AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”) is made and entered into this _______ day of__________, ___________, by and between the CITY OF MANTECA, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Consultant
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento CA 95814
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
a North Carolina corporation
hereinafter referred to as “CONSULTANT”.
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, CITY desires to enter into this Agreement for services for on-call grant research, writing, management services for Engineering Department B. WHEREAS, CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to provide these services by reason of its qualifications, applicable license(s), and experience for performing such services, and CONSULTANT has offered to provide the required services on the terms and in the manner set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants, the parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES:
A. Consultant shall do all work, attend all meetings, produce all reports and carry out all activities necessary to complete the services described in Exhibit “A”. This AGREEMENT and its exhibits shall be known as the “Agreement Documents”. Terms set forth in any Agreement Document shall be deemed to be incorporated in all Agreement Documents as if set forth in full herein. In the event of conflict between terms contained in these Agreement Documents, the more specific term shall govern. If any portion of the Agreement Documents is in conflict with any other portion or provisions contained in the AGREEMENT, the AGREEMENT shall govern over the conflicting provisions contained in the exhibits to the AGREEMENT. To eliminate doubt, in the case of conflict between Consultant's proposal or Consultant's attachments and the City's AGREEMENT and attachments, the City's AGREEMENT and attachments shall take precedence over Consultant's proposal and attachments.
ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
2 B. Consultant enters into this AGREEMENT as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. The Consultant shall have no power or authority by this AGREEMENT to bind the City in any respect. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Consultant and not of the City. The City shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wage claims or other claims made against Consultant by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or any other person resulting from performance of this AGREEMENT.
C. The Consultant agrees it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this AGREEMENT is based on such independent investigation and research.
2. TERM OF AGREEMENT
A. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall be completed and this AGREEMENT terminated on April 16, 2027, unless otherwise extended in writing by the mutual agreement of both parties.
B. The City Manager or designee may, by written instrument signed by the Parties, extend the duration of this AGREEMENT in the manner provided in Section 5, provided that the extension does not require the payment of compensation in excess of the maximum compensation set forth in Section 3, Compensation.
3. COMPENSATION:
A. The Consultant shall be paid in accordance to the attached Fee Schedule in Exhibit “C”. Consultant charges separately for certain costs incurred in the representation, as well as for any disbursements to third parties made on City's behalf. Such costs and disbursements include, for example, the following: mileage (at the IRS rate in effect at the time the travel occurs), overnight delivery and messenger services. Consultant shall be reimbursed for expenses related to travel, for example (flights, hotels, meals). However, Consultant shall not make travel arrangements or incur costs on behalf of City without prior written authorization to incur said expenses and in no event shall total compensation under this AGREEMENT exceed $75,000 annually or exceed $225,000.00 over the duration of the agreement without City’s prior written approval.
B. Said amount shall be paid upon submittal of monthly billings showing completion of the tasks that month. Consultant shall furnish City with invoices for all expenses as well as for all materials authorized by this AGREEMENT. The invoices shall be submitted with the monthly billings.
C. If the work is temporarily suspended at the request of the City, compensation shall be based upon the portion of work completed as of the date of the suspension, subject to Section
4. ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
3 4. TERMINATION:
A. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either party, provided that the other party is given not less than fourteen (14) calendar days’ written notice (delivered by registered mail) of intent to terminate.
B. The City may temporarily suspend this AGREEMENT, at no additional cost to City, provided that the Consultant is given written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of temporary suspension. If City gives such notice of temporary suspension, Consultant shall immediately suspend its activities under this AGREEMENT.
C. Notwithstanding any provisions of this AGREEMENT, Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this AGREEMENT by Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments due to Consultant until such time as the exact amount of damages, if any, due the City from Consultant is determined.
D. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be compensated as provided for in this AGREEMENT, except as provided in Section 4C. Upon termination, the City shall be entitled to all final work and draft work, including but not limited to, appraisals, inventories, studies, analyses, drawings and data estimates performed to that date in accordance with Section 7 herein.
5. AMENDMENTS, CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS:
Amendments, changes or modifications in the terms of this AGREEMENT may be made at any time by mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and shall be signed by the persons authorized to bind the parties hereto.
6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME:
Consultant may, for good cause, request extensions of time to perform the services required herein. Such extensions shall be authorized in advance by the City in writing and shall be incorporated in written amendments to this AGREEMENT in the manner provided in Section
5. 7. PROPERTY OF CITY:
A. It is mutually agreed that all draft and final materials prepared by the Consultant under this AGREEMENT shall become the property of the City, and the Consultant shall have no property right therein whatsoever. Immediately upon termination, the City shall be entitled to, and the Consultant shall deliver to the City, all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and other such materials as may have been prepared or accumulated to date by the Consultant in performing this AGREEMENT which is not Consultant’s privileged information, as defined by law, or Consultant’s personnel information, along with all other property belonging exclusively to the City which is in the Consultant’s possession.
B. Additionally, it is agreed that the parties intend this to be an AGREEMENT for services and each considers the products and results of the services to be rendered by Consultant herein (the “Work”) to be a work made for hire. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
4 Work (and all rights therein, including, without limitation, copyright) belongs to and shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City.
8. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS:
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, State and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this AGREEMENT. It shall be City’s responsibility to obtain all rights of way and easements to enable Consultant to perform its services herein.
Consultant shall assist City in providing the same.
B. Consultant warrants to the City that it is licensed by all applicable governmental bodies to perform this AGREEMENT and will remain so licensed throughout the progress of the Work, and that it has, and will have, throughout the progress of the Work, the necessary experience, skill and financial resources to enable it to perform this AGREEMENT.
9. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONSULTANT:
A. Consultant agrees and represents that it is qualified to properly provide the services set forth in Exhibit “A” in a manner which is consistent with the generally accepted standards of Consultant’s profession.
B. Consultant agrees and represents that the work performed under this AGREEMENT shall be in accordance with applicable federal, State and local law in accordance with Section 17A hereof.
C. Consultant shall designate a project manager who at all times shall represent the Consultant before the City on all matters relating to this AGREEMENT. The project manager shall continue in such capacity unless and until he or she is removed at the request of the City, is no longer employed by Consultant, or is replaced with the written approval of the City.
D. Consultant shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for services which fail to meet the above professional and legal standards and which are reported to Consultant in writing within sixty (60) days of discovery. Should Consultant fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations, the City may render or undertake performance thereof and the Consultant shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.
10. SUBCONTRACTING:
None of the services covered by this AGREEMENT shall be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City. Consultant shall be fully responsible to the City for the negligent acts and omissions of its contractors and subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as it is for the negligent acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant.
11. ASSIGNABILITY:
Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this AGREEMENT whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the City. However, claims for money due or to become due to Consultant from the City under this AGREEMENT may be assigned to a financial institution, or to a trustee in bankruptcy, without such approval. Notice of any ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
5 assignment or transfer whether voluntary or involuntary shall be furnished promptly to the City.
12. INTEREST IN AGREEMENT:
Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the subject of the AGREEMENT, nor any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant shall make all disclosures required by the City’s conflict of interest code in accordance with the category designated by the City, unless the City Manager determines in writing that Consultant’s duties are more limited in scope than is warranted by the category designated by the City code and that a narrower disclosure category should apply. Consultant also agrees to make disclosure in compliance with the City conflict of interest code if, at any time after the execution of this AGREEMENT, City determines and notifies Consultant in writing that Consultant’s duties under this AGREEMENT warrant greater disclosure by Consultant than was originally contemplated. Consultant shall make disclosures in the time, place and manner set forth in the conflict of interest code and as directed by the City.
13. MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL:
All of the materials prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to performance of this AGREEMENT are confidential and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City, except by court order.
14. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT-NEGLIGENCE:
Consultant shall be responsible for performing the work under this AGREEMENT in a manner which is consistent with the generally-accepted standards of the Consultant’s profession and shall be liable for its own negligence and the negligent acts of its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors. The City shall have no right of control over the manner in which the work is to be done but only as to its outcome, and shall not be charged with the responsibility of preventing risk to Consultant or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors.
15. INDEMNITY AND LITIGATION COSTS:
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, and employees against all claims, damages, demands, liability, costs, losses and expenses, including without limitation court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising from Consultant's negligent acts or negligent failure to act, errors, omissions or willful misconduct incident to the performance of this AGREEMENT except such loss or damage caused solely by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive termination or suspension of this AGREEMENT.
16. CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE:
A. Consultant shall not commence any work before obtaining, and shall maintain in full force at all times during the duration and performance of this AGREEMENT, the policies of insurance specified in this Section. Such insurance must have the approval of the City as to limit, form, and amount, and shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
6 than “A” in Class VII (an NR rating is acceptable for Worker’s Compensation insurance written with the State Compensation Insurance Fund of California).
B. Prior to execution of this AGREEMENT and prior to commencement of any work, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and copies of endorsements providing evidence of coverage for all policies required by the AGREEMENT. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall, at their expense, maintain in effect at all times during the performance of work under the AGREEMENT not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this AGREEMENT. The failure of Consultant or of any of its contractors or subcontractors to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this AGREEMENT.
Approval of the insurance by the City shall not relieve or decrease any liability of Consultant.
1. Commercial General Liability Insurance.
a. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01 (or equivalent), in an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence and four million dollars ($4,000,000) minimum limit for general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, including without limitation, blanket contractual liability. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Consultant’s general liability policies shall be primary and shall not seek contribution from the City’s coverage, and be endorsed using Insurance Services Office form CG 20 10 (or equivalent) to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents shall be additional insureds under such policies. For construction projects, an endorsement providing completed operations coverage for the additional insured, ISO form CG 20 37 (or equivalent), is also required.
b. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies by Consultant shall not affect coverage provided the City. c. Coverage shall state that Consultant insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
d. Coverage shall contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City.
2. Automobile Liability. If vehicles are brought onto city facilities, Consultant shall maintain automobile liability with limits no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) minimum limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limits of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000). Consultant shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a waiver of subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers. Consultant shall sign the Certificate of Compliance with labor Code 3700 (Exhibit B).
4. Professional Liability. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that insures against professional errors and omissions that may be made in performing ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
7 the Services to be rendered in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this agreement, and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three years after completion of the services required by this agreement.
5. All Coverages.
a. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled, or reduced in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice has been given to the City. b. All self-insurance, self-insured retentions, and deductibles must be declared and approved by the City.
c. Evidence of Insurance - Prior to commencement of work, the Consultant shall furnish to the City certificates, additional insured endorsements, and waivers of subrogation evidencing compliance with the insurance requirements above. The Consultant must agree to provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies when requested by the City.
d. Acceptability of Insurers - Insurance shall be placed with insurers admitted in the State of California and with an A.M. Best rating of “A” Class VII or higher. e. Subcontractors and Consultants - A category of risk and the applicable insurance requirements will be determined on a “per subcontractor” or “per consultant” basis, considering the particular work to be done by the subcontractor or consultant and the interrelationship of that work to other work being conducted by the Consultant.
6. No other provision of this Agreement or any attachment thereto shall reduce the insurance or indemnity obligations imposed under this Section.
C. In addition to any other remedy the City may have, if Consultant fails to maintain the insurance coverage as required in this Section, the City may obtain such insurance coverage that is not being maintained, in the form and amount substantially the same as is required herein, and the City may deduct the cost of such insurance from any amounts due or which may become due to Consultant under this AGREEMENT.
D. No policy required by this AGREEMENT shall be suspended, cancelled, terminated by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits unless written approval is obtained by Consultant from the City.
E. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be declared to, and approved by, the City.
F. The requirement as to types, limits, and the City’s approval of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant are not intended to, and shall not in any manner, limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations assumed by Consultant under the AGREEMENT.
ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
8 17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:
A. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of, shall observe and comply with, and shall cause any and all persons, firms or corporations employed by it or under its control to observe and comply with, applicable federal, state, county and municipal laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on the work described by this AGREEMENT or the materials used or which in any way affect the conduct of the work.
B. Unlawful Acts. Consultant shall not engage in unlawful employment discrimination.
Such unlawful employment discrimination includes, but is not limited to, employment discrimination based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, citizenship, or sexual orientation.
C. Record Retention. Consultant shall maintain and make available for inspection by the City and its auditors accurate records of all of its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to any work under this AGREEMENT. Such inspections may be made during regular office hours at any time until six (6) months after the final payments under this AGREEMENT are made to the Consultant.
D. Notice. All notices that are required to be given by one party to the other under this AGREEMENT shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered personally or enclosed in a properly addressed envelope and deposited in a United States Post Office for delivery by registered or certified mail addressed to the parties at the following addresses:
City: Consultant:
Carrie Whitney
Administrative Analyst
City of Manteca
1001 W. Center St. Suite E
Manteca, CA 95337
209-456-8000
Frederik Venter, P.E.
Principal-in-Charge and Vice President
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
916-858-5800
E. Governing Law and Venue. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of California, and any legal action relating to this AGREEMENT shall take place in the Superior Court, County of San Joaquin.
F. Waiver. Waiver of any breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach or default of the same or any other provision under this AGREEMENT.
G. Severability. If any provision of this AGREEMENT is held to be invalid, illegal or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this AGREEMENT shall continue in full force and effect.
H. Mediation. In the event of any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the Services provided by Consultant (each referred to as a “Dispute” and all collectively referred to as the “Disputes”), the Parties shall try to resolve all Disputes through good faith, direct discussions involving the representatives of each Party who possess the necessary ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
9 authority to resolve such Dispute. If direct discussions are unsuccessful in resolving a Dispute, the Parties shall endeavor to resolve the matter by mediation through and administered by JAMS or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the name of five (5) qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS, and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation.
I. Costs and Attorney' Fees. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action may recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees.
J. Entire Agreement. This AGREEMENT constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the services specified herein and no modification hereof shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to this AGREEMENT. There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties or promises, with respect to this AGREEMENT, except those contained in or referred to in writing.
