Attachment 2 - Contract — Manteca City Council, June 21, 2022

1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into this ____ day of ________________, 2022, by and between the CITY OF MANTECA, a public body, corporate and politic ("City") and BPR CONSULTING GROUP, a California corporation ("Consultant").

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform the professional services required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification, and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions specified herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render the professional services set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the building safety, plan check, and inspection services described in the attached Attachment 1 that is incorporated by this reference, and pursuant to the Proposal submitted by Consultant dated April 27, 2022 and attached hereto as Attachment 2. Consultant shall provide these services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Attachment 1, subject to the direction of the City through its staff that may be provided from time to time. Performance of the building safety, plan check and inspection services is sometimes referred to herein as “the Project.”

2. Work Through City Staff. Consultant shall perform its services pursuant to this Agreement solely through City staff. No communications, information or documentations shall be made directly to any applicant to the City without the prior written consent of the City. This shall not apply to the sole request of information or clarification of information by Consultant from the applicant. All requests shall be noted to City in an expeditious manner.

3. Time of Performance. Consultant’s services will commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall be completed in accordance with the Schedule of Activities, attached hereto as Attachment 3. All work shall be completed no later than June 30, 2025. Failure to submit work products in accordance with the Schedule of Activities may result in the City withholding progress payments. Repeated failure to complete work products in accordance with the Schedule of Activities may result in a reduction of the total compensation provided for in Section 4 herein.

4. Compensation. Without additional authorization from the City, compensation to be paid to Consultant shall not exceed TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($250,000.00). Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any defects, even if those defects were known to the City at the time of payment. No work shall occur more than the contracted amount without prior written approval by the City of Manteca.

ATTACHMENT 2
2 5. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City specifying and describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours expended and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. Full payment of each task will only be made at such time as each task is completed.

City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff. Payments may be delayed by City if Consultant fails to provide services in accordance with the Schedule of Activities, unless the City has provided prior written consent to any delay in the schedule.

6. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, the term "Extra Work" means any work that is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the time of execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without the City’s prior written authorization.

7. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately for cause, or by either party without cause upon 15 days’ prior written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination upon submittal of an invoice for same.

8. Ownership of Documents; Confidentiality.

A. All plans, studies, documents, and other writings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notes and internal documents, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work. City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request by City. Consultant shall not be responsible for any unauthorized modification or use of such information for other than its intended purpose.

B. All memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other documents and data, either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement, shall be held confidential by Consultant. These materials shall not, without the City’s prior written consent, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the services under this Agreement. Nor shall these materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant that is otherwise known to Consultant, or is generally known, or has become known to the related profession shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs relating to the Project for which Consultant's services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant's services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production, or other similar medium without the City’s prior written consent.

ATTACHMENT 2
3 9. Consultant's Books and Records.

A. Consultant shall maintain all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City, for a minimum period of three years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.

B. Consultant shall maintain all records that document performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement.

C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor, or a designated representative of any of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City Hall when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant's address specified in Section 16 of this Agreement.

D. Where City has reason to believe that records or documents may be lost or discarded due to the dissolution or termination of Consultant's business, City may, by written request, require that custody of the records be given to the City and that the records and documents be maintained in City Hall. Access to these records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant's representatives, or Consultant's successor-ininterest.

10. Independent Contractor. In the performance of the work and services required by this Agreement, Consultant shall act as and be an independent contractor and not an agent, or employee of the City. Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement or other benefits that accrue to City's employees, and Consultant expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights.

11. Interest of Consultant.

A. Consultant represents that neither it nor any employee has any investment or interest in real property, and shall not acquire any such interest, direct or indirect, within the area covered by this Agreement, or any other source of income, interest in real property, or investment that would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's services hereunder. Consultant further represents that, in the performance of its duties hereunder, no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

B. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
(1) will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to its rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City, or of any City official, other than normal Agreement monitoring; and
ATTACHMENT 2
4 (2) possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond the rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).)

12. Professional Ability of Consultant.

A. City is relying upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement.

Consultant shall therefore provide skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise.

B. The primary provider of the services required by this Agreement shall be BPR Consulting Group and its employees. A list of other individuals assigned to the Project will be provided to City for its review and approval, and these individuals shall not be replaced without the City’s prior written consent.

13. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the customary standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, codes, ordinances, and regulations.

14. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals that are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance, and approvals that are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession.

15. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages, injuries, and liability, direct or indirect (including any and all costs and expenses in connection therewith), arising out of Consultant’s performance of this Agreement, or Consultant’s failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement; excluding, however, any claim arising out of the active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees, or volunteers.

16. Insurance Requirements.

A. Job specific insurance requirements can be found on the attached Attachment

4. Other insurance provisions can be found below:

B. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with language substantially as follows:
(1) The City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with ATTACHMENT 2
5 respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work.
(2) The policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it. (3) The insurance shall apply to each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. (4) The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, and agents. (5) Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. (6) The insurance provided by the policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days written notice has been received by the City.
(7) The City will not accept any endorsements that were issued in 2004. Acceptable endorsement forms are CG 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10 10 01 and CG 20 37 10 01.

C. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of those deductibles or self-insured retentions.

D. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide to City certificates of insurance with original endorsements as evidence of the required insurance coverage.

Certificates of insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement.

17. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of Manteca
1001 W. Center Street
Manteca, CA 95337
Attention: Brad Wungluck
ATTACHMENT 2
6 If to Consultant: BPR Consulting Group
2201 Francisco Drive, Suite 140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Attention: Ron Beehler, SE

18. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between the City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in their entirety by this Agreement.

19. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

20. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience, and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties, or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of the City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor.

Nothing in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of the City to pay any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as may be required by law.

21. Waiver. Waiver of any breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach or default of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

22. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

23. Controlling Law; Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, and any legal action relating to this Agreement shall take place in the Superior Court, County of San Joaquin.

24. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees.

25. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and shall divide the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS/ENDISPUTE ("JAMS") or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five ATTACHMENT 2
7 mediators selected by JAMS, and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation.

26. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy has been signed by both parties.

27. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant warrants that it has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform this Agreement. Each party warrants to the other that the signatories to this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to enter into this Agreement and to bind each party.

28. Prohibited Interests.

A. Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement.

Further, Consultant warrants that it has neither paid nor agreed to pay any person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability.

B. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer, or employee of City, during the period of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

29. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer, and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex, or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination.

30. Precedence. In case of conflict between Consultant’s Proposal/Consultant’s attachments and the City’s Agreement/City’s attachments, the City’s Agreement and City’s attachments shall take precedence over Consultant’s proposal/Consultant’s attachments.

This Space Purposely Left Blank
ATTACHMENT 2
8 TO EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT, each of the parties has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized representative as of the date set forth in the introductory paragraph on page 1 above.

CITY OF MANTECA: CONSULTANT:

_________________________________ BPR Consulting Group
Toni Lundgren
Interim City Manager
ATTEST: By: ___________________________________
(Signature)
_________________________________ Ron Beehler, SE
Cassandra Candini-Tilton, Principal-in-Charge
Director of Legislative Services

COUNTERSIGNED: By: ___________________________________
(Signature)

_________________________________ Bill Rodgers, SE
Bret Harmon, Prinipal/Project Manager
Director of Finance

COUNTERSIGNED: Address: BPR Consulting Group
2201 Francisco Drive
Suite 140-658
_________________________________ El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Dawn Cortesi,
Acting Director of Human Resources Telephone: 916-562-3600 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
L. David Nefouse,
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT 2
Building Safety Division
Development Services Department
Request for Proposal (RFP)
for Professional Services
City of Manteca Building Safety – Plan Check and Inspection Services
RFP Issued Wednesday, April 6, 2022
RFP submittal deadline: 12:00pm, Wednesday, April 27, 2022 Contact: Brad Wungluck, Chief Building Official
(Email address) [email protected]

CITY OF MANTECA
1215 W. Center Street, Suite 201
Manteca, CA 95337
(209) 456-8550
Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TITLE: PLAN REVIEW AND BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES

1. Introduction:

The City of Manteca Building Safety Division is responsible for plan review and inspections of commercial and residential construction projects within the City of Manteca. Due to fluctuating workloads and limited staffing, it is necessary at times to employ third party agency services on some projects to maintain reasonable response times. With the improvement in the economy, and several projects planned for the near future, third party services will be necessary to avoid a reduction in service to the community as workload increases. Responsive bids must be received by Wednesday, April 27, 2022.

2. ATTACHMENTS
The attachments below are included with this Request for Proposals (RFP) for your review and submittal (see asterisk):

Attachment A – Proposer’s Information Form*
Attachment B – Scope of Work/Services
Attachment C – Sample Agreement for Professional Services Attachment D – Insurance Requirements
The items identified with an asterisk (*) shall be filled out, signed by the appropriate representative of the company and returned with submittal.

3. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

3.1 Examination of Proposal Documents
The submission of a proposal shall be deemed a representation and certification by the Proposer that they:

3.1.1 Have carefully read and fully understand the information that was provided by the City to serve as the basis for submission of this proposal.

3.1.2 Have the capability to successfully undertake and complete the responsibilities and obligations of the proposal being submitted.

3.1.3 Represent that all information contained in the proposal is true and correct.

3.1.4 Did not, in any way, collude, conspire to agree, directly or indirectly, with any person, firm, corporation or other Proposer in regard to the amount, terms or conditions of this proposal.

3.1.5 Acknowledge that the City has the right to make any inquiry it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information supplied by Proposer, and Proposer hereby grants the City permission to make these inquiries, and to provide any and all related documentation in a timely manner.

No request for modification of the proposal shall be considered after its submission on grounds that Proposer was not fully informed to any fact or condition.

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

3.2 Addenda/Clarifications
Should discrepancies or omissions be found in this RFP or should there be a need to clarify this RFP, questions or comments regarding this RFP must be put in writing and received by the City no later than 1:00 p.m., Wednesday, April 20, 2022. Correspondence shall be emailed to [email protected]. Responses from the City will be communicated in writing, via email, to all recipients of this RFP. Inquiries received after the date and time stated will not be accepted and will be returned to senders without response. All addenda shall become a part of this RFP and shall be acknowledged on the Proposer’s Form. The City shall not be responsible for nor be bound by any oral instructions, interpretations or explanations issued by the City or its representatives.

3.3 Submission of Proposals
All proposals shall be submitted to:

City of Manteca
Building Safety Division
Attn: Brad Wungluck
1215 W Center Street, Suite 201
Manteca, CA 95337
Proposals must be delivered no later than 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 27, 2022. All proposals received after that time will be returned to the Proposer unopened.

The Proposer shall submit three (3) hard copies of its proposal in a sealed envelope, labeled “Original”, addressed as noted above, bearing the Proposer’s name and address clearly marked, “RFP FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: CITY OF MANTECA PLAN REVIEW AND BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES.”

3.4 Withdrawal of Proposals
A Proposer may withdraw its proposal at any time before the expiration of the time for submission of proposals as provided in the RFP by delivering a written request for withdrawal signed by, or on behalf of, the Proposer.

3.5 Rights of the City of Manteca
This RFP does not commit the City to enter into a contract, nor does it obligate the City to pay for any costs incurred in preparation and submission of proposals or in anticipation of a contract. The City reserves the right to:
• Make the selection based on its sole discretion;
• Reject any and all proposals;
• Issue subsequent Requests for Proposals;
• Postpone opening for its own convenience;
• Remedy technical errors in the Request for Proposals process; • Approve or disapprove the use of particular sub consultants; • Negotiate with any, all or none of the Proposers;
Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
• Accept other than the lowest offer;
• Waive informalities and irregularities in the Proposals and/or • Enter into an agreement with another Proposer in the event the originally selected Proposer defaults or fails to execute an agreement with the City.

An agreement shall not be binding or valid with the City unless and until it is executed by authorized representatives of the City and of the Proposer.

4. PROPOSED TENTATIVE TIMELINE
The tentative RFP timeline is as follows:

RFP Issued Wednesday, April 6, 2022
Deadline for questions, clarifications 1:00 p.m., Wednesday, April 20, 2022 Proposals Due 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, April 27, 2022
Consultant selection and contract preparation begins week of May 2nd, 2022 City Council Presentation and Contract award May/June 2022 Work commences July 1, 2022

5. INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED (to be submitted in this order only) These instructions outline the guidelines governing the format and content of the proposal and the approach to be used in its development and presentation. The intent of the RFP is to encourage responses that clearly communicate the Proposer’s understanding of the City’s requirements and its approach to successfully provide the products and/or services on time and within budget.

Only that information which is essential to an understanding and evaluation of the proposal should be submitted. Items not specifically and explicitly related to the RFP and proposal, e.g. brochures, marketing material, etc. will not be considered in the evaluation.

All proposals shall address the following items in the order listed below and shall be numbered 1 through 5 in the proposal document.

5.1 Chapter 1 – Proposal Summary
This Chapter shall discuss the highlights, key features and distinguishing points of the Proposal. A separate sheet shall include a list of individuals and contacts for this Proposal and how to communicate with them. Limit this Chapter to a total of three (3) pages including the separate sheet.

5.2 Chapter 2 – Profile on the Proposing Firm(s)
This Chapter shall include a brief description of the Prime Proposer’s firm size as well as the proposed local organization structure. Include a discussion of the Prime Proposer firm’s financial stability, capacity and resources. Include all other firms participating in the Proposal, including similar information about the firms.

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Additionally, this section shall include a listing of any lawsuit or litigation and the result of that action resulting from (a) any public project undertaken by the Proposer or by its subcontractors where litigation is still pending or has occurred within the last five years or (b) any type of project where claims or settlements were paid by the consultant or its insurers within the last five years.

5.3 Chapter 3 – Qualifications of the Firm
This Chapter shall include a brief description of the Proposer’s and sub-Proposer’s qualifications and previous experience on similar or related projects. Provide descriptions of pertinent project experience with other public municipalities that includes a summary of the work performed, the total project cost, the percentage of work the firm was responsible for, the period over which the work was completed, and the name, title, and phone number of clients to be contacted for references. Give a brief statement of the firm’s adherence to the schedule and budget for the project. Please include sample resumes and qualifications and a complete project matrix.

This chapter shall include information regarding any relationships with firms and/or individuals who may submit proposals in response to the RFPs being developed.

5.4 Chapter 4 – Proposal Exceptions
This Chapter shall discuss any exceptions or requested changes that Proposer has to the City’s RFP conditions, requirements and sample contract. If there are no exceptions noted, it is assumed the Proposer will accept all conditions and requirements identified in the Attachment C – “Sample Agreement for Services.” Items not excepted will not be open to later negotiation.

5.5 Chapter 5 – Proposal Costs Sheet and Rates
The fee information is relevant to a determination of whether the fee is fair and reasonable in light of the services to be provided. Provision of this information assists the City in determining the firm’s understanding of the project, and provides staff with tools to negotiate the cost, provide in a table.

Please clearly specify the rate for the following:

Plan Review:
• Complete Plan Review
• MEP, Energy and Green Review
• Structural Review (hourly)
• Non-Structural Review (hourly)
• Per Streamlined Residential Solar Review
Building Inspection Services
• Building Inspector I
• Building Inspector II
• Senior Building Inspector
• Deputy Building Official
Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
• CASp Inspector
• Permit Technician
• Overtime (hourly)
PLEASE NOTE: The City of Manteca does not pay for services before it receives them.

Therefore, do not propose contract terms that call for upfront payments or deposits.

6. CONTRACT TYPE AND METHOD OF PAYMENT
A Sample Agreement of Services is provided as Attachment C. Proposers shall be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of the Agreement, including Insurance Requirements in Attachment D. If a Proposer desires to take exception to the Agreement, Proposer shall provide the following information in Chapter 7 of their submittal package. Please include the following:
• Proposer shall clearly identify each proposed change to the Agreement, including all relevant Attachments.
• Proposer shall furnish the reasons for, as well as specific recommendations, for alternative language.

The above factors will be taken into account in evaluating proposals. Proposals that take substantial exceptions to the proposed Agreement may be determined by the City, at its sole discretion, to be unacceptable and no longer considered for award.

Insurance Requirements
The selected Proposer(s), at Proposer’s sole cost and expense and for the full term of the Agreement or any extension thereof, shall obtain and maintain, at a minimum, all of the insurance requirements outlined in Attachment D.

All policies, endorsements, certificates and/or binders shall be subject to the approval of the Human Resources Director/Risk Manager of the City of Manteca as to form and content.

These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the Human Resources Director/Risk Manager. The selected Proposer agrees to provide the City with a copy of said policies, certificates and/or endorsement upon award of contract.

7. REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS
City staff will evaluate the proposals provided based on the following criteria:

7.1 Thoroughness and understanding of the tasks to be completed:

7.2 Background and experience with similar work projects/analyses:

7.3 Recent public sector experience, preferably in a municipal setting:

7.4 Demonstrated knowledge and experience in Plan Review and Building Inspections:

7.5 Staff experience and overall experience of personnel assigned to work:

7.6 Cost:

7.7 Familiarity with the City of Manteca:

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
The selection committee will make a selection and accept the successful proposal. The acceptance of the proposal will be evidenced by written Notice of Award to the successful Proposer.

8. ORAL INTERVIEWS
Proposers may be required to participate in an oral interview. The oral interview will be a panel comprised of members of the selection committee and will be conducted via Zoom and will not be held in person.

Proposers may only ask questions that are intended to clarify the questions that they are being asked to respond.

Each Proposer’s time slot for oral interviews will be determined randomly.

Proposers who are selected shall make every effort to attend. If representatives of the City experience difficulty on the part of any Proposer in scheduling a time for the oral interview, it may result in disqualification from further consideration.

9. PUBLIC NATURE OF MATERIALS
Responses to this RFP become the exclusive property of the City of Manteca. At such time as the Chief Building Official recommends to form to the City Manager or to the City Council, as applicable, all proposals received in response to this RFP becomes a matter of public record and shall be regarded as public records, with the exception of those elements in each proposal which are defined by the Proposer as business or trade secrets and plainly marked as “Confidential,” “Trade Secret,” or “Proprietary”. The City shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any such proposal or portions thereof, if they are not plainly marked as “Confidential,” “Trade Secret,” or “Proprietary” or if disclosure is required under the Public Records Act. Any proposal which contains language purporting to render all or significant portions of the proposal “Confidential,” “Trade Secret,” or “Proprietary” shall be regarded as non-responsive.

Although the California Public Records Act recognizes that certain confidential trade secret information may be protected from disclosure, the City of Manteca may not accept or approve that the information that a Proposer submits is a trade secret. If a request is made for information marked “Confidential,” “Trade Secret,” or “Proprietary,” the City shall provide the Proposer who submitted the information with reasonable notice to allow the Proposer to seek protection from disclosure by a court of competent jurisdiction.

10. COLLUSION
By submitting a proposal, each Proposer represents and warrants that its proposal is genuine and not a sham or collusive or made in the interest of or on behalf of any person not named therein; that the Proposer has not directly induced or solicited any other person to submit a sham proposal or any other person to refrain from submitting a proposal; and that the Proposer has not in any manner sought collusion to secure any improper advantage over any other person submitting a proposal.

11. DISQUALIFICATION
Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Factors such as, but not limited to, any of the following may be considered just cause to disqualify a proposal without further consideration:

11.1 Evidence of collusion, directly or indirectly, among Proposers in regard to the amount, terms or conditions of this proposal;

11.2 Any attempt to improperly influence any member of the evaluation team;

11.3 Existence of any lawsuit, unresolved contractual claim or dispute between Proposer and the City;

11.4 Evidence of incorrect information submitted as part of the proposal;

11.5 Evidence of Proposer’s inability to successfully complete the responsibilities and obligation of the proposal; and

11.6 Proposer’s default under any previous agreement with the City, which results in termination of the Agreement.

12. NON-CONFORMING PROPOSAL
A proposal shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the provisions of these RFP instructions and specifications. Any alteration, omission, addition, variance, or limitation of, from or to a proposal may be sufficient grounds for non-acceptance of the proposal, at the sole discretion of the City.

13. GRATUITIES
No person shall offer, give or agree to give any City employee any gratuity, discount or offer of employment in connection with the award of contract by the city. No city employee shall solicit, demand, accept or agree to accept from any other person a gratuity, discount or offer of employment in connection with a city contract.

