Agenda packet — Mammoth Lakes City Council, April 3, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 10 AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 54.4 106.5 52.1 AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 54.4 106.5 52.1 AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C1 3870.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 56.6 103.6 47
AT&T C1 3870.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 56.6 103.7 47.1 AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 56.6 103.7 47.1 AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 56.6 103.8 47.2 AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 56.6 103.8 47.2 AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 56.6 103.8 47.2 AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C1 3870.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 56.6 101.8 45.2 AT&T C1 3870.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 56.6 101.9 45.3 AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 56.6 101.9 45.3 AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 56.6 102 45.4
AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 45.6 154.2 108.6 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 56.6 102.3 45.7 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 56.6 103.6 47 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 56.6 100.5 43.9 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 56.6 100.5 43.9 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 54.4 111 56.6 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 56.6 102.3 45.7 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 56.6 103.6 47 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 56.6 100.5 43.9 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 56.6 100.5 43.9 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 54.4 101 46.6 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 56.6 102.4 45.8 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 56.6 103.7 47.1 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 56.6 100.6 44 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 56.6 100.6 44 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 54.4 101 46.6 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 56.6 102.4 45.8 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 56.6 103.7 47.1 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 56.6 100.6 44 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 56.6 100.6 44 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 54.4 101 46.6 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 56.6 102.5 45.9 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 56.6 103.8 47.2

Page 233 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 11 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 56.6 100.7 44.1 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 56.6 100.7 44.1 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 56.6 101.7 45.1 AT&T 1 793.000000 AT&T 1 763.000000 58.3 97 38.7
AT&T 1 793.000000 AT&T 1 763.000000 58.3 97 38.7
AT&T 1 793.000000 AT&T 1 763.000000 58.3 97 38.7
AT&T 1 1735.000000 AT&T 1 1955.000000 54.6 172.2 117.6
AT&T 1 1735.000000 AT&T 1 1955.000000 54.6 169.5 114.9
AT&T 1 1735.000000 AT&T 1 1955.000000 54.6 172.9 118.3
AT&T 1 2310.000000 AT&T 1 2355.000000 53.4 96.5 43.1
AT&T 1 2310.000000 AT&T 1 2355.000000 53.4 96.5 43.1
AT&T 1 2310.000000 AT&T 1 2355.000000 53.4 96.5 43.1
AT&T MW1 11675.000000 AT&T MW1 10850.000000 3.6 100.8 97.2 County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 153.860000
County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 155.760000 61.1 96.3 35.2
County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 153.860000
MLFD TAC 3
(Channel #3) CH 3 153.950000 79.8 107.8 28
CMD Lincoln -
MLFD
Command
Lincoln
(Channel #2) CH 2 155.145000
County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 155.760000 73.7 105 31.3
CMD Lincoln -
MLFD
Command
Lincoln
(Channel #2) CH 2 155.145000

CLEMARS - CA
Law Enf Mutual
Aid (Channel
#14) CH 14 154.920000 78.9 101.9 23
MLFD TAC 3
(Channel #3) CH 3 153.950000

CLEMARS - CA
Law Enf Mutual
Aid (Channel
#14) CH 14 154.920000 69.7 98.8 29.1
USFS INF_INF
North (Channel
#5) CH 5 173.800000
USFS INF_INF
North (Channel
#5) CH 5 165.012500 39.2 75 35.8

MLPD - MLPD
Dispatch
(Channel #4) CH 4 155.595000
County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 155.760000 79.3 96.4 17.1

MLPD - MLPD
Dispatch
(Channel #4) CH 4 155.595000

CLEMARS - CA
Law Enf Mutual
Aid (Channel
#14) CH 14 154.920000 72.8 96.7 23.9

CLEMARS - CA
Law Enf Mutual
Aid (Channel
#14) CH 14 154.920000
County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 155.760000 70.9 100.2 29.3
Analysis Results: No transmitter noise interference problems were predicted that were determined to be system performance limiting to any operators analyzed in this report. All calculations yielded results that determined, based upon the listed configurations, that there was adequate isolation between all analyzed transmitters and receivers either through physical separation, antenna broadcast pattern gain roll off or filtering and isolation devices considered to be part of the standard transmitter / receiver configuration deployed by the equipment manufacturers listed as part of this analysis.

Page 234 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 12

6.0 Receiver Desensitization Analysis
Receiver desensitization interference occurs when an undesired signal from a nearby "offfrequency" transmitter is sufficiently close to a receiver's operating frequency. The signal may get through the RF selectivity of the receiver. If this undesired signal is of sufficient amplitude, the receiver's critical voltage and current levels are altered and the performance of the receiver is degraded at its operating frequency. The gain of the receiver is reduced, thereby reducing the performance of the receiver.

A transmitter can be operating several megahertz away from the receiver frequency and/or its antenna can be located several thousand feet from the receiver's antenna and still cause interference.

The analysis predicts each transmitter’s signal level present at the input of each receiver. It takes into account the transmitter’s power output, frequency separation, transmission line losses, filters, duplexers, combiners, isolators, multi-couplers and other RF devices that are present in both systems. Additionally, the analysis considers the antenna separation space loss, horizontal and vertical gain components of the antennas as well as how they are mounted on the structure. The gain components are derived from antenna pattern data published by each manufacturer.

The analysis determines how much isolation is required, if any, to prevent receiver performance degradation caused by receiver desensitization interference. The Table below depicts the results of this analysis. For each receiver, the transmitter that has the worst-case impact is displayed. The Signal Margin represents the margin in dB, before the receiver’s performance is degraded. A negative number indicates that the performance is degraded and the value indicates how much additional isolation is required to prevent receiver performance degradation.

Receiver
Provider
Receive
Channel
Receive
Frequency
(MHz)
Transmitter
Provider
Transmit
Channel
Transmit
Frequency
(MHz)
Attn
Required
(dB)
Attn
Provided
(dB)
Signal
Margin
(dB)
AT&T 1 710.000000 AT&T 1 740.000000 16 97 81
AT&T 1 710.000000 AT&T 1 740.000000 16 97 81
AT&T 1 710.000000 AT&T 1 740.000000 16 97 81
AT&T 2 830.000000 AT&T 2 875.000000 23.6 96.8 73.2
AT&T 2 830.000000 AT&T 2 875.000000 23.6 96.8 73.2
AT&T 2 830.000000 AT&T 2 875.000000 23.6 96.8 73.2
AT&T 1 1875.000000 AT&T 1 1955.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T 1 1875.000000 AT&T 1 1955.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T 1 1875.000000 AT&T 1 1955.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T 1 1900.000000 AT&T 1 1985.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T 1 1900.000000 AT&T 1 1985.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T 1 1900.000000 AT&T 1 1985.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T C1 3870.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C1 3870.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 24 101.8 77.8
AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 24 101.9 77.9
AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 24 101.9 77.9
AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 24 102 78

Page 235 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 13 AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 19 96.5 77.5
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C1 3870.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 24 103.6 79.6
AT&T C1 3870.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 24 103.7 79.7
AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 24 103.7 79.7
AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 24 103.8 79.8
AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 24 103.8 79.8
AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 24 103.8 79.8
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C1 3870.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 24 101.8 77.8
AT&T C1 3870.000000 AT&T C1 3870.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 24 101.9 77.9
AT&T C2 3890.000000 AT&T C2 3890.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 24 101.9 77.9
AT&T C3 3910.000000 AT&T C3 3910.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C4 3930.000000 AT&T C4 3930.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C5 3950.000000 AT&T C5 3950.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 24 102 78
AT&T C6 3970.000000 AT&T C6 3970.000000 24 102 78
AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 AT&T DoD_1 3460.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 AT&T DoD_2 3480.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 AT&T DoD_3 3500.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 AT&T DoD_4 3520.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 AT&T DoD_5 3540.000000 24 101.7 77.7 AT&T 1 793.000000 AT&T 1 763.000000 22.3 97 74.7
AT&T 1 793.000000 AT&T 1 763.000000 22.3 97 74.7
AT&T 1 793.000000 AT&T 1 763.000000 22.3 97 74.7
AT&T 1 1735.000000 AT&T 1 1955.000000 19 172.2 153.2
AT&T 1 1735.000000 AT&T 1 1955.000000 19 169.5 150.5
AT&T 1 1735.000000 AT&T 1 1955.000000 19 172.9 153.9
AT&T 1 2310.000000 AT&T 1 2355.000000 17.8 96.5 78.7
AT&T 1 2310.000000 AT&T 1 2355.000000 17.8 96.5 78.7
AT&T 1 2310.000000 AT&T 1 2355.000000 17.8 96.5 78.7
AT&T MW1 11675.000000 AT&T MW1 10850.000000 32 100.8 68.8 County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 153.860000
County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 155.760000 42.3 96.2 53.9
County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 153.860000
MLFD TAC 3
(Channel #3) CH 3 153.950000 64 97.8 33.8

Page 236 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 14 CMD Lincoln -
MLFD
Command
Lincoln
(Channel #2) CH 2 155.145000

CLEMARS - CA
Law Enf Mutual
Aid (Channel
#14) CH 14 154.920000 63.5 101.9 38.4
MLFD TAC 3
(Channel #3) CH 3 153.950000

CLEMARS - CA
Law Enf Mutual
Aid (Channel
#14) CH 14 154.920000 55.8 98.8 43
USFS INF_INF
North (Channel
#5) CH 5 173.800000
USFS INF_INF
North (Channel
#5) CH 5 165.012500 4.5 75 70.5

MLPD - MLPD
Dispatch
(Channel #4) CH 4 155.595000
County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 155.760000 63.7 96.4 32.7

CLEMARS - CA
Law Enf Mutual
Aid (Channel
#14) CH 14 154.920000
County Fire -
Mono Co Fire
Dispatch
(Channel 1) CH 1 155.760000 57.9 90.2 32.3
Analysis Results: No receiver desensitization interference problems were predicted that were determined to be system performance limiting to any operators analyzed in this report. All calculations yielded results that determined, based upon the listed configurations, that there was adequate isolation between all analyzed transmitters and receivers either through physical separation, antenna broadcast pattern gain roll off or filtering and isolation devices considered to be part of the standard transmitter / receiver configuration deployed by the equipment manufacturers listed as part of this analysis.

Page 237 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 15

7.0 Intermodulation Interference Analysis
There are three basic categories of Intermodulation (IM) interference. They are receiver produced, transmitter produced, and "other" radiated IM. Transmitter produced IM is the result of one or more transmitters impressing a signal in the non-linear final output stage circuitry of another transmitter, usually via antenna coupling. The IM product frequency is then re-radiated from the transmitter's antenna. Receiver produced IM is the result of two or more transmitter signals mixing in a receiver RF amplifier or mixer stage when operating in a non-linear range. "Other" radiated IM is the result of transmitter signals mixing in other non-linear junctions. These junctions are usually metallic, such as rusty bolts on a tower, dissimilar metallic junctions, or other non-linear metallic junctions in the area. IM products can also be caused by non-linearity in the transmission system such as antenna, transmission line, or connectors.

Communication sites with co-located transmitters usually have RF coupling between each transmitter and antenna system. This results in the signals of each transmitter entering the nonlinear final output (PA) circuitry of the other transmitters. When intermodulation (IM) products are created in the output circuitry and they fall within the passband of the final amplifier, the IM products are re-radiated and may interfere with receivers at the same site or at other nearby sites.

Additionally, these strong transmitter signals may directly enter a receiver and drive the RF amplifier into a nonlinear operation, or if not filtered effectively by the receiver input circuitry, these signals could mix in the nonlinear circuitry of the receiver front-end or mixer, creating IM products directly in the receiver.

The frequencies of IM mixing are known as nonlinear distortions. The images below depict how these IM products are derived when passing through a nonlinear junction/system.

Page 238 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 16 Below are the mathematical formulae for common IM products. IM products are classified by their "order" (2nd, 3rd, 4th, ...Nth). Some of the more common forms of mixing are illustrated in the following examples. Note that the "A", "B", and "C" designations are the mixing frequencies. The numerical number assigned to the letter designation indicates the harmonic relationship of the frequency. Thus, 2A means the 2nd harmonic of frequency A.

Order Mixing Formulae
First A=B, A=C, etc.

Second A ± B, A ± C, etc.

Third A + B - C, A ± 2B, 2A ± B, etc.

Fourth A ± 3B, 2A ± 2B, 3A ± B, etc.

Fifth A ± 4B, 2A ± 3B, 3A ± 2B, 4A ± B, etc.

Sixth A ± 3B ± 2C, 2A ± 2B ± 2C, 3A ± 2B ± C, etc.

Seventh A ± 6B, 2A ± 5B, 3A ± 4B, 4A ± 3B, 5A ± 2B, etc.

Eighth A ± 7B, 2A ± 6B, 3A ± 5B, 4A ± 4B, 5A ± 3B, 6A ± 2B, etc.

Ninth A ± 8B, 2A ± 7B, 3A ± 6B, 4A ± 5B, 5A ± 4B, 6A ± 3B, etc.

The above IM product formulae are just a few of the many possible combinations. When there are four frequencies involved at one time, the mixing possibilities increase tremendously. Not all of the mixing possibilities are significant in creating interference signals. Some fall “out-of-band” of the receiver and the higher order IM products are usually weaker in signal strength.

