Maywood City Council
October 25, 2023

14000 E. Valley Blvd., City of Industry, CA 91746 | P: (626) 961-9326 | unitedstormwater.com

ATTACHMENTS
o Catch Basin Cleaning Cost Proposal Form

● REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

MUNICIPAL STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN CLEANING
(RFP 2023-01)

CATCH BASIN CLEANING COST PROPOSAL FORM
Company Name and Address:

Proposal pricing shall be based on a per catch basin costs and shall include the following work to be performed:

Each Company shall inspect at regular intervals and clear all debris in catch basins within the jurisdiction of the Contracting Agencies with which the Company has entered into a contract a minimum of one time between May 1 and September 30 of each year. In addition, the Company shall perform one inspection of all catch basins within the jurisdiction of the Contracting Agencies with which the Company has entered into a contract during the months of October, January, and April. The Los Angeles MS4 Permit requires trash capture inserts be cleaned at regular intervals to maintain efficiency. The Company shall not perform repair, maintenance or other work that would require a Contractor’s License or the payment of prevailing wages. The Company shall report to the appropriate Contracting Agency any damaged catch basin screens and missing stenciling requirements. The Company shall report evidence of rodents and/or vectors breeding/living in the storm drain system to the appropriate Contracting Agencies within twenty-four (24) hours of discovery.

The Company shall be responsible for developing and implementing traffic control procedures in accordance with California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (latest addition). The Contracting Agency may request written copies of Traffic Control Plans for collector or arterial streets, if necessary. The Company shall take a photo documenting the before and after conditions of all debris cleaning, from the same vantage points, in an amount not less than five (5) of each condition. All photos shall be at least 4 MP in quality, in .jpg format, labeled such that it is easy to identify each catch basin location and submitted with the invoice to the appropriate Contracting Agency.

Proposal prices shall be guaranteed.

Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Total
ARS Catch Basin 1,000 each $ $
CPS Catch Basin 9,500 each $ $
ARS & CPS Catch Basin 4,000 each $ $
Non-retrofitted Catch Basin 3,000 each $ $
Total $
Authorized Signature Date

AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF MAYWOOD
AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.

DATE: October 25, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JENNIFER VASQUEZ, CITY MANAGER
BY: OKAN DEMIRCI, CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CARE FOR THE

CHILDREN DBA CFTC PAINTING FOR THE CITYWIDE CURB NUMBERING PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT OF $68,000.00 AND APPROVE THE BUDGET CONTINGENCY

ALLOWANCE
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Citywide Curb Numbering Project, award a contract to Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting for the City Wide Curb Numbering Project in a total amount of $68,000.00, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract and approve the budget contingency allowance of 15% of the construction contract amount.

BACKGROUND:

The project includes removal of existing and installation of new curb house numbering Citywide and related work.

The proposed improvements will be completed within 30 working days.

On September 14, 2023, staff advertised Notice Inviting Bids (NIB) on the local newspaper in conformance with City of Maywood Municipal Code Section 3-7.04. Bids were due on October 4, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

DISCUSSION:

On October 4, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., a total of one (1) bid was received as shown below:

Contractor Name (from low to high cost) Bid Amount
Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting $68,000.00
Staff conducted a bid analysis for the apparent 1st low bidder, Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting, and verified CA contractor’s licensing, Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) registration, state and federal debarment files, and references. Based on the bid analysis, Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting was found to be the lowest responsive bidder.

Staff recommends City Council award a contract to Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting for a total amount of $68,000.00 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.

In addition, the City Engineer has reviewed the design plans for the project and in his opinion the design is reasonable and meets professional engineering standards. Therefore, the City Engineer recommends that the City Council also approve the plan and specifications, which are on file in the Department of Public Works.

The proposed project is a project subject to CEQA. Staff has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that it is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302: Replacement or reconstruction; (c) Replacement or reconstruction of existing utility and/or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney has reviewed this report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total estimated project cost of $91,020.00 will be funded through Gas Tax funds and is included in the 2023/24 Capital Improvement Program, (Project #6214).

Construction Contract $68,000.00
Contingency Budget allowance for unforeseen conditions as necessary (15%)
$10,200.00
Total Construction Budget $78,200.00
Project Management $5,000.00
Construction management and inspection $7,820.00
Project Total $91,020.00

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. CFTC Bid

2. Bid Analysis - Citywide Curb Numbering

3. Agreement with Care for the Children

Attachment No. 2 –
Care For The Children
DBA CFTC Painting Bid

Qty Unit Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price
1 Removal of exisitng curb numbering and installation/painting of new address numbers to curbs. 6,800 EA $10.00 $68,000.00 $10.00 $68,000.00 $10.00 $10.00 Apparent Low
Bidder 1
$68,000.00
$68,000.00
$0.00
0% $0.00
N/A
TOTAL $0.00

SUBCONTRACTORS

TOTAL BID AMOUNT CALCULATED BASED ON UNIT PRICES

IS THE BIDDER QUALIFIED BASED ON REFERENCE PROJECTS

CALCULATION CORRECTIONS TO BID AMOUNT SUBMITTED BY CONTRACTOR BASED

ON CALCULATED BID AMOUNT

BID RANKING
SUBCONTRACTOR % AND AMOUNT SHOWN IN THE BID

TOTAL BID AMOUNT INDICATED BY BIDDER
YES

1. BID TABULATION
Bid Item and Description

BID TABULATION
Apparent Low Bidder 1
Care For The Children dba
CFTC Painting
PROJECT NAME: CITYWIDE CURB NUMBERING, CITY PROJECT ID: 6117

HIGHEST

UNIT BID
PRICE

AVERAGE BID VALUES LOWEST

UNIT BID
PRICE
D:\Dropbox (Transtech Engineers)\JOBRECRD\2023\231075 MAY CITYWIDE CURB HOUSE NUMBERING BID PACKAGE\WIP\7.BID ANALYSIS\2.OD REVIEW, 10-12-23\0.BID ANALYSIS, MAY, CITYWIDE CURB NUMBERING, 10-12-23BID TABULATION 1 of 4
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 1 of 22

APPARENT LOW BID AMOUNT: $68,000.00

REVIEW RESULT BY DATE
YES CITY CLERK 10/12/23
YES DT 10/12/23
N/A DT 10/12/23
YES DT 10/12/23
$0.00 DT 10/12/23

50.00% DT 10/12/23
100.00% DT 10/12/23
YES DT 10/12/23

50.00% DT 10/12/23

0.00% DT 10/12/23
YES DT 10/12/23
PRIME CONTRACTOR LICENSE STATUS: Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting 1040225 DT 10/12/23 PRIME CONTRACTOR DIR REGISTRATION STATUS: Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting 1000420383 DT 10/12/23 SUB CONTRACTOR LICENSE STATUS: N/A N/A DT 10/12/23
SUB CONTRACTOR DIR REGISTRATION STATUS: N/A N/A DT 10/12/23

PRIME CONTRACTOR DEBARMENT STATUS FROM STATE
CONTRACTS: Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting NOT ON STATE DEBARRED LIST DT 10/12/23

PRIME CONTRACTOR DEBARMENT STATUS FROM
FEDERAL CONTRACTS: Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting NOT ON FEDERAL DEBARRED LIST DT 10/12/23

SUB CONTRACTOR DEBARMENT STATUS FROM STATE
CONTRACTS: N/A N/A DT 10/12/23

SUB CONTRACTOR DEBARMENT STATUS FROM FEDERAL
CONTRACTS: N/A N/A DT 10/12/23
YES DT 10/12/23
BID STAMPED AS RECEIVED PRIOR BID TIME:

2. REVIEW OF APPARENT LOW BID
APPARENT LOW BID SUBMITTED BY: Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting

ITEM REVIEWED/CHECKED REMARKS
BID BOND IN PROPER AMOUNT:

ADDENDA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

TOTAL BID PRICES CALCULATED CORRECTLY:

SUBCONTRACTOR AMOUNT:

MIN PRIME CONTRACTOR % REQUIREMENT FOR WORK PER SPECIFICATIONS:

PRIME CONTRACTOR % CALCULATED PER BID SUBMITTAL (THIS % MUST BE EQUAL OR MORE THAN ABOVE %):

Print-out from DIR Web Page attached (https://efiling.dir.ca.gov/PWCR/Search) BIDDER COMPLIES WITH MIN PRIME CONTRACTOR % REQUIREMENT:

MAX ALLOWABLE SUBCONTRACTOR PERCENT PER SPECIFICATIONS:

SUB CONTRACTOR % CALCULATED PER BID SUBMITTAL (THIS % MUST BE EQUAL OR LESS THAN ABOVE %):

BIDDER COMPLIES WITH MAX. SUB CONTRACTOR % REQUIREMENT:

Print-out from CLSB Web Page attached (http://www.cslb.ca.gov/) Print-out from DIR Web Page attached (https://efiling.dir.ca.gov/PWCR/Search) Print-out from DCA Web Page attached (https://search.dca.ca.gov/) REFERENCE CHECK ACCEPTABLE: See Reference Check
Print-out from DIR Web Page attached (http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html) Print-out from SAM Web Page attached (https://www.sam.gov/SAM/) Print-out from DIR Web Page attached (http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html) Print-out from SAM Web Page attached (https://www.sam.gov/SAM/) D:\Dropbox (Transtech Engineers)\JOBRECRD\2023\231075 MAY CITYWIDE CURB HOUSE NUMBERING BID PACKAGE\WIP\7.BID ANALYSIS\2.OD REVIEW, 10-12-23\0.BID ANALYSIS, MAY, CITYWIDE CURB NUMBERING, 10-12-23REVIEW OF APPARENT LOW BID 2 of 4 Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 2 of 22

REFERENCE PROJECT OWNER AND REFERENCE
NAME

CONTACT & TELEPHONEAMOUNTDATE COMPLETEDDID THE CONTRACTOR DO QUALITY WORKDID THE CONTRACTOR STAY ON SCHEDULEDID THE CONTRACTOR ASK FOR UNNECESSARY CHANGE ORDERSDID THE CONTRACTOR FILE CLAIMS AGAINST YOUWILL YOU HIRE THE CONTRACTOR AGAIN

REMARKS
City wide Curb House
Numbers Project 23-06 City of Duarte
Marvin Carpio
626-357-7931
Ext 262
$60,000.00 4/1/2023
Curbside House Painting
Project City of Cudahy
Juan
Rodriguez
323-773-5143
Ext 259
$10,731.00 7/11/2023 YES YES NO NO YES Contractor is easy to work with. DT 10/12/2023 City Numbering Service
2023 City of La Mirada Priscilla Yi 562-902-2374 $6,875.00 7/11/2023 YESSee note 1. YES NO NO YES Note 1: Contractor had conflict with the
neighboring jurisdiction, however, the
issued were resolved prior to project
acceptance.

DT 10/12/2023
City Numbering Painting
Program FY 2021-20222 City of Laguna Niguel Jeff Metz949-362-4337 $45,477.00 6/6/2022 YESSee note 1. YES NO NO YES Contractor performed satisfactorily for the
most part, however, there were a few
locations incorrectly done. Contractor
applied the corrections.

DT 10/12/2023

3. REFERENCE CHECK OF APPARENT LOW BIDDER

REFERENCE CHECK FOR APPARENT LOW BIDDER

CHECKED BY
DATE
Answer "YES" if satisfied or "NO" if not satisfied

REFERENCE DATA FOR APPARENT LOW BIDDER
Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting
D:\Dropbox (Transtech Engineers)\JOBRECRD\2023\231075 MAY CITYWIDE CURB HOUSE NUMBERING BID PACKAGE\WIP\7.BID ANALYSIS\2.OD REVIEW, 10-12-23\0.BID ANALYSIS, MAY, CITYWIDE CURB NUMBERING, 10-12-23REF CHECK 3 of 4 Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 3 of 22

Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting
$68,000.00

4. LOWEST RESPONSIVE BID
LOWEST RESPONSIVE BID SUBMITTED BY:

IN THE AMOUNT OF:

D:\Dropbox (Transtech Engineers)\JOBRECRD\2023\231075 MAY CITYWIDE CURB HOUSE NUMBERING BID PACKAGE\WIP\7.BID ANALYSIS\2.OD REVIEW, 10-12-23\0.BID ANALYSIS, MAY, CITYWIDE CURB NUMBERING, 10-12-23LOWEST RESPONSIVE BID 4 of 4 Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 4 of 22

Copyright © 2023 State of California
Data current as of 10/12/2023 10:32:45 AM
Home | Online Services | License Details
Contractor's License Detail for License # 1040225
DISCLAIMER: A license status check provides information taken from the CSLB license database. Before relying on this information, you should be aware of the following limitations.

Business Information

CARE FOR THE CHILDREN
PO BOX 3144
WHITTIER, CA 90605
Business Phone Number:(888) 490-9751
Entity Corporation
Issue Date 06/05/2018
Expire Date 06/30/2024
License Status
This license is current and active.

All information below should be reviewed.

Classifications
C33 - PAINTING AND DECORATING
Bonding Information
Contractor's Bond
This license filed a Contractor's Bond with MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL).

Bond Number: 100061404
Bond Amount: $25,000
Effective Date: 05/22/2023
Contractor's Bond History
Bond of Qualifying Individual
This license filed Bond of Qualifying Individual number 100074500 for ROBERT GENE HENDERSON in the amount of $25,000 with MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL).

Effective Date: 06/05/2023
BQI's Bond History
Workers' Compensation
This license has workers compensation insurance with the SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY Policy Number:SWC1445068
Effective Date: 07/14/2023
Expire Date: 07/14/2024
Workers' Compensation History
CSLB complaint disclosure is restricted by law (B&P 7124.6) If this entity is subject to public complaint disclosure click on link that will appear below for more information. Click here for a definition of disclosable actions. 
 Only construction related civil judgments reported to CSLB are disclosed (B&P 7071.17).  Arbitrations are not listed unless the contractor fails to comply with the terms.  Due to workload, there may be relevant information that has not yet been entered into the board's license database.

Back to Top Conditions of Use Privacy Policy Accessibility Accessibility Certification Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 5 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM https://cadir.my.salesforce-sites.com/ContractorSearch/PrintRegDetails https://cadir.my.salesforce-sites.com/ContractorSearch/PrintRegDetails 1/2 Contractor Information
Legal Entity Name
Robert Henderson
Legal Entity Type
Corporation
Status
Active
Registration Number
PW-LR-1000420383
Registration effective date
7/17/2023
Registration expiration date
6/30/2025
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 3144  Whittier 90605 CA United States of A…
Physical Address
13128 Telegraph Road #A  Santa Fe Springs 90670 C…
Email Address
Trade Name/DBA
CFTC Painting
CFTC Painting
License Number(s)
CSLB:1040225
Registration History
Legal Entity Information
Corporation Number:

Federal Employment Identification Number:

President Name:

Robert Henderson
Vice President Name:

Eddie Cannon
Treasurer Name:

Michelle Henderson
Secretary Name:

Irene Shimanchik
CEO Name:

Robert Henderson
Agent of Service Name:

Robert Henderson
Agent of Service Mailing Address:
13128 Telegraph Road #A  Santa Fe Springs 90670 CA United States of America Effective Date    Expiration Date
7/1/2019 6/30/2020
7/1/2020 6/30/2021
7/1/2021 6/30/2022
10/4/2022 6/30/2023
7/17/2023 6/30/2025
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 6 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM https://cadir.my.salesforce-sites.com/ContractorSearch/PrintRegDetails https://cadir.my.salesforce-sites.com/ContractorSearch/PrintRegDetails 2/2 Workers Compensation
Do you lease employees
through Professional
Employer Organization
(PEO)?:

No
Please provide your
current workers
compensation insurance
information below:

PEO Information
PEO
Name
PEO
Phone
PEO
Email
Insured by Carrier
Policy Holder Name:Care For The ChildrenInsurance Carrier:

Security National Insurance CompanyPolicy Number:SWC1445068Inception date:
7/14/2017Expiration Date:7/14/2024
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 7 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 1/12
DLSE Debarments
The following is a list of contractors barred from bidding on, accepting, or performing any public works contracts, either as a contractor or subcontractor. Please refer to the “Period of Debarment” for status of debarment period as noted below:

As part of your due diligence, we suggest that you also check:

Contractor status at the Contractors State License Board (CSLB) The Federal debarment list at the Excluded Parties List System Name of contractor Period of debarment
MICHAEL FLOORING, INC.;

BENNY MICHAEL
CSLB License Number: 874947
5/30/2023 through 5/30/2026
Decision SC 7278 
The debarment order is currently
stayed by order of the Kern County
Superior Court
TOBO CONSTRUCTION, INC.;
JIMI WAN CHAE; MONICA SHIUN OH;

KYUNG JIN YOON,
CSLB License Number: 758012
5/10/2023 through 5/10/2026
Decision SC 7250 
G M Climate Control, Inc.

CSLB License Number: 967267
3/2/2023 through 9/2/2024
Decision 40-71536-603 

MINAKO AMERICA CORPORATION DBA MINCO
CONSTRUCTION;

AND REFAAT HILMAY MINA,
CSLB License Number: 612429
9/27/2021 through 9/26/2022
Decision LB 6333 


Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 8 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 2/12
GRFCO, INC. DBA ONSITE KRUSHING;
GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.;
GEORGE ROBERT FROST; AND JAMES CRAIG

JACKSON
CSLB License Number: 291013 and 84801
5/21/2021 through 5/20/2024
Decision LB 6629 
ECS CONTRACTORS, INC. dba ECS ELECTRIC, INC.;
UMAR KHALID RANA, an indvidual and CEO/RMO of
ECS CONTRACTORS, INC.; and KANWAL SAJJAD
RANA, an indvidual and RMO of ECS CONTRACTORS,
INC.

CSLB License Number: 975222
3/1/2020 through 3/1/2023
Decision LB 5590 
Avi Shechter, Individually
DBA Avi Shechter
CSLB Number: 908891 and 1018353
5/6/2019 through 5/5/2022
Decision LB 6328 
Patrick Kim, Individually
DBA Ritecon Plumbing
CSLB Number: 991018
8/21/2018 through 8/20/2019
Decision LB 6762 
Bighorn Construction, Inc.

CSLB Number: 597866
5/5/2018 through 5/4/2021
Decision LB 6658 
Doug Parks, Individually dba
Doug Parks and Son Plumbing
CSLB Number: 411825
10/11/2017 through 10/10/2019
Decision SC 5807 
Worthington Construction, Inc.;
Dale Worthington, an individual and CEO/RMO of
6/15/2018 through 9/16/2019
Decision LB 5267 
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 9 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 3/12
Worthington Construction, Inc.; and,
Holi Jeanne Worthington, an individual and Officer of
Worthington Construction
CSLB Number: 714836
RMV Construction, Inc., A California Corporation; and
Robert
Michael Vasil II a.k.a. Robert Michael Vasil a.k.a.

Mike Vasil, an Individual and CEO/RMO President of
RMV
Construction, Inc.

CSLB Number: 892389
4/1/2017 through 8/18/2018
Decision LB 5266 
Gewargis Youkhanis Narso, an individual dba
GEHVAC and Technologies, a sole proprietorship,
And GEHVAC Co., a sole proprietorship
CSLB Number: 899312 and 1013848
2/1/2017 through 1/31/2020
Decision 40-48480-516 
Joseph Brothers Enterprise, Inc.; Ken Joseph Individually and as CEO
CSLB Number: 849169
4/3/2018 through 10/3/2019
Decision SC 6390 
Dave Cook Concrete Construction, Inc., and David
William Cook
34231 Camino Capistrano #102
Capistrano Beach, CA 92624-1189
CSLB Number: 461897
3/1/2017 through 2/29/2020
Decision LB 6207 
Bannaoun Engineers Constructors Corporation; Omar
Maloof, An Individual
P.O. Box 16599
Beverly Hills, CA 90209-2599
05/12/17 through 05/11/20
Decision SC 5517 
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 10 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 4/12
CSLB Number: 827829
Evans Roofing Co., Inc.
2020 South Yale Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
CSLB Number: 610549
10/31/16 through 10/30/19
Decision LB 6270 
Guillermo Ibaibarriaga dba Sierra Nevada Stucco and
2K Roofing
Sierra Nevada Stucco
P.O. Box 8472
Reno, NV 89502
CSLB Number: 915812
2K Roofing
820 Kuenzli Street
Reno, NV 89502
CSLB Number: 954551
05/14/17 through 05/13/20
Decision SC 6037 
Del Norte Construction, And Trinidad Manuel Canales,
an Individual
PO Box 5101
Oxnard, CA 93030
5020 Wooley Rd.

Oxnard, CA 93030
CSLB Number: #945723
6/01/16 through 5/31/17
Decision LB 5533 
Diversified Building & Electric Company, Inc.
409 Tennant Station
Morgan Hill, CA 95037
Denis Andrew Maris, Individually and Doing Business as
Diversified Electric Company
2/15/16 through 8/15/17
Decision SC 5714 
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 11 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 5/12
CSLB Number: #765312
Fast Demolition, Inc.
601-C East Palomar Street #123
Chula Vista, CA 91911
CSLB Number: #792729
Rogelio Medina Vazquez., an individual and in his
capacity as Responsible Managing Officer of FAST
DEMOLITION, INC.
4/1/44 through 3/31/47
Decision LB5742 
4/1/41 through 3/31/44
Decision LB5665 
4/1/36 through 3/31/39
Decision LB5740 
4/1/33 through 3/31/37
Decision LB5651 
4/1/33 through 3/31/37
Decision LB5739 
4/1/24 through 3/31/27
Decision LB5741 
4/1/30 through 3/31/33
Decision LB5743 
4/1/27 through 3/31/30
Decision LB5666 
4/1/21 through 3/31/24
Decision LB5667 
4/1/18 through 3/31/21
Decision LB5668 
4/01/15 through 3/31/18
Decision LB5345 
Amerivet Plumbing, Inc.; Walter Edward Jacob
Kuhlmann III, Individually And dba Amerivet Plumbing
Services
CSLB Number: #969048 and #919761
8/6/15 through 8/5/18
Decision SC 5756 
Ultimate Inc., And, Enrique Vera, an Individual
PO Box 571117
12/1/15 through 11/30/18
Decision LB 5655 & LBS659 
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 12 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 6/12
Tarzana, CA 91356-1117
CSLB Number: #949229
Travioli Construction, Inc.

PO Box 231
Visalia, CA 93274
CSLB Number: #936832
9/11/15 through 3/10/17
Decision SC 5800 
Integrity Sheet Metal, Inc.
319 McArthur Way
Upland, CA 91786
CSLB #726770
William Ben Hicks, an individual;
Margaret Mary Hicks, an individual
2/01/15 through 1/31/18
Decision LB 5596 
L A Builders, Inc., a California Corporation
15635 Saticoy Street, #H
Van Nuys, CA 91406
CSLB #748591
Alon Gamliel, an individual
2/01/15 through 1/31/18
Decision LB5 171 
USA Wall Systems, Inc.
8309 Sunshine Lane
Riverside, CA 92508
CSLB #929610
Edward Eugene Brammer, an individual
and in his capacity as President/CEO/RMO
4/01/15 through 3/31/18
Decision LB 5323 
Daughter Construction
formerly dba Hy Carpentry Construction
15407 Thornlake Avenue
Norwalk, CA 90650
CSLB #979297
Sharon Jin Yoo, an individual;
4/01/15 through 3/31/18
Decision LB 5466, LB5467, LB5468
& LB5520 
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 13 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 7/12
Dae Hyun Yoo, an individual
and in his capacity as manager/supervisor for Sharon Jin Yoo and in his capacity as General Partner for HY
Construction, a General Partnership.

RDA Construction, Inc.
1692 W. Bullard Ave.,
Fresno, CA 93711
CSLB# 383306
12/15/14 through 12/14/16
Decision 40-40508-522 & 44-
40509-522 
Titan Electrical Construction, Inc.

Lucas Oliver Stickney, an individual
Jamie Noel Furr, an individual
630 Natoma Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
CSLB# 919516
11/3/14 through 11/2/17
Decision SC 5539 
Ramos Painting
Carlos Ray Ramos, an individual
P.O. Box 3871
Paso Robles, CA 93447
CSLB# 753575
11/3/14 through 11/2/15
Decision SC 5518 
Dick Emard Electric.
dba Emard Electric Luke Richard Emard, an individual
and RMO
5930 Key Court, Suite A
Loomis, CA 95650
CSLB# 794007
11/3/14 thorough 11/2/17
Decision SC 5521 
Nixon Electric
Gordon Fulton Nixon, an individual
5624 Faust Ave.

