Maricopa City Council Agenda
Tuesday, May 12, 2026
6:00 PM
Location: Gusher Hall, 271 California Street, Maricopa, CA 93252 Also available through Zoom Video Conferencing:
https://zoom/us.join Meeting ID:844 9699 0009 Passcode:080881 Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
II. Roll Call
Mayor Cory Morse City Administrator Eric Ziegler
Mayor Pro Tem Virgil Bell City Attorney Alan Peake
Council Member Crystal Harris City Treasurer Dorine Horn Council Member John Horn City Clerk Meghan Wilson
Council Member James Owens
III. Community Recognition
IV. Reorder of Agenda
Council Reports/Statements
a. Report by Public Safety/Sheriff Department/Fire Department b. City Clerk Meghan Wilson
c. City Treasurer Dorine Horn
d. City Administrator Eric Ziegler
e. City Attorney Alan Peake
f. City Council Members
g. Mayor Cory Morse
VI. Public Hearings
VII. Public Commentary
Persons wishing to address the council on items within its jurisdiction, but not on this agenda, may do so now. Any items presented to the council at this time will not be acted upon.
Please note: State law allows the City Council to briefly respond to questions on items raised by the public which are not on the agenda Govt. Code Section Code § 54954.2(a). Alternatively, the Council may choose to direct staff to provide information at the following meeting. Any member of the public may comment on any matter within the jurisdiction of the city that is not on this agenda. Those wishing to comment should be recognized by the mayor and approach the podium.
Please complete a Speaker's Form and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting to be acknowledged as a speaker.
VIII. Approval of Minutes
a. Approve Maricopa City Council Regular Agenda Minutes for April 28, 2026 IX Consent Calendar
Approve payment of current warrants for May 2026
Agendized Items
a. PRESENTATION BY RAQUEL PACHECO WITH KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS RE THE 2026 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (2026 RTP)
Recommendation:
PRESENTATION ONLY. NO COUNCIL ACTION NECESSARY
Recommendation:
a. ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARICOPA ADDING CHAPTER 15.28 TO THE CITY OF MARICOPA MUNICIPAL CODE BY SETTING
FORTH AN EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC
VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65850.7.
Recommendation:
1. MOTION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARICOPA ADDING CHAPTER 15.28 TO THE CITY OF MARICOPA MUNICIPAL CODE BY SETTING FORTH
AN EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65850.7.
XI. New Business
XII. Closed Session
XIII. Come into Open Session
XIV: Council/Staff Items
XV: Adjourn
I certify that a copy of this agenda was posted at Maricopa City Hall, Gusher Hall, and Maricopa Post Office on May 7, 2026.
Meghan Wilson, City Clerk
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City Council Meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (661) 769-8279 at least three (3) days prior to the meeting or time the special services are needed to allow City staff to make reasonable arrangements to provide you with access to the meeting.
Maricopa City Council Minutes
Tuesday, April 28", 2026
Location: Gusher Hall
271 California Street, Maricopa, CA 93252
I. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Morse called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M., followed by the flag salute.
Il. Roll Call
Mayor Cory Morse - Present
Mayor Pro Tem Virgil Bell - Absent
Council Member John Horn - Present
Council Member Crystal Harris - Present
Council Member James Owens - Present
City Administrator Eric Ziegler - Present
City Attorney Alan Peake - Present
City Treasurer Dorine Horn - Present
City Clerk Meghan Wilson - Present
III. Community Recognition
None.
IV. Reorder of Agenda
None.
V. Council Reports/Statements
a. Report by Public Safety/Sheriff Department/Fire Department - • Statistics Submitted: The Sheriff's Office provided activity statistics for the reporting period of April 14-28, 2026.
• Traffic Violations: Council Member Owens reported several occurrences of traffic violations and brought them to the Sheriff's attention for follow-up. • Routine/Criminal Investigations Clarification: Council Member Harris requested clarification regarding the 15 recorded "Routine/Criminal Investigations." The Sheriff explained that these entries represent instances where deputies were present within the city. b. City Clerk Meghan Wilson - None.
c. City Treasurer Dorine Horn - None.
d. City Administrator Eric Ziegler - None.
e. City Attorney Alan Peake - None.
f. City Council Members - None.
g. Mayor Cory Morse - None.
VI. Public Hearings
None.
VIl. Public Commentary
None.
VIII. Approval of Minutes
a. Approve Maricopa City Council Regular Agenda Minutes for April 14t, 2026 Motion to approve by Horn, 2nd by Harris.
Ayes: Harris, Horn, Morse
Noes: Owens
Absent: 0
Abstain: 0
IX. Consent Calendar
a. Approve Payroll for March 2026
Motion to approve by Horn, 2nd by Harris.
Ayes: Harris, Horn, Morse
Noes: Owens
Absent:0
Abstain: 0
b. Approve Payment of Current Warrants for April 2026
Motion to approve by Harris, 2nd by Horn.
Ayes: Harris, Owens, Horn, Morse
Noes: 0
Absent:0
Abstain: 0
X. Agendized Items
a. Introduction of an Ordinance Entitled an Ordinance of the City of Maricopa Adding Chapters 15.28 to the City of Maricopa Municipal Code by Electric Vehicles Charging Stations as Required by Govt. Code Section 65850.7.
1. Motion to waive reading by Owens, 2"d by Horn.
Ayes: Harris, Owens, Horn, Morse
Noes: 0
Absent: 0
Abstain: 0
EV Charging Stations: Richard Albright asked whether the proposed charging stations would be designated for personal use only or available for public use.
2. Motion to introduce ordinance by Owens, 2"d by Horn.
Ayes: Harris, Owens, Horn, Morse
Noes: 0
Absent: 0
Abstain: 0
b. Adoption of Technology Disruption Procedure Policy
Motion to adopt by Horn, 2d by Owens.
Ayes: Harris, Owens, Horn, Morse
Noes: 0
Absent: 0
Abstain: 0
c. Discuss/Provide Direction re Hiring New City Administrator Advertising Discussion: Richard Albright asked where the city planned to advertise the information and suggested utilizing Kern COG as an additional outlet.
Motion to approve a budget of up to $2,000 for advertising by Horn, 2d by Harris.
Ayes: Harris, Owens, Horn, Morse
Noes: 0
Absent: 0
Abstain: 0
XI. New Business
None.
XII. Closed Session
None.
XIII. Come into Open Session
Not Applicable.
XIV: Council/Staff Items
• Council Training: City Attorney Alan Peake reminded the Council that required council training is conducted every two years and will be occurring soon. • Clerk's Note: The City Clerk apologized for errors in the previous meeting minutes, explaining she had been out of state and without service during the review period. • Kern COG / Highway 166: Mayor Morse reported that Kern COG indicated a potential closure of Highway 166 that had not been communicated in advance.
City Attorney Alan Peake recommended notifying staff so the information can be distributed to the community promptly.
• Sheriff's Office Meeting: Mayor Morse also noted a recent discussion with the Sheriff's Office and City Administrator Eric Ziegler. A non-public meeting is scheduled for June 9th, one hour prior to the regular council meeting, to address ongoing matters. These meetings will be held every couple of months.
XV: Adjourn
Motion to end the meeting by Owens, 2"d by Horn.
Ayes: Harris, Owens, Horns, Morse
Noes: 0
Absent:
Abstain: 0
The meeting is adjourned at 6:45 PM.
I certify that a copy of this agenda was posted at Maricopa City Hall, Gusher Hall, and Maricopa Post Office on April 23'd, 2026.
Meghan A. Wilson, City Clerk
WARRANTS TO BE APPROVED FOR MAY 2026
Vendor Description Cost
Ameritas Life Ins. Corp. May 2026 / Dental-$459.84; Vision-$54.76 $ 514.60 Brown & Reich Fuel-April 2026/ Inv.#61423 Mtg, w/Eric; Inv.# 61710 P.W. Yard 1,190.23 IES-Interactive Educational Serv. Website w/Updating, #189676, May 2026 179.00 Kaiser Foundation Health Ins.- June 2026 4,310.99
Kern County Fire Dept. Fire Prevention-2025/2026, May 2026 $ 2,477.92 Kern County Sheriff's Office Fiscal Year 2025/2026 $ 157,008.00 PG&E April 2026; Memorial Park Museum - $1.32
" Gusher Hall $130.45
City Hall $420.03
:
City Park $24.60
: Public Works Yard $146.59
Streets & Outsde Lights $1319.17 2,017.56
True Value April 2026; Park Mnt./Sprinkler Prts & Lock;Sewer Mnt./Degreaser 109.88 Upland Construction Park Grant-Clean CA Project #CCL-5201-001, Inv.#2, March 2026 54,974.20 Verizon Wireless Phones/Public Works & Code Compliance, 3/19-4/18/2026. 217.77
I WILL EMAIL ORIGINAL CHECKLIST TO YOU MONDAY
AGENDA ITEM
TITLE: PRESENTATION BY RAQUEL PACHECO WITH KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS RE THE 2026 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (2026 RTP)
PROPOSED BY: Eric G. Ziegler
MEETING DATE: May 12, 2026
RECOMMENDATION
Presentation Only, No Council Action Necessary
BACKGROUND
See attached correspondence from Kern Council of Governments (Kern Cog).
City Adm.
Approval FISCAL IMPACT:
$
No LI
Eric G. Ziegler Funds Budgeted: Yes Amount Required
Amount Budgeted Appropriation Requested
Account Number Reviewed by Finance
[email protected]
From: Melody Saberon Ybarra < [email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2026 9:34 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Request to be placed on your April or May Maricopa City Council Agenda Hello,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to ask how I might be added to an upcoming city council agenda to have a staff member give an informational presentation. Specifically, I would like to request time for a staff member to give a presentation to the council.
