Agenda packet, third session — Malibu City Council, March 18, 2026 (part 1 of 3)

PLEASE DOWNLOAD THE AGENDA DOCUMENT FOR

INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING
Meeting Agenda
260318 AGENDA.PDF
Item 1A
Appeal of Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-77 Regarding Coastal Development Permit No. 19-011 (33610 Pacific Coast Highway, APN 4473-021-012, Owner Peaches LLC, DBA, Appellant Matthew Mark)
CC260318_ITEM 1A.PDF
Item 1B
Appeal of Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-78 Regarding Coastal Development Permit No. 25-041 – An application for temporary improvements within the Pacific Coast Highway public right-of-way between Broad Beach Road and La Piedra Beach Road, including lane reductions, signage, and the intersection of two roundabouts within safety lighting at the intersection of El Matador Beach Road and Encinal Canyon Road, as recommended in the 2015 Pacific Coast Highway Safety Study conducted by the City in partnership with the California Department of Transportation (Owner: California Department of Transportation; Appellant: Dr. Thomas G. Diamantidis) CC260318_ITEM 1B.PDF

1. Documents:

2. Documents:

3. Documents:

Malibu City Council
Special Meeting Agenda
Wednesday, March 18, 2026
2:00 P.M. – CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
City Hall – Council Chambers
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Zoom Link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87985644870

GUIDE TO THE CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS AND DECORUM
ROLE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER: The presiding officer of the City Council, who shall be the Mayor, shall be responsible for maintaining the order and decorum of meetings. It shall be the duty of the presiding officer to ensure that these rules of procedure and decorum are followed at all times. The presiding officer shall maintain control of communication between Councilmembers, between the Council and the public, and chair each meeting in a fair and impartial manner. It shall be the duty of each Councilmember to support the presiding officer in maintaining the order and decorum of Council meetings.

On specific agenda items, except for public hearings, Councilmembers may question any person addressing the City Council at the conclusion of all public testimony on that agenda item before the Council. Councilmembers shall not engage any member of the public in a dialogue with themselves other Councilmembers, city staff or other members of the public. Specific rules for public hearings are described in more detail below.

MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE: Members of the audience shall not engage in disorderly or boisterous conduct, including clapping, whistling, stamping of feet, or other acts which disturb, disrupt, impede or otherwise disturb the orderly conduct of the City Council meeting. Persons addressing the City Council shall not engage in disorderly conduct which disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct or Council meetings. Any person who so disrupts a Council meeting may, at the discretion of the presiding officer or a majority of the City Council, be subject to ejection from that meeting.

MEETING PARTICIPATION: Malibu City Council meetings are held in-person. Members of the public may participate in-person or remotely. In order to participate remotely, you must be present in the Zoom Webinar during the item that you would like to speak on and use the Raise Hand feature to request to speak when the Mayor calls the item. When you join the Zoom Webinar you may see a pop-up asking you to enter an email address, but a valid email address is not required. It is strongly recommended that those who wish to participate do so in person as zoom participation is not guaranteed. While the City intends to allow zoom participation if possible, the meeting will not be cancelled or continued if technical difficulties impact the ability to accept public participation over Zoom. In such case only in-person participation will be allowed.

If you would like to speak in-person, you must complete and submit to the Recording Secretary a Request to Speak form at the meeting prior to the beginning of the item being announced by the Mayor.

Remote and in-person participants will have three (3) minutes to speak on each item on the agenda. For items on City Council Special Meeting Agenda Page - 2 - March 18, 2026 the agenda, in-person participants may also surrender their time to speak by deferring one (1) minute to another in-person speaker, not to exceed a total of eight (8) minutes. The speaker wishing to defer time must be present when the item is heard and their form must be submitted with the speaker form for the individual they are deferring time to. Speakers are taken in the order slips are submitted or hands are raised.

PUBLIC HEARINGS: For Public Hearings involving land use matters the appellant and applicant will be given 15 minutes each to present their position to the City Council, including rebuttal time. Following the initial presentations from the appellant and applicant and public testimony Councilmembers may address questions to any of the speakers, members of the public in attendance, chairpersons or a designated representative of city commissions, boards or committees, city staff or consultant. Following the question period, the appellant and applicant will have the opportunity to present rebuttal before the public hearing is closed.

Any written comments or audiovisual materials from the applicants, appellants, and/or their representatives, including any that they intend to present at the hearing, must be submitted ten (10) business days in advance, by 5:00 p.m. on March 4, 2026. Any written comments or audiovisual materials from members of the public, including any that they intend to present at the hearing, must be submitted three (3) business days in advance, by 4:00 p.m. on March 13, 2026. No additional materials from any party or the public will be accepted after these deadlines. All materials should be emailed to [email protected].

VIEW THE MEETING: The meeting will be live streamed at www.malibucity.org/video, www.youtube.com/CityofMalibu, and via Zoom Webinar.

Two p.m. Regular Session
Call to Order - Mayor
Roll Call - Recording Secretary
Pledge of Allegiance
Report on Posting of Agenda – February 13, 2026
Approval of Agenda

1. Ordinances and Public Hearings
A. Appeal of Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-77 Regarding Coastal Development Permit No. 19-011 (33610 Pacific Coast Highway, APN 4473-021-012, Owner Peaches LLC, DBA, Appellant Matthew Mark)
Recommended Action: Either: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 26-09 denying Appeal (AP) No. 24-11, determining the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and approving Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 19-011 to allow for the construction of a new 3,977.5 square foot, 28 foot high two-story single-family residence with basement, pool, spa, retaining walls, new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), and associated development; including Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 24-022 for construction over 18 feet up to a maximum of 28 feet in height for a pitched roof and Minor Modification (MM) No. 24-006 to reduce the required front yard setback by 50 percent, for a property located in the Rural Residential, Two-Acre (RR-2) zoning district at 33610 Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) (Peaches LLC); or 2) Direct staff to bring back a resolution consistent with the City Council’s decision.

City Council Special Meeting Agenda Page - 3 - March 18, 2026 Staff Contact: Community Development Director Bundy, 456-2489, ext. 229 B. Appeal of Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-78 Regarding Coastal Development Permit No. 25-041 – An application for temporary improvements within the Pacific Coast Highway public right-of-way between Broad Beach Road and La Piedra Beach Road, including lane reductions, signage, and the intersection of two roundabouts within safety lighting at the intersection of El Matador Beach Road and Encinal Canyon Road, as recommended in the 2015 Pacific Coast Highway Safety Study conducted by the City in partnership with the California Department of Transportation (Owner: California Department of Transportation; Appellant: Dr.

Thomas G. Diamantidis)
Recommended Action: Either: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 26-10 denying Appeal (AP) No. 26-001, determining the pilot project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and approving Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 25-041, an application for the temporary improvements within the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) public right-of-way between Broad Beach Road and La Piedra Beach Road, including lane reductions, signage, and the installation of two roundabouts at the intersection of El Matador Beach Road and Encinal Canyon Road, as recommended in the 2015 Pacific Coast Highway Safety Study conducted by the City in partnership with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) (City of Malibu Public Works Department and Caltrans); or 2) Direct staff to return with a resolution consistent with the City Council’s decision.

Staff Contact: Community Development Director Bundy, 456-2489, ext. 229 Adjournment
Future Regular Meetings
Monday, March 23, 2026 5:30 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting City Hall Council Chambers Monday, April 13, 2026 5:30 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting City Hall Council Chambers Monday, April 27, 2026 5:30 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting City Hall Council Chambers Copies of the staff reports or other written documentation relating to each item of business described above are on file in the office of the City Clerk, Malibu City Hall, 23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu, California, and are available for public inspection during regular office hours, which are 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Friday. Written materials distributed to the City Council within 72 hours of the City Council meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office at 23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu, California (Government Code Section 54957.5.b.2). Copies of staff reports and written materials may be purchased for $0.10 per page.

The City Hall phone number is (310) 456-2489. To contact City Hall using a telecommunication device for the deaf (TDD), please call (800) 735-2929 and a California Relay Service operator will assist you. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Community Development Director Yolanda Bundy, (310) 456-2489, ext. 229. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADD Title II].

City Council Special Meeting Agenda Page - 4 - March 18, 2026 I hereby certify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Regular and Adjourned Regular meeting agendas may be amended up to 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Dated this 13th day of February 2026 at 7:40 p.m.

Kelsey Pettijohn, City Clerk

Page 1 of 6 ends

Agenda Item #1.A.

Council Agenda Report
To: Mayor Silverstein and Honorable Members of the City Council Prepared by: Richard Greenbauer, Contract Planner
Reviewed by: Yolanda Bundy, Community Development Director Tyler Eaton, Assistant Community Development Director
Approved by: Rob Dubooux, Interim City Manager
Trevor Rusin, Interim City Attorney
Date prepared: February 5, 2026 Meeting Date: March 18, 2026 Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-77 Regarding Coastal Development Permit No. 19-011 (33610 Pacific Coast Highway, APN 4473-021-012, Owner Peaches LLC, Appellant Matthew Mark)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Either: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 26-09 (Exhibit A) denying Appeal (AP) No. 24-11 (Exhibit B), determining the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and approving Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 19-011 to allow for the construction of a new 3,977.5 square foot, 28 foot high two-story single-family residence with basement, pool, spa, retaining walls, new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), and associated development; including Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 24-022 for construction over 18 feet up to a maximum of 28 feet in height for a pitched roof and Minor Modification (MM) No. 24-006 to reduce the required front yard setback by 50 percent, for a property located in the Rural Residential, Two-Acre (RR-2) zoning district at 33610 Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) (Peaches LLC); or 2) Direct staff to bring back a resolution consistent with the City Council’s decision.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: N/A.

DISCUSSION: The matter is an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of CDP No. 19-011, SPR No. 24-022, and MM No. 24-006, for the construction of a new two-story single-family residence, swimming pool, spa, and other associated development on a legally created 19,482 square foot parcel (Exhibit B – Appeal No. 24-011).

City Council Meeting
03-18-26
Item

1.A.
1

Page 2 of 6 ends

Agenda Item #1.A.

At the December 2, 2024 Regular Planning Commission meeting, staff presented the proposed project and recommended approval of the project. Inclusive of the discretionary requests, the project meets the applicable requirements of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and the Malibu Municipal Code (MMC) due to its conformance with the development standards and the siting and design of the project. Prior to the Planning Commission hearing, also on December 2, 2024, staff received an application for a Primary View Determination (PVD) by the nearby property located two parcels to the east of the subject property at 33572 PCH, the appellant’s property. A site visit was conducted, and this determination was also provided to the Planning Commission.

After due consideration and receipt of public comments, which included three speakers in support of the proposed project, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed project with the requested SPR and MM was in conformance with the requirements of the LCP and the MMC. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 24-77, subject to conditions of approval.

On December 9, 2024, Matthew Marks filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s action. The appeal was filed in a timely manner. The basis of the appeal cites private view impacts of the Santa Monica Mountains from the appellant’s living room located at 33572 PCH, resulting from the proposed two-story single-family residence. The appellant contends that the Planning Commission’s approval is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, that there was a lack of fair or impartial hearing, and that the decision is contrary to law in that the proposed development impacts a view corridor of the Santa Monica Mountains from the applicant’s living room, which is located on the northwest portion of the residence.

As approved by the Planning Commission, the two-story residence included a maximum height of 28 feet with a pitched roof (Attachment 2 – Project Plans, of Exhibit C) and a 50 percent reduction in the required 40-foot, six-inch front yard setback to 20-foot, threeinches. The reduction was requested due to topographic constraints of the lot, including a seismic landslide area on the southern portion of the subject property that restricts where development could be sited. The south-facing slope on the project site and the adjacent property at 33616 PCH had surficial failure in the past and required remediation. To meet the required factor of safety, the project incorporated the use of a deepened foundation.

Because past slope failures were likely caused by surface runoff, the project also included the installation of a drainage swale and a three-foot-high impact wall at the toe of the descending slope.

The full description of the project site and surrounding land uses can be found in the December 2, 2024 Planning Commission Agenda Report (Exhibit C). The analysis and findings in the Planning Commission agenda report demonstrated that the project, with the SPR and MM, complied with the LCP and MMC. The Planning Commission decision included a determination on PVD No. 24-031 that the proposed residence created no significant visual impacts to the nearby residence located at 33572 PCH. 2

Page 3 of 6 ends

Agenda Item #1.A.

APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL
The appellant’s specific arguments are summarized below in italics using citations from the appeal, with staff’s response following. The full text of the appeal document can be found in Exhibit B. The Planning Commission agenda report, in which staff recommended approval of the project, is included as Exhibit C. The Planning Commission agenda report includes a complete overview of the surrounding area, project conformance with the LCP and MMC, and a discussion of all findings required to approve the application. Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-77 approving the project is included as Attachment 1 of Exhibit C.

APPEAL ITEM 1: The appellant states “PVD24-031 conducted on December 2, 2024 that illustrates view impacts of the Santa Monica Mountains as seen from their residence constitutes a view impact based upon Coastal Act Section 30251 which states, The scenic and visual qualities of coastal areas shall be considered and protected as a resource of public importance”.

Staff Response
During the processing of the subject application, staff reviewed project plans and conducted a visual assessment of the development area between 2019 and 2024. As designed, the proposed residence was deemed consistent with the LCP Local Implementation Plan’s (LIP) residential development standards and considered to be compatible with the existing development pattern of one- and two-story residences in the neighborhood. The visual assessment found that the proposed residence would not create any visual impacts from public viewing areas as identified within the LIP and Coastal Act.

While the LIP and Coastal Act include policies for the protection of public views, they do not contain policies for the protection of private views. Moreover, LIP Section 3.6(E) limits the height of structures to 18 feet, unless findings for an SPR can be made to authorize height up to 28 feet with a pitched roof. The findings associated with SPRs include consideration of public views in the LIP and private views in the MMC. LIP Section

13.27.5(A) requires that the City make four findings in consideration and approval of an SPR. Two additional findings are required pursuant to MMC Section 17.62.040(D) when a project exceeds 18 feet. Based on the foregoing evidence contained in the record, the required findings for SPR No. 24-002 were made by the Planning Commission. A summary of which are below:

Finding 1. The project is consistent with policies and provisions of the Malibu LCP.

All applicable City and County reviewers determined the project to be consistent with the policies and provisions of the LCP. The Planning Commission reviewed the evidence and determined the same. The project went through rigorous review for compliance with all chapters of the LCP by City staff and the Planning Commission. 3

Page 4 of 6 ends

Agenda Item #1.A.

Finding 2. The project does not adversely affect neighborhood character.

Story poles were installed in October of 2024. Staff visited the project site in November 2024, photo-documented the story poles, and evaluated the project for conformance with City codes. Properties in the vicinity of the subject property are predominantly developed with two-story single-family residences and accessory structures such as second units, detached garages, and swimming pools. The proposed grading will result in a lower finished grade, which will decrease the building profile when viewed from PCH.

Furthermore, the proposed total development square footage (TDSF) is considerably smaller than the adjacent property to the west and surrounding properties beyond, and will not adversely affect the neighborhood character with the proposed scale of development. Based on the existing development pattern in the area, the proposed project is expected to blend with the surrounding built environment.

Finding 3. The project provides maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by Chapter 6 of the Malibu LIP.

The site is constrained by geological landslide areas, an irregular lot configuration, and the presence of coastal and canyon bluffs. Because the development cannot be sited completely below road grade to ensure the maximum protection of ocean views, the development proposes a view corridor double the size required by LIP Section 6.5 and will provide public visibility through the site as seen from PCH, a designated scenic roadway.

The project is not expected to have significant impacts to scenic vistas with a more than compliant view corridor and provides the maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by LIP Chapter 6.

Finding 4. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law.

The project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law. All relevant City and County departments reviewed for conformance with State and local law and found the project to meet all requirements. Construction of the proposed improvements will comply with all building code requirements and will incorporate all recommendations from applicable City and County agencies.

Finding 5. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and Local Coastal Program.

The proposed project, as designed, is consistent with the applicable land use designation, is consistent with all applicable development and design standards of the LCP and goals and policies of the General Plan, because the project is located in an area that has been identified for residential use, and the proposed residence incorporates siting and design measures to minimize visual impacts and landform alterations. As mentioned previously, the project is compliant with all LCP provisions.
4

Page 5 of 6 ends

Agenda Item #1.A.

Finding 6. The portion of the project that is in excess of 18 feet in height does not obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, offshore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17).

Based on the visual impact analysis (aerial photographs, site visits and story pole placement), the Planning Commission determined that the portions of the project above 18 feet in height are not expected to obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section

17.40.040(A)(17).

The property owner of the adjacent residence two lots over to the east requested a primary view determination on November 25, 2024 in response to the public hearing notice and/or story pole installation, and formally submitted the request on December 2, 2024. Staff conducted a formal primary view determination (PVD No. 24-031), and the Planning Director and Planning Commission, after reviewing the PVD concluded that the portions of the project above 18 feet in height are not expected to obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the primary viewing area of the appellant’s residence located at 33572 Pacific Coast Highway, as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17). Portions of the Santa Monica Mountains can be seen in the distance within the PVD, but they were not determined to be visually impressive by the Planning Commission. The neighbor made their claim through public correspondence. The PVD shows visually impressive views of the Pacific Ocean, which are not being impacted by the proposed development.

As part of the appeal documentation, the appellant submitted an additional photo taken subsequent to staff’s formal PVD determination. The appellant’s photo is oriented towards the Santa Monica Mountains and states to be taken from the same position on the property as PVD No. 24-031. This is a zoomed-in photo generally in the area of PVD No. 24-031, which shows views of the Santa Monica Mountains. As stated, views of the Santa Monica Mountains are present within the PVD, but they were not determined to be visually impressive scenes by the Planning Commission. The City Council should rely on the photos taken by the City’s Planning Division, as stated in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17), as the baseline, but may consider other forms of evidence in the record.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: In accordance with the Planning Commission’s determination, the evidence in the record demonstrates the project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15303(e) – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. In addition, the evidence demonstrates that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2). 5

Page 6 of 6 ends

Agenda Item #1.A.

PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE: Correspondence received since the filing of the appeal is attached to this report as Exhibit E (letter from Applicant dated December 11, 2025).

PUBLIC NOTICE: On February 19, 2026, a Notice of City Council Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and a public notice was mailed to the owners and occupants of all properties within a radius of 500 feet of the subject property (Exhibit F).

SUMMARY: Based on the record as a whole, including but not limited to all written and oral testimony offered in connection with this matter, staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 26-06, denying the appeal and approving CDP No.19-011, SPR No. 24-022, and MM No. 24-006, subject to conditions of approval.

EXHIBITS:

A. Resolution No. 26-06
B. Appeal No. 24-011
C. December 2, 2024 Planning Commission Agenda Report with Attachments, including Resolution No. 24-77 and Correspondence
D. Primary View Determination No. 24-031
E. Public Correspondence after Planning Commission Hearing F. Notice of Public Hearing
6 Exhibit A
RESOLUTION NO. 26-06

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MALIBU, DENYING APPEAL NO. 24-11, DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS

CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NO. 19-011 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 3,977.5 SQUARE FOOT, 28 FOOT HIGH TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY HOME WITH BASEMENT,

POOL, SPA, RETAINING WALLS, NEW ONSITE WASTEWATER
TREATMENT SYSTEM, AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT; INCLUDING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 24-022 FOR CONSTRUCTION OVER 18 FEET UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 28 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR A PITCHED ROOF AND MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 24-006 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK BY 50 PERCENT, FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL, TWO-ACRE ZONING DISTRICT AT 33610 PACIFIC

COAST HIGHWAY (PEACHES LLC)
The City Council of the City of Malibu does hereby find, order and resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

A. On March 4, 2019, an application for Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 19- 011, Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 24-022, and Minor Modification (MM) No. 24-006 was submitted to the Planning Division by the applicant, Block and Block, on behalf of the property owner, Peaches LLC. The application was routed to the City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Geotechnical Consultant Reviewers, City Public Works Department, Waterworks District No. 29 (WD29), and Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) for review.

B. On July 24, 2024, the applicant posted a Notice of CDP Application on the subject property and staff deemed the CDP application complete for processing.

C. On October 24, 2024, story poles representing the location and height of the new 2-story single-family residence were installed.

D. On November 8, 2024, Planning Division staff conducted a site visit to document site conditions, the property and surrounding area, and to determine potential visual impacts of the proposed project on any scenic area, scenic road, or public viewing area.

E. On November 7, 2024, a Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

F. On December 2, 2024, Charmaine and Matthew Marks submitted a revised application for a Primary View Determination (PVD) for the property to the east of the subject property, staff conducted the PVD prior to the public hearing, and the Planning Director determined that no visual impact from the proposed project based upon the PVD would occur.

G. On December 2, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, reviewed and considered the staff report, reviewed and considered written reports, public testimony, and other information in the record, and after due consideration 7 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 2 of 24 ends

______________________
took action to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-77 approving Coastal Development Permit No. 19-011.

H. On December 9, 2024, Matthew Marks, property owner of 33572 Pacific Coast Highway, Malibu CA 90265, filed an appeal (Appeal No. 24-011) of the Planning Commission’s action approving CDP No. 19-011.

I. On February 19, 2026, a Notice of City Council Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a radius of 500 feet from the subject property and all interested parties.

J. On March 18, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject appeal, reviewed and considered the agenda report, reviewed and considered all written reports and materials including the materials before the City Council, public testimony, and other information in the record.

SECTION 2. Appeal of Action.

The appeal filed by the appellant contends that Coastal Act Section 30251 states that the scenic and visual qualities of coastal areas shall be considered and protected as a resource of public importance. The appellant contends that the development approved by the Planning Commission of a new two-story 28-foot-high residence near the appellant’s property blocks private views of the Santa Monica Mountains from the appellant’s living room as documented in Primary View Degermation No. 24-031. The appellant further contends that the Coastal Act specifically states that "permitted development shall be sited and designed to protect views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas…” Lastly, the appellant asserts that the specific finding made by the Planning Commission that the project development does not block the view corridor is incorrect and that the development does, in fact, block the appellant’s view of the Santa Monica Mountains.

SECTION 3. Findings for Denying the Appeal.

Based on evidence in the record and in the Council Agenda Report for the project, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact, deniesthe appeal, and finds that evidence in the record supports the required findings for approval of the project. In addition, the analysis, findings of fact, and conclusions set forth by staff in the Council Agenda Report and Planning Commission Agenda Report, as well as the testimony and materials considered by the Planning Commission and City Council, are incorporated herein as though fully set forth.

The project to develop a two-story 28-foot-tall single-family residence does not create a public view impact based upon Coastal Act Section 30251, which states, “The scenic and visual qualities of coastal areas shall be considered and protected as a resource of public importance” and is in compliance with the City’s Local Coastal Program (LCP) Local Implementation Plan (LIP). There are no public viewing areas impacted by the proposed development. Note that the LIP and Coastal Act include policies for the protection of public views but do not contain policies for the protection of private views. Moreover, LIP Section 3.6(E) limits the height of structures to 18 feet, unless findings for an SPR can be made to authorize height up to 28 feet with a pitched roof. The findings associated with SPRs include consideration of public views in the LIP and private views in the Malibu Municipal Code. LIP Section 13.27.5(A) requires that the City make four findings in consideration and approval of a SPR. Two additional findings are required pursuant to MMC 8 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 3 of 24 ends

______________________
Section 17.62.040(D) when a project exceeds 18 feet. Based on the foregoing evidence contained in the record, the required findings for SPR No. 24-002 are made as follows:

Finding 1. The project is consistent with policies and provisions of the Malibu LCP.

The Planning Division, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, the LACFD, and WD29 reviewed the project for conformance with the LCP by the and was found to be consistent with the LCP, inclusive of the SPR and MM.

Finding 2. The project does not adversely affect neighborhood character.

Story poles were installed in October of 2024. Staff visited the project site in November 2024, photo-documented the story poles, and evaluated the project for conformance with City codes.

Properties in the vicinity of the subject property are predominantly developed with two-story single-family residences and accessory structures such as second units, detached garages, and swimming pools. The proposed grading will result in a lower finished grade, which will decrease the building profile when viewed from PCH.

Based on the surrounding topography and existing development, the proposed project will blend with the surrounding built environment and will not have an adverse effect on neighborhood character. The neighboring properties are developed with one- and two-story single-family residences. Therefore, the project is similar in height and scale to other buildings in the same neighborhood.

Finding 3. The project provides maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by Chapter 6 of the Malibu LIP.

Finding 4. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law.

The project complies with all applicable requirements of the LCP. The Planning Division, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Geotechnical Consultant Reviewers, LACFD and WD29 reviewed the proposed project and determined it was in conformance with the LCP and other State and local requirements. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Building Safety Division will plan check the grading plans and structural plans for the residence and other improvements to verify conformance with State and local law. Construction of the proposed 9 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 4 of 24 ends

______________________
improvements will comply with all building code requirements and will incorporate all recommendations from applicable City and County agencies.

Finding 5. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and Local Coastal Program.

The proposed project, as designed, is consistent with the applicable land use designation, is consistent with all applicable development and design standards of the LCP, and goals and policies of the General Plan because the project is located in an area that has been identified for residential use, and the proposed residence incorporates siting and design measures to minimize visual impacts and landform alterations.

Based on the visual impact analysis (aerial photographs, site visits and story pole placement), staff determined that the portions of the project above 18 feet in height are not expected to obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17).

The property owner of the adjacent residence two lots over to the east verbally requested a primary view determination on November 25, 2024 in response to the public hearing notice and/or story pole installation and formally submitted the request on December 2, 2024. Staff conducted a formal primary view determination (PVD No. 24-031) and the Planning Director after reviewing the PVD concluded that the portions of the project above 18 feet in height are not expected to obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the primary viewing area of the Mark’s residence located at 33572 Pacific Coast Highway as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17).

The applicant submitted SPR No. 24-002 to allow portions of the residence to exceed 18 feet up to 28 feet for a pitched roof. The Planning Commission analyzed the SPR request with the information contained in PVD No. 24-031 and approved the SPR with the required findings per LIP Section 13.27.5(A) related to public views and additional findings per MMC Section

17.62.060 related to General Plan/LCP conformance and private views for the portion above 18 feet in height. Based on the PVD analysis, the City Council reviewed and determined that no impressive scenes of the Santa Monica Mountains from the appellant’s residence existed with the requested height increase above 18 feet. The Planning Commission considered all information in the record and adopted Resolution No. 24-77 approving CDP No. 19-011, SPR No. 24-002, and MM No. 24-006. The City Council considered all of the evidence in the record and came to the same conclusion as the Planning Commission.

As detailed above and in the record, the evidence supports the required findings for approval of the proposed Project and that it is consistent with LCP and MMC standards. The City Council finds that Appeal No. 24-011 shall not be granted.
10 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 5 of 24 ends

______________________
SECTION 4. Environmental Review.

Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Council has exercised its independent judgment and analyzed the proposal as described above. The City Council has found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15303(e) – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The City Council has further determined that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption applies to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

SECTION 5. Coastal Development Permit Findings.

Based on the evidence contained within the record, including the agenda report for the project and the hearing on December 2, 2024, and pursuant to the LIP, including the required four findings contained within LIP Section 13.27.5(A), along with the two additional findings required pursuant to MMC Section 17.62.060 when a project exceeds 18 feet. LIP Sections 13.7(B) and 13.9, and the Malibu Municipal Code (MMC), the City Council makes the findings of fact below, and approves CDP No. 19-011 for the construction of a new 3,977.5 square foot, 28 foot high twostory single-family home with basement, pool, spa, retaining walls, new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), and associated development; including SPR No. 24-022 for construction over 18 feet up to a maximum of 28 feet in height for a pitched roof and MM No. 24-006 to reduce the required front yard setback by 50 percent, for a property located in the Rural Residential, Two-Acres (RR-2) zoning district at 33610 Pacific Coast Highway (PCH).

The project is consistent with the LCP’s zoning, grading, cultural resources, water quality, and wastewater treatment system standards requirements. The project, as conditioned, has been determined to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals, and policies. The required findings are made herein.

A. General Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)

1. Evidence in the record demonstrates that the proposed project, as conditioned, conforms to the LCP and MMC in that it meets all applicable residential development standards inclusive of the MM and SPR.

2. The subject parcel is located between the first public road and the sea; however, a private access road and developed residential lots occur between the subject property and the shore. The project will not adversely impact public access or recreation because the project includes the development of the single-family residence that will be located landward of the bluff edge to comply with the 50-foot setback. Additionally, according to the LCP Park Lands and Public Access Maps, beach access is available at El Sol County Beach, located approximately 0.3 miles to the east and Nicolas Canyon County Beach, located approximately 0.6 miles to the west.

As such, no potential project-related or cumulative impact on public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976 (commencing with Sections 30200 of the Public Resources Code).
11 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 6 of 24 ends

______________________

3. A reduced project alternative could be proposed on the project site. Should the footprint be reduced, the direct land disturbance as a result of construction would be reduced.

However, the proposed project complies with the maximum allowable TDSF, impermeable coverage, and height limitations of the LCP. A smaller project may reduce the development area of the proposed project; however, a development area reduction is not expected to offer any environmental advantages. The project site’s size coupled with geologic constraints and bluff setback requirements limit the ability to develop the site in other manner than what is being proposed. As designed, the proposed project complies with the requirements of both the LCP and MMC, inclusive of the discretionary requests. In conclusion, it is not anticipated that an alternative project would offer any environmental advantages.

4. The subject parcel is not located in an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) or ESHA buffer as depicted on the LCP ESHA and Marine Resources Map. Therefore, Environmental Review Board review was not required, and this finding does not apply.

B. Site Plan Review No. 24-022 for Construction in Excess of 18 Feet in Height (LIP Section 13.27)
SPR No. 24-022 is requested for the construction of a new single-family residence over 18 feet for a maximum of 28 feet in height with a pitched roof.

1. Evidence in the record demonstrates the project is consistent with policies and provisions of the LCP.

2. Based on the surrounding topography and existing development, the proposed project will blend with the surrounding built environment and will not have an adverse effect on neighborhood character.

3. The story pole photos show that given the surrounding topography and existing development, the proposed project will blend with the surrounding built environment and does not have a significant impact on public views.

4. Evidence in the record demonstrates the project complies with all applicable requirements of state and local law.

5. Evidence in the record demonstrates the project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and LCP.

6. Based on the visual impact analysis (aerial photographs, site visits and story pole placement), staff had determined that the portions of the project above 18 feet in height are not expected to obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17). On December 2, 2024, prior to the Planning Commission public hearing, staff received an application and conducted a site visit to perform a formal Primary View Determination (PVD) for the property located at 33572 Pacific Coast Highway. Staff’s final determination on the PVD revealed “No View Impacts” associated with the proposed two-story single-family residence development at 33610 Pacific Coast Highway and was confirmed by the Planning Commission in their action to approve the project. 12 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 7 of 24 ends

______________________
C. Minor Modification No. for a reduced front yard setback (LIP Section 13.27) l. The project is consistent with the policies of the Malibu LCP in that the project has been reviewed and analyzed for conformance with the LCP. The project is consistent with the policies and provisions of the LCP and MMC. The project, with the inclusion of the requested MM, as designed and conditioned, conforms to all applicable LCP policies and provisions. A reduction in the front yard setback is needed to avoid construction on slopes 4 to l and steeper and that provides the required bluff retreat setback from the Coastal Bluff located on the southern portion of the site.

Additionally, the proposed Total Development Square Footage (TDSF) is considerably smaller than the adjacent property to the west and surrounding properties beyond and will not adversely affect the neighborhood character with the proposed scale of development. The proposed structure complies with the residential development standards of the LCP and MMC, consistent with the RR-2 zoning designation, with the inclusion of the MM and SPR request. The building is designed and sited in a manner that allows for visual access to the ocean through creation of a public View corridor, while allowing development of the highly constrained site. As stated earlier, the lot size, View corridor requirement, and seismic hazard area located along the southern portion of the property limit where development can be sited. Based on conformance with development standards, inclusive of the MM and SPR, along with project conditions for building, driveway, and wall materials and colors, proposed site and building design characteristics, the surrounding topography, and surrounding existing development, the project is not expected to have an adverse effect on neighborhood character.

3. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law, in that the project will comply with all applicable requirements of State and local law and is conditioned to comply with any relevant approvals, permits, and licenses from the City of Malibu.

The City Biologist, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department WD29, and LACFD reviewed the proposed project and determined it was in conformance with State and local requirements. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Building Safety Division will plan check the grading plans and structural plans for the residence and other improvements to verify conformance with State and local law.

Construction of the proposed improvements will comply with all building code requirements and will incorporate all recommendations from applicable City and County agencies. Therefore, the proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law.

D. Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection (LIP Chapter 6)

1. The proposed project is a new two-story single-family residence on a vacant parcel currently being used for construction staging for the adjacent parcel to the west currently under construction, and in a neighborhood developed with single-family residences. As proposed, the project complies with the non-beachfront residential standards. Based on a staff site visit and analysis it was determined that due to the lot location, dimensions, and topography, there is no 13 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 8 of 24 ends

______________________
feasible alternative building site where the development would be obscured from view from a scenic area. The proposed project has been designed to provide a public view corridor of 16 feet, 7 inches, which is approximately 42 percent of the lot’s frontage and more than twice the required width. LIP Chapter 6 requires a view corridor of 20 percent of the lot frontage to ensure that the proposed development would not obstruct views to the ocean from PCH. Additionally, the proposed landscaping and pedestrian walkway along the west side of the project will not be visible from the scenic road; therefore, the proposed project has been determined not to have a significant adverse scenic or visual impact as seen from PCH.

2. The project, as conditioned, will not have significant adverse scenic or visual impacts. The project has been conditioned to include limitations on lighting and colors of the materials used to prevent any visual impacts to scenic areas.

