EXHIBIT A
116
City of Marina TABLE 12
Total Assessed Value of Property by Use Code, Citywide
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Category 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Residential 1,042,168,418 1,119,179,396 1,191,143,317 1,304,549,843 1,434,005,745 1,624,632,460 1,832,903,173 2,038,469,193 2,171,042,885 2,471,422,537 Commercial 214,316,449 230,300,136 235,961,520 239,333,525 280,826,470 299,834,075 299,403,469 323,010,924 333,780,752 340,238,166 Vacant 91,495,277 92,842,928 113,779,359 159,784,721 86,517,557 107,563,261 118,749,943 102,071,314 171,033,049 146,279,386 Professional 27,065,788 27,188,660 27,731,885 28,154,791 55,396,279 74,410,577 81,659,246 83,292,426 84,155,329 85,838,430 Industrial 43,126,163 45,472,293 47,528,389 50,935,771 50,311,955 51,429,463 53,428,857 54,707,908 55,772,674 56,902,068 Miscellaneous 23,885,720 24,134,083 24,581,435 24,859,615 28,798,906 30,396,302 31,701,673 32,438,297 32,682,443 33,096,219 Recreation 6,649,897 6,672,672 5,890,646 5,970,475 6,081,476 6,198,320 14,250,237 14,522,610 21,926,784 22,356,651 Rural 10,817,599 10,896,679 11,112,371 11,280,290 13,054,808 14,390,658 14,678,468 14,972,034 15,127,142 19,166,807 Social 13,342,598 13,405,529 13,659,612 13,862,915 14,456,257 14,745,873 15,350,500 15,654,726 15,809,711 15,348,843 Institution 8,890,706 9,014,743 9,217,872 10,257,867 10,439,846 10,584,094 11,083,917 11,248,345 11,222,180 10,604,234 Unknown 11,523,829 11,910,872 18,220,975 18,563,065 14,390,755 14,577,357 8,519,215 8,687,615 3,443,404 3,510,286 Total Secured Value 1,493,282,444 1,591,017,991 1,698,827,381 1,867,552,878 1,994,280,054 2,248,762,440 2,481,728,698 2,699,075,392 2,915,996,353 3,204,763,627 Unsecured 57,910,086 60,026,223 60,963,585 70,591,640 70,557,468 68,650,466 74,208,552 74,931,939 94,107,175 114,361,923 Exemptions 89,561,968 89,919,153 117,697,975 134,424,573 139,980,059 149,280,776 170,192,050 174,860,155 172,057,994 180,431,417 Total Assessed Value 1,461,630,562 1,561,125,061 1,642,092,991 1,803,719,945 1,924,857,463 2,168,132,130 2,385,745,200 2,599,147,176 2,838,045,534 3,138,694,133 Source: Monterey County Assessor data, MuniServices, LLC / Avenu Insights & Analytics Use code categories are based on Monterey County Assessor's data Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
105
EXHIBIT A
117
City of Marina TABLE 13
Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates
Last Nine Fiscal Years
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Basic City and County Levy
Monterey County-Wide 0.246232 0.246232 0.246232 0.246232 0.246232 0.246232 0.246232 0.246232 0.246232 0.246232 County Library 0.022722 0.022722 0.022722 0.022722 0.022722 0.022722 0.022722 0.022722 0.022722 0.022722 City of Marina 0.195687 0.195687 0.195687 0.195687 0.195687 0.195687 0.195687 0.195687 0.195687 0.195687 Monterey County Office of Education 0.026664 0.026664 0.026664 0.026664 0.026664 0.026664 0.026664 0.026664 0.026664 0.026664 Monterey Pen Unified School District 0.437978 0.437978 0.437978 0.437978 0.437978 0.437978 0.437978 0.437978 0.437978 0.437978 Monterey Pen College 0.047299 0.047299 0.047299 0.047299 0.047299 0.047299 0.047299 0.047299 0.047299 0.047299 MCWRA Dist 0.001391 0.001391 0.001391 0.001391 0.001391 0.001391 0.001391 0.001391 0.001391 0.001391 Monterey Regional Park Dist 0.011593 0.011593 0.011593 0.011593 0.011593 0.011593 0.011593 0.011593 0.011593 0.011593 North Salinas Valley Mosquito Abater 0.008347 0.008347 0.008347 0.008347 0.008347 0.008347 0.008347 0.008347 0.008347 0.008347 Moss Landing Harbor Dist 0.002087 0.002087 0.002087 0.002087 0.002087 0.002087 0.002087 0.002087 0.002087 0.002087 TOTAL 1% BREAKOUT 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000 Override Assessments
City of Marina debt service 0.004684 0.004602 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Marina Library 2002 Election Series 2005 0.028118 0.027962 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Monterey Pen CCD 2013 Refund 0.015772 0.032471 0.023039 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Monterey Pen USD 2010 Ser A & 2012 Election 0.021309 0.022774 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Marina 2015 GO Refunding Bonds 0.000000 0.000000 0.022348 0.023068 0.021612 0.023200 0.019640 0.022180 0.016740 0.017420 Monterey Penn CCD 2002 BC & 2013 Ref AB & 2016 Ref 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.022336 0.021655 0.021187 0.020484 0.020166 0.032006 0.030336 Monterey Pen USD 2010 Ser A & B 0.000000 0.000000 0.030000 0.030000 0.028902 0.091957 0.117071 0.041454 0.060422 0.056544 TOTAL OVERRIDE RATE 0.069883 0.087809 0.075387 0.075404 0.072169 0.136344 0.157195 0.083800 0.109168 0.104300 Total Tax Rate 1.069883 1.087809 1.075387 1.075404 1.072169 1.136344 1.157195 1.083800 1.109168 1.104300 Source: County Auditor/Controller data, MuniServices, LLC /Avenu Insights & Analytics Rates are not adjusted for ERAF
TRA 12-004 is represented for this report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
106
EXHIBIT A
118
City of Marina TABLE 14
Principal Property Tax Payers
Last Fiscal Year and Nine Years Ago
Taxpayer
Taxable Value
($)
Percent of
Total City
Taxable
Value (%)
Taxable Value
($)
Percent of
Total City
Taxable
Value (%)
Hamstra-Appleton LLC 54,431,255 1.73%
LV44 Limited Partnership 45,112,405 1.44% 28,357,558 1.94% The Gates At Marina LLC 40,238,000 1.28%
Pacific Coast Highway Property LLC 38,021,108 1.21%
Shea Homes Limited Partnership 35,466,888 1.13%
Wathen Castanos Peterson Homes Inc Et Al 34,130,283 1.09% Marina Developers Inc 32,659,017 1.04%
HHLP Sanctuary Associates LLC 32,109,550 1.02%
MHC Marina Dunes L P 29,124,185 0.93%
Wal-Mart Stores Inc 28,832,570 0.92% 22,688,674 1.55% Joby Aviation 27,806,460 0.89%
Target Corporation 25,284,000 0.81% 20,500,000 1.40%
Marina Hotels CI LLC 24,282,857 0.77%
Community Hospital Properties Inc 24,054,958 0.77% 21,947,078 1.50% Cemex Inc 20,922,383 0.67% 16,999,679 1.16%
Monterey Peninsula Hotels Group LP 20,026,452 0.64%
Tate Michael J Tr 18,827,242 0.60% 15,531,233 1.06%
Marina Community Partners LLC 16,486,424 0.53% 49,775,668 3.41% Sea Breeze Marina LLC 15,104,186 0.48%
SPPI Commercial LLC 14,320,541 0.46%
Valle Del Sol Properties LLC Et Al 13,998,140 0.45%
189 Seaside LLC 12,818,257 0.41%
Preston Park Sustainable Community Nonprofit Corp 11,501,032 0.37% SKN Properties 11,284,876 0.36%
Foux Anthony Tr & Zimmerman Gregory J 10,170,776 0.32%
Shea Marina Village LLC 41,339,664 2.83%
Cypress Marina Heights LP 17,652,823 1.21%
Alliance Residential Co Inc. 14,041,561 0.96%
MDR TMI LLC 12,450,000 0.85%
Sierra Pacific Properties Inc. 10,881,808 0.74%
Kohls Department Stores Inc. 10,405,716 0.71%
Ocean Lodging LLC 9,615,309 0.66%
Cypress Gates Inc. 9,408,116 0.64%
ELS Properties Corp 8,474,648 0.58%
Brooks William H 8,263,530 0.57%
Marina Cypress Apts LLC 7,880,579 0.54%
Vega Nelson A Susan J 7,634,707 0.52%
Vieira Linda M Manuel A 7,201,980 0.49%
Marina Beach Inn Inc. 7,046,897 0.48%
Cypress Sands Apartment Partne 6,675,000 0.46%
Marina RV LLC 6,649,897 0.45%
Nehawandian Abolghassen Parido 6,343,681 0.43%
Burch Roger A Michele 6,112,814 0.42%
Total Top 25 Taxpayers 637,013,845 20.32% 373,878,620 25.56% Total Taxable Value 3,138,694,133 100.00% 1,461,630,562 100.00% 2022-23 2013-14
Source: County Assessor data, MuniServices, LLC / Avenu Insights & Analytics 107
EXHIBIT A
119
City of Marina TABLE 15
Principal Employers
Business Name
Number of
Employees
Percent of Total
Employment (%)
Monterey Peninsula Unified School District* 251 1.89%
Walmart Supercenter** 225 1.69%
Target** 180 1.35%
Monterey Regional Waste Management District 134 1.01%
City of Marina 90 0.68%
Scudder Roofing Company 85 0.64%
Monterey One Water Treatment Plant*** 84 0.63%
Kohl's 63 0.47%
REI - Recreational Equipment Inc. 55 0.41%
Michaels Craft Store 26 0.20%
Total Top 10 Employers 1,193 8.97%
Total City Labor Force (1) 13,300
** Previous year's count applied. No response from business. *** Includes Marina and Monterey location.
2022-23
Source: MuniServices, LLC / Avenu Insights & Analytics Results based on direct correspondence with city’s local businesses. * Only schools located within the City of Marina.
1.) Total City Labor Force provided by EDD Labor Force Data. 108
EXHIBIT A
120
City of Marina Table 16
Overlapping Debt
2022-23 Assessed Valuation: 3,153,911,885$
Total Debt City’s Share of
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT: 6/30/2023 % Applicable (1) Debt 6/30/23 Monterey County Water Resources Agency, Zone No. 2 C 18,755,000$ 3.790% 710,815$ Hartnell Joint Community College District 243,151,667 0.100% 243,152 Monterey Peninsula Community College District 118,657,396 6.767% 8,029,546 Monterey Peninsula Unified School District 216,717,679 18.745% 40,623,729 North Monterey County Unified School District 27,990,000 0.439% 122,876 City of Marina 6,135,000 100.000% 6,135,000
TOTAL DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT 55,865,118$ DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND DEBT:
Monterey County General Fund Obligations 119,773,645$ 3.79% 4,539,421$ Monterey County Office of Education General Fund Obligations 4,534,000 379.00% 171,839 North Monterey County Unified School District Certificates of Participation 2,550,000 43.90% 11,195 City of Marina General Fund Obligations 10,550,000 100.00% 10,550,000 (2) TOTAL GROSS DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND DEBT 15,272,455$ Less: Monterey County supported obligations 108,114
TOTAL NET DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND DEBT 15,164,341$ OVERLAPPING TAX INCREMENT DEBT (Successor Agencies): 62,225,000$ 69.019 - 100. % 53,541,026$ TOTAL DIRECT DEBT 16,685,000$
TOTAL GROSS OVERLAPPING DEBT 107,993,599$
TOTAL NET OVERLAPPING DEBT 107,885,485$
GROSS COMBINED TOTAL DEBT 124,678,599$ (3)
NET COMBINED TOTAL DEBT 124,570,485$
(2) Excludes Certificates of Participation dated 7/7/22. (3) Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes, enterprise revenue, mortgage revenue and non-bonded capital lease obligations.
Ratios to 2022-23 Assessed Valuation:
Direct Debt ($6,135,000) 0.19%
Total Direct and Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt 1.77% Total Direct Debt ($6,430,000) 0.53%
Gross Combined Total Debt 3.95%
Net Combined Total Debt 3.95%
Ratios to Redevelopment Successor Agency Incremental Valuation ($1,287,468,432):
Total Overlapping Tax Increment Debt 4.16%
Source: Avenu Insights & Analytics
California Municipal Statistics, Inc.
(1) The percentage of overlapping debt applicable to the city is estimated using taxable assessed property value. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of the overlapping district's assessed value that is within the boundaries of the city divided by the district's total taxable assessed value.
109
EXHIBIT A
121
EXHIBIT A
122
Chava
n & Associates, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130
Morgan Hill, CA 95037
CITY OF
MARINA, CALIFORNIA
SINGLE
AUDIT REPORT
FOR THE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
EXHIBIT B
123
CITY OF MARINA, CALIFORNIA
SINGLE AUDIT REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
PAGE NO.
Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program and Report on Internal Control Over Compliance in Accordance with Uniform Guidance .......................................................................................................... 1 - 3
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ...................................................................... 4
Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ....................................................... 5
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs:
Section I - Summary of Auditor’s Results ..................................................................... 6 Section II - Financial Statement Findings ...................................................................... 7 Section III - Federal Awards Findings and Questioned Costs........... ............................ 7
Summary Schedule of Prior Year Findings ......................................................................... 8
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ................................. 9 - 10
EXHIBIT B
124
Page | 1 15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130 Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH
MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM AND REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
COMPLIANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the
City Council of the City of Marina
Marina, California
Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program
Opinion on Each Major Federal Program
We have audited the City of Marina’s (the City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements identified as subject to audit in the OMB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City’s major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2023. The City’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor’s results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs.
In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2023.
Basis for Opinion on Each Major federal programs
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS); the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (Government Auditing Standards); and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Our responsibilities under those standards and Uniform Guidance are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City ’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.
Responsibilities of Management for Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the City’s federal programs.
EXHIBIT B
125
Page | 2 15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130 Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the City’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance will always detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material, if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the City’s compliance with the requirements of each major federal program as a whole.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance, we:
• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the City’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. • Obtain an understanding of the City’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.
Report on Internal Control over Compliance
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonab le possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis.
A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency , or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
EXHIBIT B
126
Page | 3 15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130 Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance th at might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not identified.
Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
March 30, 2024
Morgan Hill, California
EXHIBIT B
127
CITY OF MARINA, CALIFORNIA
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.
4 Pass
Assistance Through Federal
Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor/Program Title Listing Number Expenditures U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Passed-through program from the State of California
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 (1) N/A 5,176,506 $ Total U.S. Department of the Treasury 5,176,506
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Program 97.083 N/A 318,998 Total U.S. Department of Homeland Security 318,998
TOTAL EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS 5,495,504 $
(1) Audited as major program
Notes:
a) The City has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. b) There are no federal grants passed through to subrecipients.
EXHIBIT B
128
CITY OF MARINA, CALIFORNIA
NOTES TO SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
5 Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal grant activity of the City of Marina (the City) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 , Un iform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards . Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Pass -through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. The City has elected not to use the 10 percent de - minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.
Note 3. Relationship to the Basic Financial Statements
The amounts reported in the accompanying schedule agree, in all material respects, to amounts reported within the City’s financial statements. Federal award revenues are reported principally in the City’s financial statements as intergovernmental revenues.
Note 4. Relationship to Federal Financial Reports
Amounts reported in the accompanying schedule agree or can be reconciled with the amounts reported or to be reported in the federal financial reports.
Note 5. Pass-Through Entities' Identifying Number
When federal awards are received from a pass- through entity, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards shows, if available, the identifying number assigned by the pass -through entity. When no identifying number is shown, the City has determined that no identifying number is assigned for the program, or the City was unable to obtain an identifying number from the pass-through entity.
EXHIBIT B
129
CITY OF MARINA, CALIFORNIA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
6 Section I - Summary of Auditor's Results
Financial State me nts
Type of auditor's report issued
Internal control over financial reporting:
Material weaknesses? Yes x No
Significant deficiencies identified not
considered to be material weaknesses? Yes x None Reported Non-compliance material to financial statements noted? Yes x No Fe de ral Awards
Internal control over major programs:
Material weaknesses? Yes x No
Significant deficiencies identified not
considered to be material weaknesses? Yes x None Reported Type of auditor's report issued on compliance over major programs Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(a) Yes x No
Identification of Major Programs:
Name of Federal Program
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Dollar threshold used to distinguish between
type A and type B programs:
Auditee qualified as low risk auditee? x Yes No
Unmodified
Unmodified
750,000$
Assistance Listing
21.027
EXHIBIT B
130
CITY OF MARINA, CALIFORNIA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
7 Section II - Financial Statement Findings
No findings noted.
Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs
No findings noted.
EXHIBIT B
131
CITY OF MARINA, CALIFORNIA
SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
8 Section II - Financial Statement Findings
No findings noted.
Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs
No findings noted.
EXHIBIT B
132
Page | 9 15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130,Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT
OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the
City Council of the City of Marina
Marina, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the City of Marina (the “City”) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated March 30, 2024.
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.
Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified.
Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those
EXHIBIT B
133
Page | 10 15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130,Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
March 30, 2024
Morgan Hill, California
EXHIBIT B
134
Page | 1 15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
To the City Council of the
City of Marina
We have aud
ited the basic financial statements of the City of Marina as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023, and have issued our report thereon dated March 30, 2024. Professional standards require that we advise you of the following matters relating to our audit.
Our Re
sponsibility under Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards
As com
municated in our engagement letter, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to form and express an opinion(s) about whether the financial statements that have been prepared by management with your oversight are presented fairly, in all material respects, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our audit of the financial statements does not relieve you or management of your respective responsibilities.
Our respons
ibility, as prescribed by professional standards, is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, as part of our audit, we considered the internal control of the City of Marina solely for the purpose of determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such internal control.
We a
re also responsible for communicating significant matters related to the audit that are, in our professional judgment, relevant to your responsibilities in overseeing the financial reporting process. However, we are not required to design procedures for the purpose of identifying other matters to communicate to you.
Other
Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements Pursuant
to professional standards, our responsibility as auditors for other information in documents containing City of Marina’s audited financial statements does not extend beyond the financial information identified in the audit report, and we are not required to perform any procedures to corroborate such other information.
Our respons
ibility also includes communicating to you any information which we believe is a material misstatement of fact. Nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that such information, or its manner of presentation, is materially inconsistent with the information, or manner of its presentation, appearing in the financial statements.
EXHIBIT C
135
Page | 2 15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
Planned Scope and Timing of the Audit
We conducted our audit consistent with the planned scope and timing we previously communicated with management.
Compliance with All Ethics Requirements Regarding Independence
The engagement team, others in our firm, as appropriate, and our firm have complied with all relevant ethical requirements regarding independence.
Significant Risks Identified
We did not identify any significant risks that required special audit consideration.
Qualitative Aspects of the City’s Significant Accounting Practices
Significant Accounting Policies
Management has the responsibility to select and use appropriate accounting policies. A summary of the significant accounting policies adopted by the City of Marina is included in Note 1 to the financial statements. There have been no initial selection of accounting policies and no changes in significant accounting policies or their application during June 30, 2023 other then the adoption of GASB 96, Subscription-Based Information Technology Arrangements. No matters have come to our attention that would require us, under professional standards, to inform you about (1) the methods used to account for significant unusual transactions and (2) the effect of significant accounting policies in controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus.
Significant Accounting Estimates
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management’s current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events.
Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ markedly from management’s current judgments.
The most sensitive accounting estimates affecting the financial statements include accumulated depreciation, depreciation expense, market value adjustments related to LAIF , actuarial assumptions included in employee retirement plans that impact pension and other postemployment balances reported in the financial statements, and net present value calculations for right of use assets and leases.
EXHIBIT C
136
Page | 3 15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the identified estimates and determined that it is reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole and in relation to the applicable opinion units.
Financial Statement Disclosures
Certain financial statement disclosures involve significant judgment and are particularly sensitive because of their significance to financial statement users. The most sensitive disclosures affecting City of Marina’s financial statements relate to cash and investments, leases receivable, capital assets, pensions and long-term liabilities.
Significant Unusual Transactions
For purposes of this communication, professional standards require us to communicate to you significant unusual transactions identified during our audit. No significant unusual transactions were identified as a result of our audit procedures that required the attention of management.
Identified or Suspected Fraud
We did not identify nor obtain information that indicates that fraud may have occurred.
Significant Difficulties Encountered during the Audit
We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management relating to the performance of the audit.
Uncorrected and Corrected Misstatements
For purposes of this communication, professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that we believe are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Further, professional standards require us to also communicate the effect of uncorrected misstatements related to prior periods on the relevant classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures, and the financial statements as a whole and each appli cable opinion unit. There were no uncorrected financial statement misstatements identified.
In addition, professional standards require us to communicate to you all material, corrected misstatements that were brought to the attention of management as a result of our audit procedures. The material misstatements that we identified as a result of our audit procedures were brought to the attention of, and corrected by, management.
EXHIBIT C
137
Page | 4 15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
Disagreements with Management
For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, which could be significant to the City of Marina’s financial statements or the auditor’s report. No such disagreements arose during the course of the audit.
Circumstances that Affect the Form and Content of the Auditor’s Report
For purposes of this letter, professional standards require that we communicate any circumstances that affect the form and content of our auditor’s report. There were no circumstances that affect the form and content of our auditor’s report.
Representations Requested from Management
We have requested certain written representations from management, which are included in the attached letter dated March 30, 2024.
Management’s Consultations with Other Accountants
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters. Management informed us that, and to our knowledge, there were no consultations with other accountants regarding auditing and accounting matters.
Other Significant Matters, Findings, or Issues
In the normal course of our professional association with the City of Marina, we generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, operating and regulatory conditions affecting the City, and operational plans and strategies that may affect the risks of material misstatement. None of the matters discussed resulted in a condition to our retention as the City of Marina’s auditors.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board and management of the City of Marina and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.
March 30, 2024
Morgan Hill, California
EXHIBIT C
138
Page | 1 15105 Concord Circle, Ste 130, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
City of Marina
City Council and Management
Marina, California
In planni
ng and performing our audit of the financial statements of City of Marina as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, we considered City of Marina ’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of City of Marina ’s internal control.
Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of City of Marina’s internal control over financial reporting.
A defi
ciency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility exists when the likelihood of an event occurring is either reasonably possible or probable as defined as follows:
• Reasonab
ly possible: The chance of the future event or events occurring is more than remote but less than likely.
• Probabl
e: The future event or events are likely to occur.
Our cons
ideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses.
Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified.
The f
ollowing is a summary of new accounting pronouncements from the Governmental Accounting Standards Board:
GASB
Statement No. 100, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections—an amendment of GASB Statement No. 62, effective fiscal 2024.
This
statement enhances accounting and financial reporting requirements for accounting changes and error corrections to provide more understandable, reliable, relevant, consistent, and comparable information for making decisions or assessing accountability. GASB 100 also requires disclosure in notes to financial statements of descriptive information about accounting changes and error corrections, such as their nature. And GASB 100 addresses how information that is affected by a change in accounting principle or error correction should be presented in required supplementary information (RSI) and supplementary information (SI).
EXHIBIT D
139
Page | 2 15 105 Concord Circle, Ste 130, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
GASB Statement No. 101, Compensated Absences, effective fiscal 2025.
Updates the recognition and measurement guidance for compensated absences by:
1. Aligning the recognition and measurement guidance under a unified model
2. Amending certain previously required disclosures
3. Amends the existing requirement to disclose the gross increases and decreases in a liability for compensated absences to allow governments to disclose only the net change in the liability
4. Supersedes GASB 16
The purpose of this communication, which is an integral part of our audit, is to describe, for management and those charged with governance, the scope of our testing of internal control and the results of that testing. Accordingly, this communication is not intended to be and should not be used for any other purpose.
Respectfully,
March 30, 2024
Morgan Hill, California
EXHIBIT D
140
June 27, 2024 Item No. 11a
Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the City Council of July 2, 2024
CITY COUNCIL OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2024 -, MODIFYING TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND
PERSONNEL) TO UPDATE TERMINOLOGY IN MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR INCLUSIVITY: REPLACING 'COUNCILMAN' WITH 'COUNCILMEMBER’.
THIS ACTION IS NOT A PROJECT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
RECOMMENDATION
1. The City Council shall open a public hearing and consider adopting an ordinance amending the Marina Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) to update terminology in the Code for inclusivity: replacing “councilman” with “councilmember”.
2. Find that the action is not a project under CEQA.
BACKGROUND
The Marina Muni cipal Code, Title 2, Administration and Personnel, currently uses the term “councilman” in Chapters 2.04 (City Council) and 2.08 (City Manager). These sections of the code have remained unchanged since 1975, reflecting an outdated and non-inclusive terminology that fails to represent the diverse composition of our community and modern-day governance.
ANALYSIS
To ensure that the language withi n our Municipal C
ode accurately reflec ts the dive rsity and
inclusivity of our City Council , it is recommende d that the term “ councilman” be replace d with “council
member.” This change will encompass all gende rs and promote a more inclusive and equitable environment. Updating the terminology is a sim ple yet significant step towards acknowledging and respecting the c ontributions of all individuals, regardless of gender, who serve on the C
ity Council. By making this a mendment, we align our Municipal C ode with contemporary values and pr
actices, fostering a more welcoming and representative local government.
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal implications at this time.
Respectfully submitted by:
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina
1 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA AMENDING TITLE 2 (ZONING CODE) OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFYING TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL) TO UPDATE TERMINOLOGY IN MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR INCLUSIVITY: REPLACING 'COUNCILMAN' WITH 'COUNCILMEMBER’
WHEREAS, the Marina Municipal Code, Title 2, Administration and Personnel, currently uses the term "councilman" in Chapters 2.04 (City Council) and 2.08 (City Manager). These sections of the code have remained unchanged since 1975, reflecting an outdated and non -inclusive terminology that fails to represent the diverse composition of our community and modern -day governance; and
WHEREAS, to ensure that the language within our Municipal Code accurately reflects the diversity and inclusivity of our City Council, it is recommended that the term "councilman" be replaced with "councilmember"; and
WHEREAS, this change will encompass all genders and promote a more inclusive and equitable environment ; up dating the terminology is a simple yet significant step towards acknowledging and respecting the contributions of all individuals, regardless of gender, who serve on the City Council; and
WHEREAS, by making this amendment, we align our municipal code with contemporary values and practices, fostering a more welcoming and representative local government;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings.
The City Council finds and determines the recitals set forth above to be true and correct and by this reference, incorporates the same herein as findings.
Section 2. Title 2, Administration and Personnel, of the Marina City Code is hereby amended to read as follows. Deleted items will be double-stricken; amended or inserted items will be underlined and in red.
Chapter 2.04 CITY COUNCIL
2.04.010 Meetings—Time.
The regular meetings of the city council shall be held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month convening at the hour of five p.m. if there is a closed session and convening in open session at six-thirty p.m. The time and date of coucil council meetings may be set by resolution adopted by the council. (Ord. 2024-01 § 2, 2024; Ord. 2001-11 § 1, 2001; Ord. 78-12 § 1, 1978; Ord. 75-2 § 1, 1975)
2.04.020 Meetings—Place.
The regular meetings of the city council shall be held at the Marina Community Center, 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, California. (Ord. 75-2 § 2, 1975) 2 2.04.030 Expenses—Reimbursement by city—Furnishing information.