14. FIRMS OR PERSONS NOT ELIGIBLE TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL
In order to avoid any conflict of interest or perception of a conflict or interest, Proposer(s) selected to provide professional services under this RFP will be subject to the following requirements:

14.1 The Proposer(s) who works on the procurement will be precluded from submitting proposals or bids as a prime contractor or subcontractor in the ultimate procurement.

14.2 The Proposer(s) may not have interest in any potential Proposer for the ultimate procurement.

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca – RFP for Professional Services
Attachment A
Proposer’s Information Form
PROPOSER (please print):

Name: _______________________________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ Email: _________________________________ Contact person, title, email, and telephone: _______________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Proposer, if selected, intends to carry on the business as (check one):
 Individual
 Joint Venture
 Partnership
 Corporation
When incorporated? ______________
In what state? _______________
When authorized to do business in California? _______
 Other (explain):____________________________________________________

ADDENDA
To assure that all Proposers have received each addendum, check the appropriate box(es) below.

Failure to acknowledge receipt of an addendum/addenda may be considered an irregularity in the Proposal:

Addendum number(s) received: �1; � 2; �3; �4; �5; �6;
Or, _____ _____No Addendum/Addenda Were Received (check and initial).

PROPOSER’S SIGNATURE
No proposal shall be accepted which has not been signed in ink in the appropriate space below:

By signing below, the submission of a proposal shall be deemed a representation and certification by the Proposer that they have investigated all aspects of the RFP, that they are aware of the applicable facts pertaining to the RFP process, its procedures and requirements, and they have read and understand the RFP. No request for modification of the proposal shall be considered after its submission on the grounds that the Proposer was not fully informed as to any fact or condition.

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

1. If Proposer is INDIVIDUAL, sign here
Date:______________ _____________________________________ Proposer’s Signature
_____________________________________
Proposer’s typed name and title

2. If Proposer is PARTNERSHIP or JOINT VENTURE; at least two (2) Partners shall sign here:
________________________________________________
Partnership or Joint Venture Name (type or print)
Date:______________ _____________________________________ Member of the Partnership or Joint Venture signature
Date:______________ _____________________________________ Member of the Partnership or Joint Venture signature

3. If Proposer is a CORPORATION, the duly authorized officer shall sign as follows:

The undersigned certify that he/she is respectively:
_________________________________ and ___________________________ Signature Title
Of the corporation named below; that they are designated to sign the Proposal Cost Form by resolution (attach a certified copy, with corporate seal, if applicable, notarized as to its authenticity or Secretary’s certificate of authorization) for and on behalf of the below named CORPORATION, and that they are authorized to execute same for and on behalf of said CORPORATION. ______________________________________
Corporation Name (type or print)
By:______________________________________ Date: _________________ Title:__________________________________________
Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca – RFP for Professional Services
Attachment B – Scope of Work
Scope of Services
Consultant has two key tasks:

1. Provide On-Call Building Department Staffing.
• Consultant will provide building department support staff to include building inspector, permit technicians, deputy building official, and on-site plans examiners/engineer, on an on-call basis for the City of Manteca. • Consultant will provide interim staff within one business day and full-time staff within two business days. Consultant will provide staff from their database of qualified personnel. For requests less than twenty-four (24) hours’ notice, Consultant will make every effort possible to secure suitable candidates.

2. Provide Plan Review Services.
• The Consultant shall review all plans and supporting documents submitted for projects for which a Building permit is requested. If, after initial review the documents are found to be in substantial compliance with the State Building Code and local ordinances, the plans, and documents shall be stamped as reviewed and accepted for construction. If corrections are found to be needed a report shall be prepared by the Consultant specifying the needed corrections, and shall be transmitted to the applicant. When plans and supporting documents are deemed acceptable for permit issuance, the applicant shall deliver the Building Permit application and all supporting documents to the Consultant (or City Hall) for permit processing.
• Plan Reviews will be subject to the following maximum turn-around times:

The Building Safety Division of the Development Services Department aspires to create a safe and beautiful City, where the natural environment is protected, where it’s a good place to do business, where excellent services are provided, where citizens have a say in government, and to ensure that all construction projects adhere to all State and Local Codes and Laws.

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
The Building Safety Division is responsible for:
• the regulation and implementation of building standards with regard to public health, safety, and accessibility with the City of Manteca maintaining and overseeing compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan • operating a “one-stop” permit processing operation responsible for coordination of application review by other city departments including Development Services, Public Works, Planning, and Fire
• process numerous types of commercial and residential building permits • calculate development fees and building permits relevant to each submitted building permit application
• conduct plan review on each submitted project verifying compliance with applicable State and Local Codes
• schedule and conduct inspections on permitted projects at each necessary point of progress verifying compliance with the approved plans • investigate complaints related to work without permits, illegal work, and nonpermitted structures and issue notices of violation as necessary • assist residents, contractors, and developers through the plan review, permitting, and construction process and answer any questions that they might have related to construction
The project consists of providing as needed Plan Review and Building Inspection Services as mentioned above that will support the City of Manteca’s Building Safety Division.

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca – RFP for Professional Services
Attachment C – Sample Agreement for Professional Services

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into this ____ day of _____, 20__, by and between the CITY OF MANTECA, a public body, corporate and politic ("City") and _____________, a ___________ corporation ("Consultant").

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform the professional services required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification, and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions specified herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render the professional services set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the __________ services described in the attached Exhibit A that is incorporated by this reference, and pursuant to the Proposal submitted by Consultant dated ______, and attached hereto as Exhibit B. Consultant shall provide these services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in Exhibit A, subject to the direction of the City through its staff that may be provided from time to time. Performance of the ______ services is sometimes referred to herein as “the Project.”

2. Work through City Staff. Consultant shall perform its services pursuant to this Agreement solely through City staff. No communications, information or documentations shall be made directly to any applicant to the City without the prior written consent of the City. This shall not apply to the sole request of information or clarification of information by Consultant from the applicant. All requests shall be noted to City in an expeditious manner.

3. Time of Performance. The length of this contract shall be for two years. The contract may be extended for an additional three (3) one year terms with agreement of the City and Contractor for a total of five years possible.

Contractor’s services will commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall be completed in accordance with the Schedule of Activities. Failure to submit work products in accordance with the Schedule of Activities, attached hereto as Exhibit A may result in the City withholding payments.

Repeated failure to complete work products may result in a reduction of the total compensation provided for in Section 4 herein.

4. Compensation. Without additional authorization from the City, compensation to be paid to Consultant shall not exceed _____________ DOLLARS ($______). Payment by City under this Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any defects, even if those defects were known to the City at the time of payment.

5. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City specifying and describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include a brief description of the services performed and the date the services were performed.

City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

Payments may be delayed by City if Consultant fails to provide services in accordance with the Schedule of Activities, unless the City has provided prior written consent to any delay in the schedule.

Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without the City’s prior written authorization.

8. Ownership of Documents; Confidentiality.

9. Consultant's Books and Records.

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
A. Consultant shall maintain all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City, for a minimum period of three years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.

11. Interest of Consultant.

B. Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
(1) will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to its rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City, or of any City official, other than normal Agreement monitoring; and
(2) possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond the rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel. (FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2).)

12. Professional Ability of Consultant.

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
A. City is relying upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of expertise.

B. The primary provider of the services required by this Agreement shall be ______________. A list of other individuals assigned to the Project will be provided to City for its review and approval, and these individuals shall not be replaced without the City’s prior written consent.

13. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the customary standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, codes, ordinances, and regulations.

16. Insurance Requirements.

Job specific insurance requirements can be found on the attached Exhibit 1. Other insurance provisions can be found below:

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
(3) The insurance shall apply to each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. (4) The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, and agents. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.
(4) The insurance provided by the policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days written notice has been received by the City.
(7) The City will not accept any endorsements that were issued in 2004.

Acceptable endorsement forms are CG 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10 10 01 and CG 20 37 10 01.

D. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide to City certificates of insurance with original endorsements as evidence of the required insurance coverage. Certificates of insurance shall be filed with the City on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with the City at all times during the term of this Agreement.

If to City: City of Manteca
1001 W. Center Street
Manteca, CA 95337
Attention: _______________
If to Consultant: ________________________
________________________
________________________
Attention: _______________

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

19. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

21. Waiver. Waiver of any breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach or default of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

23. Controlling Law; Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, and any legal action relating to this Agreement shall be brought in a state or federal court in the County of San Joaquin.

25. Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and shall divide the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS/ENDISPUTE ("JAMS") or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS, and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation.

28. Prohibited Interests.

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
A. Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has neither paid nor agreed to pay any person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability.

30. Precedence. In case of conflict between Consultant’s Proposal dated ____ and this Agreement (which includes Exhibit A and Exhibit C) this Agreement and its exhibits shall take precedence over Consultant’s proposal.

This Space Purposely Left Blank
Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
TO EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT, each of the parties has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized representative as of the date set forth in the introductory paragraph on page 1 above.

CITY OF MANTECA, CONSULTANT:
a public body, corporate and politic _______________________________ a ___________ corporation
By:__________________________ By:__________________________ Name: _______________________ Name: ________________
Title: Mayor Title: _________________
ATTEST:
_____________________________
_______________, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
City Attorney
Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca – RFP for Professional Services
Attachment D

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Consultants shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.

Minimum Limits of Insurance: Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

Commercial General Liability
• Commercial General Liability Insurance with $1,000,000 minimum limit per occurrence. • If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. • Commercial General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement naming the following as insured on 2001 or earlier issued endorsement forms:
“City of Manteca, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers”.

Automobile Liability
If the vehicles are brought onto city facilities, covering any auto, or of Contractor has no owned autos, hired, and non-owned autos, the Contractor shall maintain automobile liability with limits no less than:
• Automobile Liability Insurance with $1,000,000 minimum limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
• Automobile Liability Additional Insured Endorsement naming the following as additional insured:
“City of Manteca, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers”.

Worker’s Compensation
As required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions)
Insurance appropriates to the Contractor’s profession, with limit no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $1,000,000 aggregate
Other Insurance Provisions:

The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City of Manteca, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as insured’s as respect to: liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used).

2. For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. The applicant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

4. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City of Manteca.

Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the Entity before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City of Manteca reserves the right to require complete, certified copes of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the Entity.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Manteca
Waiver of Subrogation
Consultant hereby grants to The City of Manteca a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the Entity by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the Entity has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that The City of Manteca is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.

SPECIAL RISKS OR CIRCUMSTANCES
The City of Manteca reserves the right to modify these requirements based on the nature of the risk, prior events, insurance coverage, or other special circumstances.

Attachment 1 - Request for Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Proposal to Provide
Building Safety
Plan Check and Inspection Services
Prepared by:

BPR Consulting Group
2201 Francisco Drive
Suite #140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
April 27, 2022
Prepared for:

City of Manteca
Building Safety Division
1215 W. Center Street, Suite 201
Manteca, CA 95337
Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
April 27, 2022
City of Manteca
Building Safety Division
Mr. Brad Wungluck
1215 W. Center Street, Suite 201
Manteca, CA 95337
RE: RFP for Professional Services | City of Manteca Plan Review and Building Inspection Services Dear Mr. Wungluck,
Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal in response to the City of Manteca’s RFP for Building Plan Review and Inspection Services. Our proposal provides a detailed overview of the services provided by BPR Consulting Group (BPR). In an effort to maintain a consistent level of service to the community as workload increases, we understand that the City of Manteca’s Building Safety Division is looking to partner with experienced consultants to provide third party services to include Plan Review and Building Department Staffing, including Inspection services. We believe BPR is well-equipped to provide the City with the requested services in a professional and customer-focused manner.

As our proposal will demonstrate, our talented staff of Plans Examiners, Building Inspectors, Permit Technicians, Licensed Engineers, and CASp experts have extensive experience providing building department services similar to those being requested by the City of Manteca. BPR’s staff members have previous experience providing these services for numerous public agencies throughout the State of California including the Cities of Richmond, San Ramon, Milpitas, Vallejo, Davis, Sacramento, Woodland, Elk Grove, Calistoga, Napa, Manteca, Gardena, Arroyo Grande, Garden Grove, Inglewood, Monterey Park, Wildomar, Anaheim, Lemoore and Turlock, to name a few.

BPR’s staff of experienced building safety personnel provide high quality, thorough plan review, inspection and permit technician services for our clients and their permit applicants. Our qualified professionals and expertise allow us to assist you and your department to maintain service levels during periods of increased workload and staffing fluctuations. Unlike the large national firms, BPR’s services are focused on supporting California communities in the delivery of high-quality, building department services, tailored to your community’s specific needs, with the goal of exceeding our clients’ expectations by:
 Providing all services in a cost-effective manner.
 Providing qualified and experienced personnel who have the ability to effectively communicate and explain relevant code requirements to designers, contractors, and owner builders.  Providing a high level of customer service for internal and external customers.  Balancing the need to ensure conformance to standards and regulations with the need for predictability, uniformity, and efficiency.
 Providing services in a timely manner.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
The team proposed to serve the City of Manteca are all appropriately licensed in the State of California or ICC Certified and are experienced and well-versed in providing the requested services in support of California Building Departments.

Bill Rodgers will serve as Project Manager and Ron Beehler as Principal-in-Charge. During the proposal process, Ron will be the primary point of contact and as a principal of BPR Consulting Group, Ron is authorized to bind the firm to all commitments made in our proposal. We have carefully reviewed the City’s RFP and Scope of Work; we fully understand the information that was provided and believe our proposal response is complete and wholly compliant to the City’s RFP requirements. The information provided is true, correct and prepared without any collusion.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions concerning our qualifications or the services we provide. I can be reached at [email protected] 916.204.3178. Thank you for taking the time to review our qualifications.

We look forward to the opportunity to work with the City of Manteca.

Sincerely,

BPR CONSULTING GROUP
Ron Beehler, SE, CBO
Director of Client Services
Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter
Chapter 1
PROPOSAL SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 1 Proposal Summary....................................................................................................... 1 Primary Contacts.......................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2
FIRM PROFILE...................................................................................................................... 4 Firm Overview .............................................................................................................. 4 Financial Stability, Capacity, Resources ..................................................................... 5 Litigation ...................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 3
QUALIFICATIONS................................................................................................................. 6 Proposed Team ............................................................................................................ 6 Licenses & Certifications............................................................................................11 Relevant Experience...................................................................................................14 Project Matrix .............................................................................................................20 References ..................................................................................................................21 Project Understanding & Approach...........................................................................23 Chapter 4
PROPOSAL EXCEPTIONS ..................................................................................................33 Chapter 5
PROPOSAL COSTS SHEET AND RATES.............................................................................34 Appendix
Proposer’s Information Form/RFP Attachment A
Resumes

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
CHAPTER 1

PROPOSAL SUMMARY
BPR Consulting Group (BPR) understands the City of
Manteca’s Building Safety Division desires to partner with outside consulting firms to provide Plan Review and On-Call Building Department staffing, to include Inspection Services.

Our proposal will demonstrate that BPR possesses the
qualified staff and expertise necessary to provide these services to the City with the purpose of maintaining a highlevel of customer service and reasonable response times to the community and ultimately, ensuring that construction projects adhere to all applicable State and Local codes and laws.

Seamlessly integrating municipal service professionals in support of public agencies is BPR Consulting Group’s sole purpose. BPR was founded by individuals with a long history of serving municipalities and public agencies throughout California and Nevada. We have extensive experience in all aspects of building safety, including building official, plan review, inspection, and permit technician services. We have worked with public agencies throughout California to provide these same services.

Our Building Safety Division consists of licensed structural, civil, mechanical, electrical and fire protection engineers; Certified Access Specialist (CASp) professionals; ICC-certified building officials, plans examiners, inspectors, permit technicians; and highly experienced administrative personnel.

Our proposed project manager, Bill Rodgers, SE, has the skills, experience, code knowledge, and the ability to work with the City to identify, think through, and recommend solutions to any plan review or inspection related issues that may arise. Bill will be supported by a team of professionals that have a proven track record of providing efficient and predictable building department services in support of California communities. Several of our staff members have provided services in support of the City’s building department in the past and understand the types and complexities of projects permitted by the building department. Our key objectives in providing these services in support of the City of Manteca are as follows:
 To provide timely and responsive plan review services. Our well qualified, professionally licensed and/or CASp and ICC Certified team of plans examiners will provide you with comprehensive, efficient, and timely building department plan review services including clear communication of plan review results. We will work with you to tailor our services to align with any unique or specific project needs. Our experienced and licensed team of structural, mechanical, electrical and fire protection engineers will ensure an appropriate level of plan review is provided for all assigned projects.  To be responsive to your specific inspection staffing needs. As construction and development activity fluctuates within your community, we will provide qualified and certified inspection staff to support your building department and adjust our service levels as needed to maintain seamless service to your customers.

Page #1 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
 To provide timely and responsive Building Department Staffing. We have a team of support staff including experienced building inspectors, permit technicians, building officials, and plans examinations staff that are able to assist your department with quality, customer focused services. Our building department staff have assisted numerous California building departments and understand the California laws applicable to your building department projects.
 To provide staff who have the appropriate experience, certifications, and knowledge. We will utilize appropriately experienced, licensed, qualified, and certified staff to perform all identified services.

As you review our proposal, please note the following highlights:

Chapter 2 of this proposal provides an overview of our company’s background and structure. You will see that we have the resources to provide the requested services without utilizing any sub-consultants.

In Chapter 3 we provide information on the qualifications of the firm as well as the team selected to serve the City. In this section we share brief biographies of our proposed team for service to the City of Manteca and an overview of the licenses and certifications they possess. We also provide a sampling of relevant projects our team has provided services in support of as well as client references where we have provided services similar to those being requested by the City. Finally, in this Chapter we will discuss our Project Understanding and Approach.

In Chapter 4 you will see that BPR does not have any issues, exceptions or proposed changes to the City’s RFP conditions, requirements or sample agreement.

Chapter 5 of this proposal includes BPR’s proposed costs and rates. We believe our proposed fees to be competitive, fair and reasonable.

We have also included an Appendix which includes the Proposer Information Form which was Attachment-A in the City’s RFP and complete resumes for our team proposed to serve the City of Manteca.

Page #2 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR

PRIMARY CONTACTS
For the City of Manteca, we have identified the following key staff members who will oversee and manage the delivery of all services to the City of Manteca.

Ron Beehler, SE, CBO
Principal-in-Charge
2201 Francisco Dr., #140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
[email protected]
916.204.3178
Bill Rodgers, SE
Principal/Project Manager
2201 Francisco Dr., #140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
[email protected]
916.662.0665
Roger Peterson, SE
Principal/Plan Review Manager
2201 Francisco Dr., #140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
[email protected]
916.202.2902
Page #3 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
CHAPTER 2

FIRM PROFILE
BPR Consulting Group was founded with the sole focus of providing thorough and efficient plan review, building inspection, and other building department support services on behalf of California communities. Our leadership team has worked together for the past 16 years and collectively possesses more than 100 years of experience providing building safety services to cities, counties, state agencies and other municipal agencies throughout California
and the western United States. Our focus is to
support California building departments in a
professional manner by providing efficient,
timely and professional building safety services for the communities we serve. We have extensive experience providing all aspects of building safety services and presently provide building department plan review, building inspection and permit technician services, similarto those being requested, to multiple California Building Departments. We are also experienced in providing plan review, inspection and permit technician services for high profile and unique projects. We have worked with numerous public agencies throughout California to provide these same services.

Our Building Safety Division consists of the following: California licensed structural, civil, mechanical, electrical and fire protection engineers; Certified Access Specialist (CASp) professionals; ICC-certified building officials, plans examiners, inspectors, permit technicians, and highly experienced administrative personnel.

Building department services we provide to municipalities and agencies include:
 Building safety plan review services
 Building Official services
 Building inspection services
 Building department management services
 CASp plan review and inspection services
 Permit Technician Services
 Building department support services
 Fire prevention plan review and inspection services
 Civil plan review and inspection services
Our team has a proven track record of providing efficient and predictable building department services in support of California communities and for unique and fast paced building projects. Our key objectives in providing these services in support of the City of Manteca are as follows:
 To share our wealth of building Department experience. Our staff has been intimately involved in the management of multiple California Building Departments and we will use this experience to the benefit of the Manteca’s Building Department.
 To provide timely and responsive plan review services. Our well qualified and professionally licensed team of plans examiners will provide you with efficient and timely building department plan review services NAME &STRUCTURE OF FIRM:

BPR Consulting Group
S Corporation
DGS Certified Small Business
SACRAMENTO REGION OFFICE:
2201 Francisco Drive
Suite 140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Page #4 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
including clear communication of plan review results. We will work with you to tailor our services to align with your unique and specific community needs.
 To be responsive to your specific staffing needs. As construction and development activity fluctuates within your community, we will adjust our service levels to maintain seamless service to your customers.  To provide Building Department Staff who have the appropriate experience, certifications, and knowledge. We will utilize appropriately experienced and qualified staff to perform all identified services.