Page 239 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 17

7.1 Transmitter Generated Intermodulation Analysis
Intermodulation in transmitters occurs when a signal from another transmitter is impressed on the nonlinear final output stage circuitry, usually via antenna coupling. The power level of the IM product is determined by the power level of the incoming extraneous signal from another transmitter and by a conversion loss factor. The conversion loss factor takes into account the mixing efficiency of the transmitter's final output stage. Conversion loss differs with transmitter design, adjustment, frequency separation of the source signals, and with the order of the IM product.

The analysis calculates all possible IM product frequencies that could potentially interfere with receivers at the communications site based on each receiver’s individual bandwidth. It then predicts each IM signal level present at the input of each affected receiver. For each IM frequency, the analysis considers all possible sources of IM generation in the transmitters. For example, if there are four transmitters involve, the analysis will calculate the IM signal level that would be generated in each transmitter. For this example, that would be four possible mixing conditions.

The analysis takes into account the transmitter’s power output, modulation bandwidth, conversion losses, transmission line losses, filters, duplexers, combiners, isolators, multi-couplers and other RF devices that are present in each system. Additionally, the analysis considers the antenna separation space loss, horizontal and vertical gain components of the antennas as well as how they are mounted on the structure. The gain components are derived from antenna pattern data published by each manufacturer.

The analysis determines how much isolation is required to prevent receiver performance degradation for each IM interference signal that occurs. Receivers experiencing transmitter generated intermodulation interference are depicted in the following Table.

Tx 1 Source
Mix Tx Tx 2 Source TX 3 Source Tx 4 Source Tx 5 Source
Intermod
Hit
Affected
Receiver
Attn
Need
(dB)
ID Freq (MHz) ID
Freq
(MHz) ID
Freq
(MHz) ID
Freq
(MHz) ID
Freq
(MHz)
Freq
(MHz) Ord ID
Freq
(MHz)
None
Analysis Results: The above table lists any transmitter generated IM product that is determined to have potential to noticeably degrade the system performance to any receive systems analyzed as part of this study. Based upon the listed configurations for transmitters, receivers, antenna models, antenna patterns and equipment filtering and isolation specifications it has been determined that no transmitter generated intermodulation interference problems were predicted that have the potential to be system performance limiting to any receivers analyzed in this report.

While there are thousands of potential IM product combinations based upon the large number of transmitters located at this facility, all potential products produced yielded values that were below the limit where any noticeable degradation to system performance would be experienced.

Page 240 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 18

7.2 Receiver Generated Intermodulation Analysis
Within a receiver, when two or more strong off-channel signals enter and mix in the receiver and one of the IM product frequencies created coincides with the receiver operating frequency, potential interference results. This internal IM mixing process takes place in the receiver's RF amplifier when it operates in a nonlinear range and/or in the first mixer, which, of course, has been designed to operate as a nonlinear device.

Receivers have a similar conversion loss type factor and receiver performance is commonly described in terms of conversion loss with respect to the 2A - B type products. Here, conversion loss is the ratio of a specified level of A and B to the level of the resulting IM product, when the product is viewed as an equivalent on-channel signal. Receiver conversion loss varies with input levels, AGC action, and product order.

The analysis determines how much isolation is required to prevent receiver performance degradation for each IM interference signal that occurs. Receivers experiencing receiver generated intermodulation interference are depicted in the following Table.

Tx 1 Source Tx 2 Source TX 3 Source Tx 4 Source Tx 5 Source Intermod
Hit
Affected
Receiver
Attn
Need
(dB)
ID
Freq
(MHz) ID
Freq
(MHz) ID
Freq
(MHz) ID
Freq
(MHz) ID
Freq
(MHz)
Freq
(MHz) Ord ID
Freq
(MHz)
None
Analysis Results: The above table lists any receiver generated IM product that is determined to have potential to noticeably degrade the system performance to any receive systems analyzed as part of this study. Based upon the listed configurations for transmitters, receivers, antenna models, antenna patterns and equipment filtering and isolation specifications it has been determined that no receiver generated intermodulation interference problems were predicted that have the potential to be system performance limiting to any operators analyzed in this report.

Page 241 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 19

8.0 Transmitter Harmonic Output Interference Analysis
Transmitter harmonic interference is due to non-linear characteristics in a transmitter. The harmonics are typically created due to frequency multipliers and the non-linear design of the final output stage of the transmitter. If the harmonic signal falls within the passband of a nearby receiver and the signal level is of sufficient amplitude, it can degrade the performance of the receiver.

The analysis takes into account the transmitter’s harmonic characteristics, output level, transmission line losses, filters, duplexers, combiners, isolators, multi-couplers and other RF devices that are present in each system. Additionally, the analysis considers the antenna separation space loss, horizontal and vertical gain components of the antennas as well as how they are mounted on the structure. The gain components are derived from antenna pattern data published by each manufacturer.

The analysis determines how much isolation is required to prevent receiver performance degradation for any harmonics that fall within a receiver’s passband. Receivers experiencing transmitter harmonic interference are depicted in the following Table.

Transmitter Harmonic Affected Receiver
Attn Needed
(dB)
ID
Frequency
(MHz)
Frequency
(MHz) Order ID
Frequency
(MHz)
None
Analysis Results: No transmitter generated harmonic interference problems were predicted that have the potential to be system performance limiting to any operators analyzed in this report. The calculations to determine harmful out of band harmonics assumed that proper bandpass filtering was utilized to severely reduce these harmonics to levels below those that could be system performance limiting to any receivers analyzed as part of this analysis.

Page 242 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 20

9.0 Transmitter Spurious Output Interference Analysis
Transmitter spurious output interference can be attributed to many different factors in a transmitter.

The generation of spurious frequencies could be due to non-linear characteristics in a transmitter or possibly the physical placement of components and unwanted coupling. If a spurious signal falls within the passband of a nearby receiver and the signal level is of sufficient amplitude, it can degrade the performance of the receiver.

The analysis takes into account a transmitter’s spurious output specification, output levels, transmission line losses, filters, duplexers, combiners, isolators, multi-couplers and other RF devices that are present in each system. Additionally, the analysis considers the antenna separation space loss, horizontal and vertical gain components of the antennas as well as how they are mounted on the structure. The gain components are derived from antenna pattern data published by each manufacturer.

Note: With the modern design of transmitters, Spurious interference results are rare. Any results in this Report Section could be from Transmitter Noise or Receiver Desense issues. Refer to report Section 5 or 6. Once any TNRD issues are resolved, it should clear up any Spurious Issues being reported.

The analysis determines how much isolation is required to prevent receiver performance degradation for any transmitter spurious signals that fall within a receiver’s passband. Receivers experiencing transmitter spurious output interference are depicted in the following Table.

Transmitter Affected Receiver
Attn
Needed
(dB)
ID
Frequency
(MHz) ID Frequency (MHz)
None
Analysis Results: No transmitter generated spurious emission interference problems were predicted that have the potential to be system performance limiting to any operators analyzed in this report. The calculations to determine harmful off channel emissions assumed that proper bandpass filtering was utilized to severely reduce these products to levels below those that could be system performance limiting to any receivers analyzed as part of this analysis.

Page 243 of 358 ends

AT&T CSL04615_Mammoth Lakes Fire (Mammoth Lakes CA)
Fox Hill Telecom, Inc Holden, MA | Charleston, SC Page 21

10.0 Summary & limitations
Based upon the data received regarding the proposed radio equipment to be utilized by AT&T and the existing radio systems provided by the Mammoth Lakes Fire Protection District, there should not be any negative impact to the performance of any radio systems proposed or existing detailed in this report from the proposed AT&T installation based upon calculations performed utilizing the radio configurations described in this report.

This analysis was performed solely based upon radio configuration data provided by AT&T and the Mammoth Lakes Fire Protection District. In certain instances, where assumptions were required, industry standard values were utilized for variables such as transmission power levels, filter response curves, combining schemes and other configuration variables if not provided by the parties listed above. The scope of this study was limited to radio systems present in this report exclusively. It does not take into account emissions from additional surrounding radio sources.

As identified in the various sections of this report, the potential is present for certain forms of interference to exist. However, based upon the supplied and assumed radio system configurations, the isolation provided by physical separation, Antenna pattern gain roll off, filtering variables and isolation devices appears adequate to allow these radio systems to co-exist as outlined in the drawings and configuration documents provided by AT&T and the Mammoth Lakes Fire Protection District.

This analysis was also performed assuming that all radio equipment including lines and antennas are performing to manufacturers specifications. Each system was analyzed assuming proper filtering was used to maintain compliance with all FCC licenses and reduce out of band emissions.

Page 244 of 358 ends

Attachment E
3ODQQLQJDQG(FRQRPLF'HYHORSPHQW
&RPPLWWHH5HVROXWLRQ

Page 245 of 358 ends

Recording Requested by and )
When Recorded Mail To: )
)
Town of Mammoth Lakes )
Community & Economic Development Department)
P.O. Box 1609 )
Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 )
_______________________________________
Recordation fee exempt per Government Code §27383
Space Above for Recorder’s Use
RESOLUTION NO. PEDC 2024-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE MAMMOTH LAKES PLANNING AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION APPROVING USE PERMIT 23-002 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 80-FOOT TALL MONOPINE CELL TOWER LOCATED AT 1574 OLD MAMMOTH ROAD
(APN: 040-040-021-000)
WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Use Permit was filed by the applicant, Eukon Group on behalf of AT&T, to allow an 80-foot tall “stealth monopine” cell tower in accordance with Chapter 17.32 (Special Purpose Zoning Districts), Chapter 17.68 (Use Permits), and Section

17.52.280 (Telecommunications Facilities) of the Town of Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code for property located within the Resort (R) zoning district at 1574 Old Mammoth Road; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Economic Development Commission conducted a noticed public hearing on the application request on November 8, 2023 and February 14, 2024, at which time all those desiring to be heard were heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Economic Development Commission considered, without limitation:

1. The staff report to the Planning and Economic Development Commission with exhibits;

2. The General Plan, Municipal Code, and associated Land Use Maps;

3. Oral evidence submitted at the hearing;

4. Written evidence submitted at the hearing; and

5. Project plans consisting of:
a. Project Plan Sheets T-1, LS-1, LS-2, and A-1 – A-6 dated January 12, 2024, and received by the Town on January 12, 2024;
b. Photo simulations received by the Town on January 31, 2024; c. Project Narrative dated September 22, 2023;
d. Propagation Package dated November 11, 2022; and
e. Interference Analysis Report dated September 19, 2023. f. Radio Frequency Safety Survey Report Prediction dated January 6, 2023 g. Site Justification Coverage Maps dated January 12, 2024 h. Technical Siting Analysis dated February 8, 2024

Page 246 of 358 ends

Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03

Page 2 of 11 ends

NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

I. CEQA.

The project has been determined to be categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 applies to projects that consist of (1) a limited number of new, small facilities or structures; and (2) the installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures, both of which the State has determined to be a class of projects that will not have a significant effect on the environment. For nonresidential uses, this exemption is generally limited to structures that do not exceed 2500 square feet in floor area. The project involves the construction of a new 80-foot tall “stealth monopine” cell tower located in the rear northeast corner of the Old Mammoth Road Fire Station site at 1574 Old Mammoth Road. The proposed tower and associated equipment enclosures are structures that do not involve significant amounts of hazardous substances and do not exceed a combined 2,500 square feet in floor area, as the project only includes approximately 640 square feet of floor area (cell tower and lease area combined).

Additionally, none of the exceptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2, which would preclude a project from using a categorical exemption, are applicable, as described below:
a. The project is not located in a sensitive environment. The project parcel is located on a fully developed and previously disturbed site that contains existing buildings and paving. Furthermore, the site is not located in an area that would be considered environmentally sensitive, as the site and surrounding parcels are fully developed.

There are no designated scenic highways adjacent to or near the project site. There are no designated farmland areas within the Town boundaries, thus the site is not identified as farmland by the California Resources Agency as part of the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, is not located on or near Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, and is not subject to any Williamson Act Contracts.

Furthermore, no portion of the site is zoned for or developed as forest land or timberland as defined in Public Resources Code §12220(g) and Government Code §4526. There are no known sensitive biological resources in the project vicinity, and the project site is not located within the boundaries of a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan. The project site is currently developed as a public safety use. No classified or designated mineral deposits of statewide or regional significance are known to occur on the project site. The site is not located within a very high fire hazard severity zone, is not located within a state-designated Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zone, does not have any known active faults crossing the site, and the nearest fault to the project site is approximately 1.5 miles to the northwest. There are no hazardous material sites listed within or near the project site per any of the State and Federal databases. There are no known historical or cultural resources on the site. b. The cumulative impact from successive projects of the same type in the same place over time will not be significant because at this time there are no applications or proposals submitted to the Town for additional cell towers to be constructed on the site, and the nearest existing tower is located approximately one mile away.