K. Execution. This AGREEMENT may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy has been signed by both parties.
L. Authority to Enter Agreement Consultant warrants that it has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform this AGREEMENT.
Each party warrants to the other that the signature to this AGREEMENT have the legal power, right, and authority to enter into this AGREEMENT and to bind each party.
M. California Prevailing Wage Requirement Pursuant to California Labor Code sections 1720 through 1861, the Consultant, its Contractor and all subcontractors shall ensure that all workers who perform work under this Agreement are paid not less than the prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), if applicable. This includes work performed during the design, site assessment, feasibility study, and other preconstruction phases of construction, including but not limited to inspection and land surveying work, regardless of whether any further construction work is conducted, and work performed during the post-construction phases of construction, including but not limited to all cleanup work at the jobsite. The most current prevailing wage determination can be found at https://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm.
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
11 EXHIBIT A
Consultant Proposal/Scope of Work
ATTACHMENT 2
PROPOSAL FOR
On-Call Grant
Research, Writing,
and Management
Services
PREPARED BY:
PREPARED FOR:
City of Manteca
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
A. COVER LETTER & MEMORANDA .......................................................................... ii B. CONTRACT TERMINATION CIRCUMSTANCES ...................................................... 1 C. TECHNICAL CONTENT .......................................................................................... 1
1. Qualifications, Related Experience, and References .................................... 1
2. Proposed Staffing and Project Organization ................................................ 8
3. Hourly Rates .................................................................................................. 11
4. Project Understanding, Approach, and Project Management ..................... 12
5. Appendix....................................................................................................... A-1 Resumes
Sample Project Schedules
Project Management – Sample Monthly Progress Report
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● ii
A. COVER LETTER AND MEMORANDA
March 11, 2024
Beshoy Demyan, PE, Senior Engineer
City of Manteca – Engineering Department
1001 West Center Street, Suite E
Manteca, CA 95337
RE: Proposal for On-Call Grant Research, Writing, Management Services Dear Mr. Demyan and Members of the Selection Panel:
The City of Manteca (City) is seeking a qualified consultant to assist in researching, developing, writing, preparing, and submitting grant proposals for state and federal grants. Kimley-Horn has assembled a team who understands the importance of not just identifying the correct grants to maximize the funding available to the City, but also has the experience and knowledge to put together winning grant proposals. As you review our proposal, please keep in mind the key benefits our team will bring:
Grant Funding Success Throughout California. Kimley-Horn has diverse experience completing regional, state, and federal grant applications and securing grant funding for clients throughout California. Our team understands the deadlines, requirements, and scoring criteria for grants— we have a successful track record of assisting staff and maximizing funding opportunities. Kimley-Horn’s one profit center approach to projects allows us to tap into a wide variety of resources depending on your needs and types of funding sources. Kimley-Horn’s grant writing teams have helped our clients in California secure more than $1 billion over the past few years through various programs including the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Bridge Investment Program (BIP), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Discretionary Grant, Clean CA Program, Safe Streets for All (SS4A), and more.
Local Work in Manteca. In addition to partnering with the City on its Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), we are currently working with the City on Manteca’s Fiber Master Plan. Throughout our partnership, we have developed strong working relationships with City staff as well as gained a solid understanding of City procedures and goals. Kimley-Horn’s local knowledge lessens our learning curve and allows us to hit the ground running on City projects.
Unmatched Experience Backed by In-House Multidisciplinary Resources. Kimley-Horn can offer a multidisciplinary team to bring the right skills and services for your as-needed projects. Our project manager, Molly Tremblay, has nine years of transportation and grant writing experience for agencies in Northern California—including the Cities of Seaside, King City, Monterey, and Salinas. In fact, Molly has secured more than $70 million over the last three years for clients throughout California. Molly will be supported by Alyssa Phaneuf, P.E., a grant specialist with more than 25 years of experience completing important transportation and grant writing projects. Molly will also have the support of a dedicated team of engineers, planners, and analysts with experience in fields ranging from traffic engineering and transportation planning to green infrastructure, traffic studies and analysis, and public outreach.
Proven Approach to Getting Projects Funded. Kimley-Horn has provided similar services for municipalities and agencies across California, and we have developed an approach that has led to many successful grant applications. Our approach to grant assistance involves: (1) identifying City funding needs, (2) tracking grant opportunities, (3) prioritizing grant opportunities with the City, (4) preparing the grant application, and (5) managing the grant program. Our approach to developing the grant application itself is tailored to the grant and the evaluation criteria, using data metrics to support a story for why the project deserves funding. We develop a workplan that aligns to the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) with clear roles and responsibilities for team members and project partners. The City will benefit from this tried-and-true approach, resulting in the successful delivery of assignments issued from this contract.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal and look forward to continuing our partnership with the City. If you have any questions, please reach out to our project manager and point of contact Molly Tremblay at 619.272.7191, [email protected], or at the address listed above. The signature of Frederik Venter below attests that the information in this proposal is true and correct to the best of our knowledge.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Frederik Venter, P.E. Molly Tremblay
Principal-in-Charge and Vice President with signing authority Project Manager Kimley-Horn requests that the City evaluates the submitted proposal. We acknowledge all Q&A publications associated with this RFP. 555 Capitol Mall
Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
TEL 916 858 5800
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 1
B. CONTRACT TERMINATION
CIRCUMSTANCES
Kimley-Horn has never been terminated for cause or default. We do not track terminations for convenience.
C. TECHNICAL CONTENT
C.1. Qualifications, Related Experience,
and References
Firm Profile
Founded in 1967, Kimley-Horn has grown from a small group of traffic engineers and transportation planners to a firm of more than 7,500 employees in 127 offices nationwide (a list of office locations is available at www.kimley-horn.com). Today, we are recognized as one of the nation’s largest engineering, planning, and environmental consulting firms. Kimley-Horn’s continued growth and stability is the direct result of our firm’s commitment to integrity and dedication to providing quality services. In 2023, Engineering News-Record ranked Kimley-Horn 9th out of the top 500 U.S. design firms. Our clients receive the local knowledge and responsiveness of a small organization, backed by the depth of resources of a national firm.
We are a privately held corporation, fully owned and operated by individuals who are current employees of the firm. Kimley-Horn is divided into eight geographic regions. Each region is managed by a team of representatives from production, marketing, administration, and practice building. Setting overall direction and policy is the firmwide management committee—also composed of
representatives from production, marketing, administration, and practice building—which assists the regional teams, as needed. The primary responsibility of the regional teams is to support our project managers, who are responsible for every facet of a project from beginning to end.
Current Financial Condition
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is a full-service engineering and consulting firm with offices in 29 states and Puerto Rico. The Company had 2022 revenues of $2.0 billion. Kimley-Horn has been in business since 1967. We are financially strong, and we are committed to our continued financial health. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had total assets of $1.2 billion and
stockholder’s equity of approximately $266 million. There are no current conditions that may impede our ability to complete the project. We maintain a disciplined focus on business fundamentals, operate the firm conservatively, and our internal controls and business standards are designed to keep our foundation strong. For any questions regarding Kimley-Horn’s financial status, please contact Lindsey Balltzglier, Controller, at (919) 678-4141.
Recent Similar Experience
Kimley-Horn has decades of experience identifying and preparing federal and state grants for municipal projects throughout California and across the country. We have provided grant assistance for a variety of grant programs all the way through to project completion within the grant guidelines resulting in more than $1 billion in awards for California clients over the last 10 years.
Our grant services include:
• Research • Data analysis and visualization
• Conceptual design • Technical writing and editing
• Benefit cost analysis • Graphic design and publishing • Cost estimating • Grant administration
• Program strategy and project
prioritization
Copies of the following successful grants can be downloaded at the following link:
https://kimley-horn.securevdr.com/public/share/web-s37bec947c35049f6a71dd86a1efecbd8 • City of Seaside ATP
• City of King City ATP
• City of Roseville HSIP
• City of South San Francisco HSIP
• SS4A Excerpts
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 2
Funded Grants
City of Seaside, Broadway Ave Complete Street Corridor, Seaside, CA
Kimley-Horn partnered with the City of Seaside and TAMC to complete a Citywide ICE Report and assist with an ATP Grant Application. Kimley-Horn worked with the City to prepare concept layouts and renderings along Broadway Avenue as part of the ATP grant application effort by TAMC. Kimley-Horn completed the Engineer’s Checklist for the ATP application, including vicinity map/location maps, project layouts, typical cross-sections, detailed engineer’s estimate, review of crash/safety data, collision maps and countermeasures, project schedule and funding request, warrant studies/guidance, review/prepare documentation of engineering decisions, and review of final application. The project was awarded $11 million for infrastructure costs and $1 million for non-infrastructure costs in ATP Cycle 5.
In closely working with the City staff to complete the ICE report and assist with the ATP grant application, Kimley-Horn developed a deep understanding of the City’s required scope of services prior to the PA&ED and PS&E phases. Likewise, close coordination with the City and the community was necessary to manage expectations and finalize the scope. One of the most challenging aspects of this project was gaining community consensus regarding the use of roundabouts. As part of the community outreach process, we worked to gain community input and buy-in for these roundabout designs by arranging additional one-on-one meetings with the community to explain the safety benefits of roundabouts.
Requested and Awarded: $12,041,000
Funding Source: ATP
Key Staff: Molly Tremblay (Grant Writer and Analyst); Sean Houck (Project Manager)
City of Salinas, Williams Road Safe Street Corridor Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Cycle 2 Grant Application, Salinas, CA Kimley-Horn partnered with the City of Salinas to complete an ICE Report and assist with a Cycle 2 SS4A Grant Application. Based on the success of the roundabouts at Bardin Elementary School, the City approached Kimley-Horn to analyze a roundabout at the
Williams/Alisal intersection. Our team brainstormed a few ideas and ultimately decided pursue HSIP funding for the project, knowing that Caltrans had recently updated their Benefit Cost calculator to show greater returns for roundabouts. Over the course of two HSIP cycles, our team evaluated several alternatives with multiple options for countermeasures, however the Benefit-Cost ratio and number of collisions was not enough to secure funding.
When the new SS4A program was released, we pivoted our
approach as the program gave us the opportunity to expand the project rather than whittle it down to service a better Benefit-Cost.
Our team worked with the City to envision a new corridor that included the original 2 roundabouts now with a road diet and protected bike paths, and a third roundabout with medians and striping improvements in front of Salinas High School. This is a prime example of tailoring a project to meet the goals of specific grant programs, as well as the importance of
understanding your needs and goals as a City which allows ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 3
us to work together the create the most competitive projects and applications.
Kimley-Horn worked with the City to prepare concept layouts along Williams Road from Alisal Road to Freedom Parkway as part of the SS4A grant application. Kimley-Horn also completed an ICE and benefit-cost analysis for three roundabouts, as well as vicinity map/location maps, project layouts, collision and countermeasure exhibits, typical cross-sections, detailed engineer’s estimate, review of crash/safety data, , project schedule and funding request, and review of final application. The project was awarded $16 million for construction costs.
Requested and Awarded: $16,000,000
Funding Source: Safe Streets for All (SS4A)
Key Staff: Molly Tremblay (Grant Writer and Analyst); Sean Houck (Project Manager)
County of Santa Cruz, Clean CA Local Grant Program,
Watsonville, CA
Kimley-Horn prepared a Clean CA Local Grant Program (CCLGP) grant application for the Green Valley Road Improvements Project.
Our team worked with the County to envision a new corridor that included lane width reductions, green street elements for stormwater treatment, native landscape, public artwork, upgraded transit stops, and protected bike paths As part of the application, our team completed the Application Form, Project Narrative, Letters of Support, Scope of Work, Cost, and Schedule (Infrastructure & Non-infrastructure); documented Site Photos; and prepared Project Location Maps, Cost Estimates, Project Fact Sheet, Local Match Calculation, Population Benefit, and Population Benefit to Underserved Communities forms.
Requested and Awarded: $11,043,00 (statewide funds)
Funding Source: Clean CA Local Grant Program (CCLGP)
Key Staff: Molly Tremblay (Grant Writer)
County of San Mateo, Santa Cruz Avenue Complete Street
Project, Alameda de Las Pulgas Complete Street Project, and Alpine Road Corridor Improvement Project
2023 San Mateo County Transportation Authority Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Grant Applications (3), Unincorporated San Mateo, CA
Kimley-Horn partnered with the County of San Mateo to complete the PA&ED and PS&E for the Alameda de Las Pulgas Complete Street Project and Corridor Study for the Alpine Road Corridor Improvements Project. Kimley-Horn completed San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA) Pedestrian and Bicycle Program (TA PBP) Grant Applications for each project. As part of the applications, our team completed the respective Application Forms, Cover Letters, Letters of Support & Community Engagement Documentation; documented Site Photos; and prepared Project Location Maps, GHG Emission Reduction and VMT Impact, Cost Estimates, and TIMS ATP Maps and Summary Data compilation.
Requested and Awarded: $4,990,000 (total for all projects) Funding Source: Transit Authority Pedestrian & Bicycle Program Key Staff: Molly Tremblay (Project Manager and Grant Writer) King City, Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) & ATP Cycle 6 Grant Applications Assistance, King City, CA Kimley-Horn prepared RSTP grants for the U.S. 101 and San Antonio Drive Roundabout Improvements Project and the Division Street Bike Lanes Project Quick-Build Project. Our team produced a detailed benefit/cost analysis and further worked with the City of King City to be consistent with the Transportation Agency of Monterey County's (TAMC's) published guidelines. We also partnered with King City and TAMC to complete several site-specific Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) studies and assist with an ATP grant application for the San Antonio Path and Safe Routes to School (SRTS) project. We worked with King City to evaluate previous, unsuccessful grant applications and revise both the project approach and narratives to create a successful application. The project was awarded $10 million for infrastructure costs and $1 million for non-infrastructure costs in ATP Cycle 6.