Firm Resources
As a full-service building department consulting company, BPR Consulting Group maintains full time staff of over forty individuals with the experience, aptitude and qualifications to perform all aspects of the building department services the City is requesting. Our significant depth of staff resources allows BPR the ability to address our clients’ needs quickly and seamlessly providing one or multiple building safety professionals to meet requested staffing needs. Our plan review team has the depth of resources necessary to complete all plan review assignments, thoroughly and on time. Our depth of inspection resources allows us the ability to provide experienced and well qualified building inspectors when needed. At BPR, our primary focus is to provide high quality building services in support of public agency building departments. Our plan review and inspection staff work in a collaborative manner to share information and experience to provide thorough and consistent plan reviews and inspection services. We understand our role in the development process and take our work and commitment to our clients seriously.

Financial Stability
BPR Consulting Group holds a sound financial standing. We maintain adequate cash reserves to meet the ongoing business needs of our firm. Additionally, BPR has no outstanding debt and neither BPR nor any of its principals has ever filed for bankruptcy.

Litigation / Lawsuits
BPR Consulting Group has not been involved in any lawsuit or litigation that a) resulted from any public project undertaken by BPR or any of our sub-consultants or b) any project where claims or settlements were paid by BPR or our insurers.

Page #5 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
CHAPTER 3

QUALIFICATIONS
The founders of BPR share the values of providing quality services and a very high level of customer service to our clients. Our focus is to support California building departments in a professional manner allowing our clients to maintain timely building safety services for the communities they serve. We have qualified staff with extensive experience in all aspects of building safety, including the plan review, inspection, and on-call building department staffing services that the City is requesting. Our plans examination and inspection team proposed for service to the City of Manteca have experience plan reviewing and inspecting all types of projects from simple room additions and tenant improvements to master plans, podium buildings, mid-rise buildings, multifamily residential projects, distribution centers and entertainment venues. Our experience includes multiple high-rise buildings with smoke control systems and commercial kitchens The Organization Chart below provides an overview of our staff proposed for service to the City of Manteca.

Page #6 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR

TEAM INTRODUCTION
BPR Consulting Group maintains a staff of highly qualified Building Officials, Engineers, Plans Examiners, Building Inspectors, CASp professionals and Permit Technicians. All of our staff maintain appropriate certifications or professional licenses for the services they provide. We encourage our staff to continually obtain additional certifications and support ongoing training and education for our staff. Our focus is to maintain the highest and best qualified building department staff in the industry. BPR’s staff has a proven track record of providing high quality and timely services on behalf of the public agencies we serve. BPR has the necessary resources available to provide all the proposed services to the City of Manteca.

Ron Beehler, SE, CBO PRINICPAL-IN-CHARGE
Ron is licensed as a Civil and Structural Engineer in California and Nevada, certified by the International Code Council as a Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector, Ron is uniquely qualified to evaluate and manage all building department services. He utilizes experience gained through more than 35 years of handson experience performing life safety, accessibility and structural plan reviews to successfully manage building department plan review services, including building department plan review services for high-profile projects on behalf of public agencies throughout California. Ron’s experience includes establishing and coordinating on-site building department services for large multi-building projects and unique fast paced development projects. His background includes the position of Chief Building Official with the City of Sacramento directing a staff of 120 engineers, plan reviewers and building inspectors, Chief of Engineering Design and Construction for the California National Guard and Senior Structural Engineer with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). Ron has served as Chief Building Official for multiple California public agencies including interim assignments. Ron will manage all contract and billing issues and will be the individual authorized to negotiate and execute the Consultant Services Agreement with the City.

Bill Rodgers, SE PRINCIPAL // PROJECT MANAGER
Bill will act as the Project Manager, and primary contact during the delivery of services. Bill has more than 30 years of experience in the field of structural engineering, including over 20 years of experience as a plan review engineer. Bill has worked closely with Building Departments across the State of California and Nevada for nearly 20 years and has assisted the government agencies with plan review of numerous projects throughout the years. His wealth of experience includes managing plan review services throughout California and Nevada on behalf of public agency clients and performing structural plan review for commercial and residential projects.

In addition to providing structural plan review services, Bill is responsible for management of BPR’s plan review team and plan review services.

Roger Peterson, SE PRINICPAL // PLAN REVIEW MANAGER
A registered Structural Engineer, Roger is an experienced building safety professional with over 34 years of experience in structural design and plan review. He has designed and provided plan review services for multistory steel and concrete-framed buildings, as well as single-story structures utilizing steel, concrete, timber, and masonry framing systems. Roger’s design experience includes schools, commercial and industrial projects, micro-chip production facilities, power plant installations and multi-family residential projects. He currently manages numerous high-profile plan review and inspection services for multiple public agency clients. Roger Page #7 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
has managed plan review and inspection services in support of multiple large high-profile specialty projects such as the Newport Beach Civic Center, the Hatchet Ridge Wind Farm and the Hollywood Park Office, Retail and Residential projects. Roger is available to support the City with management of specific high-profile projects that require detailed knowledge of the plan review and inspection process in order to ensure their timely completion.

David Castillo, ME, FPE PLAN REVIEW
David brings more than 35 years of breadth, depth, and knowledge of mechanical engineering, design, and plan review to any project. A California licensed professional Mechanical Engineer and Fire Protection Engineer, his expertise encompasses HVAC, Plumbing, Medical Gases, and Fire Sprinklers. David’s background includes mechanical engineering, design, and plan review on Central Treatment Centers, Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities, Inpatient Mental Health Clinics, and Inmate Housing Units for the Department of Corrections. He has engineered and designed Acute Care Hospitals, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Surgery Clinics, Psychiatric Hospitals, Pharmaceutical Plants, Industrial Plants, Educational Facilities, and Hi-Rise Commercial Buildings. Years of Experience: 36
Jerome Schreiber, EE, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Jerome has more than 40 years of electrical industry experience. He is a licensed electrical engineer in California and Hawaii and is certified by the International Association of Electrical Inspectors as an Electrical Plans Examiner and Electrical Inspector. Jerome’s experience is wide and varied, having provided engineering services to the military, public utilities, private organizations and municipal agencies. Years of Experience: 40 Rick Maddox, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Richard brings over 25 years of experience in all aspects of plan review and building inspections. Richard provides accurate and complete electrical plan reviews of residential and commercial buildings. While working for Clark County, Richard represented his department for multiple years at all electrical industry events such as IAEI, IEEE, AGC, NEMA, ABC, SNHBA and IBEW. Richard maintains his electrical plan review and inspection skills by regularly participating in industry and code related training and attending electrical safety and electrical industry symposiums. Years of Experience: 27
Andrew Burke, CASp, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Andrew is a Certified Access Specialist and ICC certified Plans Examiner with more than 17 years of industry experience in plan review, inspection, administration and estimating. Andrew has extensive plan check experience in multi-story mixed use projects and provides in-depth review of accessibility issues to ensure compliance with all California building codes. His CASp certification provides him the ability to ensure all aspects of accessibility have been achieved. His formal training in ICC codes, as well as on-the-job experience, helps him to provide thorough and accurate commercial and residential plan reviews and inspections. Andrew is an excellent asset to any building department both in the office and out in the field. Years of Experience: 10 Mark Berg, CBO, MCP, ICC PLAN REVIEW
Mark is an ICC Certified Building Official, Plans Examiner, Building Inspector, and Master Code Professional with experience performing life-safety, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and fire reviews in residential, Page #8 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
multi-family and commercial projects. Mark has successfully guided department staff with inspection and plan review of all phases of complex construction projects. He is experienced utilizing building department permit tracking software and managing all common building department responsibilities, including plan review, multidiscipline inspections, plan review and inspection scheduling, field supervision, regulatory compliance, code interpretation, and project acceptance. Mark also possesses exceptional skills in complaint resolution, problem solving, damage assessment and team building. Years of Experience: 31 Tim Scott, CBO, ICC PLAN REVIEW
For the past 20 years Tim has provided building safety services on behalf of Northern California communities. Tim served as the Deputy Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspectorfor the City of Davis, City of Elk Grove and the County of Sacramento. His experience as a Deputy Building Official exposed him to the many facets of managing a Building Department and allowed him to develop the exceptional organizational and management skills necessary to provide superior services to the communities he serves. Tim’s experience includes plan review and inspection for all types and sizes of projects including residential, multi-family, commercial, institutional, and industrial projects. He is familiar with multiple permit tracking software systems utilized by jurisdictions and has managed all facets of building department services. Tim currently utilizes his skills as a Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector to benefit Northern California communities. Years of Experience: 22 Isidoro Zapien, ICC PLAN REVIEW / INSPECTION
Isidoro is an Inspector with 25 years of experience in the construction industry. He has extensive experience and is currently certified in structural steel and welding, high strength bolting, spray applied fireproofing, structural masonry and reinforced concrete. Isidoro is also nuclear gauge certified with experience in soils and asphalt. He has performed various inspection services including quality assurance and quality control to ensure projects were built in accordance with approved plans, specifications and specified codes. Years of Experience: 25 Mark Meyers, CBO, ICC PLAN REVIEW / INSPECTION
For over 30 years, Mark served as a Building Official, Deputy Building Official, Building Inspector, Plans Examiner and Permit Coordinator for the City and County of Madera and the City of Clovis. He has implemented permit tracking software for multiple jurisdictions, prepared operating budgets and managed all facets of building department activities. He currently serves as an Inspection Manager and Building Official, supervising plan review, inspection and clerical staff for the County of Madera and other Central Valley clients. Years of Experience: 31 Rick Walters, CASp, LEED, CBO, ICC PLAN REVIEW / INSPECTION Rick has over numerous years of experience in the construction industry with over 30 of those years in the Building Inspection industry. Rick has experience as a building official and inspector. He has provided senior inspector services in disaster zones for floods and wildfires which required communication with the National Guard, elected officials and law enforcement. Additionally, Rick is experienced in inspection management, council meetings, planning meetings, city and county design review meetings, field inspections, permit tracking and issuance, record keeping, construction techniques, and office procedures. Years of Experience: 33 Page #9 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Landon Collins, ICC INSPECTION
Landon has 17 years of experience in the construction industry. He is an ICC certified inspector with experience providing building, mechanical, electrical and plumbing inspections to residential projects well as providing commercial building inspections for Cities and Counties. He provides Building Department inspection services to ensure projects were built in accordance with approved plans, specifications and specified codes. Landon also brings considerable experience from working for several construction companies in the Central Valley Region. Years of Experience: 17
Dan Garcia, PE, REA, CPP CIVIL ONSITE & GRADING REVIEW
Dan is a licensed civil engineer with approximately 38 years of public works engineering and project management experience. He has served in senior and executive management public works positions with the cities of Maywood, Costa Mesa, Norwalk, El Segundo, Solvang, Culver City and Novato. Daniel brings to each project experience and expertise in the areas of Capital Improvement Program management, Private Development, Grading, Parks and Land Use, Water Resources and Transportation Planning. Years of Experience: 38 Stacy Barker, ICC PERMIT TECHNICIAN / ADMIN CLERK
Stacy is an ICC Certified Permit Technician with seven years of experience providing services to multiple Northern California municipal clients. In addition to her technical abilities, Stacy has excellent customer service skills that help her to work well with applicants and City staff. She is efficient in the use of the GreenVue’s Digital Permit Suite, Accela Automation, Community Core, as well as other municipal tracking systems. Years of Experience: 7 Alicia Ventura, ICC PERMIT TECHNICIAN / ADMIN CLERK
Aliciais an ICC Certified Permit Technician with over nineyears of experience providing services to multiple California municipal clients. Alicia is well versed in her role as a Permit Technician and has worked with several municipal tracking systems including Trakit. In addition to her technical abilities, Alicia has excellent customer service skills that help her to work well with applicants and City staff. In addition, Alicia is fluent in Spanish, proficient with Microsoft Office software including Word, Excel and PowerPoint, is detail oriented and is able to multi-task. Years of Experience: 9
Samantha Barker, ICC PERMIT TECHNICIAN / ADMIN CLERK
Samantha is an ICC Certified Permit Technician with experience providing Permit Technician services in support for municipal building departments. Samantha’s experience includes updating data bases, data input, permit tracking system management, and report generation. In addition to her technical abilities, Samantha utilizes her excellent customer service skills to assist department customers, applicants, and City staff. Samantha is efficient, detail oriented and possesses the ability to multi-task. Years of Experience: 1 Nancy Meyers, ICC PERMIT TECHNICIAN / ADMIN CLERK
Nancy is an ICC Certified Permit Technician with over thirty years of experience providing accounting, administrative and customer service to public and private clients. Her wide range of experience has enabled her to become extremely proficient in offering an excellent attention to detail and quality customer service. Years of Experience: 2 Page #10 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Name / Role Current Licenses and Certifications
License/Cert.

Number(s)
Expiration
Date
Ron Beehler, SE, CBO,
ICC
Sr. Structural Engineer
Principal-in-Charge
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
NV Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Structural Engineer
CABO Certified Building Official
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Building Inspector
C39404
S3632
CE019992
SE019992
1492
801789
801789
801789
801789
12/31/2023
12/31/2023
12/31/2022
12/31/2022
---
05/11/2024
05/11/2024
05/11/2024
05/11/2024
Bill Rodgers, SE
Sr. Structural Engineer
Project Manager
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Structural Engineer
S4198
C50673
CE18427
SE18427
09/30/2023
09/30/2023
12/31/2023
12/31/2023
Roger Peterson, SE
Sr. Structural Engineer
Plan Review Manager
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
ID Registered Professional Civil Engineer
ID Registered Professional Structural Engineer
C46096
S3846
C8225
S8225
12/31/2022
12/31/2022
06/30/2022
06/30/2022
Mark Berg, ICC
ICC Master Code
Professional
ICC Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner
ICC Building Code Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Building Inspector
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Certified Fire Code Official
ICC Certified Fire Marshal
ICC Combination Dwelling Inspector - Uniform Codes
ICC Combination Inspector - Legacy
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Fire Code Specialist
ICC Fire Codes and Standards
ICC Fire Inspector I
ICC Fire Inspector II
ICC Fire Plans Examiner
ICC Master Code Professional
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Permit Specialist
ICC Permit Technician
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Residential Energy Inspector/Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
12/11/2022
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
10/28/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
04/27/2023
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
10/05/2024
07/14/2024
10/03/2024
10/02/2024
07/14/2024
07/14/2024
10/18/2022
04/08/2024
David Castillo, ME/FPE
Mechanical Engineer
Fire Protection Engr.

Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Mechanical Engineer
CA Registered Fire Protection Engineer
M31455
FP2013
12/31/2022
03/31/2023
Page #11 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Name / Role Current Licenses and Certifications
License/Cert.

Number(s)
Expiration
Date
Jerome Schreiber
Electrical Engineer
Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Electrical Engineer
HI Registered Professional Electrical Engineer
ICC CA Commercial Building Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
EE12290
EE13259
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
9/30/2022
n/a
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
7/27/2024
Rick Maddox, ICC
Electrical
Plan Review
ICC Building Inspector
ICC Combination Inspector
ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC Master Electrician (NV)
ATC 20 Post Disaster Training
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
000-001221
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
12/31/2024
---
Andrew Burke, CASp,
ICC
Certified Access
Specialist
Plan Review
Certified Access Specialist
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Permit Technician
CASp-710
8250398
8250398
8250398
8250398
8250398
08/12/2022
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
01/07/2025
Tim Scott, CBO, ICC
Plans Examiner
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist B8
ICC California Building Plans Examiner I6
ICC California Residential Combination Inspector J5
ICC California Residential Inspector J1
ICC California Residential Electrical Inspector J2
ICC California Residential Plumbing Inspector J3
ICC California Residential Mechanical Inspector J4
ICC California Commercial Building Inspector I1
ICC California Commercial Plumbing Inspector I3
ICC California Commercial Mechanical Inspector I4
ICC Accessibility Inspector / Plans Examiner
ICC Plumbing Inspector P5
ICC Building Inspector B5
ICC Building Inspector UBC
ICC Mechanical Inspector M5
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Building Plans Examiner B3
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
5087217
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
07/13/2024
Page #12 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Name / Role Current Licenses and Certifications
License/Cert.

Number(s)
Expiration
Date
Mark Meyers, CBO, ICC
Inspections
Plan Review
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Plumbing Code UPC
ICC Building Inspection
ICC Plumbing Inspection
ICC Plans Examiner
8005399
8005399
8005399
8005399
8005399
8005399
04/21/2024
04/21/2024
04/21/2024
04/21/2024
04/21/2024
04/21/2024
Rick Walters, CASp,

LEED, CBO, ICC
Certified Access
Specialist
Plan Review
Inspection
Certified Access Specialist
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Electrical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC CA Building Plans Examiner
ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Electrical Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Building Inspector
ICC Building Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Commercial Combination Inspector
CA LEED Certified LEED AP BD+C
IAPMO Certified Plumbing Inspector
IAPMO Certified Mechanical Inspector
CASp-439
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
1061008
10436985
030666
090146
08/02/2024
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
01/29/2026
---
---
---
Isidoro Zapien, ICC
Inspections
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Reinforced Concrete Special Inspection
ICC Spray Applied Fire Proofing Special Inspector
ICC Structural Welding Special Inspector
ICC Structural Masonry Special Inspector
ICC Structural Steel & Bolting Special Inspector
AWS Associate Certified Welding Inspector
ACI Concrete Field-Testing Technician Grade I
Nuclear Density Testing Gauge Certified
5003730
5003730
5003730
5003730
5003730
5003730
01110444
030005
12495
09/27/2024
09/01/2023
09/01/2023
09/01/2023
09/01/2023
09/01/2023
---
---
---
Landon Collins, ICC
Inspections
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Residential Building Inspector
ICC Building Inspector
8984654
8984654
8984654
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
Page #13 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Name / Role Current Licenses and Certifications
License/Cert.

Number(s)
Expiration
Date
ICC Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC Residential Electrical Inspector
ICC Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
8984654
8984654
8984654
8984654
8984654
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
05/01/2027
Dan Garcia, PE, REA,
CPP
Civil Site and Grading
Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer 45710 12/31/2022 Stacy Barker, ICC
Permit Technician
ICC Permit Technician 8821141 12/09/2023
Alicia Ventura, ICC
Permit Technician
ICC Permit Technician 9560759 9/12/2024
Samantha Barker, ICC
Permit Technician
ICC Permit Technician 10138242 11/08/2024
Nancy Meyers, ICC
Permit Technician
ICC Permit Technician 10110674 10/13/2024

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Seamlessly integrating municipal service professionals in support of public agencies is BPR Consulting Group’s sole purpose and the basis on which we were founded. BPR’s staff have extensive experience providing the same services as being requested by the City of Manteca to communities of comparable size throughout California. Our focus is to support California building departments in a professional manner allowing our clients the ability to provide efficient, timely and professional building safety services for their communities. We have extensive experience providing all aspects of building safety services in support of building departments, including building official, plan review, inspection, permit technician, and building department office suport services. We have worked with public agencies throughout California to provide these same services.

Below you will find a small sampling of projects for which BPR’s staff have provided PLAN REVIEW SERVICES, all plan review services were completed on time and within budget.

CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Walmart Remodel
Reference Contact: Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director | 805.473.5466 BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services of the remodel of a 125,440 S.F. Walmart Store. The project is Type IIB Construction with Occupancy Groups M, B and R and is fully fire sprinklered. The remodel consisted of new exterior signage, upgraded interior finishes, installation of new racks and fixtures in both the stock room and on the sales floor, remodel and upgrade of existing restrooms, a new modular kitchen, installation of new coolers, installing new doors in the existing walls and upgrading the accessibility features on the site which included new truncated domes, restriping ADA parking and paths of travel and adding ADA signage. BPR Staff: Bill Rodgers, Andrew Burke, Rick Maddox, Dave Castillo Project Dates:

Current
Page #14 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Logisticenter at Rancho Cordova
Reference Contact: Joe Cuffe, Building Official | 916.851.8866 The Logisticenter project consists of a new 155,076 S.F., one story shell building and associated site improvements. The proposed building will be of Type IIIB Constructions with Groups S-1 and B Occupancies and will be fully fire sprinklered. The construction of the building consists of a hybrid roof system constructed of plywood sheathing supported by wood sub-purlins which are supported by steel open-webbed truss joists and girders. The roof structure is supported by concrete walls at the perimeter of the building and steel columns at the interior of the building. The wall system consists of concrete “tilt-up” wall panels. The lateral force resisting system will consist of concrete shear walls at the perimeter of the building and a concentric steel braced frame at the interior of the building. The building is supported on continuous footings at the concrete perimeter walls and pad footings at the interior columns. The floor consists of a concrete slab-on-grade.

Site improvements include landscaping, parking lots with accessible parking and paths of travel, signage, retaining walls, concrete ramps, exterior stairs, accessible curb ramps, trash enclosures, screen walls and detention pond.

BPR Consulting Group is providing complete building department plan review services forthis project including review of the site improvements and the accessibility review of the site. BPR Staff: Bill Rodgers, Andrew Burke, Rick Maddox, Dave Castillo Project Dates: Current

CITY OF CLEARLAKE
Oak Valley Villas Apartments
Reference Contact: Mark Roberts, Senior Planner | 707.994.8201 BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department plan review services for the 80-unit apartment complex. The apartment complex consists of three 19,379 sf, three story apartment buildings, one 19930 sf, three story apartment building, one 6,803 sf, two story apartment building and a 3,498 sf single story community building. The three-story apartment buildings consists of Type VA Construction with R-2 Occupancy. The two-story apartment consisted of Type VB Construction with R-2 Occupancy. The Community Building consists of Type VB Construction with B and A-3 Occupancies. All buildings are fully fire sprinklered.

The apartment buildings contain (20) one-bedroom units, (36) two-bedroom units, (18) three-bedroom units and (6) four-bedroom units.

The buildings are constructed of typical wood framed construction with manufactured floor and roof trusses being supported by wood stud bearing walls. The foundation system consists of continuous spread and isolated footings with a concrete slab on grade at the ground level. The lateral force resisting system consists of light frame wood walls sheathed with wood structural shear panels. The exterior finish consists of a combination of stucco, cementitious board & batten siding, and cementitious clapboard siding. BPR’s staff provided complete plan review services for this project on behalf of the City Clearlake. BPR Staff: Roger Peterson, Andrew Burke, Rick Maddox, Dave Castillo Project Dates: Current
Page #15 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR

COUNTY OF MADERA
Valley Children’s Hospital Materials Distribution Center 2 Reference Contact: Matthew Treber, Chief of Development Services | 559.675.7821 BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department and fire review of the Valley Children’s BPR Consulting Group provided complete building department and fire review of the Valley Children’s Hospital Materials Distribution Center. These two projects consisted of a new 25,314 S.F. single story warehouse building with a 1,813 S.F. mezzanine. The structure is Type II-B Construction with Occupancy Groups S-1 and B and is fully fire sprinklered. The building is constructed of structural steel framing, supporting steel roof decking. The roof structure is supported by steel bents and steel columns. The lateral force resisting system consists of steel moment frames and steel cross-bracing. The exterior walls consist of a combination of steel siding, stucco and stone veneer. The foundation for the structure consists of continuous footing at the perimeter of the building and typical spread pad footings at all columns and frames with a concrete slab-on-grade. The mezzanine is a steel framed self-supporting structure with a composite concrete over steel deck system. The lateral force resisting system for the mezzanine consists of steel braced frames.

Site improvements include Landscaping, parking lots with accessible parking and paths of travel, signage, retaining walls, concrete ramps, exterior stairs, accessible ramps, trash enclosures, screen walls, electrical transformer, backup generator and landscaping. BPR Staff: Roger Peterson, Andrew Burke, Rick Maddox, Dave Castillo Project Dates: 2021-2022

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK
Costco Warehouse & Fuel Station:

Reference Contact: Timothy Tran, CBO | (714) 773-5799
BPR’s staff provided building department plan review services on behalf of the City of Monterey Park for the new Costco Warehouse and Fuel Station project. Plan review services included plan review of the non-structural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, green and energy efficiency improvements associated with the project. The 154,974 SF tilt-up warehouse building utilized Type VB Construction. The fueling station utilized Type ll-B Construction.

The building was classified as a Group M Occupancy. BPR Staff:

Bill Rodgers Project Dates: 2017-2020
Page #16 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Pacific Plaza Mixed-Use Hotel and Condominium:

Reference Contact: Timothy Tran, CBO | (714) 773-5799
BPR’s staff members provided complete building plan review services for the Pacific Plaza Monterey Park project which was designed as a mixed-use project to include Hotel, Condominium and Restaurant uses. The project includes 398,792 SF within five levels above two levels of underground parking. The project utilized Construction Type I-A at the two lower parking levels and Construction Type III-A above the 2nd level. The building includes Occupancy Groups A-2, A-3, M, B and S-2. BPR Staff: Roger Peterson Project Dates: 2019-2021

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Orange County Museum of Arts:

Reference Contact: Ziad Doudar, PE, CBO | 714.754.5604
BPR’s staff members provided plan review services for this twolevel state-of-the-art museum housed is within an ultra-modern 52,000 SF building which emulates the art treasures the building was designed to showcase. The building boasts over 25,000 SF dedicated to exhibitions of modern art with the remainder of the building area dedicated to art displays and supporting function uses. A 10,000 SF portion of the interior space was designed to accommodate multipurpose, education and performance uses. The projects design includes a rooftop terrace to accommodate up to 1,000 people for special events and outdoor displays. BPR Staff: Roger Peterson Project Dates: 2018-2019

CITY OF RICHMOND
BPR staff members have provided complete plan review services for projects on behalf of the City of Richmond for many years. Below are examples of recent projects for which our staff members provided plan review services:

Noma Residential Development:

Reference Contact: Chris Castanchoa, CBO | 510.620-6764 BPR staff provided complete building department plan review services for the Places at Noma which consist of 95, three-story, single-family, detached homes; and the Rows at Noma, which consist of 18, three-story, live/work townhomes with ten different configurations. All buildings are Type V-B Construction with Group R-3 and Group U Occupancies. All buildings are platform-framed wood and are supported on conventional-spread, concrete footings with a slab-on-grade system at the first-floor level. The lateral force resisting system consisted of sitebuilt, wood-sheathed, shear walls. BPR Staff: Roger Peterson Project Dates: 2017 Page #17 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
OSHPD 3 Community Clinic:

Reference Contact: Chris Castanchoa, CBO | 510.6206764
BPR staff provided complete building department plan review services of the Community Clinic project on behalf of the City of Richmond. This project included construction of a three-story, Community Clinic with a total area of 33,742 SF of medical office space designed to be OSHPD 3 compliant. The building utilized Type VB Construction and included Occupancy Groups B and A-3. The building is fully fire sprinklered. Site improvements included trash enclosures and concrete site walls as part of the project. Plan review services required review for compliance with all applicable OSHPD 3 provisions of the California Building Code. BPR staff teleconferenced and/or met with the design team to resolve plan review issues, as needed. BPR Staff: Roger Peterson, Andrew Burke Project Dates: 2017

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
Downtown Commons Tower:

Reference Contact: Anna Tekautz, Supervising Engineer | 916.808.7877 BPR staff provided plan review services for this 16-story, mixed-use tower constructed of cast-in-place reinforced concrete utilizing a code compliant structural concrete shear wall system for lateral support. This architecturally significant state-of-the-art project serves as a center piece for the Downtown Commons community and is located directly adjacent to the new Sacramento Kings Arena. The 16-story, mixed-use tower includes two levels of subterranean parking. The lower three levels above grade include retail space, restaurant space, hotel lobbies, conference rooms, ballrooms, a pool deck, and back-of-house spaces.

The fourth level includes office space. Levels 5 through 10 were designed for hotel use, and Level 11 through 16 will include residential units. BPR’s staff provided progressive plan review services for this project with an expediated schedule on behalf of the City of Sacramento. BPR staff members successfully assisted the city, the design team, and the Owner to implement and execute an aggressive phased permitting schedule, allowing this significant and complicated project to move quickly into construction. BPR Staff: Bill Rodgers, Andrew Burke Project Dates: 2014 - 2017

CITY OF FRESNO
Community Regional Medical Center: 2016-2017
Reference Contact: Brian Leong, Chief Building Official | 559.621.8082 BPR staff members provided plan review services for the Fresno Community Regional Medical Center (CRMC) expansion – a 58-acre, $350 million project comprised of a 5-story, 180,000 SF Medical Office Building and a 5-story Parking Structure with approximately 427,900 SF of parking. BPR’s staff provided complete building department plan review services for the CRMC Medical Office Building and Parking Structure. Submitted Page #18 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
documents were reviewed for compliance with the
applicable provisions of the codes and associated
standards as adopted by the City of Fresno.

The CRMC Medical Office Building was constructed
utilizing structural steel framing supporting
composite concrete over steel decking at the floor
and roof levels. The foundation utilized conventional
spread footings. The lateral force resisting system
was designed to utilize moment resisting steel frames. The exterior cladding for the project included light gauge steel framing supporting anodized aluminum panels and glazing. The Medical Office Building includes occupancy classifications B, S, and I-2.1, and Construction Type IA and is a fully sprinkled building.

The CRMC Parking Structure was constructed utilizing post-tensioned cast-in-place concrete slabs supported by post-tensioned cast-in-place concrete beams, which in turn are supported by conventionally reinforced castin-place concrete columns. The lateral force resisting system consisted of concrete shear walls and concrete moment frames. The exterior cladding was designed to incorporate precast concrete wall panels. BPR Staff:

Roger Peterson, Andrew Burke Project Dates: 2016-2017
The following is a small sampling of projects for which BPR’s staff have provided BUILDING INSPECTION AND STAFFING SERVICES, all building and inspection services were completed within the agreed upon timeframe and within budget:

CITY OF GARDENA
Reference Contact: Greg Tsujiuchi, Community Development Director | 310.217.9526 BPR staff implemented building inspection services to eliminate a three-week inspection backlog. BPR added inspection staff to eliminate the inspection backlog then reduced staff to a level necessary to meet daily inspection service requirements. BPR presently provides Building Official, in-house plan review, Permit Technician, and Building Inspection services for the City. BPR Staff: Mark Berg, Alicia Ventura, Ron Beehler Project Dates: Current

COUNTY OF MADERA
Reference Contact: Matthew Treber, Chief of Development Services | 559.675.7821 BPR provides Building Official, Permit Technician, Building Inspection and plan review services for the County. BPR staff presently provides inspection services utilizing multiple inspection staff allowing the county to meet their significant inspection workload. Immediately upon selection BPR staffed qualified building inspection staff as needed to reduce inspection service overloads and to ensure the county’s commitment to next day inspection services are maintained. BPR also provides Inspector of Record, IOR, services for multiple county sponsored capital improvement projects including ongoing hall of justice and new fire station projects. BPR Staff: Mark Meyers, Stacy Barker, Samantha Barker, Isidoro Zapien, Landon Collins, Ron Beehler Project Dates: Current Page #19 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR

CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
Reference Contact: Bill Robeson, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director | 805.473.5466 BPR staff provides inspection services to address all inspection services for the community utilizing the services of appropriately qualified and certified inspection staff. BPR additionally provides Building Official, Permit Technician and plan review services for the City. Through BPR’s on-site services the City is able to maintain next day inspections for all ongoing construction projects and provide a high level of customer service for the City and project applicants. BPR Staff: Mark Meyers, Samantha Barker, Landon Collins, Ron Beehler Project Dates: Current

TOWN OF YOUNTVILLE
Reference Contact: Steven Rogers, Town Manager | 707.944.8851 BPR staff provides Building Official, plan review, inspection, and code enforcement services for the Town. services to address all services are provided by experienced and appropriately qualified staff.

Through BPR’s on-site services the Town is able to maintain next day inspections for all ongoing construction projects and a high level of customer service for the Town. BPR Staff: Tim Scott, Rick Walters, Bill Rodgers, Mike Zimmer Project Dates: Current

PROJECT MATRIX
CLIENT

SERVICES PROVIDED
Plan
Review Inspection
Permit
Technician
Building
Official
City of Arroyo Grande X X X X
City of Chico X X
City of Clearlake X
City of Gardena X X X X
City of Monterey Park X
City of Placerville X X
City of Rancho Cordova X X X
City of Roseville X X
City of Sacramento X X X
County of Madera X X X X
County of Napa X X
Town of Yountville X X X
Page #20 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR

PUBLIC AGENCY REFERENCES
Over the past 20 years, BPR’s Principals have worked hard to develop a reputation within California for providing top quality, timely, and efficient building safety services in a professional, courteous manner, always in our clients’ best interests by honoring our commitment to provide timely superior services. We believe our best advertisement is references from current and previous clients and we encourage you to contact our client references. Below are references from agencies where we have provided similar services to those requested by the City of Manteca:

City of Sacramento, Community Development Department
Anna Tekautz, Supervising Engineer
300 Richards Boulevard, 3rd Floor, Sacramento, CA 96811 Ph: 916.808.7877 | Email: [email protected] Services Provided: Services included comprehensive building department services for the City of Sacramento including in-house plan review, out-sourced plan review, inspection and permit technician services. In addition, BPR staff provided in-house plan review training for the City of Sacramento plan review staff. Types of projects reviewed and inspected include residential, multi-family, commercial, and multi-story story projects including mid-rise and high-rise projects, institutional projects, industrial projects, retail buildings and medical office buildings.

Staff’s Experience with Client: 2016 - Current
Percentage of Services Provided: 100%
Project Cost: Varied based on City needs and project size Adherence to Budget and Schedule: Services were provided on time and within budget City of Roseville, Development Services Dept., Building Division Jim Mangino, Building Official
311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678
Ph: 916.774.5332 | Email: [email protected]
Services Provided: Services included comprehensive building department services for the City of Roseville which included out-sourced plan review services. Types of projects reviewed and inspected include residential, multifamily, commercial, and multi-story projects including mid-rise projects, industrial projects, retail buildings, parking structures, fire stations, and medical office buildings.

Staff’s Experience with Client: 2008 - Current
Percentage of Services Provided: 100%
Project Cost: Varied based on City needs and project size Adherence to Budget and Schedule: Services were provided on time and within budget Page #21 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
County of Madera
Matthew Treber, Chief of Development Services
200 W. 4th Street, Suite 3100, Madera, CA 93637
Ph: 559.675.7821 | Email: [email protected] Services Provided: BPR Consulting group presently provides building official, out-sourced plan review, building inspection and permit technician services on behalf of the County’s building department. Types of projects plan reviewed and inspected include residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, and retail projects.

Staff’s Experience with Client: 2013 - Current
Percentage of Services Provided: 100%
Project Cost: Varied based on City assignment and project size Adherence to Budget and Schedule: Services were provided on time and within budget City of Rancho Cordova
Joe Cuffe, Building Official
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Ph: 916.851.8866 | Email: [email protected] Services Provided: Services included comprehensive building department services for the City of Rancho Cordova including in-house plan review, out-sourced plan review, inspection, and permit technician services.

Types of projects reviewed and inspected by BPR staff include residential, multi-family, commercial, and multistory projects, industrial projects and retail buildings.

Staff’s Experience with Client: 2014 - Current
Percentage of Services Provided: 100%
Project Cost: Varied based on City needs and project size Adherence to Budget and Schedule: Services were provided on time and within budget Town of Yountville, Community Development Dept., Building Services Steven Rogers, Town Manager
6550 Yount Street, Yountville, CA 94599
Ph: 707.944.8851 | Email: [email protected]
Services Provided: BPR staff provides comprehensive building department services for the Town of Yountville that include in-house building official, out-sourced plan review and inspection services. BPR’s staff manages the Town of Yountville’s Building Department and provides plan review and inspection services for all construction projects in the Town of Yountville. Types of projects reviewed and inspected include residential, multi-family, commercial, hotels, churches, and retail projects.

Staff’s Experience with Client: 2015 - Current
Percentage of Services Provided: 100%
Project Cost: Varied based on City needs and project size Adherence to Budget and Schedule: Services were provided on time and within budget Page #22 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Project Understanding & Approach
BPR understands the City of Manteca is a community of
approximately 80,000 residents and is situated between
Sacramento and San Francisco in San Joaquin County. The City’s Building Safety Division is responsible for the plan review and inspection of both commercial and residential construction projects within city limits. It is the goal of the Division, which is part of the Development Services Department, to create a safe, beautiful City where the environment is protected, where it is a good place to do business, where citizens are involved and all construction projects are completed in adherence to applicable State and local ordinances and laws.

In an effort to carry out these goals and to ensure a high level of customer service and efficient response times for department services, we understand the City intends to contract with outside consulting firms to assist by providing as needed Plan Review, Inspection and other Building Department support services.

Providing timely and efficient Building Department services to public agencies throughout California is BPR’s primary focus and expertise. We have a team of experienced and appropriately licensed professionals available to support the City and are interested in providing the requested services.

From the RFP, we understand that there are two key tasks that the City requesting On-Call Building Department Staffing:
• BPR will provide the City with qualified, appropriately licensed and certified staff to include building inspectors, permit technicians, deputy building officials and on-site plans examiners / engineers on an on-call, as-need basis.
• Upon notification from the City, BPR will select appropriately qualified staff for interim staffing positions within one business day and full-time staff within two business days. For requests with less than a 24-hour notice, BPR will make every effort to secure suitable candidates.

Plan Review Services:
• BPR’s plans examination staff and/or engineers will review plans and supporting documents submitted to the City for projects requesting Building Permits.
• All projects will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable State Building Codes and local ordinances.
• After the initial review, if plans are found to be in substantial compliance, the plans and documents will be stamped as reviewed and accepted for construction. If corrections are needed, BPR plans examiners will prepare a detailed correction letter identifying specific code violations, code sections in conflict, plan sheet and detail number, as appropriate, outlining the necessary corrections for plan approval.

Our plan review letter will include the name, desk phone number, and email address for each plans examiner making comments related to the specific project. After corrections are made and the plans Page #23 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
and supporting documents are deemed acceptable for permit issuance, BPR will stamp the plans with our plan review stamps.
• We understand the City is requesting the following maximum turn-around time frames:

Type of Project First Submittal Subsequent
Commercial (new building or addition) 15 working days 5 working days Tenant Infill, Remodel, etc. 8 working days 3 working days Residential (new building or master plan) 10 working days 5 working days Residential Addition, Remodel, Patio, etc. 8 working days 3 working days Understanding the City’s Building Safety Division
BPR staff is experienced in working with public agencies throughout California and we are able to quickly and seamlessly fit into each client’s organization. Staff assigned to serve the City of Manteca will become familiar with the City’s Building Safety Division and its responsibilities, which we understand to include:
• Regulating and implementing building standards with regard to public health, safety, and accessibility with the City of Manteca while maintaining and overseeing compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
• Serving as a “one-stop” permit processing operation where application review is coordinated with other city departments including Development Services, Public Works, Planning and Fire. • Process commercial and residential building permits for a variety of project types. • Calculate accurate development fees and building permits for submitted building permit applications. • Conduct timely plan reviews for each submitted project to ensure compliance with applicable State Building Codes and local ordinances.
• Schedule and perform building inspections at multiple points of progress to verify compliance with the approved plans.
• Investigate complaints and issue notices of violation as necessary as it relates to work without permits, illegal work, and non-permitted structures.
• Assist residents, contractors, and developers through the plan review, permitting, and construction process and provide answers to construction related questions.

Page #24 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
BPR’s proposed staff is experienced in providing these same services to multiple public agencies and is prepared and qualified to serve the City Manteca. Additional details on how BPR will provide the requested services can be found below.

BUILDING DEPARTMENT SERVICES

PLAN REVIEW
BPR’s staff possesses significant technical capabilities in all areas of plans examination competency gained from years of experience providing these same services. All plans examiners are California Licensed Engineers or ICC Certified Plans Examiners with multiple years of experience providing plan review services. Our staff will conduct accelerated or project-specific phased plan reviews on an as-needed basis as requested by clients.

