Agenda — Marina City Council, June 16, 2026

AGENDA

Tuesday, June 16, 2026 5:00 P.M. Closed Session
6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR

AGENCY OF THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).

Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California

AND

Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556

PARTICIPATION
You may participate in the City Council meeting in person or in real-time by calling Zoom Meeting via the weblink and phone number provided at the top of this agenda. Instructions on how to access, view and participate in remote meetings are provided by visiting the City’s home page at https://cityofmarina.org/. Attendees can make oral comments during the meeting by using the “Raise Your Hand” feature in the webinar or by pressing *9 on your telephone keypad if joining by phone only.

The most effective method of communication with the City Council is by sending an email to [email protected] Comments will be reviewed and distributed before the meeting if received by 5:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. All comments received will become part of the record.

Council will have the option to modify their action on items based on comments received.

AGENDA MATERIALS
Agenda materials, staff reports and background information related to regular agenda items are available on the City of Marina’s website www.cityofmarina.org. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available on the City of Marina website www.cityofmarina.org subject to City staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.

VISION STATEMENT
Marina will grow and mature from a small town bedroom community to a small city which is diversified, vibrant and through positive relationships with regional agencies, self -sufficient. The City will develop in a way that insulates it from the negative impacts of urban sprawl to become a desirable residential and business community in a natural setting. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 16, 2026 Page 2

MISSION STATEMENT
The City Council will provide the leadership in protecting Marina’s natural setting while developing the City in a way that provides a balance of housing, jobs and business opportunities that will result in a community characterized by a desirable quality of life, including recreation and cultural opportunities, a safe environment and an economic viability that supports a high level of municipal services and infrastructure. (Resolution No. 2006-112 - May 2, 2006)

LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The City recognizes that it was founded and is built upon the traditional homelands and villages first inhabited by the Indigenous Peoples of this region - the Esselen and their ancestors and allies - and honors these members of the community, both past and present.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM: (City Council, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonprofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Members and Marina Groundwater Sustainability Agency) Jenny McAdams, Brian McCarthy, Kathy Biala, Mayor Pro-Tem/Vice Chair Liesbeth Visscher, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None

4. CLOSED SESSION:
a. Conference with Legal Counsel, Anticipated Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)(4)), 1 potential case. City Council to consider initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(4). b. Public Employment Appointment (Govt. Code §54957)
Position: City Manager
c. Real Property Negotiation (Govt. Code Section 54956.8) i. Property: Portion of 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, Assessor’s Parcel Number 032-303-013-000
Negotiating Party: T-Mobile West LLC
Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
ii. Property: Portion of 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, Assessor’s Parcel Number 032-303-013-000
Negotiating Party: CCTM1 LLC
Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
6:30 PM - RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN

CLOSED SESSION

5. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. The Village Project Emanyatta Warriors
b. Dean Xu Jing Atherton Proclamation
c. Introduction of Kristan Mauer, Fire Chief

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 16, 2026 Page 3

7. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS:

9. CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Background information has been provided to the Successor Agency of the former Redevelopment Agency on all matters listed under the Consent Agenda, and these items are considered to be routine and non -controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda are normally approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of the public or City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, the Council may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. If an item is pulled for discussion, it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency.

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 16, 2026 Page 4

g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, calling for a general municipal election in the City of Marina on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the election of certain city officers; and requesting the Count y of Monterey agree to the consolidation of the election with the statewide general election and requesting the County Elections Department to render any and all services required to conduct the election.
(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, authorizing the City Manager to Execute Agreements with Flock Safety for the Deployment of a Drone First Responder Program and Mobile Security Trailer Program, Subject to Approval as to Form by the City Attorney.
(3) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, authorizing the City Manager to execute a Refund Services Engagement Agreement with MG
Environmental, LLC to pursue potential refunds and reimbursements related to hazardous waste disposal fees and environmental regulatory charges on behalf of the City of Marina, subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.
(4) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, approving the 8 th Street Easement Agreement between the City of Marina and California State University, Monterey Bay (CSUMB), and; accepting and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.
h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS:
(1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, accepting the dedication of Public Improvements as shown on the approved Dunes (Formerly University Village) Improvement Plans and Parcel Map for Phase 1B -Promenade, and; authorizing the City Clerk to release bond securities, accept a warranty bond, and record acceptance with Monterey County Recorder’s Office.
i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE):
(1) Receive Monterey-Salinas Transit June 8, 2026, Board Meeting Highlights. k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS: None
l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING): None
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS: None

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS: In the Council’s discretion, the applicant/proponent of an item may be given up to ten (10) minutes to speak. All other persons may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak on the matter.
a. Open public hearing and consider adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, confirming diagram, assessment and ordering levy of $182.42 for FY 2026 -27 assessment for Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District; and, Authorize Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 16, 2026 Page 5

the City Clerk to file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the Monterey County Auditor-Controller prior to August 1, 2026. b. Open public hearing and c onsider adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, confirming diagram, assessment and ordering levy of $77.14 for FY 2026 -27 assessment for the Monterey Bay Estates Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Assessment District; and authorize the City Clerk to file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the Monterey County Auditor -Controller prior to August 1, 2026.

12. OTHER ACTIONS ITEMS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY : Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The Successor Agency may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

13. OTHER ACTION ITEMS: Action listed for each Agenda item is that which is requested by staff. The City Council may, at its discretion, take action on any items. Members of the public may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak.

Note: No additional major projects or programs should be undertaken without review of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006). a. Receive presentation from FM3 Consultant regarding Community Opinion Survey and Provide direction to staff regarding the specific characteristics of a potential Marina Utility User Tax (UUT), including rate, covered utilities, and exemptions.
b. Receive an informational update and presentation from Tripepi Smith regarding the community feedback form results; and receive presentation from Kimley-Horn regarding roundabout designs, traffic flow and traffic safety; and provide directions to city staff regarding short - and long -term improvements to downtown Marina, including pedestrian and bicyclist improvements and other enhancements to the Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard corridors and the Del Monte and Reservation intersection. c. Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, approving the authorization of 1) Submittal of an application for installation of new signage at the subject site; and 2) Rebranding from Shell Oil to Gulf Oil.
d. Open public hearing and conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 2026 -, adding Chapter 1.16 (Custody and Use of City Seal, City Logo, and City Insignia) to Title 1 (General Provisions) of the Marina Municipal Code; waive further reading; and introduce the ordinance.

14. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council reports on meetings and conferences attended ( Gov’t Code Section 53232).

15. ADJOURNMENT:

Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 16, 2026 Page 6

CERTIFICATION
I, Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Marina, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at City Hall and Council Chambers Bulletin Board at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Monterey County Library Marina Branch at 190 Seaside Circle, City Bulletin Board at the corner of Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard on or before 7:30 p.m., Friday, June 12, 2026.
___________________________________

ANITA SHARP, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
City Council, Airport Commission and Redevelopment Agency meetings are recorded on tape and available for public review and listening at the Office of the City Clerk and kept for a period of 90 days after the formal approval of MINUTES.

City Council meetings may be viewed live on the meeting night and at 12:30 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. on Cable Channel 25 on the Sunday following the Regular City Council meeting date. In addition, Council meetings can be viewed at 6:30 p.m. every Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. For more information about viewing the Council Meetings on Channel 25, you may contact Access Monterey Peninsula directly at 831-333-1267.

Agenda items and staff reports are public record and are available for public review on the City's website (www.ciytofmarina.org), at the Monterey County Marina Library Branch at 190 Seaside Circle and at the Office of the City Clerk at 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina between the hours of 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m., on the Monday preceding the meeting.

Supplemental materials received after the close of the final agenda and through noon on the day of the scheduled meeting will be available for public review at the City Clerk’s Office during regular office hours and in a ‘Supplemental Binder’ at the meeting.

ALL MEETINGS ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. THE CITY OF MARINA DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible. Meetings are broadcast on cable channel 25 and recordings of meetings can be provided upon request. To request assistive listening devices, sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please call (831) 884-1278 or e-mail:
[email protected]. Requests must be made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.

U p c o m i n g 2 0 2 6 M e e t i n g s o f t h e C i t y C o u n c i l , A i r p o r t C o m m i s s i o n , M a r i n a A b r a m s B N o n - P r o f i t C o r p o r a t i o n , P r e s t o n P a r k S u s t a i n a b l e C o m m u n i t y N o n p r o f i t C o r p o r a t i o n , S u c c e s s o r A g e n c y o f t h e F o r m e r R e d e v e l o p m e n t A g e n c y a n d M a r i n a G r o u n d w a t e r S u s t a i n a b i l i t y A g e n c y R e g u l a r M e e t i n g s : 5 : 0 0 p . m . C l o s e d S e s s i o n ; 6 : 3 0 p . m . R e g u l a r O p e n S e s s i o n s
Tuesday, July 7, 2026
Tuesday, July 21, 2026 (Cancelled)
Tuesday, October 6, 2026
Tuesday, October 20, 2026
**Wednesday, August 5, 2026
Tuesday, August 18, 2026 (Cancelled
***Wednesday, November 4, 2026
Tuesday, November 17, 2026
Tuesday, September 1, 2026
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Tuesday, December 1, 2026
Tuesday, December 15, 2026
Agenda for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 16, 2026 Page 7

** Regular Meeting rescheduled due to National Night Out *** Regular Meeting rescheduled due to City Election Day

C I T Y H A L L 202 6 H O L I D A Y S
(City Hall Closed)

Juneteenth Day--------------------------------------------------------------- Friday, June 19, 2026 Independence Day (City Offices Closed) ---------------------------------- Friday, July 3, 2026 Labor Day ------------------------------------------------------------ Monday, September 7, 2026 Veterans Day (City Offices Closed) ------------------------- Wednesday, November 11, 2026 Thanksgiving Day ------------------------------------------------- Thursday, November 26, 2026 Thanksgiving Break -------------------------------------------------- Friday, November 27, 2026 Winter Break ----------------- Thursday, December 24, 2026- Thursday, December 31, 2026

2026 COMMISSION DATES

U p c o m i n g 2026 M e e t i n g s o f P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n 2nd and 4th Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

June 10, 2026 September 9, 2026 November 11, 2026
June 24, 2026 September 26, 2026 November 25, 2026 (Cancelled) July 8, 2026 October 14, 2026 December 9, 2026
July 22, 2026 October 23, 2026 December 23, 2026
August 12, 2026 November 11, 2026
August 26, 2026

U p c o m i n g 2026 M e e t i n g s o f P u b l i c W o r k s C o m m i s s i o n 1st Thursday of every month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

July 2, 2026 September 3, 2026 November 5, 2026
August 6, 2026 October 1, 2026 December 3, 2026

U p c o m i n g 2 0 2 6 M e e t i n g s o f R e c r e a t i o n & C u l t u r a l S e r v i c e s C o m m i s s i o n
4th Wednesday of every second month. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

July 22, 2026

September 23, 2026

December 2, 2026

U p c o m i n g 2 0 2 6 M e e t i n g s o f M a r i n a T r e e C o m m i t t e e 2nd Wednesday of every quarter month as needed. Meetings are held at the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.

July 8, 2026 October 14, 2026

Agenda Item: 6b
Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.010 - Prof Svc Admin - Muni Code
10149 - Code Publishing Inc. - General
Code
GCI0019957 MMC WebUpdate Paid by Check
# 109394
05/28/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 196.00
Account 6300.010 - Prof Svc Admin - Muni Code Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $196.00 Account 6300.465 - Prof Svc Legal - Special Counsel
11425 - Formation Environmental, LLC 8727 Expert Witness Svc- Lone RMC Lonestar
StateWaterResConBoar
d
Paid by EFT #
7763
07/28/2024 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 3,120.00
11425 - Formation Environmental, LLC 9455 RMC Lonestar Litigation - June 2025
Paid by EFT #
7763
06/29/2025 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 675.00
11425 - Formation Environmental, LLC 10231 RMC Lonestar Litigation - Oct-Nov. 2025
Paid by EFT #
7763
11/30/2025 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 3,001.88
11425 - Formation Environmental, LLC 10230 RMC Lonestar Litigation - Sept.-Nov. 2025
Paid by EFT #
7763
11/30/2025 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 107,619.42
11425 - Formation Environmental, LLC 10307 RMC Lonestar Litigation - December 2025
Paid by EFT #
7763
12/28/2025 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 8,650.00
11033 - Sara Steck Myers 06-01-26 Professional Services - MPWSP - Mar-May
2026
Paid by EFT #
7772
06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 11,490.00
Account 6300.465 - Prof Svc Legal - Special Counsel Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $134,556.30 Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11289 - Cypress Court Reporting, Inc. 14004 CA Coastal Commission Hearing - Nov. 17,
2025 Partial Transcript
Paid by Check
# 109397
05/20/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 306.94
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $306.94 Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 306066 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
05/23/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 210.73
12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 294540 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
02/06/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 104.19
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $314.92 Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
10667 - Layne Long - Employee 06-01-26 Mileage
Reimbursement - May
27-28, 2026 CDP
Coastal Commission
Paid by Check
# 109407
06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 167.18
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 1 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
Agenda Item: 10a
1 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel
12377 - Municipal Resource Group, LLC 260495 Training Paid by Check # 109439
05/14/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 06/05/2026 3,325.00
Account 6500.700 - Training & Travel Training & Travel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $3,492.18 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $138,866.34 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $138,866.34 Department 120 - City Mgr/HR/Risk Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $138,866.34 Department 125 - I. T.

Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.330 - Prof Svc IT - Information Tech Svc
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
Corporation
13756 IT Support - May 2026 Paid by EFT #
7774
06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 11,400.00
Account 6300.330 - Prof Svc IT - Information Tech Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $11,400.00 Account 6300.331 - Prof Svc IT - Website Svc
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
Corporation
14004 Zoom - May 2026 Paid by EFT #
7774
05/20/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 599.82
Account 6300.331 - Prof Svc IT - Website Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $599.82 Account 6360.076 - Maint & Repairs Copier
10406 - Monterey Bay Systems 513981 City Hall Copier
Maintenance Contract-
June-Aug. 2026
Paid by EFT #
7770
05/26/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 701.22
Account 6360.076 - Maint & Repairs Copier Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $701.22 Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint 10897 - TechRx Technology Services
Corporation
13790 Ninite Subscription
June 2026
Paid by EFT #
7774
06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 216.00
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
Corporation
13783 Amazon Glacier -
Subscription - June
2026
Paid by EFT #
7774
06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 475.00
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
Corporation
13770 Veeam Subscription -
June 2025
Paid by EFT #
7774
06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 544.00
10897 - TechRx Technology Services
Corporation
13786 Veeam O365 Backup &
Glacier Storage - June
2026
Paid by EFT #
7774
06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 400.00
10905 - Taygeta Scientific, Inc. 000423-R-0090 Computer Network Defense - June 2026
Paid by Check
# 109431
06/01/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 2,833.33
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 2 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
2 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 125 - I. T.

Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint 10905 - Taygeta Scientific, Inc. 000708-R-0063 Barracuda Spam Firewall - June 2026
Paid by Check
# 109431
06/01/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 585.60
Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint Totals Invoice Transactions 6 $5,053.93 Account 6360.345 - Maint & Repairs Citywide Microsoft Ofc Upgrade 10897 - TechRx Technology Services
Corporation
13766 Citywide MS Office 365
- June 2026
Paid by EFT #
7774
06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 3,041.60
Account 6360.345 - Maint & Repairs Citywide Microsoft Ofc Upgrade Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $3,041.60 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $20,796.57 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $20,796.57 Department 125 - I. T. Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $20,796.57 Department 150 - City Attorney
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc 11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP 296914 City Attorney Services - April 2026
Paid by EFT #
7773
05/26/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 29,505.87
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP 296911 Code Enforcement - April 2026
Paid by EFT #
7773
05/26/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 11,831.85
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP 296921 Finance - April 2026 Paid by EFT # 7773
05/26/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 3,425.40
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP 296915 Fire Department - April 2026
Paid by EFT #
7773
05/26/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 103.80
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP 296913 Human Resources and Risk - April 2026
Paid by EFT #
7773
05/26/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 519.00
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP 296917 Planning
Commission/Developm
ent - April 2026
Paid by EFT #
7773
05/26/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 33,330.25
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP 296918 Parks - April 2026 Paid by EFT # 7773
05/26/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 2,110.60
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP 296919 Police Department - April 2026
Paid by EFT #
7773
05/26/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 1,698.85
11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP 296920 Public Works - April 2026
Paid by EFT #
7773
05/26/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 11,221.80
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 3 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
3 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 150 - City Attorney
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc 10257 - Goldfarb & Lipman 494410 General - April 2026 Paid by EFT # 7765
05/29/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 2,123.25
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $95,870.67 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $95,870.67 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $95,870.67 Department 150 - City Attorney Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $95,870.67 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6150.500 - Medical Vision
10607 - Vision Service Plan 06-01-26. VSP Adjustment
(06.2026)
Paid by EFT #
7776
06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 257.59
Account 6150.500 - Medical Vision Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $257.59 Account 6300.217 - Prof Svc Fin - Business Lic Services 10274 - Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates
( HDL )
SIN063674 April 2026 BL Admin
Fee
Paid by EFT #
7767
04/30/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 999.95
Account 6300.217 - Prof Svc Fin - Business Lic Services Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $999.95 Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10274 - Hinderliter, de Llamas & Associates
( HDL )
SIN063675 April 2026 HDL - TOT Paid by EFT #
7767
04/30/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 2,622.05
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,622.05 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000025298946 CALNET3-9391023477 (582-9803)
Paid by Check
# 109386
05/27/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 32.46
10758 - AT & T CALNET3 000025298940 CALNET3-9391023471 (582-0100)
Paid by Check
# 109386
05/27/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 67.41
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $99.87 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
018
208 Palm Avenue Paid by Check
# 109409
05/12/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 300.82
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
020
304 Hillcrest Avenue Paid by Check
# 109409
05/12/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 109.63
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
017
208 Palm Avenue, Unit
A
Paid by Check
# 109409
05/12/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 84.45
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 4 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
4 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
025
327 Reindollar Avenue
Sewer
Paid by Check
# 109409
05/12/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 43.48
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $538.38 Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping
10480 - Pitney Bowes 3107910865 Postage Meter
Quarterly Lease -
March-June 2026
Paid by Check
# 109417
05/30/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 1,566.89
Account 6400.635 - Material & Suppl Postage Shipping Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $1,566.89 Account 6600.600 - Other Charges Other
11889 - Gladwell Govermental Services Inc 6065 Records Retention Legal Review FY 25-26
Paid by Check
# 109402
01/25/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 75.00
Account 6600.600 - Other Charges Other Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $75.00 Account 6600.625 - Other Charges Printing Svc
12398 - Final Option Corp / Pacific Printing 59025 Marina Bifold Postcard Mailer and mailing Svc.

Paid by Check
# 109398
05/29/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 14,648.60
Account 6600.625 - Other Charges Printing Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $14,648.60 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $20,808.33 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $20,808.33 Department 190 - Citywide Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $20,808.33 Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10107 - California Towing & Transport 215540 JUMP START CALL #275340437
Paid by Check
# 109391
05/26/2026 06/25/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 150.00
11458 - Ganete Solutions, Inc. /
ArmorerLink
1805022 FIREARM MGMT

SYSTM ANL SUBSCR &

PHN SCAN ANL LIC
7/1/26-6/30/27
Paid by Check
# 109400
06/01/2026 07/01/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 2,900.00
12065 - Hasco Stations, LLC HCL-061802-26 CAR WASH ACCT # 23680
Paid by Check
# 109403
05/31/2026 06/15/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 102.00
10326 - Language Line Services,
Inc/LanguageLine Solutions
11903758 TRANSLATION
SERVICES ACCT #
9020101064
Paid by Check
# 109406
04/30/2026 05/30/2026 05/11/2026 06/05/2026 153.22
10342 - Monterey County Peace Officers
Association-MCPOA
A19-00191 05/31/2026 MCPOA

SHOOTING RANGE USE
Paid by Check
# 109412
05/31/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 1,050.00
11899 - Robert Half International, Inc 66224585 ad Paid by Check # 109422
05/18/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 1,930.97
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 5 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
5 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11899 - Robert Half International, Inc 66269537 Admin Temp - JoAnn Wilson
Paid by Check
# 109422
06/01/2026 06/03/2026 06/03/2026 06/05/2026 1,541.12
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 7 $7,827.31 Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint 10143 - CivicPlus, LLC 369995 Next Request Annual
Fee 7/1/26 - 6/30/27
Paid by EFT #
7759
07/01/2026 07/31/2026 05/07/2026 06/05/2026 10,570.77
11957 - Flock Group, Inc. / Flock Safety INV-92036 SOLAR VIDEO CAMERA PTZ, fka CONDOR
Paid by EFT #
7762
04/16/2026 05/16/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 291.09
Account 6360.342 - Maint & Repairs IT - System Annual Maint Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $10,861.86 Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr
12146 - MRC Smart Tech. Solutions/MR
COPY INC DBA:XBS-WEST
IN5399827 METER READ Paid by Check
# 109414
05/29/2026 06/28/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 196.66
Account 6360.570 - Maint & Repairs Other Svc Agr Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $196.66 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6143876014 PD DEPARTMENT CELL PHONES ACCT #
272493672-00001
Paid by EFT #
7775
05/18/2026 06/10/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 2,485.28
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $2,485.28 Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System
10057 - Avaya, Inc. 2222092354 MONTHLY HARDWARE

SVCS ACCT
#100828859
Paid by EFT #
7756
05/28/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 10.30
10057 - Avaya, Inc. 2222089706 MONTHLY HARDWARE

SVCS ACCT
#100828859
Paid by EFT #
7756
05/03/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 2.19
10374 - Maynard Group Inc. IN2066785 UTILITIES PHONES
ACCT #AC3746
Paid by EFT #
7769
06/01/2026 07/01/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 681.25
Account 6380.150 - Utilities Comm Phone System Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $693.74 Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 306066 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
05/23/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 8,007.84
12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 294540 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
02/06/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 3,959.38
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $11,967.22 Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip
10727 - Ace Hardware-Public Safety 094299 HVY DUTY SPONGE; METAL HOSE NOZL;
50FT HOSE COIL
Paid by Check
# 109382
05/27/2026 06/10/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 98.27
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 6 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
6 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip
11400 - BPS Tactical, Inc. 26020918 DUTY VESTS -

SIEVERS, BAINS,

MOROZOVA
Paid by Check
# 109388
05/08/2026 06/07/2026 05/11/2026 06/05/2026 2,709.31
11400 - BPS Tactical, Inc. 26021002 MOLLE POCKETS LAPD BLUE
Paid by Check
# 109388
05/19/2026 06/18/2026 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 568.71
10330 - LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY

LTD/LC ACTION POLICE SUPPL
485418 GLOCK ACCESSORIES

RED DOT HOLSTER
Paid by Check
# 109408
03/04/2026 04/03/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 890.55
Account 6400.720 - Material & Suppl Safety Equip Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $4,266.84 Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
10309 - Salinas Valley Pro Squad 023002 UNIFORM - T.

BRANNON
Paid by Check
# 109423
05/05/2026 06/04/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 190.93
10309 - Salinas Valley Pro Squad 022908 UNIFORM - J.

KOBAYASHI
Paid by Check
# 109423
04/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 825.86
10309 - Salinas Valley Pro Squad 023039 UNIFORM - B. SIEVERS Paid by Check # 109423
05/18/2026 06/17/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 383.45
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $1,400.24 Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST
10629 - Anthony Aiello - Employee 5-18-26 Per Diem - Aiello - Intro to Supervision
Course
Paid by Check
# 109385
05/27/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 70.00
11752 - Francisco Tapia - Employee 5-18-26 Per Diem - Tapia - Intro to Supervision
Course
Paid by EFT #
7764
05/27/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 70.00
11824 - Gabriel Rose - Employee 5-18-26 Per Diem - Rose - Intro to Supervision Course
Paid by Check
# 109399
05/27/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 70.00
11659 - Shivdev Dhillon - Employee 5-18-26 Per Diem - Dhillon - Intro to Supervision
Course
Paid by Check
# 109425
05/27/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 70.00
11659 - Shivdev Dhillon - Employee 6-10-26 Per Diem - Dhillon Use of Force Decision
Making
Paid by Check
# 109425
05/28/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 35.00
Account 6500.620 - Training & Travel POST Totals Invoice Transactions 5 $315.00 Account 6600.490 - Other Charges Membership Prof Orgs
10095 - California Police Chiefs Association 16417 7/1/26-6/30/27 CPCA DUES FOR 26-50

PERSONNEL
Paid by Check
# 109389
07/01/2026 07/30/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 559.00
Account 6600.490 - Other Charges Membership Prof Orgs Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $559.00 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 7 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
7 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 210 - Police
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6600.780 - Other Charges Transcription Svc
10544 - SpeakWrite 6d5f18f3 TRANSCRIPTION

SERVICES-ONLINE

REPORTING
Paid by Check
# 109426
06/01/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 426.12
Account 6600.780 - Other Charges Transcription Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $426.12 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 30 $40,999.27 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 30 $40,999.27 Department 210 - Police Totals Invoice Transactions 30 $40,999.27 Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0178257 Pest Control - 3260 Imjin Rd
Paid by Check
# 109401
05/08/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 06/05/2026 90.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126227 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
3090 Samwill Court
Paid by EFT #
7755
05/22/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126226 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
589 Inyo Court
Paid by EFT #
7755
05/22/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126225 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
592 Inyo Court
Paid by EFT #
7755
05/22/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126224 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
263 Santa Lucia Lane
Paid by EFT #
7755
05/22/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126223 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
254 Santa Lucia Lane
Paid by EFT #
7755
05/22/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126222 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
253 Laguna Seca Lane
Paid by EFT #
7755
05/22/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 230.00
10841 - Art Black / Carmel Fire Protection 126221 Residential Fire Sprinkler Inspection for
255 Laguna Seca Lane
Paid by EFT #
7755
05/22/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 230.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 8 $1,700.00 Account 6360.566 - Maint & Repairs Other Equipment
12394 - Witmer Public Safety Group, Inc INV903903 Shut Off Valve Swivel

1.5in NH
Paid by Check
# 109436
06/02/2026 06/03/2026 06/03/2026 06/05/2026 472.83
Account 6360.566 - Maint & Repairs Other Equipment Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $472.83 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 8 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
8 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 250 - Fire
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6144504021 371782403-00002 FD Mobile Apr 26 - May 25
Paid by EFT #
7775
05/25/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 584.40
Account 6380.300 - Utilities Gas & Electric Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $584.40 Account 6400.100 - Material & Suppl CSA 74 Funded
12459 - Ring Rescue Inc. SO-1795 Ring Rescue Kit Paid by Check # 109420
05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 3,435.00
Account 6400.100 - Material & Suppl CSA 74 Funded Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $3,435.00 Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 306066 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
05/23/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 2,016.15
12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 294540 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
02/06/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 312.58
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $2,328.73 Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl
11393 - Carmel Roasters, Inc./Carmel
Valley Coffee Roastin
75180 FD Coffee - 3 Boxes
and Filters
Paid by Check
# 109393
06/03/2026 06/03/2026 06/03/2026 06/05/2026 334.77
Account 6400.740 - Material & Suppl Special Dept Suppl Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $334.77 Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform
12452 - TEXOMA INNOVATIONS, INC. /

CREATIVE CASTING

26.0335 Set Up Fee for FD Belt
Buckles
Paid by Check
# 109432
05/14/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 400.00
Account 6400.800 - Material & Suppl Uniform Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $400.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $9,255.73 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $9,255.73 Department 250 - Fire Totals Invoice Transactions 15 $9,255.73 Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship
10250 - Gavilan Pest Control 0178048 Pest Control - 2660 5th Ave
Paid by Check
# 109401
05/08/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 06/05/2026 105.00
12279 - RJ Parlay Inc./ClearBLu
Environmental
35691 Cold Pressure Washer Paid by Check
# 109421
04/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/21/2026 06/05/2026 631.80
Account 6360.065 - Maint & Repairs Bdg NonFlagship Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $736.80 Account 6360.170 - Maint & Repairs Elevator Svc
10196 - State Labor Commissioner State of
California-Dept. of Industrial Relations
S 2264425 SJ Elevator Unit Invoice
097348
Paid by Check
# 109427
03/12/2026 04/28/2026 04/28/2026 06/05/2026 675.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 9 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
9 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.170 - Maint & Repairs Elevator Svc
10196 - State Labor Commissioner State of
California-Dept. of Industrial Relations
E 2239333 SJ Conveyance Invoice
Remittance 097348
Paid by Check
# 109427
03/29/2026 04/28/2026 04/28/2026 06/05/2026 450.00
Account 6360.170 - Maint & Repairs Elevator Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,125.00 Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
011
3254 Abdy Way (Tate
Park - Irrigation)
Paid by Check
# 109409
05/05/2026 05/20/2026 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 657.30
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
034
3240 De Forest Rd Paid by Check
# 109409
05/05/2026 05/20/2026 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 864.37
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
098
3254 Abdy Way (Tate
Park - Building)
Paid by Check
# 109409
05/05/2026 05/20/2026 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 86.77
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
106
306 Reservation Rd Paid by Check
# 109409
05/05/2026 05/20/2026 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 87.96
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
014
3200 Del Monte Blvd Paid by Check
# 109409
05/05/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 3,072.88
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Apr 2026 56-
099
9th street West of 2nd
Avenue
Paid by Check
# 109409
04/27/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 1,690.85
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Apr 2026 56-
100
9th Street Irrigation
Parcels L & M
Paid by Check
# 109409
04/27/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 2,331.48
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
001
209-13 Cypress Avenue Paid by Check
# 109409
05/12/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 237.11
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Apr 2026 56-
107
9th Street Irrigation Paid by Check
# 109409
04/27/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 1,192.79
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Apr 2026 56-
108
Imjin Pkwy & Marina
Heights Irrigation
Paid by Check
# 109409
04/27/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 2,246.54
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Apr 2026 56-
109
8th Street Hilltop Park
Temp Irrigation
Paid by Check
# 109409
04/27/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 696.75
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
019
211 Hillcrest Avenue Paid by Check
# 109409
05/12/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 840.12
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Apr 2026 56-
112
NE Corner Imjin Pkwy
& E Abrams Dr
Paid by Check
# 109409
04/27/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 271.16
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Apr 2026 56-
103
2840 Fifth Avenue Paid by Check
# 109409
04/27/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 129.21
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Apr 2026 56-
102
9th St & 4th Ave Paid by Check
# 109409
04/27/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 134.44
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Apr 2026 56-
110
9th St & 4th Ave Paid by Check
# 109409
04/27/2026 05/24/2026 05/24/2026 06/05/2026 86.47
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
111
Imjin Pkwy & Preston
Dr
Paid by Check
# 109409
05/19/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 5,167.84
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 10 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
10 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer
10349 - Marina Coast Water District May 2026 56-
045
3100 Preston Drive Paid by Check
# 109409
05/19/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 3,433.36
Account 6380.500 - Utilities Water & Sewer Totals Invoice Transactions 18 $23,227.40 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
12248 - Blue Triton Brands Inc 06E8720337299 209 Cypress Ave 4/15/26-5/14/26
Paid by Check
# 109387
05/16/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 92.73
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $92.73 Account 6400.737 - Material & Suppl Tools & Equip
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 093835 Material – Facilities, Grounds
Paid by Check
# 109383
03/24/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 27.29
Account 6400.737 - Material & Suppl Tools & Equip Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $27.29 Account 6400.742 - Material & Suppl Sprinklers/Plants/Fertilizer 10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 093827 Buildings and Grounds Paid by Check # 109383
03/23/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 14.37
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 093820 Material & Suppl – Grounds
Paid by Check
# 109383
03/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 33.81
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 093849 Material & Suppl – Grounds
Paid by Check
# 109383
03/25/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 72.00
Account 6400.742 - Material & Suppl Sprinklers/Plants/Fertilizer Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $120.18 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 27 $25,329.40 Division 311 - Buildings & Grounds Totals Invoice Transactions 27 $25,329.40 Division 313 - Vehicle Maint
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2686 Oil Change 2018
Chevrolet Colorado LT
(White)
Paid by Check
# 109438
05/29/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 51.00
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2673 Diagnostic 2006 Ford F-450 Super Duty XL
Paid by Check
# 109438
05/21/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 1,700.00
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2684 Tow Truck 2022 Dodge
Durango Pursuit (Black,
#825)
Paid by Check
# 109438
05/29/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 286.00
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2676 Break Job and Oil
Change 2022 Dodge
Durango Pursuit (Black,
#824
Paid by Check
# 109438
05/14/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 731.00
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2671 Oil Leak 2022 Dodge
Durango Pursuit (Black,
#825)
Paid by Check
# 109438
05/08/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 1,020.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 11 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
11 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 313 - Vehicle Maint
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2658 2025 Ford Police
Interceptor Utility Base
(Black, #827
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/29/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 340.00
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2655 2021 Dodge Charger
Pursuit (Black, #822)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/29/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 340.00
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2645 2022 Dodge Durango
Pursuit (Black, #825)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/17/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 1,105.00
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2644 2021 Dodge Charger
Pursuit (Black, #822)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/15/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 1,105.00
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2641 2016 FORD Taurus
(Gray, #810)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/14/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 51.00
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2640 Oil Change 2021
Chevrolet Tahoe LT
(Black, #821)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/14/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 51.00
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2638 2025 Ford Police
Interceptor Utility Base
(Black, #829)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/14/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 51.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 12 $6,831.00 Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2686 Oil Change 2018
Chevrolet Colorado LT
(White)
Paid by Check
# 109438
05/29/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 93.86
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2673 Diagnostic 2006 Ford F-450 Super Duty XL
Paid by Check
# 109438
05/21/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 1,029.60
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2684 Tow Truck 2022 Dodge
Durango Pursuit (Black,
#825)
Paid by Check
# 109438
05/29/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 301.53
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2676 Break Job and Oil
Change 2022 Dodge
Durango Pursuit (Black,
#824
Paid by Check
# 109438
05/14/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 1,217.95
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2671 Oil Leak 2022 Dodge
Durango Pursuit (Black,
#825)
Paid by Check
# 109438
05/08/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 850.51
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2658 2025 Ford Police
Interceptor Utility Base
(Black, #827
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/29/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 371.45
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2645 2022 Dodge Durango
Pursuit (Black, #825)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/17/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 988.48
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2644 2021 Dodge Charger
Pursuit (Black, #822)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/15/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 1,467.48
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 12 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
12 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 310 - Public Works
Division 313 - Vehicle Maint
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2641 2016 FORD Taurus
(Gray, #810)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/14/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 89.45
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2640 Oil Change 2021
Chevrolet Tahoe LT
(Black, #821)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/14/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 131.90
12443 - RAYA AUTOMOTIVE LLC 2638 2025 Ford Police
Interceptor Utility Base
(Black, #829)
Paid by Check
# 109438
04/14/2026 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 90.98
Account 6360.850 - Maint & Repairs Vehicle Totals Invoice Transactions 11 $6,633.19 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 23 $13,464.19 Division 313 - Vehicle Maint Totals Invoice Transactions 23 $13,464.19 Department 310 - Public Works Totals Invoice Transactions 50 $38,793.59 Department 410 - Planning
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 306066 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
05/23/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 210.73
12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 294540 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
02/06/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 104.19
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $314.92 Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies
12248 - Blue Triton Brands Inc 06E8720337299 209 Cypress Ave 4/15/26-5/14/26
Paid by Check
# 109387
05/16/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 92.73
Account 6400.565 - Material & Suppl Office Supplies Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $92.73 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $407.65 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $407.65 Department 410 - Planning Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $407.65 Department 420 - Engineering
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11784 - John Upshaw John Upshaw - DJ
Monterey
2-20-2026 3 hours of DJ Service
for NPWC
Paid by Check
# 109404
02/20/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 900.00
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 13 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
13 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 420 - Engineering
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
12453 - MMJUMPERS & PARTY RENTALS
LLC
22959 Vince DiMaggio Park
NPWC event
Paid by Check
# 109410
05/16/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 545.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $1,445.00 Account 6370.540 - Shared Svc NPDES Contribution
10556 - California State Water Resources
Control Board
SW-0334825 Annual Permit Fee Paid by Check
# 109390
01/07/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 06/05/2026 673.00
Account 6370.540 - Shared Svc NPDES Contribution Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $673.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $2,118.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $2,118.00 Department 420 - Engineering Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $2,118.00 Department 440 - Economic Dev
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11010 - Adams Ashby Group,Inc. 7628 2026 HOME Long-term Monitoring - Rockrose
Gardens Apt.

Paid by Check
# 109384
04/03/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 4,300.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $4,300.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $4,300.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $4,300.00 Department 440 - Economic Dev Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $4,300.00 Department 510 - Recreation & Culture
Division 100 - Admin
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 229085 Custodial Service for May 2026
Paid by EFT #
7758
05/26/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 906.47
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $906.47 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6143833821 542484588-00001 Paid by EFT # 7775
05/17/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 207.64
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $207.64 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 14 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
14 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 510 - Recreation & Culture
Division 100 - Admin
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 306066 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
05/23/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 526.83
12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 294540 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
02/06/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 260.49
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $787.32 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $1,901.43 Division 100 - Admin Totals Invoice Transactions 4 $1,901.43 Division 511 - Youth
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 229085 Custodial Service for May 2026
Paid by EFT #
7758
05/26/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 350.00
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $350.00 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6143833821 542484588-00001 Paid by EFT # 7775
05/17/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 64.01
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $64.01 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $414.01 Division 511 - Youth Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $414.01 Division 512 - Teen
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 229085 Custodial Service for May 2026
Paid by EFT #
7758
05/26/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 474.00
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $474.00 Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6143833821 542484588-00001 Paid by EFT # 7775
05/17/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 51.91
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $51.91 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $525.91 Division 512 - Teen Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $525.91 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 15 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
15 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 100 - General Fund
Department 510 - Recreation & Culture
Division 513 - Senior
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial
10080 - Branch's Janitorial 229085 Custodial Service for May 2026
Paid by EFT #
7758
05/26/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 329.00
Account 6360.360 - Maint & Repairs Janitorial Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $329.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $329.00 Division 513 - Senior Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $329.00 Division 514 - Sports
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager
10603 - Verizon Wireless 6143833821 542484588-00001 Paid by EFT # 7775
05/17/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 51.91
Account 6380.120 - Utilities Comm Mobile & Pager Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $51.91 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $51.91 Division 514 - Sports Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $51.91 Department 510 - Recreation & Culture Totals Invoice Transactions 10 $3,222.26 Fund 100 - General Fund Totals Invoice Transactions 156 $375,438.41 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 16 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
16 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 110 - Vehicle and Equipment
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6600.450 - Other Charges Leases & Rents
11491 - Enterprise FM Trust - Fleet Lease
payments only
FBN5638215 Lease Payment for May
2026
Paid by EFT #
7761
05/05/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 33,060.30
Account 6600.450 - Other Charges Leases & Rents Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $33,060.30 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $33,060.30 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $33,060.30 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $33,060.30 Fund 110 - Vehicle and Equipment Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $33,060.30 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 17 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
17 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 255 - Housing Assistance Fund
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6600.400 - Other Charges - Fees
12067 - Sterling Management / Sterling
Property Management
06-01-26 306 Reservation Road -
HOA Fee - June 2026
Paid by Check
# 109428
06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 555.98
Account 6600.400 - Other Charges - Fees Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $555.98 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $555.98 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $555.98 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $555.98 Fund 255 - Housing Assistance Fund Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $555.98 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 18 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
18 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 312 - 2015 GO Refunding Bonds Library
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.226 - Prof Svc Fin - Fees - Trustee
11250 - U.S. Bank 8199054 Acct#
6712129600/2015
General Obligation
Refund. Bond Admin
Fee
Paid by Check
# 109433
05/22/2026 06/03/2026 06/03/2026 06/05/2026 636.00
Account 6300.226 - Prof Svc Fin - Fees - Trustee Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $636.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $636.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $636.00 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $636.00 Fund 312 - 2015 GO Refunding Bonds Library Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $636.00 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 19 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
19 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 422 - Capital Projects - Measure X
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11847 - BKF Engineers 26010504 Slurry Seal and
Microsurfacing Streets
Paid by EFT #
7757
01/22/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 13,593.25
11847 - BKF Engineers 26010502 Marina Pavement
Management Program
Paid by EFT #
7757
01/22/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 2,462.75
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $16,056.00 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $16,056.00 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $16,056.00 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $16,056.00 Fund 422 - Capital Projects - Measure X Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $16,056.00 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 20 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
20 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 462 - City Capital Projects
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
10268 - Harris & Associates, Inc. 72380 Imjin Parkway
Improvement Plan
Paid by EFT #
7766
05/21/2026 05/21/2026 05/21/2026 06/05/2026 39,781.52
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 35580705 Dunes & 2nd Paid by Check # 109405
04/30/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 17,032.54
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 67967 Professional services rendered through April
30, 2026
Paid by Check
# 109434
05/20/2026 05/27/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 86,465.44
12409 - WithersRavenel, Inc. 191451 Facility Condition Assessment
Paid by Check
# 109435
05/06/2026 05/22/2026 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 34,102.20
12266 - Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc. 55913 Marina Sidewalk Infill Project
Paid by Check
# 109437
05/19/2026 06/03/2026 06/03/2026 06/05/2026 59,400.00
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 094095 Vince DiMaggio Improvements
Paid by Check
# 109383
04/27/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 54.44
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 093815 Vince DiMaggio Improvements
Paid by Check
# 109383
03/20/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 29.42
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 094094 Vince DiMaggio Improvements
Paid by Check
# 109383
04/27/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 105.76
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 094092 Vince DiMaggio Improvements
Paid by Check
# 109383
04/27/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 17.44
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 094128 Vince DiMaggio Improvements
Paid by Check
# 109383
04/30/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 116.84
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 094122 Vince DiMaggio Improvements
Paid by Check
# 109383
04/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 30.56
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 094110 Vince DiMaggio Improvements
Paid by Check
# 109383
04/28/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 91.92
10728 - Ace Hardware-Public Works 094101 Vince DiMaggio Improvements
Paid by Check
# 109383
04/28/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 130.49
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 34527120 DEV. IMPACT FEE Paid by Check # 109405
12/31/2025 05/07/2026 05/07/2026 06/05/2026 7,677.50
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 35654513 Del Monte Blvd & Beach Rd
Paid by Check
# 109405
04/30/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 1,374.75
10316 - Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. 35779454 Del Monte - Reservation PS&E
Paid by Check
# 109405
04/30/2026 06/03/2026 06/03/2026 06/05/2026 4,473.98
10831 - Kompan, Inc. INV138082 Glorya Jean Tate Park Paid by EFT # 7768
04/30/2026 06/03/2026 06/03/2026 06/05/2026 2,500.00
10425 - Monterey Peninsula Engineering 26-04-24 GLORYA JEAN TATE

PARK IMPROVEMENTS
PHASE 2 PROJECT
Paid by Check
# 109413
04/30/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 163,089.35
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 21 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
21 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 462 - City Capital Projects
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other
11489 - Wallace Group, Inc. 67905 Dunes Park
Undergrounding
Paid by Check
# 109434
05/20/2026 05/20/2026 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 2,348.00
Account 6300.570 - Prof Svc Other Totals Invoice Transactions 19 $418,822.15 Account 6700.105 - Capital Outlay Construction
10349 - Marina Coast Water District Jun 2026 WHP City of Marina Windy Hill Park Improvements
Paid by Check
# 109409
06/02/2026 06/03/2026 06/03/2026 06/05/2026 13,674.00
10108 - Capitol Barricade, Inc. 189408 Street signs Paid by Check # 109392
05/13/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 06/05/2026 10,325.52
Account 6700.105 - Capital Outlay Construction Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $23,999.52 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 21 $442,821.67 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 21 $442,821.67 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 21 $442,821.67 Fund 462 - City Capital Projects Totals Invoice Transactions 21 $442,821.67 Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 22 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
22 Vendor Invoice No. Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Amount Fund 555 - Marina Airport
Department 000 - Non-Dept
Division 000 - Non-Div
Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc 11964 - Shute Mihaly & Weinberger LLP 296910 Airport - April 2026 Paid by EFT # 7773
05/26/2026 05/28/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 7,127.60
Account 6300.450 - Prof Svc Legal - City Attorney Other Svc Totals Invoice Transactions 1 $7,127.60 Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel 12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 306066 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
05/23/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 316.10
12430 - STURDY OIL COMPANY 294540 City Fuel Paid by Check # 109429
02/06/2026 06/02/2026 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 156.29
Account 6400.230 - Material & Suppl Fuel - Gas and Diesel Totals Invoice Transactions 2 $472.39 Sub-Division 00 - Non-Subdiv Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $7,599.99 Division 000 - Non-Div Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $7,599.99 Department 000 - Non-Dept Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $7,599.99 Fund 555 - Marina Airport Totals Invoice Transactions 3 $7,599.99 Grand Totals Invoice Transactions 185 $876,168.35
Run by Melanie Hernandez on 06/04/2026 02:31:18 PM Page 23 of 23 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report
Payment Date Range 06/05/26 - 06/05/26
23 Agenda Item: 10b(1)
City Council Meeting of
June 16, 2026

ACTION

MINUTES
Tuesday, May 19, 2026 5:00 P.M. Closed Session
6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR

AGENCY OF THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).

Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
AND
Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556

1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:00 P.M.

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM: (City Council, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonprofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Members and Marina Groundwater Sustainability Agency) MEMBERS PRESENT: Jenny McAdams, Brian McCarthy , Kathy Biala , Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mayor Pro-Tem/Vice Chair Liesbeth Visscher

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS:

4. CLOSED SESSION:
a. Real Property Negotiation (Govt. Code Section 54956.8) i. Property: Portion of 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, Assessor’s Parcel Number 032-303-013-000
Negotiating Party: T-Mobile West LLC
Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
ii. Property: Portion of 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, Assessor’s Parcel Number 032-303-013-000
Negotiating Party: CCTM1 LLC
Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
1 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Page 2

b. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)(1)) case(s)
i. Application of California-American Water Company (U210W), Application 21-11-024, California Public Utilities Commission. c. Conference with Legal Counsel, Anticipated Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)(4)), 2 potential cases. City Council to consider initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(4).

6:30 PM - RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN

CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Ortega reported out Closed Session: Council provided direction and no reportable action was taken.

5. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. Introduction of Martha Cortez, CDD Admin Assistant
b. Poppy Month Proclamation
c. Public Works week Proclamation
d. Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month Presentation e. Alexa Johnson, Housing Resource Center (McAdams)
f. Fire Department Open House Volunteer certificates of recognition g. Summer Recreation programs

7. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS:
• City Manager Long announced that this evening was Tori Hannah’s last day with the City.

Spoke about Tori’s financial career and retiring from the public sector • Each Councilmember expressed their gratitude towards Tori for all the hard work she had done during her time with the city.

We were open ed for approximately one year before residents began moving into the 2 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Page 3

promenade rooftops and within the first few months of their move -in, we began receiving noise complaints. On August 15th we received a notice of violation. In response, we agreed to take steps to reduce noise, including moving our karaoke and DJ indoors. We have now a corrective measure that permanently requires we cease the use of amplified speakers and amplified noise. These actions will cause us to cancel several community events if left in force.
• Cassandra Waller, right now, the ordinance can leave businesses uncertain about what is allowed, acceptable sound levels, complaints, and the difference between commercial areas and residential neighborhoods. Asked the council to consider business friendly updates to the noise ordinance such as a live entertainment permit, clear sound standards, indoor entertainment rules, a warning and corrective process and different standards for commercial corridors. Asked the council to put this issue on the agenda for a future meeting and direct staff to review possible updates to the appropriate Marina Municipal codes. • Renee Young, Economic Justice Organizer for the Monterey County Black Caucus, and I'm here tonight because we're deeply concerned about the ongoing enforcement actions being taken against The Brass Tap. This impacts local jobs, economic vitality, and raises serious questions about fairness, planning and accountability. The city helped create this environment. There's an amphitheater and entertainment space located within feet of The Brass Tap. How can the city promote and encourage musical performances in the same shared environment while simultaneously prohibiting a restaurant from operating within entertainment That is consistent with the vision the city itself approved. The Brass Tap was established before surrounding residential housing was fully built out. Residents moving into the area understood they were moving into an active mixed -use promenade adjacent to entertainment and nightlife, and near a college campus. concern is the lack of objective and measurable enforcement standards The city's own code references, measurable Sound levels at decibel standards, including measurements taken at property lines. • LaVisha Franklin encourages the city of Marina to modernize its noise ordinance and create clearer, more business -friendly entertainment rules that still protect residents and neighborhoods. Marina's current ordinance may be too broad and unclear for businesses that are genuinely trying to operate responsibly as The Brass Tap is. Uncertainty discourages investment, creativity, and community events. Encourages the city to consider creating a live entertainment permit system for DJs, live music, karaoke, comedy, and cultural events.

Asked the council to agendize a public discussion and direct staff to study potential updates to Chapter 9.24.
• Athena Burciaga spoke about college kids enjoying the atmosphere of The Brass Tap.

Believes that The Brass Tap is a big part of the Marina culture. Is in favor of Black business, thriving black business in this town, being given a fair shake by the ordinances that we have in place.
• Eric Miller stationed at the former Fort Ord and has watched Marina go from barracks to CSUMB, to the new promenade. Lives across from The Brass Tap. You have done a wonderful job at revitalizing the area and making it more entertaining for a lot of us . Asked for support, but also to modernize the rules so that way business can flourish in the area. • Terry Ward read a text message from someone in Prunedale expressing how they enjoy their Sunday family gatherings at The Brass Tap. Heartbreaking not to hear live music on Sundays. S urprised, the city council of Marina canceled the live music due to noise complaints. Should the complaint of a few individuals trump the positive experience of many? Why do the complaints of individuals move into such a development only to 3 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Page 4

complain about an activity approved by the city? An activity that was meant to enhance the ambiance and the positive experience from the whole community. • Athena Suich invited the Council and the community to Marina’s 1 st ever MDA fundraiser, Fill the Boot Campaign on Saturday, May 30th from 10:00am-2:00pm at the Marina Target. • Lyndon Tar ver, NAACP supports agendizing the city ordinance on noise. Agrees with previous speaker about supporting the brass tap. It's time to update that ordinance and have The Brass Tap function as a fully Black business in the city of Marina. Why handicap them when you knew the Promenade area was mixed-use.
• Denise Turley asked has the business been offered the opportunity to soundproof its facilities so that it can be noisier inside and not as noisy outside? What is the SOMS in that area and is it posted?
• Maiaka Velazquez commented on the reading of the AAPI proclamation by Councilmember Biala. Disappointing that one of the very few Black American freedmen businesses left in Monterey County is now under attack for noise. Explore the council to do the research on the use of this tactic. The current noise ordinance is unclear, and it needs to be updated. We are requesting the city to create a live music entertainment permit for DJs, live music, karaoke, and comedy and cultural events to adopt clear sound limits within property lines and outside.
• Adam Pinterits urge the Council to consider, as you re -examine this ordinance, possibly, to really consider the fairness to the businesses. The brass tap is, to my best of my knowledge, did all the right things, went through all the steps, and got a use permit. So. Check out what is their use permit allow them to do, and let's not go back on that. let's make sure and support our business community, while also respecting the property rights of residents and business owners alike.
• Alastair Rodd commented on the World Cup coming up and looking forward to cheering very loudly outside at a local business and to do that at the heart of the Dunes area. Asked council to consider having a discussion, a public discussion on the noise ordinances for this city and what needs to change in chapter 9.24.
• Francine Rodd appreciates the fact can we figure out together how to solve challenges.

Support the request for the council to agendize a public discussion or study session to discuss some options for updating the Marina Municipal Code that addresses noise. Agrees with the previous comments about the need to both protect residents from unreasonable noise and to support local businesses who need clear rules so that they can operate responsibly within those guidelines.

9. CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGE NCY: Background information has been provided to the Successor Agency of the former Redevelopment Agency on all matters listed under the Consent Agenda, and these items are considered to be routine and non -controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda are normally approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of the public or City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, the Council may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. If an item is pulled for discussion, it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency. 4 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Page 5

10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and non-controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda may be approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, Council may remove the item from the Consent Agenda and it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items.
a. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Accounts Payable Check Numbers 109169-109312, totaling $1,258,518.89 Accounts Payable Successor Agency EFT No. 144, totaling $584.80 b. MINUTES: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) April 21, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting
(2) May 5, 2026, Special City Council Meeting
c. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY:
(1) Staff recommend that the City Council reject the following claim and direct sending appropriate notice of rejection to claimant: Michael Jacquime Clark for a claim received on May 11, 2026.
d. AWARD OF BID: None
e. CALL FOR BIDS: None
f. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 202 6-49, establishing appropriations limit for FY 2026-27.
(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -50, receiving the Fiscal Year 2026 -27 Engineer's Report for the Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District; declaring its intention to levy an assessment in fiscal year 2026-27 in that district; and calling a public hearing for June 16, 2026.
(3) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -51, receiving the Fiscal Year 2026 -27 Engineer's Report for the Monterey Bay Estates Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Assessment District; declaring its intention to levy an assessment in fiscal year 2026 -27 in that district; and calling a public hearing for June 16, 2026.
(4) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -52, adopting a Vision Zero statement which would support roadway and safety goals and strengthen the City’s Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant application. g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026-53, approving an agreement between the City of Marina and the Transportation Agency of Monterey County (TAMC) for the 2023 Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) allocation of funding, and; approving the RSTP competitive funding grant application for EDC2126 The Downtown Vitalization and Implementation Projects.
5 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Page 6

(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -54, approving an agreement with ClientFirst Technology Consulting to provide bid assistance services for the Aquatic and Sports Center ; approving an agreement with ClientFirst Technology Consulting to provide a city -wide security assessment and plan; and approving an agreement with ClientFirst Technology Consulting to provide assistance with public safety camera placement and supporting infrastructure design at the new Dunes and Sea Haven Parks.
h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS:
(1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -55, accepting the dedication of Public Improvements as shown on the approved Dunes (Formerly University Village) Improvement Plans and Parcel Map for Phase 2 North (Formerly Opportunity Site 1A).
i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE):
(1) Receive Investment Reports for the City of Marina, City of Marina as Successor Agency to the Marina Redevelopment Agency, Preston Park Sustainable Community Non-Profit Corporation (PPSC-NPC), and Abrams B Non-Profit Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. (2) Receive the City of Marina Third Quarter Budget Report – Fiscal Year 2025-26, which represents the quarter ended March 31, 2026; and consider receiving the HdL City of Marina Sales Tax Update for the period from October – December 2025.
(3) Receive the Abrams Park and Preston Park Third Quarter Informational Report for Fiscal Year 2025 -26, which represents the quarter ended March 31, 2026.
(4) Receive Monterey -Salinas Transit May 11, 2026 , Board Meeting Highlights.
k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS: None
l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING):
(1) Read by Title Only and consider adopting Ordinance No. 2026 -05, approving the proposed amendments to Section 17.42.170 Short -Term Rentals (STR) of the Marina Municipal Code; and find that adoption of the ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS: None
Councilmember McCarthy requested to pull agenda item 10l(1) for abstention/ DELGADO/BIALA: TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA MINUS 10l(1) . 4 -0-0-0 Motion Passes
DELGADO/MCADAMS: TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 10l(1) . 3 -0-0-1(McCarthy) Motion Passes
6 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Page 7

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS: In the Council’s discretion, the applicant/proponent of an item may be given up to ten (10) minutes to speak. All other persons may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak on the matter.
a. Conduct a public hearing on the proposed extension of Urgency Ordinance No. 2026-03, as required by Government Code sections 65858(a) and 65090; and adopt an ordinance extending the temporary moratorium on the establishment and operation of new short -term rentals for twenty -six (26) days, from May 22, 2026, through and including June 17, 2026, by a minimum 4/5 vote as required by Government Code section 65858(a).

Public Comments:
• Adam Pinterit s there's a variety of reasons why someone may opt to rent on a short -term basis rather than on a permanent basis and urge the council to keep in mind that STRs are not strictly a competition for our permanent resident housing, but rather something that complements our TOT and Visitor Serving Economy.

BIALA/MCADAMS: TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXTENSION OF URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 2026 -03, AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65858(A) AND 65090; AND ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE

ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF NEW SHORT -TERM RENTALS FOR TWENTY-SIX (26) DAYS, FROM MAY 22, 2026, THROUGH AND INCLUDING JUNE 17, 2026, BY A MINIMUM 4/5 VOTE AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858(A). 4-0-0-0 Motion Passes by Roll Call Vote

b. Open a public hearing and consider adopting Resolution 2026 - approving a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of 44 trees and approval of a Design Review Permit in support of a new car dealership on the property located at 2101 First Avenue (Opportunity Area 3.2 of the Dunes Development); and find that any environmental impacts from the recommended action have been previously reviewed in the environmental impact report for the University Village Specific Plan EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167).

Public Comments:
• Adam Pinterits wanted to congratulate the applicants on a well put together package and seeming to work well together with the city and what it needs in terms of diverse economic development. If we can so readily examine our tree ordinance, you all should be aware that other cities would be envious of this. I think serves as a great example not just for this development, but for all developments, and not just for the sake of development, but as you're, of course, aware, for the sake of insurance, which affects everyone from commercial to residential.

Council discussed the Nexus Nolan test, monument sign size, computer simulation of Highway One view, carwash, idling and paging noise, parameter lighting, branding, trees on property and along highway side of fence, vehicle deliveries.

7 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Page 8

DELGADO/BIALA: THAT (1) THIS COMES BACK TO US WITH SOME DEFINITION OF WHAT SPECIAL EVENTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CAN HAPPEN; (2) WE GET OBJECTIVE STANDARDS FOR LIGHTING AND NOISE; (3) WE GET SOME

DETAIL ON THE SIGN MONUMENT, PARTICULARLY SQUARE FOOTAGE, COMPARED TO WHAT'S IN TEMECULA; AND (4) THAT WE HAVE A REAL

COMPUTER SIMULATION OF THE TYPE THAT TAMC DOES FOR

TRANSPORTATION PROJECT, WHERE YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IT'S

GOING TO LOOK LIKE

Note: No additional major projects or programs should be undertaken without review of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006). a. Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -56, awarding the Construction Manager -At- Risk contract for the Marina Recreation and Aquatic Center to the highest ranked proposer, Otto Construction, Inc., of Monterey, CA.

Public Comments:
• Jesus Vega, North Coast States Carpenters Local Union 646 . Thanked the city of Marina for potentially awarding the Construction Manager at Risk for the Marina Recreation Aquatic Center project to a responsible contractor, Otto Construction, which is committed to delivering quality work with skilled professionals . The North Coast States Carpenters Union looks forward to growing partnership with the city of Marina.

Council discussed labor standard in process, 5% contingency , labor standards being a part of the scoring process, subcontractor compliance with labor standards, MCCARTHY/BIALA: TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026 -56, AWARDING THE

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER -AT-RISK CONTRACT FOR THE MARINA

RECREATION AND AQUATIC CENTER TO THE HIGHEST RANKED PROPOSER, OTTO CONSTRUCTION, INC., OF MONTEREY, CA. 4-0-0-0 Motion Passes

b. Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -57, approving the Fiscal Year 2026 -27 mid - cycle budget adjustments as outlined in the staff report, and provide direction for any other Council desired adjustments, and authorizing the Finance Director to make all necessary accounting and budgetary entries.

Public Comments:
• Erika Graham commented on the slide regarding Preston Park Reserve, wanted to make sure it included the funding for the maintenance of the fields, and also the expansion that was mentioned previously, is the city going to continue with that mixed, baseball, softball -soccer field expansion, or if, we have changed it.
8 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Page 9

Council discussed funding for Marina Equestrian Center, ballfields, Dunes Park. building fund, moving $2.1 million Preston Park in building fund. New hotel construction schedule, TOT funds, sidewalk shaving costs,
MCADAMS/MCCARTHY: TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-57, APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026 -27 MID -CYCLE BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS AS OUTLINED IN

THE STAFF REPORT, AND PROVIDE DIRECTION FOR ANY OTHER COUNCIL

DESIRED ADJUSTMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY ENTRIES . 4-0-0-0 Motion Passes

c. Receive a presentation on past amendments to the Council Rules, (2) further amendments and refinements to such Rules; and (3) providing direction to City Attorney and Staff on other refinements or amendments to such Rules .

Continued from May 5, 2026
d. Sign Ordinance -Window Covering Update and possible council direction.

Continued from May 5, 2026
Public Comments:
• Osh asked the Council to consider reasonable exception based on the type of business . The grocery stores, like mine, the setup is very different from other businesses . propose a practical solutions allowing grocery stores to cover up to 100% of the windows where shelves are directly behind them . Supportive of keeping the front -facing windows clear and open without signage
• Denise Turley impressed that window signage has been removed and you can actually look into the store. As a consumer wanting to go into a business with its windows covered , it makes me a little wary. People need to feel safe and to be able to see out the windows.

Council discussed planning commission desire to regulate signs to 10% coverage. about a carve- out for HIPA A-type services. Possible grant program to assist in new sign costs. Enforcement

14. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council reports on meetings and conferences attended ( Gov’t Code Section 53232).

15. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 11:25 P.M.

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
ATTEST:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
9 Agenda Item: 10b(2)
City Council Mee
ting of
June 16, 2026
ACTION

MINUTES
Tuesday, June 2, 2026 5:00 P.M. Closed Session
6:30 P.M. Open Session

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL, AIRPORT COMMISSION,

MARINA ABRAMS B NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PRESTON PARK

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR

AGENCY OF THE FORMER MARINA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).

Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
AND
Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556

1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:00 P.M.

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM: (City Council, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonprofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Members and Marina Groundwater Sustainability Agency) MEMBERS PRESENT: Jenny McAdams, Brian McCarthy, Kathy Biala, Mayor Pro- Tem/Vice Chair Liesbeth Visscher, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None

4. CLOSED SESSION:
a. Conference with Legal Counsel, Anticipated Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)(4)), 1 potential case. City Council to consider initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(4). b. Conference with Legal Counsel: Existing Litigation (Govt. Code § 54956.9(d)(1)), 2 cases
i. Lazy Wheel MHP 101 LLC, et al. v. City of Marina, et al., 26CV002531, Monterey County Superior Court
ii. CEMEX - Consent Settlement Agreement and Cease and Desist Order, CCC- 17-CD-02, California Coastal Commission
c. Public Employment Appointment (Govt. Code §54957(b)) Position: City Manager
1 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 2

d. Real Property Negotiation (Govt. Code Section 54956.8) i. Property: Portion of APN No. 031-101-034
Negotiating Party: Board of Trustees of The California State University Negotiator(s): City Manager
Terms: Price and Terms
6:43 PM - RECONVENE OPEN SESSION AND REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN

CLOSED SESSION

5. MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Please stand)

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. LGBTQ+ Pride Month Proclamation
b. CSUMB SHTM Program Presentation on Gateway Hub Project.

7. COUNCIL AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS:
• Interim Fire Chief Sweeney announced the launch of the 9-1-1 Nurse Navigation Program. • Recreation Director Crisante announced the Grand Reopening Celebration of Glor ya Jean Tate Park on Saturday, June 6 from 11 a.m. - 1 p.m.

8. PUBLIC COMMENT: Any member of the public may comment on any matter within the City Council’s jurisdiction that is not on the agenda. This is the appropriate place to comment on items on the Consent Agenda. Action will not be taken on items not on the agenda. Comments are limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. General public comment may be limited to thirty (30) minutes and/or continued to the end of the agenda. Any member of the public may comment on any matter listed on this agenda at the time the matter is being considered by the City Council. Whenever possible, written correspondence should be submitted to the Council in advance of the meeting, to provide adequate time for its consideration.
• Denise Turley asked to provide clear directions about what exactly we do on a holiday weekend when they forget our trash . Asked if an update would be given now that school's out on any issues, anything that will change i.e... food banks, that kind of thing. • Grace Silva-Santella spoke about the accident at the roundabout at Del Monte and Beach Rd. and asked about the status of an agenda item whe re an evaluation was to be done on that roundabout to see what could be done to Slow down the traffic. • Nina Beety spoke about AT&T disconnecting local landline telephone services and ending lifeline service and other obligations they ’re required. Asked the city to tak e action to stop this. Noted Copper Line landlines are an essential infrastructure and built to work even in extended power outages and in most disasters. AT&T filed multiple petitions May 20th to the FCC to eliminate landlines and lifelines in areas of California, including the Monterey Peninsula and Salinas These petitions will be automatically granted by the FCC if there is no opposition.

items under the Consent Agenda are normally approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of the public or City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, the Council may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for individual consideration. If an item is pulled for discussion, it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items Successor Agency to the former Marina Redevelopment Agency.

10. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and non-controversial. All items under the Consent Agenda may be approved by one motion. Prior to such a motion being made, any member of City Council may ask a question or make a comment about an agenda item and staff may provide a response. If discussion or a lengthy explanation is required, Council may remove the item from the Consent Agenda and it will be placed at the end of Other Action Items.
a. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Accounts Payable Check Numbers 109313-109381, totaling $1,585,429.60 b. MINUTES: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) May 5, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting
c. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: None
d. AWARD OF BID: None
e. CALL FOR BIDS:
(1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -58, approving advertising and call for bids for the Del Monte Boulevard and Beach Road Intersection Improvements Project.
(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -59, approving advertising and a call for bids for the construction of the Windy Hill Park Restroom Improvements Project.
f. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 202 6-60, approving a request by Marina Station Phases 1 and 2, LLC., to release a portion of the performance security for public improvements in the Marina Station Phases 1 and 2 area in the amount of $ 11,349,900; and accepting a substitute performance bond security of $ 1,261,100 for the remaining punch list items.
(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -61, denying the request submitted by Kris Cameron on behalf of the Fogtown Family Car Club to use the City of Marina logo.
(3) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -62, a ccepting the rehabilitation of the Marina Arts Village and the completion of the Arts District Stabilization Project; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion with the Monterey County Recorder’s Office.
g. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS: (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378) (1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -63, approving the Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants between the City of Marina and Interim, Inc. for the Marina Kai development. 3 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 4

(2) Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -64, approving FY 2026 -2027 amendments to Exhibits A and B of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between ReGen Monterey and its member agencies regarding compliance with SB 1383.
h. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS:
(1) Adopting Resolution No. 2026-65, authorizing the City Manager or his designee to accept a deed for the conveyance of the extension of 2 nd Avenue; and described therein, from Shea Homes Limited Partnership to the City of Marina and to take all other actions necessary to accept and record said deed on behalf of the City of Marina.
i. MAPS: None
j. REPORTS: (RECEIVE AND FILE): None
k. FUNDING & BUDGET MATTERS: None
l. APPROVE ORDINANCES (WAIVE SECOND READING): None
m. APPROVE APPOINTMENTS: None
Mayor Delgado pulled agenda item 10e(1) for brief question to consultant and made comments on agenda items 10f(2) and 10g(2).

Councilmember McAdams commented on agenda item 10e(2).

Councilmember McCarthy commented on agenda item 10f(2) and 10g(2) DELGADO/BIALA: TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA MINUS 10e(1) . 5-0-0-0 Motion Passes
10e(1)
Public Work s Direc tor Hernandez stated that the biggest issue with that roundabout is northbound traffic going too fast. no vegetation in the middle of that roundabout . This project is going to change the striping for people going northbound and will merge the lanes sooner. We're planning a lot of vegetation in the center of that so that you can no longer see traffic around you, which forces you to slow down.

DELGADO/VISSCHER: TO APPROVE ADVERTISING AND CALL FOR BIDS FOR

THE DEL MONTE BOULEVARD AND BEACH ROAD INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. 5-0-0-0 Motion Passes

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS: In the Council’s discretion, the applicant/proponent of an item may be given up to ten (10) minutes to speak. All other persons may be given up to three (3) minutes to speak on the matter.
a. Open a Public Hearing and consider adopting Resolution No. 2026 -66, approving a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of 44 trees and approval of a Design Review Permit in support of a new car dealership on the property located at 2101 First Avenue (Opportunity Area 3.2 of the Dunes Development); and find that any environmental impacts from the recommended action have been previously reviewed in the environmental impact report for the University Village Specific Plan EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167).

4 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 5

Public Comments:
• Glenn Woodson commented that City of Monterey is also holding a meeting tonight and public comme nts related to their $10 million defici t and the loss of Mercedes to Marina.

Marina does not have a deficit, and Mercedes will provide Marina with $2 million potentially in tax revenue every year . Commented about the trees on proponents’ side and the trees on Caltrans right-of-way.

Council discussed allowed sign sizes, branding, CalTran’s trees along Highway side of property, 3000 Kelvin lighting versus 4000 Kelvin lighting, security lighting, noise decibel level, silent paging system, portable hand vacuums and delivery truck route.

DELGADO/BIALA: THAT WE OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BASED ON

FINDINGS, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, AND THE CEQA DETERMINATION REFERENCED HERETO DETERMINE:

1. FIND THAT ANY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM THE

RECOMMENDED ACTION HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED IN THE

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE UNIVERSITY VILLAGE
SPECIFIC PLAN EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167).

2. APPROVE THE REMOVAL OF FORTY -FOUR (44) TREES SUBJECT TO CHAPTER 17.62 OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE

UNIVERSITY VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN TREE REPLACEMENT
STANDARDS.

3. DIRECT THE APPLICANT (UNSTOPPABLE GROUP) TO REPLANT
REPLACEMENT TREES AT A 2:1 RATIO FOR EVERY TREE THAT IS

REMOVED THAT ARE IN FAIR OR GOOD CONDITION WHICH INCLUDE TWENTY-TWO (22) TREES.

4. REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS OF

APPROVAL AND THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE ARBORIST
REPORTS SUBMITTED BY DENISE DUFFY AND ASSOCIATES ON APRIL 18, 2025, MAY 12, 2025, AND FEBRUARY 2026, INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE INTO THIS RESOLUTION.

5. REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO RETAIN TREES #712 AND #752 TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE. IF SAID TREES CANNOT BE RETAINED THE

APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION FOR REVIEW BY THE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AS TO WHY REMOVAL IS
REQUIRED.

6. INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE THE RECITALS LISTED ABOVE, THE

STAFF REPORT ACCOMPANYING THIS RESOLUTION, AND THE PROJECT

REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS IDENTIFIED IN THIS
PRESENTATION AS PRESENTED AT THE MAY 19, 2026 AND JUNE 2, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS. (ATTACHMENT B TO THIS RESOLUTION) . 4- 1(McCarthy)-0-0 Motion Passes

5 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 6

DELGADO/BIALA: THAT WE OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AND FIND THAT

ANY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM THE RECOMMENDED ACTION HAVE

BEEN PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE UNIVERSITY VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167).

1. INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE THE RECITALS LISTED ABOVE, THE

STAFF REPORT ACCOMPANYING THIS RESOLUTION, AND THE PROJECT

REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS IDENTIFIED IN THIS
PRESENTATION AS PRESENTED AT THE MAY 19, 2026 AND JUNE 2, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS. (ATTACHMENT B TO THIS RESOLUTION).

2. INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE THE RECITALS LISTED ABOVE.

3. APPROVE A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR A NEW CAR DEALERSHIP ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2101 FIRST AVENUE (OPPORTUNITY AREA

3.2 OF THE DUNES DEVELOPMENT), INCLUDING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT B.

4. REQUIRE THE APPLICANT (UNSTOPPABLE GROUP) TO COMPLY WITH

THE INCENTIVE AGREEMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PER CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS 2025-49 AND 2025-83.

5. REQUIRE THE APPLICANT (UNSTOPPABLE GROUP) TO FILE A MASTER

SIGN PROGRAM (MSP) FOR THE PROJECT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO OCCUPYING THE
BUILDING. SEPARATE FROM THE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM, PER THE

INCENTIVE PACKAGE, PRIOR TO OCCUPYING THE BUILDING THE CITY

COUNCIL SHALL RETAIN DESIGN APPROVAL FOR THE MONUMENT
SIGN ON THE WESTERLY BORDER OF THE PROPERTY.

6. DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE AND SUBMIT A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION (NOE) TO THE COUNTY CLERK WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

7. INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE THE RECITALS LISTED ABOVE, THE STAFF REPORT ACCOMPANYING THIS RESOLUTION . 4-1(McCarthy)-0-0 Motion Passes

b. Open a public hearing and adopt City Council Resolution 2026-67, approving the appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of Conditional Use Permit CUP26-000002 to establish a drive -thru lane at the previously approved gas station, convenience store, and car wash located at the northwest corner of Del Monte Blvd/2nd Avenue and Imjin Parkway; and find that the project will not result in new significant environmental impacts or effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the University Village Specific Plan EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167).

Public Comments:
• Glenn Woodson spoke about the traffic pattern security and what it means , Planning Commission asked for a condition to be put on the development to have a traffic survey done after the first year.
• Cristina Medina Dirksen spoke in support of the application. Been watching that corner and am looking forward to having more options out there. Asked whether that intersection at any 6 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 7

point Caltrans will be improving? There was talk that it's on them to improve that bridge and the traffic flow, is that correct?
• Grace Silva-Santella mentioned the earlier presentation on what kind of community we want to be. Spoke about Central Marina and allowing drive -throughs at the corner of Reservation Road. Spoke abo ut the current traffic issues on Imjin Park way between the lig ht at 2 nd Ave and the entrances to Highway One.
• Surinder Rana this project was approved in 2023 with the condition that there will be a traffic circulations assessment even if the drive -through restaurant does not come up . The exit on Imjin is there and is associated with the approved project for the gas station.

Council discussed safety issues from exiting property directly onto Imjin Parkway versus exiting onto 2 nd Avenue. Traffic study request after one year as part of C ondition of Approval by Planning Commission. Responsibility for the bridge widening.

BIALA/VISSCHER: TO ADOP T RESOLUTION 2026 -67, APPROVING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP26-000002 TO ESTABLISH A DRIVE -THRU LANE AT THE PREVIOUSLY

APPROVED GAS STATION, CONVENIENCE STORE, AND CAR WASH LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DEL MONTE BLVD/2 ND AVENUE AND IMJIN PARKWAY; AND FIND THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN NEW

SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OR EFFECTS OR A SUBSTANTIAL

INCREASE IN THE SEVERITY OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED IN THE UNIVERSITY VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN EIR (EIR NO. 2004091167). 4-1(Delgado)-0-0 Motion Passes

Note: No additional major projects or programs should be undertaken without review of the impacts on existing priorities (Resolution No. 2006-79 – April 4, 2006). a. Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -68, approving the recommendation from ReGen Monterey’s Technical Advisory Committee Subgroup to initiate a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process for future solid waste, recycling, and organics collection services; and approving the Process Integrity Policy governing the procurement process.

Public Comments:
• Eileen Hu asked how did you pick the apartments that you talked t o, I would have loved to participate.
• Liz Hall , Public Sector Manager, Waste Management, spoke in support of the council moving forward with an RFP process for the city of Marina. 7 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 8

• Emily Hanson, representing Republic Services . ReGen has really positioned itself well and very strategically incorporated all of the public ownership of the facilities . in support of the council moving forward with an RFP process.
• Kelly Johanson, VP GreenWaste. Reminded everybody that there are four years left on the contract, and t hat the contract also allows for a five-year extension. Requested that the city consider the five -year option to extend the contrac t. Stated rate increases have never gone higher than the CPI.
• Nick Becker , GM Pebble Beach Community Service District and chair of the Technical Advisory Committee subgroup . The Subgroup was tasked with going out to gather the data and the information for you as council members to make an informed decision . We hired some of the best consultants in the industry to do that and had support from the ReGen staff, which are highly regarded throughout the state of California. We did an extensive public and industry engagement, which revealed that there’s a very competitive market out there . The RFP process is the way that we can assure that we're getting the best rates for our constituents.
• Kristen O`Hara , Communications Manager at Regen. Clarified their role in the process as simply the coordinator of the staff from the peninsula jurisdiction . We gathered the brightest minds together and essentially look at all the benefits of going in this direction or that direction. Thanked HF&H for their expertise in the industry. if you choose to go out to RFP You're going to be in really great hands no matter what is decided. • Denise Turley expressed what resi dents w ant from the trash haulers: on-time service , We expect a truck to come out if s ervice is interrupted, expect that when you tip the can, that the can be completely empty when it is returned to us. Prefers Green Waste as their hauler.

MCADAMS/MCCARTHY: TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-68, APPROVING THE RECOMMENDATION FROM REGEN MONTEREY’S TECHNICAL ADVISORY

COMMITTEE SUBGROUP TO INITIATE A COMPETITIVE REQUEST FOR

PROPOSALS (RFP) PROCESS FOR FUTURE SOLID WASTE, RECYCLING, AND ORGANICS COLLECTION SERVICES; AND APPROVING THE PROCESS INTEGRITY POLICY GOVERNING THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS . 5-0-0-0 Motion Passes
b. Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -69, amending the rate adjustment calculation of the franchise agreement with GreenWaste Recovery utilizing a sector specific uniform percentage adjustment and approving maximum rates to be charged by GreenWaste Recovery effective July 1, 2026, for collection of franchised solid waste, recycling, and organics.

Public Comments:
• Eileen Hu expressed her concerns regarding the trash rates for people living in apartments .

Believes in the recycling bins but apartment residents should not have to pay extra for the m.

Prior to 2014, the recycling was included for apartment dwellers . Santa Cruz County residents both single-family homes and apartment dwellers pay the same fees. • Denise Turley noted that the cost for apartments is more because there are more times the trash is collected during the week versus once a week for single-family homes.

Council discussed inequity of fees for single-family dwellings versus multi-family/apartments, low-income CARE discounts for apartment dwellers.
8 MINUTES for City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Page 9

DELGADO/MCCARTHY: TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026 -69, AMENDING THE

RATE ADJUSTMENT CALCULATION OF THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH

GREENWASTE RECOVERY UTILIZING A SECTOR SPECIFIC UNIFORM

PERCENTAGE ADJUSTMENT AND APPROVING MAXIMUM RATES TO BE CHARGED BY GREENWASTE RECOVERY EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2026, FOR COLLECTION OF FRANCHISED SOLID WASTE, RECYCLING, AND ORGANICS . 5- 0-0-0 Motion Passes
c. Receive a presentation on past amendments to the Council Rules, (2) further amendments and refinements to such Rules; and (3) providing direction to City Attorney and Staff on other refinements or amendments to such Rules .

Continued from May 5 and 19, 2026 – Continued to June 16, 2026

14. COUNCIL & STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORTS:
a. Monterey County Mayor’s Association [Mayor Bruce Delgado] b. Council reports on meetings and conferences attended ( Gov’t Code Section 53232).

15. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 11:52 P.M.

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

ATTEST:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
9 Agenda Item: 10b(3)
City Council Meeting of
June 16, 2026

ACTION

MINUTES
Tuesday, June 9, 2026 2:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION
6:00 P.M OPEN SESSION

SPECIAL MEETING

CITY COUNCIL
THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AND VIRTUALLY (HYBRID).

Council Chambers
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California
AND
Zoom Meeting URL: https://zoom.us/j/730251556
Zoom Meeting Telephone Only Participation: 1-669-900-9128 - Webinar ID: 730 251 556

1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 2:00 P.M.

2. ROLL CALL & ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM: (City Council, Airport Commissioners, Marina Abrams B Non -Profit Corporation, Preston Park Sustainable Communities Nonprofit Corporation, Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency Members and Marina Groundwater Sustainability Agency) MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer McAdams, Brian McCarthy, Kathy Biala, Mayor Pro-Tem/Vice Chair Liesbeth Visscher, Mayor/Chair Bruce C. Delgado

3. OTHER ACTION:

Habitat Management Plan Compliance Project and City-Wide Incidental Take Permit for Monterey Gilia Project
Site Visit: 2:00 p.m.

1. Meet at City Council Chambers at 2:00 and leave for NW Corner a. Site Visit # 1 – NW Corner from 2:30 – 3:00

2. Leave NW Corner for Cypress Knolls at 3:00
a. Site Visit # 2 – Cypress Knolls from 3:15 – 3:30

3. Leave for Preston Park Ballfields at 3:30
a. Site Visit # 3 – Preston Park Ballfields from 3:45 – 4:00

4. Leave for Marina Municipal Airport at 4:00
a. Site Visit # 4 – Airport from 4:15 to 4:30.

5. Adjourn site visit and reconvene at Marina City Council Chambers at 6:00 Reconvene to City Council Chambers: 6:00 p.m.

1. Receive presentation from Denise Duffy and Associates and provide direction to staff.
1 Agenda for Special City Council Meeting of Tuesday, June 9, 2026 Page 2

Public Comments:
• Fred Watson, can we clarify that public use of the overgrown trails would be allowed , i n addition to some other trails that are not overgrown. Can we pave the overrun trails? If invasive removal is presumed, whether that be in the long -term management plan or elsewhere, can it be in writing? Suggested potential to expand the HMA . Asked that we put in writing that there will be a class one trail associated with the Del Monte extension now proposed on that western edge of Cypress Knolls.
• Grace Silva -Santella enjoyed the site visits. Commented on serving on the planning commission and chaired the General Plan Update for 2000 where 2nd Avenue extension was discussed how critical and important that habitat is for Sand Gilia. Felt that extension was essential to the survival of Central Marina as South Marina began to develop , does not feel that way now.
• Nikki Nedeff representing the Monterey Bay chapter of the California Native Plant Society .

CMPS wants the council to reduce the proposed development footprint that you have identified. You do not need to impact rare coastal resources in order to achieve both your housing and commercial development goals . Regarding the mitigation areas , presumably, there will be CDFW easements over the mitigation areas that are held by a qualified land trust and CMPS requests that the easements allow for some form of limited access For organized field trips.

Council discussed the northwest corner Habitat Management Area pathway/trail, Dadwal property violation area, exhaustion of existing mitigation areas, Salinas Avenue/Reservation Road site, Salinas Valley River habitat , land-use designation change, 2 nd Avenue trail to Patton Parkway not connecting to residential streets, 5.4-acre potential restoration area and the criteria used to create this trail, Smith's Blue Butterfly habitat.

MCCARTHY/MCADAMS: THE CITY COUNCIL PROVIDED INPUT SUPPORTING

THE CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR THE CITYWIDE INCIDENTAL

TAKE PERMIT AS PRESENTED BY STAFF, INCLUDING PROCEEDING WITHOUT

A TRAIL THROUGH THE NORTHWEST CORNER HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA

AND FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT STAFF MAY CONTINUE EV ALUATING

POTENTIAL MITIGATION OPPORTUNITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DADWAL

NOTICE OF VIOLATION, PROVIDE, HOWEVER, THAT ANY AGREEMENT,

COMPENSATION, EASEMENT, ACQUISITION OR OTHER COMMITMENT BY THE CITY WILL RETURN TO CITY COUNCIL AT ANOTHER TIME. 4 -1(DELGADO)-0-0

MOTION PASSES

4. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:27 P.M.