Page 247 of 358 ends

Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03

Page 3 of 11 ends

c. Given the location, scope, and purpose of the proposed project, there would be no significant impacts or effects on environmental resources during construction or operation, as the site has been previously developed. It is not anticipated that any unusual circumstances exist on the site that would result in significant impacts or increase the severity of any existing less than significant impacts. d. As stated above in response (a), the project site is not located adjacent to or near a scenic highway. The project location is not identified as a Major View Corridor in the Town’s General Plan and views of the project site are not considered scenic. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista or damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway.
e. As stated above in response (a), there are no hazardous materials listed within or near the project site. The project site is not listed on the Hazardous Waste and Substances list maintained by the Town; or the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker system which includes leaking underground fuel tank sites and spills, leaks, investigations, and cleanup sites; or the Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStar Data Management System which includes CORTESTE sites; or the Environmental Protection Agency’s database of regulated facilities. f. As stated above in response (a), there are no known historical or cultural resources areas on the site, and therefore, there will not be a substantial adverse change in the significance of an established historical resource as a result of the project.

Therefore, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(2) since the project meets the criteria for use of the ‘New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures’ categorical exemption and the application of that categorical exemption is not barred by one of the exceptions set forth in Section 15300.2.

II. MUNICIPAL CODE FINDINGS.

A. FINDINGS FOR USE PERMIT (Municipal Code Section 17.68.050 and 17.52.280)

1. The proposed use is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan and Title 17 and is consistent with any applicable specific plan or master plan; The proposed use is a telecommunications facility that requires a Use Permit pursuant to the Town Zoning Code (Title 17). The proposed project is located in the Resort (R) Zoning District and is part of the Snowcreek Master Plan Area. The R zone classification allows for various types of land uses such as: residential, professional and administrative office uses, hotels, recreational facilities, public or quasi-public uses, or combinations of such uses. The Master Plan includes an Infrastructure Plan addressing roads, public transportation, water, sewer, and other utilities within the Master Plan Area. Section 7.2.6 (Utilities) requires that all utility facilities and equipment be installed pursuant to the requirements of the relevant utility companies and be placed underground. However, the Master Plan also recognizes that some utility facilities and equipment are required to be above ground, and in such circumstances those above ground utility facilities must be screened with landscaping elements when necessary. The proposed telecommunications facility is a utility facility that is required to be aboveground to operate and is designed as a monopine for screening purposes, consistent with Section 7.2.6 of the Master Plan. The Master Plan does not contain other detailed development standards for telecommunications facilities, and instead relies on the standards specified in the municipal code.

Page 248 of 358 ends

Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03

Page 4 of 11 ends

The R Zoning District lists utilities as a permitted use within the zoning district (Section 17.32.110(B)(4)). The proposed project is consistent with the standards of the R zone. Section 17.52.280 (Telecommunications Facilities) of the Town’s Zoning Code requires a use permit for the proposed facility as a qualifying cellular wireless communications facilities in a nonresidential zone. The R zone and the Town’s Telecommunication Facility standards do not establish a maximum height for cellular facilities, and instead are determined through the use permit process. For this project, the maximum tower height was established through site analysis and testing completed by AT&T and the Fire District which determined that an antenna height of at least 70 feet was necessary to fill the cellular coverage gap in the area. Additionally, the R zone does not establish setbacks for cellular facilities and the imposed setback standards were instead based off the Public and Quasi-Public (P-QP) zone since that is the zone that most closely matches the use on the site. Per Section 2.1.1 of the Master Plan, “where the Master Plan is silent on development standards or other regulations, other provisions of the Town’s Municipal Code apply.”
The project is consistent with the General Plan, including, but not limited to, General Plan Economy Policy E.3.H which states, “Encourage expansion of a progressive telecommunication and internet communication infrastructure in the community” and General Plan Public Health and Safety Policy S.10.C which states, “Coordinate with California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), telecommunication, and internet service providers to improve resilience and redundancy of telecommunication and broadband infrastructure.”

2. The proposed use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health and safety nor materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and The site layout and project design ensure that the project will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the surrounding community nor injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity since the project adheres to the Town’s requirements for telecommunications facilities. The project is likely to substantially improve cell service in an area of Town that does not currently provide adequate levels of service, thus increasing safety in the area. Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Town is prohibited from denying a telecommunications facility application based on concerns about radio frequency emissions so long as the applicant has demonstrated that its proposed facilities will comply with FCC Standards for maximum permitted exposure (MPE) for radio frequency emissions. For this site, the applicant has provided a report certifying that that the proposed facility will be in compliance with all FCC Standards. Specifically the report found that the MPE for any area surrounding the site at an above ground level (AGL) height of 35 feet (maximum height of adjacent multi-family structures) would be 15.94% of the FCC’s allowable limit for General Population exposure. In addition, the report found that the MPE for the ground area immediately beneath the proposed monopine (0’ AGL) would be 4.01% of the FCC’s allowable limit for General Population exposure.

Page 249 of 358 ends

Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03

Page 5 of 11 ends

SECTION 2. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ACTIONS.

The Planning and Economic Development Commission hereby takes the following actions:

1. Finds that this project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. Approves Use Permit 23-002 subject to the following conditions:
(SEE EXHIBIT “A”); and

3. Directs staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RECUSED:

ATTEST:
______________________________ ________________________________ Nolan Bobroff, Michael Vanderhurst
Community and Economic Development Chair of the Mammoth Lakes Planning Director and Economic Development
Commission
NOTE: This action is subject to Chapter 17.104 of the Municipal Code, which specifies time limits for legal challenges.

Page 250 of 358 ends

Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03

Page 6 of 11 ends

APPLICANT:

I, Tayiika Logan Burks, an authorized representative for AT&T, the applicant, do hereby attest that I have read, and agree to, the conditions of approval stipulated within this Resolution. _______________________________ Date: ________________
Tayiika Logan Burks
(Notary Required)

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document, to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of Mono }
On , before me, , Notary
Public, personally appeared , who
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
_
Signature of Notary

Page 251 of 358 ends

Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03

Page 7 of 11 ends

PROPERTY OWNER:

I, Ales Tomaier, an authorize representative for the Mammoth Lakes Fire Protection District, the property owner, do hereby attest that I have read, and agree to, the conditions of approval stipulated within this Resolution.
_______________________________ Date: ________________
Ales Tomaier
(Notary Required)

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
_
Signature of Notary

Page 252 of 358 ends

Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03

Page 8 of 11 ends

EXHIBIT “A”
Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03
Case No. UPA 23-002

PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS

STANDARD PLANNING CONDITIONS

1. This approval authorizes the following: construction of an 80 foot tall “stealth monopine” cell tower on the 0.91-acre parcel identified as Assessor Parcel No. 040-040-021-000 as shown on Project Plan Sheets T-1, LS-1, LS-2, and A-1 – A-6 dated January 12, 2024.

2. The approved site and building plans including Sheets T-1, LS-1, LS-2, and A-1 – A-6 dated January 12, 2024; shall be adhered to and maintained for the duration of the permit.

3. This permit and all rights hereunder shall automatically terminate unless the site preparation or construction has been commenced within two years after the issuance of this permit and such work is diligently carried on until completion, or an extension of time has been granted in accordance with Municipal Code §17.60.060.B.

4. All new improvements constructed on the site shall be in compliance with all Town of Mammoth Lakes, County of Mono, Mammoth Community Water District, the Mammoth Lakes Fire Protection District, the CRWQCB Lahontan District, Great Basin Air Pollution Control District, OSHA, State of California and United States of America laws, statutes, ordinances, regulations, directives, orders, and the like applicable thereto and in force at the time thereof. Any violation of the above may constitute grounds for revocation under Chapter 17.128 of the Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code.

5. This resolution of approval, as conditioned herein, shall be recorded for the subject property by the Mono County Recorder’s Office to commence the approved use on the property or the issuance of any building permits for new or remodeled structures.

6. The site shall be maintained in a neat, clean and orderly manner. All improvements shall be maintained in a condition of good repair and appearance. Outdoor storage of equipment and other materials, except for firewood, is prohibited. Non-operating vehicles, equipment and materials inappropriate to the site and its use shall not be stored within outdoor areas on the site.

7. Storage of construction materials and equipment off-site shall not be permitted without a permit issued by the Community and Economic Development Department of the Town.

Any public or private property altered, damaged or destroyed by site preparation, grading, construction or use shall be restored to its pre-existing condition by the permittee.

8. All conditions of this permit shall be met or secured prior to final occupancy approval of any tenant improvements or new structures.

9. All uses are subject to review by the Building Official of the Town of Mammoth Lakes and must conform to occupancy ratings of the structures to obtain occupancy.

10. Town staff shall have the right to enter the subject property to verify compliance with these conditions. The holder of any permit associated with this project shall make the premises available to Town staff during regular business hours and shall, upon request make records and documents available to Town staff as necessary to evidence compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit.

Page 253 of 358 ends

Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03

Page 9 of 11 ends

11. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay all applicable fees as prescribed by ordinance and/or resolution and pay any fees due on this project processing account.

12. Where compliance with the conditions of approval or applicant initiated changes to the plans require additional staff review, that review time shall be billed at the Town’s established billing rates. Prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit, the applicant shall pay all outstanding costs for the processing of this application.

13. The approved site and building plans shall be adhered to and maintained for the duration of the permit.

14. This action may be appealed to the Town Council within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of Planning and Economic Development Commission approval in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 17.104.

15. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain a secondary source permit or letter of exemption from the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District.

16. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the Town and its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the Town, advisory agency, appeal board, or legislative body concerning this approval. The Town shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense.

17. All exterior lighting shall comply with Chapter 17.36.030 of the Town of Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code, Exterior Lighting. Exterior light fixtures having a total of over 400 lumens of output shall be equipped with shields that extend below the horizontal plane of the light source to direct the light downward onto the structure or surrounding grounds. Accent lighting is permitted as described in Municipal Code Section 17.36.030.F.6. This shall be verified prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

18. If the aggregate landscaped area exceeds 500 sq. ft., a landscape documentation package shall be required prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Said landscape documentation package shall conform with the requirements identified in Municipal Code Chapter 17.40 (Water Efficient Landscape Regulations). The aggregate landscape area is defined as the total horizontal surface area dedicated to plant installation and irrigation plus the wet surface of any decorative water features. The landscape area for shrubs and trees shall be determined using the shrub/tree mature growth diameter or drip line. The landscape area does not include footprints of buildings or structures, sidewalks, driveways, parking lots, decks, patios, gravel or stone walks, or other pervious or non-pervious hardscapes outside of planted areas. Landscape area does not include undisturbed areas with established non-irrigated vegetation, or landscaping that is exempt pursuant to Municipal Code Section

17.40.020.D.

If the project qualifies for an exemption from the landscape documentation requirements pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.40.020.D, the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Exemption form shall be completed by the property owner and the completed form shall be submitted to the Town prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

19. A valid building permit and a permit from the Mammoth Lakes Fire Protection District are required before any building can begin on-site.

20. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on all of the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the index.

Page 254 of 358 ends

Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03

Page 10 of 11 ends

21. The Building Division will require that a string line be run between the property monuments on the north (rear property line) and east (east side property line) at the time of foundation inspection to verify the actual field distance from the structure to the property line. The outside edge of the tower shall not be located closer than 20 feet to any property line.

22. All ground mounted equipment shall be covered with a clear anti-graffiti type material approved by the Director or shall be adequately secured to prevent graffiti.

23. Facilities shall be secured from access to the general public by fencing, or other deterring device or means as the Town may approve or require, so the facility is not an attractive nuisance.

24. The owner or operator of any facility shall submit and maintain current at all times basic contact and site information. The Department shall be notified by the owner or operator within 30 days of any change, including change of the name or legal status of the owner or operator.

25. All communications facilities and related equipment, including lighting, fences, shields, cabinets, and poles shall be maintained in good repair, free from trash, debris, litter, graffiti, and other forms of vandalism. Any damage from any cause shall be repaired as soon as reasonably possible.

26. The Mammoth Lakes Fire Protection District shall ensure that the approved facility is property maintained and guarantee that the facilities are dismantled and removed from the premises and the site reclaimed if it has been inoperative for a one-year period.

27. Each collocation of an additional service provider’s telecommunications facility upon the approved monopine is required to obtain a use permit from the Town of Mammoth Lakes.

28. The permittee shall be strictly liable for interference caused by its facilities with Town or other governmental emergency communications systems. The permittee shall be responsible for costs for determining the source of the interference, all costs associated with eliminating the interference (including but not limited to filtering, installing cavities, installing directional antennas, powering down systems, and engineering analysis), and all costs arising from third party claims against the Town attributable to the interference.

29. Testing of any equipment shall take place on weekdays only, and only between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., except that testing is prohibited on holidays that fall on a weekday. In addition, testing is prohibited on weekend days.

30. The facility must at all times comply with all applicable health requirements and standards pertaining to radio frequency emissions.

31. All antennas shall meet the minimum siting distances to habitable structures required for compliance with FCC regulations and standards governing the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions.

32. All antennas shall meet the minimum siting distances to public/uncontrolled areas required for compliance with the FCC regulations and standards governing the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions. Permittee shall keep up-to-date on current information from the FCC in regards to maximum permissible radio frequency exposure levels. In the event that the FCC changes its guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency, permittee shall, within 30 days after any such change, submit to the Planning and Economic Development Director a report prepared by a qualified engineer that demonstrates actual compliance with such changed guidelines. The Director may, at permittee’s sole cost, retain an independent consultant to evaluate the compliance report and any potential modifications to the permit necessary to conform to the FCC’s guidelines. Failure to submit the compliance report required under this condition, or failure to maintain compliance with the FCC’s guidelines

Page 255 of 358 ends

Resolution No. PEDC 2024-03

Page 11 of 11 ends

for human exposure to radio frequency at all times shall constitute grounds for permit revocation.

