kimley-horn.com 3801 University Ave, Ste 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951-543-9868
Figure 1: Overview of Project Location within Riverside County
Figure 2: Current Study Areas within the Cimarron Ridge Specific Plan
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Ave, Ste 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951-543-9868
access is provided by Interstate 215 (I-215) located just over 1 mile east of the project site and local access to the Project area is provided from Goetz Rd and Valley Blvd (Figure 2).
Cultural and Natural Setting
The Project area is located within the southern portion of Perris Valley. This valley is a sub-basin of the San Jacinto watershed, which is one of three major geographical subdivisions of the Santa Ana Basin. It is bounded on the northeast by the San Jacinto Mountains and the southwest by the Santa Ana Mountains. A portion of the San Jacinto River is located approximately 0.8 miles to the northwest. The area, like much of California, contains a unique and diverse climate and environment. This regional diversity provided Native Californians the ability to exploit a range of different plants, animals, and natural resources (Lightfoot 2009).
The proposed Project area is located within the ancestral territory of the Luiseño. Although Alfred Kroeber recorded the territories of southern California tribes in 1925, the ancient territorial borders remain vague for two reasons: first, territorial boundaries were flexible and, secondly, indigenous borders and land use were not recorded until after European contact destroyed native lifeways.
Although firm and defining borders cannot be known, archaeological, ethnographic, and historic evidence exists to support the prehistoric occupation and use by the Luiseño.
Research
A review of available historical and topographic maps and technical studies was conducted to ascertain the potential for existing buried and built cultural resources. The entirety of the Project area was previously reviewed as a part of a cultural resources assessment and associated addendum completed in 2014 for the Cimarron Specific Plan. The records search conducted for the effort identified nine (9) prior surveys that overlapped with the Project area and resulted in the recordation of three (3) prehistoric archaeological sites within or adjacent to the Project area. This includes CA-RIV-4486 (single bedrock milling feature with associated stone tools and debitage), CA- RIV-7028 (two milling slicks on two boulders), and P-33-001078 (two milling slicks on one boulder).
The survey conducted for the 2014 study did not successfully relocate CA-RIV-4486 or CA-RIV-7028, and noted that the boulder within P-33-001078 had been relocated to the northern portion of the Project area and sustained extensive damage. The survey did not identify any new cultural resources and noted that the entirety of the Project area was highly disturbed as a result of grading and excavation operations and that the likelihood of present intact cultural resources within the Project area was low (Tang and Hogan 2014). Review of historic and current aerials of the Project area show the entirety of the Project area was subjected to minor modifications in the 1990s before undergoing extensive grading sometime between 2002 and 2005 (Historic Aerials).
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Ave, Ste 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951-543-9868
Results
The Project area has been subjected to multiple prior cultural resources assessments, during which time three (3) prehistoric archaeological sites were recorded within the Project area: CA-RIV-4486, CA-RIV-7028, and 33-001078. However, the 2014 study conducted for the Cimarron Ridge Specific Plan noted that the entirety of the Project area had been subject to extensive grading and excavation that all previously recorded sites were destroyed. This observation is corroborated by historical aerials, which show that the site was subject to extensive grading sometime between 2002 and 2005. Due to the presence of extensive grading and excavation, the likelihood of archaeological resources being present within the Project area is low. Finally, the site does not contain any standing buildings or structures that are older than 45 years, or any younger buildings that hold more recent historical value, that meet the definition of a cultural resource that require consideration.
Recommendations
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) did not identify any existing cultural resources, nor the potential for unknown buried cultural resources, as a part of the Cultural Resources Assessment Update for the Project. As such, no further consideration regarding the impacts to cultural resources as a result of the Project is recommended during the environmental review process. However, it is recommended that Project include conditions that outline process for the inadvertent discovery and treatment of cultural resources, as well as conditions outlining the legal process for inadvertent discovery of human remains referenced in California State Health and Safety Code 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The mitigation measures included in the 2015 Cimarron Ridge Specific Plan EIR, as well as the City of Menifee’s standard conditions of approval related to cultural resources, sufficiently address this recommendation.
Sincerely,
Jessica Mauck, MA, RPA
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA) Number: 37243944
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Ave, Ste 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951-543-9868
References
Historic Aerials. https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer. Accessed March 29, 2023.
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin No. 78. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. Reprinted in 1976, New York:
Dover.
Lightfoot, Kent G. and Otis Parrish 2009. California Indians and Their Environment. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California.
Tang, Bai “Tom”. 2014. Second Addendum to Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment: Tentative Tract Map No. 36658 (Off-site Improvements), City of Menifee, Riverside County, California. On file with CRM Tech, Colton, CA.
Tang, Bai “Tom”, and Michael Hogan. 2014. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment: Tentative Tract Map No. 36658, City of Menifee, Riverside County, California. On file with CRM Tech, Colton, CA.
Addendum Environmental Impact Report for the
City of Menifee TTM 36658 and Specific Plan 2013-247 (Cimarron Ridge) Project
February 2024 Appendix D
APPENDIX D
ALUC DEVELOPMENT REIVEW – DIRECTOR’S
DETERMINATION
Addendum Environmental Impact Report for the
City of Menifee TTM 36658 and Specific Plan 2013-247 (Cimarron Ridge) Project
February 2024 Appendix E
APPENDIX E
TRAFFIC CONSISTENCY MEMORANDUM
kimley-horn.com 1100 Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
MEMORANDUM
To: Desiree A. McGriff
Associate Planner
From:
Date:
Subject:
Community Development Department
City of Menifee
Trevor Briggs, P.E.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
October 11, 2023
Traffic Consistency Memorandum for the Modified Cimarron Ridge Specific Plan in the City of Menifee
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has prepared a traffic consistency memorandum to evaluate the consistency of the modified Cimarron Ridge Specific Plan (modified CRSP) with the original CRSP (adopted in October 2015) in the City of Menifee.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The CRSP is located within the City of Menifee. A copy of the original CRSP land use map is shown on Figure 1. The original CRSP was approved in October 2015 and consists of 756 single -family detached dwelling units (DU) and 10 acres of regional park across 7 planning areas (PA) as noted below:
• PA-1: 134 DU
• PA-2: 116 DU
• PA-3: 104 DU
• PA-4: 130 DU
• PA-5: 102 DU and 10 acres of regional park
• PA-6: 96 DU
• PA-7: 74 DU
As part of the CEQA documentation for the original CRSP, an environmental impact report (EIR) was prepared, which included a traffic study ( Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report, Cimmaron Ridge Specific Plan, December 2014) for the Specific Plan. The traffic study provided a program-level traffic evaluation of the original CRSP. The EIR for the CRSP was approved by the City of Menifee in October 2015.
- 2 -
FIGURE 1
ORIGINAL CIMARRON RIDGE
SPECIFIC PLAN (CRSP)
Ms. McGriff, October 11, 2023, Page 3
kimley-horn.com 1100 Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant proposes to modify the Cimarron Ridge Specific Plan as noted below:
• Relocating 49 single-family dwelling units from PA-4 to PA-5 • Relocating the 10.9-acre regional park from PA-5 to PA-4 As a result, PA-4 w ould consist of 81 single-family dwelling units and include a 10.9 -acre park consisting of active and passive uses and amenities, including a dog park for the community and on- site parking. PA-5 would consist of 151 single-family dwelling units. The overall modified Specific Plan would consist of 756 single -family dwelling units. The proposed modifications to the Specific Plan would not alter the overall density of the Specific Plan. A copy of the modified CRSP is provided on Figure 2.
TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
A trip generation analysis has been prepared to evaluate the trip -generating characteristics for the modified CRSP, compared to the approved trips within the original CRSP.
Approved Specific Plan Trips
The CRSP traffic study (December 2014) provides trip generation estimates for the original CRSP, which were approved by the City of Menifee. These trip generation estimates are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual , 9 th Edition. The traffic study assumed 782 DU and 10 acres of regional park as a worst-case scenario.
Based on the 2014 traffic study, the original CRSP would generate 7,491 daily trips, with 589 trips (148 inbound and 441 outbound) in the morning peak hour, and 784 trips (494 inbound and 290 outbound) in the evening peak hour. The approved trip generation estimates for the original CRSP are provided in Appendix A.
Modified Specific Plan Trips
For consistency with the original CRSP traffic study, the modified CRSP trip generation estimates were based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. Trip generation rates and the resulting trip generation estimates for the modified CRSP are summari zed on Table 1. Based Table 1, the modified CRSP is estimated to generate approximately 7,197 daily trips, with 568 trips (142 inbound and 426 outbound) in the morning peak hour, and 756 trips (476 inbound and 280 outbound) in the evening peak hour.
- 4 -
FIGURE 2
PROPOSED MODIFIED SPECIFIC PLAN
TABLE 1
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
ORIGINAL CRSP TRAFFIC STUDY VS. MODIFIED CRSP
Trip Generation Rates 1
Land Use Unit AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 DU 9.52 0.19 0.56 0.75 0.63 0.37 1.00 Regonal Park 417 Acre 4.57 0.09 0.11 0.20 0.09 0.06 0.15 Trip Generation Estimates
Land Use Quantity Unit AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 782 DU 7,445 147 440 587 493 289 782 Regonal Park 10.000 Acre 46 1 1 2 1 1 2
Total Original CRSP Trips 7,491 148 441 589 494 290 784 Single-Family Detached Housing 756 DU 7,197 142 426 568 476 280 756 Regonal Park 10.000 Acre 46 1 1 2 1 1 2
Total Proposed CRSP Trips 7,197 142 426 568 476 280 756 Net Difference (Modified Minus Original) -294 -6 -15 -21 -18 -10 -28 1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Original CRSP
Modified CRSP
ITE Code Daily
Daily
Cimarron Ridge Specific Plan
Traffic Consistency Memorandum - 5 -Kim
ley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
October 2023
Ms. McGriff, October 11, 2023, Page 6
kimley-horn.com 1100 Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Compared to the original CRSP, the modified CRSP would generate 294 fewer daily trips, with 21 fewer trips in the morning peak hour and 28 fewer trips in the evening peak hour. As a result, the modified CRSP would be consistent with the findings and conclusions noted in the 2014 traffic study for the original CRSP.
FOCUSED LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS
The CRSP bisects Valley Boulevard. The proposed modifications to the Specific Plan would relocate 49 single-family dwelling units originally located on the west side of Valley Boulevard to the east side of Valley Boulevard. As such, a focused traffic analysis was conducted to evaluate the traffic - related effects at the intersection of Valley Boulevard and Goetz Road.
Analysis Methodology
Analysis Scenarios
As a worst-case scenario, the focused LOS analysis was conducted for the following scenario:
• Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Plus Project Phase I&II Plus Modified CRSP The “Plus Modified CRSP” scenario will include the addi tion of the trips generated by the 49 DU relocated to the east of Valley Boulevard.
Analysis Volumes
The analysis volumes from the 2014 traffic study for “Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Plus Project Phase I&II” condition at the intersection of Goetz Road and Valley Boulevard were used as the base volumes for the analysis scenario noted above . The base volumes from the 2014 traffic study for the intersection of Goetz Road at Valley Boulevard (Intersection #12) are shown in Appendix A . As noted in the section above, the “Plus Modified CRSP” scenario will include the addition of trips generated by the 49 DU relocated to the east side of Valley Boulevard.
Level of Service Standards
Peak hour intersection operations were evaluated using the methodology outlined in the Transportation Resource Board (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 7th Edition), consistent with the requirements of the City of Menifee. The intersection analysis was con ducted using the Vistro software program and using the input parameters specified in the City of Menifee LOS Traffic Study Guidelines.
Ms. McGriff, October 11, 2023, Page 7
kimley-horn.com 1100 Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 The City of Menifee LOS Traffic Study Guidelines (October 2020) establishes minimum Level of Service standards, which has identified LOS D as the threshold for acceptable operating conditions for intersections.
Trip Generation and Distribution
Based on the average trip rates from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, the relocated 49 DU would generate approximately 466 daily trips, with 37 trips (9 inbound and 28 outbound) in the morning peak hour and 49 trips (31 inbound and 18 outbound) in the evening peak hour. These trip generation estimates are summarized on Table 2.
The trip distribution for the 49 relocated residential DU w as based on the trip distribution assumptions for the original CRSP in the 2014 traffic study and is provided in Appendix A. Based on Appendix A, the trip distribution for the 49 relocated DU at the intersection of Goetz Road and Valley Boulevard would assume 50% to the north, 45% to the south, and 5% to the west.
Intersection LOS Analysis
A focused intersection Level of Service analysis was conducted during the morning and evening peak hours under Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Plus Project Phase I&II Plus Modified CRSP conditions for the intersection of Goetz Road and Valley Boulevard. The results are shown on Table 3. Intersection analysis worksheets for this scenario are provided in Appendix B.
Based on review of Table 3 and consistent with the LOS results for the intersection of G oetz Road and Valley Boulevard in the 2014 traffic study, the intersection would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS. Therefore, the proposed lane configurations for the intersection of Goetz Road and Valley Boulevard can adequately accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed modifications.
VMT ASSESSMENT
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified by the City of Menifee for the original CRSP. It is proposed that an Addendum to the CRSP EIR be prepared for the modified CRSP.
Level of Service was the applicable threshold when the City certified the CRSP EIR. The mandate requiring lead agencies to use VMT as a threshold for evaluating traffic impacts was adopted in 2018 and effective in 2020. VMT does not constitute as “new info rmation” requiring additional environmental review nor does it affect the assessment of project transportation impacts or mitigation measures compared to those analyzed in the original CRSP EIR.
As noted earlier, compared to the original CRSP, the modified CRSP would generate 294 fewer daily trips, with 21 fewer trips in the morning peak hour and 28 fewer trips in the evening peak hour.
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RELOCATED
DWELLING UNITS IN PA 5 OF THE MODIFIED CRSP
Trip Generation Rates 1
ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Code Unit Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 DU 9.52 0.19 0.56 0.75 0.63 0.37 1.00 Trip Generation Estimates
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Quantity Unit Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 49 DU 466 9 28 37 31 18 49 Total Project Trips 466 9 28 37 31 18 49
1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Cimarron Ridge Specific Plan
Traffic Consistency Memorandum - 8 -
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Octob
er 2023
EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH PLUS CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT PHASE I&II PLUS MODIFIED CRSP Traffic AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Control Delay LOS Delay LOS
Goetz Road at Valley Boulevard U 12.9 B 14.8 B
SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION OPERATIONS
- Delay values for u
nsignalized intersections represent the average vehicle delay on the worst (highest delay) intersection approach.
U = Unsignalized
Notes:
Intersection
TABLE 3
Cimarron Ridge Specific Plan
Traffic Consistency Memorandum - 9 -
Kimle y-Horn and Associates, Inc.
October 2023
Ms. McGriff, October 11, 2023, Page 10
kimley-horn.com 1100 Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Since the forecasted trip generation for the modified CRSP is less than what was previously analyzed for the original CRSP, the modified CRSP would not change the CRSP EIR determination with regards to transportation-related impacts. Therefore, the modified CRSP would create a less-than-significant VMT impact, and no further VMT analysis is required for the modified CRSP.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The traffic impacts of the modified CRSP are consistent with those analyzed in the 2014 traffic study.
The modified CRSP would generate fewer daily trips and peak hour trips than what was analyzed in the original 2014 traffic study for the original CRSP EIR. The traffic generated by the modified CRSP would not cause additional impacts at the intersection of Goetz Road and Valley Boulevard than those analyzed in the 2014 traffic study.
Based on the focused LOS analysis, the proposed lane conf igurations for the intersection of Goetz Road and Valley Boulevard can adequately accommodate the traffic generated by the modified CRSP.
In addition, since the modified CRSP would generate less trips than what was previously analyzed, the modified CRSP would create a less-than-significant VMT impact, and no further VMT analysis is required for the modified CRSP.
APPENDIX A
EXCREPTS FROM REVISED TRAFFIC
IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT,
CIMARRON RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN
(DECEMBER 2014)
APPENDIX B
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
WORKSHEETS
Intersection Analysis Summary
9/20/2023Report File: K:\...\OY CUM WP AM.pdf
Scenario 2 OY CUM WP AMVistro File: K:\...\Cimarron Ridge_AM.vistro Cimarron Ridge Traffic Memorandum
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
B12.90.423EB LeftHCM 7th
EditionTwo-way stopValley Boulevard at Goetz
Road1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Scenario 2: 2 OY CUM WP AM
Cimarron Ridge Traffic Memorandum
Version 2023 (SP 0-7)
Generated with
0.423Volume to Capacity (v/c):
BLevel Of Service:
12.9Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 7th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Valley Boulevard at Goetz Road
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]
30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph]
0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001001001001No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Name
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
2874752333137321015122Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
721211833483431Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 2874752333137321015122Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
14113000005400Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 146345233313732511122Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Name
Volumes
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Scenario 2: 2 OY CUM WP AM
Cimarron Ridge Traffic Memorandum
Version 2023 (SP 0-7)
Generated with
BIntersection LOS
8.22d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
ABAAApproach LOS
9.0512.790.410.52d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
2.852.854.060.600.6052.910.000.000.480.000.000.1195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.110.110.160.020.022.120.000.000.020.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABAAABAAAAAAMovement LOS
8.5310.459.158.799.9412.870.000.007.290.000.007.56d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.030.010.050.010.000.420.000.000.010.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
0000Storage Area [veh]
NoNoFlared Lane
StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Scenario 2: 2 OY CUM WP AM
Cimarron Ridge Traffic Memorandum
Version 2023 (SP 0-7)
Generated with
Intersection Analysis Summary
9/20/2023Report File: K:\...\OY CUM WP PM.pdf
Scenario 2 OY CUM WP PMVistro File: K:\...\Cimarron Ridge_PM.vistro Cimarron Ridge Traffic Memorandum
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.
B14.80.400EB LeftHCM 7th
EditionTwo-way stopValley Boulevard at Goetz
Road1
LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Scenario 2: 2 OY CUM WP PM
Cimarron Ridge Traffic Memorandum
Version 2023 (SP 0-7)
Generated with
0.400Volume to Capacity (v/c):
BLevel Of Service:
14.8Delay (sec / veh):
15 minutesAnalysis Period:
HCM 7th EditionAnalysis Method:
Two-way stopControl Type:
Intersection 1: Valley Boulevard at Goetz Road
Intersection Level Of Service Report
YesYesNoNoCrosswalk
0.000.000.000.00Grade [%]
30.0030.0030.0030.00Speed [mph]
0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket
100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001001001001No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket
12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration
WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach
Name
Intersection Setup
0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h]
1853038245335223152366Total Analysis Volume [veh/h]
518126184681392Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1853038245335223152366Total Hourly Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Other Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h]
000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h]
000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h]
91802000161400Site-Generated Trips [veh/h]
000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor
2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%]
1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 942236245335221538366Base Volume Input [veh/h]
Name
Volumes
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Scenario 2: 2 OY CUM WP PM
Cimarron Ridge Traffic Memorandum
Version 2023 (SP 0-7)
Generated with
BIntersection LOS
5.73d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]
ABAAApproach LOS
9.7514.590.590.51d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]
2.202.203.051.371.3748.050.000.001.580.000.000.3895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln]
0.090.090.120.050.051.920.000.000.060.000.000.0295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] ABAABBAAAAAAMovement LOS
8.6712.909.889.4311.5714.750.000.007.440.000.008.02d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]
0.020.010.040.000.010.400.000.000.020.000.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median
NoNoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance
0000Storage Area [veh]
NoNoFlared Lane
StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme
Intersection Settings
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Scenario 2: 2 OY CUM WP PM
Cimarron Ridge Traffic Memorandum
Version 2023 (SP 0-7)
Generated with