and meets the City’s residential development policies of the LCP and MMC. Therefore, the proposed project, as designed, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.
Finding 4. The project is not located in or adjacent to an environmentally sensitive habitat area (ESHA) pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Malibu LIP (ESHA Overlay).
The subject property is not in a designated ESHA or ESHA buffer, as shown on the LCP ESHA and Marine Resources Map. Therefore, Environmental Review Board review was not required, and this finding does not apply.
B. Minor Modification for a Reduced Front Yard Setback (LIP Section 13.27.) Pursuant to LIP Section 13.27.1(B), a minor modification may be granted for a reduction in the front yard setback by no more than 50 percent. The project proposes a 49.8 percent reduction in the required front yard setback, from the minimum required 59.4 feet to 29.6 feet. The reduced front yard setback will avoid development on slopes 4 to 1 and steeper.
According to the LUP Policy 3.35, development in the Point Dume area shall be designed to avoid encroachment on slopes of 25 percent grade (4 to 1) or steeper. LIP Section
3.6(F)(5) states that modifications to required yards/setbacks standards shall be permitted where necessary to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive resources. The MM will enable the project to avoid the sensitive resource of slopes steeper than 4 to 1 in the Point Dume area (LUP Policy 3.35 and LIP Section 4.6.1(A). By siting the development in the easterly and flatter area of the property, the remainder of the site is retained as natural open space and provides a buffer from the residence to the PCH, a scenic road. Natural vegetation on the westerly portion of the site is also retained. The residence would be sited near neighboring residences, continuing the development pattern of houses upslope of PCH and close to Heathercliff Road. LIP Section 13.27.5(B) requires that the City make three findings in consideration and approval of a MM to reduce the required front yard setback no more than 50 percent. Based on evidence in the record, the findings in support of MM No. 20-001 are made herein.
Finding 1. The project is consistent with the policies of the Malibu LCP.
As previously discussed in Section A, Finding 1, the project, with the inclusion of the requested MM, as designed and conditioned, conforms to all applicable LCP policies and provisions. A reduction in the front yard setback is needed to avoid construction on slopes 4 to 1 and steeper. The MM will avoid impacts to steep slopes (4:1) in the Point Dume area, which are considered sensitive resources (LIP Section 4.6.1(A)).
Finding 2. The project does not adversely affect neighborhood character.
As previously stated in Section B, Finding 2, story poles were placed on the site to demonstrate the project’s potential for view impacts to the surrounding area. The project’s height and bulk will not adversely affect neighborhood character. The proposed structure 231
complies with the size, height, location, grading and residential development standards of the LCP and MMC, consistent with the RR-1 zoning designation, with the inclusion of the MM request. The building is designed stepped into the hillside. The project is compatible with other development in the adjacent area in that the neighborhood is characterized by one- and two-story residences with similar residence placement on-site and orientation parallel to PCH. Based on conformance with development standards, inclusive of the MM, and project conditions for building, driveway, and wall materials and colors, proposed site and building design characteristics, the surrounding topography, and surrounding existing development, the project is not expected to have an adverse effect on neighborhood character.
Finding 3. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of state and local law.
As previously stated in Section A, Finding 1, the project will comply with all applicable requirements of State and local law and is conditioned to comply with any relevant approvals, permits, and licenses from the City of Malibu. The project has been reviewed and conditionally approved by the City Biologist, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, City Environmental Health Administrator, and the LACFD and it meets the City’s residential development policies. The proposed project will comply with their respective standards through conditions of approval. The project must also be approved by the WD29 and the City of Malibu Environmental Sustainability Department, prior to issuance of City building permits.
C. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area Overlay (LIP Chapter 4) As determined by the City Biologist, and pursuant to the LCP ESHA and Marine Resources Map, the subject parcel does not contain ESHA. Therefore, the supplemental findings in LIP Section 4.7.6 for a use other than those conditionally permitted in the ESHA are not applicable.
D. Native Tree Protection (LIP Chapter 5)
There are no native trees on or adjacent to the subject parcel. Therefore, the findings of LIP Chapter 5 are not applicable.
232
E. Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection (LIP Chapter 6) The Scenic, Visual, and Hillside Resource Protection Chapter governs those CDP applications concerning any parcel of land that is located along or within any scenic area, scenic road or public viewing area, or provides views to or is visible from any scenic area, scenic road or public viewing area. As discussed previously, the proposed development would be visible from PCH, a scenic road, which borders the site on the west. The project is expected to only minimally be visible from the Zuma Ridge Trail, located across PCH and upslope of the site, approximately 800 feet away. Pursuant to LIP Section 6.4, written findings of fact, analysis and conclusions addressing scenic or visual resources must be included in support of all approvals, denials or conditional approvals of development located on a site or in an area where it is determined that the proposed project causes the potential to create adverse impacts upon scenic areas from or along scenic roads and public viewing areas.
The proposed development has been analyzed for impacts listed in LIP Chapter 6 by the Planning Department, and the required findings are made as follows:
Finding 1: The project, as proposed, will have no significant adverse scenic or visual impacts due to project design, location on the site or other reasons.
As noted for Finding 3 of Section A. General Coastal Development Permit, the story poles show that the project would not adversely affect views from the PCH, a scenic road.
Additionally, the photosimulation, which is provided as Attachment 4, also demonstrates that the project would not adversely affect views from PCH. In particular, the project’s retaining walls are not directly visible from PCH. Nonetheless, the project has been conditioned so that the final design of the retaining walls includes veneers, textures and colors to blend with the surrounding earth materials and landscaping. The residence would be stepped into the hillside. The residence would be sited in the eastern area of the parcel, adjacent to neighboring residences, with much of the site retained as open space with natural vegetation. This natural area would serve as a visual buffer between the residence and PCH. Therefore, the project, as proposed and conditioned, will not have significant adverse scenic or visual impacts due to project design, location or other reasons.
Standard conditions of approval have been included for colors, materials, and lighting.
Moreover, the project is expected to be only minimally visible from the Zuma Ridge Trail, which offers wide, expansive views to the overall developed area downslope and to the ocean. The site would be visible far off to the east, beyond the immediate development downslope.
233
Finding 2: The project as conditioned will not have significant adverse scenic or visual impacts due to required project modifications, landscaping or other conditions.
As discussed for Finding 1 above, the project would not have any significant adverse scenic or visual impacts. A condition of approval has been added to ensure retaining walls are treated to blend in with the surrounding natural environment. The project has also been conditioned to include limitations on exterior lighting and colors of exterior finishes used to prevent any visual impacts to scenic areas. The project as conditioned will not have significant adverse scenic or visual impacts.
Finding 3: The project, as proposed or as conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.
As discussed in Section A, Finding 3, the proposed project is the least damaging alternative to develop the site.
Finding 4: There are no feasible alternatives to development that would avoid or substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts on scenic and visual resources.
The project, as designed and conditioned, and as discussed in Finding 1, is not expected to adversely affect scenic and visual resources and no feasible alternatives would avoid or substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts on scenic and visual resources.
Finding 5: Development in a specific location on the site may have adverse scenic and visual impacts but will eliminate, minimize or otherwise contribute to conformance to sensitive resource protection policies contained in the certified LCP.
As discussed for Finding 1, the project would not have any significant adverse scenic or visual impacts.
F. Transfer of Development Credit (LIP Chapter 7)
According to LIP Section 7.2, transfer of development credits only applies to land divisions and multi-family development in specified zones. The proposed project does not include a land division or multi-family development. Therefore, LIP Chapter 7 does not apply.
G. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)
Pursuant to LIP Section 9.3, written findings of fact, analysis and conclusions addressing geologic, flood and fire hazards, structural integrity or other potential hazards listed in LIP Sections 9.2.A, Items 1-7 must be included in support of all approvals, denials or conditional approvals of development located on a site or in an area where it is determined 234
that the proposed project causes the potential to create adverse impacts upon site stability or structural integrity.
The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, City geotechnical review consultants, WD29, and the LACFD.
The required findings are made as follows:
Finding 1. The project as proposed will neither be subject to nor increase instability of the site or structural integrity from geologic, flood, or fire hazards due to project design, location on the site or other reasons.
The applicant submitted civil engineering plans and geotechnical and soils engineering reports and addenda prepared by Leighton and Associates, Inc. These reports are on file are on file at City Hall. The reports evaluate site-specific conditions, and recommendations are provided to address any pertinent issues. The project site is not in a liquefaction, landslide or Alquist Priolo Earthquake Zone. Groundwater is not expected to be encountered during construction. The project plans and associated technical reports have been reviewed by City geotechnical review consultants, the LACFD, the City Public Works Department, and the City Environmental Health Administrator. These specialists determined that the project, with conditions, would not result in adverse geologic or flood impacts. It has been determined that the project is not located in a hazard zone, except that the project site is located within an extreme fire hazard area.
Fire Hazard
The entire City of Malibu is designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, a zone defined by a more destructive behavior of fire and a greater probability of flames and embers threatening buildings. The scope of work proposed as part of this application is not expected to have an impact on wildlife hazards. The property is currently subject to wildfire, however, development of a residence and associated development on the subject property will not increase the site’s susceptibility to wildfire. The proposed development may actually decrease the site’s susceptibility to wildfire through compliance with fuel modification requirements and the use of appropriate building materials will be utilized during construction.
The City is served by the LACFD, as well as the California Department of Forestry, if needed. In the event of major fires, the County has “mutual aid agreements” with cities and counties throughout the State so that additional personnel and firefighting equipment can augment the LACFD. Conditions of approval have been included to require compliance with all LACFD development standards. As such, the proposed project, as designed, constructed, and conditioned, will not be subject to nor increase the instability of the site or structural integrity involving wildfire hazards. 235
Finding 2. The project, as conditioned, will not have significant adverse impacts on site stability or structural integrity from geologic, flood or fire hazards due to required project modifications, landscaping or other conditions.
As stated in Finding 1, the proposed project, as designed, conditioned and approved by the applicable departments and agencies, will not have any significant adverse impacts on the site stability or structural integrity from geologic or flood hazards due to project modifications, landscaping or other conditions.
Finding 3. The project, as proposed or as conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.
As previously stated in Section A, Finding 3, the proposed project, as designed and conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.
Finding 4. There are no alternatives to development that would avoid or substantially lessen impacts on site stability or structural integrity.
The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 by the City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical review consultants, the City Public Works Department and the LACFD. Any special conditions from these departments regarding site stability must be met prior to issuance of a building permit; any special conditions from the City Building Safety Department and the LACFD regarding structural integrity must be met prior to issuance of a building permit. Therefore, no feasible alternatives to the proposed development that would avoid or substantially lessen impacts on site stability or structural integrity are required nor available.
Finding 5. Development in a specific location on the site may have adverse impacts but will eliminate, minimize or otherwise contribute to conformance to sensitive resource protection policies contained in the certified Malibu LCP.
As previously discussed in Section A findings, the proposed project, as designed and conditioned, will not have adverse impacts on sensitive resources.
H. Shoreline and Bluff Development (LIP Chapter 10)
Chapter 10 of the LIP applies to land that is located on or along the shoreline, a coastal bluff or bluff top fronting the shoreline. The project site is not located on or along the shoreline, a coastal bluff or bluff top fronting the shoreline. Therefore, the findings of LIP Chapter 10 are not applicable.
236
I. Public Access (LIP Chapter 12)
LIP Section 12.4 requires public access for lateral, bluff-top, and vertical access near the ocean, trails, and recreational access for the following cases:
A. New development on any parcel or location specifically identified in the LUP or in the LCP zoning districts as appropriate for or containing a historically used or suitable public access trail or pathway.
B. New development between the nearest public roadway and the sea.
C. New development on any site where there is substantial evidence of a public right of access to or along the sea or public tidelands, a blufftop trail or an inland trail acquired through use or a public right of access through legislative authorization.
D. New development on any site where a trail, bluff top access or other recreational access is necessary to mitigate impacts of the development on public access where there is no feasible, less environmentally damaging, project alternative that would avoid impacts to public access.
As described herein, the subject property and the proposed project do not meet any of these criteria in that no trails are identified on the LCP Park Lands Map on or adjacent to the property, and the property is not located between the first public road and the sea, or on a bluff, and the project does not adversely impact existing public access. The requirement for public access of LIP Section 12.4 does not apply and further findings are not required.
J. Land Division (LIP Chapter 15)
The project does not include any land division. Therefore, LIP Chapter 15 is not applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in CEQA, the Planning Department has analyzed the proposed project. The Planning Department found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15303(a) and (e) - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The Planning Department has further determined that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE: Public comments have expressed concerns regarding view obstruction, steep slopes, setbacks from property lines, stormwater drainage, slope stability, access easements, ridgelines, scenic resources, hillside classification, sensitive biological species, and lot legality. A discussion of these items is provided above under “Project Overview.” Written public comments on the project are included as Attachment 8. 237
PUBLIC NOTICE: Staff published a Notice of Public Hearing in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and mailed the notice to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property on September 26, 2024 (Attachment 7).
SUMMARY: The required findings can be made that the project complies with the LCP and MMC. Furthermore, the Planning Department’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Based on the analysis contained in this report and the accompanying resolution, staff recommends approval of this project, subject to the conditions of approval contained in Section 5 (Conditions of Approval) of Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-64. The project has been reviewed and conditionally approved for conformance with the LCP by Planning Department staff and appropriate City and County departments.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-64
2. Project Plans
3. Department Review Sheets
4. Photosimulation of Project
5. LCP Interpretation No. 16
6. Story Pole Photos
7. Public Hearing Notice
8. Public Correspondence
238
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 24-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MALIBU DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND
APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 20-003 TO
CONSTRUCT A NEW 4,050 SQUARE-FOOT, TWO-STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 390 SQUARE-FOOT GARAGE,
SWIMMING POOL, LANDSCAPING, HARDSCAPE, RETAINING WALLS,
GRADING, AND INSTALLATION OF A NEW ONSITE WASTEWATER
TREATMENT SYSTEM, INCLUDING MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 20-001 FOR UP TO A 50 PERCENT REDUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK,
LOCATED IN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL-ONE ACRE ZONING DISTRICT AT 29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD (ACS INTERNATIONAL, LLC)
The Planning Commission of the City of Malibu does hereby find, order and resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals.
A. On January 9, 2020, an application for Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 20- 003 to allow for a new single-family residence and associated development was submitted to the Planning Department by ACS International, LLC. The application was routed to the City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 (WD29), and Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) for review.
B. On September 29, 2022, a Notice of Coastal Development Permit Application was posted on the subject property.
C. On December 14, 2023, the application was deemed complete for processing.
D. On March 15, 2024, Planning Department staff determined the application qualified to be processed administratively pursuant to Local Coastal Program (LCP) Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Section 13.13.1.
E. On May 24, 2024, the Planning Director approved Administrative Coastal Development Permit (ACDP) No. 20-003, inclusive of Minor Modification (MM) No. 20-001.
After considering public comments received by the Planning Director on the ACDP and prior to reporting the item to Planning Commission, the applicant requested that the application be processed as a regular CDP.
F. On September 26, 2024, a Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.
DRAFT 239
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
G. On October 7, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, reviewed and considered the staff report, reviewed and considered written reports, public testimony, and other information in the record.
SECTION 2. Environmental Review.
Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission has analyzed the proposed project. The Planning Commission found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15303(a) and (e) – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The Planning Commission has further determined that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).
SECTION 3. Coastal Development Permit Findings.
Based on evidence contained within the record and pursuant to the LCP LIP, including Sections
13.7(B) and 13.9, the Planning Commission adopts the findings of fact, and approves CDP No. 20-003 for construction of a new 4,050 square-foot, split-level, 18-foot tall, two-story singlefamily residence with an attached 390 square-foot garage, a swimming pool, landscaping, hardscape, retaining walls, grading, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), including MM No. 20-001 for up to a 50 percent reduction of the front yard setback, located in the Rural Residential–One Acre (RR-1) zoning district at 29329 Heathercliff Road.
The project, as conditioned, is consistent with the LCP’s zoning, grading, cultural resources, water quality, and wastewater treatment system standards requirements. With the inclusion of the proposed MM, the project has been determined to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals, and policies. The required findings are made herein.
A. General Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)
1. The project is located in the RR-1 residential zoning district, an area designated for residential uses, including single-family residences. The project has been reviewed for conformance with the LCP by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, City geotechnical staff, WD29, and the LACFD.
As discussed herein, based on submitted reports, project plans, visual analysis and site investigation, the proposed project, as conditioned, conforms to the LCP in that it meets all applicable residential development standards, including the size, height, and location requirements of the LCP, inclusive of the requested MM.
2. Evidence in the record, including detailed alternatives analysis provided in the agenda report, demonstrates that as conditioned, the project meets the development policies of the LCP, does not result in adverse impacts on coastal resources and has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative.
DRAFT 240
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
B. Minor Modification Findings for Front Yard Setback (LIP Section 13.27)
1. The project proposes a 49.8 percent reduction in the required front yard setback, from the minimum required 59.4 feet to 29.6 feet. The reduced front yard setback will avoid development on slopes 4 to 1 and steeper, considered sensitive resources. By siting the development in the easterly and flatter area of the property, the remainder of the site is retained as natural open space and provides a buffer from the residence to the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH), a scenic road. Natural vegetation on the westerly portion of the site is also retained. The residence would be sited near neighboring residences, continuing the development pattern of houses upslope of PCH and close to Heathercliff Road.
2. The project’s height and bulk will not adversely affect neighborhood character. The proposed structure complies with the size, height, location, grading and residential development standards of the LCP and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC), consistent with the RR-1 zoning designation, with the inclusion of the MM request. The project is compatible with other development in the adjacent area in that the neighborhood is characterized by one- and two-story residences with similar residence placement near or at the top of the hillside and orientation parallel to PCH. Based on conformance with development standards, inclusive of the MM, project conditions for building, driveway, wall materials and colors, the particular proposed site and building design characteristics, the surrounding topography, and surrounding existing development, the project is not expected to have an adverse effect on neighborhood character.
3. The project will comply with all applicable requirements of State and local law, and is conditioned to comply with any relevant approvals, permits, and licenses from the City of Malibu, including those of the City Biologist, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, City Environmental Health Administrator, WD29 and the LACFD. The project must also be approved by the WD29 and the City of Malibu Building Safety/Environmental Sustainability Department prior to issuance of City building permits.
C. Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection (LIP Chapter 6)
1. The residential structure will not adversely affect views from PCH, a scenic road.
The project meets the required development standards of the MMC and LIP, including size, height and location, inclusive of the MM for front yard setback. The residential structure will be located on the flatter portion of the site, upslope from PCH, and adjacent to other residences along Heathercliff Road, leaving the southern portion of the site along the scenic road as open space with natural habitat and serving as a visual buffer from the development. The residential structure is expected to be only minimally visible from the Zuma Ridge Trail located across PCH and upslope from the project site. The residence will be stepped into the hillside. The project’s retaining walls are not directly visible from PCH. Nonetheless, the project has been conditioned so that the final design of the retaining walls includes veneers, textures and colors to blend with the surrounding earth materials and landscaping. Standard conditions of approval have been included for building and pavement colors, materials, and lighting. Therefore, the project, as proposed and conditioned, will not have significant adverse scenic or visual impacts upon scenic roads and public viewing areas.
DRAFT 241
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
2. The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect scenic and visual resources and no feasible alternatives will avoid or substantially lessen significant adverse impacts on scenic and visual resources. The structures will be sited on the flatter portion of the site furthest from the PCH, leaving most of the site and natural scrub vegetation preserved as a buffer between the development and the PCH. A condition of approval has been added to ensure retaining walls are treated to blend in with the surrounding natural environment. The project has also been conditioned to include limitations on exterior lighting and colors of exterior finishes used to prevent any visual impacts to scenic areas. Shifting the proposed structure westerly on the site and downhill toward the PCH may reduce the obstruction of views from neighbors’ properties, although it is not expected to completely remove the view obstruction. Moving the structure downslope would result in development of steep slopes (steeper than 4 to 1) that are considered sensitive resources and natural scrub vegetation, as well as place the structure nearer to PCH, which is uncharacteristic of the pattern of development in the area that is closer to the top of the hill.
D. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)
1. The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, City geotechnical review consultants, WD29, and the LACFD. These specialists determined that the project, with conditions, would not result in adverse geologic or flood impacts. The project is not located in a hazard zone, except that the site is within an extreme fire hazard area, and groundwater is not expected to be encountered during construction. Any special conditions from these departments regarding site stability must be met prior to issuance of a building permit; any special conditions from the City Building Safety Department and the LACFD regarding structural integrity must be met prior to issuance of a building permit.
Therefore, no feasible alternatives to the proposed development that would avoid or substantially lessen impacts on site stability or structural integrity are required nor available.
2. The entire City of Malibu is designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.
The property is currently subject to wildfire, however, development of a residence and associated development on the subject property will not increase the site’s susceptibility to wildfire. The proposed development may actually decrease the site’s susceptibility to wildfire through compliance with fuel modification requirements and the use of appropriate building materials which will be utilized during construction. The City is served by the LACFD, as well as the California Department of Forestry, if needed. In the event of major fires, the County has “mutual aid agreements” with cities and counties throughout the State so that additional personnel and firefighting equipment can augment the LACFD. Conditions of approval have been included to require compliance with all LACFD development standards. As such, the proposed project, as designed, constructed, and conditioned, will not be subject to nor increase the instability of the site or structural integrity involving wildfire hazards.
3. The project site is not in a liquefaction, landslide or Alquist Priolo Earthquake Zone.
Groundwater is not expected to be encountered during construction. The project plans and DRAFT 242
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
associated technical reports have been reviewed by City geotechnical review consultants, the LACFD, the City Public Works Department, and the City Environmental Health Administrator.
These specialists determined that the project, with conditions, would not result in adverse geologic or flood impacts. It has been determined that the project is not located in a hazard zone, except that the project site is located within an extreme fire hazard area.
SECTION 4. Planning Commission Action.
Based on the foregoing findings and evidence contained within the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves CDP No. 20-003 and MM No. 20-001, subject to the following conditions.
SECTION 5. Conditions of Approval.
Standard Conditions
1. The property owners, and their successors in interest, shall indemnify and defend the City of Malibu and its officers, employees and agents from and against all liability and costs relating to the City's actions concerning this project, including (without limitation) any award of litigation expenses in favor of any person or entity who seeks to challenge the validity of any of the City's actions or decisions in connection with this project. The City shall have the sole right to choose its counsel and property owners shall reimburse the City’s expenses incurred in its defense of any lawsuit challenging the City’s actions concerning this project.
2. Approval of this application is to allow for the following:
a. Construction of:
4,050 square-foot, 18 foot-tall, two-story, single-family residence, an attached 320 square-foot roof overhang, and an attached 390 square foot garage; 5,275 square feet of impermeable surface coverage;
Retaining walls not to exceed six feet in height;
Swimming pool and associated pool equipment;
Patios, decks and paving for vehicle and pedestrian access and a fire department turnaround area;
Trellis over deck;
OWTS; and
6,840 square feet of landscaping.
b. Non-exempt grading of 675 cubic yards;
3. Except as specifically changed by conditions of approval, the proposed development shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the approved scope of work, as described in Condition 2 and depicted on plans on file with the Planning Department date stamped August 15, 2023 and March 21, 2024. The proposed development shall further comply with all conditions of approval stipulated in this resolution and Department Review Sheets attached DRAFT 243
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
hereto. In the event project plans conflict with any condition of approval, the condition shall take precedence.
4. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.18.2, this permit and rights conferred in this approval shall not be effective until the property owner signs and returns the Acceptance of Conditions Affidavit accepting the conditions set forth herein. The applicant shall file this form with the Planning Department within 10 days of this decision and/or prior to issuance of any development permits.
5. The applicant shall digitally submit a complete set of plans to the Planning Department for consistency review and approval prior to plan check and again prior to the issuance of any building or development permits.
6. The CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three (3) years after issuance of the permit unless a time extension has been granted. Extension of the permit may be granted by the approving authority for due cause. Extensions shall be requested in writing by the applicant or authorized agent prior to expiration of the three-year period and shall set forth the reasons for the request. In the event of an appeal, the CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three years from the date the appeal is decided by the decision-making body or withdrawn by the appellant.
7. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition of approval will be resolved by the Planning Director upon written request of such interpretation.
8. All development shall conform to requirements of the City of Malibu Environmental Sustainability Department, City Biologist, City Coastal Engineer, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, WD29 and LACFD, as applicable. Notwithstanding this review, all required permits shall be secured.
9. Minor changes to the approved plans or the conditions of approval may be approved by the Planning Director, provided such changes achieve substantially the same results and the project is still in compliance with the MMC and the LCP. Revised plans reflecting the minor changes and additional fees shall be required.
10. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.20, development pursuant to an approved CDP shall not commence until the CDP is effective. The CDP is not effective until all appeals have been exhausted.
11. The property owner must submit payment for any outstanding fees payable to the City prior to issuance of any building permit, including grading or demolition.
Cultural Resources
12. In the event that potentially important cultural resources are found in the course of geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease until a qualified archaeologist can provide an evaluation of the nature and significance of the resources and until the Planning DRAFT 244
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
Director can review this information. Thereafter, the procedures contained in LIP Chapter 11 and those in MMC Section 17.54.040(D)(4)(b) shall be followed.
13. If human bone is discovered during geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease and the procedures described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code shall be followed. Section 7050.5 requires notification of the coroner. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, the applicant shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission by phone within 24 hours. Following notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, the procedures described in Section 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code shall be followed.
Lighting
14. No outdoor lighting is approved as part of this project. A lighting plan shall be submitted for City approval prior to Building Safety plan check, consistent with City standards, and the following:
Exterior lighting must comply with the Dark Sky Ordinance and shall be minimized, shielded, or concealed and restricted to low intensity features, so that no light source is directly visible from public view. Permitted lighting shall conform to the following standards:
o Lighting for walkways shall be limited to fixtures that do not exceed two feet in height and are directed downward, and limited to 850 lumens (equivalent to a 60 watt incandescent bulb);
o Security lighting controlled by motion detectors may be attached to the residence provided it is directed downward and is limited to 850 lumens; o Driveway lighting shall be limited to the minimum lighting necessary for safe vehicular use. The lighting shall be limited to 850 lumens; o Lights at entrances as required by the Building Code shall be permitted provided that such lighting does not exceed 850 lumens; o Site perimeter lighting shall be prohibited; and
o Outdoor decorative lighting for aesthetic purposes is prohibited. Night lighting for sports courts or other private recreational facilities shall be prohibited.
No permanently installed lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. Lighting levels on any nearby property from artificial light sources on the subject property(ies) shall not produce an illumination level greater than one footcandle. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded directed downward and inward so there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. High intensity lighting of the shore is prohibited.
DRAFT 245
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
String lights are allowed in occupied dining and entertainment areas only and must not exceed 3,000 Kelvin.
Motion sensor lights shall be programmed to extinguish ten minutes after activation. Three violations of the conditions by the same property owner will result in a requirement to permanently remove the outdoor light fixture(s) from the site.
Fencing and Walls
15. The height of walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A). No retaining wall shall exceed six feet in height or 12 feet in height for a combination of two or more walls.
16. All necessary boundary fencing shall be of an open rail-type design with a wooden rail at the top (instead of wire), be less than 40-inches high, and have a space greater than 14-inches between the ground and the bottom post or wire. A split rail design that blends with the natural environment is preferred.
Construction/Framing
17. Prior to the commencement of work, the applicant shall submit a copy of the Construction Management Plan to the Planning Department. The Construction Management Plan shall include a dedicated parking location for construction workers and storage of construction material, not within the public right of way. Prior to permit issuance, the Construction Management Plan must be acceptable to the Planning Director, and, if applicable, to the Building Official and Public Works Director.
18. A construction staging plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to plan check submittal.
19. Construction hours shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. No construction activities shall be permitted on Sundays or City-designated holidays.
20. Construction management techniques, including minimizing the amount of equipment used simultaneously and increasing the distance between emission sources, shall be employed as feasible and appropriate. All trucks leaving the construction site shall adhere to the California Vehicle Code. In addition, construction vehicles shall be covered when necessary and their tires rinsed prior to leaving the property.
21. All new development, including construction, grading, and landscaping shall be designed to incorporate drainage and erosion control measures prepared by a licensed engineer that incorporate structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control the DRAFT 246
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
volume, velocity and pollutant load of stormwater runoff in compliance with all requirements contained in LIP Chapter 17, including:
a. Construction shall be phased to the extent feasible and practical to limit the amount of disturbed areas present at a given time.
b. Grading activities shall be planned during the southern California dry season (April through October).
c. During construction, contractors shall be required to utilize sandbags and berms to control runoff during on-site watering and periods of rain in order to minimize surface water contamination.
d. Filter fences designed to intercept and detain sediment while decreasing the velocity of runoff shall be employed within the project site.
22. When framing is complete, a site survey shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer or architect that states the finished ground level elevation and the highest roof member elevation.
Prior to the commencement of further construction activities, said document shall be submitted to the assigned Building Inspector and Planning Department for review and sign off on framing.
23. For the transportation of heavy construction equipment and/or material, which requires the use of oversized-transport vehicles on State highways, the applicant / property owner is required to obtain a transportation permit from the California Department of Transportation.