Requested and Awarded: $11,000,000
Funding Source: Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Key Staff: Molly Tremblay (Grant Writer)
City of Santa Ana, Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program, Santa Ana, CA
Kimley-Horn provided the City of Santa Ana with engineering services for the development of the Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) for the City’s bridge inventory. This included acquiring and reviewing the latest Bridge Inspection Reports, and the summary-recommendations from these reports. Preparing a work plan and ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 4
schedule for the site visit to city identified bridges in the city’s inventory. Documenting the condition of the bridges verses what was identified in the inspection reports to identify funding eligible repairs.
Kimley-Horn prepared estimates for the eligible work and the preparation of the Caltrans BPMP Plan that follows the “Bridge Preventive Guidelines for Local Agencies” for the city’s submittal to Caltrans, in order to secure funding for the maintenance work identified.
Requested and Awarded: $1,837,143 requested; $1,716,000 awarded
Funding Source: Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program
Key Staff: Andy Sanford (Project Manager)
City of South San Francisco, Local Road Safety Plan and HSIP Grant Support, South San Francisco, CA
Kimley-Horn developed a Local Road Safety Plan for the City of South San Francisco that identified the trends and patterns for traffic collisions in the City. The Kimley-Horn team worked with representatives and stakeholders from various City departments (including Engineering, Public Works, and Planning), Police Department, Fire Department, San Mateo County Office of Education, and the Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) in development of the Plan. Kimley-Horn supported the City with preparing a Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant application which included new traffic signal at Junipero Serra Blvd/Arroyo Wy, traffic signal modifications to implement Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) at three Grand Ave signals between Spuce Ave and Linden Ave, and citywide systemic signalized intersection improvements at 64 locations.
Requested and Awarded: $1.7 million
Funding Source: Highway Safety Improvement Program
Key Staff: Robert Paderna (Project Manager), Zach Ramalingam Experience Working with Government Agencies
Obtaining successful funding and identifying potential public and private sources is critical to many of our clients’ projects. Our team possesses a wealth of funding and technical expertise that allows us to help our clients identify grant programs and analyze competitiveness.
We have assisted numerous California municipalities in securing federal and state grant funds for public safety agencies, infrastructure improvements, parks, recreation, technology, community development, and capital assets. More specifically, we have a long-standing track record of securing funding from programs administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), California Transportation Commission (CTC), Caltrans, Los Angeles Metro (Metro), Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and regional MPOs in California and throughout the United States. We have submitted numerous applications for state and federal agency grant programs including the following:
• CA Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP)
• CA Active Transportation Program (ATP)
• CA Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program
• California Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Project (CALeVIP) 2.0 • CA Local Partnership Program (LPP)
• CA Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP)
• CA SB1 – The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 • CA Transportation Commission (CTC) Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP) SCCP Grants
• CA Urban Greening Grant Program
• Caltrans Sustainable Communities
• Clean Water State Revolving Loan Fund
• Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC)
• FHWA Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
• Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA)
• Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM)
• National Disaster Resilience Competition
• Regional Early Action Planning (REAP)
• Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE)
• Safe Streets for All (SS4A)
• USDOT Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment (ATCMTD) Grant
• US EPA Green Infrastructure Programs
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Disaster Recovery (DR) and Mitigation (MIT)
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Water and Waste Disposal Loan and Grant Program
In the table on the following page, we have listed a sampling of our experience in the preparation and submission of grants for municipalities throughout California, including the applicant, the amount awarded, project name, and type of grant as applicable.
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 5
Awarded Grants in California
Applicant Amount Awarded Project (Grant Type if applicable) Santa Barbara County
Association of
Governments (SBCAG)
$187,700,000 U.S. 101 Multimodal Hybrid Corridor (SB1)
City of Salinas $1,800,000 Bardin Road (RSTP)
City of Monterey $6,500,000 North Fremont Street Between Canyon del Rey/SR 218 and Casa Verde Way (ATP) City of Monterey $200,000 SS4A Complete Action Plan Grant to City of Monterey, California City of Seaside $12,041,000 Broadway Avenue Complete Street Corridor (ATP) City of Seaside $600,000 Broadway Avenue Complete Street Corridor (RSTP) City of Fresno $35,000,000 Blackstone and Ventura/Kings Canyon Bus Rapid Transit System (FTA Very Small Starts Grant)
City of San Jose $3,100,000 Beautiful Way Streetscape and Pedestrian Improvements (MTC Transportation for Livable Communities Capital Grant)
City of San Jose $2,500,000 Silicon Valley ITS West Corridor Project City of San Leandro $4,600,000 West Estudillo Streetscape and Bay Area Regional Transit (BART) Downtown Connections (MTC Transportation for Livable Communities Capital Grant) Santa Clara County
Transportation Authority
$1,500,000 BART Extension, Phase 2 (FTA Pilot Program for Transit Oriented Development Grant)
Santa Clara County
Transportation Authority
$840,000 Montague Expressway Pedestrian Overcrossing (One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2) Alameda CTC $25,000,000 Alameda SMART Corridors Program Project Alameda Congestion
Management Agency
(CMA)
$6,000,000 East Bay SMART Corridor Project (Prop 1B, CMIA) San Mateo Transit District $1,100,000 Grand Boulevard: Removing Barriers to Livable Communities (TIGER II Planning Grant)
MTC $3,500,000 MTC Clipper Program Enhancements (Transit Capital Enhancements Grant) MTC $3,100,000 MTC Clipper Program Enhancements (Transit Capital Enhancements Grants) Capital SouthEast
Connector Joint Powers
Authority
$25,000,000 Capital SouthEast Connector Segment D3/E1 (LPP) City of Folsom $500,000 Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Community Design Grants City of Goleta $3,120,000 Signal System Upgrades (HSIP Cycle 10) County of Ventura $999,990 County of Ventura, Set-Aside for Guardrail Upgrades (HSIP Cycle 11) County of Ventura $3,844,700 Edgelines and Rumble Strips Implementation (HSIP Cycle 10) County of Ventura $1,000,000 Guardrail Implementation (HSIP Cycle 10) County of Ventura $250,000 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons for Pedestrian Crossings (HSIP Cycle 10) County of Ventura $4,905,300 Traffic Signal System Upgrades (HSIP Cycle 10) City of Malibu $500,000 IRWM Grant
City of Santa Clarita $5,000,000 Santa Clarita ITS Phases I to VII (LA Metro Grant) ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 6
Applicant Amount Awarded Project (Grant Type if applicable) City of Lancaster $1,363,500 Reflective Backplates (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Lancaster $1,690,650 Enhance Visibility at Stop-Controlled Intersections (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Lancaster $2,349,000 Additional Intersection Lighting (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Lancaster $377,460 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Lancaster $19,652,736 Equitable Complete Streets for Challenger Way Corridor (SS4A Grant) City of Palmdale $5,857,520 City of Palmdale Signal Modernization Project (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Arcadia $470,000 Transit Signal Priority and Pedestrian Signal (Net Toll Grant) City of Monterey Park $900,000 Monterey Park Vision Zero Action Plan (SS4A Grant) City of Maywood $1,418,490 Maywood Atlantic and Slauson Safety Project (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Cudahy $1,217,790 Citywide Signal Improvements (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Artesia $209,430 Pedestrian Enhancement in the City of Artesia (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Artesia $225,000 Bicyclist Enhancement in the City of Artesia (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Seal Beach $200,000 City of Seal Beach Safety Action Plan (SS4A Grant) City of Costa Mesa $630,472 City of Costa Mesa Safe Routes to School Action Plan (SS4A Grant) City of Barstow $6,066,153 North 1st Avenue Bridge (Caltrans Highway Bridge Program Grant) City of Victorville $660,000 CALeVIP Golden State Priority Project City of Riverside $7,815,420 Citywide Signal Improvements and Mission Inn Avenue Median Project (HSIP Cycle 11)
City of Moreno Valley $300,000 CALeVIP Golden State Priority Project City of Menifee $1,555,704 City of Menifee Systemic Signal Safety Improvement (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Desert Hot Springs $561,150 Desert Hot Springs Citywide Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project (HSIP Cycle 11) City of Palm Desert $720,000 Palm Desert Vision Zero Strategy Action Plan (SS4A Grant) City of Carlsbad $1,119,000 Avenida Encinas Coastal Rail Trail and Pedestrian Improvements (ATP) City of Poway $250,000 Poway Four Signals (Hazard Elimination System [HES] Grant) City of La Mesa $630,000 Fletcher Parkway
City of La Mesa $2,300,000 Grossmont Center Drive (HBRRP) City of La Mesa $940,000 King Street Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements City of La Mesa $502,000 University Avenue Corridor Bike Network and Pedestrian Improvements (SANDAG ATGP)
City of National City $1,286,000 Central Community Mobility Enhancements (ATP Cycle 4) City of National City $2,000,000 Downtown-Westside Connector (SANDAG SGIP) City of National City $1,865,000 El Toyon-Las Palmas Bicycle Corridor (ATP) City of National City $3,385,870 Euclid Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements (ATP Cycles 1 and 3) City of National City $1,870,000 Paradise Creek Restoration (Proposition 84 Grant) City of National City $2,080,000 Roosevelt Avenue Smart Growth (SANDAG ATGP and SGIP) City of National City $5,185,000 Roosevelt Avenue Pedestrian and Bike (ATP Cycle 4) ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 7
Applicant Amount Awarded Project (Grant Type if applicable) City of National City $1,000,000 Sweetwater River Bikeway/30th Street Bicycle Facility Improvements (SANDAG ATGP and SGIP)
SANDAG $9,500,000 ATCMTD Grant
San Diego Zoo Safari Park $2,900,000 Safari Park Irrigation Backbone System Upgrade (Proposition 84 Grant) City of Brawley $16,500,000 Downtown Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections (ATP Cycle 2) City of Calexico $140,000 Calexico Street Light Replacement (EECBG) References for Similar Work
Kimley-Horn has effectively completed numerous grant-related projects for public sector clients across California. Additionally, we have highlighted some of our completed recent projects that demonstrate our experience with this contract’s services in the prior section titled “Recent Similar Experience.”
References for selected projects are provided below:
City of Seaside, Broadway Ave Complete Street Corridor
Kimley-Horn partnered with the City of Seaside and TAMC to complete a Citywide ICE Report and assist with an ATP Grant Application. Kimley-Horn worked with the City to prepare concept layouts and renderings along Broadway Avenue as part of the ATP grant application effort by TAMC. The project was awarded $11 million for infrastructure costs and $1 million for non-infrastructure costs in ATP Cycle 5.
Client Contact: Leslie Llantero | 4400 Harcourt Avenue, Seaside, CA 93955 | 831.899.6885 City of King City, Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) and ATP Cycle 6 Grant Applications Assistance Kimley-Horn prepared RSTP grants for the U.S. 101 and San Antonio Drive Roundabout Improvements Project and the Division Street Bike Lanes Project Quick-Build Project. Our team produced a detailed benefit/cost analysis and further worked with the City of King City to be consistent with the Transportation Agency of Monterey County's (TAMC's) published guidelines.
Client Contact: Octavio Hurtado, Public Works Director | 212 South Vanderhurst Avenue, King City, CA 93930 | 831.385.3281 City of Salinas, Williams Road Safe Street Corridor Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Cycle 2 Grant Application Kimley-Horn partnered with the City of Salinas to complete an ICE Report and assist with a Cycle 2 SS4A Grant Application. Kimley-Horn completed a Regional Surface Transportation Program Grant for the Bardin SRTS Improvements Project and produced a detailed benefit/cost analysis to help ensure consistency with the Transportation Agency of Monterey County’s published guidelines.
Client Contact: Adriana Robles, City Engineer | 200 Lincoln Avenue, Salinas, CA 93901 | 831.758.7194 Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC), Broadway Avenue ATP Grant Kimley-Horn partnered with TAMC to complete the Broadway Avenue ATP Grant application. Kimley-Horn completed the infrastructure portions, while TAMC led the non-infrastructure and narrative efforts.
Client Contact: Ariana Green, Principal Transportation Planner | 55-B Plaza Circle, Salinas, CA 93901 | 831.775.4403 City of Santa Ana, Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program Kimley-Horn provided the City of Santa Ana with engineering services for the development of the Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) for the City’s bridge inventory. We documented the condition of the bridges verses what was identified in the inspection reports to identify funding eligible repairs, and prepared estimates for the eligible work for the preparation of the Caltrans BPMP Plan for the city’s submittal to Caltrans, in order to secure funding.
Client Contact: Mindy Ly | 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92702 | 714.647.5665 City of South San Francisco, Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) and HSIP Grant Kimley-Horn developed a Local Road Safety Plan for the City of South San Francisco that identified the trends and patterns for traffic collisions in the City. Kimley-Horn also supported the City with preparing a Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant application which included new traffic signal at Junipero Serra Blvd/Arroyo Wy, traffic signal modifications to implement Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) at three Grand Ave signals between Spuce Ave and Linden Ave, and citywide systemic signalized intersection improvements at 64 locations.
Client Contact: Jeff Chou, Senior Engineer | 315 Maple Avenue | South San Francisco, CA 94080 | 650.829.6668 ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 8
C.2. Proposed Staffing and Project Organization
Education, Experience, Professional Credentials of Key Staff Please refer to the resumes in section C.5 for the education, experience, and applicable professional credentials of our key project staff.
Key Staff Resumes
Resumes for key project staff are provided section C.5.
Key Personnel Summary
Name / Current Location /
Tenure with Kimley-Horn
Proposed Project Roles Current Assignments and
Level of Commitment
Availability for
Manteca On-Call
Molly Tremblay
Sacramento
5 Years with Kimley-Horn
Project Manager; Safe
Routes to Schools; Grant
Narrative Preparation &
Review; Grant Reporting &
Funding Procurement;
Community Engagement
Seaside, Broadway Complete Street Corridor –
25%
King City, San Antonio SRTS & Multiuse Trail– 20%
Salinas, Williams Road SS4A PA&ED – 20%
ATP Grant Applications – 10%
25%
Frederik Venter, P.E.
