Agenda — Marina City Council, January 18, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

AGENDA
Wednesday, January 18, 2023 5:00 P.M. Closed Session
6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR

AGENCY OF THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND MARINA

GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY
Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556 In accordance with California Government Code §54953(e)(1)(A) and (C) and the Proclamation of a State of Emergency issued by Governor Newsom on March 4, 2020, under the provisions of Government Code §8625 related to the COVID -19 (coronavirus) pandemic, consistent with recommendations by State and local health officials regarding social distancing and in order to prevent an imminent risk to the health and safety of attendees as determined in Resolution 2023-123, public participation in City of Marina City Council public meetings shall be electronic only and without a physical location for public participation until the earlier of May 31, 2023, or such time as the City Council may adopt a resolution in a ccordance with Government Code §54953(e)(3). This meeting is being broadcast “live” on Access Media Productions (AMP) Community Television Cable 25 and on the City of Marina Channel and on the internet at https://accessmediaproductions.org/

PARTICIPATION
You may participate in the City Council meeting in real -time by calling Zoom Meeting via the weblink and phone number provided at the top of t his agenda. Instructions on how to access, view and partici pate in remote meetings are provided by visiting the City’s home page at https://cityofmarina.org/. Attendees can make oral comments during the meeting by using the “Raise Your Hand” feature in the webinar or by pr essing *9 on your telephone keypad if joining by phone only.

The most effective method of communication with the City Council is by sending an email to [email protected] Comments will be reviewed and distributed before the meeting if received by 5:00 p.m . on the day of the meeting. All comments received will become part of the record.

Council will have the option to modify their action on items based on comments received.

AGENDA MATERIALS
Agenda materials, staff reports and background information r elated to regular agenda items are available on the City of Marina’s website www.cityofmarina.org. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet wil l be made available on the City of Marina website www.cityofmarina.org subject to City staff’s abi lity to post the documents before the meeting

AMENDED AGENDA PACKET
Agenda for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, January 18, 2023 Page 2

VISION STATEMENT
Marina will grow and mature from a small town bedro om community to a small city which is diversified, vibrant and through positive relationships with regional agencies, self -sufficient. The City will develop in a way that insulates it f rom the negative impacts of urban sprawl to become a desirable residential and business community in a natural setting. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

MISSION STATEMENT
The City Council will provide th e leadership in protecting Marina’s natural setting while developing the City in a way that provides a balance of housing, jobs and business opportunities that will result in a community characterized by a desirable quality of life, including recreation an d cultural opportunities, a safe environment and an economic viability that supports a high level of municipal services and infrastructure. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The City recognizes that it was founded and is built upon the traditional homelands and villages first inhabited by the Indigenous Peoples of this region - the Esselen and their ancestors and allies - and honors these members of the community, both past and present.

1. CALL TO ORDER

Liesbeth Visscher , Brian McCarthy , Kathy Biala , Mayor Pro -Tem/Vice Chair Cristina Medina Dirksen, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS:

4. CLOSED SESSION:
b. Real Property Negotiation (Govt. Code Section 54956.8) i. Property: Light and Motion, 711 Neeson Road, Building 535 (APN: 031-112-025) Negotiating Party: Daniel Emerson
Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
c. Real Property Negotiation (Govt. Code Section 54956.8) ii. Property: City of Marina Corporation Yard, 2660 5th Avenue, Marina, CA Negotiating Party: Remleh Scherzinger, Marina Coast Water District Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms

6:30 PM - RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPOR T ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN

CLOSED SESSION

5. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: None

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, January 18, 2023 Page 3

7. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS:

8. PUBLIC COMMENT: Any member of the public may comment on any matter within the City Council’s jurisd iction that is no t on the agenda. This is the appro priate place to comment on items on the Consent Age nda. Action will not be taken on items not on th e agenda. Comments are limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. General public comment may be limited to thirty (30) minutes and/or continued to the end of the agenda. Any member of the public may comment on any matter listed on this agenda at the time the matter is being considered by the City Council . Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the C ouncil in advanc e of the meeting, to pro vide adequate time for its consideration.

9. CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE SUCCE SSOR AGENCY TO THE FORME R MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Background information has been provided to the Successor Agency of the f ormer Redevelopment Agency on all matters listed under th e Consent Agenda, and these items are considered to be routine and non -controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda are normally approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any m ember of the public or City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a len gthy explanation is required, the Council may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. If an i tem is pulled for discussion, it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency.

10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and non-controversial.

All items under the Consent Agenda may be approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, a ny member of City Council may ask a quest ion or make a comment ab out an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, Council may remove the item from the Consent Agenda and it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items.
a. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Accounts Payable Check Numbers 101400-101589, totaling $2,646,971.02 b. MINUTES: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) December 20, 2022, Regular City Council Meeting
c. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: None
d. AWARD OF BID: None
e. CALL FOR BIDS: None
f. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolutio n No. 202 3-, regarding the Ralph M. Brown A ct (California Government Code §§54950-54963, making certain findings; and authorizing t he city to continue to i mplement r emote teleconferenced public meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies for the period January 20, 2023, through February 18, 2023. (2) Adopting Resolution No. 2023-, authorize the City Manager to apply for the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Grant as administered by the State Department of Housing and Community
Development (State HCD). and to authorize the finance director to make appropriate budgetary amendments to budget.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, January 18, 2023 Page 4

(3) Adopting Resolution No. 2023-, authorizing the changing of the name of the “ Designated Avenue of Landmark Trees 1996” signs along Beach Road to now read “Mike Owen Avenue of Landmark Trees 1996”. (4) Adopting Resolution No. 2023 -, approving consent to the City o f Monterey to renew the Monterey County Tourism Improvemen t District (MCTID) and include the City of Marina in the MCTID.
(5) Adopting Resolut ion No. 2023-, a pproving the allocation of an Administrative Analyst II position at the Marina Municipal Airport; and, authorizing the City Manager to make necessary adjustments to the City’s classification and compensation plan.
(6) Adopting Resolution No. 2023 -, approving a Financial Analyst classification and salary schedule; and, authorizing the City Manager to make necessary adjustments to the City’s classification and compensation plans.
g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: None
i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE): None
k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS: None
l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING):
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS:
(1) Appointing to Pl anning Commission: Glenn Woodson, Surinder Rana, Hyunsoo Hur and Victor Jacobsen. 4-seats expiring February 2025

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS: In the Council’s discretion, the applicant/proponent of an item may be given up to ten (10) minutes to speak. All other persons may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak on the matter.
a. Open a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinanc e establishing an affordable ho using overlay, a m itigated negative declaration and a corresponding general plan amendment.
b. Amending Title 17 (Zoning Ordina nce) of the Marina Municipal Code and add Section 2.37.1 to the General Plan i n response to Senate Bill 478. This state law encourages the adoption of policies that support missing middle housing projects. The proposed amendments are exempt from CEQA per Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
c. Amending Marina Municipal Code ( MMC) Chapter 5.32 (C ardrooms) to modify the criteria for the transfer of cardroom permits pursuant to MMC

5.32.090 and to amend MMC Sections 5.32.102 to remove the moratorium on new cardroom permits and 5.32.106 to clarify no more than two cardroom permits. The proposed amend ments are exempt from environmental review per Section 15060(c)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, January 18, 2023 Page 5

12. OTHER ACTIONS ITEMS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY : Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The Successor Agency may, at its discretion, take a ction on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

13. OTHER ACTION ITEMS: Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The City Council may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

Note: No additional major projects or programs should be undertaken without review of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006). a. Discuss the pros and cons of including City Council members or City Council recommended members to the Community Panel that will interview police chief candidates ; and d iscuss other aspects of the hiring process if City Council has other ideas ; and p rovide staff with any further direction in the matter.
b. Discuss for not more than 30 minutes any projects from the below project list and provide staff with any further direction in the matter

14. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council rep orts on meetings and conferences attended (Gov’t Code Section 53232).

15. ADJOURNMENT:

CERTIFICATION

I, Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Marina, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at C ity Hall and Council Cha mbers Bulletin Board at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Monterey County Library Ma rina Branch at 190 Seaside Circle, City Bu lletin Board at the corner of Reservatio n Road and Del Mon te Boule vard on or before 6:30 p.m., Friday, January 13, 2023.

___________________________________

ANITA SHARP, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
City Council, Airport Co mmission and Redevelopment Agency meetings are recorded on tape and available for public review and listening at the Office of the City Clerk and kept for a per iod of 90 days after the formal approval of MINUTES.

City Council meetings may be viewed live on the meeting night and at 12:30 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. on Cable Channel 25 on the Sund ay following the R egular C ity Cou ncil meeting date. In addition, Council meetings can be viewed at 6:3 0 p.m. every Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. For more information about viewing the Council Meetings on Channel 25, you may contact Access Monterey Peninsula directly at 831-333-1267.

Agenda items and staff reports are public record and are available for public review on the City's website (www.ciytofmarina.org), at the Monterey County Marina Library Branch at 190 Seaside Circle and at the Office of the City Clerk at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina between the hours of 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m., on the Monday preceding the meeting.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, January 18, 2023 Page 6

Supplemental materials received after the close o f the final agenda and through noon on t he day of the scheduled meeting w ill be available for public review at the Cit y Clerk’s Office during r egular office hours and in a ‘Supplemental Binder’ at the meeting.

ALL MEETINGS ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. THE CIT Y OF MARINA DOES N OT DISCRIMINATE AGAI NST PERSONS WITH D ISABILITIES. Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible. Meetings are broadcast on cab le channel 25 and recordings of meetings can be provided upon request . To request assistive listening devices, s ign language interpreters, readers, la rge print agendas or other accommodations, please call (831) 884 -1278 or e -mail:
[email protected]. Requests must be made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.

U p c o m i n g 20 2 3 M e e t i n g s o f t h e C i t y C o u n c i l, A i r p o r t C om m i s s i o n, M a r i n a Ab r a m s B N o n - P r o f i t C o r p o r a t i on , P r e s t o n P ar k S u s t a i n a b l e C o m m u n i t y N o n p r o f i t C o r p o r a t i o n , S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y o f t h e F o r m e r R e d e v e l o p me n t A g e n c y a n d M a r i n a G r o u n d w a t e r S u s t a i n a b i l i t y A g e n c y R e g u l a r M eet i n g s : 5: 0 0 p . m . C l o s e d S e s si on; 6 : 30 p .m . R e g u la r O p e n S e s s i o n s

*Wednesday, January 18, 2023

*Wednesday, July 5, 2023
Tuesday, July 18, 2023

Tuesday, February 7, 2023
*Wednesday, February 22, 2023

**Wednesday, August 2, 2023
Tuesday, August 15, 2023

Tuesday, March 7, 2023
Tuesday, March 21, 2023

*Wednesday, September 6, 2023
Tuesday, September 19, 2023

Tuesday, April 4, 2023
Tuesday, April 18, 2023

Tuesday, October 3, 2023
Tuesday, October 17, 2023

Tuesday, May 2, 2023
Tuesday, May 16, 2023

Tuesday, November 7, 2023
Tuesday, November 21, 2023

Tuesday, June 6, 2023
Tuesday, June 20, 2023

Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Tuesday, December 19, 2023
* Regular Meeting rescheduled due to Monday Holiday
** Regular Meeting rescheduled due to National Night Out

CI TY H A L L 2023 H O L I D A Y S
(City Hall Closed)

Martin Luther King Jr. Birthday ------------------------------------ Monday, January 16, 2023 Presidents’ Day ------------------------------------------------------- Monday, February 20, 2023 Memorial Day ------------------------------------------------------------- Monday, May 27, 2023 Independence Day (City Offices Closed) ------------------------------- Tuesday, July 4, 2023 Labor Day ------------------------------------------------------------ Monday, September 4, 2023 Veterans Day (City Offices Closed) ------------------------------- Friday, November 10, 2023 Agenda for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, January 18, 2023 Page 7

Thanksgiving Day ------------------------------------------------- Thursday, November 23, 2023 Thanksgiving Break -------------------------------------------------- Friday, November 24, 2023 Winter Break ---------------------- Monday, December 25, 2023-Friday, December 29, 2023

2023 COMMISSION DATES

U p c o m i n g 20 2 3 Me e t i n g s of D e s i g n R e v i e w B o a r d 3rd Wednesday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M. ** = Change in location due to conflict with Council meeting

March 16, 2023 June 15, 2023 September 21, 2023
April 20, 2023 July 20, 2023 October 19, 2023
May 18, 2023 August 17, 2023 November 16, 2023
December 21, 2023

U p c o m i n g 202 3 Me e t i n g s o f E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e nt C o m m i s s i on
3rd Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 4:00 P.M.

March 17, 2023 June 16, 2023 September 15, 2023
April 21, 2023 July 21, 2023 October 20, 2023
May 19, 2023 August 18, 2023 November 17, 2023
December 15, 2023 (Cancelled)

Up c o m i n g 202 3 Me e t i n g s o f P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n 2nd and 4th Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

January 26, 2023 May 11, 2023 September 14, 2023
February 9, 2023 May 25, 2023 September 28, 2023
February 23, 2023 (Cancelled) June 8, 2023 October 12, 2023 March 9, 2023 June 22, 2023 October 26, 2023
March 23, 2023 July13, 2023 November 16, 2023
April 13, 2023 July 27, 2023 November 30, 2023
April 27, 2023 August 10, 2023 December 14, 2023
August 24, 2023

U p c o m i n g 2 02 3 M e e t i n g s o f P u b l i c W o r k s C o m m i s s i o n 3rd Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

January 19, 2023 May 18, 2023 September 21, 2023
February 16, 2023 June 15, 2023 October 19, 2023
March 16, 2023 July 20, 2023 November 16, 2023
April 20, 2023 August 17, 2023 December 21, 2023

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, January 18, 2023 Page 8

Up c o m i n g 202 3 M e e t i n g s o f R ec r e a t i o n & C u l t u r a l Se r v i c es C o m mi ss i on
1st Wednesday of every quarter month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

April 6, 2023 September 1, 2023 December 1, 2023

Upc o mi n g 202 3 M e e t i n g s o f M a r i n a T r e e C o m m i t t e e 2nd Wednesday of every quarter month as needed. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

April 13, 2023 July 13, 2023 October 12, 2023

Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.305 - Prof Svc HR - Citywide Recruit/Background 10872 - Pinnacle Healthcare 405420 Pinnacle Healthcare - Pre Emp Px
Paid by Check
# 101443
12/15/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 12/22/2022 297.00
Account 6300.305 - Prof Svc HR - Citywide Recruit/Background Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $297.00 Account 6300.770 - Prof Svc Temp Staffing Agency
10508 - Regional Government Services 14319 Professional Services - HR Department -
November 2022
Paid by Check
# 101462
11/30/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 1,112.50
Account 6300.770 - Prof Svc Temp Staffing Agency Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,112.50 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9922578828 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by Check
# 101457
12/10/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 174.06
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $174.06 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $1,583.56 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $1,583.56 Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $1,583.56 Department 130 - Finance
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.216 - Prof Svc Fin - Accounting Services
10511 - Richard B. Standridge 22-25 Service 12/6-15/2022 Paid by EFT # 2800
12/16/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 3,420.00
Account 6300.216 - Prof Svc Fin - Accounting Services Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $3,420.00 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9922578828 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by Check
# 101457
12/10/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 88.59
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $88.59 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10732 - Office Depot-General Account 279770666001 Office Supplies-Finance Paid by Check # 101439
12/14/2022 12/14/2022 12/14/2022 12/22/2022 68.96
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $68.96 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $3,577.55 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $3,577.55 Department 130 - Finance Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $3,577.55 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 1 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22
- 12/22/22
Agenda Item: 10a
1 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 150 - City Attorney
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc 10257 - Goldfarb & Lipman 460350 General File -
November 2022
Paid by Check
# 101419
12/19/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 224.00
10257 - Goldfarb & Lipman 460351 Marina Heights -
November 2022
Paid by Check
# 101419
12/19/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 2,240.00
10257 - Goldfarb & Lipman 460352 The Dunes - November
2022
Paid by Check
# 101419
12/19/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 2,272.00
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $4,736.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $4,736.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $4,736.00 Department 150 - City Attorney Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $4,736.00 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.230 - Prof Svc Fin - Tax Reporting & Audit 10274 - Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates
( HDL )
SIN023470 Sales Tax Audit Fees
Oct - Dec 2022
Paid by Check
# 101422
12/09/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 1,694.67
Account 6300.230 - Prof Svc Fin - Tax Reporting & Audit Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,694.67 Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11425 - Formation Environmental, LLC 7371 Groundwater
Sustainability Plan
Paid by Check
# 101415
12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 5,567.50
11769 - STEARNS, CONRAD & SCHMIDT

CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC
0425846 Odor Attribution Study Paid by Check
# 101450
11/30/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 9,561.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $15,128.50 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019211461 CALNET3-9391023436 (239-461-6578)
Paid by Check
# 101407
12/13/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 68.96
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019220965 CALNET3-9391023482 (884-0985)
Paid by Check
# 101407
12/15/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 26.65
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019220967 CALNET3-9391023485 (884-2573)
Paid by Check
# 101407
12/15/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 27.64
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019220972 CALNET3-9391023490 (884-9568)
Paid by Check
# 101407
12/15/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 49.95
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019220973 CALNET3-9391023491 (884-9654)
Paid by Check
# 101407
12/15/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 87.65
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $260.85 Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 2023-00000586 PG&E 6793435313-6 Paid by Check # 101442
12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 9,964.54
Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 2 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
2 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 22 562-0 PG&E - 4758891562-0 Paid by Check # 101442
12/11/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 1,164.22
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $11,128.76 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056041
113022
Water Bill - Usage at
Station 2 - 3260 Imjin
Road
Paid by Check
# 101427
11/30/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 262.74
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $262.74 Account 6600.010 - Other Charges Alarm
10239 - First Alarm 721032 Remote Alarm Code
Updates
Paid by EFT #
2799
12/09/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 35.00
Account 6600.010 - Other Charges Alarm Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $35.00 Account 6600.450 - Other Charges Leases & Rents
10579 - Transportation Agency of Monterey
County
TAMC Dec 2022 Handcart Lease Pymt Paid by Check
# 101452
12/14/2022 12/14/2022 12/14/2022 12/22/2022 8,858.00
Account 6600.450 - Other Charges Leases & Rents Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $8,858.00 Account 6600.452 - Other Charges Leased Copier
11451 - Monterey Bay Office Products - US
Bank
488839135 City Hall Copier Lease
Payment - December
2022
Paid by Check
# 101430
12/04/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 380.20
Account 6600.452 - Other Charges Leased Copier Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $380.20 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 14 $37,748.72 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 14 $37,748.72 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 14 $37,748.72 Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10326 - Language Line, LLC 10659960 Acct #9020101064 Paid by Check # 101426
10/31/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 331.56
10342 - Monterey County Peace Officers
Association-MCPOA
2022087R Marina 2022 Paid by Check
# 101433
10/07/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 665.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $996.56 Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building
10239 - First Alarm 717782 Cust #9537 - Marina
Public Safety Dept.

Paid by EFT #
2799
11/15/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 187.08
Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $187.08 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 3 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
3 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10592 - U.S. Bank Equipment Finance-
USbancorp
488119660 Customer Credit Acct
#598296
Paid by Check
# 101453
11/26/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 1,291.14
10627 - Zoom Imaging Solutions IN3095765 Acct # SOS-CIT-1600-Z - City of Marina PD
Paid by Check
# 101459
11/23/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 417.32
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,708.46 Account 6370.010 - Shared Svc 911
10411 - Monterey County - Emergency
Communications
12-02-22 Monterey County
Emergency
Communication Quarter
3 Invoice 22/23
Paid by Check
# 101431
12/02/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 112,605.30
Account 6370.010 - Shared Svc 911 Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $112,605.30 Account 6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M
10411 - Monterey County - Emergency
Communications
12-02-22 Monterey County
Emergency
Communication Quarter
3 Invoice 22/23
Paid by Check
# 101431
12/02/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 10,218.62
Account 6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $10,218.62 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9921436297 Acct #371782403-
00002
Paid by Check
# 101457
11/25/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 883.46
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9920838170 Acct #272493672-
00001
Paid by Check
# 101457
11/18/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 4,881.50
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $5,764.96 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019220996 CALNET3-9391023435 (237-267-6922)
Paid by Check
# 101407
12/15/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 184.16
10053 - AT & T 11-21-22 Acct #051 935-4017
001
Paid by Check
# 101406
11/21/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 52.72
10053 - AT & T 11-14-22 Acct #831 384-7723
454 4
Paid by Check
# 101406
11/14/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 754.56
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019079573 BAN #9391023478 Paid by Check # 101407
11/15/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 51.07
10057 - Avaya, Inc. 2734626553 Acct #0100828859 Paid by EFT # 2798
11/04/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 12.49
10057 - Avaya, Inc. 2221598702 Cust #2578885 Paid by EFT # 2798
11/28/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 10.30
10153 - Comcast 11-26-22 Acct #8155 10 029
0083819
Paid by Check
# 101411
11/26/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 69.70
Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 4 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
4 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10374 - Maynard Group Inc. IN2032207 Acct #AC3746 Paid by Check # 101429
12/01/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 655.27
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $1,790.27 Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 11-09-22 Acct #2652040767-2 Paid by Check # 101442
11/09/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 82.01
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $82.01 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 11-30-22 Acct #000056 091 Paid by Check # 101427
11/30/2022 12/06/2022 12/06/2022 12/22/2022 225.69
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 10-31-22 Acct #000056 091 Paid by Check # 101427
10/31/2022 12/06/2022 12/06/2022 12/22/2022 150.82
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 09-29-22 A Acct #000056 091 Paid by Check # 101427
09/29/2022 12/06/2022 12/06/2022 12/22/2022 150.82
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 08-31-22 A Acct #000056 091 Paid by Check # 101427
08/31/2022 12/06/2022 12/06/2022 12/22/2022 150.82
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 06-30-22 Acct #000056 091 Paid by Check # 101427
06/30/2022 12/06/2022 12/06/2022 12/22/2022 155.54
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $833.69 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10498 - Quill Corporation 28699552 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101444
10/31/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 255.62
10498 - Quill Corporation 28818920 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101444
11/04/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 22.49
10498 - Quill Corporation 28823998 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101444
11/07/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 89.57
10498 - Quill Corporation 28699378 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101444
10/31/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 69.88
10498 - Quill Corporation 29027186 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101444
11/16/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 17.03
10498 - Quill Corporation 28908398 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101444
11/09/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 23.14
10498 - Quill Corporation 28991229 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101444
11/14/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 150.74
10498 - Quill Corporation 29149639 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101444
11/22/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 76.46
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $704.93 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 5 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
5 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping
10235 - FedEx 7-943-54370 Acct #3995-9218-6 Paid by Check # 101414
11/11/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 108.53
10235 - FedEx 7-951-41345 Acct #3995-9218-6 Paid by Check # 101414
11/18/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 265.28
10235 - FedEx 7-935-97866 Acct #3995-9218-6 Paid by Check # 101414
11/04/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 95.95
Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $469.76 Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip
10727 - Ace Hardware-Public Safety 0837774 Cust. # 116 Paid by Check # 101401
12/01/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 49.15
Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $49.15 Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
10935 - South Bay Regional Public Safety
Training Cons.
223244 Driving PSP - AM 10/26 Paid by Check
# 101449
11/09/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 150.00
10935 - South Bay Regional Public Safety
Training Cons.
223280 Field Training Officers
Course - 10/17-10/22,
Santana
Paid by Check
# 101449
11/21/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 177.00
10935 - South Bay Regional Public Safety
Training Cons.
223259 Driving PSP Course AM-
10/12/22, Aiello,
Beavers
Paid by Check
# 101449
11/17/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 300.00
Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $627.00 Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking
10253 - George T. Powell 12022022 Parking Rental Fees Paid by Check # 101418
12/01/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 997.00
10253 - George T. Powell 11022022 Parking Rental Fee Paid by Check # 101418
11/01/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 1,300.00
10253 - George T. Powell 10012022 Parking Rental Fee Paid by Check # 101418
10/01/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 1,300.00
Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $3,597.00 Account 6600.465 - Other Charges Live Scan
10193 - California Department of Justice 614475 Cust #110312 Paid by Check # 101409
11/03/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 79.00
Account 6600.465 - Other Charges Live Scan Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $79.00 Account 6600.625 - Other Charges Printing Svc
10524 - Ryan Ranch Printers, LP 23296 Cust #161 Paid by Check # 101446
11/28/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 103.79
10524 - Ryan Ranch Printers, LP 23285 Cust #161 Paid by Check # 101446
11/28/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 330.93
Account 6600.625 - Other Charges Printing Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $434.72 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 44 $140,148.51 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 6 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
6 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 44 $140,148.51 Department 210 - Police Totals Invoice Transactions 44 $140,148.51 Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122501 Plan review &
inspection at
Joby/Cirpas FA TI,
3200 Imjin
Paid by Check
# 101410
12/06/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 200.00
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122504 Plan review &
inspection at Marina
5000, 479 Marina
Heights Dr
Paid by Check
# 101410
12/08/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 200.00
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122493 Plan review &
inspection at Marina
5000, 477 Marina
Heights Dr
Paid by Check
# 101410
11/29/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 200.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 47919 Fire Inspections by
CSG: Eric Rodewald
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/09/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 1,425.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 46792 Fire Inspections by
CSG: Eric Rodewald
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 3,420.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 47178 Fire Inspections by
CSG: Eric Rodewald
Paid by Check
# 101461
11/15/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 2,755.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $8,200.00 Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10185 - DCS Testing & Equipment 19659 Fire Hose Testing - 11,620 feet
Paid by Check
# 101413
12/13/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 3,369.80
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $3,369.80 Account 6370.010 - Shared Svc 911
10411 - Monterey County - Emergency
Communications
12-02-22 Monterey County
Emergency
Communication Quarter
3 Invoice 22/23
Paid by Check
# 101431
12/02/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 12,511.70
Account 6370.010 - Shared Svc 911 Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $12,511.70 Account 6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M
10411 - Monterey County - Emergency
Communications
12-02-22 Monterey County
Emergency
Communication Quarter
3 Invoice 22/23
Paid by Check
# 101431
12/02/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 3,806.93
Account 6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $3,806.93 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 7 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
7 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
10159 - Consolidated Electrical Distributors,
Inc
4914-1022600 Fire Dept Paid by Check
# 101412
11/22/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 101.89
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $101.89 Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
11720 - Helping Hands Health Education,
LLC
340 CPR Training Paid by Check
# 101421
12/08/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 143.00
Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $143.00 Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking
10253 - George T. Powell 12022022 Parking Rental Fees Paid by Check # 101418
12/01/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 303.00
Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $303.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $28,436.32 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $28,436.32 Department 250 - Fire Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $28,436.32 Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083935 Supplies Paid by Check # 101402
12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 16.38
10275 - Home Depot Credit Service 12-13-22 PW Home Depot (6035 3225 0395 9813)
Paid by Check
# 101423
12/13/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 110.19
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $126.57 Account 6360.070 - Maint & Repairs Bdg Public Safety
10459 - Overhead Door Company 129437 PD Paid by Check
# 101441
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 295.00
Account 6360.070 - Maint & Repairs Bdg Public Safety Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $295.00 Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General
10090 - California Department of Forestry
and Fire Pr.
0000001486761 Reimbursement for
Gabilan Camp/Salinas
Ave
Paid by Check
# 101408
12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 907.76
10952 - MuttMitt - ZW USA Inc. 521857 Park Supply Paid by Check # 101436
12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 237.05
Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,144.81 Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083879 Supplies Paid by Check # 101402
12/13/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 31.65
Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 8 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
8 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083912 Yard Cameras Paid by Check # 101402
12/16/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 8.73
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083927 Shop Paid by Check # 101402
12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 21.84
Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $62.22 Account 6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M
10411 - Monterey County - Emergency
Communications
12-02-22 Monterey County
Emergency
Communication Quarter
3 Invoice 22/23
Paid by Check
# 101431
12/02/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 4,189.45
Account 6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $4,189.45 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056014
120822
3200 Del Monte Blvd Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 382.32
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056011
120822
3254 Abdy Way (Tate-
Park Irrigation)
Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 89.02
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056098
120822
3254 Abdy Way (Tate
Park-Building)
Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 50.60
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056034
120822
3240 De Forest Road Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 78.77
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $600.71 Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110131557 PW Uniforms Paid by Check # 101405
12/14/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 136.34
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110135523 PW Uniforms Paid by Check # 101405
12/21/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 130.97
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $267.31 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $6,686.07 Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $6,686.07 Division 313 - Vehicle Maint
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies
10403 - NAPA Auto Parts - former Monterey
Auto Supply
4006-952289 PD Paid by Check
# 101438
12/14/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 143.10
Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $143.10 Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
10437 - My Chevrolet CVCS256810 12 Chevy
Truck/Colorado
Paid by Check
# 101437
12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 3,121.60
Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 9 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
9 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 313 - Vehicle Maint
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
10528 - Salinas Valley Ford 96946 PD 15 Ford Explorer Paid by Check # 101447
12/15/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 1,454.07
Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $4,575.67 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $4,718.77 Division 313 - Vehicle Maint Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $4,718.77 Department 310 - Public Works Totals Invoice Transactions 18 $11,404.84 Department 410 - Planning
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.610 - Prof Svc Planning - Consultant
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates 23335960 MARINA HOZ VMT

ANALYSIS
Paid by Check
# 101425
11/30/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 12/22/2022 10,063.00
Account 6300.610 - Prof Svc Planning - Consultant Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $10,063.00 Account 6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning
10171 - CSG Consultants 48079 Marina Station Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 4,466.50
Account 6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $4,466.50 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9922578828 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by Check
# 101457
12/10/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 50.58
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $50.58 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $14,580.08 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $14,580.08 Department 410 - Planning Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $14,580.08 Department 420 - Engineering
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.175 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Plan Check 10171 - CSG Consultants 48093 Dunes Phase 2 North-
Inspections
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 264.00
Account 6300.175 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Plan Check Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $264.00 Account 6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection 10171 - CSG Consultants 48073 Permits/Development Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 14,094.00
Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 10 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
10 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 420 - Engineering
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection 10171 - CSG Consultants 48095 Dunes Phase 3
(Backbone)-Inspections
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 3,696.00
Account 6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $17,790.00 Account 6300.185 - Prof Svc Engineering Svs-Staff Augment 10171 - CSG Consultants 48074 Staff Augmentation Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 2,366.00
Account 6300.185 - Prof Svc Engineering Svs-Staff Augment Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,366.00 Account 6300.190 - Prof Svc Engineering Svc Interagency 10171 - CSG Consultants 48075 RWQCB Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 169.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48076 FORA Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 507.00
Account 6300.190 - Prof Svc Engineering Svc Interagency Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $676.00 Account 6330.200 - Fee Agr Costs - Engineering
10171 - CSG Consultants 48087 Dunes Phase 1B
Promenade
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 10,990.50
10171 - CSG Consultants 48077 Sea Haven Phase 3
Map/Plan Review
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 1,098.50
10171 - CSG Consultants 48080 Dunes Phase 2 East Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 6,769.50
10171 - CSG Consultants 48081 Dunes Phase 2 West Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 507.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48082 Dunes Op Site 1A Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 676.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48083 Dunes Park Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 676.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48084 Hampton Inn (120
Reservation Road)
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 2,714.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48088 Via Del Mar Subdivision
(3320 Abdy Way)
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 2,640.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48089 Sea Haven Phase 4
Rough Grading
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 3,960.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48090 Home2Suites by Hilton Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 1,716.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48091 Via Del Mar Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 660.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48092 Quick Quack Carwash Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 2,376.00
Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 11 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
11 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 420 - Engineering
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6330.200 - Fee Agr Costs - Engineering
10171 - CSG Consultants 48094 Dunes Phase 2 East-
Inspections
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 4,356.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48096 200 Reservation Rd
(Starbucks)
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 1,848.00
Account 6330.200 - Fee Agr Costs - Engineering Totals Invoice Transactions 14 $40,987.50 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 20 $62,083.50 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 20 $62,083.50 Department 420 - Engineering Totals Invoice Transactions 20 $62,083.50 Department 430 - Building Inspection
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.070 - Prof Svc Building Plan Check & Inspection 10171 - CSG Consultants B222117 CSG Building Plan
Review Services
11/1/2022 -
11/30/2022
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/01/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 3,727.50
10171 - CSG Consultants 48085 Sea Haven Inspection
Phase 3B
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 1,716.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48086 Sea Haven Phase 4
Map/Plan Review
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 3,982.00
Account 6300.070 - Prof Svc Building Plan Check & Inspection Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $9,425.50 Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10171 - CSG Consultants 48078 Sea Haven Phase 3A
Inspection
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 1,056.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,056.00 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10734 - Office Depot-Public Works Dept. 279921021001 PW Corp Yard Paid by Check # 101440
12/08/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 21.10
10734 - Office Depot-Public Works Dept. 280829352001 PW Office Paid by Check # 101440
12/07/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 65.29
10734 - Office Depot-Public Works Dept. 281621478001 PW Office/Engineering Paid by Check # 101440
12/05/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 10.51
10734 - Office Depot-Public Works Dept. 281621642001 Office Supplies/Building Paid by Check # 101440
12/05/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 29.54
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $126.44 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $10,607.94 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $10,607.94 Department 430 - Building Inspection Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $10,607.94 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 12 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
12 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 510 - Recreation & Culture
Division 100 - Admin
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10053 - AT & T Dec 22 520 5 AT&T 831-582-9957
520 5
Paid by Check
# 101406
12/13/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 269.11
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $269.11 Account 6600.740 - Other Charges Special Event
10301 - Janice Griffin 12-18-22 Christmas Dinner -
Santa and Mrs. Claus
Appearance
Paid by Check
# 101424
12/02/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 275.00
11763 - Terry Poole Jr. 12-18-2022 Bounce House for
Winterfest Event
Paid by Check
# 101451
12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/16/2022 12/22/2022 260.00
Account 6600.740 - Other Charges Special Event Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $535.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $804.11 Division 100 - Admin Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $804.11 Division 513 - Senior
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.570 - Material & Suppl Others, Misc
10014 - Ace Hardware-General Account 083876 Supplies for Seniors Paid by Check # 101400
12/13/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 27.06
Account 6400.570 - Material & Suppl Others, Misc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $27.06 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $27.06 Division 513 - Senior Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $27.06 Department 510 - Recreation & Culture Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $831.17 Fund 100 - General Fund Totals Invoice Transactions 132 $315,738.19 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 13 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
13 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 220 - Gas Tax
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 2023-00000586 PG&E 6793435313-6 Paid by Check # 101442
12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 686.94
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Nov - Dec 720-
0 PG&E - 0167505720-0 Paid by Check
# 101442
12/10/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 1,107.63
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Nov - Dec 085-
2 PG&E - 5434906085-2 Paid by Check
# 101442
12/10/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 111.18
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Nov - Dec 148-
6 PG&E - 5593414148-6 Paid by Check
# 101442
12/09/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 258.90
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Nov - Dec 943-
2 PG&E - 6150212943-2 Paid by Check
# 101442
12/09/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 80.29
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Nov - Dec 202-
3 PG&E - 6594070202-3 Paid by Check
# 101442
12/10/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 115.16
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Nov - Dec 582-
7 PG&E - 8161432582-7 Paid by Check
# 101442
12/09/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 151.24
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Nov - Dec 353-
7 PG&E - 9930567353-7 Paid by Check
# 101442
12/09/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 109.21
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 22 827-8 PG&E - 0423929827-8 Paid by Check # 101442
12/13/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 130.10
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 22 210-0 PG&E - 3242976210-0 Paid by Check # 101442
12/11/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 201.92
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 22 851-0 PG&E - 3440977851-0 Paid by Check # 101442
12/14/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 176.70
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 22 535-3 PG&E - 6161832535-3 Paid by Check # 101442
12/13/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 294.08
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $3,423.35 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056084
120822
Crescent/Shuler/Irrigati
on
Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 27.26
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056085
120822
Crescent/Whitney
Irrigation
Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 27.26
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056008
120822
Reservation & Del
Monte
Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 27.26
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056087
120822
Crescent Ave/Costa Del
Mar Irrigation
Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 27.26
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056030
120822
Crescent Ave/Reser
Rd/Ramada Inn
Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 36.77
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056086
120822
Crescent Ave/Sirena
Del Mar Irrigation
Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 27.26
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056032
120822
Crescent Ave/Costa Del
Mar East Side
Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 60.52
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $233.59 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 14 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
14 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 220 - Gas Tax
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
10540 - Sierra Springs & Alhambra 9696351
121722
2660 5th Ave Corp
Yard
Paid by Check
# 101448
12/17/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 110.91
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $110.91 Account 6400.750 - Material & Suppl Street Material (non-capitalize) 10261 - Graniterock/Pavex Construction 2066523 Marina Dr Road Repair Paid by Check # 101420
12/10/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 208.47
Account 6400.750 - Material & Suppl Street Material (non-capitalize) Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $208.47 Account 6400.780 - Material & Suppl Traffic Signal
10159 - Consolidated Electrical Distributors,
Inc
4914-1021060 Streets Paid by Check
# 101412
10/10/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 87.00
Account 6400.780 - Material & Suppl Traffic Signal Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $87.00 Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110131565 Shop Supplies Paid by Check # 101405
12/14/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 88.61
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110135531 PW Shop Supplies Paid by Check # 101405
12/21/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 62.36
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $150.97 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 24 $4,214.29 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 24 $4,214.29 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 24 $4,214.29 Fund 220 - Gas Tax Totals Invoice Transactions 24 $4,214.29 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 15 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
15 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 233 - Monterey Bay Estates AD
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 2023-00000586 PG&E 6793435313-6 Paid by Check # 101442
12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 11.11
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $11.11 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $11.11 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $11.11 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $11.11 Fund 233 - Monterey Bay Estates AD Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $11.11 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 16 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
16 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 235 - Cypress Cove II AD
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection 10171 - CSG Consultants 48068 Cypress Coves II Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 338.00
Account 6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $338.00 Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 2023-00000586 PG&E 6793435313-6 Paid by Check # 101442
12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 .00
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $0.00 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056015
120822
Corner of Cardoza &
Dolphin Circle
Paid by Check
# 101427
12/08/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 60.52
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $60.52 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $398.52 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $398.52 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $398.52 Fund 235 - Cypress Cove II AD Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $398.52 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 17 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
17 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 422 - Capital Projects - Measure X
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10171 - CSG Consultants 48069 Annual Street
Resurfacing
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 1,468.00
11037 - Don Chapin Company, Inc. 75683 SW Repair Paid by Check # 101463
12/12/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 688.04
11037 - Don Chapin Company, Inc. 75682 SW Repair Paid by Check # 101463
12/12/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 8,835.74
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $10,991.78 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $10,991.78 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $10,991.78 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $10,991.78 Fund 422 - Capital Projects - Measure X Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $10,991.78 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 18 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
18 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 460 - Airport Capital Projects
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 57900 Airport Fuel Farm
Backup Power
Paid by Check
# 101458
11/22/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 87.50
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 57899 Airport Fuel Farm 100L Tank Replacement
Paid by Check
# 101458
11/22/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 2,843.75
11456 - William A. Thayer Construction, Inc 2021-12-3 Desert Star Office Bldg 518 at 3261 Imjin Rd
Paid by EFT #
2801
09/28/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 6,955.68
11456 - William A. Thayer Construction, Inc 2021-12-RET Desert Star Office Bldg 518 at 3261 Imjin Rd
Paid by EFT #
2801
09/28/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 2,609.23
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $12,496.16 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $12,496.16 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $12,496.16 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $12,496.16 Fund 460 - Airport Capital Projects Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $12,496.16 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 19 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
19 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 462 - City Capital Projects
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10425 - Monterey Peninsula Engineering 11-10 Glorya Jean Tate Park Site Improvements and
Pump Track
Paid by Check
# 101435
12/13/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 225,726.62
11266 - Verde Design, Inc. 4-2121701 Dunes Park
Development Project
Paid by Check
# 101456
12/05/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 15,903.06
10171 - CSG Consultants 48070 Imjin Widening Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 3,718.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48071 PFIF Update Paid by Check # 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 845.00
10171 - CSG Consultants 48072 Patton Parkway
Retaining Wall
Paid by Check
# 101461
12/12/2022 12/19/2022 12/19/2022 12/22/2022 264.00
11777 - Marina Equestrian Association 9270 8 Stall Mare Motel Barn Paid by Check # 101428
12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 8,000.00
11183 - Rincon Corporation 44614 - Marina DVSP Paid by Check # 101445
12/19/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 7,972.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $262,428.68 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $262,428.68 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $262,428.68 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $262,428.68 Fund 462 - City Capital Projects Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $262,428.68 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 20 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
20 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc 10249 - Gatzke Dillon & Ballance 14260 781 Neeson Rd Airport Issues
Paid by Check
# 101416
11/04/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 420.00
10249 - Gatzke Dillon & Ballance 14205 781 Neeson Rd
Professional Services
Airport
Paid by Check
# 101416
10/11/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 560.00
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $980.00 Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58001 Airport Project
Management
Paid by Check
# 101458
11/22/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 380.50
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $380.50 Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083675 Airport Paid by Check # 101402
11/21/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 3.81
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083581 Airport Paid by Check # 101402
11/10/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 15.27
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083576 Airport Paid by Check # 101402
11/10/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 34.95
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083572 Airport Paid by Check # 101402
11/10/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 32.75
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083845 Airport Paid by Check # 101402
12/09/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 5.00
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083839 Airport Paid by Check # 101402
12/08/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 54.61
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083822 Airport Paid by Check # 101402
12/07/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 81.88
10035 - Andersen's Lock & Safe, Inc. 42397 Airport Paid by Check # 101404
11/18/2022 11/18/2022 11/18/2022 12/22/2022 600.36
10035 - Andersen's Lock & Safe, Inc. 43146O Airport Re-key Paid by Check # 101404
11/19/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 180.21
Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building Totals Invoice Transactions 9 $1,008.84 Account 6360.280 - Maint & Repairs Habitat Management Svc 10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0149436 781 Neeson, Building 520 Squirrels
Paid by Check
# 101417
11/11/2022 11/18/2022 11/18/2022 12/22/2022 1,150.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0149437 781 Neeson Rd
Building 520 Rodents
Paid by Check
# 101417
11/11/2022 11/18/2022 11/18/2022 12/22/2022 75.00
Account 6360.280 - Maint & Repairs Habitat Management Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,225.00 Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10034 - American Supply Co. 2986061 Airport Supplies Paid by Check # 101403
12/02/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 1,052.97
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,052.97 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 21 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
21 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General
10154 - Commercial Environment
Landscape
2796-1122 Marina Airport Medians Paid by Check
# 101460
11/21/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 2,900.00
10275 - Home Depot Credit Service 12-13-22 PW Home Depot (6035 3225 0395 9813)
Paid by Check
# 101423
12/13/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/22/2022 261.78
Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $3,161.78 Account 6360.566 - Maint & Repairs Other Equipment
10582 - Uline Shipping Supply 155917755 Airport Paid by Check # 101454
11/02/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 151.39
11771 - US Fuelling Solution 24524 Airport Fuel Paid by Check # 101455
11/23/2022 12/02/2022 12/02/2022 12/22/2022 2,600.65
Account 6360.566 - Maint & Repairs Other Equipment Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $2,752.04 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019125048 Fire Alarms Hgr 524 533
Paid by Check
# 101407
11/28/2022 12/02/2022 12/02/2022 12/06/2022 12/22/2022 50.85 10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019125053 AWOS Auto Weather
Station
Paid by Check
# 101407
11/28/2022 12/02/2022 12/02/2022 12/22/2022 28.37
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019125047 Fire Alarms Hgr 524 533
Paid by Check
# 101407
11/28/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 50.85
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $130.07 Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 098-7.Dec22 761 Neeson Rd Bldg 524 (6800558098-7)
Paid by Check
# 101442
12/10/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 11,153.07
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 103-6.Nov22 3200 Imjin Rd Paid by Check # 101442
11/18/2022 11/18/2022 11/18/2022 12/22/2022 4,513.64
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 288-5.Nov22 781 Neeson Rd Bldg 520 (717566022-8)
Paid by Check
# 101442
11/09/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2022 12/22/2022 201.92
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 288-5.Oct22 781 Neeson Rd Bldg 520 (7175660288-5)
Paid by Check
# 101442
10/11/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 305.29
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 288-5.Dec22 781 Neeson Rd Bldg 520 (7175660288-5)
Paid by Check
# 101442
12/10/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 244.17
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 608-2.Dec22 3260 Imjin Rd Bldg 514 (7383993608-2)
Paid by Check
# 101442
12/10/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 1,297.54
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 767-2.Dec22 751 Neeson Rd Bldg 526 (2652040767-2)
Paid by Check
# 101442
12/10/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 107.90
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 694-1.Dec22 721 Neeson Rd Bldg 533 (7269284694-1)
Paid by Check
# 101442
12/10/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 1,558.27
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 451-7.Dec22 3271 Imjin Rd (8600650451-7)
Paid by Check
# 101442
12/09/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 182.31
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 103-6.Dec22 3200 Imjin Rd (8030427103-6)
Paid by Check
# 101442
12/09/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 4,483.86
Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 22 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
22 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 347-0.Dec22 3263 Imjin Rd Bldg 519 (6258961347-0)
Paid by Check
# 101442
12/09/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 723.30
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 11 $24,771.27 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056097
113022
3200 Imjin Rd/Airport Paid by Check
# 101427
11/30/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 623.48
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056096
113022
3271 Imjin Rd/Airport Paid by Check
# 101427
11/30/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 107.88
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056092
113022
741 Neeson
Road/Airport
Paid by Check
# 101427
11/30/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 1,156.70
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056051
113022
721 Neeson Rd/Airport Paid by Check
# 101427
11/30/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 243.97
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056043
113022
761 Neeson Rd/Airport Paid by Check
# 101427
11/30/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 841.32
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056044
113022
781 Neeson Rd/Airport Paid by Check
# 101427
11/30/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 12/22/2022 155.54
10432 - Monterey One Water - former
MRWPCA
13-000152
113022
741 Neeson Rd 527 Paid by Check
# 101434
11/30/2022 12/02/2022 12/02/2022 12/22/2022 28.80
10432 - Monterey One Water - former
MRWPCA
13-000148
113022
781 Neeson Rd 520 Paid by Check
# 101434
11/30/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 47.90
10432 - Monterey One Water - former
MRWPCA
13-000149
113022
791 Neeson Rd Paid by Check
# 101434
11/30/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 28.80
10432 - Monterey One Water - former
MRWPCA
13-000153
113022
771 Neeson Rd 529 Paid by Check
# 101434
11/30/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 28.80
10432 - Monterey One Water - former
MRWPCA
13-000157
113022
721 Neeson Rd Bldg
533
Paid by Check
# 101434
11/30/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 191.60
10432 - Monterey One Water - former
MRWPCA
13-0000158
11302
711 Neeson Rd 535 Paid by Check
# 101434
11/30/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 47.90
10432 - Monterey One Water - former
MRWPCA
13-000159
113022
761 Neeson Rd Bldg
524
Paid by Check
# 101434
11/30/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 220.40
10432 - Monterey One Water - former
MRWPCA
13-000144
113022
3200 Imjin Rd 507 Paid by Check
# 101434
11/30/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 28.80
10432 - Monterey One Water - former
MRWPCA
13-000145
113022
3260 Imjin Rd Bldg 514 Paid by Check
# 101434
11/30/2022 12/15/2022 12/15/2022 12/22/2022 47.90
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $3,799.79 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 48 $39,262.26 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 48 $39,262.26 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 48 $39,262.26 Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 23 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
23 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport Totals Invoice Transactions 48 $39,262.26 Grand Totals Invoice Transactions 222 $645,540.99
Run by Rogah Satof on 12/21/2022 03:23:37 PM Page 24 of 24 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 12/22/22 - 12/22/22
24 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.310 - Prof Svc HR - Labor Relation& Negotiation 10335 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 230880 LCW - Professional Services
Paid by Check
# 101479
11/30/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 321.50
Account 6300.310 - Prof Svc HR - Labor Relation& Negotiation Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $321.50 Account 6300.465 - Prof Svc Legal - Special Counsel
11505 - Shartsis Friese LLP 5467545 Professional Services - MPWSP - November
2022
Paid by Check
# 101492
11/29/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 220,654.49
Account 6300.465 - Prof Svc Legal - Special Counsel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $220,654.49 Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10335 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 230240 LCW - Professional Services
Paid by Check
# 101479
11/30/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 2,623.50
10335 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 230904 LCW - Professional Services
Paid by Check
# 101479
11/30/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 3,041.50
10335 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 230918 LCW - Professional Services
Paid by Check
# 101479
11/30/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 248.00
10335 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 230943 LCW - Professional Services
Paid by Check
# 101479
11/30/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 1,670.50
10335 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 230984 LCW - Professional Services
Paid by Check
# 101479
11/30/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 53.00
10335 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 230992 LCW - Professional Services
Paid by Check
# 101479
11/30/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 660.00
10335 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 231021 LCW - Professional Services
Paid by Check
# 101479
11/30/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 1,155.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $9,451.50 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9922578828 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by Check
# 101498
12/10/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 01/06/2023 174.06
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $174.06 Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 10416 - Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
29648A-IN Regular Ethenol Paid by Check
# 101483
12/16/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 89.42
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $89.42 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10732 - Office Depot-General Account 282975915001 2023 3Month Wall Calendars
Paid by Check
# 101489
12/16/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 23.80
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $23.80 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $230,714.77 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $230,714.77 Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $230,714.77 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 1 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
25 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 125 - I. T.

Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.331 - Prof Svc IT - Website Svc
11320 - H&P Publications - April Pastis 2856 Annual Website Maintenance Updates
Paid by Check
# 101474
01/01/2023 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 960.00
Account 6300.331 - Prof Svc IT - Website Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $960.00 Account 6360.076 - Maint & Repairs Copier
10406 - Monterey Bay Systems 438534 CDD Copier
Maintenance and
Overage
Paid by Check
# 101481
12/22/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 1,224.08
Account 6360.076 - Maint & Repairs Copier Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,224.08 Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint 10905 - Taygeta Scientific, Inc. 000423-R-0049 Computer Network Defense - January
2023
Paid by Check
# 101496
01/01/2023 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 2,000.00
10905 - Taygeta Scientific, Inc. 000708-R-0022 Barracuda Spam Firewall - January 2023
Paid by Check
# 101496
01/01/2023 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 475.80
Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $2,475.80 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $4,659.88 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $4,659.88 Department 125 - I. T. Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $4,659.88 Department 130 - Finance
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.216 - Prof Svc Fin - Accounting Services
10511 - Richard B. Standridge 22-26 Service 12/19-29/2022 Paid by EFT # 2828
12/30/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 1,567.50
Account 6300.216 - Prof Svc Fin - Accounting Services Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,567.50 Account 6300.217 - Prof Svc Fin - Business Lic Services 10274 - Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates
( HDL )
SIN023867 Dec 22 BL Admin Fee Paid by Check
# 101503
11/30/2022 11/30/2022 11/30/2022 01/06/2023 21,624.94
Account 6300.217 - Prof Svc Fin - Business Lic Services Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $21,624.94 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9922578828 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by Check
# 101498
12/10/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 01/06/2023 88.59
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $88.59 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $23,281.03 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $23,281.03 Department 130 - Finance Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $23,281.03 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 2 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
26 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 December 2022 CALNET3-9391023454 (384-4226)
Paid by Check
# 101467
12/14/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 3,196.55
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $3,196.55 Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 2022 795-7 PG&E - 4467294795-7 Paid by Check # 101490
12/20/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 850.76
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 2022 172-2 PG&E - 5618207172-2 Paid by Check # 101490
12/18/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 1,890.20
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 2022 683-2 PG&E 6217294683-2 Paid by Check # 101490
12/16/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 137.87
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $2,878.83 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056025
121522
327 Reindollar Ave Paid by Check
# 101480
12/15/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 69.16
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $69.16 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10540 - Sierra Springs & Alhambra 7266038
122322
Water Cooler Rental
and Replacement
Water
Paid by Check
# 101494
12/23/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 98.42
10469 - Stordok 53546940 Document Shredding
Services - City Hall
Paid by Check
# 101495
12/16/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 65.00
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $163.42 Account 6600.090 - Other Charges Claims, Judgments, Damages 11780 - Raymond Robinson - Claim
Resettlement
MBA22-0424 Claim Settlement Paid by Check
# 101502
04/24/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 100.00
Account 6600.090 - Other Charges Claims, Judgments, Damages Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $100.00 Account 6600.460 - Other Charges Legal Notices & Pub
10420 - Monterey County Weekly 246-090198-
00002
Imjin Parkway
Widening Project Ad
Paid by Check
# 101484
12/15/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 1,953.00
Account 6600.460 - Other Charges Legal Notices & Pub Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,953.00 Account 6600.490 - Other Charges Membership Prof Orgs
10050 - ASCAP 100006019362 Citywide Music
Licensing - 2023
Paid by Check
# 101466
12/20/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 420.00
Account 6600.490 - Other Charges Membership Prof Orgs Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $420.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $8,780.96 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $8,780.96 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $8,780.96 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 3 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
27 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10107 - California Towing & Transport 204364 City of Marina Paid by Check # 101470
11/28/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 100.00
10107 - California Towing & Transport 204636 City of Marina Paid by Check # 101470
11/28/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 100.00
10326 - Language Line, LLC 10683695 Acct #9020101064 Paid by Check # 101477
11/30/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 504.39
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8002365041 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101493
09/18/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 152.15
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8002164725 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101493
08/18/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 1,380.04
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8001976122 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101493
07/18/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 304.30
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8001778920 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101493
06/18/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 304.30
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8001583290 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101493
05/18/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 152.15
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8001382692 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101493
04/18/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 152.15
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8001179645 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101493
03/18/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 152.15
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8000985066 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101493
02/18/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 152.15
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8002560790 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101493
10/18/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 152.15
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8002959500 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101493
12/18/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 152.15
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 13 $3,758.08 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9921436297 Acct #371782403-
00002
Paid by Check
# 101498
11/25/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 01/06/2023 883.46
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9920838170 Acct #272493672-
00001
Paid by Check
# 101498
11/18/2022 12/12/2022 12/12/2022 01/06/2023 4,881.50
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $5,764.96 Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 10416 - Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
29648A-IN Regular Ethenol Paid by Check
# 101483
12/16/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 3,397.86
11324 - Wex Bank (former Chevron Fuel
Cards)
85128790 Acct #0496-00-52150-
7 Paid by EFT #
2830
11/23/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 441.42
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $3,839.28 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 4 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
28 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10498 - Quill Corporation 29350761 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101491
12/02/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 56.79
10498 - Quill Corporation 29602680 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101491
12/14/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 68.59
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $125.38 Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip
10029 - Altius Medical 18608 Cust #175 Paid by Check
# 101464
12/15/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 93.80
10330 - LC Action 445200 Cust #862 Paid by Check
# 101478
10/27/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 755.99
10330 - LC Action 444677 Cust #862 Paid by Check
# 101478
10/12/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 2,124.28
10330 - LC Action 436235 Cust #862 Paid by Check
# 101478
03/07/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 2,878.68
10330 - LC Action 4524 Cust #862 Paid by Check
# 101478
06/24/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 2,055.16
Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $7,907.91 Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
11778 - Motor Squad Training Institute 22-234-018 Marina Police Dept Paid by Check # 101501
08/12/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 1,200.00
Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,200.00 Account 6600.485 - Other Charges Medical Svc - Investigations 10193 - California Department of Justice 620852 Cust #110312 Paid by Check # 101469
12/05/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 79.00
10008 - Monterey County Department of
Health - EHB
MRN-PD-22-10 City of Marina Paid by Check
# 101482
12/06/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 775.00
10445 - Natividad Medical Center 12-05-22 Marina Police Department
Paid by Check
# 101487
12/05/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 93.00
10445 - Natividad Medical Center 12-07-22 Marina Police Department
Paid by Check
# 101487
12/07/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 124.00
Account 6600.485 - Other Charges Medical Svc - Investigations Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $1,071.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 29 $23,666.61 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 29 $23,666.61 Department 210 - Police Totals Invoice Transactions 29 $23,666.61 Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 10416 - Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
29648A-IN Regular Ethenol Paid by Check
# 101483
12/16/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 268.25
Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 5 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
29 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 10416 - Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
29650A-IN Clear Diesel Paid by Check
# 101483
12/19/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 1,791.69
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $2,059.94 Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
10580 - Tri County Fire Protection HP59928 Extinguisher refills/service
Paid by Check
# 101497
12/14/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 483.00
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $483.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $2,542.94 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $2,542.94 Department 250 - Fire Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $2,542.94 Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 228524 Custodial Service for December
Paid by Check
# 101468
12/22/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 2,886.35
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,886.35 Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0150373 3126 Shoemaker/at Pond
Paid by Check
# 101473
12/15/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 80.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0150444 Preston Park Squirrels Paid by Check # 101473
12/15/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 180.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0150372 120 Seaside Circle Pond/Restrooms
Paid by Check
# 101473
12/15/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 80.00
Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $340.00 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056045
122122
3100 Preston Drive Paid by Check
# 101480
12/21/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 171.02
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056046
122122
3100 Preston Drive Paid by Check
# 101480
12/21/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 150.82
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056094
122122
2660 5th Ave Paid by Check
# 101480
12/21/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 426.66
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056061
122122
Reservation/Locke
Paddon Park
Paid by Check
# 101480
12/21/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 86.07
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $834.57 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 6 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
30 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 10416 - Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
29648A-IN Regular Ethenol Paid by Check
# 101483
12/16/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 134.12
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $134.12 Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110139267 PW Uniforms Paid by Check # 101465
12/28/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 130.97
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $130.97 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $4,326.01 Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $4,326.01 Division 313 - Vehicle Maint
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies
10403 - NAPA Auto Parts - former Monterey
Auto Supply
4006-953374 2007 Ford Ranger
Building
Paid by Check
# 101486
12/20/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 83.69
10403 - NAPA Auto Parts - former Monterey
Auto Supply
953339 Oil Filters Paid by Check
# 101486
12/20/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 44.71
Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $128.40 Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
10448 - Newton Bros. Tire & Auto 438028 PD Paid by Check # 101488
12/21/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 468.45
Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $468.45 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $596.85 Division 313 - Vehicle Maint Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $596.85 Department 310 - Public Works Totals Invoice Transactions 13 $4,922.86 Department 410 - Planning
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.610 - Prof Svc Planning - Consultant
10508 - Regional Government Services 14372 Contract Services for Planning - November
2022
Paid by EFT #
2827
11/30/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 1,406.85
Account 6300.610 - Prof Svc Planning - Consultant Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,406.85 Account 6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning
10508 - Regional Government Services 14258 Marina Dunes October 2022
Paid by EFT #
2827
10/31/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 14,497.40
Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 7 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
31 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 410 - Planning
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning
10508 - Regional Government Services 14373 Marina Quick Quack Car Wash - November
2022
Paid by EFT #
2827
11/30/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 840.68
Account 6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $15,338.08 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9922578828 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by Check
# 101498
12/10/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 01/06/2023 50.58
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $50.58 Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 10416 - Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
29648A-IN Regular Ethenol Paid by Check
# 101483
12/16/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 89.42
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $89.42 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10732 - Office Depot-General Account 282759140001 Marina Community Partners LLC The
Dunes
Paid by Check
# 101489
12/22/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 74.78
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $74.78 Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping
11779 - Alyson Hunter 122222 AH Purchase of maps
for Cypress Knolls
Public Workshop on
1/7/23
Paid by Check
# 101500
12/22/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 651.89
Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $651.89 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $17,611.60 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $17,611.60 Department 410 - Planning Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $17,611.60 Department 420 - Engineering
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection 10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates 22093766 Dunes 2nd Ave Paid by Check # 101476
07/31/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 4,579.50
Account 6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $4,579.50 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $4,579.50 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $4,579.50 Department 420 - Engineering Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $4,579.50 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 8 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
32 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 510 - Recreation & Culture
Division 100 - Admin
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10153 - Comcast 12-14-22 Acc# 8155 10 029
0106172
Paid by Check
# 101472
12/14/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 142.69
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9923189049 Cell Phone Charges for Recreation Department
- December 2022
Paid by Check
# 101498
12/17/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 203.20
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $345.89 Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 10416 - Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
29648A-IN Regular Ethenol Paid by Check
# 101483
12/16/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 223.54
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $223.54 Account 6600.740 - Other Charges Special Event
10301 - Janice Griffin 12-16-22 Youth Special Event -
Christmas Party
Paid by Check
# 101475
12/13/2022 01/03/2023 01/03/2023 01/06/2023 400.00
Account 6600.740 - Other Charges Special Event Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $400.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $969.43 Division 100 - Admin Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $969.43 Department 510 - Recreation & Culture Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $969.43 Fund 100 - General Fund Totals Invoice Transactions 86 $321,729.58 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 9 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
33 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 220 - Gas Tax
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 2022 533-8 PG&E - 2253666533-8 Paid by Check # 101490
12/16/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 286.88
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 2022 483-6 PG&E - 3982644483-6 Paid by Check # 101490
12/14/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 13,624.07
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 2022 362-9 PG&E - 5996678362-9 Paid by Check # 101490
12/18/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 249.67
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 2022 683-2 PG&E 6217294683-2 Paid by Check # 101490
12/16/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 1,018.58
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $15,179.20 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056027
121522
Calif Ave at Reindollar Paid by Check
# 101480
12/15/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 36.77
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056007
121522
Calif Ave/North of 3rd Paid by Check
# 101480
12/15/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 89.02
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $125.79 Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 10416 - Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
29648A-IN Regular Ethenol Paid by Check
# 101483
12/16/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 134.13
10416 - Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
29650A-IN Clear Diesel Paid by Check
# 101483
12/19/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 882.47
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,016.60 Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110139270 Shop Supplies Paid by Check # 101465
12/28/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 62.36
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $62.36 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 9 $16,383.95 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 9 $16,383.95 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 9 $16,383.95 Fund 220 - Gas Tax Totals Invoice Transactions 9 $16,383.95 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 10 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
34 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 251 - CFD - Locke Paddon
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 2022 272-1 PG&E - 2862559272-1 Paid by Check # 101490
12/16/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 63.12
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $63.12 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $63.12 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $63.12 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $63.12 Fund 251 - CFD - Locke Paddon Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $63.12 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 11 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
35 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 460 - Airport Capital Projects
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58162 Airport Fuel Farm
100LL Tank
Replacement
Paid by Check
# 101499
12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 01/06/2023 7,743.75
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58206 Airport B533 Exterior CM
Paid by Check
# 101499
12/21/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 01/06/2023 951.38
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $8,695.13 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $8,695.13 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $8,695.13 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $8,695.13 Fund 460 - Airport Capital Projects Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $8,695.13 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 12 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
36 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 462 - City Capital Projects
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates 22093765 2021 Dev Impact Fee Paid by Check # 101476
07/31/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 10,476.00
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates 23298347 2021 Dev Impact Fee Paid by Check # 101476
11/30/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 1,026.50
10515 - Rincon Consultants, Inc. 44614 Marina DVSP Paid by EFT # 2829
01/19/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 7,972.00
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58249 California Ave
Pedestrian Crossing
Construction
Management
Paid by Check
# 101499
12/21/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 1,373.75
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58233 MLK Sculpture Paid by Check # 101499
12/21/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 2,355.00
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58234 MLK Sculpture CDs Paid by Check # 101499
12/21/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 9,450.93
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58232 Sea Haven City Park Paid by Check # 101499
12/21/2022 12/21/2022 12/21/2022 01/06/2023 1,239.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $33,893.18 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $33,893.18 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $33,893.18 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $33,893.18 Fund 462 - City Capital Projects Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $33,893.18 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 13 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
37 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building
10427 - Monterey Regional Waste
Management District
3737107 Airport Run Paid by Check
# 101485
12/21/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 01/06/2023 66.50
10427 - Monterey Regional Waste
Management District
3736668 Airport Run Paid by Check
# 101485
12/20/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 01/06/2023 59.50
Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $126.00 Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General
10154 - Commercial Environment
Landscape
2796-1222 Marina Airport Medians Paid by EFT #
2826
12/19/2022 12/20/2022 12/20/2022 01/06/2023 2,900.00
Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,900.00 Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Dec 2022 683-2 PG&E 6217294683-2 Paid by Check # 101490
12/16/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 90.86
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $90.86 Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 10416 - Monterey County Petroleum-Sturdy
Oil Co.
29648A-IN Regular Ethenol Paid by Check
# 101483
12/16/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/06/2023 134.13
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $134.13 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $3,250.99 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $3,250.99 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $3,250.99 Fund 555 - Marina Airport Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $3,250.99 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 14 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
38 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 556 - Preston Park NonProfit Corp
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit
11476 - Chavan & Associates LLP 17611 City Audit Service Paid by Check # 101471
11/06/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/06/2023 2,325.00
Account 6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,325.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,325.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,325.00 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,325.00 Fund 556 - Preston Park NonProfit Corp Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,325.00 Grand Totals Invoice Transactions 111 $386,340.95
Run by Rogah Satof on 01/05/2023 12:29:29 PM Page 15 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/06/23 - 01/06/23
39 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11714 - Advisian, Inc. - Worley Group, Inc. 408522 Professional Services - MPWSP - September
2022
Paid by Check
# 101565
10/14/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 11,513.75
11714 - Advisian, Inc. - Worley Group, Inc. 414174 Professional Services - MPWSP - Sept.-
October 2022
Paid by Check
# 101565
11/08/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 9,500.00
10335 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 203719 LCW - Professional Services
Paid by Check
# 101531
08/31/2021 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 632.00
11735 - Michael Josselyn 07-31-22-
August
Professional Services -
MPWSP - August 2022
Paid by Check
# 101535
07/31/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 3,750.00
11033 - Sara Steck Myers 01-01-23 Professional Services - MPWSP - December
2022
Paid by EFT #
2856
01/01/2023 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 3,090.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $28,485.75 Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
11783 - City of Pacific Grove 12-16-22 MBAMG December 16, 2022 Luncheon-
Meeting
Paid by Check
# 101518
12/16/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 49.59
Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $49.59 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $28,535.34 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $28,535.34 Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $28,535.34 Department 125 - I. T.

Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.330 - Prof Svc IT - Information Tech Svc
10897 - TechRx Technology Services 10665 IT Support - December 2022
Paid by Check
# 101563
01/01/2023 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 8,160.00
Account 6300.330 - Prof Svc IT - Information Tech Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $8,160.00 Account 6360.076 - Maint & Repairs Copier
10406 - Monterey Bay Systems 439273 City Hall Copier
Maintenance Contract -
Jan-Apr 2023
Paid by Check
# 101537
01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 607.45
10592 - U.S. Bank Equipment Finance-
USbancorp
490774486 CDD Copier Lease -
January 2023
Paid by Check
# 101552
12/30/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 216.32
Account 6360.076 - Maint & Repairs Copier Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $823.77 Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint 10897 - TechRx Technology Services 10644 Ninite Monthly Subscription - January
2023
Paid by Check
# 101563
01/01/2023 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 112.50
Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 1 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
40 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 125 - I. T.

Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint 10897 - TechRx Technology Services 10645 Veeam Virtual Backup Monthly Subscription -
January 2023
Paid by Check
# 101563
01/01/2023 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 380.00
Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $492.50 Account 6360.345 - Maint & Repairs Citywide Microsoft Ofc Upgrade 10897 - TechRx Technology Services 10592 Citywide MS Office 365 - December 2022
Paid by Check
# 101563
12/01/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 1,782.60
Account 6360.345 - Maint & Repairs Citywide Microsoft Ofc Upgrade Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,782.60 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $11,258.87 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $11,258.87 Department 125 - I. T. Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $11,258.87 Department 130 - Finance
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.350 - Material & Suppl IT-Computer & Hardware (non-cap) 10897 - TechRx Technology Services 10622 New Laptop for Assis.Fin.Director
Paid by Check
# 101563
12/31/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 2,068.54
Account 6400.350 - Material & Suppl IT-Computer & Hardware (non-cap) Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,068.54 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,068.54 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,068.54 Department 130 - Finance Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,068.54 Department 150 - City Attorney
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc 11718 - Noland, Hamerly, Etienne & Hoss 226741 Attorney Services - Nov-Dec 2022 -
Multiple Subjects
Paid by Check
# 101543
12/28/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 42,633.60
11753 - Fenton & Keller PC 129797 Professional Services - Cardroom Ordinance -
November 2022
Paid by Check
# 101520
11/10/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/13/2023 1,417.50
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $44,051.10 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $44,051.10 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $44,051.10 Department 150 - City Attorney Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $44,051.10 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 2 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
41 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10129 - Cintas Corporation 4142671962 Payer# 16673534 Paid by Check # 101516
01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 43.72
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $43.72 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019270535 CALNET3-9391023437 (384-0425)
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/28/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 51.63
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019270538 CALNET3-9391023440 (384-0860)
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/28/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 26.65
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019270539 CALNET3-9391023441 (384-0888)
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/28/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 26.65
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019270563 CALNET3-9391023463 (384-7854)
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/28/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 26.65
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019270566 CALNET3-9391023466 (384-8477)
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/28/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 51.63
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019270568 CALNET3-9391023468 (384-9148)
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/28/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 26.65
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019268689 CALNET3-9391023471 (582-0100)
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/27/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 55.95
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019268695 CALNET3-9391023477 (582-9803)
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/27/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 26.65
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $292.46 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056020
121522
304 Hillcrest Ave Paid by Check
# 101533
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 111.02
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056018
121522
208 Palm Ave Paid by Check
# 101533
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 153.37
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056017
121522
208-A Palm Ave Paid by Check
# 101533
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 80.86
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $345.25 Account 6600.010 - Other Charges Alarm
10239 - First Alarm 725818 Remote Access New
Code Entry - City Hall
Paid by EFT #
2855
12/21/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 35.00
10239 - First Alarm 725817 Remote Access New
Code Entry - City Hall
Paid by EFT #
2855
12/21/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 35.00
Account 6600.010 - Other Charges Alarm Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $70.00 Account 6600.450 - Other Charges Leases & Rents
10579 - Transportation Agency of Monterey
County
TAMC Jan 2023 Handcart Lease Pymt Paid by Check
# 101550
01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 8,858.00
Account 6600.450 - Other Charges Leases & Rents Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $8,858.00 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 3 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
42 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6600.452 - Other Charges Leased Copier
11451 - Monterey Bay Office Products - US
Bank
491188074 City Hall Copier Lease
Payment - January
2023
Paid by Check
# 101536
01/04/2023 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 380.20
Account 6600.452 - Other Charges Leased Copier Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $380.20 Account 6600.630 - Other Charges Promotional Activities 11784 - John Upshaw John Upshaw - DJ
MOnterey
12-28-22 MLK Groundbreaking
Ceremony DJ Services
Paid by Check
# 101558
12/28/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 300.00
Account 6600.630 - Other Charges Promotional Activities Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $300.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 17 $10,289.63 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 17 $10,289.63 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 17 $10,289.63 Department 195 - Conveyance
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General
10446 - New Image Landscape Co. 140815 Landscape
Maintenance December
2022
Paid by Check
# 101542
12/31/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 2,140.00
Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,140.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,140.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,140.00 Department 195 - Conveyance Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,140.00 Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10865 - Hayon Inc. (University Chevron
Marina)
03-2022PD Marina Police
Department
Paid by Check
# 101574
10/04/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 450.00
10326 - Language Line, LLC 10706051 Acct #9020101064 Paid by Check # 101575
12/31/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 314.64
10334 - Lexis Nexis Risk Solutions 1308841-
20221130
Billing ID #1308841 Paid by Check
# 101576
11/30/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 150.00
10342 - Monterey County Peace Officers
Association-MCPOA
2022090R Marina 2022 Paid by Check
# 101578
01/02/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 1,050.00
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc. 8002761672 Cust #1000200361 Paid by Check # 101580
11/18/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 152.15
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $2,116.79 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 4 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
43 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 228525 Janitorial Service - Police/Fire/Airport
December 2022
Paid by Check
# 101510
12/22/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 1,308.34
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,308.34 Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10129 - Cintas Corporation 4141405033 Mat Service -
Police/Fire 12/23/22
Paid by Check
# 101516
12/23/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 37.59
10592 - U.S. Bank Equipment Finance-
USbancorp
490334380 Customer Credit Acct
#598296
Paid by Check
# 101583
12/27/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 2,582.28
10627 - Zoom Imaging Solutions IN3160157 Acct # SOS-CIT-1600-Z - City of Marina PD
Paid by Check
# 101585
12/22/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 643.96
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $3,263.83 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9923220371 Acct #272493672-
00001
Paid by Check
# 101584
12/18/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 2,375.86
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,375.86 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10053 - AT & T 12-21-22 Acct #051 935-4017
001
Paid by Check
# 101568
12/21/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 96.37
10053 - AT & T 12-01-22 Acct #248 134-7275
428 0
Paid by Check
# 101568
12/01/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 18.51
10053 - AT & T 01-01-2023 Acct #248 134-7275
428 0
Paid by Check
# 101568
01/01/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 47.06
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019220961 BAN #9391023478 Paid by Check # 101569
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 51.63
10057 - Avaya, Inc. 2734636866 Acct #0100828859 Paid by EFT # 2872
12/04/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 12.49
10374 - Maynard Group Inc. IN2033010 Acct #AC3746 Paid by Check # 101577
01/01/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 661.13
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $887.19 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 014874000
103122
289 12th Street Paid by Check
# 101533
10/31/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 126.13
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 014874000
113022
289 12th Street Paid by Check
# 101533
11/30/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 126.13
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 014874000
123022
289 12th Street Paid by Check
# 101533
12/30/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 138.74
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 014874000
063022
289 12th Street Paid by Check
# 101533
06/30/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 130.85
Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 5 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
44 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 014874000
072922
289 12th Street Paid by Check
# 101533
07/29/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 126.13
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 014874000
083122
289 12th Street Paid by Check
# 101533
08/31/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 126.13
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 014874000
092922
289 12th Street Paid by Check
# 101533
09/29/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 130.85
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $904.96 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10498 - Quill Corporation 27992375 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101547
09/27/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 43.68
10498 - Quill Corporation 29604752 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101547
12/14/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 53.52
10498 - Quill Corporation 29608845 Acct # 7474999 Paid by Check # 101547
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 9.28
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $106.48 Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping
10235 - FedEx 9-641-46768 Acct #3995-9218-6 Paid by Check # 101573
12/23/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 3.65
10235 - FedEx 7-971-98415 Acct #3995-9218-6 Paid by Check # 101573
12/09/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 50.05
10235 - FedEx 9-640-99171 Acct #3995-9218-6 Paid by Check # 101573
12/16/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 6.51
Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $60.21 Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip
10304 - Johnson Associates 494414 PD Truck 826 Paid by Check # 101529
12/20/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 463.06
10727 - Ace Hardware-Public Safety 084069 Cust #116 Paid by Check # 101566
01/06/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 15.27
10309 - Salinas Valley Pro Squad 474 Marina PD - Rose Paid by Check # 101579
12/01/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 362.67
10309 - Salinas Valley Pro Squad 464 Marina PD - Rocha Paid by Check # 101579
11/11/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 180.25
10309 - Salinas Valley Pro Squad 457 Marina PD - Santana Paid by Check # 101579
10/10/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 77.56
10309 - Salinas Valley Pro Squad 463 Marina PD - Dhillon Paid by Check # 101579
11/11/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 335.35
Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $1,434.16 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 6 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
45 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
10753 - Ace High Designs Inc. 50813 Cust #01956 Paid by Check # 101567
12/20/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 54.63
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $54.63 Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
10140 - City Of Marina Petty Cash Petty Cash 1/23 Replenish Petty Cash Paid by Check # 101517
01/15/2023 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 1,120.00
11768 - Ivan Santana 01-04-23 DO NOT MAIL, PER
DIEM - Santana
Paid by Check
# 101586
01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 140.00
11781 - K’Shante Dela Cuadra - Employee 01-04-23 DO NOT MAIL, PER DIEM - K. Dela Cuadra
Paid by Check
# 101587
01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 253.00
11782 - Kimberly Ruelas - Employee 01-04-23 DO NOT MAIL, PER DIEM - Ruelas
Paid by Check
# 101588
01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 115.00
11760 - Rachel Shimabukuro 01-04-23 DO NOT MAIL, PER
DIEM - Shimabukuro
Paid by Check
# 101589
01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 115.00
10935 - South Bay Regional Public Safety
Training Cons.
223323 Radar/Lidar Course
11/14-11/17/22 - Dela
Cuadra, Dhillon, Rose
Paid by Check
# 101581
12/08/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 315.00
Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $2,058.00 Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
10140 - City Of Marina Petty Cash Petty Cash 1/23 Replenish Petty Cash Paid by Check # 101517
01/15/2023 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 483.00
Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $483.00 Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking
10253 - George T. Powell 01012023 Parking Rental Fees Paid by Check # 101523
01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 997.00
Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $997.00 Account 6600.465 - Other Charges Live Scan
10193 - California Department of Justice 626795 Cust #110312 Paid by Check # 101570
01/05/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 237.00
Account 6600.465 - Other Charges Live Scan Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $237.00 Account 6600.485 - Other Charges Medical Svc - Investigations 10776 - Central Valley Toxicology 324007 Marina Police Department
Paid by Check
# 101571
11/04/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 85.00
10157 - Community Hospital of the
Monterey Peninsula
12-08-22 Guarantor #12252 -
Nov 2022
Paid by Check
# 101572
12/08/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 27.00
Account 6600.485 - Other Charges Medical Svc - Investigations Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $112.00 Account 6600.780 - Other Charges Transcription Svc
10544 - SpeakWrite a2eb236a City of Marina CA Police
Dept Billing Acct
Paid by Check
# 101582
01/01/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 579.23
Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 7 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
46 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6600.780 - Other Charges Transcription Svc
10544 - SpeakWrite 5daa634e City of Marina CA Police
Dept BIlling Acct
Paid by Check
# 101582
12/01/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 480.86
Account 6600.780 - Other Charges Transcription Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,060.09 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 49 $17,459.54 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 49 $17,459.54 Department 210 - Police Totals Invoice Transactions 49 $17,459.54 Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122517 Plan registration and
inspection at 479
Marina Heights Drive
Paid by Check
# 101514
01/16/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 200.00
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122518 Plan check and
inspection for 495
Lassen Way
Paid by Check
# 101514
12/16/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 200.00
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122519 Plan check and
inspection at 481
Marina Heights Drive
Paid by Check
# 101514
12/16/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 200.00
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122522 Plan check and
inspection for 174 Via
Del Mar Lot 7
Paid by Check
# 101514
12/17/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 200.00
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122521 Plan check and
inspection for 176 Via
Del Mar Lot 6
Paid by Check
# 101514
12/17/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 200.00
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122520 Plan check and
inspection for 178 Via
Del Mar Lot 5
Paid by Check
# 101514
12/17/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 200.00
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122524 Plan check and
inspection for 170 Via
Del Mar Lot 9
Paid by Check
# 101514
12/17/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 200.00
10841 - Carmel Fire Protection Associates -
Art Black
122523 Plan check and
inspection for 172 Via
Del Mar Lot 8
Paid by Check
# 101514
12/17/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 200.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $1,600.00 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 8 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
47 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 228525 Janitorial Service - Police/Fire/Airport
December 2022
Paid by Check
# 101510
12/22/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 516.66
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $516.66 Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10129 - Cintas Corporation 4141405033 Mat Service -
Police/Fire 12/23/22
Paid by Check
# 101516
12/23/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 117.48
10623 - Xerox Financial Services 3698226 Acct: 010-0066774-001 FD Monthly Copier Fees
Paid by Check
# 101557
12/28/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 264.61
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $382.09 Account 6360.680 - Maint & Repairs Radio Equip
10221 - Emergency Vehicle Specialists 14547 Installed truck vault on unit 5400.

Paid by EFT #
2853
01/05/2023 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 1,120.00
Account 6360.680 - Maint & Repairs Radio Equip Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,120.00 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10018 - Advantage Gear 59533-1 Shipping charges for
uniform
Paid by Check
# 101561
12/20/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 17.16
10586 - United Parcel Service 00008Y4481522 Acct#: 8Y4481 Shipping fees to
Advantage Gear
Paid by Check
# 101553
12/24/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 15.46
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $32.62 Account 6400.739 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Exp-Fire Prevent 10085 - Burton's Fire, Inc. W 80903 New engine - install firecom wireless
intercom, interface
radio
Paid by Check
# 101511
12/05/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 11,992.06
Account 6400.739 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Exp-Fire Prevent Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $11,992.06 Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
10927 - Ace Hardware - Fire Dept. 083984 Spark plug for chainsaw on engine
Paid by Check
# 101504
12/26/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 6.54
11393 - Carmel Roasters, Inc. 65687 FD Coffee - 4 boxes Paid by Check # 101515
11/27/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 349.60
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $356.14 Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
10140 - City Of Marina Petty Cash Petty Cash 1/23 Replenish Petty Cash Paid by Check # 101517
01/15/2023 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 92.00
Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 9 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
48 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
11720 - Helping Hands Health Education,
LLC
341 BLS Provider cards for
S. DeVincenzi, G. Sales
& B. Bredeson
Paid by Check
# 101527
12/13/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 33.00
Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $125.00 Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking
10253 - George T. Powell 01012023 Parking Rental Fees Paid by Check # 101523
01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 303.00
Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $303.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 20 $16,427.57 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 20 $16,427.57 Department 250 - Fire Totals Invoice Transactions 20 $16,427.57 Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083820 Key Storage Paid by Check # 101505
12/07/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 49.15
10952 - MuttMitt - ZW USA Inc. 524636 City Parks Paid by Check # 101564
01/06/2023 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 1,196.14
10560 - Suburban Propane 1602-127729 Propane and
transportation 167.3
Gallons
Paid by Check
# 101549
11/25/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 721.34
10580 - Tri County Fire Protection HP58644 Maintenance Paid by Check # 101551
07/07/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 88.00
10140 - City Of Marina Petty Cash Petty Cash 1/23 Replenish Petty Cash Paid by Check # 101517
01/15/2023 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 250.00
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $2,304.63 Account 6360.070 - Maint & Repairs Bdg Public Safety
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 084073 Shower Paid by Check # 101505
01/06/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 1.08
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 084070 PD Paid by Check # 101505
01/06/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 16.15
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 084043 WC Office Paid by Check # 101505
01/04/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 72.06
Account 6360.070 - Maint & Repairs Bdg Public Safety Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $89.29 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 10 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
49 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.315 - Maint & Repairs HVAC
10187 - Della Mora Heating, Inc. 15330 Rtu Not Heating Paid by Check # 101519
12/27/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 400.00
Account 6360.315 - Maint & Repairs HVAC Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $400.00 Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 084037 Tools Paid by Check # 101505
01/03/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 7.64
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 084035 Storm Damage Paid by Check # 101505
01/03/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 25.12
Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $32.76 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056006
122122
188 Seaside Circle Paid by Check
# 101533
12/21/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 47.72
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056042
122122
3040 Lake Drive Paid by Check
# 101533
12/21/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 110.92
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056090
122122
Locke Paddon Park Paid by Check
# 101533
12/21/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 60.52
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056019
121522
211 Hillcrest Ave Paid by Check
# 101533
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 1,026.63
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056001
121522
209-13 Cypress Ave Paid by Check
# 101533
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 102.85
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056099
123022
9th Street West of 2nd
Avenue
Paid by Check
# 101533
12/30/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 171.02
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056100
123022
9th Street (Irrigation)
Parcels L&M
Paid by Check
# 101533
12/30/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 264.17
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $1,783.83 Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110143433 PW Uniforms Paid by Check # 101507
01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 130.97
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110093073 PW Uniforms Paid by Check # 101507
10/12/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 129.79
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110097280 PW Uniforms Paid by Check # 101507
10/19/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 129.79
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110101524 PW Uniforms Paid by Check # 101507
10/26/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 129.79
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110110690 PW Uniforms Paid by Check # 101507
11/09/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 285.62
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $805.96 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 23 $5,416.47 Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds Totals Invoice Transactions 23 $5,416.47 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 11 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
50 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 313 - Vehicle Maint
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies
10292 - Interstate Battery 120125178 Batteries Paid by Check # 101528
12/07/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 733.20
10403 - NAPA Auto Parts - former Monterey
Auto Supply
956315 PD Brakes Paid by Check
# 101541
01/06/2023 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 458.13
Account 6360.690 - Maint & Repairs Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,191.33 Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
10221 - Emergency Vehicle Specialists 14587 2022 Ford F-150 PW Paid by EFT # 2853
11/30/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 3,991.98
10527 - Safety-Kleen Corp. 90532502 Oil Paid by Check
# 101548
12/19/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 145.00
Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $4,136.98 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $5,328.31 Division 313 - Vehicle Maint Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $5,328.31 Department 310 - Public Works Totals Invoice Transactions 27 $10,744.78 Department 410 - Planning
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.352 - Material & Suppl IT - Software (non-capitalize) 10046 - ARC (Former San Jose Blue) 2654327 ARC Paid by Check # 101508
12/21/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 282.96
Account 6400.352 - Material & Suppl IT - Software (non-capitalize) Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $282.96 Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping
11779 - Alyson Hunter 011123 A. Hunter
Reimbursement
Paid by Check
# 101506
01/11/2023 01/11/2023 01/11/2023 01/13/2023 69.88
Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $69.88 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $352.84 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $352.84 Department 410 - Planning Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $352.84 Department 430 - Building Inspection
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9923298615 PW Verizon Phone Bill (972476364-0001)
Paid by Check
# 101555
12/18/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 40.42
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $40.42 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 12 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
51 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 430 - Building Inspection
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10734 - Office Depot-Public Works Dept. 283975192001 Office Supplies Paid by Check # 101544
12/16/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 94.14
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $94.14 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $134.56 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $134.56 Department 430 - Building Inspection Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $134.56 Department 440 - Economic Dev
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6600.497 - Other Charges Membership MCCVB
10378 - Monterey County Convention &
Visitors Bureau
16280 Jurisdiction Investment
- FY 22-23 Q3 - Jan-
Mar 2023
Paid by Check
# 101539
01/01/2023 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 20,500.00
Account 6600.497 - Other Charges Membership MCCVB Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $20,500.00 Account 6600.630 - Other Charges Promotional Activities 11620 - Certified Folder Display Service,
Inc.
599725 Distribution of
Restaurant Guides -
January 2023
Paid by EFT #
2851
01/01/2023 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 298.58
Account 6600.630 - Other Charges Promotional Activities Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $298.58 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $20,798.58 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $20,798.58 Department 440 - Economic Dev Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $20,798.58 Fund 100 - General Fund Totals Invoice Transactions 135 $164,261.35 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 13 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
52 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 110 - Vehicle and Equipment
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6600.450 - Other Charges Leases & Rents
11491 - Enterprise FM Trust - Fleet Lease
payments only
FBN4646866 Lease Payment/January
23 Paid by EFT #
2854
01/05/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 22,612.83
Account 6600.450 - Other Charges Leases & Rents Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $22,612.83 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $22,612.83 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $22,612.83 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $22,612.83 Fund 110 - Vehicle and Equipment Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $22,612.83 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 14 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
53 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 220 - Gas Tax
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9923298615 PW Verizon Phone Bill (972476364-0001)
Paid by Check
# 101555
12/18/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 422.08
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $422.08 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056028
122122
California at Jerry Ct Paid by Check
# 101533
12/21/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 36.77
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056040
122122
Hilo Ave Paid by Check
# 101533
12/21/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 27.26
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056024
121522
Del Monte/Palm Paid by Check
# 101533
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 89.02
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056016
121522
Resev Rd & Seacrest
Ave-Next to Fire Hyd
Paid by Check
# 101533
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 39.33
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056021
121522
Reservation Rd/By 290-
308 Reservation
Paid by Check
# 101533
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 36.77
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056022
121522
Reser/Marina Auto
Stereo/Irrigation
Paid by Check
# 101533
12/15/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 36.77
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056036
123022
2nd Ave/Divarty &
Intergarrison
Paid by Check
# 101533
12/30/2022 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 185.03
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056037
123022
2nd Ave Paid by Check
# 101533
12/30/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 171.02
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 000056095
123022
2nd Ave Paid by Check
# 101533
12/30/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 227.41
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 9 $849.38 Account 6400.750 - Material & Suppl Street Material (non-capitalize) 10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110093079 Shop Supplies Paid by Check # 101507
10/12/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 70.51
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110097284 Shop Supplies Paid by Check # 101507
10/19/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 62.36
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110101531 Shop Supplies Paid by Check # 101507
10/26/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 62.36
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110110691 Shop Supplies Paid by Check # 101507
11/09/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 62.36
10261 - Graniterock/Pavex Construction 2068777 Granitepatch Paid by Check # 101524
12/24/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 1,180.59
Account 6400.750 - Material & Suppl Street Material (non-capitalize) Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $1,438.18 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 15 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
54 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 220 - Gas Tax
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
10043 - Aramark Uniform Service 5110143438 Shop Supplies Paid by Check # 101507
01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 62.36
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $62.36 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 16 $2,772.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 16 $2,772.00 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 16 $2,772.00 Fund 220 - Gas Tax Totals Invoice Transactions 16 $2,772.00 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 16 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
55 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 223 - FORA Dissolution
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11755 - Unlimited Environmental, Inc. 22-071-4 CK Blight Removal Paid by EFT # 2857
01/04/2023 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 336,955.50
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58250 Blight Removal 2022 Paid by Check # 101556
12/21/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/13/2023 34,411.38
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58274 Program Management Paid by Check # 101556
12/21/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 1,914.64
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $373,281.52 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $373,281.52 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $373,281.52 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $373,281.52 Fund 223 - FORA Dissolution Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $373,281.52 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 17 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
56 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 251 - CFD - Locke Paddon
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District 012016000
122122
199 A Paddon Place Paid by Check
# 101533
12/21/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 36.77
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $36.77 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $36.77 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $36.77 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $36.77 Fund 251 - CFD - Locke Paddon Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $36.77 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 18 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
57 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 422 - Capital Projects - Measure X
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11711 - Precision Grade Inc. 163 Annual Street
Resurfacing
Paid by Check
# 101546
01/05/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 88,102.69
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58274 Program Management Paid by Check # 101556
12/21/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 7,149.38
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $95,252.07 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $95,252.07 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $95,252.07 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $95,252.07 Fund 422 - Capital Projects - Measure X Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $95,252.07 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 19 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
58 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 462 - City Capital Projects
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11037 - Don Chapin Company, Inc. 75650 Streetlight
Replacement
Paid by EFT #
2852
11/30/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 137,768.62
10831 - Kompan, Inc. INV114485 Sea Haven Park Marina
Heights
Paid by Check
# 101562
01/06/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 765,175.86
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58205 Glorya Jean Tate Pump Track & Restroom
Improvements
Paid by Check
# 101556
12/21/2022 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 01/13/2023 10,613.40
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58274 Program Management Paid by Check # 101556
12/21/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 6,526.50
10046 - ARC (Former San Jose Blue) 2657442 Imjin Parkway Widening Project Plans
Paid by Check
# 101508
01/03/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 2,871.61
10046 - ARC (Former San Jose Blue) 2657651 Imjin Parkway Widening Specifications
Paid by Check
# 101508
01/04/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 833.86
11278 - M3 Environmental Consulting, LLC 2241101 Aquatic Center Paid by Check # 101532
12/15/2022 01/10/2023 01/10/2023 01/13/2023 5,170.00
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric 0008161902-5 EP Imjin Parkway Paid by Check # 101545
01/10/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 2,000.00
11266 - Verde Design, Inc. 5-2121701 Dunes Park
Development Project
Paid by Check
# 101554
01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 5,023.69
11456 - William A. Thayer Construction, Inc 220552-0109 Marina Library Audio- Visual
Paid by EFT #
2858
01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/09/2023 01/13/2023 3,296.48
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $939,280.02 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $939,280.02 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $939,280.02 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $939,280.02 Fund 462 - City Capital Projects Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $939,280.02 Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 20 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
59 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc 11718 - Noland, Hamerly, Etienne & Hoss 226741 Attorney Services - Nov-Dec 2022 -
Multiple Subjects
Paid by Check
# 101543
12/28/2022 01/06/2023 01/06/2023 01/13/2023 8,116.95
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $8,116.95 Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 58275 Airport Project
Management
Paid by Check
# 101556
12/21/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 1,650.25
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,650.25 Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083925 Airport Paid by Check # 101505
12/19/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 10.91
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083922 Airport Paid by Check # 101505
12/19/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 40.39
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 083891 Airport Paid by Check # 101505
12/14/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 17.46
10237 - Ferguson Enterprise , Inc. # 1423 0346076 Airport Paid by Check # 101521
12/19/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 70.06
10237 - Ferguson Enterprise , Inc. # 1423 0352783 Airport Paid by Check # 101521
12/21/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 108.11
10427 - Monterey Regional Waste
Management District
3737429 Airport Dump Run Paid by Check
# 101540
12/21/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 10.00
Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $256.93 Account 6360.280 - Maint & Repairs Habitat Management Svc 10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0150106 781 Neeson Rd Bldg 520 Squirrles
Paid by Check
# 101522
12/16/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 1,150.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0150107 781 Neeson Rd Bldg 520 Rodents
Paid by Check
# 101522
12/16/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 75.00
Account 6360.280 - Maint & Repairs Habitat Management Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,225.00 Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 228525 Janitorial Service - Police/Fire/Airport
December 2022
Paid by Check
# 101510
12/22/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 410.00
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $410.00 Account 6360.566 - Maint & Repairs Other Equipment
10264 - Green Rubber-Kennedy AG S-737306 781 Neeson Rd Paid by Check # 101525
12/14/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 16.82
11299 - JR Fencing 8949 Marina Airport Fencing
781 Neeson Rd
Paid by Check
# 101530
01/02/2023 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 4,750.00
10356 - Marina Plumbing 52341 Airport upstairs
restroom
Paid by Check
# 101534
12/27/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 255.00
Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 21 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
60 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.566 - Maint & Repairs Other Equipment
10414 - Monterey County Agricultural
Commissioner
Permit# 1317 Certificate of
Registration
Paid by Check
# 101538
12/19/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 166.60
Account 6360.566 - Maint & Repairs Other Equipment Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $5,188.42 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019270542 Fire Alarms Hangars Bldgs 524 & 533
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/28/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 51.63
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019270541 Fire Alarms Hangar Bldgs 524 & 533
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/28/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 51.63
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000019270547 AWOS Auto Weather
Station
Paid by Check
# 101509
12/28/2022 01/05/2023 01/05/2023 01/13/2023 28.76
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $132.02 Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10603 - Verizon Wireless 9923298615 PW Verizon Phone Bill (972476364-0001)
Paid by Check
# 101555
12/18/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 28.08
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $28.08 Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
10878 - Green Waste Recovery, Inc. 0006474337 Airport Haul Charge Paid by Check # 101526
12/01/2022 01/04/2023 01/04/2023 01/13/2023 584.87
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $584.87 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 20 $17,592.52 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 20 $17,592.52 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 20 $17,592.52 Fund 555 - Marina Airport Totals Invoice Transactions 20 $17,592.52 Grand Totals Invoice Transactions 188 $1,615,089.08
Run by Rogah Satof on 01/12/2023 10:50:21 AM Page 22 of 22 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 01/13/23 - 01/13/23
61 Agenda Item: 10b(1)
City Council Meeting of
January 18, 2023

MINUTES
Tuesday, December 20, 2022 6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR

AGENCY OF THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND MARINA

GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY
Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556 In accordance with California Government Code §54953(e)(1)(A) and (C) and the Proclamation of a State of Emergency issued by Governor Newsom on March 4, 2020, under the provisions of Government Code §8625 rela ted to the COVID -19 (coronavirus) pandemic, consistent with recommendations by State and local health officials regarding social distancing and in order to prevent an imminent risk to the health and safety of attendees as determined in Resolution 2022-134, public participation in City of Marina City Council public meetings shall be electronic only and without a physical location for public participation until the earlier of May 31, 2022, or such time as the City Council may adopt a resolution in a ccordance with Government Code §54953(e)(3). This meeting is being broadcast “live” on Access Media Productions (AMP) Community Television Cable 25 and on the City of Marina Channel and on the internet at https://accessmediaproductions.org/

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISH MENT OF QUORUM: (City Coun cil, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non-Profit Corporation, Pr eston Park Sustainable Communities Nonprofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Forme r Redevelopment Agency Members and Marina Groundwater Sustainability Agency) MEMBERS PRESENT: Liesbeth Vi sscher, Brian McCarthy, Cristina Medina Dirksen, Mayor Pro-Tem/Vice Chair Kathy Biala, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENTS:

4. CLOSED SESSION: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378): NONE

5. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) 1 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, December 20, 2022 Page 2

7. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS:

Council Member Visscher – Attended Dad Reads event at the Marina Library on December 10 th.

Thanked the volunteers who organize this event each month.

Brian McMinn, PW Dir. – Announced the Martin Luther King J r. groundbreaking ceremony on January 16, 2023, at 2:00 pm at the Marina Library.

Council Member Medina Dirksen – Thanked the volunteers of the Winterfest especially our Recreation Department staff. Thanked the Marina Foundation, Dorothy and Steve Emerson for Senior Holiday event.

Layne Long, City Manager – Announced that Marina’s Police Chief, Tina Nieto ’s and Marina’s Commander Edd ie Anderson ’s last active day with the city is Decembe r 20 th and a special recognition will be done at a later date when they can be in attendance.

Mayor Delgado – Announced on January 18th is the Monterey County Public Safety Night at the Salinas Elks Club. Also, thanked the Winterfest volunteers and staff for the work on this event.

Thanked the many volunteers that showed up on December 10th at the Hilltop Park where 700 plants were planted. Thanked the volunteers who continue to help with litter removal along Del Monte Blvd to Lapis Road.

8. PUBLIC COMMENT: Any member of the public may comment on any matter within the City Council ’s jurisdiction that is no t on the agenda. This is t he appro priate pla ce to comment on items on the Consent Age nda. Action will not be taken on items not on the agenda. Comments are limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. General public comment may be limited to thirty (30) minutes and/or continued to the end of the agenda. Any member of the public may comment on any matter listed on this age nda at the time the matter is being considered by the City Council . Whenever possible, written correspondence sh ould be submitted to t he C ouncil in advanc e of the m eeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.
• Denise Turley – Asked if there were any city sponsored Christmas Dinners being offered.

9. CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGE NCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Background information has been provided to the Successor Agency of the former Redevelopment Agency on all matters listed under the Consent Agenda, and these items are considered to be routine and non -controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda are normally approved by one mot ion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of the public or City Council may ask a quest ion or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If dis cussion or a lengthy explanation is required, the Council may remove an ite m from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. If an item is pulled fo r discussion, it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency.

10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be ro utine and non-controversial.

(1) Accounts Payable Check Numbers 101321-101399, totaling $2,148,491.49 Successor Agency Accounts Payable Check Number 102, totaling $1,350.00 b. MINUTES: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) December 6, 2022, Regular City Council Meeting
c. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY:
d. AWARD OF BID: None
e. CALL FOR BIDS: None
f. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolut ion No. 2022 -, approving Ma yor’s 20 23 recommendation for Mayor Pro Tem a nd City Council memb er assignments to var ious Co mmittees/Commissions/Boards. Pulled by Council Member McCarthy, becomes agenda item 13b
(2) Adopting Resolution N o. 2022 -154, authorizing change in signatories on the City G eneral, and Payroll, and Successor Agency General checking accounts with Chase JPMorgan.
g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2022 -155, authorizing the City Manager to execute a Side Letter Agreement to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Marina and the Marina Public Safety Officers Association (PSOA).
(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2022 -156, awarding a construction contract for the City of Marina -Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Sculpture Gar den Project to Monterey Peninsula Engineering (MPE) of Marina, CA for Total Bid 2 in the amount of $401,830; and allocating and appropriating additional funding in the amount of $ 328,835.50 to project account APF2125 for a total funding of $578,835.50.
h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: None
i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE): None
k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2022-157, approving the allocation of $48,000 for necessary City Hall lobby security and customer service improvements.
l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING): None
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS: None
Council Member McCarthy requested to pull agenda item 10f(1) for discussion Council Member Medina Dirksen made comments on agenda item 10k(1).

MEDINA DIR KSEN/VISSCHER: TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA MINUS 10f(1). 4-0-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote.
3 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, December 20, 2022 Page 4

12. OTHER ACTIONS ITEMS O F THE SUCCESSOR AGENC Y TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The Successo r Agency may, at its discretion, t ake action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak. NONE

13. OTHER ACTION ITEMS: Action listed for each Agenda it em is that which is requested by staff. The Ci ty Council may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

Note: No additional major projec ts or pro grams should b e undertaken without rev iew of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006). a. Have a discussion regarding unmet community facility needs and star ting process again to consider strategies and possible funding options to address these needs and provide direction to city staff.

Public Comments:
• Tommy Bolea – Commented that city should look at the building on the next property adjacent to City Hall, m ore that enough space for city office and storage for a new ladder truck. Believes survey shoul d be in multiple lang uages. Stated city does not need to burden citizens with another bond tax on their property bill.
• Karen Andersen – Asked where in Marina are there buildings that require a ladder truck? • Denise Turley – Spoke about fire response times being over the lim it. Asked how tall does the opening of a station have to be for a ladder truck to fit?

DELGADO/MCCARTHY: THAT WE DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE A SCOPE OF WORK, TO BRING TO COUNCIL FOR UP TO 18 MONTHS OF PUBLIC OUTREACH

AND SURVEYS THAT ARE APPROPRIATE, AND THAT STAFF PREPARE DESIGN

PLANS AND ALTERNATIVES, AS THEY SEE FITTING AND THAT WE DO

INCLUDE IN THAT PUBLIC OUTREACH, AND SURVEYS, EXISTING
CONDITIONS, EXISTING PHYSICALITY, CONDITIONS . 4 -0-0-0 M otion Passes by Roll Call Vote

b. Adopting Resolution No. 2022 -158, approving Mayor’s 2023 recommendation for Mayor Pro Tem a nd City Council memb er assignments to var ious Committees/Commissions/Boards. Pulled by Council Member McCarthy, was agenda item 10f(1)
Public Comments: None received
MCCARTHY/VISSCHER: TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -258, APPROVING MAYOR’S 2023 RECOMMENDATION FOR MAYOR PRO TEM AND CITY COUNCIL

MEMBER ASSIGNMENTS TO VARIOUS COMMITTEES/C OMMISSIONS/BOARDS WITH CHANGES TO APPOINT COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN MCCARTHY TO AMP . 4-0-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

4 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, December 20, 2022 Page 5

c. City Council discuss for not more than 30 minutes any projects from the below project list; and provide staff with any further direction in the matter.