33. The proposed chain link fencing around the equipment shall have a maximum height of six feet and shall be painted or coated in a dark green, brown, or black color.

Page 256 of 358 ends

Attachment F
2/17/2024 PEDC Staff Report and All Attachments
Staff Report and All Attachments can be found at the following link:
https://www.townofmammothlakes.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/
View/13959/PEDC-Staff-Report-and-all-attachments

Page 257 of 358 ends

March 27th, 2024
Via Electronic Mail [[email protected]]
Jamie Gray, Town Clerk
Town of Mammoth Lakes
437 Old Mammoth Rd., Suite 230
Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546
RE: MLFPD Response to Appeal of Permit No. 211097 at Fire Station 2, 1574 Old Mammoth Road Dear Mayor Sauser and Town Council Members,
Mammoth Lakes Fire Protection District submits this letter to Town Council to support the Planning and Economic Development Commission’s approval to place a stealth mono-pine wireless telecommunications facility at Fire Station 2, 1574 Old Mammoth Road. The two appeal opinions the District would like to address are the design considerations of the tower and the need for a tower from a public safety perspective.

The appeal applicant incorrectly argues the tower will only benefit those who have AT&T wireless service. The tower, as permitted, was deliberately calculated, with District input, to meet the needs of multiple providers as designed. There is no intent on the part of the District to increase the height post-approval because it is already properly designed. While the District has had a good relationship with AT&T contractors throughout the process, it has utilized external consulting to ensure that the interests of the community are prioritized in any areas where the District and the provider may have varying interests. The District has had parallel conversations with Verizon representatives and has worked through the bulk of an agreement process to place a second provider on the tower to ensure that the vast majority of Town constituents and visitors receive coverage in the area under consideration. The District Board has no intention of increasing the height of the tower because it was properly designed to meet the community’s need. Because any significant changes to the tower would likely require new or altered District agreements for ground space utilization, the District has input on tower changes.

Statements in the appeal regarding the public safety uses of the system are incorrect and missing fundamental elements of modern communications systems. This system is being built out in response to the 2020 Mono County Grand Jury recommendations on emergency communications systems. At its core, communication is fundamental to any emergency response. The network coverage has implications for both communication between first responders as well as notification of the public. This was covered in extensive detail in the presentation to the Planning and Economic Development Commission and can be found in the recorded agenda. In summary, the tower will be utilizing FirstNet. The purpose of FirstNet is to establish, operate, and maintain an interoperable public safety broadband network. To fulfill these objectives, Congress allotted $7 billion and 20 MHz of radio spectrum to build the network. This provides the Fire District and incoming mutual aid resources with much of the communication capacity during incidents. The spectrum is dedicated to first responders and under the new state CRIS radio system can also interface with the VHF system for additional capacity. Perhaps more importantly, the tower provides much needed reach and capacity for the Federal program, IPAWS (Integrated Public Alert and Warning System). As the appeal actually states IPAWS “is FEMA’s national system for local alerting that provides authenticated emergency and life-saving information to the public through mobile phones” (appeal p. 9-10).

MAMMOTH LAKES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Post Office Box 5
3150 Main Street
Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546
Phone: 760-934-2300, Fax: 760-934-9210
www.mlfd.ca.gov

Page 258 of 358 ends

IPAWS is, by far, the most effective method for reaching the public in the event of an emergency. With the ubiquity of cell phone use, there is no better method for rapid and precise public outreach.

The area of Old Mammoth presents unique emergency considerations. There is limited access to the area due to road layout and topography. Due to the town being surrounded by federal forest, there is a limited mutual aid system in existence and local resources will be extremely taxed during any large-scale emergency or evacuation.

The amount of tourism in our community leads to a significant portion of our population being unfamiliar with the area and needing more direction than local residents may need in times of emergency. These are factors that policy makers have limited control over, but we can work towards better communications for first responders, as well as the public. In a significant number of after-action reviews of tragic incidents, communications are listed as a major contributing factor to the outcome.

This submittal is a high-level response to the appeal statements. Because of the technical nature of the program, the District would encourage viewing the Planning and Economic Development presentations and deliberations if further information if desired. The presentation also had testimony from an Operations Chief on an external Incident Management Team to provide expertise on the need for modern communications and how they impact the emergency response.

Thank you and please reach out if I can provide any further information or clarify need, at [email protected] or on my cell phone at (760) 914-2326.

Respectfully,
Ales Tomaier
Fire Chief
Mammoth Lakes Fire Protection District

Page 259 of 358 ends

Page 260 of 358 ends

Page 261 of 358 ends

Page 262 of 358 ends

Page 263 of 358 ends

Page 264 of 358 ends

Page 265 of 358 ends

Page 266 of 358 ends

Page 267 of 358 ends

Page 268 of 358 ends

Page 269 of 358 ends

Page 270 of 358 ends

Page 271 of 358 ends

Page 272 of 358 ends

Page 273 of 358 ends

Page 274 of 358 ends

Page 275 of 358 ends

Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Did you Know? Short-term Rental Moratorium.

Council Meeting Date: 4/3/2024
Prepared by: Pam Kobylarz, Assistant to the Town Manager Recommended Motion: This is an informational item only
Summary:

Each month the Town publishes a “Did you Know?” piece that highlights aspects of the Town’s programs and services that the public may not be familiar with. March’s piece focused on the Short-term Rental Moratorium and the outcome from that action. It was published in The Sheet, the Mammoth Times, and el Sol on the weekend of March 22, as well as being posted on the Town’s social media and website.

Page 276 of 358 ends

TownofMammothLakes.ca.gov Town of Mammoth Lakes
Did you know the Town
Council enacted a moratorium on
short-term rental certificates?
• On October 18, 2023, the Town Council adopted a moratorium on the issuance of new short-term rental (STR) certificates. This pause allowed for a study to be conducted on the impact of STRs on local housing and the community.
• From the moratorium came an overhaul of the current shortterm rental program including improved safety and quality of life for tourists and residents.

Improvements to the STR program include:
- Rental units will be required to be inspected every 4 years. - Local 24-hour emergency contacts will be required to be a certified business with the Town.
- An interactive map showing all Certified Properties will be available on the Town website where rental unit information will be available including the name and contact information for the operator as well as the phone number for the local 24-hour emergency contact.
- STR operators will be required to provide a Visitor Expectation Guide to all guests to establish guidelines to adhere to during their trip and how to integrate into the community responsibly. • Enforcement measures have been enhanced to allow an STR that is found to be in violation of local regulations to be suspended for 90 days and up to 1 year as well as administrative citations up to $5,000 per day.
• Violations subject to suspension or fine include failure to register an STR with the Town, failure to remit TOT/TBID, failure to obtain building permits during a remodel, improper disposal of trash, noise and maximum occupancy violations, advertising without a Certified Property authorization number, and renting in a zone where short-term rentals are not permitted.
• The moratorium will end on April 22, 2024 and the Town will resume the issuance of STR certificates under the new regulations.

If you have questions about short-term rentals, please contact the Finance Department at 760-965-3660.

DID YOU KNOW?

Page 277 of 358 ends

¿SABÍAS QUE?
• El 18 de octubre de 2023, el Ayuntamiento adoptó una moratoria en la emisión de nuevos certificados de alquiler de corta duración (STR). Esta pausa permitió que se realizara un estudio sobre el impacto de los STRs en la vivienda local y la comunidad.
• De la moratoria surgió una revisión del actual programa de alquiler a corto plazo que incluye una mayor seguridad y calidad de vida para turistas y residentes.

Las mejoras al programa STR incluyen:
- Las unidades de alquiler deberán ser inspeccionadas cada 4 años. - Se requerirá que los contactos de emergencia locales de 24 horas estén certificados como negocios con la Ciudad.
- Un mapa interactivo que mostrará todas las propiedades certificadas estará disponible en el sitio web de la Ciudad, donde estará disponible la información de la unidad de alquiler, incluido el nombre y la información de contacto del operador, así como el número de teléfono del contacto de emergencia local las 24 horas.
- Los operadores de STR deberán proporcionar una Guía de expectativas del visitante a todos los huéspedes para establecer pautas a seguir durante su viaje y cómo integrarse a la comunidad de manera responsable. • Se han mejorado las medidas de cumplimiento para permitir que un STR que se determine que viola las regulaciones locales sea suspendido por 90 días y hasta 1 año, así como citaciones administrativas de hasta $5,000 por día. • Las infracciones sujetas a suspensión o multa incluyen no registrar un STR ante la Ciudad, no remitir TOT/TBID, no obtener permisos de construcción durante una remodelación, eliminación inadecuada de basura, violaciones de ruido y ocupación máxima, publicidad sin un número de autorización de propiedad certificada, y alquilar en una zona donde no se permiten alquileres a corto plazo.
• La moratoria finalizará el 22 de abril de 2024 y el Pueblo reanudará la emisión de certificados STR según las nuevas regulaciones.

Si tiene preguntas sobre alquileres a corto plazo, comuníquese con el Departamento de Finanzas al 760-965-3660.
¿Sabías que el Ayuntamiento de
la ciudad promulgó una moratoria
sobre los certificados de alquiler
de corta duración?
TownofMammothLakes.ca.gov Town of Mammoth Lakes Page 278 of 358 Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: April 2024 PW Engineering CIP Update.

Council Meeting Date: 4/3/2024
Prepared by: Amy Callanan, PE - Engineering Manager
Recommended Motion: None
Summary: The April 2024 CIP update includes most of the Town’s active construction projects.

Page 279 of 358 ends

Capital Project Update
April 3, 2024 Update
(Created March 27, 2024)
*** Text shown in bold has changed from the previous update *** Project Notes Budget
CRC The CRC continues to be open and available to the public, and the contractor as demobilized. Many punchlist items which were not completed by the contractor may be included in the “Phase 2” Interior TI Work (see below). ~$15M
CRC - Mobility Hub All site work is complete except for installation of parking lot lighting to be installed by TOML staff in the spring.
$1.75M
CRC “Phase 2” - Interior TI
Work
Building permit plans have been approved, work is scheduled to be bid for construction this summer. Scope items include bleachers, stairs and ADA lift, rubber flooring, office space, east patio railing, and front entry “canopy”. $1.05M
The Parcel Phase 1 “The
Sawyer”
Electrical system complications affecting the commissioning of elevator and fire alarm systems are delaying opening of both buildings into at least May.

However, good progress continues to be made on both the buildings and on site. Upcoming work scheduled for this spring includes the Center St sidewalk, additional MUPs, streetlights, bus shelters, landscaping and the public playground and park.
$58M
(buildings)
~$5.6M
(public
infrastructure)
The Parcel Phase 2
“Kingfisher”
The contractor expects to break ground on “Kingfisher 1” (four 3-story “tuckunder” buildings along Inyo St and Tavern Rd) this summer. Staff are reviewing building and grading permit applications. Funding for “Kingfisher 2” (one 4- story “podium” building in NE corner of site) is pending. This combined Phase 2 includes 148 housing units, but does not include any additional “public” infrastructure.
$46M (Kingfisher 1)
TBD (Kingfisher 2)
Chaparral Extension (The
Parcel)
The project is currently in winter suspension. Work will resume on underground dry utilities (electrical and telecom), sidewalks and multi-use paths in the spring. $1.8M
60 Joaquin The project is currently in winter suspension. The contractor expects to finish work on the foundations once snow melts in May, and set the modular building units in site in late-May/early-June.
$2.42M
Laurel Mountain Rd Rehab &
Sidewalk
All work is now complete. A close-out report will be included on the 5/1 Town Council agenda.
$3.5M
Fuel Island The fuel island is currently in service, however, the previously completed work does not meet Town specifications and will be removed and replaced in the spring (by June 15) at the contractor’s cost.
$466K
Main Street Landscaping
Phase 1
Staff is close to successfully negotiating with a contractor for completion of the project this summer. Town Council is being requested to authorize execution of a contract with Grays Grasshopper Inc. at this April 3 meeting. $508K
OMR Beautification Phase 1 Staff continues to discuss the project with potential contractors and we hope to have additional info soon.
$500K

Page 280 of 358 ends

Town Civic Center The project is scheduled for Design Review approval at the April 10 PEDC meeting. Meanwhile, the design team is working on construction drawings and specifications adequate for permit submittal and bidding. The Town continues to await results of a $10 million grant application for construction of the EOC/Community Resiliency Center component of the project. Staff anticipates awarding a construction contract in July. Construction on site – including grading, utilities, and building foundations - could begin as early as July 2024. ~$20M + (TBD)
Childcare Center (Core &
Shell only)
Town Council is being requested to award a contract with JPB Designs at this April 3 meeting. Construction on site could begin this month, with re-location of the portable units occurring in late July after the end of the school year. This project currently consists of providing a core and shell building only. The details of childcare facility operation are in progress.
$1.65M
Dog Park The project is currently in winter suspension. Construction of concrete curb, asphalt, and fencing will occur along with installation of the restroom and artificial turf in the spring.
$1.1M
SHARP Trailhead
Infrastructure
The contract has been executed. Work on site is expected to start after Motocross and the July 4 holiday.
$1M
2024 Road & MUP Rehab Staff has finalized plans (see attachments included at the end of this report) for the rehabilitation of several road and MUP segments throughout Town.

