Town Council Agenda
Wednesday, June 15, 2022, 3:00 p.m.
437 Old Mammoth Road, Suite Z, Mammoth Lakes
Members of the Town Council:
Mayor Lynda Salcido, Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Bill Sauser, Councilmember Kirk Stapp
NOTE: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Town Clerk at (760) 965-3602. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (28 CFR 13.102-35.104 ADA Title II)
NOTE: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Town Offices located at 437 Old Mammoth Road, Suite 230 during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the Town of Mammoth Lakes website at www.townofmammothlakes.ca.gov subject to staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.
NOTE: All comments will be limited to a speaking time of five minutes.
NOTE: This meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of Assembly Bill 361 which amends certain requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. While Suite Z is still open to the public, it is strongly encouraged that you watch the Town Council meetings on the Town of Mammoth Lakes' website at www.townofmammothlakes.ca.gov , on the local government cable channel 18, or via Zoom. Public comments can be submitted to the Town Clerk at [email protected]. before and during the meeting.
ZOOM INFORMATION
Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone, or Android device:
Please type in or cut and paste in this URL to join. https://monocounty.zoom.us/s/92958002088 Or join by phone:
Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 646 876 9923
Webinar ID: 929 5800 2088
International numbers available: https://monocounty.zoom.us/u/acobwlnMsm Public comments can also be given through Zoom by logging in or dialing in and raising your hand.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
The Public Comment portion of the agenda provides the public with an opportunity to address the Town Council on matters not otherwise listed on the agenda. Under California law the Town Council is prohibited from generally discussing or taking action on items not included in the agenda; however, the Town Council may briefly respond to comments or questions from members of the public. Therefore, the Town Council will listen to all public comment, but will not generally discuss the matter or take action on it. Requests for service from the Town may also be made at the Town offices during regular business hours.
Members of the public desiring to speak on a matter appearing on the agenda should ask the Mayor for the opportunity to be heard when the item comes up for Council consideration.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Opportunity to add urgency items pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)2, if necessary.
5. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND/OR DEPARTMENTS (AS NEEDED)
6. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
6.1. Introduce new Outdoor Recreation Manager Lawson Reif.
7. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
7.1. Presentation by Mammoth Lakes Chamber of Commerce on FY21-22 Work Program and Work Plan for FY22-23. (20 Minute Presentation)
8. CONSENT AGENDA
8.1. Approve the minutes of the regular meeting of June 1, 2022.
8.2. Approve the resolution re-authorizing the Town Council to meet virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic declared emergency.
8.3. Adopt the resolution approving the Mammoth Lakes Recreation Measure U Programming Funding Recommendations.
8.4. Approve and adopt the resolution establishing a reclassification of specified full-time, permanent General Employees’ Association (GEA) and Public Works Employees’ Association (PWEA) positions.
8.5. Adopt the resolution authorizing temporary closure of certain Town roads for the annual Fourth of July Parade and Freedom Mile run on July 4, 2022.
8.6. Accept Payment Approval Report No. 22-49 in the amount of $173,168.36.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Will not begin before 4:00 p.m.
Public Hearing Procedure.
The Mayor will open the public hearing and then: Statement and presentation by staff.
Statement and presentation by property owner or appellant. Questions from the Town Council. Call for testimony. Rebuttal to previous testimony by property owner or appellant.
Close the public hearing, terminating public testimony. The Town Council will deliberate the matter and arrive at a decision.
9.1. Public Hearing to consider three appeals of the May 11, 2022 Planning and Economic Development Commission Decision to Approve the Limelight Hotel Project (Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 22-002, Use Permit (UPA) 22-001, and Design Review (DR) 22-001).
9.2. Approval of Appropriations Limit, Investment Policy, and Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 22-23.
9.3. Town of Mammoth Lakes FY22-23 Master Fee Schedule Update.
10. POLICY MATTERS
10.1. Mammoth Lakes Tourism – Contract Updates, Deliverables, and Compensation for FY22-23. (Continued from the meeting of June 1, 2022.
10.2. Mammoth Lakes Tourism FY22-23 Operating Budget. (Continued from the meeting of June 1, 2022.)
11. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Informational reports from Councilmember representatives on committees, commissions, and organizations; general reports on Councilmember activities
12. CLOSED SESSION
12.1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6.(a), Conference with Labor Negotiators, the Council will meet with its representatives, Town Manager Daniel C.
Holler, Administrative Services/Finance Director Rob Patterson, and HR Manager Amanda Pelham
with respect to the following Employee Organizations: Mammoth Lakes Police Officers Association and the Mammoth Lakes Sergeants Association.
13. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ACTION TAKEN AFTER CLOSED SESSION
14. ADJOURNMENT
The Town Council will adjourn to a regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, July 6, 2022 at 4:00 p.m.
Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
1 Title: Presentation by Mammoth Lakes Chamber of Commerce on FY21-22 Work Program and Work Plan for FY22-23.
Council Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Prepared by: Daniel C. Holler, Town Manager
Recommended Motion: Council to provide comments as appropriate on Chamber Work Program.
Summary:
The Mammoth Lakes Chamber of Commerce provides business support and educational services and housing program support under an agreement with the Town. The Chamber provides periodic updates to the Council on their work efforts. This presentation will provide an overview of their achievements and areas work for FY21-22. Information will be provided on looking forward to their work program for FY22-23. This is an opportunity for the Chamber and Town Council to review expectations and areas of work provided for in the agreement. The Chamber agreement extends through 2025 and has a fixed level of support of $300,000 per year.
The work program provided for in the agreement includes:
MAMMOTH LAKES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BUSINESS SUPPORT,
DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC VITALITY PROGRAM
The Mammoth Lakes Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) implements a number of programs and provides services including education, relationships & connections, economic vitality, partnerships, business exposure, advocacy and member benefits. The top priorities are the members, a healthy business community and being the voice of business – not just the eyes and ears as the Chamber strives to represent the interest expressed by the Members. The overall work program of the Chamber includes a number of other community-based programs and events that enhance business to business communication, community engagement, promotions, and working in partnership with other entities to enhance the overall local business environment. The Chamber also supports businesses through the Employer Assisted Housing (EAH) program. The EAH Program is designed to match local employees, who are vetted through the Chamber process, with housing alternatives, including coordination with employers and outreach to owners to locate housing options. The EAH program as established by the Chamber will continue. The funding provided to the Chamber is designed to support the ongoing work program of the Chamber and the implementation of the deliverables provided below.
DELIVERABLES
1. Continue to provide overall management and support for Chamber services.
2. Provide regular opportunities for businesses to network and establish business to business relationships on at least a quarterly basis. This may be achieved through regular business after hour events, power lunches, and similar business focused events.
Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
2 3. Provide leadership to bring specific training to local businesses in such areas as marketing and promotion, use of social media, business plan development, financial planning, customer service, SBA loans, and similar services.
4. Provide at least two customer service-related training opportunities annually.
5. Provide community engagement opportunities through hosting innovative speakers, promotion of community events, putting on the 4th of July Parade, and opening celebrations (ribbon cuttings) for new businesses.
6. Serve as an advocate on local business matters before local governmental agencies (i.e., Town, County, Schools, and Special Districts) and establish and maintain a governmental affairs committee to assist the Chamber in making recommendations on governmental proposed policies and actions.
7. Establish regular outreach materials and methods to local businesses and other interested parties, which may include, but is not limited to electronic, social media and/or print media.
8. Provide support to the Town as requested to engage with area business owners on concerns raised by businesses such as capital projects directly impacting local businesses, sign programs/codes, beautification, and related actions or programs considered by the Town and/or requested by businesses.
9. Work cooperatively with Mammoth Lakes Tourism (MLT) on marketing, promotion and engagement with local businesses, events and activities that support the goals of MLT and enhancing visitation and visitor experiences.
10. Maintain database of candidate housing units and locations for Employer Assisted Housing (EAH) Program, including second homeowners, HOAs, short term rentals (STR) and other properties, hotels, RV and trailer parks, and other options. The effort continues the program established by the Chamber in FY19-20 and FY20-21.
11. Establish Employer Verification Program to ensure homeowners are renting to members of local workforce and deploy and maintain roommate matching app/website program including contracting with appropriate 3rd party vendor as necessary.
12. Provide formal updates (a minimum of two per year) to the Town Council on Chamber activities with one to outline the coming year’s work program.
13. Provide ongoing informal updates as appropriate to Town Council and Town Staff.
Town Council of Mammoth Lakes
Minutes of Regular Meeting
June 1, 2022, 5:00 p.m.
437 Old Mammoth Road, Suite Z, Mammoth Lakes
Members Present: Mayor Lynda Salcido, Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Bill Sauser,
Councilmember Kirk Stapp
_____________________________________________________________________
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 437 Old Mammoth Road, Suite Z, Mammoth Lakes.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Salcido led the flag salute.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Traci Walker, resident of Woodman Street, said that she was speaking on behalf of herself and her neighbors in opposition to the proposed Woodman bus turnaround.
Stacy Corless asked about the legality of a Suddenlink billboard truck parked and idling on Old Mammoth Road near the Snowcreek Driving Range.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Town Manager Daniel C. Holler reported that Agenda Items 10.4 and 10.5 would be continued to June 15, 2022.
Town Council Minutes
June 1, 2022
5. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND/OR DEPARTMENTS (AS NEEDED) Community and Economic Development Director Sandra Moberly responded to Ms. Corless' question from public comment. There was discussion among members of Council and staff. Ms. Moberly gave an update regarding current planning activities.
Public Works Director Haislip Hayes gave an update regarding current public works activities. There was discussion among members of Council and staff.
Deputy Airport Manager Sierra Shultz gave an update regarding funding and grant opportunities at the Airport. There was discussion among members of Council and staff.
Administrative Services/Finance Director Rob Patterson gave an update regarding the Town's evacuation response and capabilities. There was discussion among members of Council and staff.
6. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
6.1 Proclamation declaring June, 2022 as Elder Abuse Awareness Month.
Krista Cooper, Adult Services Supervisor for the Mono County Department of Social Services, spoke in support of the proclamation. There was discussion among members of Council and Ms. Cooper.
Mayor Salcido read the proposed proclamation.
Moved by Councilmember Bill Sauser
Seconded by Councilmember Kirk Stapp
Approve the proclamation declaring June, 2022 as Elder Abuse Awareness Month.
For (4): Mayor Lynda Salcido, Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth, Councilmember Bill Sauser, and Councilmember Kirk Stapp Absent (1): Councilmember Sarah Rea
Carried (4 to 0)
Town Council Minutes
June 1, 2022
6.2 Presentation by Mammoth Community Water District. (20 minute presentation)
Town Manager Daniel C. Holler introduced Garrett Higerd, Mammoth Community Water District District Engineer. Mr. Higerd gave a presentation regarding the Town's water resources. There was discussion among members of Council and Mr. Higerd.
Councilmember Rea joined the meeting at 5:50 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Christina Gray asked about the use of irrigation and landscaping on new projects. Mr. Higerd responded to Ms. Gray's question.
John Morris, Snowcreek Resort, said that the Water District was working with them on their watering plan.
7. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
7.1 Introduce newly promoted Associate Planner Michael Peterka.
Community and Economic Development Director Sandra Moberly introduced Mr. Peterka to the Council and the community.
7.2 Quarterly TOT Enforcement Update – Third Quarter Fiscal Year 21-22.
Administrative Services/Finance Director Rob Patterson outlined the information in the staff report. There was discussion among members of Council and staff.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
John Morris, Lodging Association, said that it was a great step but needed to be staffed properly. He suggested offering a way for managers or maintenance managers to get certified to do inspections. He said the fee was not a big deal.
Jason Herbst, Mammoth Five Star Lodging, asked questions. Mr.
Patterson responded.
The Mayor called a recess at 7:13 p.m. and the Council reconvened at 7:24 p.m.
Town Council Minutes
June 1, 2022
8. CONSENT AGENDA
Moved by Councilmember Bill Sauser
Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth
Approve the Consent Agenda.
For (5): Mayor Lynda Salcido, Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Bill Sauser, and Councilmember Kirk Stapp Carried (5 to 0)
8.1 Approve the minutes of the regular meeting of May 18, 2022.
8.2 Approve the minutes of the special meeting of May 25, 2022.
8.3 Approve the resolution re-authorizing the Town Council to meet virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic declared emergency.
8.4 Award the bid for publication of legal notices for fiscal year 2022-23 to The Sheet.
8.5 Adopt the Resolution Initiating the Proceedings to Levy Assessment, Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments within Assessment District 93-1 (Juniper Ridge) for Fiscal Year 2022/23, and Resolution Approving the Annual Report, and setting the time and place for the public hearing on July 6, 2022.
8.6 Adopt the Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments within Assessment District 93-4 (The Bluffs) Maintenance District No.1 for the Fiscal Year 2022/23, approving the Annual Report, and setting the time and place for the public hearing on July 6, 2022.
8.7 Adopt the Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments within the Benefit Assessment District 2002-01 (Old Mammoth Road) for the Fiscal Year 2022/23, approving Annual Report, and setting the time and place for the public hearing on July 6, 2022.
8.8 Adopt the Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments within Benefit Assessment District 2002-02 (North Village) for the Fiscal Year 2022/23, approving the Annual Report, and setting the time and place for the public hearing on July 6, 2022.
Town Council Minutes
June 1, 2022
8.9 Adopt Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments within Assessment District 2014-1 (Mammoth View) for the Fiscal Year 2022/23, approving the Annual Report, and setting the time and place for the public hearing on July 6, 2022.
8.10 Waive the reading and adopt by title only an Ordinance Adopting a Military Equipment Use Policy Pursuant to Government Code Section 7071 (AB 481).
8.11 Accept Payment Approval Report No. 22-47 in the amount of $1,173,944.51. Accept Payment Approval Report No. 22-48 in the amount of $173,168.36.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.1 Public hearing for the Community Development Block Grant 2022 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA).
The Mayor opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m.
Senior Planner - Housing Coordinator Nolan Bobroff outlined the information in the staff report. There was discussion among members of Council and staff.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Patricia Robertson, Executive Director of Mammoth lakes Housing, spoke in support of a request for an application to include housing programs including mortgage assistance.
The Mayor closed the public hearing at 7:36 p.m.
10. POLICY MATTERS
10.1 Approval of Services Agreement with Mammoth Lakes Trails and Public Access (MLTPA) for FY22-23.
Mayor Pro Tem Wentworth recused himself and left the meeting at 7:37 p.m. due to serving on the Mammoth Lakes Trails and Public Access (MLTPA) Board.
Town Manager Daniel C. Holler outlined the information in the staff report.
There was discussion among members of Council and staff.
Town Council Minutes
June 1, 2022
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Silver Chesak, MLTPA Board of Directors, spoke in support of the proposed agreement.
Mayor Pro Tem Wentworth returned to the meeting at 7:47 p.m.
Moved by Councilmember Bill Sauser
Seconded by Councilmember Kirk Stapp
Approve service agreement between MLTPA and the Town of Mammoth Lakes to provide support for the Mammoth Lakes Trails System work program and related services.
For (4): Mayor Lynda Salcido, Councilmember Sarah Rea,
Councilmember Bill Sauser, and Councilmember Kirk Stapp Absent (1): Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth
Carried (4 to 0)
10.2 Town Land Lease Agreement with the Mono County Library Authority for Building Located at 960 Forest Trail.
Town Manager Daniel C. Holler outlined the information in the staff report.
There was discussion among members of Council and staff.
Moved by Councilmember Bill Sauser
Seconded by Councilmember Sarah Rea
Approve the Land Lease Agreement for the Mono County Library Authority Building Located at 960 Forest Trail subject to final approval by the Authority and legal review.
For (5): Mayor Lynda Salcido, Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Bill Sauser, and Councilmember Kirk Stapp
Carried (5 to 0)
10.3 Agreement to allow the levy and collection of Solid Waste Parcel Fees in the Town of Mammoth Lakes for FY22-23.
Town Manager Daniel C. Holler outlined the information in the staff report.
There was discussion among members of Council and staff.
Town Council Minutes
June 1, 2022
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Sandy Hogan asked about the rent increase for the Library lease.
Justin Nadler, Mono County, offered to answer questions.
Mr. Holler responded to Ms. Hogan's questions.
Moved by Councilmember Bill Sauser
Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth
Approve the agreement between the Town and Mono County for the levy and collection of County Solid Waste Parcel Fees in the Town for FY22-
23. For (5): Mayor Lynda Salcido, Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Bill Sauser, and Councilmember Kirk Stapp
Carried (5 to 0)
10.4 Mammoth Lakes Tourism – Contract Updates, Deliverables, and Compensation for FY22-23.
This item was continued.
10.5 Mammoth Lakes Tourism FY22-23 Operating Budget.
This item was continued.
10.6 Award Architectural Design Service for the Town of Mammoth Lakes Civic Center.
Town Manager Daniel C. Holler outlined the information in the staff report.
There was discussion among members of Council and staff.
Moved by Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth
Seconded by Councilmember Bill Sauser
Finalize scope and fee negotiations and execute an agreement with the top ranked consultant for architectural and engineering design services for the Town of Mammoth Lakes Civic Center. Execute amendments to the contract to advance project development as authorized by the Town Council.
Town Council Minutes
June 1, 2022
For (5): Mayor Lynda Salcido, Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Bill Sauser, and Councilmember Kirk Stapp
Carried (5 to 0)
10.7 Authorize a professional services agreement with California Consulting Inc. for grant research and writing services.
Town Manager Daniel C. Holler and Community and Economic Development Director Sandra Moberly outlined the information in the staff report. There was discussion among members of Council and staff.
Moved by Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth
Seconded by Councilmember Bill Sauser
Authorize the professional services agreement with California Consulting, Inc., subject to the Town Attorney’s approval and finalization of the agreement, for grant research/writing services as described in the agreement which is included as Attachment A.
For (5): Mayor Lynda Salcido, Mayor Pro Tem John Wentworth, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Bill Sauser, and Councilmember Kirk Stapp
Carried (5 to 0)
11. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
Mayor Pro Tem Wentworth and Mayor Salcido attended the SNC Board meeting tour this afternoon.
Councilmember Sauser attended the Disc Golf Ribbon Cutting Ceremony and the Mammoth Lakes Tourism Board meeting.
Councilmember Stapp attended the Film Festival and reported on the Mammoth Lakes Housing wait list and Eastern Sierra Transit Authority (ESTA) ridership.
Town Manager Daniel C. Holler reported that the Lakes Basin was opened and that trolley service was available there.
Town Council Minutes
June 1, 2022
12. CLOSED SESSION
At 8:34 p.m. the Mayor announced that the Council would be entering into closed session for purposes as stated in the agenda.
12.1 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6.(a), Conference with Labor Negotiators, the Council will meet with its representatives, Town Manager Daniel C. Holler, Administrative Services/Finance Director Rob Patterson, and HR Manager Amanda Pelham with respect to the following Employee Organizations: Mammoth Lakes Police Officers Association and the Mammoth Lakes Sergeants Association.
12.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: (One case)
13. ANNOUNCEMENT OF ACTION TAKEN AFTER CLOSED SESSION
At 9:36 p.m. the Council reconvened from closed session and announced that there was no reportable action taken.
14. ADJOURNMENT
The Council adjourned the meeting at 9:36 p.m.
Jamie Gray, Town Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 22-
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
RE-AUTHORIZING THE TOWN COUNCIL TO MEET VIRUTALLY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC DECLARED EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, the Town of Mammoth Lakes supports transparency in government, and meetings of the Town Council and other legislative bodies of the Town are conducted in compliance with the Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et seq), so that members of the public may attend, observe, and participate; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54953(e) is a provision of the Brown Act establishing special rules that apply under specific circumstances to meetings of local government legislative bodies that are conducted remotely via teleconference; and
WHEREAS, using the special rules will facilitate continuing to conduct meetings remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council does hereby find that allowing for conducting public meetings virtually will support social distancing and reduces the potential risk to the public, elected officials and employees to be infected by or to spread COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, a required condition for the use of the Section 54953(e) rules is the existence of a state of emergency declared by the Governor pursuant to Government Code Section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions as described in Government Code Section 8558; and WHEREAS, an additional required condition is that state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, or that the legislative body meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees; and
WHEREAS, the Governor of California declared a Statewide state of emergency due to the COVID-19 virus on Wednesday, March 4; and
WHEREAS, on March 15, 2020 the Mono County Health Officer declared a local health emergency, including finding “that there is an imminent and proximate threat to public health from the introduction of COVID-19 in Mono County;” and WHEREAS, the Mono County Director of Public Health has recently issued a memorandum recommending that social distancing be used as one means of reducing the spread of COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2021, the Town Council adopted a resolution finding that pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(e), the legislative bodies of the
Resolution No. 22-
Town of Mammoth Lakes shall conduct their meetings without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Government Code Section 54953, as authorized by subdivision (e) of Section 54953, and that such legislative bodies shall comply with the requirements to provide the public with access to the meetings as prescribed in paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of Section 54953; WHEREAS, as a condition of extending the use of the provisions found in Section 54953(e), the Town Council must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency that exists in the Town of Mammoth Lakes, and the Town Council has done so; and
WHEREAS, emergency conditions continue to exist in the Town of Mammoth Lakes, as reflected by the ongoing state of emergency declared by the Governor; and
WHEREAS, requiring the meetings of the Town Council and other legislative bodies of the Town of Mammoth Lakes to be conducted entirely in person would create a risk to the health and safety of the members of the public who might attend, the members of the Town Council, Town staff, and other persons attending meetings; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Mammoth Lakes continues to comply with the requirements of Section 54953(e) to ensure public access to meetings of Town legislative bodies, including by providing notice and posting meeting agendas, allowing members of the public to access the meeting and provide comments via an Internet-based service option, and providing an opportunity for the public to address legislative bodies and offer comment in real time.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this resolution by this reference; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Mammoth Lakes hereby declares that a State and County emergency continues to exist due to the existence or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the Town of Mammoth Lakes due to the COVID-19 virus; and
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mono County Director of Public Health has issued a memorandum recommending the continued use of social distancing as a means to reduce the spread of COVID-19, and that the COVID-19 state of emergency impacts the ability of the Town Council to safely meet in person; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mammoth Lakes Town Council finds the use of virtual meetings, as provided for under AB 361 as approved by the State Legislature and signed by the Governor, continues to be a prudent and safe means to conduct the Town’s business respecting the recommendation to use social distancing as a precaution to reduce the spread of COVID-19; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town staff and legislative bodies are hereby authorized and directed to continue taking all actions necessary to carry out the
Resolution No. 22-
intent and purpose of this Resolution including conducting open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act; and
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) July 15, 2022, or such time the Town Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the legislative bodies of the Town of Mammoth Lakes may continue to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of section 54953.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th day of June 2022.
________________________________
LYNDA SALCIDO, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
JAMIE GRAY, Town Clerk
Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Adopt the resolution approving the Mammoth Lakes Recreation Measure U Programming Funding Recommendations.
Council Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Prepared by: Kim Anaclerio, Program Director, Mammoth Lakes Recreation Stuart Brown, Parks and Recreation Director
Recommended Motion: Adopt the Resolution Approving Measure U (Fund 217) Allocations for fiscal year 2021/22 Special Project funding and Programming funding recommendations for fiscal year 2022/23.
Summary: Mammoth Lakes Recreation (MLR) is a non-profit organization that is committed to preserving and enriching the quality of life for residents and visitors by ensuring the strategic use of Measure R and Measure U, including the acquisition of additional funding sources to develop and support recreation, arts and culture, mobility, capital projects and special projects in Mammoth Lakes. MLR is the recommending body for Measure R and Measure U and conducts the allocation process annually with funding recommendations presented to Town Council for review, and approval as recommended or with modification.
The stated broad objective of the funding process is as follows: “Measure R & U Funds will be recommended, or funds invested to create, implement and support a branded high-performance destination that includes a thriving arts & culture community and enhanced recreation opportunities.”
On May 3, 2022 the MLR Board of Directors approved recommendations for expenditures of Measure U Funds to be incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Town Budget. The detailed allocations are provided in the staff report and programming recommendations are incorporated in the proposed resolution.
Within the recommended MLR Board Measure U allocations are specific allocations for one special project totaling $3,800 and programming funds for nine local recreation, arts and culture organizations totaling $154,500.
This staff report and resolution seeks Town Council approval by resolution to allocate these special project and programming funds to the local arts and culture organizations.
Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Staff Report
Meeting Date: June 15, 2022
Prepared by: Kim Anaclerio, Program Director, Mammoth Lakes Recreation Stuart Brown, Parks and Recreation Director
Title: Mammoth Lakes Recreation Measure U Programming Funding Recommendations Agenda: Consent
Recommended Motion: Adopt the Resolution Approving Measure U (Fund 217) Allocations for fiscal year 2021/22 Special Project funding and Programming funding recommendations for fiscal year 2022/23.
Background
Mammoth Lakes Recreation (MLR) is a non-profit organization that is committed to preserving and enriching the quality of life for residents and visitors by ensuring the strategic use of Measure R and Measure U, including the acquisition of additional funding sources to develop and support recreation, arts and culture, mobility, capital projects and special projects in Mammoth Lakes.
MLR is the recommending body for Measure R and Measure U and conducts the allocation process annually with funding recommendations presented to Town Council for review, and approval as recommended or with modification.
The stated broad objective of the funding process is as follows: “Measure R & U Funds will be recommended, or funds invested to create, implement and support a branded high-performance destination that includes a thriving arts & culture community and enhanced recreation opportunities.”
On May 3, 2022 the MLR Board of Directors approved recommendations for expenditures of Measure U Funds to be incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Town Budget. The detailed allocations are provided in the staff report and programming recommendations are incorporated in the proposed resolution.
Within the recommended MLR Board Measure U allocations are specific allocations for one special project totaling $3,800 and programming funds for nine local recreation, arts and culture organizations totaling $154,500. This staff report and resolution seeks Town Council approval by resolution to allocate these special project and programming funds to the local arts and culture organizations.
Analysis
The recommendation for FY2022/23 includes both the total expenditure plan and then specific allocations for special projects and programming. The MLR Board recommended the following Measure U (Fund 217) Budget for FY2022/23 to be incorporated in the Town’s Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budget.
Measure U - Annual Expenses FY22-23
Programming $ 186,000.00
Office of Outdoor Recreation Manager $ 25,000.00
Office of Outdoor Recreation Coordinator $ 75,000.00
Special Projects $ 25,000.00
Transit Services $ 25,000.00
Events Contracts Processing $ 7,220.00
Equipment Replacement $ 2,000.00
Audit Services $ 4,250.00
Edison Hall Operations $ 15,000.00
MACC - Future Operations $ 300,000.00
Total Expenses $ 664,470.00
Net Revenue over Expenditures $ 215,530.00
Projected Fund Balance FY21-22 $ 2,650,000.00
MACC Capital Commitment $ (2,500,000.00)
Requested: MACC Concept Revision/Update $ (100,000.00)
Projected Uncommitted Fund Balance $ 50,000.00
Specific allocations for special projects or programming are determined through an extensive review process. The FY2022/23 Measure R & U Application Guide stated that the applications will be evaluated for alignment with the Broad Objective, Guiding Principles and Priority Elements of the MLR Strategic Plan. In addition, proposed allocations may not supplant previous existing or current Town projects, and are segmented into either programming, capital projects or special projects.
Programming/Special Project Funding Recommendations
The MLR Board as part of the allocation process makes funding recommendations for special projects and programming funding recommendations.
Application Process
Application period opened February 1 and closed February 28, 2022.
There were 12 applicants overall:
1 for FY2021/22 Special Project Funding
11 for FY2022/23 Programming Funding
The MLR Allocations Committee met on March 29, for a first review of the applications where the applicants had the opportunity to address the Committee. On April 6, a second review meeting was held. The meeting was very productive, and the MLR Allocations Committee made
recommendations for the expenditure of Measure U Programming funds to the MLR Board of Directors for review. The MLR Board of Directors convened for a Public Hearing on May 3, 2022 where the Allocations Committee shared their recommendations, and the applicants had the opportunity to address the entire Board.
Measure U funding recommendations for programming are included below and in the attached resolution. The recommendations include $3,800 for one project from special project funding for FY21/22 and allocations to nine specific programming activities totaling $154,500 for FY22/23.
FY21/22 – Special Project
1. Mammoth Channel $3,800.00
Funding Recommendation $ 3,800.00
FY22/23 – Programming
1. Valentine Eastern Sierra Reserve $ 10,000.00
2. Friends of the Inyo $ 11,000.00
3. Eastern Sierra Arts Alliance $ 40,000.00
4. Eastern Sierra Avalanche Center $ 9,500.00
5. Sierra Classic Theater $ 11,000.00
6. Chamber Music Unbound $ 26,000.00
7. Eastern Sierra Symphony $ 14,500.00
8. Mono Arts Council $ 30,000.00
9. Mono County Libraries Maker Space $ 2,500.00
Funding Recommendation $ 154,500.00
Attachment:
Resolution approving Measure U Special Project Funding and Programming Recommendations.