Kern Council of Governments (COG) staff is scheduled to provide an agendized 5-minute presentation to the Maricopa City Council on the 4-year update to the long-range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The plan includes a list of significant transportation projects in the Kern region that may be built over the next 20+ years. Drafts of the RTP, Federal Transportation Improvement Program (the short-term list of projects), Federal Air Quality Conformity and the RTP environmental document are out for public review through July 2, 2026.
The RTP is scheduled to be available for public comment online at https://www.kerncog.org/2026-rtp/ from May 8 to July 2, 2026.
RTP Public Hearings are scheduled for:
• Monday, June 1, 2026 at 6pm the Tehachapi City Council Meeting, Teachapi Police Department Emergency Operations Center, 220 West C Street, Tehachapi, CA 93561 • Thursday, June 18, 2026 at 6:30pm at the Kern COG Board Meeting, Kress Building, 1401 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA 93301
The Kern COG Board is scheduled to approve the documents on August 20, 2026 at 6:30pm Board Meeting.
Could you please provide guidance on the necessary steps, requirements, and any deadlines for agenda submissions? Thank you for your time and assistance. I look forward to your response.
Regards,
Melody
Melody Saberon Ybarra
Administrative Assistant
Direct: 661.635.2912 | Office: 661.635.2900
Email: [email protected]
Kern Council of Governments
1401 19th Street, Suite 300
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Kern Council
of Governments
May 8, 2026
TO: Interested Persons
FROM: Jay Schlosser, Executive Director
RE: Availability of Draft 2026 Regional Transportation Plan (2026 RTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), Draft 2027 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (2027 FTIP), Corresponding Draft Conformity Analysis and Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Public Review
The documents noted above are being released for public review and comment. • The Draft 2026 RTP/SCS is a long-term coordinated transportation/land use strategy to meet Kern County's transportation needs out to the year 2049. 55-day public review from May 8 to July 2. Please follow this link here: http://www.kerncog.org/category/docs/ttp/ • The Draft EIR document provides an analysis of potential environmental impacts related to the implementation of the 2026 RP/SCS as required by the California Environmental Quality Act. 45-day public review from May 18 to July 2. Please follow this link here:
http://www.kerncog.org/category/docs/rtp/
• The Draft 2027 FTIP is a listing of capital improvement and operational expenditures using federal and state monies for transportation projects in Kern County during the next four years. 30-day public review from June 1 to July 2. Please follow this link here:
http://www.kerncog.org/category/docs/ftip/
• The Draft Conformity Analysis contains the documentation to support a finding that the 2026 RTP/SCS and 2027 FTIP meet the air quality conformity requirements for ozone and particulate matter. 30-day public review from June 1 to July 2. Please follow this link here:
http://www.kerncog.org/conformity/
Comments are welcomed at the public hearings 6:00 P.M. June 1, 2026 (Tehachapi) and 6:30 P.M. June 18, 2026 (Bakersfield); comments are due in writing by 5:00 P.M. July 2, 2026. All written comments should be submitted to Kern Council of Governments (Kern COG), 1401 19th Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, CA 93301. The Kern COG Board of Directors will consider the adoption of the 2026 RTP/SCS, EIR, 2027 FTIP, and Conformity Analysis 6:30 P.M. August 20, 2026.
If you have any questions, please contact the following staff:
Ben Raymond, 661/635-2911 or [email protected], for the 2026 RTP/SCS and EIR; Ceasar Valle, 661/635-2917 or [email protected], for the 2027 FTIP; Vincent Liu, 661/635-2913 or [email protected], for the Conformity Analysis Attachments: Draft 2026 RTP Executive Summary and Sub Area Project Listing 1401 19th Street, Suite 300, Bakersfield, California 93301(661) 635-2900 Facsimile (661) 324-8215 TTY (661) 832-7433 www.kercog.org Join us and share your input!
Kern Council
of Governments
The Draft 2026 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) public comment period begins May 8, 2026. Kern COG staff will be presenting information about the RTP/SCS at local city council meetings and the Kern County Board of Supervisors meeting, with public hearings scheduled in Teachapi and Bakersfield.
DATE LOCATION
May 12 @ 5:00PM California City Council Meeting
May 12 @ 6:00PM Maricopa City Council Meeting
May 13 @ 6:00PM McFarland City Council Meeting
May 18 @ ) 5:00PM Delano City Council Meeting
May 19 6:00PM Shafter City Council Meeting
May 19 @ 6:00PM Taft City Council Meeting
May 19 @ 6:00PM Wasco City Council Meeting
May 20 6:00PM Ridgecrest City Council Meeting
May 26 6:00PM Arvin City Council Meeting
June 1 6:00PM *Tehachapi City Council Meeting
June 16 2:00PM Kern County Board of Supervisors Meeting *Kern COG Transportation Planning Policy
June 18 6:30PM
Committee Meeting
June 24 3:30PM Bakersfield City Council Meeting
*Public Hearing
Important dates:
May 8 55-day public review period begins for Draft 2026 RTP/SCS May 18 45-day public review period begins for Draft 2026 RP/SCS Environmental Impact Report
June 1 30-day public review period begins for Draft 2027 Federal Visit our website or
Transportation Improvement Program & Draft Air Quality Conformity scan the QR code
for more details:
Analysis
kerncog.org/2026-rtp/
July 2 Public review period ends for all documents
¡Acompañanos y comparte tu
Kern Council
of Governments opinión!
El periodo de comentarios públicos sobre el Borrador del Plan Regional de Transporte/Estrategia de Comunidades Sostenibles (RTP/SCS) 2026 comienza el 8 de mayo de 2026. El personal del Kern COG presentará información sobre el RTP/SCS en las reuniones de los concejos municipales locales y en la reunion de Supervisores del Condado de Kern. Tambien, se llevarán a cabo audiencias públicas en Tehachapi y Bakersfield.
FECHA UBICACIÓN
12 de mayo a las 5:00 p.m. Reunión del Consejo de California City 12 de mayo a las 6:00 p.m. Reunión de Consejo de Maricopa 13 de mayo a las 6:00 p.m. Reunión de Consejo de McFarland 18 de mayo a las 5:00 p.m. Reunión de Consejo de Delano 19 de mayo a las 6:00 p.m. Reunión de Consejo de Shafter 19 de mayo a las 6:00 p.m. Reunión de Consejo de Taft
19 de mayo a las 6:00 p.m. Reunión de Consejo de Wasco
20 de mayo a las 6:00 p.m. Reunión de Consejo de Ridgecrest 26 de mayo a las 6:00 p.m. Reunión de Consejo de Arvin
1 de junio a las 6:00 p.m. *Reunión de Consejo de Tehachapi 16 de junio a las 2:00 p.m. Reunión de Supervisores del Condado de Kern *Reunión del Comité de Políticas de
18 de junio a las 6:30 p.m. Planificación del Transporte de Kern COG 24 de junio a las 3:30 p.m. Reunión de Consejo de Bakersfield *Audiencias Públicas
Fechas importantes:
8 de mayo Comienza el periodo de revisión pública de 55 días para el Borrador del RTP/SCS 2026
18 de mayo Comienza el periodo de revisión pública de 45 días para el Borrador del Informe de Impacto Ambiental del RTP/SCS 2026
1 de junio Comienza el periodo de revisión pública de 30 días para el Borrador del Programa Federal de Mejoras al Transporte (FTIP) 2027 y el Visit our website or Borrador del Análisis de Conformidad de la Calidad del Aire scan the OR code
for more details:
2 de julio Finaliza el periodo de revisión pública para todos los documentos kerncog.org/2026-rtp/ MARKET
doRk
DRAFT - May 2026
Regional Transportation Plan
Kern Council
of Governments and Sustainable Communities Strategy
Outside Kindergarten Transportagon t
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
systems. The plan is both action-oriented
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY and fiscally informed, addressing near-term (0-5 year) and long-term (15-20+ year)
implementation horizons while maintaining
ABSTRACT
internal consistency between policy
priorities and financial constraints. Core
This Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) elements of the RTP include identification establishes a comprehensive, multimodal transportation issues, regional
vision for a safe, equitable, and sustainable quantification of needs, and development transportation system serving the Kern,
of policies and strategies that guide
one-county region over a 20-plus year decision-making and investment. These planning horizon. Prepared in accordance elements are designed to ensure a with the most recent guidelines adopted by continuous, cooperative, and the California Transportation Commission, comprehensive planning process that the RTP identifies current and future aligns regional priorities with statewide transportation needs, system deficiencies, objectives and supports delivery of and constraints while advancing strategies implementable transportation projects. to improve mobility for people and goods.
The plan integrates land use, environmental The RTP also reflects an inclusive and stewardship, and transportation performance-based planning framework investment decisions to support regional that incorporates stakeholder engagement, and statewide goals, including economic environmental considerations, and vitality, public health, system resilience, evolving mobility trends. Emphasis is and climate change mitigation. This placed on enhancing system safety, comprehensive document incorporates improving accessibility for disadvantaged required sections on Sustainable communities, reducing greenhouse gas Communities Strategy (SCS), Congestion emissions, and increasing transportation Management Program (CMP), growth system efficiency and reliability. Through forecasts, policies, financing, performance collaboration with local jurisdictions, state measures, public outreach and numerous and federal agencies, tribal governments, other requirements. As a long-range policy and direct outreach to the public which has document, the RTP communicates a garnered input from over 10,500 residents, grassroots vision providing a foundation for the RTP advances a grassroots, shared programming and funding decisions. vision for a resilient and integrated transportation network. This approach
Consistent with state and federal
ensures that transportation investments
requirements, the RTP presents a are responsive to regional needs while coordinated and balanced approach to
contributing to broader state and federal
transportation planning across all modes, policy goals and regulatory requirements. including highways, transit, rail, aviation,
goods movement, bicycle, and pedestrian
Kern Council of Governments ES-1
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION The RTP is a 24-year blueprint that
establishes a set of regional transportation
Kern COG was established in 1970 with a goals, policies, and actions intended to joint powers agreement (JPA) between the guide development of the planned eleven cities and the county of Kern, multimodal transportation systems in Kern. creating a governing body made up of It has been developed through a federally elected representatives from each required continuous, comprehensive, and municipality and two of the County cooperative planning process, and provides Supervisors. It is a federally designated effective coordination between local, regional, state and federal agencies on a 4-
The Kern region's air monitoring system year update cycle. has demonstrated an 80%
improvement in NOx emissions since Major Issues - This continuous plan 1980... In addition, the Kern region has development process greatly advances the outperformed the 2020 state goals from prior cycles. For example, greenhouse gas (GHG) target, and this adopted concurrently with the RTP is the plan shows we are on track to achieve federal air quality conformity analysis the 2035 GHG target... for passenger demonstrating attainment of federal Clean vehicles and light-duty trucks Air Act Amendments of 1990. The Kern region's air monitoring system has
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) demonstrated an 80% improvement in NOX and a state designated Regional emissions since 1980, advancing federal Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA). conformity goals. NOx emissions are The JPA and these designations formally precursor gases in the formation of Ozone establish Kern COG's role in transportation and Particulate Matter, health-based planning. Preparing the Regional criteria pollutants.