Proposed treatment methods include full removal and replacement of existing failing asphalt as well as slurry seals to preserve the life of pavement on many arterial and collector roads. Staff intends to split this project into 2 separate contracts, planning to go out to bid this week or next, with work beginning in June or July. Due to the large scope of work, the project may extend into 2026.

Final selection of road segments to actually be treated may depend on bid prices received.
$4M
Mammoth Creek Park West
(CRC)
Scope of work includes installation of a picnic/performance pavilion, bouldering structure, playground wood chips, asphalt path, irrigation and grass, artificial turf, and fence repair. Work under this “project” is planned to be completed using a variety of “CMAS” contracts, or be included in other related bids (e.g.

Road Rehab and CRC “Phase 2”). Our goal is to complete all work prior to the Town’s 40th Anniversary celebration on Labor Day.
$500K
Mammoth Arts & Cultural
Center (MACC)
The design team is preparing a revised SD cost estimate (expected early April) based on the reconfigured site design, then will resume work on DD-level plans. A final DD cost estimate will be provided at the end of May. Upon approval, the design team will then begin preparing construction documents, with the goal of bidding in late August – mid-September. Staff hopes to begin construction this fall.
~$15M + (TBD)
Town Facility Painting Staff is developing plans for exterior and interior painting of almost all Town building facilities, with the intent of going out to bid in March and awarding a contract by May 15. Work is expected to occur this summer. ~$250K
Town Fencing Repairs The project is out to bid, staff hopes to be able to award a contract by May 15.

Work is expected to occur this summer.
~$35K

Page 281 of 358 ends

Page 282 of 358 ends

Page 283 of 358 ends

Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: April 2024 Office of Outdoor Recreation Update.

Council Meeting Date: 4/3/2024
Prepared by: Lawson Reif, Outdoor Recreation Manager
Recommended Motion: This is an information item only; no action is required.

Summary: Attached is the April 2024 Office of Outdoor Recreation (OOR) Projects update. The document highlights many (but not all) of the ongoing projects within the OOR. The OOR will be providing once a month written updates in this manner to keep the Council and public informed of the work undertaken by the Office of Outdoor Recreation.

Page 284 of 358 ends

Office of Outdoor Recreation Update
April 2024 Update
Created March 26
th, 2024

PROJECT NOTES BUDGET/OTHER INFO
SHARP Trails Construction bid awarded to
SPIESS Construction CO.

Construction will begin in
Summer 2024 (ideally mid-July).

SNC Grant Budget: $953,414.00
SHARP
Trailhead
Have received competitive bids
for trailhead construction.

Selection and project logistics
will be determined soon.

Construction will begin in
Summer 2024 (ideally mid-July).

Logs will need to be removed to
ensure contractor has the room
needed to perform the work.

SNC Grant Budget: $510,596.68
Forest Service
Snow Storage
Location
Forest leadership relayed that the
snow pit site is contaminated,
and that further study and
potential remediation is needed
prior to the USFS considering
allowing future snow storage at
this site.

OOR and other TOML
departments are working
collaboratively on alternative
snow storage sites.

Costs for monitoring plan & clean-up currently
unknown.

Stewardship 2024 stewardship days
established: June 1st, July 27th, &
September 21st, 2024.

Leave No Trace Spotlight: In
partnership with MLR, Mammoth
Lakes was chosen from a
nationwide process to host a 3-
day on-the-ground event to build
momentum around local
stewardship efforts.
https://lnt.org/our-work/protectingparks/spotlights/
https://lnt.org/event/leave-no-trace-spotlightmammoth-lakes/ Summer
Recreation
Map
Development and dissemination
of new summer recreation map
in collaboration with our
Will be ready for Summer 2024. Total Cost TBD.

Page 285 of 358 ends

contractor. Working with USFS
partners to ensure that
information is consistent across
various products.

Grants Waiting on $15,000.00 CalFire
grant to fund 3 new interpretive
signs along the recently logged
Mammoth Creek Parcel.

We did not receive the RTP grant
to re-pave MUPs segments,
despite being a finalist. We are
currently exploring other grants
to meet this need.

CalFire Request: $28,000.00
Interpretation In partnership with the Whitebark
Institute, developing 3 new
interpretive signs to be placed on
the MUPs immediately adjacent
to the recently thinned Mammoth
Creek Parcel. Signs will focus on
Forest Health, Identification, and
Bark Beetles.

In collaboration with MLR,
developing 5 new interpretive
signs for the Sherwins Trailhead.

MLR & OOR staff recently
attended the Intra-Tribe Summit
in Bishop to seek input on
content related to Native
American history.

In collaboration with MLT & MLR
the OOR is working with Clean
Up The Lake to develop 2 new
interpretive signs for the Lake
George Area. Signs will focus on
the CUTL project and aquatic
invasives.

Seeking CalFire Grant to Fund Mammoth Creek
parcel signs and utilization of SNC
Implementation Grant for Sherwins Trailhead.

Off Highway
Vehicle Grants

USFS & BLM
Public
Comment
The USFS and BLM are seeking
public comment on their OHV
grants for the upcoming field
season. The OOR will be
engaging council and other
bodies as the May 6th deadline
approaches.
https://www.fs.usda.gov/alerts/inyo/alertsnotices/?aid=86087

Page 286 of 358 ends

Winter
Grooming
OOR has been able to groom the
Shady Rest and Sherwin Winter
Trails consistently for the entire
winter. Snow coverage is getting
close to our lower limit and we
will likely wrap up our winter
operations within the next week
or two depending on new snow
accumulation. We have
identified a good solution to our
equipment needs for next
season.

Expanded grooming proposal will
be analyzed as part of the OSV
subpart C process and will be
listed as an alternative in the
upcoming EIS.

The Inyo has expressed interest
in the potential for partners to
become more engaged in their
winter grooming program. The
OOR is working with the Inyo to
determine the scale and scope
and will eventually coordinate
with the state OHV/OSV program
when appropriate.

Live updates on grooming status can be found at
www.mammothtrails.org
Hiring OOR is currently seeking
qualified Trail Crew & Trail Hosts.

Help us spread the word!
Recently offered trail crew
positions and facilitated 10 host
rehires for summer 2024.

Trail Host position to be flown soon. Trail Crew
Announcement can be found here:
https://www.townofmammothlakes.ca.gov/767/EmploymentOpportunities Sign
Replacement
Replacement of 58 broken
Mammoth Lakes Trail System
Signs, many of which were
destroyed in the winter of
2022/2023. All signs graphics
have been finalized and orders
placed. Awaiting delivery of
metal signs for MUPS, soft
surface signs have been
received.

Page 287 of 358 ends

Town Council of Mammoth Lakes
Minutes of Regular Meeting
March 20, 2024, 4:00 p.m.
437 Old Mammoth Road, Suite Z, Mammoth Lakes
Members Present: Mayor Bill Sauser, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Amanda Rice, Councilmember John Wentworth
Members Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Chris Bubser
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 4:02 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 437 Old Mammoth Road, Suite Z, Mammoth Lakes.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Town Attorney Andrew Morris led the flag salute.

3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments given at this time.

4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no additions to the agenda.

5. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONS AND/OR DEPARTMENTS (AS NEEDED) Fred Wong, District Ranger for the Mammoth District, gave an update regarding snow grooming and the Reds Meadow Road Project. There was discussion among members of Council and Mr. Wong.

Page 288 of 358 ends

Town Council Minutes
March 20, 2024

Page 2 of 5 ends

Parks and Recreation Director Stuart Brown gave an update regarding current parks and recreation activities. There was discussion among members of Council and staff.

Community and Economic Development Director Nolan Bobroff gave an update regarding current planning activities. There was discussion among members of Council and staff.

5.1 Receive the monthly Parcel Affordable Housing Project Construction Update.

Community and Economic Development Director Nolan Bobroff outlined the information in the staff report. Shellan Rodriguez, SMR Development representing the Pacific Companies, gave an update regarding the current status of the project. Brad Glenn, Construction Superintendent for Pacific West Builders, gave a construction update. There was discussion among members of Council, Mr. Glenn, Ms. Rodriguez, Jennie Reed from Buckingham Property Management, and staff.

5.2 Mammoth Main Base Redevelopment Project Update (Mammoth Mountain Main Lodge Area).

Jen Murillo, Lisa Wise Consulting, gave an update regarding the Mammoth Main Base Redevelopment Project.

6. STAFF PRESENTATIONS

6.1 Presentation of the 2023 Building Department statistics presented by Building Official Tom Perry.

Building Inspector Tom Perry presented the 2023 Building Department statistics. There was discussion among members of Council and staff.

7. CONSENT AGENDA
Moved by Councilmember John Wentworth
Seconded by Councilmember Amanda Rice
Approve the Consent Agenda.

For (4): Mayor Bill Sauser, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Amanda Rice, and Councilmember John Wentworth
Absent (1): Mayor Pro Tem Chris Bubser

Page 289 of 358 ends

Town Council Minutes
March 20, 2024

Page 3 of 5 ends

Carried (4 to 0)

7.1 Approve the minutes of the regular meeting of March 6, 2024.

7.2 Cancel April 17, 2024 Town Council Meeting.

7.3 Approve the resolution authorizing the purchase of the real property located at 1629 Majestic Pines Drive, Unit 91 in the Bigwood Condominium complex for the Town’s Housing NOW! BRIDGE
Program.

7.4 Approve the resolution authorizing the sale of the real property located at 1629 Majestic Pines Drive, Unit 101 in the Bigwood Condominium complex under the Town’s Housing NOW! BRIDGE Program.

7.5 Approve the resolution authorizing the sale of the real property located at 449 Sierra Manor Road, Unit 12 in the Forest Meadows Condominium complex under the Town’s Housing NOW! BRIDGE Program.

7.6 Waive the reading and adopt by title only the ordinance amending Chapter 3.12 Transient Occupancy Tax and 5.40 Transient Rental of Residential Units of the Town of Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code.

7.7 Waive the reading and adopt by title only the ordinance to terminate the moratorium on the issuance of Short-Term Rental Certificates.

7.8 Accept Payment Approval Report 3/7/24 in the amount of $1,552,886.71. Accept Payment Approval Report 3/14/24 in the amount of $109,139.44.

8. PUBLIC HEARINGS

8.1 2024/25 Parks and Recreation Department Fee Schedule Amendments.

The Mayor opened the public hearing at 5:29 p.m.

Parks and Recreation Director Stuart Brown outlined the information in the staff report.

With no members of the public coming forward to speak, the Mayor closed the public hearing at 5:41 p.m.

Page 290 of 358 ends

Town Council Minutes
March 20, 2024

Page 4 of 5 ends

Moved by Councilmember John Wentworth
Seconded by Councilmember Amanda Rice
Approve by resolution the 2024/25 Parks and Recreation Department fee schedule amendments as presented in Exhibit B, as amended to change the Mammoth Rec Zone and Whitmore Pool Inyo Mono K-12 student rate to $45.

For (4): Mayor Bill Sauser, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Amanda Rice, and Councilmember John Wentworth
Absent (1): Mayor Pro Tem Chris Bubser
Carried (4 to 0)

9. POLICY MATTERS

9.1 Presentation on budget performance through the second quarter of Fiscal Year 23-24 and approval of Budget Amendments.

Town Manager Rob Patterson outlined the information in the staff report.

There was discussion among members of Council and staff.

Moved by Councilmember Amanda Rice
Seconded by Councilmember John Wentworth
Adopt the resolution amending the Fiscal Year 23-24 budget as recommended in Attachment A – Budget Adjustments.

For (4): Mayor Bill Sauser, Councilmember Sarah Rea, Councilmember Amanda Rice, and Councilmember John Wentworth
Absent (1): Mayor Pro Tem Chris Bubser
Carried (4 to 0)

10. COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS
There were no reports given at this time.

Page 291 of 358 ends

Town Council Minutes
March 20, 2024

Page 5 of 5 ends

11. ADJOURNMENT
The Council adjourned the meeting at 6:13 p.m.

Jamie Gray, Town Clerk

Page 292 of 358 ends

1 TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Title: Award contract for the Community Childcare Center Project to JPB Designs Inc.

Meeting Date: April 3, 2024
Prepared by: Matthew Freedman, PE, Associate Engineer
Amy Callanan, PE, Engineering Manager
Shaun Troy, Financial Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Recommends Town Council:
 Approve the Plans and Specifications.
 Award a contract for the Base Bid, Alternate 1 and Alternate 2 to the lowest responsive bidder, JPB Designs Inc. in the amount of $1,660,000.00.  Authorize the Town Manager to execute the construction contract.  Authorize the Public Works Director to accept the project upon completion.  Authorize the Public Works Director to review and approve minor revisions to complete the project, up to an additional 10% of the award amount.

BACKGROUND:

In 2022, the Mammoth Unified School District (MUSD) notified the Town that they will be getting rid of their modular structures during their renovation construction project. The Town desired to utilize some of the modular units as core and shell for a community childcare center, to be located on the Mammoth Lakes Foundation (MLF) property at 100 College Parkway and released an RFQ/RFP for design. A consulting contract was awarded to AP Architects on September 6, 2022 for the design of a Community Childcare Center utilizing modular structures. The project utilizes six (6) of the modular buildings to provide approximately 6,700 SF of core and shell space available for future operation of a Childcare Center. MUSD originally informed the Town that the modular units would have to be moved by July 2023, but due to delays in MUSD’s construction project, the deadline was changed to the summer of 2024.