A city councilman councilmember who intends to attend a convention, conference or meeting, or who is required to attend to city business in the discharge of his work, shall file with the city manager, on a form provided by the city, the following information: the date, the place and an itemized estimated expense statement and an estimated statement of any other expenditure believed to be necessary in connection with the business. A councilman councilmember may apply for expenses only in connection with the business. A councilman councilmember may apply for expenses only in connection with a meeting of expenses authorized in the annual budget.
Expenses in connection with a meeting of city business not authorized in the budget may be reimbursed only after approval by the city council. (Ord. 75-9 § 1, 1975)
2.04.040 Expenses—Advances.
A. A city councilman councilmember may apply for and receive an advance of funds against his contemplated expenses upon approval by the city manager. Upon the councilman’s councilmember’s return to the city, he shall give a general itemized statement of expenditures.
B. The city manager may determine a per diem rate, and if he does so, the per diem rate shall include all expenses except transportation and registration for a convention. If the city manager fixes a per diem rate, a councilman councilmember attending upon city business is not entitled to any reimbursement or payment in excess of the per diem rate, except for transportation and registration and a convention and it is not necessary to submit an itemized statement of expenditures.
C. The city manager is authorized to prepare the forms he considers necessary in order to administer this chapter. (Ord. 75-9 § 2, 1975)
2.04.050 Expenses—City manager may grant exceptions.
The city manager may grant an exception or a variation to the requirements of this chapter when, in his judgment, an exception or variation is necessary, having in mind the economy of the city.
The city council shall confirm each exception or variation granted by the city manager. (Ord. 75-9 § 3, 1975)
3 Chapter 2.08 CITY MANAGER
2.08.010 Office created.
The office of the city manager is created. The city council shall appoint the city manager and shall make the appointment wholly on the basis of his administrative and executive ability and qualifications. The city manager shall hold office at the pleasure of the city council. (Ord. 75-8 § 1, 1975)
2.08.030 Eligibility.
A member of the city council is not eligible for appointment as city manager until one year elapses after the councilmember ceases to be a member of the council. (Ord. 75-8 § 3, 1975)
2.08.040 Bond.
The city manager shall furnish a corporate surety bond approved by the city council in such sum the city council determines. The bond shall be conditioned upon the faithful performance of the duties imposed upon the city manager. The premium for the bond is a proper charge against the city. (Ord. 75-8 § 4, 1975)
2.08.050 Assistant city manager—Acting city manager.
The city council may also appoint an assistant city manager to serve as acting city manager during the temporary absence or disability of the city manager. If there is no assistant city manager, the city manager shall designate a qualified city employee to exercise the powers and perform the duties of city manager during his temporary absence or disability by filing a written notice with the city clerk or the deputy or assistant city clerk. If the city manager’s absence or disability extends over a two-month period, the city council may appoint an acting city manager. (Ord. 75-8 § 5, 1975)
2.08.060 Compensation.
A. The city manager shall receive such compensation as the city council may determine from time to time.
B. The city manager shall be reimbursed for all actual and necessary expenses incurred by him in the performance of his official duties.
C. On termination of employment of the city manager by involuntary removal from service other than for wilful misconduct in office, the city manager shall receive cash severance pay in the lump sum equal to one month’s pay for every year of continuous service or fraction as city manager, up to a total of four months’ pay. The severance pay is computed at the highest salary received by the city manager during his service with the city. Involuntary removal from service shall include reduction in pay not applicable to all employees of the city. (Ord. 75-8 § 6, 1975)
2.08.070 Powers and duties.
The city manager is the administrative head of the government of the city, subject to the direction and control of the city council. He is responsible for the efficient administration of all the affairs of the city which are under his control. In addition to his general powers as administrative head, and not as a limitation on them, the city manager shall:
A. Enforce the laws and ordinances of the city and see that the franchises, contracts, permits and privileges granted by the council are faithfully observed; 4 B. Control, order and give directions to all heads of departments and to subordinate officers and employees of the city who are subject to removal by him; C. Appoint, remove, promote and demote each officer and employee of the city, excepting the city attorney, subject to personnel ordinances, rules and regulations; D. Conduct studies and effect such administrative reorganization of offices, positions and units under his direction as are in the interest of efficient, effective and economical conduct of the city’s business;
E. Recommend to the council for adoption such measures and ordinances as he considers necessary;
F. Attend all meetings of the council unless he is excused by the mayor individually or the council, except when his removal is under consideration; G. Keep the council advised at all times as to the financial condition and needs of the city; H. Prepare and submit the proposed annual budget and the proposed salary plan to the council for its approval;
I. See that no expenditures are submitted or recommended to the council except on approval of the city manager or his authorized representative. The city manager or his authorized representative is responsible for the purchase of all supplies for all the departments and divisions of the city;
J. Make investigations into the affairs of the city and each department and division of it and each contract and its proper performance by the city. The city manager shall investigate all complaints of matters concerning the administration of the city government and of the service maintained by public utilities in the city;
K. Exercise general supervision over all public buildings, public parks, and all other public property under the control and jurisdiction of the council; L. Perform such other duties and exercise such other powers as the city council may delegate to him from time to time. (Ord. 96-25 § 1(2), 1996; Ord. 75-8 § 7, 1975)
2.08.080 Council-manager relations.
Each member of the city council shall deal with the administrative services of the city through the city manager, except for the purpose of inquiry. Neither the council nor a member of the council shall give orders or instructions to subordinates of the city manager. The city manager shall take his orders and instructions from the council only when the council is sitting in a duly convened meeting and no individual councilman councilmember shall give orders or instructions to the city manager. (Ord. 75-8 § 8, 1975)
2.08.090 Departmental cooperation.
Each subordinate officer and the city clerk, city treasurer and the city attorney shall assist the city manager in administering the affairs of the city efficiently, economically and harmoniously. (Ord. 75-8 § 9, 1975)
5 2.08.100 Attendance at commission meetings.
The city manager may, and upon request of the city council shall, attend meetings of the planning commission and other commissions, boards and committees created by the council. At these meetings which the city manager attends, boards or committees shall hear the city manager upon matters which he wishes to address the members, and he shall inform the members as to the status of matters being considered by the council. He shall cooperate to the fullest extent with the members of each commission, board and committee appointed by the council. (Ord. 75-8 § 10, 1975)
2.08.110 Removal—Council vote—Notice.
The city manager may be removed only by a majority vote of the whole city council, as then constituted, convened in a regular council meeting, subject to Sections 2.08.120 through 2.08.150 of this chapter. In case of his removal by the council, the council shall furnish the city manager with a written notice stating the council’s intention to remove him at least thirty days before the effective date of his removal. If the city manager so requests, the council shall provide in writing reasons for the intended removal. The council shall provide the city manager with these written reasons within seven days after the receipt of a request from the city manager. The city manager shall make his request for the reasons in writing at least fifteen days before the effective date of his removal. (Ord. 75-8 § 11, 1975)
2.08.120 Removal—Hearing.
Within seven days after the delivery to the city manager of the notice of intention to remove, the city manager may request a hearing before the council by filing written notice with the city clerk or deputy or assistant city clerk. Thereafter, the council shall fix a time for the hearing. The council shall hold the hearing at its usual meeting place, before the effective date of the intended removal. At the hearing the city manager may appear and be heard with or without counsel. The purpose of the hearing is to allow the city manager to present to the council his grounds of opposition to his removal before the council acts. (Ord. 75-8 § 12, 1975)
2.08.130 Removal—Suspension pending hearing.
After furnishing the city manager with written notice of intended removal, the council may suspend him from duty, but his compensation continues until the effective date of his removal by action of the council taken after the hearing referred to in Section 2.08.120 of this chapter. (Ord. 75-8 § 13, 1975)
2.08.140 Removal—Discretion of council.
In removing the city manager, the council has absolute discretion and its action is final and conclusive and does not depend upon any particular showing or degree of proof at the hearing. (Ord. 75-8 § 14, 1975)
2.08.150 Removal—Limitations.
Notwithstanding Sections 2.08.110 through 2.08.140, the city manager may not be removed from office, other than for misconduct in office, during the period of one hundred eighty days following: 1) a general municipal election held in the city at which a member of the city council is elected, or 2) the time when a new city councilman councilmember is appointed. The purpose of this section is to allow each newly elected or appointed member of the council or a reorganized 6 June 28, 2024 Item No. 13a
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 2, 2024
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 24-,
APPROVING RECOMMENDED UPDATES TO THE MONTEREY
PENINSULA REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT REPORT FOR LOCKE-PADDON WETLAND PARK
REQUEST:
It is requested that the City Council consider:
1. Receive a report regarding recommended updates to the Monterey Peninsula Region Park District Master Plan and Design Development Report for Locke -Paddon Wetland Park and provide direction to the City Manager.
BACKGROUND:
Locke-Paddon Park is a unique and prominent park located on the northwest corner of Reservation Road & Del Monte Boulevard adjacent to the downtown center of Marina . The Park is primarily owned by the Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District (MPRPD ); however, the City of Marina also own certain parcels.
In 1987, the City of Marina entered into a lease agreement with MPRPD to preserve, improve and enhance certain wetlands located in the City of Marina in accordance with the Wetlands Enhancement Plan previously adopted by the City. As a condition of the lease agreement between the City and the District, the City agreed to, at its costs, “….maintain in good condition, all portions of the premises, including, without limitation, all Tenant’s (City) personal property.
Over time, the City has had limited success at both maintaining and making the type and quality of improvements to Locke-Paddon Park, while the Park continues to be an important asset for both the City and the District . In 2004 a Locke -Paddon Improvement Committee was established consisting of MPRPD staff, Marina City staff, members of the City’s Recreation and Cultural Services Commission and residents from the City of Marina . The goal of the committee was to improve the current conditions of the Locke -Paddon Park and Wetlands area allowing for enhanced educational and recreational opportunities. The Committee worked with the Park District with the development and coordination of the Park Master Plan . The City of Marina also contributed $15,000 towards the development of the Master Plan. The Master Plan was to define the reasonable improvements desired by the community, coordinated with the interested regulatory agencies and the prioritization for future improvement phases.
In 2005, the MPRPD adopted a Master Plan and Development Report for Locke -Paddon Wetland Park ( EXHIBIT A ). The purpose of the Plan is to establish a concept plan that depicts the recommended development of a specific site and/or special facility and to establish a realistic phasing program that fulfills primary needs and is as consistent as possible with financing resources. The Plan was to allow citizens, administrators, board members, and elected officials to participate effectively in the decisions on scope, function, priorities, and design concepts. (EXHIBIT B) is a graphic concept of the Locke-Paddon Wetland Park Final Master Plan.
1 Over the past twenty years, this Master Plan has guided the design and development of the park. The map shows the park was intended to serve a variety of recreation and educational needs for the greater Marina community. An essential feature of the park is the existing wetland pond, and it was planned to remain as is in the park design . Other key features of the park were the existing large Monterey Cypress trees and a large bright orange radio tower.
Some, but not all of the features envisioned in the final Master Plan map include:
• Recreation areas with volleyball, bocce ball and horseshoes • Future Marina library
• A head pond and recirculating stream connecting to the wetland ponds. • Meandering bike and foot paths
• Large picnic shelter, benches, picnic areas, tables, and BBQ • Play area with structured play equipment.
• Interpretive and educational areas
• Parking areas
• Restrooms
• Elevated or floating decks to provide pedestrian access across the lake. • Landscaping and planting areas that include turf areas and plantings that reflect indigenous plants of the area.
ANALYSIS:
While the development of the park has not occurred as quickly as expected, some significant development has happened including:
• The Marina community library with parking lot was built. • A playground area with tables was included with the library project. • A large radio tower was removed.
• Martin Luther King Sculpture garden was built.
• Oak woodland, community garden, food forest, and pollinator gardens are currently being developed.
• Habitat restoration area behind library
• 3.5-acre habitat mitigation area for Holiday Inn Express designated
Future Development
Community/Civic Center
In 2000, the City of Marina adopted an updated General. Included in this Plan is the identification of potential community/civic center sites . One of the primary goals of the General Plan is to bring together civic, commercial, cultural, and recreational uses to create a center or centers, to serve as a focus for community life and source of community identity in Marina. Three possible locations were identified in Marina which included Locke-Paddon Park/Marina Landing Site. “One candidate site is along Seaside Circle. This site is adjoined by Locke -Paddon Park and on the other by the Marina Landing Shopping Center. This site has the advantage of being located along the Reservation Road entrance to the City . Although the site has been primarily planned to accommodate a larger library for Marina, there may be an opportunity to add other civic facilities such as city offices and integrate them all with park and retail facilities.”
While no final decision has been made by the City on whether to develop civic or community facilities on the site, the site is proposed to be included as a site or facility since it has been part of the Marina General Plan for the past twenty-four years. The development of these types of facilities adjacent to the existing library are consistent with the Master Plan and Design Development Report.
2 Oak woodland, community garden, food forest area
This area continues to improve and develop through the extensive involvement of community volunteers, citizens for sustainable marina, and CSUMB students. Pathways, interpretive panels, drip irrigation, pollinator gardens, earth day celebrations, dune restoration area, community food, native plant, compost bins, murals, and oak woodland restoration are just some of the types of projects that will continue to development and expand in this area next to the library.
Pond Maintenance Plan
In 2012 the City completed an Implementation Plan for the management of Locke -Paddon wetland pond. The plan developed guidelines to help the City and the Park District in management and enhancement of both the pond and park . Nothing has been done since the completion of the report.
However, in the current budget the Council has approved $100,000 to hire a consultant to develop a specific maintenance plan and measures to start the management , maintenance, and enhancement of the pond and park.
Asian Garden
A couple years ago, the City Council allocated $250,000 to start the development of an Asian Garden in Locke-Paddon Park. The intent of this park is to bring the Marina community together and celebrate the multiculturalism in American and the diverse Asian community in Marina . The selection of this site for the Asian Garden is for multiple reasons, including the existing water features of the park, the already planned head pond and recirculating stream . It is also in a central location and next to Marina’s downtown district and complements the library and other features of the park . It can serve as a gathering place for both residents of the city, community members of our neighbor cities as well as bring in tourist to our downtown area.
The Asian Communities of Marina (ACOM) has been involved in developing the concept for this plan. Many trips have been made to the Shinzen Garden and the Ume Garden in Fresno, California .
Paul Saito, the landscape artist who originally designed the Shinzen Garden is helping to create a concept design plan. The garden itself would take up about an acre of space.
Habitat Mitigation Area for Holiday Inn Express
Approximately a 3.5-acre parcel in the park was established as an offsite mitigation for the development of the Holiday Inn Express hotel. Over the years, the management and maintenance of this area has not happened. This is another future project that needs to be developed.
Site Location
The potential site for the community/civic center would be adjacent to the library and in the open space area closer to Seaside Circle.
The site for the Asian Garden could be in several locations closer to the wetland pond area dependent on the habitat mitigation area if it is restored in the original planned area or relocated elsewhere in the park.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No financial request at this time . Additional General Fund monies will need to be allocated for implementing the maintenance and management plan for the pond.
Park impact fees can be used for development of park amenities in the park.
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina
3 Final
MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT REPORT
LOCKE-PADDON WETLAND PARK
Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District
Prepared by:
purkisszrose-rsi
August 2005
EXHIBIT A
4 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
Page Number
Authority 1
Purpose 1
Vicinity Map 2
Background 3
Methodology 4
Site Description 5
Concept Plan 6
Development Concept 7
Possible Environmental Impacts 13
Cost Analysis 15
Opinion of Probable Cost 16
Maintenance Program 17
Appendix 18
Meeting Minutes for 11/4/04
Sign-In Sheet for 11/4/04
Meeting Minutes for 1/18/05
Concept A Drawing
Concept B Drawing
Landscape Maintenance Specifications
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
5 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Authority
On September 16, 2004, the Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District entered into agreement with Purkiss-Rose-RSI to furnish park planning and landscape architectu ral services for the enlargement and enhancement of Locke-Paddon Wetland Park in the City of Marina. This service involved the pr eparation of a Master Plan and a Design Development Report for this park site.
Purpose
The Design Development Report (DDR) is an association of planning functions composed specifically to meet the needs of the public agency in processing the initial de sign of a park area or special facility. Its purpose is to establis h a concept plan that depicts the recommended development of a specif ic site and/or special facility and to establish a realistic phas ing program that fulfills primary needs and is as consistent as possible with financing resources.
The plan is prepared in a graphi c form that allows the citizen, administrator, board member and elected official to participate effectively in the decisions on scop e, function, priorities, and design concepts. The Design Development Report presents concepts of use; describes functional aspects of the design; investigates methods of implementation; describes potent ial environmenta l impacts; and promotes community understanding and support for the program.
Locke-Paddon Park
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
6 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park
EXHIBIT A
7 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Background
The town of Marina was laid out in 1913 by William Locke-Paddon after he purchased 1500 acres from the David Jacks family of Monterey notoriety. Mr. Locke-Paddon was a very successful real estate speculator that specialized in buying small family farms throughout Northern California and then subdividing and marketing them as “Locke-Paddon Colonies.”
The large tract of coastal prairie that he purchased from the Jacks family was subdivided into 300 five acre parcels that sold for $75 each. To help “sell” Marina, Mr. Locke-Paddon persuaded the Southern Pacific Railroad to put in a “flag-stop” to accommodate travelers, and prospective buyers, from the San Francisco area. The town was incorporated in 1975 and soon after began looking for projects to enhance the City’s character.
The Park District was also recently formed (1972) and was actively seeking cooperative open space proj ects within peninsula cities. A very noticeable characteristic of th e City was its six vernal ponds. In 1986 a partnership was created betw een the Regional Park District, the City and the Coastal Conservancy to acquire the lands around KIDD pond – so named for the tall towers owned by the station of the same called letters.
Prior to any acquisitions, a pond enhancement plan was adopted which gave direction for the pond’s future development and protection. Once adopted, the Distric t’s first purchase was the 12 acre Walton/KIDD parcel. By 1991 five of the six parcels were publicly owned and the park was dedicated as Locke-Paddon Wetland Community Park in honor of the City’s founder. The City also approved plans for a much needed lib rary in the park. Acquisition of the last remaining private parcel, known as the Isakson Property has recently been completed. This effort which will complete a long 15 year effort that will also begin the final phase of its original goal – its enhancement and restoration as critical coastal wetland habitat.
In 1994 a comprehensive Vernal Pond Management Plan was adopted by the City that reaffirmed the unique wetland nature of the park as wildlife habitat.
Pond south end of project
Newly acquired Isakson property
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
8 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Methodology
The provision of park and recreation facilities is a people-oriented program and successful implementation requires public support an d involvement. Obviously, decisions cannot always meet the specific desires of all segments of the community. The basic nature of public recreation recognizes that people have varied interests and sk ills involving a wide spectrum of activities. Since the primar y purpose of local parks is to accommodate many of these activities, it is incumbent on government to mitigate, as much as possible, all possible impacts on the site.
In an effort to generate public input and to ally the Locke-Paddon Wetland Park community with the overall recreation needs, a number of meetings were held. The first meeting was held on November 8 th, 2004, at the Monterey Peninsula Region al Park District office and included representatives of the City, Locke-Paddon Im provement Committee, and other stakeholders.
A brief history of the park site was described as well as the recreational needs/deficiencies that face the Park. Based on recommendations iden tified in the two previously adopted pond plans and input from the meeting, two conceptual Master Plans were developed and prepared.
The second meeting for community input was on January 19 th, 2005, at the adjacent Holiday Inn Express conference room. Again, the project background was described with the two conceptual Master Plans propos als. The audience was divided into separate tables where participants expressed their concerns and ideas, which were noted.
The consensus was that conceptual Master Plan B, with some revisions, seemed to best meet community needs. From conceptual Master Pl an B a proposed final Master Plan was developed for the Park District’s approval.
A draft Master Plan was presented to the Monterey Regional Park District Board at their June 13, 2005, Board Meeting at Marina City Hall. Th ere were some minor adjustments suggested by the Board. The public input expressed by attendees was supportive of the Master Plan.
Ongoing maintenance responsibilities were a concern voiced by the public and Board members.
The draft Master Plan and Design Development Report was transmitted to the City of Marina Council members and presented for their inform ation and input at their public meeting on July 19, 2005.
The final Master Plan and Design Development Report was presented to the MPRPD Board of Directors at their August 1, 2005 meeting.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
9 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Site Description
Locke-Paddon Wetland Park is located on the northwest corner of Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard in the City of Marina.
The prominent site has a gradual elevation rise to the north to Seaside Circle. The site is bordered to the east by Del Monte Boulevard and the Southern Pacific Railroad line right-of-way, the south and west by Reservation Road, and the north by Seaside Avenue. The 23-acre park has been recently expanded on its east border by the acquisition of an additional 10 acres along the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way.
There is significant vegetation within the site. Large Monterey Cypress provided a windscreen to the newly acquired property.
Existing Park improvements have brought forth new landscape areas, including trees, shrubs and irrigation. A large mitigation area is centrally located in the park. A small constructed amphitheater, concrete picnic benches, trash receptacles are found throughout the park. A restroom facility is located on the northwest corner of the site near the intersection of Seaside Circle and Reservation Road.
The major feature of the park is the existing wetland pond at the toe of the gradual grassland slopes, wh ich is freshwater and perennial.
Water levels are maintained in winter through inflows of storm and groundwater. The pond is shallow with very little topographic variation, this results in a low dive rsity of vegetation and wildlife habitat types within and adjacent to the pond. The pond catches run off from the near-by shopping ce nter on Reservation Road, which attributes to the pond’s less than desirable water quality.
A major concern within the park includes the control of homeless encampments on the corner of Del Monte Blvd. and Reservation Rd. in the willow understory. The large population of domestic geese and ducks within the pond has conc erned the community and visitors with their aggressiveness, foul sme ll, and negative impact on water quality.
Isakson Property
Existing Improvements
Homeless camp at Northeast end of site
Future Library Site
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
10 EXHIBIT A
11 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Development Concept
Design Overview
As a community park, Locke-Paddon Wetland Park is intended to serve a variety of recreation and educational needs associated with the greater Marina community. In developing the Master Plan for the park, there were several existing uses and conditions that affected the final design of the Master Plan.
One of the biggest constraints of the Park are the two existing radio towers. Although they can be a very good landmark for locating the park while driving on near-by High way 1, their subsurface impact on park development is significant. Any improvements within a 300’ radius of the towers must be above grade, due to the sub-surface grounding wires of the towers. Pr oposed improvements, including the library, have stayed clear of the grounding wires.
Existing Park improvements at the corner of Reservation Road and Seaside Avenue will remain as part of the Master Plan design, which include the restroom building and terraced landscape border. The 18- space parking lot will also remain to conveniently accommodate park visitors to the site.
The existing pond is essential to the park and is retained in the Master Plan as is . A suggestion would be for the pond to have an aeration system added, which can be implemented with the addition of artificial streams with head ponds. Habitat recommendations include removal of non-indigenous plant species and the thinning of the overgrown willows on the easter n end of the pond to help keep that portion of the park open, and thinning of the overgrowth and encroachment of cattails within the pond.
Library
The future home of the City of Marina Library is adjacent to the park site at the end of Seaside Avenue. Every effort will be made to integrate the development of the lib rary with the surrounding park.
Coordination will be vital in the planning for the park and library.
Radio Towers
Existing Improvements
Library and parking
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
12 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Open Play Areas
The recently acquired 10-acre prop erty provides an opportunity for new open space play areas. It is proposed that the area be bermed to provide a visual and sound buffer from the proposed visitor rail service project planned for the abandoned Union Pacific railroad right-of-way. The berm could also act as an informal amphitheater for an outdoor performance area. Improvements to this area could also include irregular groupings of trees as well as keeping most of the remaining Monterey Cypress trees, which currently form a visual landscape screen and separates th e new 10-acre property from the rest of the park. A drop-off area will provide two convenient accessible parking stalls for visitors with special needs and provide a drop-off location for the large picnic shelter area.
Large Picnic Shelter
A large group picnic shelter is pr oposed in the open play area.
Improvements may include a concrete slab under the shelter to house picnic tables, large barbeque grills and sinks. The large berm around the shelter will act as a wind brea k. A large informal grouping of trees surrounding the shelter will provide a sense of enclosure from the surrounding play area.
Lake, Pond and Streams
The Lake is recommended to remain “as is”, with some minor clean- up, removal of exotic plant species and thinning of willows and cattails. Two re-circulating streams and head ponds are included in the proposed park design for a number of reasons. They will not only take advantage of the natural gr ade changes and water collection aspect of the site, but they will ad d interest and another educational habitat type to the park. They will also provide an aeration system for the pond, which will have a benefici al effect on the currently high bacteria count. The stream sources will begin at the two head ponds as proposed for the recently acquired 10-acre property. They are directed toward the lake via cons tructed, lined streambeds that meander south along internal path ways into the lake, and allowing for the possibility of riffling casc ades. The existing and proposed pedestrian trails will be bridged at the streams crossings. To further enhance the educational and habitat character of the proposed streams, it is suggested that they be bordered with typical riparian trees, shrubs and perennials. Research and related materials would also be found at the library to provide a cooperative educational experience to all park visitors.
Picnic/open play area w/ pavilion
Large Head Pond & Stream/Riparian Habitat.
EXHIBIT A
13 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Play Areas
Two passive play areas are proposed on the site; one associated with the group picnic area on the recent ly acquired 10-acre property; the other overlooking the head pond near the Library building to the north of the site. Both are conveniently located near activity areas and are accessible by walkways, which tie into the overall circulation system of the park. Both play area s are defined by a concrete curb, which contains rubberized surfacing or wood chips and acts as a mow strip for maintenance ease.
Play equipment is recommended to include modern state-of-the-art play structures with slides, ladders , bridges, transitions, lookout platforms, balance beams, climbing apparatuses, and various play panels. Improvements will be designed for ADA compliant access.
Large Informal Amphitheater
The grass slope and berming in the open play area on the east side of the park along the railroad right-of-way is intended to act as a sound and visual buffer and as an informal amphitheater for community events. A stage area is recommended for the foot of the slope and would be back-dropped by the lake.
Trails and foot paths
A 10’ wide ADA
compliant bike
path will replace
the existing path
along the south-
west perimeter of
the lake and
connect the
existing Monterey Bay Coastal Tra il along Del Monte Boulevard with the existing parking area on Se aside Avenue. The path will also connect with other existing and proposed trails to provide access around the complete perimeter of the lake. It is also suggested that the trail system be enhanced with benches, trash receptacles, interpretive displays, and
exercise stations. Thinning of the
willow trees on the southern edge of lake will create an opportunity to provide an observation deck to view the lake. The observation deck could incorporate a seating area and trash receptacles. Two other observational platforms are suggested for the northern part of the lake and co uld include benches, interpretive panels, and trash receptacles. In addition to concrete walks, there may be opportunities for elevated or floating decks to provide pedestrian access over high water areas or across the lake. In considering these deck systems, there are agency concerns regarding
Tot lot near Library
Informal Amphitheater
Southern Park entry
Trails adjacent to Reservation Road
________
EXHIBIT A
14 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
construction costs, maintenance requirements, habitat impact, as well as safety and liability. These access options will be further considered during design development when more specific topographic and drainage information is available. All other existing and proposed trails are recommended to be ADA compliant with a medium broom finished concrete surface.
