Attachment 8 – Agreement for Services with Kleinfelder Incorporated

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”) is made and entered into this _______ day of__________, ___________, by and between the CITY OF MANTECA, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), and

KLEINFELDER, INCORPORATED
Consultant
2001 ARCH AIRPORT ROAD STOCKTON CA 95206

MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
a California corporation.

N/A
STATE LICENSE CLASSIFICATION & NUMBER (if required) hereinafter referred to as “CONSULTANT.”
WITNESSETH:

A. WHEREAS, CITY desires to enter into this Agreement for services for On-Call Materials Testing Services.

B. WHEREAS, CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to provide these services by reason of its qualifications, applicable license(s), and experience for performing such services, and CONSULTANT has offered to provide the required services on the terms and in the manner set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants, the parties hereto agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES:

A. Consultant shall do all work, attend all meetings, produce all reports and carry out all activities necessary to complete the services described in Exhibit “A.” This AGREEMENT and its exhibits shall be known as the “Agreement Documents.” Terms set forth in any Agreement Document shall be deemed to be incorporated in all Agreement Documents as if set forth in full herein. In the event of conflict between terms contained in these Agreement Documents, the more specific term shall govern. If any portion of the Agreement Documents is in conflict with any other portion or provisions contained in the AGREEMENT, the AGREEMENT shall govern over the conflicting provisions contained in the exhibits to the AGREEMENT. To eliminate doubt, in the case of conflict between Consultant's proposal or Consultant's attachments and the City's AGREEMENT and attachments, the City's AGREEMENT and attachments shall take precedence over Consultant's proposal and attachments.

ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
2 B. Consultant enters into this AGREEMENT as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. The Consultant shall have no power or authority by this AGREEMENT to bind the City in any respect. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Consultant and not of the City. The City shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wage claims or other claims made against Consultant by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or any other person resulting from performance of this AGREEMENT.

C. The Consultant agrees it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this AGREEMENT is based on such independent investigation and research.

2. TERM OF AGREEMENT
A. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement and shall be completed and this AGREEMENT terminated on _______ day of__________, 2029 unless otherwise extended in writing by the mutual agreement of both parties.

B. The City Manager or designee may, by written instrument signed by the Parties, extend the duration of this AGREEMENT in the manner provided in Section 5, provided that the extension does not require the payment of compensation in excess of the maximum compensation set forth in Section 3, Compensation.

3. COMPENSATION:

A. The Consultant shall be paid in accordance to the attached Fee and Deliverables Schedule in Exhibit “C.” Consultant charges separately for certain costs incurred in the representation, as well as for any disbursements to third parties made on City's behalf. Such costs and disbursements include, for example, the following: mileage (at the IRS rate in effect at the time the travel occurs), overnight delivery and messenger services. Consultant shall be reimbursed for expenses related to travel, for example (flights, hotels, meals). However, Consultant shall not make travel arrangements or incur costs on behalf of City without prior written authorization to incur said expenses and in no event shall total compensation under this AGREEMENT exceed ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000) annually or exceed THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($300,000) over the duration of the AGREEMENT without City’s prior written approval.

B. Said amount shall be paid within 30 days after satisfactory PROJECT progress and approval of the monthly billings by the CITY. Consultant shall furnish City with invoices for all expenses as well as for all materials authorized by this AGREEMENT. The invoices shall be submitted with the monthly billings.

C. If the work is suspended at the direction of the City, compensation shall be based upon the portion of work completed as of the date of the suspension, subject to Section 4C.

ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
3 4. TERMINATION:

A. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either party, provided that the other party is given not less than ten (10) calendar days’ written notice of intent to terminate.

B. The City may suspend this AGREEMENT, at no additional cost to City, provided that the Consultant is given written notice of suspension. If City gives such notice of suspension, Consultant shall immediately cease all billable activities under the Agreement, preserve and maintain all project records pending turnover, and contact the City within five calendar days to coordinate the orderly transfer of all project files under this AGREEMENT.

C. Notwithstanding any provisions of this AGREEMENT, Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this AGREEMENT by Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments due to Consultant until such time as the exact amount of damages, if any, due the City from Consultant is determined.

D. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be compensated as provided for in this AGREEMENT, except as provided in Section 4C. Upon termination, the City shall be entitled to all final work and draft work, including but not limited to, appraisals, inventories, studies, analyses, drawings and data estimates performed to that date in accordance with Section 7 herein.

5. AMENDMENTS, CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS:

Amendments, changes or modifications in the terms of this AGREEMENT may be made at any time by mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and shall be signed by the persons authorized to bind the parties hereto.

6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME:

Consultant may, for good cause, request extensions of time to perform the services required herein. Such extensions shall be authorized in advance by the City in writing and shall be incorporated in written amendments to this AGREEMENT in the manner provided in Section 5.

7. PROPERTY OF CITY:

A. It is mutually agreed that all draft and final materials prepared by the Consultant under this AGREEMENT shall become the property of the City, and the Consultant shall have no property right therein whatsoever. Immediately upon termination, the City shall be entitled to, and the Consultant shall deliver to the City, all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and other such materials as may have been prepared or accumulated to date by the Consultant in performing this AGREEMENT which is not Consultant’s privileged information, as defined by law, or Consultant’s personnel information, along with all other property belonging exclusively to the City which is in the Consultant’s possession.

B. Additionally, it is agreed that the parties intend this to be an AGREEMENT for services and each considers the products and results of the services to be rendered by Consultant herein (the “Work”) to be a work made for hire. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the Work (and all rights therein, including, without limitation, copyright) belongs to and shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City.

ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
4 8. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS:

A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, State and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this AGREEMENT. It shall be City’s responsibility to obtain all rights of way and easements to enable Consultant to perform its services herein.

Consultant shall assist City in providing the same.

B. Consultant warrants to the City that it is licensed by all applicable governmental bodies to perform this AGREEMENT and will remain so licensed throughout the progress of the Work, and that it has, and will have, throughout the progress of the Work, the necessary experience, skill and financial resources to enable it to perform this AGREEMENT.

9. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONSULTANT:

A. Consultant agrees and represents that it is qualified to properly provide the services set forth in Exhibit “A” in a manner which is consistent with the generally accepted standards of Consultant’s profession.

B. Consultant agrees and represents that the work performed under this AGREEMENT shall be in accordance with applicable federal, State and local law in accordance with Section 17A hereof.

C. Consultant shall designate a project manager who at all times shall represent the Consultant before the City on all matters relating to this AGREEMENT. The project manager shall continue in such capacity unless and until he or she is removed at the request of the City, is no longer employed by Consultant, or is replaced with the written approval of the City.

D. Consultant shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for services which fail to meet the above professional and legal standards and which are reported to Consultant in writing within sixty (60) days of discovery. Should Consultant fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations, the City may render or undertake performance thereof and the Consultant shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.

10. SUBCONTRACTING:

None of the services covered by this AGREEMENT shall be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Consultant shall be fully responsible to the City for the negligent acts and omissions of its contractors and subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as it is for the negligent acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant.

11. ASSIGNABILITY:

Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this AGREEMENT whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the City. However, claims for money due or to become due to Consultant from the City under this AGREEMENT may be assigned to a financial institution, or to a trustee in bankruptcy, without such approval. Notice of any assignment or transfer whether voluntary or involuntary shall be furnished promptly to the City.

ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
5 12. INTEREST IN AGREEMENT:

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the subject of the AGREEMENT, nor any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant shall make all disclosures required by the City’s conflict of interest code in accordance with the category designated by the City, unless the City Manager determines in writing that Consultant’s duties are more limited in scope than is warranted by the category designated by the City code and that a narrower disclosure category should apply.

Consultant also agrees to make disclosure in compliance with the City conflict of interest code if, at any time after the execution of this AGREEMENT, City determines and notifies Consultant in writing that Consultant’s duties under this AGREEMENT warrant greater disclosure by Consultant than was originally contemplated. Consultant shall make disclosures in the time, place and manner set forth in the conflict of interest code and as directed by the City.

13. MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL:

All of the materials prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to performance of this AGREEMENT are confidential and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City, except by court order.

14. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT-NEGLIGENCE:

Consultant shall be responsible for performing the work under this AGREEMENT in a manner which is consistent with the generally-accepted standards of the Consultant’s profession and shall be liable for its own negligence and the negligent acts of its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors. The City shall have no right of control over the manner in which the work is to be done but only as to its outcome, and shall not be charged with the responsibility of preventing risk to Consultant or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors.

15. INDEMNITY AND LITIGATION COSTS:

To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, and employees against all claims, damages, demands, liability, costs, losses and expenses, including without limitation court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising from Consultant's negligent acts or negligent failure to act, errors, omissions or willful misconduct incident to the performance of this AGREEMENT except such loss or damage caused solely by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive termination or suspension of this AGREEMENT.

16. CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE:

A. Consultant shall not commence any work before obtaining, and shall maintain in full force at all times during the duration and performance of this AGREEMENT, the policies of insurance specified in this Section. Such insurance must have the approval of the City as to limit, form, and amount, and shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than “A” in Class VII.

B. Prior to execution of this AGREEMENT and prior to commencement of any work, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and copies of endorsements ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
6 providing evidence of coverage for all policies required by the AGREEMENT. The Consultant shall, at their expense, maintain in effect at all times during the performance of work under the AGREEMENT not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Consultant of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this AGREEMENT. The failure of Consultant to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this AGREEMENT. Approval of the insurance by the City shall not relieve or decrease any liability of Consultant.

1. Commercial General Liability Insurance.
a. Commercial General Liability Insurance with $2,000,000 minimum limit for each occurrence and $4,000,000 minimum limit for general aggregate. b. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
c. Commercial General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement naming the following as insured on 2001 or earlier issued endorsement forms: “City of Manteca, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers”.

2. Automobile Liability: If the vehicles are brought onto city facilities, covering any auto, or of Contractor has no owned autos, hired, and non-owned autos, the Contractor shall maintain automobile liability with limits no less than:
a. Automobile Liability Insurance with $1,000,000 minimum limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
b. Automobile Liability Additional Insured Endorsement naming the following as additional insured: “City of Manteca, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers”.

3. Workers’ Compensation: As required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriates to the Contractor’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.

5. Other Insurance Provisions: The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
a. The City of Manteca, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as insured’s as respect to: liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance at least as broad as CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 if completed operations coverage is required.

ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
7 b. For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
c. The applicant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
d. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City of Manteca.

6. Verification of Coverage: Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the Entity before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them.

The City of Manteca reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

7. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the Entity.

8. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Manteca.

9. Waiver of Subrogation: Consultant hereby grants to The City of Manteca a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the Entity by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the Entity has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

10. Subcontractors: Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that The City of Manteca is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.

11. SPECIAL RISKS OR CIRCUMSTANCES: The City of Manteca reserves the right to modify these requirements based on the nature of the risk, prior events, insurance coverage, or other special circumstances.

12. Consultant shall sign the Certificate of Compliance with labor Code 3700 (Exhibit B).

13. No other provision of this Agreement or any attachment thereto shall reduce the insurance or indemnity obligations imposed under this Section.

ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
8 C. In addition to any other remedy the City may have, if Consultant fails to maintain the insurance coverage as required in this Section, the City may obtain such insurance coverage that is not being maintained, in the form and amount substantially the same as is required herein, and the City may deduct the cost of such insurance from any amounts due or which may become due to Consultant under this AGREEMENT.

D. No policy required by this AGREEMENT shall be suspended, cancelled, terminated by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits unless written approval is obtained by Consultant from the City.

E. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be declared to, and approved by, the City.

F. The requirement as to types, limits, and the City’s approval of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant are not intended to, and shall not in any manner, limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations assumed by Consultant under the AGREEMENT.

17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:

A. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of, shall observe and comply with, and shall cause any and all persons, firms or corporations employed by it or under its control to observe and comply with, applicable federal, state, county and municipal laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on the work described by this AGREEMENT or the materials used or which in any way affect the conduct of the work.

B. Unlawful Acts. Consultant shall not engage in unlawful employment discrimination.

Such unlawful employment discrimination includes, but is not limited to, employment discrimination based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, citizenship, or sexual orientation.

C. Record Retention. Consultant shall maintain and make available for inspection by the City and its auditors accurate records of all of its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to any work under this AGREEMENT. Such inspections may be made during regular office hours at any time until eighteen (18) months after the final payments under this AGREEMENT are made to the Consultant.

D. Notice. All notices that are required to be given by one party to the other under this AGREEMENT shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered electronically, personally, or enclosed in a properly addressed envelope and deposited in a United States Post Office for delivery by mail addressed to the parties at the following addresses:

City: Consultant:

Carrie Whitney
Management Analyst
City of Manteca
1001 W. Center St.

Manteca, CA 95337
Johan Jacobsen, PE
Program Manager
Kleinfelder, Incorporated
2001 Arch Airport Road
Stockton, CA, 95206
916-897-0001
[email protected]
ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
9 E. Governing Law and Venue. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of California, and any legal action relating to this AGREEMENT shall take place in the Superior Court, County of San Joaquin.

F. Waiver. Waiver of any breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach or default of the same or any other provision under this AGREEMENT.

G. Severability. If any provision of this AGREEMENT is held to be invalid, illegal or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this AGREEMENT shall continue in full force and effect.

H. Mediation. In the event of any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the Services provided by Consultant (each referred to as a “Dispute” and all collectively referred to as the “Disputes”), the Parties shall try to resolve all Disputes through good faith, direct discussions involving the representatives of each Party who possess the necessary authority to resolve such Dispute. If direct discussions are unsuccessful in resolving a Dispute, the Parties shall endeavor to resolve the matter by mediation through and administered by Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. J•A•M•S or its successor in interest. J•A•M•S shall provide the parties with the name of five (5) qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by J•A•M•S, and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation.

I. Costs and Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action may recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees.

J. Entire Agreement. This AGREEMENT constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the services specified herein and no modification hereof shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to this AGREEMENT. There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties or promises, with respect to this AGREEMENT, except those contained in or referred to in writing.

K. Execution. This AGREEMENT may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy has been signed by both parties.

L. Authority to Enter Agreement Consultant warrants that it has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform this AGREEMENT. Each party warrants to the other that the signature to this AGREEMENT have the legal power, right, and authority to enter into this AGREEMENT and to bind each party.

M. California Prevailing Wage Requirement Pursuant to California Labor Code sections 1720 through 1861, the Consultant, its Contractor and all subcontractors shall ensure that all workers who perform work under this Agreement are paid not less than the prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), if applicable. This includes work performed during the design, site assessment, feasibility ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
10 study, and other preconstruction phases of construction, including but not limited to inspection and land surveying work, regardless of whether any further construction work is conducted, and work performed during the post-construction phases of construction, including but not limited to all cleanup work at the jobsite. The most current prevailing wage determination can be found at https://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

THIS SPACE PURPOSELY LEFT BLANK.

