ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
See attached Clerk Certificate
ATTACHMENT 3
CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE AUTHORITY
Mark Thomas
The undersigned, Matt Brogan, Secretary of Mark Thomas. (the "Company"), HEREBY CERTIFIES as follows:
He is the duly elected Secretary of the Company, a California corporation.
At a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company on June 20 2025, the following resolution was adopted:
RESOLVED: That certain individuals of this corporation, acting singly, be and hereby are authorized at any time and from time to time, to enter into contracts or other binding agreements (such as NDAs and teaming agreements) for the provision of services by the Company as follows:
1. Brandon Benton (Associate, Division Manager) and Aaron Silva (Associate, Division Manager) authorized up to the amount of $1,500,000, or as delegated.
2. Ed Noriega (Associate Principal, Division Manager), Pat Somerville (Associate Principal, Division Manager), Darin Johnson (Associate Principal, Division Manager) Ben Porter (Associate Principal, Division Manager) and Kimberly Post (CFO) are authorized up to the amount of $3,000,000, or as delegated.
3. Matt Brogan (Principal, Executive Vice President), Dave Moritz (Principal, Executive Vice President) Sasha Dansky (Principal, Executive Vice President), and Shawn O’Keefe (Principal, Executive Vice President) are authorized up to the amount of $10,000,000, or as delegated.
4. Zach Siviglia (Principal, President, CEO) is authorized up to the amount of $15,000,000, or as delegated.
5. Any contract in excess of $15,000,000 is subject to the review of the Board of Directors and will be signed by Zach Siviglia (Principal, President ,CEO).
The signature authority, contract limit authorization, and delegation approved by this resolution is made may be revoked at any time at the discretion of Zach Siviglia (Principal, President, CEO).
According to the records of the Company in my possession as of this date, the above is a true and correct copy of said resolution, said resolution has not been amended or repealed, and is in full force and effect.
DATED June 20, 2025 Matt Brogan, Secretary
- 1 -
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Mark Thomas will work with the City of Manteca (the City) to prepare and complete the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) phase, to review design alternatives, and develop project approval for the SR 120 Airport Way Interchange.
Mark Thomas will coordinate and facilitate conversations with Caltrans on completing the PA&ED phase, including alternatives analysis review. Based on initial review of alternatives, the L-9 alternative will likely be eliminated and the project will move forward with the Diverging Diamond Interchange. This scope of work assumes that the technical studies needed for this project and the SR 120 Main Street Interchange will be developed concurrently. This work also assumes that one alternative will be carried through environmental document.
The specific tasks within this scope of work are as follows:
TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT (WBS 100)
Task 1.1. Project Management (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) Mark Thomas will manage the project team, which includes managing the team, general project coordination with the City of Manteca -mail, making phone calls, preparing invoices and monthly progress report and maintaining project files. This task includes Mark Thomas' internal management of the subconsultant's work to insure we are one team submitting work products to the City.
DELIVERABLES
Coordination with stakeholders including, but not limited to, Caltrans, SJCOG, City of Manteca, and County of San Joaquin
Coordination with Subconsultants
Task 1.2. Coordination and Meetings (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15, 100.10.35)
Mark Thomas will establish a Caltrans Project Development Team (PDT) including members of the design team, City of Manteca, Caltrans, and other individuals critical to the project delivery. This task includes preparing agendas and summarizing the meeting notes, including action items. Action items will be tracked until resolved. This scope assumes a total of 24 virtual meetings over the anticipated 24-month schedule. We have assumed we will meet up to five times with other stakeholders, such as Caltrans, SJCOG, or the San Joaquin County
DELIVERABLES
Caltrans Project Development Team (PDT) Meetings (24)
Focus Meetings (5)
Meeting Notices
Meeting Agendas, Handouts/Exhibits, and Minutes
Executed Cooperative Agreement
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Task 1.3. Administration (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) Mark Thomas will maintain project files, this task includes managerial duties to keep the Project History file up to date and ensure a document management system is established.
DELIVERABLES
Project Master Files
Document Management System
Task 1.4. Schedule Control (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) Mark Thomas will update the Critical Path Schedule (CPM) on a monthly basis to track performance and identify issues that could either delay or accelerate the schedule. Each submittal will clearly be shown in the CPM and tracked for internal progress and external review periods. The CPM will be presented as a discussion item at each Project Development Team (PDT) meeting.
DELIVERABLES
Project Schedule and Monthly Updates
Task 1.5. Quality Control (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) The Mark Thomas Quality Control plan consists of established procedures for performing the work, including methods for design calculations, identification of regularly scheduled plan reviews, design checklists, and methods of project documentation. Specific methods for QA/QC will include:
The Mark Thomas Quality Assurance Manager will perform an independent review of the reports and design documents at each submittal for consistency, constructability, and accuracy. the reports and design plans, who checked the drafting, and when the final product was reviewed again by the design engineer.
Mark Thomas will implement and maintain these quality control procedures during the preparation of documents throughout the project.
DELIVERABLES
QA/QC Reviews
Comment Tracking and Resolution
Task 1.6. Cost Control (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) Mark Thomas will develop a roadmap to successfully implement a change in scope or fee and detailing how it will be executed and monitored to minimize disruption to the project schedule. Mark Thomas will prepare monthly progress reports that identify any risks to the project scope or fee.
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
DELIVERABLES
Change Management Plan
Monthly Progress Reports
Task 1.7. Public Information Control (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) Mark Thomas with the support of AIM Consulting will provide full-service community engagement to support the City of Manteca during the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED). The engagement program will ensure broad public awareness, inclusive participation, and meaningful input from residents, businesses, commuters, and stakeholders directly or indirectly affected by the improvements. All engagement activities will comply with Caltrans, FHWA, CEQA, and NEPA public involvement requirements.
Prepare Public Involvement Plan:
Prepare a Public Involvement Plan (PIP) detailing engagement methods, materials, schedule, and roles.
Identify stakeholder categories, equity priority areas, and community partners.
Develop an initial outreach database including businesses, property owners, schools, neighborhood groups, and civic organizations.
Participate in kickoff and early Project Development Team (PDT) meetings to align communication and documentation procedures.
Communication Collateral Development:
Develop and update project fact sheets, FAQs, and overview boards for workshops and briefings.
Produce flyers, mailers, social media graphics, and web content for each engagement round.
Create PowerPoint presentations, press releases, and digital templates for City use.
Ensure multilingual translation (e.g., Spanish and others as needed) and ADA accessibility.
Coordinate with City and Caltrans for content accuracy and branding compliance.
Engagement Activities:
Phase 1 - Awareness and Early Input:
Launch informational outreach via City and partner channels.
Host an introductory public information meeting or open house.
Distribute project flyers and social media content to raise awareness.
Gather feedback on key issues, including traffic congestion, safety, and pedestrian/bicycle needs.
Prepare a summary of comments and participation metrics.
Phase 2 - Alternatives Outreach:
Coordinate with engineering and environmental teams on alternatives display and traffic data summaries.
Conduct public workshops (up to 4) with interactive boards, visualizations, and surveys.
Host pop-up outreach (up to 3) events near the interchange corridors, schools, and local events.
Host up to 3 property owner/or stakeholder group meetings to inform input.
Maintain virtual engagement tools such as an online interactive map or questionnaire.
Document and categorize all feedback for environmental and design teams.
Phase 3 - Draft Environmental Document Review:
Prepare notices, mailers, and flyers in compliance with CEQA/NEPA requirements.
Host a public workshop (in-person and/or virtual).
Provide facilitation, sign-in management, translation, and comment tracking.
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Prepare response summary tables for inclusion in the environmental record.
Outreach Management and Coordination:
Serve as primary point of contact for community engagement throughout PA&ED.
Coordinate monthly outreach coordination meetings with the City, Caltrans, and consultant team.
Track and report engagement metrics, attendance, and feedback summaries.
Maintain a public comment log and participation database for reporting and audit purposes.
Manage outreach schedule, staff assignments, and production timelines.
Provide quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for all public-facing materials.
DELIVERABLES
Community Involvement Program
Public Surveys
Public Outreach Meetings and Materials
Social Media Communication
TASK 2. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDIES AND DRAFT
PROJECT REPORT (WBS 160)
Task 2.1. Review Updated Project Information (WBS 160.05) Mark Thomas will review existing information or anything that may have changed since PSR-PDS were and meet with the City to discuss any items that need to be addressed before team proceeds.
Task 2.2. Completion of the Caltrans ABC Process (WBS 160.10) Mark Thomas will submit A, B & C materials for Caltrans review and approval including a geometric control plan along with flight and camera calibration info provided by subconsultant Aerotech Mapping. Mark Thomas will set up to twelve (12) durable flight control points with crosses. Flight control will be set outside of the traveled way of SR 120.
Task 2.3. Utility Locations (WBS 160.10)
Mark Thomas will use the information gathered by the Utility "A" Letter process to identify potential utility conflicts.
We will contact the utility companies to help identify the costs of relocations and also make a preliminary determination of "prior rights" to establish the cost to be used in the Right-of-Way Data Sheet. Any potential utility policy exceptions will be identified in this phase, however processing the actual utility encroachment exception will be a final design task.
Due to the close proximity of Airport Way overcrossing to overhead transmission electric line and a transmission gas line, Mark Thomas will conduct 2 potholes on the gas line to confirm gas line alignment.
DELIVERABLES
Community Involvement Program
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Public Surveys
Public Outreach Meetings and Materials
Social Media Communication
Task 2.4. Engineering Studies (WBS 160.10)
Structures Advanced Planning Study (APS)
Mark Thomas will develop an additional Structure Advance Planning Studies (APS) for the bridge widening, retaining walls and bike path bridges for the Diverging Diamond Alternative. An APS Design Memo will document structure alternatives considered, construction staging, constructability, and assumed foundation type. A Preliminary Foundation Memo and square-foot cost estimates for each structure alternative will be included. The approved APS will be included as part of the Project Report.
Preliminary Geotechnical Design Report
Crawford will prepare a PGDR to provide preliminary geotechnical design recommendations for the project based on an initial evaluation of geologic hazards; review of previous Geotechnical Reports (if available), geologic maps, soil surveys, aerial photos; review of the project plans/alternatives; analysis; and a site visit. The report will include a summary of the expected subgrade and groundwater conditions; available boring data; expected excavatability and use of onsite materials as backfill; slope stability discussion; potential seismic hazards (liquefaction, surface fault rupture, seismic slope stability, lateral spreading); preliminary seismic and ground motion parameters; preliminary percolation values based on book values; and recommendations for future fieldwork and studies.
Crawford also included allowance for the Caltrans review process to respond to review comments if/as needed.
Following receipt of all draft PGDR review comments and concurrence with Caltrans, Crawford will prepare and submit a final PGDR incorporating the comments as necessary.
Bridge Preliminary Foundation Report
Crawford will prepare a Preliminary Foundation Report (PFR) for the overcrossing location that will address alternatives considered. Crawford will supplement the existing subsurface data by completing one boring near the bridge for the interchange improvements.
Crawford will prepare a Preliminary Foundation Report (PFR) for the overcrossing (consistent with current Caltrans guidelines/format) for review and comment by the design team. The report will provide a site/project description, summarize site geology and geologic reconnaissance, and available previous geotechnical data. Earth materials and foundation conditions will be discussed including seismic criteria and the design ARS curve. The report will discuss preliminary foundation types (e.g., spread footings, driven piling and cast-in-drilled-hole piling) and anticipated pile lengths; structure foundation conditions/constraints, and include construction considerations. The PFR will include the main overcrossing widening and the proposed on/off ramp bridges.
Crawford also included allowance for the Caltrans review process to respond to review comments if/as needed.
Following receipt of all draft PFR review comments and concurrence with Caltrans, Crawford will prepare and submit a final PFR incorporating the comments as necessary.
Assumption: No subsurface exploration will be completed.
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Initial Site Assessment
Crawford will prepare an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) to evaluate each project site and adjacent properties for evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) and/or potential RECs that may significantly impact the project. The ISA will be prepare
10. The ISA will include:
Review and discuss the project with the City of Manteca and the design team.
Review available project documents and reports, including APN parcel maps, site geology and ground water data, for evidence of suspected or known contamination/hazardous materials issues (such as pesticide usage, orchards, etc.).
Conduct a limited site reconnaissance to observe current land use and indications of potential contamination at the site, and to view publicly accessible portions of the adjacent properties.
Review owner representative provided information, if available, regarding past and present operations conducted on the property to assess the potential for RECs.
Review historical aerial photographs, topographic maps, and soil maps of the site and surrounding properties for indications of site use and potential sources of contamination.
Conduct a review of federal, state, and city records for indications of the use, misuse, or storage of hazardous and/or potentially hazardous materials on or near the site. The federal, state, and city database search will be provided by a professional record check service.
If warranted by the records search or site reconnaissance, reasonable attempts will be made to interview persons identified as knowledgeable about potentially contaminated locations within or adjacent to the project site to obtain information indicating their potential impacts to the project. Interviews may be conducted in person, by telephone, or in writing. Individuals interviewed might include owners, occupants, local government officials, or others.
Prepare a report summarizing the findings of our review, site reconnaissance, property owner interviews, historical photograph evaluation, and regulatory records review. We will address identified potential contamination and hazardous material impacts to provide recommendations and determine additional investigation and analysis.
Preliminary Materials Report
Crawford will complete a materials engineering evaluation, general following Caltrans guidelines. The PMR will include a project description; site description; existing pavement and other material conditions; summary of the previous geotechnical or materials studies/explorations, soils surveys, geologic maps used to develop the report; preliminary pavement section (utilizing the R-value tests from Task 2.3); preliminary corrosion considerations; and recommended field work and laboratory testing to be completed during future phases.
Crawford also included allowance for the Caltrans review process to respond to review comments if/as needed.
Following receipt of all Draft PMR review comments and concurrence with Caltrans, Crawford will prepare and submit a Final PMR incorporating the comments as necessary.
Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD)
During the refinement of the project alternatives Mark Thomas will identify features that do not meet current Caltrans Design Standards. Design exceptions will be required. Mark Thomas will prepare a draft Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD). The draft DSDD will be submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. The approved DSDD will be included as an attachment to the Draft Project Report because there is only one build alternative. A Design Information ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Bulletin 78 design checklist will be submitted with the GADs. The checklist documents conformance with applicable design standards. We anticipate one (1) review by Caltrans District 10 and a final review/ approval by Caltrans Headquarters Project Delivery Coordinator because both underlined and bold design exceptions are anticipated.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Recommended Alternatives
Mark Thomas will prepare the Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) using the current RealCost Version. We will follow the flowchart Figure 2-2 for Lane Widening to select the design life and pavement type.
Value Analysis
Mark Thomas will request an exception to prepare a Value Analysis. Mark Thomas as the ability to participate in a VA Study as needed. If a VA Study is required the 3rd party facilitator is not included as part of this scope.
DELIVERABLES
Structures Advanced Planning Study (APS)
Preliminary Geotechnical Design Report
Bridge Preliminary Foundation Report
Initial Site Assessment
Preliminary Materials Report
Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD)
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Recommended Alternatives
Value Analysis, or Exception
Task 2.5. Traffic Studies (WBS 160.10)
Traffic Management Plan
Consistent with Caltrans standards, Mark Thomas will prepare a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) checklist and for inclusion in the Project Report. This will include a review of traffic control restrictions, recommendations for anticipated lane closures, construction staging/traffic requirements, COZEEP requirements, and a review of construction strategies.
The TMP will be submitted to Caltrans for approval and will be included as an attachment to the Project Report.
Traffic Analysis Methodology
Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Traffic Analysis Assumptions and Methodology Memorandum that lists the assumptions and methodology for the data collection process, travel demand forecasting, intersection and freeway operations and safety analysis, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impact analysis and mitigation. After review by the project team, we will respond to one set of comments and provide a final Traffic Analysis Assumptions and Methodology Memorandum. The final memo will serve to update and refine the initial traffic analysis tasks outlined below.
Traffic Data Collection
Fehr & Peers will collect weekday peak period (6 to 9 AM and 3 to 6 PM) intersection turning movement counts for the following study intersections.
