Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
for the
Environmental Impact Report
Lumina at Machado Project
City of Manteca, San Joaquin County, California
State Clearinghouse No. 2021010265
Prepared for:
City of Manteca
Community Development Department
1001 West Center Street
Manteca, CA 95337
209.456.8516
Contact: Lea C. Simvoulakis, Planning Manager
Prepared by:
De Novo Planning Group
1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
916.580.9818
Contact: Steve McMurtry, Principal
April 1, 2022
Exhibit "B"
ATTACHMENT 4
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2022
Lumina at Machado Ranch 2
This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Lumina at Machado Ranch (Project). This MMRP has been prepared pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, which requires public agencies to “adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.” A MMRP is required for the proposed Project because the EIR has identified significant adverse impacts, and measures have been identified to mitigate those impacts.
The numbering of the individual mitigation measures follows the numbering sequence as found in the Draft EIR.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The MMRP, as outlined in the following table, describes mitigation timing, monitoring responsibilities, and compliance verification responsibility for all mitigation measures identified in this Final EIR.
The City of Manteca will be the primary agency responsible for implementing the mitigation measures and will continue to monitor mitigation measures that are required to be implemented during the operation of the proposed Project.
The MMRP is presented in tabular form on the following pages. The components of the MMRP are described briefly below:
• Mitigation Measures: The mitigation measures are taken from the Draft EIR in the same order that they appear in that document.
• Mitigation Timing: Identifies at which stage of the project mitigation must be completed. • Monitoring Responsibility: Identifies the agency that is responsible for mitigation monitoring.
• Compliance Verification: This is a space that is available for the monitor to date and initial when the monitoring or mitigation implementation took place.
ATTACHMENT 4
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2022
Lumina at Machado Ranch 3
TABLE 1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES
Impact 3.1-3: Project
implementation may result in light
and glare impacts.
Conditions of Approval will require compliance with the Development Standards for lighting, landscaping, and building design, which would collectively minimize the visual impacts to the greatest extent feasible as the site transitions from agricultural to urban/suburban uses City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
Prior to the
approval of the
improvement
plans.
AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
Impact 3.2-1: The proposed
Project has the potential to result
in the conversion of Farmlands,
including Prime Farmland and
Farmland of Statewide
Importance, as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California
Resources Agency, to nonagricultural uses.
Mitigation Measure 3.2-1: Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the Project applicant shall participate in the City’s agricultural mitigation fee program and the SJMSCP by paying the established fees on a per-acre basis for the loss of important farmland. Fees paid toward the City’s program shall be used to fund conservation easements on comparable or better agricultural lands to provide compensatory mitigation.
City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
San Joaquin
Council of
Governments
Prior to site
disturbance
Impact 3.2-3: The proposed
Project has the potential to result
in conflicts with adjacent
agricultural lands or indirectly
cause conversion of agricultural
lands.
Mitigation Measure 3.2-2: Prior to approval of improvement plans for each phase of the Project, the Project applicant shall demonstrate that the Project site plans include adequate measures to buffer adjacent agricultural uses from urban uses on the Project site and to reduce adverse impacts to neighboring agricultural uses; such measures shall include, but not be limited to:
• The Project shall provide adequate and secure fencing at the interface of the Project site, or any individual phase of the Project, and adjacent agricultural uses. Said fencing shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department.
• The Project shall provide buffers, which may include parking areas, roadways and streets, drainage channels, and landscaped corridors, to buffer adjacent agricultural uses from the Project, including any City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval of
improvement
plans for each
phase of the
Project
ATTACHMENT 4
2022 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
4 Lumina at Machado Ranch
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
individual phase of the Project, from proposed urban uses.
The Project shall provide notifications to all operators of uses on the Project site that are adjacent or in the vicinity of existing agricultural land of the City’s Right-to-Farm Ordinance.
AIR QUALITY
Impact 3.3-1: Project operation
would result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the
Project region is in nonattainment, or conflict or obstruct implementation of the District’s air
quality plan.
Mitigation Measure 3.3-1: Prior to the final discretionary approval of individual phases of development (e.g. the first final map), the Project Proponent shall coordinate with the SJVAPCD to ensure compliance with Rule 9510 for both operational and construction emissions. The intent is that each phase of development would demonstrate that the Project does not exceed the applicable SJVAPCD criteria pollutant thresholds for Project operations or construction. If the SJVAPCD criteria pollutant thresholds is exceeded, the Project applicant shall develop a reasonably feasible off-site mitigation strategy to reduce long-term air quality impacts to below the applicable SJVAPCD thresholds of significance. For example, this may consist of fee payments to the SJVAPCD for their use in funding offsite mitigation strategies.
Each off-site mitigation strategy shall be developed with, and approved by, the SJVAPCD and the City of Manteca. Each off-site mitigation strategy is subject to the review and approval of the Air District and the City of Manteca on a phaseby-phase basis, and is intended to be in addition to offsets that are obtained through any on-site mitigation measures. The City of Manteca is required to verify each offsite mitigation strategy and its associated reductions to ensure that the associated air quality impacts are reduced to the maximum extent feasible (i.e. to below the applicable SJVAPCD thresholds of significance, at minimum).
San Joaquin
Valley Air
Pollution
Control District
Prior to
approval of
improvement
plans
Impact 3.3-2: Proposed Project
construction activities would not
result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the
Project region is in nonattainment, or conflict or obstruct Mitigation Measure 3.3-2: Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit for each phase of the Project, the Project Proponent shall prepare and submit a Dust Control Plan that meets all of the applicable requirements of APCD Rule 8021, Section 6.3, for the review and approval of the APCD Air Pollution Control Officer.
Mitigation Measure 3.3-3: During all construction activities, the Project Proponent shall implement dust control measures, as required by APCD Rules SJVAPCD Air
Pollution
Control Officer,
and City of
Manteca
Community
Development
Prior to the
commencement of
construction
activities
ATTACHMENT 4
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2022
Lumina at Machado Ranch 5
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
implementation of the District’s air
quality plan.
8011-8081, to limit Visible Dust Emissions to 20% opacity or less. Dust control measures shall include application of water or chemical dust suppressants to unpaved roads and graded areas, covering or stabilization of transported bulk materials, prevention of carryout or trackout of soil materials to public roads, limiting the area subject to soil disturbance, construction of wind barriers, access restrictions to inactive sites as required by the applicable rules.
Mitigation Measure 3.3-4: During all construction activities, the Project proponent shall implement the following dust control practices identified in Tables 6-2 and 6-3 of the GAMAQI (2002).
a. All disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively utilized for construction purposes, shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water, chemical
stabilizer/suppressant, or vegetative ground cover.
b. All on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.
c. All land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land leveling, grading, cut and fill, and demolition activities shall control fugitive dust emissions by application of water or by presoaking. d. When materials are transported off-site, all material shall be covered, effectively wetted to limit visible dust emissions, or at least six inches of freeboard space from the top of the container shall be maintained.
Department
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Impact 3.4-3: The proposed
Project has the potential to have
direct or indirect effects on
special-status bird species.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1: Prior to commencement of any grading activities, the Project proponent shall seek coverage under the SJMSCP to mitigate for habitat impacts to covered special status species. Coverage involves compensation for habitat impacts on covered species through implementation of incidental take and minimization Measures (ITMMs) and payment of fees for conversion of lands that may provide habitat for covered special status species.
City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
San Joaquin
Prior to any
ground
disturbance
ATTACHMENT 4
2022 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
6 Lumina at Machado Ranch
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
These fees are used to preserve and/or create habitat in preserves to be managed in perpetuity. Obtaining coverage for a Project includes incidental take authorization (permits) under the Endangered Species Act Section 10(a), California Fish and Game Code Section 2081, and the MBTA. Coverage under the SJMSCP would fully mitigate all habitat impacts on covered special-status species.
Council of
Governments
CULTURAL AND TRIBAL RESOURCES
Impact 3.5-1: Project
implementation has the potential
to cause a substantial adverse
change to a significant historical or
archaeological resource, as
defined in CEQA Guidelines
§15064.5
Mitigation Measure 3.5-1: Prior to the initiation of construction activities, a training session for all workers shall be conducted at the site by a qualified archeologist. The training session will provide information on recognition of artifacts, human remains, and cultural deposits to help in the recognition of potential issues.
Mitigation Measure 3.5-2: In concurrence with initial grading, a qualified archeologist shall be present to observe the initial land disturbance, and be able to halt work in the immediate vicinity should artifacts, exotic rock, shell or bone are uncovered during the construction. The monitor will document the finding, and determine if additional work is necessary to excavate or remove the artifacts or feature.
Mitigation Measure 3.5-3: If any historical resources, cultural resources, including prehistoric or historic artifacts, or other indications of archaeological or paleontological resources, are found during grading and construction activities during any phase of the Project, all work shall be halted immediately within a 200-foot radius of the discovery until an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards in prehistoric or historical archaeology, as appropriate, has evaluated the find(s).
Work shall not continue at the discovery site until the archaeologist conducts sufficient research and data collection to make a determination that the resource is either 1) not cultural in origin; or 2) not potentially significant or eligible for listing on the NRHP or CRHR; or 3) not a significant Public Trust Resource.
If Native American resources are identified, a Native American monitor, following the Guidelines for Monitors/Consultants of Native American City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
Qualified
archaeologist
If any cultural
resources,
including
prehistoric or
historic
artifacts, or
other
indications of
archaeological
resources are
found during
grading and
construction
activities
ATTACHMENT 4
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2022
Lumina at Machado Ranch 7
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
Cultural, Religious, and Burial Sites established by the Native American Heritage Commission, may also be required and, if required, shall be retained at the Project applicant’s expense.
Impact 3.5-3: Project
implementation has the potential
to disturb human remains,
including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries.
Mitigation Measure 3.5-4: If human remains are discovered during the course of construction during any phase of the Project, work shall be halted at the site and at any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the San Joaquin County Coroner has been informed and has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the remains are of Native American origin, either of the following steps will be taken:
• The coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission in order to ascertain the proper descendants from the deceased individual. The coroner shall make a recommendation to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods, which may include obtaining a qualified archaeologist or team of archaeologists to properly excavate the human remains.
• The landowner shall retain a Native American monitor, and an archaeologist, if recommended by the Native American monitor, and rebury the Native American human remains and any associated grave goods, with appropriate dignity, on the property and in a location that is not subject to further subsurface disturbance when any of the following conditions occurs:
o The Native American Heritage Commission is unable to
identify a descendent.
o The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation.
The City of Manteca or its authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and the mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner.
City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
Qualified
archaeologist
If any cultural
resources,
including
prehistoric or
historic
artifacts, or
other
indications of
archaeological
resources are
found during
grading and
construction
activities
ATTACHMENT 4
2022 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
8 Lumina at Machado Ranch
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Impact 3.6-1: The proposed
Project may directly or indirectly
cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
rupture of a known earthquake
fault, strong seismic ground
shaking, seismic related ground
failure, or landslides.
Mitigation Measure 3.6-1: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, a certified geotechnical engineer, or equivalent, shall be retained to perform a final geotechnical evaluation of the soils at a design-level as required by the requirements of the California Building Code Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 18, Section 1803.1.1.2 related to expansive soils and other soil conditions. The evaluation shall be prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements outlined in California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 16, Chapter 17, and Chapter 18, which addresses structural design, tests and inspections, and soils and foundation standards. The final geotechnical evaluation shall include design recommendations to ensure that soil conditions do not pose a threat to the health and safety of people or structures, including threats from liquefaction or lateral spreading. The grading and improvement plans, as well as the storm drainage and building plans for each phase of the Project shall be designed in accordance with the recommendations provided in the final geotechnical evaluation.
City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
Regional Water
Quality Control
Board
Prior to clearing,
grading, and
disturbances to
the ground such
as stockpiling, or
excavation
Impact 3.6-6: The proposed
Project has the potential to
directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature
Mitigation Measure 3.6-2: If any paleontological resources are found during grading and construction activities of the Project, all work shall be halted immediately within a 200-foot radius of the discovery until a qualified paleontologist has evaluated the find.
Work shall not continue at the discovery site until the paleontologist evaluates the find and makes a determination regarding the significance of the resource and identifies recommendations for conservation of the resource, including preserving in place or relocating on the Project site, if feasible, or collecting the resource to the extent feasible and documenting the find with the University of California Museum of Paleontology.
City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
Certified
geotechnical
engineer
Prior to
earthmoving
activities
GREENHOUSE GASES AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Impact 3.7-1: Project
implementation would generate
greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may
Mitigation Measure 3.7-1: Prior to the approval of individual phases of development (i.e. final maps, improvement plans, site plan review, etc.), the Project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the SJVAPCD to ensure that the Project would not exceed the applicable SJVAPCD greenhouse gas thresholds City of Manteca
Community
Development
During
construction,
operation, and
maintenance /
ATTACHMENT 4
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2022
Lumina at Machado Ranch 9
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
have a significant impact on the
environment to conflict with an
applicable plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions
of greenhouse gases.
for Project construction and operations. The intent is that each phase of development would demonstrate that the Project does not exceed the applicable SJVAPCD greenhouse gas pollutant thresholds for project operations or construction. If the SJVAPCD greenhouse gas pollutant thresholds are exceeded, the project applicant shall develop a reasonably feasible off-site mitigation strategy to reduce long-term air quality impacts to below the applicable SJVAPCD thresholds of significance. For example, this may consistent of fee payments to the SJVAPCD for their use in funding offsite mitigation strategies. Each off-site mitigation strategy shall be developed with, and approved by, the SJVAPCD and the City of Manteca. Each off-site mitigation strategy is subject to the review and approval of the Air District and the City of Manteca on a phase-by-phase basis, and is intended to be in addition to offsets that are obtained through any on-site mitigation measures.
The City of Manteca is required to verify each offsite mitigation strategy and its associated reductions to ensure that the associated greenhouse gas impacts are reduced to the maximum extent feasible (i.e. to below the applicable SJVAPCD thresholds of significance, at minimum). Examples of off-site mitigation strategies may include (but are not limited to) transportation demand management (TDM) measures and/or financial incentives for project employees to utilize alternative transportation options such as buses, bicycles, or electric vehicles. Measures may be designed in tandem with the mitigation requirements incorporated into Mitigation Measure 3.3-1 (see Section 3.3: Air Quality for further detail).
Department landscaping
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Impact 3.8-1: Potential to create a
significant hazard through the
routine transport, use, or disposal
of hazardous materials or through
the reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving
the release of hazardous materials
into the environment.
Mitigation Measure 3.8-1: Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, a Soils Management Plan (SMP) shall be submitted and approved by the San Joaquin County Department of Environmental Health. The SMP shall establish management practices for handling hazardous materials, including fuels, paints, cleaners, solvents, etc., during construction. The approved SMP shall be posted and maintained onsite during construction activities and all construction personnel shall acknowledge that they have reviewed and understand the plan.
Mitigation Measure 3.8-2: Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall hire a licensed well contractor to obtain a well abandonment San Joaquin
County
Department of
Environmental
Health
City of Manteca
Community
Development
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
ATTACHMENT 4
2022 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
10 Lumina at Machado Ranch
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
permit from San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department, and properly abandon the on-site wells, pursuant to review and approval of the City Engineer and the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department.
Mitigation Measure 3.8-3: The applicant shall hire a qualified consultant to perform additional testing prior to the issuance of grading permits or demolition permits for construction activities in the following areas that have been deemed to have potentially hazardous conditions present:
• The residential units and adjoining structures.
• The soils in the area where farming equipment and above ground tanks have been used.
The intent of the additional testing is to investigate whether any of the buildings, facilities, or soils contain hazardous materials. If asbestos-containing materials and/or lead are found in the buildings, a Cal-OSHA certified ACBM and lead based paint contractor shall be retained to remove the asbestoscontaining materials and lead in accordance with EPA and California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) standards. In addition, all activities (construction or demolition) in the vicinity of these materials shall comply with Cal/OSHA asbestos and lead worker construction standards. The ACBM and lead shall be disposed of properly at an appropriate offsite disposal facility. If surface staining is found on the Project site, a hazardous waste specialist shall be engaged to further assess the stained area.
Mitigation Measure 3.8-4: Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, evenly distributed soil samples shall be conducted throughout the proposed Project for analysis of pesticides and heavy metals. The samples shall be submitted for laboratory analysis of pesticides and heavy metals per DTSC and EPA protocols.
The results of the soil sampling shall be submitted to the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department. If elevated levels of pesticides or heavy metals are detected during the laboratory analysis of the soils, a soil cleanup and remediation plan shall be prepared and implemented prior to the commencement of grading activities.
Department
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
ATTACHMENT 4
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2022
Lumina at Machado Ranch 11
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
Impact 3.9-1: The proposed
Project has the potential to violate
water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements during
construction.
Mitigation Measure 3.9-1: Prior to clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground such as stockpiling, or excavation for each phase of the Project, the Project proponent shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the RWQCB to obtain coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ amended by 2010-0014-DWQ & 2012-0006-DWQ). The SWPPP shall be designed with Best Management Practices (BMPs) that the RWQCB has deemed as effective at reducing erosion, controlling sediment, and managing runoff. These include: covering disturbed areas with mulch, temporary seeding, soil stabilizers, binders, fiber rolls or blankets, temporary vegetation, and permanent seeding. Sediment control BMPs, installing silt fences or placing straw wattles below slopes, installing berms and other temporary runon and runoff diversions. These BMPs are only examples of what should be considered and should not preclude new or innovative approaches currently available or being developed. Final selection of BMPs will be subject to approval by City of Manteca and the RWQCB. The SWPPP will be kept on site during construction activity and will be made available upon request to representatives of the RWQCB.
City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit
Impact 3.9-2: The proposed
Project has the potential to violate
water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements during
operation.
Mitigation Measure 3.9-2: The Project applicant shall implement the following nonstructural BMPs that focus on preventing pollutants from entering stormwater:
• Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping
o Prior to clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground such as stockpiling, or excavation in each phase of the Project, the Project proponent shall develop a spill response and prevention plan as a component of (1) SWPPPs
prepared for construction activities, (2) SWPPPs for
facilities subject to the NPDES Stormwater Permit, and (3) spill prevention control and countermeasure plans for
qualifying facilities. The spill response and prevention plan shall be implemented during all construction activities.
City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
Regional Water
Quality Control
Board
Prior to
approval of
improvement
plans
ATTACHMENT 4
2022 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
12 Lumina at Machado Ranch
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
o Streets and parking lots in all non-residential portions, including the right-of-way, of the Project site shall be swept at least once every two weeks.
• Operation and Maintenance (O&M) of Treatment Controls o Prior to clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground such as stockpiling, or excavation in each phase of the Project, the Project proponent shall develop an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for the storm drainage
facilities to ensure long-term performance. The O&M plan shall incorporate the manufacturers’ recommended
maintenance procedures and include (1) provisions for
debris removal, (2) guidance for addressing public health or safety issues, and (3) methods and criteria for assessing the efficacy of the storm drainage system. An annual report shall be submitted to the City certifying that maintenance of the facilities was conducted according to the O&M plan.
Mitigation Measure 3.9-3: The Project applicant shall implement the following structural BMPs that focus on preventing pollutants from entering stormwater, or alternative BMPs approved by the City of Manteca. Implementation of BMPs apply to all non-residential parcels, including the right-of-way, as appropriate. • Extended Detention Facilities: Extended detention refers to the facilities proposed for the Project site that would detain and temporarily store stormwater runoff to reduce the peak rates of discharge to the storm drainage system. Detention of stormwater allows particles and other pollutants to settle and thereby potentially reduce concentrations and mass loading of contaminants in the discharge.
• Grassed Swales: A swale is a vegetated, open channel management practice designed to treat and attenuate stormwater runoff for a specified water quality volume. Stormwater runoff flowing through these channels is treated by being filtered through vegetation in the ATTACHMENT 4
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2022
Lumina at Machado Ranch 13
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
channel, through a subsoil matrix, and/or through infiltration into the underlying soils. Swales can be used throughout the proposed Project area where feasible in the landscape design to treat parking lot runoff.
Proprietary Devices: There are a variety of commercially available stormwater treatment devices designed to remove contaminants from drainage once flows enter the conveyance systems. StormFilter™ units, or equivalent filtration-type systems, and Bioswales are recommended for streets and parking areas. Drop inlet filters should also be used to control drainage runoff water quality.
Impact 3.9-6 Place housing or
structures that would
impede/redirect flows within a
100-year, or 200-year flood hazard
area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood
hazard delineation map.
Mitigation Measure 3.9-3: The Project site is located within the City of Manteca’s F-200 zone, which makes it at risk from the 200-year flood. As such, the Project is subject to the Manteca Municipal Code Section 17.30.040 Subsection C which places construction limitations on development proposed in areas that are at risk of flooding under the 200-year storm. The Project applicant shall pay the adopted SB5 fee to go toward SJAFCA’s effort to provide urban level of flood protection for the Project site and region. In addition, the Project shall remain consistent with the finding of adequate progress by SJAFCA (the “local flood management agency”) on an annual basis.
City of Manteca
Community
Development
Department
SJAFCA
Prior to
approval of
improvement
plans
NOISE
Impact 3.11-1: The proposed
Project may generate a substantial
temporary or permanent increase
in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other
agencies.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-1A: Construction activities shall adhere to the requirements of the City of Manteca Municipal Code with respect to hours of operation. This requirement shall be noted in the improvements plans prior to approval by the City’s Public Works Department.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-1B: All equipment shall be fitted with factory equipped mufflers, and in good working order. This requirement shall be noted in the improvements plans prior to approval by the City’s Public Works Department.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-2: An 8-foot tall sound wall shall be constructed along the Woodward Avenue and South Airport Way frontages, adjacent to proposed Development Area residential uses, in order to achieve the City’s City of Manteca
Public Works
Department
Prior to
approval of
improvements
plans
ATTACHMENT 4
2022 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
14 Lumina at Machado Ranch
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
exterior noise standards. Noise barrier walls shall be constructed of concrete panels, concrete masonry units, earthen berms, or any combination of these materials that achieve the required total height. These requirements shall be included in the improvements plans prior to their approval by the City’s Public Works Department. Figure 3.11-2 shows the recommended sound wall locations.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-3: For the first rows of lots on the Development Area site adjacent to the Woodward Avenue or South Airport Way right of way, second floor exterior facades with a view of Woodward Avenue or South Airport Way would need the following noise control measures:
Windows shall have a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 32. • Interior gypsum at exterior walls shall be
5/8”;
• Ceiling gypsum shall be 5/8”;
• Exterior finish shall be stucco, fiber cement
lap siding, or system with equivalent weight per square foot; • Mechanical ventilation shall be installed in all
residential uses to allow residents to keep doors and windows closed, as desired for acoustical isolation.
• As an alternative to the above-listed interior
noise control measures, the applicant may provide a detailed analysis of interior noise control measures once building plans become available. The analysis should be prepared by a qualified noise control engineer and shall outline the specific measures required to meet the City of Manteca 45 dB Ldn interior noise level standard.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-4: To reduce traffic noise increases to less than +1.5 dB, the following roadway segments shall be paved with quiet pavement:
• Airport Way from Atherton to Woodward Avenue (Includes NonDevelopment Area 2) • Airport Way South of Woodward Avenue
• Woodward Avenue west of Airport Way (includes Non-Development ATTACHMENT 4
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2022
Lumina at Machado Ranch 15
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
Area 1)
The pavement would be required for any portion of roadway passing a noisesensitive use not protected by an existing sound wall, and for a distance of 100 feet on either side of the sensitive-use. This requirement shall be noted on the Project improvement plans. Approximate pavement locations are shown on Figure 3.11-3.
Impact 3.11-2: The proposed
Project would not generate
excessive groundborne vibration
or groundborne noise levels.
Mitigation Measure 3.11-4: Any compaction required less than twenty-six (26) feet from the adjacent residential structures shall be accomplished by using static drum rollers which use weight instead of vibrations to achieve soil compaction. As an alternative to this requirement, pre-construction crack documentation and construction vibration monitoring could be conducted to ensure that construction vibrations do not cause damage to any adjacent structures.
City of Manteca
Public Works
Department
Prior to
approval of
improvements
plans
TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
Impact 3.13-2: Project
implementation may conflict with
a program, plan, policy or
ordinance addressing the
circulation system, including
transit, bicycle, and pedestrian
facilities.
Conditions of Approval have been incorporated to ensure that the project does not conflict with policy and/or ordinances relating to the circulation system. • Traffic COA #1 - The developer shall install a traffic signal at Airport Way/W Atherton Drive prior to issuance of the 193rd building permit, unless an alternative installation plan is agreed to by the Director of Public Works or City Engineer. The design of the traffic signal and associated intersection improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works or City Engineer. The developer shall pay for the total cost for the design and installation of the traffic signal but will be reimbursed by the City of Manteca for the cost less their fair share. The project contributes to approximately 12 percent of volumes at this intersection; therefore, the project’s fair share would be 12 percent.
• Traffic COA #2 - The developer shall install a traffic signal at Airport Way/Woodward Avenue prior to issuance of the 432nd building permit, unless an alternative installation plan is agreed to by the Director of Public Works or City Engineer. The design of the traffic City of Manteca
Public Works
Department
Prior to issuance
of building
permits for each
phase of the
Project
ATTACHMENT 4
2022 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
16 Lumina at Machado Ranch
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
signal and associated intersection improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works or City Engineer. The developer shall pay for the total cost for the design and installation of the traffic signal but will be reimbursed by the City of Manteca for the cost less their fair share. The project contributes to approximately 22 percent of volumes at this intersection; therefore, the project’s fair share would be 22 percent.
• Traffic COA #3 – Woodward Avenue/Bella Terra Drive shall be constructed as a roundabout concurrent with the first phase of development. The developer shall be fully responsible for this improvement.
Traffic COA #4 – The developer shall pay their fair share for improvements identified in the PFIP at the Airport Way/Daniels Street and Woodward Avenue/McKinley Avenue intersections. The project’s fair share at Airport Way/Daniels Street would be three percent (3%) and the project’s fair share at Woodward Avenue/McKinley Avenue would be six percent (6%). This condition will be satisfied when the developer pays the PFIP fee, which is collected upon issuance of each home’s building permit
UTILITIES
Impact 3.14-5: The proposed
Project has the potential to
require or result in the
construction of new stormwater
drainage facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects.
Mitigation Measure 3.14-1: Prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit, the Project applicant shall submit a drainage plan to the City of Manteca for review and approval. The plan shall include an engineered storm drainage plan that demonstrates attainment of pre-Project runoff requirements prior to release at the outlet canal and describes the volume reduction measures and treatment controls used to reach attainment consistent with the Manteca Storm Drain Master Plan.
City of Manteca
Public Works
Department
Prior to issuance
of building
permits for each
phase of the
Project
Impact 3.14-6: The proposed
Project has the potential to be
served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to
accommodate the Project’s solid
Mitigation Measure 3.14-2: Prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit for each phase of the Project, the Project applicant shall pay the City’s waste connection fee which equates to the Project’s fair share contribution, consistent with section 13.02.050, Charges for solid waste collection services, City of Manteca
Public Works
Department
Prior to issuance
of building
permits for each
phase of the
ATTACHMENT 4
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2022
Lumina at Machado Ranch 17
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE
MONITORING
RESPONSIBILITY
TIMING
VERIFICATION
(DATE/INITIALS)
waste disposal needs and comply
with federal, State, and local
statutes and regulations related to
solid waste.
of the City’s municipal code. Project
ATTACHMENT 4
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2022
Lumina at Machado Ranch 18
This page left intentionally blank.
ATTACHMENT 4