Plans examiners will provide comprehensive plan review services to the city, in-house and/or remote, and review submitted project documents for compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local codes and ordinances. Disciplines will include, and are not limited to Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical, Green Building, Energy Conservation, Geotechnical and Structural.

Our plans examiners have a thorough understanding of code requirements, are able to read, understand and interpret construction documents, energy calculations, geotechnical reports, structural calculations, electrical load calculations, commissioning reports, and other associated design documents. Our plans examination staff have the ability to prepare well-written plan review letters, communicate effectively orally and in writing and work effectively with jurisdiction staff, project design teams, contractors and permit applicants. Our plans examiners possess knowledge of the most current state adopted building standards.

Architectural
BPR’s non-structural plans examiners have provided plan review services for a vast array of projects including large residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, retail, and OSHPD 2, 3 and 5 medical office buildings.

Many of our plans examiners are CASp certified. Completed plan review projects range from single-story residential projects to complex high-rise commercial buildings and numerous building additions and remodels.

We are experienced and familiar with the use and application of the most current editions of the following model codes:
 California Building Standards Code
(Title 24) Parts 1 through 6 and 9
 International Building Code (IBC)
 Americans with Disabilities Act
Standards for Accessible Design
 ANSI Standards
 NFPA Codes & Standards
 CA Code of Regulations (CCR) Titles 19 and 25
 Jurisdiction-Adopted Amendments or Ordinances
 CA Existing Building Code
 CA Historical Building Code
Page #25 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Structural
Our structural engineers have experience designing and reviewing building projects subjected to the significant seismic loads necessitated by the geographic location of the City of Manteca. Our structural engineers have reviewed all types of projects including residential, multi-family, commercial, and multi-story projects including mid-rise and high-rise projects, institutional projects, industrial projects, retail buildings, schools, medical office buildings and court facilities.

Our structural engineers have experience designing and reviewing projects constructed with all building materials including the following:
 Wood
 Reinforced Masonry
 Heavy Timber / Timber Frame / CLT
 Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete
 Stressed Skin Panels
 Structural Steel
 Light Gauge Steel Framing
 Straw Bale
 Rammed Earth
 Insulated Concrete Forms, (ICF)
Our engineers have designed or reviewed a wide array of structural lateral force resisting systems including:
 Structural steel moment frames
 Buckling-restrained braced frames
 Eccentric braced frames
 Concentric braced frames
 Concrete moment frames
 Wood shear wall systems
 Masonry shear wall systems
 Concrete shear wall systems
 Cantilevered column systems
 Pre-stressed and post-Tensioned Concrete
 Various proprietary lateral force resisting
systems
Our structural engineers and inspectors are experienced with the provisions of most model codes including current versions of:
 CCR Title 24, Part 2, Volumes 2 & 2.5
 International Building Code (IBC)
 AISC 341, 358 and 360
 ASCE 7
 ASCE 41
 AISI Standards for Cold Formed Steel
 ANSI / AF&PA NDS for wood framing
 ACI 318
 ACI 530 / TMS 402/602
 CA Historic Building Codes
 CA Existing Building Codes
 NEHRP
Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical
BPR’s Mechanical and Electrical Engineers are well versed in the California Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical codes. We will review submitted design documents to ensure compliance to the current edition of the following codes:
 California Building Code
 California Residential Code
 California Plumbing Code
 California Mechanical Code
 California Electrical Code
 Jurisdiction-adopted amendments
Page #26 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Specialty plan review services may be provided utilizing the most current editions of national standards including the following:
 International Building Code
 International Residential Code
 International Mechanical Code
 International Plumbing Code
 NFPA Standards 13 (automatic fire
sprinkler systems)
 NFPA Standards 20 (fire pumps)
 NFPA Standards 72 (fire alarms)
 NFPA Standards 99 (medical gases)
 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code
 NEHRP Requirements for Existing Building
Energy Compliance
Our engineers and plans examiners are up to date on all California Energy Code requirements as they relate to both new and remodel construction for all project types. Our staff have experience verifying CA Energy Code requirements for projects located within all climate zones. The Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non-Residential Buildings were established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. These standards have been updated since that time to address a multitude of building components, systems and equipment with the goal of having new and updated buildings be more energy efficient, comfortable for building occupants, and less reliant of fossil fuels.

Green Building Standards
BPR’s staff has a working knowledge of the proper incorporation of CALGreen building criteria into project designs and the resulting potential impact of these standards related to building code compliance and the environment. Our plans examiners will review project documents to verify compliance with adopted Green Building Code Standards as required by state law and local amendments and ordinances.

LEED
Developed by the US Green Building Council (USGBC), LEED provides building owners and operators a framework for identifying and implementing measurable green building design methodologies, construction, operations, and building maintenance. LEED certification consists of a variety of rating systems applicable to multiple building types including commercial as well as residential. Ratings reflect a measure of how well a building performs across many sustainability metrics including: energy savings, water efficiency, CO2 emissions reduction, indoor environmental quality, energy usage and the projects impact on the local environment.

Page #27 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Access Compliance & CASp Review
All BPR CASp-certified professionals are knowledgeable of state and federal accessibility laws and regulations and possess the expertise necessary to promote access to facilities for persons with disabilities. Our staff are experts in the industry, maintaining appropriate certifications demonstrating their expertise, and are experienced providing services for building departments in a seamless manner balanced and in coordination with our client’s expectations and needs. We work collaboratively with our clients to address accessibility plan review and inspection related issues as efficiently as possible.

Our plans examiners are fully trained and familiar with CA Building Code Accessibility requirements and ADA compliance requirements and are available for plan review and/or inspection services. We offer support to municipalities for compliance enforcement and/or developing transition plans. We can assist our clients in researching and providing interpretations of various specific issues related to access compliance including access compliance obligation, transition plan development, construction costs and phasing, and regulation interpretations.

Flood Zones
BPR’s staff of engineers and plans examiners have experience in providing plan reviews for projects located in FEMA designated flood zones and areas prone to flooding. BPR Consulting Group’s staff has provided numerous plan reviews for projects located in flood zones using FEMA’s Technical Bulletins as well as locally adopted ordinances. Additionally, members of our team have participated in state-sponsored committees to establish guideline and building code requirements for projects planned in areas designated as flood zones.

OSHPD 2, 3 & 5
BPR Consulting Group’s staff of plans examiners and building inspectors have extensive experience providing plan review and inspection services for OSHPD 2, 3 and 5 projects. Our staff is well versed with the OSHPD 2, 3 and 5 requirements included in the California Building Code. Our inspection staff has recent experience providing inspection services for hemodialysis, outpatient surgery, hyperbolic chamber, medical clinics and acute psychiatric facilities.

Fire Code Plan Reviews
We have an experienced and licensed professional Fire Protection Engineer on staff to address your fire and life safety needs. If requested, our fire safety plan review and inspection staff can quickly and accurately check plans for compliance with applicable fire codes and standards. Our fire protection staff routinely review and inspect projects for compliance with fire and life safety regulations.

Our Fire Plans Examiners and Inspectors have extensive experience in the use and application of the following model codes, standards, and regulations:
 California Fire Code (CFC) and California Building Code (CBC), with local amendments and regulations.

Page #28 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
 Adopted National Fire Protection Standards
 California Health and Safety Code
 Appropriate listings (CSFM, U.L., etc.) for common systems and materials  Fire Department Standards
 Municipal, State or Federal regulations enforced by local Fire Agencies  NFPA Standards 13 (automatic fire sprinkler systems
 NFPA Standards 14 (standpipes)
 NFPA Standards 20 (fire pumps)
 NFPA Standards 72 (fire alarms)
 NFPA Standards 96 (smoke control)
 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code
BPR’s staff is active with California Fire Prevention Officer’s Association, as well as local chapters of International Code Council Building Officials Organizations throughout the State of California.

On-Site Consultant Services & Meeting Attendance
Our plan review staff is available for pre-construction or pre-design meetings, field visits, contacts with the
design team, and support for field inspection personnel as needed. We understand, fully grasp, and utilize the
efficiency afforded by the many electronic meeting
platforms that have become available in recent years.

We find electronic meeting platforms such as Microsoft
Teams, Zoom, and others allow for efficient and
constructive communication between parties located
throughout the United States and are an efficient tool for resolution of challenging issues both during plan review and field inspections. Our staff is available to meet with the City, project applicants and their design teams either in person or via electronic platform to resolve plan review issues efficiently and collaboratively.

Customer Service | Responsiveness
BPR’s staff is always available and willing to discuss plan review issues for projects that we have reviewed with Building Division staff, applicants, designers and contractors via in-person or electronic meetings, telephone, or e-mail as required to resolve plan review related issues. We maintain Microsoft Teams, Zoom and GoToMeeting accounts to foster efficient communication with project proponents regardless of their physical location. Voice mails and e-mails will be responded to the same day they are received, if possible, always within 24 hours.

BPR’s staff when not available immediately, will respond within one business day to questions from the Building Official or inspection staff which may be generated during field inspections of projects which were reviewed by BPR staff.

Page #29 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Electronic Document Review
BPR’s staff are thoroughly experienced providing
electronic plan review and will perform electronic plan reviews as requested by the City using a format that is acceptable to the City. BPR will comply with the City’s established policies and procedures for electronic plan reviews. BPR maintains an efficient cloud-based,
electronic-document, submittal system for receiving and sending large electronic document files. Our electronic document portal utilizes a SharePoint system to allow
permit applicants and client staff the ability to upload construction documents for our plan review services.

BPR Consulting Group has provided electronic plan review services, serving building departments and other public agencies with efficient electronic plan review services. We are prepared to provide electronic plan check services for your community utilizing our Bluebeam electronic plan review system, or any electronic plan review system presently used by your department.

We have had the opportunity to work with many different electronic plan review systems and our preferred system is Bluebeam, an industry-leading software used by many jurisdictions, design teams and contractors to review and annotate construction documents. We have worked with multiple clients to purchase and deploy Bluebeam software, develop jurisdiction-specific stamps, develop tools to increase efficiencies for electronic plan reviews, and participate and provide ongoing training on the use of the software.

Transporting Plans
For paper submittal documents, we will arrange for all pick-up and delivery of the plan review documents from your office at no additional cost. We utilize specific methods for project document pick-up and delivery with the goal of providing same-day service.

Communicating Plan Review Results
Plan review comments, when necessary, will be type written and refer to specific details, drawing or supporting document, and reference applicable code sections. BPR will provide a clear, concise, and thorough plan review letter itemized by specific discipline such as life safety, accessibility, structural, plumbing, mechanical, etc., that can be utilized by clients, designers, contractors, and owners to understand the noted deficiencies and make necessary corrections to the project documents. At the completion of each plan review cycle, BPR Consulting Group will return a copy of the plan review comment list to the designated applicant and project representative.

If requested, we will coordinate plan review re-checks directly with the designated project applicant. Upon completion of the plan review process, we will return completed plan review documents, in either hard copy or electronic format as needed, bearing BPR’s plan review stamps and ready for final approval and permit issuance by the jurisdiction.

Page #30 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
Standard Plan Review Completion Timeframes
We complete all plan reviews within the timeframes as requested from our clients. We understand the City of Manteca has the following timeframes established which we are able to accommodate. We can provide expedited plan review services when requested.

Type of Project First Submittal Subsequent
Commercial (new building or addition) 12 working days 5 working days Tenant Infill, Remodel, etc. 8 working days 3 working days Residential (new building or master plan) 10 working days 5 working days Residential Addition, Remodel, Patio, etc. 8 working days 3 working days

BUILDING INSPECTION
BPR maintains the staffing and ability to provide experienced and qualified building inspectors who are appropriately ICC-certified to provide the requested inspection services.

Our inspection staff will perform inspection services to verify that the work of construction is in conformance with the approved project construction documents as well as identifying issues of non-compliance with applicable building codes. Our field inspection services will include inspection of all portions of projects including project sites as applicable. Our building inspectors will write legible and understandable correction notices and field reports, and will be available to answer in-person, emailed, or telephone inquiries. All inspection personnel assigned will be ICC and/or CASp certified as required.

We understand that many municipalities have amended code sections, policies and ordinances that impact the work that is inspected and shown on approved project plans. Our inspection staff will familiarize themselves with local requirements to ensure that the projects we are inspecting are compliant with local and current code requirements. Specifically, our inspectors will ensure compliance with the applicable provisions of the Title 24 California Building Standards Code, Parts 1 through 12, covering structural, fire prevention, life safety, disabled access, energy conservation, green building, plumbing, mechanical and
electrical installations in residential, commercial, industrial, existing and historical buildings.

BPR’s ICC/CASp certified inspectors have performed building inspection services on a wide variety of construction projects including master planned developments, single-family production, custom homes, commercial, manufacturing, institutional, assembly, essential service, industrial projects and historically designated buildings. When necessary for large or fast-paced projects, multiple inspectors can be made available. BPR’s inspectors will inspect projects to verify conformance with approved project drawings and specifications which will include review of the permit documents to verify that onsite conditions are consistent Page #31 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
with the approved documents for size, setbacks, heights and other applicable requirements. At the completion of inspections, BPR’s inspectors will update database information and complete necessary forms and documents as required to provide seamless service.

Inspector Qualifications & Certifications: BPR will work with the City of Manteca to select appropriately qualified inspectors with applicable experience and specific code knowledge based on the types of projects assigned for inspection. All BPR inspectors are ICC-certified, with many maintaining CASp certification. In addition, BPR employs OSHPD certified inspectors available for inspection of OSHPD designated facilities.

Qualified inspectors having experience with inspection of new, existing and historical buildings/sites, building code enforcement, will be assigned as appropriate.

Inspection personnel will have the ability to read, understand and interpret construction plans, truss drawings and calculations, prepare and maintain accurate records and reports, communicate effectively orally and in writing and to work effectively with contractors, permit applicants, homeowners and agency staff. Inspectors will possess knowledge of approved and modern methods, materials, tools and safety used in building inspection and the most current building and fire standards. Our inspectors are familiar with most of the common scheduling and tracking systems utilized by building departments and can quickly adapt to your systems and requirements.

DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL SERVICES
BPR Consulting Group provides Building Official services for multiple California communities. Our Building Officials possess experience and are knowledgeable of the laws and regulations associated with building department operations and will use this experience and knowledge to promote efficient services for the City of Manteca. Our Building Officials are keenly aware of the importance an efficient and predictable building department has on the economic vitality of the communities we serve. We will provide Deputy Building Official candidates to serve the City of Manteca who have the necessary qualifications and experience for each specific Deputy Building Official assignment.

PERMIT TECHNICIAN SERVICES
Knowledgeable and personable permit technicians are the first impression the public gets of your Building Division, and they play a critical role as to how your departments services are perceived. Permit technician and office support services are crucial to the success of the entire building safety workflow within building departments. The ability to convey proper information to permit applicants, properly calculate permit fees, properly route plans to various departments for review, tracking approvals, database management and permit issuance are all critical to the success of your building department. We understand that the ability to deliver excellent customer service, maintain a smooth flow of permit documents throughout departments, and maintaining accurate and up-to-date records, are all key elements to furnishing first-rate, efficient success of your Building Division.

Our Permit Technicians and office support staff will greet and work closely with customers at the public counter or via telephone, answering questions and providing accurate information. Our Permit Technicians will provide information about permit applications, plan review and inspection requirements, will be organized and have the ability to maintain filing systems necessary for tracking permit applications, permits issued, plan checks in progress, approved project documents and any other records or information important to the efficient operation of your department.

Page #32 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
CHAPTER 4

PROPOSAL EXCEPTIONS
BPR Consulting Group has reviewed the City’s Sample Agreement for Services and we do not have any issues or exceptions for requested changes.

Page #33 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
CHAPTER 5

PROPOSAL COSTS SHEET AND RATES
PLAN REVIEW SERVICES: For plan review services provided on a fixed fee basis, we propose the following:
• For complete plan review services, reviewed in either hard copy or electronic format, we propose a fixed fee equal to 65% of the plan review fee charged by the City as per the City’s adopted fee schedule.
• For partial plan review services which will include review of the MEP, Energy and Green Building portions of a project for code compliance, we propose a fixed fee equal to 25% of the plan review fee charged by the City per the City’s adopted fee schedule. • For streamlined residential solar reviews we propose a fixed fee of 65% of the plan review fee charged by the City per the City’s adopted fee schedule.

Plan review services for fixed fee plan reviews will include an initial first review and up to two back check reviews of the plans. Any additional plan review services required beyond the second review will be billed at our hourly rates listed within the table shown below.

For partial reviews such as foundation only, structural only, life safety only, preliminary reviews, or others, we propose to provide services on an hourly basis using the rates listed in the table shown below.

BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFFING: Inspection services, permit technician and building official services, when requested, will be provided at the hourly rates listed in the table shown.

SERVICE PROPOSED RATE
Plan Review
Complete Plan Review 65% of fee
MEP, Energy and Green Review 25% of fee
Licensed Structural Engineer Plans Examiner (Hourly) $135 Licensed Engineer Plans Examiner (civil, electrical, mechanical) (Hourly) $130 Non-Structural Review (Hourly) $105
Per Streamlined Residential Solar Review 65% of fee
Fire Protection Engineer (Hourly) $135
ICC Fire Plans Examiner (Hourly) $105
Building Department Staffing – Hourly Fees
ICC Building Inspector I $90
ICC Building Inspector II $105
ICC Senior Building Inspector $120
ICC Fire Inspector $105
ICC Deputy Building Official $135
CASp Inspector $110
ICC Permit Technician $75
Permit Technician Trainee/ Building Department Administrative Staff $50 Overtime (hourly) 140%
Page #34 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR
 Shipping: There is no charge for courier or shipping services for plan reviews conducted off site.  Overtime: Inspection services and other hourly services provided in the Building Department, in excess of eight hours per day, nights, and weekends will be charged at 140% of the billing rates indicated above.
 Expedited Plan Reviews: Expedited plan reviews can be provided upon request. Fees for expedited plan review services will be 145% of the above noted fixed fees or hourly rates.  Mileage: Vehicle mileage utilized in the performance of inspection services will be billed at the current IRS vehicle mileage rate.
 Minimum Daily Charge: There will be a minimum 8-hour daily charge for all staffing services provided in City offices.

Page #35 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF MANTECA
BUILDING SAFETY | PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES
BPR

APPENDIX
• Proposer’s Information Form/RFP’s attachment A
• Resumes
Page #36 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2 City of Manteca – RFP for Professional Services
Attachment A
Proposer’s Information Form
PROPOSER (please print):

ADDENDA
To assure that all Proposers have received each addendum, check the appropriate box(es) below.

Failure to acknowledge receipt of an addendum/addenda may be considered an irregularity in the Proposal:

Addendum number(s) received: �1; � 2; �3; �4; �5; �6;
Or, _____ _____No Addendum/Addenda Were Received (check and initial).

PROPOSER’S SIGNATURE
No proposal shall be accepted which has not been signed in ink in the appropriate space below:

BPR Consulting Group
2201 Francisco Drive, Suite 140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
916.562.3600 [email protected]
Ron Beehler, Principal-in-Charge
916.204.3178 | [email protected]
X
2021
CA
2021
X RB
Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

1. If Proposer is INDIVIDUAL, sign here
Date:______________ _____________________________________ Proposer’s Signature
_____________________________________
Proposer’s typed name and title

3. If Proposer is a CORPORATION, the duly authorized officer shall sign as follows:

The undersigned certify that he/she is respectively:
_________________________________ and _____ Principa _______l-in- ________ Charg_______ e Signature Title
Of the corporation named below; that they are designated to sign the Proposal Cost Form by resolution (attach a certified copy, with corporate seal, if applicable, notarized as to its authenticity or Secretary’s certificate of authorization) for and on behalf of the below named CORPORATION, and that they are authorized to execute same for and on behalf of said CORPORATION.

