Manteca City Council
January 10, 2023

RT60     The time it takes reverberant sound to decay by 60 dB once the source has been removed.

Sabin   The unit of sound absorption. One square foot of material absorbing 100% of incident sound has an absorption of 1 Sabin.

SEL   Sound Exposure Level. SEL is a rating, in decibels, of a discrete event, such as an aircraft flyover or train pass by, that compresses the total sound energy into a one‐second event.

SPC  Speech Privacy Class. SPC is a method of rating speech privacy in buildings. It is designed  to measure the degree of speech  privacy  provided  by  a  closed  room,  indicating  the  degree  to  which  conversations  occurring  within  are  kept private from listeners outside the room.

STC   Sound Transmission Class. STC is an integer rating of how well a building partition attenuates airborne sound. It is widely used  to  rate  interior  partitions,  ceilings/floors,  doors,  windows  and  exterior  wall  configurations.    The  STC  rating  is typically used to rate the sound transmission of a specific building element when tested in laboratory conditions where flanking paths around the assembly don’t exist.   A larger number means more attenuation. The scale, like the decibel scale for sound, is logarithmic.

Threshold  The lowest sound that can be perceived by the human auditory system, generally considered of Hearing   to be 0 dB for persons with perfect hearing.

Threshold   Approximately 120 dB above the threshold of hearing. of Pain
Impulsive   Sound of short duration, usually less than one second, with an abrupt onset and rapid decay.

Simple Tone         Any sound which can be judged as audible as a single pitch or set of single pitches.

Exhibit "B"
Appendix B: Continuous Ambient Noise
Measurement Results
Exhibit "B"
Site: LT-1
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Thursday, May 12, 2022 0:00 59 75 55 51 Coordinates: 37.8440894°, Thursday, May 12, 2022 1:00 56 76 52 50
Thursday, May 12, 2022 2:00 55 72 52 49
Thursday, May 12, 2022 3:00 57 72 54 51
Thursday, May 12, 2022 4:00 58 79 55 51
Thursday, May 12, 2022 5:00 59 75 56 53
Thursday, May 12, 2022 6:00 67 97 56 53
Thursday, May 12, 2022 7:00 61 75 58 53
Thursday, May 12, 2022 8:00 59 78 56 50
Thursday, May 12, 2022 9:00 59 78 55 50
Thursday, May 12, 2022 10:00 59 74 55 49
Thursday, May 12, 2022 11:00 61 76 56 50
Thursday, May 12, 2022 12:00 61 76 57 51
Thursday, May 12, 2022 13:00 62 85 57 50
Thursday, May 12, 2022 14:00 62 80 58 51
Thursday, May 12, 2022 15:00 63 80 59 52
Thursday, May 12, 2022 16:00 64 85 61 58
Thursday, May 12, 2022 17:00 63 75 61 57
Thursday, May 12, 2022 18:00 66 81 63 57
Thursday, May 12, 2022 19:00 65 79 61 54
Thursday, May 12, 2022 20:00 62 77 58 53
Thursday, May 12, 2022 21:00 61 82 57 53
Thursday, May 12, 2022 22:00 59 86 54 52
Thursday, May 12, 2022 23:00 58 81 54 51
Leq Lmax L50 L90
62 79 58 52
60 79 54 51
59 74 55 49
66 85 63 58
55 72 52 49
67 97 56 53
67 75
CNEL 67 Night % 25
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
Night Average
CAL200
-121.2557458°
Thursday, May 12, 2022 Thursday, May 12, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
Appendix B1: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Airport Business Center 2
Northern Project Boundary
LDL 820-5
75 76
72 72
79 75
97 75
78 78
74 76 76
85 80 80
85 75
81 79
77 82
86 81
51 50 49
51 51
53 53 53
50 50 49 50 51 50 51 52
58 57 57
54 53 53
52 51
59 56 55 57
58 59
67 61
59 59 59 61 61 62 62 63 64 63
66 65
62 61
59 58
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-1
Exhibit "B"
Appendix C: Traffic Noise Calculation
Inputs and Results
Exhibit "B"
Project #:

Description:Ldn/CNEL: LdnHard/Soft: Soft
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
Level,
dBA
1 Roth Road Between Intermodal and Airport Way 9,700 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 883 0 253 117 54 51.9 2 Roth Road Between Intermodal and McKinley Ave 9,600 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 100 0 251 117 54 66.0 3 Roth Road Between McKinley Ave. and Harlan Road 9,800 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 1130 0 255 118 55 50.3 4 Roth Road Between Harlan Rd. and NB I‐5 Off/On‐Ramps 14,800 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 808 0 335 156 72 54.3 5 Roth Road Between NB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps 8,500 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 582 0 232 107 50 54.0 6 Airport Way French Camp Road and Roth Road 7,400 75 0 25 1.0% 3.5% 25 50 0 107 50 23 64.9 7 Airport Way Roth Road and Lovelace Road 6,700 75 0 25 1.0% 15.4% 55 290 0 359 167 77 61.4 8 Airport Way Lovelace Rd. and Daisywood Dr. 7,000 75 0 25 1.0% 15.4% 55 90 ‐5 370 172 80 64.2 9 Airport Way Pinnacle Dr. and Lathrop Rd. 7,500 75 0 25 1.0% 3.3% 45 155 0 183 85 39 61.1 10 Airport Way #REF! 8,800 75 0 25 1.0% 9.2% 45 90 0 283 131 61 67.511 Airport Way Lathrop Rd. and Northgate Dr. 9,800 75 0 25 1.0% 9.2% 45 97 0 304 141 65 67.4 12 Airport Way Northgate Dr. and Louise Ave. 10,500 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 70 0 189 88 41 66.5 13 Airport Way Louise Ave. and Crom Ave. 14,800 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 50 ‐5 238 110 51 65.2 14 Airport Way Crom Ave. and Yosemite Ave. 15,600 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 65 0 246 114 53 68.7 15 Lathrop Road Union Rd. and Airport Way 16,700 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 80 0 422 196 91 70.8 16 Lathrop Road Airpory Way and McKinley Ave. 21,400 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 1900 0 498 231 107 51.317 Lathrop Road McKinley Ave. and 5th Street 21,000 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 130 0 492 228 106 68.7 18 Lathrop Road 5th Street and Harlan Rd. 20,600 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 70 ‐5 485 225 105 67.6 19 Lathrop Road Harlan Rd. and NB I‐5 Off/On‐Ramps 24,500 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 475 ‐5 545 253 117 55.9 20 Lathrop Road Between NB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps 16,200 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 965 ‐5 414 192 89 49.5 21 Spartan Way SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and Golden Valley Parkway 9,200 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1600 ‐5 66 31 14 34.2 22 Intermodal Way Roth Road and 5.11 Tactical Building 1,650 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1560 0 21 10 5 31.9 23 Intermodal Way 5.11 Tactical Building and Tacical Way 950 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1470 0 15 7 3 29.9 Segment Roadway Segment
Appendix C‐1
220411
FHWA‐RD‐77‐108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model
Airport Business Center 2 ‐ Existing
Contours (ft.) ‐ No
Offset
Offset
Speed Distance (dB)
% Hvy.

Trucks
% Med.

Trucks
Night
%
Eve
%
Day
ADT %
Exhibit "B"
Project #:

Description:Ldn/CNEL: LdnHard/Soft: Soft
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
Level,
dBA
1 Roth Road Between Intermodal and Airport Way 9,863 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 883 0 256 119 55 51.9 2 Roth Road Between Intermodal and McKinley Ave 9,925 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 100 0 257 119 55 66.1 3 Roth Road Between McKinley Ave. and Harlan Road 10,125 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 1130 0 260 121 56 50.4 4 Roth Road Between Harlan Rd. and NB I‐5 Off/On‐Ramps 15,125 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 808 0 340 158 73 54.4 5 Roth Road Between NB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps 8,608 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 582 0 234 108 50 54.1 6 Airport Way French Camp Road and Roth Road 7,563 75 0 25 1.0% 3.5% 25 50 0 108 50 23 65.0 7 Airport Way Roth Road and Lovelace Road 6,918 75 0 25 1.0% 15.4% 55 290 0 367 170 79 61.5 8 Airport Way Lovelace Rd. and Daisywood Dr. 7,218 75 0 25 1.0% 15.4% 55 90 ‐5 377 175 81 64.3 9 Airport Way Daisywood Dr. and Pinnacle Dr. 8,370 75 0 25 1.0% 3.3% 45 155 0 197 91 42 61.6 10 Airport Way Pinnacle Dr. and Lathrop Rd. 9,670 75 0 25 1.0% 9.2% 45 90 0 301 140 65 67.9 11 Airport Way Lathrop Rd. and Northgate Dr. 10,181 75 0 25 1.0% 9.2% 45 97 0 312 145 67 67.6 12 Airport Way Northgate Dr. and Louise Ave. 10,881 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 70 0 194 90 42 66.6 13 Airport Way Louise Ave. and Crom Ave. 15,181 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 50 ‐5 242 112 52 65.3 14 Airport Way Crom Ave. and Yosemite Ave. 15,981 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 65 0 250 116 54 68.8 15 Lathrop Road Union Rd. and Airport Way 16,972 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 80 0 427 198 92 70.9 16 Lathrop Road Airpory Way and McKinley Ave. 21,618 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 1900 0 501 233 108 51.3 17 Lathrop Road McKinley Ave. and 5th Street 21,196 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 130 0 495 230 107 68.7 18 Lathrop Road 5th Street and Harlan Rd. 20,796 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 70 ‐5 488 227 105 67.7 19 Lathrop Road Harlan Rd. and NB I‐5 Off/On‐Ramps 24,696 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 475 ‐5 548 254 118 55.9 20 Lathrop Road Between NB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps 16,298 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 965 ‐5 415 193 89 49.5 21 Spartan Way SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and Golden Valley Parkway 9,222 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1600 ‐5 66 31 14 34.3 22 Intermodal Way Roth Road and 5.11 Tactical Building 1,920 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1560 0 23 11 5 32.6 23 Intermodal Way 5.11 Tactical Building and Tacical Way 1,220 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1470 0 17 8 4 31.0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 026 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 027 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 028 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0 Offset
(dB)
Contours (ft.) ‐ No
Offset
Eve
%
Night
%
% Med.

Trucks
% Hvy.

Trucks Speed Distance
Appendix C‐2
FHWA‐RD‐77‐108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model
220411Airport Business Center 2 ‐ Existing + Project
Segment Roadway Segment ADT
Day
%
Exhibit "B"
Project #:

Description:Ldn/CNEL: LdnHard/Soft: Soft
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
Level,
dBA
1 Roth Road Between Intermodal and Airport Way 17,790 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 883 0 379 176 82 54.5 2 Roth Road Between Intermodal and McKinley Ave 17,420 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 100 0 374 173 80 68.6 3 Roth Road Between McKinley Ave. and Harlan Road 19,380 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 1130 0 401 186 86 53.3 4 Roth Road Between Harlan Rd. and NB I‐5 Off/On‐Ramps 24,600 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 808 0 470 218 101 56.5 5 Roth Road Between NB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps 32,610 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 582 0 568 263 122 59.86 Airport Way French Camp Road and Roth Road 17,640 75 0 25 1.0% 3.5% 25 50 0 191 88 41 68.7 7 Airport Way Roth Road and Lovelace Road 19,800 75 0 25 1.0% 15.4% 55 290 0 740 343 159 66.1 8 Airport Way Lovelace Rd. and Daisywood Dr. 16,010 75 0 25 1.0% 15.4% 55 90 ‐5 642 298 138 67.8 9 Airport Way Daisywood Dr. and Pinnacle Dr. 15,980 75 0 25 1.0% 3.3% 45 155 0 303 141 65 64.4 10 Airport Way Pinnacle Dr. and Lathrop Rd. 24,980 75 0 25 1.0% 9.2% 45 90 0 567 263 122 72.0 11 Airport Way Lathrop Rd. and Northgate Dr. 22,190 75 0 25 1.0% 9.2% 45 97 0 524 243 113 71.0 12 Airport Way Northgate Dr. and Louise Ave. 20,840 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 70 0 299 139 64 69.4 13 Airport Way Louise Ave. and Crom Ave. 23,300 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 50 ‐5 322 149 69 67.1 14 Airport Way Crom Ave. and Yosemite Ave. 23,180 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 65 0 321 149 69 70.4 15 Lathrop Road Union Rd. and Airport Way 21,650 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 80 0 502 233 108 72.0 16 Lathrop Road Airpory Way and McKinley Ave. 24,460 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 1900 0 544 253 117 51.9 17 Lathrop Road McKinley Ave. and 5th Street 26,030 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 130 0 567 263 122 69.6 18 Lathrop Road 5th Street and Harlan Rd. 25,410 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 70 ‐5 558 259 120 68.5 19 Lathrop Road Harlan Rd. and NB I‐5 Off/On‐Ramps 35,350 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 475 ‐5 696 323 150 57.5 20 Lathrop Road Between NB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps 39,330 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 965 ‐5 747 347 161 53.3 21 Spartan Way SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and Golden Valley Parkway 47,830 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1600 ‐5 199 92 43 41.422 Intermodal Way Roth Road and 5.11 Tactical Building 2,380 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1560 0 27 12 6 33.5 23 Intermodal Way 5.11 Tactical Building and Tacical Way 1,780 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1470 0 22 10 5 32.7 Offset
(dB)
Contours (ft.) ‐ No
Offset
Eve
%
Night
%
% Med.

Trucks
% Hvy.

Trucks Speed Distance
Appendix C‐3
FHWA‐RD‐77‐108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model
220411Airport Business Center 2 ‐ Cumulative
Segment Roadway Segment ADT
Day
%
Exhibit "B"
Project #:

Description:Ldn/CNEL: LdnHard/Soft: Soft
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
Level,
dBA
1 Roth Road Between Intermodal and Airport Way 17,953 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 883 0 381 177 82 54.5 2 Roth Road Between Intermodal and McKinley Ave 17,745 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 100 0 378 176 81 68.7 3 Roth Road Between McKinley Ave. and Harlan Road 19,705 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 1130 0 406 188 87 53.3 4 Roth Road Between Harlan Rd. and NB I‐5 Off/On‐Ramps 24,925 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 808 0 474 220 102 56.5 5 Roth Road Between NB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps 32,718 83 0 17 1.0% 16.0% 25 582 0 569 264 123 59.96 Airport Way French Camp Road and Roth Road 17,803 75 0 25 1.0% 3.5% 25 50 0 192 89 41 68.8 7 Airport Way Roth Road and Lovelace Road 20,018 75 0 25 1.0% 15.4% 55 290 0 745 346 161 66.1 8 Airport Way Lovelace Rd. and Daisywood Dr. 16,228 75 0 25 1.0% 15.4% 55 90 ‐5 648 301 140 67.9 9 Airport Way Daisywood Dr. and Pinnacle Dr. 16,850 75 0 25 1.0% 3.3% 45 155 0 314 146 68 64.6 10 Airport Way Pinnacle Dr. and Lathrop Rd. 25,850 75 0 25 1.0% 9.2% 45 90 0 580 269 125 72.1 11 Airport Way Lathrop Rd. and Northgate Dr. 22,571 75 0 25 1.0% 9.2% 45 97 0 530 246 114 71.1 12 Airport Way Northgate Dr. and Louise Ave. 21,221 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 70 0 302 140 65 69.5 13 Airport Way Louise Ave. and Crom Ave. 23,681 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 50 ‐5 325 151 70 67.2 14 Airport Way Crom Ave. and Yosemite Ave. 23,561 75 0 25 1.0% 1.0% 45 65 0 324 150 70 70.5 15 Lathrop Road Union Rd. and Airport Way 21,922 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 80 0 506 235 109 72.0 16 Lathrop Road Airpory Way and McKinley Ave. 24,678 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 1900 0 548 254 118 51.9 17 Lathrop Road McKinley Ave. and 5th Street 26,226 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 130 0 570 265 123 69.6 18 Lathrop Road 5th Street and Harlan Rd. 25,606 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 70 ‐5 561 260 121 68.6 19 Lathrop Road Harlan Rd. and NB I‐5 Off/On‐Ramps 35,546 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 475 ‐5 698 324 150 57.5 20 Lathrop Road Between NB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps 39,428 75 0 25 1.0% 8.6% 45 965 ‐5 748 347 161 53.3 21 Spartan Way SB I‐5 Off/On Ramps and Golden Valley Parkway 47,852 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1600 ‐5 199 92 43 41.422 Intermodal Way Roth Road and 5.11 Tactical Building 2,650 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1560 0 29 13 6 34.0 23 Intermodal Way 5.11 Tactical Building and Tacical Way 2,050 82 0 18 1.0% 1.0% 25 1470 0 24 11 5 33.3 Offset
(dB)
Contours (ft.) ‐ No
Offset
Eve
%
Night
%
% Med.

Trucks
% Hvy.

Trucks Speed Distance
Appendix C‐4
FHWA‐RD‐77‐108 Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model
220411Airport Business Center 2 ‐ Cumulative + Project
Segment Roadway Segment ADT
Day
%
Exhibit "B"

AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH PROJECT INITIAL STUDY
PAGE 145
APPENDIX D: MMRP FOR THE NORTHWEST AIRPORT WAY MASTER PLAN Exhibit "B"
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
for the
Northwest Airport Way Master Plan
City of Manteca, San Joaquin County, California
State Clearinghouse No. 2010022024
Prepared for:

City of Manteca
Community Development Department
1001 West Center Street
Manteca, CA 95337
209.456.8516
Contact: Rochelle Henson, Senior Planner
Prepared by:

Michael Brandman Associates
Bishop Ranch 3
2633 Camino Ramon, Suite 460
San Ramon, CA 94583
925.830.2733
Contact: Jason Brandman, Project Director
October 7, 2010
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 1 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1: Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of
Mitigation Measures Method of Completion Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial

2. Agricultural Resources MM AG-1: At the time building permits are sought for any Master Plan contemplated use, the project applicant shall pay the required City of Manteca agricultural mitigation fee to help offset the conversion of Important Farmland pursuant to Manteca Municipal Code Chapter 13.42.

Receipt of fees At the time building
permits are sought
City of Manteca Community Development Department

3. Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions MM AIR-1a: Prior to issuance of grading permits for each Master Plan use, the project applicant shall provide information to the City of Manteca describing the methods by which the following measures will be complied with: • Off-road equipment used onsite shall achieve a fleet average emissions equal to or less than the Tier II emissions standard of 4.8 grams of NOx per horsepower hour. This can be achieved through any combination of engine standards. Tier II emission standards are set forth in Section 2423 of Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, and Part 89 of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations. • Construction equipment shall be properly maintained at an offsite location; maintenance shall include proper tuning and timing of engines. Equipment maintenance records and data sheets of equipment design specifications shall be kept on-site during construction. • Onsite construction equipment shall not idle for more than 5 minutes in any one hour.
• During the building phase, onsite electrical hook ups shall be provided for electric construction tools including saws, drills and compressors, to eliminate the need for diesel powered electric generators. • Construction workers shall be encouraged to carpool to and from the construction site to the greatest extent practical. Workers shall be informed in writing and a letter shall be placed on file in the City office documenting efforts to carpool.

Notes on construction plans; submittal of documentation Prior to issuance of grading permits for each Master Plan use City of Manteca Community Development Department & Public Works Engineering Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 2 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial MM AIR-1b: During the architectural coating phase for all Master Plan uses, paints with a volatile organic compound content less than 10 grams per liter shall be used.

Notes on construction plans; site inspection
During the architectural coating phase for all Master Plan uses City of Manteca Community Development Department Building Division MM AIR-1c: Prior to issuance of building permits for each Master Plan building, the project applicant shall demonstrate compliance with all applicable requirements of San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Rule 9510 via the submittal of a Rule 9510 Implementation Plan to the City of Manteca for review and approval. The implementation plan shall achieve a 33-percent reduction in NOx and a 45-percent reduction in PM10 over the first 10 years of operations through the use of onsite emissions reduction measures or through the payment of offsite mitigation fees to the SJVAPCD for purchase of emission reductions. The requirements of the approved implementation plan shall be incorporated into the proposed project.

Submittal of documentation
Prior to issuance of building permits for each Master Plan building City of Manteca Community Development Department
MM AIR-1d: Prior to approval of the final site plan for each Master Plan building that would receive 10 more truck deliveries per week, the project applicant shall demonstrate that the following anti-idling measures would be implemented: • Provide available electricity hookups for trucks in the loading dock areas.
• Signs shall be posted in dock areas advising drivers that idling shall not occur for more than 3 minutes.
• Telephone numbers of the building facilities manager and the California Air Resources Board shall be posted on signs at truck entrances to report idling violations.

Approval of plans Prior to approval
of the final site plan for each Master Plan building that would receive 10 more truck deliveries per week City of Manteca Community Development Department
Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 3 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial MM AIR-6: Prior to final site plan approval for any Master Plan use that includes food service (i.e., restaurants, cafeterias, etc.), the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with SJVAPCD Rules 4102 (Nuisance) and 4692 (Commercial Charbroiling) to the extent that these rules are applicable. Compliance may entail the installation of kitchen exhaust vents, exhaust filtration systems, or other odor-reduction measures in accordance with accepted engineering practice. The approved plans shall be incorporated into the proposed project.

Approval of plans Prior to final site
plan approval for any Master Plan use that includes food service (i.e., restaurants, cafeterias, etc.) City of Manteca Community Development Department Building Division

4. Biological Resources MM BIO-1a: If ground clearing or vegetation removal activities occur during the nesting season (February 15 through August 31), then pre-construction surveys for nesting birds shall be conducted in all area suitable for nesting that are located within 250 feet of the Master Plan area. Surveys shall be conducted no more than 15 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance. If an active nest is located, a 250-foot buffer shall be delineated and maintained around the nest until a qualified biologist has determined that fledging has occurred. Alternatively, CDFG may be consulted to determine if the protective buffer can be reduced based upon individual species responses to disturbance. This mitigation measure does not apply if ground clearing or vegetation removal activities occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through February 14).

Site inspection; submittal of documentation
If ground clearing or vegetation removal activities occur during the nesting season (February 15 through August 31), City of Manteca Community Development Department; California Department of Fish and Game MM BIO-1b: No more than 30 day prior to the beginning of ground disturbance, a pre-construction survey for burrowing owls shall be conducted by a qualified biologist in general accordance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines by the California Burrowing Owl Consortium. Should the surveys be scheduled to occur during the period extending from February 1 through May 1, then surveys shall be conducted Site inspection; submittal of documentation
No more than 30 day prior to the beginning of ground disturbance City of Manteca Community Development Department; California Department of Fish and Game Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 4 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial no more that 15 days prior to the start of ground disturbance. Surveys shall be conducted from 2 hours before sunset to 1 hour after sunset, or from 1 hour before sunrise to 2 hours after sunrise, and shall be conducted during weather conducive to observing owls outside of their burrows. No surveys shall occur during heavy rain, high winds, or dense fog. If occupied burrows are found, mitigation for potential impacts shall follow the guidelines outlined by the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines, including passive relocation. MM BIO-2: Prior to issuance of grading permits within any impacted resource area, the project applicant shall obtain all required authorization from agencies with jurisdiction over the drainage canals within the Master Plan area. Such agencies may include but are not limited to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the California Department of Fish and Game, and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Impacted resources shall be offset through onsite restoration, offsite restoration, or purchase of credits at an agency-approved mitigation bank in the region at no less than a 1:1 ratio.

Submittal of documentation
Prior to issuance of grading permits within any impacted resource area City of Manteca Community Development Department; United States Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game; Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board MM BIO-3: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall obtain all required authorization from agencies with jurisdiction over the drainage canals within the Master Plan area. This authorization may involve approvals from the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Impacted features shall be offset through onsite restoration, offsite restoration, or purchase of credits at an agency-approved mitigation bank in the region at no less than a 1:1 ratio.

Submittal of documentation
Prior to issuance of grading permits
City of Manteca Community Development; United States Army Corps of Engineers, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Department Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 5 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial MM BIO-5: Prior to issuance of grading permits for any activities that would remove one or more trees subject to City of Manteca Ordinance 17.19.060, the applicant shall prepare and submit a tree removal and replacement plan to the City of Manteca for review and approval. The plan shall identify all trees proposed for removal and proposed replacement tree species and locations. Replacement shall occur at no less than a 1:1 ratio. All replacement trees shall be no less than a 24-inch box size species.

Approval of plan Prior to issuance of
grading permits for any activities that would remove one or more trees subject to City of Manteca Ordinance 17.19.060 City of Manteca Community Development Department
MM BIO-6: Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit for the Master Plan, the project applicant shall obtain coverage under the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan. Coverage shall consist of approval of the Master Plan-specific “Section 8.2.1 (10) Checklist for Unmapped SJMSCP Projects” by the San Joaquin Council of Governments Technical Advisory Committee. The applicant shall pay all required fees to the San Joaquin Council of Governments prior to the commencement of construction activities.

Approval of application; receipt of fees
Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit for the Master Plan City of Manteca Community Development Department Planning and building Divisions, Public Works Engineering; San Joaquin Council of Governments

5. Cultural Resources MM CUL-1: If potentially significant historic resources are encountered during subsurface excavation activities for any Master Plan use, all construction activities within a 100-foot radius of the resource shall cease until a qualified archaeologist determines whether the resource requires further study. The City shall require that the applicant include a standard inadvertent discovery clause in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction shall be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Site inspection; submittal of documentation
During subsurface excavation activities
City of Manteca Community Development Department Planning and Building Division & Public Works Engineering Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 6 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial Recreation forms and evaluated for significance in terms of California Environmental Quality Act criteria by a qualified archaeologist. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. If the resource is determined to be significant under CEQA, the City and a qualified archaeologist shall determine whether preservation in place is feasible. Such preservation in place is the preferred mitigation. If such preservation is infeasible, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare and implement a research design and archaeological data recovery plan for the resource. The archaeologist shall also conduct appropriate technical analyses, prepare a comprehensive written report and file it with the appropriate information center (California Historical Resources Information System), and provide for the permanent curation of the recovered materials. MM CUL-2: If potentially significant archaeological resources are encountered during subsurface excavation activities, all construction activities within a 100-foot radius of the resource shall cease until a qualified archaeologist determines whether the resource requires further study. The City shall require that the applicant include a standard inadvertent discovery clause in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction shall be recorded on appropriate Department of Parks and Recreation forms and evaluated for significance in terms of California Environmental Quality Act criteria by a qualified archaeologist. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. If the resource is Site inspection; submittal of documentation
During subsurface excavation activities
City of Manteca Community Development Department Planning and Building Division & Public Works Engineering Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 7 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial determined to be significant under CEQA, the City and a qualified archaeologist shall determine whether preservation in place is feasible. Such preservation in place is the preferred mitigation. If such preservation is infeasible, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare and implement a research design and archaeological data recovery plan for the resource. The archaeologist shall also conduct appropriate technical analyses, prepare a comprehensive written report and file it with the appropriate information center (California Historical Resources Information System), and provide for the permanent curation of the recovered materials. MM CUL-3: In the event that plant or animal fossils are discovered during subsurface excavation activities for the proposed project, all excavation within 50 feet of the fossil shall cease until a qualified paleontologist has determined the significance of the find and provides recommendations in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The paleontologist shall notify the City of Manteca to determine procedures to be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the find is determined to be significant and the City determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall design and implement a data recovery plan consistent with the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. Upon approval, the plan shall be incorporated into the project.