Council M ember McCarthy asked about maintenance of the 120 -project priority list to 2023 budget discussion.

Mayor Delgado hopes department directors will take a look at prior ity list , determine what project falls under what department and write a 2-sentence description of a project and provide a ballpark estimate for each project on the list to help with prioritizing.

Council Member Visscher asked if list was available to the public and if the public can locate i t on the city’s website.

Council Member M edina Dirksen asked for a status update on the Chap arral arrangement and what is being done if anything. There was mention of a consultant being hired, can you tell me a little bit about what direction you have provided to staff about accommodating possibly horse boarding in our city? if so, what’s the scope of working being proposed?

Public Comments:
• Karen Andersen – Asked when did the retreat take place. • Denise Turley – Asked when did the retreat take place.

14. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council reports on meetings and con ferences atte nded (Gov’t Code Section 53232).

15. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:50 P.M.
5 November 22, 2022 Item No. 10f(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of November 15, 2022

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2023-, RECOGNIZING

A LOCAL EMERGENCY PERSISTS, RE -RATIFYING THE PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY BY GOVERNOR NEWSOM ON MARCH 4, 2020,

AND RE-AUTHORIZING REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA AND ITS CONSTITUENT BODIES FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 20, 2023 , THROUGH FEBRUARY 19 , 202 3, PURSUANT TO BROWN ACT PROVISIONS.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 2023-, regarding the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code §§54950-54963, hereinafter the “Brown Act”) making certain findings; and authorizing the City to continue to implement remote teleconferenced public meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies for the period January 20, 2022, through February 19, 2023.

BACKGROUND:

Government Code §54953(e) allows cities to continue to meet remotely during states of emergency proclaimed by the Governor under modified Brown Act requirements that are similar to but not identical to the rules and procedures established by the prior Executive Orders of Governor Newsom relating to the relaxation of certain Brown Act requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Government Code §54953(e) authorizes local agencies to us e teleconferencing without complying with teleconferencing requirement imposed by the Brown Act during a declared state of emergency when state or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing during the proclaimed state of emergency or when the legislative body had determined by majority vote that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

At a special meeting held on October 5, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-104 regarding the Brown Act making certain findings, and authorizing the City to implement remote teleconferenced public meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies might be held without compliance with Government Code §54953(b)(3) for the period October 5, 2021 through November 4, 2021; subsequently on November 2, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution 2021 -113 extending that period until December 2, 2021; on November 16, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution 2021 - 118 extending that period until December 16, 2021 ; on December 14, 2021, the Council adopted Resolution 2021 -134 extending th at period until January 13, 2022; and on January 11, 2022, the Council adopted Resolution 2022-02 extending that period to February 10, 2022; and on February 1, 2022, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -13, extending that period until March 3, 2022; on March 1, 2022 Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -32, extending that period to March 31, 2022, on March 15, 2022 Resolution 2022 -34; April 19, 2022 Resolution No. 2022 -48, and on May 17, 2022 adopted Resolution No. 2022-54; on June 21, 2022 Resolution No. 2022-78; on July 19, 2022, Resolution No. 2022 -94 on August 16, 2022 Resolution No. 2022 -105, on September 7, 2022 Resolution No. 2022 -110; on October 18, 2022, Resolution No. 2022 -123; on November 15, 2022 Resolution No. 2022 -134; on December 6, 2022, Resolution No. 2022 -140, extending the period during which remote teleconferenced public meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies might be held without compliance with Government Code §54953(b)(3) to January 19, 2023.

1 ANALYSIS:

On June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21 which among other things rescinded his prior Executive Order N-29-20 and set the date of October 1, 2021, for public agencies to transition back to public meetings held in full compliance with the Brown Act.

As the Delta variants surged in C alifornia, the legislature took action to extend the COVID -19 exemptions to the Brown Act’s teleconference requirements, subject to some additional requirements.

California and Monterey County are presently continuing to experience cases of the rapidly-spreading Omicron variant. Assembly Bill 361 amended Government Code §54953 and allowed a local agency to use teleconferencing in any of the following circumstances without complying with certain Brown Act provisions:

1. The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing.

2. The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by major ity vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

3. The legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote taken at a meeting held for the purpose described in 2 above, that as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

A local agency that holds a meeting under any of these circumstances would be required to follow certain requirements listed in the attached Resolution, in addition to giving notice of the meeting and posting agendas as required under the Brown A ct. These additional requirements are intended to protect the public’s right to participate in the meetings of local agency legislative bodies. The City of Marina adheres to the listed requirements.

Government Code §54953(e)(3) provides that if the state of emergency remains active for more than 30 days, a local agency must make the following findings by majority vote every 30 days to continue using the exemption to the Brown Act teleconferencing requirements:

● The legislative body has reconsidered the circumstances of the emergency; and

● Either of the following circumstances exist: the state of emergency continue to directly impact the ability of members to meet safely in person or State o r local officials continue to impose or recommend social distancing measures.

The goal of Government Code §54953 as revised by AB 361 is to improve and enhance public access to local agency meetings during the COVID -19 pandemic and future applicable emergencies by allowing broader access through teleconferencing options. The current version of Government Code §54953 became effective on September 16, 2021, with a sunset of the present version on January 1, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None identified.

2 CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible adoption of a resolution proclaiming a local emergency persists, re -ratifying the proclamation of a state of emergency by Governor Newsom on March 4, 2020, and re-authorizing remote teleconference meetings of the City Council of the City of Marina and its constituent bodies for the period January 20, 2023 , through February 19, 2023, pursuant to Brown Act provisions.

Respectfully submitted,

___________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

3 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA RECOGNIZING A LOCAL

EMERGENCY PERSISTS, RE -RATIFYING THE PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY BY GOVERNOR NEWSOM ON MARCH 4, 2020, AND RE -AUTHORIZING

REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA AND ITS CONSTITUENT BODIES FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 20, 2023, THROUGH FEBRUARY 19, 2023, PURSUANT TO BROWN ACT PROVISIONS.

WHEREAS, the City of Marina is committed to preserving and nurturing public access and participation in meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies; and

WHEREAS, all meetings of City of Marina’s legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business; and

WHEREAS, the Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e), makes provision f or remote teleconferencing participation in meetings by members of a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and

WHEREAS, a required condition is that a state of emergency is declared by the Governor pursuant to Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions as described in Government Code section 8558; and

WHEREAS, a proclamation is made when there is an actual incident, threat of disaster, or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the jurisdictions that are within the City’s boundaries, caused by natural, technological or human-caused disasters; and

WHEREAS, it is further required that state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, or, the legislative body meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees; and

WHEREAS, the City Council previously adopted Resolution No. 2021-104 on October 5, 2021, Resolution 2021-113 on November 2, 2021, Resolution 2021-118 on November 16, 2021, Resolution 202 1-134 on December 14, 2021, Resolution 2022-02 on January 11, 2022, Resolution 2022-13 on February 1, 2022, Resolution No. 2022-13 on March 1, 2022, Resolution 2022-32, on March 15, 2022 Resolution 2022-34; April 19, 2022 Resolution No. 2022-48, and on May 17, 2022 Resolution No. 2022-54; on June 21, 2022 Resolution No. 2022-78; on July 19, 2022 Resolution No. 2022-94; on August 16, 2022, Resolution No. 2022-105; Resolution No. 2022 -110 on September 7, 202 2, Resolution No. 2022 -123 on October 18, 2022,, , Resolution No. 2022 -134 on November 15, 2022 ; on December 6, 2022, Resolution No. 2022- 140, extending the period during which remote teleconferenced public meetings of the City Council and its constituent bodies might be held without compliance with Government Code §54953(b)(3) to January 19, 2023; and

WHEREAS, as a condition of extending the use of the provisions found in section 54953(e), the City Council must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency that exists in the City, and the City Council has done so; and

WHEREAS, emergency conditions persist in the City, specifically, the March 4, 2020, proclamation by the Governor of a state of emergency in the State of California due to COVID -19 and the March 13, 2020, proclamation of a state of emergency in the City of Marina by the City Manager, as the City’s Director of Emergency Services, due to COVID-19 which was subsequently ratified by the City Council on March 17, 2020, and after having been supplemented twice, and both proclamations of states of emergency remain in effect; and

4 Resolution No. 2023-
Page Two

WHEREAS, on September 22, 2021, the County of Monterey Health Department issued a Recommendation Regarding Social Distancing Including Remote Meetings of Legislative Bodies , attached hereto as Attachment 1; and

WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find that California and Monterey County are presently continuing to experience cases of the rapidly-spreading COVID-19 Omicron variant and as of June 13, 2022, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention rated the risk level for community transmission of COVID-19 in Monterey County as medium with a case rate of 29.9 individuals per 100,000 persons, as of June 13, 2022, a total of 750 persons have died of COVID-19 and 367 persons are reported as new cases currently suffering from COVID -19 with 27 persons reported hospitalized in Monterey County by the County Health Department; this situation has and will continue to cause, conditions of peril to the safety of persons within the City that are likely to be beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City, and desires to recognize and affirm a local emergency exists and re -ratify the proclamation of state o f emergency by the Governor of the State of California and to recognize the County of Monterey Health Department’s recommendation regarding social distancing; and

WHEREAS, as a consequence of the local emergency persisting, the City Council does hereby find that the City Council and its constituent bodies shall continue to conduct their meetings without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54953, as authorized by subdivision (e) of section 54953, and that such legislative bodies shall continue to comply with the requirements to provide the public with access to the meetings as prescribed in paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of section 54953; and

WHEREAS, the City of Marina will continue to implement the following measures for meetings of its City Council and its constituent bodies:
● Allow the public to access the meeting and require that the agenda provide an opportunity for the public to directly addres s the legislative body pursuant to the Brown Act’s other teleconferencing provisions.

● In each instance when the local agency provides notice of the teleconferenced meeting or posts its agenda, give notice for how the public can access the meeting and provide public comment.

● Identify and include in the agenda an opportunity for all persons to attend via a call -in or an internet-based service option; the legislative body need not provide a physical location for the public to attend or provide comments.

● Conduct teleconference meetings in a manner that protects the statutory and constitutional rights of the public.

● Stop the meeting until public access is restored in the event of a service disruption that either prevents the local agency from broadcasting the meeting to the public using the call -in or internet-based service option or is within the local agency’s contr ol and prevents the public from submitting public comments (any action taken during such a service disruption could be challenged under the Brown Act’s existing challenger provisions).

● Not require comments be submitted in advance (though the legislativ e body may provide that as an option) and provide the opportunity to comment in real time.

● Provide adequate time for public comment, either by establishing a timed public comment period or by allowing a reasonable amount of time to comment.

● If the legislative body uses a third -party website or platform to host the teleconference, and the third-party service requires users to register to participate, the legislative body must provide adequate time during the comment period for users to register and may not close the registration comment period until the comment period has elapsed.
5 Resolution No. 2023-
Page Three

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.

Section 2. Affirmation that Local Emergency Persists. The City Council hereby reconsiders the conditions of the state of emergency in the City and proclaims that a local emergency persists throughout the City, and:
(a) On September 22, 2021, the County of Monterey Health Department issued a Recommendation Regarding Social Distancing Including Remote Meetings of Legislative Bodies; and (b) California and Monterey County are presently continuing to experience cases of the rapidly- spreading COVID-19 Omicron variant and as of June 13, 2022, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention rated the risk level for community transmission of COVID-19 in Monterey County as medium with a case rate of 29.9 individuals per 100,000 persons, as of June 13, 2022, a total of 750 persons have died of COVID-19 and 367 persons are reported as new cases currently suffering from COVID-19 with 27 persons reported hospitalized in Monterey County by the County Health Department; and this has caused, and will continue to cause, conditions of peril to the safety of persons within the City that are likely to be beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City.

Section 3. Re-ratification of Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency. The City Council hereby reconsiders and re-ratifies the Governor of the State of California’s Proclamation of State of Emergency, effective as of its issuance date of March 4, 2020.

Section 4. Remote Teleconference Meetings. The City Manager and legislative bodies of the City of Marina, the City Council and its constituent bodies, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including, continuing to conduct open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.

Section 5. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) February 19, 2023, or such time the City Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the City Council of the City of Marina and its constituent bodies may continue to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of section 54953.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting held this 18th day of January 2023, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

___________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_____________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
6 ATTACHMENT 1
7 January 11, 2023 Item No. 10f(2)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of January 18, 2022

CITY COUNCI L CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2023 -,

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPLY FOR THE PERMANENT

LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION (PLHA) GRANT AS ADMINISTERED BY

THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT (STATE HCD) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE FINANCE

DIRECTOR TO MAKE APPROPRIATE BUDGETARY AMENDMENTS TO
BUDGET

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 2022- direction the City Manager to apply for the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) grant application.

2. Authorize Finance Director to make appropriate budgetary amendments.

BACKGROUND
In 2017, the State of California passed a 15 -bill housing package to address the state’s housing shortage and high housing costs. This included the Building Homes and Jobs Act (SB 2, 2017), which established a $75 recording fee on real estate documents. Seventy percent of these recording fees are being set aside for a Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program.

The PLHA program is overseen by the State’s Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) who issued a Requ est for Proposals (RFP) in March 2020. Jurisdictions receiving PLHA grant funds are required to have a five -year plan in place to determine how the grant funds will be spent. This five -year plan may or may not need to identify specific projects.

However, the Plan must result in expenditure of a portion of the grant funds each year in order to receive the next year’s allocation. HCD estimates the City of Marina may receive a cumulative amount of $945,290 over the next five years. Note that the amounts for these subsequent years are estimates only based on an equal division of HCD’s estimate for future funds. The actual annual funding allocation will later be determined by HCD.

Until recently, because the City does not have a certified Housing Element, Marina was ineligible for these funds. However, if the City Council adopts the Affordable Housing Overlay by January 18th with a second reading on February 7th 2023 this will demonstrate compliance with the Fourth and Fifth Cycle Housing Elements. The deadline to file for the PLHA funds is February 13, 2023 so immediate action by the City Council will ensure the funds can be granted by the State in the near term. Eligibility for these funds have been made possible by a Marina resident (Carlos Nuno) who works for State HCD and over the course of the past seven months has been providing guidance to the Community Development Department on the grant submittal process.

ANALYSIS
The grant funding can be used for a wide variety of activities that support the development of housing related to persons at the 60% Area Median Income (AMI) level . See Attachment 1 (Eligible Grant Activities) for additional details. Attachment 2 identifies how other local agencies 1 are utilizing their PLHA funds which include a wide array of activities including but not limited to: ADU financing, first time home buyer assistance, support of multifamily housing projects, and rapid response housing for individuals at risk for homelessness. Up to 5% of the grant allocation can be used for general administrative cost related to tracking and annual reporting on the execution of eligible activities.

Once the City Council approves the submission of the application to HCD, HCD is expected to approve the application and send the City a five -year Standard Agreement to be executed and signed within 90 days. All the first -year’s allocation will be available for disbursement once the Standard Agreement is executed. Each year, HCD will publish the amount of funds the City will receive for the following year. To receive the funds, the City must submit a letter accepting the funds, its annual report detailing uses and expenditures of all awa rded PLHA allocations and outcomes achieved, must have a certified Housing Element, and have submitted its latest Housing Element annual performance report. During the five -year expenditure plan period, up to 10% of the planned expenditure for each type of eligible activity may be reallocated to another activity without the submission of a plan amendment; however, changes exceeding this amount require HCD’s approval in writing.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City will be eligible for approximately $945,000 in grant funding which can assist the City in meeting it’s regional housing needs allocation (RHNA).

Respectfully submitted,

Guido F. Persicone
Community Development Director
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MARINA CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE

APPLICATION AND ADOPTING THE PLHA PLAN FOR THE PERMANENT

LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION PROGRAM

The City Council of the City of Marina (“Applicant”) hereby consents to, adopts, and ratifies the following resolution.

A. WHEREAS, the Department is authorized to provide up to $335 million under the SB 2 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program Formula Component from the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund for assistance to Cities and Counties (as described in Health and Safety Code section 50470 et seq. (Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2)).

B. WHEREAS the State of California (the “State”), Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) issued a Notice of Funding Availability (“NOFA”) dated 5/3/2021 under the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program;

C. WHEREAS the City of Marina is an eligible Local government who has applied for program funds to administer one or more eligible activities, or a Local or Regional Housing Trust Fund to whom an eligible Local government delegated its PLHA formula allocation after adoption of the Affordable Housing Overlay Policy by the City Council whic h will demonstrate sufficient capacity to meet our Regional Housing Needs RHNA allocation to State HCD on January 18, 2023

D. WHEREAS the Department may approve funding allocations for PLHA Program, subject to the terms and conditions of the Guidelines, NOFA, Program requirements, the Standard Agreement, and other contracts between the Department and PLHA grant recipients;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA:

1. If Applicant receives a grant of PLHA funds from the Department pursuant to the above referenced PLHA NOFA, it represents and certifies that it will use all such funds in a manner consistent and in compliance with all applicable state and federal statutes, rules, regulations, and laws, including without limi tation all rules and laws regarding the PLHA Program, as well as any and all contracts Applicant may have with the Department.

2. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to receive a PLHA grant, in an amount not to exceed the five-year estimate of the PLHA formula allocations, as stated in Appendix C of the current NOFA $945,000 in accordance with all applicable rules and laws.

3. Applicant hereby agrees to use the PLHA funds for eligible activities as approved by the Department and in accordance with all P rogram requirements, Guidelines, other rules and laws, as well as in a manner consistent and in compliance with the Standard Agreement and other contracts between the Applicant and the Department.

3 Resolution No. 2023-
Page Two

4. Pursuant to Section 302(c)(4) of the Guidelines, Applicant’s PLHA Plan for the 2019- 2023 Allocations is attached to this resolution, and Applicant hereby adopts this PLHA Plan and certifies compliance with all public notice, public comment, and public hearing requirements in accordance with the Guidelines.

5. Applicant certifies that it was delegated by the City of Marina to submit an application on its behalf and administer the PLHA grant award for the formula allocation of PLHA funds, pursuant to Guidelines Section 300(c) and 300(d), and the l egally binding agreement between the recipient of the PLHA funds and the Applicant is submitted with the PLHA application.

6. Applicant certifies that it has or will subgrant some or all of its PLHA funds to another entity or entities. Pursuant to Guidelines Section 302(c)(3), “entity” means a housing developer or program operator, but does not mean an administering Local government to whom a Local government may delegate its PLHA allocation.

7. Applicant certifies that its selection process of these subgrantee s was or will be accessible to the public and avoided or shall avoid any conflicts of interest.

8. Pursuant to Applicant’s certification in this resolution, the PLHA funds will be expended only for eligible Activities and consistent with all program requirements.

9. Applicant certifies that, if funds are used for the acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of for-sale housing projects or units within for-sale housing projects, the grantee shall record a deed restriction against the property that will ensure compliance with one of the requirements stated in Guidelines Section 302(c)(6)(A)(B) and (C).

10. Applicant certifies that, if funds are used for the development of an Affordable Rental Housing Development, the Local government shall make PLHA assistance in the form of a low -interest, deferred loan to the Sponsor of the Project, and such loan shall be evidenced through a Promissory Note secured by a Deed of Trust and a Regulatory Agreement shall restrict occupancy and rents in accordance with a Local government- approved underwriting of the Project for a term of at least 55 years.

11. Applicant shall be subject to the terms and conditions as specified in the Standard Agreement, the PLHA Program Guidelines and any other applicable SB 2 Guidelines published by the Department.

12. The City Manager is authorized to execute the PLHA Program Application, the PLHA Standard Agreement and any subsequent amendments or modifications thereto, as well as any other documents which are related to the Program or the PLHA grant awarde d to Applicant, as the Department may deem appropriate.

4 Resolution No. 2023-
Page Three

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on this 18th day of January 2023 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

Attachment 1-List of Eligible Grant Activities
Attachment 2-List of Local Agencies PLHA Activities

5 1
Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA)
Eligible Activities

1. The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily, residential live-work, rental housing that is affordable to extremely low-, very low-, low-, or moderate- income households, including necessary operating subsidies.

2. The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of Affordable rental and ownership housing, including Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), that meets the needs of a growing workforce earning up to 120 -percent of AMI, or 150 -percent of AMI in high -cost areas.

ADUs shall be available for occupancy for a term of no less than 30 days.

3. Matching portions of funds placed into Local or Regional Housing Trust Funds.

4. Matching portions of funds available through the Low - and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund pursuant to subdivision (d) of HSC Section 34176.

5. Capitalized Reserves for Services connected to the preservation and creation of new permanent supportive housing.

6. Assisting persons who are experiencing or at risk of homelessness, including, but not limited to, providing rapid rehousing, rental assistance, supportive/case management services that allow people to obtain and retain housing, operating and capital costs for navigation centers and emergency shelters, and the new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of permanent and transitional housing.

A. This activity may include subawards to administrative entities as defined in HSC Section 50490(a)(1-3) that were awarded CESH program or HEAP funds for rental assistance to continue assistance to these households.

B. Applicants must provide rapid rehousing, rental assistance, navigation centers, emergency shelter, and transitional housing activities in a manner consistent with the Housing First practices described in 25 CCR, Section 8409, subdivision (b)(1)-(6) and in compliance with WIC Section 8225(b)(8). An applicant allocated funds for the new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of permanent supportive housing shall incorporate the core components of Housing First, as provided in WIC Section 8255, subdivision (b).

7. Accessibility modifications in lower-income owner-occupied housing.

8. Efforts to acquire and rehabilitate foreclosed or vacant homes and apartments.

9. Homeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, down payment assistance.

10. Fiscal incentives made by a county to a city within the county to incentivize approval of one or more affordable housing projects, or matching funds invested by a county in an affordable housing development project in a city within the county, provided that the city has made an equal or greater investment in the project. The county fiscal incentives shall be in the form of a grant or low -interest loan to an affordable housing project. Matching funds investments by both the county and the city also shall be a grant or low-interest deferred loan to the affordable housing project.

ATTACHMENT 1
6 Attachment 2-List of Local Agencies PLHA Activities
1 City Year-2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Pacific
Grove
Regional
homeless shelter
services
regional
homeless shelter
services
rental assistance
for low -income
seniors

rental assistance
for low -income
seniors
rental assistance
for low -income
seniors
King
City
90%-Multi
Family housing
(predevelopment,
development,
acquisition)

5%-Homeless
Services-rapid
rehousing, rental
assistance, case
management)

5%-Program
Admin
45%-Multi
Family housing
(predevelopment,
development,
acquisition)

25%-Local
Regional
Housing Trust
Funds

25%-Homeless
Services-rapid
rehousing, rental
assistance, case
management)

5%-Program
Admin
45%-Multi
Family housing
(predevelopment,
development,
acquisition)

25%-Local
Regional
Housing Trust
Funds

25%-Homeless
Services-rapid
rehousing, rental
assistance, case
management)

5%-Program
Admin
70%-Multi
Family housing
(predevelopment,
development,
acquisition)

25%-Homeless
Services-rapid
rehousing, rental
assistance, case
management)

5%-Program
Admin
70%-Multi
Family housing
(predevelopment,
development,
acquisition)

25%-Homeless
Services-rapid
rehousing, rental
assistance, case
management)
Program Admin

5%-Program
Admin
Salinas 75%-Develop
multifamily
rental house-

20%-Homeless
Services (20%)
rapid rehousing

5%-Program
Admin
85%-Homeless
Services

10%-ADU
Financing-Grants
and Loans

5%-Program -
Administration
70%-
Development of
Multi Family
Rental

25%-Homeless
Services

5%-Program
Admin
40%-Multi-
Family Rental
Housing

10%-ADU
Financing

30%-Local
Housing Trust

15%-Homeless
Services-15%

5%-Admin
40%-Multi
Family Rental
Housing

10%-ADU
Financing

30%-Local
Housing Trust
Funds

15%-Homeless
Services-Rapid
Rehousing-
Rental
Assistance, Case
Management

5%-Program
Admin

7 Attachment 2-List of Local Agencies PLHA Activities
2 Soledad The County will administer Soledad’s funds for projects specific to this agency. Capitalizing the Monterey County Local Housing Trust Fund, construction financing for new permanent supportive housing, operating funds for navigation centers, and new construction of transitional housing are the top priorities of the County.

Carmel
by the
Sea
The County will administer Carmel by the Sea funds for projects specific to this agency.

Capitalizing the Monterey County Local Housing Trust Fund, construction financing for new permanent supportive housing, operating funds for navigation centers, and new construction of transitional housing are the top priorities of the County.

San
Jose
The City of San José plans to use PLHA funds to 1) fund operating costs for bridge housing communities for formerly homeless residents, and 2) fund operating costs for emergency interim housing communities for the provision of COVID -19-appropriate non -congregate shelter for formerly homeless residents, which will later be transitioned to bridge ho using communities for formerly homeless residents.

8 January 10, 2023 Item No: 10f(3)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of January 18, 2023

CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 23-, AUTHORIZING THE CHANGING OF THE NAME OF THE “DESIGNATED AVENUE OF LANDMARK TREES 1996” SIGNS ALONG BEACH ROAD TO NOW READ “MIKE OWEN AVENUE OF LANDMARK TREES 1996.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 20 23-, authorizing the changing of the name of the “ Designated Avenue of Landmark Trees 1996” signs along Beach Road to now read “Mike Owen Avenue of Landmark Trees 1996; and

2. Directing Public Works Department to order and replace signs

BACKGROUND:

In 1996 the City Council approved the Ad Hoc Tree Committees’ recommendation for memorial landmark tree markers along Beach Road. (“EXHIBIT A”).

In November 2022, Michael Owen, who was dedicated to preserving Marina’s historic trees passed away.

Mike was passionate about preserving the Eucalyptus trees along Beach Road. One way to honor Mikes’ legacy and passion for protecting the city’s historic trees would be to rename the tree signage along Beach Road to read “Mike Owen Avenue of Landmark Trees 1996”.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

1 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA
AUTHORIZING THE CHANGING OF THE NAME OF THE “DESIGNATED AVENUE OF LANDMARK TREES 1996” SIGNS ALONG BEACH ROAD TO NOW READ “MIKE OWEN AVENUE OF LANDMARK TREES 1996.

WHEREAS, in 1996 the City Council approved the Ad Hoc Tree Committe es’ recommendation for memorial landmark tree markers along Beach Road. (“EXHIBIT A”); and

WHEREAS, In November 2022, Michael Owen, who was dedicated to preserving Marina’s historic trees passed away. Mike was passionate about preserving the Eucalyptus trees along Beach Road.

WHEREAS, one way to honor Mikes’ legacy and passion for protecting the city’s historic trees would be to rename the tree signage along Beach Road to read “Mike Owen Avenue of Landmark Trees 1996”; and; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Authorizing the changing of the name of the “Designated Avenue of Landmark Trees 1996” signs along Beach Road to now read “Mike Owen Avenue of Landmark Trees 1996”; and

2. Directing Public Works Department to order and replace signs

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a special meeting duly held on this 18TH day of January 2023 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
2 EXHIBIT A
East-end of Beach Road
3 EXHIBIT A
West-end of Beach Road
4 January 10, 2023 Item No: 10f(4)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of January 18, 2023

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONSENT TO THE CITY

OF MONTEREY TO RENEW THE MONTEREY COUNTY TOURISM

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (MCTID) AND INCLUDE THE CITY OF

MARINA IN THE MCTID

REQUEST:

It is requested that City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 20 23-, approving consent to the City of Monterey to renew the Monterey County Tourism Improvement District (MCTID) and include the City of Marina in the MCTID

BACKGROUND:

First launched in 2006 under the Property and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (’89 Law), the Monterey County Tourism Improvement District (MCTID) is a benefit assessment district proposed to continue as a revenue source to help fund marketing and sal es promotion efforts for lodging businesses in Monterey County. In 2018, an effort to modernize the MCTID led to the disestablishment of the ’89 Law district and re -establishing the MCTID pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (’94 Law). On September 18, 2018, the City of Marina City Council approved Resolution No. 2018 -114, consenting to the City of Monterey establishing, operating, and renewing the MCTID, which District includes the City of Marina.

The five-year term of the MCTID is set to expire on December 31, 2023, and the required number of lodging business owners have submitted a written petition to renew the district. Pending successful renewal of the MCTID, the Owner’s Association will request to modify the current MCTID term to end early on June 30, 2023, with the renewed district beginning on July 1, 2023.

The 94 Law allows for the renewal of multi -jurisdictional tourism improvement districts, with consent of the included jurisdictions bein g granted to one “lead” jurisdiction. The City of Monterey has requested consent to continue to act as the lead jurisdiction in the renewal of the MCTID administering the MCTID countywide. Adopting this resolution will give the City authority to include the City of Marina in the renewed MCTID.

The MCTID boundary includes the unincorporated areas of Monterey County and the cities of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales, Greenfield, King City, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City, Seaside, and Soledad. The MCTID is divided into two (2) benefit zones with the City of Salinas being the sole occupier of Zone 2. Within each Zone lodging business assess a fee per night stay based on the level of lodging business as described below.

• Luxury lodging business means: a lodging business with an average daily rate of $500 or more, Luxury lodging businesses may have restaurants, meeting spaces, exercise rooms, or spas, and have characteristics of five (5) star hotels. • Non-luxury full-service lodging business means: a lodging business with a wide variety of onsite amenities, such as restaurants, meeting spaces, exercise rooms, or spas. • Limited-service lodging business means: a lodging business that offers limited facilities and amenities, typically without a full-service restaurant.

1 Lodging businesses do not include:

• Vacation time-share facilities;
• Vacation rentals, defined as a single family home, townhome, or condominium that is available for rent; and
• Recreational vehicle (RV) parks.

ANALYSIS:

The MCTID is an assessment district which provides specific benefits to payors by funding group sales and services and marketing communications activities for assessed businesses. The purpose of the MCTID is to target hotel promotion and booking room nights.

The action contained in the attached resolution will enable the City of Monterey and the Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau (MCCVB) to move forward with the MCTID renewal process. Upon successful renewal, the MCTID will continue to be governed by the TID Oversight Committee and the Management District Plan (MDP), facilitated by the Monterey City Council and the Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau (the Owner’s Association).

Management District Plan

The Management District Plan ( Exhibit “A” ) includes the proposed boundary of the renewed MCTID, a service plan and budget, and a proposed means of governance. The MCTID shall include all lodging businesses, existing and in the future, located within the boundaries o f the unincorporated areas of Monterey County and the cities of Carmel -by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales, Greenfield, King City, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City, Seaside, and Soledad. The MCTID is divided into two (2) benefit zones as described in the Plan.

The cities and County shall continue to be responsible for collecting the assessment on a monthly, bi-monthly, or quarterly basis (including any delinquencies, penalties, and interest) from each lodging business located within the boundaries of the MCTID. The cities and County shall make all reasonable efforts to collect the assessments from each lodging business. The cities and County shall forward the assessments to Monterey County Destination Marketing Organization, Inc. d.b.a.

Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau (MCCVB), serving as the MCTID Owner’s Association, which will have the responsibility of managing MCTID programs as provided in the Management District Plan.

Lodging business owners decided to pursue renewal of the MCTID in order to continue a revenue source devoted to marketing Monterey County as a tourist, meeting, and event destination.

Assessments

The MCTID is separated into two Zones with different assessment rates. Salinas is the only jurisdiction included in the MCTID that is in Zone 2. Within each Zone, assessments are levied based on the services and average daily rate of the business. The Management District Plan calls for increases to the assessments every two years for 10 years ending in 2033 . The Assessments proposed are contained in Table 1 below.

2 Table 1. Assessment Increase Schedule

Zone
1 Zone
2 Fiscal
Year Luxury Non-Luxury
Full Service
Limited
Service Luxury Non-Luxury
Full Service
Limited
Service
2023-24 $ 7.00 $ 4.50 $ 1.50 $ 7.50 $ 5.00 $ 2.00
2024-25 $ 7.00 $ 4.50 $ 1.50 $ 7.50 $ 5.00 $ 2.00
2025-26 $ 7.90 $ 5.10 $ 1.70 $ 8.40 $ 5.60 $ 2.20
2026-27 $ 7.90 $ 5.10 $ 1.70 $ 8.40 $ 5.60 $ 2.20
2027-28 $ 8.80 $ 5.70 $ 1.90 $ 9.30 $ 6.20 $ 2.40
2028-29 $ 8.80 $ 5.70 $ 1.90 $ 9.30 $ 6.20 $ 2.40
2029-30 $ 9.70 $ 6.30 $ 2.10 $ 10.20 $ 6.80 $ 2.60
2030-31 $ 9.70 $ 6.30 $ 2.10 $ 10.20 $ 6.80 $ 2.60
2031-32 $ 10.60 $ 6.90 $ 2.30 $ 11.10 $ 7.40 $ 2.80
2032-33 $ 10.60 $ 6.90 $ 2.30 $ 11.10 $ 7.40 $ 2.80

Table 2. Estimated Annual Assessment Budget
FY Marketing
Comm.

Group Bus.

Devel.

Salinas
Visitor
Services
(Zone 2 Only)
Contingency
/ Reserve
Admin &
Operations
City/County
Admin Fee

Total
2023-24 $3,985,320 $3,152,831 $123,988 $885,627 $619,939 $88,563 $8,856,266 2024-25 $3,985,320 $3,152,831 $123,988 $885,627 $619,939 $88,563 $8,856,266 2025-26 $4,504,690 $3,563,710 $140,146 $1,001,042 $700,730 $100,104 $10,010,422 2026-27 $4,504,690 $3,563,710 $140,146 $1,001,042 $700,730 $100,104 $10,010,422 2027-28 $5,024,060 $3,974,590 $156,304 $1,116,458 $781,520 $111,646 $11,164,578 2028-29 $5,024,060 $3,974,590 $156,304 $1,116,458 $781,520 $111,646 $11,164,578 2029-30 $5,543,430 $4,385,469 $172,462 $1,231,873 $862,311 $123,187 $12,318,734 2030-31 $5,543,430 $4,385,469 $172,462 $1,231,873 $862,311 $123,187 $12,318,734 2031-32 $6,062,801 $4,796,349 $188,620 $1,347,289 $943,102 $134,729 $13,472,890 2032-33 $6,062,801 $4,796,349 $188,620 $1,347,289 $943,102 $134,729 $13,472,890 Total $50,240,601 $39,745,898 $1,563,041 $11,164,578 $7,815,205 $1,116,458 $111,645,780

The projected budgeted TID revenues from each jurisdiction varies based on the number and make up of its lodging businesses. The City of Marina has 12 hotels included in the MCTID, all are limited service lodging businesses with the exception of the Sanctuary Beach Resort which is a full service lodging business. Marina’s TID revenues are approximately 4.6% of the total MCTID revenues and are projected at approximately $407,388 for 2023/24 after the district is renewed.

Work Effort
The purpose of the MCTID is to target hotel promotion and booking room nights. The work efforts supported by the generation of TID revenues includes:

• Marketing Communications - the marketing communications program will promote assessed businesses as tourist, meeting, and events destinations. The marketing communications program will have a central theme of promoting Monterey County as a desirable place for overnight visits.
3 • Group Business Developmen t - the group business development program will devel op business leads for meetings and events that convert to room nights for assessed businesses.

The group business development program will have a central theme of promoting Monterey County as a desirable place for overnight group visits.

A service plan assessment budget has been developed to deliver services that benefit the assessed businesses. The table below illustrates the initial annual assessment budget allocations. The total initial assessment budget is $8,856,266. Expenditures included in the work effort include:

Salinas Visitor Services - $123,988
Administration & Operations - $619,939
Marketing Communications - $3,985,320
City/County Administration Fee - $88,563
Contingency Reserve - $885,627
Group Business Development - $3,152,831
Total Initial Annual Assessment Budget - $8,856,266

FISCAL IMPACT:

None immediately. Because the MCTID programs are intended to increase room night sales for assessed businesses within the MCTID, there may be an increase in tax collections.

The cities and the County may retain a fee equal to one percent (1%) of the amount of the assessment collected within their respective jurisdictions to cover their costs of collection and administration.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the Council adopt the attached resolution granting consent to the City of Monterey to renew the MCTID and include the City of Marina in the MCTID, which will enable the City of Monterey and the Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau (MCCVB) to move forward with the MCTID renewal process.

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Matt Mogensen
Assistant City Manager
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

4 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA, STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONSENT TO THE CITY OF MONTEREY TO RENEW

THE MONTEREY COUNTY TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (MCTID)

WHEREAS, the City of Monterey initially created the MCTID in 2006 under the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989; and

WHEREAS, the MCTID was converted in 2019 under Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 by Resolution No. 18-147 for a five (5) year term, which ends December 31, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monterey has requested consent to renew the MCTID in the City of Marina with adoption of Monterey City Council Resolution No. 22-169, dated December 20, 2022;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , by the City Council of the City of Marina, that:

Section 1: The above recitals are true and correct.

Section 2: The City of Monterey is hereby granted consent to include the City of Marina in the MCTID, for the renewal of the MCTID and future renewals.

Section 3: The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Clerk of the City of Monterey City Council.

Section 4: This Resolution is effective upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, State of California, held on this 18th day of January, 2023 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

5 2023-2033

MONTEREY COUNTY

TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PLAN
November 2, 2022
Prepared pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, Streets and Highways Code section 36600 et seq.

EXHIBIT A
6 CONTENTS
I. OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................ 3 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 5 III. BOUNDARY ....................................................................................................................................... 7 IV. ASSESSMENT BUDGET AND SERVICES ................................................................................ 9 A. Annual Service Plan ................................ ................................ ................................ ....9 B. Annual Assessment Budget................................ ................................ ........................ 11 C. California Constitutional Compliance ................................ ................................ ........ 12 D. Assessment ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 13 E. Penalties and Interest ................................ ................................ ................................ . 14 F. Time and Manner for Collecting Assessments ................................ ........................... 15 V. GOVERNANCE ............................................................................................................................... 16 A. Owners’ Association ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 16 B. Brown Act and California Public Records Act Compliance ................................ ........ 16 C. Annual Report ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 16 APPENDIX 1 – LAW .................................................................................................................................... 17 APPENDIX 2 – ASSESSED BUSINESSES ............................................................................................. 28 APPENDIX 3 – BENEFITS BY HOTEL TYPE .................................................................................... 35 APPENDIX 4 - TOURISM ECONOMICS STUDY .............................................................................. 37 Prepared by
Civitas
(800)999-7781
www.civitasadvisors.com
7 MCTID Management District Plan 3
November 2, 2022

I. OVERVIEW

Developed by the Monterey County Destination Marketing Organization, Inc. d.b.a. Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau (MCCVB), the Monterey County Tourism Improvement District (MCTID) is an assessment district which provides specific benefits to payors by funding group sales and services and marketing communications activities for assessed businesses. This approach has been used successfully in other destination areas throughout the country to provide the benefit of additional room night sales directly to payors. The MCTID was initially created in 2006 pursuant to the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 and was converted in 2019 pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 for a five (5) year term. MCCVB and Monterey County lodging businesses now wish to renew the MCTID for a ten (10) year term. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §36620.5, the City of Monterey shall continue to act as the lead jurisdiction for renewing the MCTID. The City of Monterey shall continue to receive MCTID annual reports. Funds raised through the MCTID are meant to supplement the Jurisdiction Partnership investments so as to have a competitive budget and business plan.

Location: The renewed MCTID includes all lodging businesses located within the boundaries of the unincorporated areas of Monterey County and the cities of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales, Greenfield, King City, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City, Seaside, and Soledad. The MCTID is divided into two (2) benefit zones, as shown on the map in Section IV.

Services: The MCTID is designed to provide specific benefits directly to payors by increasing demand for room night sales. Group business development and marketing communications activities will increase demand for overnight tourism and market Monterey County as a tourist, meeting and event destination, thereby increasing demand for room night sales for assessed businesses.

Budget: The total MCTID annual assessment budget for the initial year of its ten (10) year operation is anticipated to be approximately $8,856,266. This assessment budget is expected to increase as the assessment rate increases are adopted pursuant to this Plan, but this budget is expected to fluctuate as room sales do.

Cost: The assessment is a fixed amount per occupied room per night. The assessment is based on the business hotel type. Based on the benefit received, assessments shall not be collected on: stays of more than thirty (30) consecutive days; stays at vacation time- share facilities; stays at vacation rentals; stays at RV parks; stays by any Federal or State of California officer or employee when on official business; and stays by any officer or employee of a foreign government who is exempt by reason of express provi sion of Federal law or international treaty. Initial assessment rates are:

Hotel Type Zone 1 Zone 2
Luxury $7.00 $7.50
Non-Luxury Full Service $4.50 $5.00
Limited Service $1.50 $2.00

Based on the provision of additional services and additional benefit to the lodging businesses, the assessment rate shall automatically increase biennially beginning in FY 8 MCTID Management District Plan 4
November 2, 2022
2025-26, unless the MCCVB Board’s TID Committee votes not to implement the automatic increase based upon circumstances that they deem significant. If the MCCVB Board’s TID Committee elects to cancel the automatic increase for that year, the MCCVB Board’s TID Committee may implement a cumulative increase at the next regularly scheduled rate increase.

Collection: The cities and County shall be responsible for collecting the assessment on a monthly, bi-monthly or quarterly basis (including any delinquencies, penalties and interest) from each lodging business located in the boundaries of the MCTID. The cities and County shall make all reasonable efforts to collect the assessments from each lodging business.

Duration: The renewed MCTID shall have a ten (10) year life, beginning July 1, 2023, or as soon as possible thereafter, and end ten (10) years from its start date. Once per year, beginning on the anniversary of MCTID renewal, there is a thirty (30) day period in which owners paying fifty percent (50%) or more of the assessment may protes t and initiate a Monterey City Council hearing on MCTID termination.

Management: The MCCVB Monterey County Destination Marketing Organization, Inc. d.b.a.

Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau (MCCVB) shall continue to serve as the Owners’ Asso ciation for the MCTID. The MCCVB Board’s TID Committee shall continue to have full decision-making authority over the expenditure of MCTID funds as defined in Section V. The Owners’ Association is charged with managing funds and implementing activities in accordance with this Plan and must provide annual reports to the Monterey City Council.

9 MCTID Management District Plan 5
November 2, 2022
II. BACKGROUND

A. Tourism Improvement District Overview
TIDs are an evolution of the traditional Business Improvement District. The first TID was formed in West Hollywood, California in 1989. Since then, over 100 California destinations have followed suit. In recent years, other states have begun adopting the California model – Massachusetts, Montana, South Dakota, Washington, Colorado, Texas and Louisiana have adopted TID laws. Several other states are in the process of adopting their own legislation. The cities of Wichita, Kansas and Newark, New Jersey used an existing business improvement district law to form a TID. And, some cities, like Portland, Oregon a nd Memphis, Tennessee have utilized their home rule powers to create TIDs without a state law.

California’s TIDs collectively
raise over $300 million
annually for local destination
marketing. With competitors
raising their budgets, and
increasing riv alry for visitor
dollars, it is important
that Monterey County lodging
businesses continue to invest
in stable, lodging -specific
marketing programs.

TIDs utilize the efficiencies of
private sector operation in the
market-based promotion of
tourism districts. TIDs allow lodging business owners to organize their efforts to increase demand for room night sales. Lodging business owners within the TID pay an assessment and those funds are used to provide services that increase demand for room night sales.

In California, most TIDs are formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994. This law allows for the creation of a benefit assessment district to raise funds within a specific geographic area. The key difference between TIDs and other benefit assessment districts is that funds raised are returned to the private non-profit corporation governing the district.

B. Tourism Improvement District Benefits
There are many benefits to TIDs:
• Funds must be spent on services and improvements that provide a specific benefit only to those who pay;
• Funds cannot be diverted to general government programs; • They are customized to fit the needs of payors in each destination; • They allow for a wide range of services;
• They are designed, created and governed by those who will pay the assessment; and • They provide a stable, long-term funding source for tourism promotion.

10 MCTID Management District Plan 6
November 2, 2022
C. MCTID History and Partnerships with Jurisdictions
The history of the Monterey County Tourism Improvement District (MCTID) is one of partnership.

The MCTID was first established in 2006 because the region’s hospitality industry recognized that TIDs create a reliable funding source for destination marketing.

Municipalities and the County of Monterey have historically demonstrated a commitment to fund tourism promotion. The renewed and expanded MCTID has been developed with this partnership in mind. The continued partnership is critical to the MCTID’s success, as the funds raised through both the TID , the municipalities and the County of Monterey will allow a competitive budget and business plan for the region’s destination marketing.

D. Looking Ahead

Market share, revenue, improved community connectivity

Focus Currently Investment in a Better Future
Sphere of Marketing
Reach
Primarily Regional paid media
advertiser
National Brand with paid media reach into
Midwest, East Coast – high value travelers
Meetings &
Conferences
Five-person sales team; primarily
focused on regional meetings;
limited booking incentive
Expand sales team; increase sales activities;
aggressive booking incentive; intensify focus
on corporate, incentive and Tour & Travel
Event Attraction &
Promotion
No proactive event attraction
effort; promotion limited to
social and PR (no paid media)
Dedicated program to attract advantageous
events; paid media support for select events
Transportation
Development
Tactical and reactive; lacking a
well-supported MCCVB/
Community strategy
Annual dedicated budget; strategically proactive
International Marketing One sales executive, limited co- op (VCA, Brand USA) marketing
Multi-country sales representation, significant
increase in direct sales and marketing
Luxury Initiative
Direct sales through involvement
with Virtuoso, ILTM, VCA;
limited marketing
Significant expansion (2-3X) of both sales and
marketing programs
Sustainable/Responsible
Travel
Consistent messaging through
unpaid (social & PR), limited
paid media; implementation of
See Monterey app
On-going paid media campaign; support shuttle
programs/promotion; in-market
collateral/signage;

11 MCTID Management District Plan 7
November 2, 2022
III. BOUNDARY

The renewed MCTID shall include all lodging businesses, existing and in the future, available for public occupancy within the boundaries of the unincorporated areas of Monterey County and the cities of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales, Greenfield, King City, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City, Seaside, and Soledad.

Lodging business means: any building, portion of any building, or group of buildings in which there are guest rooms or suites, including housekeeping units for transient guests, where lodging with or without meals is provided. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, lodging business does not include:
• Vacation time-share facilities;
• Vacation rentals, defined as a single family home, townhome, or condominium that is available for rent; and
• Recreational vehicle (RV) parks.

There are three types of lodging businesses in the MCTID: luxury, non-luxury full service, and limited service.

• Luxury lodging business means: a lodging business with an average daily rate of $500 or more, based on the previous year’s performance , with premium services and the highest quality ratings. Lodging businesses whose average daily rate increases to $500 or more will be assessed upon determination of the increase; likewise, lodging businesses whose average daily rate decreases to below $500 will not be assessed as a luxury lodging business upon determination of the decrease. Average daily rate figures shall be updated annually. Luxury lodging businesses may have restaurants, meeting spaces, exercise rooms, or spas, and have characteristics of five (5) star hotels. The luxury lodging business type includes properties classified as all-inclusive, boutique, and destination resorts by Smith Travel Research.

• Non-luxury full service lodging business means: a lodging business with a wide variety of onsite amenities, such as restaurants, meeting spaces, exercise rooms, or spas. non-luxury full service lodging businesses are often in the upscale or upper upscale class as defined by Smith Travel Research.

• Limited service lodging business means: a lodging business that offers limited facilities and amenities, typically withou t a full -service restaurant. Limited service lodging businesses are often in the economy, midscale, or upper midscale class as defined by Smith Travel Research.

A complete listing of lodging businesses within the proposed MCTID can be found in Appendix 2.

The proposed MCTID is divided into two (2) benefit zones, based on the special benefits and privileges granted to lodging businesses in each zone. The boundaries of each zone are shown in the map on the following page. A description of the boundaries of each zone is provided below:

Zone 1: Includes the unincorporated area of Monterey County and the cities of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales, Greenfield, King City, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Sand City, Seaside, and Soledad.

Zone 2: Includes the City of Salinas. The boundaries of Zone 2 shall be the boundaries of the City of Salinas as may be amended from time to time.
12 MCTID Management District Plan 8
November 2, 2022

13 MCTID Management District Plan 9
November 2, 2022
IV. ASSESSMENT BUDGET AND SERVICES

A. Annual Service Plan
Assessment funds shall be spent to provide specific benefits conferred or privileges granted directly to the payors that are not provided to those not charged, and which do not exceed the reasonable cost to the City of Monterey of conferring the benefits or gra nting the privileges. The privileges and services provided with the MCTID funds are group business development and marketing communications activities available only to assessed lodging businesses. The assessment rate for each hotel type will be commensurate with privileges and services provided to assessed businesses in each hotel type as detailed in Appendix 4.

A service plan assessment budget has been developed to deliver services that benefit the assessed businesses. A detailed annual assessment budget shall be developed and approved by MCCVB. The table below illustrates the initial annual assessment budget allocations. The total initial assessment budget is $8,856,266.

Although actual revenues will fluctuate due to market conditions, the proportional allocations of the assessment budget shall remain the same. However, with the exception of the Zone 2 assessment budget category of Salinas Visitor Services, the MCCVB TID Committee shall have the authority to adjust assessment budget allocations between the categories by no more than fifteen percent (15%) of the total assessment budget per year. Any changes to the assessment budget category allocations shall be included in the annual report to the City of Monterey. A description of the proposed improvements and activities for the initial year of operation is below. The same activities are proposed for subsequent years. In the event of a legal challenge against the MCTID, any and all assessment funds may be used for the costs of defending the MCTID.

Each assessment budget category includes all costs related to providing that service. For example, the marketing communications assessment budget includes the cost of MCCVB s taff time dedicated to overseeing and implementing the marketing communications program. Staff time dedicated purely to administrative tasks is allocated to the administrative portion of the assessment budget. The costs of Marketing
Communications,
$3,985,320 , 45%
Group Business Development,
$3,152,831 , 35.6%
Contingency Reserve,
$885,627 , 10%
City/County
Administration Fee,
$88,563 , 1%
Administration & Operations,
$619,939 , 7%
Salinas Visitor Services,
$123,988 , 1.4%
Initial Annual Assessment Budget - $8,856,266
14 MCTID Management District Plan 10
November 2, 2022
an individual staff member may be allocated to multiple assessment budget categories. The staffing levels necessary to provide the services below shall be determined by the MCCVB on an as-needed basis.

Marketing Communications
The marketing communications program will promote assessed businesses as tourist, meeting, and events destinations. The marketing communications program will have a central theme of promoting Monterey County as a desirable place for overnight visits. The program will have the goal of generating overnight visitation and room sales at assessed businesses, and may include the following activities:
• Programs that develop and distribute content via paid, owned and earned channels to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses; • Partnership marketing initiatives with Monterey Regional Airport for domestic marketing, plus cooperative programs for international marketing to reach farther -out prospective visitors to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses; • Focus on high-priority, high-impact initiatives to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses;
• Collaborations with transportation partners to make it easier to get to and around Monterey County to drive ideal overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses; • Drive familiarity and engagement for group audiences through targeted direct marketing and retargeting programs to complement Group Sales’ business development focus to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses; and • Expand international marketing to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses.