Transportation Plan (RTP) is one of Kern
COG's primary federal and state roles. Kern region has
In addition, the
outperformed the 2020 state greenhouse
gas (GHG) target required by Senate Bill
Figure ES-1: 1s' in U.S. All Electric Off-Grid Solar Truck Stop on SR 65 in Bakersfield, 50 Spaces - World's Largest Off-Grid EV Solar Charging Facility with 168 Spaces on SR 46 near Lost Hills Kern Council of Governments ES-2
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
(SB) 375, and this plan shows we are on Developed on an 8-year cycle, RHNA goals track to achieve the 2035 GHG target set by for greater housing choices reflect low- the California Air Resources Board (ARB) for income housing need while supporting passenger vehicles/light-duty trucks. The directed transit planning and investment. region's targets were set at 9 percent per Kern COG closely coordinated the RHNA capita reduction by 2020, and the 15 and RTP/SCS development process using percent per capita by 2035 as compared to the same oversight committee for both. 2005. These targets are discussed in the Local jurisdictions use the RHNA goal to Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) identify locations to provide sufficient housing for all economic segments of the
population and ensure that the state's
...goals for greater housing choices housing goals are met. These goals also reflect low-income housing need while include efforts to provide more supporting directed transit planning compact/affordable housing choices that and investment support RTP/SCS investment in transit (See Figure ES-2).
found in Chapter 4 of this Plan.
Continued progress toward the state target In addition to coordination with air quality and federal air conformity budgets will not and housing goals, Kern COG addresses be easy. For both conformity and the SCS, environmental issues in a Program the simple reductions have been achieved Environmental Impact Report (Program and the region needs to fully implement the EIR), prepared pursuant to the California remaining strategies and measures Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), for the identified in this plan such as zero emission RTP. Individual transportation projects are charging infrastructure (See Figure ES-1) if preliminarily identified in the RTP; however, these air emission goals are to be met. the Program EIR analyzes potential environmental impacts from a regional
The SB 375 SCS law also provides for closer perspective, providing opportunities for integration of the RTP/SCS with the Regional streamlining the analysis required in Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) plan. project specific environmental documents.
Figure ES-2: Central Bakersfield Core Area Incentives Have Resulted in 1,300 Units in 10 years Supporting Transit Investment Along Planned Bus Rapid transit/Future Light Rail Corridors Kern Council of Governments ES-3
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Listening to the input on their priorities for the region's long- term future, while balancing survey
Citizens and Stakeholders
responses with more informed, yet perhaps
Our region's continuous public less representative, responses at public participation process encourages events. The outreach featured four participation at every stage of the planning statically valid 1,200-person phone/text process, and all meetings are actively surveys with oversampling in dis- promoted and open to the public.
advantaged communities. The outreach
Community engagement and outreach are process extended from January 2023 fundamental to the development of this
through June 2026. The program provided
numerous opportunities for community
By nature, this plan represents the members, and local stakeholders, and region's mutual vision for its future and local agencies to participate, including was developed using grassroots, bottom public workshops, community events, -up approach, garnering input from over interactive and educational booths at 10,500 residents at over 50 events, festivals and fairs, online via the project public meetings and surveys (online/ website (www.kerncog.org/2026-rtp), phone/text) with Spanish translation, statistically valid phone/text surveys, and across the region over the past 4 years presentations to various community groups (See Figure ES-3).
RTP/SCS. By nature, this plan represents What we heard was that most residents the region's mutual vision for its future and want to maintain, fix and finish what we was developed using a grassroots, bottom- have. A discussion of Kern COG's extensive up approach, garnering input from over public participation activities is found in 10,500 residents at over 50 events, public Chapter 4 of the RTP, and a Summary of meetings and surveys (online/phone/text) Findings is documented in Appendix C of with Spanish translation, across the region the RTP.
over the past 4 years. The community
engagement process gathered residents'
Figure ES-3: Over 10,500 Residents Participated in Over 50 Public Outreach Events and Surveys, Such as Events at an Arvin Church, Taft Festival and Wasco Police Activities League Kern Council of Governments ES-4
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
OUR VISION: Maintain, Fix and Finish What
Kern County is unlike any other region in
We Have
California. Kern's large size and diverse
In response to the extensive grassroots
valley, desert and mountain environs are
public input, the Kern COG RTP process has dominated by agriculture, oil production, placed an emphasis on achieving air
renewable energy, aerospace, military,
emission, safety, and economic goals while recreation, transportation linkages and maintaining, fixing and finishing our other activities that warrant unique and transportation system. The intent of the different approaches to address RTP/SCS SCS chapter 4 is to achieve the state's goals. These economic pursuits are the basis for dispersed rural centers and
The safe, secure, and efficient strategic locations for developments within transportation systems will provide the county that are unlike other areas of the improved access to opportunities, such state. Accordingly, unique strategies are as education, jobs and healthcare. needed to support Kern's equity, economic, and environmental transportation goals.
This uniqueness is reflected in the General
emission reduction targets for automobiles
Plans and programs of Kern County's local
and light trucks. The SCS will also provide
governments and the RTP/SCS.
opportunities for a stronger economy,
healthier environment, and safer quality of
This RTP/SCS supports an improved quality
life for all of Kern's diverse communities.
of life for our residents by providing more
choices for where they will live, work, and
This RTP/SCS seeks to: improve economic
play, and how they will move around. The
vitality, air quality, community health, safe, secure, and efficient transportation mobility and safety, while promoting the systems will provide improved access to conservation of natural resources and
opportunities, such as education, jobs and
undeveloped land, regional access to healthcare. Promoting bike and ped safety community services, increase energy
is one of many strategies being employed to
independence, and increase opportunities
achieve our vision (See Figures ES-4 & -5).
to help shape our community's future.
Figure ES-4: Active Transportation Program - Portable Mock City Bike Safety Training Kit Kern Council of Governments ES-5
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHALLENGES/SOLUTIONS (https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/pubs/i mpacts/). The induced jobs make up about
Solutions for the Economy and Air
1/3'd of the total jobs. The plan's $14 billion
Quality - Kern County continues to suffer
(see Chapter 5, Table 5-1), 24-year
from unemployment rates that are nearly
investment plan is projected to add 64,740
double State average. In 2020, Kern County
5-year job positions, increasing Kern's
sank to the 2nd worst poverty rate after tiny
economic base, adding capacity to re-
Del Norte County at the northwest corner of
invest in an ever more efficient/cleaner
the state, while the rest of the state has
transportation system, triggering an upward
been recovering from the great recession
economic spiral for future generations.
...every $1 billion spent on roadway
Since the 1990s, the Kern region has
infrastructure creates 13,000 job years achieved consistent improvements in the number of days exceeding federal
and pandemic, state policies to combat standards for ozone and particulate matter, climate change have slowed Kern's generally defined as "fine dust". In 2012, recovery. Those polices have curtailed Kern demonstrated attainment of the 1- groundwater pumping for agriculture, and hour ozone standard and has made new investment in oil production, two of significant progress on the 8-hour ozone Kern's primary economic sectors. and PM2.5 standards. Advancing emission reduction strategies helps our region to
The Federal Highway Administration make significant progress toward both estimates that every $1 billion spent on federal and state air emission goals. roadway infrastructure creates 13,000 job Strategies such as improving transit, bike, years while transit creates 40,000 job years walk, and housing options. For example, of employment. This value is generated by bike and ped projects are fully funded (see direct construction, indirect construction Figure ES-4 & -5). suppliers and induced jobs in retail,
services and other sectors that benefit from
more efficient goods movement
Figure ES-5: 90% of Project Mileage in 30-Year Bike & Pedestrian Complete Streets Plan Delivered in Just 15 Years
Kern Council of Governments ES-6
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Financial Challenges - Of all the which leveraged additional state and challenges facing us today, there is none federal grant funding totaling over $1B in more critical than funding. With the transportation infrastructure expenditures projected growth in population, in Kern. However, these funds are now employment and demand for travel, the nearly expended and there are no new costs of our multimodal transportation funding sources identified to replace these system surpass projected revenues one-time funds (see Figure ES-6). available from our historic transportation
The 2017 state gas tax increase known as
... federal gas tax revenues have failed SB 1, is a temporary solution to this to keep up with inflation. Additionally, problem. When adopted in 2017, estimates the increase in the number of electric were that by 2030 the tax on gasoline will diminish to the point that another
and hybrid vehicles that pay
transportation funding source will be
significantly less gas tax per mile... needed because of the number of electric cars on the road. In addition, the tax
funding source - the gas tax. Maintaining increase was estimated to only bring in half the local transportation infrastructure is of what was needed to bring our roadways up critical importance for the entire region and to good condition and being just enough to was ranked as the highest priority based on keep the road system from getting any public outreach. Funding from the federal worse. Thanks to the gas tax increase and gas tax has traditionally been used to heroic efforts of local jurisdictions and support the maintenance of these facilities. Caltrans, Kern continues to see the road Over time, however, federal gas tax pavement condition index hover between revenues have failed to keep up with 63 and 65 out of 100. A long-term, funding inflation. Additionally, the increase in the solution is needed. number of electric and hybrid vehicles that
pay significantly less gas tax per mile Most regions in the state have taken the traveled only exacerbates the problem. maintenance and improvement of their In 2005, Former Congressman Bill Thomas transportation systems into their own secured $720M in federal appropriations
Figure ES-6: 2024 Ribbon Cutting - SR 58 Centennial Connector Freeway Shaves-Off an Average of !2 Miles on Trips Between I-40 and the Northern San Joaquin Valley/Bay Area via 1-5 Kern Council of Governments ES-7
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
hands and have become "Self-Help" rapid transit (BRT), combined with Uber/Lyft counties, by passing a local ½ cent retail style, curb-to-curb, on-demand, last-mile, sales tax measure protected from state micro-transit are promising but need funds raids during economic downturns. The to implement/operate (See Figure ES-7).