Signage
An elevated new park sign is recommended at the corner of Reservation Road and Del Monte Blvd. The new identification signage should incorporate recycl ed materials. Directional signage and facility identification signs ar e recommended where necessary to direct park users to the appropriat e parking and activity areas. Signs should also identify the restroom facilities and handicapped parking spaces, where applicable. Interpretive kiosks, panel displays, and signage should be placed adjacent to the walkways and at interpretive/education areas for effective use.
Interpretive Educational Area
A large portion of the existing park site is recommended as an interpretive education area with a series of ADA compliant trials looping throughout the park. The intent of the interpretive area is to provide environmental education opportunities to park visitors. Each area will be defined by the tra il system. These educational areas should primarily consist of plan t communities indigenous to the Marina site and, where appropria te and useful for environmental educational purposes, to
Monterey County. The area
includes the existing
amphitheater with suggested
minor aesthetic changes, and
the existing Holiday Inn
Express mitigation area. The
individual picnic tables and
trash receptacles scattered
along the edge of these trails
should be consolidated and
located in the passive play area of the recently acquired 10-acre property. Concrete slabs are recomm ended under tables to minimize maintenance requirements. Turn-out areas with rock features along the trails can provide a resting place as well as a chance for informal interpretive and social interaction without obstructing walkers.
Existing Park Signage
Existing Amphitheater
Interpretive turn-out with rock outcropping
Existing Mitigation Area
EXHIBIT A
15 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Landscaping
Proposed planting is intended to define and buffer the activity areas from each other. Plantings can be us ed to direct views and circulation through the park site. In proposed turf areas trees should be located at least 20 feet apart to allow efficient mowing with large mowers.
Concrete mow strips should be used to delineate between turf and planting areas for maintenance ease. Plant species should be selected to reflect the indigenous plants of the area and to minimize maintenance requirements. Trees are recommended to provide wind deflection in activity areas. To pres erve existing trees that are notable specimens, pruning, thinning, an d removal should be done under direction of a certified arborist.
It is recommended that the entire site be covered by an automatic sprinkler system designed to provide adequate irrigation for the different types of landscape planting. Low precipitation heads should be used to minimize water runoff, particularly in steep areas.
Rotary type sprinklers could be used in the proposed large maintained turf areas. Impact type sprinklers are appropriate in areas where groundcover planting is proposed. Elevated heads should be protected from damaged caused by users and maintenance equipment. In addition to low-volume heads, various water c o n s e r v a t i o n m e t h o d s s h o u l d b e u s e d t o m a x i m i z e e f f i c i e n c y o f t h e irrigation system.
Parking
The parking has been proposed as convenient to activity areas as possible. Access to all parking areas is off of Seaside Avenue only.
The parking area located near the group picnic area is for handicapped parking only. A drop-off has been incorporated in that area to provide access for loading and unloading equipment, supplies or visitors as needed. The road can also serve public safety and maintenance vehicle access to the play area. The existing parking area on the northwest can accommodate 17 cars and has a single accessible space. The remaining library pa rking area can accommodate an additional 62 cars and eight ADA accessible spaces. All parking areas are recommended to be composed of asphalt with striping, tree planting, curb and gutters, and accessible sidewalks and ramps.
EXHIBIT A
16 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Future Park Connections
With the proximity of Locke- Paddon Wetland Park to Vince Dimaggio Park, there was public in terest to provide a connection between these two facilities. The Union Pacific Rail line could be a major factor in this design if it is re-activated in the future. Though there is an existing sidewalk alon g the eastern side of Del Monte Boulevard and a crosswalk at Rese rvation Road, any future design considerations might include a pedestrian overpass linking the two parks.
Proposed connection to Dimaggio Park
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
17 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Possible Environmental Impacts
This preliminary evaluation of environmental conditions and possible impacts has been made without the benefit of thorough scientific assessments or testing techniques. These preliminary findings are based on visual inspection of the site; comparison with similar projects; and a working knowledge of the CEQA process. The prim ary intent is to identify critical impacts early in the design program so that solutio ns reflect both environmental concerns and functional criteria.
Aesthetics
The transition from vacant land to high quality landscaping recreational amenities not yet present in the community is direct, major an d extremely beneficial. The proposed park improvements will contribute to the recreational, social and aesthetic character of the City of Marina area as a whole, and will substantially improve the aesthetic quality of the immediate neighborhood.
Noise
Negative impacts are minimal. During construction there may be significant, though temporary, increases in noise levels. The new uses and intensities capable for this site based on the proposed new recreation improvements will increase current in ternal noise levels.
However, proposed plantings and berms within the site will significantly buffer new noise impacts by acting as an acoustical shield, part icularly when planted. The relatively low impact of the rest of the site should cause no sign ificant noise problems, no more than what is currently on the existing site. Control of co nstruction noise will be by enforcement of construction specifications and inspection. No ise generated from park maintenance equipment can be controlled by adequate muffler devices and work scheduling. Program scheduling will control organized activities and the noise they generate.
Light and glare
Any installed security lighting should be low profile and directed downward with a minimal amount of light spill or glare, and be an ener gy efficient, high intensity discharge type. The particular types should be selected for color and control of light distribution pattern.
Mitigation measures could include:
(1) shielding the light sources where necessary;
(2) controlling the lighting systems by timers for limited use; and (3) designing security lighting to a minima l level to eliminate dark spots in the park without glare.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
18 Locke- Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Traffic and Parking
The generation of additional traffic (vehicular , bicycle and pedestrian) will be experienced on the northern edge of the site along Seaside Av enue. No vehicular access is allowed anywhere on the site except at the entrances off Seaside Avenue. The amount and intensity of traffic will be primarily a function of the proposed new lib rary and secondarily related to the proposed park improvements but will need to be quantified nonetheless.
Water Usage
The park will be designed to conserve water re sources wherever possible. Native indigenous plant species are generally drought tolerant and the proposed turf area can be planted with a drought resistant grass. The irrigation system can be automatically controlled allowing specific water conserving adjustment in various areas (according to the plant species and particular microclimate). Low volume irrigation heads can reduce runoff, particularly on slopes. Rain and moisture sensors can also be used to monitor and control the irrigation system.
Water from the lake will be re-c irculated through the proposed stream system and should be considered to supply the irrigation system.
The existing water well on the newly acquired Isakson property will be investigated as a potential source of water for lake replenishment and irrigation.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
19 Locke-Paddon Wetlands Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Cost Analysis
The Design Development Report is a planning product that provides required information to establish a realistic program of im plementation. Not only does it determine an accurate scope of proposed development, it must also provide detailed estimates of construction costs.
Construction costs can be projected quite accura tely after the establishment of scope and the adoption of reasonable standards of development. Cost projections are based on tested costing information, including comparisons with similar projects or facilit ies that have been constructed during the past six month period. Estimates do not include future inflation factors and they must be updated according to schedule of accomplishment.
The attached Opinion of Probable Construction Cost table identifies typical costs associated with the types of development improvements contemplated in the plan for a park with the size and scope of development proposed for Locke-Paddon Wetlan d Park. The costs are significant because the plan is ambitious and has as an outcome a park th at will be highly attrac tive, easily accessible, user friendly, diverse in its micro-environments, and educationally provocative. It must also be noted that the park has seen very little improv ement or maintenance funding over its nearly 20- years of existence. The proposed recreational, landscape, and habitat improvements will create a high-caliber park that will be much used an d appreciated by the community as well as be a source of civic and agency pride as the landsc ape and uses mature. The investment may seem substantial but is typical of an urban open space park this size.
The costs are anticipated to be phased over time with the initial improv ements related to turf and landscape enhancements and recreational amen ities to improve the appearance of the park and attract more use by the community. Further phases will address a ccessibility and habitat enhancements as funds become available. By phasing the construction costs, there is the opportunity for capital campaigns that have specif ic goals and tangible items. Phasing also helps spread the costs over time and not encumber the Park District’s budget or the community’s ability to generate cost-sharing funds.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
20 Purkiss Rose-RSI
801 N. Harbor Blvd.
Fullerton, CA 92832
Tel. (714) 871-3638
Fax (714) 871-1188
Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District
NO.
EST.
QTY. UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT COST ITEM COST TOTAL
1 255,900 S.F. Site clearing and grubbing 0.05$ 12,795.00$ 2 255,900 S.F. Rough Grading 0.30$ 76,770.00$ 3 255,900 S.F. Finish Grading 0.15$ 38,385.00$ 4 54,745 S.F. Enhanced Mitigation Area 0.10$ 5,474.50$ 5 141,940 S.F. Interpretive Education Area 0.15$ 21,291.00$ 6 174,326 S.F. Lakeside 0.25$ 43,581.50$ 7 62,600 S.F. Asphalt concrete paving 2.50$ 156,500.00$ 8 91,095 S.F. Reinforced concrete paving 4.50$ 409,927.50$ 9 1,020 L.F. Concrete mowbands 15.00$ 15,300.00$ 10 1,315 L.F. Stream feature 100.00$ 131,500.00$ 11 1 L.S. Lakes/Ponds w/ liners & pump 125,000.00$ 125,000.00$ 12 7,820 S.F. Rubberized surfacing at Tot lot 14.00$ 109,480.00$ 13 1 L.S. Totlot w/ shade shelter 100,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 14 1 L.S. Large pavilion/shade shelter 45,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 15 1 L.S. Outdoor stage 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 16 1 L.S.
Site Amenities (Picnic tables,
BBQ's, Benches, Bike Rack, Trash
Recepticles, etc) 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$
17 5 EA. Foot bridges 7,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 18 418,550 S.F. Turf 0.50$ 209,275.00$ 19 165 EA. Trees 300.00$ 49,500.00$
20 560,490 S.F. Irrigation 0.15$ 84,073.50$ 21 1 L.S. Park wayfinding signage 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 22 1 L.S. Entry Monument signage 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 23 1 L.S. Large Pond Aeration system 45,000.00$ 45,000.00$ SUB-TOTAL 1,798,853.00$
10% CONTINGENCY 179,885.30$
TOTAL 1,978,738.30$
OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
Job Number:
Job Name:
Date:
Locke-Paddon Wetland Park
04-158
June 3, 2005
Purkiss Rose-RSI has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or the contractor's methods of determining costs. These opinions of probable costs represent our best judgement as design professionals familiar with the construction industry and public works contracts. Purkiss Rose-RSI cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or construction costs will not vary from our opinion of probable construction costs. Opinion of Probable Cost shall not be used as a bid form or for any bidding purposes.Rev. 02-24-04
EXHIBIT A
21 Locke-Paddon Wetland Park | Design Development Report ________________________________________________________________________________
Maintenance Program
The intent for the majority of this park is to maintain a more naturalistic character that fits and compliments the existing pond, existing vegetation and existing park amenities. The majority of the site is open space and is intended to be covered with drought tolerant and/or native plant materials that require minimal main tenance and moderate supplemental water.
Maintenance in the more naturalistic areas will involve periodic checking and adjustment of the irrigation system to insure adequate cove rage with the automatically controlled system; control of weeds and eradication of invasive ex otic species such as Kikuya and Bermuda grass and Castor Bean; and litter removal as necessary.
Tree trimming should be limited to removal of deadwood and thinning as necessary to promote a strong and balanced limb structure that can withstand the prevailing winds.
Similarly, shrub pruning will be minimal, with species selected that have low profiles and require little supplemental care.
The expansion area is intended to provide an open maintained turf area for more active informal play or gatherings associated with the library and group picnic shelter. The turf will be fescue type and will requir e regular weekly mowing, daily irrigation and supplemental periodic feeding.
The existing main pond will require litter removal as nece ssary and an annual removal of encroaching cat tails and willows to maintain open water and a definitive shoreline. Some removal of algae may be necessary depending on the success of the improved circulation and aeration enhancements that may be implemented.
The aeration and pumping system associated with the ponds water quality improvement program will require a regular maintenance inspecti on to insure that the system is properly working We would expect that this would be every two weeks or monthly as the particular site circumstances warrant.
Maintenance of the restroom, play area, picnic facilities, parking areas, trash receptacles and paths would be on a weekly basis similar to the maintenance schedule for any community park.
A sample maintenance specification has been included in the Appendix with detailed descriptions of maintenance services to be performed.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXHIBIT A
22 Appendix
EXHIBIT A
23 Purkiss Rose-RSI1
Purkiss Rose-RSI
801 N. Harbor Boulevard
Fullerton, CA 92832
Tel. (714) 871-3638
Fax (714) 871-1188
DATE November 8th, 2004
MEETING MINUTES:
PROJECT: Locke-Paddon Wetland Park, City of Marina
DATE OF
MEETING: November 4 th, 2004
LOCATION: Monterey Peninsula Re gional Park District Office PRESENT: See attached sign-in sheet
DISTRIBUTION: Tim Jenson, MPRPD
PURPOSE: Concerns and Constraints Meeting
JOB STATUS: Preliminary
Notes
S Library
- 28,000 sq. ft.- waiting for finalization agreement between County and City....almost enough money.
- Bus to route along street for drop off to Library
- Parking at Library could be below City of Marina standards. Possibilty? - Mitigation of Library to be address later?
S Connection to Dimaggio Park
- City would like to see a thought put into connecting Dimaggio Park and Locke- Paddon, possible pedestrian bridge over street and railroad tracks.
S Radio towers
- Water level to not exceed height of concrete platforms - No cutting near towers, ground wires. (See plans for radii around tower) Filling OK
S Pond
- Clay bottom of lake to not be penetrated. No drainage/percolation on pond. - Water/ drainage from adjacent streets (north) run into pond. No outlet in pond. - South end of pond typically floods out. 1" of rain could yield 6"-12" more elevation in pond.
EXHIBIT A
24 Purkiss Rose-RSI2
- Pond needs aeration - high bacteria count! No fountains or spraying. Possible solar pumps?
- Environment of pond!! Main focus. Trimming of Tule, aeration of pond. - According to Dept. of Fish and Game, fishing is legal on site. Possible catch and release program.
- Ducks a large problem of pollutants in pond. Discouragement of feeding of ducks.
S Stream
- Possible Stream from Library site to pond. Interpretive education? Stream habitat? Plant communities?
- Possible route from Library to existing “duck pond” to main pond - environmental studies on site by school kids, groups, or classes. Then head to library for study, materials, reports, and information.
S Amphitheater
- Needs podium/stage to be more viable resource for park - Currently only seats 60 people (maximum) & hardly ever used. - Possible integration of stream into Amphitheater area - Use it for library lectures/outdoor education
S Misc.
- Cutting of willows may have environmental impact on pond - Clear access from pond to Marina State Beach. (Signage?) - Group picnic area/s on site
- “Pier like” over looks on site for viewing of lake over water. - Site is cold and windy. Wind from the south. (State beach area) - Possible “green area” or open green space for large events and passive recreation - Public access from parking area for library. (School kids to north migrate in that direction to north of site.
- Indiscrete lighting at north end of pond.
- Public access at north end of pond
- Public access on Street is very bad (current condition) - Possible trail loop around pond
- Could be future light rail train on tracks
EXHIBIT A
25 Locke-Paddon wetland park 11/4/04
Name Agency/Company Phone Number
1 Robert Echavarria Purkiss-Rose-RSI (714)871-3638
2 Steve Lang Purkiss-Rose-RSI (714)871-3638
3 Gary Wilmot
Locke-Paddon
Improvement
Committee
(831)384-3361
4 Gary Cramblett City of Marina (831)884-1242
5 Charles Johnson City of Marina (831)884-1218
6 Lenore Masterson Library Commission (831)883-3968
7 Joe Donofrio MPRPD (831)372-3196 x4
8 Tim Jenson Monterey Co. Planng. (831)372-3196 x2
9 Bart Bruno MPD/MHIE (831)384-4081
EXHIBIT A
26 Purkiss Rose-RSI1
Purkiss Rose-RSI
801 N. Harbor Boulevard
Fullerton, CA 92832
Tel. (714) 871-3638
Fax (714) 871-1188
DATE January 26th , 2005
MEETING MINUTES:
PROJECT: Locke-Paddon Wetland Park
DATE OF
MEETING: January 18th, 2005
LOCATION: Holiday Inn Express - City of Marina - Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District
PRESENT: See attached sign-in sheet
DISTRIBUTION: Joe Donofrio, MPRPD
Tim Jenson, MPRPD
PURPOSE: Community Input Meeting
JOB STATUS: Preliminary
Notes
-
1.0 - Table 1 Input notes
1.1 - Marina Arts Council has initiated contact with the Monterey Bay Aquarium to plan for interpretive nature trails.
1.2 - Bikes on trails especially those near or connecting to existing bike paths.
1.3 - Placement of benches along trails. Possible “Memory Benches”
1.4 - Places to lock bikes, where they could be locked, if they are denied certain trail access, or at library entrance, etc.
1.5 - Ensure long term plan to avoid contamination of pond/lake/stream/nature areas from runoff of library and parking lots.
1.6 - Stage coach history - interpretive sites
1.7 - Long term funding for all facilities and nature areas
1.8 - Insectarium (only 1 in N. America) educate people to role of insects
1.9 - “Revolving”/changing exhibit areas
1.10 - Open Sky/Air Convention center - joint hotel use
1.11 - Support for litter pick-up & coordination with Marina Public Safety for homeless camp removal
1.12 - Sculpture garden, art in the park
EXHIBIT A
27 Purkiss Rose-RSI2
1.13 - Bronze plaque interpretive signage for plants & animals, links to Native American cultural history.
2.0 - Table 2 Input notes
2.1 - Park & library both used at same time - could be conflict for parking. Look at Marina Landing shopping center for shared parking.
2.2 - Is the Holiday Inn mitigation being “maintained”? Why is it brown and property unsightly?
2.3 - Loop trail good idea with fitness course links
2.4 - Pier style walkways going over some areas of the pond tying in to walkways but the boardwalk over the pond can be in smaller areas then currently designed.
2.5 - Like idea of aeration of pond - needs to be sustainable.
2.6 - Foul Fowls - look at study done by CSUMB student. Stop feeding ducks - use Lake El Estero as example.
2.7 - Water level/table needs to be studied to establish path elev ations and location of observation platforms.
2.8 - Long term stability of pathways relative to water levels & erosion
2.9 - ADA compliance to allow handicap accessibility
2.10 - Need to reduce intrusive aquatic plant material - look at indigenous plant communities in Moss Landing
2.11 - Consider link to Vince Dimaggio Park
2.12 - Build on interpretive plant identification by consideration of botanical garden/arboretum
2.13 - Expand trail loop to east side of railroad tracks linked to Tree Commissions tree planting.
2.14 - Wind - for outdoor use can be harsh
2.15 - Build on amphitheater/outdoor performance area in adjacent new land where there are no limits to the number of people
2.16 - Build on international/multi-cultural heritage of Marina using different languages in interpretive signage.
3.0 - Table 3 Input notes
3.1 - Negotiate to remove the towers - offer the tower leasees alternate options; see what it would cost to break the lease.
3.2 - Minimal invasiveness in wetland ( ie. Not “army corps of engineers)
3.3 - Repair and maintain wider path along Reservation Road and or ask City to have property owners across the street build sidewalks for large amount of pedestrian traffic.
3.4 - Replace unattractive and uncomfortable concrete picnic tables with wood.
3.5 - What can be done with the “weeds” and ugly rope fence around “mitigation” area? Get rid of fence, plant other native plants!
4.0 - Table 4 Input notes
4.1 - Parking and lighting near picnic
4.2 - Native botanical garden
4.3 - Replace existing bridge
4.4 - Need parking (not at library)
4.5 - Enhanced corner at Del Monte and Reservation Road
4.6 - Need some paved bicycle paths, loop trail around lake
4.7 - Stream good idea
EXHIBIT A
28 Purkiss Rose-RSI3
4.8 - Fishing? From overlooks and/or bridges
4.9 - Dog clean up bags
4.10 - Bus services
4.11 - A sense of place
4.12 - Dislike Library, cement in mitigation area, willows in lake, turf,
4.13 - more restrooms closer to amenities
4.14 - Maintenance building?
4.15 - Nighttime security lighting?
5.0 - Table 5 Input notes
5.1 - Cover existing amphitheater area
5.2 - Cut 8,000 sq. ft. off of library
5.3 - Combine interpretive center within the library
5.4 - Allow for Café type lease area on corner or within library - apply ½ cent sales tax for Master Plan area to provide funding for maintenance and/or library staffing.
5.5 - Make trails in Master Plan that would provide for and facilitate linkage of Locke Paddon Park trail to future pedestrian infrastructure outside the park
5.6 - add bicycle racks
5.7 - Lessen the structural emphasis (less Sq. Ft.) in library - Focus on park/open space as much as possible.
5.8 - Durability of improvements
5.9 - Explore shared parking agreements with nearby properties (i.e. courthouse)
5.10 - How much water is available? Long term costs and supply for irrigation and stream (quantity, pump costs, etc.)
5.11 - Short/long term impacts of improved areas onto wetlands. ( nitrates, invasive, foot traffic)
5.12 - Exercise stations along path
5.13 - Be mindful of graffiti
5.14 - Limit lighting - don’t make this Wal-mart -will too much lighting make it unfriendly for wildlife.
5.15 - Clear entrance to access points
EXHIBIT A
29 EXHIBIT A
30 EXHIBIT A
31 1
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
SECTION 02449
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS
EXHIBIT A
32 1
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
SECTION 02449 – LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
I. GENERAL
A. Scope of Work:
Notwithstanding the requirements of these specifications, it is the intent of this document to ensure that the
landscape, plant life, irrigation system and site be maintained in a healthy vigorous growth and well-groomed state at all times.
Contractor performance shall present a professional image, a high standard of quality and technical competence. The Contractor’s prime responsibility will be to integrate
innovative and progressive elements of high landscape maintenance standards and the objectives as set forth in the specification. The requirements and specifications of this document do not supersede any other applicable standards for public works contracts. Where there are differences, the more stringent shall apply, and the City shall be notified of any necessary changes to the specific operations and materials.
II. MATERIALS
All materials and subsequent change orders used shall conform to the specifications, or as approved in writing by the City. The original job specifications are available at the
City.
III. SUBMITTALS
A. As required by Law, the Contractor must submit to the County Agricultural Commissioner’s office, a monthly record of all Disease Control, Insecticides, Rodenticides and Herbicides used on the project.
B. Soils test shall be performed on an as needed basis. All soil sampling locations shall be approved by the City’s Representative, with results submitted to the City. Soils testing shall be done by an approved soils agronomic testing firm at the Contractor’s expense.
C. Any substituted products or equipment being used which do not conform to the original contract area working drawings, job specification or as specified herein shall be approved by the City in writing prior to use or installation.
IV. GENERAL MAINTENANCE CARE AND PROCEDURES
A. All necessary licenses, permits and/or approvals shall be obtained by the contractor from the City.
B. The Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, equipment, tools, office with telephone, equipment storage and service facilities.
C. The Contractor shall refer to the Special Conditions contained herein for Weekly
Maintenance Review procedures and Yearly Maintenance Scheduled Work Notification requirements.
V. Safety
All work performed under this contract shall be performed in such a manner as to provide maximum safety to the public and comply with all safety standards required by CAL-OSHA. The City reserves the right to issue restraint or cease and desist orders to the Contractor when unsafe or harmful acts are observed or reported relative to the performance of the work under this contract.
A. Reporting Safety Hazards, Damage or Malfunction:
EXHIBIT A
33 2
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
It shall be the Contractor’s responsibility to inspect daily all contract areas and identify any conditions(s) that renders any areas within this contract unsafe, as well as unsafe practices occurring thereon and report any deficiencies immediately to the City
Representative.
1. Notify the City immediately of any unusual and hazardous conditions in the contract area including, but not limited to, restroom plumbing, sewer backups, fallen branches,
or any item that creates a hazard or prevents the public’s use of the parks/facilities.
2. Notify City within one (1) hour of malfunctioning facilities or conditions that may break, malfunction or interrupt the public’s use of the parks/facilities.
3. All playground and sports equipment shall be inspected for vandalism, safety and serviceability daily.
4. Inspect all ha
rdscape playing surface areas for safety hazards, including tripping hazards, holes, or other conditions daily.
5. Contractor shall be responsible to report any unsafe conditions observed for all structures and fixtures, including but not limited to:
a. Light standards and fixtures
b.
Walls, fences, gates
c. Trash dumpsters
d. Signage
e. Graffiti
f. Buildings
g. Water Features
h. Play Areas
i. Volleyball nets and posts
B. Walks, Stairways, and Hardscape Areas:
Care shall be taken so that maintenance does not inhibit or endanger pedestrians utilizing walks, stairways, and hardscape areas. This work should be scheduled to coincide with
mowing or other landscape work in the area. Adequate safety procedures should be followed including signing and roping off areas as necessary. Should work be disrupting to the public or regular traffic flow, it shall be rescheduled to a more convenient time.
C. Work Site:
The Contractor shall maintain all contract areas free of hazards to persons and/or property resulting from their operations.
D. Street Closures, Detours, Barricades:
If work is to be conducted in the public right-of-way, the Contractor shall adhere to all safety rules, using cones, signboards, or other required safety equipment, and obtain all necessary permits and approvals per Work Area Traffic Control Handbook requirements (WATCH book).
If the Contractor fails to provide and install any of the signs or traffic control devices required hereby or ordered by the City staff, staff may cause such signs or traffic control devices to be placed by others, charge the costs therefore against the Contractor, and
deduct the same from the next progress payment.
EXHIBIT A
34 3
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
E. Safety Equipment:
All required and recommended safety devices for all power equipment shall be maintained at all times. Failure to maintain safety devices will result in the temporary interruption of work as directed by the City.
VI. PESTICIDE USE AND SAFETY
All materials
shall be in strict accordance and applied within the EPA regulations and the California Food and Agricultural Code.
A. General Requirements
The application of pesticides and other chemicals used on the contract areas shall be recorded and submitted monthly to the County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office and City.
Contractor shall be responsible for accurately maintaining all pesticide application records.
1. There shall be no application of a pesticide without approval by the City.
2. Application of all pesticides shall be only by a properly State Licensed Pest Control Operator.
3. Non-restricted chemicals shall be used whenever possible to perform pesticide control in landscape areas.
4. All restricted pesticides and/or chemicals to be used for pest control shall be approved by the City’s Representative prior to use. A written recommendation of the proposed restricted chemicals to be used shall be prepared by a licensed California Pest Control Advisor, and accompanied with a Notice of intent Form to apply restrict
ed/non-restricted materials. A written recommendation shall contain all specified information required for the application of restricted pesticides.
The Contractor shall pay for and obtain all recommendations.
B. Application of Pesticides
1. Timing: Pesticides shall be applied at times which limit the possibility of contamination from climatic or other factors and the proper life cycle of the
pests. Early morning application shall be used when possible to avoid contamination from drift. Applicator shall monitor forecast weather conditions to avoid making application prior to inclement weather to eliminate potential runoff of treated areas.
Irrigation water applied after treatment shall be reduced to eliminate runoff.
When water is required to increase pesticide efficiency, it shall be applied in quantities in which each area is capable of receiving without excessive runoff.