BPR Consulting Group
By:_____ Ron Beeh ________le_________________________ r Date: __4/24/202 _______________ 2 Title:_____ Principa _______l-in- _______ Charg _______________________ e Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 Graduate Coursework in Structural &
Geotechnical Engineering, California
State University, Sacramento
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Chico
 AA, Physical Science, Butte College,
Oroville, CA

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-3632
 CA Civil Engineer CE-39404
 NV Structural Engineer
SE-019992
 NV Civil Engineer CE-019992
 National Earthquake Hazard
Reduction Program Training
 CA Construction Law Training
International Code Council - 801789
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Building Inspector

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 San Joaquin ICC Chapter of Building
Officials – Past President
 Napa Solano ICC Chapter – Past
President
 Sacramento Valley Association of
Building Officials – Multiple Term
Board of Directors Member
 CALBO Building and Fire Advisory
Committee – Appointed Member
 CALBO Structural Committee –
Appointed Member

RON BEEHLER, SE, CBO

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
Ron utilizes experience gained through more than 35 years of hands-on experience performing life safety, accessibility, and structural plan reviews to successfully manage building departments, building department services and high-profile building projects on behalf of public agencies throughout California. His experience includes establishing and coordinating on-site building department services for large, multi-building projects and unique, fast-paced development projects. Ron has served as Chief Building Official for multiple California public agencies including interim assignments. He has also provided building department assessments on behalf of municipal clients to identify inefficiencies and implement best practice improvements.

Licensed as a Civil and Structural Engineer in California and Nevada, certified by the International Code Council as a Building Official, Code Specialist, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector, Ron is uniquely qualified to evaluate and manage all building department services. His background includes the position of Chief Building Official with the City of Sacramento directing a staff of 120 engineers, plan reviewers and building inspectors, Chief of Engineering Design and Construction for the California National Guard and Senior Structural Engineer with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD).

Ron is dedicated to maintaining his knowledge of California building codes, laws and regulations related to building department operations. He frequently lectures and presents classes on technical topics on behalf of professional organizations including CALBO and multiple International Code Council Chapters throughout California and other western states.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Principal | Director of Operations | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Ron manages client plan review and inspection services on behalf of BPR Consulting Group providing efficient services on behalf of multiple municipal clients.

Director, Building Safety Services | Interwest Consulting Group | 2006 – 2021
Ron provided direct oversight of all Building Safety Services including coordination of all plan review and building inspection services, ensuring timely and responsive services. He worked with building officials for fullservice clients to insure timely and efficient services. Ron also managed and provided direct oversight of plan review and inspection services for large, complicated and fast-paced projects on behalf of public agency clients.

Chief Building Official | City of Sacramento | 2003 – 2006 Ron planned, directed, and managed activities for a 120-person building department with oversight responsibilities for construction inspections and plan review of 18,000 permitted projects annually. He planned, organized, Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Ron Beehler, SE, CBO – Principal-in-Charge
BPR
administered, and evaluated staff work. Other duties included report writing and presentations to community groups, city council and professional organizations, and planning and administering a budget of $13.6 million.

Supervising Engineer | Building Inspection Division | City of Sacramento | 2002 – 2003 Ron supervised plan review, managed plan intake and public counter functions for two regional permit centers, trained and mentored staff, met with architects and engineers to resolve building code related issues, coordinated plan review for high profile projects, and worked with field inspection supervisors and inspectors.

Regional Compliance Officer, Senior Structural Engineer | CA State Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development | 1998 – 2002
Ron supervised regional hospital inspection program coordinating field inspection staff and approval of special inspection issues. He resolved complicated code related inspection issues, and reviewed plans, specifications, and structural calculations for healthcare facilities. Ron consulted with architects and engineers to resolve complex code interpretation issues. He researched and investigated structural adequacy of building materials and manufactured products, and verified proper loads, forces, and materials for the design of buildings and equipment anchorage.

Chief of Facilities Engineering | California National Guard | 1991 – 1998 Ron supervised and planned work for engineering design and project inspection staff, developed scope and budgets for projects, directed preparation of plans from preliminary design through working drawings, coordinated and approved project specifications and cost estimates, negotiated and approved project changes, coordinated inspection activities, resolved inspection disputes, represented National Guard/Military Department at public meetings, conducted plan review for projects designed by consultants, and presented design concepts and final designs.

Associate Structural Engineer | CA State Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development | 1987 – 1991
Ron reviewed construction plans and specifications for new hospitals and skilled nursing facilities for California Building Code and UBC requirements, met with architects and engineers to resolve plan review issues, reviewed field changes, investigated, and resolved construction conflicts and other administrative duties.

Associate Engineer Architect | Sacramento County Building Department | 1983 – 1987 Ron reviewed construction plans and specifications, and structural calculations for building code compliance, reviewed plans for residential, multi-residential, commercial, and industrial structures, and met with designers to resolve code issues related to commercial and residential structures.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Sacramento

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-4198
 CA Civil Engineer CE-50673
 NV Structural Engineer SE-18427
 NV Civil Engineer CE-18427

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 Structural Engineers Association,
Northern California (SEAONC)

BILL RODGERS, SE

PROJECT MANAGER / STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
Bill has more than 30 years of experience in the field of structural engineering, including more than 20 years of experience as a plan review engineer. His wealth of experience includes a varied and vast list of projects throughout California and Nevada. Bill is in demand for handson work within jurisdictions due to his great success in blending excellent engineering skills with responsive customer service.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Principal Structural Engineer | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Bill directs client plan review on behalf of BPR Consulting Group providing efficient services on behalf of multiple municipal clients.

Senior Structural Engineer |Plans Examiner | Interwest
Consulting Group | 2006 – 2021
Bill performed structural plan review for commercial and residential construction for municipalities for various state and local agencies throughout California and Nevada. In addition to providing structural plan review services, he was responsible for the production and performance of Interwest offices, including maintaining client relationships. Bill’s duties also included performing structural plan reviews for industrial, commercial, and residential projects.

Senior Structural Engineer | LP2A / Bureau Veritas | 2001 - 2006 Bill performed structural plan review for commercial and residential construction for municipalities for various state and local agencies throughout California and Nevada Structural Engineer| Associate | DES Architects + Engineers | 1995 – 2001 Bill was responsible for the structural design of many projects throughout the Bay Area, including Pacific Shores Center in Redwood City, Moffett Corners in Sunnyvale, Carlmont High School in Belmont, and many other projects. Additionally, Bill oversaw the structural department of this architecture and engineering firm and was responsible for staff development and work quality.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Project Manager/Structural Engineer | Judicial Council of California | State of California | 2010 – 2021
Bill provided project management and structural plan review services for new court buildings and court building upgrades throughout California. Most recently he provided services for upgrades to the Sonora courthouse, the new courthouse in Modesto and the new eighteen-story high-rise Sacramento Criminal Courthouse.

Project Manager/Structural Engineer | Division of State Architect | State of California | 2016 – 2021
Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Bill Rodgers, SE, Plan Review Manager/Structural Plan Review BPR
Bill provided project management and structural plan review services for new school buildings and school upgrades throughout California. Recent projects include Westmore Oaks Elementary School, Santa Maria High School and El Camino College District, New Behavioral Health and Social Science Building.

Project Manager/Structural Engineer | University of California, Merced | 2020 Campus Expansion | 2017 – 2021
Bill ensured all plan reviews were completed within the agreed upon timeframes by leading weekly conference calls with the plan review and onsite team and regularly visiting the project site. Additionally, Bill provided structural plan review services for this expansive project.

Project Manager/Structural Engineer | City of Berkeley | Berkeley, CA | 2008 – 2021 Bill ensured all plan review services for the City of Berkeley were accurate and completed in a timely manner.

Project Manager/Structural Engineer | Downtown Commons Tower | Sacramento, CA | 2016 – 2019
Bill served as the project manager for the plan review of this new 634,357 gross SF, 16-story, mixed-use tower located adjacent to the new Sacramento Kings Arena. The tower included office space for the team and area management, a 250-room hotel, 44-residential units and below grade parking.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Civil Engineering, University of
Wyoming

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
& CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-3846
 CA Civil Engineer CE-46096
 ID Structural Engineer SE-8225
 ID Civil Engineer CE-8225
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
 Structural Engineers Association of
Northern California (SEAONC)

ROGER PETERSON, SE

PLAN REVIEW MANAGER / STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW
With more than 34 years of experience in structural design and plan review, Roger brings considerable depth and knowledge to any project. Roger is a California Registered Structural and Civil Engineer who has designed and provided plan review services for multi-story steel and concrete-framed buildings, as well as one-story structures utilizing steel, concrete, timber, and masonry framing systems. His design experience includes schools, commercial and industrial projects, micro-chip production facilities, power plant installations and multi-family residential projects. Roger's expertise contributes to the success and safety of all projects.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Principal | Structural Engineer | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Roger directs client plan review on behalf of BPR Consulting Group providing efficient services on behalf of multiple municipal clients.

Senior Structural Engineer | Project Manager | Interwest Consulting Group | 2006 – 2021
Roger provided management for several of Interwest’s offices and special projects as well as performed structural plan review for commercial and residential construction for municipalities for various state and local agencies throughout California. In addition to providing structural plan review services, Roger was responsible for the production and performance of Interwest offices, including maintaining client relationships. His duties also included performing structural plan reviews for industrial, commercial, and residential projects.

Senior Structural Engineer | Plans Examiner | Branch Manager LP2A | Bureau Veritas | CA | 1999 - 2006
Roger served as branch manager and lead structural plan reviewer for the Sacramento Area branch office. He was responsible for the production and performance of office including maintaining client relationships. His duties included performing structural plan reviews for industrial, commercial, and residential projects.

Project Engineer | Power Engineers, Inc. | 1999
Roger was a project design engineer for commercial and industrial-type projects. He provided structural design and construction administration services.

Project Engineer | Office Manager | R2H Engineering, Inc. | 1998 - 1999 Roger was the office manager and project design engineer responsible for the structural design of commercial projects.

Project Engineer | Rutherford & Chekene | 1995 - 1998
Roger was responsible for providing design and detailing for commercial and industrial type projects, including numerous projects in the micro-chip industry.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Roger Peterson, SE, Structural Plan Review
BPR
Design Engineer | Project Engineer | DES Engineers & Architects | 1997 - 1995 Roger provided engineering design and detailing for commercial, institutional, corporate and residential building projects using wood, steel, concrete and masonry building materials.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Project Manager | Structural Engineer | Hollywood Park | Inglewood, CA | 2018 – 2021 Roger provided plan review services for this new, mixed-use development which included retail and office space with associated parking encompassing 28.5 acres.

Project Manager | Structural Engineer | Nasa Ames Research Center | Moffett Field, CA | 2018 Roger provided structural plan review and project management of this 1.2 million square-foot development comprised of office, research, and development space.

Project Manager | Structural Engineer | Monterey Park Hotel & Residence | Monterey Park, CA | 2017 – 2021
Roger provided plan review services and project management for this new, mixed-use hotel, condominium, and restaurant podium type building.

Project Manager |Structural Engineer | Hatchet Ridge Wind Farm | Shasta County, CA | 2009 - 2010
Roger provided project management, structural plan review and field inspections for this 101.2 MW power generating facility that consists of 44 – 2.3 MW wind turbines constructed along 9 miles of the ridge line on Hatchet Ridge near Burney, CA.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 BSME, California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
 Credentialed Instructor, Los Rios
Community College District
Campuses: Cosumnes River College,
Folsom Lake College, & Sacramento
City College

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Registered Mechanical Engineer,
31455
 CA Registered Fire Protection
Engineer, 2013
 Certificate Fire Protection
Engineering | University of California
Davis Extension
 Certificate in HVAC and Refrigeration
| University of California Davis
Extension
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
 American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating & Air Conditioning
Engineers
 American Society of Mechanical
Engineers
 National Fire Protection Association
 American Society of Plumbing
Engineers

DAVID CASTILLO, ME, FPE

MECHANICAL ENGINEER / FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER
David brings more than 30 years of breadth, depth, and knowledge of mechanical engineering, design, and plan review to any project. A California licensed professional Mechanical Engineer and Fire Protection Engineer, his expertise encompasses HVAC, Plumbing, Medical Gases, and Fire Sprinklers.

David’s background includes mechanical engineering, design, and plan review on Central Treatment Centers, Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities, Inpatient Mental Health Clinics, and Inmate Housing Units for the Department of Corrections. He has engineered and designed Acute Care Hospitals, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Surgery Clinics, Psychiatric Hospitals, Pharmaceutical Plants, Industrial Plants, Educational Facilities, and Hi-Rise Commercial Buildings.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Senior Plan Review Engineer | BPR Consulting Group |
2021 – Present
David performs mechanical engineering and fire protection engineering plan review services for BRP’s California clients.

Senior Plan Review Engineer | Interwest Consulting Group | 2012 - 2021
David performed mechanical engineering and fire protection engineering plan review services for Interwest’s California clients.

Senior Mechanical Engineer | State of California, OSHPD Group | 2001 - 2012
David performed plan checking of mechanical systems for hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and surgery centers to ensure code compliance with the CBC, CMC, CPC and NFPA.

Vice President | Technical Engineering Group, Inc. | 2000 - 2001 David responsibilities included acquiring new clients, maintaining existing clients and preparing proposals. He performed heating and cooling load calculations, laid out mechanical designs for central plant systems, chilled water systems, heating hot water systems and variable air volume systems for hospitals, prisons, and educational facilities. David performed in-house plan check of all projects, and served as the Engineer of Record for all projects. He is knowledgeable of CMC, CPC, CBC, NFPA and OSHPD.

Project Manager / Lead Mechanical Engineer | Mazzetti & Associates | 1999 - 2000 David provided project management for all aspects of mechanical design on prisons, hospitals, pharmaceutical facilities, and office buildings. He was familiar with cGMP and all classes of clean rooms related to manufacturing facilities.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Dave Castillo, ME, FPE, Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing Plan Review BPR
Project Manager / Lead Mechanical Engineer | Interface Engineering, Inc. / 1997 - 1999 David was the lead engineer for the Mechanical Division of a Mechanical/Electrical engineering firm. He initiated and implemented the writing of a Project Management Procedures Manual for companywide use. David performed heating and cooling load calculations, layout of mechanical designs for central plant systems, chilled water systems, heating hot water systems, variable air volume systems, and write specifications.

Mechanical Designer | Edward Rios & Associates | 1994 - 1997 David was responsible for all aspects of HVAC, process piping and plumbing design and drafting for a mechanical engineering firm. He performed heating and cooling load calculations using Trane Trace analysis software.

Mechanical Designer | The Spink Corporation | 1991 - 1994 David was responsible for all plumbing and process piping design and drafting for the Mechanical Division of a 115-person multidisciplinary engineering firm. Drafting was done using AutoCAD Release 11. David’s primary responsibilities included running HVAC loads using Trane “Load 600” analysis program, Title 24 compliance, and field work for remodel/rehabilitation projects.

Mechanical Designer / Estimator | Mark III Engineering Contractors | 1986 - 1991 David performed material takeoffs for plumbing and HVAC. He designed HVAC and plumbing for commercial projects. David priced out projects and submitted bids to general contractor. He also served as a project manager for field staff.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Electrical Engineering, California
Polytechnic University

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
& CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Electrical Engineer 12290
 HI Electrical Engineer 13259
 International Association of
Electrical Inspectors – Electrical
Plans Examiner and Electrical
Inspector – 6027880
International Code Council (ICC)
 ICC CA Commercial Building
Inspector
 ICC CA Commercial Mechanical
Inspector
 ICC CA Commercial Plumbing
Inspector
 ICC CA Residential Mechanical
Inspector
 ICC CA Residential Plumbing
Inspector
 ICC Commercial Building Inspector
 ICC Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
 International Association of
Plumbing and Mechanical Officials
 International Association of
Electrical Inspectors
 IEEE

JEROME SCHREIBER, EE

ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
Jerome has more than 40 years of electrical industry experience. He is a licensed electrical engineer in California and Hawaii, and is certified by the International Association of Electrical Inspectors as an Electrical Plans Examiner and Electrical inspector. Jerome’s experience is wide and varied, having provided engineering services to the military, public utilities, private organizations and municipal agencies.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building Inspector | City of Glendale | 2013 -Present
Jerome has served as a Building Inspector for the City of Glendale since August 2013. His duties have included Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, & Electrical Inspections and Plans Examination.

Instructor | Long Beach City College | 2013 -Present
Since 2013, Jerome has served as an instructor in National Electrical Code for Industrial & Commercial Applications at Long Beach City College.

Senior Electrical Inspector | City of Vernon | 1987 -2013 Jerome was responsible for electrical plans examination and performing Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, & Electrical inspections and all electrical installation in the City and for the City municipal facilities.

Electrical Consultant | BSK Engineering | 1986 -1987
Jerome served as an Electrical Consultant for a private firm that provided design for factories, restaurants, computer rooms, car lots, and other such installations.

Distribution Engineer | Southern California Edison | 1983 -1986 Jerome provided service planning and customer coordination for this Southern California utility.

Interior Electrician | Air National Guard | 1978 -1980
Jerome provided electrician services for various installations as a member of the Air National Guard.

Automatic Flight Control Systems Specialist, Sergeant | US Air Force | 1973 -1977
As a Sergeant in the US Air Force, Jerome served as Shift Supervisor and was responsible for repair crew to facilitate maintenance on transient aircraft.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 Victor Valley College Inspection
Technology Certificate
 Pacesetter Schools Building
Inspections Certificate
 Gordon Copper Vocational
Technical School

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
ICC NO. 848507:
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Combination Inspector
 ICC Combination Inspector - Legacy
 ICC Electrical Inspector
 ICC Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
 ICC Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
 ICC Master Electrician (NV)
000-001221
 OSHA 10 & 30 Training
 ATC 20 Post Disaster Training

RICHARD MADDOX, ICC

ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
Richard brings over 25 years of experience in all aspects of plan review and building inspections. Richard provides accurate and complete electrical plan reviews of residential and commercial buildings. While working for Clark County, Richard represented his department for multiple years at all electrical industry events such as IAEI, IEEE, AGC, NEMA, ABC, SNHBA and IBEW. Richard maintains his electrical plan review and inspection skills by regularly participating in industry and code related training and attending electrical safety and electrical industry symposiums

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Electrical Plan Review  BPR Consulting Group  2021 –
Present
Richard provides electrical plan reviews for residential and commercial projects for compliance with the California Electrical Code, California Energy Code requirements as well as local codes and ordinances.

Building Inspector and Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2013-2021
Provided electrical plan review and inspections for residential and commercial buildings for compliance with California Electrical Code and Energy Code requirements, local codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances.

Supervising Building Inspector, Electrical Specialist | Clark County, Nevada | 2003-2012
Supervised a staff of 15 inspectors. Assisted customers in addressing problems and concerns with compliance issues on code-related matters.

Assisted with plan checking for complex projects and conflict resolution.

Participated in budget planning, budget review and long-range planning.

Building Inspection Specialist | Clark County, Nevada | 2000-2003 Developed an education program for inspectors. Researched, authored and maintained the department’s electrical policies, procedures and inspection technical guidelines. Represented the department to the local utility on all electrical related issues. Represented the department at all electrical industry meetings such as IAEI, IEEE, AGC, NEMA, ABC, SNHBA and IBEW.

Senior Building Inspector | Clark County, Nevada | 1997-2000 Combination inspection of single family and commercial occupancies for code compliance. Maintained an inspection record in the field and office. Investigated complaints and issuance of enforcement actions. Assisted all customers in addressing problems and concerns on compliance issues on all code-related matters related to active permits.

Combination Inspector | Clark County, Nevada | 1995-1997 Combination inspection of single family and commercial occupancies for code compliance. Maintained an inspection record in the field and office. Investigated complaints and issuance of enforcement actions.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 Associates in Building Inspection
Technology, Butte Community
College
 Associates in Mathematics, Butte
Community College

CERTIFICATIONS
 Certified Access Specialist – CASp710
International Code Council, 8250398
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Permit Technician
 ICC Commercial Building Inspector
 ICC Residential Plans Examiner
 ICC Residential Combination
Inspector
ANDREW BURKE, CASp, ICC
CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST | PLANS EXAMINER
Andrew is a Certified Access Specialist and ICC certified Plans Examiner with more than 17 years of industry experience in plan review, inspection, administration and estimating. Andrew has extensive plan check experience in multi-story mixed use projects and provides in-depth review of accessibility issues to ensure compliance with all California building codes.

His CASp certification provides him the ability to ensure all aspects of accessibility have been achieved. His formal training in ICC codes, as well as on-the-job experience, helps him to provide thorough and accurate commercial and residential plan reviews and inspections. Andrew is an excellent asset to any building department both in the office and out in the field.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Plans Examiner | Certified Access Specialist (CASp) | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 – Present
Provides life safety and accessibility plan review for residential and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Plans Examiner | Certified Access Specialist (CASp) | Interwest Consulting Group|2013 – 2021
Provided life safety and accessibility plan reviews for residential and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Building Department Intern | Town of Los Gatos | 2012
Andrew worked as an intern in various areas of a building department. Performed field inspections and worked behind the counter as a permit technician.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
2020 Project Expansion | University of California, Merced | 2016 - 2021 Life Safety and Accessibility Plans Examiner | Andrew reviewed plans for the campus expansion for compliance California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical Codes, Energy Standards, Fire Codes, Green Building Standards Code, and California Accessibility Standards, state and local building codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances.