State has also identified a special fund of
state gas tax revenue for regions that are PLANNING FOR GROWTH Self-Help. Kern is the largest county in the
Population, Housing, Employment &
Traffic Forecasts - Population in the 8,200
From 2019 to 2024 public transit
square mile County of Kern was estimated
services in Kern countywide saw a 47%
to be over 924,000 in January 2025. Growth
decrease in passengers
since the pandemic has been nearly flat at
1/3rd of one percent per year or about 3,000
state without a local sales tax for
people annually according to the California
transportation and misses out on $2 million Department of Finance. The Kern COG per year from this special fund, even though adopted 2022 RTP forecast, projects 10,460 our residents pay into it. people per year over the 24-year planning period. This equated to a total growth of 30
Furthermore, with recent declines in transit percent. The revised population growth ridership and fare revenue due to the
estimate shows only 11 percent resulting in
pandemic, the region's transit operators
a total population of 1,017,200 by 2049.
continue to face major obstacles to
This significant reduction has been driven
providing frequent and convenient transit
primarily by out-migration exceeding
services. Local and regional public transit
natural increase (births minus deaths).
is available within and between sixteen Recent trends show a large exodus of Kern County communities and has been
people leaving the major urban counties
experiencing challenges. From 2019 to and moving to more suburban counties like 2024 public transit services in Kern
countywide saw a 47% decrease in Riverside, or out of state. The Kern region remains California's eleventh most
passengers from 7.9 million to 4 million.
populated county ahead of San Francisco,
New services such as zero emission bus
but behind Fresno County.
Figure ES-7: Golden Empire Transit Now Operates 14 Hydrogen and more than 60 CNG Buses Hydrogen CNG
Kern Council of Governments ES-8
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
According to the California Employment seen truck traffic increase by 25% between Development Department. (EDD), the 2018 and 2023. Warehousing and unemployment rate is close to double the manufacturing square footage has doubled state rate reaching a high of 18.7% during since the pandemic, in part due to a the pandemic and is currently a little over moratorium on new warehousing in the 9% for January 2026. Kern's continued high Inland Empire counties in Southern unemployment rate is partially due to the California. That warehousing demand has spilled over into the San Joaquin Valley,
To help mitigate the increased trucking, driving increased truck traffic. a $100M trucking container depot and
To help mitigate the increased trucking, a
intermodal rail facility is under
$100M trucking container depot and
construction in Shafter. This is the only
intermodal rail facility is under construction
"BNSF Certified Site" in California in Shafter (See Figure ES-8). This is the only marketed by the class one railroad. "BNSF Certified Site" in California marketed by a class one railroad (bnsf-
slowdown in the oil and agriculture sectors. premier-one-sheet-shafter-ca.pdf). The facility has a shipping price from BNSF to
Much of Kern employment is dispersed, the ports of L.A./Long Beach and the such that, the Metropolitan Bakersfield Midwest that is competitive with trucking. area experiences a "reverse commute" Diverting these truck shipments to rail at whereby workers commute to outlying Shafter reduces road-wear, emissions, areas such as agricultural fields, food congestion and traffic incidents on I-5 and processing facilities, distribution/logistic 58 over the passes. Shipping by rail is 10 centers, wind farms, oil fields, prisons, times more energy efficient and 7 times less power plants, and military installations. polluting.
Regional Planning efforts such as the Kern
Goods Movement Increase - Kern has Area Regional Goods Movement noticed a significant increase in trucking Operations (KARGO) Community Prosperity since 2018. According to the California and Protection Study are identifying Traffic Census, I-5 over the Grapevine has strategies to mitigate the negative effects of Figure ES-8: April 2026 - 600 Plus Containers at Wonderful Company Shafter Container Depot Demonstrating Market for $100M Intermodal Rail Yard Under Construction on BNSF Main line
BEAREDN
CMA d
EYEROREEN
Kern Council of Governments ES-9
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
goods movement in the region while
enabling the economic benefits of high- PLANNING SUCCESSES tech jobs in resource processing,
manufacturing, and logistics. Updated on a 4-year cycle, here are a few Land Use Development - Land use is one notable sustainable community successes of the most important elements of effective from the implementation of past plans. transportation planning. Kern COG does Over 60 success stories are found in Appendix E.
...the equity analysis has demonstrated
Clean California Highway Murals - Using
that funds are being expended in a
local artists and themes several major
manner that benefits disadvantage
highway bridge ramps and underpasses
communities better or as well as all were decorated with beautiful murals communities countywide. through a grant from the Clean California Local Grant Program provided by Caltrans.
not have jurisdiction over land use (See Figure ES-9)
planning, but the agency does advise and
encourage dialogue among those involved Equity - Every RTP cycle since 1998 has in the decision-making process. The included an Integrated Environmental RTP/SCS and Regional RHNA were Justice Performance Measure Analysis (see developed in consultation with local Appendix D). Each cycle the equity jurisdictions and are consistent with analysis has demonstrated that funds are existing adopted general plans and zoning. being expended in a manner that benefits Kern COG will continue to use the disadvantage communities better or as well California Environmental Quality Act as all communities countywide. This is in (CEQA) and the National Environmental large part because of the grassroot public Policy Act (NEPA) to communicate with outreach effort that ensures that the Kern cities and the county on issues of land projects in the plan are supported by all use, transportation, and air quality to communities.
ensure that land use projects are
environmentally sound.
Figure ES-9: Clean California Local Grant Program - SR 204 Garces Circle Overpass Murals CLEAN
Kern Council of Governments ES-10
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Safety - Although safety has seen some effective strategy for reduction of commute challenges in recent years based on related traffic and emissions. performance measures, the Kern Region
has completed a joint update of safety Longest Class | Car-Free Bike Trail in plans for 9 jurisdictions in 2022, ensuring California - Started in 1976, Kern County has now completed the longest dedicated
77% of investments in this plan are for paved bike trail in the state extending 36.3 operations/maintenance, active miles from Lake Ming to Lake Webb along transportation, & transit projects. the banks of the Kern River. The paved bikeway is used by commuters and
recreational riders alike, promoting this
eligibility for Highway Safety Improvement plans sustainability and livability goals.
Program (HSIP) funds.
STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS
Telecommute Strategy - The Kern region
has continued its strong support for The RTP/SCS includes a forecast of telecommuting through its Commute Kern
reasonably available revenue over the next
program. As demonstrated during the
20-plus years at $15.7 billion (See Chapter
pandemic, over 35% of workers
6). This RTP promotes a more efficient
telecommuted up from 5% in prior years.
transportation system that calls for fully
Local statistically valid surveys indicate funding alternative transportation modes, that approximately 10% of all workers plan while emphasizing transportation demand to continue telecommuting after the
and transportation system management
pandemic, resulting in the single most approaches for new capacity. 77% of investments in this Plan are for operations/
Figure ES-10: Investments by Mode 2026-2049 ($ x 1,000) 77% for Operations/Maintenance, Transit & Active Transportation
Transit Capital,
4,179,600, 27%
Roads 0&M,
4,961,900, 32%
Transit 0&M,
1,496,300, 9%
Bike & Ped
Capital,
1,098,300, 7%
Roads Capital,
3,653,000, 23% Bike & Ped 0&M,
317,900, 2%
Kern Council of Governments ES-11
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
maintenance, active transportation, and
transit projects (See Figure ES-10). The SCS includes a Rural Urban Connectivity Strategy designed to ensure
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS that rural economic sectors-agriculture, energy, tourism, military, and others-are
The RTP fulfills multiple requirements with not left out of efforts to provide for a more one document: efficient transportation system.
• Congestion Management Program
• Sustainable Communities Strategy & To ensure consistency with the SCS, Kern Rural Urban Connectivity Strategy COG engaged in the RHNA process • Regional Housing Need Allocation concurrently with the development of the RTP. The RHNA is an 8-year document that
• Environmental Justice & Performance
provides low-income housing goals for
Measure Analysis
each community in the region.
• Safety-Security Action Element
Recognized as a state best practice, the
As the Congestion Management Agency,
Kern RTP includes an innovative analysis
Kern COG prepares the federally required
with the Integrated Performance Measures
Congestion Management Program (CMP)
Analysis for System Level, Smart Mobility
which is integrated into Chapter 5 of the
Framework, Health Equity, Environmental
RTP. Through the Kern Regional Traffic
Justice, and Title VI. The analysis includes
Count Program, Kern COG monitors Safety, and Ch. 5 includes the Safety- compliance with the congestion standards
Security Action Element.
set in the CMP. The Program includes an
innovative multi-model deficiency plan
RTP GOALS
policy that looks at ways to improve
mobility, such as HOV lanes to keep transit Figure ES-11 lists the 7 publicly vetted moving during peak congested periods. goals of the Regional Transportation Plan.
