Appeal Letter - GSEJA — Menifee City Council, July 16, 2025

CITY OF
City of Mientee CITY OF MENIFEE
City Clerk Department APPEAL APPLICATION

MENIFEE
MAY 20 2025 Decision to be appealed lot Plan PLN 23-0040

RECEIVED
APPELLANT/REPRESENTATIVE Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance LAST
PHONE NO. (951) 279-4697 N/A _E-MAIL [email protected] FAX NO. —
ADDRESS 765 N. Maint St. #151 Corona CA 92880

STREET CITY STATE ZIP

PROPERTY OWNER
(if different) LAST FIRST
PHONE NO. FAX NO. _ E-MAIL

ADDRESS

STREET CITY STATE ZIP
Northern Gateway Logistics Center Project - APN: 331-060-007 / 331-060-008 / 33-060-030 / Name of Project, APN/Address: 331-060-023/331-060.020
Appealing the decision of (Specify Community Development Director, Building and Safety Director City Manager, Planning Commission): Planning Commission
Action and Date: Certification of the EIR for the Northern Gateway Logistics Center Project - 5/14/2025 Explain specify what action or decision is being appealed: See attached Appeal Letter Do you have additional evidence not already presented? _Yes X_ No. If Yes, please attach.

What result do you want Planning Commission decision reversed and a new EIR recirculated for public review Applicant's Signature _ Lucio Date: 5/17/2025
Terry
Owner Certification:_| certify under the penalty of the laws of the State of California that I am the property owner of the property that is the subject matter of this appeal application. I am authorizing and hereby do consent to the filing of this application and acknowledge that the final approval by the City of Menifee, if any, may result in restrictions, limitations and construction obligations being imposed on this real property.

Owner's Signature: . Date:

Print Name:

Written authorization from the legal property owner is required. An authorized agent for the owner must attach a notarized letter of authorization from the legal property owner.

No application will be accepted until is complete and the fee paid.

Once complete, you will receive confirmation and a hearing date as well as additional appeal information. For questions, please contact the City Clerk at (951) 672-6777.

Green Jobs & Clean Communities
May 18, 2025
City Council
City of Menifee
29844 Haun Rd.

Menifee, CA 92586
SUBJECT: Appeal to the Menifee City Council regarding a decision of the Menifee Planning Commission, during the Planning Commission Meeting of May 14, 2025. Specifically, the Certification of the Environmental Impact Report for Plot Plan No. PLN 23-0040.

PROJECT NAME: Northern Gateway Logistics Center - SCH 2021110379 APPELLANT: Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance

PURPOSE OF APPEAL
This appeal seeks to reverse the entire decision of the Planning Commission's decision on May 14, 2025, approving the Northern Gateway Logistics Center.

JUSTIFICATIONS FOR APPEAL AND REJECTION OF PROJECT
Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance ("Appellant") presented multiple arguments in our comment letter dated July 17, 2024, addressing the flaws of the EIR (see attached). Additionally, comments sent to the Planning Commission on May 11, 2025, addressed the Commission's duty to adequately address the environmental, social, and economic justice burden placed on the City of Menifee residents. The Planning Commission should have requested a new EIR be prepared for this project, due to the deficiencies of the EIR and continued health, air quality, ozone, pollution and traffic impacts the citizenry of Menifee will suffer which will include residents of cities and the county upstream and downstream of the project based on our comment letters dated July 17, 2024 and May 11, 2025 which were similar issues also addressed by the City of Perris in their comments. 1 of 6
Golfate Scrap,
Green Jobs & Clean Communities

HEALTH RISK & TRAFFIC IMPACTS OF WAREHOUSES ON SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES Our July 17, 2024, comment letter highlighted that the proposed Project may contribute to disproportionate health risks that community members within the immediate area already face. This topic is underscored by the intent of Senate Bill ('SB") 1000 and other guidelines by the California Department of Justice ("CA DOJ"). The applicability and intent of SB 1000, which goes beyond funding allocations and mandates that environmental justice be integrated into local land use planning.

CA DOJ guidelines further clarify that cumulative impacts of greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants from warehouses should be assessed during environmental review, particularly where disadvantaged communities are affected. With the City of Perris being a SB535 Designated Disadvantaged Community, which is located upstream of the Project, it would have been prudent and neighborly to have considered the effects of this Project on its adjacent neighbor.

To accurately assess the Project's impact on surrounding communities, both existing and anticipated warehouse developments should be considered during the environmental review process. We therefore maintain that a revised EIR should be prepared in accordance with SB 1000 and CA DOJ guidance, to incorporate environmental justice principles and provide a cumulative impact analysis of the Project's contribution to local health risks.

Based on data from Pomona Pitzer's Robert Redford Conservancy - Warehouse City database below. The City of Menifee already has over 19,000.000 Sq. Ft. of approved, existing, in review or vacant space in its warehouse inventory. The projected Daily Truck Trips within Menifee's inventory are forecast at 12,000 per the Warehouse City database. The Census Tract where this warehouse is proposed already suffers from a traffic burden 74% higher than other Census Tracts within California based on the Cal Enviro Screening 4.0 reflected on Pg. 3. The Cal Enviro Screening also reflects the expanded burdens the Census Tract already encounters versus the rest of the state.

Warehouse CITY
Robert Redford

CONSERVANCY

THAR COLLIGE
Category Warehouse Count Acreage Warehouse Floor Space (Sq.Ft.) Daly TrucK rips Daly Diesel PM (pounds) Daily No Rounds) Daly corsetic tons 3032 Approved 9,700,000
CEQA Review 8 201 4,800,000 3,000 467 126.2 1,608
Existing 26 188 4,516,800 3,000 467 126.2 1,504
Vacant 2 12 283.200
Totals 41 805 19,300,000 12,000 16.5 1869 504.7 6,344
2 of 6
Goffen
Green Jobs & Clean Communities
Northern Gateway Logistics Center
Census Tract: 6065042731
Population: 8,161
Overall Percentiles %
Population Characteristics Percentile 56%
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile 55%
Sensitive Populations
Cardiovascular Disease 78%
Low Birth Weight 53%
Asthma 49%
Exposures %
Ozone 91%
Traffic 74%
Pesticides 70%
Drinking Water 67%
Particulate Matter 2.5 51%
Socioeconomic Factors %
Education 79%
Unemployment 73%
The Planning Commission had a duty to adequately address the environmental, social, and economic burden placed on the City of Menifee residents, specifically Census Tract 6065042731 and the other community members upstream and downstream of the project such as your neighbor the City of Perris, which is a SB 535 Disadvantaged Community. This City of Perris SB 535 community located north of the project is illustrated with the Cal Enviro Screening on page 4. The Planning Commission should have requested a new EIR be prepared for this project, due to the deficiencies of the EIR and continued health, exposures, socioeconomic factors and environmental effects the citizenry of Menifee already suffers and will continue to suffer, based on our comment letter dated July 17, 2024. 3 of 6
Green Jobs & Clean Communities
SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities 2022 (Census Tracts): 6065042901 DAC Category CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Top 25%
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile Score 81.85
Population 7,591
Census Tract 6065042901
ZIP Code 92570
County Riverside
City of Perris
Census Tract: 6065042901
Population: 7,151
Overall Percentiles. %
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile 82%
Population Characteristics Percentile* 81%
Pollution Burden Percentile
Exposures ITe
Ozone
Diesel Particulate Matter
Drinking Water
Toxic Releases
Pesticides
Particulate Matter 2.5
Environmental Effects
Hazardous Waste
Solid Waste
Cleanup Sites 81%
Sensitive Populations
Cardiovascular Disease 89%
Asthma 65%
Socioeconomic Factors
Education 86%
Poverty 83%
Linguistic Isolation 77%
Unemployment 75%
Housing Burden 67%
4 of 6
Green Jobs & Clean Communities

GRIEVANCES
With the Planning Commission's decision to certify the project FEIR, on May 14, 2025. GSEJA believes the Planning Commission did not fulfill its duty to adequately investigate nor mitigate the project. Further, under CEQA, the city must "Take all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise."
The importance of a healthy environment for all of California's residents is reflected in CEQA's purpose.

In passing CEQA, the Legislature determined:

CEQA's Purposes
"The maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future is a matter of statewide concern." (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000, subd. (a).) • We must "identify any critical thresholds for the health and safety of the people of the state and take all coordinated actions necessary to prevent such thresholds from being reached." (Id. at subd. (d).)
• "[M]ajor consideration [must be] given to preventing environmental damage, while providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every Californian." (Id. at subd. (g).) • We must "[t]ake all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise." (Pub. Res. Code, § 21001, subd. (b).) Cities, counties, and other local governmental entities have an important role to play in ensuring environmental justice for all of California's residents. Under state law: "[E]nvironmental justice" means the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.

Gov. Code, § 65040.12, subd. (e).) Fairness in this context means that the benefits of a healthy environment should be available to everyone, and the burdens of pollution should not be focused on sensitive populations or on communities that already are experiencing its adverse effects. 5 of 6
Green Jobs & Clean Communities
The City Council needs to make the right decision and further protect its citizenry and neighbors from the environmental impact burdens they will encounter and approve GSEJA's appeal in requesting a new EIR and strive for a Leadership in Energy Environmental Design (LEED) Platinum Certification and or Net Zero Project.

CONCLUSION
Due to the above-mentioned reasons as well as the reasons listed in the original comment letter to the EIR, GSEJA believes the EIR is flawed and a new EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. GSEJA requests the City of Menifee City Council reverse the decision of the Planning Commission approval of the project and require a new EIR.

Sincerely,
Joe Bourgeois Terry Lucio
Executive Director Vice President
Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance 765 N. Main St. Suite 151 765 N. Main St. Suite 151
Corona, CA 92880 Corona, CA 92880
(951) 279-4697 (951) 279-4697
6 of 6

BLUM, COLLINS & HO LLP

TO WINE OU LAND
July 17, 2024
Brandon Cleary VIA EMAIL TO:

City of Menifee [email protected]
29844 Haun Road
Menifee, CA 92586
SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON NORTHERN GATEWAY LOGISTICS CENTER
(SCH NO. 2021110379)
Dear Mr. Cleary,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Northern Gateway Logistics Center Project. Please accept and consider these comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. Also, Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance formally requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

1.0 Summary
The project proposes the construction and operation of two new concrete tilt up warehouse and distribution buildings totaling 398,252 square feet (sq. ft.) of total building area on an approximately 20.17 acre site. Building 1 is proposed to be 105,537 sq. ft. consisting of 6,000 sq. ft. of office space and 99,537 sq. ft. of warehouse space and is located on the north side of the site.

Building 2 is on the southern end of the site and is proposed to be 292,715 sq. ft. consisting of 8,000 sq. ft of office space, 7,000 sq. ft. of mezzanine, and 277,715 sq. ft. of warehouse area.

Building 1 includes 15 truck/trailer loading dock doors and Building 2 includes 37 truck/trailer loading dock doors.

2.0 Project Description
The EIR does not include a floor plan, detailed elevations, or a conceptual grading plan for any of the project sites. The basic components of a Planning Application include a detailed site plan, Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 2 ends

floor plan, conceptual grading plan, written narrative, and detailed elevations. For example, the elevations provided in Exhibit 2-9 and Exhibit 2-10 do not include the paint colors or building materials. The site plans provided in Exhibit 2-6 and Exhibit 2-7 have been edited to remove pertinent information from public review including the legend and key notes. Further, the Project Description states that off-site improvements include "relocation of an underground flood channel," but the EIR does not provide any specific information regarding this aspect of the project, which would typically be described in a Project Narrative and associated plans that must be included as part of a revised EIR.

The EIR has also excluded a grading plan from public review. The EIR states that, "the Project would require approximately 34,865 Cubic Yards (CYs) of soil cut and 33,346 CYs soil fill resulting in approximately 1,519 CYs of export to balance the site," yet there is no method for the public to verify this claim. Providing the grading plan and earthwork quantity notes is vital as this directly informs the quantity of necessary truck hauling trips due to soil import/export during the grading phase of construction. Additionally, the Project Description states that off-site improvements include "relocation of an underground flood channel," which will likely require additional cut/fill and earthwork movement due to its underground nature, and the EIR has not indicated that this is included in the earthwork quantities provided. A revised EIR must be prepared to include wholly accurate and unedited detailed floor plan, grading plan, site plan, elevations, and project narrative for public review.

The Project Description also provides a list of off-site improvements required to operate the proposed project. However, the list is not adequate as it does not provide sufficient details or state the extent the off-site improvements. For example, the entirety of Evans Road from Ethanac Road to McLaughlin Road is currently unimproved (unpaved dirt) and will need to be constructed in order to serve the proposed project. Further, the Site Plan depicts that a new street will need to be constructed to serve the south side of the project site and is referred to as "A Street" within the EIR, but construction of "A Street" is excluded from the list of off-site improvements.

Additionally, elsewhere within the Project Description it is stated that off-site improvements include "relocation of an underground flood channel." However, this is also excluded from the list of off-site improvements, and the EIR does not provide any specific information regarding the relocation of an underground flood channel. The EIR must be revised to state the complete extent of off-site improvements required to implement the proposed project and also include a figure Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 3 ends

EthanaciRd Elhanac Rd
ConFlip Bricoin ATM
KuffeRd
Floyd Ave:

Esker yard
Racific Mable!
Structures, Inc
McLaughlin f
depicting the off-site improvements in order to provide an adequate informational document and comply with CEQA's requirements for meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)).

4.2 Air Quality, 4.5 Energy, and 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Please refer to an attachment from SWAPE for a full technical commentary and analysis.

The EIR does not include for analysis relevant environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts, including cumulative impacts from the proposed project. According to CalEnviroScreen

4.0', CalEPA's screening tool that ranks each census tract in the state for pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability, the proposed project's census tract 6065042731) is highly burdened by pollution. The surrounding community, including existing residences adjacent to the north (share property line with the proposed project) on Floyd Avenue, bears the impact of multiple sources of pollution and is more polluted than average on several pollution indicator measured by CalEnviroScreen. For example, the project census tract ranks in the 91st percentile for ozone burden, the 51st percentile for particulate matter (PM) 2.5 burden, and 74th percentile for traffic burden. These environmental factors are attributed to heavy truck activity in the area. Ozone can cause lung irritation, inflammation, and worsening of existing chronic health conditions, even at low levels of exposure? . Exhaust fumes contain toxic chemicals that can damage DNA, cause cancer, make breathing difficult, and cause low weight and premature births? https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/11d2f52282a54ceebcac7428e6184203/page/CalEnviroScreen- 4 0/
^ОЕННА Ozone https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/air-quality-ozone 3ОЕННА Traffic https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/traffic-density Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 4 ends

Further, the census tract is a diverse community including 60% Hispanic, 6% African-American, and 2% Asian-American residents, whom are especially vulnerable to the impacts of pollution. The community has a high rate of low educational attainment, meaning 79% of the census tract residents over age 25 has not attained a high school diploma. The community also has a high rate of poverty, meaning 47% of the households in the census tract have a total income before taxes that is less than the poverty level. Income can affect health when people cannot afford healthy living and working conditions, nutritious food and necessary medical care 4 . Poor communities are often located in areas with high levels of pollution. Poverty can cause stress that weakens the immune system and causes people to become ill from pollution. Living in poverty is also an indication that residents may lack health insurance or access to medical care. Medical care is vital for this census tract as it ranks in the 78th percentile for incidence of cardiovascular disease and 49th percentile for incidence of asthma.

Additionally, the census tract adjacent to the project site (6065042901 (north) is identified as an SB 535 Disadvantaged Community. . This indicates that cumulative impacts of development and environmental impacts in the immediate vicinity are disproportionately impacting this community.

The negative environmental, health, and quality of life impacts resulting form a saturation of the warehousing and logistics industry in the community have become distinctly inequitable. A revised EIR must be prepared to include the specific analysis of each environmental impact on the Disadvantaged Community, including cumulative analysis and irreversible environmental effects.

The State of California lists three approved compliance modeling softwares for non-residential buildings: CBECC-Com, EnergyPro, and IES VE. CalEEMod is not listed as an approved software. The CalEEMod modeling does not comply with the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and under-reports the project's significant Energy impacts and fuel consumption to the public and decision makers. Since the EIR did not accurately or adequately model the energy impacts in compliance with Title 24, a finding of significance must be made. A revised EIR with modeling using one of the approved software types must be prepared and circulated for public review in order to adequately analyze the project's significant environmental impacts. This is vital as the EIR utilizes CalEEMod as a source in its methodology and analysis, which is clearly not an approved software.
4ОЕННА Poverty https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/poverty 5 Ibid.
' Ibid
OHHA SB 535 Census Tracts https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/sb535 & California Energy Commission 2022 Energy Code Compliance Software https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2022- building-energy-efficiency-l
Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 5 ends

Table 4.7-3: Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions demonstrates that the unmitigated project operations will generate 3,378 MTCO2e annually and implements Mitigation Measures GHG-1 and GHG-2 to allegedly mitigate these significant and unavoidable impacts:
"MM GHG-1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit or tenant occupancy permits, the City of Menifee Building and Safety Division shall confirm that the Project does not include conveyance of natural gas utility lines. The purpose of this mitigation measure is to reduce GHG emissions from natural gas.