0,30)}}
ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
11 TO EFFECTUATE THIS AGREEMENT, each of the parties has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized representative as of the date set forth in the introductory paragraph on page 1 above.

CITY OF MANTECA: CONSULTANT:

KLEINFELDER, INCORPORATED
_________________________________ ___________________________________ Toni Lundgren (Type name of Consultant/form of organization)* City Manager
ATTEST: By: ___________________________________
(Signature)
_________________________________ ___________________________________ Cassandra Candini-Tilton, (Type name and title)
Director of Legislative Services

COUNTERSIGNED: By: ___________________________________
(Signature)

_________________________________ ___________________________________ Matthew Boring (Type name and title)
Director of Finance

COUNTERSIGNED: Address: ____________________________

_________________________________ ____________________________ Stephanie Van Steyn,
Director of Human Resources Telephone: ____________________________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Andy Pinasco, Interim City Attorney
By:_________________________________
Kousha Mckeenejad, Deputy City Attorney
Johan Jacobsen, PE
Program Manager/NCP Service Line Lead, CoMET
2001 Arch Airport Rd, Suite 100
Stockton, CA 95206
916-897-0001
ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
12 EXHIBIT A
Scope of Work
ATTACHMENT 8
City of Manteca | Proposal for On-Call Materials Testing Services | 2

C TECHNICAL PROPOSAL CONTENT
A. QUALIFICATIONS, RELATED EXPERIENCE, AND REFERENCES
Kleinfelder’s proposed team offers the experience, resources, and local knowledge necessary to deliver the required services. The following section outlines the team’s qualifications and related experience, emphasizing key strengths:
• Extensive experience performing work of similar scope and complexity • Demonstrated success collaborating with local agencies and cities directly involved in this project • Robust staffing capability and resource availability
• Effective workload management- Consistent record of meeting project schedules on comparable assignments • Supportive client references highlighting performance and reliability i. FIRM PROFILE: KLEINFELDER
Founded in Stockton, California, in 1961, Kleinfelder is a leading engineering, construction management, construction materials engineering and testing, design, and professional environmental services firm. Kleinfelder provides comprehensive, full-service engineering and environmental solutions, including planning, design, permitting, and construction phase services. Since its founding 65 years ago, Kleinfelder has delivered construction materials engineering and testing, construction quality assurance, for public infrastructure, roadways, bridges, and buildings.

Year Founded: 1961
Form of Organization: Corporation
Types of Services Offered: Engineering (civil, structural, geotechnical), environmental consulting, planning, architecture, construction management, materials testing, and inspection services Comprehensive Service Areas: Planning, design, permitting, construction phase services, water/wastewater, environmental resources, geotechnical, surveys/plats, structures, utilities, transportation, traffic, site development, mechanical/electrical/ plumbing, GIS, CADD, and construction management and inspection Number, Size, and Location of Offices: 98 offices across the United States, Canada, and Australia, including eight northern California offices in Stockton, Fresno, Hayward, Pittsburg, Rancho Cordova, San Francisco, San Jose, and Santa Rosa Number of Employees: More than 3,200 professionals company-wide, with approximately 325 in northern California With this depth of regional resources and experience, Kleinfelder offers the City of Manteca efficient, cost-effective project delivery characteristic of a national firm, while maintaining a local touch. ii. FIRM’S CURRENT FINANCIAL CONDITION
Kleinfelder Inc. is a large firm and is involved in thousands of projects per year. Many of these projects are large and complex and typically generate a variety of claims and disputes, some of which evolve into formal legal proceedings. These proceedings typically involve all design consultants, including Kleinfelder Inc. regardless of scope and responsibility. In a number of these proceedings, Kleinfelder Inc. has been named as a defendant despite our belief that the firm has no liability. Kleinfelder Inc. does not believe that any of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the operations of the Company or its ability to perform.

There are no pending mergers, bankruptcies, or planned office closures, and the firm is confident there are no conditions that would impede its ability to complete the On-Call Materials Testing Services project.

EXHIBIT 10-Q DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES has been provided in the appendix section.

ATTACHMENT 8
City of Manteca | Proposal for On-Call Materials Testing Services | 3 iii. FIRM AND KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS AND FEDERAL AID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Kleinfelder possesses a distinguished record of delivering construction management and materials testing services for federally funded infrastructure projects, demonstrating extensive experience in adherence to federal aid requirements and agency standards. The firm’s portfolio includes successful assignments for state and local agencies, such as Caltrans, the City of Stockton, San Joaquin County, and various municipalities throughout California’s Central Valley and Bay Area.

This experience encompasses highways, bridges, interchanges, water and wastewater infrastructure, and public works improvements, all performed under the rigorous documentation and quality standards required for federal aid projects.

The City of Manteca is already well acquainted with Kleinfelder’s materials testing, geotechnical, and environmental capabilities, backed by more than 20 years of successful service.

Our approach is grounded in a thorough comprehension of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines, and the specific requirements for federally funded construction management.

The firm’s teams possess skill in navigating the complexities of federal, state, and local adherence, including documentation and quality assurance. Kleinfelder’s materials testing laboratories are Caltrans-certified, and the firm’s personnel hold the necessary certifications to perform and document testing and examination services in accordance with federal and state standards.

Key personnel proposed for this project bring direct, relevant experience managing and executing federal aid construction management assignments:

STEVEN WIESNER, PE, GE
Engineer of Record
Steven Wiesner brings over 20 years of experience in geotechnical engineering, construction management, and materials testing and inspection services. He has managed geotechnical engineering studies for public bridge and roadway infrastructure, dam and levee evaluations, water and wastewater infrastructure, pipelines, and rail projects. Mr. Wiesner has extensive experience working with federal, state, and local agencies, including the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), California Department of Water Resources (DWR), and Caltrans. His federal aid construction management experience includes serving as Task Order Manager for the USACE Lower San Joaquin Levee Geotechnical Investigations, overseeing 385 explorations across six levee systems, and managing geotechnical investigations, laboratory testing, analysis, and reporting in accordance with federal standards. He has also led federally funded levee evaluation and certification projects, including the Urban and Non-Urban Levee Evaluations Program and the Bishop Tract and Atlas Tract Urban Level of Flood Protection Levee Evaluations, all requiring compliance with federal and state criteria for flood protection and permitting.

ATTACHMENT 8
City of Manteca | Proposal for On-Call Materials Testing Services | 4

JIMMY ZEPEDA, DOT, ACI, ICC
Materials Operations Supervisor / Lead Inspector
Jimmy Zepeda has over 30 years of experience as a materials inspector, including 28 years with Kleinfelder. He holds numerous ICC certifications, including Master of Special Inspection, and is a Caltrans-certified quality tester for a wide range of test methods. Mr. Zepeda’s expertise includes testing and observation services for concrete placement, reinforcing steel, prestressed and posttensioning operations, welding verification, masonry, asphalt, and batch plant inspections. He has served as lead inspector for federally funded projects such as the I-5/French Camp Road Interchange Improvement and State Route 132/Bird Road Interchange, providing quality assurance testing and inspection services in accordance with federal, state, and local requirements.

Collectively, this team demonstrates a robust record of managing and delivering federally funded construction projects, with deep knowledge of federal aid requirements, quality assurance, and compliance with Caltrans and USACE standards.

