Finance Committee
August 21, 2023

For these concerns and upgrades to be addressed, the existing entrance will need to be relocated westward along Robertson Road.

On January 22, 2019, by Resolution No. 2019-22, Council approved an agreement with West Yost Associates to provide Engineering Design Services for the Regional Water Recycling Facility - Sutter Campus Parking Lot and Security Upgrade Project in an amount not to exceed $527,794.

Engineering Design Services provided by West Yost, included the following:
 A new covered employee parking lot located west of the administration building which will include motorcycle parking, lighting, landscaping and site drainage  Analyze structural composition of current parking lots and rehabilitate or replace specifically parking lot adjacent to lab
 Provide new ornamental iron fence
 Provide road pavement and drainage improvements
 Prepare landscape and irrigation plan
 Entrance improvements
 Provide new entrance design to accommodate facility traffic circulation needs  Widen and design necessary grading modifications to existing entrance to accommodate selected entrance alignment
 Modify intersection of Sutter Avenue and Robertson Road to accommodate new entrance location
 Provide road pavement and drainage improvements
 Prepare landscape and irrigation plan
 Install card access and analyzer equipment at septic receiving station  Construct two-lane access to existing septic receiving station to increase efficiency  Provide road pavement and drainage improvements
DISCUSSION:

For this project to be constructed, the City needed to acquire additional land to the east of the RWRF-SC, which was owned by Tuolumne River Regional Park (TRRP) Joint Powers Authority (JPA).

On January 10, 2023, by Resolution No. 2023-33, Council approved the purchase and sale agreement of 5.01 acres of real property at 1500 Robertson Road to be used for the Regional Water Recycling Facility - Sutter Campus Parking Lot and Security Upgrade Project.

The following graphic represents the portion of the parcel acquired/sold, which is approximately five acres:
#14..
- 1058 -
Finance Committee, August 21, 2023
Upcoming Construction Project Report Regional Water Recycling Facility - Sutter Campus Parking Lot and Security Upgrade Project

City Staff worked closely with the consultant on this project to diligently address the recommendations identified in the Sutter Facility Layout Plan. The Construction Documents for this project are very close to being finalized, and with the acquisition of the necessary land for the project, staff is anticipating posting this project on the Planet Bids website in late August 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The following Capital Improvement Program Project has been created to track the expenses associated with this effort:
100372 – Sutter Plant Pkg Lot/Security
ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES:

Construction $6,000,000
Construction Contingency (12%) $720,000
Construction Administration – CM Consultant and City Staff (12%) $720,000 Engineering/Design/Administration – Consultant and City Staff $300,000 TOTAL: $7,740,000
CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

Environmental review has been provided through a Categorical Exemption under CEQA Section 15301 (Ex. Facilities) Class1, (b).

RECOMMENDED COMMITTEE ACTION
Staff Recommendation:

Motion recommending the approval of a report on the upcoming Regional Water Recycling Facility - Sutter Campus Parking Lot and Security Upgrade Construction Project and forwarding to Council for approval.

Approved by:

William Wong, Director of Utilities
#14..
- 1059 -
Finance Committee, August 21, 2023
Upcoming Construction Project Report Regional Water Recycling Facility - Sutter Campus Parking Lot and Security Upgrade Project

Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
#14..
- 1060 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COMMITEE AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

August 21, 2023
Date: August 1, 2023
TO: Finance Committee
David Wright, Chair
Rosa Escutia-Braaton, Vice-Chair
Nick Bavaro, Member
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: DeAnna Christensen, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Annual Investment Report – Fiscal Year 2022-2023 CONTACT: Calogero Maniscalco, Senior Financial Analyst, [email protected], 209-577-5219
DESCRIPTION:

Consider the Annual Investment Report for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and forwarding to Council for approval. (Funding Source: Various Funds)
STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

This item supports the City of Modesto 2020-2025 Strategic Plan focus of Governance and Service Delivery under Goal H: Achieve Financial Sustainability.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s Finance Department submits a monthly investment report to Council and the City Manager. The final of these reports each fiscal year is an annual report. Attached are the June investment reports (see attachment list below) generated by PFM Asset Management, the City’s investment advisor. Investments in the portfolio (attachment 4) are for the City of Modesto, Modesto Public Financing Authority, Community Facilities Districts, Tuolumne River Regional Park, Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency, and the Modesto-Ceres Fire Protection Agency Joint Powers Authority.

DISCUSSION:

It is the function of the Finance Department to deposit and invest funds in accordance with sound treasury management and to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the City. The purpose of the Monthly and Annual Investment Reports are to keep the City Council and City Manager informed of the City’s investment portfolio. As shown in Attachment 2, #15..
- 1061 -
Finance Committee, August 21, 2023
Annual Investment Report – Fiscal Year 2022-2023

on June 30, 2023 the City had a closing market value of $431,573,582 in its investment portfolio.

Interest rates rose significantly during the year, and the fixed income market responded to the Fed's continued rate hike cycle with increased yields as well as an inverted yield curve. This led to muted total return performance for the portfolio over the fiscal year. Over the past year the City’s Portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 48 basis points on a gross basis despite the volatility in the markets due to the turmoil in the financial sector in the spring. Over the past quarter, sector diversification was a boon to overall portfolio performance, with most sectors outperforming Treasuries. The higher interest rate environment we are now in has resulted in the continuation of a higher portfolio yield at cost and reflects the potential for higher earnings going forward.

U.S. Treasury Yields
Fiscal Year
End
6/30/23
Fiscal Year
End
6/30/22
Change
Year on
Year
3-month 5.43% 1.63% 3.80%
1-year 5.40% 2.74% 2.66%
2-year 4.87% 2.95% 1.92%
3-year 4.49% 3.01% 1.48%
5-year 4.13% 3.04% 1.09%
FISCAL IMPACT:

As mentioned, as of June 30, 2023, the City’s investment portfolio had an approximate market value of $431.5 million. For the year ending June 30, 2023, the City’s securities portfolio returned 0.05% versus the benchmark return of -0.43% (gross fees). This is a gross outperformance of 48 basis points (0.48%) against the benchmark.

The City’s portfolio is well balanced. The portfolio has sufficient liquidity with 49.35% in maturities under two years and 11.1% in overnight securities. The City’s portfolio remains diversified in U.S. government securities, corporate notes, negotiable CDs, and asset-backed securities. The City’s diversification has led to increased investment earnings vs the benchmark over the prior fiscal year.

In June, the approximate yield of the City’s combined investments was 2.75% (see attachment 3) on a weighted average. For the portfolio of securities alone, the yield to maturity on cost was

2.14%. For comparative purposes, the yields (as of June 30, 2023) of other investments commonly used by public agencies are listed below:
#15..
- 1062 -
Finance Committee, August 21, 2023
Annual Investment Report – Fiscal Year 2022-2023

Local Agency Investment Fund: 3.17%
1-Year U.S. Treasury Note: 5.40%
2-Year U.S. Treasury Note: 4.87%

The Portfolio maintains sufficient liquidity to meet the City's projected expenditure requirements for at least the next six months.

STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:

Motion recommending the Annual Investment Report for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and forwarding to Council for approval.

Approved by:

DeAnna Christensen, Director of Finance
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Monthly Investment Report

2. Account Statement

3. Combined Yields

4. Portfolio Holdings and Earnings Projections

5. Cash with Fiscal Agent
#15..
- 1063 -

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
Attachment 1
Percentages may not total to 100% due to rounding.

Investment Type No. of Investments Amount Invested
CAMP 1 47,969,833
Federal Agency 23 40,496,974
Federal Home Loan Bank 2 4,195,366
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. 5 7,802,620
Federal Nat’l Mortgage Assc. 16 28,498,987
Federal Agency CMO 2 2,813,823
U.S. Treasury 66 238,470,306
Commercial Paper 3 30,938,200
Negotiable CD 1 3,352,836
Corporate Note 22 51,357,426
Asset-Backed 9 3,365,838
Municipal 10 7,195,017
Supranational 2 5,613,329
Total Invested 139 431,573,582
Sector Allocation
June 30, 2023 versus May 31, 2023
Sector June 30, 2023 May 31, 2023 Change in Allocation Permitted by Policy
U.S. Treasury 55.3% 55.3% -0.08% 100%
Federal Agency 9.4% 9.4% 0.00% 100%
Federal Agency CMO 0.7% 0.7% -0.06% 100%
Commercial Paper 7.2% 7.1% 0.07% 25%
Negotiable CD 0.8% 0.8% 0.00% 30%
Corporate Note 11.9% 11.9% -0.01% 30%
Asset-Backed 0.8% 0.8% -0.05% 20%
Municipal 1.7% 1.7% 0.01% 100%
Supranational 1.3% 1.3% 0.01% 30%
CAMP 11.1% 11.0% 0.11% 100%
* Total invested includes only the bolded numbers
* * Amount invested are market values excluding accrued interest Additional, detailed information regarding security types and investment activity may be found in Attachment 2 accompanying this memo. Moreover, the addendum data will confirm continued compliance with the investment policy as well as with California Government Code.

RECENT ACTIVITY & CORPORATE EXPOSURE
The most aggressive series of interest rate hikes in recent history has come to a temporary pause in June, but a few more Fed rate hikes may still be coming. Monthly payroll numbers came in at 209,000 jobs in June, which is the lowest reading since December of 2020. Regardless, this is still a strong addition to the labor market especially when paired with an unemployment rate at 3.6%. Sector spreads tighten over the month, reflecting a more optimistic sentiment among investors, but remain elevated versus historical levels. In the Long-Term portfolio, we sold a short duration Treasury and replaced this with a longer duration Treasury. There was no activity in the Short-Term Portfolio over the month. #15..
- 1064 -

PERFORMANCE
U.S. Treasury yields moved higher across all tenors in June with the largest moves coming in the belly of the curve (two-to-ten-year portion). The continued rise in interest rates led to negative performance in both the Long-Term Portfolio and its benchmark during the period. The portfolio's shorter duration position relative to the benchmark and broad sector spread tightening led the portfolio to outperform the benchmark over the month. Since inception, the portfolio continues to outperform the benchmark.

1. Performance is calculated on trade-date basis, gross (i.e., before fees) in accordance the CFA Institute's Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS).

2. Performance numbers for periods greater than 1 year are presented on an annualized basis unless otherwise noted.

3. The performance calculation excludes any funds not invested in the 1-5 year strategy.

4. Performance benchmark through December 31, 2018 was the ICE BofAML 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index, and is now the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index, sourced from Bloomberg.

5. Inception date is 3/31/04.

Percentages may not add due to rounding.

Long-Term Portfolio Total Return
June 30, 2023
1 Month Trailing
12 Months
Trailing 36
Months
Trailing 60
Months
Since
Inception5
City of Modesto Investment Portfolio1,2,3-0.63% 0.05% -1.38% 1.22% 1.93% Modesto Performance Benchmark4-0.75% -0.43% -1.79% 0.84% 1.63% Average Portfolio Yields
June 30, 2023
Past
Month
Past 3
Months
Past
Year
Past 3
Years
Past 5
Years
City of Modesto Investment Portfolio 2.14% 2.08% 1.88% 1.63% 1.98% City of Modesto Short-Term Portfolio 5.21% 5.13% 4.03% - - $107.9
$25.0
$80.1
$113.3
$38.8
$66.5
$-
$30.0
$60.0
$90.0
$120.0
$150.0
Under 6
Months
6-12
Months
1-2 Years 2-3 Years 3-4 Years 4-5 Years
Millions
Maturity Distribution
June 30, 2023
#15..
- 1065 -

INVESTMENT POLICY
The City’s investment policy embraces the following standards: the prudent investor rule, requiring the safety of principal, through prudent and safe investments; sufficient liquidity to meet expected and unforeseen cash flows; generation of an above-market, risk-adjusted rate of return (meaning, returnsexpectations taking safety and liquidity into account). No investments longer than five years are permitted.

Some investments have maturity limits of 270 days or less. The table below details the City’s permitted investments.

Investment Type
Maximum
Maturity
Maximum Specified
% of Portfolio
Maximum
% per
Issuer
Minimum Quality
Requirements
Local Agency Bonds 5 Years None None None
Treasury Obligations 5 Years None None None
State Obligations 5 Years None None A rating
CA Local Agency Obligations 5 Years None None A rating
Federal Agencies 5 Years None None None
Supranationals 5 Years 30 percent 5 percent AA
Banker’s Acceptances 180 days 40 percent 5 percent Federal Reserve eligible Commercial Paper 270 days 25 percent 5 percent A1/P1 rating Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 Years 30 percent 5 percent A rating Certificates of Deposit 1 Year 20 percent 5 percent FDIC insured or collateralized Repurchase Agreements 90 days None 5 percent None
Reverse Repurchase Agreements 92 days 20 percent of
combined base value 5 percent None
Medium Term Notes 5 Years 30 percent 5 percent A rating Money Market Mutual Funds N/A 20 percent 10 percent Multiple Mortgage and Asset-backed Securities 5 Years 20 percent 5 percent AA Rating CAMP N/A None None N/A
LAIF N/A N/A None N/A
The City is not required to include a list of investments held by our bond trustees; however, staff believes the City Council should be kept informed of these investments. These investments are identified on Attachment A.

LONG TERM PORTFLIO INCOME RETURN
Monthly Income Return

0.13%
Fiscal Year-to-Date Income Return

1.37%
Prior 12 Months Income Return

1.37%
#15..
- 1066 -

472
575
784
286
482
693
769
663
557
781
614
569
364
904
414
254
364
370
568
352
350
324
290
239
472
248
217217
306
209
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Jan-21
Apr-21
Jul-21
Oct-21
Jan-22
Apr-22
Jul-22
Oct-22
Jan-23
Apr-23
Thousands
Monthly Change In
Nonfarm Payrolls

4.8 million new
jobs in 2022
Source: Bloomberg, as of June 2023. Data is seasonally adjusted.

Economic Summary
U.S. Job Markets Ease Over the Month but Remain Relatively Strong
0 5
10 15
20 25
Millions
Job Openings vs. Unemployed Workers
Job Openings Unemployed
The job openings to
unemployed ratio grew to

1.6:1
Record 7.2 million
new jobs in 2021

1.7 million
in 2023
#15..
- 1067 -

Source: Bloomberg, Bureau of Economic Analysis as of May 2023. “Supercore” inflation, strips out food and energy costs from headline PCE, but also removes housing costs.

Economic Summary
Consumers Continue to Spend on Services While Prices Remain Elevated

1.9%

0.3%

0.1%

0.6%

0.1%

3.4%
-0.1%
-1.0%

0.9%
-0.5%

1.2%

0.4%

0.7%

0.5% 0.4%
-1.5%
-1.0%
-0.5%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%
January-23 February-23 March-23 April-23 May-23
Change in Consumer Spending
Month-to-Month
Consumer Spending Goods Services

3.8%

4.5%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index
Year-over-Year
PCE PCE Supercore
#15..
- 1068 -

Source: ICE BofAML 1-5 year Indices via Bloomberg, MarketAxess and PFMAM as of 06/30/2023. Spreads on ABS are option-adjusted spreads of 0-5 year indices based on weighted average life; spreads on agencies are relative to comparable maturity Treasuries.

Economic Summary
Sector Spreads Tighten Over The Month
-0.05%

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

0.20%

0.25%

0.30%

0.35%
Jun-22 Sep-22 Dec-22 Mar-23 Jun-23
Federal Agency Yield Spreads

0.50%

0.60%

0.70%

0.80%

0.90%

1.00%

1.10%

1.20%
Jun-22 Sep-22 Dec-22 Mar-23 Jun-23
Corporate Notes A-AAA Yield Spreads

0.20%

0.30%

0.40%

0.50%

0.60%

0.70%

0.80%

0.90%

1.00%

1.10%

1.20%
Jun-22 Sep-22 Dec-22 Mar-23 Jun-23
Asset-Backed Securities AAA Yield Spreads
#15..
- 1069 -

Treasury Yields Continue On Their Path Upward
Source: Bloomberg as of 06/30/2023.

Economic Summary

5.41%

5.39%

4.53%

3.84% 3.86%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%

4.00%

4.50%

5.00%

5.50%

6.00%
3M1Y 2Y 3Y 4Y 5Y 10Y 30Y
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
June 30, 2023
May 31, 2023
March 31, 2023
#15..
- 1070 -

This material is based on information obtained from sources generally believed to be reliable and available to the public, however, PFM Asset Management LLC cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness or suitability. This material is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or a specific recommendation. All statements as to what will or may happen under certain circumstances are based on assumptions, some but not all of which are noted in the presentation. Assumptions may or may not be proven correct as actual events occur, and results may depend on events outside of your or our control. Changes in assumptions may have a material effect on results. Past performance does not necessarily reflect and is not a guaranty of future results. The information contained in this presentation is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities.

Investment advisory services are provided by PFM Asset Management LLC (“PFMAM”), an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. (“USBAM”). USBAM is a subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”). U.S. Bank is a separate entity and subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. The information contained is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities. Additional applicable regulatory information is available upon request.

For more information regarding PFMAM’s services or entities, please visit www.pfmam.com.

Disclosures
#15..
- 1071 -
For the Month Ending June 30, 2023
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement
CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
Asset-Backed Security 3,365,837.89 0.78
Federal Agency Bond / Note 40,496,974.14 9.38
Corporate Note 51,357,426.29 11.90
Certificate of Deposit 3,352,836.03 0.78
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security 2,813,823.00 0.65 Commercial Paper 30,938,200.17 7.17
Municipal Bond / Note 7,195,017.40 1.67
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 5,613,328.79 1.30
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 238,470,305.73 55.25
CAMP Pool 47,969,832.62 11.12
Total $431,573,582.06 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Portfolio Holdings Market Value
Cash Dividends
PFMAM Managed Account 108,878.10 383,603,749.44
CAMP Pool 0.00 47,969,832.62
Total $108,878.10 $431,573,582.06
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
58,330,354.94
10,237,726.80
12,558,805.51
26,804,500.28
24,991,353.92
80,097,604.63
113,302,205.84
38,781,081.27
66,469,948.87

0.00 13.52

2.37 2.91

6.21 5.79

18.56 26.25

8.99 15.40

0.00 Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $431,573,582.06
737
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation

0.78% ABS

9.38%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note

11.90%
Corporate Note

0.78%
Cert of Deposit

0.65%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security

7.17%
Commercial Paper

1.67%
Muni Bond / Note

1.30%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note 55.25%
US TSY Bond / Note

11.12%
CAMP Pool
Summary Page 1
#15..
- 1072 -
Managed Account Summary Statement For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$386,095,417.08
(474,932.60)
(3,824,010.55)
4,266,933.59

0.00 (2,459,658.08)
$383,603,749.44
276,080.88
(70,970.30)
(96,232.48)
$108,878.10
Total
401,540,914.45
1,354,908.61
3,824,568.36
474,932.60
275,523.07
(4,337,903.89)
(401,301,116.97)
(1,113,741.60)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $718,084.63
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Reconciling Transactions Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account

0.00 3,824,568.36
275,523.07
474,932.60
(4,337,903.89)
(0.28)

0.00 Cash Balance
Closing Cash Balance $800,993.69
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 1
#15..
- 1073 -
Portfolio Summary and Statistics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Account Summary
Description Par Value Market Value Percent
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 257,096,000.00 238,470,305.73 62.16 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note 5,885,000.00 5,613,328.79 1.46 Municipal Bond / Note 7,590,000.00 7,195,017.40 1.88
Federal Agency Commercial
Mortgage-Backed Security
2,932,501.73 2,813,823.00 0.73
Federal Agency Bond / Note 43,700,000.00 40,496,974.14 10.56 Corporate Note 53,680,000.00 51,357,426.29 13.39
Commercial Paper 31,105,000.00 30,938,200.17 8.07
Certificate of Deposit 3,355,000.00 3,352,836.03 0.87
Asset-Backed Security 3,500,311.08 3,365,837.89 0.88
Managed Account Sub-Total 408,843,812.81 383,603,749.44 100.00% Accrued Interest 1,354,908.61
Total Portfolio 408,843,812.81 384,958,658.05
Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00
Sector Allocation

0.88% ABS

0.87%
Cert of Deposit

8.07%
Commercial Paper

13.39%
Corporate Note

10.56%
Fed Agy Bond /
Note

0.73%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security

1.88%
Muni Bond / Note

1.46%
Supra-National
Agency Bond / Note 62.16%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years

15.63%

6.51%

20.88%

29.54%

10.11%

17.33%

0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 829

2.47%

4.82%
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 2
#15..
- 1074 -
Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)

3.37%
A

3.50%
A+

1.42%
A8.07%
A-1

3.20%
AA

75.01%
AA+

1.43%
AA3.93%
AAA

0.07%
NR
Issuer Summary
Issuer of Holdings Percent
Market Value
AMAZON.COM INC 4,828,658.77 1.26
APPLE INC 5,112,359.20 1.33
BANK OF AMERICA CO 1,940,468.40 0.51
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO 2,022,654.60 0.53
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES 93,517.00 0.02 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY 562,584.00 0.15
CARMAX AUTO OWNER TRUST 763,868.06 0.20
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES 729,278.80 0.19
FANNIE MAE 28,949,491.03 7.54
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4,195,366.34 1.09
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMIN FIN CORP 1,667,754.00 0.43 FREDDIE MAC 10,165,939.77 2.65
HOME DEPOT INC 3,356,899.29 0.88
HONDA AUTO RECEIVABLES 269,208.59 0.07
HYUNDAI AUTO RECEIVABLES 741,088.95 0.19
ING GROEP NV 10,237,726.80 2.67
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 3,859,148.48 1.01
INTL BANK OF RECONSTRUCTION AND DEV 1,754,180.31 0.46
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO 3,507,248.68 0.91
LMA AMERICAS LLC 10,339,951.05 2.70
LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 849,251.75 0.22
MASTERCARD INC 4,086,087.68 1.07
MICROSOFT CORP 5,701,542.00 1.49
NATIXIS NY BRANCH 10,360,522.32 2.70
NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY 461,453.85 0.12
NOVARTIS AG 2,171,490.21 0.57
PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 1,708,978.47 0.45
PFIZER INC 3,382,838.42 0.88
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2,292,305.40 0.60
STATE OF MARYLAND 588,200.20 0.15
TARGET CORP 333,984.49 0.09
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION 3,078,167.40 0.80 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 3
#15..
- 1075 -
Managed Account Issuer Summary For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Issuer of Holdings Percent
Market Value
TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 3,352,836.03 0.87
TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 3,081,247.95 0.80
UNITED STATES TREASURY 238,470,305.73 62.16
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 679,951.20 0.18
US BANCORP 2,817,580.48 0.73
WAL-MART STORES INC 5,089,613.74 1.33
Total $383,603,749.44 100.00%
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 4
#15..
- 1076 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/15/2020 0.125% 10/15/2023
91282CAP6 10,490,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/15/23 05/15/23 10,272,824.22 5.18 2,758.64 10,339,538.35 10,337,567.71

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2016 2.125% 11/30/2023
912828U57 3,275,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/07/19 01/09/19 3,216,408.21 2.52 5,894.55 3,270,013.46 3,231,504.07

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/15/2020 0.125% 12/15/2023
91282CBA8 4,430,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,263,528.91 2.41 242.08 4,384,942.18 4,328,940.63

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2018 2.625% 12/31/2023
9128285U0 270,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/30/19 01/31/19 270,801.56 2.56 19.26 270,081.72 266,456.25

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
9128286G0 457,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/11/21 08/12/21 480,671.17 0.33 3,627.75 463,178.40 447,860.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024
9128286G0 1,564,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/11/21 08/12/21 1,644,582.66 0.35 12,415.31 1,585,032.85 1,532,720.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/15/2021 0.250% 03/15/2024
91282CBR1 4,450,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,262,960.94 2.49 3,264.95 4,381,841.70 4,292,163.84

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/15/2021 0.375% 04/15/2024
91282CBV2 4,890,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/29/21 04/30/21 4,893,629.30 0.35 3,857.89 4,890,970.28 4,699,748.68

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 06/15/2021 0.250% 06/15/2024
91282CCG4 4,485,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,262,852.34 2.59 490.16 4,387,810.40 4,269,859.93

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2017 2.125% 07/31/2024
9128282N9 2,450,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/01/19 08/06/19 2,489,142.58 1.79 21,716.68 2,458,512.06 2,366,163.94

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2017 1.875% 08/31/2024
9128282U3 1,630,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/04/19 09/05/19 1,672,214.45 1.34 10,215.18 1,639,893.29 1,566,073.36

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 09/15/2021 0.375% 09/15/2024
91282CCX7 4,505,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,264,440.04 2.65 4,957.95 4,385,798.76 4,245,962.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024
9128282Y5 1,850,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/01/19 10/03/19 1,905,283.20 1.50 9,881.83 1,863,851.11 1,778,890.63

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2017 2.250% 10/31/2024
9128283D0 460,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/01/19 11/05/19 475,039.84 1.57 1,743.75 464,028.23 442,031.25 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 5
#15..
- 1077 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024
9128283J7 1,215,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/02/19 12/04/19 1,239,964.45 1.69 2,186.83 1,222,093.57 1,163,552.28

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024
9128283J7 3,450,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/03/20 01/07/20 3,529,916.02 1.63 6,209.53 3,473,139.46 3,303,913.89

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024
9128283J7 4,585,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/29/21 04/30/21 4,848,816.60 0.50 8,252.38 4,689,318.32 4,390,853.68

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 12/15/2021 1.000% 12/15/2024
91282CDN8 4,445,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,251,920.31 2.68 1,943.17 4,340,308.77 4,183,161.94

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 02/15/2022 1.500% 02/15/2025
91282CDZ1 4,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,255,109.38 2.70 24,795.58 4,317,502.47 4,153,187.28

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 04/30/2020 0.375% 04/30/2025
912828ZL7 4,945,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/29/21 04/30/21 4,894,777.34 0.63 3,124.22 4,922,002.77 4,549,400.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/02/2018 2.750% 06/30/2025
912828XZ8 4,230,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,232,148.05 2.73 316.10 4,231,328.88 4,057,495.52

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025
91282CAJ0 4,340,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/02/21 08/06/21 4,291,514.06 0.53 3,626.49 4,314,158.23 3,937,193.75

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025
91282CAJ0 4,635,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,262,932.62 2.74 3,873.00 4,397,739.64 4,204,814.06

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 09/30/2020 0.250% 09/30/2025
91282CAM3 1,100,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/27/21 09/28/21 1,076,023.44 0.80 691.26 1,086,528.55 996,187.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 09/30/2020 0.250% 09/30/2025
91282CAM3 4,550,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/07/21 09/09/21 4,473,574.22 0.67 2,859.29 4,507,609.99 4,120,593.75

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2020 0.250% 10/31/2025
91282CAT8 5,010,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/29/21 04/30/21 4,894,339.45 0.77 2,110.19 4,950,025.26 4,521,525.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2020 0.250% 10/31/2025
91282CAT8 6,930,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/04/21 10/06/21 6,783,278.91 0.78 2,918.89 6,845,778.54 6,254,325.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2020 0.375% 11/30/2025
91282CAZ4 4,250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/01/21 11/02/21 4,133,291.02 1.07 1,349.90 4,180,789.77 3,835,625.00 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 6
#15..
- 1078 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2020 0.375% 11/30/2025
91282CAZ4 4,635,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,254,785.16 2.75 1,472.18 4,383,139.76 4,183,087.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/02/21 02/04/21 498,613.28 0.43 5.09 499,292.32 450,703.10

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 1,040,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/07/21 01/08/21 1,035,978.13 0.45 10.60 1,037,978.00 937,462.45

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 3,735,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/05/21 04/07/21 3,646,439.65 0.89 38.06 3,688,184.41 3,366,752.16

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 2,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/02/21 07/07/21 2,353,875.00 0.80 3,754.14 2,373,883.69 2,154,374.88

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 5,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/17/22 02/18/22 4,719,531.25 1.85 7,821.13 4,816,325.04 4,488,281.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 5,775,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/04/22 01/06/22 5,570,167.97 1.27 9,033.41 5,644,740.06 5,183,964.55

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 7,980,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/03/22 05/04/22 7,256,812.50 2.95 12,482.53 7,480,429.69 7,163,296.48