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
ATTEST:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
2 CITY OF MARINA

HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK DEPARTMENT
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, CA 93933
Phone: 831.884.1283
Fax: 831 384.0860 By

CLAIM FORM
This form is provided pursuant to Government Code Section 910.4 and shall be used by any person presenting a claim to the City of Marina under Government Code Section 810 et seq., except as provided in Government Code Sections 905 and 905.1. If additional space is needed for any of the required information, please attach additional sheets and note your name, date of claim and City of Marina.

SECTION 1: CLAIMANT INFORMATION
Jaylah Cortez Vallez
Name of Claimant e ep one um er inc uae area code)
Mailing Address City CA Zip Code
SECTION 2: NOTICES
The person presenting this claim desires that notices be sent to the following address:

Henry Gomez Parent/Guardian
Name of Claimant Telephone Number (include area code)
Mailing Address City CA Zip Code
SECTION 3: CLAIM INFORMATION
Date of the occurrence/transaction which gave rise to the claim: 04/15/2026 Month, Day & Year
Provide the location of the occurrence/transaction which gave rise to the claim. If applicable, include street address, city or county, highway number, mile post number and direction of travel.

On April 15th, 2D26, Claimant, was lawf1 illy present at or arrn md I os Arboles Middle School 294 Hillcrest Ave, Marina, CA 93933 Explain the circumstances of the occurrence or transaction which gave rise to the claim. State all facts that support your claim against the City of Marina and why you believe the City of Marina is responsible for the alleged damage or injury.

Claimant was attending class, when she encountered a dangerous condition in the form of another student using pepper spray on her within the classroom. As such, Claimant instantly dealt with facial burns that extended to her eyes Claimant is blind in one eye and her eye with vision remaining sustained injuries from this incident.

Provide a general description of the indebtedness, obligation, injury, damage or loss incurred so far as it may be known at the time of presentation of the claim.

As a result of the incident on April 15th, 2026, Claimant has sustained multiple and severe injuries.

Claimant has sustained general, special, actual, and compensatory damages, including but not limited ta necessary medical and related expenses past, present as well as mental, emotional and physical pain and suffering.

Agenda Item: 10c(1)
June 16, 2026

June 11, 2026 Agenda Item: 10f(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting of
of the Marina City Council June 16, 2026

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 26-,

ADOPTING A N UPDATED LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR
2026-27 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, adopting an updated list of projects for Fiscal Year 2026-27 funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.

BACKGROUND:

On April 28, 2017 the Governor signed Senate Bill 1 (Beall, Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), which is known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. To address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation and critical safety needs on both the state highway and local streets and road system, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1): increases per gallon fuel excise taxes; increases diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration fees; and provides for inflationary adjustments to tax rates in future years.

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 provides $5.2 billion annually and is a significant investment in California’s transportation infrastructure. Monterey County's share of the local streets and roads funding is approximately $22.4 million in fiscal year 2026/27.

Beginning November 1, 2017, the State Controller deposits various portions of this new funding into the newly created Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). A percentage of this new RMRA funding is apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and roads system.

Prior to receiving an apportionment of RMRA funds from the State Controller in a fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds. All projects proposed to receive funding must be adopted by resolution by the applicable city council or county board of supervisors at a regular public meeting. The list of projects must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement. This report is due to the California Transportation Commission by July 1st of each year.

In addition to the project list report, for each fiscal year in which RMRA funds are received and expended, cities and counties must submit documentation to the California Transportation Commission that details the expenditure of all RMRA funds, including a description and location of each completed project, the amount of funds expended on the project, the completion date, and the estimated useful life of the improvement. This report on expenditures is due to the California Transportation Commission by October 1st of each year.

ANALYSIS:

As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program’s annual street maintenance project budget, the City has developed a fiscal year project list that will utilize the RMRA funds to supplement the financing of project administration and construction. This project list is substantially consistent with funding appropriations previously approved by the Council for Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Annual Street Resurfacing . The City Council can add more streets to the proposed lists and/or additional budget at a later date.

The proposed list (“EXHIBIT A ”) is a representation of the City’s intent for roadway maintenance projects to the California Transportation Commission to fulfill its annual reporting requirements and can be amended after submission. This action only pertains to the proposed expenditure of RMRA funds for the fiscal year 202 6-2027. Once adopted, staff will enter the project list into the State SB1 Programs Project Intake website prior to the July 1st deadline.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Should the City Council approve this request, the entry of the City’s proposed project list will allow the City to receive an estimated $649,554 of SB 1 revenue. The submission of the project list is a declaration of intent to the California Transportation Commission that the City will dedicate the RMRA funds towards roadway maintenance.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Scott Shepard, P.E.

Engineering Division
Public Works Department

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA
ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017

WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and

WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and

WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $649,554 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB 1; and

WHEREAS, this is the tenth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and

WHEREAS, the City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list; and

WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high -priority and cost -effective projects that also meet the communities priorities for transportation investment; and

WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate 25 lane miles throughout the City this year and similar projects into the future; and

WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in an “at -lower-risk” condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a “good” condition; and

WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting -edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the City Council of the City of Marina, State of California, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

Resolution No. 2026-
Page Two

2. The following list of newly proposed projects will be funded in -part or solely with Fiscal Year 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Project Title: APR1801 Annual Street Resurfacing, Phase 1 Project Description: Phase 1 – Full Reconstruction & Overlay Project Location: Various Locations (see Exhibit A)
Estimated Project Schedule: Start (6/27) – Completion (12/27) based on the component being funded with RMRA funds
Estimated Project Useful Life: 25 years

3. The following previously proposed and adopted projects may also utilize Fiscal Year 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues in their delivery. With the relisting of these projects in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Project Title: APR1801 Annual Street Resurfacing, Phase 2 Project Description: Phase 2 – Full Reconstruction & Overlay Project Location: Various Locations (see Exhibit A)
Estimated Project Schedule: Start (11/26) – Completion (07/27) based on the component being funded with RMRA funds
Estimated Project Useful Life: 25 years

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina, State of California this 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

___________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

2" OVERLAY, RECONSTRUCTION, & CAPE SEAL STREETS186
CITY OF MARINABKF ENGINEERS307 MAIN STREETSUITE 120SALINAS, CA 93901(831) 205-5880www.bkf.comRevisions95% PLANSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONKEY MAP & QUANTITY SUMMARY TABLEKM-14 Phase 1 Locations
Phase 2 Locations
Exhibit A
APR1801 Full Reconstruction
Phase 1 and Phase 2 locations

June 8, 2026 Item No. 10g(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 16, 2026

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 26-, CALLING A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2026, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN CITY OFFICERS FROM COUNCIL DISTRICTS 1, DISTRICT 4 AND MAYOR (AT -LARGE); AND REQUESTING THAT

THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY AGREE TO CONSOLIDATION OF SAID ELECTION

WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SAID DATE, AND

REQUESTING THE COUNTY TO RENDER ANY AND ALL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH SAID CONSOLIDATED ELECTION; AUTHORIZING THE

FINANCE DIRECTOR TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS AND THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT , SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED

HERETO, FOR THE PROVISION OF ELECTION SERVICES WITH MONTEREY COUNTY, SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY CITY ATTORNEY.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 20 26-, calling for a general municipal election in the City of Marina on Tuesday, November 3, 20 26, for the election of certain city officers; and

2. Requesting the County of Monterey agree to the consolidation of the election with the statewide general election and requesting the County Elections Department to render any and all services required to conduct the election; and

3. Authorizing the Finance Director to appropriate funds and the City Manager to take all actions necessary to effectuate such election and to execute a service agreement for the provision of election services between the City of Marina and Monterey County Elections Department/Registrar of Voters subject to final review and approval by City Attorney.

BACKGROUND:

The terms of Mayor Bruce C. Delgado, Councilmember Brian McCarthy and Councilmember Liesbeth Visscher will expire as of November 20 26. On December 17, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance 2019 -04 amending Chapter 2.06 of the Marina Municipal Code entitled “Municipal Elections” to add Section 2.06.020 establishing a by-district electoral system for four City Council members, with the office of Mayor to continue to be separately elected.

ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to Elections Code (EC) Section 10002, the City may, by resolution, request the Board of Supervisors of the County to permit the County Elections Official to render specified services to the city or district relating to the conduct of an election.

Pursuant to EC Section12101 the first day for the City Council to call for an election and for the City Clerk to publish notice of the election, is June 29, 2026. 1 Pursuant to EC Section 10403 the last day for the City Council to file with the Elections Department a resolution requesting consolidation of an election for candidates or measures is August 7, 2026.

Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10400, whenever two or more elections, including bond elections, of any legislative or congressional district, public district, city, county, or other political subdivision are called to be held on the same day, in the same territory, or in territory that is in part the same, they may be consolidated upon the order of the governing body or bodies or officer or officers calling the elections.

Consistent with past practice, when the City’s election is consolidated and the County be requested to render specified services in connection with said consolidated election, the County requires a contract for any and all services. The form of a contract for the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election is attached as EXHIBIT A.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Should the City Council approve this request, adequate funding is included in the F Y 2025-26 and FY 2 6-27 Budgets, and will be charged to General Fund, City Administration, Elections, Account No. 11.112.65895. The County Elections Department has estimated the cost to the City for the consolidation of the November 3, 2026, election to be between $ 53,000.00 and $55,000.00.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for the City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Anita Sharp
Deputy City Clerk
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

_____________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

SOURCE OF FUNDING:

Should the City Council approve this request, adequate funding is included in the FY 20 25- 26 and FY 202 6-2027 Budgets and will be charged to General Fund, City Administration, Elections, Account No. 11.112.65895.

2 Resolution No. 2026- ____

RESOLUTION ORDERING A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION IN THE CITY OF

MARINA, REQUESTING THE COUNTY ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT THE

ELECTION, AND REQUESTING CONSOLIDATION OF THE ELECTION

City of Marina

WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10002, the governing body of any city or district may by resolution request the Board of Supervisors of the county to permit the county elections official to render specified services to the city or district relating to the conduct of an election; and

WHEREAS, the resolution of the governing body of the city or district shall specify the services requested; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10002, the city or district shall reimburse the county in full for the services performed upon presentation of a bill to the city or district; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10400, whenever two or more elections, including bond elections, of any legislative or congressional district, public district, city, county or other political subdivision are called to be held on the same day, in the same territory, or in territory that is in part the same, they may be consolidated upon the order of the governing body or bodies or officer or officers calling the elections; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10400, such election for cities and special districts may be either completely or partially consolidated; and

WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 2.06.010 of the Marina Municipal Code provide that the City of Marina’s General Municipal Election shall be held on the same day as the Statewide General Election on the first Tuesday following the first Monday of November in every even -numbered year and the City Council may submit to the voters at the election such questions and or propositions as may be timely submitted; and

WHEREAS, on December 17, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance 2019 -04 amending Chapter 2.06 of the Marina Municipal Code entitled “Municipal Elections” to add Section 2.06.020 establishing a by -district electoral system for four City Council members, with the office of Mayor to continue to be separately elected; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10403, whenever an election called by a district, city or other political subdivision for the submission of any question, proposition, or office to be filled is to be consolidated with a statewide election, and the question, proposition, or office to be filled is to appear upon the same ballot as that provided for that statewide election, the district, city or other political subdivision shall, at least 88 days prior to the date of the election, file with the board of supervisors, and a copy with the elections official, a resolution of its governing board requesting the consolidation, and setting forth the exact form of any question, proposition, or office to be voted upon at the election, as it is to appear on the ballot. Upon such request, the Board of Supervisors may order the consolidation; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 13307, whenever an election called by a district, city, or other political subdivision has offices to be filled, it is required to fix and determine the number of words that a candidate may submit on the candidate’s statement to be either 200 or 400 words and to determine if the candidate and or the political subdivision will pay the cost of the statement; and

WHEREAS, Elections Code Section 15651 requires the city or district to determine the means and manner in which a tie vote is to be resolved in the event that two or more persons receive an equal number of votes and the highest number of votes (“tie votes”) for an office to be voted upon; and

WHEREAS, the resolution requesting the consolidation shall be adopted and filed at the same time as the adoption of the ordinance, resolution, or order calling the election; and

WHEREAS, various district, county, state and other political subdivision elections may be or have been called to be held on November 3, 2026.
3 Resolution No. 2026-
Page Two

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the governing body of the City of Marina hereby orders an election be called and consolidated with any and all elections also called to be held on November 3, 2026, insofar as said elections are to be held in the same territory or in territory that is in part the same as the territory of the City of Marina, and the City of Marina requests the Board of Supervisors of the County of Monterey to order such consolidation under Elections Code Section 10401 and 10403.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that said governing body hereby requests the Board of Supervisors to permit the Monterey County Elections Department to provide any and all services necessary for conducting the election and agrees to pay for said services, and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Monterey County Elections Department conduct the election for the purpose of electing two Members to this Governing Board on the November 3, 2026, ballot:

SEATS OPEN OFFICE TERM

Bruce C. Delgado Mayor Full Term of Four Years
Brian McCarthy Councilmember - District 1 Full Term of Four Years Liesbeth Visscher Councilmember - District 4 Full Term of Four Years

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that pursuant to Election Code Section 13307 the City of Marina has resolved that all costs of the Candidate’s statement be paid by the Candidate and that no candidate may submit a statement of over 200 words.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that pursuant to Elections Code Section 15651(a), a tie vote shall be resolved by drawing lots.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that tie votes shall be determined by the City Council acting as the Election Board.

BE IT FU RTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that t he Deputy City Clerk is hereby designated as the Elections Officials and is directed to submit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the Board of Supervisors, to the Registrar of Voters and to the County Clerk of the County of Monterey. The Deputy City Clerk shall certify as to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Finance Director is authorized and directed to appropriate the necessary funds to pay for the cost of the election and the City Manager is authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate such election and to execute an agreement for the provision of election services between the City of Marina and Monterey County, subject to review and approval by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina on this 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTENTIONS: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

SIGNED:

__________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

Anita Shepherd-Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 EXHIBIT A
5 EXHIBIT A
6 EXHIBIT A
7 June 12, 2026 Item No. 10g(4)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 16, 2026

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 202 6-,
APPROVING THE 8th STREET EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF MARINA AND CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,
MONTEREY BAY (CSUMB), AND; ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF

OF CITY SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND, AUTHORIZING ALL OTHER ACTIONS

NECESSARY TO ACCEPT AND RECORD SAID EASEMENT
AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MARINA; AND,

AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD A CERTIFIED COPY

OF THE RESOLUTION IN THE MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE

COUNTY RECORDER

RECOMMENDATION:

It is requested that the City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 2026-,:

1. Approving the 8th Street Easement Agreement between the City of Marina and California State University, Monterey Bay (CSUMB), and;

2. Accepting and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney;

3. Authorizing all other actions necessary to accept and record said easement agreement on behalf of the City of Marina, and;

4. Authorizing the City Clerk to record a certified copy of the resolution in the Monterey County office of the County Recorder.

BACKGROUND:

At the regularly scheduled meeting of December 17, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019 -140, approving an Operating Agreement as an administrative amendment of the Development Agreement clarifying and modifying certain project approvals for Specific Plan for The Dunes on Monterey Bay including to the Conforming Clarifications to the Schedule of Performance.

At the regular meeting of February 2, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021 -06, approving the Residential Phase 2 East Final Map for The Dunes on Monterey Bay Development Project Subdivision. At the same meeting, City Council adopted Resolutio n No. 2021 -05, approving the Public Improvement Agreement for the residential public improvements. The public improvements did not include the extension of 8th Street from 3rd Avenue to California Avenue or the ultimate improvements to California Avenue from 8th Street to Imjin Parkway.

At the regular meeting of November 7, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-113, authorizing the City Manager to enter into two reimbursement/public improvement agreements for the right-of-way improvements for the segments of 8 th Street and California Avenue mentioned above.
1 ANALYSIS:

Shea Homes Limited Partnership (“Developer”) has submitted the 8th Street and California Avenue Improvement Plans to the City for review and approval. Staff has reviewed the improvement plans for construction and has found the plans to be in substantial conformance to City Standards, the Specific Plan requirements and Te ntative Map conditions as amended. In order to complete the ultimate right -of-way improvements along 8 th Street, additional right -of-way is needed within CSUMB’s property as shown in “EXHIBIT A ”. CSUMB has provided a draft easement agreement (“EXHIBIT B” ) that establishes the easement area required for the right of way improvements and maintenance responsibilities for those improvements. The Public Works Director, Community Development Director and City Manager will execute all necessary documents to establish the easement and execute the Agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Should the City Council approve this request, the City has negotiated an easement cost of $813,764 for the areas shown within Exhibit A. Continued maintenance of the public street , northern sidewalk (adjacent to Hilltop Park) , streetlights, and stormwater facilities shall be incorporated into the City’s Public Works Maintenance schedule and funded by the City’s General Fund maintenance budget for the different improvements. Maintenance of the southern multi -use pathway adjacent to CSUMB property shall be conducted and funded by CSUMB.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The approval and recordation of the 8 th Street Easement Agreement between the City of Marina and CSUMB was generally anticipated and analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project and certified by the City Council through its adoption of Council Resolution No. 2005-127 on May 31, 2005 (SCH # 2004091167).

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Edrie Delos Santos, P.E.

Engineering Division
Public Works Department

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

APPROVING THE 8th STREET EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CITY OF MARINA AND CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY (CSUMB), AND; ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF CITY

SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY; AND, AUTHORIZING ALL OTHER ACTIONS NECESSARY

TO ACCEPT AND RECORD SAID EASEMENT AGREEMENT ON BEHALF
OF THE CITY OF MARINA; AND, AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO

RECORD A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE RESOLUTION IN THE MONTEREY

COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of December 17, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2019-140, approving an Operating Agreement as an administrative amendment of the Development Agreement clarifying and modifying certain project approvals for Specific Plan for The Dunes on Monterey Bay including to the Conforming Clarifications to the Schedule of Performance.

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of February 2, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-06, approving the Residential Phase 2 East Final Map for The Dunes on Monterey Bay Development Project Subdivision. At the same meeting, City Council adopted Resolutio n No. 2021-05, approving the Public Improvement Agreement for the residential public improvements.

The public improvements did not include the extension of 8th Street from 3rd Avenue to California Avenue or the ultimate improvements to California Avenue from 8th Street to Imjin Parkway.

WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of November 7, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-113, authorizing the City Manager to enter into two reimbursement/public improvement agreements for the right -of-way improvements for the segments of 8 th Street and California Avenue mentioned above.

WHEREAS, Shea Homes Limited Partnership (“Developer”) has submitted the 8 th Street and California Avenue Improvement Plans to the City for review and approval. Staff has reviewed the improvement plans for construction and has found the plans to be in substantial conformance to City Standards, the Specific Plan requirements and Tentative Map conditions as amended. In order to complete the ultimate right -of-way improvements along 8 th Street, additional right -of-way is needed within CSUMB’s property as shown i n “Exhibit A” . CSUMB has provided a draft easement agreement (“Exhibit B”) that establishes the easement area required for the right of way improvements and maintenance responsibilities for those improvements. The Public Works Director, Community Development Director and City Manager will execute all necessary documents to establish the easement and execute the Agreement.

WHEREAS, should the City Council approve this request, the City has negotiated an easement cost of $813,764 for the areas shown within Exhibit A. Continued maintenance of the public street, northern sidewalk (adjacent to Hilltop Park), streetlights, and stormwater facilities shall be incorporated into the City’s Public Works Maintenance schedule and funded by the City’s General Fund maintenance budget for the different improvements. Maintenance of the southern multi -use pathway adjacent to CSUMB property shall be conducted and funded by CSUMB.

3 Resolution No. 2026-

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, the approval and recordation of the 8th Street Easement Agreement between the City of Marina and CSUMB was generally anticipated and analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project and certified by the City Council through its adoption of Council Resolution No. 2005-127 on May 31, 2005 (SCH # 2004091167).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Approve the 8th Street Easement Agreement between the City of Marina and California State University, Monterey Bay (CSUMB), and;

2. Accept and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney;

3. Authorize all other actions necessary to accept and record said easement agreement on behalf of the City of Marina, and;

4. Authorize the City Clerk to record a certified copy of the resolution in the Monterey County office of the County Recorder.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

___________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 HILLTOP PARK
CSUMB
STOP
STOP
STOP
8TH STREET SECTION WITH BIKE LANES
NORTH
(HILLTOP PARK)
SOUTH
(CSUMB)
NORTH
(HILLTOP PARK)
SOUTH
(CSUMB)
8TH STREET SECTION WITH PARKING

CITY OF MARINA, CALIFORNIA
PHASE 2 EAST - RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP

THE DUNES ON MONTEREY BAY
Sheet 2 of 2
Civil Engineering
Land Surveying
6 Harris Court
Monterey, California
831.649.5225
whitsonengineers.com August 13, 2025
Project No.:3140.30
8TH STREETLEGEND
CITY EASEMENT, 29,063 SF
CITY RIGHT OF WAY, 1,942 SF

TO BE DEDICATED IN SEPARATE

INSTRUMENT
CSUMB
Maintained
CSUMB
Maintained

EXHIBIT A TO STAFF REPORT
5 EXHIBIT “A”
SHEET 1 OF 2
Legal Desc-8th St-Parcel 5(1).docx

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT
Certain real property situate in the City of Marina, County of Monterey, State of California, described as follows:

Being a portion of that certain real property shown as Parcel 5 on that certain map filed for record in Volume 19 of Surveys at page 15 in the records of said County, more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at a point on the northerly boundary of said Parcel 5, said point also being the southwesterly corner of Parcel OS-2.3, as shown on that certain map filed for record in Volume 24 of Cities & Towns maps at page 73 in the records of said County; thence along said northerly boundary of Parcel 5
a) North 01°40'00" East, 19.79 feet; thence
b) Northerly 32.80 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of

58.00 feet, through a central angle of 32°24'07" to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said curve
1) Northwesterly 58.31 feet, through a central angle of 57°35'53"; thence 2) North 88°20'00" West, 273.55 feet; thence departing said northerly boundary 3) South 86°41'09" East, 190.76 feet; thence
4) Easterly 133.97 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 505.86 feet, through a central angle of 15°10'26" to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 1,876 square feet, more or less.

Attached hereto is a plat to accompany legal description, and by this reference made a part hereof.

END OF DESCRIPTION
PREPARED BY:

WHITSON ENGINEERS
______________________________________5/8/2026_
RICHARD P. WEBER P.L.S. DATE
L.S. NO. 8002
Job No.: 3140.30

EXHIBIT B TO

STAFF REPORT
6 ∆=
∆=
∆
PROJECT No.:

T:\Monterey Projects\3140\SURVEY\LEGAL DESC\8th Street\3140-8th Street-Plat.dwg Civil Engineering +
Land Surveying
6 Harris Court
Monterey, CA 93940
831.649.5225
whitsonengineers.com
3140.30

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION

CITY OF MARINA, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PARCEL 5, VOLUME 19, SURVEYS, PAGE 15
MAY 2026

RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF
EI N E
S
O
N
W
E
N
I T
H S
G R
7 EXHIBIT “B”
SHEET 1 OF 3
Legal Desc-8th St-Parcel 5(2).docx

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT

Certain real property situate in the City of Marina, County of Monterey, State of California, described as follows:

Beginning at a point on the northerly boundary of said Parcel 5, said point also being the most easterly corner of Parcel OS-2.3, as shown on that certain map filed for record in Volume 24 of Cities & Towns maps at page 73 in the records of said County; thence along said northerly boundary of Parcel 5

1) South 78°20'00" East, 110.24 feet; thence

2) Easterly 87.70 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 300.00 feet, through a central angle of 16°45'00"; thence

3) South 61°34'49" East, 217.94 feet to the most northerly corner of Parcel 5C, as shown on that certain map filed for record in Volume 27 of Surveys at page 151 in the Records of said County; thence along the westerly boundary of said Parcel 5C

4) South 02°20'00" West, 14.18 feet; thence departing said westerly boundary of Parcel 5C

5) North 56°50'19" West, 49.16 feet; thence

6) Northwesterly 147.55 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 562.00 feet, through a central angle of 15°02'35"; thence

7) Westerly 192.97 feet along the arc of a compound curve to the left having a radius of 962.00 feet, through a central angle of 11°29'35"; thence tangentially

8) North 83°22'30" West, 131.35 feet; thence

9) Westerly 123.80 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 649.00 feet, through a central angle of 10°55'47"; thence

10) Westerly 19.06 feet along a reverse curve to the left having a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 27°18'05"; thence

11) Westerly 21.43 feet along a reverse curve to the right having a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 30°41'59"; thence

8 EXHIBIT “B”
SHEET 2 OF 3

Legal Desc-8th St-Parcel 5(2).docx
12) Westerly 28.36 feet along the arc of a compound curve to the right having a radius of 659.00 feet through a central angle of 02°27'56" to a point on the southerly boundary of said Parcel OS-2.3; thence along said boundary of Parcel OS-2.3

13) South 89°30'00" East, 153.22 feet; thence

14) Easterly 146.17 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 750.00 feet, through a central angle of 11°10'00" to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 0.373 acres, more or less.

Attached hereto is a plat to accompany legal description, and by this reference made a part hereof.

END OF DESCRIPTION

PREPARED BY:

WHITSON ENGINEERS

______________________________________5/12/2026_
RICHARD P. WEBER P.L.S. DATE
L.S. NO. 8002
Job No.: 3140.30
9 ∆=
∆=
∆=
∆=
∆
∆
∆
∆=
PROJECT No.:

T:\Monterey Projects\3140\SURVEY\LEGAL DESC\8th Street\3140-8th Street-Plat.dwg Civil Engineering +
Land Surveying
6 Harris Court
Monterey, CA 93940
831.649.5225
whitsonengineers.com
3140.30

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION

CITY OF MARINA, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PARCEL 5, VOLUME 19, SURVEYS, PAGE 15
MAY 2026

RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF
EI N E
S
O
N
W
E
N
I T
H S
G R
10 EXHIBIT “C”
SHEET 1 OF 2
Legal Desc-8th St-Parcel 5C.docx

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT

Certain real property situate in the City of Marina, County of Monterey, State of California, described as follows:

Being a portion of that certain real property shown as Parcel 5C, as shown on that certain map filed for record in Volume 27 of Surveys at page 151 in the Records of said County, more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Parcel 5C; thence along the northeasterly boundary of said Parcel 5C

1) South 61°35'29" East, 82.34 feet; thence

2) South 56°50'19" East, 506.46 feet to the most easterly corner of said Parcel 5C; thence along the easterly boundary of said Parcel 5C

3) South 09°20'00" West, 20.77 feet; thence departing said easterly boundary

4) North 56°50'19" West, 589.64 feet to a point on the westerly boundary of said Parcel 5C; thence along said westerly boundary

5) North 02°20'00" East, 14.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 0.251 acres, more or less.

Attached hereto is a plat to accompany legal description, and by this reference made a part hereof.

END OF DESCRIPTION

PREPARED BY:

WHITSON ENGINEERS

______________________________________5/14/2026_
RICHARD P. WEBER P.L.S. DATE
L.S. NO. 8002
Job No.: 3140.30
11 PROJECT No.:

T:\Monterey Projects\3140\SURVEY\LEGAL DESC\8th Street\3140-8th Street-Plat.dwg Civil Engineering +
Land Surveying
6 Harris Court
Monterey, CA 93940
831.649.5225
whitsonengineers.com
3140.30

PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION

CITY OF MARINA, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PARCEL 5C, VOLUME 27, SURVEYS, PAGE 151
MAY 2026

RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF
EI N E
S
O
N
W
E
N
I TH S
G R
12 June 9, 2026 Item No. 10g(3)
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 16, 2026
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2026 -,

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A REFUND

SERVICES ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH MG ENVIRONMENTAL,

LLC TO PURSUE POTENTIAL REIMBURSEMENT OF HAZARDOUS

WASTE DISPOSAL FEES, SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL

BY THE CITY ATTORNEY
REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -___ authorizing the City Manager to execute a Refund Services Engagement Agreement with MG Environmental, LLC to pursue potential refunds and reimbursements related to hazardous waste disposal fees and environmental regulatory charges on behalf of the City of Marina, subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND:

The City conducts blight abatement and cleanup throughout the community. Some of these projects require the removal and disposal of hazardous materials, resulting in disposal fees and related charges paid by the City.

MG Environmental, LLC specializes in identifying and recovering eligible reimbursements associated with hazardous waste disposal fees and environmental regulatory charges. The firm has contacted the City regarding a potential opportunity to recover fees pa id in connection with hazardous waste disposal activities occurring between 2021 and 2024.

Under the proposed Refund Services Engagement Agreement, MG Environmental would act as the City's authorized representative to review records, obtain disposal documentation, communicate with regulatory agencies, prepare and submit reimbursement claims, and pursue any eligible refunds or reimbursements on behalf of the City.

The agreement establishes an initial term of eighteen (18) months with automatic annual renewals unless terminated by either party. Compensation is based solely on a contingency fee equal to twenty-two percent (22%) of any reimbursement or refund successfu lly recovered. If no reimbursement is obtained, the City incurs no cost for MG Environmental's services.

ANALYSIS:

MG Environmental has indicated that government agencies may be eligible to recover certain hazardous waste disposal fees that were paid in connection with public projects and cleanup activities. Based on preliminary discussions with the firm, hazardous waste generated during City blight abatement and cleanup operations conducted between 2021 and 2024 may qualify for reimbursement.
1 The proposed agreement would authorize MG Environmental to review historical disposal records, manifests, hazardous waste profiles, and related documentation necessary to determine eligibility and pursue reimbursement claims. The agreement also includes an authorization allowing MG Environmental to obtain relevant records from treatment, storage, and disposal facilities used by the City.

Staff believes the contingency -based structure minimizes financial risk to the City because compensation is only due if funds are successfully recovered. The City is not responsible for MG Environmental's costs associated with investigating or pursuing claims, and there is no obligation to pay any fee unless a reimbursement is obtained.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no upfront fiscal impact associated with the proposed agreement. Compensation to MG Environmental would only be paid if a refund is successfully recovered on behalf of the City.

Under the agreement, MG Environmental would receive twenty-two percent (22%) of any refund obtained, with the remaining balance retained by the City.

Because the amount of any potential refund is currently unknown, the fiscal benefit to the City cannot be determined at this time.

CONCLUSION:

The proposed agreement provides a no -upfront-cost opportunity for the City to pursue potential reimbursements related to hazardous waste disposal fees and environmental regulatory charges that may be owed to the City. Approval of the agreement would author ize MG Environmental to investigate and pursue eligible reimbursement and refund claims on the City's behalf.

Respectfully submitted,

Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

EXHIBITS:

Exhibit A - Refund Services Engagement Agreement between the City of Marina and MG Environmental, LLC

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A REFUND SERVICES

ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH MG ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC TO PURSUE

POTENTIAL REIMBURSEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL FEES ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MARINA

WHEREAS, the City of Marina periodically conducts blight abatement, cleanup, and other public works activities that may require the handling, transportation, and disposal of hazardous materials; and

WHEREAS, the City has incurred hazardous waste disposal fees and related charges associated with such activities; and

WHEREAS, MG Environmental, LLC has identified a potential opportunity for the City to recover certain hazardous waste disposal fees and related charges paid between 2021 and 2024; and

WHEREAS, MG Environmental, LLC specializes in identifying and pursuing reimbursement opportunities associated with hazardous waste disposal fees and environmental regulatory charges; and

WHEREAS, under the proposed Refund Services Engagement Agreement, MG Environmental, LLC would act as the City's authorized representative to review records, obtain documentation, communicate with regulatory agencies, prepare and submit reimbursement claims, and pursue any eligible refunds on behalf of the City; and

WHEREAS, the proposed agreement provides for compensation to MG Environmental, LLC solely on a contingency basis equal to twenty -two percent (22%) of any reimbursement or refund successfully recovered, with no upfront cost to the City; and

WHEREAS, if no reimbursement or refund is recovered, the City shall have no obligation to compensate MG Environmental, LLC for its services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the Refund Services Engagement Agreement with MG Environmental, LLC, in substantially the form presented to the City Council, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, and to take all actions necessary to implement the agreement.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, duly held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
3 Exhibit A

Refund Services Engagement Agreement between the City of Marina and MG Environmental, LL
4 MG Environmental LLC.

REFUND SERVICES ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT

1. Exclusive Engagement for Services . Exclusive Engagement for Services. The undersigned client CITY OF MARINA (the “Client”) in consideration of services to be rendered by MG Environmental, LLC (the “Company”), hereby engages the Company to represent them in pursuit of reimbursement of potent ial fee overpayments made to the CDTFA for filed returns 2021-2024 that may be improperly held by the State of California (a “Refund”) that Client may be entitled to have refunded to Client. Client engages the Company as the Client’s exclusive agent to obt ain the Refunds which Company is pursuing and agrees to refer to Company any and all correspondence, notices, documents and to otherwise cooperate with Company in obtaining the Refunds. In no event shall Company be obligated to pursue any amounts owed to C lient from the State of California outstanding for more than 3 years or otherwise owed to Client and unrelated to the Refunds which Company is pursuing. Company agrees to diligently pursue the issuance of Client’s Refund(s) pursuant to the terms and condit ions of this Agreement.

2. Agency. Client authorizes and empowers the Company, on behalf of and as agent for Client, to take all steps deemed necessary, in the sole discretion of Company, to secure Refund(s). Company shall have the power to conduct the following on behalf of Client (i) ob tain and prepare and file documents, notices, or appeals; (ii) communicate with governmental authorities; (iii) obtain and submit supplemental information; (iv) attend hearings or meetings; (v) assist Client in negotiating settlements or refunds; and (vi) any other act expressly authorized by Client in writing.

3. Term and Termination. Client acknowledges the reoccurring possibility that a Refund may be available to Client. As a result, Company may, from time to time, notify Client of Company’s determination that an additional Refund may be owed. Accordingly, the term of this agreement shall be for an initial term of 18 months after the Effective Date and shall automatically renew for successive one (1) year terms unless terminated pursuant to this Section 3. Client may terminate this Agreement effective as of the da te that is the later of (i) thirty (30) days after written notice of intent to terminate is delivered to Company or (ii) conclusion of Company’s pending proceedings for a Refund or Refunds, which shall be deemed concluded upon Client’s receipt of a Refund and payment of the Contingency Fee (defined below) or upon Company’s determination that a Refund(s) is not obtainable or otherwise owed. Company may terminate this Agreement at any time upon written notice to Client.

4. Compensation for Services . For Company’s services, Client agrees to pay Company a contingency fee in an amount equal to twenty -two percent (22%) of a Refund (the “Contingency Fee”). The Contingency Fee shall be payable if the notice of determination issued by the State of California or other confirmation of issuance of the Refund is issued during the Term even if the Refund is actually received after expiration of the Term for any reason. The Contingency Fee shall be computed without deduction for additio n to any out -of-pocket costs and expenses Company incurs on Client’s behalf in connection with its services. Client agrees to remit payment for the Contingency Fee to Company no later than five (5) business days after its receipt of the Refund. Any unpaid Contingency Fee shall be subject to a monthly finance charge of one and one -half percent (1.5%) per month until Company receives full payment of the Contingency Fee. Company shall be solely responsible for all out -of-pocket expenses and costs associated wi th obtaining the Refund and Client shall have no obligation to reimburse Company for such costs and expenses, regardless of whether a Refund is obtained. The provisions of this Section 4 shall survive termination of this Agreement.

5. Notice and Communication. Client understands that the primary mechanism for communication between Client and Company will be through e -mail, including the sending of potentially time -sensitive document requests, however periodic phone calls may be necessary to expedite communication of necessary information. Client will provide Company with a primary point of contact for all correspondence related to Company’s services. Client is responsible for monitoring and responding to emails and phone calls from Company in a timely manner and agrees to provide all requested information or approvals on a timely basis. Client will ensure that any emails from the Company’s CFO, [email protected] email address are received and reviewed by Client. All notices required by this Agreement shall be sent by email and deemed received on the date of delivery.

5 MG Environmental LLC.

6. Client Acknowledgement . Client agrees and acknowledges that a Refund is in no way guaranteed and Company expressly disclaims any liability for failure to obtain a Refund. Client expressly acknowledges that Company has made no representation or warranty regarding its ability to secure a Refund regardless of amount, or any representation or warranty regarding the time in which a Refund may be obtained. Nonetheless, Company has performed preliminary research and believes that there is substantial likelihood that a Refund can be obtained.

7. Miscellaneous. Except as may be specifically required by law, Client will not disclose or communicate any part of this Agreement to any other person. No waiver of any part of this Agreement will be effective unless it is in writing, and no such waiver will be construed to be a waiver of any other breach of this Agreement. In the event either party commences an action or proceeding against the other party to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the non -prevailing party shall pay the attorneys’ fees and c osts incurred by the prevailing party in connection with such action. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California in accordance with the terms of the American Arbitration Association. Any dispute under this Agreement shall be re solved by binding arbitration conducted by the American Arbitration Association located in Sacramento, California. Any unlawful provision of the Agreement shall be severable. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties and replaces any and all prior agreements concerning the subjects addressed herein. In deciding to sign this Agreement, neither party has relied on any express or implied promise, statement, or representation of the other party, whether oral or written, except as set forth h erein. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date this Agreement is executed by Client. This Agreement may be executed via DocuSign ® or other electronic means in counterparts and an electronic or .pdf copy shall be deemed original. Counterparts transmitted by email or other electronic means shall have the same force and effect as an original counterpart.

The parties have executed this Refund Services Engagement Agreement effective as of the date below.

Upon execution of this Agreement, please return a signed copy to Company at: [email protected]

COMPANY:

MG Environmental, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By:________________________________________
__________
Name: Arthur McManus

Its: CFO

CLIENT:

Company Name: ____________________________

Signature: ________________________________

Printed Name: ____________________________

Title: ________________________________

Effective Date: ______________________________

6 MG Environmental LLC.

X
X
X
X
X
X

Declaration of “Authorized Representative”

By signing this document below, I hereby authorize MG ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC to act as my “authorized representative” on behalf of CITY OF MARINA to obtain the following documents from any Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility used by CITY OF MARINA.

Shipping Documents, including manifests and any pertinent associated documents including, but not limited to:
• Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
• Hazardous waste profiles
• Analytical data related to the generation and disposal of hazardous waste.

I hereby certify that I have authority to execute this letter designating MG Environmental, LLC to act as my Authorized Representative.

Signature Title

Printed Name Date

7 June 12, 2026 Item No. 10g(4)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 16, 2026

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 202 6-,
APPROVING THE 8th STREET EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF MARINA AND CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,
MONTEREY BAY (CSUMB), AND; ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF

OF CITY SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND, AUTHORIZING ALL OTHER ACTIONS

NECESSARY TO ACCEPT AND RECORD SAID EASEMENT
AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MARINA; AND,

AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO RECORD A CERTIFIED COPY

OF THE RESOLUTION IN THE MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE

COUNTY RECORDER

RECOMMENDATION:

It is requested that the City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 2026-,:

1. Approving the 8th Street Easement Agreement between the City of Marina and California State University, Monterey Bay (CSUMB), and;

2. Accepting and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney;

3. Authorizing all other actions necessary to accept and record said easement agreement on behalf of the City of Marina, and;

4. Authorizing the City Clerk to record a certified copy of the resolution in the Monterey County office of the County Recorder.

BACKGROUND:

Shea Homes Limited Partnership (“Developer”) has submitted the 8th Street and California Avenue Improvement Plans to the City for review and approval. Staff has reviewed the improvement plans for construction and has found the plans to be in substantial conformance to City Standards, the Specific Plan requirements and Te ntative Map conditions as amended. In order to complete the ultimate roadway and intersection improvements along 8th Street, additional right-of-way is needed within CSUMB’s property as show n in “EXHIBIT A”. CSUMB has provided a draft easement agreement (“EXHIBIT B ”) that establishes the easement area required for the roadway and intersection improvements and maintenance responsibilities for those improvements. The Public Works Director, Community Development Director and City Manager will execute all necessary documents to establish the easement and execute the Agreement. The Trail area as shown on Exhibit A will remain owned and be maintained by CSUMB.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Should the City Council approve this request, the City has negotiated an easement cost of $143,612 for the areas shown within Exhibit A which shall be paid through the General Fund. Continued maintenance of the public street , northern sidewalk (adjacent to Hilltop Park) , streetlights, and stormwater facilities shall be incorporated into the City’s Public Works Maintenance schedule and funded by the City’s General Fund maintenance budget for the different improvements.

Maintenance of the southern multi-use pathway adjacent to CSUMB property shall be conducted and funded by CSUMB.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Edrie Delos Santos, P.E.

Engineering Division
Public Works Department

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

APPROVING THE 8th STREET EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CITY OF MARINA AND CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, MONTEREY BAY (CSUMB), AND; ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF CITY

SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY; AND, AUTHORIZING ALL OTHER ACTIONS NECESSARY

TO ACCEPT AND RECORD SAID EASEMENT AGREEMENT ON BEHALF
OF THE CITY OF MARINA; AND, AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO

RECORD A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE RESOLUTION IN THE MONTEREY

COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER

The public improvements did not include the extension of 8th Street from 3rd Avenue to California Avenue or the ultimate improvements to California Avenue from 8th Street to Imjin Parkway.