Woodland Hills, CA 91367
CSLB# 796802
8/1/14 through 7/31/17
Decision LB 4495 
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 14 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 8/12
Neris General Contractors, a California Corporation
Efren Neri, an individual
Servando Neri, an individual
Rebeca Neri, an individual
Luis Abelardo Castro, an individual
6087 California Ave.

Long Beach, CA 90805
CSLB# 797967
2/28/14 through 2/27/17
Decision LB 4511, LB4512 &
LB4521 
Southland Construction
Reza Mohammedi, an individual
3943 Irvine Blvd., #405, Irvine, CA 92602
CSLB# 663784 (expired)
10/14/14 through 10/13/17
Decision SAC 5492 
National Drywall Corporation,
A Dissolved California Corporation
603 S. Milliken Avenue, Suite F
Ontario, CA 91761
CSLB #834335
Miguel Contreras, an Individual and
Responsible Managing Officer/CEO/President
Dora Maria Contreras, an Individual and
Agent/Officer of the Corporation
8/4/14 through 8/3/17
Decision SAC 5506 
Tadros & Youssef Construction, Inc.

Kamel Shaker Tadros & Makram Youssef Youssef,
Individually
1221 E 8th Street, Unit A, Upland, CA 91786
CSLB# 698182 (expired)
5/10/14 through 5/9/17
Decision SAC 5308 
Serenity Fire Protection
417 S. Associated Road, Brea, CA 92821
CSLB# 902927
5/1/14 through 4/30/17
Decision LB 4202 
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 15 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 9/12
Don Kelly Construction , Inc.

Don Kelly, Individual and Lisa Kelly, Individual
171 Northview Ridge Lane, P.O. Box 10760, Bozeman, MT
59719
3/25/14 through 3/24/17
Decision LB 4484 
Aldan, Inc.

P.O. Box 9428, Brea, CA 92822
CSLB #949229
2/28/14 through 2/27/17
Decision LB5175 
Russell/Thompson, Inc.

James Jean Russell & Valery Alena Thompson,
Individually
4684 Oak Glen Dr., Redding, CA 96001
CSLB# 915036 (revoked)
10/31/13 through 10/31/16
Decision SC 5309 
Ayodejia A. Ogundare, Individual
Dba Pacific Engineering Company
6310 Stewart Way, Bakersfield, CA 93308
CLSB#710322
5/15/2013 through 5/15/2014
Decision SAC 1039 
Wallcrete Industries, Inc.; Garit David
Wallace and Amber Anderson, Individuals
400 Kansas, Redlands, CA 92373
CSLB#834220
7/29/12 through 7/28/15
Decision SAC 5175 
FEI Enterprises, Inc
Gabriel Fedida, Individual
5749 Venice Blvd., Los Angeles,  CA 90019
CSLB#659252
6/14/12 through 6/13/15
Decision SC 5198 
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 16 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 10/12
Jeffrey Alan Mott and Michelle Mott, individuals
Dda Integrity Landscape
3756 Independence Avenue
Sanger, CA 93637
CSLB#774222
3/29/12 through 3/28/15
Decision SC 5160 
Jensen Drywall & Stucco
Jeffrey E. Jensen
3714 Lynda Place
National City, CA 91950-8121
CSB # 664168 Exp. 2/18/11 (expired)
3/31/11 through 3/30/13
Decision SC 5095 
All West Construction, Inc.

Donald Kent Russell
495 N. Marks Ave.

Fresno, CA 93706
CSB # 592321 Exp. 4/3/12 (suspended)
3/31/11 through 3/30/13
Decision se 5013 
Country Builders, Inc.

Weldon Offill, individually
5915 Graham Ct.

Livermore, CA 94550
CSB # 699574 Exp. 11/30/12 (active)
3/1/11 through 2/28/14
Decision SC 5053 
Addendum SC 5053 
Sutter Foam & Coating, Inc.
909 A. George Washington
Yuba City, CA 95993
CSB # 732014 Exp. 1/31/09 (inactive)
David Alvin Trexler, an individual
909 A. George Washington
Yuba City, CA 95993
Kenneth A. Trexler, an individual
2603 Lago Lane
Marysville, CA 95901
7/1/10 through 6/30/13
Decision SAC 5012 
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 17 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 11/12
Soo Dong Kim, an individual,
dba Soo Kim Electric Company
16224 Ridgeview Lane
La Mirada, CA 90638
CSB # 568103 Exp. 8/1/09 (inactive)
Hyo Nam Jung, an individual,
dba Lucid Electric
18621 Well Street
Rowland Heights, CA 91748
CSB # 914692 Exp. 4/3/10
4/19/10 through 4/18/13
Decision SAC 1064 
Southwest Grading,
dba Southwest Grading Services, Inc.,
22031 Waite Street
Wildomar, CA  92595
David Walter Cholewinski, an individual
22031 Waite Street
Wildomar, A 92595
29970 Technology Drive, Ste. 205
Murrieta, CA  92563
CSB #840416  Exp. 6/30/10
3/18/10 through 3/17/13
Decision SAC 1058 
S.J. Cimino Electric, Inc., a California corporation,
3267 Dutton Ave.

Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Salvatore Joseph Cimino, RMO, CEO and President of
S.J. Cimino Electric, Inc. and sole owner of S.J. Cimino Electric, an individual
5825 Heights Rd.

Santa Rosa, CA 95401
CSB #343802 Exp. 2/28/10
CSB #294141 Exp. 9/30/13 (inactive)
10/15/09 through 10/14/12
Decision SAC 1052 
Cedar Development Corporation
Serghon Gabriel Afram, individually
12477 Feather Dr
8/5/09 through 8/4/12
Decision SAC 1042 
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 18 of 22

10/12/23, 10:34 AM Public Works
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/debar.html 12/12
Mira Loma, CA 91752
CSB # 839898 Exp. 6/30/10 (suspended)
All Floors Commercial and Residential Flooring, Inc.

Salvador Elias Perea, individually
750 E. McGlincy Lane, #103
Campbell, CA 95008
CSB #430969 Exp. 7/31/09
5/14/09 through 5/13/12
Decision SAC 1040 
1-AMD Construction, Inc.

Alberto Mordoki, individually
Mirella Mordoki, individually
5300 Beach Blvd., Suite 110-416
Buena Park, CA 90621
CSB #787533, revoked
3/16/09 through 3/15/12
Decision SAC1037 
Updated: August 2023
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 19 of 22

10/12/23, 10:36 AM SAM.gov | Search
https://sam.gov/search/?index=ex&sort=-relevance&page=1&pageSize=25&sfm%5BsimpleSearch%5D%5BkeywordRadio%5D=EXACT&sfm%5Bsim… 1/3 An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
You have 2 new alerts
Show / Hide Alerts
Search
All Words
e.g. 1606N020Q02
Select Domain
Entity Information
All Entity Information
Entities
Disaster Response Registry
Responsibility / Qualification
Exclusions
Filter By
Keyword Search
For more information on how to use our keyword search, visit our help guide Simple Search Search Editor
Any Words
All Words
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 20 of 22

10/12/23, 10:36 AM SAM.gov | Search
https://sam.gov/search/?index=ex&sort=-relevance&page=1&pageSize=25&sfm%5BsimpleSearch%5D%5BkeywordRadio%5D=EXACT&sfm%5Bsim… 2/3 Classification
Excluded Individual
Excluded Entity
Federal Organizations
Exclusion Type
Exclusion Program
Location
Dates
Exact Phrase
e.g. 123456789, Smith Corp
"ROBERT HENDERSON"
"CARE FOR THE CHILDREN"
Reset
No matches found
We couldn't find a match for your search criteria.

Please try another search or go back to previous results.

Go Back
Our Website
Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 21 of 22

10/12/23, 10:36 AM SAM.gov | Search
https://sam.gov/search/?index=ex&sort=-relevance&page=1&pageSize=25&sfm%5BsimpleSearch%5D%5BkeywordRadio%5D=EXACT&sfm%5Bsim… 3/3 Our Partners
Policies
Customer Service
General Services Administration
This is a U.S. General Services Administration
Federal Government computer system that is "FOR
OFFICIAL USE ONLY." This system is subject to
monitoring. Individuals found performing
unauthorized activities are subject to disciplinary
action including criminal prosecution.

Bid Analysis, City of Maywood, Citywide Curb Numbering, City Project ID: 6117 Document Control Page 22 of 22

Attachment No. 1 –
Agreement with Care For The Children
DBA CFTC Painting

1 2710327

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
[INFORMALLY BID - $200,000 OR LESS]
THIS CONTRACT (“Contract”) is made and entered into this 25th day of October 2023, by and between the City of Maywood, a municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting, a California corporation, (hereinafter the "Contractor").

R E C I T A L S

1. The Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (Public Contract Code Section 22000, et seq.) (the "Act") provides general law cities with an alternative method for the bidding of public works projects.

2. The City Council, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 1902 adopted the alternative informal bidding procedures for the bidding of public works projects, as set forth in the Act.

3. The Act and Maywood Municipal Code Section 3-7.04 authorize the informal bidding of public works projects that have a cost of $200,000 or less.

4. The City has, in accordance with Maywood Municipal Code Section 3-7.04, invited the submission of informal bids for the following work: City Wide Curb Numbering Project (the "Project").

5. The Contractor is the lowest responsible bidder for performance of the work and completion of the Project.

6. The City and Contractor enter this Contract in order to set forth terms and conditions applicable to Contractor’s work and completion of the Project.

A G R E E M E N T
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties agree as follows:

1. Scope of Work. Contractor shall perform the work and complete the Project in accordance with this Contract. Contractor shall furnish all materials and perform all work required for the construction and/or completion of the Project (“Work”). The agreement between the City and the Contractor consists of this Contract and all of the following, each of which is incorporated by reference herein (“Contract Documents”):
a. Notice Inviting Informal Bids, and Instructions to Bidders, if any. b. Scope of Work, Exhibit “A” hereto, including any plans for the Project. c. General Specifications for the Project (if any).
d. Special Provisions for the Project (if any).

2 2710327
e. Standard Specifications (Greenbook).
f. Bid signed by Contractor.

2. Standard Specifications. Standard Specifications for City projects are those contained in the most recent edition of the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction" (the "Greenbook"). Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the Standard Specifications shall control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract (except as expressly amended by the Scope of Work/Plans for the Project), any General Specifications for the Project, any Special Provisions for the Project, any technical specifications for the Project, and any other contract documents referenced herein.

3. Compensation. City shall pay Contractor the total, all-inclusive, NOT-TO-EXCEED amount of Sixty Eight Thousand Dollars ($68,000) to complete the Project in compliance with this Contract. This amount shall cover all expenses for labor, materials, and any and all other costs incurred by Contractor to satisfactorily construct and/complete the Project. Unless the Contract Time is thirty (30) days or less, or agreed upon otherwise by the parties, Contractor shall submit detailed, monthly invoices for work actually performed. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 9203, the City will retain five percent (5%) of each invoice amount until Project acceptance.

4. Completion Date. The construction of the Project shall commence upon Contractor being given a written notice to proceed, and, unless sooner terminated as provided herein, shall be completed in 30 working days after issuance of Notice to Proceed (“Contract Time”). Contractor agrees that if such Work is not completed within the Contract Time and/or pursuant to any such completion schedule, construction schedule or Project milestones developed pursuant to provisions of the Contract, it is understood, acknowledged and agreed that City will suffer damage. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor shall pay to City as fixed and liquidated damages the sum of Five Hundred Dollars ($500) per day for each and every calendar day of delay beyond the Contract Time or beyond any completion schedule, construction schedule or Project milestones established pursuant to the Contract.

5. Payment and Performance Bonds; Warranty. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the bid documents, prior to commencing work, Contractor shall provide a payment bond and performance bond, each in an amount equal to 100% of the Contract price. The bond forms required to be executed are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The performance bond shall remain in force until the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion or written acceptance of the Work and the end of the one (1) year warranty period.

As required by the Standard Specifications, the Work shall be warranted by the Contractor against defective materials and workmanship for a period of one (1) year. For the purposes of the calculation of the start of the warranty period, the Work shall be deemed to be completed upon the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion or written acceptance of the Work by the City. Should any of the materials installed or Work performed prove defective or should the any portion of the Project prove defective, due to faulty workmanship, material furnished or methods of installation, or should said item or any part thereof fail to operate properly due to any of the above causes during the warranty period, the Contractor shall make all required repairs and/or replacements within thirty (30) days after written notice by the City. In the event repairs are not made within thirty (30) days, then as an alternative to utilizing the required performance bond, the City may elect to perform all necessary corrective work, repairs and/or

3 2710327
replacements, at Contractor’s expense. In such event, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for its expenses incurred in correcting the defective Work. Additionally, the Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from claims of any kind arising from damage, injury or death due to such defects.

6. Licenses and DIR Registration. At all times during the term of this Contract, Contractor shall possess a valid and current Class -32 OR Class C-33 OR Class C-61/D-42 California Contractor's License to perform the Work. Contractor hereby certifies that it holds the required license(s), License No. 1040225. Contractor’s DIR Registration number is 1000420383.

7. Subcontracting. Contractor may subcontract any portion of the work required by this Contract to other persons or firms provided the bid documents do not prohibit subcontracting, and Contractor submitted with its bid a list of all subcontractors who will perform work in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent (1%) of the Contractor’s total bid, in compliance with the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act, California Public Contract Code § 4100, et seq.

Only such listed subcontractors may perform on this Project, unless they are exempt from listing under Section 4100, et seq.

8. Non-Assignability. Neither this Contract nor any rights, title, interest, duties or obligations under this Contract may be assigned, transferred, conveyed or otherwise disposed of by Contractor without the prior written consent of City.

9. Administration. This Contract will be administered by the Public Works Department.

The Director of Public Works/City Engineer or his or her designee shall be considered the Project Administrator and shall have the authority to act for the City under this Contract.

10. Indemnification. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City, the City Council, the City's officers, employees, agents, volunteers, and representatives with respect to any and all claims, suits, actions, stop notices, liabilities and/or damages, including related expenses, payment of reasonable attorney's fees and costs, based on, arising out of, or in any way related to the Work undertaken by Contractor pursuant to this Contract. This indemnification requirement is subject to the limitation set forth in California Civil Code Section 2782.

11. Liability Insurance. Without limiting Contractor's indemnification of City, as described in paragraph 10, Contractor shall obtain, provide and maintain, at its own expense, during the term of this Contract, a policy or policies of insurance, satisfactory to the City, from insurance carriers admitted to do business in the State of California, which contain the coverage described below.
a. The Contractor shall at all times during the term of the Contract carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect a commercial general liability insurance policy (CGL) or policies with the minimum limits of one million dollars ($2,000,000) for each occurrence and two million dollars ($3,000,000) general aggregate for bodily injury, death, loss or property damage for products or completed operations and any and all other activities undertaken by Contractor in the performance of this Contract. Said policy or policies shall be issued by an insurer admitted to do business in

4 2710327
the State and rated in A.M. Best’s Insurance Guide with a rating of A:VII or better.

If required by the bid solicitation documents, Contractor shall at all times during the term of this Contract, carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect a policy or policies of professional liability insurance with a minimum limit of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and aggregate for errors and/or omissions of Contractor in the performance of this Contract. Said policy or policies shall be issued by an insurer admitted to do business in the State and rated in Best's Insurance Guide with a rating of A:VII or better.

If a “claims made” policy is provided, such policy shall be endorsed to provide an extended reporting period of not less than three (3) years.

Contractor shall at all times during the term of this Contract obtain, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, a policy or policies of Automobile Liability Insurance (any auto), with minimum limits of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate for bodily injuries or death of any person and $500,000 for property damage arising from any incident. Said policy or policies shall be issued by an insurer admitted to do business in the State and rated in Best's Insurance Guide with a rating of A:VII or better.
b. Certificates of Insurance and original endorsements shall be provided by Contractor as evidence of the above-indicated policies. c. The City of Maywood, the City Council, and the City's officers, employees, volunteers, agents and representatives shall be named as additional insureds under the CGL and auto policies.
d. All policies of insurance shall provide that thirty (30) days’ prior written notice of cancellation shall be given to the City in the event of cancellation and/or reduction in coverage of any nature.
e. The CGL, auto and workers compensation policies of insurance shall be endorsed to waive all rights of subrogation. Contractors waives all rights of subrogation.
f. The required policies of insurance shall not have a deductible exceeding $10,000 unless such amount is approved in writing by the City’s risk manager.
g. The required policies of insurance shall otherwise be in such form and contain such limits as otherwise required by the City’s risk manager.

12. Workers' Compensation Insurance. Contractor acknowledges the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of the Labor Code, and Contractor certifies that it will comply with these provisions before commencing

5 2710327
performance of work under this Contract. The Contractor shall sign a Workers' Compensation Insurance Certificate, using the form attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, and submit the signed Certificate to the City prior to commencing work under this Contract.

13. California Labor Code.
a. This Contract calls for work to be performed constituting public works.

Contractor and all subcontractors shall pay the general prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined and as published by the State Director of the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Article 2 of Chapter 1 of Part 7, of Division 2 of the California Labor Code, including, but not limited to, Sections 1770, 1771, 1773, 1773.2 and 1774. In accordance with Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, no contractor or subcontractor shall be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions for bid purposes only under Labor Code Section 1771.1(a)]
b. This is a public work and requires the payment of prevailing wages for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done under the contract by Contractor or by any subcontractor pursuant to Section 1771 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk or may be obtained at http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, not more than $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of this Agreement. c. Contractors and subcontractors who are ineligible to bid for work on, or be awarded, a public works project pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1777.1 and 1777.7 are prohibited from bidding on, being awarded, or performing work as a subcontractor, on this Project pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 6109.
d. Contractor's attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code. Contractor shall comply with the provisions in these Sections. The statutory provisions for penalties for failure to comply with the State's wage and hours laws will be enforced.
e. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, the Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the California Department of Industrial Relations.

6 2710327
f. Each Contractor and subcontractor shall furnish the records specified in Labor Code Section 1776 directly to the State Labor Commissioner at least monthly in the format prescribed by the State Labor Commissioner.
g. Sections 1774 and 1775 require the Contractor and all subcontractors to pay not less than the prevailing wage rates to all workmen employed in the execution of the Contract and specify forfeitures and penalties for failure to do so. The minimum wages to be paid are those determined by the State Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Section 1776 requires the Contractor and all subcontractors to keep accurate payroll records, specifies the contents thereof, their inspection and duplication procedures and certain notices required of the Contractor pertaining to their location.
h. Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code requires Contractor or subcontractor employing workers in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint Apprenticeship Committee nearest the site of the public works project, which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen to be used in the performance of the Contract. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade and if other contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, contributions, wage schedules and other requirements may be obtained from the State Director of Industrial Relations or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards. Section 1777.6 of the Labor Code provides that it shall be unlawful to refuse to accept otherwise qualified employees as registered apprentices solely on the grounds of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, or age.
i. Eight hours labor constitutes a legal day's work, as set forth in Labor Code Section 1810. The statutory provisions for penalties for failure to comply with the State's wage and hour laws will be enforced as set forth in Labor Code Section 1813.

14. Antitrust Claims. In entering into this Agreement, Contractor offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the California Business and Professions Code) arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the Contract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to Contractor without further acknowledgment by the parties.

15. Trenching and Excavations. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7104, if the Project involves trenching more than four (4) feet deep, Contractor shall promptly and before the following conditions are disturbed notify the City in writing of any:
a. Material that Contractor believes may be material that is hazardous waste, as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 25117, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law; and/or b. Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated; and/or

7 2710327
c. Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Contract.
d. As required by Labor Code Section 6705 and in addition thereto, whenever work under the Contract that involves an estimated expenditure in excess of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for the excavation of any trench or trenches five (5) feet or more in depth, Contractor shall submit for acceptance by City in advance of excavation, a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during the excavation, of such trench or trenches. If such plan varies from the shoring system standards established by the Construction Safety Orders of the Division of Industrial Safety, the plan shall be prepared by a registered civil or structural engineer employed by Contractor, and all costs therefor shall be included in the price of the Contract. Nothing in this provision shall be deemed to allow the use of a shoring, sloping, or other protective system less effective than that required by the Construction Safety Orders. Nothing in this provision shall be construed to impose tort liability on the City or on any City officer, agent, consultant, representative, or employee. All plans, processing and shoring costs are Contractor’s responsibility and must be included in Contractor’s bid. e. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 6707, Contractor’s bid must include separate pricing for pipeline, sewer, sewage disposal system, boring and jacking pits, or similar trenches or open excavations, which are five feet or deeper, including pricing for adequate sheeting, shoring, and bracing, or equivalent method, for the protection of life or limb, which shall conform to Construction Safety Orders of the Division of Industrial Safety.

16. Location of Existing Elements. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 4216 to 4216.9, the methods used and costs involved to locate existing elements, points of connection and all construction methods are Contractor’s sole responsibility. Accuracy of information furnished, as to existing conditions, is not guaranteed. Contractor, at its sole expense, must make all investigations necessary to determine locations of existing elements, which may include, without limitation, contacting U.S.A. alert and other private underground locating firm(s), and/or utilizing potholes, specialized locating equipment and/or hand trenching.

17. Third Party Claims. Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 9201, the City has full authority to compromise or otherwise settle any claim relating to this Contract at any time. The City shall timely notify Contractor of the receipt of any third-party claim relating to the Contract.

The City shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs incurred in providing the notification required by Public Contract Code Section 9201(b).

18. Non-Collusion. Contractor hereby certifies that this bid is genuine and not a sham or collusive, or made in the interest or on behalf of any person or business not herein named.

Contractor further certifies that Contractor has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to furnish a sham bid, or any other person or business to refrain from bidding, and Contractor has not in any manner sought by collusion to secure itself an advantage over any other bidder. Contractor also affirms that it has signed and submitted with its bid to the City a Noncollusion Declaration as required by Public Contract Code Section 7106.

8 2710327

19. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees not to accept any employment or representation during the term of this Contract or within twelve (12) months after completion of the work under this Contract which is or may likely make Contractor “financially interested,” as provided in Government Code Section 1090 and 87100, in any decisions made by City on any matter in connection with which Contractor has been retained pursuant to this Contract.

20. Audit. The City or its representative shall have the option of inspecting and/or auditing all records and other written materials used by Contractor in preparing its billings to the City as a condition precedent to any payment to Contractor. Contractor will promptly furnish documents requested by the City. Additionally, pursuant to Government Code Section 8546.7, if this Contract involves the expenditure of public funds in excess of ten thousand dollars ($10,000), Contractor shall be subject to State Auditor examination and audit at the request of the City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under this Contract.

21. Substitute Security. In accordance with California Public Contract Code Section 22300, City will permit the substitution of securities for any monies withheld by City to ensure performance under the Contract. At the request and expense of Contractor, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with City, or with a state or federally chartered bank in California as the escrow agent, and thereafter City shall then pay such monies to Contractor as they come due. Upon satisfactory completion of the Contract, the securities shall be returned to Contractor. For purposes of this Section and Section 22300 of the Public Contract Code, the term “satisfactory completion of the contract” shall mean the time City has issued written final acceptance of the Work and filed a Notice of Completion as required by law and provisions of this Contract. Contractor shall be the beneficial owner of any securities substituted for monies withheld and shall receive any interest thereon. The escrow agreement used for the purposes of this Section shall be in the form provided by City.

22. Claims Dispute Resolution. In the event of any dispute or controversy with the City over any matter whatsoever, the Contractor shall not cause any delay or cessation in or of Work, but shall proceed with the performance of the Work in dispute. The Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided that pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. The Disputed Work will be categorized as an “unresolved dispute” and payment, if any, shall be as later determined by agreement or a court of law. The Contractor shall keep accurate, detailed records of all Disputed Work, claims and other disputed matters.

All claims arising out of or related to the Contract documents or this Project, and the consideration and payment of such claims, are subject to the Government Claims Act (Government Code Section 810, et seq.) with regard to filing claims. All such claims are also subject to Public Contract Code Section 9204 and Public Contract Code Section 20104, et seq. (Article 1.5), where applicable. This Contract hereby incorporates those provisions as though fully set forth herein. Thus, the Contractor or any Subcontractor must file a claim in accordance with the Government Claims Act as a prerequisite to filing a construction claim in compliance with Section 9204 and Article 1.5 (if applicable), and must then adhere to Section 9204 and Article 1.5 (as applicable), pursuant to the definition of “claim” as individually defined therein.