Colors and Materials
24. The project is visible from a scenic road, therefore, shall incorporate colors and exterior materials that are compatible with the surrounding landscape. a. Acceptable colors shall be limited to colors compatible with the surrounding environment (earth tones) including shades of green, brown and gray, with no white or light shades and no bright tones. Colors shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and clearly indicated on the building plans. b. The use of highly reflective materials shall be prohibited except for solar energy panels or cells, which shall be placed to minimize significant adverse impacts to public views to the maximum extent feasible.
c. All windows shall be comprised of non-glare glass.
25. All driveways shall be a neutral color that blends with the surrounding landforms and vegetation. Retaining walls shall incorporate veneers, texturing and/or colors that blend with the surrounding earth materials or landscape. The color of driveways and retaining walls shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and clearly indicated on all grading, improvement and/or building plans.
DRAFT 247
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
Fuel Modification
26. Prior to the issuance of final building permits, the project shall receive LACFD approval of a Final Fuel Modification Plan.
Site Specific Conditions
27. The project shall comply with all requirements and conditions of the LACFD.
Biology/Landscaping
28. Except as permitted pursuant to the provisions in LUP policies 3.18 and 3.20, throughout the City of Malibu, development that involves the use of pesticides, including insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides or any other similar toxic chemical substances, shall be prohibited in cases where the application of such substances would have the potential to significantly degrade Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas or coastal water quality or harm wildlife.
Herbicides may be used for the eradication of invasive plant species or habitat restoration, but only if the use of non-chemical methods for prevention and management such as physical, mechanical, cultural, and biological controls are infeasible. Herbicides shall be restricted to the least toxic product and method, and to the maximum extent feasible, shall be biodegradable, derived from natural sources, and used for a limited time.
29. Prior to installation of any landscaping, the applicant shall obtain a plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division.
30. Prior to final Planning inspection or other final project sign off (as applicable), the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director for review and approval a certificate of completion in accordance with the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance (MMC Chapter 17.53). The certificate shall include the property owner’s signed acceptance of responsibility for maintaining the landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans and MMC Chapter 17.53.
31. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City of Malibu, are prohibited.
32. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to significantly obstruct the primary view from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth).
33. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote or copper arsenate.
34. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.
35. No development is permitted on slopes steeper than 4 to 1.
DRAFT 248
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
36. Prior to a final plan check approval, the property owner /applicant must provide a landscape water use approval from the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29.
37. Vegetation forming a view impermeable condition serving the same function as a fence or wall (also known as a hedge) located within the side or rear yard setback shall be maintained at or below a height of six feet. A hedge located within the front yard setback shall be maintained at or below a height of 42 inches. Three violations of this condition will result in a requirement to permanently remove the vegetation from the site.
38. Vegetation in excess of six feet in height shall not obstruct the primary view of existing residences located within a 1,000-foot radius at any given time (given consideration of its future growth).
39. Plantings required for fuel modification, except for within irrigated Zone A nearest to approved residential structures, must be native, drought-tolerant species and shall blend with the existing natural vegetation and natural habitats on the site.
40. Grading shall be scheduled only during the dry season from April 1 – October 31. If it becomes necessary to conduct grading activities from November 1 – March 31, a comprehensive erosion control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of a grading permit and implemented prior to initiation of vegetation removal and/or grading activities.
41. The landscape and fuel modification plan has been conditioned to protect natural resources in accordance with the LCP. All areas shall be planted and maintained as described in the landscape and fuel modification plan. Failure to comply with the landscape conditions is a violation of the conditions of approval for this project.
42. All open areas not used for buildings, driveways, parking areas, or walkways shall be attractively landscaped and maintained in accordance with a landscape plan, with native plant species, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
43. Native species of the Santa Monica Mountains, characteristic of the local habitat, shall be used on graded slopes or where slope plantings are required for slope stabilization, erosion control, and watershed protection. Plants should be selected to have a variety of rooting depths. A spacing of 15 feet between large woody (≥10-foot canopy) shrubs is recommended by the LACFD. Lawns are prohibited on slopes > 5 percent.
44. Slope planting measures such as contour planting and terracing or other techniques shall be incorporated on slopes to interrupt the flow and rate of surface runoff in order to prevent surface soil erosion.
45. Grading/excavation/vegetation removal scheduled between February 1 – September 15 will require bird nesting surveys by a qualified biologist prior to initiation of such activities.
Surveys shall be completed no more than five days from proposed initiation of site preparation DRAFT 249
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
activities. Should active nests be identified, a buffer area of no less than 150 feet (300 feet for raptors). Shall be fenced off until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. A report discussing the results of the surveys shall be turned in to the City within two business days of completion of surveys.
46. Construction fencing shall be placed within five feet of the limits of grading. Construction fencing shall be installed prior to the beginning of any construction and shall be maintained throughout the construction period to protect the site’s sensitive habitat areas.
47. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded so it is directed downward and inward so that there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. Up-lighting is prohibited.
48. The use of wood chips and shredded rubber is prohibited anywhere on the site. Flammable mulch material, including shredded bark, pine needles, and artificial turf, are prohibited between zero and five feet of a structure. Non-continuous use of flammable mulch (excluding wood chips and shredded rubber) is allowed between 5 and 30 feet from the eave/overhang of a structure with limited application areas. Any mulch materials (excluding wood chips and shredded rubber) are allowed 30 feet or more from a structure with no limitation on application area.
Public Works – Grading and Drainage
49. The applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department prior to the commencement of any work within the public right-of-way. The driveway shall be constructed of either six inches of concrete over four inches of aggregate base, or four inches of asphalt concrete over six inches of aggregate base. The driveway shall be flush with the existing grades with no curbs.
50. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMPs shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show all storm drain lines, inlets, outlets, post-construction BMPs and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements.
51. Clearing and grading during the rainy season (extending from November 1 to March 31) shall be prohibited for development LIP Section 17.3.1 that:
• Is located within or adjacent to ESHA, or
• Includes grading on slopes greater than 4:1
• Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4:1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading operations before the rainy season. If grading operations are not completed before the rainy season begins, grading shall be halted and temporary erosion control measures shall be put into place to minimize erosion DRAFT 250
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
until grading resumes after March 31, unless the City determines that completion of grading would be more protective of resources.
52. Exported soil from a site shall be taken to the County Landfill or to a site with an active grading permit and the ability to accept the material in compliance with the City’s LIP Section 8.3. A note shall be placed on the project that addresses this condition.
53. A grading and drainage plan shall be approved containing the following information prior to the issuance of grading permits for the project.
• Public Works Department General Notes
• The existing and proposed square footage of impervious coverage on the property shall be shown on the grading plan (including separate areas for buildings, driveways, walkways, parking, tennis courts and pool decks). • The limits of land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated on the grading plan and a total area shall be shown on the plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits of grading, areas disturbed for the installation of the septic system, and areas disturbed for the installation of the detention system shall be included within the area delineated. • The grading limits shall include the temporary cuts made for retaining walls, buttresses, and over excavations for fill slopes and shall be shown on the grading plan.
• If the property contains trees that are to be protected they shall be highlighted on the grading plan.
• If the property contains rare and endangered species as identified in the resources study the grading plan shall contain a prominent note identifying the areas to be protected (to be left undisturbed). Fencing of these areas shall be delineated on the grading plan if required by the City Biologist.
• Private storm drain systems shall be shown on the grading plan. Systems greater than 12-inch diameter shall also have a plan and profile for the system included with the grading plan.
• Public storm drain modifications shown on the grading plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit.
54. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMPs shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show all storm drain lines, inlets, outlet, postconstruction BMP’s and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements.
55. The non-exempt grading for the project shall not exceed a total of 675 cubic yards, cut and fill.
56. The total grading yardage verification certificate shall be copied onto the coversheet of the Grading Plan. No alternative formats or substitutes will be accepted.
DRAFT 251
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
Public Works – Storm Water
57. A Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (LSWPPP) shall be provided prior to issuance of grading/building permits. This plan shall include an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) that includes, but is not limited to:
Erosion Controls Scheduling Erosion Controls Scheduling Preservation of Existing Vegetation
Sediment Controls
Silt Fence
Sand Bag Barrier
Stabilized Construction Entrance
Non-Storm Water Management Water Conservation Practices Dewatering Operations
Waste Management
Material Delivery and Storage
Stockpile Management
Spill Prevention and Control
Solid Waste Management
Concrete Waste Management
Sanitary/Septic Waste Management
All BMPs shall be in accordance to the latest version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) BMP Handbook. Designated areas for the storage of construction materials, solid waste management, and portable toilets must not disrupt drainage patterns or subject the material to erosion by site runoff.
58. A Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted for review and approval of the Public Works Director. The WQMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage on the site. The WQMP shall meet all the requirements of the City’s current Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System (MS4) permit. The following elements shall be included within the WQMP:
a. Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs):
b. Source Control BMPs;
c. Treatment Control BMPs that retain on-site Stormwater Quality Design Volume (SWQDv). Or where it is technically infeasible to retain on-site, the project must biofiltrate 1.5 times the SWQDv that is not retained on-site; d. Drainage improvements;
e. A plan for the maintenance and monitoring of the proposed treatment BMPs for the expected life of the structure;
f. Methods of onsite percolation, site re-vegetation and an analysis for off-site project impacts;
g. Measures to treat and infiltrate runoff from impervious areas; h. A copy of the WQMP shall be filed against the property to provide constructive notice to future property owners of their obligation to maintain the water quality DRAFT 252
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
measure installed during construction prior to the issuance of grading or building permits; and
i. The WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and the fee applicable at the time of submittal for review of the WQMP shall be paid prior to the start of the technical review. The WQMP shall be approved prior the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading and drainage plan and/or building plans. The Public Works Department will tentatively approve the plan and will keep a copy until the completion of the project. Once the project is completed, the applicant shall verify the installation of the BMP’s, make any revisions to the WQMP, and resubmit to the Public Works Department for approval. The original signed and notarized document shall be recorded with the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. A certified copy of the WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
59. A Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shall be submitted for review and approval of the Public Works Director. The SWMP shall be prepared in accordance with the LIP Section 17.3.2 and all other applicable ordinances and regulations. The SWMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the pre-development and post-development drainage of the site. The SWMP shall identify the site design and source control BMPs that have been implemented in the design of the project. The SWMP shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading or building permit for this project.
60. The ocean between Latigo Point and the west City limits has been established by the State Water Resources Control Board as an Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) as part of the California Ocean Plan. This designation prohibits the discharge of any waste, including stormwater runoff, directly into the ASBS. The applicant shall provide a drainage system that accomplishes the following:
a. Installation of BMPs that are designed to treat the potential pollutants in the stormwater runoff so that it does not alter the natural ocean water quality. These pollutants include trash, oil and grease, metals, bacteria, nutrients, pesticides, herbicides and sediment.
b. Prohibits the discharge of trash.
c. Only discharges from existing storm drain outfalls are allowed. No new outfalls will be allowed. Any proposed or new storm water discharged shall be routed to existing storm drain outfalls and shall not result in any new contribution of waste to the ASBS (i.e., no additional pollutant loading).
d. Elimination of non-storm water discharges.
Geology
61. All recommendations of the consulting certified engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer and/or the City geotechnical consultant reviewers shall be incorporated into all final design and construction including foundations, grading, sewage disposal, and drainage. Final DRAFT 253
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City geotechnical consultant reviewers prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
62. Final plans approved by the City geotechnical consultant reviewers shall be in substantial conformance with the approved CDP relative to construction, grading, sewage disposal and drainage. Any substantial changes may require a CDP amendment or a new CD.
Swimming Pool/Spa/Water Feature
63. Onsite noise, including that which emanates from swimming pool and air conditioning equipment, shall be limited as described in MMC Chapter 8.24 (Noise).
64. Pool and air conditioning equipment that will be installed shall be screened from view by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A).
65. All swimming pools shall contain double walled construction with drains and leak detection systems capable of sensing a leak of the inner wall.
66. The discharge of swimming pool, spa and decorative fountain water and filter backwash, including water containing bacteria, detergents, wastes, algaecides, or other chemicals is prohibited. Swimming pool, spa, and decorative fountain water may be used as landscape irrigation only if the following items are met:
a. The discharge water is dechlorinated, debrominated or if the water is disinfected using ozonation;
b. There are sufficient BMPs in place to prevent soil erosion; and c. The discharge does not reach into the MS4 or to the ASBS (including tributaries)
67. Discharges not meeting the above-mentioned methods must be trucked to a Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Works.
68. A sign stating “It is illegal to discharge pool, spa, or water feature waters to a street, drainage course, or storm drain per MMC Section 13.04.060(D)(5)” shall be posted in the filtration and/or pumping equipment area for the property. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall indicate the method of disinfection and the method of discharging.
69. Pursuant to MMC Section 9.20.040(B), all ponds, decorative fountains shall require a water recirculating/recycling system.
Environmental Health/OWTS
70. OWTS on Architectural and Grading Plans: The final Architectural Site Plan (Sheet A-0.1) and Grading Plans must show the OWTS, including the treatment tank(s), present/future seepage pits, and all lines of connection to the residence.
DRAFT 254
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
71. Final OWTS Plot Plan: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a final OWTS plot plan prepared by a City Registered OWTS Designer shall be submitted showing an OWTS design meeting the minimum requirements of the MMC and the LCP, including necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property and the proposed landscape plan for the developed property. The OWTS plot plan shall show essential features of the OWTS and must fit onto an 11 inch by 17 inch sheet leaving a five inch margin clear to provide space for a City applied legend. If the scale of the plans is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details and/or all necessary setbacks, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inches by 22 inches).
72. Final OWTS Design Report, Plans, and System Specifications: A final OWTS design report and large set of construction drawings with system specifications (four sets) shall be submitted to describe the OWTS design basis and all components proposed for use in the construction of the proposed OWTS.
73. All plans and reports must be signed by a City registered OWTS Designer, and the plans stamped by the project Geologist, Coastal Engineer, and Structural Engineer as applicable.
The final OWTS design report and construction drawings shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator with the designer’s signature, professional registration number, and stamp (if applicable).
74. The final OWTS design submittal shall contain the following information (in addition to the items listed above).
a. The model and capacity of the treatment tank(s) must be discussed in the final OWTS report and clearly shown on the final OWTS plans.
b. Confirm cap depth for seepage pit at LBA-5 on OWTS plan. c. Required treatment capacity for wastewater treatment and disinfection systems.
The treatment capacity shall be specified in terms of flow rate, gallons per day, and shall be supported by calculations relating the treatment capacity to the number of bedroom equivalents, plumbing drainage fixture equivalents, and the subsurface effluent dispersal system acceptance rate. The drainage fixture unit count must be clearly identified in association with the design treatment capacity, even if the design is based on the number of bedrooms. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the treatment system shall be specified in the final design. d. Sewage and effluent pump design calculations (as applicable). e. Description of proposed wastewater treatment and/or disinfection system equipment. State the proposed type of treatment system(s) (e.g., aerobic treatment, textile filter ultraviolet disinfection, etc.); major components, manufacturers, and model numbers for "package" systems; and conceptual design for custom engineered systems.
f. Specifications, supporting geology information, and percolation test results for the subsurface effluent dispersal portion of the onsite wastewater disposal system. This must include the proposed type of effluent dispersal system (drainfield, trench, seepage pit subsurface drip, etc.) as well as the system’s geometric dimensions and basic construction features. Supporting calculations shall be presented that relate DRAFT 255
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
the results of soils analysis or percolation/infiltration tests to the projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate, including any unit conversions or safety factors. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the effluent dispersal system shall be specified in the final design. The projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate shall be reported in units of total gallons per day and gallons per square foot per day. Specifications for the subsurface effluent dispersal system shall be shown to accommodate the design hydraulic loading rate (i.e., average and peak OWTS effluent flow, reported in units of gallons per day). The subsurface effluent dispersal system design must take into account the number of bedrooms, fixture units and building occupancy characteristics.
g. All OWTS design drawings shall be submitted with the wet signature and typed name of the OWTS designer. If the scale of the plan is such that more space than is available on the 11” x 17” plot plan is needed to clearly show construction details, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inch by 22 inch, for review by Environmental Health). Note: For OWTS final designs, full-size plans are required for review by Building Safety Division and the Planning Department.
75. Building Plans: All project architectural plans and grading/drainage plans shall be submitted for Environmental Health review and approval. These plans must be approved by the Building Safety Division prior to receiving Environmental Health final approval. The final floor plans must show all bedrooms and drainage fixtures in the proposed residence.
76. Proof of Ownership: Proof of ownership of subject property shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator.
77. Operations and Maintenance Manual: An operations and maintenance manual specified by the OWTS designer shall be submitted to the property owner and maintenance provider of the proposed OWTS.
78. Maintenance Contract: A maintenance contract executed between the owner of the subject property and an entity qualified in the opinion of the City of Malibu to maintain the proposed onsite wastewater disposal system after construction shall be submitted. Note only original “wet signature” documents are acceptable.
79. Advanced OWTS Covenant: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a covenant running with the land shall be executed between the City of Malibu and the holder of the fee simple absolute as to subject real property and recorded with the City of Malibu Recorder’s Office.
Said covenant shall serve as constructive notice to any future purchaser for value that the onsite wastewater treatment system serving the subject property is an advanced method of sewage disposal pursuant to the City of Environmental Health Administrator. The applicant shall submit a certified copy issued by the City of Malibu Recorder.
80. Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant Approval: Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.
DRAFT 256
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
81. City of Malibu Public Works Approval: City of Malibu Public Works final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.
82. City of Malibu Geologist/Geotechnical Approval: City of Malibu consulting geotechnical reviewers' final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.
83. City of Malibu Planning Approval: City of Malibu Planning Department final approval of the OWTS plan shall be obtained.
84. Environmental Health Final Review Fee: A final fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of the final approval shall be paid to the City of Malibu for Environmental Health review of the OWTS design and system specifications.
85. Operating Permit Application and Fee: In accordance with the MMC, an application shall be made to the Environmental Health office for an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System operating permit. An operating permit fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of final approval shall be submitted with the application.
Water Quality/Water Service
86. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an updated Will Serve Letter from Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 to the Planning Department indicating the ability of the property to receive adequate water service.
87. Prior to final inspection (or project sign-off, as applicable) by the Planning Department, the applicant shall demonstrate that all requirements of Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 have been met, including installation of a meter, if applicable.
88. A USC approved backflow device is required for this property and is to be installed and maintained by the property owner.
Deed Restrictions
89. The property owner is required to execute and record a deed restriction which shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs and expenses of liability arising out of the acquisition, design, construction, operation, maintenance, existence or failure of the permitted project in an area where an extraordinary potential for damage or destruction from wildfire exists as an inherent risk to life and property. The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to Planning department staff prior to final planning approval.
90. Prior to final Planning Department approval, the applicant shall be required to execute and record a deed restriction reflecting lighting requirements set forth in Condition No. 15. The DRAFT 257
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to the Planning Department prior to final Planning Department approval.
91. The garage area shall be limited to accessory use as defined by the City of Malibu LCP. The garage area cannot be converted into habitable space at any time in the future. Prior to issuance of building permits, the application is required to execute and record a deed restriction to this effect.
Prior to Occupancy
92. Prior to, or at the time of a Planning final inspection, the property owner / applicant shall submit to the Planning Department the plumbing permit for the irrigation system installation signed off by the Building Safety Division.
93. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the City Biologist shall inspect the project site and determine that all Planning Department conditions to protect natural resources are in compliance with the approved plans.
94. Prior to a final Building inspection, the applicant shall provide a Recycling Summary Report (Summary Report) and obtain the approval from the Environmental Sustainability Department.
Applicant must provide haul tickets and diversion information. The final Summary Report shall designate the specific materials that were land filled or recycled and state the facilities where all materials were taken.
95. The applicant shall request a final Planning Department inspection prior to final inspection by the City of Malibu Building Safety Division. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until the Planning Department has determined that the project complies with this coastal development permit. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be granted at the discretion of the Planning Director, provided adequate security has been deposited with the City to ensure compliance should the final work not be completed in accordance with this permit.
96. Any construction trailer, storage equipment or similar temporary equipment not permitted as part of the approved scope of work shall be removed prior to final inspection and approval, and if applicable, the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
Fixed Conditions
97. This coastal development permit amendment shall run with the land and bind all future owners of the property.
98. Violation of any of the conditions of this approval may be cause for revocation of this permit and termination of all rights granted there under.
DRAFT 258
Resolution No. 24-64
______________________
SECTION 6. The Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October 2024. __________________________________
DREW LEONARD, Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________________
REBECCA EVANS, Recording Secretary
LOCAL APPEAL - Pursuant to Local Coastal Program Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Section
13.20.1 (Local Appeals) a decision made by the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by an aggrieved person by written statement setting forth the grounds for appeal. An appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within 10 days and shall be accompanied by an appeal form and filing fee, as specified by the City Council. Appeal forms may be found online at www.malibucity.org, in person at City Hall, or by calling (310) 456-2489, ext. 246.
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 1.12.010 of the MMC and Code of Civil Procedure. Any person wishing to challenge the above action in Superior Court may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Malibu at or prior to the public hearing.
I CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION NO. 24-64 was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Malibu at the Regular meeting held on the 7th day of October 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
____________________________________
REBECCA EVANS, Recording Secretary
DRAFT 259
DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC. 2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202 SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
ATTACHMENT 2
260
A
-
0 .
1 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: dav di [email protected]
SITEPLAN
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
1 6
"
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 296.63'
281.18'
1 2
5 .
0 0
'
1 35
.00'
44.6'
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
1 9
5 1
9 0
1 8
51 8
017
5 1
7 016
516
0 1
5 5
1 5
0 1
4 5
1 4
013
513
01 2
512
0 D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
D
E
C
K
A
T
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
E
L
1 9
0 '
E
L
1 9
1 .
5 '
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
T
O
T
A
L
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
(
>
6 '
-
0 "
)
T
O
T
A
L
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
(
>
6 '
-
0 "
)
G
A
R
A
G
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
F
L
O
O
R
A
R
E
A
T
O
T
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
S
Q
U
A
R
E
F
O
O
T
A
G
E
2 ,
5 9
0 S
F
1 ,
4 6
0 S
F
4 ,
0 5
0 S
F
3 2
0 S
F
3 2
0 S
F
3 9
0 S
F
4 ,
7 6
0 S
F
A
C
S
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
L
L
C
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
O
W
N
E
R
2 9
3 2
9 H
E
A
T
H
E
R
C
L
I
F
F
R
O
A
D
M
A
L
I
B
U
,
C
A
9 0
2 6
5 P
R
O
J
E
C
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
A
P
N
4 4
6 8
-
0 1
1 -
0 1
1 N
D
E
N
O
T
E
S
F
I
R
E
T
U
R
N
-
A
R
O
U
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
R
O
O
F
R
O
O
F
>
1 8
'
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
<
2 0
"
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
>
1 8
'
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
<
2 1
.
5 "
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
R
O
O
F
A
R
E
A
T
A
B
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
4 ,
2 1
0 S
F
4 8
0 S
F
(
=
1 2
%
O
F
R
O
O
F
)
4 0
S
F
(
=
1 %
O
F
R
O
O
F
)
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
I
M
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
A
R
E
A
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
I
M
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
A
R
E
A
3 0
%
O
F
2 8
,
4 9
8 S
F
(
N
E
T
L
O
T
A
R
E
A
)
I
M
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
A
R
E
A
5 ,
2 7
5 S
F
8 ,
5 4
9 S
F
(
>
5 ,
2 7
5 S
F
)
1 7
.
4 '
S
I
D
EYA
R
D
S
ET
BAC
K
1 1.7
'
SID
EYA
R
D
S
ET
B
A
C
K
F
R
O
N
T
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
H
A
L
B
E
A
T
L
E
A
S
T
2 0
%
O
F
T
H
E
T
O
T
A
L
D
E
P
T
H
O
F
T
H
E
L
O
T
,
O
R
6 5
"
,
W
H
I
C
H
E
V
E
R
I
S
L
E
S
S
2 0
%
X
2 9
7 =
5 9
.
2 '
W
I
T
H
M
O
D
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
-
5 9
.
2 '
/
2 =
2 9
.
6 '
R
E
A
R
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
A
T
L
E
A
S
T
1 5
%
O
F
T
H
E
L
O
T
D
E
P
T
H
O
R
1 5
'
W
H
I
C
H
E
V
E
R
I
S
G
R
E
A
T
E
R
1 5
%
X
2 9
7 =
4 4
.
6 '
S
I
D
E
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
C
U
M
U
L
A
T
I
V
E
L
Y
A
T
L
E
A
S
T
2 5
%
O
F
T
H
E
T
O
T
A
L
W
I
D
T
H
O
F
T
H
E
L
O
T
B
U
T
,
I
N
N
O
E
V
E
N
T
,
S
H
A
L
L
A
S
I
N
G
L
E
S
I
D
E
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
B
E
L
E
S
S
T
H
A
N
1 0
%
O
F
T
H
E
W
I
D
T
H
O
F
T
H
E
L
O
T
O
R
5 '
,
W
H
I
C
H
E
V
E
R
I
S
G
R
E
A
T
E
R
2 5
%
X
1 1
6 .
1 '
=
2 9
.
1 '
,
1 1
.
7 '
M
I
N
+
1 7
.
4 '
=
2 9
.
1 '
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
S
L
O
P
E
I
S
1 T
O
1 S
L
O
P
E
T
0 4
T
O
1 S
L
O
P
E
>
1 T
O
1 S
L
O
P
E
E
L
1 9
8 .
0 '
D
E
N
O
T
E
S
R
O
O
F
>
1 8
'
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
<
2 4
'
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
<
4 T
O
1 S
L
O
P
E
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
A
-
0 .
1 A
-
0 .
2 A
-
1 .
1 A
-
1 .
2 A
-
1 .
3 A
-
2 .
1 A
-
2 .
2 A
-
3 .
1 A
-
3 .
2 A
-
3 .
3 L
-
1 .
1 L
-
1 .
2 C
-
1 C
-
2 C
-
3 C
-
4 C
-
F
D
I
N
D
E
X
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
T
O
T
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
S
Q
U
A
R
E
F
O
O
T
A
G
E
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
R
O
O
F
P
L
A
N
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
P
L
A
N
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
F
I
R
E
A
C
C
E
S
S
E
X
H
I
B
I
T
S
U
R
V
E
Y
S
U
R
V
E
Y
S
L
O
P
E
B
A
N
D
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
1 )
M
O
D
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
F
O
R
F
R
O
N
T
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
-
R
E
D
U
C
E
F
R
O
N
T
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
T
O
2 9
.
6 '
(
S
E
E
F
R
O
N
T
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
)
D
I
S
C
R
E
T
I
O
N
A
R
Y
A
C
T
I
O
N
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
S
E
E
P
A
G
E
P
I
T
4 '
D
I
A
M
4 0
'
D
E
E
P
1 0
'
C
A
P
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
F
U
T
U
R
E
S
E
E
P
A
G
E
P
I
T
4 '
D
I
A
M
5 0
'
D
E
E
P
1 9
'
C
A
PPR
O
P
O
S
E
D
2 ,
5 0
0 G
A
L
S
E
P
T
I
C
T
A
N
K
8 '
M
I
N
8 '
M
I
N
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
D
I
S
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
N
O
T
E
:
T
D
S
F
i
s
t
h
e
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
s
p
a
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
a
n
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
i
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
n
d
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
w
a
l
l
s
,
f
i
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
s
,
v
e
rt
i
c
a
l
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
c
h
a
s
e
s
/v
o
i
d
e
d
s
p
a
c
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
w
a
l
l
s
,
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
p
a
t
i
o
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
h
a
n
g
s
w
i
t
h
a
d
e
p
t
h
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
s
i
x
f
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
e
d
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
r
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
6 0
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
e
n
c
l
o
s
e
d
b
y
w
a
l
l
s
,
a
n
d
c
r
a
w
l
s
p
a
c
e
s
w
i
t
h
a
c
e
i
l
i
n
g
h
e
i
g
h
t
i
n
e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
s
i
x
fe
e
t
)
.
S
t
a
i
r
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
e
l
e
v
a
t
o
r
s
h
a
ft
s
a
r
e
c
o
u
n
t
e
d
o
n
c
e
o
n
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
f
l
o
o
r
o
n
l
y
.
LOT
W
I
DTH
-
1 1
6 '
-
1 "
LOT DEPTH - 297'-2"
N
E
W
S
I
N
G
L
E
F
A
M
I
L
Y
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
U
P
P
E
R
L
E
V
E
L
F
F
E
L
1 8
9 .
2 5
'
L
O
W
E
R
L
E
V
E
L
F
F
E
L
1 7
9 '
P
A
T
I
O
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
'
P
A
T
I
O
E
L
1 7
8 .
5 0
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
6 .
0 0
'
R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
'
G
R
O
S
S
S
I
T
E
A
R
E
A
N
E
T
S
I
T
E
A
R
E
A
S
I
T
E
A
R
E
A
S
3 3
,
5 3
2 S
F
2 8
,
4 9
8 S
F
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
F
L
O
O
R
A
R
E
A
2 1
,
7 8
0 S
F
X
.