Group Business Development
The group business development program will develop business leads for meetings and events that convert to room nights for as sessed businesses. The group business development program will have a central theme of promoting Monterey County as a desirable place for overnight group visits. The program will have the goal of generating overnight visitation and room night sales at assessed businesses, and may include the following activities:
• Group marketing initiatives to ensure target customer destination familiarity to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses;
• A business development model ensuring highly qualified leads and efficient use of Owners’ Association resources in developing new business opportunities to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses;
• Focus on business development platform: engage, action, transaction, participation to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses; • Familiarization trips (FAMs) and site inspections to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses;
• Strategic client services designed to make attendee’s destination choice easier to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses; • Visitor services programs designed to extend stays at assessed businesses and increase visitor spending;
• Strategic business development services designed to identify, qualify, and pursue new business opportunities that best fit the destination’s profile, targeting the ideal opportunities from key deployed markets to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses; and • Tour and travel sales programs to fill shoulder seasons and need periods for the destination to drive overnight visitation and room sales to assessed businesses. 15 MCTID Management District Plan 11
November 2, 2022
Salinas Visitor Services
The Salinas Visitor Services portion of the assessment budget shall be utilized for funding visitor services activities for the benefit of generating overnight visitation and room night stays at Zone 2 lodging businesses. The Salinas Visitor Services program will provide visitors with brochures, maps, and information regarding local events. The Salinas Visitor Services assessment budget shall be the amount collected annually from the additional $0.50 assessment in Zone 2.

MCCVB Administration and Operations
The MCCVB administration and operations portion of the assessment budget shall be utilized by the MCCVB for administrative staffing costs, office costs, and other general administrative costs such as insurance, legal, and accounting fees.

City/County Administration Fee
The cities and County may retain a fee equal to one percent (1%) of the amount of the assessment collected, within their respective jurisdictions, to cover their costs of collection and administration.

Contingency/Reserve
The assessment budget includes a contingency line item to account for lower than anticipated collections or higher than anticipated program costs, if any. Up to ten percent (10%) of the assessment budget may be allocated to the contingency/reserve in any given year. If there are contingency funds collected, they may be held in a reserve fund or utilized for other program, administration or renewal costs at the discret ion of the TID Committee. Policies relating to contributions to the reserve fund, the target amount of the reserve fund, and expenditure of monies from the reserve fund shall be set by the TID Committee. Contingency/reserve funds may be spent on TID activities or administrative and renewal costs in such proportions as determined by the Committee. The reserve fund may be used for the costs of renewing the TID.

B. Annual Assessment Budget
The assessment is a fixed amount per occupied room per night. The assessment is based on the business hotel type. Based on the provision of additional services and additional benefit to the lodging businesses, the assessment rate shall automatically increase biennially beginning in FY 2025-26 for both Zone 1 and Zone 2 , unless the MCCVB Board’s TID Committee votes not to implement the automatic increase based upon circumstances that they deem significant. If the MCCVB Board’s TID Committee elects to cancel the automatic increase for that year, the MCCVB Board’s TID Committee may implement a cumulative increase at the next regularly scheduled rate increase. Because services shall remain constant for the Salinas Visitor Services program (brochures, maps, and i nformation regarding local events for visitors), the additional rate of $0.50 per annum in Zone 2 shall remain static over the life of the district. The biennial assessment increase in both Zone 1 and Zone 2 (notwithstanding the static $0.50 rate in Zone 2), shall be $0.90 per paid occupied room per night for luxury lodging businesses, $0.60 per paid occupied room per night for non-luxury full service lodging businesses, and $0.20 per paid occupied room per night for limited service lodging businesses.

The assessment budget is projected at an initial budget of $8,856,266, increasing biennially for a total of $111,645,780 through 2033. This amount is expected to fluctuate as occupancy rates increase at assessed businesses and when the assessment rate is increased. The following table demonstrates the estimated assessment budget over the life of the district , based on existing lodging bus inesses, following the rate increase schedule. Any new lodging businesses that commence business within the MCTID during the ten (10) year term shall be assessed using the same methodology listed in Section IV (D).
16 MCTID Management District Plan 12
November 2, 2022
Estimated Annual Assessment Budget
Fiscal
Year
Marketing
Comm.

Group Bus.

Devel.

Salinas Visitor
Services
(Zone 2 Only)
Contingency
/ Reserve
Admin &
Operations
City/County
Admin Fee Total
2023-24 $3,985,320 $3,152,831 $123,988 $885,627 $619,939 $88,563 $8,856,266 2024-25 $3,985,320 $3,152,831 $123,988 $885,627 $619,939 $88,563 $8,856,266 2025-26 $4,504,690 $3,563,710 $140,146 $1,001,042 $700,730 $100,104 $10,010,422 2026-27 $4,504,690 $3,563,710 $140,146 $1,001,042 $700,730 $100,104 $10,010,422 2027-28 $5,024,060 $3,974,590 $156,304 $1,116,458 $781,520 $111,646 $11,164,578 2028-29 $5,024,060 $3,974,590 $156,304 $1,116,458 $781,520 $111,646 $11,164,578 2029-30 $5,543,430 $4,385,469 $172,462 $1,231,873 $862,311 $123,187 $12,318,734 2030-31 $5,543,430 $4,385,469 $172,462 $1,231,873 $862,311 $123,187 $12,318,734 2031-32 $6,062,801 $4,796,349 $188,620 $1,347,289 $943,102 $134,729 $13,472,890 2032-33 $6,062,801 $4,796,349 $188,620 $1,347,289 $943,102 $134,729 $13,472,890 Total $50,240,601 $39,745,898 $1,563,041 $11,164,578 $7,815,205 $1,116,458 $111,645,780

C. California Constitutional Compliance
The MCTID assessment is not a property -based assessment subject to the requirements of Proposition 218. Courts have found Proposition 218 limited the term ‘assessments’ to levies on real property.1 Rather, the MCTID assessment is a business -based assessment, and is subject to Proposition 26. Pursuant to Proposition 26 all levies are a tax unless they fit one of seven exceptions.

Two of these exceptions apply to the MCTID, a “specific benefit” and a “specific government service.” Both require that the costs of benefits or services do not exceed the reasonable costs to the cities and County of conferring the benefits or providing the services.

1. Specific Benefit
Proposition 26 requires that assessment funds be expe nded on, “ a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege.”2 The services in this Plan are designed to provide targeted benefits directly to assessed businesses, and are intended only to provide benefits and services directly to those businesses paying the assessment. These services are tailored not to serve the general public , businesses in general, or parcels of land, but rather to serve the specific businesses within the MCTID. The activities described in this Plan are specifically targeted to increase demand for room night sales for assessed lodging businesses within the boundaries of the MCTID, and are narrowly tailored. MCTID funds shall be used exclusively to provide the specific benefit of increased demand for room night sales directly to the assessees. Assessment funds shall not be used to feature non -assessed lodging businesses in MCTID activities, or to directly generate sales for non -assessed businesses. The activities paid for from assessment revenues are business services constituting and providing specific benefits to the assessed businesses.

The assessment imposed by this MCTID is for a specific benefit conferred directly to the payors that is not provided to those not charged. The specific benefit conferred directly to the payors is the generation of room night sales. The specific benefit of increased demand for room night sales for assessed lodging businesses shall be provided only to lodging businesses paying the district assessment, with MCTID activities promoting lodging businesses paying the MCTID assessment. The MCTID activities will be designed to generate room night sales at each assessed lodging businesses. Because they are necessary to provide the MCTID activities that specifically benefit the assessed lodging

1 Jarvis v. the City of San Diego 72 Cal App. 4th 230
2 Cal. Const. art XIII C § 1(e)(1)
17 MCTID Management District Plan 13
November 2, 2022
businesses, the administration and contingency services also provide the specific benefit of increased demand for room night sales to the assessed lodging businesses.

Although the MCTID, in providing specific benefits to payors, may produce incidental benefits to non-paying businesses, the incidental benefit does not preclude the services from being considered a specific benefit. The legislature has found that, “A specific benefit is not excluded from classification as a ‘specific benefit’ merely because an indirect benefit to a nonpayor occurs incidentally and without cost to the payor as a consequence of providing the specific benefit to the payor.”3

2. Specific Government Service
The assessment may also be utilized to provide, “a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product .”4 The legislature has recognized that marketing and promotions services like those to be provided by the MCTID are government services within the meaning of Proposition 26 5. Further, the legislature has determined that “a specif ic government service is not excluded from classification as a ‘specific government service’ merely because an indirect benefit to a nonpayor occurs incidentally and without cost to the payor as a consequence of providing the specific government service to the payor.”6

3. Reasonable Cost
MCTID services will be implemented carefully to ensure they do not exceed the reasonable cost of such services . The full amount assessed shall be used to provide the services described herein.

Excluding Zone 2 funds managed by the City of Salinas, funds shall be managed by the MCCVB, and reports submitted on an annual basis to the City of Monterey. Only assessed lodging businesses will be featured in marketing materials, receive sales leads generated from MCTID-funded activities, be featured in advertising campaigns, and benefit from other MCTID-funded services. Non -assessed lodging businesses will not receive these, nor any other, MCTID-funded services and benefits.

The MCTID-funded activities are all targeted directly at and feature only assessed businesses. It is, however, possible that there will be a spill over benefit to non -assessed businesses. If non-assessed lodging businesses receive incremental room nights, that portion of the promotion or program generating those room nights shall be paid with non -MCTID funds. MCTID funds shall only be spent to benefit the assessed businesses, and shall not be spent on that portion of any program which directly generates incidental room nights for non-assessed businesses.

D. Assessment
The assessment is a fixed amount per occupied room per night. The assessment is based on the business hotel type. Based on the provision of additional services and additional benefit to the lodging businesses, the assessment rate shall automatically increase biennially beginning in FY 2025-26, unless the MCCVB Board’s TID Committee votes not to implement the automatic increase based upon circumstances that they deem significant. If the MCCVB Board’s TID Committee elects to cancel the automatic increase for that year, the MCCVB Board may implement a cumulative increase at the next regularly scheduled rate increase. Because services shall remain constant for the Salinas Visitor Services program (brochures, maps, and information regarding local events for visitors), the additional rate of $0.50 per annum in Zone 2 shall not be increased over the life of the district. The biennial assessment

3 Government Code § 53758(a)
4 Cal. Const. art XIII C § 1(e)(2)
5 Government Code § 53758(b)
6 Government Code § 53758(b)
18 MCTID Management District Plan 14
November 2, 2022
increase shall be $0.90 per paid occupied room per night for luxury lodging businesses, $0.60 per paid occupied room per night for non-luxury full service lodging businesses, and $0.20 per paid occupied room per night for limited service lodging businesses. Based on the benefit received, assessments shall not be collected on: stays of more than thirty (30) consecutive days; stays at vacation time -share facilities; stays at vacation rentals; stays at RV parks; stays by any Federal or State of California officer or employee when on official business; and stays by any officer or employee of a foreign government who is exempt by reason of express provision of Federal law or international treaty. The assessment increase schedule is illustrated in the table below.

Zone 1 Zone 2
Fiscal
Year Luxury Non-Luxury
Full Service
Limited
Service Luxury Non-Luxury
Full Service
Limited
Service
2023-24 $ 7.00 $ 4.50 $ 1.50 $ 7.50 $ 5.00 $ 2.00 2024-25 $ 7.00 $ 4.50 $ 1.50 $ 7.50 $ 5.00 $ 2.00 2025-26 $ 7.90 $ 5.10 $ 1.70 $ 8.40 $ 5.60 $ 2.20 2026-27 $ 7.90 $ 5.10 $ 1.70 $ 8.40 $ 5.60 $ 2.20 2027-28 $ 8.80 $ 5.70 $ 1.90 $ 9.30 $ 6.20 $ 2.40 2028-29 $ 8.80 $ 5.70 $ 1.90 $ 9.30 $ 6.20 $ 2.40 2029-30 $ 9.70 $ 6.30 $ 2.10 $ 10.20 $ 6.80 $ 2.60 2030-31 $ 9.70 $ 6.30 $ 2.10 $ 10.20 $ 6.80 $ 2.60 2031-32 $ 10.60 $ 6.90 $ 2.30 $ 11.10 $ 7.40 $ 2.80 2032-33 $ 10.60 $ 6.90 $ 2.30 $ 11.10 $ 7.40 $ 2.80

The assessment is levied upon and a direct obligation of the assessed lodging business. However, the assessed lodging business may, at its discretion, pass the assessment on to transients. The amount of assessment, if passed on to each transient, shall be disclosed in advance and separately stated from the amount of rent charged and any other applicable taxes, and each transient shall receive a receipt for payment from the business. If the MCTID assessment is identified separately it shall be disclosed as the “MCTID Assessment.” As an alternative, the disclosure may in clude the amount of the MCTID assessment and the amount of the assessment imposed pursuant to the California Tourism Marketing Act, Government Code §13995 et seq. and shall be disclosed as the “Tourism Assessment.” The assessment is imposed solely upon, and is the sole obligation of, the assessed lodging business even if it is passed on to transients. The assessment shall not be considered revenue for any purpose, including calculation of transient occupancy taxes.

Bonds shall not be issued.

E. Penalties and Interest
The MCTID shall reimburse the cities and County for any costs associated with collecting unpaid assessments. If sums in excess of the delinquent MCTID assessment are sought to be recovered in the same collection action by the cities or County, the MCTID shall bear its pro rata share of such collection costs. Assessed businesses which are delinquent in paying the assessment shall be responsible for paying:

1. Original Delinquency: Any lodging business that fails to remit any assessment imposed within the time required shall pay a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount of the assessment in addition to the amount of the assessment or the estimated assessment.

2. Continued Delinquency: Any lodging business that fails to remit any delinquent assessment on or before a period of thirty (30) days following the date on which the assessment first became delinquent shall pay a second delinquency penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount of the 19 MCTID Management District Plan 15
November 2, 2022
assessment in addition to the amount of the assessment and the ten percent (10%) penalty first imposed.

3. Fraud: If the cities or County determine that the nonpayment of any remittance due is due to fraud, a penalty of twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the assessment shall be added thereto, in addition to the penalties stated in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this section.

4. Interest: In addition the penalties imposed, any lodging business that fails to remit any assessment imposed shall pay interest at the rate of one percent (1%) per month or fraction thereof on the amount of the assessment, exclusive of penalties, from the date on which the remittance first became delinquent until paid.

5. Penalties Merged with Assessment: Every penalty imposed and such interest as accrues under the provisions of this section shall become a part of the assessment required to be paid.

6. Audit Deficiency: If, upon audit by the cities or County, a lodging business is found to be deficient in either its return or its remittances or both, the cities or County shall immediately invoice the lodging business for the amount of the net deficiency plus a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the net deficiency. If the lodging business fails or refuses to pay the deficient amount and applicable penalties within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice, an additional ten percent (10%) penalty shall be added to the origi nal deficiency. In addition to the penalties imposed, any lodging business that fails to remit payment of billed audit deficiencies within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice shall pay interest at the rate of one percent (1%) per month or fraction thereof on the amount of the assessment, exclusive of penalties.

F. Time and Manner for Collecting Assessments
The MCTID assessment shall be implemented beginning July 1, 2023, or as soon as possible thereafter, and end ten (10) years from its start date. The cities and County shall be responsible for collecting the assessment on a monthly, bi-monthly or quarterly basis (including any delinquencies, penalties and interest) from each lodging b usiness located in their respective jurisdictions . The cities and County shall make all reasonable efforts to collect the assessments from each lodging business. The cities and County shall forward the assessments collected to the Owners’ Association, except for the additional assessments in Zones 2.
20 MCTID Management District Plan 16
November 2, 2022
V. GOVERNANCE

A. Owners’ Association
The Monterey City Council , through adoption of this Management District Plan, has the right, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §36651, to identify the body that shall implement the proposed program, which shall be the O wners’ Association of the MCTID as defined in Streets and Highways Code §36612. Monterey County Destination Marketing Organization, Inc. d.b.a. Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau (MCCVB) shall continue to serve as the Owners’ Association for the MCTID. The MCCVB Board’s TID Committee shall continue t o have full decision -making authority over the expenditure of MCTID funds. The TID Committee shall be comprised solely of assessed lodging business representatives. The number of seats on the TID Committee from each MCTID jurisdiction shall reflect the pro portional assessment revenue derived from each MCTID jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the forgoing, the City of Salinas shall have full decision-making authority over the expenditure of funds raised by the additional $0.50 assessment rate on all lodging busin ess types in Zone 2.

B. Brown Act and California Public Records Act Compliance An Owners’ Association is a private entity and may not be considered a public entity for any purpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be public officials for any purpose. The Owners’ Association is, however, subject to government regulations relating to transparency, namely the Ralph M. Brown Act and the California Public Records Act. These regulations are designed to promote public accountability. The Owners’ Association acts as a legislative body under the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code §54950 et seq.). Thus, meetings of the MCCVB board and certain committees must be held in compliance with the public notice and other requirements of the Brown Act. The Owners’ Association is also subject to the record keeping and disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. Accordingly, the Owners’ Association shall publicly report any action taken and the vote or abstention on that action of each member present for the action.

C. Annual Report
The MCCVB shall present an annual report at the end of each year of operation to the Monterey City Council pursuant to Streets and Highways Code §36650 (see Appendix 1) . The annual report shall include:
• Any proposed changes in the boundaries of the improvement district or in any benefit zones or classification of businesses within the district.
• The improvements and activities to be provided for that fiscal year. • An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements and the activities for that fiscal year. • The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient deta il to allow each business owner to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her business for that fiscal year.
• The estimated amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal year.
• The estimated amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied.

21 MCTID Management District Plan 17
November 2, 2022
APPENDIX 1 – LAW

*** THIS DOCUMENT IS CURRENT THROUGH THE 2022 SUPPLEMENT *** (ALL 2021 LEGISLATION)

STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
DIVISION 18. PARKING
PART 7. PROPERTY AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT LAW OF 1994

CHAPTER 1. General Provisions

ARTICLE 1. Declarations

36600. Citation of part

This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994.”

36601. Legislative findings and declarations; Legislative guidance

The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a) Businesses located and operating within business districts in some of this state’s communities are economically disadvantaged, are underutilized, and are unable to attract customers due to inadequate facilities, services, and activities in the business districts. (b) It is in the public interest to promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of business districts in order to create jobs, attract new businesses, and prevent the erosion of the business districts. (c) It is of particular local benefit to allow business districts to fund business related improvements, maintenance, and activities through the levy of assessments upon the businesses or real property that receive benefits from those improvements.
(d) Assessments levied for the purpose of conferring special benefit upon the real property or a specific benefit upon the businesses in a business district are not taxes for the general benefit of a city, even if property, businesses, or persons not assessed receive incidental or collateral effects that benefit them. (e) Property and business improvement districts formed throughout this state have conferred special benefits upon properties and businesses within their districts and have made those properties and businesses more useful by providing the following benefits:
(1) Crime reduction. A study by the Rand Corporation has confirmed a 12-percent reduction in the incidence of robbery and an 8-percent reduction in the total incidence of violent crimes within the 30 districts studied.
(2) Job creation.
(3) Business attraction.
(4) Business retention.
(5) Economic growth.
(6) New investments.
(f) With the dissolution of redevelopment agencies throughout the state, property and business improvement districts have become even more important tools with which communities can combat blight, promote economic opportunities, and create a clean and safe environment. (g) Since the enactment of this act, the people of California have adopted Proposition 218, which added Article XIII D to the Constitution in order to place certain requirements and restrictions on the formation of, and activities, expenditures, and assessments by property-based districts. Article XIII D of the Constitution provides that property-based districts may only levy assessments for special benefits. (h) The act amending this section is intended to provide the Legislature’s guidance with regard to this act, its interaction with the provisions of Article XIII D of the Constitution, and the determination of special benefits in property-based districts.
(1) The lack of legislative guidance has resulted in uncertainty and inconsistent application of this act, which discourages the use of assessments to fund needed improvements, maintenance, and activities in property-based districts, contributing to blight and other underutilization of property. (2) Activities undertaken for the purpose of conferring special benefits upon property to be assessed inherently produce incidental or collateral effects that benefit property or persons not assessed.

Therefore, for special benefits to exist as a separate and distinct category from general benefits, the 22 MCTID Management District Plan 18
November 2, 2022
incidental or collateral effects of those special benefits are inherently part of those special benefits.

The mere fact that special benefits produce incidental or collateral effects that benefit property or persons not assessed does not convert any portion of those special benefits or their incidental or collateral effects into general benefits.
(3) It is of the utmost importance that property-based districts created under this act have clarity regarding restrictions on assessments they may levy and the proper determination of special benefits.

Legislative clarity with regard to this act will provide districts with clear instructions and courts with legislative intent regarding restrictions on property-based assessments, and the manner in which special benefits should be determined.

36602. Purpose of part

The purpose of this part is to supplement previously enacted provisions of law that authorize cities to levy assessments within property and business improvement districts, to ensure that those assessments conform to all constitutional requirements and are determined and assessed in accordance with the guidance set forth in this act. This part does not affect or limit any other provisions of law authorizing or providing for the furnishing of improvements or activities or the raising of revenue for these purposes.

36603. Preemption of authority or charter city to adopt ordinances levying assessments

Nothing in this part is intended to preempt the authority of a charter city to adopt ordinances providing for a different method of levying assessments for similar or additional purposes from those set forth in this part. A property and business improvement district created pursuant to this part is expressly exempt from the provisions of the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 (Division 4 (commencing with Section 2800)).

36603.5. Part prevails over conflicting provisions

Any provision of this part that conflicts with any other provision of law shall prevail over the other provision of law, as to districts created under this part.

36604. Severability

This part is intended to be construed liberally and, if any provision is held invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Assessments levied under this part are not special taxes.

ARTICLE 2. Definitions

36606. “Activities”

“Activities” means, but is not limited to, all of the following that benefit businesses or real property in the district:
(a) Promotion of public events.
(b) Furnishing of music in any public place.
(c) Promotion of tourism within the district.
(d) Marketing and economic development, including retail retention and recruitment. (e) Providing security, sanitation, graffiti removal, street and sidewalk cleaning, and other municipal services supplemental to those normally provided by the municipality. (f) Other services provided for the purpose of conferring special benefit upon assessed real property or specific benefits upon assessed businesses located in the district.

36606.5. “Assessment”

“Assessment” means a levy for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, in stalling, or maintaining improvements and providing activities that will provide certain benefits to properties or businesses located within a property and business improvement district.

36607. “Business”

“Business” means all types of businesses and includes financial institutions and professions. 23 MCTID Management District Plan 19
November 2, 2022

36608. “City”

“City” means a city, county, city and county, or an agency or entity created pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code , the public member agencies of which includes only cities, counties, or a city and county, or the State of California.

36609. “City council”

“City council” means the city council of a city or the board of supervisors of a county, or the agency, commission, or board created pursuant to a joint powers agreement and which is a city within the meaning of this part.

36609.4. “Clerk”

“Clerk” means the clerk of the legislative body.

36609.5. “General benefit”

“General benefit” means, for purposes of a property-based district, any benefit that is not a “special benefit” as defined in Section 36615.5.

36610. “Improvement”

“Improvement” means the acquisition, construction, installation, or main tenance of any tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or more including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Parking facilities.
(b) Benches, booths, kiosks, display cases, pedestrian shelters and signs. (c) Trash receptacles and public restrooms.
(d) Lighting and heating facilities.
(e) Decorations.
(f) Parks.
(g) Fountains.
(h) Planting areas.
(i) Closing, opening, widening, or narrowing of existing streets. (j) Facilities or equipment, or both, to enhance security of persons and property within the district. (k) Ramps, sidewalks, plazas, and pedestrian malls.
(l) Rehabilitation or removal of existing structures.

36611. “Management district plan”; “Plan”

“Management district plan” or “plan” means a proposal as defined in Section 36622.

36612. “Owners’ association”

“Owners’ association” means a private nonprofit entity that is under contract with a city to administer or implement improvements, maintenance, and activities specified in the management district plan. An owners’ association may be an existing nonprofit entity or a newly formed nonprofit entity. An owners’ association is a private entity and may not be considered a public entity for any purpose, nor may its board members or staff be considered to be public officials for any purpose. Notwithstanding this section, an owners’ association shall comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code), at all times when matters within the subject matter of the district are heard, discussed, or deliberated, and with the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code), for all records relating to activities of the district.

36614. “Property”

“Property” means real property situated within a district.

24 MCTID Management District Plan 20
November 2, 2022
36614.5. “Property and business improvement district”; “District”

“Property and business improvement distri ct,” or “district,” means a property and business improvement district established pursuant to this part.

36614.6. “Property-based assessment”

“Property-based assessment” means any assessment made pursuant to this part upon real property.

36614.7. “Property-based district”

“Property-based district” means any district in which a city levies a property-based assessment.

36615. “Property owner”; “Business owner”; “Owner”

“Property owner” means any person shown as the owner of land on the last equalized assessment roll or otherwise known to be the owner of land by the city council. “Business owner” means any person recognized by the city as the owner of the business. “Owner” means either a business owner or a property owner. The city council has no obligation to obtain other information as to the ownership of land or businesses, and its determination of ownership shall be final and conclusive for the purposes of this part. Wherever this part requires the signature of the property owner, the signature of the authorized agent of the property owner shall be sufficient. Wherever this part requires the signature of the business owner, the signature of the authorized agent of the business owner shall be sufficient.

36615.5. “Special benefit”

“Special benefit” means, for purposes of a property -based district, a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in a district or to the public at large. Special benefit includes incidental or collateral effects that arise from the improvements, maintenance, or activities of property-based districts even if those incidental or collateral effects benefit property or persons not assessed. Special benefit excludes general enhancement of property value.

36616. “Tenant”

“Tenant” means an occupant pursuant to a lease of commercial space or a dwelling unit, other than an owner.

ARTICLE 3. Prior Law

36617. Alternate method of financing certain improvements and activities; Effect on other provisions

This part provides an alternative method of financing certain improvements and activities. The provisions of this part shall not affect or limit any other provisions of law authorizing or providing for the furnishing of improvements or activities or the raising of revenue for these purposes. Every improvement area established pursuant to the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500) of this division) is valid and effective and is unaffected by this part.

CHAPTER 2. Establishment

36620. Establishment of property and business improvement district

A property and business improvement district may be established as provided in this chapter.

36620.5. Requirement of consent of city council

A county may not form a district within the territorial jurisdiction of a city without the consent of the city council of that city. A city may not form a district within the unincorporated territory of a county without the consent of the board of supervisors of that county. A city may not form a district within the territorial jurisdiction of another city without the consent of the city council of the other city.

25 MCTID Management District Plan 21
November 2, 2022
36621. Initiation of proceedings; Petition of property or business owners in proposed district

(a) Upon the submission of a written petition, signed by the property or business owners in the proposed district who will pay more than 50 p ercent of the assessments proposed to be levied, the city council may initiate proceedings to form a district by the adoption of a resolution expressing its intention to form a district.

The amount of assessment attributable to property or a business owned by the same property or business owner that is in excess of 40 percent of the amount of all assessments proposed to be levied, shall not be included in determining whether the petition is signed by property or business owners who will pay more than 50 percent of the total amount of assessments proposed to be levied. (b) The petition of property or business owners required under subdivision (a) shall include a summary of the management district plan. That summary shall include all of the following:
(1) A map showing the boundaries of the district.
(2) Information specifying where the complete management district plan can be obtained. (3) Information specifying that the complete management district plan shall be furnished upon request.
(c) The resolution of intention described in subdivision (a) shall contain all of the following:
(1) A brief description of the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, the amount of the proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment will be levied on p roperty or businesses within the district, a statement as to whether bonds will be issued, and a description of the exterior boundaries of the proposed district, which may be made by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the clerk. The descriptions and statements do not need to be detailed and shall be sufficient if they enable an owner to generally identify the nature and extent of the improvements, maintenance, and activities, and the location and extent of the proposed district. (2) A time and place for a public hearing on the establishment of the property and business improvement district and the levy of assessments, which shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 36623.

36622. Contents of management district plan

The management district plan shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(a) If the assessment will be levied on property, a map of the district in sufficient detail to locate each parcel of property and, if businesses are to be assessed, each business within the district. If the assessment will be levied on businesses, a map that identifies the district boundaries in sufficient detail to allow a business owner to reasonably determine whether a business is located within the district boundaries. If the assessment will be levied on property and businesses, a map of the district in sufficient detail to locate each parcel of property and to allow a business owner to reasonably determine whether a business is located within the district boundaries.
(b) The name of the proposed district.
(c) A description of the boundaries of the district, inclu ding the boundaries of benefit zones, proposed for establishment or extension in a manner sufficient to identify the affected property and businesses included, which may be made by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the clerk. The boundaries of a proposed property assessment district shall not overlap with the boundaries of another existing property assessment district created pursuant to this part. This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a district created pursuant to this part to overlap with other assessment districts established pursuant to other provisions of law, including, but not limited to, the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (Part 6 (commencing with Section 36500)). This part does not prohibit the boundaries o f a business assessment district created pursuant to this part to overlap with another business assessment district created pursuant to this part. This part does not prohibit the boundaries of a business assessment district created pursuant to this part to overlap with a property assessment district created pursuant to this part. (d) The improvements, maintenance, and activities proposed for each year of operation of the district and the maximum cost thereof. If the improvements, maintenance, and activities proposed for each year of operation are the same, a description of the first year’s proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities and a statement that the same improvements, maintenance, and activities are proposed for subsequent years shall satisfy the requirements of this subdivision.
(e) The total annual amount proposed to be expended for improvements, maintenance, or activities, and debt service in each year of operation of the district. If the assessment is levied on businesses, this amount may be estimated based upon the assessment rate. If the total annual amount proposed to be expended in each year of operation of the district is not significantly different, the amount proposed to be expended in the initial 26 MCTID Management District Plan 22
November 2, 2022
year and a statement that a similar amount applies to subsequent years shall satisfy the requirements of this subdivision.
(f) The proposed source or sources of financing, including the proposed method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each property or business owner to calculate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her property or business. The plan also shall state whether bonds will be issued to finance improvements.
(g) The time and manner of collecting the assessments.
(h) The specific number of years in which assessments will be levied. In a new district, the maximum number of years shall be five. Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10 years. Notwithstanding these limitations, a district created pursuant to this part to finance capital improvements with bonds may levy assessments until the maximum maturity of the bonds. The management district plan may set forth specific increases in assessments for each year of operation of the district. (i) The proposed time for implementation and completion of the management district plan. (j) Any proposed rules and regulations to be applicable to the district. (k)
(1) A list of the properties or businesses to be assessed, including the assessor’s parcel numbers for properties to be assessed, and a statement of the method or methods by which the expenses of a district will be imposed upon benefited real property or businesses, in proportion to the benefit received by the property or business, to defray the cost thereof. (2) In a property-based district, the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined exclusively in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the activities. An assessment shall not be imposed on any parcel that exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable, and a property-based district shall separate the general benefits, if any, from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. Parcels within a property -based district that are owned or used by any city, public agency, the State of California, or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the governmental entity can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit. The value of any incidental, secondary, or collateral effects that arise from the improvements, maint enance, or activities of a property -based district and that benefit property or persons not assessed shall not be deducted from the entirety of the cost of any special benefit or affect the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel. (l) In a property -based district, the total amount of all special benefits to be conferred upon the properties located within the property-based district.
(m) In a property-based district, the total amount of general benefits, if any. (n) In a property -based district, a detailed engineer’s report prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California supporting all assessments contemplated by the management district plan. (o) Any other item or matter required to be incorporated therein by the city council.

36623. Procedure to levy assessment

(a) If a city council proposes to levy a new or increased property assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure shall comply with Section 53753 of the Government Code. (b) If a city council proposes to levy a new or increased business assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure shall comply with Section 54954.6 of the Government Code, except that notice shall be mailed to the owners of the businesses proposed to be assessed. A protest may be made orally or in writing by any interested person. Every written protest shall be filed with the clerk at or before the time fixed for the public hearing. The city council may waive any irregularity in the form or content of any written protest. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing. Each written protest shall contain a description of the business in which the person subscribing the protest is interested sufficient to identify the business and, if a person subscribing is not shown on the official records of the city as the owner of the business, the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person subscribing is the owner of the business or the authorized representative. A written protest that does not comply with this section shall not be counted in determining a majority protest. If written protests are received from the owners or authorized representatives of businesses in the proposed district that will pay 50 percent or more of the assessments proposed to be levied and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than 50 percent, no further proceedings to levy the proposed assessment against such 27 MCTID Management District Plan 23
November 2, 2022
businesses, as contained in the resolution of intention, shall be taken for a period of one year from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the city council. (c) If a city council proposes to conduct a single proceeding to levy both a new or increased property assessment and a new or increased business assessment, the notice and protest and hearing procedure for the property assessment shall comply with subdivision (a), and the notice and protest and hearing procedure for the business assessment shall comply with subdivision (b). If a majority protest is received from either the property or business owners, that re spective portion of the assessment shall not be levied. The remaining portion of the assessment may be levied unless the improvement or other special benefit was proposed to be funded by assessing both property and business owners.

36624. Changes to proposed assessments

At the conclusion of the public hearing to establish the district, the city council may adopt, revise, change, reduce, or modify the proposed assessment or the type or types of improvements, maintenance, and activities to be funded with the revenues from the assessments. Proposed assessments may only be revised by reducing any or all of them. At the public hearing, the city council may only make changes in, to, or from the boundaries of the proposed property and business improvement district that will exclude territory that will not benefit from the proposed impr ovements, maintenance, and activities. Any modifications, revisions, reductions, or changes to the proposed assessment district shall be reflected in the notice and map recorded pursuant to Section 36627.

36625. Resolution of formation

(a) If the city council, following the public hearing, decides to establish a proposed property and business improvement district, the city council shall adopt a resolution of formation that shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(1) A brief description of the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, the amount of the proposed assessment, a statement as to whether the assessment will be levied on property, businesses, or both within the district, a statement on whether bonds will be issued, and a description of the exterior boundaries of the proposed district, which may be made by reference to any plan or map that is on file with the clerk. The descriptions and statements need not be detailed and shall be sufficient if they enable an owner to generally identify the nature and extent of the improvements, maintenance, and activities and the location and extent of the proposed district. (2) The number, date of adoption, and title of the resolution of intention. (3) The time and place where the public hearing was held concerning the establishment of the district.
(4) A determination regarding any protests received. The city shall not establish the district or levy assessments if a majority protest was received.
(5) A statement that the properties, businesses, or properties and businesses in the district established by the resolution shall be subject to any amendments to this part. (6) A statement that the improvements, main tenance, and activities to be conferred on businesses and properties in the district will be funded by the levy of the assessments. The revenue from the levy of assessments within a district shall not be used to provide improvements, maintenance, or activities outside the district or for any purpose other than the purposes specified in the resolution of intention, as modified by the city council at the hearing concerning establishment of the district.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, improvements and activiti es that must be provided outside the district boundaries to create a special or specific benefit to the assessed parcels or businesses may be provided, but shall be limited to marketing or signage pointing to the district. (7) A finding that the property o r businesses within the area of the property and business improvement district will be benefited by the improvements, maintenance, and activities funded by the proposed assessments, and, for a property -based district, that property within the district will receive a special benefit.
(8) In a property -based district, the total amount of all special benefits to be conferred on the properties within the property-based district.
(b) The adoption of the resolution of formation and, if required, recordation of the notice and map pursuant to Section 36627 shall constitute the levy of an assessment in each of the fiscal years referred to in the management district plan.

36627. Notice and assessment diagram
28 MCTID Management District Plan 24
November 2, 2022

Following adoption of the resolution establishing district assessments on properties pursuant to Section 36625, the clerk shall record a notice and an assessment diagram pursuant to Section 3114. No other provision of Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 3100) applies to an assessment district created pursuant to this part.

36628. Establishment of separate benefit zones within district; Categories of businesses

The city council may establish one or more separate benefit zones within the district based upon the degree of benefit derived from the improvements or activities to be provided within the benefit zone and may impose a different assessment within each benefit zone. If the assessment is to be levied on businesses, the city council may also define categories of businesses based upon the degree of benefit that each will derive from the improvements or activities to be provided within the district and ma y impose a different assessment or rate of assessment on each category of business, or on each category of business within each zone.

36628.5. Assessments on businesses or property owners

The city council may levy assessments on businesses or on property owners, or a combination of the two, pursuant to this part. The city council shall structure the assessments in whatever manner it determines corresponds with the distribution of benefits from the proposed improvements, maintenance, and activities, provided that any property - based assessment conforms with the requirements set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (k) of Section 36622.

36629. Provisions and procedures applicable to benefit zones and business categories

All provisions of this part applicable to the establishment, modification, or disestablishment of a property and business improvement district apply to the establishment, modification, or disestablishment of benefit zones or categories of business. The city council shall, to establish, modify, or disestablish a benefit zone or category of business, follow the procedure to establish, modify, or disestablish a property and business improvement district.

36630. Expiration of district; Creation of new district

If a property and business improvement district expires due to the time limit set pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 36622, a new management district plan may be created and the district may be renewed pursuant to this part.

CHAPTER 3. Assessments

36631. Time and manner of collection of assessments; Delinquent payments

The collection of the assessments levied pursuant to this part shall be made at the time and in the manner set forth by the city council in the resolution levying the assessment. Assessments levied on real property may be collected at the same time and in the same manner as for the ad valorem property tax, and may provide for the same lien priority and penalties for delinquent payment. All delinquent payments for assessments levied pursuant to this part may be charged interest and penalties.

36632. Assessments to be based on estimated benefit; Classification of real property and businesses; Exclusion of residential and agricultural property

(a) The assessments levied on real property pursuant to this part shall be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the real property within the property and business improvement district. The city council may classify properties for purposes of determining the benefit to property of the improvements and activities provided pursuant to this part.
(b) Assessments levied on businesses pursuant to this part shall be levied on the basis of the estimated benefit to the businesses within the property and business improvement district. The city council may classify businesses for purposes of determining the benef it to the businesses of the improvements and activities provided pursuant to this part.
(c) Properties zoned solely for residential use, or that are zoned for agricultural use, are conclusively presumed not to benefit from the improvements and service funded through these assessments, and shall not be subject to any assessment pursuant to this part.
29 MCTID Management District Plan 25
November 2, 2022

36633. Time for contesting validity of assessment

The validity of an assessment levied under this part shall not be contested in an action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding is commenced within 30 days after the resolution levying the assessment is adopted pursuant to Section 36625. An appeal from a final judgment in an action or proceeding shall be perfected within 30 days after the entry of judgment.

36634. Service contracts authorized to establish levels of city services

The city council may execute baseline service contracts that would establish levels of city services that would continue after a property and business improvement district has been formed.

36635. Request to modify management district plan

The owners’ association may, at any time, request that the city council modify the management district plan. Any modification of the management district plan shall be made pursuant to this chapter.

36636. Modification of plan by resolution after public hearing; Adoption of resolution of intention

(a) Upon the written request of the owners’ association, the city council may modify the management district plan after conducting one public hearing on the proposed modifications. The city council may modify the improvements and activities to be funded with the revenue derived from the levy of the assessments by adopting a resolution determining to make the modifications after holding a public hearing on the proposed modifications. If the modification includes the levy of a new or increased assessment, the city council shall comply with Section 36623. Notice of all other public hearings pursuant to this section shall comply with both of the following:
(1) The resolution of intention shall be published in a newspaper of general ci rculation in the city once at least seven days before the public hearing.
(2) A complete copy of the resolution of intention shall be mailed by first class mail, at least 10 days before the public hearing, to each business owner or property owner affected by the proposed modification.
(b) The city council shall adopt a resolution of intention which states the proposed modification prior to the public hearing required by this section. The public hearing shall be held not more than 90 days after the adoption of the resolution of intention.

36637. Reflection of modification in notices recorded and maps

Any subsequent modification of the resolution shall be reflected in subsequent notices and maps recorded pursuant to Division 4.5 (commencing with Section 3100), in a manner consistent with the provisions of Section 36627.

CHAPTER 3.5. Financing

36640. Bonds authorized; Procedure; Restriction on reduction or termination of assessments

(a)The city council may, by resolution, determine and declare that bonds shall be issued to finance the estimated cost of some or all of the proposed improvements described in the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to Section 36625, if the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to that section provides for the issuance of bonds, under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10 (commencing with Section 8500)) or in conjunction with Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985 (Article 4 (commencing with Section 6584) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code). Either act, as the case may be, shall govern the proceedings relating to the issuance of bonds, although proceedings under the Bond Act of 1915 may be modified by the city council as necessary to accommodate assessments levied upon business pursuant to this part.
(b) The resolution adopted pursuant to subdivision ( a) shall generally describe the proposed improvements specified in the resolution of formation adopted pursuant to Section 36625, set forth the estimated cost of those improvements, specify the number of annual installments and the fiscal years during which they are to 30 MCTID Management District Plan 26
November 2, 2022
be collected. The amount of debt service to retire the bonds shall not exceed the amount of revenue estimated to be raised from assessments over 30 years.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, assessments levied to pay the principal and interest on any bond issued pursuant to this section shall not be reduced or terminated if doing so would interfere with the timely retirement of the debt.

CHAPTER 4. Governance

36650. Report by owners’ association; Approval or modification by city council

(a) The owners’ association shall cause to be prepared a report for each fiscal year, except the first year, for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the improvements, maintenance, and activities described in the report. The owners’ association’s first report shall be due after the first year of operation of the district. The report may propose changes, including, but not limited to, the boundaries of the property and business improvement district or any benefit zones within the district, the basis and method of levying the assessments, and any changes in the classification of property, including any categories of business, if a classification is used.
(b) The report shall be filed with the clerk and shall refer to the property and business improvement district by name, specify the fiscal year to which the report applies, and, with respect to that fiscal year, shall contain all of the following information:
(1) Any proposed changes in the boundaries of the property and business improvement district or in any benefit zones or classification of property or businesses within the district. (2) The improvements, maintenance, and activities to be provided for that fiscal year. (3) An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements, maintenance, and activities for that fiscal year.
(4) The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each real property or business owner, as appropriate, to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her property or business for that fiscal year.
(5) The estimated amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous fiscal year.
(6) The estimated amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied pursuant to this part.
(c) The city council may approve the report as filed by the owners’ association or may modify any particular contained in the report and approve it as modified. Any modification shall be made pursuant to Sections 36635 and 36636.

The city council shall not approve a change in the basis and method of levying assessments that would impair an authorized or executed contract to be paid from the revenues derived from the levy of assessments, including any commitment to pay principal and interest on any bonds issued on behalf of the district.

36651. Designation of owners’ association to provide improvements, maintenance, and activities

The managemen t district plan may, but is not required to, state that an owners’ association will provide the improvements, maintenance, and activities described in the management district plan. If the management district plan designates an owners’ association, the city shall contract with the designated nonprofit corporation to provide services.

CHAPTER 5. Renewal

36660. Renewal of district; Transfer or refund of remaining revenues; District term limit

(a) Any district previously established whose term has expired, or will expire, may be renewed by following the procedures for establishment as provided in this chapter. (b) Upon renewal, any remaining revenues derived from the levy of assessments, or any revenues derived from the sale of assets acquired with the revenues, shall be transferred to the renewed district. If the renewed district includes additional parcels or businesses not included in the prior district, the remaining revenues shall be spent to benefit only the parcels or businesses in the prior district. If the renewed district does not include parcels or businesses included in the prior district, the remaining revenues attributable to these parcels shall be refunded to the owners of these parcels or businesses. 31 MCTID Management District Plan 27
November 2, 2022
(c) Upon renewal, a district shall have a term not to exceed 10 years, or, if the district is authorized to issue bonds, until the maximum maturity of those bonds. There is no requirement that the boundaries, assessments, improvements, or activities of a renewed district be the same as the original or prior district.

CHAPTER 6. Disestablishment

36670. Circumstances permitting disestablishment of district; Procedure

(a) Any district established or extended pursuant to the provisions of this part, where there is no indebtedness, outstanding and unpaid, incurred to accomplish any of the purposes of the district, may be disestablished by resolution by the city council in either of the following circumstances:
(1) If the city council finds there has been misappropriation of funds, malfeasance, or a violation of law in connection with the management of the district, it shall notice a hearing on disestablishment. (2) During the operation of the district, there shall be a 30-day period each year in which assessees may request disestablishment of the district. The first such period shall begin one year after the date of establishment of the district and shall continue for 30 days. The next such 30 -day period shall begin two years after the date of the establishment of the district. Each successive year of operation of the district shall have such a 30-day period. Upon the written petition of the owners or authorized representatives of real property or the owners or authorized representatives of businesses in the district who pay 50 percent or more of the assessments levied, the city council shall pass a resolution of intention to disestablish the district. The city council shall notice a hearing on disestablishment. (b) The city council shall adopt a resolution of intention to disestablish the district prior to the public hearing required by this section. The resolution shall state the reason for the disestablishment, shall state the time and place of the public hearing, and shall contain a proposal to dispose of any assets acquired with the revenues of the assessments levied within the property and business improvement district. The notice of the hearing on disestablishment required by this section shall be given by mail to the property owner of each parcel or to the owner of each business subject to assessment in the district, as appropriate. The city shall conduct the public hearing not less than 30 days after mailing the notice to the property or business owners. The public hearing shall be held not more than 60 days after the adoption of the resolution of intention.

36671. Refund of remaining revenues upon disestablishment or expiration without renewal of district; Calculation of refund; Use of outstanding revenue collected after disestablishment of district

(a) Upon the disestablishment or expiration without renewal of a district, a ny remaining revenues, after all outstanding debts are paid, derived from the levy of assessments, or derived from the sale of assets acquired with the revenues, or from bond reserve or construction funds, shall be refunded to the owners of the property or businesses then located and operating within the district in which assessments were levied by applying the same method and basis that was used to calculate the assessments levied in the fiscal year in which the district is disestablished or expires. All o utstanding assessment revenue collected after disestablishment shall be spent on improvements and activities specified in the management district plan. (b) If the disestablishment occurs before an assessment is levied for the fiscal year, the method and basis that was used to calculate the assessments levied in the immediate prior fiscal year shall be used to calculate the amount of any refund.