Note that since 2006, the number of
segments on the CMP system that were RTP SUMMARY HANDOUTS showing congestion deficiencies has
shrunk from 8 down to 1. This is primarily The following handouts summarize this due to the slower population growth RTP/SCS benefits and assumptions. discussed above.
Figure ES-11: Kern's 7 Long-Range Regional Transportation Planning Goals
1. Mobility - Improve the mobility of people and freight;
2. Accessibility - Improve accessibility to major employment and other regional activity centers;
3. Reliability - Improve the reliability and safety of the transportation system;
4. Efficiency - Maximize the efficiency of the existing and future transportation system;
5. Livability - Promote livable communities;
6. Sustainability - Minimize effects on the environment; and
7. Equity - Ensure equitable distribution of the benefits among various demographic & user groups.
Kern Council of Governments ES-12
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
The region represented by the Kern Council of Governments is projected to grow by more than 11% by 2049. To protect the quality of life for future generations, the 2026 RTP is presented as an economic development strategy as well as a transportation infrastructure and sustainability investment.
MOBILITY BENEFITS
The plan improves overall mobility and provides needed congestion relief by maintaining, fixing and finishing what we have
The plan fully funds maintenance of the transportation system while increasing funding for bike, pedestrian, and transit facilities
Implementation of the plan will nearly double the number of homes within walking distance to quality transit. By integrating land use and transportation, more than 70% OF BENEFITS of homes will be near quality transit compared to less than 60% under older plans.
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
/ The Federal Highway Administration estimates that every $1 billion spent on transportation infrastructure creates 13,000 job years of which 1/3 can persist long after construction, generated by increased labor from better mobility and more efficient goods movement.
This 24-year investment plan is projected to add over 64,740 5-year jobs) from construction, maintenance, and better mobility, and saves 21,000 additional existing jobs that would have been lost because of poor road conditions.
The plan could ultimately add about 21,6005-year permanent non-transportation sector jogs to the region, increasing Kern's economic base, adding capacity to re-invest in an ever more efficient transportation system, triggering an upward economic spiral for future generations.
HEALTH BENEFITS
Improve air quality and public health by reducing all criteria pollutants, emissions and their precursors to meet national standards - oxides of nitrogen (Nox), reactive organic gasses (ROG), particulate matter (PM10), fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and Carbon Monoxide (CO).
4% or more reduction in health expenditures because of improved air quality. • Promotes more active transportation by fully funding the Kern Active Transportation Plan and increasing funding for bike and pedestrian facilities by 700% over the 2011 RTP.
SUSTAINABILITY BENEFITS
/ 20% reduction in farmland converted to urban/built-up uses outside city spheres of influence.
15% reduction in household water use providing a full range of housing choices 3% reduction in infrastructure costs by revitalizing existing communities compared to past plans
Kern Council of Governments ES-13
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
Reflecting diverse public input, the plan assumes projects that reflect a more efficient transportation system that will benefit the mobility, economy, health and sustainability of the region. Consistent with the prior plan, funding from traditional sources continue at historic rates as well as a slight increase in additional funding from potential new sources. Funding assumptions are updated every four years. Land use assumptions are based on local general plans with input from the public and the regional planning advisory committee.
Transportation /
Projects
Planned bikeways
Carpool/ITS/ROW Projects
Near-Term Priority Regional
Projects
Long-Term Priority Regional
Projects
Next-In-Line Transportation
Projects (Unconstrained)
High Quality Transt Area (HQTA)
Quality Transit Area (QTA)
1 GET Service Micro Paratransit
PLANNING ASSUMPTION MAPS
Future
Land Use
Assumptions
Kern Councit
of Governments
PLACE TYPES
Strategie Employment
2000-7,500 Engroyees
A >1. 500 Employzes PLACE TYPES
verangi Predity
Resource and Other sversl
Passenget Rel Otations - 10 to 5.000 populaten
Bus Transe Caster - 50001 15 000 not
Inigated Farmland
Passerge Commut Rat
Puttiesources
Educaton Caster Federal Lands
Han DoNe Najer Roules
De High Spond Rail Algamarts respite 6d00 popula Ral Service Kern Council of Governments ES-14
2026 Regional Transportation Plan
TAFT-MARICOPA SUBAREA
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) 20+ Year Expenditure Program Summary By Major Expendature Maintenance/ Percent of YOE Cost (S)** Inflation Savings expenditures
categories with Forecast of Existing and Potential New Funding Sources (S)*. county-wide Fix-It-First, Keep-It-Local / Cost-Efficient-Roadway Safety, Maintenance, Operations 286,726,000 134,762,000 Advanced Tech, Safe, Clean Transportation-Transportation Control Measures (TCM) 73,539,900 14,824,400 Priority Regional Projects 1,097,300,000 81,700,000
Early Expenditures Subtotal 1,457,565,900 231,286,400 10.3% Next-In-Line Projects**** 33,819,840,000 5,603,500,000
Grand Total of All Projects Benefiting Subarea 35,277,405,900 5,834,786,400 53.3% Share of County Population: 2.1%
**Year of expenditure (YOE) 1) Assumes 3% annl. inflation, assumed extra funding allows delivery of projects 5 yrs. early resulting in inflation savings, 2) Prioritize preventative maint., lowers cost by est. 47% ***Active Transportation (bike & pedestrian) projects identified in the Kern COG Active Transportation Plan are fully funded and listed in table 5.1. ***Next-In-Line (unconstrained) projects include unfunded high speed rail segments in Kern totalling an estimated 530 Billion. Any potential new local funding sources/savings shall not be used for this project.
Next-in-Line (unconstrained) projects have no funding identified yet. However, if early expenditure projects in Table 5.1 are delivered early and under budget, these projects would be the next in line for funding.
Fix-It-First, Keep-It-Local / Cost-Efficient-Roadway Safety, Maintenance, Operations Roadway Safety, Maintenance and Operations
Sub Maintenance /
Areas* Jurisdiction(s) Project Scope YOE Cost (S)** Inflation Savings RTP Project ID Benefttd. (S)**.
Roadways, bridges (RR, canals, etc), safety widenings;
Taft - potential new funds Taft 10,785,000 5,069,000 KER26RTP001 rehab/reconstruct., signalization, bike/ped imprvmts, etc Taft - existing funds Various Locations Roadways, bridges (RR, canals, etc), safety widenings; 42,627,000 20,035,000 KER26RTP001 rehab/reconstruct, signalization, bike/ped imprumts, etc Maricopa - potential new funds Various Locations Roadways, bridges (RR, canals, etc), safety widenings; 1,555,000 731,000 KER26RTP001 rehab/reconstruct, signalization, bike/ped imprymts, etc Maricopa - existing funds Various Locations Roadways, bridges (RR, canals, etc, safety widenings; 6,145,000 2,888,000 KER26RTP001 rehab/reconstruct., signalization, bike/ped imprmts, etc County Areas - potential new Various Locations Roadways, bridges (RR, canals, etc), safety widenings; 16,712,000 7,855,000 KER26RTP001 funds rehab/reconstruct., signalization, bike/ped imprvmts, etc County Areas - existing funds Various Locations Roadways, bridges (RR, canals, etc), safety widenings; 66,054,000 31,045,000 KER26RTP001 rehab/reconstruct., signalization, bike/ped imprymts, etc State Highway Operations and Protection Program
State Highways - existing funds Various Locations (SHOPP) 142,848,000 67,139,000 KER26RTP001 *1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kern, 7) Southeast Kern, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Tehachapi 286,726,000 134,762,000 Sub-total **Year of expenditure (YOE) assumes 3% annual inflation. Additional funding assumed to allows delivery of projects 5 yrs. early resulting in inflation savings, and helps prioritize preventative maintenance, lowering cost by est. 47%. 2026 RTP Appendix C Taft-Maricopa - p. 1 of 8
TAFT-MARICOPA SUBAREA (Continued)
Advanced Tech, Safe, Clean Transportation--Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Transit, Passenger Rail, Low-Zero Emissions Infrastructure, Intellegent Transportation Systems (ITS) Sub
Areas* Jurisdiction(s) Project Scope YOE Cost ($** Inflation Savings RTP Project ID Benefttd. (S)**
1,2,3,4,5,6 Countywide Vanpooling Vanpooling, Park & Ride Lots 4,100,000 600,000 KER26RTP005 7,8.9
1,2,3,4,5,6 Countywide Bus Service Operations and Maintenance (incl. fare box, TDA, fed.) 6,580,000 - KER26RTP018 7,8,9
1,5,8 Bakersfield I-change at Panama Ln - HOV RM 4,500,000 618,300 KEROSR105 2036 1,5,8 Bakersfield SR 99 HOVIM Lanes, RM 1-change at SR 119 - HOV RM 4,500,000 618,300 KERO8RTP105 2036 5,8 Bakersfield SR 43 (future) HOV/M Lanes, RM WUC I-change at Ming Av - HOV RM 3,400,000 467,100 487100 KERBRTPA30 2086 KERO8RTP139 5,8 Bakersfield SR 43 (future) HOV/M Lanes, RM WUC I-change at White Ln - HOV RM 3,400,000 5,8 Bakersfield SR 43 (future) HOV/M Lanes, RM WUC I-change at SR 119 - HOV RM 3,400,000 467,100 KER0BRTP075 2036 1 234,58 Countywide Intellegent Transportation. Sys.(ITS) ITS related improvements / upgrades - Traffic Ops, etc. 70,000 - KER26RTP019 1,2,3,4,5,6 Countywide Aviation Capital, Maintenance and Operational Improvements 1,000,000 6,600,000 KER26RTP020 7,8,9
1,2,3,4,5,6 Countywide Other TCMs,-Alternative fuel/zero emission infrastructure, Various Locations 1,910,000 - KER26RTP025
,7,8,9 Promotion of alt. modes, alt. commuting, etc.