WHEREAS, Shea Homes Limited Partnership (“Developer”) has submitted the 8 th Street and California Avenue Improvement Plans to the City for review and approval. Staff has reviewed the improvement plans for construction and has found the plans to be in substantial conformance to City Standards, the Specific Plan requirements and Tentative Map conditions as amended. In order to complete the ultimate roadway and intersection improvements along 8th Street, additional right- of-way is needed within CSUMB’s propert y as shown in “Exhibit A”. CSUMB has provided a draft easement agreement (“Exhibit B” ) that establishes the easement area required for the roadway and intersection improvements and maintenance responsibilities for those improvements.

The Public Works Director, Community Development Director and City Manager will execute all necessary docum ents to establish the easement and execute the Agreement. The Trail area as shown on Exhibit A will remain owned and be maintained by CSUMB.

WHEREAS, should the City Council approve this request, the City has negotiated an easement cost of $143,612 for the areas shown within Exhibit A which shall be paid through the General Fund. Continued maintenance of the public street, northern sidewalk (adjacent to Hilltop Park), streetlights, and stormwater facilities shall be incorporated into the City’s Public Works Maintenance schedule and funded by the City’s General Fund maintenance budget for the different improvements. Maintenance of the southern multi-use pathway adjacent to CSUMB property shall be conducted and funded by CSUMB, and;

3 Resolution No. 2026-

Page 2 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Approve the 8th Street Easement Agreement between the City of Marina and California State University, Monterey Bay (CSUMB), and;

2. Accept and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of City subject to final review and approval by the City Attorney;

3. Authorize all other actions necessary to accept and record said easement agreement on behalf of the City of Marina, and;

4. Authorize the City Clerk to record a certified copy of the resolution in the Monterey County office of the County Recorder.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

___________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 HILLTOP PARK
CSUMB
STOP
STOP
STOP
8TH STREET SECTION WITH BIKE LANES
NORTH(HILLTOP PARK)SOUTH(CSUMB)NORTH(HILLTOP PARK)SOUTH(CSUMB)8TH STREET SECTION WITH PARKINGCITY OF MARINA, CALIFORNIAPHASE 2 EAST - RIGHT-OF-WAY MAPTHE DUNES ON MONTEREY BAYSheet 2 of 2Civil EngineeringLand Surveying6 Harris CourtMonterey, California831.649.5225whitsonengineers.comAugust 13, 2025Project No.:3140.30 8TH STREETLEGEND

EXHIBIT A TO STAFF REPORT

CSU Easement Template (Rev. 2/2025)

TLR No. [______________________]

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

Location: Unincorporated Monterey County
Recording Fee $_____________________________
Document Transfer Tax $ __________
[ ] This is a conveyance where the consideration and
Value is less than $100.00 (R&T 11911).
[ ] Computed on Full Value of Property Conveyed, or
[ ] Computed on Full Value Less Liens
& Encumbrances Remaining at Time of Sale
[ ] Exempt from the fee per GC 27388.1 (a) (2); This
document is subject to Documentary Transfer Tax

____________________________________________
Signature of declarant or agent determining tax

LD #
- SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE –

AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT

This Agreement and Grant of Easement is entered into by and between the Board of Trustees of The California State University, the State of California acting in its higher education capacity, on behalf of California State University, Monterey Bay, hereinafter called “Trustees”, and City of Marina, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called “Grantee”.

Trustees, pursuant to the provisions of Section 89048 of the California Education Code, and in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, and the public benefit provided, hereby grant unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement to excavate for, construct, reconstruct, replace (of initial or any other size), remove, inspect, operate and maintain facilities of the type hereinafter specified, together with a right of way therefor, within the easement area as hereinafter set forth, over and across that certain real property situated in the unincorporated as of the County of Monterey, State of California, described as follows:

(APN’s 031-101-034)

The parcel of land designated Parcel 5 as shown upon the Record of Survey Map filed for record in Volume 19 of Surveys at page 15 in the Monterey County Records.

The facilities and easement area are described as follows:

Storm drain system improvements, curb, gutter, asphalt concrete pavement, street lights and electrical facilities, sidewalk, striping, traffic signs and other roadway appurtenances within the road rights-of-way as described in Exhibits “A-1 and B-1” attached hereto and made a part hereof.

Grantee agrees that on receiving a request in writing, it will at Grantee’s expense, survey, prepare and record a “Notice of Final Description” referring to this instrument and setting forth a description of said parcel of land.

EXHIBIT B TO

STAFF REPORT
6 REV 02/2025 P age 2 of 6
THE PROVISIONS ON PAGES 3–4 HEREOF CONSTITUTE A PART OF THIS AGREEMENT AND G
RANT OF EASEMENT.

Date APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:

By
[____________________]
[__________________],
C
alifornia State University, Monterey Bay
APPROVED: ____________________________
By
[____________________]
[__________________]
APPROVED: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
C

ALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
By
Paul Gannoe
Assistant Vice Chancellor
Capital Planning, Design & Construction
7 REV 02/2025 Page 3 of 6
PROVIDED, this Agreement and Grant of Easement is subject to the following terms and conditions:

1. This Agreement and Grant of Easement is subject to existing contracts, leases, licenses, easements, encumbrances, and claims which may affect said real property and the use of the word “Grant” herein shall not be construed as a covenant against the existence of any thereof.

2. Grantee agrees that any improvements or other property installed under the authority of this easement shall be constructed, altered, replaced, operated, and maintained in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and shall be well and safely maintained by Grantee at all times while this Agreement and Grant of Easement is operative, and Grantee shall conduct all activities within the easement area in a safe, prudent, professional, and workmanlike manner and following any such activities shall leave the easement area in as near as practicable a condition that existed prior to such activities.

3. Whenever reasonably possible to do so, Grantee shall provide advance notice to California State University, Monterey Bay to the person or office and by the means specified by Trustees from time to time) prior to maintenance, cleaning and inspection activities in the easement, but such notice shall be a courtesy and not a requirement of this easement.

4. Grantee waives all claims against the State of California, Trustees, and its trustees, auxiliaries, affiliates, officers, directors, lessees, agents, employees, invitees, and volunteers (the “Indemnified Parties”) for loss or damage caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with Grantee’s exercise of the rights granted under this easement, and Grantee agrees to save harmless, indemnify, and defend the Indemnified Parties from any and all loss, damage or liability which may be suffered or incurred by the Indemnified Parties caused by, arising out of, or in any way connected with any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Grantee or its employees or agents in its exercise of the rights hereby granted. The foregoing waiver and indemnification shall not apply to the extent that any such loss or damage is caused by the comparative negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties.

5. Trustees reserve the right to use said real property in any manner, provided such use does not unreasonably interfere with Grantee's rights hereunder.

6. Trustees reserve the right to require Grantee, at Trustees' expense, to remove and relocate all improvements placed by Grantee upon said real property, upon determination by Trustees that the same interfere with future development of Trustees' property. Upon written notice and demand for removal and relocation of the improvements, Grantee shall remove and relocate the improvements to a feasible location on the property of Trustees. Such location must be feasible from an engineering and operating standpoint in the opinion of Grantee, and Trustees shall furnish Grantee with a good and sufficient grant of easement for the construction, installation, maintenance and operation of Grantee's improvements in such new location, on the same terms and conditions as herein stated, all without cost to Grantee, and Grantee thereupon shall reconvey to Trustees the easement herein granted.

7. This easement shall terminate in the event Grantee abandons or fails to use said easement for the purposes herein granted, for a continuous period of two (2) years. Upon such termination, Grantee shall forthwith upon service of written demand, deliver to Trustees a quitclaim deed, to its right, title and interest hereunder, and shall, on Trustees' request, without cost to Trustees and within nine (9) months from written demand by Trustees remove all above ground improvements or other property placed by or for Grantee upon Trustees' real property and restore the premises as nearly as possible to the same condition they were in prior to the execution of this easement.
8 REV 02/2025 Page 4 of 6

8. In making any excavation on said property of Trustees, Grantee shall make the same in such manner as will cause the least injury to the surface of the ground around such excavation, and shall replace the earth so removed by it and restore the surface of the ground and any landscaping or improvements thereon to as near the same condition as they were prior to such excavation as is practicable.

9. To the extent reasonably necessary for Grantee’s use and enjoyment of the rights granted hereby, Trustees also grant to Grantee the right of ingress to and egress from the easement area over and across the lands of Trustees, by means of the roads and lanes thereon, if such there be, otherwise by such route or routes as shall occasion the least practicable damage and inconvenience to Trustees, provided, that such right of ingress and egress shall not extend to any portion of the lands which is isolated from the easement area by any public road or highway, now crossing or hereafter crossing the lands.

10. Subject to the terms of Paragraph 2, Trustees further grants to Grantee the right, from time to time, to trim or to cut down, without Grantee paying compensation to Trustees, any and all trees and brush now or hereafter within said easement area, and shall have the further right, from time to time, to trim and cut down trees and brush along each side of said easement area which now or hereafter in the opinion of Grantee may interfere with or be a hazard to the facilities installed hereunder, or as Grantee deems necessary to comply with applicable state or federal regulations.

11. Trustees hereby covenant and agree not to place or construct, nor allow a third party to place or construct, any building or other structure, or store flammable substances, or drill or operate any well, or construct any reservoir or other obstruction within said easement area, or diminish or substantially add to the ground level within said easement area, or construct any fences that will interfere with the maintenance and operation of said facilities.

12. To the extent reasonably necessary for Grantee’s use and enjoyment of the rights granted hereby, Trustees also grants to Grantee the right, from time to time, on a temporary basis, to use such portion of said lands contiguous to said easement area as may be reasonably necessary in connection with the excavation, construction, reconstruction, replacement, removal, maintenance and inspection of said facilities.

13. The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto, and all covenants shall apply to and run with the land.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Grantee shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign, transfer, license, or otherwise transfer all or any part of its rights, duties, or interests in this Agreement and Grant of Easement without Trustees’ prior written consent, which may be granted or withheld in Trustee’s sole discretion; provided, that Trustees’ consent shall not be required for (a) assignments to any parent company, subsidiary or affiliates, under which the assignee accepts all of the obligations and liabilities hereunder, (b) assignments by operation of law in connection with any merger or consolidation of Grantee with or into a Person whether or not Grantee is the surviving or resulting Person, or (c) assignments to a purchaser of all of the outstanding equity securities of, or substantially all of the assets of, Grantee, provided, in each case, that such assignments or transfers do not result in a change of control of Grantee. Any attempt to make an assignment in violation of this provision shall be null and void.

14. This document may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.

15. Grantee shall provide Trustees with a copy of the recorded version of this document. 9 REV 02/2025 Page 5 of 6

10 REV 02/2025 Page 6 of 6

11 June 11, 2026 Item No. 10h(1)

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 16, 2026

CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 26-,

ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF P UBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AS

SHOWN ON THE APPROVED DUNES (FORMERLY UNIVERSITY

VILLAGE) IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND PARCEL MAP FOR PHASE
1B-PROMENADE, AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO RELEASE

BOND SECURITIES , ACCEPT A WARRANTY BOND, AND RECORD
ACCEPTANCE WITH THE MONTEREY COUNTY RECORDER’S
OFFICE

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 20 26-, accepting the dedication of Public Improvements as shown on the approved Dunes (Formerly University Village) Improvement Plans and Parcel Map for Phase 1B-Promenade, and;

2. Authorizing the City Clerk to release bond securities, accept a warranty bond, and record acceptance with Monterey County Recorder’s Office.

BACKGROUND:

At the regularly scheduled meeting of May 31, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2005-127, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the University Village Development Project.

At the regularly scheduled meeting of May 31, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2005-128, approving the General Plan Amendments, Resolution No. 2005 -130, for the Specific Plan, Resolution No. 2005 -131, for the Tentative Map and Resolution No. 2 005-132, Design Review for the regional retail, the Village Promenade and all residential phases for the former University Village Development Project.

At the regularly scheduled meeting of May 3, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- 52, approving an amendment to University Village Phase 1B-Promenade Tentative Map.

At the regularly scheduled meeting of March 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-28, approving the Phase 1B-Promenade Public Improvement Agreement between the City of Marina and Shea Homes, LP. A Faithful Performance bond and a Labor and Materials bond have each been filed with the City Clerk in the amount of $2,748,297.00.

1 ANALYSIS:

The Improvements required by the improvement plans entitled “ The Dunes on Monterey Bay Phase 1B-Promenade Improvement Plans” (“Improvement Plans ”), and approved by the City Engineer on December 13, 2022 , were completed by MCP in substantial conformance with the approved Improvement Plans for the project.

The Public Improvement Agreement states that a Guarantee and Warranty period will remain for one year after acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council.

Therefore, a request is being made by MCP to release all of the Faithful Performance bond. A new bond of 10% of the original Performance bond ($274,829.70) for public improvements in Phase 1B-Promenade will remain with the City Clerk as the Guarantee and Warranty Security for one (1) year after acceptance. Any repairs required during the Guarantee and Warranty period will be made by MCP, or the costs w ill be recovered from said bond . After the Warranty period, maintenance responsibilities for streetlights, sidewalks, pavement, and stormwater improvements will be covered by the City.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impacts for maintenance of these improvements after the warranty period have been captured in the Community Facilities District, Dunes 2024-01.

CEQA Findings:

The City has determined this is not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Edrie Delos Santos, P.E.

Engineering Division
Public Works Department

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

ACCEPTING DEDICATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON

APPROVED DUNES (FORMERLY UNIVERSITY VILLAGE) IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND PARCEL MAP FOR PHASE 1-PROMENADE, AUTHORIZING

CITY CLERK TO RELEASE BOND SECURITIES, ACCEPTING A WARRANTY

BOND, AND RECORD ACCEPTANCE WITH MONTEREY COUNTY
RECORDER’S OFFICE

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 31, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2005 -127, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the University Village Development Project, and;

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 31, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2005-128, approving the General Plan Amendments, Resolution No. 2005-130, for the Specific Plan, Resolution No. 2005-131, for the Tentative Map and Resolution No. 2005-132, Design Review for the regional retail, the Village Promenade and all residential phases for the former University Village Development Project, and;

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of May 3, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -52, approving an a mendment to University Village Phase 1B-Promenade Tentative Map, and;

WHEREAS, at the regularly scheduled meeting of March 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023 -28, approving the Phase 1B -Promenade Public Improvement Agreement between the City of Marina and Shea Homes, LP. A Faithful Performance bond and a Labor and Materials bond have each been filed with the City Clerk in the amount of $2,748,297.00, and;

WHEREAS, the Improvements required by the improvement plans entitled “The Dunes on Monterey Bay Phase 1B-Promenade Improvement Plans” (“Improvement Plans”), and approved by the City Engineer on December 13, 2022, were completed by MCP in substantial conformance with the approved Improvement Plans for the project. The Public Improvement Agreement states that a Guarantee and Warranty period will remain for o ne year after acceptance of the Improvements by the City Council, and;

WHEREAS, a request is being made by MCP to release all of the Faithful Performance bond. A new bond of 10% of the original Performance bond ($274,829.70) for public improvements in Phase 1B-Promenade will remain with the City Clerk as the Guarantee and Warranty Security for one (1) year after acceptance. Any repairs required during the Guarantee and Warranty period will be made by MCP, or the costs will be recovered from said bond. After the Warranty period, maintenance responsibilities for streetlights, sidewalks, pavement, and stormwater improvements will be covered by the City, and;

3 Resolution No. 2026-

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, the fiscal impacts for maintenance of these improvements after the warranty period have been captured in the Community Facilities District, Dunes 2024-01, and;

WHEREAS, the City has determined this is not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Accept dedication of Public Improvements as shown on the approved Dunes (Formerly University Village) Improvement Plans and Final Map for Phase 1B-Promenade;

2. Authorize the City Clerk to release Performance, and Labor and Materials bond securities;

3. Authorize the City Clerk to accept a warranty bond, and;

4. Authorize the City Clerk to record acceptance with Monterey County Recorder’s Office.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 16th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 EXHIBIT A TO

STAFF REPORT
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
MS

T HIGHLIGHTS
Board of Directors Meeting
June 8, 2026

RECOGNIZED JUNE MST EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH
The MST Board adopted Resolution 2026-19 recognizing Ursulla Scardina, Communications Specialist as Employee of the Month for June 2026 and for her outstanding contribution to MST and the entire community.

RECOGNIZED APTA EMERGING LEADERS GRADUATE
The MST Board recognized Emma Patel, Planning Manager, as a May 2026 graduate of the APTA Emerging Leaders Program.

RECOGNIZED NATIONAL SAFETY MONTH
The MST Board received a special presentation recognizing MST as the recipient of the APTA Safe, Clean, and Efficient GOLD Award and announced the Employee BBQ dates.

APPROVED FY2026 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
The MST Board of Directors approved the FY2026 Federal Program of Projects and authorized the filing of the appropriate grant applications with the Federal Transit Administration and Caltrans.

ADOPTED FY2027 – FY2028 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET
The MST Board held a public hearing, adopted the FY2027 – FY2028 Operating and Capital Budget, approved Resolution 2026-20 authorizing the filing of Federal Grant applications, and authorized staff to apply to the Transportation Agency for Monterey County for Transportation Development Act Local Transportation Funds and State Transit Assistance for FY 2027.

AUTHORIZED A CONTRACT WITH JAWNT FOR RELOADABLE

TRANSIT/PARKING PAYMENT CARDS
The MST Board authorized the General Manager/CEO or their designee to enter into a three (3) year contract with Jawnt for reloadable cEMV transit/parking payment cards, with the option to extend for two (2) additional one (1) year terms, in an amount not to exceed $2,101,206, including option years.

Agenda Item: 10j(1)
June 16, 2026

RECEIVED REPORT FROM NOMINATING COMMITTEE AND CONDUCTED

ELECTION OF OFFICERS
The MST Board received a report from the nominating committee, conducted an election of officers, and appointed Tony Barrera from the City of Salinas, to serve as the MST Board Chair and appointed Luis Alejo, from the County of Monterey, to serve as the MST Board Vice Chair for fiscal years 2027 and 2028.

NEXT MST BOARD MEETING
The next regular MST Board meeting is scheduled for July 13, 2026.

June 11, 2026 Item No. 11a
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 16, 2026

CITY COUNCIL OPEN PUBLIC HEARING, TAK E TESTIMONY FROM
THE PUBLIC AND CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2026-,

CONFIRMING DIAGRAM, ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING LEVY OF
$182.42 FOR FY 2026-27 ASSESSMENT FOR THE SEABREEZE
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT , AND;

AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF

THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT WITH THE MONTEREY COUNTY
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER PRIOR TO AUGUST 1, 2026
REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council:

1. Open public hearing and take testimony from the public;

2. Consider adopting Resolution No. 20 26-, confirming diagram, assessment and ordering levy of $18 2.42 for FY 2026-27 assessment for Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District; and,

3. Authorize the City Clerk to file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the Monterey County Auditor-Controller prior to August 1, 2026 BACKGROUND:

At the regular meeting of June 4, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1996 -62, ordering the formation of the Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District pursuant to Streets and Highway Code §22594 and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 to maintain certain improvements required of new development as a condition of the subdivision approvals.

The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires an annual update report to be prepared which includes the costs to maintain the improvements of the Districts and what the proposed assessments will be to provide for that maintenance.

At the regular meeting of May 19, 202 6, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-50, receiving the FY 2026-27 Engineer’s Report for Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District and calling a public hearing for June 16 , 2026, on the proposed intention to levy and collect assessments for the District.

ANALYSIS:

Based on the Engineer’s Report (EXHIBIT A), the assessment has been set in the amount of $182.42. This is the same amount as the prior year's assessment and represents the maximum assessment authorized through the District's formation proceedings in 1996.

Staff recommends continuing the existing assessment of $182.42 per parcel for FY 2026 -27. As discussed in the Engineer's Report, annual expenditures and administrative costs are projected to exceed annual revenues, resulting in a declining fund balance. While no assessment increase is proposed for FY 2026 -27, staff anticipates conducting outreach with District property owners during the coming year regarding potential future assessment adjustments and long -term funding options to address the District's long-term financial sustainability. 1 FISCAL IMPACT:

Should the City Council approve this request, the anticipated revenue for the FY 2026-27 assessment levy is $6,749.54 for the purpose of the landscape maintenance district.

The levying of the assessment is the first step to collect the assessments to fund the landscape maintenance district.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Scott Shepard, P.E.

Public Works Department
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA
CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING LEVY OF $182.42 FOR FY 2026-27 ASSESSMENT FOR THE SEABREEZE LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK

TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT WITH THE MONTEREY COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER PRIOR TO AUGUST 1, 2026

WHEREAS, on June 4, 1996 , the City ordered the formation of the Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance District pursuant to Streets and Highway Code §22594, and;

WHEREAS, the City Engineer filed the Engineer's Report, fiscal year 2026 -27, required by Streets and Highways Code §22622 for said District, and;

WHEREAS, on May 19, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026 -50 receiving the Fiscal Year 2026 -27 Engineer's Report, declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within the District, and setting a public hearing for June 16, 2026, and;

WHEREAS, said public hearing was held on June 16, 2026, and;

WHEREAS, levying of the assessment is the first step to collect the assessments to fund the landscape maintenance districts, and;

WHEREAS, provisions of this resolution are severable and if any provision is determined to be impermissible then the remainder of the resolution shall remain in full force and effect, and;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina that:

1. The City does hereby confirm the diagram and assessment as described in the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk.

2. The City does hereby order the levy and collection of said assessment, $182.42, for FY 2026 -27 assessment for the Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District.

3. It is the intention of the City of Marina that any monetary advance mad e by it during any fiscal year to cover a deficit in the improvement fund of the Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District shall be repaid from the next annual assessments levied and collected within the Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District.

4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of said diagram and assessment with the Monterey County Auditor prior to August 1, 2026.

3 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 CITY OF MARINA

MONTEREY COUNTY

CALIFORNIA

SEABREEZE LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ENGINEER'S REPORT
FY 2026-2027
Council Members:

B. DELGADO, MAYOR
L. VISSCHER B. MCCARTHY
K. BIALA J. MCADAMS
LAYNE LONG City Manager
ANITA SHEPHERD-SHARP Deputy City Clerk
RENÉ ORTEGA City Attorney
ISMAEL HERNANDEZ Public Works Director
Prepared By
City of Marina
Public Works Department

EXHIBIT A
5 SEABREEZE

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

FY 2026-2027

INTRODUCTION
This Engineer’s Report has been prepared for the Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMD) pursuant to the provisions of the California Streets and Highways Code, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to provide an updated description of the District, identify the improvements being maintained, establish the method of assessment apportionment, and present the estimated costs and revenues required for the ongoing operation and maintenance of public improvements within the District.

The report also includes updated financial information for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and forward projections to assist the City Council in understanding the long-term fiscal condition of the District under current assumptions.

DISTRICT DESCRIPTION
The Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District is located on the north side of Beach Road and west of Marina Drive within the City of Marina, Monterey County, California. The District consists of thirty-seven residential parcels that were developed with complete infrastructure improvements, including streets, underground utilities, drainage facilities, and landscaped buffer areas.

The District was formed to ensure the long-term maintenance of certain common landscape and infrastructure improvements that were constructed as part of the original subdivision development and dedicated for ongoing public benefit. These improvements include street frontage landscaping, perimeter buffer areas, and landscape zones adjacent to drainage and transportation corridors.

IMPROVEMENTS MAINTAINED
The improvements maintained by the District include landscaped areas along the northerly side of Beach Road and within designated buffer zones adjacent to the Southern Pacific Railroad corridor and drainage percolation basin. These areas consist of ground cover, shrubs, and trees, as well as associated irrigation systems including piping, valves, controllers, emitters, and sprinkler infrastructure.

The District also provides for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of associated improvements as necessary to ensure the continued functionality and appearance of the landscaped areas. All improvements are maintained in accordance with the approved landscape and streetscape plans prepared for the Seabreeze subdivision.

EXHIBIT A
6 DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The District consists of 37 residential parcels as shown on the Assessment Diagram (Exhibit A).

Each parcel receives a proportionate benefit from the maintenance of the common landscaped areas.

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT (EXHIBIT D)
The costs associated with the maintenance of the District improvements are apportioned equally among all thirty-seven parcels. Each parcel receives a substantially equal benefit from the ongoing maintenance of the common landscaped areas, and therefore each parcel is assessed an equal share of the total annual costs. For Fiscal Year 2025–2026, the maximum assessment authorized under the original formation proceedings and consistent with Proposition 218 is $182.42 per parcel. Based on this assessment level, the total annual revenue generated by the District is approximately $6,750.

ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS
The annual cost of maintaining the District improvements is based on contracted services, administrative support, and cost allocation charges necessary to sustain operations.

Table 1
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Category Amount
Landscape Maintenance Contract $2,793
Administrative Services (Engineering + Report Preparation) $3,605 Cost Allocation Plan Charges $1,740
Legal Advertising $230
Total Estimated Expenditures $8,368

REVENUE AND FUNDING
The District is funded entirely through annual assessments levied on the thirty-seven parcels within its boundaries. For Fiscal Year 2026-2027, total assessment revenue is estimated at approximately $6,750, based on an equal per-parcel assessment of $182.42. These revenues are intended to fully fund the annual cost of maintaining the District improvements.

FUND BALANCE AND LONG-TERM OUTLOOK
Historical and projected fund balances indicate the following trend:

Table 2
Fiscal Year Ending Fund Balance
FY 2024-25 $477
FY 2025-26 $157
FY 2026-27 (est.) $(1,019)
FY 2027-28 (est.) $(2,373)
FY 2028-29 (est.) $(3,910)

While annual revenues currently offset annual expenditures, projected multi-year costs reflect gradual increases primarily driven by inflationary adjustments to contracted services and administrative allocations. Under current assumptions, the District is projected to experience declining fund balance levels in future fiscal years. Following the trends of prior years the district will become insolvent in the FY 27/28 without significant changes to service levels, administrative costs, or funding adjustments to maintain long-term fiscal sustainability.

EXHIBIT A
7 ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
A significant portion of total District expenditures consists of administrative support and City cost allocation charges required to manage, contract, and oversee maintenance activities.

Given the relatively small scale of the District, administrative costs represent a substantial proportion of total annual expenditures.

SUMMARY
The Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District continues to provide essential maintenance services that support the long-term functionality and appearance of common landscaped areas benefiting all parcels within the District. Under current funding assumptions, annual revenues are generally sufficient to support near-term maintenance obligations.

However, projected financial trends indicate that the District operates within a narrow fiscal margin, with limited capacity to absorb cost increases or unforeseen maintenance needs. Multi- year projections suggest a gradual decline in fund balance under existing revenue and cost assumptions, reflecting the impact of inflationary pressures and fixed revenue constraints.

ALTERNATIVES FOR CONSIDERATION
The City may consider the following general alternatives regarding long-term District operations:

Alternative 1: Maintain Existing Assessment Structure
Continue operations under the existing assessment rate and service levels. This alternative would require the city to adsorb a significant portion of administrative costs over the long-term operational outlook.

Alternative 2: Evaluate Revenue Adjustment Process
Considering updated assessments to align revenues with projected long-term expenditure and administrative cost increases. City staff changes, subject to applicable procedural requirements under Proposition 218. City staff will prepare an initial estimated assessment increase value to align expense with revenue outreach with Landscape Maintenance District residents to assess viability of the assessment increase.

Alternative 3: Evaluate Long-Term Service Structure
Considering potential modifications to the district’s long-term maintenance and administrative structure to optimize efficiency and sustainability of service delivery.

Reducing expenditures and administrative costs to align with revenue.

Alternative 4: Dissolve the Landscape Maintenance District This would require the city to maintain the landscape in City right-of-way but with a minimal cost increase to existing maintenance budgets.

EXHIBIT A
8 CONCLUSION
Throughout FY2026/2027 City staff will work with Landscape Maintenance District residents and provide outreach and coordination to address the above alternatives for long-term district operations. Results of this outreach and a recommendation for suture Landscape Maintenance District operation will be brought to council in Quarter 1 of 2027 during the FY2027/2028 hearing and budgetary planning for this Landscape Maintenance District .

This report is intended to provide an updated technical and fiscal overview of the District for Fiscal Year 2025–2026 and forward-looking planning purposes. All findings are presented for consideration by the City Council in evaluating the ongoing maintenance and funding structure of the district.

ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBITS
This report includes the following exhibits:

EXHIBIT A - An Assessment Diagram and Boundary Map showing all the parcels of the real property within the Assessment District and location of the landscaped areas to be maintained by the Assessment District. The Diagram is keyed to Exhibit C by the separate “Assessment District”.

EXHIBIT B - Spreadsheet showing estimated costs for FY 2025-2026, FY 2026-2027, FY 2027- 2028 and FY2028-2029.

EXHIBIT C - An assessment roll showing the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel of real property within this Assessment District. In addition to the Assessors Parcel Number each parcel has been assigned a separate “Assessment Number” which corresponds to the lot number of each parcel.

EXHIBIT D - A statement of the method by which the undersigned determined the amount to be assessed against each parcel based on the benefits to be derived by each parcel, respectively, from the improvements.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________
Scott Shepard, PE
City Engineer

EXHIBIT A
9 EXHIBIT C

SEABREEZE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSOR'S NET
ASSESSMENT NO. PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT
1 033-082-001 $182.42
2 033-082-002 $182.42
3 033-082-003 $182.42
4 033-082-004 $182.42
5 033-082-005 $182.42
6 033-082-006 $182.42
7 033-082-007 $182.42
8 033-082-008 $182.42
9 033-082-009 $182.42
10 033-082-010 $182.42
11 033-082-011 $182.42
12 033-082-012 $182.42
13 033-082-013 $182.42
14 033-082-014 $182.42
15 033-082-015 $182.42
16 033-082-016 $182.42
17 033-082-017 $182.42
18 033-082-018 $182.42
19 033-082-019 $182.42
20 033-082-020 $182.42
21 033-082-021 $182.42
22 033-082-022 $182.42

EXHIBIT A
10 SEABREEZE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSOR'S NET
ASSESSMENT NO. PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT
23 033-082-023 $182.42
24 033-082-024 $182.42
25 033-082-025 $182.42
26 033-082-026 $182.42
27 033-082-027 $182.42
28 033-082-028 $182.42
29 033-082-029 $182.42
30 033-082-030 $182.42
31 033-082-031 $182.42
32 033-082-032 $182.42
33 033-082-033 $182.42
34 033-082-034 $182.42
35 033-082-035 $182.42
36 033-082-036 $182.42
37 033-082-037 $182.42

EXHIBIT A
11 EXHIBIT D

METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD

The costs of maintaining the landscaped improvements within the Seabreeze Landscape Maintenance Assessment District provide a special benefit to all properties within the District.

These benefits are considered substantially equal in nature due to the uniform access and reliance on the common landscaped areas and associated improvements by each parcel.

Therefore, the total annual costs of maintenance and administration are apportioned equally among the thirty-seven residential parcels within the District, as shown on the Assessment Diagram (Exhibit A). Each parcel is assigned an equal share of the total annual assessment in accordance with the original formation methodology and consistent with the requirements of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972

EXHIBIT A
12 Actual Estimates Estimates Estimates
Summary FY 2025-2026 FY 2026-2027 FY 2027-2028 FY 2028-2029 Beginning Cash Balance, July 1st 477$ 157$ (1,019)$ (2,373)$ (a)Total Assessment Revenues (37 Parcels) 6,750$ 6,750$ 6,750$ 6,751$ Expenditures
Contractor Services
(b) Landscape Maintenance Contract 2,034$ 2,793$ 2,877$ 2,963$ Utilities -$ -$ -$ -$ Large Tree Trimming -$ -$ -$ -$ Extraordinary Maintenance -$ -$
Plant Replacement -$ -$ -$ -$ Administrative Services
Administration (Incl. Engineers Report) 3,070$ 3,162$ 3,257$ 3,355$ Cost Allocation Plan Charges 1,740$ 1,740$ 1,740$ 1,740$ Legal Advertising 226$ 230$ 230$ 230$ Total Expenditures 7,070$ 7,925$ 8,104$ 8,288$ (c)Net Change in Fund Balance (320)$ (1,175)$ (1,354)$ (1,537)$ (d)Ending Fund Balance, June 30th 157$ (1,019)$ (2,373)$ (3,910)$

EXHIBIT B

SEABREEZE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
(e) Financial projections are based on current service levels, known cost estimates, and assumed annual inflation factors.

Actual revenues and expenditures may vary from these projections due to changes in contract pricing, maintenance needs, or other unforeseen conditions.
(d) End Fund Balance equals the Net Change in Fund Balance plus the Beginning Cash Balance of that Fiscal Year. (a) Maximum Assessment per Prop 218 is $182.42 per parcel. The assessment amount for FY26-27 is consistent with FY25-26 at $182.42 per parcel.
(b) Maintenance Costs are shown as increasing per fiscal year by an estimated Consumer Cost Index (CPI) of 3% as allowed by the Contract Specifications.
(c) Net Change in Fund Balance equals the Total Expenditures subtracted from Total Assessment Revenue for that Fiscal Year.

EXHIBIT A
13 June 11, 2026 Item No. 11b
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 16, 2026

CITY COUNCIL OPEN PUBLIC HEARING, TAK E TESTIMONY FROM
THE PUBLIC AND CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2026-,

CONFIRMING DIAGRAM, ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING LEVY OF
$77.14 FOR THE FY 2026-27 ASSESSMENT FOR THE MONTEREY BAY

ESTATES LIGHTING & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A

CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT WITH THE

MONTEREY COUNTY AUDITOR -CONTROLLER PRIOR TO AUGUST
1, 2026
REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council:

1. Open public hearing and take testimony from the public;

2. Consider adopting Resolution No. 2 026-, confirming diagram, assessment and ordering levy of $77.14 for FY 2026-27 assessment for the Monterey Bay Estates Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Assessment District; and

3. Authorize the City Clerk to file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the Monterey County Auditor-Controller prior to August 1, 2026.

BACKGROUND:

At the regular meeting of October 3, 1989, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1989-62, ordering the formation of the Monterey Bay Estates Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Assessment District pursuant to Streets and Highway Code §22594 and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 to maintain certain improvements required of new de velopment as a condition of the subdivision approvals.

The Landscaping and Lighting Ac t of 1972 requires an annual update report to be prepared which includes the costs to maintain the improvements of the Districts a nd what the proposed assessments will be to provide for that maintenance.

At the regular meeting of May 19, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-51, receiving the FY 2026-27 Engineer’s Report for Monterey Bay Estates Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Assessment District and calling a public hearing for June 16, 2026, on the proposed intention to levy and collect assessments for the District.

ANALYSIS:

Based on the Engineer’s Report (EXHIBIT A), the assessment has been set in the amount of $77.14. This is the same amount as the prior year's assessment and represents the maximum assessment currently authorized for the District. 1 Staff recommends continuing the existing assessment of $77.14 per parcel for FY 2026 -27. The District currently maintains a positive fund balance and remains financially stable in the near term. However, as discussed in the Engineer’s Report, projected expenditures and administrative costs are expected to gradually increase while assessment revenues remain fixed, resulting in a gradual decline in available reserves.

While no assessment increase is proposed for FY 2026 -27, staff anticipates conducting outreach with District property owners during the coming year regarding potential future assessment adjustments and long -term funding options to support the District’s continued financial sustainability.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Should the City Council approve this request, the anticipated revenue for the FY 2026-27 assessment levy is $12,496.68 for the purpose of the landscape maintenance district.

Levying of the assessment is the first step to collect the assessments to fund the landscape maintenance district.

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.

Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________
Scott Shepard, P.E.

Public Works Department
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

____________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina

_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA

CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING LEVY OF $77.14 FOR FY 2026-27 ASSESSMENT FOR THE MONTEREY BAY ESTATES

LIGHTING & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT WITH THE MONTEREY COUNTY AUDITOR- CONTROLLER PRIOR TO AUGUST 1, 2026

WHEREAS, on October 3, 1989 , the City ordered the formation of the Monterey Bay Estates Lighting & Landscape Maintenance District pursuant to Streets and Highway Code §22594, and;

WHEREAS, the City Engineer filed the Engineer's Report, Fiscal Year 2026-2027, required by Streets and Highways Code §22622 for said District, and;

WHEREAS, on May 19, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026 -51 receiving the Fiscal Year 2026 -27 Engineer's Report, declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within the District, and setting a public hearing for June 16, 2026; and

WHEREAS, said public hearing was held on June 16, 2026, and;

WHEREAS, levying of the assessment is the first step to collect the assessments to fund the landscape maintenance districts, and;

WHEREAS, provisions of this resolution are severable and if any provision is determined to be impermissible then the remainder of the resolution shall remain in full force and effect, and;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Marina that:

1. The City does hereby confirm the diagram and assessment as described in the Engineer's Report on file with the City Clerk.

2. The City does hereby order the levy and collection of said assessment, $77.14, for FY 2026 -27 assessment for the Monterey Bay Estates Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Assessment District.

3. It is the intention of the City of Marina that any monetary advance mad e by it during any fiscal year to cover a deficit in the improvement fund of the Monterey Bay Estates Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Assessment District shall be repaid from the next annual assessments levied and collected within the Monterey Bay Estates Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Assessment District.

4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of said diagram and assessment with the Monterey County Auditor prior to August 1, 2026.

3 Resolution No. 2026 -
Page Two

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk

4 CITY OF MARINA

MONTEREY COUNTY

CALIFORNIA

MONTEREY BAY ESTATES LIGHTING

AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ENGINEER'S REPORT
FY 2026-2027
Council Members:

EXHIBIT A
5 MONTEREY BAY ESTATES

LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

FY 2026-2027

INTRODUCTION
This Engineer’s Report has been prepared for the Monterey Bay Estates Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMD) pursuant to the provisions of the California Streets and Highways Code, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to provide an updated description of the District, identify the improvements being maintained, establish the method of assessment apportionment, and present the estimated costs and revenues required for the ongoing operation and maintenance of public improvements within the District.

DISTRICT DESCRIPTION

The Monterey Bay Estates Landscape Maintenance Assessment District is located within the City of Marina, Monterey County, California, and consists of residential parcels developed with associated infrastructure improvements, including streets, utilities, drainage facilities, and landscaped common areas.

The District was formed to provide for the long-term maintenance of landscaped improvements and related infrastructure that serve a common benefit to all properties within the District.

IMPROVEMENTS MAINTAINED
The District provides for the maintenance of landscaped areas, including ground cover, shrubs, trees, irrigation systems, and associated appurtenances such as controllers, valves, piping, and sprinkler infrastructure.

Maintenance activities include routine landscaping services, irrigation system operation and repair, replacement of plant material, and upkeep of drainage -adjacent landscaping areas to preserve both functional and aesthetic conditions.

DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
The District consists of 162 residential parcels as shown on the Assessment Diagram (Exhibit A). Each parcel receives a proportionate benefit from the maintenance of the common landscaped areas.

EXHIBIT A
6 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT (EXHIBIT D)
Costs associated with the maintenance of District improvements are apportioned equally among all parcels within the District. Each parcel receives a substantially equal benefit from the ongoing maintenance of shared landscaped areas; therefore, each parcel is assessed an equal share of the total annual costs.

The assessment methodology is consistent with the original formation proceedings and compliant with Proposition 218 requirements.

Table 1
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Category Amount
Landscape Maintenance Contract $5,988
Administrative Services (Engineering + Report Preparation) $3,605 Cost Allocation Plan Charges $2871
Legal Advertising $216
Total Estimated Expenditures $7,306

REVENUE AND FUNDING
The District is funded entirely through annual assessments levied on the 162 parcels within its boundaries. For Fiscal Year 2026 -2027, total assessment revenue is estimated at approximately $ 12,497, based on an equal per -parcel assessment of $ 77.14. These revenues are intended to fully fund the annual cost of maintaining the District improvements.

FUND BALANCE AND LONG-TERM OUTLOOK
Historical and projected fund balances indicate the following trend:

Table 2
Fiscal Year Ending Fund Balance
FY 2024-25 $6,944
FY 2025-26 $6,177
FY 2026-27 (est.) $ 7,608
FY 2027-28 (est.) $7,306
FY 2028-29 (est.) $6,709

While the District is currently in a positive fund balance position and remains financially stable in the near term, projections indicate a gradual decline over the multi-year planning horizon. This trend is primarily driven by ongoing inflationary increas es in maintenance and administrative costs, combined with relatively fixed revenue capacity under the current assessment structure.

Although the District is not presently in financial distress, continued downward pressure on fund balance suggests that the current funding model may not be fully sustainable in the long term without future adjustments.

EXHIBIT A
7 ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
A significant portion of annual District expenditures is associated with administrative services and Citywide cost allocation charges required to manage contracts, oversee maintenance activities, and ensure compliance with applicable requirements.

Given the relatively small scale of the District, administrative costs represent a meaningful component of total annual expenditures and contribute to long-term fund balance decline.

CONCLUSION
The Monterey Bay Estates Landscape Maintenance Assessment District continues to provide essential services that support the appearance and functionality of common landscaped areas benefiting all parcels within the District.

The District is currently in stable financial condition with positive fund balances.