Their combined experience covers all aspects of construction management, materials testing, inspection, and program oversight for complex infrastructure projects.

JOHAN JACOBSEN, PE
Program Manager
Johan Jacobsen is a Professional Engineer with nearly 27 years of experience in geotechnical engineering, materials engineering, and program management. He has managed over 100 engineering and construction projects, including federally funded transportation and infrastructure improvements. Mr. Jacobsen’s expertise includes the administration and management of public construction projects and contracts, quality assurance/quality control program delivery, and technical review of earthwork, concrete, and asphalt specifications. He has served as Program Manager for major airport and highway projects, such as the SMForward Expansion Program at Sacramento International Airport and the I-5 French Camp Interchange, providing construction management, materials testing, and quality assurance services in compliance with federal aid requirements and Caltrans standards.

LANCE YOUNG
Project Manager
Lance Young offers over 38 years of experience in construction management, technical field testing, and materials inspection for transportation and public works projects. He is proficient in laboratory and field testing per ASTM, Caltrans, USACE and other federal and state standards. Mr. Young has managed construction testing and inspection services for bridge replacements, water treatment facilities, and roadway projects, ensuring compliance with federal aid requirements. His experience includes batch plant inspections, field density testing, and construction inspections for federally funded infrastructure projects.

ATTACHMENT 8
City of Manteca | Proposal for On-Call Materials Testing Services | 5 iv. EXPERIENCE WORKING WITH GOVERNMENT APPROVAL AGENCIES Kleinfelder has extensive experience providing on-call construction materials testing services for municipal capital improvement and private development projects that require review, acceptance, and approval by local and state agencies.

Most notably, Kleinfelder currently provides on-call materials testing services to the City of Manteca, directly supporting projects under the City’s jurisdiction and approval authority.

For the City of Manteca, Kleinfelder has delivered materials testing services for a broad range of projects, including parks, trails, streets, utility pipelines, storm drain and sanitary sewer pump stations, and drainage basins. These projects require close coordination with City Engineering staff and inspectors and strict compliance with City of Manteca standards, Caltrans Standard Specifications, and applicable ASTM and AASHTO testing procedures used to support construction acceptance and approvals.

Kleinfelder’s specialized experience includes soils and aggregate sampling and testing, concrete sampling and compressive strength testing, Hot Mix Asphalt sampling and testing, and special inspections for structural steel, masonry, and concrete.

All testing and inspection services are performed in accordance with agency requirements, with clear, timely documentation provided to facilitate efficient review, acceptance, and approval of construction activities.

Our approach is to function as a seamless extension of City staff, coordinating all testing services through the City’s designated point of contact. Services are delivered through an integrated model consisting of project management, field testing, and laboratory testing, ensuring consistent communication, rapid response times, and reliable results. This approach has supported on-time and on-budget project delivery for City projects.

Professional competence is further demonstrated through our ability to provide materials and geotechnical engineering consultation during construction, allowing real-time review of field conditions and prompt resolution of issues affecting testing, approval, or schedule. This capability has reduced delays and supported expedited construction progress.

Kleinfelder’s local presence and familiarity with City procedures enable quick mobilization of qualified personnel, often within hours of a service request.

These services are overseen by our experienced Project Manager, Lance Young, who coordinates testing protocols, reporting requirements, and communication procedures with City staff. QA/QC oversight by Jimmy Zepeda, DOT, ACI, ICC, a senior licensed engineer ensuring that all materials testing services meet City and regulatory standards and directly support project approval requirements.
v. WORK EXPERIENCE
We have experience providing materials testing and special inspection services for public agencies throughout the region.

The following list highlights relevant past work, including project identification, a summary of roles and responsibilities, and verified client references knowledgeable about the services provided. No sub-vendors were utilized on these contracts; all work was performed by Kleinfelder personnel.

Project Name: ON-CALL MATERIAL TESTING & SPECIAL INSPECTION SERVICES Client: City of Stockton Public Works Department
Contract Duration: 2019 – Current
Description of Services: Kleinfelder provides materials engineering and testing services on a continuous basis, adjusting staffing levels as needed to support various bridges, streets, underground utilities (sanitary sewer, storm drainage, and water supply), and capital projects throughout the City of Stockton. Representative projects include the Wilson Way Roadway Improvements, Hazelton UPRR Safety Improvements, Little John Creek Embankment Emergency Repair, Fire Station #6 Modifications, and the Benjamin Holt Drive Signal Improvement.

Roles & Responsibilities: Kleinfelder was responsible for all materials testing and special inspection services, including field and laboratory testing, construction observation, and reporting. No sub-vendors were engaged.

Key Personnel: Steven Wiesner, PE, GE and Jimmy Zepeda, DOT, ACI, ICC Client References:

Jason Ender, Construction Engineering Supervisor
City of Stockton
425 N. El Dorado Street, Stockton, CA 95202
t | 209.937.8381
e | [email protected]
Wes Johnson, PE, Engineering Services Manager
City of Stockton
425 N. El Dorado Street, Stockton, CA 95202
t | 209.937.8088
e | [email protected]
ATTACHMENT 8
City of Manteca | Proposal for On-Call Materials Testing Services | 6 Project Name: ON-CALL MATERIALS ENGINEERING & TESTING SERVICES Client: San Joaquin County Department of Public Works
Contract Duration: 2019 – Current
Description of Services: Kleinfelder provides continuous materials engineering and testing services for bridges, streets, underground utilities, and capital projects throughout San Joaquin County. Projects include Stockton Metro Airport Taxiway, Juvenile Justice Center, Woodbridge Road, Sidewalk Accessibility Improvements (2019–2020), Middle Road Resurfacing, Countywide Chip Seal (2019–2020 and 2021–2022), Road District 4 Resurfacing (2021–2022), and the McArthur Road Bridge.

Roles & Responsibilities: Kleinfelder performed all field and laboratory materials testing, construction observation, and reporting. No sub-vendors were engaged.

Key Personnel: Steven Wiesner, PE, GE and Jimmy Zepeda, DOT, ACI, ICC Client Reference:

Emmanuel Salcedo
San Joaquin County Department of Public Works
1810 E. Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95205
t | 209.468.3000
e | [email protected]
Project Name: ON-CALL MATERIALS TESTING & ENGINEERING SERVICES Client: City of Turlock
Contract Duration: 2018 – Current
Description of Services: Kleinfelder provides field and testing services for Portland cement concrete and sampling and testing of hot mix asphalt for various roadway and infrastructure projects. Representative projects include Headstrom Road Improvements, Washington Road Bridge Railing Repair, Safe Routes to School, RWQCF Improvements Project, Northeast Turlock Roads Rehabilitation Program, and the Various Roads Improvement Program.

Roles & Responsibilities: Kleinfelder was responsible for all materials testing and engineering services, including field and laboratory testing, construction observation, and reporting. No sub-vendors were engaged.

Key Personnel: Steven Wiesner, PE, GE and Jimmy Zepeda, DOT, ACI, ICC Client Reference:

Stephen Fremming, Principal Civil Engineer
City of Turlock
156 S. Broadway, Suite 150, Turlock, CA 95380
t | 209.668.5417
e | [email protected]
These references are directly knowledgeable about the scope, scale, and quality of services provided by Kleinfelder on projects similar in nature to those described by the City for this solicitation.

