Cities Index.
Parking Analysis (Dated May 8, 2024) - 451 Manhattan Beach Blvd

Manhattan Beach City Council
January 21, 2025

Document
Parking Analysis (Dated May 8, 2024) - 451 Manhattan Beach Blvd
Meeting
January 21, 2025
Body
Manhattan Beach City Council
Pages
8
Original file
6.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

MEMORANDUM
To: Erik Zandvliet, P.E.

City of Manhattan Beach
Date: May 8, 2024
From: Alfred C. Ying, P.E., PTP
Francesca S. Bravo
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
LLG Ref: 1-24-4604-1
Subject:

Metlox 2023 Master Use Amendment – Parking Assessment

This memorandum has been prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) to summarize the shared parking analysis prepared for the existing Metlox Shopping Center (the “Center”) in the City of Manhattan Beach, California (the “City”). We understand that the purpose of this analysis is to document the current peak weekday and weekend parking demands at the Metlox Parking Structure in order to determine if there will be a sufficient number of on- site parking spaces to adequately accommodate the proposed project land use allocations at the Center.

More specifically, this memorandum provides an assessment of the following:
• A description of the existing and proposed site conditions, including a review of the existing on-site parking supply;
• A review of the observed weekday and weekend parking demand at the existing on-site parking structure (i.e., through the conduct of site -specific/empirical surveys);
• Off-street parking requirements applicable to the site pursuant to the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program (LCP);
• Projections of future parking demand at the project site accounting for weekday and weekend peak project site operations using published parking demand ratios; • A forecast of site -wide peak parking demand utilizing shared parking analysis methodologies (i.e., which account for the changes in parking demand that occur based on time of day variations for the various site uses), and • A conclusion regarding adequacy of the proposed parking supply to accommodate the forecast future weekday and weekend peak parking demands.

Definition of Terms

The following parking-related definitions and explanations are provided in order to clarify the terms employed in this analysis.

Inventory refers to a field review of a parking facility or parking system to determine the number of spaces (i.e., supply of spaces), typically by designation type (i.e., standard, compact, carpool, etc.), for each individual facility and on a campus -wide or site -wide development basis. The field review includes an inventory of the number of marked stalls (i.e., striped parking spaces) and excludes informal parking spaces and unmarked parking areas used for valet park operations, if applicable. In this s tudy, measurements were not TK
08/16/2024
Erik Zandvliet, P.E.

May 8, 2024

Page 2 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4604\Memo\4604-m3.docx
taken to determine if the striped parking spaces meet local jurisdiction and federal government dimension requirements.

Occupancy refers to the number of parked vehicles observed in spaces compared to the number of available spaces for a parking facility or parking system. This information is obtained by verifying and validating entry and exit transaction data for each parking facility access point or by conducting parking accumulation counts of vehicles parked in each facility in the study area over a period of time. This information then is compared with the parking supply to determine parking adequacy.

Parking Accumulation refers to the number of parked vehicles in a study area (i.e., surface lot, parking structure, etc.) at any specified time.

Parking Adequacy refers to the difference between the parking supply and either the existing or estimated future parking demand. The calculation of a positive result indicates a parking surplus and a negative result indicates a parking deficit.

Parking Demand refers to the number of parking spaces needed to meet motorists’ needs on a given day.

Parking Supply refers to the number of parking spaces in a parking facility or parking system obtained in the inventory.

Survey Day refers to the day that the parking accumulation surveys of the parking facility or parking system were conducted, or for which parking facility entry and exit transaction data was evaluated.

Site Location and History

The existing Metlox Shopping Center site is located at 451 Manhattan Beach Boulevard.

The Center is situated at the northwest corner of the North Valley Drive -North Ardmore Avenue/Manhattan Beach Boulevard intersection. The project site location and general vicinity are shown in Figure 1.

In 2002, a Master Use Permit (MUP) (Resolution No. 5770) and Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (A5-MNB-02-257) were approved for a maximum allowable building floor area of 63,850 square feet for the site. The MUP Coastal Development Permit outlined the maximum square footages for each land use category as well as a maximum allowable Buildable Floor Area (BFA) for the development.

In 2018, a MUP Amendment (Resolution No. 18 -0074) was approved for the site, which maintained the same overall maximum allowable square footages per use category and parking requirement . A breakdown of the currently permitted use categories and the corresponding maximum allowable BFA is provided below:

Erik Zandvliet, P.E.

May 8, 2024

Page 3 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4604\Memo\4604-m3.docx
• Retail Sales and Services 20,000 SF
• Eating/Drinking Establishment 8,000 SF (6,400 SF seating area) • Visitor Accommodations - Hotel 35-40 guest rooms (26,000 SF) • Offices and Personal Services 17,500 SF

Per the 2002 CDP, the parking requirement for the site is 330 spaces, which accounted for 160 spaces for the site development, 15 spaces as replacement for the 1148 Morningside Drive surface parking lot , and 155 spaces as replacement for the Lot M public surface parking lot. Based on the planned parking supply of 439 spaces, the parking surplus for the parking garage is 109 spaces. The parking surplus of 109 spaces remains unchanged with the 2018 MUP Amendment.

Existing Setting

The existing Metlox Shopping Center consists of 63,712 square feet (SF) of commercial space and contains a mix of retailers, eateries, and offices as well as a 38-room hotel (Shade Hotel). Of the existing Center, approximately 62,575 SF of commercial space is currently occupied including 22,500 SF for the Shade Hotel, while the remaining 1,137 SF of retail space (Unit D124) is leased. The existing tenant list for the Center is provided in Table 1.

Existing Subterranean Parking Garage

Parking for t he Metlox Shopping Center is provided within the existing 2- level public subterranean parking garage. Access to the parking garage is provided via one driveway on Valley Drive and one driveway on Morningside Drive. An inventory of the number of parking spaces was conducted for each level of the parking garage. The existing parking structure is comprised of 22 general parking areas within Level 1 and Level 2 parking levels. A total of 461 vehicular parking spaces is currently provided within the parking structure. A summary of the parking structure parking inventory by level is provided in Table 2.

A total of 200 parking spaces are provided on Parking Level 1. Of the 200 spaces, 154 spaces are designated as 3-hour metered spaces along with 4 electric vehicle (EV) spaces (2-hour limit), 10 handicap accessible spaces, 31 valet spaces (5 blocked), and one reserved space for City vehicles. On Parking Level 2, a total of 261 spaces designated as 10-hour metered/permit parking spaces are provided, including 235 standard spaces and 26 compact spaces. The metered parking is valid daily between 8:00 am and 9:00 pm , and free after 9:00 pm. The Parking Structure Level 1 and Level 2 plans are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.

Erik Zandvliet, P.E.

May 8, 2024

Page 4 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4604\Memo\4604-m3.docx
Project Description

The proposed 2023 Master Use Permit Amendment requests an increase in the maximum allowable square footages for the “Retail Sales and Services” (including “personal Improvement Service”) and “Eating and Drinking Establishment” use categories for the Center. Based on the most intense land uses as the priority, the resulting breakdown of the proposed land use categories and corresponding maximum allowable BFA is provided below:

• Retail Sales and Services 15,044 SF
• Personal Improvement Services 7,576 SF
• Eating/Drinking Establishment 17,212 SF ( 13,770 SF seating area) • Visitor Accommodations - Hotel 38 guest rooms (22,500 SF) • Offices and Personal Services 1,518 SF

It is noted that the Offices and Personal Services category is estimated as 1,518 SF as resulting remaining floor area after all other categories have been deducted from the maximum BFA (63,850 sq. ft.) allowed for the property.