SR 120/Airport Way Interchange
1. Airport Way/Daniels Street
2. Airport Way/SR 120 Westbound Ramps
3. Airport Way/SR 120 Eastbound Ramps
4. Airport Way/Atherton Drive
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Intersection counts will also be collected at the following freeway interchange ramp terminal intersections to obtain ramp volumes for use in the freeway operations analysis.
McKinley Avenue/SR 120 Westbound Ramps
McKinley Avenue/SR 120 Eastbound Ramps
Union Road/SR 120 Westbound Ramps
Union Road/SR 120 Eastbound Ramps
The turning movement counts will be collected on a midweek day (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) while schools are in session and during fair weather. The counts will include heavy vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Fehr & Peers will also conduct field reconnaissance to observe AM and PM peak-period traffic operations at the study intersections listed above.
Fehr & Peers will collect weekday peak period (6 to 9 AM and 3 to 6 PM) volumes from the Caltrans Performance Measurement System (PeMS) database for the following freeway mainline and ramp locations.
Eastbound SR 120 between Yosemite Avenue and McKinley Avenue Eastbound SR 120 to northbound SR 99
Eastbound SR 120 to southbound SR 99
Northbound SR 99 to westbound SR 120
Southbound SR 99 to westbound SR 120
Fehr & Peers will request collision data from the most recent five-year period from Caltrans for the freeway mainline and ramps in the project area. We will request traffic signal timing plans for the existing signalized intersections from the City of Manteca and Caltrans.
Existing Conditions Analysis
Fehr & Peers will analyze traffic operations according to guidance from the Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition (2022). Signalized and stop-controlled intersections will be analyzed using the Synchro/SimTraffic traffic simulation analysis software so that the interaction of adjacent signalized intersection can be measured. Simulation analysis also provides more accurate estimates of queue length since storage lengths and the effect of queue blockage is specifically modeled. Following Caltrans District 10 process, the following measures of effectiveness will be reported for each turning movement: served volume, intersection delay, level of service, and 95th percentile queue length. Additionally, the following network wide performance measures will be reported:
Demand volume
Served volume
Percent demand served
Total stops
Stops per vehicle
Vehicle hours of delay
Vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
Vehicle hours of travel
Average speed
Fuel used
Total emissions
The SimTraffic analysis will be based on an average of 12 runs with each run recording a one-hour analysis period. The analysis period will consist of four 15-minute intervals with the PHF adjustment applied for the second interval and the anti-PHF adjustment applied for the other three intervals.
The freeway study segments will be analyzed using the HCS traffic analysis software that applies the HCM procedures to analyze basic, merge, diverge, and weave segments. The analysis segments for existing conditions are listed below.
Eastbound SR 120
McKinley Avenue Off-ramp (Diverge)
McKinley Avenue Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Westbound SR 120
SR 99 to Main Street (Basic)
Main Street Off-ramp (Diverge)
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
McKinley Avenue On-ramp (Merge)
Airport Way Off-ramp (Diverge)
Airport Way Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Airport Way to Union Road (Weave)
Union Road Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Union Road to Main Street (Weave)
Main Street Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Main Street On-ramp (Merge)
Main Street to SR 99 (Basic)
Main Street Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Main Street to Union Road (Weave)
Union Road Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Union Road to Airport Way (Weave)
Airport Way Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Airport Way On-ramp (Merge)
McKinley Avenue Off-ramp (Diverge)
McKinley Avenue Off to On-ramp (Basic)
McKinley Avenue On-ramp (Merge)
For each interchange, we will report the results for the subject interchange and the adjacent interchanges for the AM and PM peak hours. For example, the SR 120/Airport Way interchange analysis will report the results for the McKinley Avenue, Airport Way, and Union Road interchanges. The HCM methodology is an isolated analysis, so the recurrent congested conditions in the eastbound direction that extends from the SR 99 interchange into the study area will not be reflected in the analysis results for upstream segments. We will note where the analysis results do not match observed congested conditions.
Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Existing Conditions Report for each interchange that will document the data collection, traffic forecasts and operations analysis methodology, and existing conditions analysis results. After review by the project team, we will respond to one set of comments and prepare a final Existing Conditions Report for each interchange.
Traffic Forecasts
-county model (San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and
Merced) to prepare travel demand forecasts. Although the Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA) indicates that the three-city model (Lathrop, Manteca, and Ripon) would be used for the PA/ED phase, Caltrans District 10 staff have recently requested the three-county model for other interchange projects in the City of Lathrop. The three-city model tends to overestimate land use growth within its planning horizon, whereas the three-county model constrains land use growth, making it a more reasonable basis for sizing infrastructure improvements for a specified design year. We will review and update the roadway networks and land use inputs in the project vicinity for the base year model to match current conditions. The base year model will be validated to the collected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. The cumulative year model will be similarly reviewed in the project vicinity to ensure that planned roadway and land use changes are accounted for.
Using the existing traffic counts and the base and cumulative year forecast model volumes, Fehr & Peers will prepare opening year and design year traffic forecast volumes for the study intersections under the No Build and build alternatives during the AM and PM peak hours. Daily volume forecasts for SR 120, Airport Way, and Main Street will be prepared to support air quality analysis, noise analysis, and pavement design. The forecasting process will use the difference and ratio methods as appropriate according to guidance from NCHRP Report 765: Analytical Travel Forecasting Approaches for Project-Level Planning and Design (2014). The intersection forecasts will be prepared for the No Build Alternative and one build alternative for each interchange.
Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Travel Demand Model Validation and Forecasting Memorandum for each interchange that will document the base year model validation and the traffic forecasts for the study intersections and freeway segments. After review by the project team, we will respond to one set of comments and prepare a final Travel Demand Model Validation and Forecasting Memorandum for each interchange.
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Future Conditions Analysis
Starting with the traffic operations models developed for existing conditions, Fehr & Peers will develop opening year and design year intersection operations analysis models in the Synchro/SimTraffic software. AM and PM peak hour conditions will be analyzed for the No Build and one build alternative for each interchange. Similarly, opening year and design year freeway analysis models will be developed in the HCS software. AM and PM peak hour conditions will be analyzed for the No Build and one build alternative for each interchange.
Fehr & Peers will conduct a multimodal assessment for one build alternative at each interchange. The effect of the proposed alternatives on the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit system will be discussed. Fehr & Peers will determine the ramp meter storage requirements according to the Ramp Meter Design Manual guidance according to passenger vehicle and truck volumes.
current ISOAP evaluation is not expected to be required and is thus not included in this work plan.
Traffic Operations Analysis Report
Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Traffic Operations Analysis Report for each interchange that documents the data collection, traffic forecasts, and traffic operations analysis. Fehr & Peers assumes that the traffic analysis findings will be integrated into the CEQA and/or NEPA documents by others. After review by the project team, Fehr & Peers will respond to one set of comments and prepare the final Traffic Operations Analysis Report. The draft and final reports will be submitted in Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF formats.
VMT Analysis and Mitigation
As part of the PID process, Fehr & Peers provided preliminary induced VMT forecasts for the VMT Decision Documents (VMTDDs). The method for the VMTDDs was the California Induced Travel Calculator, which is only capable of producing a positive forecast when a project is increasing Class 1, 2, or 3 lane miles. As a result, the method may not fully capture the unique context of interchange improvements and may overstate the induced VMT effect.
As a first item of work, Fehr & Peers will conduct an updated review of the previous VMTDD results and provide a summary of the strengths and limitations of the Calculator methodology as well as a description of the alternative methodology of using the SJCOG regional travel demand model. The results will be presented to the PDT to determine the preferred method. If the PDT determines that the elasticity method is the appropriate approach, Fehr & Peers will update the calculations based on the latest version of the Calculator. If the SJCOG model methodology is selected, it would trigger Optional Task.
Safety Assessment
Fehr & Peers will use safety analysis methods from the Highway Safety Manual (AASHTO, 2010) to evaluate and support preferred alternatives are selected, the safety analysis will be conducted for specific design exceptions identified by the Modification Factor Clearinghouse, to document the potential difference in safety performance between the proposed design feature and the standard feature. In circumstances where CMFs are not available, a qualitative assessment will be provided. The result of this analysis will be a memorandum documenting the findings organized by non-standard design features.
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Cost Planning
Fehr & Peers will prepare preliminary construction cost estimates for electrical transportation elements of the proposed SR 120/Airport Way and SR 120/Main Street interchanges. This includes estimates for traffic signal installations, modifications, and removals; highway and street lighting systems; ramp metering systems; fiber optic cable systems; CCTV camera systems; changeable message signs; traffic monitoring station systems; and weather stations.
DELIVERABLES
Traffic Management Plan Checklist
Existing Traffic Analysis Conditions Report
Traffic Forecasts/Modeling
Future Conditions Analysis
Travel Demand Model Validation and Forecasting Memorandum Traffic Operations Analysis Assumptions and Methodology Memorandum (TOAR) Updated Review of VMT Decision Documents (VMTDDs)
Forecast VMT Using Travel Demand Model (optional)
Safety Assessment
Safety Analysis to Support the Selection of Preferred Alternative Task 2.6. Hydraulic/Hydrology Studies (WBS 160.10)
Drainage Report
Mark Thomas will obtain all relevant drainage information, including storm drain facilities, ditches, pipe location and sizes, local rainfall intensities and flows. A hydrologic analysis will be completed to develop watershed boundaries for the areas draining to this project, flows based on Caltrans standards, and preliminary drainage concepts.
A drainage report will be developed based on Caltrans guidelines. The report will include, but not be limited to, detailed discussions of the following: existing conditions, off-site hydrology and hydraulics, onsite roadway drainage, existing and post project drainage patterns, storm water quality, and other topics of significance.
Storm Water Data Report
Mark Thomas will prepare a Storm Water Data Report in accordance with Caltrans procedures based on information collected in the Drainage Report.
DELIVERABLES
Storm Water Data Report
Hydraulics/Hydrology Drainage Report
Task 2.7. Right of Way Requirements (WBS 160.10)
Mapping and Exhibits
Mark Thomas will prepare Right of Way requirements exhibits as well as utility conflict maps to be used to develop the Right of Way Data Sheet.
Right of Way Data Sheet
Monument will coordinate with the design team to identify right-of-way acquisitions resulting from the proposed improvements. Additionally, Monument will provide information about existing conditions within the project limits including, land use, and any existing rights or encumbrances known to exist on the affected properties. The specific steps Monument will take to determine impacts and estimate costs are as follows:
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Perform a GIS analysis to identify property and rights potentially affected by the proposed design Use publicly available data and other real estate resources to confirm the ownership, land use, zoning, lot size, and improvements for each affected property.
Perform a desktop inspection of properties to confirm the probable acquisition type (fee, easement, temporary construction easement, etc.) including identifying existing uses or personal property to be relocated (if any).
Calculate the fee and/or easement area (including temporary construction easements) that will need to be acquired for each impacted property using design data and assessor boundary information.
Estimate the total capital cost of acquisition for all parcels including real estate costs, relocation assistance, severance damages, loss of goodwill, fixtures and equipment, demolition and clearance.
Estimate permit costs.
Estimate the total support cost for all parcels including appraisal fees, condemnation costs, title and escrow fees, environmental fees, and consultant fees as necessary.
Escalate costs to anticipated right-of-way acquisition date.
Prepare a draft Caltrans Right of Way Data Sheet using Caltrans Exhibit 17-EX-21 (Right of Way Data Sheet for Local Public Agencies) for the Build Alternatives.
Update the RWDS based on comments from the design team and the City and submit a final Draft RWDS.
Respond to comments from Caltrans R/W as necessary and make required updates to the Data Sheets.
DELIVERABLES
Right of Way Data Sheet
Utility Conflict Maps (30%)
Right of Way Needs Summary/Exhibit
Property Access Rights for Environmental/Engineering Studies Task 2.8. Draft Project Report (WBS 160.15)
Mark Thomas will prepare the Draft and Final Project Report (PR) for distribution, review and approval by the City, Caltrans, and selected PDT members.
As a first item of work, Mark Thomas will update the Risk Register to include items such as VMT or any other items that may need to be updated. This risk register will be reviewed by the PDT and will be updated again prior to the draft submittal of the Project Report.
Concurrent with environmental document submittals, we will prepare the Project Report (PR) for distribution, review and approval by Caltrans, and the rest of the PDT. The PR will be prepared in conformance with Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual latest guidelines and format style will include the supporting information (GADs, Traffic Studies, Cost Estimates, etc.) listed above.
Mark Thomas will prepare a design exhibit that highlights project geometric layout, lane configurations, signal locations, preliminary drainage, and potential utility conflicts.
The Draft PR requests approval to circulate environmental document, it will be submitted in Draft Form (full District circulation), Draft Final (limited, management review) and Final Form (District circulation copies), for a total of three submittals.
DELIVERABLES
Draft Project Report
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Cost Estimates for Alternatives
Geometric Approval Drawings for Recommended Alternatives Risk Register
Design Exhibit
Task 2.9. Land Surveys (WBS 160.20)
Task 2.9.1. Land Net Surveys
Mark Thomas will complete a boundary survey to delineate the existing right of way for SR120 and Airport Way. Mark Thomas will conduct record research at the County and with Caltrans to obtain record maps. Monuments identified on record maps along with other physical evidence will be located in the field to aid in the retracement for right of way and parcel lines impacted by the project. It is assumed that up to twelve (12) parcels along the right of way will be impacted and up to twelve (12) preliminary title reports will be ordered by Mark Thomas to review and plot all encumbrances and easements shown in the title reports. The boundary survey completed for this task will be known as Task 2.9.2. Control Surveys
Mark Thomas will base the project control on the California Coordinate System of 1983 (CCS83), Zone 3, Epoch 2017.50 and vertically upon the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Mark Thomas will set up to twelve (12) flight panels for aerial mapping. The control set for this task will be a part of the Caltrans B submittal for Aerotriangulation Adjustment Report and Ground point file. Horizontal values for project control and flight panels will be collected with GPS methods and elevations will be determined by a closed level loop.
Task 2.9.3. Aerial Surveys
Mark Thomas will coordinate with subconsultant Aerotech Mapping to complete aerial mapping along SR120 at Airport Street. The flight will adhere to Caltrans ABC Photogrammetric Mapping standards and will undergo Caltrans review and approval.
Task 2.9.4. Supplemental Topo
Mark Thomas will collect supplemental topography of existing bridge vertical clearance and identified utilities. Field surveys and survey work products will be completed in conformance with the current edition (with updates) of the Caltrans Survey Manual. Mark Thomas will combine aerial photogrammetric mapping and supplemental field topography to develop a digital terrain model for the project. This scope of work is limited to three (3) days of field work.
Task 2.10. Environmental Study Request (WBS 160.30)
Mark Thomas will prepare mapping for the environmental study request. This mapping will include project impact maps as well as compiled survey data to be used in the technical studies. This also includes any access right to enter to conduct any environmental studies.
DELIVERABLES
Mapping for Environmental Study Report
Surveys and Mapping for Environmental Studies
Property Access Rights for Environmental/Engineering Studies ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
TASK 3. ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENTATION (WSB 165)
Task 3.1. Environmental Document Initiation/Project Description (WBS 165.25) The Mark Thomas team will draft a CEQA/NEPA project description with supporting figures. The project description will include the purpose and need statement, project construction and operational information, project background, and setting information. It is assumed there will be one of the project description from the City and one from the PDT, for a total of three submittals.
DELIVERABLES
Project Description
Area of Potential Effects Map (APE)
Task 3.2. Technical Studies (WBS 165.25)
To support the CEQA/NEPA clearance, we anticipate Caltrans will require the following technical studies. For the purposes of this scope and fee, we have assumed a limited number of hours to respond to Caltrans comments on technical reports. If Caltrans reviewers require multiple rounds of review, additional reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis.
Task 3.2.1. CIA
The Mark Thomas team will complete a Community Impact Assessment using the latest template available from the Caltrans SER. The draft CIA will include analysis of all relevant topics, including land use, parks and recreation, farmlands/timberlands, growth, population and housing, economics, environmental justice, and equity. The CIA will also include a summary of Section 4(f)/6(f) analysis.
Task 3.2.2. VIA
The Mark Thomas team will prepare the required VIA checklist/questionnaire for Caltrans review and concurrence. For the purposes of this scope, we assume the project will score between 19 and 28, requiring preparation of a VIA Memorandum. Accordingly, Mark Thomas will prepare the VIA for Caltrans review. The VIA Memorandum will follow all Caltrans requirements and will be in Caltrans format. A licensed landscape architect will oversee the preparation of the VIA questionnaire and VIA Memorandum. Up to two visual simulations are proposed.