Attachment 2
RESOLUTION 22 -
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PROGRAMMING ALLOCATIONS FROM THE FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 MEASURE U BUDGET AND THE ALLOCATION OF SPECIAL PROJECT FUNDING FROM THE FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 MEASURE U BUDGET WHEREAS, the Town Council approved in March 2010 the Utility Users Tax extension at a rate of 2. 5% and the tax is a special tax restricted for funding planning, construction, operation, maintenance, programming, and administration of facilities and projects for Mobility, Recreation, and Arts 8s Culture, and is commonly referred to as Measure U "; and
WHEREAS, Mammoth Lakes Recreation has reviewed, evaluated, conducted a public hearing, and presented arts and culture programming and special project funding recommendations to the Town Council for the expenditure of Measure U funds; and
WHEREAS, recommended funding provided direction for allocations to be made in the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget for special projects and from Fiscal Year 2022/23 for specific programming allocations; and
WHEREAS, adequate funds are available for these purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Mammoth Lakes for the allocation of Measure U funds as follows:
1) The above recitals are true and correct.
2) The Town Manager is directed to process nine arts and culture programming agreements totaling one hundred and fifty-four thousand, five hundred dollars ($154,500) from the FY 2022/23 Measure U budget, provided all requirements are meet by each entity to receive the approved allocation as provided for in Schedule A of Exhibit 1 which is made a part of this resolution by reference. 3) The Town Manager is directed to process the required agreement for the Mammoth Channel program allocation in the amount of three thousand and eight hundred dollars ($3,800) from the approved FY2021/22 Measure U special projects budget, as provided for in Schedule A of Exhibit 1 which is made a part of this resolution by reference.
4) The Town Council finds that the use of Measure U funds for Recreation, Arts, and Culture and the support of the programming as provided herein meets the public purpose of the funds and provides a direct benefit to the economic vitality of the Town of Mammoth Lakes.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th Day of June, 2022.
_________________________
LYNDA SALCIDO, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
JAMIE GRAY, Town Clerk
Resolution 22 –
Exhibit 1
Schedule A
FY21/22 – Special Project
1. Mammoth Channel $3,800.00
Total Recommendation $ 3,800.00
FY22/23 – Programming
1. Valentine Eastern Sierra Reserve $ 10,000.00
2. Friends of the Inyo $ 11,000.00
3. Eastern Sierra Arts Alliance $ 40,000.00
4. Eastern Sierra Avalanche Center $ 9,500.00
5. Sierra Classic Theater $ 11,000.00
6. Chamber Music Unbound $ 26,000.00
7. Eastern Sierra Symphony $ 14,500.00
8. Mono Arts Council $ 30,000.00
9. Mono County Libraries Maker Space $ 2,500.00
Total Recommendation $ 154,500.00
Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Approve and adopt the resolution establishing a reclassification of specified full-time, permanent General Employees’ Association (GEA) and Public Works Employees’ Association (PWEA) positions.
Council Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Prepared by: Amanda Pelham, Human Resources Manager
Recommended Motion: Approve the Resolution establishing the reclassification of specified GEA and PWEA positions, as well as accompanying salary schedules as outlined in Exhibit A and Exhibit B.
Summary: California minimum wage increased to $15 per hour effective January 1, 2022, and the Town of Mammoth Lakes (“Town”) has an immediate need to address the effects of compaction due to the adjusted compensation schedule of limited-term employees with specified full-time, permanent GEA and PWEA positions to remain competitive and promote retention.
Town Management has met and conferred in good faith with the GEA and PWEA to address the compaction of limited-term employees with the following positions within each bargaining unit; GEA: Engineering Technician, Permit Technician I, Program and Facilities Coordinator, Revenue Specialist, Assistant Clerk, Finance Analyst, and Recreation Supervisor; PWEA: Equipment Mechanic Trainee, Parks Maintenance Worker, Public Works Facilities Worker, Parks Maintenance Lead Worker, and Public Works Maintenance Worker.
The updated salary schedules for full-time, permanent GEA and PWEA positions as provided in Exhibit A and Exhibit B will be effective July 11, 2022, the beginning of the first full pay period in July 2022, following approval and adoption of the Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 22--XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH
LAKES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE RECLASSIFICATION OF SPECIFIED GENERAL EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION AND PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION POSITIONS
WHEREAS, California minimum wage increased to $15 per hour effective January 1, 2022, and the compensation schedule for limited-term employees was adjusted to accommodate the new requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Mammoth Lakes (“Town”) has an immediate need to address the compaction of the adjusted compensation schedule for limited-term employees based on the increase of the California minimum wage with specified full-time, permanent positions to remain competitive in the job market and retain employees; and WHEREAS, Town Management and the General Employees’ Association (“GEA”) and Public Works Employees’ Association (“PWEA”) have met and conferred in good faith to address the compaction with, and reclassification of, specified full-time, permanent positions within each bargaining unit; and
WHEREAS, an update of salary schedules is required to reflect the reclassification of the following GEA positions: Engineering Technician, Permit Technician I, Program and Facilities Coordinator, Revenue Specialist, Assistant Clerk, Finance Analyst, and Recreation Supervisor as outlined in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, an update of salary schedules is required to reflect the reclassification of the following PWEA positions: Equipment Mechanic Trainee, Parks Maintenance Worker, Public Works Facilities Worker, Parks Maintenance Lead Worker, and Public Works Maintenance Worker as outlined in Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the updated GEA and PWEA salary schedules will be effective beginning with the first full pay period in July 2022, inclusive of the 2.5% pay adjustment outlined in Article 20, “Salaries and Wages” of each bargaining units’ respective Memorandum of Understanding.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES AS FOLLOWS:
The Town Council does hereby approve the reclassification of the following GEA positions:
Engineering Technician, Permit Technician I, Program and Facilities Coordinator, Revenue Specialist, Assistant Clerk, Finance Analyst, and Recreation Supervisor as outlined in Exhibit A.
Additionally, the Town Council does hereby approve the reclassification of the following PWEA positions: Equipment Mechanic Trainee, Parks Maintenance Worker, Public Works Facilities Worker, Parks Maintenance Lead Worker, and Public Works Maintenance Worker as outlined in Exhibit B.
Resolution No. 22-
2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Resolution is effective upon adoption, with salary schedules for full-time, permanent GEA and PWEA positions as provided in Exhibit A and Exhibit B to be effective July 11, 2022, the beginning of the first full pay period in July 2022.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15
TH DAY OF JUNE 2022.
_________________________________
LYNDA SALCIDO, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
JAMIE GRAY, Town Clerk
FY 2022-23: Effective July 11, 2022 Pay Range
Rev. June, 2022
A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H
Engineering Technician G/139 46,589 48,918 51,364 53,932 56,629 59,460 62,433 65,555 22.3986 23.5183 24.6942 25.9288 27.2255 28.5865 30.0159 31.5168 Permit Technician I G/139 46,589 48,918 51,364 53,932 56,629 59,460 62,433 65,555 22.3986 23.5183 24.6942 25.9288 27.2255 28.5865 30.0159 31.5168 Program and Facilities Coordinator G/139 46,589 48,918 51,364 53,932 56,629 59,460 62,433 65,555 22.3986 23.5183 24.6942 25.9288 27.2255 28.5865 30.0159 31.5168 Revenue Specialist G/139 46,589 48,918 51,364 53,932 56,629 59,460 62,433 65,555 22.3986 23.5183 24.6942 25.9288 27.2255 28.5865 30.0159 31.5168 Records Supervisor G/139 46,589 48,918 51,364 53,932 56,629 59,460 62,433 65,555 22.3986 23.5183 24.6942 25.9288 27.2255 28.5865 30.0159 31.5168 Assistant Clerk G/145 49,456 51,929 54,525 57,251 60,114 63,120 66,276 69,590 23.7769 24.9659 26.2139 27.5245 28.9010 30.3462 31.8635 33.4567 Finance Analyst G/145 49,456 51,929 54,525 57,251 60,114 63,120 66,276 69,590 23.7769 24.9659 26.2139 27.5245 28.9010 30.3462 31.8635 33.4567 Senior Accounting Assistant G/145 49,456 51,929 54,525 57,251 60,114 63,120 66,276 69,590 23.7769 24.9659 26.2139 27.5245 28.9010 30.3462 31.8635 33.4567 Senior Community Services Officer G/145 49,456 51,929 54,525 57,251 60,114 63,120 66,276 69,590 23.7769 24.9659 26.2139 27.5245 28.9010 30.3462 31.8635 33.4567 Engineering Assistant G/151 52,501 55,126 57,882 60,776 63,815 67,006 70,356 73,874 25.2409 26.5029 27.8279 29.2192 30.6803 32.2144 33.8250 35.5163 Recreation Supervisor G/151 52,501 55,126 57,882 60,776 63,815 67,006 70,356 73,874 25.2409 26.5029 27.8279 29.2192 30.6803 32.2144 33.8250 35.5163 Assistant Planner G/156 55,176 57,938 60,835 63,877 67,071 70,425 73,949 77,643 26.5284 27.8548 29.2476 30.7101 32.2457 33.8582 35.5510 37.3284 Code Compliance Officer G/156 55,176 57,938 60,835 63,877 67,071 70,425 73,949 77,643 26.5284 27.8548 29.2476 30.7101 32.2457 33.8582 35.5510 37.3284 Permit Technician/Plans Examiner G/156 55,176 57,938 60,835 63,877 67,071 70,425 73,949 77,643 26.5284 27.8548 29.2476 30.7101 32.2457 33.8582 35.5510 37.3284 Assistant Engineer G/167 61,564 64,642 67,874 71,268 74,831 78,573 82,502 86,627 29.5981 31.0779 32.6317 34.2635 35.9764 37.7755 39.6644 41.6476 Associate Planner G/172 64,705 67,940 71,337 74,904 78,649 82,581 86,710 91,046 31.1082 32.6635 34.2966 36.0115 37.8120 39.7024 41.6875 43.7721 Building Inspector/Plans Examiner G/172 64,705 67,940 71,337 74,904 78,649 82,581 86,710 91,046 31.1082 32.6635 34.2966 36.0115 37.8120 39.7024 41.6875 43.7721 Payroll/Human Resources Specialist G/172 64,705 67,940 71,337 74,904 78,649 82,581 86,710 91,046 31.1082 32.6635 34.2966 36.0115 37.8120 39.7024 41.6875 43.7721 Public Works Maintenance Supervisor G/172 64,705 67,940 71,337 74,904 78,649 82,581 86,710 91,046 31.1082 32.6635 34.2966 36.0115 37.8120 39.7024 41.6875 43.7721 Rate Type: Annual Rate Type: Hourly
EXHIBIT A
Town of Mammoth Lakes General Employees’ Association (GEA) Salary Schedules – by Position
FY 2022-23: Effective July 11, 2022 Pay Range
Rev. June, 2022
A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H
Equipment Mechanic Trainee PW/133 45,443 47,715 50,101 52,606 55,236 57,998 60,898 63,943 21.8476 22.9399 24.0870 25.2913 26.5558 27.8837 29.2779 30.7418 Parks Maintenance Worker PW/133 45,443 47,715 50,101 52,606 55,236 57,998 60,898 63,943 21.8476 22.9399 24.0870 25.2913 26.5558 27.8837 29.2779 30.7418 Public Works Facilities Worker PW/133 45,443 47,715 50,101 52,606 55,236 57,998 60,898 63,943 21.8476 22.9399 24.0870 25.2913 26.5558 27.8837 29.2779 30.7418 Parks Maintenance Lead Worker PW/139 48,239 50,651 53,184 55,843 58,635 61,567 64,645 67,877 23.1918 24.3514 25.5692 26.8476 28.1899 29.5995 31.0793 32.6332 Public Works Maintenance Worker PW/139 48,239 50,651 53,184 55,843 58,635 61,567 64,645 67,877 23.1918 24.3514 25.5692 26.8476 28.1899 29.5995 31.0793 32.6332 Public Works Maintenance Lead Worker PW/144 50,699 53,234 55,896 58,691 61,626 64,707 67,942 71,339 24.3745 25.5933 26.8731 28.2168 29.6279 31.1091 32.6644 34.2976 Airport Maintenance Coordinator PW/149 53,285 55,949 58,746 61,683 64,767 68,005 71,405 74,975 25.6178 26.8986 28.2433 29.6553 31.1380 32.6947 34.3293 36.0457 Equipment Mechanic PW/149 53,285 55,949 58,746 61,683 64,767 68,005 71,405 74,975 25.6178 26.8986 28.2433 29.6553 31.1380 32.6947 34.3293 36.0457 Equipment Mechanic Lead Worker PW/156 57,129 59,985 62,984 66,133 69,440 72,912 76,558 80,386 27.4659 28.8389 30.2808 31.7947 33.3846 35.0538 36.8067 38.6471 Airport Operations and Maintenance Lead Worker PW/156 57,129 59,985 62,984 66,133 69,440 72,912 76,558 80,386 27.4659 28.8389 30.2808 31.7947 33.3846 35.0538 36.8067 38.6471 Public Works Maintenance Supervisor PW/156 57,129 59,985 62,984 66,133 69,440 72,912 76,558 80,386 27.4659 28.8389 30.2808 31.7947 33.3846 35.0538 36.8067 38.6471 Rate Type: Annual Rate Type: Hourly
EXHIBIT B
Town of Mammoth Lakes Public Works Employees’ Association (PWEA) Salary Schedules – by Position
Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Adopt the resolution authorizing temporary closure of certain Town roads for the annual Fourth of July Parade and Freedom Mile run on July 4, 2022.
Council Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Prepared by: Stuart Brown, Parks and Recreation Director Recommended Motion: Adopt the resolution authorizing temporary closures of certain Town roads for the annual Fourth of July Parade and Freedom Mile run on July 4, 2022.
Summary: The Town of Mammoth Lakes desires to work with the private sector in the implementation of special events that increase visitation to the community. The Fourth of July Parade and the Freedom Mile Run will enhance the quality of life for residents and promote visitation of Mammoth Lakes and the temporary Town road closures will enhance public event safety and provide for emergency access to and through the events.
Town staff is recommending Town Council adopt the resolution authorizing temporary closures of certain Town roads for the annual Fourth of July Parade and Freedom Mile run on July 4, 2022.
RESOLUTION NO. 22 -
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY CLOSURES OF CERTAIN TOWN ROADS FOR
THE ANNUAL FOURTH OF JULY PARADE AND FREEDOM MILE RUN
ON JULY 4, 2022
WHEREAS, the Town of Mammoth Lakes desires to work with the private sector in the implementation of special events that increase visitation to the community; and WHEREAS, the Fourth of July Parade and the Freedom Mile Run will enhance the quality of life for residents and promote visitation of Mammoth Lakes; and
WHEREAS, the temporary Town road closures will enhance public event safety and provide for emergency access to and through the events; and
WHEREAS, a portion of proceeds from the Freedom Mile will be donated to local non-profit organizations for charitable uses.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Council of the Town of Mammoth Lakes, California, hereby:
1. Declares the program is not a project and is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act because it is a minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment per Section 15304 (e); and
2. Declares that Old Mammoth Road will be closed from Minaret Road to Sherwin Creek Road from 8:30 AM to 10:30 AM, July 4, 2022; and
3. Declares that Old Mammoth Road will be closed from Minaret Road to Main Street from 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM, July 4, 2022, when all traffic control devices will be removed; and
4. Declares that traffic on Chateau Road from Azimuth to Old Mammoth Road will be limited from 8:00 AM to 11:30 PM, July 4, 2022, when all traffic control devices will be removed; and
5. Declares there is a public benefit; and
6. Authorizes ‘no parking’ and traffic control equipment to be placed along the street prior to the event; and
7. Directs the MLPD and Public Works Department to monitor the traffic within the event area and make any modifications that are deemed necessary for public safety.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15
th day of June, 2022.
____________________________
LYNDA SALCIDO, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
JAMIE GRAY, Town Clerk
Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Public Hearing to consider three appeals of the May 11, 2022, Planning and Economic Development Commission Decision to Approve the Limelight Hotel Project (Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 22-002, Use Permit (UPA) 22-001, and Design Review (DR) 22-001) Council Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Prepared by: Kim Cooke, Senior Planner
Recommended Motion: Staff recommends the Town Council receive staff’s presentation, open the public hearing to allow public comment, and continue the public hearing to the July 6, 2022, Town Council meeting.
Summary: The Limelight Hotel project consists of the construction of a six-story, 185,754 squarefoot condominium hotel which features a mix of hotel and residential uses consisting of 151 hotel rooms and 15 for-sale residential condominium units. Parking for the development is located within an understructure parking garage that accommodates 179 vehicles to be managed by full-time valet parking staff. Amenities are oriented to hotel guests and residential owners, including a hotel lobby and bar, town hall dining, living room, meeting and conference rooms, kid’s area, ski club lounge, fitness center, outdoor pool and jacuzzi deck, and outdoor seating/activity areas.
The Limelight Hotel development project was considered by the Planning and Economic Development Commission at a noticed public hearing on May 11, 2022.
The project was approved by a 3-0 vote of the Commission, with one No vote and one recusal.
Three separate appeals were received within the 15-day appeal period following the project approval. The primary reasons provided for the appeals include objection to the level of environmental analysis performed pursuant to CEQA, objection to the proposed geothermal system at the site, and objection to the roof design and mechanical equipment screening.
In light of the two appeals received regarding the proposed geothermal system and associated CEQA analysis, the applicant has requested removal of the geothermal component of the project. Therefore, staff needs additional time to adequately respond to the geothermal and CEQA related appeals and to make appropriate modifications to the project description.
While this item will not be considered until the July 6, 2022, Town Council meeting, the public hearing will be opened to allow for public comment on this item. A complete review packet including an updated staff report and resolution will be prepared for consideration at the July 6th Town Council meeting.
{00275039.1} Attachment A- Page 1 of 8
ATTACHMENT A
TO MAMMOTH COMMUNITY WATER DISTRICT’S APPEAL OF PEDC
APPLICATION NO. TTM 22-002, ET AL.
What Is Being Appealed?
The Mammoth Community Water District (“MCWD” or “District”) appeals the decision of the Town of Mammoth Lakes Planning and Economic Development Commission’s (“PEDC” or “Commission”) action to approve the addition of two geothermal wells to the Limelight Hotel project (“Project”). These two geothermal wells would provide heating and other power requirements to the Project (the “Geothermal Component”). This approval was based on the use of a CEQA addendum and was part of the PEDC’s approval at its May 11, 2022 meeting of the staff recommendation under Agenda Item 4.2 to adopt Resolution 22-12 to make CEQA and Municipal Code findings and approving Tentative Tract Map #TTM 22- 002, Use Permit #UPA 22-001, and Major Design Review #DR 22-001 with conditions.
MCWD appeals only the approval of the addition of the Geothermal Component to the Project as an illegal action in violation of CEQA. MCWD does not object to or appeal from any other portion of the approvals made by the PEDC at its May 11, 2022 meeting.
Rationale For Appeal:
I. The addendum to the 1999 EIR violates CEQA because neither the Addendum nor the Drilling Report on which it relies includes any analysis of potentially significant environmental effects or any substantial evidence to support a noeffect finding permitting the preparation of the Addendum.
The substantive part of MCWD’s appeal is simple -- PEDC staff engaged in undue haste to bring the Geothermal Component to the Commission for approval and in complete disregard of known and identified potentially significant environmental impacts that might result from drilling geothermal wells in the heart of the Town of Mammoth Lakes and directly through the community’s main water supply. PEDC staff also misrepresented the character of the Geothermal Component, thus making it appear less impactful than it would be in reality. In fact, any reasonably diligent and lawful analysis would have identified the possibility for the Geothermal Component to cause significant environmental impacts. Most notably, the construction and operation of the Geothermal Component has the potential to reduce and/or contaminate the Town’s water supply, perhaps severely enough that there is a significant possibility no remediation could effectively treat the contamination to safe drinking water levels. If such an impact occurred, the Mammoth Lakes community would not have a safe, reliable drinking water supply.
Sadly, this appeal was entirely avoidable if the PEDC had granted MCWD’s request and stayed any action to approve the Geothermal Component pending consultation with MCWD, CalGEM, and other stakeholders. The necessity for filing this appeal, which wastes public resources and imposes significant new legal risks on the Town, is particularly
{00275039.1} Attachment A- Page 2 of 8
egregious because MCWD’s concerns about the impacts of geothermal projects is longstanding and well-known to Town/PEDC staff and everyone else in the community. Yet, despite PEDC staff’s knowledge, they only made a casual effort to engage MCWD or other stakeholders early in the process of working with the developer on a generic geothermal project and appear to have withheld the details of the applicant’s actual proposal to add the Geothermal Component to the Project to the last possible moment. This lack of basic diligence required by law occurred even though applicant’s proposed change to the Project was being contemplated as least as early as June 8, 2021, when the Geothermal Resource Group issued its Limelight Hotel Geothermal Drilling Study (the “Drilling Report”). Note that the Drilling Study identified the possibility of impacts from the Geothermal Component and MCWD’s likely concerns with the proposal more than one year ago. (See Drilling Report, subsection 6.1.2, page 44; subsection 6.4.1, pages 45-46; and attached March 5, 2021 letter to Dan Patton and Greg Villegas of WATG, pages 1-2.) In spite of these identified concerns, and a 220-page staff report which appears to be PEDC staff’s effort to paper over the defects in its process to evaluate the new Geothermal Component and include stakeholder input, PEDC staff concluded without any real investigation, communication or analysis, and without any substantial technical or other evidence, that, “the proposed addition of the [Geothermal Component] to the Limelight Hotel development would not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.” (See Staff Report for PEDC consideration of Project approvals, Key Issue #4, page 574 of 593 of May 11, 2022 PEDC meeting agenda packet (the “May 11 Packet”).) Yet nowhere in the 220-page staff report and attachments for this item is there any meaningful analysis of potential effects or anything supporting PEDC staff’s conclusion that none exist. The CEQA addendum prepared to support the approval of the Geothermal Component makes conclusions that no impacts would occur, but fails to cite any technical data or studies to support that conclusion. (See, e.g., May 11 Packet, Limelight Hotel – Addendum to the North Village Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, May 2022 (the “Addendum”), Section 3.8, Groundwater Supplies, page 641; addendum, Section 3.10, Public Services/Utilities, page 645; Addendum, Section 3.14, Hazards/Hazardous Materials, page 647.)
To compound its failure to comply with CEQA, PEDC staff’s so-called “analysis” is based on at least two false premises. The first false premise is that the Geothermal Component would be a “closed loop system”, meaning that a heat transfer fluid is circulated through a closed loop of pressure-tight piping underground or submerged in water, and a heat exchanger transfers heat between the refrigerant in a heat pump and the heat transfer fluid in the closed loop.. (See, e.g., May 11 Packet, Staff Report for PEDC consideration of Project approvals, Table 3, page 567; Addendum, Section 3.8, Groundwater Supplies, page 641.) But the fact is that the Geothermal Component is not intended to be a closed loop system at all, as a simple reading of the Drilling Report would reveal. (See Drilling Report, Executive Summary, fourth paragraph, page 5; subsection 3.1, page 31.)
{00275039.1} Attachment A- Page 3 of 8
The second false premise is that the Addendum properly and completely describes the Geothermal Component, so that there is an “accurate, stable and finite project description,” which California courts recognize as “the sine qua non” of an informative and legally sufficient CEQA review document.1 The lack of a proper description of the Geothermal Component is a sufficient basis alone to invalidate the Addendum and reverse the PEDC’s approval of the Geothermal Component.
The insufficiency of the Addendum as a basis for the PEDC to approve such a significant change in the Project is apparent because the Addendum describes the Geothermal Component as consisting only of an open-loop geothermal well system. But the Addendum fails to discuss how those wells would be harnessed to actually generate power and heat. In fact, the well could not do anything by themselves. In order to operate them as a power system, the applicant also will be required to construct and operate mechanical systems in order to heat, cool or generate electricity utilizing the geothermal energy produced by the wells. There is no mention or discussion of such a plant, nor of its location or the potential hazards inherent in such an operation. Those hazards include heat transfer fluids used in the power system and risks inherent in their transportation, handling, and storage. Such fluids can be toxic and require special handling and containment facilities.
Yet, the only project description and supporting evidence PEDC staff relies on is a concept provided by the Project applicant in the form of the Drilling Report, which was written for the express purpose of evaluating the geologic and economic feasibility of a geothermal project. The report does not contain any meaningful identification or analysis of potentially significant impacts that might be caused by the Geothermal Component, including pressure effects and water quality effects that could result from drilling and operation of the two offset, open-loop wells. The Drilling Report also fails to fully describe the Geothermal Component’s true scope or risks inherent in this new Project element, or propose any mitigation measures or alternatives to address the potential impacts. (See Drilling Report, generally and Introduction, pages 6-7.)
There is much more that renders PEDC’s staff’s use of the Addendum illegal under CEQA.
MCWD’s chief concern, and an issue which barely rated a mention in the 220-page staff report, is that the two wells to be drilled as part of the Geothermal Component would be located between 1,000 and 1,700 feet of one of the District’s major production wells, Well 17.
This well produces up to 25% of MCWD’s drinking water in dry years when minimum amounts of surface water are available, including in the 2022 water year. Thus, Well 17 is critical for maintaining adequate water supplies to serve the Mammoth Lakes community in a drought year, such as we are currently in. In addition, Well 17 is already the warmest well in the District’s groundwater supply system, with a chemical composition indicative of mixing with geothermal waters as documented by the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) 2019 analysis of monitoring data collected as part of the CD-IV Groundwater Mitigation and Monitoring Program (USGS, 2019). This geothermal water has higher 1 City of San Jose v. Great Oaks Water Co. (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 1005, 1017.
{00275039.1} Attachment A- Page 4 of 8
concentrations of heavy metals and dissolved constituents including arsenic which is already elevated at Well 17 compared with other MCWD wells. If the concentration of arsenic, and other contaminates including chloride and boron, increases as a result of drilling and operating the Geothermal Component, it could make water from Well 17 untreatable. All PEDC staff had to do was pick up the phone and call MCWD staff to obtain this information and identify the potential for such a significant environmental impact.
Additional defects in the Addendum process and the basis for a much more robust CEQA analysis in the form of a supplemental or subsequent EIR include the following.
The Drilling Report mentions that the applicant will need to provide proof of noninteraction with water supply, yet there is no discussion regarding how this will be accomplished. Or of the level of risk of interaction or any mitigation measures or alternatives that might avoid such potential harm to the Mammoth Lakes community’s water supply.
The Project documents also paint an overly simplistic representation of a “shallow reservoir” and the “deeper reservoir” and assumes, without evidence, that they are completely distinct and separated by an aquitard or other barrier that the well driller can simply punch through and case without any ill effects. These are all unsubstantiated assumptions that are neither analyzed in any meaningful way or supported by any references to technical data or documents or included in the record. As noted in the Drilling Report, “…the entire property sits above the Long Valley Caldera ring fracture zone, which is a known conduit for geothermal fluids just to the north.” The report’s authors point this out because they hope to drill into rock with lots of faulting and high permeability. The same faulting could be a conduit to transport untreatable geothermal fluids into the “shallow reservoir” comprising the community’s drinking water supply. The Drilling Report also notes that both the “shallow reservoir” and the “deeper reservoir” have elevated Chloride to Boron ratios indicating geothermal influence in both. There is even speculation in the report on how the geothermal fluids might be mixing in the system. Yet, PEDC staff ignored all of these potentially serious adverse impacts and instead dismissed them with no more than a conclusion that is essentially “there is nothing to see here, so let’s move on.”
Given the evident, potentially serious adverse environmental impacts of the proposed new Geothermal Component and its novel use in Mammoth Lakes, not only did PEDC staff have a duty to properly identify and fully analyze those impacts, but staff had an obligation in the circumstances to evaluate potentially feasible mitigation measures and project alternatives. For example, the Drilling Report advises that a true “closed-loop” heat pump system could be an effective alternative. Another option might be an off-site geothermal power system located in a much lower-risk location that could serve the existing and future
{00275039.1} Attachment A- Page 5 of 8
North Village Specific Plan Area development.2 Also, given the risks of the Geothermal Component and the Project applicant’s unequivocal statements at the May 11, 2022 PEDC meeting that use of geothermal energy in the Project is significantly more expensive, a “no project” alternative should have been evaluated because it would pose less risk to the drinking water and less risk to the applicant. This failure is sufficient grounds for the Town Counsel to reverse the PEDC’s approval of the Geothermal Component and to direct that PEDC staff prepare a supplemental or subsequent EIR which includes an appropriate alternatives analysis.