Site inspection; submittal of documentation
During subsurface excavation activities
City of Manteca Community Development Department Planning and Building Division & Public Works Engineering Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 8 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial MM CUL-4: If previously unknown human remains are encountered during construction activities, Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code applies, and the following procedures shall be followed: • In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, Public Resource Code Section 5097.98 must be followed. Once project-related ground disturbance begins and if there is accidental discovery of human remains, the following steps shall be taken:
• There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the San Joaquin County Coroner’s Office is contacted to determine if the remains are Native American and if an investigation into cause of death is required. If the coroner determines the remains are Native American, the coroner shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the “most likely descendant” of the deceased Native American. The most likely descendant may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

Site inspection; submittal of documentation
During construction activities
City of Manteca Community Development Department Planning and Building Division & Public Works Engineering

6. Geology, Soils, and Seismicity MM GEO-1: Prior to issuance of building permits for each Master Plan use, the project applicant shall submit a designlevel geotechnical study and building plans to the City of Manteca for review and approval. The building plans shall demonstrate that they incorporate all applicable Approval of plans Prior to issuance of
building permits for each Master Plan use
City of Manteca Community Development Department Building Division Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 9 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial recommendations of the design-level geotechnical study and comply with all applicable requirements of the most recent version of the California Building Standards Code. A licensed professional engineer shall prepare the plans, including those that pertain to soil engineering, structural foundations, pipeline excavation, and installation. The approved plans shall be incorporated into the proposed project. All onsite soil engineering activities shall be conducted under the supervision of a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or Certified Engineering Geologist. 7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials MM HAZ-1a: Prior to grading activities for any Master Plan use in areas where THP-D has been detected, the applicant shall conduct soil sampling to delineate the horizontal and vertical extent of the TPH-D in order to implement a soil remediation program. Soil remediation shall be conducted in accordance with California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) guidelines. Contaminated soil shall be excavated and disposed of at an approved disposal facility. Following excavation, confirmation sampling shall be conducted to confirm whether remaining soil meets acceptable applicable regulatory levels. The excavation shall be backfilled with clean soil.

Submittal of documentation
Prior to grading activities for any Master Plan use in areas where THPD has been detected City of Manteca Community Development Department, Public Works Engineering MM HAZ-1b: Prior to grading activities for any Master Plan use, any onsite wells or septic systems intended to be removed shall be destroyed under permit and inspection with San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department.

Submittal of documentation
Prior to grading activities for any Master Plan use
City of Manteca Community Development Department; San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 10 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial MM HAZ-1c: Prior to demolition activities of any structures located within the Master Plan area, the project applicant shall retain a certified hazardous waste contractor to determine the presence or absence of building materials or equipment that contains hazardous waste, including asbestos, lead-based paint, mercury, and PCBs. If such substances are found to be present, the contractor shall properly remove and dispose of these hazardous materials in accordance with federal and state law. All removal activities shall be completed prior to commencement of demolition activities.

Submittal of documentation
Prior to demolition activities of any structures located within the Master Plan area City of Manteca Community Development Department Building Division

8. Hydrology and Water Quality MM HYD-1: Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits for each proposed activities within the Master Plan area, the project applicant shall prepare and submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City of Manteca that identifies specific actions and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent stormwater pollution during construction activities. The SWPPP shall identify a practical sequence for BMP implementation, monitoring, and maintenance; site restoration; contingency measures; responsible parties; and agency contacts. The SWPPP shall include but not be limited to the following elements: • Temporary erosion control measures shall be employed for disturbed areas.
• Specific measures shall be identified to protect the onsite open drainages during construction of the proposed resort. • Specific measures shall be identified to protect the French Camp Outlet Canal and Drain 3 during any construction activities.

Approval of plan Prior to the
issuance of grading or building permits for each proposed activities within the Master Plan area City of Manteca Public Works
Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 11 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial • No disturbed surfaces shall be left without erosion control measures in place during the winter and spring months.
• Sediment shall be retained onsite by a system of sediment basins, traps, or other appropriate measures.
• The construction contractor shall prepare Standard Operating Procedures for the handling of hazardous materials on the construction site to eliminate or reduce discharge of materials to storm drains. • BMP performance and effectiveness shall be determined either by visual means where applicable (e.g., observation of above-normal sediment release), or by actual water sampling in cases where verification of contaminant reduction or elimination (such as inadvertent petroleum release) is required by the RWQCB to determine adequacy of the measure. • In the event of significant construction delays or delays in final landscape installation, native grasses or other appropriate vegetative cover shall be established on the construction site as soon as possible after disturbance, as an interim erosion control measure throughout the wet season.

MM HYD-2: Prior to the issuance of building or grading permits for any development activities that occur pursuant to the Master Plan, the project applicant shall submit a stormwater quality control plan to the City of Manteca for review and approval. The plan shall include a detailed drainage plan and identify expected site-specific pollutants and required measures to treat those pollutants before they reach the regional detention basins and, ultimately, the French Camp Outlet Canal and San Joaquin River. The approved measures shall be incorporated Approval of plan Prior to the
issuance of building or grading permits
City of Manteca Public Works
Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 12 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial into the proposed project. The plan will describe monitoring and performance measures and standards required in order to ensure water quality is adequately protected during operation of all proposed sites within the project area. Examples of stormwater pollution prevention measures and practices to be incorporated into the plan include but are not limited to: • Strategically placed bioswales and landscaped areas that promote percolation of runoff
• Pervious pavement • Roof drains that discharge to landscaped areas • Trash enclosures with screen walls and roofs • Stenciling on storm drains • Curb cuts in parking areas to allow runoff to enter landscaped areas
• Rock-lined areas along landscaped areas in parking lots • Catch basins • Oil/water separators • Regular sweeping of parking areas and cleaning of storm drainage facilities
• Employee training to inform maintenance personnel of
stormwater pollution prevention measures
Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 13 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial MM HYD-4: Prior to the issuance of building or grading permits for the proposed project, the project applicant shall submit a stormwater quality control plan for the project as a whole to the City of Manteca for review and approval. The plan shall include a detailed drainage plan that demonstrates attainment of pre-project runoff requirements prior to release at the outlet canal and describes the volume reduction measures and treatment controls used to reach attainment. The drainage plan shall identify all expected flows from the project area and the location, size, and type of facilities used to retain and treat the runoff volumes and peak flows to meet pre-project conditions. The approved drainage plan shall be incorporated into the proposed project.

Approval of plan Prior to the
issuance of building or grading permits
City of Manteca Public Works
MM HYD-5a: Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the project applicant must revisit the status of the provisionally accredited levees providing 100-year level of flood protection to the Master Plan area to determine it is still the case and the Master Plan remains outside of the 100-year flood hazard.

Submittal of documentation
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits
City of Manteca Community Development Department & Public Works MM HYD-5b: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall either demonstrate that the developed portions of the Master Plan are outside of the anticipated 200-year flood hazard area or incorporate measures into the Master Plan to achieve a 200-year level of flood protection for any site installations that will occur in 2012 or later.

Submittal of documentation
Prior to the issuance of grading permits
City of Manteca Community Development Department & Public Works Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 14 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial

10. Noise MM NOI-1: During construction activities for all Master Plan uses, the applicant shall require its construction contractors to adhere to the following noise attenuation requirements: • Construction activities shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. daily. The City of Manteca Director of Public Works shall have the discretion to permit construction activities to occur outside of allowable hours if compelling circumstances warrant such an exception (e.g., weather conditions necessary to pour concrete). • All construction equipment shall use noise-reduction features (e.g., mufflers and engine shrouds) that are no less effective than those originally installed by the manufacturer. If no noise-reduction features were installed by the manufacturer, then the contractor shall require that at least a muffler be installed on the equipment. • Construction staging and heavy equipment maintenance
activities shall be performed a minimum distance of 300 feet from the nearest residence, unless safety or technical factors take precedence (e.g., an equipment breakdown). • A 10-foot-high construction noise barrier shall be installed along the edge of the Master Plan area within 300 feet of any offsite residence prior to start of grading activities. The noise barrier shall either be constructed of a minimum 0.5-inch plywood or utilize acoustical blankets with a minimum Sound Transmission Class of 12. The barrier shall remain in place until noise intensive aspects of construction are completed.

Notes on construction plans; site inspection
During construction activities for all Master Plan uses City of Manteca Community Development Department Building Division & Public Works Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 15 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial MM NOI-4: During Master Plan operations, the use of street sweepers and mechanical landscape maintenance equipment (lawnmowers, leaf blowers, etc.) shall be prohibited between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.

Site inspection During Master
Plan operations
City of Manteca Community Development Department

11. Public Services and Utilities MM PSU-1: Prior to issuance of building permits for any Master Plan uses, the project applicant shall provide the City of Manteca will all applicable fire protection development fees in accordance with the latest adopted fee schedule.

Receipt of fees Prior to issuance of
building permits for any Master Plan uses
City of Manteca Community Development Department
MM PSU-3a: Prior to issuance of building permits for each Master Plan use, the applicant shall prepare and submit documentation to the City of Manteca for review and approval identifying a non-potable irrigation system that is separate from the potable water systems. The non-potable irrigation system shall use non-potable well water until recycled water is available, at which point it shall be converted to use recycled water.

Submittal of documentation
Prior to issuance of building permits for each Master Plan use City of Manteca Community Development Department & Public Works MM PSU-3b: Prior to issuance of building permits for each Master Plan use, the applicant shall prepare and submit documentation to the City of Manteca for review and approval identifying that all appropriate and feasible water conservation measures are incorporated into the proposed use(s). The approved measures shall be incorporated into the final development plans. Examples of water conservation measures include but are not limited to: • Drought-tolerant landscaping or xeriscaping • Water efficient irrigation systems (drip irrigation, Submittal of documentation
Prior to issuance of building permits for each Master Plan use City of Manteca Community Development Department
Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 16 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial bubbler/soaker systems, hydrozones, evapotranspiration controllers, etc.) • Sensor-activated low-flow fixtures (e.g., faucets, urinals, and toilets)
MM PSU-6a: Prior to issuance of building permits for any building developed pursuant to the Master Plan, the project applicant shall retain a qualified contractor to perform construction and demolition debris recycling. Following the completion of construction activities, the project applicant shall provide documentation to the satisfaction of the City of Manteca demonstrating that construction and demolition debris was recycled.

Submittal of documentation
Prior to issuance of building permits for any building developed pursuant to the Master Plan City of Manteca Community Development Department
MM PSU-6b: Prior to issuance of building permits for each building developed pursuant to the Master Plan, the project applicant shall provide information to the City of Manteca describing the methods by which recycling and waste diversion activities shall be achieved. This information shall include but is not limited to the type and location of facilities necessary to collect and store recyclable materials, contractors who would pick-up recyclable and reusable materials, and how recycling and waste diversion activities would be integrated into operational practices. To the extent feasible, centralized recycling facilities are encouraged to enhance the ease and efficiency of such practices. The approved facilities and practices shall be incorporated into the uses envisioned by the Master Plan.

Approval of plan Prior to issuance of
building permits for each building developed pursuant to the Master Plan City of Manteca Community Development Department
Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 17 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial

12. Transportation MM TRANS-1: Prior to issuance of building permits for each Master Plan use, the applicant shall pay all transportationrelated fees in accordance with the latest adopted fee schedule at the time permits are sought. Such fees shall include, but not be limited to, the City of Manteca Public Facilities Implementation Plan fee and the San Joaquin County Regional Transportation Impact Fee.

Receipt of fees Prior to issuance of
building permits for each Master Plan use
City of Manteca Community Development Department Building Division MM TRANS-2a: Prior to issuance of building permits for each Master Plan use, the applicant shall provide fees to the City of Manteca for the installation of signals at the I-5 Northbound Ramps/Roth Road and I-5 Southbound Ramps/Roth Road intersections, provided that fee collection mechanism exists. Fee amounts shall be calculated in accordance with equitable share methodology. This mitigation measure shall be superseded by Mitigation Measure TRANS-1 if no fee collection mechanism exists for this improvement at the time building permits are sought.

Receipt of fees Prior to issuance of
building permits for each Master Plan use
City of Manteca Community Development Department & Public Works MM TRANS-2b: Prior to issuance of building permits for each Master Plan use, the applicant shall provide fees to the City of Manteca for improvements to the Roth Road/Harland Road intersection, provided that fee collection mechanism exists. The improvements shall consist of the installation of a signal and widening the westbound approach to include left-turn lane, through lane, and shared through/right lane. Fee amounts shall be calculated in accordance with equitable share methodology. This mitigation measure shall be superseded by Mitigation Measure TRANS-1 if no fee collection mechanism exists for this improvement at the time building permits are sought.

Receipt of fees Prior to issuance of
building permits for each Master Plan use
City of Manteca Community Development Department
Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 18 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial MM TRANS-4a: Prior to site plan review for each Master Plan use, the applicant shall consult with the City of Manteca Community Development Department about appropriate frontage improvements. All necessary frontage improvements shall be depicted on the final site plan and implemented as part of site development.

Approval of plan Prior to site plan
review for each Master Plan use
City of Manteca Community Development Department & Public Works MM TRANS-4b: Prior to site plan review for each Master Plan use, the applicant shall consult with the City of Manteca Community Development Department and public Works about the following roadway access issues listed below. The access evaluations shall be performed in accordance with the City’s Transportation Impact Study Guidelines. All necessary improvements shall be depicted on the final site plan and implemented as part of site development. Issues include but are not limited to: • Need for traffic signals at driveways • Traffic signal coordination and installation of associated signal conduits
• Truck traffic volumes at driveways and associated lane storage requirements, right-turn deceleration needs, and curb return radii • Coordination and accommodation of driveways for future projects on the opposite side of the street
• Pavement thickness
Approval of plan Prior to site plan
review for each Master Plan use
City of Manteca Community Development Department & Public Works Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 19 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial MM TRANS-6a: Prior to site plan review for each Master Plan light industrial use, the applicant shall consult with the City of Manteca Community Development Department, City of Manteca Public Works, Manteca Transit, and the San Joaquin Regional Transit District about the inclusion of appropriate transit facilities (turnouts, shelters, etc.) or services (e.g., an employee shuttle). If transit facilities are deemed to be necessary, they shall be provided on the final site plan. If transit services are deemed to be necessary, the applicant shall prepare a service plan and submit it to the City of Manteca for review and approval. The approved plan shall be incorporated into the project. To the extent feasible, transit facilities and services shall be coordinated among Master Plan uses to maximize efficiency and effectiveness.

Approval of plan Prior to site plan
review for each Master Plan light industrial use
City of Manteca Community Development Department & Public Works MM TRANS-6b: Prior to site plan review for each Master Plan light industrial use, the applicant shall consult with the City of Manteca Community Development Department about the inclusion of appropriate bicycle facilities (racks, lockers, etc.). If bicycle facilities are deemed to be necessary, such facilities shall be provided on the final site plan.

Approval of plan Prior to site plan
review for each Master Plan light industrial use
City of Manteca Community Development Department
MM TRANS-6c: Prior to site plan review for each Master Plan light industrial use, the applicant shall consult with the City of Manteca Community Development Department about the inclusion of appropriate pedestrian facilities. If pedestrian facilities are deemed to be necessary, such facilities shall be provided on the final site plan.

Approval of plan Prior to site plan
review for each Master Plan light industrial use
City of Manteca Community Development Department
Exhibit "B"
City of Manteca – Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Michael Brandman Associates 20 H:\Client (PN-JN)\2482\24820003\5 - FEIR\MMRP\24820003 Northwest Airport Way MMRP.doc Table 1 (cont.): Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Verification of Completion Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Date Initial MM TRANS-6d: Prior to site plan review for the Master Plan community commercial use, the applicant shall prepare and submit plans to the City of Manteca demonstrating access and facilities for public transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Public transit facilities shall consist of at least one bus turnout with shelter, lighting, trash receptacle, and direct pedestrian connection to the community commercial center. Bicycle facilities shall consist of racks near building entrances that provide storage equivalent to 2 percent of the minimum Municipal Code parking requirement. Pedestrian facilities shall consist of sidewalks along street frontages and direct connections between buildings. The approved facilities shall be incorporated in the community commercial center plans.

Approval of plan Prior to site plan
review for the Master Plan community commercial use
City of Manteca Community Development Department & Public Works MM TRANS-7: Prior to issuance of grading permits for each Master Plan use, the applicant shall submit a Construction Traffic Control Plan to the City of Manteca for review and approval. The plan shall identify the timing and routing of all major construction equipment and trucking to avoid potential traffic congestion and delays on the local street network. The plan shall encourage the use of Interstate 5 (I-5), Roth Road, Airport Way, and Lathrop Road wherever practical. Anticipated temporary road closures should be identified, along with safety measures and detours. If necessary, construction equipment and materials deliveries shall be limited to off-peak hours to avoid conflicts with local traffic circulation. The plan shall also identify suitable locations for construction worker parking.

Approval of plan Prior to issuance of
grading permits for each Master Plan use
City of Manteca Public Works
Exhibit "B"

INITIAL STUDY AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH PROJECT
PAGE 146
APPENDIX E: PLAN SET
Exhibit "B"

SITE DATA TABLE
BUILDING LAND AREA AC NET LAND AREA SF FAR % BLDG FOOT PRINT SF BLDG MEZZ. TOTAL BLDG SF OFFICE SF WAREHOUSE SF OFFICE PRKG. WAREHOUSE PRKG. PRKG REQ. PRKG PROV. 1 21.3 AC+/- 927,700+/- 39% 355,000 5,000 360,000 10,000 40 215 242 (1/250) (0.5/1000)
350,000 175
(.67/1000)
LANDSCAPE %

16.8%

APPLICANT/OWNER

GREENLAW PARTNERS
18301 VON KARMAN AVE STE. 250
IRVINE, CA 92612
CONTACT: ROB MITCHELL
(CELL) 714-749-6508

ARCHITECT

AO ARCHITECTS
144 NORTH STREET
ORANGE, CA 92866
CONTACT: STEPHEN PRZYBYLOWSKI
717- 417-1122
[email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER

NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING
620 12TH ST.

MODESTO, CA 95354
CONTACT: COREY WALKER
(TEL) 209-524-3525 EXT. 132
SHEET DESCRIPTION:

A1 SITE PLAN & PROJECT DATA
A2 TRUCK INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM SITE
A4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
A7

COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD
C1.1 COVER SHEET
L1 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
A3 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN
A5 CONCEPTUAL COLOR ELEVATIONS
TEAM PLAYERS:

A8

WALL & FENCE PLAN
= 12' X 55' TRAILER PARKING
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION:

BUILDING: BS1, F1
GRAPHIC LEGEND:
= OFFICE ENTRY
= GRADE DOOR (14'X14')
= A.D.A. ACCESSIBLE PRKG.
= PROPERTY LINE (SEE CIVIL)
= DOCK DOOR & LEVELER
= CANOPY OR OVERHANG
= CENTERLINE OR GRID LINE
= EASEMENT (SEE CIVIL)
= TRASH ENCLOSURE W/ SOLID ROOF
A.D.A ACCESIBLE
= WB-67' TRACTOR TRAILER
= ADA PATH OF TRAVEL
1 KEY NOTES:

PEDESTRIAN PAVING (SEE CIVIL & LANDSCAPE)
2 CONCRETE VEHICULAR PAVING (SEE CIVIL)
3 LANDSCAPE AREA (SEE LANDSCAPE)
4 ACCESS DOOR OR EMERGENCY ACCESS DOOR
AUTOMATIC ROLLING GATE (8'-HEIGHT)
5 TRASH ENCLOSURE (ADA COMPLIANT)
6 7
STEEL TUBULAR FENCE (8' HEIGHT)
#
8 PROVIDE KNOX BOX (LOCATION PER FIRE DEPT.)
9 ADA RAMP (AS REQUIRED)
= LIGHT STANDARD LUMINAIR N.T.S.
= WALL PACK WITH CUT-OFF N.T.S. SHALL
NOT EXCEED 18' ABOVE GRADE
MUST BE FULLY SHIELDED SEC. 19.7.8.E.2.a.4
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: lllB

PARKING REQUIREMENTS
PARKING STALL SIZES:

STANDARD PARKING STALL - 9' X 18'
A.D.A. (HANDICAP) STALLS - 9' X 18'
12' X 18' (VAN)
WAREHOUSE: 0.5/1000

A DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE FACILITY CONSISTING OF A WAREHOUSE TOTALING 360,000 SF OR 8.26 NET ACRES
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT

MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: = LI
ZONING / LAND USE:

PROJECT DATA:

GROSS SITE AREA: 927,700 S.F. 21.3 AC.

BUILDING AREA
OFFICE 10,000 S.F.

WAREHOUSE 350,00 S.F.

TOTAL BUILDING AREA 360,000 S.F.

LOT COVERAGE; PROPOSED: 38.2%

PARKING REQUIREMENTS
WAREHOUSE (1/1000 SF) 175 STALLS
OFFICE (1/250 SF) 40 STALLS
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 215 STALLS

PARKING PROVIDED

TRAILER PARKING PROVIDED
TRAILER (12' x 55') 93 STALLS

SETBACKS/YARDS

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

LANDSCAPE
SPLA
2883 VIA RANCHEROS WAY
FALLBROOK, CA 92028
CONTACT: LORENZO RODARTE, PLA
(TEL) 760-842-8993 (909) 771-8171
PROJECT ADDRESS:
3045 SOUTH AIRPORT WAY
MANTECA, CA 95336
A6
A9

SITE PHOTOS BOARD
10 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL

CONCEPTUAL RENDERED VIEW
C1.2 STREET CROSS SECTIONS
C2.1 TOPOGRAPHIC AND DEMOLITION PLAN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:

A.P.N.: 198-200-013
C3.1 DIMENSION AND PAVING PLAN
C4.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C5.1 COMPOSITE UTILITY AND

STORMWATER QUALITY PLAN
E1 PHOTOMETRIC STUDY

OWNER REPRESENTATIVE

A MICHAEL SOUZA, ALC,CRE
672 W. 11TH ST. STE. 110
TRACY, CA 95376
(TEL) 209-835-8330

CEO,SOUZA REALTY & DEVELOPMENT
GROUP, INC.

PHOTOMETRIC
HCS ENGINEERING, INC.
4512 FEATHER RIVER DR, #F
STOCKTON, CA 95219
CONTACT: RICHARD C. SMITH, PE
(TEL) 209-478-8270

MANTECA PLANNING
CONTACT: MALLORIE FENRICH, PLANNER
(TEL) 209-456-8500
[email protected]
EXISTING : - VACANT
PROPOSED: - INDUSTRIAL
SPECIFIC PLAN : - CENTER POINT SPECIFIC PLAN
The Land referred to herein below is situated in the City of Manteca, County of San Joaquin, State of California, and is described as follows: PARCEL A: RESULTANT PARCEL 4 AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN NOTICE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 22, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-181147, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. ALL OF THE LAND DEEDED TO RICHARD AND MIKKI RIELLA DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 24, 2006 IN DOCUMENT NO. 2006-113055, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS. TOGETHER WITH THE PARCEL OF LAND MORE PARTICULAR1Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF THE LAND DEEDED TO RICHARD AND MIKKI RIELLA DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 24, 2006 IN DOCUMENT NO. 2006-113058, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, ALSO BEING A PORTION OF LOT 4 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP FILED FOR RECORD JUNE 17, 1993 IN BOOK 31 OF MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 78, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST COMER OF THE LAND DEEDED TO RICHARD AND MIKKI RIELLA DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 24, 2006 IN DOCUMENT NO. 2006-113055, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 3 AS SHOWN ON LAST SAID MAP; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, SOUTH 87°27'22" EAST, 973.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, NORTH 00°14'23" EAST, 564.08 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE "DESIGNATED REMAINDER" AS SHOWN ON LAST SAID MAP; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, SOUTH 87°26'11" EAST, 834.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AIRPORT WAY, SAID POINT BEING 55.00 FEET WEST (MEASURED AT RIGHT OF THE CENTER1INE OF SAID AIRPORT WAY, SAID CENTERLINE ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 00°17'38" WEST, 152.83 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN-ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP FILED FOR RECORD OCTOBER 11, 1996 IN BOOK 20 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 135, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, NORTH 87°27'22" WEST, 265.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13, SOUTH 00°17'38" WEST, 410.94 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, NORTH 87°27'22"' WEST, 568.77 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE PARCEL OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF THE LAND DEEDED TO RICHARD AND MIKKI RIELLA DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED MAY 24, 2006 IN DOCUMENT NO. 2006-113055, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LAND DEEDED TO RICHARD AND MIKKI RIELLA, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP FILED FOR RECORD JUNE 17, 1993 IN BOOK 31 OF MAPS AND PLATS, PAGE 78, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4,
SOUTH 87°27'22" EAST, 973.01 FEET; THENCE LEAVING LAST SAID LINE, SOUTH 00°14'23" WEST, 563.01 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 2 AS SHOWN ON LAST SAID MAP, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LAND DEEDED TO RICHARD AND MIKKI RIELLA, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, NORTH 87°28'22" WEST, 963.52 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LAND DEEDED TO RICHARD AND MIKKI RIELLA, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3 AS SHOWN ON LAST SAID MAP; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3, NORTH 00°43'22'' WEST, 563.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP FILED FOR RECORD OCTOBER 11, 1996 IN BOOK 20 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 135, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS. 11 BIKE RACK (PROVIDE 8 BIKE PARKING SPACES)
VAN ACCESSIBLE 3 STALLS
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE 6 STALLS
EVCS VAN ACCESSIBLE 1 STALLS
EVCS STANDARD ACCESSIBLE 1 STALLS
EVCS STANDARD 23 STALLS
CLEAN AIR / VANPOOL 30 STALLS
STANDARD 178 STALLS
TOTAL 242 STALLS
OFFICE: 1/250 185'
(SECURED SERVICE YARD)
28'
28' 28' 28'
South Airport Way
Tactical Way
Proposed Private Drive 40'

VAN VAN
W67 W67 25' 25' 10' W67 W67 W67
VAN
52 TRAILER PARKING 12'
49' 9' 45' 9' 9' 63' 9' 54' 32' 54' 9' 72' 9' 72' 9' 54' 9' 93' 36' 9' 49' 45'
72' 9' 72'
18' 28' 20' 20' 28' 20' 20' 28' 54' 9' 9' 54' 18' 54' 9' 18'
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 10 10
10 10
7 7
4 4
1 1
1 4
6 6
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 R60'
Truck Turnaround Area
3 3
3 957' 360'
4 4
4 4
4 4
1 46 HIGH DOCK POSITIONS
OFFICE
& MEZZ. OFFICE
& MEZZ.

OFFICE
& MEZZ.

G.D. G.D.
360,000 GSF
355,000 GF + 5,000 MEZZ
(LI) ZONE
(LI) ZONE
3 3
36'-1"

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY 45' 9'
9'
9' 45' 63' 9' 63' 9' 45' 9' 45' 9' 63' 9' 63' 9' 45' 9' 36' 18' 9' 36' 45' 9' 36' 9'
11 CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

VANPOOL
CLEAN AIR CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL STOP 9' 54' 9' 63' 9' 54' 9' 54' 9' 66' 88'-8" 66'
89'
72' 97' 32'
15' SSJID ESMT

SEE CIVIL
15' SSJID ESMT
SEE CIVIL 28' 28' 30' 15'
36' 9'
10 76'-7"
32'
E.V.A. ONLY 5' 45' 45' 9' 10' 5'
25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS
EASEMENT; SEE CIVIL
25' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACCESS; SEE CIVIL

BIO RETENTION
(43,560 SF)
50' 120'

MONUMENT SIGN
STOP
N
0 5' 20' 50' 75' 10' 100'
50'
AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH DISCLAIMER: ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING OWNER AND OR AGENCY REVIEW AND IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY

MANTECA, CA
2022-11-02
2022-201
© 2021 Architects Orange, LLP dba AO These plans are copyright protected. Under such protection unauthorized use is not permitted. These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by AO. drawing file name: p:\2022-201 greenlaw - airport centre north - ph ii\03 design\entitlement\2022-201-00 greenlaw manteca north entitlement.dwg CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN & PROJECT DATA A1
Exhibit "B"
South Airport Way
(EXISTING DRIVE)
W67
Proposed Street "A" ( N. A. P.)
Roth Road
Subject Site:

Intermodal Way
(LI) ZONE
(LI) ZONE
(LI) ZONE
(LI) ZONE (AG) ZONE
Tactical Way
Legend:

Truck ingress/egress = © 2021 Architects Orange, LLP dba AO These plans are copyright protected. Under such protection unauthorized use is not permitted. These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by AO. drawing file name: p:\2022-201 greenlaw - airport centre north - ph ii\03 design\entitlement\2022-201-00 greenlaw manteca north entitlement.dwg AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH TRUCK INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM SITE A2 DISCLAIMER: ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING OWNER AND OR AGENCY REVIEW AND IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY

MANTECA, CA
2022-04-06
2022-201
Exhibit "B"
420'1
46 HIGH DOCK POSITIONS
OFFICE
& MEZZ. OFFICE
& MEZZ.