Task 3.2.3. Section 4(f)
4(f)/6(f) memorandum that documents potential resources near the project and demonstrates no use.
Task 3.2.4. Other Technical Studies
Air Quality/GHG: LSA will prepare an Air Quality Report (AQR) that documents the study results consistent with Caltrans SER AQR Annotated Outline. Construction related air pollutant emissions will be quantified using California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) or another appropriate model as directed by Caltrans. Caltrans Standard Specifications for Construction, as well as mitigation measures, if necessary, will be recommended to reduce short-term, construction related impacts. Operational air pollutant emissions will also be quantified using CalEEMod, CT-EMFAC, or another ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
appropriate model as directed by Caltrans. The greenhouse gas (GHG) analysis would be based on the SER Climate Change Annotated Outline for a capacity increasing project and/or the most recent guidance available from Caltrans related to GHG emissions and climate change analysis requirements. This task will start after preparation of the traffic analysis.
LSA will prepare an Air Quality Conformity Analysis (AQCA) consistent with the most recent SER Air Quality Conformity Analysis Annotated Outline. LSA will prepare the associated AQCA Cover Letter and Air Quality Conformity Findings Checklist. LSA will prepare the PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis Project Summary Form for Interagency Consultation to allow the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) and the San Joaquin Valley Interagency Consultation Group (ICG) to determine whether a project requires a project-level PM hot-spot analysis pursuant to Federal Conformity Regulations, and to confirm that the project is not a Project of Air Quality Concern (POAQC). This scope assumes the preparation of a quantitative PM10 and PM2.5 Hot-Spot assessment would not be required. A qualitative Mobile Source Air Toxic (MSAT) analysis will be prepared according to FHWA Updated Interim Guidance on Mobile Source Air Toxic Analysis in NEPA Documents.
LSA will schedule and participate in an Interagency Consultation meeting, and will assist in the preparation of meeting analysis will be at the presentation to assist
with any traffic-related questions. To support the required 30-day public review period, LSA will prepare a draft public notice. Fees for the public notice will be the responsibility of Caltrans.
Biological Resources: LSA will conduct a records search of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) request from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) online system to identify sensitive or special-status biological resources that have been reported from the project vicinity and may have potential to occur within the biological study area.
An LSA biologist familiar with the habitats and biological resources of the region will conduct a general walkover field survey of the biological study area (i.e., project site plus 100-foot buffer oneach side of the alignment, where access is available or viewed with binoculars from the property boundary where not accessible) to assess and map habitat conditions and record general plant and wildlife observations. The project is located within an urban corridor in the City of Manteca. In a review of available aerial photographs, there is open space within the interchange and the interchange birds, and roosting bats.
LSA will prepare a Natural Environment Study-Minimal Impacts (NES-MI) to document the results of the literature review and field surveys. The NES-
(SER) template dated August 2022, or the most recent guidance available from Caltrans. The NES-MI will include a discussion of plant communities present in the biological study area, as well as a discussion of common plant and animal species occurring (or expected to occur) in the biological study area based on the plant communities present. A generalized vegetation map will be prepared showing plant community types as well as the locations of any sensitive biological resources incidentally observed during the survey. The NES-MI will include an assessment of project impacts on biological resources, and will recommend mitigation measures, where appropriate. Any special status species incidentally observed during the survey will be reported to the CNDDB. This scope of work does not include focused surveys for special-status species. If these surveys are needed, a budget augment will be requested Cultural Resources: LSA will conduct cultural resource technical studies to address requirements of Section 106 and CEQA. LSA assumes the project will require preparation of an Area of Potential Effects (APE), Archaeological Survey ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Report (ASR), a Historical Resources Evaluation report (HRER), and a Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) in order to project will occur concurrently with the field review for Project 2 (SR 120/Main Street).
On behalf of Caltrans, LSA will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento for a review of the Sacred Lands File to determine if the APE contains any listed sites. LSA will also request a list of geographically affiliated Native American tribes that may have information or concerns about the project. LSA will provide the contacted by letter and follow-up email to solicit input, and compilation of separate administrative records.
LSA assumes preparing Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 Series records for a minimum of five (5) built environmental cultural resources, as appropriate. This number may change pending the outcome of consultation with the Caltrans Architectural Historian. LSA will update the DPR 523 Series records for a minimum of ten (10) built environmental cultural resources, as appropriate, identified in the previous studies that are in the APE. The updates will include an evaluation for listing in the NHRP. The newly prepared and updated DPRs will be appended to the HRER.
If additional built environment resources are identified within or adjacent to the APE, Caltrans requires updating existing DPRs of other built environment resources in the APE, or Caltrans requires other related cultural resource technical studies to address built environment resources, LSA will develop a scope and budget to address the additional required study and prepare draft/final documentation per Caltrans and OHP guidelines.
Based on currently available information, LSA believes a Finding of Effect (FOE) document to address historic properties is not required. If required, a supplemental scope and budget would be necessary.
Energy:
construction and operation of the project, including diesel and gasoline fuel use for off road construction equipment, on road construction vehicles, and operational vehicle trips. LSA will prepare an Energy Memorandum summarizing this analysis.
Noise: LSA will prepare a Noise Study Report (NSR) consistent with the April 2020 Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013 Technical Noise Supplement (TeNS), and the annotated outline provided by the Caltrans SER.
The NSR will identify traffic noise impacts on land uses located adjacent to the proposed project. The areas with potential traffic noise impacts under the design year with project scenario will be identified using land use information, aerial photographs, and field reconnaissance. A discussion of any existing sensitive uses and approved future uses in the project vicinity will be included.
Ambient noise level measurements will be conducted to establish the existing noise environment at representative receptor locations adjacent to the interchange. Up to two long-term (24-hour) and up to 16 short-term (20-minute) noise level measurements will be made to document the existing noise environment and to calibrate the traffic noise model. Observations of other noise sources, barriers, terrains, building heights, and other site-specific information will be noted during each measurement period.
Noise impacts from construction sources will be analyzed based on the equipment expected to be used, length of a specific construction task, equipment power type (gasoline or diesel engine), horsepower, load factor, and percentage of time in use. The construction noise impact will be evaluated in terms of maximum levels (Lmax) and the frequency of occurrence at adjacent receptor locations. Analysis requirements will be based on the sensitivity of the project study area and the Noise Ordinance specifications of San Joaquin County and the City of Manteca, as well as Caltrans Standard Specifications in Section 14-8.02.
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
The FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM), Version 2.5, will be used to evaluate the traffic noise levels associated with the Existing, Future No Build, and one Build Alternative. The TNM 2.5 model will be calibrated using the short-term noise level measurements and concurrent traffic counts to ensure the accuracy of the noise model. The existing and designyear (future) traffic conditions will assume either the worst noise- hour traffic volumes or the peak-hour traffic volumes provided in the traffic study, whichever is less. The traffic mix for the noise model will be obtained from the traffic study or traffic counts during noise levels measurements. Traffic noise impacts will be determined based on the design year with project traffic noise levels and the corresponding NAC for each land use.
Noise abatement measures (noise barriers) designed to reduce long-term traffic noise impacts by 5 dBA or more, as required to be feasible, will be evaluated. A reasonable allowance per residence and total reasonable allowance per residence will be calculated for each noise barrier height. LSA will prepare a Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) consistent with the April 2020 Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol and the annotated outline provided by the Caltrans SER. The preliminary noise abatement decision, and secondary effects of abatement (impacts on cultural resources, scenic views, hazardous materials, and biology) will be provided.
Paleontology: LSA will prepare a combined Paleontological Identification Report/Paleontological Evaluation Report (PIR/PER) to address the potential for paleontological resources to occur within the anticipated disturbance limits, both horizontal and vertical, and be impacted by project activities. All tasks and documents will be consistent with the standards set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP), current industry best practices, and the guidelines in the Caltrans SER, Chapter 8: Paleontology. The paleontological survey will be conducted at the same time as the cultural resources survey by a paleontologist or an archaeologist who is cross-trained in identifying paleontological resources.
DELIVERABLES
Air Quality Report and an Air Quality Conformity Analysis Air Quality Conformity Cover Letter
Air Quality Conformity Findings Checklist
Noise Study Report (NSR)
Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR)
Community Impact Assessment (CIA) Memorandum
Natural Environment Study-Minimal Impacts (NES-MI)
Area of Potential Effects
Archeological Study Report (ASR)
Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER)
Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR)
Energy Memorandum
Combined Paleontological Identification report/Paleontological Evaluation Report (PIR/PER) Climate Change Study and Technical Energy Memorandum
Water Quality Memorandum
Visual Impact Assessment Memorandum
Department of Parks and Recreation Cultural Forms (Up to 5) Section 4(f)/6(f) Memorandum
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Task 3.3. Environmental Document (WBS 165.25)
Task 3.3.1. Draft Environmental Document
The Mark Thomas team will prepare the draft IS/EA. We will prepare the draft environmental document using the most recent annotated outlines from the Caltrans SER. We anticipate the following rounds of review prior to public circulation:
City review (1)
Caltrans generalist review (1)
Caltrans technical team review/NEPA compliance review (1) Caltrans Senior review (1)
Caltrans Office Chief (1)
After the above rounds of review are complete, Mark Thomas will prepare the public review draft IS/EA. This will include required 508 compliance editing of the documents, a necessary step to ensure the documents can be posted online.
Mark Thomas will support the City and Caltrans in preparing and planning for required notices. We anticipate that one newspaper add will be run one time, and that no mailers or similar printed notices will be required. We will provide web-ready versions of the notices and envir
Task 3.3.2. Public Review
Mark Thomas will review public comments and prepare response to comments.
DELIVERABLES
Draft CEQA IS/MND
Draft NEPA EA
Respond to Comments /Mitigation Monitoring Response Program (RTC/MMRP) TASK 4. OBTAIN PERMITS, LICENSES, AGREEMENTS AND
CERTIFICATIONS (PLACS) (WBS 170)
Task 4.1. Permits (WBS 170.10)
Mark Thomas will prepare and submit an encroachment permit to Caltrans. This will allow the project team to conduct field surveys in Caltrans right of way.
DELIVERABLES
Caltrans Encroachment Permit
Task 4.2. Freeway Agreement (WBS 170.20)
Mark Thomas will assist in initial discussions around the freeway agreement with Caltrans. As needed, Mark Thomas will assist the City with any updates to the freeway agreement that may be needed. Freeway agreements would be executed in PS&E Phase.
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Task 4.3. Maintenance Agreement (WBS 170.30)
Mark Thomas will assist in initial discussions around the maintenance agreement with Caltrans. Mark Thomas will assist the City with the updated maintenance agreement. Maintenance agreements would be executed in PS&E Phase.
TASK 5. CIRCULATE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT AND
SELECT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE (WBS 175)
Task 5.1. Analyzation and selection of the most feasible alternative (WBS 175) Mark Thomas will prepare a memo analyzing the project alternatives for the City to review. Alternative analysis will include but not limited to costs, schedule, funding opportunities, mitigation strategy, interchange configuration, bridge widening direction, and bicycled and pedestrian improvements.
DELIVERABLES
Alternative Analysis Memo
TASK 6. PREPARE AND APPROVE PROJECT REPORT AND FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (WBS 180)
Task 6.1. Prepare Final Project Report (WBS 180.05)
Mark Thomas will prepare the Final Project Report (PR) for distribution, review and approval by the City, Caltrans, and selected PDT members.
Concurrent with environmental document submittals, we will prepare the Project Report (PR) for distribution, review and approval by Caltrans, and the rest of the PDT. The PR will be prepared in conformance with Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual latest guidelines and format style will include the supporting information (GADs, Traffic Studies, Cost Estimates, etc.) listed above.
The Final PR requests approval of project. The reports will be submitted in Draft Form (full District circulation), Draft Final (limited, management review) and Final Form (District circulation copies), for a total of three submittals.
DELIVERABLES
Final Project Report
Final GAD
Task 6.2. Final Environmental Document (WBS 180.15)
ATTACHMENT 3
Airport Way Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
The Mark Thomas team will prepare a response to comments for a limited number of public comments; if the amount or complexity of comments received exceeds what we have budgeted, an augment will be required. We will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
Final IS/EA: Mark Thomas will prepare a final IS/EA for City and Caltrans review. We anticipate the following:
City review (1)
Caltrans generalist and technical review (1)
Caltrans Senior review (1)
Caltrans Office Chief (1)
Mark Thomas will also prepare one draft and one final Environmental Commitments Record in a format/template to be provided by Caltrans.
DELIVERABLES
Final IS/MND
Final NEPA EA
Environmental Commitment Record
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Mark Thomas will work with the City of Manteca (the City) to prepare and complete the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) phase, to review design alternatives, and develop project approval for the SR 120 Main Street Interchange.
Mark Thomas will coordinate and facilitate conversations with Caltrans on completing the PA&ED phase, including alternatives analysis review. Based on initial review of alternatives, the L-9 alternative will likely be eliminated and the project will move forward with the Diverging Diamond Interchange. This scope of work assumes that the technical studies needed for this project and the SR 120 Main Street Interchange will be developed concurrently. This work also assumes that one alternative will be carried through environmental document.
The specific tasks within this scope of work are as follows:
TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT (WBS 100)
Task 1.1. Project Management (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) Mark Thomas will manage the project team, which includes managing the team, general project coordination with the City of Manteca -mail, making phone calls, preparing invoices and monthly progress report and maintaining project files. This task includes Mark Thomas' internal management of the subconsultant's work to insure we are one team submitting work products to the City.
DELIVERABLES
Coordination with stakeholders including, but not limited to, Caltrans, SJCOG, City of Manteca, and County of San Joaquin
Coordination with Subconsultants
Task 1.2. Coordination and Meetings (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15, 100.10.35)
Mark Thomas will establish a Caltrans Project Development Team (PDT) including members of the design team, City of Manteca, Caltrans, and other individuals critical to the project delivery. This task includes preparing agendas and summarizing the meeting notes, including action items. Action items will be tracked until resolved. This scope assumes a total of 24 virtual meetings over the anticipated 24-month schedule. We have assumed we will meet up to five times with other stakeholders, such as Caltrans, SJCOG, or the San Joaquin County
DELIVERABLES
Caltrans Project Development Team (PDT) Meetings (24)
Focus Meetings (5)
Meeting Notices
Meeting Agendas, Handouts/Exhibits, and Minutes
Executed Cooperative Agreement
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Task 1.3. Administration (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) Mark Thomas will maintain project files, this task includes managerial duties to keep the Project History file up to date and ensure a document management system is established.
DELIVERABLES
Project Master Files
Document Management System
Task 1.4. Schedule Control (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) Mark Thomas will update the Critical Path Schedule (CPM) on a monthly basis to track performance and identify issues that could either delay or accelerate the schedule. Each submittal will clearly be shown in the CPM and tracked for internal progress and external review periods. The CPM will be presented as a discussion item at each Project Development Team (PDT) meeting.
DELIVERABLES
Project Schedule and Monthly Updates
Task 1.5. Quality Control (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) The Mark Thomas Quality Control plan consists of established procedures for performing the work, including methods for design calculations, identification of regularly scheduled plan reviews, design checklists, and methods of project documentation. Specific methods for QA/QC will include:
The Mark Thomas Quality Assurance Manager will perform an independent review of the reports and design documents at each submittal for consistency, constructability, and accuracy. the reports and design plans, who checked the drafting, and when the final product was reviewed again by the design engineer.
Mark Thomas will implement and maintain these quality control procedures during the preparation of documents throughout the project.
DELIVERABLES
QA/QC Reviews
Comment Tracking and Resolution
Task 1.6. Cost Control (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) Mark Thomas will develop a roadmap to successfully implement a change in scope or fee and detailing how it will be executed and monitored to minimize disruption to the project schedule. Mark Thomas will prepare monthly progress reports that identify any risks to the project scope or fee.
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
DELIVERABLES
Change Management Plan
Monthly Progress Reports
Task 1.7. Public Outreach (WBS 100.10.05, 100.10.10, 100.10.15) Mark Thomas with the support of AIM Consulting will provide full-service community engagement to support the City of Manteca during the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED). The engagement program will ensure broad public awareness, inclusive participation, and meaningful input from residents, businesses, commuters, and stakeholders directly or indirectly affected by the improvements. All engagement activities will comply with Caltrans, FHWA, CEQA, and NEPA public involvement requirements.