San Jose
14 Years with Kimley-Horn
Principal-in-Charge;
Multimodal Analysis &
Design; Safe Routes to
Schools; Before & After
Studies
Seaside, Broadway Ave Corridor SRTS and Road
Diet – 10%
Salinas General Plan Circulation Element – 15%
Marina, Roadway Multimodal and Safety – 10%
Miscellaneous – 25%
40%
Robert Paderna, P.E., RSP1
Sacramento
13 Years with Kimley-Horn
City of Manteca
Coordination; Signal Design;
Traffic Safety; Data
Collection & Traffic
Operations
Rocklin Local Road Safety Plan Update – 15%
Milpitas SS4A Grant Support – 10%
CCTA Countywide Transportation Safety Action Plan
– 15%
Citrus Heights Roseville Rd/Butternut Dr HSIP
Design – 10%
Other On-Call Task Orders – 10%
40%
Ali Mustafa, EIT, PTP, RSP1
San Jose
6 Years with Kimley-Horn
City of Manteca
Coordination
Breakers FC Traffic Study – 30 %
Hollister General Plan Update – 15%
Salinas General Plan Update – 15%
Good Samaritan Hospital Transportation Analysis –
10%
Buena Vista Landfill – 10%
20%
Alyssa Phaneuf, P.E.
Los Angeles
18 Years with Kimley-Horn
QC/QA; Grant Narrative
Preparation & Review; Grant
Reporting & Funding
Procurement; Equity &
Social Data Analysis
SBCAG Grant Writing – 10%
SANDAG – 20%
Miscellaneous Grants – 10%
60%
Daniel Carley, P.E.
Sacramento
18 Years with Kimley-Horn
Roadway & Active
Transportation Design
Imjin Pkwy Widening Construction Support – 10%
Clarksburg Branch Trail PS&E – 10%
Lampasas Intersection Improvements – 10%
Anderson Rd Streetscape Project – 10%
Miscellaneous Civil Design Projects – 40%
20%
John Pulliam, P.E.
San Mateo
11 Years with Kimley-Horn
Roadway & Active
Transportation Design
Vine Trail, Yountville to Saint Helena – 40%
Bascom Avenue Complete Streets – 5%
Burlingame On-Call – 10%
San Benito County On-Call – 10%
35%
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 9
Name / Current Location /
Tenure with Kimley-Horn
Proposed Project Roles Current Assignments and
Level of Commitment
Availability for
Manteca On-Call
Sean Houck, P.E.
Sacramento
8 Years with Kimley-Horn
Intersection Control
Evaluations & Benefit-Cost
Analysis; Before & After
Studies
Seaside Broadway CSC – 15%
King City CSC – 10%
Salinas – Williams Road – 10%
RTC Washoe Roundabouts – 10%
City of Folsom Roundabout Policy – 10%
City of Lincoln Ferrari Ranch Road - 10%
35%
Chris Gregerson, P.E., T.E., PTOE,
PTP, AICP
Sacramento
9 Years with Kimley-Horn
Data Collection & Traffic
Operations
Concord TIF Update – 10%
SLOCOG VMT Mitigation Program – 20%
City of Sacramento Traffic Study On-Call – 20%
50%
Andy Sanford, P.E.
San Diego
6 Years with Kimley-Horn
Structural Engineering and
Bridge Design
Carr Avenue – 10 %
Cienega Road – 10%
Panoche Scour – 5%
5600 S – 20%
Miscellaneous Projects – 10%
45%
Brandi Childress
San Jose
1.5 Years with Kimley-Horn
Community Engagement;
Equity & Social Data
Analysis
Renewable Energy Community/Grant Programs,
Marin Clean Energy – 20%
Political/Funding Strategy for Corridor Crossing
Program, Caltrain – 20%
Public Outreach and Community Engagement, San
Mateo County Transportation Authority – 10%
30%
Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP,
RSP2B
Los Angeles
6 Years with Kimley-Horn
Equity & Social Data
Analysis
Project Monterey Safety Action Plan – 25%
SJCOG Congestion Management Plan – 10%
Bakersfield SS4A Grant Support – 15%
Rialto Safety Action Plan – 20%
30%
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 10
Organization Chart
Key Personnel Statement
The key personnel identified in this proposal will be available to the extent proposed for the duration of possible projects. No person designated as "key" to the project shall be removed or replaced without the prior written approval from the City.
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 11
C.3. Hourly Rates
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Hourly Labor Rate Schedule
Classification Rate
Analyst I $130 - $165
Analyst II $170 - $200
Professional $200 - $245
Senior Professional I $245 - $335
Senior Professional II $340 - $395
Senior Technical Support $115 - $290
Technical Support $105 - $165
Support Staff $85 - $145
Effective through June 30, 2025.
Subject to annual adjustment thereafter.
External Reimbursable Expenses will be charged at 10% mark-up, or per the Contract.
Sub-Consultants will be billed at 10% mark-up, or per the Contract.
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 12
C.4. Project Understanding, Approach,
and Project Management
Project Understanding
We understand that a successful grant application can comprise of a multitude of elements and services, and we can provide a full range of customizable support (illustrated by the figure to the right) based on your needs. We can support specific areas of grant development, like benefit cost analysis or GIS mapping, or we can provide support from the beginning (i.e., project concept development) through grant application development and submittal.
Kimley-Horn’s focus on on-call grant writing contracts is to provide high quality and responsive professional services to our clients. Our goal is to respond to the City’s requests quickly and efficiently.
Through virtual video meetings, calls, messages, and/or in-person meetings, we will not only be able to keep things moving on a grant, but we will also be available to meet with City staff at a moment’s notice if something critical needs to be discussed. We have found success over the years through establishing ongoing coordination meetings with key City staff and funding partners to keep action items and discussion of issues front and center. After every meeting, we will send follow-up emails clearly documenting all action items and outstanding coordination items.
Approach to Successful Grant Applications
Our approach to preparing grant applications is based on the approach we have been using with other public agencies, which is shown in the flow chart below. It is an iterative and cyclical process because priorities and opportunities are always changing.
Identifying Grants
We will meet with the City on a monthly basis to determine the funding needs. This may include meetings with individual City departments accompanied by a shared spreadsheet that each department can update as needs arise. This allows us to focus our search and look for opportunities before Notice of Funding Opportunities (NOFOs) are released. Our breadth and depth of experience—and insights gained through our participation in debrief sessions—have provided us proven strategies to position the City for success. These strategies which will be tailored to the City’s needs may include outreach initiatives, combining multiple project elements, or collecting specific types of data to advance the need.
We will provide monthly grant tracking updates for the priority projects that the City has identified. As grant opportunities present themselves, we will provide an assessment of competitiveness for the grant, scope, schedule, and level of effort for the City. This grant tracking will be provided for a lump sum fee. We will provide a fee estimate for each grant application, as they vary widely in terms of level of effort and stakeholder coordination.
Grant Writing Process
The response time for funding or financing programs is typically short. Kimley-Horn is familiar with funding cycles, and we regularly track draft guidelines and other critical information circulated in advance of the NOFO. Our team will be ready to mobilize quickly and proceed with a sense of urgency upon release of a NOFO. We have developed a solid project management methodology founded upon our commitment to high-quality deliverables. We will serve as an extension of your staff, developing and maintaining clear, continuous communication throughout the project to maintain high standards of quality from a task’s inception to its completion. Our grant writing process is based on the following fundamentals:
• Develop a clear understanding of the project objectives and the City’s needs
• Develop a comprehensive work plan and schedule to accomplish objectives
• Set weekly milestones that support larger milestones
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 13
• Review milestones with the project team on a weekly basis • Involve stakeholders as integral members of the team
• Coordinate with other consultants
• Create an atmosphere that encourages clear communications and teamwork
We begin each grant with a detailed work plan which includes due dates, assignments, and schedule for City decisions and reviews. We have a dedicated team for each grant that utilizes the specific expertise required, be it our landscape architecture team, environmental planners, or any of our other exceptional teams of disciplinary specialists.
Our process is customized to the grant and your needs. We can draft letters of support; perform outreach in multiple languages; and demonstrate our vast technical experience in drafting conceptual plans, providing cost estimates, and developing project narratives.
Public Outreach
Demonstrating community support continues to be one of the most important elements of a grant application for grant administrators.
Alignment between community organizations, peer agencies, the applicant, and the funding program demonstrates two key factors for the grant administrator: the applicant project (1) meets the needs of the community; and (2) the collective investment of achieving successful outcomes for project stakeholders.
Our team is sensitive to the pivotal role of meaningful public engagement programs that enable area residents to communicate and assist with the realization of their collective priorities. Public engagement determines the overall design program, funding strategies, and implementation priorities. Kimley-Horn is known for developing innovative approaches to projects that involve meaningful and productive public engagement. Accordingly, we have developed effective methods of bringing the community into the process. We are strongly committed to conducting public participation programs that educate, inform, and build consensus for a particular solution.
We also have professionals on staff who are native Spanish speakers experienced in conducting bilingual outreach services.
We will work closely with the City to identify key stakeholders and Community Based Organizations (CBOs) and work with them in preparation of the grant. Our team develops a robust documentation of the engagement process, meeting documentation, and letters of support from the community at all levels. In many cases, this results in a more successful project for funding while also meeting the needs of the community.
Creative Storytelling Through Datasets
Compelling narratives and storytelling are important to preparing successful grant applications—our team is well-versed in gleaning data-supported narratives from datasets. Our engineers, planners, environmental specialists, and marketing professionals collaborate to develop narratives that are engaging and easy to understand for community groups, stakeholders, and grant administrators.
Project Management
The Kimley-Horn team recognizes the importance of having a robust project control system in place. We utilize processes at two levels:
contract and task order/project levels. This is important for the City because we may have multiple grant activities moving forward concurrently. We want to make sure we are effectively using your resources and providing direct communication on progress.
Contract Level
Molly is responsible for our team’s overall performance and has the authority and tools to help assure that task orders are on time and within budget. Two key project management tools include:
• Resource Planning: A weekly, monthly, three-month, and six-month internal workload forecast system utilized on a firmwide basis that forecasts workload and identifies key resources required for successful project delivery. The constant review of the firmwide database allows our project manager and task order managers to verify that staff resources are properly allocated to meet our clients’ schedules and expectations.
• Document Control: We utilize a document control system in which electronic copies of project deliverables and significant project communications are filed and tracked by project number and key words. Our staff is trained on our project control protocols on a regular basis to promote consistency in project documentation for each project and task. Our streamlined electronic filing system includes records of meetings and data shared; documentation of design decisions; and data collected and/or provided by others, allowing us to quickly locate project records and respond to your requests.
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 14
Task Order/Project Level
Our task leads are responsible for project delivery, including quality, scope, budget, and schedule. We have a set of project specific tools in place that our task leads can utilize to manage schedule, costs, resource needs, and earned value as well as identify risks and communicate with the City in a timely manner.
• Budget and Expenditure Monitoring: Kimley-Horn’s
Management Information System (MIS) provides our task order managers with a set of project control tools to manage schedule, costs, earned value, and provide accurate billing in a manner that meets the City’s and cooperating agency requirements.
Additionally, Kimley-Horn utilizes daily electronic timesheets. This practice allows us to accurately track and bill our time; allows project/task order managers the ability to check progress daily; and maintains compliance with federal auditing requirements set by Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA).
• Risk Management: We take steps to anticipate, understand, and have a plan to successfully manage project risks, which has been a key to our team’s success. We are committed to
continuing to refine our project control process as projects and needs evolve.
Communication
Communication between our team and the City is critical to thoroughly understanding your goals and implementing solutions to achieve your vision. Effective communication begins with listening to your ideas, concerns, and goals for the contract as well as each task order. Making certain that our team and your staff are on the same page will help avoid or mitigate potential issues. To do this, we will:
• Keep you informed through progress meetings and progress reports
• Provide you with regular calls to keep you abreast of critical issues as they arise and assure your continued input throughout the process
As requested in the RFP, sample project schedules and a sample monthly project progress report are included in
section C.5.
Quality Control/Quality Assurance
Since our founding, Kimley-Horn has aggressively pursued a commitment to quality for every task, deliverable, and service we provide. Recognizing the importance of careful quality control, Kimley-Horn developed a quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) manual that every project manager is required to know and use. Our program is based on the philosophy that:
Quality is achieved by adequate planning, coordination, supervision, and technical direction; proper definition of the project requirements and procedures; understanding the scope of services; and the use of appropriately skilled personnel performing work functions carefully
Quality is controlled by assigning a manager to evaluate all work and procedures followed while providing the services
Quality is secured through the careful surveillance of work activities by individuals who are not directly responsible for performing the initial efforts
Quality is verified through independent reviews by a qualified staff member of the processes, procedures, documentation, supervision, technical direction, and staffing associated with the project development.
Our QC/QA program includes the review of project documents and supporting data—including documents and data provided by subconsultants—by our project managers, QC managers, and key staff who direct individual tasks. Our QC/QA program includes, but is not limited to, the following procedures:
• The project manager and QC manager will be thoroughly familiar with requirements and will have the authority to direct the project team
• An internal kick-off meeting will be held with key individuals, including necessary subconsultants, to clearly define the scope of services
• Project meetings and decisions will be documented by using a basis of design matrix
• Supporting calculations, text, or data used to develop a design plan or document will be signed and dated by the individual involved
• Team network review will be undertaken. Team network quality control is the day-to-day peer review that is undertaken by the project team. Technical documentation, analysis, and
correspondence is reviewed by a team member other than the individual or subconsultant preparing the documents and analyses ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-1
C.5. Appendix
This appendix section contains the following:
• Resumes
• Sample Project Schedules – Safe Streets and Roads For All (SS4A), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Bridge Investment Program Planning and Bridge Project Grants
• Project Management – Sample Monthly Progress Report
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-2
Molly Tremblay
Project Manager; Safe Routes to Schools; Grant Narrative Preparation & Review; Grant Reporting & Funding
Procurement; Community Engagement
Molly is a young professional with a passion for projects that benefit communities through safety, equity, and active transportation focused design. She has more than 10 years of experience in multidisciplinary municipal and transportation projects, as well as private site developments. Molly has excellent written and verbal communication skills, and a proclivity for communicating complex design issues to stakeholders and community members. Molly has leveraged this ability into a successful approach to grant writing through passionate storytelling backed by compelling data. Molly has led a variety of state and federal grant applications, winning more than $70M in grant funding over the last 3 years. Molly has been involved in all stages of grant-funded projects, from the initial studies to concept refinement and design and through to construction.
