Milpitas City Council
November 7, 2023

MT LAKE COUNTY $4,148.91
MT LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY $3,880.00
MT LEWISTOWN CITY $4,262.50
MT LIBBY CITY $674.32
MT LINCOLN COUNTY $3,178.02
MT LIVINGSTON CITY $3,690.00
MT MILES CITY $684.25
MT MISSOULA CITY $17,377.20
MT MONTANA $372.39
MT PETROLEUM COUNTY $1,004.76
MT RAVALLI COUNTY $8,331.21
MT ROSEBUD COUNTY $637.70
MT SHERIDAN COUNTY $2,096.00
MT TOOLE COUNTY $7,650.00
MT VALLEY COUNTY $950.00
MT WHITEFISH CITY $1,665.50
MT WOLF POINT CITY $1,794.00
Totals for MT(26 Jurisdictions): $126,097.48
NC ASHEBORO CITY $7,063.50
NC ASHEVILLE CITY $20,486.70
NC ATLANTIC BEACH TOWN $2,450.00
NC AVERY COUNTY $12,320.00
NC AYDEN TOWN $1,837.88
NC BEAUFORT TOWN $3,868.76
NC BELMONT CITY $6,547.54
NC BLACK MOUNTAIN TOWN $2,185.00
NC BLOWING ROCK TOWN $2,975.00
NC BOONE TOWN $6,516.50
NC BURLINGTON CITY $11,362.50
NC BURNSVILLE TOWN $1,700.00
NC CALDWELL COUNTY $22,396.57
NC CANTON TOWN $2,675.00
NC CARRBORO TOWN $2,523.44
NC CARY TOWN $2,449.05
NC CHAPEL HILL TOWN $7,650.00
NC CHEROKEE COUNTY $4,222.82
NC CHERRYVILLE CITY $3,230.36
NC CLAYTON TOWN $4,851.00
NC CLEVELAND COUNTY $759.99
NC CLINTON CITY $3,295.50
NC COLUMBUS COUNTY $17,029.57
NC COLUMBUS TOWN $1,220.15
NC CONCORD CITY $3,306.21
NC CURRITUCK COUNTY $12,829.36
NC DAVIE COUNTY $16,200.00
NC DUCK TOWN $2,694.21
NC DUNN CITY $6,506.67
NC DURHAM CITY $4,195.65
NC DURHAM COUNTY $2,210.38

NC EDEN CITY $4,077.25
NC EDENTON TOWN $2,617.48
NC ELIZABETHTOWN TOWN $2,713.92
NC ELKIN TOWN $7,408.90
NC ELON COLLEGE TOWN $3,242.50
NC EMERALD ISLE TOWN $13,160.08
NC FUQUAY-VARINA TOWN $10,049.06
NC GARNER TOWN $7,532.58
NC GOLDSBORO CITY $9,310.76
NC GRANVILLE COUNTY $12,917.50
NC GREENVILLE CITY $14,910.00
NC HAVELOCK CITY $2,355.00
NC HAW RIVER TOWN $4,645.00
NC HENDERSON CITY $9,051.00
NC HENDERSONVILLE CITY $10,283.50
NC HICKORY CITY $24,210.00
NC HIGH POINT CITY $3,227.81
NC HUNTERSVILLE TOWN $6,944.98
NC JACKSONVILLE CITY $27,630.00
NC KERNERSVILLE TOWN $9,550.00
NC KILL DEVIL HILLS TOWN $3,140.00
NC KINGS MOUNTAIN CITY $2,653.60
NC KURE BEACH TOWN $3,174.50
NC LELAND TOWN $3,302.28
NC LENOIR CITY $4,083.63
NC LUMBERTON CITY $10,125.00
NC MACON COUNTY $7,645.97
NC MADISON COUNTY $15,569.73
NC MARS HILL TOWN $1,615.65
NC MARTIN COUNTY $3,025.00
NC MAYODAN TOWN $1,475.00
NC MCDOWELL COUNTY $3,615.65
NC MECKLENBURG COUNTY $5,225.74
NC MINT HILL TOWN $13,325.00
NC MOORE COUNTY $962.54
NC MOORESVILLE TOWN $10,362.50
NC MOUNT HOLLY CITY $2,583.20
NC NAGS HEAD TOWN $1,220.00
NC NEW BERN CITY $10,488.19
NC NEWPORT TOWN $2,802.50
NC NORTH CAROLINA $2,787.15
NC NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH TOWN $1,871.04
NC OLD FORT TOWN $1,000.00
NC PASQUOTANK COUNTY $8,354.64
NC PERQUIMANS COUNTY $2,060.50
NC PERSON COUNTY $6,375.00
NC PILOT MOUNTAIN TOWN $6,350.00
NC PINEVILLE TOWN $6,349.53
NC RALEIGH CITY $23,250.13

NC REIDSVILLE CITY $8,966.75
NC RICHMOND COUNTY $3,471.25
NC ROANOKE RAPIDS CITY $5,303.57
NC ROCKINGHAM COUNTY $8,710.00
NC RUTHERFORD COUNTY $10,854.35
NC RUTHERFORDTON TOWN $6,375.00
NC SALISBURY CITY $8,200.00
NC SMITHFIELD TOWN $1,646.94
NC SOUTHERN PINES TOWN $6,142.73
NC SOUTHERN SHORES TOWN $828.35
NC SOUTHPORT CITY $3,025.32
NC SPENCER TOWN $4,635.68
NC SPINDALE TOWN $8,075.00
NC SPRUCE PINE TOWN $1,125.00
NC STALLINGS TOWN $1,375.00
NC STATESVILLE CITY $18,050.00
NC SUNSET BEACH TOWN $802.38
NC SUGAR MOUNTAIN VILLAGE $1,252.50
NC TARBORO TOWN $11,397.50
NC TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY $13,416.54
NC TRYON TOWN $2,975.00
NC WADESBORO TOWN $425.00
NC WAKE FOREST TOWN $8,590.45
NC WARSAW TOWN $2,600.00
NC WAXHAW TOWN $10,584.47
NC WENDELL TOWN $6,343.00
NC WILSON CITY $12,247.07
NC WILSON COUNTY $8,671.73
NC WILSON'S MILLS TOWN $3,207.05
NC WINSTON SALEM CITY $5,042.85
NC WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH TOWN $2,179.20
NC YOUNGSVILLE TOWN $1,685.81
NC ZEBULON TOWN $2,436.13
Totals for NC(113 Jurisdictions): $740,831.92
ND BENSON COUNTY $2,965.00
ND BISMARCK CITY $27,759.00
ND BOTTINEAU COUNTY $4,770.00
ND BURLEIGH COUNTY $4,675.00
ND DEVILS LAKE CITY $3,694.71
ND DICKINSON CITY $11,453.30
ND EMMONS COUNTY $1,699.02
ND GRAND FORKS CITY $6,705.00
ND GRAND FORKS COUNTY $3,255.00
ND MCKENZIE COUNTY $13,643.11
ND MERCER COUNTY $6,300.00
ND MINOT CITY $11,475.00
ND MORTON COUNTY $4,675.00
ND OAKES CITY $1,250.04
ND RAMSEY COUNTY $1,230.00

ND RENVILLE COUNTY $1,275.00
ND RICHLAND COUNTY $6,335.00
ND SHERIDAN COUNTY $1,135.00
ND STARK COUNTY $9,116.70
ND VALLEY CITY $3,422.37
ND WAHPETON CITY $2,095.00
ND WALSH COUNTY $4,060.55
ND WARD COUNTY $4,734.00
ND WATFORD CITY $5,425.00
Totals for ND(24 Jurisdictions): $143,147.80
NE AURORA CITY $1,167.72
NE BELLEVUE CITY $8,000.00
NE BLAIR CITY $1,350.00
NE BOONE COUNTY $337.00
NE BROKEN BOW CITY $534.75
NE BUFFALO COUNTY $2,337.50
NE CEDAR COUNTY $692.58
NE CHADRON CITY $1,700.00
NE COLUMBUS CITY $4,135.00
NE CRETE CITY $1,447.50
NE DAKOTA COUNTY $5,832.50
NE DIXON COUNTY $2,140.00
NE DODGE COUNTY $3,450.00
NE GOTHENBURG CITY $945.00
NE GRAND ISLAND CITY $11,992.50
NE HALL COUNTY $5,954.90
NE HASTINGS CITY $3,980.75
NE KEARNEY CITY $15,620.47
NE LA VISTA CITY $4,000.00
NE LEXINGTON CITY $2,425.00
NE LINCOLN COUNTY $7,615.00
NE NEMAHA COUNTY $1,189.50
NE NORFOLK CITY $2,500.00
NE NORTH PLATTE CITY $3,105.00
NE PAPILLION CITY $5,571.00
NE PERKINS COUNTY $2,125.00
NE PHELPS COUNTY $690.00
NE PLATTE COUNTY $2,050.00
NE PLATTSMOUTH CITY $1,268.21
NE RALSTON CITY $774.19
NE SIDNEY CITY $3,330.00
NE SOUTH SIOUX CITY $4,182.50
NE WASHINGTON COUNTY $4,950.00
NE WEST POINT CITY $790.09
Totals for NE(34 Jurisdictions): $118,183.66
NH ALTON TOWN $1,564.49
NH BARRINGTON TOWN $1,048.50
NH BEDFORD TOWN $5,470.00
NH BELMONT TOWN $1,197.00

NH BERLIN CITY $4,600.00
NH CHESHIRE COUNTY $2,437.50
NH CHESTER TOWN $2,158.00
NH CLAREMONT CITY $8,627.25
NH CONCORD CITY $13,537.50
NH DERRY TOWN $13,444.65
NH DOVER CITY $3,280.50
NH DUNBARTON TOWN $1,101.38
NH EPSOM TOWN $2,550.00
NH EXETER TOWN $2,402.40
NH FARMINGTON TOWN $4,455.00
NH FREMONT TOWN $2,062.50
NH GILFORD TOWN $2,943.89
NH HAMPTON FALLS TOWN $2,112.50
NH HANOVER TOWN $3,340.00
NH HAVERHILL TOWN $583.75
NH HILLSBORO TOWN $3,804.00
NH HOOKSETT TOWN $3,132.50
NH HUDSON TOWN $9,200.00
NH JAFFREY TOWN $2,408.00
NH KEENE CITY $4,275.00
NH LACONIA CITY $2,861.00
NH LEBANON CITY $928.75
NH LEE TOWN $2,402.40
NH LINCOLN TOWN $1,530.00
NH LISBON TOWN $992.52
NH LONDONDERRY TOWN $7,672.50
NH MASON TOWN $1,417.50
NH MERRIMACK TOWN $7,322.00
NH MILFORD TOWN $2,929.50
NH MONT VERNON TOWN $864.00
NH NASHUA CITY $33,929.50
NH NEWFIELDS TOWN $2,183.54
NH NEWMARKET TOWN $2,129.02
NH NORTH HAMPTON TOWN $2,015.00
NH NOTTINGHAM TOWN $2,600.00
NH PORTSMOUTH CITY $11,437.50
NH ROCHESTER CITY $10,060.88
NH RUMNEY TOWN $630.25
NH SANDOWN TOWN $2,802.00
NH SOMERSWORTH CITY $3,789.75
NH SPRINGFIELD TOWN $450.00
NH STRATHAM TOWN $598.68
NH WAKEFIELD TOWN $1,758.50
NH WARNER TOWN $1,700.00
NH WINDHAM TOWN $3,128.13
Totals for NH(50 Jurisdictions): $209,869.23
NJ ABERDEEN TOWNSHIP $5,170.59
NJ ABSECON CITY $4,000.00

NJ ALLENTOWN BOROUGH $1,200.00
NJ ANDOVER TOWNSHIP $750.00
NJ ASBURY PARK CITY $5,868.50
NJ ATLANTIC CITY $44,982.00
NJ ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS BOROUGH $1,618.50
NJ BARNEGAT TOWNSHIP $8,074.83
NJ BAYONNE CITY $46,922.40
NJ BEDMINSTER TOWNSHIP $2,189.50
NJ BELLEVILLE TOWNSHIP $9,968.75
NJ BELLMAWR BOROUGH $2,650.50
NJ BERGENFIELD BOROUGH $3,272.05
NJ BERKELEY TOWNSHIP $11,970.00
NJ BERLIN BOROUGH $850.00
NJ BERLIN TOWNSHIP $1,146.38
NJ BERNARDSVILLE BOROUGH $3,661.85
NJ BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP $14,513.80
NJ BLOOMINGDALE BOROUGH $2,633.00
NJ BOGOTA BOROUGH $2,975.00
NJ BOONTON TOWNSHIP $4,018.00
NJ BORDENTOWN CITY $3,707.07
NJ BORDENTOWN TOWNSHIP $1,579.05
NJ BOUND BROOK BOROUGH $6,167.72
NJ BRICK TOWNSHIP $20,529.60
NJ BRIDGETON CITY $3,805.59
NJ BRIGANTINE CITY $3,610.26
NJ BURLINGTON TOWNSHIP $14,664.86
NJ BUTLER BOROUGH $2,500.00
NJ CALDWELL BOROUGH $4,592.00
NJ CAPE MAY COUNTY $24,800.00
NJ CARLSTADT BOROUGH $2,975.00
NJ CARNEYS POINT TOWNSHIP $1,722.00
NJ CARTERET BOROUGH $10,317.42
NJ CHATHAM BOROUGH $1,820.00
NJ CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP $16,541.60
NJ CHESTER TOWNSHIP $1,603.12
NJ CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP $2,125.00
NJ CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP $5,282.20
NJ CLARK TOWNSHIP $1,300.00
NJ CLAYTON BOROUGH $1,204.00
NJ CLIFTON CITY $25,694.00
NJ CRESSKILL BOROUGH $1,722.00
NJ DELRAN TOWNSHIP $2,992.30
NJ DEMAREST BOROUGH $1,297.35
NJ DENVILLE TOWNSHIP $6,800.00
NJ DOVER TOWN $7,220.52
NJ DUMONT BOROUGH $5,956.65
NJ DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP $11,350.00
NJ EAST HANOVER TOWNSHIP $1,851.00
NJ EASTAMPTON TOWNSHIP $2,377.70

NJ EDGEWATER BOROUGH $6,805.50
NJ EGG HARBOR CITY $2,437.50
NJ EGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP $10,839.38
NJ ELK TOWNSHIP $643.87
NJ EMERSON BOROUGH $2,292.76
NJ ENGLEWOOD CITY $3,825.00
NJ ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS BOROUGH $2,125.00
NJ ESSEX FELLS BOROUGH $1,203.42
NJ EVESHAM TOWNSHIP $8,521.60
NJ EWING TOWNSHIP $11,868.05
NJ EAST WINDSOR TOWNSHIP $9,660.53
NJ FAIR HAVEN BOROUGH $7,170.00
NJ FAIR LAWN BOROUGH $1,786.00
NJ FAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP $1,997.50
NJ FAIRVIEW BOROUGH $3,330.80
NJ FANWOOD BOROUGH $573.19
NJ FLORENCE TOWNSHIP $1,373.00
NJ FLORHAM PARK BOROUGH $4,860.80
NJ FORT LEE BOROUGH $16,049.32
NJ FRANKLIN BOROUGH $2,400.00
NJ FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP $2,450.00
NJ FREEHOLD BOROUGH $3,219.35
NJ FREEHOLD TOWNSHIP $2,235.56
NJ GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP $6,878.28
NJ GARWOOD BOROUGH $1,558.10
NJ GLASSBORO BOROUGH $2,575.48
NJ GLOUCESTER CITY $2,125.00
NJ GREENWICH TOWNSHIP $2,125.00
NJ GUTTENBERG TOWN $10,347.40
NJ HACKENSACK CITY $10,751.04
NJ HACKETTSTOWN TOWN $3,353.00
NJ HADDON HEIGHTS BOROUGH $1,520.00
NJ HADDON TOWNSHIP $10,256.04
NJ HALEDON BOROUGH $2,438.18
NJ HAMBURG BOROUGH $2,730.00
NJ HAMILTON TOWNSHIP (MAYS LANDING) $5,125.00
NJ HAMILTON TOWNSHIP (TRENTON) $12,016.88
NJ HARDYSTON TOWNSHIP $4,382.55
NJ HARVEY CEDARS BOROUGH $835.00
NJ HASBROUCK HEIGHTS BOROUGH $7,822.23
NJ HAWTHORNE BOROUGH $5,554.89
NJ HAZLET TOWNSHIP $9,775.00
NJ HIGHTSTOWN BOROUGH $1,967.48
NJ HILLSBOROUGH TOWNSHIP $2,920.00
NJ HOBOKEN CITY $14,439.60
NJ HOLMDEL TOWNSHIP $7,068.60
NJ HOPATCONG BOROUGH $1,805.13
NJ HOWELL TOWNSHIP $32,214.00
NJ IRVINGTON TOWNSHIP $12,339.00

NJ JACKSON TOWNSHIP $7,445.19
NJ JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP $2,292.76
NJ KEANSBURG BOROUGH $5,868.50
NJ KENILWORTH BOROUGH $1,960.00
NJ KINNELON BOROUGH $1,462.91
NJ LACEY TOWNSHIP $11,606.40
NJ LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP $4,174.50
NJ LINDEN CITY $8,000.00
NJ LINWOOD CITY $1,139.56
NJ LITTLE EGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP $4,592.00
NJ LITTLE FALLS TOWNSHIP $1,966.25
NJ LIVINGSTON TOWNSHIP $25,500.00
NJ LODI BOROUGH $5,200.00
NJ LOGAN TOWNSHIP $4,879.00
NJ LONG HILL TOWNSHIP $9,435.65
NJ LOWER TOWNSHIP $6,255.00
NJ LYNDHURST TOWNSHIP $3,839.00
NJ MADISON BOROUGH $4,278.40
NJ MAGNOLIA BOROUGH $1,719.57
NJ MANALAPAN TOWNSHIP $8,024.52
NJ MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP $13,788.60
NJ MANSFIELD TOWNSHIP $1,700.00
NJ MANTOLOKING BOROUGH $1,489.00
NJ MANTUA TOWNSHIP $3,112.50
NJ MANVILLE BOROUGH $5,422.56
NJ MAPLE SHADE TOWNSHIP $5,496.08
NJ MAPLEWOOD TOWNSHIP $10,450.00
NJ MARLBORO TOWNSHIP $6,886.00
NJ MAYWOOD BOROUGH $2,694.96
NJ MEDFORD TOWNSHIP $3,174.40
NJ MERCHANTVILLE BOROUGH $1,950.00
NJ METUCHEN BOROUGH $2,569.05
NJ MIDDLE TOWNSHIP $8,671.50
NJ MIDDLESEX BOROUGH $2,275.52
NJ MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP $37,620.12
NJ MILLVILLE CITY $11,380.00
NJ MONROE TOWNSHIP $5,450.94
NJ MONTCLAIR TOWNSHIP $25,110.93
NJ MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP $2,632.00
NJ MONTVILLE TOWNSHIP $3,825.00
NJ MOORESTOWN TOWNSHIP $5,882.80
NJ MORRIS PLAINS BOROUGH $572.60
NJ MORRIS TOWNSHIP $5,546.25
NJ MOUNT EPHRAIM BOROUGH $1,191.00
NJ MOUNT LAUREL TOWNSHIP $2,932.80
NJ MOUNT OLIVE TOWNSHIP $9,447.20
NJ MOUNTAIN LAKES BOROUGH $616.25
NJ NEPTUNE CITY BOROUGH $1,283.10
NJ NEPTUNE TOWNSHIP $12,650.30

NJ NEW MILFORD BOROUGH $1,955.20
NJ NEW PROVIDENCE BOROUGH $6,305.09
NJ NEWTON TOWN $2,550.00
NJ NORTH ARLINGTON BOROUGH $3,024.05
NJ NORTH BERGEN TOWNSHIP $9,030.00
NJ NORTH BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP $6,377.28
NJ NORTH CALDWELL BOROUGH $1,344.00
NJ NORTH HALEDON BOROUGH $1,200.00
NJ NORTH PLAINFIELD BOROUGH $2,740.71
NJ NORTHFIELD CITY $3,029.94
NJ NORTHVALE BOROUGH $5,950.00
NJ NUTLEY TOWNSHIP $4,183.65
NJ OAKLAND BOROUGH $5,236.00
NJ OAKLYN BOROUGH $930.00
NJ OCEAN CITY $5,604.50
NJ OCEAN TOWNSHIP (OAKHURST) $4,941.72
NJ OCEAN TOWNSHIP (WARETOWN) $5,150.96
NJ OLD BRIDGE TOWNSHIP $18,250.00
NJ OLD TAPPAN BOROUGH $2,630.35
NJ ORANGE CITY TOWNSHIP $19,600.00
NJ PALISADES PARK BOROUGH $2,337.50
NJ PARAMUS BOROUGH $9,025.65
NJ PARK RIDGE BOROUGH $1,600.00
NJ PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS TOWNSHIP $19,500.00
NJ PASSAIC CITY $14,745.50
NJ PAULSBORO BOROUGH $4,042.75
NJ PEAPACK GLADSTONE BOROUGH $1,148.00
NJ PEMBERTON BOROUGH $1,800.00
NJ PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP $5,431.51
NJ PENNSAUKEN TOWNSHIP $3,801.00
NJ PENNSVILLE TOWNSHIP $1,897.50
NJ PEQUANNOCK TOWNSHIP $5,028.80
NJ PERTH AMBOY CITY $23,474.00
NJ PINE HILL BOROUGH $2,292.76
NJ PISCATAWAY TOWNSHIP $6,878.28
NJ PLAINFIELD CITY $14,163.90
NJ PLAINSBORO TOWNSHIP $2,363.63
NJ PLEASANTVILLE CITY $8,723.40
NJ PLUMSTED TOWNSHIP $1,090.95
NJ POINT PLEASANT BOROUGH $5,348.00
NJ RAHWAY CITY $7,069.86
NJ RAMSEY BOROUGH $7,924.00
NJ RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP $980.00
NJ RARITAN BOROUGH $2,650.50
NJ RARITAN TOWNSHIP $2,114.00
NJ RED BANK BOROUGH $3,000.00
NJ RIDGEFIELD BOROUGH $2,848.90
NJ RIDGEFIELD PARK VILLAGE $543.74
NJ RINGWOOD BOROUGH $4,792.20

NJ RIVER EDGE BOROUGH $5,397.00
NJ RIVER VALE TOWNSHIP $2,692.00
NJ RIVERDALE BOROUGH $1,009.98
NJ RIVERTON BOROUGH $945.55
NJ ROSELAND BOROUGH $2,105.00
NJ ROSELLE PARK BOROUGH $2,019.96
NJ ROXBURY TOWNSHIP $16,723.14
NJ RUTHERFORD BOROUGH $8,538.98
NJ SADDLE BROOK TOWNSHIP $15,225.00
NJ SADDLE RIVER BOROUGH $3,444.00
NJ SALEM CITY $1,990.00
NJ SALEM COUNTY $18,845.57
NJ SCOTCH PLAINS TOWNSHIP $4,250.40
NJ SECAUCUS TOWN $7,422.80
NJ SOMERDALE BOROUGH $1,514.97
NJ SOUTH BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP $3,808.00
NJ SOUTH HACKENSACK TOWNSHIP $488.80
NJ SOUTH ORANGE VILLAGE TOWNSHIP $9,025.65
NJ SOUTH RIVER BOROUGH $4,533.57
NJ SPARTA TOWNSHIP $3,200.00
NJ SPRING LAKE HTS BOROUGH $5,500.00
NJ SUMMIT CITY $2,272.20
NJ TEANECK TOWNSHIP $5,798.00
NJ TENAFLY BOROUGH $3,360.84
NJ TRENTON CITY $51,564.16
NJ UNION BEACH BOROUGH $2,000.00
NJ UNION CITY $42,296.80
NJ UNION TOWNSHIP $34,445.00
NJ UPPER SADDLE RIVER BOROUGH $2,741.25
NJ VERNON TOWNSHIP $5,972.40
NJ VINELAND CITY $21,996.00
NJ VOORHEES TOWNSHIP $11,086.60
NJ WALDWICK BOROUGH $1,552.24
NJ WALL TOWNSHIP $10,729.60
NJ WALLINGTON BOROUGH $1,955.20
NJ WARREN TOWNSHIP $3,318.15
NJ WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP (LONG VALLEY) $5,000.00
NJ WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP (SEWELL) $10,317.42
NJ WAYNE TOWNSHIP $9,632.00
NJ WEEHAWKEN TOWNSHIP $17,195.70
NJ WEST DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP $4,039.92
NJ WEST LONG BRANCH BOROUGH $3,438.00
NJ WEST MILFORD TOWNSHIP $3,387.66
NJ WEST NEW YORK TOWN $17,500.00
NJ WEST ORANGE TOWNSHIP $13,995.45
NJ WEST PATERSON BOROUGH $5,958.00
NJ WEST WILDWOOD BOROUGH $800.00
NJ WESTAMPTON TOWNSHIP $6,603.03
NJ WESTFIELD TOWN $14,005.80

NJ WESTWOOD BOROUGH $4,012.33
NJ WHARTON BOROUGH $3,925.44
NJ WILDWOOD CITY $8,994.00
NJ WILDWOOD CREST BOROUGH $4,922.50
NJ WINSLOW TOWNSHIP $9,171.04
NJ WOODBURY CITY $6,110.00
NJ WOODCLIFF LAKE BOROUGH $2,104.28
Totals for NJ(254 Jurisdictions): $1,722,126.50
NM ALAMOGORDO CITY $10,624.95
NM BERNALILLO COUNTY $5,510.35
NM BERNALILLO TOWN $3,843.00
NM BLOOMFIELD CITY $8,010.00
NM BOSQUE FARMS VILLAGE $2,799.00
NM CLOVIS CITY $11,640.00
NM CURRY COUNTY $16,695.00
NM DEMING CITY $4,846.50
NM EDDY COUNTY $15,120.00
NM FARMINGTON CITY $24,650.00
NM GRANT COUNTY $5,418.00
NM HOBBS CITY $31,440.00
NM LINCOLN COUNTY $8,217.00
NM LOGAN VILLAGE $422.96
NM LOS LUNAS VILLAGE $3,260.00
NM LOS ALAMOS COUNTY $7,807.92
NM RIO ARRIBA COUNTY $3,150.00
NM RUIDOSO VILLAGE $3,442.50
NM SANTA FE CITY $31,626.00
NM SANTA FE COUNTY $1,633.89
NM TAOS TOWN $4,131.00
NM VALENCIA COUNTY $9,862.50
Totals for NM(22 Jurisdictions): $214,150.57
NV BOULDER CITY $4,556.00
NV CLARK COUNTY SCH DIST $1,038.24
NV ELKO CITY $1,700.00
NV ELKO COUNTY $13,500.00
NV EUREKA COUNTY $3,870.00
NV FALLON CITY $4,024.96
NV HUMBOLDT COUNTY $18,170.00
NV LANDER COUNTY $8,535.00
NV LYON COUNTY $27,029.74
NV MESQUITE CITY $5,410.00
NV NEVADA $1,535.41
NV RENO CITY $2,335.14
NV STOREY COUNTY $13,374.88
NV WINNEMUCCA CITY $5,862.50
Totals for NV(14 Jurisdictions): $110,941.87
NY ALBANY CITY $73,796.13
NY ALFRED VILLAGE $4,919.60
NY ALLEGANY COUNTY $5,027.46

NY AMITYVILLE VILLAGE $2,400.00
NY AMSTERDAM CITY $4,950.00
NY ARCADE VILLAGE $1,765.80
NY AUBURN CITY $16,150.00
NY AVON VILLAGE $225.00
NY BALLSTON SPA VILLAGE $7,630.00
NY BATAVIA CITY $5,153.70
NY BEACON CITY $4,494.75
NY BEDFORD TOWN $1,399.00
NY BINGHAMTON CITY $17,425.00
NY BLASDELL VILLAGE $2,745.00
NY BOONVILLE VILLAGE $1,774.50
NY BREWSTER VILLAGE $3,150.00
NY BROCKPORT VILLAGE $715.95
NY BRONXVILLE VILLAGE $2,871.18
NY CAMBRIDGE VILLAGE $373.00
NY CAMILLUS TOWN $6,385.50
NY CANANDAIGUA CITY $2,122.20
NY CARMEL TOWN $5,755.90
NY CATTARAUGUS COUNTY $12,125.00
NY CAYUGA COUNTY $6,037.50
NY CAYUGA HEIGHTS VILLAGE $4,498.20
NY CHATHAM VILLAGE $6,055.76
NY CHEEKTOWAGA TOWN $7,840.75
NY CHEMUNG COUNTY $7,650.00
NY CHENANGO COUNTY $7,444.50
NY CHESTER TOWN $2,513.88
NY CICERO TOWN $4,000.00
NY CLARKSTOWN TOWN $24,220.60
NY CLINTON COUNTY $1,700.00
NY COHOES CITY $5,864.00
NY COLONIE TOWN $10,500.00
NY COLUMBIA COUNTY $10,625.00
NY CORFU VILLAGE $3,528.18
NY CORNING CITY $1,873.50
NY CORNWALL ON HUDSON VILLAGE $877.50
NY CORNWALL TOWN $2,450.00
NY CORTLAND CITY $5,748.00
NY CORTLAND COUNTY $8,041.00
NY CROTON ON HUDSON VILLAGE $3,150.00
NY CUBA TOWN $4,100.00
NY DANSVILLE VILLAGE $3,185.00
NY DE WITT TOWN $4,250.00
NY DELAWARE COUNTY $11,140.00
NY DEPEW VILLAGE $6,071.20
NY DOBBS FERRY VILLAGE $914.29
NY DOLGEVILLE VILLAGE $2,550.00
NY DUNKIRK CITY $3,149.60
NY EAST AURORA VILLAGE $2,347.29

NY EAST FISHKILL TOWN $4,250.00
NY EAST GREENBUSH TOWN $5,500.00
NY EAST HAMPTON TOWN $6,375.00
NY EASTCHESTER TOWN $3,918.00
NY ELMIRA CITY $10,784.45
NY ELMIRA HEIGHTS VILLAGE $2,607.45
NY ENDICOTT VILLAGE $6,611.75
NY EVANS TOWN $5,717.42
NY FALLSBURG TOWN $1,275.00
NY FRANKFORT TOWN $2,975.00
NY FRANKFORT VILLAGE $1,700.00
NY FRANKLIN COUNTY $1,400.00
NY FREEPORT VILLAGE $6,125.40
NY FULTON CITY $1,863.00
NY GARDEN CITY VILLAGE $6,491.94
NY GATES TOWN $2,863.80
NY GEDDES TOWN $2,698.02
NY GENESEO VILLAGE $1,894.00
NY GENEVA CITY $6,565.00
NY GLENVILLE TOWN $5,717.42
NY GOSHEN VILLAGE $3,160.00
NY GRAND ISLAND TOWN $2,017.50
NY GRANVILLE VILLAGE $4,417.50
NY GREAT NECK ESTATES VILLAGE $2,773.47
NY GREECE TOWN $21,785.40
NY GREENBURGH TOWN $1,271.46
NY GREENE COUNTY $4,125.00
NY GREENWOOD LAKE VILLAGE $906.75
NY GROTON VILLAGE $457.15
NY GUILDERLAND TOWN $4,919.24
NY HAMBURG TOWN $6,800.00
NY HARRIMAN VILLAGE $1,492.90
NY HEMPSTEAD VILLAGE $14,757.25
NY HIGHLAND FALLS VILLAGE $3,291.30
NY HOOSICK FALLS VILLAGE $4,000.00
NY HUDSON FALLS VILLAGE $2,550.00
NY HUNTINGTON BAY VILLAGE $1,776.90
NY HYDE PARK TOWN $2,540.44
NY ILION VILLAGE $3,900.00
NY INTERLAKEN VILLAGE $1,656.00
NY IRONDEQUOIT TOWN $6,712.50
NY JAMESTOWN CITY $3,719.50
NY JOHNSON CITY VILLAGE $3,895.50
NY KENMORE VILLAGE $2,863.00
NY LACKAWANNA CITY $5,378.70
NY LAKE SUCCESS VILLAGE $1,046.70
NY LANCASTER TOWN $5,950.00
NY LE ROY VILLAGE $3,680.80
NY LIBERTY VILLAGE $3,400.00