2. Handling of Pesticides: Care shall be taken in transferring and mixing pesticides to prevent contaminating areas outside the target area. Application methods shall be used
which ensure that materials are confined to the target area. Spray tanks containing leftover materials shall not be drained on the site to prevent any contamination. Disposal of pesticides and tank rinsing materials shall be within the guidelines established in the California Food and Agricultural Code or EPA Regulations.
3. Equipment and Methods: Spray equipment shall be in good operating condition, quality and designed to
efficiently apply materials to the target area. Drift will
EXHIBIT A
35 4
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
be minimized by avoiding high pressure applications and using water soluble drift agents.
4. Selection of Materials: Pesticides shall be selected from those materials which characteristically have the lowest residual persistence. Use of emulsifiable
concentrates shall be used when possible to limit windblown particles. The use of adjuvants will be to increase pesticide efficiency, thereby reducing the total amount of technical material required to gain control.
5. Substitutions: Wherever a specific type of material is specified, no substitutions shall be allowed without the written consent of the City’s Representative.
6. Certification of Materials: All materials shall be delivered on the site in original unopened containers. Materials shall be subject to inspection prior to mixing by the City’s Representative.
VII.
WEED CONTROL
The Contractor shall be responsible for providing a continuous weeding program for all contract areas. Weeding shall be on a weekly basis and shall include “any undesirable or misplaced plant”.
A. Turf:
The use of any chemicals for weed control shall be done by a State Licensed Pest Control Operator who shall follow all guidelines governing his license.
1. A continual chemical program shall be adopted for control of broadleaf and noxious weeds.
2. All chemicals shall be applied in accordance with regulations of State Agricultural Department.
3. Use extreme caution when using selective weed killers not to damage other plants.
4. During the months of March and September a broadleaf grass pre-emergent shall be applied to all turf areas (cool season grasses only).
5. City
approval must be obtained prior to spraying any herbicide and all spraying shall be done at a time when there is no wind. At first indication of Crabgrass infest
ation, spray affected areas with an approved spray. Apply Crabgrass killer only on cool days when lawns are in a moist condition. Removal of all weeds shall be a continuous program. Noxious weeds shall not be permitted to grow within the areas assigned as part of this contract, and shall be completely removed and bare turf areas re-sodded. Crabgrass shall not be allowed to become established in any landscape areas maintained by Contractor. Contractor shall apply a Crabgrass pre- emergence herbicide to all turf areas between January 15 th and February 15th.
B. Ground Cover:
Weeds shall be removed completely on a weekly basis, chemically or manually. Weeds may be controlled with pre-emergent herbicides, preferably, but may also be controlled with post- emergent herbicides, and/or by hand pulling.
All ground cover shall be inspected weekly for weed growth. Weeds shall not be allowed to remain growing for longer than one (1) week without complete removal to include roots,
rhizomes and stolons. Bermudagrass or other noxious weeds shall not be allowed to become established in any ground cover areas. Cultivating of ground cover areas shall be held to
EXHIBIT A
36 5
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
minimum and cultivated only as necessary to remove weeds. Excessive cultivation may result in root damage to ground covers and shrubs.
C. Trees:
All trees in ground cover areas shall have open soil maintained immediately around the base of the trunk. Keep this area free of weeds and avoid frequent soil cultivation which destroys shallow roots. Tree wells shall be free of weeds at all times.
D. Shrubs:
Weeds shall be removed from beds weekly, chemically or manually. Bermudagrass and other noxious weeds shall not be allowed to become established.
E. Walkways, Paved Surfaces and Hardscape Areas:
Contractor shall be responsible for controlling weeds by mechanical or chemical means,
growing in cracks, curb and gutter, or expansion joints and areas contiguous to the contract areas as required.
VIII. TURF CARE
Lawns shall be maintained to be in the healthiest growing condition possible. Supply the necessary services as follows:
A. Maintenance Schedules:
Scheduling of mowing and turf care maintenance time shall be submitted to the City for approval. Work schedules for mowing, aeration and dethatching operations shall be changed as determined by the City’s Representative to accommodate public use by various user groups and recreations activities.
B. Mowing:
Turf
in this
contract shall be mowed with power propelled mowers equipped to mow all collect clippings in one operation. Rotary movers shall be used to mow tall fescue or other cool-season turf areas. Reel mowers equipped with rollers will be required to mow Bermudagrass areas. The City’s Representative may in some instances allow mowing without the attached collection device, providing the machine is equipped with approved safety
features.
Labor and materials shall be provided by the Contractor for re-seeding or re-sodding to any failing turf areas as becomes necessary due to contractor neglect.
Care shall be exercised during the mowing operation to prevent damage to trees and other physical obstacles located within the turf areas. Do not mow wet areas. Alternate mowing patterns whenever possible to prevent wheel ruts. If ruts are made, Contractor will make repairs at his own expense.
All trash, litter and debris shall be removed from the landscape prior to mowing.
The Contractor shall not interfere with the public use of the premises and shall conduct its operations as to offer the least possible obstruction and inconvenience to the public or disruption to the peace and quiet of the areas within which the services are performed.
1. Cool Season Grass: Turf shall be mowed (maintained) with rotary type mowers at a height of three
inches (3”) during Spring, Summer and Fall. In the Winter turf areas shall be mowed at a height of two inches (2”). All turf areas shall be cut
EXHIBIT A
37 6
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
at a regular weekly intervals. The turf should never be cut more than one/third (1/3) of the top growth or approximately three-quarter inch (3/4”) at any one mowing. Avoid Scalping.
2. Open Turf Fields: Mow turf areas 52 weeks per year on a regular schedule to be approved by the City. The schedule shall provide that all turf areas will be mowed once per week. Mowing of turf at each park facility, shall be completed in one operation. Care should be given to mow without compactions of turf.
C. Edging and Trimming:
Turf edges adjacent to walks, curbs, paving mow strips, walls, fences, poles, valve boxes, buildings, shrub areas and other physical obstructions shall be trimmed weekly in the Spring,
Summer and Fall seasons and as needed for a neat appearance during the Winter months.
1. Grass shall be neatly trimmed away from sprinkler heads to ensure proper coverage and operation. Trim turf immediately adjacent to sprinkler heads, as directed by the City’s representative and under no circumstances remove an area larger than the head diameter. Trimming around sprinkler heads or cutouts in the turf area with an edger will not be permitted. Weed or turf killer shall not be used.
2. “Weed Eaters” or similar equipment shall not be used around trees or shrubs. All trimming or edging
around trees and shrubs shall be accomplished by spraying an eight inch (8”) minimum width not to exceed twelve inches (12”) maximum width area around the plant with an herbicide per manufacturer’s application rate.
D. Equipment Cleaning:
To help prevent contamination of turf areas, thoroughly “wash off” all equipment that was used at another site prior to mowing or edging any areas on the site.
E. Equipment Condition:
Machinery and equipment used by the Contractor shall be clean and well maintained at all times to ensure proper operation under this Agreement.
All mowing and trimming equipment shall be in proper adjusted and blades shall be maintained in a sharp manner. The reel blade adjustment shall provide a uniform level cut without ridges or depressions.
Mowers shall be maintained to provide a smooth even cut without tearing of the leaf blade. Always keep mowers and edgers sharp, so as to cut the tips not tear them off. Torn grass blades which have a brown “haze appearance” are not acceptable. All equipment shall be subject to inspection and approval by the City’s Representative.
F. Clipping Disposal:
All grass clippings shall be collected and removed from turf areas at the site(s) and disposed off site in an approved manner prior to the completion of the day’s mowing operations or the end of the day, whichever
occurs first. Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, etc.,
shall be cleaned after each edging by blowers, vacuum or other approved methods. Refer to Section XVII “Walks and Hardscape Care”, of this specification.
G. Watering Turf:
Water shall be applied as frequently as needed (as weather conditions require) to maintain proper growth and replenish soil moisture below the root zone. All applications of water
EXHIBIT A
38 7
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
should be in the evening or early morning hours, so as not to interfere with public use of the contract areas. If an areas appears stressed during the day, a light application of water should be applied at the at time. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to apply the water
evenly. In the event of automatic irrigation disruption or operation of manual irrigation systems, the Contractor shall hand water lawn and ground cover areas a minimum of twice per week in the Winter and four(4) times per week in the Summer. Water runoff across pavement surfaces and into gutters shall be avoided. All turf areas requiring irrigation shall be accomplished no later than 6:00 a.m.
H. Fertilization:
Lawns shall be fertilized four (4) times annually. Fertilize one (1) time per year during the month of January using a ammonium nitrate fertilizer, 33-0-0, at the rate of five pounds (5 lbs.) per 1,000 square feet, or approved equivalent program. A “complete fertilizer” with an analysis of 16-6-8, at the r
ate of six pounds (6 lbs.) per 1,000 square
feet shall be used three (3) times per year, during the months of April, July and October, or approved equivalent program.
1. All fertilization shall be included with the landscape maintenance of each contract area. The Contractor shall supply and transport all required fertilizers as a part of his cost included in the bid to the City.
I. Aeration:
All turf areas shall be aerated by removing half inch (1/2”) diameter by three inches (3”) deep cores with an aerator machine at not more than six inch (6”) spacing. Aerate compacted or stressed areas as required to increase water penetration and reduce runoff.
Contractor shall flag all irrigation sprinkler components prior to commencement of work.
Cores shall be removed and dumped in an approved manner after completion of aeration. In addition, the tops of all mounds and localized compacted dry spots shall again be aerated between the
intervals above
as necessary. All damaged areas larger than four inches by four inches (4”x4”) shall be seeded on an as needed basis at no additional cost to the City.
1. Parks: Aerify park sites turf once (1) per year between the months of February and March.
J. Dethatch:
1. All turf areas shall be dethatched once per year between September and October.
2. Dethatching shall be accomplished by use of a “vertical cut type” dethatch machine approved by the City’s Representative.
3. Contractor shall flag all sprinkler components prior to dethatching.
4. All thatch and debris shall be immediately removed upon completion.
K.
Insect, Disease and Pest Control:
The Contractor shall regularly inspect all landscape areas for presence of disease, insect or rodent infestation.
The Contractor shall advise the City within four (4) days if disease, insect or rodent infestation is found; a State Licensed Agricultural Pest Control Advisor shall identify the disease, insect or rodent and specify control measures to be taken using legally approved materials and methods, and upon written approval of the City, the Contractor shall implement the approved control measures. The use of an chemicals for insect and disease control shall be done by a State Licensed Pest Control Operator who shall follow all guidelines governing his license.
EXHIBIT A
39 8
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
1. The Contractor shall provide complete and continuous control of all plant pests or diseases. The Contractor shall select and supply proper materials and personnel to comply with all City, County, State and Federal Regulations or Laws.
2. Contractor will assume responsibility for use of all chemical controls. Pests and diseases to include, but not be limited to all insects, mites, other invertebrates, pathogens, nematodes, and vertebrates. Chemical controls to include necessary use of herbicides and plant growth regulations. Pests may be controlled by mechanical means as well as chemical.
3. Extreme caution shall be used when spraying insecticides and fungicides. Only
spray when there is no wind. City approval must be obtained prior to spraying any insecticides or fungicides, 48 hours in advance.
4. Approved control measures shall be continued until the disease, insect or rodent is controlled to the satisfaction of the City. The Contractor shall utilize all safeguards nec
essary during disease, insect or rodent control operations to ensure safety of the public and the employees of the Contractor.
L. Rodent Control:
When rodent infestation becomes evident, the Contractor shall at once proceed to exterminate and destroy the rodents by poisoning, gassing, trapping or other appropriate means.
1. Poisoning: To poison rodents, use a grain treated with an anticoagulant substance placed in bait stations. Bait must be checked daily and made available at all
times. Six (6) or seven (7) consecutive feedings are usually necessary. All dead rodents shall be properly disposed off-site.
2. Trapping: May be done in any season by the use of an approved rodent trap. All dead rodents shall be properly disposed off-site.
3. Fumigation: There are several types of toxic gasses available some of which require a special permit from the Orange County Agriculture Commissioner.
Fumigation is most effective in the Spring or when soil moisture is high.
Fumigation is not effective during periods of hibernation or aestivation since the burrows are plugged with soil.
Rodent control (poisoning or fumigation) as noted above, shall be done per the specifications of a State Licensed Agricultural Pest Control Advisor and shall be done under the
direct supervision of a State Licensed Pest Control Operator who shall follow guidelines governing his license.
IX. GROUND COVER CARE
Ground cover beds shall be maintained in an attractive condition at all times. All ground cover shall be inspected weekly and all debris including leaves branches, paper, bottles, etc. shall be removed daily. Supply the necessary services as follows:
A.
Edging and Trimming:
“Weed Eaters” shall not be used to edge ground cover unless approved by the City’s Representative. All ground covers shall be pruned, sheared or thinned neatly away from shrubs,
trees, walks, curbs, header boards, etc. Ground covers shall not be trimmed vertically unless approved by the City and shall be thinned out, as needed, to avoid matting and to achieve an overall even appearance. Keep ground cover trimmed back from all
EXHIBIT A
40 9
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
controller units, valve boxes, quick couplers or other appurtenances. Ground cover shall be trimmed six inches (6”) back from the buildings, walls, fixtures, signs, shrubs, etc.
Remove ground cover from all above ground structures unless the City directs the allowance of ground cover growth
over wall tops, curbs, etc. to prevent graffiti or for aesthetic reasons.
Ground covers are to be neatly trimmed away from sprinkler heads to ensure proper coverage and operation. Trim ground covers away from sprinkler heads by tapering away from head.
Holes shall not be cut into ground cover areas. As ground covers grow in height, risers may need to be extended to properly clear top of ground covers.
B. Watering:
Be cautious not to over water shrub and ground cove areas. Water enough to ensure moisture penetrations throughout the root zone to a depth of proximately eight inches (8”). Program irrigation systems to maintain a precipitation of one-half inch (1/2”) per week during the growing season. During prolonged rainy periods discontinue irrigation sequences. Ponding of water will not be allowed and should be avoided at all times.
C. Fertilization:
Vigorous growth and good color must be maintained at all times.
Any non-native ground
cover beds shall be fertilized two (2) times per year, or as directed. Fertilize during the months of April and October using a “complete fertilizer” with an analysis of 16-6-8 at the rate of six pounds (6 lbs.) per 1,000 square feet, or approved equivalent program.
When soils tests indicate deficiency, the soil laboratory’s recommendations shall be followed. Also refer to the Yearly Landscape Maintenance Schedule.
D. Pest and Rodent Control:
1. Snails and Slugs: Treat for snails and slugs as needed. Treatment shall be as approved by the City and may vary from one project areas to another. In general, broadcast and approved granule, pellet or meal at the recommended rate of three (3) times a year minimum; Spring, late Summer and Winter and/or spray an approved
insecticide as needed for complete snail and slug control based upon a program designed by a State Licensed Pest Control Operator.
2. Rodent and Pest Control: Refer to Section VIII, “Rodent Control”, of this specification for approved methods of spray control.
3. Insecticide and Fungus Control: Refer to Section VIII, “Insect, Disease and Pest Control”, of this specification for approved methods of spray control.
E.
Plant Material Replacement:
Following acceptance of contract areas, it shall be the Contractor’s responsibility to
maintain all plant material in a satisfactory manner and to replace, at Contractor’s expense, dead or severely damaged plant material with equal size and quality materials at City’s direction. The Contractor, after notification of City’s authorization, shall remove and replace, at no cost to the City, any tree, shrub, turf or ground cover which is damaged or lost due to Contractor or his employees’
negligence through improper use of
horticultural practices, pesticides, watering, failure to control rodents and insects or improper use of equipment.
Any ground cover, tree and/or shrub that appears to have more than one/half (1/2) of its foliage in a declining state shall be brought to the City’s attention immediately. Check plant for root over-watering or drainage problems and repair the problem prior to
EXHIBIT A
41 10
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
replacement. Replacement plants shall be of a size condition and variety acceptable to the City. The Contractor shall pay for all replacement plants, including materials,
transportation and labor unless the City determines that the plant was lost due to an “Acts of God”, damaged by others, or as a result of an event without control or negligence by the Contractor.
X. TREE CARE
All trees shall be checked monthly for any damage, special water needs, etc. and treated as necessary. Undesirable conditions shall be eliminated per accepted landscape maintenance
practices. The Contractor shall maintain all trees, whether specifically mentioned or not, in a healthy condition at all times.
The Contractor is responsible for maintenance pruning of trees to a height of fourteen feet (14’) above the ground. All trees will be trimmed at least once a year and palms will be trimmed as needed throughout the year.
A. Pruning:
Pruning shall be performed as an on-going operation by the Contractor, and shall be done under the direction of the City’s Representative. Prune trees to select and develop permanent branches that have a smaller diameter than the trunk or branch to which they are attached. Remove all dead, diseased or damaged growth; eliminate narrow V-shaped branch forks. Reduce topping and wind damage by removing crossover branching and by thinning out crowns. Prune to control growth within the trees’ space limitation, to maintain a natural form and to allow head clearance. Prune two sample trees of each genus and species under the direction of the City’s Representative for approval and control purposes, prior to
proceeding with balance of tree pruning work.
1. Young Tree Pruning: Lower branches shall remain in a “tipped back” or pinched condition, leaving as much foliage as possible to promote caliper trunk growth.
Stripping of lower branches will not be allowed. Lower branches shall be cut flush with the trunk only when the tree is able to stand without support.
2. Evergreen Tree Pruning: Evergreen trees (trees that are not deciduous) can be pruned or thinned at any time when necessary. Prune for appearance and safety and remove dead or broken branches. Prune especially during the months of September and October
to prepare the trees for the windy season. For safety reasons remove any part that may become a hazard by falling.
a. Pines: Pines shall not be pruned except as corrective or preventative maintenance. Removal of lower branches for turf maintenance is allowable, but in no case shall branches be removed to expose more than 2’ of the trunk.
3. Deciduous Tree Pruning: The pruning of deciduous trees shall be done during the dormant season, December, January and February except for blooming trees which will be pruned after blooming. However, if a tree becomes damaged or constitutes a
health or safety hazard, it shall be pruned at any time as required. All pruning cuts shall be made flush with the trunk, lateral branches or buds. “Stubbing” of branches will not be allowed.
B. Staking and Guying:
Tree stakes, ties and guys shall be checked at least monthly and adjusted as needed. Tree ties shall be inspected to prevent bark wounds caused by abrasion and ties shall be adjusted to prevent girdling. Before any stakes are removed, remove tree ties and allow the tree to remain without support for a period of time to observe structural stability of
EXHIBIT A
42 11
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
the tree. The tree must retain its upright position and this position must be held regardless of moisture content of the soil. Remove tree stakes only when tree has proven to be structurally stable. Any restaking shall be done with originally specified materials. Stakes shall not be placed closer than eight inches (8”) from trunk of tree.
Guying will, over time, stretch or loosen. Adjust as needed to retain a taut position, until such time when guying is removed. Any tree that is damaged due to improper staking or tying shall be replaced at
the Contractor’s expense. Replace broken stakes and damaged guys as required. Damaged trees shall be staked within twenty-four (24) hours of identification of damage by Contractor, City or the public’s notification to Contractor.
Replacement stakes or new staking shall be completed within five (5) days. (Labor only, materials will be paid for by the City as “Extra Work” materials.)
C. Tree Guards:
Newly planted trees in turf areas shall be inspected at the base of the trunk for tree guards weekly. Contractor shall report any missing tree guards to the City immediately.
Tree guards shall only be removed as directed by the City’s Representative.
D. Watering Basins:
Watering basins shall be properly maintained on all trees, shrubs, and vines to ensure adequate water penetration. Failure of the irrigation systems to provide enough deep moisture will not alleviate the Contractor from providing adequate moisture to any
material. Rake out water basins only as directed by the City’s Representative.
E. Fertilization:
All trees shall be deep-fed or vertical mulched as needed or determined by the City’s Representative by means of one inch (1”) diameter holes drilled two feet (2’) deep at six foot (6’) intervals around the drip line and filled with 12-12-6 commercial fertilizer, or approved equivalent program.
F. Pest Control:
All trees should be inspected regularly for disease, fungus or insect infestation and sprayed accordingly as needed. Upon notification by City, Contractor shall provide labor, equipment and materials to spray pesticides in the manner specified by a State Licensed
Pest Control Advisor and the City.
G. Clearance and Visibility:
Prune trees to allow necessary clearance for the safety of pedestrian traffic, vehicle circulation and signage, etc. Prune trees along sidewalks to allow ten feet (10’)
clearance for pedestrians and fourteen feet (14’) above curb and gutters for vehicular traffic, and two feet (2’) from all walls and structures or as directed by the City’s Representative.
H. Plant Replacement:
Refer to Section IX, “Plant Material Replacement”, of this Specification.
XI. SHRUB AND VINE CARE
All shrubbery shall be checked weekly for any breakage or damage, special watering needs, etc., and treated as necessary. All undesirable conditions shall be eliminated per accepted landscape maintenance practices. All shrubs shall be maintained in a healthy vigorous condition. Remove all spent flowers, flower spikes, all leaves and debris, soot and accumulated dirt from plant areas.
EXHIBIT A
43 12
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
A. Pruning:
Pruning shall be performed as an on-going operation, and shall be done under the direction of the City’s Representative, not allowing plants to develop stray, undesirable growth.
Trimming, pruning, thinning and training are functions to be done as needed to maintain a pleasing appearance. Any shrub under stress should be trimmed to reduce evaporation. All pruning shall be done to a naturalistic shape, n
ot hedged into geometric forms. The design
intent is to have naturalistic shrub masses not individual shrub forms or standards.
Accomplish pruning by selectively removing woody stems from inside shrubs on an as needed basis as directed by the City’s Representative. Excessive pruning or stubbing back will not be permitted. Top shrubs only when necessary for appearance and after interior selective branch pruning has been completed or as directed by the City’s Representative.
Shrubs shall be pruned and thinned using hand-held shrub pruners. Hedge shears and clippers shall only be used if approved, in writing, by City’s Representative.
B. Watering:
Refer to Section IX, “Watering”, of this specification for watering in ground cover and shrub areas. Maintain a watering basin around all shrubs and vines on slope areas to insure adequate water penetration. Rake out basins only as directed by the City’s
Representative.
C. Fertilization:
Shrubs located in ground cover areas will not require additional fertilizing. See Section IX, “Fertilization”, for fertilization application in ground cover areas.
D. Pest Control:
Check all plant material in landscaped areas weekly and apply pesticides at the first sign of infestation.
E. Clearance and Visibility:
Where shrubs occur in close proximity to sidewalks, curbs, roadways and parked cars, prune to allow movement without interference from branches and foliage. Prune shrubbery to allow necessary clearance for the safety of pedestrian
traffic, vehicle circulation, signage,
etc., and a minimum of two feet (2’) from walls and structures or as directed by the City’s Representative.
F. Plant Replacement:
Refer to Section IX, “Plant Material Replacement”, of this specification.
XII. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS CARE
The Contractor will receive all irrigation systems in a sound working order at the beginning of contract. If any system is found to be otherwise at the start of work, the City shall be notified immediately and necessary repairs will be at no cost to the Contractor. At the close of the
contract period, all irrigation systems will be checked by the City’s Representative, and all irrigation systems shall be returned to the City in a satisfactory condition. Any faulty portion shall be repaired or replaced by the Contractor at not cost to the City.
A. Irrigation Repair and Operation:
1. Irrigation system components damaged as a result of Contractor’s neglect shall be repaired or replaced by the Contractor at no cost to the City. Normal wear and tear of systems, vandalism, accidental breakage by others, or so-called “Acts of
EXHIBIT A
44 13
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
God”, are conditions under which the Contractor is not directly responsible and repairs shall be paid for by the City. The Contractor shall notify the City’s
Representative the same day of discovery of damage to irrigation system components caused by vandalism, “Acts of God”, vehicular damage, theft or mysterious damages that do not result from the performance of the work by the Contractor. Upon receipt of the City’s written authorization, repair of said damage as soon as possible after discovery, billing the City for the cost of such repair on the subsequent monthly billing statement. Failure to report any damages will constitute Contractor making repairs at his own expense. Any replacement of irrigation system component under this sub-paragraph A shall be original equipment types where known. Any substitutions for replacement equipment shall be approved, in writing, from the City’s Representative prior to doing work.
2. Irrigation shall be done by the use of automatic sprinkler systems, where available and operable; however, failure of the existing irrigation system to provide full and proper coverage
shall not relieve the Contractor of the responsibility to provide adequate irrigation with full and proper coverage to all areas in the work site.
3. Any damages to public or private property resulting from excessive irrigation water or runoff shall be charged against the contract payment unless immediate repairs are made by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the City.
4. The Contractor shall keep controller and valve boxes clear of solids and debris and maintain the irrigation system including the replacement, repair, adjustment, raise or lower, straighten, and any other operation required for the continued proper
operation
of the system from the water meter throughout the work site. Repair of replacement includes, but is not limited to: sprinkler system laterals (piping), sprinkler mains (pressure lines), sprinkler control valves, sprinkler controllers, sprinkler heads, sprinkler caps, sprinkler head risers, valve covers, boxes and lids, including electrical pull boxes and lids, valve sleeves, quick coupler valves and hose bibs, etc.
5. All irrigation repairs shall
be made within 24 hours or prior to the next
irrigation cycle. All repairs shall be made in accordance with City of Orange Standard Irrigation Specifications.
6. Contractor shall maintain an adequate stock of medium and high usage items for
repair of all irrigation systems.
B. Monitoring Systems:
1. The Contractor shall inspect the irrigation systems for broken and clogged heads, malfunctioning or leaking valves, or any other condition which hampers the correct operation of the system. Authorization must be obtained from the City before
proceeding with work not covered under normal maintenance work and the malfunctioning sprinkler system area shall be irrigated by a portable irrigation method until all authorized repairs have been completed to the City’s satisfaction.
Each irrigation controller(s) and system shall be checked weekly for proper water scheduling and coverage. The Contractor shall clean and adjust sprinkler heads as needed for proper coverage. Each system shall be manually operated at the irrigation controller and observed on a monthly basis. Make all necessary adjustments to heads which throw onto roadways, walks, windows, park facilities or out of intended area of coverage.
2. The Contractor shall turn off irrigation systems during periods of rainfall and times when suspension of irrigation is desirable to conserve while remaining within guidelines to good horticulturally acceptable maintenance practices.
EXHIBIT A
45 14
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
3. One man shall have responsibility of operating and knowing the irrigation system and his duties shall be to adjust controllers, observe the effectiveness of the irrigation systems and make minor adjustments and repairs to systems.
C.
Coverage/Application Rate:
Generally, watering shall be done at night, between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., unless otherwise directed by the City. The Contractor shall operate systems and irrigation heads as seasonal conditions require. During extremely hot weather, over-extended holiday periods and during or following breakdown of systems, the Contractor shall provide adequate personnel
and materials as required to adequately water all landscaped areas. When breakdowns or malfunctions exist, the Contractor shall water manually by whatever means necessary to maintain all plant material in a healthy condition. Dry conditions shall not be permitted to develop.
D. Tests:
The Contractor shall test the soil in turf and ground cover areas and around trees and shrubs monthly or as necessary with soil probes to determine that the proper amount of
water is being applied at all times. This information shall be used to adjust watering times on the controller and supplemental hand or deep watering as necessary. The Contractor shall make the soil probe available at all monthly walk-through inspections.