Prepare Public Involvement Plan:
Prepare a Public Involvement Plan (PIP) detailing engagement methods, materials, schedule, and roles.
Identify stakeholder categories, equity priority areas, and community partners.
Develop an initial outreach database including businesses, property owners, schools, neighborhood groups, and civic organizations.
Participate in kickoff and early Project Development Team (PDT) meetings to align communication and documentation procedures.
Communication Collateral Development:
Develop and update project fact sheets, FAQs, and overview boards for workshops and briefings.
Produce flyers, mailers, social media graphics, and web content for each engagement round.
Create PowerPoint presentations, press releases, and digital templates for City use.
Ensure multilingual translation (e.g., Spanish and others as needed) and ADA accessibility.
Coordinate with City and Caltrans for content accuracy and branding compliance.
Engagement Activities:
Phase 1 - Awareness and Early Input:
Launch informational outreach via City and partner channels.
Host an introductory public information meeting or open house.
Distribute project flyers and social media content to raise awareness.
Gather feedback on key issues, including traffic congestion, safety, and pedestrian/bicycle needs.
Prepare a summary of comments and participation metrics.
Phase 2 - Alternatives Outreach:
Coordinate with engineering and environmental teams on alternatives display and traffic data summaries.
Conduct public workshops (up to 4) with interactive boards, visualizations, and surveys.
Host pop-up outreach (up to 3) events near the interchange corridors, schools, and local events.
Host up to 3 property owner/or stakeholder group meetings to inform input.
Maintain virtual engagement tools such as an online interactive map or questionnaire.
Document and categorize all feedback for environmental and design teams.
Phase 3 - Draft Environmental Document Review:
Prepare notices, mailers, and flyers in compliance with CEQA/NEPA requirements.
Host a public workshop (in-person and/or virtual).
Provide facilitation, sign-in management, translation, and comment tracking.
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Prepare response summary tables for inclusion in the environmental record.
Outreach Management and Coordination:
Serve as primary point of contact for community engagement throughout PA&ED.
Coordinate monthly outreach coordination meetings with the City, Caltrans, and consultant team.
Track and report engagement metrics, attendance, and feedback summaries.
Maintain a public comment log and participation database for reporting and audit purposes.
Manage outreach schedule, staff assignments, and production timelines.
Provide quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for all public-facing materials.
DELIVERABLES
Community Involvement Program
Public Surveys
Public Outreach Meetings and Materials
Social Media Communication
TASK 2. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDIES AND DRAFT
PROJECT REPORT (WBS 160)
Task 2.1. Review Updated Project Information (WBS 160.05) Mark Thomas will review existing information or anything that may have changed since PSR-PDS were and meet with the City to discuss any items that need to be addressed before team proceeds.
Task 2.2. Completion of the Caltrans ABC Process (WBS 160.10) Mark Thomas will submit A, B & C materials for Caltrans review and approval including a geometric control plan along with flight and camera calibration info provided by subconsultant Aerotech Mapping. Mark Thomas will set up to twelve (12) durable flight control points with crosses. Flight control will be set outside of the traveled way of SR 120.
Task 2.3. Utility Locations (WBS 160.10)
Mark Thomas will use the information gathered by the Utility "A" Letter process to identify potential utility conflicts.
We will contact the utility companies to help identify the costs of relocations and also make a preliminary determination of "prior rights" to establish the cost to be used in the Right-of-Way Data Sheet. Any potential utility policy exceptions will be identified in this phase, however processing the actual utility encroachment exception will be a final design task.
DELIVERABLES
Community Involvement Program
Public Surveys
Public Outreach Meetings and Materials
Social Media Communication
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Task 2.4. Engineering Studies (WBS 160.10)
Structures Advanced Planning Study (APS)
Mark Thomas will develop an additional Structure Advance Planning Studies (APS) for the bridge widening, retaining walls and bike path bridges for the Diverging Diamond Alternative. An APS Design Memo will document structure alternatives considered, construction staging, constructability, and assumed foundation type. A Preliminary Foundation Memo and square-foot cost estimates for each structure alternative will be included. The approved APS will be included as part of the Project Report.
Preliminary Geotechnical Design Report
Crawford will prepare a PGDR to provide preliminary geotechnical design recommendations for the project based on an initial evaluation of geologic hazards; review of previous Geotechnical Reports (if available), geologic maps, soil surveys, aerial photos; review of the project plans/alternatives; analysis; and a site visit. The report will include a summary of the expected subgrade and groundwater conditions; available boring data; expected excavatability and use of onsite materials as backfill; slope stability discussion; potential seismic hazards (liquefaction, surface fault rupture, seismic slope stability, lateral spreading); preliminary seismic and ground motion parameters; preliminary percolation values based on book values; and recommendations for future fieldwork and studies.
Crawford also included allowance for the Caltrans review process to respond to review comments if/as needed.
Following receipt of all draft PGDR review comments and concurrence with Caltrans, Crawford will prepare and submit a final PGDR incorporating the comments as necessary.
Bridge Preliminary Foundation Report
Crawford will prepare a Preliminary Foundation Report (PFR) for the overcrossing location that will address alternatives considered. Crawford will supplement the existing subsurface data by completing one boring near the bridge for the interchange improvements.
Crawford will prepare a Preliminary Foundation Report (PFR) for the overcrossing (consistent with current Caltrans guidelines/format) for review and comment by the design team. The report will provide a site/project description, summarize site geology and geologic reconnaissance, and available previous geotechnical data. Earth materials and foundation conditions will be discussed including seismic criteria and the design ARS curve. The report will discuss preliminary foundation types (e.g., spread footings, driven piling and cast-in-drilled-hole piling) and anticipated pile lengths; structure foundation conditions/constraints, and include construction considerations. The PFR will include the main overcrossing widening and the proposed on/off ramp bridges.
Crawford also included allowance for the Caltrans review process to respond to review comments if/as needed.
Following receipt of all draft PFR review comments and concurrence with Caltrans, Crawford will prepare and submit a final PFR incorporating the comments as necessary.
Assumption is no subsurface explorations will be completed.
Initial Site Assessment
Crawford will prepare an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) to evaluate each project site and adjacent properties for evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) and/or potential RECs that may significantly impact the project. The ISA will be prepare
10. ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
The ISA will include:
Review and discuss the project with the City of Manteca and the design team.
Review available project documents and reports, including APN parcel maps, site geology and ground water data, for evidence of suspected or known contamination/hazardous materials issues (such as pesticide usage, orchards, etc.).
Conduct a limited site reconnaissance to observe current land use and indications of potential contamination at the site, and to view publicly accessible portions of the adjacent properties.
Review owner representative provided information, if available, regarding past and present operations conducted on the property to assess the potential for RECs.
Review historical aerial photographs, topographic maps, and soil maps of the site and surrounding properties for indications of site use and potential sources of contamination.
Conduct a review of federal, state, and city records for indications of the use, misuse, or storage of hazardous and/or potentially hazardous materials on or near the site. The federal, state, and city database search will be provided by a professional record check service.
If warranted by the records search or site reconnaissance, reasonable attempts will be made to interview persons identified as knowledgeable about potentially contaminated locations within or adjacent to the project site to obtain information indicating their potential impacts to the project. Interviews may be conducted in person, by telephone, or in writing. Individuals interviewed might include owners, occupants, local government officials, or others.
Prepare a report summarizing the findings of our review, site reconnaissance, property owner interviews, historical photograph evaluation, and regulatory records review. We will address identified potential contamination and hazardous material impacts to provide recommendations and determine additional investigation and analysis.
Preliminary Materials Report
Crawford will complete a materials engineering evaluation, general following Caltrans guidelines. The PMR will include a project description; site description; existing pavement and other material conditions; summary of the previous geotechnical or materials studies/explorations, soils surveys, geologic maps used to develop the report; preliminary pavement section (utilizing the R-value tests from Task 2.3); preliminary corrosion considerations; and recommended field work and laboratory testing to be completed during future phases.
Crawford also included allowance for the Caltrans review process to respond to review comments if/as needed.
Following receipt of all Draft PMR review comments and concurrence with Caltrans, Crawford will prepare and submit a Final PMR incorporating the comments as necessary.
Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD)
During the refinement of the project alternatives Mark Thomas will identify features that do not meet current Caltrans Design Standards. Design exceptions will be required. Mark Thomas will prepare a draft Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD). The draft DSDD will be submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. The approved DSDD will be included as an attachment to the Draft Project Report because there is only one build alternative. A Design Information Bulletin 78 design checklist will be submitted with the GADs. The checklist documents conformance with applicable design standards. We anticipate one (1) review by Caltrans District 10 and a final review/ approval by Caltrans Headquarters Project Delivery Coordinator because both underlined and bold design exceptions are anticipated.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Recommended Alternatives
Mark Thomas will prepare the Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) using the current RealCost Version. We will follow the ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
flowchart Figure 2-2 for Lane Widening to select the design life and pavement type.
Value Analysis
Mark Thomas will request an exception to prepare a Value Analysis. Mark Thomas as the ability to participate in a VA Study as needed. If a VA Study is required the 3rd party facilitator is not included as part of this scope.
DELIVERABLES
Structures Advanced Planning Study (APS)
Preliminary Geotechnical Design Report
Bridge Preliminary Foundation Report
Initial Site Assessment
Preliminary Materials Report
Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD)
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Recommended Alternatives
Value Analysis, or Exception
Task 2.5. Traffic Studies (WBS 160.10)
Traffic Management Plan
Consistent with Caltrans standards, Mark Thomas will prepare a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) checklist and for inclusion in the Project Report. This will include a review of traffic control restrictions, recommendations for anticipated lane closures, construction staging/traffic requirements, COZEEP requirements, and a review of construction strategies.
The TMP will be submitted to Caltrans for approval and will be included as an attachment to the Project Report.
Traffic Analysis Methodology
Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Traffic Analysis Assumptions and Methodology Memorandum that lists the assumptions and methodology for the data collection process, travel demand forecasting, intersection and freeway operations and safety analysis, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impact analysis and mitigation. After review by the project team, we will respond to one set of comments and provide a final Traffic Analysis Assumptions and Methodology Memorandum. The final memo will serve to update and refine the initial traffic analysis tasks outlined below.
Traffic Data Collection
Fehr & Peers will collect weekday peak period (6 to 9 AM and 3 to 6 PM) intersection turning movement counts for the following study intersections.
SR 120/Main Street Interchange
1. Main Street/Industrial Park Drive/Misson Ridge Drive
2. Main Street/SR 120 Westbound Ramps
3. Main Street/SR 120 Eastbound Ramps
4. Main Street/Quintal Road
5. Main Street/Atherton Drive
6. Main Street/Wawona Street
Intersection counts will also be collected at the following freeway interchange ramp terminal intersections to obtain ramp volumes for use in the freeway operations analysis.
McKinley Avenue/SR 120 Westbound Ramps
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
McKinley Avenue/SR 120 Eastbound Ramps
Union Road/SR 120 Westbound Ramps
Union Road/SR 120 Eastbound Ramps
The turning movement counts will be collected on a midweek day (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) while schools are in session and during fair weather. The counts will include heavy vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Fehr & Peers will also conduct field reconnaissance to observe AM and PM peak-period traffic operations at the study intersections listed above.
Fehr & Peers will collect weekday peak period (6 to 9 AM and 3 to 6 PM) volumes from the Caltrans Performance Measurement System (PeMS) database for the following freeway mainline and ramp locations.
Eastbound SR 120 between Yosemite Avenue and McKinley Avenue Eastbound SR 120 to northbound SR 99
Eastbound SR 120 to southbound SR 99
Northbound SR 99 to westbound SR 120
Southbound SR 99 to westbound SR 120
Fehr & Peers will request collision data from the most recent five-year period from Caltrans for the freeway mainline and ramps in the project area. We will request traffic signal timing plans for the existing signalized intersections from the City of Manteca and Caltrans.
Existing Conditions Analysis
Fehr & Peers will analyze traffic operations according to guidance from the Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition (2022). Signalized and stop-controlled intersections will be analyzed using the Synchro/SimTraffic traffic simulation analysis software so that the interaction of adjacent signalized intersection can be measured. Simulation analysis also provides more accurate estimates of queue length since storage lengths and the effect of queue blockage is specifically modeled. Following Caltrans District 10 process, the following measures of effectiveness will be reported for each turning movement: served volume, intersection delay, level of service, and 95th percentile queue length. Additionally, the following network wide performance measures will be reported:
Demand volume
Served volume
Percent demand served
Total stops
Stops per vehicle
Vehicle hours of delay
Vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
Vehicle hours of travel
Average speed
Fuel used
Total emissions
The SimTraffic analysis will be based on an average of 12 runs with each run recording a one-hour analysis period. The analysis period will consist of four 15-minute intervals with the PHF adjustment applied for the second interval and the anti-PHF adjustment applied for the other three intervals.
The freeway study segments will be analyzed using the HCS traffic analysis software that applies the HCM procedures to analyze basic, merge, diverge, and weave segments. The analysis segments for existing conditions are listed below.
Eastbound SR 120
McKinley Avenue Off-ramp (Diverge)
McKinley Avenue Off to On-ramp (Basic)
McKinley Avenue On-ramp (Merge)
Airport Way Off-ramp (Diverge)
Airport Way Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Airport Way to Union Road (Weave)
Union Road Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Union Road to Main Street (Weave)
Westbound SR 120
SR 99 to Main Street (Basic)
Main Street Off-ramp (Diverge)
Main Street Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Main Street to Union Road (Weave)
Union Road Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Union Road to Airport Way (Weave)
Airport Way Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Airport Way On-ramp (Merge)
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Main Street Off to On-ramp (Basic)
Main Street On-ramp (Merge)
Main Street to SR 99 (Basic)
McKinley Avenue Off-ramp (Diverge)
McKinley Avenue Off to On-ramp (Basic)
McKinley Avenue On-ramp (Merge)
For each interchange, we will report the results for the subject interchange and the adjacent interchanges for the AM and PM peak hours. The HCM methodology is an isolated analysis, so the recurrent congested conditions in the eastbound direction that extends from the SR 99 interchange into the study area will not be reflected in the analysis results for upstream segments. We will note where the analysis results do not match observed congested conditions.
Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Existing Conditions Report for each interchange that will document the data collection, traffic forecasts and operations analysis methodology, and existing conditions analysis results. After review by the project team, we will respond to one set of comments and prepare a final Existing Conditions Report for each interchange.
Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Existing Conditions Report for each interchange that will document the data collection, traffic forecasts and operations analysis methodology, and existing conditions analysis results. After review by the project team, we will respond to one set of comments and prepare a final Existing Conditions Report for each interchange.
Traffic Forecasts
-county model (San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and
Merced) to prepare travel demand forecasts. Although the Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA) indicates that the three-city model (Lathrop, Manteca, and Ripon) would be used for the PA/ED phase, Caltrans District 10 staff have recently requested the three-county model for other interchange projects in the City of Lathrop. The three-city model tends to overestimate land use growth within its planning horizon, whereas the three-county model constrains land use growth, making it a more reasonable basis for sizing infrastructure improvements for a specified design year. We will review and update the roadway networks and land use inputs in the project vicinity for the base year model to match current conditions. The base year model will be validated to the collected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. The cumulative year model will be similarly reviewed in the project vicinity to ensure that planned roadway and land use changes are accounted for.
Using the existing traffic counts and the base and cumulative year forecast model volumes, Fehr & Peers will prepare opening year and design year traffic forecast volumes for the study intersections under the No Build and build alternatives during the AM and PM peak hours. Daily volume forecasts for SR 120, Airport Way, and Main Street will be prepared to support air quality analysis, noise analysis, and pavement design. The forecasting process will use the difference and ratio methods as appropriate according to guidance from NCHRP Report 765: Analytical Travel Forecasting Approaches for Project-Level Planning and Design (2014). The intersection forecasts will be prepared for the No Build Alternative and one build alternative for each interchange.
Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Travel Demand Model Validation and Forecasting Memorandum for each interchange that will document the base year model validation and the traffic forecasts for the study intersections and freeway segments. After review by the project team, we will respond to one set of comments and prepare a final Travel Demand Model Validation and Forecasting Memorandum for each interchange.
Future Conditions Analysis
Starting with the traffic operations models developed for existing conditions, Fehr & Peers will develop opening year and design year intersection operations analysis models in the Synchro/SimTraffic software. AM and PM peak hour ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
conditions will be analyzed for the No Build and one build alternative for each interchange. Similarly, opening year and design year freeway analysis models will be developed in the HCS software. AM and PM peak hour conditions will be analyzed for the No Build and one build alternative for each interchange.
Fehr & Peers will conduct a multimodal assessment for one build alternative at each interchange. The effect of the proposed alternatives on the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit system will be discussed. Fehr & Peers will determine the ramp meter storage requirements according to the Ramp Meter Design Manual guidance according to passenger vehicle and truck volumes.
current ISOAP evaluation is not expected to be required and is thus not included in this work plan.
Traffic Operations Analysis Report
Fehr & Peers will prepare a draft Traffic Operations Analysis Report for each interchange that documents the data collection, traffic forecasts, and traffic operations analysis. Fehr & Peers assumes that the traffic analysis findings will be integrated into the CEQA and/or NEPA documents by others. After review by the project team, Fehr & Peers will respond to one set of comments and prepare the final Traffic Operations Analysis Report. The draft and final reports will be submitted in Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF formats.
VMT Analysis and Mitigation
As part of the PID process, Fehr & Peers provided preliminary induced VMT forecasts for the VMT Decision Documents (VMTDDs). The method for the VMTDDs was the California Induced Travel Calculator, which is only capable of producing a positive forecast when a project is increasing Class 1, 2, or 3 lane miles. As a result, the method may not fully capture the unique context of interchange improvements and may overstate the induced VMT effect.
As a first item of work, Fehr & Peers will conduct an updated review of the previous VMTDD results and provide a summary of the strengths and limitations of the Calculator methodology as well as a description of the alternative methodology of using the SJCOG regional travel demand model. The results will be presented to the PDT to determine the preferred method. If the PDT determines that the elasticity method is the appropriate approach, Fehr & Peers will update the calculations based on the latest version of the Calculator. If the SJCOG model methodology is selected, it would trigger Optional Task below.
Safety Assessment
Fehr & Peers will use safety analysis methods from the Highway Safety Manual (AASHTO, 2010) to evaluate and support preferred alternatives are selected, the safety analysis will be conducted for specific design exceptions identified by the Modification Factor Clearinghouse, to document the potential difference in safety performance between the proposed design feature and the standard feature. In circumstances where CMFs are not available, a qualitative assessment will be provided. The result of this analysis will be a memorandum documenting the findings organized by non-standard design features.
Cost Planning
Fehr & Peers will prepare preliminary construction cost estimates for electrical transportation elements of the proposed SR 120/Airport Way and SR 120/Main Street interchanges. This includes estimates for traffic signal installations, modifications, and removals; highway and street lighting systems; ramp metering systems; fiber optic cable systems; CCTV camera systems; changeable message signs; traffic monitoring station systems; and weather stations.
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
DELIVERABLES
Traffic Management Plan Checklist
Existing Traffic Analysis Conditions Report
Traffic Forecasts/Modeling
Future Conditions Analysis
Travel Demand Model Validation and Forecasting Memorandum Traffic Operations Analysis Assumptions and Methodology Memorandum (TOAR) Updated Review of VMT Decision Documents (VMTDDs)
Forecast VMT Using Travel Demand Model (optional)
Safety Assessment
Safety Analysis to Support the Selection of Preferred Alternative Task 2.6. Hydraulic/Hydrology Studies (WBS 160.10)
Drainage Report
Mark Thomas will obtain all relevant drainage information, including storm drain facilities, ditches, pipe location and sizes, local rainfall intensities and flows. A hydrologic analysis will be completed to develop watershed boundaries for the areas draining to this project, flows based on Caltrans standards, and preliminary drainage concepts.
A drainage report will be developed based on Caltrans guidelines. The report will include, but not be limited to, detailed discussions of the following: existing conditions, off-site hydrology and hydraulics, onsite roadway drainage, existing and post project drainage patterns, storm water quality, and other topics of significance.
Storm Water Data Report
Mark Thomas will prepare a Storm Water Data Report in accordance with Caltrans procedures based on information collected in the Drainage Report.
DELIVERABLES
Storm Water Data Report
Hydraulics/Hydrology Drainage Report
Task 2.7. Right of Way Requirements (WBS 160.10)
Mapping and Exhibits
Mark Thomas will prepare Right of Way requirements exhibits as well as utility conflict maps to be used to develop the Right of Way Data Sheet.
Right of Way Data Sheet
Monument will coordinate with the design team to identify right-of-way acquisitions resulting from the proposed improvements. Additionally, Monument will provide information about existing conditions within the project limits including, land use, and any existing rights or encumbrances known to exist on the affected properties. The specific steps Monument will take to determine impacts and estimate costs are as follows:
Perform a GIS analysis to identify property and rights potentially affected by the proposed design Use publicly available data and other real estate resources to confirm the ownership, land use, zoning, lot size, and improvements for each affected property.
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Perform a desktop inspection of properties to confirm the probable acquisition type (fee, easement, temporary construction easement, etc.) including identifying existing uses or personal property to be relocated (if any).
Calculate the fee and/or easement area (including temporary construction easements) that will need to be acquired for each impacted property using design data and assessor boundary information.
Estimate the total capital cost of acquisition for all parcels including real estate costs, relocation assistance, severance damages, loss of goodwill, fixtures and equipment, demolition and clearance.
Estimate permit costs.
Estimate the total support cost for all parcels including appraisal fees, condemnation costs, title and escrow fees, environmental fees, and consultant fees as necessary.
Escalate costs to anticipated right-of-way acquisition date.
Prepare a draft Caltrans Right of Way Data Sheet using Caltrans Exhibit 17-EX-21 (Right of Way Data Sheet for Local Public Agencies) for the Build Alternatives.
Update the RWDS based on comments from the design team and the City and submit a final Draft RWDS.
Respond to comments from Caltrans R/W as necessary and make required updates to the Data Sheets.
DELIVERABLES
Right of Way Data Sheet
Utility Conflict Maps (30%)
Right of Way Needs Summary/Exhibit
Property Access Rights for Environmental/Engineering Studies Task 2.8. Draft Project Report (WBS 160.15)
Mark Thomas will prepare the Draft and Final Project Report (PR) for distribution, review and approval by the City, Caltrans, and selected PDT members.
As a first item of work, Mark Thomas will update the Risk Register to include items such as VMT or any other items that may need to be updated. This risk register will be reviewed by the PDT and will be updated again prior to the draft submittal of the Project Report.
Concurrent with environmental document submittals, we will prepare the Project Report (PR) for distribution, review and approval by Caltrans, and the rest of the PDT. The PR will be prepared in conformance with Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual latest guidelines and format style will include the supporting information (GADs, Traffic Studies, Cost Estimates, etc.) listed above.
Mark Thomas will prepare a design exhibit that highlights project geometric layout, lane configurations, signal locations, preliminary drainage, and potential utility conflicts.
The Draft PR requests approval to circulate environmental document, it will be submitted in Draft Form (full District circulation), Draft Final (limited, management review) and Final Form (District circulation copies), for a total of three submittals.
DELIVERABLES
Draft Project Report
Cost Estimates for Alternatives
Geometric Approval Drawings for Recommended Alternatives ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Risk Register
Design Exhibit
Task 2.9. Land Surveys (WBS 160.20)
Task 2.9.1. Land Net Surveys
Mark Thomas will complete a boundary survey to delineate the existing right of way for SR120 and Main Street. Mark Thomas will conduct record research at the County and with Caltrans to obtain record maps. Monuments identified on record maps along with other physical evidence will be located in the field to aid in the retracement for right of way and parcel lines impacted by the project. It is assumed that up to twelve (12) parcels along the right of way will be impacted and up to twelve (12) preliminary title reports will be ordered by Mark Thomas to review and plot all encumbrances and easements shown in the title reports. The boundary survey completed for this task will be known as Task 2.9.2. Control Surveys
Mark Thomas will base the project control on the California Coordinate System of 1983 (CCS83), Zone 3, Epoch 2017.50 and vertically upon the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Mark Thomas will set up to twelve (12) flight panels for aerial mapping. The control set for this task will be a part of the Caltrans B submittal for Aerotriangulation Adjustment Report and Ground point file. Horizontal values for project control and flight panels will be collected with GPS methods and elevations will be determined by a closed level loop.
Task 2.9.3. Aerial Surveys
Mark Thomas will coordinate with subconsultant Aerotech Mapping to complete aerial mapping along SR120 at Main Street. The flight will adhere to Caltrans ABC Photogrammetric Mapping standards and will undergo Caltrans review and approval.
Task 2.9.4. Supplemental Topo
Mark Thomas will collect supplemental topography of existing bridge vertical clearance and identified utilities. Field surveys and survey work products will be completed in conformance with the current edition (with updates) of the Caltrans Survey Manual. Mark Thomas will combine aerial photogrammetric mapping and supplemental field topography to develop a digital terrain model for the project. This scope of work is limited to three (3) days of field work.
Task 2.10. Environmental Study Request (WBS 160.30)
Mark Thomas will prepare mapping for the environmental study request. This mapping will include project impact maps as well as compiled survey data to be used in the technical studies. This also includes any access right to enter to conduct any environmental studies.
DELIVERABLES
Mapping for Environmental Study Report
Surveys and Mapping for Environmental Studies
Property Access Rights for Environmental/Engineering Studies ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
TASK 3. ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENTATION (WSB 165)
Task 3.1. Environmental Document Initiation/Project Description (WBS 165.25) The Mark Thomas team will draft a CEQA/NEPA project description with supporting figures. The project description will include the purpose and need statement, project construction and operational information, project background, and setting information. It is assumed there will be one of the project description from the City and one from the PDT, for a total of three submittals.
DELIVERABLES
Project Description
Area of Potential Effects Map (APE)
Task 3.2. Technical Studies (WBS 165.25)
To support the CEQA/NEPA clearance, we anticipate Caltrans will require the following technical studies. For the purposes of this scope and fee, we have assumed a limited number of hours to respond to Caltrans comments on technical reports. If Caltrans reviewers require multiple rounds of review, additional reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis.
Task 3.2.1. CIA
The Mark Thomas team will complete a Community Impact Assessment using the latest template available from the Caltrans SER. The draft CIA will include analysis of all relevant topics, including land use, parks and recreation, farmlands/timberlands, growth, population and housing, economics, environmental justice, and equity. The CIA will also include a summary of Section 4(f)/6(f) analysis.
Task 3.2.2. VIA
The Mark Thomas team will prepare the required VIA checklist/questionnaire for Caltrans review and concurrence. For the purposes of this scope, we assume the project will score between 19 and 28, requiring preparation of a VIA Memorandum. Accordingly, Mark Thomas will prepare the VIA for Caltrans review. The VIA Memorandum will follow all Caltrans requirements and will be in Caltrans format. A licensed landscape architect will oversee the preparation of the VIA questionnaire and VIA Memorandum. Up to two visual simulations are proposed.
Task 3.2.3. Section 4(f)
4(f)/6(f) memorandum that documents potential resources near the project and demonstrates no use.
Task 3.2.4. Other Technical Studies
Air Quality/GHG: LSA will prepare an Air Quality Report (AQR) that documents the study results consistent with Caltrans SER AQR Annotated Outline. Construction related air pollutant emissions will be quantified using California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) or another appropriate model as directed by Caltrans. Caltrans Standard Specifications for Construction, as well as mitigation measures, if necessary, will be recommended to reduce short-term, construction related impacts. Operational air pollutant emissions will also be quantified using CalEEMod, CT-EMFAC, or another ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
appropriate model as directed by Caltrans. The greenhouse gas (GHG) analysis would be based on the SER Climate Change Annotated Outline for a capacity increasing project and/or the most recent guidance available from Caltrans related to GHG emissions and climate change analysis requirements. This task will start after preparation of the traffic analysis.
LSA will prepare an Air Quality Conformity Analysis (AQCA) consistent with the most recent SER Air Quality Conformity Analysis Annotated Outline. LSA will prepare the associated AQCA Cover Letter and Air Quality Conformity Findings Checklist. LSA will prepare the PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis Project Summary Form for Interagency Consultation to allow the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) and the San Joaquin Valley Interagency Consultation Group (ICG) to determine whether a project requires a project-level PM hot-spot analysis pursuant to Federal Conformity Regulations, and to confirm that the project is not a Project of Air Quality Concern (POAQC). This scope assumes the preparation of a quantitative PM10 and PM2.5 Hot-Spot assessment would not be required. A qualitative Mobile Source Air Toxic (MSAT) analysis will be prepared according to FHWA Updated Interim Guidance on Mobile Source Air Toxic Analysis in NEPA Documents.
LSA will schedule and participate in an Interagency Consultation meeting, and will assist in the preparation of meeting analysis will be at the presentation to assist
with any traffic-related questions. To support the required 30-day public review period, LSA will prepare a draft public notice. Fees for the public notice will be the responsibility of Caltrans.
Biological Resources: LSA will conduct a records search of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) request from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) online system to identify sensitive or special-status biological resources that have been reported from the project vicinity and may have potential to occur within the biological study area.
An LSA biologist familiar with the habitats and biological resources of the region will conduct a general walkover field survey of the biological study area (i.e., project site plus 100-foot buffer oneach side of the alignment, where access is available or viewed with binoculars from the property boundary where not accessible) to assess and map habitat conditions and record general plant and wildlife observations. The project is located within an urban corridor in the City of Manteca. In a review of available aerial photographs, there is open space within the interchange and the interchange birds, and roosting bats.
LSA will prepare a Natural Environment Study-Minimal Impacts (NES-MI) to document the results of the literature review and field surveys. The NES-
(SER) template dated August 2022, or the most recent guidance available from Caltrans. The NES-MI will include a discussion of plant communities present in the biological study area, as well as a discussion of common plant and animal species occurring (or expected to occur) in the biological study area based on the plant communities present. A generalized vegetation map will be prepared showing plant community types as well as the locations of any sensitive biological resources incidentally observed during the survey. The NES-MI will include an assessment of project impacts on biological resources, and will recommend mitigation measures, where appropriate. Any special status species incidentally observed during the survey will be reported to the CNDDB. This scope of work does not include focused surveys for special-status species. If these surveys are needed, a budget augment will be requested Cultural Resources: LSA will conduct cultural resource technical studies to address requirements of Section 106 and CEQA. LSA assumes the project will require preparation of an Area of Potential Effects (APE), Archaeological Survey ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Report (ASR), a Historical Resources Evaluation report (HRER), and a Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) in order to project will occur concurrently with the field review for Project 2 (SR 120/Main Street).
On behalf of Caltrans, LSA will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento for a review of the Sacred Lands File to determine if the APE contains any listed sites. LSA will also request a list of geographically affiliated Native American tribes that may have information or concerns about the project. LSA will provide the contacted by letter and follow-up email to solicit input, and compilation of separate administrative records.
LSA assumes preparing Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 Series records for a minimum of five (5) built environmental cultural resources, as appropriate. This number may change pending the outcome of consultation with the Caltrans Architectural Historian. LSA will update the DPR 523 Series records for a minimum of ten (10) built environmental cultural resources, as appropriate, identified in the previous studies that are in the APE. The updates will include an evaluation for listing in the NHRP. The newly prepared and updated DPRs will be appended to the HRER.
If additional built environment resources are identified within or adjacent to the APE, Caltrans requires updating existing DPRs of other built environment resources in the APE, or Caltrans requires other related cultural resource technical studies to address built environment resources, LSA will develop a scope and budget to address the additional required study and prepare draft/final documentation per Caltrans and OHP guidelines.
Based on currently available information, LSA believes a Finding of Effect (FOE) document to address historic properties is not required. If required, a supplemental scope and budget would be necessary.
Energy:
construction and operation of the project, including diesel and gasoline fuel use for off road construction equipment, on road construction vehicles, and operational vehicle trips. LSA will prepare an Energy Memorandum summarizing this analysis.