OFFICE
& MEZZ.
112' 728'-4" 116'-8"
G.D. G.D.
360,000 GSF
355,000 GF + 5,000 MEZZ N
0 5' 20' 30' 45' 10' 60'
30' © 2021 Architects Orange, LLP dba AO These plans are copyright protected. Under such protection unauthorized use is not permitted. These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by AO. drawing file name: p:\2022-201 greenlaw - airport centre north - ph ii\03 design\entitlement\2022-201-00 greenlaw manteca north entitlement.dwg AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN A3 DISCLAIMER: ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING OWNER AND OR AGENCY REVIEW AND IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY

MANTECA, CA
2022-04-06
2022-201
Exhibit "B"
51' 48' 13'-6"
EAST ELEVATION 2 6 4 3 1 4 2 5 2 40' 48' 13'-6" 51'
NORTH ELEVATION 2 4 1 5 3 6 48' 13'-6" 51'
WEST ELEVATION 2 6 3 1 5 4 40' 48' 13'-6" 51'
SOUTH ELEVATION 4 5 1 3 2 6 51' 48' 13'-6" 2 6 4 48' 13'-6" 51' 2 6 1

PAINTED ACCENT INSET

MEDIUM PERFORMANCE GLASS IN
CLEAR ANOD. ALUM. MULLION SYSTEM. 2
CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL 36

CLERESTORY MEDIUM PERFORMANCE GLASS IN
CLEAR ANOD. ALUM. MULLIO SYSTEM 4
KEY NOTES: 5

METAL CANOPY

CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL
WITH REVEALS © 2021 Architects Orange, LLP dba AO These plans are copyright protected. Under such protection unauthorized use is not permitted. These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by AO. drawing file name: p:\2022-201 greenlaw - airport centre north - ph ii\03 design\entitlement\2022-201-00 greenlaw manteca north entitlement.dwg AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS A4 DISCLAIMER: ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING OWNER AND OR AGENCY REVIEW AND IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY

MANTECA, CA
2022-04-06
2022-201

ENLARGED EAST SIDE ENTRY ENLARGED WEST SIDE CORNER
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "B"
(SECURED SERVICE YARD)
South Airport Way
Tactical Way
Proposed Private Drive

VAN VAN
VAN
52 TRAILER PARKING
Truck Turnaround Area 1
46 HIGH DOCK POSITIONS
OFFICE
& MEZZ. OFFICE
& MEZZ.

OFFICE
& MEZZ.

G.D. G.D.
360,000 GSF
355,000 GF + 5,000 MEZZ
(LI) ZONE
(LI) ZONE

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING

ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING

ONLY CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL STOP

BIO RETENTION
(43,560 SF)

MONUMENT SIGN
STOP
GATE SCREENING:

TYPICAL SCREEN WALL 0 5 10 3012' TO 14'

ELEVATION
PLAN VIEW © 2021 Architects Orange, LLP dba AO These plans are copyright protected. Under such protection unauthorized use is not permitted. These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by AO. drawing file name: p:\2022-201 greenlaw - airport centre north - ph ii\03 design\entitlement\2022-201-00 greenlaw manteca north entitlement.dwg AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH WALL & FENCE PLAN A7 DISCLAIMER: ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING OWNER AND OR AGENCY REVIEW AND IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY

MANTECA, CA
2022-11-02
2022-201 N
0 5' 20' 50' 75' 10' 100'
50'
9' HEIGHT TUBE STEEL
LEGEND:

FENCE (PAINTED BLACK)
12' TO 14' CONCRETE

SCREEN WALL
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "B"

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING

ONLY CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY

PROPOSED BUILDING STOP
VAN
VAN

VAN STOP

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

AIRPORT WAY

TACTICAL WAY
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
15' SSJID EASEMENT
PER I.N. 2017-038801
25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT DEED PER I.N. 94136296 25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT DEED PER I.N. 93153195 25' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACCESS PER 31-M-78
15' SSJID ESMT PER 2038-OR-71
15' SSJID ESMT PER 2031-OR-563

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
APN: 198-200-017
APN: 198-200-014
APN: 198-200-021

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

ABBREVIATIONS

PLUS OR MINUS (NOT EXACT)
AT

AGGREGATE BASE

ASPHALT CONCRETE

ACCESSIBLE

AVERAGE DAILY TRUCK TRAFFIC

ATRIUM GRATE

ALTERNATE

ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER

AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER RISER
AVENUE

BEGIN CURVE

BOUNDARY

BACK FLOW PREVENTOR
BOOK

BENCH MARK

BACK OF WALK

BUILDING SETBACK LINE

BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE

CURB AND GUTTER

CATCH BASIN

CONTINUOUS DEFLECTION

SEPARATORS

CAST IRON PIPE

CENTER LINE

CORRUGATED METAL PIPE

CLEAN OUT

CITY OF MANTECA

COMPACTION

CONCRETE

CURB RETURN
COURT

CHECK VALVE

DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VALVE

DRAIN INLET

DIAMETER

DUCTILE IRON PIPE

DOMESTIC
DRIVE
±
@
AB
AC
ACC
ADTT
AG
ALT
APN
ASR
AVE
BC
BDRY
BFP
BK
BM
BW
BSL
BVC
C&G OR C.G.

CB
CDS
CIP
℄ OR CL
CMP
CO
C.O.M.

COMP.

CONC OR CC
CR
CT.

CV
DDCV
DI
DIA
DIP
(DOM)
DR

MINIMUM
NORTH
NDS INC. (MANUFACTURER)

NOT INCLUDED

NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING

NOT TO SCALE

ON CENTER
OFFSET

ORIGINAL GROUND / GRADE

OVER HEAD ELECTRIC

PAVEMENT

POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE OR

PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE
PAGE

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

PRESSURE INDICATOR VALVE

PROPERTY LINE

PARCEL MAP

POINT OF CONNECTION

POWER POLE

POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE

PROFILE
POINT

PRESSURE TREATED DOUGLAS FIR

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE

RECLAIMED WATER

RIGHT-OF-WAY
RADIUS

RELATIVE COMPACTION

REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

RELATIVE DENSITY
ROAD
RETURN

REDUCED PRESSURE DETECTOR

ASSEMBLY

RESISTANCE VALUE

REDUCED PRESSURE

BACKFLOW PREVENTER
MIN
N
NDS
NIC
NSE
NTS
OC
OF
OG
OHE

P OR PAV
PCC
PG
PG&E
PIV
PL
PM
POC
PP
PRC
PROF
PT
PTDF
PUE
PVC
RW
R/W
R
RC
RCP
R.D.

RD
RET
RPDA
RV
RP
BP
DW
E
EC
EM
ELC
ELEV
EP
ER

ESMT OR EASE

EX OR EXIST
FDC
FES
FF
FG
FH
FL
FM
FS
FSR
GB
GR
GS
GS@W
GV
HORIZ
HP
HPS
HT
HWY
ID
INV
IRR
LF
LN
LP
LT
JT
MAX
MH

DRIVEWAY
EAST

END OF CURVE

ELECTRIC METER

ELECTROLIER

ELEVATION

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

END OF RETURN

EASEMENT

EXISTING

FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

FLARED END SECTION

FINISH FLOOR

FINISH GRADE

FIRE HYDRANT

FLOW LINE

FORCE MAIN

FIRE SERVICE

FIRE SPRINKLER RISER

GRADE BREAK

GRATE, GRADE, OR GROUND

GROUND SHOT ELEVATION

GROUND SHOT AT WALL

GATE VALVE

HORIZONTAL

HIGH POINT

HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM
HEIGHT

HIGHWAY

INSIDE DIAMETER
INVERT

IRRIGATION

LINEAL FEET OR LINEAR FEET
LANE

LOW POINT
LEFT

JOINT TRENCH

MAXIMUM

MAINTENANCE HOLE
S
SC
SCDA
SD
SDOF
SG
SHT
SIM
SNS
ST
STL
STA
STD

S/W OR SW
SS
TC
TD
TDC
TEMP
TG
THRU
TI
TID
TW
TPE
TVC
TYP
UON
VERT
VCP
W
WM
WS
WY
W/
WWF

SLOPE OR SOUTH

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

SINGLE CHECK DETECTOR

ASSEMBLY

STORM DRAIN

STORM DRAIN OUTFALL

SUB-GRADE
SHEET

SIMILAR

STREET NAME SIGN
STREET
STEEL

STATION

STANDARD

SIDEWALK

SANITARY SEWER

TOP OF CURB

TRENCH DRAIN

TOP OF DRIVE OVER CURB

TEMPORARY

TOP OF GRATE

THROUGH

TRAFFIC INDEX

TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT

TOP OF WALL

TREE PLANTING EASEMENT

TOP OF VERTICAL CURB

TYPICAL

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED

VERTICAL

VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE

WATER OR WEST

WATER METER

WATER SERVICE
WAY
WITH

WELDED WIRE FABRIC

PROJECT LOCATION

SITE ADDRESS
3045 AIRPORT WAY
MANTECA, CA 95336

PREPARED FOR
CLIENT:

GREENLAW DEVELOPMENT, LLC
18301 VON KARMAN AVENUE, SUITE 250
IRVINE, CA 92612
P: (714) 749-5608
CONTACT:

ROBERT G. MITCHELL

EXISTING PROPOSED
LEGEND
32 32
106.82

BOUNDARY LINE

CENTERLINE

RIGHT-OF-WAY

PARCEL LINE

MONUMENT
SAWCUT

CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER

TRENCH DRAIN

STORM DRAIN (MAIN)

FORCE MAIN

DRAINAGE SWALE

STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE HOLE

CURB INLET

DRAIN INLET

DRAIN INLET ON MAINTENANCE HOLE

STORM DRAINAGE FILTER

WATER (MAIN)

WATER (SERVICE)

WATER VALVE

WATER BLOW OFF VALVE

BACK FLOW PREVENTER

POST INDICATOR VALVE (SINGLE)

FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

FIRE HYDRANT

FIRE SPRINKLER RISER

WATER METER

REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE

DETECTOR ASSEMBLY

SINGLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY

SERVICE STUB

CLEANOUT

SEWER MAINTENANCE HOLE

GREASE TRAP

SEWER (MAIN)

JOINT TRENCH (APPROX LOCATION)

TRANSFORMER (APPROX LOCATION)

OVER HEAD ELECTRICAL

SERVICE POLE

JOINT POLE

JOINT POLE WITH LIGHT

POWER POLE

TELEPHONE POLE
GUY

ELECTRICAL MANHOLE

ELECTROLIER

UTILITY BOX

GAS LINE

GAS VALVE

PAD ELEVATION

FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION (PROPOSED)

BUILDING PAD

TOP OF CURB ELEVATION

ORIGINAL GROUND

DIRECTION OF FLOW

CONTOURS

WALL (SEE LABEL FOR TYPE)

FENCE (CHAINLINK OR VINYL)

FENCE (WIRE OR HOGWIRE)

FENCE (WOOD OR WROUGHT IRON)

FENCE (SPLIT RAIL)

TREE OR SHRUB

TREE STUMP

IRRIGATION LINE

IRRIGATION VALVE

IRRIGATION PRESSURE MANHOLE/VENT
SIGN

PERCOLATION TEST LOCATION

R-VALUE SAMPLE LOCATION

KEYNOTE SYMBOL
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
RV-X
P-X
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FDC
PIV
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FF=0000.00
FDC
PIV
100W 150W 200W
N/A
FSR
8"W
8"W
WV WV
BO BO

BFP BFP
WM WM
JP
SP
PP
TPJP
GV
ICV
N/A
N/A
RPPA
SCDA

10.0 3.0%

68.34 TC 68.34 TC

3.0%
X X
12"SD
48"FD
Ex12"SD
Ex48"FM
Ex8"W
Ex8"W
Ex12"SS 12"SS
Ex48"IRR

N/A COVER SHEET

AS SHOWN

SHEET INDEX

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. C1.1 COVER SHEET

2. C1.2 STREET CROSS SECTIONS

SITE PLANS

3. C2.1 TOPOGRAPHIC AND DEMOLITION PLAN

4. C3.1 DIMENSION AND PAVING PLAN

5. C4.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN

6. C5.1 COMPOSITE UTILITY AND STORMWATER QUALITY PLAN

CONCEPTUAL PLANNING PLANS FOR

AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH

MANTECA, CALIFORNIA
0 1" =
100 50 100
100' APPROVED
SHEET
NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTIONS REVISIONS NO. CALIFORNIA
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D:

PLOTTED: 10/14/2022 14:24 PLOTTED BY: Corey
DWGNAME: F:\21-2967 Airport Business Centre North\Planning\Planning Plans\C1.1 CVR.dwg C1.1
COPYRIGHT © 2022 NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC
21-2967
CMW
CMW
JC
10/14/2022

MANTECA, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH CONCEPTUAL PLANNING PLANS FOR PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT

LOCATION

W LATHROP RD

LOVELACE RD

S AIRPORT WAY

INTERMODAL WAY

ROTH ROAD
WEST SIDE FWY (HWY 5)

VICINITY MAP
NTS
Exhibit "B"

STREET CROSS SECTIONS

AS SHOWN APPROVED
SHEET
NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTIONS REVISIONS NO. CALIFORNIA
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D: PLOTTED: 10/14/2022 14:24 PLOTTED BY: Corey DWGNAME: F:\21-2967 Airport Business Centre North\Planning\Planning Plans\C1.2 DTL.dwg C1.2
COPYRIGHT © 2022 NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC
21-2967
CMW
CMW
JC
10/14/2022
MANTECA, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH CONCEPTUAL PLANNING PLANS FOR PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

SECTION LANE/CL

EXISTING

EAST R/W

EXISTING

WEST R/W
WEST

ULTIMATE
R/W
2%
± 17'

VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER

EXISTING PAVEMENT
12' LANE ± 5' SHLDR
VARIES
5'

MEANDERING
WALK
TC
5' BIKE LANE 11' LANE

EXISTING
EP
65' 40'
11' LANE 18' LANDSCAPED MEDIAN
SLOPE
45'
VARIES
55'

PROPOSED
20' 10' DEDICATION
20'
40' LANDSCAPED BUFFER

PROPOSED MEDIAN CURB

AIRPORT WAY CROSS SECTION A

AC PAVEMENT
±23.0' ±22.7'

EXISTING

PROPERTY
LINE
±13.8' ±12.0'
±36.8' ±34.7'

TACTICAL WAY CROSS SECTION B

71.5'
EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING 15' WIDE SSJID

IRRIGATION EASEMENT
EXISTING 25' WIDE UPRR EASEMENT
EXISTING 25' WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT EXISTING VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER

EXISTING VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER

SLOPE SLOPE

EXISTING

PROPERTY
LINE

TYPICAL BIORETENTION SECTION

PROPOSED

0.25' FREEBOARD PAVEMENT

PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB PROPOSED BUBBLE-UP RISER (TYP)

PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER

PROPOSED PAVEMENT
12' 128'

PROPOSED OVERFLOW RISER (TYP)

FENCE C

PROPOSED BIORETENTION
AREA
3:1 MAX
3:1 MAX

PROPOSED WEEP HOLE (TYP)
Exhibit "B"

21.6 21.6

22.0 22.0

22.0 22.0

12.4 12.6

14.6 14.4

16.4 16.6

18.4 18.6

20.6 22.4 22.6

13.013.2

15.0 15.2

17.2 17.0

13.0 15.2 15.0 14.8

17.0 19.8 20.0 20.2

22.6 22.4

13.0 13.2

15.0 14.8 15.2

17.8 17.6 17.4

19.8 20.0

22.0 21.8

23.6 23.4

13.2 13.0

15.2 15.0 14.8

20.0 22.2 22.0

23.6 23.4 23.8

17.4 17.6

21.6 22.0

21.8 22.2 22.4 22.6

22.4 22.6

23.0 22.6

22.6 22.8

23.2 22.2

22.4 22.6

24.0 23.6

23.8 23.6

23.6 23.4

23.6 23.6

23.6 24.0

23.6 23.6

23.6 23.8

24.2 24.4

24.0 24.0

23.6 23.8

23.8 23.8

24.0 23.8

24.2 23.6

23.8 23.6

24.0 25.0

23.4 23.4

23.6 23.8

24.2 24.4

24.6 24.8

25.2 23.423.6

23.4 23.6 23.8

24.0 24.0

23.6 23.8

24.2 24.2

24.4 24.6

24.8 23.4

24.0 23.4

23.4 23.6 23.8

24.2 24.4 23.4

23.4 23.6

23.8 23.6

25.0 24.2

24.4 24.6

24.8 25.2

24.6 24.8

25.4 25.6

25.4 25.0

23.2 23.0 23.2

23.4 24.2

24.4 23.4

23.6 23.8

24.0 24.2

24.4 24.0

23.8 24.2

24.4 22.0 22.8 21.6 22.2

24.0 21.8

22.6 23.622.0 22.8 23.4 21.6 22.2 22.8 21.6 22.4 22.8 21.8 22.4 23.2 22.0 22.8 23.4

25.6 25.8

25.6 25.4 25.6

WV TP WV
TP
PP
Ex12"W

EXISTING CONCRETE

EXISTING DIRT ROAD

EXISTING DIRT ROAD
EXISTING 5' FENCE (METAL)
EXISTING 5' FENCE (METAL)
EXISTING 6" IRRIGATION HEADWALL
EX-SDCB(5917)
±12.44RIM
±7.44FL(30")E

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING

EXISTING GAS MARKER POST
ICB
ICB
ICB
ICB
ICV
MAIL

EXISTING MAILBOX
MAIL
MAIL
MAIL
MAIL

EXISTING BUILDING
15"TREE
10"TREE
(2) 10"TREE
10"TREE
10"TREE
(3) 10"TREE
EX-SDMH(12102) ±23.07RIM
±16.40FL(12")W
±7.32FL(54")S,E
EX-SDCB(12133) ±21.83RIM
±19.73FL(12")NE
EX-SDMH(12134) ±22.68RIM
±19.38FL(12")SW
±17.08FL(12")N
±7.57FL(48")W/E
EX-SDMH(12231) ±23.24RIM
±7.93FL(54")W/E
EX-SDMH(12352) ±24.23RIM
±17.68FL(12")NE ±9.91FL(30")N
±8.37FL(48")E
±8.37FL(54")W
EX-SDMH(12341) ±24.09RIM
±11.54FL(15")W
±11.49FL(18")NW
±11.14FL(24")E
±10.04FL(30")S
EX-SDMH(13709) ±25.14RIM
±8.92FL(48")N
±8.80FL(48")W
EX-SSMH(13674)
±25.63RIM
±13.99FL(10")W
±10.63FL(18")S/N
EX-SSMH(12230)
±23.29RIM
±15.54FL(10")S, STUB ±15.48FL(10")E
EX-SSMH(12353)
±24.34RIM
±14.96FL(10")W/E
STOP
WV
WV
WV
WV

WV WV WV
WV
WV
ELB

JP JP JP
JP
SP
PP

TP TP JP
ELB
ELB
ELB

EXISTING GATE

EXISTING GATE
ICV
ICV

ICV ICV
ISP EXISTING 24" IRRIGATION VALVE
ICV
EXISTING 24" IRRIGATION VALVE
EXISTING 24" IRRIGATION VALVE EX. 24" IRRIGATION VALVE
EXISTING 24" IRRIGATION VALVE
EXISTING 24" IRRIGATION VALVE
EXISTING 5" IRRIGATION HEADWALL
EXISTING 5" IRRIGATION HEADWALL
EX. 5" IRRIGATION HEADWALL
EXISTING 5" IRRIGATION HEADWALL
EXISTING 6" IRRIGATION HEADWALL
EXISTING 6" IRRIGATION HEADWALL
EX-IRRMH(12364) ±24.41RIM
BOLTED
EX-ISP(12365)
±32.28RIM
±17.78FL(10")
@BOTTOM
ICP
EXISTING 5' FENCE (HOGWIRE)
EXISTING 5' FENCE (HOGWIRE)
EXISTING 5' FENCE (HOGWIRE)

EXISTING GATE EXISTING GATE
EXISTING 5' FENCE (HOGWIRE)
EXISTING 5' FENCE (HOGWIRE)

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD

EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD

EXISTING GATE
EX. STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN

STRUCTURE
Ex54"SD
Ex54"SD
Ex54"SD
Ex48"SD
Ex10"SS
Ex12"W
Ex12"W
Ex12"W Ex12"W Ex12"W Ex12"W

EXISTING CONCRETE

EXISTING CONCRETE

EXISTING STANDING

DUCTILE IRON PIPE

EXISTING STANDING

DUCTILE IRON PIPE

EXISTING STANDING

DUCTILE IRON PIPE

EXISTING STANDING

DUCTILE IRON PIPE
EX-ISP(12171)
±31.04RIM
±18.04FL(42")E
±FL(42")W, GATE ±FL(42")S, GATE ±17.10@BOTTOM BOX
ICB
JP
EXISTING 8" WALL (CONCRETE)

EXISTING CONCRETE
Ex30"SD
Ex42"IRR
Ex42"IRR
Ex42"IRR
Ex42"IRR
Ex42"IRR
EX-ISP(12173)
±31.44RIM
±18.84FL(12")
@BOTTOM
ICB
ICP
Ex42"IRR
Ex42"IRR
GV
Ex6"SSFM Ex6"SSFM Ex6"SSFM

EXISTING DOWNSPOUT

EXISTING DOWNSPOUT
EX. LIGHT AND CAMERA
EX. STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING SIGN "NO PARKING"
EXISTING SIGN "NO PARKING"
EXISTING SIGN "NO PARKING"
EXISTING SIGN "NO PARKING"
EXISTING SIGN "ARROW"
EX. SIGN "MERGE LEFT"
EXISTING SIGN "STOP"
ELC
(4)EXISTING BOLLARD (4"x4')

EXISTING MAILBOX

EXISTING MAILBOX
(4)EXISTING BOLLARD (4"x3')
(3) EXISTING MAILBOX RELOCATE EXISTING
FIRE HYDRANT RELOCATE EX. FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
RELOCATE EX. FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING 4' FENCE
(BARBED-WIRE)

EXISTING GATE
EXISTING 5' FENCE
(CHAINLINK)
EXISTING 5' FENCE
(BARBED-WIRE)

EXISTING GATE
EXISTING 5' FENCE
(BARBED-WIRE) EXISTING 5' FENCE
(BARBED-WIRE)

EXISTING GATE
EXISTING 3' FENCE
(HOGWIRE)
EXISTING 5' FENCE
(BARBED-WIRE)

EXISTING GATE

EXISTING GATE
EXISTING 5' FENCE (HOGWIRE)
EXISTING 5' FENCE (HOGWIRE)
EX. 5' FENCE (HOGWIRE)

EXISTING GATE

EXISTING GATE

EXISTING GATE

EXISTING POWER POLE

UNDERGROUND EXISTING

TELEPHONE POLE

EXISTING TELEPHONE POLE

EXISTING STREET LIGHT AND
BOX
EX. STREET LIGHT AND BOX

EXISTING STREET LIGHT AND
BOX
EX. STREET LIGHT AND BOX
EX. STREET LIGHT AND BOX

EXISTING

JUNCTION POLE

EXISTING JUNCTION POLE
AND 6" CONDUIT
EX. JUNCTION POLE

EXISTING JUNCTION POLE

EXISTING JUNCTION POLE

EXISTING POWER POLE

EXISTING JUNCTION POLE

EXISTING TELEPHONE POLE

EXISTING TELEPHONE POLE
EX-MH(13562)
±25.77RIM

AIRPORT WAY

TACTICAL WAY
EX. PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PAVEMENT

EXISTING PAVEMENT
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
15' SSJID EASEMENT
PER I.N. 2017-038801
25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT DEED PER I.N. 94136296 25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT
DEED PER I.N. 93153195
25' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACCESS PER 31-M-78
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2038-OR-71
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2031-OR-563

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

23.6 24.0

24.0 24.2

23.4 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING

EXISTING BUILDING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING BUILDING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION

EXISTING BUILDING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CONCRETE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CONCRETE MAIL
(4)EXISTING BOLLARD (4"x3')

EXISTING GATE

EXISTING SERVICE POLE

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING TREES

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FENCE

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CONCRETE STRUCTURE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING

CONCRETE STRUCTURE
APN: 198-200-006
APN: 198-200-009
APN: 198-200-013
APN: 198-200-017
APN: 198-200-014
APN: 198-200-021

EXISTING WASTEWATER POND
RELOCATE EX. FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

EXISTING GAS LEASE AREA

TO BE TERMINATED

EXISTING GAS LEASE AREA

TO BE TERMINATED

EXISTING GAS LEASE AREA

TO BE TERMINATED

EXISTING GAS LEASE AREA

TO BE TERMINATED

EXISTING CONCRETE

EXISTING PAVEMENT

EXISTING GRAVEL

EXISTING CONCRETE

STRUCTURAL SECTION TO

BE REMOVED

EXISTING PAVEMENT

STRUCTURAL SECTION TO

BE REMOVED

EXISTING GAS LEASE AREA

TO BE TERMINATED

LEGEND TOPOGRAPHIC AND DEMOLITION PLAN

AS SHOWN
0 1" =
60 30 60
60' APPROVED
SHEET
NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTIONS REVISIONS NO. CALIFORNIA
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D:

PLOTTED: 10/14/2022 14:24 PLOTTED BY: Corey
DWGNAME: F:\21-2967 Airport Business Centre North\Planning\Planning Plans\C2.1 TPO.dwg C2.1
COPYRIGHT © 2022 NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC
21-2967
CMW
CMW
JC
10/14/2022

MANTECA, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH CONCEPTUAL PLANNING PLANS FOR PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION
Exhibit "B"

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING

ONLY CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY PROPOSED BUILDING R80' 70' 63' 9' 54'
R20' R20' R20'
R20'
R50'
18'
28' TYP 25' 435' 9' TYP
14'
R30'
R15' 19' 32'
R3' 28'
R3'
R3'
R15'
R15'
R10'
R3'
R15'
R10'
R15'
R15'
R10' 156'
R3'
R3'
R80'
R3' 38'
R3'
R3'
R30' R30'
AC1.2
14'
R3' 9' TYP 9' TYP
INSTALL 852' TRANSITION

PAVEMENT
B
C1.2
R50'
90'
125' 824' 52' 90' 9' 90'
12'
TYP
13'
TYP 46' TYP 55' 69' 16' TYP 55' 69'
12'
TYP
13'
TYP 66' 9' 54' 9' 60'
18'
TYP 28'
18'
TYP 28'
50'
74'
679' 40'
5' 60'TYP 60'
49' 9' 45' 63' 9' 63' 9' 54'
9'
TYP
9'
TYP
9'
9' TYP
5'
12'
9'
5' 28' TYP 18' 28' TYP 18' 26' 26' 16' 21'
32' 54' 9' 72' 9' 72' 9' 45' 9' 84'
5' 9' 12'
11' 90' 9' 90' 9' 90' 9' 90' TYP 18' 37' 19' TYP 18' 9' TYP 18'
TYP 9' TYP
94' 15' 54' 9' 9' 54' 9' 9' 12'
28'
25' 10'
18'
28' TYP
28'
20'
OFFICE
& MEZZ.
40' 54'
28' 40'
OFFICE
& MEZZ.