On January 26, 2024, the Town advertised the bid for the Community Childcare Center core and shell project. In order to find the most economical solution the project was advertised with a base bid and three (3) alternates:
 Base Bid: The base bid included the relocation of six (6) modular buildings from existing site to new site, new foundation (and associated site/utility work),

Page 293 of 358 ends

2 placement of the modulars on the new foundation and construction at buildings to provide watertight building envelope.
 Alternate 1: Alternate 1 included removing and replacing exterior siding and trim around the modulars.
 Alternate 2: Alternate 2 included removing and replacing the roofing system for the structure.
 Alternate 3: Alternate 3 included prepping and painting to refurbish the existing building exterior.

ANALYSIS:

Staff solicited bids for the construction of the project beginning January 26, 2024. Bids were publicly opened on February 23, 2024, at 3:00 PM. Two (2) bids were received with pricing as follows:

JPB Designs Inc. Base Bid: $1,272,000.00
Alternate 1: +$98,000.00
Alternate 2: +$290,000.00
Alternate 3: +$30,000.00
Spiess Construction Co, Inc. Base Bid: $1,644,390.00
Alternate 1: +$97,200.00
Alternate 2: +$174,000.00
Alternate 3: +$49,000.00
A bid review was completed, and no irregularities were identified.

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

The project is fully funded and under budget with $1,800,000 allocated. This funding covers the Base Bid, Alternate 1, and Alternate 2, in the amount of $1,660,000. The remaining $140,000 is budgeted for project contingencies. This project will be accounted for in the Capital Improvement Department (531) of FD 300 – Capital Projects.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:

The Childcare project was included in the Addendum to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Mammoth Arts and Cultural Center (MACC) dated November 29, 2023, which was approved as part of this project’s Minor Design Review DR24-002.

The CEDDD including the Notice of Determination is anticipated to be filed the first week of April.

PROJECT PLANS:

Page 294 of 358 ends

Page 295 of 358 ends

Page 296 of 358 ends

Page 297 of 358 ends

Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Adopt resolutions calling and giving notice of a general municipal election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024 for the election of two members of the Town Council and requesting the Mono County Board of Supervisors consolidate the election.

Council Meeting Date: 4/3/2024
Prepared by: Jamie Gray, Town Clerk
Recommended Motion: Adopt resolutions calling and giving notice of a general municipal election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024 for the election of two members of the Town Council and requesting the Mono County Board of Supervisors consolidate the election.

Summary: The California Elections Code requires that every two years, general law cities hold a general municipal election for the purpose of electing members to the city council. The next scheduled election is November 5, 2024. Further pursuant to State law, the legislative body must call and give notice of each general election. Also, Elections Code 10403 states that if a city desires to consolidate an election with the County, a request must be made of the Board of Supervisors.th Lakes to elect three members of the Town Council.

Attached are proposed resolutions that, respectively call and give notice of the general municipal election to be held on November 5, 2024, and request that the Mono County Board of Supervisors consolidate the municipal election with the statewide election.

Page 298 of 358 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 24-

RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL

OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2024 FOR THE ELECTION OF

CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 5, 2024 for the election of Municipal Officers.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH

LAKES, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the Town of Mammoth Lakes, California, on Tuesday, November 5, 2024 a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing two Members of the Town Council for the full term of four years.

SECTION 2. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law.

SECTION 3. That the Town Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to coordinate with the County of Mono Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter, and all supplies, equipment, and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.

SECTION 4. That the polls shall be open at seven o’clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o’clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, pursuant to

Page 299 of 358 ends

Resolution No. 24-

Page 2 ends

Elections Code 10242 except as provided in Section 14212 of the Elections Code of the State of California.

SECTION 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.

SECTION 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the Town Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form, and manner as required by law.

SECTION 7. That in the event of a tie vote (if any two or more persons receive an equal and the highest number of votes for an office) as certified by the Mono County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk, the Town Council, in accordance with Election Code Section 15651(a), shall set a date and time and place and summon the candidates who have received the tie votes to appear and will determine the tie by lot or, in accordance with Election Code Section 15651(b), shall conduct a special runoff election to resolve the tie vote and such special runoff election is to be held on a Tuesday not less than 40 days nor more than 125 days after the administrative or judicial certification of the election which resulted in a tie vote.

SECTION 8. That the Town Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

SECTION 9. The Town Council authorizes the Town Clerk to administer said election and all reasonable and actual election expenses shall be paid by the Town upon presentation of a properly submitted bill.

Page 300 of 358 ends

Resolution No. 24-

Page 3 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of April, 2024. ______________________________
BILL SAUSER, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
JAMIE GRAY, Town Clerk

Page 301 of 358 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 24-

A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL

OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF

MONO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 2024, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE

HELD ON THE DATE PURSUANT TO
SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Mammoth Lakes called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 5, 2024 for the purpose of the election of two Members of the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the Town the precincts, polling places, and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the County Election Department of the County of Mono canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH

LAKES, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Mono is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, for the purpose of the election of two Members of the Town Council.

Page 302 of 358 ends

Resolution No. 24-

Page 2 ends

SECTION 2. That the County Election Department is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. The election will be held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the statewide election.

SECTION 3. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the County Election Department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.

SECTION 4. That the Town of Mammoth Lakes recognizes additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs.

SECTION 5. That the Town Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the County Election Department of the County of Mono.

SECTION 6. That the Town Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of April, 2024. ______________________________
BILL SAUSER, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
JAMIE GRAY, Town Clerk

Page 303 of 358 ends

Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Approve by resolution the waiving of bidding requirements and awarding of a contract for purchase of one new loader to Cashman Cat an Empire South LLC company in the amount of $494,800.

Council Meeting Date: 4/3/2024
Prepared by: Haislip Hayes, PE Public Works Director
Recommended Motion: Approve by resolution the waiving of bidding requirements and awarding of a contract for purchase of one new loader to Cashman Cat an Empire South LLC company in the amount of $494,800.

Summary: The Town of Mammoth Lakes maintains a fleet of snow removal equipment to provide snow removal services to the community. Funding is allocated on an annual basis to a vehicle replacement fund. This funding ensures that equipment can be replaced once it reaches the end of its useful life. Staff proposes to surplus a 2001 loader (L13) and its 1992 bucket (LB13) from the fleet. This unit is currently being used by the airport. The airport will receive a 2007 (L19) loader to replace it once the new loader is delivered. Generally, loaders are replaced every 20 years, and the airport loader is beyond the Town’s projected life cycle. Thus, moving L19 to the airport will be an update to their fleet and help to ensure stability in their equipment. Staff were made aware that a Cat 966G was currently available in Reno. The Town usually waits months to years for the delivery of equipment. Purchasing the loader now will serve the Town for what remains of this winter and ensure the loader is replaced before the next. The replacement of L19 is fully funded.

As of 7/1/23 $507,942 was allocated towards its replacement.

Page 304 of 358 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 24-__

RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL

OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

RESPECTING WAIVER OF COMPLIANCE WITH BIDDING PROCEDURE

FOR THE PURCHASE OF A LOADER PURSUANT
TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.20.210

AND AWARD OF BID PURSUANT
TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.20.191
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Mammoth Lakes has determined that Caterpillar Loaders are a unique and novel product to be used in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Mammoth Lakes has determined that Caterpillar Loaders are available only from a sole vendor.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the bidding requirements be waived, and the Public Works Director be authorized to purchase one (1) Caterpillar Loader according to the Town of Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code Section 3.20.210, and that the contract is awarded to Cashman Cat an Empire South LLC Company in accordance with Municipal Code Section 3.20.191.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this April 3rd, 2024.
_____________________________
BILL SAUSER, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
JAMIE GRAY, Town Clerk

Page 305 of 358 ends

Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Re-appoint incumbents Jesse Baldwin, Elliott Brainard, Wes Davis, and Dan Polis to the Building Advisory Committee/Board of Appeals, with terms expiring on April 1, 2028.

Council Meeting Date: 4/4/2024
Prepared by: Jamie Gray, Town Clerk
Recommended Motion: Re-appoint incumbents Jesse Baldwin, Elliott Brainard, Wes Davis, and Dan Polis to the Building Advisory Committee/Board of Appeals, with terms expiring on April 1, 2028.

Summary: Four terms of office will become vacant on the Building Advisory Committee/Board of Appeals on April 1, 2024 due to the expiring terms of Jesse Baldwin, Elliott Brainard, Wes Davis, and Dan Polis. The terms of appointment are for four years and expire on April 1, 2028.

Notice of the vacancies was advertised and posted and the members were notified. Four applications were received. The applicants are the four incumbents. The applications are attached.

The Town Municipal Code states that all appointments to commissions and committees shall be made by the Town Council. It does not state the manner in which this is to be accomplished.

Page 306 of 358 ends

Page 307 of 358 ends

Page 308 of 358 ends

Page 309 of 358 ends

Page 310 of 358 ends

Page 311 of 358 ends

Page 312 of 358 ends

Page 313 of 358 ends

Page 314 of 358 ends

Page 315 of 358 ends

Page 316 of 358 ends

Page 317 of 358 ends

Page 318 of 358 ends

Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Approve Resolution for FY23-24 Measure U Programming funding in the amount of $208,750.

Council Meeting Date: 4/3/2024
Prepared by: Kim Anaclerio, Mammoth Lakes Recreation
Recommended Motion: Approve the Resolution authorizing Measure U funding for community programming in the amount of $208,750.

Summary: Each year Mammoth Lakes Recreation (MLR) works through a process to recommend Measure U funding for several organizations that provide community programming under the “Arts and Culture” provision of Measure U. MLR holds public meetings to review applications and holds a public hearing prior to recommending funding to the Town Council for final approval.

MLR held public review meetings on February 21 and 22, 2024 and a public hearing on March 12, 2024.

All three meetings and agenda materials are available through the Town’s website:

MLR Allocations Committee - 2/21:
https://pub-townofmammothlakes.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=3a7f5e72-1e3e-4bebb9cd-2dd032092f7d&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English MLR Allocations Committee - 2/22:
https://pub-townofmammothlakes.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=7043c9d5-ecbe-4c15- 8fed-42243919c344&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English
MLR Board 3/12/24:
https://pub-townofmammothlakes.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=cbd7972c-abd1-438faed2-2a6819aac204&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English The attached resolution provides for the recommended funding of $208,750, supporting programs for 12 organizations. The current FY23-24 budget has $225,000 allocated for the purpose of funding Measure U community programming. Remaining funds from this allocation will become part of the FY23/24 Measure U uncommitted fund balance.

Page 319 of 358 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 24-

RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL

OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING THE MAMMOTH LAKES RECREATION (MLR) ALLOCATION

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS TO SUPPORT LOCAL
PROGRAMMING FOR FISCAL YEAR 23-24 FROM MEASURE U (FUND 217) WHEREAS, the Town Council approved in March 2010 the Utility Users Tax extension at the rate of 2.5% and the tax is a special tax restricted for the funding, planning, construction, operation, maintenance, programming, and administration of facilities and projects for Mobility, Recreation, and Arts & Culture, and is commonly referred to as “Measure U”; and
WHEREAS, Mammoth Lakes Recreation (MLR) has reviewed, evaluated, and are recommending the Town Council fund allocated expenditures for programming local arts and culture related events; and
WHEREAS, adequate funds are available for these purposes which are in accordance with the use of Measure U funding as set forth in Chapter 3.44 of the Mammoth Lakes Municipal Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council authorizes the Town Manager to execute appropriate funding agreements between the approved programming entities and the Town of Mammoth Lakes in the amount of $208,750 to fund specific programing as provided in Attachment A.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3
rd day of April 2024.

BILL SAUSER, Mayor
ATTEST:

JAMIE GRAY, Town Clerk

Page 320 of 358 ends

Resolution No. 24-

Page 2 ends

Attachment A
Mammoth Lakes Recreation Board Recommendations
FY 23/24 Measure U Programming Funding Allocations
Organization Amount
1 Chamber Music Unbound 32,000
2 Clean Up the Lake 12,000
3 Eastern Sierra Arts Alliance 40,000
4 Eastern Sierra Avalanche Center 11,500
5 Eastern Sierra Community Chorus 8,500
6 Eastern Sierra Symphony 15,500
7 Friends of the Inyo 11,000
8 Mammoth Channel 7,000
9 Mammoth Mountain Ski Patrol Alumni 6,750
10 Mono Arts Council 44,000
11 Sierra Classic Theater 10,500
12 Valentine Eastern Sierra Reserve 10,000
Total Recommended: $208,750

Page 321 of 358 ends

1 TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Title: Resolution to approve the FY2024-25 project list to be submitted to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds under Streets and Highways Code Section 2034.

Meeting Date: April 3, 2024
Prepared by: Haislip Hayes, PE Public Works Director
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a resolution approving the 2024-25 project list to be submitted to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds under Streets and Highways Code Section 2034.

BACKGROUND:

On April 28, 2017 the Governor signed into law SB1. SB1 invests $5.4 billion annually over the next decade to fix California’s transportation system. In November of 2017 the State Controller began depositing funding into the newly created Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). A percentage of this new RMRA funding will be apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties. The funding provides a balance of new revenues and reasonable reforms to ensure efficiency, accountability, and performance from each dollar invested in the transportation system.