E. Systems Maintenance:
Once a year during the month of March, the Contractor shall clean valve boxes, remove intruding soil and replace gravel as originally specified. Once a month, the Contractor shall wipe down the equipment in the controller cabinet to remove all dirt and dust. All covered electrical connections shall be sprayed with compressed air (i.e., inside
controller). All exposed electrical connections shall be sprayed with silicone (i.e., terminal strips).
F. Maintenance Work Not Included:
Testing, certification and service of the backflow prevention device(s) shall be done by others. However, it shall be the Maintenance Contractor’s responsibility to notify the City should a malfunction occur.
XIII.
SURFACE DRAINAGE FACILITIES
A. All surface drainage devices such as concrete ‘V’ ditches, bench drains, swales, inlets, and other surface drains
shall be inspected monthly or more often as necessary and kept free of all algae, debris, vegetation, soil, etc., which would preclude their proper, intended function.
B. All landscape drainage devices shall be routinely inspected and flushed of all foreign
matter in order to maintain their proper, intended functioning.
XIV. SECURITY LIGHTING FACILITIES
A. The lamp surfaces of all security lights shall be routinely wiped clean of silt, dust and residue which diminishes their intended illumination. All replacement of lamps or equipment, repairs or adjustments shall be in accordance with City approved plans and
specifications.
B. Once a month during the first week of the month, a night inspection shall be performed on all non-functioning light identified for repair and/or bulb replacement.
EXHIBIT A
46 15
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
XV. GROUNDS MAINTENANCE CARE
A. General Maintenance:
The Contractor shall provide grounds maintenance.
1. All areas shall be inspected daily and maintained in a neat, clean, and safe condition at all times.
2. All broken glass and sharp objects shall be removed daily.
3. All animal feces or other materials detrimental to human health shall be removed from the park areas daily.
4. Decomposed granite areas shall be kept level at grade at all times, free of weeds, trash and debris.
B. Barbecue Grills:
All barbecue grills shall be emptied of all ashes twice weekly, every Monday and Friday.
C. Drinking Fountains:
All drinking fountains shall be kept clean and operational at all times.
D.
Park Amenities:
Benches, picnic tables and play equipment shall be cleaned weekly or more often as needed.
E. Trash/Litter Collection and Disposal:
The Contractor shall inspect all parks prior to 11:00 a.m. at least two (2) times per week, removing all litter from turf, planters, sandlots, walkways, parking lots, receptacles and dumpster enclosures.
1. Trash, litter, and other debris from the park site as well as trash and litter
blown by the wind or deposited by persons passing by or visiting the Contract Areas shall be collected. All paper, trash, cans, bottles, etc., shall not be dumped on- site in trash dumpsters at contract areas, but should be disposed of in a legal manner at the Contractor’s expense off site.
2. The Contractor shall respond within an hour during regular working hours to the City’s direction regarding litter pick-up. If
refuse or litter is not removed
during daily site visit, said litter or debris will be considered an emergency and removed immediately upon notification by the City. Failure of said removal may result in deduction of payment for that date or week.
3. Leaves, grass clippings, branches, weeds and any other landscape debris accumulated from the landscape areas shall be disposed of off-site the same day the debris is accumulated.
F. Trash Containers:
Trash containers provided by the City shall be inspected two (2) times per week and emptied as often as required
and washed after emptying (when necessary) to be determined by the City’s Representative. Contractor shall provide approved plastic liners (40” x 48” x .74
EXHIBIT A
47 16
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
minimum or approved equivalent) for all trash containers at Contractor’s own expense.
Trash liners shall be changed two (2) times per week or more often as required.
G. Tree Wells:
Trash, leaves and debris shall be removed from tree wells weekly.
H. Greenwaste/Land Diversion Program:
The Contractor shall comply with any adopted City programs for waste reduction/recycling effective during the period of the Contract.
XVI. WALKS AND HARDSCAPE CARE
A. General:
During each site visit all concrete and asphalt playing surfaces, driveways, parking lots, sidewalks, and picnic slab areas shall be checked and cleaned. Work shall be scheduled so as to not interfere with normal playing activity.
1. All contract areas shall be inspected daily and maintained in a neat, clean, and safe condition at all times. Leaves, branches and other debris shall be collected and removed from contract areas.
2. All contract areas shall be swept weekly or more often as required to remove all deposits of silt and/or sand and glass.
3. Expansion joints and cracks shall be kept free of weeds at all times.
B.
Sweeping, Vacuuming and Blowing Off Walks and Stairways:
All walks and stairways shall be kept clean at all times; they shall be swept or vacuumed weekly or more often if necessary.
1. All walk and stairways shall be kept free of debris, leaves and other debris from the landscape Areas as well as trash and litter blown by the wind or deposited by persons
passing by or visiting the site. Debris shall be collected two (2) times per week. All paper, trash, etc. should be dumped off site in a legal manner at the Contractor’s expense.
2. All walks and stairways shall be kept free of dirt, leaves and other debris from the maintenance operations as well as trash and litter blown by the wind or deposited by persons passing by or visiting the site. Debris shall be collected two (2)
times per week. All paper, trash, etc., shall be dumped off site in a legal manner by the Contractor.
3. Work shall be coordinated with mowing or other maintenance work on the area. All gutters within the maintenance area shall be kept clean of grass clippings and
miscellaneous trash. All grass clippings shall be removed (not scattered) from gutters the same day mowing and edging take place.
C. Dog Droppings:
Shall be removed when found during maintenance operations. Walks shall be hosed off after droppings are removed.
D. Hosing Off Walks and Stairways:
EXHIBIT A
48 17
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
In general, all walkways and stairways shall be hosed off as required by the City in place of sweeping concrete as described above. Care shall be taken so that this does not inhibit or endanger pedestrians
utilizing walks and stairways. This work should be scheduled to coincide with mowing or other maintenance work in the area.
E. Street Clean-Up:
Street sweeping is maintained under a separate contract and is not a part of this maintenance work. The Contractor shall, however, remove and disposed of off site, at an approved dump site, all grass clippings and miscellaneous debris or trash blown into the parking lot and streets by the wind or deposited by persons passing by or visiting the site. Grass clippings shall be cleaned from gutters the same day mowing takes place.
XVII. SAND COURT CARE
A. General:
These areas shall include tot lots, play areas, volleyball courts, horseshoe pits, etc.
1. All tot lot areas shall be raked to remove leaves and debris two (2) times per week.
2. Sand in play areas
must be kept clean and maintained for safe playing. Each sandlot shall have trash and glass removed and depressions filled in weekly and rototilled quarterly.
All sand areas shall be rototilled to the maximum depth that will allow complete loosening of the sand but will not cause lower base materials to be mixed in with the sand. After rototilling, all areas shall be raked level.
3. Sand around the edge
of sand lots shall be swept, using a hand broom, and the sand shall be put back in the sand lot. Use of blowers will not be allowed.
4. On Monday and Friday of each week all sand areas shall be raked level and kept free of any foreign debris.
5. All sand areas shall be maintained weed free.
6. Sand shall be replenished as necessary to
maintain optimum level in each area,
generally six inches (6”) below the top of the concrete curbing but dependent upon play equipment footing and final level shall be determined by the City’s Representative. Replacement sand shall be washed plaster sand or approved equivalent at no extra cost to the City.
7. In the event of inclement weather if at anytime the sand court areas become flooded and there is standing water, it will be the Contractor’s responsibility to remove water immediately.
XVIII. DRESS CODE AND APPEARANCE
The Contractor shall be required to provide company uniforms, with company name, approved by the City for personnel assigned to the contract areas. Sufficient changes s hall be provided to present
a neat and clean appearance of landscape personnel at all times.
The proper uniform includes:
A. Safety Equipment:
EXHIBIT A
49 18
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
All employees, when operating power equipment, shall have the proper safety devices in place such as face shields, ear protectors, eye goggles, dust masks, etc.
B. Shoes:
Safety leather boots, or shoes, in good condition. No sandals or tennis shoes shall be worn on the job. In the event that tennis shoes or
sandals are worn, the City’s
Representative may suspend work for that day.
C. Company Shirts:
Shall be worn by Contractor’s personnel at all times.
XIX. EXTRA WORK
The City may, from time to tome, need additional landscape maintenance services which shall only be authorized by the City’s Representative as stipulated in the contract and upon execution of the
contract documents. Extra work shall be performed by the Contractor or by competitive bid option at the discretion of the City.
A. In the event the Contractor is required by the City and agrees to perform extra work, the following procedure shall govern such work:
1. When required by the City, an estimate of cost will be submitted to the Department of Community Services for approval prior to work being done. The Contractor shall maintain records sufficient to distinguish the direct cost of other operations. He shall furnish reports of extra work on forms furnished by the Contractor, itemizing all costs for labor, materials and equipment
rental. The report shall include
hours worked. The following procedure will govern such extra work.
2. Work will be executed under the direction of the City’s Representative on a time and materials basis or an agreed lump sum price depending on the nature of the
work.
3. City will issue a work request for such extra work to be performed.
4. Extra work will not be initiated without written authorization, except in emergency call-out situations. Contractor agrees that any services performed which are not authorized by the delegated City’s Representative, as stipulated in the contract, may result in non-payment by the City.
B. Extra work may include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Replacement of plant materials due to failures beyond the Contractor’s control.
2. Replacement of worn out damaged sprinkler heads, valves, quick couplers, etc.
3. Additional treatment required for planting or soil as not set forth specifically in this Specification.
4. Remedial landscaping.
5. Repairs or replacements due to vandalism or “Acts of God”.
C.
Labor costs shall be based on the proposed wage scale for each type of workman.
D. The City’s Representative is limited to issuance of orders, directions, notices and instructions, pursuant to the scope of landscape maintenance. The City shall not be
EXHIBIT A
50 19
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
obligated to pay for extra services which are not supported, in writing, by a Field Change Order Form.
E. Contractor shall submit invoices for Extra Work separate from regular monthly maintenance billing and shall detail: 1) site location, 2) services performed, 3) amount, 4) City’s Representative which ordered or authorized services.
XX.
WEEKLY MAINTENANCE REVIEW
A. The City shall inspect the work every week to ensure adequacy of maintenance and methods of performing the work
are in compliance with the contract. However, such inspection or failure of City to inspect shall not relieve the Contractor of the duty to provide continuous inspection of the work area.
B. The Contractor shall meet bi-weekly with the City’s Representative to review the
Contractor’s schedules and performance, resolve problems and perform field inspections as required. Should such inspections find deficient performance or service failure, the liquidated damage clauses of this contract will be enacted.
C. Bi-weekly maintenance site review meetings followed by a satisfactory completion of any or all punch list items generated thereof is a required prerequisite for payment of monthly invoices.
XXI. REPORTS, SCHEDULES AND FORMS
The Contractor, as part of this agreement, will submit reports and schedules as requested. Failure to submit reports and schedules in a timely manner may result in a delay of monthly payments. Such reports must be detailed, thorough and may include, but not be limited to, the following:
A. Weekly Maintenance Schedule(s):
1. Contractor shall provide a weekly maintenance schedule(s) to the City. The schedule(s) shall indicate the frequency of time and days of the week services are to be performed.
2. Notifi
cation of change in scheduled work must be received by the City at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled time for the work.
3. Contractor shall adjust his work schedule to compensate for all special events,
holidays and inclement weather.
B. Pesticide Use Reports
C.
Hazards Reports
D. Cost information to perform extra work for upgrading specific areas.
E. Suggestions for improving problem areas.
F. All forms and schedule(s) shall be of a format supplied by or approved by the City.
XXII. Unit Price Information
All bidders are required to provide the following unit cost figures. The figures shall be used by the City for adding to or deleting payment deductions due to performance failure from the
contracting work. All unit prices shall include labor and material complete installation where required.
EXHIBIT A
51 20
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
A. Labor and Equipment Hourly Rates and Unit Costs
1. Landscape Maintenance Labor $__________per hour
2. Landscape Maintenance Leadworker
$__________per hour
3. Landscape Maintenance Supervisor $__________per hour
4. Irrigation Technician
$__________per hour
5. Pest Control Applicator $__________per hour
6. Tree
Trimmer $__________per hour
7. Equipment Operator $__________per hour
B.
Turf Care Unit Cost
1. Mowing $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
2. Edge
& Trim $__________/1000 l.f.
3. Weed Eat Turf $__________/1000 l.f.
4. Chemical Edge 6” $__________/1000 l.f.
5. Fertilization $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
6. Aerification $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
7. Renovation
Dethatch
$__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
Dethatch/ Overseed $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
8. Weed Control $__________/1000
s.f.
$__________/Acre
$__________/Hour
C. Ground Cover Care Unit Cost
1. Edge & Trim $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
2. Mow/Cut back $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
3. Fertilization $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
4. Weed
Control $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
$__________/Hour
5. Pest Control $__________/1000 s.f.
EXHIBIT A
52 21
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
$__________/Acre
$__________/Hour
D. Shrub and Vine Care
Pruning Unit Cost
1. 1-5 feet $__________/Each
6 plus feet
$__________/Each
2. Fertilization
a. Dry formulation placement $__________/Each
b. Foliar
application $__________/Each
c. Soil
injection $__________/Each
3. Pest Control
$__________/Each
$__________/Hour
E. Tree Care
Pruning
Unit Cost
1. 1-14 feet $__________/Each
2. Fertilization
a.
Dry formulation placement $__________/Each
b. Foliar application
$__________/Each
c. Soil
injection $__________/Each
d. Vertical mulching
$__________/Each
3. Pest
Control $__________/Each
$__________/Hour
4. Tree
Staking $__________/Each
Tree Guying
$__________/Each
F. Plant Material and Installation: (Including all Labor and Equipment for Removal, Replacement and Disposal)
Unit Cost
1. Annual Color (4” Container) $__________/Each
2. Ground
Cover $__________/Flat
3. One (1) Gallon
Shrub
$__________/Each
Tree $__________/Each
4. Five (5) Gallon
Shrub $__________/Each
Tree $__________/Each
5. Fifteen (15) Gallon
Shrub $__________/Each
Tree $__________/Each
6. 24” Box Tree $__________/Each
EXHIBIT A
53 22
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
7. 36” Box Tree $__________/Each
8. Seeded Turf/Top Dress $__________/s.f.
$__________/1000 s.f.
9. Sodded Turf $__________/s.f.
$__________/1000 s.f.
10. Stolonized
Turf $__________/s.f.
$__________/1000 s.f.
11. Bark
Mulch $__________/s.f.
$__________/1000 s.f.
G. Weed Abatement (Labor, equipment, materials)
Unit Cost
1. Tractor Drawn Disc $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
2. Hand Work $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
3. Flail Mowing $__________/1000 s.f.
$__________/Acre
4. Pre-emergent Herbicide (Broad spectrum) $__________/1000 s.f. $__________/Acre
5. Post-emergent Herbicide (Systemic) $__________/1000 s.f. $__________/Acre
H. Irrigation Repairs (Including all labor and equipment for removal and disposal)
Unit Cost
1. Remote control valve R & R Rainbird
EFB-CP-Series
3/4” $__________/Each
1” $__________/Each
1 1/4" $__________/Each
1 1/2" $__________/Each
2” $__________/Each
2 1/2” $__________/Each
3” $__________/Each
2. Repair lateral PVC lines each Unit Cost
1/2" $__________/LF
3/4” $__________/LF
EXHIBIT A
54 23
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
1” $__________/LF
1 1/4" $__________/LF
1 1/2" $__________/LF
2” $__________/LF
2 1/2” $__________/LF
3” $__________/LF
4” $__________/LF
3. Repair pressure main PVC lines each Unit Cost
1/2" (Schedule 40) $__________/LF
3/4” (Schedule 40) $__________/LF
1” (Schedule 40) $__________/LF
1 1/4" (Schedule 40) $__________/LF
1 1/2" (Schedule 40) $__________/LF
2” (Class 315) $__________/LF
2 1/2” (Class 315) $__________/LF
1 1/2" (Class 315), ring tite $__________/LF
3” (Class 315) $__________/LF
3” (Class 315), ring tite $__________/LF
4” (Class 315) $__________/LF
4” (Class 315), ring tite $__________/LF
4. Raise valve boxes, fill soil
to grade top and seed $__________/Each
5. Replace valve box, standard
Square 11” x 17” $__________/Each
6. Replace valve box, round, 9” $__________/Each
7. Replace sprinklers and required
PVC
parts $__________/Each
Hunter I-25 $__________/Each
Hunter I-44 $__________/Each
Rainbird 1806 SAM PRS $__________/Each
EXHIBIT A
55 24
02449 – Landscape Maintenance
Rainbird 1812 SAM PRS $__________/Each
Rainbird 41A Rotor $__________/Each
Rainbird 47A Rotor $__________/Each
Toro 570C-6P $__________/Each
Toro 570C-12P $__________/Each
Toro 640 Series $__________/Each
I. Grounds Maintenance (All extra work and payment deductions due to performance failure shall include labor and material.)
Description Unit Cost
1. Trash Pick Up $__________/Hour
2. Trash Can Liner Replacement $__________/Can
3. Tot/Sandlots
Clean/Rake Sand
$__________/1000 s.f.
Rototill $__________/1000 s.f.
Add Sand $__________/Cubic Yard
4. Horseshoe Pits
Clean/Rake $__________/Pit
5. Picnic Areas
Sweep/Blow $__________/Picnic Area
Wash $__________/Picnic Area
6. Picnic Tables/Benches/Bleachers
Wash/Clean $__________/Each
7. B.B.Q’s
Empty/Clean $__________/Each
End of Section
EXHIBIT A
56 June 28, 2024 Agenda Item: 13b
Members of the Marina City Council Meeting
City Council of July 2, 2024
CITY COUNCIL TO RECEIVE PRESENTATION FROM FM3 ON THE
PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY FOR THE PROPOSED GO BOND BALLOT
MEASURE.
RECOMMENDATION
1. City Council receive presentation from FM3 on public opinion survey for the proposed GO Bond ballot measure; and provide direction to staff.
BACKGROUND
FM3 is completing the public op inion survey for the proposed GO Bond ballot measure to construct city facilities. They will be making a powerpoint presentation at the July 2, 2024, City Council meeting. This presentation will b e made available to the council and public on July 2, 2024.
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________________
Layne Long
City Manage
City of Marina
June 25, 2024 Item No. 13c
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 2, 2024
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO, 2024 -,
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY
DEMAND THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL
IMPROVEMENTS AND MAKING FINDINGS RELATING THERETO
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider:
1. Adopting Resolution No. 2024-, determining that the public interest and necessity demand the construction of certain municipal improvements and making findings relating thereto BACKGROUND:
When Marina first became a city in 1975, a few temporary, portable buildings were set up to operate as the City Hall offices. The plan was to replace them in about six months. But, nearly 50 years later those temporary portable buildings are still being used to house City services, despite the fact that they are deteriorating, are not accessible for residents with disabilities, are undersized, unsafe, and structurally unsound. The current facilities pose safety risks and are inadequate to meet the needs of Marina’s residents.
The population of the City has grown substantially since the public safety building was built for combined police and fire services in 1993. Today, the City has full -service Fire and Police Departments. The current building is too small to accommodate the modern technology and life - saving equipment, such as rescue equipment and a ladder truck, to keep the City safe.
Moreover, more than 80 percent of all 9 -1-1 calls to the Marina Fire Department are medical emergencies, such as heart attacks, strokes, and car accidents. Seconds matter in a life - threatening situation, but because aging fire stations are located far from many Marina residents, response times for some areas of the City are close to 10 minutes, much slower than the 5-minute national standard. The City’s aging fire, police station and emergency response center are not up to earthquake safety standards. If these stations collapse in an earthquake, first responders may not be able to get to residents in need.
Additionally, t he City lacks the indoor recreation centers that are common in nearby communities, and has an existing unusable recreation and aquatic center transferred to the City from the Army in 1999, that if renovated would provide year -round recreation, swimming, and other safe activities for children, teens, families, and seniors.
The City only has one, undersized, deteriorating community space, which is not up to earthquake and fire safety standards, has a leaky roof, yet this space is packed every day by the City’s daycare, pre -school, before and after school programs, and other youth programs; senior programs, community exercise classes, and community events. 1 Assessment of the buildings conducted by outside consultants show repairing these buildings could cost nearly as much as replacing them, and even then, the restored facilities would be undersized and inadequate for Marina’s population.
ANALYSIS:
It has been determined that the publi c interest and necessity demand c onstruction and completion by the City of police, fi re, a nd community facilities and has determined to place a bond measure on the November 5, 2024, ballot, a sking City vote rs for the authority to issue bonds to fina nce such municipal improvement projects. The estimate d cost of the muni cipal improvements is up to $80,000,000.
Pursuant to Section 43607 of the California Government Code, proceedings for such bond measure are initiated when Council passes a r esolution, by a two-thirds vote of all its membe rs determining, that the public interest or necessity de mands the acquisition, construction, or completion of any municipal improvement.
Pursuant to Section 43608, a t any subsequent meeting, by a two-thirds vote of all its members, the C
ouncil must pa ss an ordina nce ordering the subm ission of the proposition of incurring a bonded debt for the purpose set forth in said resolution to the qualified voters of the city at an elec
tion held for that purpose. Assuming a pproval by the Council of the resolution of necessity, such ordinance will be brought before the Council for adoption on August 7, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If the authorization is received from the voters at the Nove mber 5, 2024, election, all costs of the proje
cts will be funded fr om the proc eeds of bonds sold by the City a nd all de bt se rvice requirements of the bonds will be pa id by City property owners by an ad va lorem tax a dded to the tax roll.
CONC
LUSION:
This reque
st is submitted for City Council consideration and action.
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina
Reviewed
_____________________________
René Alejandro Ortega
City Attorne
y
Cit
y of Marina
2 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA, DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY DEMAND THE CONSTRUCTION OF
CERTAIN MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENTS AND MAKING FINDINGS RELATING
THERETO
RESOLVED, by the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of Marina (the “City”) as follows:
WHEREAS, when Marina first became a city in 1975, a few temporary, portable buildings were set up to operate as the City Hall offices. The plan was to replace them in about six months. But, nearly 50 years later those temporary portable buildings are still being used to house City services, despite the fact that they are deteriorating, are not accessible for residents with disabilities, are undersized, unsafe, and structurally unsound. The current facilities pose safety risks and are inadequate to meet the needs of Marina’s residents;
WHEREAS, the population of the City has grown substantially since the public safety building was built for combined police and fire service s in 1993 . T he current building is too small to accommodate the modern technology and life-saving equipment, such as rescue equipment and a ladder truck, to keep the City safe;
WHEREAS, more than 80 percent of all 9 -1-1 calls to the Marina Fire Department are medical emergencies, such as heart attacks, strokes, and car accidents. Seconds matter in a life - threatening situation, but because aging fire stations are located far from many Marina residents, response times for some areas of the City are close to 10 minutes, much slower than the 5-minute national standard;
WHEREAS, the City’s aging fire, police station and emergency response center are not up to earthquake safety standards. If these stations collapse in an earthquake, first responders may not be able to get to residents in need.
WHEREAS, the City lacks the indoor recreation centers that are common in nearby communities, and has an existing unusable recreation and aquatic center transferred to the city from the Army in 1999, that if renovated would provide year -round recreation, swimming, and other safe activities for children, teens, families, and seniors;
WHEREAS, the City only has one, undersized, deteriorating community space, which is not up to earthquake and fire safety standards, has a leaky roof, yet this space is packed every day by the City’s daycare, pre -school, before and after school programs, and other youth programs; senior programs, community exercise classes, and community events.
WHEREAS, assessment of the buildings conducted by outside consultants show repairing these buildings would cost nearly as much as replacing them, and even then, the restored facilities would be undersized and inadequate for Marina’s population.
WHEREAS, Council has determined that the public interest and necessity demand construction and completion by the City of police, fire and community facilities and has determined that asking City voters for the authority to issue bonds to finance such projects;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina, California that:
3 Resolution No. 2024-
Page Two
Section1. Findings and Determinations.
(a) Based upon professional staff and consultant study and evaluation, the Council finds that the public interest and necessity demand the construction and completion by the City of Marina police, fire and community facilities.
(b) The estimated cost of the municipal improvements set forth in Section 1(a) is up to $80,000,000, which will be provided through a general obligation bond. The construction and completion of the municipal improvements requires an expenditure greater than available in the City’s current budget and will require the issuance of a bond therefore, and such issuance is necessary and convenient to carry out the objects, purposes and powers of the City.
(c) Passing a bond measure will allow the City to have the facilities and staff needed for a community its size. This measure would provide a place for the City’s growing number of seniors to take fitness classes, stay active and healthy, and for youth and adults to exercise and play indoor sports without traveling to other cities and would provide a swim facility for City residents, including the Marina High School swim team . It is a good investment in our community’s long-term health and quality of life. The measure would allow the City to provide a safe community space adequate for our residents’ needs. The measure would allow for additional facility space for staffing and the life -saving equipment we currently lack to meet more of our population’s needs and respond to multiple emergencies at the same time . The measure would locate an additional fire station where it is most needed and allow firefighters on duty each day to respond faster to emergencies throughout the city when seconds count. The measure will ensure that emergency services remain operational and reliable in a major earthquake.
Section 2. Fiscal Accountability. The expenditure of bond proceeds to construct the proposed improvements will be subject to strict financial accountability requirements, including review of all expenditures of bond proceeds by a citizens’ oversight committee, and annual reports. The citizens’ oversight committee, composed of citizens appointed by the Council, will ensure the bond proceeds are spent for their authorized purposes, and will submit a written report to the Council and the public on the bond expenditures.
Section 3. No Administrators’ Salaries . Proceeds from the sale of the bonds authorized by the City’s measure shall be used only to construct, repair and replace the public improvements specified in the measure, and not for any other purpose, including administrators' salaries or other operating expenses. By law, all funds can only be spent on municipal improvements.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 2nd day of July 2024 by the following vote:
AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES, COUNCIL MEMEBRS:
ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Anita, Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
ATTEST:
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
4 June 27, 2024 Item No. 13d
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the City Council of July 2, 2024
CITY COUNCIL OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2024-, ESTABLISHING THE
CITY OF MARINA SPECIAL TAX DISTRICT FINANCING CODE AS
CHAPTER 3.35 OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider:
1. Opening a public hearing and introduce Ordinance No. 2024-, establishing the City of Marina Special District Financing Code as Chapter 3.35 of the City of Marina Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council had previously approved a Development and Disposition Agreement (“DDA”) with Marina Community Partners (“MCP”) back in 2005 for the transfer of property from the City to MCP for The Dunes Development. A key component of the DDA was a provi sion requiring The Dunes Development be “Fiscally Neutral” to the City. In 2015, the City formed Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (“Dunes CFD”) to levy a special tax to fund all or a part of the public services (the “Services”) required to maintain infrastructure to be owned by the City at The Dunes Development. The City has been levying special taxes since 2015 to pay for services for The Dunes Development.
The City has received a petition from MCP requesting the City to create a new Community Facilities District to be designated City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 20 24-1 (the “Dunes West Side Services CFD”) to levy a special tax to fund all or a part of the public services (the “ West Side Services”) required to maintain infrastructure at The Dunes West Side Development.
MCD has requested that the Dunes West Side Services CFD authorize the use of special tax revenues to pay the cost of maintaining certain facilities that will be owned by a private property owners association and made available for public access and use, including a common area/public plaza and restroom facilities.