1 7
7 =
3 ,
8 5
5 +
1 ,
0 0
0 =
4 ,
8 5
5 S
F
2 8
,
4 9
8 S
F
(
A
R
E
A
O
F
S
I
T
E
G
R
E
A
T
E
R
T
H
A
N
1 :
1 S
L
O
P
E
)
-
2 1
,
7 8
0 S
F
=
6 ,
7 1
8 S
F
X
.
1 0
=
6 7
2 S
F
4 ,
8 5
5 S
F
+
6 7
2 S
F
=
5 ,
5 2
7 S
F
(
<
5 ,
5 2
7 S
F
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
)
MAY 29, 2024
8'-6" 7'-6"
1 8
'
-
0 "
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
P
A
C
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
P
A
C
E
29.6'
FRONT YARD SETBACK
1 5
'
-
0 "
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
(
>
6 '
-
0 "
)
T
O
T
A
L
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
2 /
3 R
U
L
E
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
2 ,
5 9
0 S
F
3 2
0 S
F
2 8
1 0
S
F
1 ,
8 5
0 S
F
8 0
'
-
8 "
55'-3"
6 5
%
(
<
2 /
3 O
F
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
A
R
E
A
) NO
T
E
:
C
l
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
o
f
b
r
u
s
h
a
n
d
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
v
e
g
r
o
w
t
h
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
p
e
r
F
i
r
e
C
o
d
e
3 2
5 N
O
T
E
:
A
l
l
r
o
o
f
c
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
C
l
a
s
s
"
"
A
"
"
a
s
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
1 5
0 5
.
1 .
1 (
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
3 2
7 .
5 .
2 &
R
9 0
2 )
5 '
-
0 "
M
I
N
F
I
R
E
P
A
T
H
<
4 T
O
1 S
L
O
P
E
T
O
T
A
L
D
I
S
T
U
R
B
E
D
A
R
E
A
:
1 0
,
2 3
1 S
F
N
E
W
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
E
A
N
E
W
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
6 ,
8 4
0 S
F
181'-0"
REAR SETBACK
>44.6"
MIN ALLOWABLE
8 '
M
I
N
5 '
M
I
N
5 '-0
"
M
I
N
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
S
t
e
p
s
p
a
v
e
w
a
l
k
w
a
y
s
p
r
oj
e
c
t
i
n
t
o
a
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
y
a
r
d
u
p
t
o
a
p
o
i
n
t
n
o
t
c
l
o
s
e
rt
h
a
n
t
h
r
e
e
fe
e
t
t
o
a
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
H
e
i
g
h
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
a
i
l
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
n
o
t
e
x
c
e
e
d
s
i
x
fe
e
t
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
g
r
a
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
rt
y
l
i
n
e
.
T
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
n
o
b
a
l
c
o
n
i
e
s
,
d
e
c
k
s
,
t
e
r
r
a
c
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
s
i
x
fe
e
t
a
b
o
v
e
g
r
a
d
e
w
i
t
h
-
i
n
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
n
o
o
p
e
n
,
u
n
e
n
c
l
o
s
e
d
f
i
r
e
e
s
c
a
p
e
s
a
n
d
f
i
r
e
p
r
o
o
f
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
w
i
t
h
-
i
n
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
G
r
o
u
n
d
-
m
o
u
n
t
e
d
p
o
o
l
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
i
r
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
e
r
s
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
t
-
i
n
b
a
r
b
e
c
u
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
w
i
t
h
-
i
n
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
y
a
r
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
.
D
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
,
w
a
l
kw
a
y
s
,
p
a
t
i
o
s
l
a
b
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
a
r
e
a
s
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
o
f
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
,
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
o
r
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
d
o
n
o
t
e
x
c
e
e
d
o
n
e
f
o
o
t
a
b
o
v
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
.
D
e
c
k
s
o
v
e
r
o
n
e
fo
o
t
h
i
g
h
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
e
d
b
y
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
3 .
5 .
3 (
B
)
(
3 )
o
f
t
h
e
M
a
l
i
b
u
L
I
P
.
3 '
-
0 "
3 '
-
0 "
261
N
I
Q
S
M
p
c
P
V
M
p
c
p
b
`
l
k
a
c
i
l
l
o
d
^
o
^
d
b
^
J
M
K
O
a^sfa hbiibk H ^ppl`f^qbpI fk`K
OTMN ^ of mloq ^sbkrbI prfqb @OMO
p^kq^ jlk `f ^I `^ VMQMR
qbibmelkb PNM OQRJPRUQ
b j^fiW Ç~îáÇâÉääÉåNNT]Öã~áäKÅçã
qlq^i absbilmjbkq
pnr^ob cllq^db
p
`
^
i
b
W
N
L
U
?
Z
N
D
J
M
?
O
obpfabk`b il`^qba ^qW
OVPOV eb^qe`ifcc ol^a
j^if_rI `^ VMOSR
q
l
q
^
i
a
b
s
b
i
l
m
j
b
k
q
p
n
r
^
o
b
c
l
l
q
^
d
b
p
b
`
l
k
a
c
i
l
l
o
p
`
^
i
b
W
N
L
U
?
Z
N
D
J
M
?
N
q
l
q
^
i
a
b
s
b
i
l
m
j
b
k
q
p
n
r
^
o
b
c
l
l
q
^
d
b
c
f
o
p
q
c
i
l
l
o
N
p
q
c
i
l
l
o
a
t
b
i
i
f
k
d
J
O
I
R
V
M
p
c
l
s
b
o
e
^
k
d
b
[
S
D
J
M
?
P
O
M
p
c
pbmqbj_bo ONI OMO
O
I
R
V
M
p
c
P
P
O
M
p
c
O
I
V
N
M
p
c
c
f
o
p
q
c
i
l
l
o
l
s
b
o
e
^
k
d
b
E
[
S
D
J
M
?
F
q
l
q
^
i
c
f
o
p
q
c
i
l
l
o
p
b
`
l
k
a
c
i
l
l
o
q
l
q
^
i
a
t
b
i
i
f
k
d
c
f
o
p
q
c
i
l
l
o
l
s
b
o
e
^
k
d
E
[
S
D
J
M
?
F
q
l
q
^
i
l
s
b
o
e
^
k
d
E
[
S
D
J
M
?
F
d
^
o
^
d
b
m
o
l
m
l
p
b
a
c
i
l
l
o
^
o
b
^
q
l
q
^
i
a
b
s
b
i
l
m
j
b
k
q
p
n
r
^
o
b
c
l
l
q
^
d
b
O
I
R
V
M
p
c
N
I
Q
S
M
p
c
Q
I
M
R
M
p
c
P
O
M
p
c
P
O
M
p
c
P
V
M
p
c
Q
I
T
S
M
p
c
^
i
i
l
t
^
_
i
b
c
i
l
l
o
^
o
b
^
O
N
I
T
U
M
p
c
u
K
N
T
T
Z
P
I
U
R
R
H
N
I
M
M
M
Z
Q
I
U
R
R
p
c
O
U
N
M
N
p
c
E
^
o
b
^
l
c
p
f
q
b
d
o
b
^
q
b
o
q
e
^
k
N
W
N
p
i
l
m
b
F
J
O
N
I
T
U
M
p
c
Z
S
I
P
O
N
p
c
u
K
N
M
Z
S
P
O
p
c
Q
I
U
R
R
p
c
H
S
P
O
p
c
Z
R
I
Q
U
T
p
c
E
Y
R
I
Q
U
T
p
c
^
i
i
l
t
^
_
i
b
F
O
k
a
c
i
l
l
o
a
t
b
i
i
f
k
d
J
N
I
Q
S
M
p
c
d
^
o
^
d
b
J
P
V
M
p
c
262
A
-
1 .
1 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 G
A
R
A
G
E
L
I
V
I
N
G
/
D
I
N
I
N
G
E
N
T
R
Y
A
-
3 .
2 A
-
3 .
3 1
A
-
3 .
3 2
1 P
A
N
T
R
Y
D
E
C
K
1 2
F
F
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
F
F
E
L
1 9
1 .
0 0
'
D
N
A
-
3 .
2 2
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
N
APRIL 1, 2024
T
R
E
L
L
I
S
N
O
T
I
N
C
L
U
D
E
D
I
N
A
R
E
A
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
F
F
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
S
W
I
M
M
I
N
G
P
O
O
L
E
L
1 8
5 .
5 0
-
B
O
T
T
O
M
E
L
1 8
9 .
6 0
-
T
O
P
O
F
W
A
T
E
R
AB
5 3
'
-
7 "
1 9
'
-
6 "
7 3
'
-
1 "
34'-10"
21'-0"
D
E
C
K
B
E
L
O
W
S
E
E
A
-
1 .
2 D
E
C
K
B
E
L
O
W
S
E
E
A
-
1 .
2 CDE
S
DCM
S
D
D
E
N
O
T
E
S
S
M
O
K
E
D
E
T
E
C
T
O
R
C
M
W
H
E
N
M
O
R
E
T
H
A
N
O
N
E
S
M
O
K
E
A
L
A
R
M
I
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
T
O
B
E
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
W
I
T
H
I
N
A
N
D
I
N
D
I
V
I
D
U
A
L
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
U
N
I
T
T
H
E
A
L
A
R
M
D
E
V
I
E
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
I
N
T
E
R
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
E
D
I
N
S
U
C
HA
M
A
N
N
E
R
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
A
C
T
U
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
O
N
E
A
L
A
R
M
W
I
L
L
A
C
T
I
V
A
T
E
A
L
L
O
F
T
H
E
A
L
A
R
M
S
I
N
T
H
E
I
N
D
I
V
I
D
U
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
M
O
K
E
A
L
A
R
M
S
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
C
E
I
V
E
T
H
E
I
R
P
R
I
M
A
R
Y
P
O
W
E
R
F
R
O
M
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
W
I
R
I
N
G
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
T
H
A
T
S
U
C
H
W
I
R
I
N
G
I
S
S
E
R
V
E
D
F
R
O
M
A
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
S
O
U
R
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
E
Q
U
I
P
P
E
D
W
I
T
H
A
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
B
A
C
K
U
P
D
E
N
O
T
E
S
C
A
R
B
O
N
M
O
N
O
X
I
D
E
A
L
A
R
M
W
H
E
N
M
O
R
E
T
H
A
N
O
N
E
C
A
R
B
O
N
M
O
N
O
X
I
D
E
A
L
A
R
M
I
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
T
O
B
E
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
W
I
T
H
I
N
A
N
D
I
N
D
I
V
I
D
U
A
L
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
U
N
I
T
T
H
E
A
L
A
R
M
D
E
V
I
E
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
I
N
T
E
R
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
E
D
I
N
S
U
C
H
A
M
A
N
N
E
R
T
H
A
T
T
H
E
A
C
T
U
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
O
N
E
A
L
A
R
M
W
I
L
L
A
C
T
I
V
A
T
E
A
L
L
O
F
T
H
E
A
L
A
R
M
S
I
N
T
H
E
I
N
D
I
V
I
D
U
A
L
U
N
I
T
C
A
R
B
O
N
M
O
N
O
X
I
D
E
A
L
A
R
M
S
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
C
E
I
V
E
T
H
E
I
R
P
R
I
M
A
R
Y
P
O
W
E
R
F
R
O
M
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
W
I
R
I
N
G
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
T
H
A
T
S
U
C
H
W
I
R
I
N
G
I
S
S
E
R
V
E
D
F
R
O
M
A
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
S
O
U
R
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
E
Q
U
I
P
P
E
D
W
I
T
H
A
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
B
A
C
K
U
P
C
A
R
B
O
N
M
O
N
O
X
I
D
E
A
L
A
R
M
S
S
H
A
L
B
E
L
I
S
T
E
D
A
S
C
O
M
P
L
Y
I
N
G
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
U
L
2 0
3 4
.
C
A
R
B
O
N
M
O
N
O
X
I
D
E
D
E
T
E
C
T
O
R
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
L
I
S
T
E
D
A
S
C
O
M
P
L
Y
I
N
G
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
U
L
2 0
7 5
D
O
O
R
N
O
T
E
S
:
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
D
O
O
R
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
I
E
S
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
N
F
O
R
M
T
O
P
E
R
F
O
M
A
N
C
E
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
F
M
1 2
-
7 A
-
1 (
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
C
O
D
E
R
3 2
7 .
8 .
3 A
N
D
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
C
O
D
E
7 0
8 A
.
3 )
W
I
N
D
O
W
N
O
T
E
S
:
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
,
W
I
N
D
O
W
W
A
L
L
S
,
G
L
A
Z
E
D
D
O
O
R
A
N
D
G
L
A
Z
E
D
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
S
W
I
T
H
I
N
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
D
O
O
R
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
M
U
L
T
I
-
P
A
N
E
G
L
A
Z
I
N
G
U
N
I
T
S
W
I
T
H
A
M
I
N
I
M
U
M
O
F
O
N
E
T
E
M
P
E
R
E
D
P
A
N
E
N
o
t
e
:
D
e
c
k
i
n
g
,
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
s
,
s
t
a
i
r
t
r
e
a
d
s
,
r
i
s
e
r
s
,
a
n
dl
a
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
d
e
c
k
s
,
p
o
r
c
h
e
s
,
a
n
d
b
a
l
c
o
n
i
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
a
n
y
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
u
c
h
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
i
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
1 0
f
e
e
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
y
w
i
t
h
u
s
e
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
n
o
n
c
o
m
b
u
s
t
i
b
l
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
(
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
3 2
7 .
9 .
1 a
n
d
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
gC
o
d
e
7 0
9 A
.
3 )
A
-
3 .
2 1
A
-
2 .
1 1
A
-
2 .
1 2
A
-
2 .
2 1
263
A-1.2
D
A
VID
K
E
L
L
E
N
+
A
S
S
O
CIA
T
E
S, IN
C. 2
7 01 AIR
P
O
R
T
A
V
E
N
U
E, S
UIT
E
#
2 0
2 S
A
N
T
A
M
O
N
CI A, C
A
9 0
4 0
5 T
E
L
E
P
H
O
N
E
310
2 4
5-3
5 8
4 E
M
AIL: d
a
vid
k
elle
n117
@
g
m
ail.c
o
m
F
RI S
T
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1
N
APRIL 1, 2024
A
B
C
D
E
SD DENOTES SMOKE DETECTOR
CM
WHEN MORE THAN ONE SMOKE ALARM
IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN
AND INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNIT THE
ALARM DEVIES SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED
IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THE ACTUATION
OF ONE ALARM WILL ACTIVATE ALL OF THE ALARMS
IN THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT
SMOKE ALARMS SHALL RECEIVE
THEIR PRIMARY POWER FROM THE BUILDING
WIRING PROVIDED THAT SUCH WIRING IS SERVED FROM A
COMMERCIAL SOURCE AND
SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A BATTERY BACKUP
DENOTES CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM
WHEN MORE THAN ONE CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM
IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN
AND INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNIT THE
ALARM DEVIES SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED
IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THE ACTUATION
OF ONE ALARM WILL ACTIVATE ALL OF THE ALARMS
IN THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT
CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL RECEIVE
THEIR PRIMARY POWER FROM THE BUILDING
WIRING PROVIDED THAT SUCH WIRING IS SERVED FROM A
COMMERCIAL SOURCE AND
SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A BATTERY BACKUP
CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHAL BE LISTED
AS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
UL 2034. CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS
SHALL BE LISTED AS COMPLYING WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF UL 2075
Note:
Decking, surfaces, stair treads, risers, and landings of decks, porches, and balconies where any portion of such surface is within 10 feet of the primary structure shall comply with use of approved noncombustible construction (Residential Code R327.9.1 and Building Code 709A.3)
DOOR NOTES:
EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL CONFORM TO
PERFOMANCE STANDARD SFM 12-7A-1
(RESIDENTIAL CODE R327.8.3 AND
BUILDING CODE 708A.3)
WINDOW NOTES:
EXTERIOR WINDOWS, WINDOW WALLS,
GLAZED DOOR AND GLAZED OPENINGS
WITHIN EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE
MULTI-PANE GLAZING UNITS WITH A
MINIMUM OF ONE TEMPERED PANE
EXTERIOR DECK
AT GRADE
FF EL 179.30'
A-3.2
1 A-2.1
1 A-2.1
2 A-2.2
1 2 1
SEE LANDSCAPE
PLAN
FF EL 179.00'
EXTERIOR DECK
AT GRADE
FF EL 179.90'
EXTERIOR DECK
AT GRADE
FF EL 177.50'
SIDEYARD
SET BACK
SIDEYARD
SET BACK
UP
A-3.3
2 1
A-3.3
A-3.2
2 DECK ABOVE
< 6'-0" OVERHANG TYP.
NOT IN AREA CALCULATIONS
DECK ABOVE/POOL
>6'-0" OVERHANG TYP.
INCLUDED IN AREA CALCULATIONS
3 8'-4"
78'-4"
72'-11"
SD
CM
SD
SD
CM SD
FF EL 180.00'
S
L
O
P
E
D
O
W
N
1/4" / 1'-0"
EXTERIOR DECK
AT GRADE
FF EL 179.30'
78'-4"
SD SD
BEDROOM 4 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 1
LAUNDRY
264
A
-
1 .
3 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]
ROOF PLAN
R
O
O
F
P
L
A
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 1
2 D
E
C
K
B
E
L
O
W
B
UR
O
O
F
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
'
B
U
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
B
U
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
S
I
D
E
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
I
D
E
Y
A
R
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
A
-
3 .
2 A
-
3 .
3 1
A
-
3 .
3 2
1 A
-
3 .
2 2
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
N
1 9
5 1
9 0
1 8
5 E
L
1 9
0 '
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
P
A
T
I
O
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
'
P
A
T
I
O
E
L
1 7
8 .
5 0
1 9
0 1
8 5
1 8
0 T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
E
L
1 8
4 .
0 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
E
L
1 9
7 .
0 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
E
L
1 8
2 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
S
L
O
P
E
D
N
1 /
4 =
1 '
-
0 "
SLOPE DN
1/4 = 1'-0"
SLOPE DN
1/4 = 1'-0"
S
L
O
P
E
D
N
1 /
4 =
1 '
-
0 "
E
L
1 8
1 .
0 0
APRIL 1, 2024
ABCDE
N
O
T
E
:
R
O
O
F
G
U
T
T
E
R
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
W
I
H
T
A
M
E
A
N
S
T
O
P
R
E
V
E
N
T
T
H
E
A
C
C
U
M
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
L
E
A
V
E
S
A
N
D
D
E
B
R
I
S
I
N
T
H
E
G
U
T
T
E
R
N
O
T
E
:
A
l
l
r
o
o
f
c
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
C
l
a
s
s
"
"
A
"
"
a
s
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
1 5
0 5
.
1 .
1 (
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
3 2
7 .
5 .
2 &
R
9 0
2 )
A
-
2 .
1 1
A
-
2 .
1 2
A
-
2 .
2 1
T
.
O
.
C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 8
9 .
9 T
.
O
.
R
A
I
L
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
3 .
4 T
.
O
.
C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 8
9 .
9 T
.
O
.
R
A
I
L
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
3 .
4 T
.
O
.
C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 8
9 .
9 T
.
O
.
R
A
I
L
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
3 .
4 T
.
O
.
C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 8
9 .
9 T
.
O
.
R
A
I
L
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
3 .
4 T
.
O
.
C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
1 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
1 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
1 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
C
O
P
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
T
.
O
.
R
A
I
L
I
N
G
E
L
1 9
3 .
5 T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
N
O
T
E
:
N
O
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
O
N
R
O
O
F
F
A
U
'
S
W
I
L
L
B
E
L
O
C
A
T
E
D
O
N
L
O
W
E
R
L
E
V
E
L
C
O
N
D
E
N
S
E
R
S
U
N
D
E
R
P
O
O
L
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0 B
U
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
265
A
-
2 .
1 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]
SECTIONS RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
APRIL 1, 2024
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 18'-0"
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
D
E
C
K
G
A
R
A
G
E
M
A
S
T
E
R
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
'
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
1 8
'
-
0 "
A
B
O
V
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
4"
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
2 E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
D
E
C
K
K
I
T
C
H
E
N
P
A
T
I
O
F
A
M
I
L
Y
R
O
O
M
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
1 8
'
-
0 "
A
B
O
V
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
7"
18'-0"
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
15 -' 10"
13'-1"
14'-8"
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
17'-10"
16'-7"
266
A
-
2 .
2 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]
SECTIONS RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
APRIL 1, 2024
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 P
A
T
I
O
L
I
V
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 L
I
V
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
D
E
C
K
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
1 8
'
-
0 "
A
B
O
V
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
'
18'-0"
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
17 -' 8"
14'-2"
16'-5"
8"
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
267
A
-
3 .
2 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]
ELEVATIONS
E
A
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
2 E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
R
A
D
E
F
I
N
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
APRIL 1, 2024
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
18'-0"
S
T
U
C
C
O
2 X
6 @
1 6
"
O
C
F
I
R
E
B
L
O
C
K
I
N
G
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
5 /
8 "
T
Y
P
E
X
G
Y
P
.
B
D
.
I
G
N
I
T
I
O
N
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
D
E
T
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
3 N
O
T
E
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
w
a
l
l
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
.
17'-9"
P
O
O
L
E
Q
U
I
P
12'-11"
11'-0"
11'-2"
1 8
'
-
0 "
A
B
O
V
E
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
.
S
E
E
D
E
T
3 F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
N
A
T
G
R
A
D
E
15'-4"
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
E
L
1 8
0 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
268
A
-
3 .
3 DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE, SUITE #202
SANTA MON CI A, CA 90405
TELEPHONE 310 245-3584
E MAIL: [email protected]
ELEVATIONS
S
O
U
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
1 RESIDENCE LOCATED AT:
29329 HEATHCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU, CA 90265
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
.
S
E
E
D
E
T
3 APRIL 1, 2024
2 X
6 @
1 6
"
O
C
F
I
R
E
B
L
O
C
K
I
N
G
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
5 /
8 "
T
Y
P
E
X
G
Y
P
.
B
D
.
I
G
N
I
T
I
O
N
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
T
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
D
E
T
3 N
O
T
E
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
w
a
l
l
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
.
W
E
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1 /
4 "
=
1 '
-
0 "
2 F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
N
A
T
U
R
A
L
G
R
A
D
E
8"
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
N
A
T
U
R
A
L
G
R
A
D
E
14'-6"
15'-6"
11'-0"
16'-6"
FROM
NAT GRADE
13'-4"
12'-3"
8'-9"
11'-6"
17'-6"
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
V
E
R
T
I
C
A
L
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
I
N
G
T
Y
P
.
S
E
E
D
E
T
3 F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
N
A
T
U
R
A
L
G
R
A
D
E
1 8
'
-
0 "
A
B
O
V
E
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
DG
R
A
D
E
18'-0"
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
E
L
1 9
0 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
0 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
2 0
5 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
18'-0"
18'-0"
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
5 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
E
L
1 9
9 .
0 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
E
L
2 0
1 .