Molly has been involved in a range of projects including planning and final design of bikeways, bicycle and pedestrian facility intersection designs, complete streets, roundabouts, roadway alignments, curb extensions, accessibility upgrades, and parks. Her work with these projects includes intersection control evaluations, safety analysis, public outreach and community workshops, horizontal and vertical design, ADA accessible grading, wet and dry utility plans, and collaborating with clients and local agencies to develop innovative solutions that effectively address design challenges.
Relevant Experience
• City of West Sacramento, Grant Writing Services On-Call, West Sacramento County, CA – Project Manager • County of Sacramento, Grant Writing Services, Sacramento County, CA – Grant Specialist • City of Seaside, Broadway Ave Complete Street Corridor RSTP Grant Application, Seaside, CA – Analyst • City of Seaside, Coe Ave. and General Jim Moore Blvd. Intersection Improvements RSTP Grant Application, Seaside, CA – Project Analyst
• City of Salinas, Williams Road Safe Street Corridor Project Streets for All (SS4A) Cycle 2 Grant Application, Salinas, CA – Grant Writer
• City of King, US 101 & San Antonio Drive Roundabout Improvements Project 2023 RSTP Grant Application Assistance, King City, CA – Grant Writer
• City of King, Division Street Bike Lanes Project 2023 Quick-Build RSTP Grant Application Assistance, King City, CA – Grant Writer
• County of San Mateo, Santa Cruz Avenue Complete Street Project, Alameda de Las Pulgas Complete Street Project, and Alpine Road Corridor Improvement Project 2023 San Mateo County Transportation Authority Pedestrian & Bicycle Program Grant Applications (3), Unincorporated San Mateo, CA – Project Manager & Grant Writer • City of King, San Antonio Drive Path & Safe Routes to Schools ATP Cycle 6 Grant Application, King City, CA – Grant Writer • City of Salinas, Harden Parkway Path & Safe Routes to School Project ATP Cycle 6 Grant Application, Salinas, CA – Grant Writer • County of San Mateo, Santa Cruz Avenue & Alameda de Las Pulgas Improvement Project ATP Cycle 6 Grant Application (Regional & Statewide), Unincorporated San Mateo, CA – Project Manager & Grant Writer • City of Folsom, Folsom-Placerville Rail Trail Gap Closure (Regional & Statewide), Folsom, CA – Project Manager & Grant Writer • County of Santa Cruz, Clean CA Local Grant Program, Watsonville, CA – Grant Writer • City of Seaside, Broadway Ave Complete Street Corridor, Seaside, CA – Grant Writer • City of West Sacramento, Grant Writing Services On-Call, West Sacramento County, CA – Project Manager • County of Sacramento, Grant Writing Services, Sacramento County, CA – Grant Specialist • City of Seaside, Broadway Ave Complete Street Corridor RSTP Grant Application, Seaside, CA – Project Analyst • City of Salinas, Bardin Road RSTP Grant Application, Salinas, CA – Project Analyst Professional Credentials
• Bachelor of Science,
Structural Engineering,
University of California,
San Diego
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-3
Frederik Venter, P.E.
Principal-in-Charge; Multimodal Analysis & Design; Safe Routes to Schools; Before & After Studies
Frederik has 33 years of experience in the development of transportation and traffic engineering studies, including preparation of traffic studies, traffic impact assessments, SB 743/VMT implementation, and final design. He has also been responsible for transportation planning studies, comprehensive origin/destination surveys, parking demand surveys, pedestrian and bike facility planning, and community mobility studies. Frederik has led the design of road widening projects, intersection improvements, freeway on and off-ramps, traffic calming measures, and site circulation improvements.
Relevant Experience
• City of Seaside, Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE)/Broadway Active Transportation Program (ATP) Grant Services, Seaside, CA – Project Engineer
• City of Monterey, Multimodal Plan, Monterey, CA – Project Manager • City of Marina, LRSP, Marina, CA – Project Manager
• TAMC, Marina-Salinas Multimodal Corridor Plan, Monterey County, CA – Project Engineer • Monterey-Salinas Transit, Transit and Multimodal Design, Monterey, CA – Project Manager • City of Monterey, Casa Verde Rec Trail Crossing Study Project, Monterey, CA – Project Manager • TAMC, Marina-Salinas Multimodal Corridor Plan, Monterey County, CA – Project Engineer • TAMC, Monterey Bay Aquarium Transportation Demand Management Plan, Monterey, CA – Project Manager • TAMC, Canyon Del Rey Blvd (SR 218) Corridor Study, Salinas, CA – Project Manager • Monterey Institute of International Studies, Master Plan Update: Parking, Traffic and TDM Plan, Monterey, CA – Project Manager
• City of Burlingame, Carolan Avenue Complete Street, Burlingame, CA – Principal-in-Charge • City of Seaside, CSU Monterey Bay Master Plan Update, Seaside, CA –Project Manager • City of Marina, Imjin Parkway Corridor Concept Design, Marina, CA – QC/QA Engineer • City of Marina, Imjin Parkway/SR 1 Traffic Signal Design at Ramps, Marina, CA – Deputy Project Manager • City of Marina, On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Marina, CA – Project Engineer • City of Salinas, Comprehensive General Plan Update and Environmental Impact Report, Salinas, CA – Project Manager • City of Salinas, SB 743 Implementation and VMT Banking Plan, Salinas, CA – Project Manager • City of Tracy, Tracy Hills Specific Plan Amendment and Subsequent EIR, Tracy, CA – Project Engineer Professional Credentials
• Master of Science, Urban
Engineering, University of
Pretoria, South Africa
• Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, University of
Pretoria, South Africa
• Bachelor of Science,
Transportation Engineering,
University of Pretoria, South
Africa
• Professional Engineer in
California #64621
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-4
Robert Paderna, P.E., RSP1
City of Manteca Coordination; Signal Design; Traffic
Safety; Data Collection & Traffic Operations
Robert has more than 19 years of experience in transportation/traffic engineering. He has managed several safety projects including Local Road Safety Plans (LRSPs), Roadway Safety Signing Audits (RSSAs), Road Safety Audits (RSAs), and multimodal planning and design projects. He has also led projects involving signal timing and coordination, engineering and traffic surveys, preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) for traffic signals (new and modified), signing and striping, street and highway lighting, traffic operations systems/ITS, and traffic control. He is skilled in the application of California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) guidelines, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines, Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual (HDM) and Standard Plans, and industry best practices included in National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) publications.
Relevant Experience
• City of Manteca, Local Road Safety Plan, Manteca, CA – Project Manager • County of Sacramento, Grant Writing Services, Sacramento County, CA – Project Manager • City of Lincoln, Grant Application Support, Lincoln, CA – Project Manager • City of South San Francisco, Local Road Safety Plan and HSIP Grant Support, South San Francisco, CA – Project Manager • Stanislaus County, HSIP Grant for Design of Striping, Curve Assessments, and Signage, Modesto, CA – Project Manager • Stanislaus County, HSIP Grant for Design of Striping, Curve Assessments, and Signage, Stanislaus County, CA – Project Manager • City of Folsom, Safety Assessment of East Natoma Street and Blue Ravine Road, Folsom, CA – Project Engineer • City of West Sacramento, HSIP Cycle 9 Traffic Safety Improvements Project, West Sacramento, CA – Project Engineer • City of Elk Grove, Citywide Traffic Signal Enhancement and Congestion Relief Project, Elk Grove, CA – Project Engineer • City of Elk Grove, Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Design Project, Elk Grove, CA – Project Manager • City of Folsom, ITS Master Plan Implementation Project, Folsom, CA – Project Manager • City of Rocklin, Local Road Safety Plan, Rocklin, CA – Deputy Project Manager and QC/QA Manager • County of El Dorado, Local Roadway Safety Plan, El Dorado County, CA – Project Manager • City of Citrus Heights, Local Road Safety Plan, Citrus Heights, CA – Project Manager • City of Roseville, Local Road Safety Plan, Roseville, CA – Deputy Project Manager • County of Sutter, Local Road Safety Plan, Sutter County, CA – Project Manager • County of Nevada, Roadway Safety Signing Audit Program (Phases I and II), Nevada County, CA – Project Engineer • City of Watsonville, Citywide Signal Upgrade and Pedestrian Improvements, Watsonville, CA – Project Manager • County of Marin, Traffic Sign Inventory and RSSA, Marin County, CA – Project Engineer • Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC), I-80 ICM Signal Coordination Retiming on Incident Response Routes, Oakland, CA – Project Engineer
Professional Credentials
• Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, San Jose
State University
• Professional Engineer in
California #73262
• Road Safety Professional
Level 1 #553
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-5
Ali Mustafa, EIT, PTP, RSP1
City of Manteca Coordination
Ali has a professional background in engineering consulting that spans a wide array of projects for public agencies and private developers in California. With double Master’s degrees in Transportation Engineering and more than 25 years of transportation planning and traffic engineering experience, Ali has worked extensively on traffic impact studies/environmental impact reports (EIRs), general plans / specific plans, parking studies, transportation management plans, neighborhood traffic management plans, and planning/design of major sports facilities.
Relevant Experience
• City of Manteca, Local Road Safety Plan, Manteca, CA – Project Engineer • County of San Benito, Local Road Safety Plan, San Benito County, CA – Project Engineer • City of Monterey, Traffic Engineering Study, Monterey, CA – Project Engineer • Monterey 2031 EIR Phase 1, Monterey, CA – Project Engineer • County of Santa Cruz, Countywide Speed Study, Santa Cruz County, CA – Project Manager • County of Santa Cruz, Engineering and Traffic Survey Report, Santa Cruz County, CA – Project Manager • Santa Clara VTA, Cinnabar Grade Crossing, San Jose, CA – Project Engineer • County of Santa Cruz, GP Intersection Analysis, Santa Cruz, CA – Project Engineer • City of Marina, Cal State University-Monterey Bay Master Plan, Marina, CA – Project Engineer • City of Hollister, General Plan, Hollister, CA – Project Engineer • City of Hercules, Transportation Planning and Engineering Services to Support the Hercules Mobility Plan, Hercules, CA – Project Analyst
• City of San Mateo, Hillsdale Station Area Plan, San Mateo, CA – Project Analyst • Traffic Engineering Services for Gilead Sciences Campus Master Plan, Foster City, CA – Project Analyst • I-880 Transportation Management Plan (TMP), Oakland, CA – Project Analyst • WCCTAC, Updating Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance, Contra Costa County, CA – Project Analyst Professional Credentials
• Master of Science,
Transportation Engineering,
Illinois Institute of
Technology
• Master of Science,
Transportation Engineering,
Regional Engineering
College, India
• Bachelor of Engineering,
Civil Engineering, Osmania
University, A.P., India
• Engineer-in-Training in
California
• Professional Transportation
Planner #762
• Road Safety Professional 1
#887
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-6
Alyssa Phaneuf, P.E.
QC/QA; Grant Narrative Preparation & Review; Grant
Reporting & Funding Procurement; Equity & Social Data
Analysis
Alyssa has 25 years of experience in the transportation industry. She has the unique ability to translate stakeholder needs into transportation solutions. She has used this skill to write successful grant applications for her clients and receive funding for a variety of different projects, including HOV lanes, transit improvements, and transportation technology projects. She has won hundreds of millions of dollars through SB1, RAISE, INFRA, TIGER, CMIA, Prop 1B, and LA Metro Call for projects funding programs, among others. She understands that the key to a successful grant application is a story backed by data-driven analysis. She is an expert in transportation technology where she has planned and implemented projects for Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), SACOG, and Caltrans Districts 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, and 12. She also is an expert in the Systems Engineering process and systems integration. Alyssa has recently won $134 million in SB1 funds in the latest cycle.
Relevant Experience
• City of West Sacramento, Grant Writing Services, West Sacramento, CA – Grant Specialist • MTC, Data Integration of Work Zones Grant, San Francisco Bay Area, CA – QC/QA Reviewer • City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG), Smart Corridor Northern Cities TLSP, TFCA, and LPP Application Support, San Mateo County, CA – QC/QA Reviewer • City of Seaside, ATP Grant Assistance for Broadway Avenue Complete Street Corridor, Seaside, CA – Task Lead • SBCAG, SB1 Grant Services and Grant Writing Services, Santa Barbara County, CA – Project Manager • City of Malibu, Grant Writing Assistance, Malibu, CA – Project Lead • DOE, EERE, VTO Fiscal Year 2021 Research Funding Opportunity, Santa Clarita, CA – Project Manager • City of Santa Clarita, LA Metro Call for Projects Grant Application Assistance, Santa Clarita, CA – Project Manager • Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), Application and Grant Writing for Large Infrastructure Projects, Los Angeles, CA – Project Manager
• SANDAG, ATCMTD Grant Application, San Diego, CA – Task Lead • SANDAG, SMART Grant Assistance, San Diego, CA – Project Lead • City of Santa Clarita Department of Energy, Grant Writing Services, Santa Clarita, CA – Project Manager • San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG), Grant Writing Support, Alhambra, CA – Project Manager Professional Credentials
• Master of Science, Civil
Engineering—
Transportation, Georgia
Institute of Technology
• Master of City and Regional
Planning, Georgia Institute
of Technology
• Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, University of
California, Berkeley
• Professional Engineer in
California #63123
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-7
Daniel Carley, P.E.