Likewise, in light of the readily available information that the new Geothermal Component had the potential to cause significant environmental effects, PEDC staff should have considered what mitigation measures might be required to reduce those potential impacts to less than significant. Feasible measures include pre-Project modeling, construction of monitoring wells both to collect pre-Project baseline water quality and pressure data and to monitor on-going operations to help in early detection of possible migration of geothermal fluids from the deep reservoir into the cold shallow reservoir that provides the community water supply, stress tests as part of well commissioning, and an adaptive monitoring and remediation plan if early impacts are detected. Many of these mitigation measures have been incorporated in the mitigation and monitoring plan for Ormat’s Casa Diablo-IV project.
MCWD hereby provides Appendix 1 to this appeal, which is a technical memorandum prepared by the District’s consulting hydrogeologists, West Yost Associates. This technical memorandum analyzes the Addendum and Drilling Report and explains those documents’ deficiencies and identifies the potentially significant environmental impacts of the Geothermal Component that would have been readily identifiable and subject to further analysis in any competent and diligent CEQA review of this significant Project change.
II. The PEDC violated CEQA by failing to comply with its duties as the lead agency when it failed to perform any meaningful analysis of the potentially significant effects of the Geothermal Component.
The procedural part of MCWD’s appeal also is simple – The PDEC violated CEQA by evading its role as lead agency for the project and instead delegating its independent and primary duty to have analyzed the potentially significant effects of the Geothermal Component to a responsible agency, in this case the Division of Geologic Energy Management Division of the California Department of Conservation (“CalGEM”). This violation is an independent and sufficient ground for the Town Council to reverse the PEDC’s approval of the Geothermal Component.
2 The existing Village development is already plumbed to be operated using geothermal energy. Also note that MCWD has the latent power in statute to own and operate a geothermal energy system to serve the Town.
{00275039.1} Attachment A- Page 6 of 8
It is well established that CEQA embodies California’s “strong and enduring public policy to protect the environment” by requiring state and local agencies to execute their duty to give “major consideration” to preventing environmental damage.3 The purpose of CEQA is to: (1) inform agency decision-makers and the public about potential, significant environmental effects of proposed projects; (2) identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced; (3) prevent potentially significant damage from projects by changing them through use of feasible alternatives or mitigation measures; and (4) disclose to the public the reasons why an agency approved a project involving significant environmental impacts.4 As the California Supreme Court has ruled:
CEQA review is undertaken by the lead agency, defined as “the public agency which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project which may have a significant effect on the environment.” The lead agency’s function in the environmental review process is so important that it cannot be delegated to another body.
5 As noted in Section 15020 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (hereafter, the “CEQA Guidelines”):
A public agency must meet its own responsibilities under CEQA and shall not rely on comments from other public agencies or private citizens as a substitute for work CEQA requires the lead agency to accomplish. For example, a lead agency is responsible for the adequacy of its environmental documents. The lead agency shall not knowingly release a deficient document hoping that public comments will correct defects in the document.
As also stated, and often repeated, by the California Supreme Court and appellate courts, the EIR is the “heart of CEQA” and is required to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of a decision before it is made. To fulfill this duty, a public agency must not only use an EIR to identify the environmental impacts and mitigation measures to be considered in a CEQA review, but also project alternatives including a no project option. The alternatives and mitigation analysis forms “the core of an EIR.”6
This appeal involves an addendum to an existing EIR, which has been modified several times previously. As PEDC staff admits both in the Addendum itself and several times during the agenda item at the May 11, 2022 PEDC meeting to consider the addition of the 3 Friends of the Eel River v. North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, 712, citing Public Resources Code section 21067.
4 Tomlinson v. County of Alameda ((2012) 54 Cal.4th 281, 285-286. 5 Public Resources Code section 21002.1, subd. (d) [“The lead agency shall be responsible for considering the effects, both individual and collective, of all activities involved in a project.”]; Friends of the Eel River, supra, 3 Cal.5th at pages 712-713 (italics added; original emphasis and internal citations omitted).
6 Id., at page 713.
{00275039.1} Attachment A- Page 7 of 8
Geothermal Component, the Geothermal Component is an entirely new addition to the Project that was not previously considered or analyzed in the 1999 SEIR or any previous modification to it. The new and previously unanalyzed addition of the Geothermal Component fundamentally changes an important aspect of the Project – substituting a relatively rare, unconventional energy source for heating and powering a hotel operation instead of using conventional propane and electrical power sources already available from existing providers immediately within the Project vicinity.
CEQA permitted the PEDC to consider using a CEQA addendum for the Project change to include the Geothermal Component. But the PEDC staff’s decision to use an addendum required complying with Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines section 15162 by finding, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the record, that the Geothermal Component would not involve any new significant environmental effects not known or reviewed in previous project CEQA documents and that would necessitate the preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR. As noted in CEQA Guidelines section 15164, an addendum may only be used if project changes are minor and technical in nature.
If a determination to use an addendum is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, it is subject to challenge and a court may invalidate the addendum.7 As noted in Part I of this appeal, the PEDC’s decision was made without any substantial evidentiary support in the record. Town staff simply concluded, without any analysis, supporting evidence or consultation with responsible agencies and experts, that the Geothermal Component would not have any significant environmental impacts. Worse, and as noted in this Part II, PEDC staff simply absolved itself of addressing the issue in any meaningful way and instead punted the issue without any basis in fact to CalGEM.
In an analogous case involving the City of San Jose’s proposed change in water supply sources for a land use project approval, a California Court of Appeal concluded that the city violated CEQA by “simply ignor[ing] the potentially adverse environmental impacts wrought by a change in the water supply system from one based on . . . preexisting wells to one based on . . . proposed new wells in an area known to have underground contamination of the water supply.”8 The court was particularly concerned that the lack of any substantive analysis of potential impacts of the project change deprived the public and agency decisionmakers of any meaningful participation and information, noting that, “Only through an accurate view of the project may affected outsiders and public decision-makers balance the proposal’s benefit against its environmental cost, consider mitigation measures, assess the advantage of terminating the proposal and weigh other alternatives in the balance.9
In addition, PEDC staff violated CEQA by failing to perform their duty to engage in early and full collaboration with MCWD, CalGEM, and other responsible agencies to assist in staff’s identification and analysis of the potentially significant effects of the Geothermal 7 Save our Heritage Organisation v. City of San Diego (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 656, 667. 8 City of San Jose v. Great Oaks Water Co., supra, 192 Cal.App.3d at pages 1016-1017. 9 Id., at page 1017.
{00275039.1} Attachment A- Page 8 of 8
Component. Because the Geothermal Component is an entirely new Project component and raises the potential for significant environmental effects that would not have been raised when the Project was planned to use conventional power sources delivered by established providers, PEDC staff should have engaged with MCWD and other responsible agencies as soon as possible after the Project applicant proposed replacing conventional power sources with the Geothermal component. This is particularly true of those with special expertise such as MCWD and CalGEM. (Public Resources Code section 21153, see also, Section 21003.1; CEQA Guidelines section 15086.)
As recognized by PEDC staff both in the staff report and in verbal comments during the May 11, 2022 PEDC meeting, both MCWD and CalGEM have special interests and expertise regarding the potential environmental effects of drilling and operating geothermal wells. In spite of this admitted knowledge, MCWD staff only learned of the specific details of the proposed Geothermal Project when it received agenda notice of it on May 6 and, even then, had to ask PEDC staff to provide the Drilling Report. Staff did not provide the report until May 10, one day before the PEDC meeting at which this significant change was approved. Staff’s obvious failure to consult with expert and responsible agencies also was clear at the hearing – they could not describe the CalGEM permitting process or provide the commission any assurance of the scope of CalGEM’s authority to further review or condition the Geothermal Component. As shown on Appendix 2 to this appeal, the scope of CalGEM’s authority and review of the Geothermal Component will be extremely limited and is unlikely to include any substantive CEQA review of the component’s potentially significant environmental effects.
MCWD’s Request for Council Action in Response to this Appeal:
Based on the PEDC’s violations of CEQA in approving the Geothermal Component, MCWD requests that the Town Council reverse the approval of the Geothermal Component and remand the issue to the PEDC with direction to: (1) conduct an appropriate review of the potential environmental impacts of the Geothermal Component, which is a completely new component of the Project not analyzed in the 1999 SEIR or any subsequent environmental document prepared for it. That direction also should instruct PEDC staff to consult with MCWD, CalGEM, and other interested regulatory/responsible agencies including Mono County, the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District, the SWRCB’s Division of Drinking Water, and Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board, in order to obtain information about potentially significant environmental effects of the new Geothermal Component of the Project; and (2) prepare a supplement to the SEIR or subsequent EIR as necessary to analyze any significant impacts of the Geothermal Component and alternatives to the Geothermal Component identified during the study and consultation with responsible and expert agencies.
2020 Research Park Drive
Suite 100
Davis CA 95618
530.756.5905 phone
530.756.5991 fax
westyost.com
{00275225.1}
APPENDIX 1
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 25, 2022 Project No.: 947-80-20-02
SENT VIA: EMAIL
TO: Mammoth Community Water District
FROM: Kenneth Loy, PG #7008
REVIEWED BY: Mark Wildermuth, PE, RCE #32331
SUBJECT: Preliminary Review of Limelight Hotel, Addendum to the North Village Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, and Limelight Hotel Geothermal Drilling Study
West Yost conducted a preliminary review of the referenced documents and identified several concerns, which are documented in this technical memorandum.
BACKGROUND
Limelight Mammoth, LLC (Applicant) has requested approval to develop a 185,754 square foot, 166-unit condominium hotel (Limelight Hotel project) within the Town of Mammoth Lakes’ (Town) North Village Specific Plan (NVSP) area. The Town made the determination that the Limelight Hotel project, as currently proposed, is consistent with prior NVSP environmental analyses required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), except for a proposed geothermal well system, which would be located at the Limelight Hotel project, and would be used to offset propane gas and electricity use by supplying heat, electricity, hot water, de-icing, and other beneficial uses for Limelight Hotel facilities.
The Applicant commissioned a study titled Limelight Hotel Geothermal Drilling Study (Geothermal Drilling Study) (Geothermal Resource Group, Inc. [GRG], 2021). As documented in the Geothermal Drilling Study, GRG evaluated the geologic setting and concluded that “geothermal wells drilled on the property have a strong likelihood of achieving the project goals of 85-250 gallons per minute (gpm) of water between 140-175°F”. The Geothermal Drilling Study did not include site-specific drilling, testing or water quality sampling, and did not provide analysis of the potential impacts to the Town’s groundwater resourcesfrom the proposed geothermal well system.
Mammoth Community Water District (MCWD) provides potable water supply to the Town, and groundwater is a significant source, comprising 100 percent of the Town’s supply during summer and fall months and more of the year during drought conditions. The proposed Limelight Hotel project is located in MCWD’s service area and within the area from which MCWD pumps groundwater for drinking water supply. Notably, MCWD-17, a major production well that supplies up to 25 percent of the total groundwater supply, is located between 1,000 and 1,700 feet from the proposed Limelight Hotel project’s proposed geothermal well system.
TM – Mammoth Community Water District
May 25, 2022
{00275225.1} N-C-947-80-20-028-WP-TM-LIMELIGHT
The Town prepared the Limelight Hotel, Addendum to the North Village Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR Addendum) to address the CEQA requirements for the proposed geothermal well system (Town of Mammoth Lakes, 2022). EIR Addendum Section 2.1, Addendum’s Purpose and Need, concludes that no “Substantial changes are proposed in the project, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.” Section 3.8, Hydrology and Drainage states that the proposed geothermal well system “would involve a closed loop system” and goes on to conclude that, “the upper aquifer is the aquifer referenced in the Groundwater Management Plan for the Mammoth Basin Watershed (dated July 2005), and the proposed Modified Project does not utilize or impact such groundwater supplies. Therefore, the Modified Project would not conflict with such groundwater management plan and any potential impacts pertaining to groundwater supplies would be less than significant.” The EIR Addendum also concluded that the addition of the proposed geothermal well system would not require new mitigation measures.
PRIMARY CONCERN
Although the EIR Addendum states that potential impacts to groundwater supplies would be less than significant, neither the EIR Addendum nor the Geothermal Drilling Study provide any evaluation or technical analysis of the potential impacts to the beneficial uses of groundwater resources resulting from the proposed geothermal well system or to support the conclusion that no significant impacts would occur. The proposed geothermal well system would be located in an important groundwater resource area beneficially used for municipal and domestic drinking water supplies and in close proximity to an important MCWD municipal supply well. The proposed project could cause depletion to, or contamination of, the Town’s drinking water supplies.
The primary scientific concern is the potential for the operation of the proposed geothermal well system to degrade groundwater quality. The EIR Addendum and the Geothermal Drilling Study assert, but do not demonstrate with any technical analysis or evidence, that the proposed geothermal reservoir is isolated from the groundwater resource area and the drinking water supply wells within it. The Geothermal Drilling Study notes that both the “shallow reservoir” and the “deeper reservoir” have elevated chloride to boron ratios indicating geothermal influence in both. The Geothermal Drilling Study also points out that the Limelight Hotel project “sits above the Long Valley Caldera ring fracture zone, which is a known conduit for geothermal fluids just to the north.” These faults and fractures may also be conduits for the lateral or vertical movement of mineral-laden geothermal waters or brines into the groundwater resource area used for drinking water supply. The similarity of chloride to boron ratios in water samples from the “deeper reservoir” and the “shallow reservoir” is evidence that these conduits exist and provide pathways for the movement and intermixing of water and geothermal fluids. Connectivity between the “shallow reservoir” and “deeper reservoir” is well documented in the United States Geologic Survey’s Open-File Report 2019-1063 entitled “Hydraulic, Geochemical, and Thermal Monitoring of an Aquifer System in the Vicinity of Mammoth Lakes, Mono County, California, 2015-17.
The proposed project will place new stresses on the Mammoth Basin’s complex hydrologic system.
Operation of the proposed geothermal well system will change the spatial distribution of pressure in the geothermal reservoir. Pressure will decrease near the proposed extraction well and increase near the proposed injection well. These changes in pressure will result in flow gradients towards the proposed extraction well and away from the proposed injection well. Movement of geothermal fluids will occur along conduits subject to flow gradients. As stated above, the geologic and water quality data demonstrate the existence of a connection between the deeper geothermal reservoir and the shallow groundwater aquifer. Therefore, changes in reservoir pressure caused by the proposed geothermal well
TM – Mammoth Community Water District
May 25, 2022
{00275225.1} N-C-947-80-20-028-WP-TM-LIMELIGHT
system have the potential to introduce increased flows of geothermal waters into the potable groundwater supply. This intermixing could cause potentially significant water quality degradation in the groundwater supply, which in turn could cause exceedances of drinking water regulatory standards in public supply wells. In addition, because of the nature of this kind of impact, any significant inducement of contaminated fluids into the water supply aquifer could persist for decades. If the contamination is extreme enough, the quality of the community water supply could be rendered too contaminated to effectively treat to even minimum drinking water standards.
MCWD wells that have geothermal influence (including MCWD-17) have higher concentrations of arsenic, boron, and chloride than other colder-temperature MCWD wells. Data shows that wells with geothermal influence generally have arsenic concentrations about five to forty times greater than colder-temperature MCWD wells.
As of 2018, the average arsenic concentration in MCWD-17 was about 10 times the California and federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 0.010 milligrams per liter (mg/L). To meet drinking water standards, MCWD already must blend high-arsenic waters from MCWD-17 with groundwater from MCWD wells with low-arsenic concentrations and then treat this blended supply to produce water that meets arsenic concentrations below the MCL. The arsenic concentration in the geothermal fluid in the Casa Diablo geothermal well field (the same geothermal reservoir the Applicant proposes to use) is very high (1.0 to 1.5 mg/L, which is 10 to 15 times the arsenic concentration in MCWD-17), and this arsenic is a source of the high arsenic concentrations in MCWD-17. Future increases in arsenic concentrations in MCWD-17 waters due to increases in geothermal fluid intruding into the shallow groundwater aquifer could increase MCWD’s treatment costs and, at some point, could require MCWD to shut down MCWD-17 until MCWD could upgrade the groundwater treatment capacity to handle the increased arsenic concentration, which would be very expensive.
MCWD operates under Permit No. 05-13-14P-014 from the California State Water Resources Control Board – Division of Drinking Water (DDW). Condition 3 of the permit states, “The District shall protect its sources from any encroachment by sanitary hazards. In particular, any new possible contaminating activity (PCA) shall be noted in the Source Assessment”. The proposed geothermal well system is a PCA and construction of the project would likely require an update to the Source Assessment for MCWD-17 and could lead to additional monitoring and treatment requirements from DDW.
If there is a long-term imbalance between the proposed geothermal production and injection, the resulting reductions in pressures in the geothermal reservoir may cause groundwater to seep downwards into the geothermal reservoir. This could cause a drop in the water table in the shallow reservoir and may cause the geothermal fluids in the deeper reservoir to boil and release steam and other gases that could seep upwards through fractures and contaminate the shallow groundwater aquifer used by MCWD. These potential impacts are not hypothetical and have been observed in the nearby Casa Diablo geothermal well field.
The EIR Addendum refers to the proposed geothermal well system as a “closed-loop geothermal well system”. This is misleading. A “closed loop system” is one in which a heat transfer fluid is circulated through a closed-loop of pressure-tight piping underground or submerged in water, and a heat exchanger transfers heat between the refrigerant in a heat pump and the heat transfer fluid in the closed loop.
Although volumetrically equal amounts of geothermal fluids are proposed to be extracted and injected with no net change in the volume of geothermal fluids in the reservoir, it cannot be said that all of the same fluids will be recycled through the system. The proposed extraction well will capture fluids in a threedimensional volume surrounding the well intake. Some of these fluids will originate from the injection well; others will be captured from storage in the surrounding rock comprising the reservoir. Similarly,
TM – Mammoth Community Water District
May 25, 2022
{00275225.1} N-C-947-80-20-028-WP-TM-LIMELIGHT
fluids injected through the proposed injection well will be distributed in the three-dimensional volume around the injection well. Some of these fluids will be captured by the extraction well, while others will move away from the well into the surrounding rock. This means that operation of the proposed geothermal well system will result in a partial recycling of geothermal fluids along with a continual flow of fluids towards the proposed extraction well and away from the proposed injection well along conduits not connected to each well’s respective pair but potentially connected to the potable groundwater of the groundwater resource area. Again, this could result in water quality degradation in the groundwater supply and exceedances of drinking water regulatory standards in public supply wells.
OTHER CONCERNS
CEQA requires projects to prepare and evaluate project alternatives where feasible. The Geothermal Drilling Study states that a true closed-loop heat pump system could be an effective alternative if geothermal fluid temperature and/or permeability do not meet expectations.
The description of the proposed geothermal well system does not describe in any detail the mechanical systems that will be used to heat, cool or generate electricity. The project description does not describe if or what type of heat transfer fluids are proposed.
The Geothermal Drilling Study states that the applicant will need to provide proof of non-interaction with the water supply; however, there is no discussion regarding how this will be accomplished.
CONCLUSION
The EIR Addendum and the Geothermal Drilling Study do not evaluate potential impacts to the beneficial uses of groundwater resources resulting from the Limelight Hotel project’s proposed geothermal well system. Potential water quality impacts to the groundwater resource area and drinking water wells within it could be potentially significant, persistent over many years and very difficult to remediate after they are manifested.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The CEQA analysis should be revised to evaluate the potential effects of the proposed geothermal well system on the groundwater resource area, the beneficial uses of this resource, and the municipal and domestic well infrastructure. The analysis should include the construction, testing and monitoring of test wells to support the impact analysis and the development of a monitoring program.
The CEQA analysis should be revised to consider project alternatives, including true closed-loop systems.
Monitoring and mitigation measures appropriate to the revised analysis should be developed.
Technical studies should be conducted to support a more complete and definitive evaluation of the potential impacts of the proposed geothermal well system on the groundwater resource area, the beneficial uses of this resource, and the municipal and domestic well infrastructure.
TM – Mammoth Community Water District
May 25, 2022
{00275225.1} N-C-947-80-20-028-WP-TM-LIMELIGHT
REFERENCES
Geothermal Resource Group, Inc. 2021. Limelight Hotel Geothermal Drilling Study. June 8.
Town of Mammoth Lakes. 2022. Limelight Hotel, Addendum to the North Village Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report. May 3.
United States Geologic Survey. 2019. Open-File Report 2019-1063 entitled “Hydraulic, Geochemical, and Thermal Monitoring of an Aquifer System in the Vicinity of Mammoth Lakes, Mono County, California, 2015-17.
1 Garrett Higerd
From: Salera, Jerry@DOC <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 5:37 PM
To: Garrett Higerd
Cc: Mark Busby; Wardlow, Charlene@DOC
Subject: RE: Limelight Hotel Geothermal Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Hi Garrett,
I’m sorry I have not been able to respond right away to your email. I did see you called as well and left me 2 voice messages.
With respect to the EIR Addendum and the request for us to support MCWD’s appeal, I think we cannot take a position. We have not received any Notices of Intentions (NOIs) and any accompanying documentation for us to review and evaluate.
In answer to your questions:
• Who is the decision-making body at CalGEM that will make the decision on the permit and file the CEQA Notice of Determination?
I review the application together with my Associate Engineer and the Geothermal Program Manager approves the permit on behalf of the State Oil and Gas Supervisor, the top person in CalGEM.
• When in the process will we be able to review and comment? In the typical process for reviewing and approving drilling permits, we don’t engage the public for comments. We just want to make sure that the proposal conforms/meets our regulations.
However, for the operation of the injection well, we will accept public comments for a certain period during the injection permitting process. As mentioned before, the injection permitting process also involves EPA Region 9 (based in San Francisco).
• How many other geothermal projects are there in the state in such proximity to a community’s drinking water supply? Can you provide examples?
Offhand, I can mention injection projects we have permitted in Susanville (Lassen Co.), Calistoga (Napa Co.) and Alturas (Modoc Co.) where there are USDWs in proximity to the project area. Similarly, in Desert Hot Springs in Riverside Co. we have not permitted any injection but only production wells.
Sincerely,
APPENDIX 2
2 Jerry Salera
Senior Oil and Gas Engineer (Supervisor)
Geothermal Program
CA Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM)
715 P Street, MS 18-03, Sacramento, CA 95814
M: (916) 203-7785
[email protected]
To: Town of Mammoth Lakes and Limelight Mammoth LLC
From: Trevor Wilding, owner of 141 Lakeview Blvd #32, Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 Reason for memo: Discuss concern related to my property and the construction of hotel Date: 5-18-2022
This letter is to voice my concern related to the construction of the 6 story hotel as it relates to the value and environmental impact that I will encounter due to the new build. Concerns that I would like addressed.
1. What impact will there be on the view and the sunlight that my south facing condo receives. This might influence my heating bill.
2. Where will the wells be located on the hotel property. Will the location of the wells and other utilities create noise pollution for my mountain experience?
3. Will the geothermic wells have a seismic impact long term on the foundation and the building structure of my condo?
4. Financially will the value of my condo on a nightly basis be diluted due to the increased number of rental units available in a consolidated location?
5. I am concerned with the unknown unintended consequences that will occur.
Please confirm that you received this email and I would like to have this noted for the record my concerns.
Sincerely
Trevor WIlding
GREAT BASIN UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
157 Short Street, Bishop, California 93514-3537
Tel: 760-872-8211 www.gbuapcd.org
May 31, 2022
Via Electronic Mail
Kimberly Cooke
Senior Planner
Town of Mammoth Lakes
437 Old Mammoth Road
Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546
Subject: Comments on Limelight Hotel California Environmental Quality Act Review Dear Kim,
The Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) is a California regional government agency that enforces federal, state, and local air quality regulations in Alpine, Mono and Inyo counties.
The District is responsible for permitting sources of air pollution including geothermal development projects. The District has reviewed the May 3, 2022, Limelight Hotel California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Addendum to the North Village Specific Plan Environment Impact Report. After an initial review, the District finds that the addendum does not adequately describe the potential air quality impacts or permitting requirements regarding the geothermal component of the Limelight project. The District has provided specific comments below.
Project Description
The project description provided in the addendum does not provide an adequate level of detail regarding the specifics of the geothermal component of the project. Information that should be provided includes, details about the scope, methods and layout of any potential direct geothermal heating system, details regarding the size of any potential geothermal power plant, the type of plant that would be constructed (ex. binary plant using motive fluid or one powered by steam), and details of the power plant design, construction, and operation.
Required Permits and Applicable Rules
District permits are required for geothermal wells and for the geothermal power plant project and are not currently listed or addressed in the addendum. A District secondary source permit is required for the construction of the hotel as well. Additionally, construction projects and geothermal operations are subject to District Rules and Regulations including but not limited to District Rule 401 – Fugitive Dust and Rule 404A–Particulate Matter, and Rule 424 – Geothermal Emissions Standards. District rules are available at https://gbuapcd.org/rules.
Phillip L. Kiddoo
Air Pollution Control Officer
Air Quality Impacts
The addendum and the previous EIR do not adequately describe or quantify the nature or amount of air pollution emissions associated with the geothermal well drilling, construction of the geothermal project, or any emissions associated with ongoing operations. The addendum states, on page 20, that the construction emissions for the geothermal system are temporary and small in magnitude compared to the future buildout without providing any quantitative data supporting this assertion. Geothermal well drilling involves substantial use of heavy equipment, including large diesel engines. The construction activities may be short term, but the emissions may be substantial and should be quantified and evaluated, especially given the proximity of the project to many residences. The addendum also should describe the potential impacts of H2S emissions during well drilling and any plan to monitor and abate these impacts. Lastly, the addendum does not discuss any air quality emissions that may or may not be associated with long term operations of the geothermal development.
The addendum states, on page 20, that the project would not exceed the District significance thresholds for criteria pollutant emissions during the project operations. The District has not developed specific air quality significance thresholds and any environmental review document should correctly identify and describe any utilized thresholds.
The District hopes these comments provide clarification regarding the required air district permitting, applicable air quality regulations, and the information that needs to be provided in an updated or subsequent environmental review for a geothermal development project. Please do not hesitate to contract the District for additional information.
Sincerely,
Ann Logan
Deputy Air Pollution Control Officer
TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Title: Approval of Appropriations Limit, Investment Policy, Debt Policy, Reserve Policy, and Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 22-23
Meeting Date: June 15, 2022
Prepared by: Dan Holler, Town Manager
Rob Patterson, Administrative Services / Finance Director RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council take the following actions:
1. Adopt a resolution establishing the Town of Mammoth Lakes appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 22-23.
2. Adopt a resolution reaffirming the Town of Mammoth Lakes Investment Policy for Fiscal Year 22-23.
3. Adopt a resolution reaffirming the Town of Mammoth Lakes Reserve Policy for Fiscal Year 22-23.
4. Adopt a resolution reaffirming the Town of Mammoth Lakes Debt Policy for Fiscal Year 22-23.
5. Adopt a resolution approving the Annual Budget for the Town of Mammoth Lakes for Fiscal Year 22-32, as presented or with Council directed modifications.
APPROPRIATION LIMIT:
The California Constitution sets limits on the amount of Tax Revenues that may be appropriated by a local government. Each year the Town must adopt a resolution setting the appropriation limit that will be applied in the adoption of the budget. The State provides guidelines for the calculation which allow the limit to be adjusted by defined factors. The Town’s limit is adjusted by the combination of the change in the County population and the California per Capita Income. The population of Mono County increased by .61% and California per capita income changed by 7.55% for a combined adjustment of 8.21% for FY22-23. The appropriations limit for the Town increased from $28,245,641 to $30,563,494. The Town’s appropriation of tax revenues subject to the limit are under the allowed amount.
INVESTMENT POLICY:
Each year the staff reviews the Town’s Investment Policy and has the Council take action to reaffirm the policy and to approve any changes. Over time minor adjustments are made to the policy to better meet the needs of the Town to meet regulatory changes, to adopt best practices or to allow added flexibility in managing the Town’s portfolio. This policy has one update for FY22- 23 based on activity from the previous year and overall cash on hand. The Town invests any excess cash in Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). LAIF is an investment fund offered by the State Treasurer’s Office to municipal governments. The Pooled Money Investment Account
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 2
(PMIA) offers local agencies the opportunity to participate in a major portfolio with professional investment staff at no additional cost. The Town’s current limit per policy is $55M and based on the timing of cash inflow and capital project outflow, the current balance is $58M. The maximum limit allowable for LAIF is $75M and staff is recommending an increase in our policy that matches this limit. No additional changes are necessary for FY22-23.
RESERVE POLICY:
The reserve policy was established several years ago and was based on a percentage of General Fund revenue. Two years ago, when budgeted General Fund revenue was reduced significantly, staff thought it was not prudent to tie reserve to these reduced amounts and established a baseline revenue for the policy. This baseline revenue is reviewed annually based on the growth of General Fund Revenue. For FY22-23 staff has increased the baseline to $27,500,000 and updated the target funding appropriately. While the Operating Reserve was funded to policy during the budget preparation, Reserve for Economic Uncertainty (REU) is under policy by approximately $600,000.