B. PROPOSED STAFFING AND PROJECT ORGANIZATION
This section of the proposal establishes the method that will be used to manage the project as well as identify key personnel assigned. Specifically:
i. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
Johan Jacobsen, PE, is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of California and will oversee and/or perform the materials testing services for this project. Steven Wiesner, PE, GE, is also a registered Professional Engineer in California and will provide additional technical oversight. Both meet the City’s requirement for a California-registered PE on the project team.
ii. RESUMES
Please reference the appendix section for resumes of Key Personnel.

ATTACHMENT 8
City of Manteca | Proposal for On-Call Materials Testing Services | 7 v. ASSURANCE OF KEY PERSONNEL AVAILABILITY
Kleinfelder affirms that key personnel identified for this project will be available as proposed for the duration of the assignment. No individual designated as “key” to the project will be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of the City.

Key
Personnel
Current
Location Proposed Position Current Assignment
Level of
Commitment Availability Years the Firm
Steven Wiesner, PE, GE Stockton, CA Engineer of Record Various 50% 100% 20 Johan Jacobsen, PE Sacramento, CA Program Manager Various 50% 100% 11 Lance Young Stockton, CA Project Manager Various 80% 100% 1 Jimmy Zepeda, DOT, ACI, ICC Stockton, CA Materials Operations Supervisor/Lead Inspector Various 80% 100% 28
iv. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Steven Wiesner, PE, GE

ENGINEER OF RECORD
Lance Young
Jimmy Zepeda, DOT, ACI, ICC
Johan Jacobsen, PE

PROGRAM MANAGER

PROJECT MANAGER
13 MATERIALS OPERATIONS

SUPERVISOR / LEAD INSPECTOR
LEGEND
Key personnel
iii. KEY PERSONNEL

MATERIAL TESTING FIELD
& LAB TECHNICIANS
ATTACHMENT 8
City of Manteca | Proposal for On-Call Materials Testing Services | 8 C. WORK PLAN
This Work Plan presents Kleinfelder’s approach to delivering on-call materials testing services and demonstrates a clear understanding of the City of Manteca’s project needs, schedules, and quality expectations. The narrative directly addresses the Scope of Services and is organized to align with the City’s evaluation criteria. i. APPROACH AND WORK PLAN
Our approach is designed to provide reliable, responsive, and technically consistent materials testing support for both project development and City capital improvement projects. Our work plan emphasizes early coordination, rapid mobilization, strict adherence to specifications, and clear communication. Demonstrating all services are delivered within established timeframes and without disruption to construction activities.

For each task assignment, Project Manager, Lance Young, will oversee execution from initiation through close-out, supported by Steven Wiesner, PE, GE, Engineer of Record, Materials Operations Supervisor, Jimmy Zepeda, DOT, ACI, ICC, and certified field and laboratory technicians. This structure ensures continuity, accountability, and compliance throughout the on-call contract term.

Key elements of our work plan include:
• Responsiveness: All service requests are acknowledged within 24 hours, with personnel and equipment mobilized within seven calendar days, or sooner as required by project conditions. • Integrated Coordination: Field staff coordinate directly with City inspectors and contractors to confirm schedules, site readiness, and inspection coverage.
• Technical Support: Lance Young and technical staff remain available throughout construction to interpret test results and support City staff and applicants.
• Transparent Documentation: Daily electronic logs, photographs, and videos are provided for all field activities, with test results reported promptly after completion.
• Comprehensive Testing Capability: Full-scope materials testing is provided for soils, subgrades, aggregates, asphalt, structural concrete, compaction, and associated materials in accordance with contract requirements.

This approach enables predictable execution, regulatory compliance, and uninterrupted support for the City’s construction program.
ii. SEQUENTIAL ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENT OF PERSONNEL
Kleinfelder performs materials testing services through a clearly defined, sequential process, with responsibilities assigned to qualified staff at each stage.

SEQUENTIAL WORK ACTIVITIES

1. Project Onboarding
• Lance Young, Project Manager, reviews approved plans, specifications, and testing requirements; establishes project setup; and coordinates preconstruction meetings with City staff. Mr. Young will be available by means of phone or other methods to discuss test results and technical questions for the duration of the project’s lifespan.
• Steven Wieser, Engineer of Record, provides technical oversight and guidance on applicable testing protocols.

2. Dispatching and Scheduling
• Service requests are processed through Kleinfelder’s centralized dispatch system. • Jimmy Zepeda, the Materials Operations Supervisor, schedules certified field and laboratory staff and confirms mobilization with City inspectors.

3. Field Sampling and Testing
• Certified field technicians perform required sampling and in-place testing for soil, aggregates, base materials, asphalt, and concrete, including slump, temperature, compaction, and cylinder preparation. • Field personnel document activities using electronic logs, photographs, and videos.

ATTACHMENT 8
City of Manteca | Proposal for On-Call Materials Testing Services | 9

4. Laboratory Testing
• Accredited laboratory staff conduct analyses such as sieve analysis, ASTM moisture-density relationships, R-values, sand equivalent, durability index, plasticity index, plasticity index and concrete compressive strength testing.
• Interim results are internally reviewed by Lance Young, Project Manager, and Steven Wiesner, PE, GE, Engineer of Record.

5. Reporting and Communication
• Daily logs and test results are transmitted to the City within required timeframes. • Final reports are reviewed for completeness and clarity prior to submission, with staff available to discuss findings or corrective actions.

6. Contract Administration
• Lance Young will prepare and submit detailed monthly invoices documenting personnel, labor hours, and taskspecific costs in accordance with contract requirements. iii. QUALITY CONTROL AND SCHEDULE CONTROL METHODS
Kleinfelder applies consistent quality assurance and schedule control measures across all field and laboratory material testing activities to ensure accuracy, compliance, and timely delivery.

Quality and schedule control methods include:
• Standardized Testing Procedures: All testing is performed in accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, Caltrans, and City-adopted standards.
• Certified Personnel: Field and laboratory staff maintain appropriate certifications and participate in ongoing training to sustain technical proficiency.
• Internal Review: Lance Young, Project Manager, and Steven Wiesner, PE, GE, Engineer of Record will review test data and reports prior to submission. Any discrepancies or non-compliant results are immediately addressed with City staff and contractors.
• Pre-Task Coordination: Pre-mobilization briefings and schedule confirmations ensure alignment with site conditions and construction sequencing.
• Digital Documentation: Electronic logs, photo/video documentation, and daily reporting support transparency, progress tracking, and issue resolution.
• Resource Flexibility: Staff are primarily deployed from the Stockton office and supplemented as needed from other regional locations (billed as Stockton), ensuring service continuity during peak workload periods.

These controls support consistent quality, schedule reliability, and clear project oversight for all testing services. iv. ENHANCEMENTS AND PROCEDURAL INNOVATIONS
Kleinfelder incorporates procedural and technical enhancements that improve efficiency and transparency while fully supporting the objectives of the Scope of Services.

Enhancements include:
• Advanced Digital Reporting: A secure digital platform provides near real-time access to daily field logs, photos, and test results, improving visibility and decision-making. • Centralized Dispatch: All mobilizations are coordinated through a dedicated dispatch center with after-hours coverage, supporting both routine and urgent response needs. • Scalable Staffing Model: Access to more than 100 trained field and technical staff across multiple locations allows rapid adjustment to fluctuating workload demands.
• Proactive Communication: Project managers and technical leads maintain regular contact with City representatives and remain readily available to address questions or concerns. • Centralized Billing and Records Management: Invoicing, documentation, and quality records are centrally managed to ensure accuracy, consistency, and audit readiness.