However, long -term projections indicate a gradual decline in reserves under existing assumptions, reflecting the impact of inflation and fixed assessment revenue constraints.

ENGINEER'S REPORT EXHIBITS
This report includes the following exhibits:

EXHIBIT A - An assessment diagram and boundary map showing all of the parcels of the real property within the Assessment District. The diagram is keyed to Exhibit C by the separate "Assessment Number".

EXHIBIT B - Spreadsheet showing actual and estimated maintenance costs for FY 2025 - 2026, FY 2026-2027, FY 2027-2028, FY2028-2029.

EXHIBIT C - An assessment roll showing the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel of real property within this Assessment District. In addition to the Assessor's Parcel Number each parcel has been assigned a separate "Assessment Number" which corresponds to that parcel's lot number.

EXHIBIT D- A statement of the method by which the undersigned determined the amount to be assessed against each parcel based on the benefits to be derived by each parcel, respectively, from the improvements.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________
Scott Shepard, PE
City Engineer

EXHIBIT A
8 EXHIBIT C

MONTEREY BAY ESTATES

LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSOR'S NET
ASSESSMENT NO. PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT
1 032-541-01 $77.14
2 032-541-02 $77.14
3 032-541-03 $77.14
4 032-541-04 $77.14
5 032-541-05 $77.14
6 032-541-06 $77.14
7 032-541-07 $77.14
8 032-541-08 $77.14
9 032-541-09 $77.14
10 032-541-10 $77.14
11 032-541-11 $77.14
12 032-541-12 $77.14
13 032-541-13 $77.14
14 032-541-14 $77.14
15 032-541-15 $77.14
16 032-541-16 $77.14
17 032-541-17 $77.14
18 032-541-18 $77.14
19 032-541-19 $77.14
20 032-541-20 $77.14
21 032-541-21 $77.14
22 032-555-38 $77.14

EXHIBIT A
9 MONTEREY BAY ESTATES

LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSOR'S NET
ASSESSMENT NO. PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT
23 032-555-02 $77.14
24 032-542-01 $77.14
25 032-542-02 $77.14
26 032-542-03 $77.14
27 032-542-04 $77.14
28 032-542-05 $77.14
29 032-542-06 $77.14
30 032-542-07 $77.14
31 032-542-08 $77.14
32 032-542-09 $77.14
33 032-542-10 $77.14
34 032-542-11 $77.14
35 032-542-12 $77.14
36 032-542-13 $77.14
37 032-542-14 $77.14
38 032-542-15 $77.14
39 032-542-16 $77.14
40 032-542-17 $77.14
41 032-542-18 $77.14
42 032-542-25 $77.14
43 032-542-26 $77.14
44 032-542-21 $77.14
45 032-542-22 $77.14
46 032-542-23 $77.14

EXHIBIT A
10 MONTEREY BAY ESTATES

LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSOR'S NET
ASSESSMENT NO. PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT
47 032-542-24 $77.14
48 032-543-01 $77.14
49 032-543-02 $77.14
50 032-543-03 $77.14
51 032-543-04 $77.14
52 032-543-05 $77.14
53 032-543-06 $77.14
54 032-543-07 $77.14
55 032-543-08 $77.14
56 032-543-09 $77.14
57 032-543-10 $77.14
58 032-543-11 $77.14
59 032-543-12 $77.14
60 032-543-13 $77.14
61 032-543-14 $77.14
62 032-543-15 $77.14
63 032-543-16 $77.14
64 032-543-17 $77.14
65 032-543-18 $77.14
66 032-543-19 $77.14
67 032-551-01 $77.14
68 032-551-02 $77.14
69 032-551-03 $77.14
70 032-551-04 $77.14

EXHIBIT A
11 MONTEREY BAY ESTATES

LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSOR'S NET
ASSESSMENT NO. PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT
71 032-551-05 $77.14
72 032-551-06 $77.14
73 032-551-07 $77.14
74 032-551-08 $77.14
75 032-551-09 $77.14
76 032-551-10 $77.14
77 032-551-11 $77.14
78 032-551-12 $77.14
79 032-551-13 $77.14
80 032-551-14 $77.14
81 032-551-15 $77.14
82 032-551-16 $77.14
83 032-551-17 $77.14
84 032-551-18 $77.14
85 032-552-01 $77.14
86 032-552-02 $77.14
87 032-552-03 $77.14
88 032-552-04 $77.14
89 032-552-05 $77.14
90 032-552-06 $77.14
91 032-552-07 $77.14
92 032-552-08 $77.14
93 032-552-09 $77.14
94 032-552-10 $77.14

EXHIBIT A
12 MONTEREY BAY ESTATES

LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSOR'S NET
ASSESSMENT NO. PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT
95 032-552-11 $77.14
96 032-552-12 $77.14
97 032-552-13 $77.14
98 032-552-14 $77.14
99 032-552-15 $77.14
100 032-552-16 $77.14
101 032-552-17 $77.14
102 032-552-18 $77.14
103 032-553-01 $77.14
104 032-553-02 $77.14
105 032-553-03 $77.14
106 032-553-04 $77.14
107 032-553-05 $77.14
108 032-553-06 $77.14
109 032-553-07 $77.14
110 032-553-08 $77.14
111 032-553-09 $77.14
112 032-553-10 $77.14
113 032-553-11 $77.14
114 032-553-12 $77.14
115 032-553-13 $77.14
116 032-553-14 $77.14
117 032-553-15 $77.14
118 032-553-16 $77.14

EXHIBIT A
13 MONTEREY BAY ESTATES

LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSOR'S NET
ASSESSMENT NO. PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT
119 032-553-17 $77.14
120 032-553-18 $77.14
121 032-554-01 $77.14
122 032-554-02 $77.14
123 032-554-03 $77.14
124 032-554-04 $77.14
125 032-554-05 $77.14
126 032-554-06 $77.14
127 032-554-07 $77.14
128 032-554-08 $77.14
129 032-555-03 $77.14
130 032-555-39 $77.14
131 032-555-05 $77.14
132 032-555-06 $77.14
133 032-555-07 $77.14
134 032-555-08 $77.14
135 032-555-09 $77.14
136 032-555-10 $77.14
137 032-555-11 $77.14
138 032-555-12 $77.14
139 032-555-13 $77.14
140 032-555-14 $77.14
141 032-555-15 $77.14
142 032-555-16 $77.14

EXHIBIT A
14 MONTEREY BAY ESTATES

LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026

DIAGRAM AND ASSESSOR'S NET
ASSESSMENT NO. PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSMENT
143 032-555-17 $77.14
144 032-555-18 $77.14
145 032-555-19 $77.14
146 032-555-20 $77.14
147 032-555-21 $77.14
148 032-555-22 $77.14
149 032-555-23 $77.14
150 032-555-24 $77.14
151 032-555-25 $77.14
152 032-555-26 $77.14
153 032-555-27 $77.14
154 032-555-28 $77.14
155 032-555-29 $77.14
156 032-555-30 $77.14
157 032-555-31 $77.14
158 032-555-32 $77.14
159 032-555-33 $77.14
160 032-555-34 $77.14
161 032-555-35 $77.14
162 032-555-36 $77.14

EXHIBIT A
15 EXHIBIT D

METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD

The maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements and public lighting facilities within the Monterey Bay Estates Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Assessment District specially benefit all parcels within the District.

Because each residential lot receives substantially equal special benefit from the continued maintenance, operation, and servicing of these improvements, the assessment is apportioned equally among the 162 residential parcels within the District.

The annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is $77.14 per parcel, which does not exceed the maximum assessment previously authorized.

EXHIBIT A
16 ACTUAL Estimates Estimates Estimates
Summary FY 2025-2026 FY 2026-2027 FY 2027-2028 FY 2028-2029 Beginning Cash Balance, July 1st 6,177$ 7,608$ 7,306$ 6,709$ (a)Total Assessment Revenues (162 Parcels) 12,497$ 12,497$ 12,497$ 12,497$ Expenditures
Contractor Services
(b) Landscape Maintenance Contract 4,365$ 5,988$ 6,168$ 6,353$ Utilities 120$ 120$ 120$ 120$ Large Tree Trimming -$ -$ -$ -$ Extraordinary Maintenance -$ -$ -$ -$ Plant/Tree Removal/Replacement -$ -$ -$ -$ Administrative Services
Administration (Incl. Engineers Report) 3,500$ 3,605$ 3,713$ 3,825$ Cost Allocation Plan Charges 2,871$ 2,871$ 2,871$ 2,872$ Legal Advertising 209$ 216$ 222$ 229$ Total Expenditures 11,065$ 12,799$ 13,094$ 13,398$ (c)Net Change in Fund Balance 1,431$ (303)$ (597)$ (901)$ (d)Ending Fund Balance, June 30th 7,608$ 7,306$ 6,709$ 5,807$

EXHIBIT B

MONTEREY BAY ESTATES LIGHTING & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (e) Administrative Services for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 include estimated staff support for annual district administration, preparation and review of the Engineer’s Report, assessment coordination, contractor oversight, resident correspondence, and public hearing support. (f) Estimated annual staff time for administration includes approximately 20 hours of Assistant Engineer support and 4 hours of City Engineer review and oversight. (g) Projected expenditures for Fiscal Year 2027-2028 include an estimated 3% inflationary adjustment applied to applicable maintenance and administrative cost categories to reflect anticipated increases in labor, materials, contractual services, and operating expenses. (d) End Fund Balance equals the Net Change in Fund Balance plus the Beginning Cash Balance of that Fiscal Year.
(c) Net Change in Fund Balance equals the Total Expenditures subtracted from Total Assessment Revenue for that Fiscal Year.
(b) Maintenance Costs are shown as increasing per fiscal year by an estimated Consumer Cost Index (CPI) of 3% as allowed by the Contract Specifications. (a) Maximum Assessment per Prop 218 is $77.14 per parcel. The assessment amount for FY25-26 is consistent with FY24-25 at $77.14 per parcel.

EXHIBIT A
17 June 16, 2026 Item No. 13a

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the City Council of June 16, 2026

CITY COUNCIL RECEIVE PRESENTATION FROM FM3 CONSULTANT

REGARDING COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEY AND PROVIDE

DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING MARINA U TILITY USERS TAX
(UUT) AND RELATED RESOLUTION SUBMITTING A UUT MEASURE

TO VOTERS

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Receive presentation from FM3 Consultant regarding Community Opinion Survey; and

2. Provide direction to staff regarding the specific characteristics of a potential Marina Utility User Tax (UUT), including rate, covered utilities, and exemptions.

BACKGROUND:

Aging City Facilities, City Facility Citizens Advisory Committee, and City’s Previous Discussions Regarding Utility User Tax

As has been discussed at several previous City Council meetings over the last year, the City’s population has more than doubled since its incorporation in 1975, yet the City still relies on the same aging and deteriorating fire stations, police station, and city facilities that were built for a much smaller population. Many City buildings do not meet modern safety standards, are inaccessible to residents with disabilities, an d suffer from mold, asbestos, and leaks. The cost to modernize and/or replace these facilities is beyond what the City’s current revenues can support.

On September 23, 2025, the City Council held a special Study Session to discuss a pathway forward on meeting the needs for new City facilities, including a police station, fire station, emergency operations center, community center facilities, a new city hall and council chamber and potential funding strategies for constructing these new facilities.

Following the September 2025 discussion, Council directed staff to establish a City Facility Citizens Advisory Committee (CFCAC) to work with Tripepi Smith, staff, and other consultants as appropriate; initiate community outreach efforts, including tours, public meetings, and engagement opportunities to involve residents early in the process; conduct further research into funding mechanisms such as bonds and utility user tax options, potential exemptions, and case studies form other cities; and provide Coun cil with preliminary analysis of voter demographics, past election results, and a summary of the City’s available facility sites.

On December 16, 2025, staff and the CFCAC presented additional information to Council regarding potential funding strategies, including a general tax ballot measure in the form a Utility Users Tax, or UUT.

On January 21, 2026, staff and the CFCAC presented to Council the City Facilities Citizens Advisory Committee Report and Recommendations. At this same meeting, Council requested additional UUT-related information, including evaluating the UUT supporting information, identifying utilities that could be taxed, and reviewing potential tax exemptions.

Following th at meeting, staff worked with Keyser Marston to update the UUT estimates by extracting PG&E Data that was specific to Marina, requesting average commercial and residential revenues from the Marina Coast Water District; and using the City’s franchise fee information to estimate potential cable TV revenues. This updated information was presented to Council on March 3, 2026, including the following chart, which summarizes applicability and exemptions for UUTs in nearby cities:

At the March 3, 2026 Council meeting, staff also outlined funding options for critical city facility projects—a City Hall/Council Chamber, Police Department, and Fire Station —with total project costs of $69.25 million, of which roughly $19.3 million is partially funded, leaving about $49.98 million still needed. A second scenario added a Recreation Campus/Hillcrest project, raising total facility needs to $77.88 million with about $57.6 million remaining to be funded. (All figures are adjusted for an estimated 15% inflation assuming construction begins in 2027.)

Since the March 3, 2026 Council meeting, staff has further evaluated the options for a UUT in Marina, including potential rate(s), covered utilities, exemptions, and potential legal limitations.

As the Council has previously determined, the UUT would be a general tax, meaning that its revenues would be available for general municipal purposes. Accordingly, it would require only a simple majority (50% +1) vote to pass.

Summary of Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates (FM3) Polling Results

The City hired the survey research firm FM3 to gather resident viewpoints in a scientifically valid sampling of the community to evaluate public perception about critical services in the City and the potential for a UUT measure to address th ose critical needs. FM3 conducted a survey on the opinions of local funding for public facilities for the City of Marina. The survey interviewed 312 of the likely voters for the November 2026 election and was conducted through telephone and online interviews. Among other things, the survey tested the following proposed ballot question:

MARINA 911 EMERGENCY, PUBLIC SAFETY, COMMUNITY
SERVICES MEASURE. To ensure firefighters, paramedics, police officers response to emergencies/ natural disasters by funding police/fire stations; prevent disruptions to City services; provide safe play places for children, and provide general municipal services, shall the City of Marina’s measure establishing a 7% utility users’ tax, generating approximately $3,600,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted, requiring low-income rates, public spending disclosure, audits, all funds spent locally, be adopted?

In general, the survey concluded:
• A UUT measure for the City of Marina is viable for the November 2026 ballot, as long as the City is committed to ongoing outreach and communications about the measure and its impacts.
• On the initial vote, support is very close to the majority vote threshold needed for passage. • The total support is similar to results on past bond measures, but this measure requires only a simple majority of voter approval, not the two-thirds required for a bond measure. • When voters are provided with additional information about the proposed measure. support for the measure jumps to 65% and it remains well above the majority vote threshold after simulating robust opposition messaging.
• After information and opposition, support is higher than in past surveys, bolstered by an increasing number of Marina voters who perceive that the City needs additional funding. • There are several extremely high priorities for a potential measure, focused on services and outcomes from infrastructure investments, including:
o Maintaining safe/clean drinking water
o Emergency/natural disaster response
o Public safety
o Accessibility for disabled residents
o Repairing streets and potholes
o Preventing disruptions to City services

• It is also a high priority for voters that the measure includes fiscal accountability provisions such as spending disclosure, oversight and audits.
• An advisory measure does not seem to be necessary or helpful for the measure. • There is more support for a 7% UUT with low -income rates or exemptions than for a flat rate of 5%.

ANALYSIS:

Based on previous direction from Council, and staff’s evaluation of existing UUTs in nearby jurisdictions, staff recommends that a Marina UUT ordinance have the following applicability and exemptions:
• Applies to water, gas, electric, tele communications (including mobile), and video (including cable, satellite, and streaming);1
• 7% blanket tax rate
• Exemptions for certain low income households and seniors, to be further determined by City Council (see table below for proposed specific exemption approaches)

The following table shows the projected revenues from a UUT tax with these features, including variations depending on exemption types:

EXHIBIT A includes additional data from Keyser Marston showing the estimated per household costs for each exemption alternative.

If the City Council decides to pursue a UUT ordinance and measure, staff recommends that the Council direct it to bring back a draft resolution placing the measure on the ballot for Council

1 Earlier staff presentations had not included cable, satellite, and streaming, based in part on staff’s initial belief that administering and collecting taxes for these services would be difficult. However, upon further discussion with Keyser Marston, staff now understands that administering and collecting on these services is feasible. Thus, staff now recommends including these services in the UUT.

consideration at its July 7, 2026 meeting. The very last day to place any measure on the ballot for the November 2026 election is Friday, August 7, 2026, so the Council could potentially adopt the resolution at its August 3, 2026 meeting . However, staff recommends that the Council consider the resolution sooner in case changes need to be made or Council wants staff to provide additional information following the initial presentation of the draft resolution.

Future Actions

If the City Council directs staff to continue pursuing a UUT measure, staff will draft a resolution to present to the Council at its July 7, 2026 meeting, which will contain the ballot question and draft UUT ordinance. If adopted by the Council, the resolution will order the mea sure to be submitted to the voters at the November 3, 2026 general election.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact currently. If the voters approve the tax measure, the tax measure would generate substantial additional revenues, projected to range from $2.9 million to $ 4.1 million annually, depending upon exemptions included in the tax measure.

CONCLUSION:

Staff requests that the City Council provide definitive direction regarding the following questions:
• Does the City Council wish to direct staff to prepare a draft resolution and UUT ordinance to present at the next Council meeting? If so:
o What utilities should be taxed?
o At what rate(s)?
o What specific exemption(s) should the ordinance include?

_____________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

_____________________
René A. Ortega
City Attorney
City of Marina

2066302.8
Table 1
Estimated Utility User Tax (UUT) Revenue and Bond Capacity with a 7% Rate and Alternative Exemption Approaches City of Marina, C
A
Assumes water, gas, electric, telecommunications, video (including cable, satellite, streaming) subject to 7% UUT.

Full
Exemption
from UUT
Half regular rate
on all utilities
(3.5% UUT)
Exempt for
gas & electric
Full
Exemption
from UUT
Half regular rate
on all utilities
(3.5% UUT)
Exempt for
gas & electric
Estimate with No Exemptions (for comparison)
Low Income based on
PG&E Care (4) 30% $3.5 $4.0 $4.1 $53.3 $60.1 $62.3
Low Income (CARE)(4)
and Seniors 65+ under
$75,000 /yr
34% $3.4 $3.9 $4.0 $50.9 $58.9 $61.0
Low Income (CARE)(4)
and Seniors 65+ under
$100,000 /yr
38% $3.2 $3.8 $4.0 $48.9 $57.9 $60.3
Low Income (CARE)
(4)
and all Seniors 65+ 46% $2.9 $3.7 $3.8 $44.5 $55.7 $58.2 Notes
Annual UUT Estimate with 7% UUT (1)
($Millions)
Preliminary Estimate of Bond Capacity (2)
($Millions)
Estimated %Marina
Households Eligible (3)
Approach to
Exemptions or
Reduction to UUT
(4) Assumes any household demonstrating they are under 200% of the federal poverty limit also qualifies for the low-income exemption (same criteria as PG&E Care). $4.4 $66.8
(1) Estimates assume UUT applies to water, gas, electric, telecommunications, video (including cable, satellite, streaming). Internet cannot be taxed. Data on utility use by age or income is not available and thus average usage is assumed (with consideration of PG&E Care rates). The impact of exemptions may be less than estimated to the extent lower income and senior households spend less on utilities.
(2) Reflects preliminary estimates by the City's Municipal Advisor, Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates. KMA is not advising or recommending any action be taken by the City with respect to any prospective new or existing municipal financial products or issuance of municipal securities (including with respect to the structure, timing, terms, and other similar matters concerning such financial products or issues). KMA is not acting as a municipal advisor and does not assume any fiduciary duty, including, without limitation, a fiduciary duty pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act.
(3) Estimated based upon data available from the California Low Income Oversight Board and U.S. Census data for the City of Marina.

Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: UUT estimate 6-11-26; matrix sum; 6/11/2026; dd: Page 1 of 8

EXHIBIT A
Table 2A
Residential UUT Estimate Based on Estimated Per Household Utility Costs, With PG&E Care Exemption Approach City of Marina, C

A DRAFT
Number Households (1) 70% 5,789 30% 2,465 100% 8,254
Residential Utility Use
Monthly Utility Cost Avg per HH (2) Total Avg per HH (2) Total Avg per HH Total Electric $166 $961,000 $90 $221,000 $143 $1,182,000
Gas $74 $426,000 $59 $145,000 $69 $571,000
Water $82 $475,000 $82 $202,000 $82 $677,000
Phone / Mobile $110 $637,000 $110 $271,000 $110 $908,000 Video (streaming, cable, satellite) $91
$527,000 $91 $224,000 $91 $751,000
Total Per Month $523 $3,026,000 $431 $1,063,000 $495 $4,089,000 Annual Utility Cost $36,300,000 $12,800,000 $49,100,000 Monthly UUT from Residential
1% UUT 1% $5.20 $30,300 $4.30 $10,600 $5.00 $40,900
5% UUT 5% $26.10 $151,300 $21.60 $53,200 $24.80 $204,500 7% UUT 7% $36.60 $211,800 $30.20 $74,400 $34.70 $286,200 7% UUT, Full Exemption 7% $36.60 $211,800 $0.00 $0 $25.70 $211,800 7% UUT, 3.5% Rate 7% $36.60 $211,800 $15.10 $37,200 $30.20 $249,000 7% UUT, PG&E Exemption 7% $36.60 $211,800 $19.80 $48,800 $31.60 $260,600 (1) Reflects the number of occupied housing units per DOF as of January 1, 2025. See note 3 regarding estimated PG&E CARE participation. (2) See Table 3 for information on estimated monthly cost per household. (3) The percentage of households participating in PG&E CARE for Monterey County is estimated to be 28% based on data available from the Low Income Oversight Board. Data specific to Marina was not available. Marina was assumed to have a similar CARE Program rate of participation to the County as a whole. Assumes households that demonstrate they are under 200% of the federal poverty limit would also qualify (same criteria as PG&E Care).

Non-PG&E Care PG&E Care (3) All Households
Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: UUT estimate 6-11-26; Res UUT PGE; 6/11/2026; dd: Page 2 of 8 Table 2B
Residential UUT Estimate Based on Estimated Per Household Utility Costs, With PG&E Care + Seniors <$75k Exemption Approach City of Marina, C

A DRAFT
Number Households (1) 66% 5,410 34% 2,844 100% 8,254
Residential Utility Use
Monthly Utility Cost Avg per HH (2) Total Avg per HH (2) Total Avg per HH Total Electric $166 $899,000 $100 $284,000 $143 $1,183,000
Gas $74 $398,000 $61 $173,000 $69 $571,000
Water $82 $444,000 $82 $234,000 $82 $678,000
Phone / Mobile $110 $595,000 $110 $313,000 $110 $908,000 Video (streaming, cable, satellite) $91
$492,000 $91 $259,000 $91 $751,000
Total Per Month $523 $2,828,000 $444 $1,263,000 $496 $4,091,000 Annual Utility Cost $33,900,000 $15,200,000 $49,100,000 Monthly UUT from Residential
1% UUT 1% $5.20 $28,300 $4.40 $12,600 $5.00 $40,900
5% UUT 5% $26.10 $141,400 $22.20 $63,200 $24.80 $204,600 7% UUT 7% $36.60 $198,000 $31.10 $88,400 $34.70 $286,400 7% UUT, Full Exemption 7% $36.60 $198,000 $0.00 $0 $24.00 $198,000 7% UUT, 3.5% Rate 7% $36.60 $198,000 $15.50 $44,200 $29.30 $242,200 7% UUT, PG&E Exemption 7% $36.60 $198,000 $19.80 $56,400 $30.80 $254,400 (1) Reflects the number of occupied housing units per DOF as of January 1, 2025. See note 3 regarding estimated PG&E CARE participation.

Non-PG&E Care / Non-Senior PG&E Care + Seniors Under
$75,000 (3)
All Households
(3) Estimated based upon data available from the California Low Income Oversight Board and U.S. Census data for the City of Marina. (2) See Table 3 for information on estimated monthly cost per household. PG&E Care + Senior column utility costs reflects a weighted average of non-PG&E Care and PG&E Care rates.

Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: UUT estimate 6-11-26; Res UUT low income srs; 6/11/2026; dd: Page 3 of 8 Table 2C
Residential UUT Estimate Based on Estimated Per Household Utility Costs, With PG&E Care + Seniors <$100k Exemption Approach City of Marina, C

A DRAFT
Number Households (1) 62% 5,130 38% 3,124 100% 8,254
Residential Utility Use
Monthly Utility Cost Avg per HH (2) Total Avg per HH (2) Total Avg per HH Total Electric $166 $852,000 $106 $330,000 $143 $1,182,000
Gas $74 $378,000 $62 $193,000 $69 $571,000
Water $82 $421,000 $82 $257,000 $82 $678,000
Phone / Mobile $110 $564,000 $110 $344,000 $110 $908,000 Video (streaming, cable, satellite) $91
$467,000 $91 $284,000 $91 $751,000
Total Per Month $523 $2,682,000 $451 $1,408,000 $496 $4,090,000 Annual Utility Cost $32,200,000 $16,900,000 $49,100,000 Monthly UUT from Residential
1% UUT 1% $5.20 $26,800 $4.50 $14,100 $5.00 $40,900
5% UUT 5% $26.10 $134,100 $22.50 $70,400 $24.80 $204,500 7% UUT 7% $36.60 $187,700 $31.60 $98,600 $34.70 $286,300 7% UUT, Full Exemption 7% $36.60 $187,700 $0.00 $0 $22.70 $187,700 7% UUT, 3.5% Rate 7% $36.60 $187,700 $15.80 $49,300 $28.70 $237,000 7% UUT, PG&E Exemption 7% $36.60 $187,700 $19.80 $62,000 $30.30 $249,700 (1) Reflects the number of occupied housing units per DOF as of January 1, 2025. See note 3 regarding estimated PG&E CARE participation.

Non-PG&E Care / Non-Senior PG&E Care + Seniors Under
$100,000 (3)
All Households
(3) Estimated based upon data available from the California Low Income Oversight Board and U.S. Census data for the City of Marina. (2) See Table 3 for information on estimated monthly cost per household. PG&E Care + Senior column utility costs reflects a weighted average of non-PG&E Care and PG&E Care rates.

Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: UUT estimate 6-11-26; Res UUT srs under 100k; 6/11/2026; dd: Page 4 of 8 Table 2D
Residential UUT Estimate Based on Estimated Per Household Utility Costs, With PG&E Care + All Seniors Exemption Approach City of Marina, C

A DRAFT
Number Households (1) 54% 4,472 46% 3,782 100% 8,254
Residential Utility Use
Monthly Utility Cost Avg per HH (2) Total Avg per HH (2) Total Avg per HH Total Electric $166 $743,000 $116 $439,000 $143 $1,182,000
Gas $74 $329,000 $64 $242,000 $69 $571,000
Water $82 $367,000 $82 $311,000 $82 $678,000
Phone / Mobile $110 $492,000 $110 $416,000 $110 $908,000 Video (streaming, cable, satellite) $91
$407,000 $91 $344,000 $91 $751,000
Total Per Month $523 $2,338,000 $463 $1,752,000 $496 $4,090,000 Annual Utility Cost $28,100,000 $21,000,000 $49,100,000 Monthly UUT from Residential
1% UUT 1% $5.20 $23,400 $4.60 $17,500 $5.00 $40,900
5% UUT 5% $26.10 $116,900 $23.20 $87,600 $24.80 $204,500 7% UUT 7% $36.60 $163,700 $32.40 $122,600 $34.70 $286,300 7% UUT, Full Exemption 7% $36.60 $163,700 $0.00 $0 $19.80 $163,700 7% UUT, 3.5% Rate 7% $36.60 $163,700 $16.20 $61,300 $27.30 $225,000 7% UUT, PG&E Exemption 7% $36.60 $163,700 $19.80 $75,000 $28.90 $238,700 (1) Reflects the number of occupied housing units per DOF as of January 1, 2025. See note 3 regarding estimated PG&E CARE participation.

Non-PG&E Care / Non-Senior PG&E Care + All Seniors (3) All Households (3) Estimated based upon data available from the California Low Income Oversight Board and U.S. Census data for the City of Marina. (2) See Table 3 for information on estimated monthly cost per household. PG&E Care + Senior column utility costs reflects a weighted average of non-PG&E Care and PG&E Care rates.

Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: UUT estimate 6-11-26; Res UUT all srs; 6/11/2026; dd: Page 5 of 8 Table 3
Per Household Utility Cost Estimate
City of Marina, C

A DRAFT
Full PG&E Rates
PG&E Care
Program Rate
Electric
Average Usage per Household Per Month, Marina (1) 384 384 kWh, Marina-specific data Cost per kWh (2) $0.37 $0.22
Average Cost Per Month for Usage $142 $84
Base Services Fee $24 $6
Estimated Average Monthly Electric Cost $166 $90 avg (will vary seasonally) Gas Cost
Average Usage per Household Per Month (1) 30.417 30.417 Therms, Marina-specific data Cost per Therm $2.42 $1.93 PG&E Tier 1 rate as of 2/1/26 Estimated Average Cost Per Month $74 $59 avg (will vary seasonally) Total Electric and Gas $240 $148 avg (will vary seasonally) Water (3) $82 $82 Per MCWD
Phone / Mobile Providers (4) $110 $110
Streaming / Cable TV / Direct TV $91 $91 uses local + national data (5) Internet not included not included Not allowed to apply UUT Estimated Utility Cost Subject to UUT $523 $431
Notes:
(1) Reflects average usage for residential customers in Zip Code 93933 for 2025 as reported by PG&E. (2) Adjusts current rates to account for estimated effect of recent changes to PG&E rate structure, with a higher base fee but lower usage rates. (3) Estimate provided by MCWD for typical single family home in Marina. (5) Average per household expenditure for Cable and Direct TV ($45 per month) is calculated from 2025 gross revenues for the City of Marina derived from Franchise Fee collections.

Data on per household streaming service expenditures ($46 per month) reflects a national average reported by Forbes. (4) Reflects average U.S. household expenditure per DoxoInsights of $120 per month, adjusted to $110 to provide a conservative estimate given Marina-specific data is not available.

Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: UUT estimate 6-11-26; Res Utility Costs; 6/11/2026; dd: Page 6 of 8 Table 4
Commercial Utility User Tax Estimate
City of Marina, C

A DRAFT
Commercial Note
Electric
Aggregate Annual Commercial Electric Use 43,000,000 Extrapolated from one month of use data per PG&E (other months not disclosed) Estimated Average Cost per kWh (2) $0.25 Blended commercial/industrial rate assumption Estimated Total Annual Cost $10,750,000
Gas Cost
Aggregate Annual Gas Use - 2025 908,000 Therms, actual use for Marina per PG&E Cost per Therm (2) $2.00 Blended commercial rate assumption Estimated Average Cost Per Month $1,816,000
Water (3)
Total Annual Water Sales $17,755,955 2024-25 CAFR for MCWD Portion of Water Use in City of Marina 53% Calculated from MCWD data on consumption by area.

Estimated water sales in City of Marina $9,452,000 Total x 53% Less: Portion Included in Residential Estimate ($8,124,000) Monthly Estimate from Table 2 x 12 Estimated Commercial Water Use $1,328,000 Balance of estimated Marina water sales Phone / Mobile, Cable, Internet, Streaming not estimated Likely more limited expense for commercial customers.

Estimated Aggregate Commercial Utility Cost $13,894,000 Annual UUT - Commercial @1% $140,000
Annual UUT - Commercial @5% $690,000
Annual UUT - Commercial @7% $970,000
Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: UUT estimate 6-11-26; Commercial UUT; 6/11/2026; dd: Page 7 of 8 Table 5
Utility User Tax Applicability and Exemptions for Nearby Cities City of Marina, CA
City UUT Rate Exemptions Gas Electric
Phone /
Mobile Water Sewer Cable Streaming
Waste
Services
Monterey 2% Residential
5% Non-Residential
Any person using electrical and gas services
who qualifies for and participates in the local
electrical and gas corporation “Low Income
Rate Assistance” program (LIRA).

XX X X
Pacific
Grove
5% Enrolled in Social Security Administration's
Supplemental Security Income Program for
the Aged, Blind and Disabled (Title XVI,
Social Security Act, as amended) and have
household income less than $12,000 per
year.

XX X X X
Salinas 6%: electric, gas,
water
5% phone, cable
Head of a household is sixty-five years old or
older.

X X X X X may fall
under "video
services"
Santa Cruz 8.50% Seniors and PG&E CARE program
enrollees: exempts first $100 per month of
electricity and gas charges.

X X X X X X may fall
under "video"
X
Watsonville 5.5%:
telecommunications /
video; 6%: water, gas,
electric
Gas and electric exemptions:
a) PG&E CARE Program enrollees
b) 65 years old or older and head of the
household;
c) Eligible for Social Security
Administration’s Supplemental Income
Program for the Aged, Blind and Disabled

XX X X X X
Seaside 6% a) 65 years old or older or
b) Eligible for Social Security
Administration’s Supplemental Income
Program for the Aged, Blind and Disabled

XX X X X
Applicability of Utility User Ta
x
Prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.

Filename: UUT estimate 6-11-26; applicability; 6/11/2026; dd: Page 8 of 8 June 11, 2026 Item No. 13b

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 16, 2026

CITY COUNCIL TO RECEIVE PRESENTATION FROM TRIPEPI SMITH

REGARDING THE COMMUNITY FEEDBACK FORM AND PROVIDE

DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING RESERVATION ROAD AND DEL

MONTE BOULEVARD CORRIDORS AND DEL MONTE AND RESERVATION INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS.

REQUEST:

It is requested that the City Council:

1. Receive an informational update and presentation from Tripepi Smith regarding the community feedback form results; and

2. Receive presentation from Kimley -Horn regarding roundabout designs, traffic flow and traffic safety; and

3. Provide directions to city staff regarding short- and long-term improvements to downtown Marina, including pedestrian and bicyclist improvements and other enhancements to the Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard corridors and the Del Monte and Reservation intersection.

DISCUSSION:

One of the City Council’s priorities has been making improvements to Downtown Marina . In 2025 the City Council approved a new streetscape plan for Del Monte Boulevard that includes new median improvements from Highway 1 to Reservation Road which includes future roundabouts at the Reindollar and Palm Avenue intersections. The Del Monte B oulevard median improvements were put on temporary hold pending community workshops and outreach regarding a roundabout at the Del Monte-Reservation Road intersection and potential new streetscape plan along Reservation Road from Del Monte to California Ave that includes traffic calming, new bicycle and pedestrian improvements and roundabouts.

Staff needs direction whether to move forward with the proposed roundabout design at Del Monte and Reservation intersection or to make improvements to the existing signal and pedestrian crossing.

(EXHIBIT A) contains the Executive Summary of the Downtown Community Outreach form that will be presented.

The following is information from previous community workshops and meetings:

• (EXHIBIT B) May 2025: Council presentation by Kimley-Horn on the Reservation Road corridor study.
• (EXHIBIT C) March 24: “From Vision to Action: Shaping Marina Together” in-person workshop facilitated by Tripepi Smith; 52 residents present. • (EXHIBIT D) April 21: Presentation to Council by Tripepi Smith on findings from the March 24 workshop.
• (EXHIBIT E) May 19: Adoption of the Vision Zero Safety Action Plan

CONCLUSION:

This request is submitted for City Council consideration and comment.

Cyrah Caburian
Executive Assistant
City of Marina

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

Attachments:

Exhibit A – City of Marina Downtown Community Outreach Summary Exhibit B – Kimley-Horn Reservation Road Corridor Study Exhibit C – “From Vision to Action: Shaping Marina Together” Presentation Exhibit D – Tripepi Smith Presentation on March 24 Workshop Exhibit E – TAMC Vision Zero Safety Action Plan

City of Marina
Downtown Community Outreach Summary

1 Executive Summary
Between March-June 2026, the City of Marina led a community outreach campaign to gather public input on the community’s priorities for the future of downtown Marina. This effort centered on how residents would like to see the city go “from vision to action” in implementing the adopted Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan.

Partnering with Tripepi Smith and other consulting partners, the City hosted an in-person community workshop on March 24 and opened an online feedback form from May 26-June 9. The City promoted these opportunities across its communications channels, including in its monthly e- newsletter, website, social media (boosted posts), printed flyers and public meeting announcements.

Overall, the city received a robust response from the community: 52 residents attended the workshop, and 231 respondents completed the feedback form. Taken together, the feedback provides valuable insights into the community’s priorities for the Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard corridors and vision for a vibrant, safe and welcoming downtown.

Summary of Feedback
Across both the workshop and the feedback form, residents expressed a strong desire to transform the Del Monte Boulevard and Reservation Road corridors from car-centric thoroughfares into a more cohesive, welcoming downtown. The following themes emerged as the top community priorities:

• Creating Gathering Spaces: A significant majority of form respondents (69.7%) said it is "very important" to create a downtown where people can gather and socialize rather than just drive through. Workshop participants echoed this, requesting town squares, plazas and spaces for community events like farmers markets and festivals.

• Improving Aesthetics and Streetscapes: Enhancing streetscapes and aesthetics was identified as the top priority for the next 1-5 years by 66.2% of form respondents. Both workshop attendees and form respondents noted that the current environment is dominated by large parking lots and lacks visual appeal, emphasizing the need for more tree planting, landscaping and façade improvements.

• Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety as a Core Priority: Making the area safer for non-vehicular traffic is widely supported. In the form, 62.8% of respondents rated making downtown more walkable and bike-friendly as "very important". To increase the sense of safety, 52.4% of form respondents want safer crosswalks, 46.3% want dedicated bike lanes, and 40.3% requested wider sidewalks. Workshop participants similarly prioritized better multimodal connections and highly visible pedestrian crossings.

• Traffic Calming: A combined 66.7% of form respondents strongly support or support reducing traffic speeds to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety.

EXHIBIT A
City of Marina
Downtown Community Outreach Summary

2 • Divergent Views on Intersection Design and Roundabouts: While there is majority consensus on slowing traffic, the mechanisms for doing so remain a point of debate. Workshop participants demonstrated limited support for roundabouts, frequently expressing a preference for traditional signalized intersections. In the online form, 51.9% of respondents cited “potential to improve traffic flow” as a primary influence in their opinion of roundabouts., while 49.8% of respondents cited "concerns about driver confusion” as a primary influencer. When asked directly about using roundabouts as a circulation tool downtown, the form revealed polarized opinions that leaned overall towards support: 35.9% strongly support them, while 20.8% strongly oppose them.

• Thoughtful Development and Business Expansion: The community wants an influx of new businesses but prefers to maintain Marina's unique, approachable scale. When asked what businesses they want most, form respondents overwhelmingly chose restaurants and cafés (76.2%), followed by arts, cultural, and family-friendly spaces (58.4%), and entertainment/nightlife (48.1%). Workshop discussions highlighted a preference for "horizontal mixed-use" development. Residents advised against overly dense or urbanized vertical developments, suggesting that any vertical mixed-use be limited to preserve visual openness and the city's character.

• Strategic Implementation and Next Steps: A recurring theme in the workshop was the community's desire to see visible action in the near term. Because larger infrastructure overhauls require long-term planning and funding, residents are eager for shorter-term, lower-cost improvements such as streetscape beautification, improved lighting and enhanced crosswalk striping.

Conclusion & Recommendations
The workshop and feedback form reinforced a clear direction from the community: future improvements to the Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard corridors should prioritize safety, walkability and overall quality of experience, while remaining consistent with Marina’s character. Residents also emphasized the importance of taking action in the near term, alongside continued planning for larger, long-term investments.

To effectively address community hesitation regarding roundabouts, the City should implement a multi- pronged educational campaign focused on building trust and familiarity. This approach should prioritize transparent data sharing and visual simulations to clearly demonstrate the safety and traffic flow benefits of any proposed changes. Additionally, targeted public awareness initiatives should be launched to educate residents on the rules of navigating roundabouts. Finally, for any future roundabout projects downtown, a phased rollout that includes temporary "quick-build" demonstrations could allow the community to comfortably experience the new traffic patterns before any permanent infrastructure is constructed.

The input from this outreach effort will help inform the City’s ongoing efforts to refine priorities, evaluate options and consider next steps in a way that reflects community values and supports a vibrant, functional downtown.