ANALYSIS:
The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the “Mello -Roos Act”) does not expressly permit the use of CFD special taxes to pay for maintenance of privately-owned common area/public plaza facilities and restrooms; however, as a chartered city, the City of Marina has the authority to adopt the Mello-Roos Act into the City’s Municipal Code with such modifications as the City Council deems to be appropriate. Ac cordingly, the Ordinance submitted to the City Council herewith incorporates the Mello-Roos Act into the Marina Municipal Code by reference and provides that, in addition to the services authorized to be financed by a community facilities district as described in Section 53313 of the Mello-Roos Act, a community facilities district formed under the Marina Municipal Code may finance: “Maintenance and lighting of publicly-accessible plazas and courtyards, including landscaping and public art, and publicly -accessible restroom facilities, including such areas and facilities that are owned by a private entity, if the facilities are 1 made accessible to the public pursuant to a contractual agreement with the City of Marina, recorded covenants, conditions and restrictions or conditions of land use entitlements .” The proposed Ordinance also makes certain modifications to the Mello -Roos Act to benefit the City and streamline the formation of community facilities districts in the future.
At tonight’s City Council meeting there will be a separate resolution prepared by Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP, the City’s Bond Counsel, approving a reimbursement agreement with MCD under which MCD will advance certain costs of formation of the Dunes West Side Services CFD.
Legal Documents
Ordinance – The Ordinance adds Chapter 3.35 to the Marina Municipal Code, incorporating the Mello-Roos Act into the Marina Municipal Code by reference with certain modifications described above and more particularly set forth in the Ordinance submitted herewith.
Future Actions
If the City Council holds first reading of the Ordinance on July 2, 2024, second reading of the Ordinance will be scheduled for the August 7 City Council meeting. The Ordinance will be published in a newspaper within 15 days of its second reading and will become effective 30 days following second reading.
Based on the proposed Dunes West Side Services CFD formation schedule, the following formation legal actions are scheduled as follows:
Resolution of Intention – The Resolution of Intention will be considered at the August 7 th City Council meeting and will do the following: a) accepts the petition filed by Shea with respect to the Dunes West Side Services CFD; b) declares the intention of the City to form the Dunes West Side Services CFD and the Future Annexation Area; (c) describes the territories within the boundaries of the Dunes West Side Services CFD, and the Future Annexation Area; d) describes the types of services that will be funded by special taxes; e) describes the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes to be levied in the Dunes West Side Services CFD; f) calls a public hearing to be held on September 17, 2024; and g) describes the proposed voting procedures for the Dunes West Side Services CFD.
Resolution of Formation – The Resolution of Formation Public Hearing will be held on September 17th. The formation of the Dunes West Side Services CFD will occur after the public hearing . At that hearing, the City Council will be presented with information regarding the Dunes West Side Services CFD, the special taxes, and public services. The public will also have the opportunity to comment on the Dunes West Side Services CFD. After the conclusion of the September 17th public hearing the City Council may take the following actions:
1. Adopt a resolution establishing the Dunes West Side Services CFD
2. Call a special election
3. Conduct the election
4. Adopt a resolution declaring the results of the election.
5. Introduce for first reading an ordinance authorizing the levy of special taxes Additionally, the City Council will consider a Services Funding Agreement outlining the terms whereby MCP agrees to make up any shortfall incurred during the project build -out period and outlines the arrangement between the City and the Dunes Promenade Commercial Association to maintain the Village Square infrastructure to be constructed at the Promenade. 2 The adoption of the Resolution approving the Reimbursement Agreement under consideration this evening will not commit the City Council to establish Dunes West Side Services CFD nor authorize the levy of special taxes. The City Council may establish Dunes West Side Services CFD only after conducting the September 17th public hearing, and may levy the special taxes only if the result of the special election show 2/3rds approval. Following the September 17th public hearing and landowner election, the proposed schedule to complete the formation of the Dunes West Side Services CFD is as follows:
October 1, 2024: Second Reading of ordinance authorizing special tax levy November 1, 2024: Special Tax Ordinance becomes effective The resolutions and related documents have been prepared and reviewed by the City’s consultant team, which includes bond counsel (Stradling), municipal advisor (Fieldman, Rolapp and Associates) and special tax consultant (Goodwin Consulting).
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact resulting from the adoption of City of Marina Special District Financing Code as Chapter 3.35 of the City of Marina Municipal Code.
CONCLUSION:
This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action. _____________________
Vanessa S.
Legbandt
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP
Special Counsel for
City of Marina
REVIEWED/CONCUR:
_____________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina
_____________________
René A. Ortega
City Attorney
City of Marina
Attachments:
Ordinance Adopting Mello-Roos Act, as modified
3 4866-5767-4695v4/202027-0001
CITY OF MARINA
COUNTY OF MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 2024-__
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MARINA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE
MARINA SPECIAL TAX DISTRICT FINANCING CODE AS
CHAPTER 3.35 OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, constituting Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the “Mello -Roos Act”) allows for the financing of various facilities and services by means of the formation of community facilities districts and the levy of special taxes on property in the community facilities districts; and WHEREAS, the City has been requested to form a community facilities district to finance the cost of services, including maintenance of certain facilities that will be owned by private entities and made available for access and use by the public; however, the Mello-Roos Act does not currently expressly allow for the financing of such costs; and
WHEREAS, because the City is a chartered city, it has the power to adopt its own laws governing its municipal affairs; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide a means to finance the cost of maintenance of privately-owned facilities that are available for public access and use , the City Council desires to add to the City’s Municipal Code, as Chapter 3.35 thereof, the Marina Special Tax District Financing Code, which will incorporate the provisions of the Mello-Roos Act, but also include the power of a community facilities district to finance the cost of maintenance of certain facilities that will be owned by private entities and made available for access and use by the public, and otherwise modify certain provisions of the Mello- Roos Act to allow for a more efficient process to establish a special tax community facilities district.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 3.35 is hereby added to the Marina Municipal Code as follows:
Chapter 3.35
MARINA SPECIAL TAX DISTRICT FINANCING CODE
Sections:
3.35.010 Findings and intent.
3.35.020 Incorporation of Mello-Roos Act.
3.35.030 Additional Powers of Community Facilities Districts.
3.35.040 Provisions of Mello-Roos Act that are not applicable.
3.35.050 Provisions of the Mello-Roos Act that are modified.
ATTACHMENT
4 Ordinance No. ____
Establishing Special Tax District Financing Code
[August 7, 2024]
4866-5767-4695v4/202027-0001
3.35.010 Findings and Intent.
(A) The City Council finds that the provision of publicly-accessible community spaces in the City of Marina and other publicly-accessible facilities is of primary importance to the health and welfare of the residents of the City of Marina; and that the provision of such community spaces and facilities and restrooms is sometimes more efficiently provided by private property owners and community associations; and that the provision of publicly-accessible community spaces and publicly-accessible facilities and restrooms is a municipal purpose. (B) The City Council finds that the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, constituting Sections 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the “Mello- Roos Act”) provides for the financing of certain public improvements and municipal se rvices needed for developing areas in the State of California, but does not expressly provide for the financing of the cost of maintenance of privately -owned facilities being made available for access and use by the public pursuant to a contractual agreeme nt with the City of Marina , recorded covenants, conditions and restrictions or conditions of land use entitlements. (C) The City Council desires to provide a means to finance the cost of maintenance of privately-owned facilities being made available for access and use by the public pursuant to a contractual agreement with the City of Marina, recorded covenants, conditions and restrictions or conditions of land use entitlements, and to otherwise provide for an efficient means to form community facilities districts under the Mello-Roos Act, as included in this Chapter 3.35 and as otherwise supplemented and amended hereby.
3.35.020 Incorporation of Mello-Roos Act.
(A) Except as provided in this Chapter 3.35, the provisions of the Mello -Roos Act are by this reference incorporated herein.
(B) In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Chapter 3.35 and the provisions of the Mello-Roos Act or any other provision of law, the provisions of this Chapter 3.35 shall prevail.
3.35.030 Additional Powers of Community Facilities Districts. (A) In addition to the services authorized to be financed by a community facilities district as described in Section 53313 of the Mello -Roos Act, a community facilities district formed under the provisions of this Chapter 3.35 may finance : Maintenance and lighting of publicly-accessible plazas and courtyards, including landscaping and public art, and publicly-accessible restroom facilities, including such areas and facilities that are owned by a private entity, if the facilities are made accessible to the public pursuant to a contractual agreement with the City of Marina, recorded covenants, conditions and restrictions or conditions of land use entitlements.
5 Ordinance No. ____
Establishing Special Tax District Financing Code
[August 7, 2024]
4866-5767-4695v4/202027-0001
3.35.040 Provisions of Mello-Roos Act that are not applicable. (A) Notwithstanding Section 3.35.020, the following provisions of the Mello -Roos Act shall not apply to community facilities districts formed under the authority of this Chapter 3.35, or otherwise to extensions of authorized facilities and services, changes in special taxes, annexations of territory, levies of special taxes, or the incurrence of bonded indebtedness with respect to community facilities districts formed under the authority of this Section 3.35 (all references below to Sections are to Sections of the California Government Code, as in effect on the date of adoption by the City Council of Ordinance No. ____): (i) Section 53312; (ii) Section 53332; (iii) Section 53333; and (iv) Section 53343.1.
(B) In addition to the foregoing, the portions of the following provisions of the Mello-Roos Act shall not apply to community facilities districts formed under the authority of this Chapter 3.35 (all references below to Sections are to Sections of the California Government Code, as in effect on the date of adoption by the City Council of Ordinance No. ____):
(i) the second to last paragraph of Section 53313; and
(ii) the last sentence of Section 53326(b).
3.35.050 Provisions of Mello-Roos Act that are modified. (A) Notwithstanding Section 3.35.020, the following provisions of the Mello -Roos Act shall apply, as modified as set forth below, to community facilities districts formed under the authority of this Chapter 3.35, or otherwise to extensions of authorized facilities and services, changes in special taxes, annexations of territory, levies of special taxes, or the incurrence of bonded indebtedness with respect to community facilities districts formed under the authority of this Section 3.35 (all references below to Sections are to Sections of the California Government Code, as in effect on the date of adoption by the City Council of Ordinance No. 1479):
(i) the reference to “not less than 30” in Section 53321(e) is hereby modified to be “not less than 10;”
(ii) the reference to “at least 90 days” in Section 53326(a) is hereby modified to be “at least 45 days;”
(iii) the reference to “not be less than 30” in Section 53334 and in Section 53339.3 is hereby modified to be “not to be less than 10;”
(iv) the reference to “pursuant to this chapter” in Section 53340(d) is hereby modified to be “pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act or Chapter 3.35 of the Marina Municipal Code;” and
6 Ordinance No. ____
Establishing Special Tax District Financing Code
[August 7, 2024]
4866-5767-4695v4/202027-0001
(v) the reference to “authorized by this chapter” in Section 53343 is hereby modified to be “authorized by the Mello -Roos Act or Chapter 3.35 of the Marina Municipal Code.”
SECTION 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase there of irrespective of the fact that any one (1) or more subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional, or invalid, or ineffective, provided the basic purposes of this Ordinance and the benefits to the City a nd the public are not substantially impaired.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance to be published or posted as required by law.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an Ordinance introduced at a regular city council meeting held on July 2, 2024, and passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on ___________, by the following vote:
AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
7 July 2, 2024 Item No: 13e
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 2, 2024
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 24-,
RECEIVING THE FEE STUDY U P D A T E B Y REVENUE & COST SPECIALISTS, LLC AND ADOPT NEW MASTER FEE SCHEDULE.
REQUEST:
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-, receiving the Fee Study Update; and
2. Adopt the new Master Fee Schedule and implement adjustments effective September 1, 2024
BACKGROUND:
The city conducted its last comprehensive user fee study in 2018, about six years ago, which identified the costs associated with providing non-tax supported services and assigned the fully burdened rate (i.e., direct labor costs as well as indirect costs) of each city position involved in delivery of those services. The purpose of the study is to ensure that the city identifies all costs associated with activities, including overhead, to determine the true cost of providing various city services. Over the past six years, the cost of providing services has increased due to inflation, salary and benefit and other operating cost increases even though the fees charged by the city have remained unchanged.
As part of the work program this year, the City Council authorized staff to undertake a comprehensive update to the various fees charged for non -tax supported services. The purpose of the study was to identify areas where tax dollars may be subsidizing “personal choice” services, and to ensure the fees charged do not exceed the cost of providing the service . Under State law, public agencies are entitled to recover the costs associated with providing certain services that are considered “personal choice.”
A “personal choice” service is defined as a service where the customer is identifiable, and the service is measurable. Examples of “personal choice” services include building permits, alarm permits, building plan checks . With limited ability to raise revenues, it is becoming increasingly important that the city fully recover its costs for services provided, where appropriate.
A “user fee” is a charge for service provided by a governmental agency to the public . Several laws such as Propositions 4,13,26 and 218 set parameters under which the user fees can be established and administered by local government. User fees charged by local agencies may not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged .
Local governments have broad authority to implement user fees that reasonably recover the costs of their operations.
To determine the actual costs of providing services and ensure the fees charged do not exceed the costs, the city contracted with Revenue and Cost Specialists LLC (RCS), an expert in the industry for local governments for 44 years, to perform a Fee Study update.
1 1
RCS held numerous meetings involving each department over six months to gather data, confirm the actual amount of time each employee spends providing each service. Schedules were developed to identify the costs for labor, benefits, overhead and materials to calculate a true cost of service. The fees are designed to recover the City’s costs for providing services without a “profit .” Therefore, not all fees automatically increased; some fees adjusted lower based on less staff time or changes in the level of staff providing the service . New services were added, and obsolete services were deleted. Determining the cost of services ensures that fees recover only costs reasonably borne, as established by Section 8(c) of Proposition 4, now article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
ANALYSIS:
The following link is to the comprehensive F ee Study update (447 pages) which provides the detailed information in the calculation of the fee and provides the cost of fee-based services and makes cost recovery recommendations. The Study provides detailed information on each user fee including unique reference number, description, department, staff performing service, unit cost, current fee, suggested fee , total cost of providing the services, and percentage subsidy.
The analysis of the proposed fees for services involved the following steps:
1. Departmental staff interviews in which the project team interviewed staff to obtain a general knowledge base for the structure of the City’s existing fee schedule.
2. Data was collected for each service item, including labor time estimates, and current or potential volume for each service.
3. All budgeted costs and staffing levels for Fiscal Year 2023 -2024 were entered into the consultant’s analytical software to produce a model for allocation of overhead.
4. The full cost of providing each service included in the fee schedule was established .
Department and city management reviewed the results; cross checks were performed to assure the validity of the data.
The City Council has previously set the level of cost recovery for most fees at 100% of fully burdened rates for most services . However, there are some services, such as those related to recreation, cultural events, public safety or set by the State which the council has made the decision to subsidize with taxpayer revenues. As such, this proposed Master Fee Schedule reflects varying rates of cost recovery .
tax supported services or subsidy . This shows the current fee framework where about 43% of costs to be recover ed are collected overall citywide . It indicates that the city could realize approximately $462,600 in additional new revenue if the recommendations provide d in the report are adopted and implemented.
EXHIBIT A is the proposed new Master Fee Schedule. EXHIBIT B is the Summary of Current and Proposed fees. EXHIBIT C is the Detail of Building and Safety fees. EXHIBIT D is the Detail of Recreation and Facility fees.
RCS will be present on July 2, 2024, to introduce the report and e x p l a i n the report methodology and answer questions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If the proposed fees are approved, it is estimated an additional $462,600 in revenue would be increased for the General Fund.
2 2
Respectfully submitted,
Laura Pruneda
Finance Director
City of Marina
REVIEWED/CONCUR:
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina
3 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA APPROVING THE
FEE SCHEDULE FOR CITY SERVICES
WHEREAS, on July 2, 2024, the City Council opened a public hearing and took testimony from members of the public regarding fees and service charges and the recommendations made in the Cost of Services Study prepared by Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing and a general explanation of the changes proposed was given in accordance with Government Code Section 6062a and there were no written requests for mailed notice of meetings or the public hearing on file with the City; and
WHEREAS, the cost of services benefiting individuals and not the entire community should be borne by the individuals receiving the service. Therefore, determining the cost of services ensures that fees recover only costs reasonably borne, as established by Section 8(c) of Proposition 4, now A rticle XIIIB of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, to the extent fee revenue does not cover the full cost of providing the service, the difference is subsidized by the City’s general fund tax dollars. The community benefits from subsidies for certain fees, and it is not found by the City Council that it is in the best interest of the community to charge full cost of recovery in all cases; and
WHEREAS, appropriate data has been available to the public since June 21, 2024, indicating the cost or estimated cost required to support the fees and charges for which changes are proposed; and
WHEREAS, on July 2, 2024, the City Council held a public hearing, for which notice was provided in accordance with Government Code Section 6062a, and took oral or written testimony from members of the public and information from staff regarding the Cost of Service Study for new, increased or confirmed service charges and fees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Marina does hereby:
1. Approve the “City of Marina Fee Schedule” for City services (EXHIBIT A). attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and direct that all new or increased fees and services charges shall take effect as of September 1, 2024, and existing fees and service charges shall remain in full force and effect until that time and are hereby restated.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 2nd day of July 2024, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 4
CITY OF MARINA
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
S-002 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $5,350 per application
S-003 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT $4,135 per application S-004 SITE & ARCH DESIGN REV-MINOR ADMIN $615 per application S-004A SITE & ARCH DESIGN REV-MAJOR ADMIN $1,010 per application S-005 SITE & ARCH DESIGN REV-DISCR $7,650 per application S-007 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
$1,820 per application
This fee is to be charged in addition to usual
fees for projects in the Coastal Zone
S-009 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENT
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-010 COASTAL DEVELOP. PERMIT EXEMPTION $265 per application S-011 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-013 SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEW
Minor - $5,000 Deposit and Fee Agreement
with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly
Rates for all personnel involved plus any
outside costs.
Major - $20,000 Deposit and Fee Agreement
with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly
Rates for all personnel involved plus any
outside costs.
S-014 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
Minor - $5,000 Deposit and Fee Agreement
with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly
Rates for all personnel involved plus any
outside costs.
Major - $20,000 Deposit and Fee Agreement
with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly
Rates for all personnel involved plus any
outside costs.
S-015 ZONING TEXT/MAP AMENDMENT
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-016 VARIANCE APPLICATION
Minor - $2,540 per application
Major - $5,075 per application
S-016A OBJECTIVE STANDARDS MULTIFAMILY REV $2,540 per application S-016B PRE-APPROVED ADU PLANNING REVIEW
$210 per application
Building fees are in addition to this fee.
S-017 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved and any outside costs,
including City Attorney and consultants.
REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
UNIT REVENUE Page 1 of 11
EXHIBIT A
5 REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
S-018 ANNEXATION REVIEW
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-019 ENVIRONMENTAL NEG DECLARATION
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-020 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REV
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-021 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP $6,195 per map
S-022 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
5-20 lots - $12,650 per map
20+ lots - Deposit and fee agreement with
charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for
all personnel involved and any outside costs.
S-023 TENTATIVE MAP AMENDMENT
Administrative - $2,830 per application
Council - $6,685 per application
S-024 FINAL PARCEL MAP $7,225 per map
S-025 FINAL TRACT MAP
$10,000 deposit and fee agreement with
charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for
all personnel involved and any outside costs.
S-026 FINAL MAP AMENDMENT $5,460 per application
S-031 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $4,425 per application
S-031A LOT MERGER $4,425 per application
S-034 REVERSION TO ACREAGE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-035 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
$2,245 per application or a deposit as
determined by staff
S-036 ADMIN.CONSIST DETERM REQ. TO FORA
This fee should be removed from the fee
schedule as the service is no longer provided.
S-037 LEGISL CONSIST DETERM REQ TO FORA
This fee should be removed from the fee
schedule as the service is no longer provided.
S-038 MINING PERMIT/RECLAMATION PLAN
This fee should be removed from the fee
schedule as the service is no longer provided.
S-039 SIGN PROGRAM REVIEW $3,410 per application
S-040 SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENT $2,575 per application
S-041 SIGN REVIEW - DISCRETIONARY $1,705 per application S-042 SIGN REVIEW - ADMINISTRATIVE
With Sign Program - $110 per application
Without Sign Program - $370 per application
S-043 TEMPORARY SIGN/BANNER REVIEW $50 per application
S-044 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
Minor - $960 per application
Major - $1,340 per application
S-044B MINOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS PERMIT $740 per application S-044C SIDEWALK VENDOR PERMIT $160 per permit
S-044D FOOD TRUCK PERMIT $475 per permit
S-045 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT $55 per application
UNIT REVENUE Page 2 of 11
EXHIBIT A
6 REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
S-046 TREE REMOVAL - ADMINISTRATIVE
This fee should be removed from the fee
schedule as it is now included in S-046A.
S-046A TREE REMOVAL
Tier 1 - $560 per application
Tier 2 - $1,500 deposit with charges at the
Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel
involved plus any outside costs.
Tier 3 - $3,000 deposit with charges at the
Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel
involved plus any outside costs.
S-047 STREET NAME/RE-NAME PROCESSING
This fee should be removed from the fee
schedule as the service is not provided.
S-048 BUILDING ADDRESS/RE-ADDRESS PROC. $1,065 per building S-049 TIME EXTENSION REVIEW
Administrative - $690 per application
Planning Commission - $760 per application
S-050 APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION
$2,075 per appeal
Appeal in the Coastal Zone - No Charge
S-051 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL
$2,780 per appeal
Appeal in the Coastal Zone - No Charge
S-051A ZONING CLEARANCE LETTER $210 per letter
S-051B PROPERTY HISTORY LETTER
$445 per letter plus actual cost for any time
spent over 2 hours.
S-051D PLANNING EXTRA MEETING $320 per meeting
S-051E PLANNING SPECIAL MEETING $645 per meeting
S-051F EXTRA PLAN REVIEW
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-051G MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING REVIEW
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-051H GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE
15% surcharge of all Building Division Permit
Fees
S-051I DEVELOPMENT TECH SURCHARGE 4% of all Building Permit fees S-051J DEVELOPMENT SCANNING $1.25 per sheet/cop
y
S-051K GIS PRINTOUT
$10 per request plus $2 per sheet or actual
costs
S-051L LANDSCAPE MAINT BOND PROCESSING
$220 per bond plus cost of one hour for City
Attorney
S-051M MITIGATION MONITORING
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-051N SHORT TERM RENTAL PERMIT
New - $160
Renewal - $115
S-052 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW
$650 per meeting or deposit as determined by
staff
100% of the fee for the first meeting will be
credited towards future fees for the same
project within six months of first meeting.
UNIT REVENUE Page 3 of 11
EXHIBIT A
7 REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
S-053 BUILDING INSPECTION/PLAN CHECK
These fees should be increased by 15%. See
Fee Detail in Appendix C
S-056 MOBILE HOME INSPECTION
This fee should be removed from the fee
schedule as the service is no longer provided.
S-057 TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY REVIEW
This fee should be removed here as it is
already included in Appendix C.
S-058 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY INSPECTION
$190 per permit plus $95 per each inspection
after the second inspection
S-058A USE OF ALTERNATE MATERIALS REVIEW $665 per application S-058B CASP REVIEW
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-058C APPEAL TO BOARD OF APPEALS $1,740 per appeal
S-059 CODE ENFORCEMENT
$100 per violation per day - First Violation
$200 per violation per day - Second Violation
within one year of the First Violation
$500 per violation per day - Each additional
violation within one year of the First Violation
$1,000 per violation per day - If 3 or more
violations have occurred of the same type of
violation
S-061 CURB AND/OR GUTTER INSPECTION
$580 per permit + $165 per 50 linear feet after
the first 50 linear feet
S-062 SIDEWALK INSPECTION
$580 per permit + $165 per 250 square feet
after the first 250 square feet
S-062A SIDEWALK RAMP INSPECTION
$580 per permit (maximum of two ramps per
permit)
S-063 DRIVEWAY APPROACH INSPECTION
Residential - $580 per permit
Commercial - $745 per permit
S-068 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
$1,680 per permit + $1,540 per 50 square feet
after the first 50 square feet
S-068B ENCROACHMENT INSPECTION - POTHOLING
$1,105 per permit plus $165 per location after
5 locations
S-069 NON-CONST ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070 EMERG BARR./WARNING DEVICE PLACEMNT
Charge the actual cost of all personnel and
equipment used.
S-070A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/INSP - RESID. $620 per permit S-070B TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/INSP-ART/COLL
$780 per permit plus $385 per each additional
day after the first day
S-070C TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/INSP-INTERSCT
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070D TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/INSP-MULT LOC
$555 per permit plus:
Residential Street - $110 per day
Arterial/Collector Street - $220 per day
S-070E TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/INSP-ROAD CLOS $1,955 per permit plus $415 per da y
S-070F TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT $250 per permit
UNIT REVENUE Page 4 of 11
EXHIBIT A
8 REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
S-070G STAGING R-O-W PERMIT
This fee should be removed from the fee
schedule as it is now included as part of S-069.
S-070I OVERWIDE/LONG/HEAVY LOAD PERMIT
These fees are set by the State:
The City should charge the current Caltrans
fee.
S-070J HAUL ROUTE PERMIT $1,070 per permit
S-070M PW - ADDITIONAL INSPECTION
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all
personnel used plus any outside costs.
S-070N PW - ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all
personnel used plus any outside costs.
S-070O ENGINEERING STUDY REVIEW
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070P IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070Q STREET/RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDON. REV.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070S IMPROVEMENT/GRADING PLAN REVIEW
Improvement/Grading Plans - Deposit based
on the valuation amounts below with charges
at the fully allocated hourly rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs:
$0-$500,000 Valuation - 2.75% of the
engineer's estimated valuation
$500,001-$1 million - 2.5% of the engineer's
estimated valuation over $500,000
$1 million+ - 1.5% of the engineer's estimated
valuation over $1 million
S-070T IMPROVEMENT/GRADING INSPECTIONS
Deposit of 10% of Engineer's Estimated
Valuation with charges at the Fully Allocated
Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and
any outside costs.
S-070U STORMWATER POLLUTION PREV. PLAN REV $1,320 per application S-070V STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW $1,320 per plan S-070
W APPEAL TO PW COMMISSION $3,265 per appeal
S-070X PUBLIC EASEMENT CREATION
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070Y PRIVATE EASEMENT CREATION $5,225 per application S-070Z RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-071 BLUEPRINT/MAP REPRODUCTION Actual costs as determined by staff S-071A BOND REDUCTION $4,260 per application
S-071B LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC REVIEW $3,475 per application UNIT REVENUE Page 5 of 11
EXHIBIT A
9 REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
PUBLIC SAFETY
S-076 CARD ROOM TECHNICIAN PERMIT
New - $135 per permit per year plus DOJ fees
Renewal - $75 per permit (no DOJ Fees)
S-076A CARDROOM ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT
New - $480 per application plus Livescan fees
Renewal - $270 per renewal plus Livescan fees
S-077 BINGO PERMIT
Remote Caller - $125 per permit
Other - $50 per permit (This fee is limited by
the State)
S-079 PUBLIC DISTURBANCE RESPONSE
First Response - No Charge
Each additional response - $200
S-080 POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE
First alarm within a calendar year - No Charge
Second alarm within calendar year - $200
3rd, 4th, and 5th alarm within a calendar year -
$250
each subsequent alarm within a calendar year -
$300
S-080A NEW POLICE ALARM REGISTRATION $25 per permit
S-080B ALARM REGISTRATION RENEWAL $20 per renewal
S-080C POLICE BACKGROUND CHECK $110 per application plus any DOJ fees S-081 DUI EMERGENCY ACCIDENT RESPONSE
Per Government Code Section 53155, charge
the actual costs incurred up to $12,000 per
response for all responding personnel
S-082 DUI ARREST
This fee should be removed from the fee
schedule.
S-083 MISDEMEANOR BOOKING PROCESSING $200 per booking
S-084 IMPOUNDED VEHICLE RELEASE $435 per vehicle
S-085 NON-IMPOUND VEHICLE RELEASE $160 per vehicle
S-086 VEHICLE EQUIP CORRECTION INSPECT.
$35 per inspection to be charged for all
inspections
S-087 VIN VERIFICATION $60 per request
UNIT REVENUE Page 6 of 11
EXHIBIT A
10 REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
S-088 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT
New Permit - $100
Renewal Permit - $25
Amended Permit - $10
Psychological testing costs are added to the
above fees up to $150
S-089 PARADE & ASSEMBLIES PERMIT
Minor - $485 per permit
Major - Deposit and Fee Agreement with
charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for
all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Garbage/Recycling Cans - $2 per set
Park Usage - $25 per hour
Street Parking Per Block:
$50/0-50 vehicles $100/51-100 vehicles
$150/101+ vehicles
plus the actual cost for all staff the day of the
event.
S-089A BLOCK PARTY PERMIT $200 per application
S-089B AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMIT $180 per application
S-091 RV OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMIT $20 per permit
S-092 RECORDS CHECK/CLEARANCE LETTER $80 per letter
S-093 FINGERPRINTING $35 per request plus DOJ Fees
S-095 POLICE DIGITAL COPY $20 per device
S-096 POLICE REPORT COPY $0.20 per page
S-098 POLICE SPECIAL SERVICES
Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved
S-098A TOW TRUCK BUSINESS REVIEW $410 per application
S-098B POLICE DANCE PERMIT $210 per application
S-098C POLICE ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT $210 per application S-098E FIREARM STORAGE $295 per case
S-098F VALET PARKING PERMIT $470 per application
S-100 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
Annual Dog License:
Spayed/Neutered - $25
Non-Spayed/Neutered - $100
Late Fee - $20
S-101 ANIMAL RELEASE/REDEMPTION
$50 per animal for first offense and $100 per
animal thereafter
S-104 KENNEL PERMIT $860 per application
S-105 FIRE ALARM PLAN CHECK
Single Family/Tenant Improvement -
$280
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-25 Devices - $280
Each Additional 25 Devices - $115
S-105A FIRE ALARM INSPECTION
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $280
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-25 Devices - $280
Each Additional 25 Devices - $225
UNIT REVENUE Page 7 of 11
EXHIBIT A
11 REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
S-106 FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $280
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-100 Heads - $280
Each Additional 100 Heads - $115
S-106A FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $560 (2
inspections)
Modular Building - $280 (1 inspection)
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-100 Heads - $560 (2 inspections)
Each Additional 50 Heads - $225
Over 300 Heads - Charge the Fully Allocated
Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus
any outside costs
S-107 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM - FIXED
Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-107A FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM - HOOD
Plan Check - $280
Inspection - $280
S-108 FIRE BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
$280 per plan or deposit with actual costs as
determined by staff
S-108A FIRE PHOTOVOLTAIC SYST. PLAN REVIEW $118 per plan S-109 FIRE BUSINESS INSPECTION - ANNUAL $195 per permit S-109A FIRE BUSINESS INSPECTION - NEW $280 per permit
S-112 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ANNUAL INSPECT
Underground/Aboveground tanks:
Operating Permit - $280 plus $115 for every
tank over 5
Change/Install - $280 plus $115 for every
tank over 1
Remove/Abandon - $225 plus $85 for every
tank over 1
All Other Hazardous Materials Permits - $280
per permit
S-113 STATE MANDATED INSPECTION
Care Facility: (These fees are set by the State)
1-25 persons - $50
26+ persons - $100
Other Occupancies - $280 plus $140 for each
floor after the first floor
Charge fully allocated hourly rate for any 2nd
re-inspections
For any inspections not identified charge the
Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for any time
involved.
S-114 ONE-TIME FIRE INSPECTION/PERMIT
$280 per permit
Over 1 Hour - Charge the Fully Allocated
Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus
any outside costs
UNIT REVENUE Page 8 of 11
EXHIBIT A
12 REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
S-115 PUBLIC FIREWORKS DISPLAY INSP/PRMT
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at
the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all
personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-116 ENGINE CO./PREV BUSINESS 2ND REINSP
$360 per inspection for the second
reinspection and every inspection thereafter
S-117 FIRE FALSE ALARM RESPONSE
First and Second Alarm within a 30 day period
- No Charge
Third alarm within a 30 day period - $150
4th and 5th alarm within a 30 day period -
$200
each subsequent alarm within a 30 day period
-
$250
S-118 FIRE FLOW TEST $195 per test
S-119 WEED ABATEMENT
Non-Compliance after 3rd Inspection - $415
Non-Compliance after 4th Inspection - $415
Lot Cleared - $670 plus the actual cost of
clearing
RECREATION
S-120 ADULT SPORTS
Softball:
Resident - $750 per team Non-Resident -
$900 per team
S-121 YOUTH SPORTS Resident - $30 Non-Resident - $60 S-121A TEEN CENTER
Membership:
Yearly: Resident - $53 Non-Resident - $75
6 Months: Resident - $30 Non-Resident -
$53
Summer Only: Resident - $23 Non-Resident
- $38
Daily: Resident - $5 Non-Resident - $8
50% of all children in the same family after the
first child
S-121B SENIOR CENTER
Membership:
Resident - $30
Non-Resident - $53
Special Events:
Resident - $8
Non-Resident - $8
UNIT REVENUE Page 9 of 11
EXHIBIT A
13 REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
S-121C YOUTH CENTER
Yearly Membership - $53 6 Months
Membership - $30
Summer/Breaks - $23 per week
Non-Resident:
Yearly - $75 6 Month - $53
Summer/Breaks - $38 per week
Daily: Resident - $5 Non-Resident - $8
7 Week Smart Start Programs: Members - $15
Non-Members - $53
Camps: Members - $30 Non-Members - $60
Non-Resident: 7 week Smart Start Programs -
$60 Camps - $83
50% off All Children in the Same Family After
Child 1
S-122 FACILITY/BALLFIELD RENTAL
Various fees
See Appendix D of this Report for detail
MAINTENANCE
S-123 SPECIAL PARKING PLACEMENT/REMOVAL
Collect a deposit and charge the Fully
Allocated Hourly Rates of any personnel
involved plus any material or outside costs
S-126 DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTY
Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates of any
personnel involved plus any material or
outside costs
ADMINISTRATION
S-128 NEW BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING
Located Outside of City Limits - $50 per
application
Located Within City Limits - $100 per
application
S-129 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL PROC. $20 per renewal
S-130 BUS. LIC. OWNER NAME/ADDRESS CHANGE $20 per account S-131 NSF CHECK PROCESSING $70 per NSF Chec
k
S-132 FILM PERMIT
Processing Fee: $255 per permit
Plus daily rental fee of facility
Plus actual cost for day of event
Plus any business license fees
S-134 COPY - ELECTRONIC FILE $6 per device
S-135 COPY - PRINTED DOCUMENTS
$0.20 per page
FPPC copies - $0.10 per page
Maps - $2 per page
S-136 LIFE CERTIFICATION $10 per certification
S-137 DOCUMENT CERTIFICATION $5 per document
UNIT REVENUE Page 10 of 11
EXHIBIT A
14 REF # SERVICE SUGGESTED FEE
S-138 NOTARY PUBLIC SERVICES
$15 per signature
This fee is set by the State
S-140 INITIATIVE PROCESSING
$200 per initiative
This fee is set by the State
S-141 CANDIDATE PROCESSING
This fee is set by the State:
$25 per candidate
FPPC Late Filing Fee - $10 per day for each day
a statement is late up to a maximum of $100
S-141A CHICKEN REGISTRATION $10 per application
S-150 CANNABIS PERMIT APPLICATION
Phase 1 - $6,305 per application
Phase 2 - $5,520 per application
Phase 3 - $4,580 per application
S-151 CANNABIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $13,165 per application S-152 CANNABIS LIVESCAN PROCESSING $75 per scan
S-153 CANNABIS ZONING VERIFICATION LETTER $415 per letter S-154 CANNABIS BACKGROUND REVIEW
New - $300
Renewal - $100
S-155 CANNABIS APPEAL PROCESSING $3,940 per appeal
S-156 CANNABIS PRE-LICENSE SITE VISIT $2,575 per visit
S-157 CANNABIS REGULATORY COMPLIANCE INSP $2,840 per annual inspection S-158 CANNABIS REINSPECTION $1,440 per reinspection
S-159 CANNABIS TAX AUDIT $10,670 per audit
S-160 ANNUAL RENTAL PROPERTY MONITORING $1,085 per property S-161 BELOW MARKET RATE CERTIFICATION
$310 per application plus actual cost of
outside consultant
S-162 BELOW MARKET NEW CONSTRUCTION SALES $1,995 per review S-163 BELOW MARKET REFINANCE TRANSACTION $1,530 per transaction S-164 BELOW MARKET RESALE TRANSACTION $1,995 per transaction UNIT REVENUE Page 11 of 11
EXHIBIT A
15 DETAIL OF
BUILDING & SAFETY FEES
437
EXHIBIT A
16 CITY OF MARINA SCHEDULE C-1
BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
CURRENT PROPOSED
SERVICE FEE FEE
Building Permit Issuance $43 $60
BUILDING PERMITS
Building Permit Under $500 Valuation $31 $36
Building Permit $501-$2,000 Valuation $31 + $3.87 for each $100 over $500 $36 + $4.40 for each $100 over $500 Building Permit $2,001-$25,000 Valuation $89 + $17.74 for each $1,000 over $2,000 $102 + $20.43 for each $1,000 over $2,000 Building Permit $25,001-$50,000 Valuation $497 + $12.92 for each $1,000 over $25,000 $572 + $14.84 for each $1,000 over $25,000 Building Permit $50,001-$100,000 Valuation $820 + $8.88 for each $1,000 over $50,000 $943 + $10.22 for each $1,000 over $50,000 Building Permit $100,001-$500,000 Valuation $1,264 + $6.92 for each $1,000 over $100,000 $1,454 + $7.96 for each $1,000 over $100,000 Building Permit $500,001-$1,000,000 Valuation $4,033 + $5.93 for each $1,000 over $500,000 $4,638 + $6.82 for each $1,000 over $500,000 Building Permit Over $1,000,000 Valuation $7,000 + $4.19 for each $1,000 over $1,000,000 $8,048 + $4.82 for each $1,000 over $1,0 00,000
BUILDING PLAN CHECK
Building Plan Check Under $500 Valuation $20 $23
Building Plan Check $501-$2,000 Valuation $20 + $2.53 for each $100 over $500 $23 + $2.93 for each $100 over $500 Building Plan Check $2,001-$25,000 Valuation $58 + $11.52 for each $1,000 over $2,000 $67 + $13.22 for each $1,000 over $2,000 Building Plan Check $25,001-$50,000 Valuation $323 + $8.40 for each $1,000 over $25,000 $371 + $9.68 for each $1,000 over $25,000 Building Plan Check $50,001-$100,000 Valuation $533 + $5.78 for each $1,000 over $50,000 $613 + $6.64 for each $1,000 over $50,000 Building Plan Check $100,001-$500,000 Valuation $822 + $4.50 for each $1,000 over $100,000 $945 + $5.17 for each $1,000 over $100,000 Building Plan Check $500,001-$1,000,000 Valuation $2,621 + $3.86 for each $1,000 over $500,000 $3,013 + $4.44 for each $1,000 over $500,000 Building Plan Check Over $1,000,000 Valuation $4,549 + $1.13 for each $1,000 over $1,000,000 $5,233 + $1.30 for each $1,000 over $1,000,000 MISCELLANEOUS:
Window Changeout - SFR $198 $228
Exterior Siding - SFR $198 $228
Re-Roof:
SFR $198 $228
Non-SFR $242 $276
Miscellaneous Building Permit $277 $315
Demolition Permit $161 $190
Duplicate Inspection Card $43 $61
Duplicate Certificate of Occupancy $43 $61
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy $43 $61
Other Inspections not specified $133 $144
Overtime Inspection (4 hour minimum) OT Hourly Rate OT Hourly Rate Additional Plan Review Hourly Rate Hourly Rate
Expedited Plan Review in addition to regular Plan Review Fee OT Hourly Rate OT Hourly Rate Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate
EXHIBIT A
17 CITY OF MARINA SCHEDULE C-2
BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
2024
CURRENT PROPOSED
Permit Issuance $43 $60
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
Electrical Sign $213 $251
Power Apparatus $207 $247
Temporary Power Pole $194 $233
Services, Switchboards, Control Centers, & Panels
SFR $260 $345
Non-SFR $260 $315
Pole or Platform Mounted Fixtures (Every 5 Lights) $342 $393 Recept, Switch, Lighting Outlet, and Lighting Fixture, per fixture First 10 items $254 $291
Each item over 10 $4 $5
Combo Permit: EV Charging Station $277 $315
Combo Permit: Swimming Pool
SFR $593 $672
Non-SFR $827 $926
Combo Permit: In-Ground Spa
SFR $421 $479
Non-SFR $540 $609
Combo Permit: Solar System
SFR $277 $315
Non-SFR $421 $479
Meter Reset $198 $228
Miscellaneous Electrical Permit $132 $158
PLUMBING PERMITS
Backflow Protection Device $109 $133
Expansion Tank $109 $133
Miscellaneous Plumbing Permit $132 $158
MECHANICAL PERMITS
Commercial Air Handling Unit (Per Unit) $403 $467
Independent Venting System $403 $467
Type I & II Hood served by Mechanical Exhaust $403 $467 Miscellaneous Mechanical Permit $132 $158
Inspections not specified $132 $144
Reinspections $132 $144
After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum) Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Plan Check - 100% of Permit Fee
Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate
EXHIBIT A
18 DETAIL OF
RECREATION
FACILITY & FIELD FEES
443
EXHIBIT A
19 Recreation Facility Rental Fees
Field Use, Athletic Events
CLASS I
A. Community Youth Groups - Any organized youth group which is non-profit, has a majority of members who are Marina residents age 17 years and under, has volunteer adult leaders or chaperones, is recreational in nature, has no membership restrictions other than age and gender, has a defined organizational structure, meets regularly, and is primarily interested in serving school-age youth of the community.
B. Community Adult Groups - Any organized group which is non-profit, has a majority of members who are Marina residents, is recreational in nature, has no membership restrictions other than age and gender, has a defined organizational structure and meets regularly.
C. Resident Use, Private - Any resident group or individual not meeting the requirements of another class which wishes to use a facility(s) for private recreational activities.
C u r r e n t F e e s P r o p o s e d F e e s
Field Use, Per Hour $15 $25
Field Prep $30 $45
Lights, Per Hour $30 $45
S t a f f , P e r H o u r F B H R F B H R
Restrooms $50 $75
Deposit $150 $150
$100 Non-refund cancel fee $100 Non-refund cancel fee
Concession Stand $50 per day $75 per day
$150 per season $225 per season
Electronic Scoreboard $100 Deposit $100 Deposit
CLASS II
A. Commercial Use - Groups or organizations that are, by their nature, commercial or profit oriented.
B. Non-resident - Any
non-resident grou
p or individual not meeting the requirements of another class, which wishes to use a facility for private recreational activities.
C u r r e n t F e e s P r o p o s e d F e e s
Field Use, Per Hour $30 $45
Field Prep $30 $45
Lights, Per Hour $30 $45
S t a f f , P e r H o u r F B H R F B H R
Restrooms $50 $75
Deposit $250 $250
$150 Non-refund cancel $150 Non-refund cancel
Concession Stand $75 per day $115 per day
$200 per season $300 per season
Electronic Scoreboard $100 Deposit $100 Deposit
Park Field Use $25 $40
Park Rental Restroom Use $50 $75
EXHIBIT A
20 Recreation Facility Rental Fees
ROCKY HAN COMMUNITY CENTER
C u r r e n t F e e s P r o p o s e d F e e s
Resident $30/hr $45/hr
Resident Nonprofit $20/hr $30/hr
C i t y S p o n s o r e d $ 0 $ 0
Nonresident $50/hr $75/hr
Nonresident Nonprofit $40/hr $60/hr
Damage Deposit $500 $500
Facility Maintenance Fee $100 $150
Sanitation Fee $200 $300
Kitchen Fee $35 $55
Event Permit $40 $60
Admin Rental Service Fee $50 $75
VINCE DIMAGGIO PARK FIRESIDE ROOM
C u r r e n t F e e s P r o p o s e d F e e s
Resident $25/hr $40/hr
Resident Nonprofit $20/hr $30/hr
C i t y S p o n s o r e d $ 0 $ 0
Nonresident $30/hr $45/hr
Nonresident Nonprofit $25/hr $40/hr
Damage Deposit $250 $250
Facility Maintenance Fee $75 $115
Sanitation Fee $100 $150
Kitchen Fee $25 $40
Event Permit $40 $60
Admin Rental Service Fee $50 $75
Special Event Grounds Use Only $125 $190
Small Family Group (20 or less)
Grounds Use Only $25 per day $38 per day
SCOUT BUILDING AT GLORYA JEAN TATE PARK
C u r r e n t F e e s P r o p o s e d F e e s
Resident $25/hr $40/hr
Resident Nonprofit $20/hr $30/hr
C i t y S p o n s o r e d $ 0 $ 0
Nonresident $35/hr $55/hr
Nonresident Nonprofit $30/hr $45/hr
Damage Deposit $250 $250
Facility Maintenance Fee $75 $115
Sanitation Fee $100 $150
Kitchen Fee $25 $40
Event Permit $40 $60
Admin Rental Service Fee $50 $75
Special Event Grounds Use Only $125 $190
Small Family Group (20 or less)
Grounds Use Only $25 per day $40 per day
EXHIBIT A
21 Recreation Facility Rental Fees
WENDY HILL COMMUNITY PARK
C u r r e n t F e e s P r o p o s e d F e e s
Damage Deposit $200 $300
Event Permit $40 $60
Admin Rental Service Fee $25 $40
Special Event Grounds Use Only $125 $190
Small Family Group (20 or less)
Grounds Use Only $25 per day $40 per day
MARINA SKATE PARK
C u r r e n t F e e s P r o p o s e d F e e s
Damage Deposit $200 $300
Event Permit $40 $60
Admin Rental Service Fee $25 $40
Special Event Grounds Use Only $125 $190
Small Family Group (20 or less)
Grounds Use Only $25 per day $40 per day
MARINA TEEN CENTER
C u r r e n t F e e s P r o p o s e d F e e s
Resident $30/hr $45/hr
Resident Nonprofit $20/hr $30/hr
C i t y S p o n s o r e d $ 0 $ 0
Nonresident $50/hr $75/hr
Nonresident Nonprofit $40/hr $60/hr
Damage Deposit $500 $500
Facility Maintenance Fee $100 $150
Sanitation Fee $200 $300
Kitchen Fee $35 $55
Event Permit $40 $60
Admin Rental Service Fee $50 $75
MARINA YOUTH CENTER
C u r r e n t F e e s P r o p o s e d F e e s
Resident $25/hr $40/hr
Resident Nonprofit $20/hr $30/hr
C i t y S p o n s o r e d $ 0 $ 0
Nonresident $35/hr $55/hr
Nonresident Nonprofit $30/hr $45/hr
Damage Deposit $250 $250
Facility Maintenance Fee $75 $115
Sanitation Fee $100 $150
Kitchen Fee $25 $40
Event Permit $40 $60
Admin Rental Service Fee $50 $75
Special Event Grounds Use Only $125 $190
Small Family Group (20 or less)
Grounds Use Only $25 per day $40 per day
EXHIBIT A
22 Recreation Facility Rental Fees
Liability Insurance (requirement): Insurance is available for purchase through the City.
Liability Insurance:
1-50 people $102.24 $155
51-150 people $109.46 $165
151-250 people $128.04 $195
251-500 people $150.74 $230
Liquor Liability Insurance:
1-50 people $15.48 $25
51-150 people $20.64 $30
151-250 people $20.64 $30
251-500 people $20.64 $30
Alcoholic Beverage Permit Fee $300 $450
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
T a b l e s $ 5 $ 8
Table Deposit:
1-20 Tables $50 $75
21-40 Tables $75 $115
41+ Tables $100 $150
Chairs, Off-Site Rental $1 per chair $2 per chair
Chair Deposit:
1-20 Chairs $50 $75
21-40 Chairs $75 $115
41+ Chairs $100 $150
Audio System (Civic Center) $50 $75
Audio System (Portable) $50 $75
Audio System Deposit $200 $200
Alcoholic Beverage Permit $300 $450
Over 100 Attendees FBHR FBHR
EXHIBIT A
23 APPE
NDIX A
SUMMARY
OF
CURRENT FEES
AND
PROPOSED FEES
17 EXHIBIT B
24 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-002 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,350 per application$5,350 per application
S-003 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$4,135 per application$4,135 per application
S-004 SITE & ARCH DESIGN REV-MINOR ADMINREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$615 per application$340 per application
S-004A SITE & ARCH DESIGN REV-MAJOR ADMINREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,010 per application$1,010 per application
S-005 SITE & ARCH DESIGN REV-DISCRREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$7,650 per application$7,775 per application
S-007 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,820 per application
This fee is to be charged in addition to usual fees for projects in the Coastal Zone
$885 per application
This fee is to be charged in addition to usual fees for projects in the Coastal Zone
June 21, 2024
1 18
EXHIBIT B
25 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-009 LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMENDMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-010 COASTAL DEVELOP. PERMIT EXEMPTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$265 per application$255 per application
S-011 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-013 SPECIFIC PLAN REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Minor - $5,000 Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Major - $20,000 Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and any outside costs.
S-014 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Minor - $5,000 Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Major - $20,000 Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and any outside costs.
S-015 ZONING TEXT/MAP AMENDMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
June 21, 2024
2 19
EXHIBIT B
26 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-016 VARIANCE APPLICATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Minor - $2,540 per application
Major - $5,075 per application
$4,745 per application
S-016A OBJECTIVE STANDARDS MULTIFAMILY REVREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,540 per applicationNone
S-016B PRE-APPROVED ADU PLANNING REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$210 per application
Building fees are in addition to this fee.
None
S-017 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and any outside costs, including City Attorney and consultants.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and any outside costs, including City Attorney and consultants.
S-018 ANNEXATION REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-019 ENVIRONMENTAL NEG DECLARATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
June 21, 2024
3 20
EXHIBIT B
27 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-020 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REVREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-021 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$6,195 per map$3,845 per map
S-022 TENTATIVE TRACT MAPREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
5-20 lots - $12,650 per map
20+ lots - Deposit and fee agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and any outside costs.
5-20 lots - $7,925 per map
20+ lots - Deposit and fee agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and any outside costs.
S-023 TENTATIVE MAP AMENDMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Administrative - $2,830 per application
Council - $6,685 per application
Administrative - $3,015 per application
Council - $5,005 per application
S-024 FINAL PARCEL MAPREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$7,225 per map$3,135 per map
S-025 FINAL TRACT MAPREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10,000 deposit and fee agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and any outside costs.
Administrative - $3,380 per map
Council - $5,000 deposit and fee agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and any outside costs.
June 21, 2024
4 21
EXHIBIT B
28 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-026 FINAL MAP AMENDMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,460 per application$1,365 per application
S-031 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$4,425 per application$2,870 per application
S-031A LOT MERGERREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$4,425 per application$2,870 per application
S-034 REVERSION TO ACREAGEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-035 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,245 per application or a deposit as determined by staff$1,250 per application or a deposit as determined by staff S-036 ADMIN.CONSIST DETERM REQ. TO FORAREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is no longer provided.
$1,010 per application
June 21, 2024
5 22
EXHIBIT B
29 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-037 LEGISL CONSIST DETERM REQ TO FORAREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is no longer provided.
$2,020 per application
S-038 MINING PERMIT/RECLAMATION PLANREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is no longer provided.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-039 SIGN PROGRAM REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,410 per application$2,945 per application
S-040 SIGN PROGRAM AMENDMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,575 per application$1,620 per application
S-041 SIGN REVIEW - DISCRETIONARYREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,705 per application$1,535 per application
S-042 SIGN REVIEW - ADMINISTRATIVEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
With Sign Program - $110 per application
Without Sign Program - $370 per application
With Sign Program - $110 per application
Without Sign Program - $285 per application
June 21, 2024
6 23
EXHIBIT B
30 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-043 TEMPORARY SIGN/BANNER REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$50 per application$30 per application
S-044 TEMPORARY USE PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Minor - $960 per application
Major - $1,340 per application
Minor - $485 per application
Major - $2,470 per application
S-044B MINOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$740 per application$285 per application
S-044C SIDEWALK VENDOR PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$160 per permitNone
S-044D FOOD TRUCK PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$475 per permitNone
S-045 HOME OCCUPATION PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$55 per application$65 per application
June 21, 2024
7 24
EXHIBIT B
31 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-046 TREE REMOVAL - ADMINISTRATIVEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as it is now included in S-046A.
$505 per application
S-046A TREE REMOVALREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Tier 1 - $560 per application
Tier 2 - $1,500 deposit with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Tier 3 - $3,000 deposit with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs. $1,335 per application plus $110 for every additional 10 trees after the first 10 trees
S-047 STREET NAME/RE-NAME PROCESSINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is not provided.
$205 per application
S-048 BUILDING ADDRESS/RE-ADDRESS PROC.REF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,065 per building$300 per building
S-049 TIME EXTENSION REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Administrative - $690 per application
Planning Commission - $760 per application
$690 per application
S-050 APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,075 per appeal
Appeal in the Coastal Zone - No Charge
$2,075 per appeal
June 21, 2024
8 25
EXHIBIT B
32 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-051 APPEAL TO CITY COUNCILREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,780 per appeal
Appeal in the Coastal Zone - No Charge
$2,780 per appeal
S-051A ZONING CLEARANCE LETTERREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$210 per letter$110 per letter
S-051B PROPERTY HISTORY LETTERREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$445 per letter plus actual cost for any time spent over 2 hours.$445 per letter plus actual cost for any time spent over 2 hours.
S-051D PLANNING EXTRA MEETINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$320 per meeting$345 per meeting
S-051E PLANNING SPECIAL MEETINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$645 per meeting$690 per meeting
S-051F EXTRA PLAN REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
June 21, 2024
9 26
EXHIBIT B
33 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-051G MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-051H GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
15% surcharge of all Building Division Permit Fees15% surcharge of all Building Division Permit Fees S-051I DEVELOPMENT TECH SURCHARGEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
4% of all Building Permit fees4% of all Building Permit fees This fee is not currently being charged.