5 0
'
269
45. ALL TRENCH BACKFILLS SHALL BE TESTED AND APPROVED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER. 46. ENGINEER MUST SET GRADE STAKES FOR ALL DRAINAGE DEVICES AND OBTAIN INSPECTION BEFORE POURING. 47. STOCKPILING OF EXCESS MATERIAL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 48. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE STATEMENT TO THE GRADING INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 3318.1 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING CODE AT THE COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. 49. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT VERIFYING THAT THE WORK DONE UNDER HIS DIRECTION WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND REQUIREMENTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING CODE OR DESCRIBING ALL VARIANCES FROM THE APPROVED PLANS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE. 50. THE FIELD ENGINEER, AS A CONDITION OF ROUGH GRADE APPROVAL, SHALL PROVIDE A BLUE TOP WITH ACCOMPANYING WITNESS STAKE, SET AT THE CENTER OF EACH PAD REFLECTING THE PAD ELEVATION FOR PRECISE PERMITS AND A BLUE TOP WITH WITNESS STAKE SET AT THE DRAINAGE SWALE HIGH POINT REFLECTING THE HIGH POINT ELEVATION FOR PRELIMINARY PERMITS. 51. ANY EXCAVATIONS ADJACENT TO OTHER PROPERTY OR STRUCTURES ARE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE, SECTION 832, AND IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE AND/OR OWNER. 52. ALL GRADED SITES MUST HAVE DRAINAGE SWALES, BERMS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE DEVICES INSTALLED PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL. PER SECTION 3317.6 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING CODE. 53. FINAL GRADING MUST BE APPROVED BEFORE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS WILL BE ALLOWED PER SECTION 3318 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING CODE. 54. EXISTING UNCERTIFIED FILL SHALL NOT BE USED FOR SUPPORT OF FOOTINGS, FLOOR SLAB, OR OTHER PROPOSED FILL. 55. FILL SHALL NOT BE PLACED UNTIL THE COUNTY INSPECTOR HAS INSPECTED AND APPROVED THE BOTTOM. 56. ALL FILLS USED TO SUPPORT THE FOUNDATIONS OF ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLACED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, AND THE PLACEMENT OF THE FILL SHALL BE OBSERVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR HIS QUALIFIED REPRESENTATIVE. A COMPACTION REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW UPON COMPLETION OF WORK (UBC APPENDIX 3317). 57. COMPACTED FILL SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE FOOTINGS A MINIMUM DISTANCE EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE FILL BELOW THE FOOTING. 58. ALL FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY (UBC APPENDIX 3313.4). 59. GRADING SHALL NOT BE STARTED WITHOUT FIRST NOTIFING THE GRADING INSPECTOR. A PRE-GRADING MEETING ON THE SITE IS REQUIRED BEFORE START OF GRADING WITH THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE PRESENT: OWNER, GRADING CONTRACTOR, DESIGN CIVIL ENGINEER, SOIL ENGINEER, GEOLOGIST AND GRADING INSPECTOR. THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS FOR GRADING WILL BE EXPLAINED AT THIS MEETING 60. THE ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT A LETTER OF CERTIFICATION TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL STATING THAT THE GRADING WAS DINE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO APPENDIX CHAPTER 33 AND CHAPTER 71 (LATEST EDITION) OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THESE PLANS. 2. ANY MODIFICATIONS OF OR CHANGES TO APPROVED GRADING PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 3. NO GRADING SHALL BE STARTED WITHOUT FIRST NOTIFYING THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. A PRE-GRADING MEETING AT THE SITE IS REQUIRED BEFORE THE START OF THE GRADING WITH THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE PRESENT: OWNER, GRADING CONTRACTOR, DESIGN CIVIL ENGINEER, SOILS ENGINEER, GEOLOGIST, COUNTY GRADING INSPECTOR(S) OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES, AND WHEN REQUIRED THE ARCHEOLOGIST OR OTHER JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. PERMITTEE OR HIS AGENT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING PRE-GRADE MEETING AND MUST NOTIFY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AT LEAST TWO BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO PROPOSED PRE-GRADE MEETING. 4. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS REFLECT SOLELY THE REVIEW OF PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY POSITION BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES OR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS REGARDING THE STATUS OF ANY TITLE ISSUES RELATING TO THE LAND ON WHICH THE IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED. ANY DISPUTES RELATING TO TITLE ARE SOLELY A PRIVATE MATTER NOT INVOLVING THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES OR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 5. ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CODE, TITLE 12, SECTION 12.12.030 THAT CONTROLS AND RESTRICTS NOISE FROM THE USE OF CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING EQUIPMENT FROM THE HOURS OF 8:00 PM TO 6:30 AM, AND ON SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS. (MORE RESTRICTIVE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TIMES MAY GOVERN, AS REQUIRED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING AND SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLANS WHEN APPLICABLE.) 6. CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE (SECTION 5097.98) AND HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE (SECTION 7050.5) ADDRESS THE DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITION OF HUMAN REMAINS. IN THE EVENT OF DISCOVERY OR RECOGNITION OF ANY HUMAN REMAINS IN ANY LOCATION OTHER THAN A DEDICATED CEMETERY, THE LAW REQUIRES THAT GRADING IMMEDIATELY STOPS AND NO FURTHER EXCAVATION OR DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE, OR ANY NEARBY AREA WHERE HUMAN REMAINS MAY BE LOCATED, OCCUR UNTIL THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN: a. THE COUNTY CORONER HAS BEEN INFORMED AND HAS DETERMINED THAT NO INVESTIGATION OF THE CAUSE OF DEATH IS REQUIRED, AND b. IF THE REMAINS ARE OF NATIVE AMERICAN ORIGIN, THE DESCENDANTS FROM THE DECEASED NATIVE AMERICANS HAVE MADE A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE MEANS OF TREATING OR DISPOSING, WITH APPROPRIATE DIGNITY, OF THE HUMAN REMAINS AND ANY ASSOCIATED GRAVE GOODS. 7. THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE. 8. ALL EXPORT OF MATERIAL FROM THE SITE MUST GO TO A PERMITTED SITE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR A LEGAL DUMPSITE. RECEIPTS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF EXCESS MATERIAL BY A DUMPSITE ARE REQUIRED AND MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL UPON REQUEST. 9. A COPY OF THE GRADING PERMIT AND APPROVED GRADING PLANS MUST BE IN THE POSSESSION OF A RESPONSIBLE PERSON AND AVAILABLE AT THE SITE AT ALL TIMES. 10. SITE BOUNDARIES, EASEMENTS, DRAINAGE DEVICES, RESTRICTED USE AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED PER CONSTRUCTION STAKING BY FIELD ENGINEER OR LICENSED SURVEYOR. PRIOR TO GRADING, AS REQUESTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ALL PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, AND RESTRICTED USE AREAS SHALL BE STAKED. 11. NO GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE OF ANY OAK TREE AS REQUIRED PER TITLE CHAPTER 22.56 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ZONING CODE. THE PROTECTED ZONE SHALL MEAN THAT AREA WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF AN OAK TREE EXTENDING THERE FROM A POINT AT LEAST FIVE FEET OUTSIDE THE DRIP LINE, OR 15 FEET FROM THE TRUNK(S) OF A TREE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 12. THE STANDARD RETAINING WALL DETAILS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLANS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. STANDARD RETAINING WALLS ARE NOT CHECKED, PERMITTED, OR INSPECTED PER THE GRADING PERMIT. A SEPARATE RETAINING WALL PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL STANDARD RETAINING WALLS. THIS NOTE ONLY APPLIES TO STANDARD RETAINING WALLS. GEOGRID FABRIC AND SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS DO NOT REQUIRE A SEPARATE RETAINING WAIL PERMIT. DETAILS AND CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR ALL GEOGRID WALLS MUST BE ON THE GRADING PLAN. 13. A PREVENTIVE PROGRAM TO PROTECT THE SLOPES FROM POTENTIAL DAMAGE FROM BURROWING RODENTS IS REQUIRED PER SECTION 3307.6 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE. OWNER IS TO INSPECT SLOPES PERIODICALLY FOR EVIDENCE OF BURROWING RODENTS AND A FIRST EVIDENCE OF THEIR EXISTENCE SHALL EMPLOY AN EXTERMINATOR FOR THEIR REMOVAL. 14. NO GRADING AUTHORIZED BY THIS PLAN THROUGH THE RAINY SEASON, NOVEMBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 15. 15. TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY: IF THE CIVIL ENGINEER, THE SOILS ENGINEER, OR THE ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST OF RECORD IS CHANGED DURING GRADING, THE WORK SHALL BE STOPPED UNTIL THE REPLACEMENT HAS AGREED IN WRITING TO ACCEPT THEIR RESPONSIBILITY WITHIN THE AREA OF TECHNICAL COMPETENCE FOR APPROVAL UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE PERMITTEE TO NOTIFY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN WRITING OF SUCH CHANGE PRIOR TO THE RECOMMENCEMENT OF SUCH GRADING. INSPECTION NOTES: 16. THE PERMITTEE OR HIS AGENT SHALL NOTIFY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AT LEAST ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AT FOLLOWING STAGES OF THE WORK. (SECTION 3317 OF THE BUILDING CODE.) (a) INITIAL. WHEN THE SITE HAS BEEN CLEARED OF VEGETATION AND UNAPPROVED FILL HAS BEEN SCARIFIED, BENCHED OR OTHERWISE PREPARED FOR FILL. FILL SHALL NOT BE PLACED PRIOR TO THIS INSPECTION. NOTE: PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING GRADING, ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES INCLUDING EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WHICH CONTAIN SEDIMENTS MUST BE INSTALLED. (b) ROUGH WHEN APPROXIMATE FINAL ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED; DRAINAGE TERRACES, SWALES AND BERMS INSTALLED AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE; AND THE STATEMENTS REQUIRED IN THIS SECTION HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. (c) FINAL. WHEN GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED; ALL DRAINAGE DEVICES INSTALLED; SLOPE PLANTING ESTABLISHED, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS INSTALLED AND THE AS-BUILT PLANS, REQUIRED STATEMENTS, AND REPORTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED. 17. IN ADDITION TO THE INSPECTION REQUIRED OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR REGULAR GRADING, REPORTS AND STATEMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 3317 AND 3318 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE. 18. ALL GRADED SITES MUST HAVE DRAINAGE SWALES, BERMS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE DEVICES INSTALLED PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL. PER SECTION 3317.6 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE. 19. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE STATEMENT TO THE GRADING INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 3318.1 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE AT THE COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. 20. FINAL GRADING MUST BE APPROVED BEFORE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS WILL BE ALLOWED PER SECTION 3318 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE. DRAINAGE NOTES: 21. ROOF DRAINAGE MUST BE DIVERTED FROM GRADED SLOPES. 22. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE FOR CONTRIBUTORY DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES. 23. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING WITHIN A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ARE TO BE DONE PER PRIVATE DRAIN PD NO. N/A OR MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER DRAIN MTD NO. N/A . 24. ALL STORM DRAIN WORK IS TO BE DONE UNDER CONTINUOUS INSPECTION BY THE FIELD ENGINEER. WEEKLY STATUS REPORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY THE FIELD ENGINEER TO THE LOCAL BUILDING AND SAFETY DISTRICT OFFICE. AGENCY NOTES: 25. AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FROM CITY OF MALIBU DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITHIN OR AFFECTING ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. ALL WORK WITHIN ROAD RIGHT OF WAY SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. 26. AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT /CONNECTION PERMIT IS REQUIRED FROM THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RIGHT OF WAY. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH CONDITIONS SET BY THE PERMIT. 27. PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OR THE LOCAL FIRE STATION PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 28. ALL WORK WITHIN THE STREAMBED AND AREAS OUTLINED ON GRADING PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO: · ARMY CORP 404 PERMIT NUMBER: N/A · CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME PERMIT NO.: N/A GENERAL GEOTECHNICAL NOTES: 29. ALL WORK MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT'S REPORT(S) AND THE APPROVED GRADING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 30. GRADING OPERATIONS MUST BE CONDUCTED UNDER PERIODIC INSPECTIONS BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS WITH MONTHLY INSPECTION REPORTS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE GEOLOGY AND SOILS SECTION. 31. THE SOIL ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INSPECTIONS DURING THE PREPARATION OF THE NATURAL GROUND AND THE PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF THE FILL TO BE SATISFIED THAT THE WORK IS BEING PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAN AND APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. 32. ROUGH GRADING MUST BE APPROVED BY A FINAL ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND SOILS ENGINEERING REPORT. AN AS-BUILT GEOLOGIC MAP MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL GEOLOGY REPORT. PROVIDE A FINAL REPORT STATEMENT THAT VERIFIES WORK WAS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND CODE PROVISIONS (SECTION 3318.1 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE). THE FINAL REPORT(S) MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 33. FOUNDATION, WALL AND POOL EXCAVATIONS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CONSULTING GEOLOGIST AND SOIL ENGINEER, PRIOR TO THE PLACING OF STEEL OR CONCRETE. 34. BUILDING PADS LOCATED IN CUT/FILL TRANSITION AREAS SHALL BE OVER-EXCAVATED A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) FEET BELOW THE PROPOSED BOTTOM OF FOOTING. FILL NOTES: 35. ALL FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM RELATIVE COMPACTION CRITERIA: a. 90 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY WITHIN 40 FEET BELOW FINISH GRADE. b. 93 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY DEEPER THAN 40 FEET BELOW FINISH GRADE, UNLESS A LOWER RELATIVE COMPACTION (NOT LESS THAN 90 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY) IS JUSTIFIED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE RELATIVE COMPACTION SHALL BE DETERMINED BY A.S.T.M. SOIL COMPACTION TEST D1557-91 WHERE APPLICABLE: WHERE NOT APPLICABLE, A TEST ACCEPTABLE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE USED. (SECTION 3313.4 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE.) 36. FIELD DENSITY SHALL BE DETERMINED BY A METHOD ACCEPTABLE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. (SECTION 3313.4 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE.) HOWEVER, NOT LESS THAN 10% OF THE REQUIRED DENSITY TEST, UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED, AND SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE SAND CONE METHOD. 37. SUFFICIENT TESTS OF THE FILL SOILS SHALL BE MADE TO DETERMINE THE RELATIVE COMPACTION OF THE FILL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM GUIDELINES: a. ONE TEST FOR EACH TWO-FOOT VERTICAL LIFT. b. ONE TEST FOR EACH 1,000 CUBIC YARDS OF MATERIAL PLACED. c. ONE TEST AT THE LOCATION OF THE FINAL FILL SLOPE FOR EACH BUILDING SITE (LOT) IN EACH FOUR-FOOT VERTICAL LIFT OR PORTION THEREOF. d. ONE TEST IN THE VICINITY OF EACH BUILDING PAD FOR EACH FOUR-FOOT VERTICAL LIFT OR PORTION THEREOF. 38. SUFFICIENT TESTS OF FILL SOILS SHALL BE MADE TO VERIFY THAT THE SOIL PROPERTIES COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, AS DETERMINED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER INCLUDING SOIL TYPES, SHEAR STRENGTHS PARAMETERS AND CORRESPONDING UNIT WEIGHTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES: a. PRIOR AND SUBSEQUENT TO PLACEMENT OF THE FILL, SHEAR TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN ON EACH TYPE OF SOIL OR SOIL MIXTURE TO BE USED FOR ALL FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN THREE (3) HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL. b. SHEAR TEST RESULTS FOR THE PROPOSED FILL MATERIAL MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE DESIGN VALUES USED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TO DETERMINE SLOPE STABILITY REQUIREMENTS. OTHERWISE, THE SLOPE MUST BE REEVALUATED USING THE ACTUAL SHEAR TEST VALUE OF THE FILL MATERIAL THAT IS IN PLACE. c. FILL SOILS SHALL BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS. 39. FILL SHALL NOT BE PLACED UNTIL STRIPPING OF VEGETATION, REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE SOILS, AND INSTALLATION OF SUBDRAIN (IF ANY) HAVE BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE A "STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR MOISTURE, ASH, ORGANIC MATTER, PEAT OR OTHER ORGANIC SOILS ASTM D-2974-87 ON ANY SUSPECT MATERIAL. DETRIMENTAL AMOUNTS OF ORGANIC MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN FILLS. SOIL CONTAINING SMALL AMOUNTS OF ROOTS MAY BE ALLOWED PROVIDED THAT THE ROOTS ARE IN A QUANTITY AND DISTRIBUTED IN A MANNER THAT WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE FUTURE USE OF THE SITE AND THE SOILS ENGINEER APPROVES THE USE OF SUCH MATERIAL. 40. ROCK OR SIMILAR MATERIAL GREATER THAN 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN THE FILL UNLESS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUCH PLACEMENT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER AND APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. LOCATION, EXTENT, AND ELEVATION OF ROCK DISPOSAL AREAS MUST BE SHOWN ON AN "AS BUILT" GRADING PLAN. 41. CONTINUOUS INSPECTION BY THE SOIL ENGINEER, OR A RESPONSIBLE REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING ALL FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OPERATIONS WHERE FILLS HAVE A DEPTH GREATER THAN 30 FEET OR SLOPE SURFACE STEEPER THAN 2:1. (SECTION 3313.7 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE) 42. CONTINUOUS INSPECTION BY THE SOIL ENGINEER, OR A RESPONSIBLE REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING ALL SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION. (SECTION 3313.2 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE) 43. ALL SUBDRAIN OUTLETS ARE TO BE SURVEYED FOR LINE AND ELEVATION. SUBDRAIN INFORMATION MUST BE SHOWN ON AN "AS BUILT" GRADING PLAN. 44.FILL SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 2:1 STEEPNESS RATIO ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE PLACEMENT OF SOIL AT SUFFICIENT DISTANCE BEYOND THE PROPOSED FINISH SLOPE TO ALLOW COMPACTION EQUIPMENT TO BE OPERATED AT THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE FINAL SLOPE SURFACE. THE EXCESS FILL IS TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. OTHER CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES MAY BE USED WHEN IT IS DEMONSTRATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL THAT THE ANGLE OF SLOPE, CONSTRUCTION METHOD AND OTHER FACTORS WILL HAVE EQUIVALENT EFFECT.(SECTION 3313.4 OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BUILDING CODE.) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (SSPWC) "GREEN BOOK." 2. CONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL REGULATIONS (CAL-OSHA) SAFETY STANDARDS. IF REQUESTED BY THE INSPECTOR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROOF OF A PERMIT FROM SAID DIVISION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR AT (310) 456-2489, EXT. 235 FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OR GRADING OPERATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY CONSTRUCTION AND 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF SPECIFIC INSPECTION NEEDS DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. 4. STORAGE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION TRAILER, AND/OR PARKING AND ANY WORK WITHIN THE CITY PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL REQUIRE A CITY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. CALL THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR AT (310) 456-2489, EXT. 235 TO APPLY FOR A PERMIT. 5. STORAGE OF ANY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION TRAILER, AND/OR PARKING AND ANY WORK WITHIN THE CALTRANS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL REQUIRE A CALTRANS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. SUBMIT A COPY OF THE CALTRANS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 6. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING CITY WORKING HOURS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE PLANS. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AND SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE, PROTECT, AND SAVE ANY AND ALL SURVEY MONUMENTS THAT WILL BE OR MAY BE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED BY THEIR OPERATIONS. ONCE FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THEN NOTIFY BOTH THE DEVELOPER'S SUPERVISING CIVIL ENGINEER AND THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR. THE SUPERVISING CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL RESET ALL SAID MONUMENTS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR'S ACT. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTY INSOFAR AS IT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THESE OPERATIONS. 10. EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNS ARE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PRIOR NOTIFICATION AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. AS A MINIMUM, CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE TRAFFIC SIGNS AND STRIPING SHALL BE FURNISHED, INSTALLED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK" (THE "WATCH MANUAL"), PUBLISHED BY BNI BUILDING NEWS, INC. A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, PREPARED BY THE DEVELOPER, MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 11. DUST CONTROL SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. 12. EROSION CONTROL PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PROJECTS. GRADING AND CLEARING IS PROHIBITED FROM NOVEMBER 1 TO MARCH 31 FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO ESHA AND/OR INCLUDING GRADING ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 4:1. 13. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SERVICE LATERALS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, AND PAVING UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 14. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH NPDES REQUIREMENTS. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES AND SHALL BE KEPT UPDATED. 15. ALL RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE GEOTECHNICAL/SOILS ENGINEER (AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST, WHERE EMPLOYED), AND CONTAINED IN THE REPORTS REFERENCED HEREON, AS APPROVED OR CONDITIONED BY THE CITY, SHALL BE CONSIDERED A PART OF THE GRADING PLAN. 16. ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP). 17. TERRACE DRAINS, INTERCEPTOR DRAINS, AND DOWN DRAINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 3" P.C.C. REINFORCED WITH 6"X6" X #10 W.W.M. AND SHALL BE EITHER SEMICIRCULAR OR TRIANGULAR CROSS SECTION. CONCRETE COLOR SHALL BE "OMAHA TAN" OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 18. GRADING QUANTITIES: CUT 1,543 CU.YD. FILL 188 CU.YD. EXPORT 1,355 CU.YD. IMPORT 0 CU.YD. 19. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: 10,231 S.F. = 0.23 ACRES (INCLUDING GRADING, CLEARING, AND LANDSCAPING AREA) TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 0 SQ. FT. TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 6,400 SQ. FT. FLOOD ZONE ON FIRM: D BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: N/A FT., PANEL: 06037C1518F 20. ALL SLOPES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ADJOINING STREETS, DRAINAGE CHANNELS, OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES SHALL BE GRADED NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1 FOR CUT AND FILL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER ON RECOMMENDATION OF THE PROJECT'S GEOTECHNICAL/SOILS CONSULTANT. 21. ALL CATCH BASINS AND DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE STENCILED WITH THE CITY OF MALIBU STORM DRAIN LOGO. NOTES TO CONTRACTOR: A. SEPARATE BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL RETAINING WALLS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. B. VERIFY ALL EXISTING ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO ANY HARD SURFACE CONSTRUCTION, AND ADVISE PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER IF ANY OUT OF LIMIT CONDITION ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION SURVEY . SITE ADDRESS: 29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD, MALIBU, CA 90265 APN: 4468-011-010 & 4468-011-011 OWNER: ARCHITECT: DAVID KALEN, AIA 2701 AIRPORT AVE., SUITE 202 SANTA MONICA, CA 90405 CIVIL ENGINEER: PLANEX ASSOCIATES, INC. 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 EXISTING BUILDING:0 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING: 4,570 S.F. THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVED BY THE CITY FOR SUBJECT PROJECT IN THE CITY OF MALIBU, CALIFORNIA ON _____________________ PROJECT START: N/A PROJECT COMPLETION: N/A APPROVAL BY CONSULTANTS: THIS PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND CONFORMS TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF GEOLOGIC AND SOILS REPORTS DATED: PREPARED BY: P.E. BY: ENGINEER GEOLOGIST VICINITY MAP PROJECT PROJECT INFORMATION: LEGEND: DATE: SIGNED REGI E
D PROF
E
S I MO
S
A
HEBI NO. 33508 CIVIL
S RE
T
ONAL ENGINEER
CALIFORN
S
IA
TAT E
OF3/21/2024 SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 TEL. (310) 664-9311 Associates 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. C - These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Planex Associates. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specific project and shall not be used otherwise without written permission of Planex Associates c DATE:
BY NO. DATE REVISION PFN: 1909-495 SHEET OF
29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD. , MALIBU, CA 90265 3/21/2024
GRADING PLAN 1 1
270
APN 4468-011-011
APN 4468-011-010
3' RET.
191.00 F.F.
180.00 F.F. 189.80 T.G. 193.50 TW C F
178.50 FS 194.50 TW 199.50 TW 9% 10.3% 8.4% 2.1% 3.1% 200.55 TW 6' RET. 194.00 TW 4' RET. EX. 10' GATE EX. 10' GATE 16.4% 7.6% 15.5' 15' C ±5 RET. 0' RET. 14' 195.00 TW 199.50 TW F C 178.50 TW 0' RET. 192.50 TW 2.5' RET. 4.5' RET. A/C-3 A/C-3 194.00 TW 5.5' RET. 199.35 TP 5' RET. 194.00 TW 3' RET. 200.00 TP 200.50 TW 5' RET.
DRAIN PIPE
179.80 FS 178.50 TW 1' RET. 185.50 TW 5' RET. 6' RET.
190.00 F.F.
106' TO FIRE HYDRANT 15.5' F.H. B.V.C. E.V.C.20% 2% 0.4% 2% 2% 1' RET. 190.00 F.F. 191.50 FS 193.00 FS F C
180.50 185 180
190 175 4' RET. 4%
2' RET. 189.50 FS194.00 TW 0.5' RET. 189.50 TW 3.0' RET. 185 180 180.00 FS
1.5' RET. 179.80 FS 190.00 TW 6' RET. 4.5' RET. 2.5% 186.00 180.00 FS180.50 TW 189.90 0' RET. 179.33 179.80 FS 6' RET. DRAIN PIPE 200.15 TP 2% 199.00 TW 5' RET. B.V.C. E.V.C. R=50' R=65' F 5' RET. 202 204 206 210 212 214 216 218 219 208
201200 190 192 194 198 196 ROCK RIP-RAP OUTLET OVERFLOW PIPE PERMAVOID EVAPO-TRANSPIRATION PLANTER 4' RET. 1' RET. PARCEL 3, APPURTENANT INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT PARCEL 3, APPURTENANT INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT PARCEL 4, APPURTENANT INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 TEL. (310) 664-9311 Associates 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. C - These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Planex Associates. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specific project and shall not be used otherwise without written permission of Planex Associates c DATE:
BY NO. DATE REVISION PFN: 1909-495 SHEET OF
29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD. , MALIBU, CA 90265 10/30/2023
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 2 2 SCALE: 1" = 20' DATE: SIGNEDREGI E D PROFES I MO SAHEBI NO. 33508 CIVIL S RE T ONAL ENGINEER CALIFORN S IA TAT E OF10/30/2023 NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: A. THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT SHOULD DETERMINE THE EXPANSION POTENTIAL OF THE FINISH GRADE MATERIALS AT THE COMPLETION OF GRADING. FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD BE REVISED IF THE EXPANSION POTENTIAL OF FINISH GRADE MATERIALS SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERS FROM THE ASSUMED EXPANSION RANGE. B. AT THE COMPLETION OF GRADING, SAMPLES OF THE ONSITE SOILS SHOULD BE COLLECTED AND TESTED FOR CORROSION POTENTIAL. FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDING CEMENT TYPE SHOULD BE BASED ON THE CORROSION POTENTIAL OF THE FINISH GRADE MATERIALS. C. THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT SHOULD DETERMINE AT THE COMPLETION OF GRADING THE R-VALUE OF THE FINISH GRADE MATERIALS WITHIN PARKING AND ACCESS ROAD AREAS. FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN SHOULD BE BASED ON THE ACTUAL R-VALUE OF THE FINISH GRADE MATERIALS. D. SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE TESTED FOR EXPANSION INDEX PRIOR TO POURING FOOTINGS OR SLABS; FOUNDATION PLANS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND REVISED BY THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT, AS APPROPRIATE. OF 1 1 10-30-2023
PROPOSED FUTURE SEEPAGE PIT:
4' DIAMETER
40' DEEP
10' CAP
PROPOSED FUTURE SEEPAGE PIT: 4'
DIAMETER
50' DEEP
19' CAP
PROPOSED 2,500 GAL
SEPTIC TANK
03-21-2024
271
190 200 210 180 170 160 190 200 210 180 170 160 190.00 FF DRWY. SECTION A-A SCALE: 1" = 10' PROP. BLDG. WALL CUT CUT EX. BLDG. P.L. 191.00 FS 180.00 F.F. CUT 178.50 FS EVAPO-TRANSPIRATION PERMAVOID PLANTER SITE DRAIN OVERFLOW PIPE 175.00 INV. EX. GRADE ROCK RIP-RAP 200 210 195 205 215 220 225 190 200 210 195 205 215 220 225 190 50.00' 10.00' 59.40' 26.00' 11.76' (220.11 ) TP (219.70 ) EP JOIN HEATHERCLIFF RD. C/L 24.87' 15.40' (219.90 ) 201.11 TP 202.01 TP 200.11 TP (219.54 ) (217.05) 7.24' 216.80 TP 8.4% 49.00' 211.75 TP 218.99 TP 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROFILE SCALE: 1" = 10' 16.4% 2% 9% 10.3% 7.6% PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE 2.1% CUT FILL 3.1% 220 210 200 190 220 210 200 190 8.4% SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 TEL. (310) 664-9311 Associates 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. C - These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Planex Associates. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specific project and shall not be used otherwise without written permission of Planex Associates c DATE:
BY NO. DATE REVISION PFN: 1909-495 SHEET OF
29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD. , MALIBU, CA 90265 7/14/2023
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE PLAN 3 3 DATE: SIGNEDREGI E D PROFES I MO SAHEBI NO. 33508 CIVIL S RE T ONAL ENGINEER CALIFORN S IA TAT E OF7/14/2023 272
APN 4468-011-011
APN 4468-011-010
10' 15'
F.D. URNAROUND
15'
20'
50' P.L. P.L. P.L. P.L.
5'
5'
9%
10.3%
8.4%
2.1%
3.1%
16.4%
7.6%
15.5'
15'
20'
14'
15'
106' TO FIRE HYDRANT
15.5'
F.H.
B.V.C.
E.V.C.
20%
2%
0.4%
2%
2%
G.B.
G.B.
G.B.
G.B.
G.B.
G.B.
G.B.
G.B.
20' VERT. CURVE
20'
VERT. CURVE
185
175
180
4%
185
180
5' FD PATH
FD PATH
0% 2.5% 5% MAX. 5% MAX.
0%
2% B.V.C. E.V.C. R=50'
R=65'
10' 20' ADDRESS: APN: LCP ZONING DESIGNATION: GROSS LOT AREA= LOT DEPTH:= LOT WIDTH= PROPOSED FRONT YARD SETBACK= PROPOSED REAR YARD SETBACK= PROPOSED SIDE YARD SETBACK= CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VHFHSZ : OCCUPANCY: FIRE SPRINKLERS: FIRE FLOW BASED ON THE FIRE-FLOW CALCULATION AREA: REDUCTION FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS (MAXIMUM 50%): TOTAL FIRE FLOW REQUIRED : EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE: PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE: GARAGE= FIRST FLOOR= SECOND FLOOR= OVERHANG ( > 6' ) TOTAL= 29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD, MALIBU, CA 90265 4468-011-010 & 4468-011-011 A1-1 33532 SQ. FT. (0.77 ACRES) 1289' 115' 25.6' FROM PROPERTY LINE 164' 17.4' (E), & 11.7' (W) V-B YES SINGLE FAMILY YES 1750 GPM 500 GPM 1250 GPM 0 S.F. 390 SQ. FT. 2,590 SQ. FT. 1,460 SQ. FT. 320 SQ. FT. 4,570 SQ. FT. PROJECT DATA 50.00' 10.00' 59.40' 26.00' 11.76' (220.11 ) TP (219.70 ) EP JOIN HEATHERCLIFF RD. C/L 24.87' 15.40' (219.90 ) 201.11 TP 202.01 TP 200.11 TP (219.54 ) (217.05) 7.24' 216.80 TP 49.00' 211.75 TP 218.99 TP DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROFILE
16.4% 2%
9%
10.3%
7.6%
3.1% 2.1% 220 210 200 190 220 210 200 190
8.4% VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE ADDRESS: 29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD, MALIBU, CA 90265 APN: 4468-011-010 & 4468-011-011 OWNER: ARCHITECT: DAVID KALEN, AIA 2701 AIRPORT AVE., SUITE 202 SANTA MONICA, CA 90405 CIVIL ENGINEER: PLANEX ASSOCIATES, INC. 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 EXISTING BUILDING:0 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING: 4,570 S.F. THIS PLAN CONFORMS TO THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVED BY THE CITY FOR SUBJECT PROJECT IN THE CITY OF MALIBU, CALIFORNIA ON _____________________ PROJECT START: N/A PROJECT COMPLETION: N/A PROJECT INFORMATION: ACCESS DRIVEWAY TYPICAL SECTION SCALE: 1" = 4' 15' MIN. OF 4" CRUSHED AGG. BASE @ 95% COMPACTION (CALTRANS CLASS II) MIN. 3" TYPE II, A.C. PVMT. NOTE: FINAL DRIVEWAY SECTION DESIGN FOR APPARATUS WEIGHING 25 TONS TO BE DETERMINED AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECT'S SOILS ENGINEER PER FIELD TEST. 90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE ER LABORATORY COMPACTION STANDARD ASTM D-1557. EX. FENCE EX. FENCE 1.5% 1.5% 14. WALKING ACCESS USED TO CONNECT VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL BE LEVEL, UNOBSTRUCTED BY LANDSCAPING, MINIMUM 5'-0" IN WIDTH, CLEAR TO THE SKY, ACCESSIBLE FOR FIREFIGHTING AND RESCUE PURPOSES. INDICATE ACCESS ON SITE PLAN. 15. ALL NEW SWIMMING POOLS, 5000 GALLONS OR MORE IN CAPACITY, LOCATED IN FIRE ZONE 4 OR VERY HIGH FIRE SEVERITY ZONE MAY REQUIRE AN AUXILIARY OUTLET. CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. 16. COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, 310.4 REGARDING ACCESS. 17. FIRE RESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES FOR PROTECTION OF OPENINGS TO COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, 713. 18. WALLS AND SOFFITS OF ENCLOSED USABLE SPACE UNDER INTERIOR STAIRWAYS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE ENCLOSED BY BUILDING CODE 1006.12 SHALL BE PROTECTED ON THE ENCLOSED SIDE AS REQUIRED FOR ONE-HOUR RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION. TITLE 24, 1003.3.3.9. 19. ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED, TESTED AND ACCEPTED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. FIRE CODE 501.4. 20. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL MEASURE 6"X4"X2-1/2", BRASS OR BRONZE, CONFORMING TO AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARD C503, OR APPROVED EQUAL, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT REGULATION 8. 21. PLANS SHOWING UNDERGROUND PIPING FOR PRIVATE ON-SITE FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK UNIT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. FIRE CODE 901.2, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT REGULATION 7 22. PROVIDE AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AS SET FORTH BY BUILDING CODE 903 AND FIRE CODE 903. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK UNIT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. REASON: RESIDENTIAL CODE & FIRE CODE 903.1 & FIRE FLOW REDUCTION TYPE OF FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2, 903.3.1.3 23. THE SECURITY GATE SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM ACCESS WIDTH OF 20 FEET. THE SECURITY GATE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN APPROVED MEANS OF EMERGENCY OPERATION, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED OPERATIONAL AT ALL TIMES AND REPLACED OR REPAIRED WHEN DEFECTIVE. ELECTRIC GATE OPERATORS, WHERE PROVIDED, SHALL BE LISTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL 325. GATES INTENDED FOR AUTOMATIC OPERATION SHALL BE DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED AND INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F220. GATES SHALL BE OF THE SWINGING OR SLIDING TYPE. CONSTRUCTION OF GATES SHALL BE OF MATERIALS THAT ALLOW MANUAL OPERATION BY ONE PERSON. FIRE CODE 503.6. THE SECURITY MANUAL GATE OPERATOR SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EMERGENCY OPERATION, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED OPERATIONAL AT ALL TIMES. FIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENTS 1. PROVIDE AND INDICATE ON SITE PLAN, FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS OR VEHICULAR TURN-AROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS BELOW OR PROVIDE A MINIMUM, UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF 20 FEET CLEAR TO SKY, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO WITHIN 150 FEET OF ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS. FIRE CODE 503.1.1 & 503.2.1. 2. FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESS ROADS MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN A SERVICEABLE MANNER PRIOR TO AND DURING THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. FIRE CODE 901.3. 3. THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE HYDRANTS AT THIS LOCATION IS 1,250 GALLONS PER MINUTE, AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE, FOR A DURATION OF 2 HOURS, OVER AND ABOVE THE MAXIMUM DAILY DOMESTIC DEMAND. FIRE CODE 507.3 AND APPENDIX B105.1 APPENDIX B. FIRE FLOW MAY BE OBTAINED FROM PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANT FLOWING SIMULTANEOUSLY. 4. COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, 310.9.1 REGARDING FIRE WARNING SYSTEMS. SMOKE DETECTORS TO BE HAND WIRED WITH BATTERY BACKUP. WHEN MORE THAN ONE SMOKE ALARM IS INSTALLED, `THEY SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT THE OPERATION OF ANY SMOKE ALARM CAUSES THE ALARM IN ALL SMOKE ALARMS WITHIN THE DWELLING UNIT TO SOUND (CALIFORNIA ALARM CODE). PROVIDE NOTE ON SITE PLAN AND INDICATE ON FLOOR PLAN. 5. PROVIDE ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE OCCUPANCY SEPARATION BETWEEN THE R-3 DWELLING AND THE GARAGE. (INDICATE ON FLOOR PLAN.) 6. EXIT DOORS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF OPENING WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. BUILDING CODE 1003.3.1.8. 7. WIDTH AND HEIGHT OF REQUIRED EXIT DOORWAYS SHALL COMPLY WITH TITLE 24. (INDICATE ON DOOR SCHEDULE). 8. BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS TO BE PROVIDED ON FRONT OF ALL BUILDINGS AND SHALL BE VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND. FIRE CODE 901.4.4. 9. PROVIDE A KEY BOX AS REQUIRED BY FIRE CODE 904.2 LOCATION AT GATE. 10. PROVIDE APPROVED SIGNS OR OTHER APPROVED NOTICES OR MARKINGS THAT INCLUDE THE WORDS NO PARKING-FIRE LANE. SIGNS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 12 INCHES WIDE BY 18 INCHES HIGH AND HAVE RED LETTERS ON A WHITE REFLECTIVE BACKGROUND. SIGNS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS, TO CLEARLY INDICATE THE ENTRANCE TO SUCH ROAD, OR PROHIBIT THE OBSTRUCTION THEREOF AND AT INTERVALS, AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE INSPECTOR. FIRE CODE 503.3 11. PRIVATE ROADS USED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING THE WEIGHT OF A 25-TON VEHICLE. 12. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS LESS THAN 10% SLOPE, AND NOT PAVED TO PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS, REQUIRE CERTIFICATION FROM A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER STATING THE ROAD MEETS OR EXCEEDS ALL-WEATHER STANDARDS OF LA CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 13. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS 10% OR GREATER SLOPE SHALL BE PAVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 24.00' 24.00' 26.00' DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE PROFILE (LOWER PORTION) SCALE: 1" = 10' 20' VERTICAL CURVE 20' VERTICAL CURVE 200 180 190 199.48 TP
200.00 TP 2%
189.80 TP
199.28 PI-VC
190.48
B.V.C.