3. The project is the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative.

4. The project, as designed and conditioned, is not expected to adversely affect scenic and visual resources, and no feasible alternatives would avoid or substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts on scenic and visual resources.

5. As discussed in Findings 1, 2, and 4 above, the project, as proposed and conditioned, would not have significant adverse impacts on scenic and visual resources, nor eliminate, minimize or otherwise contribute to conformance to sensitive resource protection policies contained in the certified LCP.

E. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)

1. The project will not increase the instability of the site from geologic, flood, or fire hazards. The proposed development is suitable for the intended use, provided that the certified engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer’s recommendations and governing agency’s building codes are followed.

2. The project, as designed, conditioned, and approved by the City geotechnical consultant reviewers and City Public Works Department, does not pose any significant adverse impacts on the site stability or structural integrity from geologic or fire hazards due to the project design.

3. The project, as designed and conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

4. The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 by the City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, and LACFD. These specialists and agencies determined that the proposed project does not impact site stability or structural integrity, nor increase the fire hazard beyond what exist today and will actually correct existing surficial erosion through the development of the site.

5. The proposed project, as designed and conditioned, will not have adverse impacts on sensitive resources.
14 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 9 of 24 ends

______________________
F. Shoreline and Bluff Development (LIP Chapter 10)

1. As previously discussed in Section A, Finding 2, the proposed project is not anticipated to interfere with public access to the ocean. The proposed development and related construction activities are at least 50 feet from the bluff edge and beach access is available at El Sol County Beach, located approximately 0.3 miles to the east and Nicolas Canyon County Beach, located approximately 0.6 miles to the west. No development is proposed on or near the shoreline sand supply or other resources as the development' finished floor elevation (approximately 125 feet above sea level) will be 50 feet landward of the bluff edge. The proposed development complies with the reduced 50-foot setback from the coastal bluff edge pursuant to LIP 10.4(D) and the 25-foot setback from the canyon bluff pursuant to MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(6)(e) as the static factor of safety is greater than 1.5.

2. The project, as proposed and conditioned, is consistent with LIP Section 10.4.D.1 and LIP Section 10.4.H and will not have significant adverse impacts on public access, shoreline sand supply or other resources.

3. The project, as conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative. As previously stated, the proposed project, as designed, conditioned, and approved by City staff, will not have any significant adverse impacts on public access or shoreline sand supply, or other resources.

SECTION 6. City Council Action.

Based on the foregoing findings and evidence contained within the record, the City Council hereby denies Appeal No. 24-011 and approves CDP No. 19-011, SPR No. 24-002, and MM No. 24-006 subject to the following conditions.

SECTION 7. Conditions of Approval.

1. The property owners, and their successors in interest, shall indemnify and defend the City of Malibu and its officers, employees and agents from and against all liability and costs relating to the City's actions concerning this project, including (without limitation) any award of litigation expenses in favor of any person or entity who seeks to challenge the validity of any of the City's actions or decisions in connection with this project. The City shall have the sole 15 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 10 of 24 ends

______________________
right to choose its counsel and property owners shall reimburse the City's expenses incurred in its defense of any lawsuit challenging the City's actions concerning this project.

2. Approval of this application is to allow for the project described herein. The scope of work approved includes:

Construction
a. New 3,977.5 square foot, two-story single-family residence with a 1,291 square foot basement;
b. Decks and outdoor shower;
c. Swimming pool and spa;
d. Grading
e. Landscaping and hardscape;
f. New driveway and associated retaining walls; and
g. New OWTS;
Discretionary Request
The proposed project includes the following discretionary requests:
a. SPR No. 24-022 for construction over 18 feet up to a maximum height of 28 feet for a pitched roof.
b. MM No.24-006 for a 50 percent reduction of the front yard setback.

3. Except as specifically changed by conditions of approval, the proposed development shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the approved scope of work, as described in Condition No. 2 and depicted on plans on file with the Planning Division date-stamped July 8, 2024. The proposed development shall further comply with all conditions of approval stipulated in this resolution and Department Review Sheets attached hereto. In the event project plans conflict with any condition of approval, the condition shall take precedence.

4. Pursuant to LIP Section 13. 1 8.2, this permit and rights conferred in this approval shall not be effective until the property owner signs, notarizes and returns the Acceptance of Conditions Affidavit accepting the conditions of approval set forth herein. The applicant shall file this form with the Planning Division prior to the issuance of any development permits.

5. The applicant shall digitally submit a complete set of plans to the Planning Division for consistency review and approval prior to plan check and again prior to the issuance of any building or development permits.

6. The CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three (3) years after issuance of the permit, unless a time extension has been granted. Extension of the permit may be granted by the approving authority for due cause. Extensions shall be requested in writing by the applicant or authorized agent prior to expiration of the three—year period and shall set forth the reasons for the request. In the event of an appeal, the CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three years from the date the appeal is decided by the decision-making body or withdrawn by the appellant.
16 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 11 of 24 ends

______________________

7. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition of approval will be resolved by the Planning Director upon written request of such interpretation.

8. All development shall conform to requirements of the City of Malibu Community Development Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, WD29 and LACFD, as applicable. Notwithstanding this review, all required permits shall be secured.

9. Minor changes to the approved plans or the conditions of approval may be approved by the Planning Director, provided such changes achieve substantially the same results and the project is still in compliance with the Malibu Municipal Code and the Local Coastal Program. Revised plans reflecting the minor changes and additional fees shall be required.

10. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.20, development pursuant to an approved CDP shall not commence until the CDP is effective. The CDP is not effective until all appeals, including those to the California Coastal Commission (CCC), have been exhausted. In the event that the CCC denies the permit or issues the permit on appeal, the coastal development permit approved by the City is void.

11. The property owner must submit payment for all outstanding fees payable to the City prior to issuance of any building permit, including grading or demolition.

12. The property owner shall comply with all provisions of the MMC and LIP.

Cultural Resources

13. In the event that potentially important cultural resources are found in the course of geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease until a qualified archaeologist can provide an evaluation of the nature and significance of the resources and until the Planning Director can review this information. Thereafter, the procedures contained in LIP Chapter 11 and those in MMC Section 17.54.040(D)(4)(b) shall be followed.

14. If human bones are discovered during geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease and the procedures described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code shall be followed. Section 7050.5 requires notification of the coroner. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, the applicant shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission by phone within 24 hours. Following notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, the procedures described in Section 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code shall be followed.

Lighting

Page 12 of 24 ends

______________________
b. Security lighting controlled by motion detectors may be attached to the residence provided it is directed downward and is limited to 850 lumens;
c. Driveway lighting shall be limited to the minimum lighting necessary for safe vehicular use. The lighting shall be limited to 850 lumens;
d. Lights at entrances as required by the Building Code shall be permitted provided that such lighting does not exceed 850 lumens;
e. Site perimeter lighting shall be prohibited; and
f. Outdoor decorative lighting for aesthetic purposes is prohibited.

16. Night lighting for sports courts or other private recreational facilities shall be prohibited.

17. No permanently installed lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. Lighting levels on any nearby property from artificial light sources on the subject property(ies) shall not produce an illumination level greater than one foot—candle.

18. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded directed downward and inward so there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. High intensity lighting of the shore is prohibited.

19. String lights are allowed in occupied dining and entertainment areas only and must not exceed 3,000 Kelvin.

20. Motion sensor lights shall be programmed to extinguish ten minutes after activation.

21. Three violations of the conditions by the same property owner will result in a requirement to permanently remove the outdoor light fixture(s) from the site.

22. Up-lighting 0f landscaping is prohibited.

Fencing/Walls/Screening

23. Any above-ground equipment shall be screened from View by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A).

24. The applicant shall include an elevation of the proposed electronic driveway gate on the architectural plans that are submitted for building plan check. The gate and all fencing along the front property line shall comply with the regulations set forth in LIP Section 3.5.

25. The height of fences and walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A). No retaining wall shall exceed six feet in height or 12 feet in height for a combination of two or more walls.

26. New boundary fencing of any single area exceeding 1/2 acre shall be of an open rail-type design with a wooden rail at the top (instead of wire), be less than 40 inches high, and have a space greater than 14 inches between the ground and the bottom post or wire. A split rail design that blends with the natural environment is preferred.
18 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 13 of 24 ends

______________________
Construction / Framing

27. The applicant/property owner shall contract with a City-approved hauler to facilitate the recycling of all recoverable/recyclable material. Recoverable material shall include, but shall not be limited to: asphalt, dirt and earthen material, lumber, concrete, glass, metals, and drywall.

28. Prior to the issuance of a building/demolition permit, an Affidavit and Certification to implement waste reduction and recycling shall be signed by the Owner or Contractor and submitted to the Environmental Sustainability Department. The Affidavit shall indicate the agreement of the applicant to divert at least 65 percent (in accordance with CalGreen) of all construction waste from the landfill.

29. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall confirm with the City Building Official if a Los Angeles County Fire Department-compliant second egress point from the basement will be required and shall update plans accordingly should that be required.

30. Prior to the commencement of work, the applicant shall submit a copy of their Construction Management Plan. The Construction Management Plan shall include a dedicated parking location for construction workers, not within the public right-of-way.

31. A construction staging plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to plan check submittal.

32. Construction hours shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. No construction activities shall be permitted on Sundays or City-designated holidays.

33. Construction management techniques, including minimizing the amount of equipment used simultaneously and increasing the distance between emission sources, shall be employed as feasible and appropriate. All trucks leaving the construction site shall adhere to the California Vehicle Code. In addition, construction vehicles shall be covered when necessary; and their tires rinsed prior to leaving the property.

34. All new development, including construction, grading, and landscaping shall be designed to incorporate drainage and erosion control measures prepared by a licensed engineer that incorporate structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control the volume, velocity and pollutant load of storm water runoff in compliance with all requirements contained in LIP Chapter l7, including:
a. Construction shall be phased to the extent feasible and practical to limit the amount of disturbed areas present at a given time.
b. Grading activities shall be planned during the southern California dry season (April through October).
c. During construction, contractors shall be required to utilize sandbags and berms to control runoff during on-site watering and periods of rain in order to minimize surface water contamination.
d. Filter fences designed to intercept and detain sediment while decreasing the velocity of runoff shall be employed within the project site.
19 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 14 of 24 ends

______________________

35. When framing is complete, a site survey shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer or architect that states the highest roof member elevation, lowest finish floor elevation and elevation of centerline of Pacific Coast Highway. Prior to the commencement of further construction activities, said document shall be submitted to the assigned Building Inspector and Planning Division for review and sign off on framing.

36. For the transportation of heavy construction equipment and/or material, which requires the use of oversized—transport vehicles on State highways, the applicant / property owner is required to obtain a transportation permit from the California Department of Transportation.

Biology/Landscaping

37. Except as permitted pursuant to the provisions in LUP policies 3.18 and 3.20, throughout the City of Malibu, development that involves the use of pesticides, including insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides or any other similar toxic chemical substances, shall be prohibited in cases where the application of such substances would have the potential to significantly degrade Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas or coastal water quality or harm wildlife.

Herbicides may be used for the eradication of invasive plant species or habitat restoration, but only if the use of non-chemical methods for prevention and management such as physical, mechanical, cultural, and biological controls are infeasible. Herbicides shall be restricted to the least toxic product and method, and to the maximum extent feasible, shall be biodegradable, derived from natural sources, and used for a limited time.

38. Prior to installation of any landscaping, the applicant shall obtain a plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division.

39. Prior to or at the time of a Planning final inspection, the property owner/applicant shall submit to the case planner a copy of the plumbing permit for the irrigation system installation that has been signed off by the Building Safety Division.

40. Prior to final Planning inspection or other final project sign off (as applicable), the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director for review and approval a certificate of completion in accordance with the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance (MMC Section 17.53.030).

The certificate shall include the property owner’s signed acceptance of responsibility for maintaining the landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans and MMC Section 17.53.030.

41. Prior to Final Plan Check Approval, if your property is serviced by the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29, please provide landscape water use approval from that department.

42. Vegetation forming a view impermeable condition (hedge), serving the same function as a fence or wall, occurring within the side or rear yard setback shall be maintained at or below six feet in height. View impermeable hedges occurring within the front yard setback serving the same function as a fence or wall shall be maintained at or below 42 inches in height. Three sequential violations of this condition will result in a requirement to permanently remove the vegetation from the site.
20 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 15 of 24 ends

______________________

43. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to obstruct the primary View from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth). The planting plan must adhere to the View corridor requirements for the property.

44. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City of Malibu, are prohibited.

45. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.

46. Native species of the Santa Monica Mountains, characteristic of the local habitat, shall be used on graded slopes or where slope plantings are required for slope stabilization, erosion control, and watershed protection. Plants should be selected to have a variety of rooting depths. A spacing of 15 feet between large woody (>10—foot canopy) shrubs is recommended by the Fire Department. Lawns are prohibited on slopes > 5%.

47. Slope planting measures such as contour planting and terracing or other techniques shall be incorporated on slopes to interrupt the flow and rate of surface runoff in order to prevent surface soil erosion.

48. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote and copper arsenate.

49. Any site preparation activities, including removal of vegetation, between February 1 and September 15 will require nesting bird surveys by a qualified biologist at least five days prior to initiation of site preparation activities. Should active nests be identified, a buffer area no less than 150 feet (300 feet for raptors) shall be fenced off until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. A report discussing the results of nesting bird surveys shall be submitted to the City within two business days of completing the surveys.

50. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded so it is directed downward and inward so that there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. Up—lighting is prohibited.

Fire Department/Fuel Modification

51. The project shall receive LACFD approval of a Final Fuel Modification Plan prior to the issuance of final building permits.

52. The project is required to have an interior automatic sprinkler system.

Public Works

53. Clearing and grading during the rainy season (extending from November l to March 31) shall be prohibited for development that:
a. Is located within or adjacent to ESHA, or
b. Includes grading on slopes greater than 4 to 1. Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4 to 1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading operations before the 21 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 16 of 24 ends

______________________
rainy season. If grading operations are not completed before the rainy season begins, grading shall be halted and temporary erosion control measures shall be put into place to minimize erosion until grading resumes after March 3 1, unless the City determines that completion of grading would be more protective of resources.

54. Exported soil from a site shall be taken to the County Landfill or to a site with an active grading permit and the ability to accept the material in compliance with the City’s LIP Section 8.3. A note shall be placed on the project that addresses this condition.

55. A grading and drainage plan containing the following information shall be approved, and submitted to the Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of grading permits for the project:
a. Public Works Department general notes;
b. The existing and proposed square footage of impervious coverage on the property shall be shown on the grading plan (including separate areas for buildings, driveways, walkways, parking, tennis courts and pool decks);
c. The limits of land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated and a total area shall be shown on this plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits of grading, areas disturbed for the installation of the septic system, and areas disturbed for the installation of the detention system shall be included within the area delineated;
d. The limits to land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated and a total area of disturbance should be shown on this plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits 0f grading shall be included within the area delineated; e. If the property contains rare, endangered or special status species as identified in the Biological Assessment, this plan shall contain a prominent note identifying the areas to be protected (to be left undisturbed). Fencing of these areas shall be delineated on this plan as required by the City Biologist;
f. The grading limits shall include the temporary cuts made for retaining walls, buttresses and over excavations for rill slopes; and
g. Public storm drain systems shall be shown on this plan. Systems greater than 12 inches in diameter shall also have a plan and profile for the system included with this plan.

56. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMPs shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show all storm drain lines, inlets, outlet, post—construction BMPs and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements.

Page 17 of 24 ends

______________________
b. Prohibits the discharge of trash.
c. Only discharges from existing storm drain outfalls are allowed. No new outfalls will be allowed. Any proposed or new storm water discharged shall be routed to existing storm drain outfalls and shall not result in any new contribution of waste to the ASBS (i.e., no additional pollutant loading).
d. Elimination of non-storm water discharges.

58. A Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (LSWPPP) shall be provided prior to issuance of grading/building permits. This plan shall include an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) that includes, but is not limited to:

All BMPs shall be in accordance to the latest version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) BMP Handbook. Designated areas for the storage of construction materials, solid waste management, and portable toilets must not disrupt drainage patterns or subject the material to erosion by site runoff.

59. A Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) is required for this project. Storm drainage improvements are required to mitigate increased runoff generated by property development.

The applicant shall have the choice of one method specified within the City’s Local Implementation Plan Section 17.3.2.B.2. The SWMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage of the site. The SWMP shall identify the Site design and Source control Best Management Practices (BMP’s) that have been implemented in the design of the project (See LIP Chapter 17 Appendix A). The SWMP shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading/building permits for this project.

Erosion Controls Scheduling Erosion Controls Scheduling Preservation of Existing Vegetation
Sediment Controls
Silt Fence
Sand Bag Barrier
Stabilized Construction Entrance
Non-Storm Water Management Water Conservation Practices Dewatering Operations
Waste Management Material Delivery and Storage
Stockpile Management
Spill Prevention and Control
Solid Waste Management
Concrete Waste Management
Sanitary/Septic Waste Management
23 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 18 of 24 ends

______________________
a. Site Design BMPs:
b. Source Control BMPs;
c. Treatment Control BMPs that retain on-site Stormwater Quality Design Volume (SWQDv). Or where it is technically infeasible to retain on-site, the project must bioflltrate 1.5 times the SWQDv that is not retained on-site; d. Drainage improvements;
e. A plan for the maintenance and monitoring of the proposed treatment BMPs for the expected life of the structure;
f. Methods of onsite percolation, site re-vegetation and an analysis for off-site project impacts; g. Measures to treat and infiltrate runoff from impervious areas; h. A copy of the WQMP shall be filed against the property to provide constructive notice to future property owners of their obligation to maintain the water quality measure installed during construction prior to the issuance of grading or building permits; and i. The WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and the fee applicable at the time of submittal for review of the WQMP shall be paid prior to the start of the technical review. The WQMP shall be approved prior the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading and drainage plan and/or building plans. The Public Works Department will tentatively approve the plan and will keep a copy until the completion of the project. Once the project is completed, the applicant shall verify the installation of the BMP’s, make any revisions to the WQMP, and resubmit to the Public Works Department for approval. The original signed and notarized document shall be recorded with the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. A certified copy of the WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

Geology

61. All recommendations of the consulting certified engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer and/or the City geotechnical staff shall be incorporated into all final design and construction including foundations, grading, sewage disposal, and drainage. Final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City geotechnical consultant reviewers prior to the issuance of permits.

62. Final plans approved by the City geotechnical consultant reviewers shall be in substantial conformance with the approved CDP relative to construction, grading, sewage disposal and drainage. Any substantial changes may require a CDP amendment or a new CDP.

Swimming Pool / Spa / Mechanical Equipment

63. Onsite noise, including that which emanates from swimming pool and air conditioning equipment, shall be limited as described in MMC Chapter 8.24 (Noise).

64. Pool and air conditioning equipment that will be installed shall be screened from view by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A).

65. All swimming pools shall contain double walled construction with drains and leak detection systems capable of sensing a leak of the inner wall.

Page 19 of 24 ends

______________________
prohibited. Swimming pool, spa, and decorative fountain water may be used as landscape irrigation only if the following items are met:
a. The discharge water is dechlorinated, debrominated or if the water is disinfected using ozonation;
b. There are sufficient BMPs in place to prevent soil erosion; and c. The discharge does not reach into the MS4 or to the ASBS (including tributaries).

67. Discharges not meeting the above-mentioned methods must be trucked to a Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Works.

68. A sign stating “It is illegal to discharge pool, spa, or water feature waters to a street, drainage course, or storm drain per MMC Section l3.04.060(D)(5)” shall be posted in the filtration and/or pumping equipment area for the property. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall indicate the method of disinfection and the method of discharging.

Environmental Health

69. Final OWTS Plot Plan: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a final OWTS plot plan prepared by a City Registered OWTS Designer shall be submitted showing an OWTS design meeting the minimum requirements of the MMC and the LCP, including necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property and the proposed landscape plan for the developed property. The OWTS plot plan shall show essential features of the OWTS and must fit onto an 11-inch by 17-inch sheet leaving a five—inch margin clear to provide space for a City applied legend. If the scale of the plans is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details and/or all necessary setbacks, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inches by 22 inches).

70. Final OWTS Design Report, Plans, and System Specifications: A final OWTS design report and large set of construction drawings with system specifications (four sets) shall be submitted to describe the OWTS design basis and all components proposed for use in the construction of the OWTS. All plans and reports must be signed by a City Registered OWTS Designer, and the plans stamped by the project Geologist, and Structural Engineer as applicable. The final OWTS design report and construction drawings shall be submitted with the designer’s signature, professional registration number, and stamp (if applicable).

71. The final design report shall contain the following information (in addition to the items listed above).
a. Required treatment capacity for wastewater treatment and disinfection systems. The treatment capacity shall be specified in terms of flow rate, gallons per day, and shall be supported by calculations relating the treatment capacity to the number of bedroom equivalents, plumbing drainage fixture equivalents, and the subsurface effluent dispersal system acceptance rate. The drainage fixture unit count must be clearly identified in association with the design treatment capacity, even if the design is based on the number of bedrooms. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the treatment system shall be specified in the final design;
b. Sewage and effluent pump design calculations (as applicable). c. Description of proposed wastewater treatment and/or disinfection system equipment. State the proposed type of treatment system(s) (e.g., aerobic treatment, textile filter ultraviolet 25 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 20 of 24 ends

______________________
disinfection, etc.); major components, manufacturers, and model numbers for "package" systems; and conceptual design for custom engineered systems; d. Specifications, supporting geology information, and percolation test results for the subsurface effluent dispersal portion of the onsite wastewater disposal system. This must include the proposed type of effluent dispersal system (drainfield, trench, seepage pit subsurface drip, etc.) as well as the system’s geometric dimensions and basic construction features. Supporting calculations shall be presented that relate the results of soils analysis or percolation/infiltration tests to the projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate, including any unit conversions or safety factors. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the effluent dispersal system shall be specified in the final design. The projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate shall be reported in units of total gallons per day and gallons per square foot per day. Specifications for the subsurface effluent dispersal system shall be shown to accommodate the design hydraulic loading rate (i.e., average and peak OWTS effluent flow, reported in units of gallons per day). The subsurface effluent dispersal system design must take into account the number of bedrooms, fixture units and building occupancy characteristics; and
e. All final design drawings shall be submitted with the wet signature and typed name of the OWTS designer. If the scale of the plan is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inch by 22 inch, for review by Environmental Health). Note: For OWTS final designs, full-size plans are required for review by the Building Safety Division and/or the Planning Division.

72. Proof of Ownership: Proof of ownership of the subject property shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator.

73. Operations & Maintenance Manual: An operations and maintenance manual specified by the OWTS designer shall be submitted to the property owner and maintenance provider of the proposed advanced OWTS.

74. Maintenance Contract: A maintenance contract executed between the owner of the subject property and an entity qualified in the opinion of the City of Malibu to maintain the proposed onsite wastewater disposal system after construction shall be submitted. Note only original “wet signature” documents are acceptable.

75. Advanced OWTS Covenant: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a covenant running with the land shall be executed between the City of Malibu and the holder of the fee simple absolute as to subject real property and recorded with the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. Said covenant shall serve as constructive notice to any future purchaser for value that the onsite wastewater treatment system serving subject property is an advanced method of sewage disposal pursuant to the Malibu Municipal Code. Said covenant shall be provided by the City of Malibu Environmental Health Administrator.

76. Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant Approval: Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

77. City of Malibu Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant Approval: City of Malibu geotechnical staff final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.
26 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 21 of 24 ends

______________________

78. City of Malibu Public Works Approval: City of Malibu Public Works final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

79. City of Malibu Planning Approval: City of Malibu Planning Division final approval of the OWTS plan shall be obtained.

80. Environmental Health Final Review Fee: A final fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of final approval shall be paid to the City of Malibu for Environmental Health review of the OWTS design and system specifications.

81. Operating Permit Application and Fee: In accordance with Malibu Municipal Code, an application shall be made to the Environmental Health office for an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System operating permit. An operating permit fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of final approval shall be submitted with the application.

82. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Building Official, compliance with the City of Malibu’s Onsite Wastewater Treatment regulations including provisions of LIP Section 18.9 related to continued operation, maintenance and monitoring of onsite facilities.

83. Final OWTS Plot Plan: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a final OWTS plot plan shall be submitted showing an AOWTS design meeting the minimum requirements of the Malibu Plumbing Code (MPC) and the LCP, including necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property and the proposed landscape plan for the developed property. The AOWTS plot plan shall Show essential features of the AOWTS and must fit onto an 11-inch by 17—inch sheet leaving a five—inch margin clear to provide space for a City applied legend. If the scale of the plans is such that more space is needed to clearly Show construction details and/or all necessary setbacks, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inches by 22 inches).

The designer must also be a registered OWTS designer with the City of Malibu. The final OWTS design report and drawings shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator with the designer’s wet signature, professional registration number and stamp (if applicable).
27 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 22 of 24 ends

______________________
Water Service

85. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an updated Will Serve Letter from Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 to the Planning Division indicating the ability of the property to receive adequate water service.

Prior to Occupancy

86. Prior to a final Building inspection, the applicant shall provide a Recycling Summary Report (Summary Report) and obtain the approval from the Environmental Sustainability Department. Applicant must provide haul tickets and diversion information. The final Summary Report shall designate the specific materials that were landfilled or recycled and state the facilities where all materials were taken.

87. The applicant shall request a final Planning Division inspection prior to final inspection by the City of Malibu Building Safety Division. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until the Planning Division has determined that the project complies with this coastal development permit. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be granted at the discretion of the Planning Director, provided adequate security has been deposited with the City to ensure compliance should the final work not be completed in accordance with this permit.

88. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the City Biologist shall inspect the project site and determine that all Planning Division conditions to protect natural resources are in compliance with the approved plans.

89. Any construction trailer, storage equipment or similar temporary equipment not permitted as part of the approved scope of work shall be removed prior to final inspection and approval, and if applicable, the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

View Corridor

90. No landscaping on the east side of the property shall be more than six feet high for the first 100 feet from the Pacific Coast Highway boundary.

91. Pursuant to LIP Section 6.5(E)(2) and in order to ensure the protection of scenic and visual resources, the applicant is required to maintain:
a. A public view corridor a minimum of 16 feet 7 inches adjacent to the western property line extending the length of the property.
b. No portion of any structure shall extend into the view corridor above the elevation of the adjacent street.
c. Any fencing across the view corridor shall be permanently maintained as visually permeable. Tinted or frosted glass, and louvered or slatted screen fences are not permitted. d. Any landscaping in this area shall include only low-growing species that will not obscure or block bluewater views.
e. If at any time the property owner allows the view corridor to become impaired or blocked, it would constitute a violation of the coastal development permit and the Coastal Act and be subject to all civil and criminal remedies. 28 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 23 of 24 ends

______________________
Fixed Conditions

92. This coastal development permit shall run with the land and bind all future owners of the property.

93. Violation of any of the conditions of this approval may be cause for revocation of the permit and termination of all rights granted there under.

Deed Restrictions

94. The property owner is required to execute and record a deed restriction which shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs and expenses of liability arising out of the acquisition, design, construction, operation, maintenance, existence or failure of the permitted project in an area where an extraordinary potential for damage or destruction from wildfire exists as an inherent risk to life and property. The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to Planning Division staff prior to final Planning Division approval.

95. Prior to final Planning Division approval, the applicant shall be required to execute and record a deed restriction reflecting lighting requirements set forth in Condition Nos. 15-22.

The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to the Planning Division prior to final Planning Division approval.

96. The property owner is required to acknowledge, by recordation of a deed restriction, that the property is subject to wave action, erosion, flooding, landslides, or other hazards associated with development on a beach or bluff, and that the property owner assumes said risks and waives any future claims of damage or liability against the City of Malibu and agrees to indemnify the City of Malibu against any liability, claims, damages or expenses arising from any injury or damage due to such hazards. The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to the Planning Division prior to final Planning Division approval.

SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March 2026. _____________________________
BRUCE SILVERSTEIN, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
KELSEY PETTIJOHN, City Clerk
(seal)
29 Resolution No. 26-06

Page 24 of 24 ends

______________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

__________________________________
TREVOR RUSIN, Interim City Attorney
COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL – An aggrieved person may appeal the City Council’s approval to the Coastal Commission within 10 working days of the issuance of the City's Notice of Final Action. Appeal forms may be found online at www.coastal.ca.gov or by calling (805) 585- 1800. Such an appeal must be filed with the Coastal Commission, not the City.

Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 1.12.010 of the MMC and Code of Civil Procedure. Any person wishing to challenge the above action in Superior Court may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Malibu at or prior to the public hearing. 30 31
Exhibit B
32 33
34 1
Gail Duncan
From: Charmaine Mark
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2024 4:38 PM
To: Alexander da Silva; Rebecca Evans; Gail Duncan
Cc: Matthew Mark; Mark Laub
Subject: Appeal CDP-19011 33610 PCH - View from 33572 PCH Attachments: PV 24-031 - 33572 PACIFIC COAST HWY - 4473-021-018 - PVD - PRIMARY VIEW DETERMINATION.pdf
Alex/Rebecca/Gail:

FYI, I took this picture today and would like to add it to our appeal file. 35 36
3 Compare my picture, same window, same direction, same bench in the foreground with the one that was presented to the Coastal Commission in our “Primary View Determination” package prepared by Malibu Planning Department. In the Planning Dept. photo, “View #5, the story poles and Santa Monica mountains seem to have disappeared?
37 38
5 Charmaine Mark
Cell: (
39

Page 1 of 23 ends

Commission Agenda Report
To: Chair Leonard and Members of the Planning Commission Prepared by: Richard Greenbauer, Contract Planner
Reviewed by: Salvador Lopez Jr., Interim Assistant Planning Director Approved by: Maureen Tamuri, AIA, AICP, Interim Planning Director Date prepared: November 21, 2024 Meeting date: December 2, 2024 Subject: Coastal Development Permit No. 19-011, Site Plan Review No. 24-022, and Minor Modification No. 24-006 – An application to permit the construction of a new 3,977.5 square foot, two-story 28-foot-high single-family residence with a basement, pool, spa, retaining walls, new onsite wastewater treatment system, and associated development.

Location: 33610 Pacific Coast Highway, within the appealable coastal zone
APN: 4473-021-012
Owner: Peaches LLC
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-77 (Attachment 1) determining the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and approving Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 19-011 for the construction of a new 3,977.5 square foot, 28 foot high two-story single-family home with basement, pool, spa, retaining walls, new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), and associated development; including Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 24-022 for construction over 18 feet up to a maximum of 28 feet in height for a pitched roof and Minor Modification (MM) No. 24-006 to reduce the required front yard setback by 50 percent, for a property located in the Rural Residential, Two-Acre (RR-2) zoning district at 33610 Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) (Peaches LLC).

DISCUSSION: This agenda report provides a project overview, a summary of the surrounding land uses and project setting, description of the proposed project, staff’s analysis of the proposed project’s consistency with Malibu Local Coastal Program (LCP) and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC) provisions, and environmental review pursuant to CEQA. The Planning Commission can determine if the analysis contained herein Planning Commission
Meeting
12-02-24
Item

5.A.

Exhibit C
40

Page 2 of 23 ends

demonstrates the project is consistent with the LCP and MMC inclusive of the SPR and MM requests.

Project Overview
The subject blufftop property is trapezoidal shaped and is approximately 0.45 aces (19,482 square feet) in size, approximately one mile west of the intersection of PCH and Decker Edison Road. The property is located on PCH1, which is designated as a scenic road where proposed development must be assessed for potential visual impacts on a scenic area. Residential development is permitted on the parcel, subject to the non-beachfront residential development standards of the MMC and LCP. Figure 1 below shows the subject site which is currently undeveloped but being used for staging for the redevelopment of the adjacent property to the west. As depicted in Figure 2, the upper threefourths of the property is flatter than 5 to 1 and gently slopes from PCH to the south and east then steeply descends to the private access road to the south. Although the property is not subject to direct wave action, the California Coastal Commission (CCC) has determined, and subsequently confirmed by the City of Malibu’s Coastal Engineering Consultant Reviewer, that the steep slope to the south is a coastal bluff and the steep slope to the east is a canyon bluff in the area where the height exceeds 25 feet.

Accordingly, the project is subject to the Shoreline and Bluff Development Ordinance provided in LCP Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Chapter 10. As such, relevant bluff development policies and standards in the LCP have been addressed in the review of the proposed project.
1 According to LIP Chapter 2.1 (Definitions) “scenic roads” are defined as those public roads within the City that traverse or provide views of areas with outstanding scenic qualities, that contain striking views of natural vegetation, geology, and other unique natural features, including the mountains, canyons, ridgelines, beach and ocean. 41

Page 3 of 23 ends

Figure 1 –Aerial Photo
Source: Malibu CityGIS 2024
42

Page 4 of 23 ends

Figure 2 – Color Coded Slope Analysis
Source: Project Plans
The property is located within the Appeal Jurisdiction of the CCC as depicted on the PostLCP Certification Permit and Appeal Jurisdiction Map. The project site does not contain mapped trails on or adjacent to the site and has been verified by staff through review of the LCP Park Lands Map. Additionally, the property is not located in a designated Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) or ESHA buffer as shown on the LCP ESHA and Marine Resources Map.

In October 2024, story poles representing the location and height of the proposed residence were installed (Attachment 3 – Story Pole Photos). Staff conducted an inspection of the story poles and visually assessed the proposed project’s two-story design and its potential to affect public views from scenic viewing areas. Pursuant to LIP Section

6.5(E)(2)(b), the proposed project provides a 16-foot and seven-inch required view corridor along the western side of the property. Based on the project plans and staff’s site visit, staff determined that the proposed project is consistent with the existing development pattern in the area and would not impact public ocean views from PCH and nearby public 43

Page 5 of 23 ends

beaches.

The proposed two-story residence proposes a maximum height of 28 feet with a pitched roof, subject to approval of SPR No. 24-022. (Attachment 2 – Project Plans) In addition, due to the topographic constraints of the lot, the applicant is requesting approval of MM No. 24-006 to allow a 50 percent reduction of the required 40-foot six-inch front yard setback to the proposed 20-foot three-inch front yard setback. As illustrated in purple on Figure 3 below, a seismic landslide area is identified on the southern portion of the site which restricts where development could be sited. The south-facing slope on this and the adjacent property at 33616 PCH has surficially failed in the past and required remediation.

To meet the required factor of safety, the project will incorporate the use of a deepened foundation. Because past slope failures were likely caused by surface runoff, the project also includes the installation of a drainage swale and a three-foot-high impact wall at the toe of the descending slope. Approval of the MM request would allow the site to be developed with a single-family home consistent with the existing pattern of development in the surrounding neighborhood.

Figure 3: Seismic Landslide Area
Source: Malibu CityGIS 2024
Surrounding Land Uses
Properties in the immediate vicinity are zoned RR-2. The property to the west (33616 PCH) has approved City-issued CDPs for the interior and exterior remodel of the existing single-family residence, landscaping, and associated development. The remodel is 44

Page 6 of 23 ends

currently under construction. Other surrounding properties are developed with two-story single-family residences and associated development.

Between the upper flat terrace of the project site and the toe of the descending steep slope, the overall relief on the site is approximately 62 feet and occurs over a horizontal distance of approximately 210 feet. A private access road runs from PCH down the east side of the property, then turns westward and runs along the south property line at the toe of the slope. The access road is gated at PCH and serves several homes below.

Table 1 provides a summary of surrounding land uses and lot sizes.

Table 1 - Surrounding Land Uses
Direction Address / APN Lot Size Zoning Land Use
North 33603 PCH / 4473-002-
002

24.97 acres RR-2 SFR*
South/East 4473-021-013 .37 acres RR-2 Private Access Road to SFR Beyond
West
33616 PCH / 4473-021-
011
.65 acres RR-2 SFR
* SFR = Single-Family Residential
Table 2 provides a summary of the lot dimensions and the lot area of the subject parcel.

Table 2 – Property Data
Lot Depth 202.5 feet
Lot Width 111 feet
Gross Lot Area 19,482 square feet (0.45 acres)
Area of 1:1 or Steeper Slopes 2,628 square feet
Net Lot Area* 16,854 square feet (0.39 acres)
*Net Lot Area = Gross Lot Area minus the area of access easements and 1:1 or steeper slopes.

Project Description
The proposed scope of work is as follows:
a. New 3,977.5 square foot, two-story single-family residence with a 1,291 square foot basement;
b. Decks and outdoor shower;
c. Swimming pool and spa;
d. Grading
e. Landscaping and hardscape;
f. New driveway and associated retaining walls; and
g. New OWTS
45

Page 7 of 23 ends

The proposed project includes the following discretionary requests:
a. SPR No. 24-022 for construction over 18 feet up to a maximum height of 28 feet for a pitched roof.
b. MM No.24-006 for a 50 percent reduction of the front yard setback Local Coastal Program
The Malibu LCP consists of the Land Use Plan (LUP) and the LIP. The LUP contains programs and policies to implement the Coastal Act in Malibu. The LIP contains provisions to carry out the policies of the LUP to which every project requiring a CDP must adhere.

There are 14 LIP chapters that potentially apply depending on the nature and location of the proposed project. Of these, five are for conformance review only and contain no findings: 1) Zoning, 2) Grading, 3) Archaeological/Cultural Resources, 4) Water Quality, and 5) OWTS. These chapters are discussed in the LIP Conformance Analysis section.

The nine remaining LIP chapters contain the required findings: 1) Coastal Development Permit; 2) Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA); 3) Native Tree Protection; 4) Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection; 5) Transfer of Development Credits; 6) Hazards; 7) Shoreline and Bluff Development; 8) Public Access; and 9) Land Division.

For the reasons described in this report, including the project site, the scope of work and substantial evidence in the record, only the following chapters and associated findings are applicable to the proposed project: Coastal Development Permit (including the required findings for the SPR), Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection, Hazards and Shoreline and Bluff Development. ESHA and Native Tree Protection chapters do not apply as the entire site is devoid of Native Tree’s and there is no ESHA that would be impacted as a result of developing the site consistent with the zoning for the site. 2 These chapters
are discussed in the LIP Findings section of this report.

The findings required by MMC Section 17.62.040 for the Site Plan Review and by MMC Section 17.72.060 for the Minor Modification are discussed following the LCP analysis.

The discussion below has been limited to those LIP chapters and conformance issues potentially affected by the proposed amendment.

LIP Conformance Analysis
The City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD), and Los Angeles County 2 The ESHA, Native Tree Protection, Transfer of Development Credits, Public Access, and Land Division findings are neither applicable nor required for the proposed project. 46

Page 8 of 23 ends

Waterworks District No. 29 (WD29) reviewed the proposed project (Attachment 4 – Department Review Sheets). These specialists found the proposed project, as conditioned is consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals and policies, with the inclusion of the requested SPR and subject to approval of the requested MM.

Zoning (LIP Chapter 3)
The proposed coastal development permit is subject to development and design standards set forth under LIP Section 3.5 and 3.6. Table 3 provides a summary and indicates the proposed project meets those standards.

Table 3 – Zoning Conformance
Development Requirement Allowed/
Required Proposed Comments
SETBACKS (ft.)
Front Yard 40 ft. 6 in. (min.) 20 ft. 3 in. MM 24-006
Rear Yard 30 ft. 4.5 in.
(min.)
30 ft. 4.5 in. Complies
Side Yard (East) 10% 11 ft. 1 in. (min.) 11 ft. 1 in. Complies Side Yard (West) 15% 16 ft. 8 in. (min.) 16 ft. 8 in. Complies Total Side Yard (Cumulative 25%) 27 ft. 9 in. (min.) 27 ft. 9 in. Complies Bluff Edge
100 ft. from bluff
edge; or 50 ft.
with City
geotechnical
consultant
reviewer
approval
50 ft. with City
geotechnical
consultant
reviewer
approval
Complies

PARKING SPACES
Enclosed (10 ft. x 18 ft.) 2 2 Complies
Unenclosed (10 ft. x 18 ft.) 2 2 Complies
Total Development Square Footage (TDSF) (sq. ft.)
TDSF 3,983 (max.) 3,977.53 Complies
Single-Family Residence 3,832
Basement 1,2914
TWO-THIRDS RULE / 2ND FLOOR
SQ. FT. 1,757 (max.) 1,710 Complies
3 This square footage does not include the first 1,000 square feet of basement pursuant to LIP Section 3.6(K)(3) which states “The initial one thousand (1,000) square feet of a basement shall not count toward TDSF.” 4 Pursuant to LIP Section 3.6(K)(3), one-half of the additional basement area in excess of 1,000 square feet shall be included in the calculation of TDSF. Accordingly, 145.5 square feet of basement area are included in the total proposed TDSF.
47

Page 9 of 23 ends

Table 3 – Zoning Conformance
Development Requirement Allowed/
Required Proposed Comments
HEIGHT (ft.)
Single-Family Residence 18 28 SPR 24-006

IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE
(sq.ft.) 5,899 (max.) 3,860 Complies
NON-EXEMPT GRADING (cu.yd.) 1,000 (max.) 4905 Complies
CONSTRUCTION ON SLOPES 4 to 1 and flatter 4 to 1 and
flatter Complies
IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE (SQ. FT.) 5,899 (max.) 3,860 Complies

FENCES/WALLS/HEDGES
Retaining Walls 6 ft. max. 12 ft.
cumulative
6 ft. max. 12 ft.
cumulative
Complies
Front Yard
Impermeable 42 in. 42 in. Complies
Permeable 6 ft. 6 ft. Complies
Rear & Side Yard 6 ft. 6 ft. Complies
As shown in Table 3, the proposed project, inclusive of the SPR and MM requests, conforms to the development standards as set forth within LIP Chapter 3, subject to approval of a 50% Minor Modification for the front yard setback. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals, and policies.

Grading (LIP Chapter 8)
LIP Section 8.3 ensures that new development minimizes the visual resource impacts of grading and landform alteration by restricting the amount of non-exempt grading to a maximum of 1,000 cubic yards for a residential parcel. As summarized in Table 4 – LCP Grading Conformance). Proposed grading required as part of this project’s overall design and considering remedial grading due to the sites seismic landslide areas would result in approximately 140 cubic yards of non-exempt grading occurring of which 54 cubic yards will be exported off site. The subject landform alteration would result in a new finish grade that is lower than the natural grade that currently exists, and ultimately resulting in a lower building elevation profile as seen from PCH. As such, the proposed new single-family residence and overall site development design has been determined to comply with the grading requirements set forth under LIP Section 8.3.
5 This grading quantity is a cumulative total that includes 350 cubic yards of non-exempt grading completed under CDP No. 12-042 and 140 cubic yards of non-exempt grading proposed in the subject application. 48

Page 10 of 23 ends

Table 4 – LCP Grading Conformance
Exempt*** NonR&R** Understructure Safety**** Exempt Remedial Total Cut 55 cy 1,094 cy 0 97 cy 0 1,246 cy
Fill 55 cy 1 cy 0 43 cy 0 99 cy
Total 110 cy 1,095 cy 0 140 cy 0 1,345 cy
Import 0 0 0 0 0 0
Export 0 1,093 cy 0 54 cy 0 1,147 cy
**Note: R&R= Removal and Recompaction; cy = cubic yards ***Exempt grading includes all Removal and Recompaction (R&R), understructure and safety grading. ****Safety grading is the incremental grading required for fire department access (such as turnouts, hammerheads and turnarounds and any other increases in driveway width above 15 feet required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department).

Archaeological / Cultural Resources (LIP Chapter 11)
LIP Chapter 11 requires certain procedures be followed to determine potential impacts on archaeological resources. A Phase I Archaeological Survey was prepared by Robert J.

Wlodarski of HEART, Inc. for the subject property in February 2010. No indication of prehistoric or historic archaeological resources was discovered in the project area. HEART determined that any proposed improvements should have no adverse impacts to known cultural resources.

Nevertheless, a condition of approval is included which states that in the event that potentially important cultural resources be found in the course of geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease until a qualified archaeologist can provide an evaluation of the nature and significance of the resources and until the Planning Director can review this information.

Water Quality (LIP Chapter 17)
The City Public Works Department reviewed and approved the proposed project for conformance to LIP Chapter 17 requirements for water quality protection and requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board because the property is located in an Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS). The ocean between Latigo Point and west City limits has been established by the State Water Resources Control Board as an ASBS as part of the California Ocean Plan. Standard conditions of approval include the implementation of an approved Stormwater Management Plan during all periods of construction and the resultant activities; as well as post construction to manage stormwater runoff from the single family residential developed property, up to and including recordation of a water quality mitigation plan, and best management practices in compliance with ASBS standards. With the implementation of these conditions, it has been determined that the proposed project conforms to the water quality protection standards contained within LIP Chapter 17.
49

Page 11 of 23 ends

Wastewater Treatment System Standards (LIP Chapter 18)
LIP Chapter 18 addresses OWTS. LIP Section 18.7 includes specific siting, design, and performance requirements. The project includes an OWTS to serve the proposed development, which contains a 2,500-gallon MicroSepTec ES7.5 tertiary treatment tank\ with an ultraviolet disinfection unit, two seepage pits, and one future seepage pit. The OWTS and seepage pits will be located on the north portion of the property between the residence and PCH. The OWTS conformance review was completed for two bedrooms and 50 drainage fixture units for the single-family residence. The OWTS has been reviewed by the City Environmental Health Administrator and found to meet the minimum requirements of the LCP and MMC.

LIP Findings
A. Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)
LIP Section 13.9 requires that the following four findings be made for all coastal development permits. As discussed above, the proposed amendment, as conditioned, conforms to the certified City of Malibu LCP in that it meets the required residential development standards subject to approval of a MM to allow a 50 percent reduction of the required 40 foot 6 inch front yard setback and providing a 20 foot 3 inch front yard setback.

Finding 1. The project as described in the application and accompanying materials, as modified by any conditions of approval, conforms to the certified City of Malibu Local Coastal Program.

The proposed new single-family residence project has been reviewed for conformance with the LCP by the Planning Department, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Biologist, Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, LACFD and WD29. As discussed herein, based on submitted reports, project plans, visual analysis and site investigation, the proposed project, as conditioned, conforms to the LCP in that it meets all applicable residential development standards, inclusive of the requested SPR and MM.

Finding 2. If the project is located between the first public road and the sea, the project conforms to the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976 (commencing with Section 30200 of the Public Resources Code).

The subject parcel is located between the first public road and the sea; however, a private access road and developed residential lots occur between the subject property and the shore. The project will not adversely impact public access or recreation because the project includes the development of the single-family residence that will be located landward of the bluff edge to comply with the 50-foot setback. Additionally, according to the LCP Park Lands and Public Access Maps, beach access is available at El Sol County 50

Page 12 of 23 ends

Beach, located approximately 0.3 miles to the east and Nicolas Canyon County Beach, located approximately 0.6 miles to the west. As such, no potential project-related or cumulative impact on public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976 (commencing with Sections 30200 of the Public Resources Code).

Finding 3. The project is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

This analysis assesses whether alternatives to the proposed project would significantly lessen adverse impacts on coastal resources.

1. Alternative Project – A reduced project alternative could be proposed on the project site. Should the footprint be reduced, the direct land disturbance as a result of construction would be reduced. However, the proposed project complies with the maximum allowable TDSF, impermeable coverage, and height limitations of the LCP. A smaller project may reduce the development area of the proposed project however, a development area reduction is not expected to offer any environmental advantages. The project site’s size coupled with geologic constraints and bluff setback requirements limit the ability to develop the site in other manner than what is being proposed. As designed, the proposed project complies with the requirements of both the MMC and LCP, inclusive of the discretionary requests. In conclusion, it is not anticipated that an alternative project would offer any environmental advantages.

2. Proposed Project – The proposed project consists of a new 3,977 square foot twostory single-family residence with a footprint of 2,636 square feet, pool, 8,761 square feet of landscaping, and associated development. As proposed, the development has been designed to ensure that no potential significant impacts to coastal resources. The implementation of bluff restoration using a seed mix will enhance the site and the current degradation of the bluff due to geologic conditions.

Finding 4. If the project is located in or adjacent to an environmentally sensitive habitat area pursuant to Chapter 4 of the LIP (ESHA Overlay), that the project conforms to the recommendations of the Environmental Review Board, or it does not conform to the recommendations, findings are included which explain why it is not feasible to take the recommended action.

The subject parcel is not located in an ESHA or ESHA buffer as depicted on the LCP ESHA and Marine Resources Map. Therefore, Environmental Review Board review was not required, and this finding does not apply.
51

Page 13 of 23 ends

B. Site Plan Review Request from LIP Section 3.6(E) – Construction in Excess of 18 Feet in Height [LIP Section 13.27]
LIP Section 3.6(E) requires a SPR for height of structures over 18 feet, up to 28 feet with a pitched roof. The applicant is requesting SPR No. 24-022 to allow the proposed singlefamily residence to reach a height of up to 28 feet (pitched). LIP Section 13.27.5(A) requires that the City make four findings in consideration and approval of a site plan review.

Two additional findings are required pursuant to MMC Section 17.62.040(D) when a project exceeds 18 feet. Based on the foregoing evidence contained in the record, the required findings for SPR No. 24-022 are made as follows:

Finding 1. The project is consistent with policies and provisions of the Malibu LCP.

The Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, the LACFD, and WD29 reviewed the project for conformance with the LCP by the and was found to be consistent with the LCP, inclusive of the SPR and MM.

Finding 2. The project does not adversely affect neighborhood character.

Story poles were installed in October of 2024. Staff visited the project site in November 2024, photo-documented the story poles, and evaluated the project for conformance with City codes. Properties in the vicinity of the subject property are predominantly developed with two-story single-family residences and accessory structures such as second units, detached garages, and swimming pools. The proposed grading will result in a lower finished grade which will decrease the building profile when viewed from PCH.

Furthermore, as noted in Section A Finding 3, the proposed TDSF is considerably smaller than the adjacent property to the west and surrounding properties beyond, and will not adversely affect the neighborhood character with the proposed scale of development.

Based on the existing development pattern in the area, the proposed project is expected to blend with the surrounding built environment.

Based on the surrounding topography and existing development, the proposed project will blend with the surrounding built environment and will not have an adverse effect on neighborhood character. The neighboring properties are developed with one- and twostory single-family residences. Therefore, the project is similar in height and scale to other buildings in the same neighborhood.

Finding 3. The project provides maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by Chapter 6 of the Malibu LIP.
52

Page 14 of 23 ends

The project is not expected to have significant impacts to scenic vistas and provides the maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by LIP Chapter 6.

Finding 4. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law.

As previously discussed in Section A, Finding 1, the project complies with all applicable requirements of the LCP. The Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Geotechnical Consultant Reviewers, LACFD and WD29 reviewed the proposed project and determined it was in conformance with the LCP and other State and local requirements. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Building Safety Division will plan check the grading plans and structural plans for the residence and other improvements to verify conformance with State and local law. Construction of the proposed improvements will comply with all building code requirements and will incorporate all recommendations from applicable City and County agencies.

Finding 5. The project is consistent with the City's general plan and local coastal program.

The proposed project, as designed, is consistent with the applicable land use designation, is consistent with all applicable development and design standards of the LCP and goals and policies of the General Plan because the project is located in an area that has been identified for residential use and the proposed residence incorporates siting and design measures to minimize visual impacts and landform alterations.

Based on the visual impact analysis (aerial photographs, site visits and story pole placement), staff has determined that the portions of the project above 18 feet in height are not expected to obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17). No nearby property owners have requested a primary view determination in response to the courtesy notice or story pole installation.
53

Page 15 of 23 ends

C. Minor Modification for a reduced front yard setback (LIP Section 13.27) Pursuant to LIP Section 13.27.1(B), a minor modification may be granted for a reduction in the front yard setback by no more than 50 percent. A minor modification is proposed for a 50 percent reduction in the required front yard setback to allow a 20-foot three-inch setback where a 40-foot six-inch setback is required. The reduced front yard setback will avoid development on slopes 4 to 1 and steeper and encroachment into the required bluff retreat setbacks. Three additional findings are required pursuant to LIP Section 13.27.5(B).

Based on the evidence contained in the record, the required findings for MM No. 24-006 can be made as follows:

Finding 1. The project is consistent with the policies of the Malibu LCP.

As previously stated in Section A, Finding 1, the project has been reviewed and analyzed for conformance with the LCP. The project is consistent with the policies and provisions of the LCP and MMC. The project, with the inclusion of the requested MM, as designed and conditioned, conforms to all applicable LCP policies and provisions. A reduction in the front yard setback is needed to avoid construction on slopes 4 to 1 and steeper and that provides the required bluff retreat setback from the Coastal Bluff located on the southern portion of the site.

Finding 2. The project does not adversely affect neighborhood character.

As previously stated in Section B, Finding 2, story poles were placed on the site to demonstrate the project’s potential for view impacts to the surrounding area. The proposed project consists of a new 3,977.5 square foot two-story single-family residence with a footprint of 2,636 square feet, pool, 8,761 square feet of landscaping, and associated development. The project site’s size coupled with geologic constraints and bluff setback requirements limits the ability to develop the site in any other manner than what is being proposed. The project’s height and bulk will not adversely affect neighborhood character. Additionally, the proposed TDSF is considerably smaller than the adjacent property to the west and surrounding properties beyond and will not adversely affect the neighborhood character with the proposed scale of development. The proposed structure complies with the residential development standards of the LCP and MMC, consistent with the RR-2 zoning designation, with the inclusion of the MM and SPR request. The building is designed and sited in a manner that allows for visual access to the ocean through creation of a view corridor, while allowing development of the highly constrained site. As stated earlier, the lot size, view corridor requirement, and seismic hazard area located along the southern portion of the property limit where development can be sited. Based on conformance with development standards, inclusive of the MM and SPR, along with project conditions for building, driveway, and wall materials and colors, proposed site and building design characteristics, the surrounding topography, and surrounding existing development, the project is not expected to have an adverse effect on neighborhood 54

Page 16 of 23 ends

character.

Finding 3. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law.

The project will comply with all applicable requirements of State and local law and is conditioned to comply with any relevant approvals, permits, and licenses from the City of Malibu. The City Biologist, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, WD29, and LACFD reviewed the proposed project and determined it was in conformance with State and local requirements.

Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Building Safety Division will plan check the grading plans and structural plans for the residence and other improvements to verify conformance with State and local law. Construction of the proposed improvements will comply with all building code requirements and will incorporate all recommendations from applicable City and County agencies. Therefore, the proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law.

D. Native Tree Protection (LIP Chapter 5)
There are no native trees on or adjacent to the subject parcel. Therefore, the findings of LIP Chapter 5 are not applicable.

E. Scenic, Visual, and Hillside Resource Protection (LIP Chapter 6) The Scenic, Visual, and Hillside Resource Protection Chapter governs those coastal development permit applications concerning any lot that is located along, within, provides views to or is visible from any scenic area, scenic road or public viewing area. In November 2024, staff visited the site to determine potential visual impacts of the proposed project on any scenic area, scenic road, or public viewing area. Based on the site visit, existing development, project plans, and photographs taken during the site visit, it was determined that the proposed project would be visible from PCH, an LCP-designated scenic highway.

Accordingly, the findings in LIP Section 6.4 are required for the proposed project as follows:

Finding 1. The project, as proposed, will have no significant adverse scenic or visual impacts due to project design, location on the site or other reasons.

The proposed project is a new two-story single-family residence on a vacant parcel in a neighborhood developed with single-family residences. As proposed, the project complies with the non-beachfront residential standards. Based on a staff site visit and analysis it was determined that due to the lot location, dimensions, and topography, there is no feasible alternative building site where the development would be obscured from view from a scenic area. The proposed project has been designed to provide a view corridor of 16 feet 7 inches, which is approximately 42 percent of the lot’s frontage and more than twice 55

Page 17 of 23 ends

the required width. LIP chapter 6 requires a view corridor of 20 percent of the lot frontage to ensure that the proposed development would not obstruct views to the ocean from PCH.

Additionally, the proposed landscaping and pedestrian walkway along the west side of the project will not be visible from the scenic road; therefore, the proposed project has been determined not have a significant adverse scenic or visual impact as seen from PCH.

Finding 2. The project, as conditioned, will not have significant adverse scenic or visual impacts due to required project modifications, landscaping or other conditions.

As mentioned in Finding 1, the proposed project has been designed to provide a view corridor more than twice the required width. The project as conditioned will not have significant adverse scenic or visual impacts. The project has been conditioned to include limitations on exterior lighting and colors of exterior finishes used to prevent any visual impacts to scenic areas.

Finding 3. The project, as proposed or as conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

As previously discussed in Section A, Finding 3, the project is the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative.

Finding 4. There are no feasible alternatives to development that would avoid or substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts on scenic and visual resources.

The project, as designed and conditioned, is not expected to adversely affect scenic and visual resources and no feasible alternatives would avoid or substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts on scenic and visual resources.

Finding 5. Development in a specific location on the site may have adverse scenic and visual impacts but will eliminate, minimize or otherwise contribute to conformance to sensitive resource protection policies contained in the certified LCP.

As discussed in Finding 1, the project, as proposed and conditioned, has been designed to minimize visual impacts to public views from PCH to the greatest extent feasible by providing a view corridor requirements that is consistent with the development standards.

Therefore, the proposed development, as designed, is sited to eliminate, minimize or otherwise contribute to conformance to sensitive resources.

F. Transfer of Development Credit (LIP Chapter 7)
The proposed project does not include a land division or multi-family development.

Therefore, the findings of LIP Chapter 7 are not applicable. 56

Page 18 of 23 ends

G. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)
Pursuant to LIP Section 9.3, written findings of facts, analysis and conclusions addressing geologic, flood, and fire hazards, structural integrity or other potential hazards must be included in support of all approval, denials, or conditional approvals of development located in or near an area subject to these hazards. The project has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Section 9.2(A)(1-7) must be included in support of all approvals, denials or conditional approvals of development located on a site or in an area where it is determined that the proposed project causes the potential to create adverse impacts upon site stability or structural integrity.

The Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator and City Geotechnical Consultant Reviewers and City Public Works Department analyzed the proposed development for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9. The required findings are made as follows:

Finding 1. The project, as proposed, will neither be subject to nor increase instability of the site or structural integrity from geologic, flood, or fire hazards due to the project design, location on the site, or other reasons.

The applicant submitted geotechnical investigation reports prepared by Stratum Geotechnical Consultants dated September 28, 2018 and December 21, 2018 and GeoSoils Consultants Inc, dated June 14, 2019, January 17, 2020, August 6, 2020, and April 14, 2022. All reports are on file at City Hall. In these reports, site-specific conditions are evaluated, and recommendations are provided to address any pertinent issues.

Potential geologic hazards analyzed include geologic, seismic, and fault rupture, liquefaction, landslide, groundwater, wave uprush, sea level rise, tsunami, and flood hazards. Based on review of the project plans and associated reports by the City Environmental Health Administrator, and the City geotechnical consultant reviewers, these specialists determined that adverse impacts to the project site related to the proposed development as designed and conditioned are not expected.

With respect to bluff edge setbacks, LIP Section 10.4(D) includes a provision to allow a reduction in the setback from the bluff edge from 100 feet to a minimum of 50 feet if the City geotechnical staff determines the required factors of safety are met. The City geotechnical consultant reviewers determined the proposed geotechnical setback line, which is set back 50 feet from the geological top of slope, meets the requirements of LIP Section 10.4(D). All structural footings will be located landward of this line. Ancillary structures without footings, such as patios and barbecues, may not be located within 15 feet from the bluff edge. The project geotechnical consultant asserted that previous surficial erosion and failures within the bluff slope were mostly due to surface water runoff flow over the slope and recommended installing a swale at the top of the bluff slope to intercept surface runoff and prevent water from flowing over the slope face; hence reducing the potential for surficial failure and erosion. The project geotechnical consultant 57

Page 19 of 23 ends

concluded that, considering the low water usage, controlled irrigation and management, and mitigation measures including a drainage swale, and the use of a wire mesh on the bluff face, the landscaping and irrigation should not negatively impact the bluff. The City contract geotechnical reviewers accepted this analysis and conclusion. However, the anticipated bluff retreat by the project geotechnical consultant of two inches per year could potentially undermine the swale and accelerate the rate of erosion.

The project, as conditioned, will incorporate all recommendations contained in the above cited geotechnical report, along with mitigation measures and conditions of approval required by the City Public Works Department, City geotechnical consultant reviewer, and the LACFD. As such, the proposed project will not increase instability of the site or structural integrity from geological, floor, or any other hazards.

Fire Hazard
The entire City of Malibu is designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, a zone defined by a more destructive behavior of fire and a greater probability of flames and embers threatening buildings. The subject property is currently subject to wildfire hazards.

The scope of work proposed as part of this application is not expected to have an adverse impact on wildfire hazards. The proposed development may actually decrease the site’s susceptibility to wildfire through compliance with fuel modification requirements and the use of appropriate building materials will be utilized during construction.

The City is served by the LACFD, as well as the California Department of Forestry, if needed. In the event of major fires, the County has “mutual aid agreements” with cities and counties throughout the State so that additional personnel and firefighting equipment can augment the LACFD. Conditions of approval have been included in the resolution to require compliance with all LACFD development standards. As such, the proposed project, as designed, constructed, and conditioned, will not be subject to nor increase the instability of the site or structural integrity involving wildfire hazards.

Findings 2. The project, as conditioned, will not have significant adverse impacts on site stability or structural integrity from geological, flood, or fire hazards due to required project modifications, landscaping, or other conditions.

As stated in Finding 1 above, the proposed project, as designed, conditioned, and approved by the applicable departments and agencies, will not have any significant adverse impacts on the site stability or structural integrity from geologic or flood hazards due to project mitigation measures and conditions of approval to be established as part of this project’s approval.

Finding 3. The project, as proposed or as conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.
58

Page 20 of 23 ends

As previously stated in Section A, the proposed project, as designed and conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

Finding 4. There are no alternatives to development that would avoid or substantially lessen impacts on site stability or structural integrity.

The Planning Department, City Biologist, City geotechnical consultant reviewer, and the City Public Works Department analyzed the proposed development for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9. These specialists determined that the proposed project does not impact site stability or structural integrity to future development, nor will it create any stability of structural issues for properties adjacent to the site or the private access road to properties to the south.

Finding 5. Development in a specific location on the site may have adverse impacts but will eliminate, minimize, or otherwise contribute to conformance with sensitive resource protection policies contained in the certified Malibu LCP.

As previously discussed, the proposed project, as designed and conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative, and no adverse impacts to sensitive resources are anticipated.

H. Shoreline and Bluff Development (LIP Chapter 10)
The project site is located between PCH and the Pacific Ocean. City geotechnical consultant reviewers reviewed and approved submitted geotechnical prepared by Stratum Geotechnical Consultants dated September 28, 2018 and December 21, 2018 and GeoSoils Consultants Inc, dated June 14, 2019, January 17, 2020, August 6, 2020, and April 14, 2020. The City geotechnical consultant reviewers determined that the development will not encroach into the 50-foot blufftop setback nor the 25-foot setback from the top of the canyon bluff and the proposed project is not expected to destabilize the structural integrity of the bluff or impact shoreline access along the beach at the rear of the property. LIP Section 10.3 requires that shoreline and bluff development findings be made if the proposed project is anticipated to result in potentially significant adverse impacts on coastal resources, such as public access and shoreline sand supply. While the property is not subject to direct wave action, the Coastal Commission determined the steep, south facing slope to be a coastal bluff. As such, the findings in LIP Section 10.3 are as follows.

Finding 1. The project, as proposed, will have no significant adverse impacts on public access, shoreline sand supply or other resources due to project design, location on the site or other reasons.

As previously discussed in Section A, Finding 2, the proposed project is not anticipated to interfere with public access to the ocean. The proposed development and related 59

Page 21 of 23 ends

construction activities are at least 50 feet from the bluff edge and beach access is available at El Sol County Beach, located approximately 0.3 miles to the east and Nicolas Canyon County Beach, located approximately 0.6 miles to the west. No development is proposed on or near the shoreline sand supply or other resources as the development finished floor elevation (approximately 125 feet above sea level) will be 50 feet landward of the bluff edge. The proposed development complies with the reduced 50-foot setback from the coastal bluff edge pursuant to LIP 10.4(D) and the 25-foot setback from the canyon bluff pursuant to MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(6)(e) as the static factor of safety is greater than

1.5. The site design is consistent with the LIP’s requirement that prohibits structural foundations within 15 feet of the bluff edge. In conclusion staff has determined that the proposed project would not have any adverse impacts on coastal or inland canyon bluffs, shoreline sand supply, public access or other coastal resources.

Finding 2. The project, as conditioned, will not have significant adverse impacts on public access, shoreline sand supply or other resources due to required project modifications or other conditions.

As stated in Finding 1, as designed, conditioned, and conceptually approved by the various City staff and reviewing entities, the project will not have any significant adverse impacts on public access or shoreline sand supply or other resources.

Finding 3. The project, as proposed or as conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

As discussed in Section A, the proposed project, as designed and conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

Finding 4. There are no alternative to the proposed development that would avoid or substantially lessen impacts on public access, shoreline sand supply, or other resources.

As previously stated, the proposed project as designed, conditioned, and approved by City staff, the project will not have any significant adverse impacts on public access or shoreline sand supply, or other resources.

Finding 5. In addition, if the development includes a shoreline protective devices, that it is designed or conditioned to be sited as far landward as feasible, to eliminate or mitigate to the maximum feasible extent adverse impacts on local shoreline sand supply and public access, there are no alternative that would avoid or lessen impacts on shoreline sand supply, public access or coastal resources and is the least environmentally damaging alternative.
60

Page 22 of 23 ends

The development does not involve a new or modified shoreline protective device; therefore, this finding is not applicable.

I. Public Access (LIP Chapter 12)
LIP Section 12.4 requires public access for lateral, bluff-top, and vertical access near the ocean, trails, and recreational access for the following cases:

A. New development on any parcel or location specifically identified in the Land Use Plan or in the LCP zoning districts as appropriate for or containing a historically used or suitable public access trail or pathway.

B. New development between the nearest public roadway and the sea.

C. New development on any site where there is substantial evidence of a public right of access to or along the sear or public tidelands, a blufftop trail or an inland trail acquired through use or a public right of access through legislative authorization.

D. New development on any site where a trail, bluff top access or other recreational access is necessary to mitigate impacts of the development on public access where there is no feasible, less environmentally damaging, project alternative that would avoid impacts to public access.

No official LCP trail is mapped on the subject property. Lateral public beach access exists along the State of California’s “wet sand right of way” which allows public use of lands seaward of the MHTL and provides public access along and parallel to the sea and shoreline. Moreover, beach access is available at El Sol County Beach, located approximately 0.3 miles to the east and Nicolas Canyon County Beach, located approximately 0.6 miles to the west. The proposed project would not impede the ability of the public to reach and use public tidelands and coastal resources in the vicinity of the project site and therefore, no condition for lateral access has been required. Additionally, bluff-top, trail, and recreational access are not applicable given the subject property’s location.

Furthermore, the subject property and project do not meet any of the criteria described above in that no trails are identified on the LCP Park Lands Map on or adjacent to the property. No potential project-related or cumulative impacts on public access and/or recreation is anticipated to result from the proposed project. The proposed project conforms to the public access and recreational policies in Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976. Therefore, in accordance with LIP Section 12.6(B)(2), no conditions or findings for trail, lateral, vertical, bluff-top or recreational access are required, and the project complies with LIP Chapter 12.

J. Land Division (LIP Chapter 15)
This project does not include a land division. Therefore, the findings of LIP Chapter 15 are not applicable.
61

Page 23 of 23 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in CEQA, the Planning Director has analyzed the proposed project. The Planning Director found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The Planning Department found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The Planning Department found that this project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15303 (a) and (e) –New Construction and 15304 (b) – Minor Alterations to Land. The Planning Department has further determined that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

CORRESPONDENCE: To date, no correspondence has been received regarding this project.

PUBLIC NOTICE: On November 11, 2024, staff published a Notice of Public Hearing in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and mailed the notice to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property (Attachment 5).

SUMMARY: The required findings can be made that the project complies with the LCP.

Further, the Planning Department’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Based on the analysis contained in this report and the accompanying resolution, staff recommends approval of this project subject to the conditions of approval contained in Section 5 (Conditions of Approval) of Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-77. The project has been reviewed and conditionally approved for conformance with the LCP by Planning Department staff and appropriate City and County departments.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-77

2. Project Plans

3. Department Review Sheets

4. Story Pole Photos

5. Public Hearing Notice
62 ATTACHMENT 1

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 24-77

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

MALIBU DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT

FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND
APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 19-011 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 3,977.5 SQUARE FOOT, 28 FOOT HIGH TWOSTORY SINGLE-FAMILY HOME WITH BASEMENT, POOL, SPA,

RETAINING WALLS, NEW ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT
SYSTEM, AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT; INCLUDING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 24-022 FOR CONSTRUCTION OVER 18 FEET UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 28 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR A PITCHED ROOF AND MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 24-006 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK BY 50 PERCENT, FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL, TWO-ACRE (RR-2) ZONING DISTRICT AT 33610 PACIFIC

COAST HIGHWAY (PEACHES LLC)
The Planning Commission of the City of Malibu does hereby find, order and resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

A. On March 4, 2019, an application for Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 19- 011, Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 24-022, and Minor Modification (MM) No. 24-006 was submitted to the Planning Department by the applicant, Block and Block, on behalf of the property owner, Peaches LLC DBA. The application was routed to the City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Geotechnical Consultant Reviewers, City Public Works Department, Waterworks District No. 29 (WD29), and Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) for review.

B. On July 24, 2024, the applicant posted a Notice of CDP Application on the subject property and staff deemed the CDP application complete for processing.

C. On October 24, 2024, story poles representing the location and height of the new 2-story single-family residence were installed.

D. On November 8, 2024, Planning Department staff conducted a site visit to document site conditions, the property and surrounding area and to determine potential visual impacts of the proposed project on any scenic area, scenic road, or public viewing area.

F. On December 2, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, reviewed and considered the staff report, reviewed and considered written reports, public testimony, and other information in the record. 63 Resolution No 24-77

Page 2 of 22 ends

______________________
SECTION 2. Environmental Review.

Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission has analyzed the proposed project. The Planning Commission has found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA according to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303 (a) and (e) – New Construction – and Section 15304(b) – Minor Alterations to Land. The Planning Commission has further determined that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption applies to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

SECTION 3. Coastal Development Permit Findings.

Based on evidence contained within the record, including the agenda report for the project and the hearing on December 2, 2024, and pursuant to the Local Coastal Program (LCP) Local Implementation Plan (LIP) including Sections 13.7(B) and 13.9 and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC), the Planning Commission adopts the findings of fact, and approves CDP No. 19-011 for the construction of a new 3,977.5 square foot, 28 foot high two-story single-family home with basement, pool, spa, retaining walls, new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), and associated development; including SPR No. 24-022 for construction over 18 feet up to a maximum of 28 feet in height for a pitched roof and MM No. 24-006 to reduce the required front yard setback by 50 percent, for a property located in the Rural Residential, Two-Acre (RR-2) zoning district at 33610 Pacific Coast Highway (Peaches LLC).

The project is consistent with the LCP’s zoning, grading, cultural resources, water quality, and wastewater treatment requirements. With the inclusion of the proposed SPR, the project, as conditioned, has been determined to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals, and policies. The required findings are made herein.

A. General Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)

1. The project is located in the RR-2 zoning district, an area designated for rural residential uses. A single-family residence and associated development components are permitted uses. The proposed project has been reviewed for conformance with the LCP by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Geotechnical Reviewers, City Public Works Department, WD29, and LACFD. As discussed herein, based on submitted reports, project plans, visual analysis, and site investigations, the proposed project, as conditioned, conforms to the LCP and MMC in that it meets all applicable residential development standards with the inclusion of the requested SPR and MM.

2. The project is located between the first public road and the sea. However, the proposed project and related construction activities are not anticipated to interfere with the public’s right to access the coast as the site offers no direct or indirect public beach access. The proposed development of this property would be located atop a coastal bluff and inland canyon bluff. The upper three-fourths of the property is flatter than 5:1 and gently slopes from Pacific Coast Highway seaward to the south and east and then steeply descends, varying from 2 ½:1 or steeper for approximately 40 feet to the private access road to the south. The property is not subject to direct wave action but has been determined by the CCC and confirmed by the City of Malibu’s Coastal 64 Resolution No 24-77

Page 3 of 22 ends

______________________
Engineer that the steep slope to the south is a coastal bluff subject to Malibu Local Coastal Program (LCP) coastal bluff policies and standards. Adequate public access exists nearby, as the closest Park Lands to the site are El Sol County Beach approximately 0.3 miles to the east and Nicolas Canyon County Beach approximately 0.6 miles to the west. As such, no potential project-related or cumulative impact on public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976 are anticipated.

3. The proposed project meets the development policies of the LCP and MMC, with the inclusion of the SPR and MM, and has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging alternative and would actually provide for environmental enhancements by correcting historical issues on the sites slopes and developing site improvements that mitigate storm water flow across the site and minimizes erosion and sediment transport off-site.

B. Site Plan Review for Construction in Excess of 18 Feet in Height (LIP Section 13.27.5)

1. The project has been reviewed for conformance with all relevant policies and provisions of the LCP. Based on submitted reports, visual impact analysis, and a detailed site investigation, the project is consistent with all policies and provisions of the LCP and MMC, inclusive of the SPR and MM.

2. Story poles were installed in October of 2024. Staff visited the project site in November 2024, photo-documented the story poles, and evaluated the project for conformance with City codes. Properties in the vicinity of the subject property are predominantly developed with two-story single-family residences and accessory structures such as second units, detached garages, and swimming pools. The proposed grading will result in a lower finished grade which will decrease the building profile when viewed from PCH. Furthermore, as noted in Section A Finding 3, the proposed TDSF is considerably smaller than the adjacent property to the west and surrounding properties beyond, and will not adversely affect the neighborhood character with the proposed scale of development. Based on the existing development pattern in the area, the proposed project is expected to blend with the surrounding built environment. Based on the surrounding topography and existing development, the proposed project will blend with the surrounding built environment and will not have an adverse effect on neighborhood character. The neighboring properties are developed with one- and two-story single-family residences. Therefore, the project is similar in height and scale to other buildings in the same neighborhood.

3. The project provides maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by Chapter 6 of the Malibu LIP. The site is constrained by geological landslide areas, an irregular lot configuration, and the presence of coastal and canyon bluffs. Because the development cannot be sited completely below road grade to ensure the maximum protection of ocean views, the development proposes a view corridor double the size required by LIP Section 6.5 and will provide public visibility through the site as seen from PCH, a designated scenic roadway. The project is not expected to have significant impacts to scenic vistas and provides the maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by LIP Chapter 6.

4. As previously discussed in Section A, Finding 1, the project complies with all applicable requirements of the LCP. The Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Geotechnical Consultant Reviewers, LACFD and WD29 reviewed the proposed project and determined it was in conformance with the LCP and other State and local 65 Resolution No 24-77

Page 4 of 22 ends

______________________
requirements. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Building Safety Division will plan check the grading plans and structural plans for the residence and other improvements to verify conformance with State and local law. Construction of the proposed improvements will comply with all building code requirements and will incorporate all recommendations from applicable City and County agencies.

5. The proposed project, as designed, is consistent with the applicable land use designation, is consistent with all applicable development and design standards of the LCP and goals and policies of the General Plan because the project is located in an area that has been identified for residential use and the proposed residence incorporates siting and design measures to minimize visual impacts and landform alteration.

6. Based on the visual impact analysis (aerial photographs, site visits and story pole placement), staff has determined that the portions of the project above 18 feet in height are not expected to obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17). No nearby property owners have requested a primary view determination in response to the courtesy notice or story pole installation.

C. Minor Modification for a reduced front yard setback (LIP Section 13.27)

1. The project is consistent with the policies of the Malibu LCP in that the project has been reviewed and analyzed for conformance with the LCP. The project is consistent with the policies and provisions of the LCP and MMC. The project, with the inclusion of the requested MM, as designed and conditioned, conforms to all applicable LCP policies and provisions. A reduction in the front yard setback is needed to avoid construction on slopes 4 to 1 and steeper and that provides the required bluff retreat setback from the Coastal Bluff located on the southern portion of the site.

2. The project does not adversely affect neighborhood character. As previously stated in Section B, Finding 2, story poles were placed on the site to demonstrate the project’s potential for view impacts to the surrounding area. The proposed project consists of a new 3,977.5 square foot two-story single-family residence with a footprint of 2,636 square feet, pool, 8,761 square feet of landscaping, and associated development. The project site’s size coupled with geologic constraints and bluff setback requirements limits the ability to develop the site in any other manner than what is being proposed. The project’s height and bulk will not adversely affect neighborhood character. Additionally, the proposed TDSF is considerably smaller than the adjacent property to the west and surrounding properties beyond and will not adversely affect the neighborhood character with the proposed scale of development. The proposed structure complies with the residential development standards of the LCP and MMC, consistent with the RR-2 zoning designation, with the inclusion of the MM and SPR request. The building is designed and sited in a manner that allows for visual access to the ocean through creation of a view corridor, while allowing development of the highly constrained site. As stated earlier, the lot size, view corridor requirement, and seismic hazard area located along the southern portion of the property limit where development can be sited. Based on conformance with development standards, inclusive of the MM and SPR, along with project conditions for building, driveway, and wall materials and colors, 66 Resolution No 24-77

Page 5 of 22 ends

______________________
proposed site and building design characteristics, the surrounding topography, and surrounding existing development, the project is not expected to have an adverse effect on neighborhood character.

The City Biologist, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, WD29, and LACFD reviewed the proposed project and determined it was in conformance with State and local requirements. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Building Safety Division will plan check the grading plans and structural plans for the residence and other improvements to verify conformance with State and local law.

D. Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection (LIP Chapter 6)

1. The proposed project is a new two-story single-family residence on a vacant parcel currently developed with an existing single-family residence, in a neighborhood developed with single-family residences. As proposed, the project complies with the non-beachfront residential standards. Based on a staff site visit and analysis it was determined that due to the lot location, dimensions, and topography, there is no feasible alternative building site where the development would be obscured from view from a scenic area. The proposed project has been designed to provide a view corridor of 16 feet, 7 inches, which is approximately 42 percent of the lot’s frontage and more than twice the required width. LIP chapter 6 requires a view corridor of 20 percent of the lot frontage to ensure that the proposed development would not obstruct views to the ocean from PCH. Additionally, the proposed landscaping and pedestrian walkway along the west side of the project will not be visible from the scenic road; therefore, the proposed project has been determined not have a significant adverse scenic or visual impact as seen from PCH.

2. The project as conditioned will not have significant adverse scenic or visual impacts. The project has been conditioned to include limitations on lighting and colors of the materials used to prevent any visual impacts to scenic areas.

3. The project is the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative.

4. The project, as designed and conditioned, is not expected to adversely affect scenic and visual resources and no feasible alternatives would avoid or substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts on scenic and visual resources.

5. As discussed in Findings 1, 2, and 4 above, the project as proposed and conditioned, would not have significant adverse impacts on scenic and visual resources, nor eliminate, minimize or otherwise contribute to conformance to sensitive resource protection policies contained in the certified LCP.
67 Resolution No 24-77

Page 6 of 22 ends

______________________
E. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)

1. The project will not increase the instability of the site from geologic, flood, or fire hazards. The proposed development is suitable for the intended use provided that the certified engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer’s recommendations and governing agency’s building codes are followed.

3. The project, as designed and conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

5. The proposed project, as designed and conditioned, will not have adverse impacts on sensitive resources.

F. Shoreline and Bluff Development (LIP Chapter 10)

1. As previously discussed in Section A, Finding 2, the proposed project is not anticipated to interfere with public access to the ocean. The proposed development and related construction activities are at least 50 feet from the bluff edge and beach access is available at El Sol County Beach, located approximately 0.3 miles to the east and Nicolas Canyon County Beach, located approximately 0.6 miles to the west. No development is proposed on or near the shoreline sand supply or other resources as the development finished floor elevation (approximately 125 feet above sea level) will be 50 feet landward of the bluff edge. The proposed development complies with the reduced 50-foot setback from the coastal bluff edge pursuant to LIP 10.4(D) and the 25-foot setback from the canyon bluff pursuant to MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(6)(e) as the static factor of safety is greater than 1.5.

3. The project, as conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

4. As previously stated, the proposed project as designed, conditioned, and approved by City staff, the project will not have any significant adverse impacts on public access or shoreline 68 Resolution No 24-77

Page 7 of 22 ends

______________________
sand supply, or other resources.

SECTION 4. Planning Commission Action.

Based on the foregoing findings and evidence contained within the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves CDP No. 19-011, SPR No. 24-022 and MM No. 24-006, subject to the following conditions.

SECTION 5. Conditions of Approval.

2. Approval of this application is to allow for the project described herein. The scope of work approved includes:

3. Except as specifically changed by conditions of approval, the proposed development shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the approved scope of work, as described in Condition No. 2 and depicted on plans on file with the Planning Department date stamped July 8, 2024. The proposed development shall further comply with all conditions of approval stipulated in this resolution and Department Review Sheets attached hereto. In the event project plans conflict with any condition of approval, the condition shall take precedence.
69 Resolution No 24-77

Page 8 of 22 ends

______________________

4. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.18.2, this permit and rights conferred in this approval shall not be effective until the property owner signs, notarizes and returns the Acceptance of Conditions Affidavit accepting the conditions of approval set forth herein. The applicant shall file this form with the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any development permits.

5. The applicant shall digitally submit a complete set of plans to the Planning Department for consistency review and approval prior to plan check and again prior to the issuance of any building or development permits.

6. The CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three (3) years after issuance of the permit, unless a time extension has been granted. Extension of the permit may be granted by the approving authority for due cause. Extensions shall be requested in writing by the applicant or authorized agent prior to expiration of the three-year period and shall set forth the reasons for the request. In the event of an appeal, the CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three years from the date the appeal is decided by the decision-making body or withdrawn by the appellant.

7. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition of approval will be resolved by the Planning Director upon written request of such interpretation.

8. All development shall conform to requirements of the City of Malibu Environmental Sustainability Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, WD29 and LACFD, as applicable. Notwithstanding this review, all required permits shall be secured.

11. The property owner must submit payment for all outstanding fees payable to the City prior to issuance of any building permit, including grading or demolition.

12. The property owner shall comply with all provisions of the MMC and LIP.

Cultural Resources

Page 9 of 22 ends

______________________
Planning Director can review this information. Thereafter, the procedures contained in LIP Chapter 11 and those in MMC Section 17.54.040(D)(4)(b) shall be followed.

14. If human bone is discovered during geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease and the procedures described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code shall be followed. Section 7050.5 requires notification of the coroner. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, the applicant shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission by phone within 24 hours. Following notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, the procedures described in Section 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code shall be followed.

Lighting

15. Exterior lighting must comply with the Dark Sky Ordinance and shall be minimized, shielded, or concealed and restricted to low intensity features, so that no light source is directly visible from public view. Permitted lighting shall conform to the following standards:
a. Lighting for walkways shall be limited to fixtures that do not exceed two feet in height and are directed downward, and limited to 850 lumens (equivalent to a 60- watt incandescent bulb);
b. Security lighting controlled by motion detectors may be attached to the residence provided it is directed downward and is limited to 850 lumens; c. Driveway lighting shall be limited to the minimum lighting necessary for safe vehicular use. The lighting shall be limited to 850 lumens; d. Lights at entrances as required by the Building Code shall be permitted provided that such lighting does not exceed 850 lumens;
e. Site perimeter lighting shall be prohibited; and
f. Outdoor decorative lighting for aesthetic purposes is prohibited.

16. Night lighting for sports courts or other private recreational facilities shall be prohibited.

19. String lights are allowed in occupied dining and entertainment areas only and must not exceed 3,000 Kelvin.

20. Motion sensor lights shall be programmed to extinguish ten minutes after activation.

21. Three violations of the conditions by the same property owner will result in a requirement to permanently remove the outdoor light fixture(s) from the site. 71 Resolution No 24-77

Page 10 of 22 ends

______________________

22. Up-lighting of landscaping is prohibited.

Fencing/Walls/Screening

23. Any above-ground equipment shall be screened from view by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A).

25. The height of fences and walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A). No retaining wall shall exceed six feet in height or 12 feet in height for a combination of two or more walls.

26. New boundary fencing of any single area exceeding ½ acre shall be of an open rail-type design with a wooden rail at the top (instead of wire), be less than 40 inches high, and have a space greater than 14 inches between the ground and the bottom post or wire. A split rail design that blends with the natural environment is preferred.

Construction / Framing

27. The applicant/property owner shall contract with a City approved hauler to facilitate the recycling of all recoverable/recyclable material. Recoverable material shall include but shall not be limited to: asphalt, dirt and earthen material, lumber, concrete, glass, metals, and drywall.

29. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall confirm with the City Building Official if a Los Angeles County Fire Department compliant second egress point from the basement will be required and shall update plans accordingly should that be required.

31. A construction staging plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to plan check submittal.

Page 11 of 22 ends

______________________

34. All new development, including construction, grading, and landscaping shall be designed to incorporate drainage and erosion control measures prepared by a licensed engineer that incorporate structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control the volume, velocity and pollutant load of storm water runoff in compliance with all requirements contained in LIP Chapter 17, including:
a. Construction shall be phased to the extent feasible and practical to limit the amount of disturbed areas present at a given time.
b. Grading activities shall be planned during the southern California dry season (April through October).
c. During construction, contractors shall be required to utilize sandbags and berms to control runoff during on-site watering and periods of rain in order to minimize surface water contamination.
d. Filter fences designed to intercept and detain sediment while decreasing the velocity of runoff shall be employed within the project site.

36. For the transportation of heavy construction equipment and/or material, which requires the use of oversized-transport vehicles on State highways, the applicant / property owner is required to obtain a transportation permit from the California Department of Transportation.

Biology/Landscaping

38. Prior to installation of any landscaping, the applicant shall obtain a plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division. 73 Resolution No 24-77

Page 12 of 22 ends

______________________

17.53.030). The certificate shall include the property owner’s signed acceptance of responsibility for maintaining the landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans and MMC Section 17.53.030.

41. Prior to Final Plan Check Approval, if your property is serviced by the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29, please provide landscape water use approval from that department.

43. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to obstruct the primary view from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth). The planting plan must adhere to the view corridor requirements for the property.

44. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City of Malibu, are prohibited.

45. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.

46. Native species of the Santa Monica Mountains, characteristic of the local habitat, shall be used on graded slopes or where slope plantings are required for slope stabilization, erosion control, and watershed protection. Plants should be selected to have a variety of rooting depths. A spacing of 15 feet between large woody (≥10-foot canopy) shrubs is recommended by the Fire Department. Lawns are prohibited on slopes > 5%.

48. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote and copper arsenate.

Page 13 of 22 ends

______________________
a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. A report discussing the results of nesting bird surveys shall be submitted to the City within two business days of completing the surveys.

Fire Department/Fuel Modification

51. The project shall receive LACFD approval of a Final Fuel Modification Plan prior to the issuance of final building permits.

52. The project is required to have an interior automatic sprinkler system.

Public Works

53. Clearing and grading during the rainy season (extending from November 1 to March 31) shall be prohibited for development that:
a. Is located within or adjacent to ESHA, or
b. Includes grading on slopes greater than 4 to 1.

Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4 to 1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading operations before the rainy season. If grading operations are not completed before the rainy season begins, grading shall be halted and temporary erosion control measures shall be put into place to minimize erosion until grading resumes after March 31, unless the City determines that completion of grading would be more protective of resources.

Page 14 of 22 ends

______________________
grading equipment beyond the limits of grading shall be included within the area delineated;
e. If the property contains rare, endangered or special status species as identified in the Biological Assessment, this plan shall contain a prominent note identifying the areas to be protected (to be left undisturbed). Fencing of these areas shall be delineated on this plan as required by the City Biologist; f. The grading limits shall include the temporary cuts made for retaining walls, buttresses and over excavations for fill slopes; and
g. Public storm drain systems shall be shown on this plan. Systems greater than 12 inch in diameter shall also have a plan and profile for the system included with this plan.

56. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMP’s shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show allstorm drain lines, inlets, outlet, postconstruction BMP’s and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements.

57. The ocean between Latigo Point and the west City limits has been established by the State Water Resources Control Board as an Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) as part of the California Ocean Plan. This designation prohibits the discharge of any waste, including stormwater runoff, directly into the ASBS. The applicant shall provide a drainage system that accomplishes the following:
a. Installation of BMPs that are designed to treat the potential pollutants in the stormwater runoff so that it does not alter the natural ocean water quality. These pollutants include trash, oil and grease, metals, bacteria, nutrients, pesticides, herbicides and sediment.
b. Prohibits the discharge of trash.
c. Only discharges from existing storm drain outfalls are allowed. No new outfalls will be allowed. Any proposed or new storm water discharged shall be routed to existing storm drain outfalls and shall not result in any new contribution of waste to the ASBS (i.e., no additional pollutant loading).
d. Elimination of non-storm water discharges.

Page 15 of 22 ends

______________________
Stockpile Management
Spill Prevention and Control
Solid Waste Management
Concrete Waste Management
Sanitary/Septic Waste Management
All BMPs shall be in accordance to the latest version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) BMP Handbook. Designated areas for the storage of construction materials, solid waste management, and portable toilets must not disrupt drainage patterns or subject the material to erosion by site runoff.

59. A Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) is required for this project. Storm drainage improvements are required to mitigate increased runoff generated by property development. The applicant shall have the choice of one method specified within the City’s Local Implementation Plan Section 17.3.2.B.2. The SWMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage of the site. The SWMP shall identify the Site design and Source control Best Management Practices (BMP’s) that have been implemented in the design of the project (See LIP Chapter 17 Appendix A). The SWMP shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading/building permits for this project.

60. A Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted for review and approval of the Public Works Director. The WQMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage on the site. The QQMP shall meet all the requirements of the City’s current Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System (MS4) permit. The following elements shall be included within the WQMP:
a. Site Design BMPs:
b. Source Control BMPs;
c. Treatment Control BMPs that retain on-site Stormwater Quality Design Volume (SWQDv). Or where it is technically infeasible to retain on-site, the project must biofiltrate 1.5 times the SWQDv that is not retained on-site; d. Drainage improvements;
e. A plan for the maintenance and monitoring of the proposed treatment BMPs for the expected life of the structure;
f. Methods of onsite percolation, site re-vegetation and an analysis for off-site project impacts;
g. Measures to treat and infiltrate runoff from impervious areas; h. A copy of the WQMP shall be filed against the property to provide constructive notice to future property owners of their obligation to maintain the water quality measure installed during construction prior to the issuance of grading or building permits; and
i. The WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and the fee applicable at the time of submittal for review of the WQMP shall be paid prior to the start of the technical review. The WQMP shall be approved prior the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading and drainage plan and/or building plans. The Public Works Department will tentatively approve the plan and will keep 77 Resolution No 24-77

Page 16 of 22 ends

______________________
a copy until the completion of the project. Once the project is completed, the applicant shall verify the installation of the BMP’s, make any revisions to the WQMP, and resubmit to the Public Works Department for approval. The original signed and notarized document shall be recorded with the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. A certified copy of the WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

Geology

Swimming Pool / Spa / Mechanical Equipment

63. Onsite noise, including that which emanates from swimming pool and air conditioning equipment, shall be limited as described in MMC Chapter 8.24 (Noise).

64. Pool and air conditioning equipment that will be installed shall be screened from view by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section

3.5.3(A).

65. All swimming pools shall contain double walled construction with drains and leak detection systems capable of sensing a leak of the inner wall.

66. The discharge of swimming pool, spa and decorative fountain water and filter backwash, including water containing bacteria, detergents, wastes, algaecides, or other chemicals is prohibited. Swimming pool, spa, and decorative fountain water may be used as landscape irrigation only if the following items are met:
a. The discharge water is dechlorinated, debrominated or if the water is disinfected using ozonation;
b. There are sufficient BMPs in place to prevent soil erosion; and c. The discharge does not reach into the MS4 or to the ASBS (including tributaries).

67. Discharges not meeting the above-mentioned methods must be trucked to a Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Works.

68. A sign stating “It is illegal to discharge pool, spa, or water feature waters to a street, drainage course, or storm drain per MMC Section 13.04.060(D)(5)” shall be posted in the filtration and/or pumping equipment area for the property. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall indicate the method of disinfection and the method of discharging.
78 Resolution No 24-77

Page 17 of 22 ends

______________________
Environmental Health

69. Final OWTS Plot Plan: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a final OWTS plot plan prepared by a City Registered OWTS Designer shall be submitted showing an OWTS design meeting the minimum requirements of the MMC and the LCP, including necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property and the proposed landscape plan for the developed property. The OWTS plot plan shall show essential features of the OWTS and must fit onto an 11-inch by 17-inch sheet leaving a five-inch margin clear to provide space for a City applied legend. If the scale of the plans is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details and/or all necessary setbacks, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inches by 22 inches).

71. The final design report shall contain the following information (in addition to the items listed above).
a. Required treatment capacity for wastewater treatment and disinfection systems.

The treatment capacity shall be specified in terms of flow rate, gallons per day, and shall be supported by calculations relating the treatment capacity to the number of bedroom equivalents, plumbing drainage fixture equivalents, and the subsurface effluent dispersal system acceptance rate. The drainage fixture unit count must be clearly identified in association with the design treatment capacity, even if the design is based on the number of bedrooms. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the treatment system shall be specified in the final design; b. Sewage and effluent pump design calculations (as applicable). c. Description of proposed wastewater treatment and/or disinfection system equipment. State the proposed type of treatment system(s) (e.g., aerobic treatment, textile filter ultraviolet disinfection, etc.); major components, manufacturers, and model numbers for "package" systems; and conceptual design for custom engineered systems;
d. Specifications, supporting geology information, and percolation test results for the subsurface effluent dispersal portion of the onsite wastewater disposal system. This must include the proposed type of effluent dispersal system (drainfield, trench, seepage pit subsurface drip, etc.) as well as the system’s geometric dimensions and basic construction features. Supporting calculations shall be presented that relate the results of soils analysis or percolation/infiltration tests to the projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate, including any unit conversions or safety factors. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the effluent dispersal system shall be specified in the final design. The projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate shall be reported in units of total gallons per day and gallons per square foot 79 Resolution No 24-77

Page 18 of 22 ends

______________________
per day. Specifications for the subsurface effluent dispersal system shall be shown to accommodate the design hydraulic loading rate (i.e., average and peak OWTS effluent flow, reported in units of gallons per day). The subsurface effluent dispersal system design must take into account the number of bedrooms, fixture units and building occupancy characteristics; and
e. All final design drawings shall be submitted with the wet signature and typed name of the OWTS designer. If the scale of the plan is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inch by 22 inch, for review by Environmental Health). Note:

For OWTS final designs, full-size plans are required for review by the Building Safety Division and/or the Planning Department.

72. Proof of Ownership: Proof of ownership of subject property shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator.

76. Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant Approval: Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

77. City of Malibu Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant Approval: City of Malibu geotechnical staff final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

78. City of Malibu Public Works Approval: City of Malibu Public Works final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

79. City of Malibu Planning Approval: City of Malibu Planning Department final approval of the OWTS plan shall be obtained.
80 Resolution No 24-77

Page 19 of 22 ends

______________________

83. Final OWTS Plot Plan: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a final OWTS plot plan shall be submitted showing an AOWTS design meeting the minimum requirements of the Malibu Plumbing Code (MPC) and the LCP, including necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property and the proposed landscape plan for the developed property. The AOWTS plot plan shall show essential features of the AOWTS and must fit onto an 11-inch by 17-inch sheet leaving a five-inch margin clear to provide space for a City applied legend. If the scale of the plans is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details and/or all necessary setbacks, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inches by 22 inches).

84. Final OWTS Design Report, Plans, and System Specifications: If the OWTS design and/or bedroom/drainage fixture unit counts are modified in any way subsequent to the Planningstage review, then a final design and system specifications shall be submitted as to all components (i.e., alarm system, pumps, timers, flow equalization devices, backflow devices, etc.) proposed for use in the construction of the proposed OWTS. For all OWTS, final design drawings and calculations must be signed by a California registered civil engineer, a registered environmental health specialist or a professional geologist who is responsible for the design. The designer must also be a registered OWTS designer with the City of Malibu. The final OWTS design report and drawings shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator with the designer’s wet signature, professional registration number and stamp (if applicable).

Water Service

85. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an updated Will Serve Letter from Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 to the Planning Department indicating the ability of the property to receive adequate water service.

Prior to Occupancy

86. Prior to a final Building inspection, the applicant shall provide a Recycling Summary Report (Summary Report) and obtain the approval from the Environmental Sustainability Department.

Applicant must provide haul tickets and diversion information. The final Summary Report shall 81 Resolution No 24-77

Page 20 of 22 ends

______________________
designate the specific materials that were land filled or recycled and state the facilities where all materials were taken.

87. The applicant shall request a final Planning Department inspection prior to final inspection by the City of Malibu Building Safety Division. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until the Planning Department has determined that the project complies with this coastal development permit. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be granted at the discretion of the Planning Director, provided adequate security has been deposited with the City to ensure compliance should the final work not be completed in accordance with this permit.

88. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the City Biologist shall inspect the project site and determine that all Planning Department conditions to protect natural resources are in compliance with the approved plans.

View Corridor

90. Pursuant to LIP Section 6.5(E)(1)(e) and in order to ensure the protection of scenic and visual resources, the project is conditioned as follows:
a. Structures shall extend no higher than the road grade of PCH adjacent to the project site in the area of the View Corridor.
b. Fences shall be located away from the road edge and fences or walls shall be no higher than adjacent road grade of PCH, with the exception of fences that are composed of visually permeable design and material.
c. The project site shall be landscaped with native vegetation types that have a maximum growth height at maturity and are located such that landscaping will not extend above PCH road grade.
d. Existing vegetation shall be removed, or trimmed and maintained in perpetuity so as not to extend above the adjacent road elevation of PCH.

91. Pursuant to LIP Section 6.5(E)(2)(e) and in order to ensure the protection of scenic and visual resources, the applicant is required to maintain:
a. A view corridor a minimum of 16 feet 7 inches adjacent to the western property line extending the length of the property.
b. No portion of any structure shall extend into the view corridor above the elevation of the adjacent street.
c. Any fencing across the view corridor shall be permanently maintained as visually permeable. Tinted or frosted glass, and louvered or slatted screen fences are not permitted.
d. Any landscaping in this area shall include only low-growing species that will not obscure or block bluewater views.
e. If at any time the property owner allows the view corridor to become impaired or blocked, it would constitute a violation of the coastal development permit and the Coastal Act and be subject to all civil and criminal remedies. 82 Resolution No 24-77

Page 21 of 22 ends

______________________
Fixed Conditions

92. This coastal development permit shall run with the land and bind all future owners of the property.

93. Violation of any of the conditions of this approval may be cause for revocation of this permit and termination of all rights granted there under.

Deed Restrictions

94. The property owner is required to execute and record a deed restriction which shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs and expenses of liability arising out of the acquisition, design, construction, operation, maintenance, existence or failure of the permitted project in an area where an extraordinary potential for damage or destruction from wildfire exists as an inherent risk to life and property. The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to Planning Department staff prior to final Planning Department approval.

95. Prior to final Planning Department approval, the applicant shall be required to execute and record a deed restriction reflecting lighting requirements set forth in Condition Nos. 15-22.

The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to the Planning Department prior to final Planning Department approval.

SECTION 6. The Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 2024. ________________________________________
DREW LEONARD, Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________________
REBECCA EVANS, Recording Secretary
83 Resolution No 24-77

Page 22 of 22 ends

______________________
LOCAL APPEAL - Pursuant to Local Coastal Program Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Section

13.20.1 (Local Appeals) a decision made by the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by an aggrieved person by written statement setting forth the grounds for appeal. An appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within 10 days and shall be accompanied by an appeal form and filing fee, as specified by the City Council. Appeal forms may be found online at www.malibucity.org, in person at City Hall, or by calling (310) 456-2489, ext. 246.

COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL – An aggrieved person may appeal the Planning Commission’s approval to the Coastal Commission within 10 working days of the issuance of the City’s Notice of Final Action. Appeal forms may be found online at www.coastal.ca.gov or by calling (805) 585-1800. Such an appeal must be filed with the Coastal Commission, not the City.

I CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION NO. 24-77 was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Malibu at the regular meeting held on the 2nd day of December 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________________
REBECCA EVANS, Recording Secretary
84 ƒ
SHEET
SCALE:

JOB NO:

DRAWN: LC ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S 889 Pierce Court, Suite 101, Thousand Oaks, California 91360 818-991-7148 805-497-1244 lcegroupinc.com [email protected] CIVI L STRUCTURAL GEOTECHNI CAL 8150
MM 33616 MALIBU LLC 33610 PACIFIC COAST HWY MALIBU, CA
DATE: 6/25/2024
C 2.1
1"=10' ENLARGED GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
85 ATTACHMENT 2
SHEET SCALE: JOB NO: DRAWN:

LC ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.

C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
889 Pierce Court, Suite 101, Thousand Oaks, California 91360 818-991-7148 805-497-1244 lcegroupinc.com [email protected] CIVI L STRUCTURAL GEOTECHNI CAL 8150 MM
33616 MALIBU LLC
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWY
MALIBU, CA DATE: 6/25/2024 C 1.0N.T.S. COVER SHEET
6/25/2024 03/07/24
1 05/25/2023 CDP_rev 1
2 10/27/2024 CDP_rev 2
3 02/06/2024 CDP_rev 3
4 03/07/2024 CDP_rev 4
7/8/2024
86 ƒ
SHEET
SCALE:

JOB NO:

DRAWN: LC ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S 889 Pierce Court, Suite 101, Thousand Oaks, California 91360 818-991-7148 805-497-1244 lcegroupinc.com [email protected] CIVI L STRUCTURAL GEOTECHNI CAL 8150
MM 33616 MALIBU LLC 33610 PACIFIC COAST HWY MALIBU, CA
DATE: 6/25/2024
C 2.0OVERALL SITE PLAN
1"=20'
03/07/24 1 05/25/2023 CDP_rev 1 2 10/27/2024 CDP_rev 2 3 02/06/2024 CDP_rev 3 4 03/07/2024 CDP_rev 4 4 87 ƒ
SHEET
SCALE:

JOB NO:

DRAWN: LC ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S 889 Pierce Court, Suite 101, Thousand Oaks, California 91360 818-991-7148 805-497-1244 lcegroupinc.com [email protected] CIVI L STRUCTURAL GEOTECHNI CAL 8150
MM 33616 MALIBU LLC 33610 PACIFIC COAST HWY MALIBU, CA
DATE: 6/25/2024
C 2.2BASEMENT GRADING PLAN
1"=10'
03/07/24 1 05/25/2023 CDP_rev 1 2 10/27/2024 CDP_rev 2 3 02/06/2024 CDP_rev 3 4 03/07/2024 CDP_rev 4 89 (No roof runoff or concentrated runoff)
SHEET
SCALE:

JOB NO:

DRAWN: LC ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S 889 Pierce Court, Suite 101, Thousand Oaks, California 91360 818-991-7148 805-497-1244 lcegroupinc.com [email protected] CIVI L STRUCTURAL GEOTECHNI CAL 8150
MM 33616 MALIBU LLC 33610 PACIFIC COAST HWY MALIBU, CA
DATE: 6/25/2024
C 3.0DETAILS
N.T.S.
03/07/24
90 60'
0 0
0 FRONT YARD SETBACK
40'-6"

WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK
16'-8"
BLUFF 50' SETBACK LINE
50% DISCRETIONARY REDUCTION33610 PCH
EAS
T
SID
E
YA
R
D
S
E
T
BAC
K
11'-1"

LOT WIDTH
110'-11"

LOT DEPTH
202'-6"

REAR YARD SETBACK
30'-4 1/2" BLUFF TOP LINE
ACST ACOUSTICALAD AREA DRAINADJ ADJUSTABLEA.F.F. ABOVE FINISHED FLOORA.F.G. ABOVE FINISHED GRADEA.H.U. AIR HANDLING UNITALT ALTERNATEALUM ALUMINUMANOD ANODIZEDAPPROX APPROXIMATEARCH ARCHITECT, ARCHITECTURALAUTO AUTOMATICA.V. AUDIO VISUAL BD BOARDBLDG BUILDINGBLKG BLOCKINGB.O. BOTTOM OFBOT BOTTOMBRG BEARINGBRZ BRONZEBSMT BASEMENTBYND BEYONDCAB CABINETCB CATCH BASINCEM CEMENT, CEMENTITIOUSCER CERAMICCH COAT HOOKCI CAST IRONCJ CONTROL JOINTCIP CAST-IN-PLACECL CENTERLINECLG CEILINGCLR CLEARCMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNITCO CLEAN OUTCOL COLUMNCOMM COMMUNICATIONCONC CONCRETECONN CONNECTION, CONNECTCONSTR CONSTRUCTIONCONT CONTINUOUS, CONTINUECSWK CASEWORKCTR CENTERCU CUBICD DEEP, DEPTHDBL DOUBLEDEMO DEMOLISH, DEMOLITIONDTL DETAILDIAM DIAMETERDIAG DIAGONAL, DIAGRAMDIM DIMENSIONDIV DIVIDE, DIVISIONDLO DAYLIGHT OPENINGDMPF DAMPPROOF, DAMPPROOFINGDN DOWNDR DOORDS DOWNSPOUTDW DISHWASHERDWG DRAWINGDWR DRAWEREJ EXPANSION JOINTELEV ELEVATIONELEC ELECTRIC, ELECTRICALENCL ENCLOSE, ENCLOSUREE.O. EDGE OFE.O.S. EDGE OF STONE (STONE DWGS)EP ELECTRIC PANELEQ EQUALEQUIP EQUIPMENTEXH EXHAUSTEXP EXPANSION, EXPOSED(E) EXISTINGF.A.R. FLOOR AREA RATIOF.D. FLOOR DRAINF.D.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONFDTN FOUNDATIONF.E. FIRE EXTINGUISHERF.E.C. FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETF.F. FINISH FLOORF.H. FIRE HYDRANTF.H.C. FIRE HOSE CABINETFIG FIGUREFIN FINISH, FINISHEDFLEX FLEXIBLEFLR FLOOR, FLOORINGF.O. FACE OF, FINISHED OPENINGFOS FACE OF STONE (STONE DWGS)FOW FACE OF WALL (STONE DWGS)FP FIRE PROTECTION, FIREPROOFF.P. FIRE PLACEFR FRAME, FIRE-RATEDFRMG FRAMINGFR.T. FIRE-RETARDANT TREATEDFT FOOT, FEETFTG FOOTINGF.V.C. FIRE HOSE VALVE CABINETFW FRAME WIDTHGA GAGEGALV GALVANIZEDGEN GENERAL, GENERATORGFRC GLASS-FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETEGL GLASSGVL GRAVELGYP GYPSUMGYP BD GYPSUM BOARDH.B. HOSE BIBBHDBD HARDBOARDHDWR HARDWAREHDWD HARDWOODH.M. HOLLOW METALHO HOLD OPENHORIZ HORIZONTALHR HOURHT HEIGHTHVAC HEATING VENTILATING &

AIR CONDITIONING
I.D. INSIDE DIAMETERIN INCHINCL INCLUDE, INCLUDINGINFO INFORMATIONINSUL INSULATE, INSULATIONINT INTERIORI.W.D. INDIRECT WASTE DRAIN JT JOINTLAM LAMINATE, LAMINATEDLAV LAVATORYL.L. LOWER LEVELLT LIGHTLTG LIGHTINGMAS MASONRYM.L. MAIN LEVELMATL MATERIALMAX MAXIMUMMECH MECHANICALMED MEDIUMMEMB MEMBRANEMFR MANUFACTUREMH MANHOLEMin MINIMUM, MINUTEMISC MISCELLANEOUSMGO MASTER GRID ORIGINMO MASONRY OPENINGMT MOUNT/MOUNTINGMTD MOUNTEDMTL METALN.I.C. NOT IN CONTACTNO NUMBERNOM NOMINALN.T.S. NOT TO SCALEo/ OVERO OWNERO.C. ON CENTERO. D. OUTSIDE DIAMETEROPNG OPENINGOPP OPPOSITEO.R.D. OVERFLOW ROOF DRAINO.T.B. OPEN TO BELOWO.T.S. OPEN TO STRUCTURE ABOVEPERP PERPENDICULARPLY PLYWOODPNL PANELPL PROPERTY LINEPRKG PARKINGPROP PROPERTYPNT PAINT, POINTP.T. PRESSURE TREATEDPTD PAINTEDPTN PARTITIONR RADIUS, RISERRCP REFLECTED CEILING PLANR.D. ROOF DRAIN, ROADREF REFER TO, REFERENCEREINF REINFORCED, REINFORCINGREQD REQUIREDREV REVISED, REVISIONRFG ROOFINGRM ROOMR.O. ROUGH OPENINGS.AV.D. SEE AUDIO VISUAL DRAWINGSSBSTR SUBSTRATES.C.D. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSSCWD SOLID CORE WOODSCHED SCHEDULESD STORM DRAINSECT SECTIONS.E.D. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGSSHT SHEETSHTHG SHEATHINGSIM SIMILARS.L.D. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGSS.LTG.D. SEE LIGHTING DRAWINGSS.M.D. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGSSPEC SPECIFICATIONSPD SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGSSPKLR SPRINKLERSPKR SPEAKERSQ SQUARES.R.D. SEE RADON DRAWINGSS.R.N. SEE RADON NARRATIVES.S. STAINLESS STEELSSD SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGSS.T.C. SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASSSTL STEELSTOR STORAGESTRUCT STRUCTURALSUSP SUSPENDEDT TREADT&G TONGUE & GROOVETEL TELEPHONETEMP TEMPERATURE, TEMPORARYTHK THICK, THICKNESSTMPD TEMPEREDT.O. TOP OFT.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETET.O.S. TOP OF STEELT.S. TOPPING SLABTSTAT THERMOSTATTV TELEVISIONTYP/Typ TYPICALUGND UNDERGROUNDU.L. UPPER LEVELUNFIN UNFINISHEDU.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDVB VAPOR BARRIERVERT VERTICALVEST VESTIBULEV.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD or w/ ARCH PRIOR TO CONSTRVNR VENEERVR VAPOR RETARDER(V) EQUAL TO V.I.F. ABOVEW WIDE, WATTw/ WITHw/o WITHOUTWS WALL STEPW.C. WATER CLOSETWD WOODWDI WATER DESIGN INC (Consultant)W.H. WATER HEATERW.O. WHERE OCCURSWP WEATHERPROOF, WATERPROOF,

WATERPROOFING, WORK POINT
WR WATER RESISTANTWRM BD 'WARMBOARD' (PRODUCT MFR)WT WEIGHTW.W.M. WELDED WIRE MESHXFMR TRANSFORMER 1 ROOM NAME
101
AFF
LEVEL 1
ACT1
12' - 10"
A3.00
1 SIM
A4.00
1 A5.00
1 1

COLUMN LINE/GRID INDICATORGRID INDICATOR - FACE OF FINISHBENCHMARK/LEVEL SYMBOLNORTH ARROW (PROJECT NORTH)INTERIOR ELEVATION SYMBOLBUILDING SECTION SYMBOL

WALL SECTION SYMBOLDETAIL REFERENCE SYMBOLROOM TAG SYMBOLSWALL TYPEDOOR SYMBOLWINDOW SYMBOLCEILING TYPE/HEIGHT SYMBOL A3.00 1 BUILDING ELEVATION SYMBOL
A1aa
A7.00 1

PROJECT
201A
XX

DIMENSION POINT / WORK POINT

LEVEL NAMELEVEL HEIGHT
OWNER CONTACTPEACHES, LLC BRAD KEYWELL47 W. DIVISION STREET, #36 773 251 9999 CHICAGO, IL 60610 [email protected]

ARCHITECT
STUDY ARCHITECTS JOE DINAPOLI81 LANGTON ST., UNIT 11 908.380.9494 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 [email protected] TESSIER LANDSCAPE DESIGN MARK TESSIER1424 4TH STREET, STE 300 310.395.3595 SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 [email protected] ENGINEERING MICHELLE MEEHAN889 PIERCE CT., STE 101 805.497.1244THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91360 [email protected] STRUCTURES DENNY KWAN523 WEST 6TH ST, STE 1122 415.796.7108LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 [email protected] CONSULTANTS KEVIN POFFENBARGER20722 MAIN ST. 310.241.6565CARSON, CA 90745 [email protected] RUDY F. RUBERTI6634 VALJEAN AVE. 818.370.2047VAN NUYS, CA 91406 [email protected]. STREET, CITY, ST ZIPWASTEWATERTBDNO. STREET, CITY, ST ZIP 33616 PCH33610 PCH

PACIFIC
COAST
HIG
HWAY
STREET ADDRESS: 33610 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
MALIBU, CA 90265
OWNER: PEACHES LLCLEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE SITE SURVEY
A.P.N.: 4473-021-12
ZONING: RR-2FIRE ZONE: VHFHSZOCCUPANCY GROUP: R-3 / UTYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VBNUMBER OF STORIES: 2 STORIES W/ BASEMENTSPRINKLERED: YESLOT AREA (GROSS): 19,482 SF / 0.45 ACRESLOT AREA (NET): 16,854 SF / 0.39 ACRESLOT WIDTH/DEPTH: WIDTH: 110' 11" DEPTH: 202' 6"
SETBACKS: FRONT YARD: REQUIRED: 40' 6"
PROPOSED: 20' 3"(50% DISCRETIONARY FRONT SETBACK REDUCTION) REAR YARD: REQUIRED: 30' 4.5"
PROPOSED: 30' 4.5"
SIDE YARDS: REQUIRED:

CUMULATIVE FOR BOTH SIDES: 25% OF 110' 11" = 27' 9"PROPOSED E: 11' 1"(10%)PROPOSED W: 16' 8"(15%) PARKING: ENCLOSED: REQUIRED: 2
PROPOSED: 2
UNENCLOSED: REQUIRED: 2
PROPOSED: 2
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 1993 DATUM
ALLOWABLE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE:
16,854 X 0.177 = 2,983 + 1000 SFT.D.S.F. = 3,983 SF
PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE TABULATION:

LOWER LEVEL: 145.5 SF
(1,291 SF - 1,000 SF @ 50% = 145.5 SF )
MAIN LEVEL: 2,636 SFUPPER LEVEL: 1,196 SFTOTAL PROPOSED: 3,977.5 SF (<3,983 SF) PROPOSED STRUCTURE HEIGHTS (ABOVE EXISTING NATURAL GRADE):
(SEE BULK AREA CALCULATION)REQUIRED MAX: 28' 0" PROPOSED: 28' 0" BULK AREA TABULATION (2/3'S RULE):

AREA BELOW 18': 2,636 SF
MAXIMUM AREA ALLOWED OVER 18' (2,636 SF X .667): 1,758 SF AREA OVER 18': 1,710 SF

PROPOSED UNENCLOSED COVERED
AREAS UNDER 6': 749 SF
IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE:

TOTAL ALLOWABLE: 16,854 X .35 = 5,899 SFTOTAL PROPOSED: 3,860 SF - BLDG FOOTPRINT - 2,636 SF- HARDSCAPE - 944 SF- POOL - 280 SF 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES (RESIDENTIAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CODES), AS AMENDED BY THE 2017 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE, AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF MALIBU.- TITLE 24, PART 6 - 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE- 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS- 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE- 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE- 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE- 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE SEAL
PROJECT NO.SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBERDATEISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNERPeaches, LLC47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

ARCHITECT
STUDY Architects81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103LANDSCAPEMark Tessier Landscape Design1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVILLC Engineering889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101Thousand Oaks, CA 91360STRUCTURALHolmes Structures523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122Los Angeles, CA 90014SEPTICEPD Consultants20722 Main St.Carson, CA 90745GEOTECHGeosoils6634 Valjean Ave.Van Nuys, CA 91406MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBINGCompany NameNo. Street, City, ST ZIPLIGHTINGCompany NameNo. Street, City, ST ZIPA1A2A3 A4A5A6A7A8A9DRAWING SERIES

SITEPLANS & RCPSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBUILDING SECTIONSWALL SECTIONSTYPICAL DETAILSINTERIOR ELEVATIONSDETAILSSCHEDULES

REVISIONS

RENEWAL
DATE
10/31/23
C-37488

DANIEL R
YODER

LICENSED
A

RCHITECT
IA NR
IFO
OF
C
AL
ETATS

COVER SHEET
A0.00
CDP REV 4
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWYMALIBU, CA 90265
03 JULY 2024
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
Author

ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS

SETBACK ANALYSIS VICINITY MAPSYMBOLS PROJECT TEAM
UPDATED PROJECT SUBMISSION TO COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CDP 19-011 TO CONSTRUCT A NEW TWO STORY, 28' HIGH, 3,983 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE INCLUDING A 1,291 SQUARE FOOT BASEMENT, GRADING, SITE WALLS, NEW ENTRY GATE, HARDSCAPE, LANDSCAPING, SWIMMING POOL, OUTDOOR LIGHTING AND NEW ALTERNATIVE ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. A MINOR MODIFICATION IS REQUESTED TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK BY 50 PERCENT.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
33610 PCH RESIDENCE

MALIBU, CALIFORNIA

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

SHEET INDEX

ISSUED SHEET
○ ISSUED SHEET - FOR REFERENCE ONLY
●
SHEET NO. SHEET NAME
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - 03.18.2022

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT 2
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT 3

ARCHITECTURAL
A0.00 COVER SHEET ● ● ● ●A0.01 AREA PLANS ● ● ● ●A0.02 SLOPE ANALYSIS ● ● ● ●A0.04 LIP ANALYSIS ● ●A1.01 SITE PLAN ● ● ● ●A1.04 ROOF PLAN ● ● ● ●A2.01 FLOOR PLANS ● ● ● ●A2.02 FLOOR PLANS ● ● ● ●A3.01 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ● ● ● ●A4.01 BUILDING SECTIONS ● ● ● ● CIVIL
C1.0 COVER SHEET ● ● ● ●C2.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN ● ● ● ●C2.1 ENLARGED GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN ● ● ● ●C2.2 BASEMENT GRADING PLAN ● ● ● ●C3.0 DETAILS ● ● ●S EPTIC
W0.00 ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM SITE PLAN ● ● ● ●W0.01 ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM SITE PLAN ● ● ● ●L

ANDSCAPE
L0.00 LANDSCAPE COVER SHEET ● ● ● ●L0.30 SURVEY ● ● ● ●L2.00 HARDSCAPE FENCING PLAN ● ● ● ●L2.10 HARDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT ● ● ● ●L2.20 LIGHTING ENLARGEMENT ● ● ● ●L2.30 VIEW CORRIDOR DIAGRAM ● ●L5.00 PLANTING PLAN WITH FUEL MODIFICATION Z
ONES
● ● ● ●
L5.10 PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN ● ● ● ●L7.10 IRRIGATION PLAN ● ● ● ●L7.20 IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES ● ● ● ●L7.30 IRRIGATION DETAILS ● ● ● ●L7.40 IRRIGATION DETAILS ● ● ● ●L7.50 IRRIGATION DETAILS ● ● ● ●S

TRUCTURAL
S2.0 BASEMENT AND FIRST FLOOR PLANS ● ● ● ●

PROJECT INFORMATION

APPLICABLE CODES
1 1
1 1
2 2
No. Date: Description:1 MAY 25.2023 CDP rev12 OCT 27.2023 CDP rev2 7/8/2024
91 UP
DN
DN
DN DN
UP
UP
DN
DN
DN
BATH B
204

LEGEND - AREA CALC
PORTION OF RESIDENCE COVERED WITH ROOF / ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONAREA CALCULATION PER CHAPTER 3 OF THE MALIBU LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

LEGEND - BULK TABULATION
BULK AREA TABULATION (2/3'S RULE): MAIN RESIDENCE AREA ABOVE 18'

PAVERS, SLD

PERMEABLE WOOD DECK
POOL

LEGEND - IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE

PORTION OF RESIDENCE WITH IMPERVIOUS SURFACES
SEAL
PROJECT NO.SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBERDATEISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNERPeaches, LLC47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

DRAWING SERIES

SITEPLANS & RCPSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBUILDING SECTIONSWALL SECTIONSTYPICAL DETAILSINTERIOR ELEVATIONSDETAILSSCHEDULES

REVISIONS

RENEWAL
DATE
10/31/23
C-37488

DANIEL R
YODER

LICENSED ARCHITECT
IA NR

IFO OF CAL ETATS

AREA PLANS
A0.01
CDP REV 4
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWYMALIBU, CA 90265
03 JULY 2024
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
Author
A0.01 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
2 MAIN LEVEL AREA PLAN
A0.01 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
3 UPPER LEVEL AREA PLAN
A0.01 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
1 LOWER LEVEL AREA PLAN
ALLOWABLE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SF(SEE COVER SHEET FOR CALCULATION):LOWER LEVEL:MAIN LEVEL:UPPER LEVEL:SQUARE FOOTAGE TABULATION 3,983 SF145.5 SF2,636 SF1,196 SF
TOTAL PROPOSED SF: 3,977.5 SF (<3,983 SF)
(1,291 SF - 1,000 SF EXEMPT @ 50% = 145.5 SF)
MAIN LEVEL 2,636 SF
LOWER LEVEL145.5 SF1,291 SF - 1,000 SF EXEMPT @ 50% = 145.5 SF UPPER LEVEL 1,196 SF
AREA BELOW 18':MAXIMUM AREA ALLOWED OVER 18' (2,636 SF X .667):BULK AREA TABULATION 2,636 SF1,758 SF
TOTAL PROPOSED SF ABOVE 18': 1,710 SF (<1,758 SF)
AREA OVER 18'
1,710 SF
A0.01 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
4 BULK AREA TABULATION
A0.01 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
5 IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE AREA CONTAINING IMPERMEABLE SURFACES:

Building FootprintHardscapePoolTotal
MAXIMUM AREA ALLOWED CONTAINING IMPERMEABLE SURFACES:IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE 2,636 SF
944 SF280 SF
3,860 SF5,899 SF
TOTAL PROPOSED SF OF IMPERMEABLE SURFACES: 3,860 SF (<5,899SF)

AREA CONTAINING
IMPERMEABLE SURFACES 3,860 SF
1 1
No. Date: Description:1 MAY 25.2023 CDP rev1
92 PROPOSED BUILDING DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT
2 SEAL
PROJECT NO.SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBERDATEISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNERPeaches, LLC47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

DRAWING SERIES

SITEPLANS & RCPSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBUILDING SECTIONSWALL SECTIONSTYPICAL DETAILSINTERIOR ELEVATIONSDETAILSSCHEDULES

REVISIONS

RENEWAL
DATE
10/31/23
C-37488

DANIEL R
YODER

LICENSED
A

RCHITECT
IA NR
IFO
OF
C
AL
ETATS

SLOPE ANALYSIS
A0.02
CDP REV 4
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWYMALIBU, CA 90265
03 JULY 2024
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
Author
No. Date: Description:
93 0
0 0
130'
A.P.N 4473-021-013
A.P.N
4473-021-016

PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY
LI
N
E
33616 PROPERTY CDP APPROVED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. NOT PART OF THIS SUBMISSION FI
RE
ACCESS

CLEARANCE
20 '-0
"

BLUFF TOP (PLANNING

STAFF DETERMINED)
50' BLUFF TOP SETBACK
16'-10"
72'-0"
21'-3"
16'-7"
110'-1"

PACIFIC COAST HWY

MAIN HOUSE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE
P
RO
P
E
RTY
L
I
N
E

1. B
5 FOS LINE PLUS LUFF RETREAT 1.5 FOS STATIC

1.1 FOS SEISMIC (0.2g)
3 OFFSET
25'-0"
110'
100'
110'
100'
95'
95'
120'
110'
115'
1 4 15'
LIP ANALYSIS CALCULATIONSProperty Line Width at Front of Property (PCH) = 39'-4"View Corridor Width = 16'-7"View Corridor % of Total Area = 42%Indicates area of slope taller than 25 FT where Malibu Municipal Code section 17.40.040(6)(e) requires a 25 FT building setback from the toe of the slope.

SEAL
PROJECT NO.SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBERDATEISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNERPeaches, LLC47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

DRAWING SERIES

SITEPLANS & RCPSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBUILDING SECTIONSWALL SECTIONSTYPICAL DETAILSINTERIOR ELEVATIONSDETAILSSCHEDULES

REVISIONS

RENEWAL
DATE
10/31/23
C-37488

DANIEL R
YODER

LICENSED ARCHITECT
IA NR

IFO OF CAL ETATS

LIP ANALYSIS
A0.04
CDP REV 4
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWYMALIBU, CA 90265
03 JULY 2024
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
Author
A0.04 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
1 LIP ANALYSIS
2 No. Date: Description:2 OCT 27.2023 CDP rev23 FEB 06.2024 CDP rev34 JUL 03.2024 CDP rev 4 4 94
0 0
0 A.P.N
4473-021-012
PARCEL 2
A.P.N
4473-021-011
PARCEL 1
120'
130'
110'
120'
128'
126'
124'
A.P.N
4473-021-013
A.P.N
4473-021-018
A.P.N
4473
-02
1 -0
1 6
(E) CATV(E) VERIZON(E) EDISON

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE
(E) MAILBOXESSIGN POSTS
(E) WATER METER
(E) DRAIN INLET
122'

REAR YARD SETBACK

PROPERTY LINE

FRONT YARD SETBACK

SIDE YARD SETBACK

UTILITY EASEMENT SETBACK LINE

PROPERTY LINE
5' UTILITY EASEMENT
122'
118'
116'114'
112'
(E) CABLE (E) VERIZON (E) EDISON
(E) 2" DIA. WATER LINE
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
SLOPE EASEMENT PER BK 38693 PG 162, O.R.UTILITY EASEMENT PER BK 21312 PG 240, O.R. 125' - 0"

TOP OF BLUFF
122'
33616 PROPERTY CDP APPROVED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT.

NOT PART OF THIS SUBMISSION

PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

LINE OF BASEMENT BELOW
(N) WOOD DECK
MIN. 50' BLUFF SETBACK
(N) POOL
(E) FENCE TO BE REMOVED
(E) PRIVATE ROAD GATE
P
R
I
VAT
E
ROAD
2 CAR GARAGE
2 (UNENCLOSED)

PARKING SPACES
S
I
D
E
YA
R
D
S
E
T
BAC
K
MAIN LVL FF +125'-0"BSMT FF +113'-6"
KITCHEN FF +127'-0"CRAWL SPACE FF +118'-6"
GARAGE FF +128'-6"

LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
(N) LINE OF ROOF EAVE(N) TREE, SLD
(N) TREE, SLD
(N) SLIDING GATE
(N) FENCE,SLD
(N) FENCE, SLD
24'-0"
15'-5" 4'-0"

LINE OF CRAWLSPACE BELOW
(N) TREE, SLD
(N) TREES, SLD
48'-5"
12'-0" 17'-0"
72'-0"
T.O. ROOF +150'-3"

EXISTING NATURAL
GRADE +128'-10"
EXISTING NATURAL GRADE +123'-0"
20' WIDE MANUALLY OPERATED

SECURITY GATE TO BE MAINTAINED

OPERATIONAL AT ALL TIMES
(N) PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK

FIRE ACCESS CLEARANCE
20'-0"
(E) SLIDING GATE (E) SLIDING GATE (N) SLIDING GATE
FRONT YARD SETBACK50% DISCRETIONARY REDUCTION
(N) SEPTIC
PIT
(N) SEPTIC
PIT

FIRE ACCESS PATHWAY

FIRE ACCESS PATHWAY
(N) SEPTIC
PIT
150' POINT FROM FIRE

TRUCK APARATUS
(N) SITE RETAINING WALL

LINE OF UPPER

FLOOR LEVEL

CANTILEVER ABOVE
APPROX. LIMITS OF FILL
AREA OF SLOPE EROSIONAPPROX. AREA OF GEOBRUGG MESH, SEE CIVIL3' HIGH SLOUGH WALL, SEE CIVIL

CONCRETE SWALE, SEE CIVIL
10'-0"
18'-0"
10'-0"
18'-0"
[DISCRETIONARY FRONT YARD SETBACK]
20'-3"
2 2
20'-0"
5'-0"
5'-0"
5'-0"
5'-0"
SLOPE
13 .5%
S
L
O
P
E
1 3.5
%
SLOPE 2%
SLOPE 0% (WALKABLE DECK)
SLOPE 6%
SLOPE 2%
SLOPE 4%
STEPS
SLOPE 2% SLOPE 2%
STEPS 2% SLOPE
STEPS 2% SLOPE STEPS 2% SLOPE STEPS 2% SLOPE

1.5 FOS LINE PLUS BLUFF

RETREAT

1.5 FOS STATIC

RESTRICTED USE AREA

1.1 FOS SEISMIC (0.2g)
3 FLOATING STEPS
4 SEAL
PROJECT NO.SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBERDATEISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNERPeaches, LLC47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

DRAWING SERIES

SITEPLANS & RCPSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBUILDING SECTIONSWALL SECTIONSTYPICAL DETAILSINTERIOR ELEVATIONSDETAILSSCHEDULES

REVISIONS

RENEWAL
DATE
10/31/23
C-37488

DANIEL R
YODER

LICENSED ARCHITECT
IA NR

IFO OF CAL ETATS

SITE PLAN
A1.01
CDP REV 4
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWYMALIBU, CA 90265
03 JULY 2024
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
MG
A1.01 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"
1 SITE PLAN
TRUE

NORTH PROJECT
0 4' 8' 16' 32'
1 No. Date: Description:1 MAY 25.2023 CDP rev12 OCT 27.2023 CDP rev23 FEB 06.2024 CDP rev34 JUL 03.2024 CDP rev 4 95 3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0" 3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"
120'
130'
120'
128'
126'
124'
122'
122'
118'
1 29
'
131'
72'-0"
44'-0"
18'-0"
26'-0"
51'-0"
19'-5" 18'-0" 11'-0"
3'-0" 21'-0" 9'-9" 38'-3"

PV ARRAYINTEGRATED GUTTERSTANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
7'-4 3/4"
3'-8 1/2"
151' - 0"
2 4
SEAL
PROJECT NO.SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBERDATEISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNERPeaches, LLC47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

DRAWING SERIES

SITEPLANS & RCPSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBUILDING SECTIONSWALL SECTIONSTYPICAL DETAILSINTERIOR ELEVATIONSDETAILSSCHEDULES

REVISIONS

RENEWAL
DATE
10/31/23
C-37488

DANIEL R
YODER

LICENSED ARCHITECT
IA NR

IFO OF CAL ETATS

ROOF PLAN
A1.04
CDP REV 4
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWYMALIBU, CA 90265
03 JULY 2024
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
Author
A1.04 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 FLOOR PLAN - ROOF LEVEL W/ TOPOGRAPHY
TRUE

NORTH PROJECT
No. Date: Description:2 OCT 27.2023 CDP rev24 JUL 03.2024 CDP rev 4 96 UP UP
DN
DN
DN
1 3 4 6 7 8
AD
E
G
H
F
C
2 4
A4.01
1 A4.01
2 A4.01
6 A4.01
3 A4.01
A3.01
1 A3.01 4
A3.01
2 3 A3.01
5 A4.01
B
5 72'-0"
3'-0" 15'-0" 6'-0" 10'-0" 20'-0" 12'-0" 6'-0"
63'-5"
15'-0" 11'-0" 6'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 15'-5" DECK ABOVE AV ROOM 005 MECHANICAL 003 POWDER 002 THEATER 004 HALL 001 UNOCCUPIED CRAWLSPACE POOL

EQUIPMENT POOL

UNOCCUPIED

CRAWLSPACE
110' - 6"
117' - 1"121' - 1"
113' - 6"

DECK STRUCTURE, SSD

TRELLIS STRUCTURE
50' BLUFF SETBACK LINE
1 2

1.5 FOS LINE PLUS

BLUFF RETREAT

1.5 FOS STATIC1.1 FOS SEISMIC (0.2g)
3 1 3 4 6 7 8
AD
E
G
H
F
C
2 4
A4.01
1 A4.01
2 A4.01
6 A4.01
3 A4.01
A3.01
1 A3.01
2 3 A3.01
5 A4.01
B
5 3'-0" 15'-0" 6'-0" 10'-0" 20'-0" 12'-0" 6'-0"
72'-0"
15'-0" 11'-0" 6'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 15'-5"
63'-5"
POWDER
107
GARAGE
105
POWDER
104

LAUNDRY
106
BATH
108

LIVING/DINING
102
ENTRY
101

KITCHEN
103

OUTDOOR
SHOWER
109

PERMEABLE DECK

SITE RETAINING WALLS, SCD

POCKETING DOORSPASSTHROUGH WINDOW

OUTDOOR BAR

INFINITY EDGE POOL
A3.01 4
128' - 6"
127' - 0"
125' - 0"
127' - 0"
125' - 0"
50' BLUFF SETBACK
2 1.5 FOS LINE PLUS

BLUFF RETREAT

1.5 FOS STATIC1.1 FOS SEISMIC (0.2g)
3 4
SEAL
PROJECT NO.SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBERDATEISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNERPeaches, LLC47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

DRAWING SERIES

SITEPLANS & RCPSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBUILDING SECTIONSWALL SECTIONSTYPICAL DETAILSINTERIOR ELEVATIONSDETAILSSCHEDULES

REVISIONS

RENEWAL
DATE
10/31/23
C-37488

DANIEL R
YODER

LICENSED ARCHITECT
IA NR

IFO OF CAL ETATS

FLOOR PLANS
A2.01
CDP REV 4
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWYMALIBU, CA 90265
03 JULY 2024
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
Author
A2.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 FLOOR PLAN - LOWER LEVEL
A2.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 FLOOR PLAN - MAIN LEVEL
TRUE

NORTH PROJECT
0 4' 8' 16' 32'
No. Date: Description:1 MAY 25.2023 CDP rev12 OCT 27.2023 CDP rev23 FEB 06.2024 CDP rev34 JUL 03.2024 CDP rev 4 97 DN
1 3 4 6 7 8
AD
E
G
H
F
C
2 4
A4.01
1 A4.01
2 A4.01
6 A4.01
3 A4.01
A3.01
1 A3.01 4
A3.01
2 3 A3.01
5 A4.01
B
5 72'-0"
3'-0" 15'-0" 6'-0" 10'-0" 20'-0" 12'-0" 6'-0"
63'-5"
15'-0" 11'-0" 6'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 15'-5" BEDROOM B 205 BATH B 204 BEDROOM B PATIO YOGA DECKHALL 201 BATH A 202 BEDROOM A 203 GREEN ROOF METAL TRELLIS METAL TRELLIS STEEL GUARDRAIL

STEEL GUARDRAIL

INTEGRATED GUTTER

DRAIN BELOW
138' - 6"
138' - 6"
138' - 6"
138' - 6"
2 4
1 3 4 6 7 8
AD
E
G
H
F
C
2 4
A4.01
1 A4.01
2 A4.01
6 A4.01
3 A4.01
A3.01
1 A3.01 4
A3.01
2 3 A3.01
5 A4.01
B
5 72'-0"
3'-0" 15'-0" 6'-0" 10'-0" 20'-0" 12'-0" 6'-0"
63'-5"
15'-0" 11'-0" 6'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 15'-5" PV ARRAY INTEGRATED GUTTER 3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0" 3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"

STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
7'-4 3/4"
3'-8 1/2"
151' - 0"
2 4
SEAL
PROJECT NO.SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBERDATEISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNERPeaches, LLC47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

DRAWING SERIES

SITEPLANS & RCPSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBUILDING SECTIONSWALL SECTIONSTYPICAL DETAILSINTERIOR ELEVATIONSDETAILSSCHEDULES

REVISIONS

RENEWAL
DATE
10/31/23
C-37488

DANIEL R
YODER

LICENSED ARCHITECT
IA NR

IFO OF CAL ETATS

FLOOR PLANS
A2.02
CDP REV 4
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWYMALIBU, CA 90265
03 JULY 2024
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
Author
A2.02 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 FLOOR PLAN - UPPER LEVEL
A2.02 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 FLOOR PLAN - ROOF LEVEL
TRUE

NORTH PROJECT
0 4' 8' 16' 32'
No. Date: Description:2 OCT 27.2023 CDP rev24 JUL 03.2024 CDP rev 4 98 MAIN LEVEL FF
125' - 0"

UPPER LEVEL FF / TO PARAPET
138' - 6"

ENTRY/KITCHEN FF
127' - 0"

BO UPPER LEVEL CEILING
148' - 0"

GARAGE FF
128' - 6"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
151' - 0"

H G F E D C B A
18' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE

EXISTING NATURAL GRADE
123' - 0"
28' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE

METAL TRELLIS

STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF

STUCCO FINISH

SITE WALL

VERTICAL METAL SCREEN
2 MAIN LEVEL FF
125' - 0"

UPPER LEVEL FF / TO PARAPET
138' - 6"

ENTRY/KITCHEN FF
127' - 0"

BO UPPER LEVEL CEILING
148' - 0"

GARAGE FF
128' - 6"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
151' - 0"
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

EXISTING NATURAL GRADE
123' - 0"

STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFSTUCCO FINISH

VERTICAL METAL SCREEN

METAL TRELLISSTUCCO FINISH

WOOD CLAD GARAGE DOOR

VERTICAL METAL SCREENGREEN ROOF
18' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE
28' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE

MAIN LEVEL FF
125' - 0"

UPPER LEVEL FF / TO PARAPET
138' - 6"

ENTRY/KITCHEN FF
127' - 0"

BO UPPER LEVEL CEILING
148' - 0"

GARAGE FF
128' - 6"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
151' - 0"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

EXISTING NATURAL GRADE
123' - 0"

PV ARRAY

STEEL GUARDRAIL

STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF

VERTICAL METAL SCREEN

STUCCO FINISH

METAL TRELLIS

WOOD FINISH

STUCCO FINISH

OUTDOOR BARSITE WALLINFINITY POOL
18' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE28' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE
1 2
4 MAIN LEVEL FF
125' - 0"

UPPER LEVEL FF / TO PARAPET
138' - 6"

ENTRY/KITCHEN FF
127' - 0"

BO UPPER LEVEL CEILING
148' - 0"

GARAGE FF
128' - 6"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
151' - 0"

A B C D E F G H

EXISTING NATURAL GRADE
123' - 0"

STEEL GUARDRAIL

STUCCO FINISHSTANDING SEAM METAL ROOF

METAL TRELLIS

VERTICAL METAL SCREEN

SITE WALL (STUCCO FINISH)

GREEN ROOF

METAL TRELLIS
18' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE28' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE
2 SEAL
PROJECT NO.SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBERDATEISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNERPeaches, LLC47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

DRAWING SERIES

SITEPLANS & RCPSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBUILDING SECTIONSWALL SECTIONSTYPICAL DETAILSINTERIOR ELEVATIONSDETAILSSCHEDULES

REVISIONS

RENEWAL
DATE
10/31/23
C-37488

DANIEL R
YODER

LICENSED ARCHITECT
IA NR

IFO OF CAL ETATS

EXTERIOR

ELEVATIONS
A3.01
CDP REV 4
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWYMALIBU, CA 90265
03 JULY 2024
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
Author
A3.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
3 EAST ELEVATION
A3.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 NORTH ELEVATION
A3.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 SOUTH ELEVATION
A3.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
4 WEST ELEVATION
0 4' 8' 16' 32'
No. Date: Description:1 MAY 25.2023 CDP rev12 OCT 27.2023 CDP rev24 JUL 03.2024 CDP rev 4 99 MAIN LEVEL FF
125' - 0"UPPER LEVEL FF / TO PARAPET138' - 6"ENTRY/KITCHEN FF127' - 0"BO UPPER LEVEL CEILING148' - 0"GARAGE FF128' - 6"LOWER LEVEL FF110' - 6"MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT151' - 0" 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

KITCHEN
103 LIVING/DINING
102
POWDER
107

OUTDOOR
SHOWER
109

YOGA DECK BEDROOM B PATIO
CRAWLSPACE BB117' - 1" THEATER
004

MECHANICAL
003

UNOCCUPIED

CRAWLSPACE EXISTING NATURAL GRADE
123' - 0"
5'-11 3/4"

MAIN LEVEL FF
125' - 0"

UPPER LEVEL FF / TO PARAPET
138' - 6"

ENTRY/KITCHEN FF
127' - 0"

BO UPPER LEVEL CEILING
148' - 0"

GARAGE FF
128' - 6"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
151' - 0"

A B C D E F G H
GARAGE
105
POWDER
104 KITCHEN
103
BATH B
204
DECK

CRAWLSPACE BB
117' - 1"

UNOCCUPIED

CRAWLSPACE

EXISTING NATURAL GRADE
123' - 0"

CRAWLSPACE AA
121' - 1"

UNOCCUPIED

CRAWLSPACE
5'-11"
5'-11"
1 2

MAIN LEVEL FF
125' - 0"

UPPER LEVEL FF / TO PARAPET
138' - 6"

ENTRY/KITCHEN FF
127' - 0"

BO UPPER LEVEL CEILING
148' - 0"

GARAGE FF
128' - 6"

LOWER LEVEL FF
110' - 6"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
151' - 0"

A B C D E F G H

LIVING/DINING
102
ENTRY
101

BEDROOM B
205

BEDROOM B
PATIO

CRAWLSPACE BB
117' - 1"

MECHANICAL
003
HALL
001
POWDER
002

EXISTING NATURAL GRADE
123' - 0"

CRAWLSPACE AA
121' - 1"
12 UPPER LEVEL FF / TO PARAPET138' - 6"ENTRY/KITCHEN FF127' - 0"BO UPPER LEVEL CEILING148' - 0"GARAGE FF128' - 6"MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT151' - 0" 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
GARAGE
105
EXISTING NATURAL GRADE123' - 0"CRAWLSPACE AA121' - 1"

UNOCCUPIED

CRAWLSPACE MAIN LEVEL FF
125' - 0"

UPPER LEVEL FF / TO PARAPET
138' - 6"

ENTRY/KITCHEN FF
127' - 0"

BO UPPER LEVEL CEILING
148' - 0"

GARAGE FF
128' - 6"

LOWER LEVEL FF
110' - 6"

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
151' - 0"

A B C D E F G H

LIVING/DINING
102
POWDER
107
BATH
108
HALL
201
BATH A
202

BEDROOM A
203

DECK AT POOL LOUNGE AREA

THEATER
004

AV ROOM
005

EXISTING NATURAL GRADE
123' - 0"
1 2
UPPER LEVEL FF / TO PARAPET138' - 6"ENTRY/KITCHEN FF127' - 0"BO UPPER LEVEL CEILING148' - 0"GARAGE FF128' - 6"LOWER LEVEL FF110' - 6"MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT151' - 0" 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
ENTRY
101
HALL
201

BEDROOM B
205
BATH B
204
POWDER
104

LAUNDRY
106

KITCHEN
103

LIVING/DINING
102
HALL
001

AV ROOM
005
EXISTING NATURAL GRADE123' - 0"CRAWLSPACE AA121' - 1"

UNOCCUPIED

CRAWLSPACE
SEAL
PROJECT NO.SHEET NAMESHEET NUMBERDATEISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNERPeaches, LLC47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

DRAWING SERIES

SITEPLANS & RCPSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBUILDING SECTIONSWALL SECTIONSTYPICAL DETAILSINTERIOR ELEVATIONSDETAILSSCHEDULES

REVISIONS

RENEWAL
DATE
10/31/23
C-37488

DANIEL R
YODER

LICENSED ARCHITECT
IA NR

IFO OF CAL ETATS

BUILDING

SECTIONS
A4.01
CDP REV 4
33610 PACIFIC COAST HWYMALIBU, CA 90265
03 JULY 2024
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
Author
A4.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
4 Building Section
A4.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 Building Section
A4.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 Building Section
A4.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
6 Building Section
A4.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
3 Building Section
A4.01 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
5 Building Section
No. Date: Description:1 MAY 25.2023 CDP rev12 OCT 27.2023 CDP rev2 100
SEAL
PROJECT NO.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
DATE

ISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNER
Peaches, LLC
47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

ARCHITECT
STUDY Architects
81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103

LANDSCAPE
Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc.
1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401
CIVIL
LC Engineering
889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360

STRUCTURAL
Holmes Structures
523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122
Los Angeles, CA 90014
SEPTIC
EPD Consultants
20722 Main St.

Carson, CA 90745

GEOTECH
Geosoils
6634 Valjean Ave.

Van Nuys, CA 91406

MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING
Company Name
No. Street, City, ST ZIP

LIGHTING
Company Name
No. Street, City, ST ZIP
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
A8
A9

DRAWING SERIES
SITE

PLANS & RCPS

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

BUILDING SECTIONS

WALL SECTIONS

TYPICAL DETAILS

INTERIOR ELEVATIONS

DETAILS

SCHEDULES

REVISIONS
CDP REV 3
33610 Pacific Coast Hwy
Malibu, CA 90265
27 OCT2023
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
JK/MT
No. Date: Description:
04/11/2023

SIGNATURE

REN DATE

L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC
MA
T
RK D . TESSIER - 5043

F C O ETATS

AL I FORN
DATE
I A
03/31/2025
1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1
2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2
3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3
4 06/28/24

LANDSCAPE

TITLE SHEET
L0.00

MALIBU, CALIFORNIA
33610 PCH - LANDSCAPE

SHEET SCHEDULE
L-0.0 TITLE SHEET
L-2.0 HARDSCAPE AND FENCING PLAN
L-2.1 HARDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN
L-2.2 LIGHTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN
L-2.3 VIEW CORRIDOR DIAGRAM
L-5.0 FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN
L-5.1 PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN
L-7.1 IRRIGATION PLAN
L-7.2 IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES
L-7.3 IRRIGATION DETAILS
L-7.4 IRRIGATION DETAILS
L-7.5 IRRIGATION DETAILS

VICINITY MAP
2 5 10/08/24 SURVEY OMITTED
7/8/2024
101
128' - 6" 127' - 0" 125' - 0" 127' - 0" 125' - 0" 2 3 5' MIN. POOL ENCLOSURE FENCE AND GATES 42" HT. DECORATIVE FENCE AND VEHICULAR GATE PA PA PA PAPA PA PA 5' MIN. POOL ENCLOSURE FENCE AND GATES 4' 4' HARDSCAPE AND FENCING PLAN L2.00 SEAL PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER DATE ISSUANCE PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DRAWN BY OWNER Peaches, LLC 47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610 ARCHITECT STUDY Architects 81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103 LANDSCAPE Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVIL LC Engineering 889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 STRUCTURAL Holmes Structures 523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122 Los Angeles, CA 90014 SEPTIC EPD Consultants 20722 Main St. Carson, CA 90745 GEOTECH Geosoils 6634 Valjean Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91406 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP LIGHTING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 DRAWING SERIES SITE PLANS & RCPS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETAILS SCHEDULES REVISIONS CDP REV 3 33610 Pacific Coast Hwy Malibu, CA 90265 27 OCT2023 2102 W. MALIBU MAIN RESIDENCEJK/MT No. Date: Description: 04/11/2023 SIGNATURE REN DATE L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC MA T RK D . TESSIER - 5043 F C O ETATS AL I FORN DATE I A 03/31/2025 1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1 2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2 3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3 4 06/28/24 N GENERAL POOL ENCLOSURE NOTES 1. ALL POOL ENCLOSURE GATES SHALL OPEN AWAY FROM THE SPA AREA AND SHALL BE SELF-CLOSING W/A SELF-LATCHING DEVICE, PLACED NO LOWER THAN 60 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND. POOL ENCLOSURE FENCE TO BE 5'-0" HT. MINIMUM, NON CLIMBABLE PER CODE. 2. ALL DOORS EXITING FROM THE RESIDENCE DIRECTLY TO THE SPA AREA ARE TO HAVE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED "EXIT ALARMS" PER LABC SECTION 91.3150B 3. CONTRACTOR TO ADHERE TO "GUIDELINES FOR ENTRAPMENT HAZARDS: MAKING POOLS AND SPAS SAFER" BY U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, DATED MARCH, 2005 AND IS TO SATISFY "APPLICABLE STANDARDS" LOCATED IN APPENDIX A IN SAID GUIDELINES 4. PROVIDE AN ALARM FOR DOORS TO THE DWELLING THAT FORM A PART OF THE POOL ENCLOSURE. THE ALARM SHALL ACTIVATE WITHIN 7 SECONDS AND SOUND CONTINUOUSLY FOR A MIN. OF 30 SECONDS WHEN THE DOOR IS OPENED IT SHALL AUTOMATICALLY RESET AND BE EQUIPPED WITH A MANUAL MEANS TO DEACTIVATE (FOR 15 SECS. MAX.) FOR A SINGLE OPENING. THE DEACTIVATION SWITCH SHALL BE AT LEAST 54" ABOVE THE FLOOR. (3109.4.1.8) 5. THE TOP OF BARRIER SHALL BE AT LEAST 60 INCHES ABOVE GRADE MEASURED ON THE SIDE OF THE BARRIER THAT FACES AWAY FROM THE SWIMMING POOL. THE MAX VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN GRADE AND THE BOTTOM OF THE BARRIER SHALL BE 2 INCHES MEASURED ON THE SIDE OF THE BARRIER THAT FACES AWAY FROM THE SWIMMING POOL. THE GATE SHALL OPEN OUTWARD AWAY FROM THE POOL AND SHALL BE SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LATCHING. THE LATCH TO BE MINIMUM 4.5 FT MIN ABOVE THE GROUND. 1 SEE L-2.30 FOR NOTES ON VIEW CORRIDORS 4 102
2 3 3'-6" TYP. DECK, REFER TO ARCH. PLANS INDIAN BLUESTONE COBBLE PA PA PA PA ENTRY VEHICULAR GATE PA PA PA PA PA GARDEN WALL WATER FEATURE WATER FEATURE CIP CONC STEPS DN DN DN DN DN CIP CONC CIP CONC CIP CONC STEPS DN POOL, REFER TO ARCH. PLANS SLIDING GATE 42" HIGH FENCE MAX. SOD (1441 SQFT) GRAVEL PATH GRAVEL CIP CONC CIP CONC 50' BLUFF SETBACK 5' MIN. POOL ENCLOSURE FENCE 5' MIN. POOL ENCLOSURE FENCE AND GATES 42" HIGH FENCE MAX. PA RETAINING WALL DN 5' MIN. POOL ENCLOSURE FENCE AND GATES CIP CONC CIP CONC RETAINING WALL CIP CONC STEPS GRAVEL PATH PA DECORATIVE BOULDERS 13'-6" 6' 5' TYP. 5' MIN. POOL ENCLOSURE FENCE NEW TREE, TYP. PA PA MATERIAL SCHEDULE SITE ELEMENT MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS SOURCES P1 PAVING TYPE 1 INDIAN BLUESTONE COBBLE, PERMEABLE SET ON SAND P2 PAVING TYPE 2 NATURAL GREY CIP CONCRETE P3 PAVING TYPE 3 3/8" GRANITE GRAVEL HARDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT L2.10 SEAL PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER DATE ISSUANCE PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DRAWN BY OWNER Peaches, LLC 47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610 ARCHITECT STUDY Architects 81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103 LANDSCAPE Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVIL LC Engineering 889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 STRUCTURAL Holmes Structures 523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122 Los Angeles, CA 90014 SEPTIC EPD Consultants 20722 Main St. Carson, CA 90745 GEOTECH Geosoils 6634 Valjean Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91406 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP LIGHTING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 DRAWING SERIES SITE PLANS & RCPS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETAILS SCHEDULES REVISIONS CDP REV 3 33610 Pacific Coast Hwy Malibu, CA 90265 27 OCT2023 2102 W. MALIBU MAIN RESIDENCEJK/MT No. Date: Description: 04/11/2023 SIGNATURE REN DATE L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC MA T RK D . TESSIER - 5043 F C O ETATS AL I FORN DATE I A 03/31/2025 1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1 2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2 3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3 4 06/28/24 NGENERAL HARDSCAPE NOTES: 1. THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT RESTRICT A FIVE-FOOT CLEAR AND UNOBSTRUCTED ACCESS TO ANY WATER OR POWER DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES (POWER POLES, PULL-BOXES, TRANSFORMERS, VAULTS, PUMPS, VALVES, METERS, APPURTENANCES, ETC.) OR TO THE LOCATION OF THE HOOK-UP. THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT BE WITHIN TEN FEET OF ANY POWER LINES-WHETHER OR NOT THE LINES ARE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY CAUSE CONSTRUCTION DELAYS AND/OR ADDITIONAL EXPENSES. 1 2 2 4 103
2 3 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL RPRPRP RPRPRP 16'-7" VIEW CORRIDOR, PER ARCHITECT, A0.04 PROPOSED WALL HEIGHT IS 42", BELOW THE BLUE WATER HORIZON LINE AS SHOWN BY ARCHITECT IN ATTACHED EXHIBITS, WILL NOT OBSTRUCT HORIZON LINE VIEW CORRIDOR DIAGRAM L2.30 SEAL PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER DATE ISSUANCE PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DRAWN BY OWNER Peaches, LLC 47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610 ARCHITECT STUDY Architects 81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103 LANDSCAPE Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVIL LC Engineering 889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 STRUCTURAL Holmes Structures 523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122 Los Angeles, CA 90014 SEPTIC EPD Consultants 20722 Main St. Carson, CA 90745 GEOTECH Geosoils 6634 Valjean Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91406 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP LIGHTING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 DRAWING SERIES SITE PLANS & RCPS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETAILS SCHEDULES REVISIONS CDP REV 3 33610 Pacific Coast Hwy Malibu, CA 90265 27 OCT2023 2102 W. MALIBU MAIN RESIDENCEJK/MT No. Date: Description: 04/11/2023 SIGNATURE REN DATE L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC MA T RK D . TESSIER - 5043 F C O ETATS AL I FORN DATE I A 03/31/2025 1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1 2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2 3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3 4 06/28/24 N 1 2 NOTES: ALL UNDERSTORY PLANTING AT FULL MATURITY WILL BE SHORTER THAN THE BLUE WATER HORIZON LINE AS SHOWN BY THE ARCHITECT, AND BELOW THE HEIGHT OF ANY FENCES AT THE EDGE OF THE PROPERTY 4 104
2 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 LW1 - WALL DOWNLIGHT LW1 - WALL DOWNLIGHT LP1 - PATH DOWNLIGHT LP1 - PATH DOWNLIGHT LP1 - PATH DOWNLIGHT LS1 - STEPLIGHT LS1 - STEPLIGHT 1 1 DN DN DN DN DN DN 33 LP1 - PATH DOWNLIGHT LW1 - WALL DOWNLIGHT LS1 - STEPLIGHT LIGHTING SCHEDULE SYM TYPE CATEGORY QTY NOTES LW1 WALL LIGHT 7 FULLY SHIELDED FIXTURE, MAX 3000K LS1 STRIP LIGHT 23 BELOW-TREAD LIGHT, MAX 3000K LP1 SPOTLIGHT 16 FULLY SHIELDED FIXTURE, MAX 3000K LT1 TREE-MOUNTED LIGHT 2 FULLY SHIELDED FIXTURE, MAX 3000K LIGHTING ENLARGEMENT L2.20 SEAL PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER DATE ISSUANCE PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DRAWN BY OWNER Peaches, LLC 47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610 ARCHITECT STUDY Architects 81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103 LANDSCAPE Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVIL LC Engineering 889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 STRUCTURAL Holmes Structures 523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122 Los Angeles, CA 90014 SEPTIC EPD Consultants 20722 Main St. Carson, CA 90745 GEOTECH Geosoils 6634 Valjean Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91406 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP LIGHTING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 DRAWING SERIES SITE PLANS & RCPS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETAILS SCHEDULES REVISIONS CDP REV 3 33610 Pacific Coast Hwy Malibu, CA 90265 27 OCT2023 2102 W. MALIBU MAIN RESIDENCEJK/MT No. Date: Description: 04/11/2023 SIGNATURE REN DATE L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC MA T RK D . TESSIER - 5043 F C O ETATS AL I FORN DATE I A 03/31/2025 1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1 2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2 3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3 4 06/28/24 GENERAL LIGHTING NOTES: 1. LIGHTING SHALL BE FULLY SHIELDED AND DIRECTED DOWNWARD. 2. LUMEN COUNT SHALL NOT EXCEED 850 LUMENS. 3. SECURITY LIGHTING SHALL BE ATTACHED TO BUILDINGS AND CONTROLLED BY MOTION SENSORS WHICH EXTINGUISH NO LATER THAN 10 MINUTES AFTER ACTIVATION. 4. COLOR TEMPERATURE SHALL NOT EXCEED 3000 KELVIN. 5. CURFEW: UNLESS CONTROLLED BY MOTION SENSORS, OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE EXTINGUISHED BY 11:00 PM OR WHEN PEOPLE ARE NO LONGER PRESENT IN EXTERIOR AREAS. 6. OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL ONLY BE USED WITHIN 50 FEET OF A RESIDENTIALLY HABITABLE BUILDING OR POOL WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SECURITY, DRIVEWAY AND WALKWAY LIGHTING. N 1 1 ALL PROPOSED LIGHTING WILL CONFORM TO THE CITY'S DARK SKY ORDINANCE 2 4 105
2 3 ZONE 1 30' ZONE 2 70' 5' FIRE DEPARTMENT WALK AROUND LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL RPRPRP RPRPRP PLANTING PLAN WITH FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES L5.00 SEAL PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER DATE ISSUANCE PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DRAWN BY OWNER Peaches, LLC 47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610 ARCHITECT STUDY Architects 81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103 LANDSCAPE Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVIL LC Engineering 889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 STRUCTURAL Holmes Structures 523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122 Los Angeles, CA 90014 SEPTIC EPD Consultants 20722 Main St. Carson, CA 90745 GEOTECH Geosoils 6634 Valjean Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91406 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP LIGHTING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 DRAWING SERIES SITE PLANS & RCPS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETAILS SCHEDULES REVISIONS CDP REV 3 33610 Pacific Coast Hwy Malibu, CA 90265 27 OCT2023 2102 W. MALIBU MAIN RESIDENCEJK/MT No. Date: Description: 04/11/2023 SIGNATURE REN DATE L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC MA T RK D . TESSIER - 5043 F C O ETATS AL I FORN DATE I A 03/31/2025 1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1 2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2 3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3 4 06/28/24 FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN NOTES VEGETATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS APPROVED. THE FOLLOWING NOTES SHALL BE ADHERED TO MAINTENANCE ZONE 1: FROM EDGE OF THE STRUCTURE TO A DISTANCE OF 30 FEET. - PROVIDE FOR 5FT FIRE DEPARTMENT WALK AROUND WITH HERBACEOUS PLANTS - RECOMMENDED TO PLACE WALKWAYS, PATIOS, SPORTS COURTS ETC. ABUTTING STRUCTURE - AVOID PLANTING WOODY PLANTS WITHIN 10 FEET OF STRUCTURE. - USE HERBACEOUS PLANTS, SUCCULENTS, LOW GROWING GRASSES AND GRASS LIKE PLANTS - USE INORGANIC MULCHES SUCH AS GRAVEL WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE STRUCTURE. DO NOT USE RECYCLED RUBBER - SMALL TREE SPECIES (15’-25’ IN HEIGHT) MAY BE PLANTED 10’ FROM STRUCTURE IF USED SPARINGLY - NO CLIMBING VINES ON STRUCTURES - REMOVE DEAD AND DOWN PLANT MATERIAL, WOOD PILES, PATIO FURNITURE, ETC. MAINTENANCE ZONE 2 : 30-100FT FROM BUILDING. - ARRANGE PLANTS AND LIMIT DENSITIES SO NOT TO CREATE LADDER FUELS OR DENSE THICKETS OF VEGETATION - DENSITIES CAN BE INCREASED SLIGHTLY IN THIS ZONE NOTE: ALL FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES ARE TERMINATED AT THE SUBJECT PARCEL/TRACT BOUNDARY. MAINTENANCE: YEAR ROUND - CLEAR ALL LEAVES, LITTER AND DEBRIS FROM FROM RAIN GUTTERS AND ROOF - REGULARLY REMOVE ALL DEAD VEGETATION, FLAMMABLE DEBRIS, FLAMMABLE PATIO FURNITURE FROM LANDSCAPE - STORE WOOD PILES, COMPOST BINS, MULCH BINS ETC. 30’ FROM STRUCTURES - CUT AND REMOVE ANNUAL GRASSES DOWN TO 4 INCHES - IRRIGATION OF ANY FORM SHALL BE APPLIED TO MAINTAIN HIGH FUEL MOISTURE. IRRIGATION TO NATIVE PLANTS IS BENEFICIAL IN SMALL AMOUNTS 1-2 TIMES PER MONTH DURING SUMMER MONTHS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN. PREPARER NAME: MARK TESSIER PROFESSIONAL LICENSE: LICENSE #5043 N EXISTING SLOPE WITH NATIVE PLANTS: LEMONADE BERRY (RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA), DWARF COYOTE BUSH (BACCHARIS PILULARIS) GROUNDCOVER SAGES, MOUNTAIN SAGE, CATALINA CHERRY (PRUNUS ILICIFOLIA), TOYON (HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA), RED BERRY (RHAMNUS CROCEA), MANZANITAS. SEE L-5.10 FOR PLANT SCHEDULE 1 4 106
2 3 ZONE 1 30' DN DN DN DN DN DN DN LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL RPRPRP RPRPRP 50' FROM RESIDENCE 50' FROM RESIDENCE BLUFF RESTORATION MIX BLUFF RESTORATION MIX ARB MAR 50' BLUFF SETBACK 5' FIRE DEPARTMENT WALK AROUND LAU NOB AGA ATT ROS PRO ACH MIL ACH MIL LOM LON AGA ATT HET ARB MUH RIG RHA CAL ACH MIL RHA CAL MUH RIG ACH MIL MUH RIG LEP FRA LAU NOB HET ARB LEP FRA PLANT SCHEDULE SYM KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY WATER USE PLANT FACTOR (PF) SPACING TREES ARB MAR ARBUTUS MARINA ARBUTUS 'MARINA' 36" BOX 1 L 0.3 LAU NOB LAURUS NOBILIS (STANDARD) BAY LAUREL 36" BOX 13 L 0.3 QUE AGR QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 36" BOX 2 L 0.3 SHRUBS ACH MIL ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM (WHITE) YARROW 1 GAL 1304 L 0.3 20" O.C. AGA ATT AGAVE ATTENUTA AGAVE 15 GAL 40 L 0.3 30" O.C. HET ARB HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA TOYON 24" BOX 27 L 0.3 LEP FRA LEPECHINIA FRAGRANS WHITE PITCHER SAGE 5 GAL 32 L 0.3 36" O.C. LOM LON LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE' DWARF MATT RUSH 5 GAL 39 L 0.3 30" O.C. MUH RIG MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS DEER GRASS 1 GAL 79 L 0.3 36" O.C. RHA CAL RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 1 GAL 53 L 0.3 48" O.C. SAL ROS SALVIA ROSMARINUS PROSTRATUS CREEPING ROSEMARY 1 GAL 6 L 0.3 30" O.C. LL RP PLANTING ENLARGEMENT L5.10 SEAL PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER DATE ISSUANCE PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DRAWN BY OWNER Peaches, LLC 47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610 ARCHITECT STUDY Architects 81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103 LANDSCAPE Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVIL LC Engineering 889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 STRUCTURAL Holmes Structures 523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122 Los Angeles, CA 90014 SEPTIC EPD Consultants 20722 Main St. Carson, CA 90745 GEOTECH Geosoils 6634 Valjean Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91406 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP LIGHTING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 DRAWING SERIES SITE PLANS & RCPS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETAILS SCHEDULES REVISIONS CDP REV 3 33610 Pacific Coast Hwy Malibu, CA 90265 27 OCT2023 2102 W. MALIBU MAIN RESIDENCEJK/MT No. Date: Description: 04/11/2023 SIGNATURE REN DATE L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC MA T RK D . TESSIER - 5043 F C O ETATS AL I FORN DATE I A 03/31/2025 1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1 2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2 3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3 4 06/28/24 N 1 1 BLUFF RESTORATION SEED MIX TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SPECIES, SOURCED FROM S&S SEEDS, CARPINTERIA, CA. ARTEMISIA CALIFORNICA, ENCELIA CALIFORNICA, ERIOGONUM FASCICULATUM, RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA, RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA, AND PENNISETUM SETACEUM 3 3 4 107
UP
DN
DN
DN
16'-7"
M
CRE
BV
F

IRRIGATION PLAN
L7.10
SEAL
PROJECT NO.

SHEET NAME

SHEET NUMBER
DATE

ISSUANCE

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

DRAWN BY
OWNER
Peaches, LLC
47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610

ARCHITECT
STUDY Architects
81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103

LANDSCAPE
Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc.
1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401
CIVIL
LC Engineering
889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360

STRUCTURAL
Holmes Structures
523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122
Los Angeles, CA 90014
SEPTIC
EPD Consultants
20722 Main St.

Carson, CA 90745

GEOTECH
Geosoils
6634 Valjean Ave.

Van Nuys, CA 91406

MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING
Company Name
No. Street, City, ST ZIP

LIGHTING
Company Name
No. Street, City, ST ZIP
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
A8
A9

DRAWING SERIES
SITE

PLANS & RCPS

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

BUILDING SECTIONS

WALL SECTIONS

TYPICAL DETAILS

INTERIOR ELEVATIONS

DETAILS

SCHEDULES

REVISIONS
CDP REV 3
33610 Pacific Coast Hwy
Malibu, CA 90265
27 OCT2023
2102
W. MALIBU

MAIN RESIDENCE
JK/MT
No. Date: Description:
04/11/2023

SIGNATURE

REN DATE

L I CENSED
LAND
S
CAPE

ARCH I TEC
MA
T
RK
D
.

T
E
S
S
I
ER
-
5043
F
C
O
ETATS
AL
I
FORN
DATE
I A
03/31/2025
1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1
2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2
3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3
N
NOTE A:

POINT OF CONNECTION (POC) #1 SHALL BE A 2" IRRIGATION MAINLINE TEE OFF THE DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY LINE, DOWNSTREAM OF THE EXISTING 1 1/2" DOMESTIC WATER METER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE ACTUAL LOCATION, WATER TYPE, METER SIZE AND WATER PRESSURE IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.

MEASUREMENT OF THE STATIC (NO WATER MOVING) WATER PRESSURE IS ACCEPTABLE

FOR POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS WHERE NO PUMP HAS BEEN INDICATED ON THESE PLANS. WHEN USING RECYCLED WATER, OR ON POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS REQUIRING

A PUMP, ONLY THE MEASUREMENT OF DYNAMIC (WATER MOVING THROUGH THE METER) WATER PRESSURE, SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE. THE DYNAMIC WATER PRESSURE SHALL BE MEASURED AT THE MAXIMUM SYSTEM DEMAND AS INDICATED BELOW. IF ANY

OF THE POC INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWING IS FOUND TO BE DIFFERENT

THAN THE ACTUAL POC INFORMATION GATHERED IN THE FIELD, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND IRRIGATION CONSULTANT. SHOULD THE

CONTRACTOR FAIL TO VERIFY THE POC INFORMATION AS SHOWN HEREIN, ANY

CHANGES REQUIRED BY LOW PRESSURE OR VOLUME SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.

WATER PRESSURE AT POC: N/A PSI (STATIC / DYNAMIC)
DESIGN WATER PRESSURE: N/A PSI
MAXIMUM SYSTEM DEMAND: N/A GPM
PRESSURE BOOST REQUIRED: N/A PSI
RESIDUAL WATER PRESSURE: N/A PSI
NOTE B:

CONTROLLER "A" SHALL BE OF THE BRAND, MODEL AND STATION SIZE AS INDICATED ON THE IRRIGATION MATERIALS LEGEND. THE CONTROLLER SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE

REQUIRED ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLY AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. FINAL LOCATION OF CONTROLLER AND ELECTRICAL

POINT OF CONNECTION SHALL BE CONFIRMED WITH OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.

NOTE C:

THESE PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC, THE MAINLINE AND RELATED IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IS SHOWN WITHIN THE PAVING FOR CLARITY ONLY. THE ACTUAL LOCATION

OF MAINLINE AND RELATED IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WITHIN PLANTER AND A MINIMUM OF 18" OFF ADJACENT HARDSCAPE AND OTHER OBSTACLES, TYPICAL.

NOTE D:

CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL HEADS AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE ANY

VERTICAL OBSTRUCTIONS THAT MAY OCCUR IN THE LANDSCAPE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LIGHT POLES, FIRE HYDRANTS, TREES, ETC. WHEN A SLIGHT RELOCATION

OF THE HEAD IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO CLEAR THE OBSTACLE, OR IF IT NEGATIVELY

AFFECTS THE COVERAGE, AN ADDITIONAL HEAD SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PLACE ONE HEAD ON EITHER SIDE OF THE OBSTACLE. THE NOZZLES OF THESE TWO HEADS SHALL

HAVE ARC PATTERNS THAT ADD UP TO THE ORIGINAL ARC PATTERN OF THE HEAD INDICATED ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL HEAD LAYOUT WITH OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.

NOTE E:

THESE PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC, TREE BUBBLERS AND LATERAL LINES ARE SHOWN

WITHIN THE PAVING FOR CLARITY ONLY, THE ACTUAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PLANTER. THE TREE BUBBLERS SHALL BE ALIGNED WITH TREES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANTING PLANS, AND AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ALL LAYOUT IN FIELD WITH OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.

NOTE F:

PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE OWNER

AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT A SCALED SHOP DRAWING INDICATING THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS FOR THE IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT LISTED BELOW. THE SHOP DRAWING

SHALL BE PREPARED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SHOP DRAWINGS MUST INCLUDE THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:

1. POINT OF CONNECTION (INCLUDING WATER POC, BACK FLOW DEVICES, MASTER CONTROL VALVES, FLOW SENSORS, ETC.)

2. ISOLATION VALVES

3. AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVES (INDICATE STATION NUMBER)

4. QUICK COUPLING VALVES

5. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER(S)

6. RELATED EQUIPMENT (AS MAY BE DIRECTED).

EACH PIECE OF AFOREMENTIONED EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE IT'S PROPOSED INSTALLED LOCATION SHOWN ON THE SHOP DRAWINGS. THE SYMBOL FOR EACH PRODUCT SHALL

BE A SCALED REPRESENTATION OF THE FOOTPRINT OF THE EQUIPMENT OR THE VALVE BOX IN WHICH THE EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL VALVE BOXES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT PER THE OWNER APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS. ONCE

THE SHOP DRAWING LOCATIONS ARE APPROVED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR

OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE WILL ALLOW NO ADJUSTMENTS TO THE APPROVED VALVE BOX PLACEMENT WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. ANY

IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT INSTALLED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL WITH SHOP DRAWINGS

WILL BE SUBJECT TO RELOCATION BASED ON DIRECTION BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE

ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT
USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS.

IRRIGATION CONTROLLER IS A WEATHER BASED CONTROLLER.

BUILDINGS ON SITES WITH OVER 2,500 SQ. FT. OF CUMULATIVE IRRIGATED LANDSCAPED

AREAS SHALL HAVE IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS WHICH ARE EITHER WEATHER OR SOIL BASED (PER SECTION 4.304.2)

FOR PROJECTS THAT INCLUDE LANDSCAPE WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CERTIFICATION, FORM GRN 12, SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVAL. (PER STATE ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1881)

AN OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL INCLUDING, AT MINIMUM, THE ITEMS LISTED IN SECTION 4.410.1, SHALL BE COMPLETED AND PLACED IN THE BUILDING AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION.

PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICES ARE REQUIRED IF WATER PRESSURE IS BELOW OR EXCEEDS THE RECOMMENDED PRESSURE OF THE SPECIFIED IRRIGATION DEVICES.

NO OVERHEAD IRRIGATION WITHIN 24" OF ANY NON-PERMEABLE SURFACE

CHECK VALVES OR ANTI-DRAIN VALVES ARE REQUIRED ON ALL SPRINKLER HEADS WHERE LOW POINT DRAINAGE COULD OCCUR.

A CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION SHALL BE FILLED OUT AND CERTIFIED EITHER BY THE

DESIGNER OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, IRRIGATION PLANS, OR THE LICENSED LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PROJECT.

A DIAGRAM OF THE IRRIGATION PLAN SHOWING HYDROZONES SHALL BE KEPT WITH THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER FOR SUBSEQUENT MANAGEMENT PURPOSES.

AN IRRIGATION AUDIT REPORT SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION.

AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION, THE PERMIT APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE THE OWNER

OF THE PROPERTY WITH A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION, CERTIFICATE OF INSTALLATION, IRRIGATION SCHEDULE OF LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE.

UNLESS CONTRADICTED BY A SOILS TESTS, COMPOST AT A RATE OF A MINIMUM OF FOUR CUBIC YARDS PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF PERMEABLE AREA SHALL BE INCORPORATED TO A DEPTH OF SIX INCHES INTO THE SOIL.

DEDICATED WATER SERVICE METERS OR PRIVATE SUB-METERS ARE TO INSTALLED FOR ALL NON RESIDENTIAL IRRIGATED LANDSCAPES 1,000 SQUARE FEET UP TO 5,000 SQUARE FEET AND RESIDENTIAL IRRIGATED LANDSCAPES OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET OR GREATER.

ALL IRRIGATION EMISSION DEVICES WILL MEET THE CRITERIA AS SET FORTH IN MWELO SECTION 492.7(a)(1)(M) AND SHALL BE INSTALLED AND OPERATED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS/RECOMENDATIONS.

RECIRCULATING WATER SYSTEMS SHALL BE USED FOR WATER FEATURES CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE IN PLACE ALL EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS.

ANY MONUMENTS DISTURBED SHALL BE RESET BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR AND THE APPROPRIATE CORNER RECORD MUST BE FILED WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.

I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE

WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT

A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE
SIGNATURE: DATE:
02/08/24
IRRIGATION CONTROLLER "A";
REFER TO NOTE "B"
EXISTING 1 1/2" DOMESTIC

WATER METER
IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION #1;
REFER TO NOTE "A" BELOW RIGHT

DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY

LINE TO RESIDENCE
SCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0"
4 06/28/24
108
MODEL NO. / DESCRIPTION IRRIGATION MATERIAL LEGEND SYMBOL MANUFACTURER FLOW RATE (GPM) PSI RADIUS DETAIL PVC PIPE 3/4" - 1 1/4" SCH. 40, SOLVENT WELD WITH SCH. 40 PVC FITTINGS, AS LATERAL LINES INSTALLED 12" BELOW FINISHED GRADE PAVING, HARDSCAPE, ETC. (OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE) INSIDE SLEEVES. SLEEVES UNDER PEDESTRIAN PAVINGPVC PIPE SCH. 40 AS SLEEVING, 2 TIMES THE DIAMETER OF PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE CARRIED (2" MINIMUM SIZE) INSTALL ALL PIPE AND WIRE UNDERP7079D POLYETHYLENE INSULATED, SOLID COPPER CONDUCTOR IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRE #14UF AWG DIRECT BURIAL (U.L. APPROVED). PILOT GDBRY6 DIRECT BURIAL, 100% SILICONE GEL, WATER-PROOF WIRE CONNECTORS FOR USE ON ALL WIRE SPLICES AND CONNECTIONS120 VOLT ELECTRICAL POWER FOR CONTROLLER, PROVIDED BY ELECTRICIAN, VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATION IN FIELD AS APPROVED AS APPROVED N/A GPH IRRIGATION PAIGE ELECTRIC EXISTING 1 1/2" POTABLE (DOMESTIC) WATER METER WITH 1 1/2" SERVICE LINE. VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND PRESSURE IN FIELD. 975XLS, 1 1/4" R/P BACK FLOW PREVENTION DEVICE WITH WYE STRAINER, INSTALL WITH BRASS NIPPLES, UNIONS AND FITTINGS, SIZED PER DEVICE LASCO P.O.C. WILKINS NDS (K.B.I.) KSC-XXX-S SWING CHECK VALVE, LATERAL LINE SIZE, INSTALL ONE (1) ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF EACH RCV WHEN THE RCV IS LOWER THAN MBCRE LASCO AS APPROVED BUCKNER 3200-100 1" NORMALLY CLOSED, BRASS MASTER CONTROL VALVE. WIRE MCV TO THE CONTROLLER USING A SEPARATE PILOT AND GROUND WIRE, V17101N-SC 1 1/2" SLO-CLOSE SCH. 80 PVC, TRUE-UNION BALL VALVE WITH SOLVENT WELD SOCKET CONNECTIONS, LINE SIZE PER MAINLINE. AS APPROVED PVC PIPE 1 1/2" SCH. 40, SOLVENT WELD WITH SCH. 80 PVC FITTINGS, AS MAINLINES INSTALLED 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE 1" SCH. 40 PVC, GRAY ELECTRICAL CONDUIT FOR FLOW SENSOR / MASTER VALVE WIRES, PROVIDE PULL BOX AT A MAXIMUM OF 200 FEET ON CENTER FOR A 3 FOOT WIRE LOOP OR ANY SPLICES. INSTALL INSIDE A STANDARD RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX. ALL FITTINGS USED WITH SOLVENT WELD MAINLINE PIPE SHALL BE SCH. 80 PVC FITTINGS, GRAY IN COLOR, AND SIZED TO MATCH THE MAINLINE PIPE. ALL FITTINGS USED WITH SOLVENT WELD LATERAL LINE PIPE SHALL BE SCH. 40 PVC, WHITE IN COLOR, AND SIZED TO MATCH THE LATERAL LINE PIPE. ALL THREADED PVC NIPPLES SHALL BE SCH. 80 PVC PIPE, DARK GRAY IN COLOR, WITH MOLDED THREADS.

P.R. (TRI.) F THE SPRINKLERS, BUBBLERS OR DRIP EMITTERS. INSTALL WITHIN SPRINKLER / BUBBLER / DRIP ZONES AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT LOW HEAD DRAINAGE. AS APPROVED ALL SOLVENT WELD CONNECTIONS FOR BOTH MAINLINE AND LATERAL LINE SHALL BE MADE USING THE TWO-STEP PROCESS OF PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT. PRIMER SHALL BE LOW VOC "PURPLE PRIMER". MAINLINE SOLVENT CEMENT SHALL BE LOW VOC, "GRAY-HEAVY BODY" CEMENT. LATERAL LINE SOLVENT CEMENT SHALL BE LOW VOC, GRAY OR BLUE COLORED MEDIUM BODIED CEMENT. USE DAUBERS SIZED AT LEAST ONE-HALF THE SIZE OF THE LARGEST PIPE BEING JOINED. ALL SOLVENT CEMENTED JOINTS SHALL BE MADE PER THE PIPE AND FITTING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. F GPH IRRIGATION/ V ROUTE INSIDE 1" SCH. 40 PVC (GRAY) ELECTRICAL CONDUIT. INSTALL INSIDE A STANDARD RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX. INSTALL INSIDE A 10" ROUND VALVE BOX. HUNTER SOLAR-SYNC-SEN WIRED RAIN SENSOR, MOUNT TO EXTERIOR OF BUILDING IN A WEATHER EXPOSED LOCATION AND WIRE TO THE CONTROLLER. SHALL BE INSTALLED 24" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. SLEEVES UNDER VEHICULAR PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED 36" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. NO SYMBOL NO SYMBOL NO SYMBOL WIRES SHALL BE RED IN COLOR, COMMON GROUND WIRE SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR, SPARE WIRES SHALL BE YELLOW IN COLOR. WHERE MULTIPLE CONTROLLERS ARE USED ON THE PROJECT, EACH CONTROLLER SHALL HAVE A DIFFERENT COLOR FOR PILOT WIRES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUTE TWO (2) SPARE CONTROL WIRES (YELLOW) FROM THE CONTROLLER ALONG THE MAINLINE IN ALL DIRECTIONS AWAY FROM THE CONTROLLER. LOOP SPARE WIRES UP AND INTO EACH VALVE BOX ALONG THE MAINLINE, PROVIDING A 3 FOOT MINIMUM LOOP. NO SYMBOL NO SYMBOL NO SYMBOL KC-XXX-S SPRING CHECK VALVE, LATERAL LINE SIZE, INSTALL ONE (1) ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF EACH RCV WHEN THE RCV IS HIGHER THAN THE SPRINKLERS, BUBBLERS OR DRIP EMITTERS. INSTALL WITHIN SPRINKLER / BUBBLER / DRIP ZONES AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT LOW HEAD DRAINAGE. NO SYMBOL ALL VALVE BOXES SHALL BE VB SERIES, PLASTIC TYPE WITH OVERLAPPING LIDS. VALVE BOX BODIES SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR. LIDS FOR BOXES IN TURF AREAS SHALL BE GREEN. LIDS FOR VALVE BOXES IN SHRUB AREAS SHALL BE BLACK. ALL BOXES SHALL BE SECURED WITH A RAIN BIRD VB-LOCK-P PENTA HEAD BOLT, WASHER AND CLIP. BOXES SHALL BE AS SHOWN BELOW: DESCRIPTION 10" ROUND BOXES STANDARD RECTANGULAR BOXES JUMBO RECTANGULAR BOXES VB-10RND VB-STD VB-JMB TURF AREAS (GREEN LIDS) VB-10RNDB (BOX) AND VB-10RNDBKL (LID) VB-STDB (BOX) AND VB-STDBKL (LID) VB-JMBB (BOX) AND VB-JMBBKL (LID) SHRUB AREAS (BLACK BOXES AND LIDS) NO SYMBOL RAIN BIRD GC,H N/A IKLNQN/A N/A RRSN/A N/A N/A R,S,T TN/A N/A U RAIN BIRD 30 NDS (K.B.I.) HUNTER .50 (1.0 TOTAL) 1 FT NETAFIM HUNTER HUNTER RD-06-S 6" POP-UP BUBBLER HEAD WITH A HUNTER MSBN-50Q STREAM BUBBLER NOZZLE 1.00 IN./HR. A,B EACH SYMBOL REPRESENTS TWO (2) BUBBLERS, TO PROVIDE A TOTAL OF TWO (2) BUBBLERS PER TREE. PLACE THE BUBBLER HEADS SIX (6) INCHES FROM THE ROOT BALL OF THE TREE AND ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF TREE OR PALM. ADJUST BUBBLER STREAMS TO WET THE ROOT BALL AND ADJACENT AMENDED SOIL WITHOUT HITTING THE TRUNK OF THE TREE. NO SYMBOL WILKINS 500XL-HLR 1 1/4" BRONZE, HIGH LOW RANGE (10-125 PSI) PRESSURE REGULATOR, WITH SINGLE UNION FIPT X FIPT CONNECTIONS, INSTALL PRESSURE REGULATOR ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE BACK FLOW DEVICE. SET WATER PRESSURE TO 10 PSI ABOVE DESIGN PRESSURE SHOWN ON POC NOTES. I RAIN BIRD RD-06-S 6" POP-UP BUBBLER HEAD WITH A HUNTER MSBN-25Q STREAM BUBBLER NOZZLE .25 30 1 FT 1.00 IN./HR. A,B EACH SYMBOL REPRESENTS ONE (1) BUBBLER PER SHRUB. IC-600-PL 6 STATION BASE CONTROLLER WITH ONE (1) ICM-600 EXPANSION MODULE, CREATING A TOTAL OF 12 STATIONS. CONTROLLER SHALL BE INSTALLED ON WALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. HC-100-FLOW 1" FLOW SENSING SUB-METER, WIRE TO CONTROLLER USING TWO (2) #14UF AWG WIRES INSIDE A 1" SCH. 40 PVC (GRAY) ELECTRICAL CONDUIT. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND INSIDE A STANDARD RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX. RAIN BIRD MK,ML,M HUNTER HUNTER NO SYMBOL LASCO M GDFN DRIP FLUSH / INDICATOR NOZZLE, ORANGE IN COLOR, INSTALLED ONTO A HUNTER ECO-ID-12 12" POP-UP SPRINKLER BODY (NO PRS DEVICE). THE FLUSH NOZZLE SHALL BE CLOSED FOR NORMAL OPERATION OF THE DRIP SYSTEM. VALVES INSIDE A SINGLE JUMBO RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX. USE ALL COMPONENTS DESCRIBED IN THE DETAIL TO INSTALL THE VALVE ASSEMBLY. ULTRA-ZONE SCH. 80 PVC MANIFOLD ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE USED TO INSTALL MULTIPLE 1" SIZED REMOTE CONTROL VALVES AND DRIP REMOTE CONTROL 33DLRC 3/4" QUICK COUPLER VALVE WITH LOCKING VINYL COVER. INSTALL WITHIN A JUMBO RECTANGULAR BOX, GROUPED WITH RCVS ICV-101G-FS-AS-ADJ 1" PRESSURE REGULATING, PLASTIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE (RCV), SET AS-ADJ PRESSURE REGULATOR TO PROVIDE THE OPERATING PRESSURE OF THE SPRINKLER / BUBBLER HEAD TO THE HIGHEST OR FARTHEST HEAD ON THE CONTROL VALVE ZONE. INSTALL THE RCV INSIDE A JUMBO RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX GROUPED WITH RCVS. ICV-101G-FS 1" PLASTIC DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. INSTALL A DISC FILTER AND AN INLINE PRESSURE REGULATOR ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF EACH DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE (DRCV). FOR 1" DRCV'S INSTALL A RAIN BIRD LCRBY-100D DISC FILTER AND A SENNINGER 1" PMR-30-MF PRESSURE REGULATOR. INSTALL THE DRCV ASSEMBLY INSIDE A JUMBO RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX GROUPED WITH RCVS. NO SYMBOL AS APPROVED PVC SUPPLY AND DISCHARGE HEADERS SHALL BE PVC LATERAL LINE PIPE (AS SHOWN BELOW), 1" MINIMUM SIZE WITH SCH. 40 PVC FITTINGS. NO SYMBOL NO SYMBOL AAAA TL SERIES 17mm BARBED FITTINGS FOR CONNECTIONS BETWEEN DRIP TUBING (TUBING-TO-TUBING ONLY). NO HEATING OF TUBING SHALL BE ALLOWED. TLHCVXR5-12 SUBSURFACE DRIP TUBING (BROWN EXTERIOR COLOR WITH A COPPER OXIDE STRIPE) WITH 0.53 GPH, PRESSURE COMPENSATING BE CONTINUOUS FLUSHING TYPE AND EQUIPPED WITH A CHECK VALVE AND ANTI-SIPHON FEATURE. DRIP TUBING SHALL BE INSTALLED 4" BELOW THE BE INSTALLED A MAXIMUM OF 4" FROM THE EDGE OF ANY HARDSCAPE OR TURF EDGE. ALL SUBSEQUENT INTERIOR ROWS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROVIDE AN EVEN SPACING ACROSS THE PLANTER WITHOUT EXCEEDING 16" MAXIMUM SPACING. INSTALL 9" PVC COATED GALVANIZED TUBING STAKES A MAXIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET ON CENTER ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE TUBING. TUBING STAKES SHALL BE MODEL #GDTS140900 AS MANUFACTURED BY TUBING ROWS, SEE SPACING REQUIREMENTS ABOVE AND IN DETAILS. STRIPE, COPPER OXIDE INFUSED EMITTERS AND A PHYSICAL BARRIER TO PREVENT ROOT INTRUSION INTO THE DRIP EMITTER. DRIP EMITTERS SHALL GPH IRRIGATION PRODUCTS (866) 582-9684. THE LINES SHOWN ON THE PLANS REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE DIRECTION AND SPACING OF THE DRIP FINISHED SOIL GRADE (NOT COUNTING MULCH) AND IN PARALLEL ROWS A MAXIMUM OF 16" ON CENTER. THE PERIMETER ROW OF DRIP TUBING SHALL CONNECTION BETWEEN DRIP TUBING AND PVC SUPPLY AND DISCHARGE HEADERS SHALL BE MADE USING SCH. 40 PVC SXT FITTINGS, TL BARBED DRIP TUBING FITTINGS AND BLANK DRIP TUBING. USE A SCH. 40 PVCVLATERAL X LATERAL X 1/2" SxSxT TEE (OR A LATERAL X 1/2" SxT 90° ELBOW) FITTING ON THE PVC LATERAL LINE HEADER, A TL050MA BARB X 1/2" MALEVADAPTER, A SHORT LENGTH OF BLANK DRIP TUBING, AND A TLTEE BARBED TEE FITTING. ALL END RUNS OF TUBING SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH A PVC DISCHARGE HEADER. NO HEATING OF TUBING SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR ASSEMBLY. NETAFIM NETAFIM NETAFIM SUB-SURFACE DRIP TUBING AS DESCRIBED BELOW: 0.53 GPH / EMITTER 30 N/A 0.70 IN./HR. EMITTERS INTERNALLY INSTALLED IN THE DRIP TUBING AT 12" O.C. SPACING. DRIP TUBING SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A CONTINUOUS EXTERIOR CUPRON THESE VINE PLANTINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TWO (2) SPCV10 1 GPH DRIP EMITTERS PER VINE PLANTING. THESE ADDITIONAL EMITTERS WHERE VINES ARE PLANTED ON WALLS, FENCES OR COLUMNS WITHIN THE DRIP TUBING ZONES, ADDITIONAL DRIP EMITTERS SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR SHALL BE PUNCHED DIRECTLY INTO THE DRIP TUBING. EMITTERS SHALL BE INSTALLED USING A SPDT EMITTER INSTALLATION TOOL. EACH DRIP BUG CAP. LOCATE EMITTERS DIRECTLY OVER THE ROOT BALL OF THE VINE PLANTINGS. EMITTER SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH AN 18" LENGTH OF EDTUBE-01 1/4" DISTRIBUTION TUBING, AN EDTUBESTK TUBING STAKE, AND A VINYL 1/4" TUBING NO SYMBOL NO SYMBOL IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES L7.20 SEAL PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER DATE ISSUANCE PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DRAWN BY OWNER Peaches, LLC 47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610 ARCHITECT STUDY Architects 81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103 LANDSCAPE Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVIL LC Engineering 889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 STRUCTURAL Holmes Structures 523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122 Los Angeles, CA 90014 SEPTIC EPD Consultants 20722 Main St. Carson, CA 90745 GEOTECH Geosoils 6634 Valjean Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91406 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP LIGHTING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 DRAWING SERIES SITE PLANS & RCPS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETAILS SCHEDULES REVISIONS CDP REV 3 33610 Pacific Coast Hwy Malibu, CA 90265 27 OCT2023 2102 W. MALIBU MAIN RESIDENCEJK/MT No. Date: Description: 04/11/2023 SIGNATURE REN DATE L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC MA T RK D . TESSIER - 5043 F C O ETATS AL I FORN DATE I A 03/31/2025 1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1 2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2 3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3 I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS. WATER AUDIT AND MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE THE CONTRACTOR WILL CONDUCT AN IRRIGATION AUDIT USING A CERTIFIED IRRIGATION AUDITOR, AFTER THE FINAL FIELD OBSERVATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL IRRIGATION COMPONENTS ARE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED BY THE PROJECT ARCHITECT FOR MAINTENANCE. THE IRRIGATION AUDIT WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: 1. PLACE FLAGS AT EACH HEAD IN THE ZONE 2. MEASURE SPACING AND MARK MID POINTS BETWEEN HEADS. 3. PLACE WATER MEASURING RECEPTACLES. 4. TAKE READINGS OF WATER LEVEL IN RECEPTACLES AND RECORD RESULTS. 5. MEASURE HEAD PRESSURE IN EACH ZONE AND RECORD RESULTS. 6. AFTER COMPLETING ZONE ADVANCE TO NEXT ZONE AND REPEAT PROCEDURE. 7. SUBMIT THE RESULTS OF THE AUDIT TO THE PROJECT ARCHITECT. THE IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE TASKS LISTED BELOW ARE INTENDED AS MINIMUM STANDARDS AND MORE FREQUENT ATTENTION MAY BE REQUIRED DEPENDING ON THE PARTICULAR SITE CONDITIONS. MAINTENANCE TASK 1. CONTROLLER CABINET - OPEN CABINET AND CLEAN OUT DEBRIS AND REPLACE BATTERY AS NECESSARY. CHECK WIRING AND REPAIR AS NEEDED AND CHECK CLOCK AND RESET IF NECESSARY. FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY 2. IRRIGATION SCHEDULE - ADJUST SCHEDULE FOR SEASONAL VARIATIONS AND OTHER CONDITIONS WHICH MAY AFFECT THE AMOUNT OF WATER NEEDED TO MAINTAIN PLANT HEALTH ADJUST AS NECESSARY. FREQUENCY: MONTHLY 3. POC - VISUALLY INSPECT COMPONENTS FOR LEAKS, PRESSURE SETTINGS, SETTLEMENT OR OTHER DAMAGE AFFECTING THE OPERATION OF A COMPONENT. REPAIR AS NEEDED. FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY 4. REMOTE CONTROL VALVES, ISOLATION VALVES AND QUICK COUPLER VALVES - VISUALLY INSPECT FOR LEAKS, SETTLEMENT, WIRE CONNECTIONS AND PRESSURE SETTINGS. REPAIR OR ADJUST AS NEEDED. FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY 5. MAINLINE & LATERALS - VISUALLY INSPECT FOR LEAKS OR SETTLEMENT OF TRENCH. FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY 6. SPRINKLERS - VISUALLY CHECK FOR ANY BROKEN MISALIGNED OR CLOGGED HEADS. HEADS WITH INCORRECT ARC, INADEQUATE COVERAGE OR OVERSPRAY AND LOW HEAD DRAINAGE. REPAIR AS NEEDED. FREQUENCY: WEEKLY 7. FILTERS AND STRAINERS - VISUALLY CHECK FOR LEAKS, BROKEN FITTING, CLEAN AND FLUSH SCREENS. AUDIT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AS DESCRIBED IN THE LATEST LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AUDITOR HANDBOOK. THE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AUDITS TO BE CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL AND THE AUDIT SCHEDULE SHALL BE CONDUCTED AT LEAST ONCE EVERY FIVE YEARS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 20, DIVISION 1 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE. MAINTENANCE SCHEDULES: MAINTENANCE SCHEDULES. A REGULAR MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE SATISFYING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE. LANDSCAPE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE WATER EFFICIENCY. A REGULAR MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, CHECKING, ADJUSTING, AND REPAIRING IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT, RESETTING THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER, AERATING AND DETHATCHING TURF AREAS, REPLENISHING MULCH, FERTILIZING, PRUNING, AND WEEDING IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. WHENEVER POSSIBLE, REPAIR OF IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE DONE WITH THE ORIGINALLY SPECIFIED MATERIALS OR THEIR EQUIVALENTS. A LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AUDIT SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED IN CHAPTER 20.09 OF TITLE 20 MAY BE RECOMMENDED. THE MAXIMUM PERIOD BETWEEN AUDITS SHALL BE FIVE YEARS. IRRIGATION AUDIT SCHEDULES: LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AUDIT SCHEDULES. A SCHEDULE OF LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AUDITS OF AT LEAST EVERY FIVE YEARS MUST BE ESTABLISHED, FOR ALL BUT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, AND OTHER PROJECTS WITH LANDSCAPE AREA LESS THAN 1 ACRE (0.405 HA). AS REQUIRED IN CHAPTER 20.09 OF TITLE 20 (UTILITY CODES), AN AUDIT SATISFYING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE. AT A MINIMUM, AUDITS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AS DESCRIBED IN THE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AUDITOR HANDBOOK, PREPARED FOR THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, WATER CONSERVATION OFFICE, THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT, WHICH IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE. THE SCHEDULE SHALL PROVIDE FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION AUDITS TO BE CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL AS DETERMINED BY THE DIRECTOR AT LEAST ONCE EVERY FIVE YEARS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 20, DIVISION 1 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CODE. 1. ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OR RELATING TO ANY PORTION OF THIS WORK ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO AND MADE A PART OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND THEIR PROVISIONS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND SERVICES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND SERVICES SHOWN IN THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE PLANS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE PERTINENT ENGINEERING OR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THE WORK INDICATED HEREIN BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 5. THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL EQUIPMENT SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN CLARITY ONLY AND IS TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN PLANTING AREAS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT UNKNOWN CONDITIONS EXIST THAT WERE NOT EVIDENT AT THE TIME THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED. ANY SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ANY WORK OR THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY FIELD CHANGES DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE OWNER. 7. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION. 8. ACTUAL LOCATION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER IS TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 9. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL PILOT WIRE FROM CONTROLLER ALONG ENTIRETY OF MAIN LINE TO THE LAST RCV ON EACH AND EVERY LEG OF MAIN LINE. LABEL SPARE WIRES AT BOTH ENDS. 10. ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS TO BE INSTALLED IN SLEEVING TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE CARRIED. SEE LEGEND FOR TYPE. ALL WIRE UNDER PAVED AREAS TO BE INSTALLED IN A SCH. 40 SLEEVE THE SIZE REQUIRED TO EASILY PULL WIRE THROUGH. ALL SLEEVES TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM DEPTH AS SHOWN ON THE SLEEVING DETAILS. SLEEVES TO EXTEND AT LEAST 12" PAST THE EDGE OF THE PAVING. 11. ALL QUICK COUPLER AND REMOTE CONTROL VALVES TO BE INSTALLED IN SHRUB OR GROUND COVER AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE. ALL QUICK COUPLER AND REMOTE CONTROL VALVES TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THE INSTALLATION DETAILS. INSTALL ALL QUICK COUPLER AND REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WITHIN 18" OF HARDSCAPE. 12. ALL HEADS ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ALL HEADS ARE TO BE ADJUSTED TO PREVENT OVERSPRAY ONTO BUILDINGS, WALLS, FENCES AND HARDSCAPE. THIS INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADJUSTMENT OF DIFFUSER PIN OR ADJUSTMENT SCREW, REPLACEMENT OF PRESSURE COMPENSATING SCREENS, REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS UNITS AND THE REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES WITH ADJUSTABLE ARC UNITS. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL CHECK VALVES TO HEADS AND LATERALS AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT LOW HEAD DRAINAGE. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE PROPER GROUNDING TECHNIQUES FOR GROUNDING THE CONTROLLER AND RELATED EQUIPMENT PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. SWEENEY AND ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDS MEASURING FOR PROPER GROUND AT LEAST ONCE ANNUALLY, AND NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS MADE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CONTACT DIGALERT OR 811 A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY EXCAVATIONS ON THE PROJECT AND SPECIFICALLY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY GROUNDING RODS. DIAL 811 OR LOG ONTO WWW.DIGALERT.ORG TO START A PROJECT TICKET. DIGALERT AND 811 IS A FREE SERVICE PROVIDED TO THE PROJECT. FAILURE TO CONTACT AND HAVE THE EXISTING UTILITIES IDENTIFIED, LOCATED AND MARKED SHALL MAKE THE CONTRACTOR SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES. IRRIGATION NOTES 109
IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES L7.20 SEAL PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER DATE ISSUANCE PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DRAWN BY OWNER Peaches, LLC 47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610 ARCHITECT STUDY Architects 81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103 LANDSCAPE Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVIL LC Engineering 889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 STRUCTURAL Holmes Structures 523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122 Los Angeles, CA 90014 SEPTIC EPD Consultants 20722 Main St. Carson, CA 90745 GEOTECH Geosoils 6634 Valjean Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91406 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP LIGHTING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 DRAWING SERIES SITE PLANS & RCPS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETAILS SCHEDULES REVISIONS CDP REV 3 33610 Pacific Coast Hwy Malibu, CA 90265 27 OCT2023 2102 W. MALIBU MAIN RESIDENCEJK/MT No. Date: Description: 04/11/2023 SIGNATURE REN DATE L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC MA T RK D . TESSIER - 5043 F C O ETATS AL I FORN DATE I A 03/31/2025 1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1 2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2 3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3 I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS. E DRIP TUBING CONNECTION C DRIP TUBING LAYOUT (PLAN VIEW) WIRE HOOP STAKES AT 5 FEET ON CENTER SPACING. INSTALL TUBING AS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND SECURE TO GRADE USING RECOMMENDED INSTALLATION: AMENDED SOIL* AMENDED SOIL/* INSTALLED AFTER TUBING INSTALLATION FINISHED GRADE TUBING INSTALLATION BRING SOIL LEVEL * AS PER LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS WIRE STAKE TO 4.5" OR 6.5" BELOW PRIOR TO DRIP 4" OR 6" DRIP TUBING BACKFILL FINAL 4.5" OF SOIL OVER THE TUBING AFTER INSTALLATION OF THE TUBING AND OBSERVATION BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. D DRIP TUBING LAYOUT (SECTION VIEW) SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. TURF, SEE PLANTING PLANS INSTALLED FIVE (5) FEET ON CENTER HEADER, PVC LATERAL LINE PIPE, 1" MINIMUM SIZE, OTHERWISE TWO ADAPTER FITTINGS FOR THE CONNECTION. FOR CONNECTIONS IN THE MIDDLE OF RUNS OF TUBING, USE A TEE FITTING AND NOTE: DRIP TUBING CONNECTION REQUIRED FOR ALL CONNECTIONS BETWEEN DRIP TUBING AND PVC HEADERS. FOR CONNECTIONS AT END RUNS OF TUBING, USE A 90° ELL FITTING AND ONE ADAPTER FITTING FOR CONNECTION. FOR TEE FITTING, ONE (1) FOR 90° ELL SHRUBS OR GROUND COVERS, INLINE DRIP TUBING WITH INTERNAL DRIP EMITTERS, SEE LEGEND FOR BRAND, MODEL AND PERFORMANCE ADAPTER FITTING, TWO (2) REQUIRED 1/2" MIPT X 17mm BARB MALE MULCH LAYER, SEE PLANTING PLANS FINISHED GRADE SEE PLANTING PLANS SIZE PER THE DRAWINGS SCH. 80 PVC THREADED NIPPLE, 1/2" X LENGTH AS REQUIRED AMENDED SITE SOIL 12" MINIMUM GPH IRRIGATION PRODUCTS FLEXIBLE NIPPLE, TEE FITTING, HEADER SIZE BY 1/2" FINISHED GRADE #GFN050600, 1/2" MIPT X 1/2" FIPT X 6" LENGTH SCH. 40 PVC SLIP X SLIP X 1/2" FIPT DRIP TUBING SUPPLY OR DISCHARGE 4" IN SHRUB BEDS GPH IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 9" PVC COATED WIRE STAKE, #GDTS140900, OR 90° ELL FITTING, 1/2" SIZE SCH. 40 PVC THREADED TEE SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. PLAN VIEW - N.T.S. PLAN VIEW - N.T.S. A POP-UP BUBBLER HEAD B TREE BUBBLER LAYOUT G FLUSH VALVE/INDICATOR HEAD NOTE: INSTALL INDICATOR HEAD 10" FROM THE EDGE OF PAVING OR THE PLANTER EDGE. INSTALL ORANGE COLORED INDICATOR NOZZLE ON POP-UP HEAD AND ADJUST TO FULLY CLOSED. INSTALL POP-UP INDICATOR HEAD 1/2" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE IN INSTALL POP-UP INDICATOR HEAD 10" OFF OF PAVEMENT OR THE EDGE OF SCH 40 PVC SxSxT TEE FITTING, LATERAL X LATERAL X 1/2" SIZE SIZE AS SHOWN ON LEGEND, OR DRIP SYSTEM DISCHARGE HEADER, 1" MINIMUM SIZE PER THE DRIP INSTALLATION DETAILS PVC LATERAL LINE PIPE, TYPE AND 4" PLANTED AREA SERVED BY DRIP TUBING 6" POP-UP INDICATOR HEAD, WITH A GPH IRRIGATION DRIP FLUSH NOZZLE, MODEL #GDFN, ORANGE COLORED NOZZLE TO REMAIN IN THE CLOSED 1/2" SHRUB AND GROUND COVER AREAS UNDISTURBED SOIL WITH FIPT THREADS 12" DISCHARGE HEADER SHALL BE INSTALLED 12" BELOW FINISHED SOIL GRADE, TYPICAL SUBSURFACE DRIP TUBING, DEPTH AS SHOWN ON LEGEND AND DETAIL 12" POP-UP HEAD, SEE LEGEND POSITION DURING SYSTEM OPERATION AND OPENED FOR SYSTEM FLUSHING. DIRECT FLUSH STREAM INTO PLANTER. DRIP CONNECTION ASSEMBLY, SEE DRIP TUBING CONNECTION DETAIL SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. PRE-ASSEMBLED POLY, TRIPLE SWING JOINT, 1/2" MIPT INLET AND OUTLET WITH A 12" LAY LENGTH, GPH IRRIGATION MODEL #GSJ0512. WITH PVC STREET ELL. 12" POP-UP HEAD SWING JOINT CONFIGURATION TWELVE (12) INCH POP-UP SPRINKLER HEAD SIX (6) INCH POP-UP SPRINKLER HEAD 12" LEGEND AND PIPE INSTALLATION DETAIL FINISHED GRADE AT DEPTH SHOWN ON PVC LATERAL LINE PIPE, TYPE AND SIZE AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS, INSTALL BELOW 1/2" SIZE WITH FIPT THREADS SCH 40 PVC SxSxT TEE FITTING, LATERAL X LATERAL X INSTALL SPRAY HEADS 4" FROM PAVING EDGE IN TURF AREAS. AREA WITHOUT OVERSPRAY ONTO PAVING, FENCES, WALLS OR BUILDINGS. INSTALL SPRAY HEADS PLUMB. ADJUST NOZZLE STREAM TO COVER THE LANDSCAPE INSTALL SPRAY HEADS 6" FROM PAVING EDGE IN SHRUB AND GROUND COVER AREAS. INSTALL SPRAY HEADS 12" FROM THE FACE OF BUILDING WALLS OR WINDOWS. NOTE: INLET HAS 1/2" NPT THREADS. FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS INSTALL POP-UP SPRAY HEAD FLUSH WITH GRADE IN SHRUB AND GROUND COVER AREAS INSTALL POP-UP SPRAY HEAD 1/2" ABOVE FINISHED UNDISTURBED SOIL MODEL, FEATURES, AND NOZZLES REQUIRED. SPRINKLER POP-UP SPRAY HEAD, 6" - 12" HEIGHT, SEE LEGEND FOR BRAND, 1/2" PRE-ASSEMBLED POLY, TRIPLE SWING JOINT, 1/2" MIPT INLET AND OUTLET WITH A 12" LAY LENGTH, SAME MANUFACTURER AS SPRINKLER HEAD. WITH PVC STREET ELL. 6" POP-UP HEAD CONFIGURATION SHOWN. UNDISTURBED SOIL ROOT BALL OF TREE OR PALM AMENDED BACKFILL MIX, SEE PLANTING PLANS DRIP LINE OF CANOPY TREE OR PALM 6" POP-UP STREAM BUBBLER HEAD WITH A 90° ARC PATTERN THREE (3) STREAM BUBBLER NOZZLE, SEE THE LEGEND FOR ALL 3/4" PVC LATERAL LINE PIPE FROM RCV REQUIRED COMPONENTS. ADJUST THE NOZZLE STREAMS TO WET THE ROOT BALL S 3/4" PVC LATERAL LINE PIPE 3/4" PVC TEE FITTING AND AMENDED SOIL AREA WITHOUT HITTING. 6" THE TRUNK OF THE TREE OR PALM. SEE POP-UP SPRINKLER DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. S NOTE: POSITION MSBN-50Q STREAM BUBBLER HEADS 6" FROM THE ROOT BALL. VALVES AND PIPE SHOWN IN PAVING FOR CLARITY ONLY, ALL TO BE INSTALLED IN PLANTER. DRIPLINE AND PVC HEADER CONNECTION BETWEEN PAVING SURROUNDING AND ADJACENT TO PLANTER AREA TO THE PLANTER EDGE (PAVING) SHALL BE SPACED 4" FROM NOT TO EXCEED SPACING ON THE LEGEND. ROWS ADJACENT AS INDICATED ON THE LEGEND, ADJUST TO EVEN SPACING DRIPLINE TUBING ROWS, SPACING APPROXIMATELY SHOWN ON PLANS EXTENDS TO LIMITS DRIPLINE TUBING PLANS FOR SIZE, 1" MINIMUM, GRID OF DRIPLINE TUBING, SEE PVC LATERAL LINE TO ADJACENT END OF THE DRIP ZONE HARDSCAPE EDGE OR THE PVC HEADERS LOCATED 16" OFF INSTALL ON DISCHARGE HEADER FLUSH VALVE / INDICATOR HEAD, SHOWN ON PLANS EXTENDS TO LIMITS DRIPLINE TUBING MINIMUM SIZE, 12" BELOW GRADE PVC SUPPLY HEADER, SEE PLANS, 1" PLANS, 1" MINIMUM SIZE, PVC DISCHARGE HEADER, SEE FOR INSTALLATION SEE PLANS AND DETAILS DRIP CONTROL VALVE F 1" MIN. SIZE, 12" BELOW GRADE PVC SUPPLY HEADER, SEE PLANS, 12" BELOW GRADE INSTALLED 12" BELOW GRADE DRIPLINE AND PVC HEADER CONNECTION BETWEEN THE PAVING EDGE. ALL ROWS SHALL BE PARALLEL AND AT THE SAME DEPTH. PLANS FOR SIZE, 1" MINIMUM, GRID OF DRIPLINE TUBING, SEE PVC LATERAL LINE TO ADJACENT INSTALLED 12" BELOW GRADE CENTER FEED SUPPLY DISCHARGE HEADER, END FEED SUPPLY HEADER, HEADER, USE TEES USE 90° ELBOWS USE 90° ELBOW FITTINGS FOR TUBING GRID ACROSS PLANTED AREAS DRIPLINE TUBING EXTEND TUBING GRID (TYPICAL) PLANTED AREAS FOR DRIPLINE PVC HEADERS EXTEND ACROSS 6" IN TURF AREAS TO INSURE EVEN PARALLEL AND LEVEL TUBING ROWS IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE SOIL LEVEL IN THE PLANTER AREAS BE BROUGHT TO 4.5" BELOW FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS AND 6.5" BELOW FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS AND PROPERLY COMPACTED AS PER THE LANDSCAPED DRAWINGS PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE TUBING. NOTE: 3. PUNCH EMITTERS DIRECTLY INTO THE DRIP TUBING, MINIMUM 3" FROM INTERNAL EMITTERS. 1. INSTALL DRIP TUBING IN PLANTERS AS INDICATED ON DRIP TUBING DETAILS. 2. FOR EACH VINE, INSTALL TWO (2) ADDITIONAL 1.0 GPH DRIP EMITTERS TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL WATER TO THE VINE. 4. USE 1/4" DRIP TUBING, 24" MAXIMUM PER EMITTER, TO DIRECT WATER FROM EMITTER ONTO THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL OF THE VINE PLANT. EDGE OF TURF, WALKWAY, DRIVEWAY OR PAVING 5. INSTALL A PLASTIC TUBING STAKE AND A BUG CAP ONTO THE END OF EACH LENGTH OF 1/4" TUBING FROM THE EMITTER. STAKE 1/4" TUBING DOWN TO THE SOIL GRADE DRIP TUBING IN PLANTER AREA BUILDING, WALL OR FENCE VINE PLANTING, SEE PLANTING PLANS PLANTING OR GROUND COVER, SEE PLANTING PLANS 1 GPH EMITTER, PUNCH INTO DRIP TUBING 1/4" TUBING, STAKE & BUG CAP, 1 / EMITTER USING WIRE TUBING STAKES, INSTALL STAKES 12" ON CENTER. ROOT BALL OF VINE PLAN VIEW - N.T.S. F DRIP VINE EMITTERS 110
IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES L7.40 SEAL PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER DATE ISSUANCE PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DRAWN BY OWNER Peaches, LLC 47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610 ARCHITECT STUDY Architects 81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103 LANDSCAPE Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVIL LC Engineering 889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 STRUCTURAL Holmes Structures 523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122 Los Angeles, CA 90014 SEPTIC EPD Consultants 20722 Main St. Carson, CA 90745 GEOTECH Geosoils 6634 Valjean Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91406 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP LIGHTING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 DRAWING SERIES SITE PLANS & RCPS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETAILS SCHEDULES REVISIONS CDP REV 3 33610 Pacific Coast Hwy Malibu, CA 90265 27 OCT2023 2102 W. MALIBU MAIN RESIDENCEJK/MT No. Date: Description: 04/11/2023 SIGNATURE REN DATE L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC MA T RK D . TESSIER - 5043 F C O ETATS AL I FORN DATE I A 03/31/2025 1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1 2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2 3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3 I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS. 2" BRASS NIPPLES, LENGTH AS REQUIRED COPPER FEMALE ADAPTER TYPE K COPPER PIPE FROM WATER METER "SMOOTH TOUCH" STAINLESS STEEL SCH 80 PVC NIPPLE, 6" MINIMUM LENGTH FINISH GRADE BRASS THREADED 90° ELL, TYPICAL R/P PRINCIPLE BACKFLOW DEVICE WITH BB B C B P B B B A BRONZE WYE STRAINER AND TWO (2) BRASS BALL VALVES, SEE LEGEND FOR BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY ENCLOSURE BRASS UNION, ONE (1) REQUIRED IF A CONCRETE SLAB SCH 80 PVC FEMALE ADAPTER PVC MAINLINE TO MASTER VALVE 12" MIN. FLOW BRAND, MODEL AND SIZE IF SPECIFIED B PRESSURE REGULATOR, IF SPECIFIED SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. PRV IS SPECIFIED, TWO (2) REQUIRED IF PRV NOT SPECIFIED, ONE (1) PER LEG CONCRETE SLAB SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" THICK, 18" WIDE AND EXTEND AT LEAST 8" PAST THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY PIPING, OR BE THE SIZE REQUIRED BY THE ENCLOSURE MANUFACTURER. USE AN APPROVED, NON-HARDENING, TEFLON ASSEMBLY PASTE ON ALL THREADED FITTINGS. ASSEMBLY PIPING AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SIZED EQUAL TO THE SIZE OF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE BACKFLOW DEVICE OUTLET SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 12" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. NOTE: INSTALL THE PRESSURE REGULATOR ONLY IF IT IS SPECIFIED IN THE LEGEND. H BACKFLOW PREVENTOR I MASTER CONTROL VALVE SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. 2" 2" MIN. FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS 2" FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREAS 24" WIRE LOOPS AND PVC MAINLINE TO FLOW GPH GDBRY6 WATERPROOF SENSOR, PIPE PER PLANS WIRE CONNECTORS LANDSCAPE FABRIC TO 3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL, 4" MINIMUM DEPTH COVER BOTTOM AND ALL SIDES OF VALVE BOX BRICK SUPPORTS, FOUR (4) REQUIRED ELECTRIC MASTER CONTROL VALVE, SEE LEGEND FOR TYPE MIN. P C AND SPECIFICATIONS WIRE PATH TO CONTROLLER, IN CONDUIT NOTE: FLOW USE STANDARD OPENINGS PROVIDED IN VALVE BOX FOR PIPE, DO NOT CUT BOX. LASCO #896 PVC UNION SLIP X MIPT, SIZE PER RCV, 2 REQUIRED FOR ASSEMBLY PVC MAINLINE FROM BACKFLOW DEVICE OR BASKET STRAINER, USE SCH 80 PVC 45° ELBOWS TO ACHIEVE MAINLINE DEPTH AS REQUIRED PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH T-COVER AND CAPTIVE STAINLESS STEEL BOLT AND LOC-KIT. INSTALL BOX AT RIGHT ANGLE TO ADJACENT HARDSCAPE EDGE. HEAT BRAND "MCV" ONTO LID. J FLOW SENSING SUB-METER SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. K BALL VALVE CL LASCO "SLO-CLOSE" SCH. 80 PVC, BRICK SUPPORTS, FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS PVC IRRIGATION MAINLINE, 6" DIAMETER PVC CL. 160 PIPE, ONE CUBIC FOOT OF 3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL 6" THREE (3) REQUIRED TRU-UNION BALL VALVE, WITH PVC LENGTH AS REQUIRED, 12" MINIMUM SEE LEGEND FOR SPECIFICATION SOCKET CONNECTIONS. SOLVENT WELD PVC CONNECTIONS SIZE PER MAINLINE SIZE 2" FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT. NOTE: PROVIDE ONE (1) 30" LONG STEEL "VALVE KEY" FOR EACH TEN (10) BALL VALVES PLASTIC 10" ROUND VALVE BOX WITH T-COVER AND CAPTIVE STAINLESS STEEL BOLT AND LOCK-KIT. HEAT BRAND "BV" ONTO LID. M COMBINED REMOTE CONTROL VALVES AND QUICK COUPLER WITHIN ONE VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY 2" MIN. FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS 2" FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREAS HEAT BRAND "FS" ONTO LID. CAPTIVE STAINLESS STEEL BOLT AND LOC-KIT. INSTALL PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH T-COVER AND BOX AT RIGHT ANGLE TO ADJACENT HARDSCAPE EDGE. 24" WIRE LOOPS AND PVC MAINLINE TO RCVS 3M DBY-6 WATERPROOF PIPE PER PLANS AND SPECS. WIRE CONNECTORS 3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL, LANDSCAPE FABRIC TO 4" MINIMUM DEPTH COVER BOTTOM AND ALL SIDES OF VALVE BOX BRICK SUPPORTS, 4 REQUIRED FLOW SENSOR, SEE LEGEND FOR BRAND, MODEL AND SIZE CONTROL WIRES TO CONTROLLER, IN CONDUIT PVC MAINLINE FROM MASTER CONTROL VALVE, NOTE: USE STANDARD OPENINGS PROVIDED IN VALVE BOX FOR PIPE, DO NOT CUT BOX. FLOW USE SCH 80 PVC 45 DEGREE ELLS TO ACHIEVE MAINLINE DEPTH AS REQUIRED. 4" MIN. 10 PIPE DIA. 5 PIPE DIA. NO FITTINGS WITHIN 10 PIPE DIA. UP STREAM AND 5 PIPE DIA. DOWN STREAM OF SENSOR SPEARS SCH 80 PVC (SLIP) X BRASS (FIPT) FEMALE ADAPTER TRANSITION FITTING. SIZE PER METER, TWO REQUIRED PLAN VIEW - N.T.S. TELESCOPING VALVE ADAPTER, LASCO MODEL #1236-010, FOR USE WITH MIPT FILTER FOUR (4) STANDARD OPENINGS ON THE LONG SIDE OF THE RAIN BIRD VALVE BOX FOR LATERAL LINES OUT OF THE VALVE BOX BOTTOM OF RAIN BIRD STANDARD VALVE BOX RAIN BIRD VB SERIES STANDARD VALVE BOX TOP OF RAIN BIRD STANDARD VALVE BOX USE ONE (1) OF THREE (3) STANDARD OPENINGS ON THE SHORT SIDE OF THE RAIN BIRD VALVE BOX FOR 1" SLIP OR 1 1/4" SPIGOT 1" SCH 40 PVC MAINLINE PIPE 1" SCH 80 PVC MALE ADAPTER, SOCKET X MIPT QUAD MANIFOLD TEE, (NUT x MTHD x MVConn), LASCO MODEL #1301-410, FOR USE WITH FIPT VALVES LATERAL LINE, 1" OR 1 1/4" PVC PIPE, SEE LEGEND FOR TELESCOPING VALVE ADAPTER, LASCO MODEL 1" REMOTE CONTROL VALVE, FIPT ON BOTH ENDS, SEE LEGEND LASCO END CAP # 1348-010 ENTIRE VALVE BOX BOTTOM AND SIDES TO BE WRAPPED WITH LANDSCAPE FABRIC. INSTALL A 4" DEEP LAYER OF 3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL IN THE BOTTOM OF THE VALVE BOX. USE LASCO ULTRAZONE DOUBLE TEE (#1301210), TRIPLE TEE (#1301310), OR QUAD TEE (#1301410) UNITS FOR USE THIS ASSEMBLY FOR ANY GROUP OF TWO (2), THREE (3) OR FOUR (4) 1" REMOTE CONTROL VALVES, NOTE: USE STANDARD BOX OPENINGS FOR ALL PIPING INTO THE BOX, DO NOT CUT THE BOX. DO NOT USE TEFLON PASTE ON THE VALVE CONNECTIONS TO THE LASCO ULTRA ZONE MANIFOLD CONNECTIONS. 1" SCH 80 PVC FEMALE ADAPTER, SOCKET X FIPT ASSEMBLIES AS NEEDED. CAP UNUSED OUTLETS ON MANIFOLD TEES.

FLOW
FLOW
FLOW
FLOW FLOW FLOW #1336-010, FOR USE WITH FIPT VALVES THE MAINLINE INTO THE VALVE BOX 1" LASCO #896 SLIP X MPT SCH 80 PVC UNION FITTING MAINLINE SIZE SCH 80 PVC SLIP 90° ELBOW WITH A SCH 40 PVC REDUCER BUSHING TO REDUCE TO 1" SIZE PIPE 213456789101112131415 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 2 3 5 5 5 71112131415 5 4 4 4 FLOW
FLOW 1" SLIP OR 1 1/4" SPIGOT 17 TYPE. FOR 1 1/4" LATERAL LINE INSTALL A 1 1/4" SCH. 40 SLIP COUPLING ONTO THE END OF THE ADAPTER 16417 16 16 1" PRESSURE REGULATING BASKET FILTER, MIPT ON BOTH ENDS, SEE LEGEND 17 34 417 1819 QCV ASSEMBLY: TWO (2) 1" SCH 80 PVC THD. 90° ELLS, ONE (1) 1" X 4" SCH 80 THD. NIPPLE, ONE (1) 1" X 3/4" PVC 1819 3/4" QUICK COUPLER VALVE, TOP OF QCV TO BE 1" BELOW BOTTOM OF THE VALVE BOX LID THD. REDUCER BUSHING, ONE (1) 3/4" X 3" SCH 80 PVC THD. 1819 3 2 2 216 2 18 REBAR STAKE, AND TWO (2) S.S. HOSE CLAMPS OR FOR GROUPS OF TWO (2) OR THREE (3) 1" REMOTE CONTROL VALVES AND A 3/4" QUICK COUPLER VALVE.

USE AN APPROVED, NON-HARDENING, TEFLON ASSEMBLY PASTE ON ALL THREADED FITTINGS.USE STANDARD BOX OPENINGS FOR ALL PIPING INTO THE BOX, DO NOT CUT THE BOX. 2"2" MIN. FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS 2" BRICK SUPPORTS, FOUR (4) REQUIRED LASCO #1336-010 TELESCOPING VALVE ADAPTER, SIZE PER RCV, MIN. P C 3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL, 4" MINIMUM DEPTH SCH. 80 PVC 90° ELL FITTING* LANDSCAPE FABRIC TO COVER BOTTOM AND ALL SIDES OF VALVE BOX ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE, SEE LEGEND FOR TYPE TAPE WIRES TO RISER USING BLACK ELECTRICAL TAPE FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS LATERAL LINE, SIZE PER PLANS, TYPE PVC PIPE, AS 24" WIRE LOOPS AND GPH GDBRY6 WATERPROOF WIRE CONNECTORS SCH. 80 PVC TEE OR 90° ELL FITTING ON MAINLINE, ID VALVE NUMBER ID TAG, CHRISTY'S MODEL ID-STD-Y1 NOTE: PER LEGEND MAINLINE SIZE X RCV X RCV (TEE) OR MAINLINE SIZE X RCV (ELL) SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH T-COVER AND CAPTIVE STAINLESS STEEL BOLT AND LOC-KIT. INSTALL BOX AT RIGHT ANGLE TO ADJACENT HARDSCAPE EDGE. HEAT BRAND "RCV" AND CONTROL STATION # ONTO LID. L REMOTE CONTROL VALVE* ABOVE INDICATES 1" X MAINLINE SIZE PVC MAINLINE PIPE RISER, SIZE PER PLAN, LENGTH AS REQUIRED LASCO MODEL # 1301-410 QUAD MANIFOLD TEE 1" SIZE 111
IRRIGATION DETAILS L7.50 SEAL PROJECT NO. SHEET NAME SHEET NUMBER DATE ISSUANCE PROJECT TEAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DRAWN BY OWNER Peaches, LLC 47 W. Division Street, #362, Chicago, IL 60610 ARCHITECT STUDY Architects 81 Langton St., Unit 11, San Francisco, CA 94103 LANDSCAPE Mark Tessier Landscape Architecture, Inc. 1424 4th Street, Ste 300, Santa Monica, CA 90401 CIVIL LC Engineering 889 Pierce Ct., Ste 101 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 STRUCTURAL Holmes Structures 523 West 6th Street, Suite 1122 Los Angeles, CA 90014 SEPTIC EPD Consultants 20722 Main St. Carson, CA 90745 GEOTECH Geosoils 6634 Valjean Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91406 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP LIGHTING Company Name No. Street, City, ST ZIP A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 DRAWING SERIES SITE PLANS & RCPS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS DETAILS SCHEDULES REVISIONS CDP REV 3 33610 Pacific Coast Hwy Malibu, CA 90265 27 OCT2023 2102 W. MALIBU MAIN RESIDENCEJK/MT No. Date: Description: 04/11/2023 SIGNATURE REN DATE L I CENSED LANDSCAPE ARCH I TEC MA T RK D . TESSIER - 5043 F C O ETATS AL I FORN DATE I A 03/31/2025 1 05/24/23 CDP REV 1 2 10/27/23 CDP REV 2 3 02/06/24 CDP REV 3 I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS. NOTE: USE STANDARD BOX OPENINGS FOR ALL PIPING INTO THE BOX, DO NOT CUT THE BOX. USE AN APPROVED, NON-HARDENING, TEFLON ASSEMBLY PASTE ON ALL THREADED FITTINGS. SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. N DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE 2"2" MIN. FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS 2" BRICK SUPPORTS, FOUR (4) REQUIRED MIN. P C 3/4" CRUSHED GRAVEL, 4" MINIMUM DEPTH SCH. 80 PVC 90° ELL FITTING* LANDSCAPE FABRIC TO COVER BOTTOM AND ALL SIDES OF VALVE BOX ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE, SEE LEGEND FOR TYPE TAPE WIRES TO RISER USING BLACK ELECTRICAL TAPE FINISHED GRADE IN TURF AREAS LATERAL LINE, SIZE PER PLANS, TYPE PVC PIPE, AS 24" WIRE LOOPS AND GPH GDBRY6 WATERPROOF WIRE CONNECTORS SCH. 80 PVC TEE OR 90° ELL FITTING ON MAINLINE, ID VALVE NUMBER ID TAG, CHRISTY'S MODEL ID-STD-Y1 PER LEGEND MAINLINE SIZE X RCV X RCV (TEE) OR MAINLINE SIZE X RCV (ELL) PLASTIC RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH T-COVER AND CAPTIVE STAINLESS STEEL BOLT AND LOC-KIT. INSTALL BOX AT RIGHT ANGLE TO ADJACENT HARDSCAPE EDGE. HEAT BRAND "RCV" AND CONTROL STATION # ONTO LID. * ABOVE INDICATES 1" X MAINLINE SIZE PVC MAINLINE PIPE RISER, SIZE PER PLAN, LENGTH AS REQUIRED LASCO MODEL # 1301-410 QUAD MANIFOLD TEE 1" SIZE PRESSURE REGULATING BASKET FILTER, SEE LEGEND LASCO #1336-010 TELESCOPING VALVE ADAPTER, SIZE PER RCV O WALL MOUNTED CONT. ASSEMBLY SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. IN RIGID 1/2" CONDUIT TO ET SENSOR MOUNTED ON WALL ROUTE WIRES AND SLEEVE THROUGH WALL AS PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S INSTALL ENCLOSURE AS INDICATED BY CITY STAFF & MANUFACTURER'S CONDUIT (3") PVC ELECTRICAL SWEEP LOW VOLTAGE WIRE IN RIGID PVC RIGID ELECTRICAL CONDUIT (1") FOR SPECIFICATION. CONTROLLER, SEE LEGEND IF SPECIFIED WALL MOUNTED ENCLOSURE IN J-BOX, BY OTHERS 120 VOLT POWER SUPPLY TO ADJACENT PLANTER CONCRETE WALK BY OTHERS RECOMMENDATION. RECOMMENDATION. NOTE: 48" P PIPE INSTALLATION SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. SIZES 3" AND 4" SIZES 3/4" TO 2 1/2" PIPE SIZES A FINISH SOIL GRADE A B C D D D D D IRRIGATION NON-PRESSURE LATERAL LINE IRRIGATION PRESSURE MAINLINE LOW VOLTAGE CONTROL WIRES, IN CONDUIT IF SPECIFIED ON LEGEND UNDISTURBED SITE SOIL CLEAN, COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL, CLEAN SOIL PIPE BEDDING, SEE CHART SEPARATION BETWEEN PIPES AND TRENCH WALLS, SEE CHART 12" 18" B18" 24" C18" 24" D4" 4" SIZES 6" AND LARGER 30" 24" 6" SEE SPECIFICATIONS CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CONTACT 811 OR DIGALERT A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION ON THE PROJECT. DIAL 811 OR LOG ONTO WWW.DIGALERT.ORG. NOTE: Q SLEEVE INSTALLATION R WIRE CONNECTION SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. KIT SHALL INCLUDE A SCOTCHLOK SPRING CONNECTOR, A POLYPROPYLENE TUBE AND A 100% SILICONE WATERPROOF SEALING GEL. TUBE SHALL BE SUPPLIED PRE-FILLED WITH GEL. WIRE CONNECTOR SHALL BE A GPH IRRIGATION GDBRY6 DIRECT BURY SPLICE KIT. NOTE: INSERTED INTO TUBE UNTIL THE SCOTCHLOK CONNECTOR AND WIRES CONNECTOR PASSES LOCK TABS SILICONE WATERPROOF GEL POLY TUBE PRE-FILLED WITH 100% ONCE CONNECTOR IS INSERTED LOCK TABS PREVENT WIRE REMOVAL SCOTCHLOK ELECTRICAL SPRING CONNECTOR. WIRES SHALL BE PRE-STRIPPED OF 1/2" OF THE INSULATION PRIOR TO INSERTION CONNECTOR ONTO WIRES TO INTO THE CONNECTIOR. TWIST SEAT FIRMLY. IS INSERTED INTO TUBE WIRES PASS THROUGH GROOVES IN TUBE LID TO ALLOW LID TO CLOSE CLOSE TUBE LID AFTER WIRE LOW VOLTAGE WIRES, 3 MAXIMUM SECTION VIEW - N.T.S. UNDER PEDESTRIAN PAVING PIPE SIZES A PAVING, SEE SITE PLANS A B C D D D D D IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE IN SLEEVE IRRIGATION MAINLINE IN SLEEVE LOW VOLTAGE CONTROL WIRES, OR CONDUIT, IN SLEEVE UNDISTURBED SITE SOIL SAND BACKFILL COMPACTED TO CLEAN SOIL PIPE BEDDING, SEE CHART SEPARATION BETWEEN PIPES AND TRENCH WALLS, SEE CHART 12" B24" C24" D4" UNDER VEHICULAR PAVING 36" 36" 6" EQUAL DENSITY OF EXISTING SOIL OR PAVING BASE MATERIAL 24" SLEEVES SHALL BE TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE CARRIED WITHIN, EXCEPT WHEN SLEEVES SHALL EXTEND 12" PAST THE EDGE OF PAVING INTO THE PLANTER. USING BELL AND GASKET PIPING WHERE MAINLINE SLEEVES SHALL BE 2.5 TIMES THE SIZE OF THE PIPE. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CONTACT 811 OR DIGALERT A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION ON THE PROJECT. DIAL 811 OR LOG ONTO WWW.DIGALERT.ORG. NOTE: 12" 12" 12" REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. BOX LOCATIONS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO MAINLINE INSTALLATION FOR QCV BOX, TYPICAL 18"12" BE INSTALLED IN TURF AREAS WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. NOTE: VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SHRUB AND GROUND COVER AREAS. NO VALVES SHALL ALIGN BOX EDGES BALL VALVE BOX, TYPICAL VALVE BOX, TYPICAL EDGE OF TURF, WALKWAY, DRIVEWAY OR PAVING 18" COLLAPSE AND / OR DEFORMATION OF VALVE BOXES. 4. AVOID HEAVILY COMPACTING SOIL AROUND VALVE BOXES TO PREVENT THE EVER POSSIBLE, VALVES IN TURF AREAS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 2. SET RCV AND VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY IN GROUND COVER OR SHRUB AREAS WHERE FACILITATE SERVICING OF THE VALVE OR EQUIPMENT. 1. CENTER VALVE BOX OVER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE OR DRIP ASSEMBLY TO 3. SET BOXES PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO ADJACENT PAVING EDGE. NOTE: PLAN VIEW - N.T.S. QCV RCV A13 RCV A15 RCV A14 BVS VALVE BOX LAYOUT 112

BIOLOGY REVIEW

REFERRAL SHEET
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4804 (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 456-7650
FROM:

TO: City of Malibu Biologist
City of Malibu Planning Department REVISED DATE02/22/2024 JOB ADDRESS: 33610 PACIFIC COAST HWY
APPLICANT / CONTACT: Justin Block, Block and Block
APPLICANT ADDRESS: 1880 Century Park East
APPLICANT PHONE #: (310) 552-3336
APPLICANT FAX #: (310) 552-1850
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NSFR, NOWTS, pool, spa, retaining wall Los Angeles, CA 90067
PROJECT NUMBER: CDP 19-011
APPLICANT EMAIL: [email protected]
Malibu Planning Department and/or Applicant
FROM: City Biologist, Courtney McCammon
PLANNER: Adam Pisarkiewicz
TO:

The project review package is INCOMPLETE and; CANNOT proceed through Final Planning Review until corrections and conditions from Biological Review are incorporated into the proposed project design
(See Attached).

The project is APPROVED, consistent with City Goals & Policies associated with the protection of biological resources and CAN proceed through the Planning process.

The project may have the potential to significantly impact the following resources, either individually or cumulatively: Sensitive Species or Habitat, Watersheds, and/or Shoreline Resources and therefore Requires Review by the Environmental Review Board (ERB).

Signature Date
Additional requirements/conditions may be imposed upon review of plan revision Contact Information:

Courtney McCammon, City Biologist, [email protected], (310) 456-2489, extension 277 Rev 05/29/2018
X
3/3/24
ATTACHMENT 3
113
City of Malibu
Biology ● Planning Department
23825 Stuart Ranch Road · Malibu, California · 90265-4861 Phone (310) 456-2489 · Fax (310) 456-3356 · www.malibucity.org

Page 1 of 4 ends

Malibu City CouncilMarch 18, 2026

Malibu City Council
March 18, 2026