As part of the year-end budget to actuals review and ongoing review, staff is recommending full funding of the REU be a priority use of uncommitted fund balance. The elements of the policy are discussed below.
The Reserve for Economic Uncertainty (REU) was established to minimalize the impact to town services in the event of a long-term revenue shortfall from an economic downturn or other localized event that negatively affects the Town's revenue sources. These localized events could be in the form of a natural disaster that affects the town itself or access to the town. The funding target is 20% of baseline revenue or $5,500,000 for FY22-23. Staff included interest earned from the Mono County Investment Pool for FY21-22, increasing the balance to 4,910,554 through two quarters of FY21-22. Staff will look for an opportunity to allocate excess revenues of $600,000 to REU to bring the Town into compliance with the policy.
Operating Reserve (OR) is engaged to weather short-term economic impacts or to take advantage of unanticipated funding needs such as grant opportunities, response to damaged facilities, unanticipated short-term declines in revenue or new state and federal cost mandates. The funding target is 5% of baseline revenue ($27,500,000) or roughly $1,375,000. This element is fully funded and in compliance with the policy.
Debt Reserve (DR) was established to provide funding to cover the Town’s debts in the event of a long-term revenue shortfall from an economic downturn or other localized event that negatively affects the town's revenue sources. The funding target is 50% of the annual debt service paid by the General Fund. The two bonds that qualify are the Lease Revenue bond for the Police Facility (2015) and the Taxable Judgement Obligation bond for MLLA settlement refinancing (2017). The target funding based on these two obligations is $1,100,000. This reserve is fully funded and in compliance with the policy.
The fourth element of the reserve policy is funding $100,000 to the contingency fund as part of the budgeting process. The contingency reserve is designed to meet smaller unanticipated costs within the operating budget. It may also be used to meet other shortfalls in funding for capital projects. This item was included in the budget development for FY22-23 and is in compliance with the policy.
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 3
DEBT POLICY:
This Debt Management Policy has been developed to provide guidance in the issuance and management of debt by the Town or any other public agency for which the Town Council sits as its legislative body and is intended to comply with Government Code Section 8855(I), effective on January 1, 2017. The main objectives are to establish conditions for the use of debt; to ensure that debt capacity and affordability are adequately considered; to minimize the Town’s interest and issuance costs; to maintain the highest possible credit rating; to provide complete financial disclosure and reporting; and to maintain financial flexibility for the Town.
Debt, properly issued and managed, is a critical element in any financial management program. It assists in the Town’s effort to allocate limited resources to provide the highest quality of service and facilities to the public. The Town desires to manage its debt program to promote economic growth and enhance the vitality of the Town for its residents and businesses.
Staff does not recommend any adjustments to the Debt Policy for FY21-22. Council may amend the policy, as it deems appropriate from time to time in the prudent management of the debt of the Town.
BACKGROUND:
The Budget: A Policy, Financial, Management and Planning Tool The budget is the Town’s financial plan used to achieve policy goals and the established work program the fiscal year through the allocation of financial resources. The budget reflects directed investment in people, equipment, technology, capital projects and service improvements which are managed to achieve Town priorities and policy objectives. The level and scope of services planned out for the current year, with a look to the future needs of the community. Although it is important to express the budget in monetary terms because of the need for a common denominator, a budget should be looked upon as more than a just a set of numbers for the Fiscal Year.
The budget represents public policy incorporating legislative direction and oversite and administrative and legal controls. Budgeting is the process used for organizing human resources, equipment, materials, and other resources necessary to implement public policy directives, legal mandates, provide for public enjoyment and quality of life and to ensure public safety. The resources provided through the budget process is the means to achieve these objectives. The budget is also a management tool as it supports the work program designed to accomplish organizational objectives. The Strategic Priorities of the Town Council are reflected in the budget as are the ongoing provision of core services and enhanced services and programs for residents and guests..
The financial plan incorporated into the budget supports the current the fiscal year requirements, but also looks to maintain future financial stability and investment. This includes setting and funding reserves, managing ongoing costs, and planning for and incrementally funding capital investments. The process incorporates financial plans for major equipment replacement and to maintain and update operational systems. The Budget reflects planning for the operational costs of new facilities, maintenance of capital improvements, and incremental costs of ongoing services.
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 4
The Town’s tourism reliant economy requires planning for invest in public amenities and experiences within our natural landscape in partnership with federal agencies and other partners.
Budgetary Basis
The effective period of a budget is one fiscal year: July 1 to June 30. Certain services and activities are required by law and several revenues are restricted for specific purposes. The budget is organized by “fund”, as the Town utilizes the principles fund accounting to manage financial resources. A fund is a collection of accounts that record resources together with related requirements for a specific type of activity or objective. The Town maintains hundreds of revenue and expenditure accounts within 40 funds.
The budget may be the most important managerial tool available to local government, given that almost everything local government does is reflected in the budget. Virtually all governmental activities are funded through the budget, and budgeting and financial management is a continuous process. This makes the budget an effective tool for public officials, provides effective resource allocation system, and is used at every level of governmental activity.
The budget is prepared on a line-item (account) basis by fund and department using historical trends, outside agency and consultant information, and management experience. A review of each revenue and expenditure is completed in preparing the budget. The Town’s annual operating budget is prepared in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The Town’s accounting system is organized and operated on a fund basis. As previously mentioned, funds are established for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with policy direction, special regulations, or legal restrictions.
All governmental funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting in which revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the fiscal period. Expenditures, except for un-matured interest on long-term debt, are recognized in the accounting period in which the liability is incurred. For example, sales and use taxes are considered “measurable revenue” when they are received by the Town. Revenues earned in the prior fiscal year are considered measurable and available if received by the Town within 60 days after year-end. The accounting records for enterprise and internal service funds are maintained on a full accrual basis. Accordingly, revenues are recognized in the accounting period earned and expenses are recognized in the period incurred. Trust and agency funds are accounted for on a cash basis (these funds are not included in this presentation).
Town Manager Budget Guidelines and Direction
Fiscal Year 2021-22 was a strong financial year for the Town, following the unknown of lingering impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Town returned to near normal operations with a strong surge in visitation and resetting of Town services and programs. Town staffing levels were restored and increases in targeted areas approved.
Department Heads have worked to develop their budgets to reflect the transition back to a healthy financial position and resulting service demands. The budget reflects investments to achieve Town Council Strategic Priorities including funding for the Housing Now! initiative, investments in sustainable recreation partnerships and projects, infrastructure planning and construction,
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 5
community facilities, and enhanced municipal services. The budget continues to reflect a conservative approach in current and long-term operational costs. The approach provides for stable levels of service, investment in capital infrastructure, and the ability to invest in creating a more resilient community.
Budget Assumptions and Direction
The following assumptions and direction were used in developing the FY22-23 Budget:
1. The full funding of the Town’s Reserve for Economic Uncertainty (REU), and Operating Reserve (OR) are to be fully funded per adopted policy. Funding may be provided from uncommitted fund balance.
2. Base General Fund operating budget includes $16.0 Million in base transient occupancy tax (TOT). This reflects a conservative approach to the budgeting this revenue source to allow for ongoing investment in priority capital programs and current service levels.
3. TOT allocation to Tourism, Transit and Housing remained at 18.08%, 6.54%, and 6.54% respectively for FY22-23. Agencies supported receive a flat amount with additional revenues used to meet defined operational programs, capital requirements and to investment in Town priorities such as the Housing Now! initiative.
4. Programs previously funded through the direct allocation of funding to Mammoth Lakes Tourism are included as part of the Town’ budget, including Mammoth Lakes Chamber of Commerce ($300,000). Community/Trail Host program ($100,000), King’s Hockey Marketing ($100,000), and fish stocking ($50,000).
5. Continued allocation of $580,000 for Road rehabilitation and related capital projects supported by reserves.
6. Normal employee costs related to merits or other obligated costs are included, with modifications to salary schedules for general employee associations and non-represented employees supporting 2.5% pay adjustment. The Town is in negotiation with Police Officer Association and Police Supervisory Association and no adjustment for pay was included in FY22-23. If any salary adjustments are negotiated, the budget can be updated during 1st quarter budget review.
7. New Office of Outdoor Recreation is funded including two new positions (Manager and Program Coordinator) and current Trails Manager. The office is funded in part by Measure R, Measure U and the General Fund
8. The Measure R budget includes two projects with one-time funding, $100,000 for SHARPS planning (NEPA) and $350,000 for CRC interior improvements.
The budget includes a robust capital program focused on achieving Town Council Strategic Priorities using a mix of revenues sources. Specific areas are noted and discussed in more detail throughout the budget information provided below. These assumptions and Council direction provide the base for preparing the recommended final budget.
Personnel Adjustments
The FY22-23 Budget reflects minor increases in full-time to meet core service staffing levels. Over the past few years strategic steps have been taken to increase full-time staff and reduce reliance on part-time positions. While this has resulted in a net increase in costs, adjustments have minimized the overall cost increases. In FY22-23, 3.7 full time positions were added, and 3.8 full-time equivalent (FTE) were added as part-time staff. These positions reflect our commitment to
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 6
efficiency noted above but also the successful implementation of critical Town programs like the CRC. The following narratives provide more information on the 3.7 full-time positions added:
The Recreation Supervisor position was scheduled to be filled in the last quarter of FY21-22 in support of the Community Recreation Center. However, this position was delayed to FY22-23, closer to the opening of the facility. As such, the position represents the .7 increase in full-time staff for FY22-23.
In Public Works one Maintenance Worker position was added bringing our winter staffing levels to 12 plus the manager. The number of part-time positions remained at three. The staffing meets the minimum level of 14 maintenance positions for winter operations. One position is shared with the trails program during the summer.
The creation of the Town’s Office of Outdoor Recreation included the manager position in FY21-
22. During the last fiscal year, the Sustainable Recreation Coordinator position, one shared with Mono County, was vacated as the employee took a position within the County. Since this position was a county position and supported financially by the Town and Measure U, it did not count on our existing employee list. However, the work is important for our community so to replace this work effort and support the function of the new department, a position of Outdoor Recreation Coordinator was added to the budget for FY22-23. This position will report to the Office of Outdoor Recreation and is partially funded with a contribution of $75,000 from Measure U.
In engineering an intern was hired in FY21-22 to assist in the summer construction season. The position was targeting specific knowledge of Geographic Information System Mapping (GIS) focus. The position proved to be a strong addition to the engineering team, supporting variously projects and departments with this important skillset. The position was converted from part-time to full-time in January 2022. As it was not present in the budget for FY21-22, it has increased our full-time staff by 1 for the budget comparison.
The overall increase of just over 3.8 FTE part-time positions includes a 0.5 position in Community & Economic Development Department for Planning and Building counter help, 1.8 FTE positions in recreation to support enhanced programing at the Community Recreation Center, and 1.7 FTE positions to support the new department, 100-436 Arts & Culture. This new department will support operations at the Edison Theater, providing staffing during operational hours as well as facility cleaning and maintenance.
More detail on specific cost of labor in each category and every department is provided below in the Labor and Staff section of this report.
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 7
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 8
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 10
Labor / Staff Updates
Labor is the largest expense of the Town’s budget covering salaries, health insurance, comprehensive leave, and retirement expenses. The Town is currently negotiating with the two public safety bargaining units and has made appropriate adjustments based on expected outcomes.
The remaining bargaining units are in the final year of contract with a negotiated contract increase of 2.5% for the final year of the contract. In addition to scheduled salary range increases, some employees earn merit increases, 5% per adjustment, while within the range of their salary. In addition, staff reviews costs increase for certain benefits to make sure anticipated increases are captured during the budget process. All salary adjustments are anticipated and captured within this budget.
In addition to the adjustments noted above, this budget contains funding staff positions that were vacant for most of FY21-22, hired late in fiscal year and new positions requested for service expansion as noted in previous paragraphs on personnel adjustments.
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 11
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 12
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 13
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 14
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 15
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 16
Fund 100 - General Fund
Revenue
The budget revenue projections presented to Council during the tentative budget presentation in May were finalized and all analysis had been completed. Therefore, no adjustments were made to the General Fund Revenue for FY22-23 and the projected revenue is $27,630,890. Below is a summary of key revenue components for the General Fund.
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 17
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 18
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 19
Expenditures
The budget expenditure projections presented to Council during the tentative budget presentation in May were finalized and all analysis had been completed. Therefore, no adjustments were made to the General Fund Expenditures for FY22-23 and the projected expenditure is $27,630,890.
Below is Department Expense Summary for the General Fund.
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 20
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 21
Fund 205 Solid Waste
The Solid Waste Fund accounts for restricted revenues related to providing solid waste related services and programs and was established in FY18-19. The majority of the solid waste programs and services are provided by Mammoth Disposal under a Solid Waste Franchise Agreement. The Fund supports recycling and trash services for Town facilities, Town clean up, and staff time associated with managing the Solid Waste Franchise agreement and services. The renewal of the Solid Waste Franchise Agreement in FY 19-20 adjusted the franchise fees by 4.5% from 5% to
9.5%. Two percent of the increase was retained in the General Fund bringing the total to 7% and
2.5% percent is deposited in the Solid Waste Fund. A previous 2% fee for capital investment was eliminated. The fees deposited here represent an AB939 fee collected under the new franchise agreement and are estimated at $150,000 for FY22-23. AB 939 fees are dedicated to meet recycling mandates by funding facilities and programs to divert waste from landfills and increase recycling efforts.
Fund 210 Gas Tax
Gas Tax was complete during the preliminary budget and therefore had no adjustments from preliminary to final budget.
The Gas Tax Fund is the second largest operating fund following the General Fund. The fund provides for road infrastructure maintenance and snow removal. The revenue for FY22-23 includes $2,168,033 in State Gas Tax funds. This includes the reimbursement for snow removal estimated at $1,750,000. This reimbursement is based on prior year snow removal costs and a portion of this reimbursement is transferred to the various assessment districts, estimated at $100,000 in total.
Since this revenue is based on prior year actual snow removal cost, Fund 210 will see an increase of 16.7% from prior year snow removal revenue. This annual fluctuation in current year expense and subsequent year revenue requires the Town to fund the excess cost of snow removal in heavy snow years. The Fund is supported by a General Fund and Garage Services transfer of $3,091,086 which is 2.6% higher than prior year.
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 22
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 23
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 24
Measure R and U – Restricted Funding
Revenues generated from two voter initiatives commonly referred to as Measure R and Measure U are restricted in use by the language of the initiatives. The Town Council has designated Mammoth Lakes Recreation (MLR) to be the body to take public input on the proposed use of these funds and to make recommendations to Council for consideration. The MLR Board met on May 3, 2022 and held a public hearing to receive public comment and review the proposed budget allocations of Measure R and U funds.
The final budget includes the recommendations provided by MLR. This included ongoing expenses to manage the funds and maintain equipment and facilities secured by Measure R and U expenditures, debt payments and community support. An overview of the recommended budgets by MLR is discussed below.
Fund 215 / 216 – Measure R
Measure R (Fund 216) is budgeted to receive $1,500,000 in Transaction and Use Tax (TUT) revenues for FY22-23. The TUT revenues are similar to a sales tax half percent tax rate was approved under Measure R. The fund has operating expenditures of $610,750 for FY22-23 and includes updates to support recreation in our community. The Community Recreation Center (CRC) is planned to begin operations in FY22-23 and the operational plan includes $112,000 in annual support from Measure R. This support helps reduce the required fees to the public and therefore the affordability of the new center. This amount was budgeted in previous years as $75,000 for CRC operations and $37,000 park maintenance (Trails End and Whitmore). The Town is absorbing the additional cost of maintenance at these parks in order to release these funds to support the CRC operations. The budget includes $25,000 in support for the new Outdoor Recreation Manager position. This position is assigned as the primary Town staff support working with Mammoth Lakes Recreation. The budget includes $90,500 for the contract with Mammoth Lakes Recreation to fund operations for FY22-23. The transfer to Fund 215 Trails was decreased by $100,000 to $250,000 in the current budget with $100,000 being transferred to the General Fund in support of the salary and benefit expense of the Trails Manager. In prior years, Fund 215 Trails supported these expenditures and a $350,000 transfer provided funding for that support.
With this adjustment, the net support for both Trails and Trail Manager remain the same, but the funding structure has changed for simplification. The remainder are annual ongoing expenses that were previously approved by Mammoth Lakes Recreation as the recommending body for this measure.
In addition to the annual ongoing expenses, staff requested two one-time funding items from Measure R that require a planned use of fund balance. This occurs when the expenditures are budgeted to exceed the revenue for the year, thereby expending existing fund balance to cover those expenditures. Both requests were presented to MLR on 5/3/2022 and were approved for the FY22-23 budget. The first item is $100,000 for Sherwin Area Trails and Trailhead Project. These funds will support environmental work planned in partnership with the Inyo National Forest and for trails and trailheads in the Sherwins. The Forest Service has placed the completion of the NEPA process in their plan of work for the coming Federal Fiscal year. Once complete, the Town will be able to proceed with trail construction in the coming years. The second request is an allocation of $350,000 for CRC interior improvements. Plans for the CRC included minimal funding to complete the interior space. The Town has already supported the improvement with $350,000
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 25
from the General Fund. This work includes building out the concession and rental areas, offices, rubberized flooring, and community space/storage.
In October 2017, the Town acquired $5.5 million in debt secured by Measure R for construction of a multi-use facility. The annual payment for this 10-year bond is based on a payment schedule and includes $615,747 for FY22-23. This payment is made from Measure R proceeds bringing total expenditures for Measure R Fund 216 to $1,237,983. The budget will show a deficit due to the approved use of fund balance as noted.
Measure R Trails (Fund 215) receives a transfer of $250,000 for trail construction that is allocated staff full-time and part-time trails construction staff, operating expenses, contractual
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 26
services and projects. As mentioned earlier, this amount was reduced by $100,000 for FY22-23 as was a transfer of $100,000 that previously came out of the fund. The net funding available for trail construction and planning remains at $250,000.
With the creation of the new General Fund department 467 – Office of Outdoor Recreation, many of the trails administrative expenses have been moved to this new department. The only remaining labor expense in this fund is used primarily for trail construction and planning. This includes an allocation of full-time public works maintenance worker who is allocated for the summer and a crew of part-time employees.
Fund 217 – Measure U
Measure U is projected to receive $880,000 in Utility User Tax charges for FY22-23. This increase ($10,000) from the revenue budgeted for FY21-22. The breakdown in revenue is as follows:
Operating expenses for FY22-23 are estimated at $364,470. The budget for transit services increased by $5,000 due to higher operating costs. Previous allocations of $8,400 in unused programming funds were returned to Measure U and are included in the operating budget. These funds are being used to support arts and culture programming, in addition to the $11,600 that was not allocated in FY21-22, resulting in the FY22-23 programming amount to be increased from
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 27
$166,000 to $186,000. The allocation of $300,000 for future MACC expenses continues to be reflected in the budget analysis. The draft expenses include $15,000 to assist with the reopening of Edison Hall. The Town is in discussions with the Mammoth Lakes Foundation to provide the necessary support to have Edison Hall reopened for Summer 2022 programming. The funding will offset a portion of the costs to be incurred by the Town in leasing and managing the facility for community use and production of arts and cultural programming.
Previous funding of $75,000 for the Eastern Sierra Sustainable Recreation Coordinator position is retained in the budget to support a similar position within the Office of Outdoor Recreation. As a Town only position (previous position was shared with Mono County) the compensation for the position will be adjusted, reflecting the loss of county funding and modified job duties. These funds would be transferred to the General Fund in support of the Office of Outdoor Recreation and this position is anticipated to be filled in July 2022. The General Fund will continue to support a portion of the Outdoor Recreation Coordinator position. An amount of $25,000 is again requested to support the Outdoor Recreation Manager position which was filled as of June 6, 2022. The special project allocation is funded at $25,000 to match prior years. For the past couple of years, the planned operational funding of $300,000 for the future Mammoth Arts and Cultural Center (MACC) has been set aside to represent the anticipated operations costs incurred once the facility is operational. Funds have been used to support other one-time projects. Measure U has also committed $2.5M of fund balance for the construction of the facility. The MLR Board was previously presented a revised MACC facility focused on bringing project costs down. The new concept is being vetted with local user groups and based on input received the plan will need to be revised and reviewed one more time before additional design work is started. An additional funding amount of $100,000 is requested to revise the plan with additional detail to develop a new construction cost estimate and timeline. The Mammoth Lakes Foundation (MLF) is taking the lead on this work. Measure U is projected to generate available fund balance of $115,530 from annual revenue over expenditures.
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 28
Fund 218 – Tourism Business Improvement District (TBID) The TBID fund projections include revenues of $6,449,500 for FY22-23. These numbers were calculated in conjunction with Mammoth Lakes Tourism analysis on years prior to the pandemic.
The TBID account is a pass-through account, and the majority of these funds are transferred to Mammoth Lakes Tourism for marketing, advertising, promotion and MLT administration costs.
The Town is budgeted to receive 2% of the revenue for collection and administration costs ($128,990). The revenue performance will be slightly less than the current fiscal year, mainly due to Average Daily Rates in the lodging category, similar to the TOT performance. The fund is not expected to reach the high levels achieved prior to the new agreement and TBID master plan which excludes TBID for the sales of annual passes. Ski lift tickets and ski school revenue are still included in the TBID revenue expectations for Ski Area category.
Airport Operational Fund (220)
The Airport continues to work on expansion of charter service and other expansion opportunities after the commercial service was moved to Bishop in December of 2021. Advanced Air had a successful initial season of scheduled charter flights, and the Town looks to expand on these services through strategic planning on routes and coverage. The charter service does not provide as much revenue opportunities for the airport and the core airport leadership team is working on expanded revenue opportunities. For FY22-23, the Town continues to rely on FAA CARES grant
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 29
funding to support operations, with a shift to greater contribution from the General Fund in order to reduce reliance on these operational grants in the near future. By contributing more from General Fund, staff will extend the grant period while slowly reintroducing the support needs to the General Fund budget.
The expenditure budget for FY22-23 has some increases based on core management team and changes to leadership structure. The airport now has a deputy airport manager full time which is an increase over our previous management charging 50% of time to the airport and 50% to capital projects, primarily housing. In addition to the labor costs, the core team is working with a consultant to develop staff and improve operational excellence in meeting FAA requirements. This consultant will help in the strategy and vision of the airport as it transitions into the next phase of programming and development. Below is the planned expenditure which should increase as capital projects costs are applied.
Staff received notification from the FAA that our ARFF / SRE building had been approved for FAA entitlement funding for FY22-23. Staff has adjusted both revenue and expenditures to reflect the inclusion of this project in work plans for FY22-23. This adjustment increased expense by $461,000 and increased revenue by $445,000 with the difference reflective of match requirements.
The result of this change is a planned use of fund balance (Airport Capital) of $44,867.
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 30
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 31
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 32
Fund 240 – Long Valley
This is a small fund and receives minimal revenue from private use of the “pit” for disposal of clean fill material. The pit is located near the Airport and receives clean fill material used to rehabilitate the site, as it was previously a site from which material was removed. The Town has also been working with the Forest Service on the removal and use of old asphalt grindings that were placed in the pit. The removal of this material assists with remediation of the site. Revenues are budgeted at $26,000 with expenditures of $3,000.
Fund 245 – Housing Programs
The Housing Program fund has been used for several years to track grant funding for first time buyers and Mammoth Lakes Housing buy back program for deed restricted properties. In FY20- 21, staff adjusted the fund to include other housing programs and has recommended that all housing related allocations be transferred to this fund for better tracking. Staff and Town Council have focused on transferring all available resources to this fund in support of our Housing Now! initiative. This is usually done during the quarterly budget presentation and is therefore not a part of the budgeted revenue for the account. Staff has included $842,232 as a transfer in from Tourism and Housing TOT allocation. As the budgets were developed for Fund 100-445 – Housing Programs, and 100-480 – Tourism, staff allocated TOT revenue to these funds at the normal rates of 6.58% and 18.08% respectively. Expenses for the department were set based on contractual obligations, as established by Town Council, some staff allocation and minor customary expenses.
The remaining revenues were committed to the Housing Now! initiative and transferred into Fund 245. Staff expects future contributions to this fund if the Town continues to see revenues in excess of budget for ongoing housing programs.
There are a number of housing projects and programs planned for the coming year. The majority of these programs are outlined in the capital improvement plan under Affordable Housing (AF) as project ID. Since the funds to support these programs are being accumulated in fund 245, they will either be appropriated directly from the fund or transferred to capital projects to support construction. The budget for FY22-23 reflects a planned use of fund balance as these projects are funded by funds accumulated FY21-22 or prior. In total, planned expenditures for fund 245 are $8,735,000 reflecting a planned use of fund balance of $7,719,768 for housing programs.
Fund 250 – Local Transportation Commission – LTC
This fund is used to account for revenues and work program as approved by the Local Transportation Commission. The Town anticipates receiving $75,000 in revenues and has appropriated the full amount to implement the approved LTC work program for FY22-23. This commission can be instrumental in securing funds for larger projects within the region.
Capital Projects Fund (300)
The Town of Mammoth Lakes Public Works Department currently has several capital improvement projects underway. Funds to support those projects come from a variety of state and local sources. It has been described that the Town does not have a typical approach to funding our CIP and MMP work. As an example, we have no annual General Fund source for CIP projects.
The work is pursued based on fund availability as it changes every year. A stated goal of the Department is to do enough work that should funding become available, we are prepared to
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 33
proceed expeditiously. The Town does typically budget approximately $580,000 each year to improve our roads and infrastructure. This is sometimes carried over to a future year to enable the design and construction of a larger project. Below is a summary of the planned FY22-23 projects as presented with the 5-year CIP presentation on May 4, 2022.
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 34
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 35
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 36
TOML – MLH Partnership Projects (AF2)
The Town has four partnership programs with Mammoth Lakes Housing (MLH). MLH serves as a subrecipient of Town awarded CDBG or HOME Funds used for down payment assistance. The Town has as Deed Restriction Preservation program currently funded at $600,000 to be used by MLH or the Town to buy back deed restricted units should a qualified buyer not be found within the allowed time frames.
The program is funded primarily from in-lieu fees collected from new development projects. Staff is recommending program funding be increased to $750,000 in FY22-23 using current in-lieu fees. Mono County also sets aside $300,000 for this program. The increase in funding is reflective of efforts to increase the number of deed restricted ownership units. The Town has committed $1.5 million to support the 11-unit affordable housing Access Apartment Project located at 238 Sierra Manor Road. Under the State’s Homekey program, the Town has committed $1 million to a local project to create 15 units of affordable housing. The Town is also the co-applicant on grants to support these projects. Mono County also committed funds to the Homekey project.
Revolving Loan Fund (Deed Restriction Preservation FY21-22 Allocation $600,000 Requested Allocation Increase for FY22-23 (In-lieu fees) $150,000 Total (funds are held in trust and agency account): $750,000 Access Apartments (238 Sierra Manor Road) FY21-22 Budget Allocation: $1,500,000 Homekey Project FY21-22 Budget Allocation $1,000,000
60 Joaquin Rd – Four New Housing Units (AF3)
Town acquired the vacant 0.20-acre site at 60 Joaquin Road in the Sierra Valley Sites in summer-2021. The Town Council authorized a contract with the selected Design-Build entity, MMI Consulting LLC, in April 2022 and the Town is looking forward to kicking off the project in Spring 2022. The project will provide four (4) for-sale units in two (2) duplex buildings that will be available to households earning up to 120% of the area median income (AMI). Per the schedule provided by the Design-Build entity, construction is scheduled to begin in late Summer 2022 and be completed in late Summer 2023. A rendering of the project as proposed is below. The final design is subject to the Town’s typical entitlement process.
Carryover Budget Allocation for 60 Joaquin FY21-22: $2,700,000
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 37
Parcel Infrastructure Grant (AF4)
The Town and the Parcel Development Partner (Pacific West Communities) were awarded a $20.6 million Infill Infrastructure Grant (IIG) from the California Department of Housing and Community Development. The use of these funds will extend over several years as the Parcel is built out. The funding will be used for public and private infrastructure to support this affordable housing project. Build out is planned to include a minimum of 450 housing units. Phase I (81 units) is under construction and Phase II is in the approval process (see details below). The Capital Budget carries the grant funding over time and actual use of the funds will depend on construction schedules. The FY21-22 budget allocated $7.5 million with remaining funds extending out over the 5-year capital plan.
Carryover Budget FY21-22:$7,500,000
Budget Allocation FY22-23:$3,500,000
Parcel Phase 2 (AF7)
Staff and the development team at Pacific West Communities have completed preliminary design work on the second phase of the Parcel.