*1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kem, 7) Southeast Kern, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Tehachapi 32,860,000 9,837,900 Sub-total **Year of expenditure (YOE) assumes 3% annual inflation. Additional funding assumed to allows delivery of projects 5 years early resulting in an inflation savings. ***The largest portion of the Passenger Rail Program is funded through the CA High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) and like aviation and freight rail is included for information purposes only and beyond COG funding authority.
S3.OB in HR funding has been identified (fiscally constrained) for construction in the Kern region. An estimated $20 billion is unfunded for the ramaining segements in the Kern Region and can be found in Table 5.2. Continued delays in funding for the HSR project negate the possiblity of any inflation savings. 2026 RTP Appendix C Taft-Maricopa - p. 2 of 8
TAFT-MARICOPA SUBAREA (Continued)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Complete Streets Improvements and Maintenance Bikeway Facilities
Sub Inflation Savings
Areas* Jurisdiction(s) Project Scope YOE Cost (S)** RTP Project ID Start (S)**
Benefttd.
5,8 Bakersfield/County class I shared use path Buena Vista Rec Area Loop (Lk Buena Vista to Lk BV) 7.7 mi. 7,799,800 1,071,600 KER26RTP058 5,8 Bakersfield/County class I shared use path Tupman Path (Enos Ln to Moose St) 5.6 mi. 5,672,600 779,400 KER26RTPO75 County/Tupman class I shared use path Tule Elk Reserve (Tupman Path to Reserve St Pk) 1.3 mi. 1,316,800 180,900 KER26RTP081 Maricopa class I shared use path Wagy St (Maricopa Hwy to Welch St) .1 mi. 101,300 13,900 KER26RTP083 Maricopa class Il bike in Hazelton St (Main St to Poso St) .3 mi. 30,400 4,200 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Il bike In Main St (Hazelton St to California St) .1 mi. 10,100 1,400 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Il buffered bike in SR 166/33/Maricopa Hwy (Fresno St to Scott Dr) 1.1 mi. 222,900 30,600 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Il buffered bike In SR 33/California St (Poso St to Kern St) .5 mi. 101,300 13,900 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Ill bike bl Chico St (California St to Welch St). 1 mi. 5,600 800 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Ill bike bi Elkhorn St (SR 33 to Fresno St) .4 mi. 22,500 3,100 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Ill bike bl Fresno St (Poso St to Elkhorn St) .2 mi. 11,300 1,600 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Ill bike bl Green St (Hazelton St to California St) .1 mi. 5,600 800 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Ill bike bl Hazelton St (SR 166 to South City Limits) .3 mi. 16,900 2,300 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Ill bike bl Stanislaus St (Klipstein St to School St) .2 mi. 11,300 1,600 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Ill bike bi Union St (Maricopa Hwy SR 33 to Ruth St) .4 mi. 22,500 3,100 KER26RTP004 Maricopa class Ill bike bl Welch St (Chico St to Wagy St) .1 mi. 5,600 800 KER26RTP004 Maricopa/Caltrans class i bike in, Caltrans shidr SR 33/166 (Clark St to South City Limits) 1. mi. 90,000 - KER2XRTP000 | 2023 Taft class Il bike In SR 33 (Kern St to SR 119) .5 mi. 50,600 7,000 KER26RTP004 Taft class Il bike In SR 33 (West City Limits to Cascade PI) 1.2 mi. 121,600 16,700 KER26RTP004 Taft class il bike in 10th St (Center St to F St) 7 mi. 63,000 KER2XRTP000 2021 class Il bike in A St (Terrace Drto S 10th St) .9 mi. 81,000 - KER2XRTP000 2021 Taft class il bike in Ash St (N 10th St to Airport Rd) 1.9 mi. 171,000 KER2XRTP000 2021 class if bike In SR 119 (Midway Rd to South City Limits) 6.6 mi. 594,000 KER2XRTPO0O 2023 class Il bike in Wood St (S 10th St to SR 33) 1.1 mi. 99,000 - KER2XRTP000 2021 Taft class Il buffered bike in Cedar St (Division Rd to Airport Rd) 2.1 mi. 425,400 58,400 KER26RTP004 Taft class Il buffered bike in SR 33 Kern St (Cascade Pl to 1st St) 1.2 mi. 243,100 33,400 KER26RTP004 class Il buffered bike In 1st St (West Side Hwy SR 33 to Calvin St) .3 mi. 54,000 - KER2XRTP000 2021 -
co Taft class Il buffered bike In 2nd St (Calvin St to Williams Wy) .3 mi. 54,000 KER2XRTP000 2021฿ Taft class Il buffered bike In 6th St (Oak St to Ash St) 1.1 mi. 198,000 KER2xRTP000 2021 Taft class Ill bike bl Airport Rd (Ash St to SR 119) 1.1 mi. 55,000 - KER2XRTP000 2021 Taft class Ill bike bl Cadet Rd (SR 33 to Duval Rd) 2. mi. 112,600 15,500 KER26RTP004 co Taft class Ill bike bi Church St (F St to Ranier Av) .9 mi. 45,000 - KER2XRTP000 2021 Taft class Ill bike bl Gardner Field Rd (SR 33 to East City Limits) 4.2 mi. 236,400 32,500 KER26RTP004 Taft class Ill bike bl Midoil Rd (Thomas St to Terrace Dr) .7 mi. 35,000 - KER2XRTP000 2021 2026 RTP Appendix C Taft-Maricopa - p. 3 of 8
Taft class Ill bike bl SR 33 (Cadet Rd to California St) 2.3 mi. 129,400 17,800 KER26RTP004 Taft class Ill bike bi 2nd St (Calvin St to Supply Row) .6 mi. 30,000 KER2XRTP000 2021 Taft class ill bike bi Harding Av (A St to E St) .4 mi. 20,000 KER2XRTP000 2021 Taft class Ill bike bi Oak St (Lierly Av to S 10th St) .2 mi. 10,000 KER2XRTP000 2021 Taft class IV cycle track 10th St (Center St to Ash St) .6 mi. 180,000 KER2XRTP000 202 Taft/County class | Gardner Field Rd (County to Aqueduct) 1.0 mi. 1,013,000 139,200 KER26RTP026 Taft/County class I shared use path Kern R. Pkwy (Western end of Path to L Buena Vista) 2.9 mi. 2,610,000 KER26RTP090 2023 Taft/County class I shared use path Tart Path (Kern River Parkway to Gardner Field Ra) 10.6 ml. 10,737,400 1,475,200 KER26RTP091 Taft/County class Il bike in A St (Arroyo Dr to Hilard St) 0.3 mi. 30,400 4,200 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class Il bike In Ash St (Emmons Park to Harrison St) 0.2 mi. 20,300 2,800 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class Il bike in Asher Av (Supply Row to South St) 0.5 mi. 50,600 7,000 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class ll bike In Cedar St (Division Rd to Tyler St) 0.4 mi. 40,500 5,600 KER26RTP004 Taft County class Il bike In Cedar St (Harrison St to Airport Rd 1.6 mi. 162,100 22,300 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class Il bike In Division Ra (Grevillea St to Ash St) 0.7 mi. 70,900 9,700 KER26RTP004 Taf/County class ll bike In E Ash St (Adams St to Airport Rd) 0.9 mi. 91,200 12,500 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class Il bike in E St (Harding Av to 10th St) 0.6 mi. 60,800 8,400 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class Il bike In Elm St (Division Rd to Harrison St) 0.5 mi. 50,600 7,000 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class Il bike In Gardner Field Rd (County to Aqueduct) 0.5 mi. 50,600 7,000 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class Il bike In General Petroleum (2nd St to Wood St) 0.4 mi. 40,500 5,600 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class Il bike In Grevillea St (Division Rd to Harrison St) 0.5 mi. 50,600 7,000 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class Il bike In Harding Av (A St to ESt) 0.2 mi. 20,300 2,800 KER26RTP004 TaftCounty class Il bike In Olive Av (Supply Row to Wood St) 0.3 mi. 30,400 4,200 KER26RTP004 Taft/County class Il bike In Pico St (S 6th St to Asher Wy) 0.1 mi. 10,100 1,400 KER26RTP004 1,2,3,4,5,6 Countywide Various locations Construct Class I, Il or Ill Bike Path; striping; signage 100,000 13,700 KER26RTP004 17,8,9
*1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kern, 7) Southeast Kem, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Tehachapi 33,694,900 4,026,900 Sub-total **Year of expenditure (YOE) assumes 3% annual inflation. Additional funding assumed to allows delivery of projects 5 years early resulting in an inflation savings. 2026 RTP Appendix C Taft-Maricopa - p. 4 of 8
Bicycle and Pedestrian Complete Streets Improvements and Maintenance Pedestrian Facilities
Seas Jurisdictionte) YOE Cost (S) Inflation Savings RTP Project ID Start Project Scope
Benefttd.