Sac Republic Soccer Stadium | City of Sacramento | 2019 Accessibility Plans Examiner| Andrew provided plan review for this new 409,664 SF stadium to ensure compliance with applicable accessibility codes and standards.

North 40 | Town of Las Gatos | 2018 - 2019
Accessibility Plans Examiner| Andrew provided accessibility reviews for the new 211,773 SF mixed use building in the North 40 development consisting of residential, parking garage, community room and commercial.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Public Administration, Minor in
English, California Baptist University
 AA, Construction Technology,
Riverside Community College
 AA, Physical Education, Riverside
City College

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
ICC NO. 859362:
 Master Code Professional
 Electrical Inspector
 Certified Fire Code Official
 Certified Building Official
 Plumbing Inspector UPC
 Mechanical Inspector UMC
 Fire Plans Examiner
 Building Code Official
 Combination Inspector – Legacy
 Fire Inspector I
 Fire Inspector II
 Building Inspector
 Residential Combination Inspector
 Building Plans Examiner
 Combination Dwelling Inspector –
Uniform Codes
 Building Code Specialist
 Fire Code Specialist
 Residential Energy Inspector/Plans
Examiner
 Accessibility Inspector/Plans
Examiner

MARK BERG, CBO, MCP, ICC

PLANS EXAMINER / MASTER CODE PROFESSIONAL
Mark is an ICC Certified Building Official, Plans Examiner, Building Inspector, and Master Code Professional with experience performing life-safety, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and structural reviews in residential, multi-family and commercial projects. Mark has successfully guided department staff with inspection and plan review of all phases of complex construction projects. He is experienced utilizing building department permit tracking software and managing all common building department responsibilities, including plan review, multi-discipline inspections, plan review and inspection scheduling, field supervision, regulatory compliance, code interpretation, and project acceptance. Mark also possesses exceptional skills in complaint resolution, problem solving, damage assessment and team building.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building Official, Life Safety Plans Examiner | BPR
Consulting Group | 2021-Present
Performing comprehensive plan review and inspection services for client agencies. Reviews residential and non-residential plans for compliance with California Building, Life Safety, Fire, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical Codes, Energy and Green Standards, local building codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances.

Building Official, Life Safety Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2017-2021
Performed comprehensive plan review and inspection services for residential and commercial projects for client agencies. Projects included residential, multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial projects consisting of tenant improvements and new buildings.

Building Official | City of Redlands | 2015-2017
Supervised staff coordination with cities, agencies and the public on various Technical or legal aspects of programs. Performed the most complex and difficult plan checks for both building and fire life safety. Reviewed the new and existing codes and regulations and recommended revision to current ordinances, policies, and inspection methods to meet new requirements.

Building Inspection Supervisor | City of Rancho Cucamonga | 2010-2015
Supervised and trained building inspection staff, developed inspection related policies and guidelines for the department, conflict resolution and code interpretations.

Building Official | City of Norco | 2006-2011
Supervised staff coordination with cities, agencies and the public on various technical or legal aspects of programs.

Performed the most complex and difficult plan checks for both building and fire life safety. Reviewed the new and Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2

MARK BERG, CBO, MCP, ICC
BPR
existing codes and regulations and recommended revision to current ordinances, policies, and inspection methods to meet new requirements. Investigated violations of building construction codes and determined necessity for issuance of legal complaints.

Building Division Manager | County of Riverside | 2001-2006 Handled difficult public relations problems, directs investigations of complaint or problems, and recommends resolutions. Assisted in arranging and conducting classroom and on-the-job training sessions for the technical personnel and counter staff. Supervised the plan examination process, inspections, documentation activities and the development process.

Plans Examiner-Sr. Building Inspector | City of Temecula | 1991-2001 Oversee the plan examination process, inspections, documentation activities and the development review process.

Provided code interpretations and developed technical documents. Performed the most complex building code compliance plan reviews.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 CALBO – Damage Assessment Committee, State Building Codes Committee  CACEO – California Association of Code Enforcement Officers  CEC – California Energy Commission
 ICC – Administrative Committee
 NFPA – National Fire Prevention Association, Building Systems Committee  IAPMO – Code Interpretation Committees for UPC, UMC
 JAEI – Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections
 City of Riverside Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 Consumnes River College – Building
Inspection Technology
 Yuba College – Course work in
Pesticide Applications

CERTIFICATIONS
International Code Council 5087217
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist B8
 ICC California Building Plans
Examiner I6
 ICC California Residential
Combination Inspector J5
 ICC California Residential Inspector
J1
 ICC California Residential Electrical
Inspector J2
 ICC California Residential Plumbing
Inspector J3
 ICC California Residential
Mechanical Inspector J4
 ICC California Commercial Building
Inspector I1
 ICC California Commercial Plumbing
Inspector I3
 ICC California Commercial
Mechanical Inspector I4
 ICC Accessibility Inspector / Plans
Examiner
 ICC Plumbing Inspector P5
 ICC Building Inspector B5
 ICC Building Inspector UBC
 ICC Mechanical Inspector M5
 ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
 ICC Building Plans Examiner B3
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
Tim Scott, CBO, ICC

PLANS EXAMINER
For the past 20 years Tim as provided building safety services on behalf of Northern California communities. Tim served as theDeputy Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector for the City of Davis, City of Elk Grove and the County of Sacramento. His experience as a Deputy Building Official exposed him to the many facets of managing a Building Department and allowed him to develop the exceptional organizational and management skills necessary to provide superior services to the communities he serves.

Tim’s experience includes plan review and inspection for all types and sizes of projects including residential, multi-family, commercial, institutional, and industrial projects. He is familiar with multiple permit tracking software systems utilized by jurisdictions and has managed all facets of building department services. Tim currently utilizes his skills as a Building Official, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector to benefit Northern California communities.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building Official / Plans Examiner / Building Inspector  BPR Consulting Group  2021 – Present
Tim provides Building Official, plan review and inspection services to Cities and Counties throughout Northern California. Tim’s responsibilities also include meeting with clients to ensure that expectations are being met and maintaining client relationships.

Assistant Chief Building Official / Sr. Plans Examiner  City of Davis  2008 – 2019
Tim’s role included management ofthe City of Davis’s Building Department, supervising inspection and plan review staff. Tim over-saw the plan review department to ensure that plan reviews were being completed in a timely and consistent manner. Tim also coordinated plan reviews performed by outside consultants and provided quality control of the consultant’s reviews.

Assistant Building Official / Sr. Plans Examiner Consultant / City of Elk Grove2003 – 2008
Tim worked in the City of Elk Grove on a contract basis. Tim’s duties included assisting with management of the City’s Building Department including management of the City’s plan review department to ensure quality and consistency of the plan reviews. Tim began working in the City of Elk Grove early in the City’s formation and was instrumental in establishing policies and procedures for the City’s new Building Department.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Tim Scott, CBO, ICC, Plan Review
BPR
Plans Examiner / Building Inspector County of Sacramento  2000 – 2003 Tim provided plan reviews and building inspection services for the County of Sacramento Building Department. Tim was responsible for a range of projects from small residential remodels to large complex commercial and industrial projects.

General Building Contractor Self Employed  1993 – 2000 As a self-employed general contractor Tim was responsible for coordination of all activities associated with a small business including client relations and managing all phases of construction for wood framed residential and commercial projects.

Carpenter / Foreman  Timberline Builders  1983 - 1993 Tim began working for Timberline Builders as a carpenter and worked his way up to the position of foreman where he supervised a crew of carpenters. Tim was responsible for quality assurance as well as the productivity of the crew.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Supervising Plan Examiner / Assistant Building Official  City of Elk Grove  2003 - 2008 As the Assistant Building Official and Supervising Plans Examiner Tim was instrumental in developing and implementing policies and procedures in the development of the City of Elk Grove’s Building Department.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Business and General
Management, San Francisco State
University
 AA, Business Administration, College
of San Mateo
 Coursework, Electrical Engineering
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo

CERTIFICATIONS
International Code Council 8005399
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Plumbing Inspector

MARK MEYERS, CBO, ICC

PLAN REVIEW / INSPECTION
For 25 years, Mark served as a Building Official, Deputy Building Official, Building Inspector, Plans Examiner and Permit Coordinator for the City and County of Madera and the City of Clovis. He has implemented permit tracking software for multiple jurisdictions, prepared operating budgets and managed all facets of building department activities. He recently served as an Inspection Manager, supervising inspection, and clerical staff, for the UC Merced 2020 Project, helping to design and implement the inspection program to fit the University’s evolving needs.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building OfficialProject Manager  BPR Consulting Group  2021 – Present
Mark provides Building Official services for several Cities and Counties throughout California. In addition, Mark provides supervision for inspection staff and clerical staff for the Cities and Counties where he works. Marks responsibilities also includes meeting with clients to ensure that expectations are being met and maintaining client relationships.

Inspection Manager  Consultant  2016 – 2021
Mark supervised inspection staff and clerical staff for the UC Merced 2020 Project, working with client staff for the design and implementation of the inspection program to fit the changing needs of UC Merced.

Building Official City of Clovis2008 – 2015
Mark supervised 9 staff and was responsible for all building inspections. His duties included supervision and training of office staff and implementing new training programs for building inspectors. Mark designed and implemented a new computerized permit tracking and issuance program for the Planning and Development Services Department.

This system included complete integration with the City’s well-developed GIS systems. All permit processing was done manually before new permit tracking system was implemented. The program interfaces with the Tax Collector and Assessor’s Office. Mark formulated a million-dollar budget and presented it annually. He worked regularly with the Fire, Planning, and Engineering Departments.

Deputy Building Official City of Clovis  2006 – 2008
Mark supervised 14 staff responsible for building inspection processes and building permit fee revision. He trained office staff and implemented new training programs for building inspectors. Mark designed and implemented new computerized permit fees to better comply with state laws and to track time for each inspection type.

Permit Coordinator County of Madera  2000 – 2006
Mark was responsible for all building inspection processes and coordinating building permit issuance. He performed all the duties of a Building Official, and supervised and trained a staff of 20 employees, as well as implementing new training programs for building inspectors. Mark designed and implemented a new computerized permit tracking and issuance program for the Resource Management Agency. Mark coordinated and supervised the remodel of a 37,000 square foot retail building into an office complex for the Resource Management Agency and moved four Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Mark Meyers, CBO, ICC, Plan Review / Inspection
BPR
departments into one building. Mark’s duties allowed him to work regularly with the Environmental Health, Fire, Planning, Engineering and General Services, Public Works, Roads and Transportation Departments.

Building Inspector  Plans Examiner  Acting Chief Building Official  City of Madera | 1991 – 2000
As a building inspector, Mark inspected residential and commercial buildings, and was responsible for enforcing all building codes per State and local codes. As a plans examiner, Mark regularly worked with the planning department. He formulated the budget for the Building Department and regularly presented staff reports to the City Council. He also did preliminary work on designing a computerized tracking program for the issuance of permits for the Building Department. Mark was eventually designated Acting Chief Building Official.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
2020 Project Expansion  University of California, Merced  2016 - 2021 Inspection Manager | Mark supervised inspection staff and clerical staff for the UC Merced 2020 Project, working with client staff for the design and implementation of the inspection program to fit the changing needs of UC Merced.

Table Mountain RancheriaFriant, CA  2018 – 2021
Building Official | Mark served as the Building Official for the Table Mountain Casino and Hotel Expansion providing guidance to the Tribe for code alternatives and manages the inspection and plan review team for the project.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

CERTIFICATIONS
 IAPMO Certified Plumbing Inspector,
030666
 IAPMO Certified Mechanical
Inspector, 090146
 CA LEED Certified, LEED AP BD+C,
10436985
 Certified Access Specialist, CASp-439
International Code Council, 1061008
 ICC Building Code Official
 ICC CA Residential Building,
Plumbing, Mechanical,
Combination, Electrical Inspector
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC CA Commercial Building,
Plumbing, Electrical, Combination,
Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Building, Electrical,
Combination, Mechanical, Plumbing
Inspector
 ICC CA Combination Inspector
 ICC Mechanical UMC
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
 ICC CA Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Commercial Combination
Inspector

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 International Code Council,
RICK WALTERS, CASp, LEED, CBO, ICC

PLAN REVIEW / INSPECTION
Rick has over 30 years of experience in the construction industry with over 30 of those years in the Building Inspection industry. Rick has experience as a building official and inspector. He has provided senior inspector services in disaster zones for floods and wildfires which required communication with the National Guard, elected officials and law enforcement. Additionally, Rick is experienced in inspection management, council meetings, planning meetings, city and county design review meetings, field inspections, permit tracking and issuance, record keeping, construction techniques, and office procedures.

Rick has provided inspection services for over 25 different City, County, State and Military installations. He inspected services of a Wildfire Disaster Zone involving over 100 structures and provided Flood Zone inspections for over 1,100 homes. He provided Chief Building Official services to the Cities of Dixon, Calistoga, Yountville, St. Helena, Gridley, Auburn and Woodland.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Chief Building Official | Certified Access Specialist | Senior Inspector / BPR Consulting Group / 2021 - Present
Rick provides Building Official, building inspection, plan review, CASp review and inspection services for several clients in Northern California.

Chief Building Official | Certified Access Specialist | Senior Inspector / Consulting Firm / 2014 - 2021
Performed Building Official, building inspection and plan review services for various Northern California municipalities, as well as providing CASp plan review and inspection services.

Inspection Services / Consulting Firm | Beale Air Force Base, CA / 2012 - 2014
Rick provides full inspection services for military housing at Beale Air Force Base. Inspections of single-family homes and duplexes include foundation, framing, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and final inspections. Daily and weekly reports are compiled listing any deficiencies or items needing repair/replacement.

Fill-In Building Inspection Services / Consulting Firm / 2011 - 2012
Rick has provided fill-in building inspection services during staff vacations, sick-time, and periods of high-workload for the Cities of West Sacramento and Napa. He has inspected residential and commercial structures for compliance with all applicable building codes and local ordinances.

Building Inspection Services Manager / City of Woodland, CA / 2008 - 2011 Rick oversaw the inspection program for the City of Woodland. He managed and directed the inspectors on staff as well as performed inspections for residential, commercial, and industrial facilities.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Rick Walters, CBO, CASp, LEED, ICC, Plan Review / Inspection BPR
Senior Building Inspector / City of Woodland, CA / 2007 - 2008 As a Senior Building Inspector in the City of Woodland, Rick performed inspections and building plan code compliance reviews for residential, commercial, and industrial projects including hotels, industrial construction,and multiple housing tracts. Other job duties included permit tracking and issuance as well as record keeping.

Interim Building Official / City of Woodland, CA / 2006 - 2007 Senior Building Inspector / City of Woodland, CA / 2004 - 2006 Senior Building Inspector / City of Auburn, CA / 2004
Interim Building Official / City of Auburn, CA / 2003 – 2004 Senior Building Inspector II / City of Auburn, CA / 1999 – 2004 Building Inspector II / County of Yuba, CA / 1990 – 1999 Building Inspector I / County of Yuba, CA / 1989 - 1990 Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
 AWS Associate Certified Welding
Inspector, 01110444
 ACI Concrete Field-Testing
Technician Grade I, 030005
 Nuclear Density Testing Gauge,
12495
ICC NO. 5003730
 ICC Reinforced Concrete Special
Inspector Associate
 ICC Spray Applied Fire Proofing
Special Inspector
 ICC Structural Welding Special
Inspector
 ICC Structural Masonry Special
Inspector
 ICC Structural Steel and Bolting
Special Inspector
 ICC Commercial Building Inspector

ISIDORO ZAPIEN, ICC

BUILDING INSPECTOR
Isidoro is an Inspector with 23 years of experience in the construction industry. He has extensive experience and is currently certified in structural steel and welding, high strength bolting, spray applied fireproofing, structural masonry and reinforced concrete. Isidoro is also nuclear gauge certified with experience in soils and asphalt. He has performed various inspection services including quality assurance and quality control to ensure projects were built in accordance with approved plans, specifications, and specified codes.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Inspector | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Isidoro provides building inspection services for various Northern California municipalities.He provides inspections for code compliance and compliance with the approved drawings for residential and commercial projects.

Isidoro’s areas of expertise include building inspections, code interpretations, construction concept/scope, client relationship management and project management.

Inspector | Consultant | 2017 - 2021
Isidoro provided building inspection services for various Northern California municipalities. He provided inspections for code compliance and compliance with the approved drawings for residential and commercial projects.

Senior Special Inspector | Pleasanton, CA | 2012 - 2017 Isidoro performed special inspections on a variety of commercial projects including and 2.8 million square foot Amazon fulfillment center, a seven story Kaiser Permanente Hospital and Medical Center, a 500,000-square foot tilt up and the Nasa Ames Research Center in Mountain View which consisted of 5-million-gallon water tanks and a super computer cooling tower. As the lead special inspector for these projects, Isidoro was responsible for coordinating with the project inspectors and project managers on daily inspections, performing field inspections which included welding, concrete, rebar, and fireproofing, mapping all RFI changes on the approved drawings and submitting daily filed reports to the client.

Senior Special Inspector | Quality Control Manager | San Diego, CA | 2009 - 2012 Isidoro was the Senior Special Inspector and Quality Control Manager for a variety of naval air station projects including a Marine Reserve training center, group hanger #5, a child development center and the renovation of building 730 A. He was responsible for providing special inspections for concrete, structural steel and welding, structural masonry, reinforced concrete, material sampling, verification of material type, field density testing and monitoring quality of work. He also ensured his daily reports documented compliance to plan, the geotechnical report, job specifications and compliance to the code.

Senior Engineering Technician | Concord, CA | 2002 - 2009 As the Senior Engineering Technician, Isidoro was responsible for concrete and welding inspections in the field, NDT procedures during construction and performing construction inspections as required on multiple projects including the Livermore Civic Center Library and the West Sacramento Force Main Pipeline.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
ICC CERTIFICATION NO. 8984654:
 ICC Commercial Building Inspector
 ICC Residential Building Inspector
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Residential Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Residential Electrical Inspector
 ICC Residential Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Residential Comb. Inspector
 ICC Building Plans Examiner

LANDON COLLINS, ICC

BUILDING INSPECTOR
Landon has 17 years of experience in the construction industry. He is an ICC certified inspector with experience providing building, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing inspections to residential projects well as providing commercial building inspections for Cities and Counties. He provides Building Department inspection services to ensure projects were built in accordance with approved plans, specifications, and specified codes.

Landon also brings considerable experience from working for several construction companies in the Central Valley Region.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building Inspector | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present Landon provides building inspection services for various Central California municipalities.He provides inspections for code compliance and compliance with the approved construction documents for residential and commercial projects.

Building Inspector | Consultant | 2021
Duties included Residential inspections for Madera County Building Division and running day to day operations as the lead for the Building Department at the City of Sonora.

Building Inspector I & II | Merced County Dept. of Public Works- Building Division | 2019 - 2021 Senior Field Inspector. Provided general building inspection and public safety inspections. Inspected all aspects of the construction process including building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical phases of residential, commercial, and agricultural projects. Also inspected industrial projects including local agricultural, manufacturing, and food processing plants.

Site Supervisor | DMC Construction | 2018-2019
Construction Site Supervisor and Managing Carpenter for a growing construction company in Merced, CA. Direct and delegate responsibilities to company employees as well as management of subcontractors from various trades, with strict adherence to code and high-quality building standards. Daily hands-on site work as needed to complete projects.

Owner / General Contractor | Collins Construction | 2013 - 2018 Residential and Commercial remodels and new construction. Re-wires and Electrical additions, fine finish work, plumbing, framing. Experience with Contracts, plan reading, scheduling and budgets.

Lead Carpenter | Williams and Sutton Construction | 2011 - 2013 Major Residential and Commercial remodels. Electrical, plumbing, framing, finish work. Supervision construction crew.

Communications Technician II | Comcast Corporation | 2010 - 2011 Installation and repair of cable, internet, and phone services inside and outside of customer premises.