23. Termination. In the event that either party fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement at the time and in the manner required, that party shall be deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within a period of five

9 2710327
(5) calendar days after receipt of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, the non-defaulting party may terminate the Agreement forthwith by giving to the defaulting party written notice thereof. In the event that the default cannot be cured within five (5) days, no such failure will be deemed to exist if the defaulting party has given the non-defaulting party adequate assurance of due performance and commenced to cure such default within such period, such cure efforts are prosecuted to completion with reasonable diligence, and in any event are completed with thirty (30) days.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, City shall have the right, at its sole discretion and without cause, to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving seven (7) calendar days prior written notice to Contractor. In the event of termination under this Section, and provided Contractor is not in breach, City shall pay Contractor for Work satisfactorily performed and costs incurred in the performance of such Services up to the effective date of termination for which Contractor has not previously been paid.

24. Notices. All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing, to City by Contractor and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally, or on the third business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid, first-class mail, addressed as hereinafter provided. All notices, demands, requests or approvals from Contractor to City shall be addressed as follows:

To:

City of Maywood
4319 E. Slauson Avenue
Maywood, California 90270
To Contractor:

Care For The Children dba CFTC Painting
PO Box 3144
Whittier, CA 90605

25. Nondiscrimination by Contractor. Contractor represents and agrees that Contractor, its affiliates, subsidiaries, or holding companies do not and will not discriminate against any subcontractor, consultant, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, sex, handicap, or national origin. Such nondiscrimination shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfers, recruitment, recruitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

26. Integration. This Contract supersedes any and all agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the construction of the Project by Contractor for City and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the construction of the Project. Each party to this Contract acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made with regard to the construction of the Project by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement, statement, or promise regarding work not contained in this Contract shall be valid or binding. Any modification or amendment of this Contract

10 2710327
will be effective only if it is in writing and signed by the parties to this Contract. Any changes to the work required by this Contract will be by change order signed by the parties. The provisions of this Contract shall govern over any conflicting provisions of any document, specification, attachment and/or exhibit incorporated herein.

27. Governing Law and Venue. This Contract will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California without reference to change of venue laws.

Any legal action in which enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Contract is requested, or in which it is alleged that a breach of this Contract has taken place, shall be filed and prosecuted in the County of Orange, California.

28. Successors and Assigns. The terms and conditions of this Contract shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties to this Contract.

29. Exhibits. The exhibits, documents, plans, specifications, and attachments referenced in this Contract, including those attached hereto, are incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full in this Contract.

28. Authority to Sign. The person or persons executing this Contract on behalf of the Contractor warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Contract on behalf of the Contractor and have the authority to bind Contractor to the provisions of this Contract.
[Signature page follows.]

11 2710327
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract as of the date first above written.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Date:

By:

Name:

Title:

CITY OF MAYWOOD,
a municipal corporation
Date:

By:

Name:

Title:

ATTEST:

Date:

By:

Name:

Title:

CONTRACTOR:
___________________________,
a
By:

Name:

Title:

Date:

By:

Name:

Title:

Date:
[Signatures of contractor must be
notarized. Obtain two corporate
signatures if contractor is a
corporation.]

12 2710327

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF WORK

13 2710327
Bond No. __________

PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that:

WHEREAS the City of Maywood (“City”), has awarded to
(“Principal”)
(Name and address of Contractor)
a contract (the “Contract”) for the Work described as follows:
(Project name)
WHEREAS, Principal is required under the terms of the Contract to furnish a Bond for the faithful performance of the Contract.

NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal, and
,
(Name and address of Surety)
(“Surety”) a duly admitted surety insurer under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City in the penal sum of Dollars ($ ), this amount being not less than the
total Contract Price, in lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT, if the hereby bounded Principal, his, her or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions, provisions, and warranties in the Contract and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on the Principal’s part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. Surety hereby waives any statute of limitations as it applies to an action on this Bond.

The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract or of the Work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations under this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the Work or to the specifications. Surety hereby waives the provisions of California

14 2710327
Civil Code Sections 2845 and 2849. The City is the principal beneficiary of this Bond and has all rights of a party hereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two (2) identical counterparts of this instrument, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original hereof, have been duly executed by Principal and Surety, on the date set forth below, the name of each corporate party being hereto affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative(s) pursuant to authority of its governing body.

Dated:
“Principal”
By:

Its
By:

Its
(Seal)
“Surety”
By:

Its
By:

Its
(Seal)
Note: This Bond must be executed in duplicate and dated, all signatures must be notarized, and evidence of the authority of any person signing as attorney-in-fact must be attached. DATE OF BOND MUST NOT BE BEFORE DATE OF CONTRACT. Surety companies executing Bonds must appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the State where the project is located.

Bond No. __________

15 2710327

PAYMENT BOND
(LABOR AND MATERIALS)
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that:

WHEREAS the City of Maywood (“City”), State of California, has awarded to (“Principal”)
(Name and address of Contractor)
a contract (the “Contract”) for the Work described as follows:
(Project name)
WHEREAS, under the terms of the Contract, the Principal is required before entering upon the performance of the Work, to file a good and sufficient payment Bond with the City to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Principal, and
(Name and address of Surety)
(“Surety”) a duly admitted surety insurer under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material suppliers, and other persons employed in the performance of the Contract and referred to in Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code in the penal sum of Dollars ($ ), for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to this Work or labor, that the Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this Bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing this obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.

It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this Bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 3 (commencing with Section 9000) of Part 6 of Division 4 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this Bond.

Upon expiration of the time within which the California Labor Commissioner may serve a civil wage and penalty assessment against the principal, any of its subcontractors, or both the principal and its subcontractors pursuant to Labor Code Section 1741, and upon expiration of the time within which a joint labor management committee may commence an action against the principal, any of its subcontractors, or both the principal and its subcontractors pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.2, if the condition of this Bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

16 2710327
The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration, or addition.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, two (2) identical counterparts of this instrument, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original hereof, have been duly executed by Principal and Surety, on the date set forth below, the name of each corporate party being hereto affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative(s) pursuant to authority of its governing body.

Dated:
“Principal”
By:

Its
By:

Its
(Seal)
“Surety”
By:

Its
By:

Its
(Seal)
Note: This Bond must be executed in duplicate and dated, all signatures must be notarized, and evidence of the authority of any person signing as attorney-in-fact must be attached. DATE OF BOND MUST NOT BE BEFORE DATE OF CONTRACT. Surety companies executing Bonds must appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the State where the project is located.

17 2710327
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1861, each contractor to whom a public works contract has been awarded shall sign the following certificate and shall submit same to the City prior to performing any work on the contract:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of work of this contract.”
_____________________________
Contractor
By
____________________________
Print Name
_____________________________
_____________________________
Signature
_____________________________
Title
_____________________________
Date
Section 3700 of the State Labor Code reads as follows:
“Every employer except the State shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:
(a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation in one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this state. (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to selfinsure, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his employee.”

AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF MAYWOOD
AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.

DATE: October 25, 2023
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JENNIFER VASQUEZ, CITY MANAGER
BY: MOHAMMAD MOSTAHKAMI, PE
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF MAYWOOD ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION BIKE

AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN
RECOMMENDATION:

It is staff's recommendation that the City Council:

1. Receive and File a Presentation on the City’s Active Transportation Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan by KOA, the City’s Project Consultant; and

2. Approve the Maywood Active Transportation Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan.

BACKGROUND:

The Active Transportation Program was created by Senate Bill 99 (Chapter 359, Statutes of 2013) and by Assembly Bill 101 (Chapter 354, Statutes of 2013) to fund projects that increase and promote bicycle and pedestrian trips.

In September 2020, the City submitted a grant application to the State to be considered for the ATP, Cycle 5. The project awarded was for the development of Active Transportation Plan (ATP), which will serve as a guide for the implementation of future active transportation projects and programs.

In March 2021, the State recommended projects for approval, which included the City of Maywood’s application.

In February 2022, the City received the approved allocation letter authorizing the City to proceed with the project.

The City will receive $263,000 from the State for the project with no local match required.

The purpose of this project is to develop an ATP that provides a clear and comprehensive framework for safer, more convenient non-motorized transportation options throughout the City. The plan identified and created a methodology to improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity and safety by expanding existing bicycle networks; improve pedestrian circulation; reduce vehicle trips; create complete streets; prioritize access to transit; all towards building a healthy and livable community.

Additionally, the plan will improve connectivity of the city’s bicycle network to the region’s network. Development of the ATP will be in compliance with the adopted Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) and Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG).

The objective of the ATP is to help:

1. Increase active transportation network connectivity throughout the City of Maywood

2. Facilitate mobility throughout the City

3. Provide safer, more comfortable walking and bicycling facilities to access work, schools, and recreation opportunities

4. Promote physical activity to improve health

5. Reduce emissions of greenhouse gases related to transportation On May 25, 2022, staff issued Request for Proposals to prepare an ATP for the City and on August 10, 2023, the City approved a professional services agreement with KOA Corporation (KOA) for the preparation of the City’s ATP.

DISCUSSION:

The City’s ATP kicked off in August 2022. In the Fall of 2022, KOA and its team set up the "Existing Conditions" analysis, which involved documenting specific aspects of the City, including transit usage, bicycle facilities, street conditions, and socio-economic conditions. This culminated in an Existing Conditions report.

Starting in late Fall/early Winter 2022/2023, KOA and its public engagement sub-consultants, Estolano Advisors and People for Mobility Justice, kicked-off engagement activities at the City’s Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony in December 2022 at Maywood City Hall. During this event, the consultant team asked Maywood residents about the biggest issues affecting transportation safety and accessibility throughout the city.

Ongoing engagement took place during a workshop/charrette at Fishburn Elementary with parents being asked about street conditions and infrastructure needs. The following notes the close to 150 residents who were engaged across all workshop events:

1. Christmas Tree Lighting Event (December 2022)

2. Fishburn Elementary School Charrette #1 (Spring 2023)

3. Back to School Night at YMCA (August 2023)

4. Mobile Food Pantry at YMCA (August 2023)

5. Fishburn Elementary School Charrette #2 (Fall 2023)
Taking this initial input into account, the KOA team prepared a Needs Assessment, noting areas of highest concern based on street safety (collisions) and what was identified by residents. Through these efforts, KOA pinpointed the areas and corridors of most need, which served as the foundation for the development of proposed treatments.

Through these efforts, the City’s ATP identified the following elements:

1. Creating approximately nine (9) miles of new bicycle facilities in the form of Class III bicycle routes throughout the City,

2. Identified eight (8) intersections as candidates for potentially new multi-way stops to facilitate bicycle mobility through Maywood’s neighborhoods (pending meeting stop sign warrants),

3. Identified eight (8) intersections along Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard that would include bicycle treatments such as detector loops, push buttons, and other elements that would facilitate traveling across major roadways,

4. Developed a comprehensive active transportation wayfinding network that will serve to brand Maywood Moves as a priority for the City,

5. Identified 16 intersections that would add Leading Pedestrian Intervals (LPIs) which would provide people walking with more time to cross major corridors like Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard,

6. Identified 24 intersections that would add crossing improvements to better demarcate locations where people will cross,

7. Identified 14 locations that would have curb extensions, thus shortening pedestrian crossing distances and reducing vehicle speeds upon entering neighborhood streets ,

8. Expand the City’s speed hump program pending meeting the City’s Speed Hump Policy guidelines,

9. Adding edgeline treatments to several streets to further reduce vehicle speeds and reduce cut-through traffic,

10. Developed non-infrastructure recommendations that would further the City’s active mobility goals through

safety and encouragement programs that promote active mobility, The City’s ATP also identified corridors and other potential projects so that the City can prioritize their implementation as they pursue funding opportunities. Attached is a copy of the City’s Active Transportation Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan for City Council consideration and approval. The estimated cost of implementation of the City’s plan is estimated at $6,936,000.

KOA is scheduled to make a presentation on the City’s Active Transportation Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan at tonight’s City Council meeting. Staff recommends that City Council, upon conclusion of the presentation, receive and file the presentation and approve the City’s Active Transportation Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney has reviewed this report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The project is funded by Active Transportation Plan Cycle 5 Grant in the amount of $263,000.00 based on reimbursement.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Maywood Active Transportation Plan - Final

2. Maywood Active Transportation Master Plan - City Counci Meeting Presentation 102523

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 1 City of Maywood
Active Transportation Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan
OCTOBER 25, 2023

4319 Slauson Ave
Maywood, CA 90270
(323)562-5700
https://www.cityofmaywood.com/
- October 2023 -

Acknowledgements
The City would like to thank all community members in the City of Maywood who contributed to the development and completion of this Active Transportation Plan.

The City would also like to express gratitude to the community partners listed below as well.

MAYWOOD CITY COUNCIL

MAYWOOD CITY STAFF

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

PRINCIPAL, FISHBURN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

DIRECTOR, SOUTHEAST RIO VISTA YMCA

COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Roberto Bustillo - Communities for a Better Environment Antonio Garcia - Fishburn Elementary School Principal
Alberto Espiricueta - East Yard Communities
William Downing - Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Andrea Aguilar - Southeast Rio Vista YMCA
Eric Maceda - Rivers for Action

CONSULTANTS
Transtech Engineers
KOA Corporation
Estolano Advisors
People for Mobility Justice
Photo Credit
Unless otherwise noted, the photographs used in this Plan were taken by KOA Corporation.

MaywoodActive Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 4

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 : PROJECT BACKGROUND 7
Executive Summary 8
Goals & Objectives 12
Project Timeline 13
CHAPTER 2 : MAYWOOD TODAY 18
Methodology 19
Planning Context 20
Land Use 23
Roadway Facilities 24
Socio-Economic Characteristics 27
Community Health Characteristics 32
Collision Analysis 34
Public Transportation 39
CHAPTER 3 : ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE TOOLBOX 43 Bicycle Improvements 44
Pedestrian Improvements 46
Roadway Improvements 47

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 5 CHAPTER 4 : WHAT DID THE COMMUNITY HAVE TO SAY? 48
Outreach Approach and Themes 49
Community Reactions to Proposed Recommendations 50
Community Outreach Workshop summaries 51
Community Advisory CommitTee (CAC) 56
CHAPTER 5 : RECOMMENDATIONS 58
Bicycle Network Recommendations 59
Bicycle Intersection Recommendations 61
Pedestrian Intersection Recommendations 64
Roadway Recommendations 67
Regional Connectivity Recommendations 71
Non-Infrastructure Recommendations 73
CHAPTER 6 : NEXT STEPS 75
Project Prioritization 76
Project Ranking 78
Cost Estimates 79
APPENDICES 80

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 6

LIST OF TABLES

1. RACE ETHNICITY AND AGE (27)

2. EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (28)

3. COMMUTING PATTERNS (30)

4. TOP EMPLOYMENT CENTERS FOR MAYWOOD COMMUTERS (31)

5. ADULT PHYSICAL HEALTH (32)

6. CHILDREN PHYSICAL HEALTH (33)

7. TOTAL COLLISIONS BY MODE AND YEAR (2017-2021) (35)

8. PRIMARY COLLISION FACTORS (2017-2021) (36)

9. PEDESTRIAN ACTIONS AT TIME OF COLLISION (2017-2021) (36)

10. NUMBER OF COLLISIONS PER DAY OF WEEK AND TIME (2017-2021) (37)

11. AVERAGE METRO BUS LINE FREQUENCY AT BUSIEST STOPS (40)

12. PROJECT PRIORITIZATION MATRIX (77)

13. PROJECT RANKINGS (78)

14. PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY BY CORRIDOR (79)

LIST OF FIGURES

1. CITY ZONING, BY PARCEL (23)

2. CITY STREET CLASIFICATIONS (25)

3. CITY DESIGNATED TRUCK ROUTES (24)

4. CITY SIGNAIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (26)

5. CITY MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME LEVELS, BY CENSUS BLOCK (29)

6. COMMUTING TO WORK VIA PUBLIC TRANSIT (30)

7. ALL COLLISOINS HEATMAP (2017-2021) (34)

8. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE COLLISIONS (2017-2021) (35)

9. ALL FATAL AND SEVERE (KSI) INJURIES (2017-2021) (38)

10. ALL METRO BUS LINE ROUTE AND STOPS (39)

11. WEEKLY METRO BUS BOARDINGS AND ALIGHTINGS (40)

12. MAYWOOD EXPRESS SHUTTLE ROUTE AND STOPS (41)

13. HUNTINGTON PARK EXPRESS ROUTE AND STOPS (42)

14. FOUR TYPES OF RIDERS (44)

15. PROPOSED BICYCLE NETWORK FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS (59)

16. PROPOSED BICYCLE INTERSECTION FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS (61)

17. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN INTERSECTION FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS (65)

18. PROPOSED ROADWAY FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS (68)

19. EXISTING CONDITIONS AT SLAUSON AVENUE & MAYWOOD AVENUE (71)

20. PROPOSED REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS AT SLAUSON AVENUE & MAYWOOD AVENUE (71)

21. EXISTING CONDITIONS AT DISTRICT BOULEVARD & ATLANTIC BOULEVARD (72)

22. PROPOSED REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS AT SLAUSON AVENUE & ATLANTIC BOULEVARD (72)

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A - LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS ANALYSIS

APPENDIX B - COMMUNITY OUTREACH MATERIALS

APPENDIX C - COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS

APPENDIX D - DETAILED PROJECT COST ESTIMATES

PROJECT BACKGROUND
CHAPTER 1

Executive Summary
Located within the Gateway Cities sub-region of Los Angeles County and 8 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, the City of Maywood has a population of approximately 25,000 residents living within 1.18 square miles, making it one of the densest cities in California. Maywood is bordered by the cities of Vernon, Huntington Park, Bell, and Commerce and is flanked by the Los Angeles River and the Long Beach Freeway (I-710) on its eastern city limit. Maywood contains seven schools, seven parks, and four entry points to the Los Angeles River Bicycle Path. Most of the city is zoned residential, with most commercial activity concentrated in Maywood’s downtown and industrial activity occurring on the eastern, northern, and western city limits.

The purpose of this project is to develop an Active Transportation Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan (ATP) that provides a clear and comprehensive framework for safer, more conve-nient non-motorized transportation options throughout the City. The plan identifies and creates a methodology to improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity and safety by expanding connections to existing regional bicycle network facilities along the Los Angeles River Bicycle Trail; improve pedestrian circu-lation; reduce vehicle trips; create complete streets; and prioritize access to transit all towards building a more healthy and livable community. Development of the ATMP will be in compliance with adopted Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) and Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG).

The objective of the ATP is to help:

1. Increase active transportation network connectivity throughout the City of Maywood

2. Facilitate mobility throughout the City

3. Provide safer, more comfortable walking and bicycling facilities to access work, schools, and recreation opportunities

4. Promote physical activity to improve health

5. Reduce emissions of greenhouse gases related to transportation The Maywood ATP kicked off in August 2022. In the Fall of 2022, KOA and its team set up the Existing Conditions analysis, which involved documenting specific aspects of the City, including transit usage, bicycle facilities, street conditions, and socio-economic conditions. This culminated in an Existing Conditions report.

Starting in late Fall/early Winter 2022/2023, KOA and its public engagement sub-consultants, Estolano Advisors (EA) and People for Mobility Justice (PMJ), kicked-off engagement activities at the City’s Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony in December 2022 at Maywood City Hall. During this event, the consultant team asked Maywood residents about the biggest issues affecting transportation safety and accessibility throughout the city. Ongoing engagement took place during a workshop/charrette at Fishburn Avenue Elementary with parents being asked about street conditions and infrastructure needs.

The following notes the close to 150 residents who were engaged across all workshop events:

1. Christmas Tree Lighting Event (December 2022)

2. Fishburn Elementary School Charrette #1 (Spring 2023)

3. Back to School Night at YMCA (August 2023)

4. Mobile Food Pantry at YMCA (August 2023)

5. Fishburn Elementary School Charrette #2 (Fall 2023)
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 8 Page 256 of 360 KOA and EA also developed a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) which met twice (January 2023 & July 2023) throughout the course of the project. CAC members were recruited based on their involvement as dedicated stakeholders in the community and provided critical feedback that informed KOA on project recommendations. The following individuals participated in the CAC:

1. Roberto Bustillo - Communities for a Better Environment

2. Antonio Garcia - Fishburn Elementary School Principal

3. Alberto Espiricueta - East Yard Communities

4. William Downing - Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD)

5. Andrea Aguilar - Southeast Rio Vista YMCA

6. Eric Maceda - Rivers for Action
After reviewing initial community feedback, the KOA team prepared a Needs Assessment, noting areas of highest concern based on street safety (collisions) and what was identified by residents. KOA identified the areas and corridors of most need, which served as the foundation for the development of proposed treatments.

Through these efforts, the Maywood ATP identified the following treatment elements. A map of the proposed bike route network, which serves as the backbone of many of the treatments listed below, can be found on the next page.

1. Creating approximately nine (9) miles of new bicycle facilities in the form of Class III bicycle routes throughout the City,

2. Identified eight (8) intersections as candidates for potentially new multi-way stops to facilitate bicycle mobility through Maywood’s neighborhoods (pending meeting stop sign warrants),

3. Identified eight (8) intersections along Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard that would include bicycle treatments such as detector loops, push buttons, and other elements that would facilitate traveling across major roadways,

4. Developed a comprehensive active transportation wayfinding network that will serve to brand Maywood Moves as a priority for the City,

5. Identified 16 intersections that would add Leading Pedestrian Intervals (LPIs) which would provide people walking with more time to cross major corridors like Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard,

6. Identified 24 intersections that would add crossing improvements to better demarcate locations where people will cross,

7. Identified 14 locations that would have curb extension, thus shortening pedestrian crossing distances and reducing vehicle speeds upon entering neighborhood streets,

8. Expand the City’s speed hump program,

9. Adding edge line treatments to several streets to further reduce vehicle speeds and reduce cut-through traffic,

10. Developed non-infrastructure recommendations that would further the City’s active mobility goals through safety and encouragement programs that promote active mobility
The Maywood ATP also identified corridors and other potential projects so that the City can prioritize their implementation as they pursue funding opportunities.

KOA also provided projected cost estimates for each corridor based on the treatment recommendations identified on each street. Corridor project prioritization was calculated and ranked according to four weighted criteria categories: Need and Equity; Safety, Community Feedback, and Network Connectivity. The following corridors were ranked the highest and would experience the greatest benefits for active transportation users if improved: A table of the projected costs by corridor can be found on page 11.