Maricopa Complete Streets/ITS Improvements Other future developments funded by mitigation, fees, etc. 203,300 27,900 KER26RTP025 Maricopa Sidewalk Improvement Stanislaus St (School St to Klipstein St) .2 mi. 48,400 6,600 KER26RTPO25 Maricopa/Caltrans Corridor Improvement California St (Main St to Poso St) .4 mi. 130,000 17,900 KER26RTP025 Maricopa/Caltrans Corridor Improvement Klipstein St (Fiester St to Stanislaus St) .4 mi. 129,100 17,700 KER26RTPO25 ∞ Maricopa/Caltrans Sidewalk Improvement Poso St (Stanislaus St to S Kern St) .2 mi. 38,300 5,300 KER26RTP025 Taft Complete Streets/ITS Improvements Other future developments funded by mitigation, fees, etc. 3,684,800 506,300 KER26RTP025 Taft Corridor Improvement 10th St (Ash St to Main St) .6 mi. 198,100 27,200 KER26RTP025 Taft Corridor Improvement 6th St (Ash St to Main St) .8 mi. 246,700 33,900 KER26RTP025 Corridor Improvement San Emidio St (N 10th St to 1st St) .8 mi. 76,600 10,500 KER26RTP025 High-Visibility Crosswalk Kern St (6th St) 12,600 1,700 KER26RTP025 Taft Sidewalk Improvement Ash St (10th Street to 4th St) .7 mi. 153,300 21,100 KER26RTPO25 Taft Sidewalk Improvement Olive Av (Supply Row to South St) .5 mi. 104,000 14,300 KER26RTP025 Sidewalk Improvement Wood St (S 10th St to SR 33) 1.1 mi. 236,900 32,500 KER26RTP025 Taft/Caltrans Corridor Improvement Kern Av (Cascade Pi to Taft Hwy) 1.2 mi. 379,700 52,200 KER26RTP025 Taft/Caltrans High-Visibility Crosswalk SR 119 (Gardner Field Rd/E Main St) 12,600 1,700 KER26RTP025 Taf/County Ker - Complete Streets/ITS Improven Other future developments funded by mitigation, fees, etc. 791,900 108,300 KER26RTP025 Taft/County Sidewalk improvement Cedar St (Lincoln Street to SR 119) 1. mi. 209,900 28,300 KER26RTP025 Taft/County Sidewalk Improvement Date St (Division Rd to Monroe St) .7 mi. 154,000 21,200 KER26RTP025 Taft/County Sidewalk Improvement Elm St (Lincoln Street to Harrison St) .5 mi. 106,600 14,600 KER26RTP025 Taft/County Sidewalk Improvement S 10th St (A Street to Buena Vista Place). 3 mi. 68,200 9,400 KER26RTP025 1,2,3,4,5,6 Countywide 7,8,9 Various locations Safe, Complete Streets, Pedestrian Enhancements - KER26RTP025 T,23,4.5,6 Countywide Various locations Construct Complete Streets Improvements - KER26RTP025 7,8,9
*1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kern, 7) Southeast Kem, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Tehachapi 6,985,000 959,600 Sub-total *Year of expenditure (YOE) assumes 3% annual inflation. Additional funding assumed to allows delivery of projects 5 years early resulting in an inflation savings. 2026 RTP Appendix C Taft-Maricopa - p. 5 of 8
TAFT-MARICOPA SUBAREA (Continued)
Priority Regional Projects
Freight Rail***
Sub Inflation Savings
Areas* Jurisdictions) Project Scope YOE Cost (S) RTP Project ID Start Beneftta. (S)"
1,2,3,5,6,1 County/Tehachapi Freight Rail Double-track sections (Bakersfield to Mojave) - Phase 2 101,300,000 13,900,000 KER26RTP086 ,8,9
1,5,6,8 Shafter/Bakersfield Freight Rail Intermodal Rail Facility - Phase 3 100,000,000 KER2600087 1,2,3,4,5,6 Countywide Private Sector Rail Network Improvments, supporting rail 7,8,9 Freight Rail freight movement 56,300,000 7,700,000 KER26RTP089 *1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kern, 7) Southeast Ker, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Teachapi 257,600,000 21,600,000 " Sub-total **Year of expenditure (YOE) assumes 3% annual inflation. Additional funding assumed to allows delivery of projects 5 years early resulting in an inflation savings. ***Freight rail projects are usually privately funded however some competetive government grant funding is available.
Priority Regional Projects
2026-2029 Major Roadway Improvements
Sub
Areas* Jurisdiction(s) Project Scope YOE Cost (S) Inflation Savings RTP Project ID Start Beneftta. (S)**
1,5,6,7,8,9 Bakersfield Centennial Corridor At Rte 99 & 58 - operational improvements 84,000,000 KER22RTP003 2026 Stockdale Hwy (SR 43 to Heath Rd) safety widening, traffic 1,5,6,7,8,9 County Centennial Corridor 66,400,000 - KER22RTP005 2026 flow impumts.
1,2,3,4,5,6 County/Keene W of Tehachapi to General Beale Rd - new truck climbing Route 58 140,000,000 2026
,7,8.9 lanes
Intermodal Rail Freight Hub Connector Improvements -
1,5,6,8 Shafter Cherry Av 111,100,000 - KER23RTP001 2027 Phase I - Shafter Greenpass (KARGO 13.9)
5,8 County/Taft Route 119 Cherry Ave to Elk Hills Rd - safety widening, traffic flow 117,400,000 16,100,000 KERO8RTP022 impvmts. (Ph. 1 bypass) 2031
5,8 County/Bakersfield Route 119 1-5 to Buena Vista - safety widening, traffic flow improvements 35,200,000 4,800,000 KERO8RTP099 2036 5,6,8 County/Bakersfield West Urban Corridor White Lane to Westside Pkwy-construct new facility 130,300,000 17,900,000 KEROBRTP139 2049 5,6,8 County/Bakersfield West Urban Corridor Taft Hwy to White Lane - construct new facility 101,300,000 13,900,000 KER08RTP097 2049 Taft Route 119 Elk Hills - County Rd to Tupman Ave - safety widening, traffic KERO8RTP086 flow impumts. (Ph. 2) 54,000,000 7,400,000 2049
*1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kern, 7) Southeast Kem, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Tehachapi 839,700,000 60,100,000 Sub-total **Year of expenditure (YOE) assumes 3% annual inflation. Aditional funding assumed to allows delivery of projects 5 years early resulting in an inflation savings.
TAFT-MARICOPA SUBAREA (Continued)
Regional Projects Under Construction / Recently Completed - 2025 Status Areas* Jurisdiction(s) Project Scope YOE Cost (S) Savings (s)** RTP Project ID Start Benefted.
1,5,6,7,8,9 Bakersfield Route 58 i-5 to 58/Cottonwood Rd - new freeway/operatational Improver 698,000,000 KER08RTP020 2016 1,5.6,7,8,9 Bakersfield Passenger Rail Amtrak Station - Phase 3 13,000,000 KER2XRTP000 2022 *1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kem, 7) Southeast Kem, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Teachapi 711,000,000 2026 RTP Appendix C Taft-Maricopa - p. 6 of 8
Fix-It-First, Keep-It-Local / Cost-Efficient-Roadway Safety, Maintenance, Operations Next-In-Line - Local Streets and Roads (Unconstrained Projects) Sub Maintenance
Areas Jurisdiction(s) Project Scope YOE Cost (S)** RTP Project ID Benefttd. Savings (S)**
1,2,3,4,5,8 Region Various Locations Roadways, bridges (RR, canals, etc), safety widenings; 698,400,000 328,200,000 KER26RTP001 ,7,8,9 rehab/reconstruct, signalization, bike/ped imprymts, etc *1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kern, 7) Southeast Kern, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Tehachapi 698,400,000 328,200,000 Sub-total **Year of expenditure (YOE) assumes 3% annual inflation. Additional funding assumed to allows delivery of projects 5yrs. early resulting in inflation savings, and helps prinitize preventative maintenance, lowering cost by est. 47%.
TABLE 5.2 - Beyond 2049 - Next-In-Line Projects (Unconstrained Program of Projects) (Continued) Advanced Tech, Safe, Clean Transportation-Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Next-In-Line - Transit, Passenger Rail, Aviation (Unconstrained Projects) Sub
Areas Jurisdictions) Project Scope YOE Cost ($)** Maint./Inflation RTP Project ID Benefttd. Savings (S)*
1,2,3,4,5,6 Kern County, Bakersfield, Northwest of Bakersfield to Palmdale connecting to Palmdale High Speed Rail 30,000,000,000 4,778,100,000 KER26RTP113 .7,8,9 Tehachapi Metrolink Station
6.8 County Buttonwillow Airport Capital Improvements - KER26RTP117 1,2,4,5,6,8 County, Bksfld Meadows Field (BFL) Capital Improvements 54,600,000 8,700,000 KER26RTP121 1,2,4,5,6,8 County, Bksfld Meadows Field (BFL) Meadows Field Air Freight Terminal 75,020,000 11,900,000 KER26RTP122 KER26RTP126
*1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kem, 7) Southeast Kem, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Tehachapi 30,131,670,000 4,799,000,000 Sub-total **Year of expenditure (YOE) assumes 3% annuall inflation. Additional funding assumed to allows delivery of projects 5yrs. early resulting in inflation savings, and helps prioritize preventative maintenance, lowering cost by est. 47%.
TABLE 5.2 - Beyond 2049 - Next-In-Line Projects (Unconstrained Program of Projects) (Continued) Next-In-Line - Active Transportation (Unconstrained Projects) Sub
Areas* Jurisdiction(s) Project Scope YOE Cost (S)** Maint./Inflation RTP Project ID Benefttd. Savings (S)**
1,2,3,4,5,6 all The intent of this plan is to fully fund bike and pedestrian projects as identified in the most recent active transportation plan. For 7,8,9 a complete listing of projects see Table 5.1.
