Agenda — Marina City Council, September 16, 2025

AMENDED

AGENDA

Tuesday, September 16, 2025 5:00 P.M. Closed Session
6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR

AGENCY OF THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).

Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California

AND

Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556

PARTICIPATION
You may participate in the City Council meeting in person or in real-time by calling Zoom Meeting via the weblink and phone number provided at the top of this agenda. Instructions on how to access, view and participate in remote meetings are provided by visiting the City’s home page at https://cityofmarina.org/. Attendees can make oral comments during the meeting by using the “Raise Your Hand” feature in the webinar or by pressing *9 on your telephone keypad if joining by phone only.

The most effective method of communication with the City Council is by sending an email to [email protected] Comments will be reviewed and distributed before the meeting if received by 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. All comments received will become part of the record.

Council will have the option to modify their action on items based on comments received.

AGENDA MATERIALS
Agenda materials, staff reports and background information related to regular agenda items are available on the City of Marina’s website www.cityofmarina.org. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available on the City of Marina website www.cityofmarina.org subject to City staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.

VISION STATEMENT
Marina will grow and mature from a small town bedroom community to a small city which is diversified, vibrant and through positive relationships with regional agencies, self -sufficient. The City will develop in a way that insulates it from the negative impacts of urban sprawl to become a desirable residential and business community in a natural setting. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, September 16, 2025 Page 2

MISSION STATEMENT
The City Council will provide the leadership in protecting Marina’s natural setting while developing the City in a way that provides a balance of housing, jobs and business opportunities that will result in a community characterized by a desirable quality of life, including recreation and cultural opportunities, a safe environment and an economic viability that supports a high level of municipal services and infrastructure. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The City recognizes that it was founded and is built upon the traditional homelands and villages first inhabited by the Indigenous Peoples of this region - the Esselen and their ancestors and allies - and honors these members of the community, both past and present.

1. CALL TO ORDER

Jenny McAdams, Brian McCarthy, Kathy Biala, Mayor Pro-Tem/Vice Chair Liesbeth Visscher, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None

4. CLOSED SESSION:
a. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation (§ 54956.9(d)) i. Application of California-American Water Company (U210W), Application 21-11-024, California Public Utilities Commission. ii. City of Marina, et. al. v. California Coastal Commission, et al., 22-CV- 004063, Monterey Superior Court.
iii. City of Marina, et al. v. RMC Lonestar, et. al., 20-CV-001387, Monterey Superior Court.
c. Public Employee Performance Evaluation, Unrepresented Employee (CA Govt. Code Section 54957(b)) – City Manager
6:30 PM - RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN

CLOSED SESSION

5. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. Blue Zone Certification – Kendra Howell
b. Friendship City with Izunokuni, Japan Welcome of Yuzuki Yamashita Proclamation

7. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS:

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, September 16, 2025 Page 3

considered by the City Council. Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.

9. CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Background information has been provided to the Successor Agency of the former Redevelopment Agency on all matters listed under the Consent Agenda, and these items are considered to be routine and non -controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda are normally approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of the public or City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, the Council may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. If an item is pulled for discussion, it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency.

10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and non -controversial.

All items under the Consent Agenda may be approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, Council may remove the item from the Consent Agenda and it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items.
a. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Accounts Payable Check Numbers 107673-107729, totaling $953,078.34.

Accounts Payable Successor Agency Check Number 134, totaling $3,250.00. b. MINUTES: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) September 3, 2025, Regular City Council Meeting
(2) September 9, 2025, Special City Council Meeting
c. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: None
d. AWARD OF BID: None
e. CALL FOR BIDS:
(1) Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -, approving advertising and call for bids for the Imjin Pkwy and 3rd Ave. Intersection Improvement Project. f. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS: None
g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -, a uthorizing a professional services agreement with Wallace Group of San Luis Obispo, CA for engineering services in an amount not to exceed $90,000.00 for undergrounding of overhead utilities at the City Park at the Dunes.
h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: None
i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE):
(1) Monterey-Salinas Transit September 8, 2025, Board Meeting Highlights k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS: None
Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, September 16, 2025 Page 4

l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING):
(1) Read by Title Only and adopting Ordinance No. 202 5-13, amending the Marina Municipal Code, Title 3, Chapter 3.16 by adding two new sections,

3.16.080 and 3.16.090 - Alternative Project Delivery Method for Public Works Projects.
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS: None

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS: In the Council’s discretion, the applicant/proponent of an item may be given up to ten (10) minutes to speak. All other persons may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak on the matter.
a. Open public hearing and consider introducing Ordinance No. 2025 -, amending Section 17.52.020 of the Marina Municipal Code (MMC) removing the phrase “male and female impersonators” from the Definition of “Adult cabaret” thereby removing this form of personal and cultural expression from uses regulated by the Adult Businesses and Massage Therapists section of the MMC. The proposed Ordinance adoption is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section and 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.”. b. Receive informational presentation on a Development Impact Fee Nexus Study; and adopt the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study; and Open the public hearing and take any testimony from the public, and; consider introducing Ordinance No. 2025 -, amending chapter 3.26 of the Marina Municipal Code regarding mitigation fees for new development within the City of Marina.

12. OTHER ACTIONS ITEMS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY : Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The Successor Agency may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

13. OTHER ACTION ITEMS: Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The City Council may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

Note: No additional major projects or programs should be undertaken without review of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006).

14. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council reports on meetings and conferences attended ( Gov’t Code Section 53232).

15. ADJOURNMENT:

CERTIFICATION

I, Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Marina, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall and Council Chambers Bulletin Board at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Monterey County Library Marina Branch at 190 Seaside Circle, City Bulletin Board at the corner of Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard on or before 6:30 p.m., Friday, September 12, 2025.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, September 16, 2025 Page 5

___________________________________

ANITA SHARP, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
City Council, Airport Commission and Redevelopment Agency meetings are recorded on tape and available for public review and listening at the Office of the City Clerk and kept for a period of 90 days after the formal approval of MINUTES.

City Council meetings may be viewed live on the meeting night and at 12:30 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. on Cable Channel 25 on the Sunday following the Regular City Council meeting date. In addition, Council meetings can be viewed at 6:30 p.m. every Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. For more information about viewing the Council Meetings on Channel 25, you may contact Access Monterey Peninsula directly at 831-333-1267.

Agenda items and staff reports are public record and are available for public review on the City's website (www.ciytofmarina.org), at the Monterey County Marina Library Branch at 190 Seaside Circle and at the Office of the City Clerk at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina between the hours of 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m., on the Monday preceding the meeting.

Supplemental materials received after the close of the final agenda and through noon on the day of the scheduled meeting will be available for public review at the City Clerk’s Office during regular office hours and in a ‘Supplemental Binder’ at the meeting.

ALL MEETINGS ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. THE CITY OF MARINA DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible. Meetings are broadcast on cable channel 25 and recordings of meetings can be provided upon request. To request assistive listening devices, sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please call (831) 884 -1278 or e -mail:
[email protected]. Requests must be made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.

U p c o m i n g 202 5 M e e t i n g s o f t h e C i t y C o u n c i l , A i r p o r t C o m m i s s i o n , M a r i n a A b r a m s B N o n - P r o f i t C o r p o r a t i o n , P r e s t o n P a r k S u s t a i n a b l e C o m m u n i t y N o n p r o f i t C o r p o r a t i o n , S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y o f t h e F o r m e r R e d e v e l o p m e n t A g e n c y a n d M a r i n a G r o u n d w a t e r S u s t a i n a b i l i t y A g e n c y R e g u l a r M e e t i n g s : 5 : 0 0 p . m . C l o s e d S e s s i o n ; 6 : 3 0 p . m . R e g u l a r O p e n S e s s i o n s

Tuesday, October 7, 2025
Tuesday, October 21, 2025

Tuesday, November 4, 2025
Tuesday, November 18, 2025

Tuesday, December 2, 2025
Tuesday, December 16, 2025
C I T Y H A L L 202 5 H O L I D A Y S
(City Hall Closed)

Veterans Day (City Offices Closed) ----------------------------- Tuesday, November 11, 2025 Thanksgiving Day ------------------------------------------------- Thursday, November 27, 2025 Thanksgiving Break -------------------------------------------------- Friday, November 28, 2025 Winter Break ------------ Wednesday, December 24, 2025-Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, September 16, 2025 Page 6

2025 COMMISSION DATES

U p c o m i n g 2025 M e e t i n g s o f P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n 2nd and 4th Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

September 25, 2025 October 9, 2025
October 23, 2025 November 13, 2025
November 27, 2025 (Cancelled)
December 11, 2025

U p c o m i n g 2025 M e e t i n g s o f P u b l i c W o r k s C o m m i s s i o n 1st Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

October 2, 2025 November 6, 2025 December 4, 2025

U p c o m i n g 2025 M e e t i n g s o f R e c r e a t i o n & C u l t u r a l S e r v i c e s C o m m i s s i o n
1st Wednesday of every second month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

November 5, 2025

U p c o m i n g 2 0 2 5 M e e t i n g s o f M a r i n a T r e e C o m m i t t e e 2nd Wednesday of every quarter month as needed. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

October 8, 2025

Agenda Item: 6b
Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 110 - City Council
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
11790 - Quality Print & Copy 24364 1000 Business Cards - Councilmember Biala
Paid by EFT #
6611
08/26/2025 08/25/2025 08/25/2025 09/05/2025 200.73
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $200.73 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $200.73 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $200.73 Department 110 - City Council Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $200.73 Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.465 - Prof Svc Legal - Special Counsel
11505 - Shartsis Friese LLP 5512901 Professional Services - MPWSP - July 2025
Paid by Check
# 107693
08/29/2025 08/29/2025 08/29/2025 09/05/2025 104,296.60
Account 6300.465 - Prof Svc Legal - Special Counsel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $104,296.60 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $104,296.60 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $104,296.60 Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $104,296.60 Department 130 - Finance
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.210 - Prof Svc Fin - Actuarial
11710 - HdL Coren & Cone SIN053912 2024-25 ACFR
Statistical Package
Paid by EFT #
6606
08/28/2025 09/03/2025 09/03/2025 09/05/2025 795.00
Account 6300.210 - Prof Svc Fin - Actuarial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $795.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $795.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $795.00 Department 130 - Finance Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $795.00 Department 150 - City Attorney
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc 10257 - Goldfarb & Lipman 486112 The Dunes - July 2025 Paid by EFT # 6605
08/27/2025 08/25/2025 08/25/2025 09/05/2025 365.00
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $365.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $365.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $365.00 Department 150 - City Attorney Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $365.00 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM Page 1 of 15 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 09/05/25 - 09/05/25
Agenda Item: 10a
Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.217 - Prof Svc Fin - Business Lic Services
10274 - Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates
( HDL )
SIN053404
July 2025 BL Admin
Fee
Paid by EFT #
6607
07/31/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025
9,180.71
Account
6300.217 - Prof Svc Fin - Business Lic Services
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $9,180.71
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
12208 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE
2307
2019 Dodge Durango
PD
Paid by Check
# 107691
07/16/2025
08/27/2025
08/27/2025
09/05/2025
730.00
10274 - Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates
( HDL )
SIN053405
July 2025 - HDL TOT
Paid by EFT #
6607
07/31/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025
2,365.13
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $3,095.13
Account
6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10129 - Cintas Corporation
4241811593
Mat Service City Hall
Paid by Check
# 107679
08/29/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025

61.72 Account
6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $61.72
Account
6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023976834
CALNET3-9391023477
(582-9803)
Paid by Check
# 107677
08/27/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025

31.17 10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023976828
CALNET3-9391023471
(582-0100)
Paid by Check
# 107677
08/27/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025

64.81 10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023978920
CALNET3-9391023463
(384-7854)
Paid by Check
# 107677
08/28/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025

31.16 10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023978895
CALNET3-9391023440
(384-0860)
Paid by Check
# 107677
08/28/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025

31.21 10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023978896
CALNET3-9391023441
(384-0888)
Paid by Check
# 107677
08/28/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025

31.16 10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023978892
CALNET3-9391023437
(384-0425)
Paid by Check
# 107677
08/28/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025

47.40 10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023978923
CALNET3-9391023466
(384-8477)
Paid by Check
# 107677
08/28/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025

60.77 10758 - AT & T CALNET3
000023978925
CALNET3-9391023468
(384-9148)
Paid by Check
# 107677
08/28/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025

31.16 Account
6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
Totals
Invoice Transactions
8 $328.84
Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
Aug 2025 56-
046
3100 Preston Dr
Paid by Check
# 107688
08/20/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025
180.11
Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $180.11
Account
6600.740 - Other Charges Special Event
11871 - The State of California, Judicial
Council
27-B1-2025-08-
12 Marina Court House
Parking Lot
Paid by Check
# 107699
08/12/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025
200.00
Account
6600.740 - Other Charges Special Event
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $200.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
14 $13,046.51
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 2 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
14 $13,046.51
Department
190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
14 $13,046.51
Department
210 - Police
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10456 - Shred-it USA - Stericycle, Inc.
8011705465
Shredding - Onsite
Paid by Check
# 107694
08/18/2025
08/22/2025
08/22/2025
09/05/2025
172.61
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $172.61
Account
6360.344 - Maint & Repairs IT - Office Equip & PC Upgrades 10623 - Xerox Financial Services
40853874
Printer Paper Tray 550
sheet non-serialized
8/10 - 9/09/25
Paid by Check
# 107704
08/21/2025
08/22/2025
08/22/2025
09/05/2025

2.04 Account
6360.344 - Maint & Repairs IT - Office Equip & PC Upgrades Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2.04
Account
6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10623 - Xerox Financial Services
40853875
Svc payment 8/10 -
9/09/25
Paid by Check
# 107704
08/21/2025
08/22/2025
08/22/2025
09/05/2025
782.85
Account
6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $782.85
Account
6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10053 - AT & T
Aug 2025 0676
Acct # 325820676
Paid by Check
# 107676
08/13/2025
08/22/2025
08/22/2025
09/05/2025
204.03
10057 - Avaya, Inc.
2222010967
Acct # 100828859
Paid by EFT #
6602
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
08/22/2025
09/05/2025

10.30 10057 - Avaya, Inc.
2222007645
Acct # 100828859
Paid by EFT #
6602
08/03/2025
08/22/2025
08/22/2025
09/05/2025

2.19 10374 - Maynard Group Inc.

IN2059268
Utilities - Phones / Acct
#AC3746
Paid by EFT #
6610
09/01/2025
09/01/2025
08/22/2025
09/05/2025
676.53
Account
6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $893.05
Account
6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
11781 - K
’
Shante Dela Cuadra - Employee
9-07-25
Per Diem Dela Cuadra -
Firearms and Tactical
Rifle Course 9/7
Paid by Check
# 107685
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
506.00
11892 - Lizette Rocha-Alvarez - Emp
9-08-25
Per Diem Rocha - CA
CLETS Users Group
CCUG Seminar
Paid by Check
# 107687
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025
207.00
11840 - Nicholas Beavers - Employee
9-02-25
Per Diem Beavers -
COLT M4 / M16
Armorers Course
9/02/25
Paid by Check
# 107690
08/19/2025
08/19/2025
08/19/2025
09/05/2025

30.00 11604 - Ryan Parra
9-08-25
Per Diem Parra - POST
Glock AR-15 &
Remington 870
Armorer Course
Paid by Check
# 107692
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025

54.00 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 3 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
210 - Police
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
12187 - Tanya Nava - Employee
9-08-25
Per Diem Nava - CA
CLETS Users Group
CCUG Seminar
Paid by Check
# 107698
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025
207.00
Account
6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
Totals
Invoice Transactions
5 $1,004.00
Account
6600.465 - Other Charges Live Scan
10193 - California Department of Justice
834279
Livescans
Paid by Check
# 107678
08/07/2025
08/22/2025
08/22/2025
09/05/2025
275.00
Account
6600.465 - Other Charges Live Scan
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $275.00
Account
6600.625 - Other Charges Printing Svc
12091 - MP EXPRESS, INC.
78807
Vehicle Check / Parking
Warning Slips
Paid by Check
# 107689
08/20/2025
08/22/2025
08/22/2025
09/05/2025
237.30
Account
6600.625 - Other Charges Printing Svc
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $237.30
Account
6600.780 - Other Charges Transcription Svc
10544 - SpeakWrite
c8cbfbf0
Transcription Service;
Online Reporting
Paid by Check
# 107696
09/01/2025
09/01/2025
08/22/2025
09/05/2025
3,294.93
Account
6600.780 - Other Charges Transcription Svc
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,294.93
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
15 $6,661.78
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
15 $6,661.78
Department
210 - Police
Totals
Invoice Transactions
15 $6,661.78
Department
250 - Fire
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.565 - Maint & Repairs Office Equip
11788 - City Management Advisors LLC -
Peckham & McKenney
#1FC
City of Marina
Professional Invoice
Fee Fire Chief Search
Paid by Check
# 107680
07/01/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025
9,333.33
11788 - City Management Advisors LLC -
Peckham & McKenney
#2FC
City of Marina
Professional Invoice
Fee Fire Chief Search
Paid by Check
# 107680
08/01/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025
9,333.33
Account
6360.565 - Maint & Repairs Office Equip
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $18,666.66
Account
6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10129 - Cintas Corporation
4241811390
Shop Towel - Microfiber
Towel
Paid by Check
# 107679
08/29/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025
160.09
Account
6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $160.09
Account
6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
10323 - L.N. Curtis & Sons
INV982697
Tools for 5401
Paid by EFT #
6608
08/25/2025
08/26/2025
08/26/2025
09/05/2025
178.88
Account
6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $178.88
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 4 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
250 - Fire
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10603 - Verizon Wireless
6121941079
371782403-00002 FD
Mobile Jul 26 - Aug 25
Paid by EFT #
6612
08/25/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025
532.34
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $532.34
Account
6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
10599 - Valley Saw & Garden Equipment
418858
Chain Saw FD
Paid by Check
# 107702
08/27/2025
08/27/2025
08/27/2025
09/05/2025
1,243.21
Account
6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,243.21
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
6 $20,781.18
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
6 $20,781.18
Department
250 - Fire
Totals
Invoice Transactions
6 $20,781.18
Department
310 - Public Works
Division
311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.040 - Maint & Repairs Backflow Preventers
10183 - David Sollid / Marina Backflow
Company
4053
Susan Ave
Paid by Check
# 107681
08/25/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025
170.00
Account
6360.040 - Maint & Repairs Backflow Preventers
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $170.00
Account
6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
092119
306 Reservation Rental
Paid by Check
# 107674
08/18/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025

25.12 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
092114
306 Reservation Rental
Paid by Check
# 107674
08/18/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025

90.19 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
092095
VD Park
Paid by Check
# 107674
08/14/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025

15.27 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
092096
City Hall
Paid by Check
# 107674
08/14/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025

14.19 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
092139
Window horse stable
Paid by Check
# 107674
08/21/2025
08/29/2025
08/29/2025
09/05/2025
114.85
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
092099
306 Reservation Rental
Paid by Check
# 107674
08/15/2025
08/29/2025
08/29/2025
09/05/2025

22.92 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works
092103
306 Reservation Rental
Paid by Check
# 107674
08/15/2025
08/29/2025
08/29/2025
09/05/2025

37.77 10034 - American Supply Co.
3069743
City Supplies
Paid by Check
# 107675
08/26/2025
08/29/2025
08/29/2025
09/05/2025
3,814.90
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 5 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
310 - Public Works
Division
311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
10230 - Ewing
27388764
Irrigation
Paid by Check
# 107683
08/25/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
315.92
Account
6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $4,451.13
Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
Aug 2025 56-
006
188 Seaside Cir
Paid by Check
# 107688
08/20/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025
417.84
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
Aug 2025 56-
042
3040 Lake Dr
Paid by Check
# 107688
08/20/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025
272.97
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
Aug 2025 56-
045
3100 Preston Dr
Paid by Check
# 107688
08/20/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025
2,100.38
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
Aug 2025 56-
061
Reservation/Locke
Paddon Park
Paid by Check
# 107688
08/20/2025
08/29/2025
08/29/2025
09/05/2025
190.97
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
Aug 2025 56-
090
Locke Paddon Park
Paid by Check
# 107688
08/20/2025
08/29/2025
08/29/2025
09/05/2025
146.41
Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
Totals
Invoice Transactions
5 $3,128.57
Account
6400.630 - Material & Suppl Portable Toilet
10588 - United Site Services
INV-5570027
2660 5th Ave
Paid by Check
# 107701
08/31/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025
893.61
Account
6400.630 - Material & Suppl Portable Toilet
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $893.61
Account
6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
10264 - Green Rubber-Kennedy AG
S-811580
Tingley FL Lime
Paid by Check
# 107684
08/21/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025

88.10 Account
6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $88.10
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
17 $8,731.41
Division
311 - Buildings & Grounds
Totals
Invoice Transactions
17 $8,731.41
Division
313 - Vehicle Maint
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
12208 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE
2307
2019 Dodge Durango
PD
Paid by Check
# 107691
07/16/2025
08/27/2025
08/27/2025
09/05/2025
566.94
12181 - Sound Billing, LLC / MyFleetCenter
7003105
2003 Ford Truck F250
Airport
Paid by Check
# 107695
08/22/2025
08/27/2025
08/27/2025
09/05/2025
161.98
12181 - Sound Billing, LLC / MyFleetCenter
7000567
FD 2024 F150 Ford
Pick up
Paid by Check
# 107695
07/10/2025
08/27/2025
08/27/2025
09/05/2025
116.27
Account
6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $845.19
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $845.19
Division
313 - Vehicle Maint
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $845.19
Department
310 - Public Works
Totals
Invoice Transactions
20 $9,576.60
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 6 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
410 - Planning
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc.
32882426
Marina Station Traffic
Paid by Check
# 107686
07/31/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
2,952.00
Account
6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,952.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,952.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,952.00
Department
410 - Planning
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,952.00
Department
420 - Engineering
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.175 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Plan Check
10171 - CSG Consultants
62372
Sea Haven Inspection
Phase 3B
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
2,052.00
10171 - CSG Consultants
62373
Sea Haven Inspections
Phase 4
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
8,550.00
Account
6300.175 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Plan Check
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $10,602.00
Account
6300.185 - Prof Svc Engineering Svs-Staff Augment
10171 - CSG Consultants
62362
Staff Augmentaion
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
4,930.50
Account
6300.185 - Prof Svc Engineering Svs-Staff Augment
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $4,930.50
Account
6300.190 - Prof Svc Engineering Svc Interagency
10171 - CSG Consultants
62363
RWQCB
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
912.00
Account
6300.190 - Prof Svc Engineering Svc Interagency
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $912.00
Account
6330.200 - Fee Agr Costs - Engineering
10171 - CSG Consultants
62366
Dunes Phase 2 West-
Inspections
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
1,026.00
10171 - CSG Consultants
62367
Dunes Phase 3 North
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
2,052.00
10171 - CSG Consultants
62368
Dunes Promenade 1B
Inspections
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
456.00
10171 - CSG Consultants
62369
Inspections Dunes
Phase 3 North
Improvements
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
6,156.00
10171 - CSG Consultants
62374
Via Del Mar Subdvision
(3320 Abdy Way)
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
171.00
Account
6330.200 - Fee Agr Costs - Engineering
Totals
Invoice Transactions
5 $9,861.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $26,305.50
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $26,305.50
Department
420 - Engineering
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $26,305.50
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 7 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Totals
Invoice Transactions
69 $184,980.90
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 8 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

78.07 10349 - Marina Coast Water District
Aug 2025 56-
040
Hilo Ave
Paid by Check
# 107688
08/20/2025
08/28/2025
08/28/2025
09/05/2025

50.75 Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $128.82
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $128.82
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $128.82
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $128.82
Fund
220 - Gas Tax
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $128.82
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 9 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
235 - Cypress Cove II AD
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection
10171 - CSG Consultants
62354
Marina Landscapt Maint
Dis Eff 7/1/25 Cypress
Cove
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
1,140.00
Account
6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,140.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,140.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,140.00
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,140.00
Fund
235 - Cypress Cove II AD
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,140.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 10 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
251 - CFD - Locke Paddon
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District
Aug 2025 16-
000
199 A Paddon Place
Paid by Check
# 107688
08/20/2025
08/29/2025
08/29/2025
09/05/2025
153.67
Account
6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $153.67
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $153.67
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $153.67
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $153.67
Fund
251 - CFD - Locke Paddon
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $153.67
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 11 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
252 - CFD - Dunes No. 2015-1
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection
10171 - CSG Consultants
62355
Locke Paddon CDF
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
228.00
10171 - CSG Consultants
62356
Phase1C CFD
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
228.00
Account
6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $456.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $456.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $456.00
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $456.00
Fund
252 - CFD - Dunes No. 2015-1
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $456.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 12 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
255 - Housing Assistance Fund
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6600.400 - Other Charges - Fees
12067 - Sterling Management / Sterling
Property Management
09-01-25
306 Reservation Road -
HOA Fee - September
2025
Paid by Check
# 107697
08/01/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/05/2025
555.98
Account
6600.400 - Other Charges - Fees
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $555.98
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $555.98
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $555.98
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $555.98
Fund
255 - Housing Assistance Fund
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $555.98
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 13 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
352 - Measure-X C.O.P. Debt Service
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.226 - Prof Svc Fin - Fees - Trustee
11250 - U.S. Bank
7869339
2022 Certificates of
Participation Trans
Infrastructure Project
Paid by Check
# 107700
08/25/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025
3,250.00
Account
6300.226 - Prof Svc Fin - Fees - Trustee
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Fund
352 - Measure-X C.O.P. Debt Service
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 14 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
462 - City Capital Projects
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10171 - CSG Consultants
62358
PFIP UPdate
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
114.00
10171 - CSG Consultants
62359
Imjin Widening
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
4,560.00
10171 - CSG Consultants
62360
Salinas Ave Widening
Paid by EFT #
6604
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
228.00
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $4,902.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $4,902.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $4,902.00
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $4,902.00
Fund
462 - City Capital Projects
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $4,902.00
Grand Totals
Invoice Transactions
80 $195,567.37
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:38:55 AM

Page 15 of 15 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.010 - Prof Svc Admin - Muni Code
10149 - Code Publishing Inc. - General
Code
GCI0018262
MMC Web Update
Paid by Check
# 107711
08/29/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
2,235.00
Account
6300.010 - Prof Svc Admin - Muni Code
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,235.00
Account
6300.310 - Prof Svc HR - Labor Relation& Negotiation
12265 - Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud &
Romo
759123
AALRR Professional
Corp.

Paid by Check
# 107708
07/31/2025
08/21/2025
08/21/2025
09/12/2025
17,718.75
Account
6300.310 - Prof Svc HR - Labor Relation& Negotiation
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $17,718.75
Account
6300.465 - Prof Svc Legal - Special Counsel
11033 - Sara Steck Myers
09-02-25
Professional Services -
MPWSP - July-August
2025
Paid by EFT #
6659
09/02/2025
09/05/2025
09/05/2025
09/12/2025
14,670.00
Account
6300.465 - Prof Svc Legal - Special Counsel
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $14,670.00
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
12265 - Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud &
Romo
759123
AALRR Professional
Corp.

Paid by Check
# 107708
07/31/2025
08/21/2025
08/21/2025
09/12/2025
4,536.53
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $4,536.53
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $39,160.28
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $39,160.28
Department
120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $39,160.28
Department
125 - I. T.

Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.330 - Prof Svc IT - Information Tech Svc
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13120
IT Support - August
2025
Paid by EFT #
6661
09/01/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
11,400.00
Account
6300.330 - Prof Svc IT - Information Tech Svc
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $11,400.00
Account
6360.076 - Maint & Repairs Copier
10592 - U.S. Bank Equipment Finance-
USbancorp
563257484
CDD Copier Lease
Payment - September
2025
Paid by Check
# 107725
08/30/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
225.06
Account
6360.076 - Maint & Repairs Copier
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $225.06
Account
6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13117
Citywide MS Office 365
- September 2025
Paid by EFT #
6661
09/01/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
2,714.00
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13108
Veeam Subscription -
September 2025
Paid by EFT #
6661
09/01/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
544.00
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13079
Zoom Fees - August
2025
Paid by EFT #
6661
08/31/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
533.85
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 1 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
125 - I. T.

Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13109
Amazon Glacier -
Subscription -
September 2025
Paid by EFT #
6661
09/01/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
475.00
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13126
Veeam O365 Backup &
Glacier Storage -
August 2025
Paid by EFT #
6661
08/01/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
400.00
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13099
Ninite Subscription -
September 2025
Paid by EFT #
6661
09/01/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
216.00
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13127
Veeam O365 Backup &
Glacier Storage -
September 2025
Paid by EFT #
6661
09/01/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
400.00
10905 - Taygeta Scientific, Inc.
000423-R-0081
Computer Network
Defense - September
2025
Paid by Check
# 107723
09/01/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
2,750.00
10905 - Taygeta Scientific, Inc.
000708-R-0054
Barracuda Spam
Firewall - September
2025
Paid by Check
# 107723
09/01/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
475.80
Account
6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $8,508.65
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
11 $20,133.71
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
11 $20,133.71
Department
125 - I. T.

Totals
Invoice Transactions
11 $20,133.71
Department
130 - Finance
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6400.350 - Material & Suppl IT-Computer & Hardware (non-cap) 10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13091
Finance - set
up/migration of Rogers
new laptop
Paid by EFT #
6661
08/31/2025
09/05/2025
09/05/2025
09/12/2025
190.00
Account
6400.350 - Material & Suppl IT-Computer & Hardware (non-cap) Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $190.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $190.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $190.00
Department
130 - Finance
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $190.00
Department
150 - City Attorney
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
292905
City Attorney Services -
July 2025
Paid by EFT #
6660
08/21/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/12/2025
19,120.23
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 2 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
150 - City Attorney
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
292907
Code Enforcement -
July 2025
Paid by EFT #
6660
08/21/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/12/2025
2,993.60
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
292908
City Manager - July
2025
Paid by EFT #
6660
08/21/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/12/2025
4,495.40
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
292909
Human Resources and
Risk - July 2025
Paid by EFT #
6660
08/21/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/12/2025
777.40
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
292910
Finance - July 2025
Paid by EFT #
6660
08/21/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/12/2025
1,521.00
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
292911
Planning
Commission/Developm
ent - July 2025
Paid by EFT #
6660
08/21/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/12/2025
18,486.01
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
292912
Parks - July 2025
Paid by EFT #
6660
08/21/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/12/2025
2,771.60
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
292913
Police Department -
July 2025
Paid by EFT #
6660
08/21/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/12/2025
1,554.80
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
292914
Public Works - July
2025
Paid by EFT #
6660
08/21/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/12/2025
6,084.00
Account
6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $57,804.04
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $57,804.04
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $57,804.04
Department
150 - City Attorney
Totals
Invoice Transactions
9 $57,804.04
Department
190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
Aug 2025 313-6
PG&E 6793435313-6
Paid by Check
# 107718
08/25/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
9,238.30
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $9,238.30
Account
6600.010 - Other Charges Alarm
10239 - First Alarm
903863
City Hall Alarm Service
- Battery Replacement
Zone 10
Paid by EFT #
6657
08/22/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
281.24
Account
6600.010 - Other Charges Alarm
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $281.24
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $9,519.54
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $9,519.54
Department
190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $9,519.54
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 3 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
210 - Police
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10107 - California Towing & Transport
213402
Call # 275337473
Paid by Check
# 107710
08/15/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
412.50
10107 - California Towing & Transport
213140
Towing Service
Paid by Check
# 107710
08/22/2025
09/04/2025
09/04/2025
09/12/2025
195.00
10107 - California Towing & Transport
213859
Flat Change
Paid by Check
# 107710
08/19/2025
09/04/2025
09/04/2025
09/12/2025
150.00
12065 - Hasco Stations, LLC
HCL-037820-25
Car Wash
Paid by Check
# 107712
08/31/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
178.50
10334 - Lexis Nexis Risk Solutions
1100192387
August 2025 Minimum
Commitment
Paid by Check
# 107713
08/31/2025
09/04/2025
09/04/2025
09/12/2025
150.00
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
Totals
Invoice Transactions
5 $1,086.00
Account
6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13053
IT system maintenance
- Starlink 3 months;
Fuel pump and Kennel
Paid by EFT #
6661
08/01/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
390.00
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13082
IT Maintenance: HP
elitedesk; 3 year
warranty; setup /
delivery
Paid by EFT #
6661
08/31/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
1,650.63
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13084
IT maintenance: Latest
model microsoft & set
up (Santana & Cox)
Paid by EFT #
6661
08/31/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
3,410.50
Account
6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint
Totals
Invoice Transactions
3 $5,451.13
Account
6360.344 - Maint & Repairs IT - Office Equip & PC Upgrades 10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13073
IT maintenance: Cox's
scanner
Paid by EFT #
6661
08/31/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025

43.70 Account
6360.344 - Maint & Repairs IT - Office Equip & PC Upgrades Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $43.70
Account
6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
11935 - California Premier Restoration
250809.1
Biohazard Remediation
& Disinfection Marina
PD patrol 8/22/25
Paid by Check
# 107709
08/28/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
750.00
Account
6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $750.00
Account
6370.010 - Shared Svc 911
10411 - Monterey County - Emergency
Communications
09-03-25
Monterey County
Emergency
Communication Quarter
2 Invoice 25/26
Paid by Check
# 107714
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
128,678.12
Account
6370.010 - Shared Svc 911
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $128,678.12
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 4 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
210 - Police
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M
10411 - Monterey County - Emergency
Communications
09-03-25
Monterey County
Emergency
Communication Quarter
2 Invoice 25/26
Paid by Check
# 107714
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
9,955.00
Account
6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $9,955.00
Account
6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip
10580 - Tri County Fire Protection
HP65605A
Dry Chemical
Maintenance Service
ABC
Paid by Check
# 107724
06/20/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025

72.00 Account
6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $72.00
Account
6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
10309 - Salinas Valley Pro Squad
881
Uniform - Bazzola
Paid by Check
# 107720
08/25/2025
09/04/2025
09/04/2025
09/12/2025
1,772.93
10309 - Salinas Valley Pro Squad
880
Uniform - Aguilera
Paid by Check
# 107720
08/23/2025
09/04/2025
09/04/2025
09/12/2025
1,772.93
Account
6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $3,545.86
Account
6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
11408 - Christopher Johnson - Employee
9-14-25
Per Diem Johnson - ICI
Management/Supervisi
on of Detective Units
Paid by EFT #
6655
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
253.00
10935 - South Bay Regional Public Safety
Training Cons.
226041
Crisis Intervention
Training 7/7 -7/11/25 -
Smith; Sievers
Paid by Check
# 107722
08/20/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
180.00
Account
6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $433.00
Account
6600.485 - Other Charges Medical Svc - Investigations
10412 - Monterey County District Attorney
9-04-25
Revised FY 2023/2024
Blood Alcohol Costs -
Marina only
Paid by Check
# 107715
09/04/2025
09/04/2025
09/04/2025
09/12/2025
3,304.33
Account
6600.485 - Other Charges Medical Svc - Investigations
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,304.33
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
18 $153,319.14
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
18 $153,319.14
Department
210 - Police
Totals
Invoice Transactions
18 $153,319.14
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 5 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
250 - Fire
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6370.010 - Shared Svc 911
10411 - Monterey County - Emergency
Communications
09-03-25
Monterey County
Emergency
Communication Quarter
2 Invoice 25/26
Paid by Check
# 107714
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
16,786.63
Account
6370.010 - Shared Svc 911
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $16,786.63
Account
6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M
10411 - Monterey County - Emergency
Communications
09-03-25
Monterey County
Emergency
Communication Quarter
2 Invoice 25/26
Paid by Check
# 107714
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
6,183.25
Account
6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $6,183.25
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $22,969.88
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $22,969.88
Department
250 - Fire
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $22,969.88
Department
310 - Public Works
Division
311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M
10411 - Monterey County - Emergency
Communications
09-03-25
Monterey County
Emergency
Communication Quarter
2 Invoice 25/26
Paid by Check
# 107714
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
2,489.00
Account
6370.535 - Shared Svc NGEN O & M
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,489.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,489.00
Division
311 - Buildings & Grounds
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,489.00
Department
310 - Public Works
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $2,489.00
Department
410 - Planning
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6600.700 - Other Charges Refunds of Fees/Charges
12311 - Ruiqui Chen - refund only
1560
Refund - Alarm Permit
Over payment
Paid by Check
# 107719
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025

16.00 Account
6600.700 - Other Charges Refunds of Fees/Charges
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $16.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $16.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $16.00
Department
410 - Planning
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $16.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 6 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
100 - General Fund
Department
420 - Engineering
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection
10171 - CSG Consultants
62361
Permits/Development
Paid by EFT #
6656
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
10,065.00
10171 - CSG Consultants
62365
PWD Services
Paid by EFT #
6656
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
10,785.00
Account
6300.180 - Prof Svc Eng Svc- Rev Funded Inspection
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $20,850.00
Account
6300.190 - Prof Svc Engineering Svc Interagency
10171 - CSG Consultants
62364
TAMC
Paid by EFT #
6656
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
11,528.00
Account
6300.190 - Prof Svc Engineering Svc Interagency
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $11,528.00
Account
6330.200 - Fee Agr Costs - Engineering
10171 - CSG Consultants
62371
Marina Station
Inspections Phase 1
and 2
Paid by EFT #
6656
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
13,422.00
Account
6330.200 - Fee Agr Costs - Engineering
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $13,422.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $45,800.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $45,800.00
Department
420 - Engineering
Totals
Invoice Transactions
4 $45,800.00
Department
510 - Recreation & Culture
Division
100 - Admin
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
12173 - Andrea Diallo - Employee
10-08-25
CPRS - Director's
Academy
Paid by Check
# 107726
09/09/2025
09/09/2025
09/09/2025
09/12/2025
247.80
Account
6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $247.80
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $247.80
Division
100 - Admin
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $247.80
Division
511 - Youth
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6360.344 - Maint & Repairs IT - Office Equip & PC Upgrades 10897 - TechRx Technology Services
13080
Youth Center
Paid by EFT #
6661
08/31/2025
09/04/2025
09/04/2025
09/12/2025
1,164.24
Account
6360.344 - Maint & Repairs IT - Office Equip & PC Upgrades Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,164.24
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,164.24
Division
511 - Youth
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $1,164.24
Department
510 - Recreation & Culture
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $1,412.04
Fund
100 - General Fund
Totals
Invoice Transactions
55 $352,813.63
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 7 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
110 - Vehicle and Equipment
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6700.130 - Capital Outlay Vehicles
12259 - MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT, INC.
039376
Street Sweeper
Paid by Check
# 107716
07/30/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
346,434.74
Account
6700.130 - Capital Outlay Vehicles
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $346,434.74
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $346,434.74
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $346,434.74
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $346,434.74
Fund
110 - Vehicle and Equipment
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $346,434.74
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 8 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
220 - Gas Tax
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
Aug 2025 313-6
PG&E 6793435313-6
Paid by Check
# 107718
08/25/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
1,006.02
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
Aug 2025 483-6
PG&E - 3982644483-6
Paid by Check
# 107718
08/19/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025
17,661.89
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $18,667.91
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $18,667.91
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $18,667.91
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $18,667.91
Fund
220 - Gas Tax
Totals
Invoice Transactions
2 $18,667.91
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 9 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
233 - Monterey Bay Estates AD
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
Aug 2025 313-6
PG&E 6793435313-6
Paid by Check
# 107718
08/25/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025

10.63 Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10.63
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10.63
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10.63
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10.63
Fund
233 - Monterey Bay Estates AD
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10.63
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 10 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
235 - Cypress Cove II AD
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric
Aug 2025 313-6
PG&E 6793435313-6
Paid by Check
# 107718
08/25/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/12/2025

10.18 Account
6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10.18
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10.18
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10.18
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10.18
Fund
235 - Cypress Cove II AD
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $10.18
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 11 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
422 - Capital Projects - Measure X
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10171 - CSG Consultants
62357
Annual Street
Resurfacing
Paid by EFT #
6656
08/08/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
13,224.00
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $13,224.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $13,224.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $13,224.00
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $13,224.00
Fund
422 - Capital Projects - Measure X
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $13,224.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 12 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
462 - City Capital Projects
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10171 - CSG Consultants
62477
Project Management
Paid by EFT #
6656
08/11/2025
09/02/2025
09/02/2025
09/12/2025
17,550.00
Account
6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $17,550.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $17,550.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $17,550.00
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $17,550.00
Fund
462 - City Capital Projects
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $17,550.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 13 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
555 - Marina Airport
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
292906
Airport - July 2025
Paid by EFT #
6660
08/21/2025
08/25/2025
08/25/2025
09/12/2025
8,799.88
Account
6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $8,799.88
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $8,799.88
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $8,799.88
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $8,799.88
Fund
555 - Marina Airport
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $8,799.88
Grand Totals
Invoice Transactions
63 $757,510.97
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/11/2025 02:15:00 PM

Page 14 of 14 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/12/25
-
09/12/25

Vendor
Invoice No.

Invoice Description
Status
Held Reason
Invoice Date
Due Date
G/L Date
Received Date
Payment Date
Invoice Amount
Fund
758 - Successor Agency Oblig Retiremt
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Division
000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Account
6650.039 - ROPS #39-Bond Trustee Fees
11250 - U.S. Bank
7873138
Admin Fees - Series
2018A/Tax Allocation
Bonds 8/1/25-7/31/26
Paid by Check
# 134
08/25/2025
09/03/2025
09/03/2025
09/05/2025
3,250.00
Account
6650.039 - ROPS #39-Bond Trustee Fees
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Sub-Division
00 - Non-Subdiv
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Division
000 - Non-Div
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Department
000 - Non-Dept
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Fund
758 - Successor Agency Oblig Retiremt
Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Grand Totals
Invoice Transactions
1 $3,250.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 09/05/2025 08:37:27 AM

Page 1 of 1 ends

Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range
09/05/25
-
09/05/25

Agenda Item: 10b(1)
City Council Meeting of
September 16, 2025 MINUTES
Tuesday, September 9, 2025 5:00 P.M. Closed Session

SPECIAL MEETING

CITY COUNCIL

THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON
Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
TELECONFERENCE LOCATION: 1
1004 Saga St.

Glendora, California 91741
1 Note: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(b), this meeting will include teleconference participation by Mayor Bruce C. Delgado from the address above. This Notice and Agenda will be posted at the teleconference location

1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:01 PM

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None received.

4. CLOSED SESSION:
a. Conference with Legal Counsel and Chief of Police: Threat to Public Services or Facilities (Govt. Code §54957(a)). Consultation concerning a threat to critical infrastructure controls or critical infrastructure information relating to cybersecurity.

Other participants may include Risk Manager, cybersecurity consultant(s). b. Conference with Legal Counsel: Anticipated Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)(2)), 1 potential case(s). Based on existing facts and circumstances, there is significant exposure to litigation. Such facts and circumstances creating significant exposure to litigation are not known to potential plaintiff(s).

City Attorney reported out Closed Session: Direction was provided by Council. No reportable action was taken.

5. ADJOURNMENT: the meeting adjourned at 6:05 PM
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
ATTEST:

Liesbeth Visscher, Mayor Pro Tem

Agenda Item: 10b(2)
City Council Meeting of
September 16, 2025

ACTION

MINUTES
Wednesday, September 3, 2025 5:00 P.M. Closed Session
6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR

AGENCY OF THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).

Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
AND
Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM: (City Council, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonprofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Members and Marina Groundwater Sustainability Agency) MEMBERS PRESENT: Jenny McAdams, Brian McCarthy, Kathy Biala, Mayor Pro- Tem/Vice Chair Liesbeth Visscher, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado (Remote) Mayor Delgado requested attending the meeting under the Just Cause provision of AB2449 due to family medical emergency down south. City Attorney determined the “just cause” circumstances were met for this instance.

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None

4. CLOSED SESSION:
a. Conference with Legal Counsel, Anticipated Litigation (Govt. Code §54956.9(d)(4)), 1 potential case. City Council to consider initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(4). b. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)(1)) 2 case(s)
(1) Application of California -American Water Company (U210W) , Application 21-11-024, California Public Utilities Commission. 1 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, September 3, 2025 Page 2

(2) Museum of Handcar Technology v. TAMC and City of Marina , 5:24-CV- 08598, United States District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose Division).
c. Real Property Negotiation (Govt. Code Section 54956.8) i. Property: APNs: 032-312-043 (3044 Del Monte Boulevard) Negotiating Party: Gina Klump, Trustee
Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
ii. Property: APNs: Portion of 031-201-005-000 (Hayes Circle); 032-303-039 (3074 Del Monte Boulevard); 032-303-015 (3070 Del Monte Boulevard) Negotiating David Howell
Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
d. Labor Negotiations
i. UWUA-MEA
ii. Marina Professional Fire Fighters Association
iii. Marina Public Safety Managers Association
iv. Marina Middle Manager Association
v. Directors
a. Assistant City Manager
b. Community Development Director
c. Finance Director
d. Fire Chief v. Police Chief
e. Public Works Director
f. Recreation & Cultural Services Director
City Negotiators: Layne P. Long, City Manager and Employee Relations Officer 6:30 PM - RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN

CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney reported out Closed Session: Mayor Delgado attended the meeting remotely under the just cause provision of AB2449. There was no reportable action taken in closed session.

5. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. The Village Project/Emanyatta Presentation
b. Childhood Cancer Awareness Month Proclamation
c. Woman’s Equality Day Proclamation
d. Sun Street Centers National Recovery Month Proclamation

7. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS:
• Andrea Diallo, Recreation Manager, announced the Multi -Cultural Event on September 20 th from 11:00am -3:00 pm at Vince DiMaggio Park. Marina’s 50 th Anniversary will be on October 18 th from 12:00 -5:00pm on Vista Del Camino. All Inclusive Park Reveal Day Celebration on November 8th from 11:00am-1:00pm at the City Park at the Dunes. 2 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, September 3, 2025 Page 3

• Guido Persicone, Community Development Director announced on November 11 th from 11:0am-4:00pm is the Salute to Veterans Jamboree at the Veterans Transition Center, 220 12th Street, Marina.
• Councilmember McCarthy in terms of the 50th anniversary, we are also hosting a photo contest information on this will be on the 50th Anniversary website soon. • Mayor Pro Tem Visscher announced that all the marina businesses that have a storefront and a business license. They'll receive a letter from the city that they can participate in a cool coupon book. To celebrate the 50th anniversary. Friday, September 5 th, the Marina High School. We'll have the ribbon cutting for their new. Football field around 7:00pm between the two games being played. On Saturday, September 13th, there will be an art festival at the Marina Equestrian Center from 10:00am -4:00pm. On Saturday, October 11 th Cars in the Park. at Vince DiMaggio Park.

8. PUBLIC COMMENT: Any member of the public may comment on any matter within the City Council’s jurisdiction that is not on the agenda. This is the appropriate place to comment on items on the Consent Agenda. Action will not be taken on items not on the agenda. Comments are limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. General public comment may be limited to thirty (30) minutes and/or continued to the end of the agenda. Any member of the public may comment on any matter listed on this agenda at the time the matter is being considered by the City Council. Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.
• Lisa Kinkade spoke about the Salute to Veterans Jamboree being held on November 11, 2025, from 11:00am-4:00pm at the Veterans Transition Center. • Marius Bading spoke about the current fee schedule and the fess associated with dog licensing and kennel fee permits. Spoke about the MMC Section 6.04.120 and definitions and how many dogs you can have under a kennel permit.
• Nancy Amadeo expressed how impressed she is with Glorya Jean Tate Park and asked if there is on opening date or a timeframe for opening.
• Grace Silva -Santella spoke about the meeting currently being held by the Monterey Peninsula Regional Parks District Board and the petition with 206 signatures t itled, Protect Locke Paddon Park. Preserve Marina's coastal heritage. Provided the council a write-up with a link to the petition.
• Mike Moeller spoke about the adoption of Resolution No. 2024 -109, entering into an agreement with EMC Planning to prepare a management plan for Locke Paddon Park. Noted that the EMC Planning Group has not met/completed any of its key tasks. • Denise Turley spoke about residents exiting Preston Park at the roundabouts. It’s a safety issue when entering from a dead start with oncoming speeding traffic. Wanted to know where the bike lanes were.

comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, the Council may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. If an item is pulled for discussion, it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency.

10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and non-controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda may be approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, Council may remove the item from the Consent Agenda and it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items.
a. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Accounts Payable Check Numbers 107459-107595, totaling $5,381,319.03 Accounts Payable Successor Agency EFT 126, totaling $473.75 b. MINUTES: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) July 1, 2025, Regular City Council Meeting – Pulled by McCarthy, becomes agenda item 13d
(2) August 6, 2025, Regular City Council Meeting
c. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: None
d. AWARD OF BID: None
e. CALL FOR BIDS: None
f. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopt position in favor of supporting SB346(Durazo) requiring STR to provide rental listing address to city and provide city audit authority for TOT collected and to publish local license number and TOT certification on STR listing.
(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2025-100, authorizing the release of a Request for Proposals (RFP) to qualified firms for on -call Traffic Signal and Streetlight Maintenance Services.
g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -, and Resolution No. 2025 - (PPSC- NPC), a pproving an agreement with Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc. to provide municipal advisory services related to refinancing the Preston Park Loan; and approving an agreement with Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth, LLP for bond counsel services associated with refinancing the Preston Park Loan, and amending the Fiscal Year 2025 - 26 Preston Park budget by appropriating $180,000 to support the municipal advisory and bond counsel agreements . Pulled by Councilmember McAdams, becomes agenda item 13e
(2) Adopting Resolution No. 202 5-101, authorizing a professional services agreement with Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc. of Fresno, CA for engineering and land surveying services beginning September 15, 2025, h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: None
4 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, September 3, 2025 Page 5

i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE): None
k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS: None
l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING): None
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS: None
Councilmember McCarthy requested to pull agenda item 10b(1) Councilmember McAdams had questions for agenda item 10a, asked about the $9,000 to A -1 Sweepers and asked about the payment to Keyser Marston Association for $11,500 for the Auto Dealership. Supports agenda item 10f(1); and requested to pull agenda item 10g(1) for a separate vote.

VISSCHER/MCCARTHY: TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA MINUS AGEND ITEMS 10b(1) AND 10g(1). Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS: In the Council’s discretion, the applicant/proponent of an item may be given up to ten (10) minutes to speak. All other persons may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak on the matter.
a. Open a public hearing and taking testimony from the public and consider adopting Resolution No. 2025-102, dissolving the Cypress Cove II Landscape Maintenance District (“Landscape District”) and authorize the Finance Director to make the necessary budgetary and accounting entries.

Public Comments:
• Nancy Amadeo noted t here was never anything in the district documents that show a n inflationary clause when we first purchased our home. In 2006-2007 our district was turned over to a neighborhood association , at the guidance of the then -city attorney. The neighborhood association wanted to take care of the trees along Cardoza . They never worked on the trees along Beach or along Abdy and we have complained for years about trying to get something done . N ow homeowners are going to pay a heavy price to get them in good shape. Spoke about the raises council received and that same money for one year could bring all of those trees up to good standing.

VISSCHER/MCADAMS: TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -102, DISSOLVING THE CYPRESS COVE II LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (“LANDSCAPE DISTRICT”) AND AUTHORIZE THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE THE NECESSARY BUDGETARY AND ACCOUNTING ENTRIES. 4-1(McCarthy)-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

b. Open public hearing and consider adopting Resolution No. 2025 -103, amending the City’s Master Fee Schedule to reflect the addition of a new fee for minor address changes.

Public Comments: None received
Council asked if any complaints were received regarding fees. Discussion on fees for adding a new address for ADU’s and staff time. Fees for multiple ADU’s on a single lot. 5 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, September 3, 2025 Page 6

MCADAMS/VISSCHER: TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -103, AMENDING THE CITY’S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF A NEW FEE FOR MINOR ADDRESS CHANGES; AND GIVE DIRECTION THAT WE TRY TO

ELIMINATE OR REDUCE THE FEES TO GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE FOR MULTIPLE ADU’S IN ONE LOCATION. 5-0-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

Note: No additional major projects or programs should be undertaken without review of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006). a. Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -104, a pproving an updated design for the Recreation and Aquatics Center; and approving the use of the Construction Manager-At-Risk public works project delivery method for the Recreation and Aquatics Center project; and authorizing the City Manager to issue a Request for Proposals for CMAR services.

Public Comments:
• Daniel Alvarez, NorCal Carpets Union, Local 646 , discussed how essential apprenticeship, healthcare benefits, fair wages are for carpenters and for the whole construction industry as a whole as well as the challenges and what most important. • Jesus Vega incredibly important to have labor standards language for the recreation and Aquatic Center. Expressed concerns when considering the cost of a project, especially as you weigh the decision to include strong labor standards moving forward. This project falls under prevailing wage requirements, which are set by the Department of Industrial Relations. • Brian Shields Carpenter's Local 646, CMAR is a common process as the dollar value of the project is appropriate, a contractor would be able to meet that and build it out. Spoke about having contractor on board early on, due to arising challenges. Asked for Pre -qualification language for the contractors. Reiterated what prevailing wages mean to a contractor. Asked council to adopt pre-qualification language.
• Tom Moore spoke about apprenticeship programs. In favor of apprenticeship language for this item and to see local people getting paid local wages to work here at home. • Tony Uzzle spoke about the Carpenters Union advocating for workforce development that allowed veterans like me, women and people of color to earn a livable wage. Spoke about wages and benefits receive are the same wages outlined in the California Department of Industrial Relationship. Provided council with a Research Brief by UC Berkeley Labor Center on Public Cost of Low-Wage Jobs in California’s Construction Industry. • Amber Sanford is here to advocate for the pre -qualification language in the RFP. Spoke about what it’s like being in the apprenticeship program and what it would mean to others. 6 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, September 3, 2025 Page 7

• Denise Turley asked about MST Class B buses having enough room to drop their ramps for deliveries and pickups and to be able to negotiate through the parking lot. Supports the Carpenter’s Union request for Fair Labor Standard.

Council discussed the best way to include Labor Standards in the RFP for this item and in future RFP’s. How CMAR process works versus without it. Possibly adding photos of the graffiti in the pool room as part of the art and informational signs to connector building. Cost neutrality of the Aquatic Center and energy efficiency . Asked about maximum occupancy and having plenty of parking. Contingency fees,

VISSCHER/BIALA: MOTION TO APPROVE AN UPDATED DESIGN FOR THE

RECREATION AND AQUATICS CENTER, AND TO APPROVE THE USE OF THE

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER -AT-RISK PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT DELIVERY

METHOD FOR THE RECREATION AND AQUATICS CENTER PROJECT, AND

REQUEST STAFF TO COME BACK TO THE COUNCIL NO LATER THAN THE

SECOND MEETING IN OCTOBER WITH LANGUAGE TO ESTABLISH LABOR

STANDARDS FOR THE RECREATION AND AQUATICS CENTER PROJECT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS . 5-0-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

b. Open a public hearing, take public testimony; and read by title only and introduce Ordinance 2025-, amending the Marina Municipal Code, Title 3, Chapter 3.16 by adding two new sections, 3.16.080 and 3.16.090 - Alternative Project Delivery Method for Public Works Projects.

Public Comments: None received
BIALA/VISSCHER: TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND INTRODUCE ORDINANCE 2025-, AMENDING THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3.16 BY ADDING TWO NEW SECTIONS, 3.16.080 AND 3.16.090 - ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS . 5 -0-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote
c. Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -105, authorizing a professional services agreement with WithersRavenel, Inc. for a Citywide Facilities Condition Assessment and Asset Management Capital Lifecycle Modeling beginning September 15, 2025.

Public Comments: None received
Council discussed if this program can be used on other projects such as art projects the MLK Statue, not just buildings.

VISSCHER/BIALA: TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -105, AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WITHERSRAVENEL, INC. FOR A

CITYWIDE FACILITIES CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT CAPITAL LIFECYCLE MODELING BEGINNING SEPTEMBER 15, 2025 . 5-0-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

7 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Wednesday, September 3, 2025 Page 8

d. July 1, 2025, Regular City Council Meeting – Pulled by Councilmember McCarthy, was agenda item 10b(1)
Communication back and forth between council relating to the motion of item 13b.

Majority of the Council confirmed that the minutes reflect the actions taken for the July 1, 2025 meeting and item 13b.

BIALA/VISSCHER: TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF JULY 1, 2025 . AYES 3 - NOES 2(McAdams, McCarthy)-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

e. Adopting Resolution No. 2025 -106, and Resolution No. 2025 -03 (PPSC- NPC), approving an agreement with Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc. to provide municipal advisory services related to refinancing the Preston Park Loan; and approving an agreement with Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth, LLP for bond counsel services associated with refinancing the Preston Park Loan, and amending the Fiscal Year 2025 -26 Preston Park budget by appropriating $180,000 to support the municipal advisory and bond counsel agreements. Pulled by Councilmember McAdams, was agenda item 10g(1) Public Comments: None received
Council discussed current loan being interest-only and costs of refinancing.

VISSCHER/BIALA: TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -106, AND RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -03 (PPSC -NPC), A PPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PROVIDE MUNICIPAL ADVISORY SERVICES RELATED TO REFINANCING THE PRESTON PARK LOAN; AND APPROVING AN

AGREEMENT WITH STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH, LLP FOR BOND

COUNSEL SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH REFINANCING THE PRESTON PARK LOAN, AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 -26 PRESTON PARK BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $180,000 TO SUPPORT THE MUNICIPAL ADVISORY AND BOND COUNSEL AGREEMENTS. 5-0-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

14. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council reports on meetings and conferences attended ( Gov’t Code Section 53232).

15. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 10:58 PM

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

ATTEST:

Liesbeth Visscher, Mayor Pro Tem
8 September 12, 2025 Item No. 10e(1)
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the Marina City Council September 16, 2025
RECOMMENDATION TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-,

APPROVING ADVERTISING AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE IMJIN PKWY & 3RD AVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 2025-, approving advertising and call for bids for the Imjin Pkwy and 3rd Ave. Intersection Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND:

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has developed a comprehensive Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) that defines goals, objectives, and strategies to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The SHSP requires collab oration with law enforcement, educators, emergency services, and other stakeholders and is a major component of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).

The HSIP is a Federal-aid program that incorporates a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety that focuses on performance. Supporting safety improvement projects consistent with the State’s SHSP, the HSIP finances projects specifically targeting roadway and intersection locations by identifying and implementing countermeasures to improve safety.

A Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) is the local Municipality version of the State SHSP, providing a framework for organizing stakeholders to identify, analyze, and prioritize roadway safety improvements on local and rural roads. The process of developing an LRSP can be tailored to local protocols, needs, and issues. However, safety projects stemming from the plan need to be consistent with Federal and State project funding requirements if those funds will be used for project implementation. Also, the plan shou ld be viewed as a living document that can be continually reviewed and updated to reflect changing local needs and priorities.

On May 4 th, 2021, City Council passed resolution 2021 -37 approving a Caltrans LRSP grant application. The City subsequently received a $40,000 grant, which along with the $5,000 City matching funds paid for the preparation of the LRSP. Staff issued a work order to Kimley-Horn to produce the LRSP under the on-call professional services agreement.

At the regular meeting of August 16, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -108, approving the Local Roadway Safety Plan and the recommended safety improvement projects.

Two of those improvement projects were the Imjin Pkwy & 3rd Ave intersection and the Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd intersection.

The City proceeded to apply for HSIP Grant funding for these two projects as part of the 2023 Grant Cycle 11. Both projects were awarded Grant funding with Preliminary Engineering funding at the end of 2023.
1 At the regular meeting of December 17, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-144, approving an agreement with Kimley Horn and Associates to provide engineering services for the Imjin Pkwy & 3rd Ave Intersection Improvement Project.

ANALYSIS:

The improvement project will provide a new all -way signal-controlled intersection. Intersection improvements will include accessibility ramps, bicycle access for the Class1 Trail and Class 2 bike lanes, adjustments to the center medians, and improved high-visible crosswalks.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to calling for bids. The current budget for this project is approximately $1.1 million. The project’s budget is funded with State Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant Funds and Regional Surface Transportation Program funds.

CEQA Findings:

The City has determined the project exempt from environmental review per § 15301(b) of the CEQA Guidelines for Existing Facilities.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
Edrie Delos Santos, P.E.

Public Works Department
City of Marina
REVIEWED/CONCUR:
____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina
_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina
2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

APPROVING ADVERTISING AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE FOR THE IMJIN PKWY & 3RD AVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has developed a comprehensive Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) that defines goals, objectives, and strategies to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The SHSP requires collabo ration with law enforcement, educators, emergency services, and other stakeholders and is a major component of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and;
WHEREAS, the HSIP is a Federal-aid program that incorporates a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety that focuses on performance. Supporting safety improvement projects consistent with the State’s SHSP, the HSIP finances projects specifically t argeting roadway and intersection locations by identifying and implementing countermeasures to improve safety, and; WHEREAS, a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) is the local Municipality version of the State SHSP, providing a framework for organizing stakeholders to identify, analyze, and prioritize roadway safety improvements on local and rural roads. The process of developing an LRSP can be tailored to local protocols, needs, and issues. However, safety projects stemming from the plan need to be consistent with Federal and State project funding requirements if those funds will be used for project implementation. Also, the plan should be viewed as a living document that can be continually reviewed and updated to reflect changing local needs and priorities, and; WHEREAS, on May 4th, 2021, City Council passed resolution 2021-37 approving a Caltrans LRSP grant application. The City subsequently received a $40,000 grant, which along with the $5,000 City matching funds paid for the preparation of the LRSP. Staff issued a work order to Kimley- Horn to produce the LRSP under the on-call professional services agreement, and; WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of August 16, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-108, approving the Local Roadway Safety Plan and the recommended safety improvement projects. Two of those improvement projects were the Imjin Pkwy & 3rd Ave intersection and the Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd intersection, and;
WHEREAS, the City proceeded to apply for HSIP Grant funding for these two projects as part of the 2023 Grant Cycle 11. Both projects were awarded Grant funding with Preliminary Engineering funding at the end of 2023, and;
WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of December 17, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-144, approving an agreement with Kimley Horn and Associates to provide engineering services for the Imjin Pkwy & 3rd Ave Intersection Improvement Project, and; WHEREAS, the improvement project will provide a new all -way signal-controlled intersection.

Intersection improvements will include accessibility ramps, bicycle access for the Class1 Trail and Class 2 bike lanes, adjustments to the center medians, and improved high-visible crosswalks, and; WHEREAS, there is no fiscal impact to calling for bids. The current budget for this project is approximately $1.1 million. The project’s budget is funded with State Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant Funds and Regional Surface Transportation Program funds, and; 3 Resolution No. 2025-
Page Two
WHEREAS, the City has determined the project exempt from environmental review per § 15301(b) of the CEQA Guidelines for Existing Facilities, and; WHEREAS, the project is ready for advertisement.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby approve advertising and call for bids for the Imjin Pkwy & 3rd Ave Intersection Improvement Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, duly held on the 16th day of September 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 ®
Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

CITY OF MARINA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
IMJIN PARKWAY & 3RD AVENUE
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 11

COVER SHEET

LOCATION MAP
NTS

SHEET NUMBER AND TITLES
IMJIN PARKWAY & 3RD AVENUE INTERSECTION

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

CITY OF MARINA, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CV-01
1 PROJECT
SITE

VICINITY MAP
NTS

ABBREVIATIONS
TO BE SUPPLEMENTED BY THE CITY OF MARINA STANDARD PLANS DATED 2006, CALTRANS REVISED STANDARD PLANS DATED 2024, AND CALIFORNIA MUTCD DATED 2014, REVISION 8

IMJIN PKWY
3RD AVE

EXHIBIT A TO STAFF REPORT
5 September 11, 2025 Item No. 10g(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of September 16, 2025

CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -,

AUTHORIZING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO

WALLACE GROUP OF SAN LUIS OBISPO , CA FOR ENGINEERING

SERVICES FOR UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES AT
THE CITY PARK AT THE DUNES ; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY; AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO
MAKE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND BUGETARY ENTRIES.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 2025-__:

1. Authorizing a professional services agreement with Wallace Group of San Luis Obispo, CA for engineering services in an amount not to exceed $90,000.00 for undergrounding of overhead utilities at the City Park at the Dunes.

2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the agreement on behalf of the City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

BACKGROUND:

The City Park at the Dunes is a major development spanning 13.5 acres, featuring amenities such as an inclusive playground, restroom facilities, tennis and pickleball courts, an exercise center, picnic areas, and walkways. Engineering and landscape design efforts are well underway, with Wallace Group leading the project. Adjacent to the park is the upcoming Recreation & Aquatics Center, which, together with the park, will serve as a significant recreational hub for Marina residents for decades.

Throughout the project planning and design phases, staff have encountered and overcome numerous challenges. Currently, the final remaining obstacle involves a 760-foot overhead utility line operated by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). Future maintenance activities for this line will interfere with public access to park facilities and detract from the aesthetic appeal of the area.

ANALYSIS:

Public Works staff have identified Wallace Group as the most qualified firm to handle the design for the undergrounding of this utility line. Wallace Group has an established history of successful projects within the city, maintains a positive working relationship with Marina, and is actively engaged in the design of both phases of the City Park at the Dunes. The firm possesses specialized expertise in underground utility design and has extensive experience collaborating with PG&E on similar projects.

1 The scope of work for this project will include engineering design, permitting, coordination with PG&E, and construction support for the undergrounding of the utility line. The total cost for these services is proposed at $90,000, which reflects the full s cope of services necessary to complete this critical improvement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed $90,000 expenditure for engineering services will be funded through the project’s allocated budget for the City Park at the Dunes development. Approval of this agreement will enable the project to move forward efficiently, reduce ongoing maintenance and aesthetic concerns associated with overhead lines, and enhance public safety and park accessibility.

EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A – Draft Professional Services Agreement with Wallace Group.

Exhibit B – Wallace Group Proposal and Scope of Services

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF MARINA AUTHORIZING A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO WALLACE GROUP OF SAN

LUIS OBISPO , CA FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR

UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES AT THE CITY PARK AT THE DUNES; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE

TO EXECUTE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW
AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND AUTHORIZING THE

FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND

BUGETARY ENTRIES

WHEREAS, the City of Marina has identified the undergrounding of overhead utilities in the City Park at the Dunes as a critical step to improve public access, safety, and aesthetics; and

WHEREAS, Wallace Group has demonstrated extensive experience and a successful working relationship with the City of Marina, especially in the design and coordination efforts for the City Park at the Dunes project; and

WHEREAS, staff has negotiated a scope of services and a cost proposal for engineering services to design the undergrounding of approximately 760 feet of overhead utility line, in an amount not to exceed $90,000; and

WHEREAS, approval of this agreement is necessary to facilitate timely progress on the project and to secure the improvements that will benefit residents and visitors alike;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Authorize a professional services agreement with Wallace Group of San Luis Obispo, CA for engineering services, in an amount not to exceed $ 90,000.00 for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities at the City Park at the Dunes.

2. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the agreement on behalf of the City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

3. Authorize the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 16th Day of September, 2025 by the following vote:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_______________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
3 1

CITY OF MARINA

AGREEMENT FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SERVICES

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on August 6, 2025, by and between the City of Marina, a California charter city, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and Wallace Group, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as the " Consultant." City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as "party" and collectively as "parties" in this Agreement.

Recitals

A. City desires to retain Consultant to:

Provide engineering services for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities at the City Park at the Dunes, hereinafter referred to as the "Project."

B. Consultant represents that it has the qualifications, experience and personnel necessary to properly perform the services as set forth herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to provide such services.

Terms and Conditions

For of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Consultant agree to the following terms and conditions:

1. Scope of Work.

(a) Consultant is hereby hired and retained by the City to work in a cooperative manner with the City to fully and adequately perform those services set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto (“Scope of Work”) and by this reference made a part hereof. With prior written notice to Consultant, City may elect to delete certain tasks of the Scope of Work at its sole discretion.

(b) Consultant shall perform all such work with skill and diligence and pursuant to generally accepted standards of practice in effect at the time of performance. Consultant shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for work which fails to meet these standards and which is reported to Consultant in writing within sixty days of discovery. Should Consultant fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations under this Agreement, the City may render or undertake the performance thereof and the Consultant shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.

(c) If services under this Agreement are to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined in California Civil Code §2782.8(b)(2), design professional certifies that all design professional services shall be provided by a person or persons duly licensed by the State of California to provide the type of services described in Section 1(a). By delivery of completed work, design professional certifies that the work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state and local laws, and the professional standard of care in California.

4 2

(d) Consultant is responsible for making an independent evaluation and judgment of all relevant conditions affecting performance of the work, including without limitation site conditions, existing facilities, seismic, geologic, soils, hydrologic, geographic, climatic conditions, applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations and all other contingencies or considerations.

(e) City shall cooperate with Consultant and will furnish all information data, records and reports existing and available to City to enable Consultant to carry out work outlined in Exhibit “A." Consultant shall be entitled to reasonably rely on information, data, records and reports furnished by the City, however, the City makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any such information, data, records or reports available to it and provided to Consultant which were furnished to the City by a third party. Consultant shall have a duty to bring to the City's attention any deficiency or error it may discover in any information provided to the Consultant by the City or a third party.

2. Term of Agreement & Commencement of Work.

(a) Unless otherwise provided, the term of this Agreement shall begin on September 16, 2025 and shall expire on June 30, 2027 , unless extended by amendment or terminated earlier as provided herein. The date of full execution is defined as the date when all of the following events have occurred:

(i) This Agreement has been approved by the City's Council or by the board, officer or employee authorized to give such approval; and

(ii) The office of the City Attorney has indicated in writing its approval of this Agreement as to form; and

(iii) This Agreement has been signed on behalf of Consultant by the person or persons authorized to bind the Consultant hereto; and.

(iv) This Agreement has been signed on behalf of the City by the person designated to so sign by the City's Council or by the officer or employee authorized to enter into this Contract and is attested to by the Marina City Clerk.

(b) Consultant shall commence work on the Project on or by September 16, 2025. This Agreement may be extended upon written agreement of both parties. Consultant may be required to prepare a written schedule for the work to be performed, which schedule shall be approved by the City and made a part of Exhibit A, and to perform the work in accordance with the approved schedule.

3. Compensation.

(a) City liability for compensation to Consultant under this Agreement shall only be to the extent of the present appropriation to fund this Agreement. For services to be provided under this Agreement City shall compensate Consultant in an amount not to exceed Ninety Thousand Dollars ($90,000.00) in accordance with the provisions of this Section and the Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference.

(b) Invoice(s) in a format and on a schedule acceptable to the City shall be submitted to and be reviewed and verified by the Project Administrator (see Section 5(a)) and forwarded to the City's Finance Department for payment. City shall notify Consultant of exceptions or disputed items and their dollar value within fifteen days of receipt. Payment of the undisputed 5 3

amount of the invoice will typically be made approximately thirty days after the invoice is submitted to the Finance Department.

(c) Consultant will maintain clearly identifiable, complete and accurate records with respect to all costs incurred under this Agreement on an industry recognized accounting basis.

Consultant shall make available to the representative of City all such books and records related to this Agreement, and the right to examine, copy and audit the same during regular business hours upon 72-hour's notice for a period of four years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

(d) Consultant shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work that is determined by the City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project but which is not included within the Scope of Work and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

(e) Expenses not otherwise addressed in the Scope of Services or the Fee Schedule incurred by Consultant in performing services under this Agreement shall be reviewed and approved in advance by the Project Administrator (Section 5(a)), be charged at cost and reimbursed to Consultant.

(f) There shall be no charge for transportation within Monterey, Santa Cruz and San Benito Counties required for the performance of the services under this Agreement; travel to other locations must be approved in writing and in advance by the City, mileage will be charged at the then current standard rate for business travel as set by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service for such approved travel.

4. Termination or Suspension.

(a) This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by either party in the event of a substantial failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement through no fault of the terminating party, provided that no termination may be effected unless the other party is given (1) not less than ten days written notice of intent to terminate, and (2) provided an opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination.

(b) If termination for default is effected by the City, an equitable adjustment in the price provided for in this Agreement shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed services or other work, and (2) any payment due the Consultant at the time of termination may be adjusted to cover any additional costs to the City because of the Consultant's default. If after the termination for failure of Consultant to fulfill its contractual obligations, it is determined that the Consultant had not failed to fulfill contractual obligations, the termination shall be deemed to have been for the convenience of the City.

(c) The City may terminate or suspend this Agreement at any time for its convenience upon not less than thirty days prior written notice to Consultant. Not later than the effective date of such termination or suspension, Consultant shall discontinue all affected work and deliver all work product and other documents, whether completed or in progress, to the City.

(d) If termination for default is effected by the Consultant or if termination for convenience is effected by the City, the equitable adjustment shall include a reasonable profit for services or other work performed. The equitable adjustment for termination shall provide for payment to the Consultant for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to the termination, 6 4

in addition to termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by Consultant relating to written commitments that were executed prior to the termination.

5. Project Administrator, Project Manager & Key Personnel.

(a) City designates as its Project Administrator , Ismael Hernandez, who shall have the authority to act for the City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator or his/her authorized representative shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to the work to be performed pursuant to this Agreement.

(b) Consultant designates, Kari Wagner, as its Project Manager who shall coordinate all phases of the Project. The Project manager shall be available to City at all reasonable times during the Agreement term.

(c) Consultant warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement. Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of its personnel assigned to the performance of services upon written request of City. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the work under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of the City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause.

6. Delegation of Work.

(a) If Consultant utilizes any sub consultants, consultants, persons, employees or firms having applicable expertise to assist Consultant in performing the services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain City's prior written approval to such employment.

Consultant's contract with any sub consultant shall contain a provision making the subcontract subject to all provisions of this Agreement. Consultant will be fully responsible and liable for payment for, administration, completion, presentation, and quality of all work performed. If such persons are utilized, they shall be charged at cost. City reserves its right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

(b) If the work hereunder is performed by a design professional, design professional shall be directly involved with performing the work or shall work through his, her or its employees. The design professional's responsibilities under this Agreement shall not be delegated. The design professional shall be responsible to the City for acts, errors or omissions of his, her or its subconsultants. Negligence of subconsultants or agents retained by the design professional is conclusively deemed to be the negligence of the design professional if not adequately corrected by the design professional. Use of the term sub consultant in any other provision of this Agreement shall not be construed to imply authorization for a design professional to use sub consultants for performance of any professional service under this Agreement.

(c) The City is an intended beneficiary of any work performed by a sub consultant for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subconsultant and the City.

7. Skill of Employees . Consultant shall ensure that any employees or agents providing services under this Agreement possess the requisite skill, training and experience to properly perform such services.

7 5

8. Confidential and Proprietary Information. In the course of performing services under this Agreement Consultant may obtain, receive, and review confidential or proprietary documents, information or materials that are and shall remain the exclusive property of the City.

Should Consultant undertake the work on behalf of other agencies, entities, firms or persons relating to the matters described in the Scope of Work, it is expressly agreed by Consultant that any such confidential or proprietary information or materials shall not be provided or disclosed in any manner to any of Consultant’s other clients, or to any other third party, without the City’s prior express written consent.

9. Ownership of Data . Unless otherwise provided for herein, all documents, material, data, drawings, plans, specifications, computer data files, basis for design calculations, engineering notes, and reports originated and prepared by Consultant, or any sub consultant of any tier, under this Agreement shall be and remain the property of the City for its use in any manner it deems appropriate. Consultant agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant to this Agreement shall be vested in the City and waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or intellectual property rights in favor of the City. Consultant shall provide two (2) sets of reproducible of the above -cited items, except for the computer data files which shall consist of one (1) set. Consultant shall use all reasonable efforts to ensure that any electronic files provided to the City will be compatible with the City's computer hardware and software. Consultant makes no representation as to long -term compatibility, usability or readability of the format resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems or computer hardware differing from those in use by the City at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall be permitted to maintain copies of all such data for its files.

City acknowledges that its use of the work product is limited to the purposes contemplated by the Scope of Work and, should City use these products or data in connection with additions to the work required under this Agreement or for new work without consultation with and without additional compensation to Consultant, Consultant makes no representation as to the suitability of the work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the Scope of Work and shall have no liability or responsibility whatsoever in connection with such use which shall be at the City's sole risk. Any and all liability arising out of changes made by the City to Consultant's deliverables is waived against Consultant unless City has given Consultant prior written notice of the changes and has received Consultant's written consent to such changes.

10. Conflict of Interest.

(a) Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of the City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subconsultant without the express written consent of the City Manager. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of the City in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall represent the interest of the City in any discussion or negotiation.

(b) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant may be, as of the date of commencement of services under this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Consultant is unaware of any stated position of the City relative to such projects. Any future position of the City on such projects may result in a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.

11. Disclosure. Consultant may be subject to the appropriate disclosure requirements of the California Fair Political Practices Act, as determined by the City Manager. 8 6

12. Non-Discrimination.

(a) During the performance of this Agreement the Consultant and its subconsultants shall comply with the applicable laws of the United States of America, the State of California and the City prohibiting discrimination and harassment. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate, harass, or allow harassment, against any employee or applicant for employment because of gender, gender expression, gender identity, genetic characteristics, sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), medical condition (including cancer), mental disability, age, marital status, denial of family and medical care leave and denial of pregnancy disability leave , sexual orientation, military/veteran status and any other characteristics protected by state or federal law.

Consultant shall give written notice of its obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which it has a collective bargaining or other agreement. (b) Consultant shall include the provisions of this Section 12(a) in all subcontracts related to this Agreement.

13. Indemnification.

(a) Other than in the performance of design professional services by a design professional, which shall be solely as addressed by subsection (b) below, and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, immediately defend (with independent counsel reasonably acceptable to the City) and hold harmless the City, its Council, boards, commissions, employees, officials and agents (collectively "Indemnified Parties" or in the singular "Indemnified Party") from and against any claims, losses, damages, penalties, fines and judgments, associated investigation and administrative expenses, and defense costs including but not limited to reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, expert witness fees and costs of alternate dispute resolution (collectively "Liabilities“), where same arise out of the performance of this Agreement by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and sub - consultants. The duty to defend is a separate and distinct obligation from the Consultant’s duty to indemnify and Consultant shall be obligated to defend in all legal, equitable, administrative or special proceedings upon tender to the Consultant of any claim in any form or at any stage of an action or proceeding, whether or not liability is established and the obligation extends through final judgment including exhaustion of any appeals.. The Consultant’s obligation to indemnify applies unless it is finally determined that the liability was caused by the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of an indemnified party. If it is finally determined that liability is caused by the comparative active negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party, the Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be reduced in proportion to the established comparative liability of the indemnified party.

(b) To the fullest extent permitted by law (including without limitation California Civil Code Sections 2782.8), when the services to be provided under this Agreement are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined by said section 2782.8(c)(2) (“Design Professional”) Design Professional shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless any Indemnified Party for all Liabilities regardless of nature or type that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Design Professional, or such acts or omissions of an officer, employee, agent or sub contractor of the Design Professional, in the performance of professional services provided to the city . Design Professional shall not have an immediate duty to defend an Indemnified Party, however, Design Professional’s obligation to indemnify (including reimbursing the cost to defend) and hold the Indemnified Parties harmless applies unless it is finally determined that the liability was caused by the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party. If it is finally 9 7

determined that liability was caused by the comparative active negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party as adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Design Professional’s indemnification obligation shall be reduced in direct proportion to the indemnified party’s proportionate percentage of fault. Within 30 days following Design Professional’s receipt of a properly presented written invoice Design Profession al shall satisfy its indemnification obligations and reimburse the Indemnified Party for the cost of reasonable attorney’s fees and defense costs incurred by the Indemnified Party to the same extent of Design Professional’s indemnity obligation herein. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Design Professional exceed the Design Professional’s proportionate percentage of fault.

(c) The provisions of this Section are not limited by the provisions of sections relating to insurance including provisions of any worker's compensation act or similar act. Consultant expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statues or laws as to City, its employees and officials. An allegation or determination of comparative active negligence or willful misconduct by an Indemnified Party unrelated to design professional services does not relieve Consultant from its separate and distinct obligation to defend City. Consultant agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every subconsultant, sub tier consultant or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance or subject matter of this Agreement. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder.

(d) If any action or proceeding is brought against any Indemnified Party by reason of any of the matters against which the Consultant has agreed to provide an immediate defense to any Indemnified Party, as provided above, Consultant, upon notice from the City, shall defend the Indemnified Party at Consultant's expense by independent counsel reasonably acceptable to the City. Unless otherwise provided above, an Indemnified Party need not have first paid for any of the matters to which it is entitled to indemnification in order to be so defended.

Consultant may submit a claim to the City for reasonable defense costs (including attorney’s and expert fees) incurred in providing a defense of any Indemnified Party to the extent such defense costs arise under principals of comparative fault from the Indemnified Party’s active negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct.

(e) This obligation to indemnify and defend, as set forth herein, is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this Section.

14. Insurance.

(a) As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement and without limiting Consultant's indemnification of the City, Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect at its own expense the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit “ B” “Insurance” attached hereto and made a part hereof. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates of insurance, executed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, along with copies of all required endorsements. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the City before any work commences. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney and Risk Manager as to form and content. Specifically, such insurance shall: (1) be endorsed to protect City as an additional insured for commercial general and business auto liability; (2) provide City prior notice of cancellation ; and (3) be primary with respect to City's insurance program. Consultant's insurance is not expected to respond to claims that may arise from the acts or omissions of the City. 10 8

(b) City reserves the right at any time during the term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required herein by giving Consultant ninety days advance written notice of such change. If such change should result in substantial additional cost of the Consultant, City agrees to negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City.

(c) All required insurance must be submitted and approved the City Attorney and Risk Manager prior to the inception of any operations by Consultant.

(d) The required coverage and limits are subject to availability on the open market at reasonable cost as determined by the City. Non availability or non affordability must be documented by a letter from Consultant's insurance broker or agency indicating a good faith effort to place the required insurance and showing as a minimum the names of the insurance carriers and the declinations or quotations received from each. Within the foregoing constraints, Consultant's failure to procure or maintain required insurance during the entire term of this Agreement shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement under which City may immediately suspend or terminate this Agreement or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance to protect City's interests and pay any and all premium in connection therewith and recover all monies so paid from Consultant.

(e) By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 et seq ., of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provision of that Code, and that it will comply with such provisions at all such times as they may apply during the performance of the work pursuant to this Contract. Unless otherwise agreed, a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City is required.

15. Independent Consultant. The parties agree that Consultant, its officers, employees and agents, if any, shall be independent consultants with regard to the providing of services under this Agreement, and that Consultant's employees or agents shall not be considered to be employees or agents of the City for any purpose and will not be entitled to any of the benefits City provides for its employees. City shall make no deductions for payroll taxes or Social Security from amounts due Consultant for work or services provided under this Agreement.

This Agreement shall not constitute, and it is not intended to constitute, either party as an employer, employee, agent, partner or legal representative of the other party for any purpose, or give either party any right to supervise or direct the functions of the other party. Except as specifically provided herein, n either party shall have authority to act for or obligate the other party in any way or to extend any representation on behalf of the other party. Each party agrees to perform under this Agreement solely as an independent consultant and neither party shall have any right, power, or authority, nor shall they represent themselves as having any authority to assume, create, or incur any expense, liability or obligation, express or implied, on behalf of the other party for any purpose. Each party agrees not to permit its employees or agents to do anything that might be construed or interpreted as acts of the other party.

16. Claims for Labor and Materials . Consultant shall promptly pay when due all amounts payable for labor and materials furnished in the performance of this Agreement, so as to prevent any lien or other claim under any provision of law from arising against any City property (including reports, documents, and other tangible matter produced by the Consultant hereunder), against the Consultant's rights to payments hereunder, or against the City, and shall pay all amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such labor.

11 9

17. Discounts. Consultant agrees to offer the City any discount terms that are offered to its best customers for the goods and services to be provided herein, and apply such discounts to payment made under this Agreement which meet the discount terms.

18. Cooperation; Further Acts . The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

19. Dispute Resolution . If any dispute arises between the parties as to proper interpretation or application of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet and confer in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter between themselves. If the dispute is not resolved by meeting and conferring, the matter shall be submitted for formal mediation to a mediator selected mutually by the parties. The expenses of such mediation shall be shared equally between the parties. If the dispute is not or cannot be resolved by mediation, the parties may mutually agree (but only as to those issues of the matter not resolved by mediation) to submit their dispute to arbitration. Before commencement of the arbitration, the parties may elect to have the arbitration proceed on an informal basis; however, if the parties are unable so to agree, then the arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. The decision of the arbitrator shall be binding, unless within thirty days after issuance of the arbitrator’s written decision, any party files an action in court. Venue and jurisdiction for any such action between the parties shall lie in the Superior Court for the County of Monterey.

20. Compliance with Laws.

(a) Each party's performance hereunder shall comply with all applicable laws of the United States of America, the State of California and the City including but not limited to laws regarding health and safety, labor and employment, wage and hours and licensing laws which affect employees. This Agreement shall be governed by, enforced and interpreted under the laws of the State of California. Consultant must be in good standing and registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with California labor Code section 1725.5 and shall comply with new, amended or revised laws, regulations or procedures that apply to the performance of this Agreement.

(b) If the Project is a "public work," or prevailing wages are otherwise required, Consultant shall comply with all provision of California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. , as applicable, and laws dealing with prevailing wages, apprentices and hours of work.

(c) Consultant represents that it has obtained and presently holds all permits and licenses necessary for performance hereunder, including a Business License required by the City's Business License Ordinance (Title 5 of the Marina Municipal Code) for which a business license tax is prescribed and assessed at the rate of two -tenths percent of gross receipts, in accordance with the provisions therein. For the term covered by this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain or obtain as necessary, such permits and licenses and shall not allow them to lapse, be revoked or suspended.

21. Assignment or Transfer. This Agreement or any interest herein may not be assigned, hypothecated or transferred, either directly or by operation of law, without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

12 10

22. Notices. All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, sent by facsimile ("fax") or certified mail, postage prepaid with return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

To City: City Manager
City of Marina City Hall
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California 93933
Fax: (831) 384-9148

To Consultant:

Fax ( ) _____________

The parties my agree in writing to receive notice by email. Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile or, if mailed, three days after deposit in the custody of the U.S. Postal Service. A copy of any notice sent as provided herein shall also be delivered to the Project Administrator and Project Manager.

23. Amendments, Changes or Modifications . This Agreement is not subject to amendment, change or modification except by a writing signed by the authorized representatives of City and Consultant.

24. Force Majeure . Notwithstanding any other provisions hereof, neither Consultant nor City shall be held responsible or liable for failure to meet their respective obligations under this Agreement if such failure shall be due to causes beyond Consultant's or the City's control except that an economic downturn of any type shall not be a justifiable cause for the failure to meet their respective obligations under this Agreement. Such causes include but are not limited to: strike, fire, flood, civil disorder, act of God or of the public enemy, act of the federal government, or any unit of state of local government in either sovereign or contractual capacity, epidemic, quarantine restriction, or delay in transportation to the extent that they are not caused by the party's willful or negligent acts or omissions, and to the extent that they are beyond the party's reasonable control.

25. Attorney's Fees . In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party reasonable expenses, attorney's fees and costs.

26. Successors and Assigns. All of the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall apply to and bind the respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to affect the limitation on assignment

27. Authority to Enter Agreement . Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective party.

28. Waiver. A waiver of a default of any term of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding default or as a waiver of the provision itself. A party's performance after the other party's default shall not be construed as a waiver of that default. 13 11

29. Severability. Should any portion of this Agreement be determined to be void or unenforceable, such shall be severed from the whole and the Agreement will continue as modified.

30. Construction, References, Captions . Since the parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. The captions of the various sections are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement.

31. Advice of Counsel. The parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms and conditions of this Agreement, and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Agreement is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the parties hereto. This Agreement shall not be construed in favor or against either party by reason of the extent to which each party participated in the drafting of this Agreement.

32. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

33. Time. Time is of the essence in this contract.

34. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the matters as set forth in this Agreement, and no other agreement, statement or promise made by or to any party or by or to any employee, officer or agent of any party, which is not contained in this Agreement shall be binding or valid.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Consultant and the City by their duly authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement, on the date first set forth above, at Marina, California.

CITY OF MARINA CONSULTANT

By: By:

Name: Name: ___ ____________ Its: Its: ___________________ Date: _______________________ Date: ___________________

Attest: (Pursuant to Reso: 20 - _____)

By:

City Clerk

Approved as to form:

By:

City Attorney
14 INSERT EXHIBIT A

Section 1 (a)

- SCOPE OF WORK -

[Include Work Schedule if required.]

A-1
15 EXHIBIT B - INSURANCE

Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE

Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non -owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (Not required if Consultant provides written verification it has no employees)

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriates to Consultant’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.

If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

Additional Insured Status
City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used).

Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies.

16 Umbrella or Excess Policy
Consultant may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non -contributory, additional insured, Self -Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until Consultant’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.

Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

Waiver of Subrogation
Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. The CGL and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subject to a self -insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 unless approved in writing by City. Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant or subconsultant who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City may deduct from any amounts otherwise due Consultant to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self -insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the City. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.

Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:

1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

3. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.
17 Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL and any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.

However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

Subconsultants
Consultant shall require and verify that all sub consultants maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subconsultants.

Duration of Coverage
CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of five (5) years for Completed Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

1848503.1
18 July 28, 2025
Ismael Hernandez
City of Marina
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California 93933
Subject: Dunes Park Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities Dear Ismael Hernandez :

Wallace Group appreciates the opportunity to provide you with our proposal for engineering services for the above referenced project. Based on our discussion, the following Scope of Services has been prepared for your consideration:

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City is interested in removing the remaining portions of overhead utilities within property that will be developed as Dunes Park. This includes up to 4 poles and approximately 760’ of overhead lines.

Wallace Group proposes to support this City in this endeavor by providing utility coordination, preparing Plans Specs and Cost Estimate (PS&E) for the joint trench, and providing engineering support during the bidding phase of the project. It is our understanding that a topographic survey covering the area of work has been performed in recent years, and that additional survey will not be necessary for this project. Furthermore, environmental surveys and/or

EXHIBIT B
19 PP25-8525
City of Marina
July 28, 2025

Page 2 of 4 ends

remediation efforts are not considered as part of this proposal, as those have been performed previously as part of the City’s blight removal project in this area.

It is our understanding that the City has not yet submitted an application to PG&E for this project and it is unclear at this time as to whether it would be considered a Rule 20A or Rule 20B project. For the purposes of this proposal, we have assumed that this project will fall under Rule 20B as this is likely the quicker process between the two. If the project is determined to be a Rule 20A project, then additional budget may be needed to cover our services over the longer timeframe.

The undergrounding design should aim to compliment the future Dunes Park development plans, as it relates to vault locations, trench restoration, etc.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Project Management, Meetings, and QA/QC
Wallace Group will perform the necessary day-to-day project management tasks to keep the project moving forward during the design phase and bid. This proposal assumes monthly meetings with pertinent stakeholders throughout the duration of the planning/design process, however actual meeting needs will vary. For the purpose of this proposal, we are assuming a timeline of 18-24 months for project planning, design, and bidding. We will submit monthly schedule updates. Wallace Group will perform internal QA/QC for the 90% and 100% PS&E submittals.

Utility Coordination
Wallace Group will act as lead coordinator between all overhead utilities (PG&E, AT&T, and Comcast) and the City. We will start by contacting the PG&E’s Rule 20 liaison to discuss the project and application, and we will work with the City and PG&E to determine the application approach that best suits the project. Wallace Group will prepare and submit the PG&E application on behalf of the City. Once the application has been submitted/accepted and a preliminary design is prepared/provided by PG&E, we will engage with AT&T and Comcast to obtain their designs for the underground substructure. Wallace Group will review each utility company’s proposed design and contract with the City and will assist with any subsequent discussions between the City and utility companies during the design phase. We have assumed (1) site visit with utility company representatives for design coordination purposes.

Joint Trench Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate (PS&E) After all utility companies have provided their preliminary substructure designs, Wallace Group will compile them into a single set of ‘joint trench’ plans, which will define trench and vault/box locations, general construction notes, relevant requirements of the affected utilities, typical details, and trench sections. Traffic control plans are not anticipated for this project.

Along with the plans, Wallace Group will prepare a set of technical specifications and an Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost for the substructure construction. The technical specifications will be prepared in CSI format, to be attached as Technical Provisions to the City’s standard bidding ‘front end’ documents and general provisions. Wallace Group can prepare front end documents if needed as an additional service, however for the purpose of this proposal we have assumed that the City will prepare the bulk of the front end bidding documents.

EXHIBIT B
20 PP25-8525
City of Marina
July 28, 2025

Page 3 of 4 ends

The PS&E will be submitted to the City for review at 50%, 90%, and 100% IFC progress stages, which are anticipated to include the following
50% Progress –
o Plans will show topographic mapping (already completed by Wallace Group), existing utilities mapping (based on utility A-letter responses or other available data), proposed joint trench route, proposed vault locations, typical trench restoration details.
o Technical Specifications Table of Contents
o Suggested list of bid items
90% Progress* –
o Plans will include cover and general notes, pertinent utility requirements, trench sections, and construction details.
o Technical Specifications
o Draft Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 100% Issued for Bid –
o Stamped & Signed Plans
o Stamped & Signed Technical Specifications
o Final Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost *Note that the 90% plans will also be submitted to PG&E for composite review Engineering Services during Bidding
Wallace Group will attend an in-person pre-bid meeting with prospective bidders and representatives of the City. Wallace Group will respond to pre-bid RFIs as needed during the bidding process. For the purpose of this proposal, we have assumed a total of 10 pre-bid RFIs.

Following the bid opening, Wallace Group will perform and analysis of the bids and present our recommendations

SCHEDULE
Wallace Group anticipates a duration of 18-24 months for the planning, design, and bidding phases of this project, however the pace of the project will be highly dependent upon PG&E’s representative’s responsiveness and their design team’s queue. We will endeavor to perform regular check-ins with each utility company while they are working on their respective designs, to attempt to maintain progress.

ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following services may also benefit your project. Wallace Group can provide these services, directly or through sub-consultants, however, they are not included in the current Scope of Services or estimate of fees:

Topographic / Boundary survey (already completed by Wallace Group) Potholing
Environmental services
Engineering services during construction
Construction management services

EXHIBIT B
21 PP25-8525
City of Marina
July 28, 2025

Page 4 of 4 ends

PROJECT FEES
Wallace Group will perform the services denoted in the proposed Scope of Services in accordance with the attached Standard Billing Rates (Exhibit A). These services will be invoiced monthly on an accrued cost basis, and our total fees, including reimbursables will not exceed our estimated fee of $90,000 without receiving written authorization from the Client.

At your request, additional services to the Scope of Services will be performed by Wallace Group following the signature of our Contract Amendment or the initiation of a new contract.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
In order to convey a clear understanding of the matters related to our mutual responsibilities regarding this proposal, our master services agreement with the City of Marina dated March 4, 2025 is considered a part of our proposal agreement. If this proposal meets with your approval, please sign where indicated and return to our office, which will serve as our notice-to-proceed.

We want to thank you for this opportunity to present our proposal for professional services. If you would like to discuss this proposal in greater detail, please feel free to contact me or Project Manager, Erik Rutherford.

Sincerely,
WALLACE GROUP, a California Corporation TERMS AND CONDITIONS ACCEPTED:

Erik Rutherford, PE C86188, ME 36487 ____________________________________ Senior Mechanical Engineer Signature
612 Clarion Court ____________________________________
San Luis Obispo Printed Name
California 93401 ____________________________________
T 805 544-4011 Title
F 805 544-4294 ____________________________________
www.wallacegroup.us Date
Attachments
GGM: PP25-8525, 2025
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
THIS PROPOSAL IS VALID FOR 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS DOCUMENT.

EXHIBIT B
22 Exhibit A
Standard Billing Rates
Engineering, Design & Support Services:

Assistant Designer/Technician ........................................ $128 Designer/Technician I – IV ............................................. $132/$142/$152/$162 Senior Designer/Technician I – III..................................... $172/$179/$186 GIS Technical Specialist................................................ $167 Senior GIS Technical Specialist ....................................... $178 Associate Engineer I – III ............................................... $140/$150/$160 Engineer I – IV ........................................................... $178/$183/$188/$193 Senior Engineer I - III ................................................... $210/$218/$225 Director .................................................................. $228 Principal Engineer/Consulting Engineer ............................. $255 Principal.................................................................. $280 Surveying Services:

Party Chief............................................................... $190 Party Chief (*Prevailing Wage)........................................ $250 Instrument Person ...................................................... $133 Instrument Person (*Prevailing Wage) ............................... $150 Associate Survey Technician .......................................... $125 Survey Technician I – IV ................................................ $140/$145/$155/$160 Land Surveyor I – III ..................................................... $170/$180/$190 Senior Land Surveyor I - III............................................. $198/$203/$208 Director .................................................................. $228 Principal Surveyor ...................................................... $255 Principal.................................................................. $280 Construction/Program Management and Inspection Services:

Construction Office Tech I-III.......................................... $125/$135/$145 Construction Inspector I-IV ............................................ $150/$155/$160/$165 Senior Construction Inspector ........................................ $170 Construction Inspector (*Prevailing Wage) .......................... $185 Assistant Construction/ Program Manager I - II ..................... $165/$170 Construction/ Program Manager I-III ................................. $175/$180/$185 Senior Construction/ Program Manager I - II ........................ $195/$200 Assistant Resident Engineer I - II...................................... $175/$180 Resident Engineer I-III.................................................. $185/$190/$195 Senior Resident Engineer I-II .......................................... $205/$210 Director .................................................................. $228 Principal Construction Manager....................................... $253 Principal.................................................................. $280 Support Services:

Office Assistant ......................................................... $120 Project Assistant I – III.................................................. $130/$135/$145 WALLACE GROUP 1
2025 Standard Billing Rates

EXHIBIT B
23 *Prevailing Wage:

State established prevailing wage rates will apply to some services based on state law, prevailing wage rates are subject to change over time and geographic location.

Right to Revisions:

Wallace Group reserves the right to revise our standard billing rates on an annual basis, personnel classifications may be added as necessary.

Additional Professional Services:

Fees for expert witness preparation, testimony, court appearances, or depositions will be billed at the rate of $400 an hour. If required to meet schedule requests, overtime on a project will be billed at 1.5 times the employee’s typical hourly rate.

Direct Expenses:

Direct expenses will be invoiced to the client and a handling charge of 15% may be added.

Sample direct expenses include, but are not limited to the following:
travel expenses sub-consultant services agency fees
delivery/copy services mileage (per IRS rates) other direct expenses Invoicing and Interest Charges:

Invoices are submitted monthly on an accrued cost basis. A finance charge of 1.5% per month may be assessed on all balances that are thirty days past due.

WALLACE GROUP 2
2025 Standard Billing Rates

EXHIBIT B
24 M

ST HIGHLIGHTS
Board of Directors Meeting
September 8, 2025

RECOGNIZED AUGUST EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH
The MST Board adopted Resolution 2026-04 recognizing Greg Burchell, Operations Supervisor, as the August 2025 Employee of the Month for his outstanding contribution to MST and the entire community.

RECOGNIZED SEPTEMBER EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH
The MST Board adopted Resolution 2026-05 recognizing Kelly Soriano, Mobility Specialist, as the September 2025 Employee of the Month for her outstanding contribution to MST and the entire community.

APPROVED AMMENDMENT #1 TO TAMC MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING The MST approved Amendment #1 to the memorandum of understanding (MOU) among the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC), the City of Salinas, and MST regarding use of the Salinas Intermodal Transportation Center.

APPROVED DISPOSAL OF THIRTEEN MST SURPLUS VEHICLES
The MST approved a list of thirteen (13) MST-owned vehicles as surplus property and directed staff to dispose of the vehicles using the most economical method available.

APPPOINTED MOBILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER
The MST Board appointed Thomas De La Cruz to the Mobility Advisory Committee for a 3-year term.

RATIFIED COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREMENT BETWEEN ATU AND MST The MST Board ratified the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1225 (ATU) employees and the Monterey-Salinas Transit District (MST).

RECEIVED MST LAND UTILIZATION STUDY
The MST Board received a presentation on an MST Land Utilization Study and provided direction to staff.

Agenda Item: 10j(1)
September 16, 2025

AWARDED CONTRACT FOR GENERAL COUNSEL AND SPECIAL COUNSEL

SERVICES
The MST Board authorized the General Manager/CEO or their designee to enter into a five (5) year contract with De Lay and Laredo for general counsel and labor negotiations, and a five (5) year non-exclusive contract with Hanson Bridgett for special counsel services, both with the option to extend for two (2) additional one (1) year terms.

NEXT MST BOARD MEETING
The next regular MST Board meeting is scheduled for October 13, 2025.

ORDINANCE NO. 2025-13

AN ORDINANCE AMENDINNG THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE (MMC), TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3.16, BY ADDING TWO NEW SECTIONS 3.16.080 AND 3.16.090 ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS.

THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS;

1. The City of Marina is a charter city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution and pursuant to the authority granted to the City pursuant to Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution and City of Marina Charter Article I, Section 1.01 the City of Marina may adopt and enforce ordinances and regulations in respect to municipal affairs.

2. The City of Marina Charter Article 2, Section 2.05 grants the City the power to establish standards, procedures, rules and regulations to regulate all aspects of the bidding, award and performance of any City public works contracts.

3. The City has determined that providing flexibility in the delivery method of public works contracts is in the best interest of the City.

4. Title 3, Chapter 3.16 of the Marina Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Sections

3.16.080 and 3.16.090 to read as set forth in the attached Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.

5. The proposed Ordinance is not subject to environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3) because the proposed procedural changes would not result in a direct or reasonabl y foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and the proposed ordinance is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have potential for causing significant effects on the environment. Therefore, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from CEQA, and no further environmental review is necessary.

6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

7. Severability. If any portion of this Ordinance is found to be unconstitutional or invalid, the City Council hereby declares that it would have enacted the remainder of this Ordinance regardless of the absence of any such invalid part.

8. Posting of ordinance. With fifteen (15) days after the passage of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted in the three (3) public places designated by resolution of the City Council.

Agenda Item: 10L(1)
City Council Meeting of
September 16, 2025

The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on September 3, 2025, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting duly held on September 16, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

__________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

Exhibit A

CHAPTER 3.16

PURCHASING SYSTEM

3.16.080 Alternative Project Delivery Methods for Public Works Contracts

A. The city council may approve the following alternative project delivery methods for the procurement, design, construction, improvement, repair, maintenance, and/or operation of a public works project: design -build, construction manager at -risk, or other proje ct delivery methods.

B. Alternative project delivery methods may be used for projects that are valued at more than $1 million and for projects that are valued at less than $1 million if recommended by the city manager, and that meet at least one of the criteria in both of the following subsections (1) and (2), such that the selected method is in the best interests of the city:

1. The project:
a. Has a high level of technical complexity;
b. Calls for expertise that city staff does not possess; c. Has a scope of work and technical requirements that are difficult to define; d. Benefits from early contractor involvement;
e. Calls for a high level of risk management;
f. Has complex phasing for implementation;
g. Calls for overall schedule acceleration;
h. Calls for value engineering or other solutions to reduce construction costs or to improve function, quality, performance, or sustainability; i. Has budget constraints requiring construction cost guarantees; and/or j. Contemplates a third party operating, managing, maintaining, or servicing the building, facility, or infrastructure after the project's completion.

2. The alternative project delivery method is anticipated to:
a. Minimize the project delivery time;
b. Accelerate the start of project revenue;
c. Minimize the project's cost;
d. Maximize the project's budget; and/or
e. Improve the project's quality or functionality.

C. City council approval of an alternative project delivery method is required for the use of a competitive selection procedure seeking proposals for an alternative project delivery method.

D. Competitive Selection Procedures.

1. The solicitation shall include the scope and needs of a project, selection method, and selection factors and relative weight of those factors.

2. The following competitive selection processes may be used:
a. Request for qualifications;
b. Request for proposals; or
c. Request for alternative technical proposals.

E. Contract Award.

1. The contract shall be awarded by the city council to the best value proposer.

F. Definitions:

1. "Alternative project delivery method" means a procurement for the financing, design, construction, improvement, repair, materials, maintenance and/or operation of a public works project that is not design-bid-build. Alternative project delivery methods include but are not limited to:
(a). Design-build;
(b). Construction manager at-risk.

2. "Best value" means a selection method for alternative project delivery method entities based on evaluation of stated criteria. Stated criteria are those deemed appropriate for an alternative project delivery method contract and must include price and may include some or all of the following criteria: features, functions, life -cycle costs, experience, and/or past performance.

3. "Construction manager at-risk" means a project delivery method in which the city awards separate contracts for architectural and engineering services to design a public works project, and for licensed general contractor services. The licensed general contr actor provides construction management services for the project throughout the design, pre -construction services, and construction phases and also provides a guaranteed maximum price for construction.

4. "Design-build" means an alternative project delivery method in which the city contracts with a single entity for the design and construction of a public works project.

5.. "Guaranteed Maximum Price" means the agreed amount that the city will pay for a public works project, including, but not limited to:
(a) Specified scope of work;
(b) Cost of the trade work;
(c) General conditions;
(d) Construction contingency; and
(e) Fees charged by the construction management at -risk firm, design -build firm, or general contractor firm.

Costs exceeding the guaranteed maximum price shall be the responsibility of the general contractor.

5. "Public works" means all fixed works for the construction, alteration, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or demolition of any public improvement, including, but not limited to, constructed for public use or protection, including but not limited to, brid ges, waterworks, sewers, electric works, public buildings or facilities, street improvements, and park or open space improvements.

3.16.090. Exemption from public contract code.

A. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 1100.7, the City of Marina, as a charter city, is exempt from the provisions of the Public Contract Code, except as provided by ordinance, agreement, or where the city chooses, in its discretion, to follow portions of the Public Contract Code.

B. When public works projects or other applicable contracts are funded by state or federal sources, including but not limited to, loans or grants, the city shall comply with any contract solicitation, bidding, evaluation and award rules or regulations requir ed in order to receive such state or federal funds.

September 12, 2025 Item No. 11a

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Meeting City Council of September 16, 2025

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER OPENING A PUBLIC HEARING AND
INTRODUCING ORDINANCE 2025 -__AMENDING MARINA
MUNICIPAL CODE (MMC), TITLE 17, ARTICLE 5, SECTION

17.52.020-DEFINITIONS, TO REMOVE “MALE AND FEMALE
IMPERSONATION” FROM THE DEFINITION OF “ADULT
CABARET”. THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADOPTION IS EXEMPT

FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW P URSUANT TO SECTION
15061(b)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council consider:

1. Opening a public hearing;

2. Reading by title only Ordinance 2025-__ amending Section 17.52.020 of the Marina Municipal Code (MMC) removing the phrase “male and female impersonators” from the Definition of “Adult cabaret”; and

3. Finding t he proposed Ordinance adoption is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

BACKGROUND
At its regular public meeting held on July 1, 2025, City Council provided direction to the Community Development Department (CDD) to process a minor amendment to the Marina Municipal Code (MMC) removing the phrase “male and female impersonators” from the Definition of “Adult cabaret” as found in MMC Section 17.52.020. The Council informed staff that this type of expression has become a common art form and a cultural norm and it should be, thereby, removed from uses regulated by the Adult Businesses and Massage Therapists section of the MMC.

On August 28, 2025, the Planning Commission, at its regular noticed public hearing, adopted PC Reso. 2025-10 recommending approval of the proposed amendment to the City Council.

ANALYSIS
In California, the expression of personal identity through male and female impersonation has long been considered a n acceptable form of theat rical and cultural expression. Article 1 of the California Constitution (Sec. 2) allows freedom of expression as long as it is not indecent. In Miller v. California1, the U.S. Supreme Court found that this type of expression within a context of artistic, literary, and social expression is within the “contemporary community standards of California”.

By removing this use from the definition of “Adult cabaret” in MMC 17.52.020, male and female impersonation may legally occur at any operation or community assembly that is otherwise permitted.

1 Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973)
1 The entire MMC Chapter 17.52 entitled Adult Businesses and Massage Therapists is being reviewed for consistency with State law. A more comprehensive amendment to this Chapter will likely come before the Planning Commission and City Council in the near future.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Staff has determined that the exemption applies in this case because the proposed procedural changes would not result in a direct or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and the proposed ordinance is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have potential for causing significant effect on the environment. There fore, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from CEQA, and no further environmental review is necessary.

CONCLUSION
This request is submitted for Planning Commission consideration and recommendation to the City Council.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________
Alyson Hunter, AICP
Planning Services Manager
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

________________________
Guido Persicone, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Marina

________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE (MMC),
CHAPTER 17, ARTICLE 5, SECTION 17. 52.020 – DEFINITIONS, BY REMOVING THE PHRASE “MALE OR FEMALE IMPERSONATORS”
FROM THE DEFINITION OF “ADULT CABARET”. THE PROPOSED

ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT
TO SECTION 15061(b)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES.
-oOo-
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council of the City of Marina (City) acknowledges that male and female impersonation is now considered a respected form of comedic theatre and cultural expression. As a result, the City Council, at its July 1, 2025, meeting, requested that the Community Development Dept. (CDD) provide amendments to the Marina Municipal Code (MMC) that would remove “male and female impersonation” as a use defined in the Adult Businesses and Massage Therapists portion of the Marina Municipal Code (MMC), also known as, Section

17.52.020.

2. By removing this type of activity from this Section of the MMC and, thereby, the Adult Businesses and Massage Therapists Chapter, the City Council recognizes that this form of expression is considered simply to be artistic in nature and not subject to the other regulations found within MMC Section 17.52.

3. The proposed amendment consists of removing the phrase “male and female impersonators” from the definition of “Adult cabaret” in MMC Section 17.52.020 and is referenced herein as Exhibit A.

4. Furthermore, the Community Development Department is reviewing the entirety of MMC Section 17.52 for consistency with State law and the current goals of the City Council including inclusivity, cultural expression, and respect for everyone’s rights.

5. The proposed amendment to Chapter 17 of the MMC is consistent with Section 17.72 (Amendments).

6. At its regular noticed public hearing on August 28, 2025, the Planning Commission adopted PC Resolution 2025-10 (Exhibit B) recommending approval of the proposed amendment.
3 7. Environmental. The proposed Ordinance amendments are not subject to environmental review pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3) because the proposed procedural changes would not result in a direct or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and the proposed ordinance is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have potential for causing significant effect on the environment. Therefore, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from CEQA, and no further environmental review is necessary.

8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

9. Severability. If any portion of this Ordinance is found to be unconstitutional or invalid the City Council hereby declares that it would have enacted the remainder of this Ordinance regardless of the absence of any such invalid part.

10. Posting of Ordinance. Within fifteen (15) days after the passage of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted in the three (3) public places designated by resolution of the City Council.

The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on September 16, 2025 and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting duly held on October 7, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 Exhibit A

(Deleted text is indicated with strikethrough)

Chapter 17.52

ADULT BUSINESSES AND MASSAGE THERAPISTS
Sections:
…

17.52.020 Definitions.
…

17.52.020 Definitions.

For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply, unless the context otherwise requires:
“Adult bookstore” means an establishment in which fifty percent or more of either its floor area, inventory or monthly sales is devoted to stock, books, magazines, or other periodicals, films, videotapes, video discs, or other such electronic, magnetic, or other means of creating a moving image upon any screen, television, or other device, peep shows or other similar devices designed for use in individual viewing of films on the premises, which books, magazines, periodicals, films, videotapes, video discs, or other means, peep shows or similar devices are substantially devoted to the depiction of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas as defined herein.
“Adult businesses” means adult bookstore, adult motion picture facility, figure model studio, adult motel, adult cabaret, or massage establishment. However, a massage therapist business as defined in this section shall be excluded from the definition of adult businesses. “Adult cabaret” means an establishment which features topless -bottomless dancers, go -go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators, or similar entertainers. “Adult motels” means any establishment designated as or having the characteristics of a hotel, motel, or other transient lodging facility which has or proposes to have as a feature or service offered to its customers the presentation or entertainment in the form of motion picture film, videotape, closed circuit television, or any other similar means or device which is substantially similar thereto and provided for the purpose of displaying, showing or depicting specified anatomical areas, as defined in this section for observation or viewing by persons who are customers of such establishments. This section shall apply whether charge is made or consideration exchanged for the use of rooms within such establishments for overnight accommodations or for short-term admission to view the material above described. …

1967022.1
5 EXHIBIT B
6 EXHIBIT B
7 EXHIBIT B
8 EXHIBIT B
9 EXHIBIT B
10 September 4, 2025 Item No. 11b

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of September 16, 2025

CITY COUNCIL RECEIVING INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION AND

CONSIDER OPENING PUBLIC HEARING, TAKING ANY TESTIMONY
FROM THE PUBLIC AND CONSIDER INTRODUCING ORDINANCE NO.
2025-, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.26 OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE

REGARDING MITIGATION FEES FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN

THE CITY OF MARINA

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Receive informational presentation on a Development Impact Fee Nexus Study; and

2. Open the public hearing and take any testimony from the public, and

3. Adopt the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study; and

4. Consider introducing Ordinance No. 2025-, amending chapter 3.26 of the Marina Municipal Code regarding mitigation fees for new development within the City of Marina.

BACKGROUND:

The Mitigation Fee Act, Section 66000 et seq. of the California Government Code, and the Marina Municipal Code Chapter 3.26 Mitigation Fees for New Development, provide a mechanism whereby the City may impose and charge mitigation fees as a condition of approval for development projects. These mitigation or public facility impact fees (PFIF) may only be used to offset the cost of certain infrastructure attributable to development.

In 2007, the City contracted with Kimley Horn to conduct a Development Impact Fee Study.

Following this study, the Council adopted public facility impact fees. In 2011, and subsequently in 2016, the Development Impact Fee Study was updated and the City Council adopted updated public facility impact fees.

California Government Code Section 66016.5(c)(8) indicates that studies shall be updated at least every eight years, from the period beginning on January 1, 2022. The City recently contracted with a consulting team to provide an update to the prior impact fee studies through a new Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (Study). To comply with the Government Code and the City’s Municipal Code, the following public notifications were prepared:

• Adopted Resolution 2025-56, acknowledging the Public Hearing Notice and ratifying the setting of a Public Hearing for July 1, 2025, on the proposed intention to adopt an Impact Fee Nexus Study and to amend Chapter 3.26 of the Marina Municipal Code Regarding Mitigation Fees for New Development within the City of Marina.

• Published the notice of public hearing for July 1, 2025, on May 30, 2025, on the City’s website and with the June 3, 2025, City Council agenda packet.

1 • Placed a public notice ten days prior to the July 1, 2025, Council Meeting in the Monterey Herald newspaper on June 20, 2025, and June 26, 2025.

• Published a copy of the new Development Impact Fee Nexus Studies, prior study, and additional related information on the City’s website on June 20, 2025.

• Continued the Public Hearing at the July 1, 2025, Council Meeting; and provided notice of continuation on the City website.

• Re-published a notice of public hearing on the City website, Council Chambers Bulletin Board; Monterey County Library , Marina Branch; and the City Bulletin Board at the corner of Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard.

• Placed a public notice ten days prior to the September 16, 2025, Council Meeting in the Monterey Herald newspaper on September 4, 2025, and September 10, 2025.

• Published a copy of the revised new Development Impact Fee Nexus Studies, proposed fee schedule, and a comparative fee schedule on the City’s website on September 4, 2025: Development Impact Fees Study Update | Marina, CA - Official Website.

ANALYSIS:

The City’s new Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (Study) is divided into the following two reports and includes updates to the City’s five (5) public facilities impact fee programs:

• City of Marina Development Impact Fee Update for General Government, Public Safety, and Parks (ATTACHMENT A)
o Public building facilities
o Public safety facilities
o Parks

• City of Marina Traffic Impact Fee Update (ATTACHMENT B) o Roadways
o Intersections

The Studies re-evaluate and update the fees developed from the 2016 study; incorporate projects from the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and recommend additional projects. These fees are based on future infrastructure needs that are generated by new development. A list of recommended general government, public safety, and park improvements that were incorporated into the study are included in Attachment A, page 15; and traffic -related projects are included in Attachment B on pages 1 -2. These projects are within the City’s current General Plan boundaries; and represent a twenty-year growth and project time horizon.

In accordance with new legislation and Government 66016.5 (a)(5)(A), fees imposed on housing development projects shall be based on the square footage of the units of development. These fees were previously calculated based on the type of residential unit. To comply with this section, all fees have been converted to a square footage calculation, and when applicable on a per unit cost based on square feet. Information on the proposed new fees is included in ATTACHMENT C. An overview of this methodology and the legislation will be provided at the Council Meeting. An excerpt from the upcoming presentation which compares the City’s existing fees to the proposed new fee schedule based on typical square footage by residential unit type is included in EXHIBIT D.

2 The proposed fees are not applicable to all developments. The City has entered into Disposition and Development Agreements (DDA) which include terms related to Development Impact Fees .

The fees related to these developments will be subject to fees in accordance with such agreements. This includes the Dunes and Marina Station developments.

Government Code Section 66016.5 requires the City do all of the following when it conducts an impact fee nexus study:
• Adopt an impact fee nexus study prior to adopting new impact fees. • When applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.
• A nexus study shall include information that supports the city’s actions, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 66001.
• If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, the city shall review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fees collected under the original fee.
• A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development.

The actions requested along with the Study are intended to satisfy these requirements.

Additionally, Chapter 3.26.070 of the Marina Municipal Code requires the adoption or increase of fees by ordinance, and in accordance with Government Code Section 66016. Ordinance 2025- XX has been provided for consideration. If Council adopts the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and introduces Ordinance 2025-, the second reading adopting the ordinance will take place on October 7 , 2025. The new fees can only become effective sixty (60) days following the adoption of the ordinance.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adoption of the proposed development impact fees will provide revenue to fund the development driven projects.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council’s approval.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Tori Hannah
Finance Director
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina
3 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARINA AMENDING CHAPTER 3.26

OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING

MITIGATION FEES FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT

WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act, at Sections 66000 and following of the California Government Code, provides authority for imposing and charging mitigation fees; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 3.26 of the Municipal Code, the Community Development Director has caused to be prepared and has reviewed a revised version of the “Development Impact Fee Study” initially prepared by RBF Kimley Horn on , dated July 20, 2007 (the “Initial Study”), as updated by RBF Consulting on April 25, 2011, Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. on May 18, 2016; and further updated by Kimley Horn on September 2, 2025 and Economic and Planning Systems, Inc, (EPS) on September 3, 2025 (the “Updated Study”), incorporated herein by this reference, and on file in the office of the Public Works Division and City Clerk; and

WHEREAS, the Updated Stud y evaluates the impacts of contemplated future development on existing public facilities, public safety, transportation (roadways and intersections), and parks (collectively “Facilities”) in the City of Marina along with an analysis of the need for new Facilities and improvements required by such new development, sets forth the reasonable relationship between such needs and the impacts of the various types of development pending or anticipated for which this fee is charged and describes the estimated costs of those improvements and the continued need for those improvements; and

WHEREAS, the update to the Initial Study by Kimley Horn and EPS were necessary due to the requirements of California Government Code Section 66016.5(c)(8), changes in the City’s Capital Improvement Program , and revised cost estimates which occurred or were determined subsequent to the completion of the Initial Study; and

WHEREAS, to comply with the Government Code and the City’s Municipal Code, the following public notifications were undertaken:

• Adopted Resolution 2025-56, acknowledging the Public Hearing Notice and ratifying the setting of a Public Hearing for July 1, 2025 on the proposed intention to adopt an Impact Fee Nexus Study and to amend Chapter 3.26 of the Marina Municipal Code Regarding Mitigation Fees for New Development within the City of Marina; and

• Published the notice of public hearing for July 1, 2025 on May 30, 2025 on the City’s website and with the June 3, 2025 City Council agenda packet; and

• Placed a public notice ten days prior to the July 1, 2025 Council Meeting in the Monterey Herald newspaper on June 20, 2025 and June 26, 2025; and

• Published a copy of the new Development Impact Fee Nexus Studies, prior study, and additional related information on the City’s website on June 20, 2025; and

• Continued the Public Hearing at the July 1, 2025 Council Meeting; and provided notice of continuation on the City website; and

• Re-published a notice of public hearing on the City’s website, Council Chambers Bulletin Board, Monterey County Library Marina Branch; and the City Bulletin Board at the corner of Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard; and 4 Ordinance No. 2025-
Page Two

• Placed a public notice ten days prior to the September 16, 2025 Council Meeting in the Monterey Herald newspaper on September 4, 2025, and September 10, 2025; and

WHEREAS, a duly noticed public meeting regarding the mitigation fees recommended by the update to the Study was held before this Council pursuant to Section 3.26.070 (B)(1) of the Municipal Code and California Government Code Section 66016 on September 16 , 2025, and the Updated Study was made available to the public at least 10 days prior to the meeting; and

WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing regarding the mitigation fees recommended by the Updated Study was held before this Council pursuant to Section 3.26.070 (B)(4) of the Municipal Code and California Government Code Section 66018 on September 16, 2025.

THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:

a) Having reviewed and considered the Updated Study and the testimony and materials presented at the public hearing, this Council approves and adopts the Updated Stud y and further finds that new development in the City of Marina will generate additional population within the City and will impact the Facilities defined and analyzed in the Updated Study.

b) There is a need in the City of Marina for Facilities that have not been constructed, or have been constructed but for which new development has not contributed its fair share of facility costs, and said Facilities have been called for in or are consistent with Updated Study.

The cost estimates set forth in the Updated Study are the reasonable cost estimates in 20 24 dollars for constructing these Facilities, and the fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs.

c) The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described Facilities and the impacts of the types of developme nt described herein by Exhibit A, herein adopted and incorporated by reference as if set forth herein in their entirety , and there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development for which the fee is charged, as these reasonable relationships and nexus are in more detail described in the Updated Study.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA INCORPORATES

THE ABOVE RECITALS AND FINDINGS AS IF FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN AND DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

1. Section 3.26.050 Amended: Section 3.26.050 of Chapter 3.26, entitled

“Payment of Fees” is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

5 Ordinance No. 2025-
Page Three

“3.26.050 Payment of fees.

For new development, mitigation fees shall be charged and payable as set out in Table 1 of this chapter, as set forth in the attached one (1) page, marked Exhibit “A,” and incorporated herein by this reference thereto. The director shall determine, based on the type of development, the corresponding fee to be paid pursuant to this chapter. Except as otherwise provided by law or development agreement, the fees shall be paid at the time of issuance of any building permit for new development within the city.

2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force sixty (60) days from and after its final passage.

3. Posting of Ordinance. Within fifteen (15) days after the passage of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted in the three (3) public places designated by resolution of City Council.

4. Any fee, ordinance or resolution previously adopted in conflict with this Ordinance hereby is repealed as to any portion thereof in conflict with this Ordinance.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on 16th day of September 2025, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting duly held on the 7th day of October 2025, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

1966926.1
6 Public Public
Land Use Category per Unit Facility Safety Parks Intersections Roadways Residential
Single Family per KSF $804 $1,948 $4,661 $2,134 $6,015
Senior Homes per KSF $1,307 $3,168 $7,578 - -
Senior Homes per DU - - - $2,438 $6,873
Assisted Living per KSF $653 $1,584 $3,789 - -
Assisted Living per DU - - - $1,471 $4,146
Multifamily per KSF $1,547 $3,749 $8,971 - -
Multifamily per DU - - - $3,813 $10,748
Nonresidential
Office/Research per KSF $956 $2,318 - $6,069 $17,108
Retail/Service per KSF $574 $1,391 - $9,688 $27,309
Industrial per KSF $191 $464 - $2,783 $7,846
Hotel per Room $144 $348 - $4,473 $12,610
Church per KSF $191 $464 - $4,033 $11,370
Daycare Center per KSF $765 $1,854 - $23,883 $67,327
Animal Hospital/Clinic per KSF $1,147 $2,781 - $12,288 $34,639 Medical/Dental per KSF $1,147 $2,781 - $20,575 $58,000
(1) SF = Square Feet, KSF = 1000 Square Feet, DU = Dwelling Units, Hotel Fees are per Room. (2) Adjustments for rounding of $1 or less on total fees have been made to reflect rounding in the study.

Exhibit A
Public Facilities, Public Safety, Parks, Intersections and Roadways 7 Report
Fee Update and Nexus Study
City of Marina
Development Impact Fee Update
for General Government, Public
Safety, and Parks
Pre
pared for:

City of Marina
Pre
pared by:

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

EP
S #231081
Sep
tember 3, 2025
Attachment A
8 Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................. 4 Legal Context ............................................................................................... 5 Summary of Maximum Allowable Fees .............................................................. 7 Summary of Methodology ............................................................................... 9 Demographic and Land Use Assumptions .......................................................... 9 Facility and Vehicle Needs and Costs .............................................................. 14 Cost Allocation and Fee Calculation ................................................................ 14 Nexus Findings ........................................................................................... 19 Summary of Impact Fees ............................................................................. 21

9 List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of Maximum Allowable Fee Calculations...................................... 7 Table 2 Summary of Max Fees at Average Home Sizes (Illustrative Comparison)1 ...... 8 Table 3 Population and Employment Projections ................................................. 10 Table 4 Existing Service Population Factor Estimate ............................................ 11 Table 5 Forecasted Service Population Estimate .................................................. 12 Table 6 Average Household Size and Employment Density Assumptions ................. 13 Table 7 Marina DIF CIP for General Government, Public Safety, and Parks .............. 15 Table 8 CIP Costs Attributable to Service Population Growth ................................. 16 Table 9 CIP Cost Summary by Fee Program vs Other City Sources ........................ 17 Table 10 Facilities Costs per Resident and Employee ............................................. 18 Table 11 Development Impact Fee Calculation Overview ........................................ 19 Table 12 Summary of Maximum Per-Square-Foot Development Impact Fees ............ 22 Table 13 Single Family Fee Per Square Foot Conversion......................................... 23 Table 14 Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion ............................................ 24 Table 15 Senior Homes Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion ........................ 25 Table 16 Assisted Living Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion ....................... 26 10 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 4
Introduction and Results
Introduction
This Fee Update and Nexus Study (Nexus Study) provides the City of Marina with the necessary technical documentation to support adoption of updated development impact fees, including General Government (formerly Public Buildings), Public Safety, and Parks Fee programs. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) prepared the Nexus Study based on capital improvement planning and city growth forecasting data provided by the City of Marina. EPS conducted the analysis and reporting under a subcontract with Kimley-Horn.

General Government, Public Safety, and Parks Fee Programs may be approved by the City Council and would be effective 60 days following the City’s adoption of the fees.

A Development Impact Fee (DIF) is a one-time charge levied on new real estate development. DIFs are collected and used by local jurisdictions (e.g., a City or County) to find infrastructure and capital investments needed to serve new residential and commercial growth. Consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act (AB 1600/ Government Code Section 66000 et seq.) and related legislation, this Nexus Study provides a legal basis for three DIFs charged by the City of Marina. DIF program elements that may be established by a City Ordinance and implemented by Resolution.

The Nexus Study determines the relationship between city growth and capital improvements and provides associated fee calculations that identify the maximum fee levels the City may charge. As with current fees in Marina, updated fees would be collected on a citywide basis given the broad scope of capital improvements included in this study. While the City may elect to charge lower fees for specific land uses, areas of the city, or across the board, such reductions must be offset by alternative funding that supports the improvement program.

The fee program described in this Nexus Study is based on capital investments identified by the City that serve to maintain or increase citywide service levels. The fee program focuses on a roughly 20-year time frame and, as such, relies on forecasts for growth, development, and associated capital facilities needs over that period. To inform fee levels, the City identified specific capital facility project investments. Importantly, these capital projects may be altered or replaced over time with other qualifying projects as the City administers the fee program.

This Nexus Study and the technical information it contains should be maintained and reviewed periodically by the City to ensure ongoing relevancy and accuracy, and to enable the adequate programming of funding sources. To the extent that improvement requirements, costs, population, employment, visitors or development potential changes over time, the fee program will be updated.
11 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 5
Legal Context
The Mitigation Fee Act allows the City to adopt citywide public facilities impact fees consistent with supporting technical analysis and findings provided in this Nexus Report.

In addition, the “Mitigation Fees for New Development” section of the City’s Municipal Code allows the City Council to use the Resolution approach to set updated fees, and to periodically adjust the fees as may be necessary over time, without amending the enabling local ordinance.

Impact fee revenues are used to cover the cost of capital investments, including buildings, infrastructure improvements, and equipment required to serve new development and growth. DIFs must be based on a reasonable nexus, or connection, between new development and the need for capital investments and improvements.

Impact fee revenue cannot be used to cover the operation and maintenance costs of these or any other facilities. In addition, impact fee revenue cannot be collected or used to cover the cost of preexisting infrastructure needs or deficiencies.

In establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition for the approval of a development project, Government Code 66001(a) and 66001(b) require a local agency to:

1. Identify the purpose of the fee;

2. Identify how the fee is to be used;

3. Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the fee use and type of development project for which the fee is being used;

4. Determine how the need for the public facility relates to the type of development project for which the fee is imposed; and

5. Show the relationship between the fee and the cost of the public investments.

Furthermore, in September 2021, the State of California adopted Assembly Bill (AB) 602, which includes several new requirements related to the development and implementation of impact fee programs. The key provisions related to the calculations documented in this Nexus Report are summarized below.
• Capital Improvement Plan: AB 602 requires that jurisdictions adopt a capital improvement plan as part of the nexus study process. This adoption can occur at the same time as fee adoption. Accordingly, this Nexus Study relies on a Marina DIF Capital Improvement Plan (Marina DIF CIP) to be approved by the City Council in conjunction with the DIF Program.
1 The Marina DIF CIP presented in this Nexus

1 The Marina DIF CIP is different from and does not replace the City's 5-year CIP budget and 10-year CIP. These separate CIP documents serve a shorter period and generally rely on more specific project parameters than the DIF CIP. However, the DIF program may provide funding to support some projects included in the 5-year and 10-year CIPs. 12 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 6
Study includes the capital improvements identified by the City for General Government, Public Safety, and Parks (Table 7).
• Explanation of Level of Service and Fee Increase: AB 602 requires that when applicable, the nexus study identifies the existing level of service for each public facility, identifies the proposed new level of service, and includes an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate. This Nexus Study relies on a CIP prepared by City staff, based on City capital facilities and improvement goals for general government, public safety, and parks. Appendix A-3, identifies current and future level of service implied by the Marina DIF CIP. In general, service levels are expected to improve, with service quality increases still anticipated in cases where standard per capita service level metrics indicate a modest decrease. The Marina DIF CIP reflects the City’s goals for citywide public services provision in the areas of general government, public safety, and parks by 2045. • Capital Facilities List: The City developed a detailed list of capital facilities and equipment acquisitions planned over the next twenty years. The list includes City administrative (general government) facilities and equipment, emergency services facilities and equipment, and recreational facilities and equipment. These capital investments will serve both existing and new development. The DIF allocates a portion of the facilities and equipment costs to new development using “service population” to quantify the nexus between growth and public investments. This nexus framework is consistent with the “System Plan Method” nexus study methodology.2
• Per Square Foot Residential Fees: AB 602 notes that for fees adopted after July 1, 2022, the nexus study must “either calculate a fee levied or imposed on a housing development proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units, or make specific findings explaining why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate the fees.” AB 602 also notes that “This bill would require that a local agency that calculates fees proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development.” This analysis relies on assumptions about the unit size for residential units developed following market research and City data. Average home sizes determine the maximum per square foot fee for each residential development type.

This Nexus Study adheres to State of California statutory requirements for DIFs, as documented in subsequent chapters. Chapter 4 summarizes the specific findings that explain or demonstrate the nexus logic employed. If the DIF is adopted, this Nexus Study and the technical information it contains should be maintained and reviewed periodically by the City to ensure its accuracy and to enable adequate programming of funding

2 Impact Fee Nexus Study Templates Nexus Study and Residential Feasibility Calculation Templates in fulfillment of AB 602, December 2023, Prepared for the California Department of Housing and Community Development by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley.
13 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 7
sources. To the extent that capital improvement requirements, costs, and/or development projections change over time, the DIF levels estimated here will need to be updated. AB 602 requires the DIF to be updated at least every eight years.

Summary of Maximum Allowable Fees
Table 1 summarizes the City’s maximum allowable fee schedule for the capital facility and equipment needs as evaluated in this Fee Update. The three fee categories updated in this analysis are:
• General Government – This fee, formerly “Public Buildings,” includes the capital facilities fees for administrative and airport buildings, City vehicles, and equipment. • Public Safety – This fee includes the capital facilities fees for the Police and Fire Departments of the City.
• Parks – This fee includes capital facilities fees for the Recreation & Culture Department of the City.

Table 1 presents per-square-foot fees for residential and commercial structures. The Nexus Study also establishes per-unit maximum and minimum residential fees levels, not shown here.

Table 1 Summary of Maximum Allowable Fee Calculations

Land Use
General
Government
Public
Safety Park s Total
Residential (per sq.ft.)
Single Family $0.80 $1. 95 $4.66 $7.41
Multifamily $1.55 $3.75 $8.97 $14.27
Senior Homes $1.31 $3.17 $7.58 $12.05
Assisted Living $0.65 $1.58 $3.79 $6.03
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.) $0.96 $2.32 - $3.27
Retail (per sq. ft.) $0.57 $1.39 - $1.96
Industrial (per sq. ft.) $0.19 $0.46 - $0.65
Hotel (per sq.ft.) $0.26 $0.63 - $0.89
Church (per sq.ft.) $0.19 $0.46 - $0.65
Daycare (per sq.ft.) $0.76 $1.85 - $2.62
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.) $1.15 $2.78 - $3.93
Medical (per sq.ft.) $1.15 $2.78 - $3.93
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
14 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 8
Fees in Table 1 represent the maximum allowable per-square-foot amount that the City can charge based on the nexus requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act. The fees include a three percent (3.0%) charge to cover the cost of program administration. This Fee Update and Nexus Study is available to support City Council adoption of an updated fee schedule. Based on economic and fiscal considerations, the City of Marina may approve any impact fee level that falls below the maximum allowable.

Table 2 compares the maximum fees calculated in this Nexus Study to the existing fee schedule in the City of Marina. Per-unit fees are presented based on average size units by type, for illustrative purposes. As shown, at typical home sizes, the adoption of the maximum allowable fees would result in fee increases. Table 2 presents residential fees on a per-unit basis, for the average size dwelling unit, for comparison purposes only. The Appendix contains additional fee comparison detail, including presentation of minimum and maximum fees for each category.

Table 2 Summary of Maximum Fees at Average Home Sizes (Illustrative Comparison)1 1 Assumes single family dwelling units at 2,500 square feet; Multifamily, Senior Homes, and Assisted Living units at 1,100 square feet.

Assumes hotel rooms are 550 square feet.

Development Impact Fee Methodology
This section provides a brief overview of the nexus methodology and key assumptions used in this Study, including demographic and land use projections underlying the fee.

Chapter 3 provides more detailed calculations for each DIF category.

Current Fees (2025)
Land Use
General
Government
Public
Safety Parks Total
Excluding Roadways and
Intersections
Residential (per unit)
Single Family $2,009 $4,870 $11,653 $18,532 $16,848
Multifamily $1,701 $4,124 $9,868 $15,693 $15,599
Senior Homes $1,437 $3,484 $8,336 $13,258 $11,231
Assisted Living $719 $1,742 $4, 168 $6, 629 $6,238
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.) $956 $2,318 $3,274 $998
Retail (per sq. ft.) $574 $1,391 $1,964 $598
Industrial (per sq. ft.) $191 $464 $655 $200
Hotel (per room) $143 $348 $491 $271
Church (per sq.ft.) $191 $464 $655 $200
Daycare (per sq.ft.) $765 $1,854 $2,619 $800
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.) $1,147 $2,781 $3,929 $1,197 Medical (per sq.ft.) $1,147 $2,781 $3,929 $1,197
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
15 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 9
Summary of Methodology
The nexus methodology employed in this study is generally consistent across fee categories. As is appropriate given the range fee programs, capital facilities, and equipment covered, the study recognizes variation in the relevant service population. For each fee category, EPS applied the following general steps to calculate the nexus- supported fee amounts:

1. EPS reviewed existing and future population and employment projections defined by the City for the Study.

2. EPS reviewed new capital facility improvements and other capital investments needed to serve both existing and future residents and employees. City staff identified long- term capital investment plans for general government, public safety, and parks.

3. EPS reviewed the cost estimates prepared by City staff for specific capital investments identified in Step 2.

4. EPS allocated the capital costs identified in Step 3 between existing and new development based on nexus apportionment. Because the CIP will serve both existing and the future populations similarly, the share of costs attributable to new development is based on the new service population (attributable to growth) relative to the total citywide service population at the end of the fee program time horizon.

5. EPS distributed costs attributable to growth to residential and commercial uses to arrive at a cost per resident and a cost per employee. The distribution reflects the service population forecast for residents versus employees, recognizing that residents and employees place different demands on City services.

6. EPS relied on estimates of household size for each residential land use category to derive a fee per unit. Commercial land use fees were determined using typical employment density factors.

7. EPS converted the residential fee to a per-square-foot fee based on average housing unit sizes and then used typical maximum and minimum home sizes to establish maximum and minimum fee levels for residential uses.

Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
This section describes the demographic and land use assumptions used in this Study:
• Existing population and employment establish a basis from which growth forecasts and service levels for specific capital improvement categories are measured.
• Future population and employment growth inform capital improvement needs and the apportionment of these costs between existing and new development. 16 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 10
• Estimates of population and employment density (e.g., persons per household) inform the allocation of costs between land use categories.

Population and Employment Growth Projections
The Nexus Study relies on estimated population and employment growth to the year 2045. The growth projections reflect City development capacity and development trends rather than specific real estate development projects “in the pipeline” at the local level.

As summarized in Table 3, the projection indicates a total population of approximately 32,770 residents and total employment of approximately 9,478 by 2045. This equates to an increase of 10,434 residents and 3,318 employees, representing a 46.7 percent and

53.9 percent increase over existing conditions, respectively.

Table 3 Population and Employment Projections

Service Population Calculations
The DIF Study requires calculations that translate population and employment projections into estimates of existing and future service population. The service population is derived from assumptions that compare residents and employees based on relative service demands. The City’s population and employment, presented in Table 3, are the basis of the service population calculations described below.

Service population can differ by municipal service category. The service population for Parks excludes local employees, a key difference associated with the Parks fee calculation. For General Government and Public Safety fee programs, service population is based on the City’s existing “daytime population,” derived using the City’s existing residents, employees, and commute patterns for each to estimate the relative time spent within the City. This approach establishes an employee to resident equivalency factor to allocate costs between existing and new growth and between residential and commercial development. This Nexus Study calculates a citywide service population in 2024 estimated at 24,795, as shown in Table 4. The service population is composed of 22,336 Amount % Change
Resident Population 22,336 32,770 10,434 46.7%
Households 7,813 11,426 3,613 46.2%
Employment 6,160 9,478 3,318 53.9%
Sources: City of Marina; Kimley-Horn; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Item
2024 2045 Growth
17 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 11
residents and 6,160 employees, with each employee equivalent to 0.399 residents (i.e., the typical service demand of an employee is about 40 percent of a resident).

Table 4 Existing Service Population Factor Estimate

The General Government and Public Safety service population is projected to reach 36,553, with new growth accounting for about 32.2 percent of the service population in 2045, as shown in Table 5. The Parks service population, which is limited to residents, accounts for 31.8 percent of total service population in 2045. For the General Government and Public Safety service population, service population growth is largely attributable to residential expansion, with 88.7 percent of the service population increase # %
Marina Residents
Employment Status1 Formula a b = a * b
Not in Labor Force 10,359 46.4% 100% 46.4%
Employed in the City 994 4.5% 67% 3.0%
Employed Outside of the City 10,982 49.2% 67% 33.0%
Total Residents 22,336 100.0% 82.4%
Marina Employees
Place of Residence1 Formula b c = a * b
Live in the City 1,081 9.0% 33% 3.0%
Live Outside the City 5,079 91.0% 33% 29.9%
Total Jobs 6,160 100.0% 32.9%
Employee to Resident Equivalency Factor3 39.9%
Service Population
Calculation Count Weight Service Population Distribution Residents 22,336 100.0% 22,336 90%
Employees 6,160 39.9% 2,459 10%
Total Service Population 24,795 100%
(3) Equals weighted average of residents divided by weighted average of employees.

Sources: LEHD OnTheMap; JobsEQ; CA DOF; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (2) Assumptions regarding relative demand for City Services by resident type and employees. (1) Distribution based on data from U.S. Census (OnTheMap 2022) and Census ACS.

Item
Existing
Weight2 Weighted Average
18 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 12
attributable to residential uses and 11.3 percent attributable to employment. These proportions are used to allocate costs for General Government and Public Safety facilities and equipment included in the DIF. For Parks, cost attributable to growth is allocated entirely to residential uses since employees are not included in the parks service population.

Table 5 Forecasted Service Population Estimate

Population and Employment Density Assumptions
The Nexus Study uses population and employment density assumptions by land use type.

DIF cost estimates per capita or per job are converted to fee rates per unit or square foot based on average persons per household or square footage per employee density factors.

For residential fees, EPS first calculated all residential fees on a per unit basis (i.e., per single family and multi-family) and then converts the fee to a per-square-foot level based on typical housing unit sizes. Additional residential uses evaluated include Senior Homes and Assisted Living, which the Study assumes have equivalent size characteristics to Service Population
Calculation
Unweighted
Count Weight
General
Government &
Pu
blic Safety
Service
Population Distribution
Parks Service
Population Distribution
2024 Service Population
Residents 22,336 100.0% 22,336 90.1% 22,336 100.0%
Employees 6,160 39.9% 2,459 9.9% 0 0.0%
Total Service Population 24,795 100.0% 22,336 100.0%
2045 Service Population
Residents 32,770 100.0% 32,770 89.7% 32,770 100.0%
Employees 9,478 39.9% 3,783 10.3% 0 0.0%
Total Service Population 36,553 100.0% 32,770 100.0%
Growth in Service Population 2024-2045
Residents 10,434 10,434 88.7% 10,434 100.0%
Employees 3,318 1,324 11.3% 0 0.0%
Total Service Population 11,758 100% 10,434 100%
Growth Allocation Factors1

32.2% 31.8%
(1) Growth allocation reflects future growth in service population as a percentage of total service population in 2045.

Sources: LEHD OnTheMap; JobsEQ; CA DOF; City of Marina; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 19 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 13
typical multifamily units. Table 6 summarizes key assumptions, derived from U.S.

Census Bureau, CoStar Group, and City of Marina data, as well as EPS professional judgement.

Table 6 Average Household Size and Employment Density Assumptions

Fee Calculation
This Chapter describes the technical methodology for the DIFs. Fees will cover a variety of public buildings and vehicles, including those for needed for Police, Fire, Parks, and other City department functions. It is assumed that both residential and nonresidential development will pay both the General Government and Public Safety fees, while the Parks fee will only be paid by residential uses.

Land Use Fee Categories
Average Unit Size
Single Family 2,500 square feet
Multifamily 1,100 square feet
Residential1
Single Family 2.80 people per household
Senior Homes 2.00 people per household
Multifamily 2.37 people per household
Assisted Living 1.00 people per household
Nonresidential2
Office 300 square feet per employee
Retail 500 square feet per employee
Industrial 1,500 square feet per employee
Hotel 2 rooms per employee
Church 1,500 square feet per employee
Daycare 375 square feet per employee
Animal Hospital/ Clinic 250 square feet per employee
Medical 250 square feet per employee
Assumptions for Population & Employment
(1) Average single family and multifamily household size per occupied housing unit in the City of Marina based on data from the 2023 American Community Survey (5-Year Estimates), U.S. Census Bureau.
(2) Average employment density derived from previous City of Marina studies. Lodging assumes 0.5 employees per 550-square-foot per room (i.e., 2 rooms per employee).

Sources: U.S. Census ACS 2023 5-Year Estimates; City of Marina; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
20 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 14
Facility and Vehicle Needs and Cos ts
DIFs are derived from specific capital improvement projects and associated costs that are needed to maintain or grow City service levels, in part to accommodate new growth. The Nexus Study identifies capital improvements included in the fee program and associated cost estimates, as shown in Table 7. City staff provided the capital improvement program list and costs, drawing on internal City facilities planning and consultations with architects and facilities planners. To ensure that capital project costs included in the impact fees do not address existing deficiencies, only an appropriate portion of total costs is ultimately allocated to future growth and included in the fee program.

Cost Allocation and Fee Calculation
General Government, Public Safety, and Parks improvements are allocated to new development based on the proportion of 2045 service population attributable to new development. That is, the portion of the CIP cost allocated to the fees is based on service population growth in the City as a percentage of the City’s future 2045 service population. As shown in Table 8, this translates to 31 percent of DIF CIP costs being allocated to new development, overall. The “growth allocation factor” for vehicles, which is lower than for building and facilities, reflects that new growth occurs over time as vehicle replacement costs are incurred (See Appendix Table A-2 for vehicle cost allocation calculations).
21 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 15
Table 7 Marina DIF CIP for General Government, Public Safety, and Parks

Capital Improvement Item Description Co st Estimate
General Government
City Hall 17,500 Square Feet $14,100,000
Council Chambers 2,500 Square Feet $2,000,000
Airport Facilities T-Hangars and Box Hangars $10,000,000 Corporation Yard Expansion Additional Capacity $4,000,000 General Government Vehicles 8 Vehicles $1,500,000
General Government Equipment Miscellanious $695,000
Subtotal $32,295,000
Police Department
Police Department Buildings 15,000 Square Feet (13,000 + 2,000) $12,750,000 Police Department Vehicles 34 Vehicles $13,000,000
Subtotal $25,750,000
Fire Department
Fire Department Headquarters 20,200 Square Feet (12,400 + 7,800) $17,170,000 Fire 3 Bay Substation 7,300 Square Feet (3,300+4,000) $6,205,000 EOC/Classroom 3,500 Square Feet $2,975,000
Fire Department Vehicles 16 Vehicles $21,000,000
Subtotal $47,350,000
Recreation & Culture Department
Sports & Aquatic Center 74,000 Square Feet $45,000,000
Senior Center 14,000 Square Feet $9,100,000
Army Chapel 3800 Square Feet $2,470,000
Youth /Community Center 5000 Square Feet $3,250,000
Teen Center Expansion 2000 Square Feet $1,300,000
Preston Park Ballfield Expansion 9.3 Acres $10,550,000
Equestrian Center Redevelopment 30.5 Acres $10,000,000
Dunes Park 17 Acres $22,600,000
Glorya Jean Tate Park 4.2 Acres $8,000,000
Equestrian Boarding Facility 3 Acres $1,000,000
Disc Golf Course & Parking 1 Acre $100,000
Locke Paddon Park $2,000,000
Trail System Around City/FORTAG Trail $10,000,000
Lake Court Beach Access Trail $2,000,000
Lake Drive Park and Recreation Facility $2,000,000
Arts Village Renovation and Access $10,000,000
Vince DiMaggio/Locke Paddon Bridge $4,000,000
Culture and Recreation Department Vehicles 9 Vehicles $1,400,000 Subtotal $144,770,000
Total $250,165,000
22 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 16
Table 8 CIP Costs Attributable to Service Population Growth

Capital Improvement Item

DIF CIP
Net Cost
Est
imate1
Cost
Allocated
to G
rowth
Growth
Allocation
Fa
ctor
General Government Departments
City Hall $14,100,000 $4,535,672 32%
Council Chambers $2,000,000 $643,358 32%
Airport Facilities $10,000,000 $3,216,789 32%
Corporation Yard Expansion $4,000,000 $1,286,715 32%
General Government Vehicles $1,500,000 $309,616 21%
General Government Equipment $695,000 $223,567 32%
Fund Balance Adjustment -$6,253,071 -$2,011,481 32%
Subtotal $26,041,929 $8,204,236 32%
Public Safety
Police Department Buildings $12,750,000 $4,101,405 32%
Police Department Vehicles $13,000,000 $2,661,893 20%
Fire Department Headquarters $17,170,000 $5,523,226 32% Fire 3 Bay Substation $6,205,000 $1,996,017 32%
EOC/Classroom $2,975,000 $956,995 32%
Fire Department Vehicles $21,000,000 $5,179,030 25%
Fund Balance Adjustment -$1,649,804 -$530,707 32%
Subtotal $71,450,196 $19,887,858 28%
Recreation & Culture Department
Sports & Aquatic Center2 $44,965,000 $14,316,900 32%
Senior Center $9,100,000 $2,897, 449 32%
Army Chapel $2,470,000 $786,450 32%
Youth /Community Center $3,250,000 $1,034,803 32%
Teen Center Expansion $1,300,000 $413,921 32%
Preston Park Ballfield Expansion2 $10,500,000 $3,343,210 32% Equestrian Center Redevelopment $10,000,000 $3,184, 010 32% Dunes Park $21,100,000 $6,718,261 32%
Glorya Jean Tate Park2 $7,800,000 $2,483,528 32%
Equestrian Boarding Facility2 $1,000,000 $318,401 32%
Disc Golf Course & Parking $100,000 $31,840 32%
Loc
ke Paddon Park $2,000,000 $636,802 32%
Trail System Around City/FORTAG Trail $10,000,000 $3,184,010 32% Lake Court Beach Access Trail $2,000,000 $636,802 32%
Lake Drive Park and Recreation Facility $2,000,000 $636,802 32% Arts Village Renovation and Access $10,000,000 $3,184,010 32% Vince DiMaggio/Locke Paddon Bridge $4,000,000 $1,273,604 32% Culture and Recreation Department Vehicles $1,400,000 $310,441 22% Fund Balance Adjustment -$9,952,131 -$3,168,768 32%
Subtotal $133,032,869 $42,222,475 32%
Total $230,524,995 $70,314,569 31%
2 Reflects reduction for Fee Progrm funding allocation. 1 Net cost estimate reflects cost reductions associated with funding from Fee Program allocations to projects and remaining balances through June 30, 2024.
23 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 17
Table 9 illustrates the total costs included in the fee program for each fee category, along with costs that would be covered by other City funding sources (assuming maximum fee levels).

Table 9 CIP Cost Summary by Fee Program vs Other City Sources

Table 10 allocates costs by basic land use category, either residential or commercial, and then calculates the cost per resident and employee. These cost calculations also introduce a three percent (3.0%) administration charge for the fee programs. Table 11 utilizes the cost per resident figure to calculate fees for each department. These fee calculations result in residential impact fees that are presented on a per-unit basis.

However, AB 602 requires that residential impact fees be charged on a per-square-foot basis. As described and outlined in the summary of fees in Chapter 4, residential fees per unit have been converted into a fee per square foot based on typical housing unit sizes.

Facilities
Fee
Funded
Other City
Funding
CIP
Total
General Government $8,204,236 $17,837,694 $26,041,929
Public Safety $19,887,858 $51,562,338 $71,450,196
Recreation & Cultural Services Department $42,222,475 $90,810,394 $133,032,869 Total $70,314,569 $160,210,426 $230,524,995
24 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 18
Table 10 Facilities Costs per Resident and Employee

Cost Allocation Factor Formula
General
Government
Public
Safety
Recreation &
Culture
CIP Costs Allocated to Fee Program $8,204,236 $19, 887, 858 $42,222,475 Fee Program Administration (3%) $246,127 $596,636 $1,266,674 Total Costs Allocated to Fee Program a $8,450,363 $20,484,494 $43,489,149 Cost Allocation to Land Use1
Residential Development b 88.7% 88. 7% 100.0%
Nonresidential Development c 11.3% 11.3% 0.0%
Allocated Costs by Land Use
Residential Development d = a * b $7,498,623 $18,177,386 $43,489,149 Nonresidential Development e = a * c $951,739 $2,307,108 $0 Service Population Growth
Residents f 10,434 10,434 10,434
Employees (unweighted) g 3,318 3,318 N/A
Facilities Cost per Resident h = d / f $719 $1,742 $4,168 Facilities Cost per Employee i = e / g $287 $695 N/A
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
[1] The cost allocation to residential and nonresidential development is based on the service population attribution calculated in Table 4.
25 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 19
Table 11 D evelopment Impact Fee Calculation Overview

Nexus Findings and Impact Fee Summary
This chapter documents the necessary findings for approval of General Government, Public Safety, and Parks DIF programs for the City of Marina, as required under Government Code Section 66000 (AB1600 Mitigation Fee Act). The discussion that follows articulates the "nexus" between new development in Marina and the infrastructure improvements needed to serve that growth. Table 12 summarizes the maximum DIF levels, presented as per-square-foot fees. Tables that follow (Table 13 through Table 16) present recommended maximum and minimum per-unit fees for each residential use type.

Nexus Findings
The maximum allowable DIFs applicable to new development are calculated based on the proportionate share of demand for Marina DIF CIP investments that each land use type generates through 2045. With this context, the following findings are made regarding the Fee Program. This section addresses the following:
• Identify the purpose of the fee;
Land Use
Density
(See Table 5)
General
Government
Public
Safety Park s
Facilities Cost per Resident $719 $1,742 $4,168
Facilities Cost per Employee $287 $695 -
Residential (per unit) Persons / Household
Single Family 2.80 $2,009 $4,870 $11,653
Multifamily 2.37 $1,701 $4,124 $9,868
Senior Homes 2.00 $1,437 $3,484 $8,336
Assisted Living 1.00 $719 $1,742 $4,168
Nonresidential Average Employment Density
Office (per sq. ft.) 300 $0.96 $2.32 -
Retail (per sq. ft.) 500 $0.57 $1.39 -
Industrial (per sq. ft.) 1,500 $0.19 $0.46 -
Hotel (per sq.ft.) 1,100 $0.26 $0.63 -
Church (per sq.ft.) 1,500 $0.19 $0.46 -
Daycare (per sq.ft.) 375 $0.76 $1.85 -
Animal Hospital/ Clinic (per sq.ft.) 250 $1.15 $2.78 -
Medical (per sq.ft.) 250 $1.15 $2.78 -
Source: City of Marina and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 26 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 20
• Identify how the fee is to be used;
• Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the fee use and type of development project for which the fee is being used;
• Determine how the need for the public facility relates to the type of development project for which the fee is imposed; and
• Show the relationship between the fee and the cost of the public investments.

Purpose and Use of Fees
General Government
The fee will fund replacement of essential government facilities, including City Hall and the City Council Chambers, as well as new Airport facilities. The fee also will fund capital investments in City vehicles and equipment. The updated General Government fee covers new development’s fair share portion of the total capital investment costs identified by the City, based on service population apportionment. General Government improvement total costs and fee program costs are documented in Chapter 3.

Public Safety
The fee will fund replacement and expansion of public facilities for Fire and Police department functioning, including a police station, fire department headquarters, and a fire department substation. The fee also will fund capital investments in emergency vehicles and equipment. The updated Public Safety fee covers new development’s fair share portion of the total capital investment costs identified by the City, based on service population apportionment. The Public Safety improvement total costs and fee program costs are documented in Chapter 3.

Parks Fee
The fee will fund improvements at existing parks as well as new facilities that serve Marina residents. Parks program investments include a sports and aquatic center, a senior center, a youth center, a teen center expansion, and a range of improvements in existing parks. The fee will also fund vehicles. The updated Parks fee covers new development’s fair share portion of the total capital investment costs identified by the City, based on service population apportionment. Parks improvement total costs and fee program costs are documented in Chapter 3.

Relationship between Use of Fees and Type of Development New development in the City of Marina will require additional public facilities and capital investments to maintain or improve levels of service and meet the needs of new residents and employees. The DIF revenue will be used to fund the fair share cost of new facilities, improvements, and equipment based on current and projected City service populations. While some of the improvements included in the CIP will also benefit existing 27 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 21
land uses, the costs allocated to the DIF programs only include the proportion of cost attributable to new development.

Relationship between Need for Facility and Type of Project The infrastructure improvements identified in this study are designed to accommodate the needs of existing and future service populations. The Marina DIF CIP presented here reflects current City goals for General Government, Public Safety, and Parks facilities and equipment, as identified by City staff. Fees will apply to land uses that generate new residents and workers and thereby increase service burden on the City. The Marina DIF CIP addresses the service needs of new populations.

Relationship between Fee Amount and Cost Facilities Attributed to Development
The fee levels calculated in this Nexus Study are based on a fair share cost allocation to new service population-generating citywide development. Overall, about 31 percent of the CIP investment costs are allocated to future development, which corresponds with service population growth as a percentage of future service population. The remainder of the CIP cost is attributable to existing land uses in the city and would be funded by other sources available to the City.

Summary of Impact Fees
Table 12 summarizes the Public Buildings, Public Safety, and Parks fees for residential and nonresidential uses. The maximum fee estimates include a three percent (3.0%) program administration fee. This administration cost covers expenses for preparation of the development impact fee and subsequent updates, as well as the required reporting, auditing, collection, and other annual administrative costs involved in overseeing the program.
28 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 22
Table 12 Summary of Maximum Per-Square-Foot Development Impact Fees

AB 602 requires that residential impact fees be charged on a per square foot basis, as shown above. Table 13 through Table 16 present calculations of fee conversions into per square foot fees. EPS has also provided a recommended minimum and maximum per unit fee, based on the approximate range of typical unit sizes.

Parks General
Government
Public
Safety
Unit Size (sq.ft.)
Average1 a K|H; City; Zillow
Units equal or less than2 b EPS Assumption
Units equal or greater than3 c Redfin
Fee / Unit
Average4 $11,653 $2,009 $4,870 d
Minimum5 $4,195 $723 $1,753 e = d * (b / a)
Maximum6 $13,983 $2,411 $5,845 f = d * (c / a)
Fee Amounts
< 900 sq.ft. (per unit) $4,195 $723 $1,753 see "e"
900 - 3,000 sq.ft. (per sq. ft.) $4.66 $0.80 $1.95 = d / a > 3,000 sq.ft. (per unit) $13,983 $2,411 $5,845 see "f" 900
Item
Amount
Formula Source /
Assumption
2,500
(6) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of maximum unit size to the average unit size. 3,000
(1) Represents average square footage of recently built single family housing in Marina, based on Zillow sales data and City of Marina building permit applications.
(2) Minimum size has been adjusted to reflect the square footage for a 1-person household, based on the average unit size (2,373 sq. ft.) and average persons per household (2.80) in Marina. (3) Represents high end of home size in Marina based on Redfin sales data. (4) Based on the average development impact fee per unit as calculated in Table 10. (5) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of minimum unit size to the average unit size. 30 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 24
Table 14 Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion

Parks General
Government Public Safety
Unit Size (sq.ft.)
Average1 a Redfin
Units equal or less than2 b EPS Assumption
Units equal or greater than3 c Redfin
Fee / Unit
Average4 $9,868 $1,701 $4,124 d
Minimum5 $4,485 $773 $1,875 e = d * (b / a)
Maximum6 $14,353 $2,475 $5,999 f = d * (c / a)
Fee Amounts
< 500 sq.ft. (per unit) $4,485 $773 $1,875 see "e"
500 - 1,600 sq.ft. (per sq. ft.) $8.97 $1.55 $3.75 = d / a > 1,600 sq.ft. (per unit) $14,353 $2,475 $5,999 see "f" 500
Item
Amount
Formula Source /
Assumption
1,100
(6) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of maximum unit size to the average unit size. 1,600
(1) Represents average square footage of multifamily housing in Marina based on Redfin data. (2) Minimum size has been adjusted to reflect the square footage for a 1-person household, based on the average unit size (1,100 sq. ft.) and average persons per household (2.37) in Marina. (3) Represents high end of multifamily housing size in Marina based on Redfin data. (4) Based on the average development impact fee per unit as calculated in Table 10. (5) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of minimum unit size to the average unit size. 31 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 25
Table 15 Senior Homes Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion

Parks General
Government Public Safety
Unit Size (sq.ft.)
Average1 a Redfin
Units equal or less than2 b EPS Assumption
Units equal or greater than3 c Redfin
Fee / Unit
Average4 $8,336 $1,437 $3,484 d
Minimum5 $3,789 $653 $1,584 e = d * (b / a)
Maximum6 $12,125 $2,091 $5,068 f = d * (c / a)
Fee Amounts
< 500 sq.ft. (per unit) $3,789 $653 $1,584 see "e"
500 - 1,600 sq.ft. (per sq. ft.) $7.58 $1.31 $3.17 = d / a > 1,600 sq.ft. (per unit) $12,125 $2,091 $5,068 see "f" (6) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of maximum unit size to the average unit size. 1,600
(1) Represents average square footage of multifamily housing in Marina based on Redfin data. (2) Minimum size has been adjusted to reflect the square footage for a 1-person household, based on the average unit size (1,100 sq. ft.) and average persons per household (2.37) in Marina. (3) Represents high end of multifamily housing size in Marina based on Redfin data. (4) Based on the average development impact fee per unit as calculated in Table 10. (5) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of minimum unit size to the average unit size. 500
Item
Amount
Formula Source /
Assumption
1,100
32 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 26
Table 16 Assisted Living Multifamily Fee Per Square Foot Conversion

Parks General
Government Public Safety
Unit Size (sq.ft.)
Average1 a Redfin
Units equal or less than2 b EPS Assumption
Units equal or greater than3 c Redfin
Fee / Unit
Average4 $4,168 $719 $1,742 d
Minimum5 $1,895 $327 $792 e = d * (b / a)
Maximum6 $6,063 $1,045 $2,534 f = d * (c / a)
Fee Amounts
< 500 sq.ft. (per unit) $1,895 $327 $792 see "e"
500 - 1,600 sq.ft. (per sq. ft.) $3.79 $0.65 $1.58 = d / a > 1,600 sq.ft. (per unit) $6,063 $1,045 $2,534 see "f"
(6) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of maximum unit size to the average unit size. 1,600
(1) Represents average square footage of multifamily housing in Marina based on Redfin data. (2) Minimum size has been adjusted to reflect the square footage for a 1-person household, based on the average unit size (1,100 sq. ft.) and average persons per household (2.37) in Marina. (3) Represents high end of multifamily housing size in Marina based on Redfin data. (4) Based on the average development impact fee per unit as calculated in Table 10. (5) Adjusts the average fee based on the ratio of minimum unit size to the average unit size. 500
Item
Amount
Formula Source /
Assumption
1,100
33 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 27

Appendix

34 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 28
Appendix Table 1 Existing Facilities

Facility Address E xisting Amount
General Government (Building Sq.Ft.)
Annex Building 209 Cypress Ave. 3,420
Church Building 2801 2nd Ave. 3,816
Council Chambers 211 Hillcrest Ave. 2,304
City Hall 211 Hillcrest Ave. 6,115
Old Corp. Yard Building 3040 Lake Ct 3,800
Animal Shelter Building 3040 Lake Drive 665
Corp Yard Building 2660 Fifth Avenue 10,166
Subtotal 30,286
Vehicles 7
Fire (Building Sq.Ft.)
Fire Station 210 8th St. 15,000
Subtotal 15,000
Vehicles 14
Police (Building Sq.Ft.)
Public Safety Building 211 Hillcrest Ave. 12,474
Subtotal 12,474
Vehicles 31
Park Facilities (Acres)
Tate Park Grass/Baseball/Softball: 3255 Abdy Way 3.3
Community Center Playground 211 Hillcrest Ave. 0.3
Los Arboles Sports Complex 327 Reindollar Ave. 13.3
Preston Park 3100 Preston Dr. 9.3
Vince DiMaggio Park 3200 Del Monte Ave. 4.8
Windy Hill 3240 DeForest Rd.@ Beach Rd. 1.8
Locke-Paddon Park 190 Seaside Cir. 20.1
Glorya Jean Tate Park 3254 Abdy Way 4.2
Equestrian Center 2830 5th Avenue 30.5
Dunes Park 2nd Avenue between 6th & 8th 42.0
Hilltop Park 4th Avenue at 9th Street 12.0
Subtotal Acres 141.6
Recreation and Culture Facilities (Building/Facilitiy Sq.Ft.) Library 190 Seaside Cir. 18,600
Tate Park Scout House 3254 Abdy Way 1,440
Community Center 211 Hillcrest Ave. 6,597
Teen Center 304 Hillcrest Ave. 3,552
Snack Bar and Building 327 Reindollar Ave. 910
Preston Park Building 3100 Preston Dr. 1,668
Windy Hill Park Building 3240 DeForest Rd.@ Beach Rd. 2,483 Bathrooms 190 Seaside Cir. 300
Veterinary Clinic Building 3140 2,160
Barns 2830,2832,2834,2836,2838 Fifth Avenue 16,300
Subtotal Building/Facility Square Feet 54,010
Teen Center Skate Park 304 Hillcrest Ave. 14,875
Vehicles 5
Source: City of Marina
35 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 29
Appendix Table 2 Vehicle CIP Detail

Appendix Table 3 Level of Service Comparison

Department
Existing
Vehicles
New
Vehicles
Average Per
Vehicle Cost
Replacement
Frequency
Total
Cost1
Cost Allocated
to Growth
2024-2045
General Government Vehicles 7 1 $50,000 5 Years $1,500,000 $309,616 Police Department Vehicles 31 3 $100,000 5 Years $13,000,000 $2,661,893 Fire Department Vehicles2 14 2 $700,000 10 Years $21,000,000 $5,179,030 Recreation and Cultural
Services Department Vehicles 5 4 $50,000 5 Years $1,400,000 $310,441 Total 57 $900,000 $36,900,000 $8,460,979
[2] Based on a weighted average of fire department vehicle types, including Type 1 and 3 fire engines, trucks, utility vehicles, command vehicles, and rescue vehicles.
[1] Assumes that new vehicles are purchased at the midpoint of the devlopment timeline (i.e., no vehicle replacement is required in the intial years of the fee program)
Existing
Inventory
Existing Service
Level1
Existing + CIP for
2045
2045 Service
Level1
a b = a /
(24,934 / 1,000) c d = c *
(44,219 / 1,000)
General Government
Building Space2 30,286 1,221 41,867 1,145 square feet
Vehicle Fleet 7 0.3 8 0.2 vehicles
Police Department
Police Station2 12,474 503 15,000 410 square feet
Vehicle Fleet 31 1.3 34 0.9 vehicles
Fire Department
Fire Stations 15,000 605 31,000 848 square feet
Vehicle Fleet 14 0.6 16 0.4 vehicles
Recreation and Culture
Parkland 141.6 5.7 206.6 5.7 acres
Recreation Buildings 54,010 2,178 152,810 4,181 square feet Teen Center Skate Park 14,875 600 14,875 407 square feet Vehicle Fleet 5 0.2 9 0.2 vehicles
(1) Calculations reflect existing and future City facilities and equipment per 1,000 service population. (2) See Appendix Table A-1 table for detailed list of exiting facilities included.

Item Units
36 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 30
Appendix Table 4 General Government Fee Comparison

Appendix Table 5 Public Safety Fee Comparison

2025
Current Fee
Per-Square-
Foot Fee
Per-Unit
Minimum Fee
Per-Unit
Maximum Fee
Residential (per sq.ft.)
Single Family $4,983 $0. 80 $723 $2,411
Multifamily $4,615 $1.55 $773 $2,475
Senior Homes $3,323 $1.31 $653 $2,091
Assisted Living $1,845 $0.65 $327 $1,045
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.) $0.35 $0.96
Retail (per sq. ft.) $0.21 $0.57
Industrial (per sq. ft.) $0.07 $0.19
Hotel (per sq.ft.) $0.09 $0.26
Church (per sq.ft.) $0.07 $0.19
Daycare (per sq.ft.) $0.28 $0.76
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.) $0.42 $1.15
Medical (per sq.ft.) $0.42 $1.15
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Updated Maximum Allowable Fees
2025
Current Fee
Per-Square-
Foot Fee
Per-Unit
Minimum Fee
Per-Unit
Maximum Fee
Residential (per sq.ft.)
Single Family $1,074 $1. 95 $1,753 $5,845
Multifamily $993 $3.75 $1,875 $5,999
Senior Homes $714 $3.17 $1,584 $5,068
Assisted Living $397 $1.58 $792 $2,534
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.) $0.65 $2.32
Retail (per sq. ft.) $0.39 $1.39
Industrial (per sq. ft.) $0.13 $0.46
Hotel (per sq.ft.) $0.18 $0.63
Church (per sq.ft.) $0.13 $0.46
Daycare (per sq.ft.) $0.52 $1.85
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.) $0.78 $2.78
Medical (per sq.ft.) $0.78 $2.78
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Updated Maximum Allowable Fees
37 Marina Development Impact Fee Nexus Study September 3, 2025 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 31
Appendix Table 6 Parks Fee Comparison

Appendix Table 7 Combined Fee Comparison

2025
Current Fee
Per-Square-
Foot Fee
Per-Unit
Minimum Fee
Per-Unit
Maximum Fee
Residential (per sq.ft.)
Single Family $10,791 $4. 66 $4,195 $13,983
Multifamily $9,991 $8.97 $4,485 $14,353
Senior Homes $7,194 $7.58 $3,789 $12,125
Assisted Living $3,996 $3.79 $1,895 $6,063
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.)
Retail (per sq. ft.)
Industrial (per sq. ft.)
Hotel (per sq.ft.)
Church (per sq.ft.)
Daycare (per sq.ft.)
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.)
Medical (per sq.ft.)
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Updated Maximum Allowable Fees
2025
Current Fee
Per-Square-
Foot Fee
Per-Unit
Minimum Fee
Per-Unit
Maximum Fee
Residential (per sq.ft.)
Single Family $16,848 $7. 41 $6,672 $22,239
Multifamily $15,599 $14.27 $7,133 $22,827
Senior Homes $11,231 $12.05 $6,026 $19,284
Assisted Living $6,238 $6.03 $3,013 $9,642
Nonresidential
Office (per sq. ft.) $1.00 $3.27
Retail (per sq. ft.) $0.60 $1.96
Industrial (per sq. ft.) $0.20 $0.65
Hotel (per sq.ft.) $0.27 $0.89
Church (per sq.ft.) $0.20 $0.65
Daycare (per sq.ft.) $0.80 $2.62
Animal Hospital (per sq.ft.) $1.20 $3.93
Medical (per sq.ft.) $1.20 $3.93
Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Updated Maximum Allowable Fees
38 City of Marina
Traffic Impact Fee
Update
Report
Prepared for:

City of Marina
September 2, 2025
Attachment B
39 Table of Contents
Programmed CIP Transportation Projects ............................................................................... 1 Growth Projections .................................................................................................................... 4 Land Use Growth Projections ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Land Use Trip Generation.............................................................................................................................................................. 5 AB 602 Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 7 Level of Service Analysis Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Level of Service Results .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Housing Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................................14 Nexus Allocation and Fee Calculations ..................................................................................19 Allocation to Users ........................................................................................................................................................................19 Fee Calculations .............................................................................................................................................................................21 Required Program Elements ...................................................................................................23 Appendices ..............................................................................................................................24 Appendix A: Level of Service Analysis Outputs .......................................................................................................................24 40 List of Figures
Figure 1 – Marina TIF Program Projects ............................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Tables
Table 1 – Proposed City of Marina TIF Projects – Intersections and Roadways ....................................................................... 1 Table 2 – New Development Impact Fee Area Land Use Projections ......................................................................................... 5 Table 3 – Citywide Growth Projections .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Table 4 – Trip Demand Factors............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Table 5 – Land Use Growth Converted to Adjusted Daily Trips .................................................................................................... 6 Table 6 – Methodology and Measure of Effectiveness .................................................................................................................. 7 Table 7 – Methodology and Measure of Effectiveness .................................................................................................................. 8 Table 8 – Intersection Level of Service Summary ......................................................................................................................... 10 Table 9 – Roadway Capacity Level of Service Summary .............................................................................................................. 12 Table 10 – Pedestrian Level of Comfort Summary ....................................................................................................................... 13 Table 11 – Bicycle Level of Stress Summary ................................................................................................................................... 14 Table 12 – City of Marina Trip Generation Data – Replica 2023 ............................................................................................... 15 Table 13 – No. of Single-Family Unit Detached Structures by AHS Square Foot Category.................................................. 16 Table 14 – Daily Vehicle Trips for All Households in Each AHS Square Foot Category ......................................................... 17 Table 15 – Single-Family Units Built in City of Marina’s Surrounding Region ......................................................................... 17 Table 16 – Estimated EDUs for Single-Family Units by Square Foot Groupings..................................................................... 18 Table 17 – Project Costs Eligible for TIF .......................................................................................................................................... 20 Table 18 – Calculation of Fee per Adjusted Daily Trip ................................................................................................................. 21 Table 19 – Fee per Land Use Category ............................................................................................................................................ 21 Table 20 – Fee for Single Family Residential Land Use by Size .................................................................................................. 22 41 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
1 | Page
Programmed CIP Transportation Projects
For this TIF Program update, the project team worked closely with City staff to conduct a comprehensive review of the transportation projects to be included in the program. This review identified 26 projects focused on intersection and roadway improvements, which have been included in this study. The area covere d by the TIF P ro gram a nd the locatio n of p roje cts pro posed for in clusion i n the fee prog ram ar e shown in Figure 1.

Cost estimates for each project were provided by the City Staff which were updated to 2024 dollars where applicable. The project list including the 2024 dollars cost estimates is shown inTable 1.

Table 1 – Proposed City of Marina TIF Projects – Intersections and Roadways ID Project Name Description1
Estimated
Cost
(2024 dollars)
Intersection Improvement Projects
1 2nd Avenue & Inter-Garrison
Road
Construct a second left turn lane for the eastbound
approach, additional through lane for westbound
approach and right-turn pocket at southbound
approach at the intersection of 2nd Avenue and
Inter-Garrison Road.
$875,200
2 Imjin Road & 8th Street Implement modern roundabout at the intersection of Imjin Road and 8th Street. $1,800,000
3 California Drive & 8th Street Implement modern roundabout at the intersection of California Drive and 8th Street. $1,750,300
4 Reservation Road & Salinas
Avenue
Signalize intersection of Reservation Road and
Salinas Avenue. $2,438,600
5 Imjin Parkway bridge @ SR 12 Restripe lanes to accommodate two WB lanes on the Imjin Parkway bridge over SR 1. $41,400
6 SR 1 Southbound off-ramp @
Imjin Parkway2
Convert the southbound off-ramp to a loop
configuration at SR 1 and Imjin Parkway
interchange.
$3,182,400
7 SR 1 Southbound on-ramp @
Imjin Parkway2
Widen the southbound on-ramp at SR 1 and Imjin
Parkway interchange to accommodate two lanes. $795,600
8 Del Monte Boulevard & Beach
Road
Widen the existing roundabout at the intersection
of Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road to 2-lanes. -
9 Imjin Parkway & 2nd Avenue
Construct a second eastbound right turn lane and
dedicated westbound right-turn lane at the
intersection of Imjin Parkway and 2nd Avenue.
$6,583,200
10 Reservation Road & Del Monte
Boulevard
Construct a multi lane roundabout at the
intersection of Reservation Road & Del Monte
Boulevard.
$2,800,000
11 California Avenue & Marina
Heights Drive
Signalize intersection of California Avenue and
Marina Heights Drive. $1,384,400
12 SR1 Southbound Ramp @
Reservation Rd
Signalize intersection of SR1 Southbound Ramp and
Reservation Road. $4,000,000
42 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
2 | Page
Table 1 – Proposed City of Marina TIF Projects – Intersections and Roadways ID Project Name Description1
Estimated
Cost
(2024 dollars)
13 SR1 Northbound Ramp @
Reservation Road
Signalize intersection of SR1 Northbound Ramp and
Reservation Road. $4,000,000
14 Cardoza Avenue & Reservation
Road
Construct westbound right turn only lane from
Cardoza Avenue to SR1 Northbound Ramp. $3,500,000
15 Del Monte Boulevard and
Patton Parkway Roundabout
Construct a new Roundabout intersection at Del
Monte Boulevard and Patton Parkway $6,000,000
Roadway Improvement Projects
16 Del Monte Boulevard
Extension3
Construct new 2-lane collector between Imjin
Parkway and Reindollar Avenue. $17,000,000
17 8th Street from California
Avenue to Inter-Garrison
Road3
Reconstruct 8th Street into 2-lane arterial with a
two-way-left-turn lane between California Avenue
and Inter-Garrison Road.
$9,449,700
18 Salinas Avenue - Reservation
Road to Carmel Avenue3
Reconstruct Salinas Avenue into a 2-lane collector
between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue. $3,450,000
19 Imjin Parkway & SR1
Interchange
Reconstruct interchange between Imjin Parkway
and SR1. $24,385,300
20 Del Monte Boulevard - Beach
Road to Marina Greens Drive
Widen Del Monte Boulevard to a 4-lane arterial
between Beach Road and Marina Greens Drive. $13,411,900 21 Del Monte Boulevard & SR 1
Interchange
Reconstruct interchange between Del Monte
Boulevard and SR1. -
22 Reservation Road – Beach
Road to SR 1
Widen Reservation Road to a 4-lane divided arterial
with a two-way-left-turn lane between Beach Road
and SR1 Southbound Ramp.
$6,099,250
23 Reservation Road - Imjin Road
to Blanco Road
Widen Reservation Road to a 6-lane expressway
between Imjin Road and Blanco Road. $13,036,400
24 Airport Access Road
Construct new access road from University Drive
and UC Mbest Drive intersection to the existing
access road connecting to Ramco Enterprises
building providing additional connection to the
Marina Municipal Airport.
$6,190,000
25 Reservation Road – Del Monte
Boulevard to California Street
Improve Reservation Corridor from Del Monte
Boulevard to California Street with six roundabout
intersections, install separated bike facilities and
install new sidewalks.
$31,174,100
26 Del Monte Corridor –
Reindollar Avenue to
Reservation Road
Improve Del Monte Corridor with two roundabout
intersections at Reindollar Avenue and Palm
Avenue, install separated bike facilities and
sidewalks.
$16,258,700
Total $179,606,450
Notes:
1: Project 1 through 20 are intersection improvement projects and Project 21 through 29 are roadway improvement projects. 2: Projects 5, 6, & 7 are considered as intersection projects and analyzed as one combined intersection improvement 3: Projects 8 and 21 are part of the DIF program but are not considered eligible for the current fee program as they are given a lower priority based on traffic growth and may be required beyond 2045 conditions. 43 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
3 | Page
Figure 1 – Marina TIF Program Projects
44 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
4 | Page
Growth Projections
This chapter details the population and employment growth projections used for the TIF update. Note that these are consistent with those based on the population and employment projections from the City’s most recent General Plan and Housing Element Update. Projections by land use category and trip generation by land use are discussed below.

Land Use Growth Projections
The growth projections for the approved and pending developments were determined in coordination with the City and incorporated into the Association of Monterey Bay Governments’ travel demand model (AMBAG TDM) used for this study. The AMBAG TDM utilizes a base year of 2015 and a future year of 2045, representing the conditions expected when the City’s General Plan and Housing Element are fully built out.

As part of this study, the model’s base year was revised to reflect 2024 conditions. The growth projections were converted into population, households and employment as input to the model.

The proposed land uses were distributed throughout the Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) that represent the proposed growth in the City and were added to the base year household and employment numbers to represent the future build out scenario. In order to estimate the number of employees for the non- residential land uses to input into the model, the ratio of daily trip generation rates listed in the Trip Generation Handbook, 11th Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) between 1,000 square-feet and employees was used. The number of daily trips produced by the size of each of the land use codes for office, retail and industrial was used to back calculate the number of employees based on each land use’s equation for the number of trips that are produced by each employee.

While the AMBAG TDM uses household as its input, there is no differentiation between single-family and multi-family residential in terms of trip generation and distribution. However, the AMBAG TDM is a hybrid model as its processes follow the traditional four-step model (trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and trip assignment), but it also contains a population synthesis step based on socioeconomic data collected throughout the AMBAG region to produce individuals living in each household that contain their own trip making characteristics. Therefore, the population synthesis step was completed to develop the population estimates for the future growth in the City. The land use estimates for future growth are summarized in Table 2. The population, household and employment estimates for the base year and future year are summarized in Table 3. It is estimated that the growth in the impact fee area will increase the City population by approximately 10,434 people and will generate about 3,318 new jobs. 45 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
5 | Page
Table 2 – New Development Impact Fee Area Land Use Projections Projects
Single
Family
(DU)
Multi
Family
(DU)
Office
(KSF)
Retail
(KSF)
Industrial
(KSF)
Hotel
(Rooms)
UCMBEST - - 266 34 88 150
Downtown Specific Plan - 1,000 128 219 0 -
Dunes 683 - 0 35 0 300
Marina Station 709 651 144 60 652 -
Sea Haven 476 - 0 0 0 -
3298 Del Monte - 94 0 0 0 -
Total 1,868 1,745 537 348 740 450
Table 3 – Citywide Growth Projections
Growth Category 2024 Base Year
for AMBAG Model
2045 Horizon Year
for AMBAG Model
2024 to 2045
Growth
Population 22,336 32,770 10.434 (47%)
Households 7,813 11,426 3.613 (46%)
Employment/Jobs 6,160 9,478 3,318 (54%)
Land Use Trip Generation
To assess the TIF across various land uses a Trip Demand Factor (TDF) is calculated, which reflects the trip g e n e r a t i o n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f e a c h l a n d u s e t h a t p r o d u c e s n e w v e h i c l e t r i p s o n t h e r o a d w a y s y s t e m i n Marina. Each land use has unique trip generation characteristics including base trip generation rate, pass- b y t r i p r a t e s a n d t i m e - o f - d a y v a r i a t i o n t h a t a r e u s e d a s i n p u t s i n c a l c u l a t i n g t h e T D F . T h e d a i l y t r i p generation rates have been obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition as shown in Table 4.

TDFs are calculated by multiplying the daily trip rate by the new trip percentage for each land use. The new trip percentage for each land use was obtained from SANDAG’s Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates and accounts for the fact that some trips generated by the land uses will be pass-by or otherwise pre- existing trips. As these trips are already on the City’s roadway network, they cannot be included as part of the growth used to calculate the fees for the 2024 TIF Program. 46 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
6 | Page
Table 4 – Trip Demand Factors
Fee Category
(Development Type) Unit ITE Lane
Use Code
Daily Trip
Rate1
New Trip
Percentage2
Trip Demand
Factor
Residential
Single Family Unit 210 9.43 97% 9.15
Multifamily Unit 220 6.74 97% 6.54
Nonresidential
Office KSF 710 10.84 96% 10.41
Retail KSF 820 37.01 70% 16.61
Industrial KSF 110 4.87 98% 4.77
Hotel Room 310 7.99 96% 7.67

1. Reflects average number of daily trips for the unit type indicated based on data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition).

2. This factor accounts for the fact that some trips generated by the land uses will be pass-by or otherwise pre-existing trips.

Source is Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates, SANDAG, April 2002.

The adjusted TDFs are used to calculate the total growth in adjusted daily trips generated by each land use type. The growth projected to occur in the City of Marina was taken from the City’s General P lan and Housing Element and in consultation with the City, as outlined inTable 5. As shown inTable 5, the land use growth was multiplied by its respective adjusted trip rate to calculate the total daily trip generation growth in the City. These calculations resulted in an estimated adjusted daily citywide trip increase of 46,851 between 2024 and 2045.

Table 5 – Land Use Growth Converted to Adjusted Daily Trips Land Use Type Unit Quantity Adjusted
Daily TDF
Adjusted
Daily Trips
Single Family DU 1,868 9.15 17,087
Multifamily DU 1,000 6.54 11,408
Office KSF 357.3 10.41 5,592
Retail KSF 348.0 16.61 5,781
Industrial KSF 740.0 4.77 3,532
Hotel Rooms 450 7.67 3,452
Total 46,851
47 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
7 | Page
AB 602 Analysis
Assembly Bill (AB) 602 was approved on September 28, 2021, and went into effect on January 1, 2022. This legislation requires that impact fee nexus studies adopted on or after January 1, 2022, must, as appropriate, identify the existing level of service for each public facility, specify the new level of service once an improvement (project) is constructed, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is necessary. It is important to note that AB 602 does not specifically define the basis for the required level of service analyses. Consequently, the methods used to assess the level of service for various public facilities must be tailored to the type of facility being analyzed and the information available.

AB 602 also mandates that studies adopted after July 1, 2022, must calculate fees levied or imposed on housing development projects proportionate to the square footage of the proposed units, or provide specific findings explaining why square footage is not an appropriate metric for fee calculation. In essence, development impact fees must be stratified based on the size of the housing unit or be supported by findings justifying the decision not to stratify the fees. As part of this study, an AB 602 deficiency analysis and fee stratification analysis were conducted.

T h e A B 6 0 2 a n a l y s i s e v a l u a t e d 2 4 o f 2 6 p r o j e c t s , s u m m a r i z e d i nT a b l e 1 earlier, which involved improvements to public facilities. The projects identified for the required level of service (LOS) analysis under AB 602 were categorized as either an intersection or roadway improvement. Projects 1 through 15 were analyzed as intersection LOS improvements, Project 16 through 24 were analyzed as roadway LOS improvements and Projects 25 and 26 were analyzed as roadway safety improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Level of Service Analysis Methodology
Table 6 summarizes the methodology and MOE that was used to determine existing and future conditions depending on the type of improvement.

Table 6 – Methodology and Measure of Effectiveness
Improvement Type Methodology Measure of Effectiveness
Intersection HCM LOS (Delay)
Roadway Capacity Roadway Volume LOS Threshold LOS (V/C) Roadway Ped/Bike Roadway LTS Threshold LOS (LTS)
Note: HCM = Highway Capacity Manual, LOS = Level of Service, Volume-to-Capacity Ratio, LTS=Level of Traffic Street The intersection LOS analysis for AB 602 was conducted for the PM peak-hour which represents the worst traffic conditions, and roadway LOS analysis was conducted for the daily traffic.

Intersection Level of Service
Analysis of intersection level of service (LOS) is based on the Highway Capacity Manual’s (HCM) concept of LOS. The HCM defines the LOS of a facility as a qualitative measure used to describe operational conditions.

LOS rang es f rom A (f ree flow tra ffic with m inim al d el ay) to F (he avy con ge stion ope ratin g ne ar or ove r 48 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
8 | Page
capacity). LOS was determined using methodologies defined in HCM 7th Edition, the current edition at the time of the analysis. The LOS criteria is summarized in Table 7.

Existing condition traffic counts during the AM (7 AM – 9 AM) and PM (4 PM – 6 PM) peak period were collected in September 2023. Future 2045 No Build and 2045 Build volumes were developed by adding travel demand model growth to existing counts. The travel demand model maintained by Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG model) was used to determine future traffic growth.

Table 7 – Methodology and Measure of Effectiveness
Level of Service
(LOS)
Signalized
Delay (sec/veh)
Unsignalized
Delay (sec/veh)
A ≤ 10 ≤ 10
B > 10.0 – 20.0 > 10.0 – 15.0
C > 20.0 – 35.0 > 15.0 – 25.0
D > 35.0 – 55.0 > 25.0 – 35.0
E > 55.0 – 80.0 > 35.0 – 50.0
F > 80.0 > 50.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition
Note: For All-way stop-control intersection (AWSC), LOS is defined based on average intersection delay.

For two-way stop-controlled intersections (TWSC), LOS is defined based on the worst movement delay.

According to the City of Marina General Plan, the City aims to maintain LOS D or better as the standard at all interse ctions. Th ere fore, fo r this a nalysis int ers ecti ons c alculat ed to op erat e at LOS E or LOS F were determined to be deficient.

Roadway Capacity
Roadway improvements were evaluated based on threshold average daily traffic volumes (ADT) for various facility types. The daily volume thresholds are based on the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 and intended for preliminary planning purposes only. Existing condition volumes for the study roadway segments were collected from the Replica Big Data platform. Replica provides travel data by mode as well as by roadway segments. Future 2045 No Build and 2045 Build volumes were developed by adding model growth to existing volumes. Note that while the City aims to maintain an LOS D or better on its roadways, for the purposes of this analysis a deficient roadway is one that operates at LOS E or LOS F.

Roadway Pedestrian and Bicycle
Roadway pedestrian and Bicycle improvements analysis utilized pedestrian level of comfort (LOC) and Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) methodology. Both of these methodologies quantify amount of discomfort pedestrian or bicyclist may experience when traveling close to vehicle traffic. The LOC or LTS methodology assigns a numerical ranking between 1-4, where 1 is very comfortable and 4 is undesirable, based on facility attributed such as speed, number of travel lanes, pathway widths, etc. This analysis utilized 49 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
9 | Page
modified LOC and LTS methodologies from Montgomery County their methodology accounts for additional factors.

Level of Service Results
This section presents a summary of results for each project. Detailed analysis tables and outputs are included in Appendix B.

Intersection
Interse ction LOS an alysis was com plet ed for P ro je cts 1 through 20.Table 8 p res ents a sum m ary of th e intersection LOS. Note that as discussed previously, LOS is presented in terms of the PM Peak-hour.

Project 1 evaluated the 2nd Avenue and Inter-Garrison Road intersection. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing PM LOS from A to B. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 1 will improve operations to LOS A for PM.

Project 2 evaluated the Imjin Road and 8th Street intersection. This intersection operates at an LOS A in existing PM conditions. Under future conditions, the intersection operates at LOS C under PM conditions.

Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 2 will improve operations to LOS A for PM.

Project 3 evaluated the California Drive/5th Avenue and 8th Street intersection. This intersection operates at LOS A for existing and future PM conditions. Future development will slightly increase delay at this intersection. Project 3 will decrease the delay and keep operations to LOS A for PM.

Project 4 evaluated the Reservation Road and Salinas Avenue intersection. It is estimated that future development will slightly increase delay at this intersection. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 4 will improve operations to LOS A from C for PM.

Project 5, Project 6, and Project 7 evaluated all Highway 1 ramps that intersect with Imjin Parkway. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing PM LOS from C to E. Project 5, Project 6, and Project 7 will add geometric improvements to each intersection that will result in no delay.

Project 8 is not considered eligible for the TIF program due to low priority and is not evaluated for the LOS analysis.

Project 9 evaluated the Imjin Parkway and 2nd Avenue intersection. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing PM LOS from B to D. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 9 will decrease delay, but operations remain at LOS D for PM.

Project 10 evaluated the Del Monte Boulevard and Reservation Road intersection. It is estimated that future development will slightly increase delay at this intersection. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 10 will slightly decrease delay, but operations remain at LOS C for PM.

Project 11 evaluated the California Avenue and Marina Heights Drive intersection. It is estimated that future development will slightly increase delay at this intersection. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 11 will improve operations to LOS A for PM.
50 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
10 | Page
Project 12 evaluated the Reservation Road and SR1 Southbound Ramp intersection. This intersection operates at an LOS F in PM in existing and future conditions, which would be considered an existing deficiency. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 12 will improve operations to LOS C for PM.

Project 13 evaluated the Reservation Road and SR1 Northbound Ramp intersection. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing PM LOS from B to C. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 13 will improve operations to LOS B for PM.

Project 14 evaluated the Cardoza Avenue and Reservation Road intersection. It is estimated that future development will remain the same for PM at LOS A. Under With Improvement Future conditions, Project 14 will remain the same as baseline future conditions.

Project 15 evaluated the Del Monte Boulevard and Patton Parkway intersection. This intersection is a future project, and therefore does not have an existing or future no project LOS. Under future with project conditions, the intersection is estimated to have an LOS of A.

Table 8 – Intersection Level of Service Summary
Project #
Existing
Control
Type
Project
Control
Type
Existing 2045 No Project 2045 Project
Delay
sec/veh LOS Delay
sec/veh LOS Delay
sec/veh LOS

1. 2nd Ave. & Inter-Garrison Rd. AWSC Signal 9.4 A 11.1 B 7.9 A

2. Imjni Rd. & 8th St. AWSC RAB 9.2 A 17.7 C 6.2 A

3. California Dr./5th Ave. & 8th St. SSSC RAB 7.2 A 7.2 A 2.9 A

4. Reservation Rd. & Salinas Ave. SSSC Signal 15.8 C 20.5 C 6.1 A

5. Imjin Pkwy. Overpass at SR1 Signal - 22.5 C 63.2 E
New Interchange
with Free Flow6. SR1 Southbound Off-ramp & Imjin Pkwy. Signal - 22.5 C 63.2 E

7. SR1 Southbound On-ramp & Imjin Pkwy. Signal - 22.5 C 63.2 E

8. Del Monte Blvd. & Beach Rd. RAB RAB - - - - - -

9. Imjin Pkwy. & 2nd Ave. Signal Signal 16.3 B 54.9 D 54.5 D

10. Del Monte Blvd. & Reservation Rd. Signal Signal 24.1 C 37.7 C 36.4 C

11. California Ave. & Marina Heights Dr. SSSC Signal 12.1 B 13.0 B 8.4 A

12. SR1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd. SSSC Signal 101.3 F 563.4 F 18.9 B

13. SR1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd. SSSC Signal 14.2 B 20.6 C 11.8 B

14. Cardoza Ave. & Reservation Rd. AWSC Signal 9.4 A 9.5 A 9.5 A

15. Del Monte and Patton Parkway RAB RAB - - - - - A
Note:

Intersections that operate at LOS E or F are Bold.

Intersection and All-way stop-control intersection (AWSC) reported as intersection delay/LOS. Side-street stop-controlled intersections (SSSC) is reported as the worst movement's delay/LOS.

Roundabouts (RAB) report overall delay/LOS
51 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
11 | Page
Roadway Capacity
R o a d w a y L O S a n a l y s i s w a s c o m p l e t e d f o r P r o j e c t s 1 6 t h r o u g h 2 4 .T a b l e 9p r e s e n t s a s u m m a r y o f t h e roadway LOS.

Project 16 e v a l u a t e d D e l M o n t e ( 2 n d A v e ) b e t w e e n R e i n d o l l a r A v e n u e a n d I m j i n P a r k w a y . T h i s r o a d segment is a future project, and therefore does not have an existing or future no project LOS. Under future with project conditions, the roadway is estimated to have an LOS of A.

Project 17 evaluated 8th Street between 3rd Avenue and Inter-Garrison Road. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from A to B. Under With Improvement Future conditions, project 17 will improve roadway operations to LOS A.

Project 18 evaluated Salinas Avenue between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue. This roadway operates at LOS A for Existing, Future, and Future with Improvement conditions.

Project 19 e v a l u a t e d S R 1 I n t e r c h a n g e a t I m j i n P a r k w a y . I t i s e s t i m a t e d t h a t f u t u r e d e v e l o p m e n t w i l l d e t e r i o r a t e t h e e x i s t i n g L O S f r o m A t o F . U n d e r W i t h I m p r o v e m e n t F u t u r e c o n d i t i o n s , p r o j e c t 1 9 w i l l improve roadway operations to LOS A.

Project 20 evaluated Del Monte Boulevard between Beach Road to Marina Greens Drive. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from A to D. Under With Improvement Future conditions, project 20 will improve roadway operations to LOS A.

Project 21 is not considered eligible for the TIF program due to low priority and is not evaluated for the LOS analysis.

Project 22 evaluated Reservation Road between Beach Road to SR1. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from A to D. Under With Improvement Future conditions, project 22 will improve roadway operations to LOS A.

Project 23 evaluated Reservation Road between Imjin Road to Blanco Road. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from A to F. Under With Improvement Future conditions, project 23 will improve roadway operations to LOS C.

Project 24 evaluated new Airport Access Road from University Drive between Research Drive and Ramco access roadway. It is estimated that future development will increase the demand near the airport. Under With Improvement Future conditions, project 24 will have roadway operations at LOS A. 52 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
12 | Page
Table 9 – Roadway Capacity Level of Service Summary
Project #
Facility Type (# Lanes) LOS
Existing Project
Improvements Existing Future No
Project
Future With
Project

16. Del Monte (2nd Ave) between Reindollar
Ave. & Imjin Pkwy. - Collector (2) - - A

17. 8th St. between 3rd Ave. & Inter-Garrison
Rd. Collector (2) Arterial (4) A B A

18. Salinas Ave. between Reservation Rd. &
Carmel Ave Collector (2) Arterial (2) A A A

19. SR 1 Interchange at Imjin Pkwy. Collector (2) Arterial (8) A F A

20. Del Monte Blvd. between Beach Rd. to
Marina Greens Dr. Expressway (4) Expressway (4) A D A

21. SR 1 Interchange at Del Monte Blvd. Arterial (2) Arterial (4) - - -

22. Reservation Rd. between Beach Rd. to SR 1 Collector (2) Collector (2) A D A

23. Reservation Rd. between Imjin Rd. to
Blanco Rd. Arterial (4) Expressway (6) A F C

24. New Airport Access Road between
Research Dr and Ramco facility - Collector (2) - - A
Note: Roadways that operate at LOS E or F areBold.

Roadway Pedestrian and Bicycle
Roadway pedestrian and bicycle improvement analysis was conducted for Projects 25 and 26. The pedestrian level of comfort (LOC) and bicycle level of street (LTS) is summarized in Table 10 and Table 11, respectively.

Project 25 evaluated Reservation Road corridor between Del Monte Boulevard and California Avenue.

Project 25 will improve the LOC from 2 to 1 and LTS from 2 to 1 at majority of the corridor segments.

Project 26 evaluated Del Monte Boulevard between Reindollar Avenue and Reservation Road. Project 26 will improve the LOC from 2 to 1 and LTS from 2 to 1 at majority of the corridor segments. 53 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
13 | Page
Table 10 – Pedestrian Level of Comfort Summary
Project #
Without Project With Project
Min.

Pathway
Width
(ft)

DPL, SBL
or 2SBL?
Min.

Pathway
Buffer
(ft)
LOC
Min.

Pathway
Width
(ft)

DPL, SBL
or 2SBL?
Min.

Pathway
Buffer
(ft)
LOC

25. Reservation Road Corridor
Eastbound
Del Monte Bl to Vista Del Camino Cir 8 SBL 6 2 8 SBL ≥8 1 Vista Del Camino Cir to Crescent Av 10 DPL &
SBL 13 1 10 DPL &
SBL ≥8 1
Crescent Av to California St 10 DPL &
SBL 17 1 10 DPL &
SBL ≥8 1
Westbound
Del Monte Bl to Vista Del Camino Cir 8 DPL &
SBL 13 1 8 SBL ≥8 1
Vista Del Camino Cir to Crescent Av 8 EBL 12 1 8 SBL ≥8 1 Crescent Av to California St 10 DPL &
SBL 13 1 10 DPL &
SBL ≥8 1

26. Del Monte Boulevard Corridor
Northbound
Reindollar Av to Palm Av 9 No DPL
or SBL 8 2 9 SBL ≥8 1
Palm Av to Reservation Rd 9 No DPL
or SBL 9 2 9 SBL ≥8 1
Southbound
Reindollar Av to Palm Av 7 No DPL
or SBL 6 3 7 SBL ≥8 1
Palm Av to Reservation Rd 7 No DPL
or SBL 8 2 7 SBL ≥8 1
Note: LOC=Level of Comfort, DPL=Dedicated Parking Lane, SBL=Separated Bike Lane, 2SBL=Two-way Separated Bike Lane. 54 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
14 | Page
Table 11 – Bicycle Level of Stress Summary
Project #
Without Project With Project
# through
Lanes LTS # through
Lanes LTS

25. Reservation Road Corridor
Eastbound
Del Monte Bl to Vista Del Camino Cir 2 2 2 2
Vista Del Camino Cir to Crescent Av 2 2 1 2
Crescent Av to California St 2 2 1 2
Westbound
Del Monte Bl to Vista Del Camino Cir 2 2 2 1
Vista Del Camino Cir to Crescent Av 2 2 1 1
Crescent Av to California St 2 2 1 1

26. Del Monte Boulevard Corridor
Northbound
Reindollar Av to Palm Av 2 2 2 2
Palm Av to Reservation Rd 2 2 1 2
Southbound
Reindollar Av to Palm Av 2 2 2 1
Palm Av to Reservation Rd 2 2 1 1
Note: Assumed Separated bike lane with buffer & many driveways as project improvements.

Housing Analysis
As mentioned previously, AB 602 requires that studies either calculate a fee levied or imposed on housing development projects proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units or make specified findings explaining why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate the fees. Simply, development impact fees must be charged on a per square feet basis or provide findings that support per unit fees. In order to guide future analysis requirements and help inform the City of Marina as to how AB 602 may impact the TIF program in regard to the housing fee stratification requirement, an analysis was conducted to evaluate housing fees by housing size.

The analysis relied on cross-tabulation of the following three data sources:
· The average number vehicle trips generated by household size (i.e., number of persons in the household) derived from a Big Data platform (Replica) for a typical weekday (Thursday) in the Spring of 2023 which was the latest available data during this analysis 55 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
15 | Page
· The number of single-family housing units in categories of persons per household and square footage of units estimated from the 2021 US Census’ American Housing Survey (AHS) · Building permits by square footage for single family units constructed within the City of Marina and the surrounding areas between 2020 and 2023
The trip generation information was combined with the number of single-family detached units in cross- tabulated categories of persons per household and total household square footage. This resulted in e s t i m a t e s o f v e h i c l e t r i p r a t e s a n d e q u i v a l e n t d w e l l i n g u n i t s ( E D U s ) f o r e a c h s q u a r e f o o t a g e c a t e g o r y established as a part of this analysis. This data was combined with the square footage data for single-family housing units built in the City between 2020 and 2023. The housing size data was provided by the City and verified using real estate sales data available online on Zillow. The resultant dataset was used as the basis for evaluating whether future Nexus Study updates should consider square footage in the development of the fee schedule. The major analysis processes are discussed in detail in the following sections.

Replica Data
Replica is a big data platform that provides demographic and travel data based on multiple data collection sources such as mobile location data, merchant transaction data, census data, land use data, and observed “ground-truth” mobility data. Data from Replica’s Spring 2023 typical Thursday dataset for the City of Marina was used to estimate the number of vehicle trips by persons per household. Table 12 summarizes the trip generation rates for each household category.

Table 12 – City of Marina Trip Generation Data – Replica 2023 Persons per Household Households Trips Daily Home-Based Vehicle Trips
1 6,020 14,886 2.47
2 11,538 42,516 3.68
3 9,142 45,600 4.99
4 9,114 45,436 4.99
5 4,888 24,500 5.01
6 3,599 23,807 6.41
7+ 3,589 25,369 7.07
Total 47,890 221,394
Average 4.62
Source: Replica Spring 2023 Thursday Dataset.

American Housing Survey
The American Housing Survey (AHS), which is conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), collects data on the nation's housing, including data on household characteristics and demographics.

The AHS data is collected in odd numbered years only. The most recent available survey data from 2021 was used. The AHS was designed to include two samples, the National sample, and the independent 56 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
16 | Page
Metropolitan sample. The metropolitan areas that are surveyed and the size of the surveys have been reduced over recent years. While these measures have reduced costs, they also limit the localized data available.

As the AB 602 analysis requires trip generation to be defined by square footage, housing units were cross tabulated by three variables: structure type, square footage, and total persons in the household. This cross- tabulation requires an adequate sample size for each category. The closest available metropolitan area for the City of Marina region was the City of San Jose. However, the San Jose metropolitan area sample size limits its ability to provide information for all square-footage categories and may not be representative of housing in the City of Marina. In addition, the tools available from the Census Bur eau to create cro ss- tabulations from the AHS for the purposes of this analysis indicate that the only sample that can provide a statistically relevant sample for the three required variables is the full national sample. Thus, it was decided that the national sample from the 2021 AHS should be used to define the number of single-family housing units by persons per household and by the square footage of the housing unit. This data is summarized in Table 13.

Table 13 – No. of Single-Family Unit Detached Structures by AHS Square Foot Category Persons per
Household
Total
Units
<500
s.f.
500 to
749 s.f.
750 to
999 s.f.
1,000
to
1,499
s.f.
1,500
to
1,999
s.f.
2,000
to
2,499
s.f.
2,500
to
2,999
s.f.
3,000
to
3,999
s.f.
>4,000
s.f.

Size
Unknown
1 16,679 218 409 1,371 4,854 4,017 2,201 1,010 730 325 1,543 2 29,676 123 321 1,435 6,315 7,451 5,237 3,156 2,838 1,320 1,478 3 13,396 0 99 623 2,825 3,241 2,683 1,229 1,254 477 941 4 12,496 0 116 360 2,182 2,906 2,260 1,553 1,565 862 650 5 5,872 0 38 186 957 1,314 1,122 639 832 406 362
6 2,317 0 0 75 436 445 423 257 288 185 182
7+ 1,308 0 0 45 234 270 215 122 141 120 131
Average per
Household 2.67 1.36 2.04 2.26 2.46 2.62 2.79 2.86 3.05 3.20 2.60 Trip Generation by Categories of Square Footage
The number of trips by household size and persons per household, as well as the estimation of the average trip generation rate for each of the AHS square footage categories, are summarized in Table 14. The trip generation rates were estimated using the following steps:
· Multiply the trip generation rate for a category of “persons per household” estimated from Replica’s trip generation data (see Table 12 ) by the number of single-family units in each AHS square footage category for that same number of persons per household (seeTable 13) · Sum the number of trips generated by all households in an AHS square footage category and divide by the total number of households in that square footage category. 57 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
17 | Page
The differences in trip rates for each household categories shown in Table 14, along with data on recent housing square footages built in the City’s surrounding region, were used to establish the EDU for each AHS square footage category.

Table 14 – Daily Vehicle Trips for All Households in Each AHS Square Foot Category Persons per
Household
Total
Trips
<500
s.f.
500 to
749 s.f.
750 to
999 s.f.
1,000
to
1,499
s.f.
1,500
to
1,999
s.f.
2,000
to
2,499
s.f.
2,500
to
2,999
s.f.
3,000
to
3,999
s.f.
>4,000
s.f.

Size
Unknown
1 30,436 398 746 2,502 8,858 7,330 4,016 1,843 1,332 593 2,816 2 68,631 284 742 3,319 14,605 17,232 12,112 7,299 6,563 3,053 3,418 3 37,258 0 275 1,733 7,857 9,014 7,462 3,418 3,488 1,327 2,617 4 32,401 0 301 933 5,658 7,535 5,860 4,027 4,058 2,235 1,685 5 14,585 0 94 462 2,377 3,264 2,787 1,587 2,066 1,008 899 6 6,535 0 0 212 1,230 1,255 1,193 725 812 522 513
7+ 3,565 0 0 123 638 736 586 332 384 327 357
Average per
Household 2.37 2.00 2.20 2.27 2.32 2.36 2.41 2.41 2.45 2.45 2.33 Recent Housing Built in Surrounding Region
Table 15 groups available data for 112 “non-age-restricted” single-family dwelling units built in the City of Marina between 2020 and 2023 by their square footage. The data indicates that the average size of the single-family dwelling units built in that three-year period was 2,373 square feet. Based on the analysis completed, an EDU of 1.0 was established for the “middle grouping” of single-family units between 2,000 and 2,499 square feet in size (the group in which the cumulative percentage reaches 50-percent). Setting the 1.0 EDU at this group means that housing units smaller than 2,000 square-feet were given an EDU less than 1.0 and dwelling units that are larger than 2,499 square-feet were given an EDU greater than 1.0.

Table 15 – Single-Family Units Built in City of Marina’s Surrounding Region Square Feet Units Percent
Less than 1,000 SF 0 0%
1,000 – 1,499 SF 5 4%
1,500 – 1,999 SF 3 32%
2,000 – 2,499 SF 28 25%
2,500 – 2,999 SF 22 20%
3,000 – 3,999 SF 21 19%
More than 4,000 SF 0 0%
Total 112 100%
Average Square Footage of Single-Family Units 2,373 SF
58 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
18 | Page
Analysis Results
Table 16 summarizes the estimated EDUs for the five recommended single-family dwelling units grouped by their square footage. Note that Table 16 contains fewer groups than Table 15 as the trip generation for dwelling units smaller than 1500 square-feet have similar trip generation characteristics resulting in the same EDU value. Similarly, dwelling units larger than 3000 square-feet were also grouped together because of similar EDU values.

The EDU values summarized in Table 16 were calculated by dividing the average number of trips per household for each group by the average trips per household for the middle (2,000 to 2,499 square feet) group. Table 16 also summarizes the calculated weighted average EDU for each of the AHS square footage categories, which is estimated by multiplying the EDU for each category by the percentage of households in that category (from the 2020 – 2023 available housing data). This calculation shows that the weighted average EDU for “non-age restricted” single-family dwelling units is 1.00. Based on the analysis completed, there is evidence that daily trips are correlated to the square footage of existing residences within the City of Marina and a stratified fee structure based on square footage can be established as part of the AB 602 compliant Nexus Fee Study.

Table 16 – Estimated EDUs for Single-Family Units by Square Foot Groupings Recommended Square
Footage Categories
Average Trip per
Household EDU1 Weighted Average EDU
Less than 1,500 SF 0.94 0.042
1,500 – 1,999 SF 0.99 0.317
2,000 – 2,499 SF 1.00 0.250
2,500 – 2,999 SF 1.01 0.199
More than 3,000 SF 1.02 0.192
Weighted Average of All Groups 1.000
1 Equals avg. trips per household for each grouping divided by the avg. trips per household for the prominent group (2.41).

Alternatively, the City has established a per-square-foot fee structure using the average household size observed in recent residential developments. Note that for multifamily and other residential units, the fee structure remains on a per-unit basis due to the presence of shared common spaces, which makes it difficult to determine the accurate square footage of individual units. 59 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
19 | Page
Nexus Allocation and Fee Calculations
Determining Nexus is a two-step process which establishes the relationship between future needed improvements to the transportation network and future development within the same geography. First the allocation to users must be determined and second the fee based on user type is calculated. These steps identify the highest allowable fee that can be tied to the effects of development with the City.

Allocation to Users
Having previously identified the improvements needed to the transportation network, the cost of those improvements can be proportionally allocated to the users of these facilities. The AMBAG TDM and the citywide growth projections were used in determining the share of project costs that can actually be attributed to growth within the City.

The AMBAG TDM was used to identify traffic patterns within Marina and the surrounding region under both existing baseline conditions and future horizon year conditions. The traffic volume on each link of the model was captured and links associated with TIF projects were identified for further analysis. These two scenario comparisons on TIF Project links in the model allow for isolation of the anticipated growth on each link and the proportion of growth on those links relative to the overall traffic on that link was calculated.

Growth in the model encompasses trips that originate both within the City of Marina and the surrounding County. Therefore, the portion of growth attributable to local trips within the City was also isolated for each proje ct. Local trips ar e those trip s that have eith er an origin or destinatio n (or both) within the City of Marina. Non-local trips, those trips that are just passing-through, were excluded from the fee calculations.

T h i s w a s d o n e b y p r o p o r t i o n a l l y r e d u c i n g t h e e l i g i b l e c o s t f o r i n c l u s i o n i n t h e T I F p r o g r a m o f e a c h T I F project to the share of trips anticipated to use the projects that are local trips. The results of this reduction in eligible cost associated with the local trips analysis is shown in Table 17.

The scope of this analysis is limited to applications within the fee calculation for the Marina TIF and should not be extrapolated to represent the sizing, scope, or policy related to future transportation projects. The size and scope of TIF project is established through nexus and then subsequent allocatable fees are calculated.
60 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
20 | Page
Table 17 – Project Costs Eligible for TIF
ID Project Total Cost
Estimate % of New Local Trips Cost Eligible for TIF
1 2nd Avenue & Inter-Garrison Road $875,200 100% $875,200 2 Imjin Road & 8th Street $1,800,000 30% $548,600
3 California Drive & 8th Street $1,750,300 93% $1,635,300 4 Reservation Road & Salinas Avenue $2,438,600 100% $2,438,600 5 Imjin Parkway bridge @ SR 1 $41,400 27% $11,100
6 SR 1 Southbound off-ramp @ Imjin Parkway $3,182,400 27% $851,700 7 SR 1 Southbound on-ramp @ Imjin Parkway $795,600 27% $213,000 8 Del Monte Boulevard & Beach Road - - -
9 Imjin Parkway & 2nd Avenue $6,583,200 42% $2,779,400
10 Reservation Road & Del Monte Boulevard $2,800,000 100% $2,800,000 11 California Avenue & Marina Heights Drive $1,384,400 100% $1,384,400 12 SR1 Southbound Ramp @ Reservation Rd $4,000,000 17% $684,000 13 SR1 Northbound Ramp @ Reservation Road $4,000,000 96% $3,822,100 14 Cardoza Avenue & Reservation Road $3,500,000 95% $3,338,200 15 Del Monte Boulevard & Patton Parkway $6,000,000 100% $6,000,000 Total Cost for Intersection Projects $39,151,100 70% $27,381,600 16 Del Monte Boulevard Extension $17,000,000 100% $17,000,000 17 8th Street from California Ave to Inter-Garrison Rd $9,449,700 53% $5,003,300 18 Salinas Ave - Reservation Road to Carmel Ave $3,450,000 100% $3,450,000 19 Imjin Parkway & SR1 Interchange $24,385,300 32% $7,734,500 20 Del Monte Blvd - Beach Road to Marina Greens Dr $13,411,900 100% $13,388,100 21 Del Monte Boulevard & SR 1 Interchange - - -
22 Reservation Road – Beach Road to SR 1 $6,099,250 96% $5,829,100 23 Reservation Road - Imjin Road to Blanco Road $13,036,400 47% $6,071,100 24 Airport Access Road $6,190,000 100% $6,190,000
25 Reservation Rd – Del Monte Blvd to California St $31,174,100 30% $9,352,300 26 Del Monte Blvd – Reindollar Ave to Reservation Rd $16,258,700 30% $4,877,700 Total Cost for Roadway Projects $140,455,350 56% $78,896,100 Total Cost for Transportation Projects: $179,606,450 59% $106,277,700 61 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
21 | Page
Fee Calculations
The actual fee per trip were calculated by dividing the total eligible cost for all TIF projects by the total estimated growth in Daily trips on the roadway network at buildout of the City’s General Plan and Housing Element Update. These calculations also introduce a three percent (3.0%) administration charge for the fee program. T a b l e 1 8s h o w s t h i s c a l c u l a t i o n r e s u l t s i n a b a s e f e e p e r t r i p o f $ 5 8 0 . 9 1 a n d $ 2 , 1 3 6 . 5 6 f o r intersection and roadway projects, respectively. Table 19 then uses the adjusted daily trip demand factor to apply this fee across each land use type.

Table 18 – Calculation of Fee per Adjusted Daily Trip
Calculation Intersections Roadways Total
Cost Eligible for TIF $27,381,600 $78,896,100 $106,277,700 Administrative Fee (3% of total costs) $821,448 $2,366,883 $3,188,331 Total Impact Fee Revenue Allocated1 -$879,922 -$4,239,501 -$5,119,423 Subtotal Impact Fee Program Funding after
Contribution from Impact Fee $27,323,126 $77,023,482 $104,346,608 Growth in Adjusted Daily Trips 46,851 46,851 46,851
Fee per Trip $583.19 $1,644.00 $2,227.19
1 Total revenue allocation includes fairshare of fee collected as part of the TIF as of June 30, 2024 for development projects.

Table 19 – Fee per Land Use Category
Land Use Category Unit
Adjusted Daily
Trip Demand
Factor
Fee per Unit
Intersections
Fee per Unit
Roadways
Total
Fee per
Unit
Residential
Single Family Detached KSF 9.15 $2,134 $6,015 $8,149
Single Family Attached(Town Homes) KSF 6.98 $1,629 $4,593 $6,222 Senior Homes DU 4.18 $2,438 $6,873 $9,311
Assisted Living – Senior DU 2.52 $1,471 $4,146 $5,617
Multifamily DU 6.54 $3,813 $10,748 $14,561
Nonresidential
Office/Research KSF 10.41 $6,069 $17,108 $23,177
Retail/Service KSF 16.61 $9,688 $27,309 $36,997
Industrial KSF 4.77 $2,783 $7,846 $10,629
Hotel ROOM 7.67 $4,473 $12,610 $17,083
Church KSF 6.92 $4,033 $11,370 $15,403
Day Care Center KSF 40.95 $23,883 $67,327 $91,211
Animal Hospital/Clinic KSF 21.07 $12,288 $34,639 $46,927 Medical/Dental Office KSF 35.28 $20,575 $58,000 $78,575 62 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
22 | Page
The fees presented here represent the maximum eligible fees attributable to new growth and development within the City of Marina and also serves as a ceiling to the fee schedule eventually adopted by the City Council. As mentioned earlier, as part of the AB 602 compliant Nexus Fee Study the City has established a per-square-foot fee structure using the average household size observed in recent residential developments. Note that for multifamily and other residential units, the fee structure remains on a per- unit basis due to the presence of shared common spaces, which makes it difficult to determine the accurate square footage of individual units.

Table 20 shows the fees for the single-family residential units based on a per-unit fee structure, for the purposes of comparison with the current fees.

Table 20 – Fee for Single Family Residential Land Use by Units Land Use Category Unit
Adjusted Daily
Trip Demand
Factor
Fee per Unit
Intersections
Fee per Unit
Roadways
Total
Fee per Unit
Single Family Detached DU 9.15 $5,334 $15,038 $20,372
Single Family Attached(Town Homes) DU 6.98 $4,073 $11,482 $15,555 Fee for Single Family units are shown per Unit basis for a typical home size in Marina with an average size of 2,500 sq.ft. 63 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
23 | Page
Required Program Elements
This report has provided a detailed discussion of the elements of the Marina Transportation Impact Fee program and explained the analytical techniques used to develop this nexus study. The report addresses the fee program elements required by Government Code 66000-66025, as summarized below.

1. Identifying the purpose of the fee
§ The purpose of the Marina Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) program is to provide funding for public infrastructure improvements that are needed to mitigate the transportation- related impacts of new development in Marina.

2. Identifying how the fee will be used and the facilities to be funded through the fee § The fee is used to help fund capital improvement projects that will accommodate future transportation needs throughout the City of Marina. Table 1 identifies the projects to be funded through the TIF fee.

3. Determining a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development on which the fee is imposed
§ As described in this report, different types of development generate traffic with different characteristics. The calculations presented in Table 5 account for these characteristics by calculating the travel-related characteristics of different land use types. These considerations account for the difference in impacts on the local transportation system generated by different land use types.

4. Determining a reasonable relationship between the need for the roadway and intersection improvements and the type of development on which the fee is imposed § The need for the facilities listed in Table 1 has been established through local planning processes prepared by the City of Marina and building upon the adopted General Plan and Housing Element Update.

5. Determining a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility (or portion of facility) attributable to new development § Fee Calculation Section of this report describes the calculations completed to determine the cost of the roadway and intersection projects that is attributable to new development in the TIF area. A reasonable effort has been made to quantitatively establish the relationship between the fees charged in the TIF program and the costs of improvements attributable to new development within the City of Marina. 64 Traffic Impact Fee Program Update
Nexus Study Marina, California
24 | Page
Appendices
Appendix A: Level of Service Analysis Outputs
65 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
1: 2nd Ave & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 35
Intersection LOS D
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 11 128 20 106 695
Future Vol, veh/h 3 11 128 20 106 695
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 12 138 22 114 747
Number of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 0 2
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 0
HCM Control Delay 9.1 9 40.3

HCM LOS A A E
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 128 20 3 11 106 695
LT Vol 0 0 3 0 106 0
Through Vol 128 0 0 0 0 695
RT Vol 0 20 0 11 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 138 22 3 12 114 747
Geometry Grp 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.202 0.027 0.007 0.02 0.163 0.963
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.29 4.585 7.28 6.066 5.139 4.638 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 681 784 494 592 692 777
Service Time 2.997 2.293 4.994 3.779 2.916 2.415
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.203 0.028 0.006 0.02 0.165 0.961
HCM Control Delay 9.3 7.4 10 8.9 8.9 45.1
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A E
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 0.1 0 0.1 0.6 14.9
66 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh41.1
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 6 0 7 4 42 0 5 21 597 5 2
Future Vol, veh/h 11 6 0 7 4 42 0 5 21 597 5 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 12 6 0 8 4 45 0 5 23 642 5 2
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay 9.7 9.2 8.3 46.2

HCM LOS A A A E
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 99% 0%
Vol Thru, % 19% 0% 100% 0% 9% 1% 0%
Vol Right, % 81% 0% 0% 0% 91% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 26 11 6 7 46 602 2
LT Vol 0 11 0 7 0 597 0
Through Vol 5 0 6 0 4 5 0
RT Vol 21 0 0 0 42 0 2
Lane Flow Rate 28 12 6 8 49 647 2
Geometry Grp 4b 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.039 0.023 0.012 0.015 0.08 0.953 0.002 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.079 7.017 6.509 6.951 5.794 5.3 4.103 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 701 508 548 514 616 686 877
Service Time 3.136 4.783 4.274 4.706 3.548 3 1.803
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.024 0.011 0.016 0.08 0.943 0.002 HCM Control Delay 8.3 9.9 9.4 9.8 9.1 46.3 6.8
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A E A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.1 0 0 0.3 13.7 0
67 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 1 14 0 2 6 14 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 1 14 0 2 6 14 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 4 1 18 0 3 8 18 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1 0 0 19 28 1
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1 1 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 18 27 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1622 - - 998 865 1084
Stage 1 0 - - - - - 1022 895 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - - 1005 873 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1622 - - 996 0 1084
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 996 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1022 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1003 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 8.4

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 - - 7.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - -
68 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 135 732 0 2 872 25 0 0 0 165 0 470 Future Volume (veh/h) 135 732 0 2 872 25 0 0 0 165 0 470 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 144 779 0 2 928 27 0 0 0 176 0 500 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 175 1439 0 6 1094 32 0 892 0 224 10 544
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 1781 3526 103 0 1870 0 379 22 1139 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 144 779 0 2 468 487 0 0 0 676 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 1852 0 1870 0 1541 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.3 17.5 0.0 0.1 25.8 25.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.2 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.3 17.5 0.0 0.1 25.8 25.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.74
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 175 1439 0 6 551 574 0 892 0 778 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.54 0.00 0.35 0.85 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 238 1596 0 102 662 690 0 1162 0 1000 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.3 23.7 0.0 52.0 33.8 33.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 15.4 0.3 0.0 32.2 8.7 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.4 7.2 0.0 0.1 12.2 12.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.7 24.0 0.0 84.3 42.5 42.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E C A F D D A A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 923 957 0 676
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.9 42.5 0.0 32.1
Approach LOS C D C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 53.9 4.3 46.4 53.9 14.3 36.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 6.0 47.0 65.0 14.0 39.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 2.1 19.5 44.7 10.3 27.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 6.0 5.2 0.1 4.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 35.2
HCM 6th LOS D
69 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh25.4
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 25 138 158 54 27 49 178 33 11 375 22 Future Vol, veh/h 31 25 138 158 54 27 49 178 33 11 375 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 36 29 160 184 63 31 57 207 38 13 436 26
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 15.6 19.3 19.3 37.6

HCM LOS C C C E
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 19% 16% 66% 3%
Vol Thru, % 68% 13% 23% 92%
Vol Right, % 13% 71% 11% 5%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 260 194 239 408
LT Vol 49 31 158 11
Through Vol 178 25 54 375
RT Vol 33 138 27 22
Lane Flow Rate 302 226 278 474
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.582 0.441 0.562 0.86
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.927 7.034 7.278 6.528
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 520 510 495 555
Service Time 4.987 5.099 5.338 4.58
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.581 0.443 0.562 0.854
HCM Control Delay 19.3 15.6 19.3 37.6
HCM Lane LOS C C C E
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.7 2.2 3.4 9.3
70 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 871 498 392 761 0 120 0 102 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 871 498 392 761 0 120 0 102 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 907 519 408 793 0 125 0 106 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 3 1701 758 588 2563 0 320 251 211 3 6 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.17 0.72 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1583 3456 3647 0 3456 1870 1574 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 907 519 408 793 0 125 0 106 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1583 1728 1777 0 1728 1870 1574 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 9.9 14.1 6.1 4.4 0.0 1.9 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 9.9 14.1 6.1 4.4 0.0 1.9 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1701 758 588 2563 0 320 251 211 3 6 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.53 0.69 0.69 0.31 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 193 2827 1259 1437 3919 0 562 1387 1167 193 2442 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 10.1 11.2 21.6 2.8 0.0 23.6 0.0 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 3.2 4.2 2.4 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 10.4 12.3 23.1 2.8 0.0 24.4 0.0 24.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A B B C A A C A C A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1426 1201 231 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.1 9.7 24.2 0.0
Approach LOS B A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 0.0 11.4 13.4 30.5 9.1 2.3 0.0 43.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 41.0 23.0 44.0 9.0 38.0 6.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 5.5 8.1 16.1 3.9 0.0 0.0 6.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 1.3 10.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.6
HCM 6th LOS B
71 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 235 123 338 122 162 95 165 229 225 277 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 235 123 338 122 162 95 165 229 225 277 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 17 270 141 389 140 186 109 190 263 259 318 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 25 407 222 679 367 304 155 401 589 407 877 14 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.09 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 136 2176 1188 3456 1870 1549 1781 1870 2744 3456 3580 56 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 234 0 194 389 140 186 109 190 263 259 158 165 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1864 0 1636 1728 1870 1549 1781 1870 1372 1728 1777 1859 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 0.0 6.2 5.7 3.7 6.2 3.4 5.0 4.7 4.0 4.1 4.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.6 0.0 6.2 5.7 3.7 6.2 3.4 5.0 4.7 4.0 4.1 4.2 Prop In Lane 0.07 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 349 0 306 679 367 304 155 401 589 407 435 456 V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.00 0.63 0.57 0.38 0.61 0.70 0.47 0.45 0.64 0.36 0.36 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 662 0 581 1841 997 825 949 997 1462 1227 1262 1321 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh21.3 0.0 21.1 20.5 19.6 20.7 25.0 19.3 19.2 23.7 17.6 17.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.0 2.2 0.8 0.6 2.0 5.7 0.9 0.5 1.7 0.5 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 0.0 2.3 2.2 1.5 2.2 1.5 2.0 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.5 0.0 23.3 21.2 20.3 22.6 30.6 20.2 19.7 25.4 18.1 18.1 LnGrp LOS C A C C C C C C B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 428 715 562 582
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.4 21.4 22.0 21.3
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.6 16.1 14.5 8.9 17.8 15.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 7.0 8.6 5.4 6.2 8.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 2.1 2.0 0.3 1.9 2.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.9
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
72 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 865 248 566 42 30 1327
Future Volume (veh/h) 865 248 566 42 30 1327
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 940 270 615 46 33 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1156 2806 739 626 311
Arrive On Green 0.33 0.79 0.39 0.39 0.09 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 940 270 615 46 33 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 16.6 1.2 19.7 1.2 0.6 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.6 1.2 19.7 1.2 0.6 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1156 2806 739 626 311
V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.10 0.83 0.07 0.11
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1973 4697 1292 1095 1765
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh20.2 1.6 18.2 12.5 27.8 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.1 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.3 0.1 8.1 0.4 0.2 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.7 1.6 20.7 12.6 28.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS C A C B C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1210 661 33
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.2 20.1 28.0
Approach LOS B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 56.6 10.0 26.3 30.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 38.0 46.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 2.6 18.6 21.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 0.1 3.7 4.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 73 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 115 146 17 61 616
Future Vol, veh/h 38 115 146 17 61 616
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 1 0 2 2 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 115 0 - 80 75 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 42 126 160 19 67 677
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 975 163 0 0 181 0
Stage 1 162 - - - - -
Stage 2 813 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 279 882 - - 1394 -
Stage 1 867 - - - - -
Stage 2 436 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 264 879 - - 1391 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 264 - - - - -
Stage 1 865 - - - - -
Stage 2 414 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.6 0 0.7

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 264 879 1391 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.158 0.144 0.048 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 21.2 9.8 7.7 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.6 0.5 0.2 -
74 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.5
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 12 16 83 8 19 7 87 15 14 319 0
Future Vol, veh/h 4 12 16 83 8 19 7 87 15 14 319 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 5 14 19 97 9 22 8 101 17 16 371 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8.5 9.6 9.1 13.2

HCM LOS A A A B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 12% 75% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 85% 38% 7% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 15% 50% 17% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 7 102 32 110 14 319
LT Vol 7 0 4 83 14 0
Through Vol 0 87 12 8 0 319
RT Vol 0 15 16 19 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 8 119 37 128 16 371
Geometry Grp 5 5 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.013 0.172 0.053 0.188 0.025 0.524
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.838 5.23 5.133 5.304 5.59 5.087 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 610 682 692 673 638 705
Service Time 3.602 2.993 3.207 3.362 3.34 2.837
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.174 0.053 0.19 0.025 0.526
HCM Control Delay 8.7 9.1 8.5 9.6 8.5 13.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.1 3.1
75 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 47.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 36 20 328 33 0 0 0 0 193 40 10
Future Vol, veh/h 0 36 20 328 33 0 0 0 0 193 40 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 250 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 41 23 377 38 0 0 0 0 222 46 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 64 0 0 847 856 38
Stage 1 - - - - - - 792 792 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 55 64 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1538 - 0 332 295 1034
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 446 401 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 968 842 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1538 - - 251 0 1034
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 251 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 446 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 731 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 7.4 117.6

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1538 - 261
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.245 - 1.07
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.1 - 117.6
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1 - 11.4
76 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
15: SR 1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 228 0 0 335 218 11 0 108 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 14 228 0 0 335 218 11 0 108 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 4 4 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 225 - - - - 120 - - 25 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 15 245 0 0 360 234 12 0 116 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 599 0 - - - 0 753 874 245
Stage 1 - - - - - - 275 275 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 478 599 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 978 - 0 0 - - 377 288 794
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 771 683 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 624 490 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 978 - - - - - 371 0 794
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 371 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 759 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 623 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 10.7

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 371 794 978 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.032 0.146 0.015 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 15 10.3 8.7 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.5 0 - - -
77 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
16: Salinas Ave/Driveway & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 689 2 7 797 0 1 0 7 0 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 689 2 7 797 0 1 0 7 0 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 150 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 811 2 8 938 0 1 0 8 0 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 938 0 0 815 0 0 1300 1769 408 1362 1771 469 Stage 1 - - - - - - 815 815 - 954 954 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 485 954 - 408 817 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 726 - - 808 - 0 119 83 593 107 82 541 Stage 1 - - - - - 0 338 389 - 278 335 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 0 532 335 - 591 388 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 726 - - 806 - - 117 82 592 104 81 541 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 117 82 - 104 81 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 336 387 - 277 332 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 526 332 - 581 386 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 14.4 11.7

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 393 726 - - 806 - 541
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.002 - - 0.01 - 0.002
HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 10 - - 9.5 - 11.7
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - 0
78 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
18: Driveway/Cardoza Ave & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 38 295 3 10 422 24 6 0 20 70 0 124 Future Volume (veh/h) 38 295 3 10 422 24 6 0 20 70 0 124 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 40 314 3 11 449 26 6 0 21 74 0 132 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 99 1466 638 31 700 591 162 43 253 510 0 325
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.41 0.41 0.02 0.37 0.37 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1546 1781 1870 1579 140 210 1225 1385 0 1574 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 314 3 11 449 26 27 0 0 74 0 132 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1546 1781 1870 1579 1574 0 0 1385 0 1574 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 1.9 0.0 0.2 6.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 2.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 1.9 0.0 0.2 6.5 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22 0.78 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 99 1466 638 31 700 591 459 0 0 510 0 325 V/C Ratio(X) 0.40 0.21 0.00 0.35 0.64 0.04 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.41 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 701 7530 3277 485 3737 3154 1911 0 0 1858 0 1858 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.1 6.3 5.7 16.0 8.5 6.6 10.6 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 11.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.1 0.0 6.7 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.7 6.3 5.7 22.8 9.5 6.6 10.6 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 12.2 LnGrp LOS B A A C A A B A A B A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 357 486 27 206
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.6 9.6 10.6 11.8
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.8 4.6 17.6 10.8 5.8 16.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.0 9.0 70.0 39.0 13.0 66.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 2.2 3.9 4.4 2.7 8.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 2.3 1.1 0.0 3.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.4
HCM 6th LOS A
79 80
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
4: Highway 1 SB Ramp & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 835 0 0 0 437 33
Future Volume (vph) 835 0 0 0 437 33
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1780
Flt Permitted 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1780
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Adj. Flow (vph) 938 0 0 0 491 37
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 938 0 0 0 0 528
Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 8 1 6
Permitted Phases 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 63.1 37.5
Effective Green, g (s) 63.1 37.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.35
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1028 614
v/s Ratio Prot c0.53 c0.30
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.91 0.86
Uniform Delay, d1 20.3 33.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 12.0 11.6
Delay (s) 32.3 44.7
Level of Service C D
Approach Delay (s) 32.3 0.0 44.7
Approach LOS C A D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 36.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 108.6 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
81 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
8: 4th St & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 114 46 157 336 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 114 46 157 336 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Hourly flow rate (vph) 121 49 167 357 0 0
Pedestrians 12 2 7
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 1 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 177 856 154
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 177 856 154
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 88 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1399 286 890
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 170 524
Volume Left 0 167
Volume Right 49 0
cSH 1700 1399
Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 10
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.3
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 3.3
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
82 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
17: Imjin Rd & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 649 241 366 781 29 30
Future Volume (vph) 649 241 366 781 29 30
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91
Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3396 1770 3539 3342 1441
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 3396 1770 3539 3342 1441
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 690 256 389 831 31 32
RTOR Reduction (vph) 26 0 0 0 11 18
Lane Group Flow (vph) 920 0 389 831 32 2
Turn Type NA Prot NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 29.3 23.0 56.3 6.8 6.8
Effective Green, g (s) 29.3 23.0 56.3 6.8 6.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.32 0.79 0.10 0.10
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1399 572 2802 319 137
v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 c0.22 0.23
v/s Ratio Perm c0.01 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.66 0.68 0.30 0.10 0.01
Uniform Delay, d1 16.9 20.9 2.0 29.4 29.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 3.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
Delay (s) 18.0 24.2 2.1 29.5 29.2
Level of Service B C A C C
Approach Delay (s) 18.0 9.1 29.4
Approach LOS B A C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 13.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 71.1 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
83 MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Existing 2023

AM)]
Output produced by SIDRA

INTERSECTION V
ersion: 9.1.1.200
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
Demand Flows
Arrival Flows
95% Back Of Queue
Mov
ID
T
urn
Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
f.

Stop Rate
A
ver
.

No. of
Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Del Monte Blvd
3 L2
All MCs
151

2.0 151

2.0 0.403

7.4 LOS
A

2.4 60.4

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.0
8 T1
All MCs
227

2.0 227

2.0 0.403

7.4 LOS
A

2.4 60.4

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.6
18 R2
All MCs
62 2.0
62 2.0

0.403

7.4 LOS
A

2.4 60.4

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.4
Approach
440

2.0 440

2.0 0.403

7.4 LOS
A

2.4 60.4

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.4
East: Beach Rd
1 L2
All MCs
162

2.0 162

2.0 0.417

9.1 LOS
A

2.3 59.4

0.64 0.51

0.69 30.1
6 T1
All MCs
133

2.0 133

2.0 0.417

9.1 LOS
A

2.3 59.4

0.64 0.51

0.69 30.7
16 R2
All MCs
66 2.0
66 2.0

0.417

9.1 LOS
A

2.3 59.4

0.64 0.51

0.69 30.4
Approach
360

2.0 360

2.0 0.417

9.1 LOS
A

2.3 59.4

0.64 0.51

0.69 30.4
North: Del Monte Blvd
7 L2
All MCs
77 2.0
77 2.0

0.654

15.0 LOS B

7.0 177.8

0.81 0.83

1.33 28.5
4 T1
All MCs
408

2.0 408

2.0 0.654

15.0 LOS B

7.0 177.8

0.81 0.83

1.33 28.9
14 R2
All MCs
67 2.0
67 2.0

0.654

15.0 LOS B

7.0 177.8

0.81 0.83

1.33 28.7
Approach
552

2.0 552

2.0 0.654

15.0 LOS B

7.0 177.8

0.81 0.83

1.33 28.8
W
est: Beach Rd
5 L2
All MCs
45 2.0
45 2.0

0.374

10.2 LOS B

1.8 47.0

0.69 0.64

0.79 30.2
2 T1
All MCs
82 2.0
82 2.0

0.374

10.2 LOS B

1.8 47.0

0.69 0.64

0.79 30.7
12 R2
All MCs
127

2.0 127

2.0 0.374

10.2 LOS B

1.8 47.0

0.69 0.64

0.79 30.5
Approach
255

2.0 255

2.0 0.374

10.2 LOS B

1.8 47.0

0.69 0.64

0.79 30.5
All V
ehicles
1607

2.0 1607

2.0 0.654

10.8 LOS B

7.0 177.8

0.67 0.58

0.87 30.1
84 SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Existing 2023

AM)]
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

ASSOCIA

TES INC
|
Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2
|
Created:

T
uesday
, May 14,
2024 4:07:47 PM
Project:
\\kimley
-
horn.com\ca_pls1\Project\SJC_TPT
O\City of Marina\097789003
-
Marina DIF\2023
Update\05 Design &
Analys
is\Sidra\Marina DIF 2023.
sip9
85 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
1: 2nd Ave & Inter-Garrison Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.4
Intersection LOS A
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 66 223 11 52 191
Future Vol, veh/h 19 66 223 11 52 191
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 19 67 228 11 53 195
Number of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 0 2
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 0
HCM Control Delay 8.4 9.9 9.3

HCM LOS A A A
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 223 11 19 66 52 191
LT Vol 0 0 19 0 52 0
Through Vol 223 0 0 0 0 191
RT Vol 0 11 0 66 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 228 11 19 67 53 195
Geometry Grp 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.315 0.013 0.033 0.093 0.08 0.268
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.977 4.274 6.196 4.989 5.459 4.956 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 724 837 578 718 657 725
Service Time 2.703 2 3.931 2.723 3.185 2.683
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.315 0.013 0.033 0.093 0.081 0.269
HCM Control Delay 10 7.1 9.1 8.2 8.7 9.5
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 0 0.1 0.3 0.3 1.1
86 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.2
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 9 1 28 1 194 0 28 32 106 24 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 9 1 28 1 194 0 28 32 106 24 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 10 1 32 1 223 0 32 37 122 28 3
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay 8.2 8.9 8.6 10

HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 82% 0%
Vol Thru, % 47% 100% 90% 0% 1% 18% 0%
Vol Right, % 53% 0% 10% 0% 99% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 60 0 10 28 195 130 3
LT Vol 0 0 0 28 0 106 0
Through Vol 28 0 9 0 1 24 0
RT Vol 32 0 1 0 194 0 3
Lane Flow Rate 69 0 11 32 224 149 3
Geometry Grp 4b 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.097 0 0.017 0.051 0.278 0.234 0.004 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.048 5.391 5.321 5.659 4.458 5.632 4.519 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 708 0 672 634 807 637 790
Service Time 3.091 3.133 3.062 3.384 2.182 3.372 2.258
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.097 0 0.016 0.05 0.278 0.234 0.004 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.1 8.2 8.7 8.9 10.1 7.3
HCM Lane LOS A N A A A B A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0 0.1 0.2 1.1 0.9 0
87 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 10 1 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 10 1 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 13 1 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 0
Stage 1 - - - - - - 2 2 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 9 9 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1619 - - - - - 1009 884 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1021 894 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1014 888 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1619 - - - - - 1007 0 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1007 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1020 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1013 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 7.2

HCM LOS -
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 1619 - - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.001 - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - 7.2 - - - - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - - - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - - - -
88 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 289 1122 0 1 870 60 0 0 0 27 0 210 Future Volume (veh/h) 289 1122 0 1 870 60 0 0 0 27 0 210 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 295 1145 0 1 888 61 0 0 0 28 0 214 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 365 2072 0 3 1281 88 0 392 0 90 17 293
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 1781 3373 232 0 1870 0 103 80 1400 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 295 1145 0 1 468 481 0 0 0 242 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 1828 0 1870 0 1583 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.2 11.6 0.0 0.0 12.9 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.2 11.6 0.0 0.0 12.9 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.88
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 365 2072 0 3 675 694 0 392 0 401 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.55 0.00 0.33 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1038 4505 0 183 1400 1440 0 1218 0 1090 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.1 7.5 0.0 29.1 15.2 15.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.3 0.2 0.0 52.9 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.0 3.3 0.0 0.1 4.8 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.4 7.7 0.0 82.0 16.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A A F B B A A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1440 950 0 242
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.5 16.6 0.0 22.9
Approach LOS B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.2 4.1 38.0 16.2 16.0 26.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.0 6.0 74.0 38.0 34.0 46.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 2.0 13.6 10.3 11.2 14.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 11.8 1.6 0.9 7.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.4
HCM 6th LOS B
89 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh11.9
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 43 36 56 19 26 58 185 123 36 164 42 Future Vol, veh/h 32 43 36 56 19 26 58 185 123 36 164 42 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 35 47 40 62 21 29 64 203 135 40 180 46
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 10.1 10.1 13.4 11.2

HCM LOS B B B B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 16% 29% 55% 15%
Vol Thru, % 51% 39% 19% 68%
Vol Right, % 34% 32% 26% 17%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 366 111 101 242
LT Vol 58 32 56 36
Through Vol 185 43 19 164
RT Vol 123 36 26 42
Lane Flow Rate 402 122 111 266
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.542 0.192 0.178 0.376
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.85 5.661 5.774 5.084
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 748 633 620 707
Service Time 2.85 3.708 3.823 3.117
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.537 0.193 0.179 0.376
HCM Control Delay 13.4 10.1 10.1 11.2
HCM Lane LOS B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.3 0.7 0.6 1.8
90 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1138 400 240 877 0 418 0 283 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1138 400 240 877 0 418 0 283 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1185 417 250 914 0 435 0 295 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 3 1697 755 357 2272 0 572 455 384 3 67 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.10 0.64 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1582 3456 3647 0 3456 1870 1577 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1185 417 250 914 0 435 0 295 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1582 1728 1777 0 1728 1870 1577 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 17.8 12.7 4.8 8.5 0.0 8.2 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 17.8 12.7 4.8 8.5 0.0 8.2 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1697 755 357 2272 0 572 455 384 3 67 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.70 0.55 0.70 0.40 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 157 2453 1092 558 2713 0 964 1373 1158 157 1931 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 13.9 12.6 29.5 6.0 0.0 27.1 0.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.5 0.6 2.5 0.1 0.0 2.1 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 6.3 4.1 2.0 2.5 0.0 3.4 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 14.5 13.3 32.0 6.1 0.0 29.2 0.0 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A B B C A A C A C A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1602 1164 730 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.2 11.7 28.4 0.0
Approach LOS B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 0.0 20.6 11.0 36.5 15.3 5.3 0.0 47.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 50.0 11.0 47.0 19.0 37.0 6.0 52.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 13.9 6.8 19.8 10.2 0.0 0.0 10.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.1 0.3 12.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 8.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.3
HCM 6th LOS B
91 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 189 83 303 222 209 112 226 566 224 119 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 189 83 303 222 209 112 226 566 224 119 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 199 87 319 234 220 118 238 596 236 125 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 25 311 139 749 405 328 157 543 780 364 1090 26 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 182 2285 1024 3456 1870 1512 1781 1870 2689 3456 3544 85 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 164 0 138 319 234 220 118 238 596 236 62 66 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1861 0 1630 1728 1870 1512 1781 1870 1344 1728 1777 1852 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 0.0 5.1 5.1 7.1 8.5 4.1 6.6 12.8 4.2 1.6 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 0.0 5.1 5.1 7.1 8.5 4.1 6.6 12.8 4.2 1.6 1.6 Prop In Lane 0.10 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 253 0 222 749 405 328 157 543 780 364 546 569 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.62 0.43 0.58 0.67 0.75 0.44 0.76 0.65 0.11 0.12 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 586 0 513 1631 883 714 841 883 1269 1088 1118 1166 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh26.0 0.0 25.9 21.5 22.3 22.8 28.3 18.3 20.6 27.3 15.8 15.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.8 0.0 2.9 0.4 1.3 2.4 7.1 0.6 1.6 1.9 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.0 2.1 2.0 3.1 3.0 2.0 2.7 3.8 1.7 0.6 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.8 0.0 28.8 21.9 23.6 25.2 35.4 18.9 22.2 29.2 15.9 15.9 LnGrp LOS C A C C C C D B C C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 302 773 952 364
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.8 23.3 23.0 24.5
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.7 22.4 12.6 9.6 23.5 17.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s6.2 14.8 7.3 6.1 3.6 10.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 3.6 1.4 0.3 0.7 3.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.1
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved ignoring U-Turning movement.
92 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1101 538 323 28 38 956
Future Volume (veh/h) 1101 538 323 28 38 956
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1159 566 340 29 40 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1459 2638 461 391 382
Arrive On Green 0.42 0.74 0.25 0.25 0.11 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1159 566 340 29 40 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 15.8 2.7 9.1 0.8 0.6 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.8 2.7 9.1 0.8 0.6 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1459 2638 461 391 382
V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.21 0.74 0.07 0.10
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2609 5758 1481 1255 2163
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh13.6 2.1 18.8 15.7 21.7 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 2.3 0.1 0.1 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.3 0.3 3.8 0.3 0.2 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.7 2.2 21.2 15.8 21.9 0.0
LnGrp LOS B A C B C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1725 369 40
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.6 20.7 21.9
Approach LOS B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 44.3 10.0 26.9 17.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 41.0 43.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.7 2.6 17.8 11.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.5 0.1 5.1 2.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.5
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 93 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 63 318 33 64 197
Future Vol, veh/h 29 63 318 33 64 197
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 1 0 3 3 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 115 0 - 80 75 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 31 67 338 35 68 210
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 690 342 0 0 376 0
Stage 1 341 - - - - -
Stage 2 349 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 411 701 - - 1182 -
Stage 1 720 - - - - -
Stage 2 714 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 385 698 - - 1179 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 385 - - - - -
Stage 1 718 - - - - -
Stage 2 670 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 12.1 0 2

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 385 698 1179 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.08 0.096 0.058 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.2 10.7 8.2 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.3 0.3 0.2 -
94 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.6
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 11 4 53 23 100 11 144 26 9 102 4
Future Vol, veh/h 3 11 4 53 23 100 11 144 26 9 102 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 14 5 66 29 125 14 180 33 11 128 5
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8.3 9.5 10.1 9.3

HCM LOS A A B A
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 17% 30% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 85% 61% 13% 0% 96%
Vol Right, % 0% 15% 22% 57% 0% 4%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 11 170 18 176 9 106
LT Vol 11 0 3 53 9 0
Through Vol 0 144 11 23 0 102
RT Vol 0 26 4 100 0 4
Lane Flow Rate 14 212 22 220 11 132
Geometry Grp 5 5 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.022 0.304 0.032 0.282 0.018 0.196
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.762 5.15 5.062 4.618 5.843 5.312 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 619 695 702 777 610 672
Service Time 3.519 2.907 3.127 2.66 3.605 3.074
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 0.305 0.031 0.283 0.018 0.196
HCM Control Delay 8.6 10.2 8.3 9.5 8.7 9.4
HCM Lane LOS A B A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 1.3 0.1 1.2 0.1 0.7
95 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 42.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 85 35 214 94 0 0 0 0 244 0 40
Future Vol, veh/h 0 85 35 214 94 0 0 0 0 244 0 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 250 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 105 43 264 116 0 0 0 0 301 0 49
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 149 0 0 772 793 116
Stage 1 - - - - - - 644 644 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 128 149 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1432 - 0 368 321 936
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 523 468 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 898 774 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1432 - - ~ 300 0 936
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 300 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 523 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 733 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 5.6 101.3

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1432 - 332
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.184 - 1.056
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.1 - 101.3
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.7 - 12.7
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 96 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
15: SR 1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 296 0 0 304 253 39 0 331 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 27 296 0 0 304 253 39 0 331 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 10 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 225 - - - - 120 - - 25 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 28 302 0 0 310 258 40 0 338 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 570 0 - - - 0 797 928 302
Stage 1 - - - - - - 358 358 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 439 570 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 - 0 0 - - 356 268 738
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 707 628 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 650 505 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 - - - - - 346 0 738
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 346 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 687 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 650 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 14.2

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 346 738 1002 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.115 0.458 0.027 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.8 13.9 8.7 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 2.4 0.1 - - -
97 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
16: Salinas Ave/Driveway & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 770 8 8 678 0 3 0 10 0 0 5
Future Vol, veh/h 1 770 8 8 678 0 3 0 10 0 0 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 150 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 802 8 8 706 0 3 0 10 0 0 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 706 0 0 811 0 0 1174 1527 402 1125 1535 353 Stage 1 - - - - - - 805 805 - 722 722 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 369 722 - 403 813 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 888 - - 811 - 0 147 116 598 160 115 643 Stage 1 - - - - - 0 342 393 - 384 429 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 0 623 429 - 595 390 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 888 - - 810 - - 144 114 597 156 114 643 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 144 114 - 156 114 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 341 392 - 383 425 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 612 425 - 583 389 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 15.8 10.6

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 346 888 - - 810 - 643
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 0.001 - - 0.01 - 0.008
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.8 9.1 - - 9.5 - 10.6
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - 0
98 Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
18: Driveway/Cardoza Ave & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 498 15 17 480 79 10 1 11 58 1 66 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 498 15 17 480 79 10 1 11 58 1 66 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 105 503 15 17 485 80 10 1 11 59 1 67 Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 188 1753 772 46 773 646 212 54 128 425 4 259 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.49 0.49 0.03 0.41 0.41 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1566 1781 1870 1562 451 323 773 1400 23 1561 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 105 503 15 17 485 80 22 0 0 59 0 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1566 1781 1870 1562 1546 0 0 1400 0 1584 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 3.2 0.2 0.4 7.8 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 3.2 0.2 0.4 7.8 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 1.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.50 1.00 0.99
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 188 1753 772 46 773 646 394 0 0 425 0 263 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.29 0.02 0.37 0.63 0.12 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 888 6622 2918 374 2945 2460 1651 0 0 1626 0 1621 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.2 5.7 4.9 18.3 8.8 6.9 13.4 0.0 0.0 13.8 0.0 13.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.1 0.0 4.8 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.8 5.8 5.0 23.1 9.7 7.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 13.9 0.0 14.4 LnGrp LOS B A A C A A B A A B A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 623 582 22 127
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 9.7 13.5 14.2
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 5.0 22.8 10.3 8.0 19.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.0 8.0 71.0 39.0 19.0 60.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 2.4 5.2 3.4 4.1 9.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 3.9 0.6 0.2 3.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.4
HCM 6th LOS A
99 100
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
4: Highway 1 SB Ramp & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 865 0 0 0 318 1
Future Volume (vph) 865 0 0 0 318 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 0.95
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1774
Flt Permitted 0.95 0.95
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1774
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 940 0 0 0 346 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 940 0 0 0 0 347
Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 8 1 6
Permitted Phases 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 52.6 23.7
Effective Green, g (s) 52.6 23.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.28
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1104 498
v/s Ratio Prot c0.53
v/s Ratio Perm 0.20
v/c Ratio 0.85 0.70
Uniform Delay, d1 12.7 27.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 6.5 4.2
Delay (s) 19.2 31.3
Level of Service B C
Approach Delay (s) 19.2 0.0 31.3
Approach LOS B A C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 84.3 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
101
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
8: 4th St & Inter-Garrison Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 240 41 75 139 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 240 41 75 139 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hourly flow rate (vph) 267 46 83 154 0 0
Pedestrians 19 5 21
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 2 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 334 650 316
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 334 650 316
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 93 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1225 397 721
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 313 237
Volume Left 0 83
Volume Right 46 0
cSH 1700 1225
Volume to Capacity 0.18 0.07
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 5
Control Delay (s) 0.0 3.2
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 3.2
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
102
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Existing 2023 Conditions
17: Imjin Rd & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1009 60 54 747 128 80
Future Volume (vph) 1009 60 54 747 128 80
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3509 1770 3539 3399 1441
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 3509 1770 3539 3399 1441
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adj. Flow (vph) 1085 65 58 803 138 86
RTOR Reduction (vph) 3 0 0 0 8 57
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1147 0 58 803 146 13
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Turn Type NA Prot NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 32.2 4.7 41.4 12.0 12.0
Effective Green, g (s) 32.2 4.7 41.4 12.0 12.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.08 0.66 0.19 0.19
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1810 133 2347 653 277
v/s Ratio Prot c0.33 0.03 c0.23
v/s Ratio Perm c0.04 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.63 0.44 0.34 0.22 0.05
Uniform Delay, d1 10.9 27.6 4.6 21.3 20.5
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 2.3 0.1 0.2 0.1
Delay (s) 11.6 29.9 4.7 21.4 20.6
Level of Service B C A C C
Approach Delay (s) 11.6 6.4 21.2
Approach LOS B A C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 62.4 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
103

MOVEMENT SUMMAR
Y
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Existing 2023 PM)] Output produced by SIDRA

INTERSECTION V
ersion: 9.1.1.200
New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
V
ehicle Movement Performance
Demand Flows
Arrival Flows
95% Back Of Queue
Mov
ID
T
urn
Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
A
ver
.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Ef
f.

Stop Rate
A
ver
.

No. of
Cycles
A
ver
.

Speed
[
T
otal
HV ]
[
T
otal
HV ]
[ V
eh.

Dist ]
veh/h
%
veh/h
%
v/c
sec
veh
ft
mph
South: Del Monte Blvd
3 L2
All MCs
173

2.0 173

2.0 0.418

7.6 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.49 0.28

0.49 30.9
8 T1
All MCs
230

2.0 230

2.0 0.418

7.6 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.4
18 R2
All MCs
57 2.0
57 2.0

0.418

7.6 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.2
Approach
460

2.0 460

2.0 0.418

7.6 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.49 0.28

0.49 31.2
East: Beach Rd
1 L2
All MCs
21 2.0
21 2.0

0.157

6.0 LOS
A

0.7 16.7

0.54 0.43

0.54 32.0
6 T1
All MCs
68 2.0
68 2.0

0.157

6.0 LOS
A

0.7 16.7

0.54 0.43

0.54 32.6
16 R2
All MCs
40 2.0
40 2.0

0.157

6.0 LOS
A

0.7 16.7

0.54 0.43

0.54 32.4
Approach
129

2.0 129

2.0 0.157

6.0 LOS
A

0.7 16.7

0.54 0.43

0.54 32.5
North: Del Monte Blvd
7 L2
All MCs
44 2.0
44 2.0

0.263

6.0 LOS
A

1.3 32.9

0.47 0.30

0.47 32.0
4 T1
All MCs
167

2.0 167

2.0 0.263

6.0 LOS
A

1.3 32.9

0.47 0.30

0.47 32.6
14 R2
All MCs
59 2.0
59 2.0

0.263

6.0 LOS
A

1.3 32.9

0.47 0.30

0.47 32.3
Approach
270

2.0 270

2.0 0.263

6.0 LOS
A

1.3 32.9

0.47 0.30

0.47 32.4
W
est: Beach Rd
5 L2
All MCs
67 2.0
67 2.0

0.280

6.1 LOS
A

1.4 36.1

0.45 0.27

0.45 31.9
2 T1
All MCs
85 2.0
85 2.0

0.280

6.1 LOS
A

1.4 36.1

0.45 0.27

0.45 32.4
12 R2
All MCs
145

2.0 145

2.0 0.280

6.1 LOS
A

1.4 36.1

0.45 0.27

0.45 32.2
Approach
297

2.0 297

2.0 0.280

6.1 LOS
A

1.4 36.1

0.45 0.27

0.45 32.2
All V
ehicles
1 156

2.0 1
156

2.0 0.418

6.6 LOS
A

2.5 64.1

0.48 0.30

0.48 31.9
104

SITE LA
YOUT
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Existing 2023 PM)] New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data.

They are not design drawin
gs.

ASSOCIA

TES INC
|
Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2
|
Created:

T
uesday
, May 14,
2024 4:30:46 PM
Project:
\\kimley
-
horn.com\ca_pls1\Project\SJC_TPT
O\City of Marina\097789003
-
Marina DIF\2023
Update\05 Design &
Analys
is\Sidra\Marina DIF 2023.
sip9
105
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 1: 2nd Ave & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 129.9
Intersection LOS F
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 15 161 95 180 939
Future Vol, veh/h 12 15 161 95 180 939
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 13 16 173 102 194 1010
Number of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approach WB NB SB
Opposing Approach SB NB
Opposing Lanes 0 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left NB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 0 2
Conflicting Approach Right SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 0
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.3 9.9 160.2

HCM LOS B A F
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 161 95 12 15 180 939
LT Vol 0 0 12 0 180 0
Through Vol 161 0 0 0 0 939
RT Vol 0 95 0 15 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 173 102 13 16 194 1010
Geometry Grp 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.263 0.136 0.027 0.028 0.289 1.366
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.804 5.098 8.119 6.896 5.373 4.872 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 623 708 444 522 672 747
Service Time 3.504 2.798 5.819 4.596 3.089 2.587
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.278 0.144 0.029 0.031 0.289 1.352
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.6 8.6 11 9.8 10.3 188.9
HCM Lane LOS B A B A B F
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 1.2 42.6
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 106
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh42.1
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 8 0 1 36 24 0 19 9 608 11 527
Future Vol, veh/h 97 8 0 1 36 24 0 19 9 608 11 527
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 104 9 0 1 39 26 0 20 10 654 12 567
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh12.5 10.8 9.4 47.3

HCM LOS B B A E
Lane NBLn1EBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 98% 0%
Vol Thru, % 68% 0% 100% 0% 60% 2% 0%
Vol Right, % 32% 0% 0% 0% 40% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 28 97 8 1 60 619 527
LT Vol 0 97 0 1 0 608 0
Through Vol 19 0 8 0 36 11 0
RT Vol 9 0 0 0 24 0 527
Lane Flow Rate 30 104 9 1 65 666 567
Geometry Grp 4b 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.05 0.222 0.017 0.002 0.125 1.049 0.705 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.054 7.78 7.271 7.885 7.088 5.674 4.478 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 595 464 495 457 509 639 799
Service Time 4.054 5.48 4.971 5.585 4.788 3.446 2.249
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.05 0.224 0.018 0.002 0.128 1.042 0.71 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.4 12.7 10.1 10.6 10.8 72.7 17.4 HCM Lane LOS A B B B B F C
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.8 0.1 0 0.4 17.7 6
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 107
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 206 17 0 0 8 12 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 206 17 0 0 8 12 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 4 268 22 0 0 10 16 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1 0 0 288 299 1
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1 1 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 287 298 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1622 - - 702 613 1084
Stage 1 0 - - - - - 1022 895 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - - 762 667 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1622 - - 700 0 1084
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 700 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1022 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 760 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0.1 8.4

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1084 - - 1622 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 - - 7.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0 - - 0 - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 108
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 126 828 0 2 1638 54 0 0 0 197 0 439 Future Volume (veh/h) 126 828 0 2 1638 54 0 0 0 197 0 439 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 134 881 0 2 1743 57 0 0 0 210 0 467 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 162 1496 0 6 1172 38 0 885 0 260 5 499
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.47 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 1781 3512 114 0 1870 0 464 10 1055 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 134 881 0 2 878 922 0 0 0 677 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 1850 0 1870 0 1529 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.6 22.3 0.0 0.1 39.0 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.8 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.6 22.3 0.0 0.1 39.0 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.69
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 162 1496 0 6 593 617 0 885 0 764 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.59 0.00 0.35 1.48 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 213 1496 0 91 593 617 0 1040 0 890 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.3 26.0 0.0 58.1 39.0 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.3 0.6 0.0 32.5 225.8 230.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 9.4 0.0 0.1 53.9 56.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 70.5 26.7 0.0 90.6 264.7 269.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E C F F F D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1015 1802 0 677
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.4 267.0 0.0 38.8
Approach LOS C F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 59.3 4.4 53.2 59.3 14.6 43.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 6.0 47.0 65.0 14.0 39.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 2.1 24.3 50.9 10.6 41.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 6.6 4.4 0.1 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 154.7
HCM 6th LOS F
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 109
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh26.3
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 25 137 162 56 29 50 177 34 13 372 24 Future Vol, veh/h 32 25 137 162 56 29 50 177 34 13 372 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 37 29 159 188 65 34 58 206 40 15 433 28
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh15.8 20.2 19.7 39.3

HCM LOS C C C E
Lane NBLn1EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1
Vol Left, % 19% 16% 66% 3%
Vol Thru, % 68% 13% 23% 91%
Vol Right, % 13% 71% 12% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 261 194 247 409
LT Vol 50 32 162 13
Through Vol 177 25 56 372
RT Vol 34 137 29 24
Lane Flow Rate 303 226 287 476
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.59 0.446 0.584 0.871
Departure Headway (Hd) 7 7.116 7.317 6.592
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 513 505 491 547
Service Time 5.067 5.186 5.382 4.648
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.591 0.448 0.585 0.87
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 19.7 15.8 20.2 39.3
HCM Lane LOS C C C E
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.8 2.3 3.7 9.6
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 110
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 947 560 500 1267 0 206 0 133 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 947 560 500 1267 0 206 0 133 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 986 583 521 1320 0 215 0 139 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 3 1719 766 675 2624 0 315 268 225 3 5 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.20 0.74 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1583 3456 3647 0 3456 1870 1575 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 986 583 521 1320 0 215 0 139 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1583 1728 1777 0 1728 1870 1575 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 13.4 20.3 9.6 10.4 0.0 4.1 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 13.4 20.3 9.6 10.4 0.0 4.1 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1719 766 675 2624 0 315 268 225 3 5 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.57 0.76 0.77 0.50 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 158 2316 1032 1177 3211 0 461 1136 957 158 2001 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 12.4 14.2 25.7 3.7 0.0 29.7 0.0 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.3 2.3 1.9 0.1 0.0 2.6 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 4.7 6.8 3.9 2.2 0.0 1.7 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 12.8 16.6 27.6 3.8 0.0 32.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B C A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1569 1841 354 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.2 10.6 31.4 0.0
Approach LOS B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s0.0 13.7 17.2 36.7 10.2 3.5 0.0 53.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s6.0 41.0 23.0 44.0 9.0 38.0 6.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 7.6 11.6 22.3 6.1 0.0 0.0 12.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.4 1.5 10.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 14.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 14.0
HCM 6th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 111
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 237 106 224 166 232 146 268 206 579 595 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 30 237 106 224 166 232 146 268 206 579 595 21 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 34 272 122 257 191 267 168 308 237 666 684 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 44 360 169 754 408 339 211 390 573 756 1083 38 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.12 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 272 2211 1037 3456 1870 1552 1781 1870 2743 3456 3501 123 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 232 0 196 257 191 267 168 308 237 666 347 361 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1857 0 1663 1728 1870 1552 1781 1870 1371 1728 1777 1847 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.0 0.0 9.3 5.2 7.4 13.6 7.7 13.0 6.3 15.6 14.0 14.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.0 0.0 9.3 5.2 7.4 13.6 7.7 13.0 6.3 15.6 14.0 14.0 Prop In Lane 0.15 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 302 0 271 754 408 339 211 390 573 756 550 571 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.00 0.72 0.34 0.47 0.79 0.80 0.79 0.41 0.88 0.63 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 444 0 398 1240 671 557 639 671 984 827 850 884 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh33.5 0.0 33.2 27.6 28.4 30.8 35.9 31.3 28.6 31.6 24.8 24.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.8 0.0 3.6 0.3 0.8 4.1 6.8 3.6 0.5 10.2 1.2 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.8 0.0 3.9 2.1 3.3 5.3 3.6 6.0 2.0 7.3 5.8 6.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 38.3 0.0 36.9 27.9 29.3 34.9 42.6 34.9 29.1 41.8 26.0 25.9 LnGrp LOS D D C C C D C C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 428 715 713 1374
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.6 30.9 34.8 33.7
Approach LOS D C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s22.3 21.4 17.6 13.9 29.9 22.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s17.6 15.0 12.0 9.7 16.0 15.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 2.4 1.6 0.4 4.4 2.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 33.8
HCM 6th LOS C
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 112
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1156 251 1788 127 27 1502
Future Volume (veh/h) 1156 251 1788 127 27 1502
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1257 273 1943 138 29 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1287 3066 843 715 203
Arrive On Green 0.37 0.86 0.45 0.45 0.06 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1257 273 1943 138 29 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 36.6 1.2 46.0 5.3 0.8 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 36.6 1.2 46.0 5.3 0.8 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h1287 3066 843 715 203
V/C Ratio(X) 0.98 0.09 2.30 0.19 0.14
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1287 3066 843 715 1152
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh31.6 1.0 28.0 16.8 45.6 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 19.6 0.0 590.3 0.1 0.3 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln18.2 0.1 157.8 1.9 0.4 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 51.1 1.1 618.3 17.0 45.9 0.0
LnGrp LOS D A F B D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1530 2081 29
Approach Delay, s/veh 42.2 578.4 45.9
Approach LOS D F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 92.0 10.0 42.0 50.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 38.0 46.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 2.8 38.6 48.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 348.8
HCM 6th LOS F
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 113
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 127 145 27 57 620
Future Vol, veh/h 61 127 145 27 57 620
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 1 0 2 2 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 115 0 - 80 75 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 67 140 159 30 63 681
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 970 162 0 0 191 0
Stage 1 161 - - - - -
Stage 2 809 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 281 883 - - 1383 -
Stage 1 868 - - - - -
Stage 2 438 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 267 880 - - 1380 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 267 - - - - -
Stage 1 866 - - - - -
Stage 2 417 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v14.1 0 0.7

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 267 880 1380 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.251 0.159 0.045 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 22.9 9.9 7.7 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 1 0.6 0.1 -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 114
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 130.4
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 9 18 175 12 58 4 98 10 22 730 0
Future Vol, veh/h 6 9 18 175 12 58 4 98 10 22 730 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 10 21 203 14 67 5 114 12 26 849 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.9 16.3 11.5 190.6

HCM LOS B C B F
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 18% 71% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 91% 27% 5% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 9% 55% 24% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 4 108 33 245 22 730
LT Vol 4 0 6 175 22 0
Through Vol 0 98 9 12 0 730
RT Vol 0 10 18 58 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 5 126 38 285 26 849
Geometry Grp 5 5 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.009 0.224 0.07 0.486 0.045 1.374
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.459 6.879 7.386 6.909 6.335 5.828 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 483 525 488 524 568 628
Service Time 5.159 4.579 5.386 4.909 4.042 3.535
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 0.24 0.078 0.544 0.046 1.352
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.2 11.6 10.9 16.3 9.3 196.1
HCM Lane LOS B B B C A F
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.9 0.2 2.6 0.1 37.4
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 115
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 43.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 45 28 319 41 0 0 0 0 184 43 16
Future Vol, veh/h 0 45 28 319 41 0 0 0 0 184 43 16
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 250 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 52 32 367 47 0 0 0 0 211 49 18
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 84 0 0 851 865 47
Stage 1 - - - - - - 781 781 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 70 84 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1513 - 0 330 292 1022
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 451 405 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 953 825 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1513 - - 250 0 1022
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 250 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 451 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 721 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 7.2 110.6

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1513 - 266
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.242 - 1.05
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 8.1 - 110.6
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 1 - 11.1
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 116
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 15: SR 1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 73 180 0 0 289 340 57 0 156 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 73 180 0 0 289 340 57 0 156 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 4 4 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 225 - - - - 120 - - 25 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 78 194 0 0 311 366 61 0 168 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 682 0 - - - 0 845 1032 194
Stage 1 - - - - - - 350 350 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 495 682 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 911 - 0 0 - - 333 233 847
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 713 633 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 613 450 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 911 - - - - - 304 0 847
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 304 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 652 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 612 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.7 0 12.8

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 304 847 911 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.202 0.198 0.086 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 19.8 10.3 9.3 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.7 0.7 0.3 - - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 117
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 16: Salinas Ave/Driveway & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 971 11 25 795 0 3 0 20 0 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 971 11 25 795 0 3 0 20 0 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 150 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 1142 13 29 935 0 4 0 24 0 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 935 0 0 1157 0 0 1672 2139 573 1566 2152 468 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1146 1146 - 993 993 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 526 993 - 573 1159 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 728 - - 600 - 0 63 48 463 75 47 542
Stage 1 - - - - - 0 212 272 - 263 322 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 0 503 322 - 472 268 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 728 - - 599 - - 60 45 462 68 44 542
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 60 45 - 68 44 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 211 270 - 262 307 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 478 307 - 446 266 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0.3 21.4 11.7

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 247 728 - - 599 - 542
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.11 0.002 - - 0.049 - 0.002
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 21.4 10 - - 11.3 - 11.7
HCM Lane LOS C A - - B - B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.4 0 - - 0.2 - 0
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 118
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 18: Driveway/Cardoza Ave & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 39 289 7 6 432 23 7 0 19 77 0 159 Future Volume (veh/h) 39 289 7 6 432 23 7 0 19 77 0 159 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 41 307 7 6 460 24 7 0 20 82 0 169
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 101 1507 656 17 705 595 172 48 247 513 0 337 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.38 0.38 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1546 1781 1870 1579 181 222 1154 1387 0 1574 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 41 307 7 6 460 24 27 0 0 82 0 169
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1546 1781 1870 1579 1558 0 0 1387 0 1574 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 1.9 0.1 0.1 6.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 1.9 0.1 0.1 6.9 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 3.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.74 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 101 1507 656 17 705 595 466 0 0 513 0 337 V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.20 0.01 0.35 0.65 0.04 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 680 7304 3179 471 3625 3059 1829 0 0 1804 0 1802 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.5 6.2 5.7 16.8 8.8 6.7 10.7 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 11.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.1 0.0 11.5 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 2.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.1 6.2 5.7 28.2 9.8 6.7 10.8 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 13.0 LnGrp LOS B A A C A A B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 355 490 27 251
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.6 9.9 10.8 12.4
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 4.3 18.4 11.3 5.9 16.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.0 9.0 70.0 39.0 13.0 66.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 2.1 3.9 5.2 2.8 8.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 2.3 1.4 0.0 3.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 9.7
HCM 6th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 119
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 4: Highway 1 SB Ramp & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1356 0 0 0 437 33
Future Volume (vph) 1356 0 0 0 437 33
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1780
Flt Permitted 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1780
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Adj. Flow (vph) 1524 0 0 0 491 37
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1524 0 0 0 0 528
Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 8 1 6
Permitted Phases 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 77.2 40.4
Effective Green, g (s) 77.2 40.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.32
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1087 572
v/s Ratio Prot c0.86 c0.30
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 1.40 0.92
Uniform Delay, d1 24.2 41.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 186.5 20.6
Delay (s) 210.7 61.7
Level of Service F E
Approach Delay (s/veh) 210.7 0.0 61.7
Approach LOS F A E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 172.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.24
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 125.6 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 120
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 8: 4th St & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 148 57 146 691 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 148 57 146 691 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Hourly flow rate (vph) 157 61 155 735 0 0
Pedestrians 12 2 7
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 1 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 225 1252 197
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 225 1252 197
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 88 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 1344 166 843
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 218 890
Volume Left 0 155
Volume Right 61 0
cSH 1700 1344
Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.12
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 10
Control Delay (s/veh) 0.0 2.7
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.0 2.7
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 2.2
Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 121
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 17: Imjin Rd & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 742 213 1263 1524 56 121
Future Volume (vph) 742 213 1263 1524 56 121
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91
Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3421 1770 3539 3254 1441
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 3421 1770 3539 3254 1441
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 789 227 1344 1621 60 129
RTOR Reduction (vph) 19 0 0 0 60 59
Lane Group Flow (vph) 997 0 1344 1621 65 5
Turn Type NA Prot NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 35.9 40.3 80.2 7.5 7.5
Effective Green, g (s) 35.9 40.3 80.2 7.5 7.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.42 0.84 0.08 0.08
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1283 745 2965 255 112
v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 c0.76 0.46
v/s Ratio Perm c0.02 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.78 1.80 0.55 0.26 0.04
Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 27.7 2.3 41.5 40.8
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 367.2 0.2 0.5 0.2
Delay (s) 29.4 394.9 2.5 42.0 41.0
Level of Service C F A D D
Approach Delay (s/veh) 29.4 180.4 41.6
Approach LOS C F D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 137.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.22
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.7 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 122

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Future 2045 No Improvements AM)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
Demand
Flows
Arrival
Flows
95% Back Of
Queue
Mov
ID
Turn Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Eff.

Stop
Rate
Aver.

No. of
Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Del Monte Blvd
3 L2 All MCs 165 2.0 165 2.0 0.496 8.8 LOS A 3.3 83.6 0.56 0.33 0.56 30.5 8 T1 All MCs 308 2.0 308 2.0 0.496 8.8 LOS A 3.3 83.6 0.56 0.33 0.56 31.1 18 R2 All MCs 67 2.0 67 2.0 0.496 8.8 LOS A 3.3 83.6 0.56 0.33 0.56 30.8 Approach 540 2.0 540 2.0 0.496 8.8 LOS A 3.3 83.6 0.56 0.33 0.56 30.9 East: Beach Rd
1 L2 All MCs 180 2.0 180 2.0 0.403 9.7 LOS A 2.2 55.8 0.67 0.59 0.78 29.7 6 T1 All MCs 79 2.0 79 2.0 0.403 9.7 LOS A 2.2 55.8 0.67 0.59 0.78 30.2 16 R2 All MCs 52 2.0 52 2.0 0.403 9.7 LOS A 2.2 55.8 0.67 0.59 0.78 30.0 Approach 311 2.0 311 2.0 0.403 9.7 LOS A 2.2 55.8 0.67 0.59 0.78 29.8 North: Del Monte Blvd
7 L2 All MCs 96 2.0 96 2.0 1.367 184.4 LOS F 117.1 2975.0 1.00 4.39 9.57 9.1 4 T1 All MCs 998 2.0 998 2.0 1.367 184.4 LOS F 117.1 2975.0 1.00 4.39 9.57 9.1 14 R2 All MCs 87 2.0 87 2.0 1.367 184.4 LOS F 117.1 2975.0 1.00 4.39 9.57 9.1 Approach 1181 2.0 1181 2.0 1.367 184.4 LOS F 117.1 2975.0 1.00 4.39 9.57 9.1 West: Beach Rd
5 L2 All MCs 62 2.0 62 2.0 0.824 37.5 LOS E 6.8 171.5 0.91 1.20 1.90 22.1 2 T1 All MCs 81 2.0 81 2.0 0.824 37.5 LOS E 6.8 171.5 0.91 1.20 1.90 22.4 12 R2 All MCs 249 2.0 249 2.0 0.824 37.5 LOS E 6.8 171.5 0.91 1.20 1.90 22.2 Approach 393 2.0 393 2.0 0.824 37.5 LOS E 6.8 171.5 0.91 1.20 1.90 22.2 All Vehicles 2425 2.0 2425 2.0 1.367 99.1 LOS F 117.1 2975.0 0.85 2.48 5.20 13.9 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Const raint
effects.

HCM LOS A B B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 259 27 63 101 73 294
LT Vol 0 0 63 0 73 0
Through Vol 259 0 0 0 0 294
RT Vol 0 27 0 101 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 264 28 64 103 74 300
Geometry Grp 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.396 0.036 0.118 0.155 0.12 0.441
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.388 4.682 6.628 5.416 5.794 5.29 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 663 757 537 655 615 675
Service Time 3.162 2.455 4.418 3.205 3.565 3.06
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.398 0.037 0.119 0.157 0.12 0.444
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 11.7 7.6 10.3 9.2 9.4 12.2
HCM Lane LOS B A B A A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.9 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.4 2.3
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 124
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh17.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 144 44 0 0 486 0 130 0 10 9 80
Future Vol, veh/h 0 144 44 0 0 486 0 130 0 10 9 80
Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 166 51 0 0 559 0 149 0 11 10 92
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh11.9 22.9 12.6 10.1

HCM LOS B C B B
Lane NBLn1EBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2SBLn1SBLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 53% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 100% 77% 100% 0% 47% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 23% 0% 100% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 130 0 188 0 486 19 80
LT Vol 0 0 0 0 0 10 0
Through Vol 130 0 144 0 0 9 0
RT Vol 0 0 44 0 486 0 80
Lane Flow Rate 149 0 216 0 559 22 92
Geometry Grp 4b 5 5 5 5 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.284 0 0.355 0 0.776 0.044 0.158
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.832 6.078 5.912 5.709 5.002 7.172 6.188 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 524 0 605 0 721 497 577
Service Time 4.9 3.839 3.672 3.456 2.748 4.944 3.959
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.284 0 0.357 0 0.775 0.044 0.159
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 12.6 8.8 11.9 8.5 22.9 10.3 10.1 HCM Lane LOS B N B N C B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.2 0 1.6 0 7.5 0.1 0.6
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 125
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 0 0 12 0 1 0 9 0 21 4 9
Future Vol, veh/h 7 0 0 12 0 1 0 9 0 21 4 9
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 9 0 0 16 0 1 0 12 0 28 5 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 1 0 0 0 0 0 52 51 0
Stage 1 - - - - - - 18 18 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 34 33 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1622 - - - - - 957 840 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1005 880 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 988 868 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1622 - - - - - 950 0 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 950 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 999 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 987 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 7.2

HCM LOS -
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 1622 - - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - 7.2 - - - - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - - - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - 0 - - - - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 126
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 324 1867 0 13 1268 62 0 0 0 30 0 223 Future Volume (veh/h) 324 1867 0 13 1268 62 0 0 0 30 0 223 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 331 1905 0 13 1294 63 0 0 0 31 0 228 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 375 2326 0 33 1594 77 0 373 0 67 14 277
Arrive On Green 0.21 0.65 0.00 0.02 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3647 0 1781 3449 168 0 1870 0 119 70 1390 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 331 1905 0 13 666 691 0 0 0 259 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 1840 0 1870 0 1579 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.9 37.5 0.0 0.7 30.3 30.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.9 37.5 0.0 0.7 30.3 30.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.88
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 375 2326 0 33 821 850 0 373 0 358 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.82 0.00 0.40 0.81 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 645 2801 0 114 871 901 0 757 0 678 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.9 12.1 0.0 45.6 21.7 21.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.4 1.7 0.0 7.6 5.6 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.0 13.1 0.0 0.4 13.1 13.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 43.3 13.8 0.0 53.2 27.3 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.7 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D C C D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2236 1370 0 259
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.2 27.5 0.0 38.7
Approach LOS B C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.7 5.7 65.4 22.7 23.8 47.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.0 6.0 74.0 38.0 34.0 46.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 2.7 39.5 16.7 18.9 32.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 22.0 1.6 0.9 7.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 22.9
HCM 6th LOS C
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 127
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 5
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 12
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 44 36 58 21 28 60 183 126 40 162 40 Future Vol, veh/h 32 44 36 58 21 28 60 183 126 40 162 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 35 48 40 64 23 31 66 201 138 44 178 44
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh10.1 10.2 13.6 11.3

HCM LOS B B B B
Lane NBLn1EBLn1WBLn1SBLn1
Vol Left, % 16% 29% 54% 17%
Vol Thru, % 50% 39% 20% 67%
Vol Right, % 34% 32% 26% 17%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 369 112 107 242
LT Vol 60 32 58 40
Through Vol 183 44 21 162
RT Vol 126 36 28 40
Lane Flow Rate 405 123 118 266
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.546 0.195 0.189 0.379
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.85 5.694 5.792 5.127
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 742 629 618 702
Service Time 2.88 3.738 3.835 3.16
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.546 0.196 0.191 0.379
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 13.6 10.1 10.2 11.3
HCM Lane LOS B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.3 0.7 0.7 1.8
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 128
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1810 457 343 1217 0 419 0 407 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1810 457 343 1217 0 419 0 407 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1885 476 357 1268 0 436 0 424 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 2 1669 743 380 2202 0 519 562 474 2 393 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.11 0.62 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1582 3456 3647 0 3456 1870 1579 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1885 476 357 1268 0 436 0 424 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1582 1728 1777 0 1728 1870 1579 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 47.0 22.8 10.3 21.1 0.0 12.3 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 47.0 22.8 10.3 21.1 0.0 12.3 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 2 1669 743 380 2202 0 519 562 474 2 393 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 1.13 0.64 0.94 0.58 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 107 1669 743 380 2202 0 656 935 789 107 1314 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 26.5 20.1 44.2 11.3 0.0 41.4 0.0 33.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 66.5 1.9 31.2 0.4 0.0 7.8 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 34.1 8.4 6.0 7.7 0.0 5.7 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 93.0 22.0 75.4 11.6 0.0 49.2 0.0 41.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS F C E B D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2361 1625 860 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 78.7 25.6 45.2 0.0
Approach LOS E C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s0.0 34.1 15.0 51.0 19.0 15.1 0.0 66.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s6.0 50.0 11.0 47.0 19.0 37.0 6.0 52.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 27.7 12.3 49.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 23.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 11.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 54.9
HCM 6th LOS D
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 129
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 41 231 162 385 295 355 155 393 460 289 248 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 41 231 162 385 295 355 155 393 460 289 248 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 243 171 405 311 374 163 414 484 304 261 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 53 301 221 977 529 432 202 493 706 397 927 32 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 315 1795 1320 3456 1870 1529 1781 1870 2679 3456 3500 120 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 253 0 204 405 311 374 163 414 484 304 132 138 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1855 0 1575 1728 1870 1529 1781 1870 1339 1728 1777 1843 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.3 0.0 11.6 8.9 13.4 21.7 8.3 19.5 15.2 8.0 5.5 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.3 0.0 11.6 8.9 13.4 21.7 8.3 19.5 15.2 8.0 5.5 5.6 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 311 0 264 977 529 432 202 493 706 397 471 488 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.77 0.41 0.59 0.87 0.81 0.84 0.69 0.77 0.28 0.28 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 397 0 337 1110 601 491 572 601 861 740 761 790 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh37.4 0.0 37.2 27.2 28.8 31.8 40.4 32.5 30.9 40.1 27.2 27.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.7 0.0 8.2 0.3 1.2 13.6 7.5 8.8 1.7 3.1 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln6.3 0.0 5.0 3.6 6.0 9.4 4.0 9.7 4.9 3.5 2.3 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 47.2 0.0 45.3 27.5 30.0 45.4 47.9 41.3 32.6 43.2 27.6 27.6 LnGrp LOS D D C C D D D C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 457 1090 1061 574
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.4 34.4 38.3 35.9
Approach LOS D C D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s14.7 28.6 19.7 14.6 28.7 30.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s10.0 21.5 14.3 10.3 7.6 23.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 3.1 1.4 0.4 1.5 2.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 37.7
HCM 6th LOS D
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 130
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1200 1431 761 55 86 1129
Future Volume (veh/h) 1200 1431 761 55 86 1129
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1263 1506 801 58 91 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1352 3057 803 680 207
Arrive On Green 0.39 0.86 0.43 0.43 0.06 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1263 1506 801 58 91 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 35.1 10.3 42.8 2.2 2.5 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 35.1 10.3 42.8 2.2 2.5 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h1352 3057 803 680 207
V/C Ratio(X) 0.93 0.49 1.00 0.09 0.44
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1414 3121 803 680 1173
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh29.3 1.7 28.6 16.9 45.5 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.4 0.1 31.2 0.1 1.5 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln16.2 1.3 25.2 0.8 1.1 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 40.6 1.8 59.8 17.0 46.9 0.0
LnGrp LOS D A E B D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2769 859 91
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.5 56.9 46.9
Approach LOS B E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 90.2 10.0 43.2 47.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 41.0 43.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 4.5 37.1 44.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 19.9 0.3 2.1 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 28.8
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 131
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 9
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 59 332 56 62 199
Future Vol, veh/h 46 59 332 56 62 199
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 1 0 3 3 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 115 0 - 80 75 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 49 63 353 60 66 212
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 703 357 0 0 416 0
Stage 1 356 - - - - -
Stage 2 347 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 404 687 - - 1143 -
Stage 1 709 - - - - -
Stage 2 716 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 378 684 - - 1140 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 378 - - - - -
Stage 1 707 - - - - -
Stage 2 672 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 13 0 2

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 378 684 1140 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.129 0.092 0.058 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 15.9 10.8 8.4 -
HCM Lane LOS - - C B A -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.4 0.3 0.2 -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 132
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th AWSC Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 25.6
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 12 10 33 15 131 18 439 23 12 116 10 Future Vol, veh/h 13 12 10 33 15 131 18 439 23 12 116 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 16 15 13 41 19 164 23 549 29 15 145 13
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.1 11.9 36.1 10.9

HCM LOS B B E B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 100% 0% 37% 18% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 95% 34% 8% 0% 92%
Vol Right, % 0% 5% 29% 73% 0% 8%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 18 462 35 179 12 126
LT Vol 18 0 13 33 12 0
Through Vol 0 439 12 15 0 116
RT Vol 0 23 10 131 0 10
Lane Flow Rate 23 578 44 224 15 158
Geometry Grp 5 5 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.038 0.891 0.078 0.354 0.028 0.265
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.098 5.557 6.438 5.699 6.626 6.061 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 588 653 553 629 540 592
Service Time 3.829 3.288 4.51 3.753 4.374 3.808
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 0.885 0.08 0.356 0.028 0.267
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.1 37.1 10.1 11.9 9.6 11
HCM Lane LOS A E B B A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 10.9 0.3 1.6 0.1 1.1
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 133
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 11
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 298.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 103 32 231 95 0 0 0 0 457 0 55
Future Vol, veh/h 0 103 32 231 95 0 0 0 0 457 0 55
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - 250 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 127 40 285 117 0 0 0 0 564 0 68
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 168 0 0 835 855 117
Stage 1 - - - - - - 687 687 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 148 168 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1410 - 0 ~ 338 296 935
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 ~ 499 447 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 880 759 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1410 - - ~ 270 0 935
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 270 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - ~ 499 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 702 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 5.8 $ 563.4

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1410 - 292
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.202 - 2.165
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 8.2 -$ 563.4
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0.8 - 47.5
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 134
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 15: SR 1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 12
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 67 485 0 0 337 387 44 0 326 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 67 485 0 0 337 387 44 0 326 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 10 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 225 - - - - 120 - - 25 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 68 495 0 0 344 395 45 0 333 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 741 0 - - - 0 1173 1372 495
Stage 1 - - - - - - 631 631 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 542 741 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 866 - 0 0 - - 212 146 575
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 530 474 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 583 423 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 866 - - - - - 195 0 575
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 195 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 488 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 583 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 1.2 0 20.6

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 195 575 866 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.23 0.579 0.079 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 28.9 19.5 9.5 - - -
HCM Lane LOS D C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.9 3.7 0.3 - - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 135
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 16: Salinas Ave/Driveway & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th TWSC Page 13
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 808 13 20 999 0 8 0 27 0 0 5
Future Vol, veh/h 1 808 13 20 999 0 8 0 27 0 0 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 150 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 842 14 21 1041 0 8 0 28 0 0 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1041 0 0 857 0 0 1408 1928 422 1506 1942 521 Stage 1 - - - - - - 845 845 - 1083 1083 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 563 1083 - 423 859 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 664 - - 779 - 0 99 66 580 83 64 500
Stage 1 - - - - - 0 324 377 - 232 292 -
Stage 2 - - - - - 0 478 292 - 579 371 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 664 - - 778 - - 96 64 579 77 62 500
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 96 64 - 77 62 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 323 375 - 231 284 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 460 284 - 549 370 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0.2 20.5 12.3

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 269 664 - - 778 - 500
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.136 0.002 - - 0.027 - 0.01
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 20.5 10.4 - - 9.8 - 12.3
HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) 0.5 0 - - 0.1 - 0
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 136
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 18: Driveway/Cardoza Ave & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 102 646 17 16 646 81 10 1 11 58 1 67 Future Volume (veh/h) 102 646 17 16 646 81 10 1 11 58 1 67 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 103 653 17 16 653 82 10 1 11 59 1 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 174 1985 876 43 907 759 184 46 112 370 3 226 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.56 0.56 0.02 0.49 0.49 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1568 1781 1870 1565 451 321 773 1400 23 1560 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 653 17 16 653 82 22 0 0 59 0 69 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1568 1781 1870 1565 1545 0 0 1400 0 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 4.4 0.2 0.4 12.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 4.4 0.2 0.4 12.2 1.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.50 1.00 0.99
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 174 1985 876 43 907 759 343 0 0 370 0 229 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.33 0.02 0.37 0.72 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 769 5731 2529 324 2549 2133 1428 0 0 1408 0 1402 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.0 5.3 4.3 21.1 9.0 6.2 16.3 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.1 0.0 5.2 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 3.7 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 22.2 5.4 4.3 26.4 10.1 6.2 16.4 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 17.6 LnGrp LOS C A A C B A B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 773 751 22 128
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.6 10.0 16.4 17.3
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 5.1 28.6 10.4 8.3 25.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.0 8.0 71.0 39.0 19.0 60.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.5 2.4 6.4 3.7 4.4 14.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 5.4 0.6 0.2 5.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 9.5
HCM 6th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 137
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 4: Highway 1 SB Ramp & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1222 0 0 0 318 1
Future Volume (vph) 1222 0 0 0 318 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 0.95
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1774
Flt Permitted 0.95 0.95
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1774
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 1328 0 0 0 346 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1328 0 0 0 0 347
Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 8 1 6
Permitted Phases 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 85.2 28.2
Effective Green, g (s) 85.2 28.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.23
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1242 412
v/s Ratio Prot c0.75
v/s Ratio Perm 0.20
v/c Ratio 1.07 0.84
Uniform Delay, d1 18.1 44.5
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 46.2 14.4
Delay (s) 64.3 58.9
Level of Service E E
Approach Delay (s/veh) 64.3 0.0 58.9
Approach LOS E A E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 63.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 121.4 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 138
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 8: 4th St & Inter-Garrison Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 644 56 60 165 0 0
Future Volume (Veh/h) 644 56 60 165 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Hourly flow rate (vph) 716 62 67 183 0 0
Pedestrians 19 5 21
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 0.0
Walking Speed (ft/s) 3.5 3.5 3.5
Percent Blockage 2 0 0
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type None None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 799 1104 773
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol 799 1104 773
tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3
p0 queue free % 92 100 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 824 211 397
Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1
Volume Total 778 250
Volume Left 0 67
Volume Right 62 0
cSH 1700 824
Volume to Capacity 0.46 0.08
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 7
Control Delay (s/veh) 0.0 3.3
Lane LOS A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 0.0 3.3
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 139
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Future 2045 No Improvement Conditions 17: Imjin Rd & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 3
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1810 62 166 1090 187 442
Future Volume (vph) 1810 62 166 1090 187 442
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3522 1770 3539 3241 1441
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 3522 1770 3539 3241 1441
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adj. Flow (vph) 1946 67 178 1172 201 475
RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 0 0 150 150
Lane Group Flow (vph) 2011 0 178 1172 289 87
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Turn Type NA Prot NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 66.9 12.6 84.0 16.8 16.8
Effective Green, g (s) 66.9 12.6 84.0 16.8 16.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.11 0.77 0.15 0.15
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2145 203 2707 495 220
v/s Ratio Prot c0.57 c0.10 0.33
v/s Ratio Perm c0.09 0.06
v/c Ratio 0.94 0.88 0.43 0.58 0.40
Uniform Delay, d1 19.6 47.8 4.5 43.2 41.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 8.6 31.8 0.1 1.8 1.2
Delay (s) 28.1 79.6 4.6 45.0 43.1
Level of Service C E A D D
Approach Delay (s/veh) 28.1 14.5 44.3
Approach LOS C B D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 26.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 109.8 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 140

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Future 2045 No Improvements PM)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
Demand
Flows
Arrival
Flows
95% Back Of
Queue
Mov
ID
Turn Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Eff.

Stop
Rate
Aver.

No. of
Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Del Monte Blvd
3 L2 All MCs 262 2.0 262 2.0 0.727 14.4 LOS B 12.2 309.8 0.78 0.59 1.06 28.4 8 T1 All MCs 441 2.0 441 2.0 0.727 14.4 LOS B 12.2 309.8 0.78 0.59 1.06 28.8 18 R2 All MCs 105 2.0 105 2.0 0.727 14.4 LOS B 12.2 309.8 0.78 0.59 1.06 28.6 Approach 808 2.0 808 2.0 0.727 14.4 LOS B 12.2 309.8 0.78 0.59 1.06 28.6 East: Beach Rd
1 L2 All MCs 42 2.0 42 2.0 0.303 10.0 LOS B 1.3 32.6 0.69 0.64 0.71 30.2 6 T1 All MCs 78 2.0 78 2.0 0.303 10.0 LOS B 1.3 32.6 0.69 0.64 0.71 30.7 16 R2 All MCs 62 2.0 62 2.0 0.303 10.0 LOS B 1.3 32.6 0.69 0.64 0.71 30.5 Approach 182 2.0 182 2.0 0.303 10.0 LOS B 1.3 32.6 0.69 0.64 0.71 30.5 North: Del Monte Blvd
7 L2 All MCs 58 2.0 58 2.0 0.485 10.0 LOS B 3.4 85.3 0.66 0.54 0.80 30.4 4 T1 All MCs 313 2.0 313 2.0 0.485 10.0 LOS B 3.4 85.3 0.66 0.54 0.80 30.9 14 R2 All MCs 67 2.0 67 2.0 0.485 10.0 LOS B 3.4 85.3 0.66 0.54 0.80 30.7 Approach 438 2.0 438 2.0 0.485 10.0 LOS B 3.4 85.3 0.66 0.54 0.80 30.8 West: Beach Rd
5 L2 All MCs 60 2.0 60 2.0 0.343 7.9 LOS A 1.7 43.0 0.60 0.45 0.60 31.1 2 T1 All MCs 69 2.0 69 2.0 0.343 7.9 LOS A 1.7 43.0 0.60 0.45 0.60 31.6 12 R2 All MCs 171 2.0 171 2.0 0.343 7.9 LOS A 1.7 43.0 0.60 0.45 0.60 31.4 Approach 300 2.0 300 2.0 0.343 7.9 LOS A 1.7 43.0 0.60 0.45 0.60 31.4 All Vehicles 1729 2.0 1729 2.0 0.727 11.7 LOS B 12.2 309.8 0.71 0.56 0.88 29.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Const raint
effects.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000- 2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2 | Processed: Monday, June 2, 2025 3:59:31 PM Project: \\kimley- horn.com\ca_pls1\Project\SJC_TPTO\City of Marina\097789003- Marina DIF\2025 Update\05 Design & Analysis\Sidra\Marina DIF 2025_v2.sip9
141
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
1: 2nd Ave & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 12 0 15 0 161 95 180 939 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 12 0 15 0 161 95 180 939 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 13 0 16 0 173 102 194 1010 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 6 39 33 76 0 301 6 598 332 277 1978 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.16 0.56 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 2178 1209 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 13 0 16 0 139 136 194 1010 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1777 1611 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.9 2.1 3.3 5.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.9 2.1 3.3 5.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 6 39 33 76 0 301 6 488 442 277 1978 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.29 0.31 0.70 0.51 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 339 1659 1406 564 0 1607 339 2533 2296 1749 7880 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.6 0.0 10.5 0.0 9.0 9.1 12.6 4.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.4 3.2 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.6 1.2 0.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 10.5 0.0 9.3 9.5 15.9 4.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 29 275 1204
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 12.8 9.4 6.4
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 12.7 5.3 4.7 0.0 21.6 0.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 45.0 10.0 28.0 6.0 70.0 6.0 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 4.1 2.2 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 2.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 7.0
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 142
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh42.1
Intersection LOS E
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 8 0 1 36 24 0 19 9 608 11 527
Future Vol, veh/h 97 8 0 1 36 24 0 19 9 608 11 527
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 104 9 0 1 39 26 0 20 10 654 12 567
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh12.5 10.8 9.4 47.3

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 143
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 206 17 0 0 8 12 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 206 17 0 0 8 12 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 4 268 22 0 0 10 16 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1 0 0 277 299 1
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1 1 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 275 297 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1621 - - 713 613 1083
Stage 1 0 - - - - - 1022 895 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - - 771 667 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1621 - - 711 0 1083
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 711 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1022 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 769 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0.1 8.36

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1083 - - 24 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 - - 7.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 144
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 126 828 0 2 1638 54 0 0 0 197 0 439 Future Volume (veh/h) 126 828 0 2 1638 54 0 0 0 197 0 439 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 134 881 0 2 1743 57 0 0 0 210 0 467 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 167 1926 859 6 1604 714 2 268 0 248 609 515
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1583 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1581 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 134 881 0 2 1743 57 0 0 0 210 0 467 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1583 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1581 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 14.1 0.0 0.1 42.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 26.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.9 14.1 0.0 0.1 42.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 26.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 167 1926 859 6 1604 714 2 268 0 248 609 515 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.46 0.00 0.35 1.09 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 306 1985 886 115 1604 714 124 723 0 383 995 841 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.3 13.0 0.0 46.3 25.5 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.1 0.0 30.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.5 0.2 0.0 32.0 50.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 8.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.4 5.3 0.0 0.1 27.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 10.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 49.8 13.1 0.0 78.3 75.6 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.2 0.0 38.6 LnGrp LOS D B E F B D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1015 1802 0 677
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.0 73.7 0.0 41.9
Approach LOS B E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 17.3 4.3 54.4 0.0 34.3 12.8 46.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.0 36.0 6.0 52.0 6.5 49.5 16.0 42.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.7 0.0 2.1 16.1 0.0 28.3 8.9 44.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 1.7 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 51.3
HCM 7th LOS D
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 145
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 32 25 137 162 56 29 50 177 34 13 372 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 32 25 137 162 56 29 50 177 34 13 372 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 37 29 159 188 65 34 58 206 40 15 433 28 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 184 109 372 480 153 58 214 516 89 132 684 43 Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Sat Flow, veh/h 135 328 1114 844 460 175 178 1289 222 21 1707 108 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 225 0 0 287 0 0 304 0 0 476 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1577 0 0 1479 0 0 1689 0 0 1836 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.2 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.16 0.71 0.66 0.12 0.19 0.13 0.03 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 665 0 0 691 0 0 819 0 0 859 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3253 0 0 2937 0 0 3316 0 0 3806 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.8 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 8.1 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 225 287 304 476
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.1 8.4 6.8 7.8
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.1 14.0 16.1 14.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 61.0 61.0 61.0 61.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 5.2 8.3 6.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.3 1.6 3.5 2.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 7.7
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 146
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 947 560 500 1267 0 206 0 133 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 947 560 500 1267 0 206 0 133 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 986 583 521 1320 0 215 0 139 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 3 1597 1251 698 2552 1138 337 277 233 3 6 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.20 0.72 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 2783 3456 3554 1585 3456 1870 1575 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 986 583 521 1320 0 215 0 139 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1392 1728 1777 1585 1728 1870 1575 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 12.6 8.7 8.5 10.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 12.6 8.7 8.5 10.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 3 1597 1251 698 2552 1138 337 277 233 3 6 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.62 0.47 0.75 0.52 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 179 2615 2048 1329 3625 1617 520 1282 1080 179 2258 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 12.5 11.5 22.4 3.8 0.0 26.0 0.0 23.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.4 0.3 1.6 0.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 4.4 2.3 3.3 1.9 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 12.9 11.7 24.0 3.9 0.0 28.0 0.0 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B C A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1569 1841 354 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.5 9.6 27.3 0.0
Approach LOS B A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s0.0 12.8 16.1 30.9 9.8 3.0 0.0 47.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s6.0 41.0 23.0 44.0 9.0 38.0 6.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 6.9 10.5 14.6 5.6 0.0 0.0 12.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.5 1.6 11.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 14.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 12.5
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 147
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 237 106 224 166 232 146 268 206 579 595 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 30 237 106 224 166 232 146 268 206 579 595 21 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 34 272 122 257 191 267 168 308 237 666 684 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 278 374 163 758 410 341 211 392 575 760 1089 38 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.12 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2395 1043 3456 1870 1553 1781 1870 2743 3456 3501 123 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 34 200 194 257 191 267 168 308 237 666 347 361 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1661 1728 1870 1553 1781 1870 1372 1728 1777 1847 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 8.8 9.2 5.1 7.3 13.3 7.5 12.8 6.1 15.3 13.7 13.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 8.8 9.2 5.1 7.3 13.3 7.5 12.8 6.1 15.3 13.7 13.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 278 277 259 758 410 341 211 392 575 760 553 575 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.72 0.75 0.34 0.47 0.78 0.80 0.79 0.41 0.88 0.63 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 434 433 405 1263 684 567 651 684 1003 842 866 900 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh29.8 32.9 33.1 27.0 27.9 30.2 35.2 30.7 28.1 30.9 24.2 24.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 3.5 4.3 0.3 0.8 4.0 6.7 3.5 0.5 9.6 1.2 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 3.9 3.9 2.1 3.3 5.2 3.5 5.9 2.0 7.1 5.6 5.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 30.0 36.5 37.4 27.3 28.7 34.2 41.9 34.2 28.5 40.5 25.4 25.3 LnGrp LOS C D D C C C D C C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 428 715 713 1374
Approach Delay, s/veh 36.4 30.2 34.1 32.7
Approach LOS D C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s22.1 21.2 16.8 13.7 29.5 22.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s17.3 14.8 11.2 9.5 15.7 15.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 2.4 1.6 0.4 4.4 2.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 33.0
HCM 7th LOS C
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 148
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1156 251 1788 127 27 1502
Future Volume (veh/h) 1156 251 1788 127 27 1502
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1257 273 1943 138 29 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1287 3066 843 715 203
Arrive On Green 0.37 0.86 0.45 0.45 0.06 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1257 273 1943 138 29 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 36.6 1.2 46.0 5.3 0.8 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 36.6 1.2 46.0 5.3 0.8 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h1287 3066 843 715 203
V/C Ratio(X) 0.98 0.09 2.30 0.19 0.14
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1287 3066 843 715 1152
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh31.6 1.0 28.0 16.8 45.6 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 19.6 0.0 590.3 0.1 0.3 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln18.2 0.1 157.8 1.9 0.4 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 51.1 1.1 618.3 17.0 45.9 0.0
LnGrp LOS D A F B D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1530 2081 29
Approach Delay, s/veh 42.2 578.4 45.9
Approach LOS D F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 92.0 10.0 42.0 50.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 38.0 46.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 2.8 38.6 48.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 348.8
HCM 7th LOS F
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 149
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 61 127 145 27 57 620
Future Volume (veh/h) 61 127 145 27 57 620
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On ApproachNo No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 67 140 159 30 63 681
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 359 319 587 496 146 991
Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.53
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1870 1580 1781 1870
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 67 140 159 30 63 681
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1585 1870 1580 1781 1870
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 2.3 1.9 0.4 1.0 8.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 2.3 1.9 0.4 1.0 8.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 359 319 587 496 146 991
V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.44 0.27 0.06 0.43 0.69
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1914 1703 4521 3819 837 5651
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.9 10.4 7.7 7.1 13.0 5.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.9 0.2 0.1 2.0 0.9
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.4 1.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 10.1 11.4 7.9 7.2 15.0 6.0
LnGrp LOS B B A A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 207 189 744
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.0 7.8 6.8
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.4 13.4 19.8 10.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s14.0 72.0 90.0 32.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.0 3.9 10.0 4.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.1 5.8 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 7.7
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 150
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 10
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 6 9 18 175 12 58 4 98 10 22 730 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 6 9 18 175 12 58 4 98 10 22 730 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 7 10 21 203 14 67 5 114 12 26 849 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 114 155 254 363 30 93 14 844 89 61 1001 0
Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.51 0.51 0.03 0.54 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 182 557 913 975 108 334 1781 1659 175 1781 1870 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 38 0 0 284 0 0 5 0 126 26 849 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1652 0 0 1417 0 0 1781 0 1834 1781 1870 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.4 1.0 25.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.4 1.0 25.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.18 0.55 0.71 0.24 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 523 0 0 486 0 0 14 0 933 61 1001 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.14 0.43 0.85 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1034 0 0 949 0 0 265 0 1803 292 1866 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh17.9 0.0 0.0 21.7 0.0 0.0 33.1 0.0 8.7 31.8 13.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.1 4.6 2.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.5 9.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 0.0 47.4 0.0 8.8 36.4 15.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS B C D A D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 38 284 131 875
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.0 22.8 10.2 16.0
Approach LOS B C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.3 38.2 22.7 4.5 39.9 22.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s11.0 66.0 41.0 10.0 67.0 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.0 4.4 3.1 2.2 27.9 14.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 8.0 1.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 17.0
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 151
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 11
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 45 28 319 41 0 0 0 0 184 43 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 45 28 319 41 0 0 0 0 184 43 16
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 52 32 367 47 0 211 49 18
Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 0 174 107 479 1007 0 333 77 28
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.54 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1073 660 1781 1870 0 1352 314 115
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 84 367 47 0 278 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1734 1781 1870 0 1781 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 1.6 7.0 0.4 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 1.6 7.0 0.4 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.38 1.00 0.00 0.76 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 0 280 479 1007 0 438 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.77 0.05 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 0 1448 2304 4183 0 1872 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 13.7 12.5 4.1 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.0 0.6 2.5 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 14.3 15.1 4.1 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A B
Approach Vol, veh/h 84 414 278
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.3 13.8 14.0
Approach LOS B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.0 10.0 13.1 24.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 48.0 31.0 39.0 83.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.0 3.6 7.2 2.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.4 1.8 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 14.0
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 152
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
15: SR 1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 12
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 73 180 0 0 289 340 57 0 156 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 73 180 0 0 289 340 57 0 156 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 0 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 78 194 0 0 311 366 61 0 168
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 159 1059 0 0 689 580 388 0 345
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.22 0.00 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 0 0 1870 1574 1781 0 1583
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 78 194 0 0 311 366 61 0 168
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1870 0 0 1870 1574 1781 0 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 1.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 7.1 1.0 0.0 3.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 1.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 7.1 1.0 0.0 3.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 159 1059 0 0 689 580 388 0 345
V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.63 0.16 0.00 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 577 4241 0 0 3433 2890 1827 0 1624 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh16.1 3.9 0.0 0.0 8.9 9.6 11.7 0.0 12.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.1 0.2 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.9 0.3 0.0 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.4 4.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 10.8 11.9 0.0 13.7 LnGrp LOS B A A B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 272 677 229
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.1 10.1 13.2
Approach LOS A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.1 25.0 7.3 17.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.0 84.0 12.0 68.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.4 3.9 3.5 9.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 1.2 0.1 3.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.3
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 153
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
16: Salinas Ave & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 13
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 971 11 25 795 0 3 0 20 0 0 1
Future Volume (veh/h) 1 971 11 25 795 0 3 0 20 0 0 1
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1 1142 13 29 935 0 4 0 24 0 0 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 87 1841 835 73 2363 0 113 18 196 0 0 228
Arrive On Green 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.04 0.66 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3486 1582 1781 3647 0 100 127 1365 0 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 613 530 13 29 935 0 28 0 0 0 0 1
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1870 1617 1582 1781 1777 0 1592 0 0 0 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 9.6 0.2 0.7 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.6 9.6 0.2 0.7 5.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.14 0.86 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h1074 854 835 73 2363 0 327 0 0 0 0 228 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.62 0.02 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3302 2787 2727 384 7230 0 1484 0 0 0 0 1404 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.9 6.9 4.7 19.5 3.2 0.0 15.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.7 0.0 3.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.5 2.2 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 7.4 7.7 4.7 23.0 3.3 0.0 15.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.3 LnGrp LOS A A A C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 1156 964 28 1
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.5 3.9 15.7 15.3
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 5.7 26.1 10.0 31.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 37.0 9.0 72.0 37.0 85.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 2.7 11.6 2.0 7.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 10.4 0.0 8.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.0
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 154
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
18: Driveway/Cardoza Ave & Reservation Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 39 289 7 6 432 23 7 0 19 77 0 159 Future Volume (veh/h) 39 289 7 6 432 23 7 0 19 77 0 159 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 41 307 7 6 460 24 7 0 20 82 0 169
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 101 1507 656 17 706 596 172 48 247 513 0 337 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.38 0.38 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1546 1781 1870 1579 181 223 1154 1387 0 1578 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 41 307 7 6 460 24 27 0 0 82 0 169
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1546 1781 1870 1579 1558 0 0 1387 0 1578 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 1.9 0.1 0.1 6.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 1.9 0.1 0.1 6.9 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 3.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.74 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 101 1507 656 17 706 596 466 0 0 513 0 337 V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.20 0.01 0.35 0.65 0.04 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 680 7308 3180 471 3627 3061 1831 0 0 1805 0 1808 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh15.5 6.2 5.7 16.7 8.8 6.7 10.7 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 11.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.1 0.0 11.5 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 2.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.1 6.2 5.7 28.2 9.8 6.7 10.8 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 12.9 LnGrp LOS B A A C A A B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 355 490 27 251
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.6 9.9 10.8 12.4
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 4.3 18.4 11.3 5.9 16.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.0 9.0 70.0 39.0 13.0 66.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 2.1 3.9 5.2 2.8 8.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 2.3 1.4 0.0 3.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 9.7
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 155
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
8: 4th St & Inter-Garrison Rd AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 148 57 146 691 0 0
Future Volume (vph) 148 57 146 691 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.96 1.00
Flt Protected 1.00 0.99
Satd. Flow (prot) 1779 1845
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.90
Satd. Flow (perm) 1779 1681
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 157 61 155 735 0 0
RTOR Reduction (vph) 15 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 203 0 0 890 0 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 12 2
Turn Type NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 4 8
Permitted Phases 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 29.0 29.0
Effective Green, g (s) 29.0 29.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.67
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1194 1128
v/s Ratio Prot 0.11
v/s Ratio Perm c0.53
v/c Ratio 0.17 0.79
Uniform Delay, d1 2.6 5.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 3.7
Delay (s) 2.7 8.7
Level of Service A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 2.7 8.7 0.0
Approach LOS A A A
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 43.2 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 156
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
17: Imjin Rd & Imjin Pkwy AM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 742 213 1263 1524 56 121
Future Volume (vph) 742 213 1263 1524 56 121
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 1770 3539 3254 1441
Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 1770 3539 3254 1441
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 789 227 1344 1621 60 129
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 133 0 0 60 59
Lane Group Flow (vph) 789 94 1344 1621 65 5
Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 4 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 29.5 29.5 46.3 79.8 7.5 7.5
Effective Green, g (s) 29.5 29.5 46.3 79.8 7.5 7.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.49 0.84 0.08 0.08
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1095 490 859 2963 256 113
v/s Ratio Prot c0.22 c0.76 0.46
v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.02 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.72 0.19 1.56 0.55 0.25 0.04
Uniform Delay, d1 29.2 24.1 24.5 2.3 41.3 40.6
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.2 259.8 0.2 0.5 0.2
Delay (s) 31.6 24.3 284.3 2.5 41.8 40.8
Level of Service C C F A D D
Approach Delay (s/veh) 30.0 130.2 41.4
Approach LOS C F D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 101.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.3 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 157

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 101 [California Dr/5th Ave & 8th St (Site Folder: Future 2045 With Improvements AM)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
Demand
Flows
Arrival
Flows
95% Back Of
Queue
Mov
ID
Turn Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Eff.

Stop
Rate
Aver.

No. of
Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: 5th Ave
3 L2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.010 2.8 LOS A 0.0 1.0 0.08 0.02 0.08 33.7 8 T1 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.010 2.8 LOS A 0.0 1.0 0.08 0.02 0.08 34.4 18 R2 All MCs 10 2.0 10 2.0 0.010 2.8 LOS A 0.0 1.0 0.08 0.02 0.08 34.1 Approach 13 2.0 13 2.0 0.010 2.8 LOS A 0.0 1.0 0.08 0.02 0.08 34.1 East: 8th St
1 L2 All MCs 4 2.0 4 2.0 0.217 3.9 LOS A 1.1 29.0 0.04 0.01 0.04 33.3 6 T1 All MCs 268 2.0 268 2.0 0.217 3.9 LOS A 1.1 29.0 0.04 0.01 0.04 34.0 16 R2 All MCs 22 2.0 22 2.0 0.217 3.9 LOS A 1.1 29.0 0.04 0.01 0.04 33.7 Approach 294 2.0 294 2.0 0.217 3.9 LOS A 1.1 29.0 0.04 0.01 0.04 33.9 North: California Dr
7 L2 All MCs 16 2.0 16 2.0 0.018 3.7 LOS A 0.1 1.8 0.39 0.22 0.39 31.6 4 T1 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.018 3.7 LOS A 0.1 1.8 0.39 0.22 0.39 32.2 14 R2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.018 3.7 LOS A 0.1 1.8 0.39 0.22 0.39 32.0 Approach 18 2.0 18 2.0 0.018 3.7 LOS A 0.1 1.8 0.39 0.22 0.39 31.7 West: 8th St
5 L2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.003 2.7 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.09 0.02 0.09 33.2 2 T1 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.003 2.7 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.09 0.02 0.09 33.8 12 R2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.003 2.7 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.09 0.02 0.09 33.6 Approach 4 2.0 4 2.0 0.003 2.7 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.09 0.02 0.09 33.5 All Vehicles 329 2.0 329 2.0 0.217 3.8 LOS A 1.1 29.0 0.06 0.02 0.06 33.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Const raint
effects.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Future 2045 With Improvements AM)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
Demand
Flows
Arrival
Flows
95% Back Of
Queue
Mov
ID
Turn Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Eff.

Stop
Rate
Aver.

No. of
Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Del Monte Blvd
3 L2 All MCs 165 2.0 165 2.0 0.244 5.5 LOS A 1.1 28.1 0.40 0.25 0.40 31.4 8 T1 All MCs 308 2.0 308 2.0 0.244 5.5 LOS A 1.1 28.1 0.40 0.25 0.40 32.7 18 R2 All MCs 67 2.0 67 2.0 0.244 5.5 LOS A 1.1 28.1 0.40 0.25 0.40 32.8 Approach 540 2.0 540 2.0 0.244 5.5 LOS A 1.1 28.1 0.40 0.25 0.40 32.3 East: Beach Rd
1 L2 All MCs 180 2.0 180 2.0 0.361 8.3 LOS A 1.6 40.5 0.59 0.49 0.61 30.2 6 T1 All MCs 79 2.0 79 2.0 0.361 8.3 LOS A 1.6 40.5 0.59 0.49 0.61 30.8 16 R2 All MCs 52 2.0 52 2.0 0.361 8.3 LOS A 1.6 40.5 0.59 0.49 0.61 30.5 Approach 311 2.0 311 2.0 0.361 8.3 LOS A 1.6 40.5 0.59 0.49 0.61 30.4 North: Del Monte Blvd
7 L2 All MCs 96 2.0 96 2.0 0.636 13.4 LOS B 6.6 167.4 0.76 0.75 1.22 29.0 4 T1 All MCs 998 2.0 998 2.0 0.636 13.4 LOS B 6.6 167.4 0.76 0.75 1.22 29.6 14 R2 All MCs 87 2.0 87 2.0 0.636 13.4 LOS B 6.6 167.4 0.76 0.75 1.22 29.5 Approach 1181 2.0 1181 2.0 0.636 13.4 LOS B 6.6 167.4 0.76 0.75 1.22 29.5 West: Beach Rd
5 L2 All MCs 62 2.0 62 2.0 0.373 16.6 LOS C 1.4 35.4 0.79 0.84 0.99 27.4 2 T1 All MCs 81 2.0 81 2.0 0.373 16.6 LOS C 1.4 35.4 0.79 0.84 0.99 27.9 12 R2 All MCs 249 2.0 249 2.0 0.570 21.2 LOS C 2.6 65.9 0.82 0.94 1.26 26.6 Approach 393 2.0 393 2.0 0.570 19.5 LOS C 2.6 65.9 0.81 0.91 1.16 27.0 All Vehicles 2425 2.0 2425 2.0 0.636 12.0 LOS B 6.6 167.4 0.67 0.63 0.95 29.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Const raint
effects.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Imjin Rd & 8th St (Site Folder: Future 2045 With Improvements AM)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
Demand
Flows
Arrival
Flows
95% Back Of
Queue
Mov
ID
Turn Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Eff.

Stop
Rate
Aver.

No. of
Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Driveway
3 L2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.052 6.6 LOS A 0.2 4.8 0.61 0.56 0.61 32.0 8 T1 All MCs 20 2.0 20 2.0 0.052 6.6 LOS A 0.2 4.8 0.61 0.56 0.61 32.6 18 R2 All MCs 10 2.0 10 2.0 0.052 6.6 LOS A 0.2 4.8 0.61 0.56 0.61 32.4 Approach 31 2.0 31 2.0 0.052 6.6 LOS A 0.2 4.8 0.61 0.56 0.61 32.5 East: 8th St
1 L2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.055 3.5 LOS A 0.2 6.0 0.26 0.13 0.26 33.6 6 T1 All MCs 39 2.0 39 2.0 0.055 3.5 LOS A 0.2 6.0 0.26 0.13 0.26 34.2 16 R2 All MCs 26 2.0 26 2.0 0.055 3.5 LOS A 0.2 6.0 0.26 0.13 0.26 33.9 Approach 66 2.0 66 2.0 0.055 3.5 LOS A 0.2 6.0 0.26 0.13 0.26 34.1 North: Imjin Rd
7 L2 All MCs 654 2.0 654 2.0 0.950 20.7 LOS C 43.2 1097.6 1.00 0.46 1.00 26.0 4 T1 All MCs 12 2.0 12 2.0 0.950 20.7 LOS C 43.2 1097.6 1.00 0.46 1.00 26.4 14 R2 All MCs 567 2.0 567 2.0 0.950 20.7 LOS C 43.2 1097.6 1.00 0.46 1.00 26.2 Approach 1232 2.0 1232 2.0 0.950 20.7 LOS C 43.2 1097.6 1.00 0.46 1.00 26.1 West: 8th St
5 L2 All MCs 104 2.0 104 2.0 0.171 7.3 LOS A 0.7 17.3 0.62 0.55 0.62 30.0 2 T1 All MCs 9 2.0 9 2.0 0.171 7.3 LOS A 0.7 17.3 0.62 0.55 0.62 30.5 12 R2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.171 7.3 LOS A 0.7 17.3 0.62 0.55 0.62 30.3 Approach 114 2.0 114 2.0 0.171 7.3 LOS A 0.7 17.3 0.62 0.55 0.62 30.1 All Vehicles 1443 2.0 1443 2.0 0.950 18.6 LOS C 43.2 1097.6 0.93 0.46 0.93 26.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Const raint
effects.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.1 | Copyright © 2000- 2022 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC | Licence: NETWORK / Enterprise Level 2 | Processed: Monday, June 2, 2025 4:02:04 PM Project: \\kimley- horn.com\ca_pls1\Project\SJC_TPTO\City of Marina\097789003- Marina DIF\2025 Update\05 Design & Analysis\Sidra\Marina DIF 2025_v2.sip9
160
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
1: 2nd Ave & Inter-Garrison Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 63 0 101 0 259 27 73 294 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 63 0 101 0 259 27 73 294 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 64 0 103 0 264 28 74 300 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 6 6 5 268 0 346 6 932 98 164 1825 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.51 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1579 1781 3242 341 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 64 0 103 0 144 148 74 300 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1579 1781 1777 1806 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.9 1.9 1.2 1.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.9 1.9 1.2 1.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 6 6 5 268 0 346 6 511 519 164 1825 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.28 0.29 0.45 0.16 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 357 1751 1484 953 0 2006 357 2674 2718 1489 7605 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 9.8 0.0 8.3 8.3 12.9 3.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 1.9 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.6 0.0 10.2 0.0 8.6 8.6 14.8 3.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 167 292 374
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 10.8 8.6 6.1
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.8 12.6 8.5 2.1 0.0 19.4 0.0 10.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 45.0 16.0 28.0 6.0 64.0 6.0 38.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 3.9 2.9 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 1.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 7.9
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 161
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
2: Driveway/Imjin Rd & 8th St PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th AWSC Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh17.7
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 144 44 0 0 486 0 130 0 10 9 80
Future Vol, veh/h 0 144 44 0 0 486 0 130 0 10 9 80
Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 166 51 0 0 559 0 149 0 11 10 92
Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 1
Conflicting Approach LeftSB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 2 2
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 2 2
HCM Control Delay, s/veh11.9 22.9 12.6 10.1

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 162
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
3: 5th St/California Dr & 8th St PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th TWSC Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 0 0 12 0 1 0 9 0 21 4 9
Future Vol, veh/h 7 0 0 12 0 1 0 9 0 21 4 9
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Free
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 0 - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 9 0 0 16 0 1 0 12 0 28 5 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 1 0 0 0 0 0 52 52 0
Stage 1 - - - - - - 19 19 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 33 33 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1621 - - - - - 957 839 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1004 880 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 989 867 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1621 - - - - - 951 0 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 951 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 998 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 989 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s/v7.23

HCM LOS -
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) - 1621 - - - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - - - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - 7.2 - - - - -
HCM Lane LOS - A - - - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - - - -
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 163
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
5: California Dr/California Ave & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 324 1867 0 13 1268 62 0 0 0 30 0 223 Future Volume (veh/h) 324 1867 0 13 1268 62 0 0 0 30 0 223 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 331 1905 0 13 1294 63 0 0 0 31 0 228 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 380 2359 1052 33 1667 741 2 173 0 65 329 279 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.66 0.00 0.02 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1580 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1582 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 331 1905 0 13 1294 63 0 0 0 31 0 228 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1580 1781 1870 0 1781 1870 1582 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.2 33.0 0.0 0.6 25.8 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 11.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.2 33.0 0.0 0.6 25.8 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 11.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 380 2359 1052 33 1667 741 2 173 0 65 329 279 V/C Ratio(X) 0.87 0.81 0.00 0.39 0.78 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 672 2849 1271 126 1760 782 126 750 0 126 750 634 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.2 10.3 0.0 41.1 18.8 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.1 0.0 33.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.2 1.5 0.0 7.3 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 5.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.0 10.9 0.0 0.3 10.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 4.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 38.5 11.8 0.0 48.5 20.9 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.3 0.0 39.5 LnGrp LOS D B D C B D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2236 1370 0 259
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.8 20.8 0.0 40.2
Approach LOS B C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.1 11.8 5.6 60.3 0.0 18.9 22.1 43.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 34.0 6.0 68.0 6.0 34.0 32.0 42.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 0.0 2.6 35.0 0.0 13.8 17.2 27.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.4 0.0 0.7 0.9 8.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.2
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 164
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
6: California Ave & Reindollar Ave PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 32 44 36 58 21 28 60 183 126 40 162 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 32 44 36 58 21 28 60 183 126 40 162 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 35 48 40 64 23 31 66 201 138 44 178 44 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 260 226 144 385 141 107 234 384 232 228 524 115 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 Sat Flow, veh/h 271 848 540 601 527 402 158 939 567 141 1281 282 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 123 0 0 118 0 0 405 0 0 266 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1660 0 0 1529 0 0 1665 0 0 1704 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.28 0.33 0.54 0.26 0.16 0.34 0.17 0.17
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 630 0 0 633 0 0 851 0 0 867 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2656 0 0 2481 0 0 5656 0 0 5679 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.1 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 7.3 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 123 118 405 266
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.3 7.2 6.0 5.2
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.1 10.6 14.1 10.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 84.0 38.0 84.0 38.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 3.4 4.5 3.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.1 0.7 1.9 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.1
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 165
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
9: 2nd Ave & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 1810 457 343 1217 0 419 0 407 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 1810 457 343 1217 0 419 0 407 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 1885 476 357 1268 0 436 0 424 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 2 1669 1306 380 2202 982 519 562 474 2 393 0 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.11 0.62 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 2781 3456 3554 1585 3456 1870 1579 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 1885 476 357 1268 0 436 0 424 0 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1390 1728 1777 1585 1728 1870 1579 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 47.0 11.0 10.3 21.1 0.0 12.3 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 47.0 11.0 10.3 21.1 0.0 12.3 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 2 1669 1306 380 2202 982 519 562 474 2 393 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 1.13 0.36 0.94 0.58 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 107 1669 1306 380 2202 982 656 935 789 107 1314 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 26.5 17.0 44.2 11.3 0.0 41.4 0.0 33.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 66.5 0.2 31.2 0.4 0.0 7.8 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 34.1 3.4 6.0 7.7 0.0 5.7 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 93.0 17.1 75.4 11.6 0.0 49.2 0.0 41.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS F B E B D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2361 1625 860 0
Approach Delay, s/veh 77.7 25.6 45.2 0.0
Approach LOS E C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s0.0 34.1 15.0 51.0 19.0 15.1 0.0 66.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s6.0 50.0 11.0 47.0 19.0 37.0 6.0 52.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s0.0 27.7 12.3 49.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 23.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 11.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 54.5
HCM 7th LOS D
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 166
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
10: Del Monte Blvd & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 41 231 162 385 295 355 155 393 460 289 248 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 41 231 162 385 295 355 155 393 460 289 248 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 243 171 405 311 374 163 414 484 304 261 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 286 321 215 983 532 435 202 496 710 398 933 32 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.27 0.27 0.12 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2002 1342 3456 1870 1529 1781 1870 2679 3456 3500 120 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 214 200 405 311 374 163 414 484 304 132 138 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1567 1728 1870 1529 1781 1870 1340 1728 1777 1843 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 10.6 11.2 8.7 13.1 21.2 8.2 19.1 14.9 7.8 5.4 5.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 10.6 11.2 8.7 13.1 21.2 8.2 19.1 14.9 7.8 5.4 5.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 286 285 252 983 532 435 202 496 710 398 474 492 V/C Ratio(X) 0.15 0.75 0.79 0.41 0.58 0.86 0.81 0.84 0.68 0.76 0.28 0.28 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 389 388 342 1131 612 501 583 612 877 754 776 804 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh33.1 36.7 37.0 26.6 28.1 31.0 39.6 31.8 30.2 39.3 26.6 26.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 5.4 8.7 0.3 1.1 12.7 7.3 8.2 1.6 3.1 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.8 4.9 4.8 3.6 5.9 9.1 3.9 9.4 4.8 3.4 2.3 2.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 33.3 42.1 45.7 26.8 29.2 43.8 47.0 40.0 31.8 42.4 26.9 26.9 LnGrp LOS C D D C C D D D C D C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 457 1090 1061 574
Approach Delay, s/veh 42.9 33.3 37.3 35.1
Approach LOS D C D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s14.6 28.3 18.7 14.4 28.4 30.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.0 30.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s9.8 21.1 13.2 10.2 7.4 23.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 3.1 1.5 0.4 1.5 2.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 36.4
HCM 7th LOS D
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 167
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
11: Reservation Rd & Blanco Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1200 1431 761 55 86 1129
Future Volume (veh/h) 1200 1431 761 55 86 1129
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1263 1506 801 58 91 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 1352 3057 803 680 207
Arrive On Green 0.39 0.86 0.43 0.43 0.06 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 3647 1870 1585 3456 2790
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1263 1506 801 58 91 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1728 1777 1870 1585 1728 1395
Q Serve(g_s), s 35.1 10.3 42.8 2.2 2.5 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 35.1 10.3 42.8 2.2 2.5 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h1352 3057 803 680 207
V/C Ratio(X) 0.93 0.49 1.00 0.09 0.44
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1414 3121 803 680 1173
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh29.3 1.7 28.6 16.9 45.5 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.4 0.1 31.2 0.1 1.5 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln16.2 1.3 25.2 0.8 1.1 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 40.6 1.8 59.8 17.0 46.9 0.0
LnGrp LOS D A E B D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2769 859 91
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.5 56.9 46.9
Approach LOS B E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 90.2 10.0 43.2 47.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 88.0 34.0 41.0 43.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 4.5 37.1 44.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 19.9 0.3 2.1 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 28.8
HCM 7th LOS C
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 168
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
12: California Ave & Marina Heights Dr PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 59 332 56 62 199
Future Volume (veh/h) 46 59 332 56 62 199
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On ApproachNo No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 49 63 353 60 66 212
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 352 313 605 499 150 1009
Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.32 0.32 0.08 0.54
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1870 1543 1781 1870
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 49 63 353 60 66 212
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1585 1870 1543 1781 1870
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 1.0 4.8 0.8 1.1 1.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 1.0 4.8 0.8 1.1 1.8
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 352 313 605 499 150 1009
V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.20 0.58 0.12 0.44 0.21
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1875 1668 4060 3348 1172 5537
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh10.1 10.2 8.6 7.2 13.2 3.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.1 2.0 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.2 0.3 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 10.3 10.5 9.5 7.3 15.2 3.7
LnGrp LOS B B A A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 112 413 278
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.4 9.2 6.5
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.6 13.8 20.4 10.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s20.0 66.0 90.0 32.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.1 6.8 3.8 3.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.6 1.4 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 8.4
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 169
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
13: General Jim Moore Blvd/4th Ave & Divarty St PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 10
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 12 10 33 15 131 18 439 23 12 116 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 12 10 33 15 131 18 439 23 12 116 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 15 12 41 19 164 22 549 29 15 145 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 225 193 114 148 62 284 58 754 40 41 713 59
Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.43 0.43 0.02 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow, veh/h 408 768 455 168 246 1133 1781 1758 93 1781 1700 141 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 0 0 224 0 0 22 0 578 15 0 157
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1632 0 0 1548 0 0 1781 0 1851 1781 0 1840 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.5 0.3 0.0 2.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.5 0.3 0.0 2.2 Prop In Lane 0.37 0.28 0.18 0.73 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 532 0 0 494 0 0 58 0 794 41 0 772 V/C Ratio(X) 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.73 0.37 0.00 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2206 0 0 2212 0 0 573 0 2383 441 0 2233 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh11.6 0.0 0.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 19.1 0.0 9.6 19.4 0.0 7.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 1.3 5.4 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 3.2 0.2 0.0 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 11.7 0.0 0.0 13.8 0.0 0.0 23.2 0.0 10.9 24.8 0.0 7.6 LnGrp LOS B B C B C A
Approach Vol, veh/h 43 224 600 172
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.7 13.8 11.3 9.1
Approach LOS B B B A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s4.9 21.3 14.1 5.3 20.9 14.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s10.0 52.0 56.0 13.0 49.0 56.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.3 12.5 2.8 2.5 4.2 7.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.5 0.2 0.0 1.0 1.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 11.5
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 170
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
14: SR 1 Southbound Ramp & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 11
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 103 32 231 95 0 0 0 0 457 0 55 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 103 32 231 95 0 0 0 0 457 0 55
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 127 40 285 117 0 564 0 68
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 0 200 63 358 783 0 688 0 83
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.42 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.44 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1362 429 1781 1870 0 1569 0 189
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 167 285 117 0 632 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1791 1781 1870 0 1758 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 4.9 8.5 2.2 0.0 17.7 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 4.9 8.5 2.2 0.0 17.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.24 1.00 0.00 0.89 0.11
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 0 263 358 783 0 771 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.80 0.15 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 0 1087 1208 2536 0 1442 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 22.5 21.3 10.1 0.0 13.8 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 2.5 4.1 0.1 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.0 2.1 3.7 0.8 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 25.0 25.4 10.2 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 167 402 632
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.0 21.0 16.0
Approach LOS C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.3 12.2 28.6 27.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.0 34.0 46.0 76.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.5 6.9 19.7 4.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 0.9 4.9 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.9
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 171
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
15: SR 1 Northbound Ramp & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 12
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 67 485 0 0 337 387 44 0 326 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 67 485 0 0 337 387 44 0 326 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 0 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 68 495 0 0 344 395 45 0 333
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 139 1001 0 0 678 573 491 0 437
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.28 0.00 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 0 0 1870 1581 1781 0 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 68 495 0 0 344 395 45 0 333
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1870 0 0 1870 1581 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 7.1 0.0 0.0 6.1 9.0 0.8 0.0 8.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 7.1 0.0 0.0 6.1 9.0 0.8 0.0 8.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 139 1001 0 0 678 573 491 0 437
V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.69 0.09 0.00 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 464 3010 0 0 2346 1983 2276 0 2026 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh18.7 6.2 0.0 0.0 10.5 11.4 11.4 0.0 14.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.5 0.1 0.0 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.7 1.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.7 0.3 0.0 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 21.3 6.6 0.0 0.0 11.1 12.9 11.5 0.0 16.8 LnGrp LOS C A B B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 563 739 378
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.4 12.1 16.2
Approach LOS A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.6 26.6 7.3 19.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 54.0 68.0 11.0 53.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.1 9.1 3.5 11.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 3.7 0.1 3.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 11.8
HCM 7th LOS B
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 172
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
16: Salinas Ave & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 13
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 808 13 20 999 0 8 0 27 0 0 5
Future Volume (veh/h) 1 808 13 20 999 0 8 0 27 0 0 5
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1 842 14 21 1041 0 8 0 28 0 0 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 107 1517 689 57 2081 0 160 33 220 0 0 282
Arrive On Green 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.03 0.59 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 1 3485 1583 1781 3647 0 168 186 1239 0 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 452 391 14 21 1041 0 36 0 0 0 0 5
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1869 1617 1583 1781 1777 0 1593 0 0 0 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 6.1 0.2 0.4 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.1 6.1 0.2 0.4 5.8 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.22 0.78 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 920 704 689 57 2081 0 413 0 0 0 0 282 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.56 0.02 0.37 0.50 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 4075 3446 3375 475 8942 0 1829 0 0 0 0 1736 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.1 7.1 5.4 16.0 4.1 0.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.7 0.0 4.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.5 1.4 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 7.5 7.8 5.4 20.0 4.3 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.5 LnGrp LOS A A A C A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 857 1062 36 5
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.6 4.6 11.8 11.5
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 5.1 18.7 10.0 23.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 37.0 9.0 72.0 37.0 85.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 2.4 8.1 2.1 7.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 6.6 0.0 10.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 6.1
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 173
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
18: Driveway/Cardoza Ave & Reservation Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Page 14
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 102 646 17 16 646 81 10 1 11 58 1 67 Future Volume (veh/h) 102 646 17 16 646 81 10 1 11 58 1 67 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 103 653 17 16 653 82 10 1 11 59 1 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 174 1985 876 43 907 759 184 46 112 370 3 226 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.56 0.56 0.02 0.49 0.49 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1568 1781 1870 1565 452 321 773 1400 23 1562 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 653 17 16 653 82 22 0 0 59 0 69 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1568 1781 1870 1565 1546 0 0 1400 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 4.4 0.2 0.4 12.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 4.4 0.2 0.4 12.2 1.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.50 1.00 0.99
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 174 1985 876 43 907 759 343 0 0 370 0 229 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.33 0.02 0.37 0.72 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 769 5731 2529 324 2549 2133 1429 0 0 1408 0 1404 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh19.0 5.3 4.3 21.1 9.0 6.2 16.3 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.1 0.0 5.2 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 3.7 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 22.2 5.4 4.3 26.4 10.1 6.2 16.4 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 17.6 LnGrp LOS C A A C B A B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 773 751 22 128
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.6 10.0 16.4 17.3
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 5.1 28.6 10.4 8.3 25.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.0 8.0 71.0 39.0 19.0 60.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.5 2.4 6.4 3.7 4.4 14.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 5.4 0.6 0.2 5.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 9.5
HCM 7th LOS A
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 174
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
8: 4th St & Inter-Garrison Rd PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 644 56 60 165 0 0
Future Volume (vph) 644 56 60 165 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.99 1.00
Flt Protected 1.00 0.99
Satd. Flow (prot) 1837 1836
Flt Permitted 1.00 0.76
Satd. Flow (perm) 1837 1412
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Adj. Flow (vph) 716 62 67 183 0 0
RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 774 0 0 250 0 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 21 21 19 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Turn Type NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 4 8
Permitted Phases 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 20.3 20.3
Effective Green, g (s) 20.3 20.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.59
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1084 833
v/s Ratio Prot c0.42
v/s Ratio Perm 0.18
v/c Ratio 0.71 0.30
Uniform Delay, d1 5.0 3.5
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 0.2
Delay (s) 7.2 3.7
Level of Service A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 7.2 3.7 0.0
Approach LOS A A A
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 6.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 34.4 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 175
Marina DIF - 2023 Update Plus Project Conditions
17: Imjin Rd & Imjin Pkwy PM Peak
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1810 62 166 1090 187 442
Future Volume (vph) 1810 62 166 1090 187 442
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85
Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 1770 3539 3241 1441
Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 1770 3539 3241 1441
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adj. Flow (vph) 1946 67 178 1172 201 475
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 161 161
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1946 54 178 1172 278 76
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2
Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Perm Perm
Protected Phases 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 4 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 66.9 66.9 13.6 85.0 16.5 16.5
Effective Green, g (s) 66.9 66.9 13.6 85.0 16.5 16.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.12 0.77 0.15 0.15
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2142 958 217 2722 483 215
v/s Ratio Prot c0.55 c0.10 0.33
v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.09 0.05
v/c Ratio 0.91 0.06 0.82 0.43 0.58 0.35
Uniform Delay, d1 19.1 8.9 47.3 4.4 43.7 42.2
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 6.1 0.0 21.3 0.1 1.7 1.0
Delay (s) 25.2 8.9 68.6 4.5 45.4 43.2
Level of Service C A E A D D
Approach Delay (s/veh) 24.7 13.0 44.6
Approach LOS C B D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 24.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.5 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF.

Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. 176

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 101 [California Dr/5th Ave & 8th St (Site Folder: Future 2045 With Improvements PM)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
Demand
Flows
Arrival
Flows
95% Back Of
Queue
Mov
ID
Turn Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Eff.

Stop
Rate
Aver.

No. of
Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: 5th Ave
3 L2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.011 2.8 LOS A 0.0 1.2 0.13 0.03 0.13 33.7 8 T1 All MCs 12 2.0 12 2.0 0.011 2.8 LOS A 0.0 1.2 0.13 0.03 0.13 34.3 18 R2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.011 2.8 LOS A 0.0 1.2 0.13 0.03 0.13 34.1 Approach 15 2.0 15 2.0 0.011 2.8 LOS A 0.0 1.2 0.13 0.03 0.13 34.2 East: 8th St
1 L2 All MCs 16 2.0 16 2.0 0.014 2.8 LOS A 0.1 1.5 0.09 0.02 0.09 32.0 6 T1 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.014 2.8 LOS A 0.1 1.5 0.09 0.02 0.09 32.6 16 R2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.014 2.8 LOS A 0.1 1.5 0.09 0.02 0.09 32.4 Approach 19 2.0 19 2.0 0.014 2.8 LOS A 0.1 1.5 0.09 0.02 0.09 32.1 North: California Dr
7 L2 All MCs 28 2.0 28 2.0 0.034 2.9 LOS A 0.1 3.7 0.09 0.02 0.09 32.5 4 T1 All MCs 5 2.0 5 2.0 0.034 2.9 LOS A 0.1 3.7 0.09 0.02 0.09 33.1 14 R2 All MCs 12 2.0 12 2.0 0.034 2.9 LOS A 0.1 3.7 0.09 0.02 0.09 32.8 Approach 45 2.0 45 2.0 0.034 2.9 LOS A 0.1 3.7 0.09 0.02 0.09 32.6 West: 8th St
5 L2 All MCs 9 2.0 9 2.0 0.009 2.9 LOS A 0.0 1.0 0.15 0.04 0.15 32.2 2 T1 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.009 2.9 LOS A 0.0 1.0 0.15 0.04 0.15 32.7 12 R2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.009 2.9 LOS A 0.0 1.0 0.15 0.04 0.15 32.5 Approach 12 2.0 12 2.0 0.009 2.9 LOS A 0.0 1.0 0.15 0.04 0.15 32.3 All Vehicles 91 2.0 91 2.0 0.034 2.9 LOS A 0.1 3.7 0.10 0.02 0.10 32.7 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Const raint
effects.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd (Site Folder: Future 2045 With Improvements PM)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
Demand
Flows
Arrival
Flows
95% Back Of
Queue
Mov
ID
Turn Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Eff.

Stop
Rate
Aver.

No. of
Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Del Monte Blvd
3 L2 All MCs 262 2.0 262 2.0 0.347 6.4 LOS A 1.8 45.8 0.40 0.22 0.40 30.9 8 T1 All MCs 441 2.0 441 2.0 0.347 6.4 LOS A 1.8 45.8 0.40 0.22 0.40 32.3 18 R2 All MCs 105 2.0 105 2.0 0.347 6.4 LOS A 1.8 45.8 0.40 0.22 0.40 32.4 Approach 808 2.0 808 2.0 0.347 6.4 LOS A 1.8 45.8 0.40 0.22 0.40 31.8 East: Beach Rd
1 L2 All MCs 42 2.0 42 2.0 0.261 8.2 LOS A 1.0 24.5 0.61 0.56 0.61 30.9 6 T1 All MCs 78 2.0 78 2.0 0.261 8.2 LOS A 1.0 24.5 0.61 0.56 0.61 31.4 16 R2 All MCs 62 2.0 62 2.0 0.261 8.2 LOS A 1.0 24.5 0.61 0.56 0.61 31.2 Approach 182 2.0 182 2.0 0.261 8.2 LOS A 1.0 24.5 0.61 0.56 0.61 31.2 North: Del Monte Blvd
7 L2 All MCs 58 2.0 58 2.0 0.227 5.9 LOS A 1.0 24.5 0.49 0.36 0.49 31.8 4 T1 All MCs 313 2.0 313 2.0 0.227 5.9 LOS A 1.0 24.5 0.49 0.36 0.49 32.7 14 R2 All MCs 67 2.0 67 2.0 0.227 5.9 LOS A 1.0 24.5 0.49 0.36 0.49 32.6 Approach 438 2.0 438 2.0 0.227 5.9 LOS A 1.0 24.5 0.49 0.36 0.49 32.6 West: Beach Rd
5 L2 All MCs 60 2.0 60 2.0 0.145 5.4 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.47 0.36 0.47 31.7 2 T1 All MCs 69 2.0 69 2.0 0.145 5.4 LOS A 0.6 14.1 0.47 0.36 0.47 32.2 12 R2 All MCs 171 2.0 171 2.0 0.178 5.4 LOS A 0.7 17.4 0.46 0.34 0.46 32.8 Approach 300 2.0 300 2.0 0.178 5.4 LOS A 0.7 17.4 0.46 0.35 0.46 32.4 All Vehicles 1729 2.0 1729 2.0 0.347 6.3 LOS A 1.8 45.8 0.46 0.31 0.46 32.1 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Const raint
effects.

MOVEMENT SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Imjin Rd & 8th St (Site Folder: Future 2045 With Improvements PM)]
Output produced by SIDRA INTERSECTION Version: 9.1.1.200 New Site
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Vehicle Movement Performance
Demand
Flows
Arrival
Flows
95% Back Of
Queue
Mov
ID
Turn Mov
Class
Deg.

Satn
Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Prop.

Que
Eff.

Stop
Rate
Aver.

No. of
Cycles
Aver.

Speed
[ Total HV ] [ Total HV ] [ Veh. Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h % v/c sec veh ft mph
South: Driveway
3 L2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.135 4.4 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.34 0.19 0.34 33.1 8 T1 All MCs 149 2.0 149 2.0 0.135 4.4 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.34 0.19 0.34 33.7 18 R2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.135 4.4 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.34 0.19 0.34 33.5 Approach 152 2.0 152 2.0 0.135 4.4 LOS A 0.6 15.5 0.34 0.19 0.34 33.7 East: 8th St
1 L2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.486 8.3 LOS A 3.3 84.8 0.48 0.25 0.48 31.3 6 T1 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.486 8.3 LOS A 3.3 84.8 0.48 0.25 0.48 31.9 16 R2 All MCs 559 2.0 559 2.0 0.486 8.3 LOS A 3.3 84.8 0.48 0.25 0.48 31.7 Approach 561 2.0 561 2.0 0.486 8.3 LOS A 3.3 84.8 0.48 0.25 0.48 31.7 North: Imjin Rd
7 L2 All MCs 11 2.0 11 2.0 0.084 3.1 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.03 0.00 0.03 33.6 4 T1 All MCs 10 2.0 10 2.0 0.084 3.1 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.03 0.00 0.03 34.2 14 R2 All MCs 92 2.0 92 2.0 0.084 3.1 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.03 0.00 0.03 33.9 Approach 114 2.0 114 2.0 0.084 3.1 LOS A 0.4 9.6 0.03 0.00 0.03 33.9 West: 8th St
5 L2 All MCs 1 2.0 1 2.0 0.164 3.9 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.11 0.03 0.11 33.4 2 T1 All MCs 166 2.0 166 2.0 0.164 3.9 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.11 0.03 0.11 34.0 12 R2 All MCs 51 2.0 51 2.0 0.164 3.9 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.11 0.03 0.11 33.7 Approach 217 2.0 217 2.0 0.164 3.9 LOS A 0.8 20.4 0.11 0.03 0.11 33.9 All Vehicles 1044 2.0 1044 2.0 0.486 6.2 LOS A 3.3 84.8 0.33 0.17 0.33 32.6 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Options tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches an d intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6.

Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Stopline Delay: Geometric Delay is not included).

Queue Model: SIDRA queue estimation methods are used for Back of Queue and Queue at Start of Gap.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity Formula: Siegloch M1 implied by US HCM 6 Roundabout Capacity Model.

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.

Arrival Flows used in performance calculations are adjusted to include any Initial Queued Demand and Upstream Capacity Const raint
effects.

Description ADT
Volume LOS
16 Del Monte(2nd Ave)/Patton Parkway Extension 2-Lane Collector 3,733 A 17 8th Street - 3rd Ave to Intergarrison 2-Lane Collector 4,290 A 18 Salinas Avenue - Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue 2-Lane Collector 830 A 19 Imjin Parkway (12th) & SR1 Interchange 2-Lane Collector 4,480 A 20 Del Monte Blvd. - Beach Road to Marina Greens Drive 2-Lane Collector 2,460 A 21 Del Monte & SR 1 Interchange 4-Lane Expressway 24,610 B 22 Reservation Road - Beach to SR1 2-Lane Arterial (w/ left-turn lane) 8,080 A 23 Reservation Road - Imjin Road to Blanco Road 4-Lane Divided Arterial (w/ left-turn lane) 17,890 A 24 Airport Access Road - - -
Roadway Segment
Existing
Description ADT
Volume LOS
16 Del Monte(2nd Ave)/Patton Parkway Extension 2-Lane Collector 4,075 A 17 8th Street - 3rd Ave to Intergarrison 2-Lane Collector 7,466 B 18 Salinas Avenue - Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue 2-Lane Collector 722 A 19 Imjin Parkway (12th) & SR1 Interchange 2-Lane Collector 20,078 F 20 Del Monte Blvd. - Beach Road to Marina Greens Drive 2-Lane Collector 10,073 D 21 Del Monte & SR 1 Interchange 4-Lane Expressway 20,673 B 22 Reservation Road - Beach to SR1 2-Lane Arterial (w/ left-turn lane) 15,360 D 23 Reservation Road - Imjin Road to Blanco Road 4-Lane Divided Arterial (w/ left-turn lane) 42,173 F 24 Airport Access Road - - -
Roadway Segment
Future No Project
Description ADT
Volume LOS
16 Del Monte(2nd Ave)/Patton Parkway Extension 2-Lane Collector 4,075 A 17 8th Street - 3rd Ave to Intergarrison 2-Lane Arterial (w/ left-turn lane) 7,466 A 18 Salinas Avenue - Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue 2-Lane Collector 722 A 19 Imjin Parkway (12th) & SR1 Interchange 4-Lane Freeway 20,078 A 20 Del Monte Blvd. - Beach Road to Marina Greens Drive 4-Lane Undivided Arterial (no left-turn lane) 10,073 A 21 Del Monte & SR 1 Interchange 4-Lane Expressway 20,673 B 22 Reservation Road - Beach to SR1 4-Lane Divided Arterial (w/ left-turn lane) 15,360 A 23 Reservation Road - Imjin Road to Blanco Road 6-Lane Expressway 42,173 C 24 Airport Access Road 2-Lane Collector 5,000 A
Roadway Segment
Future With Project
180
Public Public
Land Use Category per Unit Facility Safety Parks Intersections Roadways Residential
Single Family per KSF $804 $1,948 $4,661 $2,134 $6,015
Senior Homes per KSF $1,307 $3,168 $7,578 - -
Senior Homes per DU - - - $2,438 $6,873
Assisted Living per KSF $653 $1,584 $3,789 - -
Assisted Living per DU - - - $1,471 $4,146
Multifamily per KSF $1,547 $3,749 $8,971 - -
Multifamily per DU - - - $3,813 $10,748
Nonresidential
Office/Research per KSF $956 $2,318 - $6,069 $17,108
Retail/Service per KSF $574 $1,391 - $9,688 $27,309
Industrial per KSF $191 $464 - $2,783 $7,846
Hotel per Room $144 $348 - $4,473 $12,610
Church per KSF $191 $464 - $4,033 $11,370
Daycare Center per KSF $765 $1,854 - $23,883 $67,327
Animal Hospital/Clinic per KSF $1,147 $2,781 - $12,288 $34,639 Medical/Dental per KSF $1,147 $2,781 - $20,575 $58,000
(1) SF = Square Feet, KSF = 1000 Square Feet, DU = Dwelling Units, Hotel Fees are per Room. (2) Adjustments for rounding of $1 or less on total fees have been made to reflect rounding in the study.

Attachment C
Public Facilities, Public Safety, Parks, Intersections and Roadways 181
1 Current Development Impact Fee Schedule
Land Use Unit (1) Public Building Public Safety Parks Intersections Roadways Proposed Total Residential
Single Family DU $4,983 $1,074 $10,791 $2,275 $9,396 $28,519 Senior Homes DU $3,323 $714 $7,194 $881 $3,632 $15,744
Assisted Living – Senior DU $1,845 $397 $3,996 $633 $2,606 $9,477 Multifamily DU $4,615 $993 $9,991 $1,592 $6,563 $23,754 Non-Residential
Office/Research KSF $347 $651 - $2,593 $10,699 $14,290
Retail/Service KSF $209 $389 - $4,359 $17,983 $22,940
Industrial KSF $71 $129 - $1,638 $6,761 $8,599
Hotel ROOM $94 $177 - $1,920 $7,926 $10,117
Church KSF $71 $129 - $2,141 $8,837 $11,178
Day Care Center KSF $278 $522 - $17,415 $71,842 $90,057 Animal Hospital/Clinic KSF $417 $780 - $11,098 $45,786 $58,081 Medical Office KSF $417 $780 - $8,494 $35,048 $44,739
(1) KSF = 1,000 Square Feet, DU = Dwelling units
Attachment D
182
2 Proposed Development Impact Fee Schedule
Land Use Unit (1) Public Building Public Safety Parks Intersections Roadways Proposed Total Residential
Single Family DU $2,009 $4,870 $11,653 $5,334 $15,038 $38,904 Senior Homes DU $1,437 $3,484 $8,336 $2,438 $6,873 $22,568 Assisted Living – Senior DU $719 $1,742 $4,168 $1,471 $4,146 $12,246 Multifamily DU $1,701 $4,124 $9,868 $3,813 $10,748 $30,254 Non-Residential
Office/Research KSF $956 $2,318 - $6,069 $17,108 $26,451 Retail/Service KSF $574 $1,391 - $9,688 $27,309 $38,962 Industrial KSF $191 $464 - $2,783 $7,846 $11,284
Hotel ROOM $144 $348 - $4,473 $12,610 $17,575
Church KSF $191 $464 - $4,033 $11,370 $16,058
Day Care Center KSF $765 $1,854 - $23,883 $67,327 $93,829 Animal Hospital/Clinic KSF $1,147 $2,781 - $12,288 $34,639 $50,855 Medical Office KSF $1,147 $2,781 - $20,575 $58,000 $82,503 2,500 SF
1,100 SF
1,100 SF
1,100 SF
Typical Size
(1) KSF = 1,000 Square Feet, DU = Dwelling units
183

Marina City CouncilSeptember 16, 2025

Marina City Council
September 16, 2025