Experience doing line work and climbing utility poles.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Landon Collins, ICC – Inspector
BPR
Finish Carpenter & General Construction | DE Construction | 2008 - 2010 Carpentry / woodworking including framing, fine finish work and trim. Installed wood and tile floors, doors, windows, and cabinets. Work included steel framing, concrete, plumbing and electrical work, painting and general repair. Some supervisory responsibilities.

Finish Carpenter | Woodland Stairs and Millwork | 2006 - 2008 Installation and repair of stars and stair components in production and custom homes. Major emphasis on attention to detail as work required precise measurements to ensure proper angles and adherence to applicable codes.

Carpenter | Silverstar Development | 2004 - 2006
Custom home construction including framing, finish woodwork, concrete, tiling, installing doors, windows, Cabinets, drywall, and electrical work.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Long Beach
 MS, Public Administration, California
State University, Long Beach

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE
& CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Civil Engineer CE-45710
 Registered Environmental Assessor
5640
 Certified Permitting Professional
D11308, SCAQMD

DANIEL GARCIA, PE, REA, CPP

CIVIL ONSITE AND GRADING REVIEW
Dan is a licensed civil engineer with approximately 38 years of public works engineering and project management experience. He has served in senior and executive management public works positions with the cities of Maywood, Costa Mesa, Norwalk, El Segundo, Solvang, Culver City and Novato. Daniel brings to each project experience and expertise in the areas of Capital Improvement Program management, Private Development, Grading, Parks and Land Use, Water Resources and Transportation Planning.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Senior Civil Engineer | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present Dan provides design and review services for numerous Public Works Departments in the Southern California Region.

Senior Civil Engineer | Project Manager | Consultant | 2014 – 2021
Dan provided project management project management, design services and reviews for numerous Public Works Departments. Dan managed numerous capital improvements, provided numerous site/grading reviews, reviewed numerous wastewater improvement projects and managed numerous street improvement projects. He served as a Public Works Director, City Engineer, and Project Manager for numerous Cities.

City Engineer | City of Norwalk | 2011 - 2014
Notable projects while serving as City Engineer include completing the design and right of way phase of the $22 million Firestone Bridge project and implementing $6 million in I-5 mitigation projects. He coordinated efforts with such agencies as the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Caltrans, and Gateway Cities, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Southern California Edison, and the County of Los Angeles.

Assistant City Engineer | City of El Segundo | 2007 - 2010 Completed the construction of the Douglas Street Gap Closure Project ($39 million) Implemented $1 million seismic retrofit of the City’s 3.1 MG Water Reservoir. Completed construction and audits for the Douglas Street Gap Closure

3.1 Million Gallon Water Reservoir Seismic Retrofit. Street Improvements, Waterline and Sewer Replacements (various locations). 118th Street Improvements – Included reconstruction of street and coordination with BNSF Railway and Metro for the replacement of deteriorated rail with concrete paneled rails.

Senior Civil Engineer | City of Culver City | 2005 - 2007 As manager of the Capital Improvement Program and Sewer Collection System, his role included the coordination of industrial waste, air quality management, assessment districts and recycled water. Coordinated the Amalgamated Sewer Agreement with the City of Los Angeles, this included making capital improvements to the telemetry system for meters detecting the flow in and out of Culver City. Managed the Sewer Assessment District – This included coordination with the Los Angeles County Assessor regarding changes in customer water billings and capital improvements. Analysis of the Braddock Sewer Pump Station Improvement which led to the overhaul of the Culver City Sewer Master Plan. Instrumental in Sewer Replacements & Street Improvements (various locations) Public Works Director / City Engineer | City of Solvang | 2004 Responsibilities included the implementation of the Capital Improvement Program and maintenance of streets, storm drains, private development, transit, sewer collection, sewer treatment, water distribution, wastewater Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Dan Garcia, PE, REA, CPP, Civil Onsite & Grading Review BPR
treatment, building maintenance and solid waste. Coordinated city issues with regional agencies such as the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG), the Public Works Coordination Council, the Sanitation Agencies Management Association (SAMA) and the Central Coast Water Agency (CCWA).Obtained approval from the State of California for a $10.2 million Revolving Fund Grant for water treatment on Well Number 3 in the Santa Ynez River. Reviewed private development including grading, paving, storm drain and sewer. Implemented the development of a new Skate Park. Street Improvements, Water and Sewer Replacements (various locations).

Obtained two new buses for Solvang Transit. Wrote LOMR’s (Letters of Map Revisions) for FEMA affected parcels Principal Civil Engineer | City of Novato | 2001 - 2004 Dan was responsible for the management of both private and Capital Improvement Projects. He successfully obtained approvals through presentations to City Council, Planning Commission and Design Review Committee and coordinated with the Planning, Building, and Parks and Recreation Departments within the City. Externally, he coordinated with Marin County, the Army Corps, the Coastal Conservancy, special Districts, and the public. He was also responsible for FEMA Flood Districts and encroachment permits. Private Development Review – As the Principal Civil Engineer in charge of Private Development, Dan coordinated with Developers and their Engineers through the City’s Design Review, Planning and City Council processes in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, implementing Conditions of Approval and other State and Federal requirements. This included advocating for the City’s interests in the design of these developments.

Development Review Engineer | City of Hayward | 2000 - 2001 Responsible for managing private projects, assessment and benefit districts, annexations, FEMA flood districts, building division engineering review and liaison for the Community Development Department with Public Works. As a required staff member of the Planning Commission, he advocated engineering issues there and at City Council meetings. Working in the Planning Division, he was the central liaison to Public Works. He also managed all engineering issues in the Planning and Building Divisions, including permit issuance. He was the City’s Coordinator with LAFCO and Alameda County. Reviewed all Private Development Subdivision Plans for compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City’s Conditions of Approval. As a seated member of the Planning Commission, hewas the City’s Engineering Advocate for Private Development. As the City’s representative to the Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) for Alameda County, he advocated for Out-Of-Area Service Agreements with the County for sewer service in the County to the Hayward sewer system. Organized and implemented Landscaping and Lighting Districts under Proposition 218 throughout the City.

Assist. Harbor District Engineer | City of Los Angeles | 1984 - 2000 Responsible for the management of the Harbor District Bureau of Engineering office that included directing capital improvement of the streets, storm drain and wastewater programs. Accomplishments included the implementation of a Geographical Information System, Successful development and completion of a $5 million Watts Sewer Replacement Program, and the implementation of $45 million in other capital improvement projects. Responsible for the CIP budget for that district. As Assistant Division Engineer for the Solids Technology and Resource Recovery Division at Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant, he supervised 105 consultant employees in the implementation of $500 million in research and development of solids handling projects. From 1998 to 2000, he served as the City of Los Angeles On-Call Emergency Sewer Coordinator using the City’s on-call list to address the sewer emergencies in the City of LA and analyzed the hydraulic problems with the City’s major sewers.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 Gavilan College, Certificate
 Evergreen Valley College, Certificate

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
 ICC Certified Permit Technician,
8821141

STACY BARKER, ICC

PERMIT TECHNICIAN / ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
Stacy is an ICC Certified Permit Technician with seven years of experience providing services to multiple Northern California municipal clients. In addition to her technical abilities, Stacy has excellent customer service skills that help her to work well with applicants and City staff. She is efficient in the use of the GreenVue’s Digital Permit Suite, Accela Automation, Community Core, as well as other municipal tracking systems.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Permit Technician | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 – Present Primary responsibilities include providing permit technician services to Norther California municipal clients and customer assistance to the general public. Processes documents and reports and directs them to the appropriate department/person. Stacy facilitates a positive productive working environment and maintains clear communication within the office.

Inspection Analyst | UC Merced | 2016 – Present
Primary responsibilities included provided administrative support to our consulting staff and customer assistance to the general public. Processed documents and reports and directed them to the appropriate department/person.

Stacy has workedon the UC Merced 2020 Project assisting in all facets of permit technician services. Stacy facilitated a positive productive working environment and maintains clear communication within the office.

Permit Technician | City of Foster City | 2015
As a Permit Technician for consulting firms, Stacy received and reviewed building applications from customers; assessed scope of project and relevant permit requirements; educated customers regarding necessary permits and general code compliance of their proposed projects. She verified that projects obtained all necessary approvals; verified professional and contractor licensing; calculated and verified valuations and fees; accepted payments and issued permits as authorized. Stacy maintained records and prepared reports as required. She assisted in completing permit applications by explaining building permit requirements; assisted and advised customers in matters relating to building requirements and status of submitted projects. She tracked plan check applications from submission to approval; routed plan checks to appropriate departments and updated applicants on status of their applications. Stacy also calculated fees for permits; logged inspections request and prepared field files for daily inspections for building inspectors; assisted building inspectors in coordinating inspection requests; and performed clerical duties for the building department. She prepared monthly reports for the Assessor’s Office and Construction Monitor and prepared monthly billings.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
2020 Project Expansion  University of California, Merced  2016 - 2020 Inspection Analyst | Stacy provided administrative support to our consulting staff and customer assistance to the general public. Processed documents and reports and directed them to the appropriate department/person.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 California State Los Angeles, BS in
Criminal Justice

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
 ICC Certified Permit Technician,
9560759

ALICIA VENTURA, ICC

SENIOR PERMIT TECHNICIAN / ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
Alicia is an ICC Certified Permit Technician with over nine years of experience providing services to multiple California municipal clients. Alicia is well versed in her role as a Permit Technician and has worked with several municipal tracking systems including Trakit. In addition to her technical abilities, Alicia has excellent customer service skills that help her to work well with applicants and City staff. In addition, Alicia is fluent in Spanish, proficient with Microsoft Office software including Word, Excel and PowerPoint, is detail oriented and is able to multi-task.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Sr. Permit Technician | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 – Present Primary responsibilities include providing permit technician services to California municipal clients and customer assistance to the general public.

Processes documents and reports and directs them to the appropriate department/person. Alicia facilitates a positive productive working environment and maintains clear communication within the office.

Permit Technician II | Consultant | 2020 – 2021
Alicia provided Permit Technician services to the City of Corona’s Building Department. She coordinated the permit process for special projects which were typically large, complex projects. Her duties coordinating the intake, review process and the issuance of permits. She coordinated with inspectors, plans examiners and planners to determine if projects were ready for Certificate of Occupancy, issued the Certificate of Occupancy, temporary utility bonds and Temporary Certificate of Occupancies. She managed electrical releases for all City projects. Alicia’s duties also included the review and management of digital plan reviews submitted online utilizing Project Dox, reviewed hard copy and digital for the purpose of establishing project valuations and computing plan review and permit fees. She reviewed plans and permit applications to ensure conformance with the City’s submittal requirements, codes, ordinances,and regulations governing construction. Alicia performed data entry into the permit tracking systemand collected statistical data to prepare monthly reports for both the public and City staff. She assisted the public in the completion of forms and documents and developed and maintained procedural manuals and worksheets. Alicia also provided over the counter plan reviews for minor submittals. She provided excellent customer services to both external and internal clients to maintain an efficient Building Department.

Permit Technician | Consultant | 2020
As a consultant, Alicia provided Permit Technician services to the Cities if Huntington Park and Corona Building Departments. Her responsibilities included reviewing plans and permit applications to ensure conformance with the City’s submittal requirements, codes, ordinances, and regulations governing construction. She issues permits for building construction including permits for commercial, residential, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing projects.

She performed over the counter plan reviews for minor submittals. Alicia reviewed projects for the purpose of establishing project valuations and computing plan review and permit fees. In addition, Alicia also acted as the Plan Control Coordinator which included the control of the numbering, filing and routing of building and engineering plans, distribution of the plans to the corresponding City personnel or Department, gathered and tracked data for financial monthly reports and consultants invoices. She monitored plan reviews to ensure the reviews were Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
Alicia Ventura, ICC Permit Technician
BPR
completed on time. She worked with the general public to help facilitate the submittal of applications and provided a high level of customer service.

Permit Technician II | City of Corona | 2019 - 2020
Alicia provided Permit Technician services to the City of Corona Building Department. Her duties included assisting in processing plan check applications for construction projects which included commercial, industrial, and residential projects. She reviewed plans for the purposes of establishing valuation and computing plan check and permit fees. She reviewed plans and permit applications for building construction to ensure conformance with the City's submittal requirements, codes, ordinances, and regulations governing construction. She issued permits for building construction. Alicia performed plan checks for small projects, such as patio covers, backyard pools, and fences. She coordinated complex plan reviews, routing to the appropriate plans examiners and Departments for review. She answers inquiries from contractors, architects and the public related to City regulations, maintained departmental property records, permit files, and retrieved information files for the public or division personnel.

Alicia worked cooperatively with property owners, contractors, architects, or their representatives to resolve questions regarding plan check, construction inspection, permit fees or permit issuance within the scope of counter assignment. She assisted the Building Official and/or Plan Check Manager on special assignments that include researching, coordinating the archiving of approved plans via electronic scanning, developing policies and operating procedures for public counter tasks.

Permit Technician | Consultant | 2018-2019
As a consultant, Alicia provided Permit Technician Services to the City of Corona Building Department.

Her duties included Issuing and preparing permits related to plan check to ensure compliance with Planning, Public Works and Building Department standards, development conditions, improvement standards, constructions specifications, and City ordinances. She performed over the counter plan reviews for minor projects to ensure compliance with City standards. Performed data entry and coordinated routing of various construction plans. Alicia performed various administrative, reporting, billing, and accounts receivable tasks. She managed a wide range of duties in a timely and effective manner, including answering phone calls, email correspondence, scanning legal documents, preparing files, responding to public records request. She provided excellent customer service to both external and internal clients.

Detention Services Officer | L.A. County Probation Department | 2017-2018 Alicia supervised detained probation youth in their activities within the unit, on work assignments, during recreation periods, medical appointments, or awaiting court appearances. Maintained order and control of the unit. Took appropriate action in connection with rules and regulations of the department.

Supervised the movement of youth within and outside the facility. Observed and recorded the behavior of youth. Provided situational counseling as needed.

Permit Technician | City of Gardena | 2010-2017
Duties included entering daily inspections for City Inspectors and performing daily office support services. Alicia greeted customers efficiently and effectively. She reviewed and routed plans for plan check, checked for basic code compliance, calculated fees, verified parcel ownership. She reviewed address files and checked for code enforcement violations. She issued electrical, mechanical, residential, commercial, and yard-sale permits. Alicia created monthly reports for record keeping purposes and created monthly notices for residents regarding permit status. She assisted all Community Development staff and worked alongside Code Enforcement Officers as needed.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 DeAnza College, 2017, AA in Liberal
Arts

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
 ICC Certified Permit Technician,
10138242

SAMANTHA BARKER, ICC

PERMIT TECHNICIAN / ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
Samantha is an ICC Certified Permit Technician with experience providing Permit Technician services in support for municipal building departments.

Samantha’s experience includes updating data bases, data input, permit tracking system management, and report generation. In addition to her technical abilities, Samantha utilizes her excellent customer service skills to assist department customers, applicants, and City staff. Samantha is efficient, detail oriented and possesses the ability to multi-task.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Permit Technician | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 – Present Primary responsibilities include providing permit technician services to California municipal clients and customer assistance for building department services. Processes documents and reports and directs them to the appropriate department/person. Samantha facilitates a positive productive working environment and maintains clear communication with permit applicants and coworkers.

Customer Service Associate | Michael’s | 2015 - 2020
As a Customer Service Associate, Samantha’s responsibilities consisted of providing outstanding customer service which included handling transactions, providing knowledge of products and supplies, knowledge of the construction of projects, instructing customers on the appropriate application of products, teaching in-house classes for customers and maintaining front end cleanliness and organization.

Customer Service Associate | L’occitane | 2013 – 2014
Samantha’s primary duties included assisting customers, managing transactions, and providing outstanding customer services. She was also responsible for opening and closing out registers, bank drops, maintaining storefront organization, receiving and processing shipments, report of damaged items and inventory maintenance.

Customer Service Associate | Northern California Renaissance Faire | 2010 – Present (Seasonal)
Samantha’s primary responsibilities included providing customerrelations and inventory managementto maintain product organization. She was responsible for sales activities as well as the merchandise displays. Samantha facilitates a positive productive working environment and maintained clear communication with staff and customers.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Business Administration
Ca. Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo, CA
 AS, Business Administration
Reedley College
Reedley, CA

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
 ICC Certified Permit Technician,
10110674
 California Real Estate Broker

NANCY MEYERS, ICC

PERMIT TECHNICIAN / ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
Nancy is an ICC Certified Permit Technician with over thirty years of experience providing accounting, administrative and customer service to public and private clients. Her wide range of experience has enabled her to become extremely proficient in offering an excellent attention to detail and quality customer service.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Permit Technician | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 – Present Primary responsibilities include providing permit technician services to Norther California municipal clients and customer assistance to the general public. Processes documents and reports and directs them to the appropriate department/person. Nancy facilitates a positive productive working environment and maintains clear communication within the office.

Assistant Accounting Manager | Darrel’s Mini Storage | 2003- 2018
Nancy performed a multitude of accounting and finance responsibilities for the 58 facility, 300 employee organization. Duties included bank reconciliation for 58 sub-accounts, customer account auditing and customer service, correction of and research for all out-of-balance deposits (over 20,000 annually) and regular sales tax and employee tax reports. Nancy also provided back-up support for the 300-person payroll, accounts payable/receivable and 401k plan assistance. She was responsible for the budget creation for all 58 facilities and provided monthly reporting of fiscal performance and expectations.

Partner / Broker | DeCesari Realty | 2004 - Present
Nancy performs all accounting and tax preparation functions.

Administrative Support | Madera County Civil Service Commission | 1999 - Present Nancy provides part-time support to the Commission which included reviewing and approving employment announcements and presiding over employee grievance and appeals issues.

Accounting Manager / Owner | DeCesari Stationery | 1980 - 2003 DeCesari Stationary provided services to the State of California, Nancy was responsible for all accounts receivable, accounts payable, purchasing and bidding.

Attachment 2 - Consultants Proposal ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 3

SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
Scope of Services
Consultant has two key tasks:

1. Provide On-Call Building Department Staffing.
• Consultant will provide building department support staff to include building inspector, permit technicians, Chief Building Official, and on-site plans examiners/engineers on an on-call basis for the City of Manteca. • Consultant will provide interim staff within one business day and full-time staff within two business days. Consultant will provide staff from their database of qualified personnel. For requests less than twenty-four (24) hours’ notice, Consultant will make every effort possible to secure suitable candidates.

2. Provide Plan Review Services.
• The Consultant shall review all plans and supporting documents submitted for projects for which a Building permit is requested. If, after initial review the documents are found to be in substantial compliance with the California Building Code and local ordinances, the plans, and documents shall be stamped as reviewed and accepted for construction. If corrections are found to be needed a report shall be prepared by the Consultant specifying the needed corrections, and shall be transmitted to the applicant. When plans and supporting documents are deemed acceptable for permit issuance, the applicant shall electronically approve the plans and all supporting documents for permit processing.
• Plan Reviews will be subject to the following maximum turn-around times:

Type of Project First Submittal Subsequent
Submittals
Commercial (new building or addition) 12 working days 5 working days Tenant Infill, Remodel, etc. 10 working days 3 working days Residential (new building or master plan) 10 working days 5 working days Residential Addition, Remodel, Patio, etc. 10 working days 3 working days (If Consultant works the City 9/80 schedule over time is over 9 hours per day; otherwise overtime is anything over 8 hours per day).

Plan Checks and Corrections Letter
All plan check work shall occur utilizing the City’s electronic plan check system and all plan check corrections shall utilize this system to identify, comment, or redmark as necessary for coordination with the application.

ATTACHMENT 2
Please ensure that the following information is included on all plans:
o Occupancy Classification
o Occupant Load
o Type of Construction
o Total Square Footage, Including Canopy and Roof Covering (Separate the Square Footage of Building and the Canopy/Roof Covering)
o With or Without Sprinkler System
Consultant shall contact applicant to resolve any outstanding issues/comments after 2nd review.

Special Inspection Agreement (Only if required)
Consultants to provide a correction comment if a Special Inspection Agreement is required as part of the work being performed. (City will provide a copy of the Special Inspection Agreement form and the list of the approved special inspectors to permit applicant).

Approvals
Approval Notification:

Please send the approval letter notifications to the development services technician via email.

ATTACHMENT 2

Manteca City CouncilJune 21, 2022

Manteca City Council
June 21, 2022