S-051J DEVELOPMENT SCANNINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1.25 per sheet/copy$1.25 per sheet/copy
S-051K GIS PRINTOUTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 per request plus $2 per sheet or actual costs$10 per request plus $2 per sheet or actual costs S-051L LANDSCAPE MAINT BOND PROCESSINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$220 per bond plus cost of one hour for City Attorney$220 per bond plus cost of one hour for City Attorney June 21, 2024
10 27
EXHIBIT B
34 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-051M MITIGATION MONITORINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-051N SHORT TERM RENTAL PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
New - $160
Renewal - $115
New - $950
Renewal - $125
S-052 PRE-APPLICATION REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$650 per meeting or deposit as determined by staff
100% of the fee for the first meeting will be credited towards future fees for the same project within six months of first meeting. $480 per meeting or deposit as determined by staff
100% of the fee for the first meeting will be credited towards future fees for the same project within six months of first meeting.
S-053 BUILDING INSPECTION/PLAN CHECKREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
These fees should be increased by 15%. See Fee Detail in Appendix C
See Fee Detail in Appendix C
S-056 MOBILE HOME INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as the service is no longer provided.
$505 per permit
S-057 TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed here as it is already included in Appendix C.
$45 per application
May require a completion bond equal to the value of the remaining work.
June 21, 2024
11 28
EXHIBIT B
35 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-058 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$190 per permit plus $95 per each inspection after the second inspection
$185 per permit plus $90 per each inspection after the second inspection
S-058A USE OF ALTERNATE MATERIALS REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$665 per application$515 per application
S-058B CASP REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-058C APPEAL TO BOARD OF APPEALSREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,740 per appeal$1,365 per appeal
S-059 CODE ENFORCEMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$100 per violation per day - First Violation
$200 per violation per day - Second Violation within one year of the First Violation
$500 per violation per day - Each additional violation within one year of the First Violation
$1,000 per violation per day - If 3 or more violations have occurred of the same type of violation
$100 per violation per day - First Violation
$200 per violation per day - Second Violation within one year of the First Violation
$500 per violation per day - Each additional violation within one year of the First Violation
S-061 CURB AND/OR GUTTER INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$580 per permit + $165 per 50 linear feet after the first 50 linear feet
$355 per permit + $100 per 50 linear feet after the first 50 linear feet
June 21, 2024
12 29
EXHIBIT B
36 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-062 SIDEWALK INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$580 per permit + $165 per 250 square feet after the first 250 square feet
$355 per permit + $100 per 250 square feet after the first 250 square feet
S-062A SIDEWALK RAMP INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$580 per permit (maximum of two ramps per permit)None
S-063 DRIVEWAY APPROACH INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Residential - $580 per permit
Commercial - $745 per permit
Residential - $355 per permit
Commercial - $455 per permit
S-068 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,680 per permit + $1,540 per 50 square feet after the first 50 square feet
$585 per permit + $520 per 50 square feet after the first 50 square feet
S-068B ENCROACHMENT INSPECTION - POTHOLINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,105 per permit plus $165 per location after 5 locations$570 per permit plus $35 per location after 5 locations S-069 NON-CONST ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
June 21, 2024
13 30
EXHIBIT B
37 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-070 EMERG BARR./WARNING DEVICE PLACEMNTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the actual cost of all personnel and equipment used.Charge the actual cost of all personnel and equipment used.
S-070A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/INSP - RESID.REF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$620 per permit$380 per permit
S-070B TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/INSP-ART/COLLREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$780 per permit plus $385 per each additional day after the first day$405 per permit plus $195 per each additional day after the first day S-070C TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/INSP-INTERSCTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070D TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/INSP-MULT LOCREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$555 per permit plus:
Residential Street - $110 per day
Arterial/Collector Street - $220 per day
$340 per permit plus:
Residential Street - $65 per day
Arterial/Collector Street - $130 per day
S-070E TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN/INSP-ROAD CLOSREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,955 per permit plus $415 per day$660 per permit plus $130 per day June 21, 2024
14 31
EXHIBIT B
38 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-070F TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$250 per permit$155 per permit
S-070G STAGING R-O-W PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule as it is now included as part of S-069.
$780 per permit
S-070I OVERWIDE/LONG/HEAVY LOAD PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
These fees are set by the State:
The City should charge the current Caltrans fee.
These fees are set by the State:
$16 - Daily Permit
$90 - Annual Permit
S-070J HAUL ROUTE PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,070 per permit$395 per permit
S-070M PW - ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel used plus any outside costs.
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel used plus any outside costs.
S-070N PW - ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel used plus any outside costs.
Charge the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel used plus any outside costs.
June 21, 2024
15 32
EXHIBIT B
39 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-070O ENGINEERING STUDY REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070P IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070Q STREET/RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDON. REV.REF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070S IMPROVEMENT/GRADING PLAN REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Improvement/Grading Plans - Deposit based on the valuation amounts below with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs:
$0-$500,000 Valuation - 2.75% of the engineer's estimated valuation
$500,001-$1 million - 2.5% of the engineer's estimated valuation over $500,000
$1 million+ - 1.5% of the engineer's estimated valuation over $1 million
Improvement/Grading Plans - Deposit based on the valuation amounts below with charges at the fully allocated hourly rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs:
$0-$500,000 Valuation - 1.5% of the engineer's estimated valuation $500,001-$1 million - 1% of the engineer's estimated valuation over $500,000
$1 million+ - 0.75% of the engineer's estimated valuation over $1 million
S-070T IMPROVEMENT/GRADING INSPECTIONSREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit of 10% of Engineer's Estimated Valuation with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and any outside costs.
Deposit of 10% of Engineer's Estimated Valuation with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved and any outside costs.
June 21, 2024
16 33
EXHIBIT B
40 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-070U STORMWATER POLLUTION PREV. PLAN REVREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,320 per application$770 per application
S-070V STORMWATER MITIGATION PLAN REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,320 per plan$770 per plan
S-070W APPEAL TO PW COMMISSIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,265 per appeal$1,990 per appeal
S-070X PUBLIC EASEMENT CREATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-070Y PRIVATE EASEMENT CREATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,225 per application$2,425 per application
S-070Z RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
June 21, 2024
17 34
EXHIBIT B
41 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-071 BLUEPRINT/MAP REPRODUCTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Actual costs as determined by staff$10 per request plus $2 per sheet or actual costs as determined by staff
S-071A BOND REDUCTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$4,260 per application$2,580 per application
S-071B LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,475 per application$1,600 per application
S-076 CARD ROOM TECHNICIAN PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
New - $135 per permit per year plus DOJ fees
Renewal - $75 per permit (no DOJ Fees)
New - $100 per permit per year plus DOJ fees
Renewal - $100 per permit (no DOJ Fees)
S-076A CARDROOM ESTABLISHMENT PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
New - $480 per application plus Livescan fees
Renewal - $270 per renewal plus Livescan fees
New - $270 per application plus Livescan fees
Renewal - $270 per renewal plus Livescan fees
S-077 BINGO PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Remote Caller - $125 per permit
Other - $50 per permit (This fee is limited by the State) Remote Caller - $80 per permit
Other - $50 per permit (This fee is limited by the State) June 21, 2024
18 35
EXHIBIT B
42 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-079 PUBLIC DISTURBANCE RESPONSEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
First Response - No Charge
Each additional response - $200
First Response - No Charge
Each additional response - $150
S-080 POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
First alarm within a calendar year - No Charge
Second alarm within calendar year - $200
3rd, 4th, and 5th alarm within a calendar year - $250
each subsequent alarm within a calendar year - $300
First alarm within a calendar year - No Charge
Second alarm within calendar year - $150
3rd, 4th, and 5th alarm within a calendar year - $200
each subsequent alarm within a calendar year - $250
S-080A NEW POLICE ALARM REGISTRATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$25 per permit$25 per permit
S-080B ALARM REGISTRATION RENEWALREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$20 per renewal$20 per renewal
S-080C POLICE BACKGROUND CHECKREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$110 per application plus any DOJ fees$70 per application plus any DOJ fees S-081 DUI EMERGENCY ACCIDENT RESPONSEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Per Government Code Section 53155, charge the actual costs incurred up to $12,000 per response for all responding personnel Per Government Code Section 53155, charge the actual costs incurred up to $12,000 per response for all responding personnel June 21, 2024
19 36
EXHIBIT B
43 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-082 DUI ARRESTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee should be removed from the fee schedule.$745 per arrest plus current fee for County Booking Fee Section 29550.3(b) of the State Government Code allows for recovery of these costs if the arrested person is convicted of a related offense.
The City should only charge those individuals that are legally allowed to be charged.
S-083 MISDEMEANOR BOOKING PROCESSINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$200 per booking$145 per booking
S-084 IMPOUNDED VEHICLE RELEASEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$435 per vehicle$175 per vehicle
S-085 NON-IMPOUND VEHICLE RELEASEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$160 per vehicle$105 per vehicle
S-086 VEHICLE EQUIP CORRECTION INSPECT.REF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$35 per inspection to be charged for all inspections$20 per inspection to be charged for all inspections S-087 VIN VERIFICATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$60 per request$40 per request
June 21, 2024
20 37
EXHIBIT B
44 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-088 CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
New Permit - $100
Renewal Permit - $25
Amended Permit - $10
Psychological testing costs are added to the above fees up to $150 These fees are set by the State Penal Code Sections
12050-12054:
New Permit - $100
Renewal Permit - $25
Amended Permit - $10
Psychological testing costs are added to the above fees up to $150 S-089 PARADE & ASSEMBLIES PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Minor - $485 per permit
Major - Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Garbage/Recycling Cans - $2 per set
Park Usage - $25 per hour
Street Parking Per Block:
$50/0-50 vehicles $100/51-100 vehicles $150/101+ vehicles plus the actual cost for all staff the day of the event.
Minor - $265 per permit
Major - Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Garbage/Recycling Cans - $2 per set
Park Usage - $25 per hour
Street Parking Per Block:
$50/0-50 vehicles $100/51-100 vehicles $150/101+ vehicles plus the actual cost for all staff the day of the event.
S-089A BLOCK PARTY PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$200 per application$200 per application
S-089B AMPLIFIED SOUND PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$180 per application$60 per application
S-091 RV OVERNIGHT PARKING PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$20 per permit$13 per permit
June 21, 2024
21 38
EXHIBIT B
45 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-092 RECORDS CHECK/CLEARANCE LETTERREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$80 per letter$25 per letter
S-093 FINGERPRINTINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$35 per request plus DOJ Fees$25 per request plus DOJ Fees S-095 POLICE DIGITAL COPYREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$20 per device$10 per device
S-096 POLICE REPORT COPYREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$0.20 per page$0.20 per page
S-098 POLICE SPECIAL SERVICESREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involvedCharge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved S-098A TOW TRUCK BUSINESS REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$410 per application$265 per application
June 21, 2024
22 39
EXHIBIT B
46 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-098B POLICE DANCE PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$210 per application$75 per application
S-098C POLICE ENTERTAINMENT PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$210 per application$75 per application
S-098E FIREARM STORAGEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$295 per case$185 per case
S-098F VALET PARKING PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$470 per application$300 per application
S-100 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICESREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Annual Dog License:
Spayed/Neutered - $25
Non-Spayed/Neutered - $100
Late Fee - $20
Annual Dog License:
Spayed/Neutered - $12
Non-Spayed/Neutered - $24
Late Fee - $10
S-101 ANIMAL RELEASE/REDEMPTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$50 per animal for first offense and $100 per animal thereafter$25 per animal for first offense and $50 per animal thereafter June 21, 2024
23 40
EXHIBIT B
47 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-104 KENNEL PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$860 per application$570 per application
S-105 FIRE ALARM PLAN CHECKREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $280
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-25 Devices - $280
Each Additional 25 Devices - $115
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $240
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-25 Devices - $240
Each Additional 25 Devices - $95
S-105A FIRE ALARM INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $280
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-25 Devices - $280
Each Additional 25 Devices - $225
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $240
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-25 Devices - $240
Each Additional 25 Devices - $195
S-106 FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECKREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $280
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-100 Heads - $280
Each Additional 100 Heads - $115
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $240
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-100 Heads - $240
Each Additional 100 Heads - $95
S-106A FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $560 (2 inspections) Modular Building - $280 (1 inspection)
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-100 Heads - $560 (2 inspections)
Each Additional 50 Heads - $225
Over 300 Heads - Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
Single Family/Tenant Improvement - $430 (2 inspections) Modular Building - $240 (1 inspection)
Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial:
1-100 Heads - $240
Each Additional 50 Heads - $195
Over 300 Heads - Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
June 21, 2024
24 41
EXHIBIT B
48 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-107 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM - FIXEDREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-107A FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM - HOODREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Plan Check - $280
Inspection - $280
Plan Check - $240
Inspection - $240
S-108 FIRE BUILDING PLAN REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$280 per plan or deposit with actual costs as determined by staff$240 per plan or deposit with actual costs as determined by staff S-108A FIRE PHOTOVOLTAIC SYST. PLAN REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$118 per plan$117.40 per plan
S-109 FIRE BUSINESS INSPECTION - ANNUALREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$195 per permit$150 per permit
S-109A FIRE BUSINESS INSPECTION - NEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$280 per permit$240 per permit
June 21, 2024
25 42
EXHIBIT B
49 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-112 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ANNUAL INSPECTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Underground/Aboveground tanks:
Operating Permit - $280 plus $115 for every tank over 5 Change/Install - $280 plus $115 for every tank over 1
Remove/Abandon - $225 plus $85 for every tank over 1
All Other Hazardous Materials Permits - $280 per permit Underground/Aboveground tanks:
Operating Permit - $240 plus $95 for every tank over 5
Change/Install - $240 plus $95 for every tank over 1
Remove/Abandon - $200 plus $70 for every tank over 1
All Other Hazardous Materials Permits - $240 per permit S-113 STATE MANDATED INSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Care Facility: (These fees are set by the State)
1-25 persons - $50
26+ persons - $100
Other Occupancies - $280 plus $140 for each floor after the first floor
Charge fully allocated hourly rate for any 2nd re-inspections For any inspections not identified charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for any time involved.
Care Facility: (These fees are set by the State)
1-25 persons - $50
26+ persons - $100
Other Occupancies - $240 plus $120 for each floor after the first floor
Charge fully allocated hourly rate for any 2nd re-inspections For any inspections not identified charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for any time involved.
S-114 ONE-TIME FIRE INSPECTION/PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$280 per permit
Over 1 Hour - Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
$240 per permit
Over 1 Hour - Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs
S-115 PUBLIC FIREWORKS DISPLAY INSP/PRMTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
Deposit and Fee Agreement with charges at the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates for all personnel involved plus any outside costs.
S-116 ENGINE CO./PREV BUSINESS 2ND REINSPREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$360 per inspection for the second reinspection and every inspection thereafter
$270 per inspection for the second reinspection and every inspection thereafter
June 21, 2024
26 43
EXHIBIT B
50 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-117 FIRE FALSE ALARM RESPONSEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
First and Second Alarm within a 30 day period - No Charge Third alarm within a 30 day period - $150
4th and 5th alarm within a 30 day period - $200
each subsequent alarm within a 30 day period - $250
First and Second Alarm within a 30 day period - No Charge Third alarm within a 30 day period - $125
4th and 5th alarm within a 30 day period - $175
each subsequent alarm within a 30 day period - $225
S-118 FIRE FLOW TESTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$195 per test$150 per test
S-119 WEED ABATEMENTREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Non-Compliance after 3rd Inspection - $415
Non-Compliance after 4th Inspection - $415
Lot Cleared - $670 plus the actual cost of clearing
Non-Compliance after 3rd Inspection - $300
Non-Compliance after 4th Inspection - $300
Lot Cleared - $470 plus the actual cost of clearing
S-120 ADULT SPORTSREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Softball:
Resident - $750 per team Non-Resident - $900 per team Softball:
Resident - $500 per team Non-Resident - $600 per team S-121 YOUTH SPORTSREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Resident - $30 Non-Resident - $60Resident - $20 Non-Resident - $40 June 21, 2024
27 44
EXHIBIT B
51 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-121A TEEN CENTERREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Membership:
Yearly: Resident - $53 Non-Resident - $75
6 Months: Resident - $30 Non-Resident - $53
Summer Only: Resident - $23 Non-Resident - $38
Daily: Resident - $5 Non-Resident - $8
50% of all children in the same family after the first child Membership:
Yearly: Resident - $35 Non-Resident - $50
6 Months: Resident - $20 Non-Resident - $35
Summer Only: Resident - $15 Non-Resident - $25
Daily: Resident - $3 Non-Resident - $5
50% of all children in the same family after the first child S-121B SENIOR CENTERREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Membership:
Resident - $30
Non-Resident - $53
Special Events:
Resident - $8
Non-Resident - $8
Membership:
Resident - $20
Non-Resident - $35
Special Events:
Resident - $3
Non-Resident - $5
S-121C YOUTH CENTERREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Yearly Membership - $53 6 Months Membership - $30
Summer/Breaks - $23 per week
Non-Resident:
Yearly - $75 6 Month - $53 Summer/Breaks - $38 per week Daily: Resident - $5 Non-Resident - $8
7 Week Smart Start Programs: Members - $15 Non-Members - $53
Camps: Members - $30 Non-Members - $60
Non-Resident: 7 week Smart Start Programs - $60 Camps - $83 50% off All Children in the Same Family After Child 1
Yearly Membership - $35 6 Months Membership - $20
Summer/Breaks - $15 per week
Non-Resident:
Yearly - $50 6 Month - $35 Summer/Breaks - $25 per week Daily: Resident - $3 Non-Resident - $5
7 Week Smart Start Programs: Members - $10 Non-Members - $35
Camps: Members - $20 Non-Members - $40
Non-Resident: 7 week Smart Start Programs - $40 Camps - $55 50% off All Children in the Same Family After Child 1
S-122 FACILITY/BALLFIELD RENTALREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Various fees
See Appendix D of this Report for detail
Various fees
See Appendix E of this Report for detail
June 21, 2024
28 45
EXHIBIT B
52 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-123 SPECIAL PARKING PLACEMENT/REMOVALREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Collect a deposit and charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates of any personnel involved plus any material or outside costs Collect a deposit and charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates of any personnel involved plus any material or outside costs S-126 DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTYREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates of any personnel involved plus any material or outside costs
Charge the Fully Allocated Hourly Rates of any personnel involved plus any material or outside costs
S-128 NEW BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Located Outside of City Limits - $50 per application
Located Within City Limits - $100 per application
Located Outside of City Limits - $55 per application
Located Within City Limits - $110 per application
S-129 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL PROC.REF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$20 per renewal$40 per renewal
S-130 BUS. LIC. OWNER NAME/ADDRESS CHANGEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$20 per account$55 per account
Business List Printout - $70
S-131 NSF CHECK PROCESSINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$70 per NSF Check$35 per NSF Check
June 21, 2024
29 46
EXHIBIT B
53 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-132 FILM PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Processing Fee: $255 per permit
Plus daily rental fee of facility
Plus actual cost for day of event
Plus any business license fees
Processing Fee: $255 per permit
Plus daily rental fee of facility
Plus actual cost for day of event
Plus any business license fees
S-134 COPY - ELECTRONIC FILEREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$6 per device$5 per device
S-135 COPY - PRINTED DOCUMENTSREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$0.20 per page
FPPC copies - $0.10 per page
Maps - $2 per page
$0.20 per page
FPPC copies - $0.10 per page
Maps - $2 per page
S-136 LIFE CERTIFICATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 per certification$10 per certification
S-137 DOCUMENT CERTIFICATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5 per document$5 per document
S-138 NOTARY PUBLIC SERVICESREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$15 per signature
This fee is set by the State
$15 per signature
June 21, 2024
30 47
EXHIBIT B
54 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-140 INITIATIVE PROCESSINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$200 per initiative
This fee is set by the State
$200 per initiative
S-141 CANDIDATE PROCESSINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This fee is set by the State:
$25 per candidate
FPPC Late Filing Fee - $10 per day for each day a statement is late up to a maximum of $100
$25 per candidate
FPPC Late Filing Fee - $10 per day for each day a statement is late up to a maximum of $100
S-141A CHICKEN REGISTRATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 per application$10 per application
S-150 CANNABIS PERMIT APPLICATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
Phase 1 - $6,305 per application
Phase 2 - $5,520 per application
Phase 3 - $4,580 per application
Phase 1 - $3,050 per application
Phase 2 - $2,703 per application
Phase 3 - $2,247 per application
S-151 CANNABIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$13,165 per application$7,000 per application
S-152 CANNABIS LIVESCAN PROCESSINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$75 per scan$168 per scan
June 21, 2024
31 48
EXHIBIT B
55 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-153 CANNABIS ZONING VERIFICATION LETTERREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$415 per letter$192 per letter
S-154 CANNABIS BACKGROUND REVIEWREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
New - $300
Renewal - $100
New - $300
Renewal - $100
S-155 CANNABIS APPEAL PROCESSINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3,940 per appeal$1,960 per appeal
S-156 CANNABIS PRE-LICENSE SITE VISITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,575 per visit$1,849 per visit
S-157 CANNABIS REGULATORY COMPLIANCE INSPREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,840 per annual inspection$1,606 per annual inspection S-158 CANNABIS REINSPECTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,440 per reinspection$956 per reinspection
June 21, 2024
32 49
EXHIBIT B
56 CITY OF MARINA
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-159 CANNABIS TAX AUDITREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10,670 per audit$6,351 per audit
S-160 ANNUAL RENTAL PROPERTY MONITORINGREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,085 per propertyNone
S-161 BELOW MARKET RATE CERTIFICATIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$310 per application plus actual cost of outside consultantNone S-162 BELOW MARKET NEW CONSTRUCTION SALESREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,995 per reviewNone
S-163 BELOW MARKET REFINANCE TRANSACTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,530 per transactionNone
S-164 BELOW MARKET RESALE TRANSACTIONREF #: TITLE:
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,995 per transactionNone
June 21, 2024
33 50
EXHIBIT B
57 APPENDIX C
DETAIL OF
BUILDING & SAFETY FEES
437
EXHIBIT C
58 CITY OF MARINA SCHEDULE C-1
BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
CURRENT PROPOSED
SERVICE FEE FEE
Building Permit Issuance $43 $60
BUILDING PERMITS
Building Permit Under $500 Valuation $31 $36
Building Permit $501-$2,000 Valuation $31 + $3.87 for each $100 over $500 $36 + $4.40 for each $100 over $500 Building Permit $2,001-$25,000 Valuation $89 + $17.74 for each $1,000 over $2,000 $102 + $20.43 for each $1,000 over $2,000 Building Permit $25,001-$50,000 Valuation $497 + $12.92 for each $1,000 over $25,000 $572 + $14.84 for each $1,000 over $25,000 Building Permit $50,001-$100,000 Valuation $820 + $8.88 for each $1,000 over $50,000 $943 + $10.22 for each $1,000 over $50,000 Building Permit $100,001-$500,000 Valuation $1,264 + $6.92 for each $1,000 over $100,000 $1,454 + $7.96 for each $1,000 over $100,000 Building Permit $500,001-$1,000,000 Valuation $4,033 + $5.93 for each $1,000 over $500,000 $4,638 + $6.82 for each $1,000 over $500,000 Building Permit Over $1,000,000 Valuation $7,000 + $4.19 for each $1,000 over $1,000,000 $8,048 + $4.82 for each $1,000 over $1,0 00,000
BUILDING PLAN CHECK
Building Plan Check Under $500 Valuation $20 $23
Building Plan Check $501-$2,000 Valuation $20 + $2.53 for each $100 over $500 $23 + $2.93 for each $100 over $500 Building Plan Check $2,001-$25,000 Valuation $58 + $11.52 for each $1,000 over $2,000 $67 + $13.22 for each $1,000 over $2,000 Building Plan Check $25,001-$50,000 Valuation $323 + $8.40 for each $1,000 over $25,000 $371 + $9.68 for each $1,000 over $25,000 Building Plan Check $50,001-$100,000 Valuation $533 + $5.78 for each $1,000 over $50,000 $613 + $6.64 for each $1,000 over $50,000 Building Plan Check $100,001-$500,000 Valuation $822 + $4.50 for each $1,000 over $100,000 $945 + $5.17 for each $1,000 over $100,000 Building Plan Check $500,001-$1,000,000 Valuation $2,621 + $3.86 for each $1,000 over $500,000 $3,013 + $4.44 for each $1,000 over $500,000 Building Plan Check Over $1,000,000 Valuation $4,549 + $1.13 for each $1,000 over $1,000,000 $5,233 + $1.30 for each $1,000 over $1,000,000 MISCELLANEOUS:
Window Changeout - SFR $198 $228
Exterior Siding - SFR $198 $228
Re-Roof:
SFR $198 $228
Non-SFR $242 $276
Miscellaneous Building Permit $277 $315
Demolition Permit $161 $190
Duplicate Inspection Card $43 $61
Duplicate Certificate of Occupancy $43 $61
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy $43 $61
Other Inspections not specified $133 $144
Overtime Inspection (4 hour minimum) OT Hourly Rate OT Hourly Rate Additional Plan Review Hourly Rate Hourly Rate
Expedited Plan Review in addition to regular Plan Review Fee OT Hourly Rate OT Hourly Rate Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate
EXHIBIT C
59 CITY OF MARINA SCHEDULE C-2
BUILDING & SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
2024
CURRENT PROPOSED
Permit Issuance $43 $60
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
Electrical Sign $213 $251
Power Apparatus $207 $247
Temporary Power Pole $194 $233
Services, Switchboards, Control Centers, & Panels
SFR $260 $345
Non-SFR $260 $315
Pole or Platform Mounted Fixtures (Every 5 Lights) $342 $393 Recept, Switch, Lighting Outlet, and Lighting Fixture, per fixture First 10 items $254 $291
Each item over 10 $4 $5
Combo Permit: EV Charging Station $277 $315
Combo Permit: Swimming Pool
SFR $593 $672
Non-SFR $827 $926
Combo Permit: In-Ground Spa
SFR $421 $479
Non-SFR $540 $609
Combo Permit: Solar System
SFR $277 $315
Non-SFR $421 $479
Meter Reset $198 $228
Miscellaneous Electrical Permit $132 $158
PLUMBING PERMITS
Backflow Protection Device $109 $133
Expansion Tank $109 $133
Miscellaneous Plumbing Permit $132 $158
MECHANICAL PERMITS
Commercial Air Handling Unit (Per Unit) $403 $467
Independent Venting System $403 $467
Type I & II Hood served by Mechanical Exhaust $403 $467 Miscellaneous Mechanical Permit $132 $158
Inspections not specified $132 $144
Reinspections $132 $144
After Hours Inspection (4 hour minimum) Hourly Rate Hourly Rate Plan Check - 100% of Permit Fee
Overtime Hourly Rate is 120% of the Regular Hourly Rate
EXHIBIT C
60 APPENDIX E
DETAIL OF
RECREATION
FACILITY & FIELD FEES
443
EXHIBIT D
61 Recreation Facility Rental Fees Appendix E