These enhancements support efficient project delivery, predictable performance, and strong collaboration with the City of Manteca.

ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
13 EXHIBIT B
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR CODE § 3700
[Labor Code § 1861]
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this AGREEMENT.

CONSULTANTS
By:
[Title]
Johan Jacobsen, PE
Program Manager/NCP Service Line Lead - CoMET
ATTACHMENT 8
Agreement for Services
14 EXHIBIT C
Fee and Deliverables Schedule
ATTACHMENT 8
KLEINFELDER, INC – NorCal Pacific Area, Construction Services 2026 RATE SCHEDULE
Developed for: City of Manteca: RFP On-Call Materials Testing Services Kleinfelder Fee Schedule 2026_NCP_COMET
Page | 1 of 2 Revised 02/2026

TECHNICIAN NON-PREVAILING WAGE (OFF-SITE) RATES
Technician * - ACI/Soils/Asphalt Testing & Observation............................................................ $ 130/ hour Special Inspector* - ICC Certified Structural Inspector (Masonry, Shotcrete and PT Slab Services, Reinforced Concrete, High Strength Bolting, and Floor Flatness)......................................... $ 145/ hour
Special Inspector* - CWI/NDT/NACE (Welding, NDT, NACE) ..................................................... $ 165/ hour

TECHNICIAN PREVAILING WAGE (ON-SITE & TRAVEL) RATES
Masonry/Lead Inspector*^ (G1-NC 63-3-9-2025-1) .................................................................. $ 254/ hour Building/Const Inspector*^ (G2-NC 63-3-9-2025-1) .................................................................. $ 249/ hour Soils/Asphalt Tech*^ (G3-NC 63-3-9-2025-1) ............................................................................ $ 175/ hour Concrete ACI Inspector*^ (G4-NC 63-3-9-2025-1)..................................................................... $ 175/ hour

PROFESSIONAL STAFF RATES
Professional* ............................................................................................................................. $ 152/ hour Staff Professional*..................................................................................................................... $ 175/ hour Project/Senior Professional ....................................................................................................... $ 225/ hour Principal Professional ................................................................................................................ $ 270/ hour Senior Principal Professional ..................................................................................................... $ 315/ hour Senior Technical Manager or Major Accounts Manager............................................................ $ 350/ hour Project Manager I ...................................................................................................................... $ 200/ hour Project Manager II ..................................................................................................................... $ 230/ hour Materials Manager or Materials Operations Supervisor............................................................ $ 230/ hour Senior Project Manager ............................................................................................................ $ 275/ hour Program Manager ..................................................................................................................... $ 280/ hour Senior Program Manager........................................................................................................... $ 350/ hour Project Controls Professional*................................................................................................... $ 137/ hour Senior Project Controls Professional ......................................................................................... $ 210/ hour Administrator/Dispatch* .......................................................................................................... $ 115/ hour

OVERTIME & MINIMUMS
 Overtime or Double-time applies to * rates above. Time worked in excess of 8 hours per day, and Saturday work will be charged at 1.5X the hourly rate shown. Time worked in excess of 12 hours per day, and Sunday or Holiday work will be charged at 2.0X the hourly rate shown.
 4-hour minimum for onsite inspectors will apply, with 2-hour increments thereafter.  Show-up/No Work or cancellations <24 hours in advance will be subject to a 2-hour minimum charge.

PREVAILING WAGE
 Public works projects or projects receiving public funds may be subject to Prevailing Wage (PW) laws. The above rates marked ^ apply to NC 63-3-9-2025-1 prevailing wages. Second/Night shift rates (not shown) apply to any ATTACHMENT 8
KLEINFELDER, INC – NorCal Pacific Area, Construction Services 2026 RATE SCHEDULE
Developed for: City of Manteca: RFP On-Call Materials Testing Services Kleinfelder Fee Schedule 2026_NCP_COMET
Page | 2 of 2 Revised 02/2026
work starting after 2pm or before 4am and will incur a 12.5% surcharge on the base rate of the corresponding group rate in accordance with California DIR shift provisions.  Prevailing wage billing rates will increase 4% per hour on July 1st of each year beginning July 1st, 2026 to account for the predetermined increases for determination NC 63-3-9-2025-1.  Travel time will be charged at the prevailing wage rate, as required per the determination and the Public Works Manual Section 4.1.5.
 PW rates will be charged, including retroactively, for the covered scope items if the DIR directs that this is covered work at any time during the life of this agreement, or thereafter.  Kleinfelder reserves the right to increase billing rates following any change to an applicable Master Labor Agreement during the life of a PLA project.

ESCALATION & BILLING
 Laboratory Testing Rates are in accordance with “2026 Kleinfelder Fee Schedule for Geotechnical and Materials Laboratory Testing Services” dated January 2026 and attached herein  Subcontractor Fees and Other Direct Costs to be reimbursed at cost plus 10%.  Travel related expenses to be reimbursed at cost. Mileage to be billed at current IRS rate.  Hourly rates shall be escalated annually on January 1 of each calendar year, starting 1/1/2027. Labor Escalation Rate to be 5%.
 Hourly rates assume that other direct costs will be billed and reimbursed by the client. Kleinfelder reserves the right to adjust the rate schedule on projects where other direct costs are not reimbursed.

MATERIALS TESTING EQUIPMENT
Equipment Invoice Name Test Method† Price
Anchor Bolt Testing Device ANCHOR BOLT TST/DAY $150.00 / day Brinell Hardness Tester BRINELL HARDNESS/DAY E10 $20.00 /day Concrete Rebound (Schmidt) Hammer SCHMIDT HAMMER/DAY C805 $55.00 / day Concrete Vapor Emission Test Kit MOIST FLOOR/SLAB TST F1869 $30.00 / kit FerroScan Equipment FERROSCAN EQUIPMENT $275.00 /day
Hand Auger and Soil Sampler HAND AUGER/DAY $75.00 /day
Magnetic Particle Testing Device MAGNETIC PARTICLE ASNT, AWS B1.1 $45.00 /day Skidmore Bolt Tension Calibrator SKID WILH BOLT/DAY A325, A490 $55.00 / day Torque Wrench, up to 1,000 foot-pounds TORQUE WRENCH/DAY A325, A490 $50.00 / day Ultrasonic Testing Device UT TESTING EQUIP/DAY ASNT, AWS B1.1 $75.00 /day Nuclear Soil Density /Moisture Gauge NUCLEAR DENS GAUGE D6938 $31.00 / hour ATTACHMENT 8

KLEINFELDER FEE SCHEDULE FOR
GEOTECHNICAL and MATERIALS LABORATORY TESTING SERVICES
Prepared for City of Manteca: RFP On-Call Materials Testing Services †Common ASTM, AASHTO and DOT test methods.
• Those beginning with A, B, C, D, E, F, or G are ASTM methods. • Those beginning with T are AASHTO methods.