Noise: LSA will prepare a Noise Study Report (NSR) consistent with the April 2020 Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013 Technical Noise Supplement (TeNS), and the annotated outline provided by the Caltrans SER.
The NSR will identify traffic noise impacts on land uses located adjacent to the proposed project. The areas with potential traffic noise impacts under the design year with project scenario will be identified using land use information, aerial photographs, and field reconnaissance. A discussion of any existing sensitive uses and approved future uses in the project vicinity will be included.
Ambient noise level measurements will be conducted to establish the existing noise environment at representative receptor locations adjacent to the interchange. Up to two long-term (24-hour) and up to 16 short-term (20-minute) noise level measurements will be made to document the existing noise environment and to calibrate the traffic noise model. Observations of other noise sources, barriers, terrains, building heights, and other site-specific information will be noted during each measurement period.
Noise impacts from construction sources will be analyzed based on the equipment expected to be used, length of a specific construction task, equipment power type (gasoline or diesel engine), horsepower, load factor, and percentage of time in use. The construction noise impact will be evaluated in terms of maximum levels (Lmax) and the frequency of occurrence at adjacent receptor locations. Analysis requirements will be based on the sensitivity of the project study area and the Noise Ordinance specifications of San Joaquin County and the City of Manteca, as well as Caltrans Standard Specifications in Section 14-8.02.
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
The FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM), Version 2.5, will be used to evaluate the traffic noise levels associated with the Existing, Future No Build, and one Build Alternative. The TNM 2.5 model will be calibrated using the short-term noise level measurements and concurrent traffic counts to ensure the accuracy of the noise model. The existing and designyear (future) traffic conditions will assume either the worst noise- hour traffic volumes or the peak-hour traffic volumes provided in the traffic study, whichever is less. The traffic mix for the noise model will be obtained from the traffic study or traffic counts during noise levels measurements. Traffic noise impacts will be determined based on the design year with project traffic noise levels and the corresponding NAC for each land use.
Noise abatement measures (noise barriers) designed to reduce long-term traffic noise impacts by 5 dBA or more, as required to be feasible, will be evaluated. A reasonable allowance per residence and total reasonable allowance per residence will be calculated for each noise barrier height. LSA will prepare a Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) consistent with the April 2020 Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol and the annotated outline provided by the Caltrans SER. The preliminary noise abatement decision, and secondary effects of abatement (impacts on cultural resources, scenic views, hazardous materials, and biology) will be provided.
Paleontology: LSA will prepare a combined Paleontological Identification Report/Paleontological Evaluation Report (PIR/PER) to address the potential for paleontological resources to occur within the anticipated disturbance limits, both horizontal and vertical, and be impacted by project activities. All tasks and documents will be consistent with the standards set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP), current industry best practices, and the guidelines in the Caltrans SER, Chapter 8: Paleontology. The paleontological survey will be conducted at the same time as the cultural resources survey by a paleontologist or an archaeologist who is cross-trained in identifying paleontological resources.
DELIVERABLES
Air Quality Report and an Air Quality Conformity Analysis Air Quality Conformity Cover Letter
Air Quality Conformity Findings Checklist
Noise Study Report (NSR)
Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR)
Community Impact Assessment (CIA) Memorandum
Natural Environment Study-Minimal Impacts (NES-MI)
Area of Potential Effects
Archeological Study Report (ASR)
Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER)
Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR)
Energy Memorandum
Combined Paleontological Identification report/Paleontological Evaluation Report (PIR/PER) Climate Change Study and Technical Energy Memorandum
Water Quality Memorandum
Visual Impact Assessment Memorandum
Department of Parks and Recreation Cultural Forms (Up to 5) Section 4(f)/6(f) Memorandum
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Task 3.3. Environmental Document (WBS 165.25)
Task 3.3.1. Draft Environmental Document
The Mark Thomas team will prepare the draft IS/EA. We will prepare the draft environmental document using the most recent annotated outlines from the Caltrans SER. We anticipate the following rounds of review prior to public circulation:
City review (1)
Caltrans generalist review (1)
Caltrans technical team review/NEPA compliance review (1) Caltrans Senior review (1)
Caltrans Office Chief (1)
After the above rounds of review are complete, Mark Thomas will prepare the public review draft IS/EA. This will include required 508 compliance editing of the documents, a necessary step to ensure the documents can be posted online.
Mark Thomas will support the City and Caltrans in preparing and planning for required notices. We anticipate that one newspaper add will be run one time, and that no mailers or similar printed notices will be required. We will provide web-ready versions of the notices and envir
Task 3.3.2. Public Review
Mark Thomas will review public comments and prepare response to comments.
DELIVERABLES
Draft CEQA IS/MND
Draft NEPA EA
Respond to Comments /Mitigation Monitoring Response Program (RTC/MMRP) TASK 4. OBTAIN PERMITS, LICENSES, AGREEMENTS AND
CERTIFICATIONS (PLACS) (WBS 170)
Task 4.1. Permits (WBS 170.10)
Mark Thomas will prepare and submit an encroachment permit to Caltrans. This will allow the project team to conduct field surveys in Caltrans right of way.
DELIVERABLES
Caltrans Encroachment Permit
Task 4.2. Freeway Agreement (WBS 170.20)
Mark Thomas will assist in initial discussions around the freeway agreement with Caltrans. As needed, Mark Thomas will assist the City with any updates to the freeway agreement that may be needed. Freeway agreements would be executed in PS&E Phase.
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
Task 4.3. Maintenance Agreement (WBS 170.30)
Mark Thomas will assist in initial discussions around the maintenance agreement with Caltrans. Mark Thomas will assist the City with the updated maintenance agreement. Maintenance agreements would be executed in PS&E Phase.
TASK 5. CIRCULATE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT AND
SELECT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE (WBS 175)
Task 5.1. Analyzation and selection of the most feasible alternative (WBS 175) Mark Thomas will prepare a memo analyzing the project alternatives for the City to review. Alternative analysis will include but not limited to costs, schedule, funding opportunities, mitigation strategy, interchange configuration, bridge widening direction, and bicycled and pedestrian improvements.
DELIVERABLES
Alternative Analysis Memo
TASK 6. PREPARE AND APPROVE PROJECT REPORT AND FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (WBS 180)
Task 6.1. Prepare Final Project Report (WBS 180.05)
Mark Thomas will prepare the Final Project Report (PR) for distribution, review and approval by the City, Caltrans, and selected PDT members.
Concurrent with environmental document submittals, we will prepare the Project Report (PR) for distribution, review and approval by Caltrans, and the rest of the PDT. The PR will be prepared in conformance with Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual latest guidelines and format style will include the supporting information (GADs, Traffic Studies, Cost Estimates, etc.) listed above.
The Final PR requests approval of project. The reports will be submitted in Draft Form (full District circulation), Draft Final (limited, management review) and Final Form (District circulation copies), for a total of three submittals.
DELIVERABLES
Final Project Report
Final GAD
Task 6.2. Final Environmental Document (WBS 180.15)
ATTACHMENT 3
Main Street Interchange - PA&ED
City of Manteca
The Mark Thomas team will prepare a response to comments for a limited number of public comments; if the amount or complexity of comments received exceeds what we have budgeted, an augment will be required. We will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
Final IS/EA: Mark Thomas will prepare a final IS/EA for City and Caltrans review. We anticipate the following:
City review (1)
Caltrans generalist and technical review (1)
Caltrans Senior review (1)
Caltrans Office Chief (1)
Mark Thomas will also prepare one draft and one final Environmental Commitments Record in a format/template to be provided by Caltrans.
DELIVERABLES
Final IS/MND
Final NEPA EA
Environmental Commitment Record
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
Principal
Matt Brogan
Sr. Project Manager
Martha Dadala
Project Manager
Kira Caselli
Sr. Project Engineer
Arsalan
Gharachorloo
Sr. Project Manager
Sr. Project Engineer
Sr. Technical
Engineer
Project Engineer
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
Intern
Survey Division
Manager
Survey Manager II
Project Surveyor II
Asst Surveyor II
Lead Survey
Technician
Survey Technician II
2-Person Crew (OE3)
3-Person Crew (OE3)
Sr. Project Manager -
PL
Project Manager - PL
Planner II
Sr. Project
Accountant
Sr. Project
Coordinator
AIM
Crawford
Fehr & Peers
LSA
Monument ROW
ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
Project No. Contract No. Date 11/3/2025
DIRECT LABOR
Range Hours
Actual or
Average
Hourly Rate
Total
$185 - $226 140.0 189.56 $ 26,538.40 $
$85 - $121 100.0 142.15 $ 14,215.00 $
$70 - $100 700.0 $ 79.90 $ 55,930.00
$60 - $89 682.0 $ 64.36 $ 43,893.52
$185 - $226 0.0 $ 196.00 $ -
$120 - $168 0.0 $ 138.00 $ -
$115 - $142 0.0 $ 123.00 $ -
$115 - $142 0.0 $ 123.00 $ -
$85 - $121 129.0 $ 102.00 $ 13,158.00
$85 - $105 0.0 $ 93.00 $ -
$70 - $100 0.0 $ 81.00 $ -
$70 - $100 0.0 $ 77.00 $ -
$60 - $89 222.0 $ 70.00 $ 15,540.00
$65 - $84 250.0 $ 68.00 $ 17,000.00
$50 - $68 520.0 $ 58.00 $ 30,160.00
$50 - $74 0.0 $ 62.00 $ -
$40 - $63 600.0 $ 47.00 $ 28,200.00
$35 - $47 460.0 $ 39.00 $ 17,940.00
$75 - $95 0.0 $ 80.00 $ -
$50 - $68 0.0 $ 59.00 $ -
$30 - $42 0.0 $ 38.00 $ -
$15 - $32 100.0 $ 23.00 $ 2,300.00
$95 - $116 0.0 $ 100.00 $ -
$85 - $110 0.0 $ 93.00 $ -
$65 - $84 0.0 $ 72.00 $ -
$55 - $74 0.0 $ 62.00 $ -
$45 - $63 0.0 $ 50.00 $ -
$35 - $53 0.0 $ 40.00 $ -
$25 - $37 0.0 $ 30.00 $ -
$20 - $32 0.0 $ 25.00 $ -
$100 - $147 6.0 $ 125.00 $ 750.00
$85 - $116 94.0 $ 91.00 $ 8,554.00
$75 - $100 0.0 $ 78.00 $ -
$70 - $89 0.0 $ 74.00 $ -
$60 - $84 196.0 $ 74.00 $ 14,504.00
$55 - $79 0.0 $ 61.00 $ -
$50 - $68 0.0 $ 57.00 $ -
$40 - $63 136.0 $ 47.00 $ 6,392.00
$40 - $58 0.0 $ 43.00 $ -
$45 - $89 0.0 $ 69.00 $ -
$40 - $74 0.0 $ 56.00 $ -
$40 - $58 0.0 $ 46.00 $ -
$45 - $58 16.0 $ 47.00 $ 752.00
$40 - $63 0.0 $ 48.00 $ -
$35 - $53 114.0 $ 41.00 $ 4,674.00
$20 - $37 0.0 $ 26.00 $ -
$85 - $110 0.0 $ 92.00 $ -
Name
Engineering Manager
Design Manager
Sr. Project Manager
Sr. Technical Lead
Project Manager
Technical Lead
Principal
Classification/Title
SR 120-Airport Interchange
Sr. Engineering Manager
Principal Matt Brogan
Sr. Project Manager Martha Dadala
Project Manager Kira Caselli
Sr. Project Engineer Arsalan Gharachorloo
CADD Manager
Sr. Technician
Technician
Intern
LAUD Division Manager
Sr. LAUD Project Manager
Sr. Project Engineer
Sr. Technical Engineer
Project Engineer
Civil Engineering Designer
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
Survey Division Manager
Survey Manager II
Survey Manager I
Project Surveyor III
Project Surveyor II
Project Surveyor I
LAUD Project Manager
Sr. Landscape Architect
Landscape Architect
Landscape Designer II
Landscape Designer I
Landscape Intern
Lead Survey Technician
Survey Technician III
Survey Technician II
Survey Technician I
SUE Program Manager
Asst Surveyor III
Asst Surveyor II
Asst Surveyor I
Survey Specialist III
Survey Specialist II
Survey Specialist I
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
ATTACHMENT 3
$60 - $79 0.0 $ 65.00 $
-
$75 - $100 0.0 $ 83.00 $ -
$60 - $79 0.0 $ 62.00 $ -
$50 - $68 0.0 $ 57.00 $ -
$50 - $68 0.0 $ 53.00 $ -
$30 - $47 0.0 $ 40.00 $ -
$125 - $158 160.0 $ 132.00 $ 21,120.00
$175 - $221 30.0 $ 188.00 $ 5,640.00
$65 - $84 0.0 $ 69.00 $ -
$55 - $74 0.0 $ 62.00 $ -
$55 - $74 0.0 $ 60.00 $ -
$35 - $53 0.0 $ 45.00 $ -
$130 - $163 0.0 $ 139.00 $ -
$185 - $231 0.0 $ 198.00 $ -
$75 - $95 0.0 $ 82.00 $ -
$145 - $179 0.0 $ 154.00 $ -
$105 - $131 0.0 $ 110.00 $ -
$90 - $116 0.0 $ 100.00 $ -
$110 - $137 0.0 $ 117.00 $ -
$90 - $121 0.0 $ 101.00 $ -
$60 - $79 0.0 $ 66.00 $ -
$65 - $105 0.0 $ 87.00 $ -
$55 - $74 0.0 $ 61.00 $ -
$45 - $74 0.0 $ 55.00 $ -
$90 - $126 0.0 $ 97.00 $ -
$80 - $116 371.0 $ 98.00 $ 36,358.00
$55 - $74 635.0 $ 60.00 $ 38,100.00
$50 - $68 0.0 $ 54.00 $ -
$40 - $53 890.0 $ 43.00 $ 38,270.00
$30 - $42 0.0 $ 32.00 $ -
$35 - $47 0.0 $ 41.00 $ -
$105 - $142 0.0 $ 117.00 $ -
$75 - $95 0.0 $ 80.00 $ -
$40 - $74 0.0 $ 58.00 $ - $70 - $100 0.0 $ 76.00 $ -
$65 - $89 0.0 $ 74.00 $ -
$50 - $74 40.0 $ 58.00 $ 2,320.00
$35 - $58 0.0 $ 47.00 $ -
$45 - $68 61.0 $ 52.00 $ 3,172.00
$35 - $53 0.0 $ 45.00 $ -
$40 - $53 0.0 $ 45.00 $ -
$30 - $42 0.0 $ 33.00 $ -
$35 - $58 0.0 $ 45.00 $ -
$35 - $47 0.0 $ 40.00 $ -
$60 - $74 0.0 $ 68.00 $ -
$45 - $63 0.0 $ 49.00 $ -
$35 - $47 0.0 $ 39.00 $ -
$35 - $47 0.0 $ 38.00 $ -
$125 - $158 0.0 $ 137.00 $ -
$110 - $142 0.0 $ 121.00 $ -
$85 - $110 0.0 $ 93.00 $ -
$75 - $95 0.0 $ 87.00 $ -
$70 - $89 0.0 $ 74.00 $ -
$60 - $89 0.0 $ 66.00 $ -
$55 - $79 0.0 $ 63.00 $ -
$50 - $74 0.0 $ 57.00 $ -
$45 - $63 0.0 $ 55.00 $ -
$35 - $53 0.0 $ 40.00 $ -
$30 - $42 0.0 $ 34.00 $ -
District Manager-Engineer
Utility Locator (North)
3-Person Crew (OE3)
Chief of Party (OE12)
Instrumentperson (OE12)
Chainperson (OE12)
Apprentice (OE12)
2-Person Crew (OE12)
Utility Locator (South)
Chief of Party (OE3)
Instrumentperson (OE3)
Chainperson (OE3)
Apprentice (OE3)
2-Person Crew (OE3)
Sr. Resident Engineer
Resident Engineer
Asst. Resident Engineer
Sr. Inspector - CM
Inspector - CM
Office Engineer
3-Person Crew (OE12)
Safety Manager
Division Manager - CM
Area Manager - CM
Construction Manager
Survey Coordinator
Economist
Funding Manager Sr. Funding Specialist
Funding Specialist
Project Accountant Manager
Project Delivery Manager
Division Manager - PL
Sr. Project Manager - PL
Project Manager - PL
Sr. Planner
Planner II
Planner I
Assistant Sanitary Engineer
Lead Inspector
Sr. Inspector
Inspector
Inspector - Apprentice
Sr. Project Accountant
Deputy District Manager
Operations Manager
Sr. Sanitary Project Engineer
Sanitary Project Engineer
Associate Sanitary Engineer
Project Accountant
Sr. Project Coordinator
Project Coordinator
Sr. Project Assistant
Project Assistant
Sr. Technical Writer
Technical Writer
Sr. Graphic Manager
Sr. Graphic Designer
Graphic Designer
ATTACHMENT 3
$315 - $383 0.0 $ 331.00 $ -
$315 - $383 0.0 $ 331.00 $ -
LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 445,480.92
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) $8,909.62 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] 454,390.54 $
INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 100.37%) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 456,071.78 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 45.76%) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 207,929.11 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00%) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] 664,000.89 $
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [[(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10.00 %] $ 111,839.14 l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary Quantity Unit Unit Cost
0 miles $0.70 - $
3280 miles $0.70 2,296.00 $
0 HR $14.00 - $
0 EA $0.05 - $
0 sheets $1.00 - $
0 sheets $0.35 - $
0 sheets $0.05 - $
0 LS $500.00 - $
0 EA $15.00 - $
2 EA $5,000.00 10,000.00 $
12 LS $1,000.00 12,000.00 $
0 LS $1,000.00 - $
0 LS $3,000.00 - $
0 Day $260.00 - $
0 0 $0.00 - $
0 HR $30.00 - $
1 LS $11,500.00 11,500.00 $
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 35,796.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: AIM $ 57,372.25
Subconsultant 2: Crawford $ 51,528.38
Subconsultant 3: Fehr & Peers $ 169,531.22
Subconsultant 4: LSA $ 240,424.81
Subconsultant 5: Monument ROW $ 10,903.24
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ 529,759.90
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] 565,555.90 $ TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] 1,795,786.48 $
NOTES:
Survey Equipment
Mileage - Survey
Reproductions - full size
Reproductions - half size
Structure/Quantity Calculations
Misc. Costs
Overnight Mail/Mail
Potholing
2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.