32 MCTID Management District Plan 28
November 2, 2022
APPENDIX 2 – ASSESSED BUSINESSES

Business Name Business Address City/State/Zip Type
ABV Presidents Inn MUNRAS MTY 1150 MUNRAS AVE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Adams Motel/Boronda Inn 2086 N. Main St. Salinas, CA 93906 Limited ADOBE INN 1919 GRAND CANAL BL.#B5 STOCKTON CA 95207 Full Aloha Motel 235 Kern St. Salinas, CA 93905 Limited
ANDRIL MOTEL & COTTAGES 569 ASILOMAR BLVD PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-3701 Limited ARAMARK Sports & Entertainment 800 ASILOMAR BLVD PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-3704 Limited AUBERGE CARMEL PO BOX J CARMEL CA 93921 Luxury
BAYSIDE INN 2055 NORTH FREMONT ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited BEACHCOMBER INN 1996 SUNSET DR PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-3787 Limited Bernardus Lodge 415 W CARMEL VALLEY RD Carmel Valley, CA 93924-9417 Luxury Best 5 Motel/Lakshmi Hotel Group 1010 Fairview Ave. Salinas, CA 93905 Limited BEST WESTERN DE ANZA INN 2141 NORTH FREMONT ST MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Best Western Marina State Beach 3290 DUNES DR MARINA, CA 93933 Limited BEST WESTERN MONTEREY INN 825 ABREGO MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Best Western Salinas
Monterey/Western Hotel Corp 175 Kern St. Salinas, CA 93905 Limited Best Western Salinas Valley Inn 187 Kern St. Salinas, CA 93905 Limited BEST WESTERN INN AND SUITES 4258 CESAR CHAVEZ ST San Francisco, CA 94131-1815 Limited BEST WESTERN-PARK CREST 1100 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited BIDE A WEE INN AND COTTAGES 221 ASILOMAR BLVD PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2093 Limited Big Sur Campground & Cabins 47000 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9556 Limited Big Sur Lodge 47225 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9542 Full Big Sur River Inn 46800 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9693 Full

BLU PACIFIC HOTEL (FORMERLY
COMFORT INN-MTY BAY) 2050 NO. FREMONT ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Blue Sky Lodge 10 FLIGHT RD Carmel Valley, CA 93924-9617 Limited BORGS MOTEL 1315 SKYVIEW DR BURLINGAME, CA 94010-6236 Limited Budget Inn Motel/BMN LLC 219 John St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited BUTTERFLY GROVE INN 1073 LIGHTHOUSE AVE PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2357 Limited Cabana Holiday 8710 Prunedale North Rd SALINAS, CA 93907-1371 Limited California Inn Motel 736 N. Main St. Salinas, CA 93906 Limited CANDLE BAY INN 2118 NO. FREMONT ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited CANDLELIGHT INN P.O. Box 101 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited CANNERY ROW INN 200 FOAM ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Capitol Motel/Jainika Corporation 2110 N. Main St. Salinas, CA 93906 Limited Captain's Inn At Moss Landing 8122 MOSS LANDING RD Moss Landing, CA 95039-9617 Limited CARMEL BAY VIEW INN 700 UNIVERSITY AV.#150 SACRAMENTO CA 95825 Limited CARMEL COTTAGE INN PO BOX 5805 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited CARMEL COUNTRY INN PO BOX 3756 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited CARMEL FIREPLACE INN INC. P.O. BOX 5245 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited CARMEL GARDEN INN PO BOX 5547 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited CARMEL GREEN LANTERN INN PO BOX 1114 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited 33 MCTID Management District Plan 29
November 2, 2022
CARMEL INN & SUITES P.O. BOX 1295 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited CARMEL LODGE P.O.BOX 4235 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
Carmel Mission Inn 3665 RIO RD CARMEL, CA 93923-8609 Full CARMEL OAKS INN P.O. BOX 3696 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited CARMEL RESORT INN P.O. BOX 2106 MONTEREY CA 93942 Limited Carmel River Inn 26600 OLIVER RD CARMEL, CA 93923-9219 Limited CARMEL TRADEWINDS INN P. O. BOX 3403 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited Carmel Valley Lodge 8 FORD RD Carmel Valley, CA 93924-9511 Limited Carmel Valley Manor 8545 CARMEL VALLEY RD CARMEL, CA 93923-9556 Full Carmel Valley Ranch 1 OLD RANCH RD CARMEL, CA 93923-8551 Luxury CARMEL WAYFARER INN P.O. BOX 1896 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited CARMEL'S TOWN HOUSE LODGE P.O. BOX 3574 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited CARRIAGE HOUSE INN PO BOX 101 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited Casa Linda Motel 1109 N. Main St. Salinas, CA 93906 Limited CASA MUNRAS HOTEL 700 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full Casa Palmero 1518 CYPRESS DR PEBBLE BEACH, CA 93953 Luxury CASA VERDE INN 2113 NO. FREMONT ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited CENTRELLA INN 612 CENTRAL AVE PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2611 Limited Ciudad Del Rey Motel 50620 MESA VERDE RD KING CITY, CA 93930 Limited CLARION HOTEL 1046 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited COACHMAN'S INN PO BOX 3073 MONTEREY CA 93940 Limited COLTON INN 707 PACIFIC ST MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited
COMFORT INN 140 RESERVATION RD MARINA, CA 93933-2522 Limited Comfort Inn & Suites/Shakti LLC 181 Kern St. Salinas, CA 93905 Limited Comfort Inn Monterey Airport 1200 OLMSTED RD MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited COMFORT INN-CARMEL BY THE SEA P.O. BOX 3838 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited Contenta Inn 20 VIA CONTENTA Carmel Valley, CA 93924-9501 Limited Continental Motel 1165 N. Main St. Salinas, CA 93906 Limited COUNTRY INN & SUITES 3288 DUNES DR MARINA, CA 93933 Limited Country Inn/Meldi Inc 126 John St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited Courtyard Salinas 17225 EL RANCHO WAY SALINAS, CA 93907-1732 Limited CVI INVESTORS PO BOX 3185 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
CVI INVESTORS PO BOX 3185 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
CYPRESS INN P.O. Box Y CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
Days Inn 1130 Broadway St KING CITY, CA 93930 Limited
DAYS INN 1288 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited DAYS INN - SAN CARLOS 850 ABREGO MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited DEER HAVEN INN 750 CROCKER AVE PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-3727 Limited Deetjen's Big Sur Inn 48865 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9512 Full Discovery Inn 1106 Fremont Blvd. Seaside, CA 93955 Limited

ECONO LODGE (MONTEREY
FAIRGROUNDS INN) 2042 NO. FREMONT ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited EconoLodge Bay Breeze Inn 2049 Fremont Blvd Seaside, CA 93955 Limited Economy Inn 214 John St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited
Economy Inn 1131 Fremont Blvd. Seaside, CA 93955 Limited 34 MCTID Management District Plan 30
November 2, 2022
EL CASTELL MOTEL 2102 NORTH FREMONT MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited El Dorado Motel/Café Main Street 1351 N. Main Salinas, CA 93906 Limited El Rey Motel 443 W. Market St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited El Sombrero Motel/Ramesh J. Patel 210 Abbott St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited Embassy Suites 1441 Canyon Del Rey Blvd. Seaside, CA 93955 Full Esalen Institute 55000 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9546 Full Fairview Inn 1060 Fairview Ave. Salinas, CA 93905 Limited Fernwood Resort 47200 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9542 Limited Fireside Inn 640 Broadway St KING CITY, CA 93930 Limited FOREST LODGE PO BOX 6286 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
Gateway Lodge 1909 Fremont Blvd. #3128 Seaside, CA 93955 Limited Glen Oaks Big Sur 47080 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9556 Limited Gorda Cabin Rental 7801 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920 Limited GOSBY HOUSE INN 643 LIGHTHOUSE AVE PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2691 Limited GREEN GABLES INN PO BOX 3073 MONTEREY, CA 93942-3080 Limited H.I. Resort Condominium Assoc, Inc 120 HIGHLAND DR CARMEL, CA 93923-9607 Full Hacienda House 505 CORRAL DE TIERRA RD SALINAS, CA 93908-8950 Limited HAMPTON INN 17777 Center Court Dr. #725 MARINA, CA 93933 Limited Hampton Inn & Suites/Salinas Hotel
Investors 523 Work St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited
HAMPTON INN (formerly LaQuinta) 2401 DEL MONTE AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited HHLP SANCTUARY ASSOCIATES 3295 DUNES RD MARINA, CA 93933-2002 Full Hidden Valley Inn 102 W CARMEL VALLEY RD Carmel Valley, CA 93924-9573 Limited Highlands Inn 140 HIGHLAND DR CARMEL, CA 93923-9607 Limited HILTON GARDEN INN 1000 AGUAJITO RD MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full HOFSAS HOUSE INC. P.O. BOX 1195 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited Holiday Inn Express 1400 Del Monte Blvd. Seaside, CA 93955 Limited HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS 443 WAVE STREET MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Holiday Inn Express & Suites 195 Kern St. Salinas, CA 93905 Limited Holiday Inn Express & Suites
Marina 189 SEASIDE AVE MARINA, CA 93933-2505 Limited
Holman Ranch, LLC 60 HOLMAN RD Carmel Valley, CA 93924-9620 Limited HOME 2 SUITES 1534 Fremont Blvd Suite D MARINA, CA 93933 Limited HORIZON INN P. O. BOX 1693 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
HOTEL 1110 1110 DEL MONTE AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited HOTEL ABREGO 755 ABREGO ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full
HOTEL CARMEL 8000 S Arizona Grand Pkwy PHOENIX AZ 85044 Limited HOTEL PACIFIC 300 PACIFIC STREET MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited HOWARD JOHNSON 416 RESERVATION RD MARINA, CA 93933-3320 Limited Howard Johnson Inn/Ambakari, Inc 131 John St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited HYATT REGENCY MONTEREY ONE OLD GOLF COURSE RD. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full IHG ARMY POM Presidio of Monterey MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full Inn at King City 4 Broadway Cir. KING CITY, CA 93930 Limited Inn At Moss Landing Point 8425 MOSS LANDING RD D Moss Landing, CA 95039-9679 Limited 35 MCTID Management District Plan 31
November 2, 2022
Inn At Spanish Bay, Attn: David
Hoopingarner 2700 17 MILE DR PEBBLE BEACH, CA 93953 Luxury Inn at the Pinnacles 32025 Stonewall Canyon Rd SOLEDAD, CA 93960 Limited INN BY THE BAY MONTEREY 936 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Inns of California 1215 De La Torre Salinas, CA 93905 Limited INTERCONTINENTAL – The Clement 750 CANNERY ROW MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full JABBERWOCK 598 LAINE ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited
Keefers Inn 615 Canal St KING CITY, CA 93930 Limited
LA PLAYA HOTEL 8000 S Arizona Grand Pkwy PHOENIX AZ 85044 Luxury LAGUNA LODGE 430 RESERVATION RD MARINA, CA 93933-3320 Limited LAMPLIGHTER INN PO BOX 6286 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited Laurel Inn 801 W. Laurel Dr. Salinas, CA 93906 Limited
Lincoln Green Inn 26200 CARMELO ST CARMEL, CA 93923-9134 Limited LOBOS LODGE P.O. Box L-1 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
LONE OAK MOTEL 2221 NO. FREMONT ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Los Laureles Lodge 313 W CARMEL VALLEY RD Carmel Valley, CA 93924-9415 Full LOVERS POINT INN 9600 Blue Larkspur Ln Ste 101 MONTEREY, CA 93940-6585 Limited Lucia Lodge 62400 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9533 Limited MARIPOSA INN 1386 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited MARRIOTT SPRINGHILL SUITES 215 10TH ST MARINA, CA 93933-6004 Limited MARTINE INN PO BOX 330 PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-0321 Limited MERRITT HOUSE 386 PACIFIC ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Mission Ranch 26270 DOLORES ST CARMEL, CA 93923-9218 Full Monarch Inn 633 Broadway St. KING CITY, CA 93930 Limited MONARCH RESORT 1111 LIGHTHOUSE AVE PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2312 Limited MONTE VERDE INN PO BOX 394 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
MONTE VERDE INN EAST P.O.BOX 394 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited MONTEREY BAY INN 242 CANNERY ROW MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited MONTEREY BAY LODGE 55 CAMINO AGUAJITO MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited MONTEREY FIREPLACE INN 2362 N. Fremont MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited MONTEREY FIRESIDE MOTEL 1131 TENTH ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited MONTEREY HOSTEL 778 HAWTHORNE ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited MONTEREY HOTEL 406 ALVARADO MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited
MONTEREY MARRIOTT 350 CALLE PRINCIPAL MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full MONTEREY OCEANSIDE INN 2030 DEL MONTE AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited MONTEREY PENINSULA INN 1101 LIGHTHOUSE AVE PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2312 Limited Monterey Pines Inn 1298 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited MONTEREY PLAZA 400 CANNERY ROW MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full
MONTEREY SURF INN 1200 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited MONTEREY TIDES HOTEL 2600 SAND DUNES DRIVE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full MOTEL 6 2124 NORTH FREMONT MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited
Motel 6 #0639/G6 Hospitality
Property LLC 1257 De La Torre Salinas, CA 93905 Limited MOTEL 6 #1026 100 RESERVATION RD MARINA, CA 93933-2517 Limited 36 MCTID Management District Plan 32
November 2, 2022
Motel 6 #1370/G6 Hospitality
Property LLC 140 Kern St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited
MOTEL 6 MONTEREY DOWNTOWN 1240 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Motel 6 Soledad 152 San Felipe Rd Soledad CA 93960 Limited Mountain Paradise 17717 CACHAGUA RD Carmel Valley, CA 93924-9319 Limited MUNRAS INN 1010 MUNRAS AVE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited
NORMANDY INN 700 UNIVERSITY AV.#150 SACRAMENTO CA 95925 Limited OCEAN VIEW LODGE P. O. BOX 1693 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited OCM LIGHTHOUSE LODGE LLC 1150 LIGHTHOUSE AVE PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2360 Limited OLD MARINA INN 3110 DEL MONTE BLVD MARINA, CA 93933-3049 Limited OLD MONTEREY INN 500 MARTIN STREET MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited OLD SAINT ANGELA INN 321 CENTRAL AVE PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2934 Limited OLYMPIA MOTOR LODGE PO BOX 51907 PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-6907 Limited Pacific Best Inn 1141 Fremont Blvd. Seaside, CA 93955 Limited PACIFIC GARDENS INN 701 ASILOMAR BLVD PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-3701 Limited PACIFIC GROVE INN PO BOX 2106 MONTEREY, CA 93942-2215 Limited PACIFIC GROVE PLAZA PO BOX 476 PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-0476 Limited PACIFIC INN MONTEREY 2332 NORTH FREMONT ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited PADRE OAKS MOTEL 1278 MUNRAS AVE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Pal Rest Easy LLC 196 Infantry RD Fort Hunter Liggett, CA 93928 Limited Parkfield Inn 70403 PARKFIELD RD SAN MIGUEL, CA 93451 Limited PELICAN INN 2058 NO. FREMONT ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Pessagno Winery 1645 RIVER RD SALINAS, CA 93908-8751 Limited PINE ACRES LODGE 1380 LEAD HILL BLVD 201 ROSEVILLE, CA 95661-2997 Limited PINE INN P.O. Box 250 CARMEL CA 93921 Full
PORTOLA HOTEL & SPA 2 PORTOLA PLAZA MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full Post Ranch Inn 47900 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9576 Luxury Prunedale Motor Lodge 1017 EL CAMINO REAL N PRUNEDALE, CA 93907-3359 Limited Prunedale Motor Lodge Cabins 1017 EL CAMINO REAL N PRUNEDALE, CA 93907-3359 Limited Quail Lodge And Golf Club 8205 VALLEY GREENS DR CARMEL, CA 93923-9512 Luxury Quality Inn 1190 Broadway St. KING CITY, CA 93930 Limited QUALITY INN - FAIRGROUNDS 2075 NO. FREMONT ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited QUALITY INN - MUNRAS (Arbor Inn) 1058 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Quality Inn/Om Namah 144 Kern St Salinas, CA 93905 Limited RAMADA INN 323 RESERVATION RD MARINA, CA 93933-3218 Limited RAMADA LTD. CARMEL HILL 1182 CASS STREET MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited

RED LION INN (FORMERLY BAY
PARK HOTEL) 1425 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full
RED ROOF INN 2227 N FREMONT ST MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Residence Inn Salinas 17215 EL RANCHO WAY SALINAS, CA 93907-1732 Limited Rex Motel/Parshottambhai M Ahir 305 Kern St. Salinas, CA 93905 Limited Ripplewood Resort 47047 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920 Full Riverside Campground 47020 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9556 Limited RODEWAY INN 2041 FREMONT ST MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited
Rodeway Inn (Formerly Knights Inn) 1374 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited 37 MCTID Management District Plan 33
November 2, 2022
ROSEDALE INN 4781 SAN LUCAS WAY SAN JOSE, CA 95135-2345 Limited Sai Enterprises DBA Motel 6 3 Broadway Cir. KING CITY, CA 93930 Limited Salinas Travel Inn/MJ Nahal Inc 425 Monterey St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited Salinas Valley Motel/Aatray Hotels,
Inc/BAPS LLC 2100 N. Main St. Salinas, CA 93906 Limited Sand Castle Inn 1011 La Salle Ave. Seaside, CA 93955 Limited Sand Dollar Inn (formerly Magic
Carpet Inn) 1875 Fremont Blvd Seaside, CA 93955 Limited Sandpiper Inn 2408 BAY VIEW AVE CARMEL, CA 93923-9118 Limited SEA VIEW INN 35 W.POPLAR AV. SAN MATEO CA 94402 Limited SeaLamp Inn 2201 Del Monte Blvd. Seaside, CA 93955 Limited Seaside Inn 1986 Del Monte Blvd. Seaside, CA 93955 Limited SEVEN GABLES INN 301 N CANON DR STE 302 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-4724 Limited Silver Saddle 705 Broadway St KING CITY, CA 93930 Limited Soledad Motel 8 1013 Front St Soledad CA 93960 Limited
SPINDRIFT INN 652 CANNERY ROW MONTEREY, CA 93940 Full
STAGE COACH LODGE 1111 10 ST MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Steinbeck Lodge/Travelodge/J S Inc 109 John St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited STONEHOUSE INN 5130 COMMERCIAL CIRCLE CONCORD CA 94520 Limited Stonepine Estate Resort 150 E CARMEL VALLEY RD Carmel Valley, CA 93924-9605 Full SUNSET HOUSE PO BOX 6286 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
SUNSET INN 133 ASILOMAR BLVD PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2094 Limited SUPER 8 - FREMONT 2120 NO. FREMONT ST. MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited SUPER 8 - MUNRAS 1300 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Super 8/Ram Hotels LLC 131 Kern St. Salinas, CA 93906 Limited Sure Stay Hotel 1893 Fremont Blvd. Seaside, CA 93955 Limited SVENDSGAARD'S INN PO BOX 101 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
TALLY HO INN P.O. Box 3726 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited Tehama Golf Club, LLC 25000 Via Malpaso Canada
Woods CARMEL, CA 93923 Limited
THE BRIARWOOD INN PO BOX 5245 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited THE BRIARWOOD INN II PO BOX 5245 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited THE COLONIAL TERRACE P.O. BOX 1375 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited The Holly Farm 9200 CARMEL VALLEY RD CARMEL, CA 93923-9574 Limited THE HOMESTEAD 26270 DOLORES ST. CARMEL CA 93923 Limited The Inn at 1252 Monterey 1252 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited The Inn at 1252 Monterey 1262 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited The Lodge At Pebble Beach Attn:

David Hoopingarner 1500 CYPRESS DR PEBBLE BEACH, CA 93953 Luxury THE SEA BREEZE INN 1100 LIGHTHOUSE AVE PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2362 Limited THE STEVENSON MONTEREY 675 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited THE VAGABOND'S HOUSE PO BOX 2747 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited Thunderbird Motel 1933 Fremont Blvd. #3128 Seaside, CA 93955 Limited Tickle Pink Motor Inn 155 HIGHLAND DR CARMEL, CA 93923-9601 Limited TRAVELODGE - FAIRGROUNDS 2030 N. FREMONT ST MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited 38 MCTID Management District Plan 34
November 2, 2022
Treebones Resort 71895 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9573 Limited Vendange Carmel Inn & Suites 24815 CARPENTER ST CARMEL, CA 93923 Limited Ventana Big Sur 48123 HIGHWAY 1 BIG SUR, CA 93920-9538 Luxury VICTORIAN INN 487 FOAM STREET MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited

VILLA FRANCA (FORMERLY EL
DORADO INN) 900 MUNRAS AVENUE MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited Vision Quest Safari Bed & Breakfast 400 RIVER RD SALINAS, CA 93908-9627 Limited Wagon Wheel Motel 1217 N. Main St. Salinas, CA 93906 Limited

WAVE STREET INN (PREVIOUSLY
OTTER INN) 571 WAVE ST MONTEREY, CA 93940 Limited
WAYSIDE INN PO BOX 101 CARMEL CA 93921 Limited
Western Motel/Western Skylodge
LLC 6 S. Wood St. Salinas, CA 93906 Limited
WILKIES INN 1038 LIGHTHOUSE AVE PACIFIC GROVE, CA 93950-2424 Limited Willow Lodge 719 S. Main St. Salinas, CA 93901 Limited
Zen Mtn Center/Tassajar Springs
C/O Ccao Controlle 39171 TASSAJARA RD CARMEL VALLEY, CA 93924- 9316 Limited

*List as of October 2022
39 MCTID Management District Plan 35
November 2, 2022
APPENDIX 3 – BENEFITS BY HOTEL TYPE

PROGRAMS / ACTIVITIES Luxury
Non-
Luxury
Full
Service
Limited
Service
General: Inclusion in Sales, Marketing, and Promotional Opportunities* X X X General: Listing on www.SeeMonterey.com with direct link to hotel page X X X General: Inclusion on SeeMonterey Online travel planning app X X X General: Inclusion on SeeMonterey Consumer Brochures X X X General: Access to SeeMonterey research reports and insights X X X General: Represented by SeeMonterey at industry conferences & events X X X Consumer: Opportunity to participate in Consumer Marketing Campaigns X X X Consumer: Public Relations participation opportunities X X X Consumer: Familiarization Tour (Press & Influencer) Opportunities X X X Consumer: Inclusion Opportunity in Social Media Efforts X X X Consumer: Inclusion Opportunity in Destination Video & Photo Shoots X X X Consumer: New project & special event opportunities X X X Travel Trade: Trade Show Opportunities X X X
Travel Trade: Sales Mission Opportunities X X X
Travel Trade: Lead Opportunities X X X
Travel Trade: Familiarization Tour Leads (Press & Travel Trade) Opportunities X X X
Meetings/Group: Brochure Inclusion (Mention) X X X
Meetings/Group: Familiarization Tours X X
Meetings/Group: Tradeshow Participation X X
Meetings/Group: Site Inspections X X
Meetings/Group: Marketing Campaigns X X
Meetings/Group: Brochure Inclusion (Full Page) X X
Inclusion in SeeMonterey destination partnership with Virtuoso Network X 40 MCTID Management District Plan 36
November 2, 2022
Representation a luxury travel conferences (e.g. ILTM) X Representation at VCA luxury travel week X
Featured in Luxury Advertising Campaign X
Featured in Luxury Public Relations Campaign X
* Each property that meets the minimum criteria of the client, journalist, or meeting planner will be promoted.

41 MCTID Management District Plan 37
November 2, 2022
APPENDIX 4 - TOURISM ECONOMICS STUDY

42 2
Introduction
Monterey visitor economy: overview and trends
MCCVB performance
Growing the visitor economy
Competitive funding analysis
Impact of TID funding on Monterey’s economy
Appendix 1: The impact of TIDs
Appendix 2: The ROI of destination marketing
1 2
3 4
5 6

TABLE OF

CONTENTS
43 Introduction1
44 4
In 2019, visitors to Monterey County spent a total of $3.2 billion locally and booked 3.1 million rooms. Total visitor spending increased 43% from 2011 to 2019. The revenue generated by the Monterey County Tourism Improvement District (TID) and the work performed by the Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau (MCCVB) is a major factor in this accelerated growth.

This report provides a comprehensive overview of the TID and its impact on Monterey’s tourism sector and overall economy. It highlights key trends over the past decade and quantifies how TID funding benefits hotels across the county.

Right now, Monterey is experiencing a strong recovery from the pandemic. Continued support and a renewal of the TID will support these trends into the future and ensure that the county’s visitor economy reaches its full potential.

Introduction
45 5
In 2019, visitors spent
$3.2 billion in Monterey
County, supporting
40,480 jobs and $2.1
billion in local income
(including direct,
indirect, and induced
impacts).

Key findings
From 2011 to 2019,
spending in Monterey
increased 43%, faster
than the state and
region.

MCCVB’s group sales
team was increasing its
bookings prior to the
pandemic and provided
an ROI of 14-1.

MCCVB sales and
marketing are integral
to increasing spending
per visitor and driving
visitation in the off-
season.

Monterey County’s TID
will generate $2.3 billion
in visitor spending over
the next decade.

Adopting the MCCVB’s
proposed assessment
would generate an
additional $2.2 billion,
greatly accelerating post-
pandemic growth.
46 Monterey Visitor Economy:

Overview and Trends2
47 7
Importance of the visitor economy
Visitors to Monterey County spent $3.2 billion in 2019. Most of this spending accrued to the accommodations and food services sectors.

This spending directly generated (i.e., not including indirect and induced effects) 27,160 jobs, $1.4 billion of income, and $298 million in state and local taxes.

Monterey County represents approximately one-third of the Central Coast region’s tourism sector and 2% of the state’s tourism sector. *Much of this report focuses on 2019 (fiscal or calendar year) as a benchmark for a typical year.

In 2019*, visitors spent $3.2 billion in Monterey County, supporting 40,480 jobs and $2.1 billion in local income** Key tourism indictors in Monterey County, 2019
Dollar figures in millions
Sources: Dean Runyan Associates, Tourism Economics
**totals include indirect and induced impacts calculated by Tourism Economics Monterey Visitor Economy:

Overview and Trends
Total visitor spending $3,241
Accommodations $879
Food Service $967
Food Stores $78
Local Tran. & Gas $267
Arts, Ent. & Rec. $394
Retail Sales $520
Visitor Air Tran. $24
Other $112
Total Earnings** $2,161
Direct earning $1,420
Total jobs** 40,480
Direct jobs 27,160
Total S&L taxes** $398
Direct S&L taxes $298
48 8
Trends in the visitor economy
Meanwhile earning and jobs increased 65% and 32%, respectively.

Visitor spending increased 43% from 2011 to 2019. Growth of the visitor economy* in Monterey Dollar figures in billions
Source Dean Runyan Associates
*earnings and jobs include direct impacts only
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 $0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
$3.5
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Thousands
Spending (left axis)
Earnings (left axis)
Jobs (right axis)
Monterey Visitor Economy:

Overview and Trends
49 9
Hotel sector KPIs
From FY2016-2019, ADR grew from $192 to $224, a 17% increase over three years
RevPAR grew to $164 from $137, a 20% increase.

Hotel occupancy increased to 73% from 71%.

Hotel performance metrics were all strengthening in the years prior to the pandemic.

Hotel sector KPIs in Monterey County
Dollars
Source Dean Runyan Associates
Monterey Visitor Economy:

Overview and Trends
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Occupancy (right axis)
ADR (left axis)
RePAR (left axis)
50 10
Visitor spending share
In 2019, Monterey County accounted for 34.7% of all spending in the Central Coast region, up from 32.5% in 2011. This increase of 2.2% may seem small; but given that visitors spent $9.4 billion dollars in the region in 2019, the 2.2% increase represents an additional $202 million in visitor spending injected into Monterey’s economy.

Monterey has been capturing an increasing share of the
region's tourism market.

Monterey share of visitor spending in the Central Coast region Share of total regional spending
Source: Dean Runyan Associates
* Includes Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura Counties

31.0%

31.5%

32.0%

32.5%

33.0%

33.5%

34.0%

34.5%

35.0%

35.5%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Monterey Visitor Economy:

Overview and Trends
51 11
Visitor spending comparisons
Monterey County outpaced three of four nearby leisure-oriented counties from 2011-2019, including Sonoma, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara.

Monterey exhibited strong growth compared to other nearby leisure-oriented counties.

Visitor spending growth in Monterey and local competitors Index (2011=100)
Source: Dean Runyan Associates
90 100
110
120
130
140
150
160
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Monterey
Sonoma
Napa
San Luis Obispo
Santa Barbara
Monterey Visitor Economy:

Overview and Trends
52 12
Tourism employment growth comparisons
Direct employment in Monterey County reached 27,160 in 2019, up from 20,510 in 2011. This represents an increase of 32% over that time period, which is slightly faster than growth in the state and region.

Direct tourism employment in Monterey has grown at an
accelerated rate.

Direct tourism employment growth in Monterey, the region, and the state Index (2011=100)
Source: Dean Runyan Associates
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Monterey
Central Coast
California
Monterey Visitor Economy:

Overview and Trends
53 13
Hotel sector growth comparisons
Hotel room revenue in Monterey outpaced 10 competing destinations and grew almost 8% faster than the state.

Monterey led its competition in terms of room revenue
growth over the three years prior to the pandemic.

Room revenue growth in Monterey and competitors, FY2017-2019* Percent total growth
Source: STR
*We use a shorter time horizon due to data limitations

17.8%

17.6%

11.8%

10.3%

10.2%

10.0%

9.4%

8.8%

8.3%

7.1%

6.6%

4.3%
0% 10% 20%
Monterey County
South Lake Tahoe
San Francisco/San Mateo
Sonoma County,
San Jose/Santa Cruz
California
San Diego
Palm Springs
Santa Barbara/Santa Maria
Newport Beach/Dana Point
Napa County
Laguna Beach
Monterey Visitor Economy:

Overview and Trends
54 14
Visitor spending comparisons
While Monterey’s strong performance is notable over the entire decade, the county achieved particularly robust growth in the later half of the decade.

Between 2015 and 2019, visitor spending in Monterey increased 20%, outpacing both the region (+17%) and the state (+19%).

Visitor spending increased at a faster rate in Monterey than in the state or region.

Visitor spending growth in Monterey, the region, and the state Index (2011=100)
Source: Dean Runyan Associates
90 100
110
120
130
140
150
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Monterey
Central Coast
California
Monterey Visitor Economy:

Overview and Trends
55 MCCVB Performance3
56 16
Advertising ROI
In the first half of FY2022, media campaigns run by the MCCVB generated awareness of Monterey County as a tourism destination in 4.2 million households in both drive and fly markets. These newly aware households made 115,261 trips to Monterey County and spent $136.8 million locally.

These ads produced an ROI of 75-to-1.

MCCVB advertising generates a significant ROI in drive and fly markets.

MCCVB advertising performance by market type, mid-year FY2022 Source: SMARI
MCCVB Performance
Drive Fly Total
Aware households created 2,500,000 1,700,000 4,200,000
Influenced trips to Monterey 45,857 69,404 115,261
Influenced visitor spending (millions) $44.0 $92.8 $136.8 Ad spending (millions) $0.7 $1.1 $1.8
ROI 62-to-1 84-to-1 75-to-1
57 17
Group sales performance
The sales teams booked 255 events in FY2019, up from 250 in FY2016.

Meanwhile, rooms booked increased to 69,000 from 61,200, a 13% increase over the same time period.

The average size of events also increased in this time period, growing to 271 rooms per event from 245.

The MCCVB’s group sales team was increasing its bookings prior to the pandemic.

MCCVB Performance
MCCVB group sales
Rooms booked
Source: MCCVB
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
250
255
260
0 10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
2016 2017 2018 2019
Rooms
Events
58 18
Group sales return on investment
The events booked by the MCCVB sales team resulted in 96,800 total room sales and $44 million in visitor spending. This provided an ROI of 14-to-1 when measured against their $3.1 million budget.

The MCCVB’s group sales team generated a substantial ROI in FY2019.

MCCVB Performance
MCCVB group sales performance, FY2019
Source: MCCVB; Tourism Economics
*This includes bookings in the event room block and an estimation of outside the block bookings from Tourism Economics’ and Destination International‘s Event Impact Calculator. ** Includes spending by the event organizer.

Total event rooms* 96,800
Spending per room** $455
Total Spending (millions) $44.0
Sales and group services expenses (millions) $3.1
Group sales ROI 14-to-1
59 19
Group sales and seasonality
While group sales* remain low in November and December, they create a substantial boost in the shoulder months of Jan.-Apr. and Sep.-Oct. when transient (i.e., not group or contract) room bookings are lower. *As reported by STR, which includes additional rooms beyond what the MCCVB books.

Group sales help fill out the off-peak “shoulder” seasons for the Monterey visitor economy.

MCCVB Performance
Seasonality of room bookings in Monterey County, 2018
Monthly share of annual rooms
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Transient rooms
Group rooms
Source: STR
60 Growing the Visitor Economy4
61 21
Overcoming supply constraints
This section reviews ways to increase the economic impact of tourism given current supply constraints
While a 73% occupancy rate may leave an impression that there are numerous available rooms, this is close to full capacity for a leisure destination. It is rare to see non-urban destinations (cities fill weekdays and ‘low’ seasons with business travelers) maintain annual occupancy rates above 75%.

Therefore, increasing the economic impact of tourism in Monterey County largely depends on some combination of increasing room inventory, increasing visitor spending per booked room, and filling out the shoulder periods (especially weekdays).

Monterey’s pre-pandemic occupancy rate was nearing full capacity.

Growing the Visitor Economy
Occupancy rate in Monterey County and competing destinations, FY2019 Source: STR
82%
78%
75%
75%
75%
73%
73%
72%
71%
70%
68%
62%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
San Francisco/San Mateo
San Diego
California
San Jose/Santa Cruz
Sonoma County
Monterey County
Newport Beach/Dana Point
Laguna Beach,
Napa Valley
Santa Barbara/Santa Maria
South Lake Tahoe
Palm Springs
62 22
Importance of visitor value
To maximize the value of each visitor, the MCCVB can concentrate on the domestic-fly and overseas markets. The domestic-fly market spends 42% more than the drive market, and the overseas* market spends 192% more than the domestic drive market.
*The overseas spending estimate is a statewide average that comes from Tourism Economics’ International State Travel database and includes data inputs from a dozen sources including the NTTO, the BEA, and VisaVue Travel. This includes spending in California, but not spending on travel to the US.

Visitors from greater distances spend significantly more per trip.

Growing the Visitor Economy
Spending per trip by origin market
Sources: SMARI; Tourism Economics Dollars per trip
*California figure – calendar year 2020, other figures FY2021 $959
$1,364
$2,799
$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000
Domestic drive
Domestic fly
Overseas*
63 23
Importance of visitor value
Compared to the domestic drive market, the domestic fly market spends 31% more per night, the business conference market spends 158% more, and the overseas* market spends 190% more.
*The overseas origin market estimate uses San Jose data, the closest available data point, and comes from Tourism Economics’ Global City Travel database. This uses data inputs from a dozen sources including the NTTO, the BEA, and VisaVue Travel.

This includes spending in San Jose, but not spending on travel to the US.

Visitors from greater distances spend significantly more per night.

Growing the Visitor Economy
Spending per night by origin market
Sources: SMARI; Tourism Economics Dollars per night
*San Jose figure – calendar year 2020, other figures FY2021 ** Includes spending by the event organizer.
$153
$201
$455
$561
$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600
Domestic drive
Domestic fly
Business conference**
Overseas*
64 24
Boosting the low season
While Monterey’s 73% annual occupancy rate is quite high for a non-urban leisure destination, MCCVB can realize the opportunity to increase low- season bookings.

If the six low-season months (average occupancy 64%) matched the occupancy rate of the six high-seasons months (80%), Monterey would see an increase of 354,000 rooms booked—a 10% increase over its current total.

MCCVB is also well-positioned to increase off-season
bookings.

Growing the Visitor Economy
Seasonality and potential new booking in Monterey, 2019 Sources: STR; Tourism Economics
*Potential new room bookings if these months could match the high-season occupancy rate of 80%.

Rooms booked Occupancy rate Potential new bookings*
Jan 214,000 56% 93,000
Feb 215,000 64% 53,000
Mar 253,000 68% 44,000
Apr 277,000 75% 18,000
May 290,000 76% --
Jun 302,000 82% --
Jul 319,000 84% --
Aug 317,000 83% --
Sep 291,000 79% --
Oct 295,000 77% --
Nov 248,000 67% 49,000
Dec 210,000 55% 97,000
Total 3,231,000 354,000
65 Competitive Funding Analysis5
66 26
TID overview
Full-service hotels are assessed $2.00 and other hotels are assessed $1.00. In FY2019, the TID (tourism improvement district) generated $4.2 million of funding dedicated for tourism promotion through the MCCVB and represented the largest source of funding for tourism promotion in the county.

The Monterey County TID assessment that funds the MCCVB ranges from $1.00 to $2.00.

Competitive Funding Analysis
Monterey hotel sector and TID details by scale, FY2019
Source: MCCVB, STR
ADR Room revenue % of Revenue
Current Avg TID per
Room Assumption
Current TID
Contribution
Contribution % of
Total TID
Luxury $455 $294,000,000 41% $2.00 $1,293,000 31%
Upper Upscale $229 $134,000,000 19% $1.50 $875,000 21%
Upscale $180 $48,000,000 7% $1.25 $333,000 8%
Upper Midscale $185 $75,000,000 10% $1.15 $468,000 11%
Midscale $179 $39,000,000 5% $1.00 $218,000 5%
Economy $132 $133,000,000 18% $1.00 $1,013,000 24%
Total $231 $724,000,000 100% $0.00 $4,201,000 100%
67 27
TID rate comparison
This set includes the MCCVB’s competitive set and additional DMOs that disclosed their assessment rate to Destinations International (DI).

Since the assessment is a major source of revenue for the MCCVB (and the majority of other DMOs on this list), this results in a limited tourism promotion budget for Monterey County. Increasing the TID assessment rate could generate additional funding and provide competitive funding for tourism promotion in Monterey County.
*Monterey’s per room assessment scheme results in an overall rate of 0.6% of room revenue.

Monterey’s TID assessment of 0.6%* is much lower than the competitive set average of 2.1%.

Competitive Funding Analysis
TID assessment rates in Monterey and competitors
TID assessment rate
Sources: Dean Runyan Associates; Tourism Economics

4.0%

3.0%

2.9%

2.3%

2.1%

2.0%

1.5%

1.0%

0.6%
0% 2% 4% 6%
Stockton
Huntington Beach
Newport Beach
Palm Springs
Pasadena
San Francisco
Average
Anaheim
Portland
Sonoma County
Napa Valley
San Diego
Orange County
Los Angeles
San Luis Obispo
Mendocino County
Monterey County
68 28
Napa County, CA
Monterey
County, CASanta Barbara, CA
Sonoma
County, CA
Stockton, CA
Ventura,
CA San Luis
Obispo, CA***
Huntington
Beach, CA
Palm Springs,
CA
Lake Tahoe, CA
Newport,
CA
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Thousands
Competitive funding analysis
This analysis compares destinations’ DMO budgets relative to the size of the local tourism sector (as measured by hotel room inventory). This analysis shows that Monterey County tourism promotion is underfunded compared to the line of best fit (the dotted line).

We chose to conduct a pre-pandemic analysis to provide perspective on a ‘normal’ level of DMO spending and room inventory, as the pandemic has caused severe swings.

Tourism promotion in Monterey County is underfunded
relative to local competitors.

Competitive Funding Analysis
Hotel, rooms (000’s)
Sources: Tourism Economics, DI, STR
*2018 or 2019 depending on destination’s reporting
** San Luis Obispo has greatly increased their DMO’s budget recently. The destination will likely spend close to $10m in 2022, up from $4.6m in this analysis.

Hotel rooms and DMO revenue in competing destinations, pre-pandemic* DMO budget, millions
Competitive
funding line
69 29
Competitive funding analysis
Examining the same data as the prior slide, we see that Monterey County provides $630 of tourism promotion spending for every hotel room, 38% below the set average.

Monterey County’s tourism promotion budget is 38% below the set average.

Competitive Funding Analysis
Funding dollars per hotel room
Sources: Tourism Economics, DI, STR
*2018 or 2019 depending on destination’s reporting
** San Luis Obispo has recently increased their DMO’s budget, and their figure may double in 2022.

Tourism promotion funding per room in select destinations, pre-pandemic $2,000
$1,536
$1,328
$1,310
$1,031
$1,012
$865
$687
$634
$630
$624
$484
$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000
Huntington Beach, CA
Napa County, CA
Palm Springs, CA
Sonoma County, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
Average
Newport, CA
Lake Tahoe, CA
Ventura, CA
Monterey County, CA
Stockton, CA
San Luis Obispo, CA**
70 Impact of TID Funding on the
Monterey Economy6
71 31
Importance of visitor value
Increasing or decreasing the TID assessment rate would do little to change Monterey’s price competitiveness amongst its main competitors. Economically, elimination of the TID is unlikely to produce any positive benefit on room demand. Tourism Economics modeling on behalf of STR has consistently found hotel room demand to be highly inelastic at the market level. That is, while an individual property may gain or lose share within a market based on price, a market-wide shift in rate has no appreciable impact on room demand.

The impact of the loss of tourism promotion funding would in all likelihood far exceed any possible negative effect of higher room costs. We also note that from FY2016-2019, ADR increased 17% while the occupancy rate grew to 73% from 71%. This indicates that price sensitivity does not seem to be a major factor for visitors.

In sum, eliminating the TID would not impact hotels’ price competitiveness but would appreciably undercut Monterey’s competitive market position in the absence of concerted destination sales and marketing.

Changing the TID assessment rate would not impact local hotels’ price competitiveness.

Impact of TID Funding on the Monterey Economy
Dollars
Source: STR
* The US Open boosted room rates in Monterey County FY2019.

Average room rate in Monterey and competitors, FY2019*
$353
$333
$251
$226
$224
$200
$199
$181
$172
$171
$169
$131
$0 $100 $200 $300 $400
Laguna Beach
Napa County
San Francisco/San Mateo
Newport Beach/Dana Point
Monterey County
Santa Barbara/S anta Maria
San Jose/Santa Cruz
Sonoma County,
Palm Springs
California
San Diego
South Lake Tahoe
72 32
Importance of visitor value
Based on prior calculations of paid media and group sales ROIs, we estimate that the MCCVB has an organizational ROI of 47-to-1 (i.e., one dollar of MCCVB funding generates $47 of visitor spending).

The MCCVB generated an ROI of $47-to-$1.

Sources: SMARI; MCCVB; Tourism Economics
MCCVB organizational ROI calculations
Impact of TID Funding on the Monterey Economy
Value Source / calculation
Paid media ROI on visitor spending 75-to-1 See 'MCCVB Performance' section Paid Media expenses share of total DMO budget 56% MCCVB Group Sales ROI on visitor spending 14-to-1 See 'MCCVB Performance' section Group sales share of total DMO budget 33% MCCVB
Organization ROI on visitor spending 47-to-1 (75 * 61%) + (14 * 33%) 73 33
Scenario development
Here we evaluate the impact of changes to the TID structure via three scenarios. In the Baseline Scenario the TID structure remains the same, in the TID elimination scenario the TID is removed, and in the Alternative TID Scenario the TID structure is changed to a three-tiered flat assessment that begins at $1.50 for limited-service hotels, $4.50 for full-service hotels, and $7.00 for luxury properties with biennial escalators.

We provide additional details on the three scenarios in fiscal year 2025, as this is the first year without a “cool-down” or “ramp-up” effect (i.e. the full effect of a funding increase/decrease will not be felt in the first two years of budget changes as lags exists between assessments being collected, distributed, media spending being increased/decreased, consumers making travel plans, and visitors actually traveling).

In 2025, our Baseline Scenario forecasted MCCVB’s revenue is $9.0 million.

In the TID Elimination Scenario, the MCCVB receives $4.0 million, a decrease of $5.0 million. We estimate a 47-to-1 ROI on this lost funding spending, which results in $233 million of lost visitor spending.

Changes in the TID could create an impact of several hundred million dollars.

Impact of TID Funding on the Monterey Economy
MCCVB revenue and visitor spending in three scenarios, FY2025 Dollar figures in millions
TID Elimination
Scenario
Baseline
Scenario
Alternative
Assessment Scenario
TID revenue $0.0 $5.0 $9.8
Jurisdiction investment $4.0 $4.0 $4.0
Total MCCVB revenue $4.0 $9.0 $13.8
Revenue change relative to baseline -$5.0 -- $4.8
Anticipated ROI revenue change* 47-to-1 -- 42-to-1
Change in visitor spending -$233 -- $204
Total visitor spending $3,157 $3,391 $3,594
Sources: SMARI; MCCVB; Tourism Economics
In the Alternative Assessment Scenario, the MCCVB receives $13.8 million in revenue, an increase of $4.8 million. To be conservative and account for diminishing marginal returns on new funding, we estimate a 42-to-1 ROI on this new funding, which results in $204 million of gained visitor spending. 74 34
'19-'32
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Growth Spending $3,189 $2,529 $2,197 $2,751 $3,295 $3,342 $3,391 $3,440 $3,525 $3,576 $3,627 $3,680 $3,733 $3,787 17% Earnings $1,387 $1,239 $991 $1,179 $1,405 $1,418 $1,431 $1,445 $1,473 $1,487 $1,501 $1,515 $1,529 $1,543 10% Jobs 26,895 23,765 19,342 24,226 28,431 28,265 28,100 27,936 28,053 27,890 27,727 27,565 27,404 27,244 2% Local taxes $168 $130 $114 $143 $172 $175 $178 $182 $186 $190 $193 $196 $200 $204 19% Sales tax $72 $58 $50 $63 $75 $76 $77 $78 $80 $81 $82 $83 $83 $84 15% TOT $71 $53 $47 $60 $72 $74 $76 $78 $80 $82 $84 $86 $88 $90 23% State taxes $142 $109 $96 $115 $143 $147 $153 $156 $159 $162 $164 $166 $169 $171 19% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Spending 100 79 69 86 103 105 106 108 111 112 114 115 117 119 Earnings 100 89 71 85 101 102 103 104 106 107 108 109 110 111 Jobs 100 88 72 90 106 105 104 104 104 104 103 102 102 101 Local taxes 100 78 68 85 103 105 106 108 111 113 115 117 119 121 Sales tax 100 81 70 87 104 105 106 108 110 111 113 114 115 117 TOT 100 75 66 84 101 104 106 109 112 115 117 120 123 126 State taxes 100 77 68 81 101 104 108 110 113 114 116 118 119 121 Baseline Scenario forecast
In our Baseline Scenario, visitor spending grows to $3.8 billion in FY2032**.

Impact of TID Funding on the Monterey Economy
Monterey County’s visitor economy, Baseline Scenario*
Dollar figures in millions
Sources: SMARI; MCCVB; Tourism Economics
*Fiscal years
**Based on MCCVB projections of hotel revenue
Monterey County’s visitor economy, Baseline Scenario
Index, (FY2019=100)
75 35
TID Elimination scenario
The TID Elimination scenario results in $2.3 billion dollars of lost spending over the next decade.

Impact of TID Funding on the Monterey Economy
Monterey County’s visitor economy, TID Elimination Scenario Dollar figures in millions
Source: Tourism Economics
*annual average
These spending losses result in losses of $939 million in earnings, $120 million in local taxes, and an average of 1,759 jobs annually. 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total losses Baseline Scenario visitor spending $3,189 $2,529 $2,197 $2,751 $3,295 $3,342 $3,391 $3,440 $3,525 $3,576 $3,627 $3,680 $3,733 $3,787 -- Lost TID Scenario visitor spending -- -- -- -- $3,221 $3,192 $3,157 $3,201 $3,280 $3,325 $3,370 $3,416 $3,463 $3,510 -- Lost spending -- -- -- -- $73 $150 $233 $239 $245 $251 $257 $263 $270 $277 $2,259 Lost earnings -- -- -- -- $31 $64 $98 $100 $102 $104 $106 $108 $111 $113 $939 Lost jobs* -- -- -- -- 633 1,270 1,933 1,941 1,949 1,957 1,966 1,974 1,982 1,990 1,759 Lost local taxes -- -- -- -- $3.8 $7.9 $12.3 $12.6 $12.9 $13.3 $13.7 $14.1 $14.5 $14.9 $120 Sales tax -- -- -- -- $1.7 $3.5 $5.4 $5.5 $5.6 $5.8 $5.9 $6.0 $6.2 $6.3 $52 TOT -- -- -- -- $1.6 $3.2 $5.1 $5.3 $5.4 $5.6 $5.8 $6.0 $6.2 $6.4 $51 Lost state taxes -- -- -- -- $3.2 $6.6 $10.6 $10.8 $11.1 $11.4 $11.6 $11.9 $12.2 $12.5 $102 76 36
TID Elimination scenario
The TID elimination scenario results in $2.3 billion dollars of lost spending over the next decade.

Impact of TID Funding on the Monterey Economy
Future visitor spending growth in Monterey, two scenarios Dollars, billions
Source: Tourism Economics
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
$3.5
$4.0
$4.5Thousands
Lost
Repeat
Baseline
TID Elimination
$2.3bn lost
over 10 years
77 37
Alternative Assessment Scenario
The Alternative Assessment Scenario results in $2.2 billion dollars of gained spending over the next decade.

Impact of TID Funding on the Monterey Economy
Monterey County’s visitor economy, Alternative Assessment Scenario Dollar figures in millions
These spending gains result in gains of $920 million in earnings, $118 million in local taxes, and an average of 1,716 jobs annually. 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total gains Baseline Scenario visitor spending $3,189 $2,529 $2,197 $2,751 $3,295 $3,342 $3,391 $3,440 $3,525 $3,576 $3,627 $3,680 $3,733 $3,787 -- Alternative Assessment Scenario visitor spending -- -- -- -- $3,349 $3,448 $3,594 $3,638 $3,766 $3,812 $3,906 $3,953 $4,048 $4,096 -- Gained spending -- -- -- -- $55 $106 $204 $199 $242 $236 $279 $273 $316 $310 $2,218 Gained earnings -- -- -- -- $23 $45 $86 $83 $101 $98 $115 $112 $129 $126 $920 Gained jobs* -- -- -- -- 471 896 1,688 1,613 1,923 1,842 2,132 2,047 2,317 2,228 1,716 Gained local taxes -- -- -- -- $2.9 $5.6 $10.7 $10.5 $12.8 $12.5 $14.8 $14.6 $16.9 $16.7 $118 Sales tax -- -- -- -- $1.7 $3.5 $5.4 $5.5 $5.6 $5.8 $5.9 $6.0 $6.2 $6.3 $52 TOT -- -- -- -- $1.6 $3.2 $5.1 $5.3 $5.4 $5.6 $5.8 $6.0 $6.2 $6.4 $51 Gained state taxes -- -- -- -- $2.4 $4.7 $9.2 $9.0 $10.9 $10.7 $12.6 $12.4 $14.3 $14.0 $100 Source: Tourism Economics
*annual average
78 38
Alternative Assessment Scenario
The Alternative Assessment Scenario results in $2.2 billion dollars of gained spending over the next decade.

Impact of TID Funding on the Monterey Economy
Future visitor spending growth in Monterey, two scenarios Dollars, billions
Source: Tourism Economics
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
$3.5
$4.0
$4.5
$5.0Thousands
Lost
Repeat
Baseline
Alternative Assessment
$2.2bn gained
over 10 years
79 39
Scenario comparison
The changes in TID funding create a notable impact on the future path of the visitor economy.

Impact of TID Funding on the Monterey Economy
Future visitor spending growth in Monterey, three scenarios Dollars, billions
Source: Tourism Economics
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
$3.0
$3.5
$4.0
$4.5Thousands
Alternative Assessment
Baseline
TID Elimination
80 Appendix: The National Impact of
Tourism Improvement Districts
81 41
National study of TID benefits
The study finds that tourism improvement districts (TIDs) provide a competitive advantage for destinations. By examining TID impacts on room demand, revenue, and visitor spending, this white paper explores that ground-breaking research and explains how TIDs enhance economic impacts in destinations.

The following pages review a collaborative research project on the impact of TIDs performed by Tourism Economics.

The Impact of Tourism Improvement Districts
82 42
Destination sample
The analysis covers 100 cities, including 29
TID destinations and 71 non-TID
destinations.

The Impact of TIDs
Cities included in Tourism Economics’ TID impact analysis 83 43
Room demand regression model
Our approach to estimate the effect of TID on room demand included:

1. 100 US destinations (counties); 29 TID destinations and 71 non-TID destinations

2. Oxford Economics databank was utilized for relevant macroeconomic indicators, namely, GDP and employment (at county level)

3. The final panel dataset consisted of 100 cross-sections and 30 time periods (1990-2019), totaling 3,000 observations
The Impact of TIDs
log 𝑅𝑜𝑜𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑 = 𝑏1 + 𝑏2 × log 𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑠&𝑅𝑒𝑐 𝐺𝐷𝑃
+𝑏3 × log 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐺𝐷𝑃 + 𝑏4 × 𝑇𝐼𝐷𝑑𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑦 + 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟
Where 𝑇𝐼𝐷𝑑𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑦 = 1 for a TID city, and 0 otherwise.
• The model sought to test whether a positive and significant relationship existed between the dependent variable, 𝑅𝑜𝑜𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑, and the independent variable 𝑇𝐼𝐷𝑑𝑢𝑚𝑚𝑦 ; a positive 𝑏4 coefficient with a small p-value. • The other two independent variables, Arts & Rec 𝐺𝐷𝑃 and 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐺𝐷𝑃, were employed as control variables to control for a destination’s size and its relative importance as a tourist destination.
• Below are the regression results indicating a positive and highly significant 𝑏4 coefficient.
• The results suggest that when controlled for size and importance of a destination as a tourist destination, across our sample of 100 cities, there was an average

2.12% difference in room demand between years in which a destination had an active TID and years without a TID. Results are statistically significant with a 99% confidence level.
84 44
High-level view
Visually, we can observe that TID destinations outperformed non-TID markets in the latest upcycle.

The Impact of TIDs
Total hotel room revenue
TID vs. non-TID cities growth
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Total hotel room revenue
TID vs. Non-TID cities growth
Source: STR, Civitas, Tourism Economics
TID cities
Non -TID cities
Total hotel room revenue
TID vs. non-TID cities (2002=100)
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
220%
240%
260%
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Total hotel room revenue
TID vs. Non-TID cities (2002=100)
Source: STR, Civitas, Tourism Economics
TID cities
Non -TID cities
85 45
TID growth premium: demand
The Impact of TIDs
Room demand growth premium*
2003-2019
-0.12%

0.34%
-0.20%
-0.10%

0.00%

0.10%

0.20%

0.30%

0.40%
Before TID After TID
The demand premium is calculated as the difference between an average 3-year growth in TID cities and non-TID cities prior to the TID (“Before TID”) and post the TID (“After TID”).
• Before authorizing a TID, growth in cities that eventually had a TID was 12 basis points slower compared to growth in TID cities. • After authorizing a TID, growth in TID cities was 34 basis points faster compared to non-TID cities.
• Swing of 0.5% in room demand.

On average, a destination gains 0.5% in demand growth per year after a TID is put in place.
“Premium” is measured as the difference in growth rates between TID and non-TID destinations Source: STR, Tourism Economics
86 46
TID growth premium: revenue
The Impact of TIDs
Room revenue growth premium*
2003-2019
The revenue premium is calculated as the difference between an average 3-year growth in TID cities and non-TID cities prior to the TID (“Before TID”) and post the TID (“After TID”).
• Before authorizing a TID, growth in TID cities was 24 basis points faster compared to growth in non-TID cities
• After authorizing a TID, growth in TID cities was 130 basis points faster compared to non-TID cities
• Gain of 1.1% in room revenue.