At this time, the project is envisioned to include 146 affordable units consisting of a mix of studio, 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, and 3-bedroom rental units, plus 2 manager units (148 total units). The project is in the entitlement process with the intention of having it ready to submit for grant funding summer 2022. The probable funding sources are well known, and an estimate of the Town’s contribution has been based on these opportunities. The current estimated Town participation for Phase II is $5,032,000 million. The Town has been set aside $2.2M and $1.4M will be in the form of a long-term note for land purchase. Over the course of FY22-23 and the close out of FY21-22, additional funds of $1,432,000 will be identified to fully fund the commitment.
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 38
Creative Housing Initiative – Five Workforce Housing Units/Two Town Units (AF8) Under the Town’s Bridge program five housing units were purchased for the purpose of making the units available to households earning up to 120% of the area median income (AMI). The funding provides a “bridge” for our local workforce to move from renting to homeownership. This program has the added benefit of previous rental units being available. A four-bedroom unit in San Joaquin Villas complex and a three-bedroom room unit in the Meridian Court complex are set to close escrow in FY21-22. A two-bedroom unit in LaVista Blanc and two 1-bedroom units in the Meridian Court complex have been purchased and are available for purchase by qualifying households.
The Town also provided down payment assistance for the two units in escrow. Down payment assistance is provided from miscellaneous funding within the Housing Now! initiative program. Proceeds from the sale of these units are placed back in the program. Over time these funds will be diminished due to the affordable selling price. The Town has also acquired two-studio units to assist Town and other agency partners in transitioning employees to the region. The Town owns a one-bedroom unit and two, two-bedroom units used to assist employees moving to the area. The goal of the program is to provide 8-10 households with affordable home ownership.
Bridge Program Allocation FY22-23 $1,400,000.
Private Sector Partnership (AF9)
The Town is in active discussions with private sector partners on the development of a six-unit condo complex. The complex would be restricted to local workforce tenants. The concept is to structure the housing with a lease(s) to local employers to support the financing of the project along with a Town grant. A regulatory agreement will be in place to cap maximum lease amounts and to address the potential future sale of the units. Employers may further subsidize rents to secure housing for their employees. If the partners and agreements are satisfactory to all, the project could proceed to construction in FY22-23 with a 16 +/- month construction schedule.
Total funding is recommended at $1,000,000.
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 39
Aircraft Rescue & Fire Fighting (ARFF)/Snow Removal Equipment Building (AP2) Mammoth Yosemite Airport currently leases a hangar from the Fixed Based Operator to house its ARFF and snow removal equipment.
The hangar does not have adequate space to house all of the equipment and therefore much of the equipment is stored outside. The project will provide adequate storage for equipment and will enhance airport safety by providing adequate ARFF support rooms and increase ease of access and response times to any airport incident. This project includes a new 7-bay equipment building with apron for vehicles and an access road. NEPA and CEQA have both been completed for the proposed project. The Town requested a FY2022 Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant for design and plans. This work will facilitate a request for a construction grant in FY2023 to use AIP and discretionary funds. The town also plans to use airport capital improvement plan funds to fund one of the bays that is not AIP eligible. The cost estimate for design is $491,000 and construction is $7,254,000. Construction is dependent on receiving AIP funding.
Budget Allocation of FAA Grant and Airport Construction Reserves for ARFF Building FY22-23: $491,000 AIP Grant Funding request for 23/24: $6,904,000
Town Public Works Yard Fuel Island Upgrade/Replacement (GF6) The future upgrade and replacement of the Town’s fueling system at the Public Works Yard (or Corporation Yard) is scheduled to be upgraded and relocated to improve overall use and circulation with the Yard. The first phase is the purchase and placement of above ground fuel tanks. The existing underground tanks will be removed as part of a future project along with the relocation of the Fuel Island.
The current fuel island will continue to be used for the interim period of time. The projected project cost for Phase 1 is $600,000 with funding set aside in FY21-22. The project work will be initiated in FY22-23, however ordering of new tanks may be completed in FY21-
22. Total project costs will be higher and additional funding will need to be allocated.
Budget Allocation for Fuel Island Upgrade FY22-23: $600,000
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 40
Communication System (GF8)
The Town of Mammoth Lakes is working with regional partners to upgrade the 30-year-old communications system. The Town is setting aside funding to support the implementation of a new system. The final cost of a new system is expected to cost upwards of $1.5M.
Currently $1,250,000 has been set aside for the project. Setting aside funding when available to the Town will mitigate the financial impact of upgrading the system. Staff is recommending an additional $125,000 be set aside with the potential need for additional funding of $125,000 for full project. The current analysis supports integration of communication systems with the planned State system. The California Radio Interoperable System (CRIS) Program was established in 2019 as part of a strategic effort to leverage the more advanced radio technology available on the market today and to put a more robust and effective communication tool at the disposal of California’s first responder community. The key features of the CRIS will be a Project 25 compliant trunked radio system which interfaces to similar local systems throughout the state of California. When fully developed the CRIS will provide radio coverage to over 90% of the State’s population and over 60% of the State’s geographic footprint.
Current Budget Communication System FY21-22: $1,250,000 Budget Addition for FY22-23: $125,000
Mammoth Arts and Cultural Center (MACC) (GF9)
The establishment of the Mammoth Arts and Cultural Center (MACC) in the Town of Mammoth Lakes has been under consideration for several years. The plan concept plan has included a performing arts theatre, a smaller outdoor amphitheater, use of Edison Hall (theatre),
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 41
storage/workshop space, parking, and other ancillary uses. The concept plans have gone through several iterations. The location for the MACC is on property (Approx. 8 acres) owned by the Mammoth Lakes Foundation (MLF). Aligning the scope of the project with realistic funding availability has been challenging. Over the past year Town staff have re-engaged with the Mammoth Lakes Foundation to evaluate options to achieve a viable project and take advantage of new opportunities. This process has been under discussion in different forms for several years. The concept design for a new performing arts auditorium integrated with the existing Edison Hall was prepared. The concept achieved a more realistic project that is being refined to ensure the facility will meet the existing and expansion needs of most current users and serve new opportunities. Accordingly, the concept plan will need funding for additional refinement a request of $100,000 from Measure U is recommended for FY22-23. The design includes the addition of separate 1,000+/- square foot workshop/storage building.
The has committed up to $300,000 annually for operation and maintenance funding from Measure U. The design and construction of the facility will be managed by the Mammoth Lakes Foundation.
Funding sources for the new Performing Arts Auditorium and Edison Renovation project include:
Measure U Capital funding reserves of $2.5 M. Funding is split between FY22-23 and FY23-24 ($1M and $1.5M) Measure U Design Update Funding FY22-23: $100,000 – Included in Fund 217 Operating Budget Non-Town capital funding includes:
Kern Community College District (local bond measure) funding of $7,500,000 Private donor funding commitments in excess of $2,000,000 supporting arts and culture The project will require additional funding with estimated costs to be refined as part of the final concept design work.
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 42
Edison Hall Improvements (GF11)
Mammoth Lakes Foundation (MLF) is proceeding with needed improvements to Edison Hall. The Town and MLF looking at options to partner with the Town to take on operational support to meet the goal of opening the Edison Hall for summer 2022 programming.
Staff requested $100,000 to support access updates to parking for ADA, minor parking lot maintenance and design work for future storage/workshop space and any minor improvements to the facility needed for operations.
Budget for Edison Hall FY22-23: $100,000
Foundation Childcare Facility (GF12)
Several factors have come together creating an opportunity to provide expanded childcare services. The need for expanded childcare and early child education services has been expressed by individuals, businesses, and local service agencies. With relocation of the IMACA preschool to the Parcel and Mono County Office of Education (MCOE) taking on operations and the obligated removal of IMACA facility at the High School, new opportunities for childcare were presented. Staff has reached out to Mammoth Unified School District (MUSD) regarding the repurposing of portable classrooms that are to be disposed of by MUSD as part of the High School Remodel. Staff is looking at 6+/- buildings to create a childcare early child education facility on the MLF property. The project is time constrained due to the need remove the modular buildings at the High School by end of June 2023. One additional modulars is planned to be used for the workshop/storage building to support the performing arts auditorium. The final product will be dependent on budget and costs but will need to include an appropriate outdoor play area. The funding set aside will be used to cover design, permits, building relocation, foundation construction, inside improvements and limited outside improvements. Funding will be used to complete CEQA work for all project associated with the Mammoth Lakes Foundation projects. Staff has initiated a request for qualifications for an architectural firm to allow the project to move forward timely.
Budget for Childcare Facility FY22-23: $1,650,000
Snow Storage Improvements (GF13)
The Town currently manages a Use Permit with USFS for snow storage. The terms of this permit are not favorable to the Town and costs associated with contracting services are unsustainable. The Town will continue to work with the Inyo National Forest on the use of land for snow storage. The need for adequate snow storage continues to be a critical factor in managing snow for public safety and keeping the Town open during storm events. The need for the larger Forest Service site will continue and the Town will keep the use permit in place. Town staff has been looking at less costly alternatives for snow storage, as higher costs are ultimately passed on to local businesses and residents. The availability of private land in the Town for this purpose is very limited. Vacant land owned by MLF has the potential to be used on a short-term basis for a limited snow storage area (5+/- acres). The longer-term vision for the property is for housing. The terms of the contract on the use of the site will provide a lower cost option to the Town, while maintaining service for the community. The vacant acreage will accommodate much of the Town’s snow storage demand. The requested funding would be used to develop secure access to the site. The use of the site is subject to completing agreements and the environmental analysis.
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 43
Budget for Snow Storage Access Improvements FY22-23: $50,000 Civic Center – Town Hall (GF14)
Staff have recently reported that the costs of leasing the current town offices have increased significantly. Staff is investigating constructing a new Town Hall. The Town owns the land on the NE corner of Tavern and Sierra Park. This property was acquired for the purpose of building a civic center including a Town Hall and other municipal functions. A courthouse, police station, and County administrative building have already been completed. The proposed budget set aside will cover the initial programming and design work needed to understand the costs of the facility. An RFQ/RFP has been issued to qualified architects to assist in the development of these documents. Staff anticipates completing this work in late summer in order to provide Council with an accurate picture of the costs to construct a new facility and the financial plan. The proposed funding source is American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding. Funding for new Town Offices would be through a debt issuance. The project will proceed in measured steps, with the first step to develop a space needs plan, a general facility, plan, a rough cost estimate and timeline. Use of funding allocation is $150,000 for initial work.
Budget allocation for Town Hall FY22-23: $1,900,000
Parcel Childcare and Park at the Parcel (GF16(a) and PR12) Phase I of the Parcel includes approximately 2700 square feet of space for childcare and 0.8 acres of space for a public park. The park is split between dedicated childcare space and community park area. The childcare space is being designed to include the pre-school services which will be relocated from the current High School site. The childcare space is planned to be in use year-round. The space will accommodate 25-30 children. The funding for the outdoor area and tenant improvements includes a Town contribution of $250,000 and the use of childcare DIF revenue of $160,000 for total funding of $410,000. The final cost of improvements has not been determined, with additional funding necessary. The community park has initial funding of $268,000 from a CARES Act CDBG grant to purchase playground and other equipment. The full build out of the community park will require additional funding estimated at $700,000.
Budget Allocation for FY22-23 Childcare (GF16a): $250,000 Recommended us of Childcare DIF Revenue (GF16): $160,000 Community Park Grant Funding Allocation (PR12): $268,000 Community Recreation Center (CRC) & Mobility Hub (PR1, PR1a, PR2) Located at Mammoth Creek Park the proposed Community Recreation Center or CRC will be a fabric tensile structure enclosing an Olympic size ice rink that will operate from November to April, and in the summer, durable sport tiles are envisioned to cover the rink area creating a 20,000 sq. foot Mammoth RecZone. Combined with community driven and professionally branded programming, the year-round community recreation center will be the recreation destination that the entire community and our many visitors to Mammoth Lakes will enjoy. The project will include an expanded parking area with 118 spaces. Mobility elements such as a transit pull-out and shelter, clean air and electric vehicle parking, and bike parking will be included in the new lot. On February 17, 2021, the Town Council
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 44
awarded the construction contract to Hamel Contractors Inc. At the same meeting the Council authorized staff to purchase the Sprung Structure, Chiller, and other appearances. Finally budget adjustments were authorized to complete the associated parking lot and mobility elements.
Current CRC Budget: $15,659,421
Mobility Hub Budget Allocation: $1,580,000
Interior Improvements Allocation: $700,000
Parks Deferred Maintenance and Improvements (PR3)
For the past few years Council has allocated up to $300,000 per year to address deferred maintenance projects within our parks and recreation amenities. The FY21-22 funding will be used to update ballfields at Whitmore Park. With the construction of new CRC facility, the current agreement with Mammoth Unified School District (MUSD) requires the current Ice Rink and associated improvements to be removed and the site remediated. The funding allocation of $100,000 under Parks Maintenance and Improvements is planned to be used for this purpose, with an option to use the funding to repurpose the space for other passive recreational uses. A request has been made to the MUSD board to amend the existing lease agreement to allow for the old ice rink slab to be converted into
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 45
2 pickle ball courts,1 tennis court, and other passive uses. Decommissioning elements of the ice rink has commenced. Pending a new agreement with the MUSD the old rink will be removed or repurposed for ongoing recreational uses.
Budget for Parks Deferred Maintenance (Ice Rink) FY22-23: $100,000 Dog Park and Expanded Parking (PR7 & PR7a)
The Town is also looking at locations for the development of a Dog Park. Currently, the Town does not have places that are designed for off-leash dog play areas. Our local parks and sports fields have become used for this purpose resulting in several gallons of dog waste being removed from these facilities. Dogs are also often allowed to run off leash within the park and sprots fields in violation of Town code.
Having a dedicated space for this purpose meets community need for a place allowing dogs to run/play off leash, socialize and increases the norm for users of the dog park to pick up after their pets. The Town has received a $50,000 T-Mobil grant and previously allocated an additional $100,000 for a dog park. The current plan is to use a portion of MLF vacant property for a temporary dog park location. The longterm land use plan for the site is for housing. Property is also available for expanded parking of 40+/- spaces to support other uses such as the Theatre, Dog Park, area MUPs, future amphitheater space and long-term housing. Parking area may include EV charging stations..
Budget allocation for Dog Park FY21-22: $150,000
Budget request for Dog Park FY22-23: $50,000
Budget request for expanded parking FY22-23: $400,000
Old Mammoth Road Landscaping (SS1)
This project includes rehabilitation of existing irrigation and installation of new drip irrigation where necessary, installation of pavers and concrete in existing dirt strips to reduce overall planting area, installation of drought-resistant plantings at select locations (primarily at intersections), and placement of serval annual planter boxes along the length of the road. These planter boxes will be removed and stored for the winter. Estimated total project cost is $1,300,000, to be split between phases. Total current available funding is $630,000. Phase 1 involves all irrigation work and select planting areas and a portion of the planter boxes, with an estimated cost of $500,000. Funding is from the Old Mammoth Road Benefit Assessment District. Additional funding will be necessary to complete Phase 2. Plantings will be in accordance with water restrictions.
Budget Allocation for Old Mammoth Road Landscaping Budget FY22-23: $500,000 West Side
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 46
East Side
Main Street Landscaping (SS2)
This project includes rehabilitation of existing irrigation and installation of new drip irrigation where necessary, and installation of seed mix and drought-resistant plantings along both sides of Main Street from Mountain Blvd to just past Old Mammoth Road. Estimated project cost for phase 1 construction is $250,000. Due to anticipated water restrictions, the project will be phased to reduce quantity of plantings and water demand, with a limited number of drought resistant, native plants planned for the fall.
Main Street Landscaping Budget FY21-22: $200,000
Additional Funding for FY22-23: $50,000
North Side
South Side
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 47
Trail and Municipal Signage (SS3)
The updating, repair and installation of new signage is an ongoing program of work. The Capital Budget allocates $25,000 for the program. This level of work is not generally a defined capital project, but the program provides ongoing dedicated maintenance funding as a priority. The program is coordinated between the Office of Outdoor Recreation and Public Works. While noted in the CIP the funding is allocated in the Office of Outdoor Recreation.
Budget Allocation Trail & Municipal Signage FY22-23: $25,000 Winter Animation and Decorations (SS4)
In 2019, the Town worked with a holiday decoration company to produce and install a sample of 3-foot and 5-foot snowflakes along Old Mammoth Road and Main Street. This served as a test to ensure that the snowflakes would withstand the harsh weather and fulfill the Town’s vision. The test was successful, and therefore expansion of this program is proposed. The scope includes installation/removal of snowflakes by a contactor each year and the purchase of additional 5-foot snowflakes in fiscal year 2022/23.
Budget Carry-over from 21-22: $65,000
2021 Street and MUP Rehabilitation Project (ST1)
The 2021 Street and MUP Rehabilitation Project Includes rehabilitation of the numerous roads and MUP’s. The locations were determined using data collected and entered into the Town’s Street Saver Database. This software evaluates the Towns Pavement Condition Index for each and identifies the best treatment options to improve the overall condition index for the Town. These outputs are evaluated and confirmed with field visits from the Street Maintenance Department. Staff is working with utility companies to provide an opportunity to make repairs/upgrades while the road is open. The following road segments are scheduled to receive treatments.
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 48
Road / MUP Segment Treatment
Mountain Blvd Sierra to Main Street
Pulverize 10” AC pavement/native w/ cement powder and recompact, HMA
3.5”
Commerce Circle Complete Loop Cold plane 2.5”-3.5” and recompact base, HMA 5.5” Majestic Pines Rd Meridian Blvd to Kelly Rd Pulverize 10” AC pavement/native w/ cement powder and recompact, HMA
3.5”
Monterey Pines Rd Southerly E-W section Cold plane 3.5” AC Pavement, crack seal & crack membrane. HMA 3.5”
1. Red Fir Rd Entire Length Cold plane 3.5” AC Pavement, crack seal & crack membrane. HMA 3.5” North Meridian Blvd. MUP As shown on map Complete Reconstruction Town Loop MUP Segments As shown on map Complete Reconstruction Work on the project began in late summer of 2021. Work on Majestic & Monterey Pines, Mountain Blvd and Red Fir will continue in July of 2023 as well as some punch list work on the MUPs.
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 49
2021 STREET AND MUPS REHABILITATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 50
Bluffs Slurry Seal Project (ST11)
This project is funded by the Bluffs Assessment District. The placement of a slurry seal on the roads within the district will extend the life of the payment. The project was bid in FY21-22 will be completed based upon weather and access to materials.
Budget for Bluffs Slurry Seal (STIP Funds) FY21-22: $91,000 Chaparral Road Extension (ST13)
This project will extend Chaparral Road into the Parcel connecting it with the Parcel Phase 1 street network to allow for flow of traffic, transit, and pedestrians. The project includes underground utilities, sidewalks, MUPs, transit stops and related infrastructure for a complete street. The projected cost is $1,600,000. The cost estimate will be refined with final design. The project is planned to go to bid in 4th quarter FY21-22, with construction starting FY22-23. Funding for the project is from the Mono County allotment of SB1 Funds.
Budget Allocation of SB1 Funds provided to the Town for FY22-23: $1,600,000 Laurel Mountain Infrastructure (Street Rehab, Sidewalks, Storm Drain, Streetlights) (SW1) Project is located on Laurel Mountain Rd in the Town of Mammoth Lakes. The project limits are Main Street (SR203) and Sierra Nevada Road, with the southerly 575 feet to be constructed by a private developer. Improvements include sidewalk on the east side of the road, streetlights, curb and gutter, bike lanes, storm drain, sewer extension, pedestrian flashing beacon, and pavement reconstruction. This project
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 51
will serve the new Parcel development and the existing residents. The project will be designed to work with and complement the new development at the Parcel, recently constructed Main Street sidewalks, the new transit shelter across from Laurel Mountain Rd on Main Street, and the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) crosswalk upgrades. The project has a mix of funding sources, and estimated cost for the Town’s portion of the project is $2,485,000. This will be a multi-year and phased project.
Budget Allocation Laurel Mountain Infrastructure FY22-23: $2,485,000 Minaret Road Multi-Use Path (TR1)
The proposed Minaret Road multi-use path (MUP) will be located on the west side on Minaret Road from Lake Mary Road to Old Mammoth Road. The proposed 7200 LF The proposed Minaret Road multi-use path (MUP) will be located on the west side on Minaret Road from Lake Mary Road to Old Mammoth Road. The proposed 7200 LF of path will connect the Old Mammoth Road MUP to the Lakes Basin Path MUP along Minaret Rd and other existing and future pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The Minaret Road MUP Project will construct a Class I MUP that is physically separated from the roadway and provides for additional non-motorized modes of travel. The project will include signage and wayfinding, drainage improvements, and intersection lighting as needed. The alignment of the MUP may require additional intersection improvements at Minaret and Meridian. A round-a-bout is being looked at as a solution to remedy pedestrian, bicycle, and golf cart conflicts at the intersection. Design for project will have an estimated cost of $250,000 and is funded by a State Transportation Improvement program (STIP) grant. The planning and design work will be completed early FY22-23. Construction is dependent on identification of funding.
Budget Allocation for Minaret MUP (STIP Funds) Project Study Report: FY21-22: $250,000 Main Street Multi-Use Path (TR2)
The Main Street MUP will close a gap between the Lakes Basin Path MUP and the Town Loop MUP located at Callahan Way. The project is located on the south side of Main Street/SR203 within the Caltrans ROW. The project includes 1700LF of separated ADA compliant asphalt multi-use path, drainage improvements, slope protection, transit improvements, lighting, signage and wayfinding, and other supporting infrastructure. The project provides better connectivity, continuity, and mobility for non-motorized users. The project provides a significantly safer option than the existing conditions. The project will include design of trail wayfinding signage that will extend into the existing Main Street sidewalk project as recommended by the Trails Manager. Design for the project will have an estimated cost of $250,000 and is funded by a STIP grant. The planning and design work will be completed late FY22-23.
Construction is dependent on identification of funding.
Budget Allocation Main Street South Side MUP (STIP Funds) Project Study Report: FY21-22: $250,000 Lakes Basin Connector Trails (TR4)
Town of Mammoth Lakes proposes to construct approximately 2.5 miles of multi-use, nonmotorized U.S. Forest Service system trail(s) to provide additional recreation opportunities and connect users to popular destination features and facilities in the Lakes Basin cirque. These
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 52
soft surface trails will help to mitigate existing improvised use trails. The new trails will be supported by appropriate signage and wayfinding. The project is funded by a $50,000 allocation from the Trails Program Fund Balance, with $35,000 remaining for FY22-23.
Budget Allocation Lakes Basin Connector Trails (MTC-Trails) FY22-23: $50,000 Shady Rest / Inyo Craters OHV Planning (TR6)
In an effort to engage with OHV users and opportunities in the Shady Rest Inyo Craters sub-region, TOML applied for and was awarded a three-year planning grant from the California State Parks Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Division Grant Program in 2020. The TOML, in partnership with Inyo National Forest – Mammoth Ranger District and Mono County, is using the California OHV planning grant funds for on-the-ground planning and environmental review (NEPA/CEQA) in order to optimize existing OHV trail facilities that serve a wide spectrum of user groups and to consider enhanced opportunities for trails and sustainable recreation in the Shady Rest Inyo Craters subregion. Total budget for the project is $200,000 funded by OHV Green Sticker grant. This is a multiyear project. The project not currently in the Inyo National Forest Program of Work, and no funding is allocated for FY22-23.
Village Area Pedestrian and Transit Improvements (TT7)
The Town was approached by the Limelight Hotel developers of the property on the south side of the Westin regarding the previously planned pedestrian bridge connecting across Canyon Blvd to the Village (Gondola building). The bridge would allow a safe pedestrian connection or hotel guests, nearby condo guest and to the Town parking area by reducing the number of pedestrians crossing at street level. The transit stops on the west side of Canyon Blvd (near the stair access to the Westin) is also in need of adjustment to improve operations and a transit shelter. Integrating these potential projects together will improve the existing transit stop, reduce potential pedestrian conflicts crossing Canyon Blvd and enhanced pedestrian connection between hotel/residential/parking area with shopping and dining in the Village. Additional parking will provide visitors and locals with parking options when visiting this core commercial area.
The cost estimates are very preliminary. If authorized as a capital project design and cost estimates will be prepared for consideration.
Budget request for Pedestrian Bridge and Transit Improvements FY22-23: $3,250,000 (Funding: $800,000 CFD, $250,000 Gen Fund; $2,000,000 debt) SR203 (Main Street) Pedestrian Beacons - HSIP Grant (TT8) The Town of Mammoth Lakes submitted and was awarded a $191,400 Highway Safety Improvement Grant (HSIP) to upgrade crosswalks along SR203. The grant provides funding to upgrade two pedestrian activated crosswalk beacons (Laurel Mountain and Post Office) with RRFD signalization. A third new RRFD beacon will be installed at Mountain Blvd. The project is located within the Town of Mammoth Lakes along Main Street (SR203). Design work began in FY21-22 with construction scheduled for FY22-23. This work will be coordinated with other design and construction efforts in the area. An additional $50,000 is proposed to be added to the budget.
Funding will come from SB1 which was approved by resolution by the Town Council.
Allocated Budget for SR203 Crosswalk Upgrades (Grant Funds) FY21-22: $191,400 Budget for FY22-23: $50,000
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 53
Additional Parking Lot in the Parcel (TT9)
This project will add approximately 50 parking spaces within the Parcel to assist with parking management plans. The added spaces are designed to meet specific needs of residents of the Parcel and is not intended as a public lot. As parking management plans are implemented throughout the Parcel the site may be converted in the future to housing units. The rough estimate for this project is $150,000. Funding is recommended from the Gas Tax/Road Fund reserves. The final location and design will be completed along with Phase II planning of the Parcel project. The work will be start in FY22-23.
Budget of Road Fund Reserves for FY22-23: $150,000
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 54
Development Impact Fees Fund (830 - 841)
The fees are restricted to capital projects and as fees come in and an appropriate project is moving forward, the budget will be amended based on actual funds received and passed through upon request from the proper agencies. The Town retains 4% of all funds received for administrative purposes. The fees for FY22-23 have increased by approximately 13.4% based on the increases in the California Construction Cost Increases (CCCI) realized in the last year. Currently 10 of the funds have anticipated revenues and expenditures see chart below:
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 55
Budget Assessment Districts Fund (850 - 861)
There are a number of assessment districts within the Town. The District provides and ensures the continued maintenance, servicing, administration, and operation of various improvements and associated appurtenances located within the public right-of-way. The improvements include the installation, upgrade, construction, or reconstruction of irrigation and landscaping, street lighting, streets, sidewalks and driveways, curb and gutter, drainage facilities, and snowmelt tubing systems.
The Town contracts with NBS to perform annual Engineer’s reports on each of the assessment districts. These reports outline current fund balance against anticipated maintenance and capital improvement projects. If a variance exists between available funds and anticipated needs, a district assessment is recommended.
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 56
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 57
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 58
Fractional Mello Roos Fund (858)
The district was created to provide enhanced levels of service for designated Town Services.
FY04-05 services are used as a baseline for service, meaning these funds cannot be used for services below the baseline. Due to the reduction of service areas following the MLLA legal settlement, these funds are not available for use in most service areas. The one exception has been recreation where new amenities have been constructed providing levels of service beyond the baseline and therefore an opportunity to use the funds. The tax revenue is received from fractional ownership projects and was put in place to offset the loss of TOT revenue from such projects. This Fund has $651,000 in anticipated revenues for FY22-23 generated by charges for estimated tax revenue ($185,000), facility fees ($303,750), transfer-in ($162,000) and interest ($250). The Transfer-In is an allocation from Measure R and General Fund to support CRC operations. The opening of the CRC, anticipated in the winter of FY22-23 has increased both revenue and expenditure expectations for this fund. The transfer in from Measure R was increased this year by $37,000 to $112,000. This was achieved by removing Measure R support for both Whitmore and Trails End Park maintenance. These expenses have been absorbed by the General Fund. The General Fund has also contributed $50,000 to the operating expenses for FY22-23.
Fund 910 – Garage Services
The Vehicle Service Fund, also referred to as the Garage, is used to track cost of maintenance for our vehicle fleet. The garage staff is comprised of four mechanics, two mechanic trainees, and one fleet superintendent. The staff maintains all vehicles in the Town’s fleet, including most repairs, fuel, and periodic maintenance. When work is performed on a vehicle, the department where that vehicle is assigned will be charged the cost of repair including staff time. This type of an account is known as internal service fund where expenses are covered by work performed for other departments. The list of estimated charges, within the FY22-23 budget are listed below:
In addition to internal service, this department services outside entities that use our repair and fuel services. These outside agencies include Eastern Sierra Transit Authority, Schools, Fire, and some county vehicles. The fund has projected revenues of $1,187,952 and expenditure of $1,498,653 for
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 59
FY22-23. These expenditures include a transfer out to Gas Tax of $60,000 to cover 50% of maintenance for the garage facility. Staff reviewed the revenue projections and has balanced the fund for FY22-23. However, a review of actual performance at each quarter is recommended for possible adjustment. This fund used to also contain the vehicle replacement program and some funding for that program may have masked the discrepancies between revenue and the expense to deliver services. If billing proves insufficient to cover expenses, additional funds will be transferred from General Fund to cover the shortfall and a thorough review of staff and billing practices will determine the root cause.