To be eligible for funding the Town is required to sustain a Maintenance of Effort (MOE) and may not supplant current efforts. Annually, prior to receiving funds, a proposed project list which contains the description and location, schedule for completion, and estimated useful life of the improvement must be adopted by resolution. Upon completion of the FY, a project expenditure report must be submitted to the State. RMRA funding may be used for road maintenance and rehabilitation, safety projects, traffic control devices, complete streets components, and to match State and Federal grants.

Staff has previously provided a general update on CIP projects to Council and sought general direction as to how available funding should be allocated. Previous SB1 resolutions have resulted in the completion of two curb and gutter rehabilitation projects along Meridian Blvd. In 2020 Staff utilized SB1 funding to support the construction of the Lake Mary Sidewalk project located adjacent to the brewery. Recently, SB1 funds have been used to support the rehabilitation of Laurel Mountain Rd and construction of the Chaparral extension.

Page 322 of 358 ends

2 ANALYSIS:

In 2022 Mono County committed to the Town the use of $2.4 Million in County SB1 funds in exchange for future STIP funds. The SB1 funds have been collected by the County and are available now. This arrangement provided Mono County an equivalent amount of funding in STIP funds. Mono County had a need for available STIP funding to support a project in future years. This agreement was mutually beneficial and allowed both agencies to advance their projects. This level of collaboration with Mono County is appreciated and is indicative of the strong working relationship the agencies have. The Town continues to spend down this balance in the Chaparral project. The Town’s projected RMRA revenue for FY 23-24 is approximately $186,133.00.

In 2023 Staff identified priority projects that address many of the Town’s current needs.

These projects are ongoing, and it is recommended that 24-25 SB1 funds be used to support construction of these existing projects:

1. Chaparral Road Extension
a. Location: Mammoth Lakes, CA. The project will connect the northerly end of Chaparral to the new segment of Tavern Road being constructed in the parcel.
b. Scope: The road extension will include sidewalks, storm drains, asphalt, and multi-use paths.
c. Useful life: This project is expected to have a useful life of 20-30 years. d. Schedule: The project was awarded in the Fall of 2022; construction began in June of 2023 and will be complete before July of 2024.

2. 2024 Road Rehabilitation Project
a. Location: various roads throughout the Town.
b. Scope includes:
 Reconstructing up to 3.5 miles of road
 Applying fog seal to 1.8 million square feet of roads. c. Useful life: This project is expected to have a useful life of 20-30 years. d. Schedule: The project will be awarded in May of 2024 and construction will start in early June of 2024 and will be complete before November of 2024.

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

Approval of the project list above permits the State Controller’s office to disperse funding to the Town monthly. Staff will use these funds to fully fund SB1 approved projects. Staff will return to Council with any scope changes that would require additional resources or funding.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:

Generally, road maintenance projects are categorically exempt from CEQA. Each project will be evaluated independently to determine if there is an impact to the environment. This analysis will be provided to Council as required and as appropriate.

Page 323 of 358 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 24-

RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, TO INCORPORATE INTO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET A LIST OF PROJECTS FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the Town of Mammoth Lakes are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the Town of Mammoth Lakes must include a list of all projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, in the Town of Mammoth Lakes budget, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and WHEREAS, the Town of Mammoth Lakes, will receive an estimated $186,133 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2024-25 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Mammoth Lakes has undergone a public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list; and WHEREAS, the Town of Mammoth Lakes used a Pavement Management System to prioritize asphalt projects on the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the Town of Mammoth Lakes maintain and rehabilitate streets and add active transportation infrastructure throughout the Town of Mammoth Lakes this year and similar projects into the future; and
WHEREAS, the 2021 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the Town of Mammoth Lakes’ streets and roads are in “at-risk” condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a “good” condition; and
WHEREAS, without revenue from SB 1, the Town of Mammoth Lakes, would not have had the funding to complete the proposed maintenance projects throughout the community; and WHEREAS, if the Legislature and Governor failed to act, city streets and county roads would have continued to deteriorate, having many and varied negative impacts on our community; and WHEREAS, maintaining and preserving the local street and road system in good condition will reduce drive times and traffic congestion, improve bicycle safety, and make the pedestrian experience safer and more appealing, which leads to reduced vehicle emissions helping the State achieve its air quality and greenhouse gas emissions reductions goals; and
WHEREAS, restoring roads before they fail also reduces construction time which results in less air pollution from heavy equipment and less water pollution from site run-off; and

Page 324 of 358 ends

Resolution Bo. 24-

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials, and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the Town Council of the Town of Mammoth Lakes, State of California, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. A $186,133 budget for fiscal year 2024-25 will incorporate the following projects described in the planned to be supported with RMRA revenues:

1. Chaparral Road Extension
a. Location: Mammoth Lakes, CA. The project will connect the northerly end of Chaparral to the new segment of Tavern Road being constructed in the Parcel. b. Scope: The road extension will include sidewalks, storm drains, asphalt, and multi-use paths.
c. Useful life: This project is expected to have a useful life of 20-30 years. d. Schedule: The project was awarded in the Fall of 2022; construction began in June of 2023 and will be complete before July of 2024.

2. 2024 Road Rehabilitation Project
a. Location: various roads throughout the Town.
b. Scope includes:
i. Reconstructing up to 3.5 miles of road
ii. Applying fog seal to 1.8 million square feet of roads. c. Useful life: This project is expected to have a useful life of 20-30 years. d. Schedule: The project will be awarded in May of 2024 and construction will start in early June of 2024 and will be complete before November of 2024.

3. The Public Works road rehabilitation maintenance budget for fiscal year 2024-25 will include an additional $186,133 earmarked to be used only for the projects listed above.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Mammoth Lakes, State of California this 3rd day of April 2024.
___________________________
BILL SAUSER, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
JAMIE GRAY, Town Clerk

Page 325 of 358 ends

Mammoth Lakes Town Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Support for SCR-102 “Dave McCoy Memorial Highway.” Council Meeting Date: 4/3/2024
Prepared by: Rob Patterson, Town Manager
Recommended Motion: Authorize the Mayor to sign a letter in support of Senate Concurrent Resolution #102 naming portions of U.S. Highway 395 the “Dave McCoy Memorial Highway.” Summary: An effort is underway to have a section of U.S. Highway 395 - in southern Mono County - named the "Dave McCoy Memorial Highway" after the iconic founder of Mammoth Mountain Ski Area who passed away in 2020. The portion of Highway 395 is from the junction of Route 203/395 (PM R25.750) to Convict Lake Road (PM 21.313).

This measure would designate a specified portion of United States Highway 395 in the County of Mono as the Dave McCoy Memorial Highway. The measure would also request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering the cost, to erect those signs.

Page 326 of 358 ends

______________________________________________________________________________ March 28, 2024
The Honorable Senator Dave Cortese
Chair, Senate Transportation Committee
State Capitol, Room 405
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SCR 102 (Alvarado-Gil) Dave McCoy Memorial Highway
As introduced on January 18, 2024 – SUPPORT
Set for Hearing – April 9, 2024 – Senate Transportation Committee Dear Senator Cortese:

The Town of Mammoth Lakes is proud to support SCR 102 (Alvarado-Gil) Dave McCoy Memorial Highway, which will designate a specified portion of United States Highway 395 in the County of Mono as the Dave McCoy Memorial Highway. The measure would also request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering the cost, to erect those signs.

Mr. McCoy recognized the need to establish Mammoth Lakes as a sustainable community and generously contributed his time, financial resources, and creative energy to provide ball fields, a town transportation network, a high school and a hospital, as well as to support road bike and mountain bike races, and Mammoth Motocross. The Mammoth Lakes Foundation, Mammoth Cerro Coso Community College, Gateway Student Apartments, and Mammoth Lakes Repertory Theatre all exist because of Mr. McCoy’s foresight, dedication, and generosity. Mr. McCoy’s philanthropic efforts included building and then donating to Inyo County the large hangar at Bishop Airport, which today houses critical life flight operations. The late Dave McCoy is deserving of special commemoration, and it would be most fitting that the highway traveled by those called to his mountain bears his name.

For these reasons, the Town of Mammoth Lakes is proud to support SCR 102. If you need additional information, please contact Rob Patterson, Town Manager at [email protected] or 760.965.3601.

Sincerely,
Bill Sauser
Mayor – Town of Mammoth Lakes
Town of Mammoth Lakes
P.O. Box 1609, Mammoth Lakes, CA, 93546
(760) 965-3600
www.townofmammothlakes.ca.gov

Page 327 of 358 ends

3/25/24, 4:37 PM Bill Text - SCR-102 Dave McCoy Memorial Highway. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SCR102 1/2 SHARE THIS:

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 102
SCR-102 Dave McCoy Memorial Highway. (2023-2024)
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2023–2024 REGULAR SESSION
Introduced by Senator Alvarado-Gil
January 18, 2024
Relative to the Dave McCoy Memorial Highway.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SCR 102, as introduced, Alvarado-Gil. Dave McCoy Memorial Highway.

Fiscal Committee: yes
WHEREAS, Dave McCoy was a visitor to the eastern Sierra Nevada at 13 years of age, and, in remembrance, is now known as a household name, visionary, and a force of nature who found the mountains were calling him; and
WHEREAS, Dave McCoy, in his later adolescence, observed some Norwegian ski jumpers who sparked his interest in skiing, and later was employed as a hydrographer for the Los Angeles Department of Water in 1936, and would ski up to 50 miles per day, becoming the California state champion in skiing at 22 years of age; and WHEREAS, Dave McCoy at one point considered McGee Mountain, near United States Highway 395, as a place to set up a primitive rope tow, but he eventually concluded that the snow at the lava dome complex known as Mammoth Mountain was much better, so he set his rope tow and roots in the ground in 1942 at Mammoth Mountain; and
WHEREAS, Dave McCoy and a small group of skiers worked diligently to dig holes, mix concrete, and install a chairlift on their own by Thanksgiving of 1955; and
WHEREAS, Dave McCoy, an American skier, businessman, and pivotal icon, who founded the Mammoth Mountain Ski Area in 1942 and contributed to economic prosperity throughout the eastern Sierra region, retired after Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites

Page 328 of 358 ends

3/25/24, 4:37 PM Bill Text - SCR-102 Dave McCoy Memorial Highway. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SCR102 2/2 running the ski area for 68 years; and
WHEREAS, Dave McCoy exemplifies a person who should be honored due to his extraordinary public service and exemplary contribution to the public good and connection of Californians through recreation; and WHEREAS, Dave McCoy will forever be remembered for generations to come in the eastern Sierra region and by all visitors who love to recreate in Mammoth Lakes and California’s Great Beyond; and WHEREAS, Dave McCoy demonstrated courage, service and gratitude and lived the “American Dream”; and WHEREAS, Dave McCoy should be honored with a segment of highway to represent his vision, virtuous work ethic, and public service to all Americans who “dream to believe that anyone, regardless of where they were born or what class they were born into, can attain their own version of success in a society in which upward mobility is possible for everyone”; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, the Assembly thereof concurring, That the Legislature honors Dave McCoy by designating the portion of United States Highway 395 south of Route 203 to Convict Lake in the County of Mono as the Dave McCoy Memorial Highway; and be it further Resolved, That the Department of Transportation is requested to determine the cost of appropriate signs consistent with the signing requirements for the state highway system showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources sufficient to cover the cost, to erect those signs; and be it further
Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this resolution to the Director of Transportation and to the author for appropriate distribution.

Page 329 of 358 ends

1 TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Title: Authorize execution of contract with Gray’s Grasshopper, Inc. for Main St. Landscaping project Phase 1.

Meeting Date: April 3, 2024
Prepared by: Riley Griesenbeck, Engineering Technician
Amy Callanan, PE, Engineering Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Town Council:
 Approve the Plans and Specifications.
 Award the contract to Gray’s Grasshopper, Inc. in the amount of $528,263.10.
 Authorize the Town Manager to execute the construction contract.  Authorize the Public Works Director to accept the project upon completion.  Authorize the Public Works Director to review and approve minor revisions to complete the project, up to an additional 10% of the award amount.

BACKGROUND:

In 2019, the Town constructed sidewalks along both sides of Main Street. New irrigation lines were installed in the new sidewalk locations and the sidewalk alignment created pockets of bare soil planned for landscaping. In 2020, the Town contracted with a landscaping consultant Litchfield Design to work with public works and the trails department to create a landscaping installation and maintenance plan.

The Main Street Landscaping project includes installation of irrigation facilities, light earthwork, and in-ground planting of native drought-tolerant trees and plants on both sides of Main Street between Mountain Boulevard to just east of the Main Street-Old Mammoth Road intersection. New irrigation lines will use sleeves installed underneath sidewalk and Frontage Road asphalt during the Main Street Sidewalk projects. The project plans were completed in 2022 and were split into two phases based on available funding.

ANALYSIS:

On May 27, 2022, Town of Mammoth Lakes staff bid the Main Street Landscaping Phase 1 project. Bids were opened on June 23rd, 2022, and no bids were received. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 20166, if no bids are received, the Town may have the project done by a contractor of its choice. After consulting with the Town Attorney, staff began reaching out to contractors to find someone interested in completing the Project. After

Page 330 of 358 ends

2 months of searching, negotiating, and working with potential contractors, Town staff received two bids in February of 2024.
 Bid 1: Gray’s Grasshopper, Inc. $517,905.00
 Bid 2: Alpine Landscape $1,091,000
A bid review was completed, and no irregularities were identified.