On average, a destination gains 1.1% in revenue growth per year after a TID is put in place.
“Premium” is measured as the difference in growth rates between TID and non-TID destinations Source: STR, Tourism Economics

0.24%

1.30%

0.00%

0.20%

0.40%

0.60%

0.80%

1.00%

1.20%

1.40%
Before TID After TID
87 47
TID room demand lift
The Impact of TIDs
Average annual hotel room demand
TID cities
The 29 TID destinations in our model grew to generate 7,027,654 rooms in 2019. Without the boost generated by the TIDs, these destinations would have only generated 6,878,260 rooms.

On average, our modeling indicates that TIDs produce a 2.1% lift in hotel room demand.

Sources: STR, Civitas, Tourism Economics
6,878,260
7,027,654
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
5,000,000
5,500,000
6,000,000
6,500,000
7,000,000
7,500,000
Average annual hotel room demand
TID cities
Source: STR, Civitas, Tourism Economics
Actual room
demand
Estimated room
demand in
absence of TID
88 48
TID room demand lift
The Impact of TIDs
Average annual hotel room demand
TID cities (millions)
The 29 TID destinations in our model grew to generate $1.12 billion in room revenue in 2019. Without the boost generated by the TIDs, these destinations would have only generated $1.07 billion in room revenue.

On average, our modeling indicates that TIDs produce a 4.5% lift in hotel room revenue.

Sources: STR, Civitas, Tourism Economics
$1,067
$1,118
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
$1,100
$1,200
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 Average annual hotel room revenue
TID cities (millions)
Actual room revenue
Estimated room
revenue in
absence of TID
89 49
Economic benefits of TIDs
Tourism promotion funding provided by TIDs results in more visitors and visitor spending, and this spending represents a new injection to the local economy with many downstream benefits . In total, benefits are felt on three levels.
• Direct Impacts: Visitors create direct economic value within a discreet group of sectors (e.g., recreation, transportation). This supports a relative proportion of jobs, wages, taxes, and GDP within each sector. • Indirect Impacts: Each directly affected sector also purchases goods and services as inputs (e.g., food wholesalers, utilities) into production.

These impacts are called indirect impacts.
• Induced Impacts: Lastly, the induced impact is generated when employees whose wages are generated whether directly or indirectly by visitors, spend those wages in the local economy.

The impacts of TIDs go beyond just the hotel and tourism sector.

The Impact of Tourism Improvement Districts
RETAIL

ENTERTAINMENT/REC

FOOD & BEVERAGE

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION

LODGING

AIR TRANSPORTATION
SALES
GDP
JOBS
INCOME
TAXES
90 Appendix 2: The ROI of Destination Marketing
91 51
The ROI of Destination Marketing
Many state and local CVBs and DMOs conduct periodic assessments of marketing effectiveness. There are several goals of these studies, including understanding how specific marketing campaigns are perceived by households, how effective the campaigns are in having an impact on households’ intent to travel to a given destination, and which target markets are showing differing level of responsiveness to marketing.

Frequently these studies include a specific analysis of the ROI of marketing spending in the form of a quantitative assessment of the level of incremental visitor spending and tax revenues that are attributable to destination marketing.

These studies use a variety of methods and are measuring the impact of a range of different campaigns across different situations. For example, a specific study may look at incremental visitors attracted by a state-level marketing campaign conducted by a state that attracts travelers from a range of national markets, while another study may focus on the results of a more targeted regional campaign carried out by a city-level CVB. While the results of a specific study pertain most directly to the situation that was analyzed and the corresponding assumptions, it is appropriate to consider broader inferences from the research. We analyzed recent studies that included an estimate of the incremental visitor spending attributable to advertising campaign spending.

For example, in a fairly typical approach, a study would:
• Use a survey to analyze the effect of a specific advertising campaign on households’ travel to a given destination, such as by analyzing the impact on actual travel among those that had observed the advertising or by analyzing the impact on households’ intentions to travel; • Project that effect to the broader set of households in the marketing area to estimate the number of incremental visits attributable to the campaign;
• Apply typical levels of spending per visitor to estimate incremental visitor spending; and,
• Compare incremental visitor spending to the level of advertising spending to estimate the ROI.

Tourism Economics summarized the estimates of incremental visitor spending per dollar of advertising campaign spending from these studies in the table on the following page
92 52
The ROI of Destination Marketing
Estimates of incremental visitor spending per dollar of advertising campaign spending from the set of studies we analyzed is summarized in the adjacent table, supporting the following observations:

Overall, we observe that recent marketing campaigns by destination marketing organizations at the metro/regional level have generated approximately $53 of incremental visitor spending per dollar of advertising spending.

These ROI estimates relate directly to advertising spending. It is also appropriate to consider a visitor spending ROI relative to total CVB operating costs, or relative to public funding. As an example of the former approach, Meet Minneapolis reports the ratio of visitor spending associated with events tracked in its group sales management system to total CVB operating costs has averaged $33 in recent years. This excludes almost all leisure visitor spending.

As an example of an ROI based on public funding, the Florida state government recently analyzed the return on investment for public funding of Visit Florida.

The analysis attributed Visit Florida’s public funding (excluding, for example, significant private funding for cooperative advertising and promotions) to generating $11.2 billion of visitor spending during the three-year-period through FY 2013, representing a visitor spending ROI of $97, and a state tax revenue ROI of $3.2 ($3.20 of state tax revenue generated by each $1 of state funding).

Marketing ROI matrix
Sources: Local studies compiled by Tourism Economics
93 53
For more information:
[email protected]
Tourism Economics is an Oxford Economics company with a singular objective: combine an understanding of the travel sector with proven economic tools to answer the most important questions facing our clients. More than 500 companies, associations, and destination work with Tourism Economics every year as a research partner. We bring decades of experience to every engagement to help our clients make better marketing, investment, and policy decisions. Our team of highly-specialized economists deliver:
• Global travel data-sets with the broadest set of country, city, and state coverage available • Travel forecasts that are directly linked to the economic and demographic outlook for origins and destinations • Economic impact analysis that highlights the value of visitors, events, developments, and industry segments • Policy analysis that informs critical funding, taxation, and travel facilitation decisions • Market assessments that define market allocation and investment decisions Tourism Economics operates out of regional headquarters in Philadelphia and Oxford, with offices in Belfast, Dubai, Frankfurt, and Ontario.

Oxford Economics is one of the world’s foremost independent global advisory firms, providing reports, forecasts and analytical tools on 200 countries, 100 industrial sectors and over 3,000 cities. Our best-of-class global economic and industry models and analytical tools give us an unparalleled ability to forecast external market trends and assess their economic, social and business impact. Headquartered in Oxford, England, with regionalcenters in London, New York, and Singapore, Oxford Economics has offices across the globe in Belfast, Chicago, Dubai, Miami, Milan, Paris, Philadelphia, San Francisco, and Washington DC, we employ over 400 full-time staff, including 300 professional economists, industry experts and business editors—one of the largest teams of macroeconomists and thought leadership specialists.

About Tourism Economics
94 January 11, 2023 Item No. 10f(5)
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Marina City Council of January 18, 2023
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 202 3-,

APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST II POSITION AT THE MARINA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE CITY’S

CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN, AND, AUTHORIZING

THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY BUDGETARY AND

ACCOUNTING ENTRIES
REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 2023-, approving the allocation of an Administrative Analyst II position at the Marina Municipal Airport; and,

2. Authorizing the City Manager to make necessary adjustments to the City’s classification and compensation plan, and,

3. Authorizing the Finance Director to make necessary budgetary and accounting entries.

BACKGROUND:

The Marina Municipal Airport currently is staffed by one full time Airport Services Manager and one full time maintenance worker. The Airport Services Manager is tasked with daily safety checks, pilot services and communications, fuel delivery, tenant relations, lease management, facility maintenance and repair coordination, billings, invoicing, Airport Capital Improvement Project coordination, airport planning, FAA coordination, grant applications and reporting, and daily customer service needs. The Airport is in a unique position to grow and succeed with introduct ion of major new tenants and opportunities for significant grant funding from the FAA.

ANALYSIS:

The day-to-day service demands at the Marina Municipal Airport have grown considerably in the last few years with the introduction of new major tenants. For the Airport to operate successfully and to pursue growth opportunities through grant funding and employer expansion , support staff is needed to augment the day-to-day administrative duties that must be undertaken. It is staff’s assessment that the proper Classification to perform the needed support duties for the Airport Services Manager is Administrative Assistant II.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The annual salary and benefits costs for the Administrative Assistant II position is approximately $90,000 annually. The Airport operates an enterprise fund which has adequate ongoing funding for the Administrative Assistant II position. This position will not have an impact on the General Fund. 1 CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and action.

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Matt Mogensen
Assistant City Manager

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

__________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. - 2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA APPROVING THE

ALLOCATION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST II POSITION AT THE MARINA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN, AND,

AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY BUDGETARY AND

ACCOUNTING ENTRIES

WHEREAS, there is a need for a n Administrative Analyst II position to provide support staff at the Marina Municipal Airport; and,

WHEREAS, the Administrative Analyst II at the Airport position will be part the Marina Employees Association group; and,

WHEREAS, the salary and benefits for the proposed position is approximately $90,000 annually; and,

WHEREAS, the Airport operates an enterprise fund which has adequate ongoing funding for the Administrative Assistant II position. This position will not have an impact on the General Fund.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina as follows:

1. That the Administrative Analyst II classification is position is hereby added to the Marina Municipal Airport staff allocation plan.

2. That the Administrative Analyst II will be part of the Marina Employees Association group.

3. That the salary schedule of the Administrative Analyst is previously included in the Citywide compensation plan.

4. That the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to make the necessary adjustments to the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan.

5. That the C ity’s Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to make the necessary and appropriate budget adjustments.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the C ity of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 18th day of January 2023 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

______________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

3 January 13, 2023 Item No. 10f(6)
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of the Marina City Council of January 18, 2023
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 202 3-,

APPROVING A FINANCIAL ANALYST CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY SCHEDULE; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE
NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE CITY’S CLASSIFICATION AND
COMPENSATION PLAN; AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY BUDGETARY AND ACCOUNTING ENTRIES.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 2023-, approving a Financial Analyst classification and salary schedule; and

2. Authorizing the City Manager to make necessary adjustments to the City’s classification and compensation plan; and

3. Authorizing the Finance Director to make necessary budgetary and accounting entries.

BACKGROUND:

Currently the City has budgeted a Finance Director, Assistant Finance Director/Accounting Manager, Payroll Technician and two Accounting Technician positions for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. Additionally, the City has had a long-term contract with a certified public accountant (CPA) to provide accounting services on a part-time basis (equivalent to a half-time FTE).

The Financial Analyst position will perform complex technical and general professional accounting and analytical functions in the maintenance of the City’s accounting system. These functions include:
- Assists in the accurate and proper maintenance of the City’s double -entry general accounting system including all sub -systems which may include payroll, accounts receivable , accounts payable, etc.
- Perform reconciliations of journals, ledgers and other accounting records. - Prepare required reports for Local, State and Federal agencies. - Assists in the preparation, administration and monitoring of the City budget, including Capital Improvement Programs.

ANALYSIS:

To help meet the workload and compl exity of finance and accounting work in our city , staff is proposing to reduce some of the hours o f the CPA and apply these hours to help fund a full-time Financial Analyst position. Typically, cities the size of Marina will have Analyst(s) or Accountant(s) in addition to a Director, Assistant Director or Manager , and Technicians. Our neighboring cities of Seaside, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas all have similar positions in their finance departments. The size of the finance department has not changed in over 10 years while the Agency ’s financial and operating structure has increased in complexity due to additional compliance requirements arising from new tax measure s (Measures N, U and X) , the dissolution of the Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA), progressively complex developer agreements , redevelopment agency ove rsight, various revenue and tax increment bonds and a greatly expanded Capital Improvement Program. 1 In addition to the creation of the new classification of Financial Analyst, a new salary range must be established. This position wo uld be confidential, unrepresented, and exempt from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The proposed salary range is based on a current salary survey of similar positions in neighboring cities and is also based on the similar complexity to our existing Human Resource Analyst position.

Financial Analyst Classification Salary Range

Classification Monthly Salary Range
Financial Analyst $6,731 - $8,181

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed Financial Analyst salary and benefits will cost approximately $ 120,000 annually. The finance department recently made changes in the allocation of personnel costs to non-general fund departments. As a result, the department has experienced personnel cost savings. Additiona lly, the new Financial Analyst position will reduce the need for contract accounting services. The new position’s on-going cost to the general fund will be approximately $ 45,000. This position can be funded from existing salary savings in our current Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budget. On-going, the General Fund has the ability to fund this position without reducing service levels or impacting other positions.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and action.

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Juan Lopez
Finance Director

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

______________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF M ARINA APPROVING A

FINANCIAL ANALYST CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY SCHEDULE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO CITY’S CLASSIFICATION

AND COMPENSATION PLAN, AND AUTHORIZING FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE

APPROPRIATE BUDGETARY AND ACCOUNTING ENTRIES

WHEREAS, there is a need for a Financial Analyst position, and:

WHEREAS, the Financial Analyst position will be confidential and unrepresented, and:

WHEREAS, the proposed salary is as follows in the table below.

Classification Monthly Financial Analyst Salary Range
Financial Analyst $6,731 - $8,181

WHEREAS, there is sufficient funding in the current fiscal year 2022/2023 budget from salary savings, and there is sufficient on-going funding available from the General Fund in future years.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina as follows:

1. That the Financial Analyst classification is hereby approved, and;

2. That the Financial Analyst will confidential, unrepresented, and exempt from overtime and;

3. That the salary schedule of the Financial Analyst is hereby approved, and;

4. That the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to make the necessary adjustments to the City’s Classification and Compensation Plan

5. That th e C ity’s Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to make the necessary and appropriate budget adjustments.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 18th day of January 2023 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

______________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

3 Financial Analyst
Class Code:

CITY OF MARINA
Established Date: Jan 18, 2023
Revision Date: N/A

SALARY RANGE
$38.83 - $47.20 Hourly
$6,730.55 - $8,181.04 Monthly
DESCRIPTION:

Under general direction of the Finance Director or their designee, this position performs professional accounting work, including recording and reporting of financial transactions and preparation of financial reports; plans, organizes, coordinates, and performs a variety of highly responsible and complex analytical, statistical, financial, and administrative duties related to the City’s budget; and provides budgetary control for assigned funds and City departments.

This position also provides support in various functional areas of the Department of Finance, including payroll, accounts payable, accounts receivable contract administration, grant administration, regulatory compliance, and/or program management.

SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED
Receive administrative direction from the Finance Director or their designee.

EXAMPLES OF DUTIES:

The following duties are typical for this classification. Incumbents may not perform all of the listed duties and/or may be required to perform additional or different duties from those set forth below to address business needs and changing business practices.

Duties may include, but are not limited to the following:
• Assists in the accurate and proper maintenance of the City’s double- entry accounting system including all sub -systems which may include payroll, accounts receivable, accounts payable, etc.
• Participate in the implementation of accounting procedures and methods, and analyzes existing procedures and prepares recommendations for revisions when necessary. • Assists with the preparation and completion of periodic balancing and reconciliation of the general ledger and subsidiary accounts; provides departmental monthly reports for project accounting and cash balances
• Assists with the preparation, creation, and submission of daily financial transactions, monitors journals
4 • Participates in preparation of the City’s annual financial statements and annual federal, state, and local reports; prepares working trial balances, working papers, and other audit schedules and documents
• Conducts a variety of complex professional level administrative, operational, financial, and analytical duties in support of the preparation of highly complex reports, studies, research and analysis of accounts, statistics, and legal requirements • Provides assistance in resolving operational and administrative challenges to identify issues, identify solutions, develop recommendations and assist in implementations • Performs internal audits of operations and communicates results in oral or written format • May be assigned to participate in the collective bargaining process, as staff support and performs all duties required by the process including, but not limited to costing, assisting in recommendations for changes to contract language and other related duties • Coordinates with respective city departments the processing of grant expenditures and requests for reimbursements or fund draw downs.
• Interprets rules, regulations, laws, MOU’s and policies in making recommendations to management personnel.
• Analyzes accounting and financial records and prepares written and oral reports as may be needed in a clear and understandable manner
• Assists in the preparation of the annual budget including, but not limited to: revenue and expenditure forecasting and research; Capital Improvement Plan project and equipment justifications and ranking; and costing of authorized positions • Participates in the selection, training, development, and evaluation of department support staff; may act as the supervisor in his/her absence • Oversees the collection and proper accounting of City revenue; may occasionally provide coverage for the front counter collection functions to ensure good public relations are maintained
• Oversees the investment of idle cash and transfer of funds as needed to meet cash flow requirements
• In conjunction with the appropriate departments and outside agencies, develop, implement and monitor activities to provide technical accounting and services • Provides assistance in the administration and monitoring status of adopted budget (Revenues and Expenditures), including the Capital Improvement Program. • Researches projects and surveys for administrative and operational needs: budgeting, labor negotiations, procedures and policies

QUALIFICATIONS:

Education and Experience
The following generally describes the knowledge and ability required to enter the job and/or be learned within a short period of time in order to successfully perform the assigned duties.

Knowledge of:
• Accounting and Auditing Principles
• Governmental Accounting and financial analysis
• Advanced principles of financial administration, including budgeting, reporting, taxation, and revenue
• Pertinent laws and regulations governing fiscal recordkeeping and government organizations
5 • Organization and operation of municipal government
• Grant accounting and reporting
• City’s Financial and Human Resources Management ERP System or a comparable system
• Research techniques and report writing
• Policy administration
• Staff supervision, lead training, and performance evaluation • Modern office practices, procedures, and administration • Customer service best practices

Ability to:
• Utilize accounting software and standard office software including spreadsheets, word processing, and electronic mail
• Examine and verify financial documents and reports
• Prepare complex financial statements, reports, and analyses • Communicate effectively both verbally and in writing
• Establish and maintain effective working relationships

Skills to:
• Exercise individual and innovative judgment and make difficult decisions. • Exhibit discretion and integrity when handling sensitive situations.

Any combination of experience and education that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be:
• Education: Equivalent to Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university in accounting, finance, or closely related field;
• Experience: Three (3) years of increasingly responsible, professional accounting or analytical experience in public finance.

Examples of another equivalent combinations include:
• Associate degree from an accredited college or university with major coursework in accounting, business administration or related field with six (6) years of increasingly responsible experience in accounting, bookkeeping or financial analysis.

License and Certification:
• Possession of or ability to obtain a California driver’s license.

TOOLS USED, ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS & PHYSICAL
DEMANDS:

EQUIPMENT USED
Requires frequent use of personal computer, including word processing, database and spreadsheet programs, telephone, copy and fax machines, and all tools and equipment necessary to successfully perform the essential and important duties of the position.

PHYSICAL DEMANDS
6 The physical demands described here are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Work is performed mostly in an office setting. Some outdoor work is required. Hand to eye coordination is necessary to operate computers and various pieces of office equipment.

While performing the duties of this job, the employee is occasionally required to stand, walk, use hands to finger, handle, feel or operate objects, tools, or controls; and reach with hands and arms. The employee is occasionally required to sit, climb or balance, stoop, kneel, crouch, or crawl, talk or hear, and smell, and frequently sign legal documents and/or plans. The employee must occasionally lift and/or move up to 25 pounds.

ENVIRONMENTAL EL
EMENTS
Employees work in an office environment or in any building or structure within the service area. Work may be performed outdoors with exposure to inclement weather, exposure to noise, dust, grease fumes, gases and potentially hazardous chemicals. Employees may interact with upset staff and/or public and private representatives in interpreting and enforcing departmental policies and procedures
7 Agenda Item: 10m(1)
City Council Meeting of
January 18, 2023
1/10/23

INTERVIEW EVALUATI ON FORM

PLANNING COMMISSION

APPLICANT
Name: G\�N'\ \Joc,J..ison

SECTION A

RESIDENCY IN COMMUNITY & CIVIC EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONAL

CITY/COUNTY INVOLVEMENT EXPERIENCE EXPERIENCE
Knowledge of area Participation in City Application to field of Understanding local (10 pts) commissions and/or civic planning and zoning municipal planning or organizations (10 pts) development ordinances
(10 pts) (10 pts)
SE CTION B - QUESTIONS (10 points each)

1. Why did you apply for this commission?

2. What do you see as the role of a Planning Commissioner?

3. What is your perception of the City's future and how can you facilitate it?

4. What is your understanding of the City's General Plan and its function?

5. Why are you the best choice for this position?
-
Comments: �c� aJ-fadA..-cK
Qualified: (X)yes ( )no
Recommended for further consideration by City Council (X)yes ( )no Evaluated by: N�v £5,'�foc.__

SECTION C - SCORING
Date: January 10, 2023

ATIENDANCEORPARTICWATION
AT PAST PLANNING CO�SSION

MEETINGS
Attendance or participation at past or
current Planning Commission Meetings
(10 pts)
Sec.A Residency/ Involvement / ' Education Profession Experience Attendance / Participation in Total Points for Knowledge of Area Participation Experience meetings Section A /(f} /t:f Id /� /(7 50
Sec.B Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question4 Question 5 Total Points for /() /(/ /t:1 /0 /CJ Section B
S-c1
Grand Total /dC, •

1/09/23

1/10/23

January 4, 2023 Item No. 11a

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of January 18, 2023

ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING

OVERLAY, A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATI ON AND A CORRESPONDING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Consider and approve the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program;

2. Adopt an ordinance establishing an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO); and

3. Adopt a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to Section 2.28 of the Marina General Plan to implement the AHO.

BACKGROUND
Relationship to the Housing Element
The Housing Element is the only element of the General Plan that is mandated by the State of California to be updated with frequency and on cycles as determined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) . The City of Marina ’s (City) Fourth and Fifth Cycles ran from 2007-2014 and 2014-2023, respectively. The City is several years delayed in receiving certification from HCD for its Housing Element . As part of these Cycles, t he City agreed to amend the zoning within the Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan (DVSP) by Spring 2020 to accommodate its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RH NA). To date, this work has not occurred. On February 15, 2022, the City Council awarded a contract to Rincon Consultants, Inc. to modify the DVSP to reduce the subjective element s of the plan per recent changes to state law as well as to create an Affordable Housing Overlay ( AHO) in order for the City to meet its near-term RHNA for the Fourth and Fifth Cycles and bring its Ho using Element into compliance.

For the past several months, Rincon Consultants and City staff have been working on the AHO.

The team has spoken with affordable housing advocates, market rate developers and municipal agency staff from the greater Monterey Bay and Northern California region to bring together the best policies available to support the production of housing in a manner consistent with the goals of the City while also seeking compliance with RHNA requirements. As a result of this effort, the following memo further describes the City’s proposed AHO.

AHO SUMMARY
Overlay zoning is a regulatory tool that creates a special zon ing district, placed over an existing base zone(s), to establish special land use regulati ons, standards, or procedures in a reas with unique land use, site planning, building desig n, or environmental resource issues. An AHO provides a clear list of develop ment standards and incentives for developers who include affordable homes in their multi -family residential development. Add itionally, an AHO encourages production of affordable ho mes rather than requiring it. The AHO is layered on top of established base zoning regulations, leaving in place opportunities for property owners to develop within these existing rules. Rather than i mposing restrictions, an AHO presents property owners with more choices by offering benefits to projects that increase the supply of affordable housing.

1 Generally, the City is seeking to incentivize affordable housing when a developer agrees to build a project between 30 -50 dwelling units per acre and dedicate 12% of the units to very low or 15% to low-income units. If the AHO is adopted, the City would be able to provide documented evidence to HCD that the City can meet its previous RHNA allocation. The A HO would be applied to 23 parcels located within the Dow ntown Marina area with parcel sizes ranging between 0.17 acre and two acres. Properties were selected by the City for inclusion in the AHO and identified on the City Zoning Map (Attachment 1).

The AHO generally includes the following components:
• Allowable uses – These are stated in the proposed zoning code and include multi -family dwellings and dwelling groups, condominiums, accessory dwellings, and home occupations.
• Additional density as compared to b ase zone district – Current base zone districts range in density allowance from one unit per 5,000 square feet (sf) to 43 dwelling u nits per acre. The overlay affords a minimum residential density of 30 dwelling units per acre and a maximum density of 35 d welling units per acre, except for projects proposed alo ng Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard, which would be allowed a maximu m of 50 dwelling units per acre.
• Affordable housing requirement – In order to meet housing needs for a range of incomes, either 12 percent of the development must be dedicated to v ery low-income households or 15 percent must be dedicated to low income households. • Reduced parking standards – Parking standards would be modified for qualifying developments. These standards align w ith existing residential parking standards with the exception of one-to-three-bedroom developments, which would require 1.5 spaces/dwelling unit instead of 2 spaces/dwelling unit. • Additional development standards – Development standards such as setbacks, b uilding height, minimum building site area, open space, and site coverage would be more flexible than existing zoning that allows mu lti-family development and aim to further encourage multi-family residential development on these select sites in the downtown area. • Objective design standards – Design standards focus on creating an attractive downtown area. They include design guidelines such as height transitions, building orientation, entry features, façade composition, win dows, building articulation, parki ng location, concealing mechanical and utility equipment , primary pedestrian access, and privacy.

These standards will be built upon further through the adoption of the DVSP. • Financial incentives – This may include waived, reduced, or deferred planning, pl an check or construction permit fees; deferment of City generated construction and impact fees until project completion or occupancy ; or payment of construction and impact fee over a twelve (12) month or longer period after project completion.

The proposed AHO regulations are included in proposed City Council ordinance included with this report. In speaking with members of the public a few key concerns have been raised:

Community Concerns City Staff Response
The City has identified specific properties fo r
this policy. What happens if I don’t want to
develop my lot?
The AHO is voluntary and does not force its
use. Rather, the overlay specifically provides
that base density/zoning will continue to apply
if an applicant does not want to utilize the
overlay.

2 What is the connection between the AHO
Policy and the DVSP?
Once the DVSP zoning is adopted, it will
replace the underlying base z oning. As stated
previously, either the AHO or the base zoning
would apply. Generally, the development
standards in the AHO (including density) are
consistent with the not yet adopted DVSP.

Will the reduced parking standards provide
adequate parking for future residents?
Reduced parking requirements make multi -
family housing more viable. While the
proposed parking standards dev iate from the
current zoning code, they don’t eliminate the
standards, but instead consider the needs of
future residents and transit proximity.

SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
On September 8, 2022, a study session with the Planning Commiss ion occurred regarding the draft AHO. A summary of the minutes for this item are attached (see Attachment 7), but the major concerns/comments from the Commission were as follows:

Downtown Plan – several questions came up regarding whether the AHO would conflict with the draft DVSP. The AHO will not conflict with this plan; rather, the intent is to ensure consistency between the two projects.

Objective Standards – the Commission did not feel like the AHO had enough objecti ve standards. City staff , working with the consultant team , believes the current standards are adequate for adoption and that the look and feel of buildings utilizing this overlay are consistent with the Marina community. These standards will be further bu ilt upon through adoption of the DVSP.

Specific Sites – the Commission inquired about why specific sites were chosen. The sites were selected in accordance with HCD requirements including that they are more than .5 acre (or adjacent parcels can be consoli dated to sum .5 acre) and less tha n 10 acres, vacant or underutilized, and near transit and services.1

Parking – One of the major concerns raised by the Planning Commission was the lack of parking in the downtown area. For the AHO, the Commission wanted to know if the modest parking reductions proposed for this project would negatively impact the City. . A parking analysis was prepared by Kimley-Horn, which determined that the weekday peak parking demand does not exceed the parking supply requirements of the Marina Municipal Code (MMC or Code). For the purposes of AHO adoption and its minimal deviation from the Code, the AHO parking standards would not exacerbate any perceived parking issues within the downtown. Additionally, the parking ratios in the Code far exceed industry standards as identified by the Urban Land Institute and the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) manual and should be examined more carefully during the final adoption of the DVSP. In response to this community concern, however, as the DVSP is developed through 2023, a more detailed parking study will be prepared. Please se e Attachment 8 (Parking Study) for additional information about the parking details related to the downtown area.

DECEMBER 8, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING

1 See the State HCD website for further details regarding the site inventory criteria:
https://www.hcd.ca.gov/planning-and-community-development/housing-elements/building-blocks/inventory-of- land-suitable
3 On December 8, 2022 the Planning Commiss ion recommended approval to the City Council o f the affordable housing overlay policy. Two minor edits were made to the draft ordinance:

-The Commission wanted it to be clear that making the project have 12% of the units be very low or 15% low was the minimum requirement.
-Additionally, they wanted the overlay units to be re corded with the County so they remained permanent affordable units for at least 55 years.

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
Currently the AHO sites ar e proposed where existing General Plan land use designations and zone districts are in pla ce. While the overlay specifies that a property owner may continue to adhere to the provisions in their base zone district, the following General Plan Amendment s are proposed to remedy inconsistencies with the underlying General Plan land use designation a nd the new AHO designation. To create consistency between the overlay and the Gene ral Plan, a provision shall be added under “Accommodating Future Housing N eeds,” Section 2.28. This section currently addresses the requirement by HCD to assign the Associati on of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) an allocation of regional housing need s through its Regional Housing Needs Plan. The addition , which references a table wi th AHO sites, will read as follows:

The City of Marina may meet its Regional Housing Need s Allocation through the development of Housing Opportunity Sites as shown in Tabl e 2.3 of the Marina General Plan. Additional RHNA capacity shall also be achieved th rough the implementation of an Aff ordable Housing Overlay per the sites listed2

PROJECT TIMELINE
City staff held a meeting with HCD, and it was indicated that if approval of the AHO occurs by the end of the year or shortly thereafter, then the housing sites can be made available within the Fifth Cycle Housing Element planning period, which ends December 15, 2023. If the City does not adopt the AHO within this timeframe, the City would be required to carry over these regional housing units into the next p lanning period, thereby adding to their Sixth Cycle RHNA obligation. Additional fiscal and legal risks are noted further below. In order to meet the early 2023 deadline, City staff proposes the following project schedule:

Virtual Community Meeting with Downtown
Business Owners and Property Owners
Early September 2022
Study Session with the Planning Commission September 8, 2022 CEQA Document Review September 26, 2022 – October 25, 2022 Planning Commission Hearing December 8, 2022
City Council Hearing #1 January 2023
City Council Hearing #2 February 2023

ENVIROMENTAL REVIEW
A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared with a 30-day public comment period September 26, 2022 – October 25, 2022 (see Attachment 4). One (1) comment was received from LandWatch, which City staff responded to and included with this report (see Attachment 6). If the AHO is adopted, the City Council will need to adopt the MND and City staff will have to file a Notice of Determination within five (5) working days of approval.

2 Specific project sites are listed in the body of the draft ordinance. 4 FISCAL IMPACT
It should be not ed that lack of Housing Element compliance with the Stat e of California has far greater fiscal implications for the City:

• Active Transport ation Program (ATP) Funds – Recently, the City’s Public Works Department was inelig ible to file for two million dolla rs in ATP funds to upgrade Imjin Parkway because the City does not have a certified Housing Element.

• Safe Routes to School Funds – The Ci ty did not file for one million dollars in Safe Routes to School funds in 2021 due to not having a Housing Element.

• State Law Compliance – As part of AB 72 (2017 -2018) the California Office of the Attorney General may be notified that the City’s Housing Element is out of compliance with Housing Element law, and the City may be subject to enforcement actions.

• Loss of Local Land Use Controls – The courts may suspend the City’s authority to issue building permits or grant zoning changes, variances, or subdivision map approvals.

• Fees – If a jurisdiction faces a court action stemming from its lack of compliance and either loses or settles the case, it often must pay substantia l attorney fees to the plaintiff’s attorneys in addition to the fees paid to its ow n attorneys. These fees can easily exceed $100,000.

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, City staff and consultants are asking that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to th e City Council to consider the CEQA findings, adopt the proposed ordinance establis hing an AHO and General Plan amendments and do so in an expeditious manner to bring the City into compliance with HCD.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________
Guido F. Persicone, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

_______________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

Attachments

Draft Ordinance
Exhibit A-Finding of Fact
Attachment 1-Overlay Parcels GIS Map
Attachment 2-Overlay Parcels-Excel Spreadsheet
Attachment 3-Overlay Background Material-Terner
Center For Housing Innovation
Attachment 4-Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)
Attachment 5-Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMRP)
Attachment 6-Project Comments and City Responses
Attachment 7-September 8, 2022 Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes (Summary)
Attachment 8-Limited Downtown Parking Study

5 PROPOSED ORDINANCE 2023-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17, ARTICLE 4, OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 17.48.130 “AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY” AND AMENDING SECTION 2.28 OF THE MARINA

GENERAL PLAN

WHEREAS, the Housing Element is the only element of the City of Marina’s (City) General Plan that is mandated by the State of California to be updated with frequency and on cycles as determined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); and

WHEREAS, the City’s Fourth and Fifth Cycles for updates ran from 2007 -2014 and 2014 -2023, respectively; and

WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the City Council awarded a contract to Rincon Consultants, Inc. to modify the Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan (DVSP) and to create an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) in order for the City to meet its near-term Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the Fourth and Fifth Cycles and bring its Housing Element into compliance; and

WHEREAS, on December 8, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission received written and verbal testimony regarding the AHO and recommended adoption of the proposed ordinance to the City Council to establish the AHO; and

WHEREAS, Section 65583 of the Government Code mandates that the City identify and analyze the exi sting and projected housing needs , identify adequate sites for housing and make adequate provision for the exi sting and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community; and

WHEREAS, the AHO serves to implement Housing Element pro grams and address housing needs within the City by encouraging the dev elopment of very low income and low -income affo rdable housing and new multi-family residential development; and

WHEREAS, the AHO implements the Housing Element programs by providing dev elopment regulations to support and incentivize affordable housing and multi-family residential development on designated housing opportunity sites; and

WHEREAS, the AHO shall provide for the continuation of the ability to develop land uses permitted by the existing base (underlying) zoning of a property unless the property is developed for residential uses in accordance with the AHO; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15063, the City prepared an Initial Study to analyze whether the proposed Project may cause a potentially significant effect on the environment; and

WHEREAS, an Initial Study for the Project has been completed pursuant to CEQA that identifies potentially significant effects on the environment which would result from the Project, and concludes that these impacts can be avoided or reduced to a level of insignificance with adoption and implementation of certain mitigation measures therein identified and listed; and

6 WHEREAS, based on this Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mi tigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) has been prepared in accordance with CEQA, which finds that any potentially significant environmental effects of the proposed Project would be sufficiently mitigated to a level of insignificance with implementa tion of mitigation measures specified therein; a complete copy of the MND and MMRP and all supporting exhibits and documents are on file and can be viewed at the City planning office; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15074(d), the City pr epared a program for reporting on and monitoring the changes which it has either required in the proposed Project or made a condition of ap proval to mitigate or avoid potential significant environmental effects (MMRP), a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment 5; and

WHEREAS, the City published a Notice of Intent of the MND and MMRP for the Project on September 26, 2022, which started a 30-day public review period. The notice was posted at the City office, the County Clerk, on the City website, publ ished in the Monterey County Weekly and sent to all property owners whose parcels w ere selected for inclusion in the ordinance, and all interested persons; and

WHEREAS, during the public review and comment p eriod, copies of the MND were available for review and inspection at City Hall , the Community Development Department Permit Center , and on the City’s website; and

WHEREAS, at the January 19, 2023, and February 7, 2023 meetings, the City Council reviewed and considered the MND and MMRP for the Project , any comments received to -date and the responses prepared, invited additional comments from the public; and

WHEREAS, the City Council conducted its own independent analysis of the MND and MMRP and determined that the MND and MMRP were appropriate as ther e is substantial evidence the Project would not result in any significant environmental impacts and the MND reflects the Council’s independent judgment and analysis; and

WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Public Resources Code, the State CEQA Guidelines , and the regulations and policies of the City have been satisfied or complied with by the City in connec tion with the Project; and

WHEREAS, the findings and conclusions made by the City Council in this Ordinance are based upon the oral and written evide nce presented as well as the entirety of the administrative record for the proposed Project, which is inc orporated herein by this reference. The findings are not based solely on the information provided in this Ordinance; and

WHEREAS, the location and cu stodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon the City Council’s decision are located in the Office of City Clerk; and

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Marina does find and ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are adopted as findings of the City Council as though set forth fully herein.

7 SECTION 2. The City Counc il of the City of Marina hereby adopts the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program and approves the Project subject to the findings attached hereto as Exhibit A (Fin dings), Mitigated Negative Declarati on (Attachment 4) and Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program ( Attachment 5), attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

SECTION 3. Amendment of the Code. New section 17.48.130, Affordable Housing Overl ay, is added to Chapter 17. 48 of the Marina Municipal Code , Affordable Housing, and shall read as follows:

17.48.130 Affordable Housing Overlay

A. Purpose and Intent. The Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) serves to implement Housing Element programs and address housing needs within the City b y encouraging the development of very low income and low income affo rdable housing and new multi -family residential development. The AHO implements the Housing Element programs by providing developme nt regulations to support and incentivize affordable hous ing and multi -family residential development on designated housing o pportunity sites. It shall provide for the con tinuation of the ability to develop land uses permitted by the existing base (underl ying) zoning of a property unless the property is developed for residential uses in accordance with the AHO.

B. Applicability. The AHO shall apply to any underlying zone dis trict to support Housing Element programs as designated on the Zoning Map on file at the Community Development Department.

For any housing pr oject developed in accordance with this section, these standards sha ll apply instead of those in the underlying bas e zone district. A property owner may elect to continue to use the site consistent with the underlying zoning district, in which case the applicable underlying district standards will apply.

C. Permitted Uses.

Uses permitted in the AHO shall be as follows:

1. Multiple dwellings and dwelling groups;

2. Condominiums shall be allowed in accordance with the standards allowed in Chapter 17.66.

3. Accessory dwelling units pursuant to the provisions of Section 17.42.040; and

4. Home Occupations pursuant to Section 17.42.110.

D. Application and Review

1. Administrative approval shall be given to residential d evelopment projects that comply with all the requirements of this section. The following process will be f ollowed when an AHO application is filed:
a. Form of Application. An application for a project approval shall be completed on a form provided by the planning department.
b. Administrative Approval. Administrative approval is ministerial in nature and is conducted at the staff leve l under the general direction of the community development director without notice or hearing. A community meeting prior to filing an application is encouraged but not required. Approval shall be granted by the planning department only 8 when the permit appl ication contains sufficient information for the planning department to verify that the proposed use will be consi stent with the standards outlined in this subsection. No building, grading or other construction permit shall be issued by the responsible department until the administrative approval process has been conducted by the planning department. Projects that co mply with the requirements shall be permitted by right. Compliance with the requirements of this section shall not, however, waive any additional requirements for compliance such as an applic ation for a lot line adjustment, merger of parcels, or subdivisio n in conjunction with approval of an application. A separate application for the lot line adjustment, merger of parcels, or appropriate subdivision map shall proceed in accordance with Title 16. c. Approval. The community development director shall approve a ny application if it complies with all requirements of this Section.
d. Notice of Decision. A notice of decision shall be sent to both the applica nt and the applicant's representative (as shown on the application) via first class mail and postage prepaid or email and shall be provided via either of those methods to any person who ha s made a written request for a copy of the decision. The decision of the community development director shall be final and conclusive.
e. Expiration of Administrative Review. Within two (2) years of the date of approval by the community development director, commencement of construction shall have occurred or the approval sha ll become null and void. A one -year extension may be granted by the community development director for good cau se if the project is compl iant with the original approval.

E. General Regulations

1. Relationship to State Density Bonus Law.
a. An application for a pr oject pursuant to this section may apply for a density bonus in accordance with California Government Code Section 65915, as may be amended. At the discretion of the applicant , the incenti ves provided pursuant to the AHO may be combined with the incentives provided pursuant to state density bonus law. b. Illustrative calculation. By way of example, for illustrative p urposes only, where a proposed site consists of .5 acre of land and is propos ed to be developed with a total of fifteen (15) dwelling units, the base density, affordable unit distribution and density bonus under State Density Bonus Law (if requested) would be calculated as follows:

Base density 30 dwelling units/acre
12% restriction 2 very low income units
State Density Bonus Law Additional 38.8% for
12% restriction
Additional units with
Density Bonus

5.82 = 6
Total units for project 21
c. In calculating the required number of units, fractional units of 0.50 or above shall be rounded up to a whole unit.

2. Relationship to inclusionary housing ordina nce. Inclusionary housing in conformance with the General Plan Housing Element and Section 17.48.030 shall be provided for all residential developments or projects. Inclusionary requiremen ts must be met when twenty (20) units are proposed notwithstanding units from a density bonus.
9 F. Development Standards

1. Density.
a. Each lot or parcel of land shall have a minimum residential density of thirty (30) dwelling units per acre . Maximum density for t he development shall be thirty -five (35) dwelling units per acre, ex cept for projects proposed along Reservation Ro ad or Del Monte Boulevard, which shall be a maximum fifty (50) dwelling units per acre. b. Affordable Housing Requirement
i. Either twelve percent (12%) of the development shall be dedicated to very low income house holds or fifteen percent (15%) shall be dedicat ed to low income households. This is the minimum requirement in order to receive the benefits of the overlay policy.
ii. Prior to issuance of bu ilding permits, applicant shall execute an agreement with the City, to be executed by the city manager without revie w by the planning commission or city coun cil, in a form acceptable to the city attorney ensuring the continued affordability of the affordab le dwelling units for a period of not less than fifty-five (55) years. This agreement shall be recorded with the County Recorder.

2. Projects seeking approval pursuant to this section shall be subject to the following development standards:
a. Total Open Spac e R equired. The minimum area of open space required for the development shall be a total of fifteen percent (15%) fo r sites one (1) acre or greater and ten percent (10%) for sites less than one (1) acre. A portion of all of the required usable open space s hall be private as provided by this section; otherwise it shall be shar ed in common.
i. Private Open Space. A minimum of eighty (80) square feet for ground floor units and forty (40) square feet for units located on second levels and above. ii. Common Open Space. Common open space shall average at least twenty-five (25) feet in width and at no time may be less than ten (10) feet in width. b. Building Height. Maximum building height for residential buildings shall be 42 feet, except for projects proposed along Reservation Road or Del Monte Boulevard, which shall be forty-eight (48) feet.
c. Minimum Building Site Area. Building site area shall be a minimum of 6,000 square feet.
d. Site Coverage. No requirement.
e. Setbacks
i. Front yard . Minimum front y ard setback shall be ten (10) feet. The front yard shall be measured fr om the front property line or the edge of eas ement for the private roadway, whichever is less. A maximum front yard setback shall be twenty-five (25) feet for Del Monte Road or Reservation Road. 10 ii. Side yard, Minimum side yard setback shall be five (5) feet, or ten (10) feet if adjacent to side street.
iii. Rear yard. Minimum rear yard setback shall be five (5) feet , or ten (10) feet if adjacent to side street.
f. Parking. Parking re quirements for residential uses permitted under this section shall be a llowed in accordance with Table 1 below. Wher e the residential parking standards in Chapter 17.44.020 may differ, the provisions of this section shall supersede other provisions of the code.

Table 1 Reduced Parking Standards for Qualifying AHO Developments Bedroom Count Base Parking
Standards
Modified Parking Standards for
Qualifying Housing Overlay
Developments
Studio 1 space/dwelling unit 1 space/dwelling unit
1 bedroom 2 spaces/dwelling unit 1.5 spaces/dwelling unit 2-3 bedroom 2 spaces/dwelling unit 1.5 spaces/dwelling unit Guest spaces None required None required

3. Design Standards:
a. Height transitions from adjacent properties. Any portion of a building within twenty (20) feet of the R-1, R-2, or R-3 zone district shall be limited to thirty-five (35) feet in height. b. Building orientation. All new or modified buildings shall orient the primary façade to the primary street. Secondary facades shall front side or rear yards. For co rner buildings, primary facades shall front both primary streets.
c. Entry feature. Porch, stoop, terrace, forecourt, or similar entry features are required for all shared residential entrances. Individual entrances to ground floor units must incorporate a porch, stoop, terrace, walled garden space or private deck.

d. Facade composition. Building facades shall be arra nged in an orderly composition of bays, defined by vertically aligned openings alternating horizonta lly with solid walls or columns. The pat tern sh all be visually expressed through the spacing of openings, recesses, eaves, cornices, overhangs, trellises, exposed rafters, columns, or bay windows. e. Windows. Upper story windows shall be recessed from the wall surface by a minimum or 2” or shall have surface trim and sills.
f. Building articulation.
i. Blank wal ls without windows, doors, or other articulat ion are prohibited. The maximum length of any blank wall shall be limited to twenty (20) feet. ii. Elements such as roof dormers, hips, ga bles, balconies, wall projections and porches are required to break up the mass of building facades. Not less than 40% of the length of a building façade shall be treated with such elements. End units shall have the 11 same design elements as front facades. U narticulated and windowless walls are not allowed.
g. Parking location. Surface parking lots and garages shall be locat ed to the side or rear of buildings or in basements and not adjacent to public roadways. Surface par king shall be prohibited within the fron t 2 5% o f the lot depth. Structured parking shall be screened from the primary frontage.

h. Mechanical and utility equi pment. Mechanical and utility equipment (e.g., heating, cooling, antennas, satellite dishes, air con ditioners, transformers, electric and ga s meters, junction boxes, or similar equipment) shall be concealed with landscaping, walls, or fencing or if roof mounted, with mechanical screens or roof wells. i. Primary pedestrian access . Primary pedestrian access t o building lobbies shall be provided along the sidewalk or permitted open spaces. Parcels longer than 300 feet shall be developed with a mid -block pedestria n paseo or open space. Where paseos are utilized, the placement shall emphasize connectivity to othe r paseos, alleys, or mid-block crossings. Pedestrian paseos may be no less than fifteen (15) feet wide. j. Privacy.
i. Projects within ten ( 10) feet of existi ng buildings along the interior property lines shall reduce direct views into the adjacent building by offsetting or staggering windows and upper story balconies and decks by a minimum of one (1) foot so there is no direct line of sight into the existing building’s windows, balconies, or decks. ii. Balconies, roof decks and other habitable outdoor space are not allowed on upper - story facades directly adjacent to R-1 zones.

G. Incentives. Applications meeting the p urpose and applicability of the AHO will qual ify for one of several incentive options for the creation of housing. The following development ince ntives are available to qualifying residential developments:

1. Waived, reduced, or deferred planning, plan check or construction permit fees;

2. Deferment of cit y generated construction and impact fees until project completion or occupancy; or

3. Payment of constr uction and impact fee over a twelve (12) month or longer period after project completion.

H. Design. Development in any specific plan area shall be subject to the architectural control process identified in that specific plan.

SECTION 4. General Plan Ame ndment. Section 2.28 the Marina General Plan is hereby amended to read as follows (additions shown in italicized, underlined text):

Accommodating Future Housing Needs

2.28 Under California law, each community also has the responsibility to provide housi ng affordable to all income groups. The California Department of Housing and Community Development assigns a share of what it projects to be the statewide housing need to each region in the state. In the Monterey Bay area, AMBAG then allocates the region’s statewide share to local jurisdictions through its Regional Housing Needs Plan. These housing targets are subsequently incorporated into the jurisdictions’ general plans through updates of their housing elements. Through implementation of 12 its Housing Elem ent policies and programs, Marina will c ontinue to enhance the local supply of affordable housing and meet the housing needs of special -needs populations. The City of Marina may meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation through the development of Housing Opportunity Sites as shown in Table 2.3 of the Marina General Plan . Additional RHNA capacity shall also be achieved through the implementation of an Affordable Housing Overlay per the sites listed below:

Additional Housing Opportunity Site Designations

Site Address or
Street APN Gross
Acres
General Plan Land
Use
Additional
Designation
355 Reservation Rd 032121018000 1.00 CI-OR
Housing Opportunity
Site
383 Reservation Rd 032121020000 1.00 CI-OR
Housing Opportunity
Site
Reservation Rd 032121024000 1.00 CI-RPS
Housing Opportunity
Site
435 Reservation Rd 032121042000 1.60 CI-OR
Housing Opportunity
Site
432 Reservation Rd 032141029000 0.70 CI-VS
Housing Opportunity
Site
432 Reservation Rd 032141030000 0.20 CI-VS
Housing Opportunity
Site
205 Mortimer Ln 032192051000 1.20 CI-RPS
Housing Opportunity
Site
271 Carmel Ave 032201003000 1.00 CI-MU
Housing Opportunity
Site
273 Carmel Ave 032201004000 2.00 CI-MU
Housing Opportunity
Site
283 Carmel Ave 032201005000 1.90 CI-MU
Housing Opportunity
Site
271 Carmel Ave. 032201031000 0.17 CI-MU
Housing Opportunity
Site
3102 Crescent Ave 032212016000 0.22 R-MF
Housing Opportunity
Site
3080 Sunset Ave 032291053000 0.28 R-MF
Housing Opportunity
Site
3078 Sunset Ave 032291054000 0.27 R-MF
Housing Opportunity
Site
3070 Del Monte
Blvd 032303015000 0.35 CI-RPS
Housing Opportunity
Site
3074 Del Monte
Blvd 032303039000 0.52 CI-RPS
Housing Opportunity
Site
3038 Del Monte
Blvd 032312014000 0.60 CI-RPS
Housing Opportunity
Site
219 Reindollar Ave 032312019000 0.40 I-LISC
Housing Opportunity
Site
213 Reindollar Ave 032312032000 0.40 I-LISC
Housing Opportunity
Site
13 3006 Hwy 1 032421014000 4.80 I-LISC
Housing Opportunity
Site
327 Reservation Rd 032121025000 0.69 CI-RPS
Housing Opportunity
Site
337 Reservation Rd 032121006000 0.52 CI-OR
Housing Opportunity
Site
365 Reservation Rd 032121019000 1.03 CI-OR
Housing Opportunity
Site

SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shal l not affect the validity of the remaini ng portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares th at it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or mo re sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid.

SECTION 6. Implementation. The City Manage r is directed to execute all documents and to perform all other necessary acts to implement this Ordinance.

SECTION 7. Effective Date . This Ordinan ce shall be in full forc e and effect thirty (30 ) days after its final passage and adoption.

I HEREBY CERT IFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Ordinance passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Marina at a meeting thereof on February 7, 2023 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

__________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

____________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

14 EXHIBIT A- FINDINGS

Affordable Housing Overlay

California Environmental Quality Act Findings
With regard to environmental review, the City Council for the City of Marina (City) has independently reviewed, ana lyzed and considered the Mitig ated Negative Declaratio n (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) and the whole record be fore it (including the Initial Study and any comm ents received) and based on the foregoing, the City Council hereby finds that all environmental impa cts of the Project with mitigation measures are below a level of significance and there is no substantial e vidence supporting a fair argument that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment.

The City Counci l finds the MND and MMRP have been completed in compli ance with CEQA and consistent with the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. The City hereby approves and adopts the MND, which is hereby attached to this Ordinance as Attachment 4. In accordance with Public Resources Code section 21081.6, the City Council hereby adopts the MMR P, which is hereby attached to this Ordinance as Attachment 5.

