Marina City Council
April 7, 2026

MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Annual Military Equipment Report
Calendar Year 2025 — Corrected
Pursuant to California Government Code §7072
Reporting Period: January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025

EXHIBIT A
5 Marina Police Department — AB 481 Annual Report 2025

1. Introduction
This report is submitted in compliance with California Government Code §7072 (Assembly Bill 481), which requires law enforcement agencies to provide an annual military equipment report to the governing body. This corrected report supersedes the previously submitted SRU deployment log and addresses all statutory requirements.

Key facts regarding the Marina Police Department's military equipment program:
• The Marina Police Department does not participate in the Department of Defense 1033 Program.
• No equipment in the Department's inventory was designed or intended for battlefield use.
• All military equipment is governed by Marina PD Policy 707 (Military Equipment), adopted August 24, 2023, in accordance with Lexipol standards. • The Marina Police Department is a member agency of the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit (MPRSRU).
• This report covers the period from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025.

2. Summary of Equipment Use and Purpose
The following sections detail the use, purpose, and deployment history for each category of military equipment maintained by the Marina Police Department during the 2025 reporting period.

A. UAS/Drones (4 Units) — Gov Code §7070(c)(1)
• Inventory: 2x DJI Mavic Mini 2, 1x DJI Mavic Enterprise, 1x DJI Mavic Air 2 • Authorized Uses: Search and rescue operations, suspect apprehension support, crime scene documentation, tactical operations support, disaster assessment • Governing Policies: Marina PD Policy 612 (UAS Operations) and Policy 707 (Military Equipment)
• 2025 Usage: Deployed during 2 SRU callouts in Marina (March 27, 2025 and September 10, 2025), plus 5 additional regional SRU deployments in support of multi-jurisdictional operations.
• All drone deployments in 2025 were consistent with Policy 612 and Policy 707 authorized uses.

B. MPRSRU Rescue Vehicle / Lenco BearCat — Gov Code §7070(c)(3) • Inventory: 1x Lenco BearCat Armored Vehicle (registered to Marina PD; shared MPRSRU asset)
• Authorized Uses: Critical incident response including hostage situations, barricaded subjects, active shooter incidents, and high-risk warrant service • Governing Policies: Marina PD Policy 614 (High Risk Operations) and Policy 707 (Military Equipment)
• 2025 Usage: Deployed 9 times regionally, including 2 incidents within the City of Marina:

Detailed Deployment Log:

EXHIBIT A
6 Marina Police Department — AB 481 Annual Report 2025

• March 27, 2025 — Marina: Open field search for attempted murder suspect. Suspect had beaten and attempted to shoot a victim at a Monterey hotel, fled in a vehicle, and crashed near a greenbelt area in Marina. SRU located the suspect at a nearby hotel.

Equipment deployed: Command Post, BearCat, Drones.
• September 10, 2025 — Marina: Attempted murder arrest warrant service. Suspect wanted for a shooting in Seaside on August 31, 2025. Warrant served at suspect's Marina residence; suspect was not located. Equipment deployed: Command Post, BearCat, Drones.
• The BearCat was NOT deployed for any peaceful protests or demonstrations during the 2025 reporting period.
• All deployments involved high-risk incidents with armed or dangerous subjects, consistent with Policy 614 and Policy 707.

C. Patrol Rifles (23 Total) — Gov Code §7070(c)(10)
• Inventory: 6x Colt AR-15, 2x Colt M4 Carbine, 8x Bushmaster XM15-E2S, 2x Colt LE6940, 5x Colt CR6933-EPR SBR
• Classification: Standard-issue patrol rifles, exempt per §7070(c)(10). Included in this report for transparency purposes.
• Governing Policies: Policies 300 (Use of Force), 312 (Firearms), and 424 (Rapid Response and Deployment)
• No deployments requiring specific reporting beyond standard patrol use occurred during the 2025 reporting period.
• All officers assigned patrol rifles are qualified and current on required training (CA POST 16-hour patrol rifle course, 4 hours annually, annual qualification).

D. 40mm Less-Lethal Launchers (7 Total) — Gov Code §7070(c)(14) • Inventory: 6x Penn Arms 40mm Single Shot Launchers (L140-3/4), 1x Penn Arms 40mm Pump Action Multi-Shot Launcher (PGL65-40)
• Authorized Uses: Available as a less-lethal use-of-force option for situations requiring a measured response at distance
• Governing Policies: Policies 312 (Firearms) and 308 (Control Devices and Techniques) • No reportable deployments in 2025.

E. BolaWrap 150 (1 Unit) — Gov Code §7070(c)(14)
• Description: Kevlar cord remote restraint device with an effective range of 10–25 feet • Authorized Uses: Remote restraint of subjects to prevent escalation; assigned to SRU vehicles
• Governing Policies: Policies 312 (Firearms) and 308 (Control Devices and Techniques) • No reportable deployments in 2025.

3. Summary of Complaints or Concerns

EXHIBIT A
7 Marina Police Department — AB 481 Annual Report 2025

The Marina Police Department received zero (0) complaints or concerns regarding military equipment during the 2025 reporting period. The public complaint process remains available via the following channels:
• Email: [email protected]
• Phone: (831) 884-1210
• Mail: Marina Police Department, 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, CA 93933 • In person at the Marina Police Department
• Online complaint form available on the City of Marina website

4. Internal Audits and Policy Compliance
An internal audit of all military equipment was conducted in accordance with Policy 707. No violations of the Military Equipment Use Policy were identified during the 2025 reporting period.

No corrective actions were required.

The audit verified the following:
• All equipment is accounted for and in serviceable condition. • All deployments were consistent with approved policies and authorized uses. • All personnel operating military equipment maintained current training certifications. • Inventory records are accurate and up to date.

5. Total Annual Costs
The following table summarizes the annual maintenance and operational costs for all military equipment maintained by the Marina Police Department during the 2025 reporting period:

Equipment Category Qty Annual
Maintenance
Funding Source Gov Code
UAS/Drones 4 $1,000 Department Budget §7070(c)(1)
Lenco BearCat (MPRSRU) 1 $1,000 PRVNT Funds §7070(c)(3) Colt AR-15 Rifles 6 $680 Department Budget §7070(c)(10) Colt M4 Carbines 2 $130 Department Budget §7070(c)(10)
Bushmaster XM15-E2S 8 $910 Department Budget §7070(c)(10) Colt LE6940 2 $230 Department Budget §7070(c)(10)
Colt CR6933-EPR SBR 5 $575 Department Budget §7070(c)(10) 40mm Single Shot Launchers 6 $200 Department Budget §7070(c)(14) 40mm Multi-Shot Launcher 1 $200 Department Budget §7070(c)(14) BolaWrap 150 1 $160 Department Budget §7070(c)(14)
TOTAL 36 $5,085

EXHIBIT A
8 Marina Police Department — AB 481 Annual Report 2025

6. Quantity Possessed
The following table provides a complete inventory of all military equipment maintained by the Marina Police Department as of December 31, 2025:

Category Model/Type Qty Gov Code Section
UAS/Drones DJI Mavic Mini 2 2 §7070(c)(1)
DJI Mavic Enterprise 1
DJI Mavic Air 2 1
Armored Vehicle Lenco BearCat 1 §7070(c)(3)
Patrol Rifles Colt AR-15 Semiautomatic 6 §7070(c)(10)
Colt M4 Carbine 2
Bushmaster XM15-E2S 8
Colt LE6940 2
Colt CR6933-EPR SBR 5
Less-Lethal Launchers Penn Arms 40mm Single
Shot
6 §7070(c)(14)
Penn Arms 40mm Multi-Shot 1
Remote Restraint BolaWrap 150 1 §7070(c)(14)
TOTAL 36

EXHIBIT A
9 Marina Police Department — AB 481 Annual Report 2025

7. Planned Acquisitions for 2026
The Marina Police Department requests City Council authorization for the following new equipment acquisitions in 2026:

1. Five (5) Mini UAS Drones
• Purpose: Modernization and redundancy for the existing drone fleet. • Existing drones will remain in service until failure; these units supplement the current inventory.
• No expansion of authorized uses. Operations governed by existing Policy 612 and Policy 707.
• Estimated cost: $10,000 plus tax combined.

2. One (1) Advanced Large Drone Platform
• Purpose: Public safety technology platform providing enhanced thermal imaging capability, extended flight time, improved wind resistance, and full night operations capability.
• This is a recurring operational program. The specific vendor, brand, and platform type are to be determined pending funding identification and vendor vetting. The Department seeks Council authorization to procure this program. Once the desired platform and revenue funding streams are identified, the Department will return to City Council for approval through the normal budget procurement process. • Justification: Significantly enhances rural/wildland search, disaster response, and tactical awareness at a fraction of the cost of helicopter deployment ($2,500–$5,000/hour). Also eliminates the Department's reliance on surrounding police and fire agencies for drone support during operations.

3. One (1) Multi-40mm Less-Lethal Launcher
• Purpose: Increase availability of less-lethal response options for patrol and tactical operations.
• Same type, training, and policy as existing multi-shot launcher in inventory.

4. Six (6) Rifle Suppressors
• Purpose: Hearing protection devices for officers; reduces blast pressure from approximately 165 dB to 130–135 dB.
• Enhances tactical communication by reducing noise interference. • No change to use-of-force policy or authorized uses of associated firearms.

5. Four (4) Patrol Rifles (Colt M4 Carbine)
• Four (4) Colt M4 Carbines at $2,500 per rifle ($10,000 total). Annual maintenance: $130 per rifle ($520 total). Supplement the Department's aging patrol rifle inventory. • Existing rifles remain in service. Same caliber, same training requirements, same governing policies.

8. Community Engagement
The required community engagement meeting was conducted in compliance with Government Code §7072. The meeting was well-publicized and conveniently located to facilitate public

EXHIBIT A
10 Marina Police Department — AB 481 Annual Report 2025

participation. The Marina Police Department remains committed to transparency regarding its military equipment program and welcomes ongoing community input.

9. Conclusion
The Marina Police Department remains in full compliance with Assembly Bill 481 and Policy 707. All military equipment was used in accordance with approved policies, with appropriate training and oversight throughout the 2025 reporting period. The Department recommends continued authorization of all currently approved equipment and requests City Council approval for the additional items detailed in Section 7.

Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________
Chief of Police
Marina Police Department
211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, CA 93933

EXHIBIT A
11 MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Annual Military Equipment Report
Calendar Year 2026
Pursuant to California Government Code §7070–7075 (Assembly Bill 481) Request for Continued Authorization and New Equipment Approval

EXHIBIT B
12 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

1. Introduction
This report is submitted to the Marina City Council in compliance with California Government Code §7070–7075 (Assembly Bill 481), which requires law enforcement agencies to obtain governing body approval for the funding, acquisition, and use of military equipment, and to submit annual reports demonstrating compliance.

This 2026 Annual Military Equipment Report serves two purposes:

1. To confirm the ongoing compliance, necessity, and authorized status of all existing military equipment in the Marina Police Department’s inventory; and

2. To present five (5) new equipment requests for City Council consideration and approval.

Key facts regarding the Marina Police Department’s military equipment program:
• The Marina Police Department does not participate in the Department of Defense 1033 Program.
• No equipment in the Department’s inventory was designed or intended for battlefield use.
• All military equipment is governed by Marina PD Policy 707 (Military Equipment), adopted August 24, 2023.
• The Marina Police Department is a member agency of the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit (MPRSRU).
• This document is publicly available on the City of Marina and Marina Police Department websites as required by law.

2. Existing Equipment Status
All military equipment currently authorized by the Marina City Council remains in compliance with Policy 707 and all applicable provisions of Government Code §7070– 7075. The Department requests continued authorization for all existing equipment.

Equipment Category Qty Status Compliance
UAS/Drones (DJI fleet) 4 Operational Compliant
Lenco BearCat (MPRSRU) 1 Operational Compliant
Colt AR-15 Rifles 6 Operational Compliant
Colt M4 Carbines 2 Operational Compliant
Bushmaster XM15-E2S 8 Operational Compliant
Colt LE6940 2 Operational Compliant
Colt CR6933-EPR SBR 5 Operational Compliant

EXHIBIT B
13 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

Equipment Category Qty Status Compliance
40mm Single Shot
Launchers
6 Operational Compliant
40mm Multi-Shot Launcher 1 Operational Compliant
BolaWrap 150 1 Operational Compliant

Total existing inventory: 36 items across 5 equipment categories.

All equipment underwent internal audit in accordance with Policy 707. No policy violations were identified. All personnel operating military equipment maintain current training certifications. Zero complaints were received from the public regarding military equipment during the prior reporting period.

3. 2026 New Equipment Requests
The Marina Police Department requests City Council authorization for the following five (5) new equipment items or programs. Each request includes all information required by Government Code §7071.

3.1 Five (5) Mini UAS Drones — Gov Code §7070(c)(1)
Description, Quantity, and Capabilities
• Quantity: Five (5) small unmanned aerial systems (mini drones). • Capabilities: High-definition aerial video and photography, real-time streaming to command post, GPS waypoint navigation.
• Expected Lifespan: 5 years per unit.
• Manufacturer Description: Compact, lightweight drone platforms designed for commercial and public safety aerial observation.

Purpose and Authorized Uses
• Modernization and redundancy for the existing drone fleet (5 units, aging). • Authorized uses remain identical to existing UAS: search and rescue, suspect apprehension support, scene documentation, tactical operations support, disaster assessment.
• No expansion of authorized uses. All operations governed by Policy 612 (UAS Operations) and Policy 707 (Military Equipment).

Fiscal Impact
• Initial acquisition cost: $10,000 plus tax combined.
• Estimated annual maintenance/operating cost: ~$1,000. • Funding source: Department Budget.

Legal and Procedural Rules

EXHIBIT B
14 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

• Governed by Marina PD Policy 612 (UAS Operations) and Policy 707 (Military Equipment).
• All flights conducted under FAA Part 107 regulations with appropriate waivers/COAs.
• Deployment authorization consistent with existing UAS policies.

Training Requirements
• FAA Remote Pilot Certificate (Part 107) required for all operators. • Internal department UAS training program.
• FAA Certificate of Authorization (COA) maintained as required.

Compliance Mechanisms
• All flights logged and subject to supervisory review. • Annual internal audit per Policy 707.
• Annual report to City Council.
• Public complaint process available.

3.2 One (1) Advanced Large Drone Platform — Gov Code §7070(c)(1) Description, Quantity, and Capabilities
• Quantity: One (1) advanced large unmanned aerial system (public safety technology platform).
• Capabilities: Enhanced thermal imaging, extended flight time (45+ minutes), improved wind resistance, full night operations capability, high-resolution optical and infrared cameras, advanced GPS and autonomous flight modes. • The Department seeks policy authorization pursuant to AB 481 to include this enhanced UAS capability within its approved equipment inventory. This request does not seek approval of a specific vendor or financial commitment at this time.

The specific vendor, brand, and platform type are to be determined pending completion of funding identification and vendor vetting, allowing the Department to evaluate competitive options and evolving technology. The Department will return to City Council with a recommended vendor, detailed cost information, identified funding sources, and any required budget actions for full Council review and approval prior to acquisition. This approach preserves the Council’s fiscal oversight authority while ensuring compliance with AB 481 requirements. • Expected Lifespan: Airframe 3–5 years; program is recurring.

Purpose and Authorized Uses
• Enhanced rural and wildland search and rescue operations in Marina’s coastal and agricultural terrain.
• Disaster response and damage assessment (earthquake, fire, flooding). • Tactical overwatch during critical incidents, improving officer and community safety.

EXHIBIT B
15 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

• Nighttime operations where current drone fleet capabilities are limited. • Cost comparison: A single helicopter deployment costs approximately $2,500– $5,000 per hour. This drone platform provides comparable or superior aerial observation capabilities at a fraction of the recurring cost, with immediate availability and no pilot crew scheduling requirements. • Eliminates the Department’s current reliance on surrounding police and fire agencies to provide drone support during Marina operations.

Fiscal Impact
• Initial acquisition cost: To be determined.
• Annual program cost: To be determined. This is a recurring operational program covering FAA licensing, pilot certification, ongoing training, maintenance, software/licensing, and equipment replacement. Final vendor selection, pricing, and long-term cost structure are currently being evaluated to ensure the most effective and fiscally responsible solution for the City. The Department will return to City Council with detailed cost information and identified funding sources for approval prior to acquisition.
• Funding source: Department Budget.
• This platform represents a cost-effective alternative to contracted helicopter or manned aircraft services and eliminates reliance on mutual aid drone support from neighboring agencies.

Legal and Procedural Rules
• Governed by Marina PD Policy 612 (UAS Operations) and Policy 707 (Military Equipment).
• All operations conducted under FAA Part 107 regulations with appropriate waivers for night and beyond-visual-line-of-sight operations as authorized.

Training Requirements
• FAA Remote Pilot Certificate (Part 107) with advanced endorsements. • Manufacturer-specific platform training and certification. • Thermal imaging interpretation training.
• Night operations qualification.
• Ongoing proficiency training as required.

Compliance Mechanisms
• All flights logged with mission type, duration, location, and authorization. • Supervisory review of all deployments.
• Annual internal audit per Policy 707.
• Annual report to City Council with deployment data.
• Public complaint process available.

3.3 One (1) Multi-40mm Less-Lethal Launcher — Gov Code §7070(c)(14)

EXHIBIT B
16 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

Description, Quantity, and Capabilities
• Quantity: One (1) Penn Arms 40mm Pump Action Multi-Shot Launcher (PGL65- 40) or equivalent.
• Capabilities: Fires multiple 40mm less-lethal munitions (foam, sponge, or chemical agent rounds) without reloading, providing sustained less-lethal response capability.
• Expected Lifespan: 15 years.

Purpose and Authorized Uses
• Increase availability of less-lethal force options for patrol and tactical operations. • Authorized uses: Situations where a measured, less-lethal response at distance is appropriate, consistent with Policies 308 and 312.
• Provides an additional unit to ensure less-lethal capability is available across shifts and deployments.

Fiscal Impact
• Initial acquisition cost: Approximately $2,000.
• Estimated annual maintenance cost: ~$200.
• Funding source: Department Budget.

Legal and Procedural Rules
• Governed by Marina PD Policy 308 (Control Devices and Techniques), Policy 312 (Firearms), and Policy 707 (Military Equipment).
• All uses subject to use-of-force reporting and review procedures.

Training Requirements
• 2 hours initial training.
• 2 hours refresher training every 2 years.
• All operators must demonstrate proficiency before deployment authorization.

Compliance Mechanisms
• All deployments logged and reviewed by supervisory staff. • Annual internal audit per Policy 707.
• Use-of-force reporting for each deployment.

3.4 Six (6) Rifle Suppressors — Gov Code §7070(c)(14)
Description, Quantity, and Capabilities
• Quantity: Six (6) rifle-mounted sound suppressors (hearing protection devices). • Capabilities: Reduces the sound signature of rifle fire from approximately 165 dB (unsuppressed) to approximately 130–135 dB (suppressed). This remains well above conversational volume and does NOT render the firearm silent. • Expected Lifespan: 15+ years with proper maintenance.

EXHIBIT B
17 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

• Important clarification: A suppressor is a hearing protection device, NOT a “silencer.” Suppressed firearms remain clearly audible. The device reduces blast overpressure that causes permanent hearing damage to officers, bystanders, and subjects.

Purpose and Authorized Uses
• Primary purpose: Protecting officer hearing during training and operational use of patrol rifles.
• Reducing blast pressure exposure for nearby civilians and bystanders during critical incidents.
• Enhancing tactical communication by reducing noise interference — officers can hear commands, radio transmissions, and verbal warnings more effectively. • No change to use-of-force policy or authorized uses of associated firearms. The suppressor does not change when, why, or how a rifle may be used. • No increase in lethality. The device affects sound only, not projectile performance.

Fiscal Impact
• Initial acquisition cost: Approximately $6,000 (6 units). • Estimated annual maintenance cost: ~$300.
• Funding source: Department Budget.

Legal and Procedural Rules
• Governed by Marina PD Policy 300 (Use of Force), Policy 312 (Firearms), and Policy 707 (Military Equipment).
• Suppressors are legal for law enforcement use under federal and California state law.
• Registration and compliance with National Firearms Act (NFA) requirements. • No change to existing use-of-force authorization or reporting requirements.

Training Requirements
• Familiarization training for all officers assigned suppressors. • Integration into existing patrol rifle qualification courses. • Ongoing proficiency maintained through standard firearms training schedule.

Compliance Mechanisms
• Inventory tracked and audited per Policy 707.
• NFA registration maintained for each unit.
• Annual internal audit per Policy 707.

3.5 Four (4) Patrol Rifles (Colt M4 Carbine) — Gov Code §7070(c)(10) Description, Quantity, and Capabilities
• Quantity: Four (4) Colt M4 Carbines.

EXHIBIT B
18 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

• Type: Colt M4 Carbine, semiautomatic, .223/5.56mm caliber, consistent with existing inventory.
• Capabilities: Standard law enforcement patrol rifle capabilities — same as currently authorized rifles.
• Expected Lifespan: 15 years.
• Note: Patrol rifles in this caliber are standard-issue and exempt per §7070(c)(10).

Included in this request for full transparency.

Purpose and Authorized Uses
• Supplement the Department’s aging patrol rifle inventory, much of which is approximately 20 years old.
• Existing rifles remain in service; new acquisitions address reliability concerns with aging platforms.
• Same caliber, same training requirements, same governing policies as current inventory.
• Authorized uses: Consistent with Policies 300 (Use of Force), 312 (Firearms), and 424 (Rapid Response and Deployment).

Fiscal Impact
• Initial acquisition cost: $10,000 ($2,500 per rifle × 4 rifles). • Annual maintenance cost: $520 ($130 per rifle × 4 rifles). • Funding source: Department Budget.

Legal and Procedural Rules
• Governed by Marina PD Policy 300 (Use of Force), Policy 312 (Firearms), Policy 424 (Rapid Response and Deployment), and Policy 707 (Military Equipment).

Training Requirements
• CA POST 16-hour patrol rifle course (initial).
• 4 hours annual refresher training.
• Annual qualification required.

Compliance Mechanisms
• Inventory tracked and audited per Policy 707.
• All deployments subject to standard use-of-force reporting. • Annual report to City Council.

4. Fiscal Impact Summary
The following table summarizes the fiscal impact of all proposed new equipment for 2026:

EXHIBIT B
19 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

New Equipment Qty Initial Cost Annual
Cost
Funding Source
Mini UAS Drones 5 $10,000 +
tax
~$1,000 Department Budget
Advanced Large
Drone Platform
1 TBD TBD Department Budget
Multi-40mm Less-
Lethal Launcher
1 ~$2,000 ~$200 Department Budget
Rifle Suppressors 6 ~$6,000 ~$300 Department Budget
Patrol Rifles (Colt
M4)
4 $10,000 $520 Department Budget

TOTAL NEW
ITEMS
~$28,000+ ~$2,020 +
drone TBD

Existing equipment annual maintenance costs remain at $5,085 per year as detailed in the 2025 Annual Report. Total combined annual cost for existing and new equipment (excluding one-time acquisition costs and the advanced drone platform) is estimated at $7,105. The advanced large drone platform annual cost will be determined and brought back to City Council for approval through the normal budget process.

5. Required Council Findings
Government Code §7071 requires the City Council to make specific findings before approving military equipment. The Department respectfully submits the following information to support these findings:

Finding 1: The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. • UAS/Drones: No reasonable alternative provides the aerial perspective, thermal imaging, and rapid deployment capability needed for search and rescue, scene documentation, and tactical awareness. The advanced drone platform replaces the need for costly helicopter deployments at ~$2,500–$5,000/hour. • BearCat: No alternative vehicle provides the ballistic protection necessary to safely extract civilians and approach armed, barricaded subjects. The 2025 deployment data demonstrates 9 high-risk incidents where the BearCat protected both officers and community members.
• Less-Lethal Launchers: These devices provide a critical intermediate force option that reduces the likelihood of lethal force encounters. • Suppressors: No alternative hearing protection device can reduce blast overpressure while maintaining the officer’s ability to communicate, hear commands, and respond to the environment.

EXHIBIT B
20 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

• Patrol Rifles: Standard law enforcement tools required for response to active threats. Aging inventory must be replaced to ensure reliability.

Finding 2: The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
• Policy 707 governs all military equipment with specific authorized uses, prohibited uses, training requirements, and oversight mechanisms. • No equipment is authorized for use in connection with peaceful protests or demonstrations.
• All uses are subject to use-of-force reporting, supervisory review, and internal audit.

Finding 3: If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives.
• The advanced drone program, once procured, will replace the need for helicopter services costing $2,500–$5,000 per hour and eliminate reliance on mutual aid drone support from neighboring agencies, representing significant recurring cost savings.
• Suppressors ($6,000) prevent hearing damage claims and workers’ compensation costs that far exceed the acquisition cost. • All other items are competitively priced within standard law enforcement procurement channels.

Finding 4: Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy.
• As detailed in the Corrected 2025 Annual Report, all military equipment was used in accordance with approved policies during the prior reporting period. • Zero policy violations were identified. Zero complaints were received. • All personnel maintained current training certifications.

6. Policy Safeguards
The Marina Police Department maintains the following safeguards to ensure responsible military equipment use and public accountability:
• Policy 707 (Military Equipment): Comprehensive policy governing acquisition, use, training, reporting, and community engagement for all military equipment.

Adopted August 24, 2023.
• Training Requirements: All personnel operating military equipment must complete initial training and maintain ongoing proficiency certifications specific to each equipment type.
• Deployment Authorization: Military equipment deployments require appropriate supervisory authorization consistent with departmental policies. • Use-of-Force Reporting: All force applications involving military equipment are subject to department use-of-force reporting and review procedures.

EXHIBIT B
21 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

• Internal Audit: Annual internal audit of all military equipment, deployment records, training compliance, and inventory accuracy per Policy 707. • Annual Reporting: Annual report to City Council with full statutory disclosures per Government Code §7072.
• Community Engagement: Annual public meeting to present the military equipment report and receive community input, as required by law. • Public Complaint Process: Complaints regarding military equipment may be submitted via email ([email protected]), phone (831-884- 1210), mail, in person, or online form.
• Public Transparency: This report, the Military Equipment Use Policy, and the approved equipment list are posted on the City of Marina and Marina Police Department websites as required by Government Code §7071(d). • Prohibited Uses: Military equipment shall not be used for the purpose of suppressing lawful First Amendment activity, nor in any manner that violates any person’s civil rights or civil liberties.

7. Recommendation
The Marina Police Department respectfully recommends that the Marina City Council:

3. Continue authorization for all existing military equipment currently in the Department’s inventory, as detailed in Section 2 of this report;

4. Approve the acquisition and use of the five (5) new equipment items/programs detailed in Section 3 of this report;

5. Make the required findings under Government Code §7071 as supported by the information provided in Section 5 of this report; and

6. Direct that this report, the Military Equipment Use Policy, and the updated equipment list be posted on the City of Marina website as required by law.

The Department remains committed to transparency, accountability, and responsible stewardship of all equipment entrusted to it by the community. All military equipment serves the singular purpose of enhancing public safety and protecting the lives of community members and officers.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________________________

Chief of Police
Marina Police Department

EXHIBIT B
22 Marina Police Department — Annual Military Equipment Report 2026

211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, CA 93933

EXHIBIT B
23 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 1 of 11 Policy 707
Marina Police Department
Marina Police Department Policy Manual
Military Equipment
707.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The Marina Police Department does not participate in the 1033 Program and has not obtained any military equipment from the military, nor does it possess any equipment that was designed for military use. However, California Government Code § 7071(b) requires that law enforcement agencies submit a proposed Military Equipment Use Policy to their governing body for approval.

The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of "military equipment" (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072). This policy is provided to fulfill the obligations set forth in Assembly Bill 481. These obligations include, but are not limited to, seeking approval on specific items deemed to be military equipment, and requirements related to the compliance, annual reporting, cataloging, and complaints regarding these items.
707.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.

Military equipment – Any of a wide variety of items as defined by California Government Code section 7070, subsections (c)(1) through (c)(16), as listed below:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this subdivision. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. However, unarmored all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorized dirt bikes are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
• Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion.
• Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.
• Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, or a handled arm ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this subdivision. • Firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or state agency. • Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.

EXHIBIT C
24 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 2 of 11 • TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).
• Kinetic energy weapons and munitions, such as 40mm projectile launchers, "bean bag", rubber bullet, and specialty impact (SIM) weapons.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
• Notwithstanding the above, "military equipment" does not include general equipment not designated as prohibited or controlled by the federal Defense Logistics Agency.

Military Equipment Use Policy - California Government Code § 7070(d) describes a Military Use Equipment as a publicly released, written document that includes, at a minimum the following:
• A description of each type of Military Equipment, the quantity sought, its capabilities expected lifespan, and product descriptions from the manufacturer of the Military Equipment. The purposes and authorized uses for which the law enforcement agency or the state agency proposes to use each type of Military Equipment.
• The fiscal impact of each type of Military Equipment, including the initial costs of obtaining the equipment and estimated annual costs of maintaining the equipment. • The legal and procedural rules that govern each authorized use. • The training, including any course required by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, that must be completed before any officer, agent, or employee of the law enforcement agency or the state agency is allowed to use each specific type of Military Equipment to ensure the full protection of the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties and full adherence to the Military Equipment use policy.
• The mechanisms to ensure compliance with the Military Equipment use policy, including which independent persons or entities have oversight authority, and, if applicable, what legally enforceable sanctions are put in place for violations of the policy. • For a law enforcement agency, the procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of Military Equipment, and how the law enforcement agency will ensure that each complaint, concern, or question receives a response in a timely manner.
707.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Marina Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. It is also the policy of the Marina Police Department that there are legally enforceable safeguards, including transparency, oversight and accountability measures in place to protect the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties before military equipment is funded, acquired, or used.

The acquisitions of military equipment and its deployment in our communities may impact the public's safety and welfare. The public has a right to know about any funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment by local government officials, as well as a right to participate in any government agency's decision to fund, acquire, or use such equipment. Decisions regarding whether and how military equipment is funded, acquired, or used should give strong consideration to the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties, and should be based on meaningful public input. 707.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.

EXHIBIT C
25 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 3 of 11 (b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Marina Police Department (Government Code § 7071).
(e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department's funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072). (g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.

EXHIBIT C
26 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 4 of 11 707.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Department, as amended to include 2026 additions approved by the governing body.

Note: Items marked [NEW — 2026] reflect 2026 amendments added pursuant to Government Code § 7071.

Equipment Category Description / Model Qty Gov. Code Status UAS/Drones DJI Mavic Mini 2 2 §7070(c)(1)
UAS/Drones DJI Mavic Enterprise 1 §7070(c)(1)
UAS/Drones DJI Mavic Air 2 1 §7070(c)(1)
Armored Vehicle Lenco BearCat (MPRSRU) 1 §7070(c)(3)
Patrol Rifles Colt AR-15 Semiautomatic 6 §7070(c)(10)
Patrol Rifles Colt M4 Carbine 2 §7070(c)(10)
Patrol Rifles Bushmaster XM15-E2S 8 §7070(c)(10)
Patrol Rifles Colt LE6940 2 §7070(c)(10)
Patrol Rifles Colt CR6933-EPR SBR 5 §7070(c)(10)
Less-Lethal Launchers Penn Arms 40mm Single Shot
(L140-3/4)
6 §7070(c)(14)
Less-Lethal Launchers Penn Arms 40mm Multi-Shot
(PGL65-40)
1 §7070(c)(14)
Remote Restraint BolaWrap 150 1 §7070(c)(14)
2026 AMENDMENTS — NEW EQUIPMENT ADDITIONS
UAS/Drones Mini UAS Drones (various) 5 §7070(c)(1) [NEW — 2026] UAS/Drones Advanced Large Drone Platform 1 §7070(c)(1) [NEW — 2026] Less-Lethal Launchers Penn Arms 40mm Multi-Shot
(PGL65-40)
1 §7070(c)(14) [NEW — 2026]
Rifle Suppressors Rifle-mounted sound
suppressors
6 §7070(c)(14) [NEW — 2026]
Patrol Rifles Colt M4 Carbine 4 §7070(c)(10) [NEW — 2026]

EXHIBIT C
27 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 5 of 11 707.4.1 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND AUTHORIZED USES
The following provides descriptions, authorized uses, fiscal impact, training requirements, and governing policies for each category of military equipment in the Department's inventory, as required by Government Code § 7070(d).

A. UAS/Drones (Existing Fleet — 4 Units) — Gov Code §7070(c)(1) • Inventory: 2x DJI Mavic Mini 2, 1x DJI Mavic Enterprise, 1x DJI Mavic Air 2 • Purpose: Unmanned aerial vehicles used for search and rescue operations, suspect apprehension support, crime scene documentation, tactical operations support, and disaster assessment.
• Authorized Uses: Deployment consistent with Marina PD Policy 612 (UAS Operations) and Policy 707 (Military Equipment). Drones shall not be used for warrantless surveillance or general monitoring.
• Governing Policies: Policy 612 (UAS Operations), Policy 707 (Military Equipment) • Training: FAA Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate required for all operators. Department-specific UAS training and qualification.
• Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance cost approximately $1,000 total ($250/unit). Funded by Department Budget.
• Expected Lifespan: Approximately 3–5 years per unit.

Five (5) Mini UAS Drones [NEW — 2026] — Gov Code §7070(c)(1) • Purpose: Modernization and redundancy for the existing drone fleet. Existing drones will remain in service until failure; these units supplement the current inventory. • Authorized Uses: Same authorized uses as existing UAS fleet. No expansion of authorized uses.

Operations governed by existing Policy 612 and Policy 707. • Governing Policies: Policy 612 (UAS Operations), Policy 707 (Military Equipment) • Training: FAA Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate. Department-specific UAS training. • Fiscal Impact: Estimated one-time acquisition cost of $10,000 plus tax combined ($2,000 per unit). Annual maintenance costs TBD based on selected models. • Expected Lifespan: Approximately 3–5 years per unit.

One (1) Advanced Large Drone Platform [NEW — 2026] — Gov Code §7070(c)(1) • Purpose: Public safety technology platform providing enhanced thermal imaging capability, extended flight time, improved wind resistance, and full night operations capability. This platform significantly enhances rural/wildland search, disaster response, and tactical awareness at a fraction of the cost of helicopter deployment ($2,500–$5,000/hour), and eliminates the Department's reliance on surrounding police and fire agencies for drone support during operations.
• This is a recurring operational program. The specific vendor, brand, and platform type are to be determined pending funding identification and vendor vetting. The Department seeks Council authorization under AB 481 to include this capability in the approved equipment inventory. This approval constitutes policy authorization only — it is not a vendor selection or financial commitment. Once the desired platform and revenue funding streams are identified, the Department will return to City Council through the normal budget procurement process with:

1. A recommended vendor and platform

2. Detailed cost information

3. Identified funding sources

4. Any required budget actions for Council review and approval • This approach preserves the City Council's fiscal oversight authority while enabling the Department to begin the vetting and procurement planning process.

EXHIBIT C
28 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 6 of 11 • Authorized Uses: Same authorized uses as existing UAS fleet — search and rescue, tactical operations support, crime scene documentation, disaster assessment. No expansion of authorized uses.
• Governing Policies: Policy 612 (UAS Operations), Policy 707 (Military Equipment) • Training: FAA Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate, advanced UAS pilot certification, manufacturer- specific training, and maintenance certification as applicable to the selected platform. • Fiscal Impact: To be determined. The Department will present detailed cost information to City Council once the vendor vetting process is complete and funding sources are identified.

B. MPRSRU Rescue Vehicle / Lenco BearCat — Gov Code §7070(c)(3) • Inventory: 1x Lenco BearCat Armored Vehicle (registered to Marina PD; shared MPRSRU asset) • Purpose: Armored rescue vehicle providing ballistic protection for officers and civilians during critical incidents.
• Authorized Uses: Critical incident response including hostage situations, barricaded subjects, active shooter incidents, and high-risk warrant service. The BearCat shall not be deployed for peaceful protests or demonstrations.
• Governing Policies: Policy 614 (High Risk Operations), Policy 707 (Military Equipment) • Training: All operators must complete MPRSRU vehicle operations training and maintain current certification.
• Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance cost approximately $1,000. Funded by PRVNT funds (not City general fund). The BearCat cost is included in the Department's $5,085 total annual maintenance figure because the Department is responsible for the vehicle.

EXHIBIT C
29 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 7 of 11 C. Patrol Rifles (23 Total, Existing) — Gov Code §7070(c)(10) • Inventory: 6x Colt AR-15, 2x Colt M4 Carbine, 8x Bushmaster XM15-E2S, 2x Colt LE6940, 5x Colt CR6933-EPR SBR
• Classification: Standard-issue patrol rifles, exempt per §7070(c)(10). Included in this policy for transparency purposes.
• Authorized Uses: Standard patrol deployment consistent with Policies 300 (Use of Force), 312 (Firearms), and 424 (Rapid Response and Deployment).
• Governing Policies: Policy 300 (Use of Force), Policy 312 (Firearms), Policy 424 (Rapid Response and Deployment)
• Training: CA POST 16-hour patrol rifle course, 4 hours annual in-service training, annual qualification.
• Fiscal Impact: Combined annual maintenance $2,525 (varies by model, approximately $65– $115/unit). Funded by Department Budget.

Four (4) Patrol Rifles — Colt M4 Carbine [NEW — 2026] — Gov Code §7070(c)(10) • Purpose: Supplement the Department's aging patrol rifle inventory. Some current rifles are approaching 20 years of service. This is a phased modernization — not an expansion of capability. Same caliber, same training requirements, same governing policies. • Authorized Uses: Same as existing patrol rifles. No expansion of use authority. No change to use- of-force policy.
• Governing Policies: Policy 300 (Use of Force), Policy 312 (Firearms), Policy 424 (Rapid Response and Deployment)
• Training: CA POST 16-hour patrol rifle course, 4 hours annual in-service training, annual qualification.
• Fiscal Impact: Four (4) Colt M4 Carbines at $2,500 per rifle ($10,000 total one-time). Annual maintenance: $130 per rifle ($520 total annually).

D. 40mm Less-Lethal Launchers (7 Total, Existing) — Gov Code §7070(c)(14) • Inventory: 6x Penn Arms 40mm Single Shot Launchers (L140-3/4), 1x Penn Arms 40mm Pump Action Multi-Shot Launcher (PGL65-40)
• Purpose: Less-lethal use-of-force option for situations requiring a measured response at distance. • Authorized Uses: Deployment as a less-lethal force option consistent with Policies 312 (Firearms) and 308 (Control Devices and Techniques).
• Governing Policies: Policy 312 (Firearms), Policy 308 (Control Devices and Techniques) • Training: Department-approved 40mm launcher training and qualification. • Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance cost approximately $400 combined. Funded by Department Budget.

One (1) Multi-40mm Less-Lethal Launcher [NEW — 2026] — Gov Code §7070(c)(14) • Purpose: Increase availability of less-lethal response options for patrol and tactical operations.

Same type, training, and policy as existing multi-shot launcher in inventory. • Fiscal Impact: Estimated acquisition cost approximately $2,000. Annual maintenance TBD.

E. BolaWrap 150 (1 Unit) — Gov Code §7070(c)(14)
• Description: Kevlar cord remote restraint device with an effective range of 10–25 feet. • Authorized Uses: Remote restraint of subjects to prevent escalation; assigned to SRU vehicles. • Governing Policies: Policy 312 (Firearms), Policy 308 (Control Devices and Techniques) • Training: Department-approved BolaWrap training.
• Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance cost approximately $160. Funded by Department Budget.

EXHIBIT C
30 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 8 of 11 F. Six (6) Rifle Suppressors [NEW — 2026] — Gov Code §7070(c)(14) • Purpose: Hearing protection devices for officers. Reduces blast pressure from approximately 165 dB to 130–135 dB. Enhances tactical communication by reducing noise interference. • Authorized Uses: Mounted on department-issued rifles during training and tactical operations. No change to use-of-force policy or authorized uses of associated firearms. No increase in lethality. • Governing Policies: Policy 312 (Firearms), Policy 707 (Military Equipment) • Training: Officers must be trained on suppressor installation, function, and maintenance prior to deployment.
• Fiscal Impact: Estimated acquisition cost approximately $6,000 combined (~$1,000 per unit).

Annual maintenance minimal.

EXHIBIT C
31 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 9 of 11 707.4.2 FISCAL SUMMARY
The following table summarizes the annual maintenance costs for existing equipment and estimated costs for 2026 new equipment additions:

Equipment Qty Est. Cost Funding Notes
UAS/Drones (existing) 4 $1,000 Dept Budget $250/unit
Lenco BearCat
(MPRSRU)
1 $1,000 PRVNT Funds Shared regional asset
Colt AR-15 Rifles 6 $680 Dept Budget $113/unit
Colt M4 Carbines
(existing)
2 $130 Dept Budget $65/unit
Bushmaster XM15-E2S 8 $910 Dept Budget $114/unit
Colt LE6940 2 $230 Dept Budget $115/unit
Colt CR6933-EPR SBR 5 $575 Dept Budget $115/unit
40mm Single Shot
Launchers
6 $200 Dept Budget $33/unit
40mm Multi-Shot
Launcher
1 $200 Dept Budget $200/unit
BolaWrap 150 1 $160 Dept Budget $160/unit
TOTAL (Existing) 36 $5,085
2026 NEW EQUIPMENT — ESTIMATED COSTS
Mini UAS Drones 5 $10,000 + tax TBD $2,000/unit one-time Advanced Large Drone
Platform
1 TBD TBD Recurring program
Multi-40mm Launcher 1 ~$2,000 TBD One-time acquisition
Rifle Suppressors 6 ~$6,000 TBD ~$1,000/unit one-time
Patrol Rifles – Colt M4 4 $10,000 TBD $2,500/rifle; $130/yr maint

Total Annual Maintenance (Existing Equipment): $5,085
Note: The $1,000 annual BearCat maintenance cost is funded through PRVNT funds, not the City general fund. It is included in the Department total because the Department is responsible for the vehicle.

EXHIBIT C
32 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 10 of 11 707.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department.
(e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 707.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment used by any member of this jurisdiction shall be approved for use and in accordance with this Department policy. Military equipment used by other jurisdictions that are providing aid to Marina Police Department shall comply with their respective military equipment use policies in rendering mutual aid.

The Marina Police Department is a participating member of the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit (MPRSRU) in collaboration with the other law enforcement agencies on the Monterey Peninsula. The MPRSRU provides capabilities to address specific law enforcement issues, such as active shooter incidents, hostage situations, barricaded subject incidents, etc. The Marina Police Department also collaborates and works with the Monterey County Sheriff's Office and other local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies that may be needed to aid the Marina Police Department. 707.6.1 USE IN EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES
Marina Police Department participates with the Peninsula Special Response Unit and works closely with local, county, state, and federal partners. In exigent circumstances and with the approval of the Chief of Police or designee, military equipment may be deployed from outside entities to promote the safety and security of community members. If the Police Department acquires, borrows, or uses military equipment in exigent circumstances, it will provide written notification of the acquisition or use to the City Council within 30 days following the commencement of such exigent circumstances, unless such information is confidential or privileged under local, state or federal law. 707.7 ANNUAL REPORT
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall submit a military equipment report to the City Council for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072). The Chief of Police or the

EXHIBIT C
33 Policy 707 — Military Equipment — Marina Police Department Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/08/24. Published with permission by Marina Police Department. Amended 2026. | Page 11 of 11 authorized designee shall also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year as required by Government Code § 7072 for each type of military equipment in department inventory. • A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use • A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment • The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response.
• The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report.
• The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. • If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment. 707.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
707.9 COMPLIANCE
The Marina Police Department is committed to responding to complaints, concerns, and questions received in a timely manner. Members of the public wishing to make a complaint, ask a question or express a concern can do so by any of the following means:
• Via email to: [email protected]
• Via phone call to: 831-884-1210
• Via mail sent to: Marina Police Department, 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, CA 93933 • Via in person by responding to the above address
• Via completing a complaint/inquiry form located on the departmental website

EXHIBIT C
34 ORDINANCE NO. 2026-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY (POLICY 707) OF

THE MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION AND USE OF ADDITIONAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2026 PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 7070-7075; AND RENEWING CHAPTER 9.26 OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, California Government Code §§7070 -7075, enacted through Assembly Bill 481, requires that a law enforcement agency obtain approval from its governing body, by ordinance, before funding, acquiring, or using military equipment, as defined by Government Code § 7070; and
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2023, the City Council of the City of Marina adopted Policy 707 (Military Equipment) for the Marina Police Department, establishing guidelines for the approval, acquisition, reporting, and use of military equipment in accordance with Government Code §7071; and
WHEREAS, Government Code §7072 requires the Marina Police Department to submit an annual military equipment report to the City Council for each type of military equipment approved, demonstrating compliance with the military equipment use policy; and WHEREAS, the Marina Police Department has submitted to the City Council the 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report (Corrected), covering the period January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025, demonstrating full compliance with AB 481 and Policy 707, including zero p olicy violations, zero complaints received, and all equipment accounted for and in serviceable condition; and
WHEREAS, the Marina Police Department has submitted to the City Council the 2026 Annual Military Equipment Report requesting authorization for the acquisition and use of five categories of additional military equipment: (1) five mini UAS drones; (2) one advanced large drone program; (3) one multi-40mm less-lethal launcher; (4) six rifle suppressors; and (5) four Colt M4 Carbine patrol rifles; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Military Equipment Use Policy, including the amendments authorizing the additional equipment, was posted on the City of Marina website and made available for public review at least 30 days prior to this public hearing, as required by Government Code §7071(d)(2); and
WHEREAS, an annual community engagement meeting was held in compliance with Government Code §7072 to present the annual military equipment report and receive community input; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the annual military equipment report, the proposed amendments to the Military Equipment Use Policy, all public testimony, and all written communications received.

EXHIBIT D
35 Ordinance No. 2026-
Page Two

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

The City Council hereby finds, based on the information presented in the 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report (Corrected), the 2026 Annual Military Equipment Report, and all testimony and evidence received, that:
(a) Each item of military equipment identified in the amended Military Equipment Use Policy (Policy 707) is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. (Government Code §7071(d)(1)(A)) (b) The proposed Military Equipment Use Policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. (Government Code §7071(d)(1)(B)) (c) The military equipment identified for acquisition is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective. (Government Code §7071(d)(1)(C))
(d) Prior military equipment use complied with the Military Equipment Use Policy, as demonstrated by the 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report showing zero policy violations, zero complaints, and full compliance with all training and deployment requirements. (Government Code §7071(d)(1)(D))

SECTION 2. APPROVAL OF AMENDED MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY.

The City Council hereby approves the amended Military Equipment Use Policy (Policy 707), attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, which includes authorization for the following additional military equipment:
(a) Five (5) Mini UAS Drones, at a combined acquisition cost of $10,000 plus tax, for modernization and redundancy of the drone fleet. (Government Code §7070(c)(1)) (b) One (1) Advanced Large Drone Program, a recurring operational program providing enhanced thermal imaging, extended flight time, and night operations capabilities, and replacing the need for helicopter deployments at $2,500 –$5,000 per hour. The specific vendor, brand, platform type, and cost are to be determined pending funding identification and vendor vetting. This authorization constitutes policy approval pursuant to Government Code §7071 to include this enhanced UAS capability within the Department’s approved equipment inventory; it does not constitute approval of a specific vendor or financial commitment. The Department shall return to City Council with a recommended vendor, detailed cost information, identified funding sources, and any required budg et actions for full Council review and approval prior to acquisition, preserving the Council’s fiscal oversight authority. (Government Code §7070(c)(1))
(c) One (1) Penn Arms 40mm Multi-Shot Less-Lethal Launcher (PGL65-40) or equivalent, at an approximate acquisition cost of $2,000, to increase less -lethal force option availability. (Government Code §7070(c)(14))
(d) Six (6) Rifle-Mounted Sound Suppressors, at an approximate acquisition cost of $6,000, serving as hearing protection devices for officers. (Government Code §7070(c)(14))

EXHIBIT D
36 (e) Four (4) Colt M4 Carbine Patrol Rifles, at an acquisition cost of $10,000 ($2,500 per rifle), to supplement the Department's aging patrol rifle inventory. Annual maintenance cost: $520 ($130 per rifle). (Government Code §7070(c)(10)) SECTION 3. CONTINUED AUTHORIZATION.

The City Council hereby continues authorization for all existing military equipment currently in the inventory of the Marina Police Department, as detailed in Section 2 of the 2026 Annual Military Equipment Report.

SECTION 4. RENEWAL OF CHAPTER 9.26 OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE .

Chapter 9.26 added to Title 9 of the Marina Municipal Code is renewed and to read as follows on the attached hereto: Chapter: 9.26: “Military Equipment” Use Ordnance.

SECTION 5. POSTING AND PUBLICATION.

The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance, the amended Military Equipment Use Policy, the 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report, and the 2026 Annual Military Equipment Report to be posted on the City of Marina website as required by Government Code §7071(d)(2).

SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof.

SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on the 7th day of April 2026, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting duly held on the 21st day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_______________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_______________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

EXHIBIT D
37 Chapter: 9.26
“Military Equipment” Use Ordnance

Sections:

9.26.010 Name of Ordinance

9.26.020 Purpose.

9.26.030 Definitions.

9.26.040 Military Equipment Use Policy Requirement

9.26.050 Use In Exigent Circumstances

9.26.060 Reports on the Use of Military Equipment.

9.26.070 Severability

9.26.010 Name of Ordinance.

A. This Ordinance shall be known as the Military Equipment Use Ordinance.

9.26.020 Purpose.

A. The purpose of this ordinance is to ensure the Police Department’s compliance with California AB 481, which requires California law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the law enforcement agency’s governing body, by adoption of a military equipment use policy, as specified, by ordinance at a regular meeting prior to taking actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment. This ordinance also requires approval for the continued use of military equipment acquired prior to January 1, 2022. This ordinance also allows the governing body to approve the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it determines that the military equipment meets specified standards. (California Government Codes § 7070, § 7071, § 7072.)

9.26.030 Definitions.

A. “Military equipment” means the following:

(1) Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.

(2) Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

(3) High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), commonly referred to as Humvees, two and one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached.

However, unarmored all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorized dirt bikes are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

(4) Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion.

(5) Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.

EXHIBIT D
38 (6) Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. (7) Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
(8) Firearms of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotguns are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
(9) Ammunition of .50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotgun ammunition is specifically excluded from this subdivision. (10) Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including assault weapons as defined in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard issue service weapons and ammunition of less than .50 caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a state agency. (11) Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.
(12) “Flashbang” grenades and explosive breaching tools, “tear gas,” and “pepper balls,” excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray. (13) Taser Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and the Long- Range Acoustic Device (LRAD).
(14) The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions:
40 mm projectile launchers, “bean bag,” rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons.
(15) Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
(16) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (15), “military equipment” does not include general equipment not designated as prohibited or controlled by the federal Defense Logistics Agency.

B. “City” means any department, agency, bureau, and/or subordinate division of the City of Marina,
C. “Police Department” means any division, section, bureau, employee, volunteer and/or contractor of the Marina Police Department.

D. “City Council” means the governing body that is the Marina City Council.

E. “Military Equipment Use Policy” means a publicly released, written document governing the use of military equipment by the Police Department that addresses, at a minimum, all of the following:

EXHIBIT D
39 (1) A description of each type of military equipment, the quantity sought, its capabilities, expected lifespan, and product descriptions from the manufacturer of the military equipment.

(2) The purposes and authorized uses for which the Police Department proposes to use each type of military equipment.

(3) The fiscal impact of each type of military equipment, including the initial costs of obtaining the equipment and estimated annual costs of maintaining the equipment.

(4) The legal and procedural rules that govern each authorized use.

(5) The training, including any course required by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, that must be completed before any officer, agent, or employee of the Police Department allowed to use each specific type of military equipment to ensure the full protection of the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties and full adherence to the military equipment use policy.

(6) The mechanisms to ensure compliance with the military equipment use policy, including which independent persons or entities have oversight authority, and, if applicable, what legally enforceable sanctions are put in place for violations of the policy.

(7) For the Police Department procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of military equipment, and how the Police Department will ensure that each complaint, concern, or question receives a response in a timely manner. (California Government Codes § 7070.)

9.26.040 Military Equipment Use Policy Requirement.

A. The Police Department shall obtain approval of the City Council, by an ordinance adopting a Military Equipment Use Policy at a regular meeting of the City Council held pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code) prior to engaging in any of the following:

(1) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to Section 2576a of Title 10 of the United States Code.

(2) Seeking funds for military equipment, including, but not limited to, applying for a grant, soliciting, or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.

(3) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.

(4) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the territorial jurisdiction of the City of Marina.

EXHIBIT D
40 (5) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the City Council pursuant to this chapter.

(6) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of, military equipment.

(7) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided by this section.

B. No later than May 1, 2022, if seeking to continue the use of any Military Equipment that was acquired prior to January 1, 2022, the Marina Police Department shall commence a City Council approval process in accordance with this section. If the City Council does not approve the continuing use of military equipment, including by adoption pursuant to this subdivision of a military equipment use policy submitted within 180 days of submission of the proposed military equipment use policy to the City Council, the Marina Police Department shall cease its use of the military equipment until it receives the approval of the City Council in accordance with this section.

C. In seeking the approval of the governing body, the Police Department shall submit a proposed military equipment use policy to the City Council and make those documents available on the Police Department’s internet website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue.

D. The City Council shall only approve a military equipment use policy pursuant to this chapter if it determines all of the following:

(1) The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

(2) The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties
.
(3) If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

(4) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

E. The City Council shall review this ordinance at least annually and vote on whether to renew it at a regular meeting held pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code).

9.26.050 Use in Exigent Circumstances

EXHIBIT D
41 A. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Chapter, the Police Department may acquire, borrow and/or use Military Equipment in Exigent Circumstances without following the requirements of this ordinance.

B. If the Police Department acquires, borrows, and/or uses Military Equipment in Exigent Circumstances, in accordance with this section, it must take all of the following actions:

(1) Provide written notice of that acquisition or use to the City Council within 30 days following the commencement of such Exigent Circumstances, unless such information is confidential or privileged under local, state, or federal law.

(2) If it is anticipated that the use will continue beyond the Exigent Circumstance, submit a proposed amended Military Equipment Use Policy to the City Council within 90 days following the borrowing, acquisition and/or use, and receive approval, as applicable, from the City Council.

(3) Include the Military Equipment in the Police Department’s next annual Military Equipment Report.

9.26.060 Reports on the Use of Military Equipment

A. The Police Department shall submit to City Council an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by City Council within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use.

B. The Police Department shall also make each annual military equipment report available on its internet website for as long as the military equipment is available for use.

C. The annual military equipment report shall, at a minimum, include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment:

(1) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use.

(2) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment.

(3) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response.

(4) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report.

(5) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment.

(6) If the Police Department intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.

EXHIBIT D
42 D. Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing an annual military equipment report pursuant to this section, the Police Department shall hold at least one well -publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the general pub lic may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the Police Department’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment. (California Government Codes § 7072 (a)

E. The City Council shall determine, based on the annual military equipment report submitted by the Marina Police Department whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval. In order to facilitate public participation, any proposed or final Military Equipment Use Policy shall be made publicly available on the internet website of the Marina Police Department for as long as the Military equipment is available for use. (California Government Codes § 7071 (a) (1)). If the City Council determines that a type of military equipment identified in that annual military equipment report has not complied with the standards for approval, the City Council shall either disapprove a renewal of the authorization for that type of military equipment or require modifications to the military equipment use policy in a manner that will resolve the lack of compliance.

9.26.070 Severability

A. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Chapter, or any application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Chapter.

B. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Chapter and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any other portion of this Chapter or application thereof would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

EXHIBIT D
43 AB 481 Military Equipment
Annual Report & 2026 Equipment Request
Presented to the Marina City Council
Chief Randy Hopkins | 2026
Marina Police Department

EXHIBIT E
44 AB 481 Overview
What the Law Requires
Requirements
• Governing body approval of military equipment by
or
dinance
• Annual reporting to City Council
• Public posting of policy 30 days prior to hearing
• Annual community engagement meeting
Council Must Find
• Equipment is necessary
• No reasonable alternative exists
• Cost-effective compared to alternatives
• P
rior use complied with policy
Marina Police Department

EXHIBIT E
45 2025 Compliance Summary
0 New
Acquisitions
0 Policy
Violations
0 Complaints
Received
9 SRU Deployments
(Regional)
2 Deployments
in Marina
Community engagement meeting requirement: COMPLETED
All equipment remained in service consistent with Policy 707 Marina Police Department

EXHIBIT E
46 Current Equipment Inventory
Category Equipment Qty Status
UAS / Drones DJI Mavic (various models) 4 Active
Armored Vehicle Lenco BearCat (MPRSRU) 1 Regional / Active Patrol Rifles Various (standard issue, exempt) 23 Active 40mm Launchers Penn Arms Single / Multi Shot 7 Active
BolaWrap 150 Remote Restraint Device 1 Active / SRU
Patrol rifles are standard-issue, exempt per Gov Code §7070(c)(10), included for transparency.

Marina Police Department

EXHIBIT E
47 2025 Equipment Use Summary
Marina Deployments (2)
March 27
Attempted murder suspect search — Command Post, BearCat, Drones
Sept. 10
Arrest warrant service — Command Post, BearCat, Drones
• 7 additional regional SRU deployments across Monterey Peninsula • All deployments involved high-risk incidents: armed suspects, barricaded subjects, warrant service • All deployments complied with Policy 707
Marina Police Department

EXHIBIT E
48 2026 New Equipment Request
# Equipment Est. Cost Purpose
1 Mini UAS Drones (5) ~$10,000 Modernization / redundancy 2 Advanced Large Drone (1) TBD Thermal, extended flight, night ops 3 Multi-40mm Launcher (1) ~$2,000 Less-lethal force option 4 Rifle Suppressors (6) ~$6,000 Hearing protection (not silence) 5 Patrol Rifles – Colt M4 (4) $10,000 Replace aging 20-year inventory No expansion of authorized uses. No change to use-of-force policy. No change to training requirements.

Marina Police Department

EXHIBIT E
49 Safeguards & Oversight
Policy Protections
• Military Equipment Coordinator designated
• Annual inventory verification
• Annual Council review required
• All uses governed by Policy 707
Public Accountability
• Annual report posted on department website
• Community engagement meeting held annually
• Public complaint process: email, phone, mail, in-per son, online form
[email protected]
Marina Police Department

EXHIBIT E
50 Recommendation

1. Receive and file the 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report

2. Adopt an ordinance approving amendments to the Military Equipment Use Policy authorizing additional equipment for 2026
Marina Police Department Questions?

EXHIBIT E
51 March 12, 2026 Item No. 13a

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
Of the Marina City Council of April 7, 2026

CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2026-,

APPROVING THE REQUEST FROM IZUNOKUNI, JAPAN TO

CHANGE CITY RELATIONSHIP DESIGNATION FROM FRIENDSHIP

TO SISTER CITY IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY OF MARINA
SISTER CITIES POLICY; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE THE SISTER CITY MOU, SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-, approving the request from Izunokuni, Japan to change city relationship designation from Friendship to Sister City in accordance to the City of Marina Sister Cities Policy; and

2. Authorizing the city manager to execute the Sister City MOU, subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND:

On June 6, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution 2023-61 (EXHIBIT A), approving the Sister Cities Policy . The resolution also include d Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) for both Friendship and Sister Cities designations , and the differences between the two designations. The Friendship City MOU from Izunokuni, Japan, was entered into and signed by Izunokuni Mayor Masayuki Yamashita on June 28, 2023 (EXHIBIT B).

ANALYSIS:

In the three years since entering the Friendship City MOU, Izunokuni and Marina have maintained strong relations focused on the strength of the online student exchange program. For academic years 2023-2024, 2024-2025, and 2025-2026, six students each from Izunokuni and Marina High School have met virtually for three student exchange sessions, which have been successfully executed.

In July 2024, a delegation from Izunokuni which included Mayor Yamashita and his respective staff, traveled to Marina to meet with City Staff, the Asian Communities of Marina (ACOM) organization, and staff from Marina High School.

In March 2025, a delegation from Marina which included members of Council, City staff and ACOM members traveled to Izunokuni.

The Sister City program application from ACOM was received and approved by the Sister Cities subcommittee on March 9, 2026 (EXHIBIT C) and a Sister City MOU is being brought forth to City Council for approval (EXHIBIT D).

1 Changing the Izunokuni city designation from Friendship to Sister city would allow the virtual student exchange program to continue on an annual academic year basis, while also allowing for the implementation of the Youth Homestay Exchange Program (YHEP), with the first group of high school students from Izunokuni traveling to Marina in August 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT:

While $5000.00 is allocated from the budget for supporting the Sister City program, at this time no additional funding is being requested. Any additional financial support needed for the program will come back to City Council for approval.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and approval.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Cyrah Caburian
Executive Assistant
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

A – Resolution No. 2023-61, Sister Cities Policy and MOU B – Signed Friendship City MOU between Izunokuni, Japan and City of Marina C – March 2026 application to change Izunokuni Sister City designation D – Sister City MOU

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

APPROVING THE REQUEST FROM IZUNOKUNI, JAPAN TO CHANGE CITY

RELATIONSHIP DESIGNATION FROM FRIENDSHIP TO SISTER CITY IN

ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY OF MARINA SISTER CITIES POLICY AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SISTER CITY MOU,

SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY

WHEREAS, on June 6, 2023, the Marina City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023 -61 establishing the City of Marina Sister Cities Policy and approving Memoranda of Understanding for Friendship City and Sister City designations; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the adopted policy, the City of Marina and the City of Izunokuni, Japan entered into a Friendship City Memorandum of Understanding on June 28, 2023; and

WHEREAS, since entering into the Friendship City Memorandum of Understanding, the cities of Marina and Izunokuni have maintained strong relations through initiatives such as a virtual student exchange program between Marina High School and students in Izunokuni during the 2023-2024, 2024-2025, and 2025-2026 academic years; and

WHEREAS, delegations from Izunokuni and Marina have visited each other’s cities, including an Izunokuni delegation visit to Marina in July 2024 and a Marina delegation visit to Izunokuni in March 2025, further strengthening the relationship between the two communities; and

WHEREAS, the Asian Communities of Marina (ACOM) submitted an application requesting the relationship designation be changed from Friendship City to Sister City, which was approved by the Sister Cities Subcommittee on March 9, 2026, and would allow for the continuation of the student exchange program and the implementation of the Youth Homestay Exchange Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-, approving the request from Izunokuni, Japan to change city relationship designation from Friendship to Sister City in accordance to the City of Marina Sister Cities Policy; and

2. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Sister City MOU, subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on this 7th day of April 2026 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
3 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-61

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA APPROVING POLICY ON SISTER AND FRIENDSHIP CITIES; APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR FRIENDSHIP CITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MARINA AND IZUNOKUNI, JAPAN;

AND APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTAND ING FOR SISTER CITY AGREEMENT

BETWEEN CITY OF MARINA AND NAMWON, SOUTH KOREA
WHEREAS, at the May 16, 2023 City Council meeting, staff and Councilmember Biala presented information on Sister Cities and drafts on the policy and Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) for Council consideration and adoption for the two Cities who have reached out to the City seeking affiliations. Clarification was made on the types of City affiliations the cities of Izunokuni, Japan and Namwon, South Korea are seeking; and
WHEREAS, The Council directed staff to implement feedback received into the draft policy for final adoption; and
WHEREAS, Both the Cities of Izunokuni and Namwon would need Council approval by first adopting the City’s Sister and Friendship City policy, and then enter into an MOU with each respective city.

WHEREAS, At the City Council’s direction, the MOUs will be entered into an agreement following approval of the Sister Cities Policy with the Cities of Izunokuni and Namwon as Friendship and Sister Cities, respectively; and
WHEREAS, Staff will be proposing that $5000.00 be budgeted in the upcoming Fiscal Year 2023 -2024 and 2024-2025 Budget for support of the Sister City program. Any additional financial support needed for the program will come back to City Council for approval NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. approving the City of Marina Sister Cities Policy; and

2. Approve Memorandum of Understanding for Friendship City agreement between City of Marina and Izunokuni, Japan; and

3. Approve Memorandum of Understanding for Sister City agreement between City of Marina and Namwon, South Korea; and

4. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the MOUs subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney; and

5. Authorizing the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on this 6th day of June 2023 by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS: Visscher, McCarthy, Biala, Medina Dirksen, Delgado NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

EXHIBIT A
4 CITY OF MARINA

SISTER CITIES POLICY
DEFINITION:

The City of Marina Sister Cit ies Program encompasses two types of partnerships between two countries of either a Friendship City or a Sister City designation. A Friendship City is a less formal relationship that is focused on a three-year time-limited specific initiative without signific ant funding allocations from the City of Marina. By contrast, a Sister City relationship has an intended long-term commitment of five years and beyond by both cities that may encompass several projects over an extended period of time; such initiatives may require more planning and are associated with a need to maintain a budget for specific requests for funding from the City of Marina and other sources. Sister City applicants will identify a sponsoring 501(c)(3) organization committed to managing, coordinat ing and implementing activities related to their prospective cities under the Program.

A relationship is officially recognized after the elected bodies from both communities sign off on a MOU agreement to become a Friendship City or Sister City. The City of Marina can have any number of Friendship and Sister City relationships, with community involvement from volunteers, representatives from supportive community businesses, academic institutions, and 501(c)(3) nonprofit or civic organizations. Each Sister City organization is independent and can pursue activities and areas important to both jurisdictions, including cultural, educational and municipal leadership exchanges, business/trade networking, and other projects of interest under the Sister City Program.

PURPOSE:

To establish a policy governing the City of Marina’s (“City”) responsibilities relating to the Sister City Program (“Program”). Friendship and Sister City relationships under the Program are effective when organizations of interested residen ts in one community work with interested residents in another city to promote communication and understanding among people of different cultures.

The City will maintain a Program Subcommittee (“Subcommittee”) composed of a maximum of 10 members that will approve applications . The City Manager will appoint appropriate Subcommittee members and City staff to act as liaison to the City Council. Depending upon the specific projects being considered, guest representatives may be included for a limited time for specified purposes. Membership to the Program Subcommittee will include private citizens residing in Marina, representatives from 501(c)(3) organizations that have a commitment for active participation, and the City staff liaison. The mutually agreed upon Program exchanges will be identified in a signed MOU between the two cities and may encompass such activities as, but not limited to: visitation by delegations, remote or in-person student exchange activities, sharing of cultural and artistic performances, historical or educational awareness projects, and networking of businesses for mutual economic benefits.

EXHIBIT A
5 Sister Cities Policy

POLICY:

1. A Sister/Friendship City proposal will require recommendation by a member of the City Council.
a. Establishing a Sister City or Friendship City relationship requires approval by the City Council by a signed Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between the City and the proposed Sister/Friendship City. The term of the Sister City relationship is f ive years; the term of a Friendship City relationship is three years, and the Friendship City may apply for a Sister City status anytime during the three year term or later.

2. The Program Subcommittee will evaluate proposals for a new Sister/Friendship City affiliation and the City Council will give approval based on, but not limited to, the following guidelines:
a. A city chosen for a Sister /Friendship City affiliation should be from a country that has established diplomatic relations with the United States. There should be the potential for genuine people-to-people contact; communication and visitation should be able to occur freely in both directions.
b. The proposed Sister/Friendship City should be similar in population size, and/or role in the region, and/or have cultural, educational, socio-economic, governmental, or other tangible features in common with Marina, making it an appropriate Sister/Friendship City. c. There should exist in the City an identifiable resident group or association, which favors the proposed affiliation and intends to pursue a meaningful program after the relationship is established. The group should be in a position to be the pr imary organizer and finance its own activities.
d. A governmental entity/person should exist in the affiliate Sister City, with a clear indication of intent to carry out mutual Program projects and initiatives. e. The municipal government’s high ranking official of the affiliate Sister City (e.g., Mayor) should demonstrate support for establishing and developing a Sister /Friendship City affiliation with the City.

3. The City will support the Sister City Program activities as follows:
a. The City establishes a Program Subcommittee which will be composed of a maximum of 10 members that will include citizens, 501(c)(3) organization representatives, and the City staff liaison.
b. The City Manager shall designate a City staff member to the Subcommittee to serve as the City’s liaison regarding Sister/Friendship City activities to the City Council. c. The City staff liaison will act in a support capacity to the affiliat e City that will assume primary responsibility for the planning and execution of activities and events for visits of delegations to Marina from Sister/Friendship Cities.

EXHIBIT A
6 Sister Cities Policy

d. The City will provide set -up and complimentary access to City facilities for Sister/Friendship City events. Sister/Friendship City delegations and community sponsoring organizations must contact City staff at least sixty (60) calendar days in advance for any formal visits, events, and meetings.

e. Modest City promotional gifts may be funded by the City with the approval of the City Manager. Such minor City funds may be exempted from section 3f below, such as:

i) Light refreshments for meetings and activities when deemed appropriate.

ii) Reasonable postage, facsimile, copying and/or printing support for Sister/Friendship City events in which the City is participating.

iii) Exchange of promotional and formal gifts are typical of Sister/Friendship City visits between both delegations.

f. If funds from the City are requested, a budget request m ust be submitted to the City staff liaison detailing proposed Sister City-related expenditures. City funds may be provided to the Program Subcommittee 501(c)(3) association to support their general operating expenses as submitted in the budget request. Only incidental expenses (see section 3e) will be provided for Friendship City activities.

i) When a Councilmember or other City official initiates a request to visit a n affiliate Sister City, such a request will be made in writing to the City Council, outlining the proposed itinerary, how travel and expenses will be funded, and other assistanc e City staff will be asked to provide (e.g., gifts to be presented to officials of the affiliate Sister/Friendship City). All budget requests must be approved by the City Council for visitation to the affiliate Sister City for Councilmembers or others acting as an official City representative.

ii) Gifts and/or memorabilia presented to the City from a Sister/Friendship City delegation and intended for the City becomes the prop erty of the City and shall be displayed at a City facility or distributed at the City’s discretion. Gifts or memorabilia intended for and received by individual City Councilmembers or City employees are subject to applicable Fair Political Practices Commis sion and Government Code reporting requirements.

g. Travel accommodations and expenses for affiliate Sister/Friendship Cities visiting the City will be paid by the affiliate’s individual participant(s), or sponsoring community or governmental entities. The City will not fund travel nor reimburse travel or lodging expenses for affiliate Sister/Friendship City visitors to the U.S.

4. If a Friendship City affiliation is inactive for a period of three years or longer or if a Sister City affiliation is inactive for a period of five years or longer, or if there is a lack of community support through the community sponsoring organization for the Sister /Friendship City to continue, the City may initiate the process to place the relations hip into emeritus status (an inactive Sister/Friendship City relationship) or terminate the Sister/Friendship City affiliation with the Sister/Friendship City.

EXHIBIT A
7 Differences between Friendship City and Sister City
under the Marina Sister City Program:

Friendship City Sister City
General description
• Informal
• Short-term project focused
• Three-year commitment
• Formal
• Long-term relationship
with varied yearly
initiatives
• Five-year commitment
City Council approval to
engage? Yes Yes
Sister City Subcommittee
application approval? Yes Yes
MOU required, signed by
both Marina and affiliate
Sister City
Yes Yes
Involved citizen and/or
community association
involvement in Sister City
Program?
No Yes
Possible funding from the
City of Marina?
• Incidental expenses (gifts,
printing, refreshments, etc.)
• No funding for travel &
lodging
• Incidental expenses and
events
• Limited funding for official
travel/lodging

EXHIBIT B
8 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

AGREEMENT FOR A FRIENDSHIP CITY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY OF MARINA AND ____________________
WHEREAS, the City of Marina, California, United States of America, and _______________, established a Friendship City relationship on _______________, and; WHEREAS, both cities seek to enrich cultural understanding, create cultural, educational, leadership, business exchanges between the two cities, and broaden and encourage goodwill between the cities, and;
WHEREAS, t he City of Marina and _______________ support the promotion of mutual understanding, expansion of official and non -governmental exchanges to enhance friendship, peace, stability and prosperity in their respective region and the world at large, and; WHEREAS, in order to develop a Friendship City relationship with cooperation between the City of Marina and _______________, both cities agree to a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) to support a Friendship City relationship on the following terms:

1. To promote common prosperity and development, both cities will organize, on the basis of equality, mutual benefit and goodwill, cultural exchanges and other information sharing that may include tradition and culture, business and commerce, governmental administration, health and sports interests, history, science, technology and other information sharing.

2. Citizens, civic and business groups of each city are recognized as ambassadors of goodwill to organize cultural exchanges that may include the above topics.

3. A governmental entity/person should exist in both the City of Marina and the participating Friendship City with clear indication of intent to carry out mutual program projects and initiatives.

4. Each city shall organize cultural, business, and educational excha nges involving adults and/or students within the duration of the MOU to the extent possible (may entail overlap with a future renewal of the MOU). Each exchange or visit shall be reviewed in advance with the City of Marina’s Sister City Program Subcommittee that includes resident groups/ associations and representatives of relevant school entities for student exchange projects, and businesses for trade exchanges, as appropriate.

5. In-person exchange visit details and activities shall be cooperatively agreed upon by the sponsoring organizations. Activities shall be provided with the objective to deepen cultural awareness and friendship among citizens, business leaders, and governmental leaders.

EXHIBIT C
9 Friendship City MOU

6. Both Friendship Cities will agree that all elements of the Friend ship City relationship are to remain noncontroversial and will maintain that historically controversial political issues play no part in this Friendship City relationship.

7. The effective term for an MOU for Friendship Cities shall be three years following the date of execution with the ability to renew or apply for Sister City status.

8. Prior to expiration of the MOU of the Friendship City relationship renewal by the City Council of the City of Marina, the City Sister City Program Subcommittee will evaluate the progress of the relationship and recommend whether the relationship shall continue.

9. Termination of this MOU agreement can occur at any time by either city or the affiliate city with 60 calendar days’ notice to close any previously arranged initiatives, as necessary.

If a Friendship City affiliation is inactive for a period of three years or longer, or if there is a lack of community support through the community sponsoring organization for the Friendship City to continue, the City of Marina may initiate the process to place the relationship into emeritus status (an inactive Friendship City relationship) or terminate the Friendship City relationship.

10. This represents the entire agreement between the cities. It may not be changed or modified without a resolution signed by city officials from both participating cities.

These two cities hereby execute the MOU to expire within three years from the noted date(s).

____________________,
On its behalf
City of Marina,
On its behalf

____________________________
(City Official, Title)
Date signed:

____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
Date signed:

EXHIBIT C
10 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

AGREEMENT FOR A SISTER CITY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY OF MARINA AND ____________________
WHEREAS, the City of Marina, California, United States of America, and _______________, established a Sister City relationship on _______________, and; WHEREAS, both cities seek to enrich cultural understanding, create cultural, educational, leadership, business exchanges between the two cities, and broaden and encourage go odwill between the cities, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Marina and _______________ support the promotion of mutual understanding, expansion of official and non -governmental exchanges to enhance friendship, peace, stability and prosperity in their respective region and the world at large, and; WHEREAS, in order to develop a Sister City relationship with cooperation between the City of Marina and _______________, both cities agree to a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) to support a Sister City relationship on the following terms:

1. To promote common prosperity and development, both cities will organize, on the basis of equality, mutual benefit and goodwill, cultural exchanges and other information sharing that may include tradition and culture, business and commerce, governmental administration, health and sports interests, history, science, technology and other information sharing.

2. Citizens, civic and business groups of each city are recognized as ambassadors of goodwill to organize cultural exchanges that may include the above topics.

3. A governmental entity/person should exist in both the City of Marina and the participating Sister City with clear indication of intent to carry out mutual program projects and initiatives.

4. Each city shall organize cultural, business, and educational exchanges involving adults and/or students within the duration of the MOU to the extent possible (may entail overlap with a future renewal of the MOU). Each exchange or visit shall be reviewed in advance with the City of Marina’s Sister City Program Subcommittee that includes resident groups/associations and representatives of relevant school entities for student exchange projects, and businesses for trade exchanges, as appropriate.

5. In-person exchange visit details and activities shall be cooperatively agreed upon by the sponsoring organizations. Activities shall be provided with the objective to deepen cultural awareness and friendship among citizens, business leaders, and governmental leaders.

EXHIBIT D
11 Sister City MOU

6. Both Sister Cities will agree that all elements of the Sister City relationship are to remain noncontroversial and will maintain that historically controversial political issues play no part in this Sister City relationship.

7. The effective term for this MOU for Sister Cities shall be for five years following the date of execution with ability to renew or apply alternatively for a Friendship City status.

8. Prior to expiration of the MOU of the Sister City relationship renewal by the City Council of the City of Marina, the City Sister City Program Subcommittee will evaluate the progress of the relationship and recommend whether the relationship shall continue.

9. Termination of this MOU agreement can occur at any time by either city or the affiliate city with 60 calendar days’ notice to close any previously arranged initiatives, as necessary. If a Sister City affiliatio n is inactive for a period of five years or longer, or if there is a lack of community support through the community sp onsoring organization for the Sister City to continue, the City of Marina may initiate the process to place the relationship into emeritus status (an inactive Sister City relationship) or terminate the Sister City relationship.

10. This represents the entire agreement between the cities. It may not be changed or modified without a resolution signed by city officials from both participating cities.

These two Cities hereby execute the MOU to expire within five years from the noted date(s).

____________________,
On its behalf
City of Marina,
On its behalf

____________________________
(City Official, Title)
Date signed:

____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
Date signed:

EXHIBIT D
12 June 6, 2023 Item No. 10g(3)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
Of the Marina City Council of June 6, 2023

CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2023-, APPROVING POLICY ON SISTER AND FRIENDSHIP CITIES ;

APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR

FRIENDSHIP CITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MARINA AND
IZUNOKUNI, JAPAN; AND APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING FOR SISTER CITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF MARINA AND NAMWON, SOUTH KOREA.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-, approving the City of Marina Sister Cities Policy; and

2. Approve Memorandum of Understanding for Friendship City agreement between City of Marina and Izunokuni, Japan; and

3. Approve Memorandum of Understanding for Sister City agreement between City of Marina and Namwon, South Korea; and

4. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the MOUs subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney; and

5. Authorizing the Finance Director to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

BACKGROUND:

At the May 16, 2023, City Council meeting, staff and Councilmember Biala presented information on Sister Cities and drafts on the policy and Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) for Council consideration and adoption for the two Cities who have reached out to the City seeking affiliations.

Clarification was made on the types of City affiliations the cities of Izunokuni, Japan and Namwon, South Korea are seeking.

The Council directed staff to implement feedback received into the draft policy for final adoption.

ANALYSIS:

Both the Cities of Izunokuni and Namwon would need Council approval by first adopting the City’s Sister and Friendship City policy, and then enter into an MOU with each respective city.

Attached for Council approval are the draft Sister Cities policy (EXHIBIT A); a fact sheet listing the differences between Friendship and Sister Cities under the Marina Sister City program (EXHIBIT B); draft MOUs and agreements for both a Friendship City (EXHIBIT C) and Sister City (EXHIBIT D); and a draft Sister City Program application (EXHIBIT E).

At the City Council’s direction, the MOUs will be entered into an agreement following approval of the Sister Cities Policy with the Cities of Izunokuni and Namwon as Friendship and Sister Cities, respectively.

13 FISCAL IMPACT:

Staff will be proposing that $5000.00 be budgeted in the upcoming Fiscal Year 2023 -2024 and 2024-2025 Budget for support of the Sister City program. Any additional financial support needed for the program will come back to City Council for approval.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and approval.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Cyrah Caburian
Executive Assistant
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

A – Draft Sister Cities Policy
B – Differences between Friendship City and Sister City under the Marina Sister City Program C – Draft Memorandum of Understanding Agreement for a Friendship City D – Draft Memorandum of Understanding Agreement for a Sister City E – Draft Sister City Program Application

14 EXHIBIT B
15 EXHIBIT B
16 EXHIBIT C
17 EXHIBIT C
18 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDI NG

AGREEMENT

FOR A SISTER CITY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY

OF MARINA AND
____________________
WHEREAS, the City of Marina, California, United States of America, and , established a Sister City relationship on , and; WHEREAS, both cities
seek to enrich cultura l understanding, create cu ltural, educational, leadership, business exchanges between the tw o cities, and broaden and encourage goodwill between the cities, and;
WHEREAS, the City of
Marina and support the promo tion of mutual
understanding, expansion of official and non-governmental exchanges to enhance friendship, peace, stability and prosperity in their respec tive region and the world at large, and; WHEREAS, in order to develop a Sister City relationship with cooperation between the City of Marina
and , both cities agree to a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) to support a Sister City relationship on the following terms:

1. To promote common prosperity and development, both cities w ill organize, on the basis of equality, mutual benefit and goodw ill, cultural exchanges and ot her information sharing that may include tradition and culture, business and commerce, governmental administration, health and sports interests, history, science, technology and other information sharing.

2. Citizens, civic and business groups of each city are recognized as ambassadors of goodwill to organize cultural exchanges that may include the above topics.

3. A governmental entity/person shoul d exist in both the City of Marina and the participating Sister City with clear indication of intent to carry out mutual program projects and initiatives.

4. Each city shall organize cultural, business, and educational exchanges involving adults and/or students within the duration of the MOU to the extent possible (may entail overlap with a future renewal of the MOU). Each exchange or visit sh all be reviewed in advance with the City of Marina’s Sister City Program Subcommittee th at includes resident gr oups/associations and representatives of relevant sc hool entities for student exchange projects, and businesses for trade exchanges, as appropriate.

5. In-person exchange visit details and activities sh all be cooperatively agreed upon by the sponsoring organizations. Activities shall be pr ovided with the objective to deepen cultural awareness and friendship among citizens, business leaders, and governmental leaders.

EXHIBIT D
19 Sister City MOU

6. Both Sister Cities will agree that all elements of the Sister City relationship are to remain noncontroversial and will maintain that historically controversial political issues play no part in this Sister City relationship.

7. The effective term for this MOU for Sister Cities shall be for five years following the date of execution with ability to renew or apply alternatively for a Friendship City status.

8. Prior to expiration of the MOU of the Sister City relationship renewal by the City Council of the City of Marina, the City Sister City Progr am Subcommittee will evaluate the progress of the relationship and recommend whether the relationship shall continue.

9. Termination of this MOU agreement can occur at any time by either city or the affiliate city with 60 calendar days’ notice to close any previo usly arranged initiatives, as necessary. If a Sister City affi liation is inactive for a period of five years or longer, or if there is a lack of community support through the community sponsoring organization for the Sister City to continue, the City of Marina may initiate the process to place the relationship into emeritus status (an inactive Sister City relationship) or terminate the Sister City relationship.

10. This represents the entire agreement between th e cities. It may not be changed or modified without a resolution signed by city officials from both participating cities.

These two Cities hereby execute the MOU to expire within five years from the noted date(s). ,
On its behalf
____________________________
(City Official, Title)
Date signed:

City of Marina,
On its behalf
____________________________
Layne P. Long, City Manager
Date signed:

Approved as to form:
____________________________
City Attorney
Date signed:

EXHIBIT D
20 March 13, 2026 Item No: 13b
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the Marina City Council
City Council Meeting
of April 7, 2026

CITY COUNCIL TO RECEIVE A PRESENTATION REGARDING THE
STATUS OF THE CITY’S FORT ORD HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN

COMPLIANCE PROJECT AND CITY-WIDE INCIDENTAL TAKE

PERMIT FOR MONTEREY GILIA PROJECT FROM DENISE DUFFY
AND ASSOCIATES, INC., AND PROVIDE INPUT ON THE

CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR MONTEREY GILIA
FOR THE CITY-WIDE ITP.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving a presentation regarding the status of the City’s Fort Ord Habitat Management Plan Compliance Project and City-Wide Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for Monterey Gilia Project.

2. Providing input on the Conceptual Mitigation Strategy for Monterey Gilia for the City- Wide ITP.

BACKGROUND:

Fort Ord Habitat Management Plan Compliance
The U.S. Army’s decision to close and dispose of the Fort Ord military base was considered a major federal action that could affect listed species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). In 1993, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( “USFWS” or the “Service” ) issued a Biological Opinion (“BO”) on the disposal and reuse of former Fort Ord requiring that a Habitat Management Plan be developed and implemented to reduce the incidental take of listed species and loss of habitat that supports these species. As a result, the U.S. Army prepared the Installation-Wide Multispecies Habitat Management Plan for Former Fort Ord, California (“HMP”) in 1997. The Fort Ord Reuse Authority ( “FORA”) was in the process of preparing a Fort Ord Habitat Conservation Plan (“HCP”) to support the issuance of base-wide incidental take permits, which incorporated the habitat requirements of the HMP. However, the base -wide permitting effort was discontinued, and the Fort Ord HCP is no longer proposed. As a result, the Service requested that the local jurisdictions initiate the steps necessary to comply with the approved HMP. The City is responsible for four Habitat Management Areas ( “HMAs”), including the Salinas River, Airport, Northwest Corner, and Landfill HMAs “EXHIBIT A.” In accordance with the requirements described in the HMP and the deed restrictions for the parcels, a Resource Management Plan (“RMP”) must be prepared and implemented.

On December 15, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -157 approving an Agreement with Denise Duffy & Associates , Inc. (“DD&A”) to provide biological consulting services to develop the RMP. The RMP will bring the City into compliance with deed restrictions and federal agency requirements to manage the City’s HMAs to mitigate for development on former Fort Ord.
1 On April 6, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -26 approving Amendment No. 1 to the DD&A Agreement, which provided for focused botanical surveys within the four habitat management areas to better inform management recommendations from the initial scope of work.

At the City Council meeting on December 17, 2024, DD&A presented an update on the status of this project, including an updated timeline for completion.

At the City Council meeting on May 20, 2025, DD&A presented an update on the status of this project, including an updated timeline for completion.

At the City Council meeting on June 3, 2025, the Council approved a new contract with DD&A to continue providing biological consulting services to the City for this project.

At the City Council meeting on November 18, 2025, the Council received an update on the status of this project, including an updated timeline and the coordination efforts with the 2045 General Plan Update. The City Council requested that the Salinas River HMA be evaluated for public access.

City-Wide Incidental Take Permit for Monterey Gilia
The City currently owns a number of parcels in the former Fort Ord that were deeded to the City by the U.S. Army as economic conveyances following the closure of the former base that allow for development for commercial/residential purposes, which are known or have the potential to support occurrences of Monterey gilia ( Gilia tenuiflora spp. arenaria). Monterey gilia is a threatened species listed under the California Endangered Species Act ( “CESA”) and an endangered species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act ( “ESA”). Impacts to this plant species from potential future development activities on these parcels would require an Incidental Take Permit (“ITP”) in accordance with Section 2081(b) of the CESA.

Therefore, on December 15, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020 -157 approving an agreement with DD&A to provide biological consulting services to assist the City in acquiring a City-Wide ITP from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) to authorize the incidental take of Monterey gilia that may result from the implementation of future planned development on City lands in the former Fort Ord.

On April 6, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -26 approving Amendment No. 1 to the DD&A Agreement, which provided for additional surveys for this species.

On December 7, 2021, the City Council held an informational and public input session regarding the prioritization of conservation and development areas to inform the mitigation strategy for the City-Wide ITP for Monterey gilia. The City Council requested that options be prepared and brought back to the council and public for discussion. In response to that request, City staff and DD&A held an in -person community workshop presenting the data and various options to the public and held a study session at a special City Council meeting on December 11 and 13, 2022, respectively. The public and City Council supported focusing development opportunities within the Airport Business Park Area , Future Cypress Knolls Development Area, and Marina Northwest Corner HMA for the Del Monte Boulevard Extension , and focusing conservation within the remaining study areas, as shown in “EXHIBIT B.” At the City Council meeting on December 17, 2024, DD&A presented an update on the status of this project, including recent input from the resource agencies and an updated timeline for completion.
2 At the City Council meeting on May 20, 2025, DD&A presented an update on the status of this project, and received input on a conceptual realignment of the proposed Del Monte Boulevard/2nd Avenue Extension.

At the City Council meeting on June 3, 2025, the Council approved a new contract with DD&A to continue providing biological consulting services to the City for this project.

At the City Council meeting on November 18, 2025, the Council received an update on the status of this project and staff requested input on the Conceptual Mitigation Strategy for Monterey gilia (“Conceptual Mitigation Strategy”), which is conceptually depicted in “EXHIBIT C.” Specifically, staff solicited Council input on “joining mitigation strategies” with the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (“TAMC”) to mit igate for their impacts to Monterey gilia that would occur as a result of the construction of the proposed California Avenue Segment of the Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway (“FORTAG”) project (“proposed FORTAG project”), which is located on City land . The “joining mitigation strategies” approach involves aligning the mitigation measures, timelines, and conservation objectives of these three permitting efforts.

Under the “joining mitigation strategies” approach with TAMC, a portion of the 8 th Street Area would be set aside to mitigate for the proposed FORTAG project, which is conceptually depicted in “ EXHIBIT D.” The balance of the 8 th Street Area would contribute to the proposed conceptual mitigation strategy for Monterey gilia under the City -Wide ITP. At the request of the City, CDFW would be willing to provide written assurance that the City would be able to incorporate the remaining balance of the parcel for the City -Wide ITP. The City would provide for the permanent protection and management of the 8 th Street Area under a conservation easement and long -term management plan, combining or coordinating the respective mitigation measures so that habitat preservation, enhancement, and monitoring requirements function cohesively.

The City recognizes the significance and community benefits of the proposed FORTAG project and greatly values its longstanding partnerships and agreements with TAMC , specifically the FORTAG Master Agreement. As a result, the City Council supported the “joining mitigation strategies” approach with TAMC as part of the City -Wide ITP mitigation strategy. As a result, City staff is coordinating with TAMC on the specific terms of this approach and complet ing certain permit lands package requirements . City staff will return to City Council to request approval of the agreement, record the conservation easement, and other related items in the coming months.

On March 27, 2025, CDFW issued a Notice of Violation ( “NOV”) to the Dadwal Management Group (“Dadwal”) for the unauthorized take of Monterey gilia associated with the construction of the Home2Suites project in the City of Marina. The NOV requires that Dadwal submit an ITP application for the impacted Monterey gilia. To fully mitigate for the take of Monterey gilia, CDFW may require compensatory mitigation in the form of acquisition and perpetual management of habitat management lands; a 3:1 mitigation ratio has been required for similar projects in previous ITPs issued by CDFW. Because the City was currently undergoing the City - Wide ITP process, CDFW recommended that Dadwal coordinate with the City to determine the feasibility of including mitigation for the unauthorized take as part of the City -Wide ITP. As a result, City staff also solicited input from Council on incorporating the mitigation required to mitigate for the unauthorized take of Monterey gilia associated with the construction of the Home2Suites project in the City.
3 However, the City Council ha d questions about incorporating the Home2Suites mitigation into the City -Wide ITP , specifically requesting a better understanding of the City’s role as a fiduciary, and requested additional information on several other items, as identified below. The Council requested this information be presented before providing any additional input and City staff agreed to return to Council with the requested information.

ANALYSIS:

Fort Ord Habitat Management Plan Compliance
As described above, the City is required to develop a RMP to identify the habitat management activities required in the four HMAs with in the City’s jurisdiction. The City continues to coordinate with DD&A and the resource agencies to complete the administrative draft. The City and DD&A are collaborating closely to ensure that the City -Wide ITP and 2045 General Plan Update projects both inform and complement the RMP . An updated project timeline is included in the presentation.

At the November 18, 2025, City Council meeting, the public and City Council acknowledged that the Salinas River HMA is a unique area that warrants evaluation for potential public use.

Under the HMP, this area is designated as a “Habitat Reserve,” a land use category intended to protect biologically important habitat for HMP target species. Lands designated as Habitat Reserves are set aside from development, and the primary management objective for this category is the conservation and enhancement of threatened and endangered species. With the exception of the Oak Oval HMA owned by the County of Monterey, new development is not allowed within designated Habitat Reserves, including the construction of new roads or trails.

However, public access may be permitted within the Salinas River HMA provided that the goals and objectives of the HMP, and the RMP currently under development, continue to be met. Any such access would be required on existing roads and trails unless an amendment to the HMP is approved by the USFWS.

The Draft RMP will describe the existing and potential future uses within the Salina River HMA and i dentify habitat management and monitoring measures , and associated costs, to ensure activities within the HMA remain consistent with the goals and objectives of the HMP and RMP.

The public and Council will have the opportunity to review and provide comments on the proposed uses and management measures, and associated costs, during the public review period for the Draft RMP, anticipated in fall 2026.

City-Wide Incidental Take Permit for Monterey Gilia
As summarized above, the Council raised questions and requested additional information regarding the City -Wide ITP Conceptual Mitigation Strategy, including clarification on incorporating the Dadwal NOV into the City -Wide ITP and a better understanding of the City’s role as a fiduciary. The Council also requested additional information on several other items related to the Conceptual Mitigation Strategy as follows:
• The potential implications for the City -Wide ITP associated with retaining or closing the existing equestrian trails through the 8th Street Area; • Changing the land use designation of the southwestern portion of the Northwest Corner HMA to Conservation instead of existing designation of Habitat Preserve & Other Open Space and proposed designation under the 2045 General Plan as Regional Retail; • Detailed traffic study for the conceptual Del Monte Extension that also allows the FORTAG connection and Evaluate the placement of a trail similar to the FORTAG concept from 2 nd Avenue to Del Monte Boulevard within the Northwest Corner HMA; and
4 • Explore the possibility of mitigation sites outside of the City limits and/or not owned by the City that would provide sufficient lands to mitigate impacts to the southern polygon in Cypress Knolls.

The City is requesting Council input on the following discussion items to finalize the Conceptual Mitigation Strategy for Monterey gilia for inclusion in the ITP application.

Dadwal NOV and City-Wide ITP
As stated above, t he NOV requires that Dadwal submit an ITP application for the impact s to Monterey gilia that resulted from the construction of the Home2Suites hotel in the University Villages Specific Plan area. To fully mitigate for the take of Monterey gilia, CDFW may require compensatory mitigation in the form of acquisition and perpetual management of habitat management lands; a 3:1 mitigation ratio has been required for similar projects in previous ITPs issued by CDFW but mitigation ratios are determined on a project-by-project basis.

The NOV did not specify the amount of take that occurred during construction of the Home2Suites project. The University Villages Specific Plan EIR estimated that there were approximately 0.2 acres of occupied Monterey gilia habitat containing approximately 789 individuals within the entire 420-acre University Villages Specific P lan area. Based on the data collected for the University Villages Specific Plan EIR and GIS analysis, it is estimated that approximately 0.02 acre s (871.2 square feet [ sf]) of occupied Monterey gilia habitat containing approximately 59 individuals were impacted during construction of the Home2Suites. Assuming a 3:1 mitigation ratio , Dadwal may be required to acquire , restore, manage, and preserve 0.06 acres (2,613.6 sf) of compensatory mitigation lands. Given the limited availability of mitigation lands for Monterey gilia , scale of the impact, and the City is undergoing the City -Wide ITP process, CDFW recommended that Dadwal coordinate with the City to determine the feasibility of including mitigation for the unauthorized take as part of the City-Wide ITP.

Because the City is already proposing conservation of the 8 th Street Area as part of the City - Wide ITP Conceptual Mitigation Strategy , City staff identified a 0. 36-acre area within that conservation area where mitigation for the impacts from the Home2Suites project could occur, as shown in “EXHIBIT D.” This 0.36-acre area was identified due to the presence of suitable soils and open, sandy areas that could provide opportunities for planting of Monterey gilia. The ITP requirements to remedy the unauthorized take of Monterey gilia by Dadwal are not known at this time. However, based on DD&A’s experience, restoration of Monterey gilia habitat at a 3:1 ratio for the area impacted (i.e., 0.06 acres) may be considered an appropriate remedy by CDFW.

Identifying a larger restoration allows restoration activities to occur at densities and distributions appropriate for Monterey gilia.

As the City is already proposing to conserve the 8 th Street Area as part of the City -Wide ITP, incorporating mitigation for the Dadwal NOV into this conservation area can be accomplished without significant additional effort or resource commitment by the City. In addition, incorporating mitigation for the Dadwal NOV into the City -Wide ITP would not necessitate an increase in the amount of mitigation land included in the overall Conceptual Mitigation Strategy or reduce the area proposed for future development. Under the City -Wide ITP, the City will be required to manage and preserve the 8th Street Area in perpetuity. Once the ITP is issued this will include, among other requirements, the preparation and implementation of a Long -Term Management Plan (LTMP) and the establishment of an endowment to fund the management in perpetuity.
5 If mitigation for the Dadwal NOV is incorporated into the City-Wide ITP, the specific mitigation requirements would be identified in the LTMP, and the endowment would identify the associated costs to implement these requirements over the long term. The City could request reimbursement from Dadwal for these costs, in addition to costs incurred for processing the ITP and completing the lands package. The City could enter into an agreement with Dadwal to define the respective roles and responsibilities, including funding obligations for the mitigation, once ITP requirements are finalized. Such an agreement would ensure that Dadwal is responsible for his share of the costs associated with mitigation for incidental take related to the NOV.

If the City chooses not to incorporate the mitigation required by the Dadwal NOV, Dadwal will be required to obtain a project-specific ITP independently.

It would likely be necessary to engage a qualified consultant to assist in obtaining and implementing the ITP. Given the limited availability of mitigation land, the size of a suitable parcel for managing and preserving the required Montere y gilia habitat is uncertain. Assuming a minimum 3:1 ratio, Dadwal would need at least 0.06 acres of mitigation land in the project vicinity. Given that it may be likely that the 0.06 acres needs to be rounded up to 0.5 acre due to the practical difficulty of locating mitigation land that exactly matches the minimum required acreage, total costs to obtain and implement the ITP independently for 0.5 acres of mitigation land, including the consultant services, could range from $500,000 to $850,000.

Potential implications for the City -Wide ITP associated with retaining or closing the existing equestrian trails through the 8th Street Area
The City is proposing a City -Wide, or regional, approach to mitigat e for impacts to Monterey gilia populations from future development. This approach results in a holistic , landscape-scale strategy rather than a project-by-project, piecemeal approach to mitigation. As a result, CDFW is evaluating the Conceptual Mitigation Strategy at a regional scale, considering overall habitat quality, rather than prescribing a specific mitigation ratio as is typically required at a project level.

Therefore, retaining the 1.1 acres equestrian trails and allowing access through the 8 th Street Area would not necessitate an increase in the amount of mitigation land included in the overall Conceptual Mitigation Strategy. Potential implications for retaining these trails may include trail maintenance, installation and maintenance of fencing and signage along the trails, and monitoring to ensure that fence conditions are maintained and that trail use does not adversely affect adjacent habitat areas. These requirements would be identified in the LTMP, and costs would be included in the endowment.

Potential implications of closing the equestrian trails may include installing and maintenance of access control features and signage to deter trespassing, monitoring for unauthorized use, restoration, and inspections to ensure that new informal trails do not develop. These requirements would be identified in the LTMP, and costs would be included in the endowment.

Based on these assumptions, it is anticipated that the costs associated with retaining and closing the trails would be similar in magnitude under the City-Wide ITP.

Changing the land use designation in the southwestern portion of the Northwest Corner HMA to Conservation instead of existing designation of Habitat Preserve & Other Open Space and the proposed designation under the 2045 General Plan as Regional Retail 6 This request from City Council would involve changing the land use designation for the southwestern portion of the Northwest Corner HMA to a Conservation designation, rather than retaining the existing designation of Habitat Preserve & Other Open Space or the proposed Regional Retail designation identified in the Draft Land Use Plan prepared for the City’s 2045 General Plan Update.

The City is currently preparing the 2045 General Plan Update. On January 9, 2025, the City Council identified its preferred land use alternative for the General Plan. The alternative is currently being analyzed in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) , which is anticipated to be released in Summer 2026. Modifying this designation at this stage would represent a significant and costly change and would delay the release of the Draft EIR. As such, modifying the land use designation represents a planning and policy decision that should be considered through the established planning and environmental review process associated with the 2045 General Plan Update.

Detailed traffic study for the conceptual Del Monte Extension that also allows the FORTAG connection; Evaluate the placement of a trail similar to the FORTAG concept from 2 nd Avenue to Del Monte Boulevard within the Northwest Corner HMA

The City Council requested the City staff come back with a detailed traffic study for the conceptual Del Monte Extension that also allows for the FORTAG connection. In addition, Council requested that staff evaluate the placement of a trail similar to the FORTAG concept (e.g., Class 1 Trail) that would extend from 2 nd Avenue to Del Monte Boulevard within the Northwest Corner HMA.

CDFW advised the City that it may be difficult to identify sufficient conservation land within the City to mitigate for the impacts to Monterey gilia that would result from constructing the 2 nd Avenue/Del Monte Extension project. The USFWS had similar concerns regarding impacts to Smith’s blue butterfly. The resource agencies strongly encouraged that the City evaluate alternative alignments for the proposed roadway that would not bi -sect populations of these species. As discussed above, at the May 20, 2025, City Council meeting, City Council supported a conceptual realignment of the proposed Del Monte Boulevard/2 nd Avenue Extension to avoid impacts to potential federally Endangered Smith’s blue butterfly habitat and reduce impacts to Monterey gilia within the Northwest Corner HMA, per the recommendations of the USFWS and CDFW.

The conceptual realignment would be located east of the originally proposed alignment, and while the 2 nd Avenue Extension would not connect directly to Del Monte Boulevard, it would connect to Patton Parkway and extend west to connect directly to Del Monte Boulevard (“EXHIBIT E”). Thus, the realignment would meet the safety and connective goals of the project.

City staff requested that Kimley -Horn evaluate the placement of a Class 1 trail within the Northwest Corner HMA; two potential alignments were evaluated: Alignment-A and Alignment- B (“EXHIBIT F”). As shown as in “EXHIBIT F,” the trail would either need to be located on the far western or eastern boundary of the parcel in order to avoid and/or reduce impacts to Monterey gilia and Smith’s blue butterfly.

As shown as in “EXHIBIT G,” the existing grades along Alignment -A would exceed accessibility design standards and the creation of cut and fill sections to flatten grades would impact the existing Caltrans right -of-way and Monterey gilia and Smith’s blue butterfly populations. In addition, this alignment may encroach into the coastal zone. Construction of this 7 alignment would likely require an encroachment permit from Caltrans, a Coastal Development Permit, and additional conservation land or a reduction in areas proposed for future development to mitigate impacts to Monterey gilia and Smith’s blue butterfly under the City -Wide ITP. As a result, Kimley-Horn determined Alignment-A would be infeasible.

As shown as in “EXHIBIT H,” there is the potential that the existing grades along Alignment -B would be within accessibility design standards and the cut and fill sections may potentially avoid the Monterey gilia and Smith’s blue butterfly populations. However, this alignment would encroach into property owned by the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District ( “MPUSD”) in order to avoid the large population of Monterey gilia, which would require an easement from the MPUSD. The City contacted MPUSD to inquire about the potential for an easement, but MPUSD indicated it could conflict with planned field improvements. Those improvements have since been constructed, leaving insufficient space to accommodate Alignment -B without encroaching on the large population of Monterey gilia. Therefore, this alignment is not feasible without providing additional conservation land or reducing areas proposed for future development to offset impacts to Monterey gilia and Smith’s blue butterfly under the City -Wide ITP.

Therefore, there is no feasible alignment for a Class 1 Trail along the eastern or western boundaries of the Northwest Corner HMA that would avoid significant impacts to Monterey gilia or Smith’s blue butterfly. Construction of either alignment would require the addition of conservation land or a reduction in areas proposed for future development to offset impacts to these species under the City -Wide ITP. As noted above, identifying additional conservation land within the City, and potentially outside the City, may not be feasible.

A detailed traffic study will be completed for the proposed 2 nd Avenue/Del Monte Boulevard Extension project as part of the project’s planning and environmental review process ; the requested study is not required for the City-Wide ITP process.

For the purposes of the City -Wide ITP process, City staff recommend including the conceptual realignment shown in “EXHIBIT E ” as a future development project in the City -Wide ITP Conceptual Mitigation Strategy.

Explore the possibility of mitigation sites outside of the City limits and/or not owned by the City that would provide sufficient lands to mitigate impacts to the southern polygon in Cypress Knolls

City Council requested that City staff explore potential mitigation land opportunities outside of City limits and /or not owned by the City. As discussed above, CDFW is evaluating the Conceptual Mitigation Strategy at a regional scale, considering overall habitat quality, rather than prescribing a specific mitigation ratio as is typically required at a project level. Therefore, at this early stage in the permitting process, it is not yet known whether impact s to the southern polygon in Cypress Knolls would require additional mitigation land. Dr. Fred Watson of CSUMB has expressed that the two large polygons containing populations of Monterey gilia within the Cypress Knolls area represent historically important populations. In response, City staff have proposed protecting these areas as part of the planning process for the Cypress Knolls Specific Plan area. Future development proposals in this area will require focused botanical surveys as part of the biological resources analysis, which will further inform the conservation strategy.

Based on these consideration s, City staff recommends continuing to propose protection of the two polygons as shown in “EXHIBIT H.” If additional mitigation land is ultimately required as a result, City staff will return to Council for further direction. 8 FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impacts of the discussion items above are identified by subject below:
• Allowing public access within the Salinas River HMA
o The Draft RMP will describe the existing and potential future uses within the Salina River HMA and identify habitat management and monitoring measures, and associated costs, to ensure activities within the HMA remain consistent with the goals and objectives of the HMP and RMP. The public and Council will have the opportunity to review and provide comments on the proposed uses and management measures, and associated costs, during the public review period for the Draft RMP, anticipated in fall 2026.
• Dadwal NOV and City-Wide ITP
o If incorporated into the City -Wide ITP, t he City could enter into an agreement with Dadwal to define the respective roles and responsibilities, including funding obligations for the mitigation, once ITP requirements are finalized. Such an agreement would ensure that Dadwal is responsible for his share of the costs associated with mitigation for incidental take related to the NOV. • The potential implications for the City -Wide ITP associated with retaining or closing the existing equestrian trails through the 8th Street Area
o Based on the assumptions provided, it is anticipated that the costs associated with retaining and closing the trails would be similar in magnitude. • Changing the land use designation of the southwestern portion of the Northwest Corner HMA to Conservation instead of existing designation of Habitat Preserve & Other Open Space and proposed designation under the 2045 General Plan as Regional Retail o Modifying the land use designation for this portion of the Northwest Corner HMA would represent a significant and costly change and would delay the release of the Draft EIR. This change is best evaluated through the broader policy framework of the General Plan and its accompanying environmental review. • Detailed traffic study for the conceptual Del Monte Extension that also allows the FORTAG connection and Evaluate the placement of a trail similar to the FORTAG concept from 2nd Avenue to Del Monte Boulevard within the Northwest Corner HMA o A detailed traffic study will be completed for the proposed 2 nd Avenue/Del Monte Boulevard Extension project as part of the project’s planning and environmental review process with the cost to be determined at a future date; the requested study is not needed for the City -Wide ITP process . For the purposes of the City -Wide ITP process, City staff recommend including the conceptual realignment shown in “EXHIBIT E” as a future development project in the City-Wide ITP Conceptual Mitigation Strategy with no additional cost anticipated at this time. • Explore the possibility of mitigation sites outside of the City limits and/or not owned by the City that would provide sufficient lands to mitigate impacts to the southern polygon in Cypress Knolls.
o No additional cost anticipated at this time as this exploration would occur if needed as part of the existing budget.
9 CONCLUSION:

City staff have provided responses to City Council information requests and are requesting input on the proposed Conceptual Mitigation Strategy for the City-Wide ITP to support the preparation of the application.

Respectfully submitted,
_____________________________
Guido Persicone, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Marina
REVIEWED/CONCUR:
___________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina
2037445.1
10 C it y o f M a r ina C it y- Wid e M o nt e r e y G il ia I T P H a b it a t M a na g e m e nt A r e a s 1 in = 3 , 0 0 0 f t
X
1 1 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 5
¯
P a t h : C : \ G I S \ G I S _ P r o je c t s \ 2 0 2 1 - 0 3 C it y o f M a r ina I T P \ M a p P r o d u c t s \ 2 0 2 5 m a ps \ F ig X - H a b it a t M a na g e m e nt A r e a s . m x d S c a l e
D a t e F ig u r e
0 0 . 2 50 . 5m i
Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.
P l a nning a nd E nv ir o nm e nt a l C o ns u l t ing F o r m e r F o r t O r d B o u nd a r y C it y o f M a r ina L im it s
C it y o f S e a s id e L im it s H a b it a t M a na g e m e nt A r e a ( H M A ) Marina
Northwest
Corner
HMA
Marina
Airport
HMA
Salinas River
HMA
Landfill HMA
ReservationRd
Inter-GarrisonRd
|ÿ1 BlancoRd
!‘
C I T Y O F M A R I N A
C O U N T Y O F M O N T E R E Y
!“
!‘
C I T Y O F M A R I N A
C I T Y O F S E A S I D E
!“
ImjinPkwy

EXHIBIT A
·|}þ1
I m j i n P kw y
I nte r - G a r r i son R d
R e se r v a ti on R d
B l a nc o R d
A b r a m s D r
C oope r R d
D e l M onte B l v d
B e a c h R d
C a l i for ni a A v e
C a r m e l A v e
D e F or e st R d
M onte r e y G i l i a O c c u r r e nc e s w i th i n P ote nti a l F u tu r e D e v e l opm e nt A r e a s  A i r por t a nd D e l M onte B ou l e v a r d E x te nsi on D e v e l opm e nt S c e na r i o 1 i n = 2 , 0 0 0 ft 2 c
8 / 1 8 / 2 0 2 2
¯
P ath : D : \ GI S \ G I S _ P r oj e c ts\ 2 0 2 1 - 0 3 C i ty of Mari na I T P \ Map P r od u c ts\ F i g 2 c - Monte re y Gi l i a A i rport D MB D e v e l opm e nt S c e nari o 8 - 1 8 - 2 2 . m x d S c al e
D ate
Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.
P l a nni ng a nd E nv i r onm e nta l C onsu l ti ng F i g u r e
0 0 . 5 10 . 2 5 M i l eF or m e r F or t O r d B ou nd a r y C i ty of M a r i na L i m i ts
H a b i ta t M a na g e m e nt A r e a ( H M A ) A r m y P a r c e l s
Monterey Gilia Occurrences in HMAs and
Potential Future Development Areas
2006-2021 DD&A Survey Results
!( Monte re y Gi l i a I nd i v i d u al s Monte re y Gi l i a P opu l ati ons 2017-2021 F. Watson Lab Survey Results
!( Monte re y Gi l i a I nd i v i d u al s 5 0 ft B u ffe r of Monte re y Gi l i a Oc c u rre nc e s P ote nti al D e v e l opm e nt E nv e l ope s ( 3 4 6 . 5 a c ) Potential Future Development Areas
8 th S tr e e t N or th A r e a
8 th S tr e e t S ou th A r e a
A i r por t B u si ne ss P a r k A r e a F u tu r e C y pr e ss K nol l s D e v e l opm e nt A r e a P r e ston P a r k A r e a
S a l i na s/ R e se r v a ti on R oa d A r e a A i r por t M a ste r P l a n A r e a L a nd fi l l H M AL a nd fi l l H M A S a l i na s R i v e rS a l i na s R i v e r H M AH M A
M a r i na A i r por tM a r i na A i r por t H M AH M A
M a r i naM a r i na
N or th w e stN or th w e st
C or ne r H M AC or ne r H M A
1 6 2 . 8 a c
3 0 9 pl a nts
1 1 . 2 a c
0 pl a nts 9 . 1 a c
4 1 pl a nts
9 . 4 a c
2 pl a nts
1 1 . 6 a c
0 pl a nts
9 9 . 3 a c
2 8 2 4 pl a nts
1 0 . 7 a c
5 1 pl a nts
7 . 0 a c
2 1 pl a nts
2 5 . 5 a c
1 2 0 0 pl a nts

EXHIBIT B
City of Marina City-Wide Monterey Gilia ITP
Conceptual Mitigation Strategy w/ Proposed FORTAG Alignment 1 in = 2,000 ft
2 11/6/2025
¯
Path: C:\GIS\GIS_Projects\2021-03 City of Marina ITP\Map Products\2025 maps\Fig 2 - Conceptual Mitigation Strategy w FORTAG.mxd Scale
Date Figure
0 1,000 2,000 Feet
Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.

Planning and Environmental Consulting
Former Fort Ord Boundary
City of Marina Limits
Landfill Cap
Existing/Potential Development Areas
Potential Development Envelopes
Potential Preservation Envelopes
Yadon's Piperia (50 ft Buffer)
Proposed FORTAG Alignment
Monterey Gilia (56.2 ac)
Proposed Impact (19.6 ac)
Proposed Preservation (33.8 ac)
Proposed Preserved by FORTAG (1.2 ac)
Retained by the Army (1.6 ac)
Marina Northwest
Corner HMA
Home2Suites
8th St
Reservation Rd
Airport
Business Park
Conceptual
Del Monte Extension
Alternative Alignment
Preston Park
Landfill HMA
8th St
Reservation Rd
Imjin Pkwy
Inter-Garrison Rd
|ÿ1
Cypress Knolls
Abrams Dr

EXHIBIT C
8th Street
Conceptual Mitigation Strategy 1 in = 300 ft
6 3/13/2026
¯
Path: C:\GIS\GIS_Projects\2021-03 City of Marina ITP\Map Products\2026 maps\Fig 6 - 8th Street 1-5-26.mxd Scale
Date Figure
0 150 300 Feet
Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.

Planning and Environmental Consulting
8th Street Area (47.5 ac)
Assessor's Parcel 031101055000 (28.5 ac)
Potential Development Envelopes (13.5 ac)
Potential Preservation Envelopes (34.0 ac)
Proposed FORTAG Preservation Area (4.8 ac)
Proposed Home2Suites Preservation Area (0.36 ac)
Potential Restoration Area (City) (1.3 ac)
Potential Restoration Area (Home2Suites) (0.36 ac)
Proposed Equestrian Allowable Use (1.1 ac)
Existing Equestrian Trails
Proposed FORTAG Alignment
Monterey Gilia (3.6 ac)
Proposed Impact (0.2 ac)
Proposed Preservation (2.2 ac)
Proposed Preserved by FORTAG (1.2 ac)
ImjinPkwy
Imjin Rd
8th St
9th St
California
Dr

EXHIBIT D
B5-B8 Fields
LEGEND

CYPRESS KNOLLS SP AREA

DUNES SP AREA

SENSITIVE HABITAT AREAS

COUNTY GIS PARCELS

POTENTIAL ROUNDABOUT
CITY OF MARINA - 2ND & 3RD AVENUE ALIGNMENT STUDY

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
ROADWAY ALIGNMENTS - ALTERNATIVE 1B
STATE ROUTE 1 INTERCHANGE CONCEPT
JUNE 2025 097789139

EXHIBIT E
LEGEND

CYPRESS KNOLLS SP AREA

SENSITIVE HABITAT AREAS

COUNTY GIS PARCELS
CITY OF MARINA - 2ND & 3RD AVENUE ALIGNMENT STUDY

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH

CLASS I TRAIL FEASBILITY
POTENTIAL ALIGNMENTS - ALTERNATIVE 1B
JUNE 2025 097789139

EXHIBIT F
CITY OF MARINA - 2ND & 3RD AVENUE ALIGNMENT STUDY

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORT+

CLASS I TRAIL FEASIBILITY

ALIGNMENT-A
JUNE 2025 097789139
STATE ROUTE 1

OFF-RAMP TO DEL MONTE BLVD

PATTON PKWY

EXHIBIT G
CITY OF MARINA - 2ND & 3RD AVENUE ALIGNMENT STUDY

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR
PLANNING PURPOSES.

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORT+

CLASS I TRAIL FEASIBILITY

ALIGNMENT-B
JUNE 2025 097789139
2ND AVE

PATTON PKWY

EXHIBIT H