supporting alternative transportation (Impact #3.15-6). The GP PEIR determined that future development within the Plan Area (which includes the UC Merced campus) would be subject to the 2030 General Plan Circulation Plan and Circulation Element policies that provide for future transit stations/transitways and an integrated system of pedestrian and bicycle trails. Therefore, it was determined that implementation of the GP PEIR would not conflict with alternative transportation policies, including those related to bicycles, pedestrians, and public transit. Thus, the GP PEIR concludes that there would be no impact.
The GP PEIR includes UC Merced campus within the SUDP/SOI; thus, it is assumed that the associated transit, bicycle, and pedestrian impact analysis was considered as part of the analysis. The 2020 LRDP S EIR, which evaluates the potential effects of UC Merced based on the most current LRDP, concludes that implementation of the LRDP would result in less-than-significant impacts to transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Additionally, as detailed in the 2020 LRDP SEIR, the LRDP does not propose any changes to transit service or infrastructure provided by non -University operators (UC Merced 2019).
Based on the above discussion, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts or substantially increase the severity of impacts related to conflicting with programs, plans, ordinances, or policies addressing transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Therefore, the findings of the GP PEIR regarding transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities remain valid and no new mitigation is required. The significance conclusion would remain as no impact.
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3(b), which pertains to vehicle miles travelled?
The GP PEIR does not address conflicts with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 because it was adopted prior to July 1, 2020. Under the proposed modifications, the UC Merced campus would be annexed into the City of Merced. The GP PEIR included the UC Merced campus within the SUDP/SOI and accounted for annexation of UC Merced within the impact analysis. Therefore, if VMT were analyzed within the GP PEIR it would have included the VMT associated with the UC Merced campus. Thus, annexation of the UC Merced campus into the City of Merced would result in no change in VMT as compared to the VMT if it had been analyzed in the GP PEIR .
No new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts would occur. The findings of the certified GP PEIR remain valid and no further analysis is required.
Environmental Checklist Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
3-74 UC Merced Annexation Project
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Pages 3.15-30 to 3.15-31 of the GP PEIR discuss the potential for General Plan implementation to substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses (Impact #3.15-3). The GP PEIR determined that because future development within the plan area would be subject to the 2030 General Plan Circulation Plan and Circulation Element policies, and because roadway infrastructure improvements would be designed in accordance with the City’s Roadway Design Standards, there would not be a significant increase in hazards due to design features or incompatible uses as the City General Plan is implemented. Therefore, the GP PEIR concludes that this impact would be less than significant.
The GP PEIR includes UC Merced campus within the SUDP/SOI, and, thus, it is assumed that the associated transportation hazard impact analysis was considered as part of the analysis. The 2020 LRDP SEIR, which evaluates the potential effects of UC Merced based on the most current LRDP, similarly concludes that implementation of the LRDP would result in less-than-significant impacts to hazards due to design features or incompatible uses.
Additionally, as detailed in the 2020 LRDP SEIR, the LRDP does not propose any infrastructure changes outside the campus, and on-campus infrastructure changes would be constructed according to State of California design standards, which have been developed to minimize safety issues (UC Merced 2019).
Thus, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts or substantially increase the severity of impacts related to transportation hazards, as evaluated in the GP PEIR. Therefore, the findings of the GP PEIR regarding hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses remain valid and no new mitigation is required. This impact would remain less than significant. d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
emergency access (Impact #3.15-4). The GP PEIR determined that the 2030 General Plan Circulation Plan and Policies promote emergency vehicle access to all portions of the City and plan area (which includes the UC Merced campus).
Additionally, the GP PEIR determined that the roadway improvement standards adopted by the City of Merced provide for adequate street width and secondary access to ensure that emergency vehicles have adequate access to development throughout the plan area. Therefore, the GP PEIR concluded that the implementation of the 2030 General Plan would not result in inadequate emergency access; therefore, this impact would be less than significant.
The GP PEIR includes the UC Merced campus within the SUDP/SOI; thus, it is assumed that the associated emergency access impact analysis was considered as part of the analysis. The 2020 LRDP S EIR, which evaluates the potential effects of UC Merced based on the most current LRDP, similarly concludes that implementation of the LRDP would result in less-than-significant impacts to emergency access. Additionally, as detailed in the 2020 LRDP SEIR, the LRDP does not propose any changes to infrastructure outside the campus and on -campus infrastructure changes would be constructed according to State of California design standards.
Therefore, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts or substantially increase the severity of impacts related to emergency access, as evaluated in the GP PEIR. Therefore, the findings of the GP PEIR regarding emergency access remain valid and no new mitigation is required. This impact would remain less than significant.
3.19.3 Mitigation Measures
No applicable mitigation measures for transportation were proposed in the GP PEIR. No new mitigation measures are required.
Ascent Environmental Environmental Checklist
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 3-75
3.19.4 Conclusion
There are no significant impacts that are peculiar to the project. No new impacts have occurred nor has any new information been found requiring new analysis or verification. The project would not have any potentially significant impacts or cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the GP PEIR. Therefore, the conclusions of the GP PEIR remain valid and approval of the project would not require additional environmental review.
Environmental Checklist Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
3-76 UC Merced Annexation Project
3.20 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Impact Examined in GP PEIR?
Could Annexation
Result in a New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact?*
Are there Changes in
Circumstance or New
Information Available
that Could Result in a
Substantially More
Severe Impact?
Do Mitigation Measures
and/or Design Features
Address/Resolve
Impacts, Including
Impacts That Would
Otherwise be New or
Substantially More
Severe?
Has a California Native
American Tribe requested
consultation in accordance
with Public Resources Code
section 21080.3.1(b)?
Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change
in the significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined in
Public Resources Code
section 21074 as either a
site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is
geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope
of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with
cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and
that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing
in the California Register of
Historical Resources, or in a
local register of historical
resources as defined in
Public Resources Code
section 5020.1(k)?
Not Analyzed No No N/A
b) A resource determined by
the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported
by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to
criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resource Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency
shall consider the
significance of the resource
to a California Native
American tribe?
Not Analyzed No No Yes
*Determination does not factor implementation of previously adopted mitigation.
Ascent Environmental Environmental Checklist
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 3-77
3.20.1 Environmental Setting
AB 52 (Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014) established a formal consultation process for California Native American tribes as part of CEQA and equates significant impacts on tribal cultural resources with significant environmental impacts (Public Resources Code Section 21084.2). AB 52 consultation requirements went into effect on July 1, 2015, for all projects that had not already published a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, or published a Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report prior to that date (Section 11 [c]). Specifically, AB 52 requires that “prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration , or environmental impact report for a project, the lead agency shall begin consultation” (21808.3.1 [a]), and that “the lead agency may certify an environmental impact report or adopt a mitigated negative declaration for a project with a significant impact on an identified tribal cultural resource only if” consultation is formally concluded (21082.3[d]).
However, in the case of the current project, the lead agency has prepared this addendum to the previously certified GP PEIR, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines. An addendum was determined to be the most appropriate document because none of the conditions described in Section 15162, calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR, have occurred. The addendum addresses minor technical changes or additions and confirms that the project is consistent with what was previously analyzed under the GP PEIR. As such, the addendum will not result in an additional certification; therefore, the AB 52 procedures specified in Public Resources Code Section s 21080.3. 1(d) and 21080.3.2 do not apply and no tribal consultation under AB 52 is required.
3.20.2 Discussion
Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
This topic is addressed in Section 3.20.2(b) below.
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Because tribal cultural resources were not a resource under CEQA until 2015, the GP PEIR did not evaluate the potential for implementation of the General Plan to result in impacts on tribal cultural resources .
The 2020 LRDP SEIR evaluates the potential for implementation of the 2020 LRDP to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource. In accordance with AB 52 , UC Merced contacted the eight tribes traditionally associated with the 2020 LRDP planning area and did not receive any requests for formal consultation. No known prehistoric sites have been documented within the planning area and no cultural resources have been encountered during past development of the UC Merced campus. Therefore, the 2020 LRDP planning area is not expected to contain tribal cultural resources (UC Merced 2019). Furthermore, the cultural resources mitigation measures (MM CUL-2 and MM CUL-3) adopted for the 2009 LRDP would apply to the new facilities proposed in the 2020 LRDP. As discussed in Section 3.7, this mitigation commits UC Merced to formally evaluate previously evaluated historic resources for CRHR eligibility, and if eligible, develop and implement a Historic Properties Treatment Plan. In Environmental Checklist Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
3-78 UC Merced Annexation Project
addition, this mitigation commits UC Merced and its contractors to follow specific protocols in the event that buried cultural resources are encountered during construction activities (UC Merced 2009). Therefore, development of the UC Merced campus in accordance with the 2020 LRDP would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource; this impact would be less than significant and would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to a cumulative impact on tribal cultural resources.
Based on the above discussion, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new significant impacts on tribal cultural resources and no mitigation is required.
3.20.3 Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures for tribal cultural resources were proposed in the GP PEIR. 2009 LRDP EIR Mitigation Measures MM CUL-2 and MM CUL-3 (see Appendix B) commit UC Merced and its contractors to follow specific protocols in the event that buried cultural resources are encountered during construction activities. No new mitigation measures are required.
3.20.4 Conclusion
There are no significant impacts that are peculiar to the project. No new impacts have occurred nor has any new information been found requiring new analysis or verification. The project would not have any potentially significant impacts or cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the GP PEIR. Therefore, the conclusions of the GP PEIR remain valid and approval of the project would not require additional environmental review.
Ascent Environmental Environmental Checklist
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 3-79
3.21 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Impact Examined in GP PEIR?
Could Annexation
Result in a New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact?*
Are there Changes in
Circumstance or New
Information Available
that Could Result in a
Substantially More
Severe Impact?
Do Mitigation Measures
and/or Design Features
Address/Resolve
Impacts, Including
Impacts That Would
Otherwise be New or
Substantially More
Severe?
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the
relocation or construction of
construction of new or
expanded water, wastewater
treatment or stormwater
drainage, electric power,
natural gas, or
telecommunication facilities,
the construction or
relocation of which could
cause significant
environmental effects?
Impact #3.16-2: The proposed
project would require or result
in the construction of new
water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the
construction of which could
cause significant effects, pp.
3.16-8 and 3.16-9
Impact #3.16-3: The proposed
project would require or result
in the construction of new
storm water drainage facilities
or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant
environmental effects, pp.
3.16-10 to 3.16-11
No No N/A
b) Have insufficient water
supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably
foreseeable future
development during
normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
Impact #3.16-4: The proposed
project would require new or
expanded water supply
entitlements, pp. 3.16-11 to
3.16-13
No No N/A
c) Result in a determination by
the wastewater treatment
provider that serves or may
serve the project that it has
inadequate capacity to
serve the project’s projected
demand, in addition to the
provider’s existing
commitments?
Impact #3.16-5: Result in a
determination by the
wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may
serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve
the project’s projected
demand in addition to the
provider’s existing
commitments, pp. 3.16-13 to
3.16-15
No No N/A
d) Generate solid waste in
excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of
the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise
impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
Impact #3.16-6: The proposed
project would increase
demand for solid waste
disposal services, pp. 3.16-15
and 3.16-16
No No N/A
Environmental Checklist Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
3-80 UC Merced Annexation Project
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Impact Examined in GP PEIR?
Could Annexation
Result in a New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact?*
Are there Changes in
Circumstance or New
Information Available
that Could Result in a
Substantially More
Severe Impact?
Do Mitigation Measures
and/or Design Features
Address/Resolve
Impacts, Including
Impacts That Would
Otherwise be New or
Substantially More
Severe?
e) Fail to comply with federal,
state, and local
management and reduction
statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?
Impact #3.16-7: Will the
proposed project comply with
federal, state, and local
statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?, pp.
3.16-16
No No N/A
*Determination does not factor implementation of previously adopted mitigation.
3.21.1 Environmental Setting
The GP PEIR describes water supply, wastewater treatment, storm drainage, and solid waste . Applicable federal, State, and local regulations are also explained. No substantial change in the environmental setting described in the GP PEIR Section 3.16, “Utilities/Services,” has occurred since certification of the GP PEIR. Relevant regulations and planning documents adopted subsequent to publication of the GP PEIR are described below.
WATER
The City of Merced’s 2020 UWMP was adopted in August of 2021. The population forecasts used in the 2020 UWMP include the forecasted population for UC Merced based on the 2020 LRDP , 2020 LRDP SEIR, and UC Merced Tomorrow Long Range Development Plan. In 2020, the City supplied 20,076 acre-feet (AF) of potable water and 4,050 AF of recycled water. Potable water demands are projected to increase to 31,825 AF by 2040 due to increases in the City and UC Merced population. The City’s water supply is projected to sufficiently meet expected demands through 2040 through the installation of additional groundwater wells and construction of a 10 million mgd surface water treatment plant. The surface water treatment plant is projected to use surface water supplied by Merced Irrigation District and begin operation by 2030 (City of Merced 2021).
WASTEWATER AND STORMWATER
Since adoption of the GP PEIR, the City of Merced released a Wastewater Collection System Master Plan in December 2017. This plan assesses the capacity of the existing sewer system to serve the City’s wastewater collection needs, as well as provides recommendations to address existing sewer system deficiencies and to serve the growth envisioned in the City’s General Plan. This plan accounts for flows anticipated from development of the UC Merced campus in accordance with the 2009 LRDP, which would generate approximately 1.13 million gallons per day (Mgal/d) during dry weather flows and 2.54 Mgal/d during peak wet weather flows (City of Merced 2017).
The City has not released a new master plan for stormwater drainage since adoption of the GP PEIR. The most recent Storm Drain Master Plan, released in April 2002, was developed to facilitate the planning and impl ementation of drainage infrastructure improvements needed to accommodate stormwater runoff under buildout conditions in the City’s 2015 General Plan (City of Merced 2002).
ENERGY
As described in Section 3.8, “Energy,” the State has increased the standards for building energy and vehicle fuel efficiency since adoption of the GP PEIR.
Ascent Environmental Environmental Checklist
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 3-81
SOLID WASTE
Since adoption of the GP PEIR, additional laws and regulations have been passed that set forth more stringent solid waste reduction goals, including AB 341 of 2012, which increases California’s waste diversion goal from 50 percent under AB 939 of 1989 to 75 percent by 2020.
3.21.2 Discussion
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Pages 3.16-8 and 3.16-9 of the GP PEIR discuss the potential for General Plan implementation to result in significant environmental effects from the relocation or construction of new or expanded water and wastewater treatment, facilities (Impact #3.16-2). As discussed in the GP PEIR, future development would require new water supply and wastewater treatment facilities. However, project-level CEQA environmental review would be needed to determine the extent of environmental impacts and identify relevant mitigation measures, if warranted. The General Plan includes several policies and standards designed to address environmental impacts associated with the development of new water conveyance and wastewater treatment facilities (UE-1.2 of the Urban Expansion Element, OS-5.1 of the Open Space Element, and P-1.3 and P-3.1 of the Public Services and Facilities Element). In addition, the City has adopted BMPs designed to reduce water consumption and waste. Furthermore, the environmental impacts from expansion of the wastewater treatment plant were evaluated and mitigation was identified as part of a separate project. Therefore, the GP PEIR concluded that impacts related to the relocation, construction, or expansion of water and wastewater treatment facilities would be less than significant, and no significant cumulative impacts were identified (City of Merced 2010).
Pages 3.16-10 and 3.16-11 of the GP PEIR discuss the potential for General Plan implementation to result in significant environmental effects from the relocation or construction of new or expanded stormwater drainage facilities (Impact #3.16-3). As discussed in the GP PEIR, future development can result in increased runoff, requiring the need for on- or off-site flood control facilities. General Plan policies would ensure that new development is designed based on site - specific drainage conditions, provides or pays impact fees toward public infrastructure improvements, and complies with the City’s Storm Water Master Plan (Policy P-1.3, P-5.1, and P-5.2 of the Public Services and Facilities Element).
Therefore, the GP PEIR concluded that impacts related to the relocation, construction, or expansion of stormwater drainage facilities would be less than significant, and no significant cumulative impacts were identified (City of Merced 2010).
Annexation of UC Merced would not result in new environmental effects from construction of utility infrastructure.
The City currently provides water service to UC Merced. Wastewater generated on the campus is currently conveyed to the City’s WWTP for treatment and disposal. As noted above, infrastructure required to serve buildout of the UC Merced campus is in place or currently planned through established pre-annexation agreements.
The GP PEIR evaluated the effects of utility extensions required to serve the UC Merced population anticipated in the 2009 LRDP. As evaluated in the certified 2020 LRDP SEIR, the campus’ water demand in 2030 is expected be substantially lower than anticipated in the 2009 LRDP and the existing water main and well are expected to be adequate to serve the campus through 2030 (UC Merced 2019).
With respect to the effect of the campus development on treatment capacity at the City’s WWTP, the GP PEIR was based on the 2009 LRDP EIR analysis, which showed that the campus would generate 1.13 mgd of wastewater at full development. The 2020 LRDP SEIR indicates that per capita water use and total population are now understood to be less than assumed in the 2009 LRDP EIR. According to this analysis, the campus would generate an additional 0.10 mgd with the addition of 6,700 students, faculty, and staff between 2020 and 2030. Total wastewater generation Environmental Checklist Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
3-82 UC Merced Annexation Project
would be 0.27 mgd by 2030. This is substantially lower than 1.13 mgd estimated and analyzed in the 2009 LRDP EIR (UC Merced 2019).
Although there would be a substantially lower flow from the campus than previously pr ojected, the 2020 LRDP SEIR determined that the existing sewer line on G Street in the City of Merced would not be adequate to handle campus flows through 2030. A new line or an upgrade to the existing line on G Street would be needed (UC Merced 2019).
These improvements would likely take place within roadway shoulders or under the pavement consistent with current City practice and are identified in the 2017 Draft Sewer Master Plan developed by the City. As described above, the General Plan includes several policies and standards designed to address environmental impacts associated with the development of new water conveyance and wastewater treatment facilities. The offsite improvements to the G Street trunk line are within the scope of the utility expansions evaluated in the GP PEIR.
Since certification of the 2020 LRDP SEIR, the City released a draft Wastewater Collection System Master Plan , which sets forth various improvements that may be required throughout the City. Although the draft report indicates that the available capacity of the G Street trunk is not sufficient to convey flow from the entitled properties expected to utilize this facility and recommends that G Street trunk main be upgraded to a 24-inch diameter pipe between Bellevue Road and Cardella Road, the City is currently reevaluating the plan and anticipates that the scope of the identified improvements may be reduced. Furthermore, because the GP EIR evaluated the physical effects of utility extensions within the SOI, new or substantially more severe impacts would not occur.
In compliance with the UC Policy on Sustainable Practices, power that will be needed by the campus at buildout will be obtained from a number of renewable and alternative technologies, including wind turbines, fuel cells , and photovoltaic systems. In light of the lower estimated demand for electricity in 2030 and the campus initiatives to obtain electricity from on-site renewal sources, no off-site improvements such as additional transmission lines would be required. Similarly, no off-site improvements to provide natural gas to the campus would be required (UC Merced 2019). Furthermore, development of the UC Merced campus would comply with the various plans, policies, and regulations to conserve and reduce demand for water and energy resources (UC Merced 2019).
Based on the above discussion, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts from the relocation, construction, or expansion of utility infrastructure. Therefore, the findings of the GP PEIR regarding utility infrastructure remain valid and no new mitigation is required. This impact would remain less than significant. b) Have insufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Pages 3.16-11 to 3.16-13 of the GP PEIR discuss whether there would be sufficient water supplies to serve General Plan implementation (Impact #3.16-4). As described in the GP PEIR, there are sufficient water resources to meet the water demands of General Plan buildout, but the use of groundwater resources would result in a depletion of groundwater reserves and decline in the groundwater levels. The City implements BMPs for water conservat ion, as listed in the City’s Urban Water Management Plan. In addition, General Plan policies would ensure that adequate water supply and distribution facilities are developed to accommodate growth in the planning area (Policies P -3.1 and P-3.2 of the Public Services and Facilities Element). Because no new or expanded water entitlements would be required, the GP PEIR concluded that impacts related to sufficient water supplies would be less than significant, and no significant cumulative impacts were identified (City of Merced 2010).
The City currently provides water to UC Merced pursuant to a pre-annexation agreement. The water demand associated with development in accordance with the 2020 LRDP was accounted for in the City’s 2020 UWMP , which concluded that adequate groundwater supply was available to meet water demands in the service area during normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years. The GSP indicates that agricultural and urban groundwater demand in the Merced Subbasin would need to be reduced by approximately 10 percent in order to balance out the change in groundwater storage over a long-term average condition. UC Merced has implemented projects (including advanced irrigation systems and reduced irrigation, planting drought resistant species, altering condenser plant operations, and a system for reporting water leaks) to reduce water use in an effort to achieve water neutrality and has reduced water Ascent Environmental Environmental Checklist
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 3-83
demand by more than 10 percent (UC Merced 2019). Annexation of the UC Merced campus would not affect the existing supply or demand for water in the City’s existing service area.
Based on the above discussion, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts.
Therefore, the findings of the GP PEIR regarding sufficient water supplies remai n valid and no new mitigation is required. This impact would remain less than significant. c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand, in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Pages 3.16-13 to 3.16-15 of the GP PEIR discuss the potential for General Plan implementation to result in a wastewater treatment demand that exceeds the provider’s capacity (Impact #3.16-5). As described in the GP PEIR, the existing wastewater collection system in the City did not have adequate capacity to handle wastewater flows form General Plan buildout. The City was in the process of expanding the existing wastewater treatment plant and developed a Sewer Collection Master Plan, which identified additional improvements to the wastewater treatment system that were needed to accommodate future development in the planning area. General Plan policies would ensure that the City provides for an adequate wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal system to meet future needs and that new developments pay their fair share of public facility and infrastructure improvements (Policies P -
1.2, P-1.3, P-4.1, and P-4.2 of the Public Services and Facilities Element). Therefore, the GP PEIR concluded that impacts related to wastewater treatment would be less than significant, and no significant cumulative impacts were identified (City of Merced 2010).
The City currently provides wastewater treatment to UC Merced pursuant to a pre -annexation agreement (Merced County 2012). The GP PEIR evaluated the development and annexation of the UC Merced campus, as proposed in the 2009 LRDP. Therefore, impacts related to wastewater treatment from development of the UC Merc ed campus in accordance with the 2009 LRDP are consistent with the impacts from implementation of the GP PEIR, described above.
The 2020 LRDP is the current planning document for development of the UC Merced campus. Because UC Merced is projected to grow at a slower pace than previously anticipated, development of the UC Merced campus in accordance with the 2020 LRDP would not increase wastewater flows beyond those anticipated for the 2009 LRDP. In addition, the 2020 LRDP SEIR determined that the existing wastewater treatment plant would have adequate capacity to serve the wastewater treatment demands of the campus, even when accounting for increases in flows from other sources (UC Merced 2019). Annexation of the UC Merced campus would not affect the demand for wastewater treatment in the City’s existing service area.
Based on the above discussion, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts related to wastewater treatment. Therefore, the findings of the GP PEIR regarding wastewater treatment remain valid and no new mitigation is required. This impact would remain less than significant. d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
This topic is addressed in Section 3.21.2(e) below.
e) Fail to comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Pages 3.16-15 and 3.16-16 of the GP PEIR discuss the potential for General Plan implementation to increase demand for solid waste disposal services (Impact #3.16-6) and conflict with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste (Impact #3.16-7). As described in the GP PEIR, the Merced County Highway 59 Landfill has available capacity to serve General Plan buildout. The City complies with all statutes and regulations related to solid waste, including diversion of solid waste from local landfills in compliance with AB 939. G eneral Plan policies would Environmental Checklist Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
3-84 UC Merced Annexation Project
ensure that the City implements programs to reduce the amount of solid waste generated and increase recycling efforts in the City (Policies P-6.1 and P-6.2 of the Public Services and Facilities Element). Therefore, the GP PEIR concluded that impacts related to solid waste would be less than significant, and no significant cumulative impacts were identified (City of Merced 2010).
Annexation of UC Merced would not increase the generation of solid waste disposal in the existing servi ce area. The GP PEIR evaluated the development and annexation of the UC Merced campus, as proposed in the 2009 LRDP.
Therefore, impacts related to solid waste from development of the UC Merced campus in accordance with the 2009 LRDP are consistent with the impacts from implementation of the GP PEIR, described above.
The 2020 LRDP is the current planning document for development of the UC Merced campus. Because UC Merced is projected to grow at a slower pace than previously anticipated, development of the U C Merced campus in accordance with the 2020 LRDP would not increase campus generated solid waste when compared to the 2009 LRDP. In addition, the LRDP EIR determined that the Merced County Highway 59 Landfill would have adequate capacity to serve development of the campus in accordance with the 2020 LRDP. Furthermore, UC Merced has committed to improving recycling and reuse programs to work towards meeting UC Sustainable Practices Policy goal for achieving zero waste (UC Merced 2019). These programs, including the 2020 Zero Waste Plan, would reduce effects compared to the assumptions in the 2009 LRDP EIR, as evaluated in the GP P EIR.
Based on the above discussion, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts related to solid waste. Therefore, the findings of the GP PEIR regarding solid waste remain valid and no new mitigation is required. This impact would remain less than significant.
3.21.3 Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures for utilities and service systems were proposed in the GP PEIR. No new mitigation measures are required.
3.21.4 Conclusion
There are no significant impacts that are peculiar to the project. No new impacts have occurred nor has any new information been found requiring new analysis or verification. The project would not have any potentially significant impacts or cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the GP PEIR. Therefore, the conclusions of the GP PEIR remain valid and approval of the project would not require additional envir onmental review.
Ascent Environmental Environmental Checklist
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 3-85
3.22 WILDFIRE
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Impact Examined in GP PEIR?
Could Annexation
Result in a New or
Substantially
More Severe
Impact?*
Are there Changes in
Circumstance or New
Information Available
that Could Result in a
Substantially More
Severe Impact?
Do Mitigation Measures
and/or Design Features
Address/Resolve
Impacts, Including
Impacts That Would
Otherwise be New or
Substantially More
Severe?
Is the project located in or
near state responsibility areas
or lands classified as high fire
hazard severity zones?
If located in or near state
responsibility areas or lands
classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would
the project:
The northeast portion of the planning area that is east of Le Grand Canal is identified as a moderate FHSZ within an SRA.
a) Substantially impair an
adopted emergency
response plan or
emergency evacuation
plan?
Impact #3.7-6: Impair
implementation of or
physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation
plan, p. 3.7-13
No No N/A
b) Due to slope, prevailing
winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks,
and thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant
concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled
spread of a wildfire?
Not Analyzed No No N/A
c) Require the installation of
associated infrastructure
(such as roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources,
power lines or other
utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the
environment?
Not Analyzed No No N/A
d) Expose people or structures
to significant risks, including
downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post-fire
slope instability, or drainage
changes?
Not Analyzed No No N/A
*Determination does not factor implementation of previously adopted mitigation.
Environmental Checklist Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
3-86 UC Merced Annexation Project
3.22.1 Environmental Setting
This resource section reflects the updated State CEQA Guidelines that became effective on December 28, 2018, after the GP PEIR was certified. As provided in CEQA Guidelines Section 15007, “amendments to the guidelines apply prospectively only.” CEQA documents must meet the “content requirements in effect when the document was set out for public review,” and “shall not need to be revised to conform to any new content requirements in guideline amendments taking effect before the document is finally approved.” As directed by Section 15007, the GP PEIR does not need to be revised to conform to the new wildfire requirements.
Information was known about the effect of wildfire on the environment at the time the GP PEIR was prepared and, thus, it could have been evaluated. In addition, the change in the State CEQA Guidelines does not constitute new significant information under CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines 15162), as it does not constitute a new impact caused by the changes proposed in the project.
The following thresholds are specific to areas within or near State Responsibility Areas (SRAs) or Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs) classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ). An SRA is an area where the State is financially responsible for the prevention and suppression of wildfires. Alternatively, an LRA is an area in which local governments or fire districts, rather than the State, are responsible for fire prevention and suppression. CAL FIRE creates Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps for areas within the SRA and prepares recommended Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps for areas within the LRA. Hazard ratings range from Moderate to Very High and are based on the phy sical conditions that contribute to the likelihood that an area will burn over a 30 - to 50-year period.
The majority of the 2020 LRDP planning area is within an LRA, with the area north of Bellevue Road designated as a LRA moderate FHSZ. The northeast portion of the planning area that is east of Le Grand Canal is identified as a moderate FHSZ within an SRA (CAL FIRE 2007). The Merced County Fire Department provides primary response services to the LRA and offers mutual automatic aid with CAL FIRE to many of the rural foothill and rangeland areas.
Eastern portions of Merced County were recently evacuated in response to the SCU Lightning Complex Fire, which began on August 18, 2020 and spanned multiple locations throughout Santa Clara County, Alameda County, Contra Costa County, San Joaquin County, Merced County, and Stanislaus County. The fire burned 396,624 acres and was contained on October 1, 2020 (CAL FIRE 2020). The SCU Lightning Complex Fire occurred over 50 miles southwest of the area proposed for annexation. No recent fire events have occurred within or near the annexation area.
3.22.2 Discussion
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Refer to Section 3.11.2(f). As discussed in Section 3.11, “Hazards and Hazardous Materials,” above, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts on emergency response and evacuation plans. Specifically, the 2020 LRDP would be subject to the same emergency response and evacuation plans and procedures as t hose assumed in the GP PEIR, including the UC Merced Emergency Operations Plan and Crisis Communications Plan.
Furthermore, safety planning documents would continue to be prepared and updated in accordance with applicable regulations, including California Health and Safety Code Section 25517.5. Therefore, the findings of the GP PEIR regarding emergency response and evacuation plans remain valid and no new mitigation is required. This impact would remain less than significant.
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
The GP PEIR does not specifically evaluate the potential for implementation of the General Plan to expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire . However, as discussed in Section 3.11.2(g), annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts . Specifically, the 2020 Ascent Environmental Environmental Checklist
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 3-87
LRDP planning area would be subject to the same fire risk as the 2009 LRDP planning area evaluated in the GP PEIR.
In addition, the 2020 LRDP would be subject to the same standards and management practices for fire protection and prevention. Annexation would not exacerbate wildfire risks. Therefore, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts related to exposing project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire.
c) Require the installation of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? The GP PEIR does not specifically evaluate the potential for implementation of the General Plan to exacerbate fire risk from the installation of infrastructure. However, there have not been any changes to the infrastructure proposed to support development of the campus since the 2009 LRDP. Annexation would not require the installation of new infrastructure. Therefore, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts related to the exacerbation of fire risk from the installation of infrastructure. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
The GP PEIR does not specifically evaluate the potential for implementation of the General Plan to expose people or structures to significant post-fire risks. However, the 2020 LRDP does not include any changes to the 2009 LRDP that would expose people and structures to new fire post-fire risks. Specifically, the revised LRDP would not place new structures in areas susceptible to flooding or landslides (refer to Section 3.9, “Geology and Soils,” and Section 3.12, “Hydrology and Water Quality” for additional information about geologic and flood hazards) and would not increase the potential for wildfire (see 3.11, “Hazards and Hazardous Materials”). Therefore, annexation of the UC Merced campus would not result in any new impacts related to post-fire risks such as downslope flooding or landslides.
3.22.3 Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures for wildfire were proposed in the GP PEIR and no new mitigation measures are required.
3.22.4 Conclusion
There are no significant impacts that are peculiar to the project. No new impacts have occurred nor has any new information been found requiring new analysis or verification. The project would not have any potentially significant impacts or cumulative impacts that were not discussed in the GP PEIR. Therefore, the conclusions of the GP PEIR remain valid and approval of the project would not require additional environmental review.
Environmental Checklist Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
3-88 UC Merced Annexation Project
This page intentionally left blank.
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 4-1
4 REFERENCES
CAL FIRE. See California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2007 (September). Draft Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA.
Available: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6716/fhszl06_1_map24.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2021. ———. 2020. SCU Lightning Complex. Accessed October 11, 2020. Available:
https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2020/8/18/scu-lightning-complex/ City of Merced. 2002 (April). City of Merced Storm Drain Master Plan. Prepared by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Available: https://www.cityofmerced.org/home/showpublisheddocument/7358/637038734396530000.
Accessed November 29, 2021.
———. 2010 (August). Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, City of Merced, Merced Vision 2030 General Plan.
State Clearinghouse No. 2008071069. Merced, CA. Prepared by Quad Knopf, Roseville, CA. ———. 2012 (January). Merced Vision 2030 General Plan. Available at:
https://www.cityofmerced.org/departments/development-services/planning-division/merced-vision-2030- general-plan.
———. 2017 (December). City of Merced Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. Prepared by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Available:
https://www.cityofmerced.org/home/showpublisheddocument/8632/637354170547800000. Accessed November 29, 2021.
———. 2021 (August). 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Prepared by Black Water Consulting Engineering, Inc.
Available: https://www.cityofmerced.org/departments/public-works/water/urban-water-management-plan.
Accessed January 20, 2022.
Merced County. 2012 (November). 2030 Merced County General Plan Update Draft Program Environmental Impact Report. State Clearinghouse No. 20 11041067. Merced, CA. Prepared by Merced County Planning and Community Development Department in consultation with Environmental Planning Partners, Inc., Sloughhouse, CA. Available:
https://web2.co.merced.ca.us/pdfs/planning/generalplan/DraftGP/DEIR/merced_county_deir_2012_11_30.pdf.
Accessed November 29, 2021.
———. n.d. Interactive Map Viewer. Available:
https://map.co.merced.ca.us/H5/Index.html?configBase=http://map.co.merced.ca.us/Geocortex/Essentials/RE ST/sites/mapmerced/viewers/H5/virtualdirectory/Resources/Config/Default. Accessed November 24, 2021.
Merced SGMA. See Merced Sustainable Groundwater Management Agencies.
Merced Sustainable Groundwater Management Agencies. 2018 (August). Merced Subbasin Groundwater Sustainabilit y Fact Sheet. Available: http://mercedsgma.org/assets/pdf/Merced-SGMA-factsheet.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2021.
———. 2019 (November). Merced Groundwater Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan. Available:
http://www.mercedsgma.org/assets/pdf/gsp-sections/Merced-Subbasin-GSP-no-appendices_2019-11-12.pdf.
Accessed November 24, 2021.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. 2012. Ambient Air Quality Standards & Valley Attainment Status .
Available: https://www.valleyair.org/aqinfo/attainment.htm. Accessed November 24, 2021. ———. 2015 (March). Air Quality Thresholds of Significance – Criteria Pollutants. Available:
http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/0714-GAMAQI-Criteria-Pollutant-Thresholds-of-Significance.pdf.
Accessed November 24, 2021.
References Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
4-2 UC Merced Annexation Project
———. 2021. Frequently Asked Questions. Available: https://ww2.valleyair.org/about/frequently-asked-questions/.
Accessed November 24, 2021.
———. n.d. Air Quality Thresholds of Significance – Toxic Air Contaminants. Available:
http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/0714-GAMAQI-TACs-Thresholds-of-Significance.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2021.
SJVAPCD. See San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.
UC. See University of California.
UC Merced. See University of California, Merced.
University of California. 2020. Policy on Sustainable Practices. Available:
https://policy.ucop.edu/doc/3100155/SustainablePractices. Accessed November 24, 2021.
University of California, Merced. 2009.UC Merced and University Community Plan Project: Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report. SCH No. 2008041009. Prepared by Impact Sciences, ICF Jones & Stokes, and Fehr & Peers.
———. 2017. Sustainability Strategic Plan. Available:
https://ucmerced.app.box.com/s/18gvx015icq9jxwlg2h3thqtqxeu8jpo. Accessed November 24, 2021. ———. 2018a (April). Proposed 2018 Long Range Development Plan Initial Study. Merced, CA. ———. 2018b. Climate Action Plan. Available: https://ucmerced.app.box.com/s/xxxbzvzrcavupqxhjay5hhxu8hgchqa4.
Accessed November 24, 2021.
———. 2019 (September). UC Merced 2020 LRDP Draft SEIR. Merced, CA.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2020 (April). QuickFacts, Merced County, California; Merced city, California. Available:
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/mercedcountycalifornia,mercedcitycalifornia/PST045219 .
Accessed November 24, 2021.
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 5-1
5 REPORT PREPARERS
Mike Parker ................................................................................................................................................................................................ Principal Jessica Babcock......................................................................................................................................................................... Project Manager Nicole Greenfield ......................................................................................................................................................... Environmental Planner Alison Fuller ............................................................................................................................................................................................... Biologist Zachary Miller................................................................................................................................................................Transportation Planner
Report Preparers Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
5-2 UC Merced Annexation Project
This page intentionally left blank.
Appendix A
Summary of Mitigation Measures
in the 2020 LRDP SEIR
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project A-1
LRDP MM AQ-1a: The construction contractors shall be required via contract specifications to use construction equipment rated by the U.S. EPA as meeting Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower.
LRDP MM AQ-1b: UC Merced shall include in all construction contracts the measures specified in SJVAPCD Regulation VIII (as it may be amended for application to all construction projects generally) to reduce fugitive dust impacts, including but not limited to the following:
• All disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively utilized for construction purpose, shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water, chemical stabilizer/suppressant, or vegetative ground cover.
• All on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.
• All land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land leveling, grading, cut and fill, and demolition activities shall be effectively controlled of fugitive dust emissions using application of water or by presoaking. • When materials are transported off-site, all material shall be covered, effectively wetted to limit visible dust emissions, or at least 6 inches of freeboard space from the top of the container shall be maintained. • All operations shall limit or expeditiously remove the accumulation of mud or dirt from adjacent public streets at least once every 24 hours when operations are occurring. (The use of dry rotary brushes is expressly prohibited except where preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit visible dust emissions. Use of blower devices is expressly forbidden.)
• Following the addition of materials to, or the removal of materials from, the surface of outdoor storage piles, storage piles shall be effectively stabilized of fugitive dust emissions by using sufficient water or chemical stabilizer/ suppressant.
LRDP MM AQ-2a: UC Merced shall implement the following measures to reduce emissions from vehicles:
• Provide pedestrian-enhancing infrastructure to encourage pedestrian activity and discourage vehicle use. • Provide bicycle facilities to encourage bicycle use instead of driving, such as bicycle parking, bicycle lanes, bicycle lockers; and showers and changing facilities for employees. • Provide preferential carpool and vanpool parking for non-residential uses. • Provide transit-enhancing infrastructure to promote the use of public transportation, such as covered bus stops and information kiosks.
• Provide facilities, such as electric car charging stations and a CNG refueling station, to encourage the use of alternative-fuel vehicles.
• Improve traffic flows and congestion by timing of traffic signals at intersections adjacent to the campus to facilitate uninterrupted travel.
• Work with campus transit provider to replace CatTracks buses with either electric buses or buses operated on alternative fuels.
• Work with the City of Merced to establish park and ride lots and provide enhanced transit service between the park and ride lots and the campus.
• Replace campus fleet vehicles with electric vehicles or vehicles that operate on alternative fuels. • Reduce the number of daily vehicle trips by providing more housing on campus.
LRDP MM AQ-2b: UC Merced shall implement the following measures to reduce emissions from area and energy sources, as feasible:
• Utilize low-VOC cleaning supplies and low-VOC paints (100 grams/liter or less) in building maintenance. • Utilize electric equipment for landscape maintenance. • Plant low maintenance landscaping.
Appendix A Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
A-2 UC Merced Annexation Project
• Implement a public information program for resident students to minimize the use of personal consumer products that result in ROG emissions, including information on alternate products. • Instead of natural gas water heaters, install solar water heating systems.
LRDP MM BIO-4: A qualified wildlife biologist shall conduct visual surveys of the development area during the flight season for the Crotch bumble bee (late February through late October). Between two and four evenly spaced surveys shall be conducted for the highest detection probability, including surveys in early spring (late March/early April) and early summer (late June/July). Surveys shall take place when temperatures are above 60°F, preferably on sunny days with low wind speeds (e.g., less than 8 miles per hour) and at least 2 hours after sunrise and 3 hours before sunset. On warm days (e.g., over 85°F), bumble bees will be more active in the mornings and evenings. Surveyors shall conduct transect surveys focusing on detection of foraging bumble bees and underground nests using visual aids such as butterfly binoculars. If no Crotch bumble bees or potential Crotch bumble bees are detected, no further mitigation is required.
If Crotch bumble bees or potential Crotch bumble bees are observed within the development area, a plan to protect Crotch bumble bee nests and individuals shall be developed and implemented in consultation with CDFW. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following measures:
• Specifications for construction timing and sequencing requirements (e.g., avoidance of raking, mowing, tilling, or other ground disturbance until late March to protect overwintering queens); • Preconstruction surveys conducted within 30 days and consistent with any current available CDFW standards prior to the start of ground disturbing activities to identify active nests; • Establishment of appropriate no-disturbance buffers for nest sites and construction monitoring by a qualified biologist to ensure compliance;
• Restrictions associated with construction practices, equipment, or materials that may harm bumble bees (e.g., avoidance of pesticides/herbicides, BMPs to minimize the spread of invasive plant species);
• Provisions to avoid Crotch bumble bees or potential Crotch bumble bees if observed away from a nest during project activity (e.g., ceasing of project activities until the animal has left the work area on its own volition); and
• Prescription of an appropriate restoration seed mix targeted for the Crotch bumble bee, including native plant species known to be visited by native bumble bee species and containing a mix of flowering plant species with continual floral availability through the entire active season of the Crotch bumble bee (March to October).
LRDP MM BIO-9a: Avoid and minimize impacts on native birds protected under the MBTA, including listed species, fully protected species, special-status species of concern, and raptors and passerines. (a) Limit ground disturbance activities to the non-breeding season and remove potential unoccupied breeding habitat during the non-breeding season if possible. If breeding season work is required, conduct take avoidance (tree, shrub, and ground) nest surveys to identify and avoid active nests. • If feasible, UC Merced shall conduct all project-related activities including (but not limited to) tree and shrub removal, other vegetation clearing, grading, or other ground disturbing activities during the non- breeding season (typically between September 16 and February 14). • If activities are scheduled to occur during the breeding season (typically between February 15 through September 15), applicable CDFW and/or USFWS permit conditions in the permits issued to the University related to bird surveys must be followed. In addition, a UC Merced-approved qualified avian biologist, with knowledge of the species to be surveyed, shall conduct focused nesting surveys within 15 days prior to the start of project or ground-disturbing activities and within the appro-priate habitat. The qualified avian biologist shall determine the exact survey duration and location (typically 500 feet around the work area) based on the work conditions and shall take into account existing applicable CDFW or USFWS permit conditions.
Ascent Environmental Appendix A
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 3
• If an unoccupied nest (without birds or eggs) of a non-listed or fully protected species (as determined by the qualified avian biologist) is found, the nest shall be removed under the direction of the qualified avian biologist.
• If an active nest is located, a qualified avian biologist shall establish an appropriate no -disturbance buffer around the nest making sure that any buffer width required by the University’s permit obligations is followed.
A 500-foot buffer is recommended for listed or fully protected nesting birds (or another buffer determined in consultation with CDFW and/or USFWS), a 250-foot buffer around raptors, and a 75-foot buffer around passerines. If work activities cause or contribute to a bird being flushed from a nest, the buffer width shall be adjusted to avoid and minimize impacts to nesting birds. • A qualified avian biologist shall monitor the nest site regularly during work activities to ensure that the nest site is not disturbed, the buffer is maintained and the success or failure of the nest is documented. • If UC Merced elects to remove a nest tree, nest trees may only be removed after the qualified avian biologist has determined that the nests are unoccupied.
• If an active nest is causing a safety hazard, CDFW shall be contacted to determine if the nest can be removed.
(b) Minimize impacts to burrowing owl and compensate for habitat loss.
CDFW (2012) recommends that take-avoidance (preconstruction) surveys be conducted to locate active burrowing owl burrows in the construction work area and within an approximately 500 -foot buffer zone around the construction area. a qualified avian biologist shall conduct take avoidance surveys for active burrows according to the CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 Staff Report). Surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to initiating ground disturbance activities and surveillance surveys should be conducted as frequently as recommended in the 2012 Staff Report. If ground- disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for than 30 days after the take avoidance survey, the area shall be resurveyed. If no burrowing owls are detected, no further mitigation is required.
If active burrowing owls are detected, the following additional measures are required:
• Project implementation shall seasonally and spatially avoid negative impacts and disturbances that could result in the take of burrowing owls, nest or eggs.
• If burrowing owls and their habitat can be protected in place or adjacent to a construction site, buffer zones, visual screens or other measures shall be used to minimize disturb-ance impacts while project activities are occurring. To use these minimization measures, a qualified avian biologist shall determine the exact measures following the guidance described in the 2012 Staff Report. • If owls must be moved away from the project site during the nonbreeding season, passive relocation techniques (e.g., installing one- way doors at burrow entrances) shall be used instead of trapping, as described in CDFW guidelines. At least 1 week will be necessary to complete passive relocation and allow owls to acclimate to alternate burrows.
• When destruction of occupied burrows is unavoidable during the nonbreeding season (September 1 to January 31), unsuitable burrows shall be enhanced (enlarged or cleared of debris) or new burrows created (by installing artificial burrows) at a ratio of 2:1 on protected lands approved by the CDFW. Newly created burrows shall follow guidelines established by the CDFW.
LRDP MM BIO-9b: New buildings and structures proposed under the 2020 LRDP shall incorporate bird- safe design practices (for example, American Bird Conservancy’s Bird-Friendly Building Design [2015] or San Francisco Planning Department’s Standards for Bird-Safe Buildings [2011]). The UC Merced Physical and Environmental Planning Department shall review the final designs of the buildings and structures to determine that appropriate bird safety designs have been effectively incorporated to reduce potential impacts to birds. The following design strategies shall be considered in the design of buildings and structures:
Appendix A Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
A-4 UC Merced Annexation Project
• Create building facades with “visual noise” via cladding or other design features that make it easier for birds to identify buildings and not mistake windows for open sky or trees. • Incorporate windows that are not clear or reflective into the building or structure designs. • Use windows that incorporate glass types such as UV-A or fritted glass and windows that incorporate UV- absorbing and UV-reflecting stripe.
• Use grid patterns on windows in locations with the highest potential for bird -window collisions (e.g., windows at the anticipated height of adjacent vegetation at maturity). • Reduce the proportion of glass to other building materials in new construction. • Avoid placement of bird-friendly attractants (i.e. vegetated roofs, water features, tall trees) near glass whenever possible.
• Install motion-sensitive lighting in any area visible from the exterior that automatically turn lights off during after-work hours.
LRDP MM GHG-1a: UC Merced shall set a goal to reduce or control the increase in its GHG emissions such that the total emissions do not exceed 3,300 MTCO2e/year by the end of the year 2030.
UC Merced shall monitor GHG emissions each year, monitor upcoming projects for their potential to increase the campus’ GHG emissions, and implement project-specific and campus-wide GHG reduction measures to reduce the campus’ GHG emissions in accordance with the 3,300 MTCO2e/year goal for 2030.
In the event that adequate reduction is not achieved by these measures, UC Merced shall purchase renewable energy credits, or other verifiable GHG offsets to keep the net emissions at or below 3,300 MTCO2e/year.
LRDP MM GHG-1b: UC Merced shall implement LRDP Mitigation Measures AQ-2a and -2b.
LRDP MM GHG-1c: UC Merced shall periodically review new technologies that can be implemented to further reduce the campus’ GHG emissions.
Cumulative MM C-HYD-2: UC Merced shall work with the regional water agencies, including the City of Merced and MID, to develop programs to expand conjunctive use capabilities, increase recharge, and reduce groundwater demand.
LRDP MM NOI-3: Prior to initiation of construction on a project that is within 500 feet of off-site residential receptors, UC Merced shall develop and implement a construction noise mitigation program for that project that includes but is not limited to the following:
• Construction activities within 500 feet of any residences shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays with no construction on Sundays and holidays. • All noise-producing project equipment and vehicles using internal combustion engines shall be equipped where appropriate with exhaust mufflers and air-inlet silencers in good operating condition that meet or exceed original factory specifications.
• Mobile or fixed “package” equipment (e.g., arc-welders, air compressors) shall be equipped with shrouds and noise control features that are readily available for that type of equipment. • All mobile or fixed noise-producing equipment used on the project that is regulated for noise output by local, state or federal agency shall comply with such regulation while engaged in project-related activities. • Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal combustion powered equipment, where practicable.
• Material stockpiles, mobile equipment staging, construction vehicle parking, and maintenance areas shall be located as far as practicable from noise-sensitive land uses.
• Stationary noise sources such as generators or pumps shall be located away from noise -sensitive land uses as feasible.
Ascent Environmental Appendix A
City of Merced
UC Merced Annexation Project 5
• The use of noise-producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. No project-related public address loudspeaker, two-way radio, or music systems shall be audible at any adjacent noise-sensitive receptor except for emergency use. • The erection of temporary noise barriers shall be considered where project activity is unavoidably close to noise-sensitive receptors.
• The noisiest construction operations shall be scheduled to occur together to avoid continuing periods of the greatest annoyance, wherever possible.
• Construction vehicle trips shall be routed as far as practical from existing res idential uses. • The loudest campus construction activities, such as demolition, blasting, and pile driving, shall be scheduled during summer, Thanksgiving, winter, and spring breaks when fewer people would be disturbed by construction noise.
• Whenever possible, academic, administrative, and residential areas that will be subject to construction noise shall be informed a week before the start of each construction project.
LRDP MM NOI-4a: UC Merced shall avoid impact pile driving where possible in vibration-sensitive areas. Drilled piles or the use of vibratory pile driving will be used where geological conditions permit their use. For impact pile driving activities occurring within 50 feet of typical structures, limit groundborne vibration due to construction activities to 0.50 inch/second, ppv (limit of potential for damage to typical structures) in the vertical direction at sensitive receptors. Since in many cases the information available during the preliminary engineering phase would not be sufficient to define specific vibration mitigation measures, UC Merced shall describe and commit to a mitigation plan to minimize construction vibration damage using all feasible means available.
LRDP MM NOI-4b: For construction adjacent to highly sensitive uses such as laboratories, UC Merced shall apply additional measures as feasible, including advance notice to occupants of sensitive facilities to ensure that precautions are taken in those facilities to protect ongoing activities from vibration effects.
LRDP MM PUB-6a: UC Merced shall work with the County to avoid physical deterioration of existing facilities at Lake Yosemite Regional Park, and/or improve park facilities within the existing park site as necessitated by the increased uses associated with development of the campus.
LRDP MM PUB-6b: UC Merced will pay its fair share of the cost of necessary improvements to the regional park. UC Merced’s share of funding will be based on the percentage that on-campus residential population represents of the total population in eastern Merced County at the time that an improvement is implemented.
LRDP MM PUB-6c: In recognition of the sensitive resources present on lands immediately adjacent to the region al park, all regional park improvement projects that are implemented by the County within 250 feet of the park’s eastern boundary pursuant to LRDP Mitigation Measures PUB-6a and PUB-6b above, will implement mitigation measures to avoid and minimize indirect effects on biological resources.
LRDP MM TRANS-1: Campus Traffic Mitigation Program (CTMP). The Campus Traffic Mitigation Program is a program to monitor trip generation, reduce peak-hour trips, and participate in roadway improvements to mitigate impacts at off-campus intersections, and adjacent roadway segments in the case of Lake Road, determined to be affected by the development of the campus under the 2020 LRDP. CEQA provides that an agency can mitigate its contribution to local and regional environmental impacts by contributing its proportional share of funding to mitigation measures designed to alleviate the identified impact (CEQA Guidelines §15130(a)(3)).
The CTMP will consist of the following elements/measures:
Measure TRANS-1a: Travel Demand Management. To reduce on- and off-campus vehicle trips and resulting impacts, the University will continue to implement and expand a range of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies. TDM strategies will include measures to encourage transit and shuttle use and alternative transportation modes including bicycle transportation, implement parking polices that reduce Appendix A Ascent Environmental
City of Merced
A-6 UC Merced Annexation Project
demand, and implement other mechanisms that reduce vehicle trips to and from the campus. The University shall monitor the performance of campus TDM strategies through annual surveys.
Measure TRANS-1b: Transit Enhancement. To enhance transit systems serving the campus, the University will work cooperatively with the City of Merced, County of Merced, CatTracks, The Bus, StaRT, YARTS, and oth er local agencies to coordinate service routes with existing and proposed shuttle and transit programs.
Measure TRANS-1c: Sustainability and Monitoring. The University will review individual projects proposed under the 2020 LRDP for consistency with UC Sustainable Practices Policy and UC Merced TDM strategies set forth in the 2020 LRDP to ensure that bicycle and pedestrian improvements, alternative fuel infrastructure, transit stops, and other project features that promote alternative transportation are in corporated in the project.
Measure TRANS-1d: Campus Traffic Impact Monitoring. The University will monitor trip generation resulting from the campus development under the 2020 LRDP to track the actual trip generation relative to the projections in this SEIR. The University will conduct traffic cordon counts of the campus with each 2,000 - person increase in student population, measured by three-term average headcount enrollment increases with 2019 – 2020 as the base academic year. If this monitoring determines that traffic attributable to the campus contributes to a significant traffic impact at any of the intersections listed in Table 4.8 -9, the University will implement measures to reduce vehicle trips contributing to the impact or provide its proportional share of funding for improvements at the impacted intersections presented in Table 4.8 -9.
Measure TRANS-1e: Proportional Share Determination. At the time a significant impact is identified pursuant to the monitoring under Measure TRANS-1d, the University’s actual percent contribution to the total traffic volume at pertinent intersections and roadway segments will be calculated and used as the basis for determining the University’s mitigation obligation, or proportional share of funding for the traffic improvements listed in the table.
Measure TRANS-1f: Mitigation Payments. The amount of the University’s mitigation funding will be based on the University’s proportional share of the affected jurisdiction’s actual cost of the relevant traffic improve - ment(s) at the time of final bid/contract documents. The amount will be calculated by applying the University’s proportional share determined in Measure TRANS-1e to the total cost of the improvement.
Funding will be internally committed by the University at the time the traffic impact is triggered pursuant to the results of monitoring under Measure TRANS-1d. Payments will be made to the appropriate jurisdiction at the time a Notice to Proceed with the construction of the improve-ments is issued. If improvements are constructed before the impact is triggered, the University will pay its proportional share at the time that the impact is triggered, based on the University’s monitoring under Measure TRANS- 1d. Mitigation payments will be made only after the University has been provided the opportunity to review the scope and budget of the improvement project. As Intersection #3, Lake/Bellevue Road intersection, directly serves the campus, the University will be responsible for the entire cost of improvements at this inter section.
Cumulative MM C-TRANS-1: The University will implement LRDP MM TRANS-1 to reduce vehicle trips, monitor traffic growth, and make fair share contributions to address the project’s contribution to cumulative impacts under 2035 conditions.
Certain improvements in Table 4.8-12 are the same as, or similar to, improvements identified in Table 4.8-9 for the 2030 with LRDP Project scenario; therefore, as and when fair share is calculated for these intersection improvements, the calculation shall take into account the redundant improvements.
As Intersections #3, #18 and #19 would directly serve the campus, the University will be responsible for the entire cost of improvements at these three intersections.
Appendix B
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, UC Merced 2009 Long Range
Development Plan
MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that a Lead Agency establish a program to monitor and report on mitigation measures adopted as part of the environmental review process to avoid or reduce the severity and magnitude of potentially significant environmental impacts associated with project implementation. CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 (a) (1)) requires that a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) be adopted at the time that the agency determines to carry out a project for which an EIR has been prepared, to ensure that mitigation measures identified in the EIR are fully implemented.
As discussed in the Draft EIS/EIR, the UC Merced and University Community Project encompasses the development of the UC Merced Campus and the University Community and the impacts of this project are evaluated in Volumes 1 and 2 of the Draft EIS/EIR. The MMRP for the UC Merced 2009 Long Range Development Plan is presented in Table 1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, UC Merced 2009 Long Range Development Plan, which includes the full text of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIS/EIR. In addition, Volume 3 of the Draft EIS/EIR evaluates the potential environmental impacts from the development of the next phase of campus development (UCM 2020 Project). The MMRP for the UCM 2020 Project is presented in Table 2, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, UCM 2020 Project, which include the full text of project‐specific mitigation measures identified in the Final EIS/EIR for that project. Each MMRP describes implementation and monitoring procedures, responsibilities, and timing for each mitigation measure identified in the Draft EIS/EIR, including:
Significant Impact: Identifies the Impact Number and statement from the Final EIS/EIR.
Mitigation Measure: Provides full text of the mitigation measure as provided in the Final EIS/EIR.
Monitoring/Reporting Action(s): Designates responsibility for implementation of the mitigation measure and when appropriate, summarizes the steps to be taken to implement the measure.
Mitigation Timing: Identifies the stage of the project during which the mitigation action will be taken.
Monitoring Schedule: Specifies procedures for documenting and reporting the implementation of the mitigation measure.
UC Merced may modify the means by which a mitigation measure will be implemented, as long as the alternative means ensure compliance during project implementation. The responsibilities of mitigation implementation, monitoring and reporting extend to several UC Merced departments and offices. The manager or department lead of the identified unit or department will be directly responsible for ensuring Impact Sciences, Inc. 1 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Impact Sciences, Inc. 2 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
the responsible party complies with the mitigation. The Physical Planning, Design and Construction Department (PPD&C) is responsible for the overall administration of the program and for assisting relevant departments and project managers in their oversight and reporting responsibilities. The PPD&C is also responsible for ensuring the relevant parties understand their charge and complete the required procedures accurately and on schedule.
Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
UC Merced Long Range Development Plan
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and
Action(s)
Mitigation
Timing
Monitoring
Schedule
AESTHETICS
MM AES‐1a: The University will plant tall trees along the campus’ western boundary to screen views of the campus facilities from Lake Yosemite Regional Park.
PPD&C
Review final landscape
plans of projects along the
western boundary of the
Campus. Revise design, if
necessary, to screen views
to the extent feasible.
Project design
and
construction.
Prior to
construction.
Alt 1 – Impact AES‐1:
The Proposed Action
would result in a
substantial adverse
effect on scenic vistas.
MM AES‐1b: Where possible, major vehicular and pedestrian transportation corridors on the Campus shall be located and designed to provide views of the Sierra Nevada.
PPD&C
Review final circulation
plans in the 2009 LRDP.
Revise design, if
necessary, to provide the
scenic view to the extent
feasible.
Project design
and
construction.
Prior to
construction.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 3 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule AESTHETICS (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact AES‐3:
The Proposed Action
would substantially
adversely alter the
visual quality and
character of the site and
its surroundings.
MM AES‐3a: The University shall design all new aboveground infrastructure on the Campus to the following standards: (a) Screen aboveground infrastructure from view from public rights‐of‐way or scenic vistas, via landscaping, fencing, or other architectural screening; (b) Require creative design measures to camouflage structures by integrating them with existing buildings and among other existing uses; (c) Locate aboveground infrastructure on sites that are not visible from visually sensitive areas, such as residential communities and open space areas; (d) Require providers to co‐locate their structure on a single site, where technically feasible and visually desirable; and (e) Locate antennae and equipment on other existing community facility sites, such as water tanks or utility poles.
PPD&C
Review of engineering
plan for aboveground
utility lines.
Review project design for
compatibility. Revise
design, if necessary, to
ensure compatibility.
Project design
and
construction.
Prior to
construction.
AIR QUALITY
Alt 1 – Impact AQ‐1:
The Proposed Action
would result in
construction emissions
that would violate an
air quality standard or
contribute substantially
to an existing or
projected air quality
violation.
MM AQ‐1a: The Campus and the developers within the University Community shall include in all construction contracts the measures specified in SJVAPCD Regulation VIII (as it may be amended for application to all construction projects generally) to reduce fugitive dust impacts, including but not limited to the following:
• All disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively utilized for construction purpose, shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water, chemical
stabilizer/suppressant, or vegetative ground cover.
• All on‐site unpaved roads and off‐site unpaved access roads shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.
• All land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land leveling, grading, cut and fill, and demolition activities shall be effectively controlled of fugitive dust emissions using application of water or by presoaking.
PPD&C
Continue to require
standard dust control
measures as part of every
construction project
contract.
Prior to
construction.
Confirm and
document prior
to construction
of project.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 4 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule AIR QUALITY (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact AQ‐1
(continued)
• When materials are transported off‐site, all material shall be covered, effectively wetted to limit visible dust emissions, or at least 6 inches of freeboard space from the top of the container shall be maintained. • All operations shall limit or expeditiously remove the accumulation of mud or dirt from adjacent public streets at least once every 24 hours when operations are occurring. (The use of dry rotary brushes is expressly prohibited except where preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit visible dust emissions. Use of blower devices is expressly forbidden.)
Following the addition of materials to, or the removal of materials from, the surface of outdoor storage piles, storage piles shall be effectively stabilized of fugitive dust emissions by using sufficient water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.
PPD&C
Inspect construction site at
regular intervals during
construction to verify
compliance with specified
dust control measures.
During
construction.
Confirm and
document at
regular
intervals
throughout
construction
period.
PPD&C
Continue to require
contract specifications for
dust and erosion control
measures as part of every
construction project
contract.
Prior to
construction.
Confirm and
document prior
to construction
of project.
MM AQ‐1b: The Campus and the developers within the University Community shall include in construction contracts for large construction projects near sensitive receptors the following control measures characterized by the SJVAPCD as enhanced and optional control measures:
• Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph.
• Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways from sites with a slope greater than 1 percent.
• To the extent feasible, limit area subject to excavation, grading, and other construction activity at any one time.
PPD&C
Inspect construction site at
regular intervals during
construction to verify
compliance with specified
dust and erosion control
measures.
During
construction.
Confirm and
document at
regular
intervals
throughout
construction
period.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 5 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule AIR QUALITY (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact AQ‐1
(continued)
MM AQ‐1c: The Campus and the developers within the University Community shall implement the following mitigation measures to reduce impacts of ROG and NOX emissions from construction equipment exhaust:
• When feasible, use construction equipment operated by alternative fuel.
• Minimize idling time to a maximum of 10 minutes when construction equipment is not in use.
• To the extent practicable, manage operation of heavy‐duty equipment to reduce emissions.
• Employ construction‐activity management techniques such as extending the construction period outside the ozone season of May through October.
• Use low‐emission on‐site stationary equipment.
PPD&C
Adopt standard
specifications that include
the specified measures to
reduce emissions of ROG
and NOX from
construction equipment
exhaust as part of every
construction project
contract.
Prior to
construction.
Confirm and
document prior
to construction
of project.
PPD&C
Evaluate feasibility of
repowering or retrofitting
construction equipment to
meet the stricter of US
EPA or CARB off‐road
diesel engines standards,
as described.
Prior to
construction.
Confirm and
document prior
to construction
of project.
MM AQ‐1d: Prior to use in construction, the Campus and the developers within the University Community will evaluate the feasibility of repowering or retrofitting the large off‐road construction equipment that will be operating for substantial periods. Engine replacements will be required to meet the stricter of US EPA or CARB off‐road diesel engines standards. Retrofit technologies such as particulate traps, selective catalytic reduction, oxidation catalysts, air enhancement technologies, etc., will be evaluated. Retrofitting will be required if they are certified by CARB and/or the US EPA, and are commercially available and can feasibly be retrofitted onto construction equipment. Retrofit technologies certified to the highest level (e.g., CARB Level 3) shall be evaluated first before lower level technologies are evaluated.
PPD&C
Ensure retrofitting
technologies are
implemented in
equipment, prior to
agreement of construction
contract.
Prior to
construction.
Confirm and
document prior
to construction
of project.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 6 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule AIR QUALITY (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact AQ‐2:
The Proposed Action
would result in
operational emissions
that would violate an
air quality standard or
contribute substantially
to an existing or
projected air quality
violation.
MM AQ‐2a: The Campus will work with the SJVAPCD to ensure that emissions directly and indirectly associated with the Campus, University Community, and induced growth are adequately accounted for and mitigated in applicable air quality planning efforts. The SJVUAPCD can and should adopt adequate measures consistent with applicable law to ensure that air quality standard violations are avoided.
PPD&C
Monitor changes in air
quality regulations.
Attend SJVAPCD
meetings on changing
regulations. Meet with
SJVAPCD to discuss air
quality planning efforts.
Document meeting
results.
During
operation.
As changes in
standards and
procedures
occur.
MM AQ‐2b: The Campus and the developers within the University Community shall implement the following measures to reduce emissions from vehicles:
• Provide pedestrian‐enhancing infrastructure to encourage pedestrian activity and discourage vehicle use.
• Provide bicycle facilities to encourage bicycle use instead of driving. • Provide transit‐enhancing infrastructure to promote the use of public transportation.
• Provide facilities to accommodate alternative‐fuel vehicles such as electric cars and CNG vehicles.
PPD&C
Ensure that facilities listed
are included in project
design as applicable:
verify construction of
pedestrian‐enhancing
infrastructure, bicycle
facilities, transit‐
enhancing infrastructure,
facilities to accommodate
alternative‐fuel vehicles.
During detailed
project planning
or project
design prior to
project.
Prior to
approval of
final design of
applicable
projects.
• Improve traffic flows and congestion by timing of traffic signals to facilitate uninterrupted travel.
Facilities Department
Monitor traffic at affected
intersections and adjust
timing of traffic signals as
appropriate to facilitate
uninterrupted travel.
During
operation.
At least yearly.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 7 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule AIR QUALITY (continued)
PPD&C
Adopt standard
specifications or design
guidelines that include
area source reduction
measures to be required
for construction projects.
Ensure that where feasible
applicable measures are
included in each project.
During
operation.
At least yearly. Alt 1 – Impact AQ‐2
(continued)
MM AQ‐2c: The Campus and the developers within the University Community shall implement the following measures to reduce emissions from area sources, as feasible:
• Use solar or low‐emission water heaters.
• Orient buildings to take advantage of solar heating and natural cooling and use passive solar designs.
• Increase wall and attic insulation.
• EPA certified wood‐burning appliances, or residential natural‐gas fireplaces.
• Provide electric equipment for landscape maintenance. Purchasing Department Develop policy that
requires that where
feasible new landscape
equipment purchased is
electric.
During
operation.
At least yearly.
Alt 1 – Impact AQ‐4:
The Proposed Action
would result in a
cumulatively
considerable net
increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the
project region is
nonattainment under an
applicable federal or
state ambient air quality
standard (including
releasing emissions
which exceed
quantitative thresholds
for ozone precursors).
Mitigation Measures AQ‐1 and AQ‐2 would apply to this impact. No further mitigation is available.
See monitoring and
reporting for Mitigation
Measures AQ‐1 and AQ‐2
above.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 8 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Alt 1 – Impact BIO‐2:
The Proposed Action
would result in adverse
impacts on special‐
status plant species.
MM BIO‐2: Mitigate for loss of special‐status plants and habitat through additional off‐site compensation.
Prior to any ground disturbance on lands to the north and east of Le Grand Canal (i.e., land adjacent to CNR) a restoration ecologist, retained by the University, shall prepare a feasibility analysis regarding the potential to transplant seeds from succulent owl’s‐clover, shining navarretia, and dwarf downingia plants. This feasibility analysis will address potential sites suitable and available for transplantation as well as availability of suitable plant material, and costs associated with this method of mitigation. If it is determined to be feasible, to further minimize impacts to these special status plants, the University shall transplant seeds from succulent owl’s‐clover, shining navarretia, and dwarf downingia plants, seeds from all three species will be collected and translocated to suitable habitat within the CNR. Translocating the stands to the CNR would minimize any potential genetic contamination, because the affected stands are part of the occurrences present within the CNR and, presumably, part of the same populations. The University will retain a qualified restoration ecologist to work closely with resource agency specialists (USFWS and CDFG staff) and knowledgeable individuals to locate and determine the suitability of translocation sites within the CNR. Translocation of the stands that would be affected by the Proposed Action would involve (1) identifying suitable transplant sites, (2) moving the plant material to the transplant sites, and (3) monitoring the transplant sites to document recruitment and survival rates. The restoration ecologist will develop a detailed transplantation and monitoring plan that provides detailed information on:
• coordination efforts with agencies and knowledgeable individuals, • methods for collecting seeds from the affected populations, • seed storage methods,
• planting plan and specifications (including planting locations and densities),
PPD&C
Retain the services of a
qualified restoration
ecologist to work with
resource agency
specialists, determine
suitability of translocation
sites, and develop
transplantation
monitoring plan as
described.
Prior to project
construction
that would
result in
impacts on
succulent owl’s‐
clover, shining
navarretia, and
dwarf
downingia
plants.
Document upon
completion.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 9 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (continued)
• measurable success criteria that can be achieved within a 10‐year period, monitoring and reporting methods and schedule,
• funding source and responsible party, and
• adaptive management measures to ensure that the desired success criteria are achieved.
.
The University will submit draft copies of the transplantation and monitoring plan to the appropriate resource agencies (e.g., USFWS and CDFG) for review and comment. The plan will be approved by the appropriate agencies before it is implemented. As part of the plan, the following general steps would be involved in the translocation and monitoring efforts, as appropriate:
• A site analysis will be conducted to document the biotic and physical requirements of succulent owl’s‐clover, shining navarretia, and dwarf downingia within the project site. This task will include an evaluation of the populations. Information on soil type, plant species associations, aspect, vegetation cover, and level of disturbance will be gathered during this evaluation.
• Sites that may be suitable for transplanting the seeds will be identified and evaluated. Suitable sites may not contain existing stands of species being translocated. The same information as identified above will be gathered for the translocation sites.
Seeds will be collected for propagation or storage purposes. Seed collection, storage, and propagation will be done by a qualified restoration ecologist. The seeds will be planted at the transplant sites at the appropriate time to ensure higher survival rates.
PPD&C/Restoration
Ecologist
Submit transplantation
monitoring plan to
appropriate resource
agencies. Verify that the
plan is approved prior to
implementation.
Prior to
construction
Secure approval
of plan by
appropriate
agencies prior
to construction.
Prepare a memo
to document
that plan is
approved.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 10 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact BIO‐2
(continued)
• Topsoil containing seeds will not be used for transplantation into existing vernal pool habitat because of the potential for coincidentally translocating the seeds or cysts of other plant and animal species.
However, soil may be translocated to newly created habitat or may be harvested for establishing a population under culture. Dried plants and topsoil will be excavated only from the areas containing the affected plants and not from pools within conservation areas. The seed material will be excavated after the plants have set seed and dried (generally by late summer). The excavation will be done using hand tools. A post‐translocation report that documents the measures used to relocate the populations and where they were relocated will be prepared.
• Translocated populations will be monitored to document survival and recruitment rates over a period of time established in consultation with the resource agencies but for a minimum of five years. The populations would be monitored annually during the flowering period to document success rates and to identify remedial actions. The detailed transplant and monitoring plan will provide specific monitoring protocol and documentation procedures. A copy of the annual monitoring reports and the final monitoring report will be provided to the appropriate resource agencies for review.
PPD&C
Verify implementation of
monitoring efforts as
identified in the approved
plan.
Prior to start of
construction.
Monitor
translocated
populations and
prepare
monitoring
reports
annually.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 11 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (continued)
MM BIO‐9: Avoid and minimize impacts on special‐status and non‐ special‐status migratory birds, and raptors.
(a) Limit construction to the non‐breeding season or, if breeding season work is required, conduct pre‐construction (tree, shrub, and ground) nest surveys to identify and avoid active nests or as an option, remove potential breeding habitat during the non‐breeding season.
• If feasible, the applicant shall conduct all construction‐related activities including (but not limited to) tree and shrub removal, other vegetation clearing, grading, or other ground disturbing activities during the non‐breeding season (between August 16 and February 14) for special‐status and non‐special‐status migratory birds and raptors.
If construction activities are scheduled to occur during the breeding season, a qualified avian biologist, with knowledge of the species to be surveyed, shall be retained to conduct focused nesting surveys within 15 days of the start of ground‐disturbing or construction activities and within the appropriate habitat.
PPD&C
Retain a qualified biologist
to conduct surveys and to
develop a plan to avoid
active nest sites during
construction, or as an
option, remove potential
breeding habitat during
non‐breeding season.
Verify survey was
conducted and document
results. Include mitigation
specifications in
construction contract as
necessary.
During the
breeding season
prior to start of
construction or
of each
construction
phase.
Prior to
construction.
Alt 1 – Impact BIO‐9:
The Proposed Action
would result in
potentially significant
adverse impacts on
nesting special‐status
bird species and non‐
special‐status migratory
birds and raptors.
• Specifically, tree, shrub, and ground nesting surveys for special‐status birds (including but not limited to white‐tailed kite, Swainson’s hawk, northern harrier, burrowing owl, loggerhead shrike, and tricolored blackbird), and other migratory birds and raptors shall be conducted before any construction disturbances occur in or near suitable nesting habitat within 500 feet (0.25 mile for Swainson’s hawk) of the construction work area between February 15 and August 15. • If an active nest is located on or within 500 feet (0.25 mile for Swainson’s hawk) of the project area, CDFG shall be consulted to determine an appropriate no‐disturbance buffer around the nest until the nest is no longer active and the young have fledged. No construction shall be allowed within this exclusion area without consulting with CDFG. A wildlife biologist shall monitor the nest site during construction at least once a week, or at a frequency determined by CDFG, to ensure that the nest site is not disturbed and the buffer is maintained.
PPD&C
Develop and implement a
plan to avoid active nest
sites during construction,
establish buffer zone, and
monitor active nests.
Verify that plan is
implemented.
Develop plan
prior to
construction
Monitor prior
and during
construction
activities.
Prior to and
during
construction
activities.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 12 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact BIO‐9
(continued)
• If the project proponent elects to remove a nest tree, nest trees may only be removed between August 16 and February 28, after the qualified avian biologist has determined that the nests are unoccupied. (b) Minimize impacts to burrowing owl and compensate for habitat loss.
The CDFG (1995) recommends that preconstruction surveys be conducted to locate active burrowing owl burrows in the construction work area and within a 500‐foot‐wide buffer zone around the construction area. The project proponent or its contractor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys for active burrows according to the CDFG’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game 1995). The preconstruction surveys shall include a breeding season survey and a wintering season survey. If no burrowing owls are detected, no further mitigation is required.
If active burrowing owls are detected, the following additional measures are required:
• Occupied burrows shall not be disturbed during the breeding season (February 1 to August 31), which requires a 250 foot no disturbance buffer.
• If owls must be moved away from the project site during the nonbreeding season, passive relocation techniques (e.g., installing one‐ way doors at burrow entrances) shall be used instead of trapping, as described in CDFG guidelines. At least 1 week will be necessary to complete passive relocation and allow owls to acclimate to alternate burrows.
• When destruction of occupied burrows is unavoidable during the nonbreeding season (September 1 to January 31), unsuitable burrows shall be enhanced (enlarged or cleared of debris) or new burrows created (by installing artificial burrows) at a ratio of 2:1 on protected lands approved by the CDFG. Newly created burrows shall follow guidelines established by the CDFG (1995). These guidelines also require compensation for loss of foraging habitat described in detail under Impact BIO‐8 above.
PPD&C
Retain a qualified biologist
to conduct
preconstruction surveys
for active burrows
according to the CDFG’s
Staff Report on Burrowing
Owl Mitigation. If
burrowing owls detected,
verify that mitigation
measures are followed.
Document in a memo.
Develop plan
prior to
construction
Monitor prior
and during
construction
activities.
Confirm and
document in
project file
during project
final design and
construction.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 13 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule CULTURAL RESOURCES
Alt 1 – Impact CUL‐1:
Implementation of the
Proposed Action could
damage or destroy
significant historic
resources located within
the project footprint.
MM CUL‐1b: Prior to the development of the Campus and Community North, the University shall ensure that the two previously evaluated historic irrigation canals, Fairfield Canal and the Le Grand Canal, the farm complex, the fence line and prehistoric site MCN‐1 which were recommended to be found ineligible for listing under the NRHP and CRHR, are be formally evaluated. Formal NRHP and CRHR evaluations of these resources will be reviewed by the SHPO for concurrence. If SHPO does not concur with the findings of these previous evaluations, the development of any necessary treatment measures will be stipulated in a Historic Properties Treatment Plan as requirements of the PA executed for this project. Identified treatment measures will be implemented prior to any direct effects to the canals as required by the PA.
PPD&C
Retain a qualified
historian to conduct a
formal evaluation of the
irrigation canals, Fairfield
Canal and the Le Grand
Canal, the farm complex,
the fence line and
prehistoric site MCN‐1.
SHPO to determine if the
sites are eligible for the
NRHP and CRHR. If
eligible, prepare Historic
Properties Treatment
Plan. Document
preparation and
implementation of the
plan in memo.
Prior to
development of
Campus and
Community
North; during
site selection or
project design.
Prior to
development on
the two
previously
evaluated
historic
irrigation
canals, Fairfield
Canal and the
Le Grand Canal,
the farm
complex, the
fence line and
prehistoric site
MCN‐1.
PPD&C
Inform contractor about
need to watch for buried
cultural resources
resources.
During
preparation of
construction
contract.
Document in
project file at
the start of
construction.
Alt 1 – Impact CUL‐2:
Implementation of the
Proposed Action could
cause damage to
unidentified or buried
cultural resources.
MM CUL‐2: If buried cultural resources, such as chipped or ground stone, historic debris, building foundations, or non‐human bone are inadvertently discovered during ground‐disturbing activities on the campus, work will stop in that area and within 100 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance of the find and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures. Treatment measures typically include development of avoidance strategies or mitigation of impacts through data recovery programs such as excavation or detailed documentation.
If cultural resources are discovered during construction activities, the construction contractor and lead contractor compliance inspector will verify that work is halted until appropriate treatment measures are implemented in coordination with the USACE and UC Merced.
If resources are
discovered, halt work and
implement appropriate
treatment measures.
During
construction, in
the event of a
discovery.
Document in
project file upon
implementation
of required
measures.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 14 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule CULTURAL RESOURCES (continued)
PPD&C
Document measures taken
to preserve human
remains discovered on
campus in place.
During
construction.
Confirm and
document in
project file
during planning
and
construction.
PPD&C
Retain Native American
representative to monitor
archaeological excavation.
During
planning, and
upon discovery
of human
remains in an
archaeological
context.
Confirm and
document in
project file.
Alt 1 – Impact CUL‐3:
Implementation of the
Proposed Action could
cause damage to
previously unidentified
human remains.
MM CUL‐3: If human remains of Native American origin are discovered during ground‐disturbing activities, the Campus and/or developer will comply with state laws relating to the disposition of Native American burials, which falls within the jurisdiction of the California Native American Heritage Commission (Public Resources Code Section 5097). If human remains are discovered or recognized in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until
• the coroner of Merced County has been informed and has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required; and • if the remains are of Native American origin;
• the descendants from the deceased Native Americans have made a recommendation to the land owner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98; or • the California Native American Heritage Commission was unable to identify a descendant or the descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being notified by the Commission.
PPD&C
Contact archaeologist and
County Coroner in the
event of discovery of
suspected human bone.
Upon discovery
of suspected
human bone.
Confirm and
document in
project file.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 15 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule CULTURAL RESOURCES (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact CUL‐4:
Development of the
Proposed Action would
have the potential to
disturb or destroy
paleontological
resources.
MM CUL‐4a: Prior to project construction, construction personnel will be informed of the potential for encountering significant paleontological resources. All construction personnel will be informed of the need to stop work in the vicinity of a potential discovery until a qualified paleontologist has been provided the opportunity to assess the significance of the find and implement appropriate measures to protect or scientifically remove the find. Construction personnel will also be informed of the requirements that unauthorized collection resources are prohibited.
PPD&C
For projects in previously
undisturbed lands, inform
contractor about need to
watch for paleontological
resources.
During
preparation of
construction
contract.
Document in
project file at
the start of
construction.
PPD&C
Retain qualified
paleontologist to perform
work as specified.
During
construction, in
the event of a
discovery.
Document in
project file upon
completion of
recordation and
recovery.
MM CUL‐4b: A qualified paleontologist will be intermittently present to inspect exposures of Merhten Formation, North Merced Gravels, and Riverbank Formation during construction operations to ensure that paleontological resources are not destroyed by project construction.
PPD&C
Retain qualified
paleontologist to perform
work as specified.
Prior to start of
excavation and
during
construction.
Complete upon
documentation
of compliance
with
appropriate
measures.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Alt 1 – Impact GEO‐2:
The Proposed Action
could expose people or
structures to increased
risk of structural
damage and injury from
ground shaking and
related hazards.
MM GEO‐2: During project‐specific building design, a site‐specific geotechnical investigation shall be performed by a Certified Engineering Geologist or Licensed Geotechnical Engineer to assess detailed seismic, geologic, and soil conditions at each construction site. The study shall include an evaluation of liquefaction potential, slope stability, landslide potential, expansive and compressible soils, and other structural characteristics and shall identify specific geotechnical recommendations designed to mitigate for the site hazards. The geotechnical recommendations will be followed.
PPD&C
Retain Certified
Engineering Geologist or
Licensed Geotechnical
Engineer to conduct site‐
specific geotechnical
investigation. Document
implementation of
geotechnical
recommendations in a
memo.
During project
design, prior to
start of
excavation, and
during
construction.
Complete upon
construction in
compliance
with
geotechnical
report.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 16 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND PUBLIC SAFETY
PPD&C
Inform contractor about
need to watch for
hazardous materials.
During
preparation of
construction
contract.
Document in
project file at
the start of
construction.
Alt 1 – Impact HAZ‐4:
The Proposed Action
could be located on a
site that contains
hazardous materials
and, could create a
significant hazard to the
public or the
environment.
MM HAZ‐4: In the event that non‐permitted disposal sites, trash burn pits, wells, underground storage devices, or unknown hazardous materials are encountered during construction on the campus site, construction activities would cease until all contaminated areas are identified, and remediated or removed. This process of identification and remediation or removal would be coordinated with the Merced County Division of Environmental Health. PPD&C Coordinate with Merced
County Division of
Environmental Health as
required.
During
construction, in
the event of an
encounter.
Document in
project file
upon.
completion of
remediation or
removal.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 17 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule NOISE
Alt 1– Impact NOI‐1:
Implementation of the
Proposed Action would
result in increased
vehicular traffic on the
regional road network,
which would increase
ambient traffic noise
levels at existing off‐site
noise‐sensitive uses.
MM NOI‐1: For existing sensitive receptors that are predicted to be exposed to traffic noise increases that exceed the noise significance thresholds, project proponents shall commission a study, conducted by a qualified acoustical professional, to define reasonable and feasible noise mitigation, and shall implement the recommendations. Mitigation measures would include the following:
• Re‐pave the streets with ’quiet’ pavement types such as a porous Open‐Grade Asphalt Concrete with fine aggregate size to reduce exterior noise levels to meet the noise thresholds (60 dBA Ldn for residences, schools, and libraries, and 70 dBA Ldn for parks). The effectiveness of this measure would depend on the existing pavement conditions along the roadway segment. Noise reductions of 3 to 4 dBA below the noise levels associated with ‘average’ pavements have been achieved using quiet pavement.
• In areas where ‘quiet’ pavement is not an option or would not reduce exterior noise levels to meet the noise thresholds, forced‐air mechanical ventilation or building sound insulation such as sound‐ rated windows and doors would be provided to reduce interior noise levels in existing residences that are anticipated to exceed 45 dBA Ldn inside homes. This mitigation would be provided on a case‐by‐case basis and would typically be applicable in rural areas where the construction of sound barriers or the use of ‘quiet’ pavement is not found to be feasible and interior noise levels inside residences are anticipated to exceed 45 dBA Ldn.
PPD&C
Retain qualified acoustical
professional to conduct a
study as described.
Document completion of
study and implementation
of recommendations.
During detailed
project planning
or project
design prior to
project
approval.
Develop
construction
noise mitigation
measures.
Document
compliance
with measures
when materials
for construction
are approved.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 18 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule NOISE (continued)
MM NOI‐2a: In areas where new noise‐generating Campus or Community uses are proposed adjacent to or integrated with noise‐sensitive uses within the Campus or Community North, the project proponents shall retain a qualified acoustical consultant to prepare a design‐level study to define reasonable and feasible noise mitigation to reduce noise levels to comply with noise standards. The identified mitigation shall be included in the design of the project. Measures that can be implemented to achieve this include but are not limited to:
• Using site planning to minimize noise in noise‐sensitive areas by locating noise‐generating operations in areas that are set back or acoustically shielded from noise‐sensitive uses.
• Incorporating appropriate noise controls so that mechanical equipment from proposed uses does not generate noise levels in excess of 60 dBA Ldn at residential façades.
• Limiting the hours of noise‐generating activities, such as maintenance, loading and unloading, and drive‐through operations, to 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM, where potential noise conflicts exist.
PPD&C
Retain acoustical
consultant to prepare
design‐level study.
During detailed
project planning
or project
design prior to
project
approval.
During project
design phase.
Alt 1 – Impact NOI‐2:
Daily operations within
the Campus and
University Community
and special events at the
Campus could expose
existing off site and
future on‐site noise‐
sensitive receptors to
elevated noise levels.
MM NOI‐2b: Noise considerations shall be taken into account during the design of the multi‐purpose stadium and any other noise‐generating event facilities. The project proponents shall perform a design‐level study, conducted by a qualified acoustical professional, during the project level analysis to define reasonable and feasible noise mitigation for noise‐ sensitive receptors that are predicted to be exposed to noise levels that exceed the noise significance thresholds (60 dBA Ldn for residences, schools, and libraries, and 70 dBA Ldn for parks).
PPD&C
Review project design for
compliance with
recommendations in
study. Revise as needed to
incorporate noise control
features.
During detailed
project planning
or project
design prior to
project
approval.
Prior to final
project
approval.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 19 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule NOISE (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact NOI‐3:
Construction of the
Proposed Action could
expose existing off‐site
and future on‐site
noise‐sensitive
receptors to elevated
noise levels.
MM NOI‐3: Prior to initiation of campus or community construction, the project proponents shall approve a construction noise mitigation program including but not limited to the following.
• Construction activities within 500 feet of any residences shall be restricted to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays with no construction on Sundays and holidays. • All noise‐producing project equipment and vehicles using internal combustion engines shall be equipped where appropriate with exhaust mufflers and air‐inlet silencers in good operating condition that meet or exceed original factory specifications.
• Mobile or fixed “package” equipment (e.g., arc‐welders, air compressors) shall be equipped with shrouds and noise control features that are readily available for that type of equipment. • All mobile or fixed noise‐producing equipment used on the project that is regulated for noise output by local, state or federal agency shall comply with such regulation while engaged in project‐related activities.
• Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal combustion powered equipment, where practicable. • Material stockpiles, mobile equipment staging, construction vehicle parking, and maintenance areas shall be located as far as practicable from noise‐sensitive land uses.
• Stationary noise sources such as generators or pumps shall be located away from noise‐sensitive land uses as feasible.
• The use of noise‐producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. No project‐ related public address loudspeaker, two‐way radio, or music systems shall be audible at any adjacent noise‐sensitive receptor except for emergency use.
• The erection of temporary noise barriers shall be considered where project activity is unavoidably close to noise‐sensitive receptors.
PPD&C
Develop construction
noise mitigation program
and adopt as part of
standard construction
contract specifications.
Inspect construction sites
to verify that measures are
being implemented.
Prior to and
during
construction.
Confirm and
document
during
construction.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 20 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule NOISE (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact NOI‐3
(continued)
• The noisiest construction operations shall be scheduled to occur together to avoid continuing periods of the greatest annoyance, wherever possible.
• Construction vehicle trips shall be routed as far as practical from existing residential uses.
• The loudest campus construction activities, such as demolition, blasting, and pile driving, shall be scheduled during summer, Thanksgiving, winter, and spring breaks when fewer people would be disturbed by construction noise.
• Whenever possible, academic, administrative, and residential areas that will be subject to construction noise shall be informed a week before the start of each construction project.
Alt 1 – Impact NOI‐4:
Pile driving activities
during construction
could expose nearby
receptors to perceptible
levels of groundborne
vibration.
MM NOI‐4a: The project proponents shall avoid impact pile driving where possible in vibration‐sensitive areas. Drilled piles or the use of vibratory pile driving will be used where geological conditions permit their use. For impact pile driving activities occurring within 50 feet of typical structures, limit groundborne vibration due to construction activities to 0.50 inch/second, ppv (limit of potential for damage to typical structures) in the vertical direction at sensitive receptors. Since in many cases the information available during the preliminary engineering phase would not be sufficient to define specific vibration mitigation measures, the project proponents shall describe and commit to a mitigation plan to minimize construction vibration damage using all feasible means available.
Thresholds for individual structures could be established based on the assessment of each structure’s ability to withstand vibration, and vibration monitoring could be conducted to ensure compliance with the vibration thresholds.
PPD&C
Develop construction
vibration mitigation
program and adopt as
part of standard
construction contract
specifications.
Inspect construction sites
to verify that measures are
being implemented.
Prior to and
during
construction.
Document
compliance in
project file upon
completion of
construction.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 21 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule NOISE (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact NOI‐4
(continued)
MM NOI‐4b: For construction adjacent to highly sensitive uses such as laboratories, apply additional measures as feasible, including advance notice to occupants of sensitive facilities to ensure that precautions are taken in those facilities to protect ongoing activities from vibration effects.
PPD&C
Ensure that construction
vibration mitigation
program include
precautions for highly
sensitive uses as
described.
Inspect construction sites
to verify that precautions
are being implemented.
Prior to and
during
construction.
Document
compliance in
project file upon
completion of
construction.
Alt 1 – Impact NOI‐5:
New on‐site noise‐
sensitive land uses,
such as Campus and
University Community
residences, could be
exposed to noise levels
exceeding noise
thresholds.
MM NOI‐5a: For new noise‐sensitive Campus and University Community development, noise considerations shall be taken into account during initial site planning, in order to maximize shielding by the planned structures or other on‐site features. In areas where new residential development or noise‐sensitive park uses would be developed adjacent to noise‐generating project development or along Campus Parkway, the project proponent shall retain a qualified acoustical professional to prepare a design level study to define reasonable and feasible noise mitigation to reduce exterior and interior noise levels in noise‐sensitive areas to comply with the land use compatibility guidelines (60 dBA Ldn exterior and 45 dBA Ldn interior for residences). The identified mitigation shall be included in the design of the project. Measures that can be implemented to achieve reductions in noise levels include but are not limited to:
• Using site planning to minimize noise in parks and residential outdoor activity areas by locating these areas as far as possible from noise sources or at locations behind buildings.
PPD&C
Retain acoustical
consultant to prepare
design‐level study and
noise mitigation plan.
During detailed
project planning
or project
design prior to
project
approval.
During project
design phase.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 22 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule NOISE (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact NOI‐5
(continued)
• Paving Campus Parkway section within the project site with a ’quiet’ pavement type such as a porous Open‐Grade Asphalt Concrete with fine aggregate size. Noise reductions of 3 to 4 dBA below noise levels associated with ‘Average’ pavements have been achieved using a ‘quiet’ pavement.
• Using noise barriers or berms to acoustically shield these uses where site planning methods are not sufficient to reduce noise in noise‐ sensitive exterior use areas to below 60 dBA Ldn.
• Providing mechanical ventilation so that windows can remain closed to maintain interior noise levels below 45 dBA Ldn where exterior noise levels at residential façades are predicted to exceed 60 dBA Ldn. • Providing sound‐rated windows and applying other noise‐reducing construction methods where exterior noise levels at residential facades are predicted to exceed 65 dBA Ldn.
PPD&C
Review project design for
compliance with
recommendations in
study. Revise as needed to
incorporate noise control
features.
During detailed
project planning
or project
design prior to
project
approval.
Prior to final
project
approval.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION
Alt 1 – Impact PUB‐1:
The Proposed Action
would increase demand
for law enforcement
services and would
require the construction
of new facilities.
MM PUB‐1: The Campus shall maintain a minimum ratio of 0.7 officer per 1,000 population.
PPD&C
Document compliance
with mitigation measure.
During
operation.
Annually.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 23 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION (continued)
MM PUB‐6a: The University shall work with the County to develop a program for joint use of on campus sports, recreational, and parking facilities.
PPD&C
Work with County to
implement mitigation
measures.
During detailed
project planning
or project
design prior to
project
approval.
MM PUB‐6b: The University shall work with the County to avoid physical deterioration of existing facilities at Lake Yosemite Regional Park, and/or improve park facilities within the existing park site as necessitated by the increased uses associated with development of the Campus.
PPD&C
Work with County to
implement mitigation
measures.
During detailed
project planning
or project
design prior to
project
approval.
Alt 1 – Impact PUB‐6:
The Proposed Action
would increase the use
of Lake Yosemite
Regional Park which
could accelerate
physical deterioration
of park facilities.
MM PUB‐6c: The University will pay its fair share of the cost of necessary improvements to the regional park The University’s share of funding will be based on the percentage that on campus residential population represents of the total population in eastern Merced County at the time that an improvement is implemented.
PPD&C
Negotiate with County to
determine fair share
contribution toward
feasible and required
environmental mitigation
measures for
improvements to Lake
Yosemite Regional Park.
During detailed
project planning
or project
design prior to
project
approval.
Following
completion of
the
environmental
review process
for new park
facilities, if
mitigation costs
are identified in
connection with
those facilities
proposed
because of the
implementation
of the 2009
LRDP.
MM PUB‐6d: In recognition of the sensitive resources present on lands immediately adjacent to the regional park, all regional park improvement projects that are implemented by the County within 250 feet of the park’s eastern boundary pursuant to Mitigation Measures PUB‐6b and PUB‐6c above, will implement mitigation measures to avoid and minimize indirect effects on biological resources. These measures shall be based on and as effective as the measures in the Conservation Strategy to control indirect impacts to biological resources.
PPD&C
Document compliance
with mitigation measure
in conjunction with
Mitigation Measures PUB‐
6b and PUB‐6c above.
During detailed
project planning
or project
design prior to
project
approval.
Document
compliance
with mitigation
measures prior
to approval of
improvements
of the regional
park.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 24 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
Alt 1 – Impact TRANS‐
1: The Proposed Action
would contribute 1
percent or more to the
traffic growth projected
for 18 roadway
segments planned to be
widened in the future,
cause the LOS of two
study intersections to
deteriorate to
unacceptable levels, and
result in a significant
increase in delay at one
intersection.
MM TRANS‐1A: Campus Traffic Mitigation Program (CTMP). The Campus Traffic Mitigation Program (CTMP) is designed to mitigate off‐site impacts associated with the roadway segments and intersections affected by the development of the Campus through full build‐out, as described in the 2009 LRDP. It includes a combined approach of (1) transportation measures to reduce peak‐hour trips, and (2) monetary contributions to roadway improvements identified as necessary to mitigate the impacts of the Proposed Action. CEQA provides that an agency can mitigate its contribution to local and regional environmental impacts by contributing its proportional share of funding to mitigation measures designed to alleviate the identified impact (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(a)(3)).
The portion of the CTMP that provides for monetary contributions consists of specific mitigation measures for certain roadway segments and intersections adjacent to the Campus (including Lake Road between Yosemite Avenue and Bellevue Road and Bellevue Road between G Street and Lake Road) that are anticipated to reach capacity soon after the Campus reaches 10,000 full‐time equivalent (FTE) students. The University anticipates that the County of Merced (or the City of Merced if annexed) may plan and implement improvements to these segments and intersections before the Campus reaches 10,000 students. The University also anticipates that the County (or the City) may choose to construct new regional facilities (such as the Campus Parkway) or oversize new facilities in lieu of addressing capacity issues by more limited improvements on the affected segments (e.g., widening Lake Road). To address these issues, the CMTP contains detailed provisions for the University’s share of funding these anticipated improvements upon the notice to proceed for construction. To the extent that the County (or the City) chooses not to proceed with the specific improvements identified in MM TRANS‐1A‐4, the University will address campus impacts under MM TRANS‐1A‐5.
The CTMP will consist of the following elements/measures:
Impact Sciences, Inc. 25 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC (continued)
MM TRANS‐1A‐1: Trip Reduction Measures
Travel Demand Management. To reduce on‐ and off‐campus vehicle trips and resulting impacts, the University will implement a range of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies. TDM strategies will include measures to increase transit and shuttle use, encourage alternative transportation modes including bicycle transportation, implement parking polices that reduce demand, and implement other mechanisms that reduce vehicle trips to and from the campus and community.
Transit Enhancement. To enhance transit systems serving the Campus and University Community, the University will work cooperatively with the City of Merced, County of Merced, Cat Tracks, The Bus, StaRT, YARTS, and other local agencies to coordinate service routes with existing and proposed shuttle and transit programs.
PPD&C
Report on provision of
TDM programs, transit
services, and usage of
these programs and
services.
Throughout
LRDP
development.
At intervals of
1,500 FTE
student growth,
relative to 2009
LRDP baseline.
Sustainability Measures. The University shall review individual projects proposed under the 2009 LRDP for consistency with UC sustainable transportation policy and UC Merced TDM strategies set forth in the 2009 LRDP to ensure that bicycle and pedestrian improvements, alternative fuel infrastructure, transit stops, and other project features that promote alternative transportation are incorporated to the extent feasible. The University shall monitor the performance of campus TDM strategies through annual surveys.
PPD&C
Report on sustainable
elements of each building
project.
Throughout
LRDP
development.
Prior to design
approval of
each building
project.
Alt 1 – Impact TRANS‐
1 (continued)
Campus Housing. The University will continue to pursue the implementation of affordable on‐campus student housing to reduce peak‐ hour commuter trips to the campus. The University’s goal is for 50 percent of student population to live on campus.
PPD&C
Plan for provision of new
housing projects to keep
pace with projected
student body growth.
Report on existing and
projected housing
provision on a yearly
basis.
Throughout
LRDP
development.
Report on a
yearly basis.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 26 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC (continued)
MM TRANS‐1A‐2: Campus Traffic Monitoring
The University will monitor trip generation resulting from the campus development under the 2009 LRDP to track the actual trip generation relative to the projections in this EIS/EIR. The University will conduct traffic cordon counts of the campus traffic with each 1,500 person increase in student population measured by three‐term average FTE students enrollment increases with 2007‐08 as the base year. The University will report the findings to the City and the County, and these findings will be used to calculate the University’s proportional share of responsibility to fund local transportation improvements as described below.
PPD&C
Conduct AM and PM
peak period traffic counts
at Campus gateway(s)
and report trip generation
rate per FTE student,
relative to Draft EIS/EIR
rate.
Throughout
LRDP
development.
At intervals of
1,500 FTE
student growth,
relative to 2009
LRDP baseline.
Alt 1 – Impact TRANS‐
1 (continued)
MM TRANS‐1A‐3: Determination of Proportional Share Attributable to Campus
The University will monitor its traffic based on MM TRANS‐1A‐2 above and use the data to calculate its proportional share of the cost of each improvement at each location noted in Table 4.13‐10. The Campus’s proportional share of each improvement will be determined by applying the actual trip generation rate at the time that the improvement is needed.
The formula to calculate the proportional share will be:
(Actual trip generation rate on a per student basis)/(the projected trip generation rate) x the projected percentages in Table 4.13‐10 The use of the actual trip generation rate may increase or decrease the Campus’s proportional share compared to the projected percentages in Table 4.13‐10.
PPD&C
Report proportional share
based on monitored trip
generation, using
improvement cost data as
described.
Throughout
LRDP
development.
At intervals of
1,500 FTE
student growth,
relative to 2009
LRDP baseline.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 27 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact TRANS‐
1 (continued)
MM TRANS‐1A‐4: Monetary Contributions to Roadway Improvements Adjacent to the Campus
Scope of Mitigation. The University will commit to pay its proportional share of the cost of improvements to three intersections and two roadway segments that are adjacent to the Campus at the time that improvements to these facilities are triggered, as indicated below:
Construct Campus Parkway between Yosemite Avenue and the Campus ‐ when the County of Merced (or the City of Merced if annexed) demonstrates to the University that Lake Road from Yosemite Avenue to Bellevue Road is at 90% of its capacity (as described in Table 4.13‐6) and that the need for improvement is imminent.
Widen Bellevue from 2 to 4 lanes from G Street to Lake Road ‐ when the County of Merced (or the City of Merced if annexed) demonstrates to the University that Bellevue Road between G Street and Lake Road is at 90% of its capacity (as described in Table 4.13‐6) and that the need for improvement is imminent. (Future widening of Bellevue Road from 4 to 6 lanes will be mitigated pursuant to MM TRANS‐1‐5).
Intersections of Bellevue Road/Lake Road, Myers Gate/Lake Road, and Yosemite Avenue/Lake Road ‐ when the County of Merced (or the City of Merced if annexed) demonstrates that the intersections listed above are approaching an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS) and the need for an improvement is imminent.
Contribution of Campus’ Proportional Share. At each of these locations, the University’s proportional share will be estimated based on the percentages reported in Table 4.13‐10 which represent the projected proportional share adjusted per the discussion under Determination of Proportional Share Attributable to Campus, above.
PPD&C
(1) Internally commit
proportional share
funding;
(2) Pay affected
jurisdiction.
(1) When
affected
jurisdiction
programs each
project,
provides a
construction
cost estimate,
and completes a
full project
funding plan;
(2) Prior to
project
construction.
As each
improvement
project is
programmed,
cost estimates
are prepared,
and full funding
plans are
prepared.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 28 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact TRANS‐
1 (continued)
Contribution of University Community’s Proportional Share. The University will advance the proportional share of the cost of the specific improvements included in this section associated with the University Community (as identified on Table 4.‐13.10) if, prior to the issuance of any entitlements for development in the University Community (including but not limited to any specific plan, tentative map or permit), the County (or the City) enacts an enforceable fee program to collect sufficient funds from all developers in the University Community to fully reimburse the University for any amount overpaid beyond its proportional share. The fee program must be updated annually to ensure that sufficient fees are collected to fully reimburse the University for the amount advanced, including interest associated with any financing of the cost of the University Community’s share of the improvements. The fee program shall provide that the fees collected from development within University Community for purpose of paying for the improvements in this section shall be paid directly to the University. If a fee mechanism has not been adopted prior to the issuance of a notice to proceed for an improvement, the University’s commitment to advance the funding under this section will not arise until such program has been adopted.
Commitment of Funds. Funding will be internally committed by the University when an improvement project is included in the County (or the City) capital improvement program, and the County (or the City) provides a construction cost estimate and a project funding plan to the University.
Timing of Mitigation Payments. The funds will be disbursed to the County (or the City) upon issuance of the notice to proceed with construction of the project.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 29 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact TRANS‐
1 (continued)
MM TRANS‐1A‐5: Monetary Contributions to Other Roadway Improvements
Scope of Mitigation. The University will commit to fund its proportional share of the cost of all roadway improvements at the locations shown in Table 4.13‐10 and will commit to fund its proportional share of only those planned improvements for roadway segments that are listed in Table 4.13‐ 9 and mitigation for intersections listed in Table 4.13‐11. (Improvements to the intersection of Yosemite Avenue and Lake Road, construction of Campus Parkway between Yosemite Avenue and the Campus, and Bellevue Road widening from 2 to 4 lanes are addressed under MM TRANS‐1A‐4).
Contribution of Campus’ Proportional Share. At each of these locations, the University’s proportional share will be estimated based on the percentages reported in Table 4.13‐10 which represent the University’s proportional share adjusted per the discussion under Determination of Proportional Share Attributable to Campus, above.
Commitment of Funds. Funding will be internally committed by the University at the point at which an improvement project is included in the County (or the City)’s capital improvement program, and the County (or the City) provides a construction cost estimate and a project funding plan to the University.
Timing of Mitigation Payments. The funds will be disbursed to the County (or the City) upon issuance of the notice to proceed with construction of the project.
PPD&C
(1) Internally commit
proportional share
funding;
(2) Pay affected
jurisdiction.
(1) When
affected
jurisdiction
programs each
project,
provides a
construction
cost estimate,
and completes a
full project
funding plan;
(2) Prior to
project
construction.
As each
improvement
project is
programmed,
cost estimates
are prepared,
and full funding
plans are
prepared.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 30 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC (continued)
Alt 1 – Impact TRANS‐
1 (continued)
MM TRANS‐1A‐6: Alternate Improvements
Specific feasible traffic improvements are identified in Tables 4.13‐11 and
4.13‐9 to mitigate each of the Proposed Action’s significant traffic impacts to a less than significant level. The identified improvements would be planned, designed, and implemented by the City of Merced, Merced County, or other affected jurisdictions. Detailed planning, environmental analysis and engineering studies for some of these improvements have not been completed and the implementing agencies have not committed to all identified improvements. As a result, the final configuration of future transportation improvements may vary from those identified in Tables
4.13‐11 and 4‐13‐9. The University will monitor its traffic based on MM TRANS‐1A‐2 above and use the data to calculate its incremental responsibility towards the Campus’s projected share of each improvement location noted in Table 4.13‐10. If any improvement described herein is found to be ineffective or infeasible, and alternative improvements are determined to be required to achieve an acceptable LOS, the University will work in collaboration with the County or the City to implement alternative improvements.
PPD&C
Consult with County and
City staff at each 1,500‐
student monitoring stage,
to determine whether
alternate improvements
are under consideration,
and discuss efficacy of the
alternate improvements.
Throughout
LRDP
development.
At each 1,500‐
student
monitoring
stage.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 31 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Cumulative MM HYD‐3a: The University shall support MAGPI in pursuing and securing cooperative arrangements with state and local agencies for purposes of expanding the basin’s conjunctive use capabilities.
PPD&C
Coordinate with MAGPI.
Prior to and
during
development of
Campus.
Confirm that
cooperative
agreements
have been
secured.
Cumulative MM HYD‐3c: To reduce its demand for water, the Campus shall implement an aggressive water conservation program which will consist of the following elements:
• Incorporate water‐efficient landscaping practices in all new landscape installations. Water‐conservation landscaping practices shall include, but not be limited to, use of water‐efficient plants, temporary irrigation systems for plant establishment areas where mature plants will be able to survive without regular irrigation, grouping of plants according to water requirements, design of planting areas to maximize irrigation pattern efficiency, and mulch covering in planting areas.
PPD&C
Incorporate water efficient
landscaping practices in
all new landscape
installation.
Prior to project
design
approval.
Confirm that all
landscaping
meets new
standard.
Cumulative Impact
HYD‐3: Development of
the Campus and
University Community,
in conjunction with
other past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable
future development in
the project area, would
not substantially
interfere with
groundwater recharge
but would deplete
groundwater supplies
resulting in an
overdraft of the
regional groundwater
aquifer.
• Continue to install low flow plumbing fixtures in all new buildings. PPD&C to continue installing low flow
plumbing fixtures.
When plumbing
fixtures are
installed.
Document all
new fixtures are
low‐flow.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 32 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY (continued)
• As new technologies become available, the Camus shall conduct pilot programs for high‐efficiency plumbing fixtures including, but not limited to, dual‐flush toilets. If a piloted technology proves to be successful (i.e., high‐efficiency fixtures that are effective in water savings and do not require more maintenance than the existing standard), the Campus shall revise its standards to require use of the fixtures in all new buildings and in existing buildings as existing fixtures need to be replaced.
PPD&C
Implement pilot
programs.
Revise campus standards
as warranted.
Pilot programs
ongoing.
Depends on
results of pilot
programs.
Document
results of
program.
Confirm
standards have
been revised.
• Require that new contracts for washing machines in student residences be certified by the Consortium on Energy Efficiency to have a water factor of 5.5 or less or meet an equivalent standard. New washing machines purchased for use in athletic facilities shall meet applicable standards for water efficiency for institutional machines.
PPD&C
Specifications for washing
machines to require that
standard is met.
When new
machines are
purchased.
Confirm new
machines meet
standards and
document.
• Within one year following approval of the 2009 LRDP, the Campus shall implement a water conservation education program for campus residents. This will include but not be limited to:
− Distribution to residents of employee housing of education materials covering topics such as basic home water conservation practices, plumbing retrofits and replacements, and strategies to conserve landscape irrigation.
PPD&C
Provide residents with
information.
Implement
water
conservation
programs with
residents.
Confirm and
document that
information has
been provided.
− Designation of a staff member who will be responsible for developing and implementing a water conservation education and awareness program to reduce water consumption in student residences, dining halls, and student affairs facilities.
Designate a staff member
as a water conservation
educator.
Within one year
of LRDP
approval.
Confirm staff
member has
been
designated.
• Within two years following approval of the 2009 LRDP, the Campus shall initiate a study on feasible measures for utilization of reclaimed water (including rainwater, grey water, cooling tower blow down water and/or recycled water) in new development. Potential uses of reclaimed water include cooling, irrigation, toilet flushing, and industrial water. The study shall contain a plan to utilize reclaimed water in new development as feasible and effective.
Initiate study of reclaimed
water as specified.
Within two
years of LRDP
approval.
Document
initiation of
reclaimed water
study.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 33 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule • The Campus shall, at intervals of no more than five years during the term of the 2009 LRDP, conduct roundtable discussions with representatives of relevant campus departments, and conduct additional studies of new technologies as needed to identify feasible and effective water conservation measures for implementation on the Campus during the subsequent five year period. The following are among the measures that shall be considered:
− Retrofitting existing water meters such that building use and irrigation are separately metered.
− Replacing natural turf on athletic fields with artificial turf. • Installing timers on showers in student residences.
Discuss potential effective
water conservation
measures with the
Campus departments that
could be studied for
implementation.
Every five years
after approval
of LRDP.
Document
results of
discussions.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 34 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Cumulative Impact
UTILS‐1: Development
of the Campus and
University Community,
in conjunction with
other past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable
future development in
the project area, would
not require the
construction of new
water supply facilities
that would result in
significant
environmental impacts.
The cumulative
development would
result in a substantial
increase in demand for
water which potentially
could result in
significant
environmental impacts.
Cumulative MM UTILS‐1a: The University shall implement Cumulative Mitigation Measure HYD‐3a.
See actions for
Cumulative MM HYD‐
3a.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 35 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting
Responsibility and Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS (continued)
Cumulative MM UTILS‐2a: The University shall continue to monitor and minimize the total amount of wastewater discharged from the site.
PPD&C
Monitor amount of
wastewater discharged. If
unexpected increases in
wastewater volume occur
over time, minimize
discharge.
Ongoing Document
discharge
amount of
wastewater
annually.
Cumulative Impact
UTILS‐2: Development
of the Campus and
University Community,
in conjunction with
other past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable
future development in
the project area, would
result in a significant
cumulative impact on
wastewater collection
and treatment facilities.
Cumulative MM UTILS‐2b: The University shall evaluate the feasibility of developing a recycled water plant on the Campus or in Community North to further reduce wastewater flows discharged to the City’s sewer system.
See actions for
Cumulative MM HYD‐3c.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 36 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Table 2
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
UCM 2020 Project
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring/Reporting
Action(s)
Mitigation
Timing
Monitoring
Schedule
AESTHETICS
UCM 2020 Impact AES‐
1: Development under
the UCM 2020 Project
would affect scenic
vistas.
UCM 2020 MM AES‐1: Implement Program Level Mitigation Measures AES‐1a and ‐1b.
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation
Measures AES‐1a and ‐1b
above.
UCM 2020 Impact
AES‐2: Development
under the UCM 2020
Project would
substantially alter the
visual quality and
character of the site and
its surroundings.
UCM 2020 MM AES‐2: Implement Program Level Mitigation Measure AES‐3.
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation
Measure AES‐3.
AIR QUALITY
UCM 2020 Impact
AQ‐2: The UCM 2020
Project would result in
operational emissions
that would violate an
air quality standard or
contribute substantially
to an existing or
projected air quality
violation.
UCM 2020 MM AQ‐2: Implement Program Level Mitigation Measures AQ‐2a through AQ‐2c.
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation
Measures AQ‐2a through
AQ‐2c.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 37 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule AIR QUALITY (continued)
UCM 2020 Impact AQ‐
3: The UCM 2020
Project would result in
a cumulatively
considerable net
increase of a criteria
pollutant for which the
project region is
nonattainment under an
applicable federal or
state ambient air quality
standard (including
releasing emissions,
which exceed
quantitative thresholds
for ozone precursors).
UCM 2020 MM AQ‐3: Program Level Mitigation Measures AQ‐2 would apply to this impact. No further mitigation is available.
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation
Measures AQ‐2.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
UCM 2020 Impact
GEO‐1: Development
under the UCM 2020
Project could expose
people or structures to
increased risk related to
ground shaking and
seismically induced
ground failure,
including liquefaction.
UCM 2020 MM GEO‐1: Implement Program Level Mitigation Measure GEO‐2.
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation
Measure GEO‐2.
Impact Sciences, Inc. 38 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Monitoring/Reporting Mitigation Monitoring
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Timing Schedule HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
UCM 2020 Impact
HAZ‐1: Development
under the UCM 2020
Project could be located
on a site that potentially
contains hazardous
materials and could
create a significant
hazard to the public or
the environment.
UCM 2020 MM HAZ‐1: Implement Program Level Mitigation Measure HAZ‐4.
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation
Measure HAZ‐4.
NOISE
UCM 2020 Impact
NOI‐2: Construction of
the UCM 2020 Project
could expose existing
off‐site and future on‐
site noise‐sensitive
receptors to elevated
noise levels and
groundborne vibration.
UCM 2020 MM NOI‐2a: Implement Program Level Mitigation Measures NOI‐3, NOI‐4a, and NOI‐4b.
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation
Measures NOI‐3, NOI‐4a,
and NOI‐4b.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION
UCM 2020 Impact PUB‐
1: The UCM 2020
Project would increase
demand for law
enforcement services
and would require the
construction of new
facilities.
UCM 2020 MM PUB‐1: Implement Program Level Mitigation Measure PUB‐1
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation
Measure PUB‐1
Impact Sciences, Inc. 39 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Impact Sciences, Inc. 40 UC Merced Long Range Development Plan 0974.001 March 2009
Significant Impact Mitigation Measure
Monitoring/Reporting
Action(s)
Mitigation
Timing
Monitoring
Schedule
PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION (continued)
UCM 2020 Impact PUB‐
2: The UCM 2020
Project would increase
the use of Lake
Yosemite Regional
Park, which could
accelerate physical
deterioration of park
facilities.
UCM 2020 MM PUB‐2: Implement Program Level Mitigation Measures PUB‐6a through PUB‐6d.
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation
Measures PUB‐6a
through PUB‐6d.
TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
UCM 2020 Impact
TRANS‐2: With the
addition of project
traffic, the LOS of three
of the study
intersections would
deteriorate to
unacceptable levels
under Existing Plus
UCM 2020 Project
conditions.
UCM 2020 MM TRANS‐2:
The Campus shall implement Program Level Mitigation Measure TRANS‐ 1, pursuant to which it will monitor traffic growth related to the campus and pay its proportional share of the cost of the required improvement.
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation Measure
TRANS‐1
UCM 2020 Impact
TRANS‐3:
Implementation of the
UCM 2020 Project
would result in an
exceedance of the LOS
threshold along local
roadway segments
under 2020 Plus UCM
2020 Project conditions.
UCM 2020 MM TRANS‐3: The Campus shall implement Program Level Mitigation Measure TRANS‐1, pursuant to which it will monitor traffic growth related to the campus and pay its proportional share of the cost of the above listed improvement.
See actions for Program
Level Mitigation Measure
TRANS‐1
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
To: ____ Of
fice of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency)
P.O. Box 3044 City of Merced
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 678 West 18th St.
Merced, CA 95340
X County Clerk
Count y of Merced
2222 M Street
Merced, CA 95340
Project Title: Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding and amendments to two Agreements between the City and UC Merced.
Project Applicant: City of Merced
Project Location (Specific): UC Merced Campus, 5200 Lake Road Project Location - City: Merced Project Location - County: Merced Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project: Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding between the City and UC Merced, the 1st Amendment to the Capital Facilities Fee Agreement between the City and UC Merced, and the 1st Amendment to the Transportation Agreement between the City and UC Merced
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Merced Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: City of Merced Exempt Status: (check one)
___ Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
___ Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
___ Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
X Categorical Exemption. State Type and Section Number: 15061 (b)(3)_____ ___ St atutory Exemptions. State Code Number: ____________________. ___ General Rule (Sec. 15061 (b)(3))
Rea
sons why Project is Exempt: The proposed project includes the approval of a Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU) and Amendments to two different agreements between the City of Merced and the Regents of the University of California. It can be seen with reasonable certainty that the act of approving the MOU and amendments would not have an effect on the environment. Therefore, this project is exempt per Section 15061 (b)(3). … Le
ad Agency: City of Merced
Contact Person: _____________________ Area Code/Telephone:(209) 385-6858 Sig
nature: _________________________ Date: ______________ Title: _________________ X Signed by Lead Agency Date Received for Filing at OPR:_______________________ (I f applicable)
Authority Cited: Sections 21083 and 21110. Public Resources Code Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1. Public Resources Code
EXHIBIT D