MM GHG-2 All outdoor cargo handling equipment (such as yard trucks, hostlers, yard goats, pallet jacks, and forklifts) shall be zero emission (i.e., powered by electricity or other alternative fuels).

The warehouse buildings shall include the necessary charging stations for cargo handling equipment. The building manager or their designee shall be responsible for enforcing these requirements."
Notably, the EIR has not provided meaningful evidence or analysis to support the conclusion that Mitigation Measures GHG-1 and GHG-2 will reduce GHG emissions to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures GHG-1 and GHG-2 are also unenforceable mitigation in violation of CEQA § 21081.6 (b). It is not possible for the lead agency to ensure that Mitigation Measures GHG-1 and GHG-2 will result in reduced GHG emissions (as specified in Table 4.7-3) and be implemented continuously, at all times, throughout the life of the project and maintain a GHG reduction to less than significant levels at all times.

Further, the EIR maintains throughout the document that, "The proposed warehouse uses are considered speculative in nature," meaning that the future tenants are unknown. Since the tenants are unknown, there is no possible assurance that MM GHG-2 will result in any quantified GHG emissions reduction as the type of work to be conducted is unknown.

The efficacy of the proposed mitigation measures and reduction of GHG impacts below the applicable thresholds cannot be assured, and the project's GHG impact is therefore considered significant and unavoidable. A revised EIR must be prepared to include a finding of significance because there is no possible assurance of the percentage of achievable GHG reduction associated with the mitigation measures and mitigation of the project's GHG impact to less than significant is not feasible.

Brandon Cleary
July 17,2024

Page 6 ends

4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The EIR does not disclose that the project site (APN 331-060-020) is within Compatibility Zone E of the Perris Valley Airport ALUCP°. The EIR must be revised to include this for analysis in order to provide an adequate informational document. The EIR states that, "the entire Project site is located within Compatibility Zone E of the March Air Reserve Base." The EIR concludes that the project will have less than significant impacts because, "All new development would be in accordance with the Compatibility Zone E and all state, county, and local goals, policies, and regulations." The EIR does not provide any analysis or information regarding regulations and requirements within influence area Zone E of the Perris Valley Airport or Zone E of the March Air Reserve Base. The EIR has not provided any meaningful evidence to support its claims of consistency and a finding of significance must be made in a revised EIR.

4.10 Land Use and Planning
The EIR does not meaningfully discuss or analyze the project's compliance with the General Plan's Land Use Buildout Scenario. Exhibit LU-4: Land Use Buildout Summary within the General Plan Land Use Element'° analyzes a 0.40 FAR for Industrial development within EDC- NG and 25,020,987 square feet of non-retail development within all EDC areas. The project site as a FAR of 0.453, which is greater than the assumption of the environmental analysis which it attempts to tier from. The proposed project would increase the maximum allowable non-retail development within the ED and the EIR has not provided any information or analysis on this topic. The EIR has not provided evidence that the growth generated by the proposed project was anticipated by the General Plan, RTP/SCS, or AQMP. The EIR must be revised to provide an accurate build-out scenario of the City's General Plan, including analysis of the proposed project's increase in building area of non-retail development.

Table 4.10-3: Project Compatibility with SCAG's Connect SoCal Strategies concludes that the project is consistent with the goals of Connect SoCal, resulting in less than significant impacts.

Due to errors in modeling and modeling without supporting evidence, as noted throughout this comment letter and attachments, the proposed project is directly inconsistent with Goal 5 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality, Goal 6 to support healthy and equitable https://rcaluc.org/sites/g/files/aldnop421/files/migrated/Portals-13-19-20--20Vol.-201-20Perris- 20Vallev-20-Final-Mar.2011-.pdf
10 Menifee General Plan Land Use Element
https://www.cityofinenifee.us/DocumentCenter/View/14701/FINAL_Land-Use-Element_11322 Brandon Cleary
July 17,2024

Page 7 ends

communities, and Goal 7 to adapt to a changing climate. The EIR must be revised to include finding of significance due to inconsistency with the RTP/SCS.

The EIR does not provide a consistency analysis with all land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Further, Table 4.10-4:

Consistency with the City of Menifee General Plan includes consistency analysis that is erroneous and misleading to the public and decision makers. The EIR is inadequate as an informational document and a revised EIR must be prepared with a consistency analysis with all General Plan policies, including but not limited to the following:

1. Goal S-7: A community that has protected its sensitive structures, functions, and populations from the risks associated with climate change.

2. Policy S-7.1: Continue to require environmental analysis for proposed projects which may produce harmful levels of greenhouse gas.

3. Policy EJ-3.6: Continue to collaborate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Air Resources Board (CARB), utility providers, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and nonprofit organizations, neighborhoods groups, and other community organizations to improve air quality, food availability, renewable energy systems, sustainable land use and reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs).

4. Policy C-5.3: Support efforts to reduce/eliminate the negative environmental impacts of goods movement.

5. Goal OSC-10: An environmentally aware community that is responsive to changing climate conditions and actively seeks to reduce local greenhouse gas emissions.

6. Policy OCS-10.1: Align the city's local GHG reduction targets to be consistent with the statewide GHG reduction target of AB 32.

7. Policy OCS-10.2: Align the city's long-term GHG reduction goal consistent with the statewide GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05.

8. Policy OCS-10.3: Participate in regional greenhouse gas emission reduction initiatives.

9. Policy OCS-10.4: Consider impacts to climate change as a factor in evaluation of policies, strategies, and projects

10. Policy C-5.3: Support efforts to reduce/eliminate the negative environmental impacts of goods movement.

Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 8 ends

Table 4.13-2: Summary of Intersection Operation; Recommended Improvements and Table 4.13- 3: Summary of Roadway Segment Analysis with Recommended Improvements conclude the following intersections and roadway segments require improvements to address the deficiencies per the applicable thresholds:

1. Intersection #1: Evans Road at Ethanac Road

2. Intersection #3: I-215 SB Ramps at Ethanac Road

3. Intersection #4: I-215 NB Ramps at Ethanac Road

4. Ethanac Road Segment: Evans Road to Case Road

5. Ethanac Road Segment: Case Road to I-215 SB Ramps

6. Ethanac Road Segment: I-215 SB Ramps to I-215 NB Ramps Table 4.13-4: Project Fair Share Contributions provides a list of fair-share calculations for improvements that will allegedly mitigate significant and unavoidable impacts to the intersections/roadway segments to less than significant levels. It must be noted that the impacts to the intersections and roadway segments are located in the City of Perris, and the I-215 is a Caltrans facility. For example, the north side of Ethanac Road is under jurisdiction of Perris (Intersections #1, #3, and #4), and once Ethanac Road reaches Barnett, the entirety of Ethanac Road is under jurisdiction of Perris (Intersection #4 and above listed road segments). Any improvements planned/constructed or in-lieu fees/fair share fees paid for City of Perris or Caltrans facilities are beyond the control/scope of the lead agency. An assessment of fees is appropriate when linked to a specific mitigation program. (Anderson First Coalition v. City of Anderson (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 1173, Save our Peninsula Comm. v. Monterey County Bd. Of Supers. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 99, 141.) Payment of fees is not sufficient where there is no evidence mitigation will actually result. (Gray v. County of Madera (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1099,1122.) The assessment of fees here is not adequate as there is no evidence mitigation will actually result. The improvements associated with the fair-share fees are not planned to occur at all or by any certain date, whether by the City of Perris or Caltrans. Any improvements recommended or fees paid to mitigate impacts for City of Perris or Caltrans facilities are beyond the control of the lead agency and evidence that these improvements will be completed or approved by Perris or Caltrans has not been provided. A revised EIR must be prepared to include the LOS analysis as cumulatively considerable significant impact as the project conflicts with Transportation Impact Threshold 4.13- 1 and Land Use and Planning Impact Threshold 4.10-2 because it is not consistent with the following General Plan Policy:

1. Policy C-1.2: Require development to mitigate its traffic impacts and achieve a peak hour Level of Service (LOS) D or better at intersections, except at constrained intersections at close proximity to the I-215 where LOS E may be permitted.

Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 9 ends

4.13 Transportation
Table 4.13-2: Summary of Intersection Operation; Recommended Improvements and Table 4.13- 3: Summary of Roadway Segment Analysis with Recommended Improvements conclude the following intersections and roadway segments require improvements to address the deficiencies per the applicable thresholds:

1. Intersection #1: Evans Road at Ethanac Road

2. Intersection #3: I-215 SB Ramps at Ethanac Road

3. Intersection #4: I-215 NB Ramps at Ethanac Road

4. Ethanac Road Segment: Evans Road to Case Road

5. Ethanac Road Segment: Case Road to I-215 SB Ramps

Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 10 ends

The EIR has underreported the quantity VMT generated by the proposed project operations. The operational nature of industrial/warehouse uses involves high rates of truck/trailer/delivery van VMT due to traveling from large import hubs to regional distribution centers to smaller industrial parks and then to their final delivery destinations. Once employees arrive at work at the proposed project, they will conduct their jobs by driving delivery vans across the region as part of the daily operations as a warehouse, which will drastically increase project-generated VMI. The project's truck/trailer and delivery van activity is unable to utilize public transit or active transportation and it is misleading to the public and decision makers to exclude this activity from VMT analysis. The project's total operational VMT generated is further inconsistent with the significance threshold and legislative intent of SB 743 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing VMT. A revised EIR must be prepared to reflect a quantified VMT analysis that includes all truck/trailer and delivery van activity.

The EIR has not adequately analyzed the project's potential to substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses; or the project's potential to result in inadequate emergency access. There are no exhibits adequately depicting the available maneuvering and queueing space for trucks/trailers at the intersection of the project driveways and the adjacent streets. There are several potential areas for conflicts between trucks/trailers and passenger cars. For example, there is only one vehicle access point on Barnett Road and it will serve both passenger cars and trucks/trailers. There is no analysis regarding the available queuing and maneuvering space to accommodate both types of vehicles.

Additionally, the central driveway along Evans Road that provides truck/trailer and passenger car access to both buildings has not been analyzed for potential conflicts. The curved driveways provide access to the truck/trailer loading docks and converge with the driveway for a passenger car parking lot for Building 2. There is no modeling to demonstrate that these curved driveways provide adequate queueing and/or maneuvering space for trucks/trailers to access the site. There is no information or analysis regarding potential traffic control requirements (stop signs, etc) necessary to control the flow of traffic and eliminate conflicts between trucks/trailers and passenger cars. A revised EIR must be prepared to include truck turning templates overlaid on the Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 11 ends

Site Plan for each building for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

BLDG.

AN-S
The EIR states that, "All circulation improvements would be constructed as approved by the City's Public Works Department. Additionally, the Project would be constructed in accordance with Menifee MC Section 9.160.050." The EIR also does not provide any exhibits depicting emergency vehicle access and makes a similar statement regarding emergency access in stating that, "the Menifee Fire Department (MFD), would review all new development plans, and future development is required to conform to all fire protection and prevention requirements, including, but not limited to, building setbacks, emergency access, and fire flow. Following compliance with MFD access requirements, adequate emergency access to the Project site would be provided." The EIR does not provide a list of requirements or demonstrate how the project complies with these Municipal Code Sections or MFD requirements. This does not comply with CEQA's requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)).

Deferring this environmental analysis required by CEQA to the construction permitting phase is improper mitigation and does not comply with CEQA's requirement for meaningful disclosure and adequate informational documents. A revised EIR must be prepared to include exhibits with truck turning templates and emergency access analysis overlaid on the Site Plan for review, Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 12 ends

analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

Additionally, the EIR has not provided any analysis of the available horizontal and vertical sight distance at the intersection of the project driveways and adjacent streets. Sight distance is the continuous length of street ahead visible to the driver. At unsignalized intersections, corner sight distance must provide a substantially clear line of sight between the driver of the vehicle waiting on the minor road (driveway) and the driver of an approaching vehicle. The EIR states that, "Sight distance at Project access points would comply with applicable sight distance standards and no sharp curves are proposed as part of the Project design." However, the EIR does not provide a list of requirements or demonstrate how the project complies with them. This does not comply with CEQA's requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). Deferring this environmental analysis required by CEQA to the construction permitting phase is improper mitigation and does not comply with CEQA's requirement for meaningful disclosure and adequate informational documents. A revised EIR must be prepared with this analysis based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Stopping Sight Distance requirements.

5.2 Significant and Irreversible Environmental Changes, 5.3 Growth-Inducing Impacts, and

5.4 Mandatory Findings of Significance
The EIR relies upon erroneous Energy modeling to determine that the project will meet sustainability requirements. As noted above, the EIR did not model the project's energy consumption in compliance with Title 24 modeling software. The EIR must be revised to include a finding of significance due to the an inaccurate and erroneous analysis regarding the project's Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy impacts, including those significant and unavoidable cumulatively considerable GHG impacts.

The EIR does not adequately discuss or and analyze the commitment of resources is not consistent with regional and local growth forecasts. As noted throughout this comment letter, the project represents a significant amount of building area growth in the City and a significant amount of the City's employment growth over 29 years. The EIR does not meaningfully discuss or analyze the project's compliance with the General Plan's Land Use Buildout Scenario. Exhibit LU-4: Land Use Buildout Summary within the General Plan Land Use Element" analyzes a 0.40 FAR for Industrial development within EDC-NG and 25,020,987 square feet of non-retail development " Menifee General Plan Land Use Element
https://www.cityofmenifee.us/DocumentCenter/View/14701/FINAL_Land-Use-Element_11322 Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 13 ends

within all EDC areas. The project site as a FAR of 0.453, which is greater than the assumption of the environmental analysis which it attempts to tier from. The proposed project would increase the maximum allowable non-retail development within the EDC and the EIR has not provided any information or analysis on this topic. The EIR has not provided evidence that the growth generated by the proposed project was anticipated by the General Plan, RTP/SCS, or AQMP. The EIR must be revised to provide an accurate build-out scenario of the City's General Plan, including analysis of the proposed project's increase in building area of non-retail development.

The EIR has not provided an adequate or accurate cumulative analysis discussion here to demonstrate the impact of the proposed project in a cumulative setting. SCAG's Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast? notes that the City will add 15,400 jobs between 2016 - 2045. Utilizing the SCAG Employment Density Study calculation of 694 employees, the project represents 4.5% of the City's employment growth from 2016 - 2045. A single project accounting for this amount of the projected employment growth over 29 years represents a significant amount of growth. A revised EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since 2016 and projects "in the pipeline" to determine if the project will exceed SCAG's employment growth forecast for the City. For example, other recent industrial projects '3 such as Menifee Commerce Center (2,885 employees), Menifee Commerce Center Phase II (1,962 employees), Northern Gateway Commerce Center (2,267 employees), Ares Warehouse on Murrieta (952 employees), Capstone Industrial (1,205 employees), Wheat Warehouse (151 employees), Corsica Business Park (477 employees), Trumble and Watson Warehouse (571 employees), McLaughlin San Jacinto Warehouses (846 employees), Mapes and Sherman Warehouse (478 employees), United Carports Warehouse (105 employees), Motte Business Center (1,964 employees), Ethanac and Barnett Warehouse (440 employees), CADO Menifee (860 employees), Compass Northern Gateway (599 employees), and Ares Murrieta Road Warehouse (652 employees) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 17,353 employees, which is 112% of the City's employment growth forecast over 29 years accounted for by 18 industrial projects submitted since 2020. This exceeds the projected growth forecast for the City. This number increases exponentially when the City's commercial development activity and other projects since 2016 (SCAG) and 2013 (General Plan) 12 SCAG Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast adopted September 3, 2020 https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and-growth- forecast.pdf?1606001579
13 Data for all listed projects via City of Menifee Land Development Projects Map https://cityofmenifee.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/minimalist/index.html?appid=55fc56d4eee94e588a28 a958cebac908 and Accela Menifee https://aca-
prod.accela.com/MENIFEE/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Planning& TabName=Planning& TabList=Hom %7C0%7CPermits%7C1%7CEngineering%7C2%7CPlanning%7C3%7CFire%7C4%7CCurrentTablnde x%7C3
Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 14 ends

are added to the calculation. A revised EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on this topic in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

7.4 Effects Found Not to be Significant: Population and Housing Construction of the Project would generate temporary employment opportunities, including short- term design, engineering, and construction jobs. Construction related jobs would not result in a significant population increase because those jobs are temporary in nature and are expected to be filled by persons within the local area. This expectation is based on the latest unemployment data for Riverside County6 (4.5 percent) and the City of Menifee7 (4.2 percent).

The EIR utilizes uncertain language and does not provide any meaningful analysis or supporting evidence to substantiate the conclusion that there will be no significant impact to population and housing. The EIR only discusses the construction related jobs and states that, "Construction related jobs would not result in a significant population increase because those jobs are temporary in nature and are expected to be filled by persons within the local area. This expectation is based on the latest unemployment data for Riverside County (4.5 percent) and the City of Menifee (4.2 percent)." Notably, the geographic boundaries of the "local area" are undefined and will result in the project attracting a workforce that is exponentially further in distance than the 22.0 VMT utilized in the EIR to conclude less than significant VMT impacts.

The EIR relies upon the unemployment rates for the entire Riverside County area to provide employees for the project, but does not provide evidence that the specific workforce listed is qualified for or interested in construction work to substantiate this claim. Relying on the unemployed workforce population of the surrounding region will increase project related VMT and emissions during all phases of construction and operations and a revised EIR must be prepared to account for longer worker trip distances. Additionally, an unemployment rate below 5% is considered full employment and does not substantiate the EIR's claims that impacts will be less than significant.

The EIR has not provided any quantified analysis here of the project's operational employment generation. SCAG's Employment Density Study" provides the following applicable employment generation rates for Riverside County:

Warehouse: 1 employee per 581 square feet
Office: 1 employee per 481 square feet
14 SCAG Employment Density Study
http://www.mwcog.org/file.aspx?A=QTTITR24PO00UIw5mPNzK8F4d8djdJe4LF9Exj6IXOU%3D Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 15 ends

Applying these ratios results in the following calculation:

Warehouse: 377,252 sf / 581 sf = 650 employees
Office: 21,000 sf / 481 sf = 44 employees
Total: 694 employees
Utilizing SCAG's Employment Density Study ratios, the proposed project will generate 694 employees. The MND utilizes uncertain and misleading language which does not provide any meaningful analysis of the project's population and employment generation. In order to comply with CEQA's requirements for meaningful disclosure, an EIR must be prepared to provide an accurate estimate of employees generated by all uses of the proposed project. It must also provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers to fill these positions.

The EIR also states that, "the Project site is served by existing public roadways, and utility infrastructure would be installed beneath the public rights-of-way that abut the Project site." This statement is erroneous and misleading to the public and decision makers and must be removed and replaced with factual project components as part of a revised EIR. For example, the Site Plan depicts that a new street will need to be constructed to serve the south side of the project site and is referred to as "A Street" within the EIR. While the EIR is also deficient as it does not provide a figure depicting all off-site improvements, the entirety of Evans Road from Ethanac Road to McLaughlin Road is currently unimproved (unpaved dirt) and will need to be constructed in order to serve the proposed project. Additionally, more than 50% of the land within the vicinity of the project site is vacant, meaning that the project site is not located in a developed area of the City and is not located adjacent to existing roads. The EIR must be revised to state factual project components as part of a revised EIR.
thanac Rd Ethanac h
CoinFlip Bitcoin ATM
skeryard
Brandon Cleary
July 17, 2024

Page 16 ends

SCAG's Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast'S notes that the City will add 15,400 jobs between 2016 - 2045. Utilizing the SCAG Employment Density Study calculation of 694 employees, the project represents 4.5% of the City's employment growth from 2016 - 2045. A single project accounting for this amount of the projected employment growth over 29 years represents a significant amount of growth. A revised EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since 2016 and projects "in the pipeline" to determine if the project will exceed SCAG's employment growth forecast for the City. For example, other recent industrial projects' such as Menifee Commerce Center (2,885 employees), Menifee Commerce Center Phase II (1,962 employees), Northern Gateway Commerce Center (2,267 employees), Ares Warehouse on Murrieta (952 employees), Capstone Industrial (1,205 employees), Wheat Warehouse (151 employees), Corsica Business Park (477 employees), Trumble and Watson Warehouse (571 employees), McLaughlin San Jacinto Warehouses (846 employees), Mapes and Sherman Warehouse (478 employees), United Carports Warehouse (105 employees), Motte Business Center (1,964 employees), Ethanac and Barnett Warehouse (440 employees), CADO Menifee (860 employees), Compass Northern Gateway (599 employees), and Ares Murrieta Road Warehouse (652 employees) combined with the proposed project will cumulatively generate 17,353 employees, which is 112% of the City's employment growth forecast over 29 years accounted for by 18 industrial projects submitted since 2020. This exceeds the projected growth forecast for the City. This number increases exponentially when the City's commercial development activity and other projects since 2016 (SCAG) and 2013 (General Plan) are added to the calculation. A revised EIR must be prepared to include a cumulative analysis on this topic in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the EIR is flawed and a revised EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 15 SCAG Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast adopted September 3, 2020 https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and-growth- forecast.pdf?1606001579
16 Data for all listed projects via City of Menifee Land Development Projects Map https://cityofimenifee.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/minimalist/index.html?appid=55fc56d4eee94e588a28 a958cebac908 and Accela Menifee https://aca-
prod.accela.com/MENIFEE/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Planning&TabName=Planning&TabList=Hom e%7C0%7CPermits%7C1%7CEngineering%7C2%7CPlanning%7C3%7CFire%7C4%7CCurrentTablnde Brandon Cleary
July 17,2024

Page 17 ends

79222 Corona, CA 92877.

Sincerely,
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
Attachment: SWAPE Analysis
SWAPE Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
July 16, 2024
Gary Ho
Blum, Collins & Ho LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 4880
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on the Northern Gateway Logistics Center Project (SCH No. 2021110379) Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the May 2024 Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") for the Northern Gateway Logistics Center ("Project") located in the City of Menifee ('City"). The Project proposes to construct 398,252-square-feet ("SF") of industrial space, including one building consisting of 6,000-SF of office space and 99,547-SF of warehouse space and a second building consisting of 8,000-SF of office space and 277,715-SF of warehouse space, on the 20.17-acre site.

Our review concludes that the DEIR fails to adequately evaluate the Project's hazards, hazardous materials, air quality, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project may be underestimated and inadequately addressed. A revised Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential hazards, hazardous materials, air quality, and greenhouse gas impacts that the project may have on the environment.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Inadequate Disclosure and Analysis of Impacts
The DEIR relies on a 2023 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA, included as Appendix H) to determine hazardous and hazardous materials impacts. The Phase I ESA found that the Project site has been utilized for agricultural purposes from as early as 1938.

The DEIR concluded that "pesticides or other agricultural chemicals may have been applied on the project site" (p. 4.8-9). The DEIR further states that "If residual concentrations of these chemicals is present, it is unlikely that they would be the subject of regulatory scrutiny in the context of a non- residential land use scenario" (p. 4.8-9). The DEIR and the Phase I ESA do not document any soil sampling results to substantiate this conclusion. To provide an adequate basis to support the claim that residual concentrations of pesticides do not constitute an impact, soil sampling would need to be conducted.

Because they are persistent in the environment, pesticides - including DDT and DDE - may be present in Project site soils. Exposure to DDT can result in headaches, nausea, and seizures. The U.S. EPA identifies DDT and DDE as probable human carcinogens.?
To provide an adequate basis for determining impacts, a revised DEIR needs to be prepared to include the results of a soil sampling program for residual concentrations of pesticides at the Project site. Any contamination that is identified above regulatory screening levels, including California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment's Soil Screening Numbers, should be further evaluated and cleaned up, if necessary, in coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the California Department of Toxics Substances Control.

Air Quality
Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The DEIR's air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with the California Emissions Estimator Model ("CalEEMod") Version 2020.4.0 (p. 4.2-17).4 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project-specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act ("'CEQA") requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.

Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose which parameters are used in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions by identifying any changes to default values.

Justifications are provided for each altered value.

When reviewing the Project's CalEEMod output files, provided in the Air Quality Assessment ("AQ Report") as Appendix B1 to the DEIR, we found that several model inputs were not consistent with information disclosed in the DEIR. As a result, the Project's construction and operational emissions may be underestimated. A revised EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality.
1 "DDT, DDE, and DDD." ToxFAQs, April 2022, available at: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tfacts35.pdf 2 Ibid.
3 "Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO)," Department of Toxic Substances Control, available at:
https://dtsc.ca.gov/human-health-risk-hero/
4 "CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/download-model.
2 Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Northern Gateway Logistics Center Detailed Report" model includes changes to the default construction schedule (see excerpt below) (Appendix B1, pp. 108):

8. User Changes to Default Data
Justification
Construction: Construction Phases Per Industrial Questionnaire.

Operations: Vehicle Data Per Trip Gen
Land Use Lot acreago is adjusted to cover project site
Construction: Off-Road Equipment Added equipment for trenching.

Construction: Dust From Material Movement Per Industrial Questionnaire.

As a result of these changes, the model includes the following construction schedule (see except below) (Appendix B1, pp. 145, 146):

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Site Preparation Site Preparation 11/1/2024 12/31/2024 5.00 43.0 Grading Grading 11/30/2024 228/2025 5.00 65.0
Building Construction Budding Construction 2/1/2025 10/31/2025 5.00 195 Paving Paving 2/1/2025 9/30/2025 5.00 172
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/1/2025 1031/2025 5.00 66.0 Infrastructure Trenching 3/1/2025 6/30/2025 5.00 86.0
Improvements
The CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.5 As shown in the "User Changes to Default Data" table, the justification provided for this change is:
"Per Industrial Questionnaire" (Appendix B1, pp. 108).

Regarding the Project's construction duration, the DEIR states:
"The Project is anticipated to be developed in one phase. Should the Project be approved, construction is anticipated to occur over a duration of approximately 12 months, beginning in November 2024. The Project is expected to be completed in late 2025" (p. 2-4).

The changes to the individual construction phase lengths, however, are unsubstantiated. While the DEIR justifies a total length of Project construction of 12 months, the DEIR fails to mention the individual construction phase lengths whatsoever. Until the individual construction phase lengths are substantiated, the model should have included proportionately altered individual phase lengths to match the proposed construction duration of 12 months.® 5 "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14.
6 See Attachment A for proportionately altered construction schedule.

CalEEMod uses construction phase lengths to calculate the Project's construction emissions. Each construction phase is associated with different emissions activities (see excerpt below).? Demolition involves removing buildings or structures.

Site Preparation involves clearing vegetation (grubbing and tree/stump removal) and removing stones and other unwanted material or debris prior to grading.

Grading involves the cut and fill of land to ensure that the proper base and slope is created for the foundation.

Building Construction involves the construction of the foundation, structures and buildings.

Architectural Coating involves the application of coatings to both the interior and exterior of buildings or structures, the painting of parking lot or parking garage striping, associated signage and curbs, and the painting of the walls or other components such as stair railings Paving involves the laying of concrete or asphalt such as in parking lots, roads, driveways, or sidewalks.

By disproportionately altering and extending some of the individual construction phase lengths without proper justification, the model assumes there are a greater number of days to complete the construction activities required by the prolonged phases. There will be less construction activities required per day and, consequently, less pollutants emitted per day. Until we are able to verify the revised construction schedule, the model may underestimate the peak daily emissions associated with some phases of construction and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact To more accurately estimate the Project's construction-related emissions, we prepared an updated CalEEMod model, using the Project-specific information provided by the DEIR. In our updated model, we proportionately altered the construction phase lengths to match the total construction duration of 12 months.® All other values were consistent with the DEIR's model.

Our updated analysis estimates that the Project's construction-related volatile organic compound ("VOC") emissions exceed the applicable SCAQMD thresholds of 75-pounds per day (Ibs/day"), respectively, as referenced by the DEIR (p. 4.2-23, Table 4.2-8) (see table below). 7 "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide.p. 32.
8 See Attachment A for construction calculations and Attachment B for the updated CalEEMod model. 4 VOC
Construction
(Ibs/day)
DEIR 60.67
SWAPE 292.3
% Increase 382%
SCAQMD Threshold 75
Exceeds? Yes
Construction-related VOC emissions, as estimated by SWAPE, increase by approximately 381.8%, and exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold. Our model demonstrates that the Project would result in a potentially significant air quality impact that was not previously identified or addressed by the DEIR. A revised EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality impacts that the Project may have on the environment.

Greenhouse Gas
Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The DEIR estimates that the Project would generate net annual greenhouse gas (GHG") emissions of 2,696 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year ("MT COze/year"), which would not exceed the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO_e/year (see excerpt below) (p. 4.7-20, Table 4.7-3).

Table 4.7-3: Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions
MTCOye per Year
Emissions Source
Unmitigated Mitigated
Area and Indirect Sources
Construction Amortized Over 30 Years 36 36
Area Source 8
Energy - Electricity 372 372
Energy - Natural Gas
off-road - Yard Trucks 39 10
Off-Road - Forklifts 311 69
Emergency Backup Generator 21 21
waste 117 117
water and Wastewater 223 223
Mobile Sources
Trucks 816 816
Passenger Cars 1,024 1,024
Total 3,378 2,696
Threshold 3,000 3,000
Exceeds Threshold? yes No
MM GHG-1 prohibit. the use of natural e
MM GHG-2 reques all off-road equipment (such as yard trucks and forklifts) to be zero emission (i.e, powered by clectricity or oth alternative fuels). The warehouse buiding shall indude the necessary charging stations for cargo handling equipment. The building manager or their designee shall be responsible for enforcing these requirements. The project shall use electric equipment for off-road equipment

3. Off-road equipment electricity emissions are incorparated into the energy-electricity category.

Source: Ibid. Page 26 - Table 4
The DEIR concludes:
5 "As shown in Table 4.7-3, mitigation measures would reduce Project GHG emissions by approximately 14 percent and total mitigated emissions (2,696 MTCO2e per year) would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, GHG emissions associated with the Project would be less than significant with implementation of MMs GHG-1 and GHG-2" (p. 4.7-21).

However, the DEIR's analysis, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is unsupported for two reasons:
(1) The DEIR's quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an outdated threshold; and (2) The DEIR's unsubstantiated air model indicates a potentially significant impact. 1) Reliance on an Outdated Quantitative GHG Threshold
The DEIR estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,696 MT COze/year, which would not exceed the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT COze/year (p. 48, Table 4.7-3).

However, the guidance that provided the 3,000 MT COze/year threshold, the SCAQMD's 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was developed when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as "AB 32", was the governing statute for GHG reductions in California. AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.° AEP guidance states:
"[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be revised based on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and reduction potentials out to the next GHG reduction milestone." 10
As it is currently July 2024, thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed Project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. The SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT COze/year is therefore outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the DEIR's less-than- significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Instead, we recommend that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 service population efficiency target of 3.0 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per service population per year ("MT CO›e/SP/year"), which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets. "
2) Failure to Identify a Potentially Significant GHG Impact In an effort to quantitatively evaluate the Project's GHG emissions, we compared the Project's GHG emissions, as estimated by the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis ("GHG Analysis"), provided as 9 "Health & Safety Code 38550." California State Legislature, January 2007, available at:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=38550. 10 "Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California. " Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), October 2016, available at:
https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016 Final White Paper.pdf, p. 39. 11 "Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15." SCAQMD, September 2010, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa- significance-thresholds/vear-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 6 Appendix G to the DEIR, to the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT COze/SP/year. When applying this threshold, the Project's unsubstantiated air model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact.

The GHG Analysis estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,696 MT COze/year (p. 48, Table 4.7-3). According to CAPCOA's CEQA & Climate Change report, a service population ("SP") is defined as "the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project."12 According to the DEIR, the estimated number of employees to operate the warehouses would be approximately 423 people (p. 4.15-17). When dividing the Project's net annual GHG emissions, as estimated by the DEIR, by an SP of 423 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 6.37 MT COze/SP/year (see table below). 13 Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Annual Emissions (MT COze/year) 2,696
Service Population 423
Service Population Efficiency (MT COze/SP/year) 6.37
SCAQMD 2035 Target 3.0
Exceeds? Yes
The Project's service population efficiency value exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT COze/SP/year, indicating a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by the DEIR. As a result, the DEIR's less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. A revised EIR should be prepared, including an updated GHG analysis and incorporating additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project's GHG emissions to less-than-significant levels.

Mitigation
Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions According to CEQA Guidelines § 15096(g)(2):
"When an updated EIR has been prepared for a project, the Responsible Agency shall not approve the project as proposed if the agency finds any feasible alternative or feasible mitigation measures within its powers that would substantially lessen or avoid any significant effect the project would have on the environment."
The DEIR is consequently required under CEQA to implement all feasible mitigation to reduce the Project's potential impacts. As demonstrated in the sections above, the Project would result in potentially significant air quality and greenhouse gas impacts that should be mitigated further. 12 "CEQA & Climate Change." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), January 2008, available at: https://www.ourair.org/wp-content/uploads/CAPCOA-CEQA-and-Climate-Change.pdf., p. 71-72. 13 Calculated: (2,696 MT CO›e/year) / (423 service population) = (6.37 MT CO›e/SP/year). 7 First, in order to reduce the VOC emissions associated with Project construction, we recommend the DEIR consider incorporating the following mitigation measure from the California Department of Justice ("DOJ"): 14
• Require the use of super compliant, low-VOC paints less than 10g/L during the architectural coating construction phase and during Project maintenance.

Los Angeles County recommends: 15
• If paints and coatings with VOC content of 0 grams/liter to less than 10 grams/liter cannot be utilized, the developer shall avoid application of architectural coatings during the peak smog season: July, August, and September.

Second, in order to reduce the GHG emissions associated with the Project, we recommend several mitigation measures (see list below).

SCAG's 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR's Greenhouse Gas Project Level Mitigation Measures ("PMM-GHG-1") recommends:
• Measures that encourage transit use, carpooling, bike-share and car-share programs, active transportation, and parking strategies, including, but not limited to the following:

Promote transit-active transportation coordinated strategies; Increase bicycle carrying capacity on transit and rail vehicles; Improve or increase access to transit;
Increase access to common goods and services, such as groceries, schools, and day care; Incorporate the neighborhood electric vehicle network;
Orient the project toward transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities; Improve pedestrian or bicycle networks, or transit service; Provide traffic calming measures;
Provide bicycle parking;
Limit or eliminate park supply;
• Unbundle parking costs;
• Provide parking cash-out programs;
• Implement or provide access to commute reduction program; • Incorporate bicycle and pedestrian facilities into project designs, maintaining these facilities, and providing amenities incentivizing their use; and planning for and building local bicycle projects that connect with the regional network;
14 "Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act." State of California Department of Justice, September 2022, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 8 - 10. 15 "Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program." Los Angeles County Housing Element Update Program EIR.

August 2021, available at: https://planning.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Housing final-peir- mitigation-monitoring.pdf.
8 • Improving transit access to rail and bus routes by incentives for construction and transit facilities within developments, and/or providing dedicated shuttle service to transit stations; • Designate a percentage of parking spaces for ride-sharing vehicles or high-occupancy vehicles, and provide adequate passenger loading and unloading for those vehicles; • Require at least five percent of all vehicle parking spaces include electric vehicle charging stations, or at a minimum, require the appropriate infrastructure to facilitate sufficient electric charging for passenger vehicles and trucks to plug-in;
• Implement preferential parking permit program;
• Implement school pool and bus programs;
• Encourage telecommuting and alternative work schedules, such as:
• Staggered starting times;
• Flexible schedules;
• Compressed work weeks;
Implement commute trip reduction marketing, such as:

New employee orientation of trip reduction and alternative mode options; • Event promotions;
• Publications;
• Price workplace parking, such as:

Explicitly charging for parking for its employees;
• Implementing above market rate pricing;
Validating parking only for invited guests;
Not providing employee parking and transportation allowances; and • Educating employees about available alternatives;
• Adopting employer trip reduction measures to reduce employee trips such as vanpool and carpool programs, providing end-of-trip facilities, and telecommuting programs including but not limited to measures that:

Provide car-sharing, bike sharing, and ride-sharing programs; • Provide transit passes;
• Shift single occupancy vehicle trips to carpooling or vanpooling, for example providing ride-matching services;
• Provide incentives or subsidies that increase that use of modes other than single- occupancy vehicle;
Provide on-site amenities at places of work, such as priority parking for carpools and vanpools, secure bike parking, and showers and locker rooms; Provide employee transportation coordinators at employment sites; and Provide a guaranteed ride home service to users of non-auto modes.

The California Air Resources Board ("CARB") recommends: 16 16 "Recommended Air Pollution Emission Reduction Measures for Warehouses and Distribution Centers." CARB, August 2023, available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-08/CARB%20Comments%20- %20NOP%20for%20the%20%200ak%20Valley%20North%20Project%20DEIR.pdf; Attachment A, p. 5 - 8. 9 • Requiring all off-road diesel-powered equipment used during construction to be equipped with Tier 4 or cleaner engines, except for specialized construction equipment in which Tier 4 engines are not available. In place of Tier 4 engines, off-road equipment can incorporate retrofits, such that, emission reductions achieved are equal to or exceed that of a Tier 4 engine; • Requiring all heavy-duty trucks entering the construction site during the grading and building construction phases be model year 2014 or later. All heavy-duty haul trucks should also meet CARB's lowest optional low-oxides of nitrogen (NOx) standard starting in the year 2022; • Require all construction equipment and fleets to be in compliance with all current air quality regulations;
• Requiring all loading/unloading docks and trailer spaces be equipped with electrical hookups for trucks with transport refrigeration units (TRU) or auxiliary power units; • Requiring all TRUs entering the project-site be plug-in capable; • Requiring all service equipment (e.g., yard hostlers, yard equipment, forklifts, and pallet jacks) used within the project site to be zero-emission;
• Requiring future tenants to exclusively use zero-emission light and medium-duty delivery trucks and vans;
• Including contractual language in tenant lease agreements restricting trucks and support equipment from idling longer than two minutes while on site; and • Requiring the installing of vegetative walls or other effective barriers that separate loading docks and people living or working nearby.

The DOJ recommends: 17
• Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation capacity that is equal to or greater than the building's projected energy needs, including all electrical chargers;
• Designing all project building roofs to accommodate the maximum future coverage of solar panels and installing the maximum solar power generation capacity feasible; • Oversizing electrical rooms by 25 percent or providing a secondary electrical room to accommodate future expansion of electric vehicle charging capability; Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel; • Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking; • Designing to LEED green building certification standards; • Constructing zero-emission truck charging/fueling stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the project;
• Running conduit to designated locations for future electric truck charging stations; • Constructing and maintaining electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of employee parking spaces (for example, requiring at least 10% of all employee parking 17 Ibid. p. 9 - 10.
10 spaces to be equipped with electric vehicle charging stations of at least Level 2 charging performance);
• Running conduit to an additional proportion of employee parking spaces for a future increase in the number of electric light-duty charging stations;
• Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks; • Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations; • Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route; • Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses. Also require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request; • Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency's SmartWay program, and requiring tenants who own, operate, or hire trucking carriers with more than 100 trucks to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers; and
• Providing tenants with information on incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and Voucher Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets.

CEQA Guidelines 15126.4 (c)(3) include "[o]ffsite measures, including offsets that are not otherwise required, to mitigate a project's emissions" as an option for GHG mitigation. 18 An example of this was in the case of the Oakland Sports and Mixed-Use Project, where off-site reduction measures in the neighboring communities were recommended. 19 We recommend consideration of local carbon offset programs to reduce the Project's GHG impacts as a measure of last result.

As demonstrated above, we have provided several mitigation measures that would reduce Project- related VOC and GHG emissions developed from sources including SCAG, the DOJ and others. These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation.

A revised EIR should be prepared that includes all feasible mitigation measures, as well as updated air quality and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to the maximum extent feasible. The revised EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to 18 "Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14 § 15126.4." CEQA Guidelines, May 2024, available at:
https://casetext.com/regulation/california-code-of-regulations/title-14-natural-resources/division-6-resources- agency/chapter-3-guidelines-for-implementation-of-the-california-environmental-quality-act/article-9-contents-of- environmental-impact-reports/section-151264-consideration-and-discussion-of-mitigation-measures-proposed-to- minimize-significant-effects.
19 "Cal. Pub. Resources Code § 21168.6.7." 2023, available at: https://casetext.com/statute/california- codes/california-public-resources-code/division-13-environmental-quality/chapter-6-limitations/section-2116867- oakland-sports-and-mixed-use-project-conditions-for-approval-certification-of-project-for-streamlining. 11 the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project's potentially significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul Raufeld
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: Updated Construction Calculations
Attachment B: SWAPE's CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment C: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment D: Paul Rosenfeld CV
12 Attachment A
Construction Schedule Calculations
Default Phase Construction Construction Revised Phase
Phase Length Duration % Duration Length
Site Preparation 10 531 0.0188 338 6
Grading 30 531 0.0565 338 19
Building Construction 300 531 0.5650 338 191
Paving 531 0.0377 338 13
Architectural Coating 20 531 0.0377 338 13
Infrastructure Improveme 30 531 0.0565 338 19
Total Default Revised
Construction Construction
Duration Duration
Start Date 11/1/2024 11/1/2024
End Date 4/16/2026 10/5/2025
Total Days 531
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Attachment B Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Northern Gateway Logistics Center
Riverside-South Coast County, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 14.00 1000sqft 0.32 14,000.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 384.00 1000saft 11.20 384,252.00 Parking Lot 354.00 Space 3.19 0.00

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2025
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2 Intensity 390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033 N20 Intensity 0.004 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Land Use - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Construction Phase - See comment on: "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths", Off-road Equipment - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Trips and VMT - Consistent with DEIR"s model.

Grading - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Architectural Coating - Consistent with DEIR"s model.

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Vehicle Trips - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Energy Use - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Water And Wastewater - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
blArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Parking 0.00 22,504.00 tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00
tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 19.00
tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 19.00
tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 191.00
tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00
ib|ConstructionPhase umDays 20.00 13.00
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/14/2024 11/8/2024
tb|ConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/26/2024 12/5/2024
tb|ConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/6/2025 1/1/2025
tbIConstructionPhase Phase End Date 4/2/2026 9/25/2025
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/30/2026 10/14/2025
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/28/2026
tbiConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/15/2024 1119/2024 12/27/2024 1216/2024
tb/ConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate
b|ConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 217/2025 1/2/2025
bIConstructionPhase 4/3/2026 9/26/2025
... ..... 10/15/2025
tbiConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/1/2026
... ...
tbGrading AcresOfGrading 57.00 258.00
AcresOfGrading 9.00 64.50
tbiGrading
tbiGrading Material Exported 0.00 1,519.00
LandUseSquareFeet 384,000.00 384252.00
tblLandUse
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 141,600.00 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.82 11.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied blOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 84.00
bOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 78.00 367.00
blOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 4.00 tbITripsAndVMT Hauling TripNumber 150.00 2.92
tbiTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 33.00 5.00
tbiVehicle Trips ST_TR 2,21 0.00
tblVehicle Trips ST_TR 1.74 0.48
tbiVehicle Trips SU TR 0.70
tblVehicle Trips SU_TR 1.74 0.48
biVehicle Trips WD_TR 9.74 0.00
ibivehicle Trips WD_TR 1.74 0.48
ibiwater 0.00 1,669.00****-•••--

2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Year tons/yr мт/уг
2024 0 0863 0,8640 0.7333 1.7200e- 0,3700 0.0362 0,4063 0.1136 0.0333 0.1469 0.0000 150.9976 | 150.9976 0.0481 7.0000e- : 152.2218 005

5.2300e- -0.1169 : 468.4154 | 4684154 | 0.0618 T475.3229 003
Maximum 2.0946 1.5201 2.1881 5.2300e- 0.3700 0.0569 0.4063 0.1136 0.0535 0.1469 0.0000 468.4154 468.4154 0.0618 0.0180 475.3229 003
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 c02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Year tons/yr МТ/уг
2024 0 0863| 0.8640 0.7333 1.7200e- 0.3700 • 0.0362 0.4063 0.1136 0,0333 0.1469 0.0000 150.9975 | 150.9975 0.0481 7.0000e- 152.2216 005
Maximum 2.0946 1.5201 2.1881 5.2300e- 0.3700 0.0569 0.4063 0.1136 0.0535 0.1469 0.0000 468.4151 468.4151 0.0618 0.0180 475.3226 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOX cO S02 Total PM2.5 Bio-C02 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 CO2e Total
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 11-1-2024 1-31-2025 1.1681 1.1681
2-1-2025 4-30-2025 0.5375 0.5375
5-1-2025 7-31-2025 0.5534 0.5534
8-1-2025 9-30-2025 0.3551 0.3551
Highest 1.1681 1.1681

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOX cO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Bio- c02 NBio- Co2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total 042 5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Area 1.6246 9.0000e- 9.5700e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e. ! 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0187 0.0187 5.0000e- 0.0000 0.0199 005 003 005 005 005 005 005
Energy 44200е- 0.0402 0.0338 2.4000e- 3,0600e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 0.0000 224.6924 1 224.6924 0.0161 26500e- T 225.8859 003 004 003 003 003 003 003
03009 0.0798 2.0200e- 0.0818 0.0000 249.9673 249 9673 0.0120 0.0120 2538281 Mobile 0.0968 0.1643 1.0761 2.7000e- 0 2987 2.1500e-
003 003
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 75.9146 0.0000 75.9146 14,4864 0.0000 188.0751

0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 28.9616 213.8125 | 242.7741 T 2.9927 0.0724 1 339,1736 Water
Total 1.7257 0.2046 1,1195 2.9400e- 0.2987 5.2400e- 0.3040 0.0798 5.1100e- 0.0849 104.8761 688.4909 793.3670 7.5073 0.0870 1,006.982 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 | Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Area 1,6246 9.0000e- 9,5700e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0187 0.0187 5.0000e- 0,0000 0,0199 005 003 005 005 005 005 005
.---
Energy 4.4200е- 0.0402 0.0338 24000€- $ 3.0600€. 3.0600е- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 0,0000 224.6924 | 224.6924 00161 26500e- T 225.8859 003 004 003 003 003 003 003
Mobile 0.0968 1 0.1643 1.0761 2.7000€- 0.2987 | 2.15000. 0.3009 0.0798 20200е- 0.0818 0.0000 2499673 | 2499673 1 0.0120 0.0120 T 255.8281 003 003 003
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 75 9146 000000 75.9146 4,4864 0,0000 188.0751 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.9616 / 213.8125 | 242.7741 29927 0.0724 339.1736 Total 1.7257 0.2046 1.1195 2.9400e- 0.2987 5.2400e- 0.3040 0.0798 5.1100e- 0.0849 104.8761 688.4909 793.3670 7.5073 0.0870 1,006.982 003 003 003
ROG NOX co S02 Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week
Site Preparation •Site Preparation 11/1/2024 (11/8/2024 --+-
: Grading Grading 111912024 112512024 191
: infrastructure improvements ¡Grading : 12/6/2024 : 1/1/2025 19; CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied :Building Construction :Building Construction :1/2/2025 :9/25/2025 191:
-+
:Paving ¿Paving 9/26/2025 :10/14/2025 13!
:Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating : 10/15/2025 : 10/31/2025 13:

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 64.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 258
Acres of Paving: 3.19
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 597,378; Non-Residential Outdoor: 199,126; Striped Parking Area:
22,504 (Architectural Coating - sqft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 8.00 247• 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 8 00 0.37
Grading Excavators 8.00 158' 0.38
.. ..-
Grading *Graders
+
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 8.00 0.40
Grading Scrapers N 8.00 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes N 8.00
Infrastructure Improvements Excavators 8.00
Infrastructure Improvements Trenchers 8.00
Building Construction ¡Cranes 7.00
Building Construction Forklifts
Building Construction Generator Sets 8.00
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes"
Building Construction Welders 00 0.45
Paving 8
¡Pavers
Paving Paving Equipment 8
Paving :Rollers
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Architectural Coating : Air Compressors - 6.00฿ 78% 0.48 Infrastructure Improvements ¿Graders 8.00đ 187+ 0.41
Infrastructure Improvements *Rubber Tired Dozers 8.00 247: 0.40 Infrastructure Improvements Scrapers 8.00 367: 0.48
Infrastructure Improvements Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes N 8,00: 97: 0.37 Trips and VMI
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Site Preparation 18.00 0.00! 0.00. 14.701 6.90! 20.00;LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 0.00 2.92| 14.704 6.90; 20.00;LD Mix
Infrastructure 13! 5.00฿ 0.001 0.00 l 14.70
Building Construction 166.00• 65.00 14.701 20.00;LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 15.00 0.00% 0.00i 14.701 6.90! 20.00; LD Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating - 33.00 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00 LD_Mix •HDT_Mix :HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Fugitive Dust 0.0884 | 0.0000 0.0884 0.0335 0,0000 0.0335 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 - ----
"Of-Road 7.9800е- 0.0815 0.0550 1.1000€- 3,6900e- 3,6900e- 3.3900e- 3.3900е- 0.0000 100371$ 10.0371 3.2500e- 000000* 10.1183 003 004 003 003 003 003 003
Total 7.9800e- 0.0815 0.0550 1.1000e- 0.0884 3.6900e- 0.0921 0.0335 3.3900e- 0.0369 0.0000 10.0371 10.0371 3.2500e- 0.0000 10.1183 003 004 003 003 003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -----
Vendor 0.00000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 •-- 1.2000e- 1.5800e- 5.9000€- 000000 6.0000e- 1.6000e 16000-. 0.0000 0.4371 0.4371 1.0000e- 0.4406 Worker - 1.6000e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e-
004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 005
Total 1.6000e- 1.2000e- 1.5800e- 0.0000 5.9000e- 0.0000 6.0000e- 1.6000e- 0.0000 1.6000e- 0.0000 0.4371 0.4371 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.4406 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX co SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Fugitive Dust 0.0884 :0.0000 0.0884 0.0335 0.0000 0.0335 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 'Off-Road" 0.0815 5.0550 1.1000€- 3.6900e- 3.6900€- 3.3900e- 3.3900e- 0,0000 -10.0371 1 10.0371 13.2500e- 0.0000 10.1183 003 004 003 003 003
Total 7.9800e- 0.0815 0.0550 1.1000e- 0.0884 3.6900e- 0.0921 0.0335 3.3900e- 0.0369 0.0000 10.0371 10.0371 3.2500e- 0.0000 10.1183 003 004 003 003 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 1.2000e- 158000- 00000* 5.9000e- 0.0000 6.0000€- 1.6000€- 0.0000 1.6000€- 0.4371 0.4371 1.0000e- 10000- 04406 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005
Total 1.6000e- 1.2000e- 1.5800e- 0.0000 5.9000e- 0.0000 6.0000e- 1.6000e- 0.0000 1.6000e- 0.0000 0.4371 0.4371 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.4406 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Fugitive Dust 0.1940 0.0000 0.1940 0.0462 0.0000 0.0462 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 00000 0.0000 0,0000 Off-Road - 1 00306 0.3076 02634 5.90000. 0.0127 0.0127 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 51.7936 51.7936 0.0168 0.000 522123 004
Total 0.0306 0.3076 0.2634 5.9000e- 0.1940 0.0127 0.2067 0.0462 0.0117 0.0579 0.0000 51.7936 51.7936 0.0168 0.0000 52.2123 004
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling 0.0000 1.6000e- 4.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.0786 0.0786 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0823 004 005 005 005 005 005 005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 000000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e- 4.1000e- 5.5600e- 2.0000e- 2.0900e- 1.0000e. 2.1000e- 5.5000€- 1.0000e- 5.60000- 15378 1.5378 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 15504 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 005 004 005 005
Total 5.8000e- 5.7000e- 5.6000e- 2.0000e- 2.1200e- 1.0000e- 2.1300e- 5.6000e- 1.0000e- 5.7000e- 0.0000 1.6164 1.6164 4.0000e- 5.0000e- 1.6327 004 003 005 003 005 003 005 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Fugitive Dust 0.1940 0.0000 0.1940 0.0462 0.0000 0.0462 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.3076 0.2634 5.9000e- 0.0127 0.0127 0.0117 00117 0.0000* -51.7935 1 | 61,7935 5.0000 6222123 004

0.0306 0.3076 0.2634 5.9000e- 0.1940 0.0127 0.2067 0.0462 0.0117 0.0579 0.0000 51.7935 51.7935 0.0168 0.0000 52.2123 004
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- Co2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling 0.0000 1.6000e- 4.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.0786 0.0786 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0823 004 005 005 005 005 005 005
Vendor ----. 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker 5000e 4.1000e- 5.5600€- 200000- 1.0000e- 2.1000e- 5.5000e- 1.0000e. 5.6000€- 0.0000 1.5378 1.5378 4.0000€. :4.0000e- 1.5504 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 005
Total 5.8000e- 5.7000e- 5.6000c- 2.0000e- 2.1200e- 1.0000e- 2.1300e- 5.6000e- 1.0000e- 5.7000e- 0.0000 1.6164 1.6164 4.0000e- 5.0000e- 1.6327 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0844 1 0.0000 0.0844 0.0331 0.0000 0.0331 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 04741 0.4065 9,9000e- 00195 0.0198 0.0183 0.0183 000000 36.7493 86.7493 0.0281 0.0000 1 87.4507 004
Total 0.0469 0.4741 0.4065 9.9000e- 0.0844 0.0198 0.1043 0.0331 0.0183 0.0513 0.0000 86.7493 86.7493 0.0281 0.0000 87.4507 004
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e
Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 00000* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 Worker 1.4000e- 1.0000e- 1.3200е- 00000* 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.0000đ- 1.3000e- 00000* 1.3000đ- 0,0000 0.3642 0.3642 1.0000€- 1.0000€ T 0.3672 004 004 003 004 004 004 005 005
Total 1.4000e- 1.0000e- 1.3200e- 0.0000 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.0000e- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.3642 0.3642 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.3672 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Fugitive Dust 0.0844 0.0000 0,0844 0.0331 0.0000 0.0331 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0469 0.4741 0.4065 0.0198 100198 0.0183 0.0183 0.0000 86.7491 86.7491 0.0281 00000* - 874506 004
Total 0.0469 0.4741 0.4065 9.9000e- 0.0844 0.0198 0.1043 0.0331 0.0183 0.0513 0.0000 86.7491 86.7491 0.0281 0.0000 87.4506 004
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 00000* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 Worker 1.4000e- 1.0000e- 1.3200е- 0.0000* 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.0000e- 1.3000e- 00000 1.3000€- 0,00000 0.3642 0.3642 -1.0000e- 1.0000€- 0.3672 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 005
Total 1.4000e- 1.0000e- 1.3200e- 0.0000 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.0000e- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.3642 0.3642 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.3672 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/yr
Fugitive Dust 0,0332 1 0.0000 0.0332 4.9200e- 0.0000 4.9200e- 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 003 003
•Off-Road : 24400e- 0.0240 0.0219 5.0000€- 5,8000€- 9,8000- 9.0000e- 90000€- 000000* - 4.8200 -4,8200 1,5600e- 0.0000 4.8589 003 005 004 004 004 004 003
Total 2.4400e- 0.0240 0.0219 5.0000e- 0.0332 9.8000e- 0.0342 4.9200e- 9.0000e- 5.8200e- 0.0000 4.8200 4.8200 1.5600e- 0.0000 4.8589 003 005 004 003 004 003 003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG Fugitive PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----- 00000 0.0000 00000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0-0000đ 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 00000* 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor
Worker 1.0000e- 0.0000 7.0000- 0.0000 3.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 0.0000 000197 005 005 005 005 005
Total 1.0000e- 0.0000 7.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 0.0000 0.0197 005 005 005 005 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 Co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Fugitive Dust 0.0332 0,0000 0,0332 4.9200e- 0.0000 4.9200e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003
Off-Road 2.4400€- 0.0240 0.0219 5.0000€- 9,8000€. 9,8000€- 9.0000e- 9.0000e 0.0000 4.8200 4.8200 1.5600e- 0.0000 4.8589 003 005 004 004 004 004 003
Total 2.4400e- 0.0240 0.0219 5.0000e- 0.0332 9.8000e- 0.0342 4.9200e- 9.0000e- 5.8200e- 0.0000 4.8200 4.8200 1.5600e- 0.0000 4.8589 003 005 004 003 004 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e- 0.0000 7.0000- 0.0000 3. 0000е- 0.0000 3.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- :0.0000 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 0,0000 0.0197 005 005 005 005 005
Total 1.0000e- 0.0000 7.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 0.0000 0.0197 005 005 005 005 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 | NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Off-Road 1,1909 1.5361 2,5700e 1 0.0504 0,0504 0,0474 0.0474 0.0000 T | |221.4831 0.0521 0.0000 | 222.7847 : 01000 003
Total 0.1306 1.1909 1.5361 2.5700e- 0.0504 0.0504 0.0474 0.0474 0.0000 221.4831 221.4831 0.0521 0.0000 222.7847 003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/Уг
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 | 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.5300e- 0.2111 0.0829 -1.0500e- 0.0392 1.7600e- 0.0410 0.0113 1.6800e- 0.0130 00000 101.0205 :101.0205 1.1300е- 0.0149 105.4844 003 003 003 003 003

0.0304 0.4321 1.3500e- 0.1742 7.5000€- 0,1750 0.0465 6.9000e- 0.0470 000000 123.9605 123.9605 1 2.7100e- 3.0500e- 124.9367 Worker 0.0449
003 004 003 003
Total 0.0514 0.2415 0.5150 2 4000e- 0.2135 2.5100e- 0.2160 0.0576 2.3700e- 0.0600 0.0000 224.9811 224.9811 3.8400e- 0.0179 230.4211 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr
Off-Road ฿ 0.1306 1,1909 1.5361 2570001 : 0.0504 0.0504 0.0474 0.0474 0.0000 221.4828 | 221.4828 0.0521 0,0000 T 222,7844 003
Total 0.1306 1.1909 1.5361 2.5700e- 0.0504 0.0504 0.0474 0.0474 0.0000 221.4828 221.4828 0.0521 0.0000 222.7844 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- C02 NBio C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2111 0.0829 1.0500e- 0.0392 1.7600e- 0.0410 0.0113 1.6800e- 0.0130 0.0000 101.0205 101.0205 1.1300е- 0.0149 105.4844 003 003 003 003 003
Worker 0.0449 0.0304 0.4321 1.3500е- 0.1742 7.5000€- 0,1750 0.0463 6.9000€- 0.0470 0.0000 123.9605 123.9605 | 2.7100e- 3.0500e- 124.9367 004 003 003
Total 00514 0.2415 0.5150 2.4000e- 0.2135 2.5100e- 0.2160 0.0576 2.3700e- 0.0600 0.0000 224.9811 | 224.9811 3.8400e- 0.0179 230.4211 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Paving - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Off-Road 0.0558 0.0948 1.5000e- 2.7200e- 1 2.7200e- 2.5000e. : 2.5000e- 0.0000 13.0125 13.0125 14.2100e. | 0,0000 13.1177 : 505000- 004 003 003 003 003
Paving 14,1800- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000* 000000 0.0000 003
Total 0.0101 0.0558 0.0948 1.5000e- 2.7200e- 2.7200e- 2.5000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 13.0125 13.0125 4.2100e- 0.0000 13.1177 004 003 003 003 003 003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
co2e
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e- 1.9000C- 2.6600e- 1.0000e- 1.0700е- 0.0000 1.0800e. 2.8000e- 0.0000 29000C- 0.0000 0.7624 0.7624 2.0000e- 0.7684 004 004 003 005 003 003 004 004 005
Total 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 2.6600e- 1.0000e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 2.9000€- 0.0000 0.7624 0.7624 2.0000e. 2.0000e- 0.7684 004 004 003 003 003 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Paving - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Off-Road : 5,9500e- 0,0558 0.0948 1,5000e- :2.7200e- i 2.7200e- 2.5000e- : 2.5000e- 0.0000 13.0125 13.0125 4.2100e- 0.0000 13.1177 003 004 003 003 003 003 003
Paving :41800e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003
Total 0.0101 0.0558 0.0948 1.5000e- 2.7200e- 2.7200e- 2.5000e- 2.5000e- 0.0000 13.0125 13.0125 4.2100e- 0.0000 13.1177 004 003 003 003 003 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 :0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----- 0.0000 0000"
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000* 0.0000 0.0000 000000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----- 29000e- 0.7684
Worker 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 26600e- 1.0000e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 1.0800e- 2.8000€- 0.0000 0.7624 0.7624 2.0000e- 2.0000e- 004 004 003 005 003 003 004 005 005
Total 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 2.6600e- 1.0000e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 0.0000 2.9000e- 0.0000 0.7624 0.7624 2.0000e- 2.0000e- 0.7684 004 004 003 005 003 003 004 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr мт/уг
Archit. Coating 1.8981 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 ----.
• Road 111100e. - 74500e. 0.0118 2.0000e- 3.3000e- 3.3000e- 3.3000е- 3,3000€ 0.0000 1.6596 1.6596 9.0000€- 1 0.0000 1.6619 003 003 005 004 004 004 005
Total 1.8992 7.4500e- 0.0118 2.0000e 3.3000e- 3.3000e- 3.3000e- 3.3000e- 0.0000 1.6596 1.6596 9.0000e- 0.0000 1.6619 003 005 004 004 004 004 005
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 Co2e PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 000000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 00000 Worker 6.1000e- 4.1000e- 5.8500е- 2.0000€- : 2.3600e- 1.0000e- 2.3700e- 6.3000€- 1.0000C- 640000- 0.0000 1.6773 1.6773 4.0000e- | 4.0000e- 16905 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 005
Total 6.1000e- 4.1000e- 5.8500e- 2.0000e- 2.3600e- 1.0000e- 2.3700e- 6.3000e- 1.0000e- 6.4000e- 0.0000 1.6773 1.6773 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 1.6905 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- C02 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Archit. Coating 1.8981 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 Off-Road 1,1700e -7.4500€- 0.0118 2.0000e. 33000e- 3.3000C- 3.3000e- 3.3000e- 0.0000 1.6596 1.6596 9.0000€- 0.0000 1.6619 003 003 005 004 004 004 004
Total 1.8992 7.4500e- 0.0118 2.0000e- 3.3000e- 3.3000e- 3.3000e- 3.3000e- 0.0000 1.6596 1.6596 9.0000e- 0.0000 1.6619 003 005 004 004 004 004 005
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 COze PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 Worker 6.1000e- 4.1000e- 5,8500e- 2.0000e- 2.3600e- 1.0000e. 2.3700€- 6.3000€- 1.000e 6.4000€- 0.0000 1.6773 1.6773 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 1.6905 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 005 005
Total 6.1000e- 4.1000e- 5.8500e- 2.0000e- 2.3600e- 1.0000e- 2.3700e- 6.3000e- 1.0000e- 6.4000e- 0.0000 1.6773 1.6773 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 1.6905 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

1.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

1.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOX Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.6 Bio- CO2 INBio- Co2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Mitigated 0,0968 0.1643 1.0761 2.7000e- 0.2987 2.1500e- 0.3009 0.0798 2.0200e- 0.0818 0.0000 I 249.9673 | 249.9673 0.0120 0.0120 253.8281 003 003 003
Unmitigated 0.0968 0.1643 1.0761 2.7000e- 0.2987 2.1500e- 0.3009 0,0798 2.0200e- 0.0818 0.0000 003 003 003

1.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Office Building. 0.00 0.00 0.00
- ...- .. --.

Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 184.32 184.32 184.32 789,943 789,943 Total 184.32 184.32 184.32 789,943 789,943

1.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose%
Land Use H-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWH-W or C-WH-S or C-cH-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 arking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
• ... 41.00
Ünrefrigerated Warehouse No 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

1.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.540541 0.056458: 0.173793: 0.136090: 0.025268: 0.007074; 0.011525 0.018705: 0.000610: 0.000304: 0.023606, 0.001094, 0.004932 Parking Lot 0.540541 0.056458 0.173793: 0.1360901 0.025268: 0.007074 0.011525 0.018705 0.0006107 0.0003041 0.0236061 0.001094 0.004932 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 0.540541: 0.056458 0.173793: 0.136090; 0.025268: 0.007074: 0.011525 0.018705 0.0006102 0.0003047 00023606% 0.001094: 0.004932

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- C02 NBio- Co2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr мт/уг
• 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 180.9146180.9146 0.0153 1.8500e- 1 181.8479 Electricity 003
Mitigated
Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 180.9146 | 180.9146 1 0.0155 1.8500e- T 181.8479 Unmitigated i 003

4.4200e- 0.0402 0.0338 2.4000e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 0.0000 43.7779 43.7779 50000- 8.0000e- 44.0380 004 003 003 003 003 004
- --
NaturalGas 4.4200e- 0.0402 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 0.0000 43.7779 44.0380

0.0338 2.4000e- 437779 .000 000
Unmitigated 003 004 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa ROG NOX co Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Land Use tons/yr МТ/уг
General Office 48020 2.6000e- 2.3500e- 1.9800e- 1.0000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.0000 2.5625 2.5625 5.0000e- 5.0000e- 2,5778 Building 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005
*Parking Lot 50000" 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000* 0.0000 0.0000 00000* 000000 00000* 000000 000000 0.0000 Unrefrigerated 772347 4.1600e-1 0.0379 0.0318 2.3000e- 2.8800e- 2.8800e- 2.8800e- 2.8800e- 7 9000е- 7.6000 1 41.4603 Warehouse-No 003 004 003 003 003 004
Rail
Total 4.4200e- 0.0402 0.0338 2.4000e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 0.0000 43.7779 43.7779 8.4000e- 8.1000e- 44.0380 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Office 48020 2,6000e- : 2.3500e- 1.9800e- 1.0000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 1.8000e- 0.0000 2.5625 2.5625 5.0000e- 5.0000e- 2.5778 Building 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005
----. 0,0000 0.0000 00000
"Parking Lot 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 5.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.000 Unrefrigerated 772347 4.1600€- 0.0379 0.0318 2.3000e- 2,8800e- 2.8800e- 2.8800e- 2.8800e- 0.0000 41215a 41.2154 -+1,9000e- 7.60000- 41.4603 Warehouse-No 004 003 003 003 003 004 004
Total 4.4200e- 0.0402 0.0338 2.4000e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 3.0600e- 0.0000 43.7779 43.7779 8.4000e- 8.1000e- 44.0380 004 003 003 003 003 004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Use
Land Use kWh/yr МТ/уг
General Office 128660: 22.8173 1.9300e- | 2.3000e- 22.9350 Building 003 004
"Parking Lot - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000*
Warehouse. Ne 891465 0.0133 1.6200e- 158.9129
003
Total 180.9146 0.0153 1.8500e- 181.8479
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Mitigated
Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e
Use
Land Use kWh/yr МТ/уг
General Office 128660* 22,8173 1.9300e- , 2.3000e- 22.9350 Building 003 004
Parking Lot 0.0000 0.0000 00000* 00000
Unrefrigerated 0.0135 1.62000-1 158.9129
Warehouse-No 003
Rail
Total 180.9146 0.0153 1.8500e- 181.8479
003

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied NOx Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 N20 coze PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5
Category tons/yr МТ/уг
Mitigated 1.6246 9.0000e-9,5700e- 0.0000 3.0000e-3.0000e- 0.0187 5.0000e- 0.0000 0,0199 005 003 005 005
Unmitigated 1.6246 9.0000e- 9.5700e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 5.0000- 0.0000 0.0199 005 003 005 005

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
SubCategory tons/yr МТ/уг
Architectural : 0.1846 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
Consumer 1.4391 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products
Landscaping 8.8000e- 9.0000e- 9.5700e- 000000 3.00000- 300000. 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 00187 000187 5.0000e- 0.0000 000199 004 005 003 005 005 005 005
Total 1.6246 9.0000e- 9.5700e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.0187 0.0187 5.0000e- 0.0000 0.0199 005 003 005 005 005 005 005
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
SubCategory tons/yr мт/уг
Architectural 0.1846 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
Consumer 1.4391 0000 0000 0,0000 0.0000 00000 -0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products
Landscaping 9.0000e- 9.5700e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 0.0187 | 0.0187 500096* 0.0000 0.0199 005 005
Total 1.6246 9.0000e- 9.5700e- 0.0000 3.0000e- 3.0000e- 3.000- 3.000- 0.0000 0.0187 0.0187 5.0000e- 0.0000 0.0199 005 003 005 005 900

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e
Category МТ/уг
Mitigated • 242.7741 H 2.9927 0.0724 (339.1736
Unmitigated : 242.7741 2.0927 0.0724 339,1736

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e
door Use
Land Use Mgal
General Office 1152807 3 9,5402 0,0818 2.0000e- 12.1829 Building 003
Parking Lot 010 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000
Unrefrigerated 88.8 / 233.2338 2.9109 0.0704 326.9907
Warehouse-No 10.001669
Rail
Total 242.7741 2.9927 0.0724 339.1736
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze
door Use
Land Use Mgal МТ/уг
General Office (2.48827 1 1 9.5402 0.0818 2.0000e- 12.1829 Building 1.52507 003
T
Parking Lot -0.0000 0.0000 0.0000* 00000
Unrefrigerated 10.00160 23323387 8887 29109 0.0704 326.9907 Warehouse-No
Total 242.7741 2.9927 0.0724 339.1736

3.0 Waste Detail

3.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N20 Coze
МТ/уг
Mitigated 75.9146 4.4864 0.0000 188.0751
-Unmitigated 75.9146 4.4864 0.0000 188.0751

3.2 Waste by Land Use
Inmitigated
Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze
Disposed
Land Use МТ/уг
General Office 13.02 $ 2.6429 0.1562 0.0000 6.5478
Building
• -
Parking Lot 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated 360,96 73,2716 4.3302 0.0000 181.5273
Warehouse-No
Rail
Total 75.9146 4.4864 0.0000 188.0751
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Waste by Land Use
Vitigated
Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Disposed
Land Use tons МТ/уг
General Office 13.02 2.6429 70,1562 0.0000 6,5478
Building
"Parking Lot 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000"
Warehouse. N 360.96 732716 4.3302 0.0000 181.5273
Total 75.9146 4.4864 0.0000 188.0751
).0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 35 Date: 7/15/2024 12:48 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Northern Gateway Logistics Center
Riverside-South Coast County, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 14.00 1000sgft 0.32 14,000.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1000sqft 11.20 384,252.00 Parking Lot 354.00 Space 3.19 0.00

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Land Use - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Construction Phase - See comment on: "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths".

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Trips and VMT - Consistent with DEIR"s model.

Grading - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Architectural Coating - Consistent with DEIR"s model.

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Vehicle Trips - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Energy Use - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Water And Wastewater - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tbArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Parking 0.00 22,504.00 tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 6.00
tbConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 19.00
tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 19.00
tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 191.00
tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00
tb|ConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
biConstructionPhase PhaseEnDate 11/14/2024 11/8/2024
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/26/2024 12/5/2024
biConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/6/2025 1/1/2025
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/2/2026 9125/2025
bIConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/30/2026 10/14/2025
tbConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/28/2026 10/31/2025
tbiConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/15/2024 1119/2024 tbiConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/27/2024 1216/2024 -------
tbIConstructionPhase 217/2025 112i2025
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseStarDate 4/3/2026 9/26/2025
... ...
tbIConstructionhase 5/1/2026 10/15/2025
tbiGrading AcresOfGrading 57.00 258.00
tbiGrading AcresOGrading 9.00 64.50
tbiGrading MaterialExported 0.00 1.519.00
tbiLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 384.000.00 384,252.00
tbiLandUse i LandUseSquareFeet 141,600.00 0.00
tbIL andUse LotAcreage 8.82 11.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied blOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 84.00
blOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 78.00 367.00
blOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 4.00 tbiTripsAndVMT Hauling TripNumber 150.00 2.92
tbITripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 33.00 5.00
tbiVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 0.48
tbiVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.48
tblVehicle Trips WD_TR 9.74 0.00
ibivehicle Trips WD TR 1.74 0.48
ibiwater .... 0.00 1,669.00*•••.....

2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 | Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Year Ib/day Ib/day
2024 5.2243 52,6897 45.3338 0.1102 29,6678 2,2039 30.8981 11.2150 2.0276 12.3468 0.0000 10,673.06 | 10,673.06 3.4374 5.8000e- 10,759.32 003 83
2025 : 2922836 147.9282 1 43.9872 0.1102 9.2595 1.9671 112266 3.6686 1,8097 5.4783 000000 10.672.68110,672.68 3.4377 0.2053 T 10,758.92 72 Maximum 292.2836 52.6897 45.3338 0.1102 29.6678 2.2039 30.8981 11.2150 2.0276 12.3468 0.0000 10,673.0610,673.06 3.4377 0.2053 10,759.32 93 83
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Year Ib/day Ib/day

10.673.06 10,673.06 3.4374 5.8000e-
: 2822836 47.9282 : 43.9872 1 1006726811067268134377 710.758.922 Maximum 292.2836 52.6897 45.3338 0.1102 29.6678 2.2039 30.8981 11.2150 2.0276 12.3468 0.0000 10,673.06 10,673.06 3.4377 0.2053 10,759.32 93 83
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx co S02 Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO20 PM10 PM25 PM2.5 Total
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- Co2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Area 8.9039 6.9000e- 0.0766 1.0000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 0.1646 0.1646 4.3000e- 0,1753 004 005 004 004 004 004 004
Energy - 0.0242 0.2204 0.1851 1.3200e- 00168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 264.4211 | 2644211 5.0700e- 4.8500e- 1 265.9924 003 003 003

0.6083 0,8447 6.5138 0.0158 1.6688 0.0118 1.6806 0.4452 0.0111 0.4563 1000180830 0.0717 0.0705 11027,708 Total 9.5364 1.0657 6.7755 0.0171 1.6688 0.0288 1.6977 0.4452 0.0281 0.4733 1,869.485 1,369.485 0.0772 0.0754 1,893,876 Mitigated Operational
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 c02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Area 8.9039 6.9000e- 0.0766 27000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 0.1646 0.1646 4.3000e- 0.1753 004 10050- 004 004 004 004 004
Energy 0.0242 0.2204 0.1851 1200- 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 264.4211 1 264.4211 5.0700e- 4.8500e- 265.9924 003
Mobile 0.6083 0.8447 6.5138 0.0158 1.6688 0.0118 1.6806 0.4452 0.0111 0.4563 Total 9.5364 1.0657 6.7755 0.0171 1.6688 0.0288 1.6977 0.4452 0.0281 0.4733 1,869.485 1,869.485 0.0772 0.0754 1,893.876 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week
•Site Preparation •Site Preparation 11/1/2024 11/8/2024 (Grading" ¡Grading 11/9/2024 12/5/2024
• Infrastructure Improvements Grading 1216/2024 1177/2025 Building Construction Building Construction 1/2/2025 9/25/2025 191! Paving *Paving 9/26/2025 10/14/2025 131
: Architectural Coating : Architectural Coating 10/15/2025 10/31/2025 13• Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 64.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 258
Acres of Paving: 3.19
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 597,378; Non-Residential Outdoor: 199,126; Striped Parking Area:
22,504 (Architectural Coating - sqft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation ! Rubber Tired Dozers 8.00% 247• 0.40
Site Preparation :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 8.00฿ 97! 50.37 Grading ¡Excavators 8.00฿ 158 0.38
Grading ¡Graders 8.001 187. 0.41
Grading : Rubber Tired Dozers 247: 0.40

8.00:

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Grading • Scrapers 8.00: 367: 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 8.00+ 97 0,37
Infrastructure Improvements Excavators 8.00 0.38
Infrastructure Improvements {Trenchers 8.00 367: 0.50
Building Construction *Cranes 7.00 231: 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 8.00 89: 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 8.00 84! 0.740
+
Building Construction {Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 8.00 130; 0.42
...-
Paving *Paving Equipment 8.00 132 0.36
Paving ¡Rollers 8.00 80• 0.38

6.001 +
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 78! 0.48

8.00% 0.41
Infrastructure Improvements •Graders 187•
....- ..... --→
Infrastructure Improvements *Rubber Tired Dozers 8.00 247• 0.40 Infrastructure Improvements •Scrapers 8.00% 367: 0480
. . . . ----------------
Infrastructure Improvements Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes N 8.00: 97: 0.37 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Site Preparation 18.00• 0.00, 14.70! 6.901 20.00; LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ----
Grading 20.00• 2.00g 2.921 14.701 6.90 20.00 LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT - - - -
Infrastructure 5.00• 0.001 0.00, 14.701 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT Mix HHOT Imnrovements.. - - -
- -1
Building Construction 166.00 65.00L 0.001 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HOT_Mix Paving 15.00• 0.00! 0.00, 14.701 6.90 20.00: LD_Mix HDT_Mix --t 470₺
Architectural Coating 33.00: 0.00: 0.00: 6.90: 20.00 LD_Mix HDT _MiX

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 29.4666 0.0000 29.4666 11.1617 0.0000 11.1617 0.0000 0.0000 off-Road 2.6609 27,1760 18,3356 0.0381 1.2294 1.2294 1.1310 1,1310 73.668.010 | 3.688.010 1.1928 13,717.829 Total 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 29.4666 1.2294 30.6960 11.1617 1.1310 12.2927 3,688.0103,688.010 1.1928 3,717,829 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 cO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0:0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 Worker 0.0613 0.0362 0.6156 1.7100e- 0.2012 1 9.0000e. 0.2021 0.0534 8.3000e- 0.0542 173.1792 173.1792 | 3.75000- 3.9200e- 174.4420 003 004 003
Total 0.0613 0.0362 0.6156 1.7100e- 0.2012 9.0000e- 0.2021 0.0534 8.3000e- 0.0542 173.1792 173.1792 3.7500e- 3.9200e- 174.4420 003 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 29.4666 0,0000 29.4666 11.1617 0.0000 11.1617 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2,6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 1.2294 1.2294 1.1310 7.1310 0.000 3.688.010 1 3,688.010 | 1. 1.1928 3,717,829 Total 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 29.4666 1.2294 30.6960 11.1617 1.1310 12.2927 0.0000 3,688.010 3,688.010 1.1928 3,717.829 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5
Category ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 --
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0613 0.0362 0.6156 1.7100e- 0.2012 1 9.0000e- 0.2021 0.0534 8.3000e. 0.0542 173.1792 173.1792 3.7500e- 3.9200€- 174.4420 003 004 004 003 003
Total 0.0613 0.0362 0.6156 1.7100e- 0.2012 9.0000e- 0.2021 0.0534 8.3000e- 0.0542 173.1792 173.1792 3.7500e- 3.9200e- 174.4420 003 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 20.42260,0000 20.4226 4.8651 0.0000 4.8651 0.0000 0.0000 • Road 1-32181 32,3770 27.7228 0.0621" 1,3354 1,3354 12286 12286 1 6,058.340 Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 20.4226 1.3354 21.7580 4.8651 1.2286 6.0937 6,009.748 6.009,748 1.9437 6,058.340 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CoZe PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling * 3.4000e- 0.0158 4.3800e- , 9.0000e- | 2.7100e- 1.9000e- 2.9000e- 7.4000e- 1.8000e- ! 9.2000e- 9.1138 9.1138 1.4000e- 1.4400e- 9.5454 004 003 005 004 003 004 004 004 004 003
--- -
Vendor 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10000010000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0000.

Worker 0.0687 0.0402 0.6840 1.9000e- 0.2236 0.2246 0.0593 9.2000e- 0.0602 19242141 192.42141 4.1600e- 4.3600e- 193.8244 003 003 004 003 003
Total 0.0684 0.0560 0.6884 1.9900e- 0.2263 1.1900e- 0.2275 0.0600 1.1000e- 0.0611 201.5352 201.5352 4.3000e- 5.8000e- 203.3698 003 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 204226|0,0000 20.4226 4.8651 0,0000 4.8651 0.0000 0.0000 ••OFFRoad 1 32181 32,3770 27.7228 0.0621 1,3354 1.3354 22100 00 74 10 76 13437 12286 12286 6,058.340

3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 20.4226 1.3354 21.7580 4.8651 1.2286 6.0937 0.0000 6,009.748 6,009,748 1.9437 6.058.340 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling : 34000e. 0.0158 4.3800e- 9.0000e- 2.7100e- 1.9000e- | 2.9000e- 7.4000e- 1.8000e- 9.2000e- 9.1138 9.1138 1.4000e- 1.4400e- 9.5454 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 003
------ - ..

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000đ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0681 0.0402 0.6840 1.9000e- 0.2236 1.0000e- 0.2246 0.0593 5.2000€- 0.0602 1924214 | 19242141 4.1600e- 4.3600e. 1 193.8244 003 003 003
Total 0.0684 0.0560 0.6884 1.9900e- 0.2263 1.1900e- 0.2275 0.0600 1.1000e- 0.0611 201.5352 201.5352 4.3000e- 5.8000e- 203.3698 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 1 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off Road 1 5 5.2073 52,6796 45,1628 0-1098 2.2037 2.2037 2.0274 2.0274 10,624.96 1 10,624.96} 3.4363 10,710.87 22 Total 5.2073 52.6796 45.1628 0.1098 9.2036 2.2037 11.4073 3.6538 2.0274 5.6811 10.62.96 10624.96 3.4363 10,710.87 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0170 0.0101 0.1710° 4.8000e- 0.0559 2.5000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.3000€- 0.0151 48.1053 48-1053 11.0400€- 1.0900e 1 48.4561 004 004 004 003 003
Total 0.0170 0.0101 0.1710 4.8000e- 0.0559 2.5000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.3000e- 0.0151 48.1053 48.1053 1.0400e- 1.0900e- 48.4561 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 - 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0,0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000

52.6796 45.1628 0.1098 2.2037 2.2037 2.0274 2.0274 00000 10.624.96 | 10,624.961 3.4363 10,710.37 Total 5.2073 52.6796 45.1628 0.1098 9.2036 2.2037 11.4073 3.6538 2.0274 5.6811 0.0000 10,624.96 10,624.96 3.4363 10,710.87 40 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 N20 CO2e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 · 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0170 0.0101 0.1710 14.8000e- 0.0559 2.5000€. 0.0561 0.0148 2.3000€- 0.0151 48-1053 48.1053 1.0400e- 1.0900e- 48.4561 004 004 004 003 003
Total 0.0170 0.0101 0.1710 4.8000e- 0.0559 2.5000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.3000e- 0.0151 48.1053 48.1053 1.0400e- 1.0900e- 48.4561 004 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1-48733 47.9192 -43,8281 0.1098 1.9669 1.9669 1.8095 108095 10,626.21 110,626.21 3,4367 10,712.13 74 74 58
Total 4.8733 47.9192 43.8281 0.1098 9.2036 1.9669 11.1705 3.6538 1.8095 5.4633 10,626.21 10,626.21 3.4367 10,712.13 74 74 58
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 PM2.5
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 Worker 00159 9.0100e- 0.1590 4.6000e- 0.0559 1 24000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.2000€- 0.0150 46.4649 46.4649 9.4000e- 1.0200e. 46.7914 003 004 004 004 004 003
Total 0.0159 9.0100e- 0.1590 4.6000e- 0.0559 2.4000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.2000e- 0.0150 46.4649 46.4649 9.4000e- 1.0200e- 46.7914 003 004 004 004 004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- C02 NBio- CO2 | Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 : 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0,0000 0.0000 *Of-Road 4.8735 47.9192 | 43.8281 - 0.1098 1.9669 1.9669 1.8095 1.8095 000000 10,626.21 | 10,626.21 3.4367 10,712.13 Total 4.8733 47.9192 43.8281 0.1098 9.2036 1.9669 11.1705 3.6538 1.8095 5.4633 0.0000 10,626.21 10,626.21 3.4367 10,712.13 74 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Bio-CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000* 00000 Worker 0.0159 9.0100e- 0.1590 4.6000e- 0.0559 24000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.2000€- 0.0150 46.4649 46.4649 9.4000e. 1.0200e- 46.7914 003 004 004 003
Total 0.0159 9.0100e- 0.1590 4.6000e- 0.0559 2.4000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.2000e- 0.0150 46.4649 46.4649 9.4000e- 1.0200e. 46.7914 003 004 004 004 004 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Off-Road 1.3674 12,4697 16.0847 0.02701 : 0,5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 | 2,556.474! 0.6010 (2,571.498 ...

Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 2,556.474 T 0.6010 2,571.498 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG co2e
Category Ib/day 1b/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0712 2.1063 0.8546 0.0110 0.4163 0.0184 0.4347 0.1199 0.0176 0.1375 1.164800 1,164,300 0.0132 0.1715 1,216.243 Worker 0.5277 0.2990 5.2798 000155 1.8555 7.8500e- 1.8633 0.4921 7.2300e- 0.4993 1,542.634 1,542.634 0.0311 0.0338 1.553.474 Total 0.5989 2.4053 6.1344 0.0262 2.2718 0.0262 2.2980 0.6120 0.0248 0.6368 2.707.438 207455 0.0443 0.2053 2.769.717 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Off-Road : 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 | 0.0270 | 1 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0,0000 1 2,556.474 | 2,556.474 | 0.6010 2,571.498 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4742,556.474 0.6010 2,571.498 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
co2e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1063 0.8546 0.0110 0.4163 0.0184 0-4347 0.1199 0.0176 0.1375 0.0132 0.1715 1,216.243

0.0712 1.164.300 1164300
Worker 0.5277 0.2990 5,2798 0.0153 1.8555 7.8500e. 1.8633 0.4921 0.4993 1,542,634 1,542.634 0.0311 0.0338 1,553.474

7.2300e-
003
Total 0.5989 2.4053 6.1344 0.0262 2.2718 0.0262 2.2980 0.6120 0.0248 0.6368 2,707.435 2,707.435 0.0443 0.2053 2,769.717 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Paving - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14,5780 0.0228 0,4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 | 2,206.745 | 0.7137 2,224,587 00000 ---- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000*
Paving 1 06429 0,0000 000000
Total 1.5581 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2,206.745 0.7137 2,224.587 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CO2e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling --- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 Worker 0.0477 0.0270 0.4771 1.3800e- 0.1677 17.10000- 0.1684 0.0445 6.5000€- 0.0451 139.3947 7 139.3947 2.8100e- 3.0500e- 140.3742 003 004 004 003 003
Total 0.0477 0.0270 0.4771 1.3800e- 0.1677 7.1000e- 0.1684 0.0445 6.5000e- 0.0451 139.3947 139.3947 2.8100e- 3.0500e- 140.3742 003 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Paving - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Off-Road 0,9152 8,5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2206745 2.206,74 | 0.7137 1 2,224.587 Paving - 06425 0.0000* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000* 0000 Total 1.5581 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2,206.745 0.7137 2,224.587 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOX S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 Worker 0.0477 0.0270 0.4771 1.3800e- 0.1677 1-7.1000e- 0.1684 0.0445 6.5000C- 0.0451 2.8100e- 3.0500e- 140.3742 003 004 004 003 003
Total 0.0477 0.0270 0.4771 1.3800e- 0.1677 7.1000e- 0.1684 0.0445 6.5000e- 0.0451 139.3947 139 3947| 2.8100e- 3.0500e- 140.3742 003 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Archi. Coating : 282.0079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 "Of-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 1 2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 1281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 003
Total 292.1787 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.8319 003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM2.5 PM2.5
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1049 0.0594 1.0496 3.0300e- 0.3689 1.5600e- 0.3704 0.0978 1.4400€- 00090 306.6684 306.6684 6.1900e- 6.700 | 308.8233 003 003 003 003
Total 0.1049 0.0594 1.0496 3.0300e- 0.3689 1.5600e- 0.3704 0.0978 1.4400e- 0.0993 306.6684 306.6684 6.1900e- 6.7100e- 308.8233 003 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day ib/day
Archit, Coating : 292.0079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 Of Road 0,1709 1,1455 1,8091 2.9700e- 0.0515 10.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0,0000 1 281.4481 281.8319 003
Total 292.1787 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1049 0.0594 1.0496 3.0300€- 0.3689 1.5600e- 0.3704 0.0978 1.4400e 000995 306.6684 ฿ 306.6684 6.19000 | 6.71008- 308.8233 003 003
Total 0.1049 0.0594 1.0496 3.0300e- 0,3689 1.5600e- 0.3704 0.0978 1.4400e- 0.0993 306.6684 306.6684 6.1900e- 6.7100e- 308.8233 003 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

1.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

1.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOX S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.6 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Mitigated 0 6083 0.8447 6.5138 0.0158 1,6688 0.0118 1,6806 0,4452 0.0111 0.4563 1,604.899 | 1,604.899 0.0717 0.0705 1.627.708 Unmitigated 0.6083 0,8447 6.5138 0,0158 1.6688 0.0118 1.6806 0.4452 0,0111 0.4563 182708-

1.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Office Building. 0:00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot. 0.00 0.00 0.00.

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 184.32 184.32 184.32 789,943 789,943 Total 184.32 184.32 184.32 789,943 789,943

1.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose%
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NWH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-0 or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19

6.60 8.40 690 0.00 0.00 0.00
-..-
Unrefrigerated Warehouse No 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

1.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.540541A 0.056458; 0.173793: 0. 136090: 0.025268 0.007074; 0.011525: 0.018705 0.000610: 0.000304: 0.023606: 0.001094| 0.004932 *Parking Lot 0.540541 0.056458 0.173793: 0.136090: 0.025268: 0.007074: 0.011525; 0.018705; 0.000610: 0.000304: 0.023606: 0.001094| 0.004932 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 0.540541 0.056458: 0.173793: 0.136090; 0.025268: 0.007074: 0.011525 0.018705: 00000610 0.000304: 0.023606 0.001094• 0.004932 Rail

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOX S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 INBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
NaturalGas 0.0242 0.2204 0.1851 1.3200e- 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 264.4211 | 264.4211 5.0700e- 4.8500e- 1 265.9924 Mitigated 003 003 003
NaturalGas" 0.0242 : 0.2204 0.1851 1.3200e- - 99100 / 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 2844211: 2644211 50700e 4500e 265.9924 Unmitigated 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa ROG NOX cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day
General Office 131.562 1,4200e- 0,0129 0.0108 8.0000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 15,4778 15.4778 1 3.0000e- 2.8000e- 15.5698 Building 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004
... - .. -
--- 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000 0,0000* 00000 00000 -0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated 2116.02 0.0228 0.2075 0.1743 1.2400e- 0.0158 0.0158 0.0158 0.0158 248.9433 1 248.9435 1 4.7700e- 4.5600 = 1 2504226 Warehouse-No 003 003 003
Rail
Total 0.0242 0.2204 0.1851 1.3200e- 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 264.4211 264.4211 5.0700e- 4.8400e- 265.9924 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa ROG NOX cO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day
General Office 0,131562 * 1.4200e- 0.0129 0.0108 8.0000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 15,4778 15.4778 3.0000e- 2.8000e- 15,5698 Building 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004
----- - - •
*Parking Lot 0.0000 0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Warenorse. 211602 7 0.0228 0.2075 0.1743 1.2400e- 0.0158 0.0158 0.0158 0.0158 12489435 1 248.9435 14.7700€: 4. 5600e- 250.4226 003 003 003
Total 0.0242 0.2204 0.1851 1.3200e- 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 264.4211 264.4211 5.0700e- 4.8400e- 265.9924 003 003 003

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Co2e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Mitigated 8.9039 6,9000e- 0.0766 1.0000e- :2.7000e- 2.7000e- : 2.7000e- : 2.7000e- 0.1646 0.1646 4.3000e- 0.1753 004 005 004 004 004 004 004
"Unmitigated 8.9039 $ 6.9000e- 0.0766 1.0000e- 2.7000e- 0.1646 0.1646 4.3000e- 0.1753 : 2.70000. 2.7000e- 2.7000e-
004 005 004 004 004 004

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOX Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day
Architectural * 1.0115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
Corders 7.8854 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----
Landscaping 7.0500e-1 00766 1.0000e- 27000e- 27000e- 270006- 2.7000e. 0.1646 0.1646 01755 003 004 005 004 004 004 004
Total 8.9039 6.9000e- 0.0766 1.0000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 4.3000 0.1753 004 005 004 004 004 004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
SubCategory Ib/day ib/day
Architectural 1.0115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 Coatina
Consumer 7.8854 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 Products
Landscaping 7.0500e-16.9000- 0.0766 1.0000e- :2,7000e- 2,7000e 2.7000C- 2200* 0.1646 1 0.1646 14.3000e- 001753 003 004 005 004 004 004 004
Total 8.9039 6.9000e- 0.0766 1.0000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 0.1646 0.1646 4.300€- 0.1753 004 005 004 004 004

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:46 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.0 Waste Detail

3.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
).0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Northern Gateway Logistics Center
Riverside-South Coast County, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 14.00 1000sqft 0.32 14,000.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 384.00 1000sqft 11.20 384,252.00 Parking Lot 354.00 Space 3.19 0.00

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Land Use - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Construction Phase - See comment on: "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths".

Off-road Equipment - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Trips and VMT - Consistent with DEIR"s model.

Grading - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Architectural Coating - Consistent with DEIR's model.

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Vehicle Trips - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Energy Use - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Water And Wastewater - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tbiArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Parking 0.00 22,504.00 tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00
tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 19.00
tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 19.00
tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 191.00
tbiConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
bIConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
tbiConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/14/2024 11/8/2024
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/26/2024 12/5/2024
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/6/2025 11112025
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/2/2026 9/25/2025
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/30/2026 10/14/2025
tbiConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/28/2026
tbiConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 11/15/2024 1119/2024 bIConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/27/2024 1216/2024 tbIConstructionPhase PhaseSta Date 2/7/2025 1/2/2025
tb|ConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/3/2026 9/26/2025
tbIConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/1/2026 10/15/2025 tbiGrading AcresOGrading 57.00 258.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 9.00 64.50
tbiGrading MaterialExported 0.00 1,519.00
LandUseSquareFeet 384,000.00 384,252.00
tbiLandUse i LandUseSquareFeet 141,600.00 0.00
LotAcreage 8.82 11.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied tbOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 84.00
blOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 78.00 367.00
(blOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 4.00 tbiTripsAndVMT Hauling TripNumber 150.00 2.92
tbITripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 33.00 5.00
tblVehicle Trips ST_TR 2.21 0.00
tblVehicle Trips ST_TR 1.74 0.48
tbIVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70 0.00
tbIVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 0.48
tblVehicle Trips WD_TR 9.74 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 0.48
*biwater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1.669.00*****-

2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Year Ib/day Ib/day
2024 5.2233 52.6900 45.3017 0.1102 29.6678 2.2039 30.8981 11.2150 2.0276 12,3468 0.0000 10,668.56 | 10,668.56 | 3,4374 5,9000e- 10,754.82 003 68
2025 12022776 47.9286 43.9575 | 0.1102 9.2595 1.9671 11.2266 3.6686 1.8097 -5.4783 0.0000 10.668.35 | 10.668.35 | 3.4377 0.2066 710,754,59 Maximum 292.2776 52.6900 45.3017 0.1102 29.6678 2.2039 30.8981 11.2150 2.0276 12.3468 0.0000 10,668.56 10,668.56 3.4377 0.2066 10,754.82 03 03 68
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Year Ib/day Ib/day
2024 5.2233 52.6900 45.3017 0.1102 29.6678 2.2039 30.8981 11.2150 2.0276 12.3468 0.0000 10,668.56 | 10,668.56 | 3,4374 5.9000e- 10,754.82 003 68
2025 292.2776 47.9286 43.9575 1 0.1102 -92595 11.2266 3.6686 6.0000 10,668.33 | 10.668.33 1 3.4377 0.2066 10,754.59 Maximum 292.2776 52.6900 45.3017 0.1102 29.6678 2.2039 30.8981 11.2150 2.0276 12.3468 0.0000 10,668.56 10,668.56 3.4377 0.2066 10.754.82 03 68
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO S02 Exhaust Fugitive Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM2.5

0.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- co2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Area 8.9039 6.9000e- 0.0766 1.0000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 0.1646 0.1646 4.3000e- 0.1753 004
264.4217 + 264.4211 1 5.0700e- 4.8500e- 265.9924
003 003
1490.3221 1.490.3221 0.0727 0.0720 11.513,586
-
Total 9.4538 1.1178 5.9737 0.0160 1.6688 0.0289 1.6977 0.4452 0.0281 0.4733 1,754.907 1754.907 0.0782 0.0768 1,779.753 Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 c02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Area 8.9039 6.9000e- 0.0766 1 1.0000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e. : 2.7000e- 0.1646 0.1646 4.3000e- 0.1753 004 005 004 004 004 004
--.

Energy 0.0242 0.2204 0.1851 1.3200e- 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 264.4211 | 5.0700e- 265.9924 003
Mobile 0.5257 0.8967 5.7120 0.0146 0.0118 0.4452 0.0117 0.4565 1.45.322 1.490.322 1 0.0727 0.0720 T 1,513,586 Total 9.4538 1.1178 5.9737 0.0160 1.6688 0.0289 1.6977 0.4452 0.0281 0.4733 1,754.907 1,754.907 0.0782 0.0768 1,779.753 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-C02 NBio-CO2| Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week
- •Site Preparation Site Preparation 11/1/2024 11/8/2024 .... ---_-
I N Grading Grading 11/9/2024 1215/2024 19!
• Infrastructure Improvements (Grading 1216/2024* 17112025 19! Building Construction Building Construction 112/2025 9/25/2025 191! •Paving •Paving 9/26/2025 10/14/2025
: Architectural Coating : Architectural Coating : 10/15/2025 : 10/31/2025 13:

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 64.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 258
Acres of Paving: 3.19

12. Sod Architectura: aidential Outdoor: Outdoor: Non-Residential Indoor: Indoor: Non- Residential Outdoor: 199,126; Striped Parking Area:

OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation *Rubber Tired Dozers 8.00! 247! 0.40
Site Preparation i Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 8.00! 97: 0.37 Grading ¡Excavators 8.00 158: 0.38
Grading ¿Graders 0.41

3.00L
Grading : Rubber Tired Dozers 8.00: 0.40
247:

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Grading Scrapers 8.00 367• 0.48
Grading :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 8.00t 97: 0.37
Infrastructure Improvements Excavators 8.00 84: 0.38
Infrastructure Improvements {Trenchers 8.00 367: 0.50
Building Construction Cranes 7.00 231: 0.29
Building Construction ¡Forklifts 8.00 89! 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 8.00 84' 0.74
Building Construction :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 7.00 97: 0.37 Building Construction Welders 8.00 46: 0.45
Paving Pavers 8.00 130: 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 8.00 132: 0.36
Paving *Rollers 8.00 80₽ 0.38
Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 6.00 78! 0.48
•Graders 8.00 187. 0.41
nfrastructure Improvements
..... .........-.

Infrastructure Improvements * Rubber Tired Dozers 8.00 247: 0.40 ----
Infrastructure Improvements Scrapers N 8.00 367: 0.48
..................

Infrastructure Improvements :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 8.00: 97: 0.37 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Site Preparation 18.00: 0.00 0.001 14.70; 6.90! 20.00;LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT --+ HHOT
Grading 20.00• 0.00 2.92 14.701 6.90, LD Mix HOT_Mix
Infrastructure 5.00+ 0.00! 0.00, 14.701 6.90! 20.00 LD Mix HDT_Mix Imnrovaments.. 14.700* HHoT **
Building Construction 166.00 65.00 0.00 6.90! 20.00 LD Mix**** HDT_MiX

14.70 -- 20.00 LD Mix
Paving 15.00, 0.00 0.00. 6.90! HDT_Mix HHDT
:

Architectural Coating 33.00: 0.000 0.00• 14.70฿ HOT Mix :HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX CO2e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust : 29.4666 0.0000 29.4666 11.1617 0.0000 11.1617 0,0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 1.2294 1.2294 1.1310 11310 3688.010 3688.0101 1.1928 13717,820 Total 2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 29.4666 1.2294 30.6960 11.1617 1.1310 12.2927 3,688.0103,688.010 1.1928 3,717.829 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 000000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 000000 Worker 0.0576 0.0375 0.5001 1.5500e- 0.2012 9.0000€- 0.2021 0.0534 8.3000e- 0.0542 156.9468 | 156.9468 | 3.7400e- 158.2365 003 004 004 003
Total 0.0576 0.0375 0.5001 1.5500e- 0.2012 9.0000e- 0.2021 0.0534 8.3000c- 0.0542 156.9468 156.9468 3.7400e- 4.0100e- 158.2365 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 29.4666 10,0000 29.4666 11.1617 0.0000 11.1617 0.0000 0.0000 ------ 3,717,829
Off-Road" 2.6609 27.1760 18,3356 0.0381 12294 1.2294 1.1310 1,1310 0.0000 358801075.65.0101 1.1928

2.6609 27.1760 18.3356 0.0381 29.4666 1.2294 30.6960 11.1617 1.1310 12.2927 0.0000 3,688.0103,688.010 1.1928 3,717.829 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Co2e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ---
Vendor 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000* Worker 0.0576 0.0375 0.5001 1.5500e- 0.2012 9.0000e- 0.2021 0.0534 8.300c 0.0542 156.9468 | 156.9468 3.7400e- 4.0100e- 158.2365 003 004 004 003 003
Total 0.0576 0.0375 0.5001 1.5500e- 0.2012 9.0000e- 0.2021 0.0534 8.3000e- 0.0542 156.9468 156.9468 3.7400e. 4.0100e- | 158.2365 003 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 20.42260,0000 20.4226 4.8651 0.0000 4.8651 0,0000 0.0000 | 32181 -32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 1,3354 1,3354 12286 12286* 6.009.748 16.009.748 $ 1.9437 6,058,340 Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 20.4226 1.3354 21.7580 4.8651 1.2286 6.0937 6,009.748 6,009.748 1.9437 6,058.340 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
co2e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling • 3.2000e- 0.0168 4.4700e-1 9.0000e-2,7100e- - 1.9000e- 2.9000e- 7.4000e- 1.8000e- 9.3000e- 9.1281 9.1281 1.4000e- 1.4400e- 9.5603 004 003 005 003 004 004 004 004 004
-----

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000* 0,0000 000000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000* Vendor
Worker 0.0640 0.0417 0.5557 1.7300e- 0.2236 1.0000e- 0.2246 0.0593 9.2000€- 0.0602 4.1600e- 4.4600e- 175.8183 003 003 004 003 003
Total 0.0643 0.0584 0.5602 1.8200e- 0.2263 1.1900e- 0.2275 0.0600 1.1000e- 0.0611 183.5135183.5135 4.3000e- 5.9000e- 185.3786 003 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx cO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 cOZe PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 20.4226 0.0000 20.4226 4.8651 0.0000 4.8651 0.0000 0.0000

32.3770 27.1228 0.0621 1.3354 1.3354 1.2286 1.2286 0.0000 1600974816009748 13437 6,058.340 Total 3.2181 32.3770 27.7228 0.0621 20.4226 1.3354 21.7580 4.8651 1.2286 6.0937 0.0000 6,009.748 6,009.748 1.9437 6,058.340 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- cO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling : 32000€- 0.0168 4.4700e- | 9.0000€- | 2.7100e- 1.9000e- 2.9000e- 7.4000e- 1.8000e- :9.3000e- 9.1281 9.1281 1.4000e- 1.4400e- 9.5603 004 003 005 004 003 004 004 004 004 003
--- -----
Vendor 00000 0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0640 0.0417 0.5557 1.7300e- 0.2236 1.0000e- 0.2246 0.0593 9.2000€- 0.0602 174.3853 1 174.3853 1 4.1600e- 44600e- 175.8183 003 003 004 003 003
Total 0.0643 0.0584 0.5602 1.8200e- 0.2263 1.1900e- 0.2275 0.0600 1.1000e- 0.0611 183.5135 183.5135 4.3000e- 5.9000e- 185.3786 003 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 cO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day ib/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0,0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0,0000 •*OH-Road 5.2073 52.6796 45.1628 1 0.1098 2.2037 2.2037 20274 2,0274 10.624.96 | 10.624.96 | 3.4365 10.710.87 22 Total 5.2073 52.6796 45.1628 0.1098 9.2036 2.2037 11.4073 3.6538 2.0274 5.6811 10,624.96 10,624.96 3.4363 10,710.87 40 40
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NBio C2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 Worker 0.0160 0,0104 0,1389 4.3000e- 0.0559 2.5000€- 0.0561 0.0148 2.3000e- 0.0151 1. 1200e. T 43.9546 004 004 004 003 003
Total 0.0160 0.0104 0.1389 4.3000e- 0.0559 2.5000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.3000e- 0.0151 43.5963 43.5963 1.0400e- 1.1200e- 43.9546 004 004 004 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0,0000 9.2036 3,6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road" 5.2073 52.6796 45.1628 0.1098 2.2037 2.2037 20274 2.0274 0,0000 10.624.96 1 10.524.56 + 34365 10,710.87 40 40 22
Total 5.2073 52.6796 45.1628 0.1098 9.2036 2.2037 11.4073 3.6538 2.0274 5.6811 0.0000 10,624.96 10,624.96 3.4363 10,710.87 40 40
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG CO2e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -----
Vendor 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0160 0.0104 0.1389 4.3000e- 0.0559 2.5000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.3000e- 0.0151 43.5963 43.5963 1 1.0400€- 1.1200€- 43.9546 004 004 004 003 003
Total 0.0160 0.0104 0.1389 4.3000e- 0.0559 2.5000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.3000e- 0.0151 43.5963 43.5963 1.0400e- 1.1200e- 43.9546 004 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 | 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 •Off-Road 4.8733 47.9192 43.8281 0.1098 1.9669 1.9669 1.8095 1.8095 10,626.27 | 10.626.21 3.4367 10,712.13 74 58
Total 4.8733 47.9192 43.8281 0.1098 9.2036 1.9669 11.1705 3.6538 1.8095 5.4633 10.626.21 |10,626.21 3.4367 10,712.13 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-Co2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0150 93400€- 0.1294 4.2000e- 0.0559 1 2.4000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.2000€- 0.0150 42.1208 42.1208 9.4000e- 1.0400€- 42-4543 003 004 004 004 004 003
Total 0.0150 9.3400e- 0.1294 4.2000e- 0.0559 2.4000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.2000e- 0.0150 42.1208 42.1208 9.4000e- 1.0400e- 42.4543 003 004 004 004 004 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Infrastructure Improvements - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 cO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0,0000 9.2036 3,6538 0,0000 3,6538 0.0000 0.0000 -47.9192 -43,8281 0.1098 1.9669 1.9669 1.8095 1,8095 0.0000* 100626.21 | 10,626.21 3.4367 10,71213 74 58
Total 4.8733 47.9192 43.8281 0.1098 9.2036 1.9669 11.1705 3.6538 1.8095 5.4633 0.0000 10,626.21 10,626.21 3.4367 10,712.13 74 74 58
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling *=: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 Worker 0.0150 9.3400e- 0.1294 -4.2000e- 0.0559 1 2.4000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.2000e- 0.0150 42.1208 42.1208 9.4000€- 1.0400e- 424543 003 004 004 004 004 003
Total 0.0150 9.3400e- 0.1294 4.2000e- 0.0559 2.4000e- 0.0561 0.0148 2.2000e- 0.0150 42.1208 42.1208 9.4000e- 1.0400e- 42.4543 003 004 004 004 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Off-Road : 13674 12,4697 16,0847 | 0,0270 : 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 1 2,556.474 | 2,556.474 | 0.6010 | 2,571,498 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.474 2,556.474 0.6010 2,571.498 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
c02e
Category Ib/day ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.2340 0.8839 0.0110 0.4163 0.0185 0.4348 0.1199 0.0177 0.1375 0.0129 0.1721 1,219.333

0.0658 1.18728 1.167,720%
Worker 0.4975 0.3100° 4.2948 0.0138 1.8555 78500e- 1.8633 0.4921 7.2300e- 0.4993 1,398.411 | 1,398.417 0.0312 0.0345 409484 003 003
Total 0.5633 2,5440 5.1788 0.0248 2.2718 0.0263 2.2981 0.6120 0.0249 0.6368 2,566.140 2,566.140 0.0441 0.2066 2,628.817 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- Co2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 coze PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Off-Road 1,3674 12.4697 16.0847 • 0.0270 1 0.5276 / 0,5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 | 2,556.474 0.6010 1 2,571.498 Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.474 2,556.474 0.6010 2,571,498 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total No CO TR CO ON 120T
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling * 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 Vendor 0.0658 2.2340 0.8839 0.0110 0.4163 0.0185 0.4348 0.1199 0.0177 0.1375 1.67,728 .167.728 0.0129 0.1721 1,219.333 --.

Worker 0.4975 0.3100 4,2948 0.0138 1.8555 78500e- 1.8633 0.4921 7.2300e- 0.4993 1,398.411 1398417 0.0312 0.0345 409.484 003 003
Total 0.5633 2.5440 5.1788 0.0248 2.2718 0.0263 2.2981 0.6120 0.0249 0.6368 2,566.140 2,566.140 0.0441 0.2066 2,628.817 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Paving - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- C02 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 Co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 • 0.0228 0,4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 | 2,206.745 0.7137 2,224,587 .... .-.
..•Paving" 1 0.6429 0.000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.000
Total 1.5581 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2,206.745 0.7137 2,224.587 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
C02e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0450 0.0280 0.3881 1.2500e- 0.1677 7.1000e- 0.1684 0.0445 6.5000e- 0.0451 126.36251 126.3625 28200e- 3.1200e- T 127.3630 004 004 003 003
Total 0.0450 0.0280 0.3881 1.2500e- 0.1677 7.1000e- 0.1684 0.0445 6.5000e- 0.0451 126.3625 126.3625 2.8200e- 3.1200e- 127.3630 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Paving - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-Co2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category ib/day Ib/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 • 0.0228 1 0,4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0,0000 2.205745 2,205745 0.7137 2,224.587 *Paving" -1 06429 100000 00000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000° 0.0000 Total 1.5581 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2,206.745 0.7137 2,224.587 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category 1b/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0450 0.0280 0.3881 12500e- 0.1677 7.1000e- 0.1684 0.0445 6.5000e- 0.0451 126.3625 T126.3625 2.8200e- 3.1200e- 127.3630 003 004 004 003 003
Total 0.0450 0.0280 0.3881 1.2500e- 0.1677 7.1000e- 0.1684 0.0445 6.5000e- 0.0451 126.3625 126.3625 2.8200e- 3.1200e- 127.3630 003 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Archit, Coating * 292,0079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Of-Road"" 1-01709 T.1455 -1,8091 2.9700€- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 | 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 003
Total 292.1787 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 C02e PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 :0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000* 5.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 Vendor
Worker 0.0989 0.0616 0.8538 2.7500e- 0.3689 1,5600e- 0.3704 0.0978 1.4400e- 000993 2779975 2779975 620002 6.8700e- T 280.1987 003 003 003 003
Total 0.0989 0.0616 0.8538 2.7500e- 0.3689 1.5600e- 0.3704 0.0978 1.4400e- 0.0993 277.9975 277.99756.2000e- 6.8700e- 280.1987 003 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX co S02 Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- C02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Archit. Coating :: 292.0079 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 ---•
• Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 18091 2.9700e- 0.0515 1 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 : 281.4487 | 281.4481 | 0.0154 281.8319 Total 292.1787 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
coze
Category ib/day ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 000000* 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0989 0.0616 0.8538 2.7500e- 0.3689 1.5600e- 0.3704 0.0978 1.4400e- 000993 277.9975 | 277.9975 16.2000- 6.8700e- 280.1987 003 003 003 003 003
Total 0.0989 0.0616 0.8538 2.7500e- 0.3689 1.5600e- 0.3704 0.0978 1.4400e- 0.0993 277.9975 277.9975 6.2000e- 6.8700e- 280.1987 003 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

1.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

1.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOX CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.6 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 cO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Mitigated 0.5257 0,8967 5.7120 0.0146 1,6688 0.0118 1.6806 0 4452 0,0111 0,4563 1,490.322 1,490.322 0.0727 0.0720 1.513,586 Unmitigated 0.5257 0.8967 5,7120 0,0146 1.6688 0.0118 1.6806 0.4452 0.0111 0.4563 1.180322 14022 00727 00720 1813.586

1.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Office Building, 0.00. 0.00 0.00
-...

Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 000
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 184.32 184.32 184.32 789,943 789,943 Total 184.32 184.32 184.32 789,943 789,943

1.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-Wor C-WH-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19

16.60 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.000 ' O
----.

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

1.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.540541A 0.056458: 0.173793; 0.136090; 0.025268; 0.007074: 0.011525 0.018705! 0.000610: 0.000304: 0.023606: 0.001094 0.004932 Parking Lot 0.5405414 0.056458: 0.1737937 0.136090; 0.025268: 0.007074: 0.011525 0.018705 0.000610? 0.000304. 0.023606. 0.001094 0.004932 Unrefrigerated airehouse-No 0.540541g 0.056458 - 0.173793: 0.136090 0.025268 0.007074: 0.011525: 0.018705 0.000610: 0.000304: 0.0236067 0.001094 0.004932

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Coze
Category Ib/day Ib/day
NaturalGas 0.0242 0,2204 0.1851 1.3200e- 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 264.4211 H 264.4211 5.0700e- 4.8500e-! 265.9924 Mitigated 003 003 003
NaturalGas : 00242 0.2204 0.1851 $ 1,32000-: : 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 264.4211; 264.4211 5.07000- 4500. 2650924 Unmitigated 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- Co2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day
General Office 131.562 % 1.4200e- 0.0129 0.0108 8.0000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 15.4778 15.4778 3.0000e- 2,8000e- 15.5698 Building 005 004 004 004 004 004 004
"Parking Lot 00000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000 0.0000 00000* 000000 0.0000 000000 Unrefrigerated 2116.02 -0.0228 0.2075 0.1745 1.2400e- 0.0158 0.0158 0.0158 0.0158 - 248.9433 1 248.9433 1 4.7700-14.5600 4.7700e- 256008- 2504226 Warehouse-No 003 003
Rail
Total 0.0242 0.2204 0.1851 1.3200e- 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 264.4211 264.4211 5.0700e- 4.8400e- 265.9924 003 003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 | Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day
General Office 10.131562 1.42000- 0.0129 0.0108 8.0000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 9.8000e- 15.4778 15.4778 3.0000e- 2.8000e- 15.5698 Building 004 004 004 004 004 004
*Parking Lot 0.0000 0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 000000* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 Warehouse. d 2116027 0.0228 0.2075 - 0.1743 1.2400e- 0.0158 0.0158 0.0158 0.0158 I 2489433 1 248.9435 1 4.7700e- 4,5600e- 250.4226 Total 0.0242 0.2204 0.1851 1.3200e- 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 264.4211 264.4211 5.0700e- 4.8400e- 265.9924 003 003 003

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied coze
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Mitigated 8.9039 6.9000e- | 0,0766 1.0000e- | 2.7000e. 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 0,1646 0.1646 4.3000e- 0.1753 004 005 004 004 004 004
"Unmitigated 8.9039 6.9000e- 0.0766 1.0000 : : 2.7000e. 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 27000e- 0.1646 0.1646 4.3000e- 0.1753 004 005 004 004 004 004 004

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOX S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 INBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day
Architectural 1.0115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
Consumer 7.8854 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products
Landscaping 7.0500e- 6.0000€- 0.0766 7.0000€- 27000e. 27000e- 27000e. 27000€- O 1646 T 01616 1 4.3000- 0.1753 003 004 005 004 004 004 004
Total 8.9039 6.9000e- 0.0766 1.0000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 0.1646 0.1646 4.3000e- 0.1753 004 005 004 004 004 004 004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG NOX cO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- C02 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 co2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2,5 PM2.5 Total
SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day
Architectural : 1.0115 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
...- - --.

Consumer 7.8854 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0000 00000
Products
Landscaping :7.0500e- :6.9000€ 0.0766 1.0000e- 12.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 0.1646 1- 0.1646 4.3000e- 0.1753 003 004 005 004 004 004 004 004
Total 8.9039 6.9000e- 0.0766 1.0000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 2.7000e- 0.1646 0.1646 4.3000e- 0.1753 004 005 004 004 004 004 004

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 7/15/2024 12:38 PM Northern Gateway Logistics Center - Riverside-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.0 Waste Detail

3.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
).0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.0 Vegetation
Attachment C
SWAPE Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, OSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP. Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 - present); Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 - 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003); • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 - 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989- 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 - 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 - • Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 - 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 - 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 - 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt's responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt's duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies.

Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
2 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production-related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi-volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.

Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.

Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted 3 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service-wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed-scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high-levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi-Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.

Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff.

Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 4 principles into the policy-making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.

Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
5 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter-Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Tournalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
6 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 7 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009-2011.

Attachment D
Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE SWAPE Litigation Support for the Environment 2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: prosenfeld @swape.com
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Focus on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years of experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 12 October 2022
Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health: 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator men, 201202, Recani UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 - 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 - 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Rosenfeld P. E., Spaeth K.., Hallman R., Bressler R., Smith, G., (2022) Cancer Risk and Diesel Exhaust Exposure Among Railroad Workers. Water Air Soil Pollution. 233, 171.

Remy, L.L.., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P.., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 12 October 2022
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J.J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344. ullivan. P. J. Clark. J.J.J
Valera an P.A, In American fires. ston, Mosenfuses: Elsever P. bix Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilitie nd the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-19.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49(9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS-6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA. rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A: Hesse, R.; Zapat, A. (October 3-6, 201) Air dispersion deling, of merica roanic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

FiC, L. Gonzalez, ; Bok, Hume 20-and AD). Walling in Environme-Sac ustie to East a st. Losse, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental
Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water: Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23d Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 - 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants - DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts. aul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFA and Related Chemicals Mealey's C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Kittenhouse Hotel Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. losenfeld, P.E. and Suffet. M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater an ndustrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Wate Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Northwesd, rosalid a, men sepiemb 2-24, 2002)cted from Corouser at Costal Sage Restoration.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 12 October 2022
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2022
In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022
In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Ralls, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CC0020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CS Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022
In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CC03191
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022
In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022
In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:21-cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 12 October 2022
In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiff vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022
In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022
In the Circuit Court of the 4t Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No.16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 12 October 2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021
In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-28-2021
In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021
In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 12 October 2022
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS "Conti Perdido" Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles - Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Iran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles - Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112t Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 11 of 12 October 2022
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants.

Case No. RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015
In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17" Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 12 of 12 October 2022

Menifee City CouncilJuly 16, 2025

Menifee City Council
July 16, 2025