E.V.C.
E.V.C.
B.V.C.
197.28 TP
192.48 TP
190.28 TP2%
20% 200 180 190
PI-VC
PI-VC SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 TEL. (310) 664-9311 Associates 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD. C - These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Planex Associates. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specific project and shall not be used otherwise without written permission of Planex Associates c DATE:
BY NO. DATE REVISION PFN: 1909-495 SHEET OF
29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD. , MALIBU, CA 90265 12/3/2021
FIRE ACCESS EXHIBIT
1 FD SCALE: 1" = 20' DATE: SIGNED
REGI E
D PROF
E
S I MO
S
A
HEBI NO. 33508 CIVIL
S RE
T
ONAL ENGINEER
CALIFORN
S
IA
TAT E
OF12/3/2021
273
Client:
Project location:
David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:
Date:
L A N D S C A P E
COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC
A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O
NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
08/15/2023
TITLE SHEET
L-0.1
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD
MALIBU CA 90265-4421
ASSESSOR'S ID No. 4468-011-011
LANDSCAPE WATER EFFICIENCY PLAN
PROJECT INFORMATION:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
GROSS LOT AREA: 33,532 SF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTING ZONE: 4
SUNSET CLIMATE ZONE: 23
PROJECT AREA
NOTES:
1. TREE CANOPIES ARE SHOWN IN FULL MATURITY.
2. MATURE TREES TO REMAIN ON SITE PROTECTED IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
3. THE TYPE OF SOIL IS SUITABLE FOR ALL THE PROPOSED PLANTS IN THIS LANDSCAPE.
4. THERE IS NO WATER FEATURE IN THIS PROJECT.
5. WATER PURVEYOR NAME:
WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
17140 SOUTH AVALON BLVD. SUITE 210
CARSON, CA 90746-1296
(310) 217-2411
6. STREET TREES WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE TO BE PLANTED PER APPROVED STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS.
7. ALL HARDSCAPE, RETAINING WALLS, SWIMMING POOLS, AND/OR BLOCK WALLS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
8. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY: ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE
CONTINUOUSLY PRIVATELY MAINTAINED
BY PROPERTY OWNER ON SITE & OFF
SITE.
NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY
RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE.
________________________ __________
PROPERTY OWNER DATE
SHEET INDEX:
L0.1 COVER SHEET
L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN
L1.1 LANDSCAPE NOTES + DETAILS
L1.2 FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN
L2.0 IRRIGATION PLAN
L2.1 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE & MWELO
L2.2 IRRIGATION DETAILS
GREEN BUILDING COMPLIANCE
I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE. __________ ______________________ ________________ PAUL LEWIS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE
AREA SUMMARY
TOTAL LOT AREA = APPROX. 33,532 SF
LANDSCAPE AREA OF PROJECT = 5,662 SF
FUEL MODIFICATION
FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN IS REQUIRED PER:
OFFICE: CALABASAS
PHONE NO. (818) 880-0341
OFFICE ADDRESS: 26600 AGOURA RD. SUITE 110
CALABASAS, CA 91302
FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN: #
FFFM:
VICINITY MAP
NTS
PROJECT AREA
LA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP
NTS
2023-08-15 Heathercliff CD Set 2023-08-15 Heathercliff CD Set 274
DRIVEWAY
DECK AT
SECOND FLOOR
EL 190.00'
EL 190'
EL 191.5'
NEW
SINGLE
FAMILY
DWELLING
UPPER LEVEL FF EL 190'
LOWER LEVEL FF EL 180'
PATIO
EL 180.00'
PATIO
EL 178.50
ROOF
EL 201.00'
ROOF
EL 201.00'
ROOF
EL 206.00'
ROOF
EL 199.00'
PARKING
SPACE
PARKING
SPACE
PLANTING LEGEND
SymbolBotanical Name/Common Name Quantity Size
TREES
SHRUBS
Agave vilmoriniana / Octopus agave 6 5g L Alt. 15g
spacing per plan
Calamagrostis acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' / 44 5g M
Feather reed grass, @ 30" o.c.
Juncus patens / California gray rush 93 1g L
@ 18" o.c.
Romneya coulteri / Matilija poppy 24 5g VL
@ 48" o.c.
Salvia leucantha / Mexican sage 10 5g L
@ 30" o.c.
GROUND COVER
Arctostaphylos 'Emerald Carpet'/ Manzanita 19 1g L
field spaced
Bouteloua gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' 140 1g L
317 sf @ 18" o.c.
Carex divulsa / Berkeley sedge 15 flat L
720 sf @ 12" o.c. = 720 plants
Ceanothus griseus horizontalis 'Yankee Point' / 20 1g L Yankee Point, field spaced
Trachelospermum jasminoides / Star jasmine 4 flat M
160 sf @ 12" o.c. = 160 plants
Remarks
Geijera parviflora / Australian willow
WUCOLS
1 36" Box L
HYDROSEED MIX
Botanical Name/Common Name
(Lbs/Ac)
Lotus scoparius (Acmispon glaber) / Deerweed x
Eschscholzia californica / California poppy x
Mimulus (aurauntiacus) longiflorus / Sticky x
Monkeyflower
Lupinus perennis / Perennial Lupine x
Salvia apiana / White sage x
Asclepias fascicularis / Narrow-leaved milkweed x
Eriophyllum confertiflorum / Golden yarrow x
Pseudognaphalium californicum / California x
everlasting
Koeleria macrantha / June grass x
Gilia capitata / Globe gilia x
TOTAL SEED RATE: x
3,017 sf
Stover Seed Co.
PO Box 1579
9180 San Fernando Rd.
Sun Valley, CA
213-626-9668
Contact: Stephen Knutson
Seed Rate Remarks
Client:
Project location:
David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:
Date:
L A N D S C A P E
COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC
A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O
NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
1/8" = 1'-0"
LANDSCAPE PLAN
L-1.0
0'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
4' 8' 16'
EXISTING NATURAL TO REMAIN
PAVING
POOL ABOVE
LARGE BOULDER
PERMAVOID PLANTER
PER CIVIL ENG.
08/15/2023
PROPOSED FUTURE
SEEPAGE PIT
PROPOSED
SEEPAGE PIT
PROPOSED 2,500
GAL. SEPTIC TANK
275
Client:
Project location:
David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:
Date:
L A N D S C A P E
COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC
A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O
NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
1/8" = 1'-0"
NOTES & DETAILS
L-1.1
GENERAL PLANTING NOTES
9. FOR BIDDING AREA TO BE LANDSCAPED, THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS SHALL BE USED UNTIL CONTRACTOR IS PROVIDED WITH SOILS AGRONOMY REPORT.
AMENDMENTS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY BROADCAST AND THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED BY MEANS OF A ROTOTILLER OR EQUAL.
AMOUNT PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET
4 CU. YDS. NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT
DERIVED FROM REDWOOD SAWDUST,
FIR SAWDUST OR CEDAR SAWDUST.
15 LBS. SOIL SULFUR
15 LBS. 12-12-12 FERTILIZER
10. A MINIMUM 3" (THREE INCHES) LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK MULCH SHALL BE
APPLIED ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL SURFACES OF PLANTING AREAS EXCEPT TURF
AREAS, CREEPING OR ROOTING GROUNDCOVERS, OR DIRECT SEEDING APPLICATIONS WHERE MULCH IS CONTRAINDICATED. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT 1/2 CU.
FT BAG AS SAMPLE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
11. THE PLANTING PITS FOR BOXED TREES SHALL BE EXCAVATED TWICE THE
DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL WITH A MAXIMUM OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROOTBALL TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PLANTING PIT.
DO NOT OVER EXCAVATE!!!
THE BACKFILL MIX FOR USE AROUND THE ROOTBALL OF ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING FORMULA:
6 PARTS ON-SITE SOIL
4 PARTS BY VOLUME ORGANIC AMENDMENT PER ABOVE SOIL
PREPARATION
1 LB./CU.YD. OF MIX 12-12-12 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER
2 LBS./CU. YD. OF MIX IRON SULFATE
10 LBS./CU. YD. OF MIX AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM
12. THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER INSTALLATION ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE FERTILIZED WITH BEST FERTILIZER COMPANY 16-6-8 OR APPROVED EQUAL, APPLIED AT THE RATE OF SIX POUNDS (6 LBS.) PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR PER SOIL AGRONOMY REPORT.
FERTILIZER APPLICATION SHALL BE CONTINUED THEREAFTER AT MONTHLY INTERVALS.
13. FOR ALL TREES, SEE DETAIL 1, THIS SHEET
14. FOR ALL SHRUBS, SEE DETAIL 2 & 3, THIS SHEET.
15. FERTILIZER TABLETS SHALL BE AGRIFORM, 21 GRAM TABLETS (20-10-5) IN QUANTITIES AS FOLLOWS:
1 GALLON SHRUBS 1
5 GALLON SHRUBS 3
15 GALLON SHRUBS 5
BOXED TREES 1 PER 4" OF BOX SIZE
PLACE TABLETS AT HALF THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL.
16. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS DISTURBED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION
PROCESS WILL BE RECONDITIONED TO THEIR ORIGINAL STATE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
17. INSTALL 24" DEEP ROOT BARRIER ON ALL TREES WITHIN 4 FEET OF PAVING.
18. FOR SOILS LESS THAN 6% ORGANIC MATTER IN THE TOP 6" (SIX INCHES) OF SOIL, COMPOST AT A RATE OF A MINIMUM OF FOUR CUBIC YARDS PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET
OF PERMEABLE AREA SHALL BE INCORPORATED TO A DEPTH OF SIX INCHES INTO THE SOIL.
19. RECIRCULATING WATER SYSTEMS SHALL BE USED FOR WATER FEATURES.
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A QUALIFIED SUPERVISOR ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION THROUGH COMPLETION OF PICK-UP WORK.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES LISTED FOR CONVENIENCE OF CONTRACTOR. ACTUAL NUMBER OF SYMBOLS SHALL HAVE PRIORITY OVER QUANTITY DESIGNATED.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND PAY FOR ALL CONTAINER GROWN TREES,
SHRUBS AND VINES, INCLUDING SEEDED AND SODDED TURF, HYDROMULCHES AND FLATTED GROUNDCOVERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE AND PAY FOR: PLANTING OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS; THE SPECIFIED GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS; THE STAKING AND GUYING OF TREES AND THE CONTINUOUS PROTECTION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS UPON THEIR ARRIVAL AT THE SITE.
4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. ALL BOXED TREES IN PAVING SHALL BE SELECTED AND SPOTTED BY THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IN CONJUNCTION WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ASSUME ALL LIABILITY FOR ACCURATE PLACEMENT OF TREES.
6. ALL VINE RUNNERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NURSERY STAKES REMOVED AND VINE RUNNERS SHALL BE ESPALIERED TO THE ADJACENT WALL OR FENCE.
7. ALL SOIL PREPARATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER THE SOIL AGRONOMY REPORT TO BE PROVIDED AND PAID FOR BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR. THE REPORT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY FORWARDED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UPON COMPLETION.
8. THE SOIL AMENDMENTS SPECIFIED ARE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A SOILS AGRONOMY REPORT FROM WALLACE SOILS LABORATORY (310) 615-0116 AND/OR ANY ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATION
PROVIDED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS.
ALL GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PLANTED AT EQUAL SPACING
12" (SHRUBS)
8" (GROUNDCOVER)
SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
(MAX.) AT
1/2 "EQUAL"
EDGE OF PLANTING AREA
NOTE:
TYPICAL PLANT, SPACING VARIESSPACING AT IRREGULAR EDGES EQUAL
SEE PLANT LEGEND AND PLANS
EQUAL
EQUAL
EQUAL
'INFILL' PLANT, AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN
BACKFILL
PLANT TABLETS PER SPECS
SCARIFY SUBGRADE
PLANTING PIT TO BE 2"
SHALLOWER THAN ROOTBALL
AT CENTER, BUT DEEPER
AROUND HOLE'S EDGES TO
PREVENT SETTLING. PIT TO
BE TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE
CONTAINER.
SET CROWN OF ROOTBALL 2"
ABOVE FINISH GRADE
3" DEEP TAMPED EARTH WATER
BASIN AROUND SHRUB, FILL WITH
MULCH
MULCH
FINISH GRADE
EDGES
LODGEPOLE PINE
APPROVED MULCH.
FINISH
MIN.
12"
RECEIVE A 4" LAYER OF
3" BASIN IN LAWN
AREA 12" FROM TRUNK
6" BASIN IN G. COVER
MAINTAIN TURF FREE
NOTE: ALL PLANT BASINS SHALL
(SEE SPECS.)
FINISH GRADE
PUDDLE AND SETTLE
TO SET PLANT AT
PLANTING TABLETS
PLANTING BACKFILL
GRADE
MIN.
12"
TREE TIE
DETAIL
TREE TIE, NAIL TO STAKE
LODGEPOLE PINE STAKE
TREE TRUNK
(SEE SPECS.)
BACKFILL MIX
10 FT FOR 36" BOX
GALVANIZED NAILS
CINCH TIE, SECURED
TO STAKE WITH
STAKES, 2 PER TREE
12 FT FOR 48" BOX 12" ROOT3"
3" DRAIN CAP 1X
CAP W/GRAVEL PER
PLANTING PLAN
PVC PIPE & SLIP
3" PERFORATED
2 PER TREE
2X ROOTBALL
DO NOT EXCAVATE DEEPER THAN SOIL IN BOX
VERIFY SOIL DEPTH IN BOX PRIOR TO EXCAVATION BALL
TOP OF
3" ABOVE
FINISH
ROOT BALL
GRADE
05/24/2023
2023-08-15 Heathercliff CD Set 2023-08-15 Heathercliff CD Set 276
PLANTING LEGEND
SymbolBotanical Name/Common Name Quantity Size
TREES
SHRUBS
Agave vilmoriniana / Octopus agave 6 5g L Alt. 15g
spacing per plan
Calamagrostis acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' / 44 5g M
Feather reed grass, @ 30" o.c.
Juncus patens / California gray rush 93 1g L
@ 18" o.c.
Romneya coulteri / Matilija poppy 24 5g VL
@ 48" o.c.
Salvia leucantha / Mexican sage 10 5g L
@ 30" o.c.
GROUND COVER
Arctostaphylos 'Emerald Carpet'/ Manzanita 19 1g L
field spaced
Bouteloua gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' 140 1g L
317 sf @ 18" o.c.
Carex divulsa / Berkeley sedge 15 flat L
720 sf @ 12" o.c. = 720 plants
Ceanothus griseus horizontalis 'Yankee Point' / 20 1g L Yankee Point, field spaced
Trachelospermum jasminoides / Star jasmine 4 flat M
160 sf @ 12" o.c. = 160 plants
Remarks
Geijera parviflora / Australian willow
WUCOLS
1 36" Box L
HYDROSEED MIX
Botanical Name/Common Name
(Lbs/Ac)
Lotus scoparius (Acmispon glaber) / Deerweed x
Eschscholzia californica / California poppy x
Mimulus (aurauntiacus) longiflorus / Sticky x
Monkeyflower
Lupinus perennis / Perennial Lupine x
Salvia apiana / White sage x
Asclepias fascicularis / Narrow-leaved milkweed x
Eriophyllum confertiflorum / Golden yarrow x
Pseudognaphalium californicum / California x
everlasting
Koeleria macrantha / June grass x
Gilia capitata / Globe gilia x
TOTAL SEED RATE: x
3,017 sf
Stover Seed Co.
PO Box 1579
9180 San Fernando Rd.
Sun Valley, CA
213-626-9668
Contact: Stephen Knutson
Seed Rate Remarks
Client:
Project location:
David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:
Date:
L A N D S C A P E
COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC
A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O
NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
1" = 16'
FUEL MODIFICATION
PLAN
L-1.2
0'
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
8' 16' 32'
ZONE A
EMBER RESISTANT ZONE
ZONE B
ZONE C
MULTI-LEVEL NEW RESIDENCE
ZONE B
08/15/2023
277
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
CST COOL SEASON TURF
WST WARM SEASON TURF
HWUS HIGH WATER USING SHRUB/TREE
MWUS MEDIUM WATER USING SHRUB/TREE
LWUS LOW WATER USING SHRUB/TREE
VLWUS VERY LOW WATER USING SHRUB/TREE
HYDROZONE LEGEND
IRRIGATION LEGEND
MFG. MODEL NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION REMARKS
APPROVED PVC SCH. 40 LATERAL LINE; SEE PLAN FOR SIZE SEE DETAIL I APPROVED PVC SCH. 40 MAINLINE SLEEVE; 2 AT EACH LOCATION 2X THE DIA. OF PIPE TO BE SLEEVED SEE NOTES 1, 2 SYMBOL
M
A
FEBCO LF825-YA, 1" REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE SEE DETAIL D
APPROVED METER
HUNTER HQ-33DLRC, 3/4" QUICK COUPLER. SEE DETAIL C
HUNTER ICZ-101-40, 1" DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE (1" ICV FILTER SENTRY GLOBE W/1" HY100 FILTER+REGULATOR) SEE DETAIL B NIBCO APPROVED BRONZE 150 PSI RATED BALL VALVE; LINE SIZE IN VALVE BOX. SEE DETAIL C RAINBIRD XFD-09-12-xxx DRIPLINE W/ COPPER SHIELD EMITTERS; EMITTERS @12" O.C. & 12" ROW SPACING. SEE DETAIL H MV HUNTER ICV-101G, 1" MASTER CONTROL VALVE SEE DETAIL A HUNTER ICV-101G, 1" REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. SEE DETAIL A
APPROVED MAINLINE: 1) UNDER CONCRETE DECK (IN GARAGE) - TYPE L COPPER FOR SIZES 1-1/2" AND SMALLER SEE DETAIL I 2) INSIDE WALLS AND BETWEEN FLOORS (DECK PENETRATIONS) - TYPE K COPPER 3) BETWEEN WATER MAIN AND BACKFLOW - TYPE K COPPER
4) DOWNSTREAM FROM BACKFLOW - SCHEDULE 40 PVC BURIED IN SOIL SIZE 1 1/2" AND
SMALLER, SIZE NOTED
VALVE / CONTROLLER SEQUENCE --
--
-- GPM
VALVE SIZE
MWUS
DRIP
HYDROZONE TYPE
IRRIGATION TYPE
xx sf AREA
NETAFIM TL050-MFV AUTOMATIC FLUSH VALVE IN VALVE BOX AT LOW POINT. SEE DETAIL G RAINBIRD AR VALVE KIT; 1" AIR/ VACUUM RELIEF VALVE IN VALVE BOX AT HIGH POINT. SEE DETAIL G FS HUNTER HFS-FCT-100, 1" PVC FLOW SENSOR SEE DETAIL E
HUNTER ECO-ID DRIP SYSTEM INDICATOR SEE DETAIL J
xx in/hr
40 psi
APPLICATION RATE
DESIGN OPERATING PRESSURE
ECO
WATER MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE; 120 VAC POWER TO THE CONTROLLER LOCATION BY OTHERS.
HUNTER HC-1200i, FIXED 12 STN. INDOOR WALL MOUNT WIFI CONTROLLER W/ HYDRAWISE WEATHER BASED SEE DETAIL F GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES:
1. ALL MAINLINE PIPING AND CONTROL WIRES UNDER PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SEPARATE SLEEVES. ALL SLEEVING SIZES SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ALL SLEEVES SHALL BE AT A DEPTH OF 18" MINIMUM BELOW SUB GRADE.
2. ALL LATERAL LINE PIPING UNDER PAVING SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO PAVING.
THE PIPING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12" BELOW SUB GRADE.
3. PIPE SIZES SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF SMALLER PIPE SIZES SHALL BE PERMITTED BUT SUBSTITUTIONS OF LARGER SIZES MAY BE APPROVED. ALL DAMAGED AND REJECTED PIPE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE TIME OF THE REJECTION.
4. THE 120 VAC ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE AT THE CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION FROM THE SOURCE TO THE CONTROLLER OR AS ALLOWED BY LOCAL CODES.
5. ALL SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE SET PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED OR DIRECTED.
6. THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL PIPING, VALVES, OR OTHER SIMILAR APPURTENANCES SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN AND GRAPHIC CLARIFICATION AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN IRRIGATED PLANTING AREAS. WHEREVER POSSIBLE INSTALL ALL VALVES AND BOXES IN SHRUB AREAS AND NOT IN TURF AREAS.
7. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL GRADE DIFFERENCES, LOCATION OF WALLS, RETAINING WALLS, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES OF THE SITE. COORDINATE
WORK WITH OTHER TRADES AND CONTRACTORS FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE ALL ITEMS DAMAGED BY WORK PERFORMED.
8. DO NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE FIELD CONDITIONS VARY FROM
THE DRAWINGS AND THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES OR DIFFERENCES IN THE AREA DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT HAVE NOT BEEN INDICATED ON THE ENGINEERING. SUCH ITEMS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY NECESSARY REVISIONS IN THE EVENT THAT THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT HEEDED.
9. FLUSH AND ADJUST ALL SPRINKLER HEADS AND VALVES FOR THEIR OPTIMUM OPERATION.
10. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON A MINIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE OF 40 PSI AND A MAXIMUM FLOW DEMAND OF 13.4 GPM. VERIFY WATER PRESSURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN
THE WATER PRESSURE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND THE PRESSURE READING IN THE FIELD TO THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
11. ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT NOT OTHERWISE DETAILED OR SPECIFIED HEREIN SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
12. REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILED INFORMATION.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IN HIS BID FOR A ONE-YEAR (1-YEAR) MAINTENANCE PERIOD.
14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL MAINLINES IN LANDSCAPE AREAS AND NOT UNDER PAVING UNLESS IT IS A NECESSARY CROSSING OF A STREET OR WALK. THE MAINLINE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE DEPTH NOTED IN THE IRRIGATION DETAILS AND AT A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF 12"-24" FROM THE EDGE OF ALL CURBS OR WALKS. ALL MAINLINE AND VALVES SHALL BE LOCATED BEHIND THE PROPERTY LINE.
15. AUTOMATIC LANDSCAPE IRRIGATORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT DOESN'T SPRAY ON THE BUILDING.
GREEN BUILDING NOTES:
1. I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS.
2. PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICES ARE REQUIRED IF WATER PRESSURE IS BELOW OR EXCEEDS THE RECOMMENDED PRESSURE OF THE SPECIFIED IRRIGATION DEVICES.
3. AFTER INSTALLATION, INSTALLER TO PERFORM PRESSURE TESTING AND VERIFY WATER COVERAGE OF ENTIRE IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
INSTALLER SHALL ADJUST OR REPLACE ANY DEVICES TO ENSURE EFFICIENT, COMPLETE AND PROPER WORKING OF THE SYSTEM.
4. CHECK VALVES OR ANTI-DRAIN VALVES ARE REQUIRED ON ALL SPRINKLER HEADS WHERE LOW POINT DRAINAGE COULD OCCUR.
5. A DIAGRAM OF THE IRRIGATION PLAN SHOWING HYDROZONES SHALL BE KEPT WITH THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER FOR SUBSEQUENT MANAGEMENT PURPOSES.
6. THE CONTROLLER IS SHIPPED WITH A COMPLETE OPERATIONS MANUAL WHICH SHALL BE GIVEN TO OWNER OR KEPT ON SITE PER OWNER'S REQUEST.
7. A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION SHALL BE FILLED OUT AND CERTIFIED BY EITHER THE DESIGNER OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, IRRIGATION PLANS OR THE LICENSED LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PROJECT.
8. AN IRRIGATION AUDIT REPORT SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION.
A-1 Drip-M
HYDROZONES
A-2 Drip-M
A-3 Drip-M
A-4 Drip-M
POOL/SPA Drip-H
A-6 Spray-L
A-7 Spray-L
A-8 Spray-L
A-5 Drip-M
A-9 Spray-L
PRESSURE @ POC
HIGH = x psi
LOW = x psi
STATIC WATER
IRRIGATION SPRAY HEAD LEGEND
SYMBOL MFG. MODEL NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION P.S.I. G.P.M. RADIUS NOZZLE REMARKS HUNTER 12" SHRUB RISER W/MPR, 90° 40 .21 14 FT MP-1000 MAROON SEE DETAIL L HUNTER 12" SHRUB RISER W/MPR, 180° 40 .42 14 FT MP-1000 MAROON SEE DETAIL L HUNTER 12" SHRUB RISER W/MPR, 360° 40 .84 14 FT MP-1000 OLIVE SEE DETAIL L DRIP
MWUS
1"
A-1
13.4 1.44 in/hr
40 psi
893 sf
M MV FS
DRIP
LWUS
1"
A-3
9.6 1.44 in/hr
40 psi
641 sf
SPRAY
LWUS
1"
A-8
3.4 40 psi
1003 sf
SPRAY
LWUS
1"
A-7
6.7 0.41 in/hr
40 psi
1338 sf
SPRAY
LWUS
1"
A-6
3.4 40 psi
676 sf
DRIP
MWUS
1"
A-2
9.0 1.44 in/hr
40 psi
600 sf
DRIP
LWUS
1"
A-4
3.7 1.44 in/hr
40 psi
244 sf
DRIP
LWUS
1"
A-5
4.0 1.44 in/hr
40 psi
267 sf
LOCATE ON SITE PER LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT & OWNER. 110V BY
OTHERS
AT LOCATION OF CONTROLLER,
PROVIDE 3/4" CONDUIT TO ROOF
FOR SOLAR SYNC IRRIGATION
CONTROL WIRE
A
PROVIDE A DEDICATED
LANDSCAPE WATER METER
AS REQUIRED BY MWELO.
INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER
SPECS MINIMUM DISTANCE AND
PIPE REQUIREMENTS
0.41 in/hr
0.41 in/hr
POOL
NEW RESIDENCE
ECO
ECO
ECO
ECO
ECO
NOTE:
FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES ONLY.