Roadway & Active Transportation Design
Daniel is a professional engineer with more than 20 years of experience, specializing in both municipal and State roadway design projects. He has been involved with and managed many different types of projects, from planning to preliminary engineering to final PS&E for roadway modifications, BRT systems, roundabouts, and freeway interchanges. With these different types of projects, Daniel has been responsible for developing design alternatives, estimates of probable cost, specifications, and final construction plans.
Daniel is also up-to-date with the latest applicable design standards and guidelines, including ADA guidelines, Caltrans’ HDM and Standard Plans, AASHTO design guidelines, and the California MUTCD.
Relevant Experience
• City of West Sacramento, HSIP Cycle 9 Federal Projects: Traffic Safety Improvements, West Sacramento, CA – Project Manager • City of Sacramento, HSIP Cycle 9 Federal Projects: Lampasas Avenue at Rio Linda Boulevard Intersection Safety Improvements, Sacramento, CA – Project Manager
• City of Sonora, Stockton-Washington Downtown Corridor—Transit and Pedestrian Improvements, Sonora, CA – Project Manager • City of Sonora, Vision Sonora Scoping Plan, Sonora, CA – Project Engineer • City of Elk Grove, HSIP Pedestrian Improvements Project, Elk Grove, CA – Project Engineer • City of Watsonville, Highway 1 and Harkins Slough Road Pedestrian Bridge and SRTS Improvements Project, Watsonville, CA – Project Manager
• City of Citrus Heights, Greenback Lane Complete Streets Improvements Project, Citrus Heights, CA – Project Manager • City of Santa Rosa, Bicycle and Pedestrian Gap Closures at Piner Road and Dutton Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA – Project Manager • City of Marina, Imjin Parkway Roundabout and Widening Project, Marina, CA – Project Manager • City of Roseville, Junction Boulevard at Vallejo Avenue Intersection Improvements, Roseville, CA – Project Engineer • City of Roseville, Washington Boulevard at All American City Boulevard Roundabout Project, Roseville, CA – Project Engineer • City of Tracy, Valpico Road Precise Line, Tracy, CA – Project Manager • City of Tracy, Lammers Road Precise Line, Tracy, CA – Project Manager • City of Tracy, Grant Line Road Reconstruction and Widening—Parker Avenue and MacArthur Drive, Tracy, CA – Analyst • City of Tracy, Valpico Road, Tracy Boulevard, and MacArthur Drive Intersection Improvements, Tracy, CA – Project Engineer Professional Credentials
• Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, California
Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
• Professional Engineer in
California #76304
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-8
John Pulliam, P.E.
Roadway & Active Transportation Design
John is a project manager with more than 23 years of professional experience specializing in civil engineering and design. John is passionate about complete streets, having worked on a number of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit related projects. John has managed highly complex projects of all types including concept, preliminary, and final designs. He has designed street modifications, including complete/green streets, roundabouts, and transit facility design, including bus bulb-outs; pads and BRT stations; utility relocation/coordination and design; ADA compliance improvements; detention basins and outfall structures; construction oversight; and general civil engineering.
Relevant Experience
• City of San José, DOT Complete Streets Design On-Call, San José, CA – Project Manager • City of San José, Better Bikeways Project, San José, CA – Project Engineer • City of San José, 2019 Pavement Rehabilitation Project, San José, CA – Project Manager • VTA, Bascom Corridor Complete Streets Project, San José/Campbell/Santa Clara County, CA – Kimley-Horn Project Manager • City of Hollister, On-Call Services, Complete Streets, Bicycle and Pavement Rehabilitation, Hollister, CA – Project Manager • Santa Clara County, Highway and Street Design On-Call (2018), Santa Clara County, CA – Project Engineer • City of Burlingame, Carolan Avenue Complete Street, Burlingame, CA – Project Manager • County of San Benito, San Benito Street/River Parkway Improvements Project, San Benito, CA – Project Manager • City of Dublin, Dougherty Road Improvements, Dublin, CA – Project Manager • City of Dublin, Safe Routes to School Crosswalk and Curb Ramp Improvement Projects and Traffic Signal Modifications, Dublin, CA – Principal-in-Charge
• City of Union City, Union City Boulevard Improvement Project, Union City, CA – Project Manager • City of Monterey, North Fremont Street Bike and Pedestrian Access and Safety Improvements, Monterey, CA – Project Manager • City of Mountain View, Shoreline Boulevard Interim Bus Lane and Utility Improvements, Mountain View, CA – Project Manager • City of Burlingame, California Drive Roundabout Project, Burlingame, CA – Project Manager • LA Metro, North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT, Los Angeles/Glendale/Pasadena, CA – Civil Design Lead Professional Credentials
• Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering (Environmental
Emphasis), University of
Missouri, Columbia
• Bachelor of Science,
Biology, Drury University
• Professional Engineer in
California #68897
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-9
Sean Houck, P.E.
Intersection Control Evaluations & Benefit-Cost Analysis; Before & After Studies
Sean is a principal engineer with 28 years of success in the development and delivery of transportation projects for state and local agencies throughout California. His experience includes the preparation of feasibility studies, intersection control evaluations, project initiation documents, project assessment and environmental documents. Sean's project experience includes the planning and design of urban highway interchanges, urban arterials and collectors, road diet and complete street projects, conventional highways, as well as rail and transit facilities. For the past 20 years, Sean has specialized in the design of roundabouts and the evaluation of innovative intersection solutions. His extensive roundabout experience includes the planning, design, and construction support of mini, single lane, and multi-lane roundabouts across the country.
Relevant Experience
• City of West Sacramento, Grant Writing Services On-Call, West Sacramento County, CA – Task Lead • City of West Sacramento, HSIP Cycle 9 Federal Projects: Traffic Safety Improvements, West Sacramento, CA – QC/QA Manager • City of King City, HSIP Grant Application for Broadway/U.S. 101 Roundabout, King City, CA – Project Manager • City of Burlingame, California Drive Roundabout Project, Burlingame, CA – Project Engineer • City of Salinas, RSTP Grant Application for Bardin Road Safe Routes to School Enhancements, Salinas, CA – Project Manager • City of Salinas, HSIP Grant Application for Williams Road, Salinas, CA – Project Manager • City of Seaside, ATP Grant Assistance for Broadway Avenue Complete Street Corridor, Seaside, CA – Project Manager • City of Seaside, Citywide Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) and RSTP Grant Applications, Seaside, CA – Project Manager • SBCAG, SB1 Grant Services and Grant Writing Services, Santa Barbara County, CA – Task Lead • City of Lincoln, Engineering Design Services on the East Joiner Parkway Widening Project, Lincoln, CA – Project Manager • City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for the Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP), Goleta, CA – Project Engineer • City of Roseville, Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard Roundabout Project, Roseville, CA – Project Engineer Professional Credentials
• Master of Science, Civil
Engineering, California
State University, Long
Beach
• Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, California
State University, Long
Beach
• Professional Engineer in
California #59500
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-10
Chris Gregerson, P.E., T.E., PTOE, PTP, AICP
Data Collection & Traffic Operations
Chris is a professional civil and traffic engineer with more than 12 years of experience in developing traffic impact analyses for both new developments and the expansion of existing developments. Chris has direct experience in developing and updating impact fee programs for both the technical and public involvement components of the project. Chris also has experience running travel demand models in both the standard and activity-based approaches as well as calibrating mode choice models for metropolitan regions. He has assisted with the development of SB 743 thresholds and policies for multiple northern and central California jurisdictions. In addition, he has led and assisted with completing multiple complex VMT/SB 743 analyses for clients throughout California covering a broad range of land use types. Chris is also skilled in GIS and has experience managing and interpreting data for special analysis and graphics creation.
Relevant Experience
• City of Modesto, State Route 132 (D Street-14th Street) Intersection Improvement Project, Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE), Modesto, CA – Project Analyst
• City of Sacramento, Transportation Engineering On-Call, Sacramento, CA – Project Engineer
• City of Tracy, Citywide Roadway and Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Update, Tracy, CA – Project Engineer • StanCOG, 2022 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Community Strategy, Stanislaus County, CA – Project Planner • City of Folsom, On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Folsom, CA – Project Engineer • County of El Dorado, Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee Update, El Dorado County, CA – Project Planner • City of Concord, Transportation Impact Fee Update, Concord, CA – Project Planner/Engineer • TVTC, Transportation Impact Fee Program Update, Tri-Valley, CA – Project Planner • TAMC, 2016 FORA Transportation Impact Fee Study Update, Monterey Bay, CA – Modeler • City of Tracy, Transportation Impact Fee, SB 743 Implementation Program, and VMT Fee-Based Mitigation Bank, Tracy, CA – Project Planner
• Fresno COG, VMT Fee-Based Mitigation Banking Program, Fresno County, CA – Senior Planner • City of Salinas, SB 743 Implementation and VMT Fee-Based Banking Plan, Salinas, CA – Project Planner • County of Santa Cruz/Cities of Capitola, Santa Cruz, Watsonville, and Scott’s Valley, SB 743 Implementation Plan, Santa Cruz County, CA – Project Planner
• City of Monterey, SB 743 Implementation Plan VMT Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for General Plan Implementation, Monterey, CA – Project Planner
• Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission, Travel Demand Model Update, Santa Cruz County, CA – Project Planner
• City of Tracy, Big Data-Based SB 743 Implementation Program, Tracy, CA – Project Planner • County of El Dorado, Travel Demand Model Update, El Dorado County, CA – Project Planner Professional Credentials
• Master of Science,
Transportation Engineering,
University of Illinois at
Urbana- Champaign
• Bachelor of Science,
Industrial Engineering,
Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State
University
• Professional Engineer in
California #86812
• Professional Traffic
Engineer in California
#2860
• Professional Traffic
Operations Engineer #4588
• Professional Transportation
Planner #657
• American Institute of
Certified Planners #35800
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-11
Andy Sanford, P.E.
Structural Engineering and Bridge Design
Andy has an extensive background in structural design, leading the design of over 75 bridge projects, representing well over 100 individual bridges, including PS&E and Advance Planning Studies for both PSR and PA&ED documents. With more than 35 years of experience, including six years with Caltrans as a project engineer, his background ranges from bridge widenings, seismic retrofits, and bridge repairs to multi-structure interchanges and long aerial viaducts. In addition, he has led the design of numerous grade separations, underpasses, and overcrossings, and is very familiar with coordinating with federal, state, and local agencies, including Caltrans District 8.
Relevant Experience
• City of Santa Ana, Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program, Santa Ana, CA – Project Manager • Alameda CTC, I-880 Interchange Improvements (Winton Ave/A St) PID and PA&ED, Hayward and Union City, CA – Structural Engineer
• MTC, I-580 HOV Lane Extension PID, PA&ED and PS&E, Oakland, CA – Structural Engineer • County of San Benito, Carr Avenue Bridge Replacement, PS&E, San Benito County, CA – Project Manager • County of San Benito, Cienega Road Bridge Replacement, PS&E, San Benito County, CA – Project Manager • County of San Benito, Panoche Road Bridge Scour Countermeasure, San Benito County, CA – Project Manager • County of Riverside, I-10/Sunset Avenue Interchange PEER and PS&E, Banning, CA (District 8) – Structures Lead • County of Riverside, I-215/Van Buren Boulevard PA&ED and PS&E, Riverside County, CA (District 8) – Structures Lead • SBCTA, I-10/Mt. Vernon Avenue Interchange PA&ED and PS&E, Colton, CA (District 8) – Structures Lead • City of Barstow, North First Avenue Bridge Replacement PSR, PA&ED, and PS&E, Barstow, CA (District 8) – KH Project Manager • City of Ontario, Ontario Ranch Road - Three Span Bridge, Ontario, CA – Bridge Engineer • City of Barstow, First Ave Bridge over Mojave River Bridge Replacement PA&ED, Barstow, CA – Project Engineer • City of Barstow, Yucca Avenue Overhead Retrofit, Barstow, CA – Project Manager • City of San Diego, I-5/Genesee Avenue Interchange PA&ED, PS&E and Construction Phase Services (CPS), San Diego, CA – Structural Engineer
• Caltrans D11, Voigt Drive/I-5 North Coast Corridor (NCC) Improvements (PS&E), San Diego, CA – Structures Task Manager • City of Lancaster, Avenue J/SR 14 (SR 138) Interchange PSR-PDS, PA&ED and PS&E, Lancaster, CA – Structural Engineer Professional Credentials
• Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, California
State University, Chico
• Professional Engineer,
California #49671
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-12
Brandi Childress
Community Engagement; Equity & Social Data Analysis
Brandi brings 24 years of experience in stakeholder engagement, community involvement, and strategic communications within the transportation industry. She has led successful teams and a long list of varied projects by prioritizing strong partnerships, connection, collaboration, and early and active public engagement throughout all phases of a project’s delivery process. Brandi’s most recent projects include a transit reliability study for Santa Cruz METRO, corridor crossing strategy plan for Caltrain, and a rail crossing safety improvements plan update for Solano Transportation Authority where she is leading the community outreach and stakeholder engagement work. Prior to joining Kimley-Horn, Brandi grew her public involvement career with the Santa Clara VTA since 2001, serving as Chief Media Spokesperson and Public Affairs Manager before ultimately promoting to Chief of Staff to the General Manager. Her deep roots in public service have allowed her to creatively implement transportation improvements with and for communities who need them most.