Reservation Road
Corridor Study
May 2025

EXHIBIT B
Downtown Vitalization Specific Plan
• Goal M-1:
• Mobility - A downtown with safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation that encourages people to gather, walk, cycle, or use public transportation.
• Policy M-1.17
• Support the implementation of roundabouts and lane
reductions on Del Monte Boulevard. Similarly, continue to evaluate the
feasibility of lane reductions on Reservation
Road to calm the flow of traffic and further the City’s goal of creating more inviting streetscapes.
2 Reservation Corridor Study Objectives
Determine an optimal Reservation Road streetscape design to achieve the vision and goals of downtown Marina

1. Test the feasibility of roundabouts along the corridor

2. Enhance access and safety for all users

3. Create a thriving downtown environment consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan

4. Maintain acceptable traffic operations
Corridor Study Overview

1. Corridor Alternatives (Signal vs Roundabout)

2. Corridor Analysis Results

3. Recommendations
Downtown
Marina
Del Monte Blvd Future
Roundabouts at Marina
Station Development
Del Monte Blvd
Future Roundabouts
& Landscape Medians
Test Roundabout Feasibility
Along Reservation Rd
Existing Roundabouts
Project Study Area
Existing RoundaboutsExisting Roundabouts

Downtown
Marina
Project Study Area
Future Roundabout
Corridors

1. Corridor Alternatives

1. History of Del Monte/Reservation & Reservation Rd Corridor

2. Signal Control (Analysis from 2019 Downtown SP Study) • 4 Lane Road
• 2 Lane Road

3. Roundabout Control (Current Study)
• 2+ Lane Road
• 4 Lane Road
• 2 Lane Road (Interim Solution)
7 Corridor Alternatives
Signal Control – Option 1
Roundabout Control – Option 2
8 Reservation
California
Del Monte
Crescent
De Forest
Marina Square
Seacrest
Vista Del Camino
Signal Corridor (4-Lane Existing)
Del Monte to Vista Del Camino
106-ft Cross-Section
90-ft Curb-to-curb
9 Reservation
California
Del Monte Posted Speed: 35-mph
85th % Speed: 39-mph
Signal Corridor (4-Lane Existing)
Vista Del Camino to Crescent
113-ft Cross-Section
95-ft Curb-to-curb
10 California
Del Monte Posted Speed: 35-mph
85th % Speed: 39-mph
Reservation
Signal Corridor (4-Lane Existing)
Crescent to California
110-ft Cross-Section
90-ft Curb-to-curb
11 Reservation
California
Del Monte Posted Speed: 45-mph
85th % Speed: 43-mph

WIDE ROADWAY
& FAST SPEEDS
Downtown Specific Plan – Mobility
12 Downtown Specific Plan – Mobility
13 Features
incorporated with
roundabout
corridor
Speed Reduction Measure
Roundabout Corridor
Del Monte to Vista Del Camino
14 4-Lane Section

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES
Roundabout Corridor
Vista Del Camino to Crescent
3-Lane & 4-Lane Section
15 CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES
Roundabout Corridor
Crescent to California
16 2-Lane Section

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES
Del Monte / Reservation
17 TAMC Rail
Monterey
Recreation
Trail
MST Bus Stop
Starbucks
Bill Ring Corner

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES
RRFB signs at all
bike/ped crossings
2-stage crossings
with median refuge

2. Corridor Analysis Results
18 Traffic Operations
• 2040 AM & PM Peak Volumes
• Includes Downtown Specific Plan
• Traffic simulation model and analysis using SIDRA & VISSIM • Ideal tool for roundabout vs signal comparison
• Intersection vehicle delay, queues, level of service
• Roadway travel times, speeds
• Model bike, pedestrian, transit activity
19 Operations Summary
Signal Control – Option 1
Roundabout Control – Option 2
20 Reservation
C D

AM LOS PM LOS
LOS Ranking A to F
LOS D is City Standard

B C B B B B C C C C B B

B C A B A B A B A B B B A B
California
Del Monte
Crescent
De Forest
Marina Square
Seacrest
Vista Del Camino
Average Travel Times (Eastbound)
21 California
Del Monte
Crescent
De Forest
Marina Square
Seacrest
Vista Del Camino
AM PM
1-Mile Corridor
3m35s (15mph) 4m4s (14mph)
2m41s (22mph) 2m48s (21mph)
Reservation
Signal Control – Option 1
Roundabout Control – Option 2
Average Travel Times (Westbound)
22 California
Del Monte
Crescent
De Forest
Marina Square
Seacrest
Vista Del Camino
AM PM
1-Mile Corridor
4m7s (18mph) 5m2s (14mph)
2m31s (21mph) 3m8s (17mph)
Reservation
Signal Control – Option 1
Roundabout Control – Option 2
VISSIM Simulations
23 24
Year 2040 PM Peak

3. Recommendations
25 Corridor Summary – Safety
26 Criteria Signal
Option
Roundabout
Option Notes
Collision Severity
Potential High Low
Signal: High speed, 32 vehicle conflict
points at intersection
RAB: Low Speed, 8 vehicle conflict points
at intersection
Bicycle Access
Improvement Moderate High Signal: Protected Class II & IV facilities RAB: Separated Class I & IV facilities
Pedestrian Access
Improvement Moderate High
Signal: Long crossing exposure in road
RAB: Shorter crossing exposure & 2-stage
crosswalk movements
Downtown SP
Consistency for
Traffic Calming
Moderate High RAB: Provides lane reductions, bulb-outs, landscaping, reduced speeds
Downtown SP
Consistency for
Active Transportation
Moderate High RAB: Reduced speeds accommodate bike,
ped, and transit use on corridor
Corridor Summary – Operations
27 Criteria Signal
Option
Roundabout
Option Notes
Vehicle Delay Moderate Moderate Signal: Standing queues RAB: Moving queues
Travel Time Along
Corridor Moderate Low Signal: Standing queues
RAB: Moving queues
Transit & Emergency
Vehicle Access
Improvement
Moderate Moderate Transit and Emergency access maintained Driver Adaptation
Time Low Moderate Signal: Existing condition
RAB: Installed on other city streets
Driveway Impacts Low Moderate Signal: Existing driveways maintained RAB: Right turn only access
Corridor Summary – Economic
28 Criteria Signal
Option
Roundabout
Option Notes
Capital Construction
Cost Moderate to High High
Signal: Downtown SP cross-section
requires reconstruction
RAB: New infrastructure
Right of Way Impact Low Moderate
Signal: Downtown SP cross-section
requires reconstruction
RAB: New infrastructure, ROW impacts to
corner properties
Ongoing Operation
& Maintenance Cost High Moderate Signal: Electricity & equipment RAB: Landscaping
Environmental
Benefit Moderate High Roundabouts promote active
transportation and improved safety
Grant Funding
Availability Moderate to Low High Roundabouts promote active transportation and improved safety
Analysis Summary
• A roundabout at Reservation / Del Monte intersection is feasible • A roundabout corridor along Reservation Rd is feasible • Interim Condition:
• 2-lane roadway and single-lane roundabouts with turn lanes • 4-lane right of way
• Partial buildout of Downtown Specific Plan
• Ultimate Condition:
• 4-lane roadway and multi-lane roundabouts
• Full buildout of Downtown Specific Plan
29 Next Steps & Discussion
30 31
Driveway Access
32 California
Del Monte
Crescent
De Forest
Marina Square
Seacrest
Vista Del Camino
Vista Del Camino
Full Access
Right-in / Right-out Access
Driveway closure
Pedestrian Crossing Exposure
33 2-Lane Section
90-ft
60-ft
Reservation
Crescent
Reservation
Crescent
Roundabout Corridor
Interim & Ultimate Cross-Sections
Interim
34 Ultimate
Parking access behind
building frontage with
DVSP redevelopment
Roundabout Corridor
Interim & Ultimate Cross-Sections
35 Interim
Ultimate
Parking access behind
building frontage with
DVSP redevelopment
Del Monte / Reservation Queues
36 250-ft queue (PM)

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES
Year 2040 vehicle queues in EB
and WB directions do not
spillback onto Del Monte or
Vista Del Camino intersections
380-ft queue (PM)
Multi-Lane Roundabouts
37 Beach/Pacific (Santa Cruz)
Alisal/Skyway (Salinas)
Multi-Lane Roundabouts
38SR1/ SR68 / 17 Mile Drive (Monterey)

Del Monte / Reservation
Del Monte Blvd
Reservation Rd
Existing Signal with Bike/Ped

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES
Del Monte / Reservation
Del Monte Blvd
Roundabout Signal with Bike/Ped

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES
Del Monte / Reservation
41 CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES
Proposed Del Monte
Blvd Median Landscaping
Starbucks Bill Ring Corner
Median changes with
roundabout layout
Roundabout Control
• Traffic Control - Yield at entry
• Traffic Deflection – Vehicles directed
into One-way counterclockwise flow
• Geometrics – Circular road & entry
angles designed to slow vehicle
speeds
Source: FHWA

Roundabout Control
Source: FHWA
RoundaboutTypical 4-leg Intersection
32 Conflict Points
Potential collisions are high
severity broadside or head-on
impacts
8 Conflict Points
Potential collisions are low
severity sideswipe or rear-end
impacts

LOW SPEED

HIGH SPEED
Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation

Source: Mark Doctor, P.E., FHWA Resource Center
Roundabouts are Good for Older Drivers
• Lower Speeds through roundabout
• Forgiving, mistakes not lethal
• Longer decision-making time
• No demand to accurately judge closing speeds of fast traffic • Low energy crashes
• No wide visual scans
• Simple decision-making
• By 2020, the 85-percentile design driver will be someone aged 65 or older

Benefits Comparison
Roundabout Traffic Signals
Vehicle and
Driver Safety
Eliminates high-speed crashes and reduces fatalities
and injuries by 70+%
Numerous vehicle and pedestrian conflict points on standard intersection (32 vehicle/24 pedestrian)
Pedestrian and
Bicyclist Safety
Shorter one-directional crossings provide greater
pedestrian focus and awareness
Vehicles are more focused on signal changes than on
pedestrian movements
Space/
Development
Footprint
Reduces additional right-of-way between links of
intersections
May require additional turn lanes in future if traffic volumes or traffic patterns change
Cost and
Sustainability
Less expensive than a signal for greenfield construction (new location)
Increase in fuel consumption and emissions due to stopped and delayed vehicles during red lights
Traffic Capacity Creates equal priority for all approaches Typically prioritizes mainline traffic allowing progression of high volumes approaches
Access
Management
Provides equal priority of driveway/business access Requires drivers to make additional left turns or right turns to access certain properties/businesses
Aesthetics
Provides attractive entries and gateways to
communities
Various lighting and signing distractions can impact the overall aesthetic appeal for the user
Maintenance Pavement markings, lighting, and some landscape maintenance may be more intensive than signals
Requires staff time required to maintain signals, provide retiming, and conduct repair
Roundabout Perception
Source: US Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration

• Pedestrian experiences an exaggerated level of
security because the signals tell them it’s safe to
cross
• Most crashes occur when drivers turn left or right
across the crosswalk while the pedestrian has a
walk indication
Safety vs. Security at Signalized
Intersections
• Pedestrian feeling of security more
closely matches their actual level of
safety
Safety vs. Security at Roundabouts
50 Intersection
Intersection Geometry Notes
(Entry Lanes)
2040 Future Conditions
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
NB SB EB WB Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Del Monte Ave & Reservation Rd L,T,R,R L,L,T,TR TL,TR L,L,T,R 26.1 C 29.9 D 2 Reservation Rd & Vista Del Camino TL, R TL, R L, T, TR L,T,T,R 14.5 B 22.7 C 3 Reservation Rd & Seacrest Ave L, R N/A T,T,R L,T,T 11.8 B 13.5 B 4 Reservation Rd & Shopping Center LTR TL,R L,T,TR T,T,R 10.2 B 11.3 B 5 Reservation Rd & De Forest Rd TL, R LTR L,T,T,R L,T,T,R 25.5 C 21.4 C 6 Reservation Rd & Cresent Ave TL,R TL,R L,T,T,R L,T,TR 31.5 C 34.8 C 7 Reservation Rd & California Ave L,R LTR L,T,TR L,T,TR 15.0 B 13.8 B Option 1A – Signal (4-Lane Road)
Intersection
Intersection Geometry Notes
(Entry Lanes)
2040 Future Conditions
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
NB SB EB WB Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Del Monte Ave & Reservation Rd L,T,R,R L,L,T,TR TL,TR L,L,T,R 28.9 C 32.8 C 2 Reservation Rd & Vista Del Camino TL, R TL, R L, TR L,T,R 21.9 C 42.9 D 3 Reservation Rd & Seacrest Ave L, R N/A T,R L,T 15.3 B 26.1 C 4 Reservation Rd & Shopping Center LTR TL,R L,TR T,R 13.9 B 19.0 B 5 Reservation Rd & De Forest Rd TL, R LTR L,T,R L,T,R 32.6 C 30.8 C 6 Reservation Rd & Cresent Ave TL,R TL,R L,T,T,R L,T,TR 31.4 C 34.5 C 7 Reservation Rd & California Ave L,R LTR L,T,TR L,T,TR 15.0 B 13.8 B Option 1B – Signal & Road Diet (2-Lane Road)
Acceptable operations
but some left turn
pocket queue
spillback with 2-lane
road geometry
Acceptable operations
& queues with 4-lane
road geometry
Year 2040 Scenario
Year 2040 Scenario
1A - Signal (4-Lane Road) 1B - Signal (2-Lane Road)
52 Option 2C - 2-Lane Road & Single-Lane Roundabouts with Turn Lanes Option 2A - 4-Lane Road & Multi-Lane Roundabouts
Option 2B - 3-Lane Road & Multi-Lane Roundabouts
Acceptable
operations, long
vehicle queues
Acceptable operations
& queues with 4-lane
road geometry
Acceptable operations
& queues with 3-lane
road geometry
Year 2040 Scenario
Intersection
Intersection Geometry Notes (#
Circulating & Entry Lanes)
2040 Future Conditions
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
NB SB EB WB Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C
1 Del Monte Ave & Reservation Rd TL, R L, TR LTR L, TR 14.2 B 0.787 16.2 B 0.744 2 Reservation Rd & Vista Del Camino LTR LTR TL, TR TL, TR 7.5 A 0.555 14.5 B 0.712 3 Reservation Rd & Seacrest Ave LTR N/A T, TR TL, T 7.2 A 0.387 10.6 B 0.629 4 Reservation Rd & Shopping Center LTR LTR TL, TR TL, TR 6.3 A 0.354 7.5 A 0.463 5 Reservation Rd & De Forest Rd LTR LTR TL, TR TL, TR 6.6 A 0.376 7.8 A 0.463 6 Reservation Rd & Cresent Ave LTR LTR TL, TR TL, TR 7.7 A 0.417 9.8 A 0.584 7 Reservation Rd & California Ave LTR LTR TL, TR TL, TR 7.6 A 0.445 7.7 A 0.427 Intersection
Intersection Geometry Notes (#
Circulating & Entry Lanes)
2040 Future Conditions
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
NB SB EB WB Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C
1 Del Monte Ave & Reservation Rd TL, R L, TR LTR L, TR 14.2 B 0.787 16.2 C 0.744 2 Reservation Rd & Vista Del Camino LTR LTR TL, TR TL, TR 7.5 A 0.407 14.5 B 0.712 3 Reservation Rd & Seacrest Ave LTR N/A T, TR L, T 8.0 A 0.562 12.5 B 0.748 4 Reservation Rd & Shopping Center LTR LTR TL, TR TL, R 7.6 A 0.556 10.6 B 0.756 5 Reservation Rd & De Forest Rd LTR LTR TL, TR TL, R 8.0 A 0.577 11.4 B 0.776 6 Reservation Rd & Cresent Ave LTR LTR TL, TR L, TR 10.5 B 0.618 14.6 B 0.793 7 Reservation Rd & California Ave LTR LTR TL, R L, TR 9.8 A 0.631 12.0 B 0.719 Intersection
Intersection Geometry Notes (#
Circulating & Entry Lanes)
2040 Future Conditions
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
NB SB EB WB Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C
1 Del Monte Ave & Reservation Rd TL, R L, TR LTR L, TR 15.7 C 0.874 21.4 C 0.947 2 Reservation Rd & Vista Del Camino LTR LTR L, TR TL, TR 8.3 A 0.584 19.9 C 0.854 3 Reservation Rd & Seacrest Ave LTR N/A T, R L, T 9.0 A 0.553 22.1 C 0.982 4 Reservation Rd & Shopping Center LTR LTR L, TR TL, R 7.5 A 0.518 10.7 B 0.731 5 Reservation Rd & De Forest Rd LTR LTR L, TR TL, R 8.9 A 0.644 11.8 B 0.715 6 Reservation Rd & Cresent Ave LTR LTR TL, R L, TR 11.6 B 0.670 20.5 C 0.947 7 Reservation Rd & California Ave LTR LTR LTR LTR 18.5 C 0.853 20.3 C 0.838 53 Option 2C - 2-Lane Road & Single-Lane Roundabouts with Turn Lanes Option 2B - 3-Lane Road & Multi-Lane Roundabouts
Acceptable
operations, long
vehicle queues
Acceptable operations
& queues with 3-lane
road geometry
Year 2040 Scenario
Intersection
Intersection Geometry Notes (#
Circulating & Entry Lanes)
2040 Future Conditions
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
NB SB EB WB Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C
1 Del Monte Ave & Reservation Rd TL, R L, TR LTR L, TR 14.2 B 0.787 16.2 C 0.744 2 Reservation Rd & Vista Del Camino LTR LTR TL, TR TL, TR 7.5 A 0.407 14.5 B 0.712 3 Reservation Rd & Seacrest Ave LTR N/A T, TR L, T 8.0 A 0.562 12.5 B 0.748 4 Reservation Rd & Shopping Center LTR LTR TL, TR TL, R 7.6 A 0.556 10.6 B 0.756 5 Reservation Rd & De Forest Rd LTR LTR TL, TR TL, R 8.0 A 0.577 11.4 B 0.776 6 Reservation Rd & Cresent Ave LTR LTR TL, TR L, TR 10.5 B 0.618 14.6 B 0.793 7 Reservation Rd & California Ave LTR LTR TL, R L, TR 9.8 A 0.631 12.0 B 0.719 Intersection
Intersection Geometry Notes (#
Circulating & Entry Lanes)
2040 Future Conditions
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
NB SB EB WB Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C
1 Del Monte Ave & Reservation Rd TL, R L, TR LTR L, TR 15.7 C 0.874 21.4 C 0.947 2 Reservation Rd & Vista Del Camino LTR LTR L, TR TL, TR 8.3 A 0.584 19.9 C 0.854 3 Reservation Rd & Seacrest Ave LTR N/A T, R L, T 9.0 A 0.553 22.1 C 0.982 4 Reservation Rd & Shopping Center LTR LTR L, TR TL, R 7.5 A 0.518 10.7 B 0.731 5 Reservation Rd & De Forest Rd LTR LTR L, TR TL, R 8.9 A 0.644 11.8 B 0.715 6 Reservation Rd & Cresent Ave LTR LTR TL, R L, TR 11.6 B 0.670 20.5 C 0.947 7 Reservation Rd & California Ave LTR LTR LTR LTR 18.5 C 0.853 20.3 C 0.838 Option 2D – 2-Lane Road & Single Lane Roundabout Operations fail & queues spillback into
adjacent intersections
with 2-lane road &
single lane geometry
Intersection
Intersection Geometry Notes (#
Circulating & Entry Lanes)
2040 Future Conditions
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
NB SB EB WB Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C
1 Del Monte Ave & Reservation Rd TL, R L, TR LTR L, TR 17.2 C 0.787 17.7 B 0.721 2 Reservation Rd & Vista Del Camino LTR LTR LTR LTR 119.4 F 1.493 257.4 F 2.090 3 Reservation Rd & Seacrest Ave LTR N/A LTR LTR 24.7 C 0.918 43.8 E 1.075 4 Reservation Rd & Shopping Center LTR LTR LTR LTR 19.0 C 0.872 75.7 F 1.271 5 Reservation Rd & De Forest Rd LTR LTR LTR LTR 12.4 B 0.708 43.2 E 1.112 6 Reservation Rd & Cresent Ave LTR LTR LTR LTR 14.9 B 0.770 27.0 D 0.966 7 Reservation Rd & California Ave LTR LTR LTR LTR 16.3 B 0.822 29.5 C 0.998 2C - 2-Lane Road & SL Roundabouts+TL2A - 4-Lane Road & ML Roundabouts 2B - 3-Lane Road & ML Roundabouts # Intersection Approach /
MVMT
Lane Length
(ft)
Dual Entry Alternative; 2-Lane Road
2040 AM Peak 2040 AM Peak
Impact? 95% Queue
(ft) Impact? 95% Queue
(ft)
1 Del Monte Ave &
Reservation Rd
NB1 450 NO 47.4 NO 48.6
NB2 450 NO 32.5 NO 106.6
SB1 1000 NO 25.1 NO 17.3
SB2 200 NO 23 NO 11.2
EB1 1000 NO 124.1 NO 191.7
WB1 590 NO 40.9 NO 69
WB2 590 NO 47.8 NO 108.6
2 Reservation Rd &
Vista Del Camino
NB 100 NO 11.5 NO 48
SB 500 NO 17.1 NO 86.2
EB1 585 NO 11.9 NO 24.8
EB2 585 NO 54.9 NO 254.8
WB1 460 NO 24.4 NO 66.3
WB2 460 NO 29.9 NO 66.9
3 Reservation Rd &
Seacrest Ave
NB 200 NO 39.6 YES 220.9
EB1 460 NO 50.3 NO 147.3
EB2 460 NO 12.2 NO 17.3
WB1 470 NO 14.3 NO 23.2
WB2 470 NO 46.6 NO 108
4 Reservation Rd &
Shopping Center
NB 50 NO 1 NO 2.6
SB 150 NO 24 NO 20.8
EB1 470 NO 7.6 NO 8.2
EB2 470 NO 52.2 NO 93.1
WB1 210 NO 38.4 NO 64.8
WB2 210 NO 7.8 NO 6.2
5 Reservation Rd &
De Forest Rd
NB 200 NO 6.4 NO 39.5
SB 100 NO 27.3 NO 22.5
EB1 210 NO 69 NO 87.1
EB2 210 NO 1.9 NO 7.8
WB1 470 NO 41.7 NO 68.7
WB2 470 NO 6.8 NO 5
6 Reservation Rd &
Cresent Ave
NB 150 NO 58.1 YES 179.9
SB 150 NO 16.6 NO 11.5
EB1 470 NO 70.8 NO 145.2
EB2 470 NO 5.7 NO 9.5
WB1 500 NO 6.6 NO 13.4
WB2 500 NO 52.4 NO 120.5
7 Reservation Rd &
California Ave
NB 280 NO 75.3 NO 73.3
SB 50 NO 0.5 NO 1.3
EB1 350 NO 277.6 NO 229.9
EB2 350 NO NO
WB1 500 NO 89.5 NO 205.2
WB2 500 NO NO
# Intersection Approach /
MVMT
Lane Length
(ft)
Dual Entry Alternative; 3-Lane Road
2040 AM Peak 2040 AM Peak
Impact? 95% Queue
(ft) Impact? 95% Queue
(ft)
1 Del Monte Ave &
Reservation Rd
NB1 450 NO 44.9 NO 40.2
NB2 450 NO 31.3 NO 94
SB1 1000 NO 25.8 NO 14.1
SB2 200 NO 21.6 NO 9.1
EB1 1000 NO 73 NO 76
WB1 590 NO 36.4 NO 40.2
WB2 590 NO 30.8 NO 100.1
2 Reservation Rd &
Vista Del Camino
NB 100 NO 7.5 NO 22
SB 500 NO 12.8 NO 51.2
EB1 585 NO 23.1 NO 61.8
EB2 585 NO 23.1 NO 61.8
WB1 460 NO 20.2 NO 62.2
WB2 460 NO 20.2 NO 62.2
3 Reservation Rd &
Seacrest Ave
NB 200 NO 17.5 NO 43.6
EB1 460 NO 21.4 NO 31.9
EB2 460 NO 21.4 NO 31.9
WB1 470 NO 6.7 NO 10.9
WB2 470 NO 39.5 NO 143
4 Reservation Rd &
Shopping Center
NB 50 NO 0.7 NO 1.4
SB 150 NO 17.6 NO 11.5
EB1 470 NO 19.8 NO 30.1
EB2 470 NO 19.8 NO 30.1
WB1 210 NO 40.9 NO 83.2
WB2 210 NO 4 NO 3.2
5 Reservation Rd &
De Forest Rd
NB 200 NO 2.3 NO 11.8
SB 100 NO 19 NO 11.2
EB1 210 NO 20.7 NO 29.3
EB2 210 NO 20.7 NO 29.3
WB1 470 NO 47.5 NO 137.1
WB2 470 NO 3.6 NO 2.4
6 Reservation Rd &
Cresent Ave
NB 150 NO 20 NO 34.9
SB 150 NO 9.9 NO 6.2
EB1 470 NO 38.1 NO 82.5
EB2 470 NO 13.4 NO 17
WB1 500 NO 3.1 NO 6.1
WB2 500 NO 48.7 NO 190.8
7 Reservation Rd &
California Ave
NB 280 NO 32.1 NO 27.5
SB 50 NO 0.2 NO 0.3
EB1 350 NO 50.2 NO 86.2
EB2 350 NO 11 NO 5.8
WB1 500 NO 6.2 NO 5.5
WB2 500 NO 42.7 NO 69.1
# Intersection Approach /
MVMT
Lane Length
(ft)
Dual Entry Alternative; 4-Lane Road
2040 AM Peak 2040 AM Peak
Impact? 95% Queue
(ft) Impact? 95% Queue
(ft)
1 Del Monte Ave &
Reservation Rd
NB1 450 NO 111.7 NO 100
NB2 450 NO 80.2 NO 278.8
SB1 1000 NO 56.8 NO 31.7
SB2 200 NO 47.8 NO 20.9
EB1 1000 NO 165.2 NO 173.9
WB1 590 NO 86.8 NO 96.4
WB2 590 NO 73.3 NO 238.6
2 Reservation Rd &
Vista Del Camino
NB 100 NO 18.6 NO 54.7
SB 500 NO 31.9 NO 127.3
EB1 585 NO 95.8 NO 469
EB2 585 NO 30.7 NO 48
WB1 460 NO 50.1 NO 154.8
WB2 460 NO 50.1 NO 154.8
3 Reservation Rd &
Seacrest Ave
NB 200 NO 43.4 NO 108.3
EB1 460 NO 87.6 NO 282.5
EB2 460 NO 28.9 NO 40.7
WB1 470 NO 78.1 NO 241.4
WB2 470 NO 25.7 NO 37.1
4 Reservation Rd &
Shopping Center
NB 50 NO 1.7 NO 3.4
SB 150 NO 31 NO 21.1
EB1 470 NO 80.8 NO 137.4
EB2 470 NO 26.7 NO 37.8
WB1 210 NO 68.9 NO 106.3
WB2 210 NO 23.9 NO 32.5
5 Reservation Rd &
De Forest Rd
NB 200 NO 5.6 NO 29.1
SB 100 NO 35 NO 20.9
EB1 210 NO 81.3 NO 124.6
EB2 210 NO 29.6 NO 39.5
WB1 470 NO 72.5 NO 93.9
WB2 470 NO 26.5 NO 32.7
6 Reservation Rd &
Cresent Ave
NB 150 NO 49.7 NO 86.8
SB 150 NO 24.5 NO 15.4
EB1 470 NO 94.8 NO 205.3
EB2 470 NO 33.4 NO 42.2
WB1 500 NO 70.8 NO 174.1
WB2 500 NO 26.8 NO 38.3
7 Reservation Rd &
California Ave
NB 280 NO 59.9 NO 50.5
SB 50 NO 0.5 NO 0.8
EB1 350 NO 104.7 NO 104.8
EB2 350 NO 35.5 NO 35.3
WB1 500 NO 77 NO 92.8
WB2 500 NO 28.2 NO 32.5
2D - 2-Lane Road & SL Roundabouts
# Intersection Approach /
MVMT
Lane Length
(ft)
Single Lane Alternative; 2-Lane Road
2040 AM Peak 2040 AM Peak
Impact? 95% Queue
(ft) Impact? 95% Queue
(ft)
1 Del Monte Ave &
Reservation Rd
NB1 450 NO 111.7 NO 100
NB2 450 NO 80.2 NO 278.8
SB1 1000 NO 56.8 NO 31.7
SB2 200 NO 47.8 NO 20.9
EB1 1000 NO 165.2 NO 173.9
WB1 590 NO 86.8 NO 96.4
WB2 590 NO 73.3 NO 238.6
2 Reservation Rd &
Vista Del Camino
NB 100 NO 24.9 NO 62.7
SB 500 NO 45.2 NO 148.9
EB1 585 YES 738.7 YES 2901.7
EB2 585
WB1 460 YES 507.3 YES 2664
WB2 460
3 Reservation Rd &
Seacrest Ave
NB 200 NO 60.8 NO 147.3
EB1 460 YES 570.2 YES 2009.6
EB2 460
WB1 470 NO 370.9 YES 1653.3
WB2 470
4 Reservation Rd &
Shopping Center
NB 50 NO 2.2 NO 4.7
SB 150 NO 43.7 NO 28.6
EB1 470 NO 217.3 YES 1215.2
EB2 470
WB1 210 NO 168.3 YES 733.1
WB2 210
5 Reservation Rd &
De Forest Rd
NB 200 NO 7.5 NO 40.6
SB 100 NO 47.2 NO 27.7
EB1 210 YES 417.6 YES 1337.7
EB2 210
WB1 470 NO 184.4 YES 558.4
WB2 470
6 Reservation Rd &
Cresent Ave
NB 150 NO 68.9 NO 125
SB 150 NO 33.4 NO 20.7
EB1 470 YES 722.3 YES 1814.2
EB2 470
WB1 500 NO 283 YES 1222.9
WB2 500
7 Reservation Rd &
California Ave
NB 280 NO 79.8 NO 68.4
SB 50 NO 0.6 NO 1.1
EB1 350 YES 886.9 YES 819.3
EB2 350
WB1 500 NO 196.2 YES 600.1
WB2 500
# Intersection Approach /
MVMT
Lane Length
(ft)
Dual Lane Alternative; 4-Lane Road
2040 AM Peak 2040 AM Peak
Impact? 95% Queue
(ft) Impact? 95% Queue
(ft)
1 Del Monte Ave &
Reservation Rd
NBL 450 NO 111.7 NO 100
NBR 450 NO 80.2 NO 278.8
NBR2 1000 NO 56.8 NO 31.7
SBL 200 NO 47.8 NO 20.9
SBL2 1000 NO 165.2 NO 173.9
EBR 590 NO 86.8 NO 96.4
WBL 590 NO 73.3 NO 238.6
2 Reservation Rd &
Vista Del Camino
NB 100 NO 18.6 NO 54.7
SB 500 NO 31.9 NO 127.3
EB1 585 NO 95.8 NO 469
EB2 585 NO 30.7 NO 48
WB1 460 NO 50.1 NO 154.8
WB2 460 NO 50.1 NO 154.8
3 Reservation Rd &
Seacrest Ave
NB 200 NO 43.4 NO 108.3
EB1 460 NO 87.6 NO 282.5
EB2 460 NO 28.9 NO 40.7
WB1 470 NO 78.1 NO 241.4
WB2 470 NO 25.7 NO 37.1
4 Reservation Rd &
Shopping Center
NB 50 NO 1.7 NO 3.4
SB 150 NO 31 NO 21.1
EB1 470 NO 80.8 NO 137.4
EB2 470 NO 26.7 NO 37.8
WB1 210 NO 68.9 NO 106.3
WB2 210 NO 23.9 NO 32.5
5 Reservation Rd &
De Forest Rd
NB 200 NO 5.6 NO 29.1
SB 100 NO 35 NO 20.9
EB1 210 NO 81.3 NO 124.6
EB2 210 NO 29.6 NO 39.5
WB1 470 NO 72.5 NO 93.9
WB2 470 NO 26.5 NO 32.7
6 Reservation Rd &
Cresent Ave
NB 150 NO 49.7 NO 86.8
SB 150 NO 24.5 NO 15.4
EB1 470 NO 94.8 NO 205.3
EB2 470 NO 33.4 NO 42.2
WB1 500 NO 70.8 NO 174.1
WB2 500 NO 26.8 NO 38.3
7 Reservation Rd &
California Ave
NB 280 NO 59.9 NO 50.5
SB 50 NO 0.5 NO 0.8
EB1 350 NO 104.7 NO 104.8
EB2 350 NO 35.5 NO 35.3
WB1 500 NO 77 NO 92.8
WB2 500 NO 28.2 NO 32.5
2A - 4-Lane Road & ML Roundabouts 2B - 3-Lane Road & ML Roundabouts # Intersection Approach /
MVMT
Lane Length
(ft)
Dual Lane Alternative; 3-Lane Road
2040 AM Peak 2040 AM Peak
Impact? 95% Queue
(ft) Impact? 95% Queue
(ft)
1 Del Monte Ave &
Reservation Rd
NBL 450 NO 111.7 NO 100
NBR 450 NO 80.2 NO 278.8
NBR2 1000 NO 56.8 NO 31.7
SBL 200 NO 47.8 NO 20.9
SBL2 1000 NO 165.2 NO 173.9
EBR 590 NO 86.8 NO 96.4
WBL 590 NO 73.3 NO 238.6
2 Reservation Rd &
Vista Del Camino
NB 100 NO 15.6 NO 48.4
SB 500 NO 31.9 NO 127.3
EB1 585 NO 57.3 NO 153.6
EB2 585 NO 57.3 NO 153.6
WB1 460 NO 45.8 NO 146
WB2 460 NO 45.8 NO 146
3 Reservation Rd &
Seacrest Ave
NB 200 NO 43.4 NO 108.3
EB1 460 NO 53.3 NO 79.4
EB2 460 NO 53.3 NO 79.4
WB1 470 NO 16.7 NO 27
WB2 470 NO 98.1 NO 355.5
4 Reservation Rd &
Shopping Center
NB 50 NO 1.7 NO 3.4
SB 150 NO 43.7 NO 28.6
EB1 470 NO 49.1 NO 74.8
EB2 470 NO 49.1 NO 74.8
WB1 210 NO 101.8 NO 206.9
WB2 210 NO 10.1 NO 8
5 Reservation Rd &
De Forest Rd
NB 200 NO 5.6 NO 29.1
SB 100 NO 47.2 NO 27.7
EB1 210 NO 51.6 NO 72.8
EB2 210 NO 51.6 NO 72.8
WB1 470 NO 118.1 NO 270.4
WB2 470 NO 9 NO 5.9
6 Reservation Rd &
Cresent Ave
NB 150 NO 49.7 NO 86.8
SB 150 NO 24.5 NO 15.4
EB1 470 NO 94.8 NO 205.3
EB2 470 NO 33.4 NO 42.2
WB1 500 NO 7.7 NO 15.3
WB2 500 NO 121.1 NO 474.5
7 Reservation Rd &
California Ave
NB 280 NO 79.8 NO 68.4
SB 50 NO 0.5 NO 0.8
EB1 350 NO 124.8 NO 214.3
EB2 350 NO 27.3 NO 14.5
WB1 500 NO 15.5 NO 13.7
WB2 500 NO 106.1 NO 171.8
Traffic Volumes
• 2040 Traffic forecasts
• From AMBAG Travel Demand Model
• Includes traffic and travel pattern changes from
• Marina Downtown Plan
• Regional growth and roadway improvements
56 Year 2018 Traffic Volumes
Reservation
538(983) 571(941)
493(955)
XX – AM Volume
(XX) – PM Volume
705(832)689(875)
1 2 3
1 2 3
57 701(555)
574(885)
705(832)
Reservation1 2 3
Year 2040 Traffic Volumes
829(1032)
766(1047)775(1065)
1 2 3
872(1099)
58 XX – AM Volume
(XX) – PM Volume
765(951)
771(967)
766(1044)
785(670)
Year 2018 Traffic Volumes
Reservation
575(962) 598(980)
705(767)757(735)
4 5 6
4 5 6
59 7
7 653(915)
706(738)
XX – AM Volume
(XX) – PM Volume
Reservation4 5 6 7
Year 2040 Traffic Volumes
876(1063)
745(962)789(925)
4 5 6
XX – AM Volume
(XX) – PM Volume
805(1072)
60 930(970)
795(932)
7 Through Volumes WB (R to SR1)
61 7,000 trips
8,750 trips 2018
10,650 trips 2040
Through Volumes EB (SR1 to R)
62 1,150 trips
9,800 trips 2018
10,099 trips 2040
From Vision to Action: Shaping
Downtown Marina Together
Reservation Road & Del Monte Blvd. Corridor(s)
Community Meeting-March 24, 2026

EXHIBIT C
Why We’re Here
• To build a shared understanding of Downtown Marina’s
opportunities and challenges, specific to Reservation Road and Del Monte Corridors.
• To explore real ideas for supporting local businesses, housing, and community spaces
• To learn from other communities that have successfully revitalized their downtowns
• To help shape priorities for safer, more vibrant streets that support the future vision
How We’re Going to Do It
Understand the Big Picture
Learn about the Downtown Specific Plan as it relates to Reservation Road and Del Monte Blvd Corridors, market realities, and examples from other communities.

Talk Together About the Vision
Small-group discussions about what you want to see in Downtown Marina.

Explore Street & Infrastructure Ideas
Review proposed improvements like complete streets and roundabouts.

Prioritize What Matters Most
Share feedback and identify common themes across the room.

Discuss Next Steps
Hear how tonight’s input will help guide future decisions.

Working Together Tonight
Respect all voices
Listen actively and allow others to finish speaking.

Share the floor
Keep comments concise so everyone at your table can participate.

Focus on the future
Center ideas on solutions and opportunities for Downtown.

Address the issue — not the person
Maintain a respectful and civil tone at all times.

Stay on topic
Help your group focus on the workshop questions so we can conclude on time.

Downtown Specific Plan
Background
Guido Persicone, Community Development Director

Downtown
Area
Downtown Specific Plan Background
• A Specific Plan is a planning tool that local governments can use to implement their General Plan and to guide development in a localized area.
• General Plan Policy 5.11 Directs staff to adopt a Downtown Specific Plan

Downtown Specific Plan Goals
• Mobility - improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation • Economic Vitality - Attracts and sustains economic activity through innovation, business and social opportunities. • Housing Affordability - a variety of affordable, high quality housing options for people to live in downtown. • Cultural Diversity - a downtown where people of all incomes, ages, abilities, races and cultures feel like they belong • Community Identity - a place that provides opportunities for an attractive built environment

Project Outreach History
• 1978 - first General Plan encouraged a downtown
• 1982 - updated General Plan encouraged more commercial space in Marina • 1986 - establishing of the Redevelopment Agency with a focus on a downtown area • 1994 - Fort Ord closes. Marina loses 21% of its population, negatively impacting downtown area
• 1998 - retail leakage report prepared; found a need for a downtown and more commercial • 2001 - revitalization of the commercial core a key Council priority • 2005 - Downtown Vision and Design Guidelines adopted
• 2006 - traffic study prepared for the downtown area; discussion of reducing to two lanes • 2011 - draft downtown plan presented to the City Council • 2018-2019 - 15 Ad Hoc Meetings; 6 Planning Commission Hearings; 2 Design Review Committee meetings; 2 City Council meetings
• 2021-Present - Affordable Housing Overlay Policy Adopted; Revised Plan • October 2024 - Downtown Specific Plan adopted by City Council

Downtown Visioning
Market Realities & Peer ReviewSandra Meyer and Barry Foster - HDL Companies

HdL EconSolutions
Market and Site Assessment
•Marina overall is undergoing significant retail and economic growth •Retail leakage to neighboring cities underscore the need for a diversified retail mix to capture local spending
•Mixed-use developments that integrate retail, and entertainment components could stimulate commercial growth.
•The Downtown/Central Marina shopping area which includes four shopping centers represent opportunities for increased density, mixed use development, pedestrian improvements, public plazas and entertainment venues.

HdL Peer Review
Marina Downtown Specific Plan
•The Specific Plan provides a road map that is aspirational in its vision for the future of downtown Marina •Transformation into an urban center envisioned in the Plan seems unlikely •With some modifications and adjustments to the Plan’s land use and development regulations a more discernable, destination oriented “downtown” could transpire.

HdL Peer Review
Marina Downtown Specific Plan
The Plan envisions new development along Reservation Rd to include mixed use buildings built to the sidewalk with ground floor retail and residential above.

HdL Peer Review
Marina Downtown Specific Plan
Recommendations:
•Explore horizontal and encourage mixed-use design alternatives to facilitate redevelopment of the suburban shopping centers in the Core area.

In terms of “vitalizing” the four existing suburban styled shopping centers, an alternative land use concept to explore might be creating horizontal mixed use narrow drive aisles/interior streets that extend though the larger shopping center parcels with one to two story commercial buildings interspersed with horizontal higher density residential on each side or behind the commercial. Or the layout could have one to two story commercial buildings on one side of the drive aisle/interior street and the residential on the other side. The interior drive aisle could have sidewalks on each side, connecting to the sidewalks on Reservation Road and Del Monte Road (in the case of the Marina Square shopping center) and to the existing crosswalks. The residential could be designed with podium or underground parking to serve both the retail and residential, thus creating a more traditional downtown feel. The Specific Plan envisions the Core District to include mixed-use buildings built to the property line (Figure 4-4) with doors and windows that face wide sidewalks with shade trees and pedestrian amenities. Development standards will require new development to provide features like lighting, public art, seating, and landscaping along building frontages to enhance the streetscape and create a pedestrian oriented, urban atmosphere. The Core will feature a mix of high-density housing and neighborhood-oriented businesses in a walkable, pedestrian-scaled environment Develop a mobility plan for the Downtown to include complete streets design, pedestrian and bicycle paths, improvements to transit, parking, and transportation demand management measures Mixed-use Node District: The Land Use Plan calls for the creation of a mixed-use node at the intersection of Reservation Road and California Avenue. HdL recommends that this District be eliminated as it seems superfluous and that those 3 parcels be rezoned to Transition with reference in the development regulations that the intersection treatment at the southwest or southeast corners contain gateway signage consistent with the Design Guidelines Gateway Signage Diagram (see below) Development Code Modifications-HDL is recommending several development code modifications to successfully implement the DVSP .

