Cities Index.
Presentation VST - JPA Study Session 7-20-26.pdf

City Council/Public Finance and Economic Development Authority/Parking Authority
July 20, 2026

Document
Presentation VST - JPA Study Session 7-20-26.pdf
Meeting
July 20, 2026
Body
City Council/Public Finance and Economic Development Authority/Parking Authority
Original file
278 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cityofmerced.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

Funding Option for Critical Infrastructure
For
Virgina Smith T rust (VST) Development
July 20, 2026

Process
22 Formation of Community Facilities District
 Resolution of Intention
 Resolution of Formation
 Second Reading of Ordinance
CFD Bond Sales
 Resolution of Issuance as development takes
place
Formation of Joint P owers Authority (JP A)
 Merced County Board of Education
 City of Merced
 Other?

Infrastructure Needs
3 School
City
 Fund Charter School
 Fund Transportation
Fees
 Fund Sewer Collection
Fees
 Fund Water Fees
 Fund Treatment Plant
Fees
Infrastructure Broken out into T wo Tiers
4 Tier 1
Tier 2
 Charter School
 Transportation
 Sewer Collection
 Water
 Treatment Plant
JP A and Debt Obligations
5  Local governments may establish a JPA to jointly
exercise common powers; JPA may exercise statutory
powers, including forming a CFD.
MCOE and other public agencies, including the City,
are authorized by the California JPA Act to establish a JPA.
 CFDs can levy special taxes and issue bonds to finance improvements owned by the JPA’s members, including
MCOE and the City.

JP A examples
6  Examples of current JPAs:
 Hemet USD and CFD No. 2004-1
 Riverside USD and Western Municipal Water District
 Temecula Valley USD and CFD No. 2000-1
 William S Hart Union High School District and CFD No. 88-4  Castaic Union SD and Saugus Union SD
 Rio Bravo Greeley Union SD, Norris SD, and Rosedale Union SD  City of Tustin and Tustin Housing Authority
 Jurupa USD and CFD No. 10
 Golden Valley USD and CFD No. 2017-1
 Moreno Valley USD and CFD No. 2004-5
 Corona-Norco USD and CFD No. 88-1
 Fullerton SD and CFD No. 2000-1
 Perris Union HSD and CFD No. 91-1
 Menifee USD and CFD No. 94-1
 Romoland SD and CFD No. 91-1
 Murrieta Valley USD and CFD No. 90-1
 Redevelopment Agency of the City of San José and the City of San José Benefits of CFDs
7 Office of Ed and City
 Fund much needed
facilities
 Assist with development
 Bridge funding gap
 Specified area
 Bond Financing
 Surplus special taxes

DEVELOPERS
 Better marketability
 Lower costs to develop/
build
 Taxes tied to the
property

HOMEOWNERS
 Newer infrastructure
 Lower purchase price
 Taxes tied to the
property
 Pay only when one owns
the property
5-Step CFD Formation Process
Landowner
P etition
Resolution
of
Intention
CFD
Report
Public
Hearing
&
Landowner
Election
Resolution
of Formation
/Ordinance
1 2 3 4 5
Bond
Authorization
Process
8 VST Project Information
9 Projected Development:
 4,063 total units, 2,689 in Phase 1 and 1,375 in Phase 2  Square Footage Range: 750-3,250
 Average Price Point: $350,000-698,750*
 Special Tax Range: $585 - $2,100*
*Preliminary; subject to change.

Funded Unfunded Funded Unfunded Funded Unfunded
Tier 1 Funding $37,000,000 $37,000,000 $0 $37,000,000 $0 $37,000,000 $0 Tier 2 Funding $58,697,957 $9,514,157 $49,183,800 $29,561,571 $29,136,386 $49,577,920 $9,120,037 Total $95,697,957 $46,514,157 $49,183,800 $66,561,571 $29,136,386 $86,577,920 $9,120,037 Funding based on Project Fund
with 1.50% Effective Tax Rate
Funding based on Project Fund
with 1.60% Effective Tax Rate
Funding based on Project Fund
with 1.70% Effective Tax RateMaximum Total Funding

← All documents from this meeting