Page 1 of 8 ends

Kleinfelder Laboratory Fee Schedule 2025/2026

SOIL COMPACTION TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Standard Proctor D698, T99 $ 580
Modified Proctor D1557, T180 $ 580
Proctor Correction for Oversize Material D4718 $ 360
Rapid Determination of Compaction* D5080 $ 580
1-Point Proctor, Check Point T272 $ 455
Treated Soil Proctor D558 $ 680
Minimum and Maximum Relative Density D4254, D4253 $ 1075 Maximum Density by Vibratory Hammer D7382 $ 995
Moisture/Density, TEX 113-E TEX113-E $ 580
Moisture/Density, TEX 114-E TEX114-E $ 580
California Impact, CT 216 CT216 $ 555
*Field test only

SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND INDEX TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Visual Classification D2488 $ 290
Water Content D2216, D4643, T265 $ 284
Water Content and Dry Unit Weight D2216, D2937, D7263 $ 312 Sieve Analysis, % Finer than No. 200 Sieve D1140 $ 370
Sieve Analysis, Fine D6913, T88 $ 425
Sieve Analysis, Coarse D6913, T88 $ 425
Sieve Analysis, Coarse and Fine D6913, T88 $ 457
Hydrometer Analysis (Requires a Sieve Analysis, not included) D7928 or D422-withdrawn $ 495 Atterberg Limits, Single Point D4318-B, T89, T90 $ 410
Atterberg Limits, Multiple Point D4318-A, T89, T90 $ 495 Organic Soil Classification (by Atterberg Method) D2487/D4318 $ 600 Soil Specific Gravity D854, T100 $ 555
Soil Organic Content D2974-C $ 420
Thermal Resistivity, Per Point D5334, IEEE 422 $ 690
Thermal Resistivity, Dry-Out Curve D5334, IEEE 422 $ 1530

DISPERSIVE SOIL TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Pinhole Dispersion Classification D4647 $ 960
Double Hydrometer for Dispersive Soils D4221 $ 620
Crumb Test for Dispersive Soils D6572 $ 370
ATTACHMENT 8

Page 2 of 8 ends

Kleinfelder Laboratory Fee Schedule 2025/2026

SOIL CHEMISTRY TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Soil pH D4972, T289 $ 330
Soil Resistivity G57, T288 $ 465
Chloride Content T291 $ 346
Sulfate Content T290-B $ 330
Redox Potential G200 $ 340

TREATED/STABILIZED SOIL TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Eades and Grim Test - Optimum Lime Content C977 $ 545
Stabilized Soil UC Strength, 1 Point (proctor not included) D1633, D5102 $ 495 Stabilized Soil UC Strength, Set of 3 D1633, D5102 $ 1635 CT 373, 1 Lime Content, w/o Opt. Moist. CT373 $ 485
CT 373, 1 Lime Content CT373 $ 745
CT 373, 3 Lime Contents CT373 $ 1,635
CTB Strength, Individual Specimen $ 495
CTB Strength, Set of 3, Without Design $ 775
CTB Complete Mix Design $ Inquire

SOIL BEARING PRESSURE TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
California Bearing Ratio, Single Point (proctor not included) D1883, T193 $ 725 California Bearing Ratio, 3 Points (proctor not included) D1883, T193 $ 1130 Resistance R-Value D2844 $ 690
Resistance R-Value of Treated Material D2844 $ 690
Rock Correction for R-Value D2844 $ 360
Resilient Modulus T307 $ 895
ATTACHMENT 8

Page 3 of 8 ends

Kleinfelder Laboratory Fee Schedule 2025/2026
SOIL STRENGTH, PERMEABILITY and VOLUME CHANGE TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Pocket Penetration Value $ 290
Unconfined Compressive Strength D2166, T208 $ 445
Direct Shear, 1 Point D3080, T236 $ 455
Direct Shear, 3 Points D3080, T236 $ 780
Direct Shear, Residual Strength, Each Point D3080-Modified $ 590 Consolidation without Time Rate Plots D2435-Modified $ 710 Consolidation with 2 Time Rate Plots D2435-A, T216-A $ 855 Consolidation, All Loads with Time Rates D2435-B, T216-B $ 1,130 Consolidation, Additional Rebound, per point $ 325
Collapse Potential D5333 $ 590
One Dimensional Swell – Wetting After Loading, Series D4546-A $ 660 One Dimensional Swell – Wetting After Loading D4546-B $ 485 One Dimensional Swell – Loading After Wetting D4546-C $ 895 Expansion Index D4829 $ 515
Denver Swell Test $ 485
Permeability, Rigid Wall D2434 $ 855
Permeability, Flexible Wall D5084-C $ 780
Triaxial Compression, CU, 1 Point D4767, T297 $ 925
Triaxial Compression, CU, 3 Points D4767, T297 $ 1,930
Triaxial Compression, UU, 1 Point D2850, T296 $ 535
Triaxial Compression, UU, 3 Points D2850, T296 $ 1,110
Triaxial Compression, UU Saturated, 1 Point D2850-Modified $ 660 Triaxial Test, TEX117E, Part I TEX117E $ 2670
Triaxial Test, TEX117E, Part II TEX117E $ 2670
Vane Shear – Hand-Held Torvane ASTM D8121 $ 315
Vane Shear – Motorized D4648 $ 360

ROCK TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Rock Sample Preparation D4543 $ 410
Rock Mohs Hardness IRSM $ 360
Rock Point Load Index, per Point* D5731 $ 232
Rock Slake Durability D4644 $ 520
Rock Splitting Tensile/Brazilian, per Point* D3967 $ 385 Rock Direct Tensile D2936 $ 500
Rock Unconfined Compression D7012-C $ 590
Rock testing fees include routine sample preparation (end grinding) and sample photographs. *Point load and splitting tensile test fees are per break, not per set of ten.

ATTACHMENT 8

Page 4 of 8 ends

Kleinfelder Laboratory Fee Schedule 2025/2026

AGGREGATE TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
ASR Reactivity, Long Method C227, C1293 $ 2,550
ASR Reactivity, Short Method C1260, C1567 $ 1,530
Cleanness Value CT227 $ 475
Clay Lumps and Friable Particles, per size * C142, T112 $ 390 Coarse Specific Gravity & Absorption C127, T85 $ 385
Fine Specific Gravity & Absorption C128, T84 $ 450
Coarse Durability D3744, T210 $ 455
Fine Durability D3744, T210 $ 455
Flat and Elongated Particles, per size * D4791 $ 380
Fractured Faces, per size * D5821, T335 $ 390
Lightweight Pieces (per specific gravity of heavy liquid) C123, T113 $ 650 Los Angeles Abrasion, Large Aggregate C535 $ 520
Los Angeles Abrasion, Small Aggregate C131, T96 $ 520
Mortar Sand Strength C87, CT515 $ 1,130
Organic Impurities C40, T21 $ 385
Sand Equivalent D2419, T176 $ 455
Sieve Analysis, % Finer than No. 200 Sieve C117, T11 $ 370 Sieve Analysis, Fine C136, T27 $ 425
Sieve Analysis, Coarse C136, T27 $ 425
Sieve Analysis, Coarse and Fine C136, T27 $ 465
Soundness of Aggregate, per size * C88, T104 $ 455
Unit Weight C29, T19 $ 340
Water Content D2216, C566, T255 $ 284
Texas Wet Ball Mill TEX116E $ 660
Decantation Wash TEX406A $ 375
Uncompacted Void Content of Fine Aggregate C1252, T304 $ 445 Methylene Blue T330 $ 580
*Tests are billed by each size fraction tested. The quantity of fractions tested is dependent on the sample gradation and test method

FILTER MEDIA TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Filter Media, Sieve Analysis (includes d10, d60, es, cu) AWWA B100 $ 495 Filter Media, Mohs Hardness AWWA B100 $ 495
Acid Solubility AWWA B100 $ 495
ATTACHMENT 8