INSTALL ALL MAINLINE AND ALL VALVES
ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. NO MAINLINES
OR IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT IN PUBLIC
RIGHT OF WAY OR NEIGHBORING
PROPERTY.
Client:
Project location:
David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:
Date:
L A N D S C A P E
COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC
A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O
NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
IRRIGATION PLAN
L-2.0
1/8" = 1'-0"
0'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
4' 8' 16'
08/15/2023
278
Client:
Project location:
David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:
Date:
L A N D S C A P E
COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC
A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O
NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE +
MWELO
L-2.1
1/8" = 1'-0"
08/15/2023
2023-08-15 Heathercliff CD Set 2023-08-15 Heathercliff CD Set 279 PVC SCH. 80 SxSxT TEE.
3" PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE.
PVC SCH. 80 TxT ELL.
PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE. LENGTH AS REQ.
PVC SCH. 80 TxT ELL.
3" PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE.
BRASS TxT ELL.
10" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH
"Q.C." EMBOSSED INTO LID (2" MIN. HIGH). 1" 18"
PVC MAINLINE. 3"
QUICK COUPLER
FINISH GRADE
ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING
COVER BY AMETEK OR APPROVED EQUAL
BRANDED W/ "GATE VALVE"
PVC MALE ADAPTOR
VALVE BOX EXTENSION; LENGTH AS REQUIRED
BALL VALVE; LINE SIZE
BALL VALVE 1" 18" MIN.
PVC MAINLINE.
3/4" Ø PEA GRAVEL; 1 CUBIC FT. MIN.
BALL VALVE
ET IRRIGATION CONTROLLER
WALL
NOTE: FOR AUTOMATIC CONTROLLERS WITH INTERNAL TRANSFORMERS, PLUG 120 VOLT POWER CORD DIRECTLY INTO CONVENIENCE OUTLET.
FLOOR
POWER CORD WITH 3-PRONGED
PLUG TRANSFORMER.
CONDUIT OUTLET BODY
JUNCTION BOX. SIZE AS
REQUIRED.
CONTROL WIRING
TO ELECTRIC
CONTROL
VALVES.
P.V.C. CONDUIT - SIZE AS
NOTED.
HOLE THROUGH
WALL FOR
CONDUIT SHALL
BE PROVIDED BY
CONTRACTOR.
SEAL AND WATER
PROOF AS
REQUIRED.
120 VOLT
CONVENIENCE
OUTLET FOR ET
IRRIGATION
CONTROLLER.
SERVICE LINE FROM P.O.C.
FINISH GRADE
PVC MAINLINE TO SYSTEMS
BRASS ELLS
PVC MALE ADAPTORS (2)
6" MIN. THICK CONCRETE PAD;
SLOPE MIN. 1/4" PER FOOT
BRASS UNION
BRASS NIPPLES TYPICAL; LENGTH
AS REQUIRED
WILKINS # YB " WYE " STRAINER
W/20 MESH SCREEN; LINE SIZE
BACKFLOW DEVICE PER PLANS;
INSTALL PER LOCAL CODE
ALL-SPEC BACKFLOW
ENCLOSURE WITH LOCK PER
PLANS; PAINTED FOREST
GREEN. INSTALL PER MFG'S
SPECIFICATIONS
3"MIN.
12" MIN.
4"
MIN.
2" MIN.
18" MIN.
24" MIN.
PROVIDE A 20" LOOP
IN WIRE AT ALL
CHANGES OF
DIRECTION
GREATER THAN 30'.
REMOVE TIES
AFTER ALL
CONNECTIONS HAVE
BEEN MADE.
INSTALL ALL
120 VOLT
WIRE IN
CONDUIT PER
LOCAL CODE.
SNAKE ALL PLASTIC PIPE
INTO TRENCHES
AS SHOWN.
ALL MAINLINE
SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER
MFG'S.
SPECIFICATIONS.
TAPE AND BUNDLE
WIRING AT 10 FT.
O.C. MAXIMUM.
MAIN SUPPLY,
LATERAL AND
WIRING
MAIN SUPPLY LATERAL 120 VOLT WIRING
LATERAL
MAINLINE
PER
LOCAL
CODE 18" * 12"
*
* 2 1/2" AND SMALLER: 18"
3" AND LARGER: 24" 12"
.
WIRING
FINISH GRADE
NETAFIM TL050 (3/4" FPT)
AUTOMATIC FLUSH VALVE
PVC SCH 40 3/4" MPT x 1/2"
SLIP REDUCING MALE
ADDAPTOR
FLEXIBLE PVC DRIP TUBING
3/4" Ø CRUSHED ROCK;
2 CU. FT. MIN.
PVC PIPE
PVC DRIP FLEX HOUSE OR
LATERAL
PVC SCH 80 ELL.
RAINBIRD AR AIR/VACUUM
RELIEF VALVE PVC SCH 80
REDUCER COUPLING
FINISH GRADE 12" 1" 3"
FLUSH VALVE
DRIP AIR-VACCUM RELIEF VALVE
10"Ø ROUND VALVE BOX
W/ LOCKING COVER.
BRAND "ARV" ON LID
SALCO DAS-8 ACCESS
SLEEVE. FROM EDGE OF PLANTING OR PAVING PER PLAN 6"
PER PLAN
FROM CONTROL VALVE
MANIFOLD; SEE CONTROL VALVE
DETAIL
PVC SCH 40 ELL, TYPICAL
LANDSCAPE DRIPLINE; INSTALL 2"-3"
BELOW FINISH GRADE
COMPRESSION ADAPTER, TYPICAL
VALVE DETAIL
PVC SCH 40 TEE, TYPICAL
FLUSH VALVE - FARTHEST FROM
VALVE @ LOWEST POINT, SEE
FLUSH VALVE DETAIL
FROM EDGE OF PLANTING OR
6" PAVING PVC RETURN HEADER
PVC SUPPLY HEADER. 3"
AIR RELIEF VALVE -
FARTHEST FROM VALVE
@ HIGHEST POINT, SEE
AIR RELIEF VALVE DTL
5X PIPE
DIA. MINIMUM
10X PIPE
DIA. MINIMUM
5 2" IN SHRUB
1" IN TURF
4 3
7 6
2 1
LEGEND
1. PLASTIC VALVE BOX W/
EXTENSIONS AS NECESSARY
AND LOCKING COVER
2. FINISH GRADE
3. WATERPROOF CONNECTION; 3M
SERIES 3500 SCOTCH-LOK OR
EQUAL.
4. TWO CONDUCTOR SHIELDED
CABLE- ROUTE TO CONTROLLER
VIA. CONDUIT.
5. FLOW SENSOR PER PLAN.
6. VALVE BOX EXTENSION.
7. PEA GRAVEL DRAIN SUMP; 30"
DIA. X 6" DEEP MIN.
FLOW FLOW
PVC SCH. 80 UNION.
DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SEE
LEGEND.
PVC SCH. 80 TEE FOR REGULATOR BYPASS.
USE ONLY WHERE SLOPE EXCEEDS 35' IN
HEIGHT.
PVC SCH. 80 STREET ELL. MALE ADAPTOR &
PVC CL 200 LATERAL FOR REGULATOR
BYPASS. USE ONLY WHERE SLOPE EXCEEDS
35' IN HEIGHT.
SALCO SR 40-32 REGULATOR.
PVC SCH. 80 MALE ADAPTOR.
"JUMBO" RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX
WITH LID; BRAND LID W/ VALVE NUMBER
AND "RCV".
PVC SCH. 80 ELL.
PVC MAINLINE.
PVC SCH. 80 BALL VALVE.
SALCO HYSF-100 FILTER W/ 120
MESH SCREEN.
PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE. TYPICAL.
3/4" Ø CRUSHED ROCK, 3 CU.FT.
PVC SCH. 80 ELLS (2).
PVC MAINLINE.
LABEL VALVE CONTROLLER ID # W/ PLASTIC
TAG ON VALVE AND ON VALVE BOX COVER
1 2
3 4
5 1
2 LEGEND:
ECO INDICATOR
3 4 PVC LATERAL PIPE
FINISHED GRADE
ADJACENT MULCH
5 SWING JOINT
Client:
Project location:
David Kellen
2701 Airport Ave., Ste 202
Santa Monica, CA 90405
310-245-3584
29329 Heathercliff Road
Malibu, CA 90265
Scale:
Date:
L A N D S C A P E
COURTLAND STUDIO, LLC
A R C H I T E E C T U R
505 E Colorado Blvd. Mezz C
Pasadena CA 91101
P: 818-788-9382
F: 818-788-3217
Licensed Landscape Architect #3620
S
ES
L I NEC No. 3620
C
A
date ___________
AT
E T
F C
O
NR F O LI
I A
T
Paul A. Lewis
C
LA
D
DS N
E
RA
E
TI H C
AP
___________
Exp. 2-28-25
IRRIGATION DETAILS
L-2.2
B DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE C QUICK COUPLER & BALL/GATE VALVE D REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE
F WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER G FLUSH VALVE & AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE H DRIP TUBING INSTALLATION
I PIPING & WIRING
E FLOW SENSOR
A MASTER CONTROL / SPRAY CONTROL VALVE
J ECO-ID INDICATOR K PGP ON SLOPE - NOT USED L MP ROTATOR 1/8" = 1'-0"
05/24/2023
2023-08-15 Heathercliff CD Set 2023-08-15 Heathercliff CD Set 280 APN
4468-
011
-
011
10.3%
8.4%
2.1% 3.1%
7.6%
F.H.
10.3%
7.6% 3.1% 2.1% 220
210
200
190
220
210
200
190
8.4%
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT
PROJECT INFORMATION:
1.5% 1.5%
14. WALKING ACCESS USED TO CONNECT VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL BE LEVEL, UNOBSTRUCTED BY LANDSCAPING, MINIMUM 5'-0" IN WIDTH, CLEAR TO THE SKY, ACCESSIBLE FOR FIREFIGHTING AND RESCUE PURPOSES. INDICATE ACCESS ON SITE PLAN.
15. ALL NEW SWIMMING POOLS, 5000 GALLONS OR MORE IN CAPACITY, LOCATED IN FIRE ZONE 4 OR VERY HIGH FIRE SEVERITY ZONE MAY REQUIRE AN AUXILIARY OUTLET.CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.
16. COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, 310.4 REGARDING ACCESS.17. FIRE RESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES FOR PROTECTION OF OPENINGS TO COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, 713.
18. WALLS AND SOFFITS OF ENCLOSED USABLE SPACE UNDER INTERIOR STAIRWAYS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE ENCLOSED BY BUILDING CODE 1006.12 SHALL BE PROTECTED ON THE ENCLOSED SIDE AS REQUIRED FOR ONE-HOUR RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION. TITLE 24, 1003.3.3.9.
19. ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED, TESTED AND ACCEPTED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. FIRE CODE 501.4.
20. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL MEASURE 6"X4"X2-1/2", BRASS OR BRONZE, CONFORMING TO AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARD C503, OR APPROVED EQUAL, AND
SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT REGULATION 8.
21. PLANS SHOWING UNDERGROUND PIPING FOR PRIVATE ON-SITE FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK UNIT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIORTO INSTALLATION. FIRE CODE 901.2, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT REGULATION 7
22. PROVIDE AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AS SET FORTH BY BUILDING CODE 903 AND FIRE CODE 903. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK UNIT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.REASON: RESIDENTIAL CODE & FIRE CODE 903.1 & FIRE FLOW REDUCTION TYPE OF FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2, 903.3.1.3
23. THE SECURITY GATE SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM ACCESS WIDTH OF 20 FEET. THE
SECURITY GATE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN APPROVED MEANS OF EMERGENCYOPERATION, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED OPERATIONAL AT ALL TIMES AND REPLACED OR REPAIRED WHEN DEFECTIVE. ELECTRIC GATE OPERATORS, WHERE PROVIDED, SHALL BE LISTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL 325. GATES INTENDED FOR AUTOMATIC OPERATION
SHALL BE DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED AND INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F220. GATES SHALL BE OF THE SWINGING OR SLIDING TYPE.
CONSTRUCTION OF GATES SHALL BE OF MATERIALS THAT ALLOW MANUAL OPERATION BY ONE PERSON. FIRE CODE 503.6. THE SECURITY MANUAL GATE OPERATOR SHALL BEPROVIDED FOR EMERGENCY OPERATION, AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED OPERATIONAL AT ALL TIMES.
FIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENTS
1. PROVIDE AND INDICATE ON SITE PLAN, FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS OR VEHICULAR TURN-AROUND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS BELOW OR PROVIDE A MINIMUM,UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF 20 FEET CLEAR TO SKY, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO WITHIN 150FEET OF ALL PORTIONS OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS. FIRE CODE 503.1.1 & 503.2.1.
2. FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICULAR ACCESS ROADS MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN A SERVICEABLE MANNER PRIOR TO AND DURING THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. FIRE CODE 901.3.
3. THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE HYDRANTS AT THIS LOCATION IS 1,250 GALLONS PER MINUTE, AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE, FOR A DURATION OF 2 HOURS, OVER AND ABOVE THE MAXIMUM DAILY DOMESTIC DEMAND. FIRE CODE 507.3 AND APPENDIX B105.1APPENDIX B. FIRE FLOW MAY BE OBTAINED FROM PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANT FLOWING SIMULTANEOUSLY.
4. COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, 310.9.1 REGARDING FIRE WARNING SYSTEMS. SMOKE DETECTORS TO BE HAND WIRED WITH BATTERY BACKUP. WHEN MORE THAN ONE SMOKE ALARM IS INSTALLED, `THEY SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT THE OPERATION OF ANY SMOKE ALARM CAUSES THE ALARM IN ALL SMOKE ALARMS WITHIN THE DWELLING UNITTO SOUND (CALIFORNIA ALARM CODE). PROVIDE NOTE ON SITE PLAN AND INDICATE ON FLOOR PLAN.
5. PROVIDE ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE OCCUPANCY SEPARATION BETWEEN THE R-3 DWELLING AND THE GARAGE. (INDICATE ON FLOOR PLAN.)
6. EXIT DOORS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF OPENING WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. BUILDING CODE 1003.3.1.8.
7. WIDTH AND HEIGHT OF REQUIRED EXIT DOORWAYS SHALL COMPLY WITH TITLE 24. (INDICATE ON DOOR SCHEDULE).
8. BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS TO BE PROVIDED ON FRONT OF ALL BUILDINGS AND SHALL BE VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. NUMBERS SHALLCONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND. FIRE CODE 901.4.4.
9. PROVIDE A KEY BOX AS REQUIRED BY FIRE CODE 904.2 LOCATION AT GATE.
10. PROVIDE APPROVED SIGNS OR OTHER APPROVED NOTICES OR MARKINGS THAT INCLUDE THE WORDS NO PARKING-FIRE LANE. SIGNS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 12INCHES WIDE BY 18 INCHES HIGH AND HAVE RED LETTERS ON A WHITE REFLECTIVE BACKGROUND. SIGNS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS, TO
CLEARLY INDICATE THE ENTRANCE TO SUCH ROAD, OR PROHIBIT THE OBSTRUCTION THEREOF AND AT INTERVALS, AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE INSPECTOR. FIRE CODE 503.3
11. PRIVATE ROADS USED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING THE WEIGHT OF A 25-TON VEHICLE.
12. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS LESS THAN 10% SLOPE, AND NOT PAVED TO PUBLIC
WORKS STANDARDS, REQUIRE CERTIFICATION FROM A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEERSTATING THE ROAD MEETS OR EXCEEDS ALL-WEATHER STANDARDS OF LA CO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.
13. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS 10% OR GREATER SLOPE SHALL BE PAVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. C -
These drawings are instruments of service and are the property of Planex Associates. All designs and other information on the drawings are for use on the specific project and shall not be used otherwise without written permission of Planex Associates c DATE:
BY NO. DATE REVISION
PFN: 1909-495
DATE:
SIGNED
SHEET OF
FIRE ACCESS EXHIBIT
1 FD WILL ACCEPT NOW (CONCEPT) BUT BEFORE
FINAL APPROVAL DELINEATE SLOPEPERCENTAGE THROUGH OUT CURVE. CIVIL ENGINEER MIGHT BE REQUIRED
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE PREVENTION ENGINEERING
APPROVED
ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ONLY
By__________________________ Fire Prevention EngineerDate________________________ Johnnie McGee
11/17/2020
PLAN# FEPC 2020-1457
281
282
BIOLOGY REVIEW
REFERRAL SHEET
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4804 (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 456-7650
FROM:
TO: City of Malibu Biologist
City of Malibu Planning Department REVISED DATE09/07/2023 JOB ADDRESS: 29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD
APPLICANT / CONTACT: Alan Hajjar
APPLICANT ADDRESS: 5905 Greyrock Road
APPLICANT PHONE #: (818)383-1800
APPLICANT FAX #:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NSFR
Agoura Hills, CA 91301
PROJECT NUMBER: CDP 20-003
APPLICANT EMAIL: [email protected]
Malibu Planning Department and/or Applicant
FROM: City Biologist, Courtney McCammon
PLANNER: Allison Cook
TO:
The project review package is INCOMPLETE and; CANNOT proceed through Final Planning Review until corrections and conditions from Biological Review are incorporated into the proposed project design
(See Attached).
The project is APPROVED, consistent with City Goals & Policies associated with the protection of biological resources and CAN proceed through the Planning process.
The project may have the potential to significantly impact the following resources, either individually or cumulatively: Sensitive Species or Habitat, Watersheds, and/or Shoreline Resources and therefore Requires Review by the Environmental Review Board (ERB).
Signature Date
Additional requirements/conditions may be imposed upon review of plan revision Contact Information:
Courtney McCammon, City Biologist, [email protected], (310) 456-2489, extension 277 Rev 05/29/2018
X
9/13/23
ATTACHMENT 3
283
City of Malibu
Biology ● Planning Department
23825 Stuart Ranch Road · Malibu, California · 90265-4861 Phone (310) 456-2489 · Fax (310) 456-3356 · www.malibucity.org
Recycled Paper
BIOLOGY REVIEW SHEET
PROJECT INFORMATION
Applicant:
(name and email)
Alan Hajjar
[email protected]
Project Address: 29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD
Malibu, CA 90265
Planning Case No.: CDP 20-003
Project Description: NSFR
Date of Review: September 13, 2023
Reviewer:
Courtney McCammon Signature:
Contact Information: Phone: (310) 456-2489 ext 277 Email: [email protected]
SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
Site Plan: 7/19/23
Site Survey: 7/19/23
Landscape Plan: 9/7/23
Hydrozone Plan: 9/7/23
Irrigation Plan: 9/7/23
Fuel Modification Plan: 9/7/23
Grading Plan: 7/19/23
OWTS Plan: 7/19/23
Bio Assessment:
Bio Inventory:
Native Tree Survey:
Native Tree Protection
Plan:
Miscellaneous:
Previous Reviews: 1/28/20 (Incomplete), 5/3/23 (Incomplete), 6/13/23 (Incomplete), 7/7/23 (Incomplete), 8/1/23 (Incomplete)
REVIEW FINDINGS
Review Status: INCOMPLETE: Additional information and/or a response to the listed review comments is required.
APPROVED: The project has been approved with regards to biological impacts.
CANNNOT APPROVE AS SUBMITTED: The proposed project does not conform to the requirements of the MMC and/or LCP.
ERB: This project has the potential to impact ESHA and may require review by the Environmental Review Board pursuant to LIP Section 4.4.4 284
City of Malibu Biology Review Sheet
CDP 20-003
29329 Heathercliff Road
September 13, 2023
DISCUSSION:
1. The Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) for this project totals 88,340 gallons per year (gpy). The Estimated Applied Water Use (EAWU) totals 58,611 gpy. Therefore, the project meets the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance Requirements.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. The project is recommended for APPROVAL with the following conditions:
A. Prior to installation of any landscaping, the applicant shall obtain plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division.
B. Prior to or at the time of a Planning final inspection, the property owner/applicant shall submit to the case planner a copy of the plumbing permit for the irrigation system installation that has been signed off by the Building Safety Division.
C. Prior to final Planning inspection or other final project sign off (as applicable), the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director for review and approval a certificate of completion in accordance with the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance (MMC Chapter 9.22). The certificate shall include the property owner’s signed acceptance of responsibility for maintaining the landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans and MMC Chapter 9.22. (form attached) D. Prior to Final Plan Check Approval, if your property is serviced by the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29, please provide landscape water use approval from that department.
For approval contact:
Roberto Perez Sandoval
Address: 23533 West Civic Center Way, Malibu, CA 90265-4804 Email: [email protected] (Preferred)
Phone: (310) 317-1389
Paul Van Suchtelen
Address: 23533 West Civic Center Way, Malibu, CA 90265-4804 Email: [email protected] (Preferred)
Phone: (310) 317-0209
Please note this action may require several weeks. As such, the applicant should submit their approved landscape plans to DPW as soon as feasible in order to avoid a delay at plan check.
E. Vegetation forming a view impermeable condition (hedge), serving the same function as a fence or wall, occurring within the side or rear yard setback shall be maintained at or below six feet in height. View impermeable hedges occurring within the front yard setback serving the same function as a fence or wall shall be maintained at or below 42 inches in height. Three sequential 285
City of Malibu Biology Review Sheet
CDP 20-003
29329 Heathercliff Road
September 13, 2023
violations of this condition will result in a requirement to permanently remove the vegetation from the site.
F. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to obstruct the primary view from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth).
G. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City of Malibu, are prohibited.
H. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.
I. No development is permitted on slopes steeper than 4:1.
J. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote and copper arsenate.
K. Grading/excavation/vegetation removal scheduled between February 1 - September 15 will require nesting bird surveys by a qualified biologist prior to initiation of such activities. Surveys shall be completed no more than five days from proposed initiation of site preparation activities. Should active nests be identified, a buffer area no less than 150 feet (300 feet for raptors) shall be fenced off until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. A report discussing the results of the surveys shall be turned in to the City within two business days of completion of surveys.
L. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded so it is directed downward and inward so that there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. Up-lighting is prohibited.
2. PRIOR TO ISSUING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, the City Biologist shall inspect the project site and determine that all planning conditions to protect natural resources are in compliance with the approved plans.
-o0oIf you have any questions regarding the above requirements, please contact the City Biologist office at your earliest convenience.
cc: Planning Project file
Planning Department
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Road • Malibu, California 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 • Fax (310) 456-3356 • www.malibucity.org
GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW SHEET
Project Information
Date: December 12, 2023 Review Log #: 4615
Site Address: 29329 Heathercliff Road
Lot/Tract/PM #: n/a Planning #: CDP 20-003
Applicant/Contact: Alan Hajjar, [email protected] BPC/GPC #:
Contact Phone #: 818-383-1800 Fax #: Planner:
Project Type: New one-story single-family residence with basement, OWTS Submittal Information
Consultant(s) / Report
Date(s):
(Current submittal(s) in Bold.)
Leighton & Associates, Inc. (Geoffrey F., CEG 2512; Hennessey, R., RCE 86902): 11-30-23, 10-27-23, 9-10-23, 9-3-2020, 3-12-20, 11-27- 2019
Architectural Plans by David Kellen & Associates, Inc., dated September 21, 2023, March 19, 2023, January 9, 2020.
Preliminary Grading Plan by Planex Associates dated July 17, 2023, December 12, 2019.
Topography Survey by Elias Chaij, Survey date: May 29, 2019.
Previous Reviews: 11-16-23, 10-9-2023, 9-10-20, 8-18-2020, 1-29-2020; Review Findings
Coastal Development Permit Review
The residential development project is APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective.
The residential development project is NOT APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective. The listed ‘Review Comments’ shall be addressed prior to approval.
Building Plan-Check Stage Review
Awaiting Building plan check submittal. Please respond to the listed ‘Building Plan-Check Stage Review Comments’ AND review and incorporate the attached ‘Geotechnical Notes for Building Plan Check’ into the plans.
APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective. Please review the attached ‘Geotechnical Notes for Building Plan Check’ and incorporate into Building Plan-Check submittals.
NOT APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective. The listed ‘Building Plan-Check Stage Review Comments’ shall be addressed prior to Building Plan-Check Stage approval.
Remarks
The referenced geotechnical reports and plans were reviewed by the City from a geotechnical perspective.
Based on the submitted information, the project includes the construction of a new single-family residence with basement, and a new Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS). Grading consists of 960 yards of R 293
City of Malibu Geotechnical Review Sheet
(MAL6060) – 2 –
& R; 673 yards of cut and 102 yards of fill under the structure; 343 yards of fill for safety; 396 yards of cut and zero yards of fill non- exempt; and 624 yards of export. We understand that a revised plan is currently available that includes a change in the location of the proposed swimming pool and a first floor room addition. The pool will be above ground located immediately east of the residence.
Building Plan Check Review Comments:
1. Please submit a fee of $ 1,179.00 to City geotechnical staff for building plan check review.
2. The consultant should evaluate the potential for interaction (example: lateral surcharge) between the closely located retaining walls and between the basement sidewalls and adjacent foundations/structures.
Using the 1:1 criterion for lateral surcharge is not acceptable for lateral surcharge unless substantiated by analyses and/or references. Footings below a 1:1 plane behind walls could laterally surcharge the walls.
Lateral surcharge behind any proposed retaining walls needsto be evaluated using an appropriate method (e.g.: 1- Spangler & Handy {1982}, Soil Engineering, fourth Edition, Harper & Row, New York; 2- Navy Design Manual NAVFAC DM-7.2, Figures 11 & 12).
3. Section 7.4 of the City’s geotechnical guidelines requires a minimum thickness of 10 mils for vapor barriers beneath slabs-on-grade. The Project Geotechnical Engineer has recommended that the vapor barrier be a minimum thickness of 15 mils, conform to ASTM E1745 Class A requirements, and be installed in accordance with ASTM E1643. Building plans shall reflect the Consultant’s recommendation.
4. The following notes must be added to the grading plan:
a. The geotechnical consultant should determine the expansion potential of the finish grade materials at the completion of grading. Foundation design recommendations should be revised if the expansion potential of finish grade materials substantially differs from the assumed expansion range. b. At the completion of grading, samples of the onsite soils should be collected and tested for corrosion potential. Final recommendations for mitigation measures including cement type should be based on the corrosion potential of the finish grade materials.
c. The geotechnical consultant should determine at the completion of grading the R-value of the finish grade materials within parking and access road areas. Final pavement design should be based on the actual R-value of the finish grade materials.
5. An as-built report shall be submitted to the City for review. This report prepared by the Geotechnical Consultant must include the results of all compaction tests as well as a map depicting the limits of fill, locations and elevations of all density tests, outline and elevations of all removal bottoms, keyway locations and bottom elevations, locations of all subdrains and flow line elevations, and location and elevation of all retaining wall backdrains and outlets. Geologic conditions exposed during grading must be depicted on an as-built geologic map.
6. Two sets of final Grading, Retaining Wall, Swimming Pool/Spas, Guest House, and Residence plans (APPROVED BY BUILDING AND SAFETY) incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations and items in this review sheet must be reviewed and wet stamped and manually signed by the Project Engineering Geologist and Project Geotechnical Engineer. City geotechnical staff will review the plans for conformance with the Project Geotechnical Consultants’ recommendations and items in this review sheet over the counter at City Hall. Appointments for final review and approval of the plans may be made by calling or emailing City Geotechnical staff. 294
City of Malibu Geotechnical Review Sheet
(MAL6060) – 3 –
Please direct questions regarding this review sheet to City Geotechnical staff listed below.
Engineering Geology Review by: 12/12/2023
Christopher Sexton, C.E.G. #1441, Exp. 11-30-24 Date
Engineering Geology Reviewer (805-496-1222)
Email: [email protected]
Geotechnical Engineering Review by: _______________________________ 12/12/2020 Ali Abdel-Haq, G.E. #2308, Exp. 12-31-25 Date
Geotechnical Engineering Reviewer (805-496-1222)
Email: [email protected]
This review sheet was prepared by representatives of Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc. and GeoDynamics, Inc., contracted through Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc., as an agent of the City of Malibu.
295
City of Malibu
– GEOTECHNICAL –
NOTES FOR BUILDING PLAN-CHECK
The following standard items should be incorporated into Building Plan-Check submittals, as appropriate:
1. One set of grading, retaining wall, swimming pool and spas, guest house, and residence plans, incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations and items in this review sheet, must be submitted to City geotechnical staff for review. Additional review comments may be raised at that time that may require a response.
2. Show the name, address, and phone number of the Project Geotechnical Consultant(s) on the cover sheet of the Building, Seawall, and Grading Plans.
3. Include the following note on Grading and Foundation Plans: “Subgrade soils shall be tested for Expansion Index prior to pouring footings or slabs; Foundation Plans shall be reviewed and revised by the Project Geotechnical Consultant, as appropriate.”
4. Include the following note on the Foundation Plans: “All foundation excavations must be observed and approved by the Project Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of reinforcing steel.”
5. The Foundation Plans for the proposed project shall clearly depict the embedment material and minimum depth of embedment for the foundations in accordance with the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations.
6. Show the onsite wastewater treatment system on the Site Plan.
7. Please contact the Building and Safety Department regarding the submittal requirements for a grading and drainage plan review.