NY LITTLE FALLS CITY $2,219.64
NY LIVINGSTON COUNTY $12,298.00
NY LOCKPORT CITY $19,403.18
NY LONG BEACH CITY $1,800.00
NY MACEDON TOWN $2,817.50
NY MADISON COUNTY $25,850.00
NY MALVERNE VILLAGE $496.26
NY MAMARONECK TOWN $12,324.96
NY MAMARONECK VILLAGE $2,553.53
NY MANLIUS TOWN $4,712.40
NY MIDDLEPORT VILLAGE $1,900.00
NY MIDDLETOWN CITY $6,400.00
NY MOHAWK VILLAGE $1,062.00
NY MONROE VILLAGE $2,625.00
NY MONTGOMERY VILLAGE $2,054.34
NY MONTICELLO VILLAGE $4,125.00
NY MOUNT VERNON CITY $14,720.00
NY NEW BERLIN TOWN $1,702.80
NY NEW CASTLE TOWN $3,150.00
NY NEW HARTFORD TOWN $3,732.00
NY NEW PALTZ $4,250.00
NY NEW ROCHELLE CITY $26,283.75
NY NEW WINDSOR TOWN $7,225.00
NY NEW YORK MILLS VILLAGE $1,969.95
NY NEWARK VILLAGE $1,020.00
NY NEWBURGH CITY $8,500.00
NY NEWFANE TOWN $1,275.00
NY NISKAYUNA TOWN $3,040.24
NY NORTH CASTLE TOWN $5,250.00
NY NORTH GREENBUSH TOWN $3,060.00
NY NORTH SALEM TOWN $1,600.00
NY NORTH SYRACUSE VILLAGE $2,535.00
NY NORWICH CITY $1,700.00
NY OGDEN TOWN $1,275.00
NY OLD WESTBURY VILLAGE $3,958.00
NY ONEIDA CITY $4,987.50
NY ORISKANY VILLAGE $2,550.00
NY ORLEANS COUNTY $13,108.25
NY OSWEGO CITY $9,804.15
NY OWEGO VILLAGE $3,028.75
NY PALMYRA VILLAGE $4,250.00
NY PEEKSKILL CITY $6,688.98
NY PENN YAN VILLAGE $2,550.00
NY PIERMONT VILLAGE $850.00
NY PLATTSBURGH CITY $5,625.00
NY PORT CHESTER VILLAGE $1,568.15
NY PORT JERVIS CITY $5,700.00
NY POTSDAM VILLAGE $1,492.50
NY POUGHKEEPSIE CITY $17,000.00

NY POUGHKEEPSIE TOWN $8,954.70
NY PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DISTRICT $27,200.00
NY QUOGUE VILLAGE $1,417.50
NY RENSSELAER CITY $4,774.00
NY RHINEBECK VILLAGE $5,467.50
NY ROME CITY $8,428.00
NY ROTTERDAM TOWN $2,550.00
NY RYE BROOK VILLAGE $3,425.00
NY RYE CITY $4,794.50
NY SAG HARBOR VILLAGE $3,473.82
NY SARANAC LAKE VILLAGE $5,525.00
NY SAUGERTIES TOWN $8,450.00
NY SCHENECTADY CITY $34,844.42
NY SCHOHARIE COUNTY $11,001.50
NY SCOTIA VILLAGE $1,092.00
NY SENECA COUNTY $3,582.96
NY SENECA FALLS VILLAGE $1,956.00
NY SHELTER ISLAND TOWN $930.15
NY SHERRILL CITY $3,476.55
NY SLEEPY HOLLOW VILLAGE $3,282.96
NY SOLVAY VILLAGE $2,453.60
NY SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP $7,359.60
NY SOUTHAMPTON VILLAGE $13,291.41
NY SOUTHOLD TOWN $13,104.00
NY SPRING VALLEY VILLAGE $9,964.24
NY SPRINGVILLE VILLAGE $1,200.00
NY ST. REGIS BAND OF MOHAWK INDIANS $7,650.00
NY STEUBEN COUNTY $10,625.00
NY STONY POINT TOWN $2,550.00
NY SUFFERN VILLAGE $2,649.50
NY TARRYTOWN VILLAGE $850.00
NY TROY CITY $6,375.00
NY TUCKAHOE VILLAGE $2,444.00
NY TUPPER LAKE VILLAGE $937.50
NY ULSTER TOWN $3,505.60
NY VERNON VILLAGE $1,600.00
NY VESTAL TOWN $9,086.25
NY WALDEN VILLAGE $2,929.12
NY WALLKILL TOWN $3,242.32
NY WARWICK TOWN $9,200.00
NY WASHINGTON COUNTY $35,072.50
NY WATERFRONT COMM OF NEW YORK HARBOR $2,125.00
NY WATERLOO VILLAGE $1,619.40
NY WAVERLY VILLAGE $3,825.00
NY WAYNE COUNTY $14,875.00
NY WELLSVILLE VILLAGE $800.00
NY WEST SENECA TOWN $2,979.90
NY WESTHAMPTON BEACH VILLAGE $8,450.00
NY WHITE PLAINS CITY $19,963.60

NY WHITESBORO VILLAGE $2,125.00
NY WHITESTOWN TOWN $3,400.00
NY WOODSTOCK TOWN $2,125.00
NY WYOMING COUNTY $6,800.00
NY YATES COUNTY $11,550.00
NY YORKTOWN TOWN $7,393.20
Totals for NY(205 Jurisdictions): $1,215,097.16
OH ARCHBOLD VILLAGE $1,535.25
OH ASHLAND COUNTY $6,375.00
OH ASHTABULA CITY $17,389.35
OH ATHENS CITY $6,455.00
OH BARBERTON CITY $5,525.00
OH BAY VILLAGE CITY $2,479.00
OH BEACHWOOD CITY $7,683.33
OH BEAVERCREEK CITY $8,604.00
OH BEDFORD HEIGHTS CITY $5,225.00
OH BELLEFONTAINE CITY $711.25
OH BEXLEY CITY $2,612.50
OH BRECKSVILLE CITY $5,100.00
OH BRIMFIELD TOWNSHIP $6,575.55
OH BRUNSWICK HILLS TOWNSHIP $400.00
OH BUTLER TOWNSHIP $4,325.80
OH CANFIELD CITY $2,955.60
OH CANTON CITY $12,690.00
OH CARROLL VILLAGE $2,311.25
OH CHAGRIN FALLS VILLAGE $2,460.00
OH CHARDON VILLAGE $2,125.00
OH CHILLICOTHE CITY $3,748.60
OH CLEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP $3,037.50
OH COITSVILLE TOWNSHIP $3,400.00
OH COLERAIN TOWNSHIP $8,747.92
OH CORTLAND CITY $1,660.00
OH DEER PARK CITY $2,040.00
OH DEFIANCE CITY $2,452.98
OH DELAWARE CITY $10,371.08
OH DELHI TOWNSHIP $6,332.50
OH DOYLESTOWN VILLAGE $1,200.00
OH DUBLIN CITY $2,446.50
OH EUCLID CITY $17,425.00
OH FAIRFIELD CITY $9,729.00
OH FAIRLAWN CITY $5,344.05
OH FINDLAY CITY $6,190.48
OH FOREST PARK CITY $4,392.00
OH GALLIA COUNTY $4,250.00
OH GENOA TOWNSHIP $3,292.50
OH GOSHEN TOWNSHIP $1,382.33
OH GREENVILLE CITY $5,400.00
OH GROVE CITY $7,244.93
OH GROVEPORT VILLAGE $1,850.30

OH HANCOCK COUNTY $9,248.50
OH HIGHLAND HEIGHTS CITY $2,479.90
OH HILLIARD CITY $4,700.00
OH HILLSBORO CITY $2,180.48
OH HIRAM VILLAGE $2,843.10
OH HOCKING COUNTY $17,543.25
OH HOLLAND VILLAGE $2,500.00
OH HOWLAND TOWNSHIP $7,030.00
OH HUBER HEIGHTS CITY $5,848.24
OH HURON COUNTY $2,133.00
OH JACKSON TOWNSHIP $6,375.00
OH KENTON CITY $1,091.52
OH LAKEWOOD CITY $4,360.00
OH LANCASTER CITY $11,937.50
OH LIMA CITY $11,050.00
OH LOGAN COUNTY $5,345.43
OH LORAIN CITY $1,060.00
OH LUCKEY VILLAGE $1,266.66
OH LYNDHURST CITY $4,328.25
OH MANSFIELD CITY $6,800.00
OH MAPLE HEIGHTS CITY $6,525.00
OH MARIEMONT VILLAGE $1,200.00
OH MARIETTA CITY $4,675.00
OH MARYSVILLE CITY $5,169.19
OH MASON CITY $4,038.00
OH MAUMEE CITY $5,100.00
OH MAYFIELD VILLAGE $4,339.83
OH MEDINA CITY $10,819.00
OH MENTOR CITY $9,129.25
OH MIAMI TOWNSHIP $5,713.00
OH MIAMISBURG CITY $5,904.38
OH MONROE CITY $2,460.63
OH MORAINE CITY $2,380.75
OH MORELAND HILLS VILLAGE $2,250.00
OH MORROW VILLAGE $3,697.50
OH MOUNT HEALTHY CITY $1,428.00
OH MUSKINGUM COUNTY $7,603.12
OH NEWARK CITY $3,400.00
OH NORTH OLMSTED CITY $15,400.00
OH NORTHFIELD VILLAGE $4,200.00
OH OBERLIN CITY $1,700.00
OH OREGON CITY $5,634.00
OH OTTAWA COUNTY $5,773.37
OH OTTAWA HILLS VILLAGE $4,619.25
OH OXFORD CITY $3,825.00
OH PARMA CITY $6,242.00
OH PERRY TOWNSHIP $4,947.15
OH PERRYSBURG CITY $4,250.00
OH PICKAWAY COUNTY $11,154.38

OH PIQUA CITY $3,075.72
OH PERRY TOWNSHIP $2,078.48
OH RAVENNA CITY $3,706.50
OH REMINDERVILLE VILLAGE $1,246.33
OH REYNOLDSBURG CITY $9,222.50
OH SANDUSKY CITY $16,030.00
OH SANDUSKY COUNTY $17,000.00
OH SENECA COUNTY $19,261.63
OH SHAKER HEIGHTS CITY $9,306.00
OH SHARONVILLE CITY $8,375.00
OH SHELBY CITY $897.50
OH SIDNEY CITY $12,892.08
OH SILVER LAKE VILLAGE $1,275.00
OH SOUTH EUCLID CITY $4,689.00
OH SPRINGFIELD CITY $23,550.93
OH STOW CITY $3,272.35
OH STRUTHERS CITY $3,278.25
OH SYLVANIA TOWNSHIP $6,487.50
OH TROTWOOD CITY $7,285.00
OH TROY CITY $3,827.64
OH TUSCARAWAS COUNTY $6,339.50
OH TALLMADGE $6,075.00
OH UNION CITY $1,080.82
OH UNION COUNTY $7,612.80
OH UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS CITY $2,537.50
OH UPPER ARLINGTON CITY $4,754.25
OH URBANA CITY $800.00
OH VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE $1,324.50
OH VANDALIA CITY $7,081.95
OH VERMILION CITY $2,125.00
OH WADSWORTH CITY $2,550.00
OH WALTON HILLS VILLAGE $1,880.00
OH WARREN CITY $4,674.00
OH WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS CITY $2,000.00
OH WASHINGTON COUNTY $10,800.00
OH WEST MILTON VILLAGE $1,247.32
OH WESTERVILLE CITY $4,250.00
OH WHITEHALL CITY $12,650.00
OH WILLOUGHBY CITY $8,500.00
OH WILLOUGHBY HILLS CITY $7,022.50
OH WORTHINGTON CITY $6,025.00
OH XENIA CITY $2,550.00
OH YOUNGSTOWN CITY $12,800.00
Totals for OH(134 Jurisdictions): $752,611.73
OK ADA CITY $5,649.00
OK ARDMORE CITY $2,125.00
OK BARTLESVILLE CITY $8,682.50
OK BETHANY CITY $10,791.00
OK BIXBY CITY $4,927.50

OK CANADIAN COUNTY $2,083.12
OK CHOCTAW CITY $1,127.50
OK CHOUTEAU TOWN $5,525.00
OK CLAREMORE CITY $4,550.00
OK CLEVELAND COUNTY $3,425.18
OK CLINTON CITY $3,429.00
OK COLLINSVILLE CITY $1,080.00
OK CUSHING CITY $8,442.00
OK DURANT CITY $12,325.00
OK EL RENO CITY $2,536.88
OK GUTHRIE CITY $8,073.38
OK INOLA TOWN $2,538.00
OK MOORE CITY $9,240.00
OK MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION $478.42
OK MUSKOGEE CITY $3,034.50
OK MUSTANG CITY $7,322.00
OK NOBLE CITY $2,824.50
OK OKLAHOMA $15,513.41
OK OKMULGEE CITY $5,849.91
OK OWASSO CITY $6,800.00
OK PAYNE COUNTY $9,773.52
OK PRYOR CREEK CITY $4,250.00
OK ROGERS COUNTY $5,525.00
OK SAND SPRINGS CITY $7,012.50
OK SHAWNEE CITY $6,075.00
OK STILLWATER CITY $37,825.00
OK STROUD CITY $398.50
OK TAHLEQUAH CITY $10,114.00
OK TUTTLE CITY $2,030.63
OK WOODWARD CITY $1,725.00
Totals for OK(35 Jurisdictions): $223,101.95
OR ALBANY CITY $6,720.00
OR ASHLAND CITY $7,748.50
OR ASTORIA CITY $4,800.00
OR AUMSVILLE CITY $841.50
OR BAKER COUNTY $2,725.50
OR BEAVERTON CITY $21,000.00
OR BENTON COUNTY $19,550.00
OR BROOKINGS CITY $4,192.00
OR BURNS CITY $1,290.00
OR CANBY CITY $3,360.00
OR CANNON BEACH CITY $2,361.76
OR CARLTON CITY $1,650.00
OR COLUMBIA COUNTY $14,050.00
OR COOS BAY CITY $1,290.00
OR CORVALLIS CITY $16,830.00
OR DALLAS CITY $6,111.00
OR FLORENCE CITY $3,400.00
OR FOREST GROVE CITY $2,312.50

OR GLADSTONE CITY $3,640.00
OR HARNEY COUNTY $2,300.00
OR HERMISTON CITY $6,833.75
OR HOOD RIVER CITY $1,511.00
OR HUBBARD CITY $1,160.00
OR JOSEPHINE COUNTY $7,670.00
OR KEIZER CITY $6,735.00
OR KLAMATH COUNTY $9,675.00
OR KLAMATH FALLS CITY $6,000.00
OR LA GRANDE CITY $1,710.00
OR LAKE OSWEGO CITY $6,450.00
OR LEBANON CITY $2,940.00
OR LINCOLN CITY $5,805.00
OR LINCOLN COUNTY $16,200.00
OR MCMINNVILLE CITY $6,796.00
OR MILTON FREEWATER CITY $3,750.00
OR MILWAUKIE CITY $2,350.00
OR MOLALLA CITY $5,805.00
OR MONMOUTH TOWN $3,225.00
OR NYSSA CITY $2,220.00
OR OREGON CITY $5,950.00
OR POLK COUNTY $6,723.00
OR PRINEVILLE CITY $4,240.00
OR REDMOND CITY $7,140.00
OR REEDSPORT CITY $3,084.50
OR ROSEBURG CITY $3,810.00
OR SILVERTON CITY $3,075.00
OR SPRINGFIELD CITY $10,760.84
OR ST HELENS CITY $6,860.00
OR STAYTON CITY $2,754.00
OR SUTHERLIN CITY $1,425.00
OR TILLAMOOK CITY $747.00
OR TILLAMOOK COUNTY $10,815.00
OR TOLEDO CITY $2,172.00
OR TUALATIN CITY $7,265.50
OR UNION COUNTY $17,415.00
OR WARRENTON CITY $2,550.00
OR WASCO COUNTY $10,137.50
OR WINSTON CITY $790.00
OR WOODBURN CITY $1,230.00
Totals for OR(58 Jurisdictions): $331,952.85
PA ABINGTON TOWNSHIP $11,430.00
PA ADAMS TOWNSHIP $1,641.00
PA ALBURTIS BOROUGH $2,606.58
PA ALLEGHENY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY $2,250.00
PA ALLEGHENY TOWNSHIP $5,524.97
PA ALTOONA CITY $13,446.00
PA AMITY TOWNSHIP $2,033.63
PA ARCHBALD BOROUGH $8,498.22

PA ARMSTRONG COUNTY $4,154.15
PA ATHENS BOROUGH $1,637.00
PA BALDWIN BOROUGH $8,547.50
PA BALDWIN TOWNSHIP $921.74
PA BEAVER BOROUGH $1,389.00
PA BEDFORD COUNTY $7,500.00
PA BELL ACRES BOROUGH $612.50
PA BELLEVUE BOROUGH $1,837.50
PA BENSALEM TOWNSHIP $15,951.26
PA BERLIN BOROUGH $425.00
PA BETHEL PARK MUNICIPALITY $10,000.00
PA BETHLEHEM CITY $17,425.00
PA BRADFORD CITY $700.00
PA BRECKNOCK TOWNSHIP $1,973.18
PA BRIAR CREEK TOWNSHIP $2,622.00
PA BRIDGEVILLE BOROUGH $4,249.50
PA BRISTOL TOWNSHIP $8,756.93
PA BROCKWAY BOROUGH $1,185.00
PA BROOKHAVEN BOROUGH $2,291.63
PA BROOKVILLE BOROUGH $854.79
PA BUCKINGHAM TOWNSHIP $492.10
PA BUFFALO TOWNSHIP $2,125.00
PA BUTLER CITY $1,275.00
PA CALN TOWNSHIP $4,259.97
PA CARBON COUNTY $8,500.00
PA CARLISLE BOROUGH $4,113.00
PA CARNEGIE BOROUGH $3,600.00
PA CARROLL TOWNSHIP $1,614.00
PA CASTLE SHANNON BOROUGH $5,899.30
PA CATASAUQUA BOROUGH $1,321.22
PA CENTRAL BUCKS REGIONAL POLICE DEPT $3,747.50
PA CHAMBERSBURG BOROUGH $12,676.73
PA CHARLEROI BOROUGH $2,800.00
PA CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP $10,323.27
PA CHESTER CITY $7,364.63
PA CHRISTIANA BOROUGH $1,537.50
PA CLARION COUNTY $1,725.00
PA CLARKS SUMMIT BOROUGH $742.50
PA CLAY TOWNSHIP $11,150.02
PA CLEARFIELD COUNTY $1,000.00
PA COAL TOWNSHIP $2,037.50
PA COLLEGEVILLE BOROUGH $2,084.52
PA CONEWAGO TOWNSHIP $1,069.95
PA CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP $7,410.50
PA CUMRU TOWNSHIP $1,275.00
PA DALLAS TOWNSHIP $5,769.50
PA DANVILLE BOROUGH $2,550.00
PA DARBY BOROUGH $3,945.65
PA DARBY TOWNSHIP $7,768.15

PA DERRY TOWNSHIP $5,841.50
PA DOUGLASS TOWNSHIP $650.00
PA DOVER TOWNSHIP $6,611.25
PA DOWNINGTOWN BOROUGH $4,415.84
PA DOYLESTOWN TOWNSHIP $2,998.14
PA DUBLIN BOROUGH $985.00
PA EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP $4,312.50
PA EAST PENNSBORO TOWNSHIP $8,088.74
PA EAST STROUDSBURG AREA SCH DIST $4,400.00
PA EAST WHITELAND TOWNSHIP $4,046.36
PA EASTON CITY $7,280.28
PA EDINBORO BOROUGH $2,918.00
PA ELIZABETH BOROUGH $3,587.50
PA ELIZABETHTOWN BOROUGH $1,032.50
PA ELK COUNTY $2,025.98
PA ELLWOOD CITY BOROUGH $3,777.50
PA EMMAUS BOROUGH $2,762.98
PA EPHRATA BOROUGH $7,323.00
PA ERIE CITY $32,375.00
PA EXETER TOWNSHIP $2,592.48
PA FAIRVIEW TOWNSHIP $3,727.23
PA FARRELL CITY $1,700.00
PA FERGUSON TOWNSHIP $1,980.00
PA FLEETWOOD BOROUGH $2,533.80
PA GLENOLDEN BOROUGH $1,223.86
PA GREENSBURG CITY $2,427.00
PA GREENVILLE BOROUGH $5,902.00
PA GROVE CITY BOROUGH $1,968.00
PA HANOVER BOROUGH $5,040.00
PA HARRISON TOWNSHIP $3,412.46
PA HARRISVILLE BOROUGH $1,275.00
PA HATBORO BOROUGH $1,665.00
PA HATFIELD TOWNSHIP $6,540.00
PA HAVERFORD TOWNSHIP $9,896.00
PA HAZLETON CITY $3,200.00
PA HELLERTOWN BOROUGH $1,243.87
PA HEMLOCK TOWNSHIP $1,223.86
PA HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP $1,761.62
PA HERMITAGE CITY $5,565.00
PA HICKORY TOWNSHIP $3,397.50
PA HIGHSPIRE BOROUGH $600.00
PA HILLTOWN TOWNSHIP $1,101.46
PA HOMESTEAD BOROUGH $6,237.50
PA HONEY BROOK BOROUGH $1,963.30
PA HULMEVILLE BOROUGH $567.34
PA HARRISBURG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT $2,095.00
PA INDIANA COUNTY $976.44
PA IRWIN BOROUGH $1,900.00
PA JERMYN BOROUGH $890.00

PA KENNETT SQUARE BOROUGH $4,149.53
PA KNOX BOROUGH $758.83
PA KENNETT TOWNSHIP $945.32
PA LAKE CITY BOROUGH $1,199.00
PA LANCASTER CITY $19,521.00
PA LANSDOWNE BOROUGH $3,627.45
PA LATROBE BOROUGH $5,592.00
PA LAWRENCE COUNTY $17,851.37
PA LAWRENCE PARK TOWNSHIP $3,400.00
PA LEBANON CITY $1,950.00
PA LEECHBURG BOROUGH $1,577.50
PA LEET TOWNSHIP $1,950.00
PA LEHIGH TOWNSHIP $1,095.00
PA LEWISTOWN BOROUGH $2,054.25
PA LIBERTY TOWNSHIP $538.13
PA LIMERICK TOWNSHIP $5,432.00
PA LINCOLN BOROUGH $3,000.00
PA LINESVILLE BOROUGH $179.98
PA LOCUST TOWNSHIP $1,107.00
PA LOGAN TOWNSHIP $1,379.97
PA LOWER ALLEN TOWNSHIP $1,363.40
PA LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP $2,004.98
PA LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP $14,179.00
PA LOWER MORELAND TOWNSHIP $2,750.00
PA LOWER PAXTON TOWNSHIP $6,143.50
PA LOWER POTTSGROVE TOWNSHIP $1,700.00
PA LOWER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP $2,454.13
PA LOWER SALFORD TOWNSHIP $1,462.48
PA LOWER SAUCON TOWNSHIP $2,859.75
PA LYCOMING REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT $6,599.90
PA MAHANOY TOWNSHIP $2,100.00
PA MAIDEN CREEK TOWNSHIP $1,449.48
PA MALVERN BOROUGH $4,477.50
PA MANHEIM TOWNSHIP $6,696.90
PA MANOR TOWNSHIP (LANCASTER) $5,000.00
PA MANOR TOWNSHIP (MCGRANN) $2,170.00
PA MANSFIELD BOROUGH $2,974.98
PA MARCUS HOOK BOROUGH $1,600.00
PA MARLBOROUGH TOWNSHIP $892.00
PA MARPLE TOWNSHIP $2,555.35
PA MCDONALD BOROUGH $1,267.50
PA MCKEES ROCKS BOROUGH $2,450.00
PA MEADVILLE CITY $1,761.62
PA MIDDLEBURG BOROUGH $1,576.50
PA MIDDLETOWN BOROUGH $3,106.98
PA MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP $3,474.98
PA MIFFLIN COUNTY $3,176.00
PA MIFFLIN COUNTY REGIONAL DISTRICT $721.50
PA MIFFLINBURG BOROUGH $3,000.00

PA MILFORD BOROUGH $4,350.00
PA MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH $594.00
PA MONESSEN CITY $3,630.00
PA MONONGAHELA CITY $4,051.98
PA MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP $1,142.96
PA MOON TOWNSHIP $12,362.00
PA MOORE TOWNSHIP $3,566.50
PA MOSCOW BOROUGH $565.90
PA MOUNT JOY BOROUGH $2,756.00
PA MOUNT OLIVER BOROUGH $1,312.50
PA MUHLENBERG TOWNSHIP $5,711.20
PA MUNHALL BOROUGH $3,648.00
PA NETHER PROVIDENCE TOWNSHIP $1,466.16
PA NEW CUMBERLAND BOROUGH $2,742.90
PA NEW HOPE BOROUGH $2,784.00
PA NEWTOWN TOWNSHIP $7,117.32
PA NORRISTOWN BOROUGH $13,761.77
PA NORTH COVENTRY TOWNSHIP $2,190.52
PA NORTH EAST BOROUGH $2,859.00
PA NORTH LONDONDERRY TOWNSHIP $2,220.00
PA NORTH WALES BOROUGH $1,207.67
PA NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP $3,354.69
PA NORTHERN CAMBRIA BOROUGH $1,275.00
PA NORTHERN LEHIGH SCHOOL POLICE DISTRICT $850.00
PA NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY $3,750.00
PA NEW TOWN BOROUGH $778.00
PA NORTH STRABANE TOWNSHIP $7,225.00
PA NORTHWEST REGIONAL POLICE $2,195.00
PA OHIO TOWNSHIP $6,050.00
PA PALMER TOWNSHIP $5,518.50
PA PATTERSON TOWNSHIP $2,975.00
PA PATTON TOWNSHIP $2,954.94
PA PENBROOK BOROUGH $2,549.98
PA PENN TOWNSHIP $2,357.08
PA PENNDEL BOROUGH $1,513.50
PA PEQUEA TOWNSHIP $2,125.00
PA PHOENIXVILLE BOROUGH $5,994.00
PA PIKE COUNTY $1,956.60
PA PITTSTON CITY $499.69
PA PLAINFIELD TOWNSHIP $2,101.62
PA PLEASANT HILLS BOROUGH $8,490.00
PA PLUMSTEAD TOWNSHIP $3,657.50
PA PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP $4,970.66
PA POINT TOWNSHIP $2,312.92
PA POTTSTOWN BOROUGH $6,936.00
PA POCONO MOUNTAIN REGIONAL POLICE COMMISSION $3,727.50 PA QUAKERTOWN BOROUGH $2,925.00
PA RACCOON TOWNSHIP $1,700.00
PA RICE TOWNSHIP $1,275.00

PA ROBESON TOWNSHIP $1,336.00
PA ROCHESTER BOROUGH $1,584.00
PA ROCHESTER TOWNSHIP $4,200.00
PA RICHLAND TOWNSHIP $2,463.50
PA SALISBURY TOWNSHIP $5,180.00
PA SANDY TOWNSHIP $6,375.00
PA SCHUYLKILL HAVEN BOROUGH $3,497.83
PA SCHUYLKILL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS $1,109.73
PA SCRANTON CITY $59,500.00
PA SELLERSVILLE BOROUGH $2,240.00
PA SEWICKLEY BOROUGH $5,973.00
PA SHARPSVILLE BOROUGH $3,996.00
PA SHIPPENSBUGH BOROUGH $442.80
PA SILVER SPRING TOWNSHIP $7,000.00
PA SLATINGTON BOROUGH $1,873.50
PA SOLEBURY TOWNSHIP $2,851.07
PA SOMERSET COUNTY $3,200.00
PA SOUTH CENTRE TOWNSHIP $4,434.50
PA SOUTH COATESVILLE BOROUGH $4,217.50
PA SOUTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP $9,775.00
PA SOUTH HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP $3,610.98
PA SOUTH PARK TOWNSHIP $6,728.00
PA SOUTH STRABANE TOWNSHIP $4,257.00
PA SOUTH WHITEHALL TOWNSHIP $12,562.97
PA SOUTH WILLIAMSPORT BOROUGH $2,599.16
PA SPRING TOWNSHIP (BELLEFONTE) $1,325.00
PA SPRING TOWNSHIP (READING) $9,349.95
PA SPRINGDALE BOROUGH $2,505.00
PA SPRINGDALE TOWNSHIP $1,305.00
PA SPRINGETTSBURY TOWNSHIP $2,117.00
PA SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP (SPRINGFIELD) $3,159.00
PA SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP (WYNDMOOR) $4,765.99
PA STATE COLLEGE BOROUGH $3,600.00
PA STEELTON BOROUGH $2,467.47
PA STRASBURG BOROUGH $1,840.10
PA SUNBURY CITY $3,025.00
PA SUSQUEHANNA TOWNSHIP $2,991.99
PA SWATARA TOWNSHIP $7,039.92
PA SWISSVALE BOROUGH $2,075.00
PA SWOYERSVILLE BOROUGH $2,595.00
PA TOWAMENCIN TOWNSHIP $3,037.13
PA TOWANDA BOROUGH $3,405.00
PA TREDYFFRIN TOWNSHIP $5,985.15
PA TULLYTOWN BOROUGH $3,100.50
PA UNION CITY BOROUGH $850.00
PA UNION TOWNSHIP $2,800.00
PA UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP $8,075.00
PA UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP $4,894.73
PA UPPER DUBLIN TOWNSHIP $3,300.00

PA UPPER GWYNEDD TOWNSHIP $3,750.00
PA UPPER MACUNGIE TOWNSHIP $3,357.00
PA UPPER MERION TOWNSHIP $9,840.00
PA UPPER MORELAND TOWNSHIP $10,110.00
PA UPPER POTTSGROVE TOWNSHIP $1,314.00
PA UPPER SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP $3,152.18
PA UPPER ST CLAIR TOWNSHIP $3,424.40
PA UPPER PERK POLICE DISTRICT $1,472.74
PA VALLEY TOWNSHIP $930.59
PA WARMINSTER TOWNSHIP $5,700.00
PA WARREN CITY $2,090.00
PA WARRINGTON TOWNSHIP $5,120.50
PA WARWICK TOWNSHIP $2,673.98
PA WASHINGTON CITY $1,800.00
PA WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP (APOLLO) $2,274.00
PA WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP (WAYNESBORO) $895.50
PA WAYMART BOROUGH $1,700.00
PA WEATHERLY BOROUGH $2,124.00
PA WEST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP $1,650.00
PA WEST CALN TOWNSHIP $407.50
PA WEST CHESTER BOROUGH $5,345.00
PA WEST DEER TOWNSHIP $1,892.00
PA WEST EARL TOWNSHIP $1,986.00
PA WEST HAZLETON BOROUGH $2,595.00
PA WEST LAMPETER TOWNSHIP $2,552.50
PA WEST MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP $7,048.20
PA WEST MANHEIM TOWNSHIP $1,462.17
PA WEST NORRITON TOWNSHIP $3,501.71
PA WEST PIKE RUN TOWNSHIP $425.00
PA WEST POTTSGROVE TOWNSHIP $907.08
PA WEST SADSBURY TOWNSHIP $2,400.00
PA WEST SHORE REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT $3,693.00
PA WEST VINCENT TOWNSHIP $915.30
PA WEST WHITELAND TOWNSHIP $1,575.00
PA WHITE OAK BOROUGH $3,097.50
PA WHITEHALL BOROUGH $5,525.00
PA WHITEMARSH TOWNSHIP $5,092.24
PA WHITPAIN TOWNSHIP $4,208.40
PA WILKES BARRE CITY $10,732.50
PA WILKES BARRE TOWNSHIP $4,379.48
PA WILKINS TOWNSHIP $5,081.50
PA WILKINSBURG BOROUGH $4,947.04
PA WILLIAMSPORT CITY $5,850.00
PA WINDBER BOROUGH $7,372.50
PA WYOMISSING BOROUGH $3,375.00
PA YORK CITY $7,972.73
PA YORK COUNTY REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT $1,296.49
Totals for PA(300 Jurisdictions): $1,207,645.90
PR MUNICIPIO DE TOA ALTA $10,500.00

Totals for PR(1 Jurisdictions): $10,500.00
RI BURRILLVILLE TOWN $3,415.00
RI CENTRAL FALLS CITY $6,942.00
RI COVENTRY TOWN $8,787.50
RI CUMBERLAND TOWN $12,783.90
RI EAST PROVIDENCE CITY $11,538.63
RI GLOCESTER TOWN $2,982.50
RI JAMESTOWN TOWN $2,196.00
RI LITTLE COMPTON TOWN $959.00
RI MIDDLETOWN TOWN $9,424.00
RI NARRAGANSETT TOWN $3,132.50
RI NEWPORT CITY $4,250.00
RI NORTH KINGSTOWN TOWN $17,220.00
RI NORTH PROVIDENCE TOWN $6,000.00
RI PAWTUCKET CITY $4,415.00
RI PORTSMOUTH TOWN $3,325.00
RI RHODE ISLAND AIRPORT CORPORATION $350.00
RI SOUTH KINGSTOWN TOWN $11,900.00
RI SMITHFIELD $7,205.00
RI WARWICK CITY $21,662.94
RI WEST GREENWICH TOWN $5,337.50
RI WEST WARWICK TOWN $5,187.00
RI WOONSOCKET CITY $6,375.00
Totals for RI(22 Jurisdictions): $155,388.47
SC AIKEN CITY $9,199.48
SC BARNWELL CITY $1,620.00
SC BATESBURG-LEESVILLE TOWN $5,610.46
SC BEAUFORT COUNTY $1,058.27
SC CHESTER COUNTY $2,751.30
SC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY $3,183.15
SC CLARENDON COUNTY $2,478.60
SC CLEMSON CITY $2,030.80
SC CONWAY $2,312.50
SC DORCHESTER COUNTY $4,656.89
SC GEORGETOWN CITY $4,360.23
SC GOOSE CREEK CITY $16,795.00
SC GREENVILLE CITY $26,420.55
SC GREENWOOD COUNTY $10,375.00
SC GREER CITY $9,416.96
SC HANAHAN CITY $4,077.00
SC HARDEEVILLE CITY $1,537.72
SC HARTSVILLE CITY $3,293.50
SC HORRY COUNTY $4,154.42
SC LANCASTER CITY $8,150.00
SC LAURENS COUNTY $8,798.75
SC LORIS CITY $2,097.69
SC MOUNT PLEASANT TOWN $21,677.99
SC MYRTLE BEACH CITY $12,011.80
SC NEWBERRY COUNTY $2,883.27

SC NORTH AUGUSTA CITY $2,540.00
SC NORTH CHARLESTON CITY $1,842.44
SC ORANGEBURG CITY $11,270.00
SC OCONEE COUNTY $13,780.00
SC PICKENS COUNTY $915.31
SC PORT ROYAL TOWN $1,720.81
SC RICHLAND COUNTY $3,576.74
SC ROCK HILL CITY $19,643.52
SC SANTEE TOWN $3,398.50
SC SIMPSONVILLE CITY $5,994.00
SC SOUTH CAROLINA $58,371.69
SC SPRINGDALE TOWN $756.49
SC SULLIVAN'S ISLAND TOWN $4,600.00
SC SUMMERVILLE TOWN $19,738.83
SC SUMTER CITY $14,875.00
SC SURF SIDE BEACH $4,712.40
SC TEGA CAY CITY $2,124.99
SC TRAVELERS REST CITY $3,888.73
SC WEST COLUMBIA CITY $4,068.68
SC WILLIAMSTON TOWN $6,832.14
Totals for SC(45 Jurisdictions): $355,601.60
SD ABERDEEN CITY $2,851.24
SD BROOKINGS CITY $8,940.00
SD CAMPBELL COUNTY $425.00
SD CHARLES MIX COUNTY $552.25
SD DAVISON COUNTY $1,514.74
SD FALL RIVER COUNTY $2,798.55
SD HOT SPRINGS CITY $2,105.22
SD HURON CITY $4,932.00
SD LINCOLN COUNTY $2,750.00
SD MADISON CITY $4,530.00
SD PHILIP CITY $616.45
SD PIERRE CITY $1,302.84
SD RAPID CITY $11,963.25
SD SISSETON CITY $1,541.54
SD SPINK COUNTY $2,175.00
SD UNION COUNTY $2,133.19
SD VERMILLION CITY $3,085.00
SD YANKTON CITY $7,245.00
Totals for SD(18 Jurisdictions): $61,461.27
TN ALCOA CITY $7,873.97
TN ALGOOD CITY $1,766.42
TN ANDERSON COUNTY $6,960.00
TN ATHENS CITY $4,199.45
TN BAXTER TOWN $4,000.00
TN BRISTOL CITY $10,625.00
TN BROWNSVILLE CITY $2,520.00
TN BARTLETT $6,875.00
TN CAMPBELL COUNTY $7,920.63

TN CARROLL COUNTY $9,940.00
TN COCKE COUNTY $6,375.00
TN COLLIERVILLE TOWN $3,000.00
TN COLUMBIA CITY $9,250.00
TN CROSSVILLE CITY $6,375.00
TN CHAPEL HILL $2,651.50
TN DICKSON CITY $5,600.00
TN DICKSON COUNTY $2,925.00
TN DYER COUNTY $9,485.10
TN DYERSBURG CITY $4,200.00
TN EAST RIDGE CITY $7,152.50
TN ELIZABETHTON CITY $8,445.50
TN FAIRVIEW CITY $4,100.92
TN FRANKLIN CITY $17,500.00
TN GALLATIN CITY $9,350.00
TN GOODLETTSVILLE CITY $2,400.00
TN GORDONSVILLE CITY $3,400.00
TN GREENE COUNTY $3,500.00
TN GREENEVILLE TOWN $5,495.00
TN GREENFIELD TOWN $511.50
TN HAMBLEN COUNTY $25,042.50
TN HAMILTON COUNTY $2,206.99
TN HARRIMAN CITY $3,204.80
TN HAWKINS COUNTY $14,835.00
TN HENDERSONVILLE CITY $14,699.76
TN HICKMAN COUNTY $5,785.00
TN HOHENWALD CITY $850.00
TN JACKSON CITY $6,600.00
TN JEFFERSON COUNTY $16,649.82
TN JOHNSON CITY $15,000.00
TN JONESBOROUGH TOWN $4,249.95
TN KENTON TOWN $1,320.00
TN KINGSPORT CITY $14,250.00
TN KNOX COUNTY $5,825.88
TN KNOXVILLE CITY $3,865.79
TN LA FOLLETTE CITY $2,129.48
TN LAKE CITY $1,562.50
TN LAUDERDALE COUNTY $12,750.00
TN LAVERGNE CITY $3,282.85
TN LEBANON CITY $25,187.50
TN LENOIR CITY $1,860.00
TN LEWISBURG CITY $2,625.00
TN LEXINGTON CITY $2,700.00
TN MACON COUNTY $9,945.00
TN MADISON COUNTY $19,608.00
TN MANCHESTER CITY $7,225.00
TN MARSHALL COUNTY $7,571.25
TN MARYVILLE CITY $7,364.88
TN MORRISTOWN CITY $16,690.00

TN MOUNT PLEASANT CITY $1,644.98
TN MOUNTAIN CITY TOWN $4,000.00
TN MT JULIET CITY $11,532.09
TN OAK RIDGE CITY $4,321.38
TN OLIVER SPRINGS TOWN $1,245.00
TN OVERTON COUNTY $5,165.88
TN PARIS CITY $3,315.16
TN PIGEON FORGE CITY $5,225.00
TN PULASKI CITY $5,100.00
TN RED BANK CITY $6,955.00
TN RHEA COUNTY $36,075.00
TN ROBERTSON COUNTY $7,875.00
TN ROANE COUNTY GOVERNMENT $4,603.05
TN SEVIER COUNTY $4,068.98
TN SEVIERVILLE CITY $8,500.00
TN SHELBYVILLE CITY $8,075.00
TN SMYRNA TOWN $6,840.00
TN SOMERVILLE TOWN $5,375.25
TN SPRING HILL TOWN $6,760.00
TN STEWART COUNTY $2,373.00
TN SULLIVAN COUNTY $2,456.17
TN TENNESSEE $1,280.71
TN TIPTON COUNTY $850.00
TN TRENTON CITY $2,300.00
TN TULLAHOMA CITY $5,100.00
TN UNION CITY $15,300.00
TN WASHINGTON COUNTY $2,507.43
TN WHITE BLUFF TOWN $1,922.50
TN WHITE HOUSE CITY $2,493.75
TN WINCHESTER CITY $2,400.00
Totals for TN(88 Jurisdictions): $604,944.77
TX ADDISON TOWN $17,282.85
TX ALAMO HEIGHTS CITY $1,342.50
TX ALICE CITY $3,615.50
TX ALLEN CITY $1,286.46
TX ALVIN CITY $6,375.00
TX ALVIN IND SCH DIST 901 $9,125.68
TX ANNA CITY $1,900.00
TX ARGYLE CITY $3,890.09
TX ATHENS CITY $7,784.50
TX AZLE CITY $2,790.94
TX BALCH SPRINGS CITY $4,675.00
TX BASTROP COUNTY $654.03
TX BAY CITY $8,352.00
TX BAYTOWN CITY $20,257.50
TX BEDFORD TOWN $7,600.00
TX BELLAIRE CITY $8,256.54
TX BELLMEAD CITY $715.71
TX BELTON CITY $4,675.00

TX BENBROOK CITY $3,210.32
TX BEVERLY HILLS CITY $1,645.37
TX BIG SPRING CITY $5,505.60
TX BORGER CITY $6,653.00
TX BRENHAM CITY $3,714.70
TX BRISCOE COUNTY $3,360.00
TX BROWN CO WID 1 $1,048.50
TX BROWN COUNTY $4,400.00
TX BURKBURNETT CITY $7,887.50
TX BURNET COUNTY $10,625.00
TX BRIDGE CITY $4,350.84
TX CALVERT CITY $1,212.50
TX CAMERON COUNTY $1,143.84
TX CANYON CITY $4,870.50
TX CEDAR HILL CITY $7,725.68
TX CIBOLO CITY $2,925.00
TX CLAY COUNTY $3,034.26
TX CLEBURNE CITY $7,297.92
TX COLLEYVILLE CITY $7,439.92
TX COLLIN COUNTY $14,484.06
TX COMAL COUNTY $3,900.91
TX CONROE CITY $17,887.78
TX CONROE IND SCH DIST 902 $11,497.10
TX COPPELL CITY $5,047.50
TX COPPERAS COVE CITY $6,000.00
TX CORSICANA CITY $3,037.50
TX CRANE COUNTY $1,719.82
TX CITY OF BULVERDE $2,905.00
TX CITY OF RED OAK $2,700.00
TX DECATUR CITY $2,394.74
TX DEER PARK CITY $13,200.00
TX DENTON CITY $4,195.65
TX DENVER CITY $1,275.00
TX DESOTO CITY $13,440.00
TX DICKINSON CITY $4,900.00
TX DONNA CITY $7,750.00
TX DUMAS CITY $2,771.88
TX DUNCANVILLE CITY $7,848.50
TX DALLAS-FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD $2,287.00 TX EARLY CITY $337.50
TX EL PASO COUNTY $2,634.15
TX ERATH COUNTY $3,059.25
TX EULESS CITY $10,800.00
TX FAIR OAKS RANCH CITY $3,075.00
TX FARMERS BRANCH CITY $8,279.91
TX FAYETTE COUNTY $2,125.00
TX FLOWER MOUND CITY $19,559.38
TX FOREST HILL CITY $5,698.64
TX FORNEY CITY $9,128.03

TX FORT BEND COUNTY $2,702.97
TX FORT STOCKTON CITY $5,855.64
TX FORT WORTH CITY $478.42
TX FREDERICKSBURG CITY $6,525.00
TX FREESTONE COUNTY $4,194.00
TX FRIENDSWOOD CITY $11,600.00
TX FULSHEAR CITY $5,165.00
TX GAINESVILLE CITY $4,949.94
TX GALVESTON CITY $69,300.00
TX GIDDINGS CITY $4,627.63
TX GILLESPIE COUNTY $2,930.50
TX GILMER CITY $5,580.00
TX GLADEWATER CITY $4,599.50
TX GRAHAM CITY $1,243.51
TX GRAND PRAIRIE CITY $640.03
TX GRAPEVINE CITY $11,159.88
TX GREENVILLE CITY $11,657.72
TX GUN BARREL CITY $5,755.00
TX HALLETTSVILLE CITY $1,070.00
TX HARDIN COUNTY $17,832.85
TX HARKER HEIGHTS CITY $4,862.50
TX HARLINGEN CITY $19,143.50
TX HARRIS COUNTY $29,821.02
TX HARRISON COUNTY $9,562.50
TX HAYS COUNTY $979.07
TX HEARNE CITY $3,025.00
TX HEATH CITY $2,462.50
TX HENDERSON CITY $9,248.00
TX HENDERSON COUNTY $30,647.50
TX HEREFORD CITY $1,017.00
TX HEWITT CITY $3,625.72
TX HICKORY CREEK TOWN $4,017.00
TX HIGHLAND PARK CITY $13,098.50
TX HILL COUNTY $11,745.42
TX HONDO CITY $387.50
TX HOOD COUNTY $8,597.50
TX HOUSTON CITY $29,426.49
TX HUGHES SPRINGS TOWN $2,125.00
TX HUNT COUNTY $764.10
TX HUNTSVILLE CITY $12,387.50
TX HURST CITY $13,434.30
TX HUTCHINS CITY $4,835.00
TX HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL $1,367.46
TX INGLESIDE CITY $4,454.50
TX IOWA PARK CITY $1,870.80
TX JACINTO CITY $1,390.00
TX JACK COUNTY $1,527.00
TX JACKSBORO CITY $1,792.06
TX JACKSON COUNTY $1,943.50

TX JASPER CITY $943.65
TX JIM WELLS COUNTY $15,250.00
TX JONES COUNTY $2,493.35
TX JONESTOWN CITY $1,656.00
TX JOSHUA CITY $7,225.00
TX KAUFMAN CITY $4,250.00
TX KAUFMAN ISD POLICE DEPT $1,911.70
TX KELLER CITY $11,070.00
TX KERRVILLE CITY $5,525.00
TX KILGORE CITY $6,005.84
TX KINGSVILLE CITY $14,265.00
TX LA PORTE CITY $7,350.00
TX LAGO VISTA CITY $8,253.05
TX LAKE JACKSON CITY $7,999.00
TX LAKE WORTH CITY $14,562.50
TX LAMPASAS CITY $2,375.00
TX LAREDO CITY $5,353.73
TX LAREDO IND SCH DIST 901 $18,966.59
TX LEANDER CITY $4,675.00
TX LEE COUNTY $3,678.50
TX LEON VALLEY CITY $4,700.00
TX LIBERTY HILL CITY $4,874.00
TX LITTLE ELM TOWN $5,571.00
TX LIVE OAK CITY $3,180.00
TX LLANO CITY $764.44
TX LOCKHART CITY $4,327.38
TX LONGVIEW CITY $25,354.50
TX LORENA CITY $1,083.33
TX LOS FRESNOS CITY $2,852.50
TX LUFKIN CITY $3,184.65
TX MABANK TOWN $3,400.00
TX MANOR CITY $7,029.91
TX MANSFIELD CITY $32,376.64
TX MARSHALL CITY $3,751.11
TX MCLENNAN COUNTY $1,785.77
TX MEADOWS CITY $2,975.00
TX MEDINA COUNTY $10,354.40
TX MINERAL WELLS CITY $7,512.89
TX MISSION CITY $11,286.00
TX MONAHANS CITY $1,295.68
TX MONT BELVIEU TOWN $4,675.00
TX MONTAGUE COUNTY $2,125.00
TX MONTGOMERY CITY $6,140.00
TX MORGANS POINT RESORT CITY $4,306.50
TX MOUNT PLEASANT CITY $6,030.00
TX MULESHOE CITY $1,150.00
TX MUSTANG RIDGE CITY $1,132.02
TX NACOGDOCHES CITY $8,408.18
TX NACOGDOCHES COUNTY $3,925.63

TX NAVARRO COUNTY $7,150.00
TX NAVASOTA CITY $3,381.00
TX NEDERLAND CITY $2,685.00
TX NEW BRAUNFELS CITY $22,020.00
TX NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY $16,546.23
TX NUECES COUNTY $598.58
TX OAK POINT TOWN $7,790.00
TX ODESSA CITY $759.40
TX ORANGE CITY $8,803.72
TX ORANGE COUNTY $9,759.50
TX OVILLA CITY $2,288.20
TX PALMER TOWN $751.50
TX PALO PINTO COUNTY $3,786.48
TX PASADENA CITY $2,833.49
TX PENITAS CITY $1,997.50
TX PETERSBURG CITY $707.00
TX PHARR CITY $19,380.00
TX PINEHURST CITY $3,135.47
TX PLAINVIEW CITY $3,907.92
TX PORT ARTHUR CITY $13,734.20
TX PORT LAVACA CITY $6,444.65
TX PORT NECHES CITY $2,125.00
TX POTTER COUNTY $1,052.01
TX PRIMERA TOWN $3,818.54
TX QUITMAN CITY $1,745.67
TX RICHARDSON CITY $2,477.50
TX RICHLAND HILLS CITY $3,251.12
TX RICHMOND CITY $3,000.00
TX RIVER OAKS CITY $2,796.50
TX ROANOKE CITY $10,423.61
TX ROBINSON CITY $5,728.42
TX ROBSTOWN CITY $2,850.00
TX ROCKDALE CITY $2,670.00
TX ROCKWALL COUNTY $741.50
TX ROSENBERG CITY $6,475.00
TX ROUND ROCK CITY $2,636.52
TX ROWLETT CITY $16,573.07
TX RUSK CITY $6,795.00
TX SACHSE CITY $3,863.83
TX SAN ANGELO CITY $5,093.92
TX SAN BENITO CITY $3,701.86
TX SAN MARCOS CITY $47,750.00
TX SEALY CITY $6,037.25
TX SEGUIN CITY $16,910.54
TX SELMA CITY $3,496.50
TX SHAVANO PARK CITY $3,689.40
TX SINTON CITY $1,072.50
TX SOUTHLAKE CITY $4,958.85
TX SOUTHSIDE PLACE CITY $1,437.50

TX STARR COUNTY $9,300.00
TX SUGAR LAND CITY $2,591.43
TX SULPHUR SPRINGS CITY $1,205.00
TX SWEETWATER CITY $2,428.30
TX SWISHER COUNTY $4,230.00
TX SULLIVAN CITY $4,010.00
TX TAYLOR CITY $4,220.00
TX TEMPLE CITY $22,542.00
TX TERRY COUNTY $2,917.39
TX TEXARKANA CITY $4,425.00
TX TEXAS $2,547.46
TX THE COLONY CITY $25,574.73
TX TROY CITY $1,274.99
TX TULIA CITY $847.50
TX UNITED IND SCH DIST 903 $759.35
TX UVALDE CITY $4,650.75
TX VAL VERDE COUNTY $2,537.50
TX VAN ALSTYNE TOWN $2,750.00
TX VENUS TOWN $5,669.20
TX VICTORIA COUNTY $15,228.90
TX VIDOR CITY $6,909.50
TX WACO CITY $378.04
TX WALKER COUNTY $4,100.00
TX WALLER TOWN $2,603.83
TX WASHINGTON COUNTY $1,232.69
TX WATAUGA CITY $11,018.13
TX WEATHERFORD CITY $5,950.00
TX WEBSTER CITY $11,212.50
TX WESLACO CITY $21,835.00
TX WEST ORANGE CITY $2,000.00
TX WESTWORTH VILLAGE $958.98
TX WHARTON CITY $2,487.50
TX WHARTON COUNTY $8,440.15
TX WHITE SETTLEMENT CITY $4,250.00
TX WICHITA FALLS CITY $950.22
TX WILLOW PARK CITY $2,487.50
TX WOODWAY CITY $2,700.00
TX WORTHAM TOWN $3,904.00
TX WYLIE CITY $7,250.75
Totals for TX(253 Jurisdictions): $1,651,364.76
UT BOUNTIFUL CITY $3,990.00
UT CARBON COUNTY $3,915.00
UT CENTERVILLE CITY $6,919.00
UT CLEARFIELD CITY $7,035.00
UT CLINTON CITY $4,515.00
UT COTTONWOOD HEIGHTS $1,087.32
UT DRAPER CITY $3,225.00
UT GRANTSVILLE CITY $7,095.00
UT HARRISVILLE CITY $4,060.72

UT HEBER CITY $4,500.00
UT HERRIMAN CITY $8,250.00
UT HURRICANE CITY $9,037.44
UT IRON COUNTY $12,900.00
UT KAYSVILLE CITY $4,515.00
UT LAYTON CITY $16,221.25
UT LOGAN CITY $11,610.00
UT NAPLES CITY $1,035.00
UT NEPHI CITY $1,629.54
UT NORTH SALT LAKE CITY $3,517.50
UT OGDEN CITY $13,432.50
UT OREM CITY $25,600.00
UT PARK CITY $5,805.00
UT PRICE CITY $3,780.00
UT RIVERTON CITY $15,200.00
UT ROOSEVELT CITY $6,447.00
UT SANDY CITY $22,575.00
UT SANTAQUIN CITY $2,307.51
UT SOUTH OGDEN CITY $9,350.00
UT SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY $5,100.00
UT SPANISH FORK CITY $2,779.33
UT SYRACUSE CITY $7,047.00
UT TOOELE CITY $2,790.00
UT TOOELE COUNTY $13,922.45
UT UINTAH COUNTY $12,997.50
UT WASHINGTON CITY $8,252.31
UT WEST BOUNTIFUL CITY $3,085.48
UT WILLARD CITY $352.56
UT WOODS CROSS CITY $3,495.00
Totals for UT(38 Jurisdictions): $279,376.41
VA AMHERST COUNTY $4,250.00
VA ASHLAND TOWN $3,404.52
VA AUGUSTA COUNTY $5,719.00
VA BEDFORD CITY $1,275.00
VA BEDFORD COUNTY $18,242.00
VA BLACKSTONE TOWN $1,050.05
VA BLUEFIELD TOWN $920.98
VA BOTETOURT COUNTY $5,100.00
VA BUCKINGHAM COUNTY $3,757.50
VA BUENA VISTA CITY $3,550.00
VA CAMPBELL COUNTY $10,625.00
VA CAROLINE COUNTY $6,375.00
VA CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY $13,940.00
VA CHASE CITY TOWN $4,248.00
VA CHILHOWIE TOWN $721.00
VA CHRISTIANSBURG TOWN $5,115.00
VA COLONIAL HEIGHTS CITY $7,140.00
VA COVINGTON CITY $2,975.00
VA CULPEPER COUNTY $13,021.25

VA CUMBERLAND COUNTY $7,725.12
VA DANVILLE CITY $19,515.00
VA DUMFRIES TOWN $4,175.28
VA ELKTON TOWN $1,867.50
VA EXMORE TOWN $1,600.00
VA FAIRFAX CITY $5,768.91
VA FARMVILLE TOWN $9,506.60
VA FAUQUIER COUNTY $9,610.00
VA FLUVANNA COUNTY $3,183.60
VA FRANKLIN COUNTY $3,821.93
VA FREDERICK COUNTY $11,616.75
VA FREDERICKSBURG CITY $12,750.00
VA FRONT ROYAL TOWN $6,462.23
VA GALAX CITY $2,087.50
VA GLOUCESTER COUNTY $7,545.83
VA GORDONSVILLE TOWN $1,098.35
VA GRAYSON COUNTY $2,100.00
VA GREENE COUNTY $3,049.29
VA GREENSVILLE COUNTY $4,107.50
VA HAMPTON ROADS JAIL AUTHORITY $5,100.00
VA HARRISONBURG CITY $10,696.91
VA HENRY COUNTY $31,910.70
VA HERNDON TOWN $4,950.00
VA JAMES CITY COUNTY $12,321.75
VA LEBANON TOWN $4,250.00
VA LEESBURG TOWN $7,936.83
VA LEXINGTON CITY $1,700.00
VA LOUISA COUNTY $10,626.00
VA LYNCHBURG CITY $27,809.00
VA MANASSAS CITY $7,742.50
VA MARION TOWN $3,479.00
VA MARTINSVILLE CITY $21,294.00
VA MIDDLEBURG TOWN $1,950.00
VA MIDDLETOWN TOWN $652.00
VA NEW KENT COUNTY $3,400.00
VA NOTTOWAY COUNTY $3,093.00
VA ORANGE COUNTY $5,445.00
VA PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY $18,200.00
VA POQUOSON CITY $8,875.44
VA PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY $12,933.20
VA PULASKI TOWN $3,521.00
VA PURCELLVILLE TOWN $1,983.75
VA ROANOKE CITY $59,167.50
VA ROANOKE COUNTY $41,557.28
VA ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY $7,104.52
VA ROCKY MOUNT TOWN $1,647.50
VA RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL $7,995.00
VA SALEM CITY $6,671.15
VA SOUTH BOSTON TOWN $5,000.00

VA SOUTH HILL TOWN $1,635.20
VA ST PAUL TOWN $3,193.05
VA SUFFOLK CITY $39,129.52
VA SURRY COUNTY $3,712.50
VA TAZEWELL COUNTY $4,375.00
VA VINTON TOWN $5,100.00
VA WARRENTON TOWN $2,900.00
VA WARSAW TOWN $1,275.00
VA WESTMORELAND COUNTY $3,026.24
VA WILLIAMSBURG CITY $4,875.00
VA WINCHESTER CITY $6,400.00
VA WISE COUNTY $8,062.50
VA WESTERN VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL $13,165.65
VA YORK COUNTY $16,724.50
Totals for VA(82 Jurisdictions): $681,607.88
VT ADDISON COUNTY $1,304.08
VT BARRE CITY $2,570.00
VT BARRE TOWN $1,747.50
VT BELLOWS FALLS VILLAGE $4,550.00
VT BENNINGTON COUNTY $5,140.00
VT BRADFORD TOWN $850.00
VT BRANDON TOWN $1,701.45
VT BRATTLEBORO TOWN $2,826.00
VT BURLINGTON CITY $17,586.00
VT CALEDONIA COUNTY $1,498.50
VT CHESTER TOWN $3,375.00
VT ESSEX COUNTY $3,496.50
VT ESSEX JUNCTION VILLAGE $3,495.00
VT FRANKLIN COUNTY $8,616.83
VT GRAND ISLE COUNTY $1,560.00
VT HARDWICK TOWN $1,000.00
VT KILLINGTON TOWN $1,200.00
VT LAMOILLE COUNTY $2,810.14
VT MIDDLEBURY TOWN $2,451.00
VT MILTON TOWN $3,241.88
VT NORWICH TOWN $850.00
VT RANDOLPH TOWN $1,028.00
VT RUTLAND CITY $3,165.00
VT ROYALTON $850.00
VT SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY $4,615.00
VT SPRINGFIELD TOWN $1,747.50
VT ST ALBANS CITY $399.00
VT ST JOHNSBURY TOWN $4,577.50
VT STOWE TOWN $6,088.50
VT WASHINGTON COUNTY $3,400.00
VT WILMINGTON TOWN $995.00
VT WINDSOR TOWN $2,100.00
Totals for VT(32 Jurisdictions): $100,835.38
WA ABERDEEN CITY $9,093.88

WA ADAMS COUNTY $4,433.00
WA AIRWAY HEIGHTS CITY $6,750.00
WA ALGONA CITY $2,823.54
WA ARLINGTON CITY $8,769.02
WA AUBURN CITY $19,323.28
WA ASOTIN CITY $425.00
WA BAINBRIDGE ISLAND CITY $4,574.34
WA BATTLE GROUND CITY $3,292.59
WA BELLINGHAM CITY $22,100.00
WA BLACK DIAMOND TOWN $1,606.14
WA BONNEY LAKE CITY $6,018.96
WA BOTHELL CITY $6,379.75
WA BREMERTON CITY $8,426.93
WA BURLINGTON CITY $4,490.00
WA CASTLE ROCK CITY $335.00
WA CENTRALIA CITY $7,000.00
WA CHEHALIS CITY $3,363.00
WA CHELAN COUNTY $14,305.30
WA CHENEY CITY $682.11
WA CLALLAM COUNTY $14,433.23
WA CLARKSTON CITY $1,995.51
WA COSMOPOLIS CITY $1,936.58
WA DES MOINES CITY $5,722.44
WA DOUGLAS COUNTY $6,398.03
WA EAST WENATCHEE CITY $3,706.24
WA EDMONDS CITY $8,857.00
WA ELLENSBURG CITY $5,089.85
WA ENUMCLAW CITY $3,700.00
WA EPHRATA CITY $2,214.50
WA FEDERAL WAY CITY $32,268.51
WA FERNDALE CITY $2,331.00
WA GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY $13,134.81
WA HOQUIAM CITY $6,245.52
WA ISLAND COUNTY $6,677.01
WA KALAMA CITY $1,401.55
WA KELSO CITY $3,642.50
WA KENNEWICK CITY $14,891.45
WA KIRKLAND CITY $22,222.39
WA KITTITAS COUNTY $2,122.57
WA LACEY CITY $21,048.22
WA LAKE FOREST PARK CITY $1,862.50
WA LAKE STEVENS CITY $8,447.50
WA LAKEWOOD CITY $12,000.00
WA LANGLEY CITY $1,125.24
WA LEWIS COUNTY $7,644.33
WA LINCOLN COUNTY $7,423.81
WA LONGVIEW CITY $6,273.26
WA LYNNWOOD CITY $20,363.00
WA MARYSVILLE CITY $25,553.64

WA MASON COUNTY $10,692.06
WA MEDINA CITY $3,398.93
WA MERCER ISLAND CITY $8,172.08
WA MILL CREEK CITY $4,200.00
WA MILTON CITY $1,514.77
WA MONROE CITY $6,534.04
WA MOUNT VERNON CITY $9,664.69
WA MOUNTLAKE TERRACE CITY $4,985.93
WA MOXEE CITY $1,909.70
WA MUKILTEO CITY $7,349.20
WA NEWPORT CITY $1,390.00
WA OAK HARBOR CITY $5,287.20
WA OLYMPIA CITY $12,569.43
WA OTHELLO CITY $2,485.85
WA PASCO CITY $14,662.96
WA PORT ANGELES CITY $5,535.34
WA PORT TOWNSEND CITY $2,814.00
WA PULLMAN CITY $10,081.43
WA PUYALLUP CITY $23,687.41
WA RAYMOND CITY $1,765.07
WA REARDAN TOWN $1,994.41
WA REDMOND CITY $6,840.00
WA RICHLAND CITY $7,452.75
WA RIDGEFIELD CITY $2,247.43
WA SAN JUAN COUNTY $7,988.52
WA STEVENS COUNTY $3,492.77
WA SUMNER CITY $6,173.00
WA TOPPENISH CITY $2,877.62
WA TUKWILA CITY $3,666.46
WA UNION GAP CITY $567.57
WA WAHKIAKUM COUNTY $2,122.00
WA WALLA WALLA CITY $18,241.00
WA WALLA WALLA COUNTY $4,327.83
WA WAPATO CITY $1,452.34
WA WENATCHEE CITY $4,872.51
WA YAKIMA CITY $13,052.50
WA ZILLAH CITY $1,576.78
Totals for WA(87 Jurisdictions): $632,569.61
WI ALBANY VILLAGE $2,572.50
WI ALTOONA CITY $417.00
WI ANTIGO CITY $763.20
WI APPLETON CITY $8,500.00
WI ASHLAND CITY $3,066.98
WI ATHENS VILLAGE $835.00
WI BALDWIN VILLAGE $811.50
WI BARABOO CITY $7,775.00
WI BARRON COUNTY $1,980.00
WI BAYFIELD COUNTY $4,642.00
WI BAYSIDE VILLAGE $830.00

WI BEAVER DAM CITY $4,185.00
WI BELOIT CITY $9,432.00
WI BELOIT TOWN $2,125.00
WI BERLIN CITY $1,836.00
WI BOYCEVILLE VILLAGE $498.66
WI BROOKFIELD CITY $4,955.00
WI BROOKFIELD TOWN $2,062.50
WI BROWN DEER VILLAGE $3,927.00
WI BURLINGTON CITY $500.00
WI CALEDONIA TOWN $6,475.00
WI CEDARBURG CITY $8,255.00
WI CHIPPEWA COUNTY $16,800.00
WI CHIPPEWA FALLS CITY $3,420.00
WI COLUMBIA COUNTY $3,325.00
WI COLUMBUS CITY $1,900.00
WI CORNELL CITY $1,625.00
WI COTTAGE GROVE VILLAGE $2,009.45
WI CRAWFORD COUNTY $2,962.50
WI CRIVITZ VILLAGE $461.29
WI CUDAHY CITY $4,249.95
WI DE FOREST VILLAGE $2,375.00
WI DELAFIELD CITY $2,295.00
WI DODGE COUNTY $9,000.00
WI DOOR COUNTY $4,118.27
WI DOUGLAS COUNTY $6,240.00
WI DUNN COUNTY $7,080.00
WI EAGLE RIVER CITY $2,445.00
WI EAU CLAIRE CITY $4,935.00
WI EDGERTON CITY $1,275.00
WI ELKHORN CITY $3,400.00
WI ELM GROVE VILLAGE $1,995.00
WI FITCHBURG CITY $8,228.00
WI FOND DU LAC CITY $8,061.89
WI FORT ATKINSON CITY $2,375.00
WI FOX POINT VILLAGE $2,125.00
WI FRANKLIN CITY $6,000.00
WI FREMONT VILLAGE $565.00
WI GERMANTOWN VILLAGE $5,347.50
WI GLENDALE CITY $2,550.00
WI GRAFTON VILLAGE $3,433.50
WI GRAND CHUTE TOWN $3,508.00
WI GRANT COUNTY $3,447.00
WI GREEN COUNTY $7,455.00
WI GREENFIELD CITY $6,400.00
WI HALES CORNERS VILLAGE $2,003.00
WI HAMMOND VILLAGE $467.50
WI HARTFORD CITY $1,270.00
WI HILLSBORO CITY $1,450.00
WI HOLMEN VILLAGE $3,489.00

WI HORICON CITY $960.00
WI HUDSON CITY $1,732.50
WI HURLEY CITY $1,447.50
WI IOWA COUNTY $800.00
WI JACKSON COUNTY $1,951.93
WI JACKSON VILLAGE $1,275.00
WI JANESVILLE CITY $16,674.00
WI JEFFERSON COUNTY $13,937.50
WI JUNEAU COUNTY $22,050.00
WI KAUKAUNA CITY $2,941.03
WI KENOSHA CITY $24,667.50
WI KEWASKUM VILLAGE $1,599.98
WI KEWAUNEE COUNTY $2,800.00
WI KRONEWETTER TOWN $1,725.00
WI LA CROSSE CITY $7,024.95
WI LAKE DELTON VILLAGE $3,812.50
WI LAKE HALLIE VILLAGE $1,625.00
WI LAKE MILLS CITY $2,600.00
WI LANCASTER CITY $470.00
WI LANGLADE COUNTY $825.00
WI LINCOLN COUNTY $3,482.50
WI LINN TOWN $2,549.35
WI LITTLE CHUTE VILLAGE $3,000.00
WI LODI CITY $437.50
WI LUXEMBURG VILLAGE $799.10
WI MANAWA CITY $1,050.00
WI MANITOWOC CITY $8,257.00
WI MANITOWOC COUNTY $6,362.50
WI MARINETTE CITY $1,275.00
WI MARINETTE COUNTY $2,975.00
WI MARQUETTE COUNTY $3,075.00
WI MARSHFIELD CITY $5,016.66
WI MCFARLAND VILLAGE $431.46
WI MEDFORD CITY $876.00
WI MENASHA CITY $3,150.00
WI MENOMINEE COUNTY $1,273.50
WI MENOMONEE FALLS VILLAGE $6,299.93
WI MENOMONIE CITY $3,660.00
WI MEQUON CITY $7,200.00
WI MERRILL CITY $1,450.00
WI MIDDLETON CITY $2,375.00
WI MINOCQUA TOWN $2,232.00
WI MONDOVI CITY $2,254.80
WI MONROE CITY $3,105.00
WI MOUNT HOREB VILLAGE $2,325.00
WI MOUNT PLEASANT TOWN $12,445.00
WI MUKWONAGO TOWN $2,175.00
WI MUSKEGO CITY $456.30
WI NEENAH CITY $2,581.54

WI NEW BERLIN CITY $12,600.00
WI NEW GLARUS VILLAGE $2,681.00
WI NEW LONDON CITY $2,487.50
WI NEW RICHMOND CITY $8,450.00
WI NIAGARA CITY $523.29
WI OAK CREEK CITY $5,760.00
WI OCONOMOWOC CITY $1,874.98
WI OCONOMOWOC TOWN $1,988.00
WI OCONTO COUNTY $1,900.00
WI ONALASKA CITY $6,335.00
WI ONEIDA COUNTY $3,984.00
WI OREGON VILLAGE $1,900.00
WI OSHKOSH CITY $10,137.50
WI OZAUKEE COUNTY $4,517.50
WI PALMYRA VILLAGE $435.00
WI PEWAUKEE VILLAGE $4,444.00
WI PHILLIPS CITY $585.00
WI PIERCE COUNTY $4,000.20
WI PLEASANT PRARIE VILLAGE $6,375.00
WI PLOVER VILLAGE $3,084.65
WI PLYMOUTH CITY $1,285.00
WI PORTAGE CITY $1,050.00
WI PORTAGE COUNTY $5,980.00
WI PULASKI VILLAGE $3,780.00
WI RACINE CITY $11,025.00
WI RHINELANDER CITY $1,799.90
WI RICHLAND CENTER CITY $1,455.85
WI RICHLAND COUNTY $4,217.50
WI RIVER FALLS CITY $2,780.00
WI ROBERTS VILLAGE $1,047.00
WI RUSK COUNTY $1,660.00
WI SAUK COUNTY $5,700.00
WI SAUKVILLE VILLAGE $972.50
WI SCHOFIELD CITY $3,586.86
WI SHARON VILLAGE $837.19
WI SHAWANO CITY $2,125.00
WI SHAWANO COUNTY $3,150.00
WI SHEBOYGAN FALLS CITY $1,850.00
WI SHOREWOOD VILLAGE $2,800.00
WI SLINGER VILLAGE $4,600.00
WI SOUTH MILWAUKEE CITY $1,300.00
WI ST CROIX COUNTY $11,130.00
WI ST FRANCIS CITY $2,922.50
WI STEVENS POINT CITY $7,256.00
WI STURGEON BAY CITY $6,270.00
WI SUN PRAIRIE CITY $12,000.00
WI SUPERIOR CITY $10,770.00
WI SUMMIT VILLAGE $1,604.00
WI TAYLOR COUNTY $6,930.00

WI TOMAH CITY $1,707.50
WI TREMPEALEAU COUNTY $2,840.00
WI TWIN LAKES VILLAGE $4,585.97
WI VERONA CITY $2,902.50
WI VILAS COUNTY $2,750.00
WI WATERLOO CITY $475.00
WI WATERTOWN CITY $1,750.00
WI WAUKESHA CITY $10,000.00
WI WAUNAKEE VILLAGE $1,900.00
WI WAUPACA CITY $2,169.00
WI WAUPACA COUNTY $5,557.09
WI WAUSAU CITY $6,018.75
WI WAUWATOSA CITY $17,850.00
WI WEST ALLIS CITY $19,669.58
WI WEST BEND CITY $2,404.00
WI WEST SALEM VILLAGE $2,880.00
WI WHITEFISH BAY VILLAGE $1,465.00
WI WHITEWATER CITY $5,400.00
WI WILLIAMS BAY VILLAGE $1,440.00
WI WISCONSIN RAPIDS CITY $7,875.00
WI WOOD COUNTY $2,875.00
Totals for WI(179 Jurisdictions): $740,482.03
WV BECKLEY CITY $6,375.00
WV BLUEFIELD CITY $5,169.00
WV CHARLES TOWN CITY $720.00
WV CLARKSBURG CITY $3,110.00
WV HARDY COUNTY $4,387.50
WV HUNTINGTON CITY $17,200.00
WV JACKSON COUNTY $6,750.00
WV MARION COUNTY $3,284.50
WV MINGO COUNTY $7,110.00
WV MOOREFIELD TOWN $2,839.90
WV MORGANTOWN CITY $1,670.00
WV OAK HILL CITY $6,440.00
WV OHIO COUNTY $3,179.00
WV PRINCETON CITY $800.00
WV PUTNAM COUNTY $4,750.00
WV RAVENSWOOD CITY $2,448.07
WV SOUTH CHARLESTON CITY $2,437.50
WV VIENNA CITY $5,540.00
WV WEIRTON CITY $2,948.38
WV WINFIELD TOWN $1,200.00
WV WYOMING COUNTY $2,850.00
Totals for WV(21 Jurisdictions): $91,208.85
WY ALBANY COUNTY $12,448.00
WY CAMPBELL COUNTY $4,089.15
WY CASPER CITY $14,112.72
WY CHEYENNE CITY $23,304.75
WY CODY CITY $2,606.43

WY CONVERSE COUNTY $4,725.00
WY CROOK COUNTY $787.12
WY DOUGLAS CITY $3,225.00
WY EVANSTON CITY $4,232.00
WY FREMONT COUNTY $14,427.50
WY GILLETTE CITY $11,200.00
WY GOSHEN COUNTY $7,071.25
WY GREEN RIVER CITY $5,723.19
WY HOT SPRINGS COUNTY $2,406.80
WY LANDER CITY $7,650.00
WY LARAMIE CITY $14,659.13
WY LINCOLN COUNTY $5,129.50
WY MANDERSON TOWN $799.38
WY MILLS TOWN $4,092.10
WY MOORCROFT TOWN $651.00
WY NATRONA COUNTY $10,725.00
WY NIOBRARA COUNTY $1,697.50
WY PLATTE COUNTY $12,718.08
WY RIVERTON CITY $3,235.65
WY ROCK SPRINGS CITY $6,563.73
WY SARATOGA TOWN $1,386.61
WY SHERIDAN CITY $4,664.50
WY SHERIDAN COUNTY $7,721.87
WY SUBLETTE COUNTY $6,695.00
WY SWEETWATER COUNTY $9,753.90
WY THERMOPOLIS TOWN $2,800.00
WY UINTA COUNTY $14,174.00
Totals for WY(32 Jurisdictions): $225,475.86
Report Totals for (4237 Jurisdictions): $25,406,117.00

City of Milpitas, California

BUDGET CHANGE FORM
From (Credit) To (Debit)
Type of Change
Account Amount Account Amount
Check one:
Budget
Appropriation
Budget Transfer
100-3557 $ 7,629 100-721-4223 $ 7,629
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to accept the 2023 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant in the amount of $7,628.91 and approve a related budget appropriation.

BACKGROUND:

The Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) Grant Act of 1998 is a unique U.S. Department of Justice initiative designed to provide a critical resource to state and local law enforcement. The BVP program’s purpose is to reimburse state and local law enforcement up to fifty percent of body armor costs. The Milpitas Police Department has been participating in the BVP Grant Program consecutively since 2008.

The United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs and Bureau of Justice Assistance has awarded the Milpitas Police Department a BVP grant in the amount of $7,628.91. The grant will reimburse the City of Milpitas fifty (50) percent of the cost for each ballistic vest purchased between April 1, 2023 and August 31, 2025.

ANALYSIS:

The Police Officer’s Association Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) section 22.11 compels all uniformed officers to wear a ballistic vest and requires the City of Milpitas to provide each officer with a ballistic vest, and three ballistic vest covers. Officers not in a uniformed assignment, are required to wear a ballistic vest when circumstances dictate the need for the equipment. The life span of a ballistic vest is five years. After a five year period, all ballistic vests must be replaced as soon as reasonably possible.

The Police Department anticipates purchasing approximately eighteen (18) ballistic vests during this award period and the total expense will be approximately $15,257.82. Under this grant, the Department of Justice will reimburse the City of Milpitas fifty (50) percent of this cost, up to the grant award of $7,628.91.

Ballistic vests have been proven to save lives. The Chief of Police will continue to require officers to maintain this equipment in good working order and use the equipment consistent with the MOU, department policy, and sound officer safety practice.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Alternative 1: Refuse the 2023 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant of $7,628.91.

Pros: There are no identified benefits to this alternative.

Cons: The City would not be reimbursed for fifty (50) percent of the cost for each ballistic vest purchased by the Police Department through August 31, 2025.

Reason for Not Recommending: The City will incur the cost of bulletproof vests for sworn Police Department employees regardless of acceptance of the grant, therefore; refusal of the grant would result in the City incurring one hundred (100) percent of the cost of the needed bulletproof vests as opposed to fifty (50) percent of the cost.

FISCAL IMPACT:

If approved, the City will be reimbursed up to $7,628.91 for fifty (50) percent of the cost of the needed bulletproof vests, therefore; a budget appropriation is needed for $7,628.91 into the Police Department’s FY 2023-24 operating budget.

There are sufficient funds in the Police Department’s FY 2023-24 operating budget to cover the remainder of the cost for the acquisition of the bulletproof vests. Per the Council approved Budget Guidelines, any unused funds related to this grant will be carried over to the next fiscal year
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This item is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideline 15378(b).

RECOMMENDATION:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to accept the 2023 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant in the amount of $7,628.91 and approve a related budget appropriation.

ATTACHMENT(S):
(a) 2023 BVP Award List
(b) Budget Change Form
Check if City Council Approval required. Meeting: November 7, 2023 Requested by: Department Head: Jared Hernandez Date: November 7, 2023 Reviewed by: Finance Director: Lauren Lai Date: November 7, 2023 Approved by: City Manager: Ned Thomas Date: November 7, 2023 Date approved by City Council, if required: Confirmed by:

FI/24786/V Form 30-222 (Rev. 1/92)

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Grant Agreement with the Office of Traffic Safety to Accept the Fiscal Year 2024 Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program Grant and Approve a Related Budget Appropriation in the Amount of $110,000.00 (Staff Contact: Jared Hernandez, Chief of Police, 408-586-2406)
Category: Consent Calendar-Public Safety
Meeting Date: 11/7/2023
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute the grant agreement with the Office of Traffic Safety to Accept the Fiscal Year 2024 Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program Grant and approve a related budget appropriation in the amount of $110,000.00.

BACKGROUND:

The Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) administers the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) that offers grant funds from the California Office of Traffic Safety to reimburse law enforcement agencies for overtime expenditures specifically directed toward traffic safety operations.

The grant funding is directed at conducting best practice strategies to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in traffic related collisions involving impaired driving and other primary collision factors. The funded strategies may include enforcement operations focusing on impaired driving, distracted driving, nighttime seatbelt use, motorcycle safety, and pedestrian and bicycle safety. Operations are conducted in areas with a disproportionate number of traffic collisions. Other funded strategies may include public education and police department staff training.

The City of Milpitas has been approved for a grant of $110,000.00 to conduct driving under the influence (DUI) saturation patrols, DUI checkpoints, traffic enforcement operations, distracted driving enforcement, motorcycle safety, pedestrian and bicycle safety, public education, equipment purchases, and training on an overtime basis in conjunction with STEP between October 1, 2023 and September 30, 2024.

ANALYSIS:

The City of Milpitas is not required to accept the OTS STEP grant funding; however, traffic safety is a paramount concern in the City of Milpitas and this funding will help address traffic safety issues throughout the City. If accepted, the City of Milpitas must agree to utilize the funding for enforcement, public education, and/or training related to specific traffic safety issues on an overtime basis. Examples of specific issues include but are not limited to: DUI, distracted driving, seat belt violation, and pedestrian/bicycle safety. Enforcement and public education are important components to reducing collisions and saving lives. The spending period for this funding begins October 1, 2023 and concludes on September 30, 2024.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Alternative 1: Refuse the fiscal year 2024 Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program grant of $110,000.

Pros: There are no identified benefits to this alternative.

Cons: The Police Department would not be able to increase overtime enforcement, education, or training towards traffic safety.

Reason for Not Recommending: The FY 2024 OTS STEP grant award does not require matching funds nor are there any requirements that result in a negative impact. The City will be reimbursed for the expenses incurred.

FISCAL IMPACT:

A budget appropriation is needed for $110,000 for the overtime, equipment, and training expenditures in the Police Department’s operating budget. The expenditures will be reimbursed by the OTS STEP grant funding.

The grant does not require any matching funds.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

The action is continuing administrative or maintenance activity and is not a project pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378.

RECOMMENDATION:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to execute the grant agreement with the Office of Traffic Safety to Accept the Fiscal Year 2024 Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program Grant. (2) Approve a related budget appropriation in the amount of $110,000.00.

ATTACHMENT(S):
(a) Grant Agreement
(b) Budget Change Form

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 1 of 18

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT

GRANT NUMBER
PT24119

1. GRANT TITLE
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

2. NAME OF AGENCY 3. Grant Period
Milpitas From:

To:
10/01/2023
09/30/2024 4. AGENCY UNIT TO ADMINISTER GRANT
Milpitas Police Department

5. GRANT DESCRIPTION
Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. The funded strategies may include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors, distracted driving, night-time seat belt enforcement, special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety, enforcement and public awareness in areas with a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes, and educational programs. These strategies are designed to earn media attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect.

6. Federal Funds Allocated Under This Agreement Shall Not Exceed: $110,000.00

7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement:
 Schedule A – Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives and Method of Procedure  Schedule B – Detailed Budget Estimate and Sub-Budget Estimate (if applicable)  Schedule B-1 – Budget Narrative and Sub-Budget Narrative (if applicable)  Exhibit A – Certifications and Assurances
 Exhibit B* – OTS Grant Program Manual
 Exhibit C – Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access *Items shown with an asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto.

These documents can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.gov.

We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above described Grant terms and conditions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.

8. Approval Signatures
A. GRANT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

David Morris

Police Sergeant

[email protected]

(408) 586-2902

1275 N. Milpitas Blvd.

Milpitas, CA 95035
ADDRESS: Jared Hernandez

Acting Chief

[email protected]

(408) 586-2402

1275 N. Milpitas Blvd.

Milpitas, CA 95035
{{_es_signer2_signature}} {{_es_signer2_date}} {{_es_signer4_signature}} {{_es_signer4_date}} (Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)

C. FISCAL OFFICIAL

D. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
ADDRESS: Lauren Lai

Director of Finance

[email protected]

(408) 586-3111

1275 N. Milpitas Blvd.

Milpitas, CA 95035
ADDRESS: Barbara Rooney

Director

[email protected]

(916) 509-3030

2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758
{{_es_signer3_signature}} {{_es_signer3_date}} {{_es_signer6_signature}} {{_es_signer6_date}} (Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)

David C. Morris (Sep 27, 2023 18:55 EDT)
David C. Morris
Sep 27, 2023
Lauren Lai (Sep 27, 2023 15:59 PDT)
Lauren Lai
Sep 27, 2023
Jared Hernandez (Oct 4, 2023 21:48 PDT)
Oct 4, 2023
Oct 10, 2023

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 2 of 18

E. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 9. SAM INFORMATION NAME: Carolyn Vu

SAM #:

REGISTERED
ADDRESS:

CITY:

ZIP+4:

EZ77RK2NWKC8

455 E Calaveras Blvd
Milpitas
95035-5411
ADDRESS: 2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758

10. PROJECTED EXPENDITURES
FUND CFDA ITEM/APPROPRIATION F.Y. CHAPTER STATUTE PROJECTED

EXPENDITURES
164AL-24.1 20.608 0521-0890-101 2022 43/22 BA/22 $23,800.00 402PT-24.1 20.600 0521-0890-101 2022 43/22 BA/22 $13,600.00 402PT-24 20.600 0521-0890-101 2023 12/23 BA/23 $26,400.00 164AL-24 20.608 0521-0890-101 2023 12/23 BA/23 $46,200.00

AGREEMENT
TOTAL $110,000.00

AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS DOCUMENT
I CERTIFY upon my own personal knowledge that the budgeted funds for the current budget year are available for the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above.
$110,000.00

PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR THIS

AGREEMENT
$ 0.00
OTS ACCOUNTING OFFICER’S SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBERED TO DATE {{_es_signer5_signature}} {{_es_signer5_date}} $110,000.00

Carolyn Vu (Oct 5, 2023 08:03 PDT)
Oct 5, 2023

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 3 of 18

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule A

GRANT NUMBER
PT24119

1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
The City of Milpitas is located in northern Santa Clara County and is considered the "Crossroads of Silicon Valley" and has become a primary commuter connection between Silicon Valley and communities in the Central Valley. Highways I-680, I-880, State Route 237, and Montague Expressway bring a tremendous amount of vehicular traffic through the city. The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) currently operates a central hub at the Great Mall of Milpitas. In addition, the city has a Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station accompanied by a six-story parking garage that draws people from throughout the Bay Area (daily ridership is estimated at 10,000).

The current residential population of Milpitas exceeds 80,000 people. Although the city incorporates only

14.5 square miles and has 139 miles of surface streets, tens of thousands of vehicles travel through the city each day. This amount of vehicular traffic creates congestion and safety challenges for the city and its police department. Aside from being the crossroads for many drivers, Milpitas is also a destination for workers and consumers from various communities in the bay area. Corporate headquarters and satellite campuses of several international companies are located in Milpitas, and some of the major employers include Cisco Systems, Flextronics International, Linear Technology, Kaiser Permanente, and KLA-Tenor. The day time population in Milpitas is estimated to be over 100,000 people.

Milpitas is also the home of the Great Mall of the Bay Area, which is Northern California’s largest indoor outlet and shopping destination with more than 1.3 million square feet of retail floor space for more than 200 outlet & value stores and more than 32 dining options. The 11 anchor stores and businesses include Kohls, Dicks Sporting Goods, Bed Bath & Beyond, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Saks Fifth Avenue OFF 5th, Century Theaters, Burlington, and Dave and Buster’s. The Great Mall of the Bay Area attracts residents throughout Santa Clara County, neighboring Alameda County and throughout the Bay Area. Levi and Avaya stadiums also play a role in traffic congestion during hosted events. Amazon and Apple hubs are now open.

The Milpitas Police Department continues to address traffic safety concerns and congestion and one major focus has been attempting to reduce the crash rate on the major arterial roadways. The City of Milpitas has utilized OTS STEP grants in several years past and with continued funding will continue to address effort to reduce injury traffic crashes, DUI related injury crashes, fatal crashes, and PCF related violations. Reported traffic complaints, including school-related traffic issues, speeding vehicles, and pedestrian violations along our major thoroughfares and in our residential neighborhoods, are significant concerns of our community.

Complaints with traffic congestion have increased with the growing economy and city population. Traffic complaints are routed through the Traffic Safety Unit (TSU), and the volume of complaints is challenging for the unit to process. In prior years, the TSU consisted of a Traffic Lieutenant, a Traffic Sergeant, a Commercial Enforcement Officer, two (2) DUI Enforcement Officers, eight (8) motorcycle officers and one (1) Traffic Investigator. However, due to low staffing levels, The TSU is currently staffed with three (3) motorcycle officers and one (1) Sergeant. The TSU is responsible for handling all traffic related incidents, with the primary focus of enforcement of traffic laws, and it handles a majority of the vehicle crashes; traffic related calls for service; and issues a majority of the citations.

In 2022, the Milpitas Police Department responded to or initiated approximately 141 stand-alone DUI Arrests and an additional 61 arrests stemming from DUI -Related vehicle crashes. Since greater staffing numbers are not even yet on the horizon, it’s been through the generosity of the monies received through the Strategic Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP), the Milpitas Police Department has been able to maintain normal service operations, while also allowing the opportunity for additional officers to focus on directed enforcement. We continue to be more successful in addressing the problems associated with DUI drivers, red light runners, speeding vehicles, aggressive driving, and distracted driving. In addition, it will enable an enhanced pedestrian and bicyclist safety program.

2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
A. Goals:

1. Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic crashes.

2. Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic crashes.

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 4 of 18

3. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic crashes.

4. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic crashes.

5. Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic crashes.

6. Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic crashes.

7. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved crashes.

8. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved crashes.

9. Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved crashes.

10. Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved crashes.

11. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

12. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

13. Reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic crashes.

14. Reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic crashes.

15. Reduce hit & run fatal crashes.

16. Reduce hit & run injury crashes.

17. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) fatal crashes.

18. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) injury crashes.

B. Objectives: Target Number

1. Issue a press release announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15. The kick-off press releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at [email protected], and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 14 days prior to the issuance date of the release.
1 2. Participate and report data (as required) in the following campaigns; Quarter 1:

National Walk to School Day, National Teen Driver Safety Week, NHTSA Winter Mobilization; Quarter 3: National Distracted Driving Awareness Month, National Motorcycle Safety Month, National Bicycle Safety Month, National Click it or Ticket Mobilization; Quarter 4: NHTSA Summer Mobilization, National Child Passenger Safety Week, and California's Pedestrian Safety Month.
10 3. Develop (by December 31) and/or maintain a “DUI BOLO” program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. Updated DUI BOLOs should be distributed to patrol and traffic officers monthly. 12 4. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) (minimum 16 hours) POST-certified training. 1 5. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) 16 hour POST-certified training. 1 6. Send law enforcement personnel to the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training. 1

7. Conduct DUI/DL Checkpoints. A minimum of 1 checkpoint should be conducted during the NHTSA Winter Mobilization and 1 during the Summer Mobilization. To enhance the overall deterrent effect and promote high visibility, it is recommended the grantee issue an advance press release and conduct social media activity for each checkpoint. For combination DUI/DL checkpoints, departments should issue press releases that mention DL's will be checked at the DUI/DL checkpoint. Signs for DUI/DL checkpoints should read "DUI/Driver's License Checkpoint Ahead." OTS does not fund or support independent DL checkpoints. Only on an exception basis and with OTS pre-approval will OTS fund checkpoints that begin prior to 1800 hours. When possible, DUI/DL Checkpoint screeners should be DRE- or ARIDE-trained.
2 8. Conduct DUI Saturation Patrol operation(s). 22

9. Conduct Traffic Enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary crash factor violations.
7 10. Conduct highly publicized Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones and texting.
3 11. Conduct highly publicized Motorcycle Safety enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of motorcycle incidents or crashes resulting from unsafe speed, DUI, following too closely, unsafe lane changes, improper turning, and other primary crash factor violations by motorcyclists and other drivers. 1

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 5 of 18

12. Conduct highly publicized pedestrian and/or bicycle enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes resulting from violations made by pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. 4 13. Conduct Traffic Safety educational presentation(s) with an effort to reach community members. Note: Presentation(s) may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed, bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat belts and child passenger safety.
2 14.

15. Participate in highly visible collaborative DUI Enforcement operations. 5

16. Participate in highly visible collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations. 3

3. METHOD OF PROCEDURE
A. Phase 1 – Program Preparation (1st Quarter of Grant Year)  The department will develop operational plans to implement the “best practice” strategies outlined in the objectives section.
 All training needed to implement the program should be conducted in the first quarter.  All grant related purchases needed to implement the program should be made in the first quarter.  In order to develop/maintain the “DUI BOLOs,” research will be conducted to identify the “worst of the worst” repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. The DUI BOLO may include the driver’s name, last known address, DOB, description, current license status, and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. DUI BOLOs should be updated and distributed to traffic and patrol officers at least monthly.  Implementation of the STEP grant activities will be accomplished by deploying personnel at high crash locations.

Media Requirements Issue a press release approved by the OTS PIO announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15, but no sooner than October 1. The kick-off release must be approved by the OTS PIO and only distributed after the grant is fully signed and executed. If you are unable to meet the November 15 deadline to issue a kick-off press release, communicate reasons to your OTS coordinator and OTS PIO.

B. Phase 2 – Program Operations (Throughout Grant Year)  The department will work to create media opportunities throughout the grant period to call attention to the innovative program strategies and outcomes.

Media Requirements

The following requirements are for all grant-related activities:
 Send all media advisories, alerts, videos, graphics, artwork, posters, radio/PSA/video scripts, storyboards, digital and/or print educational materials for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days before the scheduled release but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
 The OTS PIO is responsible for the approval of the design and content of materials. The agency understands OTS PIO approval is not authorizing approval of budget expenditure or cost. Any cost approvals must come from the Coordinator.
 Pre-approval is not required when using any OTS-supplied template for media advisories, press releases, social media graphics, videos or posts, or any other OTS-supplied educational material.

However, copy the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS coordinator when any material is distributed to the media and public, such as a press release, educational material, or link to social media post. The OTS-supplied kick-off press release templates and any kickoff press releases are an exception to this policy and require prior approval before distribution to the media and public.
 If an OTS-supplied template, educational material, social media graphic, post or video is substantially changed, the changes shall be sent to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy to your OTS Coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days prior to the scheduled release date, but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
 Press releases, social media posts and alerts on platforms such as NextDoor and Nixle reporting immediate and time-sensitive grant activities (e.g. enforcement operations, day of event

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 6 of 18

highlights or announcements, event invites) are exempt from the OTS PIO approval process. The OTS PIO and your Coordinator should still be notified when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).
 Enforcement activities such as warrant and probation sweeps, court stings, etc. that are embargoed or could impact operations by publicizing in advance are exempt from the PIO approval process. However, announcements and results of activities should still be copied to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your Coordinator with embargoed date and time or with “INTERNAL ONLY: DO NOT RELEASE” message in subject line of email.  Any earned or paid media campaigns for TV, radio, digital or social media that are part of a specific grant objective, using OTS grant funds, or designed and developed using contractual services by a subgrantee, requires prior approval. Please send to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your grant coordinator at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date.
 Social media posts highlighting state or national traffic safety campaigns (Distracted Driving Month, Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month, etc.), enforcement operations (DUI checkpoints, etc.), or any other grant-related activity such as Bicycle rodeos, presentations, or events, are highly encouraged but do not require prior approval.
 Submit a draft or rough-cut of all digital, printed, recorded or video material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer graphics, digital graphics, social posts connected to an earned or paid media campaign grant objective) to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS Coordinator for approval prior to the production or duplication.  Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials, space permitting:

Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Space permitting, include the OTS logo on all grant-funded print materials, graphics and paid or earned social media campaign grant objective; consult your OTS Coordinator for specifics, format-appropriate logos, or if space does not permit the use of the OTS logo.  Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS Coordinator at least 21 days in advance, or when first confirmed, a short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program, particularly events that are highly publicized beforehand with anticipated media coverage so OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event.

If unable to attend, email the OTS PIO and coordinator brief highlights and/or results, including any media coverage (broadcast, digital, print) of event within 7 days following significant grant- related event or program. Media and program highlights are to be reflected in QPRs.  Any press releases, work plans, scripts, storyboards, artwork, graphics, videos or any educational or informational materials that received PIO approval in a prior grant year needs to be resubmitted for approval in the current grant year.
 Contact the OTS PIO or your OTS Coordinator for consultation when changes from any of the above requirements might be warranted.

C. Phase 3 – Data Collection & Reporting (Throughout Grant Year)

1. Prepare and submit grant claim invoices (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)

2. Prepare and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPR) (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)
 Collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives.  Provide a brief list of activity conducted, procurement of grant-funded items, and significant media activities. Include status of grant-funded personnel, status of contracts, challenges, or special accomplishments.
 Provide a brief summary of quarterly accomplishments and explanations for objectives not completed or plans for upcoming activities.
 Collect, analyze and report statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives.

4. METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the “Final Evaluation” section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 7 of 18

of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.

5. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
This program has full administrative support, and every effort will be made to continue the grant activities after grant conclusion.

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 8 of 18

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B

GRANT NUMBER
PT24119

FUND NUMBER CATALOG

NUMBER (CFDA)

FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
164AL-24 20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat
Offenders for Driving While
Intoxicated
$70,000.00
402PT-24 20.600 State and Community Highway
Safety
$40,000.00

COST CATEGORY FUND
NUMBER

UNIT COST OR
RATE

UNITS TOTAL COST TO
GRANT
A. PERSONNEL COSTS

Straight Time
$0.00
Overtime
DUI/DL Checkpoints 164AL-24 $11,500.00 2 $23,000.00
DUI Saturation Patrols 164AL-24 $1,500.00 22 $33,000.00 Collaborative DUI Enforcement 164AL-24 $1,400.00 5 $7,000.00 Traffic Enforcement 402PT-24 $1,000.00 7 $7,000.00
Distracted Driving 402PT-24 $1,000.00 3 $3,000.00
Motorcycle Safety 402PT-24 $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00
Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement 402PT-24 $1,000.00 4 $4,000.00 Collaborative Traffic Enforcement 402PT-24 $1,000.00 3 $3,000.00 Category Sub-Total $81,000.00
B. TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel 402PT-24 $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $2,000.00
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
D. EQUIPMENT
Changeable Message Sign Trailer with
Radar
402PT-24 $20,000.00 1 $20,000.00
Category Sub-Total $20,000.00
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies 164AL-24 $7,000.00 1 $7,000.00
Category Sub-Total $7,000.00
F. INDIRECT COSTS
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
GRANT TOTAL $110,000.00

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 9 of 18

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B-1

GRANT NUMBER
PT24119

BUDGET NARRATIVE

PERSONNEL COSTS
DUI/DL Checkpoints - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

DUI Saturation Patrols - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative DUI Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative DUI Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Distracted Driving - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Motorcycle Safety - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel

TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel - Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant goals and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included. Anticipated travel may include the California Traffic Safety Summit (November 7-8, 2023, in Orange County) and the OTS Traffic Safety Law Enforcement Forum. All conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Budget Narrative must be approved by OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant funds.

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
-

EQUIPMENT
Changeable Message Sign Trailer with Radar-Fully equipped changeable message sign trailer(s) with a radar device and digital display that is portable and fully programmable and will determine and display the speed of vehicles or post traffic safety information and messages during OTS funded operations.

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies - On-scene supplies needed to conduct sobriety checkpoints. Costs may include 28" traffic cones, MUTCD compliant traffic signs, MUTCD compliant high visibility vests (maximum of 10), traffic counters (maximum of 2), generator, gas for generators, lighting, reflective banners, electronic flares, PAS Device/Calibration Supplies, heater, propane for heaters, fan, anti-fatigue mats, and canopies.

Additional items may be purchased if approved by OTS. The cost of food and beverages will not be reimbursed. Each item must have a unit cost of less than $5,000 (including tax and shipping).

INDIRECT COSTS
-

STATEMENTS/DISCLAIMERS
There will be no program income generated from this grant.

Nothing in this “agreement” shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a particular law enforcement officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance of the goals and objectives here under.

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 10 of 18

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Exhibit A

GRANT NUMBER
PT24119

Certifications and Assurances for Fiscal Year 2024 Highway Safety Grants (23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 or Section 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Section 25024, Public Law 117-58)

The officials named on the grant agreement, certify by way of signature on the grant agreement signature page, that the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State rules, guidelines, policies, and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding. Applicable provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The State will comply with applicable statutes and regulations, including but not limited to:

 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4—Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended;  Sec. 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Sec. 25024, Public Law 117-58;  23 CFR part 1300—Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs;  2 CFR part 200—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards;  2 CFR part 1201—Department of Transportation, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.

NONDISCRIMINATION
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State highway safety agency [and its subrecipients] will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination (“Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities”). These include but are not limited to:

 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin);
 49 CFR part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination in Federally -Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation— Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);  28 CFR 50.3 (U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);  The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects);  Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-1686) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex);  Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability) and 49 CFR part 27;
 The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
 The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (Pub. L. 100-209), (broadens scope, coverage, and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally-funded or not);  Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing) and 49 CFR parts 37 and 38;
 Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (preventing discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low -income populations);
 Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency (requiring that recipients of Federal financial assistance provide meaningful access for applicants and beneficiaries who have limited English proficiency (LEP));
 Executive Order 13985, Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities through the Federal Government (advancing equity across the Federal Government); and  Executive Order 13988, Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation (clarifying that sex discrimination includes discrimination on the grounds of gender identity or sexual orientation).

The preceding statutory and regulatory cites hereinafter are referred to as the “Acts” and “Regulations,” respectively.

GENERAL ASSURANCES

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 11 of 18

In accordance with the Acts, the Regulations, and other pertinent directives, circulars, policy, memoranda, and/or guidance, the Recipient hereby gives assurance that it will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that:

“No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity, for which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance from DOT, including NHTSA.”

The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 clarified the original intent of Congress, with respect to Title VI of the Civil Rig hts Act of 1964 and other non-discrimination requirements (the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973), by restoring the broad, institutional-wide scope and coverage of these nondiscrimination statutes and requirements to include all programs and activities of the Recipient, so long as any portion of the program is Federally assisted.

SPECIFIC ASSURANCES
More specifically, and without limiting the above general Assurance, the Recipient agrees with and gives the following Assura nces with respect to its Federally assisted Highway Safety Grant Program:

1. The Recipient agrees that each “activity,” “facility,” or “program,” as defined in 49 CFR part 21 will be (with regard to an “activity”) facilitated, or will be (with regard to a “facility”) operated, or will be (with regard to a “program”) conducted in compliance with all requirements imposed by, or pursuant to the Acts and the Regulations.

2. The Recipient will insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests For Proposals for work, or material subject to the Acts and the Regulations made in connection with all Highway Safety Grant Programs and, in adapted form, in all proposals for negotiated agreements regardless of funding source:
“The [name of Recipient], in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.”

3. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix A and E of this Assurance (also referred in every contract or agreement subject to the Acts and the Regulations.

4. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix B of DOT Order 1050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a Recipient.

5. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the Assurance will extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith.

6. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance in the form of, or for the acquisition of, real property or an interest in real property, the Assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property.

7. That the Recipient will include the clauses set forth in appendix C and appendix D of this DOT Order 1050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, licenses, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the Recipient with other parties:
a. for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and
b. for the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program.

8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods:
a. the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or b. the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property.

9. The Recipient will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation or the official to whom he/she delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub- grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interes t, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.

10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.

By signing this ASSURANCE, the State highway safety agency also agrees to comply (and require any sub -recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, successors, transferees, and/or assignees to comply) with all applicable provisions governing NHTSA's access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff. You also recognize that you must comply with any program or complian ce reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted by NHTSA. You must keep records, reports, and submit the material for review

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 12 of 18

upon request to NHTSA, or its designee in a timely, complete, and accurate way. Additionally, you must comply with all other reporting, data collection, and evaluation requirements, as prescribed by law or detailed in program guidance.

The State highway safety agency gives this ASSURANCE in consideration of and for obtaining any Federal grants, loans, contrac ts, agreements, property, and/or discounts, or other Federal-aid and Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the recipients by the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Highway Safety Grant Program. This ASSURANCE is binding on the State highway safety agency, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors and their subcontractors', transferees, successors in interest, and any other participants in the Highway Safety Grant Program. The person(s) signing be low is/are authorized to sign this ASSURANCE on behalf of the Recipient.

THE DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 (41 U.S.C. 8103)
The Subgrantee will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace, and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition;
b. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about:

1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;

2. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;

3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs;

4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace;

5. Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a);
c. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will—

1. Abide by the terms of the statement;

2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction;
d. Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction;
e. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted—

1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination;

2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; f. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of all of the paragraphs above.

POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT)
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508), which limits the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)

CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;

2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions;

3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub - awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 13 of 18

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or loca l legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activiti es include both direct and indirect (e.g., “grassroots”) lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the a doption of a specific pending legislative proposal.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(applies to all subrecipients as well as States)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRIMARY TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION (STATES)

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective primary tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default or may pursue suspension or debarment.

4. The prospective primary tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary tier participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

5. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

6. The prospective primary tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.

7. The prospective primary tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lowe r tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective par ticipant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website (https://www.sam.gov/).

9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate the transaction for cause or default.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS —

PRIMARY TIER COVERED TRANSACTIONS

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 14 of 18

1. The prospective primary tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
a. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; b. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and
d. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

2. Where the prospective primary tier participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR LOWER TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance w as placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

4. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, per son, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.

6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website ( https://www.sam.gov/).

8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION —

LOWER TIER COVERED TRANSACTIONS

1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is prese ntly debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 15 of 18

2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

BUY AMERICA
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

The State and each subrecipient will comply with the Buy America requirement (23 U.S.C. 313) when purchasing items using Federal funds. Buy America requires a State, or subrecipient, to purchase with Federal funds only steel, iron and manufacture d products produced in the United States, unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestically produced items would be inconsistent with the public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory qualit y, or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. In order to use Federal funds to purchase foreign produced items, the State must submit a waiver request that provides an adequate basis and justific ation for approval by the Secretary of Transportation.

CERTIFICATION ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

No employee, officer, or agent of a State or its subrecipient who is authorized in an official capacity to negotiate, make, a ccept, or approve, or to take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving any subaward, including contracts or subcontracts, in connection with this grant shall have, directly or indirectly, any financial or personal interest in any such subaward. Such a financial or personal interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or personal inter est in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a subaward. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents. a. The code or standards shall provide that the recipient's officers, employees, or agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from present or potential subawardees, including contractors or parties to subcontracts.
b. The code or standards shall establish penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions for violations, as permitted by State or local law or regulations.

2. The recipient shall maintain responsibility to enforce the requirements of the written code or standards of conduct.

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

No State or its subrecipient, including its officers, employees, or agents, shall perform or continue to perform under a gran t or cooperative agreement, whose objectivity may be impaired because of an y related past, present, or currently planned interest, financial or otherwise, in organizations regulated by NHTSA or in organizations whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall disclose any conflict of interest identified as soon as reasonably possible, making an immediate and full disclosure in writing to NHTSA. The disclosure shall include a description of the action which the recipient has taken or proposes to take to avoid or mitigate such conflict.

2. NHTSA will review the disclosure and may require additional relevant information from the recipient. If a conflict of interest is found to exist, NHTSA may (a) terminate the award, or (b) determine that it is otherwise in the best interest of NHTSA to continue the award and include appropriate provisions to mitigate or avoid such conflict.

3. Conflicts of interest that require disclosure include all past, present, or currently planned organizational, financial, contractual, or other interest(s) with an organization regulated by NHTSA or with an organization whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities, and which are related to this award. The interest(s) that require disclosure include those of any recipient, affiliate, proposed consultant, proposed subcontractor, and key personnel of any of the above. Past interest shall be limited to within one year of the date of award. Key personnel shall include any person owning more than a 20 percent interest in a recipient, and the officers, employees or agents of a recipient who are responsible for making a decision or taking an action under an award where the decision or action can have an economic or other impact on the interests of a regulated or affected organization.

PROHIBITION ON USING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE (applies to all subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will not use 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage or to create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists.

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 16 of 18

POLICY ON SEAT BELT USE
In accordance with Executive Order 13043, Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States, dated April 16, 1997, the Grantee is encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees when operating company-owned, rented, or personally-owned vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is responsible for providing leadership and guidance in support of this Presidential initiative. For information and resources on traffic safety programs and policies for employers, please contact the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS), a public-private partnership dedicated to improving the traffic safety practices of employers and employees. You can download information on seat belt programs, costs of motor vehicle crashes to employers, and other traffic safety initiatives at www.trafficsafety.org. The NHTSA website (www.nhtsa.gov) also provides information on statistics, campaigns, and program evaluations and references.

POLICY ON BANNING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Mes saging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving, including policies to ban text messaging while driving company- owned or rented vehicles, Government-owned, leased or rented vehicles, or privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. States are also encouraged to conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as establishment of new rules and programs or re-evaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving, and education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving.

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 17 of 18

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ADDING OR UPDATING GEMS USERS

1. Each agency is allowed a total of FIVE (5) GEMS Users.

2. GEMS Users listed on this form will be authorized to login to GEMS to complete and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPRs) and reimbursement claims.

3. Complete the form if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s).

4. The Grant Director must sign this form and return it with the Grant Agreement.

CURRENT GEMS USER(S)

1. Lisa Beaulieu
Title: Management Analyst Media Contact: No
Phone: (408) 586-2434
Email: [email protected]

2. Joseph Heylen
Title: Sergeant Media Contact: Yes
Phone: (408) 586-2435
Email: [email protected]

3. Bryan Hinkley
Title: Sergeant Media Contact: No
Phone: (408) 586-2438
Email: [email protected]

4. David Morris
Title: Police Sergeant Media Contact: Yes
Phone: (408) 586-2902
Email: [email protected]

State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
OTS-55 Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access Exhibit C

GRANT NUMBER
PT24119

GRANT DETAILS
Grant Number: PT24119
Agency Name: Milpitas Police Department
Grant Title: Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Agreement Total: $110,000.00
Authorizing Official: Jared Hernandez
Fiscal Official: Lauren Lai
Grant Director: David Morris

9/19/2023 1:21:29 PM Page 18 of 18

Complete the below information if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s)

GEMS User 1
Add/Change {{[]c11_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[] c12_es_:signer1}}

Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c1_es_:signer1}} No{{[]c2_es_:signer1}} {{UserName1_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle1_es_:signer1 }} Name Job Title
{{UserEmail1_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone1_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 2
Add/Change {{[]c13_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c14_es_:signer1}}

Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c3_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c4_es_:signer1}} {{UserName2_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle2_es_:signer1 }} Name Job Title
{{UserEmail2_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone2_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 3
Add/Change {{[]c15_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c16_es_:signer1}}

Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c5_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c6_es_:signer1}} {{UserName3_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle3_es_:signer1 }} Name Job Title
{{UserEmail3_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone3_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 4
Add/Change {{[]c17_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c18_es_:signer1}}

Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c8_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c7_es_:signer1}} {{UserName4_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle4_es_:signer1 }}

Name

Job Title
{{UserEmail4_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone4_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 5
Add/Change {{[]c19_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c20_es_:signer1}}

Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c9_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c10_es_:signer1}} {{UserName5_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle5_es_:signer1 }} Name Job Title
{{UserEmail5_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone5_es_:signer1 }}

Email address

Phone number
Form completed by: {{Sig_es_:signer1:signature}} Date: {{Dte1_es_:signer1:date}}

As a signatory I hereby authorize the listed individual(s) to represent and have GEMS user access. {{Sig_es_:signer2:signature}} {{Name1_es_:signer2:fullname }} Signature Name
{{Dte2_es_:signer2:date}} Grant Director
Date Title

David C. Morris (Sep 20, 2023 09:26 PDT)
David C. Morris
Sep 20, 2023
David C. Morris (Sep 27, 2023 18:55 EDT)
David C. Morris
David C. Morris
Sep 27, 2023

Grant Agreement - PT24119
Final Audit Report 2023-10-10
Created: 2023-09-19
By: Jim Owens ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA13yVTvindPAz_d7CMuT48YfK_jDDsLQD "Grant Agreement - PT24119" History
Document created by Jim Owens ([email protected])
2023-09-19 - 8:21:45 PM GMT
Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2023-09-19 - 8:21:53 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023-09-20 - 0:00:29 AM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as David C. Morris 2023-09-20 - 4:26:21 PM GMT
Document e-signed by David C. Morris ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-09-20 - 4:26:23 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2023-09-20 - 4:26:24 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023-09-20 - 4:29:20 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023-09-27 - 10:54:08 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as David C. Morris 2023-09-27 - 10:55:56 PM GMT
Document e-signed by David C. Morris ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-09-27 - 10:55:58 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2023-09-27 - 10:55:59 PM GMT

Email viewed by [email protected]
2023-09-27 - 10:58:20 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Lauren Lai 2023-09-27 - 10:59:02 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Lauren Lai ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2023-09-27 - 10:59:04 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature 2023-09-27 - 10:59:06 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023-09-29 - 0:52:32 AM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2023-10-04 - 11:16:01 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Jared Hernandez 2023-10-05 - 4:48:19 AM GMT
Document e-signed by Jared Hernandez ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-10-05 - 4:48:21 AM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Carolyn Vu ([email protected]) for signature 2023-10-05 - 4:48:23 AM GMT
Email viewed by Carolyn Vu ([email protected])
2023-10-05 - 3:03:43 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Carolyn Vu ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-10-05 - 3:03:51 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Barbara Rooney ([email protected]) for signature 2023-10-05 - 3:03:53 PM GMT
Email viewed by Barbara Rooney ([email protected]) 2023-10-10 - 4:17:16 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Barbara Rooney ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2023-10-10 - 4:17:27 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2023-10-10 - 4:17:27 PM GMT

City of Milpitas, California

BUDGET CHANGE FORM
From (Credit) To (Debit)
Type of Change
Account Amount Account Amount
Check one:
Budget
Appropriation
Budget Transfer
267-3557 $110,000 267-722-4113
267-722-4505
267-722-4873
267-722-4223
$81,000
$2,000
$20,000
$7,000
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute the grant agreement with the Office of Traffic Safety to Accept the Fiscal Year 2024 Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program Grant and approve a related budget appropriation in the amount of $110,000.00.

BACKGROUND:

The Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) administers the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) that offers grant funds from the California Office of Traffic Safety to reimburse law enforcement agencies for overtime expenditures specifically directed toward traffic safety operations.

The grant funding is directed at conducting best practice strategies to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in traffic related collisions involving impaired driving and other primary collision factors. The funded strategies may include enforcement operations focusing on impaired driving, distracted driving, nighttime seatbelt use, motorcycle safety, and pedestrian and bicycle safety. Operations are conducted in areas with a disproportionate number of traffic collisions. Other funded strategies may include public education and police department staff training.

The City of Milpitas has been approved for a grant of $110,000.00 to conduct driving under the influence (DUI) saturation patrols, DUI checkpoints, traffic enforcement operations, distracted driving enforcement, motorcycle safety, pedestrian and bicycle safety, public education, equipment purchases, and training on an overtime basis in conjunction with STEP between October 1, 2023 and September 30, 2024.

ANALYSIS:

The City of Milpitas is not required to accept the OTS STEP grant funding; however, traffic safety is a paramount concern in the City of Milpitas and this funding will help address traffic safety issues throughout the City. If accepted, the City of Milpitas must agree to utilize the funding for enforcement, public education, and/or training related to specific traffic safety issues on an overtime basis. Examples of specific issues include but are not limited to: DUI, distracted driving, seat belt violation, and pedestrian/bicycle safety.

Enforcement and public education are important components to reducing collisions and saving lives. The spending period for this funding begins October 1, 2023 and concludes on September 30, 2024.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Alternative 1: Refuse the fiscal year 2024 Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program grant of $110,000.

Pros: There are no identified benefits to this alternative.

Cons: The Police Department would not be able to increase overtime enforcement, education, or training towards traffic safety.

Reason for Not Recommending: The FY 2024 OTS STEP grant award does not require matching funds nor are there any requirements that result in a negative impact. The City will be reimbursed for the expenses incurred.

FISCAL IMPACT:

A budget appropriation is needed for $110,000 for the overtime, equipment, and training expenditures in the Police Department’s operating budget. The expenditures will be reimbursed by the OTS STEP grant funding. The grant does not require any matching funds.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

The action is continuing administrative or maintenance activity and is not a project pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378.

RECOMMENDATION:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to execute the grant agreement with the Office of Traffic Safety to Accept the Fiscal Year 2024 Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program Grant. (2) Approve a related budget appropriation in the amount of $110,000.00.

ATTACHMENT(S):
(a) Grant Agreement
(b) Budget Change Form
Check if City Council Approval required. Meeting: November 7, 2023 Requested by: Department Head: Jared Hernandez Date: November 7, 2023 Reviewed by: Finance Director: Lauren Lai Date: November 7, 2023 Approved by: City Manager: Ned Thomas Date: November 7, 2023 Date approved by City Council, if required: Confirmed by:

FI/24786/V Form 30-222 (Rev. 1/92)

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Adopt a Resolution to Reject a Bid Protest from Iteris; Award IFB 24-025 and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Purchase Order with Econolite Control Products, Inc. in the amount of $127,871.66 for the Purchase of 25 Citywide Traffic Detection Cameras (Staff Contact: Christian Di Renzo, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602)
Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 11/7/2023
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution to reject a bid protest from Iteris; award IFB 24-025 and authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase order with Econolite Control Products, Inc. in the amount of $127,871.66 for the purchase of 25 citywide traffic detection cameras.

BACKGROUND:

Public Works is responsible for the repairs, replacement, and minor improvements to streetlights, signage, and traffic control devices. Funding was programmed in FY 2023-2024 Capital Budget for the purchase of traffic signal cameras. These cameras will primarily replace and upgrade existing cameras as well install new cameras at select intersections throughout the City of Milpitas. This enhancement would improve traffic safety and operations.

ANALYSIS:

On August 31, 2023, the City’s Purchasing Division released Invitation for Bid (IFB) No. 24-025 for the purchase of 25 traffic cameras . The IFB outlined the City’s need for 25 of these cameras as well as associated parts, materials, and components for their successful implementation in the field. Two firms responded to the IFB by the published closing date of September 28, 2023.The bids received were reviewed by Purchasing staff for compliance and responsiveness and accepted. Iteris submitted a base bid in the amount of $165,928.90.

Econolite Control Products, Inc. submitted a base bid in the amount of $127,871.66. Bid results were posted on September 29, 2023 (Attachment 2). The difference between the two qualifying bids was $38,057.24.

In the solicitation, the City specified the Iteris cameras for compatibility with currently deployed models in the field. One bid was submitted by Econolite Control Products, Inc. in response to the IFB. The substitution was reviewed and accepted by staff and was determined to meet or exceed the quality and requirements of the item listed in the specifications. A bid protest from Iteris (Attachment 3) was received on October 9, 2023 and was reviewed by the City Attorney. The bid protest submitted by Iteris was due to the bid specification stating Iteris products, but the awardee is proposing similar products that meet or exceed the IFB requirements.

The City determine the ground for appeal is without merit. According to Section 6.19 of the Bid Instructions, “Manufacturer’s names, trade names, brand names, model and catalog numbers used in these specifications are for the purpose of describing and establishing general quality levels. Such references are not intended to be restrictive. Bids proposing substitute brands will be considered provided the substitute brand meets or exceeds the quality and requirements of the item listed in the specifications.” Additionally, according to Section

6.20 of the Bid Instructions, “Bids will be considered on equipment or material complying substantially with specifications, provided: 1) any deviation is stated in writing and 2) each substitution is described in detail explaining how the alternative equipment or material is equal to or better than the specified equipment or material.” After review of the bids, the City issued a notice of intent to award the purchase agreement to the lowest responsible bidder, Econolite Control Products, Inc.

Iteris’s protest is without merit and notice of intent to recommend rejection of the bid protest was sent to Iteris on October 18, 2023 (Attachment 4). Staff recommends that the City Council reject Iteris’s bid protest and

authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase order with Econolite Control Products, Inc. in the amount of $127,871.66 for the purchase of 25 citywide traffic detection cameras.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Alternative 1: Do not award IFB 24-025 to Econolite Control Products,Inc.

Pros: None.

Cons: If the purchase of traffic cameras is not awarded to Econolite Control Products, Inc., staff would have to rebid the project with little expectation of different results. Further delaying the installation of traffic cameras at select intersections.

Reason for Not Recommending: Installation would be further delayed resulting in less than efficient traffic operations at select intersections.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The funding source for CIP 3440 is from Gas Tax and General Government CIP Fund. As of 10/25/2023, the balance in CIP No. 3440 – Annual Street Light, Signal, and Signage is $641,449 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):
o The project has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a project pursuant to Pub.

Resources Code, § 21065 and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a resolution to reject a bid protest from Iteris; award IFB 24-025 and authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase order with Econolite Control Products, Inc. in the amount of $127,871.66 for the purchase of 25 citywide traffic detection cameras.

Attachment(s):
1: Resolution
2: Bid Results
3: Bid Protest from Iteris
4: Notice of Intent to Reject Bid Protest from City

5. City of Milpitas Purchase Order Terms and Conditions for Equipment

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS REJECTING A BID

PROTEST FROM ITERIS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

PURCHASE ORDER WITH THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER SUBMITTING A RESPONSIVE BID, ECONOLITE CONTROLS PRODUCTS, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $127,871.66 FOR PURCHASE OF 25 CITYWIDE TRAFFIC DETECTION CAMERAS WHEREAS, Public Works is responsible for the repairs, replacement, and minor improvements to streetlights, signage, and traffic control devices. Funding was programmed in FY 2023-2024 Capital Budget for the purchase of 25 traffic signal cameras; and
WHEREAS, On August 31, 2023, the City’s Purchasing Division released Invitation for Bid (IFB) No. 24-025 for the purchase of 25 traffic cameras or equal; and WHEREAS, the IFB was publicly noticed in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code, advertised on the City’s website, emailed to companies registered with the City via Procurement OpenGov.com, the City’s eProcurement system. Additionally, each IFB was published on the City’s website; and
WHEREAS, on September 28, 2023, two bid proposals were received from Iteris and Econolite Control Products, Inc; and
WHEREAS, one bid protest from Iteris was filed with the City within five (5) days of the bid opening; and
WHEREAS, the bid protest from Iteris was deemed meritless and a notice of intent to reject the bid protest was delivered to Iteris; and
WHEREAS, the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsible bid is Econolite Controls Product, Inc., in the base bid amount of $127,871.66; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the project budget to award the base bid item under Econolite Control Products, Inc. bid amount in the amount of $127,871.66; and WHEREAS, staff recommends the City Council reject the bid protest from Iteris, as meritless for the reasons specified in the Notice and authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase order for the Base Bid items to Econolite Control Products, Inc., in the total amount of $127,871.66 in accordance with State law.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

1. The City Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council hereby rejects the bid protest Iteris as meritless for the reason specified in the Notice.

2 Resolution No. ____

3. The City Council hereby awards the purchase agreement to and authorizes the City Manager to execute the purchase order with the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid, Econolite Control Products, Inc., for the Base Bid items in the amount of $127,871.66 for the purchase of 25 citywide traffic detection cameras.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_____________________________ __________________________ Suzanne Guzetta, City Clerk Carmen Montano, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Michael Mutalipassi, City Attorney

PURCHASING DIVISION
IFB FOR: City Wide Traffic Detection Cameras
IFB NO: 24-025
DUE DATE: September 28, 2023
BUYER: S. Pietrobono
Econolite Control Products
Inc.
15890 Foothill Blvd.

San Leandro, CA 94578
Iteris
1700 Carnegie Ave.

Santa Ana, CA 92705
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Base Bid (if applicable) $127,871.66 $165,928.90

* Disqualified – Reason
**BID AWARD IN PROGRESS** City Council Date: (put in the date) AWARD TO: (Put in company name) Lowest Most Responsive, Responsible Bidder Meeting Specifications CODE KEY: INA = Information Not Available NS = Not Stated NB = No Bid DY = Days WK = Weeks HR = Hours

1700 Carnegie Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Dear Suzanne Guzzetta,
My name is Caroline McDonnell from Iteris and I would like to protest the following bid: City Wide Traffic Detection Cameras, Project ID #24-025.

We're protesting the bid due to the bid specification station Iteris products, but the awardee was not the written specification. We would appreciate the opportunity to rebid this project to ensure the City receives the products that are currently specified for Milpitas.

As stated in Section III. Scope of Work under Section III.A Scope of Work, Iteris is directly specified as the identified traffic detection system in bold lettering. For example, under Product Name under Scope of Work: "NEXT-CCU-SM4-TS2-PAK" is Iteris' part number for our Vantage Next CCU, Shelf-Mount Unit, for TS2 applications. The City also asked for "VECTOR-NEXT" under Product Name in the same section which is a specific Iteris' part number.

As stated in Section V. Pricing Proposal, Iteris is also specifically identified in Line Items 1-8 before each items description in the Pricing Table. For example: Line Item 5 - Iteris TS2CABLE-2070.

Under these conditions, we ask that the City reconsider the current awardee as Iteris was named and identified as the system that best meets the City of Milpitas' needs.

Caroline McDonnell
Iteris
District Sales Manager, Western Region
415.450.7063
[email protected]
Sincerely,

iJi
CITY
OF

MILPITAS

PUBLICWORKSDEPARTMENT
1265NMilpitasBlvd.,Milpitas,Calfornia95035-5411www.milpitas.gov Phone:408-586-2600Fax:408-586-2608
October18,2023
CarolineMcDonnell
Iteris
1700CarnegieAvenue
SantaAna,CA92705
SUBJECT:CityofMilpitasIFB24-025CityWideTrafficDetectionCameras-NoticeofIntenttoReject BidProtest
DearMs.McDonnell:

IhavereviewedyourprotestletterreceivedonOctober9,2023regardingpostingofbidresultsandfind thatyourprotesthasbeenrejectedwithoutfurtherreview.

ThesolicitationclosedonSeptember28,2023,andpendingBidResultswerepostedontheCitywebsite onSeptember29,2023.Thebidresultsidentifiedallbiddersandamounts.Afterreviewofthebids, EconoliteControlProducts,Inc.wasdeterminedtobethelowestresponsivebidder.

Inthesolicitation,theCityspecifiedtheIteriscamerasforcompatibilitywithcurrentlydeployedmodelsin thefield.Thesubstitutionreceivedwasreviewedandacceptedbystaffandwasdeterminedtomeetor exceedthequalityandrequirementsoftheitemlistedinthespecifications.AccordingtoSection6.19of theBidInstructions,“Manufacturer’snames,tradenames,brandnames,modelandcatalognumbersused inthesespecificationsareforthepurposeofdescribingandestablishinggeneralqualitylevels.Such referencesarenotintendedtoberestrictive.Bidsproposingsubstitutebrandswillbeconsideredprovided thesubstitutebrandmeetsorexceedsthequalityandrequirementsoftheitemlistedinthespecifications.” Additionally,accordingtoSection6.20oftheBidInstructions,“Bidswillbeconsideredonequipmentor materialcomplyingsubstantiallywithspecifications,provided:1)anydeviationisstatedinwritingand2) eachsubstitutionisdescribedindetailexplaininghowthealternativeequipmentormaterialisequaltoor betterthanthespecifiedequipmentormaterial.”
TheCityCouncilwillconsiderawardofthiscontractatitsmeetingonNovember7,2023.Citystaffintends torecommendrejectionofIteris’sprotestasmeritlessandexecutethepurchaseordertothelowest responsiblebiddersubmittingaresponsivebid,EconoliteControlProducts,Inc.

WewouldliketotakethisopportunitytothankyouforyourinterestindoingbusinesswiththeCityof MilpitasandremindyouthattherewillbefutureprojectstheCityhopesyouwillrespondtowhenanIFB orRFPisissued.Ihaveanyquestions,pleasegivemeacallat(408)586-2602.

ChristianDiRenzo
PublicWorksDirector
cdirenzomilpitas.gov
cc:MichaelMutalipassi,CityAttorney
cc:Iteris

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Receive an Update on the Emergency Repairs to the HVAC System and Equipment at City Hall and at the Public Works/Information Technology/Police Department Buildings and Determine that the Condition Continues to Constitute an Emergency (Staff Contact: Christian DiRenzo, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602)
Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 11/7/2023
Recommendation: (1) Receive an update on the emergency repairs to the HVAC system and equipment at City Hall and at the Public Works/Information Technology/Police Department Buildings; and (2) Determine by a four-fifths vote that the condition continues to constitute an emergency.

BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22050 and the attached Council Resolution No. 9134, the Director of Public Works, in the case of emergency, may authorize a repair of a public facility and procure the work without giving notice for bids. An emergency is defined as “a sudden, unexpected occurrence that poses a clear and imminent danger, requiring immediate action to prevent or mitigate the loss or impairment of life, health, property, or essential public services.” Additionally, State law requires the Public Works Director, as the City official with delegated authority to take emergency action, to report any emergency authorization and the reason(s) for the authorization to the City Council not later than seven days after the action, or at its next regularly scheduled meeting if that meeting will occur not later than 14 days after the action. Further, the Public Works Director is required to report why the emergency would not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids and the City Council is required to review the emergency action at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the emergency repair is completed. The City Council shall continue to review the emergency action at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the action is terminated. At each review, the City Council shall determine, by a four-fifths vote, whether there is a need to continue the action.

Consistent with applicable State law and Council Resolution, on April 27, 2023, the Public Works Director declared an emergency and authorized the City to contract with its existing HVAC maintenance contractor, Environmental Systems Inc. (ESI), for the emergency repairs to the HVAC system at City Hall and the Public Works, Information Technology and Police Department buildings. The Information Memorandum issued on that date outlined the various equipment issues and provided a cost estimate of $ 899,300.

STATUS UPDATE:

Below is a current update on the status of emergency repairs to the HVAC systems at City Hall and the Public Works, Information Technology and Police Department Buildings.

City Hall
The scope of work authorized repairs to the boiler, air handlers, and variable air volume (VAV) boxes to the City Hall building.

The contractor has begun the installation of the boilers for City Hall. The boilers will require additional work be completed to the piping in order to finalize the installation. The contractor is still making the necessary repairs to the VAV boxes. All repairs are expected to be completed by early December.

Staff will be meeting with the contractor the beginning of November to discuss the design phase for the replacement of the air handlers (AH1 and AH2) at City Hall.

Public Works/Information Technology/Police Department
At this facility, the Building Management System (BMS), boiler pumps and VAV boxes were identified as in need of emergency repairs.

The installation of the new boiler and chiller pumps have been completed. The contractor is currently working on the repair of the ten (10) VAV boxes and valves on the Public Works and Information Technology portion of the building. Wiring for the update to the BMS system is also being completed concurrently. All repairs are expected to be completed early December.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Alternative 1: None
Pros:

Cons:

Reason for Not Recommending:

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funding for these repairs is available in the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget and has been fully encumbered CIP Project 3499 - HVAC Systems Repairs funded $620,000 for the upgrades to the Building Management System (BMS) and Variable Air Flow (VAV) boxes at both buildings. The remaining repairs were funded by CIP Project 3406 – City Building Improvements in the amount of $279,300.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

The emergency repair work is exempt from CEQA, per CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities and 15302, Replacement or Reconstruction.

RECOMMENDATION:
(1) Receive an update on the emergency repairs to the HVAC system and equipment at City Hall and at the Public Works/Information Technology/Police Department Buildings; and (2) Determine by a four-fifths vote that the condition continues to constitute an emergency.

ATTACHMENT(S):

None

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Funding Agreement Between the City of Milpitas and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority for Grant Funds from the 2010 Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee Countywide Program in an Amount Not to Exceed $120,000.00 (Staff Contact: Christian Di Renzo, Public Works Director, (408) 586-2602)
Category: Consent Calendar-Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 11/7/2023
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a funding agreement between the City of Milpitas and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority for grant funds from the 2010 Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee Countywide Program in an amount not to exceed $120,000.00.

BACKGROUND:

Senate Bill 83 (Hancock), signed into law in 2009, authorized countywide transportation agencies such as the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to implement a Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) of up to $10 on motor vehicles registered within the county to pay for transportation programs and projects. The legislation requires that the revenue collected is used on programs and projects with a relationship or benefit to the owners of motor vehicles paying the fee. Subsequently, Santa Clara County voters approved a VRF on November 2, 2010 – Measure B.

The adopted VTA Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) expenditure plans allocates funding into three tiers:
•80% - Local Road Improvement and Repair Program
•15% - Countywide Program
•5% - Program Administration
The attached funding agreement is to receive funds from the Countywide Program which sets aside funding for Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Technologies, which includes traffic control signals, safety and traveler information systems.

ANALYSIS:

In 2021, VTA approached the cities of Milpitas, San Jose, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale, as well as the County of Santa Clara to propose a multi-jurisdictional transportation technology project on a corridor which they deemed as “multi-modal” and of “regional significance.”
The project location is along Great Mall Parkway-Tasman Drive, Fair Oaks Avenue, and Java Drive corridors between I-880 in Milpitas and Mathilda Avenue in Sunnyvale. The project also includes a spur along the North First Street corridor including three intersections at N. First Street/Orchard Parkway, N. First Street/Montague Expressway, and N. First Street/River Oaks Parkway.

A project proposal from VTA to the four cities and County stated that the corridor between I-880 and Mathilda Avenue and N. First Street is a multi-modal corridor of regional significance because:
•There are both morning and afternoon commute routes connecting multiple jurisdictions. •Provides access to large residential areas and employment centers located along the corridor.

•VTA operates light rail with frequent service, including at the Great Mall Station which is expected to grow in significance due to its connection to the Milpitas BART station; and •The VTA Bikeways Map designates a bike route of regional significance along this corridor. Approximately 2/3 of the project corridor has bicycle lanes on the roadway.

In Milpitas, the City will purchase traffic signals controller cabinets, controllers and back-up battery systems for City traffic signals. This equipment will support multi-modal operations on Tasman Drive (between I-880 and McCarthy Boulevard) corridor. In addition, it will allow the City to update traffic controller software to ensure interoperability among the traffic signal controller operators along the corridor, promote seamless operations across jurisdictional lines, and provide for multi-modal functions to accommodate transit, bicycles, and pedestrians.

Each of the jurisdictions participating in this project would receive a commensurate portion of the project funds based on the projected costs of the equipment and implementation costs. The City has gathered equipment cost estimates and further negotiated with VTA to mutually agree on a project award of up to $120,000. This amount also includes a 10% administration fee which will be valuable to support the oversight and administration of this project.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Alternative 1: Do not enter into a funding agreement with VTA for VRF Countywide Program Funds.

Pros: None identified.

Cons: It will not be possible to complete this project along the identified project corridor, as a significant portion of the project is within the City limits, including a light rail connection near the Milpitas BART station.

Reason for Not Recommending: The City will lose the opportunity to use voter-approved VRF fees that are earmarked for transportation projects benefiting the owners of motor vehicles that are paying this fee.

FISCAL IMPACT:

As discussed, the City will receive up to $120,000 (on a reimbursement basis) for the purchase and implementation of traffic signals controller cabinets, controllers and back-up battery systems for City traffic signals to support multi-modal operations on Tasman Drive (between I-880 and McCarthy Boulevard) corridor, including 10% to support the City’s administration of the project. The Public Works Director will serve as the project liaison for the term of the agreement, which will be in effect until the completion of the project or December 31, 2024. The monies will be appropriated in CIP 3440 Annual Street Light, Signal, and Signage project.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

The project entails the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use and is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15301.

RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize the City Manager to enter into a funding agreement between the City of Milpitas and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority for grant funds from the 2010 Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee Countywide Program in an amount not to exceed $120,000.

ATTACHMENT(S):
(a) Resolution
(b) Funding Agreement

(c) VTA Recommendation for Project Approval Memo
(d) Budget Change Form

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MILPITAS

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR 2010 MEASURE B VEHICLE

REGISTRATION FEE COUNTYWIDE PROGRAM FUNDS
Whereas, in November of 2010, the voters of Santa Clara County authorized a ten-dollar ($10) increase in the Vehicle Registration Fee (“VRF”), referred to hereinafter as the “PROGRAM,” for transportation-related projects and adopted an expenditure plan which allocates the revenue to transportation-related programs and projects that have a relationship or benefit to the persons who pay the fee; and
Whereas, the VTA Board of Directors has adopted administrative procedures for the PROGRAM; and
Whereas, these administrative procedures state that Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) will execute program funding agreements with project grantees; and Whereas, the PROGRAM includes a “Countywide Program” that includes Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) technologies as an eligible project category; and Whereas, on August 4, 2016, the VTA Board approved VRF ITS funds for the Multijurisdictional Transportation Technology project (“PROJECT”); and Whereas, each the City of Milpitas and VTA desire to specify the terms and conditions under which VRF-ITS project grants are conducted and financed and have drafted a funding agreement to specify such terms.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Milpitas hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into a funding agreement with Valley Transportation Authority to allocate one-hundred twenty-thousand dollars ($120,000) from 2010 Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee Countywide Program funds for the implementation of an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of November, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

FUNDING

AGREEMENT

BETWEEN
THE
CITY
OF

MILPITAS
AND
THE
SANTA
CLARA
VALLEY

TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY
FOR
2010

MEASURE
B

VEHICLE

REGISTRATION
FEE

COUNTYWIDE

PROGRAM
This
Agreement
(“Funding
Agreement”)
between
the
City
of
Milpitas,
aCalifornia
municipal
corporation,
(“GRANTEE”),
and
the
SANTA
CLARA
VALLEY

TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY,
apublic
agency,
(“VTA”)
is
made
as
of
the
date
of
final
execution
by
each
party
hereto.

RECITALS
A.

Whereas,
in
November
of
2010,
the
voters
of
Santa
Clara
County
authorized
a
TEN
DOLLAR
($10)
increase
in
the
Vehicle
Registration
Fee
(“VRF”),
referred
to
hereinafter
as
the
“PROGRAM,”
for
transportation-related
projects
and
adopted
an
expenditure
plan
which
allocates
the
revenue
to
transportation-related
programs
and
projects
that
have
a
relationship
or
benefit
to
the
persons
who
pay
the
fee;
and
B.

Whereas,
the
VTA
Board
of
Directors
has
adopted
administrative
procedures
for
the
PROGRAM;
and
C.

Whereas,
these
administrative
procedures
state
that
VTA
will
execute
program
funding
agreements
with
project
grantees;
and
D.

Whereas,
the

PROGRAM
includes
a
“Countywide
Program”
that
includes
Intelligent
Transportation
System
(ITS)
technologies
as
an
eligible
project
category;
and
E.

Whereas,
on
August
4,
2016,
the
VTA
Board
approved
VRF
ITS
funds
for
the
Multi-
jurisdictional
Transportation
Technology
project
(“PROJECT”);
and
F.

Whereas,
each
party
hereto
(“Party”)
desires
to
specify
the
terms
and
conditions
under
which

VRF-ITS
project
grants
are
conducted
and
financed.

NOW,

THEREFORE,
in
consideration
of
the
mutual
promises
contained
herein,
each
Party
(collectively
referred
to
as
the
“Parties”)
agrees
as
follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Grant
of
VRF
Funds.

VTA
hereby
agrees
to
allocate
to

GRANTEE,
agrant
(“Grant”)
in
an
amount
not
to
exceed
ONE

HUNDRED
TWENTY

THOUSAND

DOLLARS
$120,000
(“Maximum
Grant
Amount”).

Said
grant
is
provided
to

GRANTEE
in
return
for
GRANTEE’s
agreement
to
implement
the
PROJECT.

Grant
Funds
may
only
be
used
in
the

PROJECT
area
as
shown
on
Exhibit
A
attached
hereto
and
incorporated
by
reference
herein.

The
use
of

PROJECT
funds
is
for
procurement
and
implementation
of
traffic
signal
controller
cabinets,
controllers
and
back-up
battery
systems
for
the
City’s
traffic
signals
to
support
multi-modal
operations
on
the
Tasman
Drive
(between
1-880
and
McCarthy
Boulevard)
corridor,
including
the
City’s
staff
support
that
should
not
exceed
10%
from

MaximumGrantAmount.ApprovedPROJECTelementsandcostsareshownonTable1of ExhibitAattachedheretoandincorporatedbyreference.

2.Term.ThetermofthisFundingAgreementshallcommenceontheEffectiveDate(as definedasthelastexecutiondateinthesignatureblockbelow)andshallcontinueuntilthe earlierof:(i)thedatethattheProjectiscompletedorterminated;or(ii)5:00pm(Pacific Time)onDecember31,2024.

3.InvoicingandPayment.
a.GrantorshallsubmitinvoicesatquarterlyintervalstoVTAforreimbursementofeligible costsincurredtoimplementthePROJECT.GRANTEEshallincludeauditableback-up documentation(timesheets,bills,etc.)witheachinvoice.
b.VTAshallreimburseGRANTEE’sPROJECTeligiblecostsuptotheMaximumGrant Amount.VTAwillallocatetoGRANTEEtheVRFfundsonlyonacostreimbursement basisandonlyfordocumentedeligiblecostsofthePROJECT.GRANTEEagreesthat VRF-ITSfundswillbeutilizedonlyafterGRANTEEexhauststhePROJECT’Sother existingfundingallocation.
c.VTAshall,withintwenty(20)daysafterreceiptofaninvoicethatconformstothe requirementssetforthinthisFundingAgreement,reimburseGRANTEEforalleligible expendituresnotreimbursedbyotherProjectfundinguptotheMaximumGrantAmount. d.GRANTEEshallsubmitbi-annualreportsofGRANTEE’SexpendituresofPROGRAM fundsandassociatedinterest,inaformtobeprovidedbyVTAtoGRANTEE.Each reportwillprovidePROJECTstatustodateandastatusupdateforuncompletedtasks.

ReportsareduefromRECIPIENTtoVTAnolaterthanApril15andOctober15ofeach yearasaconditionofreceivingfunds.GRANTEEshouldincludephotographsto documentworkperformedasappropriateandrequestedbyVTA.

4.NamingofProjectLiaison.PriortoexecutionofthisFundingAgreement,GRANTEEshall notifyVTAofthenameoftheGRANTEE’sPROJECTliaison(the“Liaison”)andofthe Liaison’saddress,telephonenumberandemailaddress.TheLiaisonshallbetheliaisonto VTApertainingtoimplementationofthisFundingAgreementandshallbethecontactfor informationaboutthePROJECT.GRANTEEshallnotifyVTAinwritingofanychangeof LiaisonoroftheLiaison’scontactinformation.Wherepossible,suchnotificationshallbe deliverednolaterthanthirty(30)dayspriortothedateofanychange.

5.MaintenanceofRecords.GRANTEEshallmaintainPROJECTfinancialrecords,books, documents,papers,accountingrecordsandotherevidencepertainingtocostsforfive(5) yearsafterthePROJECT’scompletion.GRANTEEshallmakesuchrecordsavailableto VTAuponrequestforreviewandauditpurposes.Financialauditswillbeperformedat VTA’sdiscretion.VTAwillnotifyGRANTEEinwritinginadvanceofanyauditorother PROJECTreview.

6.CreditofFundingContribution.GRANTEEshallincludeareferencetoVTA’sfunding contributiononallsignage,electronicorprintedmaterialsrelatedtotheProjectthatare distributedtothepublic.VTAshallprovideacopyofVTAlogostoGRANTEEforusein complyingwiththerequirementofthisprovision.

7.Indemnities.
a.NeitherVTAnoranyofficeroremployeethereofshallberesponsibleforanydamageor liabilityoccurringbyreasonofanythingdoneoromittedtobedonebyGRANTEEunder orinconnectionwithanywork,authorityorjurisdictiondelegatedtoVTAorGRANTEE underthisFundingAgreement.BothPartiesagreethatpursuanttoGovernmentCode 895.4,GRANTEEshallfullydefend,indemnify,andsaveharmlessVTAfromallsuits oractionsofeveryname,kindanddescriptionbroughtonfororonaccountofinjury(as definedinGovernmentCodeSection810.8)occurringbyreasonofanythingdoneor omittedtobedonebyGRANTEEunderorinconnectionwithanywork,authorityor jurisdictiondelegatedtoGRANTEEunderthisFundingAgreement.Thisprovisionshall survivetheterminationofthisFundingAgreement.
b.NeitherGRANTEEnoranyofficeroremployeethereofshallberesponsibleforany damageorliabilityoccurringbyreasonofanythingdoneoromittedtobedonebyVTA underorinconnectionwithanywork,authorityorjurisdictiondelegatedtoGRANTEE orVTAunderthisFundingAgreement.BothPartiesagreethatpursuanttoGovernment Code895.4,VTAshallfullydefend,indemnify,andsaveharmlessGRANTEEfromall suitsoractionsofeveryname,kindanddescriptionbroughtonfororonaccountof injury(asdefinedinGovernmentCodeSection810.8)occurringbyreasonofanything doneoromittedtobedonebyVTAunderorinconnectionwithanywork,authorityor jurisdictiondelegatedtoVTAunderthisFundingAgreement.Thisprovisionshall survivetheterminationofthisFundingAgreement.

8.ChangestoTermsofAgreement.Noamendment,alterationorvariationofthetermsof thisFundingAgreementshallbevalidunlessmadeinwritingandsignedbybothofthe partiesheretoandnooralunderstandingoragreementnotincorporatedhereinshallbe bindingonanyofthepartieshereto.

9.EntireAgreement.ThisFundingAgreementrepresentsthefullandcompleteunderstanding ofthePartieswithrespecttothePROJECT.Anypriororcontemporaneousoralorwritten agreementsbyandbetweenthePartiesortheiragentsandrepresentativeswithrespecttothe subjectmatterofthisFundingAgreementarerevokedandextinguishedhereby.

10.Assignment.GRANTEEshallnotassignthisFundingAgreementwithoutthepriorwritten authorizationoftheVTA.Anyassignmentmadeintheabsenceofsuchauthorizationshall bedeemedvoidabinitioandwithoutlegaleffect.

11.BindingonSuccessorsandAssigns.ThisFundingAgreementshallbebindinguponeach Partyandanyofitssuccessorsand/orpermittedassigns.

12.Notices.EachPartyshallgiveanynoticewhichmayberequiredunderthisFunding Agreementinwriting.Suchnoticeshallbeeffectivewhenreceived,andshallbegivenby personalservice,bytheU.S.PostalServiceorbycertifiedmail,totheaddressessetforth below,ortosuchaddresseswhichmaybespecifiedinwritingbythePartieshereto.

ToVTAToGRANTEE:

DeborahDagangChristianDiRenzo
DirectorofPlanning&ProgramDevelopmentDirectorofPublicWorks SantaClaraValleyTransportationAuthorityCityofMilpitas
3331North1stStreet1265NorthMilpitasBlvd
BuildingB2Milpitas,CA95035
SanJosé,CA95134

13.SignatureAuthority.EachPartytothisFundingAgreementrepresentsandwarrantsthat eachpersonwhosesignatureappearshereonhasbeendulyauthorizedandhasthefull authoritytoexecutethisFundingAgreementonitsbehalf.

14.StrictPerformance.ThefailureofeitherPartytoinsistuponthestrictperformanceofany oftheterms,covenantsandconditionsofthisFundingAgreementshallnotbedeemeda waiverofanyrightorremedythateitherPartymayhaveandshallnotbedeemedawaiverof theirrighttorequirestrictperformanceofalloftheterms,covenants,andconditions thereafter.

15.DisputeResolution.IfaquestionarisesregardinginterpretationofthisFundingAgreement oritsperformance,ortheallegedfailureofaPartytoperform,thePartyraisingthequestion ormakingtheallegationshallgivewrittennoticethereoftotheotherParty.ThePartiesshall promptlymeetinanefforttoresolvetheissuesraised.IfthePartiesfailtoresolvetheissues raised,alternativeformsofdisputeresolution,includingmediation,maybepursuedby mutualagreement.ItistheintentofthePartiestotheextentpossiblethatlitigationbe avoidedasamethodofdisputeresolution.

16.ChoiceofLaw;Venue.ThisFundingAgreementshallbeconstrued,anditsperformance enforcedunderCalifornialaw.IntheeventthatsuitshallbebroughtbyeitherPartytothis FundingAgreement,thePartiesagreethatvenueshallbeexclusivelyvestedintheState courtsoftheCountyofSantaClaraor,iffederaljurisdictionisappropriate,exclusivelyinthe UnitedStatesDistrictCourtfortheNorthernDistrictofCalifornia,inSanJosé,California.

17.InterpretationofthisFundingAgreement.ThePartiesheretoacknowledgeandagreethat, althoughthisFundingAgreementwasoriginallydraftedbyVTA’slegalcounsel,GRANTEE anditslegalcounselhavereviewedandnegotiatedthetermsofthisFundingAgreementwith theVTA.Consequently,thedoctrinethatambiguitiesinanagreementshouldberesolved againstthedraftingpartyshallnotbeemployedinconnectionwiththisFundingAgreement, whichshallbeinterpretedinaccordancewithitsfairmeaning.

18.Counterparts.ThisFundingAgreementmaybeexecutedinoneormorecounterparts,allof whichtakentogethershallconstituteoneandthesameinstrument.

SignaturesofPartiesonfollowingpage.

INWITNESSWBEREOF,thePartieshaveexecutedthisAgreementasofthedate shownbelow:

CITYOFMILPITASSANTACLARAVALLEY
(GRANTEE)TRANSPORTATIONAUTHORITY(VTA)
CityManagerCarolynM.Gonot,GeneralManager/CEO
Date:
_________________
Date:
_________________
ApprovedastoForm:ApprovedastoForm:

CityAttorneyEdMoran,VTASrAssistantCounsel
6

VTARecommendationforProjectApprovaJMemo
V
ValLey
Transportation
Authority

MEMORANDUM
Writer’sDirectTelephone:(408)321-5892
TO:CitiesofMilpitas,SanJose,SantaClara,Sunnyvale,andCountyofSanta Clara(VRF-ITSStakeholders)
FROM:DavidKobayashi,SeniorTransportationEngineer
DATE:April5,2021
SUBJECT:ProposedProjectforThirdCycleofVRF-ITSFunding
Theproposalforthe3rdcycleofVRF-ITSfundingfortheVRF-ITSStakeholders’consideration istodeployandimplementamulti-jurisdictionaltransportationtechnologyprojectonamulti- modalcorridorofregionalsignificance.Thisdocumentprovidesdetailsabouttheproposed project.

Where?
TheproposedprojectlocationisalongtheGreatMallParkway-TasmanDrive,FairOaksAvenue, andJavaDrivecorridorsasdepictedinFigure1bytheorangelinebetween1-880inMilpitasand MathildaAvenueinSunnyvale(limitsaredepictedbytheredbars).

Figure1—ProjectAreaMapandLimits
/
IOI_I
II
00 0
0 000
a
II
00 oVTALightRailStations-OrangeUne
—ProjectUmlts
.

VTAlightRail-OrangeLine
•SpurIntersections
.::

SignalizedIntersections
N
oO.250O.flt1.5.
—N4’.(d*N6Oe&C.a..,djCA.gd!
7

TheproposedprojectalsoincludesaspuralongtheNorthFirstStreetcorridorincludingthree intersectionsatN.FirstStreetlOrchardParkway,N.FirstStreet/MontagueExpressway,andN.

FirstStreet/RiverOaksParkway.TheN.FirstStreetspurisacongestedcorridorwiththe MontagueExpressway/N.FirstStreetintersectionbeingaIinchpinthataffectstheExpressway, N.FirstStreet(thecrossstreet,andlightrailoperationsonthecrossstreet.VTA,CityofSan Jose,andtheCountyofSantaClarahaveworkedovernumerousyearsatthislocationtobalance operationsforallmodesandthecurrentprojectwillhelpaddressthesechallenges.

Why?
Theproposedcorridorbetween1-880andMathildaAvenueandN.FirstStreetisamultimodal corridorofregionalsignificanceforamultitudeofreasonsasdescribedbelow.

Ma/orCommuterRoutes
ThecorridorisbothanAMandPMcommuteroutesofregionalsignificanceforthefollowing reasons:
•Connectsmultiplelocalagenciesincludingfourcities(Milpitas,SanJose,SantaClara, andSunnyvale)andtheCountyofSantaClara
•Servesresidentswithinthecountyprovidingaccesstolargeresidentialareasonthe easternend(citiesofMilpitasandSanJose)andtoaccesslargeemploymentcentersoff thecorridoralongN.FirstStreet,GreatAmericaParkwayandMoffettParkonthe westernend(citiesofSanJose,SantaClaraandSunnyvale)
•ServescommutersexternaltoSantaClaraCountyfromAlamedaCountyandbeyond whouse1-880and1-680viaTasmanRoadandMontagueExpresswaytoaccessthis corridor
•ServesmajoreventcentersincludingtheLevi’sStadiumandSantaClaraConvention Center
Thecongestiononthecorridorishighlydirectionaldependingonthepeakperiods.The westboundandnorthbounddirectionsaretheprimarycommutedirectionsduringtheAMpeak periodswhiletheeastboundandsouthbounddirectionsaretheprimarycommutedirections duringthePMpeakperiods.

Ma/orTransitRoute
VTAoperateslightrailonthiscorridorwithfrequentservice(headwaybetweentrainsbeingless than15minutes).Thetransit(lightrail)corridoralsoincludesthetwolightrailstationswithwell over800weekdaypassengers,whicharetheGreatMallStationonthefareasternendand MountainViewonthefarwesternend.Theridershiponthissegmentofthelightrailcorridoris expectedtogrowwiththeconnectiontotheMilpitasBARTstation.

Ma/orBicycleRoute
TheVTABikewaysMapincludesthiscorridoranddesignatesitasabikerouteofregional significance.Approximatelytwothirdsoftheprojectcorridorhavebicyclelanesontheroadway andtheremainingonethirdonwesternendoftheprojecthasmainlysharedroadwayfacilities.

BasedonfieldobservationsandtheStravaHeatMap(awebsiteofaggregatedStrava(aphysical activitytrackingapp)users’dataoverpasttwoyears)showsmoderatetohighuseactivityonthe segmentwithbikelanesandheaviestusageonthesegmentwithmostlysharedroadwayfacilities.

Likethevehiculartraffic,bikecommutersaretravelingbetweenresidencesontheeasternend withintheCityofMilpitasandthelargeemploymentcentersalongN.FirstStreet,GreatAmerica ParkwayandMoffettParkatthewesternendofthecorridor.
8

How?
Thepurposeoftheprojectistodeployandimplementamulti-jurisdictionaltransportation technologyprojectonamulti-modalcorridorofregionalsignificancethatimprovestraffic operationsforallmodes(regularvehicles,transitvehicles,bicycles,andpedestrians).The identificationofthetechnologicalapproachestomeetthepurposeisbasedonavailable informationonexistingtrafficsignalequipmentinthecorridor,andrecentdiscussionswithCity staffontheneeds.Thekeycomponentsoftheprojectareasfollows:
•UpdatingtrafficsignalcontrollersoftwaretomeetorexceedtoVTA’sEnhancedTraffic SignalControllerguidancedocumenttoensureinteroperabilityamongthetrafficsignal controlleroperatorsalongthecorridor,promoteseamlessoperationsacrossjurisdictional lines,andprovideformulti-modalfunctionstoaccommodatetransit,bicycles,and pedestrians.
•Enhancingthelocalagency’strafficmanagementcenter(TMC)softwaretoprovide enhancedperformancemonitoringcapabilitiesandfunctionstosupportthemovementof allmodes.
•Updatingtrafficsignaltimingplanstoimproveflowofvehiculartrafficandtransitonthe corridor.
•Acceleratingthedeploymentofamorereliabledetectiontechnologywithgreater flexibilityintheplacementofthedetectionzonetotriggerservicecallsfortransitsignal priority(TSP).Thereliabilityofthisdetectionhasbeenasourceofdelaytoboth commutersandtransit.TheprojectwillalsoincludeTSPinterconnectionequipment betweentwodifferentlocalagenciesoperatingdifferenttrafficsignalsystemsand upgradingagingTSPinterconnectionequipmentwhicharenolongermanufactured.

TheproposalandcostaresummarizedinTable1andshowsthequantitiesofeachabove- describedelement.Theall-inclusivecost(e.g.,materials,construction,agencylabor,and contingency)is$1.5million.

When?
IftheVRF-ITSStakeholdershavenoobjectionstothisproposal,thenextstepsmayrequireVTA stafftotaketheproposalthroughtheBoardofDirectors,VTAstaffestimatesthatthedurationof theprojectwouldbeapproximately18to24months.Theestimateddurationassumestoexecute theneededfundingagreementswithinsixmonthsorless.
9

Table1-ProposedVRFProjectElements&Costs
No.ofCostper
ProjectElementUnitsUnitCost
Software(Firmware)ControllerUpgrades
COUNTYOFSANTACLARAI$5,000$5,000
MILPITAS4$5,000$20,000
SANJOSE0$5,000$-
SANTACLARA7$5,000$35,000
SUNNYVALE10$5,000$50,000
FirmwareUpgrades-Subtotal:12NA.$110,000
TrafficManagementCenterUpgrades
COUNTYOFSANTACLARA1$50,000$50,000
MILPITAS1$50,000$50,000
SANJOSE1$50,000$50,000
SANTACLARA1$50,000$50,000
SUNNYVALE1$50,000$50,000
TrafficManagementCenterUpgrades-Subtotal:4NA.$250,000
AccelerateTSPDetectionUpgradesEquipmentInstall
COUNTYOFSANTACLARA2$15,000.00$30,000
MILPITAS4$15,000.00$60,000
SANJOSE11$15,000.00$165,000
SANTACLARA7$15,000.00$105,000
AccelerateTSPDetectionUpgradesEquipmentInstall-Subtotal:24NA.$360,000 TSPControllerParameter&TimingUpdates
COUNTYOFSANTACLARA1$9,000.00$9,000
MILPITAS4$9,000.00$36,000
SANJOSE9$9,000.00$81,000
SANTACLARA7$9,000.00$63,000
SUNNYVALE10$9,000.00$90,000
TSPControllerParameter&TimingUpdates-Subtotal:21NA.$279,000 Subtotal:$999,000
AgencyProjectAdmin(10%ofSubtotal):s99,9oo
VTAProjectAdmin(10%Subtotal):$99,900
20%Contingency:$301,200
TotalCost:$1,500,000
10

City of Milpitas, California

BUDGET CHANGE FORM
From (Credit) To (Debit)
Type of Change
Account Amount Account Amount
Check one:
Budget
Appropriation
Budget Transfer
221-3852
331-951-3440-7-4800
331-951-3440-15-3575
$120,000
$120,000
$120,000
331-9513440153932
221-2909
331-951-3440-7-4800
$120,000
$120,000
$120,000
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a funding agreement between the City of Milpitas and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority for grant funds from the 2010 Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee Countywide Program in an amount not to exceed $120,000.

BACKGROUND:

Senate Bill 83 (Hancock), signed into law in 2009, authorized countywide transportation agencies such as the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to implement a Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) of up to $10 on motor vehicles registered within the county to pay for transportation programs and projects. The legislation requires that the revenue collected is used on programs and projects with a relationship or benefit to the owners of motor vehicles paying the fee. Subsequently, Santa Clara County voters approved a VRF on November 2, 2010 – Measure B.

The adopted VTA Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) expenditure plans allocates funding into three tiers:
•80% - Local Road Improvement and Repair Program
•15% - Countywide Program
•5% - Program Administration
The attached funding agreement is to receive funds from the Countywide Program which sets aside funding for Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Technologies, which includes traffic control signals, safety and traveler information systems.

ANALYSIS:

In 2021, VTA approached the cities of Milpitas, San Jose, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale, as well as the County of Santa Clara to propose a multi-jurisdictional transportation technology project on a corridor which they deemed as “multi-modal” and of “regional significance.”
The project location is along Great Mall Parkway-Tasman Drive, Fair Oaks Avenue, and Java Drive corridors between I- 880 in Milpitas and Mathilda Avenue in Sunnyvale. The project also includes a spur along the North First Street corridor including three intersections at N. First Street/Orchard Parkway, N. First Street/Montague Expressway, and N. First Street/River Oaks Parkway.

A project proposal from VTA to the four cities and County stated that the corridor between I-880 and Mathilda Avenue and N. First Street is a multi-modal corridor of regional significance because:
•There are both morning and afternoon commute routes connecting multiple jurisdictions. •Provides access to large residential areas and employment centers located along the corridor. •VTA operates light rail with frequent service, including at the Great Mall Station which is expected to grow in significance due to its connection to the Milpitas BART station; and •The VTA Bikeways Map designates a bike route of regional significance along this corridor. Approximately 2/3 of the project corridor has bicycle lanes on the roadway.

In Milpitas, the City will purchase traffic signals controller cabinets, controllers and back-up battery systems for City traffic signals. This equipment will support multi-modal operations on Tasman Drive (between I-880 and McCarthy Boulevard) corridor. In addition, it will allow the City to update traffic controller software to ensure interoperability among the traffic signal controller operators along the corridor, promote seamless operations across jurisdictional lines, and provide for multi-modal functions to accommodate transit, bicycles, and pedestrians Each of the jurisdictions participating in this project would receive a commensurate portion of the project funds based on the projected costs of the equipment and implementation costs. The City has gathered equipment cost estimates and further negotiated with VTA to mutually agree on a project award of up to $120,000. This amount also includes a 10% administration fee which will be valuable to support the oversight and administration of this project.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Alternative 1: Do not enter into a funding agreement with VTA for VRF Countywide Program Funds.

Pros: None identified.

Cons: It will not be possible to complete this project along the identified project corridor, as a significant portion of the project is within the City limits, including a light rail connection near the Milpitas BART station.

Reason for Not Recommending: The City will lose the opportunity to use voter-approved VRF fees that are earmarked for transportation projects benefiting the owners of motor vehicles that are paying this fee.

FISCAL IMPACT:

As discussed, the City will receive up to $120,000 (on a reimbursement basis) for the purchase and implementation of traffic signals controller cabinets, controllers and back-up battery systems for City traffic signals to support multi-modal operations on Tasman Drive (between I-880 and McCarthy Boulevard) corridor, including 10% to support the City’s administration of the project. The Public Works Director will serve as the project liaison for the term of the agreement which will be in effect until the completion of the project or December 31, 2024. The monies will be appropriated in CIP 3440 Annual Street Light, Signal, and Signage project.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

The project entails the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use and is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15301.

RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize the City Manager to enter into a funding agreement between the City of Milpitas and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority for grant funds from the 2010 Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee Countywide Program in an amount not to exceed $120,000.

ATTACHMENT(S):
(a) Resolution
(b) Funding Agreement
(c) VTA Recommendation for Project Approval Memo
(d) Budget Change Form
Check if City Council Approval required. Meeting: November 7, 2023 Requested by: Department Head: Christian Di Renzo Date: November 7, 2023 Reviewed by: Finance Director: Lauren Lai Date: November 7, 2023 Approved by: City Manager: Ned Thomas Date: November 7, 2023 Date approved by City Council, if required: Confirmed by:

FI/24786/V Form 30-222 (Rev. 1/92)

CITY OF MILPITAS

AGENDA REPORT
(AR)
Item Title: Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Third Amendment to the Agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District for Water Conservation Program Cost Sharing and to Execute and Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Our City Forest to administer the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program (Staff Contact: Christian Di Renzo, Public Works Director, 408-586-2602; and Elaine Marshall, Deputy Public Works Director, 408-586-2603)
Category: Community Services and Sustainable Infrastructure Meeting Date: 11/7/2023
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to Execute (1) Third Amendment to the Agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District for Water Conservation Program Cost Sharing to extend term by an additional year and increase Valley Water cost share payment to City for Lawn Bust Milpitas for additional not to exceed of $40,000; and (2) Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Our City Forest to administer the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program to implement program for an additional year at a cost not to exceed $120,000.

BACKGROUND:

Prior to last winter, California experienced three dry years in a row, which prompted state and local water regulators to call for water conservation measures. However, California’s water and snowpack conditions have vastly improved due to significant rainfall and storms between December 2022 to March 2023. The improved water supply has resulted in the State, local water regulators, and agencies to ease existing drought restrictions. On May 16, 2023, the Milpitas City Council approved a resolution to terminate the Water Shortage Level 2 Drought Emergency and its associated water use restrictions. Adoption of the resolution allowed the City to ease drought restrictions in alignment with the State and the City’s wholesale water suppliers’ actions, while continuing to promote Water Conservation as a Milpitas Way of Life. Although water use reduction targets are not currently required by the State or the City’s wholesale water suppliers, Milpitas still provides educational resources and programs to encourage water use efficiency as water conditions can change.

Investments in water conservation now make water supply more resilient and can ease future water shortages.

To encourage water conservation practices among residents and businesses, the City offers several forms of education, outreach, and incentive programs. On June 16, 2015, the City Council approved an ongoing Water Conservation Program through Capital Improvement Program (CIP) #7126. The program provides funding for ongoing water conservation public outreach and education, water-efficient and sustainable landscape classes and workshops, a customer portal to explore water use, and cost-sharing in Valley Water’s landscape and rainwater harvesting programs that increase the eligible rebate amount for Milpitas participants.

Valley Water has been offering a robust portfolio of water conservation programs for decades and has offered local water retailers and cities the opportunity to increase the incentives for their customers through “cost- sharing.” This approach is operationally efficient in that it gives local agencies the flexibility to offer additional increased financial incentives without the burden of administering local programs themselves.

The City and Valley Water initially entered into a Cost Sharing Agreement to share in the costs for various water conservation programs and increase financial rebates for Milpitas participants on July 1, 2021. On October 19, 2021, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute an amendment to the City’s agreement with Valley Water that expanded the Milpitas and Valley Water partnership that included increasing the City’s cost-sharing amounts for water efficiency rebates, facilitating rebates from Valley Water for the City’s Advanced Metering Infrastructure and Water Use Reports Program, and enabling Valley Water’s financial cost share and funding contribution toward the City’s Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program. This agreement was

subsequently amended again to correct an oversight in the First Amendment and clarify invoicing and billing terms.

Expanded Cost Share Rebate Amounts
Program Valley Water Rebate Expanded Milpitas
Match
(City pays to Valley
Water and passed
through to participant)
Total Rebate for
Milpitas Participant
Landscape Conversion $2 per sq ft as of July 1,
2021
+ $2 per sq ft $4 per sq ft
Rain Barrel $35 per rain barrel + $35 per rain barrel $70 per rain barrel Rain Garden $1 per sq ft + $1 per sq ft $ 2 per sq ft
Graywater Laundry-to-
Landscape
Up to $200 per system + up to $200 per system Up to $400 per system Through the Cost Share Agreement Valley Water provides funding to the City for other Milpitas specific initiatives:
•Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot – Valley Water pays City $2 per sq ft of landscape converted by Our City Forest with a not to exceed of $40,000;
•Advanced Metering Infrastructure implementation – Valley Water pays City $10 per year for seven years for each qualifying AMI meter connection with an annual not to exceed of $165,000; and •Home Water Use Reports – Valley Water pays City to send Home Water Use Reports at a rate of $2.25 per connection with an annual cap of $25,000.

ANALYSIS:

Third Amendment to Valley Water Cost Share Agreement
Since the implementation of the cost sharing agreement, Milpitas residents have continued to express their interest in and show support for sustainable and water-efficient landscapes and practices by attending the City’s landscape education classes and participating in the Landscape Rebate Programs. Since 2019, Milpitas residents have shown an increased interest in landscape conversion projects and rainwater harvesting systems. Graywater system rebates have historically been the least popular of the water conservation programs for various reasons including cost of system, need to change type of laundry detergent used, and other operational factors. Based on this feedback and low interest, staff have not recommended further increasing the rebates for graywater systems.

Landscape Rebate Program Participation for Cost Sharing Programs Program Total Rebates
FY 19-20
Total Rebates
FY 20-21
Total Rebates
FY 21-22
Total Rebates
FY 22-23
Landscape
Conversion
2 1,325 sq.ft. converted
11 10,727 sq.ft. converted
16 15,105 sq.ft. converted
26 48,469 sq.ft. converted
Rain Barrel 3 0 10 30
Rain Garden* 0 2 (1,097 sq.ft.) 1 (273 sq.ft.) 1 (635 sq.ft.) Graywater
Laundry-to-
Landscape
0 0 0 1
Total Rebates 186 61 45 644
Staff’s recommending a Third Amendment to the Cost Sharing Agreement to allow for Valley Water to continue its contribution to the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program for an additional term for an additional amount of up to

$40,000. Additionally, City and Valley Water staff have identified the need to extend the overall term of the Cost Share Agreement for an additional year (through June 30, 2029). Under the original Cost Share agreement terms, Valley Water would reimburse the City $10 per year for seven years of each qualifying AMI meter connection with an annual not to exceed of $165,000. Due to a delay in completing the conversions, the City was not able to issue its first invoice to Valley Water until 2022, one year after the agreement was executed. In order to be able to invoice and receive all seven annual payments for AMI implementation, the overall term of the agreement needs to be extended for an additional year from June 30, 2028 to June 30, 2029. There is no additional costs associated with this term extension.

Our City Forest Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program Extension Interest in outdoor water savings can also be gauged by looking to the performance of the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program. During Year 1 of the program, 73 Milpitas residents submitted an interest form, with 96% of applicants stating that water conservation was an important motivator for participating in the program.

Between March 2022 and June 2023, Our City Forest’s team successfully completed 20 lawn conversion projects across the City. An estimated 18,313 square feet of turf was removed and replaced with native and low water-use plants and mulch. By removing the turf at the completed project sites, an estimated 567,703 gallons of water will be saved annually.

Following the successful completion of the Phase 1 of the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program, City staff have been working with Our City Forest to discuss continuation of the program. Staff are recommending an amendment to the professional services agreement between the City and Our City Forest to enable the continuation of the program. Under the proposed amendment, Our City Forest will continue to administer the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot through February 2025 and will convert up to 20,000 square feet of high-water using turf to drought-tolerant plants by replacing the lawns at up to 20 single-family homes. The extended pilot program will be available on an application basis to any interested single-family homeowner in Milpitas, though priority for the first 10 spots will be given to residents that are either: low-income, a US Veteran, a person with a disability, or a senior citizen (age 60+).

For Phase 2 program, Our City Forest will continue to administer the program and provide approved participants with the following services:
•Tailored landscape design featuring native, drought-friendly alternate landscape •Covering of the existing lawn and vegetation utilizing sheet mulching and capping off existing irrigation systems
•Installation of drought-tolerant garden per approved design and instructions for ongoing maintenance, including hand watering
Participants in the pilot program will have the option to choose between three landscape design packages and will pay a good faith deposit amount based on the package chosen:
•Basic Package: $100 deposit, includes replacing the lawn with hardy perennials. •Urban Forest Garden: $250 deposit, incorporates trees and flowering shrubs. •Premium Oasis: $500 deposit, incorporates a customized design consisting of trees and flowering shrubs.

Under this program, Our City Forest will not be installing a new irrigation system due to long-term maintenance liability and homeowners will be provided with instructions for proper ongoing hand watering. Homeowners who want to include a new irrigation system in their project will need to pay for the additional service separately or can choose to participate in the traditional Lawn Conversion Rebate Program, where they can hire their own landscape professional or complete the project on their own.

Our City Forest has proposed an overall program cost of $6 per square foot of converted lawn, for a total cost of $120,000. Valley Water has again agreed to pay its share of the lawn conversion rebate amount directly to the City to offset direct program costs. This would eliminate the need for the program participant to go through

the process of paying for part of the conversion costs to Our City Forest and then applying for a rebate through Valley Water. Valley Water will contribute $2 per square foot of turf converted by the Lawn Bust Milpitas program, for an additional not to exceed amount of $40,000 for Phase 2.

POLICY ALTERNATIVE(S):

Alternative 1: City Council does not approve of the recommended agreement amendments.

Pros: City would have cost savings by not spending funds on this program.

Cons: City would not provide additional services to help residents save water. The City would receive one less year of reimbursement from Valley Water for AMI meters with reduction in rebate revenue to the City of $165,000.

Reason for Not Recommending: This alternative is not recommended because expanding the Water Conservation Program will help the City continue to promote Water Conservation as a Milpitas Way of Life and reduce water use during drought periods and non-drought times and offset City costs for water conservation programs.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The estimated not-to-exceed City cost for continuing the pilot will not exceed $120,000; up to $40,000 to be reimbursed by Valley Water. The funding source of CIP 7126 is from Park, Water Capital Surcharge, and Water Fund. As of 10/25/2023, the balance in CIP 7126 is $388,644.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):

The project entails the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use and is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15301.

RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize the City Manager to Execute (1) Third Amendment to the Agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District for Water Conservation Program Cost Sharing to extend term by an additional year and increase Valley Water cost share for Lawn Bust Milpitas for additional $40,000; and (2) Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Our City Forest to administer the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program to implement program for an additional year at a cost not to exceed $120,000.

Attachment(s):

1. Executed Agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District and the City of Milpitas for Water Conservation Programs and First and Second Amendments

3. Third Amendment to Agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District and the City of Milpitas for Water Conservation Programs

4. Professional Services Agreement with Our City Forest to administer the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program

5. First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Our City Forest to administer the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program.

DocuSignEnvelopeID:0861C9C2-3687-4AA4-8A5E-5E94950D0230

AGREEMENT

BETWEENTHESANTACLARAVALLEYWATERDISTRICTAND

THECITYOFMILPITASFORWATERCONSERVATIONPROGRAMS
ThisAgreement(AGREEMENT),effectiveasofJuly1,2021,(EFFECTIVEDATE)betweentheSantaClara ValleyWaterDistrict,aspecialdistrictcreatedbytheCaliforniaLegislature(hereinafterreferredtoasVALLEY WATER)andtheCityofMilpitas,amunicipalcorporation(hereinafterreferredtoasMILPITAS)setsforththe respectiverolesofVALLEYWATERandMILPITASinregardtoWATERCONSERVATIONPROGRAMS (hereinafterreferredtoasPROGRAMS).VALLEYWATERandMILPITASmaybereferredtointhis AGREEMENTindividuallyasa“Party”orcollectivelyasthe‘Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREASthePROGRAMSinvolveprovidinglandscaperebates,advancedmeteringinfrastructure(AMI)and waterusereportsforpropertieslocatedwithinMILPITAS’servicearea;and WHEREAS,thePROGRAMSareconsistentwithVALLEYWATER’sandMILPITAS’UrbanWater ManagementPlanningActrequirements;and
WHEREASthePROGRAM’Sgoalistosavewaterandprovideinformationonhowtousewatermostefficiently; and
WHEREASMILPITASwishestoadministeranAdvancedMeteringInfrastructure(AMI)ProgramandWaterUse ReportsProgram;and
WHEREASVALLEYWATERwishestoadministeraLandscapeRebateProgram;and WHEREASbothPartieswishtocostsharewitheachotheronthesePROGRAMS.

NOW,THEREFORE,inconsiderationoftherecitalsandmutualobligationsofthepartiesexpressedinthis Agreement,VALLEYWATERandMILPITASagreeasfollows:

1.MILPITAS’RESPONSIBILITIES
a.AdministrationoftheAMIsystemandWaterUseReportsProgram. b.Collectionandanalysisofdatatodeterminewatersavings.
c.AdministrationofallfundsfortheHomeWaterUseReportsProgram. d.ProvideVALLEYWATERwithwaterusagerecordsandotherdatanecessarytodeterminesavingsand costeffectivenessoftheHomeWaterUseReportsProgram.Thisincludesnumberofhomewateruse reportssentbymonth.Waterusagerecordsforindividualaccountswillonlybemadeavailableto VALLEYWATERforthoseaccountholderswhohaveauthorizedVALLEYWATERtoobtainthe informationfromMILPITAS.
e.InvoiceVALLEYWATER,onabi-annualbasis,forfiftypercentofthecontractcost(netanygrantfunding receivedbyMILPITAS)forMILPITAStosendhomewaterusereportstoMILPITASresidents,upto $2.25perconnection.MILPITASshallnotinvoiceVALLEYWATERforanyamountsexceedingthe $25,000annualcapsetforthinSection2.e.below.Onlycostspaiddirectlytohomewaterusereports vendorshallbeincludedinthebi-annualinvoice.
f.InvoiceVALLEYWATER,onabi-annualbasis,$10foreachAMIwaterconnectionmeetingallofthe followingcriteria:
1)AMImeterhasbeenincludedinthisAGREEMENTforsevenyearsorless; 2)AMImeterisscheduledtobereadaminimumofonceperhour;
3)AMIcustomerisprovidedaccesstoanonlinewaterusageportal; 4)Leakalertsareissuedtocustomerseitherviatheportalorviaothermeans.Leakalertsettingsfor continuousleaksmustnotexceedfivegallonsperhourforsingle-familyresidentialaccountswitha AgreementBetweenValleyWaterandMILPITASforWaterConservationPrograms,FY221

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B61C9C2-3687-4AA4-8A5E-5E94950D0230 duration not to exceed 72 hours; and duration of burst leaks is not to exceed 8 hours. For other meter classes, continuous volumes can be set by the utility with leak notifications within 72 hours. g. Provide VALLEY WATER bi-annual with information on the number of leak alerts sent, estimated leak volumes and duration, and estimated water savings associated with leak alerts for each month. h. MILPITAS must pay VALLEY WATER as set forth below for each activity performed by VALLEY WATER in the MILPITAS service area:
1) Provide up to $1.00 per each square foot of turf and/or pool removed per qualified residential rebate, up to $1,000 per residential site, as per VALLEY WATER’S Landscape Rebate Program requirements.
2) Provide up to $15.00 per 40-99 gallon rain barrel, $0.50 per gallon for 100+ gallon cistern tanks, $1.00 per each square foot of roof area diverted to designate rain garden areas, up to $300 to VALLEY WATER per subsection 2.d. below. The Rainwater Capture rebate total cap being $1 000 per residential site as per VALLEY WATER’S PROGRAM requirements below. i. Work cooperatively with VALLEY WATER in appropriately advertising the PROGRAMS to targeted customers.
j. Creation and distribution of outreach materials encouraging customer enrollment in leak alerts and active portal engagement.
k. Make payment to VALLEY WATER within thirty (30) days of receipt of a bi-annual invoice from VALLEY WATER. When submitting an invoice, VALLEY WATER shall provide PROGRAM participation information. MILPITAS’ total payments to VALLEY WATER shall not exceed $40,000 annually.

2. VALLEY WATER’S RESPONSIBILITIES
a, Administration of Landscape Rebate Program (LRP) funds including, but not limited to, 1) Processing the payment of the amounts set forth in Section 1 .h. above, to eligible persons residing in MILPITAS (ELIGIBLE RESIDENTS”). This supplemental rebate amount shall be in addition to the customary amounts paid by VALLEY WATER.
2) Payment of standard Landscape Rebate Program amounts to ELIGIBLE RESIDENTS within 8-12 weeks of approval of MILPITAS’ residential applicant’s request. b. Collection and analysis of data to determine Landscape Rebate Program water savings. c. Administration of all funds for Landscape Rebate Program. d. Invoicing MILPITAS, on a bi-annual basis, for the Landscape Rebate Program. VALLEY WATER shall not invoice MILPITAS for any amounts exceeding the $40,000 cap set forth in Section 1 .k. above. e. Share in the cost of the Home Water Use Reports Program. VALLEY WATER will pay 50 percent of the costs, up to $2.25 per connection. The annual cap for this program is not to exceed $25,000. f. Compensate MILPITAS $10 for each qualifying AMI water connection meeting the specifications in Section 1 .f. above. The annual cap for this program is not to exceed $165,000. g. Make payment to MILPITAS within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from MILPITAS. When submitting an invoice, MILPITAS shall provide a copy of the corresponding Home Water Use Reports Program vendor invoice and program participation information to VALLEY WATER. VALLEY WATER total cost to MILPITAS shall not exceed $190,000 annually or $1,330,000 during the term of the agreement.

3. HOLD HARMLESS AND LIABILITY
a. In lieu of and not withstanding the pro rata risk allocation, which might otherwise be imposed between the PARTIES pursuant to Government Code Section 895.6, the PARTIES agree that all losses or liabilities incurred by a PARTY shall not be shared pro rata but, instead, VALLEY WATER and MILPITAS agree that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, each of the PARTIES hereto shall fully indemnify and hold each of the other PARTIES, their officers, board members, employees, and agents, harmless from any claim, expense or cost, damage or liability imposed for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful Agreement Between Valley Water and MILPITAS for Water Conservation Programs, FY 22 2

DocuSignEnvelopeID:0B61C9C2-3687-4AA4-8A5E-5E94950D0230 misconductoftheindemnifyingPARTY,itsofficers,employeesoragents,underorinconnectionwith orarisingoutofanywork,authorityorobligationdelegatedtosuchPARTYunderthisAGREEMENT.

NoPARTY,noranyofficer,boardmemberoragentthereofshallberesponsibleforanydamageor liabilityoccurringbyreasonofthenegligentactsoromissionsorwillfulmisconductoftheother PARTIEShereto,theirofficers,boardmembers,employees,oragents,underorinconnectionwithor arisingoutofanyworkauthorityorobligationdelegatedtosuchotherPARTIESunderthis AGREEMENT.ThisindemnificationprovisionshallsurviveanyterminationofthisAGREEMENT. b.Therights,duties,andobligationsofthePartiesassetforthaboveinthisSection3.HoldHarmless andLiabilitywillsurvivetermination,suspension,completion,andexpirationofthisAGREEMENT.

4.NOPOWERTOINCURANYDEBT,OBLIGATIONORLIABILITY
Partiesshallhavenopowertoincuranydebt,obligation,orliabilityonbehalfofotherPartyorotherwiseact asanagentoftheotherParty.

5.DOCUMENTREVIEW
VALLEYWATERandMILPITASwill,uponreasonableadvancewrittennotice,makeavailableforinspection totheotherpartyrecords,booksandotherdocumentsrelatingtothePROGRAMS.

6.TERM
ThetermoftheAgreementisfromJuly1,2021toJune30,2028,oruntilfundsaredepleted,whichever occursfirst.ThetermoftheAgreementmaybeextendedbymutualconsentoftheParties.ThisAgreement shallbecontingentuponapprovalofprogramfundingeachfiscalyearbybothVALLEYWATER’sBoardof DirectorsandbytheCityCouncilofMILPITAS.

7.NOTICE
Anynotice,payment,creditorinstrumentrequiredorpermittedtobegivenhereundershallbedeemed receiveduponpersonaldeliveryorfive(5)daysafterdepositinanyUnitedStatesmaildepository,firstclass postageprepaidandaddressedtothepartyforwhomintended.

IftoVALLEYWATER:SantaClaraValleyWaterDistrict
5750AlmadenExpressway
SanJose,CA95118
Attn:ConservationPrograms
IftoMILPITAS:DeputyPublicWorksDirector
CityofMilpitas
1265N.MilpitasBlvd
Milpitas,CA95035
EitherpartymaychangesuchaddressbynoticegiventotheotherpartyasprovidedinthisSection6.

8.INSURANCE
EachPartyshalladheretotheinsurancerequirementsthatarespecifiedinExhibitAofthis AGREEMENT.EitherpartytothisAGREEMENTmaysubmitaletterofself-insurancetosatisfythe insurancerequirementsofExhibitA.

9.ENTIREAGREEMENT
AgreementBetweenvalleyWaterandMILPITASforWaterConservationPrograms,FY223

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B61 C9C2-3687-4/A4-8A5E-5E9495ODO23O This AGREEMENT contains the entire AGREEMENT between VALLEY WATER and MILPITAS relating to the PROGRAMS. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations not expressly set forth in this AGREEMENT are of no force or effect.

10. AMENDMENTS
The Agreement may only be amended by written agreement executed by both parties.

11. ASSIGNMENT
Neither party is allowed to assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any of the rights or interests in this Agreement without the written consent of the other party.

12. WAIVER
A Party’s waiver of any term, condition, covenant, or breach of any term, condition, or covenant shall not be construed as a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant, or breach of any other term, condition, or covenant.

13. SEVERABILITY
The partial or total invalidity of one or more parts of this Agreement will not affect the intent or validity or remaining parts of this Agreement.

14. GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement is a contract under the laws of the State of California and for all purposes must be interpreted in accordance with such laws.

15. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement may be terminated by either party hereto for any reason upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party.

16. COUNTERPARTS
This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered, will be deemed to be an original, and which taken together will be deemed to be one and the same instrument, and will be binding as executed.

17. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE.

Unless otherwise prohibited by law or MILPITAS or VALLEY WATER policy, the parties agree that an electronic copy of a signed contract, or an electronically signed contract, has the same force and legal effect as a contract executed with an original ink signature. The term “electronic copy of a signed contract” refers to a transmission by facsimile, electronic mail, or other electronic means of a copy of an original signed contract in a portable document format. The term “electronically signed contract” means a contract that is executed by applying an electronic signature using technology approved by the MILPITAS and VALLEY WATER.

18. SIGNATURES
The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the legal capacity and authority to do so on behalf of their respective legal entities.

Agreement Between valley Water and MILPITAS for water Conservation Programs, FY 22 4

DocuSignEnvelopeID:0B61C9C2-3687-4AA4-8A5E-5E94950D0230 (SIGNATURESFOLLOWONNEXTPAGE)
AgreementBetweenValleyWaterandMILPITASforWaterConservationPrograms,FY225

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0B61 C9C2-3687-4AA4-8A5E-5E94950D0230 In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this AGREEMENT as of the EFFECTIVE DATE set forth above.

CITY OF MILPITAS
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
(—DocuSigned by: 1.—DocuSigned by:
(Jptr i.
___________
Diaz Ml4ris
City Attorney for City Manager
City of Milpitas City of Milpitas

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
an independent special district created by the California Legislature APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Joseph D. Aranda Rick L. Callendar
Assistant District Counsel Chief Executive Officer
Santa Clara Valley Water District Santa Clara Valley Water District Agreement Between Valley Water and MILPITAS for Water Conservation Programs, FY 22 6

DocuSignEnvelopeID:0B61C9C2-3687-4AA4-8A5E-5E94950D0230

EXHIBITA

INSURANCE
EachPartyrepresentsandwarrantsthat,atitssolecostandexpenseitwillmaintainforthedurationofthe AGREEMENTself-insuranceagainstclaimsforinjuriestopersonsordamagestopropertythatmayarisefrom,orin connectionwithits(anditsagents,representatives’,employees’orcontractors)’performanceoftheservicesand/or operationshereinandtheindemnityprovisionsofthisAGREEMENT.

A.TypesofCoverage
Coverageprovidedbysaidself-insuranceprogramsshallapplytoandbeinlieuofmaintainingGeneralandAuto LiabilityandWorkers’Compensationinsurance,aswellasProfessionalLiabilityErrorsandOmissionsinsurance, whenapplicable.

B.MinimumLimitsofCoverage
CoverageforCommercialGeneralandAutoLiabilityshallbefornotlessthan$1,000,000peroccurrenceand aggregate.CoverageforProfessionalLiabilityErrorsandOmissionsshallnotbeforlessthan$1,000,000perclaim andaggregate.CoverageforWorkers’CompensationcoverageshallbeasrequiredbytheCaliforniaLaborCode andincludeEmployersLiabilitylimitsofnotlessthan$1,000,000peraccident.

C.OtherSelf-InsuranceProvisions
EachParty’sself-insurancecoverageappliestotheotherParty,itsofficers,employees,agentsandcontractorsas respects:Liabilityarisingoutofactivitiesperformedbyoronbehalfof,theinsuringParty;productsandcompleted operationsoftheinsuringParty;premisesowned,leasedorusedbytheinsuringParty;andautomobilesowned, hiredorborrowedbytheinsuranceParty.Saidself-insuranceappliesfullytoanyindemnityfortheinsuredParty, itsofficers,employees,agentsandcontractors.

EachParty’sself-insurancecoverageshallbeprimaryasrespectstoinsuredParty,itsofficers,employees,agents andcontractors.Anyinsuranceorself-insurancemaintainedbyinsuredParty,itsofficers,agents,orcontractors shallbeexcessofinsuringParty’sself-insuranceandshallnotcontributewithit.

D.VerificationofCoverage
ExecutionofthisAGREEMENTshallconstituteeachParty’srepresentationandwarrantyastothecoverage requiredbythisAGREEMENT,andauthorityofthepersonsigningtheAGREEMENTtobindcoverageonitsbehalf.

E.Contractors
EachPartyshallobtainseparateevidenceofinsuranceforeachcontractor/consultant.

AgreementBetweenValleyWaterandMILPITASforWaterConservationPrograms,FY227

DocuSignEnvelopeID:78EE649F-A799-463E-A63E-9233469D1FA3

FIRSTAMENDMENTTOAGREEMENTBETWEENTHE

SANTACLARAVALLEYWATERDISTRICTANDTHE
/CITYOFMILPITASFORWATERCONSERVATION

PROGRAMS
ThisFirstAmendment(“FirstAmendment”)betweentheSantaClaraValleyWaterDistrict(“VALLEY WATER”)andtheCityofMilpitas(“MILPITAS”)amendstheAgreementenactedonJuly1,2021, betweenVALLEYWATERandMILPITASforWaterConservationPrograms(collectively,hereinafter referredtoasthe“Agreement”).VALLEYWATERandMILPITASmaybeindividuallyreferredtoasa “Party”orcollectivelyasthe“Parties”herein.ThisFirstAmendmentiseffectiveoncefullyexecutedby theParties(“FirstAmendmentEffectiveDate”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS,MILPITASwishestoincreasethecost-sharingamountsfortheLandscapeRebate ProgramtomatchVALLEYWATER’srebateamounts;and
WHEREAS,MILPITASwishestocost-shareonVALLEYWATER’SGraywaterRebateProgram tomatchVALLEYWATER’srebateamounts;and
WHEREAS,thePartiesdesiretoaddtheLawnBustMilpitasPilotProgramtothisAgreement;and WHEREAS,MILPITASwishestoworkwithOurCityForesttoimplementtheLawnBustMilpitas PilotProgram,awater-efficientlawnconversiondirectinstallationprogram;and WHEREAS,theLawnBustMilpitasPilotPrograminFY21-22providesresidentswithdirect installationservicesforwaterefficientlandscapeconversionsdesignedtoreducewaterdemandintheCity ofMilpitas;and
WHEREAS,VALLEYWATERseekstoreimburseMilpitasforprovidingsaidlandscape conversionservicesinanamountnot-to-exceed$40,000forFY21-22.

NOW,THEREFORE,inconsiderationofthemutualcovenantsandconditionshereincontained,the PartiesagreetoamendtheAgreementasfollows:

1.IntheAgreement,Section1,MILPITAS’RESPONSIBILITIESisamendedtostateasfollows:
h.MILPITASmustpayVALLEYWATERassetforthbelowforeachactivityperformedby VALLEYWATERintheMILPITASservicearea:
1)Provideupto$2.00pereachsquarefootofturfand/orpoolremovedperqualifiedresidential rebate,upto$2,000perresidentialsite,asperVALLEYWATER’SLandscapeRebateProgram requirements.
2)Provideupto$35.00per40-99gallonrainbarrel,$0.50pergallonfor100+galloncisterntanks, $1.00pereachsquarefootofroofareadivertedtodesignateraingardenareas,upto$300to Amendment#1toAgreementBetweenValleyWaterandMILPITASforWaterConservationPrograms1

DocuSign Envelope ID: 78EE649F-A799-463E-A63E-9233469D1 FA3 VALLEY WATER per subsection 2.d. below. The Rainwater Capture rebate total cap being $1,000 per residential site as per VALLEY WATER’S PROGRAM requirements below. 3) Provide up to $200 for Graywater Laundry to Landscape system installed as per VALLEY WATER’S Graywater Rebate Program.
k. Make payment to VALLEY WATER within (30) days of receipt of a bi-annual invoice from VALLEY WATER. When submitting an invoice, VALLEY WATER shall provide PROGRAM participation information. MILPITAS’ total payments to VALLEY WATER shall not exceed $50,000 annually and is subject to Milpitas City Council annual appropriation of funds.

1. MILPITAS shall administer the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program and contract directly with Our City Forest of direct installation services. Lawn Bust Milpitas projects will not be eligible for VALLEY WATER’s Landscape Rebate Program.
rn. MILPITAS shall invoice VALLEY WATER for eligible amounts specified in Section 2(h) below on a bi-annual basis, Invoices shall include a list of all participation information for which MILPITAS is seeking payment (see Appendix A for details of required invoice data).

2. In the Agreement, Section 2, VALLEY WATER’S RESPONSIBILITIES, is amended to state as follows:
a. Administration of Landscape Rebate Program (LRP) and Graywater Rebate funds including, but not limited to,
1) Processing the payment of the amounts set forth in Section 1. it above, to eligible persons residing in MILPITAS (“ELIGIBLE RESIDENTS”). This supplemental rebate amount shall be in addition to the customary amounts paid by VALLEY WATER. 2) Payment of standard Landscape Rebate Program and Graywater Rebate amounts to ELIGIBLE RESIDENTS within 8-12 weeks of approval of MILPITAS’ residential applicant’s request. h. Subject to the limitations, terms and conditions of this Agreement, VALLEY WATER agrees to pay MILPITAS the amounts specified below for lawn conversions completed through the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program for a not-to-exceed a total amount of $40,000 for projects completed in FY 2 1-22:
1) $2 per square foot for replacing turf with climate-appropriate landscaping. The total amount payable for turf replacement services shall not exceed 20,000 square feet of converted landscape.

All turf conversions must meet all of VALLEY WATER’s Landscape Rebate Program requirements.

3. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement not otherwise modified by this First Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

In WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties agree that this First Amendment shall be effective as of the First Amendment Effective Date set forth above, and have set forth below their consent to the terms and conditions of this First Amendment through the signatures of their duly authorized representatives.

Amendment #1 to Agreement Between Valley Water and MIIPITAS for Water Conservation Programs 2

DocuSignEnvelopeID:78EE649F-A799-463E-A63E-9233469D1FA3 InWITNESSWHEREOF,thepartieshaveexecutedthisFirstAmendmentasoftheEFFECTIVEDATE setforthabove.

SANTACLARAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT
anindependentspecialdistrictcreatedbytheCaliforniaLegislature APPROVEDASTOFORM:

DocuSignedby:DocuSignedby:
—3$3A2EBDC7984BD.—494EFB72ADSC4FS.

JosephArandaRickL.Callender,Esq.

AssistantDistrictCounselChiefExecutiveOfficer
SantaClaraValleyWaterDistrictSantaClaraValleyWaterDistrict

CITYOFMILPITAS
Approvedastoform:

DocuSignedby:DocuSignedby:

By:foy.
3tF1rJ.DiazforSteveMëlLff3
CityAttorneyCityManager
CityofMilpitasCityofMilpitas
Oct-26-2021
Date:
______________________________________
Amendment#1toAgreementBetweenValleyWaterandMILPITASforWaterConservationPrograms3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 78EE649F-A799-463E-A63E-9233469D1 FA3

APPENDIX A
Reporting Requirements
MILPITAS shall include the following data for the Lawn Bust Milpitas Program to Valley Water for each invoice:

Lawn Busters Direct Installation Program
1) Participants Full Name
2) Contact information, including email and phone number 3) Site Address
4) Approximate turf conversion area
5) Existing Irrigation System (yes/no)
6) First Contact Date
7) Conversion Date
8) Confimed Lawn Size
9) Verified Project Completion with site owner
10) Post Inspection: verified plant health; functioning irrigation system 11) Plant List for project site
12) Photos from sites, pre- and post-installation
Amendment # to Agreement Between Valley Water and MILPITAS for Water Conservation Programs 4

DocuSignEnvelopeID:3FO6FDCC-4615-4BE3-B012-E4F03D6AC555 SECONDArVIENDMENTTOAGREEMENTBETWEEN

THESANTACLARAVALLEYWATERDISTRICTAND

THECITYOFMILPITASFORWATERCONSERVATION

PROGRAMS
ThisSecondAmendment(“Amendment”)betweentheSantaClaraValleyWaterDistrict(“VALLEY WATER”)andtheCityofMilpitas(“MILPITAS”)amendstheAgreementenactedonJuly1,2021,between VALLEYWATERandMILPITASforWaterConservationPrograms(collectively,hereinafterreferredto asthe“Agreement”).VALLEYWATERandMILPITASmaybeindividuallyreferredtoasa“Party”or collectivelyasthe“Parties”herein.ThisSecondAmendmentiseffectiveoncefullyexecutedbytheParties (“SecondAmendmentEffectiveDate”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS,MILPITASandVALLEYWATERenteredintoanAgreementonJuly1,2021in regardstotheWaterConservationPrograms;
WHEREAS,thePartiesexecutedtheFirstAmendment,onOctober26,2021,tothisAgreementfor WaterConservationsProgramstoincreasethecost-sharingamounts,toaddcost-sharingtoadditionalWater ConservationPrograms,andaddtheLawnBustMilpitasPilotProgram;and WHEREAS,thePartiesnowwishtoenterintothisSecondAmendmentinordertocorrectan oversightintheFirstAmendmentandseektocorrecttheannualinvoicecapforMILPITAS’cost-sharing onVALLEYWATER’SLandscapeRebateProgramandGraywaterRebateProgramaswellasremoveany fiscalyearreferencetoavoidbillingconfusion.

WHEREAS,VALLEYWATERseekstoreimburseMilpitasforprovidingsaidlandscape conversionservicesinanamountnot-to-exceed$40,000forthedurationoftheagreement.

NOW,THEREFORE,inconsiderationofthemutualcovenantsandconditionshereincontained,the PartiesagreetoamendtheAgreementasfollows:

1.IntheAgreement,Section2.d.,VALLEYWATER’SRESPONSIBILITIES,isamendedtostateas follows:
d.InvoicingMILPITAS,onabi-annualbasis,fortheLandscapeRebateProgramandGraywater RebateProgram.VALLEYWATERshallnotinvoiceMILPITASforanyamountsexceedingthe $50,000capsetforthinSection1.k.above.

2.IntheAgreement,Section2.h.,VALLEYWATER’SRESPONSIBILITIES,isamendedtostateas follows:
h.Subjecttothelimitations,termsandconditionsofthisAgreement,VALLEYWATERagreesto payMILPITAStheamountsspecifiedbelowforlawnconversionscompletedthroughtheLawnBust MilpitasPilotProgramforanot-to-exceedatotalamountof$40,000forthedurationoftheagreement:

Amendment#2toAgreementBetweenValleyWaterandMILPITASforWaterConservationPrograms

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3FO6FDCC-4615-4BE3-B012-E4F03D6AC555

3. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement not otherwise modified by this Second Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

In WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties agree that this Second Amendment shall be effective as of the Second Amendment Effective Date set forth below and have set forth below their consent to the terms and conditions of this Second Amendment through the signatures of their duly authorized representatives.

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
an independent special district created by the California Legislature DocuSigned by:

Ric4f8r, Esq.

Chief Executive Officer
Santa Clara Valley Water District

CITY OF MILPITAS
Approved as to form:
,—DocuSigned by:

DocuSigned by:

By:
_______________
By:
______
Chri stJt5az for Steve Mc l-Iarts- D9F945EB50844F3...

City Attorney City Manager
City of Milpitas City of Milpitas
Apr-17-2022
Date:
________________________________________
Amendment #2 to Agreement Between Valley Water and MILPITAS for Water Conservation Programs 2

Amendment #3 to Agreement Between Valley Water and MILPITAS for Water Conservation Programs 1

THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT AND THE

CITY OF MILPITAS FOR WATER CONSERVATION

PROGRAMS
This Third Amendment (“Amendment”) between the Santa Clara Valley Water District (“VALLEY WATER”) and the City of Milpitas (“MILPITAS”) amends the Agreement enacted on July 1, 2021, between VALLEY WATER and MILPITAS for Water Conservation Programs (collectively, hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”). VALLEY WATER and MILPITAS may be individually referred to as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties” herein. This Third Amendment is effective once fully executed by the Parties (“Third Amendment Effective Date”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, MILPITAS and VALLEY WATER entered into an Agreement on July 1, 2021 in regards to the Water Conservation Programs; and
WHEREAS, the Parties executed the First Amendment, on October 26, 2021, to this Agreement for Water Conservations Programs to increase MILPITAS’ cost-sharing for VALLEY WATER’s Landscape Rebate Program, and add cost-sharing from VALLEY WATER to MILPITAS’ the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program; and
WHEREAS, the Parties executed the Second Amendment on April 17, 2022 in order to correct an oversight in the First Amendment and seek to correct the annual invoice cap for MILPITAS’ cost-sharing on VALLEY WATER’S Landscape Rebate Program and Graywater Rebate Program, as well as remove any fiscal year reference to avoid billing confusion; and WHEREAS, MILPITAS wishes to continue work with Our City Forest for an additional year of the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program; and
WHEREAS, Valley Water seeks to reimburse Milpitas for providing said landscape services by $40,000 for an additional year of the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program, which will increase the not to exceed amount to $80,000; and
WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to enter into this Third Amendment in order to issue a one year, no-cost time extension for the AMI Program and Water Use Reports Program, to account for time taken to complete AMI implementation, allow MILPITAS to bill for work completed during AMI implementation, and bill for AMI meters for up to 7 years, as originally intended. This Third Amendment extends the duration of the Agreement to 8 years, while maintaining the original cost-sharing amount for the original 7-year term. No additional costs shall be added to the programs outlined in the Agreement, except where additional funds have been added to support the continuation of the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program; and WHEREAS, the Parties seek to amend the invoice frequency for the AMI and Water Use Reports program to an annual basis, while maintaining the bi-annual data reporting requirement;

Amendment #3 to Agreement Between Valley Water and MILPITAS for Water Conservation Programs 2 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. In the Agreement, Section 1.e., MILPITAS’ RESPONSIBILITIES, is amended to state as follows:
e. Invoice VALLEY WATER, on an annual basis, for one hundred percent of the contract cost (net any grant funding received by MILPITAS) for MILPITAS to send home water use reports to MILPITAS residents, up to $2.25 per connection. MILPITAS shall not invoice VALLEY WATER for any amounts exceeding the $25,000 annual cap set forth in Section 2.e. below, to ensure funds are available for the duration of the Agreement. Only costs paid directly to home water use reports vendor shall be included in the annual invoice.

2. In the Agreement, Section 1.f., MILPITAS’ RESPONSIBILITIES, is amended to state as follows:
f. Invoicing VALLEY WATER, on an annual basis upon completion of AMI implementation, $10 per AMI water connection meeting all of the criteria below. MILPITAS shall not invoice VALLEY WATER for any amounts exceeding the $165,000 annual cap set forth in Section 2.f., to ensure funds are available for the duration of the Agreement.

1. AMI meter has been included in this Agreement for seven years or less, upon completion of AMI implementation;

2. AMI meter is scheduled to be read a minimum of once per hour;

3. AMI customer is provided access to an online water usage portal;

4. Leak alerts are issued to customers either via the portal or via other means. Leak alert settings for continuous leaks must not exceed five gallons per hour for single-family residential accounts with a duration not to exceed 72 hours; and duration of burst leaks is not to exceed 8 hours. For other meter classes, continuous volumes can be set by the utility with leak notifications within 72 hours.

3. In the Agreement, Section 2.f., VALLEY WATER’S RESPONSIBILITIES, is amended to state as follows:
f. Compensate MILPITAS $10 for each qualifying AMI water connection meeting the specifications in Section 1.f. above, for up to 7 years, upon completion of AMI implementation. VALLEY WATER will not reimburse MILPITAS for costs over the not-to-exceed annual program cap of $165,000.

The annual cap for this program is not to exceed $165,000.

4. In the Agreement, Section 2, VALLEY WATER’S RESPONSIBILITIES, is amended to state as follows:
i. Subject to the limitations, terms and conditions of this Agreement, VALLEY WATER agrees to pay MILPITAS the amounts specified below for lawn conversions completed through the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program, for a not-to-exceed total amount of $40,000 for projects completed between (estimated) October 2023 to February 2025:

1. $2 per square foot for replacing turf with climate-appropriate landscaping. The total amount payable for turf replacement services shall not exceed 20,000 square feet of converted landscape. All turf conversions must meet all of VALLEY WATER’s Landscape Rebate Program requirements.

5. In the Agreement, Section 6. TERM, is amended to state as follows:

Amendment #3 to Agreement Between Valley Water and MILPITAS for Water Conservation Programs 3 The term of the Agreement is from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2029, or until funds are depleted, whichever occurs first. The term of the Agreement may be extended by mutual consent of the Parties. This Agreement shall be contingent upon approval of program funding each fiscal year by both VALLEY WATER’s Board of Directors and by the City Council of MILPITAS. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement not otherwise modified by this Third Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

In WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties agree that this Third Amendment shall be effective as of the Third Amendment Effective Date set forth below and have set forth below their consent to the terms and conditions of this Third Amendment through the signatures of their duly authorized representatives.

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
an independent special district created by the California Legislature _________________________
Rick L. Callender, Esq.

Chief Executive Officer
Santa Clara Valley Water District

CITY OF MILPITAS
Approved as to form:

By: By: _____________________________________
Michael Mutalipassi Ned Thomas
City Attorney Acting City Manager
City of Milpitas City of Milpitas
Date: ___________________________________

1 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
CITY OF MILPITAS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into as of ________________, 20____ (“Effective Date”) by and between the City of Milpitas, a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 455 E. Calaveras Boulevard, Milpitas, California 95035 (“City”), and OUR CITY FOREST, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization incorporated in the State of California with its principal place of business at 1195 Clark Street, San Jose, CA 95125 (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” in this Agreement. RECITALS A. City is a public agency of the State of California and is in need of professional services for the following project: Administration and Implementation of Lawn Bust Milpitas Program (hereinafter referred to as “the Project”). B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such services. C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the services described herein. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Services. Consultant shall provide the City with the services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. Compensation. a. Subject to paragraph 2(b) below, the City shall pay for such services in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit B. b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of $ One Hundred and Twenty Thousand Dollars [$120,000.00]. This amount is to cover all printing and related costs, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses. Periodic payments shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice which includes a detailed description of the work performed. Payments to Consultant for work performed will be made on a monthly billing basis. 3. Additional Work. If changes in the work seem merited by Consultant or the City, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change is warranted, it shall be processed in the following manner: a letter outlining the changes shall be forwarded to the City by Consultant with a statement of estimated changes DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024Feb-16-2022

2 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
in fee or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services, or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement. 4. Maintenance of Records. Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the Agreement term and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the Agreement for inspection by City. 5. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from December 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City reserves the right to review the Consultant’s performance at the end of each year and cancel all or part of the Agreement. 6. Delays in Performance. a. Neither City nor Consultant shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; epidemics; war; riots and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage or judicial restraint. b. Should such circumstances occur, the non-performing party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement. 7. Compliance with Law. a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local government, including Cal/OSHA requirements. b. If required, Consultant shall assist the City, as requested, in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by federal, state and local regulatory agencies. c. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and/ or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement. 8. Standard of Care Consultant’s services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. 9. Assignment and Subconsultant DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

3 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City, which may be withheld for any reason. Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Consultant from employing independent associates, and subconsultants as Consultant may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder. 10. Independent Consultant Consultant is retained as an independent contractor and is not an employee of City. No employee or agent of Consultant shall become an employee of City. The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the work described in this Agreement, subject to such directions and amendments from City as herein provided. 11. Insurance. Consultant shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under Exhibit D (Insurance Requirements), attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required therein. 12. Indemnification. a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. b. If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance of “design professional” services (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault. 13. California Labor Code Requirements. a. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects (“Prevailing Wage Laws”). If the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is One Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($1,000.00) or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

4 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and all subconsultants to comply with all California Labor Code provisions, which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775), employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records (Labor Code Sections 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor (Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815) and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1). The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4. b. If the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants, as applicable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1. c. This Agreement may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subcontractor that affect Consultant’s performance of services, including any delay, shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Consultant caused delay and shall not be compensable by the City. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subcontractor. 14. Verification of Employment Eligibility. By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time, and shall require all subconsultants and sub-subconsultants to comply with the same. 15. Laws and Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of Santa Clara, State of California. 16. Termination or Abandonment a. City has the right to terminate or abandon any portion or all of the work under this Agreement by giving ten (10) calendar days written notice to Consultant. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports and other documents produced or developed for that portion of the work completed and/or being abandoned. City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered for any portion of the work completed prior to termination. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any task for the Project for DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

5 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
which a payment request has not been received, the charge for services performed during such task shall be the reasonable value of such services, based on an amount mutually agreed to by City and Consultant of the portion of such task completed but not paid prior to said termination. City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed services, and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of work. b. Consultant may terminate its obligation to provide further services under this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice to City only in the event of substantial failure by City to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Consultant. c. The Consultant understands and accepts that at all times; the Agreement is subject to appropriation of funds by the Milpitas City Council. The Agreement may terminate without penalty, liability or expense of any kind to the City at the end of Agreement term. The City has no obligation to make appropriations for the Agreement in lieu of appropriations for new or other contracts. City budget decisions are subject to the discretion of the Mayor and City Council. Consultant’s assumption of risk of possible non-appropriation is a part of the consideration for the Agreement. This section controls against any and all other provisions of the Agreement. 17. Documents. Except as otherwise provided in “Termination or Abandonment,” above, all original field notes, written reports, Drawings and Specifications and other documents, produced or developed for the Project shall, upon payment in full for the services described in this Agreement, be furnished to and become the property of the City. 18. Organization Consultant shall assign Gabby Fitts as Project Manager. The Project Manager shall not be removed from the Project or reassigned without the prior written consent of the City. 19. Limitation of Agreement. This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work included in the Project described above. 20. Notice Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to: CITY: City of Milpitas 1265 N. Milpitas Blvd. Milpitas, California 95035 Attn: Elaine Marshall, Deputy Public Works Director CONSULTANT: Our City Forest 1195 Clark Street, San Jose, CA 95125 Attn: Michael Pistininzi Director of Field Operations and shall be effective upon receipt thereof.

DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

6 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19

21. Third Party Rights Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant. 22. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. 23. Entire Agreement This Agreement, with its exhibits, represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein, and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both Parties hereto. This is an integrated Agreement. 24. Severability The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall not render the provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal. 25. Successors and Assigns This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators and assigns of each party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void. 26. Non-Waiver None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either party, unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing. 27. Time of Essence Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 28. City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with this Project or other projects. 29. Prohibited Interests DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

7 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no director, official, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 30. Wage Theft Prevention a. Consultant, and any subconsultant it employs to complete work under this Agreement, shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local wage and hour laws. Applicable laws may include, but are not limited to, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the California Labor Code and the Milpitas Minimum Wage Ordinance. b. BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AFFIRMS THAT IT HAS DISCLOSED ANY FINAL JUDGMENTS, DECISIONS OR ORDERS FROM A COURT OR INVESTIGATORY GOVERNMENT AGENCY, FINDING IN THE FIVE (5) YEARS PRIOR TO EXECUTING THIS AGREEMENT THAT CONSULTANT OR ITS SUBCONSULTANTS HAS VIOLATED ANY APPLICABLE WAGE AND HOUR LAWS. CONSULTANT FURTHER AFFIRMS THAT IT OR ITS SUBCONSULTANT(S) HAS EITHER FULLY SATISFIED EACH JUDGMENT, DECISION OR ORDER, OR, IF ANY JUDGMENT, DECISION OR ORDER HAS NOT BEEN FULLY SATISFIED, CONSULTANT AFFIRMS THAT IT OR ITS SUBCONSULTANT(S) IS CURRENTLY SATISFYING SAID JUDGMENT, DECISION OR ORDER THROUGH A PAYMENT OR ALTERNATIVE PLAN APPROVED BY THE APPLICABLE COURT/GOVERNMENT AGENCY AND THAT CONSULTANT OR ITS SUBCONSULTANT(S) ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SAID PLAN AS OF THE DATE OF EXECUTING THIS AGREEMENT. c. If at any time during the term of this Agreement, a court or investigatory government agency issues a final judgment, decision or order finding that Consultant or a subconsultant it employs to perform work under this Agreement has violated any applicable wage and hour law, or Consultant learns of such a judgment, decision, or order that was not previously disclosed in its bid/proposal, Consultant shall inform the City no more than fifteen (15) calendar days after the judgment, decision or order becomes final or from the date of learning of the final judgment, decision or order. Consultant or its subconsultant(s) shall, within thirty (30) calendar days after notifying the City, either (i) fully satisfy any such judgment, decision, or order and provide the City with documentary evidence of satisfying said judgment, decision or order; or (ii) provide the City documentary evidence of a payment or other alternative plan approved by the court/government agency to satisfy the judgment, decision or order. If the Consultant or its subconsultant is subject to a payment or other alternative plan, the Consultant or its subconsultant shall continue to submit documentary evidence every thirty (30) calendar days during the term of the Agreement demonstrating continued compliance with the plan until the judgment, decision or order has been fully satisfied. d. For purposes of this Section, a "final judgment, decision, or order" refers to one for which all appeals have been exhausted or the time period to appeal has expired. Relevant investigatory government agencies include: the United States Department of Labor, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, the City, or any other governmental entity or division tasked with the investigation and enforcement of wage and hour laws.

DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

8 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
e. Failure to comply with any part of this Section constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Such breach may serve as a basis for immediate termination of this Agreement and/or any other remedies available under this Agreement and/or law. f. Notice provided to the City shall be addressed to: Attention: Finance Director, 455 E. Calaveras Blvd. Milpitas, CA 95035. The Notice provisions of this Section are separate from any other notice provisions in this Agreement and, accordingly, only notice provided to the above address satisfies the notice requirements in this Section. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

9 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MILPITAS AND OUR CITY FOREST IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. CITY OF MILPITAS Approved By: Steven G. McHarris, City Manager Date Approved As To Form: Christopher J. Diaz, City Attorney Approved: Lauren Lai, CPA, MPA Finance Director/Risk Manager Approved As To Content: Tony Ndah, Public Works Director OUR CITY FOREST Signature Rhonda Berry Name President and CEO Title Date DIR Registration Number (If Applicable) DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024 Feb-10-2022
Feb-16-2022for

10 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
EXHIBIT A Scope of Services Lawn Bust Milpitas CONSULTANT will administer the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot, a turn-key lawn make-over program for residential homeowners in Milpitas. The pilot will convert up to 20,000 square feet of high-water using turf to drought-tolerant plants and complete an estimated 20 single family home lawn conversions. Services provided by CONSULTANT will include the following: Program Administration, Program Promotion, Site Consultation and Selection, Landscape Design and Installation, Customer Training, and Reporting. All completed conversion projects will meet Valley Water’s Landscape Conversion Requirements (https://scvwd.dropletportal.com/landscape-conversion-requirements). Program Administration 1. CONSULTANT will handle all program administrative functions including project management, schedule, customer service, records and document management. CONSULTANT will meet with City staff on a regular basis and provide project status reports and updates. OFC will provide all necessary staffing for the duration of the project. All inquiries will be responded to within five working days. Program Promotion 1. CONSULTANT will set up an online website that will include at least the following information: ● Program Description ● Program Eligibility Criteria ● Frequently Asked Questions ● Example Lawn Conversions with clear descriptions ● Link for residents to submit online applications ● Contact information (phone and email) for inquiries 2. CONSULTANT will help create a custom flyer advertising the program 3. All program materials will be reviewed and approved by City staff. Site Consultation and Selection 1. CONSULTANT will accept applications and will review for eligibility. CONSULTANT will follow up with interested applicants within 5 working days of application receipt. 2. CONSULTANT will evaluate sites and ensure that the site meets the program’s requirements. a. Eligibility criteria to be developed with and approved by City staff and will include at least the following: b. Projects must be located within the City of Milpitas c. Project applicant must be the homeowner d. Project will service only single-family homes DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

11 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
e. The conversion area must also be visible to others (ex: front yard). f. Approved project cannot participate in or apply for Valley Water’s Landscape Conversion Rebate. g. Converted projects will not include irrigation, and all plantings will require hand watering for ongoing maintenance h. Homeowner must agree to maintain the converted garden in healthy condition 3. CONSULTANT will meet with applicant to conduct a site survey to review potential lawn conversion, discuss the design options and preferences, and program conditions. 4. Upon confirmation of eligibility and homeowner’s willingness to agree to program conditions, CONSULTANT will formally notify applicants that the project is approved and follow up with approved applicants to complete the Homeowner and Stewardship Agreements before starting any design or construction. 5. CONSULTANT will complete a tailored landscape drought-tolerant garden design based on the landscape package chosen by the homeowner and will prioritize incorporating native plants where applicable. a. CONSULTANT will offer three landscape design packages and will collect a good faith deposit amount based on the package chosen: i. Basic Package: $100 deposit, includes replacing the lawn with groundcovers and native grasses ii. Urban Forest Garden: $250 deposit, incorporates trees and flowering shrubs. iii. Premium Oasis: $500 deposit, includes different mulch types for an additional cost and a more custom design. CONSULTANT will present the final design, which will include a proposed detailed installation schedule, for homeowner approval. 6. Upon homeowner approval of design and schedule, CONSULTANT will take all actions needed to complete the conversion project according to approved design and schedule, including but not limited to : a. Covering of the existing lawn and vegetation utilizing sheet mulching b. Capping of existing irrigation system c. Installation of new plants and mulch 7. CONSULTANT will provide homeowners with detailed instructions for ongoing maintenance. 8. CONSULTANT will schedule follow-up visits to ensure the plants are healthy. These will be conducted one (1), three (3), and five (5) weeks after installation.

DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

12 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
Reporting 1. CONSULTANT will provide City access to a live project queue sheet that outlines the active project site details. This list will include the application date, site survey date, approval date, site address, customer name, contact information, square feet to be converted, and completion date. CONSULTANT will also provide monthly status updates to the City. 2. CONSULTANT will invoice the City of Milpitas on a bi-annual basis for completed projects. With the invoice, CONSULTANT will include the following data for each project: 1) Participants Full Name 2) Contact information, including email and phone number 3) Site Address 4) Approximate turf conversion area 5) Existing Irrigation System (yes/no) 6) First Contact Date 7) Conversion Date 8) Confirmed Lawn Size 9) Landscape Design Package Selected by Homeowner 10) Deposit Amount Paid by Homeowner 11) Amount Due from City 12) Verified Project Completion with site owner 13) Post Inspection: verified plant health; functioning irrigation system 14) Plant List for project site 15) Photos from sites, pre-and post-installation 3. CONSULTANT will complete all the pilot projects by December 31, 2022.

DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

13 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
EXHIBIT B Schedule of Charges/Payments CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT the amounts specified below (not to exceed a total amount of $120,000) during the term of this agreement for completed and verified lawn conversions: • $6 per square foot for replacing turf with climate-appropriate landscaping. The total amount payable for turf replacement shall not exceed 20,000 square feet of converted landscape by December 31, 2022. DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

14 38077.00180\29167975.8 4/8/19
EXHIBIT C Activity Schedule PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE December 2021: Website and Outreach Materials published January 2022: First 2 site visits completed & conversions scheduled February 2022: 2 site visits & conversions scheduled and completed March 2022: 2 site visits & conversions scheduled and completed April 2022: 2 site visits & conversions scheduled and completed May 2022: 2 site visits & conversions scheduled and completed June 2022: 2 site visits & conversions scheduled and completed July 2022: All plantings paused for extreme heat. August 2022: All plantings paused for extreme heat. September 2022:2 site visits & conversions scheduled and completed October 2022:2 site visits & conversions scheduled and completed November 2022:2 site visits & conversions scheduled and completed December 2022: 2 site visits & conversions scheduled and completed. Program wrap up DocuSignEnvelopeID:9A6C99A1-36B2-4EE5-8D17-2DB6BC7EE024

Amendment #2 to Professional Services Agreement Between OUR CITY FOREST and MILPITAS for Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program
1 SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT BETWEEN OUR CITY FOREST AND THE

CITY OF MILPITAS FOR ADMINISITRATION AND

IMPLEMENTATION OF LAWN BUST MILPITAS

PROGRAM
This Second Amendment (“Second Amendment”) between Our City Forest (“OCF”) and the City of Milpitas (“MILPITAS”) amends the Agreement enacted on February 16, 2022, between OCF and MILPITAS for Administration and Implementation of the Lawn Bust Milpitas Program (collectively, hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”). OCF and MILPITAS may be individually referred to as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties” herein. This Second Amendment is effective once fully executed by the Parties (“Second Amendment Effective Date”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, MILPITAS and OCF entered into an agreement on February 16, 2022 in regards to the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program;
WHEREAS, the Parties executed the First Amendment, on December 9, 2022, to this Agreement for the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program to extend the term of the Agreement by six months to continue the services through June 30, 2023.

WHEREAS, the Parties successfully completed 20 lawn conversion projects between March 2022 and June 2023; and
WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to enter into this Second Amendment in order to extend the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program, a water-efficient lawn conversion direct installation program, into Phase 2 for an additional 15 months with up to 20 more Lawn Busts, not to exceed an additional 20,000 square feet of lawn conversions.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. In the Agreement, Section 2, COMPENSATION, is amended to state as follows:
b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of Two Hundred and Forty Thousand Dollars [$240,000]. This amount is to cover all printing and related costs, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses.

Periodic payments shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice which includes a detailed description of the work performed. Payments to Consultant for work performed will be made on a monthly billing basis.

2. In the Agreement, Section 5, TERM, is amended to state as follows:

Amendment #2 to Professional Services Agreement Between OUR CITY FOREST and MILPITAS for Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot Program
2 The term of this Agreement shall be from December 1, 2021 to February 28, 2025, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City reserves the right to review the Consultant’s performance at the end of each year and cancel all or part of the Agreement.

3. In the Agreement, Section 20, NOTICE, is amended to state as follows:

Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to:

CITY:

City of Milpitas
1265 N. Milpitas Blvd.

Milpitas, California 95035
Attn: Elaine Marshall,
Deputy Public Works Director
CONSULTANT:

Our City Forest
1195 Clark Street, San Jose, CA 95125
Attn: Michael Pistininzi
Director of Field Operations
and shall be effective upon receipt thereof.

4. In the Agreement, EXHIBIT A, Scope of Services, is amended to state as follows:

Lawn Bust Milpitas
CONSULTANT will administer the Lawn Bust Milpitas Pilot, a turn-key lawn make-over program for residential homeowners in Milpitas. The pilot will convert up to 40,000 square feet of high-water using turf to drought-tolerant plants and complete an estimated 20 single family home lawn conversions.

Services provided by CONSULTANT will include the following: Program Administration, Program Promotion, Site Consultation and Selection, Landscape Design and Installation, Customer Training, and Reporting. All completed conversion projects will meet Valley Water’s Landscape Conversion Requirements (https://scvwd.dropletportal.com/landscape-conversion-requirements).

Program Administration

1. CONSULTANT will handle all program administrative functions including project management, schedule, customer service, records and document management. CONSULTANT will meet with City staff on a regular basis and provide project status reports and updates. OFC will provide all necessary staffing for the duration of the project. All inquiries will be responded to within five working days.

Program Promotion

1. CONSULTANT will set up an online website that will include at least the following information:
●Program Description
●Program Eligibility Criteria
●Frequently Asked Questions
●Example Lawn Conversions with clear descriptions
●Link for residents to submit online applications
●Contact information (phone and email) for inquiries