1. Slauson Avenue (Projected Grand Total: $2,630,598)

2. Pine Avenue (Projected Grand Total: $29,986)

3. Atlantic Boulevard (Projected Grand Total: $2,757,049)

4. 53rd Street (Projected Grand Total: $186,302)

5. Carmelita Avenue (Projected Grand Total: $8,035)
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 9 Page 257 of 360

PROPOSED BICYCLE NETWORK FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Maywood Destinations Bike Facility Recommendations
City Hall
Library
School
Park
Class III Bike Route Network
Local Bike Networks
City of Bell Proposed Network
City of Huntington Park
Proposed Network
Legend
Basemap
Los Angeles
River Bike Path
Los Angeles River Bike
Path Entrance
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 10 Page 258 of 360 Corridor Sub-Total Mobilization (5%) Traffic Control (10%) Design (15%) Contingency (15%) Inflation (30%) Construction
Management and
Inspection (10%)
Grand Total
Atlantic Blvd $ 1,349,180 $ 67,459 $ 134,918 $ 202,377 $ 263,090 $ 605,107 $ 134,918 $ 2,757,049 Slauson Ave $ 1,287,300 $ 64,365 $ 128,730 $ 193,095 $ 251,024 $ 577,354 $ 128,730 $ 2,630,598 52nd St $ 187,539 $ 9,377 $ 18,754 $ 28,131 $ 36,570 $ 84,111 $ 18,754 $ 383,236 58th St $ 96,552 $ 4,828 $ 9,655 $ 14,483 $ 18,828 $ 43,304 $ 9,655 $ 197,304 53rd St $ 91,168 $ 4,558 $ 9,117 $ 13,675 $ 17,778 $ 40,889 $ 9,117 $ 186,302 59th Pl $ 81,782 $ 4,089 $ 8,178 $ 12,267 $ 15,947 $ 36,679 $ 8,178 $ 167,122 Randolph St $ 56,000 $ 2,800 $ 5,600 $ 8,400 $ 10,920 $ 25,116 $ 5,600 $ 114,436 King Ave $ 37,360 $ 1,868 $ 3,736 $ 5,604 $ 7,285 $ 16,756 $ 3,736 $ 76,345 55th St $ 36,714 $ 1,836 $ 3,671 $ 5,507 $ 7,159 $ 16,466 $ 3,671 $ 75,025 60th St $ 34,970 $ 1,749 $ 3,497 $ 5,246 $ 6,819 $ 15,684 $ 3,497 $ 71,461 Wayfinding Program $ 20,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,900 $ 8,970 $ 2,000 $ 40,870 Alamo Ave $ 19,550 $ 978 $ 1,955 $ 2,933 $ 3,812 $ 8,768 $ 1,955 $ 39,950 Walker Ave $ 16,674 $ 834 $ 1,667 $ 2,501 $ 3,251 $ 7,478 $ 1,667 $ 34,073 Pine Ave $ 14,674 $ 734 $ 1,467 $ 2,201 $ 2,861 $ 6,581 $ 1,467 $ 29,986 Heliotrope Ave $ 13,150 $ 658 $ 1,315 $ 1,973 $ 2,564 $ 5,898 $ 1,315 $ 26,872 Prospect Ave $ 13,150 $ 658 $ 1,315 $ 1,973 $ 2,564 $ 5,898 $ 1,315 $ 26,872 Vinevale Ave $ 13,170 $ 659 $ 1,317 $ 1,976 $ 2,568 $ 5,907 $ 1,317 $ 26,913 Heliotrope Circle $ 7,800 $ 390 $ 780 $ 1,170 $ 1,521 $ 3,498 $ 780 $ 15,939 Carmelita Ave $ 3,932 $ 197 $ 393 $ 590 $ 767 $ 1,764 $ 393 $ 8,035 E 61st St $ 3,864 $ 193 $ 386 $ 580 $ 753 $ 1,733 $ 386 $ 7,896 Everett Ave $ 3,656 $ 183 $ 366 $ 548 $ 713 $ 1,640 $ 366 $ 7,471 Gifford Ave $ 3,656 $ 183 $ 366 $ 548 $ 713 $ 1,640 $ 366 $ 7,471 Woodlawn Ave $ 1,380 $ 69 $ 138 $ 207 $ 269 $ 619 $ 138 $ 2,820 57th St $ 414 $ 21 $ 41 $ 62 $ 81 $ 186 $ 41 $ 846
Mayflower Ave $ 276 $ 14 $ 28 $ 41 $ 54 $ 124 $ 28 $ 564 Maywood Ave $ 276 $ 14 $ 28 $ 41 $ 54 $ 124 $ 28 $ 564
TOTAL $ 3,394,187 $ 169,709 $ 339,419 $ 509,128 $ 661,866 $ 1,522,293 $ 339,419 $ 6,936,021 Mobilization 5%
Traffic Control 10%
Design 15%
Contingency 15%
Inflation (3% per year @ 30%
Ctti10%

PROJECTED PROJECT COSTS BY CORRIDOR
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 11 Page 259 of 360 Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 12 Goals
GOAL 1:

Improve overall motorized and non-motorized transportation modes - such as pedestrian, bicycle, and transit safety throughout the city GOAL 2:

Provide new network connections and leverage connections to existing and proposed local and regional facilities
GOAL 3:

Improve economic vitality by enhancing mobility and connectivity to the city’s several activity generators and destinations
GOAL 4:

Identify a set of active transportation facilities and improvements that can be accurately priced, prioritized, and submitted for construction funding and implementation
Vision Statement
The City of Maywood will be a safe place for residents to travel by non-motorized means. Residents of all incomes and abilities will have multiple affordable and safe mobility options available to complete short and longer trips.

How will this Plan Fulfill this Mission?
The City plans to take steps toward a safe street network that supports active transportation activity by implementing the goals, objectives, and recommendations in this document. In addition, cost estimates, a project prioritization list, and potential grant sources are provided.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 13

DATA COLLECTION

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

NEEDS ASSESSMENT
AUGUST
2022

NOVEMBER
2022

FINAL PLAN & PLAN

ADOPTION

SEPTEMBER
2022

DRAFT PLAN
MARCH
2023

OCTOBER
2023
Project Timeline
This Plan is the culmination of five distinct phases: 1) Data Collection, 2) Community Engagement, 3) Needs Assessment, 4) Draft Plan, 5) Plan Finalization and Adoption. This section describes each phase in detail.

DATA COLLECTION
The first phase focused on retrieving the existing conditions data needed to gain a comprehensive understanding of the community’s needs and issues. Informing the proposed treatments and projects included in this Plan were observations concerning travel and parking behavior as well as existing street characteristics, such as street widths and available non-motorized user and transit facilities. A comprehensive review of collisions along city streets also informed the types of countermeasures proposed in this Plan.

In addition, a review of plans and efforts completed at the local and regional level allowed the City to align all goals, policies, and projects with other efforts seeking to improve active transportation connectivity.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 14

DATA COLLECTION

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

NEEDS ASSESSMENT
AUGUST
2022

NOVEMBER
2022

FINAL PLAN & PLAN

ADOPTION

SEPTEMBER
2022
MARCH
2023

OCTOBER
2023

DRAFT PLAN

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
The City prioritized community engagement and made it a vital component of the project development process. Thus, project staff collected community input via five community events. Large maps, comment cards, and surveys were deployed to identify dangerous locations, frequently traveled corridors, and pressing safety issues. All community feedback was reviewed and used to guide solutions that directly address existing safety concerns with feasible infrastructure solutions.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 15

DATA COLLECTION

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

NEEDS ASSESSMENT
AUGUST
2022

NOVEMBER
2022

FINAL PLAN & PLAN

ADOPTION

SEPTEMBER
2022

DRAFT PLAN
MARCH
2023

OCTOBER
2023

NEEDS ASSESMENT
A survey was designed and distributed to gain insight on travel behavior patterns, community demographics, perception of walking and bicycling safety on the street, and interest in specific street safety features. The survey was available digitally as well as in hard copy in both English and Spanish. The digital survey was advertised through the project webpage, located within the City’s website and social media.

The community engagement section Chapter 5 summarizes the trends observed in survey participants’ responses.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 16

DATA COLLECTION

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

NEEDS ASSESSMENT
AUGUST
2022

NOVEMBER
2022

FINAL PLAN &

PLAN ADOPTION

SEPTEMBER
2022

DRAFT PLAN
MARCH
2023

OCTOBER
2023

DRAFTING THE PLAN
City engineers, planners, and community stakeholders reviewed the initial recommendations and their feasibility, consistency with new active transportation goals and objectives, and potential impact on walking and bicycling safety in the city. Once this review concluded, the project team refined recommendations in the Plan based on the comments provided.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 17

DATA COLLECTION

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

NEEDS ASSESSMENT
AUGUST
2022

NOVEMBER
2022

FINAL PLAN & PLAN

ADOPTION

SEPTEMBER
2022

DRAFT PLAN
MARCH
2023

OCTOBER
2023

PLAN FINALIZATION AND ADOPTION
In this phase, the project team accomplished the following actions to complete the Plan:
• Met with City public works staff to discuss proposed Plan treatments and suggested improvements • Finalized cost estimates for all infrastructure projects • Produced a list of prioritized projects to guide the city towards implementation • Present draft Plan to City Council and move towards adoption

MAYWOOD TODAY
CHAPTER2

Methodology
An existing conditions analysis was conducted, and several maps were produced to visualize commuting patterns, land use, transit ridership, collisions, and sociodemographic data in Maywood. Data regarding land use was acquired from the City of Maywood’s Land Use Element from its General Plan and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2019 Annual Land Use Dataset. Transit lines, stops, and arrival frequency data was derived from the Los Angeles County Transportation Authority (Metro) Open Data website, the City of Maywood’s Express Shuttle ridership report for August 2022, and the City of Huntington Park’s website. Weekday transit ridership data was collected for October 2019, as this represents a typical month before the COVID-19 pandemic. Collision data was collected from the California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) between January 1st, 2017, and December 31st, 2021. Sociodemographic data was gathered from the United States Census Bureau and community health data was gathered from the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) Neighborhood Edition Tool
Census Data
Census data was largely collected and analyzed at the census block level within the City of Maywood. Several analyzed parameters such as median household income, commuting patterns, and household access to motor vehicles were visualized from “Low” to “High.

Collision Data
Collision data was integrated into GIS, where it was separated based on what users were involved (i.e., motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians) and severity (i.e., fatality, severe injury, or visible injury). These collisions were then visualized based on density using graduated symbols by quantity.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 19 Page 267 of 360 Existing Condtions
Planning Context
The City of Maywood is committed to providing its residents with access to safe, practical, and quality active transportation facilities. The City continues to collaborate and coordinate with local stakeholders, neighboring municipalities, and regional agencies to develop policies and recommendations consistent with the region’s end goal to create a sustainable, multi-modal transportation system. The following are the planning policies, guidelines, and related projects fundamental to the development of the City’s ATP.

City of Maywood General Plan (2007)
The City of Maywood outlined its long-term vision in the General Plan in 2007 and is currently finalizing its updated Housing Element and developing its first Environmental Justice Element in compliance with SB 1000. The Maywood Active Transportation Plan will supplement the following General Plan goals that call out for a safer built environment that encourages all modes of transportation:

City of Maywood General Plan
• Land Use Element Goal 1: “Preserve and enhance the character and quality of Maywood’s residential neighborhoods.” • Land Use Element Goal 2: “Promote new commercial development and maintenance of existing commercial uses to enhance the quality of Maywood’s commercial districts along Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard.” • Land Use Element Goal 5: “Improve access to and quality of community services and facilities within the city.” • Land Use Element Goal 6: “Achieve aesthetic enhancements citywide to distinguish Maywood.” • Land Use Element Goal 9: “Protect, maintain, and better utilize existing parks and recreation facilities.” City of Maywood Circulation Element
• Circulation Element Goal 2: “Provide a local street system that accommodates current and future traffic volumes.” • Circulation Element Goal 3: “Facilitate Access to public Transportation that is safe and responsive to changing transit demands.”
• Circulation Element Goal 4: “Provide for an extensive, integrated, and safe bicycle, and pedestrian network throughout the community, and make Maywood a pedestrian friendly community. • Circulation Element Goal 5: “Ensure that all development projects provide well-designed parking facilities that are safe, convincing, and attractive.

Proposed and Ongoing City Plans, Projects, and Grant Applications The City of Maywood has several proposed and ongoing plans, projects, and grant applications that will inform the recommendations of the Active Transportation Plan.

City of Maywood Land Use Element Update (ongoing)
The City of Maywood is currently updating the Land Use Element of its General Plan. The revised element will focus on identifying the future locations and extent of new modal facilities and development. The Land Use Element supports the community’s desire to retain and expand upon Maywood’s diverse residential neighborhoods, the potential of its commercial corridors, and the public facilities and services provided to the community.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 20 Page 268 of 360 City of Maywood Environmental Justice Element Update (ongoing) The City of Maywood is currently in the process of developing its first ever Environmental Justice Element to include in its General Plan in compliance with Senate Bill 1000. Signed in 2016 by Governor Jerry Brown, SB 1000 requires that local governments identify disadvantaged communities within their jurisdictions and address local environmental justice issues in their city general plans.

City of Maywood Climate Action, Adaptation, and Resilience Plan (ongoing) The City of Maywood is working to complete a community-driven Climate Action Adaptation Resilience Plan that will accomplish the following: (1) Policy & Program Alignment, (2) Set Targets: Develop GHG Strategies, (3) Develop and Quantify Detailed GHG Reduction Measures, (4) Climate Action Plan (CAP) Document, (5) Climate change vulnerability/adaptation strategies.

City of Maywood Beautification Project (Funding awarded – not started) The City of Maywood was awarded a grant from the Clean California Local Grant Program to develop a project scope of work targeting multiple high priority areas of need. The project will include beautification through greening and landscaping as well as infrastructure improvements to increase accessibility and safety for bicyclists and pedestrians at multiple segments of parkways/ sidewalks, medians, and 20 signal cabinets/utility boxes throughout the city. These improvements are at Carmelita Avenue, between Fruitland Avenue, Loma Vista and 52nd Street; King Avenue, between Slauson Avenue and 59th Place; and Mayflower, between E Slauson Avenue and 59th Place.

City of Maywood Local Roadway and Safety Plan (Adopted) The City of Maywood recently adopted its Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). This plan will provide the City with a framework for systematic infrastructure improvements to mitigate key safety issues impacting Maywood residents.

Surounding Jurisdiction & Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans The following Master Plans are from adjacent cities and the County of Los Angeles that either share a border or have proposed bicycle facilities that would intersect with the City of Maywood.

Los Angeles River Master Plan (2022)
The City of Maywood is bordered to the east by the Los Angeles River and contains two access points, which provide Maywood residents with a dedicated Class I bicycle path through southeast Los Angeles County to Long Beach. According to the latest River Master Plan, the following recommendations were made within or adjacent to Maywood’s city limits:
• Improve the existing river access point at the northern city limit off Atlantic Avenue • Develop multiuse public space projects along the river at Maywood Park and Maywood Riverfront Park Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 21 Page 269 of 360 City of Commerce Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (2020) The City of Maywood does not currently have any established regional bicycle facilities to connect residents to northern jurisdictions in unincorporated Los Angeles County. In its most recent Bicycle Master Plan, the County of Los Angeles recommends:
• Extending the Los Angeles River Bicycle Path (Class I) north as well as installing a handful of Class III bicycle lanes to connect Maywood residents to the nearby jurisdictions of the Bandini Islands, the City of Los Angeles, and the City of Vernon.

City of Bell Bicycle Master Plan (2016)
The City of Bell shares Maywood’s southern border along Randolph Street and the northeastern border along the eastern bank of the Los Angeles River. In its most recent Bicycle Master Plan, the City of Bell recommends the following bicycle facilities that would connect to the City of Maywood:
• Installing a Class I shared use path along Randolph Street from Carmelita Avenue to the Los Angeles River Bicycle Path.

City of Huntington Park Bicycle Transportation Masterplan (2014) The City of Huntington Park shares Maywood’s southwestern border along Floral Avenue and Slauson Avenue. In its most recent Bicycle Transportation Master Plan, the City of Huntington Park recommends the following bicycle facilities that would connect to the City of Maywood:
• Installing a Class III bike lane along E 61st Street from Maywood Avenue to the eastern city limit on Pine Avenue. • Installing a Class III bike lane along Carmelita Avenue from Randolph Street to the northern city limit on Slauson Avenue.

Los Angeles County Bicycle Master Plan (2012)
The City of Maywood does not currently have any established regional bicycle facilities to connect residents to northern jurisdictions in unincorporated Los Angeles County. In its most recent Bicycle Master Plan, the County of Los Angeles recommends:
• Extending the Los Angeles River Bicycle Path (Class I) north as well as installing a handful of Class III bicycle lanes to connect Maywood residents to the nearby jurisdictions of the Bandini Islands, the City of Los Angeles, and the City of Vernon.

The Strategic Plan also calls for implementing the Rail to River project, a 3.9-mile regional connectivity loop to connect the Metro A (Blue) Line’s East Slauson Station to the Los Angeles River Bicycle Path (Class I) along Maywood’s southern city limit on Randolph Street.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 22 Page 270 of 360 Land Use
Maywood is made up of predominantly residential neighborhoods with commercial activity concentrated in its center and surrounded by industrial uses on its eastern, western, and northern city limits. Approximately 87 percent of the city’s parcels are zoned for residential use. Of those residential parcels, about 47 percent of residential parcels are zoned for single-family residential and about 40 percent are zoned for multi-family residential. Approximately five percent of the city’s parcels are zoned for commercial use. Most of the city’s commercial parcels are concentrated along Atlantic Boulevard and Slauson Avenue, with the highest concentration of commercial activity being at the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard and Slauson Avenue.

Approximately three percent of the city’s parcels are zones for industrial use. Most of the industrial parcels are located along Maywood’s eastern city limit along District Boulevard, northern city limit along Fruitland Avenue, and western city limit along Maywood Avenue.

Union Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
E Florence Ave Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long
Beach Fwy
Maywood
Bell
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
orona Ave
Ave
Ave
San Luis Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Pala Ave
Palm
Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn
Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
FIGURE 1: CITY ZONING, BY PARCEL
Legend
Maywood Landmarks
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Commercial
Schools
Industrial
Mixed Residential
and Commercial
Multi-Family
Residential
Open Space and
Recreation
Single Family
Residential
City Zoning
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 23 Page 271 of 360 Existing Roadway Facilities
The following section and maps focus on the existing roadway facilities and their functional classification, which will be used to inform the development of the Maywood ATP.

Maywood Street Classifications
The City’s Circulation Element in its 2007 General Plan classifies its streets into five categories: Freeways, major highways, secondary highways, collector streets, and local streets.

Freeway
A freeway is a controlled access, high-speed roadway with grade-separated interchanges. A freeway is intended to carry high volumes of traffic from region to region. The planning, design, construction, and maintenance of freeways in California are the responsibility of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans).

Major Highway
The function of a Major Highway is to connect traffic from minor arterials and collectors to other parts of the city, freeway interchanges, and adjacent major land uses. Major highways also provide a linkage between activity centers in the city to other adjacent communities and other parts of the region. Access to adjacent land uses and the presence of parking should be minimal or prohibited completely.

This roadway classification is designed to move large volumes of traffic, typically in the range of 40,000 to 60,000 vehicles per day. Per the circulation element, Major Highways typically have a curb-to-curb width of 84 feet within a 100-foot right-of-way.

Collector Street
The primary purpose of a collector street is to serve as an intermediate route to carry traffic between local streets and highways.

Collectors are intended to provide access to all types of land uses and generally have no limitation on access. Parking is typically allowed during all periods of the day or, if necessary, may be prohibited during peak hours on certain segments.

This roadway classification is designed to carry moderate levels of traffic, generally in the range of 10,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day.

Per the circulation element, a collector typically has a curb-to-curb width that ranges from 40 to 54 feet contained within a 64-foot rightof-way.

Local Street
Local streets provide direct vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access to adjacent land uses. They are intended to carry low volumes of traffic, are typically narrow, and allow unrestricted parking. Per the circulation element, a local street in Maywood typically has a 36-footcurb-to-curb width within a 50-foot right-of-way.

Designated Truck Route
The Circulation Element also identifies designated truck routes throughout Maywood that connect with those in adjacent cities and jurisdictions. These routes are responsible for ensuring the efficient movement of commercial vehicles carrying goods in and out of the city. Maywood experiences high levels of freight movement given its adjacent industrial land uses as well as its proximity to the Long Beach Freeway (I- 710), the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5), and its proximity to the industrial City of Vernon. It is imperative to the city that these routes are maintained and improved to maximize safe and efficient traffic flows for non- truck motorists and pedestrians.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 24 Page 272 of 360 Union Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
e
E Florence Ave Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long Beach Fwy
Maywood
Bell
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
Corona Ave
rd Ave
rd Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Pala Ave
Palm Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Legend
Maywood Landmarks
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Truck Route
Designated Truck Route
FIGURE 2: CITY STREET CLASSIFICATIONS
FIGURE 3: CITY DESIGNATED TRUCK ROUTES
nion Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
California Ave
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Wilcox Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long Beach Fwy
Maywood
Bell
Salt Lake Park
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
Flora Ave
Bell Ave
Corona Ave
Orchard Ave
Gifford Ave
San Luis Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Crafton Ave
Pala Ave
Palm Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
City Street Categories
Major Highway
Collector Street
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Secondary Highway
Legend
Figure 2 and Figure 3 illustrate
the locations of Maywood’s highest
volume streets and dedicated truck
routes, respectively.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 25 Page 273 of 360 Intersections and Existing Traffic Control Devices
There are a total of 165 intersections in the City of Maywood. Of that total, only 21 (13 percent) of those intersections are signalized. All the city’s signalized intersections are located along its two major arterials, Atlantic Boulevard and E Slauson Avenue.

Of its 165 intersections, 144 (87 percent) are unsignalized, which are mostly four-way stop-controlled. Figure 4 illustrates the locations of the City’s signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Union Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
California
Ave
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Wilcox Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long
Beach
Fwy
Maywood
Bell
Salt Lake Park
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
ora Ave
Bell Ave
Corona Ave
Orchard Ave
Gifford Ave
uis Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
on Ave
Pala Ave
Palm
Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn
Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
City Street Categories
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Legend
Unsignalized
Intersection: 144
Signalized
Intersection: 21
00 0.25 .5
Miles
FIGURE 4: CITY SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 26 Page 274 of 360 Socio-Economic Characteristics
The following section, including tables, and maps focus on the socio-economic indicators used to inform the development of the Maywood ATP.

Total Population, Race, Ethnicity and Age
Per the 2020 American Community Survey (ACS), approximately 25,138 people currently reside in the City of Maywood. Of those, about 97 percent identify as Hispanic/Latino, almost double the rate of Hispanic/Latino identifying residents in Los Angeles County. Less than two percent of the city’s population is comprised of other racial demographics including White, African American, Asian, American Indian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Island, and people with two or more races (Table 1).

The median age in Maywood is 32 years old, with nearly 28 percent of its population under the age of 18, which is higher than the County by about seven percent.

TABLE 1: RACE, ETHNICITY AND AGE
City of Maywood Los Angeles County
Category Percentage of Population Percentage of Population Hispanic/Latino 97.1% 48.0%
White 1.4% 25.6%
Black Alone 0.4% 7.6%
Multi-racial 0.4% 3.1%
Asian Alone 0.3% 14.7%
American Indian 0.1% 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.05% 3.1%
Median Age 32 years old 37 years old
Under 18 years 27.9% 22.2%
Over 18 years 72.1% 80.4%
Over 65 years 10.2% 12.9%
(US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates, 2020) Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 27 Page 275 of 360 Educational Attainment and School Enrollment
Maywood has much lower educational attainment levels in comparison to Los Angeles County. Approximately 37 percent of Maywood residents 25 years and older have not received a high school diploma – 15 percent higher than the County (Table 2). Less than 5 percent of Maywood residents 25 years and older have received either an associate’s, bachelor’s, or post-graduate degree.

Approximately 72 percent of Maywood residents three years and older are enrolled in a K-12 program.

Income, Housing and Employment Levels
Maywood residents currently earn lower incomes than other jurisdictions within Los Angeles County. The median household income in Maywood is $50,996 – almost $20,000 less than the County median household income. Approximately 20 percent of Maywood residents live under the poverty line and about ten percent of occupied housing units in Maywood do not have access to an automobile. It is also worth noting that approximately 56 percent of Maywood households are occupied by one or more people under 18 years old – 22 percent higher than the County.

Additionally, about 61 percent of Maywood residents over 16 years old are employed, just slightly below County employment levels (65 percent). Figure 5 illustrates median household income levels at the census block level for the city.

TABLE 2: EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
City of Maywood Los Angeles County
Category Percentage of Population
over 25 Years Old
Percentage of Population
over 25 Years Old
No High School
Diploma 36.6% 11.9%
High School
Diploma Only 27.5% 20.4%
Some College,
No Degree 11.1% 18.9%
Associates
Degree 3.3% 37.0%
Bachelor’s
Degree 4.9% 21.8%
Post-Graduate
Degree 2.5% 11.7%
(US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates, 2020) Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 28 Page 276 of 360 Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
California
Ave
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Wilcox Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long
Beach
Fwy
Maywood
Bell
Salt Lake Park
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
Flora Ave
Bell Ave
Corona Ave
Orchard Ave
Gifford Ave
San Luis Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Crafton Ave
Pala Ave
Palm
Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn
Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
FIGURE 5: CITY MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME LEVELS, BY CENSUS BLOCK Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
Median Household Income
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Legend
Low: $21,500.00 -
$31,914.00
Medium: $31,914.01
- $46,250.00
High: $46,250.01 -
$73,750.00
Commuting Patterns
Table 3 provides a breakdown of the City’s commuter patterns, by mode, compared to Los Angeles County. Like the County, most Maywood commuters drive to work alone (70.6 percent). Maywood does have higher levels of commuters who carpool, take public transportation, and walk than the County.

Cycling, working from home, and other modes of travel are the least used by Maywood commuters and are at lower levels than the County. The average travel time for Maywood commuters is approximately 31 minutes, just under the average commute time for LA County (Table 3).

Figure 6 illustrates the commuting levels of Maywood workers who travel to work using public transportation and the existing Metro bus lines running through the city. (US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates, 2020) Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 29 Page 277 of 360 on Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
California
Ave
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Wilcox Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long
Beach Fwy
Maywood
Bell
Salt Lake Park
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
Flora Ave
Bell Ave
Corona Ave
Orchard Ave
Gifford Ave
San Luis Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Crafton Ave
Pala Ave
Palm Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic
Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
FIGURE 6: COMMUTING TO WORK VIA PUBLIC TRANSIT
Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
Public Transit Commute Levels
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Legend
Metro Transit Stop
Line 611
Line 260
Line 108
Low: 1.9% - 2.5%
Medium: 2.6% -

7.0%
High: 7.1% - 9.4%
Metro
(US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates, 2020) TABLE 3: COMMUTING PATTERNS
City of Maywood Los Angeles County
Category Percentage of Population
over 16 Years Old
Percentage of Population
over 16 Years Old
Drove Alone 72.1% 72.1%
Carpool 13.0% 9.5%
Public Transit 6.0% 5.4%
Walk 4,1% 2.6%
Bike 0.7% 1.7%
Work from Home 3.6% 8.0%
(US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates, 2020) Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 30 Page 278 of 360 Top Employment Centers
Based on the latest Census data on the top locations for Maywood commuters (2019), the majority of the City’s workforce commutes to the City of Los Angeles. The City of Maywood, City of Downey, and City of South Gate are the next largest employment centers for Maywood workers (Table 4).

TABLE 4: TOP EMPLOYMENT CENTERS FOR MAYWOOD COMMUTERS
City of Maywood
Local Jurisdiction Percentage of Commuters
City of Los Angeles 22.9%
City of Maywood 6.9%
City of Downey 3.3%
City of South Gate 2.9%
City of Bell 2.6%
City of Huntington Park 3.6%
East Los Angeles 2.5%
City of Long Beach 2.4%
City of Lynwood 1.7%
(US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year
Estimates, 2020)
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 31 Page 279 of 360 Community Health Characteristics
The following section and tables focus on community health indicators for Maywood adults and children used to inform the development of the Maywood ATP.

Adults
Estimates for asthma, diabetes, obesity, and physical activity for Maywood adults over eighteen years old were calculated using the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) Neighborhood Edition Tool and serves as the foundation of this health status summary.

Asthma
According to the latest available CHIS data, the percentage of Maywood adults (18+) diagnosed with asthma increased between 2016 and 2020. Los Angeles County adult asthma levels remained higher than Maywood throughout the same period, following a similar upward trend of more adults being diagnosed with asthma in 2020 (Table 5).

Diabetes
According to the latest available CHIS data, the percentage of Maywood adults (18+) diagnosed with diabetes increased between 2016 and 2020. Adult diabetes levels in Maywood were higher than Los Angeles County throughout the same period and experienced a sharper rate of increase (Table 5).

Obesity
According to the latest available CHIS data, the percentage of Maywood adults (18+) identified as obese/overweight (having a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher) increased between 2016 and 2020. Adult obesity levels in Maywood were much higher than Los Angeles County throughout the same period (Table 5).

Physical Activity
According to the latest available CHIS data, the percentage of Maywood adults walking at least 150 minutes or more for transportation or leisure in the past week increased between 2012 and 2016. Although Maywood adult physical activity levels were lower than Los Angeles County in 2012, the city experienced higher levels than the County in 2016 as seen in Table 5.

TABLE 5: ADULT PHYSICAL HEALTH
City of Maywood Los Angeles County Maywood Los Angeles County Year 2016 2020
Ever Diagnsosed
With Astma (18+) 9.3% 12.8% 11.2% 15.2%
Ever Diagnsosed
With Diabetes (18+) 11.8% 9.5% 15.7% 11.8%
Obese (18+) 41.6% 28.9% 43.7% 29.6%
(California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) Neighborhood Edition Tool) Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 32 Page 280 of 360 Children
Estimates for asthma, obesity, and physical activity for Maywood children under the age of eighteen were calculated through the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) Neighborhood Edition tool. The breakdown of those results is described below.

Asthma
According to the latest available CHIS data, the percentage of Maywood children (1-17) diagnosed with asthma decreased between 2016 and 2020. Los Angeles County child asthma levels were static during the same period, but remained slightly higher than Maywood child diagnosis levels in 2020. (Table 6).

Overweight for Age Group and Obesity
According to the latest available CHIS data, the percentage of Maywood children between the ages of two and eleven years old identified as being overweight for their age (having a weight equal or greater than the 95th percentile) sharply increased between 2016 and 2020. Los Angeles County levels also increased throughout the same period; however, at a much lower rate than Maywood (Table 6).

TABLE 6: CHILDREN PHYSICAL HEALTH
City of Maywood Los Angeles County Maywood Los Angeles County Year 2016 2020
Ever Diagnsosed
With Astma (<18) 16.6% 12.8% 11.3% 12.9%
Overweight for Age
(2-11) 17.4% 12.1% 20.4% 13.5%
Obese (12-17) 37.0% 35.5% 52.5% 34.2%
(California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) Neighborhood Edition Tool) Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 33 Page 281 of 360 Collision Analysis
The following section and tables focus on the collision data collected from January 1st, 2017 – December 31st, 2021, that was used to inform the development of the Maywood ATP.

Total Collisions
The City of Maywood experienced 182 collisions between 2017 and 2021. Approximately 75 percent of collisions involved only motor vehicles, 15 percent involved motor vehicles and pedestrians, 10 percent involved motor vehicles and bicyclists, and one percent involved motor vehicles and both pedestrians and bicyclists.

Although the City has experienced a net decrease in collisions, numbers began to climb in 2021 following a four-year consecutive drop from 2017-2020. Motor vehicle collisions involving pedestrians and bicyclists also experienced a net decrease during the same period.

Pedestrian collisions peaked in 2017 and 2019 before dropping again from 2020- 2021. Bicycle collisions dropped from their highest levels from 2017- 2018 to zero in 2019 and remained well under their peak in 2021. The largest contributor to the rise in 2021 collisions were motor vehicle collisions involving other motor vehicle. These collisions consecutively decreased from their peak in 2017 to their lowest in 2020 before sharply increasing to near 2017 levels in 2021.

Figure 7 and Figure 8 illustrate the density of all collisions and all bicycle and pedestrian collisions in Maywood from 2017-2021, respectively. Table 7 provides the total number of crashes by mode per year from 2017-2021.

FIGURE 7: ALL COLLISIONS HEATMAP (2017-2021)
Union Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
ia Ave
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
ve
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long Beach Fwy
Maywood
Bell
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
Bell Ave
Corona Ave
Orchard Ave
Gifford Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Pala Ave
Palm Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
Collision Density
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Legend
Sparse
Dense
(SWITRS, 2017 - 2021 Collision Data Base)
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 34 Page 282 of 360 FIGURE 8: ALL PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE COLLISIONS (2017-2021) nion Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
California Ave
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Wilcox Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long Beach Fwy
Maywood
Bell
Salt Lake Park
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
Flora Ave
Bell Ave
Corona Ave
Orchard Ave
Gifford Ave
San Luis Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Crafton Ave
Pala Ave
Palm Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
Collisions
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Legend
Pedestrian Collision (28)
Bicycle Collision (19)
TABLE 7: TOTAL COLLISIONS BY MODE AND YEAR (2017-2021)
(SWITRS, 2017 - 2021 Collision Data Base)
Motor Vehicle Involving
Year Motor Vehicle Pedestrian Bicycle Bike and Ped
2017 32 9 7 0
2018 30 5 6 0
2019 27 5 0 1
2020 20 5 3 0
2021 27 3 2 0
Total 136 27 18 1
(SWITRS, 2017 - 2021 Collision Data Base)
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 35 Page 283 of 360 Primary Collision Factors
As shown in Table 8, the leading primary collision factors in the City of Maywood from 2017-2021 were:
• Failure to Yield to Other Vehicles: 21 percent
• Improper Turning: 20 percent
• Failure to Obey Traffic Siganals and Signs: 17 percent Table 9 illustrates the most common pedestrian actions at the time of collision in the City of Maywood from 2017-2021. Most of these collisions (about 17 percent) occurred as a pedestrian was crossing the street at an intersection using a crosswalk.

TABLE 8: PRIMARY COLLISION FACTORS (2017-2021)
TABLE 9: PEDESTRIAN ACTIONS AT TIME OF COLLISION (2017-2021) Motor Vehicle Involving
Year Motor Vehicle Pedestrian Bicycle Percentage of Total Collisions Automobile Right of Way 28 1 2 20.7%
Improper Turning 15 3 3 19.5%
Traffic Signals and Signs 23 4 2 17.2%
Unsafe Speeds 14 0 1 6.9%
Pedestrian Right of Way 0 12 0 13.8%
(SWITRS, 2017 - 2021 Collision Data Base)
Number of Collisions Percentage of Total Collisions
Pedestrian Action - -
Crossing in Crosswalk at Intersection 20 17.4%
Crossing outside Crosswalk 4 14.3%
In Road, Including Shoulder 2 7.1%
Not in Road 2 7.1%
(SWITRS, 2017 - 2021 Collision Data Base)
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 36 Page 284 of 360 Collisions by Day of Week and Time of Day
Table 10 provides a breakdown of when and how frequently crashes occurred from 2017-2021 in the City of Maywood, by time of day. Based on the collision data, crashes peaked during the weekends on Fridays and Saturdays between the hours of the early afternoon and evening. The following days and time periods experienced the highest volume of collisions:
• Friday 3:00PM - 5:59PM (11 crashes)
• Friday 12:00PM - 2:59PM (9 crashes)
• Saturday 6:00PM - 8:59PM (8 crashes)
Collisions by Severity
There were 2 fatalities and 16 severe injury collisions from 2017-2019. One of the fatalities was a pedestrian-related collision that took place at 2:00pm on a Friday in March 2017. An intoxicated driver was speeding and lost control, hitting pedestrians on the sidewalk – fatally injuring one. The crash took place on Heliotrope Avenue near the intersection with E 59th Street.

The other fatality involved a motorist colliding with another motorist that occurred at 12:10pm on a Monday in January 2019. A vehicle failed to stop at a stop light and side-swiped another vehicle, fatally injuring one of the drivers. The crash took place on Loma Vista Avenue, near the intersection with Fruitland Avenue.

Figure 9 maps all fatal and severe injury collisions between 2017 and 2021.

TABLE 10: NUMBER OF COLLISIONS PER DAY OF WEEK AND TIME (2017-2021) Time Period Hours Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday AM
00:00 - 2:59 3 0 0 0 0 6 2
03:00 - 5:59 1 3 3 0 3 1 0
06:00 - 8:59 2 3 4 4 4 4 1
09:00 - 11:59 5 1 8 4 5 5 1
PM
12:00 - 14:59 2 5 3 3 9 2 4
15:00 - 17:59 7 5 5 4 11 5 2
18:00 - 20:59 4 2 2 7 4 8 6
21:00 - 23:59 0 2 1 0 3 2 1
(SWITRS, 2017 - 2021 Collision Data Base)
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 37 Page 285 of 360 FIGURE 9 : ALL FATAL AND SEVERE (KSI) INJURIES (2017-2021) Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
California
Ave
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Wilcox Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long
Beach
Fwy
Maywood
Bell
Salt Lake Park
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
Flora Ave
Bell Ave
Corona Ave
Orchard Ave
Gifford Ave
San Luis Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Crafton Ave
Pala Ave
Palm
Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn
Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
Collisions
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Legend
Severe Injury (16)
Fatal (2)
(SWITRS, 2017 - 2021 Collision Data Base)
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 38 Page 286 of 360 Public Transportation
Maywood is serviced by a total of five bus lines provided by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), City of Maywood, and City of Huntington Park.

Metro
Existing Service Lines and Stops
There are three Metro Bus Local Lines that run through Maywood and a total of 41 bus stops (Figure 10):
• Line 108 runs East/West, from Pico Rivera to Marina Del Rey, and travels directly through Maywood via Slauson Avenue. Line 108 connects Maywood residents to other jurisdictions including Commerce, Huntington Park, Ladera Heights, and Culver City. • Line 260 runs North/South, from Compton to Pasadena, and travels through the center of Maywood via Atlantic Boulevard. Line 260 connects Maywood residents to other jurisdictions including Paramount, South Gate, Monterey Park, and Alhambra.

Line 611 runs on a clockwise/counterclockwise route that connects the northeastern Gateway Cities and travels through the center Maywood via E Slauson Avenue heading eastbound before turning northbound on Atlantic Boulevard and finally heading westbound on District Boulevard. Line 611 connects Maywood residents to other neighboring jurisdictions including Vernon, Huntington Park, South Gate, and Bell.

FIGURE 10 : ALL METRO BUS LINE ROUTES AND STOPS
(LACMTA ArcGIS Online Gallery, April 2019; LACMTA Maps & Schedules, 2023) Union Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long Beach Fwy
Maywood
Bell
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
orona Ave
Ave
d Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Pala Ave
Palm Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Legend
Metro Transit Stop
Line 611
Line 260
Line 108
Metro
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 39 Page 287 of 360 Line Frequency & Ridership Activity
Table 11 provides arrival frequency levels at each bus line’s busiest stop during the weekday morning rush (6:00AM-8:00AM).

According to Metro’s scheduling data, Line 108 provides the most frequent weekday morning rush service, averaging about eight to nine buses per hour and an average wait time of seven minutes between each arrival.

Figure 11 illustrates total ridership activity by stop during the month of April in 2019. April 2019 was selected for this analysis as it represents a typical month in transit usage pre-pandemic. Based on Metro’s data, the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard and E Slauson Avenue experienced the highest level of ridership activity in Maywood. This intersection also serves as a transfer point for lines 108, 260, and 611.

FIGURE 11: WEEKLY METRO BUS BOARDINGS AND ALIGHTINGS
(LACMTA ArcGIS Online Gallery, April 2019; LACMTA Maps & Schedules, 2023) TABLE 11: AVERAGE METRO BUS LINE FREQUENCY AT BUSIEST STOPS Busiest Stop Arrivals per Hour Average Wait Time
Bus Line - - -
108 SLAUSON / ATLANTIC 8 - 9 Approximately 7 minutes
260 ATLANTIC / SLAUSON 4 - 5 Approximately 15 minutes
611 ATLANTIC / SLAUSON 1 - 2 Approximately 60 minutes
(LACMTA ArcGIS Online Gallery, April 2019; LACMTA Maps & Schedules, 2023) Union Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
ve
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long Beach Fwy
Maywood
Bell
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
Corona Ave
hard Ave
fford Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Pala Ave
Palm Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St
Carmelita Ave
Fishburn Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
0 025 05
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Legend
Metro Transit Stop
Line 611
Line 260
Line 108
Metro Stops and Lines
Boardings + Alightings
ONs + OFFs
5 - 62
63 - 237
238 - 827
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 40 Page 288 of 360 Maywood Express Shuttle
The City of Maywood provides a dial-a-ride transit service for senior and disabled residents. Eligible riders may be picked up and transported within Maywood city limits. The Maywood Express Shuttle runs on a closed loop, connecting residents to popular destinations and landmarks such as Riverfront Park, Southeast Rio Vista YMCA, Maywood Village Square Shopping Center, and City Hall.

According to the City’s August 2022 ridership report, the Maywood Shuttle Express provided a total of 354 trips in that month alone to qualified residents. The average distance traveled per trip was 1.35 miles and each passenger spent an average of about 10 minutes per trip.

FIGURE 12: MAYWOOD EXPRESS SHUTTLE ROUTE AND STOPS
Union Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
California Ave
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Wilcox Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long Beach Fwy
Maywood
Bell
Salt Lake Park
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
Flora Ave
Bell Ave
Corona Ave
Orchard Ave
Gifford Ave
San Luis Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Crafton Ave
Pala Ave
Palm Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St Carmelita Ave
Fishburn Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Legend
Route and Stops
Stops
Route
(City of Maywood, Aug 2022)
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 41 Page 289 of 360 Huntington Park Express
The City of Huntington Park provides a municipal bus line that briefly runs through Maywood via Slauson Avenue and Gifford Avenue.

The bus line provides access to popular destinations across Huntington Park as well as the southwestern city limits of Vernon and the northwestern city limits of South Gate. The average wait time between bus arrivals during the weekday is approximately every 25 minutes.

Within Maywood, residents can board the Huntington Park Express at the following four stops:
• Stop 36: Slauson Avenue between S Maywood Avenue and Everett Avenue • Stop 37: Slauson Avenue and Carmelita Avenue
• Stop 38: Slauson Avenue and Corona Avenue
• Stop 39: Slauson Avenue and Gifford Avenue
FIGURE 13: HUNTINGTON PARK EXPRESS ROUTE AND STOPS
Union Pacific RR
AT And SF Rlwy
AT And SF Rlwy
District Blvd
Maywood Ave
California Ave
Gage Ave
District Blvd
Bandini Blvd
Gage Ave
Wilcox Ave
Heliotrope Ave
Long Beach Fwy
Long Beach Fwy
Maywood
Bell
Salt Lake Park
E 60th St
E 61st St
Loma Vista Ave Fruitland Ave
Randolph St
Gifford Ave
Corona Ave
Bear Ave
E 54th St
E 52nd St
Flora Ave
Bell Ave
Corona Ave
Orchard Ave
Gifford Ave
San Luis Ave
Ayers Ave
Randolph St
E 58th St Pine Ave
Woodlawn Ave
Walker Ave
Mayflower Ave
Clarkson Ave
District Blv
V
d
inevale Ave
E 59th Pl
Prospect Ave
E 55th St
E 52nd Dr
King Ave
Flora Ave
Alamo Ave
Crafton Ave
Pala Ave
Palm Ave
Everett Ave
E 53rd St
E 56th St
E 57th St Carmelita Ave
Fishburn Ave
E 52nd Pl
E 60th Pl
Woodward Ave
Atlantic Blvd
Slauson Ave
710
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Maywood Elementary
School
Fishburn Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Center for
Enriched Students
Heliotrope Ave
Elementary School
Maywood Academy
High School
St Rose of Lima
School
Benito Juarez
Park Pixely Park
Riverfront Park
Maywood Park
Pine Park
Loma Vista Ave
Elementary School
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Maywood Destinations
City Hall
Library
Schools
Parks
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River
Bike Path Entrance
Legend
Route and Stops
Stops
Route
(City of Huntington Park, Aug 2016)
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 42 Page 290 of 360

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE TOOLBOX
CHAPTER 3

The Active Transportation Infrastructure Toolbox
contains safety elements with transformative
potential when applied appropriately to streets.

Each safety element listed in this section can
increase street user comfort for those walking
and bicycling, help achieve local and intercity
connectivity, and raise street safety within the city.

Several elements in this toolbox were applied
to the proposed network exhibited in Chapter 5
(Recommendations). The toolbox categorizes
safety elements into three categories: Bicycle,
Pedestrian, and Roadway.

Bicycle Improvements
This set of safety treatments enhances bicyclist
presence at intersections and reduces stress on
corridors for all types of riders. The end goal is
to address the needs of each of the four types of
riders highlighted in Figure 14.
?

NO WAY, NO HOW

PEOPLE UNWILLING TO BICYCLE

EVEN IF HIGH-QUALITY BICYCLE

INFRASTRUCTURE IS IN PLACE

INTERESTED BUT

CONCERNED

PEOPLE WILLING TO BICYCLE

IF HIGH-QUALITY BICYCLE

INFRASTRUCTURE IS IN PLACE

ENTHUSED & CONFIDENT

PEOPLE WILLING TO BICYCLE

IF SOME BICYCLE-SPECIFIC

INFRASTRUCTURE IS IN PLACE

STRONG & FEARLESS

PEOPLE WILLING TO BICYCLE WITH

LIMITED OR NO BICYCLE-SPECIFIC

INRASTRUCTURE
FIGURE 14: FOUR TYPES OF RIDERS
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 44 Page 292 of 360 A Bike Boulevard is a street designed
to prioritize and promote safe bicycle
travel. These streets have low posted
vehicle speeds, traffic volumes, and
feature complimentary traffic calming
measures, such as speed cushions,
signage, and pavement markings. Bike
Boulevards prompt drivers to be more
aware of cyclists and help encourage
more people to use bicycles as a more
regular mode of transportation.

Class III - Bicycle Boulevard
Bicycle Improvements
Bike Network Wayfinding consists of
signs and directional cues specifically
designed to guide cyclists along
designated bike routes. Clear and
consistent wayfinding signage reduces
the likelihood of cyclists straying into
areas with higher traffic and potential
hazards.

Bike Network Wayfinding
A Bike Loop Detection Sign is a
safety measure used at signalized
intersections that provides instructions
for bicyclists on how to request a
green light by either placing their bike
on a specific location on the pavement
or by using a specialized push button.

Bike Detection Signage
Bike Push Buttons are safety measures
used at signalized intersections to
alert signal controllers that a bicyclist
is requesting a green light.They help
avoid crowding on the sidewalk, reduce
delays for bicycle travel, and improve
safety for cyclists crossing busy streets.

Bike Push Button
Bike Detection Loops are safety
measures used at signalized
intersections to alert the signal controller
that a bicyclist is requesting a green
light. They work by recalibrating the
same sensor used to identify cars to
also detect bikes waiting at a red light.

Bike Loop Detector
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 45 Page 293 of 360 A High Visibility Crosswalk is a
crosswalk painted with bold and highly
visible markings, often with contrasting
colors to the road. These markings
help draw attention to the presence
of pedestrians and encourage drivers
to yield. By making crosswalks more
noticeable, especially in areas where
there may be poor lighting or heavy
traffic, pedestrians become more
visible to drivers, reducing the chance
of vehicle collisions.

High Visibility Crosswalk
Pedestrian Improvements
A Leading Pedestrian Interval
(LPI) is a safety measure used at
intersections with traffic signals that
give pedestrians between a three to
seven second head start to begin
crossing the street before vehicles
can move. During this interval,
pedestrians are more visible to drivers,
lowering the likelihood of conflicts with
turning vehicles. LPIs are particularly
beneficial in areas with high foot traffic
and turning vehicle movements.

Leading Pedestrian Interval
This pair of walking-related improvements prioritizes enhancing the walking experience on existing walking spaces, such as sidewalks, by reducing exposure to vehicular movements on the roadway while crossing the street.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 46 Page 294 of 360 Roadway Improvements
Roadway treatments address reported dangerous driving behaviors, improve street operations, and help encourage more residents to use active transportation. Specific behaviors that this set primarily prevents is speeding on residential streets and near sensitive uses, and improper turns at intersections.

A Multi-Way Stop is a traffic control
measure that requires vehicles on all
approaches to stop at an unsignalized
intersection. They can help
improve safety for all road users at
intersections with a history of crashes
or with limited visibility. By forcing
vehicles to come to a complete
stop, a Multi-Way Stop provides
pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles the
convenience to safely cross the street
without having to anticipate fastmoving traffic.

Multi-Way Stop
A Curb Extension involves extending
the sidewalk or pedestrian crossing
area into the street. This design
reduces the distances pedestrians
need to cross a street, makes them
more visible to drivers, and slows
down vehicles as they transition from
wider corridors to narrower residential
streets. Curb extensions create safer
and more comfortable spaces for
pedestrians and encourage drivers to
yield to crossing pedestrians.

Curb Extension
Edge Line markings are traffic
calming measures that use solid
painted lines used to indicate the
edge of a roadway where travel is
not permitted. As a neighborhood
safety measure, Edge Line markings
can visually narrow travel lanes on
wider streets to prompt drivers to slow
down in areas where speeding is a
problem.

Edge Line Treatment
Speed Cushions are traffic calming
measures that use raised platforms
placed across the road at regular
intervals to slow down vehicle traffic.

Speed cushions are most effective in
areas where speeding is a problem,
as they encourage drivers to slow
down and pay more attention to
their surroundings, reducing the
risk of vehicle accidents involving
pedestrians and cyclists.