8. A comprehensive Site Drainage Plan, incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations, shall be included in the Plans. Show all area drains, outlets, and non-erosive drainage devices on the Plans. Water shall not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over descending slopes.
Grading Plans (as Applicable)
1. Grading Plans shall clearly depict the limits and depths of overexcavation, as applicable.
2. Prior to final approval of the project, an as-built compaction report prepared by the Project Geotechnical Consultant must be submitted to the City for review. The report must include the results of all density tests as well as a map depicting the limits of fill, locations of all density tests, locations and elevations of all removal bottoms, locations and elevations of all keyways and back drains, and locations and elevations of all retaining wall backdrains and outlets.
Geologic conditions exposed during grading must be depicted on an as-built geologic map. This comment must be included as a note on the grading plans.
Retaining Walls (As Applicable)
1. Show retaining wall backdrain and backfill design, as recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant, on the Plans.
2. Retaining walls separate from a residence require separate permits. Contact the Building and Safety Department for permit information. One set of retaining wall plans shall be submitted to the City for review by City geotechnical staff. Additional concerns may be raised at that time which may require a response by the Project Geotechnical Consultant and applicant.
296
PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW
REFERRAL SHEET
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 456-7650
FROM:
TO:
City of Malibu Planning Department
Public Works Department
REVISED DATE 07/19/2023
APPLICANT / CONTACT: Alan Hajjar
APPLICANT ADDRESS: 5905 Greyrock Road
APPLICANT PHONE #: (818)383-1800
APPLICANT FAX #:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NSFR
Agoura Hills, CA 91301
PROJECT NUMBER: CDP 20-003
JOB ADDRESS: 29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD
TO: Malibu Planning Department and/or Applicant
FROM: Public Works Department
The following items described on the attached memorandum shall be addressed and resubmitted.
The project was reviewed and found to be in conformance with the City’s Public Works and LCP policies and CAN proceed through the Planning process.
SIGNATURE DATE
APPLICANT EMAIL: [email protected]
Rev 120910
X
8/8/2023
297
1 O:\Database\PWExport\29329 Heathercliff Rd - _CDP 20-003 PublicWorksStandardConditionTemplate.doc Recycled Paper
City of Malibu
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Planning Department
From: Public Works Department
Nathaniel McLean, Assistant Civil Engineer
Date: August 8, 2023
Re: Proposed Conditions of Approval for 29329 Heathercliff Rd, CDP 20-003 The Public Works Department has reviewed the plans submitted for the above referenced project.
Based on this review sufficient information has been submitted to confirm that conformance with the Malibu Local Coastal Plan (LCP) and the Malibu Municipal Code (MMC) can be attained.
Prior to the issuance of building and grading permits, the applicant shall comply with the following conditions.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
1. Clearing and grading during the rainy season (extending from November 1 to March 31) shall be prohibited for development LIP Section 17.3.1 that:
• Is located within or adjacent to ESHA, or
• Includes grading on slopes greater than 4:1
• Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4:1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading operations before the rainy season. If grading operations are not completed before the rainy season begins, grading shall be halted and temporary erosion control measures shall be put into place to minimize erosion until grading resumes after March 31, unless the City determines that completion of grading would be more protective of resources
2. Exported soil from a site shall be taken to the County Landfill or to a site with an active grading permit and the ability to accept the material in compliance with the City’s LIP Section 8.3. A note shall be placed on the project that addresses this condition.
3. A grading and drainage plan shall be approved containing the following information prior to the issuance of grading permits for the project.
298
2 O:\Database\PWExport\29329 Heathercliff Rd - _CDP 20-003 PublicWorksStandardConditionTemplate.doc Recycled Paper
• Public Works Department General Notes
• The existing and proposed square footage of impervious coverage on the property shall be shown on the grading plan (including separate areas for buildings, driveways, walkways, parking, tennis courts and pool decks). • The limits of land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated on the grading plan and a total area shall be shown on the plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits of grading, areas disturbed for the installation of the septic system, and areas disturbed for the installation of the detention system shall be included within the area delineated.
• The grading limits shall include the temporary cuts made for retaining walls, buttresses, and over excavations for fill slopes and shall be shown on the grading plan.
• If the property contains trees that are to be protected they shall be highlighted on the grading plan.
• If the property contains rare and endangered species as identified in the resources study the grading plan shall contain a prominent note identifying the areas to be protected (to be left undisturbed). Fencing of these areas shall be delineated on the grading plan if required by the City Biologist.
• Private storm drain systems shall be shown on the grading plan. Systems greater than 12-inch diameter shall also have a plan and profile for the system included with the grading plan.
• Public storm drain modifications shown on the grading plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit.
4. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMP’s shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show all storm drain lines, inlets, outlet, postconstruction BMP’s and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements.
STORMWATER
5. A Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall be provided prior to the issuance of the Grading/Building permits for the project. This plan shall include an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) that includes, but not limited to:
Erosion Controls Scheduling
Preservation of Existing
Vegetation
Sediment Controls Silt Fence
Sand Bag Barrier
Stabilized Construction Entrance
Non-Storm Water Water Conservation Practices
Management Dewatering Operations
299
3 O:\Database\PWExport\29329 Heathercliff Rd - _CDP 20-003 PublicWorksStandardConditionTemplate.doc Recycled Paper
Waste Management Material Delivery and Storage
Stockpile Management
Spill Prevention and Control
Solid Waste Management
Concrete Waste Management
Sanitary/Septic Waste
Management
All Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be in accordance to the latest version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) BMP Handbook. Designated areas for the storage of construction materials, solid waste management, and portable toilets must not disrupt drainage patterns or subject the material to erosion by site runoff.
6. A Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) is required for this project. Storm drainage improvements are required to mitigate increased runoff generated by property development. The applicant shall have the choice of one method specified within the City’s Local Implementation Plan Section 17.3.2.B.2. The SWMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage of the site. The SWMP shall identify the Site design and Source control Best Management Practices (BMP’s) that have been implemented in the design of the project (See LIP Chapter 17 Appendix A).
The SWMP shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading/building permits for this project.
7. A Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP) is required for this project. The WQMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage of the site. The WQMP shall meet all the requirements of the City’s current Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System (MS4) permit. The following elements shall be included within the WQMP:
• Site Design Best Management Practices (BMP’s)
• Source Control BMP’s
• Treatment Control BMP’s that retains on-site the Stormwater Quality Design Volume (SWQDv). Or where it is technical infeasible to retain on-site, the project must biofiltrate 1.5 times the SWQDv that is not retained on-site. • Drainage Improvements
• A plan for the maintenance and monitoring of the proposed treatment BMP’s for the expected life of the structure.
• A copy of the WQMP shall be filed against the property to provide constructive notice to future property owners of their obligation to maintain the water quality measures installed during construction prior to the issuance of grading or building permits.
• The WQMP shall be submitted to Public Works Department and the fee applicable at time of submittal for the review of the WQMP shall be paid prior to the start of the 300
4 O:\Database\PWExport\29329 Heathercliff Rd - _CDP 20-003 PublicWorksStandardConditionTemplate.doc Recycled Paper
technical review. The WQMP shall be approved prior to the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading and drainage plan and or building plans.
The Public Works Department will tentatively approve the plan and will keep a copy until the completion of the project. Once the project is completed, the applicant shall verify the installation of the BMP’s, make any revisions to the WQMP, and resubmit to the Public Works Department for approval. The original signed and notarized document shall be recorded with the County Recorder. A copy of the WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the certificate of occupancy.
MISCELLANOUS
8. The developer’s consulting engineer shall sign the final plans prior to the issuance of permits.
9. The discharge of swimming pool, spa and decorative fountain water and filter backwash, including water containing bacteria, detergents, wastes, alagecides or other chemicals is prohibited. Swimming pool, spa, and decorative fountain water may be used as landscape irrigation only if the following items are met:
• The discharge water is dechlorinated, debrominated or if the water is disinfected using ozonation;
• There are sufficient BMPs in place to prevent soil erosion; and • The discharge does not reach into the MS4 or to the ASBS (including tributaries) Discharges not meeting the above-mentioned methods must be trucked to a Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Works.
The applicant shall also provide a construction note on the plans that directs the contractor to install a new sign stating “It is illegal to discharge pool, spa or water feature waters to a street, drainage course or storm drain per MMC 13.04.060(D)(5).” The new sign shall be posted in the filtration and/or pumping equipment area for the property. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall indicate the method of disinfection and the method of discharging.
301
LOS ANGELES COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICTS
P. O. Box 1460 260 East Avenue K-8 23533 Civic Center Way Alhambra, CA 91802 Lancaster, CA 93535 Malibu, CA 90265 Telephone: (626) 300-3306 Telephone: (661) 942-1157 Telephone: (310) 317-1389 TO:
❑ Los Angeles County
Department of Public Health
Environmental Health:
Drinking Water /Land Use Program
5050 Commerce Drive
Baldwin Park, CA 91706-1423
❑ City of Lancaster
Building Department
44933 N. Fern Ave.
Lancaster, CA 93534
❑ Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works
Building &Safety Division
Q City of Malibu
Building Department
23815 W. Stuart Ranch Rd.
Malibu, CA 90265
RE: 29329 HEATHERCLIFF ROAD
Address
❑ Los Angeles County
Fire Department
❑ City of Palmdale
Building Department
38300 N. Sierra Hwy.
Palmdale. CA 93550
MALIBU 90265
City Zip Code
APN # 4468-011-011
Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29
Will serve water to the above sin_gle lof property subject to the following conditions:
~ Annexation of the property into Los Angeles County Waterworks District is required. Water service to this ro ert will not be issued until the annexation is com leted. ❑D The appropriate fees must be paid to the District and other related water agencies. ~ The appropriate service connection fees have been paid to Waterworks Districts for the existing service connection.
❑ The property has an existing water meter.
~ The appropriate connection fees have been paid to Waterworks Districts for the proposed service.
~ Water system improvements will be required to be installed by the developer subject to the requirements set by the Fire Department and the District. 0 Water meter serving the property must be installed in accordance with Waterworks' District standards.
~ Public water system and sewage disposal system must be in compliance with Health Department separation requirements.
0 A portion of the existing fronting water main may be required to be replaced or upgraded if the water service tap cannot be made or if damage occurs to the water main.
D Property may experience low water pressure and / or shortage in high demand periods. ❑ The District CAN NOT serve water to this property at this time. ❑x Must comply with and satisfy City of Malibu requirements in order to obtain Water Service. ~ A USC approved backflow device is required for this property and is to be installed and maintained by the property owner.
p This Will Serve Letter is for a new 4,570 sq. ft. single-family residence.
By: ~ ~
S' n u re
Dave Rydman
Senior Civil Engineer
Print Name
(310) 456-6621 x238 ~ ~ ~~~
Phone Number Date
* THIS WILL SERVE LETTER WILL EXPIRE ONE YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF ISSUANCE.
Rev. 06/09
302
ANTHONY C. MARRONE
FIRE CHIEF
FORESTER & FIRE WARDEN
“Proud Protectors of Life,
the Environment, and Property”
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
FIRE DEPARTMENT
FUEL MODIFICATION UNIT
605 NORTH ANGELENO AVENUE
AZUSA, CA 91702
(626) 969-5205
[email protected]
www.fire.lacounty.gov/forestry-division/forestry-fuelmodification/
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
JANICE HAHN, CHAIR
FOURTH DISTRICT
HILDA L. SOLIS
FIRST DISTRICT
HOLLY J. MITCHELL
SECOND DISTRICT
LINDSEY P. HORVATH
THIRD DISTRICT
KATHRYN BARGER
FIFTH DISTRICT
SERVING THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND THE CITIES OF:
AGOURA HILLS
ARTESIA
AZUSA
BALDWIN PARK
BELL
BELL GARDENS
BELLFLOWER
BRADBURY
CALABASAS
CARSON
CERRITOS
CLAREMONT
COMMERCE
COVINA
CUDAHY
DIAMOND BAR
DUARTE
EL MONTE
GARDENA
GLENDORA
HAWAIIAN GARDENS
HAWTHORNE
HERMOSA BEACH
HIDDEN HILLS
HUNTINGTON PARK
INDUSTRY
INGLEWOOD
IRWINDALE
LA CANADA-FLINTRIDGE
LA HABRA
LA MIRADA
LA PUENTE
LAKEWOOD
LANCASTER
LAWNDALE
LOMITA
LYNWOOD
MALIBU
MAYWOOD
NORWALK
PALMDALE
PALOS VERDES ESTATES
PARAMOUNT
PICO RIVERA
POMONA
RANCHO PALOS VERDES
ROLLING HILLS
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES
ROSEMEAD
SAN DIMAS
SANTA CLARITA
SIGNAL HILL
SOUTH EL MONTE
SOUTH GATE
TEMPLE CITY
VERNON
WALNUT
WEST HOLLYWOOD
WESTLAKE VILLAGE
WHITTIER
July 12, 2023
Dear Applicant:
FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN – 29329 HEATHERCLIFF RD, CITY OF MALIBU PARCEL #4468-011-011 FM PROJECT #10803 – FFFM #202300195 The Final Fuel Modification Plan has been reviewed and approved. Occupancy is subject to onsite inspection and approval of required fuel modification. Inspections are to be performed by Forestry Division personnel.
Questions regarding this response should be directed to the Fuel Modification Unit. Office hours are Monday through Thursday, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Plan checkers are available 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and by appointment. The Fuel Modification Unit may best be reached by email using our office email ([email protected]).
Very truly yours,
WILLIAM ROMO, ASSISTANT CHIEF, FORESTRY DIVISION
PREVENTION SERVICES BUREAU
WR:ls
Enclosures
303
304
ATTACHMENT 4
305
- ~ -.'., - . ,.,..'_- ,. " '~' ,'" '..-',"" _~".'"~ _"," ,:,~-",-.."~.-,,,"_-,,'~-_-~'_'_ LCP liiterpretation
Number: 16
Dated: November 2, 2005
Amended: N/A
Planning'Manager: CJ Amstru~
LCP Section: LIP Sections 13.13, 13.26, and 13.27
Title: RidQelines
Issue: Primary and secondary ridgelines are defined in LIP Chapter 2. LIP Section 6.5(C)(1) regulates development on primary and secondary' ridgelines. UP Section 6.2 and LUP Section 6.4 describe how scenic resources are applied. However, these LCP ,sections provide inconsistent direction about how to implement protection of primary and sec~ndary ridgelines.
Interpretation: On October 24, 2005, the City Council concurred with the following procedure regarding ridgelines.
1. First, if a ridgeliné feature is present in the vicinity of the project site, stàff wjl determine if potentially.significant adverse effects on scenic resources, could result from, the project.
According to LIP Section 6.3, ridgelilie standards only ,apply if the ridge is visible from scenic areas, scenic roads,or public viewing areas and the project site is visible from. soonic areas, scenÎc roads, or public viewing areas and the project could, result in potentially significant adverse impacts regarding scenic resources.
2. Second, staff will determin.e if a project site is located within a largely developed or built out , , area. 'According to LUP Section 6.4, ridgeline, development standards are not applied to largely developed or built out areas.
· Staff wil work. with applicants to determine neighborhood boundaries, utilzing the' criteria described in, LIP ,Section 3.6(L) (Neighborhood Standards) to guide, development of the neighborhood boundaries. ,
· A peroontage' of the parcels within the neighborhood that are developed wia be determined. In order to be considered developed, the parcel must accommodate uses normally'relàted ,to human activities. , All parcels with primary uses are considered , developed. In addition, parcels with acCessory structures (such as swimming pools, ' tennis courts, 'second residential units, etc.), parcels with structures under construction, or other parcels actively utilzed on a consistent basis for human activities ' (such as sports fields) are considared'developed.
\
P:\LCP 2002 Implement\LCP Interpretatins\FinalInterpretationsMarch2005\CPlllterp16Ridgelines.dDC '/
ATTACHMENT 5
306
,."
· If at least 65 percent of the parcels within a neighborhood are developed, it wil be considered largely developed or built out.
Parcels in neighborhoods that are considered largely developed or buiWout wil not be subject to ridgeline standards, unless' development of' the project site could result in potentially significant impacts on visual resources.
3. _ Third, staff wil determine if the LCP's ridge line standards apply. According to LIP Section 6.2, ridgeline development standards do not apply to existing flat, undeveloped building pads, existing flat developed sites, or other gently sloping areas (i.e., exhibiting slopes less than 20 percent) on landform features that may ext:ibit ridgelines qualities. In these cases, development may proooed without a vanance to ridg~line standards, provided that such development could comply with all other LCP, deveiopment standards, and the project 'site does not include, any areas exceeding 20 percent in slope. The "project site" includes any 'areas disturbed to accommodate structures for the development. Ridgelinestandards only apply to those portions" of the parcel that meet the definition of ridgeline, and not the entire parceL. In order to not count holes, rocks, and other small topographic changes, applicants ,may be req~ired to submit a color-coded slope analysis map based on 10..foot contour intervals. '
4. Fourth, 'staff wil determine if. the ridgeline feature meets the LCP's ridgeline definitions. For ,pç,oject sites on ridgeline features that include areas exceeding 20' percent slope, arid meet all other LCP applicability Jhre~holds for scenic resqurce protection,. ridgeline development standards 'apply. In such cases, an analysis shall be submitted by the "applicanftodetermine if a ridgeline feature meets the' LCP ridgelinedefinitions. If the ridgeline feature, does not meet the UP's ridgeline definitions, then ,development may proceed without a variance. In such .' cases, conditions of approval couid be imposed to minimize potentially signifcant adverse impacts. However, if the analysis determined that a structure would be placed on a primary or ' 'secondary'ridgeline, thana vanance or res'iting, of the 'structure, would be, required. Such , structures wouldbe.limited to one story in height. In thes.e cases, conditions of approval could , beiniPosed to minimize potentially significant adverse impacts. , ,
, i
, t
\
"'",
P:\LCP 2002 tmpleinEi\lCp InterpretationS\FirialinterpetationSMaich2oo5\LCPlnterp16Ridgeline5.doc 307
Story Pole Photos
29329 Heathercliff Road
Note: The tallest story poles indicate 21 feet in height. The actual tallest height of the structure is now proposed at 18 feet.
1. View on-site from the eastern edge (at area of access easement), looking westerly toward PCH.
308
ATTACHMENT 6
2. View near southern edge of site, looking northerly.
309
3. View at southeastern corner of site looking northwest. 310
4. View from southwestern area of site looking northwest. 311
5. View from southeastern area of site (downslope) looking northwest. 312
6. View from western edge of the PCH, looking easterly toward the site. 313
7. Neighbor’s View: view from PVD at 29257 Heathercliff Road, looking southerly. 314
8. Neighbor’s View: view from PVD at 29327 Heathercliff Road, looking westerly. 315
City Of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Malibu, CA 90265
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Nගඑඋඍ ඎ Pඝඊඔඑඋ Hඍඉකඑඖඏ
Phone (310) 456-2489
www.malibucity.org
Nගඑඋඍ ඎ Pඝඊඔඑඋ Hඍඉකඑඖඏ
The Malibu Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Monday, October 7, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Malibu City Hall, 23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu, CA and via teleconference, for the project identified below.
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 20-003 AND MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 20-001 - An application to construct a new 4,050-square-foot, split-level, 18-foot tall, two-story single-family residence with an attached 390- square-foot garage, a swimming pool, landscaping, hardscape, retaining walls, grading, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system; including a minor modification for up to a 50 percent reduction of the front yard setback
LOCATION / APN / ZONING: 29329 Heathercliff Rd / 4468-011-011 / Rural Residential-One Acre (RR-1) APPLICANT / OWNER: Schmitz and Associates, Inc. / ACS International LLC APPEALABLE TO: City Council
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Categorical Exemption CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303(a) and 15303(e) APPLICATION FILED: January 9, 2020
CASE PLANNER: Allison Cook, Contract Planner, [email protected] (805) 415-1991
A written staff report will be available at or before the hearing for the projects. All persons wishing to address the Commission regarding these matters will be afforded an opportunity in accordance with the Commission’s procedures. Copies of all related documents can be reviewed by any interested person at City Hall during regular business hours. Oral and written comments may be presented to the Planning Commission on, or before, the date of the meeting.
LOCAL APPEAL - A decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by an aggrieved person by written statement setting forth the grounds for appeal. An appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten days following the date of action which the appeal is made and shall be accompanied by an appeal form and filing fee, as specified by the City Council. Appeal forms may be found online at www.malibucity.org/planningforms or in person at City Hall, or by calling (310) 456-2489, extension 246.
IF YOU CHALLENGE THE CITY’S ACTION IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU
OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY, AT OR PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING.
MAUREEN TAMURI, Interim Planning Director Date: September 26, 2024 ATTACHMENT 7
316
From: Nora M. Martin-Resnick
To: Planning Commission
Cc: Justin R. Trujillo; Kenneth A. Ehrlich
Subject: Administrative Coastal Development Permit No. 20-003 And Minor Modification No. 20-001 Date: Friday, May 24, 2024 9:36:21 AM
Attachments: image001.png
2024.05.23 LTR to Malibu Planning Director Opposing ACDP 20-003(5369575.1).pdf Good Morning,
Please see the attached courtesy copy of the correspondence from Mr. Ehrlich that was sent out yesterday, 5/23/24.
Thank you,
Nora M. Martin-Resnick
Assistant
[email protected]
Direct Dial: (310) 746-4455 | Main: (310) 746-4400 | Fax: (310) 746-4499 Elkins Kalt Weintraub Reuben Gartside LLP
10345 W. Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90064
www.elkinskalt.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be attorney-client privileged. Dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or attachments without proper authorization is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Elkins Kalt Weintraub Reuben Gartside LLP immediately by telephone or by e-mail, and permanently delete the original, and destroy all copies, of this message and all attachments.
317
ATTACHMENT 8
5368272.3
Kenneth A. Ehrlich
D: 310.746.4412
Direct Fax: 310.746.4462
[email protected]
Ref: 15651-0001
May 23, 2024
VIA E-MAIL AND FEDEX
Mr. Richard Mollica
Planning Director
City of Malibu Planning Department
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Malibu, CA 90265
E-Mail: [email protected]
Re: Administrative Coastal Development Permit No. 20-003 And Minor Modification No. 20-001
Dear Director Mollica:
Our office represents Brian and Pamela Adams, the owners (collectively, “Client”) of the real property located at Heathercliff Road, Malibu, California, also identified at APN No. .
Applicant Alan Hajjar, on behalf of ACS International LLC (collectively, “Applicant”), seeks to construct a new 4,050-square-foot, split-level, 18-foot tall, two-story single-family residence with an attached 390- square-foot garage, a swimming pool, landscaping, hardscape, retaining walls, grading, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system, and requests a minor modification for up to a 50 percent reduction of the front yard setback (“Project”). The Applicant seeks to construct the Project at 29329 Heathercliff Road, Malibu, California, also identified as APN No. 4468-011-011 (“Site”) We write to express our Client’s objections and concerns regarding the Project. Specifically, our Client objects to the Project and respectfully requests that the Planning Director deny Project approval on the following grounds:
1. The City Failed to Apply the Hillside and Ridgeline Development Standards, Which Preclude the Project. The Malibu Municipal Code (“MMC”) and the City of Malibu’s (the “City”) Local Implementation Plan (“LIP”) specify Hillside and Ridgeline Development Standards, and these standards apply to the proposed Project. The City failed to apply these standards during the Project review. As discussed below, the Project cannot comply with these standards. For these reasons alone, the Planning Director should not approve the Project.
2. No Basis Exists for the Front Yard Setback Modification. No proper basis exists for the Planning Director to approve the Applicant’s request for up to a 50 percent reduction of the front yard setback. No evidence suggests that the proposed setback reduction is necessary to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive resources, as the LIP requires. Instead, the Applicant seeks to reduce the setback solely to maximize the size of the Project footprint and single-family residence. Moreover, the Project depends on 318
Mr. Richard Mollica
Planning Director
City of Malibu Planning Department
May 23, 2024
5368272.3
the proposed significant reduction of the front setback, and the Applicant could not construct it without it.
The Planning Director should reject the Project.
3. CDP Variance Required. To the extent that the Project cannot comply with the LIP’s standards or requirements, it requires a variance. However, the Applicant has not sought any variance associated with the Project. The Planning Director should reject the Project for this reason as well.
I. The Project Fails To Comply With Applicable Ridgeline Development Standards A. LIP Hillside and Ridgeline Development Standards Apply to the Project LIP chapter 6 codifies the Scenic, Visual, And Hillside Resource Protection Ordinance. LIP section
6.2 provides that chapter 6 applies as follows:
All Coastal Development Permit Applications concerning any parcel of land that is located along, within, provides views to or is visible from any scenic area, scenic road, or public viewing area shall be governed by the policies, standards and provisions of this chapter in addition to any other policies or standards contained elsewhere in the certified LCP which may apply. The hillside development standards of this chapter shall apply to properties where the project site includes any area of slope over 20 percent.
Where applicable, Coastal Development Permits shall be conditioned to require compliance with any policy, standard or provision contained herein.
LIP § 6.2.
Here, Applicant-submitted Project documents reveal that the Project would be visible from a designated scenic road, Pacific Coast Highway. Specifically, an Applicant-submitted photo showing the view of the Site from Pacific Coast Highway, with a rendering of the Project buildings (“Project Rendering”), specifically shows visibility from PCH. We attach a true and correct copy of the Project Rendering as Exhibit A. The Project Rendering also demonstrate that the Project would be visible from Pacific Coast Highway, which the City’s LCP Land Use Plan (“LUP”) defines as a scenic road. LUP § 6.3 (“The following roads within the City are considered Scenic Roads: a. Pacific Coast Highway.”).
Consequently, LIP chapter 6 unambiguously applies to the Project.
Further, areas of slope over 20 percent characterize significant portions of the Site. See, e.g., Project Site Plan. Consequently, the LIP chapter 6 hillside development standards also apply to the Project. 319
Mr. Richard Mollica
Planning Director
City of Malibu Planning Department
May 23, 2024
5368272.3
LIP section 6.5(C) specifies hillside development standards and provides as follows:
1. Ridgelines
a. New development shall be sited and designed to prohibit construction of structures on a primary or secondary ridgeline. Any structures shall be located a minimum of 300 feet (measured horizontally) or 100 feet (measured vertically) from the top of a primary ridgeline, and shall maintain the roof or top of structure below a primary ridgeline when viewed from a public street or highway.
b. Where there are no feasible building site that can conform to the requirements of Section a, or where the only feasible building site would result in unavoidable adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat areas, then a variance may be approved for a building site that does not conform to these standards, with design measures that minimize the visual resource impacts. Any structures approved on such a building site shall be limited to one-story in height.
LIP § 6.5(C).
LIP section 2.1 defines Primary Ridgeline and Secondary Ridgeline as follows:
RIDGELINE, PRIMARY - a hill, ridge or promontory which drops on either side of the top of this landform feature, and includes at least one of the following conditions: 1) forms a distinct part of the skyline when viewed from a public street or highway; or, 2) is seen as a distinct and prominent edge against a backdrop of land at least 500 feet behind it when viewed from a public street and contains an average slope of at least 3:1.
RIDGELINE, SECONDARY - a hill, ridge, or promontory other than a primary ridgeline, but on which the elevation drops more than 10 feet in 100 feet horizontally on either side of the top of this landform feature.
LIP § 2.1
Here, the Site meets the criteria for a Primary Ridgeline since the Site forms a distinct part of the skyline when viewed from a public street. The Project rendering illustrates that the Site constitutes part of the skyline viewable from Pacific Coast Highway, a public road. See, e.g., Exhibit A. Further, even if the Site does not constitute a Primary Ridgeline, it undoubtedly meets the criteria for a Secondary Ridgeline. 320
Mr. Richard Mollica
Planning Director
City of Malibu Planning Department
May 23, 2024
5368272.3
In this regard, the Site is situated upon a hill where the elevation drops more than 10 feet in 100 feet horizontally on either side of the top of the landform feature. See, e.g., Project Site Plan. Consequently, LIP section 6.5(C)(1) ridgeline development standards apply to the Project regardless of whether the Site constitutes a Primary or Secondary Ridgeline.
B. MMC Ridgeline Development Standards Apply To The Project MMC section 17.40.040 outlines development standards applicable to all residential development and provides as follows regarding ridgeline development:
8. Ridgelines.
1. Primary Ridgelines.
a. A primary ridgeline shall be defined as follows: a hill, ridge or promontory which drops on either side of the top of this landform feature, and includes at least one of the following conditions:
i. Forms a distinct part of the skyline when viewed from a public street or highway; or
ii. Is seen as a distinct and prominent edge against a backdrop of land at least 500 feet behind it when viewed from a public street and contains an average slope of at least 3:1.
b. Structures shall be located a minimum of 100 feet (measured horizontally) from the top of a primary ridgeline, and shall maintain the roof or top of structure below a primary ridgeline when viewed from a public street or highway.