Page 5 of 8 ends

Kleinfelder Laboratory Fee Schedule 2025/2026

CONCRETE TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Concrete Compression C39 $ 55
Concrete Core Compression C42 $ 375
Concrete Flexural Strength C78 $ 390
Hydraulic Cement Mortar Compression C109 (field cast) $ 292 Concrete Drying Shrinkage, set of 3 C157 $ 940
Concrete Core Thickness C174 $ 32
Concrete Laboratory Trial Batch* C192 $ 2130
Concrete Time of Set by Penetration Resistance C403, C191 $ 2650 Concrete Modulus of Elasticity C469 $ 895
Concrete Splitting Tensile Strength C496 $ 440
Concrete Absorption C497, C642 $ 470
Concrete Cylinder Unit Weight C567 $ 450
Non-Shrink Grout Compression C1107, C579 $ 295
Shotcrete Compression C1140, C1604 $ 346
Shotcrete Core Grading ACI 506.3 $ 450
Concrete Paving Slab Modulus of Rupture C1782 $ 1,270
Concrete Direct Tensile D2936, CRD C164 $ 775
CLSM Compression D4832 $ 312
Lightweight Insulating Concrete Compression, inc. density C495 $ 390 *Includes up to 9 cylinders or 9 flex beams, additional cylinders, beams, or shrinkage prisms charged at individual unit rates.

ROLLER COMPACTED CONCRETE TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
RCC Compression C1435/C39 $ 295
RCC Direct Tensile $ 815
RCC Air Content C1849 $ Inquire
RCC Unit Weight C1849 $ Inquire
RCC Consistency and Density (VeBe) C1170 $ Inquire
RCC Accelerated Cure C1768 - modified $ Inquire
RCC Trial Batch ACI 211.1 $ inquire

MASONRY TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Masonry Grout Compression C1019, C942 $ 295
Masonry Mortar Compression, cube or cylinder C270, C780 $ 295 Masonry Core Compression and Shear CA DSA $ 480
Masonry Prism Compression C1314 $ 420
CMU Absorption and Received Moisture C140 $ 385
CMU Compression C140 $ 390
CMU Dimension Verification C140 $ 315
CMU Lineal Shrinkage C426 $ 625
ATTACHMENT 8

Page 6 of 8 ends

Kleinfelder Laboratory Fee Schedule 2025/2026

ASPHALT MIXTURE TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Air Voids Determination (calculation only) D3203, AI-MS-2 $ 323 VMA Determination (calculation only) AI-MS-2, CT-LP-2 $ 323 VFA Determination (calculation only) AI-MS-2, CT-LP-2 $ 323 Volumetric Properties (calculation only) AI-MS-2, CT-LP-2 $ 323 AC Moisture Content T329 $ 341
Gradation of Extracted Aggregate D5444 $ 420
AC Content by Extraction D2172 $ 655
AC Content by Ignition Oven D6307, T308 $ 465
AC Ignition Oven Correction Factor (once per mix design) D6307 $ 725 Hveem Stability D1560 $ 725
Hveem Stability without Compaction D1560 $ 495
Marshall Stability and Flow (does not include compaction) D6927 $ 485

ASPHALT DESIGN AND DENSITY TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
AC Core Thickness D3549 $ 298
AC Core Unit Weight & Thickness D1188, D2726, D3549 $ 323 Unit Weight, Gyratory Method D6925, T312 $ 690
Unit Weight, Hveem Method D1561 $ 670
Unit Weight, Marshall Method D6926 $ 555
Maximum Theoretical Specific Gravity D2041 $ 475
Moisture Induced Damage (Wet) T283, CT371 $ 1,945
Tensile Strength Ratio (Wet & Dry) T283, CT371 $ 2,730
Hamburg Wheel Track, Set of 2 T324 $ 1,620
Rutting Susceptibility using Asphalt Pavement Analyzer T340 $ 1,770 Index of Retained Strength D1075 $ 1,800
Indirect Tensile Strength, set of 3 (does not include compaction) D6931 $ 1,300 Indirect Tensile Strength of Cored Specimen D6931 $ 725 Caltrans Optimum Bitumen Content OGFC CT368 $ 2,385
Film Stripping CT302 $ 455
Mix Design, Hveem Method CT367 $ Inquire
Mix Design, Marshall Method AI-MS-2 $ Inquire
Mix Design, Superpave Method AI-MS-2 $ Inquire
ATTACHMENT 8

Page 7 of 8 ends

Kleinfelder Laboratory Fee Schedule 2025/2026

EMULSION TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Emulsion Settlement D6930, T59 $ 565
Emulsion Sieve Test D6933, T59 $ 390
Emulsion Storage Stability D6930, T59 $ 495
Emulsion Torsional Recovery CT332 $ 465
Particle Charge D7402, T59 $ 390
Residue by Evaporation D6934, T59 $ 405
Saybolt Viscosity D7946, T59 $ 465
Slurry Seal Wet Track Abrasion D3910, ISSA TB100 $ 725

REINFORCING BAR TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Bend A370, E290 $ 315
Rebar Tensile, up to No. 11 A370, E8 $ 380
Rebar Tensile, No. 14 and No. 18 A370, E8 $ 575
Rebar Coupler Slip A370, A1034, CT670 $ 490
Rebar Coupler Tensile, up to No. 11 A370, A1034, CT670 $ 410 Rebar Coupler Tensile, No. 14 and No. 18 A370, A1034, CT670 $ 625 Rebar Welded Hoop Tensile A370, CT670 $ 410
Headed Rebar Tensile, up to No. 11 A370, A970 $ 400
Headed Rebar Tensile, No. 14 and No. 18 A370, A970 $ 600 Epoxy Coating Thickness A775, A934 $ 390
Epoxy Coating Continuity – Holiday Test A775, A934 $ 390 Epoxy Flexibility - Bending A775, A934 $ 390

HIGH STRENGTH BOLT TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Bolt Assembly Suite (Bolt, Nut, Washer) * F606 $ 580
Bolt Hardness E18 $ 293
Bolt Proof Load F606 $ 315
Bolt Wedge Tensile F606 $ 320
Nut Hardness E18 $ 293
Nut Proof Load F606 $ 315
Washer Hardness E18 $ 293
*An assembly is one bolt, nut, and washer. The suite consists of a bolt wedge tensile test, bolt and nut proof load tests, and hardness tests on each piece.

ATTACHMENT 8

Page 8 of 8 ends

Kleinfelder Laboratory Fee Schedule 2025/2026

METALS TESTS
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
PT Strand Tensile A370, A1061 $ 605
Anchor Bolt Tensile, up to 1.5” dia. F1554 $ 455
Anchor Bolt Tensile, greater than 1.5” dia. F1554 $ 625 Reduced Section Tensile* A370 $ 520
Modulus of Elasticity** A370 $ 550
Bolt Thread Pitch Verification $ 425
Rockwell Hardness E18 $ 293
Macroetch E381 $ 750
Charpy Impact, Set of 3 *** A370, A673 $ 1,250
Galvanization Thickness B499, E376 $ 288
Fireproofing Density E605 $ 375
*Machining test specimens is not included.
**In addition to the reduced section tensile fee
***Machining test specimens is not included. Additional fees will be assessed for testing at temperatures other than 40°F.

SAMPLE PREPARATION AND DISPOSAL
Test Standard Test Method†Fee
Sample Cutting and Trimming n/a $ 295
Sample Preparation n/a $ 330
Sample Remolding n/a $ 360
Contamination Fee n/a $ varies
Sample Disposal Fee n/a $ varies
ATTACHMENT 8

Manteca City CouncilJune 16, 2026

Manteca City Council
June 16, 2026