Speed Cushion
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 47 Page 295 of 360 WHAT DID THE COMMUNITY HAVE TO SAY?
CHAPTER 4

Outreach Approach and Themes
Estolano Advisors (EA) partnered with People for Mobility Justice (PMJ) to engage with stakeholders in Maywood about potential street treatments in the Maywood ATP.

The proposed treatments in the ATP were presented to community members at five separate outreach events:
• The tree lighting ceremony at City Hall (December 2022) • Community Charrette #1 at Fishburn Avenue Elementary School (January 2023) • The backpack and school supply distribution at the YMCA (August 2023) • The mobile food pantry at the YMCA (August 2023)
• Community Charrette #2 at Fishburn Avenue Elementary School (October 2023) About 150 people were engaged across these four events, with responses from community members falling into themes: excessive vehicle speeds, narrow streets, unsafe streets, and street treatments. All outreach collateral and general community responses are provided in Appendix B and Appendix C, respectively.

Excessive Vehicle Speeds
Most community members were concerned about excessive vehicle speeds on major thoroughfares like Slauson Avenue or Atlantic Boulevard, and neighborhood streets like King Avenue, or 53rd Street. Older residents voiced safety concerns with fast moving cars, especially around schools and neighborhood streets. While interested in street treatments that slow down cars such as speed humps and stop signs, some community members reported that treatments alone would not slow down speeding cars. Community members reported speeding cars neglecting to stop at stop signs.

Narrow Streets
Many community members commented that neighborhood streets are narrow; given the width of these roadways, respondents raised concerns about adding bike routes, curb extensions, or edge lines. Some community members offered alternative solutions like converting some streets such as 53rd St into one-way traffic, and then adding a Class II or III bike lane. Only a few community members shared that they would prefer no bike lanes at all because of how narrow the streets are.

EA Staff engage with community members at the backpack and school supply distribution event at the local YMCA
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 49 Page 297 of 360 Unsafe Streets
Certain streets routinely came up in conversation as feeling unsafe and in need of treatments. Community members mentioned the following streets and their issues:
• King Avenue needs more speed humps and crosswalks, particularly near schools • Everett Avenue needs more speed humps, and drivers are not stopping at the existing stop signs • E 52nd and E 53 Street both needs more speed humps, are not stopping at the existing stop signs • Multiple community members are concerned about fast moving cars, vans, and trucks around the Amazon Fufillment facility at District Boulevard and S Atlantic Boulevard
• Other streets that were specifically reported and generally unsafe included Fishburn Avenue, Maywood Avenue, Slauson Avenue, and Gifford Avenue Community Reactions to Proposed Recommendations
Certain treatments garnered lots of support while others were more divisive. Specifically, community members identified speed humps, repairing bus shelters, stop signs, and crossing guards near schools as necessary improvements. Community members also provided insightful feedback on the proposed treatments:
• Treatments that generally concern pedestrian safety, specifically high-visibility crosswalks and leading pedestrian intervals, received high levels of support • Curb extensions, however, were less popular, as the street-narrowing safety feature would exacerbate already narrow streets • Bike intersection improvements like detection loops, detection loop signs, and push buttons received almost all “yes” votes • Stop signs received overwhelming support, but some community members were skeptical noting that they would require more enforcement to be effective, citing that many cars run stop signs in Maywood
• Edge line treatments were noted as important for parked cars, but existing narrow streets were often mentioned • Speed humps received unanimous support from community members who walk, but a minority of drivers disapproved, citing the potential damage to their vehicles
Public Outreach Workshop Summaries
Most people walked to these outreach events, followed by drivers, and then bicycle and transit riders. This breakdown is reflected in higher interest in pedestrian improvements (such as crosswalks or leading pedestrian intervals), contrasted with the relatively lower interest in bicycle infrastructure.

Car speed is the main traffic safety issue for Maywood pedestrians, and some of the treatments that deal with speed can help. However, there was a small contingency of drivers that felt hesitation towards speed humps. Community members felt that signs can be useful, but they have witnessed many cars running stop signs. Several community members called for more enforcement of stop signs and traffic signals, specifically via law enforcement officers and traffic cameras.

The community members engaged at outreach events were highly aware of the safety issues on their streets. Overall, people were interested in making streets safer for pedestrians and cyclists and felt that some of the treatments would provide that safety. Community members that walk, bike, and roll on the streets in the City of Maywood shared their local knowledge of streets that feel unsafe. Their expertise provides granular data that calls out specific streets and places in need of treatment.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 50 Page 298 of 360 Tree Lighting Ceremony at City Hall (December 2022)
Attendees of the tree lighting event were asked: (1) How did you get here (to the event); and (2) where are your areas of concern and (3) what are your recommendations for safety improvements?

1. How did you get here (to the event)?
• Most respondents walked to the event; drivers were the next most represented group; with cyclists and transit riders making up the minority of arrivals.
• There was a mix of residents and non-residents participating. Since City Hall is close to the municipal border, many folks walked over from outside of the jurisdiction.
• Many folks (residents and non-residents alike) noted that they worked or attended school in the City of Maywood.

2. Where are your areas of safety concerns and recommendations for improvements?
• Participants commented on speeding vehicles as a major concern. Both on major thoroughfares like Slauson Avenue and neighborhood streets (esp. those near schools).
• One student noted a location where a car collided with him while he was bicycling.
• Folks identified the following desired improvements: (1) speed humps, (2) repairing bus shelters, (3) stop signs, (4) crossing guards near schools.
• Residents identified the following streets for safety improvements:

Fishburn Avenue., Maywood Avenue., Slauson Avenue., Pine Avenue., Gifford Avenue.

Poster polling attendees on which
mode of transportation they used to
get to event
Attendees providing input on locations
where they feel unsafe walking, biking, or
getting to transit
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 51 Page 299 of 360 Community Charrette #1 at Fishburn Avenue Elementary
School (February 2023)
PMJ Staff coordinated an after school community workshop to better understand how residents current get around and identify additional locations where parents and students feel unsafe walking, biking or getting to public transit. Approximately 25 parents and students participated in this workshop and most participants indicated either walking or biking to get to and from school.

Participants were asked to identify specific street segments, intersections, and blocks on a map of the city where they feel unsafe walking, biking, or getting to/from public transportation. Additionally, students and parents were asked to share their observations of what makes active transportation difficult in Maywood.

Speeding on residential streets, especially near schools, was raised as one the most common concerns and the following streets were identified as areas of concern:
• 53rd Street
• 54th Street
• 57th Street
• 58th Street
• Gifford Avenue
• Atlantic Boulevard
• Slauson Avenue
PMJ Staff engage with Fishburn Avenue Elementary School parents and students to determine areas of concern for pedesrians and cyclists throughout Maywood
PMJ Staff distribute flyers to parents to attend Community Charrette #1 Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 52 Page 300 of 360 Backpack and School Supply Distribution at the YMCA (August 2023) Attendees participated in an engagement exercise by voting “Yes”, “No”, or sharing other opinions about the proposed treatments. Facilitators from PMJ and EA introduced treatments on poster boards to participants, and then asked participants’ opinions about those treatments. Results were recorded visually, and additional comments were compiled on the poster boards.

There was a good turnout of all ages, but especially parents and their children. We heard from young people, elders, parents and students, some monolingual Spanish-speaking people, with others bilingual or English speaking only. Participants were supportive of most interventions and support for bike intersection treatments was very positive. Participants were more split around speed humps and the bicycle route.

Proposed Roadway Improvements feedback poster indicates strong community support for Edge Line, Curb Extenion, and Speed Hump treatments
PMJ and EA Staff engaging event attendees
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 53 Page 301 of 360 Mobile Food Pantry at the YMCA (August 2023)
Attendees participated in an engagement exercise by voting “Yes”, “No”, or sharing other opinions about the proposed treatments. Facilitators from EA introduced treatments on poster boards and survey packets to participants, and then asked participants’ opinions about those treatments.

Turnout was lower than the Backpack and School Supply Distribution event, and most participants were older monolingual Spanish speakers. Community members were overwhelmingly supportive of more speed humps and high visibility crosswalks. They expressed concern around speeding vehicles, and we received many suggestions related to intersections and streets that could benefit from improvements. Because participants were engaged as they moved up in line, more participants took surveys (versus voting on poster boards).

Feedback from Mobile Food Pantry attendees on bicycle routes Feedback from Mobile Food Pantry attendees on curb extensions and speed humps
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 54 Page 302 of 360 Community Charrette #2 at Fishburn Avenue Elementary
School (October 2023)
EA Staff coordinated with Fishburn Avenue Elementary School Principal, Antonio Garcia, to collect feedback from parents, students, and members of the public during student afternoon pick-up. They explained the various proposed treatments on multiple poster boards and participants were asked to indicate whether or not they felt the recommendations would be beneficial to the community. Participants also had the option to provide general comments and feedback, which were recorded on the poster boards.

Participants provided strong support for all proposed treatments, especially for roadway treatments designed to slow down cars on residential streets where speeding is a chronic issues. A handful of parents shared that they would also appreciate crossing guards at Slauson Avenue and Fishburn Avenue to help parents and students safety cross Slauson Avenue during drop-off and pick-up times.

EA Staff listens to feedback from Fishburn Ave Elementrary School parents during student pick-up
EA Staff guides a parent through the various proposed pedestrian and bike safety treatments around the city
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 55 Page 303 of 360 Maywood ATP Community Advisory Committee
A Community Advisory Committee (CAC) was established to satisfy Task 2.1 as outlined in the Project Scope to help guide the project team better understand the people of Maywood, their transportation needs, and how to prioritize potential treatments. KOA and EA coordinated a committee of six community ambassadors and scheduled two meetings throughout the course of the project to consult their feedback. • Roberto Bustillo - Communities for a Better Environment • Antonio Garcia - Fishburn Elementary School Principal • Alberto Espiricueta - East Yard Communities
• William Downing - Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) • Andrea Aguilar - Southeast Rio Vista YMCA
• Eric Maceda - Rivers for Action
First Maywood ATP CAC Meeting
The first Maywood ATP CAC meeting took place on January 30, 2022, from 4pm to 5pm over Zoom. EA facilitated this meeting with assistance from KOA to present its initial technical findings. The meeting agenda was as follows:
• Welcome & Introductions
• Overview of the Project and Role of the Advisory Commitee • Existing Conditions Overview
• Discussion: Areas of Concern in the City
• Next Steps & Open Comment
• Adjourn
Committee members participated in two different exercises: (1) giving feedback and reactions to the existing conditions memo and (2) discussing areas of concern around the city via Jamboard. Reactions and feedback from committee members were related to general perceptions of safety, safety around schools, bicycle safety, and pedestrian safety & accessibility.

General Perceptions of Safety
The number of traffic incidents around Maywood is alarming to some, and generally has contributed to the perception that Maywood’s streets can be unsafe.

Around Slauson and Fishburn, families have raised concerns around personal safety. The lack of lighting around Fishburn’s school site makes community members who walk feel especially unsafe. On the other hand, some people enjoy walking around the school and consider the area to be safer than other areas (including local parks) where gang activities are common.

Safety Around Schools
Traffic around schools can get chaotic during the afternoon pickup window, but many schools do not have volunteers/crossing guards to direct traffic during those times. Crossing guards have helped with traffic management around schools, particularly by managing the flow of car, bike, and pedestrian traffic around elementary and middle schools during pick-up & drop-off times.

Bicycle Safety
Protected bike lanes could help increase commuter safety, particularly when crossing high traffic and conflict zone areas like the train tracks on Atlantic Boulevard.

The lack of bike lanes could alleviate the issue of folks riding bikes in the opposite direction of traffic or on the sidewalk, which brings cyclists into conflict with cars or pedestrians.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 56 Page 304 of 360 Pedestrian Safety & Accessibility
Crossing guards and infrastructure that prioritizes pedestrian safety would make people feel more comfortable walking around Maywood. Among vulnerable road users, those that are older and have accessibility needs feel particularly unsafe. Elderly folks are not being given a long enough walk signal at large intersections like Slauson and Atlantic, and other intersections struggle with accommodating differently abled pedestrians.

Second Maywood ATP CAC Meeting
The second Maywood ATP CAC meeting took place on July 31, 2023, from 4pm to 5pm over Zoom. EA facilitated the presentation with assistance from KOA to present its initial list of potential active transportation treatments. Staff from the City of Maywood were also in attendance to observe CAC feedback. The meeting agenda was as follows:
• Welcome & Meeting Goals
• Recap of Project Timeline
• Presentation of Recommendations
• Open Comment
• Next Steps & Wrap-Up
• Adjourn
Community members provided feedback on the presentation of recommendations in the form of a Jamboard session. The proposed interventions seemed to resonate with members, with a few folks asking additional questions.

Members felt that concerns around accessibility and elder-friendly design were addressed with leading pedestrian intervals and other parts of the plan. One member appreciated the speed humps for Fishburn Avenue Elementary and Loma Vista Avenue Elementary. Another shared that wayfinding signs in English and Spanish would be helpful.

Some questions that were raised after hearing the presentation that were addressed in part by the KOA team, which included:
• Will there be safety improvements on Slauson?
• The Maywood ATP project staff did look at Slauson and Atlantic. The proposal is to provide bicycle and pedestrian improvements along parallel corridors.

In the report, they will include that the city should improve their exploration of alternative corridors. • Any opportunity to include a driver education campaign to make drivers aware of cyclist and pedestrian rights? • There are plans to increase signage through wayfinding and funs are available for City-run public campaigns Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 57 Page 305 of 360

RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER 5

This chapter identifies recommended citywide bicycle and pedestrian-network treatments. Treatment recommendations were informed after conducting an indepth level of traffic stress analysis which observed a combination of variables including street traffic volume, crash history, and street width to identify candidate segments and intersections in most need of safety improvements (Appendix A).

The projects outlined here will provide the City with a comprehensive list of treatments that will play a major role in closing gaps, addressing existing deficiencies, and provide entirely new non-motorized treatments. The facility implementation for each has no specific time frame as available funding is generally limited.

However, in later chapters, the report will guide implementation by ranking all projects, by corridor or general proximity. This will provide the City with a framework where several elements of the ATP can be earmarked for implementation or used in funding applications.

Bike Network Facility Recommendations
The City and project team proposed a series of bicycle facilities with the goal of better connecting destinations within and outside the city. The goal was to create facilities where they do not exist and expand connections to existing high-quality facilities, such as the regional bicycle paths along the Los Angeles River. 00 0.25 .5
Miles
Multi-Directional Sign
Maywood Destinations Bike Facility Recommendations
City Hall
Library
School
Park
Single Direction Sign
Bike Route Network
Local Bike Networks
City of Bell Proposed Network
City of Huntington Park
Proposed Network
Legend
Basemap
Los Angeles
River Bike Path
Los Angeles River Bike
Path Entrance
N/S or E/W Directional Sign
Gateway Sign
FIGURE 15: PROPOSED BICYCLE NETWORK AND WAYFINDING FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 59 Page 307 of 360 Bicycle Route & Wayfinding Signage, Source: NACTO
Class III: Bicycle Routes
Bicycle routes are in-road bicycle facilities that share the travel lane with vehicles. They are typically installed along low-speed, locally-serving streets that do not experience high vehicle speeds or extensive traffic. The main role of such facilities is to provide additional gap closures and connections to bicycle facilities or destinations along roadways where bicyclists can safely and comfortably share the road with vehicles. Typical best practices recommend that such facilities be accompanied by traffic-calming measures, such as speed humps and signage, to maintain low vehicle speeds.

Shared Lane pavement Markings (also referred to as Sharrows) are usually installed along these routes to signify the bicycle route. The pavement markings provide motorists with a visual cue that bicyclists can take the lane.

For the Maywood ATP, bicycle routes were the main option considered for the City’s proposed bike network. Maywood’s narrow residential streets and restrictions on Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard did not provide the necessary width clearance to safely install protected bike lane and dedicated bike paths in Maywood. The proposed bike routes are recommended on streets with lower traffic volumes and vehicle speeds – mostly focused along residential streets parallel to high volume corridors and that connect to schools, parks, and other regional and local bike networks. 58th Street
Bicycle Network
Miles
Riverfront
Park
City Hall
Library

0.5 0.5

0.5 One direction
Option A
Maywood
Moves
Network
58th Street
Bicycle Network
Miles
City Hall
Library

0.75 0.75
Bike Network
Maywood
Moves
Bicycle Network
IdentifIcAtion Directional
Multi-directional
Gateway N/S or E/W Directional
Network Wayfinding
Another major goal of the Maywood ATP is to connect bicycle users to destinations within the City and to those in neighboring jurisdictions. One way to provide further local and regional access to bicyclists is by installing wayfinding signage along the proposed bicycle network at both mid-block and at key intersections. Wayfinding signage helps augment bike networks by providing both cyclists and pedestrians directions to key destinations, directing foot and bike traffic away from busy corridors to calmer residential streets, and deterring speeding by using visual cues for drivers to slow down and share the road.

Rendering of potential Maywood Moves wayfinding signage Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 60 Page 308 of 360 Bicycle Intersection Facility Recommendations
The projects included in this chapter are newly recommended bicycle facilities, as the City currently does not have any exisitng bicycle facilities installed at signalized intersections. Recommended projects are presented in the following pages and are organized by facility type. The accompanying map (Figure 16) identifies all facility types, their location, and extent.

FIGURE 16: PROPOSED BICYCLE INTERSECTION FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 00 0.25 .5
Miles
Multi-Way Stop
Maywood Destinations Bike Facility Recommendations
City Hall
Library
School
Park
Bike Intersection Treatments
Bike Route Network
Local Bike Networks
City of Bell Proposed Network
City of Huntington Park
Proposed Network
Legend
Basemap
Los Angeles
River Bike Path
Los Angeles River Bike
Path Entrance
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 61 Page 309 of 360 Bike Intersection Signage, Source: NACTO
Bike Crossing Treatments
Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard are high-speed, high-volume corridors that also serve as critical truck routes that run through the heart of Maywood.

Eight intersections along these two corridors were identified to install a combination of bike intersection treatments to enhance the safety, comfortability, and convenience of cyclists along the proposed Bike Route Network. The current configuration of these intersection provides little to no guidance or assistance for cyclists sharing the road with vehicles, which can dissuade some residents from using a bike to complete short, local trips.

Bicycle Push Buttons, clearly marked Bike Loop Detectors, and Bike Intersection Signage were recommended as bike intersection safety treatments to enhance the proposed Bike Route Network. These elements help improve cyclist safety by establishing specific locations for bikes to wait and request green lights without cluttering walkways.

Bicycle Push Button, Source: NACTO Bike Loop Detector, Source: NACTO Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 62 Page 310 of 360 Rendering of potential Multi-Way Stop at intersection of 55th St & Everett St, Source: KOA Multi-Way Stops
Although Maywood has an extensive network of narrow residential streets, there are a handful of conflict zones at key intersections along the proposed Bike Route network. Eight intersections were identified in which traffic moving east/west is required to stop and yield before crossing, while traffic moving north/south is allowed to travel straight through without having to stop. This current configuration places an additional layer of stress on all users traveling in the east/west direction by having to anticipate oncoming traffic from the north/south and increases the chances of potential collisions.

Multi-Way Stops can be used an an effective traffic calming element to enhance the proposed Bike Route Network. When all traffic stops at an intersection, cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists alike are able to safely navigate unsignalized intersections. Additionally, Multi-Way Stops help mitigate speeding - a key concern raised by Maywood residents during community outreach. These treatments help reinforce selected streets as dedicated Bike Routes that make riding a bike a more convenient and enjoyable experience.

Traffic counts and collision history studies were collected at each identified intersection to determine if Multi-Way Stops were warranted according to MUTCD criteria. All eight locations did not meet the minimum required collision and and traffic volumes. However, MUTCD guidelines for Multi-Way Stops also provide additional optional criteria. Section 2B.07 Option D states that “An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection” can also be considered in an engineering study to determined if a Multi-Way Stop is warranted at an intersection. The Maywood ATP recommends that a future engineering study be conducted to determine that these treatments are warranted, meet local and state guidelines, and do not significantly impact neighborhood traffic flow.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 63 Page 311 of 360 Pedestrian Facility Recommendations
As part of the Plan development process, the City and project team outlined pedestrian-oriented treatments that will improve existing pedestrian facilities to make Maywood a more comfortable and safer place to walk. Currently, the City has an extensive supply of sidewalks along its major arterials and residential streets.

Community outreach identified that speeding and unsafe crossings are a major issue.

As such, the Plan focused on the following enhancements:
• Enhance the pedestrian experience by installing Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) treatments at key signalized intersections along Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard to give residents more time to comfortably and safely cross high volume corridors
• Improve pedestrian safety by re striping existing crosswalks with High Visibility Crosswalks at key signalized intersections along Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard to make pedestrians more visible to motorists from farther away compared to traditional crosswalks
Recommended projects are presented in the following pages and are organized by facility type. The accompanying map (Figure 17) identifies all facility types, their location, and extent.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 64 Page 312 of 360 FIGURE 17: PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN INTERSECTION FACILITY IMPROVEMENT 00 0.25 .5
Miles
Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
Maywood Destinations Pedestrian Facility Recommendations City Hall
Library
School
Park
High-Visibility Crosswalk
City of Maywood Proposed
Network
Local Bike Route Networks
City of Bell Proposed Network
City of Huntington Park
Proposed Network
Legend
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River Bike
Path Entrance
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 65 Page 313 of 360 Leading Pedestrian Intervals
According to community feedback, many residents indicated that they feel they do not have enough time to cross Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard, especially older residents. On average, pedestrians are required to walk 70 to 80 ft between four to five lanes of traffic to get from one side of the street to the other. These long crossing distances place pedestrians and cyclists at risk when trying to cross these major corridors. Additionally, the majority of pedestrian collisions in Maywood occur while a pedestrian is crossing the street at an intersection.

LPI treatments help provide pedestrians with additional time to safely cross the street before traffic begins to move at an intersection. These devices typically provide between 3-7 seconds of extra time dedicated to walkers before the signal turns green. The Maywood ATP recommends installing LPI devices all signalized intersections along Slauson Avenue for north/south approaches only and all signalized intersections along Atlantic Boulevard for east/west approaches only. That way, pedestrians are granted the benefit of additional crossing time for the longest crossing distances and vehicle wait time for traffic traveling along the two corridors remains largely unaffected.

High Visibility Crosswalks
According to Maywood collision data, the most frequent pedestrian action at the time of a vehicle collision is when someone is crossing the street at an intersection.

High Visibility Crosswalks provide motorists with more defined visual cues that they are approaching a dedicated crossing facility, providing pedestrians with an extra layer of safety and peace of mind while crossing the street. These treatments pair well with LPI devices because they can been seen by drivers from further distances away to provide ample time to slowdown as they approach an intersection. The Maywood ATP recommends installing High Visibility Crosswalks at all signalized intersections along Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard, as well as other key unsignalized intersections with more than four approaches or near popular community activity hubs such as the local YMCA and Riverfront Park.

Example of LPI indicating pedestrians to cross before traffic is allowed to move Rendering of potential High Visibility Crosswalk at intersection of Slauson Ave & Pine Ave Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 66 Page 314 of 360 Roadway Facility Recommendations
As part of the Maywood ATP development process, the City and project team outlined street-oriented treatments that will help reduce speeding to make Maywood a more comfortable and safer place to walk and bike alongside traffic. Currently, the City has an extensive network of narrow residential streets with low posted speed limits.

However, community outreach identified speeding as one of the most prominent hazards pedestrians and cyclists experience. As such, the Plan focused on the following enhancements:
• Reduce speeding on neighborhood streets by installing speed humps on streets located on the proposed bicycle route network, especially near sensitive uses such as schools
• Reduce speeding on neighborhood streets by installing edge line treatments on wide residential roads to minimize the total width of the road to discourage fast driving
• Reduce speeding on neighborhood streets by bumping out the curb on key intersections along Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard to slow cars down as they enter narrower residential streets on the proposed bicycle route network
Recommended projects are presented in the following pages and are organized by facility type. The accompanying map (Figure 18) identifies all facility types, their location, and extent.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 67 Page 315 of 360 FIGURE 18: PROPOSED ROADWAY FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Speed Humps
Maywood Destinations Roadway Facility Recommendations
City Hall
Library
School
Park
Edge Line Treatment
City of Maywood ProposedNetwork
Local Bike Route Networks
City of Bell Proposed Network
City of Huntington Park
Proposed Network
Legend
Basemap
Los Angeles River
Bike Path
Los Angeles River Bike
Path Entrance
Curb Exension
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 68 Page 316 of 360 Speed Humps
According to community feedback, residents indicated that they feel speeding on neighborhood streets is a major issue especially around schools like Fishburn Avenue Elementary School.

Speed Humps provide a solution to slow cars down while also providing minimal impacts to cyclists also using the same roadway. The Maywood ATP recommends that a future engineering study be conducted to determine if installing Speed Humps at the proposed locations is warranted according to the city’s Speed Hump Policy and will not significantly impact residential traffic flow. These streets were identified as having chronic speeding issues and are located near local schools where many children walk. The proposed locations are located along the Proposed Maywood Bike Route Network, would provide additional safety benefits to cyclists, and are not on existing dedicated truck or transit routes.

Additional Bicycle Facility Considerations:

Edge Line Treatment
Edge Line Treatments also help address the issue of speeding by creating minimally invasive visual cues to narrow the width of the street for drivers and reducing the street space dedicated for vehicle traffic. The Maywood ATP recommends that a future engineering study be conducted to determine if Edge Line Treatments are warranted at the proposed street segments and not significantly impact residential traffic flow. Many of these segments were identified along streets were speeding is common, near sensitive uses like schools, and along on Maywood’s widest residential streets.

Example of potential Speed Cushion treatment Rendering of potential Edge Line Treatment along 55th St Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 69 Page 317 of 360 Curb Extensions
To further reduce speeding on residential streets, the Maywood ATP recommends a future engineering study be conducted to determine if Curb Extensions along key intersections along Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard are warranted and will not significantly impact traffic along Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard.

Curb Extensions help slow down cars as they enter a specific approach at an intersection and are typically used to slow down cars as they travel from highvolume, high-speed streets to slower, narrower residential streets. The proposed treatment locations illustrated in Figure 18 are located along key intersections along the proposed Maywood Bike Route Network and on streets known for speeding. The goal of this treatment would be to Example of potential Speed Cushion treatment
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 70 Page 318 of 360 Regional Connectivity Recommendations
As part of the Maywood ATMP development process, the City and project team outlined street-oriented treatments that will help improve walk an bike connectivity to neighboring jurisdictions and the Los Angeles River Bicycle Trail. Currently, the City has few comfortable options for pedestrians and cyclists traveling from Maywood to Huntington Park, Vernon, and the Los Angeles River. As such, the Plan focused on the following enhacements to improve connections to those areas.

FIGURE 19: EXISTING CONDITIONS AT SLAUSON AVENUE &

MAYWOOD AVENUE
FIGURE 20: PROPOSED REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS

AT SLAUSON AVENUE & MAYWOOD AVENUE
The proposed changes at the intersection of Slauson Avenue & Maywood Avenue are designed to provide pedestrians with safer connections between Maywood, the City of Huntington Park. This regional connectivity project would remove the dedicated right turn lane on the southern approach of Slauson Avenue & Maywood Avenue and replace it with additional waiting space for pedestrians to create a more welcoming entrance from Maywood’s southwest border. The Maywood ATP recommends that a detailed engineering study be conducted in partnership with the City of Huntington Park to determine if this project is warranted, complies with existing state and local guidelines, and does not significantly impact traffic along Slauson Avenue.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 71 Page 319 of 360 FIGURE 21: EXISTING CONDITIONS AT DISTRICT BOULEVARD &

ATLANTIC BOULEVARD
FIGURE 22: PROPOSED REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS

AT DISTRICT BOULEVARD & ATLANTIC BOULEVARD
The proposed changes at the intersection of District Boulevard & Atlantic Boulevard are designed to provide cyclists and pedestrians with safer connections between Maywood, the City of Vernon and the Los Angeles River Bicycle Trail. This regional connectivity project would:
• Re stripe the existing crosswalks on the southern and eastern approaches of District Boulevard & Atlantic Boulevard to improve pedestrian visibility • Install a new high visibility crosswalk on the eastern approach of 52nd St & Atlantic Boulevard to improve pedestrian visibility • Remove the exclusive right turn lane on the eastern approach of District Boulevard & Atlantic Boulevard to provide more space for cyclists and pedestrians • Extend curb space on the southwest corner of District Boulevard & Atlantic Boulevard to reduce the total crossing distance for cyclists and pedestrians • Install a dedicated bike lane from 52nd Street to the southeast corner of District Boulevard & Atlantic Boulevard to provide cyclists with safer connections to and from the proposed Maywood Bike Network
The Maywood ATP recommends that a detailed engineering study be conducted in partnership with the City of Vernon to determine if this project is warranted, complies with existing state and local guidelines, and does not significantly impact traffic along Atlantic Boulevard.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 72 Page 320 of 360 Non-Infrastructure Recommendations
The City and project team also outlined a series of programs to accompany the list of physical infrastructure treatments. The goal of these programs is to help shift away from the existing vehicle-centric transportation behavior in Maywood by:
• Familiarizing residents to the new active transportation infrastructure changes to their community
• Encouraging residents to explore using active transportation modes in their regular routines
• Educating residents on how to safely walk, bike, and drive throughout Maywood’s street network
Encouragement and Safety Programs
Encouragement programs are a form of transportation demand management (TDM) as it relates to active transportation. Increased familiarity with active transportation might have positive impacts on active transportation uses within the City and region.

The following programs can be organized and deployed to spur new demand for active transit modes in Maywood.

Citywide Bike Map
Maps with bicycle routes serve as an encouragement and educational tool. As recreational and utilitarian riders alike seek optimal routes throughout the City a bike map can encourage and facilitate this process in a positive way. These maps can be distributed at public facilities throughout the City, at local bike shops, as well as on key intersections along the proposed bike network. These maps can also be made available for download on the City website.

Network Wayfinding
Another tool to encourage more active transportation trips is to install wayfinding signage along the proposed bicycle network at both mid-block and at key intersections. Wayfinding signage help augment physical bike networks by providing cyclists and pedestrians directions to key destinations, and provide motorists with additional visual cues to slow down and share the road. Directional signage at the neighborhood level helps residents, employees, and students better understand how to connect with nearby destinations by foot or bike and help support first last mile connectivity.

Suggested Routes to School Maps
In addition to Citywide Bike Maps, the City of Maywood can explore developing informational maps that show the boundaries of each school and identify suggested routes for parents and students to safely walk or bike to school.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 73

Walking School Bus/Bicycle Trains
Walking school buses and bicycle trains are organized walking and bicycling groups, respectively, where adults “pick up” walkers and bicyclists along specific routes to school at specific locations. This way, children are supervised during their travel to school and are taught how to safely travel via alternative travel modes from a young age.

Senior Walking Clubs
Senior walking clubs can be organized to encourage seniors to walk in groups and exercise at a pace and location comfortable to the participants. Walking clubs help seniors connect with others who share similar schedules and hobbies.

Bike to Work Day
Bike to Work Day, held in May, is a nation-wide event that encourages biking to work. The City of Maywood can encourage residents, employers, and students to participate in Bike to Work Day. Rallies can be held to promote bicycling and highlight new or improved bikeways within the City. Local bike shops can organize booths to teach people about bike equipment, safety, and maintenance. City staff can consider supplementary “Bike to Work Day” events throughout the year.

Conduct Surveys
The success of various bicycling and walking programs as well as bicycle facilities can be measured by public surveys. Surveys can be distributed every few years to determine if public perceptions or behaviors have changed over a certain period – or if efforts need to be redirected. Questions can build off those used during the second community outreach survey or structured around project-specific feedback goals.

Education Programs
Educational programs for all roadway users can help prevent potential collisions. Possible program partnerships between the city, the school district, parent teacher organizations, community leaders, and organizations are outlined below:

Community and Parent Workshops
Community and parent workshops are provided by the City’s Public Safety and Planning Division to engage the community on the importance and the benefits of bicycle and pedestrian safety. Workshops address concerns of traffic speed and traffic volume around schools, identify the benefits of bicycling, and encourage parents to allow their children to bike and walk to school.

Community Bicycle Helmet Program
The City’s Public Safety officers and staff educate the community on the proper use and fit of bicycle helmets. Public Safety staff provides inspections at community events to ensure that helmets fit properly. Studies of children and adolescents aged four to eighteen years found that 96% of helmets were incorrectly fitted. This program would support the distribution of helmets to students and community members participating in bicycle rodeos.

Student Workshops, Assemblies and Rodeos
Maywood’s Public Safety Department in conjunction with Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E), provide elementary and middle schools with student workshops and assemblies. Officers emphasize smart routes to bicycle safety, the do’s and don’ts, measures to protect against theft, and participate in riding them to school as a chaperone. D.A.R.E officers explain bicycle safety and helmet law to 5th-grade curriculum. Middle school programs build upon the elementary program, include more involved and interactive experiences. Students are given bicycle license applications and D.A.R.E. officers make themselves available on a specified school day to register bicycles and talk to students. The program establishes positive relationships between students and law enforcement, teachers, parents, and other community leaders.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 74 Page 322 of 360

NEXT STEPS
CHAPTER 6

Project Prioritization
The prioritization analysis provides guidance to the City of Maywood and other agencies as to which projects will provide the greatest potential benefit to citywide mobility.

While higher ranking projects should generally be implemented before lower ranking ones, the City may choose to advance specific projects for other interests or as funds become available.

Additional analyses should be conducted periodically to account for any significant changes in the local population, the environment, and the transportation network.

In order to ease prioritization and implementation, the Maywood ATP has structured all proposed improvements by the street. This allows the City to package streets and the bicycle and pedestrian improvements located along them as separate “mini-projects” that can then be used to submit for funding.

The project prioritization model was developed with considerations to four key categories:

The project prioritization model was developed with considerations to four key categories:
• Need and Equity – Measures each project’s impact on the most vulnerable members of the community
• Safety – Evaluates a project’s potential impact on walking and bicycling safety in the City • Community Support – Considers the level of community support for each project • Network Connectivity – Quantifies each project’s potential impact on walking and bicycling behaviors in the City and connections to local and regional attractors The specific measures for each category are shown in Table 12. Weighting factors were adjusted to provide higher prioritization on some criteria than others based on safety, community input, and general consistency with the ATP goals. The assigned weights determine an overall cumulative score that balances benefits to potential users and overall implementation feasibility.

The prioritization scores and ranking table (Table 13) provides a list of the prioritized projects and a breakdown of each cumulative score by ranking criteria.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 76 Page 324 of 360 TABLE 12: PROJECT PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA MATRIX
Group Category Description Weight Category Weight
Commute by Walk Percentage of households within a 200 ft area of the corridor that primarily commute by foot.

Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5
Low Vehicle Access Percentage of households that have no vehicles available within a 200 ft area of each corridor.

Source: 2020 ACS estimates 5
Commute by Bike Percentage of households within 200 ft area of each corridor that primarily commute by bike.

Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5
Commute by Transit Percentage of households within 200 ft area of each corridor according that primarily commute by taking public transit. Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5 Median Household Income The average median household income for the 200 ft surrounding each corridor. Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5
Safety Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions The total count of bicycle and pedestrian- involved collisions within a 200 ft area of each corridor. Source: TIMS, years 2017 - 2021. 35 35
Community Feedback Areas of Concern
Street segments identified by residents as unsafe for walking, biking and accessing public transit from Community Feedback and collected feedback from first two community touch points.
25 25
Potential Pedestrian Use The total number of residents living within a 200 ft of each corridor. Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5
Transit Accessibility The count of local and regional stops located within a 200 ft area of each corridor. 5 Nearby Attractors The count of local and regional stops located within a 200 ft area of each corridor. 5 Total Score 100 100
Network Connectivity 15
Need and Equity 25
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 77 Page 325 of 360 TABLE 13: PROJECT RANKINGS BY CORRIDOR
Corridor Name
Median
Household
Income
Pecentage of
Workers Over
16 Commute
by Bike
Pecentage of
Workers Over
16 Commute
by Walking
Pecentage of
Workers Over 16
Commute by
Public Transit
Percentage of
Households
with Zero
Vehicle Access
Census
Block
Population
Total Bike
and Ped
Collisions
Per Corridor
Total Nearby
Attractors
Total Transit
Stops
Community
Input Total Score
Slauson Ave 2.76 2.83 0.85 2.53 3.07 2.41 35.00 5.00 5.00 25.00 84.44 Pine Ave 3.66 2.47 2.06 0.72 5.00 0.97 12.89 3.00 0.31 25.00 56.09 Atlantic Blvd 2.76 1.37 0.72 1.55 4.14 2.20 20.26 2.50 1.09 14.29 50.89 53rd St 4.66 2.71 4.21 3.82 3.83 3.13 3.68 1.00 0.31 21.43 48.78 Carmelita Ave 4.56 5.00 2.56 4.95 3.66 3.79 1.84 0.50 0.47 21.43 48.76 58th St 2.94 3.10 0.64 3.06 3.41 2.66 3.68 3.50 0.16 25.00 48.14 Gifford Ave 3.40 4.98 3.09 5.00 3.70 3.70 0.00 0.50 0.00 21.43 45.80 52nd St 3.25 3.18 5.00 3.69 3.48 3.10 0.00 0.50 0.31 21.43 43.94 55th St 5.00 3.08 2.86 3.69 3.79 2.97 0.00 0.00 0.47 21.43 43.29 Everett Ave 4.31 2.29 3.02 3.74 3.06 3.57 0.00 0.50 0.16 14.29 34.94 King Ave 2.33 0.58 0.08 2.80 2.59 2.77 0.00 0.50 0.47 17.86 29.98 59th Pl 3.23 3.02 1.51 1.59 1.31 3.64 3.68 4.00 0.16 0.00 22.13 61st St 3.19 3.04 1.46 1.09 1.54 3.18 0.00 1.00 0.16 7.14 21.80 Woodlawn Ave 4.50 4.96 2.66 0.39 0.02 3.73 0.00 1.00 0.31 3.57 21.14 Alamo Ave 2.96 4.73 2.52 0.32 0.00 4.68 0.00 1.00 1.25 3.57 21.04 Heliotrope Circle 2.19 0.88 0.25 2.89 2.57 1.60 3.68 1.00 0.31 3.57 18.94 Maywood Ave 0.95 0.00 2.50 2.09 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 10.71 18.65 57th St 1.04 0.00 0.00 3.48 3.81 2.38 0.00 0.50 0.16 7.14 18.50 60th St 3.89 4.94 2.64 0.52 0.08 4.64 0.00 1.50 0.16 0.00 18.37 Walker Ave 2.80 4.78 2.54 0.33 0.00 5.00 0.00 1.00 0.16 0.00 16.61 Mayflower Ave 1.04 0.00 0.00 3.48 3.81 2.38 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.57 14.77 Randolph St 0.00 1.79 0.65 0.00 0.49 0.28 5.53 1.50 0.31 3.57 14.12 Prospect Ave 2.73 1.35 0.22 2.21 1.26 4.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.90 Heliotrope Ave 3.63 2.91 1.27 1.36 0.69 1.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.29 Vinevale Ave 2.74 1.36 0.22 2.21 1.26 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.99 Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 78 Page 326 of 360 Cost Estimates
Unit costs for planning cost estimates are derived from KOA’s extensive experience in providing engineering services to communities across Southern California.

Cost assumptions include considerations for design, environmental, construction management, mobilization, and traffic control in order to provide as accurate of a cost for implementation as possible. While other project-specific factors such as grading, acquisition costs, or landscaping may increase the actual cost of construction, an additional 25 percent contingency has been added to each project to account for these factors that may arise during the design phase.

Table 13 provides projected total cost for each street to install all proposed treatments along that street. For example, the Grand Total for 58th Street includes all projected costs to implement the Speed Humps, Multi-Way Stops, High Visibility Crosswalks, Bike Route segments, and Edgeline Treatments outlined in Chapter 5 that would be located along the street. Project costs are estimated to reflect the actual cost of construction as accurately as possible, based on 2023 dollars. As the City pursues funding for these projects, it should be noted that construction costs may fluctuate based on when funding actually becomes available.

TABLE 14: PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY BY CORRIDOR
Corridor Grand Total
Atlantic Blvd $ 2,757,049
Slauson Ave $ 2,630,598
52nd St $ 383,236
58th St $ 197,304
53rd St $ 186,302
59th Pl $ 167,122
Randolph St $ 114,436
King Ave $ 76,345
55th St $ 75,025
60th St $ 71,461
Wayfinding Program $ 40,870
Alamo Ave $ 39,950
Walker Ave $ 34,073
Pine Ave $ 29,986
Heliotrope Ave $ 26,872
Prospect Ave $ 26,872
Vinevale Ave $ 26,913
Heliotrope Circle $ 15,939
Carmelita Ave $ 8,035
61st St $ 7,896
Everett Ave $ 7,471
Gifford Ave $ 7,471
Woodlawn Ave $ 2,820
57th St $ 846
Mayflower Ave $ 564
Maywood Ave $ 564
TOTAL $ 6,936,021
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 79 Page 327 of 360 APPENDIX A: LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS ANALYSIS

LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS AND LEVEL OF COMFORT ANALYSIS
Background:

Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) and pedestrian Level of Comfort (LOC) analyses are the transportation industry’s best practices for measuring the comfort and convenience of pedestrian and bicycle networks at all scales. The Maywood Active Transportation Plan calls for analyses of the current walkway, street segment, and intersection conditions throughout the city to identify potential locations to introduce low-stress connectivity treatments. These results will be compared with community input, census data, collision data, land use data, and transportation networks to justify recommendations to expand active transportation facilities throughout the city.

Developing the scoring criteria for a traffic stress analysis depends on the thoroughness and availability of local data. This means while there are common data inputs, methodologies are usually tailored for each project. Data inputs for a bike LTS analysis typically include roadway speed, average daily traffic volumes (ADT), number of vehicle lanes, and presence of existing bicycle facilities. Similarly, a pedestrian LOC analysis will typically include the same data inputs with the addition of sidewalk conditions, assessment of planting buffers, and crossing distances at intersections. By weighing each data input in a unique matrix, a roadway segment, walkway, or intersection can be assigned a rank ranging from 1 to 4, with 4 being the highest level of stress and the least comfortable for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS):

Methodology
The stress that people experience while biking varies from person to person and depends on local street network conditions. Some riders are comfortable riding alongside dense fast-moving traffic, while others prefer not to ride their bike at all. Individuals will generally identify with one of the four main preference groups, often called the “Four Types of Cyclists”, originally developed by Roger Geller at the City of Portland, Oregon in 2005:
• Strong & Fearless: On average, 2 – 7 percent of people are willing to ride their bicycle no matter what the roadway and traffic conditions are. For the individuals in this group, riding a bike is a strong part of their identity. • Enthused & Confident: On average, 5 – 15 percent of people are somewhat comfortable riding their bicycles alongside vehicular traffic. For the individuals in this group, they would prefer riding their bicycles within dedicated bike facilities. • Interested but Concerned: On average, 36 – 60 percent of people enjoy riding their bike but do not use them as much as they would like due to unsafe riding conditions. For the individuals in this group, they would feel inclined to ride more if they felt safer riding on their local roadways. • No Way No How: On average, 25 – 48 percent of people do not prefer riding a bike in any capacity. For the individuals in this group, they are either uncomfortable, uninterested, or physically unable to ride a bicycle.

The “Interested but Concerned” category represents the largest group of individuals who are able and most likely to ride a bike. Incentivizing these users to increase their share of bike trips typically requires streets with low traffic speeds and volumes, dedicated facilities, or a combination of both. The City of Maywood does not currently have any existing bicycle facilities; therefore, an LTS analysis was conducted on the city’s street network to determine the quality of current biking conditions and prioritize segments for future infrastructure improvements to increase bike ridership.

The “Interested but Concerned” category represents the largest group of individuals who are able and most likely to ride a bike. Incentivizing these users to increase their share of bike trips typically requires streets with low traffic speeds and volumes, dedicated facilities, or a combination of both. The City of Maywood does not currently have any existing bicycle facilities; therefore, an LTS analysis was conducted on the city’s street network to determine the quality of current biking conditions and prioritize segments for future infrastructure improvements to increase bike ridership.

The approach for this analysis was originally developed by the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) at San Jose University in 2012. The MTI’s most recent 2022 scoring criteria was specifically chosen because it accounts for riding conditions in mixed-use traffic, meaning bicyclists share the road alongside vehicles Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 81 Page 329 of 360 without dedicated lanes, which is the case in Maywood. The data inputs collected for this analysis include:
• Roadway speed
• ADT volumes
• Street width (number of lanes)
Bike LTS rank definitions are defined in Table 1. Each data input was independently weighted and added to the MTI LTS scoring matrix (Table 2).

Table 1 – Bicycle LTS Ranking Scheme
Level of Traffic Stress Description
LTS 1 Suitable for almost all ages and bicycling abilities LTS 2 Suitable for most adults
LTS 3 Suitable for more skilled and confident bicyclists LTS 4 Not suitable for most bicyclists
Table 2 – Bicycle LTS Scoring Matrix
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 82 Page 330 of 360 Pedestrian Level of Comfort (LOC):

Methodology
To supplement the bicycle LTS analysis and help identify ideal corridors for pedestrian improvements, a pedestrian LOC analysis was also conducted. The data inputs for this analysis include:
• Roadway speed
• ADT volumes
• Street width (number of lanes)
• Sidewalk conditions
• Presence of planted buffer between sidewalk and roadway This approach was originally developed by the Montgomery County Planning Department and has since been modified by KOA to meet the needs and context of the City of Maywood. Pedestrian LOC ranking definitions are defined in Table 3. The scoring matrices are divided into subsets based on the presence of sidewalks and roadway separations (Tables 4 to 12). Sidewalk separation is defined as the presence of a grass lawn or planted landscape area that horizontally separates a sidewalk from the road. ADT volume classes are defined based on the estimated traffic volumes by street class from the city’s Transportation Element:
• Low ADT: Volume less than 10,000 vehicles per day
• Medium ADT: Volume between 10,001 and 24,999 vehicles per day • High ADT: Volume greater than or equal to 25,000 vehicles per day Each data input was independently weighted and added to the pedestrian LOC scoring matrices.

Table 3 – Pedestrian LOC Ranking Scheme
Level of Traffic Stress Description
LTS 1 Suitable for almost all ages and bicycling abilities LTS 2 Suitable for most adults
LTS 3 Suitable for more skilled and confident bicyclists LTS 4 Not suitable for most bicyclists
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 83 Page 331 of 360 TABLE 7: TABLE 8: TABLE 9:

TABLE 10: TABLE 11: TABLE 12:

TABLE 4: TABLE 5: TABLE 6:

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 84 Page 332 of 360 Intersection Level of Comfort (LOC) Assessment
Methodology
An intersection LOC analysis is a point-based model that measures stress levels that people experience while using crosswalks and/or other designated crossing facilities. Intersection LOC scores were assigned to each of Maywood’s 163 intersections within its city limits to identify areas most difficult to navigate on foot and prioritize specific intersections for upgrades to improve connectivity and safety conditions for active transportation users.

Two variables are utilized for calculating intersection LOC:
• Crossing distance (curb to curb)
• Roadway speed
Intersection LOC score descriptions are outlined in Table 13. The intersection LOC matrix weights an intersection’s crossing distance more heavily than the posted roadway speed because a pedestrian’s comfort level is affected more when having to cross longer distances between curb to curb rather than the speed of traffic going through the intersection. The comfort scoring matrix is provided in Table 14.

Table 13 – Intersection LOC Ranking Scheme
Level of Comfort Description
LOC 1 Suitable for almost all pedestrians, including children that are trained to safely cross intersections
LOC 2 Suitable for most adult pedestrians and older children with enhanced facility coverage and comfort
LOC 3 Suitable for most adult pedestrians and older children with little or no supervision within an intersection
LOC 4 Suitable for a limited population of pedestrians with limited facility support within an intersection
Table 14 – Intersection LOC Scoring Matrix
Posted Vehicle
Speed Limit (mph) Crossing Distance (Ft.)
< 30 35 - 70 > 80
<=25 1 2 3
30 2 3 4
>=35 3 3 4
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 85 Page 333 of 360 APPENDIX B: COMMUNITY OUTREACH COLLATERAL

Needs Assessment
Draft Plan
Final Plan
Plan Adoption
Tasks Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 2022 2023
Maywood
Active Transportation Plan
(Maywood moves)
Project Description
The Maywood Active Transportation Plan is a collaboration between the City of Maywood and its residents to promote safe, convenient options for walking, biking, and taking public transportation.