OFFICE
& MEZZ. 54'
28' 28' 12'
27' 238' 11'
R60'
R60'
R15'
958'
R3'
17'
9'
R70'
30' 12' 12' 28'
18' STOP W67
W67
R45'
R10'

PROPOSED PLASTIC LANE

DELINEATORS (TYP)
VAN
VAN
VAN
32' 9' 45'
R3'
9' 63' 9'
69'
5'
54' 9'
R3' 54' 9'
53'
R3'
R3' 54' 9'
12' 60'
5' 17' TYP 60'
12'
13'
R3'
R4' R15'
R3' 20'
663' 56'
R5' R5' 4' 229'
R10' R80'
50'
77'
23' 53' 10' 37' 15' 17' 15' 65'
99' 5' 12' 5'
72' 45' 15'
18' 72' 9' 119'
489'
18'

EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS
R35'
CC1.2

EXISTING DIRT ROAD

EXISTING DIRT ROAD
STOP

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

AIRPORT WAY

TACTICAL WAY

EXISTING PAVEMENT

EXISTING PAVEMENT
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
15' SSJID EASEMENT
PER I.N. 2017-038801
25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT DEED PER I.N. 94136296 25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT
DEED PER I.N. 93153195
25' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACCESS PER 31-M-78
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2038-OR-71
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2031-OR-563

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
APN: 198-200-017
APN: 198-200-014
APN: 198-200-021

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

EXISTING DIRT ROAD

EXISTING DIRT ROAD
STOP

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

AIRPORT WAY

TACTICAL WAY

EXISTING PAVEMENT

EXISTING PAVEMENT
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
15' SSJID EASEMENT
PER I.N. 2017-038801
25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT DEED PER I.N. 94136296 25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT
DEED PER I.N. 93153195
25' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACCESS PER 31-M-78
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2038-OR-71
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2031-OR-563

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
APN: 198-200-017
APN: 198-200-014
APN: 198-200-021

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

EXISTING DIRT ROAD

EXISTING DIRT ROAD
STOP

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

AIRPORT WAY

TACTICAL WAY

EXISTING PAVEMENT

EXISTING PAVEMENT
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
15' SSJID EASEMENT
PER I.N. 2017-038801
25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT DEED PER I.N. 94136296 25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT
DEED PER I.N. 93153195
25' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACCESS PER 31-M-78
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2038-OR-71
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2031-OR-563

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
APN: 198-200-017
APN: 198-200-014
APN: 198-200-021

EXISTING PARCEL LINE
LEGEND

EXISTING CONCRETE

PROPOSED CONCRETE

PROPOSED GRASS PAVERS

EXISTING PAVEMENT

PROPOSED PAVEMENT DIMENSION AND PAVING PLAN

AS SHOWN
0 1" =
60 30 60
60' APPROVED
SHEET
NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTIONS REVISIONS NO. CALIFORNIA
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D:

PLOTTED: 10/14/2022 14:24 PLOTTED BY: Corey
DWGNAME: F:\21-2967 Airport Business Centre North\Planning\Planning Plans\C3.1 DIM.dwg C3.1
COPYRIGHT © 2022 NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC
21-2967
CMW
CMW
JC
10/14/2022

MANTECA, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH CONCEPTUAL PLANNING PLANS FOR PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION
Exhibit "B"

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING

ONLY CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY STOP VAN
VAN
VAN

21.6 21.6

22.0 22.0

22.0 22.0

22.0 12.4 12.6

14.6 14.4

16.4 16.6

18.4 18.6

20.6 22.4 22.6

13.013.2

15.0 15.2

17.2 17.0

13.0 15.2 15.0 14.8

17.0 19.8 20.0 20.2

22.6 22.4

13.0 13.2

15.0 14.8 15.2

17.8 17.6 17.4

19.8 20.0

22.0 21.8

23.6 23.4

13.2 13.0

15.2 15.0 14.8

20.0 22.2 22.0

23.6 23.4 23.8

17.4 17.6

21.6 22.0

21.8 22.2 22.4 22.6

22.0 22.4

22.6 23.0

22.6 22.6

22.8 23.2

22.2 22.4

22.6 24.0

23.6 23.8

23.6 23.6

23.4 23.6

23.6 23.6

24.0 23.6

23.6 23.6

23.8 24.2

24.4 24.0

24.0 23.6

23.8 23.8

23.8 24.0

23.8 24.2

23.6 23.8

23.6 24.0

25.0 23.4

23.4 23.6

23.8 24.2

24.4 24.6

24.8 25.2

23.423.6

23.4 23.6 23.8

24.0 24.0

23.6 23.8

24.2 24.2

24.4 24.6

24.8 23.4

24.0 23.4

23.4 23.6 23.8

24.2 24.4 23.4

23.4 23.6

23.8 23.6

25.0 24.2

24.4 24.6

24.8 25.2

24.6 24.8

25.4 25.6

25.4 25.0

23.2 23.0 23.2

23.4 24.2

24.4 23.4

23.6 23.8

24.0 24.2

24.4 24.0

23.8 24.2

24.4 22.0 22.8 21.6 22.2

24.0 21.8

22.6 23.622.0 22.8 23.4 21.6 22.2 22.8 21.6 22.4 22.8 21.8 22.4 23.2 22.0 22.8 23.4

25.6 25.8

25.6 25.4 25.6
STOP

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

AIRPORT WAY

TACTICAL WAY

EXISTING PAVEMENT

EXISTING PAVEMENT
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
15' SSJID EASEMENT
PER I.N. 2017-038801
25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT DEED PER I.N. 94136296 25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT
DEED PER I.N. 93153195
25' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACCESS PER 31-M-78
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2038-OR-71
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2031-OR-563

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

23.6 24.0

24.0 24.2

23.4 APN: 198-200-017
APN: 198-200-014
APN: 198-200-021

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

PROPOSED BUILDINGHP HPHP

GB GB GB SLOPE

GB GB GB SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE HP

HP GB GB GB GB
SLOPE
SLOPE

HP GB GB GB GB
SLOPE
SLOPE

SLOPE HPHP HPHP HP HPHP HP

GB SLOPE SLOPE

GB GB GB GB HPHP
SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE

GB GB GB GB GB SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE
GB

SLOPE GB

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE

HP HP HP HP

SLOPE HP
SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE

HP SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
GB
SLOPE
SLOPE
FF= 26.10'
HP HP

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE HP SLOPE
SLOPE
HP

SLOPE SLOPE HP HP

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE HP
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE

SLOPE HP HP

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE HPHPHPHP HP HP

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE OFFICE
& MEZZ.

OFFICE
& MEZZ.

OFFICE
& MEZZ.

SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE

SLOPE HP HP SLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE
HP

SLOPEHP
HP
GB
SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE

SLOPE SLOPE

HP SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE

PROPOSED BIORETENTION
AREA (±43,560 SF) HP GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN

AS SHOWN
0 1" =
60 30 60
60' APPROVED
SHEET
NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTIONS REVISIONS NO. CALIFORNIA
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D:

PLOTTED: 10/14/2022 14:25 PLOTTED BY: Corey
DWGNAME: F:\21-2967 Airport Business Centre North\Planning\Planning Plans\C4.1 GRD.dwg C4.1
COPYRIGHT © 2022 NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC
21-2967
CMW
CMW
JC
10/14/2022

MANTECA, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH CONCEPTUAL PLANNING PLANS FOR PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION
Exhibit "B"

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING

ONLY CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY

PROPOSED BUILDING
WV
WV
WV

WV WV WV WV WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV WV
DCDA
CONNECT TO EXISTING 18" SEWER STUB
CONNECT PROPOSED 24" SEWER PIPELINE
INTO EXISTING 30" SEWER STUB NEAR DAISYWOOD DRIVE
W
BFP
WM
W
BFP
WM FS

FS FS FS FS FS

FS FS FS FS
SD SD

SD SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD
SD
DCDA CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" WATER PIPELINE
CONNECT TO EXISTING 30" SD STUB
CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" WATER PIPELINE
WV

WV WV WV WV
W
WM
BFP
CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" WATER PIPELINE
CONNECT TO EXISTING 10" SS STUB
WV
WV
WV WV

SCDA RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE

HYDRANT BEHIND CURB

RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE

HYDRANT BEHIND CURB

RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE

HYDRANT BEHIND CURB

RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE

HYDRANT BEHIND SIDEWALK
WV
24"SS 24"SS 24"SS SS
SD
SS
WV
WV SD

SD SD SD

CONNECT TO EXISTING
18"SS

RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE

HYDRANT BEHIND CURB
CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" WATER PIPELINE

CONNECT TO EXISTING
12" WATER PIPELINE

STUB STORM DRAIN PIPE

FOR FUTURE CONNECTION
SD
OFFICE
& MEZZ.

OFFICE
& MEZZ.

OFFICE
& MEZZ.

W SS STOP
WV

WV WV WV
WV
WV
WV
SS
CONNECT TO EXISTING 10" SEWER
VAN
VAN
VAN

FS FS FS
WV
WV
WV
SD FS
SD SD
SD

SD SD SD
SD
SD

BUBBLE-UP RISER (TYP)

OVERFLOW RISER (TYP)

PROPOSED BIORETENTION
AREA (±43,560 SF)
PP
Ex12"W
EXISTING 6" IRRIGATION HEADWALL
EX-SDCB(5917)
±12.44RIM
±7.44FL(30")E

EXISTING DETENTION BASIN
Ex24"G

EXISTING GAS MARKER POST
ICB
ICB
ICB
ICB
EX-SDMH(12102) ±23.07RIM
±16.40FL(12")W
±7.32FL(54")S,E
EX-SDCB(12133) ±21.83RIM
±19.73FL(12")NE
EX-SDMH(12134) ±22.68RIM
±19.38FL(12")SW
±17.08FL(12")N
±7.57FL(48")W/E
EX-SDMH(12231) ±23.24RIM
±7.93FL(54")W/E
EX-SDMH(12352) ±24.23RIM
±17.68FL(12")NE ±9.91FL(30")N
±8.37FL(48")E
±8.37FL(54")W
EX-SDMH(12341) ±24.09RIM
±11.54FL(15")W
±11.49FL(18")NW
±11.14FL(24")E
±10.04FL(30")S
EX-SDMH(13709) ±25.14RIM
±8.92FL(48")N
±8.80FL(48")W
EX-SSMH(13674)
±25.63RIM
±13.99FL(10")W
±10.63FL(18")S/N
EX-SSMH(12230)
±23.29RIM
±15.54FL(10")S, STUB ±15.48FL(10")E
EX-SSMH(12353)
±24.34RIM
±14.96FL(10")W/E
STOP
WV
WV
WV
WV
WV WV
WV
WV
ELB

JP JP JP
JP
ELB
ELB
EX-IRRMH(12364) ±24.41RIM
BOLTED
EX-ISP(12365)
±32.28RIM
±17.78FL(10")
@BOTTOM
ICP

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
EX. STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN

STRUCTURE
Ex54"SD
Ex54"SD
Ex54"SD
Ex48"SD
Ex10"SS
Ex12"W
Ex12"W
Ex12"W Ex12"W Ex12"W Ex12"W
EX-ISP(12171)
±31.04RIM
±18.04FL(42")E
±FL(42")W, GATE ±FL(42")S, GATE ±17.10@BOTTOM BOX
ICB
JP
Ex30"SD
Ex42"IRR
Ex42"IRR
EX-ISP(12173)
±31.44RIM
±18.84FL(12")
@BOTTOM
ICB
ICP
Ex42"IRR
Ex42"IRR
GV
Ex6"SSFM Ex6"SSFM Ex6"SSFM
EX. STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
ELC

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING POWER POLE

EXISTING STREET LIGHT AND
BOX
EX. STREET LIGHT AND BOX

EXISTING STREET LIGHT AND
BOX
EX. STREET LIGHT AND BOX
EX. STREET LIGHT AND BOX

EXISTING

JUNCTION POLE

EXISTING JUNCTION POLE
AND 6" CONDUIT
EX. JUNCTION POLE

EXISTING JUNCTION POLE

EXISTING JUNCTION POLE
EX-MH(13562)
±25.77RIM

AIRPORT WAY

TACTICAL WAY
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
25'WIDE PRIVATE

RIGHT OF WAY ACCESS
15' SSJID EASEMENT
PER I.N. 2017-038801
25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT DEED PER I.N. 94136296 25' UPRR INGRESS-EGRESS EASEMENT
DEED PER I.N. 93153195
25' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACCESS PER 31-M-78
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2038-OR-71
15' SSJID ESMT
PER 2031-OR-563

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
APN: 198-200-017
APN: 198-200-014
APN: 198-200-021

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

STORMWATER QUALITY NOTE
PROJECT AREA = 21.56 ACRES

BIORETENTION IS PROPOSED TO SATISFY THE TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE MULTI-AGENCY POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER STANDARDS MANUAL, DATED JUNE 2015. TO SATISFY THE

HYDROMODIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE MULTI-AGENCY POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER

STANDARDS MANUAL, RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE WILL BE DISCHARGED INTO AN EXISTING DETENTION BASIN TO THE WEST OF THE PROJECT SITE.

RUNOFF FROM THE FULL PROJECT AREA WILL BE COLLECTED BY THE PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND ROUTED TO A BIORETENTION AREA AT THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROJECT SITE. THE BIORETENTION AREA WILL BE SIZED APPROPRIATELY FOR TREATMENT ACCORDING TO SECTION 6.2 AND APPENDIX F OF THE MULTI-AGENCY POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER STANDARDS MANUAL.

HYDROMODIFICATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY DISCHARGING TO AN EXISTING DETENTION BASIN TO

THE WEST OF THE PROJECT SITE WHICH HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN SIZED AND CONSTRUCTED TO

ACCOMMODATE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE AS IDENTIFIED IN THE CITY OF MANTECA NORTHWEST AIRPORT WAY MASTER PLAN. NO MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING DETENTION BASIN ARE PROPOSED.

LEGEND

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER

SANITARY SEWER

EXISTING STORM DRAIN

STORM DRAIN

EXISTING WATER

DOMESTIC WATER (PRIVATE)

FIRE SERVICE WATER (PRIVATE)

EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL

EXISTING GAS

SEWER MANHOLE

SEWER CLEANOUT

STORM DRAIN INLET

STORM DRAIN CURB INLET

STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

STORM DRAINAGE FILTER

WATER METER

BACKFLOW PREVENTER

WATER VALVE

DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY

AND FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

FIRE HYDRANT
SS
WV WV
SD
FS

W COMPOSITE UTILITY AND STORMWATER QUALITY PLAN

AS SHOWN
0 1" =
60 30 60
60' APPROVED
SHEET
NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTIONS REVISIONS NO. CALIFORNIA
JOB #:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:

DESIGN:

CHK'D:

PLOTTED: 10/14/2022 14:23 PLOTTED BY: Corey
DWGNAME: F:\21-2967 Airport Business Centre North\Planning\Planning Plans\C5.1 UTL.dwg C5.1
COPYRIGHT © 2022 NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC
21-2967
CMW
CMW
JC
10/14/2022

MANTECA, AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH CONCEPTUAL PLANNING PLANS FOR PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION
Exhibit "B"

VAN VAN VAN EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING

ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIR CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL

VANPOOL CLEAN AIR

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

STOP STOP SOUTH AIRPORT WAY

TACTICAL WAY
A' A 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 R.O.W. R.O.W. 9 TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS TO SHADE 60% OF THE DESIGNATED PATH OF TRAVEL WITHIN 15 YEARS OF PLANTING. TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS TO SHADE 60% OF THE DESIGNATED PATH OF TRAVEL WITHIN 15 YEARS OF PLANTING.TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS TO SHADE 60% OF THE DESIGNATED PATH OF TRAVEL WITHIN 15 YEARS OF PLANTING. LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL AT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THREE FEET (3') LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL AT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THREE FEET (3') SHRUBS- SHRUBS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: SYMBOL SHRUB NAME WUCOLS DODONAEA VISCOSA 'PURPUREA', HOPSEED BUSH 5 GAL. SIZE L LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS, TEXAS RANGER 5 GAL. SIZE L WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA, COAST ROSEMARY 5 GAL. SIZE L ROSMARINUS 'TUSCAN BLUE', ROSEMARY SHRUB 5 GAL. SIZE L CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN', DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH 5 GAL. SIZE L LIGUSTRUM TEXANUM, TEXAS PRIVET 5 GAL. SIZE L GROUND COVER AND SHRUB MASSES - GROUND COVER AND SHRUB MASSES SHALL BE CHOSEN FROM THE FOLLOWING: SYMBOL GROUND COVER/SHRUB MASS NAME WUCOLS SENECIO MANDRALISCAEA, BLUE CHALK STICKS 1 GAL. SIZE @ 24" O.C. L ROSMARINUS O. 'PROSTRATUS', CREEPING ROSEMARY 1 GAL. SIZE @ 30" O.C. L SALVIA GREGGII, AUTUMN SAGE 1 GAL. SIZE @ 36" O.C. L MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS, DEER GRASS 1 GAL. SIZE @ 42" O.C. L SALVIA CLEVELANDII, CLEVELAND SAGE 5 GAL. SIZE @ 48" O.C. L BACCHARIS PILULARIS, COYOTE BRUSH 1 GAL. SIZE @ 36" O.C. TREES SYMBOL TREE NAME QTY. WUCOLS PROPOSED STREET TREE ALONG TACTICAL WAY PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA, LONDON PLANE TREE 24" BOX SIZE @ 40'-0" O.C. 19 M STREET TREE ALONG SOUTH AIRPORT WAY KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA, CHINESE FLAME TREE 24" BOX SIZE @ 40'-0" O.C. 26 M STREET TREE AT MEDIAN ISLAND QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA, COAST LIVE OAK 24" BOX SIZE 9 M DROUGHT TOLERANT FLOWERING CANOPY TREE CHITALPA TASHKATENSIS, CHITALPA TREE 36" BOX SIZE. MULTI-TRUNK. 40 VL PARKING LOT SHADE TREE RHUS LANCEA, AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX SIZE. 52 L BACKDROP STREET TREE GEIJERA PARVIFLORA 24" BOX SIZE. 52 M PINUS ELDARICA, MONDELL PINE 24" BOX SIZE. 43 L PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE TREES QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA, COAST LIVE OAK 15 GAL. SIZE. 88 L NOTE: ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE NORTHWEST AIRPORT WAY MASTER PLAN. 34" SIZE CRUSHED ROCK GRAVEL OVER WEED FILTER FABRIC AT TRUCK YARD AREA. 3" LAYER 1 2 6 4 5 7 SOUTH AIRPORT WAY 3 1. 5'-0" MEANDERING SIDEWALK TO BE VERIFIED WITH CIVIL. 2. STREET TREE PER LEGEND. 3. CREATE BERM FOR VISUAL SCREENING FROM STREET. 4. BACKDROP TREE PER PLANT LEGEND. 5. DOUBLE SHRUB HEDGE FOR SCREENING. 6. POSSIBLE BIO-SWALE/VEGETATED INFILTRATION SWALE PER NW AIRPORT WAY MASTER GUIDELINES. 7. PARKING AREA. 8. PARKWAY. (VARIES IN WIDTH) SECTION 'A-A' KEY NOTES: 8 SCOTT PETERSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, INC. 2883 VIA RANCHEROS WAY FALLBROOK, CA 92028 PH: 760-842-8993 NOVEMBER 2, 2022 AMAZON MANTECA MP2D MANTECA, CA CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" 0 40' 80' 120' NORTH L-1 WUCOLS PLANT FACTOR THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN 'WUCOLS' REGION '2- CENTRAL VALLEY'. H = HIGH WATER NEEDS M = MODERATE WATER NEEDS L = LOW WATER NEEDS VL= VERY LOW WATER NEEDS · SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL GROUND COVER PER LEGEND, AND MULCH MATERIAL WITH 'BINDER' MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED FOR EROSION CONTROL. · ROCK RIP-RAP MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE DRAIN LINES CONNECT TO INFILTRATION AREAS. · ALL UTILITY EQUIPMENT SUCH AS TRANSFORMERS, BACKFLOW UNITS, FIRE DETECTOR CHECKS AND FIRE CHECK VALVES WILL BE SCREENED WITH EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL ONCE FINAL LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. GENERAL NOTES: THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT IS BASED ON PRELIMINARY INFORMATION WHICH IS NOT FULLY VERIFIED AND MAY BE INCOMPLETE. IT IS MEANT AS A COMPARATIVE AID IN EXAMINING ALTERNATE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES AND ANY QUANTITIES INDICATED ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION AS MORE RELIABLE INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE. IRRIGATION NOTE: THE PROJECT WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOW FLOW IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF ET WEATHER BASED SMART CONTROLLER, LOW FLOW ROTORS, BUBBLER AND/ OR DRIP SYSTEMS USED THROUGHOUT. THE IRRIGATION WATER EFFICIENCY WILL MEET OR SURPASS THE CURRENT STATE MANDATED AB-1881 WATER ORDINANCE. CONCEPTUAL PLAN NOTE: SECTION A-A' NTS 1. NEW LANDSCAPE MEDIAN ISLAND ALONG SOUTH AIRPORT WAY 2. SIDEWALK PER CIVIL PLANS 3. DROUGHT TOLERANT GROUND COVER AND SHRUBS PER LEGEND 4. FLOWERING ACCENT TREES AT PROJECT ENTRY AND STREET INTERSECTION 5. EVERGREEN SCREEN TREE 6. SCREEN SHRUBS ALONG PROPERTY LINE 7. SCREEN SHRUBS ALONG PARKING LOT AREA 8. 34" CRUSHED ROCK GRAVEL OVER WEED FILTER FABRIC AT TRUCK YARD AREA 9. DETENTION BASIN PER CIVIL DWGS. DESIGN KEY NOTES The project shall comply with the more restrictive of the outdoor potable water reduction requirements of the California Green Building Standards Code 4.304 and the Manteca Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES = 320 TREES PROPOSED 25% REQUIRED TO BE 24" BOX SIZE = 80 TREES REQUIRED TO BE 24" BOX SIZE OR LARGER TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED 24" BOX SIZE OR LARGER TREES = 231 TREES TO BE 24" BOX SIZE OR LARGER TREE SIZING TABLE

AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH

MANTECA, CA

HYDROSEED APPLICATION AT STORM WATER DETENTION BASIN
Exhibit "B"

VAN VAN
VAN

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING

ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY

EV CHARGINGONLY

EV CHARGINGONLY

EV CHARGINGONLY

EV CHARGINGONLY

EV CHARGINGONLY

EV CHARGINGONLY

EV CHARGINGONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

EV CHARGING
ONLY

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR VANPOOL CLEAN AIR

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

VANPOOL

VANPOOL

CLEAN AIR

CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

CLEAN AIRVANPOOL

CLEAN AIRVANPOOL
STOP
STOP
R60'