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2019 2.500% 02/28/2026
9128286F2 3,210,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/01/21 03/01/21 3,492,881.25 0.70 26,822.69 3,360,818.33 3,042,478.13

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 4,645,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,259,973.05 2.76 7,762.70 4,381,731.40 4,172,516.17

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 6,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/03/21 12/07/21 5,838,281.25 1.15 10,027.18 5,898,087.86 5,389,687.20

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
91282CBT7 2,480,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/07/21 09/09/21 2,479,031.25 0.76 4,675.41 2,479,415.49 2,241,300.00

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026
91282CBT7 4,925,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/29/21 04/30/21 4,896,719.73 0.87 9,284.84 4,909,190.76 4,450,968.75

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 1,405,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/23/21 06/25/21 1,396,987.11 0.87 892.52 1,400,261.67 1,261,865.63 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 7
#15..
- 1079 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 4,615,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,253,551.76 2.76 2,931.66 4,360,912.62 4,144,846.87

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 4,800,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/06/22 06/08/22 4,399,125.00 2.99 3,049.18 4,506,172.14 4,311,000.00

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 08/31/2021 0.750% 08/31/2026
91282CCW9 4,640,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/06/22 04/07/22 4,258,106.25 2.75 11,631.52 4,365,046.01 4,138,300.00

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 4,310,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/05/22 04/07/22 3,968,398.83 2.77 9,479.64 4,062,302.63 3,856,103.13

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026
912828U24 4,545,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/06/22 06/08/22 4,355,920.90 3.01 11,609.51 4,401,178.57 4,204,125.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
912828V98 9,220,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/05/22 07/07/22 8,981,576.56 2.85 77,937.02 9,032,404.36 8,573,159.84

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2022 2.500% 03/31/2027
91282CEF4 910,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/29/22 11/30/22 854,973.44 4.03 5,718.58 862,382.20 852,840.63

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2020 0.500% 04/30/2027
912828ZN3 6,480,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/03/22 08/05/22 5,791,500.00 2.92 5,458.70 5,922,908.33 5,614,312.18

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/30/2020 0.500% 06/30/2027
912828ZV5 5,545,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/09/22 08/10/22 4,920,754.30 2.99 75.34 5,034,412.48 4,779,963.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027
9128282R0 1,200,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/29/22 08/31/22 1,142,625.00 3.30 10,143.65 1,152,261.46 1,109,250.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027
9128282R0 2,985,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/01/22 09/06/22 2,830,036.52 3.40 25,232.32 2,855,634.70 2,759,259.38

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
91282CFM8 5,380,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/01/22 11/03/22 5,344,903.91 4.27 55,784.43 5,349,604.28 5,349,737.50

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 10/31/2022 4.125% 10/31/2027
91282CFU0 2,715,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/06/22 12/08/22 2,752,755.47 3.81 18,868.51 2,748,426.68 2,700,576.56

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 10/31/2022 4.125% 10/31/2027
91282CFU0 3,160,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/13/22 12/14/22 3,229,495.31 3.63 21,961.14 3,221,734.61 3,143,212.50 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 8
#15..
- 1080 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
91282CAU5 8,775,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/04/23 01/06/23 7,472,803.71 3.91 7,391.98 7,603,097.37 7,488,914.06

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 12/31/2022 3.875% 12/31/2027
91282CGC9 4,250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/01/23 06/05/23 4,266,933.59 3.78 447.52 4,266,669.95 4,191,562.50

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2028
91282CGH8 2,220,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/16/23 05/18/23 2,218,265.63 3.52 32,410.77 2,218,310.02 2,156,175.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
91282CBJ9 3,450,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/31/23 01/31/23 2,994,761.72 3.66 10,793.16 3,032,407.38 2,958,913.89

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/29/2028
91282CGP0 2,825,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/03/23 03/07/23 2,793,660.16 4.25 37,769.02 2,795,657.64 2,804,695.31

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/29/2028
91282CGP0 2,970,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/03/23 03/06/23 2,931,134.77 4.29 39,707.61 2,933,631.88 2,948,653.13

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
91282CBS9 2,555,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/08/23 05/09/23 2,299,400.20 3.49 8,028.01 2,306,976.70 2,235,625.00

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
91282CGT2 2,675,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/01/23 05/02/23 2,672,178.71 3.65 24,374.66 2,672,273.01 2,613,140.63

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028
91282CHA2 3,320,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/01/23 05/01/23 3,304,567.19 3.60 19,577.17 3,305,082.74 3,226,106.42

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028
91282CHA2 6,530,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/03/23 05/04/23 6,559,844.14 3.40 38,505.71 6,558,894.63 6,345,323.76 Security Type Sub-Total 257,096,000.00 247,839,334.94 2.46 718,312.10 250,185,677.88 238,470,305.73 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note

INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023
459058JM6 1,790,000.00 AAA Aaa 11/17/20 11/24/20 1,786,151.50 0.32 459.93 1,789,486.87 1,754,180.31

INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
4581X0DZ8 4,095,000.00 AAA Aaa 09/15/21 09/23/21 4,091,969.70 0.52 5,573.75 4,093,755.81 3,859,148.48 Security Type Sub-Total 5,885,000.00 5,878,121.20 0.46 6,033.68 5,883,242.68 5,613,328.79 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 9
#15..
- 1081 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Municipal Bond / Note

CA ST TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 10/24/2019 2.400% 10/01/2023
13063DRJ9 2,310,000.00 AA- Aa2 10/16/19 10/24/19 2,356,223.10 1.87 13,860.00 2,312,957.25 2,292,305.40

MD ST TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 08/05/2020 0.510% 08/01/2024
574193TQ1 620,000.00 AAA Aaa 07/23/20 08/05/20 619,826.40 0.52 1,317.50 619,952.70 588,200.20

CA ST UNIV TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/17/2020 0.685% 11/01/2024
13077DMK5 600,000.00 AA- Aa2 08/27/20 09/17/20 600,000.00 0.69 685.00 600,000.00 562,584.00

CA ST DEPT WTR RES WTR SYS TXBL REV
BNDS
DTD 08/06/2020 0.560% 12/01/2024
13067WRB0 100,000.00 AAA Aa1 07/30/20 08/06/20 100,000.00 0.56 46.67 100,000.00 93,517.00

UNIV OF CAL TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 07/16/2020 0.883% 05/15/2025
91412HGE7 220,000.00 AA Aa2 07/14/20 07/16/20 220,796.40 0.81 248.22 220,300.37 204,916.80

UNIV OF CAL TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 07/16/2020 0.883% 05/15/2025
91412HGE7 510,000.00 AA Aa2 07/10/20 07/16/20 510,000.00 0.88 575.42 510,000.00 475,034.40

FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 505,000.00 AA Aa3 09/03/20 09/16/20 508,570.35 1.11 3,176.45 506,492.24 467,897.65

FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 1,295,000.00 AA Aa3 09/03/20 09/16/20 1,295,000.00 1.26 8,145.55 1,295,000.00 1,199,856.35

LOS ANGELES CCD, CA TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 11/10/2020 0.773% 08/01/2025
54438CYK2 925,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/30/20 11/10/20 925,000.00 0.77 2,979.27 925,000.00 849,251.75

NJ TURNPIKE AUTHORITY TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 02/04/2021 1.047% 01/01/2026
646140DP5 505,000.00 AA- A1 01/22/21 02/04/21 505,000.00 1.05 2,643.68 505,000.00 461,453.85 Security Type Sub-Total 7,590,000.00 7,640,416.25 1.22 33,677.76 7,594,702.56 7,195,017.40 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security

FANNIEMAE-ACES
DTD 04/01/2014 3.346% 03/01/2024
3136AJB54 457,501.73 AA+ Aaa 12/13/19 12/18/19 479,733.45 2.14 1,275.67 461,035.63 450,503.64 FHMS K061 A2
DTD 01/30/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
3137BTUM1 2,475,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/19/23 05/24/23 2,398,816.41 4.31 6,903.19 2,401,119.49 2,363,319.36 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 10
#15..
- 1082 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Security Type Sub-Total 2,932,501.73 2,878,549.86 3.96 8,178.86 2,862,155.12 2,813,823.00 Federal Agency Bond / Note

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023
3135G06H1 900,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/25/21 01/26/21 901,368.00 0.20 212.50 900,196.94 881,793.90

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 12/04/2020 0.250% 12/04/2023
3137EAFA2 2,015,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/02/20 12/04/20 2,013,005.15 0.28 377.81 2,014,715.80 1,971,520.33

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS NOTES
DTD 12/09/2013 3.375% 12/08/2023
3130A0F70 2,025,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/30/19 01/31/19 2,084,684.63 2.72 4,366.41 2,030,389.13 2,006,687.93

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 01/10/2020 1.625% 01/07/2025
3135G0X24 3,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/04/20 03/05/20 3,628,135.00 0.85 27,489.58 3,540,273.07 3,319,116.50

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 02/14/2020 1.500% 02/12/2025
3137EAEP0 640,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/27/20 02/28/20 649,676.80 1.18 3,706.67 643,163.26 604,218.24

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK NOTES
DTD 04/16/2020 0.500% 04/14/2025
3130AJHU6 2,370,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/15/20 04/16/20 2,358,244.80 0.60 2,534.58 2,365,791.59 2,188,678.41

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 475,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/29/20 04/30/20 475,731.50 0.59 569.01 475,265.96 439,312.78

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 1,910,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/03/20 06/05/20 1,919,779.20 0.52 2,288.02 1,913,627.41 1,766,499.79

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 3,195,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/22/20 04/24/20 3,188,418.30 0.67 3,827.35 3,192,614.86 2,954,956.46

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 3,345,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/01/20 05/04/20 3,347,475.30 0.61 4,007.03 3,345,901.97 3,093,686.80

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 200,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/17/20 09/18/20 200,712.00 0.42 38.89 200,294.58 183,477.00

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 1,075,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/01/20 10/05/20 1,080,041.75 0.40 209.03 1,077,106.61 986,188.87

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 1,190,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/04/21 01/05/21 1,197,223.30 0.36 231.39 1,193,189.10 1,091,688.15

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 3,675,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/17/20 06/19/20 3,667,392.75 0.54 714.58 3,672,009.65 3,371,389.88 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 11
#15..
- 1083 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Federal Agency Bond / Note

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 3,820,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/02/20 10/05/20 3,836,311.40 0.41 742.78 3,826,815.43 3,504,410.70

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 07/23/2020 0.375% 07/21/2025
3137EAEU9 2,220,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/21/20 07/23/20 2,208,944.40 0.48 3,700.00 2,215,448.05 2,025,658.98

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 450,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/22/20 10/23/20 447,480.00 0.49 590.62 448,879.05 409,139.55

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 550,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/15/20 10/16/20 548,289.50 0.44 721.87 549,242.13 500,059.45

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 2,360,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/25/20 08/27/20 2,348,955.20 0.47 3,097.50 2,355,240.56 2,145,709.64

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
3137EAEX3 130,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/29/20 09/30/20 129,829.70 0.40 132.71 129,923.70 117,892.06

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
3137EAEX3 3,400,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/23/20 09/25/20 3,389,766.00 0.44 3,470.83 3,395,427.24 3,083,330.80

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
3135G06G3 2,040,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/19/20 11/24/20 2,039,224.80 0.51 1,530.00 2,039,631.47 1,846,575.36

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
3135G06G3 2,215,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/09/20 11/12/20 2,207,070.30 0.57 1,661.25 2,211,255.06 2,004,982.56 Security Type Sub-Total 43,700,000.00 43,867,759.78 0.64 66,220.41 43,736,402.62 40,496,974.14 Corporate Note

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORP
NOTES
DTD 09/20/2018 3.450% 09/20/2023
89236TFN0 2,230,000.00 A+ A1 11/13/18 11/15/18 2,210,175.30 3.65 21,584.54 2,229,092.77 2,218,854.46

US BANK NA CINCINNATI CORP NOTES
(CALLAB
DTD 02/04/2019 3.375% 02/05/2024
91159HHV5 2,860,000.00 A A3 07/19/19 07/23/19 2,995,535.40 2.27 39,146.25 2,875,661.13 2,817,580.48

PFIZER INC CORP NOTES
DTD 03/11/2019 2.950% 03/15/2024
717081ES8 3,445,000.00 A+ A1 04/02/19 04/04/19 3,486,374.45 2.69 29,923.65 3,450,328.88 3,382,838.42 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 12
#15..
- 1084 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Corporate Note
AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024
023135BW5 1,590,000.00 AA A1 05/10/21 05/12/21 1,587,678.60 0.50 973.88 1,589,330.69 1,522,313.70

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK CORP NOTE
DTD 05/13/2014 3.625% 05/13/2024
46625HJX9 1,320,000.00 A- A1 09/22/20 09/24/20 1,461,028.80 0.65 6,380.00 1,353,689.62 1,296,653.16

WALMART INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 04/23/2019 2.850% 07/08/2024
931142EL3 4,000,000.00 AA Aa2 07/10/19 07/12/19 4,124,840.00 2.19 54,783.33 4,023,881.83 3,900,032.00

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORPORATE

NOTES (CAL
DTD 09/16/2020 0.653% 09/16/2024
46647PBS4 1,405,000.00 A- A1 09/09/20 09/16/20 1,405,000.00 0.65 2,675.94 1,405,000.00 1,388,627.54

PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 02/06/2020 1.800% 02/06/2025
69371RQ66 1,810,000.00 A+ A1 05/11/20 05/13/20 1,839,014.30 1.45 13,122.50 1,819,827.97 1,708,978.47

NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP
DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
66989HAP3 2,290,000.00 AA- A1 05/07/20 05/11/20 2,378,050.50 0.92 15,250.76 2,319,006.69 2,171,490.21

MASTERCARD INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 12/03/2019 2.000% 03/03/2025
57636QAN4 1,760,000.00 A+ Aa3 05/04/20 05/06/20 1,836,225.60 1.08 11,537.78 1,785,628.33 1,671,971.84 AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 04/13/2022 3.000% 04/13/2025
023135CE4 3,430,000.00 AA A1 04/11/22 04/13/22 3,424,546.30 3.06 22,295.00 3,426,755.65 3,306,345.07

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) CORP
NOTE
DTD 06/01/2021 0.824% 06/01/2025
46647PCH7 865,000.00 A- A1 05/24/21 06/01/21 865,000.00 0.82 593.97 865,000.00 821,967.98

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 11/13/2020 0.750% 11/13/2025
110122DN5 2,230,000.00 A+ A2 06/23/21 06/25/21 2,210,888.90 0.95 2,230.00 2,219,669.03 2,022,654.60

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 01/28/2021 0.750% 01/28/2026
06406RAQ0 3,465,000.00 A A1 02/02/21 02/04/21 3,465,831.60 0.75 11,044.69 3,465,423.71 3,078,167.40

BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/22/2022 3.384% 04/02/2026
06051GKM0 2,025,000.00 A- A1 03/17/22 03/22/22 2,025,000.00 3.38 16,941.15 2,025,000.00 1,940,468.40 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 13
#15..
- 1085 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Corporate Note

MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES
DTD 08/08/2016 2.400% 08/08/2026
594918BR4 3,000,000.00 AAA Aaa 02/23/22 02/25/22 3,033,150.00 2.14 28,600.00 3,022,532.49 2,816,202.00

MASTERCARD INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/21/2016 2.950% 11/21/2026
57636QAG9 2,560,000.00 A+ Aa3 12/20/22 12/22/22 2,434,099.20 4.33 8,391.11 2,450,915.32 2,414,115.84

TARGET CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
87612EBM7 365,000.00 A A2 01/19/22 01/24/22 364,379.50 1.99 3,281.96 364,558.10 333,984.49

MICROSOFT CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/06/2017 3.300% 02/06/2027
594918BY9 3,000,000.00 AAA Aaa 12/14/22 12/16/22 2,914,170.00 4.06 39,875.00 2,925,345.49 2,885,340.00

HOME DEPOT INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/14/2017 2.800% 09/14/2027
437076BT8 3,610,000.00 A A2 01/26/23 01/30/23 3,405,674.00 4.16 30,043.22 3,424,073.02 3,356,899.29

WALMART INC CORPORATE NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 04/18/2023 3.900% 04/15/2028
931142FB4 1,220,000.00 AA Aa2 05/16/23 05/18/23 1,217,279.40 3.95 9,648.17 1,217,346.13 1,189,581.74

APPLE INC CORP NOTES CALLABLE
DTD 05/10/2023 4.000% 05/10/2028
037833ET3 5,200,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/16/23 05/18/23 5,216,380.00 3.93 29,466.67 5,215,977.14 5,112,359.20 Security Type Sub-Total 53,680,000.00 53,900,321.85 2.53 397,789.57 53,474,043.99 51,357,426.29 Commercial Paper

NATIXIS NY BRANCH COMM PAPER
DTD 01/03/2023 0.000% 07/03/2023
63873KU39 10,365,000.00 A-1 P-1 01/04/23 01/05/23 10,106,799.21 5.14 0.00 10,362,115.07 10,360,522.32

ING (US) FUNDING LLC COMM PAPER
DTD 01/05/2023 0.000% 08/04/2023
45685RV46 10,290,000.00 A-1 P-1 01/10/23 01/11/23 9,997,020.83 5.15 0.00 10,241,408.33 10,237,726.80

LMA AMERICAS LLC COMM PAPER
DTD 05/05/2023 0.000% 09/07/2023
53944RW79 10,450,000.00 A-1 P-1 05/09/23 05/09/23 10,265,249.81 5.35 0.00 10,346,173.45 10,339,951.05 Security Type Sub-Total 31,105,000.00 30,369,069.85 5.21 0.00 30,949,696.85 30,938,200.17 Certificate of Deposit
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 14
#15..
- 1086 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Certificate of Deposit

TORONTO DOMINION BANK NY CERT
DEPOS
DTD 10/31/2022 5.470% 10/25/2024
89115B6F2 3,355,000.00 A A1 10/27/22 10/31/22 3,355,000.00 5.44 123,874.99 3,355,000.00 3,352,836.03 Security Type Sub-Total 3,355,000.00 3,355,000.00 5.44 123,874.99 3,355,000.00 3,352,836.03 Asset-Backed Security
HAROT 2020-1 A3
DTD 02/26/2020 1.610% 04/22/2024
43813RAC1 12,676.90 NR Aaa 02/19/20 02/26/20 12,674.41 1.61 5.67 12,676.41 12,655.82 CARMX 2020-1 A3
DTD 01/22/2020 1.890% 12/16/2024
14315XAC2 89,000.06 AAA NR 01/14/20 01/22/20 88,982.60 1.89 74.76 88,994.85 88,587.51 HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
43813GAC5 262,808.91 NR Aaa 02/17/21 02/24/21 262,804.09 0.27 19.71 262,806.81 256,552.77 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
44933LAC7 301,864.41 AAA NR 04/20/21 04/28/21 301,832.66 0.38 50.98 301,848.41 294,149.18 CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
14316NAC3 189,425.84 AAA NR 01/20/21 01/27/21 189,388.41 0.34 28.62 189,406.99 183,943.55 TAOT 2021-C A3
DTD 09/27/2021 0.430% 01/15/2026
89239BAC5 895,288.63 AAA Aaa 09/21/21 09/27/21 895,217.27 0.43 171.10 895,246.43 862,393.49 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
14314QAC8 509,246.33 AAA NR 04/13/21 04/21/21 509,136.59 0.52 117.69 509,186.45 491,337.00 HART 2021-C A3
DTD 11/17/2021 0.740% 05/15/2026
44935FAD6 465,000.00 AAA NR 11/09/21 11/17/21 464,896.21 0.75 152.93 464,933.61 446,939.77 DCENT 2021-A1 A1
DTD 09/27/2021 0.580% 09/15/2026
254683CP8 775,000.00 AAA Aaa 09/20/21 09/27/21 774,834.07 0.58 199.78 774,892.79 729,278.80 Security Type Sub-Total 3,500,311.08 3,499,766.31 0.54 821.24 3,499,992.75 3,365,837.89 Managed Account Sub-Total 408,843,812.81 399,228,340.04 2.47 1,354,908.61 401,540,914.45 383,603,749.44 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 15
#15..
- 1087 -
Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
$408,843,812.81 $399,228,340.04 2.47% $1,354,908.61 $401,540,914.45 $383,603,749.44 $384,958,658.05
$1,354,908.61
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 16
#15..
- 1088 -
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAP6 10,490,000.00 CITIGRP 98.55 10,337,567.71 64,743.49 (1,970.64) DTD 10/15/2020 0.125% 10/15/2023

0.30 5.17
US TREASURY NOTES 912828U57 3,275,000.00 BNP_PARI 98.67 3,231,504.07 15,095.86 (38,509.39) DTD 11/30/2016 2.125% 11/30/2023

0.42 5.36
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBA8 4,430,000.00 NOMURA 97.72 4,328,940.63 65,411.72 (56,001.55) DTD 12/15/2020 0.125% 12/15/2023

0.46 5.21
US TREASURY NOTES 9128285U0 270,000.00 MERRILL 98.69 266,456.25 (4,345.31) (3,625.47) DTD 12/31/2018 2.625% 12/31/2023

0.50 5.32
US TREASURY NOTES 9128286G0 457,000.00 WELLS_F 98.00 447,860.00 (32,811.17) (15,318.40) DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024

0.66 5.46
US TREASURY NOTES 9128286G0 1,564,000.00 WELLS_F 98.00 1,532,720.00 (111,862.66) (52,312.85) DTD 02/28/2019 2.375% 02/29/2024

0.66 5.46
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBR1 4,450,000.00 RBS 96.45 4,292,163.84 29,202.90 (89,677.86) DTD 03/15/2021 0.250% 03/15/2024

0.71 5.41
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CBV2 4,890,000.00 BARCLAY 96.11 4,699,748.68 (193,880.62) (191,221.60) DTD 04/15/2021 0.375% 04/15/2024

0.79 5.46
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCG4 4,485,000.00 NOMURA 95.20 4,269,859.93 7,007.59 (117,950.47) DTD 06/15/2021 0.250% 06/15/2024

0.96 5.45
US TREASURY NOTES 9128282N9 2,450,000.00 TD 96.58 2,366,163.94 (122,978.64) (92,348.12) DTD 07/31/2017 2.125% 07/31/2024

1.07 5.41
US TREASURY NOTES 9128282U3 1,630,000.00 MERRILL 96.08 1,566,073.36 (106,141.09) (73,819.93) DTD 08/31/2017 1.875% 08/31/2024

1.15 5.38
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCX7 4,505,000.00 BARCLAY 94.25 4,245,962.50 (18,477.54) (139,836.26) DTD 09/15/2021 0.375% 09/15/2024

1.21 5.35
US TREASURY NOTES 9128282Y5 1,850,000.00 HSBC 96.16 1,778,890.63 (126,392.57) (84,960.48) DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024

1.24 5.34
US TREASURY NOTES 9128283D0 460,000.00 MORGAN_S 96.09 442,031.25 (33,008.59) (21,996.98) DTD 10/31/2017 2.250% 10/31/2024

1.32 5.32
US TREASURY NOTES 9128283J7 1,215,000.00 NOMURA 95.77 1,163,552.28 (76,412.17) (58,541.29) DTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024

1.40 5.26
US TREASURY NOTES 9128283J7 3,450,000.00 RBS 95.77 3,303,913.89 (226,002.13) (169,225.57) DTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024

1.40 5.26
US TREASURY NOTES 9128283J7 4,585,000.00 HSBC 95.77 4,390,853.68 (457,962.92) (298,464.64) DTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024

1.40 5.26
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 17
#15..
- 1089 -
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CDN8 4,445,000.00 BNP_PAR 94.11 4,183,161.94 (68,758.37) (157,146.83) DTD 12/15/2021 1.000% 12/15/2024

1.45 5.25
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CDZ1 4,400,000.00 RBS 94.39 4,153,187.28 (101,922.10) (164,315.19) DTD 02/15/2022 1.500% 02/15/2025

1.60 5.14
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZL7 4,945,000.00 JPM_CHA 92.00 4,549,400.00 (345,377.34) (372,602.77) DTD 04/30/2020 0.375% 04/30/2025

1.83 4.99
US TREASURY NOTES 912828XZ8 4,230,000.00 BARCLAY 95.92 4,057,495.52 (174,652.53) (173,833.36) DTD 07/02/2018 2.750% 06/30/2025

1.96 4.92
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAJ0 4,340,000.00 WELLS_F 90.72 3,937,193.75 (354,320.31) (376,964.48) DTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025

2.16 4.81
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAJ0 4,635,000.00 BNP_PAR 90.72 4,204,814.06 (58,118.56) (192,925.58) DTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025

2.16 4.81
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAM3 1,100,000.00 BNP_PAR 90.56 996,187.50 (79,835.94) (90,341.05) DTD 09/30/2020 0.250% 09/30/2025

2.24 4.72
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAM3 4,550,000.00 HSBC 90.56 4,120,593.75 (352,980.47) (387,016.24) DTD 09/30/2020 0.250% 09/30/2025

2.24 4.72
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAT8 5,010,000.00 HSBC 90.25 4,521,525.00 (372,814.45) (428,500.26) DTD 10/31/2020 0.250% 10/31/2025

2.33 4.71
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAT8 6,930,000.00 TD 90.25 6,254,325.00 (528,953.91) (591,453.54) DTD 10/31/2020 0.250% 10/31/2025

2.33 4.71
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAZ4 4,250,000.00 WELLS_F 90.25 3,835,625.00 (297,666.02) (345,164.77) DTD 11/30/2020 0.375% 11/30/2025

2.41 4.69
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAZ4 4,635,000.00 WELLS_F 90.25 4,183,087.50 (71,697.66) (200,052.26) DTD 11/30/2020 0.375% 11/30/2025

2.41 4.69
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBC4 500,000.00 HSBC 90.14 450,703.10 (47,910.18) (48,589.22) DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025

2.49 4.59
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBC4 1,040,000.00 CITIGRP 90.14 937,462.45 (98,515.68) (100,515.55) DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025

2.49 4.59
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBC4 3,735,000.00 JPM_CHA 90.14 3,366,752.16 (279,687.49) (321,432.25) DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025

2.49 4.59
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBH3 2,400,000.00 BNP_PAR 89.77 2,154,374.88 (199,500.12) (219,508.81) DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026

2.57 4.62
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBH3 5,000,000.00 NOMURA 89.77 4,488,281.00 (231,250.25) (328,044.04) DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026

2.57 4.62
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 18
#15..
- 1090 -
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBH3 5,775,000.00 MORGAN_ 89.77 5,183,964.55 (386,203.42) (460,775.51) DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026

2.57 4.62
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBH3 7,980,000.00 JPM_CHA 89.77 7,163,296.48 (93,516.02) (317,133.21) DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026

2.57 4.62
US TREASURY NOTES 9128286F2 3,210,000.00 GOLDMAN 94.78 3,042,478.13 (450,403.12) (318,340.20) DTD 02/28/2019 2.500% 02/28/2026

2.57 4.60
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBQ3 4,645,000.00 NOMURA 89.83 4,172,516.17 (87,456.88) (209,215.23) DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026

2.65 4.59
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBQ3 6,000,000.00 WELLS_F 89.83 5,389,687.20 (448,594.05) (508,400.66) DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026

2.65 4.59
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CBT7 2,480,000.00 WELLS_F 90.38 2,241,300.00 (237,731.25) (238,115.49) DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026

2.72 4.51
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CBT7 4,925,000.00 MORGAN_ 90.38 4,450,968.75 (445,750.98) (458,222.01) DTD 03/31/2021 0.750% 03/31/2026

2.72 4.51
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCF6 1,405,000.00 MERRILL 89.81 1,261,865.63 (135,121.48) (138,396.04) DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026

2.89 4.52
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCF6 4,615,000.00 NOMURA 89.81 4,144,846.87 (108,704.89) (216,065.75) DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026

2.89 4.52
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCF6 4,800,000.00 CITIGRP 89.81 4,311,000.00 (88,125.00) (195,172.14) DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026

2.89 4.52
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCW9 4,640,000.00 RBC 89.19 4,138,300.00 (119,806.25) (226,746.01) DTD 08/31/2021 0.750% 08/31/2026

3.13 4.45
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CCZ2 4,310,000.00 RBC 89.47 3,856,103.13 (112,295.70) (206,199.50) DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026

3.20 4.39
US TREASURY NOTES 912828U24 4,545,000.00 RBC 92.50 4,204,125.00 (151,795.90) (197,053.57) DTD 11/15/2016 2.000% 11/15/2026

3.27 4.42
US TREASURY NOTES 912828V98 9,220,000.00 JPM_CHA 92.98 8,573,159.84 (408,416.72) (459,244.52) DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027

3.47 4.36
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CEF4 910,000.00 BARCLAY 93.72 852,840.63 (2,132.81) (9,541.57) DTD 03/31/2022 2.500% 03/31/2027

3.57 4.33
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 912828ZN3 6,480,000.00 NOMURA 86.64 5,614,312.18 (177,187.82) (308,596.15) DTD 04/30/2020 0.500% 04/30/2027

3.80 4.32
US TREASURY NOTES 912828ZV5 5,545,000.00 WELLS_F 86.20 4,779,963.00 (140,791.30) (254,449.48) DTD 06/30/2020 0.500% 06/30/2027

3.96 4.29
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 19
#15..
- 1091 -
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
US TREASURY NOTES 9128282R0 1,200,000.00 BNP_PAR 92.44 1,109,250.00 (33,375.00) (43,011.46) DTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027

3.92 4.27
US TREASURY NOTES 9128282R0 2,985,000.00 HSBC 92.44 2,759,259.38 (70,777.14) (96,375.32) DTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027

3.92 4.27
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CFM8 5,380,000.00 MERRILL 99.44 5,349,737.50 4,833.59 133.22 DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027

3.90 4.27
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CFU0 2,715,000.00 NOMURA 99.47 2,700,576.56 (52,178.91) (47,850.12) DTD 10/31/2022 4.125% 10/31/2027

3.99 4.26
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CFU0 3,160,000.00 JPM_CHA 99.47 3,143,212.50 (86,282.81) (78,522.11) DTD 10/31/2022 4.125% 10/31/2027

3.99 4.26
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CAU5 8,775,000.00 WELLS_F 85.34 7,488,914.06 16,110.35 (114,183.31) DTD 10/31/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027

4.28 4.24
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CGC9 4,250,000.00 NOMURA 98.63 4,191,562.50 (75,371.09) (75,107.45) DTD 12/31/2022 3.875% 12/31/2027

4.17 4.21
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CGH8 2,220,000.00 BNP_PAR 97.13 2,156,175.00 (62,090.63) (62,135.02) DTD 01/31/2023 3.500% 01/31/2028

4.21 4.20
US TREASURY NOTES 91282CBJ9 3,450,000.00 HSBC 85.77 2,958,913.89 (35,847.83) (73,493.49) DTD 01/31/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028

4.49 4.19
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CGP0 2,825,000.00 TD 99.28 2,804,695.31 11,035.15 9,037.67 DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/29/2028

4.25 4.17
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CGP0 2,970,000.00 JPM_CHA 99.28 2,948,653.13 17,518.36 15,021.25 DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/29/2028

4.25 4.17
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CBS9 2,555,000.00 BNP_PAR 87.50 2,235,625.00 (63,775.20) (71,351.70) DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028

4.60 4.18
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CGT2 2,675,000.00 RBS 97.69 2,613,140.63 (59,038.08) (59,132.38) DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028

4.36 4.17
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CHA2 3,320,000.00 BARCLAY 97.17 3,226,106.42 (78,460.77) (78,976.32) DTD 04/30/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028

4.46 4.15
US TREASURY N/B NOTES 91282CHA2 6,530,000.00 GOLDMAN 97.17 6,345,323.76 (214,520.38) (213,570.87) DTD 04/30/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028

4.46 4.15
Security Type Sub-Total 257,096,000.00 238,470,305.73 (9,369,029.21) (11,715,372.15) 2.59 4.69 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 20
#15..
- 1092 -
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES 459058JM6 1,790,000.00 TD 98.00 1,754,180.31 (31,971.19) (35,306.56) DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023

0.40 5.36
INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES 4581X0DZ8 4,095,000.00 JPM_CHA 94.24 3,859,148.48 (232,821.22) (234,607.33) DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024

1.23 5.40
Security Type Sub-Total 5,885,000.00 5,613,328.79 (264,792.41) (269,913.89) 0.97 5.39 Municipal Bond / Note
CA ST TXBL GO BONDS 13063DRJ9 2,310,000.00 MORGAN_S 99.23 2,292,305.40 (63,917.70) (20,651.85) DTD 10/24/2019 2.400% 10/01/2023

0.26 5.44
MD ST TXBL GO BONDS 574193TQ1 620,000.00 JPM_CHA 94.87 588,200.20 (31,626.20) (31,752.50) DTD 08/05/2020 0.510% 08/01/2024

1.08 5.44
CA ST UNIV TXBL REV BONDS 13077DMK5 600,000.00 GOLDMAN 93.76 562,584.00 (37,416.00) (37,416.00) DTD 09/17/2020 0.685% 11/01/2024

1.33 5.59
CA ST DEPT WTR RES WTR SYS TXBL REV 13067WRB0 100,000.00 MORGAN_ 93.52 93,517.00 (6,483.00) (6,483.00) BNDS
DTD 08/06/2020 0.560% 12/01/2024

1.42 5.36
UNIV OF CAL TXBL REV BONDS 91412HGE7 220,000.00 JPM_CHA 04/15/25 93.14 204,916.80 (15,879.60) (15,383.57) DTD 07/16/2020 0.883% 05/15/2025

1.78 4.75
UNIV OF CAL TXBL REV BONDS 91412HGE7 510,000.00 JPM_CHA 04/15/25 93.14 475,034.40 (34,965.60) (34,965.60) DTD 07/16/2020 0.883% 05/15/2025

1.78 4.75
FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS 341271AD6 505,000.00 MERRILL 92.65 467,897.65 (40,672.70) (38,594.59) DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025

1.97 5.17
FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS 341271AD6 1,295,000.00 MERRILL 92.65 1,199,856.35 (95,143.65) (95,143.65) DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025

1.97 5.17
LOS ANGELES CCD, CA TXBL GO BONDS 54438CYK2 925,000.00 MERRILL 91.81 849,251.75 (75,748.25) (75,748.25) DTD 11/10/2020 0.773% 08/01/2025

2.07 4.95
NJ TURNPIKE AUTHORITY TXBL REV 646140DP5 505,000.00 CITIGRP 91.38 461,453.85 (43,546.15) (43,546.15) BONDS
DTD 02/04/2021 1.047% 01/01/2026

2.46 4.74
Security Type Sub-Total 7,590,000.00 7,195,017.40 (445,398.85) (399,685.16) 1.32 5.22 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 21
#15..
- 1093 -
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FANNIEMAE-ACES 3136AJB54 457,501.73 JPM_CHAS 98.47 450,503.64 (29,229.81) (10,531.99) DTD 04/01/2014 3.346% 03/01/2024

0.66 5.68
FHMS K061 A2 3137BTUM1 2,475,000.00 CITIGRP 95.49 2,363,319.36 (35,497.05) (37,800.13) DTD 01/30/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026

3.00 4.81
Security Type Sub-Total 2,932,501.73 2,813,823.00 (64,726.86) (48,332.12) 2.63 4.95 Federal Agency Bond / Note
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G06H1 900,000.00 MORGAN_ 97.98 881,793.90 (19,574.10) (18,403.04) DTD 11/25/2020 0.250% 11/27/2023

0.41 5.31
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAFA2 2,015,000.00 CITIGRP 97.84 1,971,520.33 (41,484.82) (43,195.47) DTD 12/04/2020 0.250% 12/04/2023

0.43 5.41
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS NOTES 3130A0F70 2,025,000.00 BARCLAYS 99.10 2,006,687.93 (77,996.70) (23,701.20) DTD 12/09/2013 3.375% 12/08/2023

0.44 5.47
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G0X24 3,500,000.00 CITIGRP 94.83 3,319,116.50 (309,018.50) (221,156.57) DTD 01/10/2020 1.625% 01/07/2025

1.49 5.21
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEP0 640,000.00 WELLS_FA 94.41 604,218.24 (45,458.56) (38,945.02) DTD 02/14/2020 1.500% 02/12/2025

1.59 5.15
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK NOTES 3130AJHU6 2,370,000.00 CITIGRP 92.35 2,188,678.41 (169,566.39) (177,113.18) DTD 04/16/2020 0.500% 04/14/2025

1.78 5.02
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G03U5 475,000.00 WELLS_F 92.49 439,312.78 (36,418.72) (35,953.18) DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025

1.80 5.02
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G03U5 1,910,000.00 HSBC 92.49 1,766,499.79 (153,279.41) (147,127.62) DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025

1.80 5.02
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G03U5 3,195,000.00 CITIGRP 92.49 2,954,956.46 (233,461.84) (237,658.40) DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025

1.80 5.02
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G03U5 3,345,000.00 WELLS_F 92.49 3,093,686.80 (253,788.50) (252,215.17) DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025

1.80 5.02
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G04Z3 200,000.00 WELLS_F 91.74 183,477.00 (17,235.00) (16,817.58) DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025

1.96 4.97
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G04Z3 1,075,000.00 NOMURA 91.74 986,188.87 (93,852.88) (90,917.74) DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025

1.96 4.97
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G04Z3 1,190,000.00 RBS 91.74 1,091,688.15 (105,535.15) (101,500.95) DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025

1.96 4.97
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 22
#15..
- 1094 -
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Federal Agency Bond / Note
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G04Z3 3,675,000.00 NOMURA 91.74 3,371,389.88 (296,002.87) (300,619.77) DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025

1.96 4.97
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G04Z3 3,820,000.00 RBS 91.74 3,504,410.70 (331,900.70) (322,404.73) DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025

1.96 4.97
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEU9 2,220,000.00 WELLS_F 91.25 2,025,658.98 (183,285.42) (189,789.07) DTD 07/23/2020 0.375% 07/21/2025

2.05 4.90
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G05X7 450,000.00 NOMURA 90.92 409,139.55 (38,340.45) (39,739.50) DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025

2.14 4.87
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G05X7 550,000.00 CITIGRP 90.92 500,059.45 (48,230.05) (49,182.68) DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025

2.14 4.87
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G05X7 2,360,000.00 BARCLAY 90.92 2,145,709.64 (203,245.56) (209,530.92) DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025

2.14 4.87
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEX3 130,000.00 WELLS_F 90.69 117,892.06 (11,937.64) (12,031.64) DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025

2.22 4.83
FREDDIE MAC NOTES 3137EAEX3 3,400,000.00 CITIGRP 90.69 3,083,330.80 (306,435.20) (312,096.44) DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025

2.22 4.83
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G06G3 2,040,000.00 NOMURA 90.52 1,846,575.36 (192,649.44) (193,056.11) DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025

2.34 4.81
FANNIE MAE NOTES 3135G06G3 2,215,000.00 BARCLAY 90.52 2,004,982.56 (202,087.74) (206,272.50) DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025

2.34 4.81
Security Type Sub-Total 43,700,000.00 40,496,974.14 (3,370,785.64) (3,239,428.48) 1.76 5.02 Corporate Note
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORP 89236TFN0 2,230,000.00 JPM_CHAS 99.50 2,218,854.46 8,679.16 (10,238.31) NOTES
DTD 09/20/2018 3.450% 09/20/2023

0.23 5.67
US BANK NA CINCINNATI CORP NOTES 91159HHV5 2,860,000.00 GOLDMAN 01/05/24 98.52 2,817,580.48 (177,954.92) (58,080.65) (CALLAB
DTD 02/04/2019 3.375% 02/05/2024

0.51 5.93
PFIZER INC CORP NOTES 717081ES8 3,445,000.00 BONY 02/15/24 98.20 3,382,838.42 (103,536.03) (67,490.46) DTD 03/11/2019 2.950% 03/15/2024

0.62 5.58
AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES 023135BW5 1,590,000.00 JPM_CHA 95.74 1,522,313.70 (65,364.90) (67,016.99) DTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024

0.87 5.55
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 23
#15..
- 1095 -
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Corporate Note
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK CORP NOTE 46625HJX9 1,320,000.00 JPM_CHA 98.23 1,296,653.16 (164,375.64) (57,036.46) DTD 05/13/2014 3.625% 05/13/2024

0.86 5.73
WALMART INC CORPORATE NOTES 931142EL3 4,000,000.00 CITIGRP 06/08/24 97.50 3,900,032.00 (224,808.00) (123,849.83) DTD 04/23/2019 2.850% 07/08/2024

0.92 5.39
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORPORATE 46647PBS4 1,405,000.00 JPM_CHA 09/16/23 98.83 1,388,627.54 (16,372.46) (16,372.46)

NOTES (CAL
DTD 09/16/2020 0.653% 09/16/2024

0.21 1.63
PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP CORPORATE 69371RQ66 1,810,000.00 MITSU 94.42 1,708,978.47 (130,035.83) (110,849.50) NOTES
DTD 02/06/2020 1.800% 02/06/2025

1.57 5.49
NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP 66989HAP3 2,290,000.00 CITIGRP 01/14/25 94.82 2,171,490.21 (206,560.29) (147,516.48) DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025

1.51 5.11
MASTERCARD INC CORP NOTES 57636QAN4 1,760,000.00 JSEB 02/03/25 95.00 1,671,971.84 (164,253.76) (113,656.49) (CALLABLE)
DTD 12/03/2019 2.000% 03/03/2025

1.56 5.15
AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES 023135CE4 3,430,000.00 JPM_CHA 96.39 3,306,345.07 (118,201.23) (120,410.58) DTD 04/13/2022 3.000% 04/13/2025

1.74 5.14
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) CORP 46647PCH7 865,000.00 JPM_CHA 06/01/24 95.03 821,967.98 (43,032.02) (43,032.02) NOTE
DTD 06/01/2021 0.824% 06/01/2025

0.92 3.53
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO CORPORATE 110122DN5 2,230,000.00 MERRILL 10/13/25 90.70 2,022,654.60 (188,234.30) (197,014.43) NOTES
DTD 11/13/2020 0.750% 11/13/2025

2.27 4.96
BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE) 06406RAQ0 3,465,000.00 US_BANC 12/28/25 88.84 3,078,167.40 (387,664.20) (387,256.31) CORPOR
DTD 01/28/2021 0.750% 01/28/2026

2.47 5.45
BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES 06051GKM0 2,025,000.00 MERRILL 04/02/25 95.83 1,940,468.40 (84,531.60) (84,531.60) (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/22/2022 3.384% 04/02/2026

1.71 5.02
MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES 594918BR4 3,000,000.00 TD 05/08/26 93.87 2,816,202.00 (216,948.00) (206,330.49) DTD 08/08/2016 2.400% 08/08/2026

2.75 4.54
MASTERCARD INC CORP NOTES 57636QAG9 2,560,000.00 CSFB 08/21/26 94.30 2,414,115.84 (19,983.36) (36,799.48) (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/21/2016 2.950% 11/21/2026

3.01 4.79
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 24
#15..
- 1096 -
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Corporate Note
TARGET CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) 87612EBM7 365,000.00 CITIGRP 12/15/26 91.50 333,984.49 (30,395.01) (30,573.61) DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027

3.32 4.58
MICROSOFT CORP CORP NOTES 594918BY9 3,000,000.00 GOLDMAN 11/06/26 96.18 2,885,340.00 (28,830.00) (40,005.49) (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/06/2017 3.300% 02/06/2027

3.15 4.46
HOME DEPOT INC CORP NOTES 437076BT8 3,610,000.00 TD 06/14/27 92.99 3,356,899.29 (48,774.71) (67,173.73) (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/14/2017 2.800% 09/14/2027

3.73 4.65
WALMART INC CORPORATE NOTES 931142FB4 1,220,000.00 BARCLAY 03/15/28 97.51 1,189,581.74 (27,697.66) (27,764.39) (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/18/2023 3.900% 04/15/2028

4.38 4.48
APPLE INC CORP NOTES CALLABLE 037833ET3 5,200,000.00 HSBC 04/10/28 98.31 5,112,359.20 (104,020.80) (103,617.94) DTD 05/10/2023 4.000% 05/10/2028

4.37 4.39
Security Type Sub-Total 53,680,000.00 51,357,426.29 (2,542,895.56) (2,116,617.70) 2.07 4.97 Commercial Paper
NATIXIS NY BRANCH COMM PAPER 63873KU39 10,365,000.00 RBC 99.96 10,360,522.32 253,723.11 (1,592.75) DTD 01/03/2023 0.000% 07/03/2023

0.01 5.19
ING (US) FUNDING LLC COMM PAPER 45685RV46 10,290,000.00 MERRILL 99.49 10,237,726.80 240,705.97 (3,681.53) DTD 01/05/2023 0.000% 08/04/2023

0.10 5.25
LMA AMERICAS LLC COMM PAPER 53944RW79 10,450,000.00 MERRILL 98.95 10,339,951.05 74,701.24 (6,222.40) DTD 05/05/2023 0.000% 09/07/2023

0.20 5.55
Security Type Sub-Total 31,105,000.00 30,938,200.17 569,130.32 (11,496.68) 0.10 5.33 Certificate of Deposit
TORONTO DOMINION BANK NY CERT 89115B6F2 3,355,000.00 TD 99.94 3,352,836.03 (2,163.97) (2,163.97) DEPOS
DTD 10/31/2022 5.470% 10/25/2024

1.27 5.45
Security Type Sub-Total 3,355,000.00 3,352,836.03 (2,163.97) (2,163.97) 1.27 5.45 Asset-Backed Security
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 25
#15..
- 1097 -
Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Par Broker Date Price Value On Cost Amort Cost at Mkt Security Type/Description Next Call Market Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/L Effective YTM Duration
Asset-Backed Security
HAROT 2020-1 A3 43813RAC1 12,676.90 JPM_CHAS 99.83 12,655.82 (18.59) (20.59) DTD 02/26/2020 1.610% 04/22/2024

0.07 1.82
CARMX 2020-1 A3 14315XAC2 89,000.06 MERRILL 99.54 88,587.51 (395.09) (407.34) DTD 01/22/2020 1.890% 12/16/2024

0.15 2.21
HAROT 2021-1 A3 43813GAC5 262,808.91 JPM_CHA 97.62 256,552.77 (6,251.32) (6,254.04) DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025

0.43 1.61
HART 2021-A A3 44933LAC7 301,864.41 BARCLAY 97.44 294,149.18 (7,683.48) (7,699.23) DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025

0.50 1.56
CARMX 2021-1 A3 14316NAC3 189,425.84 MITSU 97.11 183,943.55 (5,444.86) (5,463.44) DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025

0.55 1.54
TAOT 2021-C A3 89239BAC5 895,288.63 BARCLAY 96.33 862,393.49 (32,823.78) (32,852.94) DTD 09/27/2021 0.430% 01/15/2026

0.70 1.91
CARMX 2021-2 A3 14314QAC8 509,246.33 MERRILL 96.48 491,337.00 (17,799.59) (17,849.45) DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026

0.62 1.89
HART 2021-C A3 44935FAD6 465,000.00 SMBC 96.12 446,939.77 (17,956.44) (17,993.84) DTD 11/17/2021 0.740% 05/15/2026

0.81 2.13
DCENT 2021-A1 A1 254683CP8 775,000.00 CITIGRP 94.10 729,278.80 (45,555.27) (45,613.99) DTD 09/27/2021 0.580% 09/15/2026

1.18 2.50
Security Type Sub-Total 3,500,311.08 3,365,837.89 (133,928.42) (134,154.86) 0.74 2.00 Managed Account Sub-Total 408,843,812.81 383,603,749.44 (15,624,590.60) (17,937,165.01) 2.16 4.82 Total Investments $384,958,658.05
$1,354,908.61
$383,603,749.44
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $408,843,812.81 ($15,624,590.60) ($17,937,165.01) 2.16 4.82% CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 26
#15..
- 1098 -
Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Transaction Type
Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
06/05/23 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 12/31/2022 3.875% 12/31/2027
06/01/23 91282CGC9 4,250,000.00 (4,266,933.59) (70,970.30) (4,337,903.89) Transaction Type Sub-Total 4,250,000.00 (4,266,933.59) (70,970.30) (4,337,903.89)

INTEREST
06/01/23 CA ST DEPT WTR RES WTR SYS TXBL

REV BNDS
DTD 08/06/2020 0.560% 12/01/2024
06/01/23 13067WRB0 100,000.00 0.00 280.00 280.00
06/01/23 06/01/23 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 0.00 1,144.53 1,144.53 06/01/23 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)

CORP NOTE
DTD 06/01/2021 0.824% 06/01/2025
06/01/23 46647PCH7 865,000.00 0.00 3,563.80 3,563.80
06/25/23 FANNIEMAE-ACES
DTD 04/01/2014 3.346% 03/01/2024
06/01/23 3136AJB54 681,564.83 0.00 1,900.43 1,900.43
06/25/23 FHMS K061 A2
DTD 01/30/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
06/01/23 3137BTUM1 2,475,000.00 0.00 6,903.19 6,903.19
06/04/23 FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 12/04/2020 0.250% 12/04/2023
06/04/23 3137EAFA2 2,015,000.00 0.00 2,518.75 2,518.75
06/08/23 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS NOTES
DTD 12/09/2013 3.375% 12/08/2023
06/08/23 3130A0F70 2,025,000.00 0.00 34,171.88 34,171.88 06/15/23 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/15/2020 0.125% 12/15/2023
06/15/23 91282CBA8 4,430,000.00 0.00 2,768.75 2,768.75
06/15/23 HART 2021-C A3
DTD 11/17/2021 0.740% 05/15/2026
06/15/23 44935FAD6 465,000.00 0.00 286.75 286.75
06/15/23 CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
06/15/23 14316NAC3 205,462.04 0.00 58.21 58.21
06/15/23 TAOT 2021-C A3
DTD 09/27/2021 0.430% 01/15/2026
06/15/23 89239BAC5 956,011.65 0.00 342.57 342.57
06/15/23 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 12/15/2021 1.000% 12/15/2024
06/15/23 91282CDN8 4,445,000.00 0.00 22,225.00 22,225.00 06/15/23 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 06/15/2021 0.250% 06/15/2024
06/15/23 91282CCG4 4,485,000.00 0.00 5,606.25 5,606.25
06/15/23 DCENT 2021-A1 A1
DTD 09/27/2021 0.580% 09/15/2026
06/15/23 254683CP8 775,000.00 0.00 374.58 374.58
CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 27
#15..
- 1099 -
Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Transaction Type
Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method

INTEREST
06/15/23 TAOT 2020-A A3
DTD 02/12/2020 1.660% 05/15/2024
06/15/23 89232HAC9 5,576.75 0.00 7.71 7.71
06/15/23 CARMX 2020-1 A3
DTD 01/22/2020 1.890% 12/16/2024
06/15/23 14315XAC2 117,722.41 0.00 185.41 185.41
06/15/23 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
06/15/23 44933LAC7 330,112.52 0.00 104.54 104.54
06/15/23 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
06/15/23 14314QAC8 546,934.62 0.00 237.01 237.01
06/17/23 FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
06/17/23 3135G04Z3 9,960,000.00 0.00 24,900.00 24,900.00 06/21/23 HAROT 2020-1 A3
DTD 02/26/2020 1.610% 04/22/2024
06/21/23 43813RAC1 55,501.45 0.00 74.46 74.46
06/21/23 HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
06/21/23 43813GAC5 293,859.14 0.00 66.12 66.12
06/30/23 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2018 2.625% 12/31/2023
06/30/23 9128285U0 270,000.00 0.00 3,543.75 3,543.75
06/30/23 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
06/30/23 91282CBC4 5,275,000.00 0.00 9,890.63 9,890.63
06/30/23 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 06/30/2020 0.500% 06/30/2027
06/30/23 912828ZV5 5,545,000.00 0.00 13,862.50 13,862.50 06/30/23 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/02/2018 2.750% 06/30/2025
06/30/23 912828XZ8 4,230,000.00 0.00 58,162.50 58,162.50 06/30/23 US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 12/31/2022 3.875% 12/31/2027
06/30/23 91282CGC9 4,250,000.00 0.00 82,343.75 82,343.75 Transaction Type Sub-Total 54,802,745.41 0.00 275,523.07 275,523.07

PAYDOWNS
06/25/23 FANNIEMAE-ACES
DTD 04/01/2014 3.346% 03/01/2024
06/01/23 3136AJB54 224,063.10 224,063.10 0.00 224,063.10 (10,888.07) 0.00 06/15/23 TAOT 2021-C A3
DTD 09/27/2021 0.430% 01/15/2026
06/15/23 89239BAC5 60,723.02 60,723.02 0.00 60,723.02 4.84 0.00 06/15/23 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
06/15/23 44933LAC7 28,248.11 28,248.11 0.00 28,248.11 2.97 0.00 CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 28
#15..
- 1100 -
Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF MODESTO - Combined Portfolio
Transaction Type
Trade Settle Security Description CUSIP Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method

PAYDOWNS
06/15/23 TAOT 2020-A A3
DTD 02/12/2020 1.660% 05/15/2024
06/15/23 89232HAC9 5,576.75 5,576.75 0.00 5,576.75 0.40 0.00 06/15/23 CARMX 2020-1 A3
DTD 01/22/2020 1.890% 12/16/2024
06/15/23 14315XAC2 28,722.35 28,722.35 0.00 28,722.35 5.64 0.00 06/15/23 CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
06/15/23 14316NAC3 16,036.20 16,036.20 0.00 16,036.20 3.17 0.00 06/15/23 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
06/15/23 14314QAC8 37,688.29 37,688.29 0.00 37,688.29 8.12 0.00 06/21/23 HAROT 2020-1 A3
DTD 02/26/2020 1.610% 04/22/2024
06/21/23 43813RAC1 42,824.55 42,824.55 0.00 42,824.55 8.39 0.00 06/21/23 HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
06/21/23 43813GAC5 31,050.23 31,050.23 0.00 31,050.23 0.57 0.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total 474,932.60 474,932.60 0.00 474,932.60 (10,853.97) 0.00 SELL
06/05/23 US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/15/2020 0.250% 11/15/2023
06/01/23 91282CAW1 3,910,000.00 3,824,010.55 557.81 3,824,568.36 (85,378.51) (85,882.26) FIFO Transaction Type Sub-Total 3,910,000.00 3,824,010.55 557.81 3,824,568.36 (85,378.51) (85,882.26) Managed Account Sub-Total 32,009.56 205,110.58 237,120.14 (96,232.48) (85,882.26) Total Security Transactions $32,009.56 $205,110.58 $237,120.14 ($96,232.48) ($85,882.26) CITY OF MODESTO - COMBINED PORTFOLIO Page 29
#15..
- 1101 -
Attachment 3
City of Modesto Combined Yields
Month
Ending
Combined
Yield
CAMP
Balance
CAMP Monthly
Distribution Yields
Long Term
Amortized Cost
Balance
Long Term
Portfolio Yield
Short Term
Amortized Cost
Balance
Short Term
Portfolio Yield
7/31/2021 1.02% 108,729,978.62 0.05% 273,119,224.63 1.40% 8/31/2021 1.01% 108,734,764.86 0.05% 272,424,046.82 1.39% 9/30/2021 0.97% 108,739,293.68 0.05% 275,543,849.60 1.33% 10/31/2021 0.91% 123,744,124.02 0.05% 274,089,339.67 1.30% 11/30/2021 0.90% 123,749,269.51 0.05% 275,079,950.15 1.28% 12/31/2021 0.91% 123,754,558.86 0.05% 274,968,424.92 1.29% 1/31/2022 0.92% 123,759,932.29 0.05% 276,103,753.02 1.31% 2/28/2022 0.92% 106,765,158.19 0.06% 276,530,404.21 1.31% 39,948,433.34 0.53% 3/31/2022 0.98% 106,788,084.24 0.25% 277,035,730.56 1.33% 39,948,380.00 0.53% 4/30/2022 1.39% 30,016,017.61 0.50% 353,203,903.46 1.56% 39,984,016.67 0.53% 5/31/2022 1.47% 50,044,305.28 0.82% 353,781,386.85 1.59% 39,880,961.12 1.26% 6/30/2022 1.56% 75,106,114.53 1.14% 354,423,884.74 1.64% 39,871,394.45 1.66% 7/31/2022 1.66% 46,186,072.35 1.64% 354,553,148.20 1.66% 39,928,141.66 1.66% 8/31/2022 1.79% 46,276,184.59 2.30% 356,564,454.56 1.69% 39,858,625.00 2.14% 9/30/2022 1.95% 46,375,593.86 2.61% 356,228,719.05 1.71% 39,880,797.64 3.34% 10/31/2022 2.03% 46,499,174.80 3.14% 357,511,536.00 1.74% 39,981,172.30 3.34% 11/30/2022 2.18% 46,648,406.54 3.90% 357,994,150.30 1.78% 40,170,337.16 3.76% 12/31/2022 2.29% 46,818,929.81 4.30% 357,777,379.76 1.84% 40,298,306.29 3.93% 1/31/2023 2.48% 46,999,023.63 4.53% 358,294,563.63 1.95% 40,452,260.96 4.84% 2/28/2023 2.51% 47,169,689.38 4.73% 358,174,068.29 1.94% 40,550,744.43 4.97% 3/31/2023 2.57% 47,361,889.08 4.80% 359,784,568.86 2.01% 40,708,200.79 4.97% 4/30/2023 2.58% 47,555,527.53 4.97% 357,043,234.53 1.99% 40,860,577.92 4.97% 5/31/2023 2.71% 47,763,982.55 5.16% 360,186,419.97 2.10% 41,114,697.00 5.21% 6/30/2023 2.75% 47,969,832.62 5.24% 360,251,679.25 2.14% 41,289,235.20 5.21% Notes:

1. Long and Short Term Portfolio AC Balance is the amortized cost value of the separately managed portfolios.

2. Long and Short Term Portfolio Yields are the separately managed portfolios yield at costs. #15..
- 1102 -
Attachment 4
City of Modesto - Portfolio Holdings and Earnings Projections Issuer Par Maturity Date Current Yield
Years to
Maturity
Expected Earnings
Rate to June 30, 2024
Expected Earnings to
June 30, 2024
Main Portfolio
Federal Agency
FNMA 900,000 11/27/2023 5.310% 0 726 2.53% 22,810
FHLMC 2,015,000 12/4/2023 5.410% 0 2,454 2.48% 50,191
FHLB 2,025,000 12/8/2023 5.470% 0 24,317 3.51% 71,319
FNMA 3,500,000 1/7/2025 5.210% 2 45,456 0.85% 29,869
FHLMC 640,000 2/12/2025 5.150% 2 12,320 1.18% 7,604
FHLB 2,370,000 4/14/2025 5.020% 2 25,520 0.60% 14,282
FNMA 3,195,000 4/22/2025 5.020% 2 38,651 0.67% 21,369
FNMA 475,000 4/22/2025 5.020% 2 5,114 0.59% 2,827
FNMA 3,345,000 4/22/2025 5.020% 2 36,998 0.61% 20,455
FNMA 1,910,000 4/22/2025 5.020% 2 17,966 0.52% 9,933
FNMA 1,190,000 6/17/2025 4.970% 2 8,483 0.36% 4,324
FNMA 3,820,000 6/17/2025 4.970% 2 30,672 0.41% 15,635
FNMA 1,075,000 6/17/2025 4.970% 2 8,441 0.40% 4,303
FNMA 200,000 6/17/2025 4.970% 2 1,669 0.42% 851
FNMA 3,675,000 6/17/2025 4.970% 2 39,187 0.54% 19,976
FHLMC 2,220,000 7/21/2025 4.900% 2 21,772 0.48% 10,597
FNMA 450,000 8/25/2025 4.870% 2 4,776 0.49% 2,221
FNMA 550,000 8/25/2025 4.870% 2 5,215 0.44% 2,425
FNMA 2,360,000 8/25/2025 4.870% 2 23,912 0.47% 11,120
FHLMC 3,400,000 9/23/2025 4.830% 2 33,140 0.44% 14,864
FHLMC 130,000 9/23/2025 4.830% 2 1,167 0.40% 523
FNMA 2,215,000 11/7/2025 4.810% 2 29,936 0.57% 12,725
FNMA 2,040,000 11/7/2025 4.810% 2 24,435 0.51% 10,387
Federal Agency CMBS
FNMA 457,502 3/1/2024 5.680% 1 6,560 2.76% 12,663
FHLMC 2,475,000 11/1/2026 4.810% 3 356,748 4.31% 107,024 U.S. Treasury
U.S. Treasury 10,490,000 10/15/2023 5.170% 0 159,425 4.49% 472,337 U.S. Treasury 3,275,000 11/30/2023 5.360% 0 34,538 3.46% 113,697 U.S. Treasury 4,430,000 12/15/2023 5.210% 0 49,099 3.34% 148,204 U.S. Treasury 270,000 12/31/2023 5.320% 1 3,484 3.33% 9,006 U.S. Treasury 1,564,000 2/29/2024 5.460% 1 3,608 1.57% 24,648 U.S. Treasury 457,000 2/29/2024 5.460% 1 1,022 1.56% 7,170 U.S. Treasury 4,450,000 3/15/2024 5.410% 1 78,481 2.93% 130,780 U.S. Treasury 4,890,000 4/15/2024 5.460% 1 13,589 1.10% 54,027 U.S. Treasury 4,485,000 6/15/2024 5.450% 1 111,769 2.65% 118,994 U.S. Treasury 2,450,000 7/31/2024 5.410% 1 47,659 1.79% 43,937 U.S. Treasury 1,630,000 8/31/2024 5.380% 1 25,542 1.34% 21,842 U.S. Treasury 4,505,000 9/15/2024 5.350% 1 144,987 2.65% 119,786 U.S. Treasury 1,850,000 9/30/2024 5.340% 1 34,853 1.50% 27,852 U.S. Treasury 460,000 10/31/2024 5.320% 1 9,649 1.57% 7,222 U.S. Treasury 1,215,000 11/30/2024 5.260% 1 29,262 1.69% 20,636 U.S. Treasury 3,450,000 11/30/2024 5.260% 1 79,995 1.63% 56,413 U.S. Treasury 4,585,000 11/30/2024 5.260% 1 32,824 0.50% 23,148 U.S. Treasury 4,445,000 12/15/2024 5.250% 1 174,579 2.68% 119,655 U.S. Treasury 4,400,000 2/15/2025 5.140% 2 194,290 2.70% 119,312 U.S. Treasury 4,945,000 4/30/2025 4.990% 2 57,416 0.63% 31,364 U.S. Treasury 4,230,000 6/30/2025 4.920% 2 231,505 2.73% 115,911 U.S. Treasury 4,340,000 8/31/2025 4.810% 2 49,781 0.53% 22,976 U.S. Treasury 4,635,000 8/31/2025 4.810% 2 276,027 2.74% 127,397 U.S. Treasury 4,550,000 9/30/2025 4.720% 2 68,771 0.67% 30,583 U.S. Treasury 1,100,000 9/30/2025 4.720% 2 19,943 0.80% 8,869 U.S. Treasury 6,930,000 10/31/2025 4.710% 2 126,433 0.78% 54,186 U.S. Treasury 5,010,000 10/31/2025 4.710% 2 90,610 0.77% 38,833 U.S. Treasury 4,250,000 11/30/2025 4.690% 2 109,637 1.07% 45,393 U.S. Treasury 4,635,000 11/30/2025 4.690% 2 309,111 2.75% 127,981 U.S. Treasury 1,040,000 12/31/2025 4.590% 3 11,827 0.45% 4,731 U.S. Treasury 500,000 12/31/2025 4.590% 3 5,418 0.43% 2,167 U.S. Treasury 3,735,000 12/31/2025 4.590% 3 83,122 0.89% 33,249 U.S. Treasury 2,400,000 1/31/2026 4.620% 3 50,042 0.80% 19,361 U.S. Treasury 5,775,000 1/31/2026 4.620% 3 190,450 1.27% 73,684 U.S. Treasury 5,000,000 1/31/2026 4.620% 3 240,282 1.85% 92,963 U.S. Treasury 7,980,000 1/31/2026 4.620% 3 610,121 2.95% 236,051 U.S. Treasury 3,210,000 2/28/2026 4.600% 3 60,160 0.70% 22,606 U.S. Treasury 6,000,000 2/28/2026 4.590% 3 184,892 1.15% 69,477 U.S. Treasury 4,645,000 2/28/2026 4.590% 3 341,868 2.76% 128,464 U.S. Treasury 4,925,000 3/31/2026 4.510% 3 117,910 0.87% 42,940 U.S. Treasury 2,480,000 3/31/2026 4.510% 3 51,809 0.76% 18,868 U.S. Treasury 1,405,000 5/31/2026 4.520% 3 35,632 0.87% 12,234 U.S. Treasury 4,615,000 5/31/2026 4.520% 3 372,140 2.76% 127,770 U.S. Treasury 4,800,000 5/31/2026 4.520% 3 419,496 2.99% 144,029 U.S. Treasury 4,640,000 8/31/2026 4.450% 3 404,843 2.75% 127,955 U.S. Treasury 4,310,000 9/30/2026 4.390% 3 388,290 2.77% 119,625 U.S. Treasury 4,545,000 11/15/2026 4.420% 3 462,339 3.01% 137,128 U.S. Treasury 9,220,000 2/15/2027 4.360% 4 955,475 2.85% 263,728 U.S. Treasury 910,000 3/31/2027 4.330% 4 137,805 4.03% 36,815 U.S. Treasury 6,480,000 4/30/2027 4.320% 4 725,274 2.92% 189,607 U.S. Treasury 5,545,000 6/30/2027 4.290% 4 664,194 2.99% 166,389 U.S. Treasury 1,200,000 8/15/2027 4.270% 4 163,674 3.30% 39,751 U.S. Treasury 2,985,000 8/15/2027 4.270% 4 419,058 3.40% 101,775 U.S. Treasury 5,380,000 9/30/2027 4.270% 4 978,131 4.27% 230,519 U.S. Treasury 2,715,000 10/31/2027 4.260% 4 448,929 3.81% 103,730 U.S. Treasury 3,160,000 10/31/2027 4.260% 4 497,567 3.63% 114,968 U.S. Treasury 8,775,000 10/31/2027 4.240% 4 1,489,423 3.91% 344,147 U.S. Treasury 4,250,000 12/31/2027 4.210% 5 723,779 3.78% 161,035 U.S. Treasury 3,450,000 1/31/2028 4.190% 5 580,131 3.66% 126,687 U.S. Treasury 2,220,000 1/31/2028 4.200% 5 358,546 3.52% 78,298 U.S. Treasury 2,825,000 2/29/2028 4.170% 5 560,748 4.25% 120,372 U.S. Treasury 2,970,000 2/29/2028 4.170% 5 595,775 4.29% 127,891 U.S. Treasury 2,555,000 3/31/2028 4.180% 5 424,288 3.49% 89,453 U.S. Treasury 2,675,000 3/31/2028 4.170% 5 464,140 3.65% 97,854 U.S. Treasury 3,320,000 4/30/2028 4.150% 5 578,675 3.60% 119,929 U.S. Treasury 6,530,000 4/30/2028 4.150% 5 1,074,074 3.40% 222,600 6/30/2023
Earnings to
Maturity
#15..
- 1103 -
Attachment 4
City of Modesto - Portfolio Holdings and Earnings Projections Issuer Par Maturity Date Current Yield
Years to
Maturity
Expected Earnings
Rate to June 30, 2024
Expected Earnings to
June 30, 2024
6/30/2023
Earnings to
Maturity
Commercial Paper
Natixis NY Branch 10,365,000 7/3/2023 5.190% 0 4,377 4.34% 451,222 ING Funding LLC 10,290,000 8/4/2023 5.250% 0 50,781 4.38% 451,798 LMA Americas LLC 10,450,000 9/7/2023 5.550% 0 105,780 4.46% 467,435 Negotiable CD
Toronto-Dominion Bank 3,355,000 10/25/2024 5.450% 1 241,524 5.44% 183,018 Corporate Note
Toyota Motor Corp 2,230,000 9/20/2023 5.670% 0 18,291 4.11% 91,796 US Bancorp 2,860,000 2/5/2024 5.930% 1 39,112 2.98% 85,513 Pfizer Inc 3,445,000 3/15/2024 5.580% 1 65,729 3.07% 106,217 Amazon.Com Inc 1,590,000 5/12/2024 5.550% 1 6,892 0.96% 15,307 JPMorgan Chase & Co 1,320,000 5/13/2024 5.730% 1 7,442 1.08% 14,284 Wal-Mart Stores Inc 4,000,000 7/8/2024 5.390% 1 89,605 2.19% 87,689 JPMorgan Chase & Co 1,405,000 9/16/2024 1.630% 1 11,160 0.65% 9,200 Paccar Financial Corp 1,810,000 2/6/2025 5.490% 2 42,149 1.45% 26,281 Novartis Capital Corp 2,290,000 2/14/2025 5.110% 2 34,423 0.92% 21,174 Mastercard Inc 1,760,000 3/3/2025 5.150% 2 31,763 1.08% 18,995 Amazon.Com Inc 3,430,000 4/13/2025 5.140% 2 187,521 3.06% 105,104 JPMorgan Chase & Co 865,000 6/1/2025 3.530% 2 13,708 0.82% 7,147 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2,230,000 11/13/2025 4.960% 2 50,324 0.95% 21,244 The Bank Of New York Mellon Corporation 3,465,000 1/28/2026 5.450% 3 66,700 0.75% 25,888 Bank Of America Co 2,025,000 4/2/2026 5.020% 3 189,044 3.38% 68,709 Microsoft Corp 3,000,000 8/8/2026 4.540% 3 199,485 2.14% 64,327 Mastercard Inc 2,560,000 11/21/2026 4.790% 3 376,483 4.33% 111,123 Target Corp 365,000 1/15/2027 4.580% 4 25,720 1.99% 7,269 Microsoft Corp 3,000,000 2/6/2027 4.460% 4 439,156 4.06% 122,043 Home Depot Inc 3,610,000 9/14/2027 4.650% 4 632,075 4.16% 150,514 Wal-Mart Stores Inc 1,220,000 4/15/2028 4.480% 5 231,174 3.95% 48,321 Apple Inc 5,200,000 5/10/2028 4.390% 5 994,246 3.93% 204,895 Asset-Backed Securities
Honda Auto Receivables 12,677 4/22/2024 1.820% 1 167 2.06% 262 Carmax Auto Owner Trust 89,000 12/16/2024 2.210% 1 2,471 1.89% 1,690 Honda Auto Receivables 262,809 4/21/2025 1.610% 2 1,287 0.27% 713 Hyundai Auto Receivables 301,864 9/15/2025 1.560% 2 2,555 0.38% 1,158 Carmax Auto Owner Trust 189,426 12/15/2025 1.540% 2 1,605 0.34% 654 Toyota Motor Corp 895,289 1/15/2026 1.910% 3 9,852 0.43% 3,877 Carmax Auto Owner Trust 509,246 2/17/2026 1.890% 3 7,046 0.52% 2,678 Hyundai Auto Receivables 465,000 5/15/2026 2.130% 3 9,966 0.75% 3,474 Discover Card Execution Note Trust 775,000 9/15/2026 2.500% 3 14,555 0.58% 4,541 Municipal Securities
California St 2,310,000 10/1/2023 5.440% 0 11,009 3.62% 83,939 Maryland St 620,000 8/1/2024 5.440% 1 3,496 0.52% 3,215 California State University 600,000 11/1/2024 5.590% 1 5,517 0.68% 4,121 State Of California 100,000 12/1/2024 5.360% 1 798 0.56% 562 University Of California 510,000 5/15/2025 4.750% 2 8,452 0.88% 4,516 University Of California 220,000 5/15/2025 4.750% 2 3,330 0.81% 1,779 Florida State Board of Administration Finance 1,295,000 7/1/2025 5.170% 2 32,674 1.26% 16,337 Florida State Board of Administration Finance 505,000 7/1/2025 5.170% 2 11,203 1.11% 5,602 Los Angeles Community College District 925,000 8/1/2025 4.950% 2 14,948 0.77% 7,170 New Jersey Turnpike Authority 505,000 1/1/2026 4.740% 3 13,270 1.05% 5,302 Supranational Securities
Intl Bank Of Reconstruction And Dev 1,790,000 11/24/2023 5.360% 0 2,322 2.61% 46,901 Inter-American Development Bank 4,095,000 9/23/2024 5.400% 1 26,559 0.52% 21,553 Overnight Investments 47,969,833 Varies Varies 5.07% 2,440,403 Totals (Main Portfolio) 456,813,645 23,581,598 2.73% 12,498,266 Notes:

1. Earnings projections are based on stated par value, future market expectations and current investment positions.

2. Earnings on overnight investments are based on the investment balances and the Fed Funds Futures rates.

3. Callable securities priced above par are considered to be called on their next call date. #15..
- 1104 -
Attachment 5
Issue Name / Type Trustee Bank Investment Total Amount Fair Market Value Difference
1993 Community Center Refinancing U.S. Bank First American Treasury Obligation Fund $1,699,498.17 $1,699,498.17 $0.00 1993 Golf Course Refinancing U.S. Bank First American Treasury Obligation Fund $506,709.28 $506,709.28 $0.00 Instl Res Tre and Agny Cash Adv6541 $253,321.38 $253,321.38 $0.00 Financial Guaranty Insurance Pol $1.00 $1.00 $0.00
CAMP $2,004,289.51 $2,004,289.51 $0.00
Total $2,257,611.89 $2,257,611.89 $0.00
Instl Res Tre and Agny Cash Adv6541 $252,139.92 $252,139.92 $0.00 CAMP $4,958,387.62 $4,958,387.62 $0.00
Total $5,210,527.54 $5,210,527.54 $0.00
2018 Wastewater Refunding Bank of New York Fidelity Inv MM Trsy Only $697.89 $697.89 $0.00 Fairview Village Refunding US Bank First American Government $198,752.07 $198,752.07 $0.00 Blackrock Federal Fund Instl 30 $536,307.30 $536,307.30 $0.00 CAMP $2,838,811.47 $2,838,963.79 $152.32
Total $3,375,118.77 $3,375,271.09 $152.32
Other Post Employment Benefits Section 115
Trust PARS HighMark Plus Moderate $1,481,519.05 $1,481,519.05 $0.00 Pension Section 115 Trust PARS HighMark Plus Moderately Conservative $2,617,046.41 $2,617,046.41 $0.00 Athens Administrators (New Third Party
Administrator - Worker's Compensation) Wells Fargo Bank Business Checking Account $699,542.55 $699,542.55 $0.00 George Hills Company - General Liability Claims
Administration Services California Bank & Trust Business Checking Account $51,268.53 $51,268.53 $0.00 Kemper Sports Management Inc. BMO Harris Bank Business Money Market $44,368.58 $44,368.58 $0.00 Stanislaus Community Foundation Modesto Commerce Bank Charles Schwab $733,784.48 $733,784.48 $0.00 California Bank of
Commerce $3,428,519.97 $3,428,519.97 $0.00
Columbia Bank $441,033.76 $441,033.76 $0.00
Banner Bank $19,282.55 $19,282.55 $0.00
Umpqua Bank $32,128.57 $32,128.57 $0.00
Village One #2 Refunding Bank of New York
Third-Party Construction Contract Retention
Cash with Fiscal Agent Investments
As of June 30, 2023
2008 Water Refunding COP Bank of New York
2008 Lease Revenue Bonds Bank of New York
#15..
- 1105 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

August 21, 2023
July 20, 2023
TO: Finance Committee
David Wright, Chair
Rosa Escutia-Braaton, Vice-Chair
Nick Bavaro, Member
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: Bill Sandhu, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc to complete assigned work and to gain regulatory compliance for the Carpenter Road landfill
CONTACT: Rosene Nguyen, Integrated Waste Manager [email protected], 209-577-5453
DESCRIPTION:

Consider an Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc., of Folsom, CA to complete assigned work and to gain regulatory compliance for the Carpenter Road Landfill, Modesto, California for a total amount not to exceed $271,700 over a five-year period and forwarding to Council for approval. (Funding Source: Carpenter Road Landfill)
STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

The recommended action supports the City’s Strategic Plan Area of Focus: Quality of Life, “Engage partners across the community to ensure the safety, resilience, and attractiveness of Modesto”, Goal A: “Improve community safety and quality of life through a combination of prevention and intervention efforts that address safety and its underlying issues”, Strategy 6:

Motivate and encourage staff and community members to identify and mitigate blight issues; and Goal B: “Increase pride in Modesto’s diverse neighborhoods and business districts through beautification efforts and by investing in community assets and amenities”, Strategy 3: Evaluate current waste removal and city beautification policies and procedures.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Modesto owned and operated the Carpenter Rd Landfill from 1956-1968. It was a pre-Subtitle D landfill which means there was never a liner put in, or gas and leachate control systems. The landfill size is thirty-nine acres and is split into two areas, east and west, bordering Carpenter Road. The City has ensured post closure monitoring of water and gas wells, as well as general maintenance as required under State law. In the mid-2000’s there was a spike in one methane gas well, as well as a release of VOC (Volatile Organic Compound). The Regional #16..
- 1106 -
Finance Committee, August 21, 2023
Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc to complete assigned work and to gain regulatory compliance for the Carpenter Road landfill

Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) asked the City to provide a Mitigation and Monitoring Plan, as well as a Corrective Action Plan.

In 2015 the Water Board issued a Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) to the City based on their approval of the Correction Action Plan. The City agreed to clean close the east fill and move all the waste to the west fill. The idea behind this would be that all the waste would be contained in one area on the west side and a culvert and pipe would be placed to capture water runoff that would drain into a clean retention basin on the east side. The Water Board accepted this plan. City conducted an initial study for a mitigated negative declaration and all agencies that were required to be notified were notified. Construction was planned to start in 2016/2017 but due to a significantly wet weather season it was delayed a year.

The City then went out to bid in 2018 and on August 14, 2018, by Resolution No. 2018-345 Council awarded the contract to Pacific States Environmental Contractors, Inc. of Dublin, CA.

Construction began in 2018 and by August 2020, observable waste, and impacted soil from the Eastern Waste Management Unit (WMU) was removed and consolidated into the Western WMU, and a new soil cover was installed atop the Western WMU. A stormwater retention basin was constructed in the former Eastern WMU location, and documents were submitted to the Water Board regarding closure. The Water Board contends that the documents are not complete, and subsequent submittal of additional information did not completely satisfy the requirements of the CAO. The Water Board has provided notice that the City remains noncompliant with the CAO and that it may be subject to significant civil penalties until the delinquent reports are resolved.

DISCUSSION:

On March 16, 2022, County of San Luis Obispo issued Request for Proposals (RFP) PS-#1665 for Engineering Services for The Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities on the County website. On April 6, 2022, proposals were conducted electronically through the County’s Purchasing website. Three (3) proposals were received and based on the County of San Luis Obispo Review Committee and criteria outlines in the RFP, one (1) contract was awarded to HDR Engineering, Inc.

Modesto Municipal Code Section 8-3.203 generally requires all purchases, which meet or exceed $50,000 for material, equipment, or contractual services to be formally bid. However, exceptions to the formal bidding process are granted in MMC 8-3.204(d) “Where the Purchasing Manager, in his or her discretion, determines that a process other than the formal bid procedure set for in Section 8-3.203 will result in procurement for the City at the lowest possible cost commensurate with the desired quality.” In addition, MMC 8-3.202(h) encourages the Purchasing Manager to join with the State of California and other units of government in cooperative purchasing plans when the best cost savings interest of the City would be served.

Both requirements were met based on the Competitive Bidding Process selected by County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS-#1665 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities.

HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) Reviewed the existing notice of violations received from the Water Board and the design and reporting documents provided by the City. The tasks listed below will address the Water Board’s requested work and to ensure compliance. #16..
- 1107 -
Finance Committee, August 21, 2023
Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc to complete assigned work and to gain regulatory compliance for the Carpenter Road landfill

Phase 1
Task 100 Project Management
Task 200 Site Reconnaissance and Kickoff Meeting
Task 300 Cover Completion Confirmation Work Plan
Task 400 Stormwater Repair and Protection Work Plan
Task 500 Residual Waste Removal Work Plan
Task 600 Clean Closure Results Discussion
Task 700 Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (PCMP)
FISCAL IMPACT:

The anticipated cost of $271,700 will be absorbed within the current Public Works Department, Solid Waste Division Carpenter Road Landfill Fund 4893-56016-53300 Fiscal Year 2023-24 operating budget.

Anticipated Agreement Expenditures
Task Deliverable Fee
Task 100 Project Management $27,000
Task 200 Site Reconnaissance and Kickoff Meeting $37,000 Task 300 Cover Completion Confirmation Work Plan $81,800 Task 400 Stormwater Repair and Protection Work Plan $23,800 Task 500 Residual Waste Removal Work Plan $51,200
Task 600 Clean Closure Results Discussion $17,500
Task 700 Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (PCMP) $33,400
TOTAL $271,700
RECOMMENDED COMMITTEE ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Motion recommending the Award of Proposal and Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc., of Folsom, CA to complete assigned work and to gain regulatory compliance for the Carpenter Road Landfill located off of Carpenter Road and Robertson Road, Modesto, California for a total amount not to exceed $271,700 over a five-year period and forwarding to Council for approval. #16..
- 1108 -
Finance Committee, August 21, 2023
Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc to complete assigned work and to gain regulatory compliance for the Carpenter Road landfill

Approved by:

Bill Sandhu, Public Works Director
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Agreement

2. Exhibit A – HDR Proposal

3. Exhibit B HDR price schedule within the proposal

4. Costing/Scoring Abstract

5. RFP 1665 Los Osos

6. HDR PS-1665
#16..
- 1109 -
1 AGREEMENT FOR CARPENTER ROAD LANDFILL CLOSURE PHASE I

REGULATORY ASSISTANCE FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
AGREEMENT #253660
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into in the City of Modesto, State of California, this _______day of , 2023, (“Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City", and HDR Engineering, Inc, a Nebraska corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".

This Agreement is made with regard to the following recitals:

A. The City has determined that regulatory compliance should be prepared for the City for Carpenter Road Landfill Closure Phase I for City Solid Waste Collection Services.

B. Consultant represents that it is qualified, willing and able to provide the services to prepare said document(s).

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of this Agreement, and the mutual promises, covenants, and stipulations hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES.

Consultant shall undertake and complete the scope of work as set forth and described in the documents attached hereto and referred to as Exhibit "A" or "Project".

2. TERM OF AGREEMENT.

This Agreement is effective as of the date first written above and will continue in effect until City's acceptance of and payment for all services authorized by City and performed by Consultant, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of the termination clause in this Agreement.

City hereby gives Consultant notice to proceed with the preparation of the Project, as of the Effective Date of this agreement. Consultant shall diligently proceed with the completion of the Project within the time period set forth in Exhibit “A".
#16..
- 1110 -
2 3. COMPENSATION.

Consultant agrees to accept a sum not to exceed $271,700 as full remuneration for performing all services and furnishing all staffing and materials in accordance with Exhibit "A", except those additional services may be compensated as described below.

The Compensation shall be paid pursuant in the manner and at the times set forth below:

City shall pay Consultant on a time and materials basis for Consultant’s actual costs for all work called for in Exhibit “A” to this Agreement. All work to be performed under this Agreement shall be billed on a lump sum basis for percent completion on each of the tasks set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto.

Consultant shall submit invoices as the task are complete to City which include detailed tasks, hours worked, and billable rates for all work completed, and detailed receipts for any reimbursable expenses paid by Consultant and identified in Exhibit “B” or approved by the City in writing.

City shall pay Consultant “Net 45 Days via manual check”. City shall pay all undisputed amounts within 45 days following receipt of the Consultant’s invoice.

Additional services may be authorized by the City Manager in an amount up to, but not to exceed 10% of the agreed maximum compensation, or $298,870. In the event that additional services are deemed necessary, the Consultant shall provide a written request to the Department Manager indicating the reason for additional work, scope and cost of such work. The Department Manager shall provide a written response to the request, either approving or denying the additional expenditure. If additional services are requested and approved, they will be billed at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit “B” and may not exceed the amount requested and approved in writing by the City Manager. In that event, the new total compensation shall not exceed $298,870. If additional services in excess of this amount are deemed necessary by City Staff, an amendment to this Agreement will be required and must be approved prior to commencing the work.

4. OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT.

Throughout the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall possess, or secure all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals legally required to conduct business. Consultant warrants that it has all of #16..
- 1111 -
3 the necessary professional capabilities and experience, as well as all tools, instrumentalities, facilities and other resources necessary to provide the City with the services contemplated by this Agreement. Consultant further represents that it will follow the current, generally accepted and professional practices to make findings, render opinions, prepare factual presentations, and provide professional advice and recommendations regarding this project.

5. PERFORMANCE BY KEY EMPLOYEE.

Consultant has represented to City that Jeffrey S. Murray will be the person primarily responsible for the performance of the services referred to in this Agreement. City has entered into this Agreement in reliance on that representation by Consultant. Consultant therefore agrees that 10% percent or more of the time to be devoted to the project that is the subject of this Agreement will be that of the abovenamed person.

6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS/TITLE TO DATA.

Ownership of Documents
All reports, drawings, designs, graphics, working papers and other incidental work or materials furnished hereunder shall become and remain the property of the City, and may be used by City as it may require without any additional cost to City. However, any modification or reuse of such documents for purposes other than those intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk and without liability to the Consultant. No reports shall be used by the Consultant for purposes other than this contract without the express prior written consent of City.

Title to Data
If, as a part of the agreement, Consultant is required to produce data such as, but not limited to, drawings, plans, specifications, calculations, models, flow diagrams, visual aids and other related materials, the originals of all such data generated under this agreement will be delivered to City upon the completion or termination of services under the contract. It is understood and agreed that the documents and #16..
- 1112 -
4 other materials, including but not limited to those described above, prepared pursuant to this Agreement are prepared specifically for the City and are not necessarily suitable for any future or other use.

All materials, documents, data or information obtained from the City data files or any City medium furnished to Consultant in the performance of this Agreement will at all times remain the property of the City. Any modification or reuse of such data or information for purposes other than those intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant. Such data or information may not be used or copied for direct or indirect use by Consultant after termination of this Agreement without written consent of the City.

7. NEWS AND INFORMATION RELEASE.

Consultant agrees that it will not issue any news releases in connection with either the award of this Agreement, or any subsequent amendment of or efforts under this Agreement, without first obtaining review and approval of said news releases from the City Manager.

8. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

Consultant warrants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would create a “conflict of interest”, as that term is defined in the Political Reform Act (Gov. Code § 81000 et seq), for the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant warrants that, in performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not employ any person having any such interest. Consultant understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code § 1090 et seq., the entire Agreement is void and Consultant will not be entitled to any compensation for services performed. Consultant agrees to file a Statement of Economic Interests with the City Clerk at the start and end of this contract if so, required at the option of City.

9. AMENDMENTS.

This Agreement, including the Exhibits attached hereto, may be amended by written agreement of the parties. City will not be responsible to pay any charges Consultant may incur in performing services not identified in Exhibit ‘A’ unless first authorized by the City in writing.

10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
#16..
- 1113 -
5 All acts of Consultant, its agents, officers, and employees and all others acting on behalf of Consultant relating to the performance of this Agreement, shall be performed as independent contractors and not as agents, officers, or employees of City. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of City. Consultant has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City. It is understood by both Consultant and City that this Agreement shall not under any circumstances be construed or considered to create an employer-employee relationship or a joint venture. Consultant, its agents, officers and employees are and, at all times during the terms of this Agreement, shall represent and conduct themselves as independent contractors and not as employees of City.

Consultant shall determine and control the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement, and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's control with respect to the physical action or activities of the Consultant in fulfillment of this Agreement. Consultant is permitted to provide services to others during the same period service is provided to City under this Agreement. If necessary, Consultant has the responsibility for employing other persons or firms to assist Consultant in fulfilling the terms and obligations under this Agreement.

If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Consultant, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. All terms of employment including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging or any other term of employment or requirement of law shall be determined by the Consultant.

It is understood and agreed that as an independent contractor and not an employee of City neither the Consultant or Consultant's assigned personnel shall have any entitlement as a City employee, right to act on behalf of the City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, or to bind the City to any obligation #16..
- 1114 -
6 whatsoever. It is further understood and agreed that Consultant must issue W-2 forms or other forms as required by law for income and employment tax purposes for all of Consultant's personnel.

11. ASSIGNMENT.

Neither this Agreement nor any portion thereof shall be subcontracted or assigned, other than noted in Exhibit ‘A’, without the express prior written consent of the City in each and every instance.

12. PATENT/COPYRIGHT MATERIALS.

Unless otherwise expressly provided in the contract, Consultant shall be solely responsible for obtaining the right to use any patented or copyrighted materials in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall furnish a warranty of such right to use to City at the request of City.

13. NOTICES.

Notice required by this Agreement shall be given in writing and shall be deemed given and effective upon delivery provided that such are delivered in accordance with the provisions of this Section.

Notices shall be delivered either by: (a) personal delivery; (b) overnight courier service which obtains confirmation of delivery; or (c) certified mail, return receipt requested, if delivery is confirmed by a return receipt; or (d) by electronic transmission subject to reasonable proof that the notice was both transmitted and received. Each such notice shall be sent to the parties at the address respectively set forth below or to such other address as a party may designate by written notice given in accordance with the provisions of this Section:

FOR CONSULTANT: Name: HDR Engineering, Inc
Address: 2365 Iron Point Road, Suite 300
Folsom, CA 95630-8709
Attention: Christina M. Keithley
Phone: (916) 221-1846
Email: [email protected]
FOR CITY: Name: City of Modesto
Address: P.O. Box 642
Modesto, CA 95353
Attention: Rosene Nguyen
Phone: (209) 577-5453
Email: [email protected]
#16..
- 1115 -
7 14. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.

The Consultant shall provide at its own expense and maintain at all times the following insurance with insurance companies licensed in the State of California and shall provide a certificate of insurance as evidence of such insurance to the City. The certificates thereof shall provide that, thirty (30) days prior to cancellation or material change in the policy, notices of same shall be given to the Risk Manager of the City by certified mail, return receipt requested, for all of the following stated insurance policies.

In the event the certificates of insurance required hereunder do not provide for notice of cancellation to the certificate holder and/or additional insureds, the Consultant shall provide, and shall require its subcontractors to provide, as an express condition precedent to payment hereunder, an endorsement from their insurers providing that the additional insureds identified herein shall be provided 30 days’ notice of the cancellation on the policies of insurance required hereunder (10 days’ notice if the policies are cancelled for non-payment of premium). In addition, the named insured on all such policies shall provide to the additional insureds identified herein any notices of cancellation of said insurance policies within 5 business days of receipt of such notice. The Consultant shall, as a further express condition precedent to payment for work performed, affirm under penalty of perjury that the required insurance on the project remains in place and said insurance has not been cancelled.
(a) Worker's Compensation - in compliance with the statutes of the State of California, plus employer's liability with a minimum limit of liability of $1,000,000. (b) General Liability insurance with a minimum limit of liability per occurrence of $1,000,000 for bodily injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. This insurance shall indicate on the certificate of insurance the following coverages and indicate the policy aggregate limit applying to premises and operations; broad form contractual; independent consultants and subcontractors; products and completed operations as applicable.
#16..
- 1116 -
8 (c) Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum limit of liability per occurrence of $1,000,000 for bodily injury and property damage. This insurance shall cover any automobile for bodily injury and property damage.
(d) Professional Liability insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000 per claim and policy aggregate. If coverage is on a claim made basis it shall be maintained for at least three (3) years following completion of the work.

Upon failure of the Consultant to furnish, deliver or maintain such insurance and certificates as above provided, this Agreement, at the election of the City, may be forthwith declared suspended or terminated. Failure of the Consultant to obtain and/or maintain any required insurance shall not relieve the Consultant from any liability under this Agreement, nor shall the insurance requirements be construed to conflict with or otherwise limit the obligations of the Consultant concerning indemnification. The City, its agents, officers, employees, and volunteers shall be named as an additional insured on all insurance policies required herein, except Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability. The Workers' Compensation insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its agents, officers, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by Consultant for the City. The Consultant's insurance policy(ies) shall include a provision that the coverage is primary as respects the City; shall include no special limitations to coverage provided to additional insured; and, shall be placed with insurer(s) with acceptable Best's rating of A:VII or with approval of the Risk Manager. The Consultant must deliver certificates evidencing existence of the insurance listed above to the City prior to the time the contract is signed.

CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with separate endorsements evidencing proof of the CITY’s additional insured status as to both the general liability and automobile liability insurance policies. In addition, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with a Workers Compensation subrogation waiver by way of a separate endorsement. All endorsements referenced above must include the applicable policy number.

For any claims related to this project, the CONSULTANT’S insurance coverage shall be #16..
- 1117 -
9 primary insurance as respects the Entity, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Entity, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the CONSULTANT’S insurance and shall not contribute with it.

15. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.

Termination for Default
In the event either party fails to perform under this AGREEMENT or breaches any condition contained herein, the other party shall notify in writing the breaching party of the non-performance.

Within 10 days after receipt of notification, the breaching party shall correct any non-performance to the reasonable satisfaction of the non-breaching party, or such other time as may be identified in the notice. Failure to correct any non-performance shall allow the non-breaching party to terminate this AGREEMENT for cause.

Termination by City for Convenience
City may cancel this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon written notification to Consultant.

Post-Termination Procedure
Upon receipt of a written notice of termination, the Consultant shall:
a. Cease its work as directed in the notice of termination as of the termination date and see to it that its employees, subconsultants and agents are notified of such termination and act as specified in the notice of termination; b. Terminate all orders and Subcontractors except as necessary to complete any portion of the Work that is not terminated;
c. If directed in writing by the City to do so, assign all right, title and interest in subcontracts and materials in progress to City, in which case the City will have the right at its discretion to settle, or pay any or all claims arising out of the termination of such subconsultants, but in no event shall recovery by any #16..
- 1118 -
10 Consultant or subconsultant include lost profits for portions of the Work not completed or undertaken, including materials not delivered; d. Deliver or otherwise make available to the City all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and material as may have been accumulated by the Consultant in performing the Work whether completed or in process;
e. Settle outstanding liabilities and claims, subject to the approval of City; f. Complete performance of such part of the Project as has not been terminated; g. Take such other actions as may be necessary, or as may be directed by the City for the protection and preservation of the Project and/or property related to the Project;
h. If City so requests, and at City's cost, Consultant shall provide sufficient oral or written status reports to make City reasonably aware of the status of Consultant's work on the project.
i. The Consultant understands and agrees that City may, acting reasonably and in good faith,, refuse to pay Consultant for that portion of Consultant's services which were performed by Consultant on the project prior to the termination date and which remain unacceptable and/or not useful to City as of the termination date.

City will pay Consultant for work actually completed prior to the receipt of the termination notice or otherwise completed in accordance with the notice of termination. The final payment to the Consultant after termination for convenience shall be limited to amounts due and owing under the Agreement at time of termination, including the following:
a. The cost of settling and paying valid claims arising out of the termination of the Work such as subconsultant agreements or contracts for materials; #16..
- 1119 -
11 b. The Agreement price allocable to the portion of the Work properly performed or goods supplied to the work site by the Consultant as of the date of termination, as determined in accordance with the notice of termination, reduced by any sums previously paid to the Consultant.

16. INDEMNITY.

The Consultant shall hold the City, its agents, officers, employees, and volunteers, harmless from and save, defend and indemnify them against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, judgments or damages from every cause, including but not limited to injury to person or property or wrongful death, including reasonable costs and expenses of defense of any judicial or administrative action, to the extent arising out of any negligent or wrongful act or omission of Consultant, or its agents, officers, employees, or volunteers relating to or during the performance of its obligations under this Agreement.

Consultant's obligation to defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its agents, officers, and employees harmless under the provisions of this paragraph is not limited to or restricted by any requirement in this Agreement for Consultant to procure and maintain a policy of insurance.

In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

17. DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

Venue for all claims, controversies, or disputes arising out of, or relating to the formation of this Agreement, or the breach, termination execution, enforcement, interpretation, or validity of this Agreement, including the determination of the scope or applicability of this contract provision shall be in the Superior Court of Stanislaus County or the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. #16..
- 1120 -
12 18. ATTORNEYS’ FEES.

If a party to this AGREEMENT brings any action, including an action for declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provision of this AGREEMENT, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose.

19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

This Agreement and its exhibits contain the entire understanding between Consultant and City. All previous proposals, offers and communications relative to this Agreement, whether oral or written, are hereby superseded except to the extent that they have been incorporated into this Agreement.

20. PARTIAL INVALIDITY.

If any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

21. WAIVER.

The waiver by any party to this Agreement of a breach of any provision hereof shall be in writing and shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any other or subsequent breach hereof unless specifically stated in writing.

22. AUDIT.

The City's duly authorized representative shall have access at all reasonable times to all reports, contract records, contract documents, contract files, and personnel necessary to audit and verify Consultant's charges to City under this Agreement.

Consultant agrees to retain reports, records, documents, and files related to charges under this Agreement for a period of four (4) years following the date of final payment for Consultant services. City's representative shall have the right to reproduce any of the aforesaid documents.

23. GOVERNING LAW.
#16..
- 1121 -
13 This Agreement shall be governed according to the laws of the State of California.

24. HEADINGS NOT CONTROLLING.

Headings used in the Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered in construing this Agreement.

25. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS.

Consultant shall insure compliance with all safety and hourly requirements for employees, in accordance with federal, state, and county safety and health regulations and laws. Consultant shall fully comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations and permits.

26. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE.

Consultant will have a City of Modesto business license. #16..
- 1122 -
14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Modesto, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement by its City Manager and attestation by its City Clerk under authority of Resolution No. 2023- , adopted by the Council of the City of Modesto on the day of , 2023, and HDR Engineering, Inc has caused this agreement to be duly executed in duplicate as of the Effective Date. ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// #16..
- 1123 -

EXHIBIT A
April 3, 2023
Ms. Rosene Salmo
City of Modesto
Department of Public Works
PO Box 642
Modesto, CA 95353
RE: Carpenter Road Landfill Closure Phase 1 Regulatory Assistance Dear Ms. Salmo,
HDR is pleased to present to the City of Modesto, California (City), this scope of services to help gain regulatory compliance for the Carpenter Road Landfill that was closed in 2022. The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) has notified the City that several items remain outstanding regarding the certification for the closure construction and that the City is not in compliance with the Water Board’s Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) R5-2015-0700.
hdrinc.com
The City has requested assistance from HDR to resolve the non-compliance in a phased approach, with this first phase including investigations and developing repair and work plans and post closure monitoring plans. The scope of the second phase of the project would be developed following Phase 1 services and would include implementation of proposed closure system repair, construction engineering services and issuing the final report.

1.0 Background
The City owns and maintains the former Carpenter Road Landfill, regulated by the Water Board. The landfill site is approximately four miles southwest of the City along Carpenter Road, immediately north of the Tuolumne River. The landfill formerly included two individual unlined waste management units (WMUs), the Eastern WMU and the Western WMU, split geographically by Carpenter Road.

In 2015, the Water Board issued CAO R5-2015-0700 requiring that the City address landfill impacts on groundwater adjacent to the Tuolumne River and clean close the Eastern WMU by relocating the waste to the Western WMU, install a final cover over the Western WMU, construct a stormwater retention basin, and submit reports that document required CAO work has been completed.

Between August 2019 and March 2021, observable waste and impacted soil from the Eastern WMU was removed and consolidated into the Western WMU, and a new soil cover was installed atop the Western WMU. A stormwater retention basin was constructed in the former Eastern WMU location, and documents were submitted to the Water Board 2365 Iron Point Road Suite 300 Folsom, CA 95630-8709
T (916) 817-4700 F: 916.817.4747
#16..
- 1124 -
regarding closure. The Water Board contends that the documents are not complete, and subsequent submittal of additional information, as recently as January 25, 2023, by others on behalf of the City did not completely satisfy the requirements of the CAO. The Water Board has provided notice that the City remains non-compliant with the CAO and that it may be subject to significant civil penalties until the delinquent reports are resolved.

The Water Board has concluded that available data related to the closure project has been submitted, and no compaction or physical property testing was completed during the installation of the Western WMU cover. The Water Board has requested that site work be completed to verify the closure system was constructed in accordance with the closure design, specifications, and construction quality assurance (CQA) plan and that final revised reports be submitted.

2.0 Scope of Services
For the scope of services, we have reviewed the existing communication from the Water Board and the design and reporting documents provided by the City. The scope and deliverables presented herein address the Water Board’s requested work.

Task 100 Project Management
Throughout the execution of the various tasks described in this scope of services, HDR will support the task-specific activities by coordinating team members, meetings, communication, reporting, and quality controls. This task has been established in recognition that these activities transcend the individual tasks; are required for effective project execution; may require flexibility in timing, extent, and response to project needs; and cannot always be precisely predicted or assigned to an individual activity.

This task includes communication between the City and HDR; planning, organizing, and monitoring project team activities; attending meetings, as requested; responding to specific requests not specifically addressed in the scope; and preparing and updating project schedules.

Overall coordination includes the following:
 Identify key personnel and their roles.
 Manage and allocate resources based on project schedules and activities.  Coordinate production.
 Prepare and update overall project schedules.
 Coordinate activities affecting HDR’s services.
 Develop internal guidance documents for HDR personnel to define key project objectives, activities, constraints, guidelines, and procedures.  Maintain SharePoint, Drop-Box, or a similar cloud-based data exchange site.

Deliverables
 Attendance and presentations at meetings.
#16..
- 1125 -
 Agendas and meeting minutes for meetings, including distribution to meeting attendees.
 Project schedule and schedule updates on a monthly basis.  HDR internal guidance documents and quality control.

Meetings
 Up to six (6) ad-hoc one-hour meetings (virtual) with the City with up two (2) HDR staff.

Key Understandings
 Project update meetings will be held virtually.

Task 200 Site Reconnaissance and Kickoff Meeting
HDR will schedule and facilitate a site reconnaissance and kickoff meeting within two (2) weeks of receiving the notice to proceed. The meeting will cover both technical and administrative project issues with key team members. The site reconnaissance and kickoff meeting will include the following:
 Team member introduction, areas of responsibility, and lines of communication.  Summaries of project scope for each task, schedules, and key issues.  Identification of existing reports and data relevant to the landfill cover system.  Identification of major data gaps.
 Identification of final cover system options. HDR will present and discuss potential options, including pros and cons of each, and will solicit feedback and direction from the City.
 Identification of permitting strategies in moving forward with acceptable cover options.
 Site reconnaissance to be conducted by two (2) senior solid waste staff familiar with landfill closure design and construction, erosion and sediment control, and CQA.

Deliverables
 Draft agenda for site reconnaissance and kickoff meeting.  Draft data needs list.
 Meeting notes, including decisions, action items, and key outcomes from site reconnaissance and kickoff meeting.

Meetings
 Kickoff meeting to be held at the project site with up to two (2) HDR personnel.  One-day site reconnaissance with up to two (2) HDR personnel.

Key Understandings
 The site reconnaissance and kickoff meeting will be held on back-to-back days at the project site. The City will provide a meeting location. #16..
- 1126 -
 The site reconnaissance is intended to evaluate existing site conditions for the development of the plans in Tasks 300, 400, and 500.

Task 300 Cover Completion Confirmation Work Plan
HDR will prepare a Cover Completion Confirmation Work Plan to describe the anticipated field investigative efforts to determine if the existing final cover atop the Western WMU was completed in accordance with the approved 30 March 2016 Closure Plan, Technical Specifications, and CQA-Plan. This Work Plan is anticipated to include, but not be limited to, the following:
 Depth of the soil cover installed.
 Achieved soil compaction based on representative soil properties.  Sample collection methodology to confirm that the soil placed to complete the Western WMU final cover meets the material testing requirements outlined in the Technical Specifications and CQA-Plan.
 Map depicting the location of each proposed confirmation compaction and soil sampling location.
 The number of confirmation testing and sampling locations, which are anticipated to be equal to that required in the Technical Specifications and CQA-Plan, and the proposed sampling locations evenly spaced in a grid pattern across the completed Western WMU cover.
 The following testing that we have assumed would be required as part of the Work Plan based on Table 02222-1 and 02222-2 in the Technical Specifications and Table 5.1 in the CQA-Plan:
o Moisture-density relationship (compaction curve, ASTM D 698).  1 per 1,000 CY installed or 96 tests.
o Particle size analysis (ASTM D 422).
 1 per 5,000 CY installed or 20 tests.
o Soil classification (ASTM D 2487).
 1 per 5,000 CY installed or 20 tests.
o In-place density (ASTM D2922).
 1 per 1,000 CY installed or 96 tests.
o Soil thickness verification by coring.
 1 per 10,000 CY installed or 10 tests.

HDR will prepare a draft Work Plan for City review and comment. HDR will facilitate a review meeting with the City to discuss comments and potential revisions to the draft Work Plan. After the review meeting, HDR will prepare a final Work Plan for submittal to the Water Board.

HDR will prepare one round of comment responses to the Water Board and will revise the Work Plan accordingly.
#16..
- 1127 -
Following submittal of the Work Plan and approval by the Water Board, HDR will execute the Work Plan, prepare a report that summarizes the results of the field investigation, and provide an opinion of whether the constructed closure is in conformance with the applicable design, specifications, and CQA-Plan. For purposes of this scope of services, it is anticipated that repair and/or further final cover construction will be required and will be addressed in Task 700, with construction engineering services and a final revised report addressed in Tasks 800, 900, and 1000.

Deliverables
 Draft Work Plan for City review in Word and PDF format.  Final Work Plan for submittal to Water Board in PDF format.  Response to Water Board comments in PDF format.
 Final Work Plan Report and Conformance Statement submittal to Water Board in PDF format.

Meetings
 One draft Work Plan review meeting (virtual) with up to two (2) HDR personnel.  One review meeting (virtual) with Water Board to discuss Work Plan comments.

Key Understandings
 The City will provide one round of comments on the draft Work Plan consolidated into one comment tracking document.
 Draft and final Work Plan documents will be transmitted to the City electronically in Word and PDF format.
 A budget of $22,000 has been allocated for geotechnical testing in the field and laboratory. Until the initial site reconnaissance is conducted, it is difficult to quantify the total number of field and laboratory tests. If additional geotechnical testing is required, an additional fee may be required.
 Sample collection is based on the closure construction that was completed over an approximate 29.5-acre area and with approximately 95,000 CY of cover soil installed.
 The City will provide a backhoe and operator (or similar equipment) to conduct test pits for soil sample collection to confirm in-place density testing results.  Fee assumes that the proposed testing frequency is generally acceptable to the Water Board.

Task 400 Stormwater Repair and Protection Work Plan
During inspections of the closed landfill, the Water Board identified significant erosion rills on the northern, eastern, and western slopes of Western WMU that have resulted in the exposure of waste materials. Ponding at the toe of slopes was also noted, and erosion was observed in the stormwater basin constructed on the former Eastern WMU. The City is currently working to address the erosion issues at the site.

HDR will prepare a Protection Work Plan to include, but not be limited, to the following:
#16..
- 1128 -
 Complete hydrologic modeling of the constructed closure plan to assess stormwater drainage system and erosion protection requirements and improvements needed.
 Identify improvements to the site’s stormwater drainage system to adequately protect the final cover from erosion during a 100-year, 24-hour precipitation event.  Review and confirm the methods for protection from a 100-year flood event from the Tuolumne River, which, while proposed in the Closure Plan, was not constructed.

HDR will prepare a draft Work Plan for City review and comment. HDR will facilitate a review meeting with the City to discuss comments and potential revisions to the draft Work Plan. After the review meeting, HDR will prepare a final Work Plan for submittal to the Water Board.

HDR will prepare one round of comment responses to the Water Board and will revise the Work Plan accordingly.

Following submittal of the Work Plan and approval by the Water Board, HDR will incorporate repair techniques/methods into the design documents in Task 700. For purposes of this scope of services, it is anticipated that repair and/or further construction will be required.

Deliverables
 Draft Work Plan for City review in Word and PDF format.  Final Work Plan for submittal to Water Board in PDF format.  Response to Water Board comments in PDF format.
 Final Work Plan Report and Conformance Statement submittal to Water Board in PDF format.

Meetings
 One draft Work Plan review meeting (virtual) with up to two (2) HDR personnel.  One review meeting (virtual) with Water Board to discuss Work Plan comments.

Key Understandings
 The City will provide one round of comments on the draft Work Plan consolidated into one comment tracking document.
 Draft and final Work Plan documents will be transmitted to the City electronically in Word and PDF format.
 Stormwater calculations will be prepared to address a 100-year, 24-hour precipitation event.

Task 500 Residual Waste Removal Work Plan
HDR will prepare a Residual Waste Removal Work Plan to determine the extent of potential residual waste associated with the Western WMU that was identified beyond the property boundary along the northern bank of the Tuolumne River and not incorporated #16..
- 1129 -
into the closure. The Work Plan will also identify the regulatory agencies to be coordinated with to gain approval for the proposed scope of work along the banks of the Tuolumne River in determining the extent of residual waste.

HDR will prepare a draft Work Plan for City review and comment. HDR will facilitate a review meeting with the City to discuss comments and potential revisions to the draft Work Plan. After the review meeting, HDR will prepare a final Work Plan for submittal to the appropriate regulatory agencies.

HDR will prepare one round of comment responses for up to three (3) regulatory agencies and will revise the Work Plan accordingly.

Following submittal of the Work Plan and approval by the regulatory agencies, HDR will execute the field investigation to identify residual waste extent and incorporate removal and restoration techniques/methods into the design documents in Task 700. For purposes of this scope of services, it is anticipated that additional removal will be required.

Deliverables
 Draft Work Plan for City review in Word and PDF format.  Final Work Plan for submittal to regulatory agencies in PDF format.  Response to regulatory agency comments in PDF format.  Final Work Plan submittal to regulatory agencies in PDF format.

Meetings
 One draft Work Plan review meeting (virtual) with up to two (2) HDR personnel.  One review meeting (virtual) with up to three (3) regulatory agencies to discuss Work Plan comments.

Key Understandings
 The City will provide one round of comments on the draft Work Plan consolidated into one comment tracking document.
 Draft and final Work Plan documents will be transmitted to the City electronically in Word and PDF format.
 The City will provide a backhoe and operator (or similar equipment) for excavating test pits to determine residual waste extent.
 Floodplain permitting is not anticipated to be required and not included in this scope of services.
 Coordination may be required with the US Army Corp of Engineers and the Federal Emergency Management Agency regarding floodplain and floodway encroachment. A letter of map revision and/or a conditional letter of map revision is not included.

Task 600 Clean Closure Results Discussion
HDR will prepare a results discussion memorandum for the completed Eastern WMU excavation. This memorandum will document and discuss in detail work related to the #16..
- 1130 -
Eastern WMU excavation, including completed background and excavation sampling, and will contain results and recommendations regarding the clean closure of the former Eastern WMU in accordance with Sections 20380(d), 21090(f), and 21810(e) of Title 27.

This discussion memorandum will be completed as a separate report. We understand that waste and soil materials were excavated and relocated and that soil samples were collected from the base and sidewalls of the excavation and analyzed for total threshold limit concentrations and soluble limit threshold concentrations. We also understand that some of the soil remaining after excavation was still above background threshold values and could not be considered “clean” soil.

Deliverables
 Draft Clean Closure Memorandum for City review in Word and PDF format.  Final Clean Closure Memorandum for submittal to Water Board in PDF format.  Response to Water Board comments in PDF format.

Key Understandings
 The City will provide one round of comments on the draft memorandum.  Draft and final memorandums will be transmitted to the City electronically in Word and PDF format.

Task 700 Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (PCMP)
HDR will prepare a Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (PCMP) in accordance with Section 21769 of Title 27. The PCMP is required to provide a basis to establish an accurate detailed cost estimate certified for accuracy by a registered civil engineer or certified engineering geologist, enable the Water Board to assess the reasonableness of the cost estimate, and provide a detailed plan for the inspection, maintenance, and monitoring of the landfill during the post-closure maintenance period. The final PCMP shall include the following information:
 Emergency response plan as required by § 21130 of Chapter 3, Subchapter 5.  Persons or companies responsible for each aspect of post-closure maintenance, and their addresses and telephone numbers.
 Description of the planned uses of the property during the post-closure maintenance period in accordance with § 21190 of Chapter 3, Subchapter 5.  As-built description of the current monitoring and control systems at the landfill, including a detailed description of proposed changes to be implemented as part of closure. This description shall be kept current throughout the post-closure maintenance period.
 Detailed description of the methods, procedures, and processes that will be used to maintain, monitor, and inspect the closed landfill during the post-closure maintenance period to comply with § 21180 of Chapter 3, Subchapter 5.  Operations and maintenance plan for the gas control system, as applicable. #16..
- 1131 -
 Summary of the requirements for reporting the results of monitoring and collection, pursuant to section § 21180 of Chapter 3, Subchapter 5.  Post-closure maintenance cost estimates pursuant to §§ 21815 and 21840.

HDR will prepare a draft PCMP for City review and comment. HDR will facilitate a review meeting with the City to discuss comments and potential revisions to the draft PCMP. After the review meeting, HDR will prepare a final PCMP for submittal to the Water Board.

HDR will prepare one round of comment responses to the Water Board and will revise the PCMP accordingly.

Deliverables
 Draft PCMP for City review in Word and PDF format.
 Final PCMP for submittal to Water Board in PDF format.  Response to Water Board comments in PDF format.

Meetings
 One draft PCMP review meeting (virtual) with up to two (2) HDR personnel.  One review meeting (virtual) with Water Board to discuss PCMP comments.

Key Understandings
 Preparation of the PCMP would not preclude HDR from performing these services to the City under a subsequent solicitation and agreement.

3.0 Period of Service
HDR proposes to complete the above scope of services within 120 calendar days of receiving a notice to proceed and in general conformance with the preliminary schedule outlined below:

Task Deliverable Start
(Days)
Complete
(Days)
Task 100 Project Management 0 120
Task 200 Site Reconnaissance and Kickoff Meeting 0 30
Task 300 Cover Completion Confirmation Work Plan 15 90
Task 400 Stormwater Repair and Protection Work Plan 15 60 Task 500 Residual Waste Removal Work Plan 30 120
Task 600 Clean Closure Results Discussion 30 90
Task 700 Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (PCMP) 90 120
#16..
- 1132 -

4.0 Compensation
HDR proposes a not-to-exceed fee of $271,700 for the above Phase 1 scope of services. It is anticipated that the Phase 2 Scope of services for completion of the closure repair design, construction engineering, and final report would be negotiated following completion of the Phase 1 work. The Phase 1 work is to be billed on a lump sum basis for percent completion on each of the tasks below:

Task Deliverable Fee
Task 100 Project Management $27,000
Task 200 Site Reconnaissance and Kickoff Meeting $37,000 Task 300 Cover Completion Confirmation Work Plan $81,800 Task 400 Stormwater Repair and Protection Work Plan $23,800 Task 500 Residual Waste Removal Work Plan $51,200
Task 600 Clean Closure Results Discussion $17,500
Task 700 Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (PCMP) $33,400
TOTAL $271,700

5.0 Terms and Conditions
The terms and conditions shall be per the attached HDR Engineering, Inc. Standard Terms and Conditions. It is agreed that HDR Engineering, Inc. is contracted to provide assistance with completion of items necessary to demonstrate that the completed construction was in conformance with the closure design, specifications, and CQA-Plan prepared and administered by others. HDR Engineering, Inc. shall bear no responsibility for the failure of the previously constructed system to meet the project requirements and the requirements of the CAO or have any liability for fines issued by the Water Board for non-compliance of the work completed previously or for delays in finalizing required reports.
#16..
- 1133 -
Thank you for this opportunity to present this proposed scope of services. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Jeff Murray at 919-232-6682.

Sincerely,
HDR Engineering, Inc.

Jeffrey S. Murray, PE (NC, VA, LA, DE) Holly Kennedy, PE (CA #74682) Vice President Senior Vice President
#16..
- 1134 -

EXHIBIT B
HDR proposes a not-to-exceed fee of $271,700 for the above Phase 1 scope of services. It is anticipated that the Phase 2 Scope of services for completion of the closure repair design, construction engineering, and final report would be negotiated following completion of the Phase 1 work. The Phase 1 work is to be billed on a lump sum basis for percent completion on each of the tasks below:

Task Deliverable Fee
Task 100 Project Management $27,000
Task 200 Site Reconnaissance and Kickoff Meeting $37,000 Task 300 Cover Completion Confirmation Work Plan $81,800 Task 400 Stormwater Repair and Protection Work Plan $23,800 Task 500 Residual Waste Removal Work Plan $51,200
Task 600 Clean Closure Results Discussion $17,500
Task 700 Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (PCMP) $33,400
TOTAL $271,700
The terms and conditions shall be per the attached HDR Engineering, Inc. Standard Terms and Conditions. It is agreed that HDR Engineering, Inc. is contracted to provide assistance with completion of items necessary to demonstrate that the completed construction was in conformance with the closure design, specifications, and CQA-Plan prepared and administered by others. HDR Engineering, Inc. shall bear no responsibility for the failure of the previously constructed system to meet the project requirements and the requirements of the CAO or have any liability for fines issued by the Water Board for non-compliance of the work completed previously or for delays in finalizing required reports. #16..
- 1135 -
RFP No. RFP PS-#1665 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activies

COMMITTEE SCORING
HDR Engineering Sevices Possible
Points
Evaluator
1 Evaluator
2 Evaluator
3 Total
Evaluation
Understanding of project 20 16 16 20 52
Demonstrated expertise performing
similar work and technical ability 30 30 24 30 84
Qualifications and experience of key staff 30 24 24 24 72 Familiarity with state and federal
regulations and complex
stakeholder/institutional issues
10 8 8 10 26
Consultant team's resources and
availablility to provide services efficiently
and expediently as well as on short
notice/emergency basis
10 8 6 6 20
Total Points Available 100
TOTAL 86 78 90 254
Padre Associates, Inc Possible
Points
Evaluator
1 Evaluator
2 Evaluator
3 Total
Evaluation
Understanding of project 20 20 20 16 56
Demonstrated expertise performing
similar work and technical ability 30 30 24 24 78
Qualifications and experience of key staff 30 24 24 24 72 Familiarity with state and federal
regulations and complex
stakeholder/institutional issues
10 6 8 8 22
Consultant team's resources and
availablility to provide services efficiently
and expediently as well as on short
notice/emergency basis
10 10 10 8 28
Total Points Available 100
TOTAL 90 86 80 256
#16..
- 1136 -
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc Possible
Points
Evaluator
1 Evaluator
2 Evaluator
3 Total
Evaluation
Understanding of project 20 12 16 16 44
Demonstrated expertise performing
similar work and technical ability 30 24 24 18 66
Qualifications and experience of key staff 30 24 24 18 66 Familiarity with state and federal
regulations and complex
stakeholder/institutional issues
10 6 6 6 18
Consultant team's resources and
availablility to provide services efficiently
and expediently as well as on short
notice/emergency basis
10 8 8 8 24
Total Points Available 100
TOTAL 74 78 66 218
#16..
- 1137 -
ctivies
#16..
- 1138 -
#16..
- 1139 -
#16..
- 1140 -

COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

CENTRAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Christopher Lopez Director
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PS- #1665

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE

LOS OSOS LANDFILL POST CLOSURE ACTIVITIES
March 16, 2022
The County of San Luis Obispo (County) is currently soliciting qualifications proposals for professional engineering services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities.

Each proposal shall specify each and every item as set forth in the attached specifications. Any and all exceptions must be clearly stated in the proposal. Failure to set forth any item in the specifications without taking exception may be grounds for rejection. The County reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive any irregularity or informality in any proposal or in the RFP process, as long as, in the judgment of the County, such action will not negate fair competition and will permit proper comparative evaluation of the proposals submitted.

This RFP is posted on the County of San Luis Obispo (County) Purchasing website at http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/GS/Purchasing/Current_Formal_Bids_and_Proposals.htm. Any changes, additions, or deletions to this RFP will be in the form of written addenda issued by the County. Any addenda will be posted on the website. Prospective proposers must check the website for addenda or other relevant new information during the response period. The County is not responsible for the failure of any prospective proposer to receive such addenda. All addenda so issued shall become a part of this RFP.

If your firm is interested and qualified, please submit two (2) separate Adobe Acrobat Portable Data Format (.pdf) files, one (1) technical proposal and one (1) fee schedule through the County’s Purchasing website at the address listed above, by 3:00 p.m. on April 6, 2022.

All questions (requests for interpretations or corrections) pertaining to the content of this RFP must be made in writing through the County’s Purchasing website by 3:00 p.m. on March 30, 2022. Requests submitted after said date may not be considered. Questions will receive a response within five (5) business days. Questions and responses will be posted (anonymously) on the Purchasing website and can be viewed by accessing the RFP. The County/District reserves the right to determine the appropriateness of comments / questions that will be posted on the website.

If you have any questions about the proposal process, please contact the Buyer directly.

Leah St James
Senior Buyer – Central Services Purchasing
[email protected]
#16..
- 1141 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 2 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................3 A. PURPOSE............................................................................................................................................... 3 B. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. SCHEDULE AND SUBMITTAL............................................................................5 A. RFP SCHEDULE .................................................................................................................................... 5 B. QUESTIONS........................................................................................................................................... 5 C. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL ....................................................................................................................... 5 D. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE ......................................................................................................... 5 III. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ................................................................................6 A. COUNTY RIGHTS & OPTIONS.............................................................................................................. 6 B. PREVAILING WAGE............................................................................................................................... 8 C. CHANGES TO THE RFP........................................................................................................................ 9 D. COMMUNICATIONS............................................................................................................................... 9 E. INSURANCE........................................................................................................................................... 9 F. EXCEPTIONS & DEVIATIONS............................................................................................................. 10 G. AWARD AND STANDARD AGREEMENT ........................................................................................... 10 H. PRICING ................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

IV. PROPOSAL FORMAT......................................................................................11 V. PROPOSAL SELECTION & CONTRACT AWARD................................................12 A. SELECTION PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................... 12 B. SELECTION CRITERIA........................................................................................................................ 13 C. FINAL SELECTION............................................................................................................................... 13 D. CONTRACT AWARD AND EXECUTION............................................................................................. 13 E. PROTEST OF AWARD......................................................................................................................... 14 VI. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................. 15 APPENDIX A – PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK AND EXHIBITS A-D .........................16 APPENDIX B – SAMPLE CONTRACT.........................................................................18 APPENDIX C – LOCAL VENDOR PREFERENCE...........................................................19 APPENDIX D – RISK ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE................................................20 APPENDIX E – COUNTY TRAVEL POLICY..................................................................22 APPENDIX F – DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM ...................................23 APPENDIX G – PROPOSER CHECKLIST.....................................................................24 #16..
- 1142 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 3 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities I. INTRODUCTION
A. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Request for Proposal (RFP) is to solicit qualifications from firms to establish a consultant contract for engineering services required for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities (project) to include, but not be limited to, the following:
• Performing broad functions of management of the project including:
o Monitoring activities for post closure maintenance and long-term monitoring pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 27, and in accordance with Waste Discharge Order No. R3-2007-0023
o Monitoring performance of existing remediation systems, which includes the monitoring well network, cap and drainage system, gas collection and flare system, groundwater extraction and treatment system, and any other system appurtenant to post closure activities at the Landfill
o Providing oversight of existing contracted services for required monitoring and reporting activities
o Providing oversight of existing contracted services for required operation and maintenance (O&M) of existing remediation systems
• Planning, modifying, developing, and implementing O&M and corrective maintenance activities as needed to maintain operation and performance of the remediation systems; • Developing and analyzing engineering alternatives for corrective actions to address Cleanup or Abatement Order No. 95-66;
• Providing regulatory and technical guidance, including engagement with regulatory agencies as needed, in response to requests for information, etc.

The engineering consultant will perform all management, administrative, planning, engineering, design, and operational and maintenance services as needed to carryout required post closure activities on behalf of the County to maintain compliance with all State and Federal requirements.

The consultant contract is planned to be an on-call, task-order based contract.

B. BACKGROUND
Summary of Long-Term Corrective Actions
The site of the closed Los Osos Landfill was originally developed as a gravel quarry. Disposal operations began in 1958 and the landfill accepted refuse until 1988, receiving a total of 500,000 tons of wastes. The final closure cap was constructed in 1990, and additional surface water drainage improvements were installed in 1991.

In 1995, the RWQCB issued Corrective Action Order 95-66 to clean-up groundwater impacted by VOCs from the landfill. In 1996, the County performed the cap enhancement project to minimize infiltration of rainwater. The project included adding 1 foot of soil to approximately 2 acres to improve drainage grades, applying herbicide to deep-rooted plants on the landfill cover to reduce penetration of the low permeability soil cover, and upgrading drainage inlets to promote storm water run-off. The County then began construction of the landfill-gas control system to remove #16..
- 1143 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 4 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities VOC-containing landfill gas. The control system’s purpose was to reduce the total mass of VOCs in the landfill and reduce the pressure in the landfill that was driving VOCs toward groundwater.

The landfill-gas control system began operation in September 1998.

In late December 2005, the RWQCB requested submittal of an updated closure and post-closure maintenance plan, recommendations for a revised groundwater monitoring plan, and a discussion of potential and preferred corrective actions for the VOCs identified in groundwater. The updated post-closure maintenance plan and recommendations for a revised groundwater monitoring plan were submitted in June 2006. An engineering feasibility study for corrective action was submitted in November 2006 with recommendations for landfill cover enhancement, continued landfill gas extraction, and bio-enhancement of the aquifer to improve biodegradation of VOCs. A letter from the RWQCB dated September 21, 2007 provided feedback on the June 2006 Post Closure Maintenance Plan and the November 2006 Engineering Feasibility Study. That letter requested updates to the Post Closure Maintenance Plan Update relating to the updated Waste Discharge Requirements and Monitoring and Reporting Program adopted by the RWQCB in May 2007 (Order No. R3-2007-0023). A revised Post Closure Maintenance Plan and Corrective Action Workplan were submitted to the RWQCB on November 15, 2007. As outlined in the Engineering Feasibility Study and Corrective Action Workplan, bio-enhancement was identified as the most effective approach to address VOC concentrations downgradient of MW-2. The field and laboratory investigation for a Bio-enhancement Pilot Study occurred in January 2008 and the results and recommendations were submitted in July 2008. The results of that study indicated that the site would not be suitable for a full-scale bio-enhancement project at the point of compliance. Therefore, we proceeded with the intrinsic remediation plan outlined in our letter to the RWQCB dated July 10, 2008.

Funding was obtained in mid-December 2011 to reevaluate the 2006 engineering feasibility study and the results of the 2008 bio-enhancement pilot study. On March 16, 2012, we submitted Golder’s Corrective Action Assessment Re-Evaluation and Proposed Alternatives to the RWQCB in which they concluded that bio-enhanced remediation at the point of compliance was infeasible because of site topographic and hydrogeologic conditions. Golder recommended re-evaluating groundwater extraction as a means to control contaminant migration at the point of compliance.

In April 2012, the County began evaluating groundwater extraction feasibility and completed groundwater modeling and extraction and treatment system conceptual design in June 2015.

The design includes installation of ten extraction wells spaced equidistance apart along the point of compliance and a granulated activated carbon treatment system to remove volatile organic compounds from groundwater. The design also included a proposal to discharge treated water to Warden Creek through an onsite stormwater retention basin under NPDES General Permit for Highly Treated Groundwater. The County reviewed other options for disposal, however, none were determined feasible.

The Water Board concurred with the extraction and treatment aspects of the design per a letter to the County dated July 21, 2015. And, in 2020, after acquiring adequate budget, the County was able to construct the groundwater extraction and treatment system. The system startup test was run as required on December 3, 2020 and a total of approximately 11,065 gallons of groundwater were processed through the treatment plant, then contained in two connected Baker tanks. Based on the effluent samples obtained from the treatment system, organic compounds were not detected. The treatment plant is removing organic constituents, as intended. No VOCs were detected in the tank sample collected at the end of the test.

However, trace amounts of Mercury, Arsenic, Copper, and Zinc were detected above the limits of the NPDES General Permit for Highly Treated Groundwater, based on the most stringent criteria. #16..
- 1144 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 5 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities These trace amounts are well below drinking water standards and these limits as required in the Order are unattainable as we cannot identify a lab that can attain these required detection limits.

In correspondence dated December 22, 2020, the County requested that the Water Board determine that while we utilize the best available analytical methodology with the best available detection limits that we are in compliance with the permit and may begin operating the pump and treat as planned with discharge to Warden Creek.

After some discussion between County staff and Water Board staff, the Water Board’s stated response was to require additional technology to remove the trace metals from effluent. The pump and treat system is not currently permitted to operate as planned and the Water Board issued a new Order 13267 on June 11, 2021, requiring additional groundwater investigation and water quality requirements. The pump and treat improvements are underway to address Water Board Order 13267, and system readiness is expected in October 2022.

All supporting documents on the Landfill are available in GeoTracker.

II. SCHEDULE AND SUBMITTAL
A. RFP SCHEDULE
The following represents the tentative schedule for this RFP. Any change in the scheduled dates for the Pre-Proposal Conference, Deadline for Final Questions, Proposal Submission Deadline, or Interviews will be advertised in the form of an addendum to this RFP. The schedule for other milestones dates may be adjusted without notice.

RFP Schedule Date
Issued March 16, 2022
Pre-Bid Conference March 23, 2022
Deadline for Final Questions March 30, 2022 at 3:00 p.m.

Proposal Submission Date April 6, 2022 at 3:00 p.m.

Intent to Award Issued April 27, 2022 (tentatively)
Award by Board of Supervisors June 15, 2022 (tentatively) Notice to Proceed June 16, 2022 (tentatively)
B. QUESTIONS
All questions (requests for interpretations or corrections) pertaining to the content of this RFP must be made in writing through the County’s Purchasing website by 3:00 p.m. on March 30, 2022. Requests submitted after said date may not be considered. Questions will receive a response within five (5) business days. Questions and responses will be posted (anonymously) on the Purchasing website and can be viewed by accessing the RFP. The County reserves the right to determine the appropriateness of comments / questions that will be posted on the website.

C. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
If your firm is interested and qualified, please submit two (2) separate Adobe Acrobat #16..
- 1145 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 6 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities Portable Data Format (.pdf) files, one (1) technical proposal and one (1) rate sheet, through the County’s Purchasing website at the address listed on the title page by 3:00 p.m. on April 6, 2022.

D. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE
An online pre-proposal conference will be held on March 23, 9:00 am – 10:00 am. Link and password will be provided in response to RSVP to conference.

Interested consultants must RSVP for this meeting to Matthew Blythe via email at [email protected] no later than 5 p.m. on March 23, 2022. This pre-proposal conference is not mandatory; however, it is highly recommended.

III. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
A. COUNTY RIGHTS & OPTIONS

1. All proposals must be submitted to the County’s Purchasing website in Adobe PDF format no later than 3:00 p.m. on April 6, 2022. Late proposals will not be considered.

2. The County reserves the right to request any missing information in a proposal submitted in response to this RFP. Proposer shall have 24 hours to provide the information to the requesting Buyer.

3. All costs incurred in the preparation and submission of proposals and related documentation will be borne solely by the proposer.

4. This RFP does not constitute an offer of employment or to contract for services.

5. The County may, in its sole and absolute discretion, accept or reject any and all proposals, in whole or in part, with or without cause, in response to this RFP, and to make more than one award, or no award, or postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFP process, as which the County determines to be in its best interests.

6. The County reserves the right to remedy technical errors, modify the published scope of services and approve or disapprove the use of all sub-consultants.

7. The issuance of this RFP does not constitute an agreement by the County that any subsequent selection process will occur, or that any contract will be entered into by the County. Proposals and other materials will not be returned.

8. The County has the right to use any or all ideas or concepts presented in any proposal or interview without restriction, without conversation to all applicants.

9. All documents submitted to the County in response to this RFP will become the exclusive property of the County.

10. All proposals shall remain firm for one hundred twenty, (120) days following closing date for receipt of proposals.

11. An impartial Selection Committee will develop a ranking of consultant proposals. This ranking will be used to develop a short list of the top qualified firms. #16..
- 1146 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 7 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

12. The firms on the short list may be asked to participate in oral interviews with the Selection Committee. Oral interviews may be conducted to develop a final ranking of firms. The proceedings of the Selection Committee are confidential, and members of the Selection Committee are not to be contacted by the proposers.

13. The County reserves the right to award the contract to the firms who present the proposal which, in the judgment of the County, best accomplishes the desired results.

14. The term of the contract will be approximately THREE (3) years from date of award with the option to renew two (2) successive one (1) year terms beginning upon the expiration of this contract. Each one (1) year renewal shall be made in writing.

15. Any contract awarded pursuant to this RFP will incorporate the requirements and specifications contained in this RFP. All information presented in a proposer’s proposal will be considered binding upon selection of the successful proposer, unless otherwise modified and agreed to by the County during subsequent negotiations.

16. Under the provisions of the California Public Records Act (the “Act”), Government Code section 6252 et seq., the County may be obligated to provide a copy of any and all records that the proposer provides County relating to this RFP (hereafter “Records from Proposer”) , including those records which the proposer believes constitute confidential information. If the County determines (in its sole discretion) that (i) a person/entity has requested a copy of records that would include Records from Proposer , and (ii) the County does not have sufficient direct, first-hand knowledge to independently conclude that such Records from Proposer are exempt from disclosure under the Act, and (iii) the requester is not willing to accept the proposer’s claim that the Records from Proposer are exempt from disclosure under the Act, the County will provide the proposer written notice thereof (via mail and/or email). If the proposer does not, within seven court business days thereof, file the appropriate papers in San Luis Obispo County Superior Court (“Court”) seeking a court order preventing the County from disclosing any such Records from Proposer to the requester, and have its request heard by the Court within 30 days thereof, the proposer shall be deemed to have waived any claim that the Records from Proposer are exempt under the Act. (The County reserves the right to issue a written extension of time if it determines (in its sole discretion) that one is appropriate.) Under no circumstances shall the proposer be entitled to recover from County any of its court costs, attorney’s fees or other litigation expenses that are related in any way to whether any Records from Proposer are exempt under the Act. If any proposer believes that information contained in its response to this RFP should be protected from disclosure, the proposer MUST specifically identify the pages of the response that contains the information by properly marking the applicable pages and inserting the following notice in the front of its response:

NOTICE: The data on pages _ of this response identified by an asterisk (*) contain technical or financial information, which are trade secrets, or information for which disclosure would result in substantial injury to the proposer’s competitive position. Proposer requests that such data be used only for the evaluation of the response, but understands that the disclosure will be limited to the extent the County considers proper under the law. If an agreement is entered into with the proposer, the County shall have the right to use or disclose the data as provided in the agreement, unless otherwise obligated by law.

The County will not honor any attempt by proposer to designate its entire proposal as proprietary. If there is any dispute, lawsuit, claim or demand as to whether information #16..
- 1147 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 8 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities within the response to the RFP is protected from disclosure under the Act, proposer shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless, the County arising out of such dispute, lawsuit, claim or demand.

17. The proposer warrants that no official or employee of the County has an interest, has been employed or retained to solicit or aid in the procuring of any contract resulting from this RFP, if any, and further warrants that such person will not be employed in the performance of the contract without immediate written notice to the County.

18. Firms submitting proposals shall warrant that their offer is made without any previous understanding, agreement or connection with any person, firm or corporation submitting a separate proposal for the same project and is in all respects fair, without outside control, collusion, fraud or otherwise illegal action. This condition shall not apply to proposals which are submitted by firms who have partnered with others to submit a cooperative proposal that clearly identifies a primary contractor and the associated sub-contractors.

19. Contractor shall comply with all laws and regulations governing nondiscrimination in employment, including the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Fair Employment and Housing Act (California Government Code §§ 12900, et seq.), and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (2 California Code of Regulations §§ 7285, et seq.).

19.1. Nondiscrimination: The Contractor, with regard to the work performed by them during the Contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color or national origin or other legally protected criteria in employment or the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The Contractor shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the Contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulation.

19.2. Solicitation for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment. In all solicitation, either by competitive bidding or negotiation, made by the Contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Contractor of the Contractor’s obligations under this Contract and the regulations

20. Unforeseen additional items and/or services may be required. The County therefore reserves the right to negotiate with the successful proposer for additional items and/or services beyond what is described in Appendix A to be added to the final contract.

21. The County desires to avoid potential conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflicts of interest between the successful proposer and the consultants currently performing services at the Los Osos Landfill, which the proposer shall be overseeing. For these reasons, proposers currently performing services for the County at the Los Osos Landfill are ineligible to bid.

B. PREVAILING WAGE
At least a portion of this work is prevailing wage work. For any work done by the prime contractor or a subcontractor under this agreement, in accordance with Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., prime contractor must pay employees at least the prevailing rate #16..
- 1148 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 9 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities wages for public works performed on the Project. Prime contractor and any applicable subcontractors listed in your proposal must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) prior to the closing of this RFP. Contractor must submit certified payroll records to DIR at least monthly for such work. The work is subject to DIR monitoring and enforcement. Prime contractor, as well as all subcontractors under this agreement, must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations for the entire term of the contract.

NOTE: YOUR PROPOSAL WILL BE REJECTED AND NOT CONSIDERED IF YOU

AND ANY APPLICABLE SUBCONTRACTORS LISTED IN YOUR PROPOSAL ARE NOT REGISTERED AT THE TIME THE RFP CLOSES.

Contractors can register at:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html
C. CHANGES TO THE RFP
This RFP is posted on the County’s Purchasing website at http://www.slocounty.ca.gov/GS/Purchasing/Current_Formal_Bids_and_Proposals.htm. Any changes, additions, or deletions to this RFP will be in the form of written addenda issued by the County. Any addenda will be posted on the website. Prospective proposers must check the website for addenda or other relevant new information during the response period. The County is not responsible for the failure of any prospective proposer to receive such addenda. All addenda so issued shall become a part of this RFP. Any proposer who has already submitted their proposal and desires to make corrections, may remove and replace their proposal on the Purchasing website up to the date and time for which this RFP closes.

D. COMMUNICATIONS
All communications concerning the RFP process shall be directed to Leah St James at [email protected]. All technical questions concerning the RFP shall be posted on the website. All other communication is not binding and shall in no way modify the RFP or the obligations of the County.

The proceedings of the Selection Committee are confidential, and members of the Selection Committee are not to be contacted by the proposers. After the solicitation has closed, proposers can view the RFP on the Purchasing website where any available award information will be posted and updated within the solicitation. Any questions and requests for information must be addressed to the Buyer.

E. INSURANCE
The selected proposer will be required to provide insurance coverage in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) Commercial General Liability (CGL) Insurance and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) Professional Liability Insurance. See Appendix B – Sample Contract for complete insurance and indemnification requirements.

INSURANCE REQUIRED AMOUNT
CGL & Property Damage $ 1.0 Million per occurrence
#16..
- 1149 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 10 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities Professional Liability
$ 1.0 Million per occurrence /
$ 2.0 Million aggregate
Auto Liability /Property Damage/Bodily
Injury $ 1.0 Million per occurrence
Workers Compensation & Disability Benefits $ 1.0 Million per occurrence The selected proposer shall provide within five (5) days after the Notice of Award is issued a certificate of liability insurance naming the County of San Luis Obispo and its employees and officers as additionally named insured. This shall be maintained in full force and effect for the duration of the contract and must be in an amount and format satisfactory to the County.

F. EXCEPTIONS & DEVIATIONS
Any exceptions to or deviations from the requirements set forth in this RFP must be declared in the proposal submitted by the proposer. Such exceptions or deviations must be segregated as a separate element of the proposal under the heading “Exceptions and Deviations” as instructed below in section IV. The County may waive any immaterial deviation or defect in a proposal.

G. AWARD AND STANDARD AGREEMENT
The County reserves the right to make awards within one hundred twenty, (120) days after the date of the RFP closing. The successful proposer is expected to execute a contract similar to the contract in Appendix B. This sample contract is for reference to the anticipated terms and conditions governing the County and the successful proposer. The proposer must take exception in their proposal to any section of the attached contract they do not agree with. Failing to do so will be deemed as acceptance by the proposer to the terms spelled out in the sample contract. The County reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to add, delete, or modify, or negotiate additional terms and conditions to the attached contract. BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK OR SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL

IT IS ADVISED THAT PROPOSERS READ THE COUNTY INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION REQUIREMENTS IN THE ATTACHED SAMPLE CONTRACT. The selected proposer will be asked to provide evidence that County insurance requirements have been met.
#16..
- 1150 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 11 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities IV. PROPOSAL FORMAT
Qualifications Proposal:

A Qualifications Proposal must address all of the following points and shall be in the format outlined in this section:

1. Project Title

2. Applicant or Firm Name

3. Format and Firm Qualifications

4. Project Understanding
To respond to the RFP, a proposer must submit a proposal on or before the deadline. The proposal shall be limited to twelve (12) pages in length, not including cover letter, resumes, Fee Schedule, or the following forms which can be included in the appendices:

Risk Assessment Questionnaire, Designation of Subcontractors Form, Local Vendor Preference or the Proposer Checklist. The proposal must be signed by a person authorized to bind the proposing firm to the representations, commitments and statements contained in the proposal. The proposal must contain the following information and documents:
a. Cover letter summarizing the key points of the proposal (2 pages max.) b. Description of Firm and Key Subconsultants. A description of the firm’s organizational structure, the jurisdiction in which the firm is organized and date of such organization. In addition, provide a brief description of the firm’s qualifications and experience on projects of similar nature to those described in the proposal as well as projects/clients where consultant has performed as an extension of staff. Provide similar information for each key subconsultant.

Describe similar projects where the prime consultant and firm has worked with the subconsultant.
c. Authorized representative of the proposer. The name, address, telephone number, and email address of the person authorized to represent the proposer with respect to all notices, negotiations, discussions, and other communications relating to this proposal, to any negotiation relating to the contract. d. Staffing. Provide an organizational chart identifying: 1) the project manager for the work; 2) each key person, including subconsultant and personnel, who would be assigned to carry out the work, and their respective roles in performing the work.

Provide a separate description of the experience and qualifications of such manager and key persons, including a summary of experience on similar projects to those described in this proposal. Resumes should be included for all key individuals as an appendix to the submittal.
e. References. A list of no more than three references for the proposer and no more than three references for subconsultants, including the names, addresses and #16..
- 1151 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 12 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities telephone numbers of recent clients, preferably other public agencies and a listing of the specific projects and key individuals that have participated in them. Include the dollar amount related to the participation. Identify how much experience the firm and sub consultant has had with public agencies.

D. Project Understanding
a. This section should establish that the proposer understands the County’s objectives and requirements, demonstrate the proposer’s ability to meet those requirements, outline clearly and concisely the plan for how personnel would be organized to handle these services to achieve the project goals. b. Clearly indicate how proposed subconsultants would be utilized to achieve project goals.

E. Required Attachments Appendix
a. Resumes. In the Appendix, proposer shall include resumes (each 2 pages maximum) for all key personnel, the specific projects and roles of the individuals, specialty licenses, certificates or relevant training. List all similar work. Cross reference key personnel with relevant examples of similar work.

Cost Proposal - Fee Schedule
A. Fee Schedule
The submitted fee schedule shall detail the billing rates for each firm’s and subconsultant’s key individuals, other position’s overhead rates, subconsultant mark-ups, and other costs.

Include any and all other costs for office, vehicle, cell phones, per diem, etc. Travel cost reimbursement rates must conform to the County’s Travel Policy reimbursements; costs above these rates are not allowed. See Appendix E. Fee schedule must be submitted in a separate Adobe Acrobat Portable Data Format (.pdf) file and shall not be included within the technical proposal.

V. PROPOSAL SELECTION & CONTRACT AWARD
A. SELECTION PROCEDURES
Proposals will be evaluated by a Selection Committee comprised of one or more County departments and stakeholders. The Selection Committee will consider the completeness of a proposal and how well the proposal meets the needs of the District. Evaluations will be based on criteria as outlined in Section B (Selection Criteria) below. All proposals in response to this RFP will be evaluated using the same criteria.

The sole purpose of the selection procedure is to determine, from among the responses received, which one is the best qualified for the work described in this RFP. Any final analysis or weighted score does not imply that one proposer is superior to another, but simply that, in the Selection Committee’s judgment, the selected proposer appears to be best qualified for the District’s current and anticipated needs.

The County may require the proposers who receive top rankings during the initial evaluation phase to conduct an on-site interview or oral presentation of their proposal.

The County will provide a required agenda, for those proposers, specifying the items to be covered during the proposer’s presentation in the event the District conducts interviews. #16..
- 1152 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 13 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities B. SELECTION CRITERIA
The County will evaluate the proposals based on, but not limited to, the following criteria:

C. FINAL SELECTION
The Selection Committee will formulate its recommendation for award of the Contract and forward its selection to the appropriate parties for approval.

D. CONTRACT AWARD AND EXECUTION
The County reserves the right to enter into a contract without further discussion of the submitted proposal. Therefore, the proposal should be initially submitted on the most favorable terms the proposer can offer.

The County reserves the right to withdraw the RFP in whole or in part, at any time and for any reason. Submission of a proposal confers no rights upon a proposer and does not obligate the County in any manner. The County reserves the right to award no contract and to solicit additional offers at a later date.

Each proposer, by submitting a proposal, agrees that if the County accepts its proposal, such proposer will furnish all items and services upon the terms and conditions in this RFP and subsequent contract. Proposals that do not meet the mandatory requirements set forth in this RFP will be considered non-compliant. Proposers may be disqualified and the proposal may be rejected by the County for any of, but not limited to, the following reasons:
• Failure to properly respond to the RFP;
• Evidence of collusion among the proposers submitting the proposals; • Failure to comply with the specification requirements of the RFP.

Terms, conditions, prices, methodology, or other features of the Contractor’s proposal may be subject to negotiation and subsequent revision. As part of the negotiations, the Contractor may be Selection Criteria – RFP Points Available
Understanding of project 20
Demonstrated expertise in performing similar work and
technical ability 30
Qualifications and experience of key staff 30
Familiarity with state and federal regulations and complex stakeholder/institutional issues 10
Consultant team’s resources and availability to provide services efficiently and expediently as well as on short notice/emergency basis 10
Total Points Available Per Contractor 100
#16..
- 1153 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 14 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities required to submit additional financial information and other data to allow for a detailed evaluation of the feasibility, reasonableness, and acceptability of the proposal.

The RFP document and the successful proposer’s proposal response, as amended by agreement between the County and the successful Contractor, including e-mail or written correspondence relative to the RFP, may become part of the contract documents. Additionally, the County may verify the successful proposer’s representations that appear in the proposal. Failure of the successful proposer to perform as represented may result in elimination of the successful proposer from competition or in contract cancellation or termination.

The requirements listed in this RFP are not negotiable and will remain unchanged unless the County determines that a change in such requirements is in the best interest of the County.

The County expressly reserves the right, in its sole judgment, to accept or reject any or all proposals, with or without cause, modify, alter, waive any technicalities or provisions, or to accept the proposal which, in its sole judgment, is determined to be the best evaluated offer resulting from negotiation and taking into consideration other evaluation factors set forth in the RFP. The successful proposer will be expected to enter into a contract with the County. If the successful proposer fails to sign a contract within fifteen (15) business days, unless the County grants an extension, following the delivery of the contract documents, the County may elect to negotiate a contract with the next-highest ranked proposer.

The County shall not be bound, or in any way obligated, until both parties have executed a contract. The selected proposer may not incur any chargeable costs prior to final contract execution. The foregoing should not be interpreted to prohibit either party from proposing additional contract terms and conditions during the negotiation of the final Contract.

The supplies and services are to be provided in compliance with all applicable state and federal standards, rules and regulations. The County reserves the right to request additional written and/or oral information from proposers at any time before contract award, in order to obtain clarification of their responses.

E. PROTEST OF AWARD
Any objection to the County’s final decision will be handled according to applicable state and local procurement laws.
#16..
- 1154 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 15 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities VI. DEFINITIONS
Response: The written, signed and sealed complete document submitted according to the proposal instructions. Response does not include any verbal or documentary interaction apart from submittal of a formal Response.

Request/Proposal/Bid: The completed and released document, including all subsequent addenda, made publicly available to all prospective proposers.

We/Us/Our: Terms that refer to the County of San Luis Obispo, a duly organized public entity. They may also be used as pronouns for various subsets of the County organization, including, as the context will indicate.

Purchasing: The Contracts and Purchasing Services Division of the Department of Central Services.

Department/Division: The department or division requesting the goods or services contained in this request, for which this PROPOSAL is prepared and which will be the end user of the requested goods or services.

You/Your: Terms that refer to businesses/individuals submitting a response. The term may apply differently as the context will indicate.

Supplier: A business entity engaged in the business of providing services.

Proposer: A business entity submitting a Response to this proposal. Suppliers which may express interest in this proposal, but who do not submit a Response, have no obligations with respect to the proposal requirements.

Contractor: The proposer(s) whose Response to this proposal is evaluated as meeting the needs of the County. Contractor(s) will be selected for award and will enter into a contract(s) for provision of the services described in this proposal.

Contractor’s Employee: All persons who can be offered to provide the services described in the proposal. All employees of the Contractor shall be covered by the insurance programs normally provided to persons employed by a company (ex: Worker’s Comp, SDI, etc.).

Mandatory: A required element of this request/proposal/bid. Failure to satisfy any element of this request/proposal/bid defined as “mandatory” will disqualify the particular response.

Default: A failure to act as required by any contract resulting from this request, which may trigger the right to sue or may excuse the other party's obligation to perform under the contract.

Cancellation/Termination: A unilateral or mutual decision to not complete an exchange or perform an obligation under any contract resulting from this request. “Or Equal”: A statement used for reference to indicate the character or quality desired in a requested product or service. When specified in a proposal document, equal items will be considered, provided the response clearly describes the article. Offers of equal items must state the brand and number, or level of quality. When brand, number, or level of quality is not stated by proposer, the offer will be considered exactly as specified. The determination of the Purchasing Agent as to what items are equal is final and conclusive.
#16..
- 1155 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 16 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities APPENDIX A – DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
The services requested under this RFP will include all management, administrative, planning, engineering, design, and operational and maintenance services as needed to carryout required post closure and ongoing corrective action plan on behalf of the County. Level of service and work performed will be as needed to maintain compliance with all State and Federal requirements.

The services requested under this RFP will begin with preliminary engineering to analyze and refine the post closure and corrective action plan in order to define a scope prior to commencing the subsequent management of post closure activities. It is anticipated that multiple contracts or task orders will be issued as the scope is defined and management of landfill post closure activities proceeds.

The sample contract attached to this RFP would serve as the basis for a master services agreement with specific tasks and work product being issued individual notices to proceed.

Engineering Services in the anticipated scope of work include but are not limited to the following:
• Performing broad functions of management of the project including:
o Monitoring activities for post closure maintenance and long-term monitoring pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 27, and in accordance with Waste Discharge Order No. R3-2007-0023
o Monitoring performance of existing remediation systems, which includes the monitoring well network, cap and drainage system, gas collection and flare system, groundwater extraction and treatment system, and any other system appurtenant to post closure activities at the Landfill
o Providing oversight of existing contracted services for required monitoring and reporting activities
o Providing oversight of existing contracted services for required operation and maintenance (O&M) of existing remediation systems
• Planning, modifying, developing, and implementing O&M and corrective maintenance activities as needed to maintain operation and performance of the remediation systems; • Developing and analyzing engineering alternatives for corrective actions to address Cleanup or Abatement Order No. 95-66;
• Providing regulatory and technical guidance, including engagement with regulatory agencies as needed, in response to requests for information, etc.

Routine post closure maintenance activities in the anticipated scope of work include but are not limited to the following:

1. Semi-Annual Groundwater Sampling

2. Semi-Annual Monitoring Reports

3. Oversee SEM Surface Methane Monitoring Program

4. Complete and submit Wet Weather Preparedness Report

5. Maintain landfill roads.

6. Maintain landfill cap including mowing and drainage system integrity.

7. Prepare for semiannual NPDES Inspection (SWARM) and other routine site inspections according to WDR requirements.

8. Submit Regulatory Reports to Regional Water Quality Control Board and correspond with regarding corrective action.

9. Produce and submit a monthly copy of gas reports to CalRecycle.

10. Complete annual APCD survey report.
#16..
- 1156 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 17 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

11. Inspect and maintain gas collection system including flare station and components.

12. Conduct Landfill Gas and Landfill Gas Condensate Sampling.

13. Oversee routine gas well balancing

14. Conduct biannual source test and report results to APCD

15. Track and process invoices

16. Prepare and submit annual budget

17. Prepare and submit yearly financial assurance reports and financial assurance reports for corrective action every five years.

18. Manage the implementation and operation of the landfill’s pump and treat system #16..
- 1157 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 18 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities APPENDIX B – SAMPLE CONTRACT
(Attached as a separate document)
#16..
- 1158 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 19 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities APPENDIX C – LOCAL VENDOR PREFERENCE
The County has established a local vendor preference. When quality, service, and other relevant factors are equal, responses to Requests for Proposals will be evaluated with a preference for local vendors. Note the following exceptions:

1. Those contracts which State Law or, other law or regulation precludes this local preference.

2. Public works construction projects.

A "local" vendor preference will be approved as such when, 1) The vendor conducts business in a fully staffed office with a physical address within the County of San Luis Obispo; 2) The vendor holds a valid business license issued by the County or a city within the County; and 3) The vendor has conducted business at the local address for not less than six (6) months prior to the due date of this Request for Proposal.

Proposals received in response to this Request for Proposal will be evaluated by the Selection Committee considering the local vendor preference described above when quality, service and other relevant factors are equal. The burden of proof will lie with proposers relative to verification of "local" vendor preference. Should any questions arise, please contact a buyer at (805) 781-5200.

YES NO
Do you claim local vendor preference?
Do you conduct business in an office with a physical
location within the County of San Luis Obispo?
Business Address:
___________________________________________________________________ Years at this Address:

Does your business hold a valid business license issued by the County or a City within the County?
Name of Local Agency which issued license: ________________________________ Business Name: ________________________________________________________ Authorized Individual: ____________________ Title: ___________________________ Signature: _____________________________ Dated: __________________________ #16..
- 1159 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 20 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities APPENDIX D – RISK ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Required Submittal

1. List the full names of any partners, owners, officers or other persons occupying a position of authority or responsibility in your organization, as well as their DUNS number.

DUNS Number Organization
NOTE: A DUNS number is not required but must be listed if the entity has one.

2. Have the individual(s) in item #1 been subject to bankruptcy, insolvency or receivership proceedings in the last five (5) years? Yes  No If yes, please enclose details.

3. Has your business/company/organization filed for bankruptcy within the last five (5) years? Yes  No If so, please enclose details.

4. Has your business/company/organization/individual(s) in item #1 ever had a contract for the general type of services/product sought by the County terminated for non-compliance or inadequate performance? Yes  No If yes, please enclose details.

5. Has your business/company/organization/individual(s) in item #1 ever defaulted on a contract for the general type of services/product being sought by the County? Yes  No If yes, please enclose details.

6. Has there been, in the last five (5) years, or is there now pending or threatened, any litigation, arbitration, governmental proceeding or regulatory proceeding involving claims in excess of $100,000 with respect to the performance of any services or the provision of any product by your business/company/organization/individual(s) in item #1? Yes  No If yes, please enclose details.

7. Has your business/company/organization/individual(s) in item #1 ever defaulted in fulfilling all of its obligations relating to the payment of county taxes, fees, or other obligations? Yes  No If yes, please enclose details.
#16..
- 1160 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 21 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

8. In the last five (5) years, has your business/company/organization/individual(s) in item #1, been or currently involved in any action, audit or investigation brought by any federal government agency or authority or by any state or local governmental agency? Yes  No If yes, please enclose details.

9. In the last five (5) years, has your business/company/organization/individual(s) in item #1 been debarred or suspended for any reason by any federal, state or local government or refrained from bidding on a project due to an agreement with such governmental agency? Yes  No If yes, please attach a full explanation.

10. In the past five (5) years, has your business/company/organization/individual(s) in item #1 had its surety called upon to complete any contract, whether government or private sector? Yes  No If yes, please enclose details.

11. In the past five (5) years, has your business/company/organization/individual(s) in item #1 had a revocation, suspension or disbarment of any business or professional permit and/or license? Yes  No If yes, please enclose details.

12. Has your firm or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty? Yes  No If “yes,” identify on a separate signed page the person or persons convicted, the court (the county if a state court, the district or location of the federal court), the year and the criminal conduct.

Signature

THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT THE RESPONSES PROVIDED ARE CORRECT

AND TRUTHFUL TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND FOR THOSE RESPONSES GIVEN

WHICH ARE BASED ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF, THOSE RESPONSES ARE TRUE AND CORRECT BASED ON MY PRESENT BELIEF AND INFORMATION.

Dated this ______ day of __________________ of the year _________ Name of organization: _____________________________________________ Signature: _______________________________________________________ Printed Name and title: _____________________________________________ #16..
- 1161 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 22 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities APPENDIX E – COUNTY TRAVEL POLICY
(Attached as a separate document)
#16..
- 1162 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 23 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities APPENDIX F – DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
In compliance with the provisions of Sections 4100-4113 of the Public Contract Code of the State of California, and any amendments thereto, the undersigned proposer sets forth the following:
a. The name, License No. if applicable, DIR Registration No., and location of the place of business of prime contractor and each subcontractor who will perform work or labor, or render service to the undersigned Prime Contractor in or about the scope of the work.

Business Name License No. DIR Reg. No.** Address
Prime Contractor
(your information)
Subcontractors
By: __________________________________________________________________________________ (Proposer's Signature/Printed Name and Title/Company Name) NOTE: Contractors, and all applicable subcontractors listed in your proposal, MUST register with the DIR prior to the RFP closing. The County will not consider any proposal submitted in response to this RFP where prevailing wages shall be paid to either the prime contractor, or their subcontractor(s), if the prime contractor (and its subcontractors, if applicable) are not registered with the Department of Industrial Relations at the time the RFP closes.

If you are already registered with the DIR, please double check that you have renewed your registration for the fiscal year before submitting your proposal.

The following link will take you to the registration page of the DIR website:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/Contractor-Registration.html #16..
- 1163 -
County of San Luis Obispo RFP PS- #1665 March 16, 2022 Page 24 Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities APPENDIX G – PROPOSER CHECKLIST
Please check all documents in which you have included with your submittal.

Technical Proposal (Required).........................................................................................................□ (Including resumes) Cost Proposal (Required) .................................................................................................................□ Local Vendor Preference.................................................................................................................□ Risk Assessment Questionnaire (Required) ..................................................................................□ Designation of Subcontractors Form.............................................................................................□ #16..
- 1164 -

QUALIFICATIONS PROPOSAL
RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for
the Los Osos Landfill
Post Closure Activities
County of San Luis Obispo
APRIL 18, 2022
#16..
- 1165 -

TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
1 Cover Letter & Authorized
Representative of Proposer iii
2 Description of Firm &
Key Subconsultants 01
3 Staffing 08
4 References 10
5 Project Understanding 11
Appendix 13
Resumes
Exceptions & Deviations
Required Forms
#16..
- 1166 -
hdrinc.com
3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92606-1377
T 714.730.2300
April 18, 2022
County of San Luis Obispo
Attn: Leah St James, Senior Buyer - Central Services Purchasing Submitted via Public Purchase
RE: HDR’s Proposal to Provide Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities (RFP PS- #1665)
Dear Selection Committee,
Through this RFP, the County of San Luis Obispo (County) is continuing to look ahead and address its regulatory compliance obligations for the post-closure maintenance and monitoring of the Los Osos Landfill.

HDR is uniquely qualified to assist the County in these key areas.

To help the County successfully meet these challenges head-on, we have formed a team possessing the right technical expertise and program management experience, including extension of staff experience. Our team includes nationally recognized landfill compliance and engineering professionals, local permitting and regulatory support personnel, and experienced field services and landfill operations & maintenance subconsultants, JHA Environmental, Inc. and Tetra Tech. The HDR team has staff local to the County and can provide timely response as required. This cover letter summarizes the key points of our proposal and the benefits we bring to the County of San Luis Obispo (County):
• We know the County. We have worked with the County on various projects for over a decade, effectively working with the County’s staff, and developing first-hand knowledge of the County’s policies and procedures. This includes the Los Osos Wastewater Collection System Construction Management project where we provided construction management services for $105 million in improvements to resolve the septic system issues and statemandated Prohibition Zone established in 1983. HDR's newly acquired firm WRECO has also worked with the County on various projects, including providing hydrologic, hydraulics and stormwater engineering services for various project sites.
• We are experienced in providing landfill and solid waste services.

Solid waste services are a cornerstone of HDR’s business, and we are ranked as the number four solid waste firm as reported by Engineering News-Record (ENR) in 2021. As a company, HDR has completed more than 1,200 projects nationwide related to landfill and solid waste services, including locations throughout California.

Our past experience has well positioned us to partner with the County on this project — landfill post closure services with stringent regulatory drivers.
• We possess national technical expertise for PFAS. HDR is at the forefront of the assessment and treatment of PFAS and we have been a leader in the areas of designing and constructing turnkey treatment systems for PFAS removal, conducting
treatability assessments, developing guidance documents for AWWA, contributing to the EPA PFAS Summit, and providing guidance through presentations and expert panel discussions at national conferences. Our proposed Project Manager, Charlie O’Neill, is based out of our Folsom, California office, which is our environmental center of expertise. Charlie and his project team will have direct access to these professionals.
• We have enhanced water treatment experience. HDR has
piloted, designed, validated, built, and operated more than 50 bench-scale, pilot, and demonstration water treatment facilities over the last ten years. We have extensive experience piloting advanced technologies and translating those to designs that lead to operating plants for our clients. These experiences can assist with optimization of existing water treatment systems to meet rigorous discharge requirements.

1. Cover Letter & Authorized Representative of Proposer #16..
- 1167 -
hdrinc.com
3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92606-1377
T 714.730.2300
• We understand your project and needs. It is our understanding of client needs that has earned us an excellent reputation for cost control, quality, and compliance with performance schedules—a track record attested to by numerous “Exceptional” and “Very Good” Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System performance ratings earned by Charlie; nine Brownfields Association Phoenix Awards; and letters of commendation from our customers. HDR understands that the County is subject to stringent interpretation of Title 27, NPDES and emerging regulations.

Therefore, it is critical that the County's consultant not only have a strong understanding of the regulatory requirements, but an understanding of the hydrogeology, the interaction of leachate and landfill gas on contaminant fate and transport, an understanding of Title 27 requirements and experience working with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). In addition, the County’s consultant must have the ability to effectively communicate with the stakeholders (project team, regulatory agencies, and County project team). Because Charlie has proven to be capable in these areas, HDR has designated him to serve as your project manager. Charlie possesses the requisite skill for this project and is supported by a strong and technically diverse team of scientists and engineers experienced in landfill compliance, water treatment, and engineering services.

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROPOSER
Name: John Carlton
Address:3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92602-1377 Telephone Number: 908.319.5992
Email Address: [email protected]
By selecting the HDR team, you will have a strong partner to help assess, define, and achieve your objectives. Together with our teaming partners, we look forward to supporting the County with comprehensive post-closure landfill services combined with issues pertaining to emerging contaminants, advanced water treatment for metals within a complex regulatory environment. We are eager for the opportunity to work together again and serve the County in delivering this interesting and important project. Should you have questions regarding our submittal, please contact our proposed Project Manager, Charlie O’Neill at [email protected] or by phone at 916.817.4764, or our proposed Principal-in-Charge, John Carlton at [email protected] or by phone at 908.319.5992.

Sincerely,
HDR Engineering, Inc.

Charlie O'Neill, PG (CA) Arthur J. Conti
Project Manager Vice President
#16..
- 1168 -
01 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

2. Description of Firm & Key Subconsultants
About HDR
Founded in 1917, HDR is an employeeowned, full-service environmental and architectural engineering firm with more
than 10,500 employee owners located in
more than 200 offices. For more than 40 years, HDR has provided quality solid waste services to our California clients. We are a recognized industry leader providing environmental services and have received nine Phoenix Awards from EPA. Furthermore, our rankings over the past several years in environmental sciences, solid waste, and hazardous waste consulting services by ENR provides testimony to our ability to develop solid waste engineering solutions that work on time and on budget.

HDR has executed over 1,200 landfill projects incorporating hydrogeology, expansion and closure design engineering, and associated monitoring systems throughout the United States, included California. In addition, HDR has conducted over 500 RCRA and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) investigation/remediation projects. Our team has full engineering capabilities to complete the studies and conceptual system design or facility improvements and modifications. We routinely complete conceptual level design for facilities in order to evaluate alternatives and to assess associated construction costs, prior to proceeding with final design and permitting. Conceptual designs develop and evaluate the program needs, alternatives, facility layout and coordination with existing systems, and costs. HDR regularly conducts engineering feasibility studies and conceptual designs for landfills or other solid waste facilities. Drawing on our team’s experience, we have assembled a project team to assist the County with the required tasks outlined in the scope of work (SOW). Our staffing approach focuses on national expertise delivered via local, knowledgeable professionals. The team includes professional geologists, engineers, chemists, and environmental scientists experienced in permit compliance, regulatory agency interaction, and in the preparation of technical reports.

Established: 1917
Headquarters: Omaha, NE
Structure:Employee-Owned,
S Corporation
Key attributes of our firm's capabilities include:
• Over 20 years of extensive experience in design, operation and maintenance of landfill gas collection and control systems (GCCS).
• Engineers who are at the forefront of addressing leachate concerns by designing, operating and maintaining treatment systems that meet and exceed our clients’ expectations.
• Local stormwater management professionals available to provide locally based planning, engineering, and design services.
• A project team with extensive experience in groundwater sampling, treatment, and reporting in accordance with RWQCB, DTSC and/or EPA orders.
• Extensive and broad experience providing PFAS management and treatment solutions to our clients.

We understand California landfill regulations.

We understand California landfill permitting requirements, in particular Title 27 California Code of Regulations (CCR). We have direct experience working with local water boards, including the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. HDR example projects include:
• Imperial County Public Works - Cruickshank Road Disposal Site • El Dorado Canyon - Union Mine Landfill
• Sacramento County - Kiefer Road Landfill
#16..
- 1169 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 02 PROJECT EXPERIENCE

SOUTHEASTERN PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY (SPSA), REGIONAL

LANDFILL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION, SUFFOLK, VA HDR has provided landfill design and construction administration services to the SPSA since 1984. Our work since the 1984 has focused on supporting management, expansion, closure and post-closure inspections, corrective action, and compliance for the landfill. Services include coordination with the landfill gas developer, environmental consulting and field services associated with their permit required groundwater, methane gas, greenhouse gas reporting, and the Title V air permit. We have also assisted with negotiations with the City of Suffolk for a host community agreement, conditional use and rezoning permit applications for the future landfill expansion. Other work has included modifications and repairs to the leachate management systems.

Leachate Management Corrective Action: In 2017, HDR assisted SPSA with developing a remedial strategy to remedy a significant accumulation of leachate on the liner system. Improper operation and maintenance of the collection system over several years resulted in several feet and millions of gallons of leachate within the landfill. Fortunately, leachate elevations were still contained within the liner system when it was discovered. HDR worked with SPSA staff, regulatory officials and staff from the Hampton Roads Sanitation District (HRSD) to implement operational changes, system repairs and emergency pumping procedures and temporary hauling operations to correct the issue.

Compliance with the regulatory leachate levels were attained approximately seven months after it was discovered.

Landfill Gas Monitoring and Recovery System Design and Evaluation: HDR also completed a landfill closure/post-closure plan for the existing Cell I - IV. As part of the closure plan, a comprehensive study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of developing a landfill gas (LFG) recovery system with electric power generation. HDR assisted SPSA with the procurement for the landfill gas lease and development of the collection system and 6000 kW generating capacity.

In addition, HDR recently updated SPSA’s Landfill Gas Management Plan, Gas Containment & Collection Plan, and Start up, Shut-down, and Malfunction Plan for Title V Permit Compliance. HDR continues to provide assistance with review of collection system operations and regulatory reporting and permitting.

Nature and Extent of Contamination Study and Corrective Measures Assessment: In the last 10 years, HDR has provided nature and extent studies for arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, benzene, and vinyl chloride in groundwater, developed Assessment for Corrective Action for these parameters, and developed effective Corrective Action Plans. Most recently, HDR successfully completed the first Corrective Action Study and Evaluation (CASE) Report for the landfill. Each report evaluates the sampling results, identifies trends and exceedances, and where necessary, performs statistical analysis. Scope of Work Elements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 County RFP Scope of Work Elements:
1 Oversight of existing contractor services
2 Post-closure maintenance and long-term monitoring
3 Remediation system performance monitoring
4 Plan, modify, develop, and implement O&M and corrective maintenance activities 5 Develop and analyze engineering alternatives for corrective actions 6 Provide regulatory and technical guidance
#16..
- 1170 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 03 CLOSED LANDFILL ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND COMPLIANCE,

DENBIGH LANDFILL, NEWPORT NEWS, VA
The Denbigh Landfill is a closed 229 acre sanitary landfill originally operated by the City of Newport News until the mid 1990s. This site was previously owned by Conco Incorporated and was purchased by the City in 1981 for use as a Municipal Landfill. HDR is currently providing environmental consulting and field services associated with their permit required groundwater, landfill gas, surface water compliance monitoring, and general permitting. HDR has successfully kept the facility in compliance with the Virginia Solid Waste Regulations over the past five years.

Detection Monitoring: The facility has a groundwater monitoring network that must be monitored regularly; the facility is currently performing Detection Monitoring. HDR coordinates the delivery of sampling kits from the laboratory and performs a QA/QC of analytical results from the laboratory.

Landfill Cap, Leachate System, and Gas System O&M: HDR is assisting the City with the maintenance and repairs of the landfill cap for the facility.

Several areas of the cap have experienced significant settlement and have areas of poor surface water drainage. HDR provided cost-effective solutions to improve drainage using Smart Ditch® systems and traditional soil grading.

HDR also incorporated development aspects in the cap repairs to convert the existing facility into a public education park. Improvement of leachate management for the facility was a priority over the last year. HDR evaluated the existing conditions of an aged collections system and developed a plan and recommendation to replace key components of the collection system.

This involved new, smaller, more efficient pumps that could reach the low spots in the collection system that allow for more leachate to be removed from the waste mass. Also, new control systems were installed to provide more functionally and reliability.

Landfill Gas Consulting Services: The City’s landfill gas-to-energy (LFGTE) system has become more difficult and costly to operate annually. The City wanted to understand what the issues were, how to fix them, and how long the system was still viable. Our national landfill gas specialists were able to sit down and listen to the City’s concerns and experience, inspect the LFGTE system, and provide the City options for the future of gas collection at the facility. We were able to show what the significant issues with the system were and what it would take to improve it at different levels. Ultimately, the appropriate solution was to terminate the active collection of the landfill gas and utilize passive solar spark flares. The revised approach is at a significant cost savings and was the smart solution for a landfill with an aging waste mass nearing the end of its landfill gas generation expectancy.

POST-CLOSURE MAINTENANCE FOR OU D AND OU B1 LANDFILLS,

MCCLELLAN AFB, SACRAMENTO, CA
McClellan AFB closed in 2001; however, the Department of Defense was responsible for ensuring that the hazardous waste sites were closed in compliance with federal and California statutes. USAF hired HDR to perform Title 27 landfill cap maintenance and associated reporting for these Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-permitted facilities. During routine stormwater sampling it was discovered that polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were migrating from the landfill and being deposited into an ephemeral stream.

After notification and coordination with USAF and CVRWQCB, HDR prepared a low-cost solution that included construction of an interceptor trench at the point of discharge form the landfill. This solution was approved by the CVRWQCB, constructed by HDR and was effective at reducing PCB concentrations to less than laboratory detection limits.

Through our proactive management approach, HDR was able to work with the stakeholders to swiftly identify and install a remedy, which prevented the regulator from issuing a NOV.

Scope of Work Elements: 1 2 3 4 5 6
County RFP Scope of Work Elements:
1 Oversight of existing contractor services
2 Post-closure maintenance and long-term monitoring
3 Remediation system performance monitoring
4 Plan, modify, develop, and implement O&M and corrective maintenance activities 5 Develop and analyze engineering alternatives for corrective actions 6 Provide regulatory and technical guidance
Scope of Work Elements: 1 2 3 4 5 6
#16..
- 1171 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 04 HOLT OF CALIFORNIA, CA
Holt of California is the location of an unauthorized release of waste oil, gasoline and diesel fuel to soil and groundwater where cleanup of the release was required under Title 23 CCR Article 5, Article 11 and RWQCB policy 92-49.

HDR performed groundwater monitoring, treatment system operation and maintenance and reporting in accordance with the waste discharge monitoring and reporting program requirement. Based on this finding and remedial optimization analysis, HDR recommended termination of the soil vapor extraction and bioreactor systems and implementation of an ozone sparge system combined with elements of green remediation. HDR’s development of a conceptual site model, statistical evaluation of analytical data, and groundwater modeling to evaluate impacts to nearby water supply wells, was used to achieve case closure by the CVRWQCB and Sutter County with residual contaminants in soil and groundwater at concentrations three orders of magnitude greater than the drinking water maximum contaminant level.

After acquisition of the project, HDR identified sample preservation methods that were the cause of false positive detections ultimately resulting in a remedial action that was unnecessary. HDR’s identification of the issue, and close coordination with CVRWQCB resulted in a change in the remedial action and ultimately case closure. In accordance with Chapter 30, Division 3 of Title 23, CCR and Division 3 of Title 27, CCR, HDR uploaded electronic data (survey data, water levels, boring logs, laboratory electronic data deliverables, and other required information) to the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker database.

CRUICKSHANK ROAD NOV COMPLIANCE, CA
The Imperial County Public Works Department contacted HDR to assist with its response to a Notice of Violation (NOV) from the County Health Department.

The NOV identified the Cruickshank Road disposal site as an illegal disposal site and in violation of 27 CCR 21140 (final cover), 27 CCR 20630 (litter control), 27 CCR 20750 (site maintenance), and 27 CCR 20650 (grading of fill surfaces). HDR prepared a Feasibility Study (FS) to present comparative order of magnitude costs for corrective action. The FS evaluated three alternatives as a decision tool to facilitate selection of a remedial approach. The alternatives consisted of cover the waste as-is, consolidation and cover, and removal. Based upon the FS, the county was able to select, fund and implement the removal alternative without any additional NOVs.

CAMPBELL SOUP, DIXON, CA
Campbell Soup Supply Company contracted with HDR to perform reporting activities associated with compliance of their Waste Discharge Requirements and Monitoring and Reporting Program. HDR performed quarterly and annual reporting as required by the Monitoring and Reporting Program. HDR also prepared a background groundwater quality report that included an updated antidegradation analysis using statistical methods prescribed in 27 CCR 20415(e)(8) as required by the Waste Discharge Requirements. This background evaluation included statistical analysis of the data to calculate background threshold values for TDS, nitrate as nitrogen, sodium, chloride and dissolved iron. Annual updates to background groundwater quality values based on calculation of the upper tolerance level as allowed by 27 CCR 20415(e)(8) (C) were also provided. Further, based on HDR’s background groundwater evaluation, HDR worked with the CVRWQCB on Title 27 requirements to reissue the WDRs to incorporate less stringent groundwater limitations, reduced monitoring frequency and reduced analytical testing requirements.

Scope of Work Elements: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Scope of Work Elements: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Scope of Work Elements: 1 2 3 4 5 6
County RFP Scope of Work Elements:
1 Oversight of existing contractor services
2 Post-closure maintenance and long-term monitoring
3 Remediation system performance monitoring
4 Plan, modify, develop, and implement O&M and corrective maintenance activities 5 Develop and analyze engineering alternatives for corrective actions 6 Provide regulatory and technical guidance
#16..
- 1172 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 05 MADERA COUNTY, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CONSULTING

SERVICES, CA
Madera County operates a comprehensive integrated solid waste management system, including waste collection franchises, recycling and organics collection programs, household hazardous and other special waste programs, and a County owned transfer station and landfill. The County contracted HDR to provide a number of solid waste management consulting services, including:
• Conducting monthly operations meetings to review the operations of the landfill, transfer station, and collection franchises
• Performing quarterly financial reviews to provide guidance on the financial performance of the system
• Developing an Organic Waste Management Plan
• Holding an annual Board of Supervisors Solid Waste Workshop to update the elected County leadership on the solid waste system • Assisting in negotiating amendments to the various private contractor agreements including franchise collections and facility operations.

Working with the County Public Works Department and private contractors, HDR services have resulted in improvements to the financial and operating performance of the County system. Additional improvements, including new services or implementing best management practices, continue to have positive effects on the County’s system.

Scope of Work Elements: 1 2 3 4 5 6

HYDROGEOLOGIC EVALUATION AT SAN MARCOS LANDFILL, SAN DIEGO, CA
HDR performed the Hydrogeologic Evaluation of the Landfill Performance (HELP) model to assess the potential amount of leachate produced during certain weather conditions. The results of this evaluation assisted in the design of a leachate collection system and the configuration of the multiple clay layer system. HDR also designed a surface water management system to minimize the contact of rainfall with the landfill. Gabion-lined ditches were designed to be placed every 9 m (30 vertical ft) to prevent erosion of landfill side slopes.

The ditches drained in strategically placed down chutes that feed to perimeter ditches and holding ponds. Drainage structures were designed to accommodate a 100-year, 24-hour storm event. Rainfall from off-site watersheds was separated from on-site rainfall so storage of off-water would not be required.

The existing ponds were redesigned to retain surface runoff from adjacent watersheds during a 100-year, 24-hour storm. Two ponds were designed so neither would exceed the state or federal Dam Act, necessitating a lengthy permitting process. HDR’s design of the expansion was performed using a MicroStation Intergraph version of CADD and DTM software to assist in certain aspects of the engineering. Various versions of the HELP model were used to analyze hydraulics of the facility.

Scope of Work Elements: 1 2 3 4 5 6
County RFP Scope of Work Elements:
1 Oversight of existing contractor services
2 Post-closure maintenance and long-term monitoring
3 Remediation system performance monitoring
4 Plan, modify, develop, and implement O&M and corrective maintenance activities 5 Develop and analyze engineering alternatives for corrective actions 6 Provide regulatory and technical guidance
#16..
- 1173 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 06 POST-CLOSURE MAINTENANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING AND

LONG-TERM MONITORING, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATIONS WITH
REMEDIAL PROCESS OPTIMIZATION AT LANDFILLS 2 AND 3, BEALE AFB, CA
HDR has provided Title 27 compliance and permitting for Beale AFB that included WDR permitting for discharge to land and post-closure monitoring/ maintenance of Landfills 2 and 3. Tasks performed by HDR associated with post-closure landfill work included: work plan preparation, groundwater monitoring well construction, landfill gas monitoring well construction, landfill liner inspections, landfill gas, stormwater and groundwater sample collection, oversight and management of contractor personnel during subsidence repair, and associated reporting as required by the MRP. These tasks were completed safely, on time, under budget, and to the satisfaction of Beale AFB, the CVRWQCB, and LEA.

ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION SERVICES AT DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION

DEPOT SAN JOAQUIN, TRACY, CA
HDR was responsible for conducting remedial investigation, remedial design for soil gas, soil and groundwater contamination, preparation of remedial design, and remedial action work plans for soil vapor extraction and groundwater pump and treat systems, groundwater modeling, conceptual site model development, long-term monitoring, and groundwater treatment plant operations. The 908- acre site consists of industrial, agricultural and rural residential properties.

HDR performed site-wide remedial action activities for soil and soil gas Scope of Work Elements: 1 2 3 4 5 6
contamination with multiple groundwater plumes impacted with chlorinated solvents—TCE, PCE—and dieldrin. HDR has received a performance rating of “Excellent” from AFCEE and USACE, and received follow-on work as a result of good performance. In addition, HDR achieved cleanup goals at multiple locations to meet protectiveness standards of EPA, DTSC and CVRWQCB.

Sampling, Analysis, Reporting: In 2009, HDR assumed operations at the site and performed quarterly, semiannual, and annual sampling from over 266 wells to evaluate the effectiveness of the remedies for migration control of volatile organic compounds, metals, and pesticides in groundwater. The groundwater program consisted of: 159 monitoring wells, 39 extraction wells, 2 injection wells, 25 observation wells, 7 pesticide piezometers, 8 boundary piezometers, 7 Depot piezometers, 14 privately owned domestic-use wells, and 3 water supply wells. The groundwater analytical results were presented in 3 quarterly reports with trends and progress assessed in an annual report. From 2009 through 2017, HDR collected over 1,800 samples for regular monitoring events.

In 2016, based upon HDR’s progress at the site, the groundwater monitoring program was reduced to 70 groundwater monitoring wells and 3 operating extraction wells
Hydrogeology: In 2012, HDR developed a conceptual site model for remediation of dieldrin in groundwater at the northwestern corner of the Tracy Site. Key components of the conceptual site model were that groundwater could only be effectively extracted from the sandy channels of the buried alluvial fan and that wells installed in saturated but silty zones would not produce sufficient water for plume remediation. To assist with extraction well citing, HDR initiated a predesign Geoprobe investigation to identify appropriate lithologic zones for extraction well screen intervals. After 3 years of extraction, the remedial goals were achieved and HDR decommissioned the extraction system in 2016.

Engineering: In 2010, HDR designed, constructed and operated a new groundwater pump and treat system consisting of 4 extraction wells to 65 feet below ground surface. Extracted groundwater was treated with in-line liquid granular activated carbon treatment systems to remove dieldrin prior to discharge. The treatment system consisted of two 1,000 pound vessels in series. The extraction wells were controlled via a local control point (LCP).

The LCP contained a programmable logic controller (PLC) which allowed both local and remote control of each extraction well. The new LCP was integrated into the existing main control panel (MCP) via a fiber optic communications network. The PLC allowed remote monitoring of flow and water levels within each extraction well. In 2016, the remedial action goals were achieved and the extraction system was decommissioned by HDR.

Scope of Work Elements: 1 2 3 4 5 6
County RFP Scope of Work Elements:
1 Oversight of existing contractor services
2 Post-closure maintenance and long-term monitoring
3 Remediation system performance monitoring
4 Plan, modify, develop, and implement O&M and corrective maintenance activities 5 Develop and analyze engineering alternatives for corrective actions 6 Provide regulatory and technical guidance
#16..
- 1174 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 07 About Our Subconsultants
For this project, we’ve teamed up with JHA Environmental, Inc. (JHA) and Tetra Tech who will be providing field services and landfill gas operations & maintenance, respectively. HDR has previous experience working on projects with both with JHA and Tetra Tech. Charlie has worked with JHA on remediation services projects such as waste discharge monitoring and reporting program compliance for Sierra Chemical Company in West Sacramento, CA. John has worked with Tetra Tech at Madera County as an extension of staff to provide solid waste management consulting services.

JHA Environmental, Inc.

JHA has maintained numerous former
and active landfill sites (open and closed),
working directly for the County of
Orange and others. Work efforts ranged
from operations, maintenance & monitoring (OM&M) of landfill gas recovery systems to groundwater extraction systems. Tasks included groundwater monitoring and sampling, routine and non-routine preventive maintenance and inspections, meter calibrations, pipe inspections, cover maintenance, non-paved road maintenance, clearing & grubbing, emergency response, and reporting.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• The County of Orange (OC Waste & Recycling), Orange County Landfills ° Prima Deshecha Sanitary Landfill, San Juan Capistrano – Weekly OM&M of the Groundwater Extraction System and all liquid conveyance systems on site, such as reclaimed water system, potable water system, leachate collection/storage system, and landfill gas condensate collection/storage system.
° Coyote Canyon Landfill, Newport Beach
– Maintenance of the groundwater systems, regular monthly inspections, meter calibration, keeping all areas clean (including extraction wells, detention vault, sewer riser and storage tank area) including removal of debris and weeds, repair of the sewer line, on an as needed basis.
° Forster Canyon, San Juan Capistrano; Lane Road and San Joaquin Landfill Sites, Irvine
– Performed quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling. • Scannell Properties, Former Branford Landfill in Pacoima – OM&M of the Landfill Gas Recovery System.

Established:2006 - Jacob & Hefner
Associates, Inc. dba JHA Environmental, Inc.

Headquarters: Irvine, CA
Structure: Corporation
Tetra Tech
Tetra Tech is a national provider of
specialized engineering and field services.

The firm’s landfill gas management
practice, established in 1984, provides
OM&M of LFGCCS throughout California. It features an integrated team of engineers and field personnel experienced in landfill engineering, post-closure maintenance, LFGCCS, construction, OM&M, and regulatory compliance.

Tetra Tech has provided similar LFGCCS OM&M and post closure maintenance services at more than 50 landfills in California and Arizona. They have provided landfill consulting services to clients such as the City of Santa Maria, City of Santa Cruz, and the counties of Santa Barbara, Fresno, Merced, Madera, Stanislaus, Sonoma, Shasta, Los Angeles, Orange, and San Bernardino, as well as cities of Anaheim, San Bernardino, California, and cities of Phoenix and Glendale, Arizona.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Division, LFGCCS OM&M
– Provided full OM&M services at landfills over multiple contract terms • OC Waste & Recycling (OCWR), OCWR South Region Landfills LFGCCS OM&M Services
– Has been providing LFG control system OM&M services for landfills in the OCWR’s South Region for 15 years. OCWR’s South Region includes landfills in Irvine, San Juan Capistrano, and Newport Beach. Routine activities include OM&M of flare stations, blowers, generators, air injection systems, air compressors, wellfield, and condensate management systems. • County of Fresno, American Avenue Landfill - LFGCCS OM&M Services – Performing actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the New Source Performance Standards/Emissions Guidelines (NSPS/EG), state, local regulations and permits for the site, as well as the site specific Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan the Title V permit, and Air Emission Related Submittals.

Established: 1966 (Tetra Tech, Inc.) | 1984
(Tetra Tech BAS, Inc.)
Headquarters: Pasadena (Tetra Tech, Inc.) |
Diamond Bar, CA (Tetra Tech BAS, Inc.)
Structure: Corporation
#16..
- 1175 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 08 3. Staffing
*Denotes key personnel

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
John Carlton, PE (MD, FL, NJ), BCEE*

PROJECT MANAGER
Charlie O'Neill, PG*

SAFETY & QUALITY
Quality Program
Doug DeCesare, PE (NE, WY, IA, CO, VA)*
Safety Program
Stephen Coffee, CIH (CO)*

COMPLIANCE MANAGER
Clayton Mokri, REM*
Field Programs
Clayton Mokri, REM*
Chemistry/Geochemistry
Todd Wilson, CHMM*
Hydrogeology
Greg Kelly, PG (WY)*
Risk Assessment
Mike Musso, PE (NY)
Air Quality
Cindy Liles*
Regulatory Specialist
Charlie O'Neill, PG*
Statistics
May Raad*
Public Involvement
Melissa Diamant

ENGINEERING MANAGER
Jeff Murray, PE (NC, VA, LA)*
Landfill Gas
Joel Miller, PE (FL, TX)*
Geotechnical Engineering
David Kitzmann, PE, PG, CEG
Groundwater Treatment
Richard Stratton, PE*
Civil Engineering
Andrea Ramirez, PE

SUBCONSULTANTS
Field Services
Salvador Sanchez* (JHA Environmental, Inc.)
Landfill Gas Engineering, Operations & Maintenance
Sami Ayass, PE* (Tetra Tech)
Organizational Chart
We have identified our project manager and key personnel who would be assigned to carry out the work for this project, along with their roles. Key personnel are denoted with
an asterisk.
#16..
- 1176 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 09 Staff Experience & Qualifications
An overview of our key personnel experience and qualifications is presented in the following table. Please refer to the Appendix for full resumes.

PERSONNEL ROLE SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS
Charlie O’Neill,

PG (CA)
Project Manager;
Regulatory
Specialist
• Extensive experience in project management of
as-needed services contracts, including staff and
subcontractor oversight
• Soil and groundwater corrective action at landfills
• Versed in working with the EPA, RWQCB, & DTSC
• Extensive program and project management including as needed services contracts
John Carlton,

PE (MD, FL, NJ),
BCEE
Principal-inCharge
• Executive management for public-sector authorities
• Strategic solid waste management planning
• Has direct expereince with landfill closure and
remedial design.

Doug
DeCesare,

PE (NE, WY, IA,

CO, VA)
Quality Program
• Solid waste and environmental project design
• Experienced with landfill permitting, leachate collection systems, landfill closure, and gas collection systems
Stephen Coffee,
CIH (CO) Safety Program
• Occupational safety and health expertise
• Safety programs and policies
• Employee training and audits
Clayton Mokri,

REM (US)
Compliance
Manager;
Field Programs
• Field programs for environmental assessment,
remediation, and landfill compliance
• Regulatory compliance
• Environmental reporting
Todd Wilson,

CHMM (US)
Chemistry/
Geochemistry
• Environmental chemistry and geochemistry
• Field audits
• Data validation
Greg Kelly,
PG (WY) Hydrogeology
• Investigative hydrogeology at CERCLA, RCRA, and
commercial hazardous-waste sites.
• Environmental investigations in California, Colorado and New Mexico
Cindy Liles Air Quality
• Extensive waste management experience
• Experience with solid waste permit requirements and
air quality

PERSONNEL ROLE SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS
May Raad Statistics
• Specialist in predictive analytics, statistical modeling and analysis
• Versed in a range of statistical approaches including regression, multivariate analysis and implementation of analytics processes
Jeff Murray,

PE (NC, VA, LA)
Engineering
Manager
• Proficient in landfill closures, post closure landfill re-use • 2020 recipient of SWANA’s Distinguished Individual
Achievement Award for service to the solid waste
industry and the landfill management technical division Joel Miller,
PE (FL, TX) Landfill Gas
• Versed in air and waste facility permitting, including Title V, NSPS/EG, NESHAP, GHG reporting and other
regulatory requirements.
• Technical expertise in a variety of landfill gas, solid waste and landfill gas collection and control systems
Richard
Stratton,

PE (CA, NV, OR)
Groundwater
Treatment
• Water and wastewater engineering experience includes
master planning, design, and construction of treatment
plants, pumping stations, pipelines, storage tanks,
wells, biosolids handling, and reverse osmosis and
brine management.
• Experience includes more than 90 water treatment
plant projects.

Salvador
Sanchez
(JHA)
Field Services
• Extensive field experience with operation and
maintenance, monitoring, and troubleshooting of
remediation systems.
• Numerous landfill projects, heavy equipment operation, groundwater, soil vapor, soil, and ambient air sampling.

Sami Ayass,

PE (CA, TX)
(Tetra Tech)
Landfill Gas
Engineering,
Operations &
Maintenance
• Experienced in the design, construction and operation of landfill gas collection and control systems at southern California landfill facilities.
• Specialist in the preparation and processing of regulatory reports documenting landfill gas system operation and
maintenance programs
#16..
- 1177 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 10 4. References

CLIENT REFERENCE PROJECT REFERENCE INFORMATION KEY INDIVIDUALS $ AMOUNT RELATED TO

PARTICIPATION

1. Southeastern Public Service
Authority (SPSA)
Regional Landfill Design &
Construction Administration
Dennis L. Bagley | T: 757.961.3487
723 Woodlake Dr.,
Chesapeake, VA 23320
• Jeff Murray
• Doug DeCesare
• Joel Miller $250K / Year

2. Madera County Solid Waste Management
Consulting Services
Jared Carter | T:559.675.7811
200 West Fourth Street
Madera, CA 93637
• Jeff Murray
• John Carlton
• Cindy Liles $1.1M

3. USACE Tulsa District Northern Area Groundwater RCRA Facility Investigation, Ft. Wingate Depot Activity
Saqib Khan | T: 918.669.7374
2488 East 81 St, Ste 1600
Tulsa, OK 74137
• Charlie O’Neill
• Clayton Mokri
• Greg Kelly
• May Raad
• Todd Wilson
$2.3M
HDR works with public agencies, including municipalities, counties, state and federal clients, on a day-to-day basis. We have 17 offices in California, providing us a strong, local familiarity with a solid and in-depth understanding of the requirements and constraints involved in public agency projects. Our subconsultants are also experienced in working with local cities and counties. A few examples are provided as references in the tables below.

HDR REFERENCES

CLIENT REFERENCE PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION KEY INDIVIDUALS $ AMOUNT RELATED TO

PARTICIPATION

1. The County of Orange
(OC Waste & Recycling)
JHA Project:

Orange County Landfills
Tetra Tech Project:

OCWR South Region Landfills LFGCCS
OM&M Service
JHA Project:

Wendi Osborne | T: 714.834.2166
300 N. Flower Street, Suite 400
Santa Ana, CA 92703
Tetra Tech Project:

Hany Ahmed, P.E. | T: 949.392.0585
601 N. Ross St., 5th Floor
Santa Ana, California 92701
JHA Project:
• Salvador Sanchez
Tetra Tech Project:
• Sami Ayass
JHA Project:
$600K
Tetra Tech Project:
$8.2M (Through Year 3)
Current (2017) Contract –
Present

2. County of San Bernardino Solid
Waste Management Division
Tetra Tech Project:

LFGCCS OM&M – San Bernardino County
Solid Waste Management Division
Marc Rodabaugh, P.E. | T: 909.386.8701
222 W Hospitality Ln # 2nd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92415
• Sami Ayass $7.3M
Original (2016) Contract –
2019

3. County of Fresno Tetra Tech Project:

American Avenue Landfill - LFGCCS
OM&M Services
Curtis Larkin | T: 559.600.4259
2220 Tulare Street 6th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721
• Sami Ayass $506K
Original (2016) Contract –
Present

SUBCONSULTANT REFERENCES
#16..
- 1178 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 11 5. Project Understanding
Introduction
The closed Los Osos landfill occupies approximately 25 acres and is classified under Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations as a closed Class III nonhazardous waste landfill. In December 1958, landfill operations began and consisted of placing waste directly on the native soils of a former gravel quarry.

In November 1988, waste acceptance ceased with approximately 838,000 tons of waste landfilled. In March 1989, a Cleanup or Abatement Order (CAO) was issued directing the County to characterize the nature and extent of groundwater and surface water impacts. Since 1989, several orders have been issued by the CCRWQCB and numerous mitigation measures have been implemented by the County in response to these Orders. In June 2021, the CCRWQCB issued a 13267 Order requiring the County to treat groundwater impacted by landfill waste. In October 2021, the CCRWQCB issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) to the County for an incomplete response to the June 2021 Order.

HDR understands that the County is currently addressing the June 2021 Order, the October 2021 NOV, and is compliant with the 2007 Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP). To implement the required responses to these Orders, the County has contracted with Rincon Consultant and SCS Engineers and self-performs selected monitoring and analytical services.

San Luis Obispo County recently withdrew from the Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA). The newly formed Solid Waste Division is currently undertaking certain responsibilities formerly managed by the IWMA, including SB 1383 compliance. HDR further understands that responsibility for the Los Osos Landfill compliance is being transferred to the Solid Waste Division. The County is seeking program management services to address the outstanding Orders and ongoing landfill compliance services, and may essentially utilize this contract as an extension of staff for the Solid Waste Division.

Our PM understands the project objectives set forth in the Request for Proposal and as specified in the WDR and NOV. He has a strong understanding of the regulatory requirements, combined with an understanding of hydrogeology, the interaction of leachate and landfill gas on contaminant fate and transport, groundwater remediation, and Title 27 regulatory expertise.

Our Approach

1. HDR will provide a professional geologist/project manager in Folsom, California, with 30 years of experience working in the environmental consulting practice and experienced in program management and landfill compliance services to serve as a single point of contact for the County.

For over seven years, Charlie served as HDR’s project manager on a USEPA Superfund site in Tracy, California. His responsibilities include directing monthly teleconference calls and quarterly presentations with the Defense Logistics Agency (client), RWQCB, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and the USEPA.

2. HDR’s project manager will be supported by a team of professional engineers, geologists, and scientists with relevant national and international experience; an understanding of monitoring and reporting programs; knowledge of landfill engineering services; and capability in working with the RWQCB.

3. HDR's team members with whom we have experience and trust, will deