Cities Index.
Agenda

Marina City Council
June 2, 2026

Document
Agenda
Meeting
June 2, 2026
Body
Marina City Council
Pages
12
Original file
176.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.cityofmarina.org. That file is the official record.

AGENDA
Tuesday, June 2, 2026 5:00 P.M. Closed Session
6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR

AGENCY OF THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).

Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
AND
Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556

PARTICIPATION
You may participate in the City Council meeting in person or in real-time by calling Zoom Meeting via the weblink and phone number provided at the top of this agenda. Instructions on how to access, view and participate in remote meetings are provided by visiting the City’s home page at https://cityofmarina.org/. Attendees can make oral comments during the meeting by using the “Raise Your Hand” feature in the webinar or by pressing *9 on your telephone keypad if joining by phone only.

The most effective method of communication with the City Council is by sending an email to [email protected] Comments will be reviewed and distributed before the meeting if received by 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. All comments received will become part of the record.

Council will have the option to modify their action on items based on comments received.

AGENDA MATERIALS
Agenda materials, staff reports and background information related to regular agenda items are available on the City of Marina’s website www.cityofmarina.org. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available on the City of Marina website www.cityofmarina.org subject to City staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.

VISION STATEMENT
Marina will grow and mature from a small town bedroom community to a small city which is diversified, vibrant and through positive relationships with regional agencies, self -sufficient. The City will develop in a way that insulates it from the negative impacts of urban sprawl to become a desirable residential and business community in a natural setting. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

AMENDED AGENDA PACKET
Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 2

MISSION STATEMENT
The City Council will provide the leadership in protecting Marina’s natural setting while developing the City in a way that provides a balance of housing, jobs and business opportunities that will result in a community characterized by a desirable quality of life, including recreation and cultural opportunities, a safe environment and an economic viability that supports a high level of municipal services and infrastructure. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The City recognizes that it was founded and is built upon the traditional homelands and villages first inhabited by the Indigenous Peoples of this region - the Esselen and their ancestors and allies - and honors these members of the community, both past and present.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM: (City Council, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonprofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Members and Marina Groundwater Sustainability Agency)

Jenny McAdams, Brian McCarthy, Kathy Biala, Mayor Pro-Tem/Vice Chair Liesbeth Visscher, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None

4. CLOSED SESSION:
a. Conference with Legal Counsel, Anticipated Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)(4)), 1 potential case. City Council to consider initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(4). b. Conference with Legal Counsel: Existing Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)(1)), 2 cases
i. Lazy Wheel MHP 101 LLC, et al. v. City of Marina, et al., 26CV002531, Monterey County Superior Court
ii. CEMEX - Consent Settlement Agreement and Cease and Desist Order, CCC- 17-CD-02, California Coastal Commission
c. Public Employment Appointment (Govt. Code §54957(b)) Position: City Manager
d. Real Property Negotiation (Govt. Code Section 54956.8) i. Property: Portion of APN No. 031-101-034
Negotiating Party: Board of Trustees of The California State University Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
6:30 PM - RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN

CLOSED SESSION

5. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. LGBTQ+ Pride Month Proclamation
b. CSUMB SHTM Program Presentation on Gateway Hub Project.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 3

7. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS:

8. PUBLIC COMMENT: Any member of the public may comment on any matter within the City Council’s jurisdiction that is not on the agenda. This is the appropriate place to comment on items on the Consent Agenda. Action will not be taken on items not on the agenda. Comments are limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. General public comment may be limited to thirty (30) minutes and/or continued to the end of the agenda. Any member of the public may comment on any matter listed on this agenda at the time the matter is being considered by the City Council. Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.

9. CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Background information has been provided to the Successor Agency of the former Redevelopment Agency on all matters listed under the Consent Agenda, and these items are considered to be routine and non -controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda are normally approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of the public or City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, the Council may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. If an item is pulled for discussion, it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency.

10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and non-controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda may be approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, Council may remove the item from the Consent Agenda and it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items.
a. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Accounts Payable Check Numbers 109313-109381, totaling $1,585,429.60 b. MINUTES: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) May 5, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting
c. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: None
d. AWARD OF BID: None
e. CALL FOR BIDS:
(1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, approving advertising and call for bids for the Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road Intersection Improvements Project.
(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2026, approving advertising and a call for bids for the construction of the Windy Hill Park Restroom Improvements Project.
f. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 202 6-, approving a request by Marina Station Phases 1 and 2, LLC., to release a portion of the performance security for public improvements in the Marina Station Phases 1 and 2 area in the amount of $ 11,349,900; and accepting a substitute performance bond security of $1,261,100 for the remaining punch list items.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 4

(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2026, denying the request submitted by Kris Cameron on behalf of the Fogtown Family Car Club to use the City of Marina logo.
(3) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, a ccepting the rehabilitation of the Marina Arts Village and the completion of the Arts District Stabilization Project; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion with the Monterey County Recorder’s Office.
g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, approving the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants between the City of Marina and Interim, Inc. for the Marina Kai development.
(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2026, approving FY 2026 -2027 amendments to Exhibits A and B of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between ReGen Monterey and its member agencies regarding compliance with SB 1383.
h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS:
(1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a deed for the conveyance of the extension of 2 nd Avenue; and described therein, from Shea Homes Limited Partnership to the City of Marina and to take all other actions necessary to accept and record said deed on behalf of the City of Marina.
i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE): None
k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS: None
l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING): None
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS: None

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS: In the Council’s discretion, the applicant/proponent of an item may be given up to ten (10) minutes to speak. All other persons may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak on the matter.
a. Open a Public Hearing and consider adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, approving a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of 44 trees and approval of a Design Review Permit in support of a new car dealership on the property located at 2101 First Avenue (Opportunity Area 3.2 of the Dunes Development); and find that any environmental impacts from the recommended action have been previously reviewed in the environmental impact report for the University Village Specific Plan EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167).
b. Open a public hearing and adopt City Council Resolution 2026 -, approving the appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit CUP26-000002 to establish a drive -thru lane at the previously approved gas station, convenience store, and car wash located at the northwest corner of Del Monte Blvd/2nd Avenue and Imjin Parkway; and find that the project will not result in new significant environmental impacts or effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the University Village Specific Plan EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167).

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 5

12. OTHER ACTIONS ITEMS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY : Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The Successor Agency may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

13. OTHER ACTION ITEMS: Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The City Council may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

Note: No additional major projects or programs should be undertaken without review of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006). a. Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, approving the recommendation from ReGen Monterey’s Technical Advisory Committee Subgroup to initiate a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process for future solid waste, recycling, and organics collection services; and approving the Process Integrity Policy governing the procurement process.
b. Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, amending the rate adjustment calculation of the franchise agreement with GreenWaste Recovery utilizing a sector specific uniform percentage adjustment and approving maximum rates to be charged by GreenWaste Recovery effective July 1, 2026, for collection of franchised solid waste, recycling, and organics.
c. Receive a presentation on past amendments to the Council Rules, (2) further amendments and refinements to such Rules; and (3) providing direction to City Attorney and Staff on other refinements or amendments to such Rules .

Continued from May 5 and 19, 2026

14. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council reports on meetings and conferences attended ( Gov’t Code Section 53232).

15. ADJOURNMENT:

CERTIFICATION

I, Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Marina, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall and Council Chambers Bulletin Board at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Monterey County Library Marina Branch at 190 Seaside Circle, City Bulletin Board at the corner of Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard on or before 6:30 p.m., Friday, May 29, 2026.

___________________________________

ANITA SHARP, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
City Council, Airport Commission and Redevelopment Agency meetings are recorded on tape and available for public review and listening at the Office of the City Clerk and kept for a period of 90 days after the formal approval of MINUTES.

City Council meetings may be viewed live on the meeting night and at 12:30 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. on Cable Channel 25 on the Sunday following the Regular City Council meeting date. In addition, Council meetings can be viewed at 6:30 p.m. every Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. For more information Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 6

about viewing the Council Meetings on Channel 25, you may contact Access Monterey Peninsula directly at 831-333-1267.

Agenda items and staff reports are public record and are available for public review on the City's website (www.ciytofmarina.org), at the Monterey County Marina Library Branch at 190 Seaside Circle and at the Office of the City Clerk at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina between the hours of 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m., on the Monday preceding the meeting.

Supplemental materials received after the close of the final agenda and through noon on the day of the scheduled meeting will be available for public review at the City Clerk’s Office during regular office hours and in a ‘Supplemental Binder’ at the meeting.

ALL MEETINGS ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. THE CITY OF MARINA DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible. Meetings are broadcast on cable channel 25 and recordings of meetings can be provided upon request. To request assistive listening devices, sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please call (831) 884 -1278 or e -mail:
[email protected]. Requests must be made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.

U p c o m i n g 2026 M e e t i n g s o f t h e C i t y C o u n c i l , A i r p o r t C o m m i s s i o n , M a r i n a A b r a m s B N o n - P r o f i t C o r p o r a t i o n , P r e s t o n P a r k S u s t a i n a b l e C o m m u n i t y N o n p r o f i t C o r p o r a t i o n , S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y o f t h e F o r m e r R e d e v e l o p m e n t A g e n c y a n d M a r i n a G r o u n d w a t e r S u s t a i n a b i l i t y A g e n c y R e g u l a r M e e t i n g s : 5 : 0 0 p . m . C l o s e d S e s s i o n ; 6 : 3 0 p . m . R e g u l a r O p e n S e s s i o n s

Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Tuesday, September 1, 2026
Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Tuesday, July 7, 2026
Tuesday, July 21, 2026 (Cancelled)

Tuesday, October 6, 2026
Tuesday, October 20, 2026

**Wednesday, August 5, 2026
Tuesday, August 18, 2026 (Cancelled)

***Wednesday, November 4, 2026
Tuesday, November 17, 2026

Tuesday, December 1, 2026
Tuesday, December 15, 2026

** Regular Meeting rescheduled due to National Night Out *** Regular Meeting rescheduled due to City Election Day

C I T Y H A L L 202 6 H O L I D A Y S
(City Hall Closed)

Juneteenth Day--------------------------------------------------------------- Friday, June 19, 2026 Independence Day (City Offices Closed) ---------------------------------- Friday, July 3, 2026 Labor Day ------------------------------------------------------------ Monday, September 7, 2026 Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 7

Veterans Day (City Offices Closed) ------------------------- Wednesday, November 11, 2026 Thanksgiving Day ------------------------------------------------- Thursday, November 26, 2026 Thanksgiving Break -------------------------------------------------- Friday, November 27, 2026 Winter Break ----------------- Thursday, December 24, 2026- Thursday, December 31, 2026

2026 COMMISSION DATES

U p c o m i n g 2026 M e e t i n g s o f P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n 2nd and 4th Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

June 10, 2026 September 9, 2026 November 11, 2026
June 24, 2026 September 26, 2026 November 25, 2026 (Cancelled) July 8, 2026 October 14, 2026 December 9, 2026
July 22, 2026 October 23, 2026 December 23, 2026
August 12, 2026 November 11, 2026
August 26, 2026

U p c o m i n g 2026 M e e t i n g s o f P u b l i c W o r k s C o m m i s s i o n 1st Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

June 4, 2026 August 6, 2026 October 1, 2026
July 2, 2026 September 3, 2026 November 5, 2026
December 3, 2026

U p c o m i n g 2 0 2 6 M e e t i n g s o f R e c r e a t i o n & C u l t u r a l S e r v i c e s C o m m i s s i o n
4th Wednesday of every second month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

July 22, 2026 September 23, 2026 December 2, 2026

U p c o m i n g 2 0 2 6 M e e t i n g s o f M a r i n a T r e e C o m m i t t e e 2nd Wednesday of every quarter month as needed. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

July 8, 2026 October 14, 2026

Agenda Item: 6a
Repositioning and
Rebranding
Marina as a
Gateway Hub and
Regenration
Destination

A CSUMB SHTM

PROGRAM STUDY
- MAY 15, 2026
Agenda Item 6b
Agenda
The Marina Asset Promise
Market & Revenue Potential
Repositioning Marina
Rebranding Marina
The Pathway Forward
The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Hub

Study
Objectives
6/2/2026 The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Hub Study 3 • Overall Objective: Formulate an overall
economic development strategy, centered
on eco-tourism, edu-tourism, blue economy
and eco-recreation assets to create “One
More Night” visitors to ignite the growth of
sustainable, attractive and well-paying
employment opportunities in the City of
Marina as well as drive TOT revenue.
○ Sub-objective 1: Identify the local eco-tourism,
edu-tourism, blue economy and eco-recreation
assets and interconnected complementary assets
of the City of Marina and the Monterey Bay Region.
○ Sub-objective 2: Identify the market potential
(TAM, SAM and SOM), Unique Selling Proposition
(USP) and the market segments that the City of
Marina should target.
○ Sub-objective 3: Identify the key competitors, and
the key partners with whom the City of Marina
should collaborate to realize its USP.
○ Sub-objective 4: Develop strategic
recommendations linking the identified assets and
target market with an action plan to make the City
of Marina the regional eco-tourism and eco-
recreation economic growth-engine.

Topic one

THE ASSET PROMISE OF THE CITY OF MARINA

The Marina Asset Promise – Key Conclusions
• The City of Marina has key ecotourism, eco-recreation, edu-tourism, agritourism and Blue Economy assets ranging from the Fort Ord National Monument to the Marine Sanctuary to pristine beaches and parks to hiking and biking trails to CSUMB and access to 18 marine labs to the adjacent fields of the “salad and berry bowl of the world” to marine programs and marine assets that are the best in the world.
• The City of Marina is the Gateway City to world-class experiences in the Monterey Bay Region by providing “packaged tour” access to:
• Impactful eco-recreation experiences like biking, hiking, and wildlife viewing (Big Sur, Salinas River Wildlife Refuge, Marina Dunes hang-gliding, MBR equestrian ranches and rides, Fort Ord Cycling Events, CCCX etc.) • Immersive eco-tourism experiences like 17 Mile Drive, Pinnacles National Park, MB Aquarium, whale-watching, surfing, diving, sailing, kayaking, BMX racing and motor sports etc. • Iconic events and cultural experiences like Car Week/Concours, AT&T ProAM, Steinbeck Center, ethnic festivals etc. • Unique agri-tourism opportunities like wine tours, berry and vegetable picking, farm and processing plant tours etc. • One-of-a-kind Blue Economy tourism to 18 MBR Marine Labs, Elkhorn Slough, Monterey Bay Marine Sancturary tours etc. 6/2/2026 The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Tourism Hub Study 5 Source: CSUMB/MIIS (2018). Broad-based Asset Inventory of Monterey County for the City of Monterey.

These “Gateway” and “Regeneration” assets create a sustainable opportunity for regeneration, eco -conscious and wellness focused visitors all year round to keep them for “One More Night”, if properly linked, packaged and marketed.

Topic two

MARKET AND REVENUE POTENTIAL FOR THE CITY OF MARINA

City of Marina Market Potential and
TOT Revenues
6/2/2026 7
Based on the Serviceable Available Market Potential (SAM), if the City of Marina were to capture just 25% of the potential, the TOT tax revenues to the City would realistically lie between $6.2 to $9.9 million. However, it would be as high as $12.2 million to $19.9 million if the Strategic Recommendations of this report were implemented.

Source: Dean Runyan 2023 Monterey County Report: https://issuu.com/visitmontereycounty/docs/monterey_report_2023p Updated with AI projections for 2025.

The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Tourism Hub Study Conclusions Regarding Market
Potential for the City of Marina
6/2/2026 8
• Unique “Gateway” positioning in the Monterey Bay Region and California Central Coast to tap into a $3.1 billion plus tourism addressable market
• 60 to 70% of the addressable market originates in the SF Bay Area with Santa Clara, Alameda, Contra Costa and San Francisco County accounting for 65% of SF Bay Area visitors (7% is international with 2X to 3X spending)
• The operational market for the City of Marina is between $82 million to $143 million if it captures just 50% of the potential serviceable market • The TOT potential if the recommendations of this report are implemented is between $12.2 million to $19.9 million on a very conservative basis (50% of market potential)
The large market potential for the City of Marina with conservative rate of capture indicates that there is a large annual TOT potential of between $12 and $20 million that can be captured if the City becames a “Gateway Hub” and “Regeneration” Destination for ecotourism, eco-recrecreation, cultural and edu-tourism, agritourism and Blue Economy tourism.

The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Tourism Hub Study Source: Dean Runyan 2023 Monterey County Report: https://issuu.com/visitmontereycounty/docs/monterey_report_2023p Updated with AI projections for 2025.

Topic three

REPOSITIONING MARINA

MBR Visitors: Top Reasons for Visiting
● Natural Beauty & Scenery (72%): This is the leading motivator for visitors, centered on iconic locations such as Big Sur, 17-Mile Drive, and the Monterey Bay Sanctuary.
● Wildlife & Marine Life (58%): A major draw featuring the Monterey Bay Aquarium, whale watching, and Elkhorn Slough.
● Culinary & Wine Experiences (45%): Visitors are increasingly attracted to MICHELIN-star dining, Carmel Valley wineries, and local seafood. ● Outdoor Recreation (38%): Popular activities include hiking in Pinnacles or Big Sur, golfing at Pebble Beach, biking, and kayaking. ● Events & Festivals (22%): Key cultural and sporting events include the AT&T Pro-Am, Monterey Jazz Festival, Cali Roots, and Car Week. ● History & Culture (19%): Visitors explore the Monterey State Historic Park, California Missions, and the Steinbeck Center.
6/2/2026 10
The “Regenerative Traveler”: The data confirms that visitors come for natural beauty, wildlife immersive experiences, events, high-end gastronomic experiences, and history and culture.

The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Tourism Hub Study Source: See Monterey. (2025, September 2). See Monterey Unveils FY2025–26 Business Plan to Drive Tourism Through Storytelling, Events and Cultural Partnerships [Press release].

See Monterey. (2024). Monterey County Tourism 2030 Roadmap (MCT 2030).

MBR Visitors: Top Emerging Interests
● Regenerative Travel: 100% of marketing now targets visitors seeking eco- sustainability and respectful immersion through "The Right Path" initiatives. ● Professional travelers extending stays for leisure now spend 158% more than standard visitors.
● Destination Dining: Culinary interest is the fastest-growing category (+7.4%), driven by Michelin recognition and local wine culture.
● Wellness Immersion: Surging demand for "full-spectrum" wellness, combining luxury spa treatments with nature-based "forest bathing." ● Authentic Connectivity: A strategic shift from passive sightseeing to seeking deep emotional and personal connections with the destination. ● Heritage Tourism: Cultural motivation is led by the Steinbeck legacy and the "Monterey County 1000" historical programs.
6/2/2026 11
The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Tourism Hub Study Visitors don’t just want to see the Monterey Bay Region, They want to feel, experience, and connect with it through wellness, leisure experiences, sustainable and respectful immersion and authenticity.

Source: See Monterey. (2025, September 2). See Monterey Unveils FY2025–26 Business Plan to Drive Tourism Through Storytelling, Events and Cultural Partnerships [Press release].

See Monterey. (2024). Monterey County Tourism 2030 Roadmap (MCT 2030).

MBR Visitor Preferences: Inferences for Marina
● Nature based tourism with outstanding natural experiences will attract visitors and make them stay longer e.g. Fort Ord National Monument, MB Marine Sanctuary, Pinnacles etc. ● A mix of historical, gastronomic, and event experiences will attract a lot of visitors. ● Visitors far from the area will stay longer and spend more. ● Recreational activities like hiking, biking and connecting with nature have vastly increased in popularity e.g. Fort Ord trails, Marina Beaches, Highway 1 Bike Trail, Elkhorn Slough kayaking, Marina Dunes hang-gliding, BMX/mountain biking in Marina, Point Lobos etc. ● The potential for ecotourism, eco-recreation, cultural and edutourism, agri-tourism and Blue Economy tourism is strong for the City of Marina, due to its location and endowments as a Gateway location to outstanding MBR natural assets; abundance of eco-recreation activities and events; iconic cultural assets and close proximity to CSUMB, MBARI and other world-class educational and research institutions and the Salinas Valley and Wine Country. ● Natural, sanctuary/resort and eco-recreation assets provide potential to develop Marina as a “Regeneration” Destination.
623/2026 12
Visitor preferences and emerging needs create a huge opportunity for Marina to reposition itself as the “Gateway to the Monterey Bay” destination and a “Regeneration” destination with a distinctive competence and USP.

Source: SRI and Monterey County ED Economic and tourism reports, various years The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Tourism Hub Study Elements of Repositioning Marina as a “Gateway”
and “Regeneration” Destination
○ City of Marina’s natural attractions
■ Scenic shoreline, Monterey Bay Marine Sanctuary, Fort Ord National Monument, wilderness trails, equestrian park, beaches, Elkhorn Slough. Salinas River Refuge ■ Access to MBR natural attractions (e.g. Pinnacles National Park. Big Sur, 17 Mile) ○ City of Marina eco-recreation assets
■ Hiking Haven(86 miles of trails) & Mountain Biking haven(11 biking events) ■ Marine recreation (e.g. hang-gliding, Marina State Beach recreation activities) ○ City of Marina proximity to edu-tourism, agritourism, Blue Economy, and cultural tourism assets and events
■ CSUMB and marine research institution (e.g. MBARI, MLML) tours ■ Salinas valley agri-tourism opportunities (farm tours, veggie & berry picking) ■ Monterey Jazz Festival, Car Week, AT&T ProAm and new Marina Arts District ○ New developments in hospitality and eco-industry
■ Sanctuary Beach Resort and planned five-star resort
■ Cluster of old and new Marina Dunes restaurants
■ Joby Aviation tours at Marina Airport
6/2/2026 13The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Tourism Hub Study Marina’s natural, eco-recreation, edu-tourism, agritourism, Blue Economy and cultural/historical assets and events create an opportunity to reposition itself as the “Gateway to the Monterey Bay” destination and a “Regeneration” destination with a distinctive competence and Unique Selling Proposition (USP).

Unique Elements of City of Marina USP: Cultural, Historical, Agricultural Asset and Event Proximity and Access
• Access to Significant Cultural and Historical Assets: Monterey’s historical sites central to CA history, Monterey Symphony, 6-7 Ethnic festivals (e.g. Italian, Greek, Asian etc.), Steinbeck Center, Salinas Rodeo, Salinas Cinco De Mayo celebrations • Access to International and National Events: Car Week and Concours D’Elegance; AT&T Pro-AM Golf Tournament; Monterey Jazz Festival; Bach Festival, California International Air Show; California Roots Music & Arts Festival; Big Sur International Marathon; Monterey County Fair; Monterey Wine Festival, Kuumbwa Jazz in Santa Cruz • Proximity to Prime Wine Growing Area and Vintners/Wineries: River Road, Santa Lucia Wineries, Carmel Valley Wineries, Paso Roble Wineries (1.25 hours away) with storied wineries like Scheid, Bernardus, Folktale, Joyce, Pessagno, Hahn, Wrath and innumerable others in addition to easy access to Paso Robles Wine Region • Proximity to Agricultural Assets: Positioning of the City of Monterey adjacent to the historic and world-renowned Salinas Valley that is the Vegetable and Berry Basket of the US and the world with stunning vistas, opportunities for vegetable and berry picking, agritourism to iconic growing areas (Castroville, Watsonville, Pajaro, Salinas, Chular, King City etc.) and companies (Taylor, T&A, Driscolls, Oceanmist, Foxy, Pezzini etc.)
6/2/2026 14
Gateway access to significant cultural, historical, agricultural and educational assets and events creates a unique positioning not easily available to other MBR cities creating a unique “Gateway” brand.

The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Tourism Hub Study Topic four

REBRANDING MARINA

Rebranding Marina: The USP“Supernatural Marina – Gateway to Monterey Bay” Key USP Elements:
• Natural, eco-recreation and wellness assets provide for a “Regeneration” destination based on a “relaxation vibe” • Quieter, more spacious alternatives to Monterey and other MBR cities
• Eco-recreation paradise: Preserved open space and MBMS provides opportunities for hiking, cycling, kayaking and more • Modern amenities contrasted against idyllic dunes and Fort Ord Forest Preserve backdrop and the Monterey Bay Marine Sanctuary
• Gateway to the Monterey Bay Region’s and Central Coast’s natural, historical, cultural, educational & other assets. 6/2/2026 The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Tourism Hub Study Marina’s unique location in the MBR, its variegated ecotourism and ecorecreation assets, and proximity to some of the world’s leading natural and event assets creates a unique opportunity to become the Costa Rica of the USA – a leading “supernatural” ecological destination in the Northern Hemisphere at very little incremental cost.

Topic five

THE PATHWAY FORWARD

“Supernatural Marina – Gateway to Monterey Bay”
City of
Marina
Vision
Phases
Strategic Initiatives
II. Invest in
Sustainability
Expansion
Launch &
Stabilize
•Learn from successful
DMO models
•Create strong
partnerships and alliances
•Initiate and support
coordinated tourism
efforts in launch market
•Develop coordinated tour
packages
•Use partnerships to grow
asset and event-driven
tourism
•Build brand identity as
Gateway Hub
Grow
• Invest in building walkable
downtown and eco assets
• Penetrate launch market, build
strong program & destination
identity
• Expand visitor relationships and
base to new segments
• New product-markets leveraged
from initial mkt.
• Online and Mobile marketing
• Market integrated tour itineraries
• Market gastronomic, culture,
adventure, agritourism & event
experiences
• Drive and extend Gateway
Brand + “Regeneration”
Sustain
• Invest in asset
enhancement
• Build and capture
premium/specialty
market segments
• Blend and leverage
existing Gateway assets
to drive unique
experiences
• Fulfill promise of
technology in DM
• Capitalize on clear
brand identity as
Gateway &
“Regeneration” Eco
Destination
I. Build Strong
Partnerships,
Demand & Brand as
Gateway
IV. Deepen Marina
Brand and Mystique
III. Create Strong
Marketing to Drive
Brand
The Pathway Forward:

Strategic Recommendations
Focus on demand
• Learn from successful DMO
models
• Develop coordinated tour
packages
• Build brand identity as
Gateway Hub (e.g. signage)
• Build strong partnerships and
Cost Control
• Initiate and support
coordinated tourism efforts in
launch market
• Use partnerships to grow asset
& event-driven tourism
Demand
Cost Control – Expand and
Strengthen Partnerships and
Alliances
• Online & mobile/virtual marketing
• Market integrated tour itineraries
• Market gastronomic, culture,
adventure, agritourism & event
experiences
• Drive Gateway Brand
and
• Invest in building walkable downtown and
eco assets
• Penetrate launch market, build strong
program & destination identity
• Expand visitor relationships and base to
new segments
• New product-markets leveraged from initial
target market
Fulfill promise of technology
incorporation in DM
Blend and leverage existing
Gateway assets to drive
unique experiences
Invest in asset enhancement
Supply
Supply
• Build and capture
premium/specialty market
segments
• Capitalize on clear identity as
Gateway and “Regeneration” Eco
Destination
Development of Strong Brand Identity as
Gateway & “Regenration” Eco Destination
Sustain
Yea
rs 5-7
Grow
Years 3-4
Launch/Stabilize
Years 1-2
Phased Business
Plan

SHORT TERM IMPLEMENTATION
• Build strong partnerships and Cost Control
• Initiate and support coordinated tourism efforts
in launch market
• Use partnerships to grow asset & event-driven
tourism
• Learn from successful DMO models
• Develop coordinated tour packages
• Build brand identity as Gateway Hub (e.g.
signage)
Short Term
Strategies
(1 – 2 Years)
Focus on Partnerships:
• Marina/Monterey Chambers of Commerce
• Hotel companies (Sanctuary Beach Resort, MPHG – Marriott/Home2 Suites, Monterey Beach Resort, IHG/Hilton properties)
• Restaurant and food companies (Folktale, Bernardus Lodge, NRA Chapter, Salt Wood, Cannery Row Company)
• DMOs and Tourism/ Event companies (PBC, Cannery Row Co., Adventures By The Sea, Monterey Bay Kayaks, See Monterey, See Santa Cruz, MCHA, Monterey Bay Aquarium, Monterey Classic Car Rental)
• CSUMB/Marina Research Orgs./NPS/DLI
Develop Coordinated Tour Packages with Partners:
• Focus on SF Bay Area and Northern California market segments • Develop and market 1-Day, 2-Day and 3-Day Marina Gateway Hub Eco-Tour packages
• Develop and market 1-Day and 2-Day Gastronomic Tour packages • Develop and market 1-Day, 2-Day & 3-Day Event and Gastronomic Combined Tour packages
• Develop and market 1-Day and 2-Day Edu-tourism Tour packages Build Brand Identity as Gateway Hub:
• Advertise and promote Gateway tagline in multi-media campaigns • Implement signboards on Highway 1, Imjin Parkway re: Marina as Gateway Hub for the Monterey Bay Region
Launch & Stabilization
• Enter Into and Strengthen Partnerships and Alliances
• Develop Coordinated Tour Packages and Brand
Identity as Gateway Hub

MID TERM IMPLEMENTATION
Growth
• Invest in building walkable downtown
and eco assets
• Penetrate launch market, build strong
program & destination identity
• Expand visitor relationships and base to
new segments
• New product-markets leveraged from
initial target market
• Online and Mobile marketing
• Market integrated tour itineraries
• Market gastronomic, culture,
adventure, agritourism & event
experiences
• Drive & extend Gateway Brand
Mid - Term
Strategies
(3– 4 Years)
Build Walkable Downtown and Invest in Eco-assets:
• Create safer pathways, improve signage and store-front facades, walking corridors and maps, create buffer zones, traffic calming, shade and shelter, public seating, human-scale lighting, wayfinding and public art, pocket parks and plazas, and more gathering spaces that connect downtown with beaches and local attractions
• Communicate investment in new parks and greenways; advertise FORTAG Trail and Fort Ord events; ; invest in Equestrian Center, Fort Ord and Beach trails; transform Fort Ord Dunes Park through City ownership; invest in/acquire Marina Beach eco-recreation assets, activities and improvements Penetrate Launch Market & Diversify into New-Product Segments • Build strong destination & program identity in launch market through social media, virtual online tours, coordinated “experience” packages, USP mktg. • Diversify to Southern California, West Coast & International market segments • Use online, mobile and virtual “experience” marketing strategies • Market integrated 1-Day, 2-Day & 3-Day gastronomic, culture, history, adventure, agritourism and event “experience” itineraries with area partners Expand and Strengthen Partnerships and Alliances
• Expand partners: agricultural orgs/cos, arts/culture orgs, sustainability orgs, national/state orgs(NOAA, National Park Service) & strengthen existing ones Develop Strong Brand Identity as Gateway/Regenerative
Destination
• Make sustainability and “regeneration” part of Marina’s tourism brand • Develop and emphasize eco-assets & eco-recreation and Gateway Hub • Expand and Strengthen Partnerships and
Alliances
• Development of Strong Brand Identity as
Regenerative & Gateway Destination

LONG TERM IMPLEMENTATION
Sustenance
• Invest in asset enhancement
• Build and capture
premium/specialty market
segments
• Blend and leverage existing
Gateway assets to drive unique
experiences
• Fulfill promise of technology
incorporation in DM
• Capitalize on clear brand identity as
Gateway and “Regeneration” Eco
Destination
Long - Term
Strategies
(5– 7 Years)
Invest in Asset Enhancement and Eco-Recreation Improvement to Drive “Experiences”:
• Transition from "hidden gem" to premier eco-destination by investing in a multi-modal transit hub, including expanded parking, bike-share stations, and clear wayfinding from the downtown core to the trailheads. • Use the proposed $3 million Coastal Access & Amenities Plan (from the "For Marina, By Marina" initiative) to restore coastal dunes and improve public access points while converting and upgrading Fort Ord Dunes State as Marina Dunes Park under City ownership and explore water sports facilities in Marina for Monterey Bay. • Invest in Hang Gliding & Paragliding Hub: Formalize Marina State Beach as a world-class destination for non- motorized flight by improving takeoff infrastructure and hosting regional competitions. • Regional Trail Linkage: Upgrade the Monterey Bay Coastline Bike Trail segments through Marina to ensure seamless, eco-friendly travel for tourists coming from Monterey or Santa Cruz. • Cultural Districts: Support "Main Street" revitalization through the Marina General Plan (Marina 2045) by incentivizing businesses that reflect the city’s diverse demographic— particularly its culinary heritage— as a post- hike destination for eco-tourists. Create and invest in Marina “Arts District” and “Murals” City. • Blend and leverage existing Gateway assets to drive unique experiences in MBR through coordinated “tour” packages, events packages, gastronomic packages, culture/history packages, agritourism, edu-tourism etc. • Educational Ag-Tours: Position Marina as the lodging base for "Ag-Tours" that take visitors from the city into the surrounding strawberry and artichoke fields, bridging the gap between coastal leisure and inland industry.

Build and Capture Premium/Specialty Market Segments
• Marina positions itself as the "Adventure & Eco-Gateway" of the Monterey Bay, specifically targeting high- value "Seekers" and "Doers" who prioritize unique, active experiences over traditional passive luxury. • Incentivize “nature-integrated" lodging, such as the Sanctuary Beach Resort and the planned MPHG Luminaire Resort, which offer high-end bungalows and a "private retreat" feel to capture the luxury segment that wants to be on the ocean without the urban density of Cannery Row or Monterey and Carmel resorts. • Attract high-end restaurants, wineries and bars including Michelin starred properties for premium gastronomy.

Capitalize on Clear Brand Identity as Gateway and “Regeneration” Eco Destination Thru Tech • From the “Supernatural Marina – Gateway to Monterey Bay” USP make the connection narrative: "Marina:

Where the Land Meets the Sea and the Future Meets Restoration.“ with AI technology. • The "Regeneration" USP: Unlike Monterey (preservation) or Salinas (production), Marina’s story is about regeneration. Highlight the regeneration from a military base (Fort Ord) and industrial sand mines to a thriving National Monument and Marine Sanctuary creates a unique brand of "Regeneration Destination." • Invest in asset enhancement and leverage
assets to drive visitor experiences
• Build & capture premium/specialty
segments through technology and clear
brand identity
The way to get started
is to quit talking and
begin doing.

Walt Disney
236/2/2026 The City of Marina Gateway & Regeneration Tourism Hub Study Thank you
SHTM Program, California State University,
Monterey Bay
Contact: Dr. Shyam Kamath,
[email protected]

Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.465 - Prof Svc Legal - Special Counsel
12204 - State Water Resources Control
Board
05-13-26 AHO Expenses-
MPWSP/Admin Record
WC 2040
Paid by Check
# 109345
05/13/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 160,381.50
Account 6300.465 - Prof Svc Legal - Special Counsel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $160,381.50 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $160,381.50 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $160,381.50 Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $160,381.50 Department 125 - I. T.

Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.332 - Prof Svc IT - GIS Support
10515 - Rincon Consultants, Inc. 74365 Marina On-Call GIS Support - 4/1/26 -
4/30/26
Paid by EFT #
7712
05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 7,283.75
Account 6300.332 - Prof Svc IT - GIS Support Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $7,283.75 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $7,283.75 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $7,283.75 Department 125 - I. T. Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $7,283.75 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 562-0 PG&E - 4758891562-0 Paid by Check # 109340
05/11/2026 05/15/2026 05/15/2026 05/22/2026 1,629.88
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,629.88 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
12248 - Blue Triton Brands Inc 06E8720339783 Water Cooler Rentals and Replacement
Water
Paid by Check
# 109316
05/13/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/22/2026 178.95
10732 - Office Depot-General Account 467985116001 Office Supplies Paid by Check # 109338
05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/22/2026 15.19
10732 - Office Depot-General Account 467985115001 Office Supplies for BMR Paid by Check # 109338
05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/22/2026 226.09
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $420.23 Account 6600.010 - Other Charges Alarm
10981 - Sentry Alarm Systems of America,
Inc.
2315837 Alarm Monitoring -
Sports Center June-Aug
2026
Paid by Check
# 109343
05/15/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/22/2026 285.00
Account 6600.010 - Other Charges Alarm Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $285.00 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/21/2026 03:37:49 PM Page 1 of 10 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/22/26 - 05/22/26
Agenda Item: 10a
1 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6600.452 - Other Charges Leased Copier
10592 - U.S. Bank Equipment Finance-
USbancorp
581869008 City Hall Copier Lease
Payment - June 2026
Paid by Check
# 109346
05/09/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/22/2026 860.72
Account 6600.452 - Other Charges Leased Copier Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $860.72 Account 6600.460 - Other Charges Legal Notices & Pub
10270 - Monterey County Herald 0006960342 Master Fee Schedule Public Hearing Notice -
April 10th and 16th
Paid by Check
# 109337
04/30/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/22/2026 749.24
Account 6600.460 - Other Charges Legal Notices & Pub Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $749.24 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $3,945.07 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $3,945.07 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $3,945.07 Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10037 - El Rancho Wash & Dry / Andon
Laundrymat Service
8822 WASH & DRY ANIMAL

TOWELS AND

BEDDING
Paid by Check
# 109325
04/01/2026 04/22/2026 04/22/2026 05/22/2026 20.50
10326 - Language Line Services,
Inc/LanguageLine Solutions
11852925 TRANSLATION
SERVICES ACCT #
9020101064
Paid by Check
# 109332
02/28/2026 03/28/2026 04/22/2026 05/22/2026 78.02
11899 - Robert Half International, Inc 66153374 Admin Temp - JoAnn Wilson
Paid by Check
# 109342
04/27/2026 04/29/2026 04/29/2026 05/22/2026 2,070.88
11899 - Robert Half International, Inc 65984879 Temp Position Admin Asst. - JoAnn Wilson
Paid by Check
# 109342
03/09/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 1,980.58
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $4,149.98 Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint 11131 - Online Solutions LLC - Citizenserve 6598 ANNUAL BILLING FOR 7 USERS 8/1/26 -
7/31/27
Paid by Check
# 109339
05/01/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/22/2026 10,500.00
Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $10,500.00 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10053 - AT & T APR 2026 0676 ACCT # 325820676 Paid by Check # 109314
04/13/2026 05/05/2026 04/22/2026 05/22/2026 236.72
10057 - Avaya, Inc. 2222082181 MONTHLY HARDWARE
SVCS ACCT #
100828859
Paid by EFT #
7707
04/03/2026 04/22/2026 04/22/2026 05/22/2026 2.19
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/21/2026 03:37:49 PM Page 2 of 10 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/22/26 - 05/22/26
2 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10057 - Avaya, Inc. 2222085284 MONTHLY HARDWARE
SVC ACCT #
100828859
Paid by EFT #
7707
04/28/2026 04/28/2026 04/22/2026 05/22/2026 10.30
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $249.21 Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping
10235 - FedEx 9-717-63384 ACCT # 3995-9218-6 Paid by Check # 109327
04/17/2026 04/22/2026 04/22/2026 05/22/2026 11.93
Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $11.93 Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip
10330 - LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY

LTD/LC ACTION POLICE SUPPL
487363 G6 GLOCK SUPPLIES Paid by Check
# 109333
04/23/2026 05/23/2026 04/22/2026 05/22/2026 611.72
Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $611.72 Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
11824 - Gabriel Rose - Employee 05-11-26 Public Safety Career Fair - Per diem
Paid by Check
# 109348
05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/05/2026 05/22/2026 18.00
11840 - Nicholas Beavers - Employee 05-11-26 Public Safety Career Fair - Per diem
Paid by Check
# 109349
05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/05/2026 05/22/2026 18.00
Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $36.00 Account 6600.465 - Other Charges Live Scan
10193 - California Department of Justice 035227 LIVE SCANS Paid by Check # 109318
04/08/2026 04/22/2026 04/22/2026 05/22/2026 258.00
Account 6600.465 - Other Charges Live Scan Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $258.00 Account 6600.850 - Other Charges K9 / Animal Supplies & Vet Svc 10899 - Monterey County Animal Services MAR 2026 5750 3rd Qt FY 2025-26 Paid by Check # 109336
03/31/2026 04/22/2026 04/22/2026 05/22/2026 6,513.00
Account 6600.850 - Other Charges K9 / Animal Supplies & Vet Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $6,513.00 Account 6700.110 - Capital Outlay Equipment
12427 - CAMRISE LLC 8303033 DJI AVATA 2 FLY

MORE COMBO DRONE
BATTERIES 1 YR CARE
PLAN
Paid by Check
# 109319
03/30/2026 04/22/2026 04/22/2026 05/22/2026 5,995.00
Account 6700.110 - Capital Outlay Equipment Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $5,995.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $28,324.84 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $28,324.84 Department 210 - Police Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $28,324.84 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/21/2026 03:37:49 PM Page 3 of 10 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/22/26 - 05/22/26
3 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10623 - Xerox Financial Services 42035303 FD Monthly Copier Charges 05/03/26-
06/02/26
Paid by Check
# 109347
05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 257.13
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $257.13 Account 6400.739 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Exp-Fire Prevent 12130 - The Beistle Company/FIRE SMART

PROMOTIONS
120552 Kids Fire Hats Paid by Check
# 109350
01/13/2026 03/17/2026 03/17/2026 05/22/2026 268.76
Account 6400.739 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Exp-Fire Prevent Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $268.76 Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
11393 - Carmel Roasters, Inc./Carmel
Valley Coffee Roastin
75067 Coffee Filters Paid by Check
# 109320
05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/22/2026 30.59
11976 - Kaye F Foster / Elite Backgrounds 841 Background Investigation Report -
Kristan Maurer
Paid by Check
# 109329
05/12/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/22/2026 1,400.00
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,430.59 Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
12457 - Richard Harlan / Hazardous
Materials Institute LLC
1336 Fire Inspector 2A, 2B,
2C
Paid by Check
# 109351
05/20/2026 05/20/2026 05/20/2026 05/22/2026 1,500.00
Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,500.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $3,456.48 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $3,456.48 Department 250 - Fire Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $3,456.48 Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
12445 - Peninsula Ready Mix, Inc. 2078 Cement Mix Paid by Check # 109341
05/05/2026 05/13/2026 04/13/2026 05/22/2026 612.75
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $612.75 Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0177546 Pest Control - 120 Seaside Crcl. Pond
Restrooms
Paid by Check
# 109328
04/13/2026 04/24/2026 04/24/2026 05/22/2026 80.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0177346 Pest Control - 2660 5th Ave
Paid by Check
# 109328
04/08/2026 04/24/2026 04/24/2026 05/22/2026 105.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0176685 Pest Control - 2660 5th Ave
Paid by Check
# 109328
03/13/2026 04/24/2026 04/24/2026 05/22/2026 105.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0176938 Pest Control - Preston Park
Paid by Check
# 109328
03/17/2026 04/24/2026 04/24/2026 05/22/2026 180.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/21/2026 03:37:49 PM Page 4 of 10 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/22/26 - 05/22/26
4 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0176937 Preston Park Paid by Check # 109328
03/31/2026 04/24/2026 04/24/2026 05/22/2026 180.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0176780 Hilltop Park 4th Ave & 9th St
Paid by Check
# 109328
03/31/2026 04/24/2026 04/24/2026 05/22/2026 110.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0176851 Locke Paddon Park Paid by Check # 109328
03/31/2026 04/24/2026 04/24/2026 05/22/2026 450.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0176878 Marina Library Paid by Check # 109328
03/31/2026 04/24/2026 04/24/2026 05/22/2026 300.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0177065 Windyhill Park Paid by Check # 109328
03/31/2026 04/24/2026 04/24/2026 05/22/2026 125.00
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship Totals Invoice Transactions 9 $1,635.00 Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0177545 Pest Control - 211 Hillcrest Ave. CTC/2
Paid by Check
# 109328
04/06/2026 04/24/2026 04/24/2026 05/22/2026 82.00
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0178256 211 Hillcrest Avenue Paid by Check # 109328
05/06/2026 05/31/2026 04/27/2026 05/22/2026 82.00
Account 6360.440 - Maint & Repairs Landscape General Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $164.00 Account 6400.742 - Material & Suppl Sprinklers/Plants/Fertilizer 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 094044 Grounds Paid by Check # 109313
04/22/2026 05/07/2026 05/07/2026 05/22/2026 18.56
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 094048 Grounds Paid by Check # 109313
04/22/2026 05/07/2026 05/07/2026 05/22/2026 45.34
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 094090 Grounds Paid by Check # 109313
04/27/2026 05/07/2026 05/07/2026 05/22/2026 54.60
Account 6400.742 - Material & Suppl Sprinklers/Plants/Fertilizer Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $118.50 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $2,530.25 Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $2,530.25 Department 310 - Public Works Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $2,530.25 Department 410 - Planning
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.610 - Prof Svc Planning - Consultant
12447 - Deckard Technologies, Inc. INV-0889 Outreach, Registration, & Monitoring - City of
Marina
Paid by Check
# 109323
05/13/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 11,000.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/21/2026 03:37:49 PM Page 5 of 10 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/22/26 - 05/22/26
5 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 410 - Planning
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.610 - Prof Svc Planning - Consultant
11084 - EMC Planning Group 25-114-1 25-114 Reservation Road Downtown Core
Plan
Paid by Check
# 109326
04/30/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 20,403.07
Account 6300.610 - Prof Svc Planning - Consultant Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $31,403.07 Account 6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning
10508 - Regional Government Services 20597 Harvey Gas Station Planning Svcs
November 2025
Paid by EFT #
7711
11/30/2025 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/22/2026 1,050.50
Account 6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,050.50 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $32,453.57 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $32,453.57 Department 410 - Planning Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $32,453.57 Department 430 - Building Inspection
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.070 - Prof Svc Building Plan Check & Inspection 10171 - CSG Consultants 65969 Professional Services
from March 28, 2026 to
April 24, 2026
Paid by EFT #
7708
05/08/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/22/2026 12,688.00
Account 6300.070 - Prof Svc Building Plan Check & Inspection Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $12,688.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $12,688.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $12,688.00 Department 430 - Building Inspection Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $12,688.00 Department 510 - Recreation & Culture
Division 100 - Admin
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10053 - AT & T May 2026 520 5 AT&T 831-582-9957
520 5
Paid by Check
# 109314
05/13/2026 05/15/2026 05/15/2026 05/22/2026 664.14
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $664.14 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/21/2026 03:37:49 PM Page 6 of 10 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/22/26 - 05/22/26
6 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 510 - Recreation & Culture
Division 100 - Admin
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.652 - Material & Suppl Recr Special Progr / Events 12296 - Chilling + Grillin / Derek Brown 07-04-25 4th of July event Paid by Check # 109321
07/11/2025 08/11/2025 06/30/2025 05/22/2026 170.00
Account 6400.652 - Material & Suppl Recr Special Progr / Events Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $170.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $834.14 Division 100 - Admin Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $834.14 Department 510 - Recreation & Culture Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $834.14 Fund 100 - General Fund Totals Invoice Transactions 50 $251,897.60 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/21/2026 03:37:49 PM Page 7 of 10 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/22/26 - 05/22/26
7 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 220 - Gas Tax
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 202-3 PG&E - 6594070202-3 Paid by Check # 109340
05/10/2026 05/15/2026 05/15/2026 05/22/2026 145.35
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 353-7 PG&E - 9930567353-7 Paid by Check # 109340
05/08/2026 05/15/2026 05/15/2026 05/22/2026 81.82
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 582-7 PG&E - 8161432582-7 Paid by Check # 109340
05/08/2026 05/15/2026 05/15/2026 05/22/2026 191.20
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 720-0 PG&E - 0167505720-0 Paid by Check # 109340
05/10/2026 05/15/2026 05/15/2026 05/22/2026 1,279.78
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 943-2 PG&E - 6150212943-2 Paid by Check # 109340
05/08/2026 05/15/2026 05/15/2026 05/22/2026 103.10
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 535-3 PG&E - 6161832535-3 Paid by Check # 109340
05/13/2026 05/15/2026 05/15/2026 05/22/2026 318.43
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 827-8 PG&E - 0423929827-8 Paid by Check # 109340
05/13/2026 05/15/2026 05/15/2026 05/22/2026 189.67
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $2,309.35 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Apr 2026 56-
049
Imjin Rd Irrigation
Backflow 56-049
Paid by Check
# 109334
04/27/2026 05/13/2026 05/13/2026 05/22/2026 245.45
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $245.45 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $2,554.80 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $2,554.80 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $2,554.80 Fund 220 - Gas Tax Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $2,554.80 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/21/2026 03:37:49 PM Page 8 of 10 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/22/26 - 05/22/26
8 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 462 - City Capital Projects
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10268 - Harris & Associates, Inc. 70683 Imjin Parkway
Improvement Plan
Paid by EFT #
7709
01/16/2026 05/13/2026 05/13/2026 05/22/2026 93,064.45
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 35528942 2021 DEV. IMPACT FEE Paid by Check # 109330
03/31/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/22/2026 29,399.00
11084 - EMC Planning Group 24-074-17 24-074 Fort Ord Dunes State Park
Improvements - April
2026
Paid by Check
# 109326
04/30/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/22/2026 3,131.39
12199 - BEK COLLECTIVE INC / BEK

COLLECTIVE
030-010-001 Imjin Medians Apr1-
April30
Paid by Check
# 109315
05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/22/2026 5,480.00
12199 - BEK COLLECTIVE INC / BEK

COLLECTIVE
030-003-012 Marina Gateway Signs
Mar1-Mar31
Paid by Check
# 109315
04/13/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/22/2026 2,152.50
12199 - BEK COLLECTIVE INC / BEK

COLLECTIVE
030-008-007 Imjin Parkway Artwork
Mar1-Apr20
Paid by Check
# 109315
05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/22/2026 656.25
12199 - BEK COLLECTIVE INC / BEK

COLLECTIVE
030-003-013 Marina Gateway Signs
Apr1-Apr30
Paid by Check
# 109315
05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/22/2026 4,830.00
12199 - BEK COLLECTIVE INC / BEK

COLLECTIVE
030-009-004 Sea Haven City Park
Feb1-Mar31
Paid by Check
# 109315
04/13/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/22/2026 3,084.50
12171 - Butano Geotechnical Engineering,
Inc
9563 Glorya Jean Tate Park
(Phase 2)
Paid by Check
# 109317
05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/22/2026 806.25
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 35580695 IMJIN PKWY PS&E Paid by Check # 109330
04/30/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/22/2026 6,933.50
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $149,537.84 Account 6700.105 - Capital Outlay Construction
10831 - Kompan, Inc. INV137243 Glorya Jean Tate park Paid by EFT # 7710
03/25/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/22/2026 168,814.05
Account 6700.105 - Capital Outlay Construction Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $168,814.05 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 11 $318,351.89 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 11 $318,351.89 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 11 $318,351.89 Fund 462 - City Capital Projects Totals Invoice Transactions 11 $318,351.89 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/21/2026 03:37:49 PM Page 9 of 10 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/22/26 - 05/22/26
9 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 767-2 751 Neeson Rd Bldg 526 (2652040767-2)
Paid by Check
# 109340
05/10/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 103.44
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 347-0 3263 Imjin Rd Bldg 519 (625896347-0)
Paid by Check
# 109340
05/08/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 870.84
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 288-5 781 Neeson Rd Bldg 520 (7175660288-5)
Paid by Check
# 109340
05/10/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 645.50
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 608-2 3260 Imjin Rd Bldg 514 (7383993608-2)
Paid by Check
# 109340
05/10/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 1,133.94
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 103-6 3200 Imjin Rd Bldg 507 (8030427103-6)
Paid by Check
# 109340
05/08/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 3,943.97
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Mar 2026 451-7 3271 Imjin Rd Bldg 554 (8600650451-7)
Paid by Check
# 109340
03/11/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 458.64
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric Apr 2026 451-7 3271 Imjin Rd Bldg 554 (8600650451-7)
Paid by Check
# 109340
04/09/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 486.76
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 451-7 3271 Imjin Rd Bldg 554 (8600650451-7)
Paid by Check
# 109340
05/08/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/22/2026 425.49
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $8,068.58 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $8,068.58 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $8,068.58 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $8,068.58 Fund 555 - Marina Airport Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $8,068.58 Grand Totals Invoice Transactions 77 $580,872.87
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/21/2026 03:37:49 PM Page 10 of 10 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/22/26 - 05/22/26
10 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11618 - Tripepi, Smith & Associates, Inc. 16944 Ballot Measure Outreach - March 2026
Paid by Check
# 109381
03/31/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 3,836.25
11618 - Tripepi, Smith & Associates, Inc. 17122 General Account Support - April 2026
Paid by Check
# 109381
04/30/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 9,640.00
11618 - Tripepi, Smith & Associates, Inc. 17137 Ballot Measure Outreach - April 2026
Paid by Check
# 109381
04/30/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 10,266.25
11618 - Tripepi, Smith & Associates, Inc. 16930 General Account Support - March 2026
Paid by Check
# 109381
03/31/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 22,871.43
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $46,613.93 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6143219482 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by EFT #
7738
05/10/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 214.27
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $214.27 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $46,828.20 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $46,828.20 Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $46,828.20 Department 130 - Finance
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6143219482 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by EFT #
7738
05/10/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 102.90
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $102.90 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $102.90 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $102.90 Department 130 - Finance Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $102.90 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10315 - Keyser Marston Associates 0040482 Professional Services - UUT Revenue Estimate
- Jan 2026
Paid by EFT #
7727
02/09/2026 05/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 2,655.00
10315 - Keyser Marston Associates 0040568 Professional Services - UUT Revenue Estimate
- Feb. 2026
Paid by EFT #
7727
03/09/2026 05/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 2,360.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $5,015.00 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 1 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
11 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
10129 - Cintas Corporation 4270173782 Mat Service City Hall Paid by Check # 109360
05/22/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 05/29/2026 73.73
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $73.73 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000025260287 CALNET3-9391023491 (884-9654)
Paid by Check
# 109354
05/15/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 93.38
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000025260286 CALNET3-9391023490 (884-9568)
Paid by Check
# 109354
05/15/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 61.63
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000025260281 CALNET3-9391023485 (884-2573)
Paid by Check
# 109354
05/15/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 33.61
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000025260279 CALNET3-9391023482 (884-0985)
Paid by Check
# 109354
05/15/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 32.38
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $221.00 Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 683-2 PG&E 6217294683-2 Paid by Check # 109372
05/18/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 202.18
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 795-7 PG&E - 4467294795-7 Paid by Check # 109372
05/20/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 05/29/2026 588.70
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 172-2 PG&E - 5618207172-2 Paid by Check # 109372
05/19/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 05/29/2026 697.88
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $1,488.76 Account 6600.010 - Other Charges Alarm
10239 - First Alarm 955791 Alarm Monitoring -
3200 Del Monte Blvd
June-Aug 2026
Paid by EFT #
7725
05/15/2026 05/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 182.58
10239 - First Alarm 953329 Alarm Monitoring - 211
Hillcrest Ave June-Aug
2026
Paid by EFT #
7725
05/15/2026 05/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 113.67
Account 6600.010 - Other Charges Alarm Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $296.25 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $7,094.74 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $7,094.74 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $7,094.74 Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10107 - California Towing & Transport 214868 TOWING SERVICE CALL #275340242
Paid by Check
# 109358
05/05/2026 06/04/2026 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 150.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 2 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
12 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
12441 - Randolph B. Means / Randy Means
& Associates, LLC
1817 Policy Manual Review -
Risk Review
Paid by Check
# 109373
04/20/2026 05/20/2026 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 9,950.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $10,100.00 Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building
10239 - First Alarm 955794 MONITORING SERVICE
& DAILY TIMER TEST
Paid by EFT #
7725
05/15/2026 06/01/2026 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 218.82
Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $218.82 Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 229084 Janitorial Service
Police/Fire/Airport May
2026
Paid by EFT #
7723
05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 1,308.00
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,308.00 Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip
12444 - Daren C. Schofield/Pipe Down Law
Enforcement Train
148 PIPE DOWN ALL IN

ONE ENFORCEMENT
KIT
Paid by Check
# 109361
04/13/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 1,737.08
Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,737.08 Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
12444 - Daren C. Schofield/Pipe Down Law
Enforcement Train
149 EXHAUST

ENFORCEMENT

TRAINING
Paid by Check
# 109361
04/13/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 1,050.00
Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,050.00 Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking
12070 - Open Road Investors, LLC 1126 Monthly Parking Lot Rent
Paid by Check
# 109371
05/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 1,600.00
Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,600.00 Account 6600.465 - Other Charges Live Scan
10193 - California Department of Justice 042251 LIVE SCANS Paid by Check # 109356
05/05/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 241.00
Account 6600.465 - Other Charges Live Scan Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $241.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $16,254.90 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $16,254.90 Department 210 - Police Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $16,254.90 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 3 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
13 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126213 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
205 Mollusk Circle
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126214 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
206 Horizon Drive
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126215 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
208 Horizon Drive
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126216 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
210 Horizon Drive
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126218 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
2305 Mollusk Drive
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126219 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
2303 Mollusk Circle
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126220 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
2301 Mollusk Circle
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126212 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
207 Mollusk Circle
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126211 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
209 Mollusk Circle
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126210 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
211 Mollusk Circle
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126209 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
204 Horizon Drive
Paid by EFT #
7721
05/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 230.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 11 $2,530.00 Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 229084 Janitorial Service
Police/Fire/Airport May
2026
Paid by EFT #
7723
05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 517.00
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $517.00 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 4 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
14 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
12394 - Witmer Public Safety Group, Inc INV895890 Two Man Hose Roller Paid by Check # 109380
05/19/2026 05/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 451.29
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $451.29 Account 6400.795 - Material & Suppl Turnout Equip-Structure Fires 10323 - L.N. Curtis & Sons INV1060774 PPE Inspections Paid by EFT # 7729
04/21/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 3,220.70
Account 6400.795 - Material & Suppl Turnout Equip-Structure Fires Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $3,220.70 Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking
12070 - Open Road Investors, LLC 1126 Monthly Parking Lot Rent
Paid by Check
# 109371
05/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 400.00
Account 6600.455 - Other Charges Leased Parking Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $400.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $7,118.99 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $7,118.99 Department 250 - Fire Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $7,118.99 Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.040 - Maint & Repairs Backflow Preventers
11099 - Sabre Backflow LLC 5337 Backflow kit Paid by Check # 109375
02/27/2026 04/09/2026 04/09/2026 05/29/2026 147.04
Account 6360.040 - Maint & Repairs Backflow Preventers Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $147.04 Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
12435 - ASSOCIATED HEATING, AIR

CONDITIONING/ASSOCIATED SE
145678 City of Marina 209
Cypress Ave Marina, CA
93933
Paid by Check
# 109353
01/15/2026 05/07/2026 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 360.00
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $360.00 Account 6360.075 - Maint & Repairs Bdg Teen Center
12435 - ASSOCIATED HEATING, AIR

CONDITIONING/ASSOCIATED SE
145926 City of Marina 304
Hillcrest Ave
Paid by Check
# 109353
03/18/2026 05/07/2026 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 778.50
Account 6360.075 - Maint & Repairs Bdg Teen Center Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $778.50 Account 6360.315 - Maint & Repairs HVAC
12435 - ASSOCIATED HEATING, AIR

CONDITIONING/ASSOCIATED SE
146101 Walter Giracca 211
Hillcrest Ave Marina,
CA 93933
Paid by Check
# 109353
05/04/2026 05/07/2026 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 180.00
Account 6360.315 - Maint & Repairs HVAC Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $180.00 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 5 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
15 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
12269 - ALK Services, Inc. / American Lock
and Key
1-22513 Keys Paid by Check
# 109352
05/27/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 05/29/2026 40.70
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $40.70 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $1,506.24 Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $1,506.24 Division 313 - Vehicle Maint
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
10331 - LEHR Upfitters OpCo, LLC / LEHR /
Lehr Auto
SI132343 Setina Seat Belt
Retractor
Paid by EFT #
7731
05/12/2026 05/13/2026 05/13/2026 05/29/2026 369.58
Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $369.58 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $369.58 Division 313 - Vehicle Maint Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $369.58 Department 310 - Public Works Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $1,875.82 Department 410 - Planning
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.610 - Prof Svc Planning - Consultant
10508 - Regional Government Services 20830 Special Event Permit Ordinance January
2026
Paid by EFT #
7736
01/31/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 382.00
10508 - Regional Government Services 20833 Marina Land Use Planning Svcs January
2026
Paid by EFT #
7736
01/31/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 1,337.00
10508 - Regional Government Services 21124 Marina Land Use Planning Svcs March
2026
Paid by EFT #
7736
03/31/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 382.00
10508 - Regional Government Services 21126 Special Event Permit Ordinance March 2026
Paid by EFT #
7736
03/31/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 1,719.00
Account 6300.610 - Prof Svc Planning - Consultant Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $3,820.00 Account 6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning
10713 - Goodwin Consulting Group 14543 Marina Station CFD 2026-1 Formation
Svcs.-Nov. 2025-Feb
2026
Paid by EFT #
7726
02/25/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 15,770.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 6 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
16 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 410 - Planning
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning
10171 - CSG Consultants 65645 Mercedes Fee
Agreement-
Unstoppable
Automotive
Paid by EFT #
7724
04/10/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 8,636.00
10508 - Regional Government Services 20598 Harvey Hotel Planning Svcs November 2025
Paid by EFT #
7736
11/30/2025 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 1,050.50
10508 - Regional Government Services 20933 Dunes Planning Svcs February 2026
Paid by EFT #
7736
02/28/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 955.00
Account 6330.100 - Fee Agr Costs - Planning Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $26,411.50 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6143219482 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by EFT #
7738
05/10/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 89.81
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $89.81 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 9 $30,321.31 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 9 $30,321.31 Department 410 - Planning Totals Invoice Transactions 9 $30,321.31 Department 430 - Building Inspection
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6143219482 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by EFT #
7738
05/10/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 51.50
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $51.50 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $51.50 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $51.50 Department 430 - Building Inspection Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $51.50 Fund 100 - General Fund Totals Invoice Transactions 57 $109,648.36 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 7 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
17 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 220 - Gas Tax
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 683-2 PG&E 6217294683-2 Paid by Check # 109372
05/18/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 1,382.48
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 362-9 PG&E - 5996678362-9 Paid by Check # 109372
05/19/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 05/29/2026 191.01
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,573.49 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,573.49 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,573.49 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,573.49 Fund 220 - Gas Tax Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,573.49 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 8 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
18 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 251 - CFD - Locke Paddon
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 272-1 PG&E - 2862559272-1 Paid by Check # 109372
05/18/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 67.01
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $67.01 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $67.01 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $67.01 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $67.01 Fund 251 - CFD - Locke Paddon Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $67.01 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 9 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
19 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 462 - City Capital Projects
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10425 - Monterey Peninsula Engineering 26-04-05 RET Preston Park Upgrade Project
Paid by Check
# 109368
05/13/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 8,243.71
10425 - Monterey Peninsula Engineering 26-04-04 Preston Park Upgrade Project
Paid by Check
# 109368
05/13/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 4,300.02
10230 - EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS

INC / EWING OUTDOOR SUPP
29477007 SAM/VINCE

DIMAGGIO PARK
Paid by Check
# 109363
03/19/2026 05/07/2026 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 886.47
10230 - EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS

INC / EWING OUTDOOR SUPP
30173063 VINCE DIMAGGIO
PARK
Paid by Check
# 109363
05/07/2026 05/07/2026 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 475.52
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 34393277 Dunes & 2nd Paid by Check # 109364
12/31/2025 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 05/29/2026 4,942.35
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 34666679 Dunes & 2nd Paid by Check # 109364
01/31/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 05/29/2026 2,409.98
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $21,258.05 Account 6700.105 - Capital Outlay Construction
10831 - Kompan, Inc. INV137404 Gloria Jean Tate Park Paid by EFT # 7728
03/30/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 777,501.99
Account 6700.105 - Capital Outlay Construction Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $777,501.99 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $798,760.04 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $798,760.04 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $798,760.04 Fund 462 - City Capital Projects Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $798,760.04 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 10 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
20 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building
11424 - California Fire Protection Inc. 20-19253 20 lb ABC Extinguisher teardown
Paid by Check
# 109357
05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 130.00
11424 - California Fire Protection Inc. 20-18939 FE Annual Service Paid by Check # 109357
03/30/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 1,441.44
10239 - First Alarm 942727 3200 Imjin Rd Bldg 507 Paid by EFT # 7725
03/15/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 303.87
10239 - First Alarm 950316 721 Neeson Rd Alarm
Systems
Paid by EFT #
7725
04/15/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 438.66
10239 - First Alarm 950315 3240 Imjin Rd Bldg 510 Paid by EFT # 7725
04/15/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 538.89
Account 6360.050 - Maint & Repairs Building Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $2,852.86 Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 229084 Janitorial Service
Police/Fire/Airport May
2026
Paid by EFT #
7723
05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 410.00
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $410.00 Account 6360.450 - Maint & Repairs Maint & Repairs
10356 - Marina Plumbing 55082 Plumbing Service at
761 Neeson Rd.

Paid by Check
# 109366
05/11/2026 06/11/2026 05/01/2026 05/29/2026 900.00
Account 6360.450 - Maint & Repairs Maint & Repairs Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $900.00 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6143219482 Monthly Verizon Bill- 308174766
Paid by EFT #
7738
05/10/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 89.81
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $89.81 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000025155428 AWOS (9391023449) Paid by Check # 109354
04/28/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 33.89
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000025155422 Fire Alarms HGR 524 & 533 (939102443)
Paid by Check
# 109354
04/28/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 62.26
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000025155423 Fire Alarms HGR 524 & 533 (939102444)
Paid by Check
# 109354
04/28/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 62.26
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $158.41 Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10463 - Pacific Gas & Electric May 2026 683-2 PG&E 6217294683-2 Paid by Check # 109372
05/18/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 426.30
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $426.30 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Feb 2026 56-
051
721 Neeson Rd Bldg
533 (56-051)
Paid by Check
# 109365
02/25/2026 05/14/2026 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 265.58
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $265.58 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 11 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
21 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.231 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Aviation 100LL 12099 - Ascent Aviation Group Inc 1196741 100LL Fuel Paid by EFT # 7722
04/23/2026 05/11/2026 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 45,408.73
Account 6400.231 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Aviation 100LL Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $45,408.73 Account 6400.232 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Aviation Jet A 12099 - Ascent Aviation Group Inc 1200136 Jet A Fuel Delivery Paid by EFT # 7722
05/06/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 05/29/2026 43,489.59
Account 6400.232 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Aviation Jet A Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $43,489.59 Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
11691 - Tevita Tulua - Employee 07-06-25 Safety Boots
Reimbursement
Paid by Check
# 109378
07/06/2025 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 245.76
10043 - VESTIS GROUP, INC./(f/k/a

ARAMARK UNIFORM & C
5110892776 Dave's Uniform & First
Aid Kit
Paid by Check
# 109379
05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 40.54
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $286.30 Account 6600.452 - Other Charges Leased Copier
11451 - Monterey Bay Office Products - US
Bank
579201815 Airport Lease Copier-
March 2026
Paid by Check
# 109367
04/05/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 109.96
11451 - Monterey Bay Office Products - US
Bank
581489689 Airport Copier Lease-
May 2026
Paid by Check
# 109367
05/05/2026 05/08/2026 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 110.29
Account 6600.452 - Other Charges Leased Copier Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $220.25 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 19 $94,507.83 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 19 $94,507.83 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 19 $94,507.83 Fund 555 - Marina Airport Totals Invoice Transactions 19 $94,507.83 Grand Totals Invoice Transactions 86 $1,004,556.73
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 05/28/2026 01:59:41 PM Page 12 of 12 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 05/29/26 - 05/29/26
22 Agenda Item: 10b(1)
City Council Meeting of
June 2, 2026
ACTION

MINUTES
Tuesday, May 5, 2026 5:00 P.M. Closed Session
6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR

AGENCY OF THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).

Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
AND
Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM: (City Council, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonprofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Members and Marina Groundwater Sustainability Agency) MEMBER PRESENT: Jenny McAdams, Brian McCarthy, Kathy Biala, Mayor Pro- Tem/Vice Chair Liesbeth Visscher, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS:

4. CLOSED SESSION:
a. Real Property Negotiation (Govt. Code Section 54956.8) i. Property: Locke-Paddon Park, various parcels, APN Nos.: 033-121-004, 033-121-005-006, 033-132-003, 033-132-003, 033-121-101, 033- 121009, 033-121-002
Negotiating Party: Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
b. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation (§ 54956.9(d)(1)) case(s) i. Application of California-American Water Company (U210W), Application 21-11-024, California Public Utilities Commission. 7:25 PM - RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN

CLOSED SESSION
1 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Page 2

5. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. Mental Health Month Proclamation
b. Building Safety Month Proclamation

7. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS:
• Councilmember McAdams encouraged all the residents to vote at the June 2, 2026, election.

There are some important positions to be voted on. So please vote

8. PUBLIC COMMENT: Any member of the public may comment on any matter within the City Council’s jurisdiction that is not on the agenda. This is the appropriate place to comment on items on the Consent Agenda. Action will not be taken on items not on the agenda. Comments are limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. General public comment may be limited to thirty (30) minutes and/or continued to the end of the agenda. Any member of the public may comment on any matter listed on this agenda at the time the matter is being considered by the City Council. Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.
• Cyan Trundle indicated that the Sierra Club, supports diversity, equity, inclusion, and getting people outside which is they’ve pledged $100,000 for the Asian American Gardens. It's been more than 2 years and 16 meetings, not sure what's taking so long. We don't need more research or outreach. The people have already spoken.
• Greg Furey spoke about attending a meeting at the Springhill Suite about a year ago where we were talking about money, and how to improve services. Suggested council look at consolidating your fire services. Spoke about Riverside County having CalFire staff trained as paramedics on each engine. Why doesn’t Marina have that.

9. CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Background information has been provided to the Successor Agency of the former Redevelopment Agency on all matters listed under the Consent Agenda, and these items are considered to be routine and non -controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda are normally approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of the public or City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, the Council may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. If an item is pulled for discussion, it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency.

10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and non-controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda may be approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, Council may remove the item from the Consent Agenda and it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items.
a. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) 2 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Page 3

(1) Accounts Payable Check Numbers 109092-109168, totaling $719,264.05 Accounts Payable Successor Agency Check No. 138-139, totaling $44,090.75 b. MINUTES: None
c. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: None
d. AWARD OF BID: None
e. CALL FOR BIDS: None
f. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026-47, approving the lease of three (3) new Ford Interceptors with Unified Fleet Services.
h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: None
i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE): None
k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS: None
l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING): None
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS: None
Councilmember McCarthy had question for agenda item 10g(1) asked if the city would own the vehicles after the lease term
Mayor Delgado had question for agenda item 10g(1) asked if payment for vehicles were coming from the Vehicle Reserves.

MCADAMS/VISSCHER: TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA . 5 -0-0-0 Motion Passes

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS: In the Council’s discretion, the applicant/proponent of an item may be given up to ten (10) minutes to speak. All other persons may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak on the matter.
a. Open public hearing and introducing Ordinance No. 20 26-05, adopting the proposed amendments to Section 17.42.170 Short -Term Rentals (STR) of the Marina Municipal Code; and find that adoption of the ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Councilmember McCarthy recused himself from this item, due to conflict Public Comments:
• Sean McDonald suggested changes that for the STR permit holders with an ADU permitted prior to 2020 to be able to rent the main home and ADU both concurrently and at separate times, and also not be limited to the 180-day.
3 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Page 4

• Athena Burciaga supports the overall direction of this ordinance, strengthening Marina's short-term program but opposes the carve out that would exempt ADU approved before January 1, 2020, from the STR prohibition. The pre-2020 carve out undermines that goal. • Brian McCarthy agrees previous speaker had good points that should be considered. Council should consider people's individual circumstances. Thinks Council and the Planning Commission have really been thoughtful about how to implement some provisions that make enforcement a lot easier. Urges the council to move forward and not draw it out any longer.

Council discussed current number of ADU’s in Marina built prior to 2020 and 180-day limit.

MCADAMS/VISSCHER: TO APPROVE INTRODUCING ORDINANCE NO. 2026 -05, ADOPTING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 17.42.170 SHORT -TERM RENTALS (STR) OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE; AND FIND THAT

ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES . 3-1(Delgado)-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

12. OTHER ACTIONS ITEMS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY : Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The Successor Agency may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

13. OTHER ACTION ITEMS: Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The City Council may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

Note: No additional major projects or programs should be undertaken without review of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006). a. Adopting Resolution 2026 -48, authorizing staff to issue a request for proposals (RFP) for landscape architectural design services for an Asian American Garden at Locke -Paddon Park and authorize staff to solicit proposals and return to Council with a recommended consultant. Continued from April 21, 2026
Public Comments:
• Sophia Rome spoke of growing up in this community, working for the City of Salinas and a similar project with Carr Lake. Commented on the importance of ensuring that whoever is selected and the evaluation process is somebody that truly understands what an Asian American garden should look like, and what each element truly represents . In support of the RFP.
• Steve Lee urged council to issue this RFP for the design of the Asian American Botanical Garden and do its part to move along the process with the Parks District and to continue the public process of designing this garden and ultimately start the CEQA process. • Grace Silva-Santella expressed her concern that Locke Paddon Park is not the right location for a project that has plant material as environmentally sensitive as an Asian themed garden.

Asked if the RFP is limited to the Locke Paddon and Wetland Park site? Are other sites in Marina considered for this Asian? Suggested the landscape architects should have a resume that shows successful projects that are thriving in environments similar to Locke Paddon. 4 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Page 5

Council discussed including the Food Forest and Children’s Sensory Garden in the RFP as separate projects. Survival of plant materials over a length of time.

MCCARTHY/BIALA: THAT WE APPROVE THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING

STAFF TO ISSUE A RFP FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES

FOR AN ASIAN AMERICAN GARDEN AT LOCKE PADDON PARK, AND

AUTHORIZE STAFF TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND RETURN TO THE COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDED CONSULTANT; AND

1. THAT THAT RFP INCLUDE SOME MORE STRONGER LANGUAGE THAT

THE CONSULTANT WILL MAKE A DETERMINATION WHETHER THE
PLANT MATERIAL IS LIKELY TO SURVIVE OVER A 10 -YEAR
TIMEFRAME.

2. TO ALSO INCLUDE 2 ADDITIONAL RFP’S FOR THE FOOD FOREST AND THE SENSORY CHILDREN'S GARDEN; AND

3. ASK THEM FOR A PLANT PALETTE OF A SPECIES THAT ARE LIKELY TO

THRIVE IN THIS ENVIRONMENT RATHER THAN HAVING THEM
PREDICT THE FUTURE OF PLANTS THAT WON'T SURVIVE.
5-0-0-0 Motion Passes

b. Receive an informational update regarding city facilities and potential November ballot measure; and Provide direction for city staff. Continued from April 21, 2026
Public Comments:
• Steve Zmak commented on monies already spent on this ballot measure and what was spent in 2024, which the measure failed. A UUT would negatively impact on lower incomes more dramatically than higher incomes. Oppose any new tax measure going to the public.

Council discussed forwarding a letter from a member of the public that presents interesting questions to the consultant to get some of them answered.

c. Presentation by Marina Police Department on the 2025 Firework Impacts; and planned Firework activities for July 2026. Continued from April 21, 2026 Public Comments:
• Erika Graham, Marina High School Athletic Booster Club spoke about the income generated from the sale Safe N Sane Fireworks for the non -profit organizations and the city. Supports Option B
• Tim McNew, Marina Youth Soccer, emphasized the importance of the fundraising from the booths each year, which makes the programs affordable to the community. • Jerrica, Marina Youth Baseball Softball Board stated that the Firework booths are the biggest means of raising money for keeping costs affordable for the community. Agrees that the enhanced enforcement option would benefit the community. 5 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Page 6

• Denise Turley asked if the city could make sure flyers are sent to the Abrams and Preston Park housing area on the Fourth of July festivities. Suggested that the non-profits investigate other items to do fundraising with.
• Steve Zmak spoke about what the detonations do to the family pets. Asked what level of enforcement is there for New Year's Eve? How many citations were issued for fireworks on all the other days other than the 4th of July? Going to low noise and noiseless still allows our service clubs to conduct their annual fundraising. Suggested a full firework ban, or at the very minimum, option C.
• Mike Moeller does not see a benefit to banning Safe N Sane fireworks, it's obvious that the illegal fireworks are the real problem. Noted that you're taking away a significant amount of funding for sports programs.
• Dennis Revell noted that the illegal fireworks enforcement in California has become probably one of the most innovative areas in police and fire enforcement throughout the state. Commented on Salinas and Sacramento using city employees to document social host ordinance violations.

d. Receive a presentation on past amendments to the Council Rules, (2) further amendments and refinements to such Rules; and (3) providing direction to City Attorney and Staff on other refinements or amendments to such Rules .

Continued to May 19, 2026
e. Sign Ordinance -Window Covering Update and possible council direction .

Continued to May 19, 2026
.

14. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council reports on meetings and conferences attended ( Gov’t Code Section 53232).

Mayor Delgado announced that he would not be seeking re-election for the seat of mayor in November

15. ADJOURNMENT: The regular meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M.

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

ATTEST:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
6 May 28, 2026 Item No. 10e(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the Marina City Council June 2, 2026

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 26-,

APPROVING ADVERTISING AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE DEL MONTE

BOULEVARD AND BEACH ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 2026-, approving advertising and call for bids for the Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road Intersection Improvements Project.

BACKGROUND:

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has developed a comprehensive Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) that defines goals, objectives, and strategies to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The SHSP requires collab oration with law enforcement, educators, emergency services, and other stakeholders and is a major component of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).

The HSIP is a Federal-aid program that incorporates a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety that focuses on performance. Supporting safety improvement projects consistent with the State’s SHSP, the HSIP finances projects specifically targeting roadway and intersection locations by identifying and implementing countermeasures to improve safety.

A Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) is the local Municipality version of the State SHSP, providing a framework for organizing stakeholders to identify, analyze, and prioritize roadway safety improvements on local and rural roads. The process of developing an LRSP can be tailored to local protocols, needs, and issues. However, safety projects stemming from the plan need to be consistent with Federal and State project funding requirements if those funds will be used for project implementation. Also, the plan shou ld be viewed as a living document that can be continually reviewed and updated to reflect changing local needs and priorities.

On May 4 , 2021, City Council passed resolution 2021 -37 approving a Caltrans LRSP grant application. The City subsequently received a $40,000 grant, which along with the $5,000 City matching funds paid for the preparation of the LRSP. Staff issued a work order to Kimley-Horn to produce the LRSP under the on-call professional services agreement.

At the regular meeting of August 16, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -108, approving the Local Roadway Safety Plan and the recommended safety improvement projects.

Two of those improvement projects were the Imjin Pkwy & 3rd Ave intersection and the Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd intersection.

The City proceeded to apply for HSIP Grant funding for these two projects as part of the 2023 Grant Cycle 11. Both projects were awarded Grant funding with Preliminary Engineering funding at the end of 2023.

At the regular meeting of December 17, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-144, approving an agreement with Kimley Horn and Associates to provide engineering services for the Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road Intersection Improvements Project see EXHIBIT A

1 On March 5, 2026, City staff submitted a request for allocation of State funds to Caltrans from the HSIP for the Del Monte Blvd and Beach Road Intersection Improvements Construction Phase in the amount of $387,030.00, see EXHIBIT B.

On April 2, 2026 Caltrans approved the City’s allocation request and has approved City to proceed with the construction phase of the project.

ANALYSIS:

The improvements are designed to reduce the entry speed of northbound vehicles as they enter the roundabout. Road geometry improvements such as terminal vista grading, bollards, striping improvements, a chicane, and signage are included.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to calling for bids. The current budget for this project is approximately $534,900 for all phases of work; Planning, Design, and Construction . The project’s budget is funded with State Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant Funds and Regional Surface Transportation Program funds. Additional funds may be requested from the General Fund pending the result of the bid process.

CEQA Findings:

The proposed action , approving advertising and call for bids, is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), which excludes “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical c hanges in the environment.” Further, t he City has determined the Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road intersection improvement project is exempt from environmental review per § 15301(b) of the CEQA Guidelines for Existing Facilities.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action. See Exhibit B for the project Location and Cover Sheet.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Scott Shepard
City Engineer
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

APPROVING ADVERTISING AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE FOR THE

DEL MONTE BOULEVARD AND BEACH ROAD INTERSECTION

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has developed a comprehensive Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) that defines goals, objectives, and strategies to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The SHSP requires collabo ration with law enforcement, educators, emergency services, and other stakeholders and is a major component of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and;

WHEREAS, the HSIP is a Federal-aid program that incorporates a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety that focuses on performance. Supporting safety improvement projects consistent with the State’s SHSP, the HSIP finances projects specifically t argeting roadway and intersection locations by identifying and implementing countermeasures to improve safety, and;

WHEREAS, a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) is the local Municipality version of the State SHSP, providing a framework for organizing stakeholders to identify, analyze, and prioritize roadway safety improvements on local and rural roads. The process of developing an LRSP can be tailored to local protocols, needs, and issues. However, safety projects stemming from the plan need to be consistent with Federal and State project funding requirements if those funds will be used for project implementation. Also, the plan should be viewed as a living document that can be continually reviewed and updated to reflect changing local needs and priorities, and;

WHEREAS, on May 4th, 2021, City Council passed resolution 2021-37 approving a Caltrans LRSP grant application. The City subsequently received a $40,000 grant, which along with the $5,000 City matching funds paid for the preparation of the LRSP. Staff issued a work order to Kimley- Horn to produce the LRSP under the on-call professional services agreement, and;

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of August 16, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-108, approving the Local Roadway Safety Plan and the recommended safety improvement projects. Two of those improvement projects were the Imjin Pkwy & 3rd Ave intersection and the Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd intersection, and;

WHEREAS, the City proceeded to apply for HSIP Grant funding for these two projects as part of the 2023 Grant Cycle 11. Both projects were awarded Grant funding with Preliminary Engineering funding at the end of 2023, and;

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of December 17, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-144, approving an agreement with Kimley Horn and Associates to provide engineering services for the Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road Intersection Improvements Project, and;

WHEREAS, the improvements are designed to reduce the entry speed of northbound vehicles as they enter the roundabout. Road geometry improvements such as terminal vista grading, bollards, striping improvements, a chicane, and signage are included, and;

WHEREAS, on March 5 th, 2026 City staff submitted a request of allocation of State funds to Caltrans from the HSIP for the Del Monte Blvd and Beach Road Intersection Improvements Construction Phase in the amount of $387,030.00, and;

3 Resolution No. 2026-

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, On April 2nd, 2026 Caltrans approved the City’s allocation request and has approved City to proceed with the construction phase of the project, and;

WHEREAS, there is no fiscal impact to calling for bids. The current budget for this project is approximately $534,900. The project’s budget is funded with State Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant Funds and Regional Surface Transportation Program funds, and;

WHEREAS, the City has determined the project exempt from environmental review per § 15301(b) of the CEQA Guidelines for Existing Facilities, and;

WHEREAS, the project is ready for advertisement.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby approve advertising and call for bids for the Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road Intersection Improvements Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, duly held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

____________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 ®
Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

CITY OF MARINA

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

DEL MONTE BOULEVARD AND BEACH ROAD
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 9

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

DEL MONTE BOULEVARD AND BEACH ROAD

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

CITY OF MARINA, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TO BE SUPPLEMENTED BY THE CITY OF MARINA STANDARD PLANS DATED 2006, CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS DATED 2024, AND CALIFORNIA MUTCD DATED 2014, REVISION 9

SHEET NUMBER AND TITLES

PROJECT
SITE

COVER SHEET
1 CV-01

SYMBOLCODEDESCRIPTION
ROCK BLANKET, 4"-8" DIAM. LODI ROCK,BY GRANITE ROCK OR
APPROVED EQUAL, SEE DETAIL 1, THIS SHEET
EXTG CONC. DEMO AND REMOVE
1 2

REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
0feet 40 2060

BEACH DR

DEL MONTE BLVD
31'-0"
35'-8"
2'-0"
2'-0"
R5'-6"
R61'-4"
R104'-10"
R63'-2"
R14'-8"

NEW CURB,

SEE CIVIL PLANS
R71'-2"

NEW CURB,

SEE CIVIL PLANS
EXISTING CONC.

TO REMAIN,

PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING CONC.

TO REMAIN,

PROTECT IN PLACE
R24'-3"
R155'-9"
GENERAL NOTES:

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ON DRAWINGS REQUIRING CLARIFICATION BEFORE COMMENCING WITH WORK.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE TO REMAIN AND SECURE PROPERTY DURING CONSTRUCTION.

3. VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND UTILITIES IN THE FIELD. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES THAT MAY OCCUR.

4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES (ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND) AND PROTECT FROM DAMAGE.

5. ALL DIMENSIONS FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BEFORE CUSTOM FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW WORK.

EXISTING TREES, UNLESS NOTED ON THE LEGEND.

4. NO ROOT PRUNING OF TREE ROOTS OVER TWO INCHES (2") IN DIAMETER IS PERMITTED UNLESS DISCUSSED WITH AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST.

5. AT NO TIME SHALL THE CONTRACTOR BE PERMITTED TO CLEAN, RINSE, OR STORE EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, OR VEHICLES WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE OF TREES TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE.

6. PRIOR TO REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED CURBS OR CONCRETE, IDENTIFY ALL ROOTS 3" OR GREATER IN DIAMETER (FOR TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN) THAT WILL REQUIRE ROOT PRUNING AND NOTIFY THE CITY ARBORIST. ROOT PRUNING WILL NOT TAKE PLACE WITHOUT PRIOR CONSENT OF THE PROJECT ARBORIST.

7. ALL AT AND ABOVE GRADE EXISTING NON-PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION PIPE, HEADS, AND RISERS SHALL BE REMOVED. PROTECT ABANDONED IN-PLACE EXISTING SLEEVED PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION UNDER PAVING. DEMOLISH VALVES AND BRASS APPURTENANCES AND RECYCLE AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY REPRESENTATIVE. EXISTING LATERALS MUST BE CUT AND DISPOSED OF.

8. SAW CUTS OF EXISTING CONCRETE OR CURB SHALL BE STRAIGHT AND TRUE. CHIPS AND SPALLS TO BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE.

9. EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT, UTILITY BOXES AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PER PLAN.

10. RUNOFF FROM EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE WASHING SHALL BE CONTAINED AT CONSTRUCTION SITES UNLESS TREATED TO REMOVE SEDIMENTS AND POLLUTANTS.

11. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM WASHING CONCRETE TRUCKS OR EQUIPMENT FROM SITE AND DISPOSE OF LEGALLY.

12. SEDIMENTS FROM AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETAINED ON SITE, USING STRUCTURAL DRAINAGE CONTROLS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL. STOCKPILES OF SOIL SHALL BE PROPERLY CONTAINED TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE TO STREETS, DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES VIA RUNOFF, VEHICLE TRACKING, OR WIND.

13. REPORT ANY PLAN DISCREPANCIES TO CITY REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ALTERING THE CONDITION.

14. BASE MATERIAL UNDER CONCRETE SHALL BE MACHINE COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION (TYPICAL). 1 1
2 2
2 2

DEMO AND REMOVE
EXTG. CURB

DEMO AND REMOVE
EXTG. CURB
12'-8"
7'-2"
2'-7"

ROCK BLANKET
1/2" 1'-0"
1 2
3 5
6 4
2 2%
2%
7 8
2500 P.S.I., 4" THICK CONCRETE SUB BASE4
5 SUBGRADE. COMPACT 95%6
EXISTING ASPHALT7
NEW CURB, SEE CIVIL8
5 SET COBBLE +/- 1" MORTAR SETTING BED
1 3215-01

SYMBOLCODEDESCRIPTION
ROCK BLANKET, 4"-8" DIAM. LODI ROCK,BY GRANITE ROCK OR
APPROVED EQUAL, SEE DETAIL 1, THIS SHEET
EXTG CONC. DEMO AND REMOVE
1 2

REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE

EXHIBIT A TO STAFF REPORT
5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Division of Local Assistance
1120 N STREET
P.O. BOX 942874, MS# 1
Sacramento, CA 94274-0001
TTY 711
File : 05-MON-0-MRNA
HSIPSL-5416(013)
Del Monte Blvd and Beach Rd
Roundabout Safety
ImprovementsApril 2, 2026
Mr. Edrie De Los Santos
Senior Engineer
City of Marina
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, CA 93933
Dear Mr. De Los Santos:

Your letter dated March 05, 2026 requested an allocation of State funds from the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) project (project location: Del Monte Blvd and Beach Rd Roundabout). The State hereby makes the allocation in the amount of $387,030.00 of State funds for Construction phase of this project effective April 02, 2026. You may now proceed with the Construction phase of the project. Any work for the Construction phase that has been approved for funding and is performed after this date will be eligible for reimbursement. Please refer to the Finance Letter for the complete approved funding of all phases for this project.

All projects require a Master Agreement and Program Supplement Agreement to be in place prior to the payment of project invoices. If one has not already been executed, this office will soon send you a Program Supplement Agreement and Master Agreement for execution. Please do not submit invoices for this project until the agreements are fully executed by both you and the State.

Invoices are to be submitted at a minimum of every six (6) months in order to remain active.

If you have any questions, please contact your District Local Assistance Engineer.

Sincerely,
for MISTY BRADSHAW, Division Chief
Office of Project Management Oversight - South
Division of Local Assistance
c: DLA AE Project Files
(05) DLAE - Cori Marsalek
Local Program Accounting
HQ HSIP Manager - Richard Ke
Program
Phase Request Date Request Amount Allocation
HSIPS Construction 03/05/2026 $387,030.00 04/02/2026 6 May 22, 2026 Item No. 10e(2)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the Marina City Council June 2, 2026

RECOMMENDATION TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 26-,

APPROVING ADVERTISING AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE

CONSTRUCTION OF THE WINDY HILL PARK RESTROOM

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider

1. Adopting Resolution No. 20 26-, approving advertising and a call for bids for the construction of the Windy Hill Park Restroom Improvements Project.

BACKGROUND:

City Council previously approved Capital Improvement Project QLP 2112, allocating $1,435,000 for the purchase and installation of playground equipment, playground surfacing, and construction of new restroom facilities at Windy Hill Park.

At the Regular City Council Meeting of August 7, 2024, City Council Approved an agreement with KOMPAN California, Inc. for the purchase and installation of Playground Equipment and Surface Materials for Windy Hill Park.

The playground equipment installation and playground surfacing have been completed and the grand opening of the new playground area occurred on June 7, 2025.

At the Regular City Council Meeting of April 15, 2025, City Council approved a professional services agreement with Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc. of Fresno, CA for engineering and land surveying services, for a not to exceed amount of $49,000 for the design of the Windy Hill Park restroom facilities.

At the Regular City Council Meeting of August 6, 2025 , City Council approved the purchase of the Windy Hill Park Prefabricated Restroom Facility from the Public Restroom Company of Winden NV for $298,453.00.

The improvement plans, which include the building foundation and pad, sidewalk improvements, and utility improvements for restroom fixtures are now complete and ready for advertisement.

ANALYSIS:

The City has been prioritizing the improvement and construction of park facilities. The Windy Hill Park improvements are a small portion of the overall park improvement project works the city has been undertaking at Glorya Jean Tate, Sea Haven City Park, D unes City Park, Hilltop Park, and Windy Hill Park.

During the design and building department review of the Windy Hill Restroom Improvements the project team highlighted areas of the existing facility that needed to be retrofitted to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Pubic Right of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG). This delayed the design process and delivery of the Restroom Facility. The current schedule shows Restroom Delivery in August 2026. The restroom facility is under a critical schedule with the foundation pad and utility st ub ups for sewer, water, electrical, etc. requiring completion before the prefabricated restroom facility is delivered. 1 FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to calling for bids.

CEQA Findings:

The proposed action, approving advertising and call for bids, is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), which excludes “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.” Further, the City has determined the Windy Hill Park Restroom Improvements Project exempt from environmental review per § 15303(e) of the CEQA Guidelines.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action. See EXHIBIT A for the project Location and Cover Sheet.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Scott Shepard
City Engineer
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

Exhibits:

Exhibit A – Windy Hill Park Improvement Plans Cover Sheet 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF MAIRNA

APPROVING ADVERTISING AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE FOR THE

CONSTRUCTION OF THE WINDY HILL PARK RESTROOM

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City of Marina has a long-standing goal of improving all public parks within the city, recognizing their importance for the community’s quality of life, and;

WHEREAS, the Recreation and Community Services Commission, in it’s 2003 annual report identified the construction of permanent restroom facilities at Windy Hill Park as a priority, and;

WHEREAS, The City’s Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan, adopted on June 21, 2005, highlighted the necessity of restroom facilities at Windy Hill Park to better serve families with small children, and;

WHEREAS, the City of Marina City Council approved an allocation of $1,435,000 for City Capital Improvement Project QLP2112 for the purchase and installation of playground equipment, playground surfacing, and construction of new restroom facilities at Windy Hill Park, and;

WHEREAS, at the Regular City Council Meeting of August 7, 2024 City Council adopted Resolution 2024-92 approving an agreement with KOMPAN California, Inc. for the purchase and installation of Playground Equipment and Surface Materials for Windy Hill Park, and;

WHEREAS, at the Regular City Council Meeting of April 15, 2025 City Council adopted Resolution 2025 -25 approving a professional services agreement with Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc. of Fresno, CA for engineering and land surveying services, for a not to exceed amount of $49,000 for the design of the Windy Hill Park restroom facilities, and;

WHEREAS, the playground equipment installation and playground surfacing has been completed and the grand opening of the new playground area occurred on June 7, 2025, and;

WHEREAS, at the Regular City Council Meeting of August 6, 2025 City Council adopted Resolution 2025 -89 approving the purchase of the Windy Hill Park Prefabricated Restroom Facility from the Public Restroom Company of Winden NV for $298,453.00, and;

WHEREAS, the City has determined the project exempt from environmental review per § 15303(e) of the CEQA Guidelines, and;

WHEREAS, the improvement plans, which include the building foundation and pad, minor sidewalk renovations, one designated ADA parking space, and utility improvements for restroom fixtures are now complete and ready for advertisement.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby approve advertising and call for bids for the construction of the Windy Hill Park Restroom Improvements Project.

3 Resolution No. 2026-

Page 2 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, duly held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

____________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TMAP MOBILITY Earthstar Geographics SIO 1 Ref. & Rev.PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

Ch. By:

Date:

Scale: As Noted
YH Job No.

Sheet No.
of Sheets
Plot By: Aaron Martinez Plot Date: 5/6/2026 File Location: F:\2025\25-174\dwg\Improvements\City Plans\25-174_Cover Sheet.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM

SN
AM
05/06/2026
25-174
C1
17 CITY OF MARINA
WINDY HILL PARK IMPROVEMENTS - 3240 DE FOREST ROAD

COVER SHEET

CITY OF MARINA

PLANS FOR
WINDY HILL PARK IMPROVEMENTS - 3240 DE

FOREST ROAD
3240 DE FOREST ROAD
SHEET INDEX:

VICINITY MAP:

PROJECT

LOCATION

DE FOREST RD

DEL MONTE BLVD

BEACH RD

RESERVATION RD

CABRILLO HWY
LEGEND:

R
Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT GRADING NOTES:

SITE INFORMATION:

LOCATION MAP
NOTE:

BENCHMARK:

APPLICANT INFORMATION:

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NOTES:

DE FOREST ROAD
APPROVED BY:

BEACH ROAD
5 May 14, 2026 Item No: 10f(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 2, 2026

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 26-,
APPROVING A REQUEST BY MARINA STATION PHASES 1 AND 2

LLC, TO RELEASE A PORTION OF THE PERFORMANCE SECURITY

FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE MARINA STATION PHASES
1 AND 2 AREA IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,349,900, ACCEPTING A
SUBSTITUTE PERFORMANCE BOND SECURITY OF $1,261,100 FOR

REMAINING PUNCH LIST ITEMS , AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE RELEASE AGREEMENT S ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND

APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 2026-:

1. Approving a request by Marina Station Phases 1 and 2, LLC. , to release a portion of the performance security for public improvements in the Marina Station Phases 1 and 2 area in the amount of $11,349,900,

2. Accepting a substitute performance bond security of $1,261,100 for the remaining punch list items, and;

3. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the release agreement s on behalf of the City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND:

At the regular meeting of May 20, 2025 , the City Council adopted Resolution s No. 2025-42, approving the Public Improvement Agreement between City of Marina (City) and Marina Station Phase 1 and 2, LLC, (Developer), to construct public improvements in the Marina Station Phase 1 and 2 area. The Contracting Parties, as required by the Public Improvement Agreement, filed with the City Clerk performance bonds in the combined amount of $12,611,000 to guarantee completion of public improvements within Phases 1 and 2 as described in the Agreements (“EXHIBIT A”).

ANALYSIS:

On May 14, 2026 , City staff received a written request from the Developer to reduce the performance bond by 90% and accept a substitute performance bond of 10% of the original bond amount for remaining punch list items (“EXHIBIT B”). The Agreement with the Developer does not require acceptance prior to 100% completion . Government Code §66499.7 permits the Developer to seek a partial release of its p erformance bond following verified satisfactory completion of at least 80% of the work. A partial release of performance security does not operate as an acceptance of the completed improvements and the risk of loss and responsibility for maintenance remains with the Developer until acceptance.

1 The Public Improvement Agreement with the Developer provide for security in the form of a performance bond in the total amount of the contract price (for t his agreement, the total price is $1,261,100). There is a one-year warranty period following acceptance for which the performance bond may serve as security or, alternatively, the developer may substitute a warranty bond in the amount of 10% of the total contract price.

Staff has confirmed that a substantial portion representing 90% of the public improvements has been completed in accordance with documentation submitted by the Developer and in conformance with the approved Improvement Plans (see “EXHIBIT C”). The remaining punch list items include site striping and signage, and staff is assured that these improvements will be completed for final acceptance of all improvements.

The Developer shall provide substitute security in the amount of $1,261,100 in place of the original $12,611,000 in performance security. The Developer shall provide an updated Title Report that shows that the bonds to be released are unencumbered by mechanical lien claims prior to the City issuing its bond reduction letter to the Developer’s Bonding Company.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact as City inspections have shown approximately $11,349,900 in improvements have been completed per approved plans and any failure to complete the public improvements is covered by the substitute security in the amount of $1,261,100.

CEQA Findings:

The City has determined this is not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Edrie Delos Santos, P.E.

Engineering Division
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

__________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA
APPROVING A REQUEST BY MARINA STATION PHASES 1 AND 2 LLC,

TO RELEASE A PORTION OF THE PERFORMANCE SECURITY FOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE MARINA STATION PHASES 1 AND 2 AREA IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,349,900, ACCEPTING A SUBSTITUTE PERFORMANCE BOND SECURITY OF $1,261,100 FOR REMAINING

PUNCH LIST ITEMS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE THE RELEASE AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY

SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY

ATTORNEY

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of May 20, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolutions No. 2025-42, approving the Public Improvement Agreement between City of Marina (City) and Marina Station Phase 1 and 2, LLC, (Developer), to construct public improvements in the Marina Station Phase 1 and 2 area. The Contracting Parties, as required by the Public Improvement Agreement, filed with the City Clerk performance bonds in the combined amount of $12,611,000 to guarantee completion of public improvements within Pha ses 1 and 2 as described in the Agreements (“EXHIBIT A”), and;

WHEREAS, on May 14, 2026, City staff received a written request from the Developer to reduce the performance bond by 90% and accept a substitute performance bond of 10% of the original bond amount for remaining punch list items (“EXHIBIT B”). The Agreement with the Developer does not require acceptance prior to 100% completion. Government Code §66499.7 permits the Developer to seek a partial release of its performance bond following verified satisfactory completion of at least 80% of the work. A partial release of performance security does not operate as an acceptance of the completed improvements and the risk of loss and responsibility for maintenance remains with the Developer until acceptance, and;

WHEREAS, the Public Improvement Agreements with the Developer provide for security in the form of a performance bond in the total amount of the contract price (for this agreement, the total price is $1,261,100). There is a one -year warranty period following acceptance for which the performance bond may serve as security or, alternatively, the developer may substitute a warranty bond in the amount of 10% of the total contract price, and;

WHEREAS, staff has confirmed that a substantial portion representing 90% of the public improvements has been completed in accordance with documentation submitted by the Developer and in conformance with the approved Improvement Plans (see “EXHIBIT C”). The remaining punch list items include site striping and signage, and staff is assured that these improvements will be completed for final acceptance of all improvements, and;

WHEREAS, the Developer shall provide substitute security in the amount of $1,261,100 in place of the original $1,261,100 in performance security. The Developer shall provide an updated Title Report that shows that the bonds to be released are unencumbered by mechanical lien claims prior to the City issuing its bond reduction letter to the Developer’s Bonding Company, and;

WHEREAS, there is no fiscal impact as City inspections have shown approximately $1,261,100 in improvements has been completed per approved plans and any failure to complete the public improvements is covered by the substitute security in the amount of $1,261,100, and;

3 Resolution 2026-

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, the City has determined this is not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Approve a request by Marina Station Phases 1 and 2, LLC. , to release a portion of the performance security for public improvements in the Marina Station Phases 1 and 2 area in the amount of $11,349,900,

2. Accept a substitute performance bond security of $ 1,261,100 for the remaining punch list items, and;

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the release agreements on behalf of the City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

_____________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 EXHIBIT A
5 EXHIBIT A
6 EXHIBIT A
7 EXHIBIT A
8 EXHIBIT A
9 EXHIBIT A
10 EXHIBIT A
11 EXHIBIT A
12 EXHIBIT A
13 EXHIBIT A
14 EXHIBIT A
15 EXHIBIT A
16 EXHIBIT A
17 EXHIBIT A
18 EXHIBIT A
19 EXHIBIT A
20 EXHIBIT A
21 t:\monterey projects\4105 - marina station\docs\cooresp\letters\4105-city_p1-2 complete_02.docx Jon Ingraham May 14, 2026

THIRD MILLENNIUM PARTNERS
Re:

Marina Station Phase 1-2
Project Completeness Summary
Pe
r your request, a site visit was performed at Marina Station Phase 1-2 to evaluate the status of subdivision improvements in relation to the Delta 3 revision to the Phase 1-2 Improvement Plans by Whitson Engineers, dated 9/4/2024. We found that the Phase 1-2 subdivision improvements to be substantially complete with the following items remaining:
• Comp
letion of minor Signing and Striping items is in progress • Completion of sidewalks at lot frontages is on-going with home construction • Bioretention Basin fine-grading and soil mix is in progress • Minor punch list items expected to be identified by City The
current Phase 1-2 performance bond amount is $12,611,000 and we concur that a 90% performance bond reduction would provide ample remaining security to complete the phase ($1,261,100)
Si
ncerely,
Whitson Engineers
Andr
ew Hunter PE | Principal
RCE 67730

EXHIBIT B TO

STAFF REPORT
22 EXHIBIT C TO

STAFF REPORT
23 May 27, 2026 Item No. 10f(2)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 2, 2026

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2026 -, DENYING

THE REQUEST BY KRIS CAMERON ON BEHALF OF FOGTOWN FAMILY CAR

CLUB TO USE THE CITY OF MARINA LOGO AND DIRECTING STAFF TO

EXPLORE POTENTIAL FUTURE PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES WITH THE

APPLICANT

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, denying the request submitted by Kris Cameron on behalf of the Fogtown Family Car Club to use the City of Marina logo (current shield and/or prior 1975 badge) on club apparel, signage, promotional materials, and as a component of a privately - registered trademark; and

2. Direct staff to notify the applicant of the Council’s action and to explore other opportunities through which a limited, event-specific logo use could be considered consistent with the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program.

BACKGROUND:

In or around September 2025, the City received a Permit Application for the Use of the City of Marina Logo from Mr. Kris Cameron, founder of the Fogtown Family Car Club. See EXHIBIT A. The applicant proposes to incorporate the City’s prior 1975 -era logo (“Old City Logo”) into the Club’s own logo, which the applicant intends to register as a federal trademark, and to apply the combined mark to Club apparel, vehicle decals, banners, signag e, and event materials. In the application narrative, the applicant identifies the following intended benefits to the City: (i) advertisement of Marina through Club travel to neighboring cities, counties, and other states; (ii) attraction of tourism and potential new residents; and (iii) plans to support the community through fundraising for local charities, volunteer work, and support of local businesses and community members. The Club’s proposed combined logo and a copy of the application are attached as Exhibit A. On March 23, 2026, the applicant sent a follow-up email to City Attorney requesting an update on the status of the request and indicating willingness to enter into a legal agreement on terms set by the Council. See EXHIBIT B. In that email, the applicant expressly confirmed his intent to register the combined mark as a trademark, stating: “At the moment I am unable to trademark the club logo until I have the written permission to use the old city badge.”

The use of the City of Marina logo and seal is governed by the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines, adopted by the City Council on October 7, 2008, by Resolution No. 2008-205.

The Guidelines provide that “use, reproduction, or storage of artwork or materials specified in this manual is prohibited without the express written consent of the City of Marina.” The current City logo and Official City Seal are protected works registered with the United States Copyright Office (Reg. Nos. VA 1-692-471 and VA 1-692-474, effective November 17, 2009), with the City of Marina named as copyright claimant. The City’s prior 1975-era logo, although not separately registered with the Copyright Office, remains City property and has been treated by the City Council, since at least 1997, as subject to the same Permit Application process as the current logo.

The City has also maintained a standing Permit Application process, under which organizations, or individuals seeking to use the City logo must complete a written application and obtain Council approval prior to use.

ANALYSIS:

Consistency with Past Council Approvals.

Since the Permit Application process was established, the Council has granted logo-use authorization on a limited basis to organizations whose activities provide a clear and demonstrated benefit to the City of Marina or its residents. A review of prior approvals reflects a consistent pattern:

Applicant Purpose of Use Resolution
Marina Rotary Club Community service events benefiting Marina residents
2003-132
Royer Printing / Piper Jaffray Marina General Obligation Bond Official Statement
2005-205
Monterey Peninsula College Promotional postcard for MPC courses offered in Marina
2006-143
MP Chamber of Commerce 2006 Leadership Luncheon program cover 2006-180 U.S. Army Garrison Command,
Presidio of Monterey
Army Community Covenant Ceremony
invitation
2008-84

The standard codified most clearly in Resolution No. 2003 -132 (Marina Rotary Club) requires findings that the applicant:

a. Is “an integral part of the community through its many activities and events benefiting the City of Marina”;
b. Does not participate in political advertising; and
c. Is using the logo for the purpose of “promoting...activities and events, public awareness and civic pride for the betterment of the people of the City of Marina.”

That standard, applied consistently across the approvals reflected above, has the practical effect of limiting third-party use of the City logo to organizations that provide a clear and documented public benefit to the City.

The Fogtown Family Car Club’s application does not satisfy this standard. The application describes the Club as a private car club and identifies the intended benefits to the City as (i) advertisement of Marina through Club travel to neighboring cities, counties, and other states; (ii) attraction of tourism and potential new residents; and (iii) general plans to support the community through fundraising for local charities, volunteer work, and support of local businesses and community members. Staff recognizes the applicant’s expressed civic interest. However, these stated benefits do not meet the standard codified in Resolution No. 2003-132 for several reasons.

First, the standard requires that the applicant already be “an integral part of the community through its many activities and events benefiting the City of Marina.” The Council has applied that language to require documented, ongoing community service. The Marina Rotary Club approval, for example, was supported by specific, established events , the Annual Marina Air Faire, the Senior Holiday Dinner, the Senior Seminar, the Halloween Safe & Fun Night, and Teen Center building and grounds improvements. The Fogtown application, by contrast, describes prospective and general plans rather than established activities, and identifies no specific charity, event, partnership, business, or community member that the Club has supported or has committed to support.

Second, the applicant’s primary stated benefit, advertisement of Marina through Club travel to other jurisdictions, is incidental to the Club’s own activities and does not itself constitute a service to the City or its residents. The Council’s past approvals have been granted where the proposed use is directly tied to a service provided to the Marina community (Rotary), an educational program serving Marina residents (Monterey Peninsula College), official City business (Royer Printing / Piper Jaffray), or a governmental partner with a direct relationship to the City (Army Garrison Command).

The proposed Fogtown use is not tied to a City -sponsored event, a Marina -area community service program, a City-recognized fundraiser, or any official City function.

Third, the volunteer and fundraising activities described in the application, while commendable in concept, can be undertaken by the Club without use of the City logo. Use of the City logo is not necessary to support local charities, businesses, or community members, and the application does not explain how the proposed logo use is required to accomplish the community benefits the applicant describes.

On this basis alone, staff is unable to recommend approval. Granting the request would represent a substantial departure from the standard the Council has applied to similarly situated requests.

Intellectual Property Considerations
In addition to the primary basis for denial set forth above, the applicant’s stated intent to register the resulting design as a federal trademark raises a separate and independent concern. The applicant has expressly indicated that, once granted permissio n to use the City badge, he intends to seek federal trademark registration of the Club’s logo, which incorporates the City badge as a central element. The applicant reiterated this intent in his March 23, 2026 follow -up email, in which he stated: “At the moment I am unable to trademark the club logo until I have the written permission to use the old city badge.” The applicant’s communications make clear that he is seeking the City’s written permission specifically to enable private trademark registration of a mark that incorporates City iconography.

Permitting the incorporation of City -owned imagery into a privately -registered trademark would be materially distinguishable from the time-limited, purpose-specific promotional uses the Council has approved in the past. None of the prior approvals reflecte d in the table above involved private trademark registration of any portion of the City logo. Such a registration could:

a. Confer enforceable trademark rights in a private party over a mark that incorporates City iconography;
b. Create potential conflicts with the City’s future use, licensing, or enforcement of its own marks; and
c. Establish a precedent inconsistent with the express limitations of the 2008 Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines, which require express City consent for all reproduction and use.

This concern provides an independent basis for the staff recommendation, and would warrant denial even if the applicant satisfied the community-benefit standard described above.

Status of the Prior (“1975”) Logo
The applicant’s design relies on the City’s pre -2008 logo rather than the current shield. Although it appears the prior logo was not separately registered with the United States Copyright Office, it was adopted and used by the City to identify the City of Marina and has been treated by the City Council, through its consistent practice since at least 1997, as City property subject to the same Permit Application process applicable to the current logo. Resolution No. 2003 -132 (Marina Rotary Club) and other subsequent approvals were each issued for use of the prior 1975 -era logo, confirming that the Council has consistently exercised approval authority over that mark. The 2008 Program superseded the Old Cit Logo for official use but did not place such logo into the public domain.

Accordingly, the Old City Logo is subject to the same Council -approval requirement as the current logo.

Potential Opportunities.

While staff cannot recommend the request as currently framed, staff recognizes the applicant’s expressed interest in the Marina community and his willingness to work with the City on terms acceptable to the Council. Staff recommends that, concurrent with the denial, the Council direct staff to explore other opportunities through which a limited, event -specific logo use could be considered consistent with the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None. Denial of the request and communication with the applicant can be accomplished within existing staff resources.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The proposed action is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), which excludes “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.”

CONCLUSION:

This item is submitted for Council consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________
Anita Sharp
Deputy City Clerk
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

EXHIBIT:

Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B – March 23, 2026, email to City Attorney

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DENYING THE

REQUEST OF KRIS CAMERON ON BEHALF OF THE FOGTOWN FAMILY CAR CLUB TO USE

THE CITY OF MARINA LOGO AND DIRECTING STAFF TO EXPLORE POTENTIAL FUTURE

PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

WHEREAS, the City of Marina has adopted, by Resolution No. 2008-205, the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines, which provide that use, reproduction, or storage of artwork or materials specified therein is prohibited without the express written consent of the City of Marina; and

WHEREAS, the City’s current logo and Official City Seal are registered with the United States Copyright Office (Registration Nos. VA 1-692-471 and VA 1-692-474, effective November 17, 2009), with the City of Marina named as copyright claimant; and

WHEREAS, the prior 1975 -era City logo, although not separately registered with the United States Copyright Office, remains the property of the City of Marina and has been treated by the City Council, through its consistent practice, as subject to the same Permit Application process applicable to the current logo, including in the approvals granted by Resolution Nos. 2003 -132, 2005-205, 2006-143, 2006-180, and 2008-84; and

WHEREAS, the City has maintained a standing Permit Application process pursuant to which organizations or individuals seeking to use the City of Marina logo must complete a written application and obtain City Council approval prior to use; and

WHEREAS, on or about September 2025, Mr. Kris Cameron, on behalf of the Fogtown Family Car Club, submitted a Permit Application requesting permission to incorporate the City’s prior 1975 -era logo into the Club’s own logo, to apply the resulting mark to Clu b apparel, vehicle decals, banners, signage, and event materials, and to register the resulting mark as a federal trademark; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has previously authorized third -party use of the City of Marina logo only on a limited basis to organizations whose activities provide demonstrated benefit to the City of Marina or its residents, including the Marina Rotary Club (Resolution No. 2003-132), Royer Printing/Piper Jaffray (Resolution No. 2005 -205), Monterey Peninsula College (Resolution No. 2006 -143), the Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce (Resolution No. 2006 -180), and the U.S. Army Garrison Command, Presidio of Monterey (Resolution No. 2008-84); and

WHEREAS, the standard established by Resolution No. 2003 -132 requires findings that the applicant is an integral part of the community through its many activities and events benefiting the City of Marina, does not participate in political advertising, and is using the logo for the purpose of promoting public awareness and civic pride for the betterment of the people of the City of Marina; and

WHEREAS, the Fogtown Family Car Club, while it may have community ties, describes prospective benefits to the City — including advertisement of Marina through Club travel, attraction of tourism and new residents, and general plans for fundraising, voluntee r work, and support of local businesses and community members — but does not identify documented activities, events, partnerships, charities, or City-sponsored functions establishing that the Club is presently “an integral part of the community through its many activities and events benefiting the City of Marina” as required by the standard codified in Resolution No. 2003-132, and the proposed use is not tied to a City-sponsored event, community service program, or official City function, and the proposed u se therefore does not satisfy the standard the City Council has consistently applied to prior requests; and

Resolution No. 2026-
Page Two

WHEREAS, the applicant’s stated intent to incorporate City -owned imagery into a privately registered federal trademark is materially distinguishable from the time -limited, purpose-specific promotional uses previously approved by the City Council would represent a substantial departure from prior practice, and would risk impairing the City’s ability to use, license, and enforce its own marks; and

WHEREAS, the City Council nonetheless wishes to recognize the applicant’s stated interest in the Marina community and to leave open the possibility of a future, narrower request consistent with the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program.

WHEREAS, the proposed action is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), which excludes “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in d irect or indirect physical changes in the environment.”

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Find that the request submitted by Kris Cameron on behalf of the Fogtown Family Car Club does not satisfy the standard for third -party use of the City logo established by Resolution No. 2003 -132 and consistently applied by the City Council in subsequent approvals, in that the benefits identified in the application — advertisement of Marina through Club travel, attraction of tourism and potential new residents, and general plans to support local charities, businesses, and community members — describe prospective and general intentions rather than documented activities, events, partnerships, or charities through which the Fogtown Family Car Club has established itself as an integral part of the Marina community, the applicant’s primary stated benefit (advertisement through Club travel outside Marina) does not itself constitute service to the City or its residents, and the proposed use is not tied to a City-sponsored event, community service program, or official City function;

2. Find, as a separate and independent basis, that authorization of the proposed incorporation of City - owned imagery into a privately registered federal trademark would be inconsistent with prior City Council practice and with the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program adopted by Resolution No. 2008-205;

3. Deny the request of Kris Cameron on behalf of the Fogtown Family Car Club to use the City of Marina logo (current shield and prior 1975 badge) on Club apparel, vehicle decals, banners, signage, and event materials, and to incorporate the City logo into a privately registered federal trademark;

4. Direct staff to communicate this decision in writing to the applicant and to explore other opportunities through which a limited, event -specific logo use could be considered consistent with the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, duly held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
__________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Antia Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

May 21, 2026 Item No. 10f(3)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 2, 2026

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 202 6-,

ACCEPTING THE REHABILITATION OF THE MARINA ARTS VILLAGE AND THE ARTS DISTRICT STABILIZATION PROJECT.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 2026-,:

1. Accepting the rehabilitation of the Marina Arts Village and the completion of the Arts District Stabilization Project; and

2. Authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion with the Monterey County Recorder’s Office.

BACKGROUND:

On April 1, 2025 the City Council adopted Resolution 2025-20 approving a Public Improvement and Reimbursement agreement with Shea Homes, the developer of The Dunes, to stabilize and rehabilitate the Marina Arts Village Building, a vacant 60,000 sqft structure on the corner of 1 st Ave and 8th Street.

Within that agreement were several alternatives for consideration including demolition of the building, and a combination of different partial demolitions and stabilizations. A total of five (5) Alternatives were presented to City Council, who directed staff to pursue Alternative 1: Stabilize the Arts Village with the removal of the Building 3 section with the existing foundation still in place. Total estimated cost $2,706,000, with the Shea splitting the cost equally with the City with each party contributing $1,353,000 to the cost.

The Arts Village is a component of the University Village Specific Plan and is designated as a proposed Arts District.

The Council’s previous discussions have ranged from demolishing the entire structure to stabilizing parts of or stabilizing the whole structure.

ANALYSIS
The Final costs of the rehabilitation of the Marina Arts Village building was below the approved $2,700,000 with The City of Marina contributing $1,290,392.99 through reimbursement to Shea Homes. There were no contract change orders and final building inspections occurred on February 04, 2026.

The project was completed within the allotted budget and in less than one year from Council approval of the Public Improvement and Reimbursement Agreement with Shea Homes.

The Project is now complete. It is appropriate to accept these public improvements and to file a Notice of Completion for the project with the Monterey County Recorder’s Office (Exhibit A).

Following Council approval.
1 FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The proposed action is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), which excludes “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.”

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

Exhibits:

Exhibit A – Notice of Completion
2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA ACCEPTING

THE REHABILITATION OF THE MARINA ARTS VILLAGE AND THE ARTS

DISTRICT STABILIZATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, a component of the University Villages Specific Plan includes an area designated as a proposed Arts District envisioned as a combination of individual studio spaces, galleries, or shops for artists, retail sales, food shops, and co-worker spaces; and WHEREAS, this property was transferred back to the City in December 2019 and the primary component is a 60,000 square foot warehouse structure that is decaying over time; and WHEREAS, this warehouse structure has value to the community to develop in the future as an Arts Village or Marina Arts and Innovation Center; and
WHEREAS, at the Regular City Council Meeting on April 1, 2025 City Council adopted Resolution 2025-20 approving a Public Improvement and Reimbursement Agreement with Shea Homes for the Rehabilitation of the Marina Arts Village and t he total cost was estimated to be $2,700,000 and the City has previously approved Capital Project No. EDF 2008 and allocated $1,350,000 for the rehabilitation of the Arts Village warehouse.

WHEREAS, the total reimbursement amount from the City to Shea Homes is $1,290, 392.99 and no contract change orders were necessary.

WHEREAS, the project was completed with final inspections on February 04, 2026. It is appropriate to accept these public improvements and to file a Notice of Completion for the project with the Monterey County Recorder’s Office (“Exhibit A”).

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Accept the rehabilitation of the Marina Arts Village and the completion of the Arts District Stabilization Project.

2. Authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the Monterey County Recorder’s Office.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

___________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
3 After Recordation Return To:

City of Marina
Community Development Department
211 Hillcrest Ave
Marina, CA 93933

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Marina, a municipal corporation, did, on the 5th Day of May, 2025, enter into a public improvement and reimbursement agreement with Shea Homes Limited Partnership, 4309 Hacienda Drive, Suite 180, Pleasanton, CA 94588, a subsidiary of Shea Homes Northern California wherein said contractor agreed to complete all work for the Arts and Innovation District Rehabilitation and Stabilization Project to stabilize and secure the Marina Arts Village structure in a manner to keep the original architectural integrity as detailed in the Marina City Council Resolution 2025- 20 and Staff Report approved at the regular City Council meeting on April 1, 2025.

That the work under said public improvement and reimbursement agreement was actually completed by the contractor or assignee and accepted by the City of Marina on February 4, 2026.

The real property involved in said contract is described as a warehouse structure located at 2082, 2083, and 2084 1st Ave with the property interest of the City is Owner.

Dated: June,_____, 2026
MARINA, a Municipal Corporation
BY ________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director

VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, say: I am the Public Works Director/City Engineer of the City of Marina, a Municipal Corporation, and the declarant of the foregoing notice of completion: I have read said notice of completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on __________________________, 2026, in Marina, California.

BY__________________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director

EXHIBIT A
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 May 24, 2026 Item No. 10g(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 2, 2026

CITY COUNCIL TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026 -, APPROVING AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A REGULATORY

AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR

THE MARINA KAI PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ,

SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY , AND

FINDING SUCH APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE SUCH AGREEMENT IS NOT A PROJECT UNDER CEQA.

REQUEST
It is requested that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-_:

1. Approving the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants between the City of Marina and Interim, Inc. for the Marina Kai development; and

2. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City , subject to review and approval by the City Attorney, and direct the City Clerk to cause the Agreement to be recorded in the Official Records of the County of Monterey; and

3. Find that the proposed action is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA ) as a pproval and execution of the Regulatory Agreement is an administrative action to implement conditions on an already -approved development and does not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

BACKGROUND
Interim, Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, owns property located in the City of Marina (APN 031 -081-005-000). On June 13, 2024, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2024-12 approving Design Review and Sign Permits for the devel opment of twenty- three (23) permanent supportive housing units plus one (1) manager unit on the property, known as the Marina Kai project.

Pursuant to Marina Municipal Code Section 17.48.030 (Inclusionary Ordinance), twenty percent of the units in the development must be affordable in perpetuity. Additionally, the affordable unit mix exceeds the threshold required to qualify for a density bonus, concessions, and waivers under Government Code Section 65915 (Density Bonus Law).

ANALYSIS
The proposed Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants (Exhibit A ) establishes the affordability and occupancy requirements for five (5) affordable units within the Marina Kai development. The key terms of the Agreement are as follows:

Affordable Unit Requirements. The Agreement restricts five units as affordable in perpetuity: one (1) Very Low Income unit, two (2) Low Income units, and two (2) Moderate Income units. Income levels are based on HCD income limits for Monterey County, adjusted for household size. 1 Rent Limits. Rents for the affordable units are capped at 30% of the applicable income level: 50% of area median income for the Very Low Income unit, 60% for Low Income units, and 110% for Moderate Income units. All initial rents and subsequent increases require City approval.

Term. The Agreement runs with the land in perpetuity and binds all successors in title to the property.

Monitoring and Compliance. The Owner must obtain and maintain income certifications for all affordable unit tenants, submit annual reports to the City, and permit on -site inspections. The Owner is responsible for paying the City’s monitoring and enforcement fees in accordance with the Master Fee Schedule.

Property Management. The Owner must retain a professional property management company approved by the City and maintain a resident manager at all times. The City retains the right to require replacement of the management agent if the development is not operated in accordance with the Agreement.

Nondiscrimination and Tenant Selection. The Agreement requires compliance with all applicable fair housing laws and the City’s BMR Program Administrative Policies and Procedures. Units may be targeted for occupancy by persons who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, or fleeing domestic or sexual violence, consistent with development lender requirements.

The Agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT
No significant fiscal impact is anticipated. The Owner will pay the City’s monitoring and enforcement fees for the affordable units in accordance with the Master Fee Schedule. The City will not incur costs for the construction, operation, or management of the development.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed action is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Approval and execution of the Regulatory Agreement is an administrative action to implement conditions on an already -approved development and does not result i n a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

CONCLUSION
This request is submitted for City Council consideration.

______________________________
Guido Persicone
Community Development Director
Reviewed/Concur

______________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA APPROVING

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A REGULATORY

AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR THE

MARINA KAI PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, SUBJECT

TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY , AND FIND SUCH

APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE SUCH AGREEMENT IS NOT A

PROJECT UNDER CEQA

WHEREAS, Interim, Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (“Owner”), owns property located in the City of Marina, more particularly described as APN 031-081-005-000 (the “Property”); and

WHEREAS, on June 13, 2024, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2024-12 approving Design Review and Sign Permits for the development of twenty -three (23) permanent supportive housing units plus one (1) manager unit on the Property, known as the Marina Kai p roject (the “Development”); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Marina Municipal Code Section 17.48.030 (Inclusionary Ordinance), twenty percent (20%) of the units in the Development must be affordable in perpetuity, requiring one (1) Very Low Income unit, two (2) Low Income units, and two (2) Moderate In come units; and

WHEREAS, the affordable unit mix exceeds the threshold required to qualify for a density bonus, concessions, and waivers under Government Code Section 65915 (Density Bonus Law); and

WHEREAS, the proposed Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants (the “Agreement”) establishes the affordability and occupancy requirements for the five (5) affordable units within the Development, including income certification, rent limits, m onitoring, property management standards, nondiscrimination provisions, and compliance with the City’s BMR Program Administrative Policies and Procedures; and

WHEREAS, the Agreement restricts rents for the affordable units at 30% of the applicable income level: 50% of area median income for the Very Low Income unit, 60% for the Low Income units, and 110% for the Moderate Income units, with all initial rents and increas es subject to City approval; and

WHEREAS, the Agreement runs with the land in perpetuity and binds all successors in title to the Property; and

WHEREAS, approval and execution of the Agreement is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is an administrative action to implement conditions on an already-approved development and does not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina hereby resolves as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference; 3 Resolution No. 2026-
Page Two

2. The City Council hereby approves the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants between the City of Marina and Interim, Inc. for the Marina Kai permanent supportive housing development, in substantially the form presented to the City Council;

3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City, subject to review and approval as to form by the City Attorney; and

4. Approval and execution of the Agreement is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is an administrative action to implement conditions on an already -approved development and does not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; and

5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause the Agreement to be recorded in the Official Records of the County of Monterey following execution by all parties.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 1

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Marina
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California 93933
Attention: City Manager
No fee for recording pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383
______________________________________________________________________________

REGULATORY AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE

COVENANTS

MARINA KAI
This Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this ____ day of _______, 2026 by and between the City of Marina, a municipal corporation (the “City”), and Interim, Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the “Owner”).

RECITALS
A. Owner owns that certain property located in the City of Marina on the former Fort Ord Base more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto.

B. The City has issued a Design Review and Sign Permits for the development of twenty- three (23) permanent supportive housing units, plus one (1) manager unit as further described in Resolution 2024-12 adopted by the Planning Commission on June 13, 2024.

The development is referred to as "Building 2" on the site plan provided in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference.

C. Pursuant to Marina Municipal Code Section 17.48.030 (“Inclusionary Ordinance”), twenty percent (20%) of the Units in the Development must be affordable in perpetuity.

Six percent of the units must be reserved for Very Low Income Households, seven percent of the units must be reserved for Low Income Households, and seven percent of the units must be reserved for Moderate Income Households. Together, the Very Low Income Units and Low Income Units exceed the threshold requirement that the Development provide ten percent Low Income Units to qualify for a density bonus, concessions, and waivers under Government Code Section 65915 (“Density Bonus Law”).

D. The five Affordable Units will be subject to this Agreement in perpetuity.

EXHIBIT A
5 2
E. The following covenants and restrictions are recorded against the Property to ensure compliance with Government Code Section 65915 and Marina Municipal Code Chapter

17.48. THEREFORE, the City and the Owner hereby agree as follows.

ARTICLE 1

DEFINITIONS

Section 1.1 Definitions. When used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in this Article 1. (a) “Actual Household Size” means the actual number of persons in the applicable household.
(b) "Adjusted Income" means the total anticipated annual income of all persons in a household, as calculated in accordance with 25 California Code of Regulations Section 6914 or pursuant to a successor State housing program that utilizes a reasonably similar method of calculation of adjusted income.
(c) “Affordable Units” means the one Very Low Income Unit, two Low Income Units, and two Moderate Income Units restricted according to the Inclusionary Ordinance and Density Bonus Law.
(d) “Agreement” means this Regulatory Agreement.
(e) “Assumed Household Size” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(e). The definition is utilized to calculate affordable rent and is not intended to be a limit on the number of persons occupying a unit.
(f) “City” means the City of Marina, a municipal corporation. (g) “Development” means the Property and the twenty-three (23) residential units plus one (1) manager unit to be developed on the Property, as well as all appurtenant landscaping, roads and parking spaces existing thereon, as the same may exist from time to time.

The Development is referred to as "Building 2" in Exhibit B attached hereto. (h) “Development Loan” means any loan or grant received by Owner for the construction and operation of the Development.
(i) “Development Lender” means any lender or grantor of a Development Loan.
(j) “Eligible Household” means a Very Low Income Household, Low Income Household, or Moderate Income Household.

EXHIBIT A
6 3
(k) “Federal Government” has the meaning given in Section 6.16 of this Agreement.
(l) “HCD” means the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
(m) “HHS” has the meaning given in Section 6.16 of this Agreement. (n) “HHS Deed” has the meaning given in Section 6.16 of this Agreement. (o) “Low Income” means the income that does not exceed the qualifying limits for low income households, adjusted for Actual Household Size, based on the California HCD income limits for Monterey County.
(p) “Low Income Household” means a household with an Adjusted Income that does not exceed the Low Income limits for Monterey County. (q) “Low Income Unit” means the Units which pursuant to Section 2.1(b) below are required to be occupied by Low Income Households or Very Low Income Households.
(r) “Median Income” means the median gross yearly income, adjusted for Actual Household Size, in the County of Monterey, California, as published from time to time by HCD. In the event that such income determinations are no longer published, or are not updated for a period of at least eighteen (18) months, the City shall provide the Owner with other income determinations which are reasonably similar with respect to methods of calculation to those previously published by HCD.
(s) “Moderate Income” means the income that does not exceed the qualifying limits for moderate income households, adjusted for Actual Household Size, based on the HCD income limits for Monterey County.
(t) “Moderate Income Household” means a household with an Adjusted Income that does not exceed the Moderate Income limits for Monterey County. (u) “Moderate Income Rent” means the maximum allowable rent for a Moderate-Income Unit pursuant to Section 2.2(a) below.
(v) “Moderate Income Unit” means the Units which pursuant to Section

2.1(b) below are required to be occupied by Moderate Income Households, Low Income Households, or Very Low Income Households.

EXHIBIT A
7 4
(w) “Owner” means Interim, Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, and its successors and assigns to the Development. (x) “Property” means the parcel of real property located in Marina, California, as more particularly described in Exhibit A.
(y) “Rent” means the total of monthly payments by the Tenant of an Affordable Unit for the following: (1) use and occupancy of the Affordable Unit and land and associated facilities, including parking; (2) any separately charged fees or service charges assessed by the Owner which are required of all Tenants, other than security deposits; (3) the cost of an adequate level of service for utilities paid by the Tenant, including garbage collection, sewer, water, electricity, gas and other heating, cooking and refrigeration fuel, but not internet, telephone service, cable television service or any other utility or service permitted to be excluded from the calculation of Rent pursuant to the terms of 25 California Code of Regulations Section 6918; and (4) any other interest, taxes, fees or charges for use of the land or associated facilities and assessed by a public or private entity other than the Owner, and paid by the Tenant. (z) “Tenant” means a household occupying an Affordable Unit. (aa) “Term” means the term of this Agreement, which shall commence on the date of this Agreement and shall continue in perpetuity. (bb) “Unit” means one of the twenty-four (24) residential units to be constructed on the Property.
(cc) “Very Low Income” means the income that does not exceed the qualifying limits for very low income households, adjusted for Actual Household Size, based on the HCD income limits for Monterey County.
(dd) “Very Low Income Household” means a household with an Adjusted Income that does not exceed the Very Low Income limits for Monterey County. (ee) “Very Low Income Unit” means the Units which pursuant to Section

2.1(b) below are required to be occupied by Very Low Income Households.

ARTICLE 2

AFFORDABILITY AND OCCUPANCY COVENANTS

Section 2.1 Occupancy Requirement.
(a) Very Low Income Affordable Units. During the Term, the Owner shall cause one (1) of the Affordable Units to be rented to and occupied by, or if vacant, available for occupancy by Tenants earning incomes at or below Very Low Income.

EXHIBIT A
8 5
(b) Low Income Affordable Units. During the Term, the Owner shall cause two (2) of the Affordable Units to be rented to and occupied by, or if vacant, available for occupancy by Tenants earning incomes at or below Low Income. (c) Moderate Income Affordable Units. During the Term, the Owner shall cause two (2) of the Affordable Units to be rented to and occupied by, or if vacant, available for occupancy by Tenants earning incomes at or below Moderate Income.

Section 2.2 Allowable Rent.
(a) Very Low Income Rent. Subject to Section 2.3 below, the Rent charged to Tenants of the Very Low-Income Units shall not exceed one-twelfth (1/12th) of thirty percent (30%) of fifty percent (50%) of Median Income, adjusted for Assumed Household Size. (b) Low Income Rent. Subject to Section 2.3 below, the Rent charged to Tenants of the Low-Income Units shall not exceed one-twelfth (1/12th) of thirty percent (30%) of sixty percent (60%) of Median Income, adjusted for Assumed Household Size. (c) Moderate Income Rent. Subject to Section 2.3 below, the Rent charged to Tenants of the Moderate-Income Units shall not exceed one-twelfth (1/12th) of thirty percent (30%) of one hundred ten percent (110%) of Median Income, adjusted for Assumed Household Size.
(d) Initial Rents and Rent Increases. Initial Rents for all Affordable Units shall be approved by the City prior to occupancy to confirm compliance with this Agreement, which approval shall be deemed given if not denied within thirty (30) days after the City has received written request for approval. All rent increases shall also be subject to City approval to confirm compliance with this Agreement, which approval shall be deemed given if not denied within thirty (30) days after the City has received written request for approval. The City shall provide the Owner with a schedule of maximum permissible rents for the Affordable Units annually.

Except for an increase described in Section 2.3(a), Rents may not be increased more often than once every twelve (12) months without the prior written approval of the City. Owner shall provide each Tenant with at least sixty (60) days written notice of any increase in Rent applicable to such Tenant. The provisions of this paragraph 2.2(d) shall be subject to applicable Development Lender requirements.
(e) Assumed Household Size. In calculating the allowable Rent for the Affordable Units, Assumed Household Size shall be determined pursuant to the terms of Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5(h), as set forth below:

Number of Bedrooms Assumed Household Size
Studio 1
One 2
Two 3
Three 4

EXHIBIT A
9 6
However, for those Affordable Income Units where Rent is determined pursuant to the CTCAC rent levels in accordance with Section (a) above, Assumed Household Size shall be determined in accordance with CTCAC regulations, as set forth below:

Number of Bedrooms Assumed Household Size
Studio 1
One 1.5
Two 3
Three 4.5

Section 2.3 Increased Income of Tenants.
(a) Increase of Household Income Below Limit for Moderate Income Household. Subject to applicable Development Lender requirements, if, upon recertification of the income of a Tenant of an Affordable Unit, the Owner determines that the income of the Tenant has increased to above the qualifying limit for such household’s unit (“Over Income Household”), the Tenant may continue to occupy the Affordable Unit and the Owner shall rent the next available Unit to a household as necessary to maintain the appropriate number of Affordable Units in each income category as required pursuant to Section 2.1 above. Rent increases for Over Income Households shall not result in a total Rent exceeding 30% of the Adjusted Income.
(b) Termination of Occupancy. Upon termination of occupancy of an Affordable Unit by a Tenant, such Affordable Unit shall be deemed to be continuously occupied by a household of the same income level as the income level of the vacating Tenant, until such Affordable Unit is reoccupied, at which time the income character of the Affordable Unit shall be redetermined. In any event, Owner shall maintain the occupancy requirements set forth in section 2.1 above.

Section 2.4 Income and Rent Calculations. In the event that HCD no longer publishes the income and rent information that this Agreement contemplates that HCD will publish, the City will provide the Owner with other income and rent determinations which are reasonably similar with respect to methods of calculations to those previously published by HCD.

Section 2.5 Tenant Selection. Owner shall comply with the City’s BMR Program Administrative Policies and Procedures as they currently exist or as they may be updated from time to time in the selection of Tenants, including complying with any preferences in such Guidelines, to the fullest extent that is not inconsistent with applicable Development Lender requirements.

Section 2.6 Nondiscrimination. Owner shall not discriminate or segregate in the development, construction, use, enjoyment, occupancy, conveyance, lease, sublease, or rental of any part of the Property on the basis of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, sexual preference or orientation, age, marital status, family status, source of income, physical or mental disability, veteran status, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) or AIDS-related conditions (ARC) acquired or perceived, or any other arbitrary basis. Owner shall otherwise comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws concerning discrimination in housing.

EXHIBIT A
10 7

ARTICLE 3

INCOME CERTIFICATION AND REPORTING

Section 3.1 Income Certification. The Owner will obtain, complete and maintain on file, immediately prior to initial occupancy and annually thereafter, income certifications from each Tenant renting any of the Affordable Units. The Owner shall make a good faith effort to verify that the income provided by an applicant or occupying household in an income certification is accurate by taking two or more of the following steps as a part of the verification process: (a) obtain a pay stub for the most recent pay period; (b) obtain an income tax return for the most recent tax year; (c) conduct a credit agency or similar search; (d) obtain an income verification form from the applicant’s current employer; (e) obtain an income verification form from the Social Security Administration and/or the California Department of Social Services if the applicant receives assistance from either of such agencies; (f) if the applicant is unemployed and has no such tax return, obtain another form of independent verification; or (g) obtain documentation acceptable to other Development Lenders. Copies of Tenant income certifications shall be available to the City upon request. Owner shall not conduct a credit agency search for annual income recertification.

Section 3.2 Annual Report to City. The Owner shall submit to the City (a) not later than the sixtieth (60th) day after the close of each calendar year, or such other date as may be requested by the City, a statistical report, including income and rent data for all Affordable Units and (b) within fifteen (15) days after receipt of a written request, any other information or completed forms requested by the City in order to comply with reporting requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 33418. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, the Owner may satisfy this requirement by providing reporting material to the City prepared for a public agency Development Lender. City may request additional information consistent with this section that is not included in reporting material prepared for a public agency Development Lender.

Section 3.3 Additional Information. The Owner shall provide any additional information reasonably requested by the City. The City shall have the right to examine and make copies of all books, records or other documents of the Owner which pertain to the Development.

Section 3.4 Records. The Owner shall maintain complete, accurate and current records pertaining to the Development, and shall permit any duly authorized representative of the City to inspect records, including records pertaining to income and household size of Tenants upon reasonable prior notice during normal business hours. All Tenant lists, applications and waiting lists relating to the Development shall at all times be kept separate and identifiable from any other business of the Owner and shall be maintained as required by the City, in a reasonable condition for proper audit and subject to examination during business hours by representatives of the City. The Owner shall retain copies of all materials obtained or produced with respect to occupancy of the Affordable Units for a period of at least five (5) years.

Section 3.5 Expenses. Owner shall annually pay City’s monitoring and enforcement fees for the Affordable Units in accordance with City’s Master Fee Schedule, but only in the event that no other monitoring fee is charged in connection with funding administered by or on behalf of a public agency of the State of California. The monitoring or enforcement fee shall be either

EXHIBIT A
11 8
City’s actual expenses incurred for monitoring or enforcing the terms of this Agreement, including staff time and third party costs or the amount set forth in the Master Fee Schedule, as determined by City.

Section 3.6 On-site Inspection. The City shall have the right to perform an on-site inspection of the Development at least one (1) time per year. The Owner agrees to cooperate in such inspection. If City desires to inspect the interior of the residential units, City shall give Owner sufficient written notice to allow Owner to give seventy-two (72) hours’ notice to residents.

ARTICLE 4

OPERATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT

Section 4.1 Residential Use. The Development shall be operated only for residential use. No part of the Development shall be operated as transient housing.

Section 4.2 Taxes and Assessments. Owner shall pay all real and personal property taxes, assessments and charges and all franchise, income, employment, old age benefit, withholding, sales, and other taxes assessed against it, or payable by it, at such times and in such manner as to prevent any penalty from accruing, or any lien or charge from attaching to the Property; provided, however, that Owner shall have the right to contest in good faith, any such taxes, assessments, or charges. In the event Owner exercises its right to contest any tax, assessment, or charge against it, Owner, on final determination of the proceeding or contest, shall immediately pay or discharge any decision or judgment rendered against it, together with all costs, charges and interest.

ARTICLE 5

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE

Section 5.1 Management Responsibilities. The Owner is responsible for all management functions with respect to the Development, including without limitation the selection of tenants, certification and recertification of household size and income, evictions, collection of rents and deposits, maintenance, landscaping, routine and extraordinary repairs, replacement of capital items, and security. The City shall have no responsibility, indirect or direct, over management of the Development. The Owner shall ensure that the Development complies with the City of Marina’s BMR Housing Program Administrative Policies and Procedures as it currently exists and as it may be amended from time to time. The Owner shall retain a professional property management company approved by the City in its reasonable discretion to perform its management duties hereunder. A resident manager shall also be required at all times. The City hereby approves Interim, Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, as the Management Agent (as defined in Section 5.2).

Section 5.2 Management Agent. The Development shall at all times be managed by an experienced management agent reasonably acceptable to the City, with demonstrated ability to operate residential facilities like the Development in a manner that will provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing (as approved, the “Management Agent”). The Owner shall submit for the

EXHIBIT A
12 9
City’s approval the identity of any proposed Management Agent. The Owner shall also submit such additional information about the background, experience and financial condition of any proposed Management Agent as is reasonably necessary for the City to determine whether the proposed Management Agent meets the standard for a qualified Management Agent set forth above. If the proposed Management Agent meets the standard for a qualified Management Agent set forth above, the City shall approve the proposed Management Agent by notifying the Owner in writing. Unless the proposed Management Agent is disapproved by the City within thirty (30) days, which disapproval shall state with reasonable specificity the basis for disapproval, it shall be deemed approved.

Section 5.3 Performance Review. The City reserves the right to conduct an annual (or more frequently, if deemed reasonably necessary by the City) review of the management practices and financial status of the Development. The purpose of each periodic review will be to enable the City to determine if the Development is being operated and managed in accordance with the requirements and standards of this Agreement. The Owner shall cooperate with the City in such reviews. Notwithstanding the previous sentences, Owner may satisfy this requirement by providing to the City the reporting materials prepared for a public agency Development Lender.

Section 5.4 Replacement of Management Agent. If, as a result of a periodic review, the City determines in its reasonable judgment that the Development is not being operated and managed in accordance with any of the material requirements and standards of this Agreement, the City shall deliver notice to Owner of its intention to cause replacement of the Management Agent, including the detailed reasons therefor (a “Management Default Notice”). If the issues set forth in the Management Default Notice are not cured within sixty (60) days of delivery of the Management Default Notice, or if such default cannot be cured within sixty (60) days, if the cure is not commenced within sixty (60) days and diligently prosecuted thereafter, City staff and the Owner shall meet in good faith to consider methods for improving the financial and operating status of the Development, including, without limitation, replacement of the Management Agent.

If, after such meeting, City staff recommends in writing the replacement of the Management Agent, Owner shall, subject to the rights of any Development Lender, promptly dismiss the then Management Agent, and shall appoint as the Management Agent a person or entity meeting the standards for a Management Agent set forth in Section 5.2 above and approved by the City pursuant to Section 5.2 above.

Any contract for the operation or management of the Development entered into by Owner shall provide that the contract can be terminated as set forth above. Failure to remove the Management Agent in accordance with the provisions of this Section shall constitute default under this Agreement, and the City may enforce this provision through legal proceedings as specified in Section 5.6.

Section 5.5 Approval of Management Policies. Prior to initial leasing, the Owner shall submit its written management policies with respect to the Development to the City for its review and approval, which approval shall be deemed given if not denied within forty-five (45) days after notice is given to the City pursuant to the notice provisions of this Agreement. Owner shall amend such policies in any way necessary, to the extent not inconsistent with management policy requirements of a public agency Development Lender, to ensure that such policies comply

EXHIBIT A
13 10
with the provisions of this Agreement and provide a copy of the revised management policies to the City.

Section 5.6 Property Maintenance. The Owner agrees, for the entire Term of this Agreement, to maintain all interior and exterior improvements, including landscaping, on the Property in good condition and repair (and, as to landscaping, in a healthy condition) and in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, orders and regulations of all federal, state, county, municipal, and other governmental agencies and bodies having or claiming jurisdiction and all their respective departments, bureaus, and officials, and in accordance with the following maintenance conditions:

The City places prime importance on quality maintenance to ensure that all affordable housing projects within the City are not allowed to deteriorate due to below-average maintenance. Normal wear and tear of the Development will be acceptable to the City assuming the Owner agrees to provide all necessary improvements to ensure the Development is maintained in good condition. The Owner shall make all repairs and replacements necessary to keep the improvements in good condition and repair.

In the event that the Owner breaches any of the covenants contained in this section and such default continues for a period of fifteen (15) days after written notice from the City with respect to graffiti, debris, waste material, and general maintenance or thirty (30) days after written notice from the City with respect to landscaping and building improvements, then the City, in addition to whatever other remedy it may have at law or in equity, shall have the right to enter upon the Property and perform or cause to be performed all such acts and work necessary to cure the default. Pursuant to such right of entry, the City shall be permitted (but is not required) to enter upon the Property and perform all acts and work necessary to protect, maintain, and preserve the improvements and landscaped areas on the Property. Owner shall promptly pay to the City, upon demand, any costs incurred by the City in connection with work of protection, maintenance, and preservation undertaken by the City pursuant to this section, and the City may attach a lien on the Property, or to assess the Property, in the amount of such expenditures if Owner does not promptly reimburse the City upon demand.

ARTICLE 6

MISCELLANEOUS

Section 6.1 Lease Provisions. The Owner shall use a form of Tenant lease approved by the City. The form of Tenant lease shall also comply with all requirements of this Agreement, and shall, among other matters, to the extent permitted by Development Lenders and applicable laws:
(a) provide for termination of the lease and consent by the Tenant to immediate eviction for failure: (1) to provide any information required under this Agreement or reasonably requested by the Owner to establish or recertify the Tenant’s qualification, or the qualification of the Tenant’s household, for occupancy in the Development in accordance with the standards set forth in this Agreement, or (2) to qualify as an Eligible Household as a result of

EXHIBIT A
14 11
any material misrepresentation made by such Tenant with respect to the income computation or certification; and
(b) be for an initial term of not less than one (1) year. After the initial year of tenancy, the lease may be month to month by mutual agreement of the Owner and the Tenant; however the Rent may not be raised more often than once every twelve (12) months after such initial year. The Owner shall provide each Tenant with at least sixty (60) days’ written notice of any increase in Rent applicable to such Tenant, and with such further notice as may be required by Section 2.3 above.

Section 6.2 Nondiscrimination. All of the Affordable Units shall be available for occupancy on a continuous basis to members of the general public who are income eligible. The Owner shall obtain the City’s approval prior to implementing any preference for any particular class or group of person, provided, however, that the City hereby approves, for so long as required by Development Lenders, that the Units may be targeted for occupancy for persons who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, fleeing domestic or sexual violence, and other populations where supportive services would mitigate housing instability, with a preference for persons who have serious mental illness. There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons, on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, source of income (e.g. SSI, Housing Vouchers), age, ancestry, veteran status, or disability, in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of any Unit nor shall the Owner or any person claiming under or through the Owner, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy, of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants, or vendees of any Unit or in connection with the employment of persons for the construction, operation and management of any Unit.

Section 6.3 Section 8 Certificate Holders. The Owner will accept as Tenants, on the same basis as all other prospective Tenants, persons who are recipients of federal certificates for rent subsidies pursuant to the existing housing program under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act, or its successor. The Owner shall not apply selection criteria to Section 8 certificate or voucher holders that are more burdensome than criteria applied to all other prospective Tenants, nor shall the Owner apply or permit the application of management policies or lease provisions with respect to the Development which have the effect of precluding occupancy of units by such prospective Tenants.

Section 6.4 Term. The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to the Property for the entire Term. This Agreement shall bind any successor, heir or assign of the Owner, whether a change in interest occurs voluntarily or involuntarily, by operation of law or otherwise, except as expressly released by the City.

Section 6.5 Notice of Expiration of Term.
(a) At least six (6) months prior to the expiration of the Term, Owner shall provide by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a notice to all Tenants containing (i) the anticipated date of the expiration of the Term, (ii) any anticipated increase in Rent upon the expiration of the

EXHIBIT A
15 12
Term, (iii) a statement that a copy of such notice will be sent to the City, and (iv) a statement that a public hearing may be held by the City on the issue and that the Tenant will receive notice of the hearing at least fifteen (15) days in advance of any such hearing. (b) In addition to the notice required above, Owner shall comply with the requirements set forth in California Government Code Sections 65863.10 and 65863.11 as such statutes may be amended from time to time. Such notice requirements include: (i) a three year notice to existing tenants, prospective tenants and Affected Public Agencies (as defined in California Government Code Section 65863.10(a)) prior to expiration of the Term; (ii) a twelve (12) month notice to existing tenants, prospective tenants and Affected Public Agencies (as defined in California Government Code Section 65863.10(a)) prior to the expiration of the Term, (ii) a six (6) month notice requirement to existing tenants, prospective tenants and Affected Public Agencies prior to the expiration of the Term; (iii) a notice of an offer to purchase the Development to “qualified entities” (as defined in California Government Code Section 65863.11(d)).

Section 6.6 Covenants to Run With the Land. The City and the Owner hereby declare their express intent that the covenants and restrictions set forth in this Agreement shall run with the land and shall bind all successors in title to the Property, provided, however, that on the expiration of the Term of this Agreement said covenants and restrictions shall expire. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed covering or conveying the Development or the Property or any portion thereof, is to be held conclusively to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to such covenants and restrictions, regardless of whether such covenants or restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument, unless the City expressly releases such conveyed portion of the Development or the Property from the requirements of this Agreement.

Section 6.7 Enforcement by the City. If the Owner fails to perform any obligation under this Agreement, and fails to cure the default within thirty (30) days after the City has notified the Owner in writing of the default or, if the default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days, fails to commence to cure within thirty (30) days and thereafter diligently pursue such cure and complete such cure within ninety (90) days, or such longer period as reasonably approved by the City, in writing the City shall have the right to enforce this Agreement by any or all of the following actions, or any other remedy provided by law:
(a) Action to Compel Performance or for Damages. The City may bring an action at law or in equity to compel the Owner’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement, and/or for damages.
(b) Other Remedies. The City may exercise any other remedy provided under this Agreement or by law. Owner’s limited partners shall have the right to cure on behalf of Owner and City shall accept a cure therefrom as if such cure was made or tendered by Owner.

Section 6.8 Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. In any action brought to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to all costs and expenses of suit, including attorneys’ fees. This section shall be interpreted in accordance with California Civil Code Section 1717 and judicial decisions interpreting that statute.

EXHIBIT A
16 13
Section 6.9 Recording and Filing. The City and the Owner shall cause this Agreement, and all amendments and supplements to it, to be recorded in the Official Records of the County of Monterey.

Section 6.10 Governing Law and Recitals. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. The Recitals referenced above are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Jurisdiction for any dispute regarding this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court for the Monterey County or, in the United District Court for the Northern District of California, as applicable.

Section 6.11 Waiver of Requirements. Any of the requirements of this Agreement may be expressly waived by the City in writing, but no waiver by the City of any requirement of this Agreement shall, or shall be deemed to, extend to or affect any other provision of this Agreement.

Section 6.12 Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument executed by all the parties hereto or their successors in title, and duly recorded in the real property records of the County of Monterey.

Section 6.13 Notices. Any notice requirement set forth herein shall be deemed to be satisfied three (3) days after mailing of the notice first-class United States certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the appropriate party as follows:

Owner: Interim Inc.
604 Pearl Street
Monterey, CA 93940
Attention: Executive Director

With a Copy to: Goldfarb & Lipman LLP
1300 Clay Street, 11th Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Attention: Benjamin Funk

City: City of Marina
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California 93933
Attention: City Manager

With a Copy to: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, LLP
550 California Street, Suite 1200
San Francico, CA 94104
Attention: René Alejandro Ortega, City Attorney

Such addresses may be changed by notice to the other party given in the same manner as provided above.

EXHIBIT A
17 14
Section 6.14 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions of this Agreement shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

Section 6.15 Rights of Mortgagee. No violation of any provision contained herein shall defeat or render invalid the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value upon all or any portion of the Development or the Property, and the purchaser at any trustee’s sale or foreclosure sale shall not be liable for any violation of any provision hereof occurring prior to the acquisition of title by such purchaser. Such purchaser shall be bound by and subject to this Agreement from and after such trustee’s sale or foreclosure sale. Promptly upon determining that a violation of this Agreement has occurred, City shall give written notice to the holders of record of any mortgages or deeds of trust encumbering the Development or the Property that such violation has occurred, provided that Owner has provided City with notice of such mortgage or deed of trust including addresses for the holders of such mortgages or deed of trust and provided further, the City’s failure to give such notice shall not defeat or render invalid any notice of default given by the City to the Owner or prohibit the City from exercising any of its remedies.

Section 6.16 HHS Requirements. During the period that the United States of America (the “Federal Government”) has a right of reversion pursuant to the terms of the Quitclaim Deed entered into by the Federal Government acting through the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and the Owner, recorded in Reel 3388, Page 671, of the Official Records of the County of Monterey, State of California (the “HHS Deed”), the following provisions shall apply:
(a) Priority. The provisions of this Agreement are subject and subordinate to the rights of the Federal Government including, without limitation, the right of reversion contained in the HHS Deed. In the event of conflict between this Agreement and the HHS Deed, and the legal authorities referenced therein, the provisions of the HHS Deed, and the legal authorities referenced therein, shall control. The City and Owner further acknowledge and agree that, upon the Federal Government exercising its right of reentry under the HHS Deed, the Federal Government shall take the entire Property free and clear of any liens or other encumbrances.
(b) Federal Government’s Right of Unrestricted Access. The Federal Government has the right to enter and inspect the entire Property upon two (2) days’ notice except in the event of exigent circumstances, in which case such notice shall not be required. (c) Insurance. HHS shall be named as an additional insured on all insurance procured by the Owner with respect to the Development.
(d) Indemnity. Owner shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless HHS from any loss, liability, damage, cost, or expense (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) incurred by reason of any demands, claims, suits, actions, or proceeding arising from the acquisition, development and operation of the Development.

Section 6.17 Indemnity. Upon demand by the City, and in addition to any obligations set forth in the applicable land use permits and approvals, Owner shall indemnify, defend (with

EXHIBIT A
18 15
counsel reasonably selected by the City), and hold harmless the City and its councilmembers, commissioners, directors, officers, employees, agents, successors and assigns ( each an “Indemnified Party”) from and against any and all claims, liens, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, fines, penalties, charges, administrative and judicial proceedings and orders, and all costs incurred in connection therewith (including without limitation actual attorneys’ fees and costs of experts and consultants) arising from: (i) Owner’s performance or non-performance of its obligations hereunder; (ii) Owner’s lease of the Property; or (iii) the development, construction, marketing, rental and operation of the Development or the relocation of any occupants on the Property, except for claims arising solely from the negligence, willful misconduct, illegal acts, or breach of this Regulatory Agreement by any Indemnified Party. The indemnification obligations set forth in this Section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Regulatory Agreement.

Section 6.18 Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in this Agreement. All references to days in this Agreement are calendar days, unless explicitly referenced as a Business Day. The number of days specified in any provision of this Agreement shall be counted by excluding the first day and including the last day, unless the last day is a not a Business Day, in which case it shall be excluded. Any act required by this Agreement to be performed by a certain day is timely performed if completed before 5:00 p.m. local time on that date. If the day for performance of any obligation under this Agreement is not a Business Day, then the time for performance of that obligation is extended to 5:00 p.m. local time on the first day following that is a Business Day.

Section 6.19 Interpretation. The use in this Agreement of the words “including,” “such as” or words of similar import when used with reference to any general term, statement or matter shall not be construed to limit such statement, term or matter to the specific statements, terms or matters, unless language of limitation, such as “and limited to” or words of similar import are used with reference thereto. The headings of this Agreement are for convenience only and do not in any way limit or amplify the terms or provisions hereof. All pronouns and variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to the masculine, feminine, or neuter, and to the singular or plural, as the identity of the party or parties may require.

Section 6.20 No Limitation on Municipal Powers. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit, waive, or otherwise impair the authority and discretion of: (a) the City’s Community Development Department, in connection with the review and approval of any proposed construction plans for the Property (or any change to such plans), or any use, or proposed use, of the Property; or (b) any other office or department of the City acting in its capacity as a governmental regulatory authority with jurisdiction over the development, use, or operation of the Property.

Section 6.21 Complete Understanding of the Parties. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties with respect to the matters set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be construed as if it had been prepared by one of the Parties, but rather as if both Parties had prepared it. The Parties to this Agreement and their

EXHIBIT A
19 16
counsel have read and reviewed this Agreement and agree that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party (including but not limited to California Civil Code Section 1654 as may be amended from time to time) shall not apply to the interpretation of this Agreement.

Section 6.22 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original.

[SIGNATURES FOLLOW]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Owner have executed this Agreement by duly authorized representatives, all on the date first written above.

OWNER:

Interim Inc.,
a California nonprofit public benefit corporation

By: _____________________
Name: Rhiyan Quiton
Title: Executive Director

EXHIBIT A
20 17
ATTEST: CITY:

City of Marina, a municipal corporation

By: _______________________ By: ____________________________________ Layne Long, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _______________________________
René Alejandro Ortega, City Attorney

EXHIBIT A
21 18

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)
COUNTY OF __________________ )

On ____________________, before me, ___________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared ______________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
______________________________________
Name: ______________________________
Notary Public

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

EXHIBIT A
22 19

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)
COUNTY OF __________________ )

On ____________________, before me, ___________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared ______________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
______________________________________
Name: ______________________________
Notary Public

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

EXHIBIT A
23 20

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

The land is situated in the City of Marina, County of Monterey, State of California, and is described as follows:

For APN/Parcel ID(s): 031-081-005-000

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF MARINA, COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL 1, AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY MAP FILED NOVEMBER 9, 1995 IN VOLUME 19 OF
SURVEYS, AT PAGE 116, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL WATER RIGHTS AS RESERVED IN THE QUITCLAIM DEED EXECUTED BYTHE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RECORDED JUNE 27, 1996 IN REEL 3388, PAGE 671, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

EXHIBIT A
24 B–

EXHIBIT B
Site Plan

2070993.1

EXHIBIT A
25 May 29, 2026 Item No. 10g(2)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 2, 2026

RECOMMENDATION TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO.
2026-___, APPROVING FY 2026 -2027 AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBITS A

AND B OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN
ReGen MONTEREY AND ITS MEMBER AGENCIES REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH SB 1383, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE

CITY ATTORNEY, AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO
MAKE NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 2026- :

1. Approving FY 2026 -2027 amendments to Exhibits A and B of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between ReGen Monterey and its member agencies regarding compliance with SB 1383;

2. Authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the agreement on behalf of the City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney; and

3. Authorizing the Finance Director to make any necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

BACKGROUND:

The State of California adopted Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383), California’s Short -Lived Climate Pollutants legislation, establishing statewide mandates intended to reduce organic waste disposal and increase edible food recovery throughout the state.

SB 1383 requires jurisdictions to reduce organic waste disposal by 75 percent from 2014 levels and recover at least 20 percent of edible food currently disposed of for human consumption. The regulations became effective January 1, 2022, and impose ongoing compliance responsibilities on local jurisdictions, including public education, edible food recovery coordination, contamination monitoring, procurement of recovered organic waste products, inspections, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements.

In response to these state mandates, the member agencies of ReGen Monterey determined that it was in their best interest to coordinate regional compliance activities related to SB 1383.

Participating agencies further determined that ReGen Monterey possesse s the expertise and resources necessary to implement certain compliance activities on behalf of member jurisdictions in a coordinated and cost-effective manner.

As a result, the Monterey Regional Waste Management District (DBA ReGen Monterey) and its member agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding establishing a framework for shared SB 1383 compliance activities and proportional cost sharing among participating agencies.

1 1
The original MOU became effective July 1, 2021, and includes annual updates to EXHIBIT A that pertains to Detailed Activities and Costs , and EXHIBIT B that details Member Agencies’ Annual Proportionate Shares and Costs.

The agreement is supported through the ReGen Monterey Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), which consists of representatives from member agencies, haulers, and ReGen Monterey staff.

ANALYSIS:

Each fiscal year, ReGen Monterey evaluates anticipated expenses associated with regional SB 1383 compliance activities and updates EXHIBITS A and B accordingly. The annual scope of work includes activities necessary to maintain compliance with state regulations and to support participating jurisdictions with ongoing implementation requirements.

The FY 2026-2027 Exhibit A budget includes regional activities associated with SB 1383 program administration, edible food recovery program coordination, outreach and technical assistance to edible food generators and food recovery organizations, commercia l and multi -family organics outreach, contamination monitoring, public education and media outreach, procurement compliance support, reporting and recordkeeping systems, and Technical Advisory Committee coordination.

New for FY 2026 -2027 are several activities that were previously funded through CalRecycle Local Assistance Grant Program (LAGP) funding but must now be directly funded by participating member agencies due to expiration of those grant funds. These activiti es include procurement of organic materials such as compost, commercial and multi -family organics outreach, additional edible food recovery outreach and technical assistance, and continuation of the Sort with Heart public education campaign.

Overall program costs increased approximately seven percent compared to the prior fiscal year due to the expiration of grant funding and increased compliance -related program costs necessary to maintain compliance with SB 1383 requirements.

Under Exhibit B, the City of Marina’s FY 2026-2027 proportional share is $75,399. This allocation includes Marina’s participation in regional compliance activities, contamination monitoring, outreach programs, edible food recovery coordination, procurement compliance support, and shared reporting systems.

Participation in the regional program allows the City to continue leveraging shared technical expertise, coordinated outreach, centralized reporting support, and regional program efficiencies associated with increasingly complex state solid waste regulations.

The proposed amendments do not create additional independent regulatory obligations beyond those already imposed upon the City pursuant to SB 1383 and related state regulations.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City of Marina’s FY 2026-2027 proportional share under the MOU is $75,399.

The annual cost represents the City’s share of regional SB 1383 compliance activities administered through ReGen Monterey, including public education, edible food recovery support, contamination monitoring, procurement compliance assistance, reporting supp ort, and related program administration.

2 2
Funding for the City’s participation is anticipated to be incorporated into the Public Works Department Solid Waste and Recycling budget. ReGen Monterey invoices participating member agencies twice annually pursuant to the terms of the MOU.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The proposed action is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), which excludes “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.”

EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A – FY 2026-2027 Amendments to Exhibit A – Detailed Activities and Costs Exhibit B – FY 2026-2027 Amendments to Exhibit B – Member Agencies’ Annual Proportionate Shares and Costs
Exhibit C – Memorandum of Understanding Between ReGen Monterey and Member Agencies Regarding Assistance with Compliance with SB 1383

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

3 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF MARINA APPROVING FY 2026-2027 AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBITS A AND B OF THE

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN REGEN MONTEREY

AND ITS MEMBER AGENCIES REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH
CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL 1383, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE

CITY SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY

ATTORNEY, AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE
NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES.

WHEREAS, the State of California adopted Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383), establishing statewide requirements related to organic waste reduction, edible food recovery, and landfill diversion; and WHEREAS, SB 1383 regulations impose ongoing compliance responsibilities upon local jurisdictions, including public education, edible food recovery coordination, contamination monitoring, procurement compliance, inspections, recordkeeping, and reporting obligations; and WHEREAS, member agencies of ReGen Monterey previously entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to coordinate regional SB 1383 compliance activities in an efficient and cost - effective manner; and
WHEREAS, the Memorandum of Understanding authorizes annual amendments to Exhibits A and B to establish updated program activities, costs, and member agency proportional shares; and WHEREAS, the proposed FY 2026-2027 amendments continue regional coordination of SB 1383 compliance activities and allocate the City of Marina’s proportional share of program costs.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Marina as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves FY 2026-2027 amendments to Exhibits A and B of the Memorandum of Understanding between ReGen Monterey and its member agencies regarding compliance with SB 1383.

2. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute all necessary documents and take all actions required to effectuate this agreement, subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

3. The Finance Director is authorized to make necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, duly held on the 2nd day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 4
Task # SB 1383 Fee Category Detail FY 26/27 Budget Notes 1 HF&H General Support & TAC meetings Task #5 (general support) & task #6 (monthly TAC meetings) of HF&H FY 2026 proposal 14,000$
2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity
Building
$50,000 for ReGen portion of grant allocations $10,500
for grant administration
60,500$
Grants offered jointly by ReGen &
SVR. County is omitted from this
line item.
3 Edible Food Recovery Program
Administration
Capacity Assessment Updates - Living Document
FRO Annual Capacity Survey Updates
Other support (TBD):

Edible Food Outreach - Follow-up target groups
Organics Collections Outreach - Follow-up target groups School Food Waste Reductions - Targeted groups
Conference presentations
15,635$
ReGen member agency portion
only. Split 50/50 with SVR.
4 Outreach & Technical Assistance to
FROs and EFGs
Outreach and technical assistance for food recovery
organizations (FROs) and Edible Food Generators (EFGs), Careit App support 19,170$
Previously funded by CalRecycle
LAGP grants.
5 Edible Food Generator Inspections for
Tier 1 & 2
Inspections only
4,602$
Omits County of Monterey as they
perform their own inspections
6 Commercial and Multi-Family Organics
Outreach
Provide outreach, education, and technical assistance
support to targeted multi-family and commercial
businesses 9,450$
Previously funded by CalRecycle
LAGP grants.
7 Public Education Design/creation of public education materials ($5k). Does not include production or distribution of materials created.

Continuation of Sort with Heart campaign ($25k media
placement inclusive of booking fees).
30,000$
Sort with Heart campaign
previously funded by CalRecycle
LAGP grant.
8 Contamination Monitoring (Lid Flipping)
18,400$
Omits County of Monterey due to
WM Smart Truck.
9 Recyclist Fees Cloud-based recordkeeping and reporting system shared by haulers, jurisdictions and processor.
14,002$
Omits County & City of Monterey,
who subscribe separately.
10 ReGen Monterey Staff Time Coordination and Hosting of Monthly TAC Meetings Hosting and/or participating in TAC Subcommittees
SB 1383 Program Coordination and Implementation
CalRecycle Reporting Support - Electronic Annual Report & Implementation Records
75,000$
260,759$
Member Agency Annual Procurement Target (tons of compost) Cost @ $5/ton using
direct-service
provider agreement Notes
Carmel-by-the-Sea 187 935.00$
Del Rey Oaks 78 390.00$
Marina 1,017 5,085.00$
Monterey 1,317 6,585.00$
Pacific Grove 721 3,605.00$
Sand City 18 90.00$
Seaside 1,491 7,455.00$
Pebble Beach CSD 210 1,050.00$
Unincorporated County (West)* 3071 15,355.00$
ReGen Monterey Total 8,110 40,550.00$
HF&H Franchise Management Fees
Task # FY 26/27 Budget Notes
$16,000
$3,000
$3,000
$50,000
$24,000
Franchise Management Total $96,000
Exhibit A Total 381,954$
Exhibit A
Detailed Activities and Costs
FY 2026-2027
SB 1383 Procurement of Organic Material
(Cost per member agency feeds directly into Exhibit B)
Franchise Management services
are for GreenWaste member
agencies only (omitting the City and
County of Monterey).
*The County of Monterey has
separate procurement MOU w/
ReGen through 2027. Their amount
is not included in this total.

SB 1383 Total

1. Review Contractor's Quarterly Reports

2. Review Contractor's Annual Report

3. Review Franchise Fee Payments

4. Review Contractor's Annual Rate Adjustments

8. Monitor Contract Compliance
5 5
1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN THE MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND ITS

MEMBER AGENCIES REGARDING ASSISTANCE WITH COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL 1383
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is made and entered into as of the date of the signatures set forth below by and between the MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (“District”, “MRWMD”), a California Garbage and Refuse Disposal District, and its member agencies including the cities of CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA, DEL REY OAKS, MARINA, MONTEREY, PACIFIC GROVE, SAND CITY, and SEASIDE; THE PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT; and THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY (“Member Agencies”). Collectively these entities shall be known herein as “Parties” or individually as a “Party.”
Recitals
A. The State of California has passed legislation, known as Senate Bill 1383, California’s Short-Lived Climate Pollutants regulation. The regulation will have significant impact on each Member Agency, with the goal of reducing organic material being landfilled by 75% by 2025, compared to a 2014 basis. The legislation mandates that Member Agencies undertake certain activities around the handling of organic waste materials collected within their jurisdictions. The regulation also requires 20% recovery of edible food by 2025 to direct it to a beneficial use and thus prevent it from entering the waste stream. Regulations take effect, and local program implementation will begin, on January 1, 2022.

B. The Member Agencies have determined that it is in their best interest to coordinate their activities related to this legislation. This coordination is being facilitated by the District’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) comprised of staff from each Member Agency, the three Haulers in the District service area (Haulers), Salinas Valley Recycles (SVR) and MRWMD.

C. The Member Agencies have further determined that the District has the expertise and resources necessary to implement some of these activities on the Member Agencies’ behalf and have now requested that the District incur costs to provide these activities.

D. The Member Agencies have agreed to reimburse the District for proportionate shares of certain designated annual costs incurred by the District for these activities.

E. The form and content of this MOU have been presented to the TAC, and the TAC has recommended it for approval by the Parties
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the District and the Member Agencies, and of the promises contained in this MOU, the Parties agree as

EXHIBIT B
6 2
follows:

Section 1. Recitals: The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this MOU.

Section 2. Purpose: The purpose of this MOU is to provide a structure for the Member Agencies to reimburse the District for SB 1383 related activities it performs on behalf of the Member Agencies.

Section 3. Voluntary: This MOU is voluntarily entered into by the Parties for the purpose of facilitating the implementation of SB 1383.

Section 4. Term: This MOU shall become effective on the last day of its execution by a Party and shall remain in effect until terminated by the Parties.

Section 5. Scope of Work, Costs & Cost Sharing: The scope of work, and associated costs, are set out in Exhibit A, entitled Detailed Activities and Costs, attached hereto and incorporated herein. Allocation of such costs to the Member Agencies is set out in Exhibit B, entitled Member Agencies’ Annual Proportionate Shares and Costs, attached hereto and incorporated herein. Exhibit C outlines estimated individual Member Agencies’ allocations related to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program (OWR1: 2021-22), attached hereto and incorporated herein. Exhibit D defines the estimated annual procurement requirements of organic material and estimated cost per ton of compost for each Member Agency, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

No later than March 1 of each year, and at such other times as directed by the Parties, the TAC shall meet to consider and, if deemed necessary, modify Exhibits A, B, C, and/or D subject to direction from the governing bodies of each Member Agency to its TAC representative.

Section 6. The District Agrees:

(a) District staff will manage activities as identified in Exhibit A, C, and D which activities include contracting with third party vendors when reasonably necessary and paying those vendors for contracted costs.

(b) Two times per year, on dates to be determined by the TAC, District will invoice Member Agencies for each Member Agency’s proportionate share of costs as shown in Exhibit B with each invoice to be fifty percent (50%) of the Member Agency’s share of costs.

(c) Upon award of CalRecycle SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program funds, the District will invoice Member Agencies for their full allocation of grant funds as shown in Exhibit C. Four times during the grant term, aligned with dates identified by CalRecycle grant Terms & Conditions, the District shall report to Member Agencies a summary of actual grant expenditures and progress toward grant tasks to date.

EXHIBIT B
7 3

(d) District will maintain an accounting of activities and expenses and provide reconciliation of payments annually. Material differences between estimated costs and actual incurred costs will result in either: 1) an adjustment made to the final annual payment for each Member Agency, or 2) such cost difference shall be incorporated into the subsequent year cost allocation.

(e) In year one only, in recognition of expected continuation of improved recycling revenues for the District from recyclable material sales, the District will off-set $140,000 of the costs identified in Exhibit A. This off-set is reflected in the cost allocations set out in Exhibit B for FY 2021-22.

Section 7. The Member Agencies Agree:

(a) To reimburse the District for all expenses incurred by the District under this MOU in accordance with each Member Agency’s proportionate share as shown on Exhibit B, C, and D.

(b) To make a full-faith effort to cooperate with one another and with the District to achieve the purposes of this MOU by providing information, reviewing information in a timely manner, and informing their respective administration and governing bodies.

Section 8. Termination. Any Party may terminate its participation in this MOU upon giving written notice to the District no later than April 1 of any calendar year during the term of this MOU. Within ten days following a Party’s termination date, such party shall pay District all charges then due and payable and shall pay when determined any additional charges that shall later come due under the MOU, subject to the limits set out in Exhibits A, B, C, and D.

Section 9. General Provisions.

(a) This MOU is binding and for the benefit of the respective successors, heirs, and assigns of each Party and the District; provided however, no Party may assign its respective rights or obligations under this MOU without the prior written consent of the District.

(b) This MOU is governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

(c) If any provision of this MOU is determined by any court to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, then the remainder of this MOU will not be affected, and this MOU will be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this MOU.

(d) Waiver by the District or any Party to this MOU of any term, condition, or covenant of this MOU will not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant.

EXHIBIT B
8 4
Waiver by the District or any Party of any breach of the provisions of this MOU will not constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this MOU.

(e) This MOU may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which is an original but all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument, provided, however, that such counterparts have been delivered to all parties to this MOU.

(f) All parties acknowledge they have been represented, or have had the opportunity to be represented, by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this MOU. Accordingly, this MOU will be construed according to its fair language. Any ambiguities will be resolved in a collaborative manner by the District and the Parties and must be rectified by amending this MOU.
(g) This MOU supersedes and replaces all prior MOUs between the District and the Parties hereto relating to the subject matter of this MOU.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the District and the Parties have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date of their respective signatures.

MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT B
9 5

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT B
10 6

CITY OF DEL REY OAKS

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT B
11 7

CITY OF MARINA

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT B
12 8

CITY OF MONTEREY

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT B
13 9

CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT B
14 10

SAND CITY

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT B
15 11

CITY OF SEASIDE

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT B
16 12

PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT B
17 13

COUNTY OF MONTEREY

By: ________________________ DATE: _______________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________

EXHIBIT B
18 Task # SB 1383 Fee Category Detail FY 26/27 Budget Notes 1 HF&H General Support & TAC meetings Task #5 (general support) & task #6 (monthly TAC meetings) of HF&H FY 2026 proposal 14,000$
2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity
Building
$50,000 for ReGen portion of grant allocations $10,500
for grant administration
60,500$
Grants offered jointly by ReGen &
SVR. County is omitted from this
line item.
3 Edible Food Recovery Program
Administration
Capacity Assessment Updates - Living Document
FRO Annual Capacity Survey Updates
Other support (TBD):

Edible Food Outreach - Follow-up target groups
Organics Collections Outreach - Follow-up target groups School Food Waste Reductions - Targeted groups
Conference presentations
15,635$
ReGen member agency portion
only. Split 50/50 with SVR.
4 Outreach & Technical Assistance to
FROs and EFGs
Outreach and technical assistance for food recovery
organizations (FROs) and Edible Food Generators (EFGs), Careit App support 19,170$
Previously funded by CalRecycle
LAGP grants.
5 Edible Food Generator Inspections for
Tier 1 & 2
Inspections only
4,602$
Omits County of Monterey as they
perform their own inspections
6 Commercial and Multi-Family Organics
Outreach
Provide outreach, education, and technical assistance
support to targeted multi-family and commercial
businesses 9,450$
Previously funded by CalRecycle
LAGP grants.
7 Public Education Design/creation of public education materials ($5k). Does not include production or distribution of materials created.

Continuation of Sort with Heart campaign ($25k media
placement inclusive of booking fees).
30,000$
Sort with Heart campaign
previously funded by CalRecycle
LAGP grant.
8 Contamination Monitoring (Lid Flipping)
18,400$
Omits County of Monterey due to
WM Smart Truck.
9 Recyclist Fees Cloud-based recordkeeping and reporting system shared by haulers, jurisdictions and processor.
14,002$
Omits County & City of Monterey,
who subscribe separately.
10 ReGen Monterey Staff Time Coordination and Hosting of Monthly TAC Meetings Hosting and/or participating in TAC Subcommittees
SB 1383 Program Coordination and Implementation
CalRecycle Reporting Support - Electronic Annual Report & Implementation Records
75,000$
260,759$
Member Agency Annual Procurement Target (tons of compost) Cost @ $5/ton using
direct-service
provider agreement Notes
Carmel-by-the-Sea 187 935.00$ Del Rey Oaks 78 390.00$ Marina 1,017 5,085.00$ Monterey 1,317 6,585.00$ Pacific Grove 721 3,605.00$ Sand City 18 90.00$ Seaside 1,491 7,455.00$ Pebble Beach CSD 210 1,050.00$
Unincorporated County (West)* 3071 15,355.00$
ReGen Monterey Total 8,110 40,550.00$ HF&H Franchise Management Fees
Task # FY 26/27 Budget Notes
$16,000
$3,000
$3,000
$50,000
$24,000
Franchise Management Total $96,000
Exhibit A Total 381,954$
Exhibit A
Detailed Activities and Costs
FY 2026-2027
SB 1383 Procurement of Organic Material
(Cost per member agency feeds directly into Exhibit B)
Franchise Management services
are for GreenWaste member
agencies only (omitting the City and
County of Monterey).
*The County of Monterey has
separate procurement MOU w/
ReGen through 2027. Their amount
is not included in this total.

SB 1383 Total

1. Review Contractor's Quarterly Reports

2. Review Contractor's Annual Report

3. Review Franchise Fee Payments

4. Review Contractor's Annual Rate Adjustments

8. Monitor Contract Compliance

EXHIBIT B
19 # %
Per Agency
Cost/Year
With $8,500
Minimum # %
Per Agency
Cost/Year
With $1,500
Minimum
Carmel 3,220 2.9% 5,981 $ 8,500$ Carmel 3,220 2.9% 675$ 1,500$ DRO 1,592 1.5% 2,957 $ 8,500$ DRO 1,592 1.5% 334$ 1,500$ Marina 22,359 20.4% 41,529 $ 37,943$ Marina 22,359 20.4% 4,688$ 3,800$ PG 15,090 13.8% 28,028 $ 25,608$ PG 15,090 13.8% 3,164$ 2,565$ PBCSD 4,531 4.1% 8,416 $ 8,500$ PBCSD 4,531 4.1% 950$ 1,500$ Sand City 325 0.3% 604 $ 8,500$ Sand City 325 0.3% 68$ 1,500$ Seaside 32,366 29.5% 60,116 $ 54,925$ Seaside 32,366 29.5% 6,786$ 5,501$ Monterey City 30,218 27.5% 56,126 $ 51,280$ Monterey City 30,218 27.5% 6,336 $ 5,136$ County 53,915 20,000 $ 20,000$ County 53,915 - $ - $ TOTAL 163,616 223,755 $ 223,755$ TOTAL 163,616 23,002$ 23,002$ *SB 1383 tasks 1-4, 6, 7 & 10 *SB 1383 tasks 5 & 8
# %
Per Agency
Cost/Year
With $5,000
Minimum
Carmel Carmel 3,220 4.1% 4,456$ 5,000$ DRO DRO 1,592 2.0% 2,203 $ 5,000$
Marina Marina 22,359 28.1% 30,944$ 28,571$ PG PG 15,090 19.0% 20,884$ 19,283$
PBCSD PBCSD 4,531 5.7% 6,271$ 5,790$ Sand City Sand City 325 0.4% 450 $ 5,000$ Seaside Seaside 32,366 40.7% 44,794$ 41,358$ Monterey City TOTAL 79,483 110,002$ 110,002$ TOTAL *SB 1383 task 9
With
Minimums
Carmel 15,935$
DRO 15,390$
Marina 75,399$
PG 51,060$
PBCSD 16,840$
Sand City 15,090$
Seaside 109,239$
Monterey City 63,001$
County 20,000$
TOTAL 381,954$
* Member agencies' proportionate costs subject to adjustment annually in accordance with any change in scope and total costs.

Table 1 Table 2
Table 3 Table 4
Population
Population
25,195.00$
1,017
721
210
SB 1383 Procurement of Organic Material HF&H Franchise Management Fees and Recyclist Fees* Population
Population
5,039
Cost @ $5/ton using direct-
service provider agreement
935$
390$
5,085$
1,050$
90$
7,455$
6,585$
3,605$
# %
3,220
1,592
22,359
15,090
4,531
325
32,366
30,218
53,915
163,616
Per Agency Cost/Year
12,047$
5,884$
82,246$
55,681$
381,954$

2.0%

1.0%

13.7%

9.2%

2.8%

0.2%

19.8%

18.5%

33.0%
100.0%
16,687$
1,212$
119,151$
69,047$
20,000$
Exhibit B
Member Agencies' Annual Proportionate Shares of Costs*
FY 2026-2027
Table 5 - Total Costs by Agency
Member Agencies will be invoiced an annual amount not to exceed column below titled "With Minimums" HF&H General Support; EFR Capacity, Admin & Technical Assistance; COM & MFD Outreach; Pub Ed; & ReGen Staff Time* Edible Food Generator Inspections and Contamination Monitoring* 1,317
18 1,491
Population
Annual Procurement
Target (tons of compost)
187
78 EXHIBIT B
20 MEMO
Meeting Date: May 22, 2026
To: Board of Directors
From: Director of Communications, Zoë Shoats
Approved by: General Manager, Felipe Melchor
Subject: Approve FY27 Amendments to Exhibits A & B of the MOU between ReGen Monterey and its Member Jurisdictions Regarding Compliance with California’s Senate Bill 1383

RECOMMENDATION
Approve FY27 Amendments to Exhibits A & B of the MOU between ReGen Monterey and its Member Jurisdictions regarding compliance with California’s Senate Bill 1383.

BACKGROUND
The State of California has passed legislation, known as Senate Bill 1383, California’s Short-Lived Climate Pollutants legislation. The regulation has significant impact on each Member Agency with the goal of reducing organic material being landfilled by 75% by 2025, compared to a 2014 basis. The legislation mandates that Member Agencies undertake certain activities around the handling of organic waste materials collected within their jurisdictions. The regulation also requires 20% recovery of edible food by 2025 to direct it to a beneficial use and thus, prevent it from entering the waste stream. Regulations took effect and local program implementation began on January 1, 2022.

In 2021, the Member Agencies determined that it was in their best interest to coordinate their activities related to this legislation. This coordination is being facilitated by ReGen Monterey’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) comprised of staff from each Member Agency, the three haulers in our service area (Haulers) and ReGen Monterey.

The Member Agencies determined that ReGen Monterey has the expertise and resources necessary to implement shared activities on the Member Agencies’ behalf and requested that ReGen incur costs to provide these activities. The Member Agencies have agreed to reimburse ReGen for proportionate shares of certain designated annual costs incurred by ReGen for these activities under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Monterey Regional Waste Management District (DBA ReGen Monterey) and its Member Agencies Regarding Assistance with Compliance with California Senate Bill 1383.

The purpose of the MOU is to provide a structure for the Member Agencies to reimburse ReGen Monterey for SB 1383 related activities it performs on behalf of the Member Agencies. The MOU was voluntarily entered into by the Parties for the purpose of facilitating the implementation of SB 1383.

EXHIBIT C
21 The MOU was adopted by the ReGen Monterey Board on June 18, 2021, the Member Agencies soon thereafter, and became effective July 1, 2021.

 Exhibit A - Detailed Activities and Costs: Contains the scope of work, and associated costs related to general SB 1383 activities. (Enacted June 2021, updated annually.)  Exhibit B - Member Agencies’ Annual Proportionate Shares and Costs: Allocation of such costs to the Member Agencies. (Enacted June 2021, updated annually.)

DISCUSSION
Each year ReGen Monterey staff identifies expected expenses associated with jurisdictional compliance of SB 1383 and compiles those expenses in Exhibit A of the MOU. Expenses include items such as program administration; public education; monitoring; reporting; and edible food recovery capacity building, program administration, and outreach.

These expenses are then broken down to proportional percentages per population in Exhibit B.

The draft budget is first presented to the TAC for review, feedback, and consensus. It then is presented to the ReGen Monterey Board of Directors and Member Agencies’ Councils and Boards for approval.

The amendment to Exhibits A and B of the MOU would apply to FY 27 and in lieu of exhibits covering previous fiscal years.

New for FY 2027 are some activities that were previously funded by CalRecycle Local Assistance Grant Program (LAGP) that now must be funded directly by the Member Agencies. This includes mandated programs for procurement of organic material (compost); commercial and multi-family organics outreach; and increased funding for increased public education to continue with media spending for the
Sort with Heart campaign. Overall, the expired grant funds and other cost increases have necessitated a year-over year cumulative increase of 7% to achieve compliance. This shared funding strategy remains an immense value for our Member Agencies to achieve compliance with SB 1383.

FISCAL IMPACT

None. These are the costs that ReGen Monterey incurs and is then reimbursed by our Member Agencies, with invoicing occurring twice annually.

CONCLUSION

ReGen Monterey will continue to support its Member Agencies with SB 1383 compliance in a way that provides cost savings for the communities we serve.

/ /

EXHIBIT C
22 May 27, 2026 Item No. 10h(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 2, 2026

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 202 6-,

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO

ACCEPT A DEED FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF THE EXTENSION OF
2ND AVENUE FROM SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO THE

CITY OF MARINA , AND TO TAKE ALL OTHER ACTIONS

NECESSARY TO ACCEPT AND RECORD SAID GRANT DEED S ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MARINA

RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council consider

1. Adopting Resolution N o. 2026-, authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a deed for the conveyance of the extension of 2 nd Avenue as shown on Exhibit B, and described therein, from Shea Homes Limited Partnership to the City of Marina and to take all other actions necessary to accept and record said deed on behalf of the City of Marina.

BACKGROUND:

At the regularly scheduled meeting of May 31, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2005-127, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the University Village Development Project.

At the regularly scheduled meeting of May 31, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2005-128, approving the General Plan Amendments, Resolution No. 2005 -130, for the Specific Plan, Resolution No. 2005 -131, for the Tentative Map and Resolution No. 2005 -132, Design Review for the regional retail, the Village Promenade, and all residential phases for the former University Village Development Project.

At the regularly scheduled meeting of December 17, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019 -140, approving an Operating Agreement as an administrative amendment of the Development Agreement clarifying and modifying certain project approvals for Specific Plan for The Dunes on Monterey Bay including to the Conforming Clarifications to the Schedule of Performance.

At the regularly scheduled meeting of September 21, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-102, approving the creation of public utility easements on City properties for utility improvements benefiting Opportunity Site 1A (now “Phase 2 North”) within the Specific Plan boundaries of The Dunes on Monterey Bay development project subdivision.

At the regularly scheduled meeting of December 7, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -133, a uthorizing the City Manager to give an option exercise notice to Marina Community Partners to acquire the Hotel Site portion of Opportunity Site 1A in accordance with the terms of the Operating Agreement between the City and Marina Community Partners.

At the regularly scheduled meeting of January 11, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-03, authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Hotel Development Agreement with Dadwal Management Group or its designee for the development of Hotels on Opportunity S ite 1A in the Dunes Development.

1 At the regularly scheduled meeting of November 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-120, authorizing the City Manager to accept/execute a deed for the conveyance of an extension of 2nd Avenue, and to take all other actions necessary to accept and record said deed on behalf of the City of Marina. See Exhibit A. This portion of 2 nd Avenue extended from the intersection of Imjin Parkway to approximately 693 feet northward to the southern boarder of Parcel D as identified on the recorded Phase 2 North Parcel Map for the commercial properties within Phase 2 North (previously known as “Opportunity Site 1A”) on March 8, 2022, in Volume 24 of Parcel Maps page 16 (“EXHIBIT A”).

At the regular scheduled meeting of May 19, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-54, accepting the right of way improvements within the 2 nd Avenue extension previously dedicated to the City in 2023.

ANALYSIS:

The Dunes Specific Plan and Amended Tentative Map shows 2nd Avenue extending to the northern limits of Phase 2 North, providing a connection to future residential streets within this Phase. Shea Homes Limited Partnership (“Developer”) has proposed to dedicate the remainder of 2 nd Avenue that is currently within Parcel D ( “EXHIBIT B” ). Once the Phase 2 North Residential Final Map is completed and submitted to the City for recording, improvement plans and a public improvement agreement will also be submitted to the City for all improvements within this newly dedicated right of way.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Should the City Council approve this request, the City will require the Developer to provide improvement plans and a public improvement agreement for the final design of improvements within the right of way including vehicle and bicycle facilities, sidewalks, streetlights and stormwater facilities. These facilities will be incorporated into the existing Dunes Community Facilities District (CFD) and funded by the special tax assessment collected by the special District. Administration of the District shall be in accordance with City Municipal Code Ch.

3.32. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The approval of the Phase 2 North Public Improvement Agreement between the City of Marina and Shea Homes, LP, and the authorization of the execution of a deed for the conveyance of the extension of 2nd Avenue from Shea Homes, LP, to the City of Marina were generally anticipated and analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project and certified by the City Council through its adoption of Council Resolution No. 2005 -127 on May 31, 2005 (SCH # 2004091167).

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Edrie Delos Santos, P.E.

Engineering Division
Public Works Department
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________ ____________________
Ismael Hernandez Layne Long
Public Works Director City Manager
City of Marina City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A GRANT DEED FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF THE EXTENSION OF 2ND

AVENUE, AND TO TAKE ALL OTHER ACTIONS NECESSARY TO

ACCEPT AND RECORD SAID GRANT DEEDS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY

OF MARINA

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 31, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2005 -128, approving the General Plan Amendments, Resolution No. 2005 -130, for the Specific Plan, Resolution No. 2005 -131, for the Tentative Map and Resolution No. 2005 - 132, Design Review for the regional retail, the Village Promenade, and all residential phases for the former University Village Development Project, and;

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of December 17, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019 -140, approving an Operating Agreement as an administrative amendment of the Development Agreement clarifying and modifying certain project approvals for Specific Plan for The Dunes on Monterey Bay including to the Conforming Clarifications to the Schedule of Performance, and;

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of September 21, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -102, approving the creation of public utility easements on City properties for utility improvements benefiting Opportunity Site 1A (now “Phase 2 North”) within the Specific Plan boundaries of The Dunes on Monterey Bay development project subdivision, and;

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of December 7, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -133, a uthorizing the City Manager to give an option exercise notice to Marina Community Partners to acquire the Hotel Site portion of Opportunity Site 1A in accordance with the terms of the Operating Agreement between the City and Marina Community Partners, and;

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of January 11, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -03, authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Hotel Development Agreement with Dadwal Management Group or its designee for the development of Hotels on Opportunity Site 1A in the Dunes Development, and;

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of November 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023 -120, authorizing the City Manager to execute/accept a grant deed for the conveyance of an extension of 2 nd Avenue, and to take all other actions necessary to accept and record said deed on behalf of the City of Marina. This portion of 2 nd Avenue extended from the intersection of Imjin Parkway to approximately 693 feet northward to the southern boarder of Parcel D as identified on the recorded Phase 2 North Parcel Map for the commercial properties within Phase 2 North (previously known as “Opportunity Site 1A”) on March 8, 2022, in Volume 24 of Parcel Maps page 16 (“EXHIBIT A”), and;

WHEREAS, at the regular scheduled meeting of May 19, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026 -54, accepting the right of way improvements within the 2 nd Avenue extension previously dedicated to the City in 2023.

3 Resolution 2026-
Page Two

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby authorize the City Manager or his designee to accept a deed for the conveyance of the extension of 2 nd Avenue as shown on Exhibit B, and described therein, and to take all other actions necessary to accept and record said grant deeds on behalf of the City of Marina.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Anita Sharp, City Clerk

4 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

CITY OF MARINA
211 HILLCREST AVENUE
MARINA, CALIFORNIA 93933
PH: (831) 884­1212
FAX: (831) 384­0425
Dunes Phase 2 North Parcel Map (Vol.24 Par Pg.16)
with Right of Way Dedications
(previously Opportunity Phase 1A)
Exhibit A
05/27/2026
SCALE: NONE
LEGEND:

Right of way Dedicated
per CC Reso. 2023-120
Remaining Right of Way
to be Dedicated
5 3140 Legal Desc - Del Monte Intx ROW Dedication.docx

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION OVER A PORTION OF
PARCEL D, VOLUME 24 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 16
Certain real property in the City of Marina, County of Monterey, State of California, described as follows:

Being a portion of Parcel D, as shown on the map filed in Volume 24 of Parcel Maps at Page 16 in the Records of said County, more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said Parcel D, said point also being the northwesterly corner of Lot 3, as shown on the map filed in Volume 23 of Cities and Towns maps at Page 36 in the Records of said County, thence along the easterly boundary of said Parcel D
1) South 01°40'53" West, 192.33 feet to the northeasterly corner of the portion of said Parcel D described as a right-of-way dedication in the City of Marina Resolution No. 2023-120; thence departing said easterly boundary and along the northerly boundary of said right-of-way dedication
2) North 88°19'07" West, 138.00 feet to a point on the westerly boundary of said Parcel D; thence along said westerly boundary
3) North 43°18'53" West, 14.85 feet; thence
4) North 88°18'39" West, 11.99 feet; thence departing said westerly boundary
5) North 01°40'10" East, 52.00 feet; thence
6) South 88°18'39" East, 14.78 feet; thence
7) North 61°40'53" East, 8.93 feet; thence
8) North 01°40'53" East, 125.76 feet to a point on the northerly boundary of said Parcel D; thence along said northerly boundary
9) South 88°09'23" East, 138.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 0.638 acres, more or less.

As shown on the plat attached hereto and made a part hereof.

END OF DESCRIPTION

EXHIBIT B TO

STAFF REPORT
DRAFT
6 3140 Legal Desc - Del Monte Intx ROW Dedication.docx
PREPARED BY:

WHITSON ENGINEERS
________________________________ 01/05/2026__
RICHARD P. WEBER, LS DATE
L.S. No. 8002
Job No.: 3140.35
7 DEL MONTE BLVD
(PER CITY OF MARINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-120)

PARCEL D
24 PM 16
PARCEL D24 PM 16
PROJECT No.:

T:\Monterey Projects\3140\SURVEY\LEGAL DESC\Phase 2N\3140 PLAT - ROW Dedication Del Monte Intx.dwg Civil Engineering +
Land Surveying
6 Harris Court
Monterey, CA 93940
831.649.5225
whitsonengineers.com
3140.35

CITY OF MARINA, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL D, VOL. 24-PM-PG. 16
JANUARY 2026

RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION
EI N E
S
ONW
E
N
I TH S
G R
8 May 28, 2026 Item No. 11a
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the Marina City Council June 2, 2026

CITY COUNCIL TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2026-, APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT AND A TREE

REMOVAL PERMIT FOR A NEW MERCEDES -BENZ CAR DEALERSHIP AT OPPORTUNITY AREA 3.2 OF THE DUNES DEVELOPMENT (2101 FIRST

AVENUE), AND FIND THIS ACTION WAS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED IN EIR NO. 2004091167, CERTIFIED FOR THE UNIVERSITY VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN.

SUMMARY
The matter before the City Council is for site and architectural design review per Chapter 17.56 of the Marina Municipal Code (“MMC”) and a tree removal permit per MMC Chapter 17.62 to establish a new Mercedes -Benz dealership by the applicant, Unstoppable Automotive MBMCA, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Mercedes-Benz of Monterey, at Opportunity Area

3.2 of the Dunes Development (formerly University Villages), located at 2101 First Avenue. These types of permits are typically reviewed by the Planning Commission, but a condition of approval of the Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement by City Council on May 20, 2025 (“Incentive Package”), was that the Council would review and approve said permits.1

RECOMMENDATION

1. That City Council open a public hearing and adopt City Council Resolution 2026- approving a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of 44 trees and approval of a Design Review Permit in support of a new car dealership on the property located at 2101 First Avenue (Opportunity Area 3.2 of the Dunes Development).

2. Find that any environmental impacts from the recommended action have been previously reviewed in the environmental impact report for the University Village Specific Plan EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167) as set forth in Exhibit A, Findings of Fact.

DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT
On May 19, 2026, Staff presented this Project and the City Council deliberated on the design review and tree removal permits for the Project.2 During this hearing the item was tabled to provide Staff with the opportunity to follow up on additional information requests from the City Council. 1 See City Council Resolutions 2025 -49, 2025-83, and 2026 -45 for details . The City of Marina, through the implementation of the 2000 General Plan, desires to encourage private investment and economic development within the City’s commercial areas. The applicant is proposing the construction and operation of a $40 million invest ment in the City of Marina and as such requested an Incentive Package from the City to offset this investment in the project site. Because the Council has retained final approval authority pursuant to the Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement, the design review and tree removal permits now before the Council come for the Council’s final action , rather than for action by the Planning Commission or the Community Development Director under the ordinary review procedures set forth in MMC Chapters 17.56 and 17.62. The Tree Committee and Planning Commission have made their respective recommendations to the Council, as described in further detail below. Please see Exhibit B, Condition of Approval #28 for details.
2 See Attachment 1, Staff Report, May 19, 2026.
1 AMENDED STAFF REPORT
Includes Correct Exhibit B and
Attachment 2 after Exhibit I
Can the applicant provide a list of special events that will typically occur on an annual basis? The applicant will provide the city with the list of special events prior to or at the June 2, 2026 Council meeting. Condition of Approval #54 has been added stating special events shall occur on the property per the City’s Special Event Ordinance which will be reviewed by the City Council in the Summer of 2026.

Can you clarify the delivery of truck routes and the hours of delivery of said vehicles to the car dealership?
Here is a proposed truck route for the dealership, which basically shows trucks driving down HWY 1, exiting Light fighter, and making a left onto DIVARTY. No unloading of vehicles on First Avenue would be allowed. Delivery hours vary from 7 am – 10 pm

Can the applicant provide an updated photo simulation /video to the Council showing the viewshed from HWY 1?
Yes, an updated photosimulation will be shared with the City Council at the June 2, 2026, Council meeting.

Can language be added to the master sign program about prohibiting banners, signs and other unsightly signage?
Yes. The car dealership Master Sign Program will incorporate by reference the Dunes Master Sign Program (MSP) that prohibits balloons, inflatable signs, banners and other unsightly signage. The Dunes MSP can be found here: https://cityofmarina.org/DocumentCenter/View/12853.3

What is the size of the Temecula Mercedes Benz monument sign? The sign is ten feet tall by seventy -five feet in width . Without a master sign program, a normal commercial site in Marina would be limited to a 7-foot-tall monument sign that is 200 square feet.4

3 Amended on June 13, 2024 by Planning Commission Resolution # 2024-13. 4 See Section 17.46.170 of the Sign Ordinance.
2 The City monument sign will come back to Council for approval. The image in the May 19, 2026 City Council Staff Report is a conceptual image only.

Can city staff provide specific background information on the noise standards for the City of Marina?
Allowable average noise standards are as identified in Tables 4.1 and 4.2 of the City’s General Plan.5 The General Plan allows 70 Ldn dBa during the day and 65 Ldn dBa at night for residential zones “as determined at the property line of the receiver,” which means that to measure noise from the car dealership you would hold a meter at the edge of a residential parcel — the property line of whoever is receiving the noise. You would not measure noise at the dealership's property line, nor next to the noise source itself. See Table 4.2. Further, these noise limits are 24-hour- average noise standards, not single-event noise standards. Whether a single noise event might individually exceed 70 Ldn dBa (day) or 65 Ldn dBa (night) does not necessarily constitute a violation of the General Plan or City’s noise ordinance. For land use or planning purposes, cities often compare these levels to common standards:
• Normal conversation: ~60 dBa or
• A busy street traffic: ~70–85 dBa

A typical commercial publicly accessible car wash can range from about 70 to 100 decibels (dB) depending on the equipment and where you are standing . Here, the proposed car wash is not a commercial publicly accessible car wash like the Quick -Quack car wash on Beach Road. The proposed car wash would only be used on cars that are serviced by the dealership at its Service Shop. Washing of vehicles will be on the east side of the Project site, facing Highway 1, and away from future residential uses to the north. Additionally, service of vehicles will be conducted in enclosed service bays, with access doors closed.

To address concerns regarding potential noise impacts, Staff recommends adding C ondition of Approval COA #55 on the project as follows:

• Vehicle deliveries (car carriers, parts trucks) restricted to between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m., Monday through Saturday; no Sunday or holiday deliveries. • All service bay doors shall be closed during operations producing noise audible at the northern property line, including air-tool use, impact wrench use, and engine running. • Outdoor PA systems and paging prohibited; all internal communications via silent paging only.
• Backup alarms on all dealership -owned and -leased vehicles operating on -site shall use broadband (white -noise) technology rather than tonal beepers, consistent with OSHA - recognized alternatives.
• Outdoor detailing operations (pressure washing, blowing), if any, limited to between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.

5 The University Villages Specific Plan (UVSP) is silent on objective noise standards. Absent guidance in the UVSP, the noise standards in the City’s General Plan apply. See University Villages Specific Plan, p. 88. 3 • Outdoor vacuum stations, if any, shall be located as far as feasible from adjacent residential properties and shall incorporate noise -reducing equipment and acoustical shielding.

Vacuum station operations shall be limited to 10 a.m. to 6pm. • No exterior alarm horns, sirens, or audible signaling devices except for code -required fire alarms.
• All rooftop HVAC equipment shall be acoustically screened and rated such that noise at the nearest residential property line does not exceed the applicable Marina General Plan Table 4.2 standard for the time of day.

Additionally, Staff recommend Condition of Approval COA #56, requiring preparation of an acoustical analysis to ensure compliance with the City’s noise standards set forth in Tables 4.2 of the General Plan.

COA #56-Acoustical Analysis
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a project -specific acoustical analysis prepared by a qualified acoustical engineer demonstrating compliance with the City’s Noise Ordinance and General Plan Table 4.2. The analysis shall evaluate operational noise associated with tunnel equipment, blower dryers, vacuum stations, vehicle circulation, and any proposed outdoor mechanical equipment.

Noise Attenuation Measures
The project applicant shall implement all noise attenuation measures identified in the approved acoustical analysis, which may include, but are not limited to:
• installation of acoustical barriers or masonry walls; • enclosure of blower and mechanical equipment;
• use of low-noise vacuum and dryer equipment;
• acoustical insulation and sound-absorbing materials;
• increased setbacks from sensitive receptors, such as residential; and • orientation of noise-generating equipment away from residential uses.

Operational Noise Limits
Project operations shall comply with the City’s adopted noise standards at all property lines of the Project. If noise complaints are substantiated by the City following project occupancy, the applicant/operator shall implement additional corrective measures identified by a qualified acoustical consultant to achieve compliance.

Post-Construction Verification
Prior to final occupancy, the applicant shall provide verification from a qualified acoustical consultant confirming that all required noise mitigation measures have been installed and that operational noise levels comply with applicable City standards.

City staff reached out to the City of Temecula, and they indicated they have not received a noise complaint about the car wash or the repair services portion of the business.

Can city staff provide more specific lighting standards for this project? The 2002 Design Guidelines were adopted with specific lighting standards (see Exhibit H). The Guidelines have specified that light sources are to be generally subdued, with uniform lighting patterns with a minimum potential for glare with combinations of indirect lighting sources as opposed to fewer, more direct powerful direct lighting sources.

4 Additionally, the University Village Specific Plan (Dunes Development) Environmental Impact Report Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) also has requirements that lighting levels in the commercial areas be kept as “low as feasible” to address any nighttime ambient light increases in the Fort Ord Dunes State Park. Mitigation Measure AE-3.1 provides:

Implement light reduction and screening measures to reduce nighttime ambient light increases in the Fort Ord Dunes State Park.

(a) Keep lighting levels (i.e., intensity/foot-candles) in commercial areas as low as feasible.

Install light sources so that there is no light radiation above the horizontal plane (i.e. ‘dark sky’). Focus lighting downward and prevent the splay of ambient light to other areas.

Whenever feasible, use path-level or bollard-type fixtures that keep the light source closer to the ground. Use color -tinted and lower wattage lamps to help reduce lighting -related disturbance.

(b) Control lighting systems in commercial areas to minimize operating time. Employ an appropriate combination of time scheduling, photo switching, and motion sensors. It is reasonable and feasible that lighting be controlled in the above manner commencing two hours after sunset and two hours before sunrise.

Additionally, the best management practices (BMPs) lighting standards from the City of Calabasas were brought to Staff’s attention at the last Council meeting.6 As a result, City staff have reached out to Giacalone Design , a firm that, along with their subconsultant, ALR Consulting, have provided lighting consultation for the entire Dunes Development. Staff had a discussion with these consultants on May 26, 2026, and they indicated that the Calabasas lighting standards provided to Staff at the last Council meeting by Councilmember McCarthy are reasonable and achievable for this project. Andrew Cummings from Giacalone Design will be available at the June 2, 2026 City Council meeting to answer specific lighting questions.

To implement measurable and achievable lighting standards for this project consistent with the Dunes EIR mitigation measures set forth above , Staff recommends the following edits for Condition of Approval #25 (COA#25):

25. Lighting. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall be required to submit a detailed lighting plan to ensure dark sky principles are incorporated into the final design of the building and project as a whole. The comprehensive exterior lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval to the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director may request that the Planning Commission review and approve said lighting plan consistent with the procedure set forth in Sec tion 17.55.040 (Review Process) where sufficient public concern warrants a public hearing. The plan shall include fixture specifications, mounting heights, photometric data, shielding details, color temperature, and illumination levels throughout the site. Additionally, e xterior lighting fixtures shall be adequately shielded to a point below the light bulb and reflector prevent unnecessary glare onto adjacent properties. Based on input from the City Council at May 19 and June 2, 2026, additional lighting re quirements to the extent feasible, shall be incorporated into the final lighting plan . After installation, the Community Development Director or designee shall retain the right to require reduction in the intensity of illumination or change of light color if said illumination creates any undue public nuisance or is not consistent with applicable mitigation measures for the University Villages Specific Plan (now Dunes) EIR. The following shall be shown within the construction drawings:

6 See Exhibit I (Council Questions) for the Carlsbad Lighting Standards. 5 a. The project shall provide step -down lighting as the project is adjacent to residential neighborhoods. The step-down lighting shall occur each evening between the following intervals: 6:00 P.M., 7:30 P.M, and 10:30 P.M. The applicant shall be required to provide a photometric study of light output prior to 10PM and after 10PM. The lighting level shall be the minimum to maintain security and safety for the property at no more than a two (2) light candles average for the property. The lighting plan shall be evaluated for compliance with Lighting Zone 2 (LZ 2) 7 standards, rather than LZ3 for car dealerships.
b. In addition to the fixed clock-time step-downs, all non-security lighting shall be reduced to security-level only during the period commencing two hours after sunset and ending two hours before sunrise, consistent with MM AE-3.1.
c. Site lighting systems and showroom lighting shall be grouped into control zones to allow for open, closing, and night light/security lighting schemes. All control groups shall be controlled by an automatic lighting control system utilizing a time clock, p hotocell, and low voltage relays.
d. Full Cut -Off Fixtures -All exterior lighting fixtures shall utilize full cut -off or fully shielded luminaires designed and installed to prevent glare, spillover, and light trespass onto adjacent properties and public rights -of-way consistent with Illuminati ng Engineering Society (IES) standards.
e. Maximum Fixture Height-Freestanding parking lot and vehicle display lighting fixtures shall not exceed twenty-two (22) feet in height.
f. Color Temperature -General site and parking lot lighting shall maintain a correlated color temperature (CCT) of no greater than 3000 Kelvin to minimize glare and nighttime light pollution.
g. Light Trespass Prohibited -All exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining residential properties and streets. Lighting shall be arranged and shielded to prevent direct illumination, glare, or spillover onto adjacent parcels or public rights-of-way with an average foot candle of .5 and a maximum of 1.0 foot candles. h. Lighting shall also be designed to prevent direct illumination, glare, or spillover onto Fort Ord Dunes State Park across Highway 1, consistent with Mitigation Measures AE-

3.1 and BR-7.1 of the University Village EIR. The Photometric and Lighting Plan shall demonstrate that vertical illuminance at the western project boundary does not exceed

0.1 foot-candles, calculated to a height of 33 feet above the tallest luminaire i. Photometric Standards-The applicant shall provide a photometric plan demonstrating that lighting levels are adequate for vehicle display and public safety while maintaining a uniform and subdued lighting pattern. Average illumination levels shall be minimi zed to the greatest extent feasible and avoid excessive brightness associated with automobile display lighting with a average foot candles of .5 and a maximum of 1.0. j. Automatic Controls-All exterior lighting shall be controlled by automatic timers and/or photocells. Non-security lighting, including vehicle display lighting, shall be reduced or turned off after business hours, except for the minimum lighting necessary fo r site security and safety.

7 The International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) and the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) have developed the Model Lighting Ordinance (MLO) to address the need for strong, consistent outdoor lighting regulation. The MLO User ’s Guide explicitly classifies car dealerships under LZ3 (moderately high ambient lighting), not LZ2. Here, however, Staff is proposing LZ2 for the Project. The MLO User’s Guide describes LZ2 as:
“light commercial business districts and high density or mixed use residential districts. Includes neighborhood business districts; churches, schools and neighborhood recreation facilities; and light industrial zoning with modest nighttime uses or lighting requirements.”
6 k. Building-Mounted Lighting-Building-mounted lighting fixtures shall be attached only to walls or eaves and shall not project above the roofline or parapet. All lighting shall have full cutoff.
l. Consistency with City Standards -All lighting improvements shall comply with the applicable provisions of the City of Marina University Village Environmental Impact Report, the University Village Specific Plan, the 2002 Design Guidelines and Standards, Title 24 energy regulations, and all applicable municipal code requirements.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Council members or Planning Commissioners are subject to the Political Reform Act. C ouncil Members or Planning Commissioners must not make, participate in making, or attempt to influence in any manner a governmental decision which they know, or should know, may have a material effect on the financial interest of a Council Member or Planning Commissioner.

EX PARTE COMMUNICATION DISCLOSURES
On quasi -judicial matters, City Councilmembers shall verbally disclose off the record contacts relating to the item, after the item is called and before C ity Council consideration of the matter.

Disclosure shall include the identity of an individual(s) with whom the C ity Council had contact, and the nature of the contact. Written ex parte communications must be forwarded to the Community Development Department so they can be provided to the entire Commission and to the public.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The City of Marina Planning Division has determined that this project will not result in new significant environmental impacts or effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects previously identified in EIR No. 2004091167, which was certified for the University Villages Specific Plan. See CEQA Guidelines § 15183; Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21083.3(b).

The Specific Plan and its associated EIR contemplated that “recreational vehicle” sales and/or rentals would be a use permitted by right at the project location; passenger vehicle sales at this location is consistent with the originally anticipated permitted use and would not result in any previously unidentified impacts. The Specific Plan and EIR also anticipated that “hundreds” of trees would be removed as a result of the overall project, requiring mitigation pursuant to the City’s tree removal ordinance and University Village Specific Plan tree replacement standards.

See Findings of Fact, EXHIBIT A.

CONCLUSION
This staff report, resolution, and associated exhibits are submitted for City Council consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

Guido F. Persicone, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

ATTACHMENTS
May 19, 2026, Staff Report
Exhibit A-Findings of Fact
Exhibit B-Project Conditions of Approval
Exhibit C-Site Plan
Exhibit D-Project Narrative
Exhibit E-Arborist Reports
April 18, 2025
May 12, 2025
February 2026
Exhibit F-Project Comment Letters
Exhibit G-Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement (with
City Council Resolutions 2025-49, 2025-83, and 2026-45) Exhibit H-2002 Design Guidelines, Lighting Standards.

Exhibit I-City Council Project Questions, dated May 20, 2026
Exhibit J-June 2, 2026, Applicant Submittal
Information

7 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT AND A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT FOR A NEW MERCEDES-BENZ CAR DEALERSHIP AT OPPORTUNITY AREA 3.2 OF THE DUNES DEVELOPMENT (2101 FIRST AVENUE); AND FIND THIS ACTION WAS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED IN EIR NO. 2004091167, CERTIFIED FOR THE UNIVERSITY VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN.

WHEREAS, per a Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement approved by Council on May 20, 2025 (“Incentive Agreement”) the applicant, Unstoppable Automotive MBMCA, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Mercedes -Benz of Monterey (“Unstoppable Group”), an d the City have agreed per Council Resolutions 2025-49, 2025-83, and 2026-45, that the City Council retains final decision -making authority over the Design Review and Tree Removal Permits for this project; and
WHEREAS, on April 30, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing held on the property located at the northwest corner of First Avenue and Divarty Street, the Tree Committee of the City of Marina considered a tree removal permit request to remove trees within Phase 3 of the Dunes Development and specifically within Opportunity Areas 3.2, 4.2, and 4.3 of the University Villages Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the April 30, 2025, meeting the item was continued for further review to the May 15, 2025 Tree Committee meeting; and
WHEREAS removal of 44 trees is necessary to accommodate the completion of the Dunes Development Project (formerly the University Village Specific Plan); and WHEREAS, by removing trees from the site and making it a viable commercial property, the tree removal permit will be implementing the 2000 General Plan via policies 2.74 and 2.4.3; and WHEREAS, removal of trees is subject to a Tree Removal Permit and requires review by the Tree Committee for a recommendation to the Planning Commission per Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Sec. 17.62.060.B; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of May 15, 2025, Tree Committee meeting, a favorable recommendation was made to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the applicant shall replace all qualifying trees at a 2:1 ratio per MMC section

17.62.060.D.2 based upon the combined diameter at breast height (DBH) of the healthy trees to be removed; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing the Planning Commission recommended approval of the design review and tree removal permits to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the proposed automobile dealership project is consistent with the City’s Design Review criteria and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare as set forth in the Staff Report and Findings of Fact; and

8 Resolution No. 2026-
Page Two

WHEREAS, the project has been designed to support attractive and functional commercial use while maintaining compatibility with the character of the City of Marina and the surrounding area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Marina is a lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project will not result in new significant environmental impacts or effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects previously identified in EIR No. 2004091167, which was certified for the University Villages Specific Plan. See CEQA Guidelines § 15183; Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21083.3(b). The Specific Plan and its associated EIR contemplated that “recreational vehicle” sales and/or rentals would be a use permitted by right at the project location; passenger vehicle sales at t his location is consistent with the originally anticipated permitted use and would not result in any previously unidentified impacts. The Specific Plan and EIR also anticipated that “hundreds” of trees would be removed as a result of the overall project, requiring mitigation pursuant to the City’s tree removal ordinance and University Village Specific Plan tree replacement standards.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, based on Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval, and the CEQA determination referenced hereto, does hereby:

1. Find that any environmental impacts from the recommended action have been previously reviewed in the environmental impact report for the University Village Specific Plan EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167) as set forth in the Findings of Fact.

2. Incorporate by reference the recitals listed above, the staff report accompanying this resolution, the Findings of Fact and the project revised Conditions of Approval as presented by City staff at the May 19, 2026 and June 2 2026 City Council meetings. (Exhibits A and B to this Resolution).

3. Approve a Design Review Permit for a new car dealership on the property located at 2101 First Avenue (Opportunity Area 3.2 of the Dunes Development).

4. Approve the removal of forty -four (44) trees subject to Chapter 17.62 of the Marina Municipal Code and the University Villages Specific Plan tree replacement standards.

5. Direct the applicant (Unstoppable Group) to replant replacement trees at a 2:1 ratio for every tree that is removed that are in fair or good condition which include twenty-two (22) trees.

6. Require the applicant (Unstoppable Group) to comply with the Conditions of Approval and the recommendation from the arborist reports submitted by Denise Duffy and Associates on April 18, 2025, May 12, 2025, and February 2026, incorporated by reference into this resolution.

7. Require the applicant (Unstoppable Group) to retain trees #712 and #752 to the extent feasible. If said trees cannot be retained the applicant shall submit documentation for review by the Community Development Director as to why removal is required.

8. Require the applicant (Unstoppable Group) to comply with the Incentive Agreement conditions of approval per City Council Resolutions 2025-49, 2025-83, 2026-45.

9. Require the applicant to file a Master Sign Program (MSP) for the project for Planning Commission consideration and approval prior to occupying the building.

9 Resolution No. 2026-
Page Three

10. To require the applicant to receive City Council approval for the monument sign along the westerly border of the property prior to occupying the building.

11. Direct staff to prepare and submit a Notice of Exemption (NOE) to the County Clerk within five days of approval by the City Council.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a duly noticed special on the 2nd day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBER:
_____________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

_____________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

10 May 14, 2026 Item No.11b
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of May 19, 2026

CITY COUNCIL TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2026-, APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT AND A TREE

REMOVAL PERMIT FOR A NEW MERCEDES -BENZ CAR DEALERSHIP AT OPPORTUNITY AREA 3.2 OF THE DUNES DEVELOPMENT (2101 FIRST

AVENUE), AND FIND THIS ACTION WAS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED IN EIR NO. 2004091167, CERTIFIED FOR THE UNIVERSITY VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN.

SUMMARY
The matter before the City Council is for site and architectural design review per Chapter 17.56 of the Marina Municipal Code (“MMC”) and a tree removal permit per MMC Chapter 17.62 to establish a new Mercedes -Benz dealership by the applicant, Unstoppable Automotive MBMCA, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Mercedes-Benz of Monterey, at Opportunity Area

3.2 of the Dunes Development (formerly University Villages), located at 2101 First Avenue. These types of permits are typically reviewed by the Planning Commission, but a condition of approval of the Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement by City Council on May 20, 2025 (“Incentive Package”), was that the Council would review and approve said permits.1

RECOMMENDATION

1. That City Council open a public hearing and adopt City Council Resolution 2026- approving a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of 44 trees and approval of a Design Review Permit in support of a new car dealership on the property located at 2101 First Avenue (Opportunity Area 3.2 of the Dunes Development).

2. Find that any environmental impacts from the recommended action have been previously reviewed in the environmental impact report for the University Village Specific Plan EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167).

DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT
Marina Municipal Code Standards for Design Review
MMC Chapter 17.56 (Site and Architectural Design Review) requires design review approval before construction of new commercial development. Its purpose is to ensure that buildings and improvements are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance, and that they do not hinder the orderly development of the City, impair the desirability of residence or investment, or impair living conditions on adjacent sites. In acting on the application, the reviewing body considers:
1 See City Council Resolutions 2025 -49, 2025-83, and 2026 -45 for details . The City of Marina, through the implementation of the 2000 General Plan, desires to encourage private investment and economic development within the City’s commercial areas. The applicant is proposing the construction and operation of a $40 million invest ment in the City of Marina and as such requested an Incentive Package from the City to offset this investment in the project site. Because the Council has retained final approval authority pursuant to the Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement, the design review and tree removal permits now before the Council come for the Council’s final action , rather than for action by the Planning Commission or the Community Development Director under the ordinary review procedures set forth in MMC Chapters 17.56 and 17.62. The Tree Committee and Planning Commission have made their respective recommendations to the Council, as described in further detail below. Please see Exhibit B, Condition of Approval #28 for details.
1 ATTACHMENT
11 • Site planning and compatibility with surrounding development; • Architectural design, building mass, and scale;
• Exterior materials, colors, and fenestration;
• Landscaping and lighting; and
• Signage.

The analysis below demonstrates that the project satisfies these standards, the development standards of the University Village Specific Plan, and the 2000 General Plan. See also, EXHIBIT A, Findings of Fact.

Architecture. The proposed 57,000 square foot project consists of a contemporary, two -story commercial building designed in a modern corporate architectural style, consistent with current automotive dealership branding standards. The building massing is defined by a primary showroom volume expressed a s a taller, rectilinear form, complemented by lower adjoining elements. The front elevation is characterized by a prominent glazed showroom façade, extending approximately two stories in height, which provides transparency and visual connectivity between the interior display area and the public realm. The showroom volume is articulated with a defined fascia band, with the top of fascia reaching approximately 31 feet above grade and the bottom of fascia at appro ximately 28 feet. This creates a strong horizontal datum line and emphasizes the building’s primary frontage.

Secondary building components include a parts mezzanine level at approximately 12 feet and a second level at approximately 14 feet above grade. These elements are integrated within the overall massing and are visually subordinate to the main showroom volume.

The building elevations exhibit a clean and minimalist design language, utilizing a combination of smooth exterior wall panels, metal cladding, and extensive glazing. The façade composition emphasizes horizontal and vertical alignment, with large window expanses framed by metal panel systems to create a sleek, high -quality appearance. See EXHIBITS C and D, Project Narrative and Plans.

All elevations (north, south, east, and west) maintain consistent architectural treatment, with variations in glazing and solid wall areas responding to functional interior uses. The overall design conveys a contemporary aesthetic with an emphasis on transparency, precision detailing, and brand identity. The project has been designed by Gensler and reflects current trends in commercial and automotive retail architecture.2 The project meets all of the development standards as identified in the University Village Specific Plan, the Zoning Code and the 2000 General Plan. See Table 1.

2 Per the Incentive Package, the applicant agreed to provide an updated photo simulation of the project, which will be presented to the Council on May 19, 2026.
2 ATTACHMENT
12 Development Standards.

Table 1-Development Standards
Standard Source Complies
Zoning Section 3.1.4 of the
Development Agreement.

Yes-Automotive Sales
allowed per City
interpretation of the Dunes
Development Agreement (see
Section 3.1.4 of the DA); see
also University Villages
Specific Plan at p.104;
Recreational Vehicle Sales
allowed per Specific Plan.

Westerly Setback along
Freeway-100 foot setback
Figure 4.15 of the 2000
General Plan
Yes-100 feet
North/South/East Setbacks-20
ft setback
Table 5.4 of the UVSP Yes-20 feet
Landscape Buffer-25-foot
landscape buffer along HWY 1
Highway 1 Design Corridor Yes-25 feet
Height-40 Feet Figure 4.15 of the General
Plan
Yes-28-31 feet
Floor Area Ratio - between
.25-.60
General Plan Table 2.43 Yes-.25 FAR
Parking
236 Required

UVSP-Section 5.7
Parking:
1:300 square feet (office
area)
1:275 square feet (retail
area)
Yes- 366 provided

Bike Parking- 1 rack per
building
UVSP-Section 5.7

Yes-with COA #17

Additional Considerations:

Zoning. The University Villages Specific Plan designates this parcel in the Specific Plan Area as Office/Research and Development/Light Industrial, including Opportunity Site 3. The Office/Research designation permits a variety of uses including boat sales and recreational vehicle sales. The Specific Plan did not expressly list automobile sales as a principally permitted use in the Office/Research and Development/Light Industrial land use areas but does allow automobile sales in other non-residential areas of the development including in the Multiple Use designation.

However, the University Villages Specific Plan expressly provides that the list of principally permitted uses “is not intended to prohibit an omitted but related use. [And, further, that] [a]ny uses not specifically regulated here shall be considered through administrative review.4”

The City of Marina (“City”) and Marina Community Partners, LLC (“MCP”) entered into a Development Agreement dated July 8, 2005 (“Development Agreement”) related to the Dunes Development Project. Section 3.1 of the Development Agreement addresses amendments to the Development Agreement and to the Project Approvals. Section 3.1.4 of the Development Agreement grants the Strategic Development Director authority to make minor modifications to

3 Floor Area Ratio is total square footage of a building, including first, second, third floor divided by the lot size.

Table 5.4 of the UV Specific Plan directs the city staff to Table 2.4 of the General Plan. 4 Development Regulations, University Village Specific Plan, pg 104. https://cityofmarina.org/1194/The-Dunes- University-Village
3 ATTACHMENT
13 the Project Approvals as an administrative amendment. The City previously eliminated the position of Strategic Development Director and vested the City Manager with the authority and job duties previously assigned to the Strategic Development Director.

The proposed dealership will have both automobile and recreational vehicles sales as both Mercedez Benz automobiles and Sprinter Van vehicles will be sold on site. Since recreational vehicle sales are allowed in this zone and automobile sales is a related use and allowed in the Multiple Use designation of the specific plan, the City Manager, on December 1, 2023, designated automobile sales as a permitted use for this site based on the authority granted in University Villages Specific Plan (p. 104) and the Development Agreement Section 3.1.4 .

Landscaping. The Tree Committee requested that more California native species be incorporated into the final landscaping plans, that, to the extent feasible, trees #712 and #752 be preserved, and that native species be used more extensively within the landscaping .5 Both of these requests are included as Conditions of Approval (“COA”)6 #45 and #46-#47 in the project.

Parking. To ensure the project does not interfere with abutting properties, the City will require a parking plan that clearly denotes customer and employee parking, see Condition of Approval #21.

To minimize incongruity between the project and Phase 3 of the Dunes, Condition of Approval #42 has been placed on the permit requiring a parking study within one year of operation of the project.

Traffic Control Plan . The project will include a traffic control plan to coordinate construction activity and limit disruptions to neighboring properties , see Condition of Approval #30. The project is designed to have necessary deliveries and parking occur onsite so that there is no spillover of activity on the streets or neighboring properties.

Noise. Due to the project location adjacent to residential neighborhoods , a silent paging system throughout the project site shall be implemented. No loudspeakers shall be used as part of daily business operations , see Condition of Approval #22. While the applicant has stated that a loudspeaker is typically not used in their business model, it is important that this condition be kept on the project for future possible uses of the site.

Lighting. The goal of the site lighting for the property is to provide a comfortable level of illumination that meets the operation’s need for orientation and safety in a way that complements the aesthetic quality of project architecture and surrounding coastal environment.

The proposed lighting standards are intended to incorporate Dark Sky principles by reducing unnecessary glare, light spill, and skyglow while maintaining adequate safety and visibility. Dark Sky practices promote the use of fully shielded, downward -directed lighting fixtures, lower illumination levels where appropriate, and warmer color temperature lighting to minimize impacts on surrounding residential areas, wildlife, and nighttime visibility. These standards help preserve community character and views of the night sky, improve energy efficiency, and reduce light trespass onto adjacent properties and public rights -of-way. The intent is to balance public safety and functional lighting needs with environmental stewardship and neighborhood compatibility.

5 In discussing planting recommendation last year with the vice chair of the tree committee, suggestions were made to introduce some additional Coastal CA natives into the plant palette including but not limited to: Toyon, Rhamnus, Arctostaphylos, Ceanothus, Ribes, Berberis, Holodiscus, Baccharis, Myrica, Mimumlus, and many others. Our native plant selection ultimately to choose from include s Arctostaphylos, Artemisia, Baccharis, Ceanothus, Diplacus (Mimulus), Erigeron, Eriogonum, Frangula (Rhamnus), Fragaria, Heteromeles (Toyon), Leymus and Symphoricarpos, and are shown as such on the Preliminary Plant Legend. All are identified also as C.C.N. (CA Coastal Native). 6 The Project Conditions of Approval are identified on Exhibit B. 4 ATTACHMENT
14 To reduce incompatibility between the car dealership and abutting residential properties , a Condition of Approval has been placed on the permit requiring submi ttal of a lighting plan ( see COA #25) for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits.

The Conditions of Approval also include language that the City retains the right to ask for additional modifications in the future if said lighting is deemed a public nuisance. For reference, the lighting condition placed on this permit is similar in nature to the Mercedes -Benz dealership in Temecula, which staff used as a template for preparing these project Conditions of Approval.

DESIGN REVIEW GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY

General Plan Policy 4.79 To promote the City’s objective of creating a demographically and economically balanced community, a wide range of housing options shall be provided, the cost and mix of which shall be approximately proportional to the housing needs of existing and future employed people within the City. Housing shall be balanced with commercial uses, providing for retail and services and for office, research, commercial service and industrial uses.

By issuing a design review permit for the car dealership site, Opportunity Area 3.2 (2101 First Avenue) allows for the balanced land uses identified in General Plan Policy

4.79. General Plan Policy 2.38 The land use policies of this section serve to promote the development and location of retail and other commercial personal services which adhere to the General Plan’s principal goals. This entails providing locations for retail and service uses that will permit capture of a significant share of locally and regionally generated sales.

By approving a design review permit for the car dealership project, the City will be capturing local and regionally generated sales directly implementing General Plan Policy

2.38. PROPOSED SIGNAGE
Freeway signage for a commercial development is a key component of the overall marketing and viability of the site. The city needs to balance the economic development of the community with maintaining the character and vision of Marina. The proposed freeway -oriented commercial signage is intended to provide adequate visibility to passing motorists while remaining sensitive to the visual character of the surrounding community. Given the site’s proximity to the freeway, a certain degree of scale and prominenc e is necessary to ensure the sign functions effectively for wayfinding and business identification at highway speeds. However, the design has been carefully considered to balance this need with the City’s goal of preserving its clean, orderly, and visually cohesive environment. The sign’s height, proportions, materials, and illumination are designed to minimize visual clutter, avoid excessive brightness, and integrate with the broader architectural and landscape context. Through this approach, the project s eeks to achieve a functional level of visibility without detracting from the community’s valued aesthetic quality and overall sense of place.

The project has several sign requirements including but not limited to: Dunes Master Sign Program, the Highway 1 Design Guidelines adopted by the City of Marina and the Fort Ord Reuse Authority, and the Zoning Code. Under the Marina Zoning Code, highway signs require approval by the Planning Commission.7 The Dunes Master Sign Program originally had limited signage for

7 See MMC 17.46.170.F. Highway Signs. Commercially zoned properties having frontage on Highway 1 are declared to be sites of special significance and all signs and signing programs shall be approved by the planning commission.

In considering a sign or signing program for a site of special significance, the following items shall be considered: the 5 ATTACHMENT
15 this property because the designation for the property envisioned office development, not the current commercial project. However, the Dunes Master Sign Program 8 envisions that signage that substantially deviates from the approved MSP would require Planning Commission review:

SUBSTITUTIONS/ VARIANCES Requests to establish signs that are not in substantial conformance and vary from the provisions of these sign criteria shall be submitted for Design Review Board and Planning Commission consideration.9

Considering this requirement, Condition of Approval #27 (see below) provides that, prior to occupying the building, the applicant shall submit a Master Sign Program (MSP) for review and approval by the Planning Commission. In this manner, the applicant can potentially proceed with building permit review while city staff works on the exact details of the permanent signage allowed on site.

In addition to the building signage, a s part of the Incentive Package the applicant has agreed to build and maintain a monument sign in perpetuity along the southerly border of the property facing Highway 1. Table 2 shows the conceptual drawing for this signage.

COA #27- a. Master Sign Program. Prior to the occupancy of the buildings on site, the applicant will submit a master sign program for review and approval by the Planning Commission. Separate from the Master Sign Program, per the Incentive Package, prior to occupying the building the City Council shall retain design approval for the monument sign on the westerly border of the property.

Table 2-Conceptual Car Dealership Signage

signing needs of the proposed use; the location of the site in relation to the freeway access; and the responsibility of the city to protect and preserve the natural beauty of Highway 1 while balancing the city’s need for a healthy highway- oriented visitor-serving industry. Any decision of the planning commission concerning a site of special significance may be appealed to the city council, in writing, within ten days of the decision of the planning commission. 8 See Dunes at Monterey Bay (University Villages) Master Sign Program at :
https://cityofmarina.org/DocumentCenter/View/12853.
9 See Dunes at Monterey Bay Master Sign Program. Sign Submittal Requirements, Page 32:
https://cityofmarina.org/DocumentCenter/View/12853 .
6 ATTACHMENT
16 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT BACKGROUND
On March 7, 2025, an application was filed to remove trees within Phase 3 of the Dunes Development. The trees in question are located along the outer boundary of Opportunity Area 3.2 of the Dunes Development, with a few trees in Opportunity Areas 4.2 and 4.3. See Figure 1, below.

On April 30, 2025 , the Tree Committee visited the property identified as Opportunity Area 3.2 , generally located at the northwest corner of First Avenue and Divarty Street. The focus of the site visit was to educate the Committee on Opportunity Area 3.2 as well as to be briefed by the applicant, Marina Community Partners (MCP) , on how the tree removal permit aligns with the overall grading plan for Phase 3 of the Dunes Development. The Committee received public testimony and considered the merits of the project.

During production of the Tree Committee staff report , Vice Chair Greg Simmons of the Tree Committee inquired if trees #712, #741, and #752 could be saved. After the conclusion of the April 30, 2025 meeting, the Vice Chair also inquired if tree #743 could be saved. After speaking with the engineer of record (Andy Hunter) and the project arborist (Patrick Krabacher), it does not seem viable to save tree #743. There will be seven feet of fill installed where the tree sits, and the tree would likely not survive the grading operations as the root zone would be too damaged.

At the conclusion of the site visit the item was continued to the May 15, 2025 Tree Committee meeting. On May 15, 2025, the Tree Committee made a recommendation to the Planning Commission to approve the removal of approximately fifty-two trees within Phase 3 of the Dunes, including Opportunity Area 4.3 (Future Medical Use) and Opportunity Area 3.2 (Future Car Dealership Site), with Conditions of Approval that trees #712 and #752 be retained if feasible and, if not, that the applicant would document the reasons for removal to the Community Development Director. Additionally, the applicant was encouraged to plant more native species for the car dealership site.

Figure 1-Aerial Summary of Tree Removal Permit

After the May 15, 2025 Tree Committee meeting, on May 28, 2025, Marina Community Partners submitted a letter requesting that the City expedite the removal of some trees on the Medical Use site (Opportunity Area 4.3) so that grading work could be completed in an expeditious manner.

Specifically, Shea requested that the tree removal permit be bifurcated into two key components:
the first step would be to remove the trees from the Medical Use site , and the second step to temporarily stockpile the dirt associated with the proposed tree removals onto the Car Dealership property, Opportunity Area 3.2. The stockpiling of the dirt is depicted in Figure 2 below.

Medical Use
Car
Dealership
7 ATTACHMENT
17 Figure 2-Car Dealership Site-Stockpile of dirt.

On June 12, 2025 the Planning Commission adopted resolution 2025-08 supporting this two-step process for the future Medical Use site to be graded and the temporary stockpiling of dirt on the Car Dealership site, Opportunity Area 3.2.

TREE REMOVAL SITE PLAN ANALYSIS
The public testimony received on April 30, 2025 from the engineer of record (Andy Hunter) and the project arborist (Patrick Krabacher) indicated that the additional 5-11 feet of fill to be added to the site makes the survival of many the trees on the site unlikely. The reason is the cut and fill of the dirt onto the lot necessities digging into the tree root system.

Grading on Opportunity Site 3.2 (Car Dealership site)
As set forth above, the Car Dealership site requires significant cuts and fill to be added to the property to make it level with First Avenue and the surrounding properties. Parts of the Car Dealership site have anywhere from seven to eleven-foot grade elevation change from the center of the property to First Avenue. See Figure 3, below. Currently, two large stockpiles of dirt are on the lot, which will be leveled as part of the overall mass grading of the site to make it level to First Avenue and the surrounding area.

8 ATTACHMENT
18 Figure 3 – Elevation Changes on Opportunity Site 3.2 (Car Dealership site)

City of Marina Municipal Code-Tree Permits
City of Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Section 17.62.030 requires a tree removal permit to remove, damage, or relocate, or cause to be removed, damaged, or relocated , any tree on any property within City limits, unless exempted by MMC Sections 17.62.040 or 17.62.050. MMC Section 17.62.030 also prohibits construction activities within the dripline of any tree, unless these activities are conducted in compliance with tree protection guidelines adopted by resolution of the planning commission.

MMC defines “tree” as any living woody perennial plant having a single stem of six (6) inches or more diameter at breast height (DBH; measured at 4.5 feet above ground) or a multi -stemmed plant having an aggregate diameter of ten inches or more measured at DBH, and any living woody perennial plant which was planted in accordance with requirements of an approved compensation plan or was planted as part of a landscaping plan approved by the City. MMC defines “Dripline” as the greater of the outermost edge of the tree’s canopy, or fifteen times DBH measured from the center point of the tree.

University Village Specific Plan UVSP Tree Standards
UVSP Tree Standards call for the preservation of as many healthy Monterey cypress trees and oak trees as practicable. In accordance with the UVSP Tree Standards, Monterey cypress trees and oak trees that are in good or fair condition must be protected duri ng construction and preserved wherever practicable. If relocation is possible, Monterey cypress and oak trees shall be removed by machinery, be immediately replanted at a new site, and be watered and fertilized. Existing healthy trees determined to be in good or fair condition that are removed shall be replaced on-site 9 ATTACHMENT
19 at a ratio of two (2) replacement trees for every one (1) removed (2:1). UVSP classifies tree health based on the following definitions:

• Good. Tree is healthy and vigorous as indicated by color of foliage and density, has no apparent
signs of insect, disease, structural defects or mechanical injury. Tree has good form and structure.
• Fair. Tree is in average condition and vigor for the area, but may show minor insect, disease, or
physiological problems. Trees rated as fair may be improved with correctional pruning. • Poor. Tree that is in a general state of decline and may show severe structural or mechanical
defects which may lead to failure, may have insect or disease damage, but is not dead. • Dead/Snag. Dead standing tree.

Tree Removal Details
DD&A identified 44 Monterey cypress ( Hesperocyparis macrocarpa ) trees within or directly adjacent to the project site. DD&A inventoried three (3) dead trees, 17 trees in poor health, and the remaining 24 in fair health with two for retention . A tree removal permit from the City is required to remove the 44 total trees, and tree replacement at a 2:1 ratio is required for removal of the 22 healthy trees. Therefore, the developer will replace the removal of healthy trees with up to 44 replacement plantings.

Tree Identified within Project Site 44
Dead Trees 44-3=41 remaining
Trees-Poor Health 41-17=24 remaining
Retaining two trees10 (Tree 732 and 730) 24-2=22 remaining City of Marina’s Tree Replacement Ratio
(2:1)
22X2=44 Trees To Be Replanted

Required Findings for Tree Removal Permit
Pursuant to MMC Section 17.62.060(C), the following findings, (i.e., any one of which is sufficient), are required prior to approval or conditional approval of a tree removal permit:

1. The tree is in poor condition and is in danger of falling within proximity to existing structures, high pedestrian traffic areas such as parking lots, playgrounds and pedestrian walkways, or interference with utility services that cannot be controlled or r emedied through reasonable preservation and/or preventive procedures and practices; or

2. The tree is host to a plant, or insect, or other parasitic organism which endangers other adjacent healthy trees; or

3. The location of more than three trees conflicts with the construction of street or sidewalk improvements, storm drain, traffic signals or signs; or

4. The number of trees on the site is in excess of the number of healthy trees the site is able to support, based on such considerations as tree species, growth characteristics, general health of the stand, tree age, solar orientation and soil condition; or

5. The applicant outlines other clearly documented and compelling reasons for the removal or relocation of a tree which do not include the elimination of falling leaves or shade, or improving a view; and

10 Tree 730 is just outside of the project area, but it will be retained. 10 ATTACHMENT
20 6. The tree does not serve as part of a windbreak system, or assist in drainage or in the avoidance of soil erosion, or serve as a component of a wildlife habitat, or otherwise play a prominent role in maintaining the existing urban forest; and

7. Due to the tree’s contribution to the aesthetic beauty of the area, the removal would not have a substantial detrimental effect on neighboring property values; and

8. If the removal request is concurrent with development plans for the property and the development plans indicate that it is necessary to remove or relocate the tree to enable reasonable and conforming use of the property which is otherwise prevented by the location of the tree.

Staff finds that findings are satisfied here. See Exhibit A, Findings of Fact. Mitigation is addressed through Conditions of Approval, see Exhibit B, requiring tree replacement at a 2:1 ratio for healthy trees removed, consistent with both MMC Section 17.62.060(D) and the UVSP Tree Standards described above.

TREE REMOVAL GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
General Plan Policy 2.74-Industrial and Commercial Services. Approximately 290 acres of land are reserved for industrial and commercial uses. Each of the designated areas has a distinctive role based on its respective locational characteristics. The intent is to accommodate a broad range of industrial and commercial-service activities within the City, thereby enhancing local opportunities for employment and economic development and providing for the service needs of other uses within the City.

By removing trees from Opportunity Area 3.2 and allowing commercial development on the property, General Plan Policy 2.74 will be implemented by the approval of this tree removal permit.

General Plan Policy 2.4.3 -Local-Serving Retail and Personal Services . At present, a major portion of Marina’s population purchases everyday items such as food, drugs, and other sundries outside the City. The result is both a loss of sales tax revenue in support of City services and the generation of a greater number of vehicular trips by residents. In general, vehicular trips would be decreased both in length and number if everyday goods and services were more available locally.

By removing trees from Opportunity Area 3.2 and making the property a viable commercial development, the tree removal permit will be implementing General Plan Policy 2.4.3.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Council members or Planning Commissioners are subject to the Political Reform Act. C ouncil Members or Planning Commissioners must not make, participate in making, or attempt to influence in any manner a governmental decision which they know, or should know, may have a material effect on a financial interest of a Council Member or Planning Commissioner.

EX PARTE COMMUNICATION DISCLOSURES
On quasi-judicial matters, City Councilmembers shall verbally disclose off the record contacts relating to the item, after the item is called and before C ity Council consideration of the matter.

Disclosure shall include the identity of an individual(s) with whom the C ity Council had contact, and the nature of the contact. Written ex parte communications must be forwarded to the Community Development Department so they can be provided to the entire Commission and to the public.

11 ATTACHMENT
21 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The City of Marina Planning Division has determined that this project will not result in new significant environmental impacts or effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects previously identified in EIR No. 2004091167, which was certified for the University Villages Specific Plan. See CEQA Guidelines § 15183; Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21083.3(b).

The Specific Plan and its associated EIR contemplated that “recreational vehicle” sales and/or rentals would be a use permitted by right at the project location; passenger vehicle sales at this location is consistent with the originally anticipated permitted use and would not result in any previously unidentified impacts. The Specific Plan and EIR also anticipated that “hundreds” of trees would be removed as a result of the overall project, requiring mitigation pursuant to the City’s tree removal ordinance and University Village Specific Plan tree replacement standards.

CONCLUSION
This staff report, resolution, and associated exhibits are submitted for City Council consideration.

Respectfully submitted,

Guido F. Persicone, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Marina

REVIEW/CONCUR

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A-Findings of Fact
Exhibit B-Project Conditions of Approval
Exhibit C-Site Plan
Exhibit D-Project Narrative
Exhibit E-Arborist Reports
April 18, 2025
May 12, 2025
February 2026
Exhibit F-Project Comment Letters
Exhibit G-Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement (with City Council Resolutions 2025-49, 2025-83, and 2026-45)

12 ATTACHMENT
22 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTIN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA APPROVING

A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT AND A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT FOR A NEW MERCEDES-BENZ CAR DEALERSHIP AT OPPORTUNITY AREA 3.2 OF THE DUNES DEVELOPMENT (2101 FIRST AVENUE) AND FIND THIS ACTION WAS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED IN EIR NO. 2004091167, CERTIFIED FOR THE UNIVERSITY VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN.

WHEREAS, per a Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement approved by Council on May 20, 2025 (“Incentive Agreement ”) the applicant , Unstoppable Automotive MBMCA, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Mercedes -Benz of Monterey (“Unstoppable Group”), and the City have agreed per Council Resolutions 2025-49, 2025-83, and 2026-45, that the City Council retains final decision -making authority over the Design Review and Tree Removal Permits for this project; and

WHEREAS, on April 30, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing held on the property located at the northwest corner of First Avenue and Divarty Street, the Tree Committee of the City of Marina considered a tree removal permit request to remove trees within Phase 3 of the Dunes Development and specifically within Opportunity Areas 3.2, 4.2 , and 4.3 of the University Villages Specific Plan; and

WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the April 30, 2025, meeting the item was continued for further review to the May 15, 2025 Tree Committee meeting; and

WHEREAS removal of 44 trees is necessary to accommodate the completion of the Dunes Development Project (formerly the University Village Specific Plan); and

WHEREAS, by removing trees from the site and making it a viable commercial property, the tree removal permit will be implementing the 2000 General Plan via policies 2.74 and 2.4.3; and

WHEREAS, removal of trees is subject to a Tree Removal Permit and requires review by the Tree Committee for a recommendation to the Planning Commission per Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Sec. 17.62.060.B; and

WHEREAS, at the conclusion of May 15, 2025, Tree Committee meeting , a favorable recommendation was made to the Planning Commission; and

WHEREAS, the applicant shall replace all qualifying trees at a 2:1 ratio per MMC section

17.62.060.D.2 based upon the combined diameter at breast height (DBH) of the healthy trees to be removed; and

WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing the Planning Commission recommended approval of the design review and tree removal permits to the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the proposed automobile dealership project is consistent with the City’s Design Review criteria and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare as set forth in the Staff Report and Findings of Fact; and

WHEREAS, the project has been designed to support attractive and functional commercial use while maintaining compatibility with the character of the City of Marina and the surrounding area; and
13 ATTACHMENT
23 Resolution No. 2026-
Page Two

WHEREAS, the City of Marina is a lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project will not result in new significant environmental impacts or effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects previously identified in EIR No. 2004091167, which was certified for the University Villages Specific Plan. See CEQA Guidelines § 15183; Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21083.3(b). The Specific Plan and its associated EIR contemplated that “recreational vehicle” sales and/or rentals would be a use permitted by right at the project location; passenger vehicle sales at this location is consistent with the originally anticipated permitted use and would not result in any previously unidentified impacts. The Specific Plan and EIR also anticipated that “hundreds” of trees would be removed as a result of the overall project, requiring mitigation pursuant to the City’s tree removal ordinance and University Village Specific Plan tree replacement standards.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council , based on Findings of Fact , Conditions of Approval, and the CEQA determination referenced hereto, does hereby:

1. Find that any environmental impacts from the recommended action have been previously reviewed in the environmental impact report for the University Village Specific Plan EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167).

2. Incorporate by reference the recitals listed above , the staff report accompanying this resolution, the Findings of Fact and the project revised Conditions of Approval as presented by City staff at May 19, 2026 City Council meeting. (Exhibits A and B to this Resolution).

3. Approve a Design Review Permit for a new car dealership on the property located at 2101 First Avenue (Opportunity Area 3.2 of the Dunes Development).

4. Approve the removal of forty-four (44) trees subject to Chapter 17.62 of the Marina Municipal Code and the University Villages Specific Plan tree replacement standards.

5. Direct the applicant ( Unstoppable Group) to replant replacement trees at a 2:1 ratio for every tree that is removed that are in fair or good condition which include twenty-two (22) trees.

6. Require the applicant (Unstoppable Group) to comply with the Conditions of Approval and the recommendation from the arborist reports submitted by Denise Duffy and Associates on April 18, 2025, May 12, 2025, and February 2026, incorporated by reference into this resolution.

7. Require the applicant (Unstoppable Group) to retain trees #712 and #752 to the extent feasible. If said trees cannot be retained the applicant shall submit documentation for review by the Community Development Director as to why removal is required.

8. Require the applicant (Unstoppable Group) to comply with the Incentive Agreement conditions of approval per City Council Resolutions 2025-49, 2025-83, 2026-45.

9. Require the applicant to file a Master Sign Program (MSP) for the project for Planning Commission consideration and approval prior to occupying the building.

10. To require the applicant to receive City Council approval for the monument sign along the westerly border of the property prior to occupying the building.

11. Direct staff to prepare and submit a Notice of Exemption (NOE) to the County Clerk within five days of approval by the City Council.

14 ATTACHMENT
24 Resolution No. 2026-
Page Three
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a duly noticed special on the 19th day of May 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBER:
_________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
15 ATTACHMENT
25 EXHIBIT A
Findings of Fact
Tree Removal Permit
MMC 17.62.060.C. Required Findings for Approval of Tree Removal Permit. The required finding is in standard font with Staff’s response following in italics.

1. The tree is in poor condition and is in danger of falling within proximity to existing structures, high pedestrian traffic areas such as parking lots, playgrounds and pedestrian walkways, or interference with utility services that cannot be controlled or remedied through reasonable preservation and/or preventive procedures and practices; or A qualified arborist assessed the 44 trees proposed for removal and found the majority to be in fair condition. When final grading plans are prepared, it may be possible to retain trees that are not needed for construction. In this event, these trees will be retained and protected. [Note that the Tree Committee is not required to make this finding because the Committee can instead make findings 5-8; see MCC § 17.62.060C.]

2. The tree is host to a plant, or insect, or other parasitic organism which endangers other adjacent healthy trees; or
A qualified arborist assessed the 44 trees proposed for removal and found the majority to be in fair condition. [Note that the Tree Committee is not required to make this finding because the Committee can instead make findings 5-8; see MCC § 17.62.060C.]

3. The location of more than three (3) trees conflicts with the construction of street or sidewalk improvements, storm drain, traffic signals or signs; or The location of multiple trees proposed for removal would interfere with the proposed infrastructure improvements and the development of Opportunity Area 3.2 with an additional five to seven feet of fill for a commercial development, as documented on the Site Plan and in the Arborist Report.

4. The number of trees on the site is in excess of the number of healthy trees the site is able to support, based on such considerations as tree species, growth characteristics, general health of the stand, tree age, solar orientation and soil condition; or A qualified arborist assessed the health of individual trees within the project area but did not offer an opinion on the number of healthy trees the site is able to support. [Note that the Tree Committee is not required to make this finding because the Committee can instead make findings 5-8; see MCC § 17.62.060C.]

5. The applicant outlines other clearly documented and compelling reasons for the removal or relocation of a tree which do not include the elimination of falling leaves or shade, or improving a view; and
16 26
All forty-four trees proposed for removal, including the three trees are dead and seventeen are in poor health directly impede the grading and construction of the site for commercial development.

6. The tree does not serve as part of a windbreak system, or assist in drainage or in the avoidance of soil erosion, or serve as a component of a wildlife habitat, or otherwise play a prominent role in maintaining the existing urban forest; and Most of the trees proposed for removal were found by an arborist to be in fair condition. The trees do not serve as part of a windbreak system. Mitigation measures described in the Arborist Report and in the Conditions of Approval above will reduce impacts of tree removal related to drainage, soil erosion, and wildlife habitat. Qualifying trees will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio ensuring preservation of the City’s urban forest.

7. Due to the tree’s contribution to the aesthetic beauty of the area, the removal would not have a substantial detrimental effect on neighboring property values; and Although aesthetic judgements are subjective, the City has established a process for designating aesthetically significant trees as landmark trees (MMC Section 17.62.070). None of the trees proposed for removal have been designated as a landmark tree. Because the majority of the trees are located within an existing transportation corridor and more than 200 feet away from residential properties, removal of the trees is unlikely to have a substantial detrimental effect on neighboring property values.

8. If the removal request is concurrent with development plans for the property and the development plans indicate that it is necessary to remove or relocate the tree to enable reasonable and conforming use of the property which is otherwise prevented by the location of the tree.

The applicant made an effort to protect as many trees within the project area as possible, reducing the number of trees proposed for removal to 44. To accommodate the required infrastructure, 44 trees must be removed. Qualifying trees will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio or an in-lieu fee provided consistent with the requirements of MMC Section 17.62.060.

Design Review Findings
The review authority shall consider all necessary plans, drawings and statements in an endeavor to encourage buildings, structures, or other improvements to be designed and constructed, and so located, that they will not be unsightly, undesirable or obnoxi ous in appearance to the extent that they will hinder the orderly and harmonious development of the city, impair the desirability of residence or investment or occupation in the city, limit the opportunity to obtain the optimum use and value of the land and improvements, impair the desirability of living conditions on or adjacent to the subject site, conform with the standards included in the local coastal land use plan and/or otherwise adversely affect the general welfare of the community.

The proposed automobile dealership project is consistent with the City’ s Design Review criteria and will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare. The project has been 17 27
designed to support attractive and functional commercial use while maintaining compatibility with the character of the City of Marina and the surrounding area. The site layout provides clear and efficient vehicular circulation, including customer access, vehicle display areas, and serv ice operations, while minimizing potential conflicts with pedestrian movement.

The architectural design incorporates contemporary forms, high -quality materials, and careful modulation of building mass to reduce visual bulk and create a cohesive and visually appealing development. Vehicle display areas, lighting, and signage have been thoughtfully integrated into the overall design to ensure visibility appropriate for a dealership use while avoiding excessive visual clutter or glare that could impact adjacent properties or public rights-of-way.

Landscaping has been incorporated along street frontages and throughout the site to soften the appearance of vehicle display areas, enhance the streetscape, and contribute to the City’ s coastal aesthetic. The project’ s lighting plan is designed to provide adequate illumination for safety and security while minimizing light spillover onto adjacent properties. All improvements are conditioned to comply with applicable City standards and design guidelines.

Based on the foregoing, the project achieves a high -quality design that is compatible with its surroundings and consistent with the intent of the City’ s Design Review requirements. Therefore, the findings to approve the Design Review Permit can be made.

California Environmental Quality Act Findings
Staff has assessed the proposed project in relation to the University Village Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the University Village Specific Plan and recommend that the Planning Commission and City Council determine that no further environmental review is required pursuant to Section 15162 (“Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations”) of the CEQA Guidelines.

The proposed automobile dealership project has been reviewed for consistency with the environmental analysis conducted in the certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the University Village Specific Plan. The project site is located within the bound aries of the Specific Plan area and is consistent with the development assumptions, and intensity of development evaluated in the EIR. See CEQA Guidelines § 15183; Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21083.3(b).

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168, the City has determined that the proposed project would not result in any new significant environmental impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant imp acts beyond those analyzed in the Specific Plan EIR. The project does not introduce new environmental effects or incorporate changes that would require major revisions to the prior environmental document.

All applicable mitigation measures identified in the University Village Specific Plan EIR that are relevant to the proposed development will be applied to the project through conditions of approval, as appropriate. Therefore, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required, and 18 28
the certified EIR for the University Village Specific Plan adequately addresses the environmental effects of the proposed project. Based on the foregoing, the City finds that the proposed project is within the scope of the previously certified EIR, and no additional environmental analysis is required under CEQA.

2049699.1
19 29
1 EXHIBIT B
Car Dealership Conditions of Approval
Conditions modified by the Planning Commission on April 23, 206 are underlined or have strikethroughs. Recommended conditions modified by city staff after the Planning Commission hearing are in yellow, subject to City Council approval.

The recitals from the project resolution are incorporated by reference into the attached conditions of approval.

1. Approved Use. The permittee shall execute, construct, and operate the project in accordance with the approved application materials and plans dated February 27, 2026, as amended by the following conditions of approval. Any deviation from approvals must be reviewed and approved by staff and may require separate approval from the approving authority and/or further environmental review.

2. Effective Date, Expiration, and Extensions. This approval shall become effective immediately, except when an appeal period applies pursuant to Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Chapter 17.70, in which case actions shall become effective ten (10) days after the approval date provided that no appeal is filed. Approval shall expire two years from the Approval date, or from the date of the final decision in the event of an appeal, unless within such period a complete building permit application has been filed with the Community Development Department, or the authorized activities have commenced in the case of a permit not involving construction. Upon written request and payment of appropriate fees submitted no later than the expiration date of this Approval, the Community Development Director or designee may grant a one-year extension of this date, with additional extensions subject to approval by the approving body. Expiration of any necessary building permit or other construction-related permit for this project may invalidate this Approval if said Approval has also expired. If litigation is filed challenging this Approval or its implementation, then the time period stated above for obtaining necessary permits for construction and/or commencement of authorized activities is automatically extended for the duration of the litigation.

3. Compliance with Other Requirements. The permittee shall comply with all other applicable federal, state, regional, and local laws, codes, requirements, regulations, and guidelines. Compliance with other applicable requirements may require changes to the approved use and/or plans. These changes shall be processed in accordance with the procedures contained in Condition #4.

4. Compliance with Specific Plan. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the University Village Specific Plan. All applicable University Village Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Mitigation and Monitoring Program (MMRP) conditions shall be applicable and enforceable upon this project.

5. Modifications. Any modification to the approved project, site plan, conditions of approval, or use requires consistency review and approval by Community Development

CORRECT EXHIBIT B
2 Director. Major revisions may require review and approval by the original approving body.

6. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. The permittee shall be responsible for compliance with all Conditions of Approval. The City reserves the right at any time during construction to require certification by a licensed professional at the permittee’s expense that the as-built project conforms to all applicable requirements. Violation of any term, project description, or Condition of Approval is unlawful and prohibited. In the case of noncompliance with the requirements of a Use Permit, Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Section 17.58.060 allows for the revocation of said permit. The City reserves the right to initiate civil and/or criminal enforcement and/or abatement proceedings where violations are present, consistent with MMC Chapters 1.08, 1.10 and 1.12.

7. Revocation. Where one or more project Conditions of Approval are not met, or where a project was approved on the basis of false material information given willfully, intentionally or negligently by the permittee, the appropriate authority may revoke or modify the approval for the project.

8. Indemnification. To the extent allowable by law, the permittee agrees to hold the City harmless from costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of the City in connection with the City’s defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any state or federal court challenging the City’s actions with respect to the project. The permittee understands and acknowledges that the City is under no obligation to defend any legal actions challenging the City’s actions with respect to the project.

9. Record Retention. The permittee shall retain full and complete copies of all permits and other regulatory approvals issued in connection with the project, including but not limited to conditions of approval, approved plans, and resolutions. In the event the City cannot locate full and complete permits or other regulatory approvals in its official records, and the permittee fails to retain full and complete permits or other regulatory approvals, any ambiguities or uncertainties that would be resolved through an examination of the missing documents will be conclusively resolved against the permittee.

10. Violation of Code. Any person who does any work or uses, occupies or maintains any building or structure, or causes the same to be done, or does any grading, contrary to or in violation of Title 15, Buildings and Construction, or of any of the uniform codes adopted by Title 15 is guilty of an infraction pursuant to Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Section

15.04.060.

11. Grading Permit. Grading work disturbing at least 50 cubic yards or 2,500 square feet of a property within the City requires a grading permit meeting all requirements of Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Section 8.46.130 regarding stormwater retention. The permittee shall secure a grading permit before beginning grading work.

3 12. Notice of Exemption. That within five (5) days from the date of action upon the permit of this project by City Council the applicant shall submit to Planning staff a check payable to the “Monterey County Clerk” in the amount of $50.00 to pay for the fee for filing the notice of exemption.

13. Landscape Maintenance. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a bond or other surety acceptable to the City to guarantee that the installed landscaping shall remain in a healthy and growing condition for a minimum of two years from the date of occupancy approval. The amount of the surety shall be a minimum of ten percent of the actual or estimated costs of the installation accepted by the Planning Services Division. An amount greater than ten percent may be required by the Planning Services Division if more exotic, less reliable plant material is specified in the approved planting plan. Two years after the approval of occupancy, the applicant shall contact the Planning Services Division to arrange for an inspection of the landscaping. If or when all landscaping shown on the approved plans is in place and is healthy and growing condition, the surety shall be returned to the entity that provided the surety or to another entity upon proof of transfer. If plant material is dead, dying or missing and the applicant does not take steps to restore the landscaping, the City shall have the authority to use the surety for the restoration of the landscaping.

14. Site Maintenance. The project site shall be kept in a nuisance-free condition, and healthy and well-kept landscaping shall be continuously maintained. Any existing blight or nuisance shall be abated within seventy-two hours of receiving a notice from the City of Marina.

15. Monterey Bay Air Resources District (Permit). Prior to issuance of construction permit(s), the Owner/Applicant shall submit evidence to the Building Division, that the appropriate permits have been obtained from Monterey Bay Air Resources District.

16. Monterey Bay Air Resources District (BMPs). The Owner/Applicant shall utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs) for fugitive dust control measures. Best Management Practices (BMPs) notes shall be included on all building and/or grading permits for construction activities that may result in soil/ground disturbance

17. Bicycle Facilities. Prior to the issuance of building permits the site plan shall be modified to show the placement of one bike rack per Section 5.7 of the University Village Specific Plan. Prior to occupancy, the bike rack shall be installed.

18. Trash Enclosures and Maintenance Building. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant submit shall coordinate with the waste hauler for the site and submit proof that adequate service will be accommodated/contracted for the project site. The applicant shall demonstrate the service provider approves of the size and final location of the trash enclosure.

4 19. Environmental Health Clearance. Prior to the issuance of building permits, clearance from the Monterey County Department of Environmental Health shall be obtained and provided to the Community Development Department.

20. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 3, Chapter 3.26 of the Marina Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee.

21. Parking Plan. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall provide a parking plan that denotes customer and employee parking. Additionally, the applicant shall submit revised construction drawings that identify the right of way in front of the project as “green curbed” or for short term limited parking of no more than twenty-thirty (20-30) minutes.

22. Silent Paging System. Due to the project location adjacent to residential neighborhoods a silent paging system throughout the project site shall be implemented. No loudspeakers shall be used as part of daily business operations.

23. Construction Noise. Unless otherwise authorized, construction activities shall be conducted in compliance with Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Section 15.04.055 and all non-emergency construction or repair work shall be limited to the following schedule:

Monday through Saturday: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.

Sunday and holidays: 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. (For the purposes of this section, “holidays” shall include New Year’s Day, July 4th, Thanksgiving and Christmas) During daylight savings time, the hours of construction may be extended to 8 p.m.

No construction, tools, or equipment shall produce a decibel level of more than sixty (60) decibels for twenty-five (25) percent of an hour at any receiving property line.

24. Operational Noise. Noise levels from the project site after completion of the project (i.e., during project operation) shall comply with the performance standards of Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Chapter 9.24. If noise levels exceed these standards, the activity causing the noise shall be abated until appropriate noise reduction measures have been installed and compliance verified by the City

25. Lighting. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall be required to submit a detailed lighting plan to ensure dark sky principles are incorporated into the final design of the building and light pollution does not occur. Exterior lighting fixtures shall be adequately shielded to a point below the light bulb and reflector prevent unnecessary glare onto adjacent properties. After installation, the Community Development Director or designee shall retain the right to require reduction in the intensity of illumination or change of light color if said illumination creates any undue public nuisance. The following shall be shown within the construction drawings:

25. Lighting. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall be required to submit a detailed lighting plan to ensure dark sky principles are incorporated into the final design of the building and project. The comprehensive exterior lighting plan shall be 5 submitted for review and approval to the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director may request that the Planning Commission review and approve said lighting plan consistent with the procedure set forth in Section 17.55.040 (Review Process) where sufficient public concern warrants a public hearing. The plan shall include fixture specifications, mounting heights, photometric data, shielding details, color temperature, and illumination levels throughout the site. Additionally, e xterior lighting fixtures shall be adequate ly shielded to a point below the light bulb and reflector prevent unnecessary glare onto adjacent properties. Based on input from the City Council at May 19 and June 2, 2026, additional lighting requirements to the extent feasible, shall be incorporated into the final lighting plan . After installation, the Community Development Director or designee shall retain the right to require reduction in the intensity of illumination or change of light color if said illumination creates any undue public nuisance or is not consistent with applicable mitigation measures for the University Villages Specific Plan (now Dunes) EIR.

The following shall be shown within the construction drawings:

a. The project shall provide step -down lighting as the project is adjacent to residential neighborhoods. The step-down lighting shall occur each evening between the following intervals: 6:00 P.M., 7:30 P.M, and 10:30 P.M. The applicant shall be required to provide a photometric study of light output prior to 10PM and after 10PM. The lighting level shall be the minimum to maintain security and safety for the property at no more than a two (2) light candles average for the pr operty. The lighting plan shall be evaluated for compliance with Lighting Zone 2 (LZ 2)1 standards, rather than LZ3 for car dealerships. b. In addition to the fixed clock-time step-downs, all non-security lighting shall be reduced to security-level only during the period commencing two hours after sunset and ending two hours before sunrise, consistent with MM AE-3.1.
c. Site lighting systems and showroom lighting shall be grouped into control zones to allow for open, closing, and night light/security lighting schemes. All control groups shall be controlled by an automatic lighting control system utilizing a time clock, p hotocell, and low voltage relays.

d. Full Cut-Off Fixtures-All exterior lighting fixtures shall utilize full cut-off or fully shielded luminaires designed and installed to prevent glare, spillover, and light trespass onto adjacent properties and public rights-of-way consistent with Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) standards.
e. Maximum Fixture Height-Freestanding parking lot and vehicle display lighting fixtures shall not exceed twenty-two (22) feet in height.
f. Color Temperature-General site and parking lot lighting shall maintain a correlated color temperature (CCT) of no greater than 3000 Kelvin to minimize glare and nighttime light pollution.

1 The International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) and the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) have developed the Model Lighting Ordinance (MLO) to address the need for strong, consistent outdoor lighting regulation. The MLO User’s Guide explicitly classifies car dealerships under LZ3 (moderately high ambient lighting), not LZ2. Here, however, Staff is proposing LZ2 for the Project. The MLO User’s Guide describes LZ2 as: “light commercial business districts and high density or mixed use residential districts. Includes neighborhood business districts; churches, schools and neighborhood recreation facilities; and light industrial zoning with modest nighttime uses or lighting requirements.”
6 g. Light Trespass Prohibited-All exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining residential properties and streets. Lighting shall be arranged and shielded to prevent direct illumination, glare, or spillover onto adjacent parcels or public rights-of-way with an average foot candle of .5 and a maximum of 1.0 foot candles.
h. Lighting shall also be designed to prevent direct illumination, glare, or spillover onto Fort Ord Dunes State Park across Highway 1, consistent with Mitigation Measures AE-

3.1 and BR-7.1 of the University Village EIR. The Photometric and Lighting Plan shall demonstrate that vertical illuminance at the western project boundary does not exceed

0.1 foot-candles, calculated to a height of 33 feet above the tallest luminaire. i. Photometric Standards-The applicant shall provide a photometric plan demonstrating that lighting levels are adequate for vehicle display and public safety while maintaining a uniform and subdued lighting pattern. Average illumination levels shall be minimized to the greatest extent feasible and avoid excessive brightness associated with automobile display lighting with a average foot candles of .5 and a maximum of 1.0. j. Automatic Controls-All exterior lighting shall be controlled by automatic timers and/or photocells. Non-security lighting, including vehicle display lighting, shall be reduced or turned off after business hours, except for the minimum lighting necessary for site security and safety.
k. Building-Mounted Lighting-Building-mounted lighting fixtures shall be attached only to walls or eaves and shall not project above the roofline or parapet. All lighting shall have full cutoff.
l. Consistency with City Standards-All lighting improvements shall comply with the applicable provisions of the City of Marina University Village Environmental Impact Report, the University Village Specific Plan, the 2002 Design Guidelines and Standards, Title 24 energy regulations, and all applicable municipal code requirements.

a. The project shall provide step-down lighting as the project is adjacent to residential neighborhoods. The step-down lighting shall occur each evening between the following intervals: 6:00 P.M., 7:30 P.M, and 10:30 P.M. b. Site lighting systems and showroom lighting shall be grouped into control zones to allow for open, closing, and night light/security lighting schemes. All control groups shall be controlled by an automatic lighting control system utilizing a time clock, photocell, and low voltage relays.

26. Hours of Operation. The car dealership will be operational Monday-Friday (830AM- 7PM); Saturday 830AM-6PM; Sunday 10AM-6PM. Monday-Friday 8AM-9PM; Saturday 830AM-8PM; Sunday 10AM-7PM. The service stations will be operational M-F 8AM-530PM; Saturday 8AM-2PM Monday-Friday 7AM-7PM; Saturday 8AM-4PM; Sunday-Closed. The service stations will be closed on Sundays. Significant modifications to the hours of operation will be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director.

27. Signage
a. Master Sign Program. Prior to the occupancy of the buildings on site, the applicant will submit a master sign program for review and approval by the Planning Commission. 7 Separate from the Master Sign Program, per the Incentive Package, prior to occupying the building the City Council shall retain design approval for the monument sign on the westerly border of the property.
b. Illumination. The Community Development Director or designee shall retain the right to require reduction in the intensity of any illumination that creates undue public nuisance.
c. Maintenance of Signs. Signs shall be installed, maintained, and removal of signs shall be regulated in accordance with Marina Municipal Code (MMC) Chapter 17.46 including, but not limited to, the abatement of abandoned signs and the enforcement of violating signs.
d. The Dunes Master Sign Program will be incorporated by reference into the Mercedes- Benz Master Sign Program and will expressly prohibit balloons, inflatable signs, banners and other unsightly signage.

28. Incentive Package Conditions of Approval (City Council Resolutions 2025-49, 2025-83, and 2026-45)

City Council Resolution 2025-49
a. The City Council shall have final approval after review from the Tree Committee and the Planning Commission for Site Plan and Architectural Design Review; b. That the dealership produces an accurate computer simulation video prior to Planning Commission review;
c. That any gateway sign be consistent with City monument design requirements and that any dealership signage refer to “Mercedes of Marina”; d. That the proposed lighting for the dealership site minimizes impact to the night sky; e. To consider future specific agreement amendments subject to mutual agreement by City and Developer; and
f. Implement preference for local hires when feasible.

City Council Resolution 2025-83

1. Approve amending the sales tax revenue sharing agreement between the City of Marina and Unstoppable Automotive MBMCA LLC to change the dealership name from Mercedes-Benz of Marina to Mercedes-Benz of Monterey

2. Clarification on the Gateway Sign:
a. Consistent with city monument design requirements to say “City of Marina”; b. Designed, constructed and maintenance to be paid for by developer; and c. To exist in perpetuity.

3. That the two parties discuss revenue sharing/contribution by developer to City at some future point in time, like the 10-year or 15-year mark, once Mercedes-Benz is established and doing well.

4. All other conditions of approval of May 20, 2025, to remain the same.

5. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement subject to final review by the City Attorney, and:
8 6. Authorize the Finance Director to make the necessary budgetary and accounting entries.

29. Encroachment Permit. Any improvements or staging within the City Right -of-Way will require an Encroachment Permit and a Public Improvement Agreement with the City.

Improvements in the right-of-way shall conform to the City Standard Details and the Dunes Specific Plan with Tentative Map Conditions (as amended).

30. Traffic Control Plan. If temporary closure of the public right -of-way is required for construction and/or staging, the permittee shall receive an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department, which includes a Traffic Control Plan to be approved by the City Engineer.

31. Road, Sidewalk, and Landscape Condition. All affected roads, sidewalks, and landscaped areas shall be restored to original or better condition following completion of work in the right(s)-of-way.

32. Grading Permit. Due to the scope of the project, a Grading Permit will be required. Provide the following for the Permit Plan Review submittal:
a. Preliminary Title Report not more than 6 months old. b. Hydrology Report for the proposed on-site drainage system. c. Show all proposed spot elevations showing positive drainage away from all proposed structures and property lines. Hillsides shall be graded (e.g. drainage swales) to capture runoff before reaching the City right -of-way or adjacent properties.
d. Show the sediment capture/pre -treatment features (for parking lots) and retention systems for capturing on -site runoff with pipe sizing and invert elevations. If driveways are sloped towards the City right -of-way, show a driveway catchment system preventing runoff from leaving the property.

33. Lighting Plan. A Photometric & Lighting Plan shall be submitted to the Public Works and Community Development Departments for review and approval prior to issuance of the Grading building permit. Special consideration shall be given to the project’s close proximity to residential development and Highway 1. See Condition of Approval #25 for additional lighting details requested on the lighting plan.

34. Off Site Improvements. For any offsite improvements not within the City’s right -of-way, the applicant shall obtain the necessary approvals from the Property Owner or Public Agency (e.g. Caltrans) prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 9 35. MCWD Approval. The applicant shall coordinate with the adjacent Developer (Shea Homes) and the special water district (Marina Coast Water District) for approval of the project’s proposed sewer and water improvements.

36. Phase 3 Grading Plans. Proposed site grading shall conform to the previously approved Dune’s Phase 3 South opportunity site grading plans.

37. Spot Elevations. Upon submittal of grading/Site Plan additional Spot elevations will be necessary. These locations include all curb returns at parking islands, grade breaks at curbs, and defined flow lines in the paving. Exterior spot elevations may be necessary.

38. Geotechnical Review. A geotechnical soils investigation will be required to determine the infiltration rates and pavement sections as well as all standard structural requirements for a project of this size.

39. Delivery Routes. A Delivery Route shall be established in the plan set with turning templates for along City streets. This route shall follow existing collector and arterial roadways (e.g. 2nd Ave, Divarty St) and avoid residential roads (e.g. 3rd St).

40. Landscaping Plans. The preliminary landscape plans submitted on April 2, 2026 show trees are not planted over various existing Utility Easements along 1 st Ave. Consult with the owner of the facility to determine if trees will be acceptable within the easements.

41. Drainage. On site drainage to be designed to infiltrate 100-year storm events through water quality treatment systems. The system shall comply with City Standards (MMC Chapter

8.46) and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) with its requirements.

42. Green Curb Parking Study. Due to proximity to adjacent Residential and Commercial developments, parking along 1st Avenue shall be restricted per Marina Municipal Code section 10.44 to 20-30 minutes min/hrs between the hours of 9am and 6pm on any day (except for Sundays and Holidays). Within one (1) year of operation of the business, the applicant shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City so a third-party vendor can prepare a parking study to ascertain the true parking patterns at the business. The Public Works Director shall have the authority to modify the right of way parking based on said parking study.

43. Fire Prevention. The Marina Fire Department, under the authority of the Fire Chief or his/her designee, has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with applicable fire and life safety regulations. Approval of this project is contingent upon full compliance with the 2025 California Fire Code (CFC), and all locally adopted amendments as enforced by the City of Marina and Monterey County. The applicant is hereby notified that all fire protection systems, site improvements, and life safety features shall be installed, tested, and approved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in delays in project approval, withholding of the Certificate of Occupancy, or enforcement action as permitted by law. All fire protection

Page 12 of 17 ends
← All documents from this meeting