Downtown Visioning
Comparative Analysis Geary and Michelle Coats, Coats Consulting

Comparative Analysis-Downtown Areas

Morgan Hill

Breakout #1: Downtown Vision

#1 Break Out
Session

1.How often do you visit/go to the
downtown for shopping or eating?

2.When you imagine the future of
Downtown Marina, what types of
experiences would make you want to
visit more often or stay longer?

3.Do the “Real Estate Market Analysis”
and “Peer Review of the Downtown
Specific Plan” reports change your
vision for the future of downtown
development?

Infrastructure:

Reimagining the Corridor
Frederik Venter, Kimley Horn

DEL MONTE BLVD MEDIANSDOWNTOWN MARINA STREETSCAPE

EXISTING
25 Reservation
California
Del Monte
Downtown
Marina
Highway 1
Palm
Reindollar
Beach
Del Monte Blvd Future
Roundabouts at Marina
Station Development
Del Monte Blvd
Future Roundabouts
& Landscape Medians
approved by Council
Test Roundabout Feasibility
Along Reservation Rd
Existing Roundabouts
Project Study Area
Existing RoundaboutsExisting Roundabouts
Crescent
Patton Pkwy

Downtown Specific Plan – Mobility
26 Features
incorporated with
roundabout
corridor
Speed Reduction Measure
Downtown Specific Plan – Mobility
27 Roundabout Corridor
Vista Del Camino to Crescent
28 3-Lane & 4-Lane Section

CONCEPT LAYOUT FOR

ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES
Del Monte Layout
Proposed Roadway - Roundabouts
Reindolla
Reindollar to Palm (2NB,
Palm
1SB)

MONTEREYONTENEREQ

TRAILRAIL LINE LANDSCAPE BIKE

LANE BUFFER
TRAVEL
LANE
Palm to Reservation (1NB,
1SB)

MONTEREY

RAIL LINE
REC

TRAIL LANDSCAPE BIKE

LANE BUFFER TRAVEL
LANE
LANDSCAРЕ
MEDIAN
LANDSCAPЕ
MEDIAN

TRAVEL LANE BUFFER
LANDSCAАРЕ

BIKE SIDEWALK

LANDSCAPE
TRAVEL

LANE BUFFER
BIKE

LANE SIDEWALK
Made with Streetmix
Reservatio
1 Made with Streetmix
Del Monte / Reservation
Bill Ring
Corner
2-stage crossings
with median
refuge
TAMC
Rail
Monterey
Recreatio
n Trail
MST Bus
Ston
MONTE
BLVD

RESERVATION RD
RRFB signs at all
bike/ped
crossings
Starbucks
Next Slide
2 Del Monte / Reservation
Del Monte
Blyc
ว
→ →
f
ว ว
Beservatio

DEL MONTE BLVD MEDIANSDOWNTOWN MARINA STREETSCAPE

EXISTING

DEL MONTE BLVD MEDIANSDOWNTOWN MARINA STREETSCAPE
Conceptual, artistic representation, not for construction

PROPOSED VIEW

DEL MONTE BLVD MEDIANSDOWNTOWN MARINA STREETSCAPE
Conceptual, artistic representation, not for construction

NORTHBOUND VIEW

DEL MONTE BLVD MEDIANSDOWNTOWN MARINA STREETSCAPE
Conceptual, artistic representation, not for construction

SOUTHBOUND VIEW
Breakout #2: From Vision to
Design

#2 Break Out Session

1. At the intersection of Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard, which design do you feel would better support your vision for Downtown Marina?
a. A roundabout
b. A traditional signalized intersection (traffic light) c. Not sure / need more information

2. Thinking about Reservation Road as a whole, how do you feel about using roundabouts instead of traffic signals along the corridor?

3. If the City could focus on just a few improvements along Reservation Road, which street features should be the highest priority to make the corridor safer and more welcoming? a. Protected bike lanes
b. Wider sidewalks and shade trees
c. Safer pedestrian crossings
d. Landscaping and beautification
e. Other ideas
What We Heard Tonight
Prioritizing What Matters Most for Reservation Road & Del Monte Blvd. Corridor

Thank You for Your Participation
Tonight’s discussion and priorities will help guide the City’s next steps in shaping the future of Downtown Marina.

From Vision to Action: Shaping
Downtown Marina Together
March 24 Community Workshop Outcomes Overview
City Council Meeting | April 21, 2026

EXHIBIT D
Purpose & Overview Workshop
Purpose
Gather input on future of Downtown Marina
Focus on Reservation Rd & Del Monte Blvd
corridors
Inform implementation of the Downtown Specific
Plan
Overview
52 participants
Open House + facilitated breakout discussions
Supported by City staff and consultant team

What We Heard
Community Vision for Downtown
More walkable, welcoming and active
downtown
Strong support for:
• Local dining and retail
• Community spaces and events
Desire to maintain Marina’s character
Preference for horizontal, lower-scale
development
Vertical mixed-use supported cautiously
and at limited height

Reservation Rd & Del Monte Blvd
Limited support for roundabouts
Preference for signalized intersection
Concerns raised:
• Traffic flow
• Driver confusion
• Business access
Community supports phased, corridor-
specific solutions
Key Decision Point: Intersection Approach

Top Priority Across All Groups
Pedestrian & Bicyclist Safety
• Safer crossings
• Wider sidewalks
• Bike infrastructure
• Slower traffic
Key takeaway:

All improvements should prioritize safety,
regardless of design
Core Priority: Safety First

What We Heard About Moving
Forward
• Strong desire to see action in the near term
• Support for lower-cost, visible improvements
first
• Larger projects can follow as funding becomes
available
Next Steps
• Validate input through community feedback
form
• Refine options and priorities
• Return to Council with recommendations
Implementation & Next Steps

Marina

EXHIBIT E
Acknowledgments

TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

FOR MONTEREY COUNTY
Doug Bilse
Janneke Strause
Theresa Wright
Michael Zeller
Todd Muck

CITY OF MARINA STAFF
Ismael Hernandez, Public Works
NAME HERE, Public Works
NAME HERE, Police Department
NAME HERE, Fire Department

REGIONAL TASK FORCE PARTNERS
Bicycling Monterey
Blue Zones
California Highway Patrol
Caltrans
California State University
Monterey Bay
Monterey County Public
Health Department
Monterey County Sheriff’s Office
Monterey-Salinas Transit
North County Fire Protection District
Monterey Off Road Cycling Association
Association of Monterey Bay
Area Governments

CONSULTANT TEAM
Lacy Brown
Bincy Koshy
Crystal Chavez
Elise Brockett
Sheida Carugati
Nikki Davis
Melissa Abadie
Kathryn Miller
Darryl DePencier
Julio Camacho
Abbey Ibarra
Frederik Venter

Table of Contents
ABOUT THE CITY OF MARINA 1 OUR COMMUNITY 2 THE IMPORTANCE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY IN MARINA 3 WHAT IS A SAFETY ACTION PLAN? 4 GUIDING PRINCIPLES 5 DEVELOPING THIS PLAN 8 WHERE AND WHY ARE TRAFFIC CRASHES HAPPENING? 11 CHALLENGE AREAS 13 PLAN OF ACTION 17 A CALL TO ACTION 26 List of Figures
List of Tables
TABLE 1. SAFE SYSTEM STRATEGIES FOR MARINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 TABLE 2. MARINA HOTSPOT SAFETY PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 TABLE 3. MARINA SYSTEMIC SAFETY PROJECTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 FIGURE 1. DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE CITY OF MARINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 FIGURE 2. REGIONAL AND AGENCY-SPECIFIC PLANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 FIGURE 3. USDOT SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 FIGURE 4. PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 FIGURE 5. POP-UP EVENT DISPLAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 FIGURE 6. ENGAGEMENT EVENTS FOR PLAN DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 FIGURE 7. SAFETY CONCERN AREAS WORD CLOUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 FIGURE 8. MARINA’S HIGH INJURY NETWORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 FIGURE 9. CHALLENGE AREAS FOR MARINA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Key Acronyms & Definitions
TAMC Transportation Agency for Monterey County
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
SS4A Safe Streets and Roads for All
USDOT United States Department of Transportation
VRU Vulnerable Road User
HIN High Injury Network
PDO Property Damage Only
Fatal Crash One or more participants died from injuries sustained, within 30 days of the crash event Serious Injury Crash A non-fatal crash where one or more participants sustained a severe injury preventing them from walking, driving, or performing activities they were capable of before the crash

vi
This plan is dedicated to the lives lost or forever
altered by traffic crashes on City of Marina
roadways We are committed to working towards
a future where everyone gets home safely every day
1 About the City of Marina
Marina is a coastal community along Monterey
Bay in the central coast of the state. Situated
along State Route 1, Marina lies approximately
8 miles northeast of Monterey and 8 miles
west of Salinas. Incorporated in 1975, it is the
newest city on the Monterey Peninsula.

The city is known for its extensive coastal
dunes and natural shoreline, including Marina
State Beach and Fort Ord Dunes State Park,
which provide opportunities for recreation
such as hiking, cycling, fishing, and hang
gliding. Today, Marina serves as a growing
residential and educational hub within
Monterey County, with a diverse community
and an economy supported by education,
tourism, research, and service industries.

2 0– 17 18–64 65+

POPULATION

AGE OF RESIDENTS

HOUSEHOLDS IN POVERTY

WORK COMMUTE TRANSPORTATION MODE TRANSPORTATION SPENDING

LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME RACIAL DEMOGRAPHICS JOBS
63%

ENGLISH
4%

TAGALOG/

FILIPINO
20%

SPANISH

INDIVIDUALS IDENTIFIES AS

HAVING A DISABILITY
7 in 50

PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
14% CARPOOL
12% WORK FROM HOME
7% WALK, BIKE, OR TAKE TRANSIT

0.6% USE OTHER TRAVEL OPTIONS
LIKE RIDESHARE, MOTORCYCLE, ETC.
67%

DRIVE A PERSONAL

VEHICLE ALONE
16%21% 64%

POPULATION

BY RACE

OF HOUSEHOLDS

LIVE BELOW THE
POVERTY LINE11%

JOBS BY

INDUSTRY
TYPE
25% 64%

MEDIAN-INCOME

HOUSEHOLDS

PERCENTAGE OF INCOME SPENT ON TRANSPORTATION

LOW-INCOME

HOUSEHOLDS
$$
22,600

TOTAL RESIDENTS IN
MARINA
ALMOST
38% WHITE
30% HISPANIC OR LATINO
13% ASIAN
11% OTHER
8% BLACK

0.2% AMERICAN

INDIAN/ALASKA NATIVE
28% OTHER
24% EDUCATION & HEALTHCARE
18% LEISURE & HOSPITALITY
14% CONSTRUCTION
10% PROFESSIONAL &

BUSINESS SERVICES
5% MANUFACTURING
2% AGRICULTURE,

FISHING, & MINING
FIGURE 1. DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE CITY OF MARINA Sources: 2020 U.S. Census and 2019-2023 American Community Survey data Our Community
3 The Importance of Traffic Safety in Marina
This plan focuses on traffic safety on
city-owned roadways in Marina
This plan studied city-owned and maintained
roads; state highways that are owned and
operated by Caltrans are not included in
this plan, but are discussed in the Monterey
County Regional Safety Action Plan.

The City of Marina experienced 289 crashes
from 2019 to 2023, 20 of those collisions
resulted in either a fatality or a serious injury.

Each of these 289 crashes, including those
that did not result in injury or death, had a
significant impact on those involved, their
family and friends, and our greater community.

These crashes happened all across the City,
and each one under a unique set of
circumstances, but commonalities from the
data emerged.

4 What is a Safety Action Plan?
A Safety Action Plan is a roadmap for
prioritizing and investing in the projects,
places, and efforts that are most likely to
reduce the risk of fatal and serious injury
crashes. This plan is part of a larger effort led
by the Transportation Agency of Monterey
County to develop regional and agency-
specific action plans. Development of these
plans is funded by a grant awarded by the
U.S. Department of Transportation through
the Safe Streets and Roads for All program.

The Monterey County Regional Safety Action
Plan provides a broad view of the safety
needs across the entire region, and outlines
high priority strategies for addressing
risky behaviors and reducing crash risks
countywide. Individual agency plans, like
this one, provide a more localized look at
the unique safety needs and projects that
are important within each community.

AGENCY-SPECIFIC SAFETY ACTION PLANS
Monterey
Salinas
Seaside

COMPLIMENTARY

SAFETY ACTION PLANS
Rural Monterey County Carmel-by-the-Sea
Del Rey Oaks Paciﬁc Grove
Sand City Marina
Gonzales Soledad
Greenﬁeld King City

MONTEREY COUNTY REGIONAL VISION ZERO SAFETY ACTION PLAN FIGURE 2. REGIONAL AND AGENCY-SPECIFIC PLANS
5 OUR SAFETY VISION AND GOAL
TAMC and the City of Marina believe
that everyone deserves to travel safely.

To achieve this vision, TAMC has set an
ambitious and achievable goal to reduce
fatal and serious injuries by 30% by 2030
with the ultimate goal of eliminating fatal
and serious injuries by 2040. This Monterey
County Regional Vision Zero target was
officially adopted by the TAMC Board of
Directors on March 25, 2026.

WHAT IS VISION ZERO?
Vision Zero is a global strategy to eliminate
traffic deaths and serious injuries in a certain
timeframe by treating them as preventable
events. In the U.S., the Vision Zero strategy
led to the adoption of the Federal Highway
Administration’s (FHWA) Safe System
Approach – a holistic roadway safety guide
that recognizes that humans make mistakes,
that our transportation network should be
designed to prevent fatal mistakes from
happening in the first place, and to minimize
the injury severity when a crash does occur.

WHAT IS A VISION ZERO SAFETY
ACTION PLAN AND WHY NOW?
Every year, approximately 40,000 people lose
their lives traveling on U.S. roadways. From
2019 to 2023 there were 289 total crashes
in the City of Marina. Of those crashes,
20 resulted in a serious or minor injury.

These are not merely statistics – these
are members of our community, our family,
friends, kids, neighbors, and colleagues.

The City of Marina is committed to reducing
and eventually eliminating the most severe
crashes in our city. This commitment takes
shape with effective strategies, policies,
programs, and projects that can be
implemented by the City and partner
agencies to reduce the risk of fatal and
serious injury crashes. This plan, in
coordination with the people and plans
developed for each agency in Monterey
County, will help us achieve our ambitious
regional Vision Zero goal together.

Zero is our goal
A safe system is how we get there
Guiding Principles
6 /bullet.case REDUNDANCY IS CRUCIAL /bullet.case DEATH /SERIO U S IN JU R Y IS U N A C C EPTABLE /bullet.case HUMANS M AKE M
ISTAKES /bullet.case
SAFETY IS PROACTIVE /bullet.case RESPO N S IB ILIT Y IS S H A R ED /bullet.case H U M ANS ARE VULNERABLE SAFE
SYSTEM

APPROACH
Post-Crash
Care
Safe
Speeds
Safe
Roads
Safe
Road Users
Safe
Vehicles
WHAT IS THE SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH?
The Safe System Approach is a framework
for effectively managing the diverse inherent
risks within the transportation system. As part
of this approach, multiple layers of protection
are created to prevent crashes and reduce
harm when crashes do occur. It is centered
on the idea that we all have a role to play in
creating a safer transportation system, and
achieving Vision Zero requires that we all do
our part to keep ourselves and others safe.

THERE ARE SIX KEY PRINCIPLES OF THE USDOT SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH:
1 Death and Serious Injuries are Unacceptable
2 Humans Make Mistakes
3 Humans are Vulnerable
4 Responsibility is Shared
5 Safety is Proactive
6 Redundancy is Crucial

FIGURE 3. USDOT SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH
7 Each of the six key principles in the Safe System Approach are supported by five main objectives:
1 Safer People Consider and address the safety of all road users, including those who walk, bike, drive, take transit, or travel by other modes.
2 Safer Roads Engineer roads to prioritize the safety of all road users, especially vulnerable road users, to minimize human mistakes, and to account for injury tolerance. 3 Safer Travel Options
(Safer Vehicles)
Expand the availability of safer travel options, including multimodal transportation networks, safe and reliable transit options, and advanced vehicle design and technologies. 4 Safer Speeds Promote safer speeds through context-appropriate roadway design, education, outreach, and enforcement.
5 Post-Crash Care
Enhance the survivability of a crash by making it easier and faster to receive emergency medical care and access trauma centers, create a safe working environment for emergency responders, and prevent secondary crashes.

While not yet an element of the USDOT Safe System wheel, the concept of Safer Land Use is gaining attention across the industry, and several states including California, Oregon, and Washington are considering adding it as a sixth element of the Safe System Approach. Land use decisions shape many aspects of the transportation system, including the ability for people to choose safer travel options and make fewer and shorter trips, reducing their exposure to crash risk.
8 SS4A REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF A
SAFETY ACTION PLAN:

Leadership commitment to a “Zero” goal
Involvement of a task force
Data-driven safety analysis
Robust public engagement
Assessment of policies, programs,
and processes
Prioritized projects that reflect
the Safe System Approach
Ongoing transparency and reporting

Developing this Plan
To help local agencies develop plans and implement roadway safety improvements that incorporate the Safe System Approach, a once-in-a-generation federal grant program known as Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) was developed to award demonstration and implementation funds to state and local agencies. The SS4A Grant Program is funded by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act starting in fiscal year 2022 and ends in fiscal year 2026. With SS4A funds, the TAMC has led the effort to develop regional, municipal, and rural county level action plans to help reduce and eventually eliminate fatal and serious injury crashes in Monterey County.

DATA-DRIVEN ANALYSIS
The cornerstone of this Plan is a data-driven
evaluation of safety needs and effective
solutions. We studied reported crash data, lived
experiences from community members, travel
patterns, and demographics to understand
where and why fatal and serious crashes are
happening. We then paired these findings with
national research, best practices, and local
knowledge to identify feasible, practical, locally
supported ways to save lives. More information
on the analysis and findings can be found in the
Where and Why Are Traffic Crashes Happening
and Plan of Action sections.

UNDERSTANDING
Data Analysis
Community
Demographics
Community
Engagement #1
Existing Plans,
Policies, and
Planned Projects

TASK FORCE

MEETING
NEEDS
High Injury
Network
Challenge Areas

SOLUTIONS
Safe System
Toolbox
High Priority
Projects,
Strategies,
and Policies
Community
Engagement #2

PLAN OF ACTION
Findings and
Implementation
Performance
Measures
Final Vision
Zero Safety
Action Plan

TASK FORCE

MEETING

LOCAL AGENCY

MEETINGS

TASK FORCE

MEETING
FIGURE 4. PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
9 ENGAGING WITH MARINA
The project team conducted two rounds of public outreach through workshops, pop-up events, and an online survey and comment map. The first round, held in Spring 2025, focused on understanding the challenges and opportunities related to transportation and safety in Marina.

Feedback from the community during this phase was incorporated into the planning process and helped shape potential solutions.

The second round, conducted in Fall 2025,
presented the recommended challenge areas
and solutions back to the community for
input. Community members could review
the recommendations, project ideas, and
share their feedback.

The City of Marina had a total of 49 comments
received through in-person comments, survey
responses, and the interactive comment map
throughout both phases of outreach. Figure 5
shows the board set up at the Phase 2 pop-up
event in Marina.

FIGURE 5. POP-UP EVENT DISPLAY
FIGURE 6. ENGAGEMENT EVENTS FOR PLAN DEVELOPMENT

PACIFIC OCEAN
Gonzales x2Gonzales x2
PrunedalePrunedaleCastrovilleCastroville
Toro ParkToro Park
Sand CitySand City
Del Rey OaksDel Rey Oaks
Paciﬁc Grove x2Paciﬁc Grove x2
Carmel-by-the-Sea x2Carmel-by-the-Sea x2
Greenﬁeld x3Greenﬁeld x3
Swiss Riﬂe ClubSwiss Riﬂe Club
Soledad x3Soledad x3
King City x3King City x3
Marina x2Marina x2
Monterey CountyMonterey County
101
101
198
68 1
146
183

OTHER ENGAGEMENT

EVENT LOCATIONS
MARINA

ENGAGEMENT EVENTS
10 Safety Concerns of Marina
Concerns were shared about unfamiliar drivers
in the area during tourism seasons, aggressive
driving, speeding, congestion, roadway
maintenance (especially pot holes and debris
from litter and road kill), and narrow lanes along
curves Figure 7 is a word cloud of the most
common words related to roadway safety that
community members in Marina said or wrote
down during the outreach process.

Community members expressed support for
safety improvements such as roundabouts and
improved maintenance and implementation of
pavement markings and striping.

During Phase 2 of the outreach, community
members voted on which challenge areas were
most important to making Marina streets safer.

The following challenge areas were identified
by community members in Marina as being a
priority to improve safety:
• Aggressive Driving
• Bicyclists
• Pedestrians
• Intersections
• Impaired Driving
• Distracted Driving

TAMC VISION ZERO TASK FORCE
The Monterey County Vision Zero Task Force
was made up of safety partners across the
community, including representatives from
schools, medical and emergency response
professionals, community organizations, public
works, law enforcement, and fire departments.

Three task force groups were created to
capture the diverse area and interests in
Monterey County – the South County,
Peninsula, and Regional task forces. Task
Force membership included a mix of urban,
rural, and regional interests as participants
shared their input and experiences not just
where they work, but also where they live and
travel. This Plan incorporates safety concerns,
feedback, and suggestions for the City of
Marina that were gathered from the Peninsula
and Regional Task Force groups.

FIGURE 7. SAFETY CONCERN AREAS WORD CLOUD
11 Where and Why are Traffic Crashes Happening?
To understand traffic safety risks and needs, we studied reported crash data for the most recent five years of available data, spanning January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2023. Crashes with no reported injuries, also referred to as property damage only crashes, were not included in the analysis.

CRASH TYPES
Understanding the most common types of
collisions that resulted in fatalities and serious
injuries on rural roadways can help tailor safety
improvements to address those patterns.

CRASHES INVOLVING

VULNERABLE ROAD USERS
Vulnerable road users (VRUs) include both
pedestrians and bicyclists.

Over five years, 289 crashes resulting in an injury
were reported on Marina streets, including
2 fatalities and 18 serious injuries
Rear-ends
Broadside (right-angle)
Of all crashes in Marina involve
a VRU
Of all fatal and serious injury
crashes involve a VRU
Involved a pedestrian, resulting in 1
fatality and 2 serious injuries
Involved a bicyclist, resulting in 2
serious injuries
Unsafe speeds
Failed to yield right of way
Improper turning by the vehicle
Driving or riding a bicycle under
the influence
40%
14%
25%

CRASHES

CRASHES
22 19
34%
10%
11%
11%
23%
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 0

FATAL INJURY SUSPECTED

SERIOUS INJURY
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
3 2 2
3 6
4 *Contributing factors often overlap and are not mutually exclusive.

PRIMARY CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
Across the US, over 90% of crashes are
the result of human error
There is rarely a single cause of a crash, but
rather a combination of factors related to the
driver, vehicle, environment, or other road
users. The following summarizes trends in
the primary factor reported in crashes of all
severities on City of Marina roads.*
12 HIGH INJURY NETWORK
The High Injury Network, or HIN, identifies the
roadways that have experienced the highest
number and severity of crashes. The HIN helps
focus the safety priorities and investments in
the areas with the highest need. A map of the
HIN is shown in Figure 8.

RESERVATION RDRESERVATION RD
MarinaMarina
1PACIFIC OCEAN

IM JIN PKW Y

DEL MONTE BLVD

HIGH INJURY

NETWORK
FIGURE 8. MARINA’S HIGH INJURY NETWORK
80%

OF HIGH SEVERITY CRASHES

OCCURRED ON ONLY
12%

OF THE ROAD MILES IN
MARINA
13 Challenge Areas
Challenge areas are not locations. They
represent the underlying crash patterns that
are most contributing to fatal and serious injury
crashes. In an environment of limited funding,
we must focus our resources on the efforts
that will make the biggest difference, and
emphasis areas help us do that. Challenge
areas provide a strategic framework for
developing and implementing safety
strategies, prioritizing capital projects,
guiding enforcement and education.

We applied a data-driven approach to selecting
challenge areas. We started with the list of
16 Challenge Areas outlined in the California
Strategic Highway Safety Plan, and used local
crash patterns and community input to select
the subset that best reflect local needs.

The City of Marina challenge areas are
focused on those that reflect the unique needs
of the City, while the Monterey County Region
plan captures those that are more broadly
applicable across the entire region.

FIGURE 9. CHALLENGE AREAS FOR MARINA
MARINA

CRASH TRENDS

TASK FORCE
LOCAL
AGENCY
INPUT

REGIONAL

CRASH TRENDS

COMMUNITY

FEEDBACK
Bicyclists
Pedestrians
Lane Departures
Intersections
Impaired Driving
Speed Management/
Aggressive Driving
Aging Drivers
Young Drivers
Distracted Driving
Motorcyclists
Workzones
Commercial Vehicles
Occupant Protection
Driver Licensing
Emergency Response
Emerging Technologies

CITY OF MARINA

CHALLENGE AREAS

MONTEREY COUNTY REGIONAL

CHALLENGE AREAS
Impaired Driving
Speed Management/
Aggressive Driving
Distracted Driving
Pedestrians and Bicyclists
Young Drivers
Aging Drivers
Occupant Protection
Pedestrians
Bicyclists
Distracted Driving
Impaired Driving
Aging Drivers
Young Drivers
Lane Departure

CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE CHALLENGE AREAS
14 PEDESTRIANS
35%

OF FATAL AND SERIOUS

INJURY CRASHES

IN MARINA (HIGHER THAN

STATEWIDE AVERAGE)
Pedestrians are some of the most vulnerable
users of a roadway network, and many
younger and older people travel on foot,
which compounds this vulnerability. Even if
their primary mode of travel is by car, everyone
is a pedestrian at some point during their trip,
whether to get to a bus stop, a parking spot,
or even the mailbox. Crashes involving
pedestrians can occur at intersections, at
mid-block locations, or along streets where
there is not a safe place to walk. Because
pedestrians aren’t protected by a vehicle,
even low-speed crashes can cause serious
injury or death.

BICYCLISTS
14%

OF FATAL AND SERIOUS

INJURY CRASHES

IN MARINA (HIGHER THAN

STATEWIDE AVERAGE)
A bicycle-involved crash involves instances
where a motor vehicle is involved in a crash
with a bicyclist, including e-bikes and their
riders. Bicyclists are also considered
vulnerable road users along with pedestrians
Even when most trips are made by car, people
still become vulnerable road users at some
point, whether biking to school, walking to a
bus stop, heading to a parking space, or simply
checking the mailbox. Many crashes involving
vulnerable users occur at intersections or on
roads that lack safe walking or biking space;
even low-speed collisions can result in severe
injuries or fatalities.

15 DISTRACTED DRIVING
14%

OF FATAL AND SERIOUS

INJURY CRASHES

IN MARINA (HIGHER THAN

STATEWIDE AVERAGE)

IMPAIRED DRIVING
28%

OF FATAL AND SERIOUS

INJURY CRASHES

IN MARINA (HIGHER THAN

STATEWIDE AVERAGE)
Impaired driving crashes include all reported
crashes where any evidence of alcohol or drug
use (both illegal and prescription) is present,
even if the driver was not over the legal limit.

Impairment slows reaction time, affects
judgment, and makes it harder to stay in a lane,
follow signals, or respond to hazards. Drivers
who are impaired tend to make other risky
choices, like speeding or not using a seatbelt,
increasing the likelihood of severe injuries
or fatalities.

Distracted driving is one of the most
preventable threats to roadway safety. It occurs
whenever a driver diverts attention from the
primary task of driving—whether to read or send
a text message, adjust in-vehicle technology,
eat, interact with passengers, or focus on
something outside the vehicle. Distractions
generally fall into three categories: visual (taking
eyes off the road), manual (taking hands off the
wheel), and cognitive (taking the mind off
driving). Distracted driving is also one of the
most underreported contributing factors to
crashes, as it is difficult to confirm without a
witness or confession.

When a driver is distracted, reaction time slows,
situational awareness diminishes, and the
ability to detect and respond to hazards is
compromised. In just a brief moment of
inattention, rear-end collisions, lane departures,
or missed traffic signals can occur. These
incidents can lead to crashes with severe
outcomes, particularly for vulnerable road
users such as people walking and bicycling.

16 AGING DRIVERS
21%

OF FATAL AND SERIOUS

INJURY CRASHES

IN MARINA (HIGHER THAN

STATEWIDE AVERAGE)
Older drivers (age 65+) require a different
approach, one that balances support for
continued mobility while addressing age-related
changes that can affect driving performance
and injury tolerances. Older drivers tend to be
safer and experienced, however changes in
vision, reaction time and cognitive processing
can make complex driving environments more
challenging to navigate. Besides driving
performance, injury outcomes tend to be more
severe for aging adults when a crash does
occur. Designing our roadways to account for
these limitations, as well as increasing programs
and policies that support education, training,
and travel choices for aging adults can reduce
the risk of crashes.

YOUNG DRIVERS
7%

OF FATAL AND SERIOUS

INJURY CRASHES

IN MARINA (HIGHER THAN

STATEWIDE AVERAGE)
Y oung drivers (are 15-24) are still developing
critical decision making skills and often have
limited behind the wheel experience, which
can increase the risk of crashes, particularly
those involving speed, distraction or peer
influence. Comprehensive driver education
can play a key role. High-quality programs that
emphasize hazard recognition, defensive
driving techniques, and the consequences of
risky behaviors—such as distracted or impaired
driving—help establish safe habits early.

LANE DEPARTURE
28%

OF FATAL AND SERIOUS

INJURY CRASHES

IN MARINA (HIGHER THAN

STATEWIDE AVERAGE)
Lane and road departure crashes happen
when a driver drifts out of their lane or leaves
the roadway entirely, often due to impairment,
distraction, speeding, fatigue, or losing control.

Lane departure crashes often result in
sideswipe or head-on collisions when a vehicle
crosses into another lane, while road
departure crashes are typically single-vehicle
crashes that result in the vehicle hitting fixed
objects, rolling over, or landing in a ditch.

17 Plan of Action
Achieving Vision Zero by eliminating traffic
deaths and severe injuries will take real action—
doing nothing is not an option. However, we
also must recognize that the City of Marina has
limited resources, and we must focus on the
efforts with the biggest safety benefits,
measure progress, and make informed
decisions to improve safety for everyone.

The recommendations in this Plan are meant
to guide future work, not lock the City into a
fixed set of actions. They provide a starting
point for funding requests and project
design, and they will be updated over time
as conditions change, new funding becomes
available, projects are completed, and more
community input is received. In that way, this
Safety Action Plan is not just a summary of
current conditions—it’s a practical tool to help
the City of Marina make steady progress
toward safer roads.

The following sections summarize the
recommended efforts and projects that are
most likely to save lives in Marina, as well as a
guide for implementing those projects and
monitoring progress.

EXISTING EFFORTS
Providing a safe transportation system has been
a guiding principle for Marina for many years. In
2022, the City adopted a Local Road Safety
Plan, which allowed the City to pursue grant
funding for safety projects and also set
a strong foundation for this safety action plan.

The City also has an Active Transportation Plan
and a Safe Routes to School Plan, which focus
on improving safety and mobility for those who
walk and bike around the City. Many other
City plans, programs, and efforts highlight the
importance of transportation safety in Marina,
including the 2045 General Plan Update,
which includes specific goals related to
roadway safety and mobility.
• PAR-10(E): Ensure that any new beach
parking areas located on the east side of
Hwy 1 are connected to coastal access
points via alternative modes of
transportation such as MST bus routes,
shuttles and bicycle/pedestrian trails.
• LUD-5: The City shall encourage mulit-
modal streets that are ADA accessible,
transit supportive and integrate safe
bicycle lanes and other modes of
transportation facilitate coastal access
for everyone.
• EJ-7: The City shall prioritize
improvements to walking and biking
infrastructure to ensure safe, accessible,
and convenient routes to coastal access
points including parks and the beach.

These improvements may include, but
are not limited to, the creation of bike
lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, and traffic
calming measures, with the goal of
promoting sustainable transportation and
equitable access for all residents.
• EJ-8: The City will support Monterey
Salinas Transit’s expansion of public
transit service in the form of flat rates
and increased headway frequency to the
City’s coast.

The City continues to work toward these goals
through construction of road improvements,
regular maintenance activities, studying and
planning for future needs, and pursuing grant
funding for future projects. In particular, the
City is developing a project along Del Monte
Blvd that includes median installation in Phase
1 and a set of roundabouts in Phase 2.
18 PRIORITIZING INVESTMENTS
Recognizing the reality of the City’s limited resources and inability to complete all recommended projects, investments should be prioritized, based on the following data-driven criteria to maximize the potential safety benefits (listed in order of importance). 1 High Injury Network Focus
Highest priority should be given to projects located on or directly addressing corridors and intersections identified on the High Injury Network. These locations represent a disproportionate share of fatal and serious injury crashes and offer the greatest opportunity for measurable safety benefits. 2 Systemic Safety Opportunity
Projects that can be implemented systemically to benefit a large proportion of the community, such as speed management, signing and striping upgrades, and low-cost intersection enhancements, should be prioritized to proactively reduce risk before crashes occur. 3 Proximity to Schools
and Youth Activity Areas
Projects near K–12 schools, childcare facilities, parks, and other youth-oriented destinations should be prioritized, particularly those that improve walking and bicycling safety. This includes improvements aligned with Safe Routes to School programs and corridors with documented student travel demand. 4 Vulnerable Road Users
Priority should be given to projects that improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, older adults, people with disabilities, and transit users. Locations with a history of pedestrian- or bicycle-involved crashes, or where vulnerable users are exposed to high-speed or high-volume traffic, should rank highly. 5 Disadvantaged
Community Considerations
Projects serving communities disproportionately impacted by traffic injuries, areas of persistent poverty, or communities with limited access to safe transportation options should be elevated. 6 Feasibility and Readiness Project readiness, cost-effectiveness, ease of implementation, and compatibility with planned roadway or capital projects should be considered to maximize near-term safety benefits. 19 SAFE SYSTEM STRATEGIES
When we think of ways to improve safety, many people think only of engineering projects. However, through the Safe System Approach, we know that achieving Vision Zero will require a variety of efforts and investments that are much more broad than a list of capital projects.

THE STRATEGIES ARE INTENDED TO COMPLIMENT AND SUPPORT ENGINEERING PROJECTS IN THREE KEY WAYS:
1 Elevate the importance of traffic safety
within our agency
2 Make it easier to fund or build
safety improvements
3 Encourage safe behaviors and foster a stronger
culture of traffic safety in our community

20 TABLE 1. SAFE SYSTEM STRATEGIES FOR MARINA

STRATEGIES TIER CATEGORY

CHALLENGE AREAS
LANE

DEPARTURES

IMPAIRED

DRIVING

DISTRACTED

DRIVING
AGING

DRIVERS
YOUNG

DRIVERS BICYCLISTS PEDESTRIANS
Conduct an educational campaign
to increase awareness and proper
use of roundabouts
Tier 2
Engagement,
Education,
Enforcement
Establish a Safer Speeds
program/policy for establishing
posted speed limits consistent
with national best practices for
context-based speed limit setting
Tier 3
Policies/
programs for
Countermeasure
Implementation
Advocate for legislation to permit
automated enforcement for
speeding and red light running
Tier 3
Engagement,
Education,
Enforcement

DOES NOT APPL YINTENDED PURPOSE INDIRECT BENEFITSECONDARY PURPOSE/DIRECT BENEFIT Table 1 lists the recommended strategies that will help the City of Marina better prioritize safety and move projects forward. 21 PROJECTS
Across the High Injury Network, there are a variety of safety needs that can be addressed through a combination of systemic (proactive) and hotspot (reactive) projects.

Systemic projects aim to treat one or more
underlying risk factors by installing a low-cost
treatment at several similar locations. An
example of a systemic project would be
upgrading warning signs at multiple
stop-controlled intersections that have
limited sight distance.

Hotspot projects, on the other hand, tend to
include higher cost solutions that improve safety
at a single location where there is a high risk for
crashes and/or where there has been a history
of severe crashes. An example of a hotspot
project would be installing a roundabout at
a stop-controlled intersection with a history
of multiple fatal and severe injury crashes.

The following project tables list the hotspot
and systemic solutions that address the
primary crash patterns associated with fatal
and serious injury crashes on Marina roads,
with a focus on roadways that are on the
High Injury Network.

TABLE 2. MARINA HOTSPOT SAFETY PROJECT

PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION TIMELINE
Del Monte Blvd / Palm Ave
Improve intersection visibility with retroreflective backplates and high visibility pavement markings and signs. Add overhead lane assignment signs and add cat-tracks through intersection. Add leading pedestrian interval (LPI) and yield lines ahead of crosswalks (particularly on west leg/trail crossing). If delays or queues are uneven, adjust signal timing to balance flows prior to roundabout installation.

Near-term
Reservation Road / De
Forest Road
Recommended improvements include adding marked crosswalks on all legs to improve pedestrian visibility and implementing a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) to reduce conflicts with turning vehicles. Advance stop bars, such as bicycle boxes, will aid in improving bicyclist positioning, and better intersection lighting to enhance nighttime safety.

Raised medians or refuge islands on Reservation Road will provide safer pedestrian crossings. Upgrades to signal hardware, including improved lenses and backplates with retroreflective borders, will increase signal visibility and driver awareness.

Near-term
Del Monte Blvd / Palm Ave
Installing a roundabout would improve intersection safety and operations by reducing conflict points and lowering vehicle speeds. This design helps decrease the likelihood and severity of crashes, particularly angle and head-on collisions, while also improving traffic flow by minimizing delays and eliminating the need for signal control.

Long-term
Del Monte Boulevard /
Beach Road
Recommended roundabout improvements include installing delineators, reflectors, or object markers to better define the roadway and improve visibility. Add dynamic or variable speed warning signs to help reduce approach speeds. A road diet, reducing travel lanes from four to three while adding a center turn lane and bike lanes, to calm traffic and improve multimodal safety. Installing a fence in the median on the northbound approach will aid in managing sight lines and reduce potential conflicts.

Near-term
22 In addition to location-specific strategies, the Plan identifies opportunities for systemic, citywide safety improvements on Marina roadways, particularly along corridors that are part of the City’s HIN. Systemic treatments applied consistently across similar roadway types can proactively reduce crash risk, even in locations with few reported crashes.

TABLE 3. MARINA SYSTEMIC SAFETY PROJECTS

SYSTEMIC TREATMENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION TIMELINE
Systemic Traffic Signal
Improvements
Systemic signal upgrades — retroreflective backplates, overhead lane assignment signs, and Leading Pedestrian Intervals along Del Monte Boulevard. Review and update pedestrian walk times at signalized intersections. Near-term Speed Management
Implement speed feedback signs in school zones and High Injury Network corridors (Reservation Rd, Del Monte Blvd, Hwy 1, Imjin Pkwy) that collect data. This information can help the Police Department identify when speeding is most frequent and support more targeted enforcement.

Near-term
Reservation Road
Corridor Improvements
Corridor-wide improvements include enhancing signal hardware, such as lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number, to improve visibility, along with optimizing signal timing (coordination, phases, and intervals) to improve traffic flow. Safety can be further increased by providing Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection for high-speed approaches and installing emergency vehicle pre-emption systems to support faster response times. Additional measures include installing raised pavement markers and striping throughout intersections to improve guidance, modifying signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) to reduce pedestrian conflicts, adding dynamic or variable speed warning signs to manage speeds, and installing raised medians (refuge islands) to enhance pedestrian safety.

Near-term
Imjin Parkway/2nd Ave,
California Ave, All roadway
segments of Imjin Road to
2nd Ave
Corridor-wide improvements include improving signal hardware, such as lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number, to enhance visibility, along with optimizing signal timing (coordination, phases, and intervals) to improve traffic flow. Providing Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection will increase safety on high-speed approaches, while installing emergency vehicle pre-emption systems will support faster response times. Additional measures, including raised pavement markers and striping throughout intersections and dynamic or variable speed warning signs, will further improve driver awareness and overall roadway safety.

Near-term
Systemic Traffic Signal
Improvements
This systemwide strategy includes implementing systemic signal upgrades, such as retroreflective backplates, overhead lane assignment signs, and Leading Pedestrian Intervals (LPIs) along Del Monte Boulevard, to improve visibility, guidance, and pedestrian safety. In addition, reviewing and updating pedestrian walk times at signalized intersections would help ensure adequate crossing time and enhance accessibility for all users.

Near-term
Speed Management Plan
Implementing speed feedback signs in school zones and along High Injury Network corridors, including Reservation Road, Del Monte Boulevard, Highway 1, and Imjin Parkway, will help raise driver awareness and reduce speeding. By collecting data on vehicle speeds and patterns, these systems can also provide valuable information to the Police Department, allowing for more targeted and effective enforcement during peak speeding times.

Near-term
23 RESOURCES AND TOOLS
Our understanding of safety strategies,
their effectiveness, and best practices for
implementation are continually evolving.