MONUMENT SIGN
Plan View
Scale - 1/64" = 1ft

1.9 2.8

2.7 3.9

3.6 3.2

2.7 2.4

2.4 2.4

2.4 5.1

4.4 3.6

2.9 2.7

2.7 2.7

2.7 6.8

5.5 4.2

3.4 3.2

3.0 2.9

3.0 9.4

3.3 3.1

3.3 3.4

3.2 3.4

4.1 3.4

3.1 3.3

3.2 2.4

1.6 1.1

2.8 2.3

1.6 1.1

2.4 2.1

1.6 1.1

2.2 1.9

1.5 1.2

1.9 1.6

1.4 1.2

1.6 1.5

1.4 1.2

1.5 1.4

1.4 1.4

1.6 1.6

1.7 1.7

1.8 2.0

2.2 2.2

2.3 2.7

3.0 3.1

3.3 3.8

4.1 2.9

3.6 4.6

5.4 3.3

4.3 5.9

7.3 3.8

5.4 7.8

10.0 4.2

6.1 9.6

4.1 5.9

9.2 11.8

3.6 5.0

7.0 8.9

3.1 4.0

5.3 6.4

2.8 3.5

4.3 4.8

2.5 3.1

3.5 3.8

2.4 2.7

2.8 1.6

1.8 2.0

2.1 1.2

1.4 1.6

1.7 1.2

1.3 1.6

1.7 1.4

1.6 1.9

2.0 1.8

2.1 2.4

2.6 2.2

2.7 3.2

3.5 2.5

3.1 3.8

4.4 2.8

3.4 4.4

5.6 3.2

4.0 5.6

7.5 3.7

4.7 7.2

10.2 3.9

4.9 7.8

11.7 3.7

4.6 7.0

9.7 3.2

4.0 5.4

7.2 2.8

3.4 4.4

5.4 2.7

3.2 3.9

4.4 3.0

3.4 3.6

2.6 2.7

2.8 2.8

2.5 2.4

2.3 2.2

2.5 2.2

2.1 1.8

2.5 2.2

1.9 1.5

2.5 2.2

1.8 1.4

2.9 2.4

1.7 1.2

2.5 1.7

1.2 2.4

1.6 1.1

11.8 2.4

1.6 1.1

8.9 7.0

4.9 3.6

3.1 2.4

1.6 1.1

6.5 5.3

4.0 3.1

2.7 2.3

1.6 1.1

4.9 4.3

3.5 2.8

2.3 2.0

1.6 1.1

3.7 3.5

2.1 1.8

1.5 1.2

2.7 1.6

1.4 1.2

1.6 1.4

1.3 1.2

1.5 1.4

1.5 1.5

1.6 1.6

1.8 1.8

1.8 2.1

2.3 2.5

2.2 2.7

3.1 3.4

2.5 3.0

3.7 4.3

3.3 4.3

5.4 3.2

3.9 5.5

7.3 3.7

4.6 7.0

9.8 3.9

4.9 7.8

11.7 3.7

4.7 7.1

10.0 3.2

4.0 5.6

7.4 3.4

4.4 5.5

2.5 3.1

3.8 4.4

2.2 2.7

3.1 3.5

1.8 2.1

2.4 2.6

1.4 1.6

1.9 2.0

1.2 1.4

1.6 1.8

1.3 1.5

1.7 1.8

1.7 1.9

2.1 2.2

2.2 2.5

2.8 2.9

2.6 3.2

3.7 4.0

3.6 4.5

5.2 3.2

4.2 5.7

6.9 3.8

5.3 7.6

9.5 4.2

6.2 9.7

12.3 4.2

6.2 9.7

12.4 3.8

5.3 7.7

9.6 3.2

4.3 5.7

6.9 2.9

3.6 4.5

5.2 2.7

3.2 3.7

4.0 2.2

2.6 2.9

3.0 2.0

2.2 2.3

1.4 1.6

1.8 1.9

1.3 1.5

1.7 1.9

1.6 1.8

2.1 2.2

1.9 2.3

2.6 2.9

2.3 2.8

3.3 3.7

2.5 3.1

3.9 4.6

2.8 3.5

4.6 5.9

3.3 4.1

5.9 8.0

3.8 4.7

7.4 10.7

3.8 4.8

7.7 11.4

4.4 6.6

9.0 5.9

7.9 5.3

6.8 4.7

5.8 0.9

0.8 0.8

0.9 1.0

1.1 1.2

1.3 1.3

1.3 1.3

1.4 1.3

1.3 1.2

1.2 1.1

1.1 1.1

1.0 1.1

1.0 1.0

1.2 1.4

1.5 1.7

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.9

1.8 1.8

1.7 1.7

1.5 1.5

1.4 1.4

1.4 1.4

1.3 1.2

1.2 1.2

1.1 1.0

1.3 1.3

1.4 1.6

1.8 2.0

2.2 2.4

2.5 2.5

2.5 2.5

2.4 2.3

2.2 2.1

2.0 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.8 1.8

1.7 1.7

1.6 1.5

1.4 1.2

1.6 1.6

1.7 2.0

2.3 2.6

2.8 3.1

3.2 3.3

3.3 3.2

3.0 2.9

2.8 2.6

2.6 2.5

2.5 2.5

2.4 2.4

2.4 2.3

2.2 2.0

1.8 1.6

1.4 1.9

1.9 2.1

2.4 2.7

3.0 3.4

3.7 3.9

3.9 3.9

3.8 3.6

3.5 3.3

3.3 3.2

3.1 3.1

3.1 3.2

3.2 3.2

3.1 2.9

2.6 2.3

2.0 1.7

1.4 2.0

2.1 2.4

2.8 3.1

3.5 4.0

4.4 4.7

4.8 4.7

4.5 4.2

4.0 3.9

3.8 3.7

3.7 3.7

3.7 3.8

3.9 3.9

3.7 3.5

3.2 2.8

2.5 2.1

1.7 1.3

1.8 2.3

2.9 3.4

4.0 4.7

5.5 5.9

6.0 5.9

5.5 5.0

4.6 4.4

4.4 4.3

4.2 4.2

4.3 4.5

4.6 4.6

4.4 4.1

3.7 3.2

2.8 2.4

1.9 1.4

1.9 2.6

3.2 3.7

4.5 5.6

6.4 6.7

6.8 6.9

6.5 5.7

5.1 4.9

4.8 4.7

4.6 4.7

4.9 5.4

5.7 5.7

5.5 5.0

4.3 3.7

3.2 2.7

2.2 1.4

2.0 2.7

3.4 4.0

5.0 6.2

6.8 7.0

7.2 7.2

7.0 6.3

5.5 5.2

5.2 5.1

5.0 5.1

5.7 6.4

6.7 6.6

6.5 6.1

5.2 4.2

3.5 3.0

2.4 1.8

1.3 1.9

2.7 3.4

4.0 5.1

6.2 6.9

5.5 5.8

6.5 7.1

6.4 5.5

5.2 5.3

5.3 5.2

5.4 6.3

7.0 7.1

7.1 6.9

6.7 5.9

4.7 3.8

3.2 2.5

1.9 1.4

2.0 2.7

3.4 4.0

5.1 6.2

6.8 7.0

7.2 7.2

7.1 6.3

5.5 5.3

5.4 5.4

5.3 5.7

6.6 7.2

7.3 7.5

7.2 6.9

6.1 4.9

3.9 3.3

2.6 1.8

1.4 1.9

2.6 3.2

3.8 4.6

5.8 6.5

6.8 6.9

7.0 6.7

5.8 5.2

5.1 5.3

5.3 5.3

5.7 6.6

7.2 7.3

7.4 7.1

6.8 6.1

4.9 3.9

3.3 2.6

1.9 1.4

1.8 2.4

3.0 3.5

4.1 4.9

5.7 6.2

6.3 6.3

5.8 5.2

4.9 4.9

5.0 5.1

5.1 5.4

6.2 6.9

7.1 7.0

6.9 6.6

5.8 4.6

3.8 3.2

2.5 1.9

1.3 1.7

2.2 2.7

3.1 3.6

4.1 4.6

5.0 5.2

5.1 4.9

4.6 4.5

4.5 4.6

4.7 4.7

4.9 5.5

6.2 6.5

6.5 6.4

5.9 5.0

4.1 3.5

3.0 2.4

1.8 1.1

1.5 2.0

2.4 2.8

3.2 3.6

3.9 4.1

4.3 4.2

4.2 4.1

4.0 4.0

4.1 4.2

4.3 4.4

4.7 5.1

5.4 5.4

5.3 4.8

4.2 3.7

3.2 2.7

2.2 1.7

1.0 1.3

1.7 2.2

2.5 2.8

3.1 3.4

3.6 3.7

3.7 3.6

3.6 3.5

3.5 3.6

3.7 3.8

3.9 4.1

4.2 4.4

4.4 4.3

4.0 3.7

3.3 2.9

2.4 2.0

1.5 0.9

1.5 1.7

1.9 2.2

2.4 2.6

2.8 2.9

3.0 3.0

3.0 3.0

3.0 3.0

3.0 3.1

3.2 3.4

3.5 3.7

3.8 3.8

3.7 3.5

3.2 2.9

2.5 2.2

1.7 1.4

1.4 1.4

1.5 1.7

1.9 2.0

2.2 2.2

2.3 2.4

2.4 2.4

2.4 2.4

2.5 2.5

2.6 2.7

2.9 3.0

3.1 3.2

3.2 3.1

3.0 2.8

2.5 2.2

1.9 1.5

1.2 1.4

1.3 1.4

1.5 1.7

1.8 1.9

1.9 1.9

2.0 2.0

2.0 2.0

2.0 2.0

2.1 2.2

2.3 2.4

2.5 2.6

2.6 2.6

2.5 2.4

2.3 2.1

1.9 1.6

1.3 1.1

1.4 1.3

1.3 1.5

1.6 1.7

1.7 1.8

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.9

2.0 2.1

2.2 2.2

2.2 2.2

2.1 2.1

1.9 1.7

1.4 1.2

1.0 1.4

1.4 1.4

1.5 1.6

1.7 1.7

1.7 1.8

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.7

1.7 1.6

1.6 1.7

1.7 1.8

1.9 2.0

2.0 2.0

2.0 2.0

1.9 1.8

1.6 1.4

1.2 1.0

1.5 1.5

1.6 1.7

1.8 1.8

1.9 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.9 1.8

1.7 1.7

1.6 1.6

1.6 1.7

1.8 1.9

2.0 2.1

2.0 2.0

2.0 2.0

1.9 1.7

1.5 1.3

1.0 1.7

1.7 1.9

2.0 2.1

2.2 2.2

2.2 2.2

2.2 2.1

2.1 2.0

1.8 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.8 1.9

2.1 2.2

2.2 2.3

2.3 2.2

2.2 2.1

1.9 1.7

1.5 1.2

1.9 2.0

2.2 2.4

2.5 2.7

2.8 2.8

2.8 2.7

2.6 2.4

2.3 2.1

2.0 1.9

1.9 2.0

2.2 2.3

2.5 2.6

2.7 2.8

2.7 2.7

2.5 2.3

2.0 1.7

1.4 2.2

2.4 2.6

2.8 3.1

3.3 3.4

3.5 3.4

3.3 3.1

2.9 2.6

2.4 2.3

2.2 2.2

2.3 2.5

2.7 2.9

3.1 3.3

3.4 3.4

3.2 3.0

2.7 2.4

2.1 1.7

2.4 2.7

3.0 3.2

3.5 3.8

4.0 4.0

3.9 3.8

3.5 3.3

3.0 2.8

2.6 2.5

2.5 2.7

2.8 3.1

3.3 3.6

3.7 3.9

3.9 3.7

3.5 3.2

2.8 2.4

2.0 2.7

3.0 3.3

3.7 4.1

4.5 4.8

4.8 4.7

4.4 4.1

3.7 3.4

3.2 2.9

2.8 2.8

3.0 3.2

3.5 3.7

4.1 4.4

4.6 4.6

4.4 4.1

3.6 3.2

2.8 2.3

2.9 3.3

3.7 4.1

4.7 5.5

5.9 6.0

5.9 5.4

4.8 4.2

3.8 3.5

3.2 3.0

3.0 3.2

3.5 3.8

4.2 4.8

5.4 5.7

5.7 5.5

4.9 4.2

3.6 3.1

2.6 3.1

3.6 4.0

4.6 5.5

6.4 6.7

6.7 6.7

6.4 5.5

4.6 4.1

3.8 3.4

3.2 3.2

3.5 3.8

4.1 4.8

5.7 6.4

6.6 6.5

6.4 5.9

4.8 4.0

3.4 2.8

3.2 3.7

4.2 4.9

6.1 6.8

7.0 7.1

7.0 6.8

6.1 5.0

4.3 4.0

3.5 3.2

3.3 3.6

4.0 4.4

5.2 6.3

6.8 6.9

6.9 6.8

6.4 5.4

4.3 3.6

3.0 3.2

3.7 4.1

4.9 6.0

6.8 7.1

5.7 7.1

6.8 6.0

5.0 4.2

3.9 3.4

3.1 3.2

3.6 4.0

4.4 5.4

6.4 7.0

6.3 7.3

6.1 6.6

5.6 4.4

3.6 3.0

3.2 3.7

4.2 5.0

6.1 6.8

7.0 7.1

7.0 6.8

6.1 5.0

4.3 4.0

3.5 3.2

3.3 3.7

4.1 4.5

5.4 6.4

6.9 7.0

7.1 6.9

6.5 5.6

4.4 3.7

3.0 3.2

3.6 4.0

4.6 5.6

6.5 6.8

6.8 6.8

6.5 5.6

4.7 4.2

3.8 3.4

3.2 3.2

3.6 4.0

4.3 5.0

6.0 6.7

6.8 6.8

6.7 6.2

5.1 4.1

3.5 2.9

3.0 3.4

3.8 4.3

4.9 5.7

6.2 6.2

6.2 5.7

5.0 4.3

3.9 3.6

3.3 3.1

3.1 3.4

3.7 4.0

4.5 5.2

5.9 6.2

6.2 6.0

5.4 4.5

3.8 3.2

2.7 2.9

3.2 3.5

3.9 4.3

4.8 5.1

5.2 5.1

4.8 4.4

4.0 3.6

3.4 3.1

2.9 2.9

3.1 3.4

3.6 4.0

4.4 4.8

5.1 5.1

4.8 4.4

3.9 3.4

2.9 2.4

2.7 3.0

3.3 3.6

3.9 4.2

4.4 4.5

4.4 4.2

3.9 3.6

3.3 3.1

2.8 4.1

4.0 3.7

3.4 3.0

2.6 2.2

2.5 2.8

3.0 3.3

3.6 3.9

4.0 4.1

4.0 3.8

3.6 3.3

3.0 2.8

2.5 3.6

3.5 3.3

3.0 2.6

2.3 1.9

2.3 2.6

2.8 3.1

3.3 3.5

3.6 3.5

3.5 3.4

3.3 3.0

2.8 2.5

2.3 3.0

2.9 2.8

2.5 2.3

1.9 1.6

2.2 2.4

2.7 2.9

3.1 3.2

3.2 3.2

3.2 3.2

3.0 2.8

2.6 2.3

2.1 2.4

2.3 2.3

2.1 1.9

1.7 1.4

2.3 2.4

2.7 2.9

3.1 3.2

3.2 3.2

3.2 3.2

3.0 2.8

2.6 2.3

2.0 2.0

2.0 1.9

1.8 1.7

1.4 1.2

2.4 2.6

2.8 3.1

3.3 3.5

3.6 3.6

3.6 3.4

3.2 3.0

2.7 2.4

2.1 1.8

1.8 1.8

1.7 1.6

1.4 1.1

2.5 2.7

3.0 3.3

3.6 3.9

4.0 4.1

4.0 3.8

3.6 3.3

2.9 2.6

2.2 1.9

1.9 1.8

1.7 1.6

1.4 1.2

2.7 2.9

3.3 3.6

3.9 4.2

4.4 4.5

4.4 4.2

3.9 3.5

3.2 2.8

2.4 2.0

2.0 2.0

1.9 1.8

1.5 1.3

2.9 3.2

3.5 3.9

4.4 4.8

5.1 5.2

5.1 4.8

4.3 3.9

3.5 3.1

2.6 2.5

2.4 2.4

2.3 2.1

1.8 1.6

3.0 3.4

3.8 4.3

5.0 5.8

6.2 6.3

6.2 5.7

5.0 4.3

3.8 3.3

2.9 3.1

3.1 2.9

2.7 2.5

2.2 1.8

3.2 3.7

4.1 4.7

5.7 6.6

6.9 6.9

6.9 6.5

5.7 4.7

4.0 3.6

3.1 3.7

3.6 3.5

3.2 2.9

2.6 2.2

3.2 3.8

4.2 5.0

6.2 6.9

7.1 7.2

7.0 6.9

6.2 5.0

4.2 3.8

3.3 4.2

4.2 4.0

3.7 3.3

2.9 2.5

3.2 3.8

4.2 5.0

6.1 6.9

5.5 7.5

5.5 6.9

6.1 5.0

4.2 3.8

3.3 5.3

5.3 4.9

4.4 3.8

3.3 2.8

3.2 3.8

4.2 5.0

6.1 6.9

7.0 7.1

7.0 6.8

6.1 5.0

4.3 3.9

3.4 6.3

6.3 6.0

5.3 4.3

3.6 3.1

3.1 3.6

4.0 4.6

5.6 6.5

6.8 6.8

6.8 6.4

5.6 4.7

4.1 3.7

3.3 6.8

6.8 6.6

6.0 4.9

4.0 3.4

3.0 3.4

3.8 4.2

4.9 5.6

6.1 6.1

6.0 5.6

4.9 4.3

3.8 3.5

3.1 7.1

7.0 6.9

6.3 5.2

4.1 2.8

3.2 3.5

3.9 4.3

4.7 5.0

5.1 5.0

4.7 4.3

3.9 3.6

3.3 2.9

7.2 7.1

6.9 6.4

5.3 4.1

2.7 2.9

3.2 3.5

3.9 4.2

4.3 4.4

4.3 4.2

3.9 3.6

3.3 3.1

2.8 6.9

6.8 6.7

6.1 5.0

4.0 2.5

2.7 3.0

3.3 3.6

3.8 4.0

4.0 4.0

3.8 3.6

3.4 3.1

2.8 2.6

6.4 6.4

6.2 5.4

4.4 3.7

2.3 2.5

2.8 3.0

3.3 3.4

3.5 3.5

3.5 3.5

3.3 3.1

2.9 2.7

2.5 5.5

5.5 5.1

4.5 3.9

3.4 2.2

2.4 2.7

2.9 3.1

3.2 3.3

3.2 3.3

3.3 3.1

3.0 2.8

2.5 2.4

4.4 4.4

4.1 3.8

3.4 3.0

2.2 2.4

2.7 2.9

3.2 3.3

3.4 3.4

3.4 3.3

3.2 3.0

2.8 2.5

2.3 3.8

3.7 3.6

3.3 3.0

2.6 2.3

2.6 2.8

3.1 3.4

3.6 3.8

3.8 3.8

3.7 3.5

3.2 3.0

2.6 2.4

3.2 3.2

3.0 2.8

2.6 2.3

2.5 2.7

3.0 3.4

3.7 4.0

4.2 4.3

4.2 4.1

3.8 3.5

3.1 2.8

2.5 2.6

2.5 2.5

2.3 2.2

1.9 2.6

3.0 3.3

3.6 4.0

4.3 4.6

4.7 4.7

4.5 4.1

3.8 3.4

3.0 2.6

2.1 2.1

2.0 2.0

1.8 1.6

2.8 3.1

3.5 3.9

4.4 5.0

5.4 5.6

5.6 5.2

4.7 4.1

3.6 3.2

2.8 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.8 1.6

1.4 2.9

3.3 3.8

4.2 5.0

5.9 6.5

6.5 6.5

6.2 5.4

4.5 3.9

3.4 2.9

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.7

1.6 1.4

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5

5.5 6.5

6.9 7.0

7.0 6.8

6.1 5.0

4.2 3.7

3.1 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.8 1.7

1.5 3.0

3.6 4.1

4.7 5.9

6.7 7.0

7.3 7.1

7.0 6.4

5.3 4.3

3.8 3.2

2.2 2.2

2.2 2.1

1.9 1.7

3.0 3.6

4.0 4.7

5.8 6.7

7.0 7.3

7.1 7.0

6.4 5.3

4.3 3.8

3.2 2.8

2.8 2.7

2.5 2.3

2.1 3.0

3.5 3.9

4.5 5.5

6.5 6.9

6.9 6.9

6.8 6.1

5.0 4.2

3.8 3.3

3.4 3.4

3.3 3.0

2.8 2.4

2.8 3.3

3.7 4.1

4.9 5.8

6.4 6.5

6.5 6.2

5.4 4.6

4.0 3.6

3.2 4.0

3.9 3.8

3.5 3.2

2.8 2.7

3.0 3.4

3.8 4.2

4.8 5.3

5.5 5.5

5.1 4.6

4.1 3.7

3.3 3.0

4.8 4.8

4.5 4.1

3.6 3.2

2.5 2.8

3.1 3.4

3.7 4.1

4.3 4.4

4.4 4.2

3.9 3.6

3.3 3.1

2.9 6.0

6.0 5.6

4.9 4.1

3.5 2.2

2.5 2.7

3.0 3.3

3.5 3.7

3.8 3.8

3.6 3.5

3.2 3.0

2.8 2.6

6.7 6.7

6.5 5.8

4.7 3.8

2.0 2.2

2.4 2.6

2.9 3.0

3.2 3.2

3.2 3.1

3.0 2.8

2.6 2.5

2.3 7.0

6.9 6.8

6.3 5.1

4.1 1.8

1.9 2.1

2.3 2.4

2.5 2.6

2.6 2.6

2.6 2.5

2.4 2.2

2.1 2.0

5.5 6.3

6.8 6.2

5.1 4.0

1.7 1.7

1.8 2.0

2.1 2.1

2.2 2.1

2.2 2.2

2.1 2.1

2.0 1.9

1.9 7.0

6.9 6.8

6.2 5.1

4.1 1.6

1.6 1.7

1.8 1.9

2.0 2.0

1.9 2.0

2.0 2.0

1.9 1.9

1.8 1.8

6.7 6.7

6.4 5.7

4.6 3.8

1.6 1.6

1.7 1.8

1.9 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.9 2.0

2.0 1.9

1.8 1.8

1.8 5.9

5.9 5.6

4.8 4.1

3.5 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.9 2.0

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.1

2.0 1.9

1.8 1.8

4.8 4.7

4.5 4.0

3.6 3.1

1.8 1.8

2.0 2.1

2.3 2.4

2.5 2.5

2.5 2.5

2.4 2.3

2.2 2.0

1.9 4.0

3.9 3.7

3.5 3.1

2.8 2.0

2.1 2.3

2.6 2.8

3.0 3.1

3.1 3.1

3.0 2.9

2.7 2.5

2.3 2.1

3.4 3.4

3.2 3.0

2.7 2.4

2.3 2.5

2.7 3.0

3.3 3.5

3.7 3.8

3.8 3.6

3.4 3.2

2.9 2.6

2.3 2.7

2.7 2.6

2.5 2.2

2.0 2.5

2.8 3.1

3.4 3.8

4.1 4.3

4.4 4.4

4.2 4.0

3.6 3.3

2.9 2.6

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.0

1.8 1.6

2.8 3.1

3.5 3.9

4.4 4.9

5.3 5.5

5.4 5.1

4.6 4.2

3.7 3.3

2.8 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.7 1.5

1.3 3.0

3.5 3.9

4.4 5.1

6.0 6.6

6.7 6.7

6.4 5.6

4.8 4.2

3.7 3.1

2.6 2.2

1.9 1.8

1.7 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.6 1.6

1.6 1.5

1.5 1.3

1.2 3.2

3.8 4.3

5.0 6.0

7.0 7.5

7.6 7.6

7.4 6.6

5.5 4.7

4.1 3.4

2.8 2.3

2.0 1.8

1.7 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.6 1.6

1.5 1.5

1.4 1.3

1.1 3.4

4.1 4.7

5.4 6.7

7.6 8.0

8.2 8.1

8.0 7.4

6.2 5.1

4.5 3.7

3.0 2.4

2.1 1.9

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.6 1.6

1.5 1.3

1.2 3.5

4.2 4.8

5.6 6.9

8.0 7.6

6.9 8.4

7.7 6.5

5.3 4.6

3.9 3.1

2.5 2.2

2.0 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.9 1.8

1.8 1.6

1.4 1.3

3.6 4.3

4.9 5.7

7.0 8.1

8.6 8.7

8.8 8.6

7.9 6.6

5.6 4.9

4.1 3.3

2.8 2.4

2.3 2.1

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.2

2.1 2.0

1.9 1.8

1.6 1.4

3.6 4.2

4.9 5.6

6.6 7.8

8.5 8.7

8.8 8.5

7.6 6.4

5.5 4.9

4.2 3.5

2.9 2.6

2.4 2.3

2.3 2.3

2.4 2.4

2.4 2.3

2.2 1.9

1.7 1.5

3.5 4.1

4.7 5.4

6.2 7.1

8.1 8.5

8.5 8.1

7.2 6.2

5.4 4.8

4.1 3.5

3.0 2.7

2.6 2.5

2.5 2.7

2.9 3.0

2.9 2.8

2.5 2.2

1.9 1.6

3.3 3.9

4.5 5.1

5.8 6.6

7.4 7.8

7.8 7.5

7.0 6.1

5.3 4.7

4.1 3.5

3.0 2.8

2.7 2.6

2.7 3.0

3.3 3.4

3.3 3.3

3.0 2.5

2.1 1.8

3.5 3.3

2.8 2.2

1.9 3.4

3.0 2.3

1.9 3.0

2.3 1.9

3.3 2.8

2.2 1.9

2.9 2.5

2.1 1.8

2.5 2.2

1.9 1.6

2.2 2.0

1.8 1.5

2.0 1.9

1.7 1.4

1.9 1.8

1.6 1.4

1.8 1.7

1.5 1.3

1.9 1.7

1.6 1.3

2.0 1.8

1.6 1.4

2.1 2.0

1.7 1.5

2.4 2.1

1.9 1.6

2.8 2.4

2.0 1.7

3.2 2.7

2.2 1.8

3.3 2.9

2.3 1.9

3.3 2.8

2.2 1.8

3.4 3.3

2.8 2.2

1.9 3.3

3.1 2.5

2.1 1.7

2.9 2.6

2.2 1.9

1.6 2.3

2.1 1.9

1.6 1.4

1.9 1.8

1.6 1.4

1.2 1.0

1.0 0.9

1.9 1.8

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.8

1.7 1.6

1.4 1.3

1.4 1.5

1.6 1.8

2.3 2.6

2.7 2.8

2.7 2.6

2.4 2.1

1.9 1.7

1.6 1.6

1.8 2.0

2.3 2.5

2.7 2.8

2.7 2.4

2.1 1.9

1.7 1.6

1.6 1.6

1.8 2.0

2.3 2.5

2.7 2.8

2.7 2.6

2.4 2.1

1.9 1.6

2.6 2.7

2.7 2.7

3.1 3.5

3.7 3.6

3.2 2.7

2.4 2.2

2.0 1.8

1.8 1.9

2.2 2.4

2.6 3.0

3.5 3.7

3.6 3.2

2.7 2.4

2.2 2.0

1.8 1.8

1.9 2.2

2.4 2.6

3.0 3.5

3.7 3.6

3.2 2.8

2.5 2.3

1.9 3.0

3.1 3.1

3.1 3.6

4.2 4.5

4.3 3.8

3.2 3.0

2.7 2.3

2.0 2.0

2.2 2.6

2.9 3.1

3.6 4.2

4.5 4.3

3.8 3.2

3.0 2.7

2.3 2.0

2.0 2.2

2.6 2.9

3.1 3.6

4.2 4.5

4.3 3.8

3.3 3.0

2.8 2.3

1.8 4.9

6.2 6.9

6.5 5.2

4.2 3.7

3.2 2.7

2.3 2.2

2.5 3.1

3.6 4.0

4.9 6.2

6.9 6.5

5.2 4.2

3.7 3.2

2.7 2.3

2.2 2.5

3.0 3.6

4.0 4.9

6.2 7.0

6.5 5.3

4.3 3.8

3.2 2.6

2.0 2.8

3.4 4.2

5.1 6.6

8.9 9.6

7.2 5.5

4.5 3.7

2.8 2.3

4.4 5.1

5.8 6.2

6.3 6.3

6.1 5.7

5.1 3.7

3.2 2.8

2.6 2.5

2.6 2.7

3.1 3.5

3.7 4.4

5.1 5.4

5.5 5.5

5.4 5.1

4.5 3.4

3.0 2.6

2.5 2.5

2.5 2.6

3.0 3.4

2.3 2.8

3.3 3.7

4.3 4.7

4.8 4.9

4.8 4.4

3.8 3.4

3.0 2.7

2.4 2.3

2.3 2.4

2.5 2.7

3.1 3.4

3.4 2.1

2.5 2.9

3.2 3.6

3.9 4.1

4.1 4.0

3.7 3.3

3.0 2.7

2.4 2.2

2.1 2.1

2.2 2.3

2.4 2.7

2.9 3.0

1.9 2.3

2.6 2.9

3.1 3.3

3.1 3.4

3.2 2.9

2.4 2.2

2.0 1.9

2.0 2.0

2.1 2.2

2.4 2.5

2.5 1.8

2.1 2.4

2.7 2.9

3.1 3.0

2.8 2.6

2.1 2.0

1.8 1.8

1.8 2.0

2.1 2.2

2.3 2.3

1.8 2.1

2.4 2.6

2.7 2.9

2.7 2.8

2.6 2.4

1.9 1.8

1.6 1.6

1.6 1.7

1.8 1.9

2.0 2.1

2.1 1.8

2.1 2.3

2.6 2.7

2.7 2.7

2.6 2.4

2.2 1.8

1.6 1.5

1.5 1.5

1.6 1.7

1.8 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.8 2.1

2.4 2.6

2.7 2.7

2.6 2.5

2.4 2.3

2.1 1.9

1.7 1.5

1.4 1.4

1.5 1.6

1.7 1.8

1.9 1.9

2.0 1.9

2.1 2.4

2.6 2.8

2.8 2.7

2.5 2.4

2.2 2.0

1.8 1.6

1.5 1.4

1.4 1.5

1.6 1.8

1.9 2.0

2.4 2.5

2.8 3.1

3.2 3.2

3.0 2.7

2.5 2.2

2.0 1.8

1.6 1.5

1.4 1.5

1.6 1.7

1.8 2.0

2.1 2.2

2.3 8.0

8.5 3.2

3.5 3.6

3.5 3.1

2.6 2.3

2.1 1.6

1.5 1.4

1.5 1.6

1.8 1.9

2.1 2.3

2.4 2.5

6.7 7.2

4.4 5.7

7.8 10.5

10.2 7.5

5.6 4.5

3.6 2.8

2.5 2.5

2.8 3.6

4.5 5.6

7.5 10.3

10.6 7.8

5.8 4.6

3.5 3.7

3.7 3.6

3.3 2.8

2.4 2.1

1.6 1.4

1.4 1.5

1.7 1.9

2.0 2.3

2.6 2.9

3.0 5.5

5.8 3.8

4.6 5.9

7.7 8.6

7.5 5.8

4.6 3.9

3.3 2.6

2.3 2.3

2.6 3.3

3.9 4.6

5.8 7.6

8.6 7.7

6.0 4.7

4.0 3.4

2.8 2.4

2.4 2.7

3.4 4.0

4.7 6.0

7.8 8.7

7.8 6.1