Relevant Experience
• Caltrain, Diridon Intermodal Station Business Case, San Jose, CA – Policy and Program Support • Caltrain, Corridor Crossings Strategy, San Jose, CA – Policy and Planning Support • Santa Cruz METRO, Caltrans Intercity Transit Speed and Reliability Study, Santa Cruz, CA – Community Involvement and Stakeholder Engagement
• San Mateo County Transportation Authority, US101/SR92 Interchange Project, San Mateo, CA – Public Outreach • City of Sunnyvale, Tasman Drive Pedestrian/Bike Facility Installation, Sunnyvale, CA – Community Involvement and Stakeholder Engagement
• City of Milpitas, Traffic and Safety Study, Milpitas, CA – Public Engagement • City of San Pablo, San Pablo Avenue Bridge Replacement Project, San Pablo, CA – Community Involvement and Stakeholder Engagement
• VTA, BART Silicon Valley Program (Phase I and II) – Public Affairs (strategy, media, engagement)* • VTA, Complete Streets Program, Santa Clara County, CA – Community Involvement and Stakeholder Engagement* *Prior to Kimley-Horn
Professional Credentials
• Master of Transportation
Management, California
State University, San Jose
• Bachelor of Business
Administration, California
State University
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● A-13
Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSP2B
Equity & Social Data Analysis
Darryl has more than 16 years of experience assisting on and leading transportation planning and engineering projects and has supported clients in the successful pursuit of state and federal grants through a variant of programs including the Highway Safety Improvement Program, Safe Streets for All, RAISE, and several SB 1 funding programs. He uses data driven approaches to assess transportation system performance for operations, safety, equity, and other factors as needed. As a GIS Professional, Darryl often uses GIS to efficiently assess existing conditions and to analyze project alternatives. He has supported the development and implementation of GIS analysis methods for transit and traffic performance assessment, traffic safety analysis, ADA transition plans and other transportation planning functions.
Relevant Experience
• Various Clients, HSIP Grant Applications, Various Locations, CA – Project Planner • Various Clients, Solutions for Congested Corridors Grants, Sacramento County, San Luis Obispo County, CA – Project Planner
• Various Clients, Sustainable Communities Planning Grants, Sacramento County, Riverside County, CA – Project Planner • Caltrans, California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Implementation, Statewide, CA – Project Planner • Caltrans, Safety Performance Measure Target Setting Analysis, Statewide, CA – Project Planner • Transportation Authority of Marin (TAM), U.S. 101 Capacity Expansion BUILD Grant, Marin County, CA – Project Planner • SBCAG, SB1 Grant Services and Grant Writing Services, Santa Barbara County, CA – Project Planner • City of Agoura Hills, FEMA Roadway Enhancement and Flood Preparation Grant Application, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Planner Professional Credentials
• Master of Urban Spatial
Analytics, University of
Pennsylvania
• Bachelor of Arts,
Geography, Carleton
University, Ottawa, ON,
Canada
• American Institute of
Certified Planners
#026552
• Certificate in Geographic
Information Systems,
Algonquin College, Ottawa,
ON, Canada
• Professional Geo Info
Systems #59317
• Road Safety Professional
Level 1 #279 and Level 2B
#17
ATTACHMENT 2
ID Task
Mode
Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 City of Manteca - Grant Schedules 161 days Fri 3/22/24 Fri 11/1/24 2 NTP 0 days Fri 3/22/24 Fri 3/22/24
3 SS4A Implementation Grant Application 161 days Fri 3/22/24 Fri 11/1/24 4 SS4A NOFO Released 0 days Fri 3/22/24 Fri 3/22/24
5 Meetings 36 days Fri 3/22/24 Mon 5/13/24
6 Project Kickoff 0 days Fri 3/22/24 Fri 3/22/24 2
7 Draft 1 Review 0 days Mon 4/22/24 Mon 4/22/24 12FS+1 day 8 Draft 2 Review 0 days Mon 5/13/24 Mon 5/13/24 17FS+1 day 9 Draft 1 20 days Fri 3/22/24 Thu 4/18/24
10 Standard Forms & Narrative 15 days Fri 3/22/24 Thu 4/11/24 6 11 Collision Diagrams & Countermeasure Exhibits 15 days Fri 3/22/24 Thu 4/11/24 6 12 City Review 5 days Fri 4/12/24 Thu 4/18/24 11
13 Draft 2 35 days Fri 3/22/24 Thu 5/9/24
14 Standard Forms & Narrative 10 days Fri 4/19/24 Thu 5/2/24 12 15 Layout Plans & OPCC 25 days Fri 3/22/24 Thu 4/25/24 2 16 Collision Diagrams & Countermeasure Exhibits 10 days Fri 4/19/24 Thu 5/2/24 12 17 City Review 5 days Fri 5/3/24 Thu 5/9/24 16
18 Final Draft 3 days Fri 5/10/24 Tue 5/14/24
19 Standard Forms & Narrative 3 days Fri 5/10/24 Tue 5/14/24 17 20 Layout Plans & OPCC 3 days Fri 5/10/24 Tue 5/14/24 17 21 Collision Diagrams & Countermeasure Exhibits 3 days Fri 5/10/24 Tue 5/14/24 17 22 Implementation Grant Deadline 0 days Thu 5/16/24 Thu 5/16/24 23 24 HSIP Grant Application 94 days Mon 5/6/24 Fri 9/13/24 25 Anticipated Call for Projects May 2024
26 Meetings 80 days Mon 5/6/24 Mon 8/26/24
27 Project Identification & Ranking 10 days Mon 5/6/24 Fri 5/17/24 28 Project Kickoff 0 days Fri 5/17/24 Fri 5/17/24 27
29 Draft 1 Review 0 days Mon 7/15/24 Mon 7/15/24 35
30 Draft 2 Review 0 days Mon 8/26/24 Mon 8/26/24 40
31 Draft 1 40 days Mon 5/20/24 Fri 7/12/24
32 Narrative 30 days Mon 5/20/24 Fri 6/28/24 28
33 Collision Diagrams & Layout Exhibits 30 days Mon 5/20/24 Fri 6/28/24 28 34 Benefit Cost Analysis - Matrix of Countermeasures 30 days Mon 5/20/24 Fri 6/28/24 28 35 City Review 10 days Mon 7/1/24 Fri 7/12/24 34
36 Draft 2 30 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 8/23/24
37 Narrative 20 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 8/9/24 35
38 Collision Diagrams & Layout Exhibits 20 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 8/9/24 35 39 Benefit Cost Analysis - Preferred Alternative 20 days Mon 7/15/24 Fri 8/9/24 35 40 City Review 10 days Mon 8/12/24 Fri 8/23/24 39
41 Final Draft 10 days Mon 8/26/24 Fri 9/6/24
42 Narrative 10 days Mon 8/26/24 Fri 9/6/24 40
43 Collision Diagrams & Layout Exhibits 10 days Mon 8/26/24 Fri 9/6/24 40 44 Benefit Cost Analysis 10 days Mon 8/26/24 Fri 9/6/24 40 45 Approximate HSIP Grant Deadline 0 days Fri 9/13/24 Fri 9/13/24 46 47 Bridge Investment Program (BIP) Grant Application - Bridge Project FY 2025
105 days Mon 6/10/24 Fri 11/1/24
48 Anticipated Call for Projects Open
49 Meetings 90 days Mon 6/10/24 Mon 10/14/24
50 Bridge Identification & Prioritization (BPMP Plan) 30 days Mon 6/10/24 Fri 7/19/24 51 Project Kickoff 0 days Fri 7/19/24 Fri 7/19/24 50
52 Draft 1 Review 0 days Mon 9/9/24 Mon 9/9/24 58
53 Draft 2 Review 0 days Mon 10/14/24Mon 10/14/24 63
54 Draft 1 35 days Mon 7/22/24 Fri 9/6/24
55 Narrative 25 days Mon 7/22/24 Fri 8/23/24 51
56 Bridge Assesment 25 days Mon 7/22/24 Fri 8/23/24 51
57 Cost Estimate & Total Participation Costs 25 days Mon 7/22/24 Fri 8/23/24 51 58 City Review 10 days Mon 8/26/24 Fri 9/6/24 57
59 Draft 2 25 days Mon 9/9/24 Fri 10/11/24
60 Narrative 15 days Mon 9/9/24 Fri 9/27/24 58
61 Bridge Assesment 15 days Mon 9/9/24 Fri 9/27/24 58
62 Cost Estimate & Total Participation Costs 15 days Mon 9/9/24 Fri 9/27/24 58 63 City Review 10 days Mon 9/30/24 Fri 10/11/24 62
64 Final Draft 10 days Mon 10/14/24Fri 10/25/24
65 Narrative 10 days Mon 10/14/24Fri 10/25/24 63
66 Bridge Assesment 10 days Mon 10/14/24Fri 10/25/24 63 67 Cost Estimate & Total Participation Costs 10 days Mon 10/14/24Fri 10/25/24 63 68 Bridge Project FY 2025 Grant Deadline 0 days Fri 11/1/24 Fri 11/1/24 69 3/22
3/22
3/22
4/22
5/13
5/16
5/17
7/15
8/26
9/13
7/19
9/9
10/14
11/1
16 21 26 31 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 4 9 14 19 24 29 4 9 14 19 24 29 3 8 13 18 23 28 2 7 12 17 22 27 2 7 12 17 22 27 1 6 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Path Successor Milestone Task
Path Successor Summary Task
Path Successor Normal Task
Progress
Manual Progress
Project: Manteca_Grant-Schedu
Date: Mon 3/11/24
ATTACHMENT 2
Broadway Complete Streets Project, Phase 1 Page 1
Progress Report
To:
From: Kimley-Horn & Associates
Re: ATP Project, Phase 1
Progress Report – October 2023
Date: October 31, 2023
The following services were provided by Kimley-Horn during the period of October 1 through October 31, 2023:
Task 1: Project Management, Coordination, & Documentation Task 1.1: Project Administration • Meeting notes & action items Task 1.2: Coordination and Meetings • Biweekly meetings & Coordination with CTC Task 1.3: MST Coordination • N/W
Task 1.4: Coordination for RFA for
PS&E
• N/W
Task 1.5: QA/QC • N/W
Task 2: Public Outreach and Stakeholder Coordination
Task 2.1: Stakeholder Coordination • N/W
Task 2.1.1: Stakeholder Meetings • N/W
Task 2.1.2: Presentation to City’s
Board of Architectural Review and
Planning Commission • N/W
Task 2.2: Community Meetings and
Coordination • N/W
Task 2.2.1: Community Workshop #1
– Existing Conditions and Corridor
Concept • N/W
Task 2.2.2: Community Workshop #2
– Proposed Project
• N/W
Task 2.2.2: Community Workshop #3
– Outreach Results • N/W
ATTACHMENT 2
Broadway Complete Streets Project, Phase 1 Page 2
Task 2.3: Project Information and
Outreach Materials • N/W
Task 3: Utility Coordination and Facility Mapping
Task 3.1: Utility Coordination • Coordination with City / Subs Task 3.2: Utility Facility Mapping • N/W
Task 2.1.2: Presentation to City’s
Board of Architectural Review and
Planning Commission • N/W
Task 4: Data Collection
Task 4.1: Topographic Survey and
Right of Way Mapping
• Whitson
o Final surface model, ROW, and centerline
information has been received
Task 4.2: Geotechnical Services • AllEarth
o Final geotechnical report received
• KHA reviewed report
Task 4.3: Field Visits • N/W
Task 5: CEQA Compliance (IS/MND)
Task 5.1: Air Quality Study • Final complete
Task 5.2: Energy Analysis • Final complete
Task 5.3: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Analysis • Final complete
Task 5.4: Noise and Vibration Analysis • Final complete Task 5.5: Transportation
Safety/Hazards/Traffic Management • Final complete
Task 5.6: Tribal/Cultural Resource
Consultation Assistance • Final complete
Task 5.7: Public Review Draft IS/MND • Final IS completed and public review has been completed.