To achieve this vision, the City is preparing a roadmap of potential street treatments and policies to minimize the biggest barriers to getting around Maywood without a car. Input from residents and stakeholders will inform how the City identifies key issue areas and prioritizes funding for local projects to address the community’s needs.

Project Goals
The Maywood Active Transportation Plan aims to achieve the following goals for the City of Maywood to reduce personal vehicle trips:
• Provide safe and convenient connections to important local destinations including schools, commercial centers, and parks
• Enhance regional connectivity by improving connections to local public transit services and the Los Angeles River Bicycle Path
• Improve public health by promoting projects that incentivize recreational activity • Promote economic activity throughout Maywood
Project Timeline
Scan this QR code to visit our project website at: bit.ly/3XT44nN Questions? Email the project team at [email protected] Project Factsheet
HOW DID YOU GET HERE ToDAY?
¿Cómo Llegó hoy?
Instructions:

PLease place a sticker on which mode of transportation you used to get here today Instrucciones:
por favor Ponga una pegatina para indicar qué medio de transporte utilizó usted para llegar aquí hoy ?
WALK
Caminando
BIKE
Andando en bicicleta
BUS
Autobús
CAR
Vehículo

CARPOOL
Vehículo
Compartído
OTHER
Otro
Maywood RESIDENT
Residente de Maywood
Maywood VISITOR
Visitante de Maywood
How Did You Get Here Poster
The project factsheet provides a brief description of the project’s scope, goals, and projected timeline. This document was distributed at all outreach events and was provided in both English and Spanish.

This posterboard was developed to serve as both an ice-breaker and collect data on local travel behavior. Participants were asked to place a sticker on the corresponding mode they used to arrive to an outreach event.

Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 87 Page 335 of 360 Areas of Concern Poster
This poster was developed to collect specific geograhical data on specific corridors and intersections that residents felt were unsafe to walk or bike.

Participants were asked to identify dangerous locations on the map and were also able to provide written and verbal comments that were recorded by project staff in the “Safety Concerns” box on the right hand side of the poster.

Lugares de preocupación

AREAS OF CONCERN
Maywood academy high school
Maywood Avenue Park
Maywood Center for
enriched students fishburn elementary
Clemente charter
Heliotrope Avenue
Elementary
Maywood Elementary
St. Rose of Lima catholic School
Benito Juarez Park Loma Vista elementary
Pine Avenue Park
Maywood park
Riverfront Park E Slauson AVEnue
Loma vista Avenue
S maywood avenue
gifford avenue
atlantic boulevard
heliotrope avenue
Randolph Street
fruitland AVEnue
e 52nd drive
alamo AVEnue
E 56th Street
District Boulevard
Safety Concerns
Preocupaciónes de seguridad:

Instructions:

Please place a sticker on the map where you feel unsafe walking, biking, or taking public transportation
instrucciones:
por favor ponga una pegatina sobre el mapa donde usted se siente inseguro caminando, andando en bicicleta o tomando transporte público City Hall
Municipalidad
Park
Parque
Library
Biblioteca
School
Escuela
Place of Worship
Lugar de Adoración
Metro Bus Stop
Parada de autobús
Los Angeles River Bicycle Path Entrance
Entrada del Carril Bici del Río Los Ángeles
Los Angeles River Bicycle Path
Carril Bici del Río Los Ángeles
PIxely Park
Bike Network Recommendation Poster
This poster was developed to collect specific community feedback on the proposed city bicycle network and wayfinding signage. Participants were asked if they felt these treatments would be beneficial to the community and to place a sticker in the corresponding box indicating “yes” or “no.” Project staff also wrote down verbal comments for individuals that wanted to provide additional suggestions, comments, or improvements to the proposed treatments.

Proposed Treatments / Tratamientos Propuestos
Please let us know if you like the following treatments / Por favor, díganos si le gustan las siguientes mejoras
Yes / Sí No / No
Other Comments? /
¿Otros Comentarios?
Bicycle Route / Ruta de Bicicletas
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Wayfinding / Letros de Red Ciclista Yes / Sí No / No
Bike Network
Improvements /
Mejoras en la Red Ciclista
City of Bell
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Bell
Local Bike Networks /
Redes de Bicicletas
Locales
City of Huntington Park
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Huntington Park
Existing Context /
Contexto Actual
Los Angeles River Bike
Path /
Carril Bici del Río Los
Ángeles
Los Angeles River Bike
Path Entrance /
Entrada del Carril Bici
del Río Los Ángeles
City Hall / Alcaldía
Library / Biblioteca
School / Escuela
Park / Parque
City of Maywood
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Maywood
Other Comments? /
¿Otros Comentarios?
Proposed Bicycle Network / red ciclista Propuesta
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 88 Page 336 of 360 Bike Intersection Recommendations Poster
This poster was developed to illustrate the specific locations of proposed treatments and to collect community feedback on if the public felt these improvements would improve cyclist safety at intersections. Participants were asked if they felt these treatments would be beneficial to the community and to place a sticker in the corresponding box indicating “yes” or “no.” Project staff also recorded verbal comments for individuals that wanted to provide additional suggestions, comments, or improvements to the proposed treatments.

Proposed Treatments / Tratamientos Propuestos
Please let us know if you like the following treatments / Por favor, díganos si le gustan las siguientes mejoras
Yes / Sí No / No
Other Comments? / ¿Otros Comentarios?
Multi-Way Stop / Parada Multidireccional
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Multi-Way Stop /
Parada Multidireccional
Bike Intersection
Treatments /
Intersecciones para
Bicicletas
Bike Push Button /
Pulsador Bici
Yes / Sí Other Comments? /
¿Otros Comentarios?
No / No
Bike Detection Loop /
Circuito de Detección
Yes / Sí Other Comments? /
¿Otros Comentarios?
No / No
Bike Detection Sign /
Señal de Detección
Yes / Sí Other Comments? /
¿Otros Comentarios?
No / No
Intersection
Improvements /
Mejoras de la
Intersección
City of Bell
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Bell
City of Maywood
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Maywood
Local Bike Networks /
Redes de Bicicletas
Locales
City of Huntington Park
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Huntington Park
Existing Context /
Contexto Actual
Los Angeles River Bike
Path /
Carril Bici del Río Los
Ángeles
Los Angeles River Bike
Path Entrance /
Entrada del Carril Bici del
Río Los Ángeles
City Hall / Alcaldía
Library / Biblioteca
School / Escuela
Park / Parque
Proposed Bike Intersection Improvements /
Mejoras propuestas en las intersecciones para bicicletas Pedestrian Intersection Recommendations Poster
This poster was developed to illustrate the specific locations of proposed treatments and to collect community feedback on if the public felt these improvements would improve pedestrian safety at intersections. Participants were asked if they felt these treatments would be beneficial to the community and to place a sticker in the corresponding box indicating “yes” or “no.” Project staff also recorded verbal comments for individuals that wanted to provide additional suggestions, comments, or improvements to the proposed treatments.

Proposed Treatments / Tratamientos Propuestos
Please let us know if you like the following treatments / Por favor, díganos si le gustan las siguientes mejoras
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Leading Pedestrian Interval / Señal Peatonal Yes / Sí No / No Other Comments? / ¿Otros Comentarios?
Other Comments? /
¿Otros Comentarios?
High Visibility Crosswalk / Cruce Peatonal de Alta Visibilidad Yes / Sí No / No
Proposed Pedestrian Intersection Improvements /
Mejoras propuestas en las intersecciones para peatones
High Visibility
Crosswalk /
Cruce Peatonal de
Alta Visibilidad
Intersection
Improvements /
Mejoras de la
Intersección
Pedestrian LPI /
Señal Peatonal Anterior
City of Bell
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Bell
City of Maywood
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Maywood
Local Bike Networks /
Redes de Bicicletas
Locales
City of Huntington Park
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Huntington Park
Existing Context /
Contexto Actual
Los Angeles River Bike
Path /
Carril Bici del Río Los
Ángeles
Los Angeles River Bike
Path Entrance /
Entrada del Carril Bici del
Río Los Ángeles
City Hall / Alcaldía
Library / Biblioteca
School / Escuela
Park / Parque
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 89 Page 337 of 360 Roadway Recommendations Poster
This poster was developed to illustrate the specific locations of proposed treatments and to collect community feedback on if the public felt these improvements would improve cyclist safety at intersections. Participants were asked if they felt these treatments would be beneficial to the community and to place a sticker in the corresponding box indicating “yes” or “no.” Project staff also recorded verbal comments for individuals that wanted to provide additional suggestions, comments, or improvements to the proposed treatments.

Proposed Treatments / Tratamientos Propuestos
Please let us know if you like the following treatments / Por favor, díganos si le gustan las siguientes mejoras
Other Comments? / ¿Otros Comentarios?
Edge Line Treatment / Línea de Borde
00 0.25 .5
Miles
Curb Extension /
Extención de Acera
Yes / Sí No / No Yes / Sí No / No Other Comments? /
¿Otros Comentarios?
Speed Hump /
Tope de Velocidad
Yes / Sí No / No Other Comments? /
¿Otros Comentarios?
Proposed Roadway Improvements /
Mejoras propuestas para las Calles
Edge Line Treatment /
Línea de Borde
Curb Extension /
Extención de Acera
Roadway
Improvements /
Mejoras para las Calles
Speed Hump /
Tope de Velocidad
City of Bell
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Bell
City of Maywood
Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Maywood
Local Bike Networks /
Redes de Bicicletas
Locales
City of Huntington Park Proposed Bike Network /
Red Ciclista Propuesta de la
Ciudad de Huntington Park
Existing Context /
Contexto Actual
Los Angeles River Bike
Path /
Carril Bici del Río Los
Ángeles
Los Angeles River Bike Path
Entrance /
Entrada del Carril Bici del
Río Los Ángeles
City Hall / Alcaldía
Library / Biblioteca
School / Escuela
Park / Parque

APPENDIX C: COMMUNITY OUTEACH RESULTS

Community Survey #1 Results
The first survey was implemented during the first community charrette at Fishburn Avenue Elementary School and was digitally available for two months following on the City webpage. Participants were asked indicate what modes of transportation they typically rely on to get to certain destinations as well as indicate areas of Maywood were they felt particularly unsafe walking or riding their bike.

Responses to identifying areas of concern were recorded and provided below:
• 54th street and everett and on 54th street and Loma vista we need stop signs on all corners its hard to cross in car or walking people dont bother stoping and weve had many accidents on both locations . we really need stop signs. • Atlantic and Slauson has many accidents, especially when trying to make left turns, there are many cars that speed up to beat the red light instead of slowing down and stopping to allow the left turns.
• The curve on 55th and Atlantic should be worked on to reduce speed and mark the area with a sign or lighting to reduce car accidents • The free local shuttle is important for seniors and others who need to get around the city. It should run throughout local streets not just the main big streets. • The streets should have trees that provide shade NOT palm trees. There are several drought tolerant trees that provide shade and reduce the heat index of the city. Trees should be not just on the main big streets but local streets that are overly paved without trees or very little trees. This will influence more walking and make it safer to walk to a shuttle stop or to a local store or to school.

Destination Personal Vehicle Carpool Walk Bike Public/Para Transit How do you usually travel to and from hospital/medical facilities? 5 1 0 2 How do you usually travel to and from places of worship? 2 1 1 How do you usually travel to and from getting grocceries? 4 2 1 1 How do you usually travel to and from parks and other recretional facilities? 4 2 1 0 How do you usually travel to and from local school? 2 2 2 0 2 How do you usually travel to and from work? 4 2 1 0
Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 92 Page 340 of 360 Recommended Treatment Supportive Unsupportive Recorded Community Feedback High Visibility Crosswalk 40 3 Pairs well with LPI treatment Edge Line Treatment 37 6
Fix sidewalks, add speeding cameras, add dedicated bus pickup lane on 58th St in front of Fishburn Ave Elementary
Speed Humps 37 10
Include on 53rd, Include near YMCA, Include on Everett, include on Fishburn Ave, include on 52nd, include on Corona
Curb Extension 36 7 Damage to car, reduced parking, include on King Multi-Way Stop 36 4 More police enforcement, people run stops along 52nd, 53rd, Loma Vista, Everett, LPI 36 0 Can this also include vision/hearing impaired features? Bike Push Button 32 0
Bike Detection Sign 31 4 Could have issues detecting bikes made of different materials, Bike Detection Loop 29 0
Bike Network 29 11
59th & King needs crossing guards and is very dangerous during school pick-up and dropoff, consider making some streets one-way
Wayfinding 32 18 Can this be translated in Spanish too? Community Survey #2 Results
The table above provides the responses by community members indicating their support and disapproval for the various treatments recommended in the Maywood ATP. Participants were presented images of the proposed treatments along with a map indicating where they would be installed, and asked to vote “Yes” if they felt the treatments would improve walking and biking conditions in Maywood, or “No” if they felt they would do the opposite. Explanations of each treatment were provided in both English and Spanish by project staff. T The second survey was implemented during the final three community outreach events:
• The backpack and school supply distribution at the YMCA (August 2023) • The mobile food pantry at the YMCA (August 2023)
• Community Charrette #2 at Fishburn Avenue Elementary School (October 2023) Maywood Active Transportation (Bike and Pedestrian) Master Plan - 93 Page 341 of 360 APPENDIX D: DETAILED PROJECT COST ESTIMATES

City of Maywood Active
Transportation
Bike and Pedestrian
Master Plan
Final Plan Overview I October 25, 2023

Improve overall
motorized and nonmotorized transportation
modes - such as
pedestrian, bicycle, and
transit safety throughout
the city
Provide new network
connections and leverage
connections to existing
and proposed local and
regional facilities
Improve economic vitality
by enhancing mobility
and connectivity to the
city’s several activity
generators and
destinations
Identify a set of active
transportation facilities
and improvements that
can be accurately priced,
prioritized, and submitted
for construction funding
and implementation
Project Goals & Objectives

Plan Development Process

1. Data Collection
– Data Analysis
– Fieldwork

2. Community Engagement
– Community Touchpoints (5)
– Community Advisory Meeting (CAC) (2)

3. Project Recommendations
– Bicycle Network, Bicycle Intersection, Pedestrian Intersection, Roadway, Regional Connectivity

4. Implementation
– Project Prioritization
– Cost Estimates

Data Collection

Community Engagement
Touchpoints & Workshops

Community Engagement
Community Advisory Committee
CAC Members:
• Roberto Bustillo - Communities for a
Better Environment
• Antonio Garcia - Fishburn Elementary
School Principal
• Alberto Espiricueta - East Yard
Communities
• William Downing - Los Angeles
Unified School District (LAUSD)
• Andrea Aguilar - Southeast Rio Vista
YMCA
• Eric Maceda - Rivers for Action
CAC Meeting Dates
• Meeting #1 – January 30th, 2023
• Meeting #2 – July 31st, 2023

Project Recommendations:

Bicycle Network & Wayfinding Facility Improvements
Class III Bicycle Route rendering along 58th St Renderings of Bicycle Network Wayfinding signage

Recommendations

Project Recommendations:

Bicycle Intersection Facility Improvements
Multi-Way Stop rendering at Everett Ave & 55th St
Bike Intersection Signage Bike Loop Detector Bike Push Button

Recommendations

Project Recommendations:

Pedestrian Intersection Facility Improvements
High Visibility Rendering at Pine Ave & Slauson Ave
Leading Pedestrian Interval

Recommendations

Project Recommendations:

Roadway Facility Improvements
Edge Line Treatment Rendering along 55th Speed Humps St Curb Extensions

Recommendations

Prioritization:

Weighted Criteria
Group Category Description Weight Category
Weight
Need and Equity
Commute by Walk Percentage of households within a 200 ft area of the corridor that primarily commute by foot.

Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5
25 Low Vehicle Access Percentage of households that have no vehicles available within a 200 ft area of each corridor.

Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5
Commute by Bike Percentage of households within 200 ft area of each corridor that primarily commute by bike.

Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5
Commute by Transit Percentage of households within 200 ft area of each corridor according that primarily commute by taking public transit. Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5
Median Household Income The average median household income for the 200 ft surrounding each corridor. Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5
Safety Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions The total count of bicycle and pedestrian- involved collisions within a 200 ft area of each corridor.

Source: TIMS , years 2017 - 2021. 35 35
Community Feedback Areas of Concern
Street segments identified by residents as unsafe for walking, biking and accessing public transit from Community Feedback from Survey #1 and collected feedback from first two community touchpoints.
25 25
Network Connectivity
Potential Pedestrian Use The total number of residents living within a 200 ft of each corridor. Source: 2020 ACS estimates. 5 Transit Accessibility The count of local and regional stops located within a 200 ft area of each corridor. 5 15 Nearby Attractors The count of nearby attractors including parks, schools, shopping centers, and other local institutions within 200 ft of each corridor. 5
TOTAL 100

Implementation
Prioritization:

Corridor Scores
Corridor Name
Median
Household
Income
Pecentage of
Workers Over
16 Commute
by Bike
Pecentage of
Workers Over
16 Commute
by Walking
Pecentage of
Workers Over 16
Commute by
Public Transit
Percentage of
Households with
Zero Vehicle
Access
Census
Block
Population
Total Bike
and Ped
Collisions
Per Corridor
Total Nearby
Attractors
Total Transit
Stops
Community
Input Total Score
Slauson Ave 2.76 2.83 0.85 2.53 3.07 2.41 35.00 5.00 5.00 25.00 84.44 Pine Ave 3.66 2.47 2.06 0.72 5.00 0.97 12.89 3.00 0.31 25.00 56.09 Atlantic Blvd 2.76 1.37 0.72 1.55 4.14 2.20 20.26 2.50 1.09 14.29 50.89 53rd St 4.66 2.71 4.21 3.82 3.83 3.13 3.68 1.00 0.31 21.43 48.78 Carmelita Ave 4.56 5.00 2.56 4.95 3.66 3.79 1.84 0.50 0.47 21.43 48.76 58th St 2.94 3.10 0.64 3.06 3.41 2.66 3.68 3.50 0.16 25.00 48.14 Gifford Ave 3.40 4.98 3.09 5.00 3.70 3.70 0.00 0.50 0.00 21.43 45.80 52nd St 3.25 3.18 5.00 3.69 3.48 3.10 0.00 0.50 0.31 21.43 43.94 55th St 5.00 3.08 2.86 3.69 3.79 2.97 0.00 0.00 0.47 21.43 43.29 Everett Ave 4.31 2.29 3.02 3.74 3.06 3.57 0.00 0.50 0.16 14.29 34.94 King Ave 2.33 0.58 0.08 2.80 2.59 2.77 0.00 0.50 0.47 17.86 29.98 59th Pl 3.23 3.02 1.51 1.59 1.31 3.64 3.68 4.00 0.16 0.00 22.13 61st St 3.19 3.04 1.46 1.09 1.54 3.18 0.00 1.00 0.16 7.14 21.80 Woodlawn Ave 4.50 4.96 2.66 0.39 0.02 3.73 0.00 1.00 0.31 3.57 21.14 Alamo Ave 2.96 4.73 2.52 0.32 0.00 4.68 0.00 1.00 1.25 3.57 21.04 Heliotrope Circle 2.19 0.88 0.25 2.89 2.57 1.60 3.68 1.00 0.31 3.57 18.94 Maywood Ave 0.95 0.00 2.50 2.09 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 10.71 18.65 57th St 1.04 0.00 0.00 3.48 3.81 2.38 0.00 0.50 0.16 7.14 18.50 60th St 3.89 4.94 2.64 0.52 0.08 4.64 0.00 1.50 0.16 0.00 18.37 Walker Ave 2.80 4.78 2.54 0.33 0.00 5.00 0.00 1.00 0.16 0.00 16.61 Mayflower Ave 1.04 0.00 0.00 3.48 3.81 2.38 0.00 0.50 0.00 3.57 14.77 Randolph St 0.00 1.79 0.65 0.00 0.49 0.28 5.53 1.50 0.31 3.57 14.12 Prospect Ave 2.73 1.35 0.22 2.21 1.26 4.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.90 Heliotrope Ave 3.63 2.91 1.27 1.36 0.69 1.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.29 Vinevale Ave 2.74 1.36 0.22 2.21 1.26 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.99

Implementation
Implementation:

Projected Project Costs by Corridor
Corridor Sub-Total Mobilization (5%) Traffic Control (10%) Design (15%) Contingency (15%) Inflation (30%) Construction
Management and
Inspection (10%)
Grand Total
Atlantic Blvd $ 1,349,180 $ 67,459 $ 134,918 $ 202,377 $ 263,090 $ 605,107 $ 134,918 $ 2,757,049 Slauson Ave $ 1,287,300 $ 64,365 $ 128,730 $ 193,095 $ 251,024 $ 577,354 $ 128,730 $ 2,630,598 52nd St $ 187,539 $ 9,377 $ 18,754 $ 28,131 $ 36,570 $ 84,111 $ 18,754 $ 383,236 58th St $ 96,552 $ 4,828 $ 9,655 $ 14,483 $ 18,828 $ 43,304 $ 9,655 $ 197,304 53rd St $ 91,168 $ 4,558 $ 9,117 $ 13,675 $ 17,778 $ 40,889 $ 9,117 $ 186,302 59th Pl $ 81,782 $ 4,089 $ 8,178 $ 12,267 $ 15,947 $ 36,679 $ 8,178 $ 167,122 Randolph St $ 56,000 $ 2,800 $ 5,600 $ 8,400 $ 10,920 $ 25,116 $ 5,600 $ 114,436 King Ave $ 37,360 $ 1,868 $ 3,736 $ 5,604 $ 7,285 $ 16,756 $ 3,736 $ 76,345 55th St $ 36,714 $ 1,836 $ 3,671 $ 5,507 $ 7,159 $ 16,466 $ 3,671 $ 75,025 60th St $ 34,970 $ 1,749 $ 3,497 $ 5,246 $ 6,819 $ 15,684 $ 3,497 $ 71,461 Wayfinding Program $ 20,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,900 $ 8,970 $ 2,000 $ 40,870 Alamo Ave $ 19,550 $ 978 $ 1,955 $ 2,933 $ 3,812 $ 8,768 $ 1,955 $ 39,950 Walker Ave $ 16,674 $ 834 $ 1,667 $ 2,501 $ 3,251 $ 7,478 $ 1,667 $ 34,073 Pine Ave $ 14,674 $ 734 $ 1,467 $ 2,201 $ 2,861 $ 6,581 $ 1,467 $ 29,986 Heliotrope Ave $ 13,150 $ 658 $ 1,315 $ 1,973 $ 2,564 $ 5,898 $ 1,315 $ 26,872 Prospect Ave $ 13,150 $ 658 $ 1,315 $ 1,973 $ 2,564 $ 5,898 $ 1,315 $ 26,872 Vinevale Ave $ 13,170 $ 659 $ 1,317 $ 1,976 $ 2,568 $ 5,907 $ 1,317 $ 26,913 Heliotrope Circle $ 7,800 $ 390 $ 780 $ 1,170 $ 1,521 $ 3,498 $ 780 $ 15,939 Carmelita Ave $ 3,932 $ 197 $ 393 $ 590 $ 767 $ 1,764 $ 393 $ 8,035 E 61st St $ 3,864 $ 193 $ 386 $ 580 $ 753 $ 1,733 $ 386 $ 7,896 Everett Ave $ 3,656 $ 183 $ 366 $ 548 $ 713 $ 1,640 $ 366 $ 7,471 Gifford Ave $ 3,656 $ 183 $ 366 $ 548 $ 713 $ 1,640 $ 366 $ 7,471 Woodlawn Ave $ 1,380 $ 69 $ 138 $ 207 $ 269 $ 619 $ 138 $ 2,820 57th St $ 414 $ 21 $ 41 $ 62 $ 81 $ 186 $ 41 $ 846
Mayflower Ave $ 276 $ 14 $ 28 $ 41 $ 54 $ 124 $ 28 $ 564 Maywood Ave $ 276 $ 14 $ 28 $ 41 $ 54 $ 124 $ 28 $ 564
TOTAL $ 3,394,187 $ 169,709 $ 339,419 $ 509,128 $ 661,866 $ 1,522,293 $ 339,419 $ 6,936,021

Questions?