4.9 4.3

3.8 3.3

3.0 2.8

2.7 3.1

3.5 3.7

3.8 3.4

2.9 2.4

2.1 1.6

1.4 1.4

1.5 1.7

2.2 2.5

3.0 3.3

3.4 5.0

5.3 5.0

4.1 3.5

3.2 2.9

2.3 2.0

2.0 2.3

2.9 3.2

3.5 4.2

5.0 5.3

5.0 4.2

3.6 3.3

2.9 2.4

2.1 2.1

2.4 2.9

3.3 3.6

4.3 5.1

5.4 5.1

4.4 3.9

3.7 3.4

3.1 2.8

2.6 2.6

3.0 3.4

3.6 3.7

3.3 2.8

2.3 2.0

1.5 1.3

1.3 1.5

1.8 2.3

2.8 3.3

3.5 3.5

4.0 3.8

3.2 2.8

2.6 2.3

2.0 1.8

1.8 2.4

2.6 2.8

3.2 3.8

4.0 3.8

3.3 2.8

2.4 2.1

1.9 1.9

2.1 2.4

2.6 2.8

3.3 3.9

4.1 4.0

3.5 3.2

3.1 3.0

2.8 2.6

2.4 2.4

2.7 3.2

3.4 3.5

3.5 3.4

3.1 2.6

2.2 1.9

1.7 1.4

1.3 1.3

1.5 1.8

2.0 2.3

2.9 3.3

2.7 3.7

2.2 2.0

1.7 1.6

1.6 2.0

2.2 2.5

2.8 3.1

3.2 3.1

2.9 2.5

2.0 1.8

1.7 1.7

1.8 2.0

2.2 2.5

2.9 3.3

3.3 3.1

2.8 2.6

2.6 2.5

2.3 2.3

2.4 2.8

3.1 3.2

3.2 3.1

2.7 2.3

2.0 1.8

1.6 1.4

1.3 1.3

1.5 1.8

2.0 2.3

2.8 3.3

3.5 3.5

2.2 2.3

2.4 2.4

2.3 2.2

2.1 2.1

2.0 2.1

2.3 2.5

2.7 2.6

2.5 2.2

2.0 1.8

1.6 1.4

1.3 1.2

1.3 1.4

1.7 1.9

2.1 2.6

3.1 3.3

3.4 1.8

1.9 2.0

2.1 1.6

1.7 1.7

1.8 1.3

1.4 1.4

1.4 5.9

10.7 12.6

12.3 12.3

8.9 3.4

3.3 2.7

2.0 1.5

1.2 4.6

4.3 3.2

2.3 1.9

1.6 5.6

4.9 3.5

2.7 2.1

1.7 5.1

4.7 3.5

2.6 2.1

1.7 4.0

3.9 3.2

2.4 2.0

1.7 3.0

3.1 2.7

2.3 1.9

1.8 2.3

2.5 2.4

2.1 1.9

1.9 2.0

2.3 2.2

2.1 2.0

2.0 1.9

2.2 2.2

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.1

2.4 2.4

2.3 2.2

2.3 2.5

2.8 2.7

2.5 2.4

2.5 3.3

3.5 3.1

2.7 2.5

2.6 4.5

4.4 3.6

2.9 2.6

2.7 5.6

5.1 3.9

3.2 2.7

2.7 5.6

5.1 3.9

3.2 2.8

2.7 4.5

4.5 3.6

3.0 2.7

2.7 3.4

3.5 3.1

2.7 2.5

2.6 2.5

2.8 2.7

2.5 2.4

2.4 2.1

2.4 2.4

2.3 2.2

2.3 1.9

2.2 2.2

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.0

2.3 2.2

2.1 2.0

2.1 2.3

2.6 2.4

2.3 2.1

2.1 3.0

3.2 2.9

2.5 2.2

2.2 4.1

4.1 3.4

2.7 2.4

2.3 5.2

4.9 3.8

3.0 2.6

2.4 5.8

5.2 3.9

3.2 2.7

2.6 4.8

4.7 3.7

3.0 2.7

2.6 3.7

3.8 3.3

2.8 2.6

2.6 2.8

3.0 2.8

2.6 2.5

2.6 2.2

2.5 2.5

2.4 2.4

2.5 1.9

2.3 2.3

2.2 2.2

2.4 2.0

2.3 2.3

2.3 2.3

2.5 2.3

2.6 2.5

2.4 2.4

2.5 2.8

3.1 2.8

2.6 2.5

2.5 3.8

3.8 3.3

2.8 2.5

2.5 4.9

4.7 3.7

3.0 2.6

2.5 5.8

5.2 3.9

3.1 2.6

2.4 5.1

4.8 3.7

2.9 2.5

2.3 3.9

3.9 3.3

2.6 2.3

2.2 2.9

3.1 2.8

2.4 2.2

2.1 2.3

2.5 2.4

2.2 2.1

2.1 2.0

2.3 2.2

2.1 2.1

2.1 1.9

2.2 2.2

2.2 2.1

2.2 2.1

2.4 2.4

2.3 2.2

2.3 2.6

2.8 2.7

2.5 2.4

2.4 3.4

3.6 3.1

2.7 2.5

2.5 4.6

4.5 3.6

2.9 2.5

2.5 5.7

5.1 3.9

3.2 2.7

2.6 5.5

5.0 3.8

3.1 2.7

2.6 4.3

4.3 3.5

2.8 2.5

2.5 3.2

3.4 3.0

2.6 2.4

2.3 2.4

2.7 2.5

2.3 2.2

2.2 2.0

2.3 2.2

2.1 2.0

2.0 1.8

2.1 2.1

1.9 1.8

1.8 2.0

2.2 2.1

1.9 1.8

1.7 2.3

2.5 2.3

2.1 1.8

1.7 3.1

3.2 2.7

2.3 1.9

1.7 4.1

4.1 3.2

2.5 2.0

1.8 5.3

4.9 3.6

2.8 2.2

1.9 5.6

5.0 3.7

2.9 2.3

2.0 4.6

4.5 3.5

2.7 2.3

2.1 3.5

3.5 3.1

2.5 2.2

2.2 2.6

2.8 2.6

2.4 2.3

2.2 2.2

2.4 2.4

2.3 2.3

2.3 1.9

2.3 2.3

2.3 2.3

2.4 2.0

2.3 2.3

2.3 2.3

2.5 2.3

2.6 2.5

2.5 2.4

2.6 2.9

3.1 2.9

2.7 2.5

2.7 3.9

4.0 3.4

2.9 2.7

2.9 5.1

4.9 3.9

3.2 2.9

3.0 5.3

4.1 3.4

3.0 2.9

5.0 4.8

3.8 3.1

2.8 2.8

3.7 3.8

3.3 2.7

2.5 2.6
W2
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
S3
W4
W4
W4 W4 W4 W4 W4
W4
W4
W4
S1 S1
W4
S2
S2
S2 S2
S3
S3
W2 W2 W2 W2 W2 W2
S3

0.7 Luminaire Locations
Label MH
S1 30.00
S2 30.00
S3 30.00
W2 30.00
W4 30.00
S3 30.00
S3-1 30.00
S3-2 30.00
Schedule
Symbol Label Image Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number Description Number Lamps
Lumens
Per Lamp
Light Loss
Factor Wattage
S1
2 Lithonia Lighting RSX4 LED P5 40K R4 RSX Area Luminaire Size 4 P5 Lumen Package 4000K CCT Type R4 Distribution
1 62594 0.9 483.4963
S2
4 Lithonia Lighting RSX4 LED P5 40K R5 RSX Area Luminaire Size 4 P5 Lumen Package 4000K CCT Type R5 Distribution
1 63291 0.9 483.4963
S3
9 Lithonia Lighting RSX4 LED P5 40K R5 RSX Area Luminaire Size 4 P5 Lumen Package 4000K CCT Type R5 Distribution
1 63291 0.9 966.9926
W2
7 Lithonia Lighting WDGE4 LED P6 70CRI
RFT 40K
WDGE4 LED WITH P6 - PERFORMANCE
PACKAGE, 4000K, 70CRI, FORWARD

THROW OPTIC
1 25586 0.9 185.23
W4
11 Lithonia Lighting RSX4 LED P5 40K R4 RSX Area Luminaire Size 4 P5 Lumen Package 4000K CCT Type R4 Distribution
1 62594 0.9 483.4963
Statistics
Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
DOCK AREA 2.9 fc 5.9 fc 1.2 fc 4.9:1 2.4:1
EAST DRIVE / PARKING 3.0 fc 12.3 fc 1.2 fc 10.3:1 2.5:1 SOUTH DRIVE / PARKING 3.6 fc 12.6 fc 1.1 fc 11.5:1 3.3:1 WEST DRIVE / PARKING 3.1 fc 10.7 fc 1.3 fc 8.2:1 2.4:1
NORTH TRUCK YARD 3.6 fc 8.9 fc 0.7 fc 12.7:1 5.1:1

3.2 4.0

5.4 7.2

2.8 3.4

4.4 5.4

2.7 3.2

3.9 4.4

3.0 3.4

3.6 2.6

2.7 2.8

2.8 2.5

2.4 2.3

2.2 2.5

2.2 2.1

1.8 2.5

2.2 1.9

1.5 2.5

2.2 1.8

1.4 2.9

2.4 1.7

1.2 2.5

1.7 1.2

2.4 1.6

1.1 11.8

2.4 1.6

1.1 8.9

7.0 4.9

3.6 3.1

2.4 1.6

1.1 6.5

5.3 4.0

3.1 2.7

2.3 1.6

1.1 4.9

4.3 3.5

2.8 2.3

2.0 1.6

1.1 3.7

3.5 2.1

1.8 1.5

1.2 2.7

1.6 1.4

1.2 1.6

1.4 1.3

1.2 1.5

1.4 1.5

1.5 1.6

1.6 1.8

1.8 1.8

2.1 2.3

2.5 2.2

2.7 3.1

3.4 2.5

3.0 3.7

4.3 3.3

4.3 5.4

3.2 3.9

5.5 7.3

3.7 4.6

7.0 9.8

3.9 4.9

7.8 11.7

3.7 4.7

7.1 10.0

3.2 4.0

5.6 7.4

3.4 4.4

5.5 2.5

3.1 3.8

4.4 2.2

2.7 3.1

3.5 1.8

2.1 2.4

2.6 1.4

1.6 1.9

2.0 1.2

1.4 1.6

1.8 1.3

1.5 1.7

1.8 1.7

1.9 2.1

2.2 2.2

2.5 2.8

2.9 2.6

3.2 3.7

4.0 3.6

4.5 5.2

3.2 4.2

5.7 6.9

3.8 5.3

7.6 9.5

4.2 6.2

9.7 12.3

4.2 6.2

9.7 12.4

3.8 5.3

7.7 9.6

3.2 4.3

5.7 6.9

2.9 3.6

4.5 5.2

2.7 3.2

3.7 4.0

2.2 2.6

2.9 3.0

2.0 2.2

2.3 1.4

1.6 1.8

1.9 1.3

1.5 1.7

1.9 1.6

1.8 2.1

2.2 1.9

2.3 2.6

2.9 2.3

2.8 3.3

3.7 2.5

3.1 3.9

4.6 2.8

3.5 4.6

5.9 3.3

4.1 5.9

8.0 3.8

4.7 7.4

10.7 3.8

4.8 7.7

11.4 4.4

6.6 9.0

5.9 7.9

5.3 6.8

4.7 5.8

2.3 2.4

2.7 2.9

3.1 3.2

3.2 3.2

3.2 3.2

3.0 2.8

2.6 2.3

2.0 2.0

2.0 1.9

1.8 1.7

1.4 1.2

2.4 2.6

2.8 3.1

3.3 3.5

3.6 3.6

3.6 3.4

3.2 3.0

2.7 2.4

2.1 1.8

1.8 1.8

1.7 1.6

1.4 1.1

2.5 2.7

3.0 3.3

3.6 3.9

4.0 4.1

4.0 3.8

3.6 3.3

2.9 2.6

2.2 1.9

1.9 1.8

1.7 1.6

1.4 1.2

2.7 2.9

3.3 3.6

3.9 4.2

4.4 4.5

4.4 4.2

3.9 3.5

3.2 2.8

2.4 2.0

2.0 2.0

1.9 1.8

1.5 1.3

2.9 3.2

3.5 3.9

4.4 4.8

5.1 5.2

5.1 4.8

4.3 3.9

3.5 3.1

2.6 2.5

2.4 2.4

2.3 2.1

1.8 1.6

3.0 3.4

3.8 4.3

5.0 5.8

6.2 6.3

6.2 5.7

5.0 4.3

3.8 3.3

2.9 3.1

3.1 2.9

2.7 2.5

2.2 1.8

3.2 3.7

4.1 4.7

5.7 6.6

6.9 6.9

6.9 6.5

5.7 4.7

4.0 3.6

3.1 3.7

3.6 3.5

3.2 2.9

2.6 2.2

3.2 3.8

4.2 5.0

6.2 6.9

7.1 7.2

7.0 6.9

6.2 5.0

4.2 3.8

3.3 4.2

4.2 4.0

3.7 3.3

2.9 2.5

3.2 3.8

4.2 5.0

6.1 6.9

5.5 7.5

5.5 6.9

6.1 5.0

4.2 3.8

3.3 5.3

5.3 4.9

4.4 3.8

3.3 2.8

3.2 3.8

4.2 5.0

6.1 6.9

7.0 7.1

7.0 6.8

6.1 5.0

4.3 3.9

3.4 6.3

6.3 6.0

5.3 4.3

3.6 3.1

3.1 3.6

4.0 4.6

5.6 6.5

6.8 6.8

6.8 6.4

5.6 4.7

4.1 3.7

3.3 6.8

6.8 6.6

6.0 4.9

4.0 3.4

3.0 3.4

3.8 4.2

4.9 5.6

6.1 6.1

6.0 5.6

4.9 4.3

3.8 3.5

3.1 7.1

7.0 6.9

6.3 5.2

4.1 2.8

3.2 3.5

3.9 4.3

4.7 5.0

5.1 5.0

4.7 4.3

3.9 3.6

3.3 2.9

7.2 7.1

6.9 6.4

5.3 4.1

2.7 2.9

3.2 3.5

3.9 4.2

4.3 4.4

4.3 4.2

3.9 3.6

3.3 3.1

2.8 6.9

6.8 6.7

6.1 5.0

4.0 2.5

2.7 3.0

3.3 3.6

3.8 4.0

4.0 4.0

3.8 3.6

3.4 3.1

2.8 2.6

6.4 6.4

6.2 5.4

4.4 3.7

2.3 2.5

2.8 3.0

3.3 3.4

3.5 3.5

3.5 3.5

3.3 3.1

2.9 2.7

2.5 5.5

5.5 5.1

4.5 3.9

3.4 2.2

2.4 2.7

2.9 3.1

3.2 3.3

3.2 3.3

3.3 3.1

3.0 2.8

2.5 2.4

4.4 4.4

4.1 3.8

3.4 3.0

2.2 2.4

2.7 2.9

3.2 3.3

3.4 3.4

3.4 3.3

3.2 3.0

2.8 2.5

2.3 3.8

3.7 3.6

3.3 3.0

2.6 2.3

2.6 2.8

3.1 3.4

3.6 3.8

3.8 3.8

3.7 3.5

3.2 3.0

2.6 2.4

3.2 3.2

3.0 2.8

2.6 2.3

2.5 2.7

3.0 3.4

3.7 4.0

4.2 4.3

4.2 4.1

3.8 3.5

3.1 2.8

2.5 2.6

2.5 2.5

2.3 2.2

1.9 2.6

3.0 3.3

3.6 4.0

4.3 4.6

4.7 4.7

4.5 4.1

3.8 3.4

3.0 2.6

2.1 2.1

2.0 2.0

1.8 1.6

2.8 3.1

3.5 3.9

4.4 5.0

5.4 5.6

5.6 5.2

4.7 4.1

3.6 3.2

2.8 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.8 1.6

1.4 2.9

3.3 3.8

4.2 5.0

5.9 6.5

6.5 6.5

6.2 5.4

4.5 3.9

3.4 2.9

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.7

1.6 1.4

3.0 3.5

4.0 4.5

5.5 6.5

6.9 7.0

7.0 6.8

6.1 5.0

4.2 3.7

3.1 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.8 1.7

1.5 3.0

3.6 4.1

4.7 5.9

6.7 7.0

7.3 7.1

7.0 6.4

5.3 4.3

3.8 3.2

2.2 2.2

2.2 2.1

1.9 1.7

3.0 3.6

4.0 4.7

5.8 6.7

7.0 7.3

7.1 7.0

6.4 5.3

4.3 3.8

3.2 2.8

2.8 2.7

2.5 2.3

2.1 3.0

3.5 3.9

4.5 5.5

6.5 6.9

6.9 6.9

6.8 6.1

5.0 4.2

3.8 3.3

3.4 3.4

3.3 3.0

2.8 2.4

2.8 3.3

3.7 4.1

4.9 5.8

6.4 6.5

6.5 6.2

5.4 4.6

4.0 3.6

3.2 4.0

3.9 3.8

3.5 3.2

2.8 2.7

3.0 3.4

3.8 4.2

4.8 5.3

5.5 5.5

5.1 4.6

4.1 3.7

3.3 3.0

4.8 4.8

4.5 4.1

3.6 3.2

2.5 2.8

3.1 3.4

3.7 4.1

4.3 4.4

4.4 4.2

3.9 3.6

3.3 3.1

2.9 6.0

6.0 5.6

4.9 4.1

3.5 2.2

2.5 2.7

3.0 3.3

3.5 3.7

3.8 3.8

3.6 3.5

3.2 3.0

2.8 2.6

6.7 6.7

6.5 5.8

4.7 3.8

2.0 2.2

2.4 2.6

2.9 3.0

3.2 3.2

3.2 3.1

3.0 2.8

2.6 2.5

2.3 7.0

6.9 6.8

6.3 5.1

4.1 1.8

1.9 2.1

2.3 2.4

2.5 2.6

2.6 2.6

2.6 2.5

2.4 2.2

2.1 2.0

5.5 6.3

6.8 6.2

5.1 4.0

1.7 1.7

1.8 2.0

2.1 2.1

2.2 2.1

2.2 2.2

2.1 2.1

2.0 1.9

1.9 7.0

6.9 6.8

6.2 5.1

4.1 1.6

1.6 1.7

1.8 1.9

2.0 2.0

1.9 2.0

2.0 2.0

1.9 1.9

1.8 1.8

6.7 6.7

6.4 5.7

4.6 3.8

1.6 1.6

1.7 1.8

1.9 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.9 2.0

2.0 1.9

1.8 1.8

1.8 5.9

5.9 5.6

4.8 4.1

3.5 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.9 2.0

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.1

2.0 1.9

1.8 1.8

4.8 4.7

4.5 4.0

3.6 3.1

1.8 1.8

2.0 2.1

2.3 2.4

2.5 2.5

2.5 2.5

2.4 2.3

2.2 2.0

1.9 4.0

3.9 3.7

3.5 3.1

2.8 2.0

2.1 2.3

2.6 2.8

3.0 3.1

3.1 3.1

3.0 2.9

2.7 2.5

2.3 2.1

3.4 3.4

3.2 3.0

2.7 2.4

2.3 2.5

2.7 3.0

3.3 3.5

3.7 3.8

3.8 3.6

3.4 3.2

2.9 2.6

2.3 2.7

2.7 2.6

2.5 2.2

2.0 2.5

2.8 3.1

3.4 3.8

4.1 4.3

4.4 4.4

4.2 4.0

3.6 3.3

2.9 2.6

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.0

1.8 1.6

2.8 3.1

3.5 3.9

4.4 4.9

5.3 5.5

5.4 5.1

4.6 4.2

3.7 3.3

2.8 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.7 1.5

1.3 3.0

3.5 3.9

4.4 5.1

6.0 6.6

6.7 6.7

6.4 5.6

4.8 4.2

3.7 3.1

2.6 2.2

1.9 1.8

1.7 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.6 1.6

1.6 1.5

1.5 1.3

1.2 3.2

3.8 4.3

5.0 6.0

7.0 7.5

7.6 7.6

7.4 6.6

5.5 4.7

4.1 3.4

2.8 2.3

2.0 1.8

1.7 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.6 1.6

1.5 1.5

1.4 1.3

1.1 3.4

4.1 4.7

5.4 6.7

7.6 8.0

8.2 8.1

8.0 7.4

6.2 5.1

4.5 3.7

3.0 2.4

2.1 1.9

1.8 1.8

1.8 1.7

1.7 1.7

1.6 1.6

1.5 1.3

1.2 3.5

4.2 4.8

5.6 6.9

8.0 7.6

6.9 8.4

7.7 6.5

5.3 4.6

3.9 3.1

2.5 2.2

2.0 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.9 1.8

1.8 1.6

1.4 1.3

3.6 4.3

4.9 5.7

7.0 8.1

8.6 8.7

8.8 8.6

7.9 6.6

5.6 4.9

4.1 3.3

2.8 2.4

2.3 2.1

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.2

2.1 2.0

1.9 1.8

1.6 1.4

3.6 4.2

4.9 5.6

6.6 7.8

8.5 8.7

8.8 8.5

7.6 6.4

5.5 4.9

4.2 3.5

2.9 2.6

2.4 2.3

2.3 2.3

2.4 2.4

2.4 2.3

2.2 1.9

1.7 1.5

3.5 4.1

4.7 5.4

6.2 7.1

8.1 8.5

8.5 8.1

7.2 6.2

5.4 4.8

4.1 3.5

3.0 2.7

2.6 2.5

2.5 2.7

2.9 3.0

2.9 2.8

2.5 2.2

1.9 1.6

3.3 3.9

4.5 5.1

5.8 6.6

7.4 7.8

7.8 7.5

7.0 6.1

5.3 4.7

4.1 3.5

3.0 2.8

2.7 2.6

2.7 3.0

3.3 3.4

3.3 3.3

3.0 2.5

2.1 1.8

3.5 3.3

2.8 2.2

1.9 3.4

3.0 2.3

1.9 3.0

2.3 1.9

3.3 2.8

2.2 1.9

2.9 2.5

2.1 1.8

2.5 2.2

1.9 1.6

2.2 2.0

1.8 1.5

2.0 1.9

1.7 1.4

1.9 1.8

1.6 1.4

1.8 1.7

1.5 1.3

1.9 1.7

1.6 1.3

2.0 1.8

1.6 1.4

2.1 2.0

1.7 1.5

2.4 2.1

1.9 1.6

2.8 2.4

2.0 1.7

3.2 2.7

2.2 1.8

3.3 2.9

2.3 1.9

3.3 2.8

2.2 1.8

3.4 3.3

2.8 2.2

1.9 3.3

3.1 2.5

2.1 1.7

2.9 2.6

2.2 1.9

1.6 2.3

2.1 1.9

1.6 1.4

1.9 1.8

1.6 1.4

1.2 1.0

1.0 0.9

4.4 5.1

5.8 6.2

6.3 6.3

6.1 5.7

5.1 3.7

3.2 2.8

2.6 2.5

2.6 2.7

3.1 3.5

3.7 4.4

5.1 5.4

5.5 5.5

5.4 5.1

4.5 3.4

3.0 2.6

2.5 2.5

2.5 2.6

3.0 3.4

2.3 2.8

3.3 3.7

4.3 4.7

4.8 4.9

4.8 4.4

3.8 3.4

3.0 2.7

2.4 2.3

2.3 2.4

2.5 2.7

3.1 3.4

3.4 2.1

2.5 2.9

3.2 3.6

3.9 4.1

4.1 4.0

3.7 3.3

3.0 2.7

2.4 2.2

2.1 2.1

2.2 2.3

2.4 2.7

2.9 3.0

1.9 2.3

2.6 2.9

3.1 3.3

3.1 3.4

3.2 2.9

2.4 2.2

2.0 1.9

2.0 2.0

2.1 2.2

2.4 2.5

2.5 1.8

2.1 2.4

2.7 2.9

3.1 3.0

2.8 2.6

2.1 2.0

1.8 1.8

1.8 2.0

2.1 2.2

2.3 2.3

1.8 2.1

2.4 2.6

2.7 2.9

2.7 2.8

2.6 2.4

1.9 1.8

1.6 1.6

1.6 1.7

1.8 1.9

2.0 2.1

2.1 1.8

2.1 2.3

2.6 2.7

2.7 2.7

2.6 2.4

2.2 1.8

1.6 1.5

1.5 1.5

1.6 1.7

1.8 1.9

1.9 1.9

1.8 2.1

2.4 2.6

2.7 2.7

2.6 2.5

2.4 2.3

2.1 1.9

1.7 1.5

1.4 1.4

1.5 1.6

1.7 1.8

1.9 1.9

2.0 1.9

2.1 2.4

2.6 2.8

2.8 2.7

2.5 2.4

2.2 2.0

1.8 1.6

1.5 1.4

1.4 1.5

1.6 1.8

1.9 2.0

2.4 2.5

2.8 3.1

3.2 3.2

3.0 2.7

2.5 2.2

2.0 1.8

1.6 1.5

1.4 1.5

1.6 1.7

1.8 2.0

2.1 2.2

2.3 8.0

8.5 3.2

3.5 3.6

3.5 3.1

2.6 2.3

2.1 1.6

1.5 1.4

1.5 1.6

1.8 1.9

2.1 2.3

2.4 2.5

6.7 7.2

4.4 5.7

7.8 10.5

10.2 7.5

5.6 4.5

3.6 2.8

2.5 2.5

2.8 3.6

4.5 5.6

7.5 10.3

10.6 7.8

5.8 4.6

3.5 3.7

3.7 3.6

3.3 2.8

2.4 2.1

1.6 1.4

1.4 1.5

1.7 1.9

2.0 2.3

2.6 2.9

3.0 5.5

5.8 3.8

4.6 5.9

7.7 8.6

7.5 5.8

4.6 3.9

3.3 2.6

2.3 2.3

2.6 3.3

3.9 4.6

5.8 7.6

8.6 7.7

6.0 4.7

4.0 3.4

2.8 2.4

2.4 2.7

3.4 4.0

4.7 6.0

7.8 8.7

7.8 6.1

4.9 4.3

3.8 3.3

3.0 2.8

2.7 3.1

3.5 3.7

3.8 3.4

2.9 2.4

2.1 1.6

1.4 1.4

1.5 1.7

2.2 2.5

3.0 3.3

3.4 5.0

5.3 5.0

4.1 3.5

3.2 2.9

2.3 2.0

2.0 2.3

2.9 3.2

3.5 4.2

5.0 5.3

5.0 4.2

3.6 3.3

2.9 2.4

2.1 2.1

2.4 2.9

3.3 3.6

4.3 5.1

5.4 5.1

4.4 3.9

3.7 3.4

3.1 2.8

2.6 2.6

3.0 3.4

3.6 3.7

3.3 2.8

2.3 2.0

1.5 1.3

1.3 1.5

1.8 2.3

2.8 3.3

3.5 3.5

4.0 3.8

3.2 2.8

2.6 2.3

2.0 1.8

1.8 2.4

2.6 2.8

3.2 3.8

4.0 3.8

3.3 2.8

2.4 2.1

1.9 1.9

2.1 2.4

2.6 2.8

3.3 3.9

4.1 4.0

3.5 3.2

3.1 3.0

2.8 2.6

2.4 2.4

2.7 3.2

3.4 3.5

3.5 3.4

3.1 2.6

2.2 1.9

1.7 1.4

1.3 1.3

1.5 1.8

2.0 2.3

2.9 3.3

2.7 3.7

2.2 2.0

1.7 1.6

1.6 2.0

2.2 2.5

2.8 3.1

3.2 3.1

2.9 2.5

2.0 1.8

1.7 1.7

1.8 2.0

2.2 2.5

2.9 3.3

3.3 3.1

2.8 2.6

2.6 2.5

2.3 2.3

2.4 2.8

3.1 3.2

3.2 3.1

2.7 2.3

2.0 1.8

1.6 1.4

1.3 1.3

1.5 1.8

2.0 2.3

2.8 3.3

3.5 3.5

2.2 2.3

2.4 2.4

2.3 2.2

2.1 2.1

2.0 2.1

2.3 2.5

2.7 2.6

2.5 2.2

2.0 1.8

1.6 1.4

1.3 1.2

1.3 1.4

1.7 1.9

2.1 2.6

3.1 3.3

3.4 1.8

1.9 2.0

2.1 1.6

1.7 1.7

1.8 1.3

1.4 1.4

1.4 5.9

12.3 12.3

8.9 3.0

3.2 2.9

2.5 2.2

2.2 4.1

4.1 3.4

2.7 2.4

2.3 5.2

4.9 3.8

3.0 2.6

2.4 5.8

5.2 3.9

3.2 2.7

2.6 4.8

4.7 3.7

3.0 2.7

2.6 3.7

3.8 3.3

2.8 2.6

2.6 2.8

3.0 2.8

2.6 2.5

2.6 2.2

2.5 2.5

2.4 2.4

2.5 1.9

2.3 2.3

2.2 2.2

2.4 2.0

2.3 2.3

2.3 2.3

2.5 2.3

2.6 2.5

2.4 2.4

2.5 2.8

3.1 2.8

2.6 2.5

2.5 3.8

3.8 3.3

2.8 2.5

2.5 4.9

4.7 3.7

3.0 2.6

2.5 5.8

5.2 3.9

3.1 2.6

2.4 5.1

4.8 3.7

2.9 2.5

2.3 3.9

3.9 3.3

2.6 2.3

2.2 2.9

3.1 2.8

2.4 2.2

2.1 2.3

2.5 2.4

2.2 2.1

2.1 2.0

2.3 2.2

2.1 2.1

2.1 1.9

2.2 2.2

2.2 2.1

2.2 2.1

2.4 2.4

2.3 2.2

2.3 2.6

2.8 2.7

2.5 2.4

2.4 3.4

3.6 3.1

2.7 2.5

2.5 4.6

4.5 3.6

2.9 2.5

2.5 5.7

5.1 3.9

3.2 2.7

2.6 5.5

5.0 3.8

3.1 2.7

2.6 4.3

4.3 3.5

2.8 2.5

2.5 3.2

3.4 3.0

2.6 2.4

2.3 2.4

2.7 2.5

2.3 2.2

2.2 2.0

2.3 2.2

2.1 2.0

2.0 1.8

2.1 2.1

1.9 1.8

1.8 2.0

2.2 2.1

1.9 1.8

1.7 2.3

2.5 2.3

2.1 1.8

1.7 3.1

3.2 2.7

2.3 1.9

1.7 4.1

4.1 3.2

2.5 2.0

1.8 5.3

4.9 3.6

2.8 2.2

1.9 5.6

5.0 3.7

2.9 2.3

2.0 4.6

4.5 3.5

2.7 2.3

2.1 3.5

3.5 3.1

2.5 2.2

2.2 2.6

2.8 2.6

2.4 2.3

2.2 2.2

2.4 2.4

2.3 2.3

2.3 1.9

2.3 2.3

2.3 2.3

2.4 2.0

2.3 2.3

2.3 2.3

2.5 2.3

2.6 2.5

2.5 2.4

2.6 2.9

3.1 2.9

2.7 2.5

2.7 3.9

4.0 3.4

2.9 2.7

2.9 5.1

4.9 3.9

3.2 2.9

3.0 5.3

4.1 3.4

3.0 2.9

5.0 4.8

3.8 3.1

2.8 2.8

3.7 3.8

3.3 2.7

2.5 2.6
S3
S3
S3
S3
W4 W4 W4
W4
W4
S1
W4
S2
S2
S2 S2
W2 W2 W2 W2 W2
S3

0.7 TITLE: PROJECT:

REVISIONS BY
SHEET
JOB
NO.

