CityCouncil_RegularSession_Attachments_03_15_2022 — Milpitas City Council, March 15, 2022 (part 5 of 5)

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 227
Table 75: Q14d. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Preparing for emergencies and natural disasters
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 228
Table 75: Q14d. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Preparing for emergencies and natural disasters
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 229
Table 76: Q14e. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing programs to help seniors Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

DATA CLLCTN
MODE
------------------
Q1 MILPITAS DIRECTION
-----------------------------
Q2 LIFE QUALITY
----------------------------------------
Q7 GROWTH RATE
----------------------------------------
Q8 POLICE

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 346 104 69 173 173 204 62 80 99 22 291 55 73 148 24 174 102 242 63 7 88 13 TOTAL SATISFIED 62 67 76 71 53 70 52 50 74 66 64 51 55 61 39 66 72 58 70 83 71 75 Very satisfied 20 24 34 28 12 24 8 21 28 29 21 18 20 22 9 20 21 20 21 49 19 26 Somewhat satisfied 42 42 42 42 41 46 43 28 46 37 43 34 35 38 30 46 51 38 50 34 51 48 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 8 5 11 7 9 6 14 8 8 15 6 16 13 8 5 8 7 9 6 17 6 9 Somewhat dissatisfied 5 3 3 3 6 3 10 6 4 5 4 10 8 5 5 5 3 6 3 0 3 0 Very dissatisfied 3 1 8 4 2 4 4 2 4 9 3 6 5 3 0 3 4 3 3 17 3 9 NO OPINION/DK/NA 30 29 12 22 38 24 35 43 18 20 30 33 32 31 56 26 22 33 24 0 23 16 No opinion/DK/NA 30 29 12 22 38 24 35 43 18 20 30 33 32 31 56 26 22 33 24 0 23 16 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

WITH CITY
-------------------
Q17 CITY CONTACT SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q19 RESIDENCY LENGTH
----------------------------------------------------
Q21 RESIDENCE
-------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 230
Table 76: Q14e. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing programs to help seniors
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 231
Table 76: Q14e. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing programs to help seniors
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 232
Table 77: Q14f. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing bicycle lanes and paths Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 346 104 69 173 173 204 62 80 99 22 291 55 73 148 24 174 102 242 63 7 88 13 TOTAL SATISFIED 65 71 72 71 59 73 43 62 76 71 68 49 62 63 34 71 68 64 77 78 69 64 Very satisfied 21 30 26 28 13 23 11 22 36 30 21 17 15 21 0 23 23 20 24 66 20 46 Somewhat satisfied 44 41 45 43 46 50 31 40 41 41 47 32 47 41 34 48 45 44 53 12 49 18 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 19 21 21 21 18 18 29 14 21 23 18 26 21 20 46 14 21 18 18 22 20 29 Somewhat dissatisfied 14 19 9 15 12 11 24 13 17 23 13 21 18 17 29 9 16 13 13 22 16 16 Very dissatisfied 5 1 12 5 5 7 5 1 4 0 5 6 3 4 17 5 5 5 5 0 4 13 NO OPINION/DK/NA 16 8 7 8 24 9 29 24 3 6 14 25 17 17 20 14 11 18 6 0 12 7 No opinion/DK/NA 16 8 7 8 24 9 29 24 3 6 14 25 17 17 20 14 11 18 6 0 12 7 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 233
Table 77: Q14f. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing bicycle lanes and paths Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 234
Table 77: Q14f. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing bicycle lanes and paths Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 235
Table 78: Q14g. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Paving and repairing streets and roads Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 346 104 69 173 173 204 62 80 99 22 291 55 73 148 24 174 102 242 63 7 88 13 TOTAL SATISFIED 69 79 75 77 61 80 45 61 83 59 75 41 64 62 66 76 63 72 70 62 66 45 Very satisfied 24 28 44 35 13 28 13 24 32 32 25 19 22 24 25 24 23 24 26 37 24 20 Somewhat satisfied 45 51 31 43 48 53 32 37 51 27 50 22 42 38 41 52 40 47 44 25 42 25 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 27 18 22 20 34 15 55 34 15 41 21 59 36 35 34 19 33 25 27 38 29 55 Somewhat dissatisfied 16 12 12 12 21 10 28 24 9 19 13 36 18 22 24 11 12 18 6 0 11 24 Very dissatisfied 10 6 10 7 14 5 28 10 6 23 8 22 18 13 11 8 20 6 21 38 19 31 NO OPINION/DK/NA 4 3 3 3 5 4 0 5 1 0 4 1 0 3 0 5 4 4 3 0 5 0 No opinion/DK/NA 4 3 3 3 5 4 0 5 1 0 4 1 0 3 0 5 4 4 3 0 5 0 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 236
Table 78: Q14g. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Paving and repairing streets and roads
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 237
Table 78: Q14g. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Paving and repairing streets and roads
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 238
Table 79: Q14h. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Maintaining public facilities and infrastructure Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 346 104 69 173 173 204 62 80 99 22 291 55 73 148 24 174 102 242 63 7 88 13 TOTAL SATISFIED 73 82 89 85 62 88 45 59 88 41 80 39 55 65 82 79 69 75 78 66 70 65 Very satisfied 26 34 42 37 14 34 12 17 47 16 29 10 12 19 50 28 24 27 30 11 25 20 Somewhat satisfied 48 48 47 47 48 54 33 42 41 26 51 28 43 47 32 51 45 48 47 55 45 46 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 15 12 4 9 21 7 42 15 3 34 9 45 28 20 14 10 22 12 19 34 20 35 Somewhat dissatisfied 11 10 4 8 15 6 26 12 3 12 8 28 18 14 10 9 15 10 10 13 14 23 Very dissatisfied 4 2 0 1 6 0 15 3 0 22 1 17 10 7 4 1 7 2 9 20 6 11 NO OPINION/DK/NA 12 7 7 7 17 6 13 26 8 25 11 16 17 14 3 11 9 13 3 0 10 0 No opinion/DK/NA 12 7 7 7 17 6 13 26 8 25 11 16 17 14 3 11 9 13 3 0 10 0 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 239
Table 79: Q14h. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Maintaining public facilities and infrastructure
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 240
Table 79: Q14h. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Maintaining public facilities and infrastructure
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 241
Table 80: Q14i. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing opportunities to be involved in City government
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 346 104 69 173 173 204 62 80 99 22 291 55 73 148 24 174 102 242 63 7 88 13 TOTAL SATISFIED 53 61 77 67 38 61 37 43 65 42 56 38 42 51 19 59 50 54 53 49 51 45 Very satisfied 13 18 18 18 8 18 8 5 20 20 14 10 8 12 4 15 17 11 21 0 17 14 Somewhat satisfied 40 43 59 49 30 44 29 38 45 22 42 27 34 39 15 44 33 42 32 49 34 31 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 17 14 10 12 22 14 28 16 12 23 15 28 19 15 36 16 20 15 15 51 16 44 Somewhat dissatisfied 12 8 2 6 18 10 19 11 6 6 11 17 11 10 28 11 13 11 9 12 12 23 Very dissatisfied 5 5 8 6 4 4 9 5 6 17 4 12 7 5 8 5 6 5 6 39 4 21 NO OPINION/DK/NA 30 26 13 21 40 25 34 41 23 35 30 34 39 34 45 25 30 31 32 0 33 11 No opinion/DK/NA 30 26 13 21 40 25 34 41 23 35 30 34 39 34 45 25 30 31 32 0 33 11 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 242
Table 80: Q14i. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing opportunities to be involved in City government
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 243
Table 80: Q14i. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing opportunities to be involved in City government
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 244
Table 81: Q14j. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Recruiting new businesses and companies to the city
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 346 104 69 173 173 204 62 80 99 22 291 55 73 148 24 174 102 242 63 7 88 13 TOTAL SATISFIED 58 68 81 73 44 70 35 46 76 45 62 38 42 53 21 68 59 58 67 37 62 35 Very satisfied 17 27 19 24 10 22 3 14 26 16 18 8 11 14 2 21 18 16 20 0 20 4 Somewhat satisfied 42 41 62 49 34 48 32 32 49 29 44 30 31 38 19 48 41 42 46 37 42 31 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 20 12 13 12 27 15 37 19 11 36 18 29 30 24 37 14 25 17 18 63 21 54 Somewhat dissatisfied 14 10 3 7 21 11 25 14 5 14 14 17 15 15 32 11 19 12 12 31 16 36 Very dissatisfied 6 2 10 5 6 4 13 5 7 22 4 12 16 9 5 3 6 5 6 32 5 17 NO OPINION/DK/NA 22 20 7 15 29 15 27 36 13 20 20 33 28 23 42 18 16 25 15 0 17 11 No opinion/DK/NA 22 20 7 15 29 15 27 36 13 20 20 33 28 23 42 18 16 25 15 0 17 11 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 245
Table 81: Q14j. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Recruiting new businesses and companies to the city
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 246
Table 81: Q14j. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Recruiting new businesses and companies to the city
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 247
Table 82: Q14k. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Developing policies to support affordable housing
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 346 104 69 173 173 204 62 80 99 22 291 55 73 148 24 174 102 242 63 7 88 13 TOTAL SATISFIED 46 57 58 58 35 56 24 39 57 45 48 36 33 38 31 55 44 47 47 49 44 41 Very satisfied 12 15 23 18 6 14 5 13 16 21 12 12 11 13 10 12 18 10 24 11 20 6 Somewhat satisfied 34 42 35 39 29 42 18 26 41 23 36 23 22 25 20 44 26 38 24 37 25 35 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 30 28 30 29 32 24 54 28 22 49 28 43 41 37 36 24 35 28 32 51 31 59 Somewhat dissatisfied 16 12 19 15 17 15 21 12 15 2 17 10 10 16 25 13 16 16 14 9 14 31 Very dissatisfied 15 16 12 14 15 9 33 16 7 47 11 33 31 20 10 11 19 13 17 43 17 28 NO OPINION/DK/NA 23 15 11 14 33 20 22 33 21 6 24 21 26 25 34 20 21 25 21 0 24 0 No opinion/DK/NA 23 15 11 14 33 20 22 33 21 6 24 21 26 25 34 20 21 25 21 0 24 0 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 248
Table 82: Q14k. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Developing policies to support affordable housing
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

CONTACT METHOD
------------------------------
HS OR
LESS
--------
SOME
COLL
--------
COLL
GRAD
--------
POST-
GRAD
--------
NON-
COLL
--------
COLL+
--------
NCOLL
MEN
--------
NCOLL
WOMEN
--------
COLL+
MEN
--------
COLL+
WOMEN
--------
$0-
$60K
--------
$60K-
$90K
--------
$90K-
$120K
--------
$120K-
$150K
--------
$150K+
--------
PHONE
--------
EMAIL
--------
POST
CARD
--------
Column n-Size 346 70 97 100 62 167 163 72 91 89 73 31 66 73 37 74 173 134 39 TOTAL SATISFIED 46 51 41 53 41 45 48 45 47 45 53 59 49 50 65 28 58 39 21 Very satisfied 12 9 10 13 13 10 13 6 13 11 15 27 15 6 26 7 18 7 3 Somewhat satisfied 34 42 30 40 27 35 35 39 34 33 38 32 34 44 39 21 39 32 17 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 30 25 37 27 26 32 27 33 29 29 24 35 34 25 23 29 29 28 47 Somewhat dissatisfied 16 5 18 19 16 13 18 10 15 16 20 17 23 10 18 13 15 14 25 Very dissatisfied 15 20 19 8 10 19 9 23 14 13 5 18 11 14 5 16 14 14 22 NO OPINION/DK/NA 23 24 22 19 33 23 25 23 23 26 22 6 17 25 12 43 14 33 33 No opinion/DK/NA 23 24 22 19 33 23 25 23 23 26 22 6 17 25 12 43 14 33 33 985
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 249
Table 82: Q14k. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Developing policies to support affordable housing
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENDER BY AGE
-----------------------------------------
MEN
--------
WOMEN
--------
18-29
--------
30-39
--------
40-49
--------
50-64
--------
65-74
--------
75+
--------
18-49
--------
50+
--------
65+
--------
MEN
18-49
--------
MEN
50+
--------
WOMEN
18-49
--------
WOMEN
50+
--------
Column n-Size 346 163 173 69 73 52 83 35 24 194 142 59 93 66 93 76 TOTAL SATISFIED 46 44 51 46 43 57 34 59 68 48 46 62 49 39 50 52 Very satisfied 12 9 16 3 12 8 13 20 38 8 19 27 8 10 8 27 Somewhat satisfied 34 35 35 43 31 49 21 39 30 40 27 35 41 29 42 25 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 30 30 27 36 36 24 34 19 14 33 27 17 30 31 32 23 Somewhat dissatisfied 16 13 17 21 21 10 15 15 3 18 13 10 12 16 22 11 Very dissatisfied 15 17 11 15 15 14 19 4 10 15 14 7 18 16 9 12 NO OPINION/DK/NA 23 25 22 18 21 19 32 23 18 20 27 21 21 29 18 26 No opinion/DK/NA 23 25 22 18 21 19 32 23 18 20 27 21 21 29 18 26 986
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 250
Table 83: Q14l. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing services to people who are homeless Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 346 104 69 173 173 204 62 80 99 22 291 55 73 148 24 174 102 242 63 7 88 13 TOTAL SATISFIED 43 54 57 55 31 49 28 40 48 42 45 33 35 40 24 48 39 45 37 49 39 37 Very satisfied 15 14 35 22 9 18 6 16 21 32 15 15 10 17 4 16 17 15 14 49 14 37 Somewhat satisfied 28 40 22 33 23 31 22 24 27 10 30 17 25 23 20 32 22 30 23 0 24 0 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 31 28 33 30 32 29 52 17 33 48 29 42 35 32 49 27 40 26 44 38 38 52 Somewhat dissatisfied 19 17 22 19 18 21 22 9 27 8 19 15 18 19 26 17 20 18 23 9 19 25 Very dissatisfied 12 10 12 11 13 8 30 8 6 40 9 27 18 13 23 10 20 9 20 29 19 27 NO OPINION/DK/NA 26 19 10 15 37 22 20 43 19 11 26 26 30 28 27 25 21 29 19 13 23 12 No opinion/DK/NA 26 19 10 15 37 22 20 43 19 11 26 26 30 28 27 25 21 29 19 13 23 12 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 251
Table 83: Q14l. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing services to people who are homeless
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

CONTACT METHOD
------------------------------
HS OR
LESS
--------
SOME
COLL
--------
COLL
GRAD
--------
POST-
GRAD
--------
NON-
COLL
--------
COLL+
--------
NCOLL
MEN
--------
NCOLL
WOMEN
--------
COLL+
MEN
--------
COLL+
WOMEN
--------
$0-
$60K
--------
$60K-
$90K
--------
$90K-
$120K
--------
$120K-
$150K
--------
$150K+
--------
PHONE
--------
EMAIL
--------
POST
CARD
--------
Column n-Size 346 70 97 100 62 167 163 72 91 89 73 31 66 73 37 74 173 134 39 TOTAL SATISFIED 43 52 36 54 28 43 44 39 44 43 45 53 52 44 58 29 55 36 14 Very satisfied 15 27 11 18 1 18 11 19 14 12 11 32 16 5 32 5 22 9 6 Somewhat satisfied 28 24 25 36 26 25 33 20 30 31 34 22 36 39 26 24 33 27 8 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 31 29 42 22 28 36 24 38 37 31 17 42 26 34 25 27 30 30 38 Somewhat dissatisfied 19 15 23 17 19 20 18 17 23 21 14 9 20 22 21 19 19 17 23 Very dissatisfied 12 14 19 5 9 17 7 21 14 10 3 33 6 12 4 8 11 13 15 NO OPINION/DK/NA 26 20 22 24 44 21 32 23 19 26 38 5 22 21 17 44 15 34 48 No opinion/DK/NA 26 20 22 24 44 21 32 23 19 26 38 5 22 21 17 44 15 34 48 988
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 252
Table 83: Q14l. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing services to people who are homeless
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENDER BY AGE
-----------------------------------------
MEN
--------
WOMEN
--------
18-29
--------
30-39
--------
40-49
--------
50-64
--------
65-74
--------
75+
--------
18-49
--------
50+
--------
65+
--------
MEN
18-49
--------
MEN
50+
--------
WOMEN
18-49
--------
WOMEN
50+
--------
Column n-Size 346 163 173 69 73 52 83 35 24 194 142 59 93 66 93 76 TOTAL SATISFIED 43 41 45 44 36 51 38 46 63 43 44 53 41 41 45 47 Very satisfied 15 15 15 22 16 5 7 22 43 15 17 31 15 16 13 18 Somewhat satisfied 28 26 30 23 20 46 31 24 19 28 28 22 27 26 32 29 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 31 33 28 37 35 25 33 25 10 33 27 19 36 29 30 25 Somewhat dissatisfied 19 19 18 24 19 13 21 20 8 19 18 15 18 20 19 17 Very dissatisfied 12 15 10 13 15 12 12 6 2 14 9 4 18 10 11 8 NO OPINION/DK/NA 26 26 27 19 29 23 29 28 27 24 28 28 23 29 25 28 No opinion/DK/NA 26 26 27 19 29 23 29 28 27 24 28 28 23 29 25 28 989
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 253
Table 84: Q14m. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Removing blight and illegal dumping Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 346 104 69 173 173 204 62 80 99 22 291 55 73 148 24 174 102 242 63 7 88 13 TOTAL SATISFIED 56 68 71 69 44 65 46 41 75 38 60 34 40 48 55 63 51 59 58 49 53 41 Very satisfied 14 23 24 23 6 16 14 10 25 9 16 8 11 16 8 13 19 13 24 0 20 10 Somewhat satisfied 42 45 47 46 38 49 32 31 50 29 45 26 29 32 47 50 33 46 34 49 33 31 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 26 13 20 15 37 21 41 27 16 23 23 45 34 35 20 19 34 22 31 51 32 49 Somewhat dissatisfied 16 10 16 12 19 16 11 18 12 5 16 16 12 20 11 13 15 16 13 22 14 25 Very dissatisfied 10 2 4 3 18 5 30 10 3 18 7 29 23 15 9 7 19 7 18 29 18 24 NO OPINION/DK/NA 18 20 10 16 20 13 14 32 10 39 17 21 26 17 25 17 14 19 11 0 15 10 No opinion/DK/NA 18 20 10 16 20 13 14 32 10 39 17 21 26 17 25 17 14 19 11 0 15 10 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 254
Table 84: Q14m. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Removing blight and illegal dumping
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 255
Table 84: Q14m. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Removing blight and illegal dumping
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENDER BY AGE
-----------------------------------------
MEN
--------
WOMEN
--------
18-29
--------
30-39
--------
40-49
--------
50-64
--------
65-74
--------
75+
--------
18-49
--------
50+
--------
65+
--------
MEN
18-49
--------
MEN
50+
--------
WOMEN
18-49
--------
WOMEN
50+
--------
Column n-Size 346 163 173 69 73 52 83 35 24 194 142 59 93 66 93 76 TOTAL SATISFIED 56 58 55 57 54 57 52 62 73 56 58 67 59 59 53 57 Very satisfied 14 11 18 6 21 16 10 19 18 14 14 19 12 10 17 17 Somewhat satisfied 42 47 37 51 33 41 41 43 55 42 44 48 47 49 36 40 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 26 23 28 18 22 32 35 21 21 23 29 21 18 29 27 29 Somewhat dissatisfied 16 15 17 15 8 27 19 15 4 16 16 11 14 16 19 15 Very dissatisfied 10 8 11 2 14 4 16 5 16 7 14 10 4 12 8 14 NO OPINION/DK/NA 18 19 17 25 24 12 13 17 6 21 13 13 23 12 20 13 No opinion/DK/NA 18 19 17 25 24 12 13 17 6 21 13 13 23 12 20 13 992
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 256
Table 85: Q14n. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Enforcing traffic laws to protect the safety of pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 77 77 88 81 72 86 56 69 79 52 80 63 55 71 70 83 68 83 76 23 70 71 Very satisfied 25 25 28 26 23 26 22 22 42 9 25 25 24 29 22 22 19 28 32 0 24 0 Somewhat satisfied 52 52 60 55 49 60 34 47 38 43 55 38 31 42 48 61 49 55 44 23 46 71 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 12 13 7 10 14 7 32 10 11 45 8 33 31 19 23 4 18 9 13 77 12 29 Somewhat dissatisfied 9 12 2 8 11 6 24 6 11 33 6 24 14 13 21 4 13 7 8 15 10 14 Very dissatisfied 3 1 5 3 3 1 8 4 0 12 1 10 17 6 2 1 5 2 5 61 3 15 NO OPINION/DK/NA 11 10 6 8 14 7 12 21 10 3 12 4 14 10 7 13 15 8 11 0 18 0 No opinion/DK/NA 11 10 6 8 14 7 12 21 10 3 12 4 14 10 7 13 15 8 11 0 18 0 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 257
Table 85: Q14n. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Enforcing traffic laws to protect the safety of pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 258
Table 85: Q14n. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Enforcing traffic laws to protect the safety of pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 259
Table 86: Q14o. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing afterschool programs for young people
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 60 72 74 73 47 69 48 46 73 65 62 51 52 59 37 67 58 63 57 58 57 74 Very satisfied 21 31 24 28 14 21 24 19 29 25 21 25 24 28 7 20 24 20 24 15 25 22 Somewhat satisfied 39 41 50 45 33 48 24 27 44 40 42 26 28 31 30 48 34 43 33 43 32 52 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 13 14 12 13 14 12 19 13 9 18 13 16 18 17 26 8 16 12 13 27 15 9 Somewhat dissatisfied 10 12 10 12 8 10 10 9 9 5 10 10 12 14 19 5 10 10 7 0 9 0 Very dissatisfied 4 1 2 1 6 2 9 4 0 13 3 6 6 3 7 3 6 2 6 27 6 9 NO OPINION/DK/NA 26 15 13 14 39 18 33 42 18 17 25 33 30 24 37 25 26 25 30 15 29 17 No opinion/DK/NA 26 15 13 14 39 18 33 42 18 17 25 33 30 24 37 25 26 25 30 15 29 17 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 260
Table 86: Q14o. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing afterschool programs for young people
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 261
Table 86: Q14o. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing afterschool programs for young people
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 262
Table 87: Q14p. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Maintaining the sewer and wastewater system Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 71 72 91 80 62 79 56 64 82 24 74 60 65 70 58 76 62 78 67 39 62 75 Very satisfied 26 33 29 31 21 31 22 17 49 3 27 23 24 30 24 23 23 28 33 24 27 8 Somewhat satisfied 45 39 63 49 42 48 34 47 33 22 47 37 41 40 33 53 39 50 34 15 35 67 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 15 22 7 16 15 12 29 13 10 66 11 34 19 15 27 12 22 11 14 61 20 23 Somewhat dissatisfied 11 16 6 12 10 8 17 12 6 50 9 22 12 9 19 10 14 9 5 34 11 17 Very dissatisfied 4 6 2 4 5 3 12 2 5 16 3 12 7 7 8 2 8 2 9 27 8 7 NO OPINION/DK/NA 14 7 1 4 23 9 15 23 8 10 15 6 16 14 15 12 16 11 20 0 18 2 No opinion/DK/NA 14 7 1 4 23 9 15 23 8 10 15 6 16 14 15 12 16 11 20 0 18 2 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 263
Table 87: Q14p. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Maintaining the sewer and wastewater system
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 264
Table 87: Q14p. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Maintaining the sewer and wastewater system
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 265
Table 88: Q14q. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Supporting a diverse range of arts and cultural activities
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 57 66 75 70 45 67 52 38 74 55 60 46 54 56 35 65 50 63 56 58 50 57 Very satisfied 20 26 31 28 12 21 26 14 39 23 19 26 18 25 15 18 22 20 30 15 26 4 Somewhat satisfied 37 40 44 42 33 46 26 24 35 32 41 20 36 31 20 47 28 43 26 43 24 53 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 17 20 10 15 19 18 14 17 12 22 16 25 17 20 27 12 25 13 14 27 21 35 Somewhat dissatisfied 14 16 8 12 16 15 10 14 9 12 13 21 14 18 14 11 18 12 14 0 18 26 Very dissatisfied 3 4 2 3 3 3 4 3 3 10 3 4 3 2 12 1 7 1 0 27 4 9 NO OPINION/DK/NA 25 14 15 15 36 15 34 44 14 23 24 29 29 25 38 23 25 24 30 15 29 8 No opinion/DK/NA 25 14 15 15 36 15 34 44 14 23 24 29 29 25 38 23 25 24 30 15 29 8 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 266
Table 88: Q14q. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Supporting a diverse range of arts and cultural activities
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 267
Table 88: Q14q. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Supporting a diverse range of arts and cultural activities
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENDER BY AGE
-----------------------------------------
MEN
--------
WOMEN
--------
18-29
--------
30-39
--------
40-49
--------
50-64
--------
65-74
--------
75+
--------
18-49
--------
50+
--------
65+
--------
MEN
18-49
--------
MEN
50+
--------
WOMEN
18-49
--------
WOMEN
50+
--------
Column n-Size 347 163 174 69 73 52 83 35 24 194 142 59 94 66 95 75 TOTAL SATISFIED 57 59 58 64 43 54 68 55 57 54 63 56 57 61 53 65 Very satisfied 20 18 23 33 18 18 18 12 14 23 16 13 20 15 28 17 Somewhat satisfied 37 41 35 31 25 36 50 43 43 30 47 43 38 46 25 48 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 17 21 14 20 24 7 20 10 13 18 16 11 21 21 15 12 Somewhat dissatisfied 14 17 12 15 22 7 16 9 4 15 12 7 19 16 12 10 Very dissatisfied 3 4 3 6 2 0 4 1 9 3 4 4 3 5 3 3
NO OPINION/DK/NA 25 20 28 15 32 39 13 35 30 28 21 33 21 18 32 23 No opinion/DK/NA 25 20 28 15 32 39 13 35 30 28 21 33 21 18 32 23 1004
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 268
Table 89: Q14r. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Attracting new employers and jobs to the city Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 55 59 70 64 46 66 38 40 71 16 58 38 52 52 38 61 41 63 42 66 39 56 Very satisfied 12 17 13 15 8 12 17 7 23 6 11 16 11 14 10 10 11 12 15 0 12 6 Somewhat satisfied 43 42 57 49 37 54 21 34 48 10 48 22 42 38 29 51 30 51 27 66 27 51 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 20 25 18 22 17 15 34 21 17 66 16 38 18 20 48 12 28 15 22 34 25 33 Somewhat dissatisfied 16 23 13 19 13 14 18 19 17 42 14 26 16 18 31 10 23 12 20 34 19 32 Very dissatisfied 4 2 5 3 4 1 15 3 0 25 2 12 2 2 17 1 4 3 2 0 5 1 NO OPINION/DK/NA 26 16 12 14 37 20 28 38 13 18 26 24 30 28 14 27 31 22 36 0 36 10 No opinion/DK/NA 26 16 12 14 37 20 28 38 13 18 26 24 30 28 14 27 31 22 36 0 36 10 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 269
Table 89: Q14r. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Attracting new employers and jobs to the city
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 270
Table 89: Q14r. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Attracting new employers and jobs to the city
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 271
Table 90: Q14s. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Keeping the community informed about important City programs
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 66 74 78 76 57 75 44 62 85 28 71 46 55 66 56 70 57 73 69 24 59 46 Very satisfied 17 18 29 22 11 21 11 10 32 6 18 12 16 16 12 19 18 17 26 0 22 1 Somewhat satisfied 50 57 50 54 45 54 33 52 54 22 53 34 39 49 44 51 39 56 44 24 37 45 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 22 23 19 21 22 17 42 18 5 51 17 45 28 21 36 19 29 17 16 61 25 50 Somewhat dissatisfied 16 15 15 15 18 14 30 11 5 31 13 31 24 17 22 15 21 14 8 34 16 43 Very dissatisfied 5 8 5 6 4 3 12 6 0 19 4 13 5 4 13 4 8 3 9 27 9 7 NO OPINION/DK/NA 12 3 2 3 21 8 14 20 9 22 12 9 17 14 8 11 14 10 15 15 16 4 No opinion/DK/NA 12 3 2 3 21 8 14 20 9 22 12 9 17 14 8 11 14 10 15 15 16 4 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 272
Table 90: Q14s. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Keeping the community informed about important City programs
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 273
Table 90: Q14s. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Keeping the community informed about important City programs
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 274
Table 91: Q14t. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing programs that celebrate diversity and inclusion of different cultures
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 64 70 77 73 55 74 53 46 80 44 66 53 53 64 46 68 59 67 74 58 59 55 Very satisfied 17 24 21 23 11 17 19 13 33 14 17 16 15 17 12 18 16 17 29 15 19 5 Somewhat satisfied 47 46 56 50 44 57 34 33 47 30 50 37 38 48 34 50 43 50 45 43 40 50 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 13 17 14 16 11 12 14 15 9 20 12 17 9 9 20 14 17 11 4 27 14 35 Somewhat dissatisfied 10 14 5 10 10 10 12 9 8 15 9 15 6 5 15 13 11 9 2 0 13 3 Very dissatisfied 3 3 8 5 1 3 1 6 1 5 4 2 3 5 6 2 6 2 2 27 1 32 NO OPINION/DK/NA 23 13 9 11 35 14 33 39 12 35 21 31 38 27 34 17 23 22 22 15 26 10 No opinion/DK/NA 23 13 9 11 35 14 33 39 12 35 21 31 38 27 34 17 23 22 22 15 26 10 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 275
Table 91: Q14t. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing programs that celebrate diversity and inclusion of different cultures
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 276
Table 91: Q14t. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing programs that celebrate diversity and inclusion of different cultures
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 277
Table 92: Q14u. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Assisting new businesses in obtaining required permits and licenses
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 53 58 78 66 41 63 36 43 64 32 56 43 57 56 23 59 48 57 44 100 42 83 Very satisfied 14 19 24 21 7 18 9 7 32 0 15 9 15 11 8 18 10 16 16 0 11 6 Somewhat satisfied 39 39 53 45 34 44 27 36 32 32 41 34 41 45 15 42 38 41 28 100 31 77 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 9 15 6 11 7 6 21 8 6 39 7 18 13 11 22 5 12 7 5 0 11 7 Somewhat dissatisfied 7 13 4 9 5 6 13 6 6 18 6 10 13 9 13 4 9 6 2 0 7 5 Very dissatisfied 2 2 2 2 2 0 8 2 0 21 1 7 0 2 9 1 4 1 3 0 5 1 NO OPINION/DK/NA 38 27 16 23 53 32 43 49 30 28 37 40 30 34 55 36 40 35 51 0 47 10 No opinion/DK/NA 38 27 16 23 53 32 43 49 30 28 37 40 30 34 55 36 40 35 51 0 47 10 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 278
Table 92: Q14u. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Assisting new businesses in obtaining required permits and licenses
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 279
Table 92: Q14u. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Assisting new businesses in obtaining required permits and licenses
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 280
Table 93: Q14v. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Developing programs that promote sustainable living, such as clean energy, water conservation, and recycling Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 57 59 72 64 51 63 42 55 68 39 58 54 56 54 39 65 47 64 42 85 46 56 Very satisfied 21 26 31 28 14 21 23 19 31 14 21 21 23 27 11 18 21 21 27 15 22 22 Somewhat satisfied 37 33 41 36 37 42 19 37 37 25 37 33 32 27 28 47 25 43 15 70 24 34 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 24 32 20 27 21 24 38 13 19 41 23 28 16 23 41 20 34 19 35 0 31 40 Somewhat dissatisfied 20 25 18 22 18 20 30 12 12 35 20 24 16 20 31 18 28 16 33 0 28 34 Very dissatisfied 3 7 2 5 2 3 7 1 7 6 4 3 0 3 10 2 6 2 2 0 3 6 NO OPINION/DK/NA 19 9 9 9 29 13 21 32 13 20 19 18 28 23 19 15 20 17 23 15 23 4 No opinion/DK/NA 19 9 9 9 29 13 21 32 13 20 19 18 28 23 19 15 20 17 23 15 23 4 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 281
Table 93: Q14v. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Developing programs that promote sustainable living, such as clean energy, water conservation, and recycling Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 282
Table 93: Q14v. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Developing programs that promote sustainable living, such as clean energy, water conservation, and recycling Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENDER BY AGE
-----------------------------------------
MEN
--------
WOMEN
--------
18-29
--------
30-39
--------
40-49
--------
50-64
--------
65-74
--------
75+
--------
18-49
--------
50+
--------
65+
--------
MEN
18-49
--------
MEN
50+
--------
WOMEN
18-49
--------
WOMEN
50+
--------
Column n-Size 347 163 174 69 73 52 83 35 24 194 142 59 94 66 95 75 TOTAL SATISFIED 57 57 58 54 43 56 67 66 78 50 68 71 48 71 52 67 Very satisfied 21 15 27 25 18 19 20 18 30 21 21 23 17 13 26 29 Somewhat satisfied 37 42 31 28 25 37 47 48 48 29 47 48 31 58 27 37 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 24 26 21 28 36 18 18 19 4 28 16 13 34 13 22 19 Somewhat dissatisfied 20 22 18 21 34 15 17 13 4 24 14 9 30 10 18 17 Very dissatisfied 3 4 3 7 2 2 2 6 0 4 2 3 4 3 4 2
NO OPINION/DK/NA 19 17 21 19 21 26 15 15 18 22 16 17 18 16 26 15 No opinion/DK/NA 19 17 21 19 21 26 15 15 18 22 16 17 18 16 26 15 1019
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 283
Table 94: Q14w. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing emergency 911 and fire response Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 84 92 95 93 74 87 81 78 84 67 85 81 89 90 75 82 82 86 82 100 81 98 Very satisfied 40 45 39 43 38 41 36 41 54 19 41 38 59 48 27 37 42 39 57 61 48 19 Somewhat satisfied 44 47 56 51 37 46 45 37 30 49 44 43 30 41 47 45 40 46 25 39 33 79 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 3 5 1 3 3 3 6 0 4 15 2 6 1 1 11 3 5 2 2 0 3 0 Somewhat dissatisfied 3 4 1 3 3 3 6 0 4 15 2 6 1 0 11 3 4 2 2 0 2 0 Very dissatisfied 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 NO OPINION/DK/NA 13 2 4 3 23 10 12 22 12 18 13 13 10 10 14 16 13 12 15 0 16 2 No opinion/DK/NA 13 2 4 3 23 10 12 22 12 18 13 13 10 10 14 16 13 12 15 0 16 2 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 284
Table 94: Q14w. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing emergency 911 and fire response
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 285
Table 94: Q14w. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing emergency 911 and fire response
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 286
Table 95: Q14x. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing rent relief to prevent residents from becoming homeless
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 347 100 73 173 173 205 62 80 84 14 282 62 46 136 44 168 120 222 57 5 96 20 TOTAL SATISFIED 45 59 61 60 31 50 33 43 56 42 47 37 40 43 28 52 34 52 36 9 40 10 Very satisfied 16 25 23 24 8 16 18 15 25 23 16 17 15 18 8 16 15 17 15 9 17 9 Somewhat satisfied 29 34 39 36 23 34 15 28 31 19 31 19 24 25 20 35 19 36 21 0 24 1 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 23 25 28 27 20 26 33 8 16 13 22 31 22 24 41 18 33 19 25 42 21 77 Somewhat dissatisfied 15 18 17 18 12 18 21 2 11 9 14 21 9 14 29 12 24 11 19 15 16 50 Very dissatisfied 8 8 11 9 8 8 12 6 5 3 8 9 13 10 12 6 9 8 6 27 5 27 NO OPINION/DK/NA 31 16 10 14 49 24 34 49 27 46 31 33 38 32 31 30 33 29 39 49 38 12 No opinion/DK/NA 31 16 10 14 49 24 34 49 27 46 31 33 38 32 31 30 33 29 39 49 38 12 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 287
Table 95: Q14x. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing rent relief to prevent residents from becoming homeless
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 288
Table 95: Q14x. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. This time, after I mention each one, please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: Providing rent relief to prevent residents from becoming homeless
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENDER BY AGE
-----------------------------------------
MEN
--------
WOMEN
--------
18-29
--------
30-39
--------
40-49
--------
50-64
--------
65-74
--------
75+
--------
18-49
--------
50+
--------
65+
--------
MEN
18-49
--------
MEN
50+
--------
WOMEN
18-49
--------
WOMEN
50+
--------
Column n-Size 347 163 174 69 73 52 83 35 24 194 142 59 94 66 95 75 TOTAL SATISFIED 45 47 45 49 35 37 53 48 55 40 52 51 42 53 41 52 Very satisfied 16 11 21 24 15 11 16 10 12 17 14 11 11 10 24 17 Somewhat satisfied 29 36 25 25 20 26 37 38 43 23 38 40 31 43 17 34 TOTAL DISSATISFIED 23 23 24 31 34 17 19 15 8 28 16 12 29 14 29 18 Somewhat dissatisfied 15 16 14 17 21 12 12 14 8 17 12 12 20 11 14 13 Very dissatisfied 8 7 10 14 13 5 7 1 0 11 4 0 9 3 14 5
NO OPINION/DK/NA 31 30 30 20 32 46 28 37 36 31 32 37 29 33 31 30 No opinion/DK/NA 31 30 30 20 32 46 28 37 36 31 32 37 29 33 31 30 1025
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 289
Table 96: Q16. CONTACT WITH CITY
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 290
Table 96: Q16. CONTACT WITH CITY
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 291
Table 97: Q17. CITY CONTACT SATISFACTION
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 292
Table 97: Q17. CITY CONTACT SATISFACTION
Total
--------

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 293
Table 98: Q19. YEARS LIVED IN MILPITAS
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 693 204 142 346 346 409 125 159 183 36 573 117 119 283 68 341 222 464 119 12 184 33 <11 YEARS 32 45 22 36 27 37 19 29 29 14 34 18 16 26 61 30 36 29 34 18 35 36 Two years or less 5 7 2 5 6 6 2 5 3 0 6 4 5 3 8 7 5 5 8 0 6 3 Three to four years 8 13 3 9 6 9 6 4 5 2 8 7 2 4 32 5 8 7 4 0 8 0 Five to six years 8 7 7 7 8 7 4 10 7 5 8 4 3 8 10 6 13 5 12 7 13 14 Seven to ten years 11 18 10 15 7 13 6 9 14 7 12 4 6 10 11 12 10 11 10 11 9 19 11-20 YEARS 25 31 27 30 21 25 29 24 26 34 24 32 22 23 19 28 15 30 16 5 17 7 11 to 15 years 12 18 9 15 9 11 18 9 9 31 10 18 12 11 11 13 8 14 7 0 9 5 16 to 20 years 13 13 18 15 12 14 11 15 17 3 13 13 10 12 8 16 7 17 9 5 8 2 21-40 YEARS 33 21 34 26 39 32 34 34 34 45 32 38 37 35 17 34 34 32 33 67 32 49 21 to 30 years 21 15 22 18 23 22 20 18 26 30 20 23 23 21 16 21 20 20 19 55 17 40 31 to 40 years 12 5 12 8 16 10 14 16 8 15 12 15 15 14 1 13 13 12 14 11 14 9 41+ YEARS 11 3 16 8 13 7 19 14 11 7 10 12 24 17 3 7 15 9 17 10 16 8 41 years or more 11 3 16 8 13 7 19 14 11 7 10 12 24 17 3 7 15 9 17 10 16 8 DK/REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DK/Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1030
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 294
Table 98: Q19. YEARS LIVED IN MILPITAS
Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

A/B SPLIT
-------------------
VERY
SAT
--------
VERY
DSSAT
--------
TOTAL
SAT
--------
TOTAL
DSSAT
--------
YES
--------
NO
--------
VERY
SAT
--------
NT AT
ALL
--------
TOTAL
SAT
--------
TOTAL
NOT
--------
<11
YEARS
--------
11-20
YEARS
--------
21-30
YEARS
--------
31-40
YEARS
--------
41+
YEARS
--------
OWN
--------
RENT
--------
A
--------
B
--------
Column n-Size 693 157 26 554 92 223 436 95 18 174 49 218 174 143 84 73 481 160 346 347 <11 YEARS 32 25 8 32 20 37 29 33 34 37 33 100 0 0 0 0 26 49 30 33 Two years or less 5 2 4 4 5 4 6 7 0 5 2 17 0 0 0 0 3 15 5 6 Three to four years 8 7 0 8 5 11 6 6 6 10 17 24 0 0 0 0 6 16 7 8 Five to six years 8 7 4 8 4 6 8 4 18 6 8 24 0 0 0 0 9 4 8 8 Seven to ten years 11 9 0 11 7 15 10 15 11 17 7 35 0 0 0 0 9 15 11 10 11-20 YEARS 25 30 12 27 21 15 31 13 19 14 17 0 100 0 0 0 26 24 26 24 11 to 15 years 12 6 8 12 13 8 14 7 19 7 14 0 47 0 0 0 12 12 13 11 16 to 20 years 13 24 4 14 9 6 17 7 0 7 3 0 53 0 0 0 14 12 13 14 21-40 YEARS 33 36 59 32 44 34 32 35 41 33 38 0 0 100 100 0 35 24 31 34 21 to 30 years 21 25 41 20 28 20 21 23 28 20 21 0 0 100 0 0 20 18 20 21 31 to 40 years 12 11 17 11 16 14 11 12 13 13 17 0 0 0 100 0 14 6 11 14 41+ YEARS 11 9 21 10 14 15 8 20 5 16 11 0 0 0 0 100 13 3 12 9 41 years or more 11 9 21 10 14 15 8 20 5 16 11 0 0 0 0 100 13 3 12 9 DK/REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
DK/Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
1031
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 295
Table 98: Q19. YEARS LIVED IN MILPITAS
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

INTERVIEW
------------------------------
YES/
<19
@ HME
--------
YES/
NT @
HOME
--------
HAVE
CHLDN
--------
NO
CHLDN
--------
DADS
--------
MOMS
--------
MEN
W/NO
CHLDN
--------
WOMEN
W/NO
CHLDN
--------
WHITE
--------
LATNO
--------
CHNSE
--------
FLPNO
--------
INDN
--------
VTNMS
--------
TOTAL
ASIAN
--------
PPLE
OF CLR
--------
ENGLS
--------
SPNSH
--------
VTNM
/CHNS
--------
Column n-Size 693 188 164 352 307 167 181 145 153 97 90 97 83 91 97 388 550 655 17 21 <11 YEARS 32 44 13 30 34 33 28 38 30 29 31 28 29 48 24 31 32 32 28 33 Two years or less 5 9 2 6 6 5 6 7 4 9 5 5 3 10 3 5 5 6 11 0 Three to four years 8 12 4 9 7 12 6 5 6 7 6 4 9 11 6 7 8 8 0 3 Five to six years 8 11 2 7 7 6 8 6 9 7 6 5 7 10 3 6 6 8 2 0 Seven to ten years 11 12 4 8 14 10 7 19 11 5 14 15 10 17 11 13 13 10 16 29 11-20 YEARS 25 30 15 23 28 26 20 26 31 16 23 27 27 28 35 30 28 25 23 25 11 to 15 years 12 12 7 10 15 10 9 11 19 3 11 14 7 10 23 14 13 12 2 20 16 to 20 years 13 18 9 14 13 16 11 14 12 12 13 14 20 17 12 16 15 13 21 5 21-40 YEARS 33 22 47 34 31 32 35 32 30 29 31 36 39 24 39 34 33 32 34 39 21 to 30 years 21 15 24 19 22 21 17 23 22 14 24 23 23 21 21 22 22 21 28 16 31 to 40 years 12 7 23 15 9 11 18 9 8 15 7 13 15 3 18 13 12 12 6 23 41+ YEARS 11 3 25 13 7 10 17 4 9 27 14 8 5 0 3 5 7 11 15 4 41 years or more 11 3 25 13 7 10 17 4 9 27 14 8 5 0 3 5 7 11 15 4 DK/REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DK/Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1032
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 296
Table 98: Q19. YEARS LIVED IN MILPITAS
Total
--------

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

CONTACT METHOD
------------------------------
HS OR
LESS
--------
SOME
COLL
--------
COLL
GRAD
--------
POST-
GRAD
--------
NON-
COLL
--------
COLL+
--------
NCOLL
MEN
--------
NCOLL
WOMEN
--------
COLL+
MEN
--------
COLL+
WOMEN
--------
$0-
$60K
--------
$60K-
$90K
--------
$90K-
$120K
--------
$120K-
$150K
--------
$150K+
--------
PHONE
--------
EMAIL
--------
POST
CARD
--------
Column n-Size 693 147 194 201 125 341 326 154 178 169 155 70 125 153 70 155 346 266 81 <11 YEARS 32 31 26 29 47 28 35 28 28 39 31 32 28 25 26 45 36 20 51 Two years or less 5 1 7 4 13 4 7 3 4 8 6 3 4 3 10 8 5 4 13 Three to four years 8 10 6 5 12 8 8 7 8 10 4 9 8 2 2 16 9 4 12 Five to six years 8 7 5 7 12 6 9 3 9 8 9 2 6 9 3 11 7 5 17 Seven to ten years 11 13 8 13 10 10 12 15 7 12 12 17 11 11 10 11 15 6 9 11-20 YEARS 25 32 30 23 17 31 21 32 30 21 20 24 34 36 17 16 30 22 15 11 to 15 years 12 9 16 11 12 13 11 11 15 10 12 9 18 17 8 9 15 10 6 16 to 20 years 13 23 14 12 5 18 9 21 15 11 8 15 16 19 10 7 15 13 9 21-40 YEARS 33 25 29 44 31 27 39 29 26 35 43 22 33 31 34 32 26 42 30 21 to 30 years 21 14 18 26 24 16 25 19 14 24 27 18 24 16 18 23 18 23 25 31 to 40 years 12 11 11 18 7 11 14 10 12 11 17 4 10 15 16 9 8 19 5 41+ YEARS 11 11 15 5 5 13 5 11 16 5 5 22 4 8 22 7 8 15 4 41 years or more 11 11 15 5 5 13 5 11 16 5 5 22 4 8 22 7 8 15 4 DK/REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DK/Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENDER BY AGE
-----------------------------------------
MEN
--------
WOMEN
--------
18-29
--------
30-39
--------
40-49
--------
50-64
--------
65-74
--------
75+
--------
18-49
--------
50+
--------
65+
--------
MEN
18-49
--------
MEN
50+
--------
WOMEN
18-49
--------
WOMEN
50+
--------
Column n-Size 693 326 346 139 146 104 166 69 49 388 284 118 187 132 187 151 <11 YEARS 32 34 28 39 56 38 15 12 13 45 14 12 48 12 40 16 Two years or less 5 6 5 8 11 4 2 3 2 8 2 3 7 4 8 1
Three to four years 8 9 6 14 13 8 2 0 1 12 2 1 14 2 10 1 Five to six years 8 6 9 3 19 7 4 2 10 10 5 5 8 3 11 6
Seven to ten years 11 14 9 14 13 19 6 7 0 15 5 4 20 3 11 7 11-20 YEARS 25 26 25 25 23 33 34 13 5 26 24 10 26 28 28 20 11 to 15 years 12 10 13 8 14 17 15 4 4 13 10 4 12 9 14 12 16 to 20 years 13 16 11 17 9 16 19 9 1 13 13 6 14 19 13 9 21-40 YEARS 33 32 33 37 21 25 40 48 23 28 39 38 25 42 30 37 21 to 30 years 21 22 20 36 12 14 22 17 12 21 19 15 19 26 25 13 31 to 40 years 12 11 13 0 9 10 18 31 11 6 20 23 6 16 5 23 41+ YEARS 11 8 13 0 0 4 11 27 58 1 23 40 0 19 2 28
41 years or more 11 8 13 0 0 4 11 27 58 1 23 40 0 19 2 28 DK/REFUSED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DK/Refused 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1033
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 297
Table 99: Q20. CHILDREN
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 298
Table 99: Q20. CHILDREN
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 299
Table 100: Q21. RESIDENCE
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 300
Table 100: Q21. RESIDENCE
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 301
Table 101: Q22. INCOME
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 693 204 142 346 346 409 125 159 183 36 573 117 119 283 68 341 222 464 119 12 184 33 $0-$60K 10 15 13 14 6 11 9 7 11 9 10 12 12 12 8 9 16 7 19 32 16 15 $30,000 and under 3 4 5 4 2 4 2 1 4 0 3 2 5 5 0 2 5 2 7 0 5 3 $30,001 - $60,000 7 11 8 10 4 7 7 6 7 9 6 10 7 7 8 6 11 5 12 32 11 12 $60K-$90K 18 26 24 25 11 18 16 19 21 15 19 13 12 15 11 22 17 19 13 7 15 25 $60,001 - $90,000 18 26 24 25 11 18 16 19 21 15 19 13 12 15 11 22 17 19 13 7 15 25 $90K-$120K 22 27 28 28 17 25 19 18 31 22 23 17 17 19 12 26 14 26 8 11 13 19 $90,001 - $120,000 22 27 28 28 17 25 19 18 31 22 23 17 17 19 12 26 14 26 8 11 13 19 $120K-$150K 10 8 16 11 9 10 12 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 9 10 12 9 12 5 12 12 $120,001 - $150,000 10 8 16 11 9 10 12 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 9 10 12 9 12 5 12 12 $150K+ 22 18 7 13 31 23 23 20 17 12 22 23 25 24 53 15 25 21 29 34 24 20 $150,001 - $180,000 6 6 0 3 8 5 7 7 6 0 6 4 12 8 13 2 6 5 6 12 6 6 More than $180,000 17 12 7 10 23 18 16 13 11 12 16 18 13 16 40 13 18 16 23 22 18 14 REFUSED 17 6 12 9 26 12 21 27 10 32 15 26 25 19 8 17 17 17 19 11 19 10 Refused 17 6 12 9 26 12 21 27 10 32 15 26 25 19 8 17 17 17 19 11 19 10 1038
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 302
Table 101: Q22. INCOME
Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

A/B SPLIT
-------------------
VERY
SAT
--------
VERY
DSSAT
--------
TOTAL
SAT
--------
TOTAL
DSSAT
--------
YES
--------
NO
--------
VERY
SAT
--------
NT AT
ALL
--------
TOTAL
SAT
--------
TOTAL
NOT
--------
<11
YEARS
--------
11-20
YEARS
--------
21-30
YEARS
--------
31-40
YEARS
--------
41+
YEARS
--------
OWN
--------
RENT
--------
A
--------
B
--------
Column n-Size 693 157 26 554 92 223 436 95 18 174 49 218 174 143 84 73 481 160 346 347 $0-$60K 10 14 16 11 9 10 10 16 3 12 2 10 10 9 4 21 6 21 9 11 $30,000 and under 3 3 8 3 3 4 3 6 0 5 0 2 2 3 2 8 2 5 3 3 $30,001 - $60,000 7 11 8 7 6 6 7 10 3 7 2 8 7 5 1 13 4 16 6 8 $60K-$90K 18 23 8 20 11 14 20 14 4 17 5 16 25 21 15 7 16 29 19 17 $60,001 - $90,000 18 23 8 20 11 14 20 14 4 17 5 16 25 21 15 7 16 29 19 17 $90K-$120K 22 24 25 24 17 11 29 12 7 11 11 18 32 17 27 17 27 14 21 23 $90,001 - $120,000 22 24 25 24 17 11 29 12 7 11 11 18 32 17 27 17 27 14 21 23 $120K-$150K 10 9 1 10 4 10 11 11 9 11 7 8 7 9 13 21 12 8 11 9 $120,001 - $150,000 10 9 1 10 4 10 11 11 9 11 7 8 7 9 13 21 12 8 11 9 $150K+ 22 16 27 21 30 31 18 32 26 27 43 32 14 25 17 15 25 17 22 23 $150,001 - $180,000 6 6 5 6 4 7 6 6 0 7 7 6 5 9 2 6 5 7 5 6 More than $180,000 17 11 22 15 26 24 13 26 26 20 36 26 10 16 15 9 20 10 16 17 REFUSED 17 13 23 15 29 24 13 14 50 22 31 15 13 20 25 19 15 12 19 16 Refused 17 13 23 15 29 24 13 14 50 22 31 15 13 20 25 19 15 12 19 16 1039
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 303
Table 101: Q22. INCOME
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

INTERVIEW
------------------------------
YES/
<19
@ HME
--------
YES/
NT @
HOME
--------
HAVE
CHLDN
--------
NO
CHLDN
--------
DADS
--------
MOMS
--------
MEN
W/NO
CHLDN
--------
WOMEN
W/NO
CHLDN
--------
WHITE
--------
LATNO
--------
CHNSE
--------
FLPNO
--------
INDN
--------
VTNMS
--------
TOTAL
ASIAN
--------
PPLE
OF CLR
--------
ENGLS
--------
SPNSH
--------
VTNM
/CHNS
--------
Column n-Size 693 188 164 352 307 167 181 145 153 97 90 97 83 91 97 388 550 655 17 21 $0-$60K 10 1 10 5 15 5 6 17 12 10 19 16 7 7 6 9 10 10 15 19 $30,000 and under 3 1 4 2 4 2 3 5 3 3 3 8 2 0 3 3 3 3 0 9 $30,001 - $60,000 7 1 6 3 11 3 4 13 9 7 15 8 5 7 3 6 7 7 15 10 $60K-$90K 18 18 11 15 24 13 17 27 21 16 19 16 25 17 25 20 20 18 8 19 $60,001 - $90,000 18 18 11 15 24 13 17 27 21 16 19 16 25 17 25 20 20 18 8 19 $90K-$120K 22 20 26 23 23 27 19 18 30 17 26 26 25 16 24 22 23 21 40 28 $90,001 - $120,000 22 20 26 23 23 27 19 18 30 17 26 26 25 16 24 22 23 21 40 28 $120K-$150K 10 11 17 14 7 12 16 6 7 10 11 8 12 6 11 10 11 10 23 4 $120,001 - $150,000 10 11 17 14 7 12 16 6 7 10 11 8 12 6 11 10 11 10 23 4 $150K+ 22 38 20 30 15 33 27 20 11 28 18 26 11 41 16 24 22 23 13 14 $150,001 - $180,000 6 7 5 6 5 5 7 5 5 9 11 4 4 7 1 4 5 6 11 4 More than $180,000 17 31 15 23 10 28 20 15 6 19 7 22 7 35 15 20 17 17 3 9 REFUSED 17 12 15 13 15 10 15 11 18 19 8 9 21 13 19 14 14 18 0 16 Refused 17 12 15 13 15 10 15 11 18 19 8 9 21 13 19 14 14 18 0 16 1040
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 304
Table 101: Q22. INCOME
Total
--------

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

CONTACT METHOD
------------------------------
HS OR
LESS
--------
SOME
COLL
--------
COLL
GRAD
--------
POST-
GRAD
--------
NON-
COLL
--------
COLL+
--------
NCOLL
MEN
--------
NCOLL
WOMEN
--------
COLL+
MEN
--------
COLL+
WOMEN
--------
$0-
$60K
--------
$60K-
$90K
--------
$90K-
$120K
--------
$120K-
$150K
--------
$150K+
--------
PHONE
--------
EMAIL
--------
POST
CARD
--------
Column n-Size 693 147 194 201 125 341 326 154 178 169 155 70 125 153 70 155 346 266 81 $0-$60K 10 17 13 7 5 14 7 17 11 6 7 100 0 0 0 0 14 7 5
$30,000 and under 3 6 3 2 2 4 2 4 3 2 3 31 0 0 0 0 4 1 4 $30,001 - $60,000 7 11 10 5 3 10 4 13 8 4 4 69 0 0 0 0 10 5 1 $60K-$90K 18 21 18 23 11 19 18 25 15 13 24 0 100 0 0 0 25 14 4 $60,001 - $90,000 18 21 18 23 11 19 18 25 15 13 24 0 100 0 0 0 25 14 4 $90K-$120K 22 24 30 19 14 28 18 26 31 19 16 0 0 100 0 0 28 18 12 $90,001 - $120,000 22 24 30 19 14 28 18 26 31 19 16 0 0 100 0 0 28 18 12 $120K-$150K 10 8 14 8 7 12 7 11 12 7 7 0 0 0 100 0 11 10 5 $120,001 - $150,000 10 8 14 8 7 12 7 11 12 7 7 0 0 0 100 0 11 10 5 $150K+ 22 11 13 26 50 12 35 9 15 43 26 0 0 0 0 100 13 28 41 $150,001 - $180,000 6 3 6 7 6 5 7 4 6 7 7 0 0 0 0 26 3 9 6 More than $180,000 17 8 6 18 44 7 28 5 9 36 19 0 0 0 0 74 10 20 35 REFUSED 17 18 13 17 13 15 16 12 16 12 19 0 0 0 0 0 9 23 34 Refused 17 18 13 17 13 15 16 12 16 12 19 0 0 0 0 0 9 23 34 Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENDER BY AGE
-----------------------------------------
MEN
--------
WOMEN
--------
18-29
--------
30-39
--------
40-49
--------
50-64
--------
65-74
--------
75+
--------
18-49
--------
50+
--------
65+
--------
MEN
18-49
--------
MEN
50+
--------
WOMEN
18-49
--------
WOMEN
50+
--------
Column n-Size 693 326 346 139 146 104 166 69 49 388 284 118 187 132 187 151 $0-$60K 10 11 9 16 8 7 7 6 21 11 9 12 13 8 8 10
$30,000 and under 3 3 3 5 3 4 1 3 8 4 2 5 4 2 3 2
$30,001 - $60,000 7 8 6 10 6 3 7 3 13 7 7 7 9 6 5 8
$60K-$90K 18 19 18 27 21 12 15 19 9 21 15 15 21 15 21 15 $60,001 - $90,000 18 19 18 27 21 12 15 19 9 21 15 15 21 15 21 15 $90K-$120K 22 22 23 16 24 19 27 27 21 20 26 24 19 28 23 24 $90,001 - $120,000 22 22 23 16 24 19 27 27 21 20 26 24 19 28 23 24 $120K-$150K 10 9 11 6 9 12 11 9 19 9 12 13 7 13 11 11
$120,001 - $150,000 10 9 11 6 9 12 11 9 19 9 12 13 7 13 11 11 $150K+ 22 27 20 15 25 37 24 19 7 25 20 14 30 23 22 18
$150,001 - $180,000 6 6 6 6 5 7 8 6 1 6 6 4 5 7 7 5
More than $180,000 17 21 13 10 21 30 16 13 6 19 14 10 25 15 15 12 REFUSED 17 12 19 20 12 12 16 20 23 15 18 21 10 14 15 22 Refused 17 12 19 20 12 12 16 20 23 15 18 21 10 14 15 22 1041 Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 305
Table 102: LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 306
Table 102: LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW
Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 307
Table 103: MODE OF INTERVIEW
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 308
Table 103: MODE OF INTERVIEW
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 309
Table 104: CONTACT METHOD
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 310
Table 104: CONTACT METHOD
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 311
Table 105: A/B SPLIT
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 312
Table 105: A/B SPLIT
Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 313
Table 106: DEMOGRAPHIC COMBINATIONS
Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 671 201 137 337 334 400 117 154 179 32 560 109 116 279 65 326 212 452 114 11 176 32 PARENTS 96 99 100 99 93 98 92 94 99 89 97 92 94 94 96 98 94 97 96 100 94 94 DADS 25 23 18 21 28 26 24 21 24 33 26 22 24 23 36 24 22 26 21 43 22 21 MOMS 27 18 26 21 33 25 31 28 27 20 27 28 31 31 24 24 32 24 36 26 33 24 MEN W/NO CHILDREN 22 29 27 28 15 25 17 17 22 24 21 23 18 16 24 26 18 23 15 0 16 27 WOMEN W/NO CHILDREN 23 29 28 29 17 22 18 29 25 11 24 19 21 24 13 24 22 23 23 31 23 22 EDUCATION BY GENDER 98 99 97 98 97 99 92 99 100 93 99 93 96 98 96 98 97 98 100 100 97 97 NON-COLLEGE MEN 23 27 29 28 18 24 20 23 25 36 23 20 24 23 20 24 23 23 20 24 21 34 NON-COLLEGE WOMEN 27 26 34 29 24 23 32 30 29 20 27 26 30 33 16 23 33 24 33 57 31 35 COLLEGE+ MEN 25 26 17 22 28 28 25 18 23 26 25 28 20 19 39 28 20 28 20 19 20 16 COLLEGE+ WOMEN 23 21 18 19 27 23 16 28 23 12 24 19 22 24 21 23 22 23 27 0 25 12 GENDER BY AGE 98 96 99 97 99 98 96 99 99 93 98 96 98 98 98 98 97 98 98 100 97 98 MEN 18-49 28 40 30 36 20 34 20 19 25 31 28 26 20 21 37 32 24 30 21 18 23 30 MEN 50+ 20 11 15 13 27 17 24 23 22 30 19 21 24 20 23 19 18 21 19 25 18 19 WOMEN 18-49 28 32 25 29 27 27 24 32 29 19 29 25 24 31 33 24 30 27 25 31 27 38 WOMEN 50+ 22 13 29 19 26 20 27 25 23 13 22 24 30 26 4 23 26 21 33 26 29 11 1050
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 314
Table 106: DEMOGRAPHIC COMBINATIONS
Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

A/B SPLIT
-------------------
VERY
SAT
--------
VERY
DSSAT
--------
TOTAL
SAT
--------
TOTAL
DSSAT
--------
YES
--------
NO
--------
VERY
SAT
--------
NT AT
ALL
--------
TOTAL
SAT
--------
TOTAL
NOT
--------
<11
YEARS
--------
11-20
YEARS
--------
21-30
YEARS
--------
31-40
YEARS
--------
41+
YEARS
--------
OWN
--------
RENT
--------
A
--------
B
--------
Column n-Size 671 151 19 541 84 206 431 94 11 165 41 210 171 138 81 71 468 157 334 337 PARENTS 96 100 93 97 90 94 98 95 86 95 89 98 97 96 93 93 97 96 95 97 DADS 25 29 38 25 29 26 25 21 28 24 32 26 25 25 23 23 30 14 26 24 MOMS 27 29 28 26 30 36 22 39 42 35 39 24 21 23 40 43 31 22 26 28 MEN W/NO CHILDREN 22 22 25 22 21 16 24 13 12 17 11 26 22 25 15 8 16 35 20 23 WOMEN W/NO CHILDREN 23 20 2 25 10 17 27 21 4 19 7 22 28 24 15 19 21 25 23 22 EDUCATION BY GENDER 98 100 100 99 95 97 98 98 91 97 97 98 100 99 100 87 97 99 97 98 NON-COLLEGE MEN 23 28 38 24 25 18 25 10 15 17 20 21 29 21 18 24 18 36 22 24 NON-COLLEGE WOMEN 27 27 19 27 20 27 27 36 23 27 28 24 32 19 26 40 28 25 27 26 COLLEGE+ MEN 25 23 32 25 29 26 25 26 25 26 27 31 21 29 24 11 28 16 27 24 COLLEGE+ WOMEN 23 22 11 24 20 27 21 26 28 28 22 23 18 30 32 12 23 22 22 24 GENDER BY AGE 98 99 100 98 99 97 98 97 90 98 95 97 98 99 97 99 98 97 98 98 MEN 18-49 28 28 32 28 29 19 32 18 20 21 11 43 28 26 14 1 22 42 28 28 MEN 50+ 20 22 38 20 25 23 17 17 14 21 32 8 21 24 27 34 24 10 20 20 WOMEN 18-49 28 28 6 29 19 31 27 31 42 32 26 36 30 34 13 6 24 37 28 28 WOMEN 50+ 22 21 23 21 26 24 22 31 13 23 26 11 18 15 43 59 28 8 23 22 Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

INTERVIEW
------------------------------
YES/
<19
@ HME
--------
YES/
NT @
HOME
--------
HAVE
CHLDN
--------
NO
CHLDN
--------
DADS
--------
MOMS
--------
MEN
W/NO
CHLDN
--------
WOMEN
W/NO
CHLDN
--------
WHITE
--------
LATNO
--------
CHNSE
--------
FLPNO
--------
INDN
--------
VTNMS
--------
TOTAL
ASIAN
--------
PPLE
OF CLR
--------
ENGLS
--------
SPNSH
--------
VTNM
/CHNS
--------
Column n-Size 671 185 162 347 298 167 181 145 153 95 90 97 83 89 97 387 544 633 17 21 PARENTS 96 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 96 97 93 97 98 97 97 96 100 100 DADS 25 49 47 48 0 100 0 0 0 22 23 23 17 36 26 26 25 25 29 25 MOMS 27 51 53 52 0 0 100 0 0 38 30 16 36 22 21 24 25 27 38 19 MEN W/NO CHILDREN 22 0 0 0 49 0 0 100 0 20 13 33 15 23 28 25 23 21 5 39 WOMEN W/NO CHILDREN 23 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 100 19 30 25 26 16 23 22 23 23 29 18 EDUCATION BY GENDER 98 100 96 98 99 99 97 99 99 99 99 99 100 100 100 98 99 98 100 94 NON-COLLEGE MEN 23 20 22 21 25 43 0 51 0 22 29 12 22 17 37 22 23 23 22 28 NON-COLLEGE WOMEN 27 23 33 28 26 0 54 0 51 43 49 8 33 11 23 18 24 26 61 8 COLLEGE+ MEN 25 29 25 27 23 56 0 48 0 19 7 45 14 44 17 31 26 25 12 30 COLLEGE+ WOMEN 23 28 16 22 25 0 43 0 48 14 14 33 31 27 23 28 25 23 6 29 GENDER BY AGE 98 98 99 99 97 98 99 98 97 99 100 97 100 99 97 98 98 98 100 92 MEN 18-49 28 34 9 22 36 46 0 74 0 14 23 32 21 47 34 33 31 28 32 31 MEN 50+ 20 14 37 25 11 52 0 24 0 26 14 25 15 14 20 19 18 20 2 26 WOMEN 18-49 28 42 7 26 31 0 49 0 61 17 40 20 46 28 24 28 30 27 64 18 WOMEN 50+ 22 8 46 26 19 0 50 0 36 41 23 21 19 9 19 18 19 23 3 16 1051
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 315
Table 106: DEMOGRAPHIC COMBINATIONS
Total
--------

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

CONTACT METHOD
------------------------------
HS OR
LESS
--------
SOME
COLL
--------
COLL
GRAD
--------
POST-
GRAD
--------
NON-
COLL
--------
COLL+
--------
NCOLL
MEN
--------
NCOLL
WOMEN
--------
COLL+
MEN
--------
COLL+
WOMEN
--------
$0-
$60K
--------
$60K-
$90K
--------
$90K-
$120K
--------
$120K-
$150K
--------
$150K+
--------
PHONE
--------
EMAIL
--------
POST
CARD
--------
Column n-Size 671 140 192 201 123 332 324 154 178 169 155 66 124 152 69 155 337 259 75 PARENTS 96 97 96 97 98 96 97 95 98 97 98 96 100 99 100 97 99 94 89 DADS 25 23 21 23 39 22 29 47 0 55 0 12 17 30 30 36 21 27 32 MOMS 27 22 34 24 24 29 24 0 54 0 50 17 25 23 41 32 21 35 27 MEN W/NO CHILDREN 22 25 21 23 19 22 21 48 0 41 0 38 32 17 14 19 28 13 20 WOMEN W/NO CHILDREN 23 27 20 27 17 23 23 0 43 0 47 29 26 30 16 11 29 19 10 EDUCATION BY GENDER 98 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 91 99 98 99 93 NON-COLLEGE MEN 23 49 44 0 0 46 0 100 0 0 0 39 31 26 25 9 28 21 9 NON-COLLEGE WOMEN 27 51 56 0 0 54 0 0 100 0 0 29 21 36 31 18 29 27 16 COLLEGE+ MEN 25 0 0 48 59 0 52 0 0 100 0 15 18 21 18 47 22 24 44 COLLEGE+ WOMEN 23 0 0 52 41 0 48 0 0 0 100 17 30 17 17 26 19 27 25 GENDER BY AGE 98 98 99 98 99 99 98 99 98 98 98 99 98 99 99 99 97 99 99 MEN 18-49 28 29 25 27 36 27 31 57 0 59 0 37 32 23 19 36 36 13 42 MEN 50+ 20 20 19 20 22 19 21 42 0 40 0 16 16 24 24 19 13 31 12 WOMEN 18-49 28 24 29 31 26 27 29 0 51 0 61 23 32 28 30 26 29 27 26 WOMEN 50+ 22 25 26 20 14 26 18 0 47 0 37 23 18 24 25 17 19 28 20 Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENDER BY AGE
-----------------------------------------
MEN
--------
WOMEN
--------
18-29
--------
30-39
--------
40-49
--------
50-64
--------
65-74
--------
75+
--------
18-49
--------
50+
--------
65+
--------
MEN
18-49
--------
MEN
50+
--------
WOMEN
18-49
--------
WOMEN
50+
--------
Column n-Size 671 326 345 134 137 103 165 69 49 375 283 117 187 132 187 151 PARENTS 96 96 97 98 99 96 95 96 89 98 94 93 99 92 97 96 DADS 25 51 0 5 25 35 31 33 28 21 31 31 41 66 0 0
MOMS 27 0 52 11 26 37 30 33 35 24 32 34 0 0 47 59
MEN W/NO CHILDREN 22 44 0 43 26 14 13 16 6 29 12 11 57 26 0 0 WOMEN W/NO CHILDREN 23 0 44 39 23 10 22 14 21 25 20 17 0 0 50 37 EDUCATION BY GENDER 98 99 96 98 100 100 99 96 86 99 96 92 100 99 99 94 NON-COLLEGE MEN 23 47 0 33 19 17 21 23 27 24 23 24 47 49 0 0 NON-COLLEGE WOMEN 27 0 52 27 21 25 29 32 31 24 30 32 0 0 48 56 COLLEGE+ MEN 25 52 0 16 31 35 25 27 13 26 24 22 53 51 0 0 COLLEGE+ WOMEN 23 0 45 23 29 24 24 14 15 25 20 14 0 0 51 38 GENDER BY AGE 98 98 98 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 MEN 18-49 28 58 0 48 50 52 0 0 0 50 0 0 100 0 0 0
MEN 50+ 20 40 0 0 0 0 47 50 40 0 47 46 0 100 0 0
WOMEN 18-49 28 0 54 52 50 48 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 100 0
WOMEN 50+ 22 0 44 0 0 0 53 50 60 0 53 54 0 0 0 100
1052
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 1 Table 1: Q15 MILPITAS CITY BUDGET FUNDING PRIORITY MEAN SCORE SUMMARY TABLE Total
-------
QA ON

CELL PHONE
------------------

CONTACT
------------------
Q9 POLICE SATISFACTION
----------------------------------------
YES
-------
NO
-------
PHONE
-------
ONLNE
-------
RIGHT
DIREC
-------
WRNG
TRACK
-------
DK/NA
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
MUCH
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
FAST
-------
TOO
SLOW
-------
ABT
RIGHT
/DK
-------
TOTAL
YES
-------
NO
-------
VERY
SAT
-------
VERY
DSSAT
-------
TOTAL
SAT
-------
TOTAL
DSSAT
-------
Column n-Size 693 204 142 346 346 409 125 159 183 36 573 117 119 283 68 341 222 464 119 12 184 33 PUBLIC SAFETY 22.46 20.37 18.80 19.73 25.19 20.78 29.46 21.30 20.28 26.24 21.70 26.40 28.02 23.81 23.67 21.10 23.46 21.99 26.95 23.41 24.58 16.47 NEIGHBORHOODS/HOUSING 17.23 19.04 16.93 18.18 16.27 17.65 15.99 17.10 18.48 18.13 17.27 16.97 16.83 17.46 17.89 16.90 18.10 16.82 16.76 22.29 17.78 19.74 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 16.60 16.58 20.80 18.31 14.90 17.23 14.46 16.68 17.67 13.28 17.16 13.87 13.91 14.70 16.98 18.10 15.02 17.40 14.56 16.14 14.32 19.36 ENVIRONMENT 15.03 14.57 15.35 14.89 15.17 14.92 14.03 16.09 14.85 14.24 14.95 15.44 13.79 15.47 15.70 14.53 15.18 14.94 14.54 20.55 14.40 19.03 CMMNTY WELLNESS/OPEN SPACE 14.65 13.57 15.03 14.17 15.14 14.42 13.75 15.96 13.73 16.05 14.56 15.05 14.48 14.96 12.37 14.85 15.55 14.24 14.84 7.12 16.57 11.52 TRANSPORTATION/TRANSIT 14.03 15.87 13.08 14.73 13.33 15.00 12.32 12.86 14.98 12.06 14.36 12.27 12.99 13.60 13.38 14.51 12.70 14.62 12.35 10.49 12.35 13.88 Total
--------
Q12 CITY SERVICE SATISFACTION
-----------------------------------------
Q16 CONTACT

A/B SPLIT
-------------------
VERY
SAT
--------
VERY
DSSAT
--------
TOTAL
SAT
--------
TOTAL
DSSAT
--------
YES
--------
NO
--------
VERY
SAT
--------
NT AT
ALL
--------
TOTAL
SAT
--------
TOTAL
NOT
--------
<11
YEARS
--------
11-20
YEARS
--------
21-30
YEARS
--------
31-40
YEARS
--------
41+
YEARS
--------
OWN
--------
RENT
--------
A
--------
B
--------
Column n-Size 693 157 26 554 92 223 436 95 18 174 49 218 174 143 84 73 481 160 346 347 PUBLIC SAFETY 22.46 21.77 31.13 21.53 27.72 25.72 20.87 24.29 29.63 24.10 31.47 19.66 21.96 22.76 23.95 29.68 22.91 20.61 22.06 22.86 NEIGHBORHOODS/HOUSING 17.23 18.35 14.77 17.79 15.05 17.18 17.11 17.43 13.95 17.49 16.10 18.54 16.78 16.49 17.85 15.09 16.30 20.19 18.33 16.12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 16.60 16.28 17.18 16.82 15.70 15.71 17.21 16.58 15.96 16.04 14.52 15.70 18.30 17.58 14.68 15.64 16.63 16.21 16.57 16.64 ENVIRONMENT 15.03 15.07 15.23 15.04 15.17 15.75 14.63 15.98 18.39 15.82 15.51 16.51 14.29 14.33 15.21 13.58 15.17 14.84 15.53 14.53 CMMNTY WELLNESS/OPEN SPACE 14.65 13.27 11.30 14.53 13.61 13.04 15.41 13.92 10.94 13.87 10.08 14.81 14.50 13.69 14.87 16.18 15.19 13.39 14.26 15.04 TRANSPORTATION/TRANSIT 14.03 15.27 10.40 14.29 12.75 12.60 14.78 11.82 11.13 12.68 12.32 14.78 14.17 15.15 13.44 9.84 13.80 14.76 13.25 14.81 Total
--------
Q20 CHILDREN
-----------------------------------------

PARENTS
-----------------------------------------

QC RACE/ETHNICITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE OF

INTERVIEW
------------------------------
YES/
<19
@ HME
--------
YES/
NT @
HOME
--------
HAVE
CHLDN
--------
NO
CHLDN
--------
DADS
--------
MOMS
--------
MEN
W/NO
CHLDN
--------
WOMEN
W/NO
CHLDN
--------
WHITE
--------
LATNO
--------
CHNSE
--------
FLPNO
--------
INDN
--------
VTNMS
--------
TOTAL
ASIAN
--------
PPLE
OF CLR
--------
ENGLS
--------
SPNSH
--------
VTNM
/CHNS
--------
Column n-Size 693 188 164 352 307 167 181 145 153 97 90 97 83 91 97 388 550 655 17 21 PUBLIC SAFETY 22.46 22.84 25.09 23.89 20.44 23.76 23.77 19.45 20.88 27.31 19.98 22.97 20.03 21.15 19.84 21.27 21.06 22.53 19.53 22.60 NEIGHBORHOODS/HOUSING 17.23 16.24 16.21 16.23 18.21 16.09 16.50 18.70 17.52 15.66 18.45 16.08 19.38 16.01 18.06 17.10 17.80 17.17 16.10 20.05 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 16.60 15.93 16.79 16.33 17.17 15.59 16.71 18.33 16.30 14.49 16.90 16.50 15.27 17.87 17.17 16.98 17.05 16.71 15.53 14.23 ENVIRONMENT 15.03 15.83 14.66 15.29 14.63 15.56 15.19 13.56 15.52 15.67 14.82 15.40 16.15 15.07 14.45 14.91 14.75 15.16 13.79 11.88 CMMNTY WELLNESS/OPEN SPACE 14.65 14.08 14.85 14.43 15.02 15.07 13.91 14.50 15.94 13.72 15.27 15.79 14.37 14.06 14.11 15.03 14.98 14.64 16.39 13.61 TRANSPORTATION/TRANSIT 14.03 15.08 12.41 13.83 14.53 13.94 13.93 15.47 13.83 13.15 14.59 13.25 14.79 15.83 16.37 14.71 14.37 13.79 18.66 17.63 1053
Item # 21.

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF MILPITAS 2022 COMMUNITY SURVEY - 320-991 (JANUARY 3-17, 2022) 2 Table 1: Q15 MILPITAS CITY BUDGET FUNDING PRIORITY MEAN SCORE SUMMARY TABLE Total
--------

QE EDUCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------

EDUCATION BY GENDER
-----------------------------------------
Q22 INCOME
----------------------------------------------------

CONTACT METHOD
------------------------------
HS OR
LESS
--------
SOME
COLL
--------
COLL
GRAD
--------
POST-
GRAD
--------
NON-
COLL
--------
COLL+
--------
NCOLL
MEN
--------
NCOLL
WOMEN
--------
COLL+
MEN
--------
COLL+
WOMEN
--------
$0-
$60K
--------
$60K-
$90K
--------
$90K-
$120K
--------
$120K-
$150K
--------
$150K+
--------
PHONE
--------
EMAIL
--------
POST
CARD
--------
Column n-Size 693 147 194 201 125 341 326 154 178 169 155 70 125 153 70 155 346 266 81 PUBLIC SAFETY 22.46 21.45 22.02 21.11 25.00 21.77 22.60 21.21 21.75 22.85 22.41 22.28 17.98 20.88 21.13 25.83 19.73 25.09 25.52 NEIGHBORHOODS/HOUSING 17.23 18.62 17.71 17.24 15.04 18.10 16.40 18.90 17.22 15.66 17.18 17.65 17.65 18.48 16.95 15.54 18.18 16.54 15.41 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 16.60 16.29 15.58 17.36 17.26 15.88 17.32 15.77 16.17 17.99 16.58 18.96 18.14 16.96 16.89 15.09 18.31 14.61 15.85 ENVIRONMENT 15.03 15.99 15.35 15.11 13.86 15.63 14.63 15.11 15.96 14.03 15.27 14.81 15.23 15.16 16.69 14.35 14.89 15.07 15.49 CMMNTY WELLNESS/OPEN SPACE 14.65 13.61 14.76 15.43 14.17 14.27 14.95 15.13 13.91 14.33 15.62 13.41 15.80 13.66 16.04 14.55 14.17 15.30 14.61 TRANSPORTATION/TRANSIT 14.03 14.03 14.59 13.75 14.66 14.35 14.10 13.87 14.99 15.14 12.94 12.89 15.19 14.86 12.30 14.63 14.73 13.39 13.12 Total
--------

QD GENDER
-------------------
QB AGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENDER BY AGE
-----------------------------------------
MEN
--------
WOMEN
--------
18-29
--------
30-39
--------
40-49
--------
50-64
--------
65-74
--------
75+
--------
18-49
--------
50+
--------
65+
--------
MEN
18-49
--------
MEN
50+
--------
WOMEN
18-49
--------
WOMEN
50+
--------
Column n-Size 693 326 346 139 146 104 166 69 49 388 284 118 187 132 187 151 PUBLIC SAFETY 22.46 21.98 22.48 19.71 19.49 22.91 24.91 25.95 25.79 20.49 25.31 25.88 19.72 25.37 20.49 25.14 NEIGHBORHOODS/HOUSING 17.23 17.45 17.05 19.18 16.93 16.11 16.57 17.10 15.10 17.51 16.45 16.28 17.29 17.02 17.82 15.95 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 16.60 16.88 16.37 16.97 17.31 15.82 16.98 15.37 16.00 16.79 16.42 15.63 18.16 15.06 15.36 17.65 ENVIRONMENT 15.03 14.49 15.39 15.04 16.25 14.50 15.06 14.77 14.01 15.35 14.81 14.46 13.84 15.61 16.63 14.09 CMMNTY WELLNESS/OPEN SPACE 14.65 14.70 14.88 13.67 14.92 16.13 13.86 13.54 16.47 14.80 14.22 14.74 15.18 14.03 14.93 14.47 TRANSPORTATION/TRANSIT 14.03 14.49 13.83 15.43 15.10 14.52 12.62 13.27 12.63 15.06 12.78 13.01 15.81 12.91 14.77 12.69 1054
Item # 21.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)

Item Title: Provide Direction on American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funding for Council Priority Items and Modifications to the ARPA Investment Plan and Provide Input on Proposed Process for Future Changes to the ARPA Investment Plan (Staff Contact: Ashwini Kantak, Assistant City Manager, 408-586-3053 and Lauren Lai, Director of Finance, 408-586-3111)
Category: Leadership and Support Services

Meeting Date: 3/15/2022
Recommendations: (1) Consider Council priority items for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding and provide direction to staff on any required modifications to the ARPA Investment Plan to allow for the additional allocation; and (2) Review and provide input to staff on proposed process for future changes to the ARPA Investment Plan

Background:

In March 2020, due to the rampant spread of the Coronavirus (Pandemic), a state of emergency was declared at the local, state, and federal levels and stay-at-home orders issued, which had an enormous impact on the local, state and national economy as well as the City’s finances.

On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), a $1.9 trillion stimulus package, to counteract the economic impacts of the pandemic. The City’s ARPA allocation of $16,736,815 is available in two tranches; the first half was received in June 2021, and the second half will be provided in June 2022. Funds need to be either expended or encumbered by December 31, 2024, with all funds to be expended by December 31, 2026.

On May 11 (link to staff report), staff presented preliminary information on ARPA’s Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funding. Staff also provided information on other funding through ARPA that could benefit the Milpitas community since the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Funding (CLFRF) is only a portion of the total ARPA funding. Staff received Council input on ARPA Plan spending priorities in May and June (June 8 Council Meeting agenda report). A majority of the spending priorities were related to financial assistance and social services to those impacted by the pandemic, economic vitality, infrastructure, public safety, and technology.

On June 21 (link to the agenda report), Council approved the ARPA Investment Framework including the Fiscal Guidelines and Five Investment Areas. Fiscal Guidelines include the following:

1. Identify and promote other ARPA or State funding sources to the extent possible before dedicating local ARPA funds.

2. Use one-time ARPA funds for one-time expenditures such as investment in infrastructure or technology with minimum ongoing operating costs.

3. Avoid ongoing General Fund commitments with additional programs and positions.

4. Avoid creating a structural budget deficit if restoring any reduced services.

5. Leverage regional agencies, non-profit partners, and existing programs to maximize efficiency in delivering programs and services.

On August 9 (link to the agenda report), Council approved funding for 25 programs in the ARPA Investment Plan and delegated authority to the City Manager to proceed with appropriation actions and contract approvals, up to the approved amount for each program approved by Council, once compliance with ARPA procurement, 1055
Item # 22.

contracting, and reporting requirements are confirmed. This will allow the funding to go to residents and businesses significantly impacted by the pandemic, in an efficient and expeditious manner.

Funding for the Five Investment areas of Community Services, Economic Vitality, Infrastructure, Public Safety, and Technology is as follows:

On January 11, 2022 (link to the agenda report), Council approved program funding re-allocations to enhance service delivery and/or streamline implementation, especially procurement.

Based on Council feedback at the January 25, 2022, Budget Study Session and as a part of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget development, Staff is requesting the Council consideration of priority items for potential ARPA funding and direction to staff on any required modifications to the ARPA Investment Plan to allow for the additional allocation.

Analysis:

As part of the budget development process, Staff strategically evaluates priorities and funding options. In this process, Staff is exploring the option of ARPA funding for various City services that may align with the Council’s Five ARPA Investment Areas. Council may want to consider these priority items for ARPA funding and provide direction to staff on modifications, if any, to the ARPA Investment Plan. Since there may not be sufficient funding to re-allocate from other ARPA programs, staff is also seeking Council input on whether other funding sources should be evaluated for funding the items discussed below. If Council determines these to be priorities that need to be incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budget development, then Staff will receive that information accordingly.

1056
Item # 22.

Potential ARPA Programs for Council Consideration

Business Improvement District ($75,000)

ARPA funding could be used for the business improvement district (BID) feasibility analysis and technical support for property owners and business owners on Main Street to assist with the formation of a BID and an engineer's report. A feasibility and analysis study will cost approximately $75,000 in one-time funding.

A business improvement district (BID) is a geographic area in which businesses opt to pay a self-assessed levy to fund projects and services within the district's boundaries. The services provided by BIDs are supplemental to those already provided by the City of Milpitas. In alignment with Strategy 31 of the Economic Development Strategy (EDS) to position Main Street (Midtown) as a community destination for local, independent retail and restaurants, the Office of Economic Development is proposing that a consultant conduct a feasibility analysis for the creation of either a property-based BID or a business-based BID for a portion of downtown on North and South Main Street.

Specifically, the BID is aligned with EDS Implementation Actions 31.3: Provide technical support for property/business owners on Main Street to explore forming a BID; funding services for BID formation consultant, and Action 31.6: Work with businesses to explore/implement rebranding of Main Street; possible funding from a new area BID. In addition, the formation of a BID would support the vision of Main Street as will be articulated in the ongoing Milpitas Gateway - Main Street Specific Plan update, for which its purpose is described in the General Plan 2040 as "to create an economically-viable main street type development that serves as a cultural hub of the city." Furthermore, the section Fiscal Sustainability under the Economic Development Element of the General Plan specifies Action ED-2c to "evaluate the feasibility of creating business improvement districts...to fund improvements and maintenance that support economic development."

As part of COVID-19 economic recovery, the City Council has been particularly focused on Main Street Revitalization efforts including the Pilot Storefront Improvement Grant Program, for both of which a BID would serve as a positive catalyst. BIDs are employed as an economic development tool to fund services such as cleaning streets, providing security, making capital improvements, construction of pedestrian and streetscape enhancements, various public infrastructure improvements, restoring and re-establishing historic districts, and marketing the area.

The formation of a BID is also aligned with Council Priority Area Economic Development and Job Growth (as listed in FY22 Adopted Budget and Financial Plan); and at the October 5, 2021, City Council meeting, Council recommended that the BID topic be sent to the Economic Development and Trade Commission. On February 14, 2022, the Economic Development and Trade Commission discussed establishing a BID. The response was favorable as it would complement Main Street Revitalization efforts through branding, the Specific Plan, and spur economic vitality by assisting the small business community. The Economic Development and Trade Commission supports the use of ARPA funding for a BID feasibility analysis consultant.

Staff is requesting Council consideration of a potential allocation of $75,000 of ARPA funding to the BID feasibility and analysis.

Unhoused Services ($100,000)

ARPA funding could be used to continue the current services with Santa Clara County Office of Supportive Housing and the County’s Homeless Engagement and Access Team (HEAT). Under the current $200,000 agreement with the County, the HEAT Team, via Abode Services, began providing homeless outreach, assessment, and street-based case management services in March 2021. The HEAT Team performs outreach throughout Milpitas to engage and provide resources to the City’s unhoused residents. The HEAT Team conducts assessments to enable more unhoused Milpitas residents to be enrolled into the County’s community queue, which provides housing referrals to County-funded housing programs for placement into housing.

From March 2021 through January 2022, the HEAT Team conducted assessments for 124 unhoused Milpitas residents. Since services began, the HEAT Team’s outreach and assessment of clients has increased the 1057
Item # 22.

number of Milpitas clients that have been assessed and that are in the community queue, leading to more Milpitas clients being housed or being in the process to be housed.

For instance, during the contract period, a total of 32 unhoused residents in Milpitas have been referred to a housing program thus far. While this is not a performance measure in the agreement with the County, it demonstrates the benefit of increasing the assessments. The following highlights the current status of the 32 unhoused individuals referred to a housing program.

 7 clients have been permanently housed.
 7 clients are in housing search looking for an apartment.  8 clients are working on apartment applications with the County’s Client Engagement Team for permanent housing.
 10 clients have been referred to housing but have not yet been located by outreach workers.

The funding for this initial year of services will be expended by the end of this fiscal yar. Given the major outreach and assessment effort completed in the first year of services, staff anticipates requiring reduced funding for ongoing services. Staff is requesting Council consideration of three potential options:

1. An allocation of $100,000 of ARPA funding to continue current services. This level will fund approximately one full-time outreach worker for Milpitas.

2. A potential allocation of $50,000 will fund approximately a 0.5 FTE. This will increase the response time for City referrals and decrease the City’s flexibility to make requests at any time.

3. If the City chooses not to contract with the County for enhanced outreach services, the County will continue to provide these services but Milpitas referrals will be considered as part of County wide referrals, without an expedited response time or any reporting. Instead of the City making Milpitas referrals directly to Abode Services through the streamlined process the City established last year, the City will need to send Milpitas referrals to the County.

The County has also indicated that they are not resourced to provide monthly reports but will instead provide quarterly reports, similar to what they do for other cities. This change in frequency of reporting is proposed regardless of whether these services are funded at $100,000 or $50,000.

Another type of service the County provides cities is intensive project-based case management for permanent supportive housing. When supportive housing units in upcoming projects become available for occupancy, this type of service may be explored at $13,500 per client per year. However, staff is not recommending this service currently as new supportive housing units are not available and the level of funding required is also not sustainable.

In response to a request at the February 15 Council meeting, included below is information about other cities in Santa Clara County that have contracted with the County for outreach and/or case management.

City Contract
Amount Services
Morgan Hill $50,000 Outreach (in FY 23 this funding will be shifting to homelessness prevention) Mountain
View $585,000
Intensive Case Management for Permanent Supportive Housing ($125,000) Outreach ($60,000)
Safe Parking ($400,000)
Santa Clara $125,000 Intensive Case Management for Permanent Supportive Housing San Jose $1,000,000 Intensive Case Management for Permanent Supportive Housing

1058
Item # 22.

Milpitas Sustainable Neighbor Education Program ($60,000) Per Councilmember Chua’s request at the January 11 Council meeting, $60,000 of ARPA funding could be allocated to fund a Sustainable Neighbor Education Program. The purpose of this program is to support Milpitas in achieving its CAP (Climate Action Plan) goals by demonstrating how the community can utilize the many city-promoted and city-supported sustainability and resiliency programs to reduce GHG emissions; developing and instilling long term skills and behaviors that can be shared with neighbors, family, friends and future generations to continue a low environmental impact community; promoting “how-to” steps that work; and proving Milpitas' resilience to global trends, like climate change and pandemics.

The funding would be used to recruit up to 8 - 10 Milpitas volunteers (from different housing types) that will receive specific training and technical assistance to identify and implement a sustainability plan that can serve as a road map for various home improvements and behavioral changes that will reduce GHG emissions and resource impact. The program will provide training and support (coaching, technical assistance, and connecting to financial incentives such as rebates from SVCE or Energy Upgrade California program) over the course of participation; develop documentation (written, audio and video) of the challenges faced by each participant, coaching provided, attempts made, and failures and successes encountered. The program will highlight learnings; publish and highlight key changes that contribute to significantly lowering a resident’s GHG emissions and environmental impact through home electrification (building, appliances, products, services and behavior) and other indoor and outdoor water efficiency retrofits and encourage other Milpitas residents to learn from their neighbors and implement their own actions at home. City will also seek funding from Silicon Valley Clean Energy to augment/enhance this budget.

Estimated costs of the program:

Fellow or intern to develop and administer program $25,000 Grant/incentive for each volunteer participant of up to $2,000 each
$20,000
Outreach and education materials include video showcases that will serve as models to encourage other residents to make similar electrification/sustainability retrofits.
$15,000
Total $60,000

Parks ($350,000)
While the current ARPA Investment Plan allocates a signification amount of $4.4 million (or 26%) of the total $16.7 million Milpitas ARPA funding, there has been Council discussion about funding an additional $350,000 to complete short-time improvements for the remaining two parks that were determined to be in poor condition.

ARPA could be a funding source, albeit it may be difficult to re-allocate up to $350,000 from the existing Five Investment Areas.

Potential Re-allocation of Milpitas ARPA Programs

Since the City received its first tranche of ARPA funding in June 2021, more information, opportunities, and priorities present themselves which weren’t known when the 25 ARPA funded programs were authorized.

Accordingly, Council may want to consider re-allocation from and/or within some programs such as Main Street Revitalization, Chamber of Commerce, Accessory Dwelling Units Program, and Community Events.

Main St. Revitalization ($500,000) Since spring 2020, the Pilot Storefront Improvement Grant Program (See Attachment 1 for additional information) has been underway. This $50,000 program is funded by the Community Benefit Fund. The Pilot Program’s purpose is to improve the appearance of commercial storefronts to encourage economic vitality, enhance business marketability, increase property values, and attract residents, visitors, and new businesses to the enhanced business district. The Pilot Program is designed to benefit businesses located on Main Street and be a catalyst for future investment in the downtown and Main Street Revitalization. While there have been applicants and some interest in the Pilot Program, 1059
Item # 22.

based upon the information to date, it appears the current ARPA allocation of $400,000 to Main St.

Revitalization may not be expediently deployed as intended.

Council approved $500,000 in the ARPA Investment Plan with $400,000 for Storefront Improvement Program and $100,000 for other items related to Main Street Revitalization. Based on preliminary issues identified, potential interest from businesses, Staff capacity, and ARPA deadline, Staff is recommending $300,000 for Storefront Improvement Program and $65,000, instead of $100,000, for other items related to revitalization.

That provides $135,000 for other consideration. Council may want to consider e-allocating $75,000 to the BID study and $60,000 to the Milpitas Sustainable Program. This will allow for longer term enhancements and services on Main Street, contingent on the businesses agreeing to form a BID, and will play an important role in the revitalization of Main Street through infrastructure improvements, landscaping, branding and economic vitality elements. Also, this will support the City’s efforts in achieving its CAP (Climate Action Plan) goals through City-supported sustainability and resiliency programs to reduce GHG emissions

Chamber of Commerce ($200,000) – In 2021 and early 2022, the City Council met multiple times to consider ARPA funding to assist the Milpitas business community through its Economic Vitality Investment Framework.

The approved ARPA Investment Plan included $200,000 of ARPA funding for the Milpitas Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) to support local businesses through the following events and business assistance activities: Crab Feed, Art and Wine Festival, Business Workshops, and Job Fair(s).

ARPA is governed by federal rules and has rigorous reporting and compliance requirements. The ARPA Investment Plan envisioned the Chamber as a beneficiary. Unlike sub-recipients, beneficiaries do not require a competitive procurement process and the reporting requirements are less rigorous. As stated above, the Council was interested in having the Chamber use the money towards specific events and activities. Given the funding amount of $200,000 and the potential appearance of the Chamber delivering services on behalf of the City, the Chamber could be classified as a sub-recipient. This would require a competitive solicitation (with no guarantee of the Chamber receiving the funding), specific commitments on deliverables and rigorous reporting requirements. Even if the Chamber is the successful sub-recipient through a competitive procurement process, it could result in challenges around reporting given the uncertainty around the specific programs and events as described below.

Due to the pandemic’s public health and safety concerns, availability of financial and human resources, and interest by the business community, the Chamber is experiencing challenges in scheduling and implementation of previously proposed events and programs. Therefore, staff recommends the following ARPA funding modifications based on conversations with Chamber representatives:
 Chamber ARPA funding will consists of 2 tranches of $100,000 each, with flexibility for staffing resources.
 The first tranche (Year 1) will be disbursed upon execution of a grant agreement by and between the City of Milpitas and the Chamber. The second tranche (Year 2) will be contingent upon a successful first year of ARPA funding for Chamber staffing resources and be considered as part of the overall City Council ARPA funding priorities.
 ARPA funding flexibility for staffing resources will be additive and an enhancement to the current Chamber staffing.
 The additional staffing will allow the Chamber to assist local businesses that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic through various programs, initiatives and events for business resiliency and recovery.
 The Chamber will fundraise to ensure that additional staffing services levels continue after receiving the one-time ARPA funding from the City.

Since the grant award will exceed $50,000, the Chamber will be required to provide information regarding proposed objectives, outcomes, number of people served, etc. which will be outlined in the grant agreement. 1060
Item # 22.

Rental and mortgage assistance to low and moderate income residents ($1,200,000) The Council approved the Milpitas rental and mortgage assistance program to assist those impacted financially by COVID. Also, Council previously expressed the policy of leveraging other governmental resources with Milpitas ARPA funding. In the area of rental and mortgage assistance, various State and Federal funding sources exist. For this reason, Council may want to consider reducing this amount by up to $100,000 and reallocating up to $100,000 to continue the unhoused services with the County. This would enable the City to continue assisting the unhoused who may also have been negatively impacted by the pandemic.

Community Events – Council approved $200,000 in ARPA funding for Community Events to support business revitalization. Funding would provide enhancements to the July 4th 2022 celebrations with the addition of a Ferris Wheel and a parade, four pop-up events related to agriculture, art walks, and camping in the park, cultural events reflective of our community such as Holi, Hoi An (Vietnamese Lantern Festival), and Día de los Muertos (Day of the Dead). For the first year, $71,500 of funding is committed and $60,500 is uncommitted.

For all three program years, there is a total of $128,5300 of uncommitted funds spread over three years (see table below).

Consistent with federal procurement guidelines, staff conducted the required RFP for the Ferris Wheel rental with responses due by March 3. No proposals were received. Federal procurements require that if no responses are received, the solicitation needs to be reissued. Further, the County of Santa Clara informed cities that the County will not provide funding for annual fireworks grants. With the first 4th of July celebration after two years of cancelling the event and potentially fewer fireworks in the valley, staff is planning for a higher attendance than the previous years’ average of 11,000 attendees. Therefore, given current staffing levels, there are insufficient resources in the Police, Public Works, and Recreation and Community Services departments to plan and stage the 4th of July event and a parade.

Staff considered several options to utilize the allocated funds in the amount of $75,000 holding a parade in fall, contract for a ferris wheel for the 2023 4th of July event, or dedicating the funds in the amount of $75,000 to another community event such as the 3-Day Roller Skating Summer Event, estimated at $105,000 and recently approved by Council as a priority item, or a 2022 Holiday Magic Event. Given the Council referral for a 3-Day Roller Skating event approved as part of the January 11, 2022 Council Prioritization session, staff recommends allocating the funding to this event. If this recommendation is approved, in order to avoid the arduous federal procurement process, staff may have to return to Council for a net reallocation of funds between ARPA funds and the General Fund.

Event Description
Uncommitted
Estimated Cost
4th of July Enhancements Ferris Wheel (3-year funding), Parade (1-year funding) $75,000 Earth Day/Agriculture (3-year funding) $6,000
Art Walk/Project Event (2-year funding) $5,000
Camping in the Park (3-year funding) $10,500
Holi Event (2-year funding) $6,000
Lantern Festival (2-year funding) $8,000
Day of the Dead (2-year funding) $6,000
Marketing & Outreach (3-year funding) $12,000
Total $128,500

1061
Item # 22.

Update on the Small Business Assistance Grant Program
On March 1, 2022, the 30-day Small Assistance Grant Program application period closed with 350 applications received by fiscal agent, Live Stories. The top business application categories are Restaurants and Food/Beverage at 21.5%, Miscellaneous at 13% (includes glass and glazing contractors, automotive uses, pet care, lighting manufacturing, unclassified, etc.), Barber Shops and Nail Salons at 10.5%, Health Practitioners (Dentists, Chiropractors, Optometrists, etc.) at 8%, Child Care Services at 6%, and Retail Stores at 5.7%.

Near the end of the application period, staff learned about SB 234 (2019), which prohibits local jurisdictions from imposing a business license, fee, or tax for the privilege of operating a family daycare home. In addition, home-based daycare centers are considered residential uses of property for purposes of local ordinances. A City Council Information Memorandum was issued on March 10, 2022, communicating that Milpitas home- based daycare businesses will be exempt from the business license eligibility requirement for the grant program. The Information Memorandum also stated that staff will conduct further outreach to home-based daycare businesses and accept additional applications in this category through March 24, 2022.

Currently, staff from various departments are reviewing the 350 grant applications for business license compliance and to ensure that there are no code enforcement issues. There is a possibility that after staff’s compliance review of the grant applications, there may be sufficient applications to proceed with grant award disbursement under one tranche. Staff will be implementing the critical grant fund distribution phase and will proceed with flexibility through either one tranche or two tranches depending on the outcome of the application compliance review and the potential for more home-based daycare centers submitting applications. Therefore, proceeding with one tranche or two tranches is subject to change.

Staff conducted marketing and outreach through the Bay Area News Group including Mercury News and Milpitas Post, digital billboard displays, Connected and Milpitas Matters articles, Constant Contact business emails, banner ad on City Website, two City press releases, canvassing various business areas, presentations to the Economic Development & Trade Commission and Milpitas Rotary Club, and the Milpitas Chamber and Silicon Valley Central Chamber of Commerce assisted with grant program advertising. On March 1, 2022, the Office of Economic Development and the Silicon Valley Central Chamber of Commerce hosted a Technical Assistance Workshop at City Hall to assist business representatives with applying for grants in-person.

Administrative Processing for Milpitas ARPA Programs
Each Milpitas ARPA program involves extensive administrative processing, especially due to the ARPA Federal funding source. The listing below summarizes the spectrum of administrative tasks required for each Milpitas ARPA program:
 Evaluate and verify eligible use of funds per Treasury Final Rules  Evaluate beneficiary versus sub-recipient award and requirements thereof  Develop program resources (i.e. staffing, services, supplies)  Evaluate one-time versus on-going program and budget implications  Develop program eligibility requirements, evaluation, selection and award  Development program plan and implementation
 Develop public outreach and program promotion campaign  Evaluate and comply with Federal Procurement requirements  Monitor grant recipients
 Obtain, retain and summarize grant documentation
 Develop and execute contracts (i.e. grant award agreements)  Submit mandatory reports to U.S. Treasury
 Develop policies, procedures and risk management monitoring controls  Comply with tax requirements and reporting (receiving W9, issuing 1099, evaluating who is issued these reportable grants) and develop new administrative methodology  Develop accounting and disbursement methodology (i.e. fee subsidies, vendor disbursements, payroll project cost accounting, etc.)
 Develop and update Milpitas ARPA website portal
 Report to City Council on a periodic basis
1062
Item # 22.

Proposed process for future changes to the ARPA Investment Plan On August 9, Council approved funding for 25 programs in the ARPA Investment Plan (Table 1) and delegated authority to the City Manager to proceed with appropriation actions and contract approvals, up to the approved amount for each program approved by Council. As noted above, every additional program requires a significant work effort and resources. Thus, staff recommends an annual review of the ARPA funding allocation as a part of the annual budget development. This proposed process for ARPA funding would align with the citywide budget development and also maximize efficacy of budget management and service delivery. Since the fiscal year 2022-23 budget development is currently underway, staff is requesting Council consideration of potential priorities which may warrant ARPA funding re-allocation.

1063
Item # 22.

TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF ARPA INVESTMENT PLAN – as of January 11, 2022 (For Reference)

No. Program/Activity Proposed
Funding
FY 21-22
Funding
Estimated
Time
Community Services

1. Rent relief and mortgage assistance to low and
moderate income residents – related to pandemic
$1,200,000 $600,000 2 years

2. Social services – mental health services, services for domestic violence and abuse victims and LGBTQ
plus community, senior nutrition program
$500,000 $125,000 3 years

3. Financial assistance to low and moderate income
residents for utility payments and childcare costs
$400,000 $100,000 3 years
4a. Beautify Milpitas program $100,000 $25,000 4 years
4b. Weed Abatement $90,000 $90,000 1 year

5. Pilot curbside trash pickup program $85,000 $85,000 3 months Subtotal $2,375,000 $1,025,000

Economic Vitality

6. Small business assistance – related to pandemic $1,500,000 $1,500,000 1 year

7. Assistance to hotels $200,000 $200,000 1 year

8. Accessory Dwelling Unit program $1,290,000 $500,000 3 years

9. Main Street Revitalization $500,000 $250,000 2 years

10. Community events $200,000 $100,000 2 years

11. Financial assistance to the Chamber of Commerce $200,000 $100,000 2 years

12. Workforce development $300,000 $150,000 2 years

13. Limited term Economic Development Specialist
position
$330,000 $165,000 2 years
Subtotal $4,520,000 $2,965,000

Infrastructure

14. Parks Rehabilitation $4,386,815 $2,000,000 4 years

15. Public Safety Facilities’ Rehabilitation $250,000 - 1 year (FY 22-23)

16. Mobile Emergency Operations Center (in lieu of
COVID Safe Facilities Improvements)
$375,000 $375,000 1 year
Subtotal $5,011,815 $2,375,000

Public Safety

17. Public Safety staffing (funding for 2 Police and 4 Fire positions for one year)
$1,200,000 $800,000 2 years

18. Fire Vehicles (fire pumper) $920,000 $920,000 1 year

19. Implementation of High Priority Emergency
Management Program Assessment Study
$200,000 $100,000 2 years

20. Virtual Reality Simulator Training Equipment $50,000 $50,000 1 year Subtotal $2,370,000 $1,870,000

Technology

21. Human Resources Information System $1,100,000 $100,000 TBD

22. Financial Management System $100,000 $100,000 1 year

23. Cybersecurity programs and training $300,000 $100,000 4 years

24. Technology infrastructure $610,000 $320,000 4 years Subtotal $2,110,000 $620,000
Recommendations for Unassigned Allocation

25. ARPA Funds Administration $350,000 $100,000 4 years Subtotal $350,000 $100,000

Grand Total $16,736,815 $8,955,000

1064
Item # 22.

Policy Alternative:

Alternative 1: Do not approved the proposed process for future changes to the ARPA Investment Plan.

Pros: Provides additional flexibility to change the ARPA Investment Plan.

Cons: As ARPA funds are expended for the various programs and projects, it will not be efficient or at times even feasible to continue to re-allocate funding.

Reason for not Recommending: Considering any re-allocation of ARPA funding through the budget process will allow Council to consider the funding in the context of all priorities. This process will also allow for more efficient use of staff time.

Fiscal Impact:

The ARPA allocation to the City is in the amount of $16,736,815. Re-allocation of funding does not impact the total ARPA revenue and/or appropriation. Leveraging ARPA funding for priorities that may otherwise have to be funded by the General Fund or other Funds could allow for other additional services and programs to be funded.

California Environmental Quality Act:

This item is not a Project under CEQA in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) as it can be seen with certainty that a general discussion of funding priorities by the City Council will not have a significant effect on the environment. Further, the item is also not a Project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(2) as an administrative activity which is defined in the CEQA Guidelines to include the purchase of supplies and personnel related actions. It is further exempt under CEQA Guideline 15378(b)(4) as it is a government fiscal activity that does not involve a commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Although the use of funding will be discussed for various potential projects, future environmental analysis will be conducted for the various potential projects prior to the City making any commitment or approval of any project, or it is covered by the CEQA Guideline 15061(b)(3) and/or 15378(b)(2).

Recommendations:

1. Consider Council priority items for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding and provide direction to staff on any required modifications to the ARPA Investment Plan to allow for the additional allocation

2. Review and provide input to staff on proposed process for future changes to the ARPA Investment Plan

Attachments

1. Storefront Grant Program
1065
Item # 22.

Attachment 1 - Storefront Improvement Grant Program
In Spring 2020, the Office of Economic Development launched the Pilot Storefront Improvement Grant Program with $50,000 from the Community Benefit Fund. The Pilot Program’s purpose is to improve the appearance of commercial storefronts to encourage economic vitality, enhance business marketability, increase property values, and attract residents, visitors, and new businesses to the enhanced business district. The Pilot Program is designed to benefit businesses located on Main Street and be a catalyst for future investment in the downtown and Main Street Revitalization. Eligible improvements include, but are not limited to paint, lighting, signage, awnings, windows, outdoor seating/dining, landscaping, benches, and historic architectural features.

Staff has entered into a contract with Architectural firm William Maston and Associates to assist applicants with design services. Staff has marketed one grant at $15,000 including design services, and a second grant at $20,000 grant, which does not include design services but instead allows the applicant to utilize $5,000 for an Architect of their choosing for the required permit and design plan set.

Due to the limited nature of the Pilot Program, staff targeted smaller buildings with one to three businesses located along Main Street. Outreach was conducted to businesses and property owners including Neeka Corporation, Tequila Shots, Red Chillies, The Best Sandwiches, and Reiki Energy Healing/Black Cat Comics.

The property owner of 167 and 187 South Main Street, where Red Chillies and The Best Sandwiches reside, submitted the Pilot Program’s first application in August 2021. There is a current proposal to design and build a shared outdoor dining area between the two restaurants to create a festive and safe destination to dine outdoors during the pandemic and beyond. The applicant will receive up to $15,000 in grant funding and design services from the Architect retained by the City and will be required to pay for up to 25% of the overall improvement costs.

The architectural team will provide design sketches, as-builts, and guide the applicant through the City’s permitting process. Staff has met several times with the business and property owners, Architect, and other City staff from Planning, Building Safety, and Fire Departments to analyze the site and work through any anticipated issues. Preliminary drawings have been prepared and staff is currently collaborating on solutions for meeting minimum parking and accessibility requirements.

While staff received one grant application in 2021, other property and business owners expressed interest in the Pilot Program, but shared concerns related to the pandemic, future tax increases due to improved properties, and inability to get property owners’ consent for improvements.

To start marketing the second Pilot Program grant project without design services, as well as garner interest in the future ARPA funded Storefront Improvement Grant Program, staff conducted in-person outreach to approximately a dozen property and business owners along Main Street on January 28, 2022. As a result of the recent outreach, staff has received interest 1066
Item # 22.
from five additional property and business owners to participate in the grant program. They include Seema Beauty Salon, Bombay Chaat House, Gurus of Dance, NPS Medical Clinic and Olinger’s Real Estate. Each interested party has received a flyer, Program Guidelines and Application. On February 8, 2022, staff received an application from Seema Beauty Salon, a property and business owner. On March 3, 2022, staff received the third application from Milan Indian Cuisine, who is also a property and business owner.

On March 10, 2022, staff met with property and business owners from Milan Indian Cuisine, Gurus of Dance, SG Inc. CPA, Maggie’s Beauty Max, New India Bazaar, Seema Beauty Salon, and Bombay Chaat House. These property and business owners are currently discussing their vision for storefront improvements. While staff has recently received two new applications from this neighborhood shopping center, based on the strong interest we anticipate receiving five more applications which may result in storefront improvements from 420-454 South Main Street.

To continue spurring Main Street revitalization through ARPA investment, staff recommends the following Storefront Improvement Grant Program structure:

Level 1 Grants: Up to $15,000 for the following improvements: paint, landscaping, and signage.

Level 2 Grants: Up to $25,000 for the following improvements: lighting, awnings, outdoor seating and dining, benches, windows, historic architectural features, and more. In addition to the grant amount, grantees will receive design services from an architectural firm obtained via a Request for Proposals (RFP) at a contract amount of not to exceed $75,000. The design services will consist of conceptual drawings and guiding applicants through the City's permitting process. Taking into consideration the number of potential applicants, staff capacity, and the ability to complete the projects within the deadlines required by ARPA, staff is recommending that the ARPA funded grant program could include five Level 1 Grants of up to $15,000 each, six Level 2 Grants of up to $25,000 each and design services for a total grant program amount of $300,000.

The completion of these projects will help create placemaking and the pedestrian-scale appeal that is desired along Main Street. Presently, staff continues to implement the Pilot Storefront Improvement Grant Program and will apply any lessons learned and necessary changes to the ARPA-funded Storefront Improvement Grant Program to best set up business and property owners for success.
1067
Item # 22.

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)

Item Title: Receive Report Regarding Mayoral/Council Term Limits and Provide Direction to Staff on Future Ballot Measures, If Any (Staff Contact: Christopher J. Diaz, City Attorney, 408-586-3040 and Ashwini Kantak, Assistant City Manager, 408-586-3053) Category: Leadership and Support Services
Meeting
Date:
3/15/2022
Recommendation: Receive report regarding Mayor/Council term limits and provide direction to staff on future ballot measures, if any.

BACKGROUND:

At the August 4, 2020, City Council meeting, the City Council voted 3-2 (Councilmembers Phan and Dominguez voted no) to discuss the possibility of the following: pursuing a change to the term limits applicable to the Mayor and/or the City Council. At the March 16, 2021 City Council meeting, the City Council voted 3-1-1 (Councilmember Dominguez abstained, and Councilmember Phan voted no) to agendize a discussion to change the term limits. At March 16, 2021, meeting, Mayor Tran also requested information related to potentially eliminating the position of the directly elected Mayor in favor of a rotational Mayor position amongst all councilmembers.

The position of the directly elected Mayor was established by the voters in the November 2, 1976 Election.

Term limits were also adopted by the voters in May 17, 1996, which added Milpitas Municipal Code section I- 400. The Municipal Code specifies that a person may serve a maximum of three consecutive elective terms as either a City Councilmember or as the Mayor. However, a person can extend out these terms if they are a Councilmember who is elected to Mayor or the Mayor who is elected to a City Council seat. Under this latter scenario, a person can serve a combined total of no more than four consecutive elected terms.

In order to change the position of directly elected Mayor or term limits, a future ballot measure would need to be proposed by the City Council and approved by voters.

ANALYSIS:

Directly Elected Mayor
The position of a directly elected Mayor and how to establish and terminate such a position is governed by California Government Code Section 34902(b) that specifies as follows:
(b) After an office of elective mayor has been established, the city council may subsequently submit to the electors the question of whether or not to eliminate the elective office of mayor, pursuant to the procedures enumerated in this article, and thereby reestablish the procedure of selection of the mayor by the city council. If a majority of the votes cast on the proposition are in favor of the elimination of the office of elective mayor, the office shall be eliminated on the expiration date of the incumbent’s term, and on the date the procedure of selection of the mayor by the city council shall be reestablished
Therefore, if the City Council wishes to eliminate the office of elective mayor, the question will need to be posed to the voters. It is recommended that the ballot measure for this question, if it is adopted, be effective in 2024 so that any individual elected to Mayor in 2022 can serve one full term. 1068
Item # 23.

Term Limits

California Government Code section 36502(b) authorizes a general law city, such as the City of Milpitas, to limit the number of terms an elected Mayor and/or City Councilmembers may serve. This State law outlines two principal rules:

 A local term limits measure must be “prospective”. It may only apply to new Mayoral/Council terms that were voted upon at the same election as the measure, or terms voted upon at a later election. For example, a term limits measure passed at the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election could apply to new terms elected at that same election and to those new terms elected in November 2024, 2026, etc. However, it could not apply to terms elected two years earlier at the November 3, 2020 General Municipal Election. That would make the measure impermissibly “retroactive” rather than “prospective”.

 A local term limits measure requires voter approval. It must be submitted to City of Milpitas voters at a “regularly scheduled election” and obtain majority voter approval. Under case law, a “regularly scheduled election” means (i) a statewide primary election, (ii) a statewide general election or (iii) a general municipal election. The next Statewide General Election will be held on November 8, 2022, which also coincides with the City’s next General Municipal Election. Staff notes that most cities schedule term limits measure elections to coincide with their Council elections. Because term limits measures require voter approval, the State Elections Code for local measures applies. Such a measure may be placed on the ballot by either a citizens’ initiative petition, signed by least 10% of the City’s registered voters, or by City Council majority action to call the measure for election. Once placed on the ballot, the City Attorney will prepare an impartial analysis of the measure and interested persons may submit written arguments for or against the measure, to be included in the voter information guide as provided by State Elections Code.

Beyond these two principal rules, how a term limits measure is ultimately written is left to local policy. There are a number of policy factors to consider:

Length of Term Limits?

California cities typically set either a two- or three-term limit. While one-term and four-term limits are legally permissible, they are rare in California. The current term limits in the City of Milpitas are effectively three consecutive terms with an option for a fourth term if the Mayor is voted into a Council seat, or a Councilmember is voted into the Mayor’s seat.

Lifetime or Consecutive Term Limits?

A lifetime term limit is precisely that. When the elected official reaches the applicable term limit, he or she may no longer serve in that elected office for the remainder of his or her life.

However, in the case of a consecutive term limit, when the elected official reaches the applicable term limit, he or she must step down from the office for a period of time. During this “cooling off” period, the person may not be elected or appointed to serve in that office. State law does not set a specific “cooling off” period. That said, this is typically set by local agencies at either two or four years. After the “cooling off” period expires, the person may again run for that elected office (or be appointed to such office) for additional consecutive terms as allowed under the term limits measure. In the case of the City of Milpitas, the cooling off period is the time period between general municipal elections which is 2 years.

Separate Term Limits for Mayor and Council or Combined Term Limits for Both Offices?

State law allows a term limits measure to set different limits for the elected Mayor and City Councilmembers. It also allows a single term limit to cover both Mayor and Councilmembers combined. The City of Milpitas currently has a single term limit that covers both the Mayor and Councilmembers. The City Council could 1069
Item # 23.

retain a single term limit for ease in administration or opt to create different limits for the elected Mayor and City Council, assuming the City retains an elected Mayor.

Based on the above, we will be inquiring with the City Council regarding the following:

 Does the City Council desire to eliminate the directly elected Mayor position? This would mean, if the measure passes, the directly elected Mayoral seat would be eliminated and all seats will be councilmember seats beginning in 2024.

 If not, then the City Council will need to consider whether it wants to provide any direction on the applicable term limits for the Mayor’s position or leave them as-is.  If so, then the City Council could consider options on term limits for all Council seats as further detailed below.

 Does the City Council want to modify the term limits applicable to City Councilmembers? If so, then:

 How many years should constitute a term? Current number of years that constitute a term is 4 years
 How many terms are allowed? Current number of limits allowed for each term is 3 at 4 years each for a total of 12 years.
 Are the term limits consecutive or lifetime? Current term limits are consecutive, not lifetime.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None at this time. However, if a term limits measure and/or a measure eliminating the directly elected Mayor position were placed on the ballot, there would be an estimated expense of $73,000 per ballot measure added to the cost for the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters to conduct the election.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The City Council’s action in receiving the report and providing direction is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is more akin to general organizational or administrative activities of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15378(b)(5).

RECOMMENDATION:

Receive report regarding Mayor/Council term limits and provide direction to staff on future ballot measures, if any.

Attachment(s):

None
1070
Item # 23.

March 15, 2022
City Council Meeting
Presentations

Item #C9: Approve the Pickleball Pilot Program at Gill Park

Item #18: 2022 Weed Abatement Public Hearing & Adopt a Resolution to Abate the Weeds

Item #21: 2022 Citywide Community Engagement Survey Results

Item #22: Receive Report on American Rescue Plan Act Investment Plan and Provide Direction
Milpitas City Council
Item #C9: Approve the Pickleball Pilot
Program at Gill Park
March 15, 2022
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
2 Pickleball Pilot Program Key Components
One-year Pilot Program
Pilot site work at Gill Park
• Extension of concrete play surfaces to accommodate two full pickleball courts;
• Resurface and restripe court for pickleball per USA Pickleball Association; • Installation of 4-foot-tall fencing and gates;
• Miscellaneous maintenance tasks (e.g., painting, signage, tree removal, irrigation repairs/replacements);
• Purchase of storage unit and portable nets which will be stored on site.

Staff led community outreach and court-use observation to establish pilot program hours
Bi-monthly assessment of utilization, demand, community feedback, decibel assessment
Six-month mid-program update
Existing Handball
Wall (to remain)
2’2’
Existing Handball
Court Surface (108’
by 45’)
(New) Court
extension (approx.
8’ by 45’)
(New) Court
extension (approx.
8’ by 45’)
(New) Pickleball
Court Lines (Typ.)
Not to scale – for illustration purposes
only
(New) 4-foot tall fencing around
perimeter
(New) Pickleball
Court Surface (Typ.)
Pickleball Court Schematic
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
Milpitas City Council
Item #18: 2022 WEED ABATEMENT PUBLIC

HEARING & ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO

ABATE THE WEEDS
March 15, 2022
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
2 Background
On February 15, 2022, the Milpitas City Council adopted Resolution No. 9118 declaring weeds growing upon certain described properties to be a public nuisance which must be abated and to set a public hearing for March 15, 2022.

A copy of the resolution was sent to the County of Santa Clara Consumer and Environmental Protection Agency – Weed
Abatement Program.

A notice for this public hearing was sent by the City Clerk’s Office to the local newspaper for publication, as well as mailed to the affected property owners by the Fire Marshal’s Office. 3 Background, Cont’d
The purpose of the public hearing is for the parcel owners who object to the removal of weeds to state their objections before the weeds are removed, and the costs made a lien upon their property.

The 2022 Weed Abatement List along with the associated
Resolution is included in the City Council’s agenda packet. 4 Jurisdictional Oversight
The City of Milpitas is the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) relative to the enforcement and abatement of overgrown
vegetation and weeds throughout the city limits, both public and private, except the following Agencies:
• California Department of Transportation – On / Off ramps, certain areas under joint contractual agreements between City of Milpitas Public Works Department and Cal-Trans, embankments, and right of ways along the 880 and 680 Freeway.
• Santa Clara Valley Water District – All creeks and associated tributary waterways.
• San Jose Roads and Airports – Medium strip along Montague Expressway after the Freeway 680 Overpass (east bound) to Dempsey Rd.

The County of Santa Clara Consumer and Environmental Protection Agency – Weed Abatement Program will begin their compliance inspection process pursuant to the listed parcels on April 1, 2022. 5 Recommendations
Open the Public Hearing for public comment and close the Public Hearing.

Adopt a resolution directing the County of Santa Clara
Consumer and Environmental Protection Agency - Weed
Abatement Program to abate the nuisance, keep an account of the cost, and embody such account in a report and assessment list to the City Council in accordance with the Milpitas Municipal Code.

City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
Milpitas City Council
Item #21: 2022 Citywide Community
Engagement Survey Results
March 15, 2022
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
The City has been conducting an
annual community survey to
understand community
perceptions, satisfaction levels and
priorities related to services and
Council Priority Areas.

Contracted with Fairbank, Maslin,
Mauling, Metz & Associates (FM3)
in January 2022.

The survey is just one of the many
tools being used to facilitate the
preparation of the Fiscal Year 2022
– 2023 annual city budget.

Council will be provided with a
collective representation of
information for consideration as
priorities and goals are identified,
and to effectively prepare the
budget for Council’s feedback over
the next several months.

Background

3 Survey Specifications
Dates January 3-17, 2022
Survey Type Dual-mode Resident Survey
Research Population Milpitas Residents Ages 18+
Total Interviews 693
Margin of Sampling Error ±4.0% at the 95% Confidence Level Contact Methods
Data Collection Modes
Language(s) English, Spanish, Vietnamese, Chinese
Postcard
Invitations
Telephone
Calls
Email
Invitations
Telephone
Interviews
Online
Interviews
(Note: Not All Results Will Sum to 100% Due to Rounding) 4 67%
Key Numbers
59%
83%
86%
Feel things in the city are headed in the right direction Approve of City government overall
Are satisfied with the overall quality of life in Milpitas Are “proud to live in Milpitas”
5 Regional Context
• Quality of life ratings are trending downward:

Hayward resident quality of life ratings are down 7
points from 2019 – from 75% “very or somewhat
satisfied” to 68%. Livermore resident quality of life
ratings are down 12 points from 2020 – from 48%
“excellent” to 36%. Pleasanton resident quality of
life ratings are down 15 points from 2017 – from
67% “excellent” to 52%. Just 13% rate quality of
life “excellent” in Oakland.
• And more residents feel things are headed in the
wrong direction: 64% of Oakland voters feel
things are headed on the wrong track – up 13
points from just one year ago. 41% of San Jose
voters feel things are headed in the right
direction, down 10 points from 2020. 55% of San
Francisco voters feel things are headed on the
wrong track as well.
320-944
6 The share of those in cities recently surveyed
who rate their city as an “excellent” or “good
place to live” has decreased.

City Previous survey Most recent survey Difference
Livermore 93% (2020) 86% (2021) -7%
Pleasanton 96% (2017) 94% (2021) -2%
Oakland 60% (2020) 47% (2021) -13%
In general, would you say that [city] is an excellent, good, fair, or poor place to live? (Excellent/Good)
7 Greater proportions of residents in major
cities say their city is headed off on the
wrong track.

City Description 2020 2021 Difference
Oakland
Right Direction 28% 19% -11%
Wrong Track 51% 64% +13%
San Jose
Right Direction 51% 41% -10%
Wrong Track 34% 41% +7%
Would you say that things in [city] are generally headed in the right direction, or do you feel that things are off on the wrong track?
8 9
Q2.

Please tell me how satisfied you are with the overall quality of life in Milpitas:
very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied.

Residents remain very broadly
satisfied with the local quality of life.
26%
24%
22%
56%
56%
58%
12%
16%
16%
5%2022
2021
2020
Very Sat. Smwt. Sat. Smwt. Dissat. Very Dissat. Don't Know Total Sat.

Total
Dissat.
83% 17%
79% 20%
80% 20%
10 Q1.
59%
50%
49%
57%
18%
29%
32%
26%
23%
22%
19%
17%
2022
2021
2020
2019
Right Direction Wrong Track Don't Know
Would you say that things in Milpitas are generally headed in the right direction, or do you feel that things are pretty seriously off on the wrong track? Counter to regional trends, more residents
believe Milpitas is headed in the right
direction than in the prior two years.
11 Inflation, housing costs, and homelessness
are top issues of concern for residents.

Q4. I'd like to read you some problems facing Milpitas that other people have mentioned. Please tell me whether you think it is an extremely serious problem, a very serious problem, somewhat serious problem, or a not too serious problem in Milpitas. 37%
40%
29%
20%
20%
18%
22%
18%
12%
10%
33%
29%
32%
29%
29%
28%
22%
18%
22%
18%
22%
22%
26%
32%
29%
32%
35%
28%
31%
28%
6%
7%
12%
18%
19%
19%
15%
31%
26%
33%
7%
5%
8%
11%
Inflation and rising costs
The cost of housing
Homelessness
Traffic congestion
Drought
Crime
Illegal dumping
Too much growth and development
Jobs and the economy
Blight and abandoned buildings
Ext. Ser. Prob. Very Ser. Prob. Smwt. Ser. Prob. Not Too Ser. Prob. Don't Know Ext./Very Ser. Prob.
70%
69%
60%
49%
49%
45%
44%
36%
34%
28%
12 More than four in five are proud to
live in Milpitas and feel different
cultures are celebrated in the City.

Q5. ^Not part of split sample
41%
45%
46%
39% 6%
10%
6%
^I am proud to live in Milpitas.

I feel different cultures are celebrated
in Milpitas.

Strng. Agr. Smwt. Agr. Don't Know Smwt. Disagr. Strng. Disagr.

Total
Agr.

Total
Disagr.
86% 12%
84% 9%
Please tell me if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with the statement.
13 Statement 2019 2020 2021 2022 Difference
2021-2022
^I am proud to live in Milpitas. 83% 81% 80% 86% +6%
I feel different cultures are celebrated in Milpitas. 85% 88% 83% 84% +1% (Total Agree)
These attitudes have held
relatively constant in recent years.

Q5. ^Not Part of Split Sample
Please tell me if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with the statement.
14 Q6. I am going to read you some words and phrases that might describe Milpitas. Please tell me whether you think each of the phrases below describes Milpitas very well, somewhat well, not too well, or not at all well. Split Sample 91%
88%
88%
87%
86%
82%
67%
45%
6%
10%
10%
12%
13%
14%
24%
51%
Accepting
Diverse
Great location
Good place to live, play, and work
Safe
Growing
Up and coming
Affordable
Total Well Total Not Well Difference
+85%
+78%
+78%
+75%
+73%
+68%
+43%
-6%
Overwhelming majorities describe Milpitas as
“accepting,” “diverse,” and in a “great location.”
15 More residents describe Milpitas as a “good
place to live, play, and work” than previously.

Q6. I am going to read you some words and phrases that might describe Milpitas. Please tell me whether you think each of the phrases below describes Milpitas very well, somewhat well, not too well, or not at all well. Split Sample Word/Phrase 2019 2020 2021 2022 Difference
2021-2022
Good place to live, play, and work 81% 78% 81% 87% +6%
Accepting 83% 85% 86% 91% +5%
Growing 83% 84% 77% 82% +5%
Affordable 38% 49% 42% 45% +3%
Great location 81% 88% 87% 88% +1%
Up and coming 69% 72% 66% 67% +1%
Diverse 82% 86% 89% 88% -1%
Safe 87% 85% 89% 86% -3%
(Total Well)
16 Perceptions of growth in Milpitas have
returned to their pre-pandemic levels.

Q7.

Do you think the rate of growth and development in general in Milpitas is (Half Sample: too fast, about right, or too slow)
(Half Sample: too slow, about right, or too fast)?
17%
21%
27%
35%
24%
13%
14%
15%
49%
53%
52%
41%
7%
8%
5%
7%
5%
2022
2021
2020
2019
Much Too Fast Somewhat Too Fast About Right/Don't Know Somewhat Too Slow Much Too Slow Total Too Fast
Total
Too Slow
41% 10%
35% 13%
41% 8%
51% 9%
17 18
Majorities report feeling safe
doing most activities in Milpitas.

Q11.

Can you tell me how safe you feel __________? Do you feel safe, unsafe, or neither safe nor unsafe? 44%
39%
31%
34%
32%
21%
41%
43%
48%
45%
45%
35%
8%
9%
9%
7%
10%
12% 17%
5%
5%
8%
11%
8%
10%
In your neighborhood
In the City park closest to your residence
Driving in Milpitas
Walking in Milpitas
Shopping in Milpitas
Bicycling in Milpitas
Very Safe Smwt. Safe Neither Safe/Unsafe Don't Know/No Opin. Smwt. Unsafe Very Unsafe Total Safe
Total
Unsafe
85% 6%
82% 7%
79% 10%
78% 12%
77% 11%
56% 14%
67% “safe” excluding those without opinions
19 Q11a-e.

Aspect of Life 2019 2020 2021 2022 Difference
2021-2022
Driving in Milpitas 79% 73% 82% 79% -3%
In the City park
closest to your residence 85% 79% 85% 82% -3%
In your neighborhood 88% 85% 89% 85% -4%
Walking in Milpitas 83% 78% 83% 78% -5%
Bicycling in Milpitas 57% 58% 65% 56% -9%
(Total Safe)
Many perceptions of safety appeared to have
peaked during the pandemic (early 2021).

Can you tell me how safe you feel __________? Do you feel safe, unsafe, or neither safe nor unsafe? 20 One in three have interacted with
a Milpitas police officer in the last year.

Q8.

Keeping in mind that this survey is completely confidential, I’d like to know more about your experiences with public safety in Milpitas. Have you personally interacted with a Milpitas police officer for any reason in the last year? 20%
5%
7%
67%
1%
Yes, self
Yes, household member
Yes, both
No, neither
Don't know
Total
Yes
32%
Those Most Likely to Say Yes:
• Have a household income under $60K
(50%)
• Have lived 41+ years in Milpitas (45%)
• White residents (44%)
• Renters (42%)
• Ages 30-39 (40%)
• Non-college educated women (39%)
21 Four in five with direct experience with
police are satisfied with their interaction.

Q9.

In general, how satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the professionalism of the Milpitas police officer?
(Asked of Those with Police Experience in Household, n=222) 54%
29%
10%
5%
2%
Very satisfied
Somewhat satisfied
Somewhat dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know
Total
Satisfied
83%
Total
Dissatisfied
15%
22 Residents gave a variety of reasons for
satisfaction with their police interaction.
21%
20%
20%
17%
13%
9%
3%
3%
20%
5%
9%
Helpful/informative/knowledgeable
Very professional/respectful
Friendly/calm/polite attitude
Considerate/caring (listened to me)
Very prompt/quick response
Open/approachable/accessible
Honest/fair
Satisfied with police interaction
Other
Don't know/Unsure
Refused
Q10a.

In a few words of your own, why were you SATISFIED with that interaction? (Open-Ended, Asked of Those Satisfied Only, n=184)
23 Those dissatisfied often cited
unprofessionalism and insensitivity.

Q10b.

In a few words of your own, why were you DISSATISFIED with that interaction? 37%
32%
14%
10%
20%
5%
7%
Unprofessional/disrespectful
Unconcerned/insensitive/
dismissive
Did not resolve the issue/
incompetent
Poor response time
Other
Don't know/Unsure
Refused
(Open-Ended, Asked of Those Dissatisfied Only, n=33)
24 25
54%
41%
14%
15%
12%
33%
39%
53%
39%
41%
11%
9%
13%
21%
27%
8%
13%
15%
15%
7%
10%
6%
The Milpitas Fire Department
The Milpitas Police Department
Milpitas City government overall
The Milpitas City Council
The City's budget management
Strng. Appr. Smwt. Appr. Don't Know Smwt. Disappr. Strng. Disappr.

Q3.

Would you say you generally approve or disapprove of the job that __________ is doing? Total
App.

Total
Disapp.
86% 2%
79% 12%
67% 20%
54% 25%
52% 21%
At least four in five approve of City police and
fire; majorities also approve of the City
overall.
26 Q3.

Job Approval 2019 2020 2021 2022 Difference
2021-2022
Milpitas City government overall 69% 67% 62% 67% +5%
The City's budget management 43% 54% 48% 52% +4%
The Milpitas City Council 57% 54% 54% 54% 0%
The Milpitas Police Department 85% 84% 81% 79% -2%
The Milpitas Fire Department 89% 86% 89% 86% -3%
(Total Approve)
Approval for the City overall and its budget
management has increased in the last year.

Would you say you generally approve or disapprove of the job that __________ is doing? 27 More than nine in ten agree that maintaining
public safety services and infrastructure
should be top priorities for the City.

Q5. Please tell me if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with the statement. 56%
57%
23%
17%
21%
38%
34%
45%
51%
41%
7%
11%
15%
18%
19% 7%
Maintaining public safety services in
Milpitas should be a top priority.

Maintaining public infrastructure in
Milpitas should be a top priority.

I trust the City to plan for
Milpitas' future.

I trust the City of Milpitas to properly
manage our tax dollars.

Milpitas City government operates
in a way that is open and accountable
to the public.

Strng. Agr. Smwt. Agr. Don't Know Smwt. Disagr. Strng. Disagr. Total Agr.

Total
Disagr.
94% 3%
91% 5%
68% 23%
67% 25%
62% 26%
28 Q5. Please tell me if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with the statement.

Statement 2019 2020 2021 2022 Difference
2021-2022
I trust the City of Milpitas to properly manage our
tax dollars.
61% 61% 59% 67% +8%
I trust the City to plan for
Milpitas' future.
63% 62% 65% 68% +3%
Maintaining public infrastructure in Milpitas
should be a top priority.
90% 93% 90% 91% +1%
Milpitas City government operates
in a way that is open and accountable
to the public.
61% 65% 61% 62% +1%
Maintaining public safety services in Milpitas
should be a top priority.
97% 96% 96% 94% -2%
(Total Agree)
The share of those who trust
the City to manage their tax dollars
has increased in the last year.
29 30
Four in five residents are
satisfied with City services overall.

Q12.

Please tell me how satisfied you are with the overall quality of City services:
very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied.

Total
Sat.

Total
Dissat.
80% 13%
75% 18%
79% 16%
Those most likely to be “very satisfied” were Filipino residents (32%), white residents (29%), and those who’ve lived in Milpitas for 21-30 years (28%). Those more likely to report dissatisfaction were post-graduate educated (19%) and Latino residents (19%). 23%
21%
15%
57%
54%
64%
7%
8%
10%
13%
12%
5%
2022
2021
2020
Very Sat. Smwt. Sat. Don't Know Smwt. Dissat. Very Dissat. 31 Next, let’s look at how
respondents viewed the
importance of each service …
32 51%
43%
47%
43%
37%
48%
40%
37%
35%
42%
36%
40%
45%
32%
40%
41%
8%
12%
13%
14%
15%
15%
16%
17%
5%Providing emergency 911 and
fire response
Paving and repairing streets and roads
Maintaining the sewer and
wastewater system
Maintaining public facilities and
infrastructure
Maintaining public parks in
good physical condition
Providing police services
Preparing for emergencies and
natural disasters
Enforcing traffic laws to protect the safety
of pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers
Ext. Impt. Very Impt. Smwt. Impt. Not Too Impt. No Opin./Don't Know Q13. Now let me ask you about some specific City services provided to Milpitas residents. Please tell me how important each service is to making Milpitas a good place to live: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample Residents most highly value emergency
response and repairing public infrastructure.

Ext./Very
Impt.
86%
85%
83%
83%
83%
80%
80%
78%
33 Q13. Now let me ask you about some specific City services provided to Milpitas residents. Please tell me how important each service is to making Milpitas a good place to live: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample Ext./Very
Impt.
78%
74%
73%
73%
71%
70%
35%
38%
37%
33%
33%
35%
39%
35%
36%
38%
37%
34%
17%
20%
21%
22%
18%
21%
5%
7%
7%
5%
Removing blight and illegal dumping
Providing programs to help seniors
Keeping the community informed
about important City programs
Providing afterschool programs for
young people
Developing policies to support
affordable housing
Ext. Impt. Very Impt. Smwt. Impt. Not Too Impt. No Opin./Don't Know Developing programs that promote
sustainable living, such as clean energy,
water conservation, and recycling
They also value, though less intensely, sustainability, community programs, and affordable housing….
34 30%
32%
35%
27%
28%
37%
35%
30%
37%
33%
27%
23%
21%
24%
30%
6%
9%
7%
5%
5%
8%
Providing recreation opportunities
and programs at City parks and
recreation centers
Attracting new employers and
jobs to the city
Providing services to people who
are homeless
Assisting new businesses in obtaining
required permits and licenses
Recruiting new businesses and
companies to the city
Ext. Impt. Very Impt. Smwt. Impt. Not Too Impt. No Opin./Don't Know Q13. Now let me ask you about some specific City services provided to Milpitas residents. Please tell me how important each service is to making Milpitas a good place to live: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample …as well as providing services to people who are
homeless and attracting jobs and business.

Ext./Very
Impt.
67%
66%
65%
64%
60%
35 27%
24%
23%
16%
21%
33%
36%
34%
39%
32%
23%
28%
25%
31%
32%
11%
6%
13%
6%
12%
6%
6%
5%
8%
Providing rent relief to prevent
residents from becoming homeless
Providing bicycle lanes and paths
Providing programs that celebrate
diversity and inclusion
of different cultures
Providing opportunities to be involved
in City government
Supporting a diverse range of arts
and cultural activities
Ext. Impt. Very Impt. Smwt. Impt. Not Too Impt. No Opin./Don't Know Q13. Now let me ask you about some specific City services provided to Milpitas residents. Please tell me how important each service is to making Milpitas a good place to live: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample In fact, more than half rate every
service “extremely or very important.”
Ext./Very
Impt.
60%
60%
57%
55%
53%
36 Q13. Now let me ask you about some specific City services provided to Milpitas residents. Please tell me how important each service is to making Milpitas a good place to live: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample City Service 2021 2022 Difference
2020-2021
Providing services to people who are homeless 58% 65% +7% Preparing for emergencies and natural disasters 86% 80% -6% Supporting a diverse range of arts and cultural activities 59% 53% -6% Keeping the community informed about important City
programs 77% 71% -6%
Providing emergency 911 and fire response 92% 86% -6%
Maintaining the sewer and wastewater system 91% 83% -8% (Changes in importance of at least 5%; Extremely/Very Important) Services for homeless people have
risen in importance since 2021.
37 Next, let’s look at how
satisfied respondents were
with each service …
38 Total
Sat.

Total
Dissat.
86% 10%
84% 3%
81% 11%
77% 12%
73% 15%
71% 15%
70% 14%
31%
40%
37%
25%
26%
26%
21%
55%
44%
44%
52%
48%
45%
49%
13%
8%
11%
12%
14%
16%
9%
7%
9%
11%
11%
11%
Maintaining public parks in good
physical condition
Providing emergency 911 and
fire response
Providing police services
Enforcing traffic laws to protect the
safety of pedestrians, cyclists,
and drivers
Maintaining public facilities and
infrastructure
Maintaining the sewer and
wastewater system
Providing recreation opportunities
and programs at City parks and
recreation centers
Very Sat. Smwt. Sat. No Opin./Don't Know Smwt. Dissat. Very Dissat.

Q14. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. Please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. Split Sample Four in five are satisfied with park maintenance,
911 response, and police services.
39 Total
Sat.

Total
Dissat.
69% 27%
66% 22%
65% 19%
64% 13%
62% 8%
61% 17%
60% 13%
24%
17%
21%
17%
20%
21%
21%
45%
50%
44%
47%
42%
40%
39%
12%
16%
23%
30%
22%
26%
16%
16%
14%
10%
5%
12%
10%
10%
5%
5%
5%
Paving and repairing streets and roads
Keeping the community informed
about important City programs
Providing bicycle lanes and paths
Providing programs that celebrate
diversity and inclusion of
different cultures
Providing programs to help seniors
Preparing for emergency and
natural disasters
Providing afterschool programs for
young people
Very Sat. Smwt. Sat. No Opin./Don't Know Smwt. Dissat. Very Dissat.

Q14. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. Please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. Split Sample Satisfaction is broad, though less intense, for
street repair, recreation, and disaster prep.
40 17%
21%
20%
14%
12%
42%
37%
37%
42%
43%
22%
19%
25%
18%
26%
14%
20%
14%
16%
16%
6%
10%
Recruiting new businesses and
companies to the city
Developing programs that promote
sustainable living, such as clean energy,
water conservation, and recycling
Supporting a diverse range of arts and
cultural activities
Removing blight and illegal dumping
Attracting new employers and
jobs to the city
Very Sat. Smwt. Sat. No Opin./Don't Know Smwt. Dissat. Very Dissat.

Total
Sat.

Total
Dissat.
58% 20%
57% 24%
57% 17%
56% 26%
55% 20%
41 14%
13%
12%
16%
15%
39%
40%
34%
29%
28%
38%
30%
23%
31%
26%
7%
12%
16%
15%
19%
5%
15%
8%
12%
Assisting new businesses in obtaining
required permits and licenses
Providing opportunities to be involved
in City government
Developing policies to support
affordable housing
Providing rent relief to prevent residents
from becoming homeless
Providing services to people
who are homeless
Very Sat. Smwt. Sat. No Opin./Don't Know Smwt. Dissat. Very Dissat.

Total
Sat.

Total
Dissat.
53% 9%
53% 17%
46% 30%
45% 23%
43% 31%
42 Q14. I am going to read you the same list of services provided to residents. Please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. Split Sample City Service 2021 2022 Difference
2020-2021
Maintaining public parks in good physical condition 78% 86% +8% Providing programs to help seniors 57% 62% +5%
Providing bicycle lanes and paths 70% 65% -5%
Developing programs that promote sustainable living, such as clean energy, water conservation, and recycling 64% 57% -7%
Supporting a diverse range of arts and cultural activities 69% 57% -12% (Changes in satisfaction of at least 5%; Total Satisfied) Satisfaction with park maintenance and
programs for seniors have increased.

This difference is largely driven by an increase
in “don’t know/no opinion” responses.
43 It can be informative for planning
and budgeting purposes to combine
the importance and satisfaction
ratings to see if there are any
relative mismatches between
importance and satisfaction.
44 Q13 & Q14.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total Satisfaction
Extremely/Very Important
Nearly all services are generally important,
but given unfamiliarity with many, some
satisfaction levels appear somewhat low.
45 Q13 & Q14 (Special Run).
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
“Informed” Total Satisfaction
Extremely/Very Important
Let’s zoom in to look at
this more closely…
Removing the “don’t knows” from the satisfaction
ratings to create “informed” satisfaction ratings
creates a cluster of services in the upper right…
46 Q13 & Q14 (Special Run).
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
“Informed” Total Satisfaction
Extremely/Very Important
Rough
trendline
discounting
the outliers
We’ve shifted the
axis’ scales…
…and now it is a bit easier to zoom
in and see if there are any outliers.
47 Q13 & Q14 (Special Run).
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
“Informed” Total Satisfaction
Extremely/Very Important
Providing recreation opportunities and
programs at City parks and recreation centers
Developing policies to
support affordable housing
Paving and
repairing streets
and roads
Recreation opportunities, affordable housing policies,
addressing blight, and street repairs are services where importance outpaces “informed” satisfaction levels.
48 Q15.

I am going to ask you to imagine you are in charge of Milpitas’ City budget. Every year, the City needs to prioritize funding various services. For this exercise, assume you have $100 to spend on 6 priority areas. Please tell me how many dollars out of 100 you would spend on each one, keeping in mind that the total must add up to $100. $22.46 $17.23 $16.60 $15.03 $14.65 $14.03
Public safety Neighborhoods
and housing
Economic
development
Environment Community
wellness and
open space
Transportation
and transit
Given a hypothetical $100 budget,
residents would prioritize public safety
with more than one-fifth of their funds.
49 $22.46
$24.70
$17.23
$17.50
$16.60
$17.20
$15.03
$14.10
$14.65
$13.60
$14.03
$12.90
2022
2021
Public Safety Neighborhoods and Housing
Economic Development Environment
Community Wellness and Open Space Transportation and Transit Q15. I am going to ask you to imagine you are in charge of Milpitas’ City budget. Every year, the City needs to prioritize funding various services. For this exercise, assume you have $100 to spend on 6 priority areas. Please tell me how many dollars out of 100 you would spend on each one, keeping in mind that the total must add up to $100.

Mean Dollar Amount Over Time
Slightly more funding is given to environment,
community wellness, and transportation in
2022 compared to 2021.
50 $21.98
$22.48
$19.71
$19.49
$22.91
$24.91
$25.88
$17.45
$17.05
$19.18
$16.93
$16.11
$16.57
$16.28
$16.88
$16.37
$16.97
$17.31
$15.82
$16.98
$15.63
$14.49
$15.39
$15.04
$16.25
$14.50
$15.06
$14.46
$14.70
$14.88
$13.67
$14.92
$16.13
$13.86
$14.74
$14.49
$13.83
$15.43
$15.10
$14.52
$12.62
$13.01
Men
Women
Ages 18-29
Ages 30-39
Ages 40-49
Ages 50-64
Ages 65+
Public Safety Neighborhoods and Housing Economic Development Environment Community Wellness and Open Space Transportation and Transit Q15. I am going to ask you to imagine you are in charge of Milpitas’ City budget. Every year, the City needs to prioritize funding various services. For this exercise, assume you have $100 to spend on 6 priority areas. Please tell me how many dollars out of 100 you would spend on each one, keeping in mind that the total must add up to $100.

Mean Dollar Amount by Gender & Age
Older residents are more likely to prioritize
public safety; younger residents are more
likely to prioritize housing.
51 $27.31
$19.98
$22.97
$20.03
$21.15
$19.84
$15.66
$18.45
$16.08
$19.38
$16.01
$18.06
$14.49
$16.90
$16.50
$15.27
$17.87
$17.17
$15.67
$14.82
$15.40
$16.15
$15.07
$14.45
$13.72
$15.27
$15.79
$14.37
$14.06
$14.11
$13.15
$14.59
$13.25
$14.79
$15.83
$16.37
White Residents (14%)
Latino Residents (13%)
Chinese Residents (14%)
Filipino Residents (12%)
Indian Residents (13%)
Vietnamese Residents
(14%)
Public Safety Neighborhoods and Housing Economic Development Environment Community Wellness and Open Space Transportation and Transit Q15. I am going to ask you to imagine you are in charge of Milpitas’ City budget. Every year, the City needs to prioritize funding various services. For this exercise, assume you have $100 to spend on 6 priority areas. Please tell me how many dollars out of 100 you would spend on each one, keeping in mind that the total must add up to $100.

Mean Dollar Amount by Race/Ethnicity (% of Milpitas population) White residents are especially
likely to prioritize public safety.
52 53
Q16.

Over the last two years, have you had contact with a City department or agency in person, on the phone, or via email? Yes
32% No
63%
Don't
Know
5%
Those Most Likely to Have Had
Contact:
• Ages 75+ (47%)
• Lived in Milpitas 41+ years
(46%)
• White residents (45%)
• HH Income $150K+ (44%)
One in three residents had contact with a City
department or agency in the last 2 years.
54 Q17.

Would you say that you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, not too satisfied, or not at all satisfied with the overall level of customer service you received? 43%
39%
34%
48%
35%
38%
42%
29%
14%
10%
9%
11%
8%
12%
12%
10%
2022
2021
2020
2019
Very Sat. Smwt. Sat. Don't Know Not Too Sat. Not at All Sat. Total Sat.

Total
Not Sat.
78% 22%
77% 23%
76% 21%
77% 21%
Those more likely to have been not satisfied are residents ages 50-74 (29%), those who’ve lived in Milpitas for 31-40 years (28%), and Indian residents (27%). (Asked of Those with an Interaction with the City, n=223) Residents remain very broadly satisfied
with the customer service they received.
55 Traffic is the most mentioned issue;
crime, housing, and communication follow.
17%
10%
8%
8%
7%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
3%
3%
3%
2%
2%
12%
1%
7%
8%
Q18.

In your opinion, what is the most important thing the City of Milpitas can do to improve City services for the people who live and/or work in Milpitas? (Open-Ended; Responses 2% and Above Shown)
Infrastructure/road and traffic issues
Addressing crime/public safety
Addressing housing/renting issues
Interacting with residents/communication/more community input Homelessness/poverty
More businesses/economic growth
Environmental issues/blight/litter
Improve customer support services/accessibility
Improve police services/presence
Control growth/development
Better city management/working city government
Remove garbage dumps/fix dump smell
More info on services offered/updated
Reduce rates/fees (services, water, sewage, garbage disposal) Preserve open spaces/parks
Other
None/Nothing
Don't know/Unsure
Refused
56 57
Big Picture Takeaways
 Perceptions of life in Milpitas are generally positive and consistent with 2021.
 While residents across the Bay Area have reported lower quality of life ratings and higher perceptions of their cities going in the “wrong direction, the share of Milpitas residents who believe the City is going in the “right direction” has risen back to pre-COVID years.
 Large majorities continue to be proud City residents, view the City as accepting and diverse, among other positive attributes.  However,a majority doesn’t feel the City is “affordable.”  The share who believes the City is growing “too fast” has risen since 2021 but is still lower than in 2019.
58 Impressions of City Government
 Views of City government continue to be positive and the proportion of residents “approving” of City government overall has increased, slightly.
 Sixty-seven percent trust the City’s management of their tax dollars, 68% trust its planning for Milpitas’ future.
 Police, 911 response and infrastructure continue to rate as residents’ top priorities.
 Residents’ allocation of $100 to the budget suggests their ranked preferences are public safety, then neighborhoods/housing, economic development, environment, community wellness and open space, and transportation. Dollar allocation notably varies by age and race/ethnicity, though the ranking remains
somewhat consistent.
59 Impressions of Safety
 Ninety-four percent agree that maintaining public safety services should be a top priority.
 Residents feel safe doing most activities in Milpitas.  Perceptions of public safety peaked during the pandemic (early 2021) and have returned to pre-pandemic levels.
 More than four in five were satisfied with their
interactions with police officers for a wide array of
reasons. Among the minority who were dissatisfied,
unprofessionalism and insensitivity were most often-
mentioned.
60 Potential Areas of Focus
While solid majorities of residents are satisfied with these city services, if the results suggest any areas that may warrant additional attention, they include the following:
 Providing recreation opportunities and programs at City parks and recreation centers
 Developing policies to support affordable housing
 Providing rent relief to prevent residents from becoming homeless
 Removing blight & illegal dumping
 Paving and repairing streets and roads
Recommendation
Receive a report on results of the 2022 Citywide Community Engagement Survey.

City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
Milpitas City Council
Item #22: Receive Report on
American Rescue Plan Act
Investment Plan and Provide
Direction
March 15, 2022
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000
2 Presentation Outline
Background
Potential Changes to ARPA Investment Plan
Process for Future Changes to ARPA Investment Plan
Fiscal Impact and Staff Recommendation
Council Discussion
3 Background
May-June 2021: Council provided feedback on investment priorities for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding
June 21, 2021: Council approved the ARPA Investment Framework August 9, 2021: Council approved the ARPA Investment Plan January 11, 2022: Council approved modifications to the ARPA Investment Plan
February 15, 2022: Preliminary discussion, item was continued to March 1
Based on January 25 FY 22-23 Budget Study Session and as part of FY 22-23 budget development, Council may want to consider changes to the ARPA Investment Plan
4 ARPA Five Investment Areas $16.7 M

5 ARPA Investment Plan
5 6
ARPA Investment Plan (contd.)
6 7
Potential Changes to
ARPA Investment Plan
8 Business Improvement District
Council consideration of $75,000 in ARPA funding for a Main Street Business Improvement District (BID) feasibility analysis and technical support
Contingent on majority vote of property owners/businesses An economic development tool to fund services such as cleaning streets, providing security, making capital improvements, construction of pedestrian and streetscape enhancements, various public infrastructure improvements, restoring and re-establishing historic districts, and marketing the area
On 2/14/2022, EDTC discussed establishing a BID and the response was favorable as it would complement Main St.
revitalization/branding, the Specific Plan, and spur economic vitality BID is aligned w/the City Council approved Economic Development Strategy (Action 31.3/6) and General Plan 2040 (ED-2c)
9 Unhoused Services
Council consideration of up to $100,000 to continue services with Santa Clara County Office of Supportive Housing and the County’s Homeless Engagement and Access Team (HEAT)
Current contract for $200,000 with the County runs through June Homeless outreach, assessment, street-based case management services began in March 2021;
• 124 unhoused clients have been assessed through January 2022 32 individuals referred to housing program:
• 7 permanently housed;
• 7 in housing search;
• 8 in applications process,
• 10 have been referred to housing but not yet located
10 Unhoused Services – Funding Options
Given significant proactive effort in first year of services, a lower level of funding need is anticipated
$100,000 contract with the County to continue services: will fund 1 FTE for outreach and assessment for 1 year; quarterly reporting
$50,000 contract with the County will fund 0.5 FTE for 1 year:
increased response time and decreased flexibility for Milpitas referrals; quarterly reporting
No contract with the County: Milpitas referrals will be considered as part of County wide referrals, no expedited response time or any reporting. Milpitas referrals cannot go directly to service provider
11 Other Cities Contracting with County
City Contract
Amount Services
Morgan Hill $50,000 Outreach (in FY 23 this funding will be shifting to homelessness prevention)
Mountain
View $585,000
Intensive Case Management for Permanent Supportive Housing ($125,000)
Outreach ($60,000)
Safe Parking ($400,000)
Santa Clara $125,000 Intensive Case Management for Permanent Supportive Housing San Jose $1,000,000 Intensive Case Management for Permanent Supportive Housing 12 Milpitas Sustainable Neighbor
Education Program
Council consideration of $60,000 in ARPA funding for the Milpitas Sustainable Neighbor Education Program
Intended to support City’s Climate Action Plan; increase awareness of existing City programs; and foster behavior change to help reduce GHG emissions
Provide grants, training and technical assistance to 8 - 10 volunteers from different housing types
Highlight lessons learned from the program and share with Milpitas community
13 Parks Rehabilitation
Council consideration of $350,000 in ARPA funding for short- term repairs and improvements of Oliver W. Jones and
Hidden Lakes Parks
• Remaining two parks, which were classified to be in poor condition in the Council approved Parks Master Plan
21 Parks are already funded by $4.3 M in ARPA funding
May be challenging to fund this amount through de-funding of other ARPA programs
14 Potential Re-Allocation
 Since ARPA Investment Plan was approved in
August 2021 staff has been working with AG Witt
on compliance and reporting
 Staff has also had an opportunity to research and
evaluate specific programs
15 Main Street Revitalization
$500,000 in ARPA Investment Plan; $400,000 for Storefront Improvement Program and $100,000 for other items related to Main Street Revitalization
Pilot Storefront Improvement Program funded by $50,000 from Community Benefit Fund currently underway
Based on preliminary issues identified, potential interest from businesses, staff capacity, and ARPA deadline, staff is recommending $300,000 for Storefront Improvement
Program and
$65,000 for other items related to revitalization. That provides $135,000 for other consideration.

Council may want to consider re-allocating $75,000 for BID study and $60,000 for Sustainable Neighbor Education Program
BID will support long term revitalization strategy
16 Milpitas Chamber of Commerce
$200,000 allocated to the Milpitas Chamber of Commerce to support the business community in Milpitas; Chamber was to intended to be classified as a beneficiary
Funding for specific events and programs and associated resources
Events are still in flux due to the continuing pandemic, availability of resources, and participation levels by the business community
If classified as a sub-recipient, competitive selection and rigorous tracking and reporting
17 Milpitas Chamber of Commerce (contd.)
Two tranches of $100,000 each, may fund staff
First tranche (Year 1) upon execution of a grant agreement; second tranche (Year 2) contingent on a successful first year; to be considered as part of the overall ARPA funding
priorities.

Staffing will be additive and enhance current staffing levels Additional staff to assist local businesses negatively impacted by the pandemic through programs, initiatives, and events for business resilience and recovery
Chamber will fundraise to ensure sustained staffing levels after ARPA funding has been depleted
18 Staff Marketing & Outreach

1. Bay Area News Group database email blast –2/24/22

2. Mercury News Online Display Campaign – Online banner ads

3. Milpitas Post – Print ad through mailing & publication 2/25/22

4. Clear Channel Highway 880 Billboards –2/23/22 to 3/1/22

5. Connected Article – 24,390 households - week of 2/21/22

6. Constant Contact 4 email blasts – businesses/community members

7. City Website – banner ad on City’s homepage on 2/15/2022

8. Milpitas Matters – blurb written for 2/4/22 distribution

9. Press Releases – 2 media releases to promote the program

10. Canvassing – staff delivered flyers to various businesses

11. Economic Development & Trade Commission –
presentations

12. Milpitas Rotary Club Presentation – 2/28/22

13. SV Central Chamber of Commerce – web post, social media, email blasts & mailed 440 postcards to Milpitas businesses

14. Milpitas Chamber of Commerce – Hot Topics & info for Board

15. Technical Assistance Workshop –staff/SV Central Chamber helped small businesses apply in-person at City Hall – 3/1/22

19 350 Grant Applications Received

20 Small Business Assistance Grant Update
March 1, 2022 - application period closes with 350 applications 25% of all applications were received in the first 3 days 44% of all applications were received in the final 10 days Business license compliance & no code enforcement issues There may be sufficient applications to proceed with grant award disbursement under one tranche. Proceeding with one tranche or two tranches is subject to change and will be determined by Staff SB 234 (Effective Jan. 1, 2020) - prohibits local jurisdictions from imposing a business license, fee, or tax for the privilege of operating a family daycare home
Home-based daycare centers are considered residential uses City Council Info Memo (March 10, 2022) - home-based daycare businesses are exempt from business license eligibility requirement Outreach to home-based daycare businesses & accepting applications in this category through March 24, 2022
21 Rental and Mortgage Assistance
$1.2 million in funding approved by Council for Milpitas Rental and Mortgage Assistance program
State and Federal funding sources for rental and mortgage assistance
Prior Council direction to maximize leveraging other
governmental resources and to not allow duplication of
assistance for this program
Council may want to consider reducing the funding for this program by up to $100,000 and reallocating up to $100,000 to continue the unhoused services with the County.

Would enable the City to continue assisting the unhoused who may also have been negatively impacted by the
pandemic.
22 Community Events
$200,000 allocated to Community Events
$71,500 is committed; $128,500 available over a 3-year
timeframe
Event Category FY 21-22 FY 22-23 FY 23-24 Total
4th of July Add-ons (Parade for one
year; Ferris Wheel for three years)
$55,000 $10,000 $10,000 $75,000
Four Pop-Up Events (earth Day, Art
Walk, Camping Night)
$3,500 $9,000 $9,000 $24,000
Cultural Events (Holi, Lantern
Festival, Day of the Dead)
$0 $10,000 $10,000 $20,000
Marketing $2,000 $5,000 $5,000 $12,000
TOTAL 60,500 $34,000 $34,000 $128,500
23 Community Events (con’t)
Ferris Wheel & Parade
Estimated initial budgets - $75,000
Staff conducted the required RFP for the Ferris Wheel rental with responses due by March 3. No proposals were received. Staff initial outreach revealed potential challenges:
• to competing fairs on or around 4th of July – which offer a longer duration and contract for the vendor; high demand could result in higher than budgeted bids and/or no vendor
• Federal procurement regulation require re-soliciting of the requirements even though no proposals were received
• Insufficient resources in the Police, Public Works, and Recreation and Community Services departments to plan and stage the 4 th of July event and a parade.

Alternative Use of ARPA Allocation
3 Day Summer Roller Skating Event approved by Council as a priority item; cost estimated at $105,000
• $75,000 of ARPA funds could be used to offset the General Fund cost. 24 Proposed Process for
Future Changes to
ARPA Investment Plan
25 Administrative Processing for Milpitas
ARPA Programs

1. Evaluate and verify eligible use of funds per Treasury Final Rules

2. Evaluate beneficiary versus sub-recipient award and requirements thereof

3. Develop program resources (i.e. staffing, services, supplies)

4. Evaluate one-time versus on-going program and budget implications

5. Develop program eligibility requirements, evaluation, selection and award

6. Development program plan and implementation

7. Develop public outreach and program promotion campaign

8. Evaluate and comply with Federal Procurement requirements

9. Monitor grant recipients

10.Obtain, retain and summarize grant documentation
26 Administrative Processing for Milpitas
ARPA Programs (contd.)

11.Develop and execute contracts (i.e. grant award agreements)

12.Submit mandatory reports to U.S. Treasury

13.Develop policies, procedures and risk management monitoring controls

14.Comply with tax requirements and reporting (receiving W9, issuing 1099, etc)

15.Develop accounting and disbursement methodology (fee subsidies, vendor disbursements, payroll project cost etc.)

16.Develop and update Milpitas ARPA website portal

17.Report to City Council on a periodic basis
27 Changes to ARPA Investment Plan
On August 9, Council approved the ARPA Investment Plan
and delegated authority to the City Manager to proceed with appropriation actions and contract approvals
Since funding is multi-year, an annual review of the ARPA Investment Plan, as part of budget development, is
recommended; will allow Council to consider in the context of all other budget priorities
Annual process will maximize efficacy of budget
management and service delivery
Fiscal year 2022-23 budget development is currently
underway hence staff is bringing re-allocation discussion for Council direction
28 Fiscal Impact and
Staff Recommendation
29 Fiscal Impact
ARPA allocation to the City is in the amount of $16,736,815.

Re-allocation of funding does not impact the total ARPA revenue and/or appropriation.

Leveraging ARPA funding for priority items may enable
funding of other services that would otherwise have to be funded by the General Fund.
30 Recommendation
Consider Council priority items for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding and provide direction to staff on any required modifications to the ARPA Investment Plan to allow for the additional allocation
Review and provide input to staff on proposed process for future changes to the ARPA Investment Plan
City of Milpitas
455 E. Calaveras Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035
www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov 408-586-3000

Milpitas City CouncilMarch 15, 2022

Milpitas City Council
March 15, 2022