• Results presented at City Council Meeting (03/02)
Task 5.8: Required Notices/Electronic
Document Submittal Assistance • NOI completed for public review ATTACHMENT 2
Broadway Complete Streets Project, Phase 1 Page 3
Task 5.9: Environmental Coordination
and Meeting Attendance • IS/MND presented at City Council Meeting (03/02) Task 6: Preliminary Engineering
Task 6.1: Concept Refinement • Refinements made based on Design Charette meetings, input from MST, Fire, and MLK School
• Flores intersection layout update
Task 6.2: 30% Design/GAD • N/W
Task 6.3: Drainage and Stormwater
Analysis • N/W
Task 6.4: Urban Design Palate
Concepts • N/W
N/W: No work was completed under this task
Budget Considerations
Task Description
Schedule Considerations
Task Description
ATTACHMENT 2
Broadway Complete Streets Project, Phase 1 Page 4
Deliverable Log
Task Deliverable
Status
Not
Started
In-Progress Completed
2 Community Engagement Strategy X
2 Project website with interactive online project forum X 2 Community meeting notice flyers (#1) X
2 Community Meeting Presentation (#1) X
2 Community meeting notice flyers (#2) X
2 Community Meeting Presentation (#2) X
2 Public outreach materials for meetings X
2 Summary meeting notes for meetings X
3 Utility Record Maps and Base Map AutoCAD file (if requested) X 4 Topographic Survey and Right of Way AutoCAD file (if requested) X 4 Geotechnical Report X
5 Administrative Draft IS/MND X
5 Public Review Draft IS/MND X
5 Written Responses to Public Comments X
5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program X
5 Draft CEQA Notices X
6 30% Design/GAD Plans X
6 30% OPCC X
6 Roundabout Performance Memorandum X
6 Draft Drainage and Stormwater Treatment Memorandum X
6 Draft Concept Landscape and Hardscape Board X
6 Final Concept Landscape and Hardscape Board X
ATTACHMENT 2
Broadway Complete Streets Project, Phase 2 Page 1
Progress Report
To: City
From: Kimley-Horn & Associates
Re: ATP Project, Phase 2
Progress Report – January 2024
Date: February 26, 2024
The following services were provided by Kimley-Horn during the period of January 1 through January 31, 2024:
Task 1: Project Management, Coordination, & Documentation Task 1.1: Project Administration • Meeting notes & action items (attached) Task 1.2: Coordination and Meetings • Biweekly meetings Task 1.3: MST Coordination • N/W
Task 1.4: ATP Reporting Assistance • Meeting with CTC (Diana) and TAMC (Ariana) Task 1.5: Coordination for RFA for
Construction
• N/W
Task 1.6: QA/QC • N/W
Task 2: Utility Coordination
Task 2.1 Potholing • N/W
Task 2.2 Utility Coordination • N/W
Task 3: Utility Coordination and Facility Mapping
Task 3.1: 60% PS&E • Design memos for specific features (crosswalk, bike ramps, etc)
• Intersection refinements and MLK frontage
• Vertical design
Task 3.2: 90% PS&E • N/W
Task 3.3: Final/Bid PS&E • N/W
Task 4: Data Collection
Task 4.1: Bidding Support Services • N/W
Task 5: CEQA Compliance (IS/MND)
Task 5.1: DSDC • N/W
ATTACHMENT 2
Broadway Complete Streets Project, Phase 2 Page 2
Task 5.2: Prepare Record Drawings • N/W
Budget Considerations
Task Description
Schedule Considerations
Task Description
ATTACHMENT 2
Broadway Complete Streets Project, Phase 2 Page 3
Deliverable Log
Task Deliverable
Status
Not
Started
In-Progress Completed
1 Monthly invoices (PDF) X
1 Meeting notes (PDF) X
1 Baseline Agreement and RFA documentation (PDF) X
1 Monthly schedule updates (PDF) X
1 Assist with Quarterly Progress Reports, Completion Report, and Final Delivery Report X
1 QC Markups (as requested, PDF) X
3 60% Plans (PDF, two (2) hardcopies, 24”x36”, bond) X
3 60% OPCC (Excel, PDF) X
3 90% Plans (PDF, two (2) hardcopies, 24”x36”, bond) X 3 90% OPCC (Excel, PDF) X
3 90% Technical Specifications (DOC, PDF) X
3 Responses to City’s review comments on 60% submittal
with return markups X
3 Final/Signed Plans (PDF, one (1) hardcopy,24”x36”, bond) X 3 Final/Signed Specifications (PDF) X
3 Final OPCC (PDF) X
3 Responses to City’s review comments on 90% submittal
with return markups X
3 Raw before and after count data (PDF) X
5 Record Drawings X
ATTACHMENT 2
Meeting Notes
Re: Biweekly Check-In Meeting
Broadway Corridor Improvements ‑ PS&E
Date: February 20, 2024, 9 – 10 AM
Virtual
Leslie Llantero - City of Seaside, Assistant Engineer ([email protected]) Molly Tremblay – Kimley Horn, Funding Lead ([email protected])
1. Extensions Requests
a. Review Draft LAPG 25-A
i. Updated documents sent to City for signature (02/20/24) ii. Need to return to Diana by 03/16
b. Non-infra & CON should be submitted at the same time, but do not need the same allocation & expenditure dates
c. Must submit no later than 04/29/23
i. Should plan to submit 1 week prior todeadline
2024 California Transportation Commission (CTC) Meeting Schedule Date Local Agency Submits
Jan 25-26 Mon, Nov 27
March 21-22 Mon, Jan 22
May 16-17 Mon, Mar 18 Target
June 27-28 Mon, Apr 29 Latest Date
d. Schedule for non-infra
i. Start non-infra 09/24
ii. Request allocation 08/24
e. Schedule for CON
i. 11/17/25 – 11/30/27
2. School Meeting Notes
a. Review notes prior to sending to school
b. Additional analysis
3. Memo responses
a. Need City response on Crosswalk Cross-Slope & Bike Path Alternatives b. KHA to send revised Terrace / Sight line memo
Broadway Corridor Improvements Page 1 of 1
Biweekly Meeting Agenda February 20, 2024
ATTACHMENT 2
CONTACT
Molly Tremblay
[email protected]
619.272.7191
www.kimley-horn.com
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
The entirety of this proposal, including text and
images, is the property of Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc., protected under U.S. copyright law.
Copyright © 2024 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
13 EXHIBIT C
Fee Schedule
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Manteca ● GMOC86013.2024 ● 11
C.3. Hourly Rates
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Hourly Labor Rate Schedule
Classification Rate
Analyst I $130 - $165
Analyst II $170 - $200
Professional $200 - $245
Senior Professional I $245 - $335
Senior Professional II $340 - $395
Senior Technical Support $115 - $290
Technical Support $105 - $165
Support Staff $85 - $145
Effective through June 30, 2025.
Subject to annual adjustment thereafter.
External Reimbursable Expenses will be charged at 10% mark-up, or per the Contract.
Sub-Consultants will be billed at 10% mark-up, or per the Contract.
ATTACHMENT 2
Agreement for Services
14 EXHIBIT D
CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
ATTACHMENT 2
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :
INSURER E :
INSURER D :
INSURER C :
INSURER B :
INSURER A : NAIC #
NAME: CONTACT
(A/C, No): FAX
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext): PHONE
INSURED
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A
SUBR WVDADDL
INSD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $
$
$
$ PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
AUTOS ONLY
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS NON-OWNED OWNED SCHEDULED
ANY AUTO
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEEE.L. EACH ACCIDENT EROTH- STATUTE PER
(MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EFFLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER INSR
EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $
$
OCCUR
CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ MED EXP (Any one person) $
EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
CANCELLATION
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED
AUTOS ONLY
3/18/2024
Edgewood Partners Ins. Center/Greyling
3780 Mansell Rd. Suite 370
Alpharetta GA 30022
Jerry Noyola 7702207699 [email protected] National Union Fire Ins Co of Pittsburg 19445 KIMLASS Allied World Assurance Co (U.S.) Inc. 19489 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27601
New Hampshire Insurance Company 23841 Lloyd's of London 85202 225649506 A X 2,000,000 X 1,000,000 X Contractual Liab 25,000 2,000,000 4,000,000 X X GL5268169 4/1/2024 4/1/2025
4,000,000
A
A
2,000,000 X
X X
CA4489663 (AOS)
CA2970071 (MA)
4/1/2024
4/1/2024
4/1/2025
4/1/2025
B X X 5,000,000 X
03127930 4/1/2024 4/1/2025
5,000,000 X
10,000
C
C
X
N
WC015893685 (AOS)
WC015893686 (CA)
4/1/2024
4/1/2024
4/1/2025
4/1/2025
2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
D Professional Liability B0146LDUSA2404949 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 Per Claim Aggregate
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
City of Manteca
1001 W. Center Street
Manteca CA 95337-0000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) The City of Manteca, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are named as additional Insureds with respect to General & Automobile Liability where required by written contract. The above referenced liability policies with the exception of workers compensation and professional liability are primary & non-contributory where required by written contract. Waiver of Subrogation in favor of Additional Insured(s) where required by written contract & allowed by law. Should any of the above described policies be cancelled by the issuing insurer before the expiration date thereof, 30 days' written notice (except 10 days for nonpayment of premium) will be provided to the Certificate Holder.
ATTACHMENT 2
!"#$$% $ !"&!$$
'!#(
)$$%*+,-*./$ $0!"1(
2&
3"
4%%& "$"!'!$5&"%'" !"(4#!!$
& 67&!( !!"8"&
$#9&#:&"&'$&(
!! !"!"'$"7&!(
;<=>?@=
AAABCB
D?EF=GHIJE=>KL
M>NAOPQOR
?F<DGIS=>=TG=H=EFUFIV=
W$WWW !'!WWXW$W %W&WWW$WWX(7(.(W*YZ*[-*W&WX(7(.W
*YZ*[-\WW &'!W&WWW$WWX(7(.(W*YZ*]-*W&W*YZ*]-[)W8 W#W W'"W &WWW !'!W!#)W&WW$W&WW# Z& W&W (
."W WW6W$W#WW !"WWW'"W#W)W8&W WW!)W"W8&W
W#%W$W&'(W^#%)W$W & W$W#9W $W'"WW !"WW/&)WW#%W$W
&'WWW !"WW"W&W& W$W!$WWW'"WW#%W$WWW%W
$WW_&'`W&!WW&W&!(
W$WWW !'!WWa!$)WX&9")W1#W^ )W1#Wb")W8)WWc(
defWghijkeWkiWkildemndomkeWokWpqkrWfksWthukrhWWWWWW
ktvmldohwWokWpdmxhWfksiWimlqojWkyWihukxhifWWWWWWWWW
dldmejozWsewhiWdefWpimooheWukeoiduoWkiWdlihhrheoWWW
fksWheohiWmeokWgimkiWokWoqhWkuusiiheuhWkyWvkjj{
|}~|~|puWWW|
mrvhfqkieWdewWdjjkumdohjzWmeu{
ehpWqdrgjqmihWmejsideuhWukrgdef
04/01/2024
ATTACHMENT 2
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS - COMPLETED OPERATIONS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
SCHEDULE
Name Of Additional Insured Person(s)
Or Organization(s) Location And Description Of Completed Operations
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG 20 37 12 19
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
POLICY NUMBER: 526-81-69
ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WHOM YOU
BECOME OBLIGATED TO INCLUDE AS AN
ADDITIONAL INSURED AS A RESULT OF ANY
CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT YOU HAVE ENTERED
INTO.
PER THE CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT.
Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.
A. Section II – Who Is An Insured is amended to
include as an additional insured the person(s) or
organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only
with respect to liability for "bodily injury" or
"property damage" caused, in whole or in part,
by "your work" at the location designated and
described in the Schedule of this endorsement
performed for that additional insured and
included in the "products-completed operations
hazard".
However:
1. The insurance afforded to such additional
insured only applies to the extent permitted
by law; and
2. If coverage provided to the additional
insured is required by a contract or
agreement, the insurance afforded to such
additional insured will not be broader than
that which you are required by the contract
or agreement to provide for such additional
insured.
B. With respect to the insurance afforded to
these additional insureds, the following is
added to Section III – Limits Of Insurance:
If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the most
we will pay on behalf of the additional insured
is the amount of insurance:
1. Required by the contract or agreement; or
2. Available under the applicable limits of
insurance;
whichever is less.
This endorsement shall not increase the
applicable limits of insurance.
CG 20 37 12 19 Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page of 1 1 ATTACHMENT 2
04/01/2024
ATTACHMENT 2
04/01/2024
ATTACHMENT 2
POLICY NUMBER:
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PERSON OR
ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
SCHEDULE
Name Of Additional Insured Person(s)
Or Organization(s) Location(s) Of Covered Operations
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG 20 10 12 19
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. 526-81-69
ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WHOM YOU
BECOME OBLIGATED TO INCLUDE AS AN
ADDITIONAL INSURED AS A RESULT OF ANY
CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT YOU HAVE ENTERED
INTO.
PER THE CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT.
Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.
CG 20 10 12 19 Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page of1 2 ATTACHMENT 2
A. Section II – Who Is An Insured is amended to
include as an additional insured the person(s) or
organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only
with respect to liability for "bodily injury",
"property damage" or "personal and advertising
injury" caused, in whole or in part, by:
1. Your acts or omissions; or
2. The acts or omissions of those acting on
your behalf;
in the performance of your ongoing operations
for the additional insured(s) at the location(s)
designated above.
However:
1. The insurance afforded to such additional
insured only applies to the extent permitted
by law; and
2. If coverage provided to the additional
insured is required by a contract or
agreement, the insurance afforded to such
additional insured will not be broader than
that which you are required by the contract
or agreement to provide for such additional
insured.
B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following additional
exclusions apply:
This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury"
or "property damage" occurring after:
1. All work, including materials, parts or
equipment furnished in connection with such
work, on the project (other than service,
maintenance or repairs) to be performed by
or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at
the location of the covered operations has
been completed; or
2. That portion of "your work" out of which
the injury or damage arises has been put to
its intended use by any person or
organization other than another contractor or
subcontractor engaged in performing
operations for a principal as a part of the
same project.
C. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
additional insureds, the following is added to
Section III – Limits Of Insurance:
If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the most
we will pay on behalf of the additional insured
is the amount of insurance:
1. Required by the contract or agreement; or
2. Available under the applicable limits of
insurance;
whichever is less.
This endorsement shall not increase the
applicable limits of insurance.
Page of2 2 Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 CG 20 10 12 19 ATTACHMENT 2
POLICY NUMBER:
PRIMARY AND NONCONTRIBUTORY -
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG 20 01 12 19
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
CG 20 01 12 19 Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 1
OTHER INSURANCE CONDITION
The following is added to the Other Insurance
Condition and supersedes any provision to the
contrary:
Primary And Noncontributory Insurance
This insurance is primary to and will not seek
contribution from any other insurance available
to an additional insured under your policy
provided that:
(1) The additional insured is a Named Insured
under such other insurance; and
(2) You have agreed in writing in a contract or
agreement that this insurance would be
primary and would not seek contribution
from any other insurance available to the
additional insured.
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
LIQUOR LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
526-81-69
ATTACHMENT 2
POLICY NUMBER:
WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY
AGAINST OTHERS TO US (WAIVER OF SUBROGATION)
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG 24 04 12 19
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
SCHEDULE
Name Of Person(s) Or Organization(s):
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
ELECTRONIC DATA LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
LIQUOR LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
POLLUTION LIABILITY COVERAGE PART DESIGNATED SITES
POLLUTION LIABILITY LIMITED COVERAGE PART DESIGNATED SITES
PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
RAILROAD PROTECTIVE LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK POLICY DESIGNATED TANKS
526-81-69
PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE WRITTEN CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT YOU ENTER INTO.
Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.
The following is added to Paragraph 8. Transfer Of
Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us of
Section IV – Conditions:
We waive any right of recovery against the
person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule
above because of payments we make under this
Coverage Part. Such waiver by us applies only to
the extent that the insured has waived its right of
recovery against such person(s) or organization(s)
prior to loss. This endorsement applies only to the
person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule
above.
The following is added to Paragraph 8. Transfer Of
Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us of
Section IV – Conditions:
We waive any right of recovery against the
person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule
above because of payments we make under this
Coverage Part. Such waiver by us applies only to
the extent that the insured has waived its right of
recovery against such person(s) or organization(s)
prior to loss. This endorsement applies only to the
person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule
above.
CG 24 04 12 19 Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 2