SCALE
DATE

CHECKED
DRAWN
STAMP
H IT SM D C. RAH IC R
No. E14303
Exp. 6-30-23
ELECTR I CAL REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER E OF CALIFORNIA STAT HCS Engineering 50 years 4512 Feather River Dr #F, Stockton, CA 95219 209-478-8270 | www.hcs-eng.com inc.

RCS
RCS
path://john/17/4
As indicated
11/1/2022 5:13:11 PM
C:\Users\RichardSmith\Box\2022\0-100\2022.098 NORTHSTAIR AIRPORT\Airport photometric.rvt E1
2017.xxx PHOTOMETRIC STUDY FOR: AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH SOUTH AIRPORT WAY @ TECHNICAL, MANTECA, CA

PHOTOMETRIC STUDY
SCALE: 1/64" = 1'-0"
1 PHOTOMETRIC STUDY
Exhibit "B"

AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTRE NORTH PROJECT INITIAL STUDY
PAGE 147
APPENDIX F: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
1 Airport Business Centre North Project

LIST OF COMMENTERS
Table 1 lists the comments on the Draft IS/MND that were submitted to the City of Manteca (City) during the public review period for the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. CEQA statutes do not require a formal response to comment for an Initial Study, however, the City has chosen to provide formal responses to all comment letters for informational purposes. The assigned comment letter or number, letter date, letter author, and affiliation, if presented in the comment letter or if representing a public agency, are also listed. Letters received are coded with letters (A, B, etc.).

TABLE 1 LIST OF COMMENTERS ON DRAFT IS/MND

RESPONSE
LETTER

INDIVIDUAL OR SIGNATORY AFFILIATION DATE
A Nicholas Fung California Department of Transportation 10-31-22 B Adam Salcido Unknown 11-2-22
C Gary Ho Blum Collins & Ho, LLP 11-2-22
D Peter Minkel Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board 11-3-22

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
The lead agency is evaluating and responding to all comments on the that regard an environmental issue.

The written response addresses the environmental issue raised and provides a detailed response. The written response is a good faith and reasoned analysis. It is noted that lead agencies need only to respond to significant environmental issues associated with the proposed Project and do not need to provide all the information requested by the commenter, as long as a good faith effort at full disclosure.

RESPONSES TO COMMENT LETTERS
Written comments on the CEQA document are reproduced on the following pages, along with responses to those comments. To assist in referencing comments and responses, the following coding system is used:
• Each letter is lettered or numbered (i.e., Letter A) and each comment within each letter is numbered (i.e., comment A-1, comment A-2).

Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
2 Airport Business Centre North Project
c
A-1
A-2
A-3
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
A-9
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
4 Airport Business Centre North Project
A-9 Cont’d
A-10
A-11
A-12
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 5
Response to Letter A: California Department of Transportation Response A-1: The electronic Synchro analysis files were submitted to Caltrans for their use in reviewing the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (ISMND) for the Airport Business Centre North Project dated October 4, 2022.

Response A-2: The Traffic Impact Study for the Airport Business Centre North Project was included in Appendix B of the ISMND.

Response A-3: The Airport Business Centre North Project is an ISMND and not an EIR. The Traffic Impact Study includes the requirements of analyzing trip generation analysis (cars and trucks), vehicle miles traveled analysis (employee home based work trips), roadway segment analysis (average daily traffic) and intersection level of service (am and pm peak hour) analysis.

Response A-4: The I-5 / Roth Road and I-5 / Lathrop Road interchanges are included in the traffic analysis as shown in Tables 6 (Existing) and 7 (Existing Plus Project) for roadway segment analysis and Tables 8 (Cumulative No Project) and 9 (Cumulative With Project) for intersection level of service analysis.

Response A-5: Under Existing Conditions, neither the I-5 / Roth Road or I-5 / Lathrop Road interchanges operate below acceptable level of service conditions. Under Cumulative No Project Conditions, planned improvements have been identified and fees being collected to improve the I-5 / Roth Road and I-5 / Lathrop Road interchanges to serve projected growth in population and employment in the City of Lathrop, City of Manteca, Unincorporated San Joaquin County, and City of Stockton. The Airport Business Centre North Project does not result in operational impacts to either the I-5 / Roth Road and I-5 / Lathrop Road interchanges. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required under Existing Plus Project Conditions or Cumulative Plus Project Conditions beyond paying their Regional SJCOG and Local City of Manteca Traffic Impact Fees at the time when building permits are required.

Response A-6: The Airport Business Centre North Project does not result in impacts to either the I-5 / Roth Road and I-5 / Lathrop Road interchanges. Therefore, figures showing 95th Percentile queue lengths were not prepared.

Response A-7: The Airport Business Centre North Project does not result in operational impacts to either the I-5 / Roth Road and I-5 / Lathrop Road interchanges. Therefore, SimTraffic analysis and figures showing 95th Percentile queue lengths were not prepared.

Response A-8: An STAA truck terminal access application is being required as part of the Airport Business Centre North Project. This would require all STAA trucks to use the Intermodal Way / Roth Road intersection to and from the Interstate 5 / Roth Road interchange. As part of this application, the STAA truck turning analysis will be submitted to the City of Manteca and Caltrans.

Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
6 Airport Business Centre North Project
Response A-9: Airport Business Centre North Project STAA trucks would not be allowed to use the I-5 / Lathrop Road interchange or the SR 99 / Lathrop Road interchange.

Response A-10: The Airport Business Centre North Project does not result in impacts to either the I-5 / Roth Road interchange, I-5 / Lathrop Road interchange, or Interstate 5 mainline.

Response A-11: The commentors statement regarding establishment of programs and methods to reduce VMT and support appropriate bicycle, pedestrian and transit infrastructure have been considered in the development of the City of Manteca Active Transportation Plan and General Plan Update Policies.

Response A-12:In addition to the eight bicycle parking spaces, the Airport Business Centre North Project includes bike lockers and employee facilities to encourage the use of alternative transportation (bicycling and walking).

B-1
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 7
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
8 Airport Business Centre North Project
Response to Letter B: Adam Salcido
Response B-1: This commenter requests that notice be sent to several email recipients pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.2. This comment is noted.

Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 9
C-1
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
10 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-2
C-3
C-4
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 11
C-4
(Continued)
C-5
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
12 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-5
(Continued)
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 13
C-5
(Continued)
C-6
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
14 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-6
(Continued)
C-7
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 15
C-8
C-7
(Continued)
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
16 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-8
(Continued)
C-9
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 17
C-9
(Continued)
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
18 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-9
(Continued)
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 19
C-9
(Continued)
C-10
C-11
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
20 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 21
C-12
C-13
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
22 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-13
(Continued)
C-14
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 23
C-14
(Continued)
C-15
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
24 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-15
(Continued)
C-16
C-17
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 25
C-17
(Continued)
C-18
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
26 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-18
(Continued)
C-19
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 27
C-19
(Continued)
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
28 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-19
(Continued)
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 29
C-19
(Continued
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
30 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-19
(Continued)
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 31
C-19
(Continued)
C-20
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
32 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-20
(Continued)
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 33
C-20
(Continued)
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
34 Airport Business Centre North Project
C-20
(Continued)
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 35
C-20
(Continued)
C-21
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
36 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 37
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
38 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 39
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
40 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 41
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
42 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 43
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
44 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 45
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
46 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 47
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
48 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 49
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
50 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 51
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
52 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 53
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
54 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 55
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
56 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 57
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
58 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 59
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
60 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 61
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
62 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 63
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
64 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 65
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
66 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 67
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
68 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 69
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
70 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 71
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
72 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 73
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
74 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 75
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
76 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 77
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
78 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 79
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
80 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 81
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
82 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 83
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
84 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 85
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
86 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 87
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
88 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 89
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
90 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 91
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
92 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 93
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
94 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 95
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
96 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 97
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
98 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 99
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
100 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 101
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
102 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 103
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
104 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 105
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
106 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 107
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
108 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 109
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
110 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 111
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
112 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 113
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
114 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 115
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
116 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 117
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
118 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 119
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
120 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 121
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
122 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 123
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
124 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 125
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
126 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 127
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
128 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 129
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
130 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 131
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
132 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 133
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
134 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 135
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
136 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 137
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
138 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 139
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
140 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 141
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
142 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 143
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
144 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 145
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
146 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 147
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
148 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 149
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
150 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 151
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
152 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 153
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
154 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 155
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
156 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 157
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
158 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 159
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
160 Airport Business Centre North Project
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 161
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
162 Airport Business Centre North Project
Response to Letter C: Gary Ho, Blum Collins & Ho, LLP
Response C-1: This comment serves as an introduction to the letter. No response is warranted.

Response C-2: The commentor states that the MND does not include a floor plan, detailed grading plan, or detailed site plan for the proposed Project. The commentor further states that the site plan provided in Figure 3: Site Plan does not provide any pertinent information such as the earthwork quantity notes, parking requirements, or floor area ratio calculations. The commentor also states that Figure 4: Project Elevations has also been edited for public review and does not provide any information, such as the materials utilized or the building heights. Additionally, the commentor states that a grading plan and floor plans have not been provided for public review. The commentor states that the MND has excluded these required application items from public review and edited them into forms that do not represent them meaningfully, which does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). The commentor claims that incorporation by reference (CEQA §15150 (f)) is not appropriate as these documents contribute directly to analysis of the problem at hand. The commentor further states that providing this information is vital as the MND does not provide any details about the onsite/offsite grading required by the proposed project. The commentor states that an EIR must be prepared to include all application items for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers.

This comment is noted. A detailed site plan is required for approval of the requested entitlements by the City of Manteca. The IS/MND is not required to include all applicable plans that are ultimately prepared, some of which are not prepared until entitlements are secured. For instance, full improvement and grading plans are engineered drawings that are prepared if entitlements are secured. The site plan included in the IS/MND is sufficient for a CEQA analysis. Meaningful disclosure is provided for the proposed Project, including within the Project Description prepared for the IS/MND. The written Project Description provides sufficient detail for the project consideration. The IS/MND adequately addressed CEQA requirements and an EIR is not required, as explained further throughout Responses C-3 through C-21, below. We have added Appendix E with a set of conceptual plans; however, it is noted that the requested grading plans are not engineered for a project unless a project’s entitlement request is approved. Engineered grading plans are not necessary to perform a CEQA review of the project. No further response to this comment is warranted.

Response C-3: This comment cites tiering criteria and argues that an EIR must be prepared because a website link to the City’s website does not provide public access to the Addendum to the Northwest Airport Master Plan EIR.

The City’s “Planning Documents” site, which was referenced in the Initial Study, provides a pdf copy of the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan, Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Draft EIR, and Northwest Airport Way Master Plan Final EIR. These are the original CEQA documents that were prepared and certified for the Master Plan area. Subsequent Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 163
to the certification of the EIR, several projects within the Master Plan area have been designed for development, and with those projects a CEQA analysis was performed. This includes the Airport Business Center IS/MND, CenterPoint South IS/MND, Intermodal Way Extension IS/MND, GBx Manteca IS/MND, and an EIR Addendum for CenterPoint Container Yard 2. All these documents are available at the City of Manteca, whom holds these records as part of the official approval of these individual projects. The EIR Addendum in question can also be found on the City’s website at the following link:
https://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/CommunityDevelopment/Planning%20Division/Planning CommissionDocuments/2019%20Planning%20Commission%20Agendas/05%20- %20May%2028,%202019%20Meeting%20Agenda/Item%206.1%20%20CenterPoint%20 Container%20Yard%202,%20SPC-17-38%20and%20SPC-17-
40/Item%206.1%20%20Attachment%205.pdf
All documents in question are available both electronically on the City’s website, and in person at the City’s Planning Department.

Response C-4: This comment suggests that the MND severely misrepresents the proposed Project and under-represents the proposed Project’s significant impacts. The comment argues that a new EIR is warranted based on new information being produced since the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan EIR was certified. The commenter specifically identifies the enactment of SB 743 and a requirement for a VMT analysis.

The commenter fundamentally misunderstands tiering and how tiering has been appropriately conducted under the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan EIR and subsequent CEQA documents for individual projects under the Master Plan. Page 4 of the Final Initial Study presents a background discussion of past Master Plan approvals, and EIR tiering. The following excerpt is from page 4 of the Initial Study:

Tiering
According to CEQA Guidelines section 15168, subdivision (c)(5), “[a] program EIR will be most helpful in dealing with later activities if it provides a description of planned activities that would implement the program and deals with the effects of the program as specifically and comprehensively as possible.” Later environmental documents (EIRs, mitigated negative declarations, or negative declarations) can incorporate by reference materials from the program EIR regarding regional influences, secondary impacts, cumulative impacts, broad alternatives, and other factors (CEQA Guidelines Section 15168[d][2]). These later documents need only focus on new impacts that have not been considered before (CEQA Guidelines Section 15168[d][3]).

Section 15168(c), entitled “Use with Later Activities,” provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

Later activities in the program must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared:

1. If a later activity would have effects that were not examined in the program EIR, a new Initial Study would need to be prepared leading to either an EIR or a Negative Declaration.

That later analysis may tier from the program EIR as provided in Section 15152.

Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
164 Airport Business Centre North Project

2. If the agency finds that pursuant to Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required, the agency can approve the activities as being within the scope of the project covered by the program EIR, and no new environmental document would be required. Whether a later activity is within the scope of a program EIR is a factual question that the lead agency determines based on substantial evidence in the record. Factors that an agency may consider in making that determination include, but are not limited to, consistency of the later activity with the type of allowable land use, overall planned density and building intensity, geographic area analyzed for environmental impacts, and covered infrastructure, as described in the program EIR.

3. An agency shall incorporate feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed in the program EIR into later activities in the program.

4. Where the later activities involve site specific operations, the agency should use a written checklist or similar device to document the evaluation of the site and the activity to determine whether the environmental effects of the operation were within the scope of the program EIR.

Generally, when a property owner submits applications for site-specific approvals (i.e., tentative maps, conditional use permits, or other discretionary entitlements), the City staff will review the applications for consistency with the higher tier document. This consistency review ultimately determines whether the application for site specific approval is consistent with the higher tier document, Conditions of Approval, and Mitigation Measures, and whether it is consistent with what was anticipated and analyzed in the program EIR. Often a City will conclude that most, or all, components of the site-specific application can be developed with no new analysis of environmental effects, or a focused analysis limited to the environmental effects that could not be reasonably foreseen at the time the certified EIR was prepared.

These site-specific approvals may be narrowed pursuant to the rules for tiering set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15152. “‘[T]iering is a process by which agencies can adopt programs, plans, policies, or ordinances with EIRs focusing on ‘the big picture,’ and can then use streamlined CEQA review for individual projects that are consistent with such…[first tier decisions] and are…consistent with local agencies’ governing general plans and zoning.’” (Koster v. County of San Joaquin (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 29, 36.) Section 15152 provides that, where a first-tier EIR has “adequately addressed” the subject of cumulative impacts, such impacts need not be revisited in second- and third-tier documents. Furthermore, second- and third-tier documents may limit the examination of impacts to those that “were not examined as significant effects” in the prior EIR or “[a]re susceptible to substantial reduction or avoidance by the choice of specific revisions in the project, by the imposition of conditions, or other means.” In general, significant environmental effects have been “adequately addressed” if the lead agency determines that:
a. they have been mitigated or avoided as a result of the prior environmental impact report and findings adopted in connection with that prior environmental impact report; or b. they have been examined at a sufficient level of detail in the prior environmental impact report to enable those effects to be mitigated or avoided by site specific revisions, the imposition of conditions, or by other means in connection with the approval of the later project.

Where a site-specific approval within the City warrants additional environmental review, there are several paths forward. This includes an EIR Addendum, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, or some form of Environmental Impact Report. The Mitigated Negative Declaration is a form of CEQA review that is commonly prepared for small projects built out under a Master Plan with a certified EIR.

Based on the characteristics of the proposed Project, the City of Manteca has determined it is appropriate to develop an IS/MND for the proposed Project, using the tiering concept. Therefore, this IS/MND tiers from the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan EIR and the Addendum to the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan EIR.

Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 165
The commenter is directed to page 122 through 125 of the Initial Study for a VMT analysis that was prepared in accordance with SB 743. Here, the City has responded to new statutory requirements to prepare a VMT analysis. This VMT analysis is subsequent to, and supplementary to, the certified EIR for which this project analysis is tiered. This analysis presents new information, provides an analysis, and concludes that the impact is less than significant. The commenter incorrectly presumes that the existence of “new information” guarantees the need for an EIR to be prepared, when in fact this is not what is specified in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(s). The statute provides four warrants for when a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR would be warranted for a project that has “new information.” The City responded to the statutory requirements by preparing the Initial Study for this project to determine if any of the four warrants would be met. After the analysis it was found that none of the four warrants were met. More specifically, the VMT analysis, which the commenter cites as a source of “new information” that warrants an EIR, was found by the Traffic Engineer to be a less than significant impact. The City intends to continue to comply with the SB 743 VMT analysis requirements for any project that develops within an area that already has a certified EIR, but where that EIR did not include a VMT analysis because no such analysis was required. These subsequent and supplementary VMT analyses will guide the City in determining where a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR is warranted, and were a Mitigated Negative Declaration or Exemption is warranted. Based on the analysis in the Initial Study, and all facts in the record, there are no new transportation impacts as a result of the VMT analysis.

Response C-5: This comment suggests that MND does not accurately describe the proposed Project, and suggests that the proposed Project has been piecemealed. The commenter provides a list of five known buildings and uses a term “CenterPoint Intermodal Center Manteca” to describe these projects.

As discussed under Response C-3, the commenter fundamentally misunderstands tiering and how tiering has been appropriately conducted under the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan EIR.

What the commenter has described is individual sites that have been developed within the approved Northwest Airport Master Plan. As stated throughout the Initial Study, the proposed Project is located within this Northwest Airport Master Plan, just as the five projects listed by the commenter are located in the same Master Plan area. The term “CenterPoint Intermodal Center Manteca” appears to be a marketing name that one of the property owners within the Northwest Airport Master Plan area has assigned to market their properties for sale. Property developers assigning a marketing name to properties for sale is common after City approvals are made. The City recognizes the Master Plan area under the approved Northwest Airport Master Plan, not under the marketing name.

The commenter misapplies the term "piecemealing" to the proposed Project. Instead, the Initial Study clearly articulates the Project Background, including the previously certified Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
166 Airport Business Centre North Project
program-level EIR for the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan and the CEQA “Tiering” statutes beginning on page 5. This is discussed under Response C-3.

Response C-6: This commenter provides a set of comments regarding the “Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions” analysis. The commentor refers to the attachments from SWAPE for a complete technical commentary and analysis. The commentor then states that the IS/MND does not include analysis for relevant environmental justice issues. The commentor states that this is particularly important, since the surrounding community is highly burdened by pollution. The commentor states that, according to CalEnviroScreen

4.0, CalEPA’s screening tool that ranks each census tract in the state for pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability, the proposed project’s census tract (6077005119) ranks worse than 98% of the rest of the state overall. The commentor provides additional statistics for the community’s exposure to air pollution, and states that, since the community has a high rate of linguistic isolation and low educational attainment, the community is highly vulnerable. The commentor also states that the proposed Project’s census tract is identified as an SB 535 Disadvantaged Community.

The commentor also states that CalEEMod, which was used (in part) to estimate Project energy usage, is not a State-approved energy compliance modeling software, and since the CalEEMod modeling does not comply with the California 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, the modeling is inaccurate. The commentor further states that, therefore, a finding of significance for energy impacts must be made.

It should be noted that topic of “environmental justice” or “fair treatment” is not referenced in the CEQA Guidelines and is not a required impact category. Social and economic impacts that are not related to physical impacts are not considered within an environmental analysis. The Initial Study, however, does provide an analysis of environmental topics revolving around pollution (i.e. air quality pollution, water quality pollution, etc.), that ultimately become important considerations for elected officials as they deliberate on entitlement requests and the social, economic, and environmental impacts that the entitlements would have on the community.

The IS/MND has evaluated each of the proposed Project’s environmental impacts against the relevant thresholds (such as via an air toxic health risk screening, using the Air District’s air toxic health risk screening Prioritization Calculator,1to determine the total cancer and non-cancer air toxic health risks and the nearby sensitive receptors) and checked consistency with the applicable plans (such as the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan and its associated EIR). Moreover, the IS/MND has incorporated mitigation measures where applicable and feasible, made appropriate significance determinations, and evaluated cumulative impacts. As noted earlier in this response, CEQA does not use the terms “fair treatment” or “environmental justice”. Rather, CEQA centers on whether a project may have a significant effect on the physical environment, regardless of 1 See here for further detail (under ‘Screening Tools’): https://www.valleyair.org/transportation/ceqa_idx.htm Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 167
socioeconomic conditions, including income levels of the residents. For instance, air quality impacts are measured against a threshold established for the region, which is not weighted or modified up or down based on a socioeconomic condition. The threshold itself is a metric by which an analyst can make a determination of the physical environmental impact caused by a project. The thresholds are established by the Air District, whose responsibility is to maintain and/or improve ambient air quality conditions to state and federal levels for all people.

Nevertheless, CEQA does require a lead agency to consider whether a project’s effects, while individually limited, are “cumulatively considerable” and therefore significant when combined with other projects. The City has considered the cumulative effects of developing the Project site with Industrial uses when they certified the Northwest Airport Master Plan EIR, as well as when they certified the General Plan EIR.

Separately, the City of Manteca considers alternative locations early in the application process. The City’s key considerations in identifying an alternative location are as follows:
• Is there an alternative location where significant effects of the proposed Project would be avoided or substantially lessened?
• Is there a site available within the City’s Sphere of Influence with the appropriate size and characteristics such that it would meet the basic Project objectives? The City’s consideration of alternative locations at the Project application level included a review of previously approved land use planning and environmental documents in Manteca including the General Plan and Northwest Airport Way Master Plan. The City noted that the Project site has been designated for industrial land uses for over a decade.

The City has determined that industrial uses in this part of the City is appropriate, in part, because of the rail infrastructure and access to major highways that would support such uses. The City has found that there are no feasible alternative locations that exist within the city limits with the appropriate size and characteristics that would meet the basic Project objectives and avoid or substantially lessen one or more significant effects of the proposed Project. The City has determined that alternative locations outside the city limits would have greater impacts that development within the city limits. For these reasons, the City of Manteca determined that there are no feasible alternative locations.

In addition, as discussed in Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553 (Goleta II), where a project is consistent with an approved general plan, no offsite alternative need be analyzed. As stated in the Project Description, no General Plan amendment or zoning change is required for the proposed Project, as the proposed Project was previously planned for by the existing General Plan. The proposed Project is consistent with the types of uses considered in the Manteca General Plan and associated EIR.

Overall, CEQA’s purpose is neither “fair treatment” nor “environmental justice” in the sense of socioeconomic conditions. Rather, CEQA centers on whether a project may have Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
168 Airport Business Centre North Project
a significant effect on the physical environment. The Draft IS/MND is consistent with the requirements of CEQA. Lastly, it should be noted that CalEEMod was used (in part) to estimate Project energy usage, as it is the Air District’s recommended model for estimating Project energy emissions for CEQA projects. It is noted that the Air District reviewed the proposed Project, and included a comment provided herein. Nowhere in their comment did they suggest that a different model should be used for this analysis.

There are no “approved energy compliance modeling softwares” for calculating energy consumption for the purposes of CEQA. The California s Building Energy Code Compliance Software (CBECC), identified by the commentor, is not relevant to estimating energy consumption under CEQA. Moreover, the latest version of CalEEMod (CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0), which was used (in part) to estimate Project energy usage, accounts for the California 2019 Energy Efficiency Standards, according to Appendix A of the CalEEMod guidance,2in contrast to the commentor’s comment that CalEEMod does not comply with the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Moreover, since the 2019 Energy Efficiency Standards are less stringent that the latest 2022 Energy Efficiency Standards, the energy impacts associated with the proposed Project are underestimated in comparison to their actual impacts. See the Final IS/MND and/or Appendix B of the Final IS/MND for further detailed results.

Response C-7: This comment suggests that an EIR needs to be prepared to include a consistency analysis with all General Plan goals and policies, including goals and policies of the General Plan Update.

The currently adopted General Plan is the 2023 General Plan, which is the same General Plan that was in effect at the time the Northwest Airport Master Plan was approved and the Draft EIR was certified. Page 3.9-17 through 3.9-53 of the Northwest Airport Master Plan Draft EIR includes the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan General Plan Consistency Analysis. The DEIR consistency analysis concludes that the Master Plan is consistent with the General Plan with the implementation of all mitigation measures and conditions imposed on projects developed within the Master Plan area. As stated in the in the Initial Study, the proposed Project is consistent with the light industrial design standards and guidelines established in the approved Northwest Airport Way Master Plan, and implements the small-scale light industrial uses that are encouraged within the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan. Additionally, all relevant mitigation measures from the certified EIR are incorporated into the Initial Study. All conditions of approval run with the land and are in effect. Therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with the applicable General Plan.

The commenter has specifically noted one goal and two policies that they believe should be analyzed for the proposed Project. These are listed below:
2 See here: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide-2021/appendix-a2020-4-

0.pdf?sfvrsn=6
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 169
• Goal AQ-2. Integrate air quality planning with land use and transportation planning processes in order to reduce vehicle miles traveled in the City and by commuters.
• C-P-49: The city shall require that new industrial development pay a fair share toward improvements required to accommodate heavy vehicles, including increased pavement wear.
• C-P-53: The City shall establish a requirement for a TDM program in any business park, industrial or commercial land use that employs more than 50 full time equivalent employees.