2. Secondary Ridgelines.
a. A secondary ridgeline is defined as hills, ridges, and promontories other than primary ridgelines, but on which the elevation drops more than 10 feet in 100 feet horizontally on either side of the top of this landform feature.
b. Any structures proposed on secondary ridgelines shall be subject to the planning director’s review. If the structure projects above the top of the secondary ridgeline, as viewed from a public or private street, the planning 321
Mr. Richard Mollica
Planning Director
City of Malibu Planning Department
May 23, 2024
5368272.3
director may impose conditions to minimize potential scenic impacts based on such factors as the prominence of the site and structure, the severity of visual impact to public view, and the existing development pattern in the surrounding area. These conditions would be based on the following secondary ridgeline development criteria:
i. Proposed structures are encouraged to be maintained at a low profile to mitigate visual impacts of the secondary ridgeline.
ii. The proposed design of the structure, including grading of the site should incorporate development techniques which sensitively conform to the natural terrain, including such measures as split level designs or second stores which are stepped back as viewed from the downhill side of the property, reduced building pads and roof pitches which parallel existing slopes.
MMC § 17.40.040.
Since the Project proposes a new single-family home for residential use in the Rural Residential zone, it constitutes residential development subject to MMC section 17.40.040. For the same reasons discussed in Section I. A. above, the Site constitutes either a Primary Ridgeline or a Secondary Ridgeline.
Consequently, the MMC section 17.40.040 ridgeline development standards apply to the Project regardless of whether the Site constitutes a Primary Ridgeline or Secondary Ridgeline.
C. The City Failed to Apply Applicable Ridgeline Development Standards As discussed above, the LIP and MMC's ridgeline development standards unambiguously apply to the Project. However, the City failed to apply these ridgeline standards during its review of the Project. See, e.g., email correspondence between City staff and the Applicant attached as Exhibit B. Consequently, the Project received no City review for compliance with applicable ridgeline development standards, and the City failed to conduct the analysis and reach the findings required to approve a CDP application subject to LIP chapter 6.
LIP section 6.4 provides that the City must conduct an analysis and reach certain findings which address the specific project impacts relative to the applicable development standards identified in Section
6.5 of the Malibu LIP. Moreover, a Coastal Development Permit for proposed development subject to LIP chapter 6 may only be granted if the City makes certain findings specified in LIP section 6.4.
Here, correspondence between City staff and the Applicant unequivocally shows that the City failed to apply the ridgeline development standards during its review of the Project. See Exhibit B. Although the 322
Mr. Richard Mollica
Planning Director
City of Malibu Planning Department
May 23, 2024
5368272.3
City acknowledges that the ridgeline development standards arguably apply to the Project, the City, nevertheless, decided that it would “argue that the ridgeline standards do not apply.” Id. The City's claimed grounds for its decision not to apply ridgeline standards to the Project were that “[t]he Code is ambiguous, but staff believes that it would not meet the intent of the code to apply the ridgeline standards in this already developed area of the city.” Id. In other words, City staff unilaterally determined not to apply the ridgeline development standards in developed areas of the City.
This make no practical or legal sense. Nothing in the LIP or MMC specify that these standards only apply in “undeveloped” areas of Malibu or do not apply to "developed" areas of the City. Clearly, the City must analyze this Project under the ridgeline development standards. By failing to conduct the required analysis, the City violated the law by failing to make any of the findings required by LIP section 6.4.
Since the City failed to conduct the required analysis of the Project’s compliance with applicable ridgeline standards, let alone reach the necessary findings, the Planning Director should deny the Project.
D. The Project Cannot Comply With Applicable Ridgeline Standards The Project cannot comply with the applicable ridgeline standards.
For example, the LIP and MMC require that new development on a Primary Ridgeline “shall maintain the roof or top of structure below a primary ridgeline when viewed from a public street or highway.” LIP § 6.5(C)(1)(a); MMC § 17.40.040(A)(8)(1)(b). Here, the Project Rendering clearly shows that the Project’s roof and a significant portion of the building would be visible from Pacific Coast Highway. See Exhibit B. Additionally, other aspects of the Project fail to comply with applicable ridgeline standards without an appropriate variance, which Applicant has not sought here. For example, structures must be located a minimum of 300 feet (measured horizontally) or 100 feet (measured vertically) from the tope of a primary ridgeline. LIP § 6.5(C)(1)(a). Accordingly, the Project cannot comply with the applicable ridgeline development standards. Should Applicant wish to avoid these standards, it must apply for a variance. It has not done so.
Since the Project cannot comply with the applicable ridgeline development standards, the Planning Director must deny the Project.
II. No Proper Basis Exists For Approval Of A Front Yard Setback Reduction A. Applicant Failed To Provide A Proper Justification For The Requested Front Setback Reduction
LIP section 3.6(F) specifies setback requirements applicable to the Property. Based on the 323
Mr. Richard Mollica
Planning Director
City of Malibu Planning Department
May 23, 2024
5368272.3
dimensions of the Site, the front setback for the Project would be 59.2 feet. Here, the Applicant requests approval of a front setback reduction by up to 50% -- for a front setback of 29.6 feet.
Additionally, LIP section 3.6(F)(5) provides that “[M]odifications to required yards/setbacks standards shall be permitted where necessary to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive resources.” Here, neither the Applicant's submitted documents nor City staff analysis reference any sensitive resources. Instead, the Applicant attempts to justify the front yard setback reduction by asserting that reducing the front setback is necessary “to be able to build this project on the area of the site where the slope is less than 4 to 1.” See true and correct copy of the Applicant’s January 6, 2020 letter to City staff, attached as Exhibit C.
The Applicant’s justification does not constitute a proper basis for approving the requested front setback reduction. The LIP provides that the only adequate basis for the Planning Director to approve a front setback reduction is “to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive resources.” LIP section 3.6(F)(5).
Here, the Applicant fails to even make the bare assertion that the requested front setback reduction is necessary to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive resources, let alone provide any evidence in support.
Instead, the Applicant reveals that his sole reason for requesting the front setback reduction is that he wants to build the Project significantly larger than it could be if he complied with the applicable setback requirements. Further, the Applicant’s justification implies that he seeks to avoid site plan approval requirements that would be triggered if the proposed Project complied with setback requirements and built portions of the Project.
Moreover, no known or apparent sensitive resources exist in the portion of the Site subject to the front setback requirements. Granting the Applicant’s requested front setback reduction would do nothing to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive resources, and would ignore applicable law. Consequently, no proper basis exists for granting the requested front setback reduction, let alone any front setback reduction whatsoever. If the applicants want to reduce the front yard setback, it should apply for a variance. It has not done so.
B. The Planning Director Cannot Make The Necessary Findings Even if Applicant properly justified the requested setback reduction, which he cannot, the Planning Director cannot make the findings necessary to approve a setback reduction for the Project.
LIP section 13.27.1(B) provides that the Planning Director may grant minor modification permits authorizing the reduction of front setbacks by no more than 50%. In approving such front setback reduction, LIP section 13.27.5(B) provides that the Planning Director must make findings that the proposal meets all of the following: (1) that the project is consistent with the policies of the Malibu LCP; (2) that the project does not adversely affect neighborhood character; (3) the proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of state and local law. LIP § 13.27.5(B) (emphasis added). 324
Mr. Richard Mollica
Planning Director
City of Malibu Planning Department
May 23, 2024
5368272.3
As discussed above, the Project does not comply with the hillside and ridgeline development standards contained in the LIP. Consequently, the Planning Director cannot find that the Project is consistent with the policies of the LCP. Further, the Project’s proposed front setback reduction would drastically affect the neighborhood’s character. For example, the Project would be extremely close to the existing homes and the only home on the hillside between the existing homes and Pacific Coast Highway.
Therefore, the Planning Director cannot find that the Project does not adversely affect the neighborhood's character. Moreover, as discussed above, the Planning Director cannot find that the Project complies with the applicable ridgeline standards and, therefore, the Project cannot comply with all applicable state and local law requirements.
Since the Planning Director cannot make any of the findings required to approve the Applicant’s requested front setback reduction, let alone all of them, the Planning Director should not grant the requested setback reduction. Since the Applicant cannot construct the Project as proposed without the requested front setback reduction, the Planning Director must deny the Project.
III. Conclusion
For the reasons discussed above, our Client respectfully requests that the Planning Director deny the Project.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH A. EHRLICH,
JUSTIN R. TRUJILLO
Elkins Kalt Weintraub Reuben Gartside LLP
KAE:jrt
Attachments: Exhibit A (Project Rendering); Exhibit B (Email Correspondence); Exhibit C (Discretionary Request Letter)
cc: John G. Mazza (via email only)
325
EXHIBIT A
326
327
EXHIBIT B
328
1 Lilly Rudolph
From: Lilly Rudolph
Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 10:55 AM
To: David Kellen
Cc: Alan ACS
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff review
Attachments: LCP_MMC Story Pole Policy.pdf
Hi David and Alan,
Good news. We are going to argue that the ridgeline standards do not apply. The Code is ambiguous, but staff believes that it would not meet the intent of the code to apply the ridgeline standards in this already developed area of the city.
The next step is to submit a story pole plan per the City's story pole plan policy (attached) I located an approval from Public Works. The Water District referral is outstanding.
The Notice of application for a CDP (green sign) would need to be posted and documented.
Thank you,
Lilly
Lilly Rudolph, Contract Planner
[email protected]
From: David Kellen < >
Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 8:40 AM
To: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Cc: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff review
Hi:
I looked over the definitions and do feel that 1) our project is definitely not a Primary Ridgeline and 2) that our project should not be considered a Secondary Ridgeline.
Also, we have been working on this project for well over two years and at no time has any of the Planning Staff brought this up.
We would like to know that we have full support from the Planning Department for the project as it has been submitted.
I feels things are dragging as just when we have provided what we are asked for, something new seems to show up. This has happened more than once. We feel that if something new is being required for developments, we should only be required to provide what we were told at are early Planning Department meetings.
329
2 If this ridge line going to present any impact on our project Alan and I would like a meeting with you and a supervisor do discuss this. Also, Maybe a supervisor should talk to the Planning Commission to discuss this situation.
Both Alan and I have completed our COVID vaccinations and would be willing to meet with masks. Or a Zoom meeting would be acceptable.
Thanks,
David Kellen
From: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 12:10 PM
To: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Cc: David Kellen < >
Subject: RE: 29329 Heathercliff review
Hi Lilly
This project should be treated as in progress and Not new project as we been on it for 2 years now Hopefull that the new ridgeline rules does not affect our design Please let us know after talking to planning staff
Alan Hajjar, MSCE
www.myacsinc.com
<image001.png>
USA:
1666 1/2 Mc Cadden Pl
Hollywood, CA 90028
Tel: (818) 383-1800
Fax: (323) 463-0485
From: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 11:34 AM
To: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff review
Hi Alan,
The revised plans address all my previous comments. I need to run a question by Planning staff regarding development on ridgelines and will follow up. Ridgeline standards have typically not been implemented by Planning staff over the years, and Planning Commissioners recently informed staff that moving forward, they will review projects to conform with ridgeline standards. The MMC and LIP have two different set of requirements. The City's policy is to apply the most restrictive of the two when the LIP and MMC conflict. I'm pasting the ridgeline language for your reference.
LIP Section 2.1
RIDGELINE, PRIMARY - a hill, ridge or promontory which drops on either side of the top of this landform feature, and includes at least one of the following conditions: (1) forms a distinct part of the 330
3 skyline when viewed from a public street or highway; or (2) is seen as a distinct and prominent edge against a backdrop of land at least five hundred feet (500′) behind it when viewed from a public street and contains an average slope of at least 3:1.
RIDGELINE, SECONDARY - a hill, ridge, or promontory other than a primary ridgeline, but on which the elevation drops more than ten feet (10′) in one hundred feet (100′) horizontally on either side of the top of this landform feature.
Standards:
LIP Section 6.5 (C)
1. Ridgelines
a. New development shall be sited and designed to prohibit construction of structures on a primary or secondary ridgeline. Any structures shall be located a minimum of 300 feet (measured horizontally) or 100 feet (measured vertically) from the top of a primary ridgeline, and shall maintain the roof or top of structure below a primary ridgeline when viewed from a public street or highway.
b. Where there are no feasible building site that can conform to the requirements of Section a, or where the only feasible building site would result in unavoidable adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat areas, then a variance may be approved for a building site that does not conform to these standards, with design measures that minimize the visual resource impacts. Any structures approved on such a building site shall be limited to one-story in height.
MMC Section 17.40.040
8. Ridgelines.
1. Primary Ridgelines.
a. A primary ridgeline shall be defined as follows: a hill, ridge or promontory which drops on either side of the top of this landform feature, and includes at least one of the following conditions:
i. Forms a distinct part of the skyline when viewed from a public street or highway; or ii. Is seen as a distinct and prominent edge against a backdrop of land at least five hundred (500) feet behind it when viewed from a public street and contains an average slope of at least 3:1. b. Structures shall be located a minimum of one hundred (100) feet (measured horizontally) from the top of a primary ridgeline, and shall maintain the roof or top of structure below a primary ridgeline when viewed from a public street or highway.
2. Secondary Ridgelines.
a. A secondary ridgeline is defined as hills, ridges, and promontories other than primary ridgelines, but on which the elevation drops more than ten (10) feet in one hundred (100) feet horizontally on either side of the top of this landform feature.
b. Any structures proposed on secondary ridgelines shall be subject to the planning director’s review. If the structure projects above the top of the secondary ridgeline, as viewed from a public or private street, the planning director may impose conditions to minimize potential scenic impacts based on such factors as the prominence of the site and structure, the severity of visual impact to public view, and 331
4 the existing development pattern in the surrounding area. These conditions would be based on the following secondary ridgeline development criteria:
i. Proposed structures are encouraged to be maintained at a low profile to mitigate visual impacts of the secondary ridgeline.
ii. The proposed design of the structure, including grading of the site should incorporate development techniques which sensitively conform to the natural terrain, including such measures as split level designs or second stores which are stepped back as viewed from the downhill side of the property, reduced building pads and roof pitches which parallel existing slopes.
3. Grading or berms which alter the natural contours of, or change the elevation of the crest of the ridgeline in order to create a pad shall be avoided.
4. Berms, contour or landform grading, and landscaping should be used, when necessary, to soften the visual impacts to secondary ridgelines created by structures and grading. c. Ridgetop development is particularly susceptible to wildfire hazard. In addition to the criteria to reduce visual impact, the planning director shall evaluate all ridgeline development on slopes of at least 3:1 to incorporate adequate setbacks to address potential fire hazard concerns.
Given that ridgeline applicability and standards are relatively unfamiliar to me, I will Planning staff to seek guidance and will follow up next week. I acknowledge that this is problematic given the multiple plan corrections thus far, but Planning staff is striving to ensure that projects are complete and conform with standards prior to a hearing to avoid further delays in the long run.
In addition, Public Works review and Water District review appears to be outstanding. Could you please submit review sheets for both agencies?
Thank you,
Lilly
Lilly Rudolph, Contract Planner
[email protected]
From: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 5:03 PM
To: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: 29329 Heathercliff review
Wow great
Thank you
Alan Hajjar, MSCE
www.myacsinc.com
<image001.png>
USA:
1666 1/2 Mc Cadden Pl
Hollywood, CA 90028
Tel: (818) 383-1800
Fax: (323) 463-0485
332
5 From: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 3:32 PM
To: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff review
Hi Alan,
I'm back and will follow up this week.
Thank you for your patience,
Lilly
Lilly Rudolph, Contract Planner
[email protected]
From: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 2:12 PM
To: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: 29329 Heathercliff review
Ok I guess I will wait till you return
Hopefully soon
Stay safe
Alan Hajjar, MSCE
www.myacsinc.com
<image001.png>
USA:
1666 1/2 Mc Cadden Pl
Hollywood, CA 90028
Tel: (818) 383-1800
Fax: (323) 463-0485
From: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 8:17 AM
To: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff review
Hi Alan,
Thank you for your voice message. Unfortunately, timing is unknown, but I hope to catch up as soon as I can. For now, I understand all Planning staff are very busy, and I don't think they would be able to make much progress by the time I return.
Thank you for your patience,
Lilly
Lilly Rudolph, Contract Planner
333
6 [email protected]
From: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 2:37 PM
To: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff review
Hi Lilly
Any update ?
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 18, 2021, at 8:47 AM, Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]> wrote:
I think I can get to it tomorrow, if not Monday.
Lilly Rudolph, Contract Planner
[email protected]
From: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:07 PM
To: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: 29329 Heathercliff review
Morning Lilly
Any chance you will review this week Please
Alan Hajjar, MSCE
www.myacsinc.com
<image001.png>
USA:
1666 1/2 Mc Cadden Pl
Hollywood, CA 90028
Tel: (818) 383-1800
Fax: (323) 463-0485
From: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 6:46 PM
To: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff review
I understand, Alan. I have few projects ahead of you that I need to review. But I hope all the issues have been resolved and we can move forward from here. 334
7 Lilly Rudolph, Contract Planner
[email protected]
From: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 2:54 PM
To: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: 29329 Heathercliff review
Hi Lilly
I know you busy , I really need you help in reviewing so we can move forward Alan Hajjar, MSCE
www.myacsinc.com
<image001.png>
USA:
1666 1/2 Mc Cadden Pl
Hollywood, CA 90028
Tel: (818) 383-1800
Fax: (323) 463-0485
From: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 8:48 AM
To: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff review
Yes, will do, Alan. Thank you for the corrections.
Lilly Rudolph, Contract Planner
[email protected]
From: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 8:20 PM
To: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: 29329 Heathercliff review
Hi Lilly
Can you pleas please review and finalize , I did overlay all plans ( arch , civil and topo ) and they all correct
I really appreciate if you review so we move forward.
Thank you in advance
Alan Hajjar, MSCE
www.myacsinc.com
<image001.png>
335
8 USA:
1666 1/2 Mc Cadden Pl
Hollywood, CA 90028
Tel: (818) 383-1800
Fax: (323) 463-0485
From: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 10:18 AM
To: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 29329 Heathercliff review
Hi Alan,
Yes, I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. I received your email and attachments.
Lilly Rudolph, Contract Planner
[email protected]
From: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 7:22 AM
To: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: 29329 Heathercliff review
Morning Lilly
Can you please confirm that you received the below and attached Alan Hajjar, MSCE
www.myacsinc.com
<image001.png>
USA:
1666 1/2 Mc Cadden Pl
Hollywood, CA 90028
Tel: (818) 383-1800
Fax: (323) 463-0485
From: Alan ACS <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2021 6:50 AM
To: 'Lilly Rudolph' <[email protected]>; 'David Kellen' >
Subject: RE: 29329 Heathercliff review
Morning Lilly
I am sorry about these inconsistency between civil and Arch David Kellen ( architect ) met with Civil and they adjusted all their plans to match and we overlayed all plans and they match now ,
Attached are :
Full set of architecture
336
9 Full set of civil
Earth work
Answers to your corrections
Topo with slope analysis and final site plan on it
Can you please review and Appreciate if we can get on a conf call via GoToMeeting if you still have any concern
Below is a link to download also in case files are too big to receive via email https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5bmy18ohgd5ap3d/AA
Have a good weekend
Alan Hajjar, MSCE
www.myacsinc.com
<image001.png>
USA:
1666 1/2 Mc Cadden Pl
Hollywood, CA 90028
Tel: (818) 383-1800
Fax: (323) 463-0485
From: Lilly Rudolph <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 4:17 PM
To: Alan ACS <[email protected]>; David Kellen < >
Subject: 29329 Heathercliff review
Hi Alan and David,
It appears that the same issue remains with an inconsistency between the architectural plan and civil plan and fire access plan. Please see the attached exhibits for clarification.
New grading has been added to the civil plan that appears to be on steep slopes.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Lilly
Lilly Rudolph, AICP
Contract Planner
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Malibu CA 90265
[email protected]
337
EXHIBIT C
338
DAVID KELLEN + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2701 AIRPORT AVENUE – 202
SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
310 245 3584
e-mail: [email protected]
www: davidkellenassociates.com
January 6, 2020
To Whom It May Concern:
Regarding 29329 Heathercliff Road, Malibu, CA, 90265:
A modification is requested for the front yard set back. The front yard set back is 20% of 297 feet (the depth of the lot), which equals 59.2 feet. The request is to reduce the front yard setback from 59.2 feet to 29.6 feet (50% of 59.2 feet). The justification is that to be able to build this project on the area of the site where the slope is less than 4 to 1, the reduction of the front yard is necessary.
A modification is requested for allowing 575 square feet of the roof (14%) to be greater than the allowable 18 feet above grade but less than 24 feet above grade. The justification is, that on this sloped lot, this minimal amount of height would reduce the amount of grading and dirt removal from the site.
Thank you for your consideration.
David Kellen, Architect
11/21
339
5480420
Kenneth A. Ehrlich
D: 310.746.4412
Direct Fax: 310.746.4462
[email protected]
Ref: 15651-0001
October 4, 2024
City of Malibu Planning Commission
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Malibu, CA 90265
E-Mail: [email protected]
Maureen Tamuri
Interim Planning Director
City of Malibu Planning Department
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Malibu, CA 90265
E-Mail: [email protected]
Re: Coastal Development Permit No. 20-003 And Minor Modification No. 20- 001
Dear Chair Leonard and Members of the Planning Commission:
On behalf of our clients, Brian and Pamela Adams, we supplement our previous letter dated May 23, 2024 (attached for convenience at Exh. “1”), opposing the proposed project of Applicant Alan Hajjar, on behalf of ACS International LLC’s (collectively, “Applicant”) at 29329 Heathercliff Road, Malibu, California, also identified as APN No. 4468-011-011 (“Project”). In addition to the points addressed in our May 23, 2024 letter, the Adams object to the Project because it entails illegal grading and encroaches on the Adams’ property.
I. Illegal Unpermitted Grading Work
Nearly immediately after the Project was calendared for hearing, a concerned neighbor informed our office of disturbing and illegal grading activity at the Project. Specifically, on September 26, 2024, we understand that a neighbor observed and documented workers utilizing a bobcat vehicle, dump truck, and other equipment to conduct grading work at the Project site.
Additionally, we understand that the Applicant made blatant misrepresentations to the City of Malibu (“City”), stating this illegal grading constituted “fire prevention and weed clearance”, without obtaining any required grading permits or approvals. Despite Applicant’s mischaracterization of the work, the work actually resulted in significant and clearly observable changes to the existing Project existing slopes. Consequently, Applicant’s unpermitted grading work violates LIP § 8.2 (grading requires permit from City).
Applicant apparently conducted this illegal unpermitted grading work prior to a City staff inspection and/or an inspection by Planning Commissioners in an effort to decrease the grades of slopes steeper than 4 to 1; slopes of 4:1 or greater could jeopardize Project approval. Therefore, 340
EXHIBIT E
City of Malibu Planning Commission
October 4, 2024
5480420
not only did Applicant conduct illegal grading in violation of the LCP, but it also sought to influence City staff’s opinion and improve the likelihood of Project approval.
The Planning Commission cannot condone or reward Applicant’s illegal conduct. Because of the unpermitted grading work, the Planning cannot find the Project is consistent with the LCP or complies with all applicable laws and should deny the Project for these reasons alone. Rather, the Planning Commission should request City Code Enforcement to conduct a full investigation of the illegal grading work.
II. Title Dispute
Applicant seeks to utilize a portion of the northwestern corner of the Adams’ property commonly known as 29327 Heathercliff, Malibu, California, also identified at APN No. 4468- 011-012 (“Adams Property”) as the construction location for certain components of the Project, including a fire turnaround. See, Exh. “2”, Project Fire Access Exhibit. However, as discussed below, Applicant failed to come forward with any documentation of its purported legal right (whether in easement or otherwise) to utilize that corner of the Adams Property. As such, in addition to the reasons expressed in our May 23, 2024 letter and discussed above, the Planning Commission should reject the Project unless and until the Applicant can demonstrate a right to use the Adams’ property.
Materials submitted by the Applicant to the City of Malibu (“City”) in connection with the Project show certain portions of the proposed development, including a fire department turnaround area, which encroach over the boundary line and onto the northwestern corner of the Adams Property (the “Proposed Encroachments”). Additionally, an April 4, 2024 email correspondence from City contract planner Allison Cook to the Adams also indicates that Applicant seeks to move a portion of the existing boundary fence enclosing the Adams Property to accommodate the Proposed Encroachments. The Staff Report admits that City staff observed the Adams’ fence and vegetation lie within the Easement. See Staff Report, pp. 8- 9. We attach true and correct copies of the Project Fire Access Exhibit showing the Proposed Encroachments as Exhibit 2 and the email as Exhibit 3.
The Adams do not consent to the construction of the Proposed Encroachments and have not granted permission to use the northwestern corner of the Adams Property in any way. Further, the Adams have not consented to any entry onto the Adams Property and have not granted permission to move their existing fence or alter any existing improvements on the Adams Property in any way. Moreover, to our knowledge, no such consent or permission was ever granted by the 341
City of Malibu Planning Commission
October 4, 2024
5480420
Adams’ predecessor(s)-in-interest as the County Registrar-Recorders’ Office contains no such records.
If built, these improvements would give rise to trespass and private nuisance claims, among others. More importantly, the City has no authority to grant entitlements for development on property which the applicant neither owns nor has rights to use. Among other issues, LIP § 13.6.2 requires that “applicants must prove that they own the property which is the subject of the application or provide the City with written consent from the owner for the proposed development for the City to file the application.” LIP § 13.6.2(A). Where the applicant is not the owner of a fee interest in the property on which a proposed development is to be located, then they must “demonstrate a legal right, interest, or other entitlement to use the property for the proposed development.” LIP § 13.6.2(C). The municipal code similarly states that “applicants must prove that they own the property which is the subject of the application or provide the city with written consent from the owner for the city to process the application.” MMC § 17.04.150. No such permission, legal right, interest, or other entitlement has been demonstrated here.
Based on Applicant’s assertions in his April 4, 2024 email to City contract planner Allison Cook, we understand that Applicant claims easement rights purportedly allowing for the Proposed Encroachments. See Exhibit 2. However, we are not aware of any recorded instruments in the Adams Property’s chain of title that provide Applicant with these purported easement rights. Since the applicant requested processing the Project as a CDP on June 3, 2024, the Adams have been working with Stewart Title Company to investigate this title dispute and, if necessary, assert appropriate legal claims against the Applicant. Stewart Title Company’s investigation remains pending.
Because Applicant apparently has no apparent legal rights to utilize the Adams Property for the Encroaching Improvements, Applicant should bear the burden of proving otherwise. Any such evidence should be immediately provided to the Adams, and the Planning Commission should not approve the Project unless and until the Applicant can demonstrate valid legal rights to utilize the Adams Property for the Proposed Encroachments.
III. The Project is Ineligible for a Front Yard Setback Reduction After reviewing the September 26, 2024 Staff Report for this matter (“Staff Report”), the proposed resolution, and the relevant provisions of the Malibu Local Coastal Program (“LCP”), Local Implementation Plan (“LIP”), and Land Use Plan (“LUP”), the justification for granting Minor Modification (“MM”) No. 20-001 is legally and factually flawed. Written evidence cannot support the findings presented in the proposed resolution. Moreover, even if the Applicant could 342
City of Malibu Planning Commission
October 4, 2024
5480420
properly justify the requested setback reduction, which it cannot, the Planning Director cannot make the findings necessary to approve this setback reduction for the Project. For the reasons outlined below, the approval of the MM is critical to all other findings and the broader approval of Coastal Development Permit (“CDP”) No. 20-003. Without a valid basis for granting the MM, the Planning Commission cannot approve the CDP.
A. The Minor Modification Constitutes the Critical Analytical Element, and the Planning Commission Should Deny the Requested Modifications The requested MM, which would reduce the front yard setback by nearly 50%, forms the foundation for much of the Staff Report’s analysis and findings. City staff argue that this setback reduction is necessary to avoid purported “sensitive resources” on the Project site, specifically slopes steeper than 4 to 1. See Staff Report, pp. 5-6. However, as outlined below, City staff’s classification of these slopes as sensitive resources is incorrect and unsupported by the LIP or LUP.
Without legitimate grounds to approve the MM, the Planning Commission cannot approve the overall CDP in its current form, as it hinges on the front yard setback reduction.
B. Steep Slopes Do Not Constitute Sensitive Resources
Staff justifies the MM on the claimed basis that the setback reduction is necessary to avoid development on slopes steeper than 4 to 1, which City staff incorrectly classifies as “sensitive resources” under LIP § 3.6(F)(5). The LCP fails to support this analysis. The term “sensitive resources,” as used in the LIP, is not explicitly defined to include steep slopes. See LIP § 2.1.
Instead, it refers to specific environmental or habitat-related features, such as Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (“ESHA”), not steep slopes without noteworthy environmental features.
See LIP §§ 4.2, 4.3. No ESHA or other protected natural resources are located on or adjacent to the site, as confirmed by the City’s ESHA maps. Staff Report, p. 9. Consequently, the steep slopes on the Project site cannot qualify as sensitive resources under LIP § 3.6(F)(5) and, therefore, cannot serve as the basis for the MM.
C. Misapplication of LUP Policy 3.35
The Staff Report cites LUP Policy 3.35, which City staff purports to prevent encroachment on slopes of 25% grade or steeper, to justify the MM. Staff Report, p. 5. However, this policy exists within the context of protecting stream habitats and applies only where such resources are present. In other words, streams are the sensitive resource. See LUP Policy 3.35. In this case, there are no streams or riparian habitats on the Project site, neighboring properties, or in the vicinity, as 343
City of Malibu Planning Commission
October 4, 2024