The following state and federal resources
may be useful when identifying safety
strategies for a specific location, underlying
risk, or crash pattern:
• FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures
• FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures
in Rural Communities
• NHTSA Countermeasures that Work
• USDOT National Roadway Safety Strategy
• Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual
• Safe System Roadway Design Hierarchy
We recognize that much of this plan is based
on a snapshot of reported crashes, and that
new high-crash locations and crash patterns
may emerge in the coming years. The
Monterey County Regional Safety Action Plan
includes several tools and resources that
can be used to diagnose safety risks and
find effective solutions.

Safe System Toolbox: A comprehensive
list of safety countermeasures, expected
safety benefits, and considerations for
implementation.

Case Studies: 24 example case studies
of locations throughout Monterey
County that highlight common crash
trends, site characteristics, and
potential countermeasures.

24 FUNDING SOURCES
Implementing this Plan will require assembling
funding from multiple levels – federal, state,
regional, and local, based on project type
(capital vs. programmatic), sponsor eligibility
(TAMC vs. local jurisdictions), and readiness
(quick-build vs. construction). The 2026 TAMC
Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(RTIP) confirms that Monterey County projects
already draw from a broad mix of sources,
including federal formula programs state
programs, and local funds.

Federal Funding Sources
Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) – USDOT
SS4A is the primary federal funding source
for Vision Zero and Safe System efforts. It
provides about $1B/year (2022–2026) for
local agencies to complete safety planning
and deliver safety projects. Grant types
include Planning (about $100K–$1M) and
Implementation (about $1M–$20M, requires
an adopted safety action plan). A 20% local
match is required and may include in-kind
contributions. SS4A is well suited for systemic
safety improvements, Safe Routes to School,
and education/enforcement programs.

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
HSIP funds infrastructure projects with proven
crash reduction benefits, including signals,
striping/signing, crosswalks, beacons, rumble
strips, guardrails, and other countermeasures.

Projects using a systemic approach, targeting
the High Injury Network, and aligning with
Vision Zero priorities are typically most
competitive. Cycles occur about every
1–2 years (next anticipated in 2026).

INFRA Competitive Grants – FHWA
INFRA supports large, corridor-scale projects
with strong regional or national benefits.

Projects combining safety with freight, transit,
and multimodal access may be competitive.

IIJA / Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL)
The IIJA expanded federal transportation
funding, including SS4A and major competitive
programs such as BUILD, which can support
safety, multimodal access, and state-of-good-
repair improvements.

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Set-Aside – FHWA
TA supports smaller-scale pedestrian and
bicycle projects, including Safe Routes to
School, trails, sidewalks, bikeways, crossings,
and traffic calming—especially near schools
and in high pedestrian activity areas.

State of California Funding Sources
Active Transportation Program (ATP)
ATP is California’s primary competitive
program for walking and biking projects
and related planning and safety programs,
including Safe Routes to School and
education/enforcement efforts.

SB 1 (Road Repair and Accountability Act)
SB 1 provides ongoing state funding for
roadway rehabilitation and safety upgrades.

Key categories include local streets/roads
maintenance, bicycle and pedestrian
improvements (often through ATP), and
planning grants.

State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
STIP funds major multi-year capital projects
on state and local networks. Projects with
clear safety benefits and regional mobility/
connectivity value may be good candidates.

California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grants
OTS provides annual grants for non-
infrastructure safety strategies such as
education, enforcement, emergency response
support, and safety campaigns, based
on documented crash and safety needs.
25 Programming + Local Funding
RTIP/TIP Programming
The Safety Action Plan should serve as a
project pipeline, helping move projects into
RTIP/TIP programming for construction using
sources such as HSIP, ATP, STIP, and SB 1.

Local Revenues + Development Fees
Local funds are critical for grant match, quick-
build pilots, and near-term improvements.

Development impact fees and mitigation
funding can also support safety upgrades
in growth areas and high-need corridors.

MONITORING PERFORMANCE
A core element of Vision Zero is the
commitment to accountability and
transparency, ensuring that the City of Marina’s
progress toward eliminating fatal and serious
injury crashes can be measured, monitored,
and communicated clearly to the public.

Performance measures provide the framework
for tracking that progress over time and
evaluating whether the strategies and
investments outlined in this Plan are producing
meaningful results.

As strategies and projects are implemented,
it is vital to regularly monitor citywide safety
performance to determine the effectiveness
of those efforts, and make adjustments to
future investments and priorities, as needed.

Moving forward, the City of Marina will use
the following performance measures to track
the successful implementation of this plan.

Number of fatal and serious injury crashes
on City roadways (total)
Number of fatal and serious injury crashes
by challenge area:
• At intersections
• Involving pedestrians
These performance measures can be tracked
in coordination with TAMC’s planned safety
performance report, which will be prepared
and shared annually. TAMC is in the process of
establishing a regional crash database that will
allow for more timely, accurate, and accessible
local crash data, and will also allow for
improved regional data sharing capabilities.
26 A Call to Action
We all have a shared responsibility to keep ourselves and others safe when we travel Infrastructure matters, but so do the choices we make every day Whether you are behind the wheel, on a bike, or walking, each of us plays a role by slowing down, staying alert, and respecting the rules of the road Together, we can build a culture where getting home safely is the expectation, every time, for everyone
June 11, 2026 Item No. 13c

Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 16, 2026

CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDE R ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2026 -, APPROVING THE AUTHORIZATION OF 1) SUBMITTAL OF AN
APPLICATION FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW SIGNAGE AND 2)

REBRANDING FROM SHELL OIL TO GULF OIL AT THE EXISTING
CITY-OWNED SITE LOCATED AT 2700 IMJIN PARKWAY ; AND FIND

THAT THIS ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO
SECTION 15061(B(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES.

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. 2026 -, approving the authorization of 1) Submittal of an application for installation of new signage at the subject site; and 2) Rebranding from Shell Oil to Gulf Oil.

PROJECT HISTORY

Subject Site
2700 Imjin Parkway (Assessor’s Parcel Number APN 031 -101-039-000) is situated on City - owned land located adjacent to, and south of, the intersection of Imjin Parkway and Abrams Drive, outside t he limits of the City of Marina and within the jurisdiction of Monterey County.

Currently, tenant AJ Petroleum , a private entity, leases the property, including both Fort Ord Market and associated on-site fueling (gasoline) station, from the City of Marina. The existing tenant intends to rebrand the existing site from Shell Oil to Gulf Oil.

Background
In early 2026, project proponent Maria Valenzuela of AA Signs, Inc. initiated submittal of a n application for new signage at the extraterritorial City -owned lot leased by Shell Oil/Gulf Oil .

On February 5, 2026, City staff receive d correspondence from staff of the County of Monterey , inquiring about the agency responsible for review and approval of proposed installation of new signage at the subject site. On March 6, 2026, City staff subsequently received correspondence from Ms. Valenzuela, expressing concern regarding perceptions of delay and discrepancy in information provided about processing of the sign permit application pursued.

On March 13, 2026, City staff forwarded to the project applicant a memorandum providing information regarding permit application submittal procedures and requirements. On March 20, 2026, staff received feedback from County Planning staff relaying that the proposed height and size of signage would appear not to conform to regulations of the County of Monterey and thus could not be approved by the County. Since that time, City staff have provided ongoing guidance to the sign permit applicant regarding the nature and timing of permit processing intended to facilitate expeditious review.

1 Jurisdictional Authority and Interagency Coordination Although the City of Marina owns the property, because it is located within Monterey County boundaries and not the City of Marina boundaries, the application requires review by the County of Monterey as responsible jurisdiction. City staff has coordinated closely with County staff regarding revisions to proposed signage design necessary for compliance with applicable standards to foster timely application processing and approval.

City Council Review
Submittal of a permit application on City -owned property requires that the City consent, in writing, its authorization for submittal of such application. Additionally, the existing lease agreement authorizing the current business’ tenancy of the subject site states definitively that approval by the City must be provided for placement of any new signage on the property.

Although Section 20.6 of the Lease authorizes the City Manager to give such consent on behalf of the Lessor, out of an abundance of caution and in the interest of transparency, staff has brought the matter to the City Council for review, and approval of, proposed signage design and application submittal, in addition to rebranding of the subject site from Shell Oil to Gulf Oil.

The information contained herein is presented in order to apprise the City Council of proposed changes and to provide the opportunity for consideration and feedback regarding any desired modification.

ANALYSIS
Initial Proposal
As originally proposed, the project scope of work encompassed installation of a new pylon sign of 20 feet in height and 120 square feet in sign area, new signage proposed to be affixed to the existing all-weather canopy, along with placement of new building wall signage. An excerpt of plans submitted, including the pylon sign originally proposed, appears below:
2 In response to the plans provided, s taff relayed to the permit applicant that signage as proposed would require review and approval by the City in conjunction with proposed rebranding . City staff additionally expressed concern regarding the proposed size and height of the signage and informed the sign permit applicant that, based on correspondence with County of Monterey staff, the submitted scope of work would likely not conform to County regulations. Correspondence from County staff presented the following:

In regard to the recent application to replace existing signage at the Imjin Road gas station and convenience store, Building Permit No. 26CP00056, it is County staff’s position that the proposal is inconsistent with the County’s sign regulations. According to the County’s Regulations for Signs: “Where signs are allowable under the regulations of the zoning districts identified in Sections 21.60.070 and 21.60.080, the total area of such signs shall not exceed thirty-five (35) square feet in the aggregate. This limitation in total area shall apply even though the use has frontage on two or more streets.” In the proposal under Building Permit No. 26CP00056, there are three businesses shown on the subject parcel. At this time, the signage exceeds the allowable 35 square feet aggregate per business and will need to be reduced in order to comply with this section.

Additionally, the free -standing sign that is sited for replacement exceeds the allowable height for free standing signs. Within the County’s regulations for signs, it is indicated the height of the sign may not exceed six feet if freestanding, or if attached to a structure, the sign may not be higher than the roof line or parapet of the wall. Currently, Building Permit Plans No. 26CP00056 indicates a proposed replacement sign with a height of 20 feet as measured from average natural grade.

At this time, County staff cannot support the replacement signage project as proposed unless such modifications are made to the plans.

Revised Proposal

Following outreach from City staff, the sign permit applicant revised the proposed signage design, then presenting two potential designs, as follows:

Option 1
3 Option 2

Preliminary Approval by County

Coordination with County staff has determined that the proposed scope of work included in Option 1 would conform to applicable County regulations, and County staff have preliminarily approved the applicant’s most recent Planning permit application, pending authorization by the City.

Proposed Rebranding

In conjunction with new signage proposed , the City Attorney has confirmed that the lease in place mandates that tenant AJ Petroleum obtain permission from the City to rebrand the existing fueling station from Shell Oil to Gulf Oil. As set forth above, the lease authorizes the City Manager to consent to the signage and rebranding proposed. However, in the interest of transparency and the interest in the property at issue, staff has brought this matter for City Council for review and decision. Staff recommend that the City Council authorize such approval.

ENVIROMENTAL REVIEW
None of the following, including 1) authorization of application for submittal of new signage at an extraterritorial City -owned site, 2) approval of rebranding of an existing store, or 3) consideration of revocation of lease held by an existing tenant at a City -owned property constitutes a project subject to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the commonsense exemption found in section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

CONCLUSION
City staff recommend that the City Council grant authorization for submittal of the application for new signage to the County of Monterey and approve rebranding of the existing fueling station from Shell Oil to Gulf Oil, fostering enhancement in utility and aesthetics of the City - owned site.

Respectfully submitted

_____________________
Guido F. Persicone, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Marina
4 REVIEWED BY:

_______________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

5 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA
AUTHORIZING 1) SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW SIGNAGE, 2) REBRANDING FROM SHELL OIL TO GULF OIL, AND 3) REVOCATION OF THE CURRENT TENANT’S LEASE AT THE EXISTING CITY - OWNED SITE AT 2700 IMJIN PARKWAY AND FIND UING THAT THIS ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(B(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES.

WHEREAS, on June 2, 2026, applicant Maria Valenzuela of AA Signs, Inc. submitted to the County of Monterey an application for proposed installation of new signage at the extraterritorial City-owned lot leased by Shell Oil/Gulf Oil located at 2700 Imjin Parkway; and

WHEREAS, the subject application requires review by the County of Monterey as responsible jurisdictional authority for review of said sign permit application; and

WHEREAS, the proposed signage design as submitted, based on feedback from County of Monterey staff, conforms to relevant regulations of the County of Monterey allowing for application approval; and

WHEREAS, in conjunction with new signage proposed , the City Attorney has confirmed that the existing lease in force requires that AJ Petroleum, tenant of the subject City-owned site, must obtain permission from the City to rebrand the existing fueling station from Shell Oil to Gulf Oil.

NOW THEREFORE BE IS RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:

1. Authorize submittal of an application to the County of Monterey for installation of new signage at the subject site; and

2. Approve rebranding of the subject site from Shell Oil to Gulf Oil , subject to meeting the County of Monterey’s applicable requirements.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 16th day of June 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
6 June 11, 2026 Item No. 13d
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of June 16, 2026

RECOMMENDATION TO CONDUCT FIRST READING AND INTRODUCE FOR ADOPTION ORDINANCE NO. 2026 -, ADDING CHAPTER 1.16 (CUSTODY AND USE OF CITY SEAL, CITY LOGO, AND CITY INSIGNIA) TO TITLE 1 (GENERAL

PROVISIONS) OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 2026-, adding Chapter 1.16 (Custody and Use of City Seal, City Logo, and City Insignia) to Title 1 (General Provisions) of the Marina Municipal Code; waive further reading; and introduce the ordinance.

BACKGROUND:

The City Logo and Official City Seal communicate the authority and authenticity of City actions, and their unauthorized or misleading use can confuse residents, harm the City ’s reputation, and expose the City to risk.

The City has taken multiple steps over the past two decades to develop and protect its identity:
a. In 1997, the City Council considered registration of the City logo (the predecessor 1975 badge) as a trade name with the California Secretary of State. The Secretary of State declined to register the design on the ground that the City lacked qualifying goo ds or services. The Council subsequently adopted a Permit Application process requiring Council approval for third-party use.
b. Between 2003 and 2008, the Council approved discrete third-party uses by resolution, including the Marina Rotary Club (Res. No. 2003 -132), Royer Printing/Piper Jaffray (Res. No. 2005 -205), Monterey Peninsula College (Res. No. 2006 -143), Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce (Res. No. 2006 -180), and the U.S. Army Garrison Command, Presidio of Monterey (Res. No. 2008-84).
c. On January 8, 2008, the Council approved the design concept for the current City Logo and Official City Seal (Res. No. 2008-09); on October 7, 2008, the Council adopted the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines (Res. No. 2008-205). d. On November 17, 2009, the City registered the current City Logo and Official City Seal with the United States Copyright Office (Reg. Nos. VA 1-692-471 and VA 1-692- 474, respectively).

Despite these steps, the City does not currently have a codified ordinance setting forth uniform rules for the custody, use, and protection of its insignia, standards governing third-party use, or the enforcement consequences of unauthorized use. The standards applied by the Council in third-party approvals have developed by practice across individual resolutions rather than through codified law, and the existing Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines, while comprehensive on design standards, do not address enforcement. 1 A recent third-party request submitted by Mr. Kris Cameron on behalf of the Fogtown Family Car Club illustrated several gaps in the existing framework. The applicant proposed to incorporate the City’s prior 1975 logo into a Club logo for federal trademark registration. In considering Staff’s recommendation on that request, City Attorney and Staff identified the benefit of codifying a uniform framework that would (i) clarify the standards Council applies in evaluating third -party requests; (ii) expressly address trademark registration concerns; (iii) provide explicit enforcement authority for unauthorized use; and (iv) align Marina’s practice with that of other California cities.

ANALYSIS:

Existing State Law and the Need for a Local Ordinance.

California Government Code section 34501.5 makes it a misdemeanor to use a reproduction or facsimile of a city ’s seal in campaign literature or mass mailing with intent to deceive voters.

California Elections Code section 18304 provides analogous protections against deceptive election use of county and other local agency seals. Beyond those narrow election -context protections, however, State law does not provide a comprehensive framework for protecting municipal seals, logos, and insignia from unauthorized use, commercial appropriation, or false implications of City endorsement. California cities accordingly adopt local ordinances under their police power (Cal.

Const. art. XI, § 7) to fill this gap. Because the City of Marina is a charter city, the regulatio n of its own seal, logo, and insignia is a municipal affair, and the City acts under its home-rule authority over municipal affairs (Cal. Const. art. XI, § 5) in addition to its general police power (Cal. Const. art. XI, § 7).

Practices of Other California Cities.

City Attorney and Staff surveyed comparable California cities that have adopted insignia - protection ordinances and reviewed the article “Who Gets to Use Agency Seals, Logos, Letterhead and Other Insignia?” published by the Institute for Local Government. Substantive ordinances on this subject have been adopted by the cities of Riverside (RMC ch. 1.04), Santa Rosa (SRCC ch. 1-04), Encinitas (EMC ch. 1.18), Santa Monica (SMMC ch. 2.32), Poway (PMC ch. 1.16), Hermosa Beach (HBMC ch. 1.06, amended 2023), Corona do (CMC § 1.02.070), Ontario (OMC ch. 2-4), and Lemoore (LMC § 1-11-3), Pittsburg (PMC ch. 1.28), among others.

While ordinance details vary, the model includes consistent elements: definitions of seal, logo, and insignia; assignment of custodianship; limitation of use to official business or City-authorized use; a permit or approval process for third -party use; pro hibitions on commercial, deceptive, and political uses; and a tiered set of remedies including criminal, administrative, and civil enforcement.

Proposed Ordinance.

The proposed ordinance adds Chapter 1.16 to Title 1 of the Marina Municipal Code. It is modeled on the approach used by other California cities and tailored to Marina. Key features:

a. Custody. The City Clerk is designated custodian of the Official City Seal, consistent with existing practice. The City Manager is designated custodian of the City Logo and other City Insignia and is authorized to issue administrative guidelines for day -to-day staff use.

b. Definitions. The term “City Insignia” is defined broadly to include the current City Logo, the Official City Seal, the prior 1975 logo, departmental patches, the City ’s website banner, letterhead and business card designs, and any other City -owned intellectual property used to identify the City or its departments. Inclusion of the prior 1975 logo is included because, although superseded for official use, it has not been dedicated to the public domain and remains City property. 2 c. Standards for Third-Party Use. The ordinance limits eligibility for third-party use to governmental entities and organizations exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and only in connection with a specific, identified event for a defined period with stated starting and ending dates. The ordinance codifies and refines the standards the Council has historically applied when evaluating third -party requests, including the standard articulated in Resolution No. 2003-132 (Marina Rotary Club). The Council retains exclusive authority to approve third-party use, with the City Clerk receiving applications and the City Manager forwarding them with a Staff recommendation. The ordinance further directs the Council to act on each application on the enumerated, objective standards, requires a decision within sixty (60) days after an application is complete, and limits revocation to a material breach of the conditions of approva l. Any approved use must reproduce the Insignia in its entirety without alteration, must remain legible when enlarged or reduced, and does not authorize any future or recurring use.

d. Anti-Trademark Provision. The ordinance expressly prohibits approval of any use that would involve registration of City Insignia, in whole or in part, as a privately-held trademark. This provision addresses an issue not present in older municipal ordinances but raised by recent third-party requests.

e. Souvenirs and Merchandise . The ordinance preserves the City ’s ability to manufacture and sell its own branded merchandise, with proceeds deposited to the City treasury.

f. Political Use Prohibition . The ordinance parallels California Government Code section 34501.5 by prohibiting use of City Insignia in a campaign or election -related communication in a manner reasonably calculated to convey a false impression of City sponsorship or approval, or othe rwise intended to deceive the voters, with narrow exceptions for City-issued communications and ceremonial accessories. The ordinance also addresses use of City -branded clothing and items by Councilmembers and City officials, permitting such use at nonpartisan City events but prohibiting it at campaign or partisan political events or when appearing in an individual capacity, and requires a conspicuous disclaimer (“This communication is not sponsored or approved by the City of Marina ”) when City facilities or other City resources are depicted in campaign materials.

g. Enforcement. Violations are subject to (i) prosecution under Chapter 1.08 (Code Violations); (ii) administrative citation and fines under Chapter 1.12 (Administrative Fines); and (iii) civil action under Chapter 1.10 (Civil Enforcement), including injunction, abateme nt of public nuisance, disgorgement of profits, damages, and attorneys’ fees. Remedies are cumulative. Where a violation is committed by a member of the City Council, the Council may also adopt a resolution of censure as a nonexclusive remedy.

h. Preservation of Existing Program . The 2008 Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines remain in effect, and the new chapter operates alongside and supplements those Guidelines.

Other Considerations.

The narrow scope of the political use prohibition (use of the City Insignia specifically, rather than political speech generally), the express exception for City communications, the requirement that any prohibited use be intended to deceive or reasonably likely to create a false impression that the communication is authorized or endorsed by the City, and the parallel structure to California 3 Government Code section 34501.5 and to ordinances upheld in other California jurisdictions supports the provision’s validity.

The ordinance ’s permit and approval process (Sections 1.16.090 and 1.16.100) is likewise structured to guide the Council’s decision through the enumerated, objective factors in Section

1.16.100, limits eligibility and the scope and duration of any approved use, requires action on each completed application within a defined period, and limits revocation to a material breach o f the conditions of approval. These provisions confine official discretion and supply the narrow, objective standards that for a permissible licensing scheme .

The prohibited-use standards in Section 1.16.060 are framed in neutral terms. The ordinance bars uses that are deceptive or fraudulent, that falsely imply City endorsement, or that dilute or impair the distinctiveness or integrity of the City Insignia, rather than uses that merely reflect unfavorably on the City. This focus on confusion, deception, and dilution, which are interests the City may legitimately protect, avoids conditioning use of the Insignia on the content or viewpoint of a speaker’s message.

CEQA:

Adoption of the ordinance is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act under State CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(5), as it is an administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adoption of the ordinance itself has no direct fiscal impact. Implementation will be accomplished within existing staff resources. Enforcement actions, if pursued, may generate cost recovery through administrative fines, civil judgments, disgorgement of pr ofits, and attorneys ’ fees, and may reduce the number of ad hoc logo-use items requiring individual Council consideration.

CONCLUSION:

The attached proposed ordinance is submitted for Council consideration for first reading and introduction of the ordinance.

ATTACHMENT:

Ordinance No. 2026-, Adding Chapter 1.16 (Custody and Use of City Seal, City Logo, and City Insignia) to Title 1 (General Provisions) of the Marina Municipal Code

Respectfully submitted,
_________________________
Rene Alejandro Ortega
City Attorney

REVIEWED/CONCUR:

________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina

4 ORDINANCE NO. 2026-

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 1.16 (CUSTODY AND USE OF THE CITY SEAL, CITY LOGO, AND CITY INSIGNIA) TO TITLE 1 (GENERAL PROVISIONS) OF THE

MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH THE OFFICIAL CITY SEAL, LOGO, AND INSIGNIA OF THE CITY OF MARINA; TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR CUSTODY, PERMITTED USES, AND PROTECTION; TO PROVIDE FOR A PERMIT PROCESS FOR LIMITED THIRD -PARTY USE; TO PROHIBIT UNAUTHORIZED USE; AND

TO ESTABLISH PENALTIES AND REMEDIES
WHEREAS, the City of Marina (the "City") recognizes the importance of developing and maintaining a unified and distinctive municipal identity through its official seal, logo, and other insignia; and
WHEREAS, on January 8, 2008, by Resolution No. 2008-09, the City Council approved the design concept for the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program; and WHEREAS, on October 7, 2008, by Resolution No. 2008 -205, the City Council approved the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines, which established design standards and application protocols for the use of the City logo and Official City Seal; and WHEREAS, the City of Marina is the registered owner of the City Logo and Official City Seal under United States Copyright Office Registration Nos. VA 1 -692-471 and VA 1 -692-474, effective November 17, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the prior (1975 -era) City logo, although superseded for official use, remains the intellectual property of the City and has not been dedicated to the public domain; and WHEREAS, California Government Code section 34501.5 makes it a misdemeanor for any person to use any reproduction or facsimile of a city seal in any campaign literature or mass mailing with intent to deceive the voters, and California Elections Code section 18304 makes it a misdemeanor to make deceptive use of county and other local agency seals in election communications; and WHEREAS, beyond the limited protections afforded by State law, there is no comprehensive statutory framework governing third -party use of municipal seals, logos, and insignia, and individual California cities have therefore adopted local ordinances to protect their brand identity, prevent confusion or false implication of City endorsement, and preserve their ability to enforce their intellectual property rights; and
WHEREAS, the City of Marina is a charter city, and the custody, use, and protection of the City’s own seal, logo, and insignia is a municipal affair as to which the City exercises its home -rule authority under Article XI, Section 5 of the California Constitution, in addition to its police power under Article XI, Section 7; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has, on prior occasions, considered ad hoc requests for use of the City logo on a resolution-by-resolution basis, including but not limited to Resolution Nos. 2003 - 132, 2005-205, 2006-143, 2006-180, and 2008-84, but has not previo usly codified the standards or procedures applicable to such requests; and
5 WHEREAS, the City desires to codify a uniform framework for the custody, permitted use, and protection of its seal, logo, and other insignia, consistent with best practices adopted by other California cities; and

WHEREAS, the adoption of this ordinance is not a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") under State CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(5), in that it constitutes an administrative activity of govern ment that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Findings.

The City Council hereby finds and determines that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein as findings of the City Council.

SECTION 2. Chapter 1.16 Added.

Chapter 1.16 (Custody and Use of City Seal, City Logo, and City Insignia) is hereby added to Title 1 (General Provisions) of the Marina Municipal Code to read as follows:

“Chapter 1.16

CUSTODY AND USE OF CITY SEAL,

CITY LOGO, AND CITY INSIGNIA

Sections:

1.16.010 Purpose.

1.16.020 Definitions.

1.16.030 Property rights – Trademark and copyright protection.

1.16.040 Custodianship.

1.16.050 Authorized uses by the City and City personnel.

1.16.060 Prohibited uses.

1.16.070 Manufacture and sale of souvenirs and merchandise.

1.16.080 Use in political campaigns prohibited.

1.16.090 Permit application for third-party use.

1.16.100 Standards for approval of third-party use.

1.16.110 Penalties and remedies.

1.16.120 No waiver of City rights.

1.16.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to:

A. Establish the official City Seal, City Logo, and other City Insignia of the City of Marina; B. Provide for the custody, control, and protection of the City Seal, City Logo, and City Insignia;
C. Specify the authorized uses of the City Seal, City Logo, and City Insignia by the City and by third party organizations;
D. Establish a permit process under which such limited third-party use may be approved by the City Council;
E. Prohibit unauthorized, deceptive, commercial, or politically-motivated uses; F. Protect the City’s intellectual property rights, brand integrity, and reputation; and 6 G. Avoid public confusion regarding whether a statement, event, product, or organization is endorsed, sponsored, or authorized by the City.

1.16.020 Definitions.

For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply:

A. “City” means the City of Marina, California.

B. “City Council” means the City Council of the City of Marina.

C. “City Clerk” means the City Clerk of the City of Marina or his or her designee.

D. “City Manager” means the City Manager of the City of Marina or his or her designee.

E. “City Logo” means the official logo of the City as adopted by the City Council on January 8, 2008 by Resolution No. 2008-09 and as described in the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines adopted on October 7, 2008 by Resolution No. 2008- 205, which depicts an emblem-shaped border surrounding illustrative elements representing the Pacific Ocean as viewed from Marina’s location on the Monterey Bay, with the words “City of Marina” centered in the design, and which is registered with the United States Copyright Office under Registration No. VA 1-692-471.

F. “City Seal” means the Official City Seal of the City as described in the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines, comprising a line-art version of the City Logo with an engraving-style treatment, designed for application by manual stamp or embossing on certificates, proclamations, and other official City documents, and which is registered with the United States Copyright Office under Registration No. VA 1-692-474.

G. “Prior City Logo” means the City logo used by the City prior to the adoption of the current City Logo, depicting the word “Marina” in stylized script over a stylized bay and sun image with the year 1975, which remains the intellectual property of the City and has not been dedicated to the public domain.

H. “City Insignia” means, collectively, the City Seal, City Logo, Prior City Logo, any departmental badge, patch, emblem, mark, or logo, the City’s website banner, the City’s letterhead and business card designs, any variation or modification of any of the foregoing approved by the City Council, and any other intellectual property right owned by the City and used to identify the City or any of its departments, programs, or events.

I. “Commercial use” means any use of the City Insignia in connection with the sale, advertisement, or promotion of any product, service, or business for profit, but does not include use by the City itself or by a person authorized by the City Council pursuant to this chapter.

J. “Person” means any individual, partnership, firm, association, corporation, limited liability company, unincorporated organization, or other legal entity.

1.16.030 Property rights – Trademark and copyright protection.

A. The City Seal, City Logo, Prior City Logo, and all other City Insignia are the exclusive property of the City of Marina.

B. The City Logo and City Seal are registered with the United States Copyright Office under Registration Nos. VA 1-692-471 and VA 1-692-474, respectively.

7 C. The City Manager is authorized, in consultation with the City Attorney, to take such further steps as the City Manager deems necessary or appropriate to protect the City’s rights in the City Insignia, including but not limited to:

1. Registration of the City Insignia as trademarks or service marks under federal or state law;

2. Enforcement of the City’s copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights against unauthorized users; and

3. Renewal and maintenance of existing intellectual property registrations.

D. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit, transfer, or waive any intellectual property right of the City in the City Insignia. No approval granted under this chapter conveys ownership of, or any trademark or copyright interest in, the City Insignia.

1.16.040 Custodianship.

A. The City Clerk shall be the custodian of the official City Seal and shall affix the City Seal to all ordinances, resolutions, certificates, proclamations, and other documents as required by law, by this Code, or by ordinance or resolution of the City Council.

B. The City Manager shall be the custodian of the City Logo and all other City Insignia, and shall be responsible for ensuring their consistent application in accordance with the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines and any successor bran ding standards adopted by the City Council.

C. The City Manager may adopt administrative procedures, style guides, and supplemental guidelines, consistent with this chapter and the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program, governing the day-to-day use of the City Insignia by City personnel.

1.16.050 Authorized uses by the City and City personnel.

A. The City Seal, City Logo, and City Insignia may be used, in accordance with the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines:

1. By the City for purposes directly connected with the official business of the City of Marina, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, departments, and employees;

2. On City stationery, business cards, printed materials, vehicles, uniforms, equipment, facilities, signs, websites, and digital communications;

3. On official City publications, presentations, certificates, proclamations, badges, patches, and similar materials;

4. By City officers, employees, and members of the City Council, City boards, commissions, and committees while acting within the scope of their office or employment;

5. By a recognized employee organization, on stationery or printed materials used within the scope of its representation of City employees, and on articles of clothing intended for use by City employees in the course of their employment; and

6. By a vendor or contractor of the City, but only as necessary to perform a contract with the City and only in the manner approved by the City Manager.

8 B. All uses under this section shall conform to the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines and any successor branding standards adopted by the City Council.

1.16.060 Prohibited uses.

Except as expressly authorized under section 1.16.050, or pursuant to an approval granted by the City Council under sections 1.16.090 and 1.16.100, it shall be unlawful for any person or entity to:

A. Use, reproduce, distribute, sell, give away, display, or affix the City Seal, City Logo, Prior City Logo, or any other City Insignia, or any reproduction or facsimile thereof, or any design so closely resembling the same as to be apt to deceive or be reasonably mistaken for the same;
B. Alter, modify, deface, or create derivative works of the City Insignia; C. Use the City Insignia in any manner that:

1. Suggests, implies, or could reasonably be interpreted to suggest or imply that the City endorses, sponsors, approves, or is otherwise affiliated with any person, event, product, service, organization, statement, viewpoint, or position;

2. Is deceptive or fraudulent;

3. Is for a commercial purpose, including the use of the City Insignia on any product offered for sale;

4. Is discriminatory or in violation of any federal, state, or local law; or

5. Dilutes or impairs, or is likely to dilute or impair, the distinctiveness or integrity of the City Insignia; or

D. Apply for, file, register, or seek to register any City Insignia, in whole or in part, or any mark or design incorporating any City Insignia, as a trademark, service mark, copyright, or other intellectual property right with any state, federal, or international authority.

1.16.070 Manufacture and sale of souvenirs and merchandise.

A. Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the City, or any person authorized in writing by the City Manager, from manufacturing, distributing, selling, or giving away clothing, promotional items, souvenirs, or other merchandise bearing the City Insignia f or the purpose of promoting the City of Marina.

B. The proceeds, if any, of the City’s sale of merchandise bearing the City Insignia shall be deposited into the City treasury and used for public purposes as directed by the City Council.

1.16.080 Use in political campaigns prohibited.

A. The City Council finds that the use or depiction of the City Insignia in a campaign or election-related communication may be reasonably calculated to convey the false impression of sponsorship or approval by the City. No person, candidate, campaign committee, political action committee, or other entity, including any elected or appointed officer of the City, shall use the City Seal, City Logo, Prior City Logo, or any other City Insignia, or any design so closely resembling the same as to be apt to deceive o r be reasonably mistaken for the same, in a manner reasonably calculated to convey such a false 9 impression of sponsorship or approval, or otherwise intended to deceive the voters, for the purpose of:

1. Supporting or opposing the nomination or election of any person to any City, county, state, or federal office;

2. Supporting or opposing any ballot measure or initiative; or

3. Influencing the action of the electorate, or any portion thereof, in any election.

B. The prohibition in subsection A does not apply to:

1. Communications issued by the City of Marina or the City Council as a whole pursuant to law; or

2. Nametags or other ceremonial accessories officially issued by the City for use by elected or appointed officials acting in their official capacity.

C. Use by Councilmembers and other City officials. A Councilmember or other elected or appointed City official may wear clothing, or display items, officially produced by the City and depicting the City Insignia when appearing at a City -produced, City -sponsored, or other nonpartisan event, or when representing or appearing on behalf of the City Council as a whole. A Councilmember or other City official may not wear clothing or display items depicting the City Insignia when attending a campaign event or partisan political event, or when appearing in their individual capacity.

D. Depiction of City facilities and resources; disclaimer. Because the depiction of City facilities or other City resources in a publication may be reasonably calculated to convey the false impression of sponsorship or approval by the City, no person oth er than the City may depict City facilities or other City resources on any campaign material, including clothing, accessories, and paid or unpaid political advertising, content, or materials advocating for or against the election of any candidate, the passage of any measure, or the approval or rejection of any item before the City Council, without conspicuously including the disclaimer: “This communication is not sponsored or approved by the City of Marina.” For purposes of this subsection, City facilities and other City resources include, but are not limited to, City Hall, other publicly owned and prominently recognizable City buildings , facilities, or structures, and City-owned vehicles.

E. This section is intended to supplement, and operate independently of and in addition to, California Government Code section 34501.5, California Elections Code section 18304, and any other applicable State law.

1.16.090 Permit application for third-party use.

A. Third -party use of the City Insignia may be approved only for governmental entities or organizations that are exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and only in connection with a specific, identified event and for a defined period with stated starting and ending dates. An eligible organization seeking to use the City Insignia for any purpose not authorized under section 1.16.050 shall submit a written Permit Application to the City Clerk in the form approved by the City Manager.

10 B. The Permit Application shall include, at a minimum:

1. The name, address, and contact information of the applicant, and, unless applicant is a governmental entity, proof that the applicant is an organization exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code;

2. A description of the proposed use, including the specific event in connection with which the City Insignia will be used, the medium, format, quantity, geographic scope, location, and the starting and ending dates of the use;

3. A sample, mock -up, or proof of the proposed use depicting how the City Insignia will appear;

4. A statement of the public purpose served by the proposed use and the benefit, if any, to the City of Marina and its residents;

5. A statement of whether the applicant is engaged in or intends to engage in any political advertising or any commercial use;

6. A statement of whether the applicant intends to register the proposed use, in whole or in part, as a trademark, service mark, or other intellectual property right; and

7. Such additional information as the City Manager may reasonably require.

C. The City Manager shall review each completed Permit Application and shall transmit the application, together with a staff recommendation, to the City Council for consideration at a regular or special meeting. The City Council shall act to grant, condi tionally grant, or deny each completed application within sixty (60) days after the application is deemed complete.

D. No Permit Application shall be deemed approved except upon the affirmative action of the City Council by resolution.

1.16.100 Standards for approval of third-party use.

A. In acting on a Permit Application, the City Council shall consider the following factors:

1. Whether the proposed use serves a civic, community, educational, charitable, or governmental purpose, or supports an activity or event conducted in cooperation with, or for the benefit of, the City of Marina or its residents;

2. Whether the proposed use is connected with a City -sponsored, City-co-sponsored, or City-recognized event, program, or function;

3. Whether the proposed use is limited in scope, duration, and geographic reach;

4. Whether the proposed use will be consistent with the Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines and will not alter, modify, deface, or diminish the City Insignia;

5. Whether the proposed use is likely to cause confusion as to whether the applicant or its activities are endorsed, sponsored, or authorized by the City;

6. Whether the applicant has agreed to refrain from any political advertising or activity using the City Insignia;

7. Whether the applicant has agreed not to register the proposed use, in whole or in part, as a trademark, service mark, or other intellectual property right; and 11 8. Whether the proposed use is likely to dilute, or to impair the distinctiveness or integrity of, the City Insignia.

B. The City Council may, by resolution, approve a Permit Application subject to conditions, including but not limited to:

1. Identification of the specific event for which the use is authorized and the starting and ending dates of the authorized use, and limitations on the duration, quantity, and geographic scope of the use;

2. Requirements that the applicant submit final artwork or proofs for review and approval prior to production;

3. A requirement that the applicant provide a copy of the final product or publication to the City;

4. A requirement that the applicant enter into a written license agreement on terms approved by the City Attorney;

5. A requirement that the applicant indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from any claims arising out of the authorized use;

6. A reservation of the City’s right to revoke the approval at any time, upon written notice, for any material breach of the conditions of approval; and

7. A prohibition on any sublicensing, assignment, or transfer of the approved use.

C. Approval of a Permit Application does not transfer to the applicant any ownership of, or trademark, copyright, or other intellectual property interest in, the City Insignia. All such rights remain with the City.

D. No approval shall be granted that authorizes the inclusion of any City Insignia in any mark, design, or composite that the applicant intends to register, or has registered, as a trademark, service mark, or other intellectual property right with any state or federal authority.

E. Conditions applicable to all approved use. Any use of the City Insignia approved under this chapter, whether by an organization or any other third party, is subject to the following conditions, whether or not separately stated in the approval:

1. The City Insignia shall be reproduced in its entirety, with no alterations, and no element of the City Insignia may be isolated, used alone, or used in combination with any other art, symbol, or words;

2. The reproduction of the City Insignia shall be clear and legible whenever it is enlarged or reduced; and

3. The City’s approval of a particular use does not constitute approval of any future or recurring use, each of which requires separate approval under this chapter.

1.16.110 Penalties and remedies.

A. Each violation of this chapter shall constitute an infraction or misdemeanor, in the discretion of the City Attorney, and shall be subject to the penalties and procedures set forth in Chapter 1.08 (Code Violations) of this Code.

12 B. In addition to or as an alternative to the penalties set forth in subsection A, any violation of this chapter may be enforced by administrative citation and administrative fines pursuant to Chapter 1.12 (Administrative Fines) of this Code.

C. Each day a violation continues, and each separate use of the City Insignia in violation of this chapter, shall constitute a separate offense.

D. In addition to any criminal or administrative remedy, the City may bring a civil action pursuant to Chapter 1.10 (Civil Enforcement) of this Code, or under any other authority available to it, to enjoin any violation of this chapter, to abate the violation as a public nuisance, to recover damages, to obtain disgorgement of profits derived from any unauthorized use, to recover the City’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, and to pursue any other remedy available at law or in equity, including any remedy a vailable under federal or state intellectual property law.

E. Where a violation of this chapter is committed by a member of the City Council, the City Council may, in addition to or as an alternative to any other remedy provided by this chapter or by law, adopt a resolution of censure condemning the violation. A resolution of censure is a nonexclusive remedy and does not limit any other penalty or remedy available under this chapter or applicable law.

F. The remedies in this section are cumulative and in addition to all other remedies available to the City under law.

1.16.120 No waiver of City rights.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit, waive, or impair any right of the City under federal or state intellectual property law, contract, common law, or otherwise. The City expressly reserves all rights in the City Insignia.

SECTION 3. Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Continued in Effect.

The Citywide Public Sign and Identity Program Guidelines, adopted by Resolution No. 2008-205, shall remain in full force and effect and shall be construed consistently with the chapter added by this ordinance. To the extent any conflict exists between this ordinance and the Guidelines, this ordinance shall control.

SECTION 4. Prior Resolutions.

Existing City Council resolutions approving the use of the City Insignia by third parties shall remain in effect according to their terms, but any renewal, extension, or modification of such approval shall be subject to the chapter added by this ordinance.

SECTION 5. CEQA.

The City Council finds that adoption of this ordinance is not a “project” subject to the California Environmental Quality Act under State CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(5), as it is an administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

SECTION 6. Severability.

If any provision of this ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable.

SECTION 7. Effective Date.

This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

13 SECTION 8. Publication.

The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published in the manner required by Council resolution.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina held on the 16th day of June 2026.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina, duly held on the 7th day of July 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:

______________________________
Bruce Delgado, Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
Anita Sharp, City Clerk

Marina City CouncilJune 16, 2026

Marina City Council
June 16, 2026