A Project-specific analysis focuses on consistency with the policies established by the City, and does not include a consistency analysis with goals. Goals are very broad based, whereas policies are more focused. For instance, Goal AQ-2 is a broad goal regarding regional planning as it related to land use, transportation, and air quality. Nevertheless, the City has taken steps to achieve this goal through the implementation of their land use plan, circulation plan, and their focus on reducing VMT citywide. The circulation patterns for the Master Plan itself have undergone considerable planning and engineering efforts since it was first approved. This circulation patterns have evolved such that the original plan to direct heavy truck traffic onto Airport Way and Lathrop Road has been modified to focus heavy truck traffic on Intermodal Way (internal to the Master Plan) north bound to Roth Road, then west bound to I-5. This traffic pattern modification was developed through communication and coordination with nearby residents of Manteca and the City of Lathrop. The concern was that heavy truck traffic would both congest these roadways, and provide a higher level of toxic air contaminants on these roadways. By integrating transportation, land use, and air quality, the City developed a pattern that would focus heavy truck traffic to roadways that would be least likely to impact residents, and focus only passenger vehicle traffic to the roadways of concern. The solution developed by the City is consistent with Goal AQ-2.

The proposed Project is consistent with policy C-P-49. The City has an established Public Facilities Implementation Plan (PFIP) that funds local roadway improvements, including increased pavement wear. Additionally, there are regional traffic impact fees that are charged for more regional roadway impacts. This policy is established in the General Plan, and it is implemented by the City through their existing programs. The City conditions all projects to pay the appropriate impact fees prior to grading permit. The City considers payment of these impact fees as a fair share of their impact.

The proposed Project is consistent with policy C-P-53. The City has an established travel demand model that is developed for the entire City. The model is regularly updated as new projects are developed. The forecasting that is performed through the modeling informs the City on how to manage traffic volumes and congestion within specific areas impacted by new projects. The City then conditions each project with specific improvements needed to manage traffic congestion. The Final IS/MND page 122 includes Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
170 Airport Business Centre North Project
the following Conditions of Approval that are intended to manage travel demand based on forecasting that has been performed.
• Traffic COA #1 – The developer shall pay for the total cost of construction of the Proposed Private Drive on the west site of the project site and require all truck traffic (delivery, California, and Surface Transportation Assistance Act – STAA) to use Intermodal Drive to access the Airport Business Centre North Project. • Traffic COA #2 – The developer shall pay their fair share for improvements identified in the City of Manteca Public Facilities Implementation Plan (PFIP) by paying current fees as determined by the City of Manteca prior to issuance of building permits to improve intersections in the City of Manteca. • Traffic COA #3 – The developer shall pay their fair share of the SJCOG Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) by paying current fees as determined by the City of Manteca prior to issuance of building permits top improve the Roth Road Corridor in the City of Manteca, City of Lathrop, and San Joaquin County. • Traffic COA #4 – The developer shall work with the City of Manteca Engineering Department and Caltrans District 10 to document STAA Terminal Access Route from Interstate 5 to Roth Road / Intermodal Way and Tactical Way / Airport Business Centre truck turnaround area.
• Traffic COA #5 – The developer shall pay for the current PFIP fee as determined by the City of Manteca prior to issuance of building permits to mitigate the Union Road / Lathrop Road intersection under Cumulative Conditions. Based on the City of Manteca General Plan Travel Demand Forecasting (TDF) Model. the project contributes 1.3 percent of the volume at this intersection under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, Therefore, the project’s fair share contribution would be 1.3 percent of the total cost of installing a new traffic signal controller and completing a traffic signal timing optimization study that was identified as COA#3 for the North Manteca Annexation Project.

It should be noted that the General Plan Update is not approved, is subject to change, does not have a certified EIR, and is not valid currently. As such, it is not part of the baseline conditions for the proposed Project. The General Plan Update and its Draft EIR have undergone multiple revisions since City first embarked on the long-range planning process and it is currently going through additional revisions and change so it is not appropriate to base a consistency analysis. Instead, the consistency of the proposed Project has been compared to the existing General Plan. It is noted, however, that the General Plan Update, in its current form, does not propose any changes to the Northwest Airport Master Plan area, for which the proposed Project is located. As such, there is nothing provided in the draft General Plan Update that would suggest that there is an inconsistency with the proposed Project, or the Master Plan as a whole. The proposed Project is consistent with the current Draft General Plan Update.

It is also noted that the proposed Project’s consistency with the SJCOG RTP/SCS is addressed on page 69 of the Initial Study, which concludes that the RTP/SCS includes the Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 171
Northwest Airport Way Master Plan in their population and employment projections, and VMT increases associated with buildout of the City of Manteca. It is noted that the land use and circulation model that the SJCOG has established for their RTP/SCS is based on the Project site, and Master Plan area as a whole, being developed with the same industrial development that has been anticipated on the site for over 10 years. The land use and circulation patterns drive the development of the RTP/SCS action and financing plan. There is not anything that is proposed that is inconsistent with the RTP/SCS. The proposed Project is consistent with the RTP/SCS.

Finally, the proposed Project is not a residential project, and therefore the City’s Growth Management Ordinance is not applicable to light industrial projects. The Growth Management Ordinance is only appliable to residential developments.

The City's periodically updates their list of ongoing commercial and industrial projects.

The City’s most current list of these projects can be found at the following link:
https://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/CommunityDevelopment/Planning%20Division/gpstatus/ Documents/Commercial_Projects_2016-2020_24x36.pdf
Response C-8: This commenter provides a set of comments regarding the “Population and Housing” analysis.

The proposed Project is estimated to generate approximately 342 employees. The proposed Project trip generation analysis was based on having 342 employees on-site per day, or approximately 1 employee per 1,053 gross square feet for the proposed Project.

Not all employees would live and work in the City of Manteca. Employees are projected to live in several communities in the San Joaquin County, including Manteca, Lathrop, Ripon, Stockton and other unincorporated areas of San Joaquin County. It is not anticipated that people would commute to this job from areas outside the region. It is common for residents of the City of Manteca and surrounding communities in San Joaquin County to commute to higher paying jobs located in the San Francisco Bay Area which has a higher cost of living and higher paying jobs. However, it is not common that people living in the Bay Area with higher costs of living would commute to Manteca for a job in a warehouse that pays considerably lower than jobs in the Bay Area. For these reasons, it is anticipated that the warehouse jobs provided by this Project would come from residents in Manteca or the immediately surrounding communities.

The land uses for the Project site have been established for over a decade. SJCOG develops their projections based on long range planning documents from the communities that they serve. For instance, the growth projections that SJCOG establishes for Manteca are derived from the City of Manteca General Plan, Master Plans, etc. The proposed Project is part of the Northwest Airport Master Plan, which is known by SJCOG and is assumed within their growth projections. The Northwest Airport Way Master Plan EIR anticipated employment growth of 2,588 jobs over the 15-year Master Plan. The total employees generated by the proposed Project is well within the assumptions of the Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
172 Airport Business Centre North Project
Master Plan. The Master Plan, as an approved project, was accounted for in the City's Household and Employment projections.

Separately, the commentor states that the claim that “The Project site is currently vacant and does not contain housing. The proposed Project would not displace housing or people,” (as stated in Section XIV: Population and Housing of the IS/MND) is contradictory to the statement made in the IS/MND Project Description, which states that “A rural residence is located in the northeastern quadrant.” Based on this comment, the Final IS/MND has been revised to identify the housing located within the Project site. The impact for the Population and Housing topic impact b) has been revised to a “less than significant” impact determination, from a “no impact” significance determination.

Despite this revision, this revision to the Final IS/MND does not cause a potentially significant impact.

Response C-9: This commenter provides a set of comments regarding the “Transportation” analysis.

The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Fehr & Peers for the Project utilized a blended trip rate for warehouse industrial land uses, consistent with the blended trip rates from the Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021) and the City of Manteca Travel Demand Forecasting (TDF) Model that was developed for the General Plan 2020/2040 Update. Specifically, as was used for other projects such as the nearby GBxManteca project, the blended trip generation rate for the proposed Project utilized the following ITE Land Use Codes and weighted percentages:
• Land Use Code 110: 10%
• Land Use Code 130: 14%
• Land Use Code 150: 16%
• Land Use Code 154: 48%
• Land Use Code 155: 5%
• Land Use Code 156: 4%
• Land Use Code 157: 3%
In addition, as described in the Traffic Impact Analysis, The Baseline VMT and Cumulative Project VMT was developed using the City of Manteca travel demand model that was derived from the San Joaquin Council of Government’s (SJCOG) Regional Travel Demand Model. The model was developed in 2020 and calibrated to adjusted pre-COVID-19 traffic counts. Roadway improvements and land use projections consistent with the SJCOG Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), City of Manteca General Plan, and City of Lathrop General Plan were added to the Cumulative Conditions Model. A model-wide analysis was preformed to obtain daily trips and travel distance for all Industrial Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs), and the product of daily trips and travel distance was summed up to obtain VMT estimates. It should be noted that the VMT analysis was based on Interconnect Way being constructed to provide access to and from Intermodal Way, Roth Road and the I-5 / Roth Road interchange for project-generated California Legal and STAA Truck traffic. The Traffic Impact Analysis Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 173
accounted for workers traveling from communities outside of the City of Manteca. Based on this, the Traffic Impact Analysis does not rely on upon a workforce living artificially close to the Project site, as claimed by the commentor.

The Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis is consistent with Senate Bill (SB) 743, the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts (December 2018), and the VMTFocused Transportation Impact Study Guide (May 2020), and includes all passenger cars, SUVs and light duty trucks driven by employees to and from the project site. Consistent with SB 743 technical guidelines, the VMT analysis does not include Delivery, California, or STAA truck / trailer vehicle miles traveled. The analysis contained in Appendix B analyzed VMT per industrial employee consistent with the VMT-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide.

In addition to the VMT analysis, the Transportation Impact Analysis Report (Appendix B), also included the trip generation analysis which includes both employee vehicles (Table 3) for passenger cars, sport utility vehicles (SUV) and light duty trucks. The trip generation analysis also includes trucks (Table 4) for delivery California, and Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA).

The City of Manteca Travel Demand Model used the same transportation planning industry software (Cube) for both Baseline and Cumulative Conditions that the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) used for the regional travel demand model. In addition, the same Cube Model is being used for the City of Manteca General Plan and EIR (Manteca General Plan Update). And the land use designation for the proposed Project is consistent with both the currently adopted General Plan and Draft General Plan Update.

The Baseline Citywide VMT per industrial employee was determined by summing the total distance all industrial workers that are employed in the City of Manteca traveled, and dividing this total VMT by the total number of industrial workers. This resulted in the baseline citywide VMT of 75.3 miles per industrial employee and a Cumulative with Project VMT of 74.8 miles per industrial employee. This represents a 0.6% decrease when compared to baseline city-wide average. Therefore, the construction of the proposed Project will improve the jobs to housing balance in the City of Manteca and provide an overall benefit to reducing VMT per employee, fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. The jobs to housing balance is improved by increasing the number of jobs in the City of Manteca. In order to have a less than significant impact relative to this primary CEQA topic, the proposed Project will be required to have all trucks access the facility using Intermodal Way and only employee access will be allowed from Airport Way.

The construction of the Airport Business Centre North Project will provide approximately 342 industrial jobs on a typical weekday, and will improve the jobs to housing balance in Manteca, Lathrop, Ripon, Stockton and other unincorporated areas of San Joaquin County. Also moving the employment closer to the labor force has the overall benefit of reducing VMT per employee by a much larger amount if workers were required to drive the San Francisco Bay Area versus staying in the City of Manteca and San Joaquin County.

Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
174 Airport Business Centre North Project
It should also be noted that by reducing VMT per employee by a conservative one mile per weekday for each of the 342 employee, fuel consumption would be reduced by approximately 3,420 gallons per year and greenhouse gas emissions would be reduced by approximately 65,224 pounds.

Response C-10: This commenter provides a set of comments regarding the “Mandatory Findings of Significance” analysis.

As stated by the commenter, the City of Manteca maintains a list of ongoing commercial and industrial projects. All City documents, including a list of ongoing commercial and industrial projects, can be found on the City’s website (https://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/CommunityDevelopment/Planning%20Division/gpstatus /Documents/Commercial_Projects_2016-2020_24x36.pdf), or in person at the City Hall.

The list in question has been included as an Appendix in the Final IS/MND.

The suggestion that an EIR must be prepared that includes a cumulative analysis in relation to the City’s growth management requirements underscores the commenters misunderstanding of the City’s growth management requirements. The City’s growth management requirements are specific to residential projects, which drive new residents living in the city limits of Manteca. The proposed Project does not generate any new homes, and therefore, does not directly result in population growth. Instead, page 107 of the Initial Study accurately reflects the City’s expectation that jobs created would be served by residents of Manteca and surrounding communities. It is not reasonable to assume that people would commute to work in this warehouse from communities outside communities that are in the regional vicinity. As noted under Response C-8, it is common for residents of the City of Manteca and surrounding communities in San Joaquin County to commute to higher paying jobs located in the San Francisco Bay Area which has a higher cost of living and higher paying jobs. However, it is not common that people living in the Bay Area with higher costs of living would commute to Manteca for a job in a warehouse that pays considerably lower than jobs in the Bay Area. For these reasons, it is anticipated that the warehouse jobs provided by this Project would come from residents in Manteca or the immediately surrounding communities.

It is also noted that the certified EIR for the Northwest Airport Master Plan included a cumulative analysis of buildout of the parcels within the Master Plan Area, which included the Project site. The full Draft and Final EIR can be viewed on the City’s website at the following link:
https://www.ci.manteca.ca.us/CommunityDevelopment/Planning%20Division/Pages/Pl anning-DivisionDocuments.aspx?RootFolder=%2FCommunityDevelopment%2FPlanning%20Division%2F Planning%20Division%20Documents%2FMaster%20And%20Specific%20Plans%2FNorth west%20Airport%20Way%20Master%20Plan&FolderCTID=0x012000C1D839DE3D40754 0A4D0E9B464C9237D&View=%7BC6EEA1A9%2D842B%2D49CD%2D94D1%2DE0D08910 FEFD%7D.

Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 175
The cumulative analysis considered the new development relative to anticipated growth in the region. The Northwest Airport Master Plan was approved approximately 12 years ago, and has since been anticipated within all regional planning documents including the City of Manteca’s General Plan, and SJCOG’s Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. In addition to these relevant long-range planning documents, development of the Northwest Airport Master Plan area has been well known by the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission, the Cities of Lathrop, Stockton, Ripon, and Tracy, and the County and San Joaquin.

The City of Manteca recognizes that the certified EIR for the Northwest Airport Master Plan includes conclusions where significant and unavoidable impacts would occur as the Master Plan develops. The City has not changed, nor do they suggest, that the significant and unavoidable conclusions should or will change as a result of any individual project within the Master Plan area, including the proposed Project. This holds true for direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts. The City has adopted statement of overriding considerations for those significant and unavoidable impacts as part of the original certification of the Northwest Airport Master Plan EIR, and the proposed Project contributes to the impacts disclosed under the original certified EIR. All mitigation measures from the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan EIR are applicable to the proposed Project, and have been incorporated into the Initial Study on pages 7-13. (Table PD-1) For this second tier CEQA document, however, the City has followed the statutory requirements for analyzing individual projects developed within an already approved Project for which an EIR is certified. More specifically, the analysis in the Initial Study is focused on the “New Information” that is now known, that was not, or could not have been known at the time the original analysis was performed. The most significant new information is the VMT analysis, which is a new requirement based on a change in state law. The VMT analysis provided on pages 122-125 of the Initial Study further describes that there would be a less than significant impact from VMT.

There is no evidence that the proposed Project would have new significant impacts that have not already been addressed by the first tier EIR. The City requires all individual projects within the Northwest Airport Master Plan to implement mitigation measures and conditions of approve adopted as part of the Northwest Airport Master Plan to reduce impacts to the extent possible. All of the previously adopted mitigation measures and conditions of approved are in effect for the proposed Project.

Response C-11: This comment serves as a closing statement for the commenter. The commenter requests to be included on a list to receive subsequent information regarding this project.

This comment is noted. The City has added the commenter to the list for this project.

Response C-12: This comment serves as an introduction to a letter that was attached to the main commenter’s letter. The comment suggests that the IS/MND does not adequately evaluate the proposed Project’s air quality and health risk impacts. Being an introduction, this specific comment does not provide any supporting evidence, rather, their arguments Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
176 Airport Business Centre North Project
are provided in subsequent comments. The introduction does not warrant a response. All subsequent comments are addressed subsequently in the following responses.

Response C-13: The commentor states that there are unsubstantiated input parameters used to estimate project emissions. The commentor states that the IS/MND’s air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with CalEEMod. The commentor states that they found several model inputs that were not consistent with the information disclosed in the IS/MND. The commentor then states that, therefore, the proposed Project’s construction and operational emissions are underestimated. The commentor states that an EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis to adequately address the impacts that Project construction and operation will have on local and regional air quality.

This comment is noted. This comment is a general comment that lacks specificity, instead, this comment serves as a preface to more detailed individual comments provided under Comments C-14 through C-20. Based on comments received, more detailed responses to the individual input parameters identified by the commentor for each of the Comments C-14 through C-20 are provided in the responses below. The modeling uses defaults where more specific details are not available, as recommended by CalEEMod.3 CalEEMod utilizes default data that can be used when site-specific information is not available. Users of CalEEMod are required to provide justifications for all changes made to the default values (see the CalEEMod v.2020.4.0 User’s Guide for more detail). The user may only override the defaults when more accurate, project-specific information is available and appropriate. Where more specific information was available and appropriate (with substantial evidence), the defaults were overridden with the specific information. The updated emissions outputs do not change any impact conclusions. It is also noted, that through the initiation of Rule 9510 review with the Air District, the Air District performs their own modeling. That modeling is consistent with the model included in the Final IS/MND. See below for individual responses to the individual comments, in the responses to Comments C-14 through C-20, below.

Response C-14: The commentor states that the CalEEMod modeling fails to consider potential cold storage requirements. However, the proposed Project would not include any cold storage. Rather, as provided in the IS/MND Project Description, the facility will operate as a distribution warehouse. The warehouse would not be refrigerated. That is, the Project would not contain any refrigerated warehouse space whatsoever. Should any development occur on-site that would include any refrigerated warehouse space, additional CEQA analysis would be required. No further response to this comment is warranted.

Response C-15: This commenter states that there were unsubstantiated changes to area coating emission factors. Specifically, the commentor states that there were several reductions within the 3 See the CalEEMod v.2020.4.0 User’s Guide for more detail. Available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/user-guide-2021/01_user-39-s-guide2020-4-0.pdf?sfvrsn=6 Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 177
CalEEMod model to the default area and architectural coating (interior) emission factors.

Specifically, the commentor identifies the changes to the operational architectural and area coating ROG emission factors for interior coatings from 150 g/L of to 0 g/L.

Architectural coatings for the interior of the proposed Project building would have 0 g/L VOCs, since the Project does not contain interior coatings. Therefore, the usage of a 0 g/L of ROG emission factor for interior coatings in the CalEEMod model is supported by substantial evidence, since no architectural coatings would be applied to the interior of the Project. No further response to this comment is warranted.

Response C-16: The commentor states that there was a failure to substantiate the amount of soil import or export. While grading would occur on-site, the use of import (fill) and export (cut) is not anticipated; the grading of soils would be balanced on-site. This is because the Project site is relatively flat. The Project site has been previously used for agricultural purposes, and therefore has been previously graded. As stated in the IS/MND Project Description, the project site is generally flat, with an elevation range of approximately 22 to 25 feet.

No further response to this comment is warranted.

Response C-17: The commentor states that, in an effort to prepare a more accurate model of the Project’s construction-related emissions, the commentor prepared an updated CalEEMod model. According to their revisions to the model, the commentor claims that construction-related VOC emissions would exceed the applicable Air District threshold.

This comment is noted. However, we do not agree with the changes made to the model by the commentor. For example, we do not agree with the changes to the vehicle fleet mix and the exclusion of mobile- and water-related operational mitigation measures, as the commentor describes as having changed. Further detail is provided in Responses C14 through C-16, and Response C-18 through C-20. No further response to this comment is warranted.

Response C-18: The commentor states that the diesel particulate matter health risk emissions were inadequately evaluated. Specifically, the commentor requests a quantified health risk analysis (“HRA”) be conducted.

As provided in the IS/MND, the proposed Project has the potential to impact nearby sensitive receptors during the construction and operational phases. Specifically, the proposed Project has the potential to generate DPM from on- and off-road construction vehicles, during the construction phase. In addition, the proposed Project has the potential to impact nearby sensitive receptors during operation, due to the proposed Project’s generation of trips by heavy-duty diesel trucks, which are also an emitter of DPM. In particular, DPM during Project operation is emitted from on-site heavy-duty truck vehicle circulation and idling, and off-site mobile travel. Combined, these sources of DPM (both construction and operational) have the potential to generate TACs on nearby sensitive receptors, including those located nearest to the Project site. Both sources of Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
178 Airport Business Centre North Project
DPM (both construction and operational) were addressed in the IS/MND, and is described in further detail below.

The SJVAPCD has established a screening calculator entitled the “Prioritization Calculator”. An estimate of DPM emissions generated by the heavy-duty trucks and delivery vans associated with the proposed Project during Project operation was calculated for on-site mobile and idling emissions, and off-site mobile emissions 0.25 miles from the Project site, combined with the exhaust DPM emissions from both on- and off-road vehicles during the Project’s construction phase, amortized over 70 years, in accordance with the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) guidance, as recommended by the SJVAPCD. The estimate of DPM emissions was based on the data provided in the Transportation Analysis for the proposed Project, and with diesel particulate matter mobile emission rates from CARB’s EMFAC2021 database (for year 2022, San Joaquin County; emission rates for DPM; 10 MPH for on-site truck travel and 55 MPH for off-site truck travel), and from standard heavy-duty truck idling emission rates from CARB.

As described on pages 40 and 41 of the IS/MND, the results of the screening analysis show that the cancer and non-cancer risks associated with the proposed Project are below the SJVAPCD screening thresholds contained within their Prioritization Calculator.

Specifically, the Prioritization Calculator estimates that the prioritization score associated with total cancer risk from proposed project operational DPM would be approximately

4.62, and from construction DPM 1.584, for a total of 6.20, well below the SJVAPCD threshold of 10 that would require development of air toxics Health Risk Assessment (HRA) that includes air dispersion modeling. Additionally, non-cancer (i.e. chronic and acute risks) associated with project DPM would also be well below the applicable thresholds for the Maximally Exposed Individual (i.e. greater than or equal to the Hazard Index level of 1). Therefore, the complex air dispersion modeling using software such as AERMOD is not required. See Appendix B of the IS/MND for further detail.

Therefore, a full HRA is not required for the proposed Project, since the proposed Project’s screening level is below the applicable SJVAPCD thresholds within their Prioritization calculator. See Appendix B of the IS/MND for further detail.

Response C-19: The commentor states they conducted a screening-level assessment using AERSCREEN.

Based on the commentor’s analysis, the commentor states that they calculated that excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) is approximately 50.8 in one million, which would exceed the SJVAPCD threshold of 20 in one million.

This comment is noted. However, the analysis provided by the commentor is overly conservative. The commentor even describes that their analysis represents a screening4 It should be noted that construction-generated sources of DPM emissions would be greater than 100 meters from the nearest sensitive receptor, on average, as measures by Google Earth.

Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 179
level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection.

As described in detail under Response C-18, the SJVAPCD has established a screening calculator entitled the “Prioritization Calculator”, which was specifically designed to be the screening approach for projects within the jurisdiction of the SJVAPCD. As described on pages 40 and 41 of the IS/MND, the results of the screening analysis show that the cancer and non-cancer risks associated with the proposed Project are below the SJVAPCD screening thresholds contained within their Prioritization Calculator. Therefore, the complex air dispersion modeling using software such as AERSCREEN or AERMOD is not required. See Appendix B of the IS/MND for further detail.

As described also under Response C-18, a full HRA is not required for the proposed Project, since the proposed Project’s screening level is below the applicable SJVAPCD thresholds within their Prioritization calculator. See Appendix B of the IS/MND for further detail. No further response to this comment is warranted.

Response C-20: The commentor states that the Project should implement further mitigation. The commentor provides additional sample mitigation, including SCAG’s 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR’s Air Quality Project Level Mitigation Measures (“PMM-AQ-1”), as well as mitigation measures that can be found in the Department of Justice Warehouse Project Best Practices document, as well as other mitigation measures. The commentor also reiterates their recommendation that an EIR should be prepared for the Project.

This comment is noted. As provided within the IS/MND, no impacts were determined to have a “potentially significant impact”. Therefore, additional mitigation beyond what was included in the IS/MND is not required; further, an EIR is also not required. No further response to this comment is warranted.

Response C-21: This comment serves as a disclaimer, closing statement. This comment also includes resumes of two individuals responsible for preparing the letter. No response is warranted.

Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
180 Airport Business Centre North Project
D-1
D-2
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 181
D-2 Cont’d
D-3
D-4
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
182 Airport Business Centre North Project
D-5
D-6
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 183
D-6 Cont’d
D-7
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
184 Airport Business Centre North Project
D-8
D-7 Cont’d
Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Airport Business Centre North Project 185
Response to Letter D: Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Response D-1: This comment is noted. This comment serves as an introduction to the letter and does not warrant a response. No further response is necessary.

Response D-2: The comment provides background information regarding the responsibilities of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). This information further elaborates on regulatory information regarding the Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Valley Region (Basin Plan), which is the guiding document for water quality and sustainable groundwater management in the region. Hydrology and Water Quality is discussed on pages 66 through71 of the Initial Study, and in Section 3.8 of the Draft EIR for the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan. No further response is necessary.

Response D-3: The comment provides information regarding “Antidegradation Considerations,” including the Basin Plan’s policy and analysis requirements for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) permitting. Hydrology and Water Quality is discussed on pages 66 through71 of the Initial Study, and in Section 3.8 of the Draft EIR for the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan.

Mitigation Measures HYD-1, HYD-2, and HYD-4 for the Northwest Airport Way Master Plan are aimed at reducing water quality impacts. The proposed Project is subject to the requirements of the NPDES and WDR, which are existing regulatory requirements. No further response is necessary.

Response D-4: The comment identifies construction storm water permit requirements for projects that disturb one or more acres of soil or are part of a larger plan that in total disturbs one or more acres of soil. These are regulatory requirements that require the Project Applicant to obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities (Construction General Permit), Construction General Permit Order No. 2009-009-DWQ. To do so, the applicant(s) must prepare a Project-specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which would incorporate BMPs in order to prevent or reduce to the greatest extent feasible adverse impacts to water quality from erosion and sedimentation. Mitigation Measure HYD-1 specifically requirements the preparation of a SWPPP and implementation of BMPs. The proposed Project would comply with the General Construction Stormwater Permit from the Central Valley RWQCB.

Response D-5: The comment identifies construction storm water permit requirements MS4 permit requirements. The City is classified as a Phase II city by the State Water Resources Control Board. As such, the City, and consequently new development, is required to comply with the State Board’s storm water National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for Phase II cities.

Response C-6: This comment discusses requirements of Section 404 and 401 of the federal Clean Water Act, and discharges to Waters of the State. As discussed on page 40 of the Initial Study, Exhibit "B"

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
186 Airport Business Centre North Project
the Project site does not have any jurisdictional waters and is not subject to these permit requirements.

Response D-7: This comment discusses dewater permit requirements. Dewatering is not anticipated to be required as a result of construction of the proposed Project. However, should groundwater be encountered during construction and dewatering become necessary, the applicant would be required to seek the proper NPDES permit for dewatering activities.

Response D-8: This comment discuses NPDES permits, and the preparation of Waste Discharge Reports.

These are regulatory requirements that require the Project Applicant operating under a NPDES permit to complete and submit a report of Waste Discharge to the Central Valley RWQCB. The proposed Project is required to comply with these requirements.

Exhibit "B"