Vehicle Parking Calculation Per City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program

The City of Manhattan Beach off-street parking requirements are set forth in Chapter A.64 (Off-Street Parking and Loading Re gulations) of the Local Coastal Program (LCP)

1. The
following parking requirements are applicable to the site:
• Retail Sales and Services 1.0 space for each 200 SF for the first 5,000 SF, 1.0 space for each 250 SF for remainder
• Personal Improvement Services 1.0 space for each 250 SF • Eating/Drinking Establishment 1.0 space for each 50 SF seating area • Visitor Accommodations - Hotel 1.1 space per guest room • Offices and Personal Services 1.0 space for each 300 SF Existing MUP Parking Requirement
The LCP parking requirement for the Center based on the current MUP p ermitted use categories and their maximum allowable BFA are summarized in Table 3. As summarized in Table 3, the existing site-wide LCP parking requirement for the Center totals 306 spaces.

When comparing the above LCP parking requirement of 306 spaces to the existing allocated parking supply of 330 spaces, a theoretical surplus of 24 parking spaces is calculated. The parking surplus would result in 133 spaces when compared to the planned parking supply of 439 spaces.

1Source: City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program (Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations)
Erik Zandvliet, P.E.

May 8, 2024

Page 5 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4604\Memo\4604-m3.docx
Proposed MUP Amendment Parking Requirement
The LCP parking requirement for the Center based on the proposed MUP Amendment land use categories and maximum allowable BFA are summarized in Table 4. As summarized in Table 4, the site-wide LCP parking requirement for the Center totals 410 spaces. When comparing the above LCP parking requirement of 410 spaces to the existing allocated parking supply of 330 spaces, a theoretical shortfall of 80 parking spaces is calculated. The parking surplus would result in 29 spaces.

Existing Structure Parking Demand

Observations and parking accumulation surveys were conducted at the existing parking structure in order to document the current weekday and weekend parking demands.

Specifically, the parking accumulation surveys were conducted from 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM in hourly increments during the following weekday and weekend days:
• Weekday: Thursday, February 22, 2024
• Weekday: Friday, February 23, 2024
• Weekend: Saturday, February 24, 2024
The number of occupied parking spaces was noted for each parking level during each observation period. The on -site parking accumulation surveys were conducted by an independent traffic count subconsultant (The Traffic Solution). The days and time periods were selected based on the expected peak parking demand/usage associated with the Center and in consultation with City of Manhattan Beach staff. As previously noted, Unit D124 was leased but not operational during the conduct of the parking surveys.

The parking accumulation summaries for the peak Thursday, Friday, and Saturday survey time periods are summarized in Tables 5, 6 and 7, respectively. As shown in Table 5, the existing Thursday peak parking demand occurred at 1:00 PM, when a total of 361 spaces were observed to be utilized (i.e., 78.3% utilization of the 461 spaces), which resulted in a parking surplus of 100 spaces.

As shown in Table 6, the existing Friday peak parking demand occurred at 1:00 PM, when a total of 422 spaces were observed to be utilized (i.e., 91.5% utilization of the 461 spaces), which resulted in a parking surplus of 39 spaces.

As shown in Table 7, the existing Satur day peak parking demand occurred at 1:00 PM, when a total of 403 spaces were observed to be utilized (i.e., 87.4 % utilization of the 461 spaces), which resulted in a parking surplus of 58 spaces.

It is noted that the Parking Structure Level 2 w as observed to be fully occupied, ranging between 97% to 100% occupancy for the three survey days.

Erik Zandvliet, P.E.

May 8, 2024

Page 6 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4604\Memo\4604-m3.docx
Shared Parking Concept and Analysis

Based on the existing and proposed uses at the site and the parking demand principles outlined in the Urban Land Institute’s Shared Parking manual, a weekday and weekend shared parking demand model has been developed for the Center based on the proposed MUP Amendment land use categories and maximum allowable BFA.

The concept of shared parking is widely recognized within the transportation planning industry and accounts for the changes in parking demand over time for different types of land uses within a project. This shared parking analysis incorporates the analys is procedures recommended in the Shared Parking manual and is consistent with methodology used by the City of Manhattan Beach in the review and approval of shared parking applications for other multi -use centers. The Shared Parking manual provides recommendations with respect to the following characteristics of parking demand at multi- use centers:

• Hourly Parking Indices . The Shared Parking manual provides hourly parking indices for various land uses. The indices show, for example, that the hourly parking demand for office (which generates its peak parking demand during the late morning and early afternoon period) is different than the parking demand associated with a fast -food restaurant (which generates its peak parking demand concentrated around the mid-afternoon lunch period).

• Day of Week Parking Variations . The Shared Parking manual provides recommendations for day of week parking factors. For example, office/medical uses experience their peak parking demands during weekdays but experience minimal demand during weekends. Retail and restaurant uses generally have a higher demand for parking during weekends as compared to weekdays. As such, both a weekday and weekend analysis was conducted for the various uses at the Center.

Accumulated experience in parking demand characteristics indicates that a mixing of land uses results in an overall parking need that is less than the sum of the individual peak requirements for each land use. Shared parking calculations recognize that di fferent uses often experience individual peak parking demands at different times of day, or days of the week. When uses share a common parking footprint, the total number of spaces needed to support the collective whole is determined by adding parking profiles (by time of day and day of week), rather than individual peak ratios as represented in the City of Manhattan Beach LCP. In that way, the shared parking approach starts from the City's own code ratios and results in the design level parking supply needs of a site.

There is an important common element between the traditional code and the shared parking calculation methodologies; the peak parking ratios or highpoint for each land use's parking profile typically equals the code parking ratio for that use. The analytical procedures for shared parking analyses are well documented in the Shared Parking manual.

Erik Zandvliet, P.E.

May 8, 2024

Page 7 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4604\Memo\4604-m3.docx
Shared parking calculations for the project site utilize peak parking ratios and hourly parking accumulation data developed from field studies of single developments in free - standing settings, where travel by private auto is maximized. These characteristics permit the means for calculating peak parking needs when land use types are combined. Further, the shared parking approach illustrates how, at other than peak parking demand times, an increasing surplus of spaces will service the overall needs of the site.

The hourly parking demand profiles (expressed in percent of peak demand) utilized in this analysis and applied to site uses are based on profiles developed by the ULI and published in Shared Parking manual. The ULI publication presents hourly parking demand profiles for five (5) general land use categories: retail, food and beverage, entertainment, hotel and residential, and office. These profiles of parking demand have been used directly, by land use type, in the analysis of this site.

Tables 8 and 9 present the weekday and weekend parking demand profiles for the site based on the shared parking methodology assuming the proposed MUP Amendment land use categories and maximum allowable BFA. Review of Tables 8 and 9 indicates that the weekday and weekend peak parking demand is expected to occur at 12:00 PM, with peak demands of 389 and 388 spaces, respectively. Thus, the Center peak parking demand is forecast to be 389 spaces.

Based on the forecast Center peak parking demand of 389 spaces and a comparison with the prior site allocation of 330 spaces, an additional peak parking demand of 59 spaces is anticipated for the site based on the proposed MUP Amendment . As such, t he parking surplus would be reduced to 50 spaces (i.e., 109 spaces – 59 spaces = 50 spaces) during peak parking demand conditions. The shared parking tables are contained in Appendix A.

Bicycle Parking

The City of Manhattan Beach bicycle parking requirements are set forth in the City of Manhattan Beach LCP. The following parking requirement is applicable to the site:

• Commercial Uses: 5% of the required vehicle parking spaces

Based on application of the City bicycle parking requirements, a total of 21 bicycle spaces would be required for the project as summarized below:

• Bicycle Parking: 410 vehicle spaces x 0.05 = 21 spaces

A total of 18 bicycle parking spaces are currently provided on -site. The locations of the existing bicycle parking spaces are described below and shown in Figure 4.

• 13
th Street Access: 10 bicycle spaces (near elevator)
• Manhattan Beach Boulevard Access: 4 bicycle spaces (in front of Lemonade) • Valley Drive Access: 2 bicycle spaces (adjacent to parking structure entrance) • Morningside Drive Access: 2 bicycle spaces (adjacent to Nick's restaurant)

Erik Zandvliet, P.E.

May 8, 2024

Page 8 ends

O:\JOB_FILE\4604\Memo\4604-m3.docx
It is recommended that six (6) additional bicycle parking spaces be provided on-site in an effort to promote the use other modes of transportation to access the site, resulting in a total of 24 bicycle parking spaces . The proposed locations for the additional bicycle parking spaces are also shown in Figure 4.

• 13th Street Access: 2 bicycle spaces (near elevator)
• Manhattan Beach Boulevard Access: 2 bicycle spaces (in front of Look Optometry) • Morningside Drive Access: 2 bicycle spaces (adjacent to Nick's restaurant)

Summary of Key Findings and Conclusions

Based on the parking analysis, the following conclusions are made:

• The proposed 2023 Master Use Permit Amendment requests an increase in the maximum allowable square footages for the “Retail Sales and Services” (including “personal Improvement Service”) and “Eating and Drinking Establishment” use categories for the Center.
• Direct application of the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program would yield a total parking requirement for the Center totals 410 spaces. • A shared parking analysis has been prepared for the site based on the proposed MUP Amendment land use categories and maximum allowable BFA. Based on the shared parking analysis, the weekday and weekend peak parking demand is forecast to be 389 and 388 spaces, respectively.
• Based on the forecast Center peak parking demand of 389 spaces and a comparison with the prior site allocation of 330 spaces, an additional peak parking demand of 59 spaces is anticipated for the site based on the proposed MUP Amendment , resulting in a surplus of 50 spaces during peak parking demand conditions. • It is recommended that six (6) additional bicycle parking spaces be provided on- site in an effort to promote the use other modes of transportation to access the site.

Please feel free to call us at 626.796.2322 with any questions or comments regarding the parking assessment prepared for the Metlox Shopping Center.

cc: File
Jonathan Tolkin, Tolkin Group

Figure 2Parking Structure Level 1Metlox Shopping Center Project N
Parking AreaNot to Scale
A1
A7
A2
A10
A8A6A5A4A3 A9
V1
XX

RESERVED

Figure 4Existing and Proposed Bicycle Parking Locations N
Existing Bicycle ParkingNot to ScaleProposed Bicycle ParkingMetlox Shopping Center Project Morningside Dr
Valley Dr
13th St
Manhanttan Beach Blvd

SIZE
PARKING Floor Area/
SUITE NO. TENANT NAME CLASSIFICATION No. of Rooms
A132 Le Pain Quotidien Food and Beverage Sales 1,331
B100, B200 The Beehive Retail 3,765
B102 Lemonade Food and Beverage Sales 2,376
B104 Verve Coffee Roasters Food and Beverage Sales 921
B108 Laird Apparel Retail 926
B110, B212 Petros Benekos Eating and Drinking Establishment 3,914 B202 Reliance Steel & Aluminium Company Office, Business and Professional 2,567 B210 Kasai Hair Personal Services 896
C232,C236 Imagen Beach Teeth Personal Services 2,013
D114 Paige Denim Retail 2,426
D116 Nordstrom Local Retail 1,746
D118 Kreation Juice Food and Beverage Sales 822
D120 Look! Optometry Personal Services 796
D122 Lulu's Nouvelle Retail 638
D124 Wright's Men (Leased) Food and Beverage Sales 1,137 D126 Nick's Manhattan Beach Eating and Drinking Establishment 4,373 D220 Coldwell Banker Realty Office, Business and Professional 1,534 D222 Beam Aesthetic Lounge Personal Services 723
D224, D216 Summer Orthodontics Office, Medical and Dental 2,616 D226 Janella Holden Tanner, D.D.S. Office, Medical and Dental 3,069 1210 Morningside Drive Waterleaf Retail 2,623
1221 N. Valley Dr Shade Hotel Hotel 38
Table 1

TENANT LIST
Metlox Center
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center Project
NO. OF SPACES BY USER TYPE
EV
Handicap 3 Hour Limit Charging 10 Hour Limit EV [2] TOTAL NO.

Van Car Standard Compact 2 Hr Limit Standard Compact Standard Reserved Charging Blocked OF SPACES Level 1
A-1 12 3 15
A-2 25 25
A-3 1 3 24 1 29
A-4 1 3 24 1 29
A-5 15 1 16
A-6 2 14 1 17
A-7 4 4
A-8 8 3 4 15
A-9 1 6 7
A-10 11 11
V-1 24 1 2 5 32
Subtotal 2 8 127 27 4 0 0 24 1 2 5 200
Level 2
B-1 15 6 21
B-2 39 3 42
B-3 31 31
B-4 31 31
B-5 23 23
B-6 23 23
B-7 18 18
B-8 18 18
B-9 21 21
B-10 16 3 19
B-11 11 11
B-12 3 3
Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 235 26 0 0 0 0 261
Total Parking 2 8 127 27 4 235 26 24 1 2 5 461
[1] Parking inventory conducted by LLG in February 2024. [2] These marked parking spaces are shown and included in the inventory, but were blocked at the time of the parking inventory.

PARKING

LOCATION
Table 2
SUMMARY OF PARKING INVENTORY [1]
Valet
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center Project
Size Total
Existing Uses [1] (Gross Floor Spaces
Parking Classification Area [SF]/Rooms Required
5,000 1 /200 sf 25
15,000 1 /250 sf 60
Eating and Drinking Establishment 6,400 1 /50 sf seating area 128 Visitor Accomodations - Hotel [3] 38 1.1 /guest room 35 Offices and Personal Services 17,500 1 /300 sf 58
Total Code Required Parking 306
Notes:
[2] City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations [3] Parking requirement for hotel use per the 2018 Master Use Permit. [1] Permitted uses based on the 2002 Master Use Permit (MUP)(Resolution No. 5770), Coastal Development Permit (A5-MNB-02-257) and MUP Amendment (Resolution No. 18-0074).

Table 3

CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Metlox Center Permitted Land Uses
[2]
Code
Parking Ratio
Retail Sales and Personal Improvement
Services
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center
Size Total
Land Use [1] (Gross Floor Spaces
Parking Classification Area [SF]/Rooms Required
5,000 1 /200 sf 25
10,044 1 /250 sf 40
Personal Improvement Services 7,576 1 /250 sf 30
Eating and Drinking Establishment 13,770 1 /50 sf seating area 275 Offices and Personal Services 1,518 1 /300 sf 5
Visitor Accomodations - Hotel [3] 38 1.1 /guest room 35 Total Code Required Parking 410
Notes:
[1] Land uses reflect the maximum allowable land uses within the Center. [2] City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations. [3] Parking requirement for hotel use per the 2018 Master Use Permit.

Retail Sales
Table 4

CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Metlox Center Proposed Maximum Allowable Land Uses
[2]
Code
Parking Ratio
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center
Table 5
WEEKDAY PARKING SUPPLY/UTILIZATION [1]
DATE: Thursday, February 22, 2024

PARKING SPACES
PARKING 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM AREA PARKING SPACE TYPE SUPPLY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % LEVEL 1
A1 Standard/Compact 15 1 6.7% 1 6.7% 3 20.0% 5 33.3% 7 46.7% 8 53.3% 5 33.3% 8 53.3% 8 53.3% 8 53.3% 12 80.0% 10 66.7% 7 46.7% A2 Standard 25 5 20.0% 7 28.0% 6 24.0% 10 40.0% 13 52.0% 10 40.0% 10 40.0% 6 24.0% 7 28.0% 9 36.0% 14 56.0% 11 44.0% 8 32.0% A3 Standard/Compact 25 3 12.0% 3 12.0% 5 20.0% 11 44.0% 12 48.0% 8 32.0% 9 36.0% 10 40.0% 8 32.0% 15 60.0% 17 68.0% 8 32.0% 7 28.0% Handicap 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% A4 Standard 25 8 32.0% 7 28.0% 9 36.0% 18 72.0% 21 84.0% 17 68.0% 15 60.0% 12 48.0% 12 48.0% 16 64.0% 21 84.0% 11 44.0% 6 24.0% Handicap 4 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% A5 Standard/Compact 16 2 12.5% 3 18.8% 5 31.3% 11 68.8% 13 81.3% 9 56.3% 11 68.8% 10 62.5% 6 37.5% 11 68.8% 16 100.0% 12 75.0% 7 43.8% A6 Standard/Compact 15 3 20.0% 6 40.0% 8 53.3% 15 100.0% 15 100.0% 12 80.0% 9 60.0% 8 53.3% 8 53.3% 14 93.3% 14 93.3% 8 53.3% 7 46.7% Handicap 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% A7 Standard 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% A8 Standard/Compact 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 27.3% 8 72.7% 5 45.5% 4 36.4% 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 3 27.3% 5 45.5% 5 45.5% 2 18.2% EV/2-Hour 4 3 75.0% 4 100.0% 3 75.0% 3 75.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% A9 Standard/Compact 7 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% A10 Compact 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 2 18.2% 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% V1 Standard 24 11 45.8% 10 41.7% 11 45.8% 13 54.2% 12 50.0% 12 50.0% 14 58.3% 13 54.2% 14 58.3% 18 75.0% 20 83.3% 8 33.3% 10 41.7% EV 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% Reserved 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% Blocked 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Subtotal Level 1 Parking 200 38 19.0% 43 21.5% 54 27.0% 93 46.5% 107 53.5% 91 45.5% 84 42.0% 77 38.5% 70 35.0% 99 49.5% 126 63.0% 81 40.5% 60 30.0% LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center Project
Table 5 (Continued)
WEEKDAY PARKING SUPPLY/UTILIZATION [1]
DATE: Thursday, February 22, 2024

PARKING SPACES
PARKING 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM AREA PARKING SPACE TYPE SUPPLY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % LEVEL 2
B1 Standard/Compact 21 3 14.3% 6 28.6% 17 81.0% 19 90.5% 21 100.0% 21 100.0% 21 100.0% 21 100.0% 20 95.2% 17 81.0% 17 81.0% 16 76.2% 15 71.4% B2 Standard/Compact 42 24 57.1% 30 71.4% 40 95.2% 42 100.0% 41 97.6% 41 97.6% 41 97.6% 38 90.5% 41 97.6% 22 52.4% 16 38.1% 15 35.7% 13 31.0% B3 Standard 31 25 80.6% 30 96.8% 31 100.0% 31 100.0% 31 100.0% 29 93.5% 30 96.8% 31 100.0% 28 90.3% 21 67.7% 15 48.4% 14 45.2% 12 38.7% B4 Standard 31 26 83.9% 31 100.0% 31 100.0% 31 100.0% 31 100.0% 29 93.5% 31 100.0% 28 90.3% 23 74.2% 13 41.9% 10 32.3% 11 35.5% 9 29.0% B5 Standard 23 12 52.2% 23 100.0% 22 95.7% 22 95.7% 22 95.7% 22 95.7% 20 87.0% 23 100.0% 18 78.3% 16 69.6% 12 52.2% 9 39.1% 7 30.4% B6 Standard 23 9 39.1% 20 87.0% 22 95.7% 22 95.7% 22 95.7% 22 95.7% 21 91.3% 23 100.0% 21 91.3% 16 69.6% 12 52.2% 10 43.5% 7 30.4% B7 Standard 18 9 50.0% 15 83.3% 18 100.0% 18 100.0% 18 100.0% 17 94.4% 17 94.4% 18 100.0% 18 100.0% 14 77.8% 12 66.7% 12 66.7% 12 66.7% B8 Standard 18 10 55.6% 14 77.8% 16 88.9% 18 100.0% 18 100.0% 17 94.4% 18 100.0% 16 88.9% 16 88.9% 12 66.7% 10 55.6% 10 55.6% 9 50.0% B9 Standard 21 6 28.6% 9 42.9% 20 95.2% 21 100.0% 20 95.2% 17 81.0% 19 90.5% 21 100.0% 18 85.7% 15 71.4% 15 71.4% 14 66.7% 8 38.1% B10 Standard/Compact 19 2 10.5% 7 36.8% 9 47.4% 16 84.2% 18 94.7% 19 100.0% 19 100.0% 17 89.5% 17 89.5% 16 84.2% 13 68.4% 13 68.4% 9 47.4% B11 Compact 11 1 9.1% 4 36.4% 6 54.5% 9 81.8% 9 81.8% 10 90.9% 10 90.9% 10 90.9% 10 90.9% 7 63.6% 5 45.5% 4 36.4% 4 36.4% B12 Compact 3 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% Subtotal Level 2 Parking 261 128 49.0% 190 72.8% 234 89.7% 251 96.2% 254 97.3% 247 94.6% 250 95.8% 249 95.4% 233 89.3% 172 65.9% 140 53.6% 131 50.2% 108 41.4% Total Parking 461 166 36.0% 233 50.5% 288 62.5% 344 74.6% 361 78.3% 338 73.3% 334 72.5% 326 70.7% 303 65.7% 271 58.8% 266 57.7% 212 46.0% 168 36.4% [1] Parking counts conducted by The Traffic Solution.
[2] Inventory conducted by LLG Engineers in February 2024.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center Project
Table 6

WEEKDAY PARKING SUPPLY/UTILIZATION
DATE: Friday, February 23, 2024

PARKING SPACES
PARKING 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM AREA PARKING SPACE TYPE SUPPLY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % LEVEL 1
A1 Standard/Compact 15 2 13.3% 5 33.3% 9 60.0% 9 60.0% 10 66.7% 10 66.7% 10 66.7% 10 66.7% 9 60.0% 11 73.3% 13 86.7% 14 93.3% 12 80.0% A2 Standard 25 3 12.0% 5 20.0% 5 20.0% 8 32.0% 19 76.0% 19 76.0% 10 40.0% 7 28.0% 8 32.0% 15 60.0% 21 84.0% 21 84.0% 11 44.0% A3 Standard/Compact 25 5 20.0% 8 32.0% 12 48.0% 19 76.0% 22 88.0% 20 80.0% 15 60.0% 13 52.0% 13 52.0% 16 64.0% 21 84.0% 19 76.0% 16 64.0% Handicap 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% A4 Standard 25 6 24.0% 11 44.0% 15 60.0% 22 88.0% 25 100.0% 23 92.0% 19 76.0% 17 68.0% 19 76.0% 23 92.0% 25 100.0% 20 80.0% 11 44.0% Handicap 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 3 75.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% A5 Standard/Compact 16 4 25.0% 6 37.5% 6 37.5% 14 87.5% 16 100.0% 11 68.8% 7 43.8% 10 62.5% 8 50.0% 13 81.3% 16 100.0% 11 68.8% 9 56.3% A6 Standard/Compact 15 2 13.3% 6 40.0% 8 53.3% 15 100.0% 15 100.0% 15 100.0% 12 80.0% 15 100.0% 11 73.3% 15 6.5% 15 100.0% 14 93.3% 10 66.7% Handicap 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% A7 Standard 4 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 3 75.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% A8 Standard/Compact 11 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 6 54.5% 11 100.0% 10 90.9% 5 45.5% 3 27.3% 2 18.2% 8 72.7% 10 90.9% 5 45.5% 2 18.2% EV/2-Hour 4 2 50.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 2 50.0% 4 100.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 3 75.0% 2 50.0% A9 Standard/Compact 7 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 5 71.4% 7 100.0% 6 85.7% 5 71.4% 5 71.4% 4 57.1% 4 57.1% 4 57.1% 5 71.4% 5 71.4% A10 Compact 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 90.9% 11 100.0% 5 45.5% 4 36.4% 4 36.4% 4 36.4% 6 54.5% 5 45.5% 4 36.4% V1 Standard 24 11 45.8% 10 41.7% 8 33.3% 9 37.5% 12 50.0% 11 45.8% 10 41.7% 12 50.0% 11 45.8% 10 41.7% 11 45.8% 9 37.5% 9 37.5% EV 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Reserved 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% Blocked 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Subtotal Level 1 Parking 200 38 19.0% 59 29.5% 74 37.0% 117 58.5% 161 80.5% 147 73.5% 107 53.5% 102 51.0% 94 47.0% 126 63.0% 150 75.0% 128 64.0% 93 46.5% LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center Project
Table 6 (Continued)

WEEKDAY PARKING SUPPLY/UTILIZATION
DATE: Friday, February 23, 2024

PARKING SPACES
PARKING 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM AREA PARKING SPACE TYPE SUPPLY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % LEVEL 2
B1 Standard/Compact 21 4 19.0% 6 28.6% 17 81.0% 21 100.0% 21 100.0% 21 100.0% 20 95.2% 19 90.5% 18 85.7% 17 81.0% 18 85.7% 16 76.2% 15 71.4% B2 Standard/Compact 42 21 50.0% 29 69.0% 39 92.9% 42 100.0% 42 100.0% 40 95.2% 40 95.2% 40 95.2% 37 88.1% 27 64.3% 22 52.4% 19 45.2% 17 40.5% B3 Standard 31 21 67.7% 27 87.1% 30 96.8% 31 100.0% 31 100.0% 30 96.8% 30 96.8% 31 100.0% 30 96.8% 17 54.8% 15 48.4% 14 45.2% 10 32.3% B4 Standard 31 25 80.6% 29 93.5% 30 96.8% 31 100.0% 31 100.0% 30 96.8% 29 93.5% 30 96.8% 21 67.7% 17 54.8% 16 51.6% 18 58.1% 12 38.7% B5 Standard 23 14 60.9% 23 100.0% 23 100.0% 23 100.0% 23 100.0% 23 100.0% 23 100.0% 22 95.7% 19 82.6% 15 65.2% 13 56.5% 12 52.2% 11 47.8% B6 Standard 23 11 47.8% 14 60.9% 22 95.7% 23 100.0% 23 100.0% 22 95.7% 22 95.7% 22 95.7% 21 91.3% 18 78.3% 13 56.5% 11 47.8% 9 39.1% B7 Standard 18 11 61.1% 16 88.9% 18 100.0% 18 100.0% 18 100.0% 17 94.4% 17 94.4% 17 94.4% 16 88.9% 14 77.8% 11 61.1% 8 44.4% 6 33.3% B8 Standard 18 12 66.7% 14 77.8% 18 100.0% 18 100.0% 18 100.0% 16 88.9% 18 100.0% 17 94.4% 17 94.4% 15 83.3% 12 66.7% 11 61.1% 11 61.1% B9 Standard 21 5 23.8% 7 33.3% 20 95.2% 20 95.2% 21 100.0% 21 100.0% 20 95.2% 20 95.2% 18 85.7% 17 81.0% 17 81.0% 17 81.0% 14 66.7% B10 Standard/Compact 19 3 15.8% 8 42.1% 12 63.2% 19 100.0% 19 100.0% 19 100.0% 17 89.5% 16 84.2% 18 94.7% 16 84.2% 17 89.5% 17 89.5% 15 78.9% B11 Compact 11 2 18.2% 3 27.3% 6 54.5% 10 90.9% 11 100.0% 11 100.0% 11 100.0% 11 100.0% 7 63.6% 4 36.4% 4 36.4% 1 9.1% 1 9.1% B12 Compact 3 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0% Subtotal Level 2 Parking 261 130 49.8% 177 67.8% 237 90.8% 259 99.2% 261 100.0% 253 96.9% 250 95.8% 248 95.0% 225 86.2% 180 69.0% 161 61.7% 147 56.3% 124 47.5% Total Parking 461 168 36.4% 236 51.2% 311 67.5% 376 81.6% 422 91.5% 400 86.8% 357 77.4% 350 75.9% 319 69.2% 306 66.4% 311 67.5% 275 59.7% 217 47.1% [1] Parking counts conducted by The Traffic Solution.
[2] Inventory conducted by LLG Engineers in February 2024.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center Project
Table 7

WEEKEND PARKING SUPPLY/UTILIZATION
DATE: Saturday, February 24, 2024

PARKING SPACES
PARKING 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM AREA PARKING SPACE TYPE SUPPLY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % LEVEL 1
A1 Standard/Compact 15 3 20.0% 3 20.0% 6 40.0% 11 73.3% 13 86.7% 12 80.0% 8 53.3% 7 46.7% 11 73.3% 13 86.7% 13 86.7% 11 73.3% 6 40.0% A2 Standard 25 2 8.0% 3 12.0% 6 24.0% 18 72.0% 23 92.0% 22 88.0% 16 64.0% 8 32.0% 13 52.0% 16 64.0% 15 60.0% 7 28.0% 4 16.0% A3 Standard/Compact 25 4 16.0% 7 28.0% 12 48.0% 21 84.0% 25 100.0% 22 88.0% 18 72.0% 15 60.0% 21 84.0% 24 96.0% 20 80.0% 22 88.0% 19 76.0% Handicap 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% A4 Standard 25 8 32.0% 13 52.0% 22 88.0% 25 100.0% 25 100.0% 24 96.0% 21 84.0% 21 84.0% 23 92.0% 24 96.0% 20 80.0% 22 88.0% 19 76.0% Handicap 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% A5 Standard/Compact 16 3 18.8% 7 43.8% 9 56.3% 16 100.0% 16 100.0% 13 81.3% 13 81.3% 12 75.0% 13 81.3% 14 87.5% 15 93.8% 14 87.5% 10 62.5% A6 Standard/Compact 15 1 6.7% 7 46.7% 15 100.0% 15 100.0% 15 100.0% 15 100.0% 15 100.0% 14 93.3% 15 100.0% 15 100.0% 15 100.0% 14 93.3% 12 80.0% Handicap 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% A7 Standard 4 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% A8 Standard/Compact 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 27.3% 11 100.0% 11 100.0% 11 100.0% 11 100.0% 10 90.9% 9 81.8% 9 81.8% 8 72.7% 6 54.5% 3 27.3% EV/2-Hour 4 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 100.0% 3 75.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 3 75.0% 3 75.0% 3 75.0% 3 75.0% A9 Standard/Compact 7 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 7 100.0% 7 100.0% 5 71.4% 7 100.0% 6 85.7% 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 1 14.3% A10 Compact 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 10 90.9% 11 100.0% 10 90.9% 9 81.8% 9 81.8% 9 81.8% 9 81.8% 6 54.5% 4 36.4% 4 36.4% V1 Standard 24 9 37.5% 9 37.5% 9 37.5% 9 37.5% 9 37.5% 10 41.7% 12 50.0% 14 58.3% 15 62.5% 17 70.8% 17 70.8% 17 70.8% 17 70.8% EV 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 100.0% Reserved 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% Blocked 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Subtotal Level 1 Parking 200 34 17.0% 55 27.5% 91 45.5% 151 75.5% 167 83.5% 161 80.5% 139 69.5% 127 63.5% 146 73.0% 155 77.5% 142 71.0% 130 65.0% 105 52.5% LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center Project
Table 7 (Continued)

WEEKEND PARKING SUPPLY/UTILIZATION
DATE: Saturday, February 24, 2024

PARKING SPACES
PARKING 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM AREA PARKING SPACE TYPE SUPPLY NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % LEVEL 2
B1 Standard/Compact 21 4 19.0% 6 28.6% 10 47.6% 12 57.1% 15 71.4% 19 90.5% 20 95.2% 16 76.2% 17 81.0% 18 85.7% 17 81.0% 14 66.7% 13 61.9% B2 Standard/Compact 42 14 33.3% 18 42.9% 26 61.9% 37 88.1% 42 100.0% 40 95.2% 38 90.5% 32 76.2% 32 76.2% 33 78.6% 28 66.7% 25 59.5% 21 50.0% B3 Standard 31 11 35.5% 18 58.1% 23 74.2% 25 80.6% 31 100.0% 29 93.5% 28 90.3% 27 87.1% 24 77.4% 21 67.7% 20 64.5% 16 51.6% 14 45.2% B4 Standard 31 15 48.4% 23 74.2% 26 83.9% 30 96.8% 31 100.0% 27 87.1% 30 96.8% 24 77.4% 23 74.2% 22 71.0% 17 54.8% 14 45.2% 9 29.0% B5 Standard 23 12 52.2% 17 73.9% 22 95.7% 23 100.0% 23 100.0% 23 100.0% 23 100.0% 19 82.6% 16 69.6% 13 56.5% 10 43.5% 6 26.1% 6 26.1% B6 Standard 23 10 43.5% 13 56.5% 14 60.9% 18 78.3% 19 82.6% 17 73.9% 15 65.2% 15 65.2% 15 65.2% 15 65.2% 12 52.2% 11 47.8% 7 30.4% B7 Standard 18 7 38.9% 11 61.1% 15 83.3% 15 83.3% 16 88.9% 16 88.9% 17 94.4% 17 94.4% 14 77.8% 12 66.7% 12 66.7% 12 66.7% 11 61.1% B8 Standard 18 3 16.7% 5 27.8% 12 66.7% 13 72.2% 16 88.9% 14 77.8% 13 72.2% 14 77.8% 13 72.2% 12 66.7% 12 66.7% 12 66.7% 11 61.1% B9 Standard 21 5 23.8% 7 33.3% 16 76.2% 18 85.7% 18 85.7% 18 85.7% 18 85.7% 21 100.0% 19 90.5% 18 85.7% 18 85.7% 16 76.2% 11 52.4% B10 Standard/Compact 19 3 15.8% 3 15.8% 7 36.8% 9 47.4% 13 68.4% 17 89.5% 15 78.9% 19 100.0% 16 84.2% 14 73.7% 12 63.2% 12 63.2% 12 63.2% B11 Compact 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 5 45.5% 10 90.9% 10 90.9% 7 63.6% 6 54.5% 4 36.4% 3 27.3% 2 18.2% 2 18.2% 2 18.2% B12 Compact 3 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 3 100.0% 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 2 66.7% Subtotal Level 2 Parking 261 84 32.2% 122 46.7% 174 66.7% 207 79.3% 236 90.4% 233 89.3% 226 86.6% 212 81.2% 195 74.7% 183 70.1% 162 62.1% 142 54.4% 119 45.6% Total Parking 461 118 25.6% 177 38.4% 265 57.5% 358 77.7% 403 87.4% 394 85.5% 365 79.2% 339 73.5% 341 74.0% 338 73.3% 304 65.9% 272 59.0% 224 48.6% [1] Parking counts conducted by The Traffic Solution.
[2] Inventory conducted by LLG Engineers in February 2024.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center Project
Land Use
Size 15.0 KSF 7.6 KSF 13.8 KSF 38 Rms 1.5 KSF
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 4.0 /KSF 4.00 /KSF 20.0 /KSF 1.10 /Rm 3.33 /KSF Weekday Pkg Rate[3] 3.6 /KSF 3.6 /KSF 20.0 /KSF 1.10 /Rm 3.33 /KSF Gross Spaces 54 Spc. 22 Spc. 275 Spc. 42 Spc. 5 Spc.

Adjusted Gross 54 Spc. 22 Spc. 275 Spc. 42 Spc. 5 Spc.

Spaces[4] Shared 461 Spaces
Parking
Time of Day Demand
6:00 AM 77 36 115
7:00 AM 147 37 191
8:00 AM 176 38 231
9:00 AM 212 35 282
10:00 AM 239 31 326
11:00 AM 251 31 352
12:00 PM 275 29 389
1:00 PM 251 29 365
2:00 PM 155 31 269
3:00 PM 134 31 241
4:00 PM 134 32 241
5:00 PM 213 34 321
6:00 PM 225 33 334
7:00 PM 225 32 326
8:00 PM 225 34 316
9:00 PM 172 36 247
10:00 PM 155 36 207
11:00 PM 203 38 247
12:00 AM 72 37 109
Notes:

Number of
Spaces
1 2
4 10
17 22
27 0
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. [3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
0 0
0 0
1 1
4 3
5 5
5 4
4 0
1 5
5 3
145
214
254
214
352
220
220
140
127
135
135
109
72 96
192
(Deficiency)
346
270
230
179
Spaces
Table 8
Office
Number of
Comparison w/
Parking Supply [5]
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Surplus
Retail
Number of
Spaces
Personal
Improvement
Services
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction. [5] The total parking supply of 461 spaces is planned to be provided on-site. 11 4
0 50
45 38
26 1
4 10
20 34
43 54
54 52
5 2
0 [1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020. 27 26
24 24
24 25
23 19
13 47
47 47
Family
Restaurant Leisure Hotel
Number of
Spaces
Number of
Spaces
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center Project
Land Use
Size 15.0 KSF 7.6 KSF 13.8 KSF 38 Rms 1.5 KSF
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 4.00 /KSF 4.00 /KSF 20.0 /KSF 1.10 /Rm 3.33 /KSF Weekend Pkg Rate[3] 4.00 /KSF 4.00 /KSF 19.7 /KSF 1.10 /Rm 0.33 /KSF Gross Spaces 60 Spc. 30 Spc. 271 Spc. 42 Spc. 1 Spc.

Adjusted Gross 60 Spc. 30 Spc. 271 Spc. 42 Spc. 1 Spc.

Spaces[4] Shared 461 Spaces
Parking
Time of Day Demand
6:00 AM 41 36 79
7:00 AM 85 37 128
8:00 AM 137 38 204
9:00 AM 197 35 283
10:00 AM 247 31 345
11:00 AM 247 31 361
12:00 PM 271 29 388
1:00 PM 235 29 355
2:00 PM 188 31 310
3:00 PM 120 31 238
4:00 PM 132 32 247
5:00 PM 174 34 282
6:00 PM 198 33 300
7:00 PM 198 32 296
8:00 PM 186 34 281
9:00 PM 97 36 181
10:00 PM 81 36 146
11:00 PM 57 38 105
12:00 AM 36 37 73
Notes:
1 2
9 17
22 28
29 30
30 29
28 25
23 22
21 16
10 3
0 Personal
Improvement
Services
Number of
Spaces
356
0 388
0 280
0 315
0 165
0 180
0 179
0 161
0 223
0 214
0 106
1 151
1 100
1 73
1 178
1 116
1 333
1 257
0 0 382
Spaces
Office
Table 9
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Retail Leisure Hotel
[5] The total parking supply of 461 spaces is planned to be provided on-site. [4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction. [2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. [3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.

Comparison w/
Parking Supply [5]
Number of Surplus
(Deficiency)
44 40
32 Number of
Spaces
1 4
19 33
44 54
58 60
60 58
55 49
46 [1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020. 19 7
0 Number of
Spaces
Number of
Spaces
Family
Restaurant
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers
LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1
Metlox Shopping Center Project
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-24-4604-1 Metlox Shopping Center Project

ATTACHMENT A

SHARED PARKING DATA
Attachment Table A-1
RETAIL
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Land Use Retail
Size 15.0 KSF
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 4.0 /KSF
Weekday Pkg Rate[3] 3.6 /KSF
Gross Spaces 54 Spaces
Adjusted Gross 1.00 54 Spaces
Spaces[4] 44 Guest Spc. 10 Emp. Spc. Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 1% 0 10% 1 1
7:00 AM 5% 2 15% 2 4
8:00 AM 15% 7 25% 3 10
9:00 AM 35% 15 45% 5 20
10:00 AM 60% 26 75% 8 34
11:00 AM 75% 33 95% 10 43
12:00 PM 100% 44 100% 10 54
1:00 PM 100% 44 100% 10 54
2:00 PM 95% 42 100% 10 52
3:00 PM 85% 37 100% 10 47
4:00 PM 85% 37 100% 10 47
5:00 PM 85% 37 100% 10 47
6:00 PM 90% 40 100% 10 50
7:00 PM 80% 35 100% 10 45
8:00 PM 65% 29 90% 9 38
9:00 PM 45% 20 60% 6 26
10:00 PM 15% 7 40% 4 11
11:00 PM 5% 2 20% 2 4
12:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020.
[3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements.
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction.

Attachment Table A-1
RETAIL
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Land Use Retail
Size 15.0 KSF
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 4.0 /KSF
Weekend Pkg Rate[3] 4.0 /KSF
Gross Spaces 60 Spaces
Adjusted Gross 1.00 60 Spaces
Spaces[4] 48 Guest Spc. 12 Emp. Spc. Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 1% 0 10% 1 1
7:00 AM 5% 2 15% 2 4
8:00 AM 30% 14 40% 5 19
9:00 AM 50% 24 75% 9 33
10:00 AM 70% 34 85% 10 44
11:00 AM 90% 43 95% 11 54
12:00 PM 95% 46 100% 12 58
1:00 PM 100% 48 100% 12 60
2:00 PM 100% 48 100% 12 60
3:00 PM 95% 46 100% 12 58
4:00 PM 90% 43 100% 12 55
5:00 PM 80% 38 95% 11 49
6:00 PM 75% 36 85% 10 46
7:00 PM 70% 34 80% 10 44
8:00 PM 65% 31 75% 9 40
9:00 PM 50% 24 65% 8 32
10:00 PM 30% 14 45% 5 19
11:00 PM 10% 5 15% 2 7
12:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0
Notes:
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction.
[1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020.
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements.
[3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.

Attachment Table A-2

PERSONAL IMPROVEMENT SERVICES (RETAIL)
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Land Use Personal Improvement Services (Retail)
Size 7.6 KSF
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 4.0 /KSF
Weekday Pkg Rate[3] 3.6 /KSF
Gross Spaces 27 Spaces
Adjusted Gross 1.00 27 Spaces
Spaces[4] 22 Guest Spc. 5 Emp. Spc. Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 1% 0 10% 1 1
7:00 AM 5% 1 15% 1 2
8:00 AM 15% 3 25% 1 4
9:00 AM 35% 8 45% 2 10
10:00 AM 60% 13 75% 4 17
11:00 AM 75% 17 95% 5 22
12:00 PM 100% 22 100% 5 27
1:00 PM 100% 22 100% 5 27
2:00 PM 95% 21 100% 5 26
3:00 PM 85% 19 100% 5 24
4:00 PM 85% 19 100% 5 24
5:00 PM 85% 19 100% 5 24
6:00 PM 90% 20 100% 5 25
7:00 PM 80% 18 100% 5 23
8:00 PM 65% 14 90% 5 19
9:00 PM 45% 10 60% 3 13
10:00 PM 15% 3 40% 2 5
11:00 PM 5% 1 20% 1 2
12:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020.
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements.
[3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction.

Attachment Table A-2

PERSONAL IMPROVEMENT SERVICES (RETAIL)
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Land Use Personal Improvement Services (Retail)
Size 7.6 KSF
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 4.0 /KSF
Weekend Pkg Rate[3] 4.0 /KSF
Gross Spaces 30 Spaces
Adjusted Gross 1.00 30 Spaces
Spaces[4] 24 Guest Spc. 6 Emp. Spc. Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 1% 0 10% 1 1
7:00 AM 5% 1 15% 1 2
8:00 AM 30% 7 40% 2 9
9:00 AM 50% 12 75% 5 17
10:00 AM 70% 17 85% 5 22
11:00 AM 90% 22 95% 6 28
12:00 PM 95% 23 100% 6 29
1:00 PM 100% 24 100% 6 30
2:00 PM 100% 24 100% 6 30
3:00 PM 95% 23 100% 6 29
4:00 PM 90% 22 100% 6 28
5:00 PM 80% 19 95% 6 25
6:00 PM 75% 18 85% 5 23
7:00 PM 70% 17 80% 5 22
8:00 PM 65% 16 75% 5 21
9:00 PM 50% 12 65% 4 16
10:00 PM 30% 7 45% 3 10
11:00 PM 10% 2 15% 1 3
12:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0
Notes:
[3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction.
[1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020.
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements.

Attachment Table A-3

RESTAURANT
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Land Use Restaurant
Size 13.8 KSF
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 20.0 /KSF
Weekday Pkg Rate[3] 20.0 /KSF
Gross Spaces 275 Spaces
Adjusted Gross 1.00 275 Spaces
Spaces[4] 241 Guest Spc. 34 Emp. Spc. Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 25% 60 50% 17 77
7:00 AM 50% 121 75% 26 147
8:00 AM 60% 145 90% 31 176
9:00 AM 75% 181 90% 31 212
10:00 AM 85% 205 100% 34 239
11:00 AM 90% 217 100% 34 251
12:00 PM 100% 241 100% 34 275
1:00 PM 90% 217 100% 34 251
2:00 PM 50% 121 100% 34 155
3:00 PM 45% 108 75% 26 134
4:00 PM 45% 108 75% 26 134
5:00 PM 75% 181 95% 32 213
6:00 PM 80% 193 95% 32 225
7:00 PM 80% 193 95% 32 225
8:00 PM 80% 193 95% 32 225
9:00 PM 60% 145 80% 27 172
10:00 PM 55% 133 65% 22 155
11:00 PM 75% 181 65% 22 203
12:00 AM 25% 60 35% 12 72
Notes:
[1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020.
[3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements.
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction.

Attachment Table A-3

RESTAURANT
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Land Use Restaurant
Size 13.8 KSF
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 20.0 /KSF
Weekend Pkg Rate[3] 19.7 /KSF
Gross Spaces 271 Spaces
Adjusted Gross 1.00 271 Spaces
Spaces[4] 238 Guest Spc. 33 Emp. Spc. Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 10% 24 50% 17 41
7:00 AM 25% 60 75% 25 85
8:00 AM 45% 107 90% 30 137
9:00 AM 70% 167 90% 30 197
10:00 AM 90% 214 100% 33 247
11:00 AM 90% 214 100% 33 247
12:00 PM 100% 238 100% 33 271
1:00 PM 85% 202 100% 33 235
2:00 PM 65% 155 100% 33 188
3:00 PM 40% 95 75% 25 120
4:00 PM 45% 107 75% 25 132
5:00 PM 60% 143 95% 31 174
6:00 PM 70% 167 95% 31 198
7:00 PM 70% 167 95% 31 198
8:00 PM 65% 155 95% 31 186
9:00 PM 30% 71 80% 26 97
10:00 PM 25% 60 65% 21 81
11:00 PM 15% 36 65% 21 57
12:00 AM 10% 24 35% 12 36
Notes:
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction.
[3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
[1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020.
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements.

Land Use Leisure Hotel
Size 38 Rooms
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 1.10 /Room
Weekday Pkg Rate[3] 1.10 /Room
Gross Spaces 42 Spaces
Adjusted Gross 1.00 42 Spaces
Spaces[4] 37 Guest Spc. 5 Emp. Spc. Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 95% 35 10% 1 36
7:00 AM 95% 35 30% 2 37
8:00 AM 90% 33 100% 5 38
9:00 AM 80% 30 100% 5 35
10:00 AM 70% 26 100% 5 31
11:00 AM 70% 26 100% 5 31
12:00 PM 65% 24 100% 5 29
1:00 PM 65% 24 100% 5 29
2:00 PM 70% 26 100% 5 31
3:00 PM 70% 26 100% 5 31
4:00 PM 75% 28 70% 4 32
5:00 PM 80% 30 70% 4 34
6:00 PM 85% 31 40% 2 33
7:00 PM 85% 31 20% 1 32
8:00 PM 90% 33 20% 1 34
9:00 PM 95% 35 20% 1 36
10:00 PM 95% 35 20% 1 36
11:00 PM 100% 37 10% 1 38
12:00 AM 100% 37 5% 0 37
Notes:
[1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020.
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements.
[3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction.

Appendix Table A-4

LEISURE HOTEL
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Land Use Leisure Hotel
Size 38 Rooms
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 1.10 /Room
Weekend Pkg Rate[3] 1.10 /Room
Gross Spaces 42 Spaces
Adjusted Gross 1.00 42 Spaces
Spaces[4] 37 Guest Spc. 5 Emp. Spc. Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 95% 35 10% 1 36
7:00 AM 95% 35 30% 2 37
8:00 AM 90% 33 100% 5 38
9:00 AM 80% 30 100% 5 35
10:00 AM 70% 26 100% 5 31
11:00 AM 70% 26 100% 5 31
12:00 PM 65% 24 100% 5 29
1:00 PM 65% 24 100% 5 29
2:00 PM 70% 26 100% 5 31
3:00 PM 70% 26 100% 5 31
4:00 PM 75% 28 70% 4 32
5:00 PM 80% 30 70% 4 34
6:00 PM 85% 31 40% 2 33
7:00 PM 85% 31 20% 1 32
8:00 PM 90% 33 20% 1 34
9:00 PM 95% 35 20% 1 36
10:00 PM 95% 35 20% 1 36
11:00 PM 100% 37 10% 1 38
12:00 AM 100% 37 5% 0 37
Notes:
[1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020.
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements.
[3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction.

Appendix Table A-4

LEISURE HOTEL
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Appendix Table A-5
OFFICE
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Land Use Office
Size 1.5 KSF
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 3.33 /KSF
Weekday Pkg Rate[3] 3.33 /KSF
Gross Spaces 5 Spaces
Adjusted Gross 1.00 5 Spaces
Spaces[4] 0 Visitor Spc. 5 Emp. Spc. Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0% 0 3% 0 0
7:00 AM 1% 0 15% 1 1
8:00 AM 20% 0 50% 3 3
9:00 AM 60% 0 90% 5 5
10:00 AM 100% 0 100% 5 5
11:00 AM 45% 0 100% 5 5
12:00 PM 15% 0 85% 4 4
1:00 PM 45% 0 85% 4 4
2:00 PM 95% 0 95% 5 5
3:00 PM 45% 0 95% 5 5
4:00 PM 15% 0 85% 4 4
5:00 PM 10% 0 60% 3 3
6:00 PM 5% 0 25% 1 1
7:00 PM 2% 0 15% 1 1
8:00 PM 1% 0 5% 0 0
9:00 PM 0% 0 3% 0 0
10:00 PM 0% 0 1% 0 0
11:00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 0
12:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020.
[3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements.
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction.

Appendix Table A-5
OFFICE
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Land Use Office
Size 1.5 KSF
Peak Pkg Rate[2] 3.33 /KSF
Weekend Pkg Rate[3] 0.33 /KSF
Gross Spaces 1 Spaces
Adjusted Gross 1.00 1 Spaces
Spaces[4] 0 Visitor Spc. 1 Emp. Spc. Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak Spaces Peak Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0
7:00 AM 20% 0 20% 0 0
8:00 AM 60% 0 60% 1 1
9:00 AM 80% 0 80% 1 1
10:00 AM 90% 0 90% 1 1
11:00 AM 100% 0 100% 1 1
12:00 PM 90% 0 90% 1 1
1:00 PM 80% 0 80% 1 1
2:00 PM 60% 0 60% 1 1
3:00 PM 40% 0 40% 0 0
4:00 PM 20% 0 20% 0 0
5:00 PM 10% 0 10% 0 0
6:00 PM 5% 0 5% 0 0
7:00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 0
8:00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 0
9:00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 0
10:00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 0
11:00 PM 0% 0 0% 0 0
12:00 AM 0% 0 0% 0 0
Notes:
[4] Gross spaces not adjusted to reflect parking demand reduction due to captive market, internal capture, transit, and/or walk-in reduction.
[3] The weekday and weekend parking rates are based on the emperical/Code parking ratio and the weekday vs. weekend parking variations as summarized in Figure 2-2 of the "Shared Parking" manual.
[2] Peak parking rates based on the City of Manhattan Beach Local Coastal Program Chapter A Off S ki d di i
[1] Source: "Shared Parking", Third Edition, Urban Land Institute, ICSC, and National Parking Association, 2020.

← All documents from this meeting