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

On March 20, 2024, Town Council authorized $465,000 (FD 100 – General Fund) to be allocated to the Main Street Landscaping capital project (Phase I and II) in the FY 2023- 24 second quarter budget adjustment. This project is now fully funded with $715,000 allocated. This funding covers the construction contract, in the amount of $528,263.10, and an additional 10% for project contingencies, in the amount of $52,826.31, for Phase I. The total budget for the Phase I construction contract and project contingencies is $581,089.41.

The remaining funds allocated, in the amount of $133,910.59, and any additional funds not expended on Phase I will be utilized to complete Phase II. This project will be accounted for in the Capital Improvement Department (531) of FD 300 – Capital Projects.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:

The project is categorically exempt from CEQA under California Code of Regulations Section 15304.b. Minor Alterations to Land.

In addition, Town Staff will continue to work closely with the Community and Economic Development Department Planning Division and MCWD to ensure that all plantings and irrigation systems comply with the Town’s Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance (WELO) and all current and projected water use restrictions.

Page 331 of 358 ends

Page 332 of 358 ends

Page 333 of 358 ends

Page 334 of 358 ends

Page 335 of 358 ends

Page 336 of 358 ends

Page 337 of 358 ends

Page 338 of 358 ends

Page 339 of 358 ends

Page 340 of 358 ends

TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Title: FY2024-25 Budget – General Fund Revenue Projections Meeting Date: April 3, 2024
Prepared by: Rob Patterson, Town Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff is requesting Town Council comment and direction on proposed revenue projections that will assist staff in preparing the preliminary FY24-25 budget to be presented on May 1st for Town Council consideration.

BACKGROUND:

The methodology and background used for each revenue forecast is consistent with prior years.

Preparing these initial revenue estimates provides a base line for providing current service levels with specific areas identified for additional investment. The development of a robust capital improvement program (CIP) along with current and future planned investment in housing programs requires a very measured process in setting revenue estimates for the Town’s operating budget. We remain conservative in our estimates to prevent over reliance on high revenues for operations, while allowing for greater flexibility in executing on the CIP and other priority investments. These revenue estimates are completed with the best available information to date. Staff will receive updates on information for revenue projections and make adjustments throughout the budget cycle. Staff are working on the expense side of the budget as we prepare a preliminary budget for discussion tentatively set for May 1st.

FY24-25 General Fund Revenue Projections
In preparing for the FY24-25 budget, several key revenue projections are made to set the stage for the expenditure side of the budget. The primary focus is on the General Fund, which supports the majority of the Town’s operations. The following highlights our projection of revenues for the preliminary budget work. These projections are subject to change as more information is obtained through the budget process. The following discussion uses the adopted FY23-24 budget as a point of comparison as well as trends over the past several years. The preliminary base operating revenue for FY24-25 is $32,824,365 which represents a 7.4% increase from the prior year adopted budget ($30,571,165). This increase is consistent with the natural growth of the organization as we have enhanced our core services to meet the needs of our community.

Transient Occupancy Tax
The base Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is recommended at $18.5 million this year, which is $500,000 or 2.8% higher than last year and represents 56.4% of the General Fund budgeted revenue for FY24-25.

We believe this base TOT is sustainable based on summer / winter diversification and TBID supported marketing efforts. The staff does believe this revenue item will exceed the budget within the next year, allowing for investments in Housing Now! initiatives and the implementation of the CIP to support advancements to the community infrastructure. However, locking in a higher budget would increase our vulnerability to fluctuating visitation and revenues. This approach also allows us to allocate revenue in excess of the operating budget to special projects and one time spending that will further critical

Page 341 of 358 ends

Fiscal Year 24-25 Budget Revenue Projections Page 2
community programs. The Town is unique in that we depend so heavily on visitation and this revenue stream, but we are also unique in the fact we have a system to provide financial capital to further our projects, over and above our operating needs.

Visitation to the Town remains strong and ahead of most resort communities around the State who have not recovered from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The big winter of FY22/23 has generated excitement and renewed interest in our main attraction, winter sports. While the winter of FY23/24 was an average to slightly down year, when the snow did arrive, we had some big weekends and the strongest February on record. Staff anticipates this interest in our amenities will continue provided the economy continues to support leisure travel. We do anticipate continued growth in foreign travel that was significantly reduced during the pandemic which should help the region with additional visitors.

For comparison purposes, TOT enforcement related revenues from assessments, penalties or interest are not included in the base TOT revenue analysis. The analysis provides a comparison of Non-Winter months (May – November) and Winter-Months (December – April). The two seasons are used to demonstrate both steady increase in Non-Winter month revenue and more potential volatility in the Winter months. The average for the past 10, 6, & 3 years is provided.

Staff is requesting Council discussion and confirmation on the TOT revenue recommended for the initial preparation of the operating budget.

Page 342 of 358 ends

Fiscal Year 24-25 Budget Revenue Projections Page 3
Property Tax
All Combined Property Tax revenue streams represent approximately 15.1% of the General Fund revenue or $4,950,000. This projected revenue is 5.2% higher than the prior year’s adopted budget. In previous years we have been much more aggressive on property tax as the housing market and sales were very strong. There are 10 components to property tax and some elements like Documentary Transfer Tax are not expected to be as strong as previous years. That coupled with a flat or slightly declining property value may prompt some adjustments to valuation or other factors that will impact overall performance of this revenue item. Higher interest rates are impacting sales prices, along with concerns about the overall economy. This initial analysis considers the revenue collected in the last two years as a good baseline. This is a conservative estimate as we are $400,000 to $500,000 less than the previous year’s tax collected. These estimates will be reviewed in the coming weeks as we anticipate receiving more detailed projections from Mono County. Below you will find a historical representation of property tax.

Sales Tax
Sales Tax represents 9.9% of the General Fund or $3,250,000 for FY24-25. This amount is 8.3% higher than the prior year’s adopted budget (3,000,000). The Town has seen strong results in sales tax over the last full year, FY22-23, exceeding the budget by more than $1,000,000. This result is tied to the volume

Page 343 of 358 ends

Fiscal Year 24-25 Budget Revenue Projections Page 4
of visitors and price of goods sold. Staff expect this trend to stabilize as inflation slows. In April 2019, AB147 was signed into law requiring every retailer engaged in business in the State to collect the tax from the purchaser, file a return, and remit the tax to the State. This bill also identified “Marketplace facilitator” as one who contracts with marketplace sellers to facilitate the sale of products (a.k.a. Online Sales). This required online sales platforms to collect and remit taxes. The visitation coupled with collection of online sales tax should result in a strong year for this revenue stream. Below you will find a historical representation of sales tax.

Franchise Fees
Franchise Fees revenue estimate of $900,000 represents 2.7% of the General Fund revenue budget for FY24-25. The Town receives franchise fees for Solid Waste, Electricity, Gas, and Cable. The budgeted revenue is equal to recommendation, so no adjustment is recommended for this year. In the prior year, the Town completed a new Solid Waste franchise agreement with Waste Connections, Inc. (DBA Mammoth Disposal) including a 2% increase in the franchise fee. The Town has realized the increase in the current year and staff expects this to perform to budget expectations. These line items are heavily dependent on visitation as they represent utilization of services. Based on this fact, staff expects the current year to over perform expectations, however predicting future growth is where staff usually remains conservative, therefore, staff is recommending a continuation of current revenue expectations for this component. Below you will find a historical representation of combined franchise fees.

Page 344 of 358 ends

Fiscal Year 24-25 Budget Revenue Projections Page 5
Certified Properties Fee
This is a new revenue stream for FY24-25, and it is a result of work done with the STR Advisory Committee to review the administration of Short-Term Rental (STR) business in the Town. The fee is $250 per unit and is renewed annually. The total number of active STR units is approximately 3,600, which should produce $900,000 in annual revenue. The roll out of this program will begin after April 22, 2024, and the half year remaining for calendar year 2024 will be prorated at 50%, or $125 per unit.

This initial prorated amount ($450,000) combined with the renewal in January should produce a total of $1,350,000 in new revenue for FY24-25. This represents 4.1% of the General Fund revenue budget for FY24-25.

Other Revenues
Other Revenues represent 11.3% of the General Fund revenue and include a variety of fees and charges for service, interest, grants, etc. Some of the larger elements include the annual COPs grant ($100,000); cannabis tax ($120,000); business license ($380,000); building permit fees ($850,000); planning and zoning applications ($350,000); TBID Administrative fee ($129,000); facility rentals ($200,000); recreation program fees ($160,000); transit fee ($150,000); and transfer – in ($440,000). Transfer In represents monies allocated from other funds to cover expenditures in the General Fund. The major elements included here are Tourism Reserve support for host program and fish stocking as well as

Page 345 of 358 ends

Fiscal Year 24-25 Budget Revenue Projections Page 6
Measure R and U support for the Office of Outdoor Recreation. In addition to the specific items listed above, other revenues include planning fees; other development related fees; charges for programs; licenses and permits; interest, and miscellaneous administrative fees. The projected revenue is approximately $3,694,365.

Page 346 of 358 ends

Fiscal Year 24
-25 Budget Revenue Projections Page 7

Page 347 of 358 ends

Fiscal Year 24
-25 Budget Revenue Projections Page 8

Page 348 of 358 ends

Fiscal Year 24-25 Budget Revenue Projections Page 9
Other Funds
The Town has other funds that will be incorporated into the preliminary budget such as Gas Tax, Airport, Vehicle maintenance and replacement, Measures R & U, and a number of smaller funds, such as the various assessment districts. Finalizing both revenues and expenses for several of these funds is tied to the General Fund. Using the direction provided on the above revenues will assist staff in proceeding with the next step in the budget cycle.

CONCLUSION
Your Town leadership team and finance staff have put in a number of hours in preparing for the budget cycle. They are committed to working within the Town’s financial limits and the policy direction provided by Town Council as we provide services to our community. Council discussion and recommendation on the key revenue components of the FY24-25 budget are a critical first step in the development of our budget. As the budget cycle progresses, staff will provide additional budget details, comparisons and other relevant information that serves to inform the overall budget development.

Page 349 of 358 ends

FY24-25 Budget
General Fund Revenue Projections
Rob Patterson
Town Manager
April 3, 2024

Page 350 of 358 ends

General Fund Revenue – Transient Occupancy Tax

Page 351 of 358 ends

General Fund Revenue – Property Tax

Page 352 of 358 ends

General Fund Revenue – Sales Tax

Page 353 of 358 ends

General Fund Revenue – Franchise Fee

Page 354 of 358 ends

General Fund - Projected Revenue

Page 355 of 358 ends

General Fund - Projected Revenue

Page 356 of 358 ends

Agenda Item ________
File No. ____________

AGENDA BILL
Subject: Councilmember Reports
Initiated by: Jamie Gray
______________________________________________________________________ BACKGROUND:

Each member of the Town Council is appointed to serve as a Town representative to a number of committees, commissions, and organizations.

These groups meet infrequently and from time to time the representatives will report to the rest of the Council at a regularly scheduled meeting.

In addition, Councilmembers on occasion participate in meetings, conferences and seminars, and their reports on these educational opportunities are of benefit to the rest of the Council.

ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION:

California Government Code requirements pertaining to the open meeting act stipulate that all items for discussion must be listed on the agenda before the matter can be discussed and/or acted upon. To meet this requirement, and the intent of the Brown Act, Councilmember Reports are listed on each agenda to allow representatives to report to the rest of the Council at these meetings.

The following is a list of the commission/committees on which members of the Council serve:

Land Use:

Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) – Rea, Rice, and Bubser as alternate
Airport Land Use Commission – Rea, Rice, and Bubser as the alternate Mono County Collaborative Planning Team (CPT) – Senior Planner Kim Cooke and Rice as alternate
Intergovernmental Relations:

Town and County Liaison Committee – Sauser, Bubser, and Town Manager and Rea as alternate
Desert Mountain Division of the League of California Cities – Sauser and Town Manager as alternate
Eastern Sierra Council of Governments (ESCOG) – Bubser, Wentworth, and Sauser as alternate
Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District – Wentworth and Bubser as alternate

Page 357 of 358 ends

League of California Cities City Voting Delegate – Sauser and the Town Manager as the alternate
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Board – Rea and Assistant to the Town Manager as alternate
Transportation:

Local Transportation Commission (LTC) – Bubser, Sauser, and Paul Chang; Town Manager as alternate
Eastern Sierra Transit Authority (ESTA) Board – Bubser and Sauser Local Issues:

Mammoth Lakes Tourism (MLT) Board – Wentworth
Mammoth Lakes Recreation (MLR) Board – Rea
Eastern Sierra Community Housing Board – Rice
Treasury Oversight Committee – Finance Director; Town Manager as alternate STR (Short Term Rental Advisory Committee) – Rice and Bubser LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:

According to the California Open Meeting Act, commonly referred to as the Brown Act, the agenda must reflect every matter to be discussed by a governing body.

RECOMMENDATION(S):

This agenda bill is submitted for information only.

Page 358 of 358 ends

Mammoth Lakes City CouncilApril 3, 2024

Mammoth Lakes City Council
April 3, 2024