Agenda — Marina City Council, July 1, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

AGENDA
Tuesday, July 1, 2025 5:00 P.M. Closed Session
6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR

AGENCY OF THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND MARINA THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).

Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
AND
Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556

PARTICIPATION
You may participate in the City Council meeting in person or in real-time by calling Zoom Meeting via the weblink and phone number provided at the top of this agenda. Instructions on how to access, view and participate in remote meetings are provided by visiting the City’s home page at https://cityofmarina.org/. Attendees can make oral comments during the meeting by using the “Raise Your Hand” feature in the webinar or by pressing *9 on your telephone keypad if joining by phone only.

The most effective method of communication with the City Council is by sending an email to [email protected] Comments will be reviewed and distributed before the meeting if received by 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. All comments received will become part of the record.

Council will have the option to modify their action on items based on comments received.

AGENDA MATERIALS
Agenda materials, staff reports and background information related to regular agenda items are available on the City of Marina’s website www.cityofmarina.org. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available on the City of Marina website www.cityofmarina.org subject to City staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.

VISION STATEMENT
Marina will grow and mature from a small town bedroom community to a small city which is diversified, vibrant and through positive relationships with regional agencies, self -sufficient. The City will develop in a way that insulates it from the negative impacts of urban sprawl to become a desirable residential and business community in a natural setting. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

AMENDED AGENDA PACKET
Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 Page 2

MISSION STATEMENT
The City Council will provide the leadership in protecting Marina’s natural setting while developing the City in a way that provides a balance of housing, jobs and business opportunities that will result in a community characterized by a desirable quality of life, including recreation and cultural opportunities, a safe environment and an economic viability that supports a high level of municipal services and infrastructure. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The City recognizes that it was founded and is built upon the traditional homelands and villages first inhabited by the Indigenous Peoples of this region - the Esselen and their ancestors and allies - and honors these members of the community, both past and present.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM: (City Council, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonprofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Members and Marina Groundwater Sustainability Agency)

Jenny McAdams, Brian McCarthy, Kathy Biala, Mayor Pro-Tem/Vice Chair Liesbeth Visscher, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None

4. CLOSED SESSION:
a. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation (§ 54956.9(d)) (2 case(s)) i. Sierra Club., Inc. v. City of Marina, et al., Civil No. 82333, Monterey County Superior Court
ii. City of Marina, et. al. v. California Coastal Commission, et al., 22-CV- 004063, Monterey County Superior Court
b. Real Property Negotiation (Govt. Code Section 54956.8) i. Property: Locke-Paddon Park, various parcels, APN Nos.: 033-121-004, 033-121-005-006, 033-132-003, 033-132-003, 033-121-101, 033-121- 009, 033-121-002
Negotiating Party: Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
c. Labor Negotiations
i. UWUA-MEA
ii. Marina Professional Fire Fighters Association
iii. Marina Public Safety Managers Association
iv. Marina Middle Manager Association
v. Marina Police Officers Association
vi. Directors
a. Assistant City Manager
b. Community Development Director
c. Finance Director
d. Fire Chief v. Police Chief
e. Public Works Director
f. Recreation & Cultural Services Director
City Negotiators: Layne P. Long and Employee Relations Officer

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 Page 3 6:30 PM - RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN

CLOSED SESSION

5. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. Marina Falcons Chess Club Proclamation
b. Dean Xu Jing Atherton
c. National Parks and Recreation Month Proclamation
d. FORTAG California Ave Project Update – TAMC
e. Dunes/8th Street roundabout Presentation
f. Central Coast Community Energy (3CE) 2025 Annual Update

7. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS:

8. PUBLIC COMMENT: Any member of the public may comment on any matter within the City Council’s jurisdiction that is not on the agenda. This is the appropriate place to comment on items on the Consent Agenda. Action will not be taken on items not on the agenda. Comments are limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. General public comment may be limited to thirty (30) minutes and/or continued to the end of the agenda. Any member of the public may comment on any matter listed on this agenda at the time the matter is being considered by the City Council. Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.

9. CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Background information has been provided to the Successor Agency of the former Redevelopment Agency on all matters listed under the Consent Agenda, and these items are considered to be routine and non-controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda are normally approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of the public or City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, the Council may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. If an item is pulled for discussion, it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency.

10. CONSENT AGENDA:

These items are considered to be routine and non-controversial.

All items under the Consent Agenda may be approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, Council may remove the item from the Consent Agenda and it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items.
a. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Accounts Payable Check Numbers 107178-107208, totaling $430,697.85 b. MINUTES: None
c. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: None
d. AWARD OF BID: None
Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 Page 4

e. CALL FOR BIDS: None
f. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -, confirming levy of the special tax for the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2015 -1 (The Dunes) for Fiscal Year 2025 -26 as authorized by Ordinance No. 2015 - 03, and; adopting Resolution No. 2025 -, certifying City of Marina compliance with State law (Proposition 218) with respect to a special tax for the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2015 -1 as authorized by Ordinance No. 2015-03 for Fiscal Year 2025-26. (2) Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -, a pproving the creation of utility easement on City property (Gloria Jean Tate Park, 3254 Abdy Way) ; and authorizing all other actions necessary to accept and record said easements on behalf of the City of Marina.
(3) Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -, approving Waiver of Potential Conflict and Consent to Concurrent Representation – Sierra Club, Inc. (4) Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -, confirming levy of the special tax for the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2024 -1 (The Dunes) for Fiscal Year 2025 -26 as authorized by Ordinance No. 2024 - 11, and; Resolution No. 2025 -, certifying City of Marina compliance with State law (Proposition 218) with respect to a special tax for the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 20 24-1 as authorized by Ordinance No. 2024-11 for Fiscal Year 2025-26
g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2025-, approving a Reimbursement Agreement with Marina Coast Water District to cover the costs for the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) for the City’s GP2045 EIR. (2) Adopting Resolution N o. 2025-, approving an Amendment to the Lease Agreement between the City of Marina (City) and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC for construction and operation of a
telecommunications facility on City -owned property at the northwest corner of California and 3rd avenue.
(3) Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -, amending the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding cooperative assistance to comply with Senate Bill 1383, Food Waste Reduction and Organics Recycling Regulations, incorporating changes in the annual cost of program activities.
(4) Adopting Resolution No, 20250, approval of Architectural Services agreement with Wald Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP for the design of the Fire Station #2 Expansion Project.
h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: None
i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE): None
k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS: None
Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 Page 5

l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING): None
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS: None

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS: In the Council’s discretion, the applicant/proponent of an item may be given up to ten (10) minutes to speak. All other persons may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak on the matter.
a. City Council to consider opening public hearing, taking any testimony from public, and consider adopting Resolution No. 2025-__, forming the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Overlay Assessment District and levying the assessment for FY 2025-26 in connection with the overlay district and the existing Cypress Cove I I Landscape Maintenance Assessment District, and certifying City of Marina compliance with State Law (Proposition 218) with respect to the assessment for the existing Cypress Cove I I Landscape Maintenance Assessment District for fiscal year 2025 -2026; or, in the alternative, adopting a resolution declaring its intention to dissolve the existing Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance District. b. Open the public hearing and take any testimony from the public, and; Consider introducing Ordinance No. 2025-, amending chapter 3.26 of the Marina Municipal Code regarding mitigation fees for new development within the City of Marina.
c. Open public hearing and consider adopting Resolution No. 2025 -, approving 2025 Schedule of Fees and Service Charges. This item continued to August 6, 2025.
d. Open public hearing and introducing Ordinance No. 2025-, amending the Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Title 17 adding Section 17.04.305 (Garden Structures), Section 17.42.060 (Fences), and Chapter 17.55 (Staff Approvals and Procedures) and amending Sections 17.42.020 (Use Regulations),

17.42.055 (Height), and 17.42.070 (Yards) with corresponding updates to residential districts (17.06, 17.08, 17.10, and 17.12); and finding this action is exempt from environmental review per Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
e. Open public hearing and introducing Ordinance No. 2025-, amending the Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Title 8, to add C hapter 8 .80 relating to shopping cart regulations as directed; and find this action is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061( b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

12. OTHER ACTIONS ITEMS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY : Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The Successor Agency may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

13. OTHER ACTION ITEMS: Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The City Council may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

Note: No additional major projects or programs should be undertaken without review of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006).

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 Page 6

a. Read by Title Only and adopting Ordinance No. 2025 -11, amending Section

10.60.010 “Speed Limits Established” of Chapter 10.60 “Speed Limits” of Title 10 “Vehicles and Traffic” to adopt prima facie speed limits pursuant to an engineering and traffic survey and the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

Continued from June 24, 2025
b. City Council to receive a status update and provide additional directions to staff on activities relating to Locke-Paddon Park (LPP). This presentation is exempt from Environmental review per Sec. 15378 of the CEQA guidelines. c. Consider adding “Call Up” measures to Section 17.70 (Appeals) of the Marina Municipal Code (MMC), the proposed ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 1506l (b)(3) of the CEQA guidelines.

14. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council reports on meetings and conferences attended ( Gov’t Code Section 53232).

15. ADJOURNMENT:

CERTIFICATION

I, Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Marina, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall and Council Chambers Bulletin Board at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Monterey County Library Marina Branch at 190 Seaside Circle, City Bulletin Board at the corner of Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard on or before 6:30 p.m., Friday, June 27, 2025.

___________________________________

ANITA SHARP, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
City Council, Airport Commission and Redevelopment Agency meetings are recorded on tape and available for public review and listening at the Office of the City Clerk and kept for a period of 90 days after the formal approval of MINUTES.

City Council meetings may be viewed live on the meeting night and at 12:30 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. on Cable Channel 25 on the Sunday following the Regular City Council meeting date. In addition, Council meetings can be viewed at 6:30 p.m. every Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. For more information about viewing the Council Meetings on Channel 25, you may contact Access Monterey Peninsula directly at 831-333-1267.

Agenda items and staff reports are public record and are available for public review on the City's website (www.ciytofmarina.org), at the Monterey County Marina Library Branch at 190 Seaside Circle and at the Office of the City Clerk at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina between the hours of 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m., on the Monday preceding the meeting.

Supplemental materials received after the close of the final agenda and through noon on the day of the scheduled meeting will be available for public review at the City Clerk’s Office during regular office hours and in a ‘Supplemental Binder’ at the meeting.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 Page 7

ALL MEETINGS ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. THE CITY OF MARINA DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible. Meetings are broadcast on cable channel 25 and recordings of meetings can be provided upon request. To request assistive listening devices, sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please call (831) 884 -1278 or e -mail:
[email protected]. Requests must be made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.

U p c o m i n g 202 5 M e e t i n g s o f t h e C i t y C o u n c i l , A i r p o r t C o m m i s s i o n , M a r i n a A b r a m s B N o n - P r o f i t C o r p o r a t i o n , P r e s t o n P a r k S u s t a i n a b l e C o m m u n i t y N o n p r o f i t C o r p o r a t i o n , S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y o f t h e F o r m e r R e d e v e l o p m e n t A g e n c y a n d M a r i n a G r o u n d w a t e r S u s t a i n a b i l i t y A g e n c y R e g u l a r M e e t i n g s : 5 : 0 0 p . m . C l o s e d S e s s i o n ; 6 : 3 0 p . m . R e g u l a r O p e n S e s s i o n s

Tuesday, July 1, 2025
Tuesday, July 15, 2025 (Cancelled)

Tuesday, October 7, 2025
Tuesday, October 21, 2025

**Wednesday, August 6, 2025
Tuesday, August 19, 2025 (Cancelled)

Tuesday, November 4, 2025
Tuesday, November 18, 2025

*Wednesday, September 3, 2025
Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Tuesday, December 2, 2025
Tuesday, December 16, 2025

* Regular Meeting rescheduled due to Monday Holiday
** Regular Meeting rescheduled due to National Night Out *** Regular Meeting rescheduled due to General Election Day

C I T Y H A L L 202 5 H O L I D A Y S
(City Hall Closed)

Independence Day (City Offices Closed) ---------------------------------- Friday, July 4, 2025 Labor Day ------------------------------------------------------------ Monday, September 1, 2025 Veterans Day (City Offices Closed) ----------------------------- Tuesday, November 11, 2025 Thanksgiving Day ------------------------------------------------- Thursday, November 27, 2025 Thanksgiving Break -------------------------------------------------- Friday, November 28, 2025 Winter Break ------------ Wednesday, December 24, 2025-Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 Page 8

2025 COMMISSION DATES

U p c o m i n g 2025 M e e t i n g s o f P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n 2nd and 4th Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

June 26, 2025 August 14, 2025
August 28, 2025
October 9, 2025
October 23,2 025
July 10, 2025 September 11, 2025 November 13, 2025
July 24, 2025 September 25, 2025 November 27, 2025 (Cancelled) December 11, 2025

U p c o m i n g 2025 M e e t i n g s o f P u b l i c W o r k s C o m m i s s i o n 1st Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

July 3, 2025 September 4, 2025 November 6, 2025
August 7, 2025 October 2, 2025 December 4, 2025

U p c o m i n g 2025 M e e t i n g s o f R e c r e a t i o n & C u l t u r a l S e r v i c e s C o m m i s s i o n
1st Wednesday of every second month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

July 2, 2025 September 10, 2025 November 5, 2025

U p c o m i n g 2 0 2 5 M e e t i n g s o f M a r i n a T r e e C o m m i t t e e 2nd Wednesday of every quarter month as needed. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

July 9, 2025 October 8, 2025

Agenda Item: 6a
Agenda Item: 6b
Agenda Item: 6c
FORTAG
California Ave Segment
Overview & Updates
July 1, 2025
Agenda Item: 6d
Project Partners

Pathway for Today’s Meeting
FORTAG: Overall program overview
Segments Currently in Design in Marina
Project Timeline
Community Outreach
Sensitive Species
Trail Design
Wayfinding
Supplemental Agreement
Questions & Answers

FORTAG
28-mile
Regional
Trail Network
Design
Underway
Construction
Underway

Two segments currently in design

Construction Begins in 2026
Estimated completion
June 2027

10+ Years of Community Outreach
Founders conceive of
regional trail & first
stakeholder meetings
2013
Voters approve
Measure X
2016
TAMC begins
environmental review
2017
Final EIR and Master
Agreement approved;
Design & outreach for
Canyon Del Rey
2020
Grant funds secured
for next two segments
and design begins
2023
TAMC completes
design and begins
construction of Canyon
Del Rey Segment
2024
Design, construction,
and outreach efforts
continue on all
segments
2025

100+ Community Members Attended Recent Meetings
• Jan 2025
• May 2025
• Jun 2025
TAMC Bike & Pedestrian
Committee
Community Meeting #1
Crumpton Elementary
Community Meeting #2
Marina Equestrian Center
Incidental Take Permit for Rare Plants
Monterey Gilia Monterey
Spineflower
Coastal
Biscuitroot
Kellogg's Horkelia Monterey
Ceanothus
Sandmat
Manzanita

Design of California Ave Segment is Nearly Complete
Examples of trail appearance
California Avenue Marina Equestrian Center
Open Space

Wayfinding Provided for Multiple Types of Users
Post Marker
Seat
Marker
Sign 1 Sign 2
Pedestrian
Kiosk

Future Council Reviews & Approvals to Come
Fall 2025
Groundbreaking of FORTAG Canyon del Rey Segment (May 2024) • Trail Adoption
Fall 2027
• Environmental Mitigation Area
• Habitat Mitigation Plan
• Supplemental Agreement

Thank you!!
Project Website:
https://www.tamcmonterey.org
> Programs and Projects
> Fort Ord Regional Trail & Greenway
> FORTAG-California Avenue

Questions & Answers

Agenda Item: 6e

3CE Annual Update
City of Marina
July 1st, 2025
Agenda Item: 6f
T ogether,
Power for Good

2024 E nergy Highlights
Sourced 409 Megawatts
of clean & renewable energy in 2024, enough to power
350,850 households with renewable energy.

Sourcing R enewable E nergy
avoided more than 445,000 metric tons of CO2,the
equivalent of taking 105,911 gasoline-powered passenger vehicles off the road for a year.

Renew able E nergy Progress
Megawatts
(Oct.)
• Balances intermittent renewables
• Supports stability
• Reduces reliance on fossil fuels
• Drives affordability
• Empowers customers
Battery E nergy Storage Systems
Support the Renewable Transition

Supply T rend September 2022
• L abor D ay W eekend
2022
• F lex A lert
• T ext message from
G overnor's O ffice
Supply T rend July 2024
• Independence D ay
holiday weekend
2024
U tility Scale B attery Safety

Willow Rock Energy Storage Center
● Storage is essential for CA 's transition to carbon-free energy ● U tilizes compressed air to generate power on demand
● L argest compressed air energy storage project in the world ● 200 m egaw atts for 3C E custom ers
O ur E nergy Future
New Renewable Energy Project
O ur E nergy Future
New Renewable Energy Project
Atlas Solar
● 1 50 m egaw atts for 3C E custom ers
● E nough to power 105,100 homes

Aratina Solar + Storage
● 1 20 m egaw atts for 3C E custom ers
● E nough to power 90,000 homes
O ur E nergy Future
New Renewable Energy Project

Victory Pass Solar + Storage
● 1 00 m egaw atts for 3C E custom ers
● E nough to power 68,000 homes
O nline N ow
New Renewable Energy Project
Community E ngagement
• Ongoing outreach through events, webinars, an
workshops
• Added bilingual staff and expanded translated
materials
• Adopted Underserved Communities Action Plan
• Increased access with interpreters and bilingua
promotion
Community Programs
$1,000-4,000
$150,000
E lectrify Y our
Ride
E lectrify
Y our Home
$17,385
$2,500 per unit
N ew Construction
E lectrification
Program
$5,000 ADU
$250,000
A gricultural
E lectrification
Program
$75,000
Residential
Battery Rebate
Program
$13,000
M ember A gency Programs
Fleet &
Charging
Infrastructure Plans
Plan Y our
F leet
E lectric Bus
Program
$400,000
C harge Y our
F leet
Up to
$150,000
El e c t r i f y
Y our F leet
Up to
$150,000
Reach Codes
Program
Assistance for
development and
adoption
M aking a D ifference
Community Investment
Snapshot of R ebates & Incentives:
● 2,843 electric vehicles
● 2,085 E V chargers
● 1,663 projects for E V readiness
● 38 electric buses
● 746 all-electric water heaters & H V A C systems
● 1,458 all-electric affordable housing units
● 93 all-electric agriculture equipment projects
Community Investment
Rebates & Incentives
Marina 3CE Investment:
• $42,223 – Plan Your Fleet
• $1,000 – Ag Electrification
• $6,800 – Electrify Your Home
• $333,636 – Electrify Your Ride
• $170,000 – New Construction Electrification
Seaside 3CE Investment:
• $61 ,000 – E lectrify Y our Home
• $217,612 – E lectrify Y our Ride
• $240,000 - N ew Construction E lectrification
• $2,500 – R esidential Battery Storage Program
T hank Y ou!
Contact Us:
• Northern Region: Sophia Schwirzke ([email protected]) • Southern Region: Spencer Brandt ([email protected])
• Senior Advisor for Policy and Legislative Affairs: D as W illiams ([email protected])
L earn more & apply for programs at 3Cenergy.org
Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.010 - Prof Svc Admin - Muni Code
10149 - Code Publishing Inc. - General
Code
GCI0017881 MMC WebUpdate Paid by Check
# 107185
06/20/2025 06/16/2025 06/16/2025 06/27/2025 147.00
Account 6300.010 - Prof Svc Admin - Muni Code Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $147.00 Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10027 - Alliant Insurance Services - CSRMA 3129266 Fourth of July Event Insurance
Paid by EFT #
6317
06/19/2025 06/16/2025 06/16/2025 06/27/2025 760.00
11618 - Tripepi, Smith & Associates, Inc. 14793 PR Support - May 2025 Paid by Check # 107202
05/31/2025 06/16/2025 06/16/2025 06/27/2025 378.75
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,138.75 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6115654557 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by EFT #
6324
06/10/2025 06/24/2025 06/24/2025 06/27/2025 213.87
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $213.87 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $1,499.62 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $1,499.62 Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $1,499.62 Department 130 - Finance
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit
11476 - Chavan & Associates LLP C&A-18751 FY24-25 professional audit services:

City/Abrams/Preson/MX
/FORA
Paid by Check
# 107183
06/25/2025 06/25/2025 06/25/2025 06/27/2025 15,000.00
Account 6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $15,000.00 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6115654557 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by EFT #
6324
06/10/2025 06/24/2025 06/24/2025 06/27/2025 102.86
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $102.86 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $15,102.86 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $15,102.86 Department 130 - Finance Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $15,102.86 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
12047 - Roesling Nakamura Terada
Architects
13978 Marina Facilities
Concept Plan - May
2025
Paid by Check
# 107200
06/18/2025 06/23/2025 06/23/2025 06/27/2025 10,498.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM Page 1 of 14 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/27/25 - 06/27/25
Agenda Item: 10a
Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
12208 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE
2269
2022 Dodge Durango
825 PD
Paid by Check
# 107199
06/16/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025
555.00
12208 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE
2270
2022 Dodge Durango
924 PD
Paid by Check
# 107199
06/18/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025
249.00
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $11,302.00
Account
6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023633705
CALNET3-9391023482
(884-0985)
Paid by Check
# 107179
06/15/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025

31.58 10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023633707
CALNET3-9391023485
(884-2573)
Paid by Check
# 107179
06/15/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025

32.83 10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023633712
CALNET3-9391023490
(884-9568)
Paid by Check
# 107179
06/15/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025

60.05 10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023633713
CALNET3-9391023491
(884-9654)
Paid by Check
# 107179
06/15/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025

92.58 Account
6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $217.04
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
June 2025 683-
2 PG&E 6217294683-2
Paid by Check
# 107198
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
219.62
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $219.62
Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
June 2025 56-
018
208 Palm Ave
Paid by Check
# 107194
06/12/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025
255.30
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
June 2025 56-
017
208 Palm Ave Unit A
Paid by Check
# 107194
06/12/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025

71.59 Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $326.89
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
10 $12,065.55
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
10 $12,065.55
Department
190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
10 $12,065.55
Department
210 - Police
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking
12070 - Open Road Investors, LLC
1059
Monthly Parking Lot
Rent
Paid by Check
# 107197
06/21/2025
06/23/2025
06/23/2025
06/27/2025
1,600.00
Account
6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,600.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,600.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,600.00
Department
210 - Police
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,600.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 2 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
250 - Fire
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10129 - Cintas Corporation
4234465774
Towel - Microfiber
Towel
Paid by Check
# 107184
06/20/2025
06/20/2025
06/20/2025
06/27/2025
159.99
10623 - Xerox Financial Services
40618037
FD Monthly Copier
Charges 06/03/25-
07/02/25
Paid by Check
# 107204
06/13/2025
06/23/2025
06/23/2025
06/27/2025
257.13
Account
6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $417.12
Account
6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
10967 - Monterey Signs, Inc.
26758
Installation and
Removal of Vinyl
Numbers for Trucks
5401 5402
Paid by EFT #
6322
06/23/2025
06/23/2025
06/23/2025
06/27/2025
1,409.29
Account
6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,409.29
Account
6400.796 - Material & Suppl Turnout Equip-Wildland Fires 10124 - Charles Murray / JAECO Fire &
Safety
20122
Boots for Mike Smith
Paid by Check
# 107182
05/29/2025
06/23/2025
06/23/2025
06/27/2025
1,272.73
Account
6400.796 - Material & Suppl Turnout Equip-Wildland Fires Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,272.73
Account
6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking
12070 - Open Road Investors, LLC
1059
Monthly Parking Lot
Rent
Paid by Check
# 107197
06/21/2025
06/23/2025
06/23/2025
06/27/2025
400.00
Account
6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $400.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
5 $3,499.14
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
5 $3,499.14
Department
250 - Fire
Totals
Invoice Transactions
5 $3,499.14
Department
310 - Public Works
Division
311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
091622
Streets for Light duty
Staff
Paid by Check
# 107178
06/11/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025

25.12 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
091643
Facilities Rental Apt
Paid by Check
# 107178
06/13/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025

49.14 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
091648
City Hall Handrail and
Deck
Paid by Check
# 107178
06/16/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025

27.30 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
091639
Community Center
Playground
Paid by Check
# 107178
06/13/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025

5.51 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
091638
306 Reservation
Paid by Check
# 107178
06/13/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025

16.38 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
091614
Water Heater Cap
Paid by Check
# 107178
06/10/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025

7.63 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 3 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
310 - Public Works
Division
311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
091612
VD BBQ
Paid by Check
# 107178
06/10/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025

29.49 10239 - First Alarm
893888
2660 5th Ave
Paid by EFT #
6320
06/15/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025
390.48
Account
6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
Totals
Invoice Transactions
8 $551.05
Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
June 2025 56-
019
211 Hillcrest Ave
Paid by Check
# 107194
06/12/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025
709.46
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
June 2025 56-
001
209-13 Cypress Ave
Paid by Check
# 107194
06/12/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025
197.90
Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $907.36
Account
6400.737 - Material & Suppl Tools & Equip
11968 - Safetequip, Inc.
110193
PPE
Paid by Check
# 107201
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025
731.54
Account
6400.737 - Material & Suppl Tools & Equip
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $731.54
Account
6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
12058 - Melissa Orduno - Employee
02-03-25
Boot reimbursement
Paid by Check
# 107195
02/03/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025
141.97
Account
6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $141.97
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
12 $2,331.92
Division
311 - Buildings & Grounds
Totals
Invoice Transactions
12 $2,331.92
Division
313 - Vehicle Maint
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
11230 - Golden State Truck & Trailer
Repair, Inc.

W50472
Unit 19-01 Rosenbaum
FD
Paid by Check
# 107190
06/09/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025
12,628.12
12208 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE
2269
2022 Dodge Durango
825 PD
Paid by Check
# 107199
06/16/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025
1,147.98
12208 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE
2270
2022 Dodge Durango
924 PD
Paid by Check
# 107199
06/18/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025
532.43
Account
6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $14,308.53
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $14,308.53
Division
313 - Vehicle Maint
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $14,308.53
Department
310 - Public Works
Totals
Invoice Transactions
15 $16,640.45
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 4 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
410 - Planning
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning
10171 - CSG Consultants
61532
Marina Station
Paid by EFT #
6319
06/10/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025
13,547.00
Account
6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $13,547.00
Account
6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless
6115654557
Monthly Verizon Bill-
308174766
Paid by EFT #
6324
06/10/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
102.91
Account
6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $102.91
Account
6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10734 - Office Depot-Public Works Dept.
420168396001
Heater
Paid by Check
# 107196
06/02/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025

84.33 Account
6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $84.33
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $13,734.24
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $13,734.24
Department
410 - Planning
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $13,734.24
Department
420 - Engineering
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6330.200 - Fee Agr Costs - Engineering
10189 - Denise Duffy & Associates
9592

HILLTOP PARK DD&A
Project #2024-56
Paid by Check
# 107186
01/10/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
1,872.00
Account
6330.200 - Fee Agr Costs - Engineering
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,872.00
Account
6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
10734 - Office Depot-Public Works Dept.
424515842001
Corp Yard
Paid by Check
# 107196
06/02/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025
280.98
10734 - Office Depot-Public Works Dept.
426505238001
Annex office supplies
Paid by Check
# 107196
06/05/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025

36.57 10734 - Office Depot-Public Works Dept.
426711269001
Corp Yard Cabinet
Paid by Check
# 107196
06/05/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025
1,255.28
Account
6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $1,572.83
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $3,444.83
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $3,444.83
Department
420 - Engineering
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $3,444.83
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 5 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
430 - Building Inspection
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.100 - Prof Svc Code Enforcement
10171 - CSG Consultants
61563
Marina Code
Enforcement Services
Paid by EFT #
6319
06/13/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
3,240.00
Account
6300.100 - Prof Svc Code Enforcement
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,240.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,240.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,240.00
Department
430 - Building Inspection
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,240.00
Department
510 - Recreation & Culture
Division
100 - Admin
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6400.652 - Material & Suppl Recr Special Progr / Events 12116 - GENE FISCHER/MOBILE CLIMB

USA, LLC
07-04-25 B
4th of July Event
Paid by Check
# 107189
06/18/2025
06/18/2025
06/18/2025
06/27/2025
1,500.00
Account
6400.652 - Material & Suppl Recr Special Progr / Events Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,500.00
Account
6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
12249 - California Association of Public
Information Offic
24398
Optimizing AI for Public
Communicators
Paid by Check
# 107181
05/29/2025
06/18/2025
06/18/2025
06/27/2025

25.00 Account
6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $25.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $1,525.00
Division
100 - Admin
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $1,525.00
Division
514 - Sports
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6400.656 - Material & Suppl Recr Sports Prog
11869 - Agile Occupational Medicine PC
EM046216-A
physical exam fees
Paid by EFT #
6316
06/03/2025
06/18/2025
06/18/2025
06/27/2025
125.00
10269 - Hasty Awards
06250485
medals
Paid by Check
# 107191
06/16/2025
06/18/2025
06/18/2025
06/27/2025
921.37
Account
6400.656 - Material & Suppl Recr Sports Prog
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $1,046.37
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $1,046.37
Division
514 - Sports
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $1,046.37
Department
510 - Recreation & Culture
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $2,571.37
Fund
100 - General Fund
Totals
Invoice Transactions
49 $73,398.06
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 6 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
220 - Gas Tax
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
June 2025 329-
1 430 Marina Heights Dr
Unit A (2391581329-1)
Paid by Check
# 107198
06/12/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025

47.75 10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
June 2025 080-
9 5th Ave Bldg 1A-136
(3479881080-9)
Paid by Check
# 107198
06/06/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025

24.64 10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
June 2025 683-
2 PG&E 6217294683-2
Paid by Check
# 107198
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
1,031.22
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $1,103.61
Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
June 2025 56-
016
Resev Rd & Seacrest
Ave-Next to Fire Hyd
Paid by Check
# 107194
06/12/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025

65.06 10349 - Marina Coast Water District
June 2025 56-
087
Crescent Ave/Costa Del
Mar Irrigation
Paid by Check
# 107194
06/04/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025

42.29 Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $107.35
Account
6400.737 - Material & Suppl Tools & Equip
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
091591
Streets
Paid by Check
# 107178
06/06/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025

31.57 Account
6400.737 - Material & Suppl Tools & Equip
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $31.57
Account
6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
12248 - Blue Triton Brands Inc
05F8720337299
209 Cypress Ave
Paid by Check
# 107180
06/17/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025

89.54 12248 - Blue Triton Brands Inc
05F8720346923
2660 5th Ave
Paid by Check
# 107180
06/06/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025
274.00
10949 - Edges Electrical Group
S6428047.003
Streetlight Fixture
Paid by Check
# 107187
06/11/2025
06/17/2025
06/17/2025
06/27/2025
3,267.49
Account
6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $3,631.03
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $4,873.56
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $4,873.56
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $4,873.56
Fund
220 - Gas Tax
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $4,873.56
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 7 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
222 - Measure X Trans Sfty/Investment
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit
11476 - Chavan & Associates LLP
C&A-18751
FY24-25 professional
audit services:

City/Abrams/Preson/MX
/FORA
Paid by Check
# 107183
06/25/2025
06/25/2025
06/25/2025
06/27/2025
2,000.00
Account
6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,000.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,000.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,000.00
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,000.00
Fund
222 - Measure X Trans Sfty/Investment
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,000.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 8 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
223 - FORA Dissolution
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit
11476 - Chavan & Associates LLP
C&A-18751
FY24-25 professional
audit services:

City/Abrams/Preson/MX
/FORA
Paid by Check
# 107183
06/25/2025
06/25/2025
06/25/2025
06/27/2025
1,250.00
Account
6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,250.00
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc.
65342
Blight Removal
Paid by Check
# 107203
06/23/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
10,541.15
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10,541.15
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $11,791.15
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $11,791.15
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $11,791.15
Fund
223 - FORA Dissolution
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $11,791.15
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 9 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
251 - CFD - Locke Paddon
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
June 2025 272-
1 PG&E - 2862559272-1
Paid by Check
# 107198
06/17/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025

49.13 Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $49.13
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $49.13
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $49.13
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $49.13
Fund
251 - CFD - Locke Paddon
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $49.13
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 10 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
462 - City Capital Projects
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11364 - COAR Design Group
22857
Aquatic & Sports
Center
Paid by EFT #
6318
05/31/2025
06/18/2025
06/18/2025
06/27/2025
226,285.00
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc.
31635220
Del Monte Blvd &
Beach Rd
Paid by Check
# 107192
03/21/2025
06/23/2025
06/23/2025
06/27/2025
18,361.26
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc.
31835579
Del Monte Blvd &
Beach Rd
Paid by Check
# 107192
04/30/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
17,977.40
12217 - LEATHERS & ASSOCIATES INC
12354
schematic design phase
Paid by Check
# 107193
06/23/2025
06/23/2025
06/23/2025
06/27/2025
13,300.00
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
129671881
EV Charging Stations At
Glorya Jean Tate Park
Paid by Check
# 107207
04/02/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
34,054.06
12266 - Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc.
53585
Windy Hill Park
Improvements
Paid by Check
# 107205
06/16/2025
06/18/2025
06/18/2025
06/27/2025
12,985.00
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc.
32077670
Marina Speed Surveys
Paid by Check
# 107192
05/31/2025
06/16/2025
06/16/2025
06/27/2025
4,460.24
10515 - Rincon Consultants, Inc.
66242
Marina Housing
Element Update
Paid by EFT #
6323
06/11/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
6,038.94
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
Totals
Invoice Transactions
8 $333,461.90
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
8 $333,461.90
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
8 $333,461.90
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
8 $333,461.90
Fund
462 - City Capital Projects
Totals
Invoice Transactions
8 $333,461.90
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 11 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
555 - Marina Airport
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building
10967 - Monterey Signs, Inc.
26742
Installation of Pilots
Lounge sign
Paid by EFT #
6322
06/19/2025
07/10/2025
06/18/2025
06/27/2025
295.00
Account
6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $295.00
Account
6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless
6115654557
Monthly Verizon Bill-
308174766
Paid by EFT #
6324
06/10/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
102.91
Account
6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $102.91
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
June 2025 683-
2 PG&E 6217294683-2
Paid by Check
# 107198
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/24/2025
06/27/2025
476.14
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $476.14
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $874.05
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $874.05
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $874.05
Fund
555 - Marina Airport
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $874.05
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 12 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
556 - Preston Park NonProfit Corp
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit
11476 - Chavan & Associates LLP
C&A-18751
FY24-25 professional
audit services:

City/Abrams/Preson/MX
/FORA
Paid by Check
# 107183
06/25/2025
06/25/2025
06/25/2025
06/27/2025
2,125.00
Account
6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,125.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,125.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,125.00
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,125.00
Fund
556 - Preston Park NonProfit Corp
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,125.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 13 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
557 - Abrams B NonProfit Corp
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit
11476 - Chavan & Associates LLP
C&A-18751
FY24-25 professional
audit services:

City/Abrams/Preson/MX
/FORA
Paid by Check
# 107183
06/25/2025
06/25/2025
06/25/2025
06/27/2025
2,125.00
Account
6300.215 - Prof Svc Fin - Audit
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,125.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,125.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,125.00
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,125.00
Fund
557 - Abrams B NonProfit Corp
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,125.00
Grand Totals
Invoice Transactions
75 $430,697.85
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/26/2025 02:52:07 PM

Page 14 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
06/27/25
-
06/27/25

June 26, 2025 Item No. 10f(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 1, 2025

CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-,

CONFIRMING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX F OR THE CITY OF
MARINA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2015-1 (THE
DUNES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 20 25-26 AS AUTHORIZED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -03; AND RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-,

CERTIFYING CITY OF MARINA COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW
(PROPOSITION 218) WITH RESPECT TO A SPECIAL TAX FOR THE CITY OF MARINA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2015-1 AS AUTHORIZED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2015-03 FOR FISCAL YEAR
2025-26

RECOMMENDATION:

It is requested that the City Council:

1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 20 25-, confirming levy of the special tax for the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (The Dunes) for Fiscal Year 2025-26 as authorized by Ordinance No. 2015-03, and;

2. Resolution No. 20 25-, certifying City of Marina compliance with State law (Proposition 218) with respect to a special tax for the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 as authorized by Ordinance No. 2015-03 for Fiscal Year 2025-26

BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to a special election held on June 2, 2015 , on June 16, 2015 , the City Council unanimously passed Ordinance No. 2015-03, forming the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 20 15-1 (commonly referred to as The Dunes CFD). Ordinance 2015-03 also authorized an annual special tax levy for the purpose of administration and services of District maintenance of streets, sidewalks, curb & gutters, street lighting and storm drains . The special tax was first levied for fiscal year 2015-16, in the amount of $ 437.22 for each of the assessed residential units and $5,187 per acre of undeveloped property. The assessment was calculated for the ongoing phased future maintenance of the District improvements. Each subsequent year, Ordinance 2015-03 requires the special tax to be increased by the lesser of 4% or the Construction Cost Index as published in the Engineering News Record (ENR) from the previous approved Maximum Special Tax . For Fiscal Year 25/26, the Construction Cost Index did not increase. The Rates and Apportionment for this District therefore applies a maximum annual rate increase of 0.00%.

On June 21, 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution 2016 -96, accepting annexation of property into the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2015 -1(The Dunes). The annexation area incorporates the Dunes Residential Subdivision Phase 1C Final Map 2.

On April 4, 2017, the City Council adopted Resolution 2017 -35, accepting annexation of property into the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2015 -1(The Dunes). The annexation area incorporates the Dunes Residential Subdivision Phase 1C Final Map 3.

1 On February 15, 2022 , the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-21, accepting annexation of property into the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2015 -1(The Dunes). The annexation area incorporates the Dunes Subdivision Phase 2 East/Residential.

Accordingly, the special tax for each fiscal year since inception has been as follows (NOTE:

Monterey County requires that rates be divisible by 2 for placement on the rolls, so calculations are rounded each year):

Fiscal
Year Tax Per Parcel Tax Per Acre
Total Special Tax
(to be) Collected
End of FYAudit
Balance
FY 15/16 $437.22 $5,187.00 $54,228.30
FY 16/17 $452.66 $5,369.89 $101,268.60
FY 17/18 $459.46 $5,450.69 $162,605.34
FY 18/19 $470.92 $5,586.73 $160,509.62
FY 19/20 $484.24 $5,744.70 $160,767.68
FY 20/21 $501.52 $5,974.48 $166,504.64
FY 21/22 $520.50 $6,174.70 $172,806.00 $948,045.00
FY 22/23 $541.32 $6,421.69 $303,025.22
FY 23/24 $541.70 $6,426.16 $297,944.08
FY 24/25 $541.70 $6,426.31 $298,476.70
FY 25/26 $541.70 $6,426.31 $298,476.70

ANALYSIS:

Each year's special tax is collected by the Monterey County Tax Collector, and then disbursed to the City. When received by the City, special taxes are credited in the accounting system to Fund 252 - CFD Dunes No. 2015-1. Likewise, expenditures and costs incurred on behalf of the District are posted to Fund 252 expenditure accounts.

As of June 30, 20 23, the fund balance in Fund 252 (cumulative tax re venue in excess of expenditures since inception) is projected to be approximately $1,042,285. Due to the age of the District improvements, scheduled maintenance service expenditures are expected in FY 2 5/26 into 2 6/27. Anticipated maintenance costs are approximately $ 505,402, including a schedule d slurry seal of various streets along with video inspections of the underground stormwater system as shown on EXHIBIT C. Improvements are scheduled per the maintenance plan attached as EXHIBIT D to cover ongoing maintenance of streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and storm drains. The maintenance funding needs formed the basis for establishing the district and setting the initial assessment.

Ordinance 2015-03 authorizes the finance director “...to determine the specific special tax to be levied for the next ensuing fiscal year for each parcel of real property within the CFD (including any parcel or parcels in the future annexation area that annex into the CFD), in the manner and as provided in the resolution of formation.”

However, Monterey County will not impose or collect the special tax on the District's behalf unless the City submits, in a form provided by the County, a certification of compliance with State Law (Proposition 218) that includes a hold harmless and indemnification provision for administrative expenses of the County associated with collection of the City's taxes, assessments, fees or charges, other than the Constitutionally authorized 1% ad valorem tax.

2 Attached is a resolution which, if adopted by the Council will satisfy the County's certification, hold-harmless and indemnification requirements with respect to the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 Special Tax for the 2025-26 fiscal year.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Special assessments finance the CFD's approved maintenance services. Total to be credited to the district is as follows:

Fund 252 Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 $298,476.70

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________________
Edrie Delos Santos, P.E.

Engineering Division
Public Works Department

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

________________________________
Tori Hannah
Finance Director
City of Marina

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

________________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina
3 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MARINA CONFIRMING

LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX FOR THE CITY OF MARINA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2015-1 AS AUTHORIZED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2015-03 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

WHEREAS, Ordinance 2015-03 authorized the levy of a special tax for the benefit of The City of Marina Community Facilities District 2015-1 starting in Fiscal Year 2015-16 and increasing by the lesser of 4% or the Construction Cost Index as published in the Engineering News Record (ENR) from the previous approved Maximum Special Tax. For Fiscal Year 25/26, the Construction Cost Index increased by 0.00%. The Rates and Apportionment for this District therefore applies an annual rate increase of 0.00%, and;

WHEREAS the Administrator has calculated the maximum Fiscal Year 2025/26 special tax to be $541.70 per parcel and $6,426.31 per Acre of undeveloped property, and;

WHEREAS, the CFD administrator having further considered the special tax requirements in accordance with Exhibit A to Ordinance 2015-03, by which Community Facilities District 2015-1 was established and continues, has determined that a special tax for fiscal year 2025-26 be assessed at $541.70 per parcel and $6,426.31 per Acre of undeveloped property.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina that:

1. The City does hereby confirm the diagram and assessment as described in the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk.

2. The City does hereby order the levy and collection of said assessment $541.70 per parcel and $ 6,426.31 per Acre of undeveloped property for FY 2025/26 assessment for The Dunes CFD No. 2015-1.

3. It is the intention of the City of Marina that any monetary advance mad e by it during any fiscal year to cover a deficit in the improvement fund of Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 shall be repaid from the next annual assessments levied and collected within Community Facilities District No. 2015-1

4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of said diagram and assessment with the Monterey County Auditor prior to August 1, 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MARINA CERTIFYING
COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW (PROPOSITION 218) WITH RESPECT TO

LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES ON BEHALF OF CITY OF MARINA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2015-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

WHEREAS, the City of Marina “Public Agency” requests that the Monterey County Auditor - Controller enter those general or special taxes, assessments, or property -related Fees or charges identified in Exhibit “A” on the tax roll for collection and distribution by the Monterey County Treasurer-Tax Collector commencing with the property tax bills for fiscal year 2025-26

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:

1. The Public Agency hereby certifies that it has, without limitation, complied with all legal procedures and requirements necessary for the levying and imposition of the general or special taxes, assessments, or property -related fees or charges identified in Exhibit “A”, regardless of whether those procedures and requirements are set forth in the Constitution of the State of California, in State statues, or in the applicable law of the State of California.

2. The Public Agency further certifies that, except for the sole negligence or misconduct of the County of Monterey, its officers, employees, and agents, with regards to the handling of the Cd or electronic file identified as Exhibit “A”, the Public Agency shall be solely liable and responsible for defending, at its sole expense, cost, and risk, each and every action, suit, or other proceeding brought against the County of Monterey, its officers, employees, and agents for every claim, demand, or challenge to the levying or imposition of the general or special taxes, assessments, or property –related fees or charges identified in Exhibit “A” and that it shall pay or satisfy any judgment rendered against the County of Monterey, its officers, employees, and agents on every such action, suit, or other proceeding, including all claims for refunds and interest thereon, legal fees and court costs, and administrative expenses of the County of Monterey to correct the tax rolls.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Marina City Council at a regular meeting duly held on the 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

5 EXHIBIT A

ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 2025-____ OF THE CITY OF MARINA, COUNTY

OF MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW WITH

RESPECT TO THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAX

FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

SPECIAL TAXES:

City of Marina CFD No. 2015-1 (The Dunes)
• Developed Property
o Residential Rate (Per-Unit Rate) $541.70
o Non-Residential Rate (Per-Acre Rate) $6,426.31
• Undeveloped Property (Per-Acre Rate) $6,426.31

Special Tax Levy Summary
Developed Property
Residential
Non-Residential

551 Units

0.00 Acres

$298,476.70
$0.00
Undeveloped Property 0.00 Acres $0.00
Total $298,476.70

6 EXHIBIT B

TO STAFF REPORT
Estimates Estimates Estimates
Summary FY 2024-2025 FY 2025-2026 FY 2026-2027*
Beginning Cash Balance, July 1st 1,042,847$ 1,065,921$ 858,995$ (a)Total Special Tax Revenue 298,477$ 298,477$ 298,477$ (b) Expenditures
Maintenance Services
Facilities Maintenance 21,930$ 21,930$ 21,930$ Maintenance Cycle Deposit 135,755$ 135,755$ 135,755$ Construction Cost (Slurry Seal) 110,000$ 340,000$ 100,000$ Administrative Services
Financial Administration 4,948$ 4,948$ 4,948$ Cost Allocation Charges 2,770$ 2,770$ 2,770$ (c) Total Services Costs 275,403$ 505,403$ 265,403$ Ending Fund Balance, June 30 th 1,065,921$ 858,995$ 892,069$ * Revenue and Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2026-27 are only estimates and subject to change. (c) Total Services Costs include Facilities Maintenance and Administration expenditures. Deposits are held for schedule maintenance projects. (b) Expenditures for FY 23/24 are estimated with City acceptance of CFD improvements, including a slurry seal for various streets. (a) Maximum Assessment per Rate of Apportionment is $541.70 per parcel & $6,426.31 per undeveloped acre for FY 25/26 (ENR Construction Cost Index increase of 0.00%).

The Dunes Community Facilities District (CFD 2015-1)
Fiscal Year Budget Scenario
7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

CITY OF MARINA
211 HILLCREST AVENUE
MARINA, CALIFORNIA 93933
PH: (831) 8841212
FAX: (831) 3840425
SCALE: NONE
Exhibit C
07/12/23
The Dunes 2015-01
Community Facilities
District
Maintenance Exhibit
Project Area

VICINITY MAP
LEGEND:

FY 23/24
- Resurfacing/Stormwater Inspection
FY 24/25
- Resurfacing/Stormwater Inspection
-24/25
-25/26
8 Exhibit D
Dunes Community Facilities District 2015-01
Maintenance Summary
Pavement Maintenance Cycle
Description Cycle Period
Slurry Seal Year 7, Year 14
Overlay Year 21
Street Sweeping Semi-Monthly
Sidewalk/Curb & Gutter Maintenance Cycle
Description Cycle Period
Replacement 35 Year Life
Inspection/Repair Annually
Streetlights Maintenance Cycle
Description Cycle Period
Replacement 25 Year Life
Inspection/Repairs Annually
Storm Drain/Infiltration System Maintenance Cycle
Description Cycle Period
Replacement 50 Year Life
Vacuum/Deep Clean Every 5 years
Inspection/Repairs Annually
9 June 23, 2025 Item No. 10f(2)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 1, 2025

RECOMMENDATION TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-,

APPROVING THE CREATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT S ON CITY
PROPERTY ( GLORIA JEAN TATE PARK , 3254 A BDY WAY), AND;

AUTHORIZING ALL OTHER ACTIONS NECESSARY TO ACCEPT AND
RECORD SAID EASEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MARINA, AND;

AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE THE NECESSARY
ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES, AND; AUTHORIZING THE CITY

CLERK TO RECORD A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE RESOLUTION IN THE

MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council Consider adopting Resolution No. 2025-,

1. Approving the creation of utility easement on City property (Gloria Jean Tate Park, 3254 Abdy Way), and;

2. Authorizing all other actions necessary to accept and record said easements on behalf of the City of Marina, and;

3. Authorizing the Finance Director to make the necessary accounting and budgetary entries, and;

4. Authorizing the City Clerk to record a certified copy of the resolution in the Monterey County office of the County Recorder.

BACKGROUND:

The Marina Coast Water District (MCWD) Tate Park Lift Station project is needed to serve the Central Marina customers, as well as the new Marina Station development. The existing lift station facilities are too small to manage the increased sewage flow from the Marina Station development.

The Tate Park site is proposed for the new lift station location because it is on the east side of Highway 1, which improves resiliency against climate change.

ANALYSIS:

In order to provide for the installation of the new sanitary sewer lift station and associated gravity and force-main sewer pipes in the northeast corner of Gloria Jean Tate Park, a utility easement is necessary through the Park property. A gravity sewer pipe feeding the lift station is proposed along the north edge of the park. A force main pipe conveying the discharge from the lift station is proposed to replace and up -size the existing force main facility south, across Reservation Road, and through the h otel site immediately east of Highway 1 right -of-way. The required easements have been attached as EXHIBIT A, B, AND C

1 City staff have requested MCWD to provide an appraisal for the t hree proposed easements. The valuation for the easements per the appraisal report along with the cost to review easement documents amounts to $ 65,600. Staff is recommending accepting the appraised value for the easements and approving the MCWD easements as proposed.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Should the Council approve this recommendation, City staff will coordinate with the Finance Department and City Attorney to finalize the payment of the appraised value and record the final easement documents with the County Recorder.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

__________________________
Edrie Delos Santos, P.E.

Engineering Division
Public Works Department

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

__________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MARINA APPROVING THE CREATION

OF UTILITY EASEMENTS ON CITY PROPERTY (GLORIA JEAN TATE PARK, 3254 ABDY WAY), AND; AUTHORIZING ALL OTHER ACTIONS

NECESSARY TO ACCEPT AND RECORD SAID EASEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MARINA, AND; AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE

DIRECTOR TO MAKE THE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND
BUDGETARY ENTRIES, AND; AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO

RECORD A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE RESOLUTION IN THE MONTEREY

COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER

WHEREAS, the Marina Coast Water District (MCWD) Tate Park Lift Station project is needed to serve the Central Marina customers, as well as the new Marina Station development. The existing lift station facilities are too small to manage the increased sewage flow from the Marina Station development. The Tate Park site is proposed for the new lift station location because it is on the east side of Highway 1, which improves resiliency against climate change, and;

WHEREAS, in order to provide for the installation of the new sanitary sewer lift station and associated gravity and force-main sewer pipes in the northeast corner of Gloria Jean Tate Park, a utility easement is necessary through the Park property. A gravity sewer pipe feeding the lift station is proposed along the north edge of the park. A force main pipe conveying the discharge from the lift station is proposed to replace and up -size the existing force main facility south, across Reservation Road, and thro ugh the hotel site immediately east of Highway 1 right -of-way. The required easements have been attached as Exhibit A, B, and C, and;

WHEREAS, City staff have requested MCWD to provide an appraisal for the three proposed easements. The valuation for the easements per the appraisal report along with the cost to review easement documents amounts to $65,600. Staff is recommending accepting the appra ised value for the easements and approving the MCWD easements as proposed, and;

WHEREAS, should the Council approve this recommendation, City staff will coordinate with the Finance Department and City Attorney to finalize the payment of the appraised value and record the final easement documents with the County Recorder.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina that:

1. Approve the creation of utility easement on City property (Gloria Jean Tate Park, 3254 Abdy Way), and;

2. Authorize all other actions necessary to accept and record said easements on behalf of the City of Marina, and;

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make the necessary accounting and budgetary entries, and;

4. Authorize the City Clerk to record certified copy of resolution in the Monterey County office of the County Recorder.

3 Resolution No. 2025-
Page Two

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 EXHIBIT A
SHEET 1 OF 3

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF A

SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
Certain real property situate in the City of Marina, County of Monterey, State of California, described as follows:

Being a portion of that certain real property shown as Lot 33 on that certain map filed in Volume 2 of Maps and Grants at Page 15 of the Official Records of said County, more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at a point on the northwesterly boundary of Drew Street, a City Street, as said street is shown on that certain map filed in Volume 14 of Cities and Towns maps at Page 60 of the Official Records of said County, said point also being on the southwesterly sideline of a 20-foot- wide pipeline easement described in the deed recorded September 24, 1970 in Reel 667 at

Page 814 ends

feet from the most southerly corner of Parcel B, as said Parcel is shown on that certain map filed in Volume 12 of Parcel Maps at Page 99 of the Official Records of said County; thence from said POINT OF BEGINNING and along said northwesterly boundary of Drew Street 1) South 34°32'00" West, 22.14 feet; thence departing said boundary of Drew Street 2) North 55°28'00" West, 147.22 feet; thence
3) South 51°29'57" West, 34.14 feet to a point on the easterly sideline of a 20-foot-wide sanitary sewer easement described in the deed recorded June 28, 1984 in Reel 1746 at

Page 108 ends

4) North 04°10'12" East, 40.80 feet; thence departing said sanitary sewer easement sideline 5) North 51°29'57" East, 20.48 feet to a point on the southwesterly sideline of said 20-foot- wide pipeline easement; thence along said pipeline easement sideline and parallel with the southwesterly boundary of said Parcel B
6) South 55°28'00" East, 171.83 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 4,352 square feet, more or less.

Attached hereto is a plat to accompany legal description, and by this reference made a part hereof.

The bearing of South 55°28'00" East along the southwesterly boundary of Parcel B as shown on that certain map filed in Volume 12 of Parcel Maps at Page 99 of the Official Records of said County, is the basis of bearings cited in this description.

END OF DESCRIPTION
5 EXHIBIT A
SHEET 2 OF 3
PREPARED BY:

WHITSON ENGINEERS
_______________________________________05/28/2025
RICHARD P. WEBER P.L.S. DATE
L.S. NO. 8002
Job No.: 4105
6 PROJECT No.:

T:\Monterey Projects\4105 - Marina Station\SURVEY\LEGAL DESC\Tate Park\Lift Station Esmt-Legal Plat.dwg Civil Engineering +
Land Surveying
6 Harris Court
Monterey, CA 93940
831.649.5225
whitsonengineers.com
4105

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
LOT 33 (VOL. 2, MAPS & GRANTS, PG. 15)

GLORYA JEAN TATE PARK
CITY OF MARINA, MONTEREY COUNTY, CA. MAY 2025

SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
EI N E
S
ONW
E
N
I TH S
G R

EXHIBIT A
SHEET 3 OF 3
7 EXHIBIT B
SHEET 1 OF 2

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF A

SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION EASEMENT
Certain real property situate in the City of Marina, County of Monterey, State of California, described as follows:

Being a portion of that certain real property shown as Parcel A, as shown on that certain map filed in Volume 14 of Cities and Towns maps at Page 60 of the Official Records of said County, more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at a point on the northwesterly boundary of said Parcel A, said point bears South 55°28'00" East, along the prolongation of the southwesterly boundary of Parcel B, as said Parcel B is shown on that certain map filed in Volume 12 of Parcel Maps at Page 99 of the Official Records of said County, and distant 50.00 feet from the most southerly corner of said Parcel B; thence from said POINT OF BEGINNING and along said northwesterly boundary of Parcel A
1) North 34°32'00" East, 29.65 feet; thence departing said boundary of Parcel A 2) South 55°28'00" East, 13.33 feet; thence
3) South 34°32'00" West, 29.65 feet; thence
4) North 55°28'00" West, 13.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 395 square feet, more or less.

Attached hereto is a plat to accompany legal description, and by this reference made a part hereof.

END OF DESCRIPTION
PREPARED BY:

WHITSON ENGINEERS
_______________________________________05/28/2025
RICHARD P. WEBER P.L.S. DATE
L.S. NO. 8002
Job No.: 4105
8 PROJECT No.:

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
VOL. 14, CITIES & TOWNS, PG. 60

PARCEL A
CITY OF MARINA, MONTEREY COUNTY, CA. MAY 2025

SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION EASEMENT
EI N E
S
ONW
E
N
I TH S
G R

EXHIBIT B
SHEET 2 OF 2
9 EXHIBIT C
SHEET 1 OF 2

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF A

PG&E UTILITY EASEMENT
Certain real property situate in the City of Marina, County of Monterey, State of California, described as follows:

Commencing at the most southerly corner of Parcel B, as said Parcel B is shown on that certain map filed in Volume 12 of Parcel Maps at Page 99 of the Official Records of said County; thence from said POINT OF COMMENCEMENT and along the prolongation of the southwesterly boundary of said Parcel B
a) South 55°28'00" East, 50.00 feet to a point on said northwesterly boundary of said Parcel A; thence along said boundary of Parcel A
b) North 34°32'00" East, 29.65 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said boundary of Parcel A
1) North 34°32'00" East, 11.25 feet; thence departing said boundary of Parcel A 2) South 55°28'00" East, 10.31 feet; thence
3) South 34°32'00" West, 11.25 feet; thence
4) North 55°28'00" West, 10.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 116 square feet, more or less.

Attached hereto is a plat to accompany legal description, and by this reference made a part hereof.

END OF DESCRIPTION
PREPARED BY:

WHITSON ENGINEERS
_______________________________________05/28/2025
RICHARD P. WEBER P.L.S. DATE
L.S. NO. 8002
Job No.: 4105
10 PROJECT No.:

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION
MONTEREY CITY LANDS (PROJECTED SECTION 24, T 14 S, R 1 E, MDM) PARCEL A, VOL. 14, CITIES & TOWNS, PG. 60
CITY OF MARINA, MONTEREY COUNTY, CA. MAY 2025

PG&E UTILITY EASEMENT
EI N E
S
ONW
E
N
I TH S
G R

EXHIBIT C
SHEET 2 OF 2
11 396 HAYES STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
T: (415) 552 -7272 F: (415) 552 -5816
www.smwlaw.com
RENE A. ORTEGA
Attorney
[email protected]
June 27, 2025
Mayor and City Council
City of Marina
211 Hillcrest Avenue
City of Marina, CA 93933
Re: Waiver of Potential Conflict and Consent to Concurrent Representation – Sierra Club, Inc.

Dear Mayor and City Council:

The firm of Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP (the “Firm”) currently serves as City Attorney and represents the City of Marina (“City”) in connection with a wide variety of legal matters.

In 1986, the City and the Sierra Club (“Club”) entered into a settlement agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") to resolve and settle disputes in a civil action entitled Sierra Club., Inc., Petitioner and Plaintiff, v. City of Marina, Respondent and Defendant; Roger Post, The Post Companies; Does One through Twenty. Real Parties in Interest and Defendants (together "Real Parties"), filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Monterey, Civil No. 82333.

Briefly, the Settlement Agreement requires a full EIR (unless categorically exempt) for any project in the City’s coastal zone. Locke-Paddon Park, a park owned jointly by the City and Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District is located within the City’s local coastal zone (the “Park”). As such, any potential development which constitutes a project would require a full environmental impact report (“EIR”) unless exempt. The City and the Club have amended the Settlement Agreement several times in the past to allow certain projects to proceed without an EIR. Recently, there has been communication between Rita Dalessio, Chair of the Ventana Chapter of the Club, and the City concerning potential amendment of the Settlement Agreement again to address CEQA without having to do a full EIR for certain City activities in the Park should they not be categorically exempt.

Agenda Item: 10f(3)
City Council Meeting of
July 1, 2025
1 City of Marina
June 27, 2025

Page 2 ends

As City Attorney, the Firm advises the City on land use matters in the City’s local coastal zone and has been asked to advise on amending the Settlement Agreement to address certain activities which have been undertaken in the Park (a Martin Luther King, Jr. sculpture garden and an Oak woodland community garden and associated walking paths) as well as certain planned activities, including a children’s sensory garden and a hybrid coastal passive garden that would include native and non- native coastal plants, walking paths over streams, a recycled water feature, and interpretive panels (“City Attorney Work”).

The Firm currently has an attorney-client relationship with the Club in multiple environmental matters in California related to opposing local government approvals of various warehouse projects and advice regarding related settlements; opposing Cottonwood Sand Mine project in San Diego County; advising regarding enforcement of existing settlement agreements related to development in Kern County; and opposing a specific plan for the development of Mare Island in the City of Vallejo (the Club Matters). We do not believe that there is any conflict of interest between our present work on the Club Matters and our work as City Attorney including advising the City on amending the Settlement Agreement as described above. Moreover, we do not believe that we have received any confidential communication from the Club that would be relevant to the City Attorney Work.

Our City Attorney Work is unrelated to the Club Matters and is unlikely to result in the Firm obtaining any confidential information from the City relevant to our representation of the Club. However, because the Firm represents the Club in the Club Matters, and the City is a party to the Settlement Agreement, the Firm would be in a position of representing two clients whose interests are adverse. Notwithstanding the absence of any risk to confidential information, this situation does give rise to the possibility of divided loyalty on the part of our Firm.

Although we are not aware of any actual or reasonably foreseeable adverse effects of such potential divided loyalty in this case, it is possible that such effects may arise. Because it is possible that an actual or potential conflict of interest could develop in the future from our work on the Club Matters, our City Attorney Work, and the City’s interest in the Settlement Agreement, we have decided to seek informed written consent from the City and the Club prior to undertaking advising the City in connection with amending the Settlement Agreement.

Of course, you have the option of retaining separate counsel in connection with amending the Settlement Agreement. I encourage you to seek independent counsel regarding the import of this consent, if you so desire, and would emphasize that you 2 City of Marina
June 27, 2025

Page 3 ends

remain completely free to seek independent counsel at any time even if you decide to sign the consent set forth below.

By signing this letter the City consents to the Firm’s representation in connection with amending the Settlement Agreement. The City further agrees not to assert any conflict of interest or to seek to disqualify us from representing the Club notwithstanding any adversity between the Club and the City regarding the Settlement Agreement.

By signing and returning this letter, you will consent to and waive any conflicts arising from this Firm’s concurrent representation of the Club in the Club Matters and to this Firm’s representation as City Attorney. You further agree not to assert any conflict of interest or otherwise seek to disqualify this Firm from representing the Club, notwithstanding any adversity between the Club and the City regarding the Settlement Agreement. We are also requesting that the Club similarly consent to such concurrent representation.

Please sign the enclosed original and return it to me. If you have any questions about this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP

Rene A. Ortega

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

CITY OF MARINA

Layne Long, City Manager

1933120.1
3 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

APPROVING A WAIVER OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND CONSENT TO

CONCURRENT REPRESENTATION OF THE CITY OF MARINA AND THE SIERRA CLUB, INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE

THE WAIVER AND CONSENT
WHEREAS, the City and the Sierra Club (“Club”) entered into a settlement agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") to resolve and settle disputes in a civil action entitled Sierra Club., Inc., Petitioner and Plaintiff, v. City of Marina, Respondent and Defendant; Roger Post, The Post Companies; Does One through Twenty. Real Parties in Interest and Defendants (together "Real Parties") , filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Monterey, Civil No. 82333; and WHEREAS, the firm of Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP (the “Firm”) currently serves as City Attorney, wherein such work may involve advising on and potentially amending the Settlement Agreement (“City Attorney Work”); and
WHEREAS, the Firm currently represents the Sierra Club in multiple environmental matters in California related to opposing local government approvals of various warehouse projects and advice regarding related settlements; opposing Cottonwood Sand Mine project in San Diego County; advising regarding enforcement of existing settlement agreements related to development in Kern County; and opposing a specific plan for the development of Mare Island in the City of Vallejo (the “Club Matters”); and WHEREAS, as City Attorney, the Firm has been asked to advise the City in connection with the Settlement Agreement, including advising on any amendment to the Settlement Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Firm has reached out to the Club to seek informed consent to the Firm’s representation as City Attorney, including waiver of the Firm’s involvement in the City Attorney Work; and WHEREAS, the City desires to have the Firm continue to serve as City Attorney; and WHEREAS, the City desires to provide informed consent to concurrent representation and waive any potential conflict of interest or conflict of interest that may exist.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Approve a waiver of conflict of interest and consent to concurrent representation of the City of Marina and the Sierra Club; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the waiver and consent to concurrent representation.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 1st day of July 2025 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 June 26, 2025 Item No. 10f(4)
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 1, 2025
CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-,

CONFIRMING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX F OR THE CITY OF
MARINA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-1 (THE
DUNES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 20 25-26 AS AUTHORIZED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 20 24-11; AND RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-,

CERTIFYING CITY OF MARINA COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW
(PROPOSITION 218) WITH RESPECT TO A SPECIAL TAX FOR THE CITY OF MARINA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-1 AS AUTHORIZED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2024-11 FOR FISCAL YEAR
2025-26
RECOMMENDATION:

It is requested that the City Council:

1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 20 25-, confirming levy of the special tax for the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2024-1 (The Dunes) for Fiscal Year 2025-26 as authorized by Ordinance No. 2024-11, and;

2. Resolution No. 20 25-, certifying City of Marina compliance with State law (Proposition 218) with respect to a special tax for the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2024-1 as authorized by Ordinance No. 2024-11 for Fiscal Year 2025-26
BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to a special election held on November 6, 2024 , on November 19, 2024 , the City Council unanimously passed Ordinance No. 2024-11, forming the City of Marina Community Facilities District No. 2024-1 (commonly referred to as The Dunes CFD). Ordinance 2024-11 also authorized an annual special tax levy for the purpose of administration and services of District maintenance of streets, sidewalks, curb & gutters, street lighting and storm drains . The total special tax for the first levied fiscal year 2025-26 is detailed in EXHIBIT A.

Each subsequent fiscal year, Ordinance 2024-11 requires the special tax to be adjusted by the escalation factor defined as the lesser of the percentage increase, if any, in the Construction Cost Index for the San Francisco region in the twelve (12) -month period ending June 1 of the prior Fiscal Year, as published in the Engineering News Record or four percent (4.0%). If, in any Fiscal Year, it is determined that the Construction Cost Index decreased in the prior Fiscal Year, the Escalation Factor shall be zero and no decrease in the Maximum Special Taxes shall be calculated.

Except for the Constitutionally -limited 1% ad valorem tax, the Monterey County Auditor - Controller will not place taxes, assessments, fees or charges on the rolls unless the City Council certifies by resolution that the City is in compliance with Proposition 218, the 1996 ' Right to Vote on Taxes Act ' with respect to each such tax. A certification resolution must contain hold harmless and indemnification provisions for administrative expenses of the County associated with collection of the City's taxes, assessments, fees and charges placed on the rolls. The certification, along with copies of the resolution setting the tax and certain other documentation, must be submitted to the County no later than August 1 2025. 1 ANALYSIS:

For t he special lev ies for District’s operations which must be included in the certification adopted by the Council, see Exhibit A.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Special Taxes finance the Community Facilities District approved maintenance. Total to be credited to the district is as follows:

The Dunes 2024-1 Community Facilities District
• $ 1,034,009.74 through Special Tax Levy

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________________
Edrie Delos Santos, P.E.

Engineering Division
Public Works Department

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

________________________________
Tori Hannah
Finance Director
City of Marina

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

________________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina
2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MARINA CONFIRMING

LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX FOR THE CITY OF MARINA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-1 AS AUTHORIZED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2024-11 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

WHEREAS, Ordinance 2024-11 authorized the levy of a special tax for the benefit of The City of Marina Community Facilities District 2024-1 starting in Fiscal Year 2025-26 and increasing by the lesser of 4% or the Construction Cost Index as published in the Engineering News Record (ENR) from the previous approved Maximum Special Tax.

WHEREAS the Administrator has calculated the maximum Fiscal Year 2025/26 special tax to be as described in Exhibit A to this resolution, and;

WHEREAS, the CFD administrator having further considered the special tax requirements in accordance with Exhibit A to Ordinance 2024-11, by which Community Facilities District 2024-1 was established and continues, has determined that the special tax es for fiscal year 2025-26 be assessed per Exhibit A to this resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina that:

1. The City does hereby confirm the diagram and assessment as described in the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk.

2. The City does hereby order the levy and collection of said assessment per Exhibit A of this resolution for FY 2025/26 assessment for The Dunes CFD No. 2024-1.

3. It is the intention of the City of Marina that any monetary advance mad e by it during any fiscal year to cover a deficit in the improvement fund of Community Facilities District No. 2024-1 shall be repaid from the next annual assessments levied and collected within Community Facilities District No. 2024-1

4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of said diagram and assessment with the Monterey County Auditor prior to August 1, 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
3 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MARINA CERTIFYING
COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW (PROPOSITION 218) WITH RESPECT TO

LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES ON BEHALF OF CITY OF MARINA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Marina City Council at a regular meeting duly held on the 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 EXHIBIT A

ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 2025-____ OF THE CITY OF MARINA, COUNTY

OF MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW WITH

RESPECT TO THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAX

FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

SPECIAL TAXES:

City of Marina CFD No. 2024-1 (The Dunes West Side Services)

Special Tax Levy Summary
Tax Zone 1 (1)
Developed Property
$1,844.50
$2,075.06
$1,959.78
$2,305.62
22 Units
62 Units
18 Units
48 Units
$40,579.00
$128,653.72
$35,276.04
$110,669.76
Undeveloped Property
$1,844.50
$2,075.06
$1,959.78
$2,305.62
0 Units
0 Units
2 Units
0 Units
$0.00
$0.00
$3,919.56
$0.00
Tax Zone 2
Developed Property
Single Family Detached
Single Family Attached
Non-Residential

$2,305.62
$1,959.78
$18,974.36

0 Units
7 Units

0.00 Acres

$0.00
$13,718.46
$0.00
Undeveloped Property $18,974.36 33.93 Acres $643,735.78 Tax Zone 3
Developed Property
Single Family Detached
Single Family Attached
Non-Residential

$2,305.62
$2,075.06
$6,442.00

0 Units
0 Units

0.00 Acres

$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Undeveloped Property $1,500.00 38.30 Acres $57,457.42
Total $1,034,009.74

(1) Rates in Tax Zone 1 are assigned on a per parcel basis. Please refer to the fiscal year 2025 -26 tax roll which identifies the per parcel rates.

5 June 10, 2025 Item No. 10g(1)

Members of the Marina City Council Meeting
City Council of July 1, 2024

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 202 5-,

AUTHORIZING REIMBURSEMENT TO MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT (MCWD) FOR RINCON CONSULTING, INC. PREPARATION OF A WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT (WSA) FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE (GP2045) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR); AUTHORIZE THE FINANCE

DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY

ENTRIES AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF CITY WITH MCWD SUBJECT TO FINAL
REVIEW BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PER §15061(b)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES.

REQUEST: It is requested that the Marina City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution 2025 -, approving a Reimbursement Agreement with Marina Coast Water District to cover the costs for the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) for the City’s GP2045 EIR;

2. Authorize the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of City with MCWD subject to final review by the City Attorney.

SUMMARY:

At its meeting on October 18, 2022, the City Council authorized a contract with Raimi+Associates (R+A) to prepare a comprehensive General Plan update (GP2045). The GP2045 process is moving along in its preparation of draft policies, chapters , and other important components of the update.

One of the most critical aspects of this process is the creation of growth projections that determine the likely amount, timing, and location of future growth in Marina. The growth projections are one of the main focal points of the EIR as they will determine projected traffic and water impacts that may have a substantial effect on the environment.

Within the City of Marina, potable water is provided by the Marina Coast Water District. MCWD is required to prepare an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) 1 every five (5) years . The UWMP analyzes current and future water demands within the service area and compares demands to projections of water supply availability in order to facilitate the identification of areas or circumstances where demand reduction measures or supplemental supply sources are necessary to ensure sufficient supply is available to meet all demands. The District’s 2020 UWMP was completed in 2021 and its 2025 will be started this year with an expected completion date of July 1, 2026. The 2025 UWMP is anticipated to provide the updated land use data and water demand projections necessary to inform analysis of water supply availability for the GP2045 EIR ; however, the 2025 UWMP will not be available to inform the GP2045 EIR, as the timing of its preparation does not correspond with our completion timeline of early summer 2026.

1 https://www.mcwd.org/docs/2021_uwmp/DRAFT_MCWD_2020_UWMP_v20210520.pdf 1 For this reason, the City asked Rincon, which has specific background in local and State water policy, to consider preparing a WSA for the GP2045 EIR as a way to expedite the water analysis timeline.

The preparation of a WSA is not explicitly required for a general plan update per Senate Bil (SB) 610, which amended California Water Code to require a WSA for certain types of development projects that will use groundwater as a water supply source. However, the purpose of a WSA is to assess water supply availability for a given proposal, including through consideration of all existing and anticipated demands on a common water supply source , and the WSA for GP2045 will therefore contain the updated service area demand characteristics necessary to inform the GP2045 EIR. This will allow the consultants to analyze the availability of water within the region to accommodate Marina’s projected growth through the expected general plan buildout of 2045.

The preparation of WSAs is typically done by the water district or a consultant hired by and managed by the district. For this reason, the City would be entering into a reimbursement agreement with MCWD for the cost of the WSA to be prepared by Rincon, as MCWD’s consultant. The Proposal to Prepare a Water Supply Assessment for the City of Marina General Plan Update (Proposal) has been provided by Rincon and is included as EXHIBIT A to the Resolution referred herein. Also included as EXHIBIT B to the Resolution is the draft Reimbursement Agreement (Agreement) with MCWD.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Because a WSA is typically not required for a general plan update, this cost was not included in R+A’s original GP2045 budget. Rincon’s proposed budget for the preparation of the WSA is $24,399.00 which would be paid directly by MCWD as the lead review authority. MCWD requires a 10% administrative review bringing the total reimbursement amount to $26,838.90.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The approval of this Reimbursement Agreement is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, 15061(b)(3) because the proposed agreement is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

Alyson Hunter, AICP
Sr. Planner, Community Development Dept.

City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

___________________________
Guido F. Persicone, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Marina

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina
2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES

AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON

BEHALF OF CITY WITH MCWD SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT IS EXE MPT FROM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PER §15061(b)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES.

WHEREAS, an integral part of the preparation of the City’s General Plan Update (GP2045) and required Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is the analysis of the City of Marina’s current and future water supply to ensure that water will be available to meet the City’s projected growth;

WHEREAS, one way to conduct this analysis is through the Marina Coast Water District’s (MCWD) 5-year Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) update which will begin this year with an expected completion date in mid- to late 2026;

WHEREAS, the City desires to continue to move quickly with its GP2045 EIR and seeks to complete the water analysis that would otherwise be completed by MCWD through its UWMP update by utilizing Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) to prepare a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) consistent with Senate Bill (SB) 610. This analysis would provide the City with the water data needed to continue with the EIR in advance of the completion of MCWD’s UWMP;

WHEREAS, the cost of the WSA, as described in the scope of work and budget included herein by reference as Exhibit A will be borne directly by MCWD which has review authority over such documents. Costs incurred by MCWD (including 10% administrative fee) associated with the preparation of the WSA will be reimbursed by the City as described the Reimbursement Agreement included by reference herein as Exhibit B;

WHEREAS, with the adoption of this Resolution, the City of Marina agrees to reimburse MCWD in the amount of $26,838.90, for its review and approval of the WSA; and

WHEREAS, the approval of this Resolution authorizing a Reimbursement Agreement between MCWD and the City of Marina is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, 15061(b)(3) because the proposed agreement is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Marina hereby:

1. Approve a Reimbursement Agreement with Marina Coast Water District to cover the costs for the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) for the City’s GP2045 EIR;

2. Authorize the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries; and

3 Resolution No. 2025-
Page Two

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of City with MCWD subject to final review by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 BERKELEY
1900 Addison Street, Suite 200, Berkeley, CA 94704
510.666.1010

LOS ANGELES
448 South Hill Street, Suite 512, Los Angeles, CA 90013 213.599.7670
Memo
April 28, 2025
To: Alyson Hunter, City of Marina
From: Melissa Stark and Matt Raimi, Raimi + Associates
Subject: Water Supply Assessment and Detailed Growth Projections: Direction and Next Steps
Raimi + Associates has prepared summary direction and next steps resulting from the coordination call on April 1, 2025, between Raimi + Associates (R+A), Rincon Consultants (Rincon), City of Marina (City), and the Monterey County Water District (MCWD):

Detailed Growth Projections
MCWD directed the City of Marina to provide detailed growth projections by job and housing category, as defined in the MCWD Codes and Ordinances Appendix C for use in the MCWD 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Update. While R+A’s scope on the General Plan Update includes high level growth projections (Task 5.10); this scope does not include the projections to be broken down into specific job and housing types. To meet MCWD’s request, the R+A Team must prepare detailed growth projections that further estimate jobs and household categories, beyond what is necessary for the GPU EIR. Thus, R+A will utilize General Plan Budget Contingency Funds, as approved by the City.

Upon finalizing the detailed growth projections, the City will supply MCWD with this data to be used as an input for the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan. The MCWD will find appropriate water supply and sources, as needed, to meet the projected demand outlined in these General Plan Update growth projections. As discussed during the call on April 1, 2025, the MCWD does not provide input or feedback on GPU growth projections.

Water Supply Assessment
Prior to the start of the General Plan Update project, a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) was not deemed necessary and hence was not included in the consultant team’s scope and budget. For reference, the General Plan Update scope notes the following regarding a WSA:

An official Water Supply Assessment (WSA) is not necessary for the General Plan process.

However, if MCWD elects to prepare one, Rincon will incorporate the information into the EIR. (R+A General Plan Update Project Scope - page 30)
Based on discussions with City and MCWD staff, it was determined that MCWD’s 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) will not be available to inform the EIR for the General Plan Update, and a WSA will therefore be prepared to document existing water supply and demands in MCWD’s service area, with updated information compared to the 2020 UWMP. The WSA will be

EXHIBIT A
5 4/28/25 2 Detailed Growth Projections and WSA Next Steps Memo used to inform the CEQA analysis of water supply availability for the General Plan Update buildout in lieu of the 2025 UWMP. As required by MCWD, Rincon will contract directly with the MCWD to prepare a WSA for the General Plan Update. The City will then enter into a reimbursement agreement with the MCWD. Rincon’s proposed scope and budget for the WSA are attached to this memo, for the City and MCWD’s consideration. MCWD will work with Rincon to prepare a WSA for the Marina General Plan Update and Program EIR analysis and will provide the necessary documents to the City of Marina.

Attachment: Rincon’s proposed scope and budget for the WSA.

EXHIBIT A
6 Rincon Consultants, Inc.
80 Garden Court, Suite 240
Monterey, CA 93940
831-333-0310

April 17, 2025
Rincon Project No. 22-13326
Attn: Patrick Breen, Water Resources Manager
Marina Coast Water District
11 Reservation Road
Marina, California 93933
Via email: [email protected]
Subject: Proposal to Prepare a Water Supply Assessment for the City of Marina General Plan Update
Dear Mr. Breen:

Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) is pleased to provide this proposal to the Marina Coast Water District (MCWD, or District) to prepare a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) for the City of Marina General Plan Update (“proposed project”). The WSA will be prepared for compliance with California Water Code as amended by Senate Bill 610 , and will be used to inform the project’s environmental analysis for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . Rincon is currently working with Raimi & Associates and the City of Marina to prepare the General Plan Update and associated CEQA analysis; this scope of work to prepare a WSA for the proposed project is independent from that work, and will be overseen by the District.

Scope of Work
The City of Marina receives water from MCWD, which will review and adopt the WSA for the proposed project, upon approval. MCWD’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) is being updated for the 2025 cycle, with 2025 UWMPs due to the Department of Water Resources by July 1, 2026. The CEQA document for the proposed project is anticipated to be published before the updated 2025 UWMP is available; therefore, the WSA will rely on information from the 2020 UWMP for water supply availability projections, and will quant ify differences between water demands in the City of Marina under the existing General Plan versus under the proposed project, to characterize how water demands under the proposed project would differ from those presented in the 2020 UWMP.

The WSA will characterize water supply availability for the proposed project based upon projections in the 2020 UWMP for existing water supply sources and water agreements . The WSA will also characterize any additional water supply sources that may be developed or acquired by the City to support the General Plan Update , such as new water projects or revisions to existing agreements.

These may include negotiations with parties to the 1993 Fort Ord Annexation Agreement and subsequent amendments , to exchange or acquire water allocated through Fort Ord and make it available to development that would be facilitated by the proposed project (such parties include the cities of Seaside, Del Rey Oaks, and Monterey, in addition to Marina, along with the County of Monterey). This scope of work does not include support for negotiation with parties to the Fort Ord water agreement or other such negotiations to redistribute existing water supplies in the project area or to augment existing supply sources through the developm ent of supplemental supply ; however, such support can be provided on a time and materials basis, if requested.

EXHIBIT A
7 City of Marina – General Plan Update
Water Supply Assessment

Assumptions
• This scope of work includes one hour -long kickoff meeting and up to three hour -long progress meetings with MCWD.
• No changes to the Project Description involving growth projections or development intensity that affect water demands will be introduced after initiation of the WSA. • This scope of work does not include coordination or negotiation with parties to the Fort Ord Annexation Agreement or amendments thereto to revise water allocations. • The City will provide Rincon with the WSAs prepared for projects that were accounted for in MCWD’s 2020 UWMP and have not been implemented yet or would be revised under the proposed project; WSAs referenced in the 2020 UWMP include C ypress Knolls (2006), Dunes on Monterey Bay- University Village (2007), Sea Haven- Marina Heights (2003), Marina Station (2006), Marina Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan (2020), and Marina Airport Business Park/UC MBEST (2020). • Rincon will respond to one round of comments from the District on the Draft WSA. • Comments will be provided to Rincon in consolidated format, with internal conflicts resolved. • Rincon will provide the Revised Draft WSA in tracked changes format, with responses included for all comments received on the Draft WSA.
• The Final WSA will consist of the Revised Draft WSA with tracked changes accepted and comments removed; any additional comments on the Revised Draft WSA will be minimal. • All deliverables will be submitted electronically; no hard copies will be provided. This scope of work and cost estimate do not include providing ADA-accessible deliverables. • No hydrologic modeling, groundwater modeling, or field work is necessary.

Deliverables
• Draft WSA (for review and comment by the District)
• Revised Draft WSA (for review and approval by the District) • Final WSA (for attachment to the EIR)
Cost and Timeline
Rincon’s proposed cost to complete this scope of work is $24,399 as shown in the table below. All costs will be billed on a time and materials basis using Rincon’s 2025 standard fee schedule (attached).

Task Budget
Task 1: Kickoff & Progress Meetings $1,319
Task 2: Draft WSA $17,326
Task 3: Revised Draft WSA $3,942
Task 4: Final WSA $1,812
Total Cost $24,399
Rincon will submit the Draft WSA within approximately six weeks of authorization and receipt of final buildout projections for the project. The Revised Draft and Final WSA will be provided within two weeks of receipt of consolidated comments on the prior deliverable.

EXHIBIT A
8 City of Marina – General Plan Update
Water Supply Assessment

This proposal is valid for a period of 30 days and is fully negotiable to meet the needs of the District for this assignment. We appreciate the opportunity to assist with this project. Please let us know if you have any questions about this proposal.

Sincerely,
Rincon Consultants, Inc.

Aubrey Mescher
Water Resources Planner
Megan Jones, MPP
Principal

EXHIBIT A
9 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF MARINA

FOR THE PREPARATION OF A WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT (WSA)
ASSOCIATED WITH THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE (GP2045) ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT REPORT (EIR)
This Reimbursement Agreement (“Reimbursement Agreement”) is entered into this day of , 2025, (the “Effective Date”) by and between the Marina Coast Water District, a California county water district (“MCWD”) and the City of Marina ( the “City”), a California municipal corporation. MCWD and the City are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and/or collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A, The City has undertaken to complete its comprehensive General Plan Update (“GP2045”) and has entered into a Professional Service Agreement (“PSA”) with Raimi & Associates (R+A) to complete the project. In connection with completing GP2045, R+A has subcontracted with Rincon Consultants, Inc. (“Rincon”) to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) for the GP2045 as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).

B. In connection with GP2045 and for purposes of complying with CEQA, the City has requested that MCWD prepare a Water Supply Assessment (“WSA”) consistent with Senate Bill (SB) 610.

C. MCWD will enter into a separate PSA with Rincon such that Rincon will be MCWD’s consultant for purposes of completing the WSA.

D. Pursuant to MCWD Code 6.16.030, City will reimburse MCWD for its costs incurred in providing the WSA, as set forth below.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. MCWD’s Obligations.
(a) MCWD shall provide a WSA to the City for the GP2045 such that City may utilize the WSA for purposes of CEQA compliance. The WSA shall be conducted in accordance with Water Code §10910.
(b) MCWD shall enter into a separate PSA with Rincon, such that Rincon can conduct the WSA described herein. A copy of the PSA is attached hereto as Attachment No. 1 and incorporated herein.

EXHIBIT B
10 2. City’s Obligations.

(a) City shall pay MCWD all costs incurred by MCWD in conducting the WSA (“WSA Costs”). WSA Costs shall include all amounts paid by MCWD to Rincon in accordance with the PSA and reimbursement to MCWD for MCWD staff time. City’s WSA Costs payable to MCWD will include the amount to Rincon of Twenty -four Thousand Three Hundred Ninety- nine Dollars ( $26,838.90.00) and MCWD Staff time projected to be 10% of the professional services contracted amount.

(b) Upon completion of the WSA by MCWD and submittal to the City, City shall pay MCWD the WSA Costs within fifteen (15) business days of receiving and approving the detailed invoice from MCWD.

(c) City, at City’s own cost and expense, shall comply with all California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) laws and regulations with regards to City’s approval of the GP2045. City agrees to defend, indemnify, hold harmless and release MCWD, its officers, employees, attorneys, or agents from any claim, action or proceeding brought against any of them, the purpose of which is to attack, set aside, void, or annul, in whole or in part, the City’s approval of the GP2045 or environmental documents submitted to support it.

4. Billing Disputes. The City shall submit any billing dispute in writing to MCWD within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of the invoice. The Parties shall endeavor to timely resolve any such dispute and thereby allow payment of the balance due within a reasonable amount of time, although in the event of an unresolved dispute, City shall pay the undisputed invoice amount to MCWD within thirty (30) business days of receipt of invoice while the parties continue to resolve the dispute.

5. Indemnity/Hold Harmless. Except as specified in section 3(c), the Parties do hereby mutually agree to indemnify, defend, save, and hold harmless the other and their respective officers officials, agents, employees, contractors, or subcontractors from any and all liabilities, claims, demands, debts, damages, suits, actions and cause of action of whatsoever kind, nature, or sort, including but not by way of limitation, for wrongful death, and for the expenses of defense of said parties, and each of them and the payment of attorney’s fees in any such action, arising out or, or in any manner connected with any negligent act or omission of such indemnifying party or its contractors or subcontractors, done or performed in connection with such party’s duties and obligations hereunder. It is the mutual intention of the Parties that where comparative fault is determined to have been contributory, principles of comparative fault will be followed and each Party shall bear the proportionate cost of any damage attributabl e to the fault of that Party, its officers, officials, agents, employees, contractors, or subcontractors. The provisions of this indemnity shall survive the expiration or termination of this Reimbursement Agreement.

EXHIBIT B
11 6. Notice. All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be either personally delivered (which shall include delivery by means of professional overnight courier service which confirms receipt in writing [such as Federal Express or UPS]), sent by telecopier or facsimile (Fax) machine capable of confirming transmission and receipt, or sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid to the following parties at the following addresses or numbers:

If to MCWD: Marina Cost Water District
11 Reservation Road
Marina, CA 93933
Telephone: (831) 384-3161
Fax: (831) 883-5995

If to Marina: City of Marina
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, CA 93933
Telephone: (831) 884-1224
Fax: (831) 384-9148

Notices sent in accordance with this section shall be deemed delivered upon the next business day following the: (1) date of delivery as indicated on the written confirmation of delivery (if sent by overnight courier service); (2) the date of actual receipt (if personally delivered by other means); (3) date of transmission (if sent by telecopier or facsimile machine); or (4) the date of delivery as indicated on the return receipt (if sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested).

Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner detailed in this Section

13. 7. Severability. If any term, provision, condition, or covenant of this Reimbursement Agreement, or the application thereof to any party or circumstance, shall to any extent be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the instrument, or the application of such term, provision, condition, or covenant to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and each term and provision of this agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

8. Statutes and Law Governing. This Reimbursement Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the statutes and laws of the State of California.

9. Waiver. The Parties’ waiver of any term, condition or covenant, or breach of any term, condition or covenant shall not be construed as a waiver of any other term, condition or covenant or breach of any other term, condition or covenant.

10. No Third Party Beneficiary. This Reimbursement Agreement shall not be construed or deemed to be an agreement for the benefit of any third party or parties and no third party or parties shall have any clam or right of action hereunder for any cause whatsoever.

EXHIBIT B
12 11. Counterparts. This Reimbursement Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and when a counterpart shall have been signed by each party thereto, each shall be deemed an original, but all of which constitute one and the same instrument.

12. Entire Agreement . This Reimbursement Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties, and is intended by the parties to completely state the agreement in full. Any agreement or representation respecting the matters dealt with herein or the duties of any party in relation thereto, not expressly set forth in this agreement, is null and void.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Reimbursement Agreement to be signed on the dates written below:

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT CITY OF MARINA

Remleh Scherzinger Layne Long
General Manager City Manager

Date: 2025 Date: 2025

ATTEST: ATTEST: (Pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-__)

Paula Riso Anita Shepherd- Sharp
Clerk to the Board Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Roger Masuda Rene A. Ortega
District Legal Counsel City Attorney

EXHIBIT B
13 EXHIBIT A

“MCWD-RINCON Professional Services Agreement”

EXHIBIT B
14 June 11, 2025 Item No. 10g(2)
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 1, 2025
CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-,

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF MARINA AND NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC FOR

CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TELECOMMUNICATIONS

FACILITY ON CITY-OWNED PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CALIFORNIA AVE AND 3RD AVENUE (APN 031 -201-005), AND

AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY, SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY

CITY ATTORNEY
REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council:

1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 2025 - , approving an Amendment to the Lease Agreement between the City of Marina (City) and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC for construction and operation of a telecommunications facility on City -owned property at the northwest corner of California and 3rd avenue; and

2. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City, subject to final review and approval by City Attorney.

BACKGROUND:

At the regular meeting of September 19, 2023, the City Council of the City of Marina adopted Resolution No. 2023 -96, authorizing a Lease Agreement between the City of Marina and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC for construction and operation of a telecommunications facility on city owned property at the northwest corner of California Avenue and 3rd Avenue.

ANALYSIS:

In order to provide power to the facility, PG&E requires access over the leased area. The original agreement did not provide clear construction authorization for the electrical connection to take place. The proposed amendment to the agreement will allow PG &E to access lease area and construct the necessary facilities to power the telecommunications equipment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact should the City Council approve this request.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
Planning Commission f ound and determine d, in accordance with the California Quality Act (CEQA), that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review per a Class 3 Categorical Exemption Section 15303 of CEQA for New Construction and Conversion of Small Structures.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action. 1 Respectfully submitted,

Edrie Delos Santos, PE
Engineering Division
Public Works Department
REVIEWED/CONCUR:

Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF MARINA

APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF MARINA AND NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC FOR

CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TELECOMMUNICATIONS

FACILITY ON CITY-OWNED PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CALIFORNIA AVE AND 3RD AVENUE (APN 031-201-005), AND

AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY, SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL

BY THE CITY ATTORNEY

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of September 19, 2023, the City Council of the City of Marina adopted Resolution No. 2023-96, authorizing a Lease Agreement between the City of Marina and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC for construction and operation of a telecommunications facility on city owned property at the northwest corner of California Avenue and 3rd Avenue, and;

WHEREAS, in order to provide power to the facility, PG&E requires access over the leased area.

The original agreement did not provide clear construction authorization for the electrical connection to take place. The proposed amendment to the agreement will allow PG& E to access lease area and construct the necessary facilities to power the telecommunications equipment. There is no fiscal impact should the City Council approve this request, and;

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found and determined, in accordance with the California Quality Act (CEQA), that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review per a Class 3 Categorical Exemption Section 15303 of CEQA for New Construction and Conversion of Small Structures.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Approve an Amendment to the Lease Agreement between the City of Marina (City) and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC for construction and operation of a telecommunications facility on City-owned property at the northwest corner of California and 3rd avenue; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City, subject to final review and approval by City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, duly held on the 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
3 EXHIBIT A

TO STAFF REPORT
Market: Northern California
C
ell Site Number: CCL05573
Cell Site Name: California Ave. and Imjin Parkway (CA)
Fixed Asset Number: 15923553

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND LEASE AGREEMENT (“F
irst Amendment”),
dated as of the latter of the signature dates below (the “Effective Date”), is by and between the City of Marina, a municipal corporation, having a mailing address of 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, CA 93933 (“Landlord”) and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having a mailing address of 1025 Lenox Park Blvd NE, 3rd Floor, Atlanta, GA 30319 (“T enant”).

Landlord and Tenant may be hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party”.

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Land Lease Agreement as of March 25, 2024 (the "Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to confirm the easement and access rights associated with the utility route established in the Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:

1. Amendment to Access Provision. Paragraph 12, “Access” is hereby amended to add the following:
“In addition to the provisions of this Paragraph 12, and for the avoidance of any doubt regarding utility access rights, Landlord grants to Tenant and utility service supplier the right to receive utility services including, but not limited to electric facilities, appurtenances and associated equipment, and the right for the utility service supplier to excavate for, construct, reconstruct, replace (of initial or any other size), remove, maintain, inspect and use said utility facilities, together with the right for the utility service supplier to ingress and egress from said utility facilities across the Property as set forth in Exhibit 1-A. Landlord grants the right for the utility service supplier to trim or cut down any trees or brush within five (5) feet on each side of the centerline of said utility facilities if said utilities are underground and sixteen (16) feet on each side of the centerline of said utilities facilities if said facilities are above-ground. In addition, Landlord shall not erect or construct any building or other structure, or drill or operate any well within five (5) feet on each side of the centerline of said utility facilities if said utility facilities are underground and sixteen (16) feet on each side of the centerline of said utility facilities if said facilities are above-ground.”

2. Other Terms and Conditions Remain. In the event of any inconsistencies between the Agreement and this First Amendment, the terms of this First Amendment shall control. Except as expressly set forth in this First Amendment, the Agreement otherwise is unmodified and remains in 4 EXHIBIT A

TO STAFF REPORT

full force and effect. Each reference in the Agreement to itself shall be deemed also to refer to this First Amendment.

3. Capitalized Terms. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning as defined in the Agreement; and

4. Entirety; Counterparts. This First Amendment, together with the Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement among the undersigned parties hereto. Any modification to this First Amendment must be in writing and signed and delivered by authorized representatives of the Parties in order to be effective. This First Amendment will be governed by the laws of the state in which the Premises is located. This First Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, which may be delivered electronically, but all of which taken together shall constitute one instrument.

5. Electronic Signatures. The Parties that this First Amendment and any other documents to be delivered in connection herewith may be electronically signed, and that any electronic signatures appearing on this First Amendment or such other documents are the same as handwritten signatures for the purposes of validity, enforceability, and admissibility.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First Amendment to be effective as of the last date written below.

“Landlord”

City of Marnia,
a municipal corporation

By: _________________________
Print Name: __________________
Its:_________________________
Date: _______________________

“Tenant”

New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By: AT&T Mobility Corporation
Its: Manager

By: _________________________
Print Name: __________________
Its: _________________________
Date: _______________________

5 EXHIBIT A

TO STAFF REPORT

Exhibit 1A

Page 1 of 2 ends

Utility Services

PG&E Drawing entitled “Construction Sketch” dated 8/30/23 appears on following page

6 7
June 27, 2025 Item No. 10g(3)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 1, 2025

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 202 5-,

AMENDING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)

REGARDING COOPERATIVE ASSISTANCE TO COMPLY WITH
SENATE BILL 1383, FOOD WASTE REDUCTION AND ORGANICS

RECYCLING REGULATIONS , INCORPORATING CHANGES IN THE

ANNUAL COST OF PROGRAM ACTIVITIES , AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE MOU SUBJECT TO FINAL

REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY , AND

AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY
ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider adopting Resolution 2025- for the following action:

1. Amending the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding cooperative assistance to comply with Senate Bill 1383, Food Waste Reduction and Organics Recycling Regulations, incorporating changes in the annual cost of program activities; and

2. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the amended MOU with revised EXHIBIT A and EXHIBIT B subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney; and

3. Authorizing the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

BACKGROUND:

The State of California has passed legislation, known as Senate Bill 1383, California’s Short-Lived Climate Pollutants legislation. The regulation has significant impact on each Member Agency with the goal of reducing organic material being landfilled by 75% by 2025, compared to a 2014 basis.

The legislation mandates that Member Agencies unde rtake certain activities around the handling of organic waste materials collected within their jurisdictions. The regulation also requires 20% recovery of edible food by 2025 to direct it to a beneficial use and thus, prevent it from entering the waste stream. Regulations took effect and local program implementation began on January 1, 2022.

The City of Marina is a Member Agency of ReGen Monterey (ReGen), formerly known as MRWMD Joints Powers Authority , which is responsible for managing solid waste on behalf of the Cities and unincorporated County communities of coastal Monterey County. The City participates on the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for SB 1383 led by ReGen and comprised of staff from each member jurisdiction, the three haulers in the ReGen service area, and ReGen staff.

While the regulation places the program implementation responsibility on the member jurisdictions, the TAC has been collectively analyzing who best should implement each element of the regulation between the member jurisdictions, waste haulers, or ReGen. The TAC determined that many of the requirements are best completed using shared resources. As such, an MOU between ReGen and each of its member jurisdictions was created to have ReGen incur the shared costs and bill each member jurisdiction twice annually for reimbursement. The City Council adopted Resolution 2021 -93 on August 17th, 2021 approving the MOU between ReGen and Member Jurisdictions for SB 1383 Shared Costs. Since the MOU was adopted in 2021, the Member Agencies have annually adopted revisions to Exhibit s A and B of the MOU which establish member agency costs for FY 2025-2026.
1 ANALYSIS:

Each year ReGen staff identifies expected expenses associated with jurisdictional compliance with SB 1383 and compiles those expenses in Exhibit A of the SB 1383 Shared Costs MOU. Expenses include items such as program administration, public education, monitoring, reporting and edible food recovery capacity building, program administration and outreach. These expenses are then broken down to proportional percentages per population in Exhibit B. The draft budget is first presented to the TAC for review, feed back, and consensus. It then is presented to the ReGen Monterey Board of Directors and Member Agencies’ Councils and Boards for approval. The amendment to Exhibits A and B of the MOU would supersede exhibits covering previous fiscal years.

On May 23, 2025, the ReGen Board of Directors approved revised Exhibits A and B of the MOU which establish member agency costs for FY 2025-2026.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The estimated annual expense to Marina for FY 2025-2026 will be $69,729 as shown in Exhibit B of the draft MOU (see Attachment), which outlines the estimated annual expenses to each Member Agency of ReGen. This is an increase of $9,747 from FY 2024-2025. These expenses are averaged and weighted on various factors providing an "economy of scale" to each Member Agency depending upon their needs. This includes expenses related to SB 1383 implementation, general shared and monitoring costs for Member Agencies, and franchise agreement management. These efforts, as with past solid waste efforts, are funded through franchise fees collected and remitted to the City.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and action.

EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A – Revised Exhibit A of the Memorandum of Understanding for FY 2025-2026.

Exhibit B – Revised Exhibit B of the Memorandum of Understanding for FY 2025-2026 Exhibit C – Memorandum of Understanding for 2024-2025

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA AMENDING

THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) REGARDING COOPERATIVE ASSISTANCE TO COMPLY WITH SENATE BILL 1383, FOOD WASTE REDUCTION

AND ORGANICS RECYCLING REGULATIONS, INCORPORATING CHANGES IN THE

ANNUAL COST OF PROGRAM ACTIVITIES, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE THE MOU SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE

CITY ATTORNEY, AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES.

WHEREAS, in September 2016, Governor Edmund Brown Jr. set methane emissions reduction targets for California (SB 1383 Lara, Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016) in a statewide effort to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCP); and

WHEREAS, the City of Marina is a Member Agency of ReGen Monterey (ReGen ), formerly known as MRWMD Joints Powers Authority, which is responsible for managing solid waste on behalf of the Cities and unincorporated County communities of coastal Monterey County. The City participates on the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for SB 1383 led by ReGen and comprised of staff from each member jurisdiction, the three haulers in the ReGen service area, and ReGen staff; and

WHEREAS, w hile the regulation places the program implementation responsibility on the member jurisdictions, the TAC has been collectively analyzing who best should implement each element of the regulation between the member jurisdictions, waste haulers, or ReGen. Th e TAC determined that many of the requirements are best completed using shared resources. As such, an MOU between ReGen and each of its member jurisdictions was created to have ReGen incur the shared costs and bill each member jurisdiction twice annually for reimbursement. The City Council adopted Resolution 2021-93 on August 17th, 2021 approving the MOU between ReGen and Member Jurisdictions for SB 1383 Shared Costs; and

WHEREAS, each year ReGen staff identifies expected expenses associated with jurisdictional compliance with SB 1383 and compiles those expenses in Exhibit A of the 1383 Shared Costs MOU. Expenses include items such as program administration, public education, monitor ing, reporting and edible food recovery capacity building, program administration and outreach. These expenses are then broken down to proportional percentages per population in Exhibit B. The draft budget is first presented to the TAC for review , feedback, and consensus. It then is presented to the ReGen Monterey Board of Directors and Member Agencies’ Councils and Boards for approval. The amendment to Exhibits A and B of the MOU would supersede exhibits covering previous fiscal years; and

WHEREAS, on May 25, 2025, the ReGen Board of Directors approved revised Exhibits A and B of the MOU which establish member agency costs for FY 202-2026;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Amend the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding cooperative assistance to comply with Senate Bill 1383, Food Waste Reduction and Organics Recycling Regulations, incorporating changes in the annual cost of program activities; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the amended MOU (Exhibit A) subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney; and

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries. 3 Resolution No. 2025-
Page Two

PASSES AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 4th day of June 2024 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 1

EXHBIT A

DETAILED ACTIVITIES & COSTS
FY 2025-2026

Scope of Work
The activities related to the implementation of SB 1383 may include contracting and policy development; public education; materials purchasing and distribution; reporting; contamination monitoring; edible food waste recovery; enforcement; procurement; organics processing; rate setting; cost monitoring; and any other related activities the Parties choose to address.

The District will take the lead producing public education campaigns in concert with the already provided Hauler and/or Member Agency resources. The Member Agencies will be responsible for production and mailing fees associated with outreach. The District will also contract with a vendor to administer contamination monitoring in the form of curbside lid flipping. The District will also provide CalRecycle reporting services to the Member Agencies. In addition, funds will be allocated to food recovery organizations for procurement of refrigerated holding facilities or transport vehicles to support edible food recovery efforts.

Costs

5 1

EXHBIT B

MEMBER AGENCIES’ ANNUAL PROPORTIONATE SHARES & COSTS*
FY 2025-2026

*Member Agencies’ proportionate costs subject to adjustment annually in accordance with any change in scope and total costs.

Member agencies will be invoiced an annual amount not to exceed column below titled “with minimums.”
6 1

ME MORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETW

EEN THE MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND ITS

MEMBER AGENCIES REGARDING ASSISTANCE WITH COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL 1383
T
his Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is made and entered into as of the date of the signatures set forth below by and between the MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (“District”, “MRWMD”), a California Garbage and Refuse Disposal District, and its member agencies including the cities of CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA, DEL REY OAKS, MARINA, MONTEREY, PACIFIC GROVE, SAND CITY, and SEASIDE; THE PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT; and THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY (“Member Agencies”). Collectively these entities shall be known herein as “Parties” or individually as a “Party.”
Reci tals
A. The
State of California has passed legislation, known as Senate Bill 1383, California’s Short-Lived Climate Pollutants regulation. The regulation will have significant impact on each Member Agency, with the goal of reducing organic material being landfilled by 75% by 2025, compared to a 2014 basis. The legislation mandates that Member Agencies undertake certain activities around the handling of organic waste materials collected within their jurisdictions. The regulation also requires 20% recovery of edible food by 2025 to direct it to a beneficial use and thus prevent it from entering the waste stream. Regulations take effect, and local program implementation will begin, on January 1, 2022.

B. Th
e Member Agencies have determined that it is in their best interest to coordinate their activities related to this legislation. This coordination is being facilitated by the District’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) comprised of staff from each Member Agency, the three Haulers in the District service area (Haulers), Salinas Valley Recycles (SVR) and MRWMD.

C. Th
e Member Agencies have further determined that the District has the expertise and resources necessary to implement some of these activities on the Member Agencies’ behalf and have now requested that the District incur costs to provide these activities.

D. Th
e Member Agencies have agreed to reimburse the District for proportionate shares of certain designated annual costs incurred by the District for these activities.

E. Th
e form and content of this MOU have been presented to the TAC, and the TAC has recommended it for approval by the Parties
N
OW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the District and the Member Agencies, and of the promises contained in this MOU, the Parties agree as

EXHIBIT C
7 2
follows:

Section 1. Recitals: The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this MOU.

Section 2. Purpose: The purpose of this MOU is to provide a structure for the Member Agencies to reimburse the District for SB 1383 related activities it performs on behalf of the Member Agencies.

Section 3. Voluntary: This MOU is voluntarily entered into by the Parties for the purpose of facilitating the implementation of SB 1383.

Section 4. Term: This MOU shall become effective on the last day of its execution by a Party and shall remain in effect until terminated by the Parties.

Section 5. Scope of Work, Costs & Cost Sharing: The scope of work, and associated costs, are set out in Exhibit A, entitled Detailed Activities and Costs, attached hereto and incorporated herein. Allocation of such costs to the Member Agencies is set out in Exhibit B, entitled Member Agencies’ Annual Proportionate Shares and Costs, attached hereto and incorporated herein. Exhibit C outlines estimated individual Member Agencies’ allocations related to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program (OWR1: 2021-22), attached hereto and incorporated herein. Exhibit D defines the estimated annual procurement requirements of organic material and estimated cost per ton of compost for each Member Agency, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

No later than March 1 of each year, and at such other times as directed by the Parties, the TAC shall meet to consider and, if deemed necessary, modify Exhibits A, B, C, and/or D subject to direction from the governing bodies of each Member Agency to its TAC representative.

Section 6. The District Agrees:

(a) District staff will manage activities as identified in Exhibit A, C, and D which activities include contracting with third party vendors when reasonably necessary and paying those vendors for contracted costs.

(b) Two times per year, on dates to be determined by the TAC, District will invoice Member Agencies for each Member Agency’s proportionate share of costs as shown in Exhibit B with each invoice to be fifty percent (50%) of the Member Agency’s share of costs.

(c) Upon award of CalRecycle SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program funds, the District will invoice Member Agencies for their full allocation of grant funds as shown in Exhibit C. Four times during the grant term, aligned with dates identified by CalRecycle grant Terms & Conditions, the District shall report to Member Agencies a summary of actual grant expenditures and progress toward grant tasks to date.

EXHIBIT C
8 3

(d) District will maintain an accounting of activities and expenses and provide reconciliation of payments annually. Material differences between estimated costs and actual incurred costs will result in either: 1) an adjustment made to the final annual payment for each Member Agency, or 2) such cost difference shall be incorporated into the subsequent year cost allocation.

(e) In year one only, in recognition of expected continuation of improved recycling revenues for the District from recyclable material sales, the District will off-set $140,000 of the costs identified in Exhibit A. This off-set is reflected in the cost allocations set out in Exhibit B for FY 2021-22.

Section 7. The Member Agencies Agree:

(a) To reimburse the District for all expenses incurred by the District under this MOU in accordance with each Member Agency’s proportionate share as shown on Exhibit B, C, and D.

(b) To make a full-faith effort to cooperate with one another and with the District to achieve the purposes of this MOU by providing information, reviewing information in a timely manner, and informing their respective administration and governing bodies.

Section 8. Termination. Any Party may terminate its participation in this MOU upon giving written notice to the District no later than April 1 of any calendar year during the term of this MOU. Within ten days following a Party’s termination date, such party shall pay District all charges then due and payable and shall pay when determined any additional charges that shall later come due under the MOU, subject to the limits set out in Exhibits A, B, C, and D.

Section 9. General Provisions.

(a) This MOU is binding and for the benefit of the respective successors, heirs, and assigns of each Party and the District; provided however, no Party may assign its respective rights or obligations under this MOU without the prior written consent of the District.

(b) This MOU is governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

(c) If any provision of this MOU is determined by any court to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, then the remainder of this MOU will not be affected, and this MOU will be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this MOU.

(d) Waiver by the District or any Party to this MOU of any term, condition, or covenant of this MOU will not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant.

EXHIBIT C
9 4
Waiver by the District or any Party of any breach of the provisions of this MOU will not constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this MOU.

(e) This MOU may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which is an original but all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument, provided, however, that such counterparts have been delivered to all parties to this MOU.

(f) All parties acknowledge they have been represented, or have had the opportunity to be represented, by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this MOU. Accordingly, this MOU will be construed according to its fair language. Any ambiguities will be resolved in a collaborative manner by the District and the Parties and must be rectified by amending this MOU.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the District and the Parties have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date of their respective signatures.

MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT C
10 5

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT C
11 6

CITY OF DEL REY OAKS

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT C
12 7

CITY OF MARINA

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT C
13 8

CITY OF MONTEREY

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT C
14 9

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT C
15 10

SAND CITY

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT C
16 11

CITY OF SEASIDE

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT C
17 12

PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT C
18 13

COUNTY OF MONTEREY

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT C
19 14

EXHIBIT A

DETAILED ACTIVITIES & COSTS
FY 2024-2025

The District will take the lead producing public education campaigns in concert with the already- provided Hauler and/or Member Agency resources. The Member Agencies will be responsible for production and mailing fees associated with outreach. The District will also contract with a vendor to administer contamination monitoring in the form of curbside lid flipping. The District will also provide CalRecycle reporting services to the Member Agencies. In addition, funds will be allocated to food recovery organizations for procurement of refrigerated holding facilities or transport vehicles to support edible food recovery efforts.

Costs

EXHIBIT C
20 15

EXHIBIT A

DETAILED ACTIVITIES & COSTS
FY 2024-2025 (CONTINUED)

EXHIBIT C
21 16

EXHIBIT B

MEMBER AGENCIES’ ANNUAL PROPORTIONATE SHARES & COSTS*
FY 2024-2025

*Member Agencies’ proportionate costs subject to adjustment annually in accordance with any change in scope and total costs. Costs “with minimums” will be utilized.

EXHIBIT C
22 17

EXHIBIT C

MEMBER AGENCIES’ ESTIMATED ALLOCATION OF CALRECYCLE LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM FUNDING (OWR1: 2021-22)**

The Member Agencies of Carmel, Del Rey Oaks, Marina, Monterey, Sand City, Seaside, Pacific Grove, and the Pebble Beach Community Services District (PBCSD) join the Local Assistance Grant Program as a regional collaborative project for the implementation of regulation requirements associated with SB 1383, in coordination with other jurisdictions of the Monterey County region to maximize project impact and cost-effectiveness across the countywide area.

This regional grant-funded project will be coordinated through the two local waste management governmental agencies within Monterey County, Monterey Regional Waste Management (MRWMD), and Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority (SVSWA).

The Member Agencies, along with each of the MRWMD and SVSWA member agencies are applying individually to this grant program using a unified regional project design, budget and implementation approach. All participating jurisdictions’ individual grant funding will be pooled together and expended in a cooperative manner by their agencies’ respective waste districts, MRWMD and SVSWA. The County of Monterey is applying separately and will manage its budget and project implementation independently, in coordination with broader regional planning efforts.

Based on current regional needs and findings to date related to SB 1383 in Monterey County, the following four major components will comprise the principal focus areas of program expenditures under the proposed regional project approach:

1) Grant Management, Tracking & Reporting
2) Agency Procurement Support
3) Edible Food Recovery Implementation and Capacity Building 4) Organics & Edible Food Recovery Education, Outreach and Technical Assistance

Each element will be informed by regional coordination through the established MRWMD and SVSWA Technical Advisory Committee forums, Capacity Planning Assessments and related studies completed or in process throughout the region, and new data and information obtained through program implementation trials, stakeholder feedback and best practices as identified.

All expenditures will be incurred jointly, facilitated through each respective waste agency, and tracked and reported by each jurisdiction, based on the percentage of grant funds received by each agency compared to the full funding received collectively by all participating member agencies. CalRecycle, based on per capita calculations, using the Department of Finance’s January 2021 population statistics, estimates jurisdictions’ proportionate grant allocations. A summary of individual and collective agency grant allocations is presented below as Table 1.

EXHIBIT C
23 18
Table 1. Thirteen Agency Collaborative Approach Budget Summary

** Working in coordination with the designated CalRecycle grant manager or other agency representatives as appropriate, the region may adjust these proposed expenditure areas, amounts, or priorities, consistent with grant expenditure eligibility requirements, as needed during the course of the grant term based on the needs of the region.

Agencies Estimated
Funding
% of District
Subtotal
% of Region
Total
Waste
District
Carmel-by-the-Sea $20,000 9% 4% MRWMD
Del Rey Oaks $20,000 9% 4% MRWMD
Marina $29,771 14% 6% MRWMD
Monterey $38,247 18% 7% MRWMD
Pacific Grove $21,398 10% 4% MRWMD
Sand City $20,000 9% 4% MRWMD
Seaside $43,151 20% 8% MRWMD
Pebble Beach Community
Services District
$20,000 9% 4% MRWMD
Subtotal (MRWMD): $212,566 100% 41%

Gonzales $20,000 6% 4% SVSWA
Greenfield $25,157 8% 5% SVSWA
King City $20,665 7% 4% SVSWA
Salinas $211,143 68% 40% SVSWA
Soledad $33,095 11% 6% SVSWA
Subtotal (SVSWA): $310,060 100% 59%
TOTAL (13 Agency Regional
Approach):

$522,626

100%

EXHIBIT C
24 19

EXHIBIT D
MEMBER AGENCIES’ ESTIMATED PROCURMENT REQUIRMENTS

OF ORGANIC MATERIAL

The list below indicates the annual recovered organic waste product procurement targets for each jurisdiction (city, county, or city and county) that will be in effect from January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2026 per CalRecycle.

EXHIBIT C
25 June 27, 2025 Item No. 10g(4)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 1, 2025

CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -,

AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO

WALD, RUHNKE & D OST ARCHITECTS, LLP (WRD) FOR

ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE FIRE STA TION #2 EXPANSION PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO
FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND

AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY
ACCOUNTING AND BUGETARY ENTRIES.

REQUEST: It is requested that the City Council:

1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 2025- authorizing a professional services agreement with Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP (WRD) for architectural and design services for the Fire Station #2 Expansion Project beginning July 2, 2025, in an amount not to exceed $131,475.00.

2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the agreement on behalf of the City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

BACKGROUND:

Fire Station #2, located at the Marina Municipal Airport, plays a crucial role in delivering emergency fire services to the City of Marina and surrounding areas. Over time, the station’s existing facilities have become insufficient to meet current operatio nal needs. Fire Department staff have outgrown the station, which now necessitates an expansion to accommodate additional personnel, equipment, and improved facilities. Presently, the station houses a crew of 3 -4 firefighters on duty, including both male a nd female staff, who share a single bathroom and shower, an inadequate setup for the current staffing levels. Storage space is limited, affecting the storage of personal items, department supplies, and protective gear. The existing office areas do not prov ide sufficient privacy or space, and storage for PPE such as firefighter turnouts is suboptimal, being stored in the engine bay exposed to exhaust fumes..

ANALYSIS:

The proposed expansion aims to address these deficiencies by increasing the size and functionality of Fire Station #2. Key improvements include:
• Expanding housing and crew facilities to support current staffing levels and future growth • Providing additional restrooms and shower facilities to ensure adequate sanitation for all personnel
• Increasing storage capacity for personal belongings, department supplies, and PPE, including dedicated, well-ventilated storage for firefighter turnouts • Upgrading office spaces to improve privacy and efficiency • Enlarging the Engine Bay to comfortably accommodate current fire trucks and the ladder truck expected to arrive in late 2025

1 The City Co uncil approved in the New Fiscal year 2025-2026 and 2026 -2027 budget a Capital Project for the renovation of Fire Station No. 2 for $1.2 million.

Approving an agreement with WRD to develop the design and construction drawings will allow this important project to move forward quickly.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total fiscal impact for the staff report is estimated at $131,475. This amount will be financed through funds already allocated in the Capital Improvement Project HSF 2608.

EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A – Professional Services Agreement with Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP.

Exhibit B – Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP Proposal and Scope of Services for design of the Fire Station #2 Expansion Project

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF MARINA AUTHORIZING A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO WALD, RUHNKE & DOST

ARCHITECTS, LLP (WRD) FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE FIRE STATION #2 EXPANSION PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE CONTRACT

DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE

NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND BUGETARY ENTRIES

WHEREAS, Fire Station #2, located at the Marina Municipal Airport, provides essential emergency fire services to the City of Marina and surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the existing facilities at Fire Station #2 have become inadequate to meet current staffing, storage, and operational needs; and
WHEREAS, an expansion of Fire Station #2 is necessary to improve housing, sanitation facilities, storage space, and the Engine Bay to support current and future fire service demands; and WHEREAS, the City Staff has identified Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP (WRD) as a qualified and experienced firm to provide architectural and design services for the station expansion project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the staff report and recommends moving forward with the Professional Services Agreement to facilitate efficient and effective project development.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025- authorizing a professional services agreement with Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP (WRD) for architectural and design services for the Fire Station #2 Expansion Project beginning July 2, 2025, in an amount not to exceed $131,475.00.

2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the agreement on behalf of the City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 1st Day of July, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
3 1

CITY OF MARINA

AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on July 2, 2025, by and between the City of Marina, a California charter city, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and Wald, Ruhnke, and Dost Architects, LLP, a Limited Liability Partnership hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor." City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to as "party" and collectively as "parties" in this Agreement.

Recitals
A. City desires to retain Contractor to:

Provide architectural and design services for the Fire Station #2 Expansion Project, hereinafter referred to as the "Project."
B. Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and personnel necessary to properly perform the services as set forth herein.

C. City desires to retain Contractor to provide such services.

Terms and Conditions
For of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Contractor agree to the following terms and conditions:

1. Scope of Work.
(a) Contractor is hereby hired and retained by the City to work in a cooperative manner with the City to fully and adequately perform those services set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto (“Scope of Work”) and by this reference made a part hereof. With prior written notice to Contractor, City may elect to delete certain tasks of the Scope of Work at its sole discretion.
(b) Contractor shall perform all such work with skill and diligence and pursuant to generally accepted standards of practice in effect at the time of performance. Contractor shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for work which fails to meet these standards and which is reported to Contractor in writing within sixty days of discovery. Should Contractor fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations under this Agreement, the City may render or undertake the performance thereof and the Contractor shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred. (c) If services under this Agreement are to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined in California Civil Code §2782.8(b)(2), design professional certifies that all design professional services shall be provided by a person or persons duly licensed by the State of California to provide the type of services described in Section 1(a). By delivery of completed work, design professional certifies that the work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state and local laws, and the professional standard of care in California.

EXHIBIT A
4 2

(d) Contractor is responsible for making an independent evaluation and judgment of all relevant conditions affecting performance of the work, including without limitation site conditions, existing facilities, seismic, geologic, soils, hydrologic, geographic, climatic conditions, applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations and all other contingencies or considerations.

(e) City shall cooperate with Contractor and will furnish all information data, records and reports existing and available to City to enable Contractor to carry out work outlined in Exhibit “A." Contractor shall be entitled to reasonably rely on information, data, records and reports furnished by the City, however, the City makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any such information, data, records or reports available to it and provided to Contractor which were furnished to the City by a third party. Contractor shall have a duty to bring to the City's attention any deficiency or error it may discover in any information provided to the Contractor by the City or a third party.

2. Term of Agreement & Commencement of Work.

(a) Unless otherwise provided, the term of this Agreement shall begin on July 2, 2025 and shall expire on December 31, 2026, unless extended by amendment or terminated earlier as provided herein. The date of full execution is defined as the date when all of the following events have occurred:

(i) This Agreement has been approved by the City's Council or by the board, officer or employee authorized to give such approval; and

(ii) The office of the City Attorney has indicated in writing its approval of this Agreement as to form; and

(iii) This Agreement has been signed on behalf of Contractor by the person or persons authorized to bind the Contractor hereto; and.

(iv) This Agreement has been signed on behalf of the City by the person designated to so sign by the City's Council or by the officer or employee authorized to enter into this Contract and is attested to by the Marina City Clerk.

(b) Contractor shall commence work on the Project on or by July 2, 2025. This Agreement may be extended upon written agreement of both parties. Contractor may be required to prepare a written schedule for the work to be performed, which schedule shall be approved by the City and made a part of Exhibit A, and to perform the work in accordance with the approved schedule.

3. Compensation.

(a) City liability for compensation to Contractor under this Agreement shall only be to the extent of the present appropriation to fund this Agreement. For services to be provided under this Agreement City shall compensate Contractor in an amount not to exceed One Hundred Thirty-One Thousand, Four Hundred Seventy Five Dollars ($ 131,475.00) in accordance with the provisions of this Section.

EXHIBIT A
5 3

(b) Invoice(s) in a format and on a schedule acceptable to the City shall be submitted to and be reviewed and verified by the Project Administrator (see Section 5(a)) and forwarded to the City's Finance Department for payment. City shall notify Contractor of exceptions or disputed items and their dollar value within fifteen days of receipt. Payment of the undisputed amount of the invoice will typically be made approximately thirty days after the invoice is submitted to the Finance Department.

(c) Contractor will maintain clearly identifiable, complete and accurate records with respect to all costs incurred under this Agreement on an industry recognized accounting basis. Contractor shall make available to the representative of City all such books and records related to this Agreement, and the right to examine, copy and audit the same during regular business hours upon 24-hour's notice for a period of four years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

(d) Contractor shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work that is determined by the City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project but which is not included within the Scope of Work and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

(e) Expenses not otherwise addressed in the Scope of Services or the Fee Schedule incurred by Contractor in performing services under this Agreement shall be reviewed and approved in advance by the Project Administrator (Section 5(a)), be charged at cost and reimbursed to Contractor.

(f) There shall be no charge for transportation within Monterey, Santa Cruz and San Benito Counties required for the performance of the services under this Agreement; travel to other locations must be approved in writing and in advance by the City, mileage will be charged at the then current standard rate for business travel as set by the U.S.

Internal Revenue Service for such approved travel.

4. Termination or Suspension.

(a) This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by either party in the event of a substantial failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement through no fault of the terminating party, provided that no termination may be effected unless the other party is given (1) not less than ten days written notice of intent to terminate, and (2) provided an opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination.

(b) If termination for default is effected by the City, an equitable adjustment in the price provided for in this Agreement shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed services or other work, and (2) any payment due the Contractor at the time of termination may be adjusted to cover any additional costs to the City because of the Contractor's default. If after the termination for failure of Contractor to fulfill its contractual obligations, it is determined that the Contractor had not failed to fulfill contractual obligations, the termination shall be deemed to have been for the convenience of the City.

(c) The City may terminate or suspend this Agreement at any time for its convenience upon not less than thirty days prior written notice to Contractor. Not later

EXHIBIT A
6 4

than the effective date of such termination or suspension, Contractor shall discontinue all affected work and deliver all work product and other documents, whether completed or in progress, to the City.

(d) If termination for default is effected by the Contractor or if termination for convenience is effected by the City, the equitable adjustment shall include a reasonable profit for services or other work performed. The equitable adjustment for termination shall provide for payment to the Contractor for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to the termination, in addition to termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by Contractor relating to written commitments that were executed prior to the termination.

5. Project Administrator, Project Manager & Key Personnel.

(a) City designates as its Project Administrator Ismael Hernandez who shall have the authority to act for the City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator or his/her authorized representative shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to the work to be performed pursuant to this Agreement.

(b) Contractor designates Henry Ruhnke as its Project Manager who shall coordinate all phases of the Project. The Project manager shall be available to City at all reasonable times during the Agreement term.

(c) Contractor warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.

Contractor, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of its personnel assigned to the performance of services upon written request of City.

Contractor has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the work under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Contractor may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of the City. In the event that City and Contractor cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause.

6. Delegation of Work.

(a) If Contractor utilizes any subcontractors, consultants, persons, employees or firms having applicable expertise to assist Contractor in performing the services under this Agreement, Contractor shall obtain City's prior written approval to such employment.

Contractor's contract with any subcontractor shall contain a provision making the subcontract subject to all provisions of this Agreement. Contractor will be fully responsible and liable for payment for, administration, completion, presentation, and quality of all work performed. If such persons are utilized, they shall be charged at cost.

City reserves its right to employ other contractors in connection with this Project.

(b) If the work hereunder is performed by a design professional, design professional shall be directly involved with performing the work or shall work through his, her or its employees. The design professional's responsibilities under this Agreement shall not be delegated. The design professional shall be responsible to the City for acts, errors or omissions of his, her or its subcontractors. Negligence of subcontractors or agents retained by the design professional is conclusively deemed to be the negligence

EXHIBIT A
7 5

of the design professional if not adequately corrected by the design professional. Use of the term subcontractor in any other provision of this Agreement shall not be construed to imply authorization for a design professional to use subcontractors for performance of any professional service under this Agreement.

(c) The City is an intended beneficiary of any work performed by a subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subcontractor and the City.

7. Skill of Employees. Contractor shall ensure that any employees or agents providing services under this Agreement possess the requisite skill, training and experience to properly perform such services.

8. Confidential and Proprietary Information. In the course of performing services under this Agreement Contractor may obtain, receive, and review confidential or proprietary documents, information or materials that are and shall remain the exclusive property of the City. Should Contractor undertake the work on behalf of other agencies, entities, firms or persons relating to the matters described in the Scope of Work, it is expressly agreed by Contractor that any such confidential or proprietary information or materials shall not be provided or disclosed in any manner to any of Contractor’s other clients, or to any other third party, without the City’s prior express written consent.

9. Ownership of Data. Unless otherwise provided for herein, all documents, material, data, drawings, plans, specifications, computer data files, basis for design calculations, engineering notes, and reports originated and prepared by Contractor, or any subcontractor of any tier, under this Agreement shall be and remain the property of the City for its use in any manner it deems appropriate. Contractor agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant to this Agreement shall be vested in the City and waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or intellectual property rights in favor of the City. Contractor shall provide two (2) sets of reproducible of the above-cited items, except for the computer data files which shall consist of one (1) set. Contractor shall use all reasonable efforts to ensure that any electronic files provided to the City will be compatible with the City's computer hardware and software.

Contractor makes no representation as to long-term compatibility, usability or readability of the format resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems or computer hardware differing from those in use by the City at the commencement of this Agreement. Contractor shall be permitted to maintain copies of all such data for its files. City acknowledges that its use of the work product is limited to the purposes contemplated by the Scope of Work and, should City use these products or data in connection with additions to the work required under this Agreement or for new work without consultation with and without additional compensation to Contractor, Contractor makes no representation as to the suitability of the work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the Scope of Work and shall have no liability or responsibility whatsoever in connection with such use which shall be at the City's sole risk. Any and all liability arising out of changes made by the City to Contractor's deliverables is waived against Contractor unless City has given Contractor prior written notice of the changes and has received Contractor's written consent to such changes.

10. Conflict of Interest.

(a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner

EXHIBIT A
8 6

with the interests of the City or which would in any way hinder Contractor’s performance of services under this Agreement. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of the City in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall represent the interest of the City in any discussion or negotiation.

(b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor may be, as of the date of commencement of services under this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of the City relative to such projects.

Any future position of the City on such projects may result in a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.

11. Disclosure. Contractor may be subject to the appropriate disclosure requirements of the California Fair Political Practices Act, as determined by the City Manager.

12. Non-Discrimination.

(a) During the performance of this Agreement the Contractor and its subcontractors shall comply with the applicable laws of the United States of America, the State of California and the City prohibiting discrimination and harassment. In performing this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate, harass, or allow harassment, against any employee or applicant for employment because of gender, gender expression, gender identity, genetic characteristics, sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), medical condition (including cancer), mental disability, age, marital status, denial of family and medical care leave and denial of pregnancy disability leave, sexual orientation, military/veteran status and any other characteristics protected by state or federal law. Contractor shall give written notice of its obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which it has a collective bargaining or other agreement.
(b) Contractor shall include the provisions of this Section 12(a) in all subcontracts related to this Agreement.

13. Indemnification.

(a) Other than in the performance of design professional services by a design professional, which shall be solely as addressed by subsection (b) below, and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, immediately defend (with independent counsel reasonably acceptable to the City) and hold harmless the City, its Council, boards, commissions, employees, officials and agents (collectively "Indemnified Parties" or in the singular "Indemnified Party") from and against any claims, losses, damages, penalties, fines and judgments, associated investigation and administrative expenses, and defense costs including but not limited to reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, expert witness fees and costs of alternate dispute resolution (collectively "Liabilities“), where same arise out of the performance of this Agreement by Contractor,

EXHIBIT A
9 7

its officers, employees, agents and sub -contractors. The duty to defend is a separate and distinct obligation from the Contractor’s duty to indemnify and Contractor shall be obligated to defend in all legal, equitable, administrative or special proceedings upon tender to the Contractor of any claim in any form or at any stage of an action or proceeding, whether or not liability is established and the obligation extends through final judgment including exhaustion of any appeals.. The Contractor’s obligation to indemnify applies unless it is finally determined that the liability was caused by the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of an indemnified party. If it is finally determined that liability is caused by the comparative active negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party, the Contractor’s indemnification obligation shall be reduced in proportion to the established comparative liability of the indemnified party.

(b) To the fullest extent permitted by law (including without limitation California Civil Code Sections 2782.8), when the services to be provided under this Agreement are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined by said section 2782.8(c)(2) (“Design Professional”) Design Professional shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless any Indemnified Party for all Liabilities regardless of nature or type that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Design Professional, or such acts or omissions of an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of the Design Professional. Design Professional shall not have an immediate duty to defend an Indemnified Party, however, Design Professional’s obligation to indemnify (including reimbursing the cost to defend) and hold the Indemnified Parties harmless applies unless it is finally determined that the liability was caused by the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party. If it is finally determined that liability was caused by the comparative active negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party the Design Professional’s indemnification obligation shall be reduced in direct proportion to the indemnified party’s proportionate percentage of fault. Within 30 days following Design Professional’s receipt of a properly presented written invoice Design Profession al shall satisfy its indemnification obligations and reimburse the Indemnified Party for the cost of reasonable attorney’s fees and defense costs incurred by the Indemnified Party to the same extent of Design Professional’s indemnity obligation herein. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Design Professional exceed the Design Professional’s proportionate percentage of fault.

(c) The provisions of this Section are not limited by the provisions of sections relating to insurance including provisions of any worker's compensation act or similar act. Contractor expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statues or laws as to City, its employees and officials. An allegation or determination of comparative active negligence or willful misconduct by an Indemnified Party unrelated to design professional services does not relieve Contractor from its separate and distinct obligation to defend City. Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every subcontractor, sub tier contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance or subject matter of this Agreement. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder.

EXHIBIT A
10 8

(d) If any action or proceeding is brought against any Indemnified Party by reason of any of the matters against which the Contractor has agreed to provide an immediate defense to any Indemnified Party, as provided above, Contractor, upon notice from the City, shall defend the Indemnified Party at Contractor's expense by independent counsel reasonably acceptable to the City. Unless otherwise provided above, an Indemnified Party need not have first paid for any of the matters to which it is entitled to indemnification in order to be so defended. Contractor may submit a claim to the City for reasonable defense costs (including attorney’s and expert fees) incurred in providing a defense of any Indemnified Party to the extent such defense costs arise under principals of comparative fault from the Indemnified Party’s active negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct.

(e) This obligation to indemnify and defend, as set forth herein, is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this Section.

14. Insurance.

(a) As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement and without limiting Contractor's indemnification of the City, Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect at its own expense the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit “B” “Insurance” attached hereto and made a part hereof. Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates of insurance, executed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, along with copies of all required endorsements. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the City before any work commences. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney and Risk Manager as to form and content. Specifically, such insurance shall:
(1) be endorsed to protect City as an additional insured for commercial general and business auto liability; (2) provide City prior notice of cancellation; and (3) be primary with respect to City's insurance program. Contractor's insurance is not expected to respond to claims that may arise from the acts or omissions of the City.

(b) City reserves the right at any time during the term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required herein by giving Contractor ninety days advance written notice of such change. If such change should result in substantial additional cost of the Contractor, City agrees to negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City.

(c) All required insurance must be submitted and approved the City Attorney and Risk Manager prior to the inception of any operations by Contractor.

(d) The required coverage and limits are subject to availability on the open market at reasonable cost as determined by the City. Non availability or non affordability must be documented by a letter from Contractor's insurance broker or agency indicating a good faith effort to place the required insurance and showing as a minimum the names of the insurance carriers and the declinations or quotations received from each. Within the foregoing constraints, Contractor's failure to procure or maintain required insurance during the entire term of this Agreement shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement under which City may immediately suspend or terminate this Agreement or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance to protect City's interests and pay any and all premium in connection therewith and recover all monies so paid from Contractor.

EXHIBIT A
11 9

(e) By signing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 et seq., of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provision of that Code, and that it will comply with such provisions at all such times as they may apply during the performance of the work pursuant to this Contract. Unless otherwise agreed, a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City is required.

15. Independent Contractor. The parties agree that Contractor, its officers, employees and agents, if any, shall be independent contractors with regard to the providing of services under this Agreement, and that Contractor's employees or agents shall not be considered to be employees or agents of the City for any purpose and will not be entitled to any of the benefits City provides for its employees. City shall make no deductions for payroll taxes or Social Security from amounts due Contractor for work or services provided under this Agreement.

This Agreement shall not constitute, and it is not intended to constitute, either party as an employer, employee, agent, partner or legal representative of the other party for any purpose, or give either party any right to supervise or direct the functions of the other party. Except as specifically provided herein, neither party shall have authority to act for or obligate the other party in any way or to extend any representation on behalf of the other party. Each party agrees to perform under this Agreement solely as an independent contractor and neither party shall have any right, power, or authority, nor shall they represent themselves as having any authority to assume, create, or incur any expense, liability or obligation, express or implied, on behalf of the other party for any purpose. Each party agrees not to permit its employees or agents to do anything that might be construed or interpreted as acts of the other party.

16. Claims for Labor and Materials. Contractor shall promptly pay when due all amounts payable for labor and materials furnished in the performance of this Agreement, so as to prevent any lien or other claim under any provision of law from arising against any City property (including reports, documents, and other tangible matter produced by the Contractor hereunder), against the Contractor's rights to payments hereunder, or against the City, and shall pay all amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such labor.

17. Discounts. Contractor agrees to offer the City any discount terms that are offered to its best customers for the goods and services to be provided herein, and apply such discounts to payment made under this Agreement which meet the discount terms.

18. Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

19. Dispute Resolution. If any dispute arises between the parties as to proper interpretation or application of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet and confer in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter between themselves. If the dispute is not resolved by meeting and conferring, the matter shall be submitted for formal mediation to a mediator selected mutually by the parties. The expenses of such mediation shall be shared equally between the parties. If the dispute is not or cannot be resolved by

EXHIBIT A
12 10

mediation, the parties may mutually agree (but only as to those issues of the matter not resolved by mediation) to submit their dispute to arbitration. Before commencement of the arbitration, the parties may elect to have the arbitration proceed on an informal basis; however, if the parties are unable so to agree, then the arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. The decision of the arbitrator shall be binding, unless within thirty days after issuance of the arbitrator’s written decision, any party files an action in court. Venue and jurisdiction for any such action between the parties shall lie in the Superior Court for the County of Monterey.

20. Compliance with Laws.

(a) Each party's performance hereunder shall comply with all applicable laws of the United States of America, the State of California and the City including but not limited to laws regarding health and safety, labor and employment, wage and hours and licensing laws which affect employees. This Agreement shall be governed by, enforced and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Contractor must be in good standing and registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with California labor Code section 1725.5 and shall comply with new, amended or revised laws, regulations or procedures that apply to the performance of this Agreement.

(b) If the Project is a "public work," or prevailing wages are otherwise required, Contractor shall comply with all provision of California Labor Code section 1720 et seq., as applicable, and laws dealing with prevailing wages, apprentices and hours of work.

(c) Contractor represents that it has obtained and presently holds all permits and licenses necessary for performance hereunder, including a Business License required by the City's Business License Ordinance (Title 5 of the Marina Municipal Code) for which a business license tax is prescribed and assessed at the rate of two-tenths percent of gross receipts, in accordance with the provisions therein. For the term covered by this Agreement, the Contractor shall maintain or obtain as necessary, such permits and licenses and shall not allow them to lapse, be revoked or suspended.

21. Assignment or Transfer. This Agreement or any interest herein may not be assigned, hypothecated or transferred, either directly or by operation of law, without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

22. Notices. All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, sent by facsimile ("fax") or certified mail, postage prepaid with return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

To City: City Manager
City of Marina City Hall
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California 93933
Fax: (831) 384-9148

To Contractor: Henry Ruhnke
Wald, Ruhnke, and Dost Architects, LLP

EXHIBIT A
13 11

2340 Garden Road, Suite 100
Monterey, CA 93940
Fax (831) 649-3530

The parties my agree in writing to receive notice by email. Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile or, if mailed, three days after deposit in the custody of the U.S. Postal Service. A copy of any notice sent as provided herein shall also be delivered to the Project Administrator and Project Manager.

23. Amendments, Changes or Modifications. This Agreement is not subject to amendment, change or modification except by a writing signed by the authorized representatives of City and Contractor.

24. Force Majeure. Notwithstanding any other provisions hereof, neither Contractor nor City shall be held responsible or liable for failure to meet their respective obligations under this Agreement if such failure shall be due to causes beyond Contractor's or the City's control except that an economic downturn of any type shall not be a justifiable cause for the failure to meet their respective obligations under this Agreement. Such causes include but are not limited to: strike, fire, flood, civil disorder, act of God or of the public enemy, act of the federal government, or any unit of state of local government in either sovereign or contractual capacity, epidemic, quarantine restriction, or delay in transportation to the extent that they are not caused by the party's willful or negligent acts or omissions, and to the extent that they are beyond the party's reasonable control.

25. Attorney's Fees. In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party reasonable expenses, attorney's fees and costs.

26. Successors and Assigns. All of the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall apply to and bind the respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to affect the limitation on assignment

27. Authority to Enter Agreement. Contractor has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective party.

28. Waiver. A waiver of a default of any term of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding default or as a waiver of the provision itself. A party's performance after the other party's default shall not be construed as a waiver of that default.

29. Severability. Should any portion of this Agreement be determined to be void or unenforceable, such shall be severed from the whole and the Agreement will continue as modified.

30. Construction, References, Captions. Since the parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against

EXHIBIT A
14 12

any party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. The captions of the various sections are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement.

31. Advice of Counsel. The parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms and conditions of this Agreement, and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Agreement is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the parties hereto. This Agreement shall not be construed in favor or against either party by reason of the extent to which each party participated in the drafting of this Agreement.

32. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

33. Time. Time is of the essence in this contract.

34. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the matters as set forth in this Agreement, and no other agreement, statement or promise made by or to any party or by or to any employee, officer or agent of any party, which is not contained in this Agreement shall be binding or valid.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Contractor and the City by their duly authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement, on the date first set forth above, at Marina, California.

CITY OF MARINA CONTRACTOR

By: By:

Name: Name: ___ ____________ Its: Its: ___________________ Date: _______________________ Date: ___________________

Attest: (Pursuant to Reso: 20 - _____)

By:

City Clerk

Approved as to form:

By:

City Attorney

EXHIBIT A
15 INSERT EXHIBIT A

Section 1 (a)

- SCOPE OF WORK -

[Include Work Schedule if required.]

A-1

EXHIBIT A
16 EXHIBIT B - INSURANCE

Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees.

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE

Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Contractor has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non-owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (Not required if Contractor provides written verification it has no employees)

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriates to Contractor’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.

If Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

Additional Insured Status
City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used).

EXHIBIT A
17 Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies.

Umbrella or Excess Policy
Contractor may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until Contractor’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.

Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. The CGL and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subject to a self-insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 unless approved in writing by City.

Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Contractor or subcontractor who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City may deduct from any amounts otherwise due Contractor to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self-insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the City. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.

EXHIBIT A
18 Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.

Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:

1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims- made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.

Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL and any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

Subcontractors
Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.

Duration of Coverage
CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of five (5) years for Completed Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

1848503.1

EXHIBIT A
19 May 7, 2025
Mr. Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director,
City of Marina Public Works Department
Marina, CA 93933
Email: [email protected]
Re: Marina Fire Department #2, New Addition
3260 Imjin Rd (at Marina Airport),
Marina, CA 93933
WRD Project Number: 25075.0
Dear Mr. Hernadez,
Thank you for allowing Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP (WR D) the opportunity to provide architectural and design services for the above referenced property. This proposal and the attached Terms and Conditions set forth our understanding of the nature and scope of the services to be performed and the fees we will charge for this service, as well as outline the responsibilities of the parties involved to ensure that WRD services are performed under mutually agreeable objectives.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The Marina Fire Department facility is be enlarged for more vehicle and office space. The existing vehicle single bay is to be lengthened a minim of 43 feet.

Additional office space and a new second restroom is needed. Based on preliminary discussions at the site on 4/23/25, the new addition can be of a metal building construction type, immediately adjacent to the existing vehicle bay, matching its width. The new addition can have a higher roof allowing clerestory windows in the higher connecting wall. The main building can have lower “lean to” spaces (similar to the existing vehicle bay) to provide new office and restroom space. Modifications to the existing lean-to spaces for conversion for the new restroom is also possible. The total area of the vehicle bay will be approximately 1200 square feet and the new lower areas approximately 200 square feet. No work is needed in the existing main building away from the vehicle bay and its adjacent spaces.

SCOPE OF SERVICES

1. As-Built Drawings:
- Site visit for measuring : for developing ‘as-built’ drawings for the portion of the building that will be associated with the new addtion.

2. Schematic Design:
- Drawings: Develop schematic design level drawings of existing building and proposed new addition consisting of Architectural Site Plan, Floor Plan and Exterior Elevations.
2340 Garden Road
Suite 100
Monterey, CA
93940-5347
T: (831) 649-4642
F: (831) 649-3530
www.wrdarch.com

EXHIBIT B
20 25075.0
MFD Staton #2
5/7/25

Page 2 of 7 ends

3. Design Development Documents:

- Drawings and Specifications : Develop design development level drawings of existing building and proposed new addition consisting of Architectural, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Drawings with Outline Specifications.

3. Construction Documents for permit submittal:

- Drawings: Develop construction document level drawings of existing building and proposed new addition consisting of Architectural, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Drawings with Full Specifications.

Drawings will be suitable for permit submittal . Drawings and Specifications will be suitable for bidding purposes.

4. Bidding & Construction Support:

- Support:

Assist with assemblage of Project M anual for bidding. Review and respond to Bidder RFC’s. Assi st with contractor selection as needed.

Review project submittals and respond to RFI ’s and issue clarifications as needed during construction . Assist with project c loseout including punch list walks and review of O&M’s and for final occupancy.

ASSUMPTIONS

1. Owner will provide a Topographic Survey of the area for the new addition including location of existing utilities.

2. Owner will provide a Geotechical Report.

3. Project will be Design, Bid, Build project delivery. Bi dding will be a competitive Public Bid to B Licensed Prime Bidders.

4. Owner will provide “front end ” bidding docum ents, WRD will provide supporting technical specifications.

5. The p roject will not create and/or replac e 2500 sf or more impervious surfaces over the entire project site and is therefore exempted and not regulated under a Stormwater permit. New roof drainage is straightforward for conveyance and surface flow to existing vegetated area s and an WRD internally created Civil Grading and Grading plan indicating such drainage and minor hardscape modifications will be included in the design for the project. Standard construction phase erosion control requirements (BMP’s) will also be included in the WRD created Civil Drawings.

EXHIBIT B
21 25075.0
MFD Staton #2
5/7/25

Page 3 of 7 ends

6. Based on the scope of work , WRD recommends this addition be constructed as a cost-effective metal building system erected by a metal building contractor bidding t he project . WRD will provide specifications for the metal building design including a recommended steel frame syste m, exterior claddings, interior finishes and a fully engineered recommended foundation design. The structural drawings and structural calculations related to the metal building above grade will be provided by the bidder and as such will be listed as a deferred submittal on the permit set.

FEE

The above services can be provided for the following fee.

WRD Architectural / Civil Design and
Construction Support - Fixed Fee $78,500

WRD Structural Consultant Design and
Construction Support - Fixed Fee $9,200

WRD Plumbing / Mechanical Consultant Design and
Construction Support - Fixed Fee $21,275

WRD Electrical Consultant Design and
Construction Support - Fixed Fee (Budget) $22,500

Total $131,475

EXCLUDED ITEMS

Services other than identified above
Planning department approvals
Civil Engineering if required
Environmental studies
Hazardous material testing
California Access Specialist (CASp) survey
3-D renderings
Stormwater Permit Design (assumed not required)
SWPPP preparation and monitoring (assumed not required) Government agency fees
Reproductions
Reimbursable expenses

EXHIBIT B
22 25075.0
MFD Staton #2
5/7/25

Page 4 of 7 ends

AGREEMENT TERMS

The following Terms and Conditions shall be incorporated into the architectural fee proposal and become effective upon proceeding with the Scope of Work.

If you have any questions, please contact Lou Bartlett at 831-649-4642.

Sincerely, Approved by:

Henry Ruhnke, Principal _______________________________ California Architects License C21266 Signature
Wald, Runke & Dost Architects, LLP
________________________________
Print Name

________________________________
Date

Attachments: Terms and Conditions, Fee Schedule, Exhibit A

EXHIBIT B
23 25075.0
MFD Staton #2
5/7/25

Page 5 of 7 ends

Effective January 1, 2025

Exhibit A
Fee Schedule

Office Personnel Hourly Rates:

Principals $275 - 295
Project Architects/Managers $210 - 235
Construction Managers $210 - 235
Job Captains $175 - 190
Interior Designers $175 - 210
CAD Technicians $160 - 170
Administrative Assistants $110 - 125

Specialty Services Hourly Rates:

Expert Witness $475
Reimbursable Expenses:

Travel
Mileage Current Federal Rate
+15%
In House Charges
B&W prints/copies - Letter/Legal $ 0.30 per page
B&W prints/copies - Ledger $ 0.75 per page
Color prints/copies - Letter/Legal $ 0.90 each
Color prints/copies - Ledger $ 1.75 each
Fax Charges $ 0.75 per page
Comb Binding /Binders $ 8.00 each
Printing & Plotting
Bond 24” X 36” $ 5.50 per sheet
Bond 30” X 42” $ 6.50 per sheet
Color 24” X 36” $15.00 per sheet
Color 30” X 42” $18.00 per sheet
Scanning
8½” X 11” - Letter/Legal $ 0.75 per sheet
11” X 17” - Ledger $ 1.00 per sheet
24” x 36” $10.00 per sheet
30” x 42” $15.00 per sheet

Other Charges

Consultant charges are billed at cost, plus fifteen (15%) percent.

Outside reproduction charges, government agency fees, postage, phone charges, travel, and related reimbursable expenses are billed at actual face value of the invoice, plus fifteen (15%) percent.

Staff travel time is billed at the office personnel hourly rates.

Fees subject to change

EXHIBIT B
24 25075.0
MFD Staton #2
5/7/25

Page 6 of 7 ends

WALD, RUHNKE & DOST ARCHITECTS, LLP TERMS AND CONDITIONS

The following Terms and Conditions shall be incorporated into Wald, Ruhnke & Dost Architects, LLP’s (“WR&D”) Fee Proposal and become effective upon proceeding with the Scope of Work:

1. WR&D is an independent contractor and shall not be liable for the acts of Client or its agents in performing Work.

2. WR&D’s services and work product for the Project are intended for the sole benefit of Client and are not intended to create any third-party rights or benefits.

3. The services shall be performed in a manner consistent with that level of skill ordinarily exercised by other professional Architects for similar projects under similar circumstances. No other representations to Client, express or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended in this Agreement or WR&D’s Work Product, opinion, or otherwise. Client understands and acknowledges that each project is different, and there will always be revisions and clarifications in plans and specifications as a project proceeds which may have cost and schedule impacts.

4. Neither party may assign any portion of this Agreement or any rights hereunder without the written consent of the other.

5. All tracings, calculations, and other original documents produced by WR&D for the Project (“WR&D’s Work Product”) are instruments of services and shall remain the property of WR&D, except where by law or governmental requirement or prior agreement, all or some portion of WR&D’s Work Product becomes property of Client. Upon payment of WR&D’s fees and costs as provided in this Agreement, Client shall receive the limited right to use WR&D’s Work Product solely for the specific Project covered by this Agreement.

6. In the event Client elects to reduce WR&D’s scope of services, Client hereby agrees to release, hold harmless, defend, and indemnify WR&D from any and all claims, damages, losses, or costs associated with or arising out of such reduction in services.

7. Client and WR&D agree that inspection, maintenance, and normal repair are the exclusive obligations of the owner of a structure. WR&D shall have no responsibility for the inspection, maintenance, and normal repair of any portion of the Project, or for damages arising out of the failure to inspect, maintain, or repair the Project.

8. If Client fails to pay due amounts within fifty (50) calendar days of the date of the invoice, WR&D may, at any time and without waiving any other claim against Client and without incurring any liability whatsoever to Client or others, suspend or terminate this Agreement. Service charges of 1.5% per month shall accrue on all unpaid invoice amounts sixty (60) days after date of invoice unless prior arrangements have been made.

9. If Client objects to any portion of an invoice, Client shall notify WR&D in writing within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of such invoice. Client shall identify the specific cause of the disagreement and shall pay when due that portion of the invoice not in dispute. Service charges of 1.5% per month (18% annum) shall be paid by Client on all disputed invoiced amounts resolved in WR&D’s favor and unpaid for more than sixty (60) calendar days after date of submission. Client may not backcharge or withhold payment from WR&D as an offset to damages or construction costs except to the extent the fees at issue were deficient. Payment is due regardless of suspension or termination of the Agreement by either party.

10. In the event legal action is necessary to enforce the payment provisions of this Agreement, WR&D shall be entitled to collect from Client, in addition to any judgment or settlement sums due, all attorneys’ fees, Court costs up to a maximum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) and expenses incurred by WR&D in connection therewith and, in addition, the reasonable value of WR&D’s time and expenses spent in connection with such action, computed at WR&D’s prevailing fee schedule and expense policies. All such claims shall be adjudicated in the County of Monterey, State of California.

11. Client recognizes that contractor and subcontractors will be in control of the Project site and exclusively responsible for construction means, methods, schedule, and jobsite safety. Client shall require all contractors and subcontractors to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Client and WR&D from any and all claims, losses, suits, damages, and liabilities, including attorneys’ fees and costs, arising in any way from such contractors’ or subcontractors’ services or work product, except to the extent caused by WR&D’s sole negligence or willful misconduct. In support of this obligation, Client shall require all contractors and subcontractors to include Client and WR&D as additional insureds under its insurance policies applicable to the Project. WR&D shall not be

EXHIBIT B
25 25075.0
MFD Staton #2
5/7/25

Page 7 of 7 ends

responsible for damages, losses, costs, or claims caused by contractors or subcontractors, except to the extent caused by WR&D’s sole negligence.

12. Where Client has directly retained other consultants, Client agrees that it shall not seek to hold WR&D responsible for errors, omissions, or other wrongful acts of such other consultants except to the extent of WR&D's proportionate responsibility for such claims, damages, or losses, or to the extent subconsultants’ insurance and other resources are inadequate to respond to the claim. Client shall also require all such consultants to appropriate professional and general liability insurance.

13. WR&D does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual costs will not vary from cost opinions, evaluations or studies prepared by WR&D.

14. When applicable per the Scope of Work, Construction Support services performed by WR&D shall be performed solely for the purpose of assisting in quality control and general conformance with contract drawing and specifications. By providing such services, WR&D does not guarantee contractor’s performance. Such services are not intended to create rights of or benefits to the contractor.

15. WR&D shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal or disposal of, or exposure of persons to hazardous materials in any form at the Project site including, but not limited to, asbestos, asbestos products, PCBs or other toxic substances.

16. WR&D agrees to put forth its professional efforts to perform its services in a manner consistent with the agreed - upon schedule. WR&D is not responsible for delays in Client’s planning or construction schedules, failure of Client to furnish timely information or documents, or to approve or disapprove WR&D work promptly, by reason of delay or faulty performance by Client, other contractors or governmental agencies, or any other causes beyond WR&D’s reasonable control.

17. In the event of suspension of work on the Project, in excess of fifty (50) days, Client will be subject to a remobilization fee to reengage team members on the Project. This remobilization fee will be equal to 20% of the remaining fee on the contract.

18. Either WR&D or Client may terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon giving the other party ten (10) calendar days' prior written notice. Upon such termination, WR&D shall submit a request for payment for all services rendered and all costs incurred up to the date of termination. Client shall, within ten (10) days of receiving WR&D’s request for payment, pay WR&D’s unpaid fees and costs in accordance with the compensation provisions of the Agreement.

19. Client shall indemnify, defend and hold WR&D harmless from all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising from the Project, except to the extent such claim, damage, loss or expense is caused by the negligent act, omission, and/or strict liability of WR&D, anyone directly or indirectly employed by WR&D, or anyone for whose acts WR&D is liable.

20. In recognition of the relative risks, rewards and benefits of the Project to both Client and WR&D, the risks have been allocated such that Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to limit the liability of WR&D, its employees and consultants, to Client and all others for any and all injuries, claims, losses, expenses, damages or claim expenses, including attorneys’ fees and costs and expert witness fees and costs, arising out of this Agreement or the Project so that the total aggregate liability of WR&D to Client and all others shall not exceed the lesser of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) or the fee received to a maximum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000). It is intended that this limitation will apply to any and all liability or cause of action however alleged or arising, unless otherwise prohibited by law. Such causes include, but are not limited to, WR&D’s negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability, breach of contract, or breach of warranty.

21. In no event shall WR&D be liable for consequential damages including, without limitation, loss of use or loss of profits incurred by Client, regardless of whether such claim is based upon alleged breach of contract, willful misconduct or negligent act or omission, whether professional or nonprofessional.

22. This Agreement contains all terms and conditions agreed on by the parties hereto, and no other agreements, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. No change, modification, or amendment to this Agreement will be valid unless agreed to by both of the parties hereto in writing.

23. Any provision or part of this Agreement held to be void or unenforceable under any law shall be deemed stricken and all remaining provisions shall continue to be binding upon the parties.

Architects are licensed and regulated by the California Architects Board located at 2420 Del Paso Road, Suite 105, Sacramento, CA 95834.

EXHIBIT B
26 June 19, 2025 Item No. 11a

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 1, 2025

CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER OPENING PUBLIC HEARING, TAKING

ANY TESTIMONY FROM PUBLIC, AND CONSIDER ADOPTING
RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-__, FORMING THE CYPRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND
LEVYING THE ASSESSMENT FOR FY 2025-26 IN CONNECTION WITH

THE OVERLAY DISTRICT AND THE EXISTING CYPRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT , AND

CERTIFYING CITY OF MARINA COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW
(PROPOSITION 218) WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSESSMENT FOR THE

EXISTING CYPRESS COVE II LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 202 5-2026; OR, IN THE

ALTERNATIVE, ADOPTING A RESOLUTION DECLARING ITS

INTENTION TO DISSOLVE THE EXISTING CYPRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Opening public hearing, taking any testimony from the public, and;

2. Adopting Resolution No. 2025-____ (Attachment #1 hereto), forming the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Overlay Assessment District (“Overlay Assessment District”) and levying the assessment for FY 2025-26 in connection with that District and the existing Cypress Cove II Maintenance Assessment District (“existing Assessment District”); and

3. Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -__ (Attachment #2 hereto) c ertifying City of Marina compliance with State law (Proposition 218) with respect to FY 2025-2026 assessments for the existing Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts;

or, in the alternative,

4. Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -_____ (Attachment # 3 hereto), declaring its intention to dissolve the landscape maintenance district known as Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance District.

BACKGROUND:

At the regular meeting of June 16, 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution 1987 -23, ordering the formation of the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment District pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 22594 and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 to maintain certain improvements required of new development as a condition of the Cypress Cove II subdivision approvals.
1 The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires an annual update report to be prepared, which includes the costs to maintain the improvements of the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment District and what the proposed assessments will be to provide for that maintenance.

The first step in the annual update process is for the City Council to initiate the process by adopting a resolution ordering the City Engineer to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for the District. At the regular meeting of February 19, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025 -12, ordering the City Engineer to prepare and to file a report related to maintenance of the existing Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The report has been included as “Exhibit A”.

After initiation of the update process and preparation of the update report, the next step in the process is for the City Council to adopt a resolution of intention to set a Public Hearing. At the regular meeting of May 6, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025 -30, receiving the Fiscal Year 2025 -26 Engineer's Report for the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment District and Overlay Assessment District , approving, preliminarily, the Engineer’s Report as filed, declaring its intention t o order the formation of the Overlay Assessment District and to levy an assessment in Fiscal Year 2025-26 in each district (the existing Assessment District and the Overlay Assessment District) , and setting a public hearing and assessment ballot proceeding for July 1, 2025 or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. Public hearing notices and assessment ballots were mailed to all affected property owners on May 15, 2025.

ANALYSIS:

For Fiscal Year 2025/26, an increase of 186%, from $ 180.78 to $ 517.60, is proposed to the assessment rate. This rate will enable the existing Assessment District to fully fund its tree maintenance expenses and reestablish a reasonable operating reserve for unforeseen costs.

Because the existing assessment predates Proposition 218 and therefore is “grandfathered” with respect to Proposition 218’s requirements, past legal counsel has advised that the $ 336.82 per parcel increase in the assessment be assessed through a separate “overlay” district (which would be subject to Proposition 218) rather than as an increase to the assessment levied in connection with the existing Assessment District. If approved, this structure would result in each homeowner paying a maximum total of $517.60 per year; $180.78 to the existing district and $ 336.82 to the new district. The property-owner approval requirement for the overlay structure is the same as it would be for an increase to the existing assessment.

As required by Proposition 218, i n order to form the Overlay Assessment District and levy the overlay assessment , the City Council must hold a public hearing on the proposed overlay assessment. After the Council has heard any written and oral testimony that members of the pubic wish to present, staff will tabulate the assessment ballots returned to the City. If the number of ballots returned in support of the overly assessment is no less than the number of ballots returned in opposition to the assessment, then the City Council may proceed to form the Overlay Assessment District and levy the overlay assessment for Fiscal Year 2025-26 at $336.82 per parcel, or at any lower rate (Resolution Attachment #1). Because the proposed assessment rate is the same for every parcel, every ballot will have the same weight.

Except for the Constitutionally -limited 1% ad valorem tax, the Monterey County Auditor - Controller will not place taxes, assessments, fees or charges on the rolls unless the City Council certifies by resolution that the City is in compliance with Proposition 218, the 1996 “Right to Vote on Taxes Act” with respect to each such tax, assessment, fee and charge. Certification resolution(s) must contain hold harmless and indemnification provisions for administrative expenses of the County associated with collection of the City's taxes, assessments, fees and charges placed on the 2 rolls. These certifications, along with copies of the resolutions setting the tax, assessment fee and/or charge rates and certain other documentation, must be submitted to the County no later than August 1, 2025.

Should the ballot not approve the overlay assessment, the City will move to dissolve the existing Assessment District and hold a separate Public Hearing to finalize the dissolution (Resolution Attachment #3). Homeowners of properties with yards facing Abdy Way, Beach Road and Dolphin Circle will be responsible for the maintenance areas previously within the District while the City will take responsibility for maintenance areas within the City’s right-of-way.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Should the City Council approve this request, the anticipated revenue for the FY 2025-26 assessment levy is $ 517.60 ($180.78 for the existing Assessment District and $ 336.82 for the Overlay Assessment District) for the purpose of the landscape maintenance districts.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council’s approval.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Edrie Delos Santos, PE
Engineering Division
Public Works Department

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

3 (ATTACHMENT #1)
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA
CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT, FORMING THE CYPRESS

COVE II LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OVERLAY ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT, AND LEVYING THE ASSESSMENT FOR FY 2025-26 IN

CONNECTION WITH THE OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND

THE CYPRESS COVE II LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT

DISTRICT

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of June 16, 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution 1987 - 23, ordering the formation of the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment District pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 22594 and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 to maintain certain improvements required of new development as a condition of the subdivision approvals; and

WHEREAS, the Interim City Engineer, on the direction of the City Council, has filed with the City Clerk the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment and Overlay Assessment District Engineer’s R eport (the “Report”) with respect to the Fiscal Year 20 25-26 levy of the assessment in connection with the existing Assessment District and the proposed Overlay Assessment District; and

WHEREAS, the existing annual assessment rate of $108.78 per parcel is insufficient to fully fund the activities of the Assessment District; and

WHEREAS, the Report also describes the formation of the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Overlay Assessment District (the “Overlay Assessment District”) and the Fiscal Year 2025-26 levy of an assessment in connection with the Overlay Assessment District; and

WHEREAS, the Overlay Assessment District has identical boundaries to the Assessment District, and has been designed to levy an additional $336.82 per parcel annual assessment that will fill the funding shortfall in the existing assessment for tree maintenance; and

WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-30 (the “Resolution of Intention”), which approved, preliminarily, the Report and declared the Council’s intention to form the Overlay Assessment District and to levy assessments in connection with the Assessment District and the Overlay Assessment District for fiscal year 2025-26 as described in the Report; and;

WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention set a public hearing on these matters for July 1, 2025; and

WHEREAS, notices of the public hearing, along with assessment ballots, were mailed to each affected property owner as required by law and a full and fair public hearing was held at the appointed time and place; and

WHEREAS, the ballots properly submitted in opposition to the assessment in the Overlay Assessment District do not outnumber the ballots properly submitted in support of that assessment; and

4 WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to proceed with the formation of the Overlay Assessment District and the levy of assessments in connection with the Assessment District and the Overlay Assessment District.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina that:

1. The Report, as filed, is hereby finally approved.

2. The City Council forms the Overlay Assessment District as set forth in the Report.

3. The City Council confirms the diagram and assessment set forth in the Report for the existing Assessment District and for the Overlay Assessment District.

4. The levy and colle ction of the Fiscal Year 20 25-26 assessment in connection with the existing Assessment District is ordered at the rate of $180.78 per parcel, as set forth in the Report.

5. The levy and colle ction of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessment in connection with the Overlay Assessment District is ordered at the rate of $336.82 per parcel, as set forth in the Report.

6. The City Council determines that a majority protest against levy of the assessment in connection with the Overlay Assessment District the increase to the assessment does not exist, and that said assessment satisfies all requirements of Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution.

7. The City Council determines that the assessment levied in connection with the existing Assessment District predates the effective date of Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution and is exempt from the requirements of that section.

8. It is the intention of the City Council that any monetary advance made by the City during any fiscal year to cover a deficit in the improvement fund of the Existing Assessment District shall be repaid from the next annual assessments levied and collected w ithin the Existing and Overlay Assessment Districts.

9. The provisions of this resolution are severable and if any one provision is determined to be impermissible then the remainder of the resolution shall remain in full force and effect.

10. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of said diagram and assessments with the Monterey County Auditor prior to August 1, 20 25 and staff is directed to take any actions necessary to cause the collection of the assessment s on the property tax roll.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

___________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
5 (ATTACHMENT #2)
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MARINA CERTIFYING

COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW WITH RESPECT TO
LEVYING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

WHEREAS, the City of Marina requests that the Monterey County Auditor -Controller enter the special assessment identified in Exhibit “A” on the property tax roll for collection and distribution by the Monterey County Treasurer-Tax Collector commencing with the property tax bills for fiscal year 2025-26 (“EXHIBIT A”).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina as follows:

1. The City hereby certifies that it has, without limitation, complied with all legal procedures and requirements necessary for the levying and imposition of the general or special taxes and assessments identified in EXHIBIT A regardless of whether those procedures and requirements are set forth in the Constitution of the State of California, in State statutes, or in the applicable decisional law of the State of California.

2. The City further certifies that, except for the sole negligence or misconduct of the County of Monterey, its officers, employees and agents, the City shall be solely liable and responsible for defending, at its sole expense, cost and risk, each and every a ction, suit or other proceeding brought against the County of Monterey, its officers, employees and agents for every claim, demand or challenge to the levying or imposition of the general or special taxes and assessments identified in EXHIBIT A and that th e City shall pay or satisfy any judgment rendered against the County of Monterey, its officers, employees and agents on every such action, suit, or other proceeding, including all claims for refunds and interest thereon, legal fees, court costs and adminis trative expenses of the County of Monterey to correct the tax rolls.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Marina City Council at a regular meeting duly held on the 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

__________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

6 EXHIBIT A

ATTACHMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 2025-__ OF THE CITY OF MARINA,

COUNTY OF MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH

STATE LAW WITH RESPECT TO THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

PER-PARCEL ASSESSMENTS:

Assessment District – Operations:

Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment District $180.78

Overlay Assessment District – Operations:

Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment Overlay District $336.82

7 (ATTACHMENT #3)
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO DISSOLVE THE CYPRESS COVE

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of June 16, 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution 1987 -23, ordering the formation of the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment District pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 22594 and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 to maintain certain improvements required of new development as a condition of the subdivision approvals, and;

WHEREAS, the current maximum assessment for the Assessment District was set in 200 4 and is not sufficient to fully fund the annual expenses of the Assessment District, and;

WHEREAS, to meet this shortfall, the Assessment District has been using its reserve funds, which are nearly depleted and cannot sustain the maintenance of the 68 trees in the District, and;

WHEREAS, by prior resolution, the City Council declared its intent to levy the assessment for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and proposed forming and Overlay Assessment District to levy an increased rate for the assessment in the form of a new overlay assessment; and

WHEREAS, on July 1, 2025, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on the Fiscal Year 2025-26 levy; and

WHEREAS, at the July 1, 2025 public hearing, it was determined that the property owners, in an assessment ballot proceeding, had rejected the proposed overlay assessment; and

WHEREAS, due to the lack of funding to maintain the landscape maintenance functions and benefits of the Assessment District the City Council now must dissolve the District; and

WHEREAS, to dissolve the District, the City Council must first declare its intention to dissolve the Assessment District and hold a public hearing at which it finally dissolves the district.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina, as follows:

1. The City Council declares its intention to dissolve the Assessment District.

2. A public hearing on the dissolution of the Assessment District is scheduled for August 6, 2025 at 6:30 P.M. or as soon thereaf ter as the matter may be heard, in the City Council Chambers located at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, City of Marina, California.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, on the 1st day of July 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

__________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

__________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
8 CI

TY OF MARINA

MONTEREY COUNTY

CALIFORNIA

CY PRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
AND

OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ENGINEER'S REPORT
FY 2025-2026
C
ouncil Members:

B. DELGADO, MAYOR
B. MCCARTHY L. VISSCHER
K. BI
ALA J. MCADAMS
LAYNE LONG City Manager
ANITA SHEPHERD-SHARP Deputy City Clerk
RENÉ ORTEGA City Attorney
ISMAEL HERNANDEZ Public Works Director
Prepared By
City of Marina
Public Works Department

EXHIBIT A
9 CYPRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
&

CYPRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OVERLAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026

This report concerns the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (“Original Assessment District”) and the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Overlay Assessment District (“Overlay Assessment District”), collectively “the Districts”.

The Districts have identical boundaries, and each consist of the Cypress Cove II Subdivision located in the westerly portion of the City of Marina just east of the Highway I and Reservation Road interchange. The subdivision is bounded on three sides by Abdy Way, Cardoza Avenue, and Beach Road, contains 110 lots, a percolation pond parcel (Parcel B), and an emergency access road (Parcel C).

The subdivision consists of 110 single family homes complete with underground utilities, water and wastewater facilities, street and drainage improvements, and landscaping. The Districts have been formed for the purpose of maintaining the exterior boundary landscaping and retaining walls, installed and paid for by the developer.

This report has been prepared pursuant to Sections 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).

The improvements to be maintained which are the subject of this report, are briefly described as follows:

All exterior landscaping elements located adjacent to the subdivision boundaries along Abdy Way, Cardoza Avenue, and Beach Road and outside the chain link fence on Parcel B are considered as the improvements included in the Assessment District.

Landscaping elements consist of hydroseeded areas, groundcover, shrubs, trees, irrigation pipelines, controllers, valves, sprinklers, masonry retaining walls, and electrical service. Plans and specifications showing these existing improvements which are to be maintained are on file in the City of Marina Public Works Division.

The Original Assessment District was formed in 1987 and the rate of the assessment in connection with the Original Assessment District has not been increased since 2004. Therefore, the Original Assessment District is “grandfathered” with respect to the requirements of Proposition 218 (Articles XIII C and XIII D of the California Constitution).

The Overlay Assessment District is designed to finance the maintenance of the trees in the landscaping areas noted in the description above. The cost estimate contained in this report is a determination of the cost of the special benefit to each parcel within the Overlay Assessment District from the operation, maintenance and servicing of the landscaping that provides aesthetic benefits to the adjacent and nearby parcels.

EXHIBIT A
10 Page Two
Engineer's Report
Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance Assessment District

There is no general benefit from the facilities because the assessed parcels constitute all of the residential parcels within the geographically distinct subdivision that constitutes the Overlay Assessment District. It is unlikely that persons not associated with assessed parcels will make use of the facilities because the Overlay Assessment District is an isolated residential subdivision which has no pass-through traffic. Parcels outside of the Overlay Assessment District are in a different geographically distinct area and served by different facilities. Furthermore, the landscaping is geographically disbursed within the District and each assessed parcel has essentially equal proximity to (and special benefit from) improvements regardless of the parcel’s location within the Overlay Assessment District.

All residential parcels in the Overlay Assessment District receive equal special benefits from the improvements. The only non-residential parcels in the Overlay Assessment District are a percolation pond and a park. These parcels do not receive special benefit from the improvements because they are themselves public landscaped areas of a nature similar to the landscaping funded by the Overlay Assessment District.

This report includes the following attached exhibits:

EXHIBIT A - An assessment diagram and boundary map showing all of the parcels of the real property within the Assessment District. The diagram is keyed to Exhibit C by the separate "Assessment Number".

EXHIBIT B - Spreadsheet showing estimated costs for FY 2024-2025 and estimated costs for FY 2025-2026 and FY 2026-2027.

EXHIBIT C - An assessment roll showing the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel of real property within this Assessment District. In addition to the Assessor's Parcel Number each parcel has been assigned a separate "Assessment Number" which corresponds to that parcels lot number.

EXHIBIT D - Method of determination of assessment spread.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________
Nourdin Khayata, PE
Interim City Engineer

April 2024

April 2025

EXHIBIT A
11 Abdy Way
Cove Way
Seal Ct
Cardoza Ave
Dolphin Cir
Coral Way
Pebble Pl
Sandpiper Way
Juniper Ct
Dolphin Cir
112
001
056
066 065
059
030
111
015
058
024
110
023
048
007 016
006
046047057
017
045
033
094
073
011
032
102
009
084
074
004
034
010
013014
012
031
035
008
002
093
003
005
060
071
038
061
044
036
051072
020
037
055
062
019018
103
021022
054
068
070
028
067
049
069
089 083
041
043
050
042
079
040
086
090
085
087
039
109
025026
053
076
100
064
092
027
063
095096
106
101
088
078
108
098099
104
107
091
077
052
097
105
075
081
029
082
080
Cypress Cove II
Landscape Maintenance District
0 100 200
Feet
±
¬«1
Del Monte Blvd California Ave
Crescent Ave
Hillcrest Ave
Patton Parkway
Reindollar Ave
Carmel Ave
De Forest Rd
Cardoza Ave
Marina Dr
Reservation Rd
Abdy Way
Paddon Pl
Bayer Dr
±
Vicinity Map
Boundary and Landscaped Area Map
Legend
Cypress Cove II
Boundary
Landscaped Area

2.00 Acres
Parcels
Percolation Lot
Roads
Date: April 15th, 2009
Notes: The City of Marina assume no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map is subject to updates/modifications and may not be complete or appropriate for all purposes. The City of Marina and Monterey County GIS should be queried for the most current information. Parcel data is of mapping grade only and does not represent reliable locations or legal boundaries.

Sources: Monterey County GIS, City of Marina CDD
Map Projection: California State Plane Z one IV, NAD 83 (Feet)

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT A
12 Estimates Estimates Estimates
Summary FY 2024-2025 FY 2025-2026 FY 2026-2027
Existing District Beginning Cash Balance, July 1st 3,775$ 393$ 12,326$ (a)Existing Assessment Revenues (110 Parcels) 19,886$ 19,886$ 19,886$ Overlay District Beginning Cash Balance, July 1st -$ -$ -$ (a)Overlay District Assessment Revenues (110 Parcels) -$ 37,050$ 37,050$ Total Available Funds 23,661$ 57,330$ 69,263$ Expenditures
Contractor Services
(b) Landscape Maintenance Contract 6 ,439$ 6,632$ 6,831$ Utilities 644$ 644$ 644$ Large Tree Trimming -$ 31,120$ 37,050$ Extraordinary Maintenance 9,684$ -$ -$ Tree/Plant Replacement
Administrative Services
Supervision -$ -$ -$
Administration (Incl. Engineers Report) 3,500$ 4,000$ 4,000$ Cost Allocation Plan Charges 2,750$ 2,750$ 2,750$ Legal Advertising 250$ 250$ 250$ Total Expenditures 23,267$ 45,396$ 51,525$ (c)Net Change in Fund Balance ( 3,381)$ 11,933$ 17,737$ (d)Ending Fund Balance, June 30th 393$ 12,326$ 30,064$ (d) End Fund Balance equals the Net Change in Fund Balance plus the Beginning Cash Balance of that Fiscal Year. The FY 25/26 end fund balance will carry over to help finance the continuous work scheduled through the next 5-years. (c) Net Change in Fund Balance equals the Total Expenditures subtracted from Total Assessment Revenue for that Fiscal Year. (b) Maintenance Costs are shown as increasing per fiscal year by an estimated Consumer Cost Index (CPI) of 3% as allowed by the Contract Specifications.
(a) The current District's Maximum Assessment per Prop 218 is $180.78 per parcel. The proposed assessment amount for FY 25/26 is $187.78 (Original District) + $336.82 (Overlay District).

CYPRESS COVE II LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

EXHIBIT B

EXHIBIT A
13 EXHIBIT C

CYPRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
Diagram &
Assessment No.

Assessor's
Parcel Number
Original
District
Assessment
Overlay District
Assessment
1 033-076-001 180.78$ 336.82$
2 033-076-002 180.78$ 336.82$
3 033-076-003 180.78$ 336.82$
4 033-076-004 180.78$ 336.82$
5 033-076-005 180.78$ 336.82$
6 033-076-006 180.78$ 336.82$
7 033-076-007 180.78$ 336.82$
8 033-076-008 180.78$ 336.82$
9 033-076-009 180.78$ 336.82$
10 033-076-010 180.78$ 336.82$
11 033-076-011 180.78$ 336.82$
12 033-076-012 180.78$ 336.82$
13 033-076-013 180.78$ 336.82$
14 033-076-014 180.78$ 336.82$
15 033-076-015 180.78$ 336.82$
16 033-076-016 180.78$ 336.82$
17 033-076-017 180.78$ 336.82$
18 033-076-018 180.78$ 336.82$
19 033-076-019 180.78$ 336.82$
20 033-076-020 180.78$ 336.82$
21 033-076-021 180.78$ 336.82$
22 033-076-022 180.78$ 336.82$
23 033-076-023 180.78$ 336.82$
24 033-076-024 180.78$ 336.82$
25 033-076-025 180.78$ 336.82$
26 033-076-026 180.78$ 336.82$

EXHIBIT A
14 EXHIBIT C

CYPRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
Diagram &
Assessment No.

Assessor's
Parcel Number
Original
District
Assessment
Overlay District
Assessment
27 033-076-027 180.78$ 336.82$
28 033-076-028 180.78$ 336.82$
29 033-076-029 180.78$ 336.82$
30 033-076-030 180.78$ 336.82$
31 033-076-031 180.78$ 336.82$
32 033-076-032 180.78$ 336.82$
33 033-076-033 180.78$ 336.82$
34 033-076-034 180.78$ 336.82$
35 033-076-035 180.78$ 336.82$
36 033-076-036 180.78$ 336.82$
37 033-076-037 180.78$ 336.82$
38 033-076-038 180.78$ 336.82$
39 033-076-039 180.78$ 336.82$
40 033-076-040 180.78$ 336.82$
41 033-076-041 180.78$ 336.82$
42 033-076-042 180.78$ 336.82$
43 033-076-043 180.78$ 336.82$
44 033-076-044 180.78$ 336.82$
45 033-076-045 180.78$ 336.82$
46 033-076-046 180.78$ 336.82$
47 033-076-047 180.78$ 336.82$
48 033-076-048 180.78$ 336.82$
49 033-076-049 180.78$ 336.82$
50 033-076-050 180.78$ 336.82$
51 033-076-051 180.78$ 336.82$
52 033-076-052 180.78$ 336.82$

EXHIBIT A
15 EXHIBIT C

CYPRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
Diagram &
Assessment No.

Assessor's
Parcel Number
Original
District
Assessment
Overlay District
Assessment
53 033-076-053 180.78$ 336.82$
54 033-076-054 180.78$ 336.82$
55 033-076-055 180.78$ 336.82$
56 033-076-056 180.78$ 336.82$
57 033-076-057 180.78$ 336.82$
58 033-076-058 180.78$ 336.82$
59 033-076-059 180.78$ 336.82$
60 033-076-060 180.78$ 336.82$
61 033-076-061 180.78$ 336.82$
62 033-076-062 180.78$ 336.82$
63 033-076-063 180.78$ 336.82$
64 033-076-064 180.78$ 336.82$
65 033-076-065 180.78$ 336.82$
66 033-076-066 180.78$ 336.82$
67 033-076-067 180.78$ 336.82$
68 033-076-068 180.78$ 336.82$
69 033-076-069 180.78$ 336.82$
70 033-076-070 180.78$ 336.82$
71 033-076-071 180.78$ 336.82$
72 033-076-072 180.78$ 336.82$
73 033-076-073 180.78$ 336.82$
74 033-076-074 180.78$ 336.82$
75 033-076-075 180.78$ 336.82$
76 033-076-076 180.78$ 336.82$
77 033-076-077 180.78$ 336.82$
78 033-076-078 180.78$ 336.82$

EXHIBIT A
16 EXHIBIT C

CYPRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
Diagram &
Assessment No.

Assessor's
Parcel Number
Original
District
Assessment
Overlay District
Assessment
79 033-076-079 180.78$ 336.82$
80 033-076-080 180.78$ 336.82$
81 033-076-081 180.78$ 336.82$
82 033-076-082 180.78$ 336.82$
83 033-076-083 180.78$ 336.82$
84 033-076-084 180.78$ 336.82$
85 033-076-085 180.78$ 336.82$
86 033-076-086 180.78$ 336.82$
87 033-076-087 180.78$ 336.82$
88 033-076-088 180.78$ 336.82$
89 033-076-089 180.78$ 336.82$
90 033-076-090 180.78$ 336.82$
91 033-076-091 180.78$ 336.82$
92 033-076-092 180.78$ 336.82$
93 033-076-093 180.78$ 336.82$
94 033-076-094 180.78$ 336.82$
95 033-076-095 180.78$ 336.82$
96 033-076-096 180.78$ 336.82$
97 033-076-097 180.78$ 336.82$
98 033-076-098 180.78$ 336.82$
99 033-076-099 180.78$ 336.82$
100 033-076-100 180.78$ 336.82$
101 033-076-101 180.78$ 336.82$
102 033-076-102 180.78$ 336.82$
103 033-076-103 180.78$ 336.82$
104 033-076-104 180.78$ 336.82$

EXHIBIT A
17 EXHIBIT C

CYPRESS COVE II

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
Diagram &
Assessment No.

Assessor's
Parcel Number
Original
District
Assessment
Overlay District
Assessment
105 033-076-105 180.78$ 336.82$
106 033-076-106 180.78$ 336.82$
107 033-076-107 180.78$ 336.82$
108 033-076-108 180.78$ 336.82$
109 033-076-109 180.78$ 336.82$
110 033-076-110 180.78$ 336.82$
111
112 Exempt
Exempt

EXHIBIT A
18 E X H I B I T D

METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD

The maintenance of the subdivision exterior boundary landscaping benefits the Assessment District as a whole. Therefore, the assessment spread should be based on the number of building sites or lots contained within the district.

Assessments shall be spread over the 110 lots indicated on the Assessment Diagram (Exhibit A).

EXHIBIT A
19 June 26, 2025 Item No. 11b

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of July 1, 2025

CITY COUNCIL RECEIVING INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION AND

CONSIDER OPENING PUBLIC HEARING, TAKING ANY TESTIMONY
FROM THE PUBLIC AND CONSIDER INTRODUCING ORDINANCE NO.
2025-, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.26 OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE

REGARDING MITIGATION FEES FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN

THE CITY OF MARINA

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Receive informational presentation on a Development Impact Fee Nexus Study; and

2. Adopt the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study; and

3. Open the public hearing and take any testimony from the public, and;

4. Consider introducing Ordinance No. 2025-, amending chapter 3.26 of the Marina Municipal Code regarding mitigation fees for new development within the City of Marina.

BACKGROUND:

The Mitigation Fee Act, Section 66000 et seq. of the California Government Code, and the Marina Municipal Code Chapter 3.26 Mitigation Fees for New Development, provide a mechanism whereby the City may impose and charge mitigation fees as a condition of approval for development projects. These mitigation or public facility impact fees (PFIF) may only be used to offset the cost of certain infrastructure attributable to development.

In 2007, the City contracted with Kimley Horn to conduct a Development Impact Fee Study.

Following this study, the Council adopted public facility impact fees. In 2011, and subsequently in 2016, the Development Impact Fee Study was updated and the City Council adopted updated public facility impact fees.

California Government Code Section 66016.5(c)(8) indicates that studies shall be update d at least every eight years, from the period beginning on January 1, 2022. The City recently contracted with a consulting team to provide an update to the prior impact fee studies through a new Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (Study). To comply with the Government Code and the City’s Municipal Code, the following public notifications were prepared:

• Adopted Resolution 2025-56, acknowledging the Public Hearing Notice and ratifying the setting of a Public Hearing for July 1, 2025, on the proposed intention to adopt an Impact Fee Nexus Study and to amend Chapter 3.26 of the Marina Municipal Code Regarding Mitigation Fees for New Development within the City of Marina.

• Published the notice of public hearing for July 1, 2025 , on May 30, 2025 , on the City’s website and with the June 3, 2025, City Council agenda packet.

1 • Placed a public notice ten days prior to the July 1, 2025 , Council Meeting in the Monterey Herald newspaper on June 20, 2025, and June 26, 2025.

• Published a copy of the new Development Impact Fee Nexus Studies, prior study, and additional related information on the City’s website on June 20, 2025: Development Impact Fees Study Update | Marina, CA - Official Website.

ANALYSIS:

The City’s new Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (Study) is divided into the following two reports and includes updates to the City’s five (5) public facilities impact fee programs:

• City of Marina Development Impact Fee Update for General Government, Public Safety, and Parks (ATTACHMENT A)
o Public building facilities
o Public safety facilities
o Parks

• City of Marina Traffic Impact Fee Update (ATTACHMENT B) o Roadways
o Intersections

The Studies re-evaluate and update the fees developed from the 2016 study; incorporate projects from the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and recommend additional projects. These fees are based on future infrastructure needs that are generated by new development. A list of recommended general government, public safety, and park improvements that were incorporated into the study are included in Attachment A, page 15; and traffic-related projects are included in Attachment B on pages 1 -2. These projects are within t he City’s current General Plan boundaries; and represent a twenty-year growth and project time horizon.

In accordance with new legislation and Government 66016.5 (a)(5)(A), fees imposed on housing development projects shall be based on the square footage of the units of development. These fees were previously calculated based on the type of residential unit. To comply with this section, all fees have been converted to a square footage calculation , and when applicable on a per unit cost based on square feet . Information on the proposed new fees is included in ATTACHMENT C. An overview of this methodology and the legislation will be provided at the Council Meeting. An excerpt from the upcoming presentation which compares the City’s existing fees to the proposed new fee schedule based on typical square footage by residential unit type is included in EXHIBIT D.

The proposed fees are not applicable to all developments. The City has entered into Disposition and Development Agreements (DDA) which include terms related to Development Impact Fees .

The fees related to these developments will be subject to fees in accordance with such agreements. This includes the Dunes and Marina Station developments.

Government Code Section 66016.5 requires the City do all of the following when it conducts an impact fee nexus study:
• Adopt an impact fee nexus study prior to adopting new impact fees. • When applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.
2 • A nexus study shall include information that supports the city’s actions, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 66001.
• If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, the city shall review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fees collected under the original fee.
• A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development.

The actions requested along with the Study are intended to satisfy these requirements.

Additionally, Chapter 3.26.070 of the Marina Municipal Code requires the adoption or increase of fees by ordinance, and in accordance with Government Code Section 66016. Ordinance 2025- XX has been provided for consideration. If Council a dopts the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and introduces Ordinance 2025-, the second reading adopting the ordinance will take place on August 6, 2025. The new fees can only become effective sixty (60) days following the adoption of the ordinance.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adoption of the proposed development impact fees will provide revenue to fund the development driven projects.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council’s approval.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Tori Hannah
Finance Director
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

3 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARINA AMENDING CHAPTER 3.26

OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING

MITIGATION FEES FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT

WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act, at Sections 66000 and following of the California Government Code, provides authority for imposing and charging mitigation fees; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 3.26 of the Municipal Code, the Community Development Director has caused to be prepared and has reviewed a revised version of the “Development Impact Fee Study” initially prepared by RBF Kimley Horn on, dated July 20, 2007 (the “Initial Study”), as updated by RBF Consulting on April 25, 2011 , Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. on May 18, 2016; and further updated by Kimley Horn on June 18, 2025 and Economic and Planning Systems, Inc, (EPS) on June 19 , 20 25 (the “Updated Study”) , incorporated herein by this reference, and on file in the office of the Public Works Division and City Clerk; and

WHEREAS, the Updated Stud y evaluates the impacts of contemplated future development on existing public facilities, public safety, transportation (roadways and intersections), and parks (collectively “Facilities”) in the City of Marina along with an analysis of the need for new Facilities and improvements required by such new development, sets forth the reasonable relationship between such needs and the impacts of the various types of development pending or anticipated for which this fee is charged and describes the estimated costs of those improvements and the continued need for those improvements; and

WHEREAS, the update to the Initial Study by Kimley Horn and EPS were necessary due to the requirements of California Government Code Section 66016.5(c)(8) , changes in the City’s Capital Improvement Program , and revised cost estimates which occurred or were determined subsequent to the completion of the Initial Study; and

WHEREAS, to comply with the Government Code and the City’s Municipal Code, the following public notifications were undertaken:

• Adopted Resolution 2025-56, acknowledging the Public Hearing Notice and ratifying the setting of a Public Hearing for July 1, 2025 on the proposed intention to adopt an Impact Fee Nexus Study and to amend Chapter 3.26 of the Marina Municipal Code Regarding Mitigation Fees for New Development within the City of Marina; and

• Published the notice of public hearing for July 1, 2025 on May 30, 2025 on the City’s website and with the June 3, 2025 City Council agenda packet; and

• Placed a public notice ten days prior to the July 1, 2025 Council Meeting in the Monterey Herald newspaper on June 20, 2025 and June 26, 2025; and

WHEREAS, a duly noticed public meeting regarding the mitigation fees recommended by the update to the Study was held before this Council pursuant to Section 3.26.070 (B)(1) of the Municipal Code and California Government Code Section 66016 on July 1 , 20 25, and the Updated Study was made available to the public at least 10 days prior to the meeting; and

4 Ordinance No. 2025-
Page Two

WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing regarding the mitigation fees recommended by the Updated Study was held before this Council pursuant to Section 3.26.070 (B)(4) of the Municipal Code and California Government Code Section 66018 on July 1, 2025.

THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:

a) Having reviewed and considered the Updated Study and the testimony and materials presented at the public hearing, this Council approves and adopts the Updated Stud y and further finds that new development in the City of Marina will generate additional population within the City and will impact the Facilities defined and analyzed in the Updated Study.

b) There is a need in the City of Marina for Facilities that have not been constructed, or have been constructed but for which new development has not contributed its fair share of facility costs, and said Facilities have been called for in or are consistent with Updated Study.

The cost estimates set forth in the Updated Study are the reasonable cost estimates in 20 24 dollars for constructing these Facilities, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs.

d) The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described Facilities and the impacts of the types of developme nt described herein by Exhibit A Tables 1 and 2, herein adopted and incorporated by reference as if set forth herein in their entirety , and there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable relationships and nexus are in more detail described in the Updated Study.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA INCORPORATES

THE ABOVE RECITALS AND FINDINGS AS IF FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN AND DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

1. Section 3.26.050 Amended: Section 3.26.050 of Chapter 3.26, entitled

“Payment of Fees” is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“3.26.050 Payment of fees.

For new development, mitigation fees shall be charged and payable as set out in Table 1 of this chapter, as set forth in the attached one (1) page, marked Exhibit “A,” and incorporated herein by this reference thereto. The director shall determine, based on the type of development, the corresponding fee to be paid pursuant to this chapter. Except as otherwise provided by law or development agreement, the fees shall be paid at the time of issuance of any building permit for new development within the city.

2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force sixty (60) days from and after its final passage.

5 Ordinance No. 2025-
Page Three

3. Posting of Ordinance. Within fifteen (15) days after the passage of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted in the three (3) public places designated by resolution of City Council.

4. Any fee, ordinance or resolution previously adopted in conflict with this Ordinance hereby is repealed as to any portion thereof in conflict with this Ordinance.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on 1st day of July 2025, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting duly held on the 6th day of August 2025, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

6 Land Use Category per Unit
Public
Facilities
(General Gov.) Public Safety Parks Total
Residential
Single Family
Units 900 SF or less per Unit $787 $1,907 $4,585 $7,279 Units 901-2,999 SF per KSF $874 $2,119 $5,094 $8,087
Units 3,000 SF or greater per Unit $2,622 $6,356 $15,283 $24,261 Multifamily
Units 500 SF or less per Unit $807 $1,957 $4,706 $7,470 Units 501-1,599 SF per KSF $1,615 $3,914 $9,413 $14,942 Units 1,600 SF or greater per Unit $2,584 $6,263 $15,060 $23,907 Senior Homes
Units 500 SF or less per Unit $682 $1,653 $3,976 $6,311 Units 501-1,599 SF per KSF $1,364 $3,307 $7,952 $12,623 Units 1,600 SF or greater per Unit $2,183 $5,291 $12,723 $20,197 Assisted Living
Units 500 SF or less per Unit $341 $827 $1,988 $3,156
Units 501-1,599 SF per KSF $682 $1,653 $3,976 $6,311
Units 1,600 SF or greater per Unit $1,091 $2,645 $6,361 $10,097 Nonresidential
Office/Research per KSF $998 $2,420 - $3,418
Retail/Service per KSF $599 $1,452 - $2,051
Industrial per KSF $200 $484 - $684
Hotel per KSF $272 $660 - $932
Church per KSF $200 $484 - $684
Daycare Center per KSF $799 $1,936 - $2,735
Animal Hospital/Vet Clinic per KSF $1,198 $2,904 - $4,102 Medical/Dental per KSF $1,198 $2,904 - $4,102
(1) SF = Square Feet, KSF = 1,000 Square Feet.

Exhibit A
Table 1 - Public Facilities, Public Safety, Parks (1)
7 Exhibit A
Land Use Category per Unit Intersections Roadways Total Residential
Single Family per KSF $2,239 $8,236 $10,475
Senior Homes per Unit $2,429 $8,932 $11,361
Assisted Living per Unit $1,465 $5,388 $6,853
Multifamily per Unit $3,798 $13,968 $17,766
Nonresidential
Office/Research per KSF $6,045 $22,234 $28,279
Retail/Service per KSF $15,050 $55,351 $70,401
Industrial per KSF $2,772 $10,197 $12,969
Hotel per KSF $4,456 $16,388 $20,844
Church per KSF $4,018 $14,776 $18,794
Daycare Center per KSF $23,790 $87,499 $111,289
Animal Hospital/ClinicAnimal Hospital/Vet Clinic per KSF $12,240 $45,017 $57,257 Medical/Dental per KSF $20,495 $75,377 $95,872
(1) SF = Square Feet, KSF = 1,000 Square Feet.

Table 2 - Intersections and Roadways (1)
8 Report
Fee Update and Nexus Study
City of Marina
Development Impact Fee Update
for General Government, Public
Safety, and Parks

Prepared for:

City of Marina

Prepared by:

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

EPS #231081

June 19, 2025
9 Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................. 4 Legal Context ............................................................................................... 5 Summary of Maximum Allowable Fees .............................................................. 7 Summary of Methodology ............................................................................... 9 Demographic and Land Use Assumptions .......................................................... 9 Facility and Vehicle Needs and Costs .............................................................. 14 Cost Allocation and Fee Calculation ................................................................ 14 Nexus Findings ........................................................................................... 19 Summary of Impact Fees ............................................................................. 21

10 List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of Maximum Fee Calculations ................................................... 7 Table 2 Summary of Maximum Fee Calculations ................................................... 8 Table 3 Population and Employment Projections ................................................. 10 Table 4 Existing Service Population Factor Estimate ............................................ 11 Table 5 Forecasted Service Population Estimate .................................................. 12 Table 6 Average Household Size and Employment Density Assumptions ................. 13 Table 7 Marina DIF CIP for General Government, Public Safety, and Parks .............. 15 Table 8 CIP Costs Attributable to Service Population Growth ................................. 16 Table 9 CIP Cost Summary by Fee Program vs Other City Sources ........................ 17 Table 10 Facilities Costs per Resident and Employee ............................................. 18 Table 11 Development Impact Fee Calculation Overview ........................................ 19 Table 12 Summary of Maximum Per-Square-Foot Development Impact Fees ............ 22 Table 13 Single Family Fee Per Square Foot Conversion......................................... 23 Table 14 Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion ............................................ 24 Table 15 Senior Homes Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion ........................ 25 Table 16 Assisted Living Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion ....................... 26 11 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 4
Introduction and Results
Introduction
This Fee Update and Nexus Study (Nexus Study) provides the City of Marina with the necessary technical documentation to support adoption of updated development impact fees, including General Government (formerly Public Buildings), Public Safety, and Parks Fee programs. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) prepared the Nexus Study based on capital improvement planning and city growth forecasting data provided by the City of Marina. EPS conducted the analysis and reporting under a subcontract with Kimley-Horn.

General Government, Public Safety, and Parks Fee Programs may be approved by the City Council and would be effective 60 days following the City’s adoption of the fees.

A Development Impact Fee (DIF) is a one-time charge levied on new real estate development. DIFs are collected and used by local jurisdictions (e.g., a City or County) to find infrastructure and capital investments needed to serve new residential and commercial growth. Consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act (AB 1600/ Government Code Section 66000 et seq.) and related legislation, this Nexus Study provides a legal basis for three DIFs charged by the City of Marina. DIF program elements that may be established by a City Ordinance and implemented by Resolution.

The Nexus Study determines the relationship between city growth and capital improvements and provides associated fee calculations that identify the maximum fee levels the City may charge. As with current fees in Marina, updated fees would be collected on a citywide basis given the broad scope of capital improvements included in this study. While the City may elect to charge lower fees for specific land uses, areas of the city, or across the board, such reductions must be offset by alternative funding that supports the improvement program.

The fee program described in this Nexus Study is based on capital investments identified by the City that serve to maintain or increase citywide service levels. The fee program focuses on a roughly 20-year time frame and, as such, relies on forecasts for growth, development, and associated capital facilities needs over that period. To inform fee levels, the City identified specific capital facility project investments. Importantly, these capital projects may be altered or replaced over time with other qualifying projects as the City administers the fee program.

This Nexus Study and the technical information it contains should be maintained and reviewed periodically by the City to ensure ongoing relevancy and accuracy, and to enable the adequate programming of funding sources. To the extent that improvement requirements, costs, population, employment, visitors or development potential changes over time, the fee program will be updated.
12 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 5
Legal Context
The Mitigation Fee Act allows the City to adopt citywide public facilities impact fees consistent with supporting technical analysis and findings provided in this Nexus Report.

In addition, the “Mitigation Fees for New Development” section of the City’s Municipal Code allows the City Council to use the Resolution approach to set updated fees, and to periodically adjust the fees as may be necessary over time, without amending the enabling local ordinance.

Impact fee revenues are used to cover the cost of capital investments, including buildings, infrastructure improvements, and equipment required to serve new development and growth. DIFs must be based on a reasonable nexus, or connection, between new development and the need for capital investments and improvements.

Impact fee revenue cannot be used to cover the operation and maintenance costs of these or any other facilities. In addition, impact fee revenue cannot be collected or used to cover the cost of preexisting infrastructure needs or deficiencies.

In establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition for the approval of a development project, Government Code 66001(a) and 66001(b) require a local agency to:

1. Identify the purpose of the fee;

2. Identify how the fee is to be used;

3. Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the fee use and type of development project for which the fee is being used;

4. Determine how the need for the public facility relates to the type of development project for which the fee is imposed; and

5. Show the relationship between the fee and the cost of the public investments.

Furthermore, in September 2021, the State of California adopted Assembly Bill (AB) 602, which includes several new requirements related to the development and implementation of impact fee programs. The key provisions related to the calculations documented in this Nexus Report are summarized below.
• Capital Improvement Plan: AB 602 requires that jurisdictions adopt a capital improvement plan as part of the nexus study process. This adoption can occur at the same time as fee adoption. Accordingly, this Nexus Study relies on a Marina DIF Capital Improvement Plan (Marina DIF CIP) to be approved by the City Council in conjunction with the DIF Program.
1 The Marina DIF CIP presented in this Nexus

1 The Marina DIF CIP is different from and does not replace the City's 5-year CIP budget and 10-year CIP. These separate CIP documents serve a shorter period and generally rely on more specific project parameters than the DIF CIP. However, the DIF program may provide funding to support some projects included in the 5-year and 10-year CIPs. 13 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 6
Study includes the capital improvements identified by the City for General Government, Public Safety, and Parks (Table 7).
• Explanation of Level of Service and Fee Increase: AB 602 requires that when applicable, the nexus study identifies the existing level of service for each public facility, identifies the proposed new level of service, and includes an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. This Nexus Study relies on a CIP prepared by City staff, based on City capital facilities and improvement goals for general government, public safety, and parks. Appendix A-3, identifies current and future level of service implied by the Marina DIF CIP. In general, service levels are expected to improve, with service quality increases still anticipated in cases where standard per capita service level metrics indicate a modest decrease. The Marina DIF CIP reflects the City’s goals for citywide public services provision in the areas of general government, public safety, and parks by 2045. • Capital Facilities List: The City developed a detailed list of capital facilities and equipment acquisitions planned over the next twenty years. The list includes City administrative (general government) facilities and equipment, emergency services facilities and equipment, and recreational facilities and equipment. These capital investments will serve both existing and new development. The DIF allocates a portion of the facilities and equipment costs to new development using “service population” to quantify the nexus between growth and public investments. This nexus framework is consistent with the “System Plan Method” nexus study methodology.2
• Per Square Foot Residential Fees: AB 602 notes that for fees adopted after July 1, 2022, the nexus study must “either calculate a fee levied or imposed on a housing development proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units, or make specific findings explaining why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate the fees.” AB 602 also notes that “This bill would require that a local agency that calculates fees proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.” This analysis relies on assumptions about the unit size for residential units developed following market research and City data. Average home sizes determine the maximum per square foot fee for each residential development type.

This Nexus Study adheres to State of California statutory requirements for DIFs, as documented in subsequent chapters. Chapter 4 summarizes the specific findings that explain or demonstrate the nexus logic employed. If the DIF is adopted, this Nexus Study and the technical information it contains should be maintained and reviewed periodically by the City to ensure its accuracy and to enable adequate programming of funding

2 Impact Fee Nexus Study Templates Nexus Study and Residential Feasibility Calculation Templates in fulfillment of AB 602, December 2023, Prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley.
14 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 7
sources. To the extent that capital improvement requirements, costs, and/or development projections change over time, the DIF levels estimated here will need to be updated. AB 602 requires the DIF to be updated at least every eight years.

Summary of Maximum Allowable Fees
Table 1 summarizes the City’s maximum allowable fee schedule for the capital facility and equipment needs as evaluated in this Fee Update. The three fee categories updated in this analysis are:
• General Government – This fee, formerly “Public Buildings,” includes the capital facilities fees for administrative and airport buildings, City vehicles, and equipment. • Public Safety – This fee includes the capital facilities fees for the Police and Fire Departments of the City.
• Parks – This fee includes capital facilities fees for the Recreation & Culture Department of the City.

Table 1 presents per-square-foot fees for residential and commercial structures. The Nexus Study also establishes per-unit maximum and minimum residential fees levels, not shown here.

Table 1 Summary of Maximum Allowable Fee Calculations

Land Use
General
Government
Public
Safety Pa rks Total
Residential (per sq.ft.)
Single Family $0. 87 $2.12 $5.09 $8.09
Multifamily $1.61 $3.91 $9.41 $14.94
Senior Homes $1.36 $3.31 $7.95 $12.62
Assisted Living $0.68 $1.65 $3.98 $6.31
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.) $1.00 $2.42 - $3.42
Retail (per sq. ft.) $0.60 $1.45 - $2.05
Industrial (per sq. ft.) $0.20 $0.48 - $0.68
Hotel (per sq.ft.) $0.27 $0.66 - $0.93
Church (per sq.ft.) $0.20 $0.48 - $0.68
Daycare (per sq.ft.) $0.80 $1.94 - $2.73
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.) $1.20 $2.90 - $4.10
Medical (per sq.ft.) $1.20 $2.90 - $4.10
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
15 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 8
Fees in Table 1 represent the maximum allowable per-square-foot amount that the City can charge based on the nexus requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act. The fees include a three percent (3.0%) charge to cover the cost of program administration. This Fee Update and Nexus Study is available to support City Council adoption of an updated fee schedule. Based on economic and fiscal considerations, the City of Marina may approve any impact fee level that falls below the maximum allowable.

Table 2 compares the maximum fees calculated in this Nexus Study to the existing fee schedule in the City of Marina. As shown, adoption of the maximum allowable fees would result in a fee increases. Table 2 presents residential fees on a per-unit basis, for the average size dwelling unit, for comparison purposes only. The Appendix contains additional fee comparison detail, including presentation of minimum and maximum fees for each category.

Table 2 Summary of Maximum Fee Calculations

Development Impact Fee Methodology
This section provides a brief overview of the nexus methodology and key assumptions used in this Study, including demographic and land use projections underlying the fee.

Chapter 3 provides more detailed calculations for each DIF category.

Current Fees (2025)
Land Use
General
Government
Public
Safety Parks Total
Excluding Roadways and
Intersections
Residential (per unit)
Single Family $2,098 $5,085 $12,227 $19,409 $16,848
Multifamily $1,776 $4,306 $10,354 $16,436 $15,599
Senior Homes $1,501 $3,637 $8,747 $13,885 $11,231
Assisted Living $750 $1,819 $4,373 $6,942 $6,238
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.) $1.00 $2.42 $3.42 $1.00
Retail (per sq. ft.) $0.60 $1.45 $2.05 $0.60
Industrial (per sq. ft.) $0.20 $0.48 $0.68 $0.20
Hotel (per sq.ft.) $0.27 $0.66 $0.93 $0.27
Church (per sq.ft.) $0.20 $0.48 $0.68 $0.20
Daycare (per sq.ft.) $0.80 $1.94 $2.73 $0.80
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.) $1.20 $2.90 $4.10 $1.20
Medical (per sq.ft.) $1.20 $2.90 $4.10 $1.20
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
16 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 9
Summary of Methodology
The nexus methodology employed in this study is generally consistent across fee categories. As is appropriate given the range fee programs, capital facilities, and equipment covered, the study recognizes variation in the relevant service population. For each fee category, EPS applied the following general steps to calculate the nexus- supported fee amounts:

1. EPS reviewed existing and future population and employment projections defined by the City for the Study.

2. EPS reviewed new capital facility improvements and other capital investments needed to serve both existing and future residents and employees. City staff identified long- term capital investment plans for general government, public safety, and parks.

3. EPS reviewed the cost estimates prepared by City staff for specific capital investments identified in Step 2.

4. EPS allocated the capital costs identified in Step 3 between existing and new development based on nexus apportionment. Because the CIP will serve both existing and the future populations similarly, the share of costs attributable to new development is based on the new service population (attributable to growth) relative to the total citywide service population at the end of the fee program time horizon.

5. EPS distributed costs attributable to growth to residential and commercial uses to arrive at a cost per resident and a cost per employee. The distribution reflects the service population forecast for residents versus employees, recognizing that residents and employees place different demands on City services.

6. EPS relied on estimates of household size for each residential land use category to derive a fee per unit. Commercial land use fees were determined using typical employment density factors.

7. EPS converted the residential fee to a per-square-foot fee based on average housing unit sizes and then used typical maximum and minimum home sizes to establish maximum and minimum fee levels for residential uses.

Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
This section describes the demographic and land use assumptions used in this Study:
• Existing population and employment establish a basis from which growth forecasts and service levels for specific capital improvement categories are measured.
• Future population and employment growth inform capital improvement needs and the apportionment of these costs between existing and new development. 17 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 10
• Estimates of population and employment density (e.g., persons per household) inform the allocation of costs between land use categories.

Population and Employment Growth Projections
The Nexus Study relies on estimated population and employment growth to the year 2045. The growth projections reflect City development capacity and development trends rather than specific real estate development projects “in the pipeline” at the local level.

As summarized in Table 3, the projection indicates a total population of approximately 31,231 residents and total employment of approximately 9,478 by 2045. This equates to an increase of 8,895 residents and 3,318 employees, representing a 39.8 percent and

53.9 percent increase over existing conditions, respectively.

Table 3 Population and Employment Projections

Service Population Calculations
The DIF Study requires calculations that translate population and employment projections into estimates of existing and future service population. The service population is derived from assumptions that compare residents and employees based on relative service demands. The City’s population and employment, presented in Table 3, are the basis of the service population calculations described below.

Service population can differ by municipal service category. The service population for Parks excludes local employees, a key difference associated with the Parks fee calculation. For General Government and Public Safety fee programs, service population is based on the City’s existing “daytime population,” derived using the City’s existing residents, employees, and commute patterns for each to estimate the relative time spent within the City. This approach establishes an employee to resident equivalency factor to allocate costs between existing and new growth and between residential and commercial development. This Nexus Study calculates a citywide service population in 2024 Amount % Change
Resident Population 22,336 31, 231 8,895 39.8%
Households 7,813 10,926 3,113 39.8%
Employment 6,160 9,478 3,318 53.9%
Sources: Kimley-Horn; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Item 2024 2045 Growth
18 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 11
estimated at 24,795, as shown in Table 4. The service population is composed of 22,336 residents and 6,160 employees, with each employee equivalent to 0.399 residents (i.e., the typical service demand of an employee is about 40 percent of a resident).

Table 4 Existing Service Population Factor Estimate

The General Government and Public Safety service population is projected to reach 35,014, with new growth accounting for about 29.2 percent of the service population in 2045, as shown in Table 5. The Parks service population, which is limited to residents, accounts for 28.5 percent of total service population in 2045. For the General Government and Public Safety service population, service population growth is largely attributable to residential expansion, with 87.0 percent of the service population increase attributable to residential uses and 13.0 percent attributable to employment. These # %
Marina Residents
Employment Status1 Formula a b = a * b
Not in Labor Force 10,359 46.4% 100% 46.4%
Employed in the City 994 4.5% 67% 3.0%
Employed Outside of the City 10,982 49.2% 67% 33.0%
Total Residents 22,336 100.0% 82.4%
Marina Employees
Place of Residence1 Formula b c = a * b
Live in the City 1,081 9.0% 33% 3.0%
Live Outside the City 5,079 91.0% 33% 29.9%
Total Jobs 6,160 100.0% 32.9%
Employee to Resident Equivalency Factor3 39.9%
Service Population
Calculation Count Weight Service Population Distribution Residents 22,336 100.0% 22,336 90%
Employees 6,160 39.9% 2,459 10%
Total Service Population 24,795 100%
(3) Equals weighted average of residents divided by weighted average of employees.

Sources: LEHD OnTheMap; JobsEQ; CA DOF; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (2) Assumptions regarding relative demand for City Services by resident type and employees. (1) Distribution based on data from U.S. Census (OnTheMap 2022) and Census ACS.

Item
Existing
Weight2 Weighted Average
19 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 12
proportions are used to allocate costs for General Government and Public Safety facilities and equipment included in the DIF. For Parks, cost attributable to growth is allocated entirely to residential uses since employees are not included in the parks service population.

Table 5 Forecasted Service Population Estimate

Population and Employment Density Assumptions
The Nexus Study uses population and employment density assumptions by land use type.

DIF cost estimates per capita or per job are converted to fee rates per unit or square foot based on average persons per household or square footage per employee density factors.

For residential fees, EPS first calculated all residential fees on a per unit basis (i.e., per single family and multi-family) and then converts the fee to a per-square-foot level based on typical housing unit sizes. Additional residential uses evaluated include Senior Homes and Assisted Living, which the Study assumes have equivalent size characteristics to typical multifamily units. Table 6 summarizes key assumptions, derived from U.S.

Service Population
Calculation
Unweighted
Count Weight
General
Government &
Public Safety
Service
Population Distribution
Parks Service
Population Distribution
2024 Service Population
Residents 22,336 100.0% 22,336 90.1% 22,336 100.0%
Employees 6,160 39.9% 2,459 9.9% 0 0.0%
Total Service Population 24,795 100.0% 22,336 100.0%
2045 Service Population
Residents 31,231 100.0% 31,231 89.2% 31,231 100.0%
Employees 9,478 39.9% 3,783 10.8% 0 0.0%
Total Service Population 35,014 100.0% 31,231 100.0%
Growth in Service Population 2024-2045
Residents 8,895 8,895 87.0% 8,895 100.0%
Employees 3,318 1,324 13.0% 0 0.0%
Total Service Population 10,219 100% 8,895 100%
Growth Allocation Factors1

29.2% 28.5%
(1) Growth allocation reflects future growth in service population as a percentage of total service population in 2045. 20 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 13
Census Bureau, CoStar Group, and City of Marina data, as well as EPS profession judgement.

Table 6 Average Household Size and Employment Density Assumptions

Fee Calculation
This Chapter describes the technical methodology for the DIFs. Fees will cover a variety of public buildings and vehicles, including those for needed for Police, Fire, Parks, and other City department functions. It is assumed that both residential and nonresidential development will pay both the General Government and Public Safety fees, while the Parks fee will only be paid by residential uses.

Land Use Fee Categories
Average Unit Size
Single Family 2,400 square feet
Multifamily 1,100 square feet
Residential1
Single Family 2.80 people per household
Senior Homes 2.00 people per household
Multifamily 2.37 people per household
Assisted Living 1.00 people per household
Nonresidential2
Office 300 square feet per employee
Retail 500 square feet per employee
Industrial 1,500 square feet per employee
Hotel 2 rooms per employee
Church 1,500 square feet per employee
Daycare 375 square feet per employee
Animal Hospital/ Clinic 250 square feet per employee
Medical 250 square feet per employee
Assumptions for Population & Employment
(1) Average single family and multifamily household size per occupied housing unit in the City of Marina based on data from the 2023 American Community Survey (5-Year Estimates), U.S. Census Bureau. (2) Average employment density derived from previous Marina studies. Lodging assumes 0.5 employees per 550-square-foot per room (i.e., 2 rooms per employee).

Sources: U.S. Census ACS 2023 5-Year Estimates; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 21 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 14
Facility and Vehicle Needs and Cos ts
DIFs are derived from specific capital improvement projects and associated costs that are needed to maintain or grow City service levels, in part to accommodate new growth. The Nexus Study identifies capital improvements included in the fee program and associated cost estimates, as shown in Table 7. City staff provided the capital improvement program list and costs, drawing on internal City facilities planning and consultations with architects and facilities planners. To ensure that capital project costs included in the impact fees do not address existing deficiencies, only an appropriate portion of total costs is ultimately allocated to future growth and included in the fee program.

Cost Allocation and Fee Calculation
General Government, Public Safety, and Parks improvements are allocated to new development based on the proportion of 2045 service population attributable to new development. That is, the portion of the CIP cost allocated to the fees is based on service population growth in the City as a percentage of the City’s future 2045 service population. As shown in Table 8, this translates to 27 percent of DIF CIP costs being allocated to new development, overall. The “growth allocation factor” for vehicles, which is lower than for building and facilities, reflects that new growth occurs over time as vehicle replacement costs are incurred (See Appendix Table A-2 for vehicle cost allocation calculations).
22 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 15
Table 7 Marina DIF CIP for General Government, Public Safety, and Parks

Capital Improvement Item Description C ost Estimate
General Government
City Hall 17,500 Square Feet $14,100,000
Council Chambers 2,500 Square Feet $2,000,000
Airport Facilities T-Hangars and Box Hangars $10,000,000 Corporation Yard Expansion Additional Capacity $4,000,000 General Government Vehicles 8 Vehicles $1,500,000
General Government Equipment Miscellanious $695,000
Subtotal $32,295,000
Police Department
Police Department Buildings 15,000 Square Feet (13,000 + 2,000) $12,750,000 Police Department Vehicles 34 Vehicles $13,000,000
Subtotal $25,750,000
Fire Department
Fire Department Headquarters 20,200 Square Feet (12,400 + 7,800) $17,170,000 Fire 3 Bay Substation 7,300 Square Feet (3,300+4,000) $6,205,000 EOC/Classroom 3,500 Square Feet $2,975,000
Fire Department Vehicles 16 Vehicles $21,000,000
Subtotal $47,350,000
Recreation & Culture Department
Sports & Aquatic Center 74,000 Square Feet $45,000,000
Senior Center 14,000 Square Feet $9,100,000
Army Chapel 3800 Square Feet $2,470,000
Youth /Community Center 5000 Square Feet $3,250,000
Teen Center Expansion 2000 Square Feet $1,300,000
Preston Park Ballfield Expansion 9.3 Acres $10,550,000
Equestrian Center Redevelopment 30.5 Acres $10,000,000
Dunes Park 17 Acres $22,600,000
Glorya Jean Tate Park 4.2 Acres $8,000,000
Equestrian Boarding Facility 3 Acres $1,000,000
Disc Golf Course & Parking 1 Acre $100,000
Locke Paddon Park $2,000,000
Trail System Around City/FORTAG Trail $10,000,000
Lake Court Beach Access Trail $2,000,000
Lake Drive Park and Recreation Facility $2,000,000
Arts Village Renovation and Access $10,000,000
Vince DiMaggio/Locke Paddon Bridge $4,000,000
Culture and Recreation Department Vehicles 9 Vehicles $1,400,000 Subtotal $144,770,000
Total $250,165,000
23 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 16
Table 8 CIP Costs Attributable to Service Population Growth

Capital Improvement Item

DIF CIP
Net Cost
Estimate1
Cost
Allocated
to Growth
Growth
Allocation
Factor
General Government Departments
City Hall $14,100,000 $4,115,282 29%
Council Chambers $2,000,000 $583,728 29%
Airport Facilities $10,000,000 $2,918,640 29%
Corporation Yard Expansion $4,000,000 $1,167,456 29%
General Government Vehicles $1,500,000 $280,919 19%
General Government Equipment $695,000 $202,845 29%
Fund Balance Adjustment -$6,253,071 -$1,825,046 29%
Subtotal $26,041,929 $7,443,824 29%
Public Safety
Police Department Buildings $12,750,000 $3,721,266 29%
Police Department Vehicles $13,000,000 $2,415,174 19%
Fire Department Headquarters $17,170,000 $5,011,304 29% Fire 3 Bay Substation $6,205,000 $1,811,016 29%
EOC/Classroom $2,975,000 $868,295 29%
Fire Department Vehicles $21,000,000 $4,699,010 22%
Fund Balance Adjustment -$1,649,804 -$481,518 29%
Subtotal $71,450,196 $18,044,547 25%
Recreation & Culture Department
Sports & Aquatic Center2 $44,965,000 $12,806,624 28%
Senior Center $9,100,000 $2,591,800 28%
Army Chapel $2,470,000 $703,489 28%
Youth /Community Center $3,250,000 $925,643 28%
Teen Center Expansion $1,300,000 $370,257 28%
Preston Park Ballfield Expansion2 $10,500,000 $2,990,538 28% Equestrian Center Redevelopment $10,000,000 $2,848,132 28% Dunes Park $21,100,000 $6,009,558 28%
Glorya Jean Tate Park2 $7,800,000 $2,221,543 28%
Equestrian Boarding Facility2 $1,000,000 $284,813 28%
Disc Golf Course & Parking $100,000 $28,481 28%
Locke Paddon Park $2,000,000 $569,626 28%
Trail System Around City/FORTAG Trail $10,000,000 $2,848,132 28% Lake Court Beach Access Trail $2,000,000 $569,626 28%
Lake Drive Park and Recreation Facility $2,000,000 $569,626 28% Arts Village Renovation and Access $10,000,000 $2,848,132 28% Vince DiMaggio/Locke Paddon Bridge $4,000,000 $1,139,253 28% Culture and Recreation Department Vehicles $1,400,000 $277,693 20% Fund Balance Adjustment -$9,952,131 -$2,834,498 28%
Subtotal $133,032,869 $37,768,467 28%
Total $230,524,995 $63,256,838 27%
2 Reflects reduction for Fee Progrm funding allocation. 1 Net cost estimate reflects cost reductions associated with funding from Fee Program allocations to projects and remaining balances through June 30, 2024.
24 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 17
Table 9 illustrates the total costs included in the fee program for each fee category, along with costs that would be covered by other City funding sources (assuming maximum fee levels).

Table 9 CIP Cost Summary by Fee Program vs Other City Sources

Table 10 allocates costs by basic land use category, either residential or commercial, and then calculates the cost per resident and employee. These cost calculations also introduce a three percent (3.0%) administration charge for the fee programs. Table 11 utilizes the cost per resident figure to calculate fees for each department. These fee calculations result in residential impact fees that are presented on a per-unit basis.

However, AB 602 requires that residential impact fees be charged on a per square foot basis. As described and outlined in the summary of fees in Chapter 4, residential fees per unit have been converted into a fee per square foot based on typical housing unit sizes.

Facilities
Fee
Funded
Other City
Funding
CIP
Total
General Government $7,443,824 $18,598,105 $26,041,929
Public Safety $18,044,547 $53,405,649 $71,450,196
Recreation & Cultural Services Department $37,768,467 $95,264,402 $133,032,869 Total $63,256,838 $167,268,157 $230,524,995
25 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 18
Table 10 Facilities Costs per Resident and Employee

Cost Allocation Factor Formula
General
Government
Public
Safety
Recreation &
Culture
CIP Costs Allocated to Fee Program $7,443,824 $18,044,547 $37,768,467 Fee Program Administration (3%) $223,315 $541,336 $1,133,054 Total Costs Allocated to Fee Program a $7,667,139 $18,585,884 $38,901,521 Cost Allocation to Land Use1
Residential Development b 87.0% 87.0% 100.0%
Nonresidential Development c 13.0% 13.0% 0.0%
Allocated Costs by Land Use
Residential Development d = a * b $6,673,567 $16,177,369 $38,901,521 Nonresidential Development e = a * c $993,572 $2,408,514 $0 Service Population Growth
Residents f 8,895 8,895 8,895
Employees (unweighted) g 3,318 3,318 N/A
Facilities Cost per Resident h = d / f $750 $1,819 $4,373 Facilities Cost per Employee i = e / g $299 $726 N/A
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
[1] The cost allocation to residential and nonresidential development is based on the service population attribution calculated in Table 4.
26 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 19
Table 11 D evelopment Impact Fee Calculation Overview

Nexus Findings and Impact Fee Summary
This chapter documents the necessary findings for approval of General Government, Public Safety, and Parks DIF programs for the City of Marina, as required under Government Code Section 66000 (AB1600 Mitigation Fee Act). The discussion that follows articulates the "nexus" between new development in Marina and the infrastructure improvements needed to serve that growth. Table 12 summarizes the maximum DIF levels, presented as per-square-foot fees. Tables that follow (Table 13 through Table 16) present recommended maximum and minimum per-unit fees for each residential use type.

Nexus Findings
The maximum allowable DIFs applicable to new development are calculated based on the proportionate share of demand for Marina DIF CIP investments that each land use type generates through 2045. With this context, the following findings are made regarding the Fee Program. This section addresses the following:
• Identify the purpose of the fee;
Land Use
Density
(See Table 5)
General
Government
Public
Safety Pa rks
Facilities Cost per Resident $750 $1, 819 $4,373
Facilities Cost per Employee $299 $726 -
Residential (per unit) Persons / Household
Single Family 2.80 $2,098 $5,085 $12,227
Multifamily 2.37 $1,776 $4,306 $10,354
Senior Homes 2.00 $1,501 $3,637 $8,747
Assisted Living 1.00 $750 $1,819 $4,373
Nonresidential Average Employment Density
Office (per sq. ft.) 300 $1.00 $2.42 -
Retail (per sq. ft.) 500 $0.60 $1.45 -
Industrial (per sq. ft.) 1,500 $0.20 $0.48 -
Hotel (per sq.ft.) 1,100 $0.27 $0.66 -
Church (per sq.ft.) 1,500 $0.20 $0.48 -
Daycare (per sq.ft.) 375 $0.80 $1.94 -
Animal Hospital/ Clinic (per sq.ft.) 250 $1.20 $2.90 -
Medical (per sq.ft.) 250 $1.20 $2.90 -
Source: City of Marina and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 27 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 20
• Identify how the fee is to be used;
• Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the fee use and type of development project for which the fee is being used;
• Determine how the need for the public facility relates to the type of development project for which the fee is imposed; and
• Show the relationship between the fee and the cost of the public investments.

Purpose and Use of Fees
General Government
The fee will fund replacement of essential government facilities, including City Hall and the City Council Chambers, as well as new Airport facilities. The fee also will fund capital investments in City vehicles and equipment. The updated General Government fee covers new development’s fair share portion of the total capital investment costs identified by the City, based on service population apportionment. General Government improvement total costs and fee program costs are documented in Chapter 3.

Public Safety
The fee will fund replacement and expansion of public facilities for Fire and Police department functioning, including a police station, fire department headquarters, and a fire department substation. The fee also will fund capital investments in emergency vehicles and equipment. The updated Public Safety fee covers new development’s fair share portion of the total capital investment costs identified by the City, based on service population apportionment. The Public Safety improvement total costs and fee program costs are documented in Chapter 3.

Parks Fee
The fee will fund improvements at existing parks as well as new facilities that serve Marina residents. Parks program investments include a sports and aquatic center, a senior center, a youth center, a teen center expansion, and a range of improvements in existing parks. The fee will also fund vehicles. The updated Parks fee covers new development’s fair share portion of the total capital investment costs identified by the City, based on service population apportionment. Parks improvement total costs and fee program costs are documented in Chapter 3.

Relationship between Use of Fees and Type of Development New development in the City of Marina will require additional public facilities and capital investments to maintain or improve levels of service and meet the needs of new residents and employees. The DIF revenue will be used to fund the fair share cost of new facilities, improvements, and equipment based on current and projected City service populations. While some of the improvements included in the CIP will also benefit existing 28 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 21
land uses, the costs allocated to the DIF programs only include the proportion of cost attributable to new development.

Relationship between Need for Facility and Type of Project The infrastructure improvements identified in this study are designed to accommodate the needs of existing and future service populations. The Marina DIF CIP presented here reflects current City goals for General Government, Public Safety, and Parks facilities and equipment, as identified by City staff. Fees will apply to land uses that generate new residents and workers and thereby increase service burden on the City. The Marina DIF CIP addresses the service needs of new populations.

Relationship between Fee Amount and Cost Facilities Attributed to Development
The fee levels calculated in this Nexus Study are based on a fair share cost allocation to new service population-generating citywide development. Overall, about 27 percent of the CIP investment costs are allocated to future development, which corresponds with growth as a percentage of future service population. The remainder of the CIP cost is attributable to existing land uses in the city and would be funded by other sources available to the City.

Summary of Impact Fees
Table 12 summarizes the Public Buildings, Public Safety, and Parks fees for residential and nonresidential uses. The maximum fee estimates include a three percent (3.0%) program administration fee. This administration cost covers expenses for preparation of the development impact fee and subsequent updates, as well as the required reporting, auditing, collection, and other annual administrative costs involved in overseeing the program.
29 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 22
Table 12 Summary of Maximum Per-Square-Foot Development Impact Fees

AB 602 requires that residential impact fees be charged on a per square foot basis, as shown above. Table 13 through Table 16 present calculations of fee conversions into per square foot fees. EPS has also provided a recommended minimum and maximum per unit fee, based on the approximate range of typical unit sizes.

Parks General
Government
Public
Safety
Unit Size (sq.ft.)
Average1
a K|H; City; Zillow
Units equal or less than2
b EPS Assumption
Units equal or greater than3
c Redfin
Fee / Unit
Average4
$12,227 $2,098 $5,085 d
Minimum5
$4,585 $787 $1,907 e = d * (b / a)
Maximum6
$15,283 $2,622 $6,356 f = d * (c / a)
Fee Amounts
< 900 sq.ft. (per unit) $4,585 $787 $1,907 see "e"
900 - 3,000 sq.ft. (per sq. ft.) $5.09 $0.87 $2.12 = d / a > 3,000 sq.ft. (per unit) $15,283 $2,622 $6,356 see "f" 900
Item
Amount
Formula Source /
Assumption
2,400
(6) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of maximum unit size to the average unit size. 3,000
(1) Represents average square footage of recently built single family housing in Marina, based on Zillow sales data and City of Marina building permit applications.
(2) Minimum size has been adjusted to reflect the square footage for a 1-person household, based on the average unit size (2,373 sq. ft.) and average persons per household (2.80) in Marina. (3) Represents high end of home size in Marina based on Redfin sales data. (4) Based on the average development impact fee per unit as calculated in Table 10. (5) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of minimum unit size to the average unit size. 31 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 24
Table 14 Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion

Parks General
Government Public Safety
Unit Size (sq.ft.)
Average1
a Redfin
Units equal or less than2
b EPS Assumption
Units equal or greater than3
c Redfin
Fee / Unit
Average4
$10,354 $1,776 $4,306 d
Minimum5
$4,706 $807 $1,957 e = d * (b / a)
Maximum6
$15,060 $2,584 $6,263 f = d * (c / a)
Fee Amounts
< 500 sq.ft. (per unit) $4, 706 $807 $1,957 see "e"
500 - 1,600 sq.ft. (per sq. ft.) $9.41 $1.61 $3.91 = d / a > 1,600 sq.ft. (per unit) $15,060 $2,584 $6,263 see "f" 500
Item
Amount
Formula Source /
Assumption
1,100
(6) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of maximum unit size to the average unit size. 1,600
(1) Represents average square footage of multifamily housing in Marina based on Redfin data. (2) Minimum size has been adjusted to reflect the square footage for a 1-person household, based on the average unit size (1,100 sq. ft.) and average persons per household (2.37) in Marina. (3) Represents high end of multifamily housing size in Marina based on Redfin data. (4) Based on the average development impact fee per unit as calculated in Table 10. (5) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of minimum unit size to the average unit size. 32 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 25
Table 15 Senior Homes Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion

Parks General
Government Public Safety
Unit Size (sq.ft.)
Average1
a Redfin
Units equal or less than2
b EPS Assumption
Units equal or greater than3
c Redfin
Fee / Unit
Average4
$8,747 $1,501 $3,637 d
Minimum5
$3,976 $682 $1,653 e = d * (b / a)
Maximum6
$12,723 $2,183 $5,291 f = d * (c / a)
Fee Amounts
< 500 sq.ft. (per unit) $3, 976 $682 $1,653 see "e"
500 - 1,600 sq.ft. (per sq. ft.) $7.95 $1.36 $3.31 = d / a > 1,600 sq.ft. (per unit) $12,723 $2,183 $5,291 see "f" (6) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of maximum unit size to the average unit size. 1,600
(1) Represents average square footage of multifamily housing in Marina based on Redfin data. (2) Minimum size has been adjusted to reflect the square footage for a 1-person household, based on the average unit size (1,100 sq. ft.) and average persons per household (2.37) in Marina. (3) Represents high end of multifamily housing size in Marina based on Redfin data. (4) Based on the average development impact fee per unit as calculated in Table 10. (5) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of minimum unit size to the average unit size. 500
Item
Amount
Formula Source /
Assumption
1,100
33 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 26
Table 16 Assisted Living Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion

Parks General
Government Public Safety
Unit Size (sq.ft.)
Average1
a Redfin
Units equal or less than2
b EPS Assumption
Units equal or greater than3
c Redfin
Fee / Unit
Average4
$4,373 $750 $1,819 d
Minimum5
$1,988 $341 $827 e = d * (b / a)
Maximum6
$6,361 $1,091 $2,645 f = d * (c / a)
Fee Amounts
< 500 sq.ft. (per unit) $1, 988 $341 $827 see "e"
500 - 1,600 sq.ft. (per sq. ft.) $3.98 $0.68 $1.65 = d / a > 1,600 sq.ft. (per unit) $6,361 $1,091 $2,645 see "f"
(6) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of maximum unit size to the average unit size. 1,600
(1) Represents average square footage of multifamily housing in Marina based on Redfin data. (2) Minimum size has been adjusted to reflect the square footage for a 1-person household, based on the average unit size (1,100 sq. ft.) and average persons per household (2.37) in Marina. (3) Represents high end of multifamily housing size in Marina based on Redfin data. (4) Based on the average development impact fee per unit as calculated in Table 10. (5) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of minimum unit size to the average unit size. 500
Item
Amount
Formula Source /
Assumption
1,100
34 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 27

Appendix

35 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 28
Appendix Table 1 Existing Facilities

Facility Address E xisting Amount
General Government (Building Sq.Ft.)
Annex Building 209 Cypress Ave. 3,420
Church Building 2801 2nd Ave. 3,816
Council Chambers 211 Hillcrest Ave. 2,304
City Hall 211 Hillcrest Ave. 6,115
Old Corp. Yard Building 3040 Lake Ct 3,800
Animal Shelter Building 3040 Lake Drive 665
Corp Yard Building 2660 Fifth Avenue 10,166
Subtotal 30,286
Vehicles 7
Fire (Building Sq.Ft.)
Fire Station 210 8th St. 15,000
Subtotal 15,000
Vehicles 14
Police (Building Sq.Ft.)
Public Safety Building 211 Hillcrest Ave. 12,474
Subtotal 12,474
Vehicles 31
Park Facilities (Acres)
Tate Park Grass/Baseball/Softball: 3255 Abdy Way 3.3
Community Center Playground 211 Hillcrest Ave. 0.3
Los Arboles Sports Complex 327 Reindollar Ave. 13.3
Preston Park 3100 Preston Dr. 9.3
Vince DiMaggio Park 3200 Del Monte Ave. 4.8
Windy Hill 3240 DeForest Rd.@ Beach Rd. 1.8
Locke-Paddon Park 190 Seaside Cir. 20.1
Glorya Jean Tate Park 3254 Abdy Way 4.2
Equestrian Center 2830 5th Avenue 30.5
Dunes Park 2nd Avenue between 6th & 8th 42.0
Hilltop Park 4th Avenue at 9th Street 12.0
Subtotal Acres 141.6
Recreation and Culture Facilities (Building/Facilitiy Sq.Ft.) Library 190 Seaside Cir. 18,600
Tate Park Scout House 3254 Abdy Way 1,440
Community Center 211 Hillcrest Ave. 6,597
Teen Center 304 Hillcrest Ave. 3,552
Snack Bar and Building 327 Reindollar Ave. 910
Preston Park Building 3100 Preston Dr. 1,668
Windy Hill Park Building 3240 DeForest Rd.@ Beach Rd. 2,483 Bathrooms 190 Seaside Cir. 300
Veterinary Clinic Building 3140 2,160
Barns 2830,2832,2834,2836,2838 Fifth Avenue 16,300
Subtotal Building/Facility Square Feet 54,010
Teen Center Skate Park 304 Hillcrest Ave. 14,875
Vehicles 5
Source: City of Marina
36 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 29
Appendix Table 2 Vehicle CIP Detail

Appendix Table 3 Level of Service Comparison

Department
Existing
Vehicles
New
Vehicles
Average Per
Vehicle Cost
Replacement
Frequency
Total
Cost1
Cost Allocated
to Growth
2024-
2045
General Government Vehicles 7 1 $50, 000 5 Years $1,500,000 $280,919 Police Department Vehicles 31 3 $100,000 5 Years $13,000,000 $2,415,174 Fire Department Vehicles2 14 2 $700,000 10 Years $21,000,000 $4,699,010 Recreation and Cultural
Services Department Vehicles 5 4 $50,000 5 Years $1,400,000 $277,693 Total 57 $900,000 $36,900,000 $7,672,796
[2] Based on a weighted average of fire department vehicle types, including Type 1 and 3 fire engines, trucks, utility vehicles, command vehicles, and rescue vehicles.
[1] Assumes that new vehicles are purchased at the midpoint of the devlopment timeline (i.e., no vehicle replacement is required in the intial years of the fee program)
Existing
Inventory
Existing Service
Level1
Existing + CIP for
2045
2045 Service
Level1
a b = a /
(24,934 / 1,000) c d = c *
(44,219 / 1,000)
General Government
Building Space2 30,286 1,221 41,867 1,196 square feet
Vehicle Fleet 7 0.3 8 0.2 vehicles
Police Department
Police Station2 12,474 503 15,000 428 square feet
Vehicle Fleet 31 1.3 34 1.0 vehicles
Fire Department
Fire Stations 15,000 605 31,000 885 square feet
Vehicle Fleet 14 0.6 16 0.5 vehicles
Recreation and Culture
Parkland 141.6 5.7 206.6 5.9 acres
Recreation Buildings 54,010 2,178 152,810 4,364 square feet Teen Center Skate Park 14,875 600 14,875 425 square feet Vehicle Fleet 5 0.2 9 0.3 vehicles
(1) Calculations reflect existing and future City facilities and equipment per 1,000 service population. (2) See Appendix Table A-1 table for detailed list of exiting facilities included.

Item Units
37 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 30
Appendix Table 4 General Government Fee Comparison

Appendix Table 5 Public Safety Fee Comparison

2025
Current Fee
Per-Square-
Foot Fee
Per-Unit
Minimum Fee
Per-Unit
Maximum Fee
Residential (per sq.ft.)
Single Family $4,983 $0.87 $787 $2,622
Multifamily $4,615 $1.61 $807 $2,584
Senior Homes $3,323 $1.36 $682 $2,183
Assisted Living $1,845 $0.68 $341 $1,091
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.) $0.35 $1.00
Retail (per sq. ft.) $0.21 $0.60
Industrial (per sq. ft.) $0.07 $0.20
Hotel (per sq.ft.) $0.09 $0.27
Church (per sq.ft.) $0.07 $0.20
Daycare (per sq.ft.) $0.28 $0.80
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.) $0.42 $1.20
Medical (per sq.ft.) $0.42 $1.20
Updated Maximum Allowable Fees
2025
Current Fee
Per-Square-
Foot Fee
Per-Unit
Minimum Fee
Per-Unit
Maximum Fee
Residential (per sq.ft.)
Single Family $1,074 $2.12 $1,907 $6,356
Multifamily $993 $3.91 $1,957 $6,263
Senior Homes $714 $3.31 $1,653 $5,291
Assisted Living $397 $1.65 $827 $2,645
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.) $0.65 $2.42
Retail (per sq. ft.) $0.39 $1.45
Industrial (per sq. ft.) $0.13 $0.48
Hotel (per sq.ft.) $0.18 $0.66
Church (per sq.ft.) $0.13 $0.48
Daycare (per sq.ft.) $0.52 $1.94
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.) $0.78 $2.90
Medical (per sq.ft.) $0.78 $2.90
Updated Maximum Allowable Fees
38 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study June 19, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 31
Appendix Table 6 Parks Fee Comparison

Appendix Table 7 Combined Fee Comparison

2025
Current Fee
Per-Square-
Foot Fee
Per-Unit
Minimum Fee
Per-Unit
Maximum Fee
Residential (per sq.ft.)
Single Family $10,791 $5.09 $4,585 $15,283
Multifamily $9,991 $9.41 $4,706 $15,060
Senior Homes $7,194 $7.95 $3,976 $12,723
Assisted Living $3,996 $3.98 $1,988 $6,361
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.)
Retail (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
Hotel (per sq.ft.)
Church (per sq.ft.)
Daycare (per sq.ft.)
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.)
Medical (per sq.ft.)
Updated Maximum Allowable Fees
2025
Current Fee
Per-Square-
Foot Fee
Per-Unit
Minimum Fee
Per-Unit
Maximum Fee
Residential (per sq.ft.)
Single Family $16,848 $8.09 $7,278 $24,261
Multifamily $15,599 $14.94 $7,471 $23,907
Senior Homes $11,231 $12.62 $6,311 $20,196
Assisted Living $6,238 $6.31 $3,156 $10,098
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.) $1.00 $3.42
Retail (per sq. ft.) $0.60 $2.05
Industrial (per sq. ft.) $0.20 $0.68
Hotel (per sq.ft.) $0.27 $0.93
Church (per sq.ft.) $0.20 $0.68
Daycare (per sq.ft.) $0.80 $2.73
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.) $1.20 $4.10
Medical (per sq.ft.) $1.20 $4.10
Updated Maximum Allowable Fees
39 City of Marina
Traffic Impact Fee
Update
Report
Prepared for:

City of Marina
June 18, 2025
Attachment B
40 Table of Contents
Programmed CIP Transportation Projects ............................................................................... 1 Growth Projections .................................................................................................................... 4 Land Use Growth Projections ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Land Use Trip Generation.............................................................................................................................................................. 5 AB 602 Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 7 Level of Service Analysis Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Level of Service Results .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Housing Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................................14 Nexus Allocation and Fee Calculations ..................................................................................19 Allocation to Users ........................................................................................................................................................................19 Fee Calculations .............................................................................................................................................................................21 Required Program Elements ...................................................................................................23 Appendices ..............................................................................................................................24 Appendix A: Level of Service Analysis Outputs .......................................................................................................................24 41 List of Figures
Figure 1 – Marina TIF Program Projects ............................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Tables
Table 1 – Proposed City of Marina TIF Projects – Intersections and Roadways ....................................................................... 1 Table 2 – New Development Impact Fee Area Land Use Projections ......................................................................................... 5 Table 3 – Citywide Growth Projections .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Table 4 – Trip Demand Factors............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Table 5 – Land Use Growth Converted to Adjusted Daily Trips .................................................................................................... 6 Table 6 – Methodology and Measure of Effectiveness .................................................................................................................. 7 Table 7 – Methodology and Measure of Effectiveness .................................................................................................................. 8 Table 8 – Intersection Level of Service Summary ......................................................................................................................... 10 Table 9 – Roadway Capacity Level of Service Summary .............................................................................................................. 12 Table 10 – Pedestrian Level of Comfort Summary ....................................................................................................................... 13 Table 11 – Bicycle Level of Stress Summary ................................................................................................................................... 14 Table 12 – City of Marina Trip Generation Data – Replica 2023 ............................................................................................... 15 Table 13 – No. of Single-Family Unit Detached Structures by AHS Square Foot Category.................................................. 16 Table 14 – Daily Vehicle Trips for All Households in Each AHS Square Foot Category ......................................................... 17 Table 15 – Single-Family Units Built in City of Marina’s Surrounding Region ......................................................................... 17 Table 16 – Estimated EDUs for Single-Family Units by Square Foot Groupings..................................................................... 18 Table 17 – Project Costs Eligible for TIF .......................................................................................................................................... 20 Table 18 – Calculation of Fee per Adjusted Daily Trip ................................................................................................................. 21 Table 19 – Fee per Land Use Category ............................................................................................................................................ 21 Table 20 – Fee for Single Family Residential Land Use by Size .................................................................................................. 22 42 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
1 | Page
Programmed CIP Transportation Projects
For this TIF Program update, the project team worked closely with City staff to conduct a comprehensive review of the transportation projects to be included in the program. This review identified 26 projects focused on intersection and roadway improvements, which have been included in this study. The area covere d by the TIF P ro gram a nd the locatio n of p roje cts pro posed for in clusion i n the fee prog ram ar e shown in Figure 1.

Cost estimates for each project were provided by the City Staff which were updated to 2024 dollars where applicable. The project list including the 2024 dollars cost estimates is shown inTable 1.

Table 1 – Proposed City of Marina TIF Projects – Intersections and Roadways ID Project Name Description1
Estimated
Cost
(2024 dollars)
Intersection Improvement Projects
1 2nd Avenue & Inter-Garrison
Road
Construct a second left turn lane for the eastbound
approach, additional through lane for westbound
approach and right-turn pocket at southbound
approach at the intersection of 2nd Avenue and
Inter-Garrison Road.
$875,200
2 Imjin Road & 8th Street Implement modern roundabout at the intersection of Imjin Road and 8th Street. $1,800,000
3 California Drive & 8th Street Implement modern roundabout at the intersection of California Drive and 8th Street. $1,750,300
4 Reservation Road & Salinas
Avenue
Signalize intersection of Reservation Road and
Salinas Avenue. $2,438,600
5 Imjin Parkway bridge @ SR 12 Restripe lanes to accommodate two WB lanes on the Imjin Parkway bridge over SR 1. $41,400
6 SR 1 Southbound off-ramp @
Imjin Parkway2
Convert the southbound off-ramp to a loop
configuration at SR 1 and Imjin Parkway
interchange.
$3,182,400
7 SR 1 Southbound on-ramp @
Imjin Parkway2
Widen the southbound on-ramp at SR 1 and Imjin
Parkway interchange to accommodate two lanes. $795,600
8 Del Monte Boulevard & Beach
Road
Widen the existing roundabout at the intersection
of Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road to 2-lanes. $3,182,400 9 Imjin Parkway & 2nd Avenue
Construct a second eastbound right turn lane and
dedicated westbound right-turn lane at the
intersection of Imjin Parkway and 2nd Avenue.
$6,583,200
10 Reservation Road & Del Monte
Boulevard
Construct a multi lane roundabout at the
intersection of Reservation Road & Del Monte
Boulevard.
$4,000,000
11 California Avenue & Marina
Heights Drive
Signalize intersection of California Avenue and
Marina Heights Drive. $1,384,400
12 SR1 Southbound Ramp @
Reservation Rd
Signalize intersection of SR1 Southbound Ramp and
Reservation Road. $4,000,000
43 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
2 | Page
Table 1 – Proposed City of Marina TIF Projects – Intersections and Roadways ID Project Name Description1
Estimated
Cost
(2024 dollars)
13 SR1 Northbound Ramp @
Reservation Road
Signalize intersection of SR1 Northbound Ramp and
Reservation Road. $4,000,000
14 Cardoza Avenue & Reservation
Road
Construct westbound right turn only lane from
Cardoza Avenue to SR1 Northbound Ramp. $3,500,000
15 Del Monte Boulevard and
Patton Parkway Roundabout
Construct a new Roundabout intersection at Del
Monte Boulevard and Patton Parkway $6,000,000
Roadway Improvement Projects
16 Del Monte Boulevard
Extension3
Construct new 2-lane collector between Imjin
Parkway and Reindollar Avenue. $17,000,000
17 8th Street from California
Avenue to Inter-Garrison
Road3
Reconstruct 8th Street into 2-lane arterial with a
two-way-left-turn lane between California Avenue
and Inter-Garrison Road.
$9,449,700
18 Salinas Avenue - Reservation
Road to Carmel Avenue3
Reconstruct Salinas Avenue into a 2-lane collector
between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue. $5,200,000
19 Imjin Parkway & SR1
Interchange
Reconstruct interchange between Imjin Parkway
and SR1. $24,385,300
20 Del Monte Boulevard - Beach
Road to Marina Greens Drive
Widen Del Monte Boulevard to a 4-lane arterial
between Beach Road and Marina Greens Drive. $13,411,900 21 Del Monte Boulevard & SR 1
Interchange
Reconstruct interchange between Del Monte
Boulevard and SR1. $24,385,300
22 Reservation Road – Beach
Road to SR 1
Widen Reservation Road to a 4-lane divided arterial
with a two-way-left-turn lane between Beach Road
and SR1 Southbound Ramp.
$9,599,250
23 Reservation Road - Imjin Road
to Blanco Road
Widen Reservation Road to a 6-lane expressway
between Imjin Road and Blanco Road. $13,036,400
24 Airport Access Road
Construct new access road from University Drive
and Mbest Drive intersection to the existing access
road connecting to Ramco Enterprises building
providing additional connection to the Marina
Municipal Airport.
$6,190,000
25 Reservation Road – Del Monte
Boulevard to California Street
Improve Reservation Corridor from Del Monte
Boulevard to California Street with six roundabout
intersections, install separated bike facilities and
install new sidewalks.
$31,174,100
26 Del Monte Corridor –
Reindollar Avenue to
Reservation Road
Improve Del Monte Corridor with two roundabout
intersections at Reindollar Avenue and Palm
Avenue, install separated bike facilities and
sidewalks.
$16,258,700
Total $213,624,150
Notes:
1: Project 1 through 20 are intersection improvement project and Project 21 through 29 are roadway improvement projects. 2: Projects 5, 6, & 7 are considered as intersection projects and analyzed as one combined intersection improvement. 44 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
3 | Page
Figure 1 – Marina TIF Program Projects
45 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
4 | Page
Growth Projections
This chapter details the population and employment growth projections used for the TIF update. Note that these are consistent with those based on the population and employment projections from the City’s most recent General Plan and Housing Element Update. Projections by land use category and trip generation by land use are discussed below.

Land Use Growth Projections
The growth projections for the approved and pending developments were determined in coordination with the City and incorporated into the Association of Monterey Bay Governments’ travel demand model (AMBAG TDM) used for this study. The AMBAG TDM utilizes a base year of 2015 and a future year of 2045, representing the conditions expected when the City’s General Plan and Housing Element are fully built out.

As part of this study, the model’s base year was revised to reflect 2024 conditions. The growth projections were converted into population, households and employments as input to the model.

The proposed land uses were distributed throughout the Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) that represent the proposed growth in the City and were added to the base year household and employment numbers to represent the future build out scenario. In order to estimate the number of employees for the non- residential land uses to input into the model, the ratio of daily trip generation rates listed in the Trip Generation Handbook, 11th Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) between 1,000 square-feet and employees was used. The number of daily trips produced by the size of each of the land use codes for office, retail and industrial was used to back calculate the number of employees based on each land use’s equation for the number of trips that are produced by each employee.

While the AMBAG TDM uses household as its input, there is no differentiation between single-family and multi-family residential in terms of trip generation and distribution. However, the AMBAG TDM is a hybrid model as its processes follow the traditional four-step model (trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and trip assignment), but it also contains a population synthesis step based on socioeconomic data collected throughout the AMBAG region to produce individuals living in each household that contain their own trip making characteristics. Therefore, the population synthesis step was completed to develop the population estimates for the future growth in the City. The land use estimates for future growth are summarized in Table 2. The population, household and employment estimates for the base year and future year are summarized in Table 3. It is estimated that the growth in the impact fee area will increase the City population by approximately 8,895 people and will generate about 3,318 new jobs. 46 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
5 | Page
Table 2 – New Development Impact Fee Area Land Use Projections Projects
Single
Family
(DU)
Multi
Family
(DU)
Office
(KSF)
Retail
(KSF)
Industrial
(KSF)
Hotel
(Rooms)
UCMBEST - - 266 34 88 150
Downtown Specific Plan - 500 128 219 0 -
Dunes 683 - 0 35 0 300
Marina Station 709 651 144 60 652 -
Sea Haven 476 - 0 0 0 -
3298 Del Monte - 94 0 0 0 -
Total 1,868 1,245 537 348 740 450
Table 3 – Citywide Growth Projections
Growth Category 2024 Base Year
for AMBAG Model
2045 Horizon Year
for AMBAG Model
2024 to 2045
Growth
Population 22,336 31,231 8.895 (40%)
Households 7,813 10,926 3.113 (40%)
Employment/Jobs 6,160 9,478 3,318 (54%)
Land Use Trip Generation
To assess the TIF across various land uses a Trip Demand Factor (TDF) is calculated, which reflects the trip g e n e r a t i o n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f e a c h l a n d u s e t h a t p r o d u c e s n e w v e h i c l e t r i p s o n t h e r o a d w a y s y s t e m i n Marina. Each land use has unique trip generation characteristics including base trip generation rate, pass- b y t r i p r a t e s a n d t i m e - o f - d a y v a r i a t i o n t h a t a r e u s e d a s i n p u t s i n c a l c u l a t i n g t h e T D F . T h e d a i l y t r i p generation rates have been obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition as shown in Table 4. The daily trip generation rates are used to be consistent with the previous TIF study.

TDFs are calculated by multiplying the daily trip rate by the new trip percentage for each land use. The new trip percentage for each land use was obtained from SANDAG’s Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates and accounts for the fact that some trips generated by the land uses will be pass-by or otherwise pre- existing trips. As these trips are already on the City’s roadway network, they cannot be included as part of the growth used to calculate the fees for the 2024 TIF Program. 47 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
6 | Page
Table 4 – Trip Demand Factors
Fee Category
(Development Type) Unit ITE Lane
Use Code
Daily Trip
Rate1
New Trip
Percentage2
Trip Demand
Factor
Residential
Single Family Unit 210 9.43 97% 9.15
Multifamily Unit 220 6.74 97% 6.54
Nonresidential
Office KSF 710 10.84 96% 10.41
Retail KSF 820 37.01 70% 25.91
Industrial KSF 110 4.87 98% 4.77
Hotel Room 310 7.99 96% 7.67

1. Reflects average number of daily trips for the unit type indicated based on data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition).

2. This factor accounts for the fact that some trips generated by the land uses will be pass-by or otherwise pre-existing trips.

Source is Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates, SANDAG, April 2002.

The adjusted TDFs are used to calculate the total growth in adjusted daily trips generated by each land use type. The growth projected to occur in the City of Marina was taken from the City’s General P lan and Housing Element and in consultation with the City, as outlined inTable 5. As shown inTable 5, the land use growth was multiplied by its respective adjusted trip rate to calculate the total daily trip generation growth in the City. These calculations resulted in an estimated adjusted daily citywide trip increase of 46,817 between 2024 and 2045.

Table 5 – Land Use Growth Converted to Adjusted Daily Trips Land Use Type Unit Quantity Adjusted
Daily TDF
Adjusted
Daily Trips
Single Family DU 1,868 9.15 17,087
Multifamily DU 3,649 6.54 8,140
Office KSF 1,718 10.41 5,592
Retail KSF 1,107 25.91 9,016
Industrial KSF 1,005 4.77 3,532
Hotel Rooms 150 7.67 3,452
Total 46,817
48 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
7 | Page
AB 602 Analysis
Assembly Bill (AB) 602 was approved on September 28, 2021, and went into effect on January 1, 2022. This legislation requires that impact fee nexus studies adopted on or after January 1, 2022, must, as appropriate, identify the existing level of service for each public facility, specify the new level of service once an improvement (project) is constructed, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is necessary. It is important to note that AB 602 does not specifically define the basis for the required level of service analyses. Consequently, the methods used to assess the level of service for various public facilities must be tailored to the type of facility being analyzed and the information available.

AB 602 also mandates that studies adopted after July 1, 2022, must calculate fees levied or imposed on housing development projects proportionate to the square footage of the proposed units, or provide specific findings explaining why square footage is not an appropriate metric for fee calculation. In essence, development impact fees must be stratified based on the size of the housing unit or be supported by findings justifying the decision not to stratify the fees. As part of this study, an AB 602 deficiency analysis and fee stratification analysis were conducted.

The AB 602 analysis evaluated 26 projects, summarized inTable 1 earlier, which involved improvements to public facilities. The projects identified for the required level of service (LOS) analysis under AB 602 were categorized as either an intersection or roadway improvement. Projects 1 through 15 were analyzed as intersection LOS improvements, Project 16 through 24 were analyzed as roadway LOS improvements and Projects 25 and 26 were analyzed as roadway safety improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Level of Service Analysis Methodology
Table 6 summarizes the methodology and MOE that was used to determine existing and future conditions depending on the type of improvement.

Table 6 – Methodology and Measure of Effectiveness
Improvement Type Methodology Measure of Effectiveness
Intersection HCM LOS (Delay)
Roadway Capacity Roadway Volume LOS Threshold LOS (V/C) Roadway Ped/Bike Roadway LTS Threshold LOS (LTS)
Note: HCM = Highway Capacity Manual, LOS = Level of Service, Volume-to-Capacity Ratio, LTS=Level of Traffic Street The intersection LOS analysis for AB 602 was conducted for the PM peak-hour which represents the worst traffic conditions, and roadway LOS analysis was conducted for the daily traffic.

Intersection Level of Service
Analysis of intersection level of service (LOS) is based on the Highway Capacity Manual’s (HCM) concept of LOS. The HCM defines the LOS of a facility as a qualitative measure used to describe operational conditions.

LOS rang es f rom A (f ree flow tra ffic with m inim al d el ay) to F (he avy con ge stion ope ratin g ne ar or ove r capacity). LOS was determined using methodologies defined in HCM 7th Edition, the current edition at the time of the analysis. The LOS criteria is summarized in Table 7. 49 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
8 | Page
Existing condition traffic counts during the AM (7 AM – 9 AM) and PM (4 PM – 6 PM) peak period were collected in September 2023. Future 2045 No Build and 2045 Build volumes were developed by adding travel demand model growth to existing counts. The travel demand model maintained by Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG model) was used to determine future traffic growth.

Table 7 – Methodology and Measure of Effectiveness
Level of Service
(LOS)
Signalized
Delay (sec/veh)
Unsignalized
Delay (sec/veh)
A ≤ 10 ≤ 10
B > 10.0 – 20.0 > 10.0 – 15.0
C > 20.0 – 35.0 > 15.0 – 25.0
D > 35.0 – 55.0 > 25.0 – 35.0
E > 55.0 – 80.0 > 35.0 – 50.0
F > 80.0 > 50.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition
Note: For All-way stop-control intersection (AWSC), LOS is defined based on average intersection delay.

For two-way stop-controlled intersections (TWSC), LOS is defined based on the worst movement delay.

According to the City of Marina General Plan, the City aims to maintain LOS D or better as the standard at all interse ctions. Th ere fore, fo r this a nalysis int ers ecti ons c alculat ed to op erat e at LOS E or LOS F were determined to be deficient.

Roadway Capacity
Roadway improvements were evaluated based on threshold average daily traffic volumes (ADT) for various facility types. The daily volume thresholds are based on the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 and intended for preliminary planning purposes only. Existing condition volumes for the study roadway segments were collected from the Replica Big Data platform. Replica provides travel data by mode as well as by roadway segments. Future 2045 No Build and 2045 Build volumes were developed by adding model growth to existing volumes. Note that while the City aims to maintain an LOS D or better on its roadways, for the purposes of this analysis a deficient roadway is one that operates at LOS E or LOS F.

Roadway Pedestrian and Bicycle
Roadway pedestrian and Bicycle improvements analysis utilized pedestrian level of comfort (LOC) and Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) methodology. Both of these methodologies quantify amount of discomfort pedestrian or bicyclist may experience when traveling close to vehicle traffic. The LOC or LTS methodology assigns a numerical ranking between 1-4, where 1 is very comfortable and 4 is undesirable, based on facility attributed such as speed, number of travel lanes, pathway widths, etc. This analysis utilized modified LOC and LTS methodologies from Montgomery County their methodology accounts for additional factors.
50 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
9 | Page
Level of Service Results
This section presents a summary of results for each project. Detailed analysis tables and outputs are included in Appendix B.

Intersection
Interse ction LOS an alysis was com plet ed for P ro je cts 1 through 20.Table 8 p res ents a sum m ary of th e intersection LOS. Note that as discussed previously, LOS is presented in terms of the PM Peak-hour.

Project 1 evaluated the 2nd Avenue and Inter-Garrison Road intersection. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing PM LOS from A to B. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 1 will improve operations to LOS A for PM.

Project 2 evaluated the Imjin Road and 8th Street intersection. This intersection operates at an LOS A in existing PM conditions. Under future conditions, the intersection operates at LOS C under PM conditions.

Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 2 will improve operations to LOS A for PM.

Project 3 evaluated the California Drive/5th Avenue and 8th Street intersection. This intersection operates at LOS A for existing and future PM conditions. Future development will slightly increase delay at this intersection. Project 3 will decrease the delay and keep operations to LOS A for PM.

Project 4 evaluated the Reservation Road and Salinas Avenue intersection. It is estimated that future development will slightly increase delay at this intersection. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 4 will improve operations to LOS A from C for PM.

Project 5, Project 6, and Project 7 evaluated all Highway 1 ramps that intersect with Imjin Parkway. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing PM LOS from C to E. Project 5, Project 6, and Project 7 will add geometric improvements to each intersection that will result in no delay.

Project 8 evaluated the Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road intersection. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing PM LOS from A to B. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 8 will improve operations to LOS A for PM.

Project 9 evaluated the Imjin Parkway and 2nd Avenue intersection. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing PM LOS from B to D. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 9 will decrease delay, but operations remain at LOS D for PM.

Project 10 evaluated the Del Monte Boulevard and Reservation Road intersection. It is estimated that future development will slightly increase delay at this intersection. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 10 will slightly decrease delay, but operations remain at LOS C for PM.

Project 11 evaluated the California Avenue and Marina Heights Drive intersection. It is estimated that future development will slightly increase delay at this intersection. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 11 will improve operations to LOS A for PM.
51 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
10 | Page
Project 12 evaluated the Reservation Road and SR1 Southbound Ramp intersection. This intersection operates at an LOS F in PM in existing and future conditions, which would be considered an existing deficiency. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 12 will improve operations to LOS C for PM.

Project 13 evaluated the Reservation Road and SR1 Northbound Ramp intersection. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing PM LOS from B to C. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 13 will improve operations to LOS B for PM.

Project 14 evaluated the Cardoza Avenue and Reservation Road intersection. It is estimated that future development will remain the same for PM at LOS A. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 14 will remain the same as baseline future conditions.

Project 15 evaluated the Del Monte Boulevard and Patton Parkway intersection. This intersection is a future project, and therefore does not have an existing or future no project LOS. Under future with project conditions, the intersection is estimated to have an LOS of A.

Table 8 – Intersection Level of Service Summary
Project #
Existing
Control
Type
Project
Control
Type
Existing 2045 No Project 2045 Project
Delay
sec/veh LOS Delay
sec/veh LOS Delay
sec/veh LOS

1. 2nd Ave. & Inter-Garrison Rd. AWSC Signal 9.4 A 11.1 B 7.9 A

2. Imjni Rd. & 8th St. AWSC RAB 9.2 A 17.7 C 6.2 A

3. California Dr./5th Ave. & 8th St. SSSC RAB 7.2 A 7.2 A 2.9 A

4. Reservation Rd. & Salinas Ave. SSSC Signal 15.8 C 20.5 C 6.1 A

5. Imjin Pkwy. Overpass at SR1 Signal - 22.5 C 63.2 E
New Interchange
with Free Flow6. SR1 Southbound Off-ramp & Imjin Pkwy. Signal - 22.5 C 63.2 E

7. SR1 Southbound On-ramp & Imjin Pkwy. Signal - 22.5 C 63.2 E

8. Del Monte Blvd. & Beach Rd. RAB RAB 6.6 A 11.7 B 6.3 A

9. Imjin Pkwy. & 2nd Ave. Signal Signal 16.3 B 54.9 D 54.5 D

10. Del Monte Blvd. & Reservation Rd. Signal Signal 24.1 C 37.7 C 36.4 C

11. California Ave. & Marina Heights Dr. SSSC Signal 12.1 B 13.0 B 8.4 A

12. SR1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd. SSSC Signal 101.3 F 563.4 F 18.9 B

13. SR1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd. SSSC Signal 14.2 B 20.6 C 11.8 B

14. Cardoza Ave. & Reservation Rd. AWSC Signal 9.4 A 9.5 A 9.5 A

15. Del Monte and Patton Parkway RAB RAB - - - - - A
Note:

Intersections that operate at LOS E or F are Bold.

Intersection and All-way stop-control intersection (AWSC) reported as intersection delay/LOS. Side-street stop-controlled intersections (SSSC) is reported as the worst movement's delay/LOS.

Roundabouts (RAB) report overall delay/LOS
52 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
11 | Page
Roadway Capacity
R o a d w a y L O S a n a l y s i s w a s c o m p l e t e d f o r P r o j e c t s 1 6 t h r o u g h 2 4 .T a b l e 9p r e s e n t s a s u m m a r y o f t h e roadway LOS.

Project 16 e v a l u a t e d D e l M o n t e ( 2 n d A v e ) b e t w e e n R e i n d o l l a r A v e n u e a n d I m j i n P a r k w a y . T h i s r o a d segment is a future project, and therefore does not have an existing or future no project LOS. Under future with project conditions, the roadway is estimated to have an LOS of A.

Project 17 evaluated 8th Street between 3rd Avenue and Inter-Garrison Road. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from A to B. Under With Improvement Future conditions, project 17 will improve roadway operations to LOS A.

Project 18 evaluated Salinas Avenue between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue. This roadway operates at LOS A for Existing, Future, and Future with Improvement conditions.

Project 19 e v a l u a t e d S R 1 I n t e r c h a n g e a t I m j i n P a r k w a y . I t i s e s t i m a t e d t h a t f u t u r e d e v e l o p m e n t w i l l d e t e r i o r a t e t h e e x i s t i n g L O S f r o m A t o F . U n d e r W i t h I m p r o v e m e n t F u t u r e c o n d i t i o n s , p r o j e c t 1 9 w i l l improve roadway operations to LOS A.

Project 20 evaluated Del Monte Boulevard between Beach Road to Marina Greens Drive. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from A to D. Under With Improvement Future conditions, project 20 will improve roadway operations to LOS A.

Project 21 evaluated SR 1 Interchange at Del Monte Boulevard. This roadway operates at LOS B for Existing, Future, and Future with Improvement conditions.

Project 22 evaluated Reservation Road between Beach Road to SR1. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from A to D. Under With Improvement Future conditions, project 22 will improve roadway operations to LOS A.

Project 23 evaluated Reservation Road between Imjin Road to Blanco Road. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from A to F. Under With Improvement Future conditions, project 23 will improve roadway operations to LOS C.

Project 24 evaluated new Airport Access Road from University Drive between Research Drive and Ramco access roadway. It is estimated that future development will increase the demand near the airport. Under With Improvement Future conditions, project 24 will have roadway operations at LOS A. 53 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
12 | Page
Table 9 – Roadway Capacity Level of Service Summary
Project #
Facility Type (# Lanes) LOS
Existing Project
Improvements Existing Future No
Project
Future With
Project

16. Del Monte (2nd Ave) between Reindollar
Ave. & Imjin Pkwy. - Collector (2) - - A

17. 8th St. between 3rd Ave. & Inter-Garrison
Rd. Collector (2) Arterial (4) A B A

18. Salinas Ave. between Reservation Rd. &
Carmel Ave Collector (2) Arterial (2) A A A

19. SR 1 Interchange at Imjin Pkwy. Collector (2) Arterial (8) A F A

20. Del Monte Blvd. between Beach Rd. to
Marina Greens Dr. Expressway (4) Expressway (4) A D A

21. SR 1 Interchange at Del Monte Blvd. Arterial (2) Arterial (4) B B B

22. Reservation Rd. between Beach Rd. to SR 1 Collector (2) Collector (2) A D A

23. Reservation Rd. between Imjin Rd. to
Blanco Rd. Arterial (4) Expressway (6) A F C

24. New Airport Access Road between
Research Dr and Ramco facility - Collector (2) - - A
Note: Roadways that operate at LOS E or F areBold.

Roadway Pedestrian and Bicycle
Roadway pedestrian and bicycle improvement analysis was conducted for Projects 25 and 26. The pedestrian level of comfort (LOC) and bicycle level of street (LTS) is summarized in Table 10 and Table 11, respectively.

Project 25 evaluated Reservation Road corridor between Del Monte Boulevard and California Avenue.

Project 25 will improve the LOC from 2 to 1 and LTS from 2 to 1 at majority of the corridor segments.

Project 26 evaluated Del Monte Boulevard between Reindollar Avenue and Reservation Road. Project 26 will improve the LOC from 2 to 1 and LTS from 2 to 1 at majority of the corridor segments. 54 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
13 | Page
Table 10 – Pedestrian Level of Comfort Summary
Project #
Without Project With Project
Min.

Pathway
Width
(ft)

DPL, SBL
or 2SBL?
Min.

Pathway
Buffer
(ft)
LOC
Min.

Pathway
Width
(ft)

DPL, SBL
or 2SBL?
Min.

Pathway
Buffer
(ft)
LOC

25. Reservation Road Corridor
Eastbound
Del Monte Bl to Vista Del Camino Cir 8 SBL 6 2 8 SBL ≥8 1 Vista Del Camino Cir to Crescent Av 10 DPL &
SBL 13 1 10 DPL &
SBL ≥8 1
Crescent Av to California St 10 DPL &
SBL 17 1 10 DPL &
SBL ≥8 1
Westbound
Del Monte Bl to Vista Del Camino Cir 8 DPL &
SBL 13 1 8 SBL ≥8 1
Vista Del Camino Cir to Crescent Av 8 EBL 12 1 8 SBL ≥8 1 Crescent Av to California St 10 DPL &
SBL 13 1 10 DPL &
SBL ≥8 1

26. Del Monte Boulevard Corridor
Northbound
Reindollar Av to Palm Av 9 No DPL
or SBL 8 2 9 SBL ≥8 1
Palm Av to Reservation Rd 9 No DPL
or SBL 9 2 9 SBL ≥8 1
Southbound
Reindollar Av to Palm Av 7 No DPL
or SBL 6 3 7 SBL ≥8 1
Palm Av to Reservation Rd 7 No DPL
or SBL 8 2 7 SBL ≥8 1
Note: LOC=Level of Comfort, DPL=Dedicated Parking Lane, SBL=Separated Bike Lane, 2SBL=Two-way Separated Bike Lane. 55 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
14 | Page
Table 11 – Bicycle Level of Stress Summary
Project #
Without Project With Project
# through
Lanes LTS # through
Lanes LTS

25. Reservation Road Corridor
Eastbound
Del Monte Bl to Vista Del Camino Cir 2 2 2 2
Vista Del Camino Cir to Crescent Av 2 2 1 2
Crescent Av to California St 2 2 1 2
Westbound
Del Monte Bl to Vista Del Camino Cir 2 2 2 1
Vista Del Camino Cir to Crescent Av 2 2 1 1
Crescent Av to California St 2 2 1 1

26. Del Monte Boulevard Corridor
Northbound
Reindollar Av to Palm Av 2 2 2 2
Palm Av to Reservation Rd 2 2 1 2
Southbound
Reindollar Av to Palm Av 2 2 2 1
Palm Av to Reservation Rd 2 2 1 1
Note: Assumed Separated bike lane with buffer & many driveways as project improvements.

Housing Analysis
As mentioned previously, AB 602 requires that studies either calculate a fee levied or imposed on a housing development projects proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units or make specified findings explaining why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate the fees. Simply, development impact fees must be stratified by the size of the housing unit or provide findings that support not stratifying the fees. In order to guide future analysis requirements and help inform the City of Marina as to how AB 602 may impact the TIF program in regard to the housing fee stratification requirement, an analysis was conducted to evaluate housing fees by housing size.

The analysis relied on cross-tabulation of the following three data sources:
· The average number vehicle trips generated by household size (i.e., number of persons in the household) derived from a Big Data platform (Replica) for a typical weekday (Thursday) in the Spring of 2023 which was the latest available data during this analysis 56 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
15 | Page
· The number of single-family housing units in categories of persons per household and square footage of units estimated from the 2021 US Census’ American Housing Survey (AHS) · Building permits by square footage for single family units constructed within the City of Marina and the surrounding areas between 2020 and 2023
The trip generation information was combined with the number of single-family detached units in cross- tabulated categories of persons per household and total household square footage. This resulted in e s t i m a t e s o f v e h i c l e t r i p r a t e s a n d e q u i v a l e n t d w e l l i n g u n i t s ( E D U s ) f o r e a c h s q u a r e f o o t a g e c a t e g o r y established as a part of this analysis. This data was combined with the square footage data for single-family housing units built in the City between 2020 and 2023. The housing size data was provided by the City and verified using real estate sales data available online on Zillow. The resultant dataset was used as the basis for evaluating whether future Nexus Study updates should consider square footage in the development of the fee schedule. The major analysis processes are discussed in detail in the following sections.

Replica Data
Replica is a big data platform that provides demographic and travel data based on multiple data collection sources such as mobile location data, merchant transaction data, census data, land use data, and observed “ground-truth” mobility data. Data from Replica’s Spring 2023 typical Thursday dataset for the City of Marina was used to estimate the number of vehicle trips by persons per household. Table 12 summarizes the trip generation rates for each household category.

Table 12 – City of Marina Trip Generation Data – Replica 2023 Persons per Household Households Trips Daily Home-Based Vehicle Trips
1 6,020 14,886 2.47
2 11,538 42,516 3.68
3 9,142 45,600 4.99
4 9,114 45,436 4.99
5 4,888 24,500 5.01
6 3,599 23,807 6.41
7+ 3,589 25,369 7.07
Total 47,890 221,394
Average 4.62
Source: Replica Spring 2023 Thursday Dataset.

American Housing Survey
The American Housing Survey (AHS), which is conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), collects data on the nation's housing, including data on household characteristics and demographics.

The AHS data is collected in odd numbered years only. The most recent available survey data from 2021 was used. The AHS was designed to include two samples, the National sample, and the independent 57 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
16 | Page
Metropolitan sample. The metropolitan areas that are surveyed and the size of the surveys have been reduced over recent years. While these measures have reduced costs, they also limit the localized data available.

As the AB 602 analysis requires trip generation to be defined by square footage, housing units were cross tabulated by three variables: structure type, square footage, and total persons in the household. This cross- tabulation requires an adequate sample size for each category. The closest available metropolitan area for the City of Marina region was the City of San Jose. However, the San Jose metropolitan area sample size limits its ability to provide information for all square-footage categories and may not be representative of housing in the City of Marina. In addition, the tools available from the Census Bur eau to create cro ss- tabulations from the AHS for the purposes of this analysis indicate that the only sample that can provide a statistically relevant sample for the three required variables is the full national sample. Thus, it was decided that the national sample from the 2021 AHS should be used to define the number of single-family housing units by persons per household and by the square footage of the housing unit. This data is summarized in Table 13.

Table 13 – No. of Single-Family Unit Detached Structures by AHS Square Foot Category Persons per
Household
Total
Units
<500
s.f.
500 to
749 s.f.
750 to
999 s.f.
1,000
to
1,499
s.f.
1,500
to
1,999
s.f.
2,000
to
2,499
s.f.
2,500
to
2,999
s.f.
3,000
to
3,999
s.f.
>4,000
s.f.

Size
Unknown
1 16,679 218 409 1,371 4,854 4,017 2,201 1,010 730 325 1,543 2 29,676 123 321 1,435 6,315 7,451 5,237 3,156 2,838 1,320 1,478 3 13,396 0 99 623 2,825 3,241 2,683 1,229 1,254 477 941 4 12,496 0 116 360 2,182 2,906 2,260 1,553 1,565 862 650 5 5,872 0 38 186 957 1,314 1,122 639 832 406 362
6 2,317 0 0 75 436 445 423 257 288 185 182
7+ 1,308 0 0 45 234 270 215 122 141 120 131
Average per
Household 2.67 1.36 2.04 2.26 2.46 2.62 2.79 2.86 3.05 3.20 2.60 Trip Generation by Categories of Square Footage
The number of trips by household size and persons per household, as well as the estimation of the average trip generation rate for each of the AHS square footage categories, are summarized in Table 14. The trip generation rates were estimated using the following steps:
· Multiply the trip generation rate for a category of “persons per household” estimated from Replica’s trip generation data (see Table 12 ) by the number of single-family units in each AHS square footage category for that same number of persons per household (seeTable 13) · Sum the number of trips generated by all households in an AHS square footage category and divide by the total number of households in that square footage category. 58 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
17 | Page
The differences in trip rates for each household categories shown in Table 14, along with data on recent housing square footages built in the City’s surrounding region, were used to establish the EDU for each AHS square footage category.

Table 14 – Daily Vehicle Trips for All Households in Each AHS Square Foot Category Persons per
Household
Total
Trips
<500
s.f.
500 to
749 s.f.
750 to
999 s.f.
1,000
to
1,499
s.f.
1,500
to
1,999
s.f.
2,000
to
2,499
s.f.
2,500
to
2,999
s.f.
3,000
to
3,999
s.f.
>4,000
s.f.

Size
Unknown
1 41,243 539 1,011 3,390 12,003 9,933 5,443 2,497 1,805 804 3,815 2 109,352 453 1,183 5,288 23,270 27,456 19,298 11,629 10,458 4,864 5,446 3 66,819 0 494 3,108 14,091 16,166 13,383 6,130 6,255 2,379 4,694 4 62,296 0 578 1,795 10,878 14,487 11,267 7,742 7,802 4,297 3,240 5 29,432 0 190 932 4,797 6,586 5,624 3,203 4,170 2,035 1,814 6 14,863 0 0 481 2,797 2,855 2,713 1,649 1,847 1,187 1,168 7+ 9,246 0 0 318 1,654 1,909 1,520 862 997 848 926
Average per
Household 4.08 2.91 3.52 3.74 3.90 4.04 4.19 4.23 4.36 4.44 3.99 Recent Housing Built in Surrounding Region
Table 15 groups available data for 112 “non-age-restricted” single-family dwelling units built in the City of Marina between 2020 and 2023 by their square footage. The data indicates that the average size of the single-family dwelling units built in that three-year period was 2,373 square feet. Based on the analysis completed, an EDU of 1.0 was established for the “middle grouping” of single-family units between 2,000 and 2,499 square feet in size (the group in which the cumulative percentage reaches 50-percent). Setting the 1.0 EDU at this group means that housing units smaller than 2,000 square-feet were given an EDU less than 1.0 and dwelling units that are larger than 2,499 square-feet were given an EDU greater than 1.0.

Table 15 – Single-Family Units Built in City of Marina’s Surrounding Region Square Feet Units Percent
Less than 1,000 SF 0 0%
1,000 – 1,499 SF 5 4%
1,500 – 1,999 SF 3 32%
2,000 – 2,499 SF 28 25%
2,500 – 2,999 SF 22 20%
3,000 – 3,999 SF 21 19%
More than 4,000 SF 0 0%
Total 112 100%
Average Square Footage of Single-Family Units 2,373 SF
59 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
18 | Page
Analysis Results
Table 16 summarizes the estimated EDUs for the five recommended single-family dwelling units grouped by their square footage. Note that Table 16 contains fewer groups than Table 15 as the trip generation for dwelling units smaller than 1500 square-feet have similar trip generation characteristics resulting in the same EDU value. Similarly, dwelling units larger than 3000 square-feet were also grouped together because of similar EDU values.

The EDU values summarized in Table 16 were calculated by dividing the average number of trips per household for each group by the average trips per household for the middle (2,000 to 2,499 square feet) group. Table 16 also summarizes the calculated weighted average EDU for each of the AHS square footage categories, which is estimated by multiplying the EDU for each category by the percentage of households in that category (from the 2020 – 2023 available housing data). This calculation shows that the weighted average EDU for “non-age restricted” single-family dwelling units is 1.00. Based on the analysis completed, there is evidence that daily trips are correlated to the square footage of existing residences within the City of Marina and a stratified fee structure based on square footage was established as part of the AB 602 compliant Nexus Fee Study.

Table 16 – Estimated EDUs for Single-Family Units by Square Foot Groupings Recommended Square
Footage Categories
Average Trip per
Household EDU1 Weighted Average EDU
Less than 1,500 SF 3.74 0.89 0.040
1,500 – 1,999 SF 4.19 1.00 0.250
2,000 – 2,499 SF 4.25 1.01 0.199
2,500 – 2,999 SF 4.46 1.07 0.200
More than 3,000 SF 4.06 0.97 0.311
Weighted Average of All Groups 1.000
1 Equals avg. trips per household for each grouping divided by the avg. trips per household for the prominent group (4.25). 60 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
19 | Page
Nexus Allocation and Fee Calculations
Determining Nexus is a two-step process which establishes the relationship between future needed improvements to the transportation network and future development within the same geography. First the allocation to users must be determined and second the fee based on user type is calculated. These steps identify the highest allowable fee that can be tied to the effects of development with the City.

Allocation to Users
Having previously identified the improvements needed to the transportation network, the cost of those improvements can be proportionally allocated to the users of these facilities. The AMBAG TDM and the citywide growth projections were used in determining the share of project costs that can actually be attributed to growth within the City.

The AMBAG TDM was used to identify traffic patterns within Marina and the surrounding region under both existing baseline conditions and future horizon year conditions. The traffic volume on each link of the model was captured and links associated with TIF projects were identified for further analysis. These two scenario comparisons on TIF Project links in the model allow for isolation of the anticipated growth on each link and the proportion of growth on those links relative to the overall traffic on that link was calculated.

Growth in the model encompasses trips that originate both within the City of Marina and the surrounding County. Therefore, the portion of growth attributable to local trips within the City was also isolated for each proje ct. Local trips ar e those trip s that have eith er an origin or destinatio n (or both) within the City of Marina. Non-local trips, those trips that are just passing-through, were excluded from the fee calculations.

T h i s w a s d o n e b y p r o p o r t i o n a l l y r e d u c i n g t h e e l i g i b l e c o s t f o r i n c l u s i o n i n t h e T I F p r o g r a m o f e a c h T I F project to the share of trips anticipated to use the projects that are local trips. The results of this reduction in eligible cost associated with the local trips analysis is shown in Table 17.

The scope of this analysis is limited to applications within the fee calculation for the Marina TIF and should not be extrapolated to represent the sizing, scope, or policy related to future transportation projects. The size and scope of TIF project is established through nexus and then subsequent allocatable fees are calculated.
61 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
20 | Page
Table 17 – Project Costs Eligible for TIF
ID Project Total Cost
Estimate % of New Local Trips Cost Eligible for TIF
1 2nd Avenue & Inter-Garrison Road $875,200 100% $875,200 2 Imjin Road & 8th Street $1,800,000 31% $552,200
3 California Drive & 8th Street $1,750,300 92% $1,607,500 4 Reservation Road & Salinas Avenue $2,438,600 100% $2,438,600 5 Imjin Parkway bridge @ SR 1 $41,400 25% $10,400
6 SR 1 Southbound off-ramp @ Imjin Parkway $3,182,400 25% $797,500 7 SR 1 Southbound on-ramp @ Imjin Parkway $795,600 25% $199,400 8 Del Monte Boulevard & Beach Road $3,182,400 99% $3,165,100 9 Imjin Parkway & 2nd Avenue $6,583,200 41% $2,687,600
10 Reservation Road & Del Monte Boulevard $4,000,000 100% $4,000,000 11 California Avenue & Marina Heights Drive $1,384,400 100% $1,384,400 12 SR1 Southbound Ramp @ Reservation Rd $4,000,000 16% $648,600 13 SR1 Northbound Ramp @ Reservation Road $4,000,000 95% $3,802,700 14 Cardoza Avenue & Reservation Road $3,500,000 95% $3,320,000 15 Del Monte Boulevard & Patton Parkway $6,000,000 30% $1,800,000 Total Cost for Intersection Projects $43,533,500 63% $27,289,200 16 Del Monte Boulevard Extension $17,000,000 100% $17,000,000 17 8th Street from California Ave to Inter-Garrison Rd $9,449,700 53% $4,989,200 18 Salinas Ave - Reservation Road to Carmel Ave $5,200,000 100% $5,200,000 19 Imjin Parkway & SR1 Interchange $24,385,300 31% $7,544,400 20 Del Monte Blvd - Beach Road to Marina Greens Dr $13,411,900 100% $13,390,600 21 Del Monte Boulevard & SR 1 Interchange $24,385,300 100% $24,385,300 22 Reservation Road – Beach Road to SR 1 $9,599,250 95% $9,130,100 23 Reservation Road - Imjin Road to Blanco Road $13,036,400 45% $5,872,100 24 Airport Access Road $6,190,000 30% $1,857,000
25 Reservation Rd – Del Monte Blvd to California St $31,174,100 30% $9,352,300 26 Del Monte Blvd – Reindollar Ave to Reservation Rd $16,258,700 30% $4,877,700 Total Cost for Roadway Projects $170,090,650 61% $103,598,700 Total Cost for Transportation Projects: $213,624,150 61% $130,887,900 62 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
21 | Page
Fee Calculations
The actual fee per trip were calculated by dividing the total eligible cost for all TIF projects by the total estimated growth in Daily trips on the roadway network at buildout of the City’s General Plan and Housing Element Update. These calculations also introduce a three percent (3.0%) administration charge for the fee program. T a b l e 1 8s h o w s t h i s c a l c u l a t i o n r e s u l t s i n a b a s e f e e p e r t r i p o f $ 5 8 0 . 9 1 a n d $ 2 , 1 3 6 . 5 6 f o r intersection and roadway projects, respectively. Table 19 then uses the adjusted daily trip demand factor to apply this fee across each land use type.

Table 18 – Calculation of Fee per Adjusted Daily Trip
Calculation Intersections Roadways Total
Cost Eligible for TIF $27,289,200 $103,598,700 $130,887,900 Administrative Fee (3% of total costs) $818,676 $818,676 $1,637,352 Total Impact Fee Revenue Allocated1 -$911,115 -$4,389,789 -$5,300,904 Subtotal Impact Fee Program Funding after
Contribution from Impact Fee $27,196,761 $100,027,587 $127,224,348 Growth in Adjusted Daily Trips 46,817 46,817 46,817
Fee per Trip $580.91 $2,136.56 $2,717.47
1 Total revenue allocation includes fairshare of fee collected as part of the TIF as of June 30, 2024 for development projects.

Table 19 – Fee per Land Use Category
Land Use Category Unit
Adjusted Daily
Trip Demand
Factor
Fee per Unit
Intersections
Fee per Unit
Roadways
Total
Fee per
Unit
Current
Fee per
Unit
Residential
Single Family DU 9.15 $5,314 $19,543 $24,857 $11,671
Senior Homes DU 4.18 $2,429 $8,932 $11,361 $4,513
Assisted Living – Senior DU 2.52 $1,465 $5,388 $6,853 $3,239 Multifamily DU 6.54 $3,798 $13,968 $17,766 $8,155
Nonresidential
Office/Research KSF 10.41 $6,045 $22,234 $28,279 $13,292 Retail/Service KSF 25.91 $15,050 $55,352 $70,401 $22,342 Industrial KSF 4.77 $2,772 $10,197 $12,969 $8,399
Hotel ROOM 7.67 $4,456 $16,388 $20,844 $9,846
Church KSF 6.92 $4,018 $14,776 $18,794 $10,978
Day Care Center KSF 40.95 $23,790 $87,499 $111,289 $89,257 Animal Hospital/Clinic KSF 21.07 $12,240 $45,017 $57,257 $56,884 Medical/Dental Office KSF 35.28 $20,495 $75,378 $95,872 $43,542 The fees presented here represent the maximum eligible fees attributable to new growth and development within the City of Marina and also serves as a ceiling to the fee schedule eventually adopted by the City Council.
63 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
22 | Page
As mentioned earlier, a stratified fee structure based on square footage for single family residential units was established as part of the AB 602 compliant Nexus Fee Study.Table 20 shows the adjusted fees for the single-family residential units for roadway and intersection projects.

Table 20 – Fee for Single Family Residential Land Use by Size Land Use Category Unit
Adjusted Daily
Trip Demand
Factor
Fee per Unit
Intersections
Fee per Unit
Roadways
Total
Fee per Unit
Single Family < 1500 SF DU 9.43 $4,742 $17,441 $22,184
Single Family 1,500 to 1,999 SF DU 9.43 $5,145 $18,922 $24,067 Single Family 2000 to 2,499 SF DU 9.43 $5,314 $19,543 $24,857 Single Family 2500 to 2,999 SF DU 9.43 $5,390 $19,825 $25,215 Single Family >=3,000 SF DU 9.43 $5,659 $20,815 $26,474 64 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
23 | Page
Required Program Elements
This report has provided a detailed discussion of the elements of the Marina Transportation Impact Fee program and explained the analytical techniques used to develop this nexus study. The report addresses the fee program elements required by Government Code 66000-66025, as summarized below.

1. Identifying the purpose of the fee
§ The purpose of the Marina Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) program is to provide funding for public infrastructure improvements that are needed to mitigate the transportation- related impacts of new development in Marina.

2. Identifying how the fee will be used and the facilities to be funded through the fee § The fee is used to help fund capital improvement projects that will accommodate future transportation needs throughout the City of Marina. Table 1 identifies the projects to be funded through the TIF fee.

3. Determining a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development on which the fee is imposed
§ As described in this report, different types of development generate traffic with different characteristics. The calculations presented in Table 5 account for these characteristics by calculating the travel-related characteristics of different land use types. These considerations account for the difference in impacts on the local transportation system generated by different land use types.

4. Determining a reasonable relationship between the need for the roadway and intersection improvements and the type of development on which the fee is imposed § The need for the facilities listed in Table 1 has been established through local planning processes prepared by the City of Marina and building upon the adopted General Plan and Housing Element Update.

5. Determining a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility (or portion of facility) attributable to new development § Fee Calculation Section of this report describes the calculations completed to determine the cost of the roadway and intersection projects that is attributable to new development in the TIF area. A reasonable effort has been made to quantitatively establish the relationship between the fees charged in the TIF program and the costs of improvements attributable to new development within the City of Marina. 65 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
24 | Page
Appendices
Appendix A: Level of Service Analysis Outputs
66 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
1: 2nd Ave & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 35
Intersection LOS D
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 11 128 20 106 695
Future Vol, veh/h 3 11 128 20 106 695
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 12 138 22 114 747
Number of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 0 2
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 0
HCM Control Delay 9.1 9 40.3

HCM LOS A A E
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 128 20 3 11 106 695
LT Vol 0 0 3 0 106 0
Through Vol 128 0 0 0 0 695
RT Vol 0 20 0 11 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 138 22 3 12 114 747
Geometry Grp 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.202 0.027 0.007 0.02 0.163 0.963
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.29 4.585 7.28 6.066 5.139 4.638 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 681 784 494 592 692 777
Service Time 2.997 2.293 4.994 3.779 2.916 2.415
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.203 0.028 0.006 0.02 0.165 0.961
HCM Control Delay 9.3 7.4 10 8.9 8.9 45.1
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A E
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 0.1 0 0.1 0.6 14.9
67 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh41.1
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 6 0 7 4 42 0 5 21 597 5 2
Future Vol, veh/h 11 6 0 7 4 42 0 5 21 597 5 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 12 6 0 8 4 45 0 5 23 642 5 2
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay 9.7 9.2 8.3 46.2

HCM LOS A A A E
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 99% 0%
Vol Thru, % 19% 0% 100% 0% 9% 1% 0%
Vol Right, % 81% 0% 0% 0% 91% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 26 11 6 7 46 602 2
LT Vol 0 11 0 7 0 597 0
Through Vol 5 0 6 0 4 5 0
RT Vol 21 0 0 0 42 0 2
Lane Flow Rate 28 12 6 8 49 647 2
Geometry Grp 4b 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.039 0.023 0.012 0.015 0.08 0.953 0.002 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.079 7.017 6.509 6.951 5.794 5.3 4.103 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 701 508 548 514 616 686 877
Service Time 3.136 4.783 4.274 4.706 3.548 3 1.803
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.024 0.011 0.016 0.08 0.943 0.002 HCM Control Delay 8.3 9.9 9.4 9.8 9.1 46.3 6.8
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A E A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.1 0 0 0.3 13.7 0
68 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 1 14 0 2 6 14 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 1 14 0 2 6 14 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 4 1 18 0 3 8 18 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1 0 0 19 28 1
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1 1 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 18 27 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1622 - - 998 865 1084
Stage 1 0 - - - - - 1022 895 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - - 1005 873 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1622 - - 996 0 1084
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 996 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1022 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1003 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 8.4

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - 7.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - -
69 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 135 732 0 2 872 25 0 0 0 165 0 470 Future Volume (veh/h) 135 732 0 2 872 25 0 0 0 165 0 470 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 144 779 0 2 928 27 0 0 0 176 0 500 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 175 1439 0 6 1094 32 0 892 0 224 10 544
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 1781 3526 103 0 1870 0 379 22 1139 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 144 779 0 2 468 487 0 0 0 676 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 1852 0 1870 0 1541 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.3 17.5 0.0 0.1 25.8 25.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.2 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.3 17.5 0.0 0.1 25.8 25.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.74
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 175 1439 0 6 551 574 0 892 0 778 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.54 0.00 0.35 0.85 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 238 1596 0 102 662 690 0 1162 0 1000 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.3 23.7 0.0 52.0 33.8 33.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 15.4 0.3 0.0 32.2 8.7 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.4 7.2 0.0 0.1 12.2 12.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.7 24.0 0.0 84.3 42.5 42.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E C A F D D A A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 923 957 0 676
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.9 42.5 0.0 32.1
Approach LOS C D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 53.9 4.3 46.4 53.9 14.3 36.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 6.0 47.0 65.0 14.0 39.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 2.1 19.5 44.7 10.3 27.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 6.0 5.2 0.1 4.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.2
HCM 6th LOS D
70 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh25.4
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 25 138 158 54 27 49 178 33 11 375 22 Future Vol, veh/h 31 25 138 158 54 27 49 178 33 11 375 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 36 29 160 184 63 31 57 207 38 13 436 26
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 15.6 19.3 19.3 37.6

HCM LOS C C C E
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 19% 16% 66% 3%
Vol Thru, % 68% 13% 23% 92%
Vol Right, % 13% 71% 11% 5%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 260 194 239 408
LT Vol 49 31 158 11
Through Vol 178 25 54 375
RT Vol 33 138 27 22
Lane Flow Rate 302 226 278 474
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.582 0.441 0.562 0.86
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.927 7.034 7.278 6.528
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 520 510 495 555
Service Time 4.987 5.099 5.338 4.58
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.581 0.443 0.562 0.854
HCM Control Delay 19.3 15.6 19.3 37.6
HCM Lane LOS C C C E
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.7 2.2 3.4 9.3
71 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 871 498 392 761 0 120 0 102 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 871 498 392 761 0 120 0 102 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 907 519 408 793 0 125 0 106 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 3 1701 758 588 2563 0 320 251 211 3 6 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.17 0.72 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1583 3456 3647 0 3456 1870 1574 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 907 519 408 793 0 125 0 106 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1583 1728 1777 0 1728 1870 1574 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 9.9 14.1 6.1 4.4 0.0 1.9 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 9.9 14.1 6.1 4.4 0.0 1.9 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1701 758 588 2563 0 320 251 211 3 6 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.53 0.69 0.69 0.31 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 193 2827 1259 1437 3919 0 562 1387 1167 193 2442 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 10.1 11.2 21.6 2.8 0.0 23.6 0.0 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 3.2 4.2 2.4 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 10.4 12.3 23.1 2.8 0.0 24.4 0.0 24.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A B B C A A C A C A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1426 1201 231 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.1 9.7 24.2 0.0
Approach LOS B A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 0.0 11.4 13.4 30.5 9.1 2.3 0.0 43.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 41.0 23.0 44.0 9.0 38.0 6.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 5.5 8.1 16.1 3.9 0.0 0.0 6.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 1.3 10.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.6
HCM 6th LOS B
72 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 235 123 338 122 162 95 165 229 225 277 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 235 123 338 122 162 95 165 229 225 277 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 17 270 141 389 140 186 109 190 263 259 318 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 25 407 222 679 367 304 155 401 589 407 877 14 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.09 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 136 2176 1188 3456 1870 1549 1781 1870 2744 3456 3580 56 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 234 0 194 389 140 186 109 190 263 259 158 165 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1864 0 1636 1728 1870 1549 1781 1870 1372 1728 1777 1859 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 0.0 6.2 5.7 3.7 6.2 3.4 5.0 4.7 4.0 4.1 4.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.6 0.0 6.2 5.7 3.7 6.2 3.4 5.0 4.7 4.0 4.1 4.2 Prop In Lane 0.07 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 349 0 306 679 367 304 155 401 589 407 435 456 V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.00 0.63 0.57 0.38 0.61 0.70 0.47 0.45 0.64 0.36 0.36 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 662 0 581 1841 997 825 949 997 1462 1227 1262 1321 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh21.3 0.0 21.1 20.5 19.6 20.7 25.0 19.3 19.2 23.7 17.6 17.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.0 2.2 0.8 0.6 2.0 5.7 0.9 0.5 1.7 0.5 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 0.0 2.3 2.2 1.5 2.2 1.5 2.0 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.5 0.0 23.3 21.2 20.3 22.6 30.6 20.2 19.7 25.4 18.1 18.1 LnGrp LOS C A C C C C C C B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 428 715 562 582
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.4 21.4 22.0 21.3
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.6 16.1 14.5 8.9 17.8 15.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 7.0 8.6 5.4 6.2 8.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 2.1 2.0 0.3 1.9 2.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.9
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
73 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 865 248 566 42 30 1327
Future Volume (veh/h) 865 248 566 42 30 1327
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 940 270 615 46 33 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1156 2806 739 626 311
Arrive On Green 0.33 0.79 0.39 0.39 0.09 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 940 270 615 46 33 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 16.6 1.2 19.7 1.2 0.6 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.6 1.2 19.7 1.2 0.6 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1156 2806 739 626 311
V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.10 0.83 0.07 0.11
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1973 4697 1292 1095 1765
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh20.2 1.6 18.2 12.5 27.8 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.1 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.3 0.1 8.1 0.4 0.2 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.7 1.6 20.7 12.6 28.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS C A C B C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1210 661 33
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.2 20.1 28.0
Approach LOS B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 56.6 10.0 26.3 30.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 38.0 46.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 2.6 18.6 21.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 0.1 3.7 4.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 74 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 115 146 17 61 616
Future Vol, veh/h 38 115 146 17 61 616
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 1 0 2 2 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 115 0 - 80 75 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 42 126 160 19 67 677
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 975 163 0 0 181 0
Stage 1 162 - - - - -
Stage 2 813 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 279 882 - - 1394 -
Stage 1 867 - - - - -
Stage 2 436 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 264 879 - - 1391 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 264 - - - - -
Stage 1 865 - - - - -
Stage 2 414 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.6 0 0.7

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 264 879 1391 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.158 0.144 0.048 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 21.2 9.8 7.7 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.6 0.5 0.2 -
75 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.5
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 12 16 83 8 19 7 87 15 14 319 0
Future Vol, veh/h 4 12 16 83 8 19 7 87 15 14 319 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 5 14 19 97 9 22 8 101 17 16 371 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8.5 9.6 9.1 13.2

HCM LOS A A A B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 12% 75% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 85% 38% 7% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 15% 50% 17% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 7 102 32 110 14 319
LT Vol 7 0 4 83 14 0
Through Vol 0 87 12 8 0 319
RT Vol 0 15 16 19 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 8 119 37 128 16 371
Geometry Grp 5 5 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.013 0.172 0.053 0.188 0.025 0.524
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.838 5.23 5.133 5.304 5.59 5.087 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 610 682 692 673 638 705
Service Time 3.602 2.993 3.207 3.362 3.34 2.837
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.174 0.053 0.19 0.025 0.526
HCM Control Delay 8.7 9.1 8.5 9.6 8.5 13.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.1 3.1
76 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 47.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 36 20 328 33 0 0 0 0 193 40 10
Future Vol, veh/h 0 36 20 328 33 0 0 0 0 193 40 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 250 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 41 23 377 38 0 0 0 0 222 46 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 64 0 0 847 856 38
Stage 1 - - - - - - 792 792 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 55 64 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1538 - 0 332 295 1034
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 446 401 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 968 842 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1538 - - 251 0 1034
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 251 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 446 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 731 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 7.4 117.6

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1538 - 261
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.245 - 1.07
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.1 - 117.6
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 - 11.4
77 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
15: SR 1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 228 0 0 335 218 11 0 108 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 14 228 0 0 335 218 11 0 108 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 4 4 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 225 - - - - 120 - - 25 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 15 245 0 0 360 234 12 0 116 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 599 0 - - - 0 753 874 245
Stage 1 - - - - - - 275 275 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 478 599 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 978 - 0 0 - - 377 288 794
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 771 683 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 624 490 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 978 - - - - - 371 0 794
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 371 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 759 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 623 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 10.7

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 371 794 978 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.032 0.146 0.015 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 15 10.3 8.7 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.5 0 - - -
78 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
16: Salinas Ave/Driveway & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 689 2 7 797 0 1 0 7 0 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 689 2 7 797 0 1 0 7 0 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 150 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 811 2 8 938 0 1 0 8 0 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 938 0 0 815 0 0 1300 1769 408 1362 1771 469 Stage 1 - - - - - - 815 815 - 954 954 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 485 954 - 408 817 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 726 - - 808 - 0 119 83 593 107 82 541 Stage 1 - - - - - 0 338 389 - 278 335 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 0 532 335 - 591 388 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 726 - - 806 - - 117 82 592 104 81 541 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 117 82 - 104 81 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 336 387 - 277 332 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 526 332 - 581 386 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 14.4 11.7

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 393 726 - - 806 - 541
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.002 - - 0.01 - 0.002
HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 10 - - 9.5 - 11.7
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - 0
79 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
18: Driveway/Cardoza Ave & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 38 295 3 10 422 24 6 0 20 70 0 124 Future Volume (veh/h) 38 295 3 10 422 24 6 0 20 70 0 124 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 40 314 3 11 449 26 6 0 21 74 0 132 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 99 1466 638 31 700 591 162 43 253 510 0 325
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.41 0.41 0.02 0.37 0.37 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1546 1781 1870 1579 140 210 1225 1385 0 1574 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 314 3 11 449 26 27 0 0 74 0 132 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1546 1781 1870 1579 1574 0 0 1385 0 1574 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 1.9 0.0 0.2 6.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 2.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 1.9 0.0 0.2 6.5 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22 0.78 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 99 1466 638 31 700 591 459 0 0 510 0 325 V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.21 0.00 0.35 0.64 0.04 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.41 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 701 7530 3277 485 3737 3154 1911 0 0 1858 0 1858 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.1 6.3 5.7 16.0 8.5 6.6 10.6 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 11.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.1 0.0 6.7 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.7 6.3 5.7 22.8 9.5 6.6 10.6 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 12.2 LnGrp LOS B A A C A A B A A B A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 357 486 27 206
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.6 9.6 10.6 11.8
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.8 4.6 17.6 10.8 5.8 16.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.0 9.0 70.0 39.0 13.0 66.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 2.2 3.9 4.4 2.7 8.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 2.3 1.1 0.0 3.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.4
HCM 6th LOS A
80 81
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
4: Highway 1 SB Ramp & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 835 0 0 0 437 33
Future Volume (vph) 835 0 0 0 437 33
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1780
Flt Permitted 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1780
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Adj. Flow (vph) 938 0 0 0 491 37
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 938 0 0 0 0 528
Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 8 1 6
Permitted Phases 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 63.1 37.5
Effective Green, g (s) 63.1 37.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.35
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1028 614
v/s Ratio Prot c0.53 c0.30
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.91 0.86
Uniform Delay, d1 20.3 33.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 12.0 11.6
Delay (s) 32.3 44.7
Level of Service C D
Approach Delay (s) 32.3 0.0 44.7
Approach LOS C A D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 36.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 108.6 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
82 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
8: 4th St & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 114 46 157 336 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 114 46 157 336 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Hourly flow rate (vph) 121 49 167 357 0 0
Pedestrians 12 2 7
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 1 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 177 856 154
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 177 856 154
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 88 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1399 286 890
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 170 524
Volume Left 0 167
Volume Right 49 0
cSH 1700 1399
Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 10
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.3
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 3.3
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
83 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
17: Imjin Rd & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 649 241 366 781 29 30
Future Volume (vph) 649 241 366 781 29 30
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91
Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3396 1770 3539 3342 1441
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 3396 1770 3539 3342 1441
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 690 256 389 831 31 32
RTOR Reduction (vph) 26 0 0 0 11 18
Lane Group Flow (vph) 920 0 389 831 32 2
Turn Type NA Prot NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 29.3 23.0 56.3 6.8 6.8
Effective Green, g (s) 29.3 23.0 56.3 6.8 6.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.32 0.79 0.10 0.10
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1399 572 2802 319 137
v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 c0.22 0.23
v/s Ratio Perm c0.01 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.66 0.68 0.30 0.10 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 16.9 20.9 2.0 29.4 29.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 3.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
Delay (s) 18.0 24.2 2.1 29.5 29.2
Level of Service B C A C C
Approach Delay (s) 18.0 9.1 29.4
Approach LOS B A C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 13.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 71.1 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
84 MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Existing 2023

AM)]
Output produced by SIDRA

INTERSECTION V
ersion: 9.1.1.200
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
Demand Flows
Arrival Flows
95% Back Of Queue
Mov
ID
T
urn
Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
f.

Stop Rate
A
ver
.

No. of
Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Del Monte Blvd
3 L2
All MCs
151

2.0 151

2.0 0.403

7.4 LOS
A

2.4 60.4

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.0
8 T1
All MCs
227

2.0 227

2.0 0.403

7.4 LOS
A

2.4 60.4

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.6
18 R2
All MCs
62 2.0
62 2.0

0.403

7.4 LOS
A

2.4 60.4

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.4
Approach
440

2.0 440

2.0 0.403

7.4 LOS
A

2.4 60.4

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.4
East: Beach Rd
1 L2
All MCs
162

2.0 162

2.0 0.417

9.1 LOS
A

2.3 59.4

0.64 0.51

0.69 30.1
6 T1
All MCs
133

2.0 133

2.0 0.417

9.1 LOS
A

2.3 59.4

0.64 0.51

0.69 30.7
16 R2
All MCs
66 2.0
66 2.0

0.417

9.1 LOS
A

2.3 59.4

0.64 0.51

0.69 30.4
Approach
360

2.0 360

2.0 0.417

9.1 LOS
A

2.3 59.4

0.64 0.51

0.69 30.4
North: Del Monte Blvd
7 L2
All MCs
77 2.0
77 2.0

0.654

15.0 LOS B

7.0 177.8

0.81 0.83

1.33 28.5
4 T1
All MCs
408

2.0 408

2.0 0.654

15.0 LOS B

7.0 177.8

0.81 0.83

1.33 28.9
14 R2
All MCs
67 2.0
67 2.0

0.654

15.0 LOS B

7.0 177.8

0.81 0.83

1.33 28.7
Approach
552

2.0 552

2.0 0.654

15.0 LOS B

7.0 177.8

0.81 0.83

1.33 28.8
W
est: Beach Rd
5 L2
All MCs
45 2.0
45 2.0

0.374

10.2 LOS B

1.8 47.0

0.69 0.64

0.79 30.2
2 T1
All MCs
82 2.0
82 2.0

0.374

10.2 LOS B

1.8 47.0

0.69 0.64

0.79 30.7
12 R2
All MCs
127

2.0 127

2.0 0.374

10.2 LOS B

1.8 47.0

0.69 0.64

0.79 30.5
Approach
255

2.0 255

2.0 0.374

10.2 LOS B

1.8 47.0

0.69 0.64

0.79 30.5
All V
ehicles
1607

2.0 1607

2.0 0.654

10.8 LOS B

7.0 177.8

0.67 0.58

0.87 30.1
85 SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Existing 2023

AM)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

ASSOCIA

TES INC
|
Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2
|
Created:

T
uesday
, May 14,
2024 4:07:47 PM
Project:
\\kimley
-
horn.com\ca_pls1\Project\SJC_TPT
O\City of Marina\097789003
-
Marina DIF\2023
Update\05 Design &
Analys
is\Sidra\Marina DIF 2023.
sip9
86 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
1: 2nd Ave & Inter-Garrison Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.4
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 66 223 11 52 191
Future Vol, veh/h 19 66 223 11 52 191
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 19 67 228 11 53 195
Number of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 0 2
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 0
HCM Control Delay 8.4 9.9 9.3

HCM LOS A A A
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 223 11 19 66 52 191
LT Vol 0 0 19 0 52 0
Through Vol 223 0 0 0 0 191
RT Vol 0 11 0 66 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 228 11 19 67 53 195
Geometry Grp 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.315 0.013 0.033 0.093 0.08 0.268
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.977 4.274 6.196 4.989 5.459 4.956 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 724 837 578 718 657 725
Service Time 2.703 2 3.931 2.723 3.185 2.683
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.315 0.013 0.033 0.093 0.081 0.269
HCM Control Delay 10 7.1 9.1 8.2 8.7 9.5
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 0 0.1 0.3 0.3 1.1
87 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.2
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 9 1 28 1 194 0 28 32 106 24 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 9 1 28 1 194 0 28 32 106 24 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 10 1 32 1 223 0 32 37 122 28 3
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay 8.2 8.9 8.6 10

HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 82% 0%
Vol Thru, % 47% 100% 90% 0% 1% 18% 0%
Vol Right, % 53% 0% 10% 0% 99% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 60 0 10 28 195 130 3
LT Vol 0 0 0 28 0 106 0
Through Vol 28 0 9 0 1 24 0
RT Vol 32 0 1 0 194 0 3
Lane Flow Rate 69 0 11 32 224 149 3
Geometry Grp 4b 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.097 0 0.017 0.051 0.278 0.234 0.004 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.048 5.391 5.321 5.659 4.458 5.632 4.519 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 708 0 672 634 807 637 790
Service Time 3.091 3.133 3.062 3.384 2.182 3.372 2.258
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.097 0 0.016 0.05 0.278 0.234 0.004 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.1 8.2 8.7 8.9 10.1 7.3
HCM Lane LOS A N A A A B A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0 0.1 0.2 1.1 0.9 0
88 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 10 1 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 10 1 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 13 1 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 0
Stage 1 - - - - - - 2 2 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 9 9 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1619 - - - - - 1009 884 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1021 894 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1014 888 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1619 - - - - - 1007 0 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1007 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1020 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1013 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 7.2

HCM LOS -
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 1619 - - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.001 - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 7.2 - - - - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - - - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - - - -
89 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 289 1122 0 1 870 60 0 0 0 27 0 210 Future Volume (veh/h) 289 1122 0 1 870 60 0 0 0 27 0 210 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 295 1145 0 1 888 61 0 0 0 28 0 214 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 365 2072 0 3 1281 88 0 392 0 90 17 293
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 1781 3373 232 0 1870 0 103 80 1400 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 295 1145 0 1 468 481 0 0 0 242 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 1828 0 1870 0 1583 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.2 11.6 0.0 0.0 12.9 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.2 11.6 0.0 0.0 12.9 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.88
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 365 2072 0 3 675 694 0 392 0 401 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.55 0.00 0.33 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1038 4505 0 183 1400 1440 0 1218 0 1090 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.1 7.5 0.0 29.1 15.2 15.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.3 0.2 0.0 52.9 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.0 3.3 0.0 0.1 4.8 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.4 7.7 0.0 82.0 16.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A A F B B A A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1440 950 0 242
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.5 16.6 0.0 22.9
Approach LOS B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.2 4.1 38.0 16.2 16.0 26.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.0 6.0 74.0 38.0 34.0 46.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 2.0 13.6 10.3 11.2 14.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 11.8 1.6 0.9 7.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.4
HCM 6th LOS B
90 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh11.9
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 43 36 56 19 26 58 185 123 36 164 42 Future Vol, veh/h 32 43 36 56 19 26 58 185 123 36 164 42 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 35 47 40 62 21 29 64 203 135 40 180 46
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 10.1 10.1 13.4 11.2

HCM LOS B B B B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 16% 29% 55% 15%
Vol Thru, % 51% 39% 19% 68%
Vol Right, % 34% 32% 26% 17%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 366 111 101 242
LT Vol 58 32 56 36
Through Vol 185 43 19 164
RT Vol 123 36 26 42
Lane Flow Rate 402 122 111 266
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.542 0.192 0.178 0.376
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.85 5.661 5.774 5.084
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 748 633 620 707
Service Time 2.85 3.708 3.823 3.117
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.537 0.193 0.179 0.376
HCM Control Delay 13.4 10.1 10.1 11.2
HCM Lane LOS B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.3 0.7 0.6 1.8
91 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1138 400 240 877 0 418 0 283 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1138 400 240 877 0 418 0 283 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1185 417 250 914 0 435 0 295 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 3 1697 755 357 2272 0 572 455 384 3 67 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.10 0.64 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1582 3456 3647 0 3456 1870 1577 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1185 417 250 914 0 435 0 295 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1582 1728 1777 0 1728 1870 1577 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 17.8 12.7 4.8 8.5 0.0 8.2 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 17.8 12.7 4.8 8.5 0.0 8.2 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1697 755 357 2272 0 572 455 384 3 67 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.70 0.55 0.70 0.40 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 157 2453 1092 558 2713 0 964 1373 1158 157 1931 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 13.9 12.6 29.5 6.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.5 0.6 2.5 0.1 0.0 2.1 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 6.3 4.1 2.0 2.5 0.0 3.4 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 14.5 13.3 32.0 6.1 0.0 29.2 0.0 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A B B C A A C A C A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1602 1164 730 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.2 11.7 28.4 0.0
Approach LOS B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 0.0 20.6 11.0 36.5 15.3 5.3 0.0 47.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 50.0 11.0 47.0 19.0 37.0 6.0 52.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 13.9 6.8 19.8 10.2 0.0 0.0 10.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.1 0.3 12.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 8.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.3
HCM 6th LOS B
92 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 189 83 303 222 209 112 226 566 224 119 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 189 83 303 222 209 112 226 566 224 119 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 199 87 319 234 220 118 238 596 236 125 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 25 311 139 749 405 328 157 543 780 364 1090 26 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 182 2285 1024 3456 1870 1512 1781 1870 2689 3456 3544 85 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 164 0 138 319 234 220 118 238 596 236 62 66 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1861 0 1630 1728 1870 1512 1781 1870 1344 1728 1777 1852 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 0.0 5.1 5.1 7.1 8.5 4.1 6.6 12.8 4.2 1.6 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 0.0 5.1 5.1 7.1 8.5 4.1 6.6 12.8 4.2 1.6 1.6 Prop In Lane 0.10 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 253 0 222 749 405 328 157 543 780 364 546 569 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.62 0.43 0.58 0.67 0.75 0.44 0.76 0.65 0.11 0.12 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 586 0 513 1631 883 714 841 883 1269 1088 1118 1166 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh26.0 0.0 25.9 21.5 22.3 22.8 28.3 18.3 20.6 27.3 15.8 15.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 0.0 2.9 0.4 1.3 2.4 7.1 0.6 1.6 1.9 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.0 2.1 2.0 3.1 3.0 2.0 2.7 3.8 1.7 0.6 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.8 0.0 28.8 21.9 23.6 25.2 35.4 18.9 22.2 29.2 15.9 15.9 LnGrp LOS C A C C C C D B C C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 302 773 952 364
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.8 23.3 23.0 24.5
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.7 22.4 12.6 9.6 23.5 17.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.2 14.8 7.3 6.1 3.6 10.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 3.6 1.4 0.3 0.7 3.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.1
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
93 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1101 538 323 28 38 956
Future Volume (veh/h) 1101 538 323 28 38 956
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1159 566 340 29 40 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1459 2638 461 391 382
Arrive On Green 0.42 0.74 0.25 0.25 0.11 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1159 566 340 29 40 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 15.8 2.7 9.1 0.8 0.6 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.8 2.7 9.1 0.8 0.6 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1459 2638 461 391 382
V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.21 0.74 0.07 0.10
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2609 5758 1481 1255 2163
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh13.6 2.1 18.8 15.7 21.7 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 2.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.3 0.3 3.8 0.3 0.2 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.7 2.2 21.2 15.8 21.9 0.0
LnGrp LOS B A C B C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1725 369 40
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.6 20.7 21.9
Approach LOS B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 44.3 10.0 26.9 17.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 41.0 43.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.7 2.6 17.8 11.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.5 0.1 5.1 2.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.5
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 94 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 63 318 33 64 197
Future Vol, veh/h 29 63 318 33 64 197
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 1 0 3 3 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 115 0 - 80 75 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 31 67 338 35 68 210
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 690 342 0 0 376 0
Stage 1 341 - - - - -
Stage 2 349 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 411 701 - - 1182 -
Stage 1 720 - - - - -
Stage 2 714 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 385 698 - - 1179 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 385 - - - - -
Stage 1 718 - - - - -
Stage 2 670 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.1 0 2

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 385 698 1179 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.08 0.096 0.058 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.2 10.7 8.2 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 0.3 0.2 -
95 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.6
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 11 4 53 23 100 11 144 26 9 102 4
Future Vol, veh/h 3 11 4 53 23 100 11 144 26 9 102 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 14 5 66 29 125 14 180 33 11 128 5
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8.3 9.5 10.1 9.3

HCM LOS A A B A
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 17% 30% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 85% 61% 13% 0% 96%
Vol Right, % 0% 15% 22% 57% 0% 4%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 11 170 18 176 9 106
LT Vol 11 0 3 53 9 0
Through Vol 0 144 11 23 0 102
RT Vol 0 26 4 100 0 4
Lane Flow Rate 14 212 22 220 11 132
Geometry Grp 5 5 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.022 0.304 0.032 0.282 0.018 0.196
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.762 5.15 5.062 4.618 5.843 5.312 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 619 695 702 777 610 672
Service Time 3.519 2.907 3.127 2.66 3.605 3.074
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 0.305 0.031 0.283 0.018 0.196
HCM Control Delay 8.6 10.2 8.3 9.5 8.7 9.4
HCM Lane LOS A B A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.2 0.1 0.7
96 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 42.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 85 35 214 94 0 0 0 0 244 0 40
Future Vol, veh/h 0 85 35 214 94 0 0 0 0 244 0 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 250 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 105 43 264 116 0 0 0 0 301 0 49
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 149 0 0 772 793 116
Stage 1 - - - - - - 644 644 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 128 149 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1432 - 0 368 321 936
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 523 468 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 898 774 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1432 - - ~ 300 0 936
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 300 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 523 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 733 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 5.6 101.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1432 - 332
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.184 - 1.056
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.1 - 101.3
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.7 - 12.7
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 97 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
15: SR 1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 296 0 0 304 253 39 0 331 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 27 296 0 0 304 253 39 0 331 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 10 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 225 - - - - 120 - - 25 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 28 302 0 0 310 258 40 0 338 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 570 0 - - - 0 797 928 302
Stage 1 - - - - - - 358 358 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 439 570 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 - 0 0 - - 356 268 738
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 707 628 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 650 505 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 - - - - - 346 0 738
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 346 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 687 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 650 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 14.2

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 346 738 1002 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.115 0.458 0.027 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.8 13.9 8.7 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 2.4 0.1 - - -
98 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
16: Salinas Ave/Driveway & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 770 8 8 678 0 3 0 10 0 0 5
Future Vol, veh/h 1 770 8 8 678 0 3 0 10 0 0 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 150 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 802 8 8 706 0 3 0 10 0 0 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 706 0 0 811 0 0 1174 1527 402 1125 1535 353 Stage 1 - - - - - - 805 805 - 722 722 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 369 722 - 403 813 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 888 - - 811 - 0 147 116 598 160 115 643 Stage 1 - - - - - 0 342 393 - 384 429 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 0 623 429 - 595 390 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 888 - - 810 - - 144 114 597 156 114 643 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 144 114 - 156 114 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 341 392 - 383 425 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 612 425 - 583 389 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 15.8 10.6

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 346 888 - - 810 - 643
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 0.001 - - 0.01 - 0.008
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.8 9.1 - - 9.5 - 10.6
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - 0
99 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
18: Driveway/Cardoza Ave & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 498 15 17 480 79 10 1 11 58 1 66 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 498 15 17 480 79 10 1 11 58 1 66 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 105 503 15 17 485 80 10 1 11 59 1 67 Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 188 1753 772 46 773 646 212 54 128 425 4 259 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.49 0.49 0.03 0.41 0.41 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1566 1781 1870 1562 451 323 773 1400 23 1561 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 105 503 15 17 485 80 22 0 0 59 0 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1566 1781 1870 1562 1546 0 0 1400 0 1584 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 3.2 0.2 0.4 7.8 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 3.2 0.2 0.4 7.8 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 1.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.50 1.00 0.99
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 188 1753 772 46 773 646 394 0 0 425 0 263 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.29 0.02 0.37 0.63 0.12 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 888 6622 2918 374 2945 2460 1651 0 0 1626 0 1621 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.2 5.7 4.9 18.3 8.8 6.9 13.4 0.0 0.0 13.8 0.0 13.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.1 0.0 4.8 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.8 5.8 5.0 23.1 9.7 7.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 13.9 0.0 14.4 LnGrp LOS B A A C A A B A A B A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 623 582 22 127
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 9.7 13.5 14.2
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 5.0 22.8 10.3 8.0 19.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.0 8.0 71.0 39.0 19.0 60.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 2.4 5.2 3.4 4.1 9.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 3.9 0.6 0.2 3.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.4
HCM 6th LOS A
100
101
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
4: Highway 1 SB Ramp & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 865 0 0 0 318 1
Future Volume (vph) 865 0 0 0 318 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 0.95
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1774
Flt Permitted 0.95 0.95
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1774
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 940 0 0 0 346 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 940 0 0 0 0 347
Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 8 1 6
Permitted Phases 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 52.6 23.7
Effective Green, g (s) 52.6 23.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.28
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1104 498
v/s Ratio Prot c0.53
v/s Ratio Perm 0.20
v/c Ratio 0.85 0.70
Uniform Delay, d1 12.7 27.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 6.5 4.2
Delay (s) 19.2 31.3
Level of Service B C
Approach Delay (s) 19.2 0.0 31.3
Approach LOS B A C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 84.3 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
102
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
8: 4th St & Inter-Garrison Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 240 41 75 139 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 240 41 75 139 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hourly flow rate (vph) 267 46 83 154 0 0
Pedestrians 19 5 21
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 2 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 334 650 316
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 334 650 316
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 93 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1225 397 721
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 313 237
Volume Left 0 83
Volume Right 46 0
cSH 1700 1225
Volume to Capacity 0.18 0.07
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 5
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.2
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 3.2
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
103
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
17: Imjin Rd & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1009 60 54 747 128 80
Future Volume (vph) 1009 60 54 747 128 80
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3509 1770 3539 3399 1441
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 3509 1770 3539 3399 1441
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adj. Flow (vph) 1085 65 58 803 138 86
RTOR Reduction (vph) 3 0 0 0 8 57
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1147 0 58 803 146 13
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Turn Type NA Prot NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 32.2 4.7 41.4 12.0 12.0
Effective Green, g (s) 32.2 4.7 41.4 12.0 12.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.08 0.66 0.19 0.19
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1810 133 2347 653 277
v/s Ratio Prot c0.33 0.03 c0.23
v/s Ratio Perm c0.04 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.63 0.44 0.34 0.22 0.05
Uniform Delay, d1 10.9 27.6 4.6 21.3 20.5
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 2.3 0.1 0.2 0.1
Delay (s) 11.6 29.9 4.7 21.4 20.6
Level of Service B C A C C
Approach Delay (s) 11.6 6.4 21.2
Approach LOS B A C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 62.4 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
104

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Existing 2023 PM)] Output produced by SIDRA

INTERSECTION V
ersion: 9.1.1.200
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
Demand Flows
Arrival Flows
95% Back Of Queue
Mov
ID
T
urn
Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
f.

Stop Rate
A
ver
.

No. of
Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Del Monte Blvd
3 L2
All MCs
173

2.0 173

2.0 0.418

7.6 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.49 0.28

0.49 30.9
8 T1
All MCs
230

2.0 230

2.0 0.418

7.6 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.4
18 R2
All MCs
57 2.0
57 2.0

0.418

7.6 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.2
Approach
460

2.0 460

2.0 0.418

7.6 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.2
East: Beach Rd
1 L2
All MCs
21 2.0
21 2.0

0.157

6.0 LOS
A

0.7 16.7

0.54 0.43

0.54 32.0
6 T1
All MCs
68 2.0
68 2.0

0.157

6.0 LOS
A

0.7 16.7

0.54 0.43

0.54 32.6
16 R2
All MCs
40 2.0
40 2.0

0.157

6.0 LOS
A

0.7 16.7

0.54 0.43

0.54 32.4
Approach
129

2.0 129

2.0 0.157

6.0 LOS
A

0.7 16.7

0.54 0.43

0.54 32.5
North: Del Monte Blvd
7 L2
All MCs
44 2.0
44 2.0

0.263

6.0 LOS
A

1.3 32.9

0.47 0.30

0.47 32.0
4 T1
All MCs
167

2.0 167

2.0 0.263

6.0 LOS
A

1.3 32.9

0.47 0.30

0.47 32.6
14 R2
All MCs
59 2.0
59 2.0

0.263

6.0 LOS
A

1.3 32.9

0.47 0.30

0.47 32.3
Approach
270

2.0 270

2.0 0.263

6.0 LOS
A

1.3 32.9

0.47 0.30

0.47 32.4
W
est: Beach Rd
5 L2
All MCs
67 2.0
67 2.0

0.280

6.1 LOS
A

1.4 36.1

0.45 0.27

0.45 31.9
2 T1
All MCs
85 2.0
85 2.0

0.280

6.1 LOS
A

1.4 36.1

0.45 0.27

0.45 32.4
12 R2
All MCs
145

2.0 145

2.0 0.280

6.1 LOS
A

1.4 36.1

0.45 0.27

0.45 32.2
Approach
297

2.0 297

2.0 0.280

6.1 LOS
A

1.4 36.1

0.45 0.27

0.45 32.2
All V
ehicles
1 156

2.0 1
156

2.0 0.418

6.6 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.48 0.30

0.48 31.9
105

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Existing 2023 PM)] New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

ASSOCIA

TES INC
|
Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2
|
Created:

T
uesday
, May 14,
2024 4:30:46 PM
Project:
\\kimley
-
horn.com\ca_pls1\Project\SJC_TPT
O\City of Marina\097789003
-
Marina DIF\2023
Update\05 Design &
Analys
is\Sidra\Marina DIF 2023.
sip9
106
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 1: 2nd Ave & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 129.9
Intersection LOS F
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 15 161 95 180 939
Future Vol, veh/h 12 15 161 95 180 939
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 13 16 173 102 194 1010
Number of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 0 2
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 0
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.3 9.9 160.2

HCM LOS B A F
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 161 95 12 15 180 939
LT Vol 0 0 12 0 180 0
Through Vol 161 0 0 0 0 939
RT Vol 0 95 0 15 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 173 102 13 16 194 1010
Geometry Grp 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.263 0.136 0.027 0.028 0.289 1.366
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.804 5.098 8.119 6.896 5.373 4.872 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 623 708 444 522 672 747
Service Time 3.504 2.798 5.819 4.596 3.089 2.587
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.278 0.144 0.029 0.031 0.289 1.352
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.6 8.6 11 9.8 10.3 188.9
HCM Lane LOS B A B A B F
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 1.2 42.6
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 107
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh42.1
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 8 0 1 36 24 0 19 9 608 11 527
Future Vol, veh/h 97 8 0 1 36 24 0 19 9 608 11 527
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 104 9 0 1 39 26 0 20 10 654 12 567
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh12.5 10.8 9.4 47.3

HCM LOS B B A E
Lane NBLn1EBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 98% 0%
Vol Thru, % 68% 0% 100% 0% 60% 2% 0%
Vol Right, % 32% 0% 0% 0% 40% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 28 97 8 1 60 619 527
LT Vol 0 97 0 1 0 608 0
Through Vol 19 0 8 0 36 11 0
RT Vol 9 0 0 0 24 0 527
Lane Flow Rate 30 104 9 1 65 666 567
Geometry Grp 4b 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.05 0.222 0.017 0.002 0.125 1.049 0.705 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.054 7.78 7.271 7.885 7.088 5.674 4.478 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 595 464 495 457 509 639 799
Service Time 4.054 5.48 4.971 5.585 4.788 3.446 2.249
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.05 0.224 0.018 0.002 0.128 1.042 0.71 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.4 12.7 10.1 10.6 10.8 72.7 17.4 HCM Lane LOS A B B B B F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.8 0.1 0 0.4 17.7 6
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 108
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 206 17 0 0 8 12 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 206 17 0 0 8 12 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 4 268 22 0 0 10 16 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1 0 0 288 299 1
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1 1 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 287 298 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1622 - - 702 613 1084
Stage 1 0 - - - - - 1022 895 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - - 762 667 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1622 - - 700 0 1084
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 700 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1022 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 760 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0.1 8.4

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 - - 7.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 109
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 126 828 0 2 1638 54 0 0 0 197 0 439 Future Volume (veh/h) 126 828 0 2 1638 54 0 0 0 197 0 439 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 134 881 0 2 1743 57 0 0 0 210 0 467 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 162 1496 0 6 1172 38 0 885 0 260 5 499
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.47 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 1781 3512 114 0 1870 0 464 10 1055 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 134 881 0 2 878 922 0 0 0 677 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 1850 0 1870 0 1529 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.6 22.3 0.0 0.1 39.0 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.8 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.6 22.3 0.0 0.1 39.0 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.69
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 162 1496 0 6 593 617 0 885 0 764 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.59 0.00 0.35 1.48 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 213 1496 0 91 593 617 0 1040 0 890 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.3 26.0 0.0 58.1 39.0 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.3 0.6 0.0 32.5 225.8 230.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 9.4 0.0 0.1 53.9 56.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 70.5 26.7 0.0 90.6 264.7 269.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E C F F F D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1015 1802 0 677
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.4 267.0 0.0 38.8
Approach LOS C F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 59.3 4.4 53.2 59.3 14.6 43.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 6.0 47.0 65.0 14.0 39.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 2.1 24.3 50.9 10.6 41.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 6.6 4.4 0.1 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 154.7
HCM 6th LOS F
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 110
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh26.3
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 25 137 162 56 29 50 177 34 13 372 24 Future Vol, veh/h 32 25 137 162 56 29 50 177 34 13 372 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 37 29 159 188 65 34 58 206 40 15 433 28
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh15.8 20.2 19.7 39.3

HCM LOS C C C E
Lane NBLn1EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1
Vol Left, % 19% 16% 66% 3%
Vol Thru, % 68% 13% 23% 91%
Vol Right, % 13% 71% 12% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 261 194 247 409
LT Vol 50 32 162 13
Through Vol 177 25 56 372
RT Vol 34 137 29 24
Lane Flow Rate 303 226 287 476
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.59 0.446 0.584 0.871
Departure Headway (Hd) 7 7.116 7.317 6.592
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 513 505 491 547
Service Time 5.067 5.186 5.382 4.648
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.591 0.448 0.585 0.87
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 19.7 15.8 20.2 39.3
HCM Lane LOS C C C E
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.8 2.3 3.7 9.6
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 111
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 947 560 500 1267 0 206 0 133 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 947 560 500 1267 0 206 0 133 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 986 583 521 1320 0 215 0 139 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 3 1719 766 675 2624 0 315 268 225 3 5 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.20 0.74 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1583 3456 3647 0 3456 1870 1575 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 986 583 521 1320 0 215 0 139 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1583 1728 1777 0 1728 1870 1575 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 13.4 20.3 9.6 10.4 0.0 4.1 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 13.4 20.3 9.6 10.4 0.0 4.1 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1719 766 675 2624 0 315 268 225 3 5 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.57 0.76 0.77 0.50 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 158 2316 1032 1177 3211 0 461 1136 957 158 2001 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 12.4 14.2 25.7 3.7 0.0 29.7 0.0 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 2.3 1.9 0.1 0.0 2.6 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 4.7 6.8 3.9 2.2 0.0 1.7 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 12.8 16.6 27.6 3.8 0.0 32.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B C A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1569 1841 354 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.2 10.6 31.4 0.0
Approach LOS B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s0.0 13.7 17.2 36.7 10.2 3.5 0.0 53.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s6.0 41.0 23.0 44.0 9.0 38.0 6.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 7.6 11.6 22.3 6.1 0.0 0.0 12.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.4 1.5 10.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 14.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 14.0
HCM 6th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 112
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 237 106 224 166 232 146 268 206 579 595 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 30 237 106 224 166 232 146 268 206 579 595 21 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 34 272 122 257 191 267 168 308 237 666 684 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 44 360 169 754 408 339 211 390 573 756 1083 38 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.12 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 272 2211 1037 3456 1870 1552 1781 1870 2743 3456 3501 123 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 232 0 196 257 191 267 168 308 237 666 347 361 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1857 0 1663 1728 1870 1552 1781 1870 1371 1728 1777 1847 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.0 0.0 9.3 5.2 7.4 13.6 7.7 13.0 6.3 15.6 14.0 14.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.0 0.0 9.3 5.2 7.4 13.6 7.7 13.0 6.3 15.6 14.0 14.0 Prop In Lane 0.15 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 302 0 271 754 408 339 211 390 573 756 550 571 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.72 0.34 0.47 0.79 0.80 0.79 0.41 0.88 0.63 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 444 0 398 1240 671 557 639 671 984 827 850 884 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh33.5 0.0 33.2 27.6 28.4 30.8 35.9 31.3 28.6 31.6 24.8 24.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.8 0.0 3.6 0.3 0.8 4.1 6.8 3.6 0.5 10.2 1.2 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.8 0.0 3.9 2.1 3.3 5.3 3.6 6.0 2.0 7.3 5.8 6.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 38.3 0.0 36.9 27.9 29.3 34.9 42.6 34.9 29.1 41.8 26.0 25.9 LnGrp LOS D D C C C D C C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 428 715 713 1374
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.6 30.9 34.8 33.7
Approach LOS D C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s22.3 21.4 17.6 13.9 29.9 22.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s17.6 15.0 12.0 9.7 16.0 15.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 2.4 1.6 0.4 4.4 2.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 33.8
HCM 6th LOS C
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 113
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1156 251 1788 127 27 1502
Future Volume (veh/h) 1156 251 1788 127 27 1502
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1257 273 1943 138 29 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1287 3066 843 715 203
Arrive On Green 0.37 0.86 0.45 0.45 0.06 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1257 273 1943 138 29 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 36.6 1.2 46.0 5.3 0.8 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 36.6 1.2 46.0 5.3 0.8 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h1287 3066 843 715 203
V/C Ratio(X) 0.98 0.09 2.30 0.19 0.14
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1287 3066 843 715 1152
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh31.6 1.0 28.0 16.8 45.6 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 19.6 0.0 590.3 0.1 0.3 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln18.2 0.1 157.8 1.9 0.4 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 51.1 1.1 618.3 17.0 45.9 0.0
LnGrp LOS D A F B D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1530 2081 29
Approach Delay, s/veh 42.2 578.4 45.9
Approach LOS D F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 92.0 10.0 42.0 50.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 38.0 46.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 2.8 38.6 48.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 348.8
HCM 6th LOS F
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 114
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 127 145 27 57 620
Future Vol, veh/h 61 127 145 27 57 620
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 1 0 2 2 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 115 0 - 80 75 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 67 140 159 30 63 681
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 970 162 0 0 191 0
Stage 1 161 - - - - -
Stage 2 809 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 281 883 - - 1383 -
Stage 1 868 - - - - -
Stage 2 438 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 267 880 - - 1380 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 267 - - - - -
Stage 1 866 - - - - -
Stage 2 417 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v14.1 0 0.7

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 267 880 1380 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.251 0.159 0.045 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 22.9 9.9 7.7 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 1 0.6 0.1 -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 115
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 130.4
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 9 18 175 12 58 4 98 10 22 730 0
Future Vol, veh/h 6 9 18 175 12 58 4 98 10 22 730 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 10 21 203 14 67 5 114 12 26 849 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.9 16.3 11.5 190.6

HCM LOS B C B F
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 18% 71% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 91% 27% 5% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 9% 55% 24% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 4 108 33 245 22 730
LT Vol 4 0 6 175 22 0
Through Vol 0 98 9 12 0 730
RT Vol 0 10 18 58 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 5 126 38 285 26 849
Geometry Grp 5 5 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.009 0.224 0.07 0.486 0.045 1.374
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.459 6.879 7.386 6.909 6.335 5.828 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 483 525 488 524 568 628
Service Time 5.159 4.579 5.386 4.909 4.042 3.535
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 0.24 0.078 0.544 0.046 1.352
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.2 11.6 10.9 16.3 9.3 196.1
HCM Lane LOS B B B C A F
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.9 0.2 2.6 0.1 37.4
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 116
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 43.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 45 28 319 41 0 0 0 0 184 43 16
Future Vol, veh/h 0 45 28 319 41 0 0 0 0 184 43 16
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 250 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 52 32 367 47 0 0 0 0 211 49 18
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 84 0 0 851 865 47
Stage 1 - - - - - - 781 781 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 70 84 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1513 - 0 330 292 1022
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 451 405 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 953 825 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1513 - - 250 0 1022
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 250 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 451 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 721 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 7.2 110.6

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1513 - 266
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.242 - 1.05
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 8.1 - 110.6
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 1 - 11.1
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 117
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 15: SR 1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 73 180 0 0 289 340 57 0 156 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 73 180 0 0 289 340 57 0 156 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 4 4 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 225 - - - - 120 - - 25 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 78 194 0 0 311 366 61 0 168 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 682 0 - - - 0 845 1032 194
Stage 1 - - - - - - 350 350 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 495 682 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 911 - 0 0 - - 333 233 847
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 713 633 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 613 450 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 911 - - - - - 304 0 847
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 304 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 652 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 612 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.7 0 12.8

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 304 847 911 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.202 0.198 0.086 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 19.8 10.3 9.3 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.7 0.7 0.3 - - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 118
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 16: Salinas Ave/Driveway & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 971 11 25 795 0 3 0 20 0 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 971 11 25 795 0 3 0 20 0 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 150 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 1142 13 29 935 0 4 0 24 0 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 935 0 0 1157 0 0 1672 2139 573 1566 2152 468 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1146 1146 - 993 993 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 526 993 - 573 1159 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 728 - - 600 - 0 63 48 463 75 47 542
Stage 1 - - - - - 0 212 272 - 263 322 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 0 503 322 - 472 268 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 728 - - 599 - - 60 45 462 68 44 542
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 60 45 - 68 44 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 211 270 - 262 307 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 478 307 - 446 266 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0.3 21.4 11.7

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 247 728 - - 599 - 542
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.11 0.002 - - 0.049 - 0.002
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 21.4 10 - - 11.3 - 11.7
HCM Lane LOS C A - - B - B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.4 0 - - 0.2 - 0
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 119
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 18: Driveway/Cardoza Ave & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 39 289 7 6 432 23 7 0 19 77 0 159 Future Volume (veh/h) 39 289 7 6 432 23 7 0 19 77 0 159 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 41 307 7 6 460 24 7 0 20 82 0 169
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 101 1507 656 17 705 595 172 48 247 513 0 337 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.38 0.38 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1546 1781 1870 1579 181 222 1154 1387 0 1574 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 41 307 7 6 460 24 27 0 0 82 0 169
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1546 1781 1870 1579 1558 0 0 1387 0 1574 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 1.9 0.1 0.1 6.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 1.9 0.1 0.1 6.9 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 3.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.74 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 101 1507 656 17 705 595 466 0 0 513 0 337 V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.20 0.01 0.35 0.65 0.04 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 680 7304 3179 471 3625 3059 1829 0 0 1804 0 1802 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.5 6.2 5.7 16.8 8.8 6.7 10.7 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 11.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.1 0.0 11.5 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 2.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.1 6.2 5.7 28.2 9.8 6.7 10.8 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 13.0 LnGrp LOS B A A C A A B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 355 490 27 251
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.6 9.9 10.8 12.4
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 4.3 18.4 11.3 5.9 16.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.0 9.0 70.0 39.0 13.0 66.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 2.1 3.9 5.2 2.8 8.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 2.3 1.4 0.0 3.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 9.7
HCM 6th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 120
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 4: Highway 1 SB Ramp & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1356 0 0 0 437 33
Future Volume (vph) 1356 0 0 0 437 33
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1780
Flt Permitted 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1780
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Adj. Flow (vph) 1524 0 0 0 491 37
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1524 0 0 0 0 528
Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 8 1 6
Permitted Phases 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 77.2 40.4
Effective Green, g (s) 77.2 40.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.32
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1087 572
v/s Ratio Prot c0.86 c0.30
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 1.40 0.92
Uniform Delay, d1 24.2 41.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 186.5 20.6
Delay (s) 210.7 61.7
Level of Service F E
Approach Delay (s/veh) 210.7 0.0 61.7
Approach LOS F A E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 172.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.24
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 125.6 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 121
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 8: 4th St & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 148 57 146 691 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 148 57 146 691 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Hourly flow rate (vph) 157 61 155 735 0 0
Pedestrians 12 2 7
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 1 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 225 1252 197
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 225 1252 197
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 88 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1344 166 843
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 218 890
Volume Left 0 155
Volume Right 61 0
cSH 1700 1344
Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 10
Control Delay (s/veh) 0.0 2.7
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.0 2.7
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.2
Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 122
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 17: Imjin Rd & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 742 213 1263 1524 56 121
Future Volume (vph) 742 213 1263 1524 56 121
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91
Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3421 1770 3539 3254 1441
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 3421 1770 3539 3254 1441
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 789 227 1344 1621 60 129
RTOR Reduction (vph) 19 0 0 0 60 59
Lane Group Flow (vph) 997 0 1344 1621 65 5
Turn Type NA Prot NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 35.9 40.3 80.2 7.5 7.5
Effective Green, g (s) 35.9 40.3 80.2 7.5 7.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.42 0.84 0.08 0.08
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1283 745 2965 255 112
v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 c0.76 0.46
v/s Ratio Perm c0.02 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.78 1.80 0.55 0.26 0.04
Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 27.7 2.3 41.5 40.8
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 367.2 0.2 0.5 0.2
Delay (s) 29.4 394.9 2.5 42.0 41.0
Level of Service C F A D D
Approach Delay (s/veh) 29.4 180.4 41.6
Approach LOS C F D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 137.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.22
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.7 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 123

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Future 2045 No Improvements AM)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
Demand
Flows
Arrival
Flows
95% Back Of
Queue
Mov
ID
Turn Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Eff.

Stop
Rate
Aver.

No. of
Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Del Monte Blvd
3 L2 All MCs 165 2.0 165 2.0 0.496 8.8 LOS A 3.3 83.6 0.56 0.33 0.56 30.5 8 T1 All MCs 308 2.0 308 2.0 0.496 8.8 LOS A 3.3 83.6 0.56 0.33 0.56 31.1 18 R2 All MCs 67 2.0 67 2.0 0.496 8.8 LOS A 3.3 83.6 0.56 0.33 0.56 30.8 Approach 540 2.0 540 2.0 0.496 8.8 LOS A 3.3 83.6 0.56 0.33 0.56 30.9 East: Beach Rd
1 L2 All MCs 180 2.0 180 2.0 0.403 9.7 LOS A 2.2 55.8 0.67 0.59 0.78 29.7 6 T1 All MCs 79 2.0 79 2.0 0.403 9.7 LOS A 2.2 55.8 0.67 0.59 0.78 30.2 16 R2 All MCs 52 2.0 52 2.0 0.403 9.7 LOS A 2.2 55.8 0.67 0.59 0.78 30.0 Approach 311 2.0 311 2.0 0.403 9.7 LOS A 2.2 55.8 0.67 0.59 0.78 29.8 North: Del Monte Blvd
7 L2 All MCs 96 2.0 96 2.0 1.367 184.4 LOS F 117.1 2975.0 1.00 4.39 9.57 9.1 4 T1 All MCs 998 2.0 998 2.0 1.367 184.4 LOS F 117.1 2975.0 1.00 4.39 9.57 9.1 14 R2 All MCs 87 2.0 87 2.0 1.367 184.4 LOS F 117.1 2975.0 1.00 4.39 9.57 9.1 Approach 1181 2.0 1181 2.0 1.367 184.4 LOS F 117.1 2975.0 1.00 4.39 9.57 9.1 West: Beach Rd
5 L2 All MCs 62 2.0 62 2.0 0.824 37.5 LOS E 6.8 171.5 0.91 1.20 1.90 22.1 2 T1 All MCs 81 2.0 81 2.0 0.824 37.5 LOS E 6.8 171.5 0.91 1.20 1.90 22.4 12 R2 All MCs 249 2.0 249 2.0 0.824 37.5 LOS E 6.8 171.5 0.91 1.20 1.90 22.2 Approach 393 2.0 393 2.0 0.824 37.5 LOS E 6.8 171.5 0.91 1.20 1.90 22.2 All Vehicles 2425 2.0 2425 2.0 1.367 99.1 LOS F 117.1 2975.0 0.85 2.48 5.20 13.9 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Const raint
effects.

HCM LOS A B B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 259 27 63 101 73 294
LT Vol 0 0 63 0 73 0
Through Vol 259 0 0 0 0 294
RT Vol 0 27 0 101 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 264 28 64 103 74 300
Geometry Grp 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.396 0.036 0.118 0.155 0.12 0.441
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.388 4.682 6.628 5.416 5.794 5.29 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 663 757 537 655 615 675
Service Time 3.162 2.455 4.418 3.205 3.565 3.06
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.398 0.037 0.119 0.157 0.12 0.444
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 11.7 7.6 10.3 9.2 9.4 12.2
HCM Lane LOS B A B A A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.9 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.4 2.3
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 125
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh17.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 144 44 0 0 486 0 130 0 10 9 80
Future Vol, veh/h 0 144 44 0 0 486 0 130 0 10 9 80
Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 166 51 0 0 559 0 149 0 11 10 92
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh11.9 22.9 12.6 10.1

HCM LOS B C B B
Lane NBLn1EBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 53% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 100% 77% 100% 0% 47% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 23% 0% 100% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 130 0 188 0 486 19 80
LT Vol 0 0 0 0 0 10 0
Through Vol 130 0 144 0 0 9 0
RT Vol 0 0 44 0 486 0 80
Lane Flow Rate 149 0 216 0 559 22 92
Geometry Grp 4b 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.284 0 0.355 0 0.776 0.044 0.158
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.832 6.078 5.912 5.709 5.002 7.172 6.188 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 524 0 605 0 721 497 577
Service Time 4.9 3.839 3.672 3.456 2.748 4.944 3.959
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.284 0 0.357 0 0.775 0.044 0.159
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 12.6 8.8 11.9 8.5 22.9 10.3 10.1 HCM Lane LOS B N B N C B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.2 0 1.6 0 7.5 0.1 0.6
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 126
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 0 0 12 0 1 0 9 0 21 4 9
Future Vol, veh/h 7 0 0 12 0 1 0 9 0 21 4 9
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 9 0 0 16 0 1 0 12 0 28 5 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 1 0 0 0 0 0 52 51 0
Stage 1 - - - - - - 18 18 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 34 33 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1622 - - - - - 957 840 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1005 880 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 988 868 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1622 - - - - - 950 0 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 950 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 999 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 987 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 7.2

HCM LOS -
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 1622 - - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - 7.2 - - - - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - - - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0 - - - - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 127
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 324 1867 0 13 1268 62 0 0 0 30 0 223 Future Volume (veh/h) 324 1867 0 13 1268 62 0 0 0 30 0 223 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 331 1905 0 13 1294 63 0 0 0 31 0 228 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 375 2326 0 33 1594 77 0 373 0 67 14 277
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.65 0.00 0.02 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 1781 3449 168 0 1870 0 119 70 1390 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 331 1905 0 13 666 691 0 0 0 259 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 1840 0 1870 0 1579 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.9 37.5 0.0 0.7 30.3 30.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.9 37.5 0.0 0.7 30.3 30.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.88
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 375 2326 0 33 821 850 0 373 0 358 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.82 0.00 0.40 0.81 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 645 2801 0 114 871 901 0 757 0 678 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.9 12.1 0.0 45.6 21.7 21.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.4 1.7 0.0 7.6 5.6 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.0 13.1 0.0 0.4 13.1 13.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 43.3 13.8 0.0 53.2 27.3 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.7 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D C C D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2236 1370 0 259
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.2 27.5 0.0 38.7
Approach LOS B C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.7 5.7 65.4 22.7 23.8 47.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.0 6.0 74.0 38.0 34.0 46.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 2.7 39.5 16.7 18.9 32.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 22.0 1.6 0.9 7.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 22.9
HCM 6th LOS C
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 128
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 12
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 44 36 58 21 28 60 183 126 40 162 40 Future Vol, veh/h 32 44 36 58 21 28 60 183 126 40 162 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 35 48 40 64 23 31 66 201 138 44 178 44
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh10.1 10.2 13.6 11.3

HCM LOS B B B B
Lane NBLn1EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1
Vol Left, % 16% 29% 54% 17%
Vol Thru, % 50% 39% 20% 67%
Vol Right, % 34% 32% 26% 17%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 369 112 107 242
LT Vol 60 32 58 40
Through Vol 183 44 21 162
RT Vol 126 36 28 40
Lane Flow Rate 405 123 118 266
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.546 0.195 0.189 0.379
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.85 5.694 5.792 5.127
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 742 629 618 702
Service Time 2.88 3.738 3.835 3.16
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.546 0.196 0.191 0.379
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 13.6 10.1 10.2 11.3
HCM Lane LOS B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.3 0.7 0.7 1.8
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 129
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1810 457 343 1217 0 419 0 407 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1810 457 343 1217 0 419 0 407 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1885 476 357 1268 0 436 0 424 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 2 1669 743 380 2202 0 519 562 474 2 393 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.11 0.62 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1582 3456 3647 0 3456 1870 1579 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1885 476 357 1268 0 436 0 424 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1582 1728 1777 0 1728 1870 1579 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 47.0 22.8 10.3 21.1 0.0 12.3 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 47.0 22.8 10.3 21.1 0.0 12.3 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 2 1669 743 380 2202 0 519 562 474 2 393 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 1.13 0.64 0.94 0.58 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 107 1669 743 380 2202 0 656 935 789 107 1314 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 26.5 20.1 44.2 11.3 0.0 41.4 0.0 33.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 66.5 1.9 31.2 0.4 0.0 7.8 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 34.1 8.4 6.0 7.7 0.0 5.7 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 93.0 22.0 75.4 11.6 0.0 49.2 0.0 41.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS F C E B D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2361 1625 860 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 78.7 25.6 45.2 0.0
Approach LOS E C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s0.0 34.1 15.0 51.0 19.0 15.1 0.0 66.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s6.0 50.0 11.0 47.0 19.0 37.0 6.0 52.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 27.7 12.3 49.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 23.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 11.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 54.9
HCM 6th LOS D
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 130
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 41 231 162 385 295 355 155 393 460 289 248 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 41 231 162 385 295 355 155 393 460 289 248 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 243 171 405 311 374 163 414 484 304 261 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 53 301 221 977 529 432 202 493 706 397 927 32 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 315 1795 1320 3456 1870 1529 1781 1870 2679 3456 3500 120 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 253 0 204 405 311 374 163 414 484 304 132 138 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1855 0 1575 1728 1870 1529 1781 1870 1339 1728 1777 1843 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.3 0.0 11.6 8.9 13.4 21.7 8.3 19.5 15.2 8.0 5.5 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.3 0.0 11.6 8.9 13.4 21.7 8.3 19.5 15.2 8.0 5.5 5.6 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 311 0 264 977 529 432 202 493 706 397 471 488 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.77 0.41 0.59 0.87 0.81 0.84 0.69 0.77 0.28 0.28 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 397 0 337 1110 601 491 572 601 861 740 761 790 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh37.4 0.0 37.2 27.2 28.8 31.8 40.4 32.5 30.9 40.1 27.2 27.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.7 0.0 8.2 0.3 1.2 13.6 7.5 8.8 1.7 3.1 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln6.3 0.0 5.0 3.6 6.0 9.4 4.0 9.7 4.9 3.5 2.3 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 47.2 0.0 45.3 27.5 30.0 45.4 47.9 41.3 32.6 43.2 27.6 27.6 LnGrp LOS D D C C D D D C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 457 1090 1061 574
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.4 34.4 38.3 35.9
Approach LOS D C D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s14.7 28.6 19.7 14.6 28.7 30.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s10.0 21.5 14.3 10.3 7.6 23.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 3.1 1.4 0.4 1.5 2.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 37.7
HCM 6th LOS D
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 131
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1200 1431 761 55 86 1129
Future Volume (veh/h) 1200 1431 761 55 86 1129
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1263 1506 801 58 91 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1352 3057 803 680 207
Arrive On Green 0.39 0.86 0.43 0.43 0.06 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1263 1506 801 58 91 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 35.1 10.3 42.8 2.2 2.5 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 35.1 10.3 42.8 2.2 2.5 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h1352 3057 803 680 207
V/C Ratio(X) 0.93 0.49 1.00 0.09 0.44
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1414 3121 803 680 1173
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh29.3 1.7 28.6 16.9 45.5 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.4 0.1 31.2 0.1 1.5 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln16.2 1.3 25.2 0.8 1.1 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 40.6 1.8 59.8 17.0 46.9 0.0
LnGrp LOS D A E B D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2769 859 91
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.5 56.9 46.9
Approach LOS B E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 90.2 10.0 43.2 47.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 41.0 43.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 4.5 37.1 44.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 19.9 0.3 2.1 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 28.8
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 132
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 59 332 56 62 199
Future Vol, veh/h 46 59 332 56 62 199
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 1 0 3 3 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 115 0 - 80 75 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 49 63 353 60 66 212
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 703 357 0 0 416 0
Stage 1 356 - - - - -
Stage 2 347 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 404 687 - - 1143 -
Stage 1 709 - - - - -
Stage 2 716 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 378 684 - - 1140 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 378 - - - - -
Stage 1 707 - - - - -
Stage 2 672 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 13 0 2

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 378 684 1140 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.129 0.092 0.058 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 15.9 10.8 8.4 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.4 0.3 0.2 -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 133
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 25.6
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 12 10 33 15 131 18 439 23 12 116 10 Future Vol, veh/h 13 12 10 33 15 131 18 439 23 12 116 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 16 15 13 41 19 164 23 549 29 15 145 13
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.1 11.9 36.1 10.9

HCM LOS B B E B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 37% 18% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 95% 34% 8% 0% 92%
Vol Right, % 0% 5% 29% 73% 0% 8%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 18 462 35 179 12 126
LT Vol 18 0 13 33 12 0
Through Vol 0 439 12 15 0 116
RT Vol 0 23 10 131 0 10
Lane Flow Rate 23 578 44 224 15 158
Geometry Grp 5 5 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.038 0.891 0.078 0.354 0.028 0.265
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.098 5.557 6.438 5.699 6.626 6.061 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 588 653 553 629 540 592
Service Time 3.829 3.288 4.51 3.753 4.374 3.808
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 0.885 0.08 0.356 0.028 0.267
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.1 37.1 10.1 11.9 9.6 11
HCM Lane LOS A E B B A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 10.9 0.3 1.6 0.1 1.1
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 134
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 298.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 103 32 231 95 0 0 0 0 457 0 55
Future Vol, veh/h 0 103 32 231 95 0 0 0 0 457 0 55
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 250 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 127 40 285 117 0 0 0 0 564 0 68
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 168 0 0 835 855 117
Stage 1 - - - - - - 687 687 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 148 168 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1410 - 0 ~ 338 296 935
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 ~ 499 447 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 880 759 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1410 - - ~ 270 0 935
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 270 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - ~ 499 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 702 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 5.8 $ 563.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1410 - 292
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.202 - 2.165
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 8.2 -$ 563.4
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.8 - 47.5
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 135
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 15: SR 1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 67 485 0 0 337 387 44 0 326 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 67 485 0 0 337 387 44 0 326 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 10 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 225 - - - - 120 - - 25 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 68 495 0 0 344 395 45 0 333 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 741 0 - - - 0 1173 1372 495
Stage 1 - - - - - - 631 631 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 542 741 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 866 - 0 0 - - 212 146 575
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 530 474 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 583 423 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 866 - - - - - 195 0 575
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 195 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 488 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 583 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.2 0 20.6

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 195 575 866 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.23 0.579 0.079 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 28.9 19.5 9.5 - - -
HCM Lane LOS D C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.9 3.7 0.3 - - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 136
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 16: Salinas Ave/Driveway & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 808 13 20 999 0 8 0 27 0 0 5
Future Vol, veh/h 1 808 13 20 999 0 8 0 27 0 0 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 150 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 842 14 21 1041 0 8 0 28 0 0 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1041 0 0 857 0 0 1408 1928 422 1506 1942 521 Stage 1 - - - - - - 845 845 - 1083 1083 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 563 1083 - 423 859 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 664 - - 779 - 0 99 66 580 83 64 500
Stage 1 - - - - - 0 324 377 - 232 292 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 0 478 292 - 579 371 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 664 - - 778 - - 96 64 579 77 62 500
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 96 64 - 77 62 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 323 375 - 231 284 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 460 284 - 549 370 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0.2 20.5 12.3

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 269 664 - - 778 - 500
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.136 0.002 - - 0.027 - 0.01
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 20.5 10.4 - - 9.8 - 12.3
HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 0 - - 0.1 - 0
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 137
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 18: Driveway/Cardoza Ave & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 102 646 17 16 646 81 10 1 11 58 1 67 Future Volume (veh/h) 102 646 17 16 646 81 10 1 11 58 1 67 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 103 653 17 16 653 82 10 1 11 59 1 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 174 1985 876 43 907 759 184 46 112 370 3 226 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.56 0.56 0.02 0.49 0.49 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1568 1781 1870 1565 451 321 773 1400 23 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 653 17 16 653 82 22 0 0 59 0 69 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1568 1781 1870 1565 1545 0 0 1400 0 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 4.4 0.2 0.4 12.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 4.4 0.2 0.4 12.2 1.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.50 1.00 0.99
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 174 1985 876 43 907 759 343 0 0 370 0 229 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.33 0.02 0.37 0.72 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 769 5731 2529 324 2549 2133 1428 0 0 1408 0 1402 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.0 5.3 4.3 21.1 9.0 6.2 16.3 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.1 0.0 5.2 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 3.7 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 22.2 5.4 4.3 26.4 10.1 6.2 16.4 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 17.6 LnGrp LOS C A A C B A B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 773 751 22 128
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.6 10.0 16.4 17.3
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 5.1 28.6 10.4 8.3 25.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.0 8.0 71.0 39.0 19.0 60.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.5 2.4 6.4 3.7 4.4 14.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 5.4 0.6 0.2 5.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 9.5
HCM 6th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 138
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 4: Highway 1 SB Ramp & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1222 0 0 0 318 1
Future Volume (vph) 1222 0 0 0 318 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 0.95
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1774
Flt Permitted 0.95 0.95
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1774
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 1328 0 0 0 346 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1328 0 0 0 0 347
Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 8 1 6
Permitted Phases 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 85.2 28.2
Effective Green, g (s) 85.2 28.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.23
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1242 412
v/s Ratio Prot c0.75
v/s Ratio Perm 0.20
v/c Ratio 1.07 0.84
Uniform Delay, d1 18.1 44.5
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 46.2 14.4
Delay (s) 64.3 58.9
Level of Service E E
Approach Delay (s/veh) 64.3 0.0 58.9
Approach LOS E A E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 63.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 121.4 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 139
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 8: 4th St & Inter-Garrison Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 644 56 60 165 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 644 56 60 165 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hourly flow rate (vph) 716 62 67 183 0 0
Pedestrians 19 5 21
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 2 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 799 1104 773
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 799 1104 773
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 92 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 824 211 397
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 778 250
Volume Left 0 67
Volume Right 62 0
cSH 1700 824
Volume to Capacity 0.46 0.08
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 7
Control Delay (s/veh) 0.0 3.3
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.0 3.3
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 140
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 17: Imjin Rd & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1810 62 166 1090 187 442
Future Volume (vph) 1810 62 166 1090 187 442
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3522 1770 3539 3241 1441
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 3522 1770 3539 3241 1441
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adj. Flow (vph) 1946 67 178 1172 201 475
RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 0 0 150 150
Lane Group Flow (vph) 2011 0 178 1172 289 87
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Turn Type NA Prot NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 66.9 12.6 84.0 16.8 16.8
Effective Green, g (s) 66.9 12.6 84.0 16.8 16.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.11 0.77 0.15 0.15
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2145 203 2707 495 220
v/s Ratio Prot c0.57 c0.10 0.33
v/s Ratio Perm c0.09 0.06
v/c Ratio 0.94 0.88 0.43 0.58 0.40
Uniform Delay, d1 19.6 47.8 4.5 43.2 41.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 8.6 31.8 0.1 1.8 1.2
Delay (s) 28.1 79.6 4.6 45.0 43.1
Level of Service C E A D D
Approach Delay (s/veh) 28.1 14.5 44.3
Approach LOS C B D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 26.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 109.8 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 141

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Future 2045 No Improvements PM)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
Demand
Flows
Arrival
Flows
95% Back Of
Queue
Mov
ID
Turn Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Eff.

Stop
Rate
Aver.

No. of
Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Del Monte Blvd
3 L2 All MCs 262 2.0 262 2.0 0.727 14.4 LOS B 12.2 309.8 0.78 0.59 1.06 28.4 8 T1 All MCs 441 2.0 441 2.0 0.727 14.4 LOS B 12.2 309.8 0.78 0.59 1.06 28.8 18 R2 All MCs 105 2.0 105 2.0 0.727 14.4 LOS B 12.2 309.8 0.78 0.59 1.06 28.6 Approach 808 2.0 808 2.0 0.727 14.4 LOS B 12.2 309.8 0.78 0.59 1.06 28.6 East: Beach Rd
1 L2 All MCs 42 2.0 42 2.0 0.303 10.0 LOS B 1.3 32.6 0.69 0.64 0.71 30.2 6 T1 All MCs 78 2.0 78 2.0 0.303 10.0 LOS B 1.3 32.6 0.69 0.64 0.71 30.7 16 R2 All MCs 62 2.0 62 2.0 0.303 10.0 LOS B 1.3 32.6 0.69 0.64 0.71 30.5 Approach 182 2.0 182 2.0 0.303 10.0 LOS B 1.3 32.6 0.69 0.64 0.71 30.5 North: Del Monte Blvd
7 L2 All MCs 58 2.0 58 2.0 0.485 10.0 LOS B 3.4 85.3 0.66 0.54 0.80 30.4 4 T1 All MCs 313 2.0 313 2.0 0.485 10.0 LOS B 3.4 85.3 0.66 0.54 0.80 30.9 14 R2 All MCs 67 2.0 67 2.0 0.485 10.0 LOS B 3.4 85.3 0.66 0.54 0.80 30.7 Approach 438 2.0 438 2.0 0.485 10.0 LOS B 3.4 85.3 0.66 0.54 0.80 30.8 West: Beach Rd
5 L2 All MCs 60 2.0 60 2.0 0.343 7.9 LOS A 1.7 43.0 0.60 0.45 0.60 31.1 2 T1 All MCs 69 2.0 69 2.0 0.343 7.9 LOS A 1.7 43.0 0.60 0.45 0.60 31.6 12 R2 All MCs 171 2.0 171 2.0 0.343 7.9 LOS A 1.7 43.0 0.60 0.45 0.60 31.4 Approach 300 2.0 300 2.0 0.343 7.9 LOS A 1.7 43.0 0.60 0.45 0.60 31.4 All Vehicles 1729 2.0 1729 2.0 0.727 11.7 LOS B 12.2 309.8 0.71 0.56 0.88 29.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Const raint
effects.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000- 2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2 | Processed: Monday, June 2, 2025 3:59:31 PM Project: \\kimley- horn.com\ca_pls1\Project\SJC_TPTO\City of Marina\097789003- Marina DIF\2025 Update\05 Design & Analysis\Sidra\Marina DIF 2025_v2.sip9
142
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
1: 2nd Ave & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 12 0 15 0 161 95 180 939 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 12 0 15 0 161 95 180 939 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 13 0 16 0 173 102 194 1010 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 6 39 33 76 0 301 6 598 332 277 1978 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.16 0.56 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 2178 1209 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 13 0 16 0 139 136 194 1010 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1611 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.9 2.1 3.3 5.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.9 2.1 3.3 5.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 6 39 33 76 0 301 6 488 442 277 1978 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.29 0.31 0.70 0.51 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 339 1659 1406 564 0 1607 339 2533 2296 1749 7880 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.6 0.0 10.5 0.0 9.0 9.1 12.6 4.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.4 3.2 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.6 1.2 0.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 10.5 0.0 9.3 9.5 15.9 4.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 29 275 1204
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 12.8 9.4 6.4
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 12.7 5.3 4.7 0.0 21.6 0.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 45.0 10.0 28.0 6.0 70.0 6.0 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 4.1 2.2 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 2.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 7.0
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 143
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh42.1
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 8 0 1 36 24 0 19 9 608 11 527
Future Vol, veh/h 97 8 0 1 36 24 0 19 9 608 11 527
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 104 9 0 1 39 26 0 20 10 654 12 567
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh12.5 10.8 9.4 47.3

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 144
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 206 17 0 0 8 12 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 206 17 0 0 8 12 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 4 268 22 0 0 10 16 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1 0 0 277 299 1
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1 1 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 275 297 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1621 - - 713 613 1083
Stage 1 0 - - - - - 1022 895 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - - 771 667 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1621 - - 711 0 1083
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 711 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1022 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 769 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0.1 8.36

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1083 - - 24 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 - - 7.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 145
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 126 828 0 2 1638 54 0 0 0 197 0 439 Future Volume (veh/h) 126 828 0 2 1638 54 0 0 0 197 0 439 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 134 881 0 2 1743 57 0 0 0 210 0 467 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 167 1926 859 6 1604 714 2 268 0 248 609 515
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1583 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1581 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 134 881 0 2 1743 57 0 0 0 210 0 467 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1583 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1581 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 14.1 0.0 0.1 42.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 26.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.9 14.1 0.0 0.1 42.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 26.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 167 1926 859 6 1604 714 2 268 0 248 609 515 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.46 0.00 0.35 1.09 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 306 1985 886 115 1604 714 124 723 0 383 995 841 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.3 13.0 0.0 46.3 25.5 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.1 0.0 30.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.5 0.2 0.0 32.0 50.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 8.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.4 5.3 0.0 0.1 27.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 10.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 49.8 13.1 0.0 78.3 75.6 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.2 0.0 38.6 LnGrp LOS D B E F B D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1015 1802 0 677
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.0 73.7 0.0 41.9
Approach LOS B E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 17.3 4.3 54.4 0.0 34.3 12.8 46.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 36.0 6.0 52.0 6.5 49.5 16.0 42.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.7 0.0 2.1 16.1 0.0 28.3 8.9 44.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 1.7 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 51.3
HCM 7th LOS D
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 146
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 32 25 137 162 56 29 50 177 34 13 372 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 32 25 137 162 56 29 50 177 34 13 372 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 37 29 159 188 65 34 58 206 40 15 433 28 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 184 109 372 480 153 58 214 516 89 132 684 43 Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Sat Flow, veh/h 135 328 1114 844 460 175 178 1289 222 21 1707 108 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 225 0 0 287 0 0 304 0 0 476 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1577 0 0 1479 0 0 1689 0 0 1836 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.2 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.16 0.71 0.66 0.12 0.19 0.13 0.03 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 665 0 0 691 0 0 819 0 0 859 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3253 0 0 2937 0 0 3316 0 0 3806 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.8 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 8.1 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 225 287 304 476
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.1 8.4 6.8 7.8
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.1 14.0 16.1 14.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 5.2 8.3 6.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.3 1.6 3.5 2.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 7.7
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 147
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 947 560 500 1267 0 206 0 133 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 947 560 500 1267 0 206 0 133 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 986 583 521 1320 0 215 0 139 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 3 1597 1251 698 2552 1138 337 277 233 3 6 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.20 0.72 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 2783 3456 3554 1585 3456 1870 1575 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 986 583 521 1320 0 215 0 139 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1392 1728 1777 1585 1728 1870 1575 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 12.6 8.7 8.5 10.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 12.6 8.7 8.5 10.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1597 1251 698 2552 1138 337 277 233 3 6 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.62 0.47 0.75 0.52 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 179 2615 2048 1329 3625 1617 520 1282 1080 179 2258 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 12.5 11.5 22.4 3.8 0.0 26.0 0.0 23.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.3 1.6 0.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 4.4 2.3 3.3 1.9 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 12.9 11.7 24.0 3.9 0.0 28.0 0.0 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B C A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1569 1841 354 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.5 9.6 27.3 0.0
Approach LOS B A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s0.0 12.8 16.1 30.9 9.8 3.0 0.0 47.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s6.0 41.0 23.0 44.0 9.0 38.0 6.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 6.9 10.5 14.6 5.6 0.0 0.0 12.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 1.6 11.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 14.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 12.5
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 148
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 237 106 224 166 232 146 268 206 579 595 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 30 237 106 224 166 232 146 268 206 579 595 21 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 34 272 122 257 191 267 168 308 237 666 684 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 278 374 163 758 410 341 211 392 575 760 1089 38 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.12 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2395 1043 3456 1870 1553 1781 1870 2743 3456 3501 123 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 34 200 194 257 191 267 168 308 237 666 347 361 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1661 1728 1870 1553 1781 1870 1372 1728 1777 1847 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 8.8 9.2 5.1 7.3 13.3 7.5 12.8 6.1 15.3 13.7 13.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 8.8 9.2 5.1 7.3 13.3 7.5 12.8 6.1 15.3 13.7 13.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 278 277 259 758 410 341 211 392 575 760 553 575 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.72 0.75 0.34 0.47 0.78 0.80 0.79 0.41 0.88 0.63 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 434 433 405 1263 684 567 651 684 1003 842 866 900 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh29.8 32.9 33.1 27.0 27.9 30.2 35.2 30.7 28.1 30.9 24.2 24.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 3.5 4.3 0.3 0.8 4.0 6.7 3.5 0.5 9.6 1.2 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 3.9 3.9 2.1 3.3 5.2 3.5 5.9 2.0 7.1 5.6 5.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 30.0 36.5 37.4 27.3 28.7 34.2 41.9 34.2 28.5 40.5 25.4 25.3 LnGrp LOS C D D C C C D C C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 428 715 713 1374
Approach Delay, s/veh 36.4 30.2 34.1 32.7
Approach LOS D C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s22.1 21.2 16.8 13.7 29.5 22.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s17.3 14.8 11.2 9.5 15.7 15.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 2.4 1.6 0.4 4.4 2.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 33.0
HCM 7th LOS C
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 149
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1156 251 1788 127 27 1502
Future Volume (veh/h) 1156 251 1788 127 27 1502
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1257 273 1943 138 29 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1287 3066 843 715 203
Arrive On Green 0.37 0.86 0.45 0.45 0.06 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1257 273 1943 138 29 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 36.6 1.2 46.0 5.3 0.8 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 36.6 1.2 46.0 5.3 0.8 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h1287 3066 843 715 203
V/C Ratio(X) 0.98 0.09 2.30 0.19 0.14
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1287 3066 843 715 1152
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh31.6 1.0 28.0 16.8 45.6 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 19.6 0.0 590.3 0.1 0.3 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln18.2 0.1 157.8 1.9 0.4 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 51.1 1.1 618.3 17.0 45.9 0.0
LnGrp LOS D A F B D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1530 2081 29
Approach Delay, s/veh 42.2 578.4 45.9
Approach LOS D F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 92.0 10.0 42.0 50.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 38.0 46.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 2.8 38.6 48.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 348.8
HCM 7th LOS F
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 150
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 61 127 145 27 57 620
Future Volume (veh/h) 61 127 145 27 57 620
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On ApproachNo No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 67 140 159 30 63 681
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 359 319 587 496 146 991
Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.53
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1870 1580 1781 1870
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 67 140 159 30 63 681
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1585 1870 1580 1781 1870
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 2.3 1.9 0.4 1.0 8.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 2.3 1.9 0.4 1.0 8.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 359 319 587 496 146 991
V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.44 0.27 0.06 0.43 0.69
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1914 1703 4521 3819 837 5651
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.9 10.4 7.7 7.1 13.0 5.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.9 0.2 0.1 2.0 0.9
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.4 1.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 10.1 11.4 7.9 7.2 15.0 6.0
LnGrp LOS B B A A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 207 189 744
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.0 7.8 6.8
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.4 13.4 19.8 10.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s14.0 72.0 90.0 32.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.0 3.9 10.0 4.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.1 5.8 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 7.7
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 151
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 10
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 6 9 18 175 12 58 4 98 10 22 730 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 6 9 18 175 12 58 4 98 10 22 730 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 7 10 21 203 14 67 5 114 12 26 849 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 114 155 254 363 30 93 14 844 89 61 1001 0
Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.51 0.51 0.03 0.54 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 182 557 913 975 108 334 1781 1659 175 1781 1870 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 38 0 0 284 0 0 5 0 126 26 849 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1652 0 0 1417 0 0 1781 0 1834 1781 1870 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.4 1.0 25.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.4 1.0 25.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.18 0.55 0.71 0.24 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 523 0 0 486 0 0 14 0 933 61 1001 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.14 0.43 0.85 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1034 0 0 949 0 0 265 0 1803 292 1866 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh17.9 0.0 0.0 21.7 0.0 0.0 33.1 0.0 8.7 31.8 13.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.1 4.6 2.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.5 9.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 0.0 47.4 0.0 8.8 36.4 15.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS B C D A D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 38 284 131 875
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.0 22.8 10.2 16.0
Approach LOS B C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.3 38.2 22.7 4.5 39.9 22.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s11.0 66.0 41.0 10.0 67.0 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.0 4.4 3.1 2.2 27.9 14.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 8.0 1.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 17.0
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 152
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 11
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 45 28 319 41 0 0 0 0 184 43 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 45 28 319 41 0 0 0 0 184 43 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 52 32 367 47 0 211 49 18
Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 0 174 107 479 1007 0 333 77 28
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.54 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1073 660 1781 1870 0 1352 314 115
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 84 367 47 0 278 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1734 1781 1870 0 1781 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 1.6 7.0 0.4 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 1.6 7.0 0.4 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.38 1.00 0.00 0.76 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 0 280 479 1007 0 438 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.77 0.05 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 0 1448 2304 4183 0 1872 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 13.7 12.5 4.1 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.0 0.6 2.5 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 14.3 15.1 4.1 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 84 414 278
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.3 13.8 14.0
Approach LOS B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.0 10.0 13.1 24.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 48.0 31.0 39.0 83.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.0 3.6 7.2 2.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.4 1.8 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 14.0
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Marina City CouncilJuly 1, 2025

Marina City Council
July 1, 2025