Fund 915 – Vehicle Replacement
The vehicle replacement fund was new for FY21-22, separating vehicle replacement from garage services. This change was made to separate two diverse but equally important motor pool functions and provide clarity into the cost of operations for the unit. The vehicle replacement portion supports the purchase of a replacement vehicle once the existing piece of equipment is all used up.
This is accomplished using a calculation to estimate required annual set aside to cover future replacement costs based on expected lifespan, original vehicle costs and annual CPI increases.
The vehicle is assigned to a division which is charged to specific funds and departments who use the vehicle.
The vehicle replacement fund contains both cash and debt as it was used as part of the stabilization of the Town’s finances after the MLLA settlement agreement. The General Fund makes an annual payment of $340,000 to pay back the internal loan which should be paid off in the next couple of years as the repayment process has been accelerated. The difference between accrued fund balance and available cash is the unpaid loan. Below is a list of charges for the FY22-23 budget by operating department:
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 60
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 61
Debt Service / Future Capital Fund (990)
The Town has a variety of debt including the bond for the police station, and the bond payment for the MLLA settlement, and inter-fund loan between the General Fund and the Vehicle Replacement Fund. The Town has been accelerating the repayment of the internal loan and expects to have this debt paid off in FY23-24 with a current outstanding balance of $1,271,207. The chart below reflects the debt payments made to external entities. The 2004 Bluff’s development funding, paid for by assessments on property tax in the Bluffs was fully paid in FY21-22 and is no longer a part of our debt schedule. This adjustment is noted in fund 990 for debt payments as well as Fund 852 where the assessment revenue and expenditures are noted. A summary of the Town’s operating debt service is as follows:
Fiscal Year 2
2-23 Final Budget Page 62
Fiscal Year 22-23 Final Budget Page 63
This fund also includes future capital component for technology improvement or minor facility improvements. Staff is also recommending a return to prior practice of transferring the full $2M payment for MLLA settlement and allowing excess funds to accumulate for future capital projects. The difference between the $2M allocation and actual debt payment will provide $131,594 in funding for a future capital project.
CONCLUSION
This concludes our annual budget process for FY22-23. In total, the Town’s budget is comprised of $70,827,517 in total resources (Revenue and Transfer In) and $104,533,178 in total appropriations leaving a negative change in fund balance of $33,705,661 across 40 Funds. Staff is committed to working within the Towns’ financial limits and the policy direction provided by Town Council as we provide services to our community. Attached to the staff report is a line-item detail of the proposed budget. Staff has put considerable effort in delivering a thorough and thoughtful budget through a collaborative process including Town leadership as well as Council direction. Once a final budget is adopted, staff will begin work on a budget book to aid in public understanding of our budget details along with department goals and objectives for FY22-23.
Final Budget Presentation
Fiscal Year 22-23
Rob Patterson
Administrative Services / Finance Director
June 15, 2022
FY22-23 Final Budget - Resolutions and Policy for consideration
FY22-23 – Budget Overview - Revenue
FY22-23 – Budget Overview - Expenditures
Budget FY22-23 – Combined Fund Statement
All Funds – Employees
All Funds – Labor Distribution – Full-Time
All Funds – Labor Distribution – Full-Time continued
All Funds – Labor Distribution – Part-Time
All Funds – Labor Distribution – Summary
All Funds – Labor Distribution – Summary
General Fund Revenue – Major Components
General Fund Revenue – Summary
General Fund Revenue - Summary
General Fund Expenditure – Summary by Department
General Fund Expenditure – Summary
Gas Tax Fund 210
Gas Tax Fund 210
Measure R – Fund 215 & 216
Measure U - Fund 217
Airport Operations Fund 220
Airport Operations Fund 220
Capital Projects - Fund 300
Capital Projects - Fund 300 - Continued
Development Impact Fees
Development Impact Fees - Continued
Assessment Districts
Assessment Districts – Continued
Assessment Districts – Cont.
Garage Services - Fund 910
Vehicle Replacement - Fund 915
Vehicle Replacement - Fund 915
Debt Reserve / Future Capital - Fund 990
RESOLUTION NO. 22-
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
WHEREAS, The Town Manager submitted to the Town Council a proposed Annual Budget for the Town of Mammoth Lakes for Fiscal Year 2022-23; and WHEREAS, public notice has been published and a public hearing was held on the proposed Annual Budget on June 15, 2022 at the Town Council Chamber at which time interested persons desiring to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, after the conclusion of the public hearing, the Town Council further considered the proposed Annual Budget and directed revisions as warranted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, as follows:
1. That the foregoing statements are true and correct.
2. The document entitled “Town of Mammoth Lakes Proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operating and Capital Budget,” which is incorporated herein by reference only, is hereby adopted with the following revisions, modifications, and policy limitations as the Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23 for the Town of Mammoth Lakes, CA, effective July 1, 2022:
a) All revisions and changes which are necessary and accordance with the Town Council’s direction during consideration and review are incorporated as part of the adoption of said budget.
b) Any adjustment of estimated year-end reserves (Fund Balance) to actual. c) Incorporation of encumbered funds by contracts, purchase orders, grants, funds held in trust, authorized projects, programs, or capital projects. d) Any corrections of mathematical or typographical errors. e) Any adjustments authorized pursuant to Town Council action or resolution that changes or set salaries, benefits, or terms and conditions of employment for any position, employee, or unit of employees. f) Any adjustments to revenue estimates as a result of adopted changes to the Town’s fee schedule.
g) Any adjustments to revenues and expenditures due to the receipt of specific dedicated funds.
3. Grant funds are continuously appropriated for the purpose approved during the term of the grant agreement and pursuant to the budget established in each grant application and contract as approved by the Town.
4. Funds held in trust are continuously appropriated for the purposes for which such funds have been placed in trust and are restricted to those purposes.
5. Capital Project revenues and expenditures for governmental and enterprise appropriations may be distributed between individual project accounts within
the Capital Project Fund as recommended by the Public Works Director and approved by the Town Manager to properly manage and account for the project’s financial activity. Capital Project funds appropriated by the Town Council are continuously appropriated until the completion of the project.
6. The Town Manager and Finance Director are authorized to administer said adopted budget in accordance with the provisions of the Town’s Municipal Code, Town Council actions, and administrative policies and regulations.
7. Appropriations to departments as authorized by the Annual Budget are subject to receipt of adequate revenues or appropriated reserves. Such appropriations may be limited to available revenues. The Town Manager is authorized to transfer funds within the budget to ensure expenditures of the Town are properly accounted for and expenses properly funded.
8. The staffing allocations as provided for in the budget are authorized, with current and future vacant positions to be filled by direction of the Town Manager, including the under-filling of any position. The Town Manager is authorized to manage the staffing allocations within the approved budget.
9. The budget may be amended from time to time by action of the Town Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th day of June 2022.
_________________________
LYNDA SALCIDO, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
JAMIE GRAY, Town Clerk
Town of Mammoth Lakes
Proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23
Operating and Capital Budget
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 100 ‐ General Fund
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
27,903,841 28,411,983 35,458,290 24,874,749 28,650,373 $ 27,630,890 28,763,430 25,967,453 39,669,877 24,037,624 41,565,357 $ 27,630,890 (859,589) 2,444,530 (4,211,587) 837,125 ‐ (12,914,984) $
REVENUE
100‐000‐30202 Property Tax Secured 2,626,612 2,717,955 2,871,455 2,904,850 2,904,850 $ 3,210,000 100‐000‐30204 Property Tax Unsecured 198,595 204,235 186,176 180,000 200,000 $ 190,000 100‐000‐30210 Prior Secured & Escapes 23,663 54,293 21,770 30,000 30,000 $ 30,000 100‐000‐30230 Documentary Transfer Tax 166,728 481,581 260,691 175,000 175,000 $ 175,000 100‐000‐30234 Current Supplemental Tax 31,242 50,505 95,797 15,000 65,000 $ 50,000 100‐000‐30250 Homeowners Exemption 13,582 6,405 76,409 20,000 50,000 $ 50,000 100‐000‐30260 Property Tax‐In Lieu VLF 915,028 961,856 508,040 820,000 820,000 $ 875,000100‐000‐30270 ERAF Excess 77,928 90,975 91,883 70,000 120,000 $ 70,000100‐000‐30402 Sales Tax 2,372,657 2,513,299 2,702,147 2,600,000 2,600,000 $ 2,700,000 100‐000‐30604 TOT: Current Year 15,911,859 16,599,247 24,252,655 14,500,000 17,750,000 $ 16,000,000 100‐000‐30640 TOT: Certificates 9,695 10,225 10,551 7,000 7,000 $ 7,000 100‐000‐30644 TOT: Penalties & Interest 211,360 92,051 136,534 100,000 100,000 $ 100,000 100‐000‐30660 TOT: Revenue Violations 94,039 148,977 154,418 60,000 60,000 $ 100,000 100‐000‐30661 TOT: Rev Viol Pen & Interest 55,847 75,715 65,380 30,000 30,000 $ 50,000 100‐000‐30670 TOT: Zoning Violations 9,772 14,282 2,259 15,000 15,000 $ 15,000 100‐000‐30671 TOT: Zoning Viol Pen & Interes 6,373 4,111 11,638 15,000 15,000 $ 15,000 100‐000‐30802 Business Tax 330,604 302,644 331,113 320,000 320,000 $ 310,000 100‐000‐30803 Cannabis Tax 160,539 161,553 134,567 130,000 130,000 $ 130,000 100‐000‐30810 Bus Tax Penalties & Interest 13,161 13,639 35,503 6,000 6,000 $ 14,000 100‐000‐30830 Business Lic Application Fee 16,770 20,614 18,421 12,000 12,000 $ 12,000100‐000‐30835 Cannabis Business Registration 4,000 8,000 6,000 18,000 18,000 $ 18,000 100‐000‐30840 Business Lic Renewal Fee 22,992 21,412 23,973 20,000 20,000 $ 20,000 100‐000‐31204 Franchise Fee: Solid Waste 231,858 333,463 207,440 252,000 252,000 $ 315,000 100‐000‐31206 Franchise Fee: Electricity 242,613 230,301 262,258 210,000 210,000 $ 230,000 100‐000‐31208 Franchise Fee: Gas 116,467 ‐ 109,515 125,000 125,000 $ 125,000 100‐000‐31210 Franchise Fee: Cable 260,098 185,658 179,513 225,000 225,000 $ 230,000 100‐000‐31410 Encroachment Permits 3,375 3,250 6,750 4,000 4,000 $ 4,000 100‐000‐31414 Grading Permits 5,650 11,825 14,975 7,000 7,000 $ 10,000NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
100‐000‐31420 Building Permits 623,387 934,970 1,058,608 700,000 700,000 $ 760,000 100‐000‐31440 Animal Licenses 3,540 2,797 1,103 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 100‐000‐31444 Animal Licenses Penalties 255 ‐ 70 200 200 $ 200 100‐000‐31450 Concealed Weapon Permit 3,149 4,395 2,085 1,500 1,500 $ 1,500 100‐000‐31464 Taxicab Driver Permit 128 64 128 300 300 $ 300 100‐000‐31470 Special Events Permit 3,762 418 4,470 4,180 4,180 $ 7,600 100‐000‐31602 Charges for Services 241,248 176,743 94,266 265,049 265,049 $ 198,990 100‐000‐31604 Sale of Documents 503 1,240 (9,013) 500 500 $ 500 100‐000‐31606 Credit Card Service Fee 13,249 13,544 22,572 14,000 14,000 $ 16,000 100‐000‐31610 Facility Rental 185,047 153,095 191,547 165,000 165,000 $ 165,000 100‐000‐31620 Plan Review‐New Bus & Home Occ 2,625 2,344 2,015 2,500 2,500 $ 2,500 100‐000‐31624 Planning & Zoning Applications 47,479 80,803 321,105 75,000 95,000 $ 120,000 100‐000‐31626 Master Plan Fees 34,142 21,047 32,130 25,000 25,000 $ 25,000 100‐000‐31630 Engineering Fees 9,325 17,755 34,010 10,000 10,000 $ 20,000 100‐000‐31640 Forest Service Contract 6,230 6,230 8,835 9,000 9,000 $ 9,000 100‐000‐31652 Transit Fee 116,154 119,889 123,638 116,500 116,500 $ 125,000 100‐000‐31664 Recreation Program Fees 33,089 26,112 50,113 90,000 90,000 $ 160,000 100‐000‐31670 Whitmore Master 12,812 10,064 16,024 16,000 16,000 $ 18,000 100‐000‐31672 Whitmore Pool Reimb 91,573 ‐ 101,048 50,000 150,000 $ 100,000 100‐000‐31690 Archival Storage Fee 436 11,250 16,277 7,500 7,500 $ 7,500 100‐000‐31692 Fingerprint Service 18,711 20,689 21,445 12,000 12,000 $ 20,000 100‐000‐32810 Municipal Court Fines 8,211 14,436 11,098 8,000 8,000 $ 8,000 100‐000‐32820 Parking Citations 28,406 19,345 23,300 25,000 25,000 $ 25,000 100‐000‐32830 Vehicle Impound Fees 2,400 1,365 1,050 4,000 4,000 $ 4,000 100‐000‐32860 Civil Penalties:Municipal Code 9,400 110,690 102,692 30,000 30,000 $ 50,000 100‐000‐34230 COPS ‐ FED ‐ ‐ ‐ 25,000 25,000 $ 25,000 100‐000‐35220 COPS‐OPTION Public Safety 175,057 156,699 49,474 100,000 100,000 $ 100,000 100‐000‐35221 Officer Training Reimb 3,661 9,622 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 100‐000‐35403 Vehicle License Fee in Excess 6,517 6,039 9,512 6,000 6,000 $ 6,000 100‐000‐36005 Tobacco Grant 192,110 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 103,800 100‐000‐37002 Interest on Investments 247,879 92,726 34,866 29,670 29,670 $ 65,000 100‐000‐37004 Interest from County 105,690 57,664 13,880 20,000 20,000 $ 20,000 100‐000‐37100 Refunds and Rebates 96,169 20,979 156,712 30,000 170,000 $ 30,000 100‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 1,326,724 623,000 160,027 150,000 150,000 $ 375,000 TOTAL REVENUE 27,903,841 28,411,983 35,458,290 24,874,749 28,650,373 $ 27,630,890
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 410 TOWN COUNCIL
EXPENSES
100‐410‐40000 Regular Salaries ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100‐410‐40111 Temporary Wages 44,740 49,203 35,802 46,305 46,305 $ 44,739 100‐410‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 63,730 73,835 87,281 102,408 102,408 $ 112,827 100‐410‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) 882 1,073 603 900 900 $ 882 100‐410‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 8,240 350 1,126 22,000 22,000 $ 25,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 118,017 124,737 125,101 171,613 171,613 $ 183,449 DEPT 412 LEGAL SERVICES
EXPENSES
100‐412‐43031 Contractual Services 106,568 184,795 144,601 185,000 185,000 $ 190,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 106,568 184,795 145,266 185,000 185,000 $ 190,000 DEPT 413 TOWN MANAGER
EXPENSES
100‐413‐40000 Regular Salaries 248,889 267,954 283,443 302,299 309,739 $ 328,949 100‐413‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (22,552) ‐ (4,670) 13,047 13,047 $ 18,999 100‐413‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 56,634 59,356 59,416 59,918 59,918 $ 69,359 100‐413‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 14,797 20,841 15,313 21,022 21,022 $ 22,396 100‐413‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 98,752 124,763 122,106 117,588 117,588 $ 129,682 100‐413‐42030 Special Operational 3,996 773 8,445 15,000 15,000 $ 15,000 100‐413‐43031 Contractual Services 143,530 34,868 26,034 42,500 42,500 $ 17,500 100‐413‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 7,836 2,800 630 13,000 13,000 $ 13,000100‐413‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices 3,927 2,397 11,985 4,500 4,500 $ 4,500 100‐413‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 7,158 50 1,397 10,000 10,000 $ 10,000 100‐413‐44520 Emergency Preparedness 357 ‐ ‐ 5,000 5,000 $ 7,500 TOTAL EXPENSES 563,323 509,131 528,769 603,874 611,314 $ 636,886
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 414 TOWN CLERK
EXPENSES
100‐414‐40000 Regular Salaries 154,823 161,269 150,132 160,727 168,727 $ 168,153 100‐414‐40130 Comprehensive Leave 1,090 ‐ 1,455 5,116 5,116 $ 3,311 100‐414‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 57,503 59,310 59,461 63,828 63,828 $ 70,720 100‐414‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 8,526 10,970 7,490 11,055 11,055 $ 11,093 100‐414‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 55,944 64,405 63,742 58,627 58,627 $ 60,797 100‐414‐42030 Special Operational 5,133 5,173 8,073 5,250 5,250 $ 15,000 100‐414‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 573 265 745 500 500 $ 500 100‐414‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices 2,742 2,330 4,365 2,750 2,750 $ 2,750 100‐414‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 2,203 ‐ 3,042 5,500 5,500 $ 5,500 100‐414‐44600 Codification 5,527 7,292 3,486 4,500 4,500 $ 34,500 100‐414‐44620 Municipal Election 369 2,286 454 4,000 4,000 $ 9,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 294,432 314,754 300,990 321,853 329,853 $ 381,324 DEPT 415 FINANCE
EXPENSES
100‐415‐40000 Regular Salaries 500,837 561,413 573,262 559,780 587,736 $ 600,714 100‐415‐40111 Temporary Wages ‐ 21,141 23,443 24,401 24,401 $ 27,808 100‐415‐40113 Overtime Wages ‐ 2,268 332 2,500 2,500 $ 2,500 100‐415‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (15,936) ‐ 2,659 24,541 24,541 $ 26,682 100‐415‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 176,225 198,441 212,389 221,368 221,368 $ 251,400 100‐415‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 31,964 38,762 26,583 38,952 38,952 $ 40,590 100‐415‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 180,845 210,839 199,931 188,807 188,807 $ 203,060 100‐415‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) ‐ 480 399 481 481 $ 548 100‐415‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip $ 1,317
100‐415‐42030 Special Operational 564 38 76 300 300 $ 300 100‐415‐43031 Contractual Services 76,873 72,428 74,992 75,000 88,000 $ 75,000 100‐415‐43100 Audit Services 59,945 50,095 68,630 60,000 60,000 $ 65,000 100‐415‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 208 167 212 300 300 $ 300 100‐415‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices 167 1,611 1,843 2,500 2,500 $ 2,500100‐415‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 2,204 ‐ 2,069 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 100‐415‐43422 SB 1559 Tax Admin Fee 78,404 ‐ 52,644 82,000 162,000 $ 82,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,092,313 1,160,340 1,236,805 1,285,930 1,406,886 $ 1,384,719
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 416 GENERAL SERVICES
EXPENSES
100‐416‐42002 Office Supplies 22,312 20,492 14,728 23,000 23,000 $ 23,000 100‐416‐42005 Postal Supplies & Postage 13,734 13,658 11,682 17,500 17,500 $ 17,500 100‐416‐42030 Special Operational 7,600 5,857 4,261 17,500 17,500 $ 17,500 100‐416‐43031 Contractual Services 33,650 29,772 34,028 89,287 89,287 $ 145,700 100‐416‐43060 Garage Vehicle Service 29,807 46,356 22,812 30,000 30,000 $ 35,000 100‐416‐43066 Vehicle & Equip Replacement 42,396 22,014 43,202 43,202 43,202 $ 30,308 100‐416‐43106 Insurance Premiums 638,498 607,076 676,834 618,986 618,986 $ 588,627 100‐416‐43114 Credit Card Fees 28,962 28,022 39,503 27,000 27,000 $ 30,000100‐416‐43180 Contingency ‐ ‐ 90,000 100,000 190,000 $ 100,000 100‐416‐43404 Public Utilities 49,908 77,758 33,739 60,000 60,000 $ 60,000 100‐416‐44220 Community Support Fund 15,659 20,067 122,607 25,000 125,000 $ 27,500 100‐416‐45010 Facility Lease 313,331 407,758 425,687 391,500 391,500 $ 420,000 100‐416‐46010 Equipment Lease 9,875 39,283 9,668 37,000 37,000 $ 39,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,877,094 1,318,118 1,529,011 1,479,975 1,669,975 $ 1,534,135 DEPT 417 HUMAN RESOURCES
EXPENSES
100‐417‐40000 Regular Salaries 166,917 189,254 118,701 180,752 184,752 $ 169,612 100‐417‐40130 Comprehensive Leave 2,216 ‐ (8,525) 5,003 5,003 $ 12,597 100‐417‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 56,634 55,353 35,926 63,828 63,828 $ 58,433 100‐417‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 9,174 11,598 8,389 12,383 12,383 $ 11,788 100‐417‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 55,365 62,921 63,141 58,719 58,719 $ 57,698 100‐417‐42030 Special Operational 4,565 4,085 7,776 6,000 6,000 $ 10,000 100‐417‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 1,073 1,559 764 1,500 1,500 $ 2,000 100‐417‐43140 Recruiting & Other HR 19,052 21,550 19,568 16,000 16,000 $ 20,000 100‐417‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 4,972 3,495 4,085 4,000 4,000 $ 5,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 319,968 341,290 258,350 348,185 352,185 $ 347,129
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 418 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
PAM KOBYLARZEXPENSES
100‐418‐43031 Contractual Services 14,583 7,555 7,514 13,000 13,000 $ 8,000 100‐418‐43033 Computer Support Services 125,000 250,000 187,500 250,000 250,000 $ 250,000 100‐418‐43404 Public Utilities 23,897 43,265 33,781 24,500 24,500 $ 30,000 100‐418‐45050 Equipment Maint Agreements 227,503 149,781 138,902 153,600 153,600 $ 153,600 100‐418‐48800 Computer Hardware ‐ Capital 38,551 31,387 16,515 31,000 31,000 $ 31,000 100‐418‐48900 Computer Software ‐ Capital 43,305 22,558 32,240 3,300 3,300 $ 23,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 474,367 549,065 427,823 475,400 475,400 $ 495,600 DEPT 420 POLICE SERVICES
EXPENSES
100‐420‐40000 Regular Salaries 1,657,571 2,006,119 1,724,148 1,923,901 1,943,593 $ 1,984,199 100‐420‐40111 Temporary Wages 95,941 6,253 38 29,200 29,200 $ 37,734 100‐420‐40113 Overtime Wages 212,688 85,153 152,532 100,000 100,000 $ 125,000 100‐420‐40115 Police Holiday Pay 69,579 86,659 78,682 91,273 91,273 $ 91,273100‐420‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (21,974) ‐ 22,156 75,638 75,638 $ 90,520 100‐420‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 391,655 418,199 386,036 483,636 483,636 $ 465,690 100‐420‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 86,885 130,281 98,754 139,378 139,378 $ 140,108 100‐420‐41016 Unemployment Assessment 1,123 1,264 317 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000100‐420‐41018 ICMA VantageCare 61,813 59,625 53,300 62,000 62,000 $ 62,000 100‐420‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 986,466 1,129,668 872,088 1,044,683 1,044,683 $ 1,086,721 100‐420‐41024 PARS (Retirement Enhanced) 18,720 17,280 15,840 15,000 15,000 $ 15,000 100‐420‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) 734 157 1 1,480 1,480 $ 1,451 100‐420‐42002 Office Supplies 4,929 2,511 1,710 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 100‐420‐42005 Postal Supplies & Postage 3,492 672 906 1,000 1,000 $ 1,000 100‐420‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 27,003 8,243 18,051 20,000 20,000 $ 20,000 100‐420‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 1,125 641 1,089 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 100‐420‐42030 Special Operational 14,131 19,860 6,652 20,000 20,000 $ 20,000 100‐420‐43031 Contractual Services 104,949 96,076 85,821 80,000 80,000 $ 80,000 100‐420‐43032 Dispatch Services 389,289 405,510 400,040 400,040 400,040 $ 438,088 100‐420‐43060 Garage Vehicle Service 128,199 165,755 83,768 75,000 75,000 $ 95,000 100‐420‐43066 Vehicle & Equip Replacement 46,500 24,655 58,879 58,850 58,850 $ 57,525 100‐420‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 4,014 3,872 4,571 3,000 3,000 $ 4,000
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
100‐420‐43120 Printing & Reproduction 4,935 1,517 635 7,500 7,500 $ 7,500 100‐420‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices 232 571 410 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 100‐420‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 31,156 12,720 23,700 25,000 25,000 $ 35,000 100‐420‐43156 DOJ Fingerprint Live 11,019 10,625 9,641 12,000 12,000 $ 12,000 100‐420‐43404 Public Utilities 30,411 46,325 45,461 35,000 35,000 $ 50,000 100‐420‐45060 Gen'l Facilities Maint 311 3,383 6,908 7,500 7,500 $ 8,000 100‐420‐45400 Communication Equip Maint 2,819 ‐ 2,282 7,500 7,500 $ 7,500 100‐420‐46010 Equipment Lease 14,276 5,155 4,370 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 100‐420‐46300 Communic Equip ‐ Non Cap 3,889 2,793 481 10,000 10,000 $ 5,000100‐420‐46440 Office Equip & Furniture 31,374 3,352 3,901 7,500 7,500 $ 7,500 100‐420‐46450 Firearms 4,772 6,199 4,051 15,500 15,500 $ 15,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 4,445,636 4,873,572.05 4,150,956 4,778,579 4,798,271 $ 4,984,809 DEPT 432 RECREATION PROGRAMS
EXPENSES
100‐432‐40000 Regular Salaries 250,557 239,545 286,637 289,387 296,310 $ 312,587 100‐432‐40111 Temporary Wages 48,484 12,154 41,647 96,296 96,296 $ 128,357 100‐432‐40113 Overtime Wages 7,303 333 913 6,000 6,000 $ 6,000 100‐432‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (13,711) ‐ (1,630) 25,292 25,292 $ 26,677 100‐432‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 80,458 74,117 88,323 101,880 101,880 $ 91,004 100‐432‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 13,865 16,021 14,211 20,977 20,977 $ 21,949 100‐432‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 85,889 93,798 115,610 108,761 108,761 $ 117,725 100‐432‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) 943 342 805 1,898 1,898 $ 2,530 100‐432‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 647 227 1,546 2,000 2,000 $ 2,500 100‐432‐42008 Recreation Supplies 6,368 5,291 4,002 9,000 9,000 $ 10,000 100‐432‐42009 Amenities Enhancement Program ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 5,000 100‐432‐42030 Special Operational 8,414 1,425 3,896 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 100‐432‐43031 Contractual Services 21,647 2,426 20,395 22,000 22,000 $ 30,000 100‐432‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 1,911 1,770 1,642 2,000 2,000 $ 1,800 100‐432‐43120 Printing & Reproduction 989 1,773 815 2,500 2,500 $ 3,000 100‐432‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices 3,955 326 3,501 4,000 4,000 $ 4,000 100‐432‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 3,906 317 2,547 4,000 4,000 $ 5,000 100‐432‐43164 Excursions & Field Trips 2,802 100 1,889 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000 100‐432‐44300 Fishing Enhancement 52,777 52,818 54,019 54,000 54,000 $ 104,580 100‐432‐44310 Community Youth Programs ‐ ‐ 42,738 36,800 36,800 $ 45,000 100‐432‐44320 Fireworks Display 32,726 21,750 19,059 35,000 35,000 $ 35,000
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
TOTAL EXPENSES 624,730 574,119 662,181 829,791 836,714 $ 960,710 DEPT 434 WHITMORE POOL & REC AREA
EXPENSES