Sub-total $O SO Sub-total
TABLE 5.2 - Beyond 2049 - Next-In-Line Projects (Unconstrained Program of Projects) (Continued) Next-In-Line - Freight rail (Unconstrained Projects)
Sub
Areas Jurisdictions) Project Scope YOE Cost (S)** Maint./Inflation RTP Project ID Benefttd. Savings (S)**
County Intermodal hub Sunset Line Intermodal Rail Facilities 20,000,000 3,200,000 KER27RTP138 *1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kern, 7) Southeast Ker, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Tehachapi 20,000,000 3,200,000 Sub-total **Year of expenditure (YE) assumes 3% annual inflation. Additional funding assumed to allows delivery of projects 5 yrs. early resulting in inflation savings, and helps prioritize preventative maintenance, lowering cost by est. 47%. 2026 RTP Appendix C Taft-Maricopa - p. 7 of 8
TABLE 5.2 - Beyond 2049 - Next-In-Line Projects (Unconstrained Program of Projects) (Continued) Next-In-Line - Major Roadway Improvements (Unconstrained Projects) Sub Maint./Inflation
Areas Jurisdiction(s) Project Scope YOE Cost (S)** RTP Project ID Benefttd. Savings (s)**
1,5,8,9 Bakersfield Route 58 New 58 from I-5 to Heath Rd at Stockdale Hwy - construct new 500,000,000 79,600,000 KERO8RTP114 1,5,8,9 Bakersfield Southern Urban Corridor 1-5 to Rt 58 - new tacility 610,000,000 97,200,000 KER08RTP074 1,2,8 County Copus Rd Copus Rd Safety Realignment (KARGO 1.4) 19,150,000 3,100,000 KER26RTP168 1,2,8 County Future Route 166 Arvin Greenpass Corr. Copus/David Rd; I-5 to Wheeler Rage I 104,000,000 16,600,000 KER26RTP167 1,2,8 County Future Route 166 Realign SR 166 to Copus Rd via Old River Rd (KARGO 1.5) 45,000,000 7,200,000 KER26RTP169 1,2,5,6,8 County Interstate 5 Grapevine southbound weigh station relocation (KARGO 4.1) 100,000,000 15,900,000 KER18RTP004 1,2,5,8 County Interstate 5 Southbound truck weigh station new location - Tejon Pass 66,600,000 10,600,000 KER26RTP150 1,5,6,7,8,9 County Route 58 Route 223 new interchange (KARGO 2.3) 244,000,000 38,900,000 KER26RTP155 1,5,6,7,8,9 County Route 58 Cultural Biological interpretive Visitors Center (KARGO 2.4) 17,550,000 2,800,000 KER26RTP156 1,5,8,9 County/Bkfd Route 58 I-5/Rt 58 Stockdale Hwy I-change improvements (KARGO 10.2 9,650,000 1,500,000 KER26RTP152 1,5,8,9 County/Bkfd Route 58 SR 58 Stockdale Hwy Safety Passing Lanes (KARGO 10.3) 66,500,000 10,600,000 KER26RTP153 1,2,5,8 County/Grapevine Interstate 5 Grapevine interchange - construct new interchange / relocate 76,000,000 12,100,000 KER18RTP004 1,2,5,6,8 County/Lebec Interstate 5 Grapevine to Lebec - truck passing lanes - habitat crossings (F 257,800,000 41,100,000 KERO3RTP027 1,5,6,7,8,9 County/Tehachapi Route 58 W of Teh. to Gen Beale Rd - truck climb/safety passing lanes 36,600,000 KEROBRTPO35 seg 1 (KARGO 2.1) 230,000,000
W of Teh. to Gen Beale Rd - truck climb/safety passing lanes 1,5,6,7,8,9 County/Tehachapi Route 58 seg 3 (KARGO 2.2) 301,000,000 47,900,000 KER26RTP154 Maricopa Route 166 Basic School Rd - reconstruct intersection grade 520,000 100,000 KERO8RTP043 Maricopa Route 33 Welch St to Midway Rd - widen to four lanes 88,000,000 14,000,000 KER08RTP029 Maricopa/Taft Route 33 Safety improvements, extend existing passing lanes S. of Taft, 20,000,000 3,200,000 KER26RTP151 5,6,8 South metro West Urban Corridor Taft Hwy to I-5 - extend facility 100,000,000 15,900,000 KERO8RTP075 Taft Route 119 Rt 33 to Cherry Ave - safety widening 54,000,000 8,600,000 KER08RTP040 Route 119 Tupman Rd to I-5 - safety widening 60,000,000 9,600,000 KERO8RTP041 1) Arvin-Lamont, 2) Frazier Park, 3) Indian Wells Valley, 4) Lake Isabella, 5) Metro Bakersfield, 6) North Kem, 7) Southeast Ker, 8) Taft-Maricopa, 9) Tehachapi 2,969,770,000 473,100,000 Sub-total **Year of expenditure (YOE) assumes 3% annual inflation. Additional funding assumed to allows delivery of projects 5yrs. early resulting in inflation savings, and helps prioritize preventative maintenance, lowering cost by est. 47%. 2026 RTP Appendix C Taft-Maricopa - p. 8 of 8
AGENDA ITEM
TITLE: ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARICOPA ADDING CHAPTER 15.28 TO THE CITY OF MARICOPA MUNICIPAL CODE BY
SETTING FORTH AN EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65850.7.
PROPOSED BY: City Attorney Alan Peake
MEETING DATE: MAY 12, 2026
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARICOPA ADDING CHAPTER 15.28 TO THE CITY OF MARICOPA
MUNICIPAL CODE BY SETTING FORTH AN EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING
PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65850.7.
BACKGROUND
At the regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, April 28, 2026, the Council introduced a proposed ordinance entitled An Ordinance of The City Council of The City of Maricopa Adding Chapter 15.28 To the City Of Maricopa Municipal Code by Setting Forth an Expedited, Streamlined Permitting Process for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations as Required by Government Code Section Following the Staff Report, the Council adopted two motions, these being:
1) a motion to waive reading of an ordinance entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARICOPA ADDING CHAPTER 15.28 TO THE CITY OF
MARICOPA MUNICIPAL CODE BY SETTING FORTH AN EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED
PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65850.7."
2) a motion to introduce an ordinance entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARICOPA ADDING CHAPTER 15.28 TO THE CITY OF
MARICOPA MUNICIPAL CODE BY SETTING FORTH AN EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED
PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65850.7."
Should Council now wish to adopt the ordinance in question, it is appropriate to favorably consider a motion to adopt an ordinance entitled, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARICOPA ADDING CHAPTER 15.28 TO THE CITY OF MARICOPA MUNICIPAL CODE BY
SETTING FORTH AN EXPEDITED, STREAMLINED PERMITTING PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65850.7."
ORDINANCE NUMBER
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARICOPA@ ADDING CHAPTER 15.28 TO THE CITY OF MARICOPA MUNICIPAL CODE
BY SETTING FORTH AN EXPEDITED, STREAIILINED PERITTING
PROCESS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS AS
REQUIRED BY GOVERNIIENT CODE SECTION 65850.7.
WHEREAS, the State of California and the City of Maricopa has consistently promoted and encouraged the use of fuel-efficient electric vehicles; and WHEREAS, the State of California adopted Assembly Bill 1236, which requires local agencies to adopt an ordinance that creates an expedited and streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging systems; and
WHEREAS, creation of an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations would facilitate convenient charging of electric vehicles.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARICOPA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. TITLE, WORDS AND PHRASES
This Ordinance shall be known as the City of Maricopa Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permit Expediting Ordinance.
SECTION 2.
Chapter 15.28 of the City of Maricopa Municipal Code is hereby added as set forth in Exhibit A
SECTION 3.
Any Provision of the City of Maricopa Municipal Code or appendices thereto, inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such consistencies and no further, are hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance.
Exhibit A
Chapter 15.28
Electric Vehicle Charging Systems
15.28.010 DEFINITIONS:
ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION OR CHARGING STATION: Means any level of electric vehicle supply equipment station that is deigned and built in compliance with article 625 of the California Electrical Code and delivers electricity from a source outside an electric vehicle into a plug-in vehicle
ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL: Means the utilization of one or more or either electronic mail, the internet, or facsimile.
FEASIBLE METHOD TO SATISFACTORIY MITIGATE OR AVOID THE SPECIFIC ADVERSE IMPACT:
Includes, but is not limited to, any cost-affective method, condition or mitigation imposed by the City on another similarly situated application in a prior successful application for a similar permit.
SPECIFIC ADVERSE IMPACT: Means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objection, identified, and written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.
15.28.020 PURPOSE:
The Purpose of this Chapter is to promote and encourage the use of electric vehicles by creating an expedited, streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations while promoting public health and safety and preventing specific adverse impacts in the installation and use of such charging stations.
15.28.30 APPLICABILITY:
This chapter applies to the permitting of all electric vehicle charging systems in the City. Electric vehicle charging systems legally established or permitted prior to the effective date of this chapter are not subject to the requirements of this chapter unless physical modifications or alterations ae undertaken that materially change the size, type, or components of an electric vehicle charging systems in such a way as to require new permitting. Routine operation and maintenance or like-kind replacements shall not require a permit.
15.28.040 ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS:
A. All electric vehicle charging systems shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code, the Society of Automotive engineers, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories, and rules of the Public Utilities Commission regarding safety and reliability.
B. Installation of electric vehicle charging station shall be incorporated into the load calculations of new or existing electrical services and shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code. Electric vehicle charging equipment shall be considered a continuous load.
C. Anchorge of either floor-mounted or wall-mounted electric vehicle charging stations shall meet the requirements of the California Building or Residential code as applicable per occupancy, and the provision of the manufacturer's installation instructions. Mounting of charging stations shall not adversely affect building elements.
15.28.050 DUTIES OF THE CITY'S CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL:
A. All documents required for submission of an electric vehicle charging system application shall be made publicly available on the City's website.
B. By resolution, the City Council shall adopt a checklist of all requirements with which electric vehicle charging systems shall comply to be eligible for expedited review.
C. The electric vehicle charging system permit process and checklist shall substantially confirm to recommendations contained in the most current version of the Plug-In Electric Vehicle infrastructure Permitting Checklist contained in the Zero-Emission Vehicles in California:
Community Readiness Guidebook adopted by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research.
D. The Chief building official shall allow electronic submittal of the electric vehicle charging station application.
15.28.060 PERMIT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
A. Review of the permit application shall be limited to the chief building officials review of whether the application meets local, State and Federl health and safety requirements. The application shall be administratively reviewed by the chief building official as a nondiscretionary permit.
B. The City shall not condition approval of an application on the approval of an association, as that term is defined by Civil Code section 4080.
C. An application for an electric vehicle charging station shall be deemed complete and the permit available for issuance, when the chief building official determines that the application satisfies all the requirements found in the checklist.
D. If and application is deemed incomplete, a written plan check correction notice will be available to the applicant with in ten (10) working days, detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information or documentation required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance shall be given to the applicant for resubmission.