Zoning Code Amendment Findings
Pursuant to Section 17.72 .010 of the Marina Municipal C ode the Zoning Code or Zoning Districts can be modified if doing so i f findings of fact can be made that do ing so is for the public necessity and convenience and for the general welfare of the City.

If adopted by the City Co uncil, the Affordable Housing Overlay will assist the City in becoming complaint with the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) as dis tributed by the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) in support of the Housing Element Fourth and Fift h Cycles. Implementing this overlay is needed to ensure compliance with state law and for the general welfare of the City so it can mainta in local land use control of development projects moving forward.

General Plan Consistency Findings
Under the provisions of Section 2.28 of the Marina General Plan, the City is mandated to provide housing affordable to all income groups. By adopting the Affordable Housing Overlay the City will ensure compliance with this general plan policy by providing selected sites that can receive a streamlined review process for development projects ensuring housing for all segments of the Marina population.

15 ATTACHMENT A
16 Future DVSP
Zone Site Address or Street APN Gross
Acres Consolidated General Plan Zoning Current Use
Minimum
Density
Allowed
(du/ac)
Maximum
Density
Allowed
(du/ac)
Realistic
Allowable
Density
(du/ac)
Existing
Units
Max Zoned
Capacity
Realistic
Zoned
Capacity
Transition 355 Reservation Rd 032121018000 1.00 CI-OR Vacant 30 50 30 50 30 Transition 383 Reservation Rd 032121020000 1.00 CI-OR Vacant 30 50 30 50 30 Transition Reservation Rd 032121024000 1.00 CI-RPS Vacant 30 50 30 50 30 Transition 435 Reservation Rd 032121042000 1.60 CI-OR Vacant 30 50 30 80 48 Transition 432 Reservation Rd 032141029000 0.70 D CI-VS Vacant 30 50 30 35 21 Transition 432 Reservation Rd 032141030000 0.20 D CI-VS Vacant 30 50 30 10 6 DVSP MFR 205 Mortimer Ln 032192051000 1.20 CI-RPS Vacant 30 35 30 42 36 DVSP MFR 271 Carmel Ave 032201003000 1.00 B CI-MU Vacant 30 35 30 35 30 DVSP MFR 273 Carmel Ave 032201004000 2.00 CI-MU Single Family Residential 30 35 30 2 70 60 DVSP MFR 283 Carmel Ave 032201005000 1.90 CI-MU Single Family Residential 30 35 30 2 66 57 DVSP MFR 271 Carmel Ave. 032201031000 0.17 B CI-MU Vacant 30 35 30 5 5 DVSP MFR 3102 Crescent Ave 032212016000 0.22 R-MF Vacant 30 35 30 7 6 DVSP MFR 3080 Sunset Ave 032291053000 0.28 A R-MF Single Family Residential 30 35 30 1 9 8 DVSP MFR 3078 Sunset Ave 032291054000 0.27 A R-MF Single Family Residential 30 35 30 1 9 8 Transition 3070 Del Monte Blvd 032303015000 0.35 C CI-RPS Single Family Residential 30 50 30 1 17 10 Transition 3074 Del Monte Blvd 032303039000 0.52 C CI-RPS Three Unit Retail Strip 30 50 30 26 15 Transition 3038 Del Monte Blvd 032312014000 0.60 CI-RPS Restaurant 30 50 30 30 18 Transition 219 Reindollar Ave 032312019000 0.40 I-LISC Vacant 30 35 30 14 12 Transition 213 Reindollar Ave 032312032000 0.40 I-LISC Vacant 30 35 30 14 12 Transition 3006 Hwy 1 032421014000 4.80 I-LISC Vacant 30 35 30 168 144 Transition 327 Reservation Rd 032121025000 0.69 CI-RPS Single Family Residential 30 50 30 34 20 Transition 337 Reservation Rd 032121006000 0.52 CI-OR Single Family Residential 30 50 30 26 15 Transition 365 Reservation Rd 032121019000 1.03 CI-OR Suburban Propane 30 50 30 51 30

21.85 898 651
5th Cycle
Goal 612
ATTACHMENT 2
17 Potential
Minus
Existing
Income
Category
Lower Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Above
Moderate
Income Units
Proximity to Transit Center Notes
30 Lower 30 Within 1/2 Mile
30 Lower 30 Within 1/2 Mile
30 Lower 30 Within 1/2 Mile
48 Lower 48 Greater than 1/2 Mile
21 Lower 21 Greater than 1/2 Mile
6 Lower 6 Greater than 1/2 Mile
36 Lower 36 Within 1/2 Mile
30 Lower 30 Within 1/2 Mile Underutilized, Owner intends to develop soon, 100% residential, Combined with 271 E. Carmel 58 Lower 58 Within 1/2 Mile Renter occupied, Underutilized, New ownership plans to develop soon 55 Lower 55 Within 1/2 Mile Renter occupied, Underutilized, Current recycling trend of similar properties is active 5 Lower 5 Within 1/2 Mile Underutilized, Owner intends to develop soon, 100% residential, Combined with 271 E. Carmel 6 Moderate 6 Within 1/2 Mile
7 Lower 7 Within 1/2 Mile
7 Lower 7 Within 1/2 Mile
9 Lower 9 Within 1/2 Mile
15 Lower 15 Within 1/2 Mile Property is underutilized and owner has explicitly indicated the intent to redevelop the property with residential mixed use. 18 Lower 18 Greater than 1/2 Mile
12 Moderate 12 Greater than 1/2 Mile
12 Moderate 12 Greater than 1/2 Mile
144 Lower 144 Greater than 1/2 Mile
20 Lower 20 Within 1/2 Mile
15 Lower 15 Within 1/2 Mile
30 Lower 30 Within 1/2 Mile
614 30
ATTACHMENT 2
18 W
hile every city in California must adopt plans and land use regulations that provide opportunities for—and do
not unduly constrain—housing development, very few cities zone for affordable housing in an explicit way. First introduced to Cali- fornia land use plans in early 2000, Affordable Housing Overlay Zones (AHO or HOZ) have become a flexible mechanism through which cities can prioritize and direct affordable housing develop- ment to site-specific zones. Overlay zones are flexible not only in format but also in the various land uses that they can regulate.

For example, these zones are widely used to preserve historic buildings and areas in historic districts. Other common overlay districts include airport noise impact zones, highway corridor overlay districts, agricultural overlay districts, and planned unit development (PUD) overlay zones.
1 One of the first cities in California to adopt an AHO, Oakley up-zoned more than 16 acres from light industrial and commer - cial uses to “by-right” multifamily development during its compre- hensive rezone in 2005. Since its enactment, seven affordable housing developments, totaling 509 units for low-income fami- lies and seniors, have been built because of Oakley’s AHO. The following case study demonstrates how AHOs provide a flexible tool that cities can use to prioritize affordable housing and direct development to site-specific zones.

Background
Located in eastern Contra Costa County on the western edge of San Joaquin Valley, Oakley is a rapidly growing
2 city in the San
Francisco Bay Area. Over the past twenty years, this agricultural community experienced dramatic growth due to its location at the intersection of State Routes 4 and 160, which provide access to San Francisco, San Jose, Sacramento, and the Central Valley.

Responding to an increase in population and a desire to control local growth and development decisions, Oakley incorporated in 1999. Incorporation occurs when corporate powers form a city, shifting local government responsibility of an unincorporated area from the County Board of Supervisors to a newly-established city council.
3 Areas incorporate for a variety of reasons, but the most common reason is to shift the locus of power from the county to the city, thereby giving a community local control over land use planning and creating a locally-accountable governing body.

Once incorporated, Oakley was required to develop a land use plan, having previously relied on the land use and circulation policies outlined in the Contra Costa County General Plan. To establish consistency between Oakley’s new General Plan, resi - dential land uses, and updated Zoning Ordinances, Oakley needed to rezone approximately 2,240 acres. Additionally, under state-mandated housing element law,
4 Oakley also had to make
adequate provisions for the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community based on its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA).
5 Despite a need for affordable housing, the newly-formed city struggled to reach consensus on how to plan for affordable housing, with some residents expressing concern that incoming growth would disrupt the small-town character of the community, bringing with it increased crime, lowered property values, and traffic congestion.
6 In 2001, anti-housing sentiment amidst a small
coalition of residents ran so high over an affordable multifamily development that the incoming city council was almost disbanded A Terner Center Case Study • April 2019
1 Affordable Housing Overlay
Zones: Oakley
Copyright 2019 Terner Center for Housing Innovation
For more information on the Terner Center, see our website at www.ternercenter.berkeley.edu
This brief is part of the Terner Center series “Statewide Goals, Local Tools: Case Studies in Affordable Housing Development in California. ”
ATTACHMENT 3
19 during the incorporation process (the site was later approved and converted to affordable senior housing). 7 However, not all resi- dents were against new affordable housing development. Analysis of Oakley’s inaugural Housing Workshop in 2002 shows that when asked what types of affordable housing the city should focus on, over 25 percent of participating residents supported multifamily development.
8 When asked how the city should assist in the
development of affordable housing, roughly 67 percent supported increased densities or density bonuses.
9 Affordable Housing
Overlay Zones are one way in which Oakley ultimately opted to increase its housing density.

Affordable Housing Overlay Zones
AHO zones work by placing an additional zoning layer over base zoning designations. They encourage the production of afford - able housing by providing incentive packages to developers who include affordable housing in their projects, such as impact fee waivers, enhanced density bonuses, reduced parking ratios, changes to setback requirements, relaxed height standards, and by-right zoning. To qualify, developers must meet baseline afford- ability qualifications pursuant to local zoning code. Typically, an AHO will require that between 25 and 100 percent of units in a development be affordable for households earning 50 to 80 percent of Area Median Income (AMI).

In addition, AHOs can expedite the approval and permit processes for affordable housing projects that might otherwise require an amendment to a general plan. In places where land is not zoned for residential use but where a city would like to see afford - able housing built, an AHO may eliminate lengthy entitlement processes. For example, a project may require an independent review by a building department, health department, fire depart - ment, planning commission, and city council. Each layer of review can increase project approval time and cost to the developer. By creating exemptions that streamline project approvals, municipal- ities can encourage the development of affordable homes without additional costs to government or developers.

In addition to California’s Density Bonus Law (SDBL),
10 which
provides incentives to encourage the production of affordable housing, especially in infill locations, AHOs can offer greater incen- tives—both in number and scope—including density bonuses that exceed the SDBL, by-right zoning, or streamlined administrative approvals of projects. Because incentives are contained within the AHO Zoning Ordinance, communities and developers are guaranteed a greater level of clarity and predictability of develop- ment standards and processes while also codifying a community’s commitment to encouraging affordable housing through its land use regulations.

Unlike inclusionary zoning that requires either the building of affordable housing or the payment of an in-lieu fee, AHOs are incentive-based, offering developers key concessions in exchange for producing affordable housing. Both AHOs and Inclusionary Housing Ordinances can be used as complementary tools along with other housing policies.

A Terner Center Case Study • April 2019
2 AHO policies should be centered on four basic guidelines custom- ized to best fit community needs.11 They are:
» Geographic scope of applicability. An effective AHO
should have a broad geographic applicability, including in lower-density or commercial zones. AHOs can also comple- ment other state and local housing policies and site-specific plans, including Priority Development Areas (PDAs) and
sites with access to transit, amenities, and job centers. » Baseline affordability qualifications for developments to access AHO incentives. By establishing meaningful
threshold requirements, AHOs can encourage the develop- ment of affordable housing for multiple tiers of low-income units identified in RHNA. To qualify, developers generally must make between 25 and 100 percent of the units afford- able for households earning 50 to 80 percent of AMI.
» Incentives given to qualified developments. A successful AHO can provide far greater incentives than the SDBL,
thereby further encouraging developers to produce
affordable housing. Types of incentives include enhanced density bonuses, reduced parking ratios, expedited permit processing, increased allowable heights, by-right zoning or administrative approvals, in-lieu fees, and impact fee waivers. Determining the most effective balance of incen- tives depends on local communities. However, it should be noted that an AHO can be used in conjunction with SDBL. » The extent of exemptions from discretionary project-level approvals. During the project-level approvals process, a city might require discretionary review to confirm a project’s compliance with the City Zoning Code. Each layer of review can increase project approval time and cost to the devel- oper. By creating exemptions that streamline the approvals process, municipalities can expedite the development of affordable homes while reducing overall development costs.

Oakley’s AHO was established in response to state mandate. In June 2005, the Department of Housing and Community Devel - opment (HCD), citing an insufficient number of vacant parcels designated for Multifamily High (MFH) development to accom - modate the city’s remaining housing needs for low- and very-low- income groups, issued a “conditional certification”
12 for Oakley’s
2001-2007 housing element. The certification was conditioned upon the city adopting an AHO zone.

For Oakley, adopting an AHO zone would cater to demands from both the state and city residents. An AHO would address divergent views amongst the constituency on planning, implementing, and developing affordable housing. In addition, by certifying its housing element, Oakley could procure funding from the Contra Costa Measure C Growth Management
13 program and other state
and federal funding programs the city needed to improve other vital community needs like infrastructure and municipal services. 14 Oakley’s AHO zone was structured as follows. First, it rezoned 16.3 acres to MFH
15 density. After considering more than a dozen sites,
the council approved the rezoning on Carol Lane, selected due to ATTACHMENT 3
20 A Terner Center Case Study • April 2019
3 its proximity to commercial services, schools, parks, and transit.

To encourage high-density development, the city offered several incentives, including reduced parking standards, reduced setback requirements, fee waivers, and a density bonus for proposed devel- opments in this region. Second, it required that affordable housing built in the AHO (and that received the incentives or benefits of AHO zoning) remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years. Third, it set a base density of 24 units per acre. This density is lower than the state’s default (30 units per acre) for cities in the region, but the city council lowered the base density in response to resident concerns over higher density development in the city.

Implementation
Oakley’s AHO program proved successful in increasing the number of multifamily units and meeting the city’s RHNA for very-low and low-income categories. In 2006, the non-profit developer Corporation for Better Housing (CBH) purchased the 16.3-acre site, developing a multi-phase, 100-percent affordable housing project spanning over a decade on the site. The city worked and continues to work with CBH to increase affordable housing on the Carol Lane site to accommodate future RHNA targets (Table 1).

Over the course of a decade, this site has constructed a total of 434 affordable housing units. In a region reputed for its lack of affordable housing and inability to meet regional housing needs, Oakley’s AHO has produced beyond the requisite housing needed for lower-income households.
16 Table 1: Housing Estimates for Oakley
2000 change 2008 change 2016
All Housing Units 7,946 +35% 10,748 +14% 12,294
Single Family Units 7,363 +39% 10,228 +12% 11,412
Multifamily Units 164 -18% 134 +278% 506
Source: California Department of Finance Population and Housing Estimates Oakley city administrators had difficulty interpreting the AHO in relation to the SDBL. What was not clear to the city was that, under SDBL, cities are required to approve additional density bonuses of up to 35 percent over the base density for qualified affordable housing projects.
17 The council and city residents had interpreted
the negotiated AHO density of 24 units per acres as the maximum density allowed under SBDL. Instead, to their “surprise and disap- pointment, ”
18 an affordable housing builder could submit a subse-
quent density bonus application to attain a capacity of up to 32.4 units per acre (i.e., 35 percent over the ABO density threshold).

For the city, the state mandates regarding the requirements of an AHO zone and the SDBL essentially removed the “city’s discretion regarding the final density of the project. ”
19 AHO zones can supplement a city’s comprehensive housing affordability strategy by targeting certain areas for more stream - lined affordable housing development. In addition to increasing affordable housing production, this tool could be used to further fair housing goals—counteracting patterns of socioeconomic and racial segregation that were historically perpetuated through housing development—if neighborhoods of high opportunity are conscientiously selected.

Lessons Learned
» AHO zones can provide a flexible tool to increase the supply of affordable housing. Overlay zones present an attractive alternative to municipalities interested in offering additional benefits to an already-zoned parcel to encourage affordable housing. They offer more flexibility as they may be tailored to be site-specific, or encompass a larger area to promote devel- opment in targeted areas that align with other state and local policy goals (e.g. RHNA, SB 375, PDAs).
» AHOs encourage the development of affordable homes
without additional costs to the government or devel-
opers. Because zoning decisions have financial benefits to developers, AHOs create value without relying on direct city expenditures. For example, on sites where land is not zoned for residential use but where a city would like to see affordable housing, AHOs may eliminate lengthy entitlement processes, including the need to amend the general plan.
» Technical support is essential to optimize AHO benefits for both the developer and community. Clarity on how overlay zones work when layered with other housing policies such as SDBL ensures that overlay zones meet the community’s planning and strategic goals around land use and affordable housing, and that they are used as defined. In addition, clearly conveying the valuable housing incentives contained in
AHOs can help developers leverage lower development costs and increase the number of affordable homes they construct.

Useful Sources
ABAG, Housing Overlay Zone
http://housing.abag.ca.gov/policysearch
ATTACHMENT 3
21 A Terner Center Case Study • April 2019
4 1. Blackwell, R. (1989). “Overly Zoning, Performance Standards, and Environmental Protection After Nollan, ” Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 16, no. 3: 615–59.

2. City of Oakley and City of Oakley. (2015). “2015-2023 Housing Element. ” City of Oakley.

Between 2000-2010, Oakley experienced a 38 percent population increase, more than three times faster than the county’s growth rate of 10 percent.

3. This process is accomplished under the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, the law governing Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCOs) and local government orga- nizational changes. Stanislaus County LAFCO. (2012). “ A Citizen’s Guide to the Incorporation Process. ” Stanislaus County LAFCO. The Act establishes procedures for local government changes of organization, including city incorporations, annexations to a city or special district, and city and special district consol- idations. Local agency formation commissions (LAFCOs) have numerous powers under the act, but those of primary concern are the power to act on local agency boundary changes, and to adopt spheres of influ - ence for local agencies. Among the purposes of LAFCOs are the discouragement of urban sprawl and the encouragement of the orderly formation and development of local agencies.

4. California Gov’t Code § 65583.

5. Since 1980, the State of California has required each jurisdiction plan for its share of the state’s housing need for people of all income levels (California Gov’t Code § 65583). The Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) (California Gov’t Code §65583(c)(1) & §65583.2(h)) is the process by which each community is assigned its share of the housing need for an eight-year period. Each jurisdiction’s responsibility for planning for housing is divided in into four income categories that address all levels of housing afford- ability: very low-income (50 percent or less of AMI; low-income (50-80 percent of AMI); moderate-income (80-120 percent of AMI); and above-moderate (more than 120 percent of AMI). COGs calculate housing needs by looking at population and employment growth, existing employment, and household and employ- ment growth near transit in the entire region and in each city or town. A jurisdiction’s housing needs obliga- tion reflects its share of regional growth. Once a jurisdiction receives its RHNA, it must update the housing element of its General Plan to show how it plans to meet the housing needs of its community.

6. Annonymous Interview, interview by Liana Arnold, Telephone Interview, December 5, 2016.

7. Ibid.

8. Thompson, B. (2002). “Joint General Plan Workshop - City Council and Planning Commission. ” City of Oakley 6.

9. Ibid.

10. Enacted in 1979, Density Bonus Law (California Gov’t Code § 65915, et seq.) offers incentives to devel - opers who include a percentage of units in a housing development to low- or very low-income households.

In exchange, the city or county must grant the developer up to three itemized concessions and a “density bonus, ” which allows the development to increase the density of the development by a certain percentage above the maximum allowable limit under local zoning law. A key requirement is that developers require an affordability period of 55 years for all density bonus units.

11. Public Advocates and East Bay Housing Organization. (2010). “Factsheet: Housing Overlay Zones. ” Public Advocates.

12. The Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) can find local housing elements in compliance with state housing element law subject to certain conditions, thereby issuing a conditional approval (commonly called “conditional certifications”). These conditions most frequently require local agencies to rezone, but, on occasion, require the actual construction of promised affordable housing proj- ects or a record of project approvals.

Endnotes
ATTACHMENT 3
22 A Terner Center Case Study • April 2019
5 13. Contra Costa Transportation Authority. “Growth Management Program (GMP). ” Contra Costa Transpor- tation Authority. Retrieved from: http://www.ccta.net/sources/detail/8/1.

14. Ryan, J. and Raney, T. (2004). “City of Oakley Housing Element Memorandum. ”

15. City of Oakley Municipal Code. (2016). “Chapter 9.1 ZONING, ” Code Publishing Company. Accessed:
http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Oakley/html/Oakley09/Oakley091.html.

The AHO applies only to areas zoned Multiple Family Residential (M-9, M-12, M-17) and where an appli- cant has applied for, and the City Council has approved a density bonus in accordance with § 9.1.412 to meet the City Regional Housing Needs Assessment.

16. Association of Bay Area Government. (2015). “San Francisco Bay Area Progress in Meeting 2007-2014 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). ” Association of Bay Area Governments. During the 4th Cycle, Oakley met its RHNA by 111 percent for very-low, and 159 percent for low-income categories. When compared to other cities in Contra Costa County, Oakley was second to El Cerrito (159 percent) in permit- ting units for very low-income household and ranked highest in permitting low-income units.

17. Cities and counties are required to grant a density bonus and other incentives or concessions to housing projects that include affordable and/or senior housing in their development. The amount of the density bonus is set on a sliding scale, based upon the percentage of affordable units at each income level.

18. City of Oakley. (2009). “Work Session Regarding the State-Mandated Housing Element Update. ” City of Oakley.

19. Ibid.

ATTACHMENT 3
23 A Terner Center Case Study • April 2019
6 Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Liana Arnold, Echo Bergquist, and Sarah Mawhorter for their contributions to the research and authorship of these case studies. We’re deeply grateful to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the funding that made this work possible. Finally, we would like to thank each of the local officials and stakeholders who shared their knowledge and experience through the interviews documented in these case studies.

ATTACHMENT 3
24 City of Marina Affordable Housing
Overlay Initial Study-Mitigated
Negative Declaration
Link:
https://www.cityofmarina.org/945/Environ
mental-Review
ATTACHMENT 4
25 City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay
Final IS-MND
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
ATTACHMENT 5
26 Mitiga
tion Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Initial S
tudy – Mitigated Negative Declaration 13

CEQA requ
ires that a reporting or monitoring program be adopted for the conditions of project approval that are necessary to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. This mitigation monitoring and reporting program is intended to track and ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures during the project implementation phase. For each mitigation measure recommended in the Final IS-MND, specifications are made herein that identify the action required, the monitoring that must occur, and the agency or department responsible for oversight.

The following table lists mitigation measures from the Final IS-MND that are necessary to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.

Rep
orting Pro
gram
Mitigation Monitoring and
ATTACHMENT 5
27 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

14 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
Air Quality

AQ-1:

Construction Dust Control Measures
Construction/demolition activities within AHO
sites shall be limited to 8.1 acres per day with
minimal earthmoving, or 2.2 acres per day with
demolition or grading/excavation, consistent
with the screening-level thresholds in the
MBARD’s 2008 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, or
consistent with any updated air quality
guidelines approved by the MBARD. Any
individual construction project that would
require grading, excavation, and/or soil material
import or export within the AHO sites shall
implement the following construction dust
control measures:
 Water all active construction areas at least
twice daily.
 Prohibit all grading activities during periods
of high wind (over 15 miles per hour).
 Apply chemical soil stabilizers on inactive
construction areas (disturbed lands within
construction projects that are unused for at
least four consecutive days).
 Apply non-toxic binders (e.g., latex acrylic
copolymer) to exposed areas after cut and
fill operations and hydroseed area.
 Haul trucks shall maintain at least 2 feet of
freeboard.
 Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, or loose
materials.
 Plant tree windbreaks on the windward
perimeter of construction projects if
adjacent to open land.
 Plant vegetative ground cover in disturbed
areas as soon as possible.
 Cover inactive storage piles.

Development projects shall be limited
to 8.1 acres per day of limited
earthmoving or 2.2 acres per day with
demolition or grading/excavation.

Development projects that would
require grading, excavation, and/or
soil material import or export within
the AHO sites shall implement
MBARD construction dust control
measures.

During
construction
As needed
during
construction
City of Marina
Community
Development
Department

ATTACHMENT 5
28 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 15
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
 Install whee
l washers at the entrance to
constructio
n sites for all exiting trucks.
 Pave all roads on construction sites.
 Sweep streets if visible soil material is
carried out from the construction site.
 Post a publicly visible sign which specifies
the telephone number and person to
contact regarding dust complaints. This
person shall respond to complaints and take
corrective action within 48 hours. The phone
number of the Monterey Bay Air Resources
District shall be visible to ensure compliance
with Rule 402 (Nuisance).
 Limit the area under construction at any one
time.

Biological Resource
s
BIO-1(a): Biol
ogical Resources Screening and Assessment
For projects proposed
for development within
undeveloped or partially developed areas
containing natural or ruderal areas (as depicted
in Figure 5 [of the Draft IS-MND]), prior to the
issuance of building or grading permits, the City
shall engage a qualified biologist to perform a
preliminary biological resource screening. The
purpose of the screening and assessment is to
determine whether the project has any potential
to impact special status biological resources,
inclusive of special status plants and animals,
sensitive vegetation communities, jurisdictional
waters (including creeks, drainages, streams,
ponds, vernal pools, riparian areas and other
wetlands), or biological resources protected
under local or regional ordinances. If it is
determined that the project has no potential to
impact biological resources, no further action is
required.

The City shall engage a qualified
biologist to perform a biological
resource screening for projects within
undeveloped or partially developed
areas. If the project would have the
potential to impact biological
resources, a qualified biologist shall
conduct a project-specific biological
analysis to document the existing
biological resources within a project
footprint plus a minimum buffer of
100 feet around the project footprint,
as is feasible, and to determine the
potential impacts to those resources.

The qualified biologist shall determine
which of the following mitigation
measures [BIO-1(b) through BIO-1(g)]
shall be incorporated. All projects
developed within AHO sites,
Prior to the
issuance of
building or
grading permits
Once City of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
qualified
biologist

ATTACHMENT 5
29 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

16 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
If the proje
ct would have the potential to impact
biological resources, prior t
o construction, a
qualified biologist shall conduct a project-
specific biological analysis to document the
existing biological resources within a project
footprint plus a minimum buffer of 100 feet
around the project footprint, as is feasible, and
to determine the potential impacts to those
resources. If the project would have the
potential to impact biological resources, the
following mitigation measures [BIO-1(b) through
BIO-1(g)] shall be incorporated, as determined
to be applicable by the qualified biologist, to
reduce impacts to a less than significant.

Pending the results of the project-specific
biological analysis, design alterations, further
technical studies (e.g., protocol surveys) and
consultations with the USFWS, NMFS, CDFW,
and/or other local, State, and federal agencies
may be required. Note that specific surveys
described in the mitigation measures below may
be completed as part of the project-specific
biological analysis where suitable habitat is
present. All projects developed within AHO sites,
regardless of site conditions, are required to
implement measures BIO-1(f) and BIO-1(g).
regardless
of site conditions, are
required to imple
ment measures BIO-
1(f) and BIO-1(g).

BIO-1(b): S
pecial Status Plant Pre-Construction Survey
Projects identified as having potential to impact
special status plant species during the biological
screening and assessment under Mitigation
Measure BIO-1(a) shall implement Mitigation
Measure BIO-1(b). Surveys for special status
plants shall be completed by the project
proponent prior to any vegetation removal,
grubbing, or other construction activity
(including staging and mobilization). The surveys
shall be floristic in nature, that is, every plant
Complete special status plant species
survey
Prior to
construction
As needed prior
to construction
City of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
qualified
biologist

Submit report special status plant
species report to the City
Prior to
construction
Once
Consult with CDF
W and/or USFWS Prior to
construction
As needed prior
to construction
ATTACHMENT 5
30 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 17
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
observed shall b
e identified to species
subspecies,
or variety, sufficient to identify listed
plants. The surveys shall be seasonally timed to
coincide with the target Federal and State listed
species and rare plants identified above. All
plant surveys shall be conducted by a City-
approved biologist during the appropriate
blooming period during the year prior to initial
ground disturbance. All special status plant
species identified on-site shall be mapped onto
a site-specific aerial photograph or topographic
map with the use of Global Positioning System
(GPS) unit. Surveys shall be conducted in
accordance with the most current protocols
established by the CDFW, USFWS, and the local
jurisdictions if said protocols exist. A report of
the survey results shall be submitted to the City.

If impacts to federal or state-listed species are
identified for an individual project, consultation
with CDFW and/or USFWS, as appropriate, shall
be undertaken by the project applicant.

BIO-1(c): S
pecial Status Plant Species Avoidance, Minimization, Mitigation If Federal and/or State listed or CRPR List 1B or 2
species are found during special status plant
pre-construction surveys [required under
Mitigation Measure BIO-1(b)], avoidance of, or
mitigation for impacts to, occupied habitat shall
be required. If populations of CRPR List 1B or 2
species are found during special status plant
pre-construction surveys, the City-approved
biologist shall evaluate whether the loss of
occupied areas would result in a local or regional
population-level impact (i.e., jeopardize the
continued existence of a local or regional
Redesign individual development
projects as needed to avoid federally
and/or state listed species
After
completion of
the surveys
described in
Mitigation
Measure BIO-
1(b)
Once City of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
qualified
biologist

Demarcate areas with listed and
special status plant or their habitats
that are not within the immediate
disturbance footprint but are located
within 50 feet of disturbance limits
Prior to
construction
activities near
these areas
As needed
during
construction
ATTACHMENT 5
31 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

18 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
populati
on). Mitigation for regional population
level impacts
to rare plants shall be required by
the City. If feasible, individual development
projects shall be re-designed to avoid
development in locations of Federal and/or
State listed or CRPR List 1B or 2 species. Federal
and/or State listed or CRPR List 1B or 2 species
occurrences that are not within the immediate
disturbance footprint and would be avoided, but
which are located within 50 feet of disturbance
limits, shall have bright orange protective
fencing installed at an appropriate distance (as
determined by a qualified biologist) to ensure
they are protected during construction
activities.

If development cannot avoid Federally or State
listed plants species, then a qualified biologist
shall either salvage or conserve any relocated
individual plants, or the project applicant shall
provide compensation (minimum compensation
ratio of 1:1 for individuals and impact areas,
with a conservation area of a similar density of
individuals) for the loss of these individuals or
their habitat either in an on-site or off-site
preserve, through payments to an appropriate
mitigation bank, or as otherwise may be
determined in coordination with USFWS and
CDFW permitting.

Restoration areas shall be of a similar density of
individuals as areas impacted project activities.

A restoration plan shall be prepared by the
project applicant and submitted to the City for
review and approval. Documentation
demonstrating consultation with CDFW and
USFWS regarding impacts to federal or state
listed species shall be submitted to the City.

Population level impacts to CRPR List 1B or 2
If special status plant populations
cannot be avoided and will be
impacted, mitigate impacts at a
minimum ratio of 1:1 for occupied
habitat area or through compensatory
mitigation.

Prior to
occupancy
As needed
If special stat
us plant populations
cannot be avoided and will be
impacted, prepare restoration plan
and consult with CDFW and USFWS
Prior to
construction
activities that
would impact
the resources
described in the
measure
As needed
ATTACHMENT 5
32 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 19
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
species s
hall also be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio for
occupied
areas, and shall also require a
restoration plan in coordination with the City.

The restoration plan(s) shall include, at a
minimum, the following components:
 Description of the project/affected species
location(s) (i.e., location, responsible parties,
areas to be impacted by habitat type)
 Compensatory mitigation [type(s) and
area(s) species to be established, restored,
enhanced, and/or preserved; specific
functions and values of species type(s) to
be established, restored, enhanced, and/or
preserved]
 Description of the proposed compensatory
mitigation site (location and size, ownership
status, existing functions and values)
 Implementation plan for the compensatory
mitigation site (rationale for expecting
implementation success, responsible parties,
schedule, site preparation, planting plan)
 Maintenance activities during the
monitoring period, including weed removal
as appropriate (activities, responsible
parties, schedule)
 Monitoring plan for the compensatory
mitigation site, including no less than
quarterly monitoring for the first year
(performance standards, target functions
and values, target acreages to be
established, restored, enhanced, and/or
preserved, annual monitoring reports)
 Success criteria based on the goals and
measurable objectives; said criteria to be, at
a minimum, at least 80 percent survival of
container plants and 30 percent relative
cover by vegetation type
ATTACHMENT 5
33 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

20 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
 An adaptive ma
nagement program and
remedial measures to add
ress any
shortcomings in meeting success criteria
 Notification of completion of compensatory
mitigation and agency confirmation
 Contingency measures (initiating
procedures, alternative locations for
contingency compensatory mitigation,
funding mechanism)
BIO-1(d): S
pecial Status Wildlife Pre-Construction Surveys
Projects that identify potential impacts to
special status wildlife species during the
biological screening and assessment under
Mitigation Measure BIO-1(a) shall implement
the following.

Burrowing Owl Surveys
A qualified biologist shall conduct pre-
construction clearance surveys prior to ground
disturbance activities within suitable natural
habitats and ruderal areas to confirm the
presence/absence of burrowing owls. The
surveys shall be consistent with the
recommended survey methodology provided by
CDFW (2012). Clearance surveys shall be
conducted within 14 days prior to construction
and ground disturbance activities. If no
burrowing owls are observed, no further actions
are required. If burrowing owls are detected
during the pre-construction clearance surveys,
the following measures shall apply:
 Avoidance buffers during the breeding and
non-breeding season shall be implemented
in accordance with the CDFW (2012) and
Burrowing Owl Consortium (1993)
minimization mitigation measures.

Conduct burrowing owl surveys Within 30 days
prior to
construction in
areas containing
suitable habitat
Once of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
qualified
biologist

Conduct Smith’s blue butterfly host
plant surveys and mitigation
During the host
plant blooming
season prior to
construction in
areas containing
suitable habitat
Once
Prepare repo
rts for the surveys listed
above
Prior to
construction for
which surveys
were required
Once
ATTACHMENT 5
34 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 21
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
 If avoid
ance of burrowing owls is not
feasibl
e, then additional measures such as
passive relocation during the nonbreeding
season and construction buffers of 200 feet
during the breeding season shall be
implemented, in consultation with CDFW. In
addition, a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan
and Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be
developed by a qualified biologist in
accordance with the CDFW (2012) and
Burrowing Owl Consortium (1993).

Smith’s Blue Butterfly Host Plant Surveys
Prior to grading and construction in
undeveloped areas, an approved biologist shall
conduct surveys for seacliff buckwheat
(Eriogonum parvifolium) and seaside buckwheat
(Eriogonum latifolium), host plants of Smith’s
blue butterfly in areas of suitable habitat.

If Smith’s blue butterfly host plants are not
located, no further action is required. If host
plants are located within proposed disturbance
areas, they shall be avoided if feasible. If
avoidance is not feasible, focused surveys shall
be conducted to determine presence or absence
of the butterfly species. This shall include
surveys during the adult flight period (mid-June
through early September), and/or inspection of
host plants for all life forms (egg, larva, pupa,
and adult). Relocation of smith’s blue butterfly
and occupied host plants can only be legally
authorized by the USFWS, and only a USFWS
permitted biologist is legally allowed to relocate
host plants and individuals.

Reporting
A report of all pre-construction and pre-
demolition survey results shall be submitted to
ATTACHMENT 5
35 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

22 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
the City for its r
eview prior to the start of
demolition
. The report shall include a
description of the survey methodology for each
species, the environmental conditions at the
time of the survey(s), the results of the survey,
any requirements for addressing special status
species identified during surveys, and the
biological qualifications of the surveyors. The
report shall be accompanied by maps and
figures showing the location of any special
status species occurrences and associated
avoidance buffers.

BIO-1(e): B
iological Resources Avoidance and Minimization
Projects that identify potential impacts to
special status species during the biological
screening and assessment under Mitigation
Measure BIO-1(a) shall implement the following
measures to avoid impacts to sensitive species
and biological resources. The project applicant
shall be responsible for implementing selected
measures.
 Ground disturbance shall be limited to the
minimum necessary to complete the project.

The limits of disturbance for each
construction phase shall be flagged. Areas of
special biological concern within or adjacent
to the limits of disturbance shall have highly
visible orange construction fencing installed
between said area and the limits of
disturbance.
 All construction occurring within or adjacent
to natural habitats that may support
Federally and/or State listed
endangered/threatened species, State fully
protected species, and/or special status
species shall have a qualified biological
Implement biological resources
avoidance and minimization measures

During

construction
Ongoing during
construction
City of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
qualified
biologist

Conduct biological monitoring for all
initial ground disturbance activity
During
construction
Ongoing as
needed during
construction
Oversee and monitor bio
logical
resources mitigation compliance
During
construction
Ongoing
throughout
construction
phase
ATTACHMENT 5
36 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 23
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
monitor present during al
l initial ground
disturbing/vegetation cl
earing activities.
 No endangered/threatened species shall be
captured and relocated without express
permission from the CDFW and/or USFWS.
 If at any time during construction an
endangered, threatened, or fully protected
species enters the construction site or
otherwise may be impacted, all construction
activities shall cease. A CDFW/USFWS-
approved biologist shall document the
occurrence and consult with the CDFW and
USFWS, as appropriate, to determine
whether it was safe for project activities to
resume.
 At the end of each workday, excavations
shall be secured with cover or a ramp
provided to prevent wildlife entrapment.
 All trenches, pipes, culverts or similar
structures shall be inspected for animals
prior to burying, capping, moving, or filling.
 If night work is required, all construction
lighting shall be pointed down and directed
only on the work area.
 The City shall approve one or more qualified
biologists to oversee and monitor biological
compliance for the project. At least one
qualified biologist shall be present during all
initial ground disturbing activities, including
vegetation removal to recover special status
animal species unearthed by construction
activities.

ATTACHMENT 5
37 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

24 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
BIO-1(f)
: Pre-Construction Nesting Birds Surveys
All projects developed under the AHO shall
implement the following. Project activity shall
restrict ground disturbance, building demolition,
and vegetation removal activities to the non-
breeding season (September 16 to January 31)
when feasible. For ground disturbance, building
demolition, and vegetation removal activities
that must be conducted during the bird nesting
season (February 1 to September 15), general
pre-construction nesting bird surveys shall be
conducted by a qualified biologist, including for,
but not limited to, the tricolored blackbird and
White-tailed kite, not more than 14 days prior to
construction activities involving ground clearing,
vegetation removal/trimming, or building
demolition. The surveys shall include the
disturbance area plus a 200-foot buffer around
the site if feasible, and a 500-foot buffer for
tricolored blackbird and White-tailed kite. If
active nests are located, an appropriate
avoidance buffer shall be established within
which no work activity shall be allowed which
would impact these nests. The avoidance buffer
would be established by the qualified biologist
on a case-by-case basis based on the species and
site conditions. In no cases shall the buffer be
smaller than 50 feet for non-raptor bird species,
200 feet for raptor species, or a 500-foot buffer
for White-tailed kite. Larger buffers may be
required depending upon the status of the nest
and the construction activities occurring in the
vicinity of the nest. If fully protected White-
tailed kites are documented nesting within 500
feet of construction activities, CDFW shall be
consulted on appropriate avoidance and
minimization methods. The buffer area(s) shall
When feasible, conduct ground
disturbing activities and vegetation
removal during the non-breeding
season for nesting birds; for ground
disturbance and vegetation removal
occurring during the bird nesting
season, conduct general pre-
construction nesting bird surveys,
including subsequent reassessments,
buffer implementation, and CDFW
consultation, as required
Not more than
14 days prior to
construction
activity
commencing
during the
breeding season
Once prior to
start of
construction,
with additional
surveys in areas
where no
construction
activity has
occurred for 14
or more days
City of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
qualified
biologist

ATTACHMENT 5
38 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 25
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
be closed to a
ll construction personnel and
equipment unti
l juveniles have fledged and the
nest is inactive. City-approved Biologist shall
confirm that breeding/nesting is completed and
young have fledged the nest prior to removal of
the buffer.

BIO-1(g): Worker E
nvironmental Awareness Program (WEAP)
All projects developed under the AHO shall
implement the following. Prior to initiation of
construction activities (including staging and
mobilization), the project proponent shall
arrange for all personnel associated with project
construction for the applicable phase to attend
WEAP training, conducted by a City-approved
biologist, to aid workers in recognizing special
status resources that may occur in the
construction area. The specifics of this program
shall include identification of the sensitive
species and habitats, a description of the
regulatory status and general ecological
characteristics of sensitive resources, and review
of the limits of construction and mitigation
measures required to reduce impacts to
biological resources within the work area. A fact
sheet conveying this information shall also be
prepared for distribution to all contractors, their
employers, and other personnel involved with
construction. All employees shall sign a form
provided by the trainer indicating they have
attended the WEAP and understand the
information presented to them. The form shall
be submitted to the City to document
compliance.

Provide WEAP training for
construction personnel
Prior to
construction
As needed
during
construction
(may be
repeated to
ensure all
construction
personnel
review WEAP
training prior to
any site work)
City of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
qualified
biologist

ATTACHMENT 5
39 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

26 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
BIO-2:

Jurisdictional Delineation
If a propo
sed project under the AHO would
impact any of the ephemeral drainages and/or
the ponds (as shown Figure 5), a qualified
biologist shall complete a jurisdictional
delineation. The jurisdictional delineation will
determine the extent of the jurisdiction for
CDFW, USACE, and/or RWQCB, and shall be
conducted in accordance with the requirement
set forth by each agency. The result will be a
preliminary jurisdictional delineation report that
shall be submitted to the City, USACE, RWQCB,
and CDFW, as appropriate, for review and
approval. Jurisdictional areas shall be avoided to
the maximum extent possible. If jurisdictional
areas are expected to be impacted, then the
RWQCB would require a Waste Discharge
Requirements (WDRs) permit and/or Section
401 Water Quality Certification (depending upon
whether or not the feature falls under federal
jurisdiction). If CDFW asserts its jurisdictional
authority, then a Streambed Alteration
Agreement pursuant to Section 1600 et seq. of
the CFGC would also be required prior to
construction within the areas of CDFW
jurisdiction. If the USACE asserts its authority,
then a permit pursuant to Section 404 of the
CWA would be required. Furthermore, a
compensatory mitigation program, and the
measures set forth by the regulatory agencies
during the permitting process, shall be
implemented. Compensatory mitigation for all
permanent impacts to waters of the U.S. and
waters of the state shall be completed at a ratio
as required in applicable permits, but shall not
be less than a minimum ratio of 1:1. All
temporary impacts to waters of the U.S. and
Complete a jurisdictional delineation
for projects under the AGO that
would impact ephemeral drainages
and/or the ponds. Submit report to
the City, USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW,
as appropriate, for review and
approval.

Prior to
construction
Once City of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
qualified
wetlands
biologist

ATTACHMENT 5
40 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 27
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
waters of t
he state shall be fully restored to
natural conditio
n.

Cultural
Resources
CR
-1: Site Specific Historical Resources Assessment Report Any project invo
lving partial or full demolition of
a property 45 years of age and older that has
not been subject to a previous evaluation or
survey at the time of project review shall require
preparation of a Site-Specific Historical
Resources Assessment. The Site-Specific
Historical Resources Assessment Reports shall:
 Follow the practices established by the
California Office of Historic Preservation for
intensive-level evaluation and be carried out
by a preservation professional meeting the
Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications Standards for Architectural
History or History as defined by the National
Park Service and codified in 36 Code of
Federal Regulations 61;
 Include a construction chronology of each
property and brief discussion of any known
design professionals/architects associated
with the property’s design and construction;
 Consider all applicable aspects of
architectural, historic, and sociocultural
history, through a thematic historic context
section, and apply federal, state, and local
criteria of significance to ascertain and
confirm historical resource status; and
 Identify and document character-defining
features, including of the site and setting, for
those properties qualifying as historical
resources pursuant to CEQA (i.e., designated
or eligible federal, state, or local landmarks
or districts).

Prepare a Site-Specific Historical
Resources Assessment, as needed.

Prior to permit
issuance
Once City of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
preservation
professional
meeting the
standards
described in
the measure

ATTACHMENT 5
41 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

28 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
If the prop
erty is found ineligible for the CRHR or
NRHP it s
hall be considered non-historical for
the purposes of CEQA and no additional review
or mitigation is required. If the property is
identified as historical, Mitigation Measure CR-2
shall apply.

CR
-2: Treatment of Historical Resources
If historical resources ar
e identified through the
survey and evaluation performed pursuant to
Mitigation Measure CR-1, the relocation,
rehabilitation, or alteration of the resource
under the proposed project shall be consistent
with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for
the Treatments of Historic Properties
(Standards). A report identifying and specifying
the treatment of character-defining features and
construction activities shall be provided,
demonstrating how the project complies with
the Standards and avoids the substantial
adverse change in the significance of the
historical resource as defined by CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5(b). The report shall
be prepared by an architectural historian or
historical architect meeting the PQS as defined
by 36 CF Part 61 and provided to the City for
review and concurrence prior to project
approval.

Relocate, rehabilitate, or alter the
resource consistent with the
Standards for the Treatment of
Historic Properties.

Prior to permit
issuance
Once City of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
qualified
architectural
historian or
historical
architect

Prepare historical resource treatment
report
Prior to permit
issuance
Once
ATTACHMENT 5
42 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 29
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
CR
-4: Archaeological Resources Investigation
At the time o
f application for land use permits
that involve grading, trenching, or other ground
disturbance in native soil with the potential for
encountering unknown archaeological
resources, the project applicant shall retain a
qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of
the Interior standards in archaeology to
complete a Phase 1 cultural resources
assessment of the development site. A Phase 1
cultural resources assessment shall include an
archaeological pedestrian survey of the
development site, if possible, and sufficient
background archival research and field sampling
to determine whether subsurface prehistoric or
historic remains may be present. Archival
research shall include a current (no more than
one-year old) records search from the NWIC and
a SLF search conducted with the NAHC.

Identified prehistoric or historic archaeological
remains shall be avoided and preserved in place
where feasible. Where preservation is not
feasible, the significance of each resource shall
be evaluated for significance and eligibility for
listing in the CRHR through a Phase 2 evaluation.

A Phase 2 evaluation shall include any necessary
archival research to identify significant historical
associations as well as mapping of surface
artifacts, collection of functionally or temporally
diagnostic tools and debris, and excavation of a
sample of the cultural deposit to characterize
the nature of the sites, define the artifact and
feature contents, determine horizontal
boundaries and depth below surface, and
retrieve representative samples of artifacts and
other remains.

Prepare Phase 1 cultural resources
assessment of the development site
Prior to permit
issuance
Once City of Marina
Community
Development
Department.

Qualified
archaeologist

Avoid or preserve prehistoric or
historic archaeological remains in
place where feasible
During
construction
As needed
If avoid
ance or preservation is not
feasible, prepare Phase 2 cultural
resources assessment
Prior to permit
issuance
As needed
Collect cultural m
aterials from the site
and prepare technical report
During
construction
As needed
Incorporate all feasible
recomm
endations for reduction of
archaeological impacts into project
design if the resources meet CRHR
significance standards
Prior to permit
issuance
As needed
Submit cultural resource
ass
essment(s) to the City
Prior to permit
issuance
Once
ATTACHMENT 5
43 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

30 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
Cultural materials colle
cted from the sites shall
be process
ed and analyzed in the laboratory
according to standard archaeological
procedures. The age of the materials shall be
determined using radiocarbon dating and/or
other appropriate procedures; lithic artifacts,
faunal remains, and other cultural materials
shall be identified and analyzed according to
current professional standards. The significance
of the sites shall be evaluated according to the
criteria of the CRHR. The results of the
investigations shall be presented in a technical
report following the standards of the California
Office of Historic Preservation publication
“Archaeological Resource Management Reports:

Recommended Content and Format (1990 or
latest edition)”
(http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1054/files/armr.
pdf). Upon completion of the work, all artifacts,
other cultural remains, records, photographs,
and other documentation shall be curated an
appropriate curation facility. All fieldwork,
analysis, report production, and curation shall
be fully funded by the applicant.

If the resources meet CRHR significance
standards, the City shall ensure that all feasible
recommendations for reduction of
archaeological impacts are incorporated into the
final design and permits issued for development.

If necessary, Phase 3 data recovery excavation,
conducted to exhaust the data potential of
significant archaeological sites, shall be carried
out by a qualified archaeologist meeting the
Secretary of the Interior’s standards for
archaeology according to a research design
reviewed and approved by the City prepared in
advance of fieldwork and using appropriate
ATTACHMENT 5
44 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 31
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
archaeolog
ical field and laboratory methods
consistent with the California Off
ice of Historic
Preservation Planning Bulletin 5 (1991),
Guidelines for Archaeological Research Design,
or the latest edition thereof.

As applicable, the final Phase 1 Inventory, Phase
2 Testing and Evaluation, and/or Phase 3 Data
Recovery reports shall be submitted to the City
prior to issuance of construction permit.

Recommendations contained therein shall be
implemented throughout all ground disturbance
activities.

Geology and Soils

GEO-1:

Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation
The City of Marina shall require the following
specific requirements for individual AHO
projects that would require excavation
exceeding five feet:

Prio
r to excavations exceeding five feet, a
qualified professional paleontologist shall be
retained to direct all mitigation measures
related to paleontological resources. A
qualified professional paleontologist is
defined by the SVP standards as an
individual preferably with an M.S. or Ph.D. in
paleontology or geology who is experienced
with paleontological procedures and
techniques, who is knowledgeable in the
geology of California, and who has worked
as a paleontological mitigation project
supervisor for a least two years (SVP 2010).

The q
ualified professional paleontologist
shall design a Paleontological Resources
Develop a paleontological resources
mitigation plan for areas where
ground disturbance will exceed five
feet below ground surface.

Prior to
commencement
of ground
disturbing
activities
exceeding ten
feet below
ground surface
Once City of Marina
Community
Development
Department ,
qualified
professional
paleontologist

Conduct paleontological WEAP
program
As needed
during
construction
(may be
repeated to
ensure all
construction
personnel
review WEAP
training prior to
any site work)
Once for each
construction
group working in
areas where
ground
disturbance
would exceed
ten feet below
ground surface
ATTACHMENT 5
45 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

32 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
Mitig
ation and Monitoring Prog
ram
(PRMMP)
for the project, which outlines the
procedures and protocol for conducting
paleontological monitoring and mitigation.

Monitoring shall be conducted by a qualified
paleontological monitor who meets the
minimum qualifications per standards set
forth by the SVP. The PRMMP shall address
the following procedures and protocols:
 Timing and duration of monitoring
 Procedures for work stoppage and fossil
collection
 The type and extent of data that should
be collected with any recovered fossils
 Identify an appropriate curatorial
institution
 Identify the minimum qualifications for
qualified paleontologists and
paleontological monitors
 Identify the conditions under which
modifications to the monitoring schedule
can be implemented
 Details to be included in the final
monitoring report.

Prio
r to the start of construction, the
qualified paleontologist or his or her
designee shall conduct a paleontological
Worker Environmental Awareness Program
(WEAP) training for construction personnel
regarding the appearance of fossils and the
procedures for notifying paleontological
staff should fossils be discovered by
construction staff.