3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.
Per Diem
Civil Grid
Aerial Mapping
Misc. Surveys (Maps, PTR's, etc.)
Safety Plan
Traffic Control
1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals Description of Item
Mileage
Copies
CM Truck & Equipment
Strategic Consulting
Expert Witness
ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal
per Cost Proposal
Total Hours per
Cost Proposal Avg Hourly Rate 2 Year Contract Duration
$445,480.92 / 6652.0 = $66.97 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rates
2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation % Average Hourly Rate Escalation
Year 1 $66.97 + 5.00% = $70.32 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $70.32 + 10000.00% = $7,102.11 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $7,102.11 + 5.00% # $7,457.22 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $7,457.22 + 5.00% = $7,830.08 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate Year 5 $7,830.08 + 5.00% = $8,221.58 Year 6 Avg Hourly Rate Year 6 $8,221.58 + 5.00% = $8,632.66 Year 7 Avg Hourly Rate
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated %
Completed Each Year
Total hours per
Cost Proposal
Total Hours per
Year
Year 1 60% x 6652.0 = 3991.2 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 40% x 6652.0 = 2660.8 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0% x 6652.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0% x 6652.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0% x 6652.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Year 6 0% x 6652.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 6
Total 100% Total 6652.0
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate
(calculated above)
Estimated hours
(calculated above) Cost per Year
Year 1 $66.97 x 3991.2 = $267,288.55 Estimated Cost Year 1 Year 2 $70.32 x 2660.8 = $187,101.99 Estimated Cost Year 2 Year 3 $7,102.11 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 3
Year 4 $7,457.22 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 4
Year 5 $7,830.08 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 5
Year 6 $8,221.58 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 6
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation $454,390.54
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation $445,480.92
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase $8,909.62 Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:
4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.
2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Certification of Direct Costs:
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
Name: Matt Brogan Title*: Principal, Executive Vice President Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyy): 11/03/2025 Email: [email protected] Phone Number: 916-605-6761 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
Address: 701 University Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95825 *An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements.
Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted I di t C t R t ( )
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
Consultant: AIM Consulting
Project No. Contract No. Date 10/28/2025
Range Hours Actual
Hourly Rate Total
Senior Outreach Manager 39 68.06 $ 2,620.31 $
Graphic Design 38 75.00 $ 2,812.50 $
Outreach Manager 55-65 69 $ 59.75 $ 4,092.88
Senior Outreach Coordinator 97 $ 48.85 $ 4,714.03
Outreach Coordinator 35-45 100 $ 39.65 $ 3,945.18
LABOR COSTS
$ 18,184.89
$ 227.31
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 18,412.20
INDIRECT COSTS
26.89% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 4,951.04 $
80.55% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 14,831.02 $
57% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] 10,575.97 $
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 30,358.03
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: 10% 4,877.02 $ l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
tbd at rate $ 1,250.00
tbd at rate $ 475.00
tbd at rate $ 2,000.00
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 3,725.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 3,725.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 57,372.25
NOTES:
1. 2.
3. Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
K. DeMaio
D. Tran
Manteca - Airport Way Part 2
DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name
TBD
F. Molina
TBD
Description of Item
Printing and Workshop supplies
Mileages
Mailers and Postage
The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.
Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) d) Fringe Benefits (Rate:
f) Overhead & G&A (Rate:
h) General & Admin (Rate:
Subconsultant 1:
Subconsultant 2:
Subconsultant 3:
Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.
Subconsultant 4:
ATTACHMENT 3
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 10/28/2025
1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$ 18,184.89 = $ 53.41 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $ 53.41 + = $ 56.08 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $ 56.08 + = $ 58.88 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $ 58.88 + = $ 61.82 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $ 61.82 + = $ 64.92 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 75.00% * = 255.4 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 25.00% * = 85.1 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 340.5
Year 1 $ 53.41 *= $ 13,638.66 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $ 56.08 *= $ 4,773.53 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $ 58.88 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $ 61.82 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $ - *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 5
= $ 18,412.20
= $ 18,184.89
= $ 227.31 Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:
1. 2.
3. 4.
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
255
85 0
0 0
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(calculated above) (calculated above)
340.5
Total
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 5%
340.5
5%
5%
AIM Consulting
CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
340.5
Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
341
2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
5%
Manteca - Airport Way
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal
340.5
340.5
Cost per Year
Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.
An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology).
This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
ATTACHMENT 3
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Name: Katie DeMaio Title *: President
Signature: Date of Certification: 10/28/2025
Email: [email protected] Phone number: 916-442-1168 Address: 2600 Capitol Ave, Suite 440 Sacramento cA 95816 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
Certification of Direct Costs:
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
Consultant: Fehr & Peers
Project No. Contract No. Date 11/21/2025
Range Hours Actual Hourly
Rate Total
83.17-151.44 103 $ 92.55 $ 9,532.65
65.87-99.04 102 $ 87.98 $ 8,973.96
48.80-81.73 110 $ 79.33 $ 8,726.30
65 $ 61.54 $ 4,000.10
42.55-64.90 81 $ 46.63 $ 3,777.03
34.86-51.44 168 $ 43.51 $ 7,309.68
168 $ 38.46 $ 6,461.28
35.58-55.29 104 $ 37.50 $ 3,900.00
25.96-38.46 $ 28.85 $ -
38.46-72.12 $ 60.82 $ -
29.81-49.52 $ 34.62 $ -
23.00-36.00 $ 31.50 $ -
Senior Project Accountant 37.02-77.88 $ 43.27 $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
LABOR COSTS
$ 52,681.00
$ 1,317.03
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 53,998.03
INDIRECT COSTS
60.79% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 32,825.40 $ 118.33% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 63,895.86 $
) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ -
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 96,721.26
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: 10% 15,071.93 $ l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
6 count $ 600.00 $ 3,600.00
200 miles $ 0.70 $ 140.00
$ -
$ -
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 3,740.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Senior Engineering Technican
Technician
Intern
Principal
Senior Associate
Associate
Associate
Senior Engineer/Planner
Engineer/Planner
Engineer/Planner
Senior Project Coordinator
Project Coordinator
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) d) Fringe Benefits (Rate:
f) Overhead & G&A (Rate:
h) General & Admin (Rate:
Subconsultant 1:
Subconsultant 2:
Description of Item
Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Counts
Mileage for field observations
Manteca SR 120 Airport Way
Interchange PA ED
DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name
Ashley Weiss
Yoyo Zeng
Zoey Li
Raina Joby
Yihao Zhang
Tanya Silchuk
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Francisco Martin
David Stanek
ATTACHMENT 3
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 3,740.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 169,531.22
NOTES:
1. 2.
3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.
Subconsultant 3:
Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.
Subconsultant 4:
The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.
ATTACHMENT 3
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 11/21/2025
1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$ 52,681.00 = $ 58.47 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $ 58.47 + = $ 61.39 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $ 61.39 + = $ 64.46 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $ 64.46 + = $ 67.69 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $ 67.69 + = $ 71.07 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 50.00% * = 450.5 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 50.00% * = 450.5 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 901.0
Year 1 $ 58.47 *= $ 26,340.50 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $ 61.39 *= $ 27,657.53 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $ 64.46 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $ 67.69 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $ - *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 5
= $ 53,998.03
= $ 52,681.00
= $ 1,317.03 Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:
1. 2.
3. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.
An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology).
This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 5%
Manteca SR 120 Airport Way
Interchange PA ED
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal
901.0
901.0
Cost per Year
Fehr & Peers
CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
901.0
Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
901
2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
451
451
0 0
0 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(calculated above) (calculated above)
901.0
Total
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 5%
901.0
5%
5%
ATTACHMENT 3
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Name: Lysa Wollard Title *: Chief Financial Officer
Signature: Date of Certification: 11/21/2025
Email: [email protected] Phone number: 925-977-3200 Address: 100 Pringle Ave. Suite 600 Walnut Creek CA 94596 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
Certification of Direct Costs:
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
Traffic forecasts, traffic operations analysis, VMT analysis, safety assessment and cost estimates for traffic design ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
Consultant: LSA Associates, Inc.
Project No. Contract No. Date 11/3/2025
Range Hours Actual Hourly
Rate Total
Principal in-Charge 39 79.56 $ 3,102.84 $
Project Manager 116 79.33 $ 9,202.28 $
Principal $72.10 - $105.87 54 88.99 $ 4,805.46 $
Associate $43.38 - $89.25 147 66.32 $ 9,749.04 $
Senior Technical Specialist $40.62 - $78.95 118 59.79 $ 7,055.22 $ Technical Specialist $34.58 - $45.36 299 39.97 $ 11,951.03 $ Assistant Technical Specialist $26.25 - $39.83 55 33.04 $ 1,817.20 $ GIS/Graphics $36.05 - $64.90 73 50.48 $ 3,685.04 $
Project Assistant $33.39 - $39.52 18 36.46 $ 656.28 $
Admin/Document Management $31.20 - $52.40 236 41.80 $ 9,864.80 $
LABOR COSTS
$ 61,889.19
$ 4,267.26
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 66,156.45
INDIRECT COSTS
119.51% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 79,063.57 $ 101.45% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 67,115.72 $
0% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 146,179.29
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: 10% 21,233.57 $ l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
7 days 200.00 $ 1,400.00 $
23 each/cost 25.00 $ 575.00 $
1 each 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $
8 each 0.75 $ 6.00 $
1 days 200.00 $ 200.00 $
1735 each 0.70 $ 1,214.50 $
3 days 75.00 $ 225.00 $
6 days 75.00 $ 450.00 $
3 each 335.00 $ 1,005.00 $
3 each 200.00 $ 600.00 $
3 each 60.00 $ 180.00 $
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 6,855.50 $
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) none
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 6,855.50 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 240,424.81
NOTES:
1. 2.
3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) d) Fringe Benefits (Rate:
f) Overhead & G&A (Rate:
h) General & Admin (Rate:
Subconsultant 1:
Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.
Car Rental
Meals
Description of Item
Lodging
Records Search
Reproduction
Aerial Drone
Mileage
GPS Units
Sound Meter
Flight
Parking
The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.
DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Amanda Durgen
T.J. Warner
ATTACHMENT 3
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 11/3/2025
1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$ 61,889.19 = $ 53.58 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $ 53.58 + = $ 56.26 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $ 56.26 + = $ 59.08 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $ 59.08 + = $ 62.03 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $ 62.03 + = $ 65.13 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 2.00% * = 23.1 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 60.00% * = 693.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 38.00% * = 438.9 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 1155.0
Year 1 $ 53.58 *= $ 1,237.78 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $ 56.26 *= $ 38,990.19 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $ 59.08 *= $ 25,928.48 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $ 62.03 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $ - *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 5
= $ 66,156.45
= $ 61,889.19
= $ 4,267.26 Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:
1. 2.
3. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.
An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology).
This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 5%
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal
1155.0
1155.0
Cost per Year
LSA Associates, Inc.
CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
1155.0
Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
1155
2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
23 693
439
0 0
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(calculated above) (calculated above)
1155.0
Total
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 5%
1155.0
5%
5%
ATTACHMENT 3
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Name: Amy Fischer Title *: President/Chief Operating Officer Signature: Date of Certification: 11/21/2025
Email: [email protected] Phone number: (949) 553-0666 Address:
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
Certification of Direct Costs:
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
3210 El Camino Real, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602
Environmental Services for SR 120/Airport Way Interchange and SR 120/Main Street Interchange Projects in the City of Manteca, California ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
Principal
Matt Brogan
Sr. Project Manager
Martha Dadala
Project Manager
Kira Caselli
Sr. Project Engineer
Arsalan
Gharachorloo
Sr. Project Manager
Sr. Project Engineer
Sr. Technical
Engineer
Project Engineer
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
Intern
Survey Division
Manager
Survey Manager II
Project Surveyor II
Asst Surveyor II
Lead Survey
Technician
Survey Technician II
2-Person Crew (OE3)
3-Person Crew (OE3)
Sr. Project Manager -
PL
Project Manager - PL
Planner II
Sr. Project
Accountant
Sr. Project
Coordinator
AIM
Crawford
Fehr & Peers
LSA
Monument ROW
ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
Project No. Contract No. Date 11/3/2025
DIRECT LABOR
Range Hours
Actual or
Average
Hourly Rate
Total
$185 - $226 132.0 189.56 $ 25,021.92 $
$85 - $121 100.0 142.15 $ 14,215.00 $
$70 - $100 644.0 $ 79.90 $ 51,455.60
$60 - $89 682.0 $ 64.36 $ 43,893.52
0.0 $ - $ -
$185 - $226 0.0 $ 196.00 $ -
$120 - $168 0.0 $ 138.00 $ -
$115 - $142 0.0 $ 123.00 $ -
$115 - $142 0.0 $ 123.00 $ -
$85 - $121 129.0 $ 102.00 $ 13,158.00
$85 - $105 0.0 $ 93.00 $ -
$70 - $100 0.0 $ 81.00 $ -
$70 - $100 0.0 $ 77.00 $ -
$60 - $89 222.0 $ 70.00 $ 15,540.00
$65 - $84 250.0 $ 68.00 $ 17,000.00
$50 - $68 520.0 $ 58.00 $ 30,160.00
$50 - $74 0.0 $ 62.00 $ -
$40 - $63 620.0 $ 47.00 $ 29,140.00
$35 - $47 400.0 $ 39.00 $ 15,600.00
$75 - $95 0.0 $ 80.00 $ -
$50 - $68 0.0 $ 59.00 $ -
$30 - $42 0.0 $ 38.00 $ -
$15 - $32 100.0 $ 23.00 $ 2,300.00
$95 - $116 0.0 $ 100.00 $ -
$85 - $110 0.0 $ 93.00 $ -
$65 - $84 0.0 $ 72.00 $ -
$55 - $74 0.0 $ 62.00 $ -
$45 - $63 0.0 $ 50.00 $ -
$35 - $53 0.0 $ 40.00 $ -
$25 - $37 0.0 $ 30.00 $ -
$20 - $32 0.0 $ 25.00 $ -
$100 - $147 6.0 $ 125.00 $ 750.00
$85 - $116 94.0 $ 91.00 $ 8,554.00
$75 - $100 0.0 $ 78.00 $ -
$70 - $89 0.0 $ 74.00 $ -
$60 - $84 196.0 $ 74.00 $ 14,504.00
$55 - $79 0.0 $ 61.00 $ -
$50 - $68 0.0 $ 57.00 $ -
$40 - $63 136.0 $ 47.00 $ 6,392.00
$40 - $58 0.0 $ 43.00 $ -
$45 - $89 0.0 $ 69.00 $ -
$40 - $74 0.0 $ 56.00 $ -
$40 - $58 0.0 $ 46.00 $ -
$45 - $58 16.0 $ 47.00 $ 752.00
$40 - $63 0.0 $ 48.00 $ -
$35 - $53 114.0 $ 41.00 $ 4,674.00
$20 - $37 0.0 $ 26.00 $ -
Lead Survey Technician
Survey Technician III
Survey Technician II
Survey Technician I
Asst Surveyor III
Asst Surveyor II
Asst Surveyor I
Survey Specialist III
Survey Specialist II
Survey Specialist I
Survey Division Manager
Survey Manager II
Survey Manager I
Project Surveyor III
Project Surveyor II
Project Surveyor I
LAUD Project Manager
Sr. Landscape Architect
Landscape Architect
Landscape Designer II
Landscape Designer I
Landscape Intern
CADD Manager
Sr. Technician
Technician
Intern
LAUD Division Manager
Sr. LAUD Project Manager
Sr. Project Engineer
Sr. Technical Engineer
Project Engineer
Civil Engineering Designer
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
Engineering Manager
Design Manager
Sr. Project Manager
Sr. Technical Lead
Project Manager
Technical Lead
Principal
Classification/Title
SR 120-Main Interchange
Sr. Engineering Manager
Principal Matt Brogan
Sr. Project Manager Martha Dadala
Project Manager Kira Caselli
Sr. Project Engineer Arsalan Gharachorloo
0 Name
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
ATTACHMENT 3
$85 - $110 0.0 $ 92.00 $
-
$60 - $79 0.0 $ 65.00 $ -
$75 - $100 0.0 $ 83.00 $ -
$60 - $79 0.0 $ 62.00 $ -
$50 - $68 0.0 $ 57.00 $ -
$50 - $68 0.0 $ 53.00 $ -
$30 - $47 0.0 $ 40.00 $ -
$125 - $158 160.0 $ 132.00 $ 21,120.00
$175 - $221 30.0 $ 188.00 $ 5,640.00
$65 - $84 0.0 $ 69.00 $ -
$55 - $74 0.0 $ 62.00 $ -
$55 - $74 0.0 $ 60.00 $ -
$35 - $53 0.0 $ 45.00 $ -
$130 - $163 0.0 $ 139.00 $ -
$185 - $231 0.0 $ 198.00 $ -
$75 - $95 0.0 $ 82.00 $ -
$145 - $179 0.0 $ 154.00 $ -
$105 - $131 0.0 $ 110.00 $ -
$90 - $116 0.0 $ 100.00 $ -
$110 - $137 0.0 $ 117.00 $ -
$90 - $121 0.0 $ 101.00 $ -
$60 - $79 0.0 $ 66.00 $ -
$65 - $105 0.0 $ 87.00 $ -
$55 - $74 0.0 $ 61.00 $ -
$45 - $74 0.0 $ 55.00 $ -
$90 - $126 0.0 $ 97.00 $ -
$80 - $116 371.0 $ 98.00 $ 36,358.00
$55 - $74 635.0 $ 60.00 $ 38,100.00
$50 - $68 0.0 $ 54.00 $ -
$40 - $53 836.0 $ 43.00 $ 35,948.45
$30 - $42 0.0 $ 32.00 $ -
$35 - $47 0.0 $ 41.00 $ -
$105 - $142 0.0 $ 117.00 $ -
$75 - $95 0.0 $ 80.00 $ -
$40 - $74 0.0 $ 58.00 $ -
$70 - $100 0.0 $ 76.00 $ -
$65 - $89 0.0 $ 74.00 $ -
$50 - $74 40.0 $ 58.00 $ 2,320.00
$35 - $58 0.0 $ 47.00 $ -
$45 - $68 56 $ 52.00 $ 2,899.06
$35 - $53 0.0 $ 45.00 $ -
$40 - $53 0.0 $ 45.00 $ -
$30 - $42 0.0 $ 33.00 $ -
$35 - $58 0.0 $ 45.00 $ -
$35 - $47 0.0 $ 40.00 $ -
$60 - $74 0.0 $ 68.00 $ -
$45 - $63 0.0 $ 49.00 $ -
$35 - $47 0.0 $ 39.00 $ -
$35 - $47 0.0 $ 38.00 $ -
$125 - $158 0.0 $ 137.00 $ -
$110 - $142 0.0 $ 121.00 $ -
$85 - $110 0.0 $ 93.00 $ -
$75 - $95 0.0 $ 87.00 $ -
$70 - $89 0.0 $ 74.00 $ -
$60 - $89 0.0 $ 66.00 $ -
$55 - $79 0.0 $ 63.00 $ -
$50 - $74 0.0 $ 57.00 $ -
$45 - $63 0.0 $ 55.00 $ -
$35 - $53 0.0 $ 40.00 $ -
Assistant Sanitary Engineer
Lead Inspector
Sr. Inspector
Inspector
Sr. Project Accountant
Deputy District Manager
Operations Manager
Sr. Sanitary Project Engineer
Sanitary Project Engineer
Associate Sanitary Engineer
Project Accountant
Sr. Project Coordinator
Project Coordinator
Sr. Project Assistant
Project Assistant
Sr. Technical Writer
Technical Writer
Sr. Graphic Manager
Sr. Graphic Designer
Graphic Designer
Survey Coordinator
Economist
Funding Manager
Sr. Funding Specialist
Funding Specialist
Project Accountant Manager
Project Delivery Manager
Division Manager - PL
Sr. Project Manager - PL
Project Manager - PL
Sr. Planner
Planner II
Planner I
Sr. Resident Engineer
Resident Engineer
Asst. Resident Engineer
Sr. Inspector - CM
Inspector - CM
Office Engineer
3-Person Crew (OE12)
Safety Manager
Division Manager - CM
Area Manager - CM
Construction Manager
3-Person Crew (OE3)
Chief of Party (OE12)
Instrumentperson (OE12)
Chainperson (OE12)
Apprentice (OE12)
2-Person Crew (OE12)
Utility Locator (South)
Chief of Party (OE3)
Instrumentperson (OE3)
Chainperson (OE3)
Apprentice (OE3)
2-Person Crew (OE3)
SUE Program Manager
Utility Locator (North)
District Manager-Engineer
ATTACHMENT 3
$30 - $42 0.0 $ 34.00 $ -
$315 - $383 0.0 $ 331.00 $ -
$315 - $383 0.0 $ 331.00 $ -
LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 435,495.54
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) $ 8,709.91 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] 444,205.46 $
INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 100.37%) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 445,849.02 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 45.76%) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 203,268.42 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00%) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] 649,117.43 $
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [[(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10.00 %] $ 109,332.29 l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary Quantity Unit Unit Cost
0 miles $0.70 - $
3280 miles $0.70 2,296.00 $
0 HR $14.00 - $
0 EA $0.05 - $
0 sheets $1.00 - $
0 sheets $0.35 - $
0 sheets $0.05 - $
0 LS $500.00 - $
0 EA $15.00 - $
0 EA $5,000.00 - $
12 LS $1,000.00 12,000.00 $
0 LS $1,000.00 - $
2 LS $3,000.00 6,000.00 $
0 Day $260.00 - $
0 0 $0.00 - $
0 HR $30.00 - $
1 LS $11,500.00 11,500.00 $
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 31,796.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: AIM $ 57,372.25
Subconsultant 2: Crawford $ 51,528.38
Subconsultant 3: Fehr & Peers $ 185,501.18
Subconsultant 4: LSA $ 264,404.12
Subconsultant 5: Monument ROW $ 10,903.24
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ 569,709.17
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] 601,505.17 $ TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] 1,804,160.35 $
NOTES:
CM Truck & Equipment
Strategic Consulting
Inspector - Apprentice
Expert Witness
Description of Item
Mileage
Copies
2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.
3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.
Per Diem
Civil Grid
Aerial Mapping
Misc. Surveys (Maps, PTR's, etc.)
Safety Plan
Traffic Control
1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals Reproductions - full size
Reproductions - half size
Structure/Quantity Calculations
Misc. Costs
Overnight Mail/Mail
Potholing
Survey Equipment
Mileage - Survey
ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal
per Cost Proposal
Total Hours per
Cost Proposal Avg Hourly Rate 2 Year Contract Duration
$435,495.54 / 6489 = $67.12 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rates
2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation % Average Hourly Rate Escalation
Year 1 $67.12 + 5.00% = $70.47 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $70.47 + 5.00% = $73.99 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $73.99 + 5.00% = $77.69 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $77.69 + 5.00% = $81.58 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 5 $81.58 + 5.00% = $85.66 Year 6 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 6 $85.66 + 5.00% = $89.94 Year 7 Avg Hourly Rate
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated %
Completed Each Year
Total hours per
Cost Proposal
Total Hours per
Year
Year 1 60% x 6488.8 = 3893.3 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 40% x 6488.8 = 2595.5 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0% x 6488.8 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0% x 6488.8 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0% x 6488.8 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Year 6 0% x 6488.8 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 6
Total 100% Total 6488.8
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate
(calculated above)
Estimated hours
(calculated above) Cost per Year
Year 1 $67.12 x 3893.3 = $261,297.33 Estimated Cost Year 1 Year 2 $70.47 x 2595.5 = $182,908.13 Estimated Cost Year 2 Year 3 $73.99 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 3
Year 4 $77.69 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 4
Year 5 $81.58 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 5
Year 6 $85.66 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 6
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation $444,205.46
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation $435,495.54
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase $8,709.91 Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:
4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.
2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Certification of Direct Costs:
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
Name: Matt Brogan Title*: Principal, Executive Vice President Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyy): 11/03/2025 Email: [email protected] Phone Number: 916-605-6761 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
Address: 701 University Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95825 *An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements.
Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted I di t C t R t ( )
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
Consultant: AIM Consulting
Project No. Contract No. Date 10/28/2025
Range Hours Actual
Hourly Rate Total
Senior Outreach Manager 39 68.06 $ 2,620.31 $
Graphic Design 38 75.00 $ 2,812.50 $
Outreach Manager 55-65 69 $ 59.75 $ 4,092.88
Senior Outreach Coordinator 97 $ 48.85 $ 4,714.03
Outreach Coordinator 35-45 100 $ 39.65 $ 3,945.18
LABOR COSTS
$ 18,184.89
$ 227.31
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 18,412.20
INDIRECT COSTS
26.89% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 4,951.04 $
80.55% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 14,831.02 $
57% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] 10,575.97 $
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 30,358.03
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: 10% 4,877.02 $ l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
tbd at rate 1,250.00 $
tbd at rate 475.00 $
tbd at rate 2,000.00 $
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 3,725.00 $
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS - $
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 3,725.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 57,372.25
NOTES:
1. 2.
3. Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
K. DeMaio
D. Tran
Manteca - Airport Way Part 1
DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name
TBD
F. Molina
TBD
Description of Item
Printing and Workshop supplies
Mileages
Mailers and Postage
The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.
Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) d) Fringe Benefits (Rate:
f) Overhead & G&A (Rate:
h) General & Admin (Rate:
Subconsultant 1:
Subconsultant 2:
Subconsultant 3:
Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.
Subconsultant 4:
ATTACHMENT 3
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 10/28/2025
1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$ 18,184.89 = $ 53.41 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $ 53.41 + = $ 56.08 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $ 56.08 + = $ 58.88 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $ 58.88 + = $ 61.82 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $ 61.82 + = $ 64.92 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 75.00% * = 255.4 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 25.00% * = 85.1 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 340.5
Year 1 $ 53.41 *= $ 13,638.66 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $ 56.08 *= $ 4,773.53 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $ 58.88 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $ 61.82 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $ - *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 5
= $ 18,412.20
= $ 18,184.89
= $ 227.31 Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:
1. 2.
3. 4.
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
255
85 0
0 0
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(calculated above) (calculated above)
340.5
Total
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 5%
340.5
5%
5%
AIM Consulting
CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
340.5
Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
341
2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
5%
Manteca - Airport Way
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal
340.5
340.5
Cost per Year
Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.
An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology).
This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
ATTACHMENT 3
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Name: Katie DeMaio Title *: President
Signature: Date of Certification: 10/28/2025
Email: [email protected] Phone number: 916-442-1168 Address: 2600 Capitol Ave, Suite 440 Sacramento cA 95816 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
Certification of Direct Costs:
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
Consultant: LSA Associates, Inc.
Project No. Contract No. Date 11/21/2025
Range Hours Actual Hourly
Rate Total
Principal in-Charge 39 79.56 $ 3,102.84 $
Project Manager 118 79.33 $ 9,360.94 $
Principal $72.10 - $105.87 54 88.99 $ 4,805.46 $
Associate $43.38 - $89.25 235 66.32 $ 15,585.20 $
Senior Technical Specialist $40.62 - $78.95 124 59.79 $ 7,413.96 $ Technical Specialist $34.58 - $45.36 299 39.97 $ 11,951.03 $ Assistant Technical Specialist $26.25 - $39.83 55 $ 33.04 $ 1,817.20 GIS/Graphics $36.05 - $64.90 75 $ 50.48 $ 3,786.00
Project Assistant $33.39 - $39.52 18 $ 36.46 $ 656.28
Admin/Document Management $31.20 - $52.40 236 $ 41.80 $ 9,864.80
LABOR COSTS
$ 68,343.71
$ 4,712.30
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 73,056.01
INDIRECT COSTS
119.51% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 87,309.24 $ 101.45% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 74,115.32 $
0% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ -
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 161,424.56
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: 10% 23,448.06 $ l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
7 days 200.00 $ 1,400.00 $
23 each/cost 25.00 $ 575.00 $
1 each 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $
8 each 0.75 $ 6.00 $
1 days 200.00 $ 200.00 $
1835 each 0.70 $ 1,284.50 $
3 days 75.00 $ 225.00 $
3 each 335.00 $ 1,005.00 $
3 each 200.00 $ 600.00 $
3 each 60.00 $ 180.00 $
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 6,475.50 $
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) none
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS - $
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 6,475.50 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 264,404.12
NOTES:
1. 2.
3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) d) Fringe Benefits (Rate:
f) Overhead & G&A (Rate:
h) General & Admin (Rate:
Subconsultant 1:
Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.
Car Rental
Meals
Description of Item
Lodging
Records Search
Reproduction
Aerial Drone
Mileage
GPS Units
Flight
Parking
The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.
DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Amanda Durgen
T.J. Warner
ATTACHMENT 3
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 11/21/2025
1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$ 68,343.71 = $ 54.54 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $ 54.54 + = $ 57.27 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $ 57.27 + = $ 60.13 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $ 60.13 + = $ 63.14 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $ 63.14 + = $ 66.30 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 2.00% * = 25.1 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 60.00% * = 751.8 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 38.00% * = 476.1 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 1253.0
Year 1 $ 54.54 *= $ 1,366.87 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $ 57.27 *= $ 43,056.54 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $ 60.13 *= $ 28,632.60 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $ 63.14 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $ - *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 5
= $ 73,056.01
= $ 68,343.71
= $ 4,712.30 Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:
1. 2.
3. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.
This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.
An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology).
This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 5%
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal
1253.0
1253.0
Cost per Year
LSA Associates, Inc.
CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
1253.0
Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
1253
2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
25 752
476
0 0
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(calculated above) (calculated above)
1253.0
Total
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 5%
1253.0
5%
5%
ATTACHMENT 3
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:
1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
2. Terms and conditions of the contract
3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts
4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures
5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.
Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).
Name: Amy Fischer Title *: President/Chief Operating Officer Signature: Date of Certification: 11/21/2025
Email: [email protected] Phone number: (949) 553-0666 Address:
List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
Certification of Direct Costs:
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
3210 El Camino Real, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92602
Environmental Services for SR 120/Airport Way Interchange and SR 120/Main Street Interchange Projects in the City of Manteca, California Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3