100‐434‐40000 Regular Salaries 48,769 51,077 46,581 61,399 63,719 $ 78,021 100‐434‐40111 Temporary Wages 43,769 54,615 34,056 94,584 94,584 $ 93,431 100‐434‐40113 Overtime Wages 991 769 533 1,000 1,000 $ 1,000 100‐434‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,289 5,289 $ 5,051 100‐434‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ 80 (80) 30,943 30,943 $ 30,583 100‐434‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 2,630 3,061 5,159 4,446 4,446 $ 5,374 100‐434‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 11,153 12,203 16,460 21,474 21,474 $ 27,237 100‐434‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) 600 1,186 (25) 1,865 1,865 $ 1,842 100‐434‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 1,075 1,317 262 2,000 2,000 $ 2,500 100‐434‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 2,339 695 1,611 3,000 3,000 $ 3,500 100‐434‐42008 Recreation Supplies 431 510 123 2,500 2,500 $ 3,000 100‐434‐42009 Pool Supplies 9,438 5,688 8,333 5,500 5,500 $ 7,000 100‐434‐42030 Special Operational 192 345 336 750 750 $ 1,000 100‐434‐43031 Contractual Services 7,812 2,033 19,359 5,000 55,000 $ 8,000 100‐434‐43060 Garage Vehicle Service 17,800 21,453 20,683 18,000 18,000 $ 22,000 100‐434‐43066 Vehicle & Equip Replacement 14,505 9,657 17,936 16,203 16,203 $ 24,917 100‐434‐43120 Printing & Reproduction ‐ ‐ ‐ 500 500 $ 500 100‐434‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices 225 ‐ ‐ 1,000 1,000 $ 1,000 100‐434‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 3,082 258 1,447 3,000 3,000 $ 4,000 100‐434‐43404 Public Utilities 25,491 32,427 34,355 35,000 35,000 $ 40,000 100‐434‐43420 Taxes & Fees 1,971 1,738 1,880 1,500 1,500 $ 2,000 100‐434‐45010 Facility Lease ‐ 687 360 750 750 $ 750
100‐434‐45080 Park Grounds & Bldgs Maint 12,073 8,879 11,202 12,000 12,000 $ 15,500 TOTAL EXPENSES 205,918 209,019 220,911 327,703 380,023 $ 378,207
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 436 Arts & Culture
EXPENSES
100‐436‐40111 Temporary Wages ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 53,683 100‐436‐40113 Overtime Wages ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 1,000 100‐436‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 1,058 100‐436‐42007 Maintenance Supplies ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 2,500 100‐436‐45010 Facility Lease ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 24,000 TOTAL EXPENSES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 92,242 DEPT 438 PARKS, BLDGS & TRAIL MAINT
EXPENSES
100‐438‐40000 Regular Salaries 191,965 204,828 205,143 178,160 186,320 $ 225,098 100‐438‐40111 Temporary Wages 47,261 49,865 26,368 58,908 58,908 $ 63,850 100‐438‐40113 Overtime Wages 11,928 14,186 15,997 10,000 10,000 $ 10,000 100‐438‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (31,589) ‐ (845) 10,884 10,884 $ 16,388 100‐438‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 55,047 46,232 62,459 71,632 71,632 $ 77,354 100‐438‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 8,551 11,432 12,761 12,602 12,602 $ 15,623 100‐438‐41016 Unemployment Assessment 8,731 3,165 251 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 100‐438‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 76,710 72,817 80,996 66,732 66,732 $ 84,775 100‐438‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) 1,335 1,773 454 1,161 1,161 $ 1,259 100‐438‐42003 Misc Supplies 773 504 62 2,000 2,000 $ 5,000 100‐438‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 2,956 2,693 2,752 4,300 4,300 $ 4,500 100‐438‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 13,863 8,232 2,035 15,000 15,000 $ 15,000 100‐438‐43031 Contractual Services 3,979 5,807 6,040 15,000 15,000 $ 15,000 100‐438‐43060 Garage Vehicle Service 54,537 68,123 62,050 53,000 53,000 $ 58,000 100‐438‐43066 Vehicle & Equip Replacement 43,514 28,971 53,060 47,934 47,934 $ 73,714100‐438‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 1,176 90 690 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000 100‐438‐43404 Public Utilities 57,590 69,084 53,000 60,000 60,000 $ 80,000 100‐438‐45080 Park Grounds & Bldgs Maint 13,328 11,696 10,938 16,000 16,000 $ 16,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 603,037 644,301 601,487 636,313 699,981 $ 769,561
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 440 PLANNING DIVISION
EXPENSES
100‐440‐40000 Regular Salaries 470,061 482,855 435,450 411,912 429,592 $ 440,344 100‐440‐40111 Temporary Wages 7,075 18,312 22,102 11,000 11,000 $ 29,085 100‐440‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (4,724) ‐ 12,333 19,958 19,958 $ 25,133 100‐440‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 121,147 156,333 136,930 125,991 125,991 $ 149,625 100‐440‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 25,180 23,111 25,524 28,789 28,789 $ 30,114 100‐440‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 143,672 142,301 157,864 146,869 146,869 $ 158,365 100‐440‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) 124 393 394 200 200 $ 557 100‐440‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 354 ‐ 620 1,000 1,000 $ 1,000 100‐440‐43031 Contractual Services 125,263 110,156 228,958 25,000 315,000 $ 155,000 100‐440‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 1,268 3,147 2,318 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000 100‐440‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices 780 2,044 3,823 1,500 1,500 $ 3,000 100‐440‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 8,302 20 9,985 12,000 12,000 $ 12,000 100‐440‐44500 Air Quality Management 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,500 25,500 $ 25,500 TOTAL EXPENSES 924,409 975,956 1,049,291 812,719 1,120,399 $ 1,032,722 DEPT 442 BUILDING DIVISION
EXPENSES
100‐442‐40000 Regular Salaries 255,339 272,859 257,491 189,456 201,096 $ 310,254 100‐442‐40113 Overtime Wages 227 ‐ 4 500 500 $ 500 100‐442‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (33,936) ‐ 3,048 9,160 9,160 $ 15,026 100‐442‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 68,704 53,061 64,865 103,840 103,840 $ 137,659 100‐442‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 14,493 22,501 27,765 20,846 20,846 $ 21,057 100‐442‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 96,209 108,369 102,810 109,259 109,259 $ 115,175 100‐442‐42003 Misc Supplies 572 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 2,000 100‐442‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 460 93 405 500 500 $ 500 100‐442‐43031 Contractual Services 232,920 78,012 142,034 180,000 170,000 $ 200,000 100‐442‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 6,603 937 1,465 1,500 1,500 $ 10,000 100‐442‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices 8,801 ‐ 554 1,000 1,000 $ 3,000 100‐442‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 4,456 2,871 5,018 6,000 6,000 $ 8,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 654,846 541,755 602,407 622,061 623,701 $ 823,170
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 444 CODE COMPLIANCE
EXPENSES
100‐444‐40000 Regular Salaries 40,186 58,219 56,995 59,731 63,731 $ 64,309 100‐444‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (824) ‐ 71 ‐ ‐ $ 1,403 100‐444‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 23,087 26,383 26,381 28,500 28,500 $ 31,498 100‐444‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 2,320 3,577 2,698 3,982 3,982 $ 4,251 100‐444‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 12,932 19,422 20,625 18,882 18,882 $ 20,808 100‐444‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip ‐ ‐ 398 300 300 $ 300 100‐444‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200 1,200 $ 600 100‐444‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 95 141 95 100 100 $ 100 100‐444‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 1,598 ‐ 859 3,100 3,100 $ 3,100 TOTAL EXPENSES 79,841 109,078 106,794 115,795 119,795 $ 126,369 DEPT 445 HOUSING PROGRAMS & PLANNING
Sandra Moberly
EXPENSES
100‐445‐40000 Regular Salaries 123,371 142,536 120,858 96,684 101,324 $ 106,083 100‐445‐40130 Comprehensive Leave 833 ‐ ‐ 2,700 2,700 $ 3,473 100‐445‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 56,768 65,884 50,062 40,769 40,769 $ 42,174 100‐445‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 6,548 12,957 20,843 6,625 6,625 $ 7,088 100‐445‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 43,177 66,643 41,486 36,225 36,225 $ 40,449 100‐445‐43031 Contractual Services 737,759 390,072 371,000 340,000 375,000 $ 346,000 100‐445‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices 636 216 849 31,748 31,748 $ 1,000 100‐445‐49999 Transfers Out ‐ Housing ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,230,000 1,230,000 $ 499,932 TOTAL EXPENSES 969,091 678,308 1,835,099 554,751 1,824,391 $ 1,046,200
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 460 ENG, PUBLIC WORKS & ADMIN
EXPENSES
100‐460‐40000 Regular Salaries 396,793 240,349 216,121 331,055 345,595 $ 468,072 100‐460‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (26,933) ‐ 5,053 15,359 15,359 $ 29,462 100‐460‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 65,921 46,713 61,073 78,689 78,689 $ 138,030 100‐460‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 23,518 24,545 20,977 23,093 23,093 $ 32,188 100‐460‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 141,472 117,049 119,327 117,639 117,639 $ 166,384 100‐460‐42005 Postal Supplies & Postage ‐ 49 24 200 200 $ 200 100‐460‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip ‐ 722 1,026 1,500 1,500 $ 2,500 100‐460‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 71 ‐ 270 250 250 $ 250 100‐460‐43031 Contractual Services 71,080 43,308 26,599 40,000 40,000 $ 80,000 100‐460‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 2,455 473 1,898 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 689,694 478,660 461,176 609,785 624,325 $ 919,087 DEPT 464 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES
100‐464‐40000 Regular Salaries 40,995 47,823 44,269 42,344 45,344 $ 48,659 100‐464‐40111 Temporary Wages 11,781 18,277 11,327 13,852 13,852 $ 15,170 100‐464‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (2,034) ‐ 245 1,135 1,135 $ 275 100‐464‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 10,657 10,986 10,890 12,852 12,852 $ 13,958 100‐464‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 2,111 2,839 2,618 2,898 2,898 $ 3,166 100‐464‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 12,288 15,849 15,112 13,744 13,744 $ 15,495 100‐464‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) 235 246 231 269 269 $ 295 100‐464‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 4,238 5,838 798 6,000 6,000 $ 6,000 100‐464‐43031 Contractual Services 8,394 16,839 10,028 15,000 15,000 $ 15,000 100‐464‐43404 Public Utilities 10,401 9,953 16,518 10,000 10,000 $ 12,000 100‐464‐43420 Taxes & Fees 60 60 2,104 500 500 $ 500
100‐464‐45100 Bus Shelter Maintenance 115 1,210 237 1,500 1,500 $ 1,500 TOTAL EXPENSES 99,841 130,539 114,355 120,094 123,094 $ 132,017
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 467 OFFICE OF OUTDOOR RECREATION
EXPENSES
100‐467‐40000 Regular Salaries ‐ ‐ 96,761 209,226 213,226 $ 256,497 100‐467‐40111 Temporary Wages ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 100,000 100‐467‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ 13,421 13,421 $ 11,882 100‐467‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ ‐ 33,091 70,656 70,656 $ 117,668 100‐467‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance ‐ ‐ 10,055 14,842 14,842 $ 17,363 100‐467‐41020 PERS (Retirement) ‐ (62) 70,774 76,397 76,397 $ 91,294 100‐467‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 2,000 100‐467‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,500 1,500 $ 1,500100‐467‐42007 Maintenance Supplies ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 100‐467‐43031 Contractual Services ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000100‐467‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi $ 1,500 100‐467‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs $ 5,000
100‐467‐45081 Signage Maintenance $ 25,000
TOTAL EXPENSES ‐ (62) 212,281 396,042 400,042 $ 639,705 DEPT 475 TRANSIT SERVICE
EXPENSES
100‐475‐40000 Regular Salaries 5,049 10,089 11,607 19,861 20,901 $ 21,017 100‐475‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,026 1,026 $ 1,535 100‐475‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 10,808 11,907 11,930 8,378 8,378 $ 9,276 100‐475‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 179 1,159 13,418 1,392 1,392 $ 1,459 100‐475‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 3,506 8,054 9,380 7,226 7,226 $ 7,834 100‐475‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 846 1,045 342 500 500 $ 500 100‐475‐43031 Contractual Services 878,432 889,628 649,502 1,089,535 1,089,535 $ 1,124,579 100‐475‐43404 Public Utilities 145 1,614 4,717 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 100‐475‐45224 Street Sign Replacement ‐ ‐ 2,790 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 897,668 923,219 1,934,523 1,132,918 2,033,958 $ 1,171,200
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 480 TOURISM & BUS DEV'T
EXPENSES
100‐480‐43031 Contractual Services 256,264 29,733 61,803 50,000 100,000 $ 100,000 100‐480‐44810 Promotion & Tourism 2,439,600 1,819,850 2,716,250 2,339,200 2,339,200 $ 2,300,000 100‐480‐49999 Transfers Out ‐ Tourism ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,770,000 2,770,000 $ 492,300 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,855,864 2,054,333 5,616,303 2,671,200 5,491,200 $ 2,892,300 DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERSEXPENSES
100‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 10,789,898 9,264,681 17,762,279 5,954,085 17,687,279 $ 6,509,350 TOTAL EXPENSES 10,789,898 9,264,681 17,762,279 5,954,085 17,687,279 $ 6,509,350
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 101 ‐ Comprehensive Leave
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
(270,025) ‐ 22,124 116,000 116,000 116,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (270,025) ‐ 22,124 116,000 116,000 116,000
REVENUE
101‐000‐32260 Comprehensive Leave Charge (270,025) ‐ 22,124 116,000 116,000 116,000 TOTAL REVENUE (270,025) ‐ 22,124 116,000 116,000 116,000 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORHSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 105 ‐ COVID‐19
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
1,300,000 1,250,154 ‐ 1,008,709 1,300,000 1,254,000 608,362 2,054,286 ‐ 129,604 ‐ 1,140,250691,638 (804,132) ‐ 879,105 159,750 1,254,000
REVENUE
105‐000‐34211 FEMA/COVID‐19 Relief ‐ 59,824 ‐ 984,994 ‐ 1,254,000 TOTAL REVENUE 1,300,000 1,250,154 ‐ 1,008,709 1,300,000 1,254,000 DEPT 405 COVID‐19 Operations
EXPENSES
105‐405‐40000 Regular Salaries 148,326 203,238 ‐ 11,431 125,000 105‐405‐40111 Temporary Wages 2,768 ‐ 10,303 ‐ 3,000 105‐405‐40113 Overtime Wages 1,607 4,688 ‐ 259 2,000 105‐405‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 31 ‐ 175 ‐ 250 105‐405‐42030 Special Operational 12,652 30,084 ‐ 41,027 10,000 105‐405‐43031 Contractual Services 288,509 324,247 ‐ 59,059 500,000 105‐405‐43404 Public Utilities ‐ 2,531 ‐ 2,622 105‐405‐44220 Community Support Fund 100,000 1,301,238 ‐ 12,054 500,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 608,362 1,931,286 ‐ 129,604 ‐ 1,140,250
TOML BUDGET WORHSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 205 ‐ Solid Waste
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
286,175 196,460 253,375 537,500 537,500 250,000
734,345 304,264 255,565 260,350 260,910 92,677
(448,169) (107,805) (2,189) 277,150 276,590 157,323
REVENUE205‐000‐31205 AB 939 FEE 180,000 45,000 89,940 90,000 90,000 150,000 205‐000‐31206 Solid Waste Parcel Fee‐County 72,595 ‐ 106,187 100,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL REVENUE 286,175 196,460 253,375 537,500 537,500 250,000 DEPT 490 Solid Waste
EXPENSES
205‐490‐40000 Regular Salaries 4,350 8,255 5,426 22,753 23,313 6,073 205‐490‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ 982 982 210 205‐490‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,510 4,510 1,961 205‐490‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 179 ‐ ‐ 1,582 1,582 407205‐490‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 698 ‐ 6,179 8,851 8,851 2,354 205‐490‐42030 Special Operational ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,683 ‐ 10,000 205‐490‐43030 Professional Services 24,301 ‐ 3,076 30,000 30,000 10,000 205‐490‐43031 Contractual Services 22,903 215,703 114,714 141,672 141,672 11,672 205‐490‐43404 Public Utilities 5,708 26,726 45,502 50,000 50,000 50,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 734,345 304,264 255,565 260,350 260,910 92,677
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 210 ‐ Gas Tax
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
4,642,545 5,300,461 5,025,068 4,922,284 4,922,284 $ 5,282,119 3,940,610 4,100,185 5,273,378 4,922,285 6,009,016 $ 5,432,119 701,935 1,200,276 (248,310) (1) (1,086,732) $ (150,000)
REVENUE
210‐000‐31602 Charges for Services 26,567 ‐ 34,238 10,000 10,000 $ 10,000 210‐000‐35404 State Gas Tax 2103 56,776 54,935 55,085 72,997 72,997 $ 72,997 210‐000‐35406 State Gas Tax 2105 42,002 41,949 38,312 47,327 47,327 $ 47,327 210‐000‐35408 State Gas Tax 2106 53,133 53,172 48,779 58,018 58,018 $ 58,018 210‐000‐35410 State Gas Tax 2107 53,037 56,765 44,374 50,000 50,000 $ 50,000 210‐000‐35412 State Gas Tax 2107 Snow 1,999,871 2,186,069 1,531,985 1,500,000 1,500,000 $ 1,750,000 210‐000‐35414 State Gas Tax 2107.5 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 210‐000‐35416 State Gas Tax RMRA (SB‐1) 142,612 139,710 135,713 155,514 155,514 $ 187,691 210‐000‐37100 Refunds and Rebates ‐ 16,600 39,063 13,000 13,000 $ 13,000 210‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 2,232,652 2,695,390 2,953,428 3,013,428 3,013,428 $ 3,091,086 TOTAL REVENUE 4,642,545 5,300,461 5,025,068 4,922,284 4,922,284 $ 5,282,119 DEPT 450 STREET MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES
210‐450‐40000 Regular Salaries 281,704 282,122 236,174 351,040 367,327 $ 354,578210‐450‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (16,430) ‐ (986) 7,626 7,626 $ 15,191210‐450‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 81,464 93,653 83,234 141,181 141,181 $ 165,785210‐450‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 13,875 21,939 29,039 23,910 23,910 $ 23,923210‐450‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 90,016 118,096 116,450 122,340 122,340 $ 123,213210‐450‐42002 Office Supplies 10 ‐ ‐ 200 200 $ 200 210‐450‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 2,136 1,640 1,320 3,500 3,500 $ 3,500 210‐450‐42022 Street Maintenance Supplies 6,099 2,314 1,669 3,000 3,000 $ 10,000210‐450‐42025 Traffic Safety Supplies 42,506 6,238 26,952 35,000 35,000 $ 35,000210‐450‐43031 Contractual Services 36,340 447,418 798,839 450,000 450,000 $ 475,000210‐450‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs ‐ ‐ 65 ‐ ‐ $ 2,000 210‐450‐43404 Public Utilities 17,703 11,079 8,334 11,000 11,000 $ 15,000 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
210‐450‐43420 Taxes & Fees 5,004 26,512 9,034 8,000 8,000 $ 12,000210‐450‐45200 Traffic Signal Maintenance 2,624 ‐ 452 2,000 2,000 $ 6,000 210‐450‐45220 Street Lights ‐ 693 2,845 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000210‐450‐45224 Street Sign Replacement 16,644 31,144 31,403 31,000 31,000 $ 35,000 210‐450‐45228 Road, Curbs, Gutter Rehab 69,595 99,007 64,836 580,000 580,000 $ 580,000 210‐450‐46200 Machinery & Equip ‐ Non Cap 114 22,310 436 4,500 4,500 $ 4,500 TOTAL EXPENSES 969,538 1,181,166 1,423,285 1,777,297 1,793,584 $ 1,863,889 DEPT 452 SNOW REMOVAL
EXPENSES
210‐452‐40000 Regular Salaries 386,935 436,989 439,486 440,974 461,018 $ 463,621210‐452‐40111 Temporary Wages 67,456 50,187 26,207 80,375 80,375 $ 82,142210‐452‐40113 Overtime Wages 115,731 108,382 86,463 125,000 125,000 $ 125,000210‐452‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (19,171) ‐ (2,164) 11,333 11,333 $ 20,135210‐452‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 136,491 148,579 149,710 181,580 181,580 $ 208,747210‐452‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 20,914 25,813 32,233 30,152 30,152 $ 31,297 210‐452‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 133,461 143,625 164,454 153,979 153,979 $ 161,140 210‐452‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) 1,108 758 492 1,585 1,585 $ 1,619 210‐452‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 8,229 9,098 6,215 10,000 10,000 $ 10,000 210‐452‐42022 Street Maintenance Supplies 1,490 797 6,685 10,000 10,000 $ 10,000 210‐452‐42025 Traffic Safety Supplies 78,495 78,182 13,347 97,000 97,000 $ 135,000210‐452‐42030 Special Operational 8,665 8,845 8,523 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000 210‐452‐43031 Contractual Services 123,494 123,989 116,355 200,000 200,000 $ 200,000 210‐452‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 390 ‐ 49 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 210‐452‐43404 Public Utilities 41,399 42,176 57,667 43,000 43,000 $ 45,000 210‐452‐45200 Traffic Signal Maintenance 4,700 ‐ 26 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 210‐452‐45220 Street Lights 15 562 1,270 2,500 2,500 $ 2,500 210‐452‐46200 Machinery & Equip ‐ Non Cap 1,792 1,846 1,939 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,120,282 1,180,015 1,111,070 1,400,478 1,420,522 $ 1,509,201
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 454 SUMMER EQUIP GARAGE
EXPENSES
210‐454‐42002 Office Supplies ‐ ‐ 402 700 700 $ 700 210‐454‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 2,125 3,016 2,061 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000 210‐454‐42016 Gasoline & Diesel 35,835 34,548 40,331 42,000 42,000 $ 60,000 210‐454‐42017 Vehicle Maintenance Parts 55,481 38,045 36,230 35,000 35,000 $ 40,000 210‐454‐43031 Contractual Services 3,661 2,834 1,459 4,000 4,000 $ 4,000 210‐454‐43060 Garage Vehicle Service 66,961 61,920 59,486 80,000 80,000 $ 80,000 210‐454‐43066 Vehicle & Equip Replacement 160,065 190,399 177,496 166,793 166,793 $ 179,737 210‐454‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 778 2,428 2,416 6,000 6,000 $ 6,000 210‐454‐46200 Machinery & Equip ‐ Non Cap 2,714 4,000 1,201 4,000 4,000 $ 4,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 328,128 337,570 320,680 340,793 340,793 $ 376,737 DEPT 455 WINTER EQUIP GARAGE
EXPENSES
210‐455‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 4,092 4,719 5,862 5,500 5,500 $ 5,500 210‐455‐42016 Gasoline & Diesel 77,858 78,920 136,967 70,000 70,000 $ 90,000 210‐455‐42017 Vehicle Maintenance Parts 209,529 149,754 125,355 190,000 190,000 $ 210,000 210‐455‐42030 Special Operational 72 ‐ 59 100 100 $ 100 210‐455‐43031 Contractual Services 78 7,160 5,602 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 210‐455‐43060 Garage Vehicle Service 184,625 188,874 167,261 160,000 160,000 $ 160,000 210‐455‐43066 Vehicle & Equip Replacement 508,181 624,828 560,524 560,524 560,524 $ 590,627 210‐455‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 3,506 4,491 6,891 8,500 8,500 $ 8,500 210‐455‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,000 1,000 $ 1,000 210‐455‐46200 Machinery & Equip ‐ Non Cap 2,321 8,051 3,184 4,000 4,000 $ 4,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 990,261 1,066,796 1,011,703 1,004,624 1,004,624 $ 1,074,727
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 456 GARAGE OPERATIONS
EXPENSES
210‐456‐40000 Regular Salaries 17,569 17,857 16,203 5,646 6,046 $ 6,488210‐456‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 37210‐456‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 4,196 4,628 4,579 1,714 1,714 $ 1,861210‐456‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 905 710 2,618 386 386 $ 422 210‐456‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 5,273 4,251 1,505 1,833 1,833 $ 2,066210‐456‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 5,221 5,297 5,253 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 210‐456‐43031 Contractual Services 32,927 20,503 27,406 32,000 32,000 $ 32,000 210‐456‐43404 Public Utilities 67,164 94,773 88,115 70,000 70,000 $ 70,000 210‐456‐45060 Gen'l Facilities Maint ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,000 1,000 $ 1,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 135,770 150,807 148,317 117,579 117,979 $ 118,874 DEPT 457 PROMENADE MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES
210‐457‐42007 Maintenance Supplies ‐ ‐ 187 1,000 1,000 $ 1,000 210‐457‐43031 Contractual Services 49,195 57,464 48,137 48,000 48,000 $ 48,000 210‐457‐43404 Public Utilities 1,602 ‐ ‐ 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 50,796 57,464 48,323 51,000 51,000 $ 51,000 DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERSEXPENSES210‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 345,835 126,367 1,210,000 230,514 1,280,514 $ 437,691 TOTAL EXPENSES 345,835 126,367 1,210,000 230,514 1,280,514 $ 437,691
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 215 ‐ Measure R Trails
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
359,661 451,032 508,864 445,000 445,000 $ 250,000
428,451 648,352 431,679 445,000 445,000 $ 250,000
(68,790) (197,320) ‐ 77,184 ‐ ‐ $
REVENUE
215‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 345,000 405,000 420,000 445,000 445,000 $ 250,000 TOTAL REVENUE 359,661 451,032 508,864 445,000 445,000 $ 250,000 DEPT 511 MEASURE R TRAILS
EXPENSES
215‐511‐40000 Regular Salaries 97,129 111,457 ‐ 1,437 ‐ $ 18,277215‐511‐40111 Temporary Wages 56,036 62,307 51,206 78,456 78,456 $ 57,718 215‐511‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (8,384) ‐ 831 ‐ ‐ $ 479 215‐511‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 31,424 35,535 ‐ 1,309 ‐ $ 6,328215‐511‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 5,181 ‐ 6,627 ‐ ‐ $ 1,213 215‐511‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 33,887 39,284 ‐ 826 ‐ $ 5,939 215‐511‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) 1,271 1,457 727 1,547 1,547 $ 1,138 215‐511‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 7,076 6,259 13,942 7,000 7,000 $ 7,000 215‐511‐42026 Trail Facility Supplies 5,942 19,910 3,717 6,000 6,000 $ 6,000 215‐511‐43031 Contractual Services 180,856 340,922 197,523 198,398 198,398 $ 142,308 215‐511‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 215‐511‐43404 Public Utilities 2,014 2,178 51 1,000 1,000 $ 1,000 215‐511‐48900 Computer Software ‐ Capital 660 ‐ ‐ 600 600 $ 600 TOTAL EXPENSES 428,451 648,352 281,679 295,001 295,001 $ 250,000 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 216 ‐ Measure R
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
1,558,411 1,673,707 1,482,044 1,300,000 1,300,000 $ 1,500,000 2,696,654 966,753 1,098,849 1,237,983 1,238,463 $ 1,676,497 (1,138,242) 706,955 383,195 62,017 61,537 $ (176,497)
REVENUE
216‐000‐30406 Sales Tax: Measure R 1,354,383 1,640,496 1,473,283 1,300,000 1,300,000 $ 1,500,000 TOTAL REVENUE 1,558,411 1,673,707 1,482,044 1,300,000 1,300,000 $ 1,500,000 DEPT 432 RECREATION PROGRAMS
EXPENSES
216‐432‐42008 Recreation Supplies 3,508 3,173 150 4,000 4,000 $ 4,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 3,508 3,173 150 4,000 4,000 $ 4,000
DEPT 438 PARKS, BLDGS & TRAIL MAINT
EXPENSES
216‐438‐40000 Regular Salaries 5,169 7,006 6,447 15,113 15,593 216‐438‐40111 Temporary Wages 6,048 10,207 398 5,654 5,654 216‐438‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,063 1,063 216‐438‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ ‐ ‐ 8,085 8,085 216‐438‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 261 715 4,072 1,078 1,078216‐438‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 1,175 2,645 4,211 5,507 5,507 216‐438‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) ‐ ‐ ‐ 110 110 216‐438‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 256 547 403 100 100
216‐438‐45080 Park Grounds & Bldgs Maint 2,025 1,121 435 190 190 216‐438‐46200 Machinery & Equip ‐ Non Cap 500 ‐ 648 100 100 TOTAL EXPENSES 40,970 22,889 15,966 37,000 ‐ 37,480 $ NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 510 MEASURE R
EXPENSES
216‐510‐43031 Contractual Services 202,000 22,000 90,500 155,000 155,000 $ 115,500216‐510‐43100 Audit Services 4,250 4,250 4,500 4,250 4,250 $ 4,250 TOTAL EXPENSES 206,250 26,250 95,000 159,250 159,250 $ 119,750 DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERSEXPENSES
216‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 2,445,925 914,441 987,733 1,037,733 1,037,733 $ 1,552,747 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,445,925 914,441 987,733 1,037,733 1,037,733 $ 1,552,747
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 217 ‐ Measure U
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
874,528 882,218 1,073,016 870,000 870,000 $ 880,000
1,333,691 1,801,693 394,500 836,070 936,070 $ 764,470
(459,163) (919,475) 678,516 33,930 (66,070) $ 115,530
REVENUE
217‐000‐30910 Utility Tax: Telephone 42,234 41,483 34,749 75,000 75,000 $ 75,000 217‐000‐30920 Utility Tax: Electricity 535,653 586,437 595,303 475,000 475,000 $ 485,000 217‐000‐30930 Utility Tax: Gas 230,459 228,693 432,982 320,000 320,000 $ 320,000 TOTAL REVENUE 874,528 882,218 1,073,016 870,000 870,000 $ 880,000 DEPT 432 RECREATION PROGRAMSEXPENSES217‐432‐42008 Recreation Supplies 2,000 ‐ 2,000 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,000 ‐ 2,000 2,000 2,000 $ 2,000 DEPT 513 MEASURE UEXPENSES
217‐513‐43031 Contractual Services 237,441 220,443 245,000 754,820 854,820 $ 658,220 217‐513‐43100 Audit Services 4,250 4,250 4,500 4,250 4,250 $ 4,250 TOTAL EXPENSES 241,691 224,693 249,500 759,070 859,070 $ 662,470 DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
EXPENSES
217‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 1,090,000 1,575,000 145,000 75,000 75,000 $ 100,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,090,000 1,575,000 145,000 75,000 75,000 $ 100,000
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 218 ‐ Tourism Business Improvement District (TBID)
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
4,423,263 4,450,901 5,948,714 4,802,458 4,802,458 $ 6,449,500 4,395,226 4,445,936 5,520,398 4,802,458 4,802,458 $ 6,449,500 28,037 4,965 ‐ 428,316 ‐ ‐ $
REVENUE
218‐000‐32610 TBID ‐ Tier 2 & 3 8,850 8,500 7,900 9,500 9,500 $ 9,500218‐000‐32614 TBID‐Lodging 1,221,325 1,252,035 1,852,612 1,294,668 1,294,668 $ 2,000,000 218‐000‐32618 TBID‐Retail 1,222,987 1,416,305 1,466,082 1,096,800 1,096,800 $ 1,650,000 218‐000‐32622 TBID‐Restaurant 965,171 835,486 1,197,681 1,070,825 1,070,825 $ 1,290,000 218‐000‐32626 TBID‐Ski Area Tickets 958,033 898,846 1,381,862 1,330,665 1,330,665 $ 1,500,000 TOTAL REVENUE 4,423,263 4,450,901 5,948,714 4,802,458 4,802,458 $ 6,449,500 DEPT 415 FINANCEEXPENSES
218‐415‐43031 Contractual Services 88,375 89,018 93,969 96,049 96,049 $ 128,990 TOTAL EXPENSES 88,375 89,018 93,969 96,049 96,049 $ 128,990 DEPT 480 TOURISM & BUS DEV'T
EXPENSES
218‐480‐49020 TBID Pass Through 4,306,850 4,356,918 5,426,428 4,706,409 4,706,409 $ 6,320,510 TOTAL EXPENSES 4,306,850 4,356,918 5,426,428 4,706,409 4,706,409 $ 6,320,510 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 220 ‐ Airport Operations
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
1,900,845 2,356,146 4,784,828 5,341,824 2,931,729 $ 1,827,900 1,582,926 1,681,621 4,785,313 5,341,824 3,132,329 $ 1,872,767 317,919 674,524 ‐ (485) (200,600) $ (44,867)
REVENUE
220‐000‐31610 Facility Rental 2,600 2,400 2,000 2,400 2,400 $ 2,400220‐000‐31806 Car Rental Fee 110,510 25,226 52,001 20,000 25,200 $ 45,000220‐000‐31810 Schat.net Fee 3,093 3,350 2,577 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000220‐000‐31814 Taxi Services 1,936 260 200 3,500 500 $ 3,500 220‐000‐31830 Vehicle Parking: Overnight 7,872 1,698 3,434 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000 220‐000‐31840 Aviation Fuel 16,994 14,198 22,610 14,000 10,000 $ 22,000 220‐000‐31842 Non‐Aviation Fuel 4,165 4,617 4,672 4,000 3,000 $ 5,000220‐000‐31862 Hanger Ground Lease 97,524 100,914 108,171 85,000 100,900 $ 110,000220‐000‐34406 AIP‐45 ACRGP ‐ ‐ ‐ 559,239 ‐ $ 275,000 220‐000‐34407 AIP‐47 FAA Grant ACRGP ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 400,000220‐000‐34438 AIP‐38 Upgrade Segmented Circl 504,505 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 445,000 220‐000‐37002 Interest on Investments 18,651 3,800 1,072 24,000 24,000 $ 4,000 220‐000‐37300 Other Revenue 4,275 6,305 5,540 10,000 10,000 $ 10,000 220‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 291,274 100,000 493,089 321,049 100,000 $ 500,000 TOTAL REVENUE 1,900,845 2,356,146 4,784,828 5,341,824 2,931,729 $ 1,827,900 DEPT 471 AIRPORT ADMIN & OPS
EXPENSES
220‐471‐40000 Regular Salaries 282,835 341,146 360,441 273,859 327,328 $ 372,756220‐471‐40111 Temporary Wages 49,593 57,931 61,212 53,868 55,632 $ 59,851220‐471‐40130 Comprehensive Leave (44,997) ‐ (2,446) 10,841 4,866 $ 18,588220‐471‐41002 Health Ins Premiums 97,270 128,061 126,563 118,325 127,694 $ 148,519220‐471‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 14,534 16,910 16,930 18,979 16,910 $ 25,318220‐471‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 88,184 237,210 113,120 94,979 101,670 $ 130,159 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
220‐471‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) 461 474 467 1,062 1,081 $ 1,180 220‐471‐42002 Office Supplies 893 1,169 682 1,200 1,200 $ 1,500 220‐471‐42005 Postal Supplies & Postage 376 ‐ 1,173 1,000 600 $ 1,000 220‐471‐42006 Uniforms & Personal Equip 10,456 4,872 2,855 8,000 8,000 $ 8,000 220‐471‐42007 Maintenance Supplies 47,066 47,632 37,709 55,000 50,000 $ 60,000 220‐471‐42016 Gasoline & Diesel 19,529 20,728 40,835 30,000 30,000 $ 40,000220‐471‐42017 Vehicle Maintenance Parts 30,106 24,178 33,542 25,000 25,000 $ 25,000 220‐471‐42030 Special Operational 378 ‐ ‐ ‐ 500 $ 500 220‐471‐43031 Contractual Services 109,587 195,960 79,708 175,000 196,000 $ 225,000220‐471‐43060 Garage Vehicle Service 25,413 22,761 18,967 40,000 30,000 $ 45,000 220‐471‐43066 Vehicle & Equip Replacement ‐ ‐ 4,126 ‐ 4,126 $ 4,265 220‐471‐43100 Audit Services 5,750 ‐ 1,425 ‐ 2,000 $ 2,000 220‐471‐43106 Insurance Premiums 10,561 14,132 15,430 14,000 11,000 $ 16,000 220‐471‐43110 Mem'ships, Dues, Subscr, Publi 857 630 1,225 1,000 1,000 $ 2,000 220‐471‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices ‐ ‐ 164 500 500 $ 500 220‐471‐43150 Training, Ed, Conf & Mtgs 10,699 8,149 7,200 8,000 8,000 $ 9,500 220‐471‐43404 Public Utilities 59,583 60,580 68,179 60,000 60,000 $ 65,000 220‐471‐43420 Taxes & Fees 2,661 3,833 2,337 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 220‐471‐45010 Facility Lease 46,579 54,665 74,036 84,000 54,700 $ 86,000 220‐471‐46440 Office Equip & Furniture ‐ ‐ 362 500 500 $ 500 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,116,923 1,462,998 1,075,124 1,086,739 1,121,681 $ 1,353,137 DEPT 531 CAPITAL PROJECTS ‐ OTHEREXPENSES
220‐531‐40000 Regular Salaries 20,158 27,064 14,481 ‐ 83,592 $ 15,532220‐531‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 862 $ 1,180 220‐531‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 18,940 $ 4,853220‐531‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 288 ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,630 $ 1,081220‐531‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 613 ‐ 21,985 ‐ 27,320 $ 5,985220‐531‐43031 Contractual Services 442,487 191,302 3,673,099 4,118,741 2,010,648 $ 491,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 466,002 218,623 3,710,189 4,255,085 2,010,648 $ 519,630
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 240 ‐ Long Valley Pit
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
29,819 15,514 31,046 26,000 26,000 $ 26,000
410 3,529 3,468 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000
29,408 11,985 27,578 23,000 23,000 $ 23,000
REVENUE
240‐000‐31650 Load Charge 27,170 14,690 30,728 26,000 26,000 $ 26,000 240‐000‐37002 Interest on Investments 2,649 824 ‐ 318 ‐ TOTAL REVENUE 29,819 15,514 31,046 26,000 26,000 $ 26,000 DEPT 477 LONG VALLEY PITEXPENSES
240‐477‐43031 Contractual Services ‐ ‐ 129 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 410 3,529 3,468 3,000 3,000 $ 3,000
NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 245 ‐ Housing Programs
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
793,137 2,583,104 8,196,296 570,000 8,170,000 $ 1,015,232 842,641 649,538 2,807,315 570,000 570,000 $ 8,735,000
(49,505) 1,933,566 ‐ 5,388,981 7,600,000 $ (7,719,768)
REVENUE
245‐000‐33020 HELP Program Loan ‐ ‐ 104,574 ‐ ‐ $ 150,000245‐000‐33050 CDBG Grant Revenue 307,699 138,396 ‐ 3,680 ‐ $ 15,000245‐000‐37002 Interest on Investments 8,741 2,711 ‐ 9,146 ‐ $ 8,000245‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 45,000 1,661,000 ‐ 7,600,000 7,600,000 $ 842,232 TOTAL REVENUE 793,137 2,583,104 8,196,296 570,000 8,170,000 $ 1,015,232 DEPT 445 GENERAL FUND HOUSING PROGRAMS
EXPENSES245‐445‐43031 Contractual Services ‐ ‐ ‐ 999,215 ‐ $ 2,000,000245‐445‐48300 Buildings ‐ Capital ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,676,813 ‐ $ 3,200,000 TOTAL EXPENSES ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,676,028 ‐ $ 5,200,000 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 446 HOMEEXPENSES245‐446‐43030 Professional Services 142,000 ‐ 164,005 ‐ ‐ $ 120,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 151,500 ‐ 173,955 ‐ ‐ $ 120,000 DEPT 447 CDBGEXPENSES
245‐447‐40000 Regular Salaries 1,328 4,741 ‐ (1,253) ‐ $ 2,000245‐447‐43031 Contractual Services 386,983 204,568 ‐ 2,342 ‐ $ 12,500245‐447‐43130 Advertising & Legal Notices ‐ 450 ‐ 91 ‐ $ 500 TOTAL EXPENSES 388,412 209,759 ‐ 1,235 ‐ $ 15,000 DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERSEXPENSES
245‐599‐49999 Transfers Out ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 3,400,000 TOTAL EXPENSES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 3,400,000
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 250 ‐ LTC
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
96,762 128,110 38,219 75,000 75,000 $ 75,000
98,102 143,962 63,744 75,183 76,543 $ 75,000
(1,339) (15,852) (25,525) (183) ‐ (1,543) $
REVENUE
250‐000‐35416 LTC: PPM & RPA Planning 96,762 128,110 38,219 75,000 75,000 $ 75,000 TOTAL REVENUE 96,762 128,110 38,219 75,000 75,000 $ 75,000 DEPT 540 STREETS ‐ LTC PROGRAMSEXPENSES
250‐540‐40000 Regular Salaries 5,804 18,687 6,612 33,909 35,269 $ 6,596 250‐540‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,382 1,382 $ 595 250‐540‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ ‐ ‐ 9,694 9,694 $ 542 250‐540‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 86 ‐ 11,924 2,353 2,353 $ 465 250‐540‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 328 8,164 9,187 11,540 11,540 $ 2,694 250‐540‐43031 Contractual Services 89,729 117,112 34,485 16,305 16,305 $ 64,108 TOTAL EXPENSES 98,102 143,962 63,744 75,183 76,543 $ 75,000 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 300 ‐ Capital Projects
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
9,838,566 2,276,091 10,612,046 2,095,640 10,602,453 $ 15,634,400 5,881,069 3,024,665 6,768,697 24,184,781 29,544,572 $ 44,579,461 3,957,498 (748,573) 3,843,349 (22,089,141) (18,942,119) $ (28,945,061)
REVENUE
STIP $ 4,020,050
Trails Program $ 50,000
OHV Green Sticker $ 200,000
Transit Reserve $ 330,000HSIP Grant $ 241,400
Misc $ 6,605,259
300‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 6,455,128 1,840,278 9,791,813 2,095,640 10,602,453 $ 4,187,691 TOTAL REVENUE 9,838,566 2,276,091 10,612,046 2,095,640 10,602,453 $ 15,634,400 DEPT 530 CAPITAL PROJECTS ‐ STREETS
EXPENSES
300‐530‐40000 Regular Salaries 22,148 ‐ 1,085 4,172 4,416 $ 2,325300‐530‐40111 Temporary Wages 20,350 ‐ ‐ 1,508 1,508 $ 15,077300‐530‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ 70 70 $ 57 300‐530‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,226 1,226 $ 1,095300‐530‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 934 ‐ ‐ 283 283 $ 154 300‐530‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 3,527 ‐ 1,104 1,341 1,341 $ 754 300‐530‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) ‐ ‐ ‐ 29 29 $ 293 300‐530‐43031 Contractual Services 669,455 ‐ 16,830 3,901,371 3,901,371 $ 8,747,644 TOTAL EXPENSES 719,128 17,915 1,104 3,910,000 3,910,244 $ 8,767,400 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 531 CAPITAL PROJECTS ‐ OTHEREXPENSES300‐531‐40000 Regular Salaries 17,578 39,841 58,232 143,927 146,661 $ 83,741300‐531‐40111 Temporary Wages 8,943 ‐ 17,268 15,077 15,077 $ 15,077300‐531‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,690 2,690 $ 5,279 300‐531‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ ‐ ‐ 34,317 34,317 $ 28,078 300‐531‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 35 ‐ ‐ 9,774 9,774 $ 5,759300‐531‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 128 ‐ 38,167 47,421 47,421 $ 29,356 300‐531‐41028 PARS (Part Time Retirement) ‐ ‐ ‐ 293 293 $ 293 300‐531‐43031 Contractual Services 4,045,078 2,785,828 6,643,623 20,021,282 25,378,095 $ 35,644,478 TOTAL EXPENSES 4,073,381 2,825,669 6,757,566 20,274,781 25,634,328 $ 35,812,061
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 830 ‐ DIF Town Admin Overhead
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
11,568 15,069 100 11,680 11,680 $ 19,996
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 11,568 15,069 100 11,680 11,680 $ 19,996
REVENUE
830‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 10,967 ‐ 14,852 11,680 11,680 $ 19,996 TOTAL REVENUE 11,568 15,069 100 11,680 11,680 $ 19,996
TOTAL FUND EXPENSES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 831 ‐ DIF General Facilities & Equipment
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
28,378.02 46,313.56 37,923.74 8,985.01 36,000 $ 41,200
1,135.12 ‐ 1,829.77 1,440.00 1,440 $ 1,648 27,242.90 44,483.79 37,923.74 7,545.01 34,560 $ 39,552
REVENUE
831‐000‐32404 DIF General Facilities & Equip 26,815.92 45,744.27 37,672.36 8,977.83 36,000.00 $ 41,200 TOTAL REVENUE 28,378.02 46,313.56 37,923.74 8,985.01 36,000 $ 41,200
TOTAL FUND EXPENSES
DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
EXPENSES
831‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 1,135.12 ‐ 1,829.77 1,440.00 1,440.00 $ 1,648 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,135.12 ‐ 1,829.77 1,440.00 1,440.00 $ 1,648 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 832 ‐ DIF Law Enforcement
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
15,242.25 10,024.55 11,246.16 8,000 8,000 $ 13,400
609.69 ‐ 390.48 320 320 $ 536
14,632.56 9,634.07 11,246.16 7,680 7,680 $ 12,864
REVENUE
832‐000‐32406 DIF‐Police 14,410.48 9,762.00 11,142.34 8,000.00 8,000.00 $ 13,400 TOTAL REVENUE 15,242.25 10,024.55 11,246.16 8,000 8,000 $ 13,400
TOTAL FUND EXPENSES
DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
EXPENSES
832‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 609.69 ‐ 390.48 320 320 $ 536 TOTAL EXPENSES 609.69 ‐ 390.48 320 320 $ 536 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 833 ‐ DIF Storm Drains
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
19,611.25 40,232.54 33,226.86 30,000 30,000 $ 34,200
784.45 ‐ 1,590.68 1,200 1,200 $ 1,368 18,826.80 38,641.86 33,226.86 28,800 28,800 $ 32,832
REVENUE
833‐000‐32408 DIF Storm Drainage 18,361.96 39,767.00 33,019.02 30,000 30,000 $ 34,200 TOTAL REVENUE 19,611.25 40,232.54 33,226.86 30,000 30,000 $ 34,200
TOTAL FUND EXPENSES
DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
EXPENSES
833‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 784.45 ‐ 1,590.68 1,200 1,200 $ 1,368 TOTAL EXPENSES 784.45 ‐ 1,590.68 1,200 1,200 $ 1,368 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 834 ‐ DIF Parks and Recreation
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
21,492 45,728 32,938 32,000 32,000 $ 36,800
75,860 ‐ 1,821 1,280 1,280 $ 1,472 (54,368) 43,907 32,938 30,720 30,720 $ 35,328
REVENUE
834‐000‐32410 DIF Parkland & Recreation 20,585.00 45,520.00 32,813.92 32,000 32,000 $ 36,800 TOTAL REVENUE 21,491.67 45,728.24 32,938.40 32,000.00 32,000 $ 36,800
TOTAL FUND EXPENSES
DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
EXPENSES
834‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 75,859.67 ‐ 1,820.80 1,280 1,280 $ 1,472 TOTAL EXPENSES 75,859.67 ‐ 1,820.80 1,280 1,280 $ 1,472 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 835 ‐ DIF MCOE ‐ Library
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
18,019 26,221 167,180 17,000 17,000 $ 77,500
721 1,029 115,809 17,000 17,000 $ 77,500
17,298 25,192 ‐ 51,371 ‐ ‐ $
REVENUE
835‐000‐32416 DIF MCOE Library Fees 16,504 25,723 167,144 17,000 17,000 $ 77,500 TOTAL REVENUE 18,019 26,221 167,180 17,000 17,000 $ 77,500 DEPT 531 DIF MCOE ‐ LIBRARY
EXPENSES
835‐531‐43031 Contractual Services ‐ ‐ 115,809 16,320 16,320 $ 74,400 TOTAL EXPENSES ‐ ‐ 115,809 16,320 16,320 $ 74,400 DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
EXPENSES
835‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 721 ‐ 1,029 680 680 $ 3,100 TOTAL EXPENSES 721 ‐ 1,029 680 680 $ 3,100 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 836 ‐ DIF Streets & Circulation
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
11,698 12,703 11,626 10,000 10,000 $ 13,200
468 ‐ 499 400 400 $ 528
11,230 12,204 11,626 9,600 9,600 $ 12,672
REVENUE
836‐000‐32412 DIF Vehicle Circulation 11,167 12,483 11,534 10,000 10,000 $ 13,200 TOTAL REVENUE 11,698 12,703 11,626 10,000 10,000 $ 13,200
TOTAL FUND EXPENSES
DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
EXPENSES
836‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 468 ‐ 499 400 400 $ 528 TOTAL EXPENSES 468 ‐ 499 400 400 $ 528 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 837 ‐ DIF MCOE Childcare
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
19,192 37,823 56,495 35,000 35,000 $ 41,600
768 ‐ 1,485 1,400 1,400 $ 1,664 18,424 36,338 56,495 33,600 33,600 $ 39,936
REVENUE
837‐000‐32418 DIF MCOE Child Care 17,096 37,126 56,216 35,000 35,000 $ 41,600 TOTAL REVENUE 19,192 37,823 56,495 35,000 35,000 $ 41,600
TOTAL FUND EXPENSES
DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
EXPENSES
837‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 768 ‐ 1,485 1,400 1,400 $ 1,664 TOTAL EXPENSES 768 ‐ 1,485 1,400 1,400 $ 1,664 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 838 ‐ DIF Fire Facilities, Vehicles & Equipment
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
78,737 90,542 301,365 72,000 72,000 $ 172,500
3,149 ‐ 3,580 72,000 72,000 $ 172,500 75,587 86,962 ‐ 301,365 ‐ ‐ $
REVENUE
838‐000‐32414 DIF Fire District Fees 76,023 89,499 300,876 72,000 72,000 $ 172,500 TOTAL REVENUE 78,737 90,542 301,365 72,000 72,000 $ 172,500 DEPT 531 DIF Fire
EXPENSES
838‐531‐43031 Contractual Services ‐ ‐ ‐ 69,120 69,120 $ 165,600 TOTAL EXPENSES ‐ ‐ ‐ 69,120 69,120 $ 165,600 DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
EXPENSES
838‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 3,149 ‐ 3,580 2,880 2,880 $ 6,900 TOTAL EXPENSES 3,149 ‐ 3,580 2,880 2,880 $ 6,900 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 841 ‐ DIF Transit & Trails
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
61,796 66,844 60,869 52,000 52,000 $ 69,500
2,472 ‐ 2,627 2,080 2,080 $ 2,780 59,324 64,218 60,869 49,920 49,920 $ 66,720
REVENUE
841‐000‐32420 DIF Multi‐Modal Circulation 58,292 65,667 60,381 52,000 52,000 $ 69,500 TOTAL REVENUE 61,796 66,844 60,869 52,000 52,000 $ 69,500
TOTAL FUND EXPENSES
DEPT 599 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
EXPENSES
841‐599‐49999 Transfers Out 2,472 ‐ 2,627 2,080 2,080 $ 2,780 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,472 ‐ 2,627 2,080 2,080 $ 2,780 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 850 ‐ Juniper Ridge ‐ AD 1993‐1
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
91,331 71,116 47,049 64,540 64,540 $ 73,000
59,450 43,211 65,586 102,300 102,300 $ 73,700
31,881 27,905 (18,537) (37,760) (37,760) $ (700)
REVENUE
850‐000‐30202 Property Tax Secured ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 850‐000‐30280 Tax Assessment 45,671 48,138 46,803 48,000 48,000 $ 48,000 850‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 43,779 ‐ 22,325 16,540 16,540 $ 25,000 TOTAL REVENUE 91,331 71,116 47,049 64,540 64,540 $ 73,000 DEPT 450 STREET MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES
850‐450‐43031 Contractual Services 14,339 5,827 20,479 42,300 42,300 $ 28,700 TOTAL EXPENSES 14,703 5,962 22,282 42,300 42,300 $ 28,700 DEPT 452 SNOW REMOVAL
EXPENSES
850‐452‐43031 Contractual Services 44,747 37,249 43,220 60,000 60,000 $ 45,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 44,747 37,249 43,220 60,000 60,000 $ 45,000 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 853 ‐ Bluffs ‐ Maint Dist 1996‐4
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
33,617 23,755 164,131 182,720 182,720 $ 189,900
51,608 47,042 50,569 182,900 182,900 $ 292,695
(17,991) (23,287) 113,562 (180) (180) $ (102,795)
REVENUE
853‐000‐30280 Tax Assessment ‐ ‐ 163,815 165,900 165,900 $ 165,900 853‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 29,351 ‐ 22,702 16,820 16,820 $ 24,000 TOTAL REVENUE 33,617 23,755 164,131 182,720 182,720 $ 189,900 DEPT 450 STREET MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES
853‐450‐43031 Contractual Services 6,038 7,746 3,745 122,900 122,900 $ 250,695 TOTAL EXPENSES 6,105 7,823 3,942 122,900 122,900 $ 250,695 DEPT 452 SNOW REMOVAL
EXPENSES
853‐452‐43031 Contractual Services 45,503 39,219 45,847 60,000 60,000 $ 42,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 45,503 39,219 45,847 60,000 60,000 $ 42,000 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 854 ‐ North Village CFD 2001‐1
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
535,447 547,029 531,930 520,438 520,438 $ 568,396
522,468 548,741 522,748 518,938 518,938 $ 689,008
12,979 (1,712) 9,182 1,500 1,500 $ (120,612)
REVENUE
854‐000‐30280 Tax Assessment 528,917 545,899 531,488 518,938 518,938 $ 568,396 854‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 25,000 TOTAL REVENUE 535,447 547,029 531,930 520,438 520,438 $ 568,396 DEPT 452 SNOW REMOVAL
EXPENSES
854‐452‐43031 Contractual Services ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 40,000 TOTAL EXPENSES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 40,000 DEPT 531 CAPITAL PROJECTS ‐ OTHER
EXPENSES
854‐531‐43031 Contractual Services 10,561 31,483 7,340 6,100 6,100 $ 134,872 TOTAL EXPENSES 10,561 31,483 7,340 6,100 6,100 $ 134,872 DEPT 590 DEBT SERVICEEXPENSES
854‐590‐43031 Contractual Services ‐ 2,514 ‐ 86,418 ‐ 854‐590‐49490 Debt Service 511,907 514,744 428,990 512,838 512,838 $ 514,136 TOTAL EXPENSES 511,907 517,258 515,408 512,838 512,838 $ 514,136 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 856 ‐ Old Mammoth Road ‐ BAD 2002‐01
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
269,100 277,231 131,445 156,184 156,184 $ 155,800
120,555 68,291 36,822 170,837 171,845 $ 175,989
148,546 208,940 94,623 (14,653) (15,661) $ (20,189)
REVENUE
856‐000‐30280 Tax Assessment 212,287 238,620 130,118 129,800 129,800 $ 129,800856‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 48,124 ‐ 35,612 26,384 26,384 $ 26,000 TOTAL REVENUE 269,100 277,231 131,445 156,184 156,184 $ 155,800 DEPT 450 STREET MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES
856‐450‐43031 Contractual Services 47,639 12,979 11,877 13,000 13,000 $ 13,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 49,177 14,630 13,324 13,000 13,000 $ 13,000 DEPT 452 SNOW REMOVAL
EXPENSES
856‐452‐40000 Regular Salaries 1,976 1,821 3,603 18,567 19,495 $ 21,532856‐452‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ 453 453 $ 1,041 856‐452‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,149 7,149 $ 8,795856‐452‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 110 ‐ 549 1,268 1,268 $ 1,460 856‐452‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 457 2,031 4,951 6,544 6,544 $ 7,641856‐452‐43031 Contractual Services 67,589 43,992 9,415 46,019 46,019 $ 46,019 TOTAL EXPENSES 71,378 53,662 19,581 80,000 80,928 $ 86,489 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
DEPT 531 Capital Projects ‐ OtherEXPENSES856‐531‐40000 Regular Salaries ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,555 1,635 $ 931 856‐531‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 20 856‐531‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ ‐ ‐ 343 343 $ 186 856‐531‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance ‐ ‐ 3,512 104 104 $ 62 856‐531‐41020 PERS (Retirement) ‐ ‐ 405 492 492 $ 301 856‐531‐43031 Contractual Services ‐ ‐ ‐ 75,000 75,000 $ 75,000 TOTAL EXPENSES ‐ ‐ 3,917 77,837 77,917 $ 76,500
BUDGET 2022‐23 Fund 857 ‐ North Village ‐ BAD 2002‐2
ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME
ACTUAL
FY2019‐20
ACTUAL
FY20‐21
YEAR‐TO‐DATE
FY21‐22
APPROVED BUDGET
FY21‐22
MODIFIED
BUDGET FY21‐22
COUNCIL APPROVED
BUDGET FY22‐23
195,414 24,240 49,957 65,556 65,556 $ 79,260
51,202 224,526 27,476 92,300 93,148 $ 110,538
144,212 (200,285) 22,481 (26,744) (27,592) $ (31,278)
REVENUE
857‐000‐30280 Tax Assessment 148,796 502 48,972 50,300 50,300 $ 54,260 857‐000‐39999 Interfund Transfers In 33,952 ‐ 20,591 15,256 15,256 $ 25,000 TOTAL REVENUE 195,414 24,240 49,957 65,556 65,556 $ 79,260 161,461.55 3,649.42 49,957.31 50,300.00 50,300.00 $ 54,260 DEPT 450 STREET MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES
857‐450‐43031 Contractual Services 7,081 9,079 8,083 14,500 14,500 $ 27,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 9,931 12,668 9,502 14,500 14,500 $ 27,000 DEPT 452 SNOW REMOVAL
EXPENSES
857‐452‐40000 Regular Salaries 2,013 1,471 2,012 17,433 18,281 $ 18,831857‐452‐40130 Comprehensive Leave ‐ ‐ ‐ 505 505 $ 841 857‐452‐41002 Health Ins Premiums ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,890 6,890 $ 8,277857‐452‐41012 Workers Comp Insurance 120 ‐ 396 1,196 1,196 $ 1,273 857‐452‐41020 PERS (Retirement) 468 1,465 4,670 6,075 6,075 $ 6,516857‐452‐45440 Snow Removal & Maint ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ $ 40,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 41,271 24,694 17,974 70,000 70,848 $ 75,738 NET TOML REV ‐ EXP
TOML BUDGET WORKSHEET
TOTAL TOML REVENUE
TOTAL TOML EXPENDITURES