Full
-time paleontological monitoring shall be
conducted during ground disturbing
construction activities (i.e., grading,
Conduct paleontological monitoring During
excavation and
grading with a
depth of five or
more feet
As needed
during
construction
Evaluate, recover, and/or salvage
fossil if determined it may be
significant
As needed
during
construction
As needed
during
construction
ATTACHMENT 5
46 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 33
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
trench
ing, foundation work) exceeding five
feet, pursuant to the PRMM
P.

Paleontological monitoring is not required
for any construction activities that do not
exceed depths of less than five feet. If the
qualified paleontologist determines that full-
time monitoring is no longer warranted,
based on the specific geologic conditions at
the surface or at depth, he/she may
recommend that monitoring be reduced to
periodic spot-checking or cease entirely.

In the event of a f
ossil discovery by the
paleontological monitor or construction
personnel, all work in the immediate vicinity
of the find shall cease. The qualified
paleontologist shall evaluate the find before
restarting construction activity in the area. If
it is determined that the fossil(s) is (are)
scientifically significant, the qualified
paleontologist shall complete the following
conditions to mitigate impacts to significant
fossil resources:
a. The paleontological monitor shall
evaluate the discovery and determine if
the fossil may be considered significant.

If the fossils are determined to be
potentially significant, the qualified
paleontologist shall recover them
following standard field procedures for
collecting paleontological as outlined in
the PRMMP. If fossils are discovered, the
qualified paleontologist shall recover
them as specified in the project’s
PRMMP.
b. Once salvaged, significant fossils shall be
prepared to a curation-ready condition,
and curated in a scientific institution
ATTACHMENT 5
47 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

34 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
with a permanen
t paleontological
collectio
n.
c. Upon completion of ground disturbing
activity (and curation of fossils if
necessary) the qualified paleontologist
should prepare a final mitigation and
monitoring report outlining the results of
the mitigation and monitoring program.

The report shall be submitted to the City
of Marina.

Hazards and Hazardous Materi
als
HAZ-1:

Project-Level Hazardous Materials Assessment
Prio
r to the obtaining grading permits or starting
other ground disturbing work for individual
projects, the City shall hire a qualified
environmental professional to conduct a Phase I
environmental assessment (ESA), consistent
with the American Society for Testing Materials
standards (ASTM E1527). The Phase I ESA shall
evaluate the likelihood that hazardous chemicals
are present and whether soil sampling is
necessary. If the Phase I ESA indicates that
contamination is unlikely, no further mitigation
is necessary other than any recommendations
identified in the Phase I ESA (such as stopping
work if stained soil is encountered).

If the Phase I ESA indicates that additional soil
sampling or other further evaluation is
necessary, the City shall hire a qualified
environmental professional to conduct a Phase II
ESA to determine the presence and extent of
contamination. If the results indicate that
contamination exists at levels above regulatory
action standards, then the site shall be
remediated in accordance with
recommendations made by applicable
Conduct a Phase I ESA as described in
the measure. If needed, conduct a
Phase II ESA.

Prior to the
obtaining
grading permits
or starting other
ground
disturbing work
for individual
projects
Once City of Marina
Community
Development
Department,
qualified
environmenta
l professional

If needed, remediate the site in
accordance with recommendations
made by applicable regulatory
agencies, including RWQCB and DTSC.

Prior to project
construction
As needed
ATTACHMENT 5
48 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 35
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
regulatory agenc
ies, including RWQCB and DTSC.

The ag
encies involved shall depend on the type
and extent of contamination. If remediation is
necessary, the City shall hire a qualified
environmental professional prior to obtaining
grading permits or ground disturbance to
prepare a work plan that identifies necessary
remediation activities, including excavation and
removal of on-site contaminated soils,
appropriate dust control measures, and
redistribution of clean fill material on the project
sites. The plan shall include measures that
ensure the safe transport, use, and disposal of
contaminated soil removed from the site. The
plan shall also identify when and where soil
disturbing construction activities may safely
commence.

Noise
NOI-1:

Construction Noise Reduction Measures
The fol
lowing measures shall be implemented if
construction is to occur within 500 feet of a
residential property line:
 Notes for grading plans and/or site
improvement plans shall clearly state the
noise limitation requirements of Municipal
Code Section 15.04.055.
 Construction activities shall occur as to not
exceed the 60 dBA LEQ noise limit at a

receiving property line. Measures to reduce
noise levels below the 60 dBA LEQ noi
se limit
include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Mufflers. During project site excavation
and grading, construction equipment,
fixed or mobile, shall be operated with
closed engine doors and shall be
equipped with properly operating and
Include noise limitation requirements
on grading and/or site improvement
plans.

Prior to permit
issuance
Once City of Marina
Community
Development
Department

Implement construction noise
reduction measures, as described in
the measure
During
construction
As needed
during
construction
ATTACHMENT 5
49 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

36 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
maintaine
d mufflers consistent with
manufactur
ers’ standards.
b. Stationary Equipment. Stationary
construction equipment shall be located
and oriented so that emitted noise is
directed away from the nearest noise
sensitive receivers.
c. Equipment Staging Areas. Equipment
staging shall be located in areas that will
create the greatest distance feasible
between construction-related noise
sources and noise sensitive receivers.
d. Electrically-Powered Tools and
Facilities. Where available, electrical
power shall be used to run air
compressors and similar power tools and
to power any temporary structures, such
as construction trailers or caretaker
facilities.
e. Sound Barriers. Temporary noise
barriers shall be implemented between
the construction equipment and the
receiving property lines. The noise
barriers shall be constructed of material
with a minimum weight of two pounds
per square foot with no gaps or
perforations. Noise barriers may be
constructed of, but not limited to, 5/8-
inch plywood, 5/8-inch oriented strand
board, and hay bales. Noise barriers may
consist of sound blankets affixed to
construction fencing along the
construction site boundary facing
potentially sensitive receivers
ATTACHMENT 5
50 Mitig
ation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Final Init
ial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 37
Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
Idling. Construction
vehicles shall be
prohibited
from idling in excess of five
minutes.

NOI-2:

HVAC Mechanical Equipment Shielding
Concurrent with Design Revie
w and prior to the
approval of building permits, the applicant shall
provide a design plan demonstrating to the
satisfaction of the Development Services
Director (or their designee) that the noise level
from operation of mechanical equipment shall
not cumulatively exceed the following noise
level limits for a designated receiving land use
category as specified in Table 4.2 in the Marina
General Plan:
 From 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.:
a. 50 dBA Leq
b. 70 dBA Lmax
c. 65 dBA Lmax, impul
sive
 From 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.:
a. s45 dBA L
eq
b. 65 dBA Lmax
c. 60 dBA Lmax, impul
sive
Noise control measures may include, but are not
limited to, the selection of quiet equipment,
equipment setbacks, parapet walls, silencers,
and/or acoustical louvers. Noise attenuation
features shall be implemented that would
reduce sound levels to allowable noise levels.

Provide a design plan demonstrating
that the noise level from operation of
mechanical equipment shall not
cumulatively exceed the noise limits
described in the measure.

Concurrent with
Design Review
and prior to the
approval of
building permits
Once City of Marina
Community
Development
Department

ATTACHMENT 5
51 City of
Marina
City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

38 Mitigatio
n Measure/
Condi
tion of Approval Actio
n Required Timing
Monitoring
Freque
ncy
Respons
ible
Agency
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Initial
Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Date

Com
-
pliance

Veri
fi-
catio
n
Comment
s
Tribal Cultural Resources

TCR-1:

Suspension of Work Around Tribal Cultural Resources
In the event that
cultural resources of Native
American origin are identified during
construction of AHO sites, all earth-disturbing
work in the vicinity of the find shall be
temporarily suspended or redirected until an
archaeologist has evaluated the nature and
significance of the find as a cultural resource in
accordance with Mitigation Measure CR-2 and
an appropriate local Native American
representative is consulted. If the City, in
consultation with local Native Americans,
determines that the resource is a tribal cultural
resource and thus significant under CEQA, a
mitigation plan shall be prepared and
implemented in accordance with state
guidelines and in consultation with local Native
American group(s). The plan shall include
avoidance of the resource or, if avoidance of the
resource is infeasible, shall outline the
appropriate treatment of the resource in
coordination with the appropriate local Native
American tribal representative and, if applicable,
a qualified archaeologist. Examples of
appropriate mitigation for tribal cultural
resources include, but are not limited to,
protecting the cultural character and integrity of
the resource, protecting traditional use of the
resource, protecting the confidentiality of the
resource, or heritage recovery.

All earth-disturbing work in the
vicinity of the find shall be
temporarily suspended or redirected
until an archaeologist has evaluated
the nature and significance of the find
as a cultural resource in accordance
with Mitigation Measure CR-2 and an
appropriate local Native American
representative is consulted.

Upon discovery
of a resource
during
construction
Once for each
discovery
City of Marina
Community
Development
Department

If the resource is a tribal cultural
resource, prepare and implement a
mitigation plan as described in the
measure.

Prior to
restarting
construction
Once, for each
identified tribal
cultural resource

ATTACHMENT 5
52 Response to Comments
Overlay Final IS-MND
City of Marina Affordable Housing
ATTACHMENT 6
53 City of Marina
City of M
arina Affordable Housing Overlay

2 This sec
tion includes comments received during the circulation of the Draft IS-MND prepared for the City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay Project.

The Draft IS-MND was circulated for a 30-day public review period that began on September 26, 2022 and ended on October 26, 2022. The City of Marina received one comment letter on the Draft IS-MND. The comment letter and the response to this comment letter are included below.

Respon
ses to Comments on the Draft IS- MND
ATTACHMENT 6
54 1
Kayleigh Limbach
From: Ashley Quackenbush
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2022 2:06 PM
To: Kayleigh Limbach
Subject: FW: [EXT] FW: Marina AHO
From: Gabriel Sanders <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 1:08 PM
To: Guido Persicone <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael DeLapa <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Marina AHO

[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello Guido,

Thank you for sharing the AHO document. We do have a few questions:
 It's our understanding that the AHO is meant to allow Marina to meet its remaining 5th Cycle RHNA – are those remaining 5th cycle units counted separately from the 685 for the 6th cycle?  Has any developer during the 5th cycle taken advantage of Marina's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance? If so, where and who's done the building?
 Does the AHO allow for in-lieu fees or off-site affordable units? The City's Inclusionary Ordinance appears to allow for site location variance ("land dedication") but I don't see any mention of in-lieu fees in the city code.  Is Marina planning to use the same AHO system in the 6th cycle, and will you expand AHO areas subject to ministerial permitting?
 What determined that some of the AHO sites should have densities ranging from 30-50 du/acre and others 30- 35 du/acre?
Grateful for your engagement on this. Please let me know if you'd like to schedule a zoom call to discuss this further.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:59 AM Guido Persicone <[email protected]> wrote:

Here ya go. Please let me know if you have questions or comments:

https://www.cityofmarina.org/DocumentCenter/View/12920/Marina-Affordable-Housing-Overlay-IS-MND-Draft-9-9- 2022?bidId=

Guido

Letter 1

1.1 ATTACHMENT 6
55 City of Marina

City of Marina Affordable Housing Overlay

4 Le
tter 1
COMM
ENTER: Gabriel Sanders, Deputy Director of LandWatch Monterey County DATE: October 14, 2022
The comment does not pertain to the analysis of the Draft IS-MND, and therefore no revisions to the Draft IS-MND are required. However, for the purposes of providing this information to the public the following answers are provided.

The commenter requested information regarding the City’s ability to meet its 5 th Cycle an
d 6th Cycle

Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) under the provisions of the AHO. The commenter also asks whether the AHO will be used for the 6th Cycl
e and if additional overlay sites will be added
during the next Housing Element period. The 5th and
6th Cycle
obligations are, in fact, different and
the AHO is designed to meet shortfalls from the 4th and 5th Cycles.

While the AHO is not expected to
be applied to additional sites for the 6th Cycle
, it may be used as a tool to advance affordable
housing opportunities by the City in the future.

The commenter asks clarifying questions with regard to in-lieu fees or off-site development of affordable housing. The AHO is an option for developers and property owners, not a requirement. A developer may opt to follow the provisions of the base zoning or elect to take advantage of the density allowances and streamlining under the AHO. As such, all development under the AHO must be done on the parcel with the AHO designation and cannot be done off-site nor via an in-lieu fee.

The commenter requests information about use of the inclusionary housing ordinance. The inclusionary housing ordinance is a separate ordinance from the AHO that similarly supports the development of affordable housing; however, they are different. The inclusionary housing ordinance requires affordable units when a certain number of housing units in a project are proposed. Uniquely, the AHO may only be used if a certain percentage of affordable housing units are proposed.

Finally, the commenter inquiries about how the density ranges in the overlay were determined.

Densities identified in the Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan, which is a separate planning document guiding downtown development, have been evaluated by the community through a separate public outreach process. These densities are reflected in the AHO.

ATTACHMENT 6
56 1
Summary of the September 8, 2022 Planning Commission Questions Wh
y these sites for the affordable housing overlay (AHO)? The sites are largely determined by the State HCD requirements for housing element opportunity sites in that they are more than .5 acre and less than 20 acres, near transit and suitable for development. Please see the State HCD website for the full details.

Do
es this policy mandate compliance by property owners?
No. This is a voluntary policy to help the City demonstrate it has adequate capacity to meet its regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) from previous housing element cycles.

Th
is is only specific to the downtown area?
For now, this is limited to the downtown area, but once adopted can be used city wide.

Ho
w many acres are represented by the 23 sites just to get the feel for the size of the housing? The total number of acreages is approximately 21 acres. The density proposed for these sites are consistent with the draft Downtown Plan and the level of density traditionally developed by Marina.

Ho
w can we ensure the project that use the affordable housing overlay policy are integrated into the Marina community?
If the City is implementing the best management practices of urban planning a community member should not be able to tell the difference between an affordable unit and a market rate unit. The affordable housing sites should be spread out throughout the downtown area. This also supports the City’s requirement to affirm fair housing in the greater Marina area. Additionally, by Fall of 2023 the City will have adopted objective zoning standards which will give clear guidance to market rate and affordable projects the look and feel the City wants moving forward for projects.

Pl
ease comment on the parking situation within the Downtown Area As part of our reaching out to our community we did hear that form the community and we come back on December 8th to the commission. We are doing a very limited parking analysis of the downtown. The findings of this study prepared by Kimley Horn are that there is adequate capacity for the proposed uses in the downtown at this time.

Th
e draft downtown plan was written so that housing was above commercial on the first floor. Does the AHO policy conflict with this?
No. The policy kicks in once you do 12% low or 15% very low-income units which can be incorporated into a residential or mixed-use project. The policy was written to be consistent with the Downtown Plan.

The
Commission was concerned about the lack of objective standards in the draft policy.

City staff working with the consultant have increased the objective standards within the policy. Additionally objective standards will also be included in the Downtown Specific Plan.

ATTACHMENT 7
57 1
Marina Downtown Vitalization
Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
Draft Report
Oct
ober 2022
Prepared for
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, CA 93933
Prepared by
10 South Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1250
San Jose, CA 95113
ATTACHMENT 8
58 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 3

2. Project Description .................................................................................................................................... 4 Land Use Program ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Land Use Scenarios ................................................................................................................................... 4 Existing Parking Supply ............................................................................................................................. 5 Future Transportation and Infrastructure Improvements ........................................................................ 5 City Parking Requirements ........................................................................................................................ 6

3. Marina Parking Field Data Collection ........................................................................................................ 7

4. Shared Parking Analysis Methodology ...................................................................................................... 8 Parking Rates ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Parking Reduction Methodologies ............................................................................................................ 8 Shared Parking Analysis Results .............................................................................................................. 10

5. Parking Demand with ULI 3rd Edition Rates ............................................................................................ 12

6. Parking Demand with ITE 5th Edition Rates ............................................................................................. 15

7. Parking Demand with Marina Field Data and ITE 5th Edition Rates ........................................................ 17

8. Parking Results and Recommendations .................................................................................................. 19 Shared Parking Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 19 Potential Parking Management Strategies ............................................................................................. 23 Affordable Housing and Assembly Bill 2097 ........................................................................................... 24

9. References .............................................................................................................................................. 26

10. Appendix ............................................................................................................................................... 26

TABLES

Table 1 – DVSP Land Use Program ................................................................................................................ 5 Table 2 –Existing Parking Supply in Specific Plan Area ................................................................................. 5 Table 3 –Marina Municipal Code Parking Requirements ............................................................................. 6 Table 4 – Marina Parking Occupancy Survey Results ................................................................................... 7 Table 5 – Estimated DVSP Mode-Share Parking Reduction per CAPCOA 2021 .......................................... 11 Table 6 – ULI Parking Rate Summary .......................................................................................................... 13 Table 7 – ITE Parking Rate Summary .......................................................................................................... 16 Table 8 – Marina and ITE Parking Rate Summary (Comparison) ................................................................ 18 Table 9 – DVSP Recommended Shared Peak Parking Demand .................................................................. 20 Table 10 – DVSP Shared Peak Parking Demand Summary.......................................................................... 21 Table 11 – DVSP Adjusted Peak Parking Demand Rate Summary .............................................................. 22 Table 12 – DVSP Shared Peak Parking Demand with Affordable Housing & AB 2097 (Comparison) ......... 25

FIGURES

Figure 1 – DVSP Overview Map .................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2 – MST Transit Stop Locations in Downtown Marina ..................................................................... 24

ATTACHMENT 8
59 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
3 1. Introduction
This te
chnical report presents the methodologies and findings of a shared parking analysis for the office, retail, and residential land uses proposed in the City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan (DVSP). The DVSP, published in 2019, is a community-initiated plan intended to guide the future development and ultimate transformation of the City’s 320-acre downtown and proposes to construct up to 2,400 additional residential units and between 530,000 to 1,380,000 additional square feet of retail and office space. Kimley-Horn was retained by the City to identify the estimated vehicle parking demand and recommend strategies and policies to manage parking from future buildout of the DVSP.

A summa
ry of the shared peak parking demand (number of vehicle spaces) and the adjusted peak parking demand rate (space per LU) from various industry standards, parking methodologies, and land use scenarios was prepared to compare against the parking supply ratios derived from the City’s Municipal Code requirements. A detailed description of the assumptions and empirical data for each parking analysis estimate is provided in the following sections.

Fi
gure 1 provides an overview map of the DVSP boundary and location of the Core, Multifamily, and Transition districts in the City of Marina.

Figure 1 – DVSP Overview Map
ATTACHMENT 8
60 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
4 2. Project Description

Land Use Program
The Downtown district of Marina encompasses approximately 320-acres and is generally bounded:

• On the north by the parcels along Reservation Road
• On the south by the parcels along Reindollar Avenue, Sunset Avenue, Carmel Avenue, and Crescent Avenue
• On the east by Salinas Avenue
• On the west by the parcels along the west side of Del Monte Boulevard

The DVSP establishes three (3) primary zones within downtown to guide the density and intensity of the proposed land uses consistent with the City’s General Plan. These zones include the Core, Multifamily, and Transition district.

Core Zone
The Core zone would consist of higher densities in commercial and mixed-use developments and become a vital economic center served by multi-modal transportation. Transit-oriented development would be featured by the Monterey Salinas Transit (MST) Center and MST Bus Rapid Transit SURF projects. In addition, vehicle parking would be located behind buildings and shared parking agreements between the mixed uses are encouraged.

Multifamily
The Multifamily zone would consist of residential developments up to three stories high at a maximum density of 35 units per acre. A portion of the residential units in this zone would provide affordable housing to support the businesses in downtown.

Transition
The Transition zone would consist of commercial, mixed-use, and residential developments at about half the density of projects in the Core district and serves as a connection between the Core and lower density uses in other parts of the City. This zone encompasses two mixed-use nodes and would enhance two prominent gateways into the City at the east end of Reservation Road and at south end by Highway 1 / Del Monte Boulevard.

Land Use Scenarios
Table 1 provides a breakdown of the 2018 existing land uses and the buildout land use program in the DVSP. A minimum and a maximum buildout scenario was assumed for the parking analysis since the DVSP anticipates a range of expected development in each downtown district.

The following study scenarios for parking analysis comparison are prepared in this technical report:

• Scenario A – Existing Land Uses
• Scenario B – DVSP Minimum Buildout
• Scenario C – DVSP Maximum Buildout

ATTACHMENT 8
61 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
5 Table 1 – DVSP Land Use Program

Existing Parking Supply
A parking inventory of the Specific Plan area was conducted by City staff in 2018, and a total of 7,990 parking spaces is available. The existing vehicle parking supply breakdown is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 –Existing Parking Supply in Specific Plan Area
Parking Location Parking Supply
(# Spaces)
Percent of
Total
Off-street in private lots 6,144 77%
Off-street in public lots 276 3%
On-street 1,570 20%
Total Existing Parking 7,990 100%

Future Transportation and Infrastructure Improvements
It is assumed that future development in the DVSP will implement various infrastructure improvements and transportation demand management (TDM) measures to encourage alternative transportation (such as walking, biking, carpool, transit) and reduce single occupancy vehicle trips to and from the downtown area. By implementing these improvements, the increase in transportation mode share and reduction of vehicle trips will also reduce the overall vehicle parking demand for the Specific Plan.

Municipal Code Chapter 18 Transportation Management establishes the City’s policy to relieve traffic congestion and air pollution consistent with the adopted congestion management plan for Monterey County. Under this policy, new applicable developments in the City would be responsible for implementing a TDM program to encourage increased participation in alternative transportation modes such as walking, biking, rideshare, or using public transit.

A B C
Existing
Uses
DVSP
Minimum
Buildout
DVSP
Maximum
Buildout
Office KSF 36.59 145.93 262.67
Retail KSF 375.28 583.70 1050.67
Residential DU 286.00 1497.00 1658.00
Office KSF 0.00 0.00 0.00
Retail KSF 0.00 0.00 0.00
Residential DU 1638.00 1618.00 1792.00
Office KSF 277.47 421.44 561.91
Retail KSF 316.43 386.78 515.71
Residential DU 377.00 1586.00 1755.00
Office KSF 314.05 567.36 824.58
Retail KSF 691.71 970.48 1566.37
Residential DU 2301.00 4701.00 5205.00
DVSP District
Land Use Scenario
Core
Multifamily
Residential
Land Use Type UnitTotal
Acres
Transition
Total DVSP

56.42 106.66
104.00
267.08
ATTACHMENT 8
62 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
6 The proposed TDM measures and infrastructure improvements for the Specific Plan area have not been finalized at this time; however, a discussion of the assumed mode-share and internal capture reductions for the shared parking analysis is provided in Section 4.

City Parking Requirements
Municipal Code Chapter 17.44 Parking Requirements establishes the minimum off-street parking needs for various land uses in the City of Marina. Table 3 shows a summary of the applicable parking requirements at peak demand and the total parking spaces needed for the DVSP buildout scenarios based on the City’s parking standards for individual land uses.

Table 3 –Marina Municipal Code Parking Requirements

Per the City’s Municipal Code, a total of 5,863 parking spaces is required for the existing land use scenario in the Specific Plan area. For the DVSP minimum buildout scenario, the required parking would be approximately 10,121 spaces while the DVSP maximum buildout scenario would require about 13,650 parking spaces.

The current parking supply of 7,990 spaces in the Specific Plan area satisfies the minimum parking requirement for the existing land uses (Land Use Scenario A). The total estimated parking supply for the DVSP buildout (Land Use Scenario B & C) is unknown at this time since redevelopment of the area with higher land use densities will impact the current parking supply and where future parking spaces are located.

A B C A B C
Existing
Uses
DVSP
Minimum
Bu
ildout
DVSP
Maximum
Bu
ildout
Existing
Uses
DVSP
Minimum
Bu
ildout
DVSP
Maximum
Bu
ildout
Office 17.44.030-C 1 pe r 300 SQFT 314,053 567,362 824,581 1,047 1,891 2,749 Retail 17.44.030-F 1 pe r 275 SQFT 691,705 970,484 1,566,374 2,515 3,529 5,696 Residential 17.44.030-K 1 pe r 1 DU 2,301 4,701 5,205 2,301 4,701 5,205 5,863 10,121 13,650
7,990 N/A N/A
Required Parking (# spaces)
Estimated Parking Supply in Downtown Specific Plan Area Total Required Parking Supply Per Municipal Code
Municipal
Code
Parking
Code
(s
pace/unit)
Land Use
Type Unit
Land Use Scenario
ATTACHMENT 8
63 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
7 3. Marina Parking Field Data Collection

A parking occupancy survey was conducted in the field to estimate the current retail parking rates in the Marina downtown area. Parking occupancy surveys were collected on Tuesday September 27, 2022, when school was in session and during favorable weather conditions, at the following retail locations:

• Marina Square Shopping Center (250 Reservation Road, Northside) • Seacrest Plaza Shopping Center (250 Reservation Road, Southside)

An estimate of the shopping center land use size and the on-site parking supply was collected in the field to determine a parking rate during the mid-day and PM peak hours which are when retail activity is traditionally the busiest. The estimated parking occupancy and parking rate by time of day is summarized in Table 4 and the Appendix.

Table 4 – Marina Parking Occupancy Survey Results

At the Marina Square shopping center, the peak activity occurs at 12 PM and the parking occupancy is 45% with an estimated retail parking rate of 1.55 spaces per 1,000 square feet (KSF). For the Seacrest Plaza, the peak activity occurs at 5 PM and the parking occupancy is 37% with an estimated retail parking rate of 1.36 spaces per KSF.

Compared to the national average shopping center parking rates from ITE and ULI data, these observed Marina retail parking rates are lower. The low observed parking occupancy and low parking rate indicates that the Marina Square and Seacrest Plaza shopping centers provide a parking supply that greatly exceeds the peak parking demand for the on-site businesses. For the purposes of this study, the Marina retail parking rate of 1.55 spaces per KSF was used for conducting the shared parking analysis for the DVSP.

Size
(KSF)
Parking
Supply
Parking
Count
Parking
Occupancy
%
Parking Rate
(Space/KSF)
12:00 PM 68 45% 1.55
1:
00 PM 64 42% 1.46
5:00 PM 43 28% 0.98
6:00 PM 41 27% 0.93
54 36% 1.23Average
Marina Square
Time of
Day
15143.97
Size
(KSF)
Parking
Supply
Parking
Count
Parking
Occupancy
%
Parking Rate
(Space/KSF)
12:00 PM 141 30% 1.10
1:
00 PM 141 30% 1.10
5:00 PM 174 37% 1.36
6:00 PM 130 28% 1.02
146.5 31% 1.15Average
127.78
Seacrest Plaza
467
Time of
Day
ATTACHMENT 8
64 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
8 4. Shared Parking Analysis Methodology

Due to the DVSP’s mixed-use characteristic and geographic layout between the downtown districts, a shared parking analysis was conducted to compare peak parking demand between industry standard published parking rates and observed parking rates collected in the field. Peak parking demand by time of day was determined from the latest distribution data from either the Institute of Transpiration Engineers (ITE) or Urban Land Institute (ULI) per the applicable parking methodology for the office, retail, and residential uses.

Parking Rates
A total of three (3) different parking rates were prepared to analyze the peak parking demand for the DVSP land use scenarios and are described in Sections 5-7 of this technical report.

• Parking Rate 1 – ULI 3rd Edition (all land uses)
• Parking Rate 2 – ITE 5th Edition (all land uses)
• Parking Rate 3 – ITE 5th Edition (office & residential) and Marina field data (retail)

These industry standard parking rates use the latest qualitative studies and empirical data available for mixed-use shared parking demand. The most up to date and recommended parking source applicable for the DVSP is the Urban Land Institute 3
rd Edition.

For Parking Rate 3, the highest calculated shopping center rate from the Marina parking occupancy surveys described in Section 3 were applied to the DVSP retail uses. Residential and office land uses are based on ITE parking rates.

Parking Reduction Methodologies
A mode-share and an internal capture reduction was also applied to account for the shared parking interaction between the mixed-uses in the Specific Plan area. The following methodologies for parking analysis comparison are prepared in this technical report.

• Methodology I – 0% mode share and 0% internal capture reduction o Applied to ULI parking analysis
o Represents a conservative worst-case scenario where 100% of employees, residents, and visitors access downtown with a vehicle and use a parking space for every trip

• Methodology II – 16.5% mode share and 18% internal capture reduction o Applied to ULI parking analysis
o Represents a moderate scenario where a portion of the population regularly walks, bikes, or uses public transit to access downtown
o Assumes feasible implementation of TDM from mixed-use developments and active transportation infrastructure improvements

• Methodology III – 30% mode share and 18% internal capture reduction o Applied to ULI parking analysis
o Represents an aggressive scenario where a greater portion of the population regularly walks, bikes, or uses public transit to access downtown ATTACHMENT 8
65 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
9 o Assumes major implementation of TDM from mixed-use developments and active transportation infrastructure improvements

• Methodology IV – Base parking rates with inherent mode share and internal capture reduction o The ITE parking rates derived from empirical data sources account for mode share and internal capture reductions in their average parking demand rates o The mode share and internal capture reductions vary between each ITE land use code o Additional mode share and internal capture reductions were not applied to the ITE analysis to avoid double dipping
o Represents a moderate scenario where a portion of the population walks, bikes, or uses public transit and assumes feasible implementation of TDM (similar to Methodology II)

Mode-Share Reduction (for ULI Parking Rates)
Mode-share adjustments account for residents, visitors, and/or employees that get to and from the site via public transit, rideshare, walking, biking, or other alternative transportation modes (including single occupancy vehicle trip reductions from TDM measures). From Section 2, it is assumed that future development in the DVSP will implement various infrastructure improvements and TDM measures that will encourage alternative transportation and reduce single occupancy vehicle trips to and from the downtown area.

The 2021 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) handbook was used to determine an approximate mode-share split applicable for parking demand reductions. The CAPCOA handbook was prepared to provide a common platform of information and tools for evaluating greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction measures, climate vulnerabilities, and promoting equity to support sustainable, resilient, and equitable land use planning and project design.

Transportation emissions can be reduced by improving the emissions profile of the vehicle fleet or by reducing VMT. Most of the measures quantified in CAPCOA aim to reduce VMT and encourage mode shifts from single-occupancy vehicles to shared (e.g., transit) or active modes of transportation (e.g., bicycle). This can be accomplished by coordinating trip reduction or incentive programs; optimizing the land use of the project study area; enhancing road, bike and pedestrian networks; implementing parking policies; or improving transit systems.

A GHG/VMT reduction for online retail and online food delivery activities was also assumed for the DVSP to account for this trend in the retail market. Due to limited studies on the parking impact from these activities, a conservative minimum reduction percentage was applied.

A reduction for employee work from home (WFH) activity was not applied to the project due to limited studies quantifying a reduction impact to parking demand. For example, a company would typically not lease office space and a parking space for employees working remotely full-time; however, a company would typically need to provide a full parking space even if an employee works remotely part-time which would not change the overall parking demand. Therefore, no WFH reduction was assumed to provide a conservative analysis.

For this analysis, an equivalent 1:1 ratio was assumed for converting the GHG/VMT reduction percentage into a mode-share reduction percentage for parking demand. Based on the assumed infrastructure improvements and development characteristics in the DVSP, a conservative mode-share reduction of 16.5% and an aggressive mode-share reduction of 30% were applied to all the land uses in ATTACHMENT 8
66 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
10 the ULI shared parking analysis. These mode share percentages are consistent with other comprehensive TDM programs and represents feasible reductions that can be implemented per CAPCOA guidelines and industry best practices.

A summary of the estimated mode-share reduction and transportation measures is shown in Table 5.

Internal Capture Reduction (for ULI Parking Rates)
Internal capture adjustments account for patrons that are already parked on-site and visit multiple uses in a mixed-use development (i.e. shopping at a store then eating at a restaurant).

The 2011 Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) 684 publication was used to determine an approximate internal capture applicable for parking demand reductions. This NCHRP report provides an improved methodology to estimate how many internal trips will be generated in mixed-use developments for both origin and destination trips within a site. The methodology estimates morning and afternoon peak-period trips to and from six specific land use categories: office, retail, restaurant, residential, cinema, and hotel.

For this analysis, an equivalent 1:1 ratio was assumed for converting the internal capture trip reduction percentage into an internal capture reduction percentage for parking demand. Based on the project description and proposed Specific Plan land uses, an internal capture reduction of 18% was applied to all the land uses in the DVSP Core and Transition districts. The internal capture reduction was not applied to the Multifamily district since this zone does not have mixed-use commercial and residential components.

A summary of the estimated internal capture reduction calculations is shown in the Appendix.

Shared Parking Analysis Results
A total of 15 shared parking iterations were calculated based on the three land use scenarios, the three parking rates, and the various parking reduction methodologies applied to the DVSP. To provide a quantitative comparison between the different shared parking results, the total weekday peak hour parking demand is reported. These results are described in Sections 5-7 of this technical report.

ATTACHMENT 8
67 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
11 Table 5 – Estimated DVSP Mode-Share Parking Reduction per CAPCOA 2021

Low High
T-1 Increase Residential
Density Land Use 3.0% 8.0% DVSP density above 2025 US forecast average (30% max reduction)
T-3 Provide Transit-Oriented
Development Land Use 7.0% 10.0%
DVSP consistent with TOD principles and
located within 1/2 mile of MST SURF and
transit station improvements (31% max
reduction)
T-4
Integrate Affordable and
Below Market Rate
Housing
Land Use 3.0% 8.0% Assume a portion of residential units are BMR in DVSP (28.6% max reduction)
T-7 Implement Commute
Trip Reduction Trip Reduction 0.5% 1.0% Assume all office and retail employees eligible to particpate (4% max reduction)
T-10 Provide End-of-Trip
Bicycle Facilities Trip Reduction 0.5% 1.0% Assume bike lockers/storage, and shower facilities provided (4.4% max reduction)
T-18 Provide Pedestrian
Network Improvement Neighborhood 0.5% 1.5%
Infrastructure improvements identified in
Marina Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan
assumed with redevelopment (6.4% max
reduction)
T-19-A Construct or Improve
Bike Facility Neighborhood 0.2% 0.3%
Infrastructure improvements identified in
Marina Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan
assumed with redevelopment (0.8% max
reduction)
T-28 Provide Bus Rapid
Transit Transit 2.0% 3.5%
Proposed MST SURF and transit station
improvements in DVSP (13.8% max
reduction)
N/A Online Retail Shopping Off Model 0.5% 0.5% Assume minimum % reduction, no published sources
N/A Online Food Delivery Off Model 0.5% 0.5% Assume minimum % reduction, no published sources
Land Use 12.5% 23.8%
Trip Reduction 1.0% 2.0%
Neighborhood 0.7% 1.8%
Transit 2.0% 3.5%
Off Model 1.0% 1.0%
- 16.5% 30.0% Multiplicative total of CAPCOA Subsectors per guidelines
Total CAPCOA Transportation
GHG/VMT Reduction %
NOTES:

Low % reduction assumes feasible implementation of potential measures and moderate mode shift to alternative transportation based on inherent characteristics and goals of the DVSP.

High % reduction assumes aggressive implementation of potential measures and high mode shift to alternative transportation. Estimated reduction % shown is consistent with other comprehensive TDM programs and is the feasible max % that can be obtained under ideal conditions.

CAPCOA Transportation Measures shown are based on assumed infrastructure improvements in the DVSP and do not account for specific TDM measures for private developments.

A 1:1 ratio is assumed for converting GHG/VMT reduction percentage into an applicable mode-share reduction Online retail and delivery services assumed for project. Minimum reductions applied due to no published sources ID # CAPCOA Transportation
Measure Description Subsector
Estimated GHG/VMT
Reduction % Range Notes
CAPCOA Subsector Subtotal
GHG/VMT Reduction %
GHG/VMT reduction is the multiplicative
total of each individual transportation
measure per CAPCOA guidelines
ATTACHMENT 8
68 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
12 5. Parking Demand with ULI 3rd Edition Rates

This section provides a summary of vehicle parking demand utilizing parking rates from the Urban Land Institute 3rd Edition Shared Parking data. The parking analysis was conducted using the latest March 2020 Shared Parking Model Version 1.1 developed by ULI, International Council of Shopping Centers, and National Parking Association. The following parking rates and adjustments were selected to establish a parking baseline from empirical data representative of the DVSP’s mixed-use program.

1. Retail (Less than 400 KSF)
a. Assumed combined visitor/employee parking rate at 3.60 space/KSF b. Applied to Core and Transition districts with subtotal retail size less than 400 KSF

2. Retail (400 to 600 KSF)
a. Assumed combined visitor/employee parking rate at 2.80 space/KSF b. Applied to Core and Transition districts with subtotal retail size between 400-600 KSF

3. Retail (1,000 to 2,000 KSF)
a. Assumed combined visitor/employee parking rate at 4.40 space/KSF b. Applied to Core and Transition districts with subtotal retail size between 1,000-2,000 KSF

4. Residential Suburban
a. Assumed Studio Efficiency parking rate at 0.85 space/DU b. Assumed 1 Bedroom parking rate at 0.90 space/DU
c. Assumed 2 Bedroom parking rate at 1.65 space/DU
d. Assumed 3+ Bedroom parking rate at 2.50 space/DU
e. Assumed visitor parking rate at 0.10 space/DU
f. The dwelling unit quantity between the residential types in each DVSP land use scenario was estimated using distribution data from the 2011-2021 US Census Data Annual Characteristics of New Housing (attached in the Appendix)

5. Office (25 to 100 KSF)
a. Assumed combined visitor/employee parking rate at 3.74 space/KSF b. Applied to Core and Transition districts with subtotal office size between 25-100 KSF

6. Office (100 to 500 KSF)
a. Assumed combined visitor/employee parking rate at 3.13 space/KSF b. Applied to Core and Transition districts with subtotal office size between 100-500 KSF

Mode share and internal capture parking reductions described in Section 4 were applied to the ULI analysis model. Table 6 and the Appendix summarizes the ULI 3 rd Edition parking demand results for the
DVSP.

The peak parking demand using ULI rates varies depending on the parking reduction methodology and land use scenario. The highest peak parking demand is 11,683 spaces at 8 PM (Land Use Scenario C, Methodology I) while the lowest peak parking demand is 3,123 spaces at 8 PM (Land Use Scenario A, Methodology III).

Overall, the peak parking demand for each iteration does not exceed the required minimum parking supply derived from the City Municipal Code. In addition, the peak parking demand does not exceed the estimated parking supply of 7,990 spaces for the existing uses (Land Use Scenario A).

ATTACHMENT 8
69 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
13 Table 6 – ULI Parking Rate Summary

A B C
Parking Rate
Source Methodology Land Use
Land Use
Parking
Rate
Existing
Uses
DVSP
Minimum
Buildout
DVSP
Maximum
Buildout
Office 3.1 to 3.7 47 72 108
Retail 2.8 to 4.4 2,116 3,141 5,240
Residential 0.8 to 2.5 2,802 5,723 6,336
4,965 8,935 11,683
8 PM 8 PM 8 PM
Office 3.1 to 3.7 39 61 76
Retail 2.8 to 4.4 1,348 1,895 3,402
Residential 0.8 to 2.5 2,340 4,807 5,322
3,726 6,764 8,800
8 PM 12 AM 8 PM
Office 3.1 to 3.7 31 51 63
Retail 2.8 to 4.4 1,130 1,580 2,836
Residential 0.8 to 2.5 1,961 4,008 4,435
3,123 5,637 7,333
8 PM 8 PM 8 PM
5,863 10,121 13,650
7,990 TBD TBD
Weekday Total Peak Parking Demand (# vehicle spaces)
Shared Use Parking Demand Analysis by Peak Time of Day Land Use Scenario 1 ULI (3rd Ed)
I
0% Mode Share
0% Internal Capture Total Peak Demand
Peak Hour Period
II

16.5% Mode Share
18% Internal Capture Total Peak Demand
Peak Hour Period
III
30% Mode Share
18% Internal Capture Total Peak Demand
Peak Hour Period
Marina Municipal Code Required Parking
Estimated Parking Supply in DVSP
NOTES:

Internal Capture accounts for patrons that are already parked and visit multiple land uses in a mixed-use site. For ULI, percentage is estimated from DVSP land uses based on NCHRP 684 methodology for mixed-use developments. For ITE, internal capture is accounted for in the base parking demand rate. Internal Capture reduction not applied to Multifamily DVSP District since this zone does not have mixed-use commercial and residential components.

ATTACHMENT 8
70 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
14 A B C
Parking Rate
Source Methodology Land Use
Land
Use
Unit
Existing
Uses
DVSP
Minimum
Buildout
DVSP
Maximum
Buildout
Office
Retail
Residential DU 1.22 1.22 1.22
8 PM 8 PM 8 PM
Office
Retail
Residential DU 1.02 1.02 1.02
8 PM 8 PM 8 PM
Office
Retail
Residential DU 0.85 0.85 0.85
8 PM 8 PM 8 PM
Internal Capture accounts for patrons that are already parked and visit multiple land uses in a mixed-use site. For ULI, percentage is estimated from DVSP land uses based on NCHRP 684 methodology for mixed-use developments. For ITE, internal capture is accounted for in the base parking demand rate. Internal Capture reduction not applied to Multifamily DVSP District since this zone does not have mixed-use commercial and residential components.

NOTES:

Land Use Program based on City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan (April 2019) Adjusted Peak Parking Demand Rate shown provides comparision between each Land Use Scenario (A,B,C) accounting for differences in land use size, parking reduction methodology, and peak hour period.

III
30% Mode Share
18% Internal Capture
KSF 1.15 1.06 1.21
Peak Hour Period
Peak Hour Period
II

16.5% Mode Share
18% Internal Capture
KSF 1.38 1.27 1.45
Peak Hour Period
Adjusted Parking Demand Rate (# spaces / LU) by Peak Time of Day Shared Use Parking Demand Analysis by Peak Time of
Day
Land Use Scenario
1 ULI (3rd Ed)
I
0% Mode Share
0% Internal Capture
KSF 2.15 2.09 2.24
ATTACHMENT 8
71 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
15 6. Parking Demand with ITE 5th Edition Rates

This section provides a summary of vehicle parking demand utilizing parking rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual 5th Edition. The following parking rates and adjustments were selected to establish a parking baseline from empirical data representative of the DVSP’s mixed-use characteristic.

1. ITE 220 – Multifamily Housing (low-rise) land use
a. Assumed average parking rate at 1.21 space per residential dwelling unit

2. ITE 710 – General Office Building land use
a. Assumed average parking rate at 2.39 space per 1,000 square-feet of office

3. ITE 820 – Shopping Center land use
a. Assumed average parking rate at 3.77 space per 1,000 square-feet of retail

The ITE parking rates derived from empirical data sources account for mode share and internal capture reductions in their average parking demand rates; therefore, no additional parking reductions were applied to the analysis model. Table 7 summarizes the total weekday peak hour parking demand for the DVSP using Marina data and ITE parking rates. A detailed peak parking demand by time of day for each iteration is attached in the Appendix.

The highest peak parking demand is 9,833 spaces at 1PM (Land Use Scenario C) while the lowest peak parking demand is 2,597 spaces at 6 PM (Land Use Scenario A).

ATTACHMENT 8
72 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
16 Table 7 – ITE Parking Rate Summary

A B C
Parking Rate
Source Methodology Land Use
Land Use
Parking
Rate
Existing
Uses
DVSP
Minimum
Buildout
DVSP
Maximum
Buildout
Office 2.39 151 150 1,657
Retail 3.77 2,243 2,928 5,907
Residential 1.21 1,840 4,154 2,269
4,234 7,232 9,833
6 PM 7 PM 1 PM
5,863 10,121 13,650
7,990 TBD TBD
2 ITE (5th Ed)
IV
Base Rates with
inherent Mode Share
& Internal Capture Total Peak Demand
Peak Hour Period
Marina Municipal Code Required Parking
Weekday Total Peak Parking Demand (# vehicle spaces)
Shared Use Parking Demand Analysis by Peak Time of Day Land Use Scenario Internal Capture accounts for patrons that are already parked and visit multiple land uses in a mixed-use site. For ULI, percentage is estimated from DVSP land uses based on NCHRP 684 methodology for mixed-use developments. For ITE, internal capture is accounted for in the base parking demand rate. Internal Capture reduction not applied to Multifamily DVSP District since this zone does not have mixed-use commercial and residential components.

Estimated Parking Supply in DVSP
NOTES:

Land Use Program based on City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan (April 2019) Parking Demand shown is the peak shared use by time of day from ITE or ULI distribution data. See individual analysis sheets for peak hour period
Mode Share accounts for multi-modal users (walk, bike, transit, etc.). For ULI, percentage is estimated from the potential TDM measures and alternative transportation mode infrastructure proposed in DVSP based on 2021 CAPCOA Transportation Measures / Guidelines. For ITE, mode share is accounted for in the base parking demand rate.A B C Parking Rate
Source Methodology Land Use
Land
Use
Uni
t
Existing
Uses
DVSP
Minimum
Bui
ldout
DVSP
Maximum
Bui
ldout
Office
Retail
Residential DU 0.80 0.88 0.44
6 PM 7 PM 1 PM
Internal Capture accounts for patrons that are already parked and visit multiple land uses in a mixed-use site. For ULI, percentage is estimated from DVSP land uses based on NCHRP 684 methodology for mixed-use developments. For ITE, inte
rnal capture is accounted for in the base parking demand rate. Internal Capture reduction not applied to Multifamily DVSP District since this zone does not have mixed-use commercial and residential components.

Adjusted Parking Demand Rate (# spaces / LU) by Peak Time of Day Shared Use Parking Demand Analysis by Peak Time of
Day
Land Use Scenario
NOTES:

For comparison purposes only, a summary of vehicle parking demand was calculated using shopping center rates from the Marina parking occupancy surveys described in Section 3 applied to the DVSP retail uses. For the residential and office land uses, ITE parking rates were assumed. The following parking rates and adjustments were selected to establish a parking baseline from empirical data representative of the DVSP’s mixed-use characteristic.

1. ITE 220 – Multifamily Housing (low-rise) land use
a. Assumed average parking rate at 1.21 space per residential dwelling unit

2. ITE 710 – General Office Building land use
a. Assumed average parking rate at 2.39 space per 1,000 square-feet of office

3. Shopping Center land use from September 2022 Marina occupancy surveys a. Assumed highest parking rate at 1.55 space per 1,000 square-feet of retail from collected field data at Marina Square Shopping Mall

The ITE parking rates derived from empirical data sources account for mode share and internal capture reductions in their average parking demand rates; therefore, no additional parking reductions were applied to the analysis model. Table 8 summarizes the total weekday peak hour parking demand for the DVSP using Marina data and ITE parking rates. A detailed peak parking demand by time of day for each iteration is attached in the Appendix.

The highest peak parking demand is 6,648 spaces at 7 PM (Land Use Scenario C) while the lowest peak parking demand is 1,864 spaces at 7 PM (Land Use Scenario A).

It should be noted that for the DVSP minimum buildout (Land Use Scenario B), the peak parking demand of 5,690 spaces occurs during the 12 AM midnight hour which is when office and retail businesses are closed (0% demand) and when all the residents are parked at home (100% demand). The peak parking demand for all the mixed land uses occurs at 7 PM, but the maximum demand was shown for comparison purposes.

Compared to the other parking rate sources, this parking analysis yields the lowest peak parking demand since the observed retail parking rate of 1.55 space per KSF is lower than the national average. Overall, the peak parking demand for each iteration does not exceed the required minimum parking supply derived from the City Municipal Code. In addition, the peak parking demand does not exceed the estimated parking supply of 7,990 spaces for the existing uses (Land Use Scenario A).

Due to limited field data and sample size of the estimated Marina retail parking demand, the Marina and ITE shared parking results in Table 8 are not an accurate representation of the DVSP parking condition and should only be used for comparison purposes against the other parking analysis iterations presented in this report.

ATTACHMENT 8
74 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
18 Table 8 – Marina and ITE Parking Rate Summary (Comparison)

A B* C
Parking Rate
Source Methodology Land Use
Land Use
Parking
Rate
Existing
Uses
DVSP
Minimum
Buildout*
DVSP
Maximum
Buildout
Office 2.39 83 0 218
Retail 1.55 859 0 1,943
Residential 1.21 2,034 5,690 4,599
2,976 5,690 6,760
7 PM 12 AM 7 PM
5,863 10,121 13,650
7,990 TBD TBD
Scenario B peak demand of 5,690 occurs at 12 AM but max mixed use parking peak of 5,508 occurs at 7PM Estimated Parking Supply in DVSP
3 Marina Data
& ITE (5th Ed)
IV
Base Rates with
inherent Mode Share
& Internal Capture Total Peak Demand
Peak Hour Period
Marina Municipal Code Required Parking
NOTES:

Weekday Total Peak Parking Demand (# vehicle spaces)
Shared Use Parking Demand Analysis by Peak Time of Day Land Use Scenario A B* C
Parking Rate
Source Methodology Land Use
Land
Use
Un
it
Existing
Uses
DVSP
Minimum
Bu
ildout*
DVSP
Maximum
Bu
ildout
Office
Retail
Residential DU 0.88 1.21 0.88
7 PM 12 AM 7 PM
Scenario B peak demand of 5,690 occurs at 12 AM but max mixed use parking peak of 5,508 occurs at 7PM NOTES:

Mode Share accounts for multi-modal users (walk, bike, transit, etc.). For ULI, percentage is estimated from the potential TDM measures and alternative transportation mode infrastructure proposed in DVSP based on 2021 CAPCOA Tr
ansportation Measures / Guidelines. For ITE, mode share is accounted for in the base parking demand rate. 3 Marina Data
& I
TE (5th Ed)
IV
Base Rates with
in
herent Mode Share
& Internal Capture
KSF 0.94 0.00 0.90
Peak Hour Period
Internal Capture accounts for patrons that are already parked and visit multiple land uses in a mixed-use site. For ULI, percentage is estimated from DVSP land uses based on NCHRP 684 methodology for mixed-use developments. For ITE, int
ernal capture is accounted for in the base parking demand rate. Internal Capture reduction not applied to Multifamily DVSP District since this zone does not have mixed-use commercial and residential components.

Adjusted Parking Demand Rate (# spaces / LU) by Peak Time of Day Shared Use Parking Demand Analysis by Peak Time of
Day
Land Use Scenario
ATTACHMENT 8
75 City of Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
Shared Parking Analysis
19 8. Parking Results and Recommendations

Shared Parking Conclusion
Based on the parking analysis results, the estimated weekday peak parking demand will vary depending on the assumed land use scenario, parking rates, mode-share, and internal capture for the retail, office, and residential use scenarios.

1. The weekday peak parking demand for each analysis iteration does not exceed the required parking supply derived from the City Municipal Code.
a. The parking analysis indicates that the required parking supply ratios in the Municipal Code exceed the average parking demand rates from ITE and ULI industry data. b. The 2022 parking occupancy surveys at the Marina Square and Seacrest Plaza shopping centers supports this observation since both shopping centers were under parked with an average occupancy below 50%.
c. It is recommended that the City to review the current Municipal Code parking requirements or establish a new parking code standard for the Downtown Specific Plan area to prevent future developments from providing excess vehicle parking beyond the anticipated peak demand.

Marina City CouncilJanuary 18, 2023

Marina City Council
January 18, 2023