Agenda packet, second session — Malibu City Council, May 20, 2026 (part 4 of 7)

______________________

Colors and Materials

30. The project is visible from a scenic road, therefore, shall incorporate colors and exterior materials that are compatible with the surrounding landscape. a. Acceptable colors shall be limited to colors compatible with the surrounding environment (earth tones) including shades of green, brown and gray, with no white or light shades and no bright tones. Colors shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and clearly indicated on the building plans. b. The use of highly reflective materials shall be prohibited except for solar energy panels or cells, which shall be placed to minimize significant adverse impacts to public views to the maximum extent feasible.
c. All windows shall be comprised of non-glare glass.

31. All driveways shall be a neutral color that blends with the surrounding landforms and vegetation. Retaining walls shall incorporate veneers, texturing and/or colors that blend with the surrounding earth materials or landscape. The color of driveways and retaining walls shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and clearly indicated on all grading, improvement and/or building plans.

Fuel Modification

32. Prior to the issuance of final building permits, the project shall receive LACFD approval of a Final Fuel Modification Plan.

Site Specific Conditions

33. The project shall comply with all requirements and conditions of the LACFD.

Biology/Landscaping

34. Except as permitted pursuant to the provisions in LUP policies 3.18 and 3.20, throughout the City of Malibu, development that involves the use of pesticides, including insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides or any other similar toxic chemical substances, shall be prohibited in cases where the application of such substances would have the potential to significantly degrade Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas or coastal water quality or harm wildlife.

Herbicides may be used for the eradication of invasive plant species or habitat restoration, but only if the use of non-chemical methods for prevention and management such as physical, mechanical, cultural, and biological controls are infeasible. Herbicides shall be restricted to the least toxic product and method, and to the maximum extent feasible, shall be biodegradable, derived from natural sources, and used for a limited time.

35. Prior to installation of any landscaping, the applicant shall obtain a plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division.

DRAFT 116
Resolution No. 25-03

Page 11 of 22 ends

______________________

36. Prior to final Planning inspection or other final project sign off (as applicable), the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director for review and approval a certificate of completion in accordance with the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance (MMC Chapter 17.53). The certificate shall include the property owner’s signed acceptance of responsibility for maintaining the landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans and MMC Chapter 17.53.

37. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City of Malibu, are prohibited.

38. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to significantly obstruct the primary view from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth).

39. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote or copper arsenate.

40. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.

41. No development is permitted on slopes steeper than 4 to 1.

42. Prior to a final plan check approval, the property owner /applicant must provide a landscape water use approval from the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29.

43. Vegetation forming a view impermeable condition serving the same function as a fence or wall (also known as a hedge) located within the side or rear yard setback shall be maintained at or below a height of six feet. A hedge located within the front yard setback shall be maintained at or below a height of 42 inches. Three violations of this condition will result in a requirement to permanently remove the vegetation from the site.

44. Vegetation in excess of six feet in height shall not obstruct the primary view of existing residences located within a 1,000-foot radius at any given time (given consideration of its future growth).

45. Plantings required for fuel modification, except for within irrigated Zone A nearest to approved residential structures, must be native, drought-tolerant species and shall blend with the existing natural vegetation and natural habitats on the site.

46. Grading shall be scheduled only during the dry season from April 1 – October 31. If it becomes necessary to conduct grading activities from November 1 – March 31, a comprehensive erosion control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of a grading permit and implemented prior to initiation of vegetation removal and/or grading activities.

Page 12 of 22 ends

______________________

landscape and fuel modification plan. Failure to comply with the landscape conditions is a violation of the conditions of approval for this project.

48. All open areas not used for buildings, driveways, parking areas, or walkways shall be attractively landscaped and maintained in accordance with a landscape plan, with native plant species, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.

49. Native species of the Santa Monica Mountains, characteristic of the local habitat, shall be used on graded slopes or where slope plantings are required for slope stabilization, erosion control, and watershed protection. Plants should be selected to have a variety of rooting depths. A spacing of 15 feet between large woody (≥10-foot canopy) shrubs is recommended by the LACFD. Lawns are prohibited on slopes > 5 percent.

50. Slope planting measures such as contour planting and terracing or other techniques shall be incorporated on slopes to interrupt the flow and rate of surface runoff in order to prevent surface soil erosion.

51. Grading/excavation/vegetation removal scheduled between February 1 – September 15 will require bird nesting surveys by a qualified biologist prior to initiation of such activities.

Surveys shall be completed no more than five days from proposed initiation of site preparation activities. Should active nests be identified, a buffer area of no less than 150 feet (300 feet for raptors). Shall be fenced off until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. A report discussing the results of the surveys shall be turned in to the City within two business days of completion of surveys.

52. Construction fencing shall be placed within five feet of the limits of grading. Construction fencing shall be installed prior to the beginning of any construction and shall be maintained throughout the construction period to protect the site’s sensitive habitat areas.

53. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded so it is directed downward and inward so that there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. Up-lighting is prohibited.

54. The use of wood chips and shredded rubber is prohibited anywhere on the site. Flammable mulch material, including shredded bark, pine needles, and artificial turf, are prohibited between zero and five feet of a structure. Non-continuous use of flammable mulch (excluding wood chips and shredded rubber) is allowed between 5 and 30 feet from the eave/overhang of a structure with limited application areas. Any mulch materials (excluding wood chips and shredded rubber) are allowed 30 feet or more from a structure with no limitation on application area.

Public Works – Grading and Drainage

Page 13 of 22 ends

______________________

constructed of either six inches of concrete over four inches of aggregate base, or four inches of asphalt concrete over six inches of aggregate base. The driveway shall be flush with the existing grades with no curbs.

56. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMPs shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show all storm drain lines, inlets, outlets, post-construction BMPs and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements.

57. Clearing and grading during the rainy season (extending from November 1 to March 31) shall be prohibited for development LIP Section 17.3.1 that:
a. Is located within or adjacent to ESHA, or
b. Includes grading on slopes greater than 4:1
Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4:1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading operations before the rainy season. If grading operations are not completed before the rainy season begins, grading shall be halted and temporary erosion control measures shall be put into place to minimize erosion until grading resumes after March 31, unless the City determines that completion of grading would be more protective of resources.

58. Exported soil from a site shall be taken to the County Landfill or to a site with an active grading permit and the ability to accept the material in compliance with the City’s LIP Section 8.3. A note shall be placed on the project that addresses this condition.

59. A grading and drainage plan shall be approved containing the following information prior to the issuance of grading permits for the project.
a. Public Works Department General Notes
b. The existing and proposed square footage of impervious coverage on the property shall be shown on the grading plan (including separate areas for buildings, driveways, walkways, parking, tennis courts and pool decks). c. The limits of land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated on the grading plan and a total area shall be shown on the plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits of grading, areas disturbed for the installation of the septic system, and areas disturbed for the installation of the detention system shall be included within the area delineated.
d. The grading limits shall include the temporary cuts made for retaining walls, e. buttresses, and over excavations for fill slopes and shall be shown on the grading plan.
f. If the property contains trees that are to be protected they shall be highlighted on the grading plan.
g. If the property contains rare and endangered species as identified in the resources study the grading plan shall contain a prominent note identifying the areas to be DRAFT 119
Resolution No. 25-03

Page 14 of 22 ends

______________________

protected (to be left undisturbed). Fencing of these areas shall be delineated on the grading plan if required by the City Biologist.
h. Private storm drain systems shall be shown on the grading plan. Systems greater than 12-inch diameter shall also have a plan and profile for the system included with the grading plan.
i. Public storm drain modifications shown on the grading plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit.

60. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMPs shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show all storm drain lines, inlets, outlet, postconstruction BMP’s and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements.

61. The non-exempt grading for the project shall not exceed a total of 675 cubic yards, cut and fill.

62. The total grading yardage verification certificate shall be copied onto the coversheet of the Grading Plan. No alternative formats or substitutes will be accepted.

Public Works – Storm Water

63. A Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (LSWPPP) shall be provided prior to issuance of grading/building permits. This plan shall include an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) that includes, but is not limited to:

Erosion Controls Scheduling Erosion Controls Scheduling Preservation of Existing Vegetation
Sediment Controls
Silt Fence
Sand Bag Barrier
Stabilized Construction Entrance
Non-Storm Water Management Water Conservation Practices Dewatering Operations
Waste Management
Material Delivery and Storage
Stockpile Management
Spill Prevention and Control
Solid Waste Management
Concrete Waste Management
Sanitary/Septic Waste Management
All BMPs shall be in accordance to the latest version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) BMP Handbook. Designated areas for the storage of construction materials, solid waste management, and portable toilets must not disrupt drainage patterns or subject the material to erosion by site runoff.

DRAFT 120
Resolution No. 25-03

Page 15 of 22 ends

______________________

64. A Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted for review and approval of the Public Works Director. The WQMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage on the site. The WQMP shall meet all the requirements of the City’s current Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System (MS4) permit. The following elements shall be included within the WQMP:
a. Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs):
b. Source Control BMPs;
c. Treatment Control BMPs that retain on-site Stormwater Quality Design Volume (SWQDv). Or where it is technically infeasible to retain on-site, the project must biofiltrate 1.5 times the SWQDv that is not retained on-site; d. Drainage improvements;
e. A plan for the maintenance and monitoring of the proposed treatment BMPs for the expected life of the structure;
f. Methods of onsite percolation, site re-vegetation and an analysis for off-site project impacts;
g. Measures to treat and infiltrate runoff from impervious areas; h. A copy of the WQMP shall be filed against the property to provide constructive notice to future property owners of their obligation to maintain the water quality measure installed during construction prior to the issuance of grading or building permits; and
i. The WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and the fee applicable at the time of submittal for review of the WQMP shall be paid prior to the start of the technical review. The WQMP shall be approved prior the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading and drainage plan and/or building plans. The Public Works Department will tentatively approve the plan and will keep a copy until the completion of the project. Once the project is completed, the applicant shall verify the installation of the BMP’s, make any revisions to the WQMP, and resubmit to the Public Works Department for approval. The original signed and notarized document shall be recorded with the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. A certified copy of the WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

65. A Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shall be submitted for review and approval of the Public Works Director. The SWMP shall be prepared in accordance with the LIP Section 17.3.2 and all other applicable ordinances and regulations. The SWMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the pre-development and post-development drainage of the site.

The SWMP shall identify the site design and source control BMPs that have been implemented in the design of the project. The SWMP shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading or building permit for this project.

DRAFT 121
Resolution No. 25-03

Page 16 of 22 ends

______________________

66. The ocean between Latigo Point and the west City limits has been established by the State Water Resources Control Board as an Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) as part of the California Ocean Plan. This designation prohibits the discharge of any waste, including stormwater runoff, directly into the ASBS. The applicant shall provide a drainage system that accomplishes the following:
a. Installation of BMPs that are designed to treat the potential pollutants in the stormwater runoff so that it does not alter the natural ocean water quality. These pollutants include trash, oil and grease, metals, bacteria, nutrients, pesticides, herbicides and sediment.
b. Prohibits the discharge of trash.
c. Only discharges from existing storm drain outfalls are allowed. No new outfalls will be allowed. Any proposed or new storm water discharged shall be routed to existing storm drain outfalls and shall not result in any new contribution of waste to the ASBS (i.e., no additional pollutant loading).
d. Elimination of non-storm water discharges.

Geology

67. All recommendations of the consulting certified engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer and/or the City geotechnical consultant reviewers shall be incorporated into all final design and construction including foundations, grading, sewage disposal, and drainage. Final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City geotechnical consultant reviewers prior to the issuance of a grading permit.

68. Final plans approved by the City geotechnical consultant reviewers shall be in substantial conformance with the approved CDP relative to construction, grading, sewage disposal and drainage. Any substantial changes may require a CDP amendment or a new CDP.

Swimming Pool/Spa/Water Feature

69. Onsite noise, including that which emanates from swimming pool and air conditioning equipment, shall be limited as described in MMC Chapter 8.24 (Noise).

70. Pool and air conditioning equipment that will be installed shall be screened from view by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section

3.5.3(A).

71. All swimming pools shall contain double walled construction with drains and leak detection systems capable of sensing a leak of the inner wall.

DRAFT 122
Resolution No. 25-03

Page 17 of 22 ends

______________________
a. The discharge water is dechlorinated, debrominated or if the water is disinfected using ozonation;
b. There are sufficient BMPs in place to prevent soil erosion; and c. The discharge does not reach into the MS4 or to the ASBS (including tributaries)

73. Discharges not meeting the above-mentioned methods must be trucked to a Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Works.

74. A sign stating “It is illegal to discharge pool, spa, or water feature waters to a street, drainage course, or storm drain per MMC Section 13.04.060(D)(5)” shall be posted in the filtration and/or pumping equipment area for the property. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall indicate the method of disinfection and the method of discharging.

75. Pursuant to MMC Section 9.20.040(B), all ponds, decorative fountains shall require a water recirculating/recycling system.

Environmental Health/OWTS

76. OWTS on Architectural and Grading Plans: The final Architectural Site Plan (Sheet A-0.1) and Grading Plans must show the OWTS, including the treatment tank(s), present/future seepage pits, and all lines of connection to the residence.

77. Final OWTS Plot Plan: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a final OWTS plot plan prepared by a City Registered OWTS Designer shall be submitted showing an OWTS design meeting the minimum requirements of the MMC and the LCP, including necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property and the proposed landscape plan for the developed property. The OWTS plot plan shall show essential features of the OWTS and must fit onto an 11-inch by 17-inch sheet leaving a five-inch margin clear to provide space for a City applied legend. If the scale of the plans is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details and/or all necessary setbacks, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inches by 22 inches).

78. Final OWTS Design Report, Plans, and System Specifications: A final OWTS design report and large set of construction drawings with system specifications (four sets) shall be submitted to describe the OWTS design basis and all components proposed for use in the construction of the proposed OWTS.

79. All plans and reports must be signed by a City registered OWTS Designer, and the plans stamped by the project Geologist, Coastal Engineer, and Structural Engineer as applicable.

The final OWTS design report and construction drawings shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator with the designer’s signature, professional registration number, and stamp (if applicable).

DRAFT 123
Resolution No. 25-03

Page 18 of 22 ends

______________________

80. The final OWTS design submittal shall contain the following information (in addition to the items listed above).
a. The model and capacity of the treatment tank(s) must be discussed in the final OWTS report and clearly shown on the final OWTS plans.
b. Confirm cap depth for seepage pit at LBA-5 on OWTS plan. c. Required treatment capacity for wastewater treatment and disinfection systems.

The treatment capacity shall be specified in terms of flow rate, gallons per day, and shall be supported by calculations relating the treatment capacity to the number of bedroom equivalents, plumbing drainage fixture equivalents, and the subsurface effluent dispersal system acceptance rate. The drainage fixture unit count must be clearly identified in association with the design treatment capacity, even if the design is based on the number of bedrooms. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the treatment system shall be specified in the final design. d. Sewage and effluent pump design calculations (as applicable). e. Description of proposed wastewater treatment and/or disinfection system equipment. State the proposed type of treatment system(s) (e.g., aerobic treatment, textile filter ultraviolet disinfection, etc.); major components, manufacturers, and model numbers for "package" systems; and conceptual design for custom engineered systems.
f. Specifications, supporting geology information, and percolation test results for the subsurface effluent dispersal portion of the onsite wastewater disposal system. This must include the proposed type of effluent dispersal system (drainfield, trench, seepage pit subsurface drip, etc.) as well as the system’s geometric dimensions and basic construction features. Supporting calculations shall be presented that relate the results of soils analysis or percolation/infiltration tests to the projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate, including any unit conversions or safety factors. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the effluent dispersal system shall be specified in the final design. The projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate shall be reported in units of total gallons per day and gallons per square foot per day. Specifications for the subsurface effluent dispersal system shall be shown to accommodate the design hydraulic loading rate (i.e., average and peak OWTS effluent flow, reported in units of gallons per day). The subsurface effluent dispersal system design must take into account the number of bedrooms, fixture units and building occupancy characteristics.
g. All OWTS design drawings shall be submitted with the wet signature and typed name of the OWTS designer. If the scale of the plan is such that more space than is available on the 11” x 17” plot plan is needed to clearly show construction details, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inch by 22 inch, for review by Environmental Health). Note: For OWTS final designs, full-size plans are required for review by Building Safety Division and the Planning Department.

81. Building Plans: All project architectural plans and grading/drainage plans shall be submitted for Environmental Health review and approval. These plans must be approved by the Building Safety Division prior to receiving Environmental Health final approval.

The final floor plans must show all bedrooms and drainage fixtures in the proposed residence.

DRAFT 124
Resolution No. 25-03

Page 19 of 22 ends

______________________

82. Proof of Ownership: Proof of ownership of subject property shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator.

83. Operations and Maintenance Manual: An operations and maintenance manual specified by the OWTS designer shall be submitted to the property owner and maintenance provider of the proposed OWTS.

84. Maintenance Contract: A maintenance contract executed between the owner of the subject property and an entity qualified in the opinion of the City of Malibu to maintain the proposed onsite wastewater disposal system after construction shall be submitted. Note only original “wet signature” documents are acceptable.

85. Advanced OWTS Covenant: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a covenant running with the land shall be executed between the City of Malibu and the holder of the fee simple absolute as to subject real property and recorded with the City of Malibu Recorder’s Office. Said covenant shall serve as constructive notice to any future purchaser for value that the onsite wastewater treatment system serving the subject property is an advanced method of sewage disposal pursuant to the City of Environmental Health Administrator. The applicant shall submit a certified copy issued by the City of Malibu Recorder.

86. Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant Approval: Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

87. City of Malibu Public Works Approval: City of Malibu Public Works final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

88. City of Malibu Geologist/Geotechnical Approval: City of Malibu consulting geotechnical reviewers' final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

89. City of Malibu Planning Approval: City of Malibu Planning Department final approval of the OWTS plan shall be obtained.

90. Environmental Health Final Review Fee: A final fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of the final approval shall be paid to the City of Malibu for Environmental Health review of the OWTS design and system specifications.

91. Operating Permit Application and Fee: In accordance with the MMC, an application shall be made to the Environmental Health office for an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System operating permit. An operating permit fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of final approval shall be submitted with the application.

DRAFT 125
Resolution No. 25-03

Page 20 of 22 ends

______________________

Water Quality/Water Service

92. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an updated Will Serve Letter from Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 to the Planning Department indicating the ability of the property to receive adequate water service.

93. Prior to final inspection (or project sign-off, as applicable) by the Planning Department, the applicant shall demonstrate that all requirements of Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 have been met, including installation of a meter, if applicable.

94. A USC approved backflow device is required for this property and is to be installed and maintained by the property owner.

Deed Restrictions

95. The property owner is required to execute and record a deed restriction which shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs and expenses of liability arising out of the acquisition, design, construction, operation, maintenance, existence or failure of the permitted project in an area where an extraordinary potential for damage or destruction from wildfire exists as an inherent risk to life and property. The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to Planning department staff prior to final planning approval.

96. Prior to final Planning Department approval, the applicant shall be required to execute and record a deed restriction reflecting lighting requirements set forth in Condition Nos. 14-20.

The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to the Planning Department prior to final Planning Department approval.

97. The garage area shall be limited to accessory use as defined by the City of Malibu LCP. The garage area cannot be converted into habitable space at any time in the future. Prior to issuance of building permits, the application is required to execute and record a deed restriction to this effect.

Prior to Occupancy

98. Prior to, or at the time of a Planning final inspection, the property owner / applicant shall submit to the Planning Department the plumbing permit for the irrigation system installation signed off by the Building Safety Division.

Page 21 of 22 ends

______________________
Department. Applicant must provide haul tickets and diversion information. The final Summary Report shall designate the specific materials that were land filled or recycled and state the facilities where all materials were taken.
101. The applicant shall request a final Planning Department inspection prior to final inspection by the City of Malibu Building Safety Division. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until the Planning Department has determined that the project complies with this coastal development permit. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be granted at the discretion of the Planning Director, provided adequate security has been deposited with the City to ensure compliance should the final work not be completed in accordance with this permit.
102. Any construction trailer, storage equipment or similar temporary equipment not permitted as part of the approved scope of work shall be removed prior to final inspection and approval, and if applicable, the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

Fixed Conditions
103. This coastal development permit shall run with the land and bind all future owners of the property.
104. Violation of any of the conditions of this approval may be cause for revocation of this permit and termination of all rights granted there under.

SECTION 6. The Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2025. __________________________________
DENNIS R. SMITH, Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________________
REBECCA EVANS, Recording Secretary
LOCAL APPEAL - Pursuant to Local Coastal Program Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Section

Page 22 of 22 ends

______________________
form and filing fee, as specified by the City Council. Appeal forms may be found online at www.malibucity.org, in person at City Hall, or by calling (310) 456-2489, ext. 246.

Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 1.12.010 of the MMC and Code of Civil Procedure. Any person wishing to challenge the above action in Superior Court may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Malibu at or prior to the public hearing.

I CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION NO. 25-03 was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Malibu at the Regular meeting held on the 18th day of February 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________________
REBECCA EVANS, Recording Secretary
DRAFT 128
Allison Cook <[email protected]>
Applicant's Request for Continuance of Item 4.A. on Tonight's Planning Commission Agenda (29329 Heathercliff Rd.)
1 message
Chris Deleau <[email protected]> Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 2:49 PM To: Allison Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Alan ACS <[email protected]>, Don Schmitz <[email protected]>, Scott Hoeft <[email protected]>, AK Munaim <[email protected]>, Erin Schrang <[email protected]>
Allison, please accept this as the applicant’s formal request for a hearing continuance. We are requesting additional time to respond to multiple letters and email correspondence received on Friday and today, as well as the videos received from the public.

Additionally, our client fell and hurt his back very badly. He cannot move and is bedridden. He very much wants to attend the hearing.

Thanks,
Chris Deleau, JD, AICP
Special Projects Manager, Schmitz and Associates
747.494.7293
schmitzandassociates.com
[email protected]
28230 Agoura Rd. Suite 200, Agoura Hills, CA 91301
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof.

ATTACHMENT B
129

Page 1 of 5 ends

5 Commission Agenda Report
To: Chair Leonard and Members of the Planning Commission Prepared by: Allison Cook, AICP, Contract Planner
Approved by: Maureen Tamuri, AIA, AICP, Interim Planning Director Reviewed by: Salvador Lopez Jr., Interim Assistant Planning Director Date prepared: November 7, 2024 Meeting date: November 18, 2024 Subject: Coastal Development Permit No. 20-003 and Minor Modification No. 20-001 – An application for a new two-story single-family residence and associated development (Continued from October 7, 2024) Location: 29329 Heathercliff Road, not within the appealable coastal zone
APN: 4468-011-011
Owner: ACS International, LLC
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-64 (Exhibit A) determining the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, and approving Coastal Development Permit No. 20-003 to construct a new 4,050 square-foot, two-story, single-family residence with an attached 390 square-foot garage, swimming pool, landscaping, hardscape, retaining walls, grading, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system; including Minor Modification No. 20-001 for up to a 50 percent reduction in the front yard setback, located in the Rural Residential, One-Acre Zoning District at 29329 Heathercliff Road (ACS International, LLC) DISCUSSION: The subject item was scheduled for the October 7, 2024, Planning Commission hearing. Prior to the meeting, the applicant submitted a written request that the item be continued to provide the applicant with additional time to respond to public comments (Exhibit B). At its meeting on October 7, 2024, the Planning Commission continued the item to November 18, 2024. This agenda report provides an addendum to the October 7, 2024, agenda report. The following revisions shall be applied to said report.

Planning Commission
Meeting
11-18-24
Item

4.A.

ATTACHMENT C
130

Page 2 of 5 ends

Revised Plans
On October 24, 2024, the applicant submitted an updated site slope exhibit and project plans, and a written summary of the changes (Exhibit C). Since the October 7, 2024 meeting, the applicant’s surveyor re-surveyed the topography in the area of the 200-foot contour line that crosses the proposed driveway “throat” at the entry to the hammerhead turnaround. The revised site slope exhibit shows the 200-foot contour line slightly more to the west, toward Pacific Coast Highway (PCH), than originally shown. The applicant also indicated that the prior site slope exhibit was not accurately prepared according to the required five-foot contour intervals, which had shown the colored slope bands that depict different slope steepness categories beginning and ending in between the five-foot contour intervals in some cases, as opposed to being coterminous with the contour interval lines.

Additionally, in some cases, less than the five-foot contour interval was used. The revised slope exhibit corrects these items and shows some resulting changes in slope steepness categories for various portions of the site, all of which occur in the western part of the site (toward PCH) and downslope of the proposed development area (i.e., some areas are steeper and some shallower than previously shown). However, all elements of the proposed development project would continue to occur in slopes of less than 4:1 (less than 25 percent slope).

In addition to updating the grading plan with the new topographic information, the applicant’s civil engineer also made minor adjustments to the retaining wall alignment, stairway, and landing at the southeast corner of the proposed structure near the hammerhead. The applicant provided the following two exhibits to depict the changes. The first exhibit is the former grading plan, and the second is the current, revised grading plan.

Changes occur in the areas where elevation call outs are circled. All changes are consistent with zoning and LIP standards, and the retaining walls continue to not exceed six feet in height. A portion of the retaining wall increased from three to four feet in height.

Figure 1 – Former Grading Plan
Source: Applicant’s Civil Engineer
131

Page 3 of 5 ends

Figure 2 – Current, Revised Grading Plan
Source: Applicant’s Civil Engineer
The prior project plans identified total landscaping to be 6,840 square feet, which was reflected in the Project Description section of the October 7, 2024 agenda report. The applicant has since confirmed that the total landscaping should have been identified as 5,662 square feet. In addition, the prior project plans identified total permeable surface area to be 5,275 square feet and 6,400 square feet, varying among plan sheets, which was reflected in the Project Description section and Table 3 – LCP Zoning Conformance of the October 7, 2024, report. The applicant has confirmed that the total impermeable surface area proposed should have been noted as 6,405 square feet. The total of 6,405 square feet is less than the maximum allowed 8,549 square feet and is consistent with the LIP standard for impermeable coverage. The corrected square footages are reflected in the Resolution (Exhibit A).

The Site Plan (Sheet A-0.1) and Landscape Plan set were also adjusted to account for the changes to the stairs, landing, and retaining walls on the grading plan, to ensure all plan sets across disciplines are consistent (shown in Exhibit C). As a result of the grading plan changes, the square footages of landscaped and impermeable surface areas have been reduced in the area of the changes to the stairs, landing, and retaining walls, but have been increased elsewhere on the site so that the total proposed landscape area and impermeable surface area remain 5,662 square feet and 6,405 square feet, respectively.

The Landscape Plan in Exhibit C specifically identifies where the landscape square footage has been removed and where it has been added.

Lastly, the applicant has revised the project rendering (shown on the cover sheet of the architectural plan set, Exhibit C). The earlier rendering depicted retaining walls along the 132

Page 4 of 5 ends

building elevation facing PCH, which had been removed from the design since before the prior set of plans included in the October 7, 2024, agenda report. Neither the project plans in the October 7, 2024, agenda report nor the revised project plans submitted on October 24, 2024, indicate a retaining wall along this building elevation.

The changes to the project plans are considered minor. The City’s Geotechnical reviewing consultants have reviewed the changes to the grading plan, including stairs, landing, and retaining walls, and issued a letter that finds the changes acceptable with no additional geotechnical recommendations required.

Public Correspondence
Public correspondence received after the October 7, 2024 agenda report was distributed is included as Exhibit E. The following discussion addresses concerns expressed.

Fire Access
The County Fire Department approved the project’s concept fire access plan on November 17, 2020. Final Fire Department approval of the project is required during Building Safety plan check review. The City’s standard condition of approval is for the project to comply with all requirements and conditions of the Los Angeles County Fire Department (Condition of Approval No. 33 in Exhibit A). Therefore, as is standard practice, the County Fire Department staff will be reviewing the project for consistency with fire access and other fire-related requirements once final project plans are prepared and submitted to the County as part of the City Building Safety plan check process. City staff spoke with supervising County Fire Department staff on October 10, 2024, and confirmed that the Fire Department’s concept fire access approval is still valid.

Illegal Grading
As part of concerns raised about slopes on the subject property, public comments indicated illegal grading had recently occurred on the project site. The applicant indicated that weed abatement activities took place on the project site on September 26, 2024, and confirmed that equipment used included a mechanical scraper, truck, and hand-held equipment. City Code Enforcement staff, along with Building Safety staff and Planning staff, visited the site on October 7, 2024 and observed no evidence that grading had occurred on the property.

Minor Modification
Public comments indicate that steep slopes are not considered sensitive resources in the LCP and LIP, and therefore a minor modification cannot be approved. A full discussion of the minor modification request for the front yard setback is provided in the October 7, 2024 agenda report. The front yard setback minor modification would enable the project to avoid 133

Page 5 of 5 ends

steep slopes (steeper than 4:1), which are considered sensitive resources. Chapter 4 of the LIP addresses Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA). Section 4.6.1(A) of the LIP states, “However, in the Point Dume area, new development shall be designed to avoid encroachment on slopes of 25 percent grade or steeper.” EXHIBITS:

A. Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-64
B. Applicant’s Request for Continuance
C. Revised Project Plans and Summary of Changes
D. October 7, 2024, Agenda Report
E. Public Correspondence
134

EXHIBIT A

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 24-64

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

MALIBU DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT

FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND
APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 20-003 TO
CONSTRUCT A NEW 4,050 SQUARE-FOOT, TWO-STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 390 SQUARE-FOOT GARAGE,

SWIMMING POOL, LANDSCAPING, HARDSCAPE, RETAINING WALLS,

GRADING, AND INSTALLATION OF A NEW ONSITE WASTEWATER
TREATMENT SYSTEM; INCLUDING MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 20-001 FOR UP TO A 50 PERCENT REDUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK,

LOCATED IN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL, ONE-ACRE ZONING DISTRICT AT 29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD (ACS INTERNATIONAL, LLC)
The Planning Commission of the City of Malibu does hereby find, order and resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

A. On January 9, 2020, an application for Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 20- 003 to allow for a new single-family residence and associated development was submitted to the Planning Department by ACS International, LLC. The application was routed to the City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 (WD29), and Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) for review.

B. On September 29, 2022, a Notice of Coastal Development Permit Application was posted on the subject property.

C. On December 14, 2023, the application was deemed complete for processing.

D. On March 15, 2024, Planning Department staff determined the application qualified to be processed administratively pursuant to Local Coastal Program (LCP) Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Section 13.13.1.

E. On May 24, 2024, the Planning Director approved Administrative Coastal Development Permit (ACDP) No. 20-003, inclusive of Minor Modification (MM) No. 20-001.

After considering public comments received by the Planning Director on the ACDP and prior to reporting the item to the Planning Commission, the applicant requested that the application be processed as a regular CDP.

F. On September 26, 2024, a Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

DRAFT 135
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 2 of 22 ends

______________________
G. On October 7, 2024, the project applicant submitted a written request to continue the public hearing and the Planning Commission continued the item to the November 18, 2024 Regular Planning Commission meeting.

H. On October 24, 2024, the applicant submitted revised project plans and related application materials to the Planning Department.

I. On November 18, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, reviewed and considered the staff report, reviewed and considered written reports, public testimony, and other information in the record.

SECTION 2. Environmental Review.

Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission has analyzed the proposed project. The Planning Commission found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15303(a) and (e) – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The Planning Commission has further determined that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

SECTION 3. Coastal Development Permit Findings.

Based on evidence contained within the record and pursuant to the LCP LIP, including Sections

13.7(B) and 13.9, the Planning Commission adopts the findings of fact, and approves CDP No. 20-003 for construction of a new 4,050 square-foot, 18-foot tall, two-story single-family residence with an attached 390 square-foot garage, swimming pool, landscaping, hardscape, retaining walls, grading, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), including MM No. 20-001 for up to a 50 percent reduction of the front yard setback, located in the Rural Residential–One Acre (RR-1) zoning district at 29329 Heathercliff Road.

The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the LCP’s zoning, grading, cultural resources, water quality, and wastewater treatment system standards requirements. With the inclusion of the proposed MM, the project has been determined to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals, and policies. The required findings are made herein.

A. General Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)

1. The project is located in the RR-1 residential zoning district, an area designated for residential uses, including single-family residences. The project has been reviewed for conformance with the LCP by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, City geotechnical staff, WD29, and the LACFD.

As discussed herein, based on submitted reports, project plans, visual analysis and site investigation, the proposed project, as conditioned, conforms to the LCP in that it meets all DRAFT 136
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 3 of 22 ends

______________________
applicable residential development standards, including the size, height, and location requirements of the LCP, inclusive of the requested MM.

2. Evidence in the record, including detailed alternatives analysis provided in the agenda report, demonstrates that as conditioned, the project meets the development policies of the LCP, does not result in adverse impacts on coastal resources and has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative.

B. Minor Modification Findings for Front Yard Setback (LIP Section 13.27)

1. The project proposes a 49.8 percent reduction in the required front yard setback, from the minimum required 59.4 feet to 29.6 feet. The reduced front yard setback will avoid development on slopes 4 to 1 and steeper, considered sensitive resources. By siting the development in the easterly and flatter area of the property, the remainder of the site is retained as natural open space and provides a buffer from the residence to the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH), a scenic road. Natural vegetation on the westerly portion of the site is also retained. The residence would be sited near neighboring residences, continuing the development pattern of houses upslope of PCH and close to Heathercliff Road.

2. The project’s height and bulk will not adversely affect neighborhood character. The proposed structure complies with the size, height, location, grading and residential development standards of the LCP and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC), consistent with the RR-1 zoning designation, with the inclusion of the MM request. The project is compatible with other development in the adjacent area in that the neighborhood is characterized by one- and two-story residences with similar residence placement near or at the top of the hillside and orientation parallel to PCH. Based on conformance with development standards, inclusive of the MM, project conditions for building, driveway, wall materials and colors, the particular proposed site and building design characteristics, the surrounding topography, and surrounding existing development, the project is not expected to have an adverse effect on neighborhood character.

3. The project will comply with all applicable requirements of State and local law, and is conditioned to comply with any relevant approvals, permits, and licenses from the City of Malibu, including those of the City Biologist, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, City Environmental Health Administrator, WD29 and the LACFD. The project must also be approved by the WD29 and the City of Malibu Building Safety/Environmental Sustainability Department prior to issuance of City building permits.

C. Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection (LIP Chapter 6)

1. The residential structure will not adversely affect views from PCH, a scenic road.

The project meets the required development standards of the MMC and LIP, including size, height and location, inclusive of the MM for front yard setback. The residential structure will be located on the flatter portion of the site, upslope from PCH, and adjacent to other residences along Heathercliff Road, leaving the southern portion of the site along the scenic road as open space with natural habitat and serving as a visual buffer from the development. The residential structure is DRAFT 137
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 4 of 22 ends

______________________
expected to be only minimally visible from the Zuma Ridge Trail located across PCH and upslope from the project site. The residence will be stepped into the hillside. The project’s retaining walls are not directly visible from PCH. Nonetheless, the project has been conditioned so that the final design of the retaining walls includes veneers, textures and colors to blend with the surrounding earth materials and landscaping. Standard conditions of approval have been included for building and pavement colors, materials, and lighting. Therefore, the project, as proposed and conditioned, will not have significant adverse scenic or visual impacts upon scenic roads and public viewing areas.

2. The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect scenic and visual resources and no feasible alternatives will avoid or substantially lessen significant adverse impacts on scenic and visual resources. The structures will be sited on the flatter portion of the site furthest from the PCH, leaving most of the site and natural scrub vegetation preserved as a buffer between the development and the PCH. A condition of approval has been added to ensure retaining walls are treated to blend in with the surrounding natural environment. The project has also been conditioned to include limitations on exterior lighting and colors of exterior finishes used to prevent any visual impacts to scenic areas. Shifting the proposed structure westerly on the site and downhill toward the PCH may reduce the obstruction of views from neighbors’ properties, although it is not expected to completely remove the view obstruction. Moving the structure downslope would result in development of steep slopes (steeper than 4 to 1) that are considered sensitive resources and natural scrub vegetation, as well as place the structure nearer to PCH, which is uncharacteristic of the pattern of development in the area that is closer to the top of the hill.

D. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)

1. The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, City geotechnical review consultants, WD29, and the LACFD. These specialists determined that the project, with conditions, would not result in adverse geologic or flood impacts. The project is not located in a hazard zone, except that the site is within an extreme fire hazard area, and groundwater is not expected to be encountered during construction. Any special conditions from these departments regarding site stability must be met prior to issuance of a building permit; any special conditions from the City Building Safety Department and the LACFD regarding structural integrity must be met prior to issuance of a building permit.

Therefore, no feasible alternatives to the proposed development that would avoid or substantially lessen impacts on site stability or structural integrity are required nor available.

2. The entire City of Malibu is designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.

The property is currently subject to wildfire, however, development of a residence and associated development on the subject property will not increase the site’s susceptibility to wildfire. The proposed development may actually decrease the site’s susceptibility to wildfire through compliance with fuel modification requirements and the use of appropriate building materials which will be utilized during construction. The City is served by the LACFD, as well as the California Department of Forestry, if needed. In the event of major fires, the County has “mutual DRAFT 138
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 5 of 22 ends

______________________
aid agreements” with cities and counties throughout the State so that additional personnel and firefighting equipment can augment the LACFD. Conditions of approval have been included to require compliance with all LACFD development standards. As such, the proposed project, as designed, constructed, and conditioned, will not be subject to nor increase the instability of the site or structural integrity involving wildfire hazards.

3. The project site is not in a liquefaction, landslide or Alquist Priolo Earthquake Zone.

Groundwater is not expected to be encountered during construction. The project plans and associated technical reports have been reviewed by City geotechnical review consultants, the LACFD, the City Public Works Department, and the City Environmental Health Administrator.

These specialists determined that the project, with conditions, would not result in adverse geologic or flood impacts. It has been determined that the project is not located in a hazard zone, except that the project site is located within an extreme fire hazard area.

SECTION 4. Planning Commission Action.

Based on the foregoing findings and evidence contained within the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves CDP No. 20-003 and MM No. 20-001, subject to the following conditions.

SECTION 5. Conditions of Approval.

Standard Conditions

1. The property owners, and their successors in interest, shall indemnify and defend the City of Malibu and its officers, employees and agents from and against all liability and costs relating to the City's actions concerning this project, including (without limitation) any award of litigation expenses in favor of any person or entity who seeks to challenge the validity of any of the City's actions or decisions in connection with this project. The City shall have the sole right to choose its counsel and property owners shall reimburse the City’s expenses incurred in its defense of any lawsuit challenging the City’s actions concerning this project.

2. Approval of this application is to allow for the project described herein. The scope of work approved is as follows:
a. A new 4,050 square-foot, 18 foot-tall, two-story, single-family residence, an attached 320 square-foot roof overhang, and an attached 390 square foot garage; b. 6,405 square feet of impermeable surface coverage;
c. Retaining walls not to exceed six feet in height;
d. Swimming pool and associated pool equipment;
e. Patios, decks and paving for vehicle and pedestrian access and a fire department turnaround area;
f. Trellis over deck;
g. OWTS;
DRAFT 139
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 6 of 22 ends

______________________
h. 5,662 square feet of landscaping; and
i. Non-exempt grading of 675 cubic yards.

3. Except as specifically changed by conditions of approval, the proposed development shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the approved scope of work, as described in Condition 2 and depicted on plans on file with the Planning Department dated October 24, 2024. The proposed development shall further comply with all conditions of approval stipulated in this resolution and Department Review Sheets attached hereto. In the event project plans conflict with any condition of approval, the condition shall take precedence.

4. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.18.2, this permit and rights conferred in this approval shall not be effective until the property owner signs and returns the Acceptance of Conditions Affidavit accepting the conditions set forth herein. The applicant shall file this form with the Planning Department within 10 days of this decision and/or prior to issuance of any development permits.

5. The applicant shall digitally submit a complete set of plans to the Planning Department for consistency review and approval prior to plan check and again prior to the issuance of any building or development permits.

6. The CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three (3) years after issuance of the permit unless a time extension has been granted. Extension of the permit may be granted by the approving authority for due cause. Extensions shall be requested in writing by the applicant or authorized agent prior to expiration of the three-year period and shall set forth the reasons for the request. In the event of an appeal, the CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three years from the date the appeal is decided by the decision-making body or withdrawn by the appellant.

7. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition of approval will be resolved by the Planning Director upon written request of such interpretation.

8. All development shall conform to requirements of the City of Malibu Environmental Sustainability Department, City Biologist, City Coastal Engineer, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, WD29 and LACFD, as applicable. Notwithstanding this review, all required permits shall be secured.

9. Minor changes to the approved plans or the conditions of approval may be approved by the Planning Director, provided such changes achieve substantially the same results and the project is still in compliance with the MMC and the LCP. Revised plans reflecting the minor changes and additional fees shall be required.

10. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.20, development pursuant to an approved CDP shall not commence until the CDP is effective. The CDP is not effective until all appeals have been exhausted.

DRAFT 140
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 7 of 22 ends

______________________

11. The property owner must submit payment for any outstanding fees payable to the City prior to issuance of any building permit, including grading or demolition.

Cultural Resources

12. In the event that potentially important cultural resources are found in the course of geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease until a qualified archaeologist can provide an evaluation of the nature and significance of the resources and until the Planning Director can review this information. Thereafter, the procedures contained in LIP Chapter 11 and those in MMC Section 17.54.040(D)(4)(b) shall be followed.

13. If human bone is discovered during geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease and the procedures described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code shall be followed. Section 7050.5 requires notification of the coroner. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, the applicant shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission by phone within 24 hours. Following notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, the procedures described in Section 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code shall be followed.

Lighting

14. No outdoor lighting is approved as part of this project. A lighting plan shall be submitted for City approval prior to Building Safety plan check, consistent with City standards, and the following: Exterior lighting must comply with the Dark Sky Ordinance and shall be minimized, shielded, or concealed and restricted to low intensity features, so that no light source is directly visible from public view. Permitted lighting shall conform to the following standards:
a. Lighting for walkways shall be limited to fixtures that do not exceed two feet in height and are directed downward, and limited to 850 lumens (equivalent to a 60- watt incandescent bulb);
b. Security lighting controlled by motion detectors may be attached to the residence provided it is directed downward and is limited to 850 lumens; c. Driveway lighting shall be limited to the minimum lighting necessary for safe vehicular use. The lighting shall be limited to 850 lumens; d. Lights at entrances as required by the Building Code shall be permitted provided that such lighting does not exceed 850 lumens;
e. Site perimeter lighting shall be prohibited; and
f. Outdoor decorative lighting for aesthetic purposes is prohibited.

15. Night lighting for sports courts or other private recreational facilities shall be prohibited.

DRAFT 141
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 8 of 22 ends

______________________

16. No permanently installed lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. Lighting levels on any nearby property from artificial light sources on the subject property(ies) shall not produce an illumination level greater than one foot-candle.

17. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded directed downward and inward so there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. High intensity lighting of the shore is prohibited.

18. String lights are allowed in occupied dining and entertainment areas only and must not exceed 3,000 Kelvin.

19. Motion sensor lights shall be programmed to extinguish ten minutes after activation.

20. Three violations of the conditions by the same property owner will result in a requirement to permanently remove the outdoor light fixture(s) from the site.

Fencing and Walls

21. The height of walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A). No retaining wall shall exceed six feet in height or 12 feet in height for a combination of two or more walls.

22. All necessary boundary fencing shall be of an open rail-type design with a wooden rail at the top (instead of wire), be less than 40-inches high, and have a space greater than 14- inches between the ground and the bottom post or wire. A split rail design that blends with the natural environment is preferred.

Construction/Framing

23. Prior to the commencement of work, the applicant shall submit a copy of the Construction Management Plan to the Planning Department. The Construction Management Plan shall include a dedicated parking location for construction workers and storage of construction material, not within the public right of way. Prior to permit issuance, the Construction Management Plan must be acceptable to the Planning Director, and, if applicable, to the Building Official and Public Works Director.

24. A construction staging plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to plan check submittal.

25. Construction hours shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. No construction activities shall be permitted on Sundays or City-designated holidays.

26. Construction management techniques, including minimizing the amount of equipment used simultaneously and increasing the distance between emission sources, shall be employed as feasible and appropriate. All trucks leaving the construction site shall adhere to the DRAFT 142
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 9 of 22 ends

______________________
California Vehicle Code. In addition, construction vehicles shall be covered when necessary and their tires rinsed prior to leaving the property.

27. All new development, including construction, grading, and landscaping shall be designed to incorporate drainage and erosion control measures prepared by a licensed engineer that incorporate structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control the volume, velocity and pollutant load of stormwater runoff in compliance with all requirements contained in LIP Chapter 17, including:
a. Construction shall be phased to the extent feasible and practical to limit the amount of disturbed areas present at a given time.
b. Grading activities shall be planned during the southern California dry season (April through October).
c. During construction, contractors shall be required to utilize sandbags and berms to control runoff during on-site watering and periods of rain in order to minimize surface water contamination.
d. Filter fences designed to intercept and detain sediment while decreasing the velocity of runoff shall be employed within the project site.

28. When framing is complete, a site survey shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer or architect that states the finished ground level elevation and the highest roof member elevation. Prior to the commencement of further construction activities, said document shall be submitted to the assigned Building Inspector and Planning Department for review and sign off on framing.

29. For the transportation of heavy construction equipment and/or material, which requires the use of oversized-transport vehicles on State highways, the applicant / property owner is required to obtain a transportation permit from the California Department of Transportation.

Colors and Materials

Page 10 of 22 ends

______________________
walls shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and clearly indicated on all grading, improvement and/or building plans.

Fuel Modification

32. Prior to the issuance of final building permits, the project shall receive LACFD approval of a Final Fuel Modification Plan.

Site Specific Conditions

33. The project shall comply with all requirements and conditions of the LACFD.

Biology/Landscaping

35. Prior to installation of any landscaping, the applicant shall obtain a plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division.

37. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City of Malibu, are prohibited.

38. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to significantly obstruct the primary view from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth).

39. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote or copper arsenate.

40. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.

DRAFT 144
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 11 of 22 ends

______________________

41. No development is permitted on slopes steeper than 4 to 1.

42. Prior to a final plan check approval, the property owner /applicant must provide a landscape water use approval from the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29.

47. The landscape and fuel modification plan has been conditioned to protect natural resources in accordance with the LCP. All areas shall be planted and maintained as described in the landscape and fuel modification plan. Failure to comply with the landscape conditions is a violation of the conditions of approval for this project.

DRAFT 145
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 12 of 22 ends

______________________

51. Grading/excavation/vegetation removal scheduled between February 1 – September 15 will require bird nesting surveys by a qualified biologist prior to initiation of such activities.

Public Works – Grading and Drainage

55. The applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department prior to the commencement of any work within the public right-of-way. The driveway shall be constructed of either six inches of concrete over four inches of aggregate base, or four inches of asphalt concrete over six inches of aggregate base. The driveway shall be flush with the existing grades with no curbs.

Page 13 of 22 ends

______________________
Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4:1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading operations before the rainy season. If grading operations are not completed before the rainy season begins, grading shall be halted and temporary erosion control measures shall be put into place to minimize erosion until grading resumes after March 31, unless the City determines that completion of grading would be more protective of resources.

59. A grading and drainage plan shall be approved containing the following information prior to the issuance of grading permits for the project.
a. Public Works Department general notes;
b. The existing and proposed square footage of impervious coverage on the property shall be shown on the grading plan (including separate areas for buildings, driveways, walkways, parking, tennis courts and pool decks); c. The limits of land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated on the grading plan and a total area shall be shown on the plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits of grading, areas disturbed for the installation of the septic system, and areas disturbed for the installation of the detention system shall be included within the area delineated;
d. The grading limits shall include the temporary cuts made for retaining walls, e. buttresses, and over excavations for fill slopes and shall be shown on the grading f. plan;
g. If the property contains trees that are to be protected, they shall be highlighted on the grading plan;
h. If the property contains rare and endangered species as identified in the resources study the grading plan shall contain a prominent note identifying the areas to be protected (to be left undisturbed). Fencing of these areas shall be delineated on the grading plan if required by the City Biologist;
i. Private storm drain systems shall be shown on the grading plan. Systems greater j. than 12-inch diameter shall also have a plan and profile for the system included with the grading plan; and
k. Public storm drain modifications shown on the grading plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit.

DRAFT 147
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 14 of 22 ends

______________________

61. The non-exempt grading for the project shall not exceed a total of 675 cubic yards, cut and fill.

62. The total grading yardage verification certificate shall be copied onto the coversheet of the Grading Plan. No alternative formats or substitutes will be accepted.

Public Works – Storm Water

Page 15 of 22 ends

______________________
f. Methods of onsite percolation, site re-vegetation and an analysis for off-site project impacts;
g. Measures to treat and infiltrate runoff from impervious areas; h. A copy of the WQMP shall be filed against the property to provide constructive notice to future property owners of their obligation to maintain the water quality measure installed during construction prior to the issuance of grading or building permits; and
i. The WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and the fee applicable at the time of submittal for review of the WQMP shall be paid prior to the start of the technical review. The WQMP shall be approved prior the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading and drainage plan and/or building plans. The Public Works Department will tentatively approve the plan and will keep a copy until the completion of the project. Once the project is completed, the applicant shall verify the installation of the BMP’s, make any revisions to the WQMP, and resubmit to the Public Works Department for approval. The original signed and notarized document shall be recorded with the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. A certified copy of the WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

DRAFT 149
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 16 of 22 ends

______________________
Geology

Swimming Pool/Spa/Water Feature

69. Onsite noise, including that which emanates from swimming pool and air conditioning equipment, shall be limited as described in MMC Chapter 8.24 (Noise).

70. Pool and air conditioning equipment that will be installed shall be screened from view by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section

3.5.3(A).

71. All swimming pools shall contain double walled construction with drains and leak detection systems capable of sensing a leak of the inner wall.

72. The discharge of swimming pool, spa and decorative fountain water and filter backwash, including water containing bacteria, detergents, wastes, algaecides, or other chemicals is prohibited. Swimming pool, spa, and decorative fountain water may be used as landscape irrigation only if the following items are met:
a. The discharge water is dechlorinated, debrominated or if the water is disinfected using ozonation;
b. There are sufficient BMPs in place to prevent soil erosion; and c. The discharge does not reach into the MS4 or to the ASBS (including tributaries)

73. Discharges not meeting the above-mentioned methods must be trucked to a Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Works.

75. Pursuant to MMC Section 9.20.040(B), all ponds, decorative fountains shall require a water recirculating/recycling system.

DRAFT 150
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 17 of 22 ends

______________________
Environmental Health/OWTS

77. Final OWTS Plot Plan: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a final OWTS plot plan prepared by a City Registered OWTS Designer shall be submitted showing an OWTS design meeting the minimum requirements of the MMC and the LCP, including necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property and the proposed landscape plan for the developed property. The OWTS plot plan shall show essential features of the OWTS and must fit onto an 11 inch by 17 inch sheet leaving a five inch margin clear to provide space for a City applied legend. If the scale of the plans is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details and/or all necessary setbacks, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inches by 22 inches).

79. All plans and reports must be signed by a City registered OWTS Designer, and the plans stamped by the project Geologist, Coastal Engineer, and Structural Engineer as applicable. The final OWTS design report and construction drawings shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator with the designer’s signature, professional registration number, and stamp (if applicable).

Page 18 of 22 ends

______________________
textile filter ultraviolet disinfection, etc.); major components, manufacturers, and model numbers for "package" systems; and conceptual design for custom engineered systems.
f. Specifications, supporting geology information, and percolation test results for the subsurface effluent dispersal portion of the onsite wastewater disposal system. This must include the proposed type of effluent dispersal system (drainfield, trench, seepage pit subsurface drip, etc.) as well as the system’s geometric dimensions and basic construction features. Supporting calculations shall be presented that relate the results of soils analysis or percolation/infiltration tests to the projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate, including any unit conversions or safety factors. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the effluent dispersal system shall be specified in the final design. The projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate shall be reported in units of total gallons per day and gallons per square foot per day. Specifications for the subsurface effluent dispersal system shall be shown to accommodate the design hydraulic loading rate (i.e., average and peak OWTS effluent flow, reported in units of gallons per day). The subsurface effluent dispersal system design must take into account the number of bedrooms, fixture units and building occupancy characteristics.
g. All OWTS design drawings shall be submitted with the wet signature and typed name of the OWTS designer. If the scale of the plan is such that more space than is available on the 11” x 17” plot plan is needed to clearly show construction details, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inch by 22 inch, for review by Environmental Health). Note: For OWTS final designs, full-size plans are required for review by Building Safety Division and the Planning Department.

The final floor plans must show all bedrooms and drainage fixtures in the proposed residence.

82. Proof of Ownership: Proof of ownership of subject property shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator.

83. Operations and Maintenance Manual: An operations and maintenance manual specified by the OWTS designer shall be submitted to the property owner and maintenance provider of the proposed OWTS.

Page 19 of 22 ends

______________________
Angeles County Recorder. Said covenant shall serve as constructive notice to any future purchaser for value that the onsite wastewater treatment system serving the subject property is an advanced method of sewage disposal pursuant to the City of Malibu Municipal Code. Said covenant shall be provided by the City of Environmental Health Administrator.

86. Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant Approval: Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

87. City of Malibu Public Works Approval: City of Malibu Public Works final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

88. City of Malibu Geologist/Geotechnical Approval: City of Malibu consulting geotechnical reviewers' final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

89. City of Malibu Planning Approval: City of Malibu Planning Department final approval of the OWTS plan shall be obtained.

Water Quality/Water Service

94. A USC approved backflow device is required for this property and is to be installed and maintained by the property owner.

DRAFT 153
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 20 of 22 ends

______________________
Deed Restrictions

96. Prior to final Planning Department approval, the applicant shall be required to execute and record a deed restriction reflecting lighting requirements set forth in Condition Nos. 14-20.

The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to the Planning Department prior to final Planning Department approval.

Prior to Occupancy

99. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the City Biologist shall inspect the project site and determine that all Planning Department conditions to protect natural resources are in compliance with the approved plans.
100. Prior to a final Building inspection, the applicant shall provide a Recycling Summary Report (Summary Report) and obtain the approval from the Environmental Sustainability Department. Applicant must provide haul tickets and diversion information. The final Summary Report shall designate the specific materials that were land filled or recycled and state the facilities where all materials were taken.
101. The applicant shall request a final Planning Department inspection prior to final inspection by the City of Malibu Building Safety Division. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until the Planning Department has determined that the project complies with this coastal development permit. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be granted at the discretion of the Planning Director, provided adequate security has been deposited with the City to ensure compliance should the final work not be completed in accordance with this permit.

DRAFT 154
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 21 of 22 ends

______________________
102. Any construction trailer, storage equipment or similar temporary equipment not permitted as part of the approved scope of work shall be removed prior to final inspection and approval, and if applicable, the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

Fixed Conditions
103. This coastal development permit amendment shall run with the land and bind all future owners of the property.
104. Violation of any of the conditions of this approval may be cause for revocation of this permit and termination of all rights granted there under.

SECTION 6. The Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November 2024. __________________________________
DREW LEONARD, Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________________
REBECCA EVANS, Recording Secretary
LOCAL APPEAL - Pursuant to Local Coastal Program Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Section

13.20.1 (Local Appeals) a decision made by the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by an aggrieved person by written statement setting forth the grounds for appeal. An appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within 10 days and shall be accompanied by an appeal form and filing fee, as specified by the City Council. Appeal forms may be found online at www.malibucity.org, in person at City Hall, or by calling (310) 456-2489, ext. 246.

DRAFT 155
Resolution No. 24-64

Page 22 of 22 ends

______________________
I CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION NO. 24-64 was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Malibu at the Regular meeting held on the 18th day of November 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________________
REBECCA EVANS, Recording Secretary
DRAFT 156
Allison Cook <[email protected]>
RE: FW: 29329 Heathercliff Rd / CDP 20-003 Public Hearing - October 7, 2024 1 message
Don Schmitz <[email protected]> Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:08 AM To: Allison Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Diana Springer <[email protected]>, Erin Schrang <[email protected]>, Chris Deleau <[email protected]>, Scott Hoeft <[email protected]>, AK Munaim <[email protected]>, Alan ACS <[email protected]>, Don Schmitz <[email protected]>, Patricia Salazar <[email protected]> Good morning Allison;
Considering all the last-minute objections being raised by the neighbors, including a letter from their attorney within the hour, we are going to postpone our application from tonight’s hearing so that we can produce a supplemental packet addressing all the issues. Hopefully, this will not unduly delay the hearing of the matter.

We very much appreciate your professionalism and steady hand on the handling of our application.

Don Schmitz, AICP
President, Schmitz and Associates
818.338.3636
310.617.0773
schmitzandassociates.com
[email protected]
28230 Agoura Rd. Suite 200, Agoura Hills, CA 91301
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof.

EXHIBIT B
157
From: Allison Cook <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 10:55 AM
To: Alan ACS <[email protected]>; AK Munaim <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: FW: 29329 Heathercliff Rd / CDP 20-003 Public Hearing - October 7, 2024 Hi - FYI.

Allison Cook, AICP
Owner, Capstone City Planning
Contract Planner to the City of Malibu
805-415-1991
[email protected]
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Justin R. Trujillo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 10:30 AM
Subject: FW: 29329 Heathercliff Rd / CDP 20-003 Public Hearing - October 7, 2024 To: Allison Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, Kenneth A. Ehrlich <[email protected]>
Allison:

Attached please find a courtesy copy of our supplemental letter opposing the 29329 Heathercliff Rd. project.

Please contact my office with any questions.

Thanks,
Justin R. Trujillo
[email protected]
Direct Dial: (310) 746-4446 | Fax: (310) 746-4499
Elkins Kalt Weintraub Reuben Gartside LLP
10345 W. Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles CA 90064
www.elkinskalt.com
158
From: Justin R. Trujillo
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2024 11:09 AM
To: [email protected]; malibu planning <[email protected]> Cc: Kenneth A. Ehrlich <[email protected]>; Gail Duncan <[email protected]> Subject: 29329 Heathercliff Rd / CDP 20-003 Public Hearing - October 7, 2024 Chair Leonard, Interim Director Tamuri, and Members of the Planning Commission:

Attached please find correspondence regarding the above-referenced matter.

Please contact my office with any questions.

Thanks,
Justin R. Trujillo
[email protected]
Direct Dial: (310) 746-4446 | Fax: (310) 746-4499 | Download VCard Elkins Kalt Weintraub Reuben Gartside LLP
10345 W. Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90064
www.elkinskalt.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be attorney-client privileged. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or attachments without proper authorization is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Elkins Kalt Weintraub Reuben Gartside LLP immediately by telephone or by e-mail, and permanently delete the original, and destroy all copies, of this message and all attachments. 159
Schmitz & Associates, Inc.
28230 Agoura Road, Suite 100
Agoura Hills, CA 91301
October 23rd, 2024
Attn: Allison Cook
Planning Department
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Cc: Raneika Brooks, Senior Planner
Hello Allison,
The project architect has confirmed that the area calculations shown on the most recent plans are correct and the area calculations and plans are consistent. The architectural site plan has been revised to match the Civil Plan in terms of impermeable coverage.

I. Plan Revision Summary: We provide you below with a summary of the physical plan changes, which are as follows:

1. Changes to Civil Plans: The small changes you noted in the civil plan were made to allow the Fire Department footpath access (hose pull) to work. Mo, the applicant’s civil engineer, noticed that the stairway along the west side of the house, leading up to the hammerhead area, did not match the elevation of the hammerhead/driveway. He modified the stairs and landing configuration so that the stairs and landings were able to reach the appropriate driveway elevation to allow for Fire Department access. This required adding some stairs and landings and slightly reconfiguring the retaining walls adjacent to the hammerhead to accommodate Fire Department access. He worked backwards from the hammerhead towards the house resulting in minor changes to the stair, wall, and landing configuration (as shown in the Attached Civil Plan Changes Exhibit).

2. Changes to Architectural Plans: On the cover sheet of the architectural set, we have modified the rear elevation rendering so that it’s more accurate. The rendering was previously showing a long variable height retaining wall elevating the rear deck above grade some three or four feet. If you look at the Civil Plans, there is no retaining wall there. The deck sits on grade completely. The rendering on the cover sheet has been modified accordingly. We also modified the architectural site plan to match the updated civil site plan.

3. Change to Slope Map: Regarding the slope band map, the prior map did not use 5’ contour intervals. I believe he was using 2’ intervals. When the surveyor revised the slope map to use 5’ contour intervals to average the slopes, the locations of the slope bands changed in 160

EXHIBIT C
several places, which is to be expected. The topography didn’t change, only how the average “slope” is calculated by the software program. This results in different slope bands (graphically). Using 5’ contour intervals is standard in the City as is noted in the City’s Application submittal requirements and as per past practice (see CDP application checklist/application requirements, requiring the use of 5’ contour intervals for the slope map).

4. Changes to the Landscaping Plans: The landscape area calculations are correct. With the minor changes to the Civil and Landscaping plans, an equal amount of landscaping was added and subtracted, therefore, the total amount of landscaped area before and after was “netted out” and remains unchanged (see SheetL-1.0, illustrated in green is 260 sq ft + 5 sq ft = 265 sq ft added and the red dashed area is 265 sq ft removed).

Further, the impervious quantity is correct with the change equal amounts of impervious area were added and subtracted; thus, the total amount of impervious area remains unchanged.

5. The revised geotechnical letter you requested indicates that no changes have occurred that would result in different recommendations from the Geotechnical Engineer.

6. Lastly, you will recall that the neighbor’s surveyor/ civil engineer (Peak Survey & Engineering) raised the issue of some small discrepancies in the area of the 200’ contour interval, as between prior surveys. To address this issue, we had the project surveyor come out to the property and survey the area near the driveway and hammerhead to verify the topography in this area. The updated survey varies only in very minor respects from the old topo maps. We also updated the slope map (and all other revised plans) based upon the most recent survey, and the map confirms that there is still no development being proposed on slopes steeper than 4:1.

The attached exhibits show the areas of change to the civil plan. The architectural and civil site plans have been modified to reflect the changes summarized above. The landscaping plan was also modified to match the Civil site plan so that all 3 plans are consistent. Attached you will find two exhibits detailing the changes to the plans and providing context for why the changes were made.

The changes, while they may have been a bit confusing, are very minor. Notwithstanding the lengthy explanation above, all that changed was the FD access walkway and the addition (relocation) of landscape area above the driveway.

All updated plans are attached hereto as are the two exhibits. There is no change to the photo simulation from PCH as the relocation of the stairs is not visible from PCH in this perspective.

We are also submitting the materials referenced through the City’s Development Portal formally. 161
II. Violation Asserted by the Neighbor:

One of the concerns raised by the neighbors was that there had been “illegal grading” in violation of City codes. After receiving this comment, we arranged a meeting with representatives of the City’s Building Safety, Code Enforcement and Planning Staff. At this site visit, it was determined by the City Building Official, Ryan Cerny, that no grading had occurred, only routine maintenance of the existing road. No violation has occurred.

Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best Regards,
Schmitz & Associates, Inc.

Christopher M. Deleau, JD, AICP
Special Projects Manager
162
191.00 F.F C
F 178.50 FS
F C
178.50 TW
0' RET.
199.35 TP
5' RET.
194.00 TW
3' RET.
185.50 TW
5' RET. 2%
2%
193.00 FS 2' RET.
189.50 FS
194.00 TW

0.5' RET.
189.50 TW

3.0' RET.
185
180
180.00 FS
1 DRAIN PIPE
2%
B.V.C.

E.V.C. F 5' RET. 201
200
198
196

PREVIOUS CIVIL PLANS CHANGED AREA

HIGHLIGHTED

CURRENT ADJUSTED CIVIL PLANS CHANGED
AREA HIGHLIGHTED 11-010 191.00 F.F. C 178.50 FS
F C
178.50 TW
0' RET.
199.30 TP
5' RET.
185.50 TW
5' RET. 2%
2%
193.00 FS 2' RET.
189.75 FS
194.20 TW
3' RET.
189.75 TW

3.0' RET.
185
180
179.50 FS 1.

DRAIN PIPE
2%
B.V.C.

E.V.C. F 5' RET.
200
198
196 2' RET.
2% 201
198.66 TW
4' RET.
198.66 FS 194.20 FS
197.40 FS
civil engineer, noticed that the stairway along the west side of the house, HIGHLIGHTED below in yellow leading up to the hammerhead area, did not match the elevation of the hammerhead/driveway, He modified the stair and landing configuration so that the stairs and landings were able to reach the appropriate driveway elevation. This required adding some stairs and landings and slightly reconfiguring the retaining walls adjacent to the hammerhead to accommodate Fire Department access. He worked backwards from the hammerhead towards the house resulting in minor changes to the stair, wall, and landing configuration (as shown in the exhibits below).

CHANGES TO CIVIL PLAN AND
EXPLANATION :
163
DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC. 2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202 SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
164
A
-
0 .
1 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: dav di [email protected]

SITEPLAN
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
1 6
"
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 296.63'
281.18'
1 2
5 .
0 0
'
1 35
.00'

44.6'
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
1 9
5 1
9 0
1 8
51 8
0 1
7 5
1 7
016
516
0 1
5 515
0 1
4 5
1 4
013
513
01 2
512
0 D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
D
E
C
K
A
T
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
E
L
1 9
0 '
E
L
1 9
1 .
5 '
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
T
O
T
A
L
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
(
>
6 '
-
0 "
)
T
O
T
A
L
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
(
>
6 '
-
0 "
)
G
A
R
A
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
F
L
O
O
R
A
R
E
A
T
O
T
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
S
Q
U
A
R
E
F
O
O
T
A
G
E
2 ,
5 9
0 S
F
1 ,
4 6
0 S
F
4 ,
0 5
0 S
F
3 2
0 S
F
3 2
0 S
F
3 9
0 S
F
4 ,
7 6
0 S
F
A
C
S
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
L
L
C
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
O
W
N
E
R
2 9
3 2
9 H
E
A
T
H
E
R
C
L
I
F
F
R
O
A
D
M
A
L
I
B
U
,
C
A
9 0
2 6
5 P
R
O
J
E
C
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
A
P
N
4 4
6 8
-
0 1
1 -
0 1
1 N
D
E
N
O
T
E
S
F
I
R
E
T
U
R
N
-
A
R
O
U
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
R
O
O
F
R
O
O
F
>
1 8
'
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
<
2 0
"
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
>
1 8
'
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
<
2 1
.
5 "
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
R
O
O
F
A
R
E
A
T
A
B
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
4 ,
2 1
0 S
F
4 8
0 S
F
(
=
1 2
%
O
F
R
O
O
F
)
4 0
S
F
(
=
1 %
O
F
R
O
O
F
)
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
I
M
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
A
R
E
A
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
I
M
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
A
R
E
A
3 0
%
O
F
2 8
,
4 9
8 S
F
(
N
E
T
L
O
T
A
R
E
A
)
I
M
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
A
R
E
A
6 ,
4 0
S
F
8 ,
5 4
9 S
F
(
>
6 ,
4 0
0 S
F
)
1 7
.
4 '
S
I
D
EYA
R
D
S
ETBAC
K
1 1.7
'
SID
EYA
R
D
S
E
T
BA
C
K
F
R
O
N
T
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
H
A
L
B
E
A
T
L
E
A
S
T
2 0
%
O
F
T
H
E
T
O
T
A
L
D
E
P
T
H
O
F
T
H
E
L
O
T
,
O
R
6 5
"
,
W
H
I
C
H
E
V
E
R
I
S
L
E
S
S
2 0
%
X
2 9
7 =
5 9
.
2 '
W
I
T
H
M
O
D
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
-
5 9
.
2 '
/
2 =
2 9
.
6 '
R
E
A
R
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
A
T
L
E
A
S
T
1 5
%
O
F
T
H
E
L
O
T
D
E
P
T
H
O
R
1 5
'
W
H
I
C
H
E
V
E
R
I
S
G
R
E
A
T
E
R
1 5
%
X
2 9
7 =
4 4
.
6 '
S
I
D
E
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
C
U
M
U
L
A
T
I
V
E
L
Y
A
T
L
E
A
S
T
2 5
%
O
F
T
H
E
T
O
T
A
L
W
I
D
T
H
O
F
T
H
E
L
O
T
B
U
T
,
I
N
N
O
E
V
E
N
T
,
S
H
A
L
L
A
S
I
N
G
L
E
S
I
D
E
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
B
E
L
E
S
S
T
H
A
N
1 0
%
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
D
T
H
O
F
T
H
E
L
O
T
O
R
5 '
,
W
H
I
C
H
E
V
E
R
I
S
G
R
E
A
T
E
R
2 5
%
X
1 1
6 .
1 '
=
2 9
.
1 '
,
1 1
.
7 '
M
I
N
+
1 7
.
4 '
=
2 9
.
1 '
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
L
1 9
8 .
0 '
<
4 T
O
1 S
L
O
P
E
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
A
-
0 .
1 A
-
0 .
2 A
-
1 .
1 A
-
1 .
2 A
-
1 .
3 A
-
2 .
1 A
-
2 .
2 A
-
3 .
1 A
-
3 .
2 A
-
3 .
3 L
-
1 .
1 L
-
1 .
2 C
-
1 C
-
2 C
-
3 C
-
4 C
-
F
D
I
N
D
E
X
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
T
O
T
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
S
Q
U
A
R
E
F
O
O
T
A
G
E
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
R
O
O
F
P
L
A
N
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
P
L
A
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
F
I
R
E
A
C
C
E
S
S
E
X
H
I
B
I
T
S
U
R
V
E
Y
S
U
R
V
E
Y
S
L
O
P
E
B
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
1 )
M
O
D
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
F
O
R
F
R
O
N
T
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
-
R
E
D
U
C
E
F
R
O
N
T
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
T
O
2 9
.
6 '
(
S
E
E
F
R
O
N
T
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
)
D
I
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
A
C
T
I
O
N
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
S
E
E
P
A
G
E
P
I
T
4 '
D
I
A
M
4 0
'
D
E
E
P
1 0
'
C
A
P
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
F
U
T
U
R
E
S
E
E
P
A
G
E
P
I
T
4 '
D
I
A
M
5 0
'
D
E
E
P
1 9
'
C
A
PPR
O
P
O
S
E
D
2 ,
5 0
0 G
A
L
S
E
P
T
I
C
T
A
N
K
8 '
M
I
N
8 '
M
I
N
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
D
I
S
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
N
O
T
E
:

T
D
S
F
i
s
t
h
e
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
s
p
a
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
i
m
a
ry
a
n
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
i
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
n
d
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
w
a
l
l
s
,
f
i
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
s
,
v
e
rt
i
c
a
l
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
c
h
a
s
e
s
/
v
o
i
d
e
d
s
p
a
c
e
s
b
e
tw
e
e
n
w
a
l
l
s
,
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
p
a
t
i
o
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
h
a
n
g
s
w
i
t
h
a
d
e
p
t
h
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
s
i
x
f
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
e
d
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
r
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
6 0
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
e
n
c
l
o
s
e
d
b
y
w
a
l
l
s
,
a
n
d
c
r
a
w
l
s
p
a
c
e
s
w
i
t
h
a
c
e
i
l
i
n
g
h
e
i
g
h
t
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
s
i
x
fe
e
t
)
.

S
t
a
i
r
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
e
l
e
v
a
t
o
r
s
h
a
ft
s
a
r
e
c
o
u
n
t
e
d
o
n
c
e
o
n
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
f
l
o
o
r
o
n
l
y
.

LOT
W
I
DT
H
-
1 1
6 '
-
1 "
LOT DEPTH - 297'-2"
N
E
W
S
I
N
G
L
E
F
A
M
I
L
Y
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
U
P
P
E
R
L
E
V
E
L
F
F
E
L
1 8
9 .
2 5
'
L
O
W
E
R
L
E
V
E
L
F
F
E
L
1 7
9 '
P
A
T
I
O
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
'
P
A
T
I
O
E
L
1 7
8 .
5 0
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
6 .
0 0
'
R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
'
G
R
O
S
S
S
I
T
E
A
R
E
A
N
E
T
S
I
T
E
A
R
E
A
S
I
T
E
A
R
E
A
S
3 3
,
5 3
2 S
F
2 8
,
4 9
8 S
F
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
F
L
O
O
R
A
R
E
A
2 1
,
7 8
0 S
F
X
.
1 7
7 =
3 ,
8 5
5 +
1 ,
0 0
0 =
4 ,
8 5
5 S
F
2 8
,
4 9
8 S
F
(
A
R
E
A
O
F
S
I
T
E
G
R
E
A
T
E
R
T
H
A
N
1 :
1 S
L
O
P
E
)
-
2 1
,
7 8
0 S
F
=
6 ,
7 1
8 S
F
X
.
1 0
=
6 7
2 S
F
4 ,
8 5
5 S
F
+
6 7
2 S
F
=
5 ,
5 2
7 S
F
(
<
5 ,
5 2
7 S
F
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
)
OCT 15, 2024
8'-6" 7'-6"
1 8
'
-
0 "
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
P
A
C
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
P
A
C
E

29.6'

FRONT YARD SETBACK
1 5
'
-
0 "
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
(
>
6 '
-
0 "
)
T
O
T
A
L
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
2 /
3 R
U
L
E
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
2 ,
5 9
0 S
F
3 2
0 S
F
2 ,
9 1
0 S
F
1 ,
8 5
0 S
F
8 0
'
-
8 "
55'-3"
6 5
%
(
<
2 /
3 O
F
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
A
R
E
A
) NO
T
E
:

C
l
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
o
f
b
r
u
s
h
a
n
d
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
v
e
g
r
o
w
t
h
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
p
e
r
F
i
r
e
C
o
d
e
3 2
5 N
O
T
E
:

A
l
l
r
o
o
f
c
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
C
l
a
s
s
"
"
A
"
"
a
s
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
1 5
0 5
.
1 .
1 (
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
3 2
7 .
5 .
2 &
R
9 0
2 )
5 '
-
0 "
M
I
N
F
I
R
E
P
A
T
H
N
E
W
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
E
A
N
E
W
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
5 ,
6 6
2 S
F
181'-0"

REAR SETBACK
>44.6"

MIN ALLOWABLE
8 '
M
I
N
5 '
M
I
N
5 '-0
"
M
I
N
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
S
t
e
p
s
p
a
v
e
w
a
l
k
w
a
y
s
p
r
oj
e
c
t
i
n
t
o
a
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
y
a
r
d
u
p
t
o
a
p
o
i
n
t
n
o
t
c
l
o
s
e
r
t
h
a
n
t
h
r
e
e
fe
e
t
t
o
a
p
r
o
p
e
rt
y
l
i
n
e
.

H
e
i
g
h
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
a
i
l
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
n
o
t
e
x
c
e
e
d
s
i
x
fe
e
t
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
g
r
a
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.

T
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
n
o
b
a
l
c
o
n
i
e
s
,
d
e
c
k
s
,
t
e
r
r
a
c
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
s
i
x
fe
e
t
a
b
o
v
e
g
r
a
d
e
w
i
t
h
-
i
n
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
.

T
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
n
o
o
p
e
n
,
u
n
e
n
c
l
o
s
e
d
f
i
r
e
e
s
c
a
p
e
s
a
n
d
f
i
r
e
p
r
o
o
f
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
w
i
t
h
-
i
n
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
.

T
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
G
r
o
u
n
d
-
m
o
u
n
t
e
d
p
o
o
l
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
i
r
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
e
r
s
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
t
-
i
n
b
a
r
b
e
c
u
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
w
i
t
h
-
i
n
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
.

D
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
,
w
a
l
k
w
a
y
s
,
p
a
t
i
o
s
l
a
b
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
a
r
e
a
s
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
o
f
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
,
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
o
r
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
d
o
n
o
t
e
x
c
e
e
d
o
n
e
f
o
o
t
a
b
o
v
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
.

D
e
c
k
s
o
v
e
r
o
n
e
fo
o
t
h
i
g
h
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
e
d
b
y
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
3 .
5 .
3 (
B
)
(
3 )
o
f
t
h
e
M
a
l
i
b
u
L
I
P
.
3 '
-
0 "
3 '
-
0 "
1 4'-
0 "
2 0
'
-
0 "
55 165
N
I
Q
S
M
p
c
P
V
M
p
c
p
b
`
l
k
a
c
i
l
l
o
d
^
o
^
d
b
^
J
M
K
O
a^sfa hbiibk H ^ppl`f^qbpI fk`K
OTMN ^ of mloq ^sbkrbI prfqb @OMO
p^kq^ jlk `f ^I `^ VMQMR
qbibmelkb PNM OQRJPRUQ
b j^fiW Ç~îáÇâÉääÉåNNT]Öã~áäKÅçã
qlq^i absbilmjbkq
pnr^ob cllq^db
p
`
^
i
b
W
N
L
U
?
Z
N
D
J
M
?
O
obpfabk`b il`^qba ^qW
OVPOV eb^qe`ifcc ol^a
j^if_rI `^ VMOSR
q
l
q
^
i
a
b
s
b
i
l
m
j
b
k
q
p
n
r
^
o
b
c
l
l
q
^
d
b
p
b
`
l
k
a
c
i
l
l
o
p
`
^
i
b
W
N
L
U
?
Z
N
D
J
M
?
N
q
l
q
^
i
a
b
s
b
i
l
m
j
b
k
q
p
n
r
^
o
b
c
l
l
q
^
d
b
c
f
o
p
q
c
i
l
l
o
N
p
q
c
i
l
l
o
a
t
b
i
i
f
k
d
J
O
I
R
V
M
p
c
l
s
b
o
e
^
k
d
b
[
S
D
J
M
?
P
O
M
p
c
pbmqbj_bo ONI OMO
O
I
R
V
M
p
c
P
P
O
M
p
c
O
I
V
N
M
p
c
c
f
o
p
q
c
i
l
l
o
l
s
b
o
e
^
k
d
b
E
[
S
D
J
M
?
F
q
l
q
^
i
c
f
o
p
q
c
i
l
l
o
p
b
`
l
k
a
c
i
l
l
o
q
l
q
^
i
a
t
b
i
i
f
k
d
c
f
o
p
q
c
i
l
l
o
l
s
b
o
e
^
k
d
E
[
S
D
J
M
?
F
q
l
q
^
i
l
s
b
o
e
^
k
d
E
[
S
D
J
M
?
F
d
^
o
^
d
b
m
o
l
m
l
p
b
a
c
i
l
l
o
^
o
b
^
q
l
q
^
i
a
b
s
b
i
l
m
j
b
k
q
p
n
r
^
o
b
c
l
l
q
^
d
b
O
I
R
V
M
p
c
N
I
Q
S
M
p
c
Q
I
M
R
M
p
c
P
O
M
p
c
P
O
M
p
c
P
V
M
p
c
Q
I
T
S
M
p
c
^
i
i
l
t
^
_
i
b
c
i
l
l
o
^
o
b
^
O
N
I
T
U
M
p
c
u
K
N
T
T
Z
P
I
U
R
R
H
N
I
M
M
M
Z
Q
I
U
R
R
p
c
O
U
N
M
N
p
c
E
^
o
b
^
l
c
p
f
q
b
d
o
b
^
q
b
o
q
e
^
k
N
W
N
p
i
l
m
b
F
J
O
N
I
T
U
M
p
c
Z
S
I
P
O
N
p
c
u
K
N
M
Z
S
P
O
p
c
Q
I
U
R
R
p
c
H
S
P
O
p
c
Z
R
I
Q
U
T
p
c
E
Y
R
I
Q
U
T
p
c
^
i
i
l
t
^
_
i
b
F
O
k
a
c
i
l
l
o
a
t
b
i
i
f
k
d
J
N
I
Q
S
M
p
c
d
^
o
^
d
b
J
P
V
M
p
c
166
A
-
1 .
1 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 G
A
R
A
G
E
L
I
V
I
N
G
/
D
I
N
I
N
G
E
N
T
R
Y
A
-
3 .
2 A
-
3 .
3 1
A
-
3 .
3 2
1 P
A
N
T
R
Y
D
E
C
K
1 2
F
F
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
F
F
E
L
1 9
1 .
0 0
'
D
N
A
-
3 .
2 2
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
N
APRIL 1, 2024
T
R
E
L
L
I
S
N
O
T
I
N
C
L
U
D
E
D
I
N
A
R
E
A
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
F
F
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
S
W
I
M
M
I
N
G
P
O
O
L
E
L
1 8
5 .
5 0
-
B
O
T
T
O
M
E
L
1 8
9 .
6 0
-
T
O
P
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
AB
5 3
'
-
7 "
1 9
'
-
6 "
7 3
'
-
1 "
34'-10"
21'-0"
D
E
C
K
B
E
L
O
W
S
E
E
A
-
1 .
2 D
E
C
K
B
E
L
O
W
S
E
E
A
-
1 .
2 CDE
S
DCM
S
D
D
E
N
O
T
E
S
S
M
O
K
E
D
E
T
E
C
T
O
R
C
M
W
H
E
N
M
O
R
E
T
H
A
N
O
N
E
S
M
O
K
E
A
L
A
R
M
I
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
T
O
B
E
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
W
I
T
H
I
N
A
N
D
I
N
D
I
V
I
D
U
A
L
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
U
N
I
T
T
H
E
A
L
A
R
M
D
E
V
I
E
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
I
N
T
E
R
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
E
D
I
N
S
U
C
HA
M
A
N
N
E
R
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
A
C
T
U
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
O
N
E
A
L
A
R
M
W
I
L
L
A
C
T
I
V
A
T
E
A
L
L
O
F
T
H
E
A
L
A
R
M
S
I
N
T
H
E
I
N
D
I
V
I
D
U
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
M
O
K
E
A
L
A
R
M
S
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
C
E
I
V
E
T
H
E
I
R
P
R
I
M
A
R
Y
P
O
W
E
R
F
R
O
M
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
W
I
R
I
N
G
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
T
H
A
T
S
U
C
H
W
I
R
I
N
G
I
S
S
E
R
V
E
D
F
R
O
M
A
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
S
O
U
R
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
E
Q
U
I
P
P
E
D
W
I
T
H
A
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
B
A
C
K
U
P
D
E
N
O
T
E
S
C
A
R
B
O
N
M
O
N
O
X
I
D
E
A
L
A
R
M
W
H
E
N
M
O
R
E
T
H
A
N
O
N
E
C
A
R
B
O
N
M
O
N
O
X
I
D
E
A
L
A
R
M
I
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
T
O
B
E
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
W
I
T
H
I
N
A
N
D
I
N
D
I
V
I
D
U
A
L
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
U
N
I
T
T
H
E
A
L
A
R
M
D
E
V
I
E
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
I
N
T
E
R
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
E
D
I
N
S
U
C
H
A
M
A
N
N
E
R
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
A
C
T
U
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
O
N
E
A
L
A
R
M
W
I
L
L
A
C
T
I
V
A
T
E
A
L
L
O
F
T
H
E
A
L
A
R
M
S
I
N
T
H
E
I
N
D
I
V
I
D
U
A
L
U
N
I
T
C
A
R
B
O
N
M
O
N
O
X
I
D
E
A
L
A
R
M
S
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
C
E
I
V
E
T
H
E
I
R
P
R
I
M
A
R
Y
P
O
W
E
R
F
R
O
M
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
W
I
R
I
N
G
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
T
H
A
T
S
U
C
H
W
I
R
I
N
G
I
S
S
E
R
V
E
D
F
R
O
M
A
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
S
O
U
R
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
E
Q
U
I
P
P
E
D
W
I
T
H
A
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
B
A
C
K
U
P
C
A
R
B
O
N
M
O
N
O
X
I
D
E
A
L
A
R
M
S
S
H
A
L
B
E
L
I
S
T
E
D
A
S
C
O
M
P
L
Y
I
N
G
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
U
L
2 0
3 4
.

C
A
R
B
O
N
M
O
N
O
X
I
D
E
D
E
T
E
C
T
O
R
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
L
I
S
T
E
D
A
S
C
O
M
P
L
Y
I
N
G
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
U
L
2 0
7 5
D
O
O
R
N
O
T
E
S
:

E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
D
O
O
R
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
I
E
S
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
N
F
O
R
M
T
O
P
E
R
F
O
M
A
N
C
E
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
F
M
1 2
-
7 A
-
1 (
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
C
O
D
E
R
3 2
7 .
8 .
3 A
N
D
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
C
O
D
E
7 0
8 A
.
3 )
W
I
N
D
O
W
N
O
T
E
S
:

E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
,
W
I
N
D
O
W
W
A
L
L
S
,
G
L
A
Z
E
D
D
O
O
R
A
N
D
G
L
A
Z
E
D
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
S
W
I
T
H
I
N
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
D
O
O
R
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
M
U
L
T
I
-
P
A
N
E
G
L
A
Z
I
N
G
U
N
I
T
S
W
I
T
H
A
M
I
N
I
M
U
M
O
F
O
N
E
T
E
M
P
E
R
E
D
P
A
N
E
N
o
t
e
:

D
e
c
k
i
n
g
,
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
s
,
s
t
a
i
r
t
r
e
a
d
s
,
r
i
s
e
r
s
,
a
n
dl
a
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
d
e
c
k
s
,
p
o
r
c
h
e
s
,
a
n
d
b
a
l
c
o
n
i
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
a
n
y
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
u
c
h
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
i
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
1 0
f
e
e
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
y
w
i
t
h
u
s
e
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
n
o
n
c
o
m
b
u
s
t
i
b
l
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
(
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
3 2
7 .
9 .
1 a
n
d
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
gC
o
d
e
7 0
9 A
.
3 )
A
-
3 .
2 1
A
-
2 .
1 1
A
-
2 .
1 2
A
-
2 .
2 1
167
A-1.2
D
A
VID
K
E
L
L
E
N
+
A
S
S
O
CIA
T
E
S, IN
C. 2
7 01 AIR
P
O
R
T
A
V
E
N
U
E, S
UIT
E
#
2 0
2 S
A
N
T
A
M
O
N

CI A, C
A
9 0
4 0
5 T
E
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
310
2 4
5-3
5 8
4 E
M
AIL: d
a
vid
k
elle
n117
@
g
m
ail.c
o
m
F
RI S
T
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
N
APRIL 1, 2024
A
B
C
D
E

SD DENOTES SMOKE DETECTOR
CM

WHEN MORE THAN ONE SMOKE ALARM

IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN

AND INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNIT THE

ALARM DEVIES SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED

IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THE ACTUATION

OF ONE ALARM WILL ACTIVATE ALL OF THE ALARMS

IN THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT

SMOKE ALARMS SHALL RECEIVE

THEIR PRIMARY POWER FROM THE BUILDING

WIRING PROVIDED THAT SUCH WIRING IS SERVED FROM A

COMMERCIAL SOURCE AND

SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A BATTERY BACKUP

DENOTES CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM

WHEN MORE THAN ONE CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM

IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN

AND INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNIT THE

ALARM DEVIES SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED

IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THE ACTUATION

OF ONE ALARM WILL ACTIVATE ALL OF THE ALARMS

IN THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT

CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL RECEIVE

THEIR PRIMARY POWER FROM THE BUILDING

WIRING PROVIDED THAT SUCH WIRING IS SERVED FROM A

COMMERCIAL SOURCE AND

SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A BATTERY BACKUP

CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHAL BE LISTED

AS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
UL 2034. CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS

SHALL BE LISTED AS COMPLYING WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF UL 2075
Note:

EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL CONFORM TO
PERFOMANCE STANDARD SFM 12-7A-1
(RESIDENTIAL CODE R327.8.3 AND
BUILDING CODE 708A.3)
WINDOW NOTES:

EXTERIOR WINDOWS, WINDOW WALLS,

GLAZED DOOR AND GLAZED OPENINGS

WITHIN EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE

MULTI-PANE GLAZING UNITS WITH A

MINIMUM OF ONE TEMPERED PANE

EXTERIOR DECK

AT GRADE
FF EL 179.30'
A-3.2
1 A-2.1
1 A-2.1
2 A-2.2
1 2 1

SEE LANDSCAPE
PLAN
FF EL 179.00'

EXTERIOR DECK

AT GRADE
FF EL 179.90'

EXTERIOR DECK

AT GRADE
FF EL 177.50'

SIDEYARD

SET BACK

SIDEYARD

SET BACK
UP
A-3.3
2 1
A-3.3
A-3.2
2 DECK ABOVE
< 6'-0" OVERHANG TYP.

NOT IN AREA CALCULATIONS

DECK ABOVE/POOL
>6'-0" OVERHANG TYP.

INCLUDED IN AREA CALCULATIONS
3 8'-4"
78'-4"
72'-11"
SD
CM
SD
SD
CM SD
FF EL 180.00'
S
L
O
P
E
D
O
W
N
1/4" / 1'-0"

EXTERIOR DECK

AT GRADE
FF EL 179.30'
78'-4"
SD SD
BEDROOM 4 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 1

LAUNDRY
168
A
-
1 .
3 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]

ROOF PLAN
R
O
O
F
P
L
A
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 1
2 D
E
C
K
B
E
L
O
W
B
UR
O
O
F
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
'
B
U
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
B
U
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
S
I
D
E
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
I
D
E
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
A
-
3 .
2 A
-
3 .
3 1
A
-
3 .
3 2
1 A
-
3 .
2 2
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
N
1 9
5 1
9 0
1 8
5 E
L
1 9
0 '
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
P
A
T
I
O
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
'
P
A
T
I
O
E
L
1 7
8 .
5 0
1 9
0 1
8 5
1 8
0 T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
E
L
1 8
4 .
0 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
E
L
1 9
7 .
0 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
E
L
1 8
2 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
S
L
O
P
E
D
N
1 /
4 =
1 '
-
0 "

SLOPE DN
1/4 = 1'-0"

SLOPE DN
1/4 = 1'-0"
S
L
O
P
E
D
N
1 /
4 =
1 '
-
0 "
E
L
1 8
1 .
0 0
APRIL 1, 2024
ABCDE
N
O
T
E
:

R
O
O
F
G
U
T
T
E
R
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
W
I
H
T
A
M
E
A
N
S
T
O
P
R
E
V
E
N
T
T
H
E
A
C
C
U
M
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
L
E
A
V
E
S
A
N
D
D
E
B
R
I
S
I
N
T
H
E
G
U
T
T
E
R
N
O
T
E
:

A
l
l
r
o
o
f
c
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
C
l
a
s
s
"
"
A
"
"
a
s
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
1 5
0 5
.
1 .
1 (
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
3 2
7 .
5 .
2 &
R
9 0
2 )
A
-
2 .
1 1
A
-
2 .
1 2
A
-
2 .
2 1
T
.

O
.

C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 8
9 .
9 T
.

O
.

R
A
I
L
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
3 .
4 T
.

O
.

C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 8
9 .
9 T
.

O
.

R
A
I
L
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
3 .
4 T
.

O
.

C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 8
9 .
9 T
.

O
.

R
A
I
L
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
3 .
4 T
.

O
.

C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 8
9 .
9 T
.

O
.

R
A
I
L
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
3 .
4 T
.

O
.

C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
1 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
1 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
1 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
T
.

O
.

R
A
I
L
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
3 .
5 T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
N
O
T
E
:

N
O
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
O
N
R
O
O
F
F
A
U
'
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
L
O
C
A
T
E
D
O
N
L
O
W
E
R
L
E
V
E
L
C
O
N
D
E
N
S
E
R
S
U
N
D
E
R
P
O
O
L
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0 B
U
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
169
A
-
2 .
1 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]
SECTIONS RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
APRIL 1, 2024
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 18'-0"
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
D
E
C
K
G
A
R
A
G
E
M
A
S
T
E
R
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
'
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
1 8
'
-
0 "
A
B
O
V
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
4"
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
2 E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
D
E
C
K
K
I
T
C
H
E
N
P
A
T
I
O
F
A
M
I
L
Y
R
O
O
M
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
1 8
'
-
0 "
A
B
O
V
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
7"
18'-0"
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
15 -' 10"
13'-1"
14'-8"
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
17'-10"
16'-7"
170
A
-
2 .
2 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]
SECTIONS RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
APRIL 1, 2024
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 P
A
T
I
O
L
I
V
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 L
I
V
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
D
E
C
K
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
1 8
'
-
0 "
A
B
O
V
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
'
18'-0"
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
17 -' 8"
14'-2"
16'-5"
8"
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
171
A
-
3 .
2 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]

ELEVATIONS
E
A
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
2 E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
F
I
N
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
APRIL 1, 2024
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
18'-0"
S
T
U
C
C
O
2 X
6 @
1 6
"
O
C
F
I
R
E
B
L
O
C
K
I
N
G
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
5 /
8 "
T
Y
P
E
X
G
Y
P
.

B
D
.

I
G
N
I
T
I
O
N
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
D
E
T
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
3 N
O
T
E
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
w
a
l
l
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
.
17'-9"
P
O
O
L
E
Q
U
I
P
12'-11"
11'-0"
11'-2"
1 8
'
-
0 "
A
B
O
V
E
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
.

S
E
E
D
E
T
3 F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
N
A
T
G
R
A
D
E
15'-4"
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
172
A
-
3 .
3 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]

ELEVATIONS
S
O
U
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
.

S
E
E
D
E
T
3 APRIL 1, 2024
2 X
6 @
1 6
"
O
C
F
I
R
E
B
L
O
C
K
I
N
G
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
5 /
8 "
T
Y
P
E
X
G
Y
P
.

B
D
.

I
G
N
I
T
I
O
N
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
D
E
T
3 N
O
T
E
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
w
a
l
l
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
.

W
E
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
2 F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
N
A
T
U
R
A
L
G
R
A
D
E
8"
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
N
A
T
U
R
A
L
G
R
A
D
E
14'-6"
15'-6"
11'-0"
16'-6"
FROM

NAT GRADE
13'-4"
12'-3"
8'-9"
11'-6"
17'-6"
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
.

S
E
E
D
E
T
3 F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
N
A
T
U
R
A
L
G
R
A
D
E
1 8
'
-
0 "
A
B
O
V
E
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
DG
R
A
D
E
18'-0"
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
18'-0"
18'-0"
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.

O
.

P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
173
APN 4468-011-011
APN 4468-011-009
APN 4468-011-012
APN 4468-011-010
APN 4468-011-013
191.00 F.F.
180.00 F.F. 189.80 T.G.
178.50 FS
179.80 FS
190.00 F.F. 191.50 FS 193.00 FS
180.50 189.75 FS 179.50 FS 179.80 FS 186.00
180.00 FS 189.90 179.33 179.80 FS
200.15 TP 198.66 FS 194.20 FS 197.40 FS
APN 4468-011-009 APN 4468-011-012
F.H.

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
APN 4468-011-011

VICINITY MAP

WITH SITE PLAN OVERLAY

SLOPE BAND ANALYSIS
174

45. ALL TRENCH BACKFILLS SHALL BE TESTED AND APPROVED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER. 46. ENGINEER MUST SET GRADE STAKES FOR ALL DRAINAGE DEVICES AND OBTAIN INSPECTION BEFORE POURING. 47. STOCKPILING OF EXCESS MATERIAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 48. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE STATEMENT TO THE GRADING INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 3318.1 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING CODE AT THE COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. 49. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT VERIFYING THAT THE WORK DONE UNDER HIS DIRECTION WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND REQUIREMENTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING CODE OR DESCRIBING ALL VARIANCES FROM THE APPROVED PLANS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE. 50. THE FIELD ENGINEER, AS A CONDITION OF ROUGH GRADE APPROVAL, SHALL PROVIDE A BLUE TOP WITH ACCOMPANYING WITNESS STAKE, SET AT THE CENTER OF EACH PAD REFLECTING THE PAD ELEVATION FOR PRECISE PERMITS AND A BLUE TOP WITH WITNESS STAKE SET AT THE DRAINAGE SWALE HIGH POINT REFLECTING THE HIGH POINT ELEVATION FOR PRELIMINARY PERMITS. 51. ANY EXCAVATIONS ADJACENT TO OTHER PROPERTY OR STRUCTURES ARE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE, SECTION 832, AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE AND/OR OWNER. 52. ALL GRADED SITES MUST HAVE DRAINAGE SWALES, BERMS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE DEVICES INSTALLED PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL. PER SECTION 3317.6 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING CODE. 53. FINAL GRADING MUST BE APPROVED BEFORE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS WILL BE ALLOWED PER SECTION 3318 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING CODE. 54. EXISTING UNCERTIFIED FILL SHALL NOT BE USED FOR SUPPORT OF FOOTINGS, FLOOR SLAB, OR OTHER PROPOSED FILL. 55. FILL SHALL NOT BE PLACED UNTIL THE COUNTY INSPECTOR HAS INSPECTED AND APPROVED THE BOTTOM. 56. ALL FILLS USED TO SUPPORT THE FOUNDATIONS OF ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLACED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, AND THE PLACEMENT OF THE FILL SHALL BE OBSERVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR HIS QUALIFIED REPRESENTATIVE. A COMPACTION REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW UPON COMPLETION OF WORK (UBC APPENDIX 3317). 57. COMPACTED FILL SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE FOOTINGS A MINIMUM DISTANCE EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE FILL BELOW THE FOOTING. 58. ALL FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY (UBC APPENDIX 3313.4). 59. GRADING SHALL NOT BE STARTED WITHOUT FIRST NOTIFING THE GRADING INSPECTOR. A PRE-GRADING MEETING ON THE SITE IS REQUIRED BEFORE START OF GRADING WITH THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE PRESENT: OWNER, GRADING CONTRACTOR, DESIGN CIVIL ENGINEER, SOIL ENGINEER, GEOLOGIST AND GRADING INSPECTOR. THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS FOR GRADING WILL BE EXPLAINED AT THIS MEETING 60. THE ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT A LETTER OF CERTIFICATION TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL STATING THAT THE GRADING WAS DINE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO APPENDIX CHAPTER 33 AND CHAPTER 71 (LATEST EDITION) OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THESE PLANS. 2. ANY MODIFICATIONS OF OR CHANGES TO APPROVED GRADING PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 3. NO GRADING SHALL BE STARTED WITHOUT FIRST NOTIFYING THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. A PRE-GRADING MEETING AT THE SITE IS REQUIRED BEFORE THE START OF THE GRADING WITH THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE PRESENT: OWNER, GRADING CONTRACTOR, DESIGN CIVIL ENGINEER, SOILS ENGINEER, GEOLOGIST, COUNTY GRADING INSPECTOR(S) OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES, AND WHEN REQUIRED THE ARCHEOLOGIST OR OTHER JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. PERMITTEE OR HIS AGENT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING PRE-GRADE MEETING AND MUST NOTIFY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AT LEAST TWO BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO PROPOSED PRE-GRADE MEETING. 4. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS REFLECT SOLELY THE REVIEW OF PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY POSITION BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES OR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS REGARDING THE STATUS OF ANY TITLE ISSUES RELATING TO THE LAND ON WHICH THE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED. ANY DISPUTES RELATING TO TITLE ARE SOLELY A PRIVATE MATTER NOT INVOLVING THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES OR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 5. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CODE, TITLE 12, SECTION 12.12.030 THAT CONTROLS AND RESTRICTS NOISE FROM THE USE OF CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING EQUIPMENT FROM THE HOURS OF 8:00 PM TO 6:30 AM, AND ON SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS. (MORE RESTRICTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TIMES MAY GOVERN, AS REQUIRED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING AND SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLANS WHEN APPLICABLE.) 6. CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE (SECTION 5097.98) AND HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE (SECTION 7050.5) ADDRESS THE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITION OF HUMAN REMAINS. IN THE EVENT OF DISCOVERY OR RECOGNITION OF ANY HUMAN REMAINS IN ANY LOCATION OTHER THAN A DEDICATED CEMETERY, THE LAW REQUIRES THAT GRADING IMMEDIATELY STOPS AND NO FURTHER EXCAVATION OR DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE, OR ANY NEARBY AREA WHERE HUMAN REMAINS MAY BE LOCATED, OCCUR UNTIL THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN: a. THE COUNTY CORONER HAS BEEN INFORMED AND HAS DETERMINED THAT NO INVESTIGATION OF THE CAUSE OF DEATH IS REQUIRED, AND b. IF THE REMAINS ARE OF NATIVE AMERICAN ORIGIN, THE DESCENDANTS FROM THE DECEASED NATIVE AMERICANS HAVE MADE A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE MEANS OF TREATING OR DISPOSING, WITH APPROPRIATE DIGNITY, OF THE HUMAN REMAINS AND ANY ASSOCIATED GRAVE GOODS. 7. THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE. 8. ALL EXPORT OF MATERIAL FROM THE SITE MUST GO TO A PERMITTED SITE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR A LEGAL DUMPSITE. RECEIPTS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF EXCESS MATERIAL BY A DUMPSITE ARE REQUIRED AND MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL UPON REQUEST. 9. A COPY OF THE GRADING PERMIT AND APPROVED GRADING PLANS MUST BE IN THE POSSESSION OF A RESPONSIBLE PERSON AND AVAILABLE AT THE SITE AT ALL TIMES. 10. SITE BOUNDARIES, EASEMENTS, DRAINAGE DEVICES, RESTRICTED USE AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED PER CONSTRUCTION STAKING BY FIELD ENGINEER OR LICENSED SURVEYOR. PRIOR TO GRADING, AS REQUESTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ALL PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, AND RESTRICTED USE AREAS SHALL BE STAKED. 11. NO GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE OF ANY OAK TREE AS REQUIRED PER TITLE CHAPTER 22.56 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ZONING CODE. THE PROTECTED ZONE SHALL MEAN THAT AREA WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF AN OAK TREE EXTENDING THERE FROM A POINT AT LEAST FIVE FEET OUTSIDE THE DRIP LINE, OR 15 FEET FROM THE TRUNK(S) OF A TREE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 12. THE STANDARD RETAINING WALL DETAILS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLANS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. STANDARD RETAINING WALLS ARE NOT CHECKED, PERMITTED, OR INSPECTED PER THE GRADING PERMIT. A SEPARATE RETAINING WALL PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL STANDARD RETAINING WALLS. THIS NOTE ONLY APPLIES TO STANDARD RETAINING WALLS. GEOGRID FABRIC AND SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS DO NOT REQUIRE A SEPARATE RETAINING WAIL PERMIT. DETAILS AND CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR ALL GEOGRID WALLS MUST BE ON THE GRADING PLAN. 13. A PREVENTIVE PROGRAM TO PROTECT THE SLOPES FROM POTENTIAL DAMAGE FROM BURROWING RODENTS IS REQUIRED PER SECTION 3307.6 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE. OWNER IS TO INSPECT SLOPES PERIODICALLY FOR EVIDENCE OF BURROWING RODENTS AND A FIRST EVIDENCE OF THEIR EXISTENCE SHALL EMPLOY AN EXTERMINATOR FOR THEIR REMOVAL. 14. NO GRADING AUTHORIZED BY THIS PLAN THROUGH THE RAINY SEASON, NOVEMBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 15. 15. TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY: IF THE CIVIL ENGINEER, THE SOILS ENGINEER, OR THE ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST OF RECORD IS CHANGED DURING GRADING, THE WORK SHALL BE STOPPED UNTIL THE REPLACEMENT HAS AGREED IN WRITING TO ACCEPT THEIR RESPONSIBILITY WITHIN THE AREA OF TECHNICAL COMPETENCE FOR APPROVAL UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE PERMITTEE TO NOTIFY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN WRITING OF SUCH CHANGE PRIOR TO THE RECOMMENCEMENT OF SUCH GRADING. INSPECTION NOTES: 16. THE PERMITTEE OR HIS AGENT SHALL NOTIFY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AT LEAST ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT FOLLOWING STAGES OF THE WORK. (SECTION 3317 OF THE BUILDING CODE.) (a) INITIAL. WHEN THE SITE HAS BEEN CLEARED OF VEGETATION AND UNAPPROVED FILL HAS BEEN SCARIFIED, BENCHED OR OTHERWISE PREPARED FOR FILL. FILL SHALL NOT BE PLACED PRIOR TO THIS INSPECTION. NOTE: PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING GRADING, ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES INCLUDING EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WHICH CONTAIN SEDIMENTS MUST BE INSTALLED. (b) ROUGH WHEN APPROXIMATE FINAL ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED; DRAINAGE TERRACES, SWALES AND BERMS INSTALLED AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE; AND THE STATEMENTS REQUIRED IN THIS SECTION HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. (c) FINAL. WHEN GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED; ALL DRAINAGE DEVICES INSTALLED; SLOPE PLANTING ESTABLISHED, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS INSTALLED AND THE AS-BUILT PLANS, REQUIRED STATEMENTS, AND REPORTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED. 17. IN ADDITION TO THE INSPECTION REQUIRED OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR REGULAR GRADING, REPORTS AND STATEMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 3317 AND 3318 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE. 18. ALL GRADED SITES MUST HAVE DRAINAGE SWALES, BERMS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE DEVICES INSTALLED PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL. PER SECTION 3317.6 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE. 19. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE STATEMENT TO THE GRADING INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 3318.1 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE AT THE COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. 20. FINAL GRADING MUST BE APPROVED BEFORE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS WILL BE ALLOWED PER SECTION 3318 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE. DRAINAGE NOTES: 21. ROOF DRAINAGE MUST BE DIVERTED FROM GRADED SLOPES. 22. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE FOR CONTRIBUTORY DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES. 23. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING WITHIN A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ARE TO BE DONE PER PRIVATE DRAIN PD NO. N/A OR MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER DRAIN MTD NO. N/A . 24. ALL STORM DRAIN WORK IS TO BE DONE UNDER CONTINUOUS INSPECTION BY THE FIELD ENGINEER. WEEKLY STATUS REPORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY THE FIELD ENGINEER TO THE LOCAL BUILDING AND SAFETY DISTRICT OFFICE. AGENCY NOTES: 25. AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FROM CITY OF MALIBU DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITHIN OR AFFECTING ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. ALL WORK WITHIN ROAD RIGHT OF WAY SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. 26. AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT /CONNECTION PERMIT IS REQUIRED FROM THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RIGHT OF WAY. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH CONDITIONS SET BY THE PERMIT. 27. PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OR THE LOCAL FIRE STATION PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 28. ALL WORK WITHIN THE STREAMBED AND AREAS OUTLINED ON GRADING PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO: · ARMY CORP 404 PERMIT NUMBER: N/A · CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME PERMIT NO.: N/A GENERAL GEOTECHNICAL NOTES: 29. ALL WORK MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT'S REPORT(S) AND THE APPROVED GRADING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 30. GRADING OPERATIONS MUST BE CONDUCTED UNDER PERIODIC INSPECTIONS BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS WITH MONTHLY INSPECTION REPORTS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE GEOLOGY AND SOILS SECTION. 31. THE SOIL ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INSPECTIONS DURING THE PREPARATION OF THE NATURAL GROUND AND THE PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF THE FILL TO BE SATISFIED THAT THE WORK IS BEING PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAN AND APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. 32. ROUGH GRADING MUST BE APPROVED BY A FINAL ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND SOILS ENGINEERING REPORT. AN AS-BUILT GEOLOGIC MAP MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL GEOLOGY REPORT. PROVIDE A FINAL REPORT STATEMENT THAT VERIFIES WORK WAS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND CODE PROVISIONS (SECTION 3318.1 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE). THE FINAL REPORT(S) MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 33. FOUNDATION, WALL AND POOL EXCAVATIONS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CONSULTING GEOLOGIST AND SOIL ENGINEER, PRIOR TO THE PLACING OF STEEL OR CONCRETE. 34. BUILDING PADS LOCATED IN CUT/FILL TRANSITION AREAS SHALL BE OVER-EXCAVATED A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) FEET BELOW THE PROPOSED BOTTOM OF FOOTING. FILL NOTES: 35. ALL FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM RELATIVE COMPACTION CRITERIA: a. 90 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY WITHIN 40 FEET BELOW FINISH GRADE. b. 93 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY DEEPER THAN 40 FEET BELOW FINISH GRADE, UNLESS A LOWER RELATIVE COMPACTION (NOT LESS THAN 90 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY) IS JUSTIFIED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE RELATIVE COMPACTION SHALL BE DETERMINED BY A.S.T.M. SOIL COMPACTION TEST D1557-91 WHERE APPLICABLE: WHERE NOT APPLICABLE, A TEST ACCEPTABLE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE USED. (SECTION 3313.4 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE.) 36. FIELD DENSITY SHALL BE DETERMINED BY A METHOD ACCEPTABLE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. (SECTION 3313.4 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE.) HOWEVER, NOT LESS THAN 10% OF THE REQUIRED DENSITY TEST, UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED, AND SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE SAND CONE METHOD. 37. SUFFICIENT TESTS OF THE FILL SOILS SHALL BE MADE TO DETERMINE THE RELATIVE COMPACTION OF THE FILL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM GUIDELINES: a. ONE TEST FOR EACH TWO-FOOT VERTICAL LIFT. b. ONE TEST FOR EACH 1,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL PLACED. c. ONE TEST AT THE LOCATION OF THE FINAL FILL SLOPE FOR EACH BUILDING SITE (LOT) IN EACH FOUR-FOOT VERTICAL LIFT OR PORTION THEREOF. d. ONE TEST IN THE VICINITY OF EACH BUILDING PAD FOR EACH FOUR-FOOT VERTICAL LIFT OR PORTION THEREOF. 38. SUFFICIENT TESTS OF FILL SOILS SHALL BE MADE TO VERIFY THAT THE SOIL PROPERTIES COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, AS DETERMINED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER INCLUDING SOIL TYPES, SHEAR STRENGTHS PARAMETERS AND CORRESPONDING UNIT WEIGHTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES: a. PRIOR AND SUBSEQUENT TO PLACEMENT OF THE FILL, SHEAR TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN ON EACH TYPE OF SOIL OR SOIL MIXTURE TO BE USED FOR ALL FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN THREE (3) HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL. b. SHEAR TEST RESULTS FOR THE PROPOSED FILL MATERIAL MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE DESIGN VALUES USED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TO DETERMINE SLOPE STABILITY REQUIREMENTS. OTHERWISE, THE SLOPE MUST BE REEVALUATED USING THE ACTUAL SHEAR TEST VALUE OF THE FILL MATERIAL THAT IS IN PLACE. c. FILL SOILS SHALL BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS. 39. FILL SHALL NOT BE PLACED UNTIL STRIPPING OF VEGETATION, REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE SOILS, AND INSTALLATION OF SUBDRAIN (IF ANY) HAVE BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE A "STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR MOISTURE, ASH, ORGANIC MATTER, PEAT OR OTHER ORGANIC SOILS ASTM D-2974-87 ON ANY SUSPECT MATERIAL. DETRIMENTAL AMOUNTS OF ORGANIC MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN FILLS. SOIL CONTAINING SMALL AMOUNTS OF ROOTS MAY BE ALLOWED PROVIDED THAT THE ROOTS ARE IN A QUANTITY AND DISTRIBUTED IN A MANNER THAT WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE FUTURE USE OF THE SITE AND THE SOILS ENGINEER APPROVES THE USE OF SUCH MATERIAL. 40. ROCK OR SIMILAR MATERIAL GREATER THAN 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN THE FILL UNLESS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUCH PLACEMENT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER AND APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. LOCATION, EXTENT, AND ELEVATION OF ROCK DISPOSAL AREAS MUST BE SHOWN ON AN "AS BUILT" GRADING PLAN. 41. CONTINUOUS INSPECTION BY THE SOIL ENGINEER, OR A RESPONSIBLE REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING ALL FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OPERATIONS WHERE FILLS HAVE A DEPTH GREATER THAN 30 FEET OR SLOPE SURFACE STEEPER THAN 2:1. (SECTION 3313.7 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE) 42. CONTINUOUS INSPECTION BY THE SOIL ENGINEER, OR A RESPONSIBLE REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING ALL SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION. (SECTION 3313.2 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE) 43. ALL SUBDRAIN OUTLETS ARE TO BE SURVEYED FOR LINE AND ELEVATION. SUBDRAIN INFORMATION MUST BE SHOWN ON AN "AS BUILT" GRADING PLAN. 44.FILL SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 2:1 STEEPNESS RATIO ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE PLACEMENT OF SOIL AT SUFFICIENT DISTANCE BEYOND THE PROPOSED FINISH SLOPE TO ALLOW COMPACTION EQUIPMENT TO BE OPERATED AT THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE FINAL SLOPE SURFACE. THE EXCESS FILL IS TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. OTHER CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES MAY BE USED WHEN IT IS DEMONSTRATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL THAT THE ANGLE OF SLOPE, CONSTRUCTION METHOD AND OTHER FACTORS WILL HAVE EQUIVALENT EFFECT.(SECTION 3313.4 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE.) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (SSPWC) "GREEN BOOK." 2. CONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL REGULATIONS (CAL-OSHA) SAFETY STANDARDS. IF REQUESTED BY THE INSPECTOR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROOF OF A PERMIT FROM SAID DIVISION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR AT (310) 456-2489, EXT. 235 FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OR GRADING OPERATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY CONSTRUCTION AND 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF SPECIFIC INSPECTION NEEDS DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. 4. STORAGE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION TRAILER, AND/OR PARKING AND ANY WORK WITHIN THE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL REQUIRE A CITY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. CALL THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR AT (310) 456-2489, EXT. 235 TO APPLY FOR A PERMIT. 5. STORAGE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION TRAILER, AND/OR PARKING AND ANY WORK WITHIN THE CALTRANS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL REQUIRE A CALTRANS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. SUBMIT A COPY OF THE CALTRANS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 6. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY WORKING HOURS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE PLANS. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AND SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE, PROTECT, AND SAVE ANY AND ALL SURVEY MONUMENTS THAT WILL BE OR MAY BE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED BY THEIR OPERATIONS. ONCE FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THEN NOTIFY BOTH THE DEVELOPER'S SUPERVISING CIVIL ENGINEER AND THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR. THE SUPERVISING CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL RESET ALL SAID MONUMENTS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR'S ACT. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTY INSOFAR AS IT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THESE OPERATIONS. 10. EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNS ARE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PRIOR NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. AS A MINIMUM, CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE TRAFFIC SIGNS AND STRIPING SHALL BE FURNISHED, INSTALLED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK" (THE "WATCH MANUAL"), PUBLISHED BY BNI BUILDING NEWS, INC. A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, PREPARED BY THE DEVELOPER, MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 11. DUST CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. 12. EROSION CONTROL PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PROJECTS. GRADING AND CLEARING IS PROHIBITED FROM NOVEMBER 1 TO MARCH 31 FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO ESHA AND/OR INCLUDING GRADING ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 4:1. 13. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SERVICE LATERALS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, AND PAVING UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 14. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH NPDES REQUIREMENTS. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES AND SHALL BE KEPT UPDATED. 15. ALL RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE GEOTECHNICAL/SOILS ENGINEER (AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST, WHERE EMPLOYED), AND CONTAINED IN THE REPORTS REFERENCED HEREON, AS APPROVED OR CONDITIONED BY THE CITY, SHALL BE CONSIDERED A PART OF THE GRADING PLAN. 16. ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP). 17. TERRACE DRAINS, INTERCEPTOR DRAINS, AND DOWN DRAINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 3" P.C.C. REINFORCED WITH 6"X6" X #10 W.W.M. AND SHALL BE EITHER SEMICIRCULAR OR TRIANGULAR CROSS SECTION. CONCRETE COLOR SHALL BE "OMAHA TAN" OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 18. GRADING QUANTITIES: CUT 1,805 CU.YD. FILL 174 CU.YD. EXPORT 1,631 CU.YD. IMPORT 0 CU.YD. 19. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: 10,560 S.F. = 0.24 ACRES (INCLUDING GRADING, CLEARING, AND LANDSCAPING AREA) TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 0 SQ. FT. TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 6,40 SQ. FT. FLOOD ZONE ON FIRM: D BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: N/A FT., PANEL: 06037C1518F 20. ALL SLOPES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ADJOINING STREETS, DRAINAGE CHANNELS, OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES SHALL BE GRADED NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1 FOR CUT AND FILL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER ON RECOMMENDATION OF THE PROJECT'S GEOTECHNICAL/SOILS CONSULTANT. 21. ALL CATCH BASINS AND DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE STENCILED WITH THE CITY OF MALIBU STORM DRAIN LOGO. NOTES TO CONTRACTOR: A. SEPARATE BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL RETAINING WALLS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. B. VERIFY ALL EXISTING ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO ANY HARD SURFACE CONSTRUCTION, AND ADVISE PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER IF ANY OUT OF LIMIT CONDITION ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION SURVEY . SITE ADDRESS: 29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD, MALIBU, CA 90265 APN: 4468-011-010 & 4468-011-011 OWNER: ARCHITECT: DAVID KALEN, AIA 2701 AIRPORT AVE., SUITE 202 SANTA MONICA, CA 90405 CIVIL ENGINEER: PLANEX ASSOCIATES, INC. 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 EXISTING BUILDING:0 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING: 4,570 S.F. THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVED BY THE CITY FOR SUBJECT PROJECT IN THE CITY OF MALIBU, CALIFORNIA ON _____________________ PROJECT START: N/A PROJECT COMPLETION: N/A APPROVAL BY CONSULTANTS: THIS PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND CONFORMS TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF GEOLOGIC AND SOILS REPORTS DATED: PREPARED BY: P.E. BY: ENGINEER GEOLOGIST VICINITY MAP PROJECT PROJECT INFORMATION: LEGEND: DATE: SIGNED REGI E
D PROF
E
S I MO
S
A
HEBI NO. 33508 CIVIL
S RE
T

ONAL ENGINEER

CALIFORN
S
IA
TAT E
OF10/24/2024 SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 TEL. (310) 664-9311 Associates 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. C - These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Planex Associates. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specific project and shall not be used otherwise without written permission of Planex Associates c DATE:

BY NO. DATE REVISION PFN: 1909-495 SHEET OF
29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD. , MALIBU, CA 90265 10/24/2024
GRADING PLAN 1 1 05
175
APN 4468-011-011
APN 4468-011-009
APN 4468-011-012
APN 4468-011-010
APN 4468-011-013
APN 4468-011-009 APN 4468-011-012
3' RET.
191.00 F.F.
180.00 F.F. 189.80 T.G. 193.50 TW C
178.50 FS 194.50 TW 199.50 TW 10.3% 8.4% 2.1% 3.1% 200.55 TW 6' RET. 194.00 TW 3' RET. EX. 10' GATE EX. 10' GATE 7.6% 15.5' 15' C ±1.5 RET. 0' RET. 195.00 TW 199.50 TW F C 178.50 TW 0' RET. 192.50 TW 2.5' RET. 4.5' RET. A/C-3 A/C-3 194.00 TW 5.5' RET. 199.30 TP 5' RET. 200.00 TP 200.50 TW 5' RET.

DRAIN PIPE
179.80 FS 178.50 TW 1' RET. 185.50 TW 5' RET. 6' RET.
190.00 F.F.
106' TO FIRE HYDRANT 15.5' F.H. B.V.C. E.V.C.20% 2% 0.4% 2% 2% 1' RET. 190.00 F.F. 191.50 FS 193.00 FS F C
180.50 185 180
190 175 4' RET. 4%
2' RET. 189.75 FS 194.20 TW 3' RET. 189.75 TW 3.0' RET. 185 180 179.50 FS

1.5' RET. 179.80 FS 190.00 TW 6' RET. 4.5' RET. 2.5% 186.00 180.00 FS180.50 TW 189.90 0' RET. 179.33 179.80 FS 6' RET. DRAIN PIPE 200.15 TP 2% 199.00 TW 5' RET. B.V.C. E.V.C. R=50' R=65' F 5' RET. ROCK RIP-RAP OUTLET OVERFLOW PIPE PERMAVOID EVAPO-TRANSPIRATION PLANTER 4' RET. 1' RET. PARCEL 3, APPURTENANT INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT PARCEL 3, APPURTENANT INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT PARCEL 4, APPURTENANT INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT 212 214 216 218 219 200 190 192 194 198 196 2' RET. 202 204 206 2102089% 16.4% 2%
201 14' 198.66 TW 4' RET. 198.66 FS 194.20 FS 197.40 FS SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 TEL. (310) 664-9311 Associates 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. C - These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Planex Associates. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specific project and shall not be used otherwise without written permission of Planex Associates c DATE:

BY NO. DATE REVISION PFN: 1909-495 SHEET OF
29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD. , MALIBU, CA 90265 10/17/2024
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 2 2 SCALE: 1" = 20' DATE: SIGNEDREGI E D PROFES I MO SAHEBI NO. 33508 CIVIL S RE T ONAL ENGINEER CALIFORN S IA TAT E OF10/17/2024 NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: A. THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT SHOULD DETERMINE THE EXPANSION POTENTIAL OF THE FINISH GRADE MATERIALS AT THE COMPLETION OF GRADING. FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD BE REVISED IF THE EXPANSION POTENTIAL OF FINISH GRADE MATERIALS SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERS FROM THE ASSUMED EXPANSION RANGE. B. AT THE COMPLETION OF GRADING, SAMPLES OF THE ONSITE SOILS SHOULD BE COLLECTED AND TESTED FOR CORROSION POTENTIAL. FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDING CEMENT TYPE SHOULD BE BASED ON THE CORROSION POTENTIAL OF THE FINISH GRADE MATERIALS. C. THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT SHOULD DETERMINE AT THE COMPLETION OF GRADING THE R-VALUE OF THE FINISH GRADE MATERIALS WITHIN PARKING AND ACCESS ROAD AREAS. FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN SHOULD BE BASED ON THE ACTUAL R-VALUE OF THE FINISH GRADE MATERIALS. D. SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE TESTED FOR EXPANSION INDEX PRIOR TO POURING FOOTINGS OR SLABS; FOUNDATION PLANS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND REVISED BY THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT, AS APPROPRIATE. 176
190 200 210 180 170 160 190 200 210 180 170 160 190.00 FF DRWY. SECTION A-A SCALE: 1" = 10' PROP. BLDG. WALL CUT CUT EX. BLDG. P.L. 191.00 FS 180.00 F.F. CUT 178.50 FS EVAPO-TRANSPIRATION PERMAVOID PLANTER SITE DRAIN OVERFLOW PIPE 175.00 INV. EX. GRADE ROCK RIP-RAP 200 210 195 205 215 220 225 190 200 210 195 205 215 220 225 190 50.00' 10.00' 59.40' 26.00' 11.76' (220.11 ) TP (219.70 ) EP JOIN HEATHERCLIFF RD. C/L 24.87' 15.40' (219.90 ) 201.11 TP 202.01 TP 200.11 TP (219.54 ) (217.05) 7.24' 216.80 TP 8.4% 49.00' 211.75 TP 218.99 TP 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROFILE SCALE: 1" = 10' 16.4% 2% 9% 10.3% 7.6% PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE 2.1% CUT FILL 3.1% 220 210 200 190 220 210 200 190 8.4% SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 TEL. (310) 664-9311 Associates 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. C - These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Planex Associates. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specific project and shall not be used otherwise without written permission of Planex Associates c DATE:

BY NO. DATE REVISION PFN: 1909-495 SHEET OF
29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD. , MALIBU, CA 90265 7/14/2023
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE PLAN 3 3 DATE: SIGNEDREGI E D PROFES I MO SAHEBI NO. 33508 CIVIL S RE T ONAL ENGINEER CALIFORN S IA TAT E OF7/14/2023 177
APN 4468-011-011
APN 4468-011-009
APN 4468-011-012
APN 4468-011-010
APN 4468-011-009 APN 4468-011-012
10' 15'
F.D. URNAROUND
15'
20'
50' P.L. P.L. P.L. P.L.
5'
5'

10.3%

8.4%

2.1%

3.1%

7.6%

15.5'
15'
20'
15'
106' TO FIRE HYDRANT

15.5'
F.H.

B.V.C.

E.V.C.
20%
2%

0.4%
2%
2%
G.B.

G.B.

G.B.
20' VERT. CURVE
20'
VERT. CURVE
185
175
180
4%
185
180
5' FD PATH

FD PATH
0% 2.5% 5% MAX. 5% MAX.
0%
2%
B.V.C. E.V.C. R=50'
R=65'
10' 20' PARCEL 3, APPURTENANT INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT
9%

16.4%
2%
14'
5' ADDRESS: APN: LCP ZONING DESIGNATION: GROSS LOT AREA= LOT DEPTH:= LOT WIDTH= PROPOSED FRONT YARD SETBACK= PROPOSED REAR YARD SETBACK= PROPOSED SIDE YARD SETBACK= CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VHFHSZ : OCCUPANCY: FIRE SPRINKLERS: FIRE FLOW BASED ON THE FIRE-FLOW CALCULATION AREA: REDUCTION FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS (MAXIMUM 50%): TOTAL FIRE FLOW REQUIRED : EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE: PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE: GARAGE= FIRST FLOOR= SECOND FLOOR= OVERHANG ( > 6' ) TOTAL= 29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD, MALIBU, CA 90265 4468-011-010 & 4468-011-011 A1-1 33532 SQ. FT. (0.77 ACRES) 1289' 115' 25.6' FROM PROPERTY LINE 164' 17.4' (E), & 11.7' (W) V-B YES SINGLE FAMILY YES 1750 GPM 500 GPM 1250 GPM 0 S.F. 390 SQ. FT. 2,590 SQ. FT. 1,460 SQ. FT. 320 SQ. FT. 4,570 SQ. FT. PROJECT DATA 50.00' 10.00' 59.40' 26.00' 11.76' (220.11 ) TP (219.70 ) EP JOIN HEATHERCLIFF RD. C/L 24.87' 15.40' (219.90 ) 201.11 TP 202.01 TP 200.11 TP (219.54 ) (217.05) 7.24' 216.80 TP 49.00' 211.75 TP 218.99 TP DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROFILE SCALE: 1" = 10'

16.4% 2%
9%

10.3%

7.6%

3.1% 2.1% 220 210 200 190 220 210 200 190

8.4% VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE ADDRESS: 29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD, MALIBU, CA 90265 APN: 4468-011-010 & 4468-011-011 OWNER: ARCHITECT: DAVID KALEN, AIA 2701 AIRPORT AVE., SUITE 202 SANTA MONICA, CA 90405 CIVIL ENGINEER: PLANEX ASSOCIATES, INC. 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 EXISTING BUILDING:0 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING: 4,570 S.F. THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVED BY THE CITY FOR SUBJECT PROJECT IN THE CITY OF MALIBU, CALIFORNIA ON _____________________ PROJECT START: N/A PROJECT COMPLETION: N/A PROJECT INFORMATION: ACCESS DRIVEWAY TYPICAL SECTION SCALE: 1" = 4' 15' MIN. OF 4" CRUSHED AGG. BASE @ 95% COMPACTION (CALTRANS CLASS II) MIN. 3" TYPE II, A.C. PVMT. NOTE: FINAL DRIVEWAY SECTION DESIGN FOR APPARATUS WEIGHING 25 TONS TO BE DETERMINED AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECT'S SOILS ENGINEER PER FIELD TEST. 90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE ER LABORATORY COMPACTION STANDARD ASTM D-1557. EX. FENCE EX. FENCE 1.5% 1.5% 14. WALKING ACCESS USED TO CONNECT VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL BE LEVEL, UNOBSTRUCTED BY LANDSCAPING, MINIMUM 5'-0" IN WIDTH, CLEAR TO THE SKY, ACCESSIBLE FOR FIREFIGHTING AND RESCUE PURPOSES. INDICATE ACCESS ON SITE PLAN. 15. ALL NEW SWIMMING POOLS, 5000 GALLONS OR MORE IN CAPACITY, LOCATED IN FIRE ZONE 4 OR VERY HIGH FIRE SEVERITY ZONE MAY REQUIRE AN AUXILIARY OUTLET. CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. 16. COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, 310.4 REGARDING ACCESS. 17. FIRE RESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES FOR PROTECTION OF OPENINGS TO COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, 713. 18. WALLS AND SOFFITS OF ENCLOSED USABLE SPACE UNDER INTERIOR STAIRWAYS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE ENCLOSED BY BUILDING CODE 1006.12 SHALL BE PROTECTED ON THE ENCLOSED SIDE AS REQUIRED FOR ONE-HOUR RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION. TITLE 24, 1003.3.3.9. 19. ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED, TESTED AND ACCEPTED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. FIRE CODE 501.4. 20. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL MEASURE 6"X4"X2-1/2", BRASS OR BRONZE, CONFORMING TO AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARD C503, OR APPROVED EQUAL, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT REGULATION 8. 21. PLANS SHOWING UNDERGROUND PIPING FOR PRIVATE ON-SITE FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK UNIT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. FIRE CODE 901.2, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT REGULATION 7 22. PROVIDE AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AS SET FORTH BY BUILDING CODE 903 AND FIRE CODE 903. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK UNIT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. REASON: RESIDENTIAL CODE & FIRE CODE 903.1 & FIRE FLOW REDUCTION TYPE OF FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2, 903.3.1.3 23. THE SECURITY GATE SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM ACCESS WIDTH OF 20 FEET. THE SECURITY GATE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN APPROVED MEANS OF EMERGENCY OPERATION, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED OPERATIONAL AT ALL TIMES AND REPLACED OR REPAIRED WHEN DEFECTIVE. ELECTRIC GATE OPERATORS, WHERE PROVIDED, SHALL BE LISTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL 325. GATES INTENDED FOR AUTOMATIC OPERATION SHALL BE DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED AND INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F220. GATES SHALL BE OF THE SWINGING OR SLIDING TYPE. CONSTRUCTION OF GATES SHALL BE OF MATERIALS THAT ALLOW MANUAL OPERATION BY ONE PERSON. FIRE CODE 503.6. THE SECURITY MANUAL GATE OPERATOR SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EMERGENCY OPERATION, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED OPERATIONAL AT ALL TIMES. FIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENTS 1. PROVIDE AND INDICATE ON SITE PLAN, FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS OR VEHICULAR TURN-AROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS BELOW OR PROVIDE A MINIMUM, UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF 20 FEET CLEAR TO SKY, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO WITHIN 150 FEET OF ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS. FIRE CODE 503.1.1 & 503.2.1. 2. FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESS ROADS MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN A SERVICEABLE MANNER PRIOR TO AND DURING THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. FIRE CODE 901.3. 3. THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE HYDRANTS AT THIS LOCATION IS 1,250 GALLONS PER MINUTE, AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE, FOR A DURATION OF 2 HOURS, OVER AND ABOVE THE MAXIMUM DAILY DOMESTIC DEMAND. FIRE CODE 507.3 AND APPENDIX B105.1 APPENDIX B. FIRE FLOW MAY BE OBTAINED FROM PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANT FLOWING SIMULTANEOUSLY. 4. COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, 310.9.1 REGARDING FIRE WARNING SYSTEMS. SMOKE DETECTORS TO BE HAND WIRED WITH BATTERY BACKUP. WHEN MORE THAN ONE SMOKE ALARM IS INSTALLED, `THEY SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT THE OPERATION OF ANY SMOKE ALARM CAUSES THE ALARM IN ALL SMOKE ALARMS WITHIN THE DWELLING UNIT TO SOUND (CALIFORNIA ALARM CODE). PROVIDE NOTE ON SITE PLAN AND INDICATE ON FLOOR PLAN. 5. PROVIDE ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE OCCUPANCY SEPARATION BETWEEN THE R-3 DWELLING AND THE GARAGE. (INDICATE ON FLOOR PLAN.) 6. EXIT DOORS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF OPENING WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. BUILDING CODE 1003.3.1.8. 7. WIDTH AND HEIGHT OF REQUIRED EXIT DOORWAYS SHALL COMPLY WITH TITLE 24. (INDICATE ON DOOR SCHEDULE). 8. BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS TO BE PROVIDED ON FRONT OF ALL BUILDINGS AND SHALL BE VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND. FIRE CODE 901.4.4. 9. PROVIDE A KEY BOX AS REQUIRED BY FIRE CODE 904.2 LOCATION AT GATE. 10. PROVIDE APPROVED SIGNS OR OTHER APPROVED NOTICES OR MARKINGS THAT INCLUDE THE WORDS NO PARKING-FIRE LANE. SIGNS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 12 INCHES WIDE BY 18 INCHES HIGH AND HAVE RED LETTERS ON A WHITE REFLECTIVE BACKGROUND. SIGNS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS, TO CLEARLY INDICATE THE ENTRANCE TO SUCH ROAD, OR PROHIBIT THE OBSTRUCTION THEREOF AND AT INTERVALS, AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE INSPECTOR. FIRE CODE 503.3 11. PRIVATE ROADS USED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING THE WEIGHT OF A 25-TON VEHICLE. 12. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS LESS THAN 10% SLOPE, AND NOT PAVED TO PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS, REQUIRE CERTIFICATION FROM A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER STATING THE ROAD MEETS OR EXCEEDS ALL-WEATHER STANDARDS OF LA CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 13. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS 10% OR GREATER SLOPE SHALL BE PAVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 24.00' 24.00' 35' DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROFILE (LOWER PORTION) SCALE: 1" = 10' 20' VERTICAL CURVE 20' VERTICAL CURVE 200 180 190 199.30 TP
200.00 TP 2%
189.80 TP
199.10 PI-VC
190.30
B.V.C.

E.V.C.

B.V.C.
197.10 TP
192.30 TP
190.16 TP1.5%
20% 200 180 190
PI-VC
PI-VC SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 TEL. (310) 664-9311 Associates 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. C - These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Planex Associates. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specific project and shall not be used otherwise without written permission of Planex Associates c DATE:

BY NO. DATE REVISION PFN: 1909-495 SHEET OF
29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD. , MALIBU, CA 90265 10/17/2024

FIRE ACCESS EXHIBIT
1 FD SCALE: 1" = 20' DATE: SIGNED
REGI E
D PROF
E
S I MO
S
A
HEBI NO. 33508 CIVIL
S RE
T

ONAL ENGINEER

CALIFORN
S
IA
TAT E
OF10/17/2024
178
Client:

Project location:

David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:

Date:

L A N D S C A P E

COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC

A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O

NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
08/15/2023

TITLE SHEET
L-0.1

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU CA 90265-4421
ASSESSOR'S ID No. 4468-011-011

LANDSCAPE WATER EFFICIENCY PLAN
PROJECT INFORMATION:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

GROSS LOT AREA: 33,532 SF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTING ZONE: 4
SUNSET CLIMATE ZONE: 23

PROJECT AREA
NOTES:

1. TREE CANOPIES ARE SHOWN IN FULL MATURITY.

2. MATURE TREES TO REMAIN ON SITE PROTECTED IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.

3. THE TYPE OF SOIL IS SUITABLE FOR ALL THE PROPOSED PLANTS IN THIS LANDSCAPE.

4. THERE IS NO WATER FEATURE IN THIS PROJECT.

5. WATER PURVEYOR NAME:

WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
17140 SOUTH AVALON BLVD. SUITE 210
CARSON, CA 90746-1296
(310) 217-2411

6. STREET TREES WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE TO BE PLANTED PER APPROVED STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS.

7. ALL HARDSCAPE, RETAINING WALLS, SWIMMING POOLS, AND/OR BLOCK WALLS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.

8. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY: ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE

CONTINUOUSLY PRIVATELY MAINTAINED

BY PROPERTY OWNER ON SITE & OFF
SITE.

NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY

RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE.
________________________ __________

PROPERTY OWNER DATE
SHEET INDEX:

L0.1 COVER SHEET
L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L1.1 LANDSCAPE NOTES + DETAILS
L1.2 FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN
L2.0 IRRIGATION PLAN
L2.1 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE & MWELO
L2.2 IRRIGATION DETAILS

GREEN BUILDING COMPLIANCE

I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE. __________ ______________________ ________________ PAUL LEWIS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE

AREA SUMMARY
TOTAL LOT AREA = APPROX. 33,532 SF
LANDSCAPE AREA OF PROJECT = 5,662 SF

FUEL MODIFICATION
FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN IS REQUIRED PER:

OFFICE: CALABASAS
PHONE NO. (818) 880-0341
OFFICE ADDRESS: 26600 AGOURA RD. SUITE 110
CALABASAS, CA 91302
FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN: #
FFFM:

VICINITY MAP
NTS

PROJECT AREA

LA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP
NTS
2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 179 185
180
190
192 198 196
194

DRIVEWAY

DECK AT

SECOND FLOOR
EL 190.00'
EL 190'
EL 191.5'
NEW
SINGLE
FAMILY

DWELLING
UPPER LEVEL FF EL 190'
LOWER LEVEL FF EL 180'
PATIO
EL 180.00'
PATIO
EL 178.50
ROOF
EL 201.00'
ROOF
EL 201.00'
ROOF
EL 206.00'
ROOF
EL 199.00'

PARKING
SPACE

PLANTING LEGEND
SymbolBotanical Name/Common Name Quantity Size
TREES
SHRUBS
Agave vilmoriniana / Octopus agave 6 5g L Alt. 15g
spacing per plan
Calamagrostis acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' / 44 5g M
Feather reed grass, @ 30" o.c.

Juncus patens / California gray rush 93 1g L
@ 18" o.c.

Romneya coulteri / Matilija poppy 24 5g VL
@ 48" o.c.

Salvia leucantha / Mexican sage 10 5g L
@ 30" o.c.

GROUND COVER
Arctostaphylos 'Emerald Carpet'/ Manzanita 19 1g L
field spaced
Bouteloua gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' 140 1g L
317 sf @ 18" o.c.

Carex divulsa / Berkeley sedge 15 flat L
720 sf @ 12" o.c. = 720 plants
Ceanothus griseus horizontalis 'Yankee Point' / 20 1g L Yankee Point, field spaced
Trachelospermum jasminoides / Star jasmine 4 flat M
160 sf @ 12" o.c. = 160 plants
Remarks
Geijera parviflora / Australian willow
WUCOLS
1 36" Box L

HYDROSEED MIX
Botanical Name/Common Name
(Lbs/Ac)
Lotus scoparius (Acmispon glaber) / Deerweed x
Eschscholzia californica / California poppy x
Mimulus (aurauntiacus) longiflorus / Sticky x
Monkeyflower
Lupinus perennis / Perennial Lupine x
Salvia apiana / White sage x
Asclepias fascicularis / Narrow-leaved milkweed x
Eriophyllum confertiflorum / Golden yarrow x
Pseudognaphalium californicum / California x
everlasting
Koeleria macrantha / June grass x
Gilia capitata / Globe gilia x
TOTAL SEED RATE: x
3,022 sf
Stover Seed Co.

PO Box 1579
9180 San Fernando Rd.

Sun Valley, CA
213-626-9668
Contact: Stephen Knutson
Seed Rate Remarks
Client:

Project location:

David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:

Date:

L A N D S C A P E

COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC

A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O

NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
1/8" = 1'-0"

LANDSCAPE PLAN
L-1.0
0'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
4' 8' 16'

EXISTING NATURAL TO REMAIN
PAVING

POOL ABOVE

LARGE BOULDER

PERMAVOID PLANTER
PER CIVIL ENG.
10/22/2024

PROPOSED FUTURE

SEEPAGE PIT

PROPOSED

SEEPAGE PIT
PROPOSED 2,500
GAL. SEPTIC TANK
-265 SF OF LANDSCAPE
+260 SF OF LANDSCAPE
+5 SF OF LANDSCAPE
2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 180 Client:

Project location:

David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:

Date:

L A N D S C A P E

COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC

A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O

NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
1/8" = 1'-0"

NOTES & DETAILS
L-1.1

GENERAL PLANTING NOTES

9. FOR BIDDING AREA TO BE LANDSCAPED, THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS SHALL BE USED UNTIL CONTRACTOR IS PROVIDED WITH SOILS AGRONOMY REPORT.

AMENDMENTS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY BROADCAST AND THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED BY MEANS OF A ROTOTILLER OR EQUAL.

AMOUNT PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET
4 CU. YDS. NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT

DERIVED FROM REDWOOD SAWDUST,
FIR SAWDUST OR CEDAR SAWDUST.
15 LBS. SOIL SULFUR
15 LBS. 12-12-12 FERTILIZER

10. A MINIMUM 3" (THREE INCHES) LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK MULCH SHALL BE

APPLIED ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL SURFACES OF PLANTING AREAS EXCEPT TURF

AREAS, CREEPING OR ROOTING GROUNDCOVERS, OR DIRECT SEEDING APPLICATIONS WHERE MULCH IS CONTRAINDICATED. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT 1/2 CU.

FT BAG AS SAMPLE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

11. THE PLANTING PITS FOR BOXED TREES SHALL BE EXCAVATED TWICE THE

DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL WITH A MAXIMUM OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROOTBALL TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PLANTING PIT.

DO NOT OVER EXCAVATE!!!

THE BACKFILL MIX FOR USE AROUND THE ROOTBALL OF ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING FORMULA:
6 PARTS ON-SITE SOIL
4 PARTS BY VOLUME ORGANIC AMENDMENT PER ABOVE SOIL

PREPARATION
1 LB./CU.YD. OF MIX 12-12-12 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER
2 LBS./CU. YD. OF MIX IRON SULFATE
10 LBS./CU. YD. OF MIX AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM

12. THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER INSTALLATION ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE FERTILIZED WITH BEST FERTILIZER COMPANY 16-6-8 OR APPROVED EQUAL, APPLIED AT THE RATE OF SIX POUNDS (6 LBS.) PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR PER SOIL AGRONOMY REPORT.

FERTILIZER APPLICATION SHALL BE CONTINUED THEREAFTER AT MONTHLY INTERVALS.

13. FOR ALL TREES, SEE DETAIL 1, THIS SHEET

14. FOR ALL SHRUBS, SEE DETAIL 2 & 3, THIS SHEET.

15. FERTILIZER TABLETS SHALL BE AGRIFORM, 21 GRAM TABLETS (20-10-5) IN QUANTITIES AS FOLLOWS:
1 GALLON SHRUBS 1
5 GALLON SHRUBS 3
15 GALLON SHRUBS 5
BOXED TREES 1 PER 4" OF BOX SIZE
PLACE TABLETS AT HALF THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL.

16. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS DISTURBED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION

PROCESS WILL BE RECONDITIONED TO THEIR ORIGINAL STATE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.

17. INSTALL 24" DEEP ROOT BARRIER ON ALL TREES WITHIN 4 FEET OF PAVING.

18. FOR SOILS LESS THAN 6% ORGANIC MATTER IN THE TOP 6" (SIX INCHES) OF SOIL, COMPOST AT A RATE OF A MINIMUM OF FOUR CUBIC YARDS PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET

OF PERMEABLE AREA SHALL BE INCORPORATED TO A DEPTH OF SIX INCHES INTO THE SOIL.

19. RECIRCULATING WATER SYSTEMS SHALL BE USED FOR WATER FEATURES.

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A QUALIFIED SUPERVISOR ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION THROUGH COMPLETION OF PICK-UP WORK.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES LISTED FOR CONVENIENCE OF CONTRACTOR. ACTUAL NUMBER OF SYMBOLS SHALL HAVE PRIORITY OVER QUANTITY DESIGNATED.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND PAY FOR ALL CONTAINER GROWN TREES,

SHRUBS AND VINES, INCLUDING SEEDED AND SODDED TURF, HYDROMULCHES AND FLATTED GROUNDCOVERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE AND PAY FOR: PLANTING OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS; THE SPECIFIED GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS; THE STAKING AND GUYING OF TREES AND THE CONTINUOUS PROTECTION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS UPON THEIR ARRIVAL AT THE SITE.

4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

5. ALL BOXED TREES IN PAVING SHALL BE SELECTED AND SPOTTED BY THE

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IN CONJUNCTION WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ASSUME ALL LIABILITY FOR ACCURATE PLACEMENT OF TREES.

6. ALL VINE RUNNERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NURSERY STAKES REMOVED AND VINE RUNNERS SHALL BE ESPALIERED TO THE ADJACENT WALL OR FENCE.

7. ALL SOIL PREPARATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER THE SOIL AGRONOMY REPORT TO BE PROVIDED AND PAID FOR BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR. THE REPORT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY FORWARDED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UPON COMPLETION.

8. THE SOIL AMENDMENTS SPECIFIED ARE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A SOILS AGRONOMY REPORT FROM WALLACE SOILS LABORATORY (310) 615-0116 AND/OR ANY ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATION

PROVIDED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS.

ALL GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLANTED AT EQUAL SPACING
12" (SHRUBS)
8" (GROUNDCOVER)

SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
(MAX.) AT
1/2 "EQUAL"

EDGE OF PLANTING AREA
NOTE:

TYPICAL PLANT, SPACING VARIESSPACING AT IRREGULAR EDGES EQUAL

SEE PLANT LEGEND AND PLANS
EQUAL
EQUAL
EQUAL
'INFILL' PLANT, AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN

BACKFILL

PLANT TABLETS PER SPECS

SCARIFY SUBGRADE
PLANTING PIT TO BE 2"

SHALLOWER THAN ROOTBALL

AT CENTER, BUT DEEPER

AROUND HOLE'S EDGES TO
PREVENT SETTLING. PIT TO

BE TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE
CONTAINER.

SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 2"

ABOVE FINISH GRADE
3" DEEP TAMPED EARTH WATER

BASIN AROUND SHRUB, FILL WITH
MULCH
MULCH

FINISH GRADE
EDGES

LODGEPOLE PINE
APPROVED MULCH.

FINISH
MIN.
12"
RECEIVE A 4" LAYER OF
3" BASIN IN LAWN
AREA 12" FROM TRUNK
6" BASIN IN G. COVER

MAINTAIN TURF FREE
NOTE: ALL PLANT BASINS SHALL
(SEE SPECS.)

FINISH GRADE

PUDDLE AND SETTLE

TO SET PLANT AT

PLANTING TABLETS

PLANTING BACKFILL
GRADE
MIN.
12"

TREE TIE
DETAIL

TREE TIE, NAIL TO STAKE

LODGEPOLE PINE STAKE

TREE TRUNK
(SEE SPECS.)

BACKFILL MIX
10 FT FOR 36" BOX

GALVANIZED NAILS

CINCH TIE, SECURED

TO STAKE WITH
STAKES, 2 PER TREE
12 FT FOR 48" BOX 12" ROOT3"
3" DRAIN CAP 1X

CAP W/GRAVEL PER

PLANTING PLAN

PVC PIPE & SLIP
3" PERFORATED
2 PER TREE
2X ROOTBALL

DO NOT EXCAVATE DEEPER THAN SOIL IN BOX

VERIFY SOIL DEPTH IN BOX PRIOR TO EXCAVATION BALL
TOP OF
3" ABOVE
FINISH

ROOT BALL
GRADE
05/24/2023
2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 181 185
180
190
175
185
190
192 198 196
194

Juncus patens / California gray rush 93 1g L
@ 18" o.c.

Romneya coulteri / Matilija poppy 24 5g VL
@ 48" o.c.

Salvia leucantha / Mexican sage 10 5g L
@ 30" o.c.

GROUND COVER
Arctostaphylos 'Emerald Carpet'/ Manzanita 19 1g L
field spaced
Bouteloua gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' 140 1g L
317 sf @ 18" o.c.

PO Box 1579
9180 San Fernando Rd.

Sun Valley, CA
213-626-9668
Contact: Stephen Knutson
Seed Rate Remarks
Client:

Project location:

David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:

Date:

L A N D S C A P E

COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC

A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O

NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
1" = 16'

FUEL MODIFICATION
PLAN
L-1.2
0'
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
8' 16' 32'
ZONE A

EMBER RESISTANT ZONE
ZONE B
ZONE C

MULTI-LEVEL NEW RESIDENCE
ZONE B
10/22/2024
ZONE A
2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 182

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION

CST COOL SEASON TURF

WST WARM SEASON TURF

HWUS HIGH WATER USING SHRUB/TREE

MWUS MEDIUM WATER USING SHRUB/TREE

LWUS LOW WATER USING SHRUB/TREE

VLWUS VERY LOW WATER USING SHRUB/TREE

HYDROZONE LEGEND

IRRIGATION LEGEND
MFG. MODEL NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION REMARKS
APPROVED PVC SCH. 40 LATERAL LINE; SEE PLAN FOR SIZE SEE DETAIL I APPROVED PVC SCH. 40 MAINLINE SLEEVE; 2 AT EACH LOCATION 2X THE DIA. OF PIPE TO BE SLEEVED SEE NOTES 1, 2 SYMBOL
M
A
FEBCO LF825-YA, 1" REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE SEE DETAIL D

APPROVED METER
HUNTER HQ-33DLRC, 3/4" QUICK COUPLER. SEE DETAIL C
HUNTER ICZ-101-40, 1" DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE (1" ICV FILTER SENTRY GLOBE W/1" HY100 FILTER+REGULATOR) SEE DETAIL B NIBCO APPROVED BRONZE 150 PSI RATED BALL VALVE; LINE SIZE IN VALVE BOX. SEE DETAIL C RAINBIRD XFD-09-12-xxx DRIPLINE W/ COPPER SHIELD EMITTERS; EMITTERS @12" O.C. & 12" ROW SPACING. SEE DETAIL H MV HUNTER ICV-101G, 1" MASTER CONTROL VALVE SEE DETAIL A HUNTER ICV-101G, 1" REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. SEE DETAIL A
APPROVED MAINLINE: 1) UNDER CONCRETE DECK (IN GARAGE) - TYPE L COPPER FOR SIZES 1-1/2" AND SMALLER SEE DETAIL I 2) INSIDE WALLS AND BETWEEN FLOORS (DECK PENETRATIONS) - TYPE K COPPER 3) BETWEEN WATER MAIN AND BACKFLOW - TYPE K COPPER
4) DOWNSTREAM FROM BACKFLOW - SCHEDULE 40 PVC BURIED IN SOIL SIZE 1 1/2" AND

SMALLER, SIZE NOTED

VALVE / CONTROLLER SEQUENCE --
--
-- GPM

VALVE SIZE
MWUS
DRIP

HYDROZONE TYPE

IRRIGATION TYPE
xx sf AREA
NETAFIM TL050-MFV AUTOMATIC FLUSH VALVE IN VALVE BOX AT LOW POINT. SEE DETAIL G RAINBIRD AR VALVE KIT; 1" AIR/ VACUUM RELIEF VALVE IN VALVE BOX AT HIGH POINT. SEE DETAIL G FS HUNTER HFS-FCT-100, 1" PVC FLOW SENSOR SEE DETAIL E

HUNTER ECO-ID DRIP SYSTEM INDICATOR SEE DETAIL J
xx in/hr
40 psi

APPLICATION RATE

DESIGN OPERATING PRESSURE
ECO
WATER MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE; 120 VAC POWER TO THE CONTROLLER LOCATION BY OTHERS.

HUNTER HC-1200i, FIXED 12 STN. INDOOR WALL MOUNT WIFI CONTROLLER W/ HYDRAWISE WEATHER BASED SEE DETAIL F GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES:

1. ALL MAINLINE PIPING AND CONTROL WIRES UNDER PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SEPARATE SLEEVES. ALL SLEEVING SIZES SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ALL SLEEVES SHALL BE AT A DEPTH OF 18" MINIMUM BELOW SUB GRADE.

2. ALL LATERAL LINE PIPING UNDER PAVING SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO PAVING.

THE PIPING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12" BELOW SUB GRADE.

3. PIPE SIZES SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF SMALLER PIPE SIZES SHALL BE PERMITTED BUT SUBSTITUTIONS OF LARGER SIZES MAY BE APPROVED. ALL DAMAGED AND REJECTED PIPE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE TIME OF THE REJECTION.

4. THE 120 VAC ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE AT THE CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION FROM THE SOURCE TO THE CONTROLLER OR AS ALLOWED BY LOCAL CODES.

5. ALL SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE SET PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED OR DIRECTED.

6. THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL PIPING, VALVES, OR OTHER SIMILAR APPURTENANCES SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN AND GRAPHIC CLARIFICATION AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN IRRIGATED PLANTING AREAS. WHEREVER POSSIBLE INSTALL ALL VALVES AND BOXES IN SHRUB AREAS AND NOT IN TURF AREAS.

7. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL GRADE DIFFERENCES, LOCATION OF WALLS, RETAINING WALLS, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES OF THE SITE. COORDINATE

WORK WITH OTHER TRADES AND CONTRACTORS FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE ALL ITEMS DAMAGED BY WORK PERFORMED.

8. DO NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE FIELD CONDITIONS VARY FROM

THE DRAWINGS AND THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES OR DIFFERENCES IN THE AREA DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT HAVE NOT BEEN INDICATED ON THE ENGINEERING. SUCH ITEMS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY NECESSARY REVISIONS IN THE EVENT THAT THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT HEEDED.

9. FLUSH AND ADJUST ALL SPRINKLER HEADS AND VALVES FOR THEIR OPTIMUM OPERATION.

10. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON A MINIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE OF 40 PSI AND A MAXIMUM FLOW DEMAND OF 17.4 GPM. VERIFY WATER PRESSURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN

THE WATER PRESSURE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND THE PRESSURE READING IN THE FIELD TO THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

11. ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT NOT OTHERWISE DETAILED OR SPECIFIED HEREIN SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

12. REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILED INFORMATION.

13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IN HIS BID FOR A ONE-YEAR (1-YEAR) MAINTENANCE PERIOD.

14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL MAINLINES IN LANDSCAPE AREAS AND NOT UNDER PAVING UNLESS IT IS A NECESSARY CROSSING OF A STREET OR WALK. THE MAINLINE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE DEPTH NOTED IN THE IRRIGATION DETAILS AND AT A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF 12"-24" FROM THE EDGE OF ALL CURBS OR WALKS. ALL MAINLINE AND VALVES SHALL BE LOCATED BEHIND THE PROPERTY LINE.

15. AUTOMATIC LANDSCAPE IRRIGATORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT DOESN'T SPRAY ON THE BUILDING.

GREEN BUILDING NOTES:

1. I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS.

2. PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICES ARE REQUIRED IF WATER PRESSURE IS BELOW OR EXCEEDS THE RECOMMENDED PRESSURE OF THE SPECIFIED IRRIGATION DEVICES.

3. AFTER INSTALLATION, INSTALLER TO PERFORM PRESSURE TESTING AND VERIFY WATER COVERAGE OF ENTIRE IRRIGATION SYSTEM.

INSTALLER SHALL ADJUST OR REPLACE ANY DEVICES TO ENSURE EFFICIENT, COMPLETE AND PROPER WORKING OF THE SYSTEM.

4. CHECK VALVES OR ANTI-DRAIN VALVES ARE REQUIRED ON ALL SPRINKLER HEADS WHERE LOW POINT DRAINAGE COULD OCCUR.

5. A DIAGRAM OF THE IRRIGATION PLAN SHOWING HYDROZONES SHALL BE KEPT WITH THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER FOR SUBSEQUENT MANAGEMENT PURPOSES.

6. THE CONTROLLER IS SHIPPED WITH A COMPLETE OPERATIONS MANUAL WHICH SHALL BE GIVEN TO OWNER OR KEPT ON SITE PER OWNER'S REQUEST.

7. A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION SHALL BE FILLED OUT AND CERTIFIED BY EITHER THE DESIGNER OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, IRRIGATION PLANS OR THE LICENSED LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PROJECT.

8. AN IRRIGATION AUDIT REPORT SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION.

A-1 Drip-M

HYDROZONES
A-2 Drip-M
A-3 Drip-M
A-4 Drip-M
POOL/SPA Drip-H
A-6 Spray-L
A-7 Spray-L
A-8 Spray-L
A-5 Drip-M
A-9 Spray-L
PRESSURE @ POC
HIGH = x psi
LOW = x psi

STATIC WATER

IRRIGATION SPRAY HEAD LEGEND
SYMBOL MFG. MODEL NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION P.S.I. G.P.M. RADIUS NOZZLE REMARKS HUNTER 12" SHRUB RISER W/MPR, 90° 40 .21 14 FT MP-1000 MAROON SEE DETAIL L HUNTER 12" SHRUB RISER W/MPR, 180° 40 .42 14 FT MP-1000 MAROON SEE DETAIL L HUNTER 12" SHRUB RISER W/MPR, 360° 40 .84 14 FT MP-1000 OLIVE SEE DETAIL L 185
180
190
175
185
190
192 198 196
194
DRIP
MWUS
1"
A-1

17.3 1.44 in/hr
40 psi
1,153 sf
DRIP
LWUS
1"
A-3

9.6 1.44 in/hr
40 psi
641 sf
SPRAY
LWUS
1"
A-8

3.4 40 psi
1008 sf
SPRAY
LWUS
1"
A-7

6.7 0.41 in/hr
40 psi
1338 sf
SPRAY
LWUS
1"
A-6

3.4 40 psi
676 sf
DRIP
MWUS
1"
A-2

5.0 1.44 in/hr
40 psi
335 sf
DRIP
LWUS
1"
A-4

3.7 1.44 in/hr
40 psi
244 sf
DRIP
LWUS
1"
A-5

4.0 1.44 in/hr
40 psi
267 sf

LOCATE ON SITE PER LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT & OWNER. 110V BY
OTHERS

AT LOCATION OF CONTROLLER,
PROVIDE 3/4" CONDUIT TO ROOF

FOR SOLAR SYNC IRRIGATION

CONTROL WIRE
A

PROVIDE A DEDICATED

LANDSCAPE WATER METER
AS REQUIRED BY MWELO.

INSTALL PER

MANUFACTURER SPECS

MINIMUM DISTANCE AND

PIPE REQUIREMENTS

0.41 in/hr

0.41 in/hr
POOL

NEW RESIDENCE
ECO
ECO
ECO
ECO
ECO
NOTE:

FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES ONLY.

INSTALL ALL MAINLINE AND ALL VALVES
ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. NO MAINLINES

OR IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IN PUBLIC

RIGHT OF WAY OR NEIGHBORING
PROPERTY.

M MV FS
Client:

Project location:

David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:

Date:

L A N D S C A P E

COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC

A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O

NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25

IRRIGATION PLAN
L-2.0
1/8" = 1'-0"
0'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
4' 8' 16'
10/22/2024
2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 183 Client:

Project location:

David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:

Date:

L A N D S C A P E

COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC

A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O

NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE +
MWELO
L-2.1
1/8" = 1'-0"
10/22/2024
2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 184 PVC SCH. 80 SxSxT TEE.
3" PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE.

PVC SCH. 80 TxT ELL.

PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE. LENGTH AS REQ.

PVC SCH. 80 TxT ELL.
3" PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE.

BRASS TxT ELL.
10" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH
"Q.C." EMBOSSED INTO LID (2" MIN. HIGH). 1" 18"
PVC MAINLINE. 3"

QUICK COUPLER

FINISH GRADE

ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING

COVER BY AMETEK OR APPROVED EQUAL
BRANDED W/ "GATE VALVE"

PVC MALE ADAPTOR
VALVE BOX EXTENSION; LENGTH AS REQUIRED
BALL VALVE; LINE SIZE
BALL VALVE 1" 18" MIN.

PVC MAINLINE.
3/4" Ø PEA GRAVEL; 1 CUBIC FT. MIN.

BALL VALVE

ET IRRIGATION CONTROLLER
WALL
NOTE: FOR AUTOMATIC CONTROLLERS WITH INTERNAL TRANSFORMERS, PLUG 120 VOLT POWER CORD DIRECTLY INTO CONVENIENCE OUTLET.

FLOOR
POWER CORD WITH 3-PRONGED
PLUG TRANSFORMER.

CONDUIT OUTLET BODY
JUNCTION BOX. SIZE AS
REQUIRED.

CONTROL WIRING

TO ELECTRIC

CONTROL
VALVES.

P.V.C. CONDUIT - SIZE AS
NOTED.

HOLE THROUGH

WALL FOR

CONDUIT SHALL

BE PROVIDED BY
CONTRACTOR.

SEAL AND WATER

PROOF AS
REQUIRED.
120 VOLT

CONVENIENCE

OUTLET FOR ET

IRRIGATION
CONTROLLER.

SERVICE LINE FROM P.O.C.

FINISH GRADE

PVC MAINLINE TO SYSTEMS

BRASS ELLS
PVC MALE ADAPTORS (2)
6" MIN. THICK CONCRETE PAD;
SLOPE MIN. 1/4" PER FOOT

BRASS UNION
BRASS NIPPLES TYPICAL; LENGTH

AS REQUIRED
WILKINS # YB " WYE " STRAINER
W/20 MESH SCREEN; LINE SIZE
BACKFLOW DEVICE PER PLANS;

INSTALL PER LOCAL CODE

ALL-SPEC BACKFLOW

ENCLOSURE WITH LOCK PER
PLANS; PAINTED FOREST
GREEN. INSTALL PER MFG'S

SPECIFICATIONS
3"MIN.
12" MIN.
4"
MIN.
2" MIN.
18" MIN.
24" MIN.

PROVIDE A 20" LOOP

IN WIRE AT ALL

CHANGES OF

DIRECTION
GREATER THAN 30'.

REMOVE TIES

AFTER ALL

CONNECTIONS HAVE
BEEN MADE.

INSTALL ALL
120 VOLT

WIRE IN

CONDUIT PER
LOCAL CODE.

SNAKE ALL PLASTIC PIPE

INTO TRENCHES
AS SHOWN.

ALL MAINLINE

SHALL BE

INSTALLED PER
MFG'S.

SPECIFICATIONS.

TAPE AND BUNDLE
WIRING AT 10 FT.

O.C. MAXIMUM.

MAIN SUPPLY,

LATERAL AND
WIRING
MAIN SUPPLY LATERAL 120 VOLT WIRING

LATERAL

MAINLINE
PER
LOCAL
CODE 18" * 12"
*
* 2 1/2" AND SMALLER: 18"
3" AND LARGER: 24" 12"
.

WIRING

FINISH GRADE
NETAFIM TL050 (3/4" FPT)

AUTOMATIC FLUSH VALVE
PVC SCH 40 3/4" MPT x 1/2"

SLIP REDUCING MALE

ADDAPTOR

FLEXIBLE PVC DRIP TUBING
3/4" Ø CRUSHED ROCK;
2 CU. FT. MIN.

PVC PIPE

PVC DRIP FLEX HOUSE OR

LATERAL
PVC SCH 80 ELL.

RAINBIRD AR AIR/VACUUM
RELIEF VALVE PVC SCH 80

REDUCER COUPLING
FINISH GRADE 12" 1" 3"

FLUSH VALVE

DRIP AIR-VACCUM RELIEF VALVE
10"Ø ROUND VALVE BOX
W/ LOCKING COVER.

BRAND "ARV" ON LID
SALCO DAS-8 ACCESS
SLEEVE. FROM EDGE OF PLANTING OR PAVING PER PLAN 6"

PER PLAN

FROM CONTROL VALVE
MANIFOLD; SEE CONTROL VALVE
DETAIL
PVC SCH 40 ELL, TYPICAL
LANDSCAPE DRIPLINE; INSTALL 2"-3"

BELOW FINISH GRADE

COMPRESSION ADAPTER, TYPICAL

VALVE DETAIL
PVC SCH 40 TEE, TYPICAL

FLUSH VALVE - FARTHEST FROM
VALVE @ LOWEST POINT, SEE

FLUSH VALVE DETAIL

FROM EDGE OF PLANTING OR
6" PAVING PVC RETURN HEADER
PVC SUPPLY HEADER. 3"

AIR RELIEF VALVE -

FARTHEST FROM VALVE
@ HIGHEST POINT, SEE

AIR RELIEF VALVE DTL
5X PIPE
DIA. MINIMUM
10X PIPE
DIA. MINIMUM
5 2" IN SHRUB
1" IN TURF
4 3
7 6
2 1
LEGEND

1. PLASTIC VALVE BOX W/

EXTENSIONS AS NECESSARY

AND LOCKING COVER

2. FINISH GRADE

3. WATERPROOF CONNECTION; 3M
SERIES 3500 SCOTCH-LOK OR
EQUAL.

4. TWO CONDUCTOR SHIELDED

CABLE- ROUTE TO CONTROLLER
VIA. CONDUIT.

5. FLOW SENSOR PER PLAN.

6. VALVE BOX EXTENSION.

7. PEA GRAVEL DRAIN SUMP; 30"
DIA. X 6" DEEP MIN.

FLOW FLOW
PVC SCH. 80 UNION.

DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SEE
LEGEND.

PVC SCH. 80 TEE FOR REGULATOR BYPASS.

USE ONLY WHERE SLOPE EXCEEDS 35' IN
HEIGHT.

PVC SCH. 80 STREET ELL. MALE ADAPTOR &
PVC CL 200 LATERAL FOR REGULATOR
BYPASS. USE ONLY WHERE SLOPE EXCEEDS
35' IN HEIGHT.

SALCO SR 40-32 REGULATOR.

PVC SCH. 80 MALE ADAPTOR.
"JUMBO" RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX
WITH LID; BRAND LID W/ VALVE NUMBER
AND "RCV".

PVC SCH. 80 ELL.

PVC MAINLINE.

PVC SCH. 80 BALL VALVE.

SALCO HYSF-100 FILTER W/ 120
MESH SCREEN.

PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE. TYPICAL.
3/4" Ø CRUSHED ROCK, 3 CU.FT.

PVC SCH. 80 ELLS (2).

PVC MAINLINE.

LABEL VALVE CONTROLLER ID # W/ PLASTIC

TAG ON VALVE AND ON VALVE BOX COVER
1 2
3 4
5 1
2 LEGEND:

ECO INDICATOR
3 4 PVC LATERAL PIPE

FINISHED GRADE

ADJACENT MULCH
5 SWING JOINT
Client:

Project location:

David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:

Date:

L A N D S C A P E

COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC

A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O

NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25

IRRIGATION DETAILS
L-2.2

B DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE C QUICK COUPLER & BALL/GATE VALVE D REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE

F WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER G FLUSH VALVE & AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE H DRIP TUBING INSTALLATION

I PIPING & WIRING

E FLOW SENSOR

A MASTER CONTROL / SPRAY CONTROL VALVE

J ECO-ID INDICATOR K PGP ON SLOPE - NOT USED L MP ROTATOR 1/8" = 1'-0"
05/24/2023
2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 2024-10-22 Heathercliff CD Set 185 City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Road • Malibu, California 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 • Fax (310) 456-3356 • www.malibucity.org

GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW SHEET
Project Information
Date: October 25, 2024 Review Log #: 4615
Site Address: 29329 Heathercliff Road
Lot/Tract/PM #: n/a Planning #: CDP 20-003
Applicant/Contact: Alan Hajjar, [email protected] BPC/GPC #:

Contact Phone #: 818-383-1800 Fax #: Planner: Allison Cook Project Type: New one-story single-family residence with basement, OWTS Submittal Information
Consultant(s) / Report
Date(s):
(Current submittal(s) in Bold.)
Leighton & Associates, Inc. (Geoffrey F., CEG 2512; Hennessey, R., RCE 86902): 10-23-24, 11-30-23, 10-27-23, 9-10-23, 9-3-2020, 3-12- 20, 11-27-2019
Architectural Plans by David Kellen & Associates, Inc., dated September 21, 2023, March 19, 2023, January 9, 2020.

Preliminary Grading Plan by Planex Associates dated March 21, 2023, July 17, 2023, December 12, 2019.

Topography Survey by Elias Chaij, Survey date: May 29, 2019.

Previous Reviews: 12-12-23, 11-16-23, 10-9-2023, 9-10-20, 8-18-2020, 1-29-2020; Review Findings
Coastal Development Permit Review
The residential development project is APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective.

The residential development project is NOT APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective. The listed ‘Review Comments’ shall be addressed prior to approval.

Building Plan-Check Stage Review
Awaiting Building plan check submittal. Please respond to the listed ‘Building Plan-Check Stage Review Comments’ AND review and incorporate the attached ‘Geotechnical Notes for Building Plan Check’ into the plans.

APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective. Please review the attached ‘Geotechnical Notes for Building Plan Check’ and incorporate into Building Plan-Check submittals.

NOT APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective. The listed ‘Building Plan-Check Stage Review Comments’ shall be addressed prior to Building Plan-Check Stage approval.

Remarks
The referenced geotechnical reports and plans were reviewed by the City from a geotechnical perspective.

Based on the submitted information, the project includes the construction of a new single-family residence with basement, and a new Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS). Grading consists of 230 yards of R 186
City of Malibu Geotechnical Review Sheet
(MAL6060) – 2 –
& R; 1015 yards of cut and one yard of fill under the structure; 58 yards of fill for safety; 675 yards of cut and zero yards of fill non- exempt; and 624 yards of export. We understand that a revised plan is currently proposed that includes minor changes relative to the previous plan. Changes include additional stairs, a landing, and a change in retaining wall alignment.

Building Plan Check Review Comments:

1. Please submit a fee of $ 1,179.00 to City geotechnical staff for building plan check review.

2. The consultant should evaluate the potential for interaction (example: lateral surcharge) between the closely located retaining walls and between the basement sidewalls and adjacent foundations/structures.

Using the 1:1 criterion for lateral surcharge is not acceptable for lateral surcharge unless substantiated by analyses and/or references. Footings below a 1:1 plane behind walls could laterally surcharge the walls.

Lateral surcharge behind any proposed retaining walls needsto be evaluated using an appropriate method (e.g.: 1- Spangler & Handy {1982}, Soil Engineering, fourth Edition, Harper & Row, New York; 2- Navy Design Manual NAVFAC DM-7.2, Figures 11 & 12).

3. Section 7.4 of the City’s geotechnical guidelines requires a minimum thickness of 10 mils for vapor barriers beneath slabs-on-grade. The Project Geotechnical Engineer has recommended that the vapor barrier be a minimum thickness of 15 mils, conform to ASTM E1745 Class A requirements, and be installed in accordance with ASTM E1643. Building plans shall reflect the Consultant’s recommendation.

4. The following notes must be added to the grading plan:
a. The geotechnical consultant should determine the expansion potential of the finish grade materials at the completion of grading. Foundation design recommendations should be revised if the expansion potential of finish grade materials substantially differs from the assumed expansion range. b. At the completion of grading, samples of the onsite soils should be collected and tested for corrosion potential. Final recommendations for mitigation measures including cement type should be based on the corrosion potential of the finish grade materials.
c. The geotechnical consultant should determine at the completion of grading the R-value of the finish grade materials within parking and access road areas. Final pavement design should be based on the actual R-value of the finish grade materials.

5. An as-built report shall be submitted to the City for review. This report prepared by the Geotechnical Consultant must include the results of all compaction tests as well as a map depicting the limits of fill, locations and elevations of all density tests, outline and elevations of all removal bottoms, keyway locations and bottom elevations, locations of all subdrains and flow line elevations, and location and elevation of all retaining wall backdrains and outlets. Geologic conditions exposed during grading must be depicted on an as-built geologic map.

6. Two sets of final Grading, Retaining Wall, Swimming Pool/Spas, Guest House, and Residence plans (APPROVED BY BUILDING AND SAFETY) incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations and items in this review sheet must be reviewed and wet stamped and manually signed by the Project Engineering Geologist and Project Geotechnical Engineer. City geotechnical staff will review the plans for conformance with the Project Geotechnical Consultants’ recommendations and items in this review sheet over the counter at City Hall. Appointments for final review and approval of the plans may be made by calling or emailing City Geotechnical staff. 187
City of Malibu Geotechnical Review Sheet
(MAL6060) – 3 –
Please direct questions regarding this review sheet to City Geotechnical staff listed below.

Engineering Geology Review by: 10/25/2024
Christopher Sexton, C.E.G. #1441, Exp. 11-30-24 Date
Engineering Geology Reviewer (805-496-1222)
Email: [email protected]
Geotechnical Engineering Review by: _______________________________ 10/25/2024 Ali Abdel-Haq, G.E. #2308, Exp. 12-31-25 Date
Geotechnical Engineering Reviewer (805-496-1222)
Email: [email protected]
This review sheet was prepared by representatives of Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc. and GeoDynamics, Inc., contracted through Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc., as an agent of the City of Malibu.

188
City of Malibu
– GEOTECHNICAL –

NOTES FOR BUILDING PLAN-CHECK
The following standard items should be incorporated into Building Plan-Check submittals, as appropriate:

1. One set of grading, retaining wall, swimming pool and spas, guest house, and residence plans, incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations and items in this review sheet, must be submitted to City geotechnical staff for review. Additional review comments may be raised at that time that may require a response.

2. Show the name, address, and phone number of the Project Geotechnical Consultant(s) on the cover sheet of the Building, Seawall, and Grading Plans.

3. Include the following note on Grading and Foundation Plans: “Subgrade soils shall be tested for Expansion Index prior to pouring footings or slabs; Foundation Plans shall be reviewed and revised by the Project Geotechnical Consultant, as appropriate.”

4. Include the following note on the Foundation Plans: “All foundation excavations must be observed and approved by the Project Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of reinforcing steel.”

5. The Foundation Plans for the proposed project shall clearly depict the embedment material and minimum depth of embedment for the foundations in accordance with the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations.

6. Show the onsite wastewater treatment system on the Site Plan.

7. Please contact the Building and Safety Department regarding the submittal requirements for a grading and drainage plan review.

8. A comprehensive Site Drainage Plan, incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations, shall be included in the Plans. Show all area drains, outlets, and non-erosive drainage devices on the Plans. Water shall not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over descending slopes.

Grading Plans (as Applicable)

1. Grading Plans shall clearly depict the limits and depths of overexcavation, as applicable.

2. Prior to final approval of the project, an as-built compaction report prepared by the Project Geotechnical Consultant must be submitted to the City for review. The report must include the results of all density tests as well as a map depicting the limits of fill, locations of all density tests, locations and elevations of all removal bottoms, locations and elevations of all keyways and back drains, and locations and elevations of all retaining wall backdrains and outlets.

Geologic conditions exposed during grading must be depicted on an as-built geologic map. This comment must be included as a note on the grading plans.

Retaining Walls (As Applicable)

1. Show retaining wall backdrain and backfill design, as recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant, on the Plans.

2. Retaining walls separate from a residence require separate permits. Contact the Building and Safety Department for permit information. One set of retaining wall plans shall be submitted to the City for review by City geotechnical staff. Additional concerns may be raised at that time which may require a response by the Project Geotechnical Consultant and applicant.
189

Page 1 of 1 ends

Supplemental
Commission Agenda Report
To: Chair Leonard and Members of the Planning Commission Prepared by: Allison Cook, AICP, Contract Planner
Reviewed by: Salvador Lopez Jr., Interim Assistant Planning Director Approved by: Maureen Tamuri, AIA, AICP, Interim Planning Director Date prepared: October 4, 2024 Meeting date: October 7, 2024 Subject: Coastal Development Permit No. 20-003 and Minor Modification No. 20-001 – An application for a new two-story single-family residence and associated development
Location: 29329 Heathercliff Road, not within the appealable coastal zone
APN: 4468-011-011
Owner: ACS International, LLC
RECOMMENDAITON: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-64 determining the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, and approving Coastal Development Permit No. 20-003 to construct a new 4,050 square-foot, two-story, split-level single-family residence of 18 feet tall, with an attached 390 squarefoot garage, a swimming pool, landscaping, hardscape, retaining walls, grading, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system, including Minor Modification No. 20-001 for up to a 50 percent reduction in the front yard setback, located in the Rural Residential, One-Acre zoning district at 29329 Heathercliff Road (ACS International, LLC).

DISCUSSION: After the distribution of the agenda report, staff noticed that correspondence previously received by staff was inadvertently omitted from the report. As such, the correspondence is attached to this report for the Commission’s consideration.

ATTACHMENT: Public Correspondence
Planning Commission
Meeting
10-07-24
Item

5.A.
190

EXHIBIT D
191
192
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:16 AM Allison Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi - He needs to submit revised plan sheets showing the maximum 18' height.

Please note that I will be out of the office from 4/10 through 4/15.

Allison Cook, AICP
Owner, Capstone City Planning
Contract Planner to the City of Malibu
[email protected]

On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:11 AM Mike Kasaba > wrote:

Hi Allison,
Now that the SPR has been removed from this application, what are the next steps? Does Alan have to submit an updated plan or is the package ready for approval without any other submissions?
Mike Kasaba

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024, 9:06 AM Allison Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

You are welcome. Have a nice weekend.

Please note that I will be out of the office from 4/10 through 4/15. 193
Allison Cook, AICP
Owner, Capstone City Planning
Contract Planner to the City of Malibu
[email protected]

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:03 AM Mike Kasaba < > wrote:

Hi Allison,
Thank you for follow-through on this for me. I appreciate your diligence.

Mike Kasaba

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 8:57 AM Allison Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Mike - As you requested, I'm letting you know that the applicant submitted a request to remove the SPR request from his application, as he will now not be exceeding the maximum allowed building height of 18 feet. Thank you.

Please note that I will be out of the office from 4/10 through 4/15.

Allison Cook, AICP
Owner, Capstone City Planning
Contract Planner to the City of Malibu
194
[email protected]
195
From: Marc Provissiero
To: Planning Commission; Richard Mollica
Subject: 29329 Heathercliff Rd - application for Permit - Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 2:15:09 PM
To: Richard Mollica, Planning Commission
RE: 29329 Heathercliff Rd - Coastal Development Permit NO 20-003 / 20-002 Hello,
I received a notice by mail yesterday as I own property within the distribution radius regarding this proposed development.

I adamantly oppose this development for two reasons:

1. Scenic beauty - As a homeowner, I am against compromising the beautiful view driving up PCH on this stretch of land. Currently it's all natural greenscape. This development would disrupt natural greenscape that benefits the many with a blighted eyesore that benefits the one, turning the natural space into an arresting hillside edifice. Let's hold the line. No development on this stretch of Heathercliff that will degrade the beauty of that natural greenscape.

2. Erosion: The hillside in this region is unstable. There was a mudslide that damaged the commercial space on PCH one property west of this proposed development just months ago.

Hillside erosion endangers the condos 4 lots east of this site. That site will incur massive costs to shore up that hill. We don't need more development on this hillside. We don't want it.

Thank you for considering the comments and concerns.

Marc Provissiero
Owner
Heathercliff
196
1 Patricia Salazar
Subject: FW: 29329 Heathercliff Road - Case No. CDP 20-003 - Application Deemed Complete Letter Attachments: 29259 Heathercliff Rd - View Obstruction.jpg ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Mike Kasaba
Date: Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff Road - Case No. CDP 20-003 - Application Deemed Complete Letter To: Allison Cook <[email protected]>
Hi Allison,
Today the story poles were erected for this application CDP 20-003. The planned construction directly obstructs our views of the coastline, beach, and white water (see attached photo). This violates our Primary View Determination (PVD No 23-016) and we intend to block its approval by all lawful means. Please respond with the necessary steps we need to take to formally object in writing.

Thank you,
Mike Kasaba
197
198
1 Patricia Salazar
Subject: FW: 22-244 Neighbor Slope Study
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Heather Roth
Date: Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 9:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: 22-244 Neighbor Slope Study
To: Allison Cook <[email protected]>, Tyler Eaton <[email protected]> Cc: Larry Roth
Good MorningHope you are both well. I do have one question now Allison. We had a slope study done by a local firm and the Developer's study seems to be inconsistent with what we had done. Further, it seems they are doing a lot of grading in an area that has a large slope gradient. Specifically, the slope where driveway area is. It looks like this slope is over 25% visually and according to the slope study we had done. Is this allowed? Thanks in advance!
Best,
Heather Roth

199
200
201
202
1 Patricia Salazar
Subject: FW: File appeal regarding CDP-20-003
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Rebecca Evans <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 6:08 PM
Subject: RE: File appeal regarding CDP-20-003
To: Mike Kasaba
Cc: Allison Cook <[email protected]>, Analise Nash <[email protected]> Mike,
Allison Cook is the case planner for this project and is the best person to direct concerns to. Staff require applicants to provide an affidavit of property posting to provide information in advance of legal noticing for a proposed development and I believe that is what you are seeing at the site. From my quick review, it does not appear that the proposed development is ready for noticing yet (postcards and/or newspaper legal notice). However, I have added you as an interested property so that you will receive an email notification in addition to the postcards delivered within the radius map when the item nears a hearing or administrative decision. I also spoke with Allison’s team lead and they have discussed the importance of considering neighboring primary view determinations. Applicants requesting an SPR for height are also required to erect story poles to help neighbors visualize potential impacts prior to noticing and I don’t see a story pole certification in the database yet.

Appeals cannot be filed until a decision on the project is made either by the Planning Commission (if processed as a Coastal Development Permit) or by the Planning Director (if processed as an Administrative Coastal Development Permit). Items heard by the Planning Commission have a 10-day appeal window, which begins with day 1 as the day following the meeting where the development was approved.

I am sending Allison Cook a copy of your concerns as well. The case planner has a better idea of when this may be tentatively scheduled for a hearing.

Regards,
Rebecca Evans | Sr. Administrative Analyst | Planning Department 23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu CA, 90265
(310) 456-2489 extension 246
From: Mike Kasaba
Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 5:04 PM
To: Rebecca Evans <[email protected]>
Subject: File appeal regarding CDP-20-003
Hi Rebecca,
203
2 I sent an email on July 26th regarding a sign on the fence at 29329 Heathercliff Rd. I have received email responses from Allison Cook and a call from Analise. I am sending this message to you as directed by Analise (no last name given).

The public notice of this application was posted within the last month or so. I am lucky that I noticed it since the notice is obscured from public view down a narrow pathway and is set back from the street by more than 50 ft. Also, I have received no notice of this permit application in my physical mail.

The application for permit states that the application is for a structure taller than 18ft. This will severely impact our ocean view as specified in our Primary View Determination No. 22-004. According to Analise, I am supposed to contact you to file an 'Appeal'. Please let me know what steps are necessary to complete this filing so that my opposition to this permit is official. Also, please provide a current status of this application and the steps for its approval.

Sincerely,
Michael E Kasaba
Owner
Heathercliff Rd, Malibu, CA 90265
204
1 Patricia Salazar
Subject: FW: Fw: opposition to application for permit CDP 20-003 Attachments: PVD 22-004 PRIMARY VIEW DETERMINATION.pdf
From: Mike Kasaba
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 3:48 PM
To: malibu planning <[email protected]>
Subject: opposition to application for permit CDP 20-003

Hello,
Please accept this email as my opposition to permit 20-003. As per the application notice (attached), it states that the structure will exceed 18 ft. This will directly impact my view which has been registered with the city under the Primary View Determination No. 22-004 (attached).

205
2 Please confirm receipt of this email and my opposition to this permit. Please advise on what other steps I need to take in order to oppose any construction above 18ft.

Mike Kasaba
206
207
2 Pursuant to Malibu Municipal Code Section 17.45.050, staff captured the primary view from an elevation of five feet, standing on a wood deck, ten feet from the residence’s primary living area, verified as being a living room by staff. The following exhibits are provided to confirm that the chosen observation point complies with the municipal code section. (Exhibit 2) Exhibit 2A: The primary view
was documented from a height of
five feet from the deck surface
(Source: Staff photo, 7/8/2022)
Exhibit 2B and 2C: The primary
view was documented from an
exterior location, ten feet from a
primary living area (Source: Staff
Photo, 7/8/2022)
2A 2B
2C
208
209
4 View 1: Looking
South
(Source: Staff Photo,
7/8/2022)
View 2: Looking
Southwest
(Source: Staff Photo,
7/8/2022)
210
5 View 4: Looking
Northwest
(Source: Staff Photo,
7/8/2022)
View 3: Looking
West
(Source: Staff Photo,
7/8/2022)
211
6 View 5: Looking
North
(Source: Staff Photo,
7/8/2022)
212
213
1 Patricia Salazar
Subject: FW: 29329 Heathercliff Road - New Single Family Home Proposal ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Larry Roth
Date: Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff Road - New Single Family Home Proposal To: Allison Cook <[email protected]>, Heather Roth Hi Allison,
Thank you so much for your quick response. My wife and I do have concerns about such a large project on the hillside below us. I am currently in the air on my way to New York for the week. I am back on Thursday evening. Can we set a time to chat early next week? Is that too late? If we need to do it sooner I can try to make it happen. If we can do it next week please let me know a day/time that works for you for a call. Thanks!
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:23 AM Allison Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

Good Morning Mr. Roth:

I am the City of Malibu case planner on this project noted above. I understand you have some concerns, and I would like to learn more about them. Are you able to see the proposed project plans on OnBase? I am aware that you have a PVD and am reviewing how the proposed project might affect PVDs in the area. I am currently preparing the staff report for the Administrative Coastal Development Permit. The Administrative Coastal Development Permit is something that the Planning Director can approve, and interested parties and neighboring properties are provided public notice on the upcoming decision prior to the Director making a determination. The applicant will also be required to put up story poles to indicate the size and mass of the proposed building prior to the Director making a decision on the project. If you would like to set up a time to talk on the phone, I am happy to do so. Thank you. -Allison Cook
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Roth
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2023 10:25 AM
To: Tyler Eaton <[email protected]>; Heather Roth < Brian Adams Subject: CDP 20-003
Hi Tyler
Hope you had a nice weekend.

I’m not sure if you are associated with CDP 20-003 but thought I would reach out to you anyway. Maybe 214
215

Page 1 of 23 ends

5 Commission Agenda Report

To: Chair Leonard and Members of the Planning Commission Prepared by: Allison Cook, AICP, Contract Planner
Approved by: Maureen Tamuri, AIA, AICP, Interim Planning Director Reviewed by: Salvador Lopez Jr., Interim Assistant Planning Director Date prepared: September 26, 2024 Meeting date: October 7, 2024 Subject: Coastal Development Permit No. 20-003 and Minor Modification No. 20-001 – An application for a new two-story single-family residence and associated development
Location: 29329 Heathercliff Road, not within the appealable coastal zone
APN: 4468-011-011
Owner: ACS International, LLC
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-64 (Attachment 1) determining the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and approving Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 20-003 to construct a new 4,050 square-foot, two-story, split-level single-family residence of 18 feet tall, with an attached 390 square-foot garage, a swimming pool, landscaping, hardscape, retaining walls, grading, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), including Minor Modification (MM) No. 20-001 for up to a 50 percent reduction in the front yard setback, located in the Rural Residential, One-Acre (RR-1) zoning district at 29329 Heathercliff Road (ACS International, LLC).

DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the Malibu Local Coastal Program (LCP) Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Section 13.13.1, the Planning Director may process this permit application administratively, as an administrative coastal development permit, because the scope of work is for a single-family residence and associated development, and the permit is not appealable to the California Coastal Commission (CCC). This application was originally filed as an administrative coastal development permit (ACDP). The application was approved by the Planning Director on May 28, 2024. However, after considering public comments received by the Planning Director on the ACDP, and reporting the matter to the Planning Commission
Meeting
10-07-24
Item

5.A.
216

Page 2 of 23 ends

Planning Commission on June 3, 2024, the applicant requested that the application be processed as a regular CDP requiring a public hearing.

This agenda report provides a project overview, summary of surrounding land uses and project setting, the specific project scope of work, analysis of the project’s consistency with applicable LCP and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC) provisions, and environmental review pursuant to CEQA. The analysis and findings contained herein demonstrate the project is consistent with the LCP and MMC.

Project Overview
The vacant project site is 33,532 square feet in size (0.76 acre) and is a rectangularlyshaped, non-beachfront lot. The site contains vegetation with slopes that descend westerly, down to Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). An access easement connects the parcel to Heathercliff Road.

The project includes a split-level design that descends westerly with taller portions of the structure up to 18 feet in height sited on the eastern portion of the residence near Heathercliff Drive. The project faces west toward the descending slope. Hillside Residential Development standards established in MMC Sections 17.40.040(A)(20) and

17.62.070 do not apply to this project as the project is not sited on slopes steeper than 30 percent, and therefore, does not meet the definition of hillside development pursuant to MMC Section 17.02.0601. The project plans are included as Attachment 2, and the site plan is shown in Figure 2.

The applicant has requested MM No. 20-001 to reduce the required front yard setback from 59.4 feet to 29.6 feet, a reduction of just under 50 percent. The applicant is requesting a reduced front yard setback to allow the residential structure to be sited closer to Heathercliff Road on the east side of the property. This will avoid steeper slopes and natural vegetation on the western part of the property.

The applicant originally requested a site plan review (SPR) to increase the building height from the maximum allowed 18 feet to 21.5 feet. Story poles were installed depicting the maximum height of 21.5 feet. However, upon discussions with neighboring residents, including those with Primary View Determinations (PVDs) who were concerned about the potential for view obstructions due to the project, the applicant subsequently withdrew the request for an SPR and submitted revised plans indicating a maximum building height of 18 feet. Correspondence from one of the neighboring residents is included as Attachment

8. Photos of the story poles, including those as viewed from the PVDs of neighboring residences, are shown in Attachment 6.
1 Pursuant to MMC Section 17.02.060, “Hillside residential development” means a residential development occurring on a parcel of land on the inland side of Pacific Coast highway on a proposed development area located on slopes over thirty percent and which will result in grading on slopes over 30 percent. 217

Page 3 of 23 ends

Figure 1 –Aerial Map
Source: City GIS, 2024
Project Site
218

Page 4 of 23 ends

Figure 2 – Proposed Site Plan
Source: Plan provided by the applicant on March 12, 2024

219

Page 5 of 23 ends

Below is a summary of the public correspondence received on the subject application.

Public correspondence is provided as Attachment 8.

Front Yard Setback Minor Modification
An MM to reduce the required front yard setback from 59.4 feet to 29.6 feet is being requested. The applicant proposes to locate the residence on the flattest part of the site to avoid areas with slopes 4 to 1 and steeper. Shifting the building closer to the front property line and closer to other residences along Heathercliff Road is consistent with the existing pattern of development in the neighborhood. The residential structure and associated development meet the LIP’s total development square feet (TDSF) allowance. LIP Section

3.6(F)(5) states that modifications to required yards/setbacks standards shall be permitted where necessary to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive resources. The MM will enable the project to avoid the sensitive resource of slopes steeper than 4 to 1 in the Point Dume area (Land Use Plan (LUP Policy 3.35 and LIP Section 4.6.1(A)). LIP Section 13.27.5(B) lists the required findings for a MM, which the project meets, as described in the LIP Findings section of this report.

Scenic Resources
A concern was expressed that the project disrupts the natural greenscape along PCH. A scenic resource discussion is provided in Section E of the LIP Findings section of this report. The residence would be sited in the eastern (upper) area of the parcel, adjacent to neighboring residences, with much of the site retained as open space with natural vegetation. This natural area would serve as a visual buffer between the residence and PCH. Standard conditions of approval have been included for project colors, materials, and lighting to blend in with the natural hillside area.

Side Yard Setbacks
Staff received verbal comments on whether the project meets the required side yard setback on the north side of the property. The project meets all yard setback requirements with the exception of the front yard setback for which an MM is being requested. The minimum required side yard setback is 11.6 feet, while the proposed side yard setback is

17.4 feet. On the north side yard, the septic tank will meet the required minimum setback of five feet, and the seepage pits will meet the required minimum setback of eight feet.

Obstruction of Views
There are two Primary View Determinations (PVDs) within 1,000 feet of the proposed development that would be affected by the project. The project will partially obstruct ocean views from one PVD, and partially obstruct views to the hillside area on the other side of PCH from the other PVD. Concerns have been expressed about these view obstructions by the residents at the location of each of these PVDs. The applicant originally requested 220

Page 6 of 23 ends

an SPR to increase the residential structure height from the 18 feet allowed by the MMC and LIP up to 21 feet. However, once the story poles were installed, and the residents of the properties with PVDs expressed concerns, the applicant withdrew the request for the SPR (see Attachment 6 for photos of the story poles from each of the two PVD locations).

The proposed height is a maximum 18 feet. The story poles depict the originally requested height of 21 feet (top of the pole), as well as the 18 feet, with markings on the poles.

Site Drainage and Slope Stability
Neighbors expressed concern about a slope failure in the general vicinity of the project site and noted that the overall hillside is unstable. Another comment suggested that slope failures in this area of Point Dume are the possible result of improper stormwater drainage in the general area, and that the project site should be properly drained. As such, the project has been reviewed by the City Public Works Department and has been conditionally approved. Attachment 3 includes the Public Works Department review which contains conditions of approval, including those addressing stormwater and grading.

Concept plans show the site will drain to an evapotranspiration planter with an overflow pipe to a rock rip-rap outlet downslope of the residential structure. Public Works Department staff has indicated that the project’s stormwater drainage plan and grading plan will be reviewed in detail as part of Building Plan Check to ensure that the site drainage is adequate, as is standard procedure. The project was also reviewed and approved in concept by the City geotechnical review consultants, and conditions have been placed on the project to ensure site stability (see Attachment 3).

Slope Steepness
The color-coded slope analysis exhibit prepared as part of the project plans (Attachment 2) shows that the project site mostly contains slopes of less than a 4 to 1 ratio, followed by slopes of a ratio between 4 to 1 and 2 to 1, and lastly a smaller area of slopes greater than 2 to 1. The City requires the slope analysis exhibit to be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or engineer based on the site survey, measured at five-foot contour intervals. The project development would occur entirely within slopes less than a 4 to 1, consistent with the requirements for projects in the Point Dume area (LUP Policy 3.35 and LIP Section

4.6.1(A)). Commenters have expressed that the portion of the project that would serve as the Fire Department truck turnaround, just beyond the access easement, appears to have slopes steeper than 4 to 1. Staff visited the site and reviewed the color-coded slope analysis and grading plans. Staff believes that this particular location in question is steeper than the surrounding area but can reasonably be determined to be less than 4 to 1 when the five-foot contour interval is applied. Staff also reviewed historic aerial photographs of the site and determined that as far back as approximately ten years ago, the slope in this area has not substantially changed. Staff has received no other color-coded slope analysis of this site other than that provided by the applicant, nor any other exhibits showing 221

Page 7 of 23 ends

different slope ratios prepared by a licensed surveyor or engineer and based on a site survey.

Legal Lot
A public comment requested confirmation that the project parcel is a legal parcel. The applicant applied for a Certificate of Compliance (COC Case No. 23-007) for Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 4468-011-011, the project parcel, to confirm it is a legal lot in compliance with the MMC and LCP LIP. The Public Works Department reviewed the required documents and determined that the parcel is legal. The COC was approved by the City and recorded by the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office on November 9, 2023.

Biology
A public comment referenced the potential for red-tailed hawks to be present on the project site. The City Biologist conceptually approved the project with conditions, including the standard bird nesting provision that grading and excavation must avoid nesting birds and any ground interruption be completed outside of the specified period of time (see Attachment 3).

Hillside Classification
Hillside Residential Development standards established in MMC Sections

17.40.040(A)(20) and 17.62.070 do not apply to this project as the project is not sited on slopes steeper than 30 percent, and therefore, does not meet the definition of hillside development pursuant to MMC Section 17.02.0602. Based on the color-coded slope analysis exhibit, the development is proposed in areas of less than a 4 to 1 slope, which is 25 percent.

Ridgelines
LIP Chapter 2 defines a primary ridgeline as a hill, ridge or promontory that drops on either side of the top of this landform feature, and includes at least one of the following conditions:
1) forms a distinct part of the skyline when viewed from a public street or highway; or 2) is seen as a distinct and prominent edge against a backdrop of land at least five hundred feet behind it when viewed from a public street and contains an average slope of at least 3 to

1. In addition, LIP Chapter 6 provides development standards and descriptions of how scenic resources are applied.
2 Pursuant to MMC Section 17.02.060, “Hillside residential development” means a residential development occurring on a parcel of land on the inland side of Pacific Coast highway on a proposed development area located on slopes over thirty percent and which will result in grading on slopes over 30 percent. 222

Page 8 of 23 ends

LIP Interpretation No. 16 discusses the inconsistent ridgeline standard provided in LIP Chapters 2 and 6 as it relates to how to implement the protection of primary and secondary ridgelines (provided as Attachment 5 for reference). The City Council concurred with Interpretation No. 16 on October 24, 2005. In accordance with the interpretation, staff analyzed if the ridgeline standards would apply to the proposed project.

As discussed above for scenic resources and enumerated in Section E of the LCP findings (Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection), the project would not result in significant adverse impacts regarding scenic resources. LIP Section 6.3 provides that ridgeline standards do not apply if the project would not result in potentially significant adverse impacts to scenic resources.

Moreover, included as Attachment 4 is a photosimulation of the proposed project that shows the residential development would be located in a largely built out area with existing residences along Heathercliff Road located at the top of the hill. Figure 1 of this report is an aerial photo of the project site and surrounding area supporting that the area parcels are mostly built out. The subject parcel and the parcel just south of the subject parcel are the only undeveloped parcels in the neighborhood. Further south of these two parcels (not shown in Figure 1), there are additional parcels with development adjacent to the PCH.

According to LUP Section 6.4, ridgeline development standards are not applied to largely developed or built out areas. LIP Interpretation No. 16 notes that if at least 65 percent of the parcels within a neighborhood are developed, an area is considered largely developed or built out. More than 65 percent of the area parcels are developed or built out. Just considering the parcels on the west side of Heathercliff Road as visible on Figure 1, ten of 12 are developed (the two undeveloped ones are the subject site and adjacent parcel), resulting in a total 83 percent.

Access Easement
Public comments reflect a neighbor dispute about easements for ingress, egress, and utility purposes. The project property owner has provided deed documents demonstrating there is a 15-foot-wide ingress, egress, and utility easement (shown as “Parcel 4” on the grant deed) running easterly and perpendicular from the project site to connect it to Heathercliff Road. A second and larger easement of variable dimensions also for ingress, egress, and utility purposes (shown as “Parcel 3” on the grant deed) runs parallel to the site on the eastern side and perpendicular to the other easement. “Parcel 3” would provide access to the site from a point beyond “Parcel 4” and provide a portion of the fire truck turnaround area. The “Parcel 4” easement is currently unimproved but is proposed to be paved as part of the project. Additionally, the applicant proposes to widen and pave a 20- foot-long portion of the “Parcel 4” easement closest to the project site to a width of 20 feet, as required by the Fire Department. The portion of the “Parcel 3” easement used for access and the fire truck turnaround would be paved. From the project plans and based on a site visit conducted by staff, it appears that there are fences and vegetation in both easements 223

Page 9 of 23 ends

placed by adjacent property owners, which will need to be removed to provide the full required access from Heathercliff Road to the project site.

Surrounding Land Uses and Project Setting
The property is located in an area that is developed with one- and two-story single-family residences located in the RR-1 zone. Across from PCH to the west are properties zoned Rural Residential-Five Acres (RR-5). The LCP Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) and Marine Resources Map does not identify any ESHA on the subject property, or any adjacent properties. In the Point Dume area, ESHA resources are not mapped (except in one location). Rather, LCP LIP Section 4.6.1(A) requires that new development avoid slopes equal to or steeper than 4 to 1 to protect resources, such as streams. The proposed development meets this provision and there are no streams in the vicinity. There are no parks or public trails in the immediate vicinity according to the LCP Parklands Map, however, portions of the Zuma Ridge Trail are located across PCH from the site, approximately 800 feet away on the landside of PCH. Based on a site visit, existing development, project plans, and photographs taken during the site visit, it was determined that the proposed project would be visible from PCH, a scenic road, and minimally visible from the Zuma Ridge Trail.

Table 1 – Adjacent Land Uses
Address Lot Size Zone Existing Land Use
North 29319 Heathercliff Road 0.7 acre RR-1 SFR**
South 29335 Heathercliff Road 0.51 acre RR-1 SFR
29341 Heathercliff Road 0.85 acre RR-1 SFR
West 29339 PCH (beyond PCH) 1.68 acre RR-5* SFR
6238 Bonsall Drive
(beyond PCH) 3.81 acre RR-5 SFR
East 29327 Heathercliff Road 0.51 acre RR1 SFR **SFR = Single-Family Residence Table 2 – Property Data
Lot Depth 297 feet, 2 inches
Lot Width 116 feet, 1 inch
Gross Lot Area 33,532 square feet
Area of Easements* 0 square feet
Area of 1 to 1 Slopes 5,034 square feet
Net Lot Area** 28,498 square feet
*Easements referenced in this report are off-site.
**Net Lot Area = Gross Lot Area minus the area of access easements and 1 to 1 ratio slopes. 224

Page 10 of 23 ends

Project Description
The proposed scope of work is as follows:

1. Construction of:
a. 4,050 square-foot, 18 foot-tall, two-story, single-family residence, an attached 320 square-foot roof overhang, and an attached 390 square foot garage; b. 5,275 square feet of impermeable surface coverage;
c. Retaining walls not to exceed six feet in height;
d. Swimming pool and associated pool equipment;
e. Patios, decks and paving for vehicle and pedestrian access and a fire department turnaround area;
f. Trellis over deck;
g. Installation of an OWTS; and
h. Installation of 6,840 square feet of landscaping.

2. Non-exempt grading of 675 cubic yards;
Discretionary request:

MM No. 20-001 for less than a 50 percent reduction of the front yard setback.

Proposed TDSF:

Lower Level (including the attached garage and overhang) 3,300 sq. ft.

Upper Level 1,460 sq. ft.

Total: 4,760 sq. ft.

LCP Analysis
The LCP consists of a LUP and LIP. The LUP contains programs and policies to implement the Coastal Act in the City of Malibu. The purpose of the LIP is to carry out the policies of the LUP. The LIP contains specific policies and regulations to which every project requiring a coastal development permit must adhere.

There are 14 sections within the LIP that potentially require specified findings to be made, depending on the nature and location of the proposed project. Of these 14, five sections are for conformance review only and require no findings. These five sections include Zoning, Grading, Archaeological/Cultural Resources, Water Quality, and Wastewater Treatment System Standards, and are discussed below under the Conformance Analysis section. The nine remaining LIP sections include: 1) CDP findings; 2) Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA); 3) Native Tree Protection; 4) Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection; 5) Transfer of Development Credits; 6) Hazards; 7) Shoreline and Bluff Development; 8) Public Access; and 9) Land Division. These nine sections are 225

Page 11 of 23 ends

discussed under the LIP Findings section below. Of these, only CDP (including the MM findings); Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection; and Hazards findings apply to this project. Additionally, the project is subject to the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance (MMC Chapter 9.22) as the project includes landscaped areas of 2,500 square feet or more. Based on the project site, the scope of work, and substantial evidence contained within the record, the ESHA, Native Tree Protection, Transfer of Development Credits, Shoreline and Bluff Development, Public Access, and Land Division findings are neither applicable nor required for the proposed project for the reasons described herein.

LIP Conformance Analysis
The proposed project has been reviewed by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, City geotechnical review consultants, Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 (WD29), and the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) (see Attachment 3 – Department Review Sheets). The project, as proposed and conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals, and policies, inclusive of MM No. 20-001.

Zoning (LIP Chapter 3)
The project is subject to non-beachfront development and design standards set forth under LIP Sections 3.5 and 3.6. Table 3 provides a project summary and indicates the proposed project meets the non-beachfront development standards, inclusive of the requested MM.

Table 3 – LCP Zoning Conformance
Development Requirement Allowed/
Required Proposed Comments
SETBACKS (ft.)
Front Yard 59.4 ft. minimum 29.6 ft. (<50%
reduction)
MM No.
20-001
Rear Yard 44.57 ft. minimum 181 ft. Complies
Side Yard (10%)

11.6 ft. minimum
(29 ft. both sides
cumulative. )

11.7 ft (29.1 ft.
both sides cumul.) Complies
Side Yard

11.6 ft. minimum
(29 ft. both sides
cumulative.)

17.4 ft. (29.1 ft.
both sides cumul.) Complies

PARKING
Enclosed 2 2 Complies
Unenclosed 2 2 Complies

TOTAL DEVELOPMENT
SQUARE FOOTAGE (TDSF) 5,527 sq. ft. max. 4,760 sq. ft. Complies 226

Page 12 of 23 ends

Table 3 – LCP Zoning Conformance
Development Requirement Allowed/
Required Proposed Comments
IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE 8,549 sq. ft.
maximum 6,400 sq. ft. Complies
HEIGHT 18 ft. maximum 18 ft. Complies
SITE OF CONSTRUCTION Less than 4 to 1 Less than 4 to 1 Complies NON-EXEMPT GRADING 1,000 cubic yards
max. 675 cubic yards Complies

FENCES/WALLS/HEDGES/GATES
Retaining Walls 6 ft. maximum 6 ft. Complies
Grading (LIP Chapter 8)
LIP Section 8.3 ensures that new development minimizes the visual resource impacts of grading and landform alteration by restricting the amount of non-exempt grading to a maximum of 1,000 cubic yards for a residential parcel. As summarized in Table 4 and on the Total Grading Yardage Verification Certificate on the grading plan cover sheet in Attachment 2, the total amount of proposed non-exempt grading is 675 cubic yards, which is less than the maximum allowable. The project complies with grading requirements set forth under LIP Section 8.3.

Table 4 – LCP Grading Conformance
Exempt** NonR&R* Understructure Safety*** Exempt Remedial Total Cut 115 1,015 0 675 0 1,805
Fill 115 1 58 0 0 174
Total 230 1,014 58 675 0 1,979
Import 0 0 0 0 0 0
Export 0 1,014 0 675 0 1,631****
All quantities listed in cubic yards unless otherwise noted *R&R= Removal and Re-compaction
**Exempt grading includes all R&R, understructure, and safety grading. ***Safety grading is the incremental grading required for Fire Department access (such as turnouts, hammerheads, and turnarounds, and any other increases in driveway width above 15 feet required by the LACFD).
****This is the result of (1,014 understructure export + 675 non-exempt export) - 58 cut to be used onsite for safety fill.

Archaeological / Cultural Resources (LIP Chapter 11)
LIP Chapter 11 requires certain procedures to be followed to determine potential impacts on archaeological resources. An Initial Cultural Resources Assessment Evaluation performed in August 2019 by Principal Investigator John Gust, Ph.D., RPA states that 227

Page 13 of 23 ends

there is a low potential for cultural material to be found onsite, and no further cultural resources work is recommended. Nevertheless, a standard condition of approval is included that states that if potentially important cultural resources are found in the course of geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease until a qualified archaeologist can provide an evaluation of the nature and significance of the resources, and until the Planning Director can review this information.

Water Quality (LIP Chapter 17)
The City Public Works Department reviewed and approved the proposed project for conformance to LIP Chapter 17 requirements for water quality protection and requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board because the property is located in an Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) 28. The ocean between Latigo Point and the west City limits has been established by the State Water Resources Control Board as an ASBS as part of the California Ocean Plan. In compliance with the ASBS, a standard condition of approval for this project requires that prior to the issuance of any grading/building permit, a Local Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan incorporating construction-phase Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Best Management Practices must be approved by the City Public Works Department. Standard conditions of approval prior to issuance of a grading/building permit also include preparation of a Stormater Management Plan (SWMP) and Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP). With the implementation of these conditions, the proposed project conforms to the water quality protection standards of LIP Chapter 17.

Wastewater Treatment System Standards (LIP Chapter 18)
LIP Chapter 18 addresses OWTS. Section 18.7 of the LIP includes specific siting, design, and performance requirements. The project includes an OWTS to serve the proposed development, which has been reviewed by the City Environmental Health Administrator and found to meet the minimum requirements of the MMC and the LCP. This new OWTS consists of a 3,634-gallon septic tank and seepage pits. The new OWTS will be located on the northern side of the residence. The proposed OWTS will meet all applicable requirements and operating permits will be required. An operation and maintenance contract and recorded covenant covering such items must comply with City of Malibu Environmental Health requirements. Conditions of approval have been included, which require continued operation, maintenance, and monitoring of onsite facilities. 228

Page 14 of 23 ends

LIP Findings
A. Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)
LIP Section 13.9 requires that the following four findings be made for all CDPs.

Finding 1. The project as described in the application and accompanying materials, and as modified by any conditions of approval, conforms to the certified City of Malibu Local Coastal Program.

The project is located in the RR-1 residential zoning district, an area designated for residential uses, including single-family residences. The project has been reviewed for conformance with the LCP by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, WD29, and LACFD. As discussed herein, based on submitted reports, project plans, visual analysis and site investigation, the proposed project, as conditioned, conforms to the LCP in that it meets all applicable residential development standards, inclusive of the requested MM.

Finding 2. If the project is located between the first public road and the sea, the project is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976 (commencing with Sections 30200 of the Public Resources Code).

The subject parcel is not located between the first public road and the sea. The project site is located inland and not along the shoreline. Therefore, this finding does not apply.

Nevertheless, there are no trails on the subject property, and the site is expected to be only minimally visible from the Zuma Ridge Trail to the west across and upslope from PCH.

Furthermore, the subject parcel does not support coastal recreational uses, whether directly or indirectly. Therefore, no potential project-related or cumulative impact on public access and/or recreation is anticipated to result from the proposed project. As such, the proposed project conforms to the public access and recreation policies in Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976 (commencing with Sections 30200 of the Public Resources Code).

Finding 3. The project is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

The following alternative to the project was considered to determine the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative:

Alternative Project - The proposed single-family residential structure could be relocated elsewhere on the subject parcel to meet the required front yard setback. However, the residence is proposed on the flatter portion of the parcel, along the eastern side.

Relocating the project further west, toward PCH, would result in development in more vegetated areas and on slopes steeper than a 4 to 1 ratio, which is prohibited in the Point 229

Page 15 of 23 ends

Dume area, and which would likely require more grading and earthwork. It would also place the structure closer to the PCH, a scenic road. A smaller project could be proposed on the project site with a reduced footprint to meet the front yard setback requirement.

However, the project meets the maximum allowed total development area square footage.

The project would have to be substantially decreased in size to avoid steep slopes and vegetation to the west and to avoid encroaching in the front yard setback to the east.

Therefore, it is not anticipated that a relocated or reduced project would be a substantially environmentally superior alternative.

On March 28, 2024, story poles demonstrating the location, height, and bulk of the proposed project were placed on-site to aid in the visual analysis of private and public view impacts (Attachment 5 – Story Pole Photographs). Staff performed a site visit on April 3, 2024 to assess the visual impacts of the project as depicted by the story poles and determined that there would be no adverse effects on public views from PCH, as the structure would be uphill from the roadway and terraced into the hillside. The project would partially block views from two residences near the project site with PVDs. Shifting the proposed structure westerly on the site and downhill toward PCH may reduce the obstruction of views from these neighbors’ properties, although it is not expected to completely remove the view obstruction. Moving the structure downslope would result in development of steep slopes (steeper than 4 to 1) and natural scrub vegetation, as well as place the structure nearer to PCH, which is uncharacteristic of the pattern of development in the area that is closer to the top of the hill. Due to neighbor view concerns, the applicant removed the request for an SPR for building height above 18 feet, as a maximum height of 21 feet was originally proposed. The current project proposes a maximum of 18 feet in building height. While the project would still partially block views from the two residences with PVDs, the amount of blockage is reduced with the lower building height.

Proposed Project - The proposed project consists of the construction of a new singlefamily residence, which is a permitted use within the RR-1 zoning designation, in an existing single-family residentially developed area. The project complies with the size, height and location requirements of the LCP, inclusive of the MM discretionary request.

The MM request is to avoid slopes steeper than 4:1, a sensitive resource. The proposed residence has been sited to limit disturbance of the property, as it is located along the eastern side of the parcel, with the rest of the site, including steeper and more vegetated areas, to remain as natural open space. The project complies with the maximum allowable TDSF, impermeable coverage, setbacks, grading and height requirements of the LCP with the inclusion of the requested MM. In addition, the development does not disturb any public views, including from the PCH, given its proposed location on-site and that it is terraced into the slope. The proposed project would partially block views from two neighbors’ residences, although the proposed structure height of 18 feet meets the LIP and MMC maximum allowed height standard. The selected location has been reviewed and conditionally approved by the City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, and the LACFD, 230

Page 16 of 23 ends

Malibu City CouncilMay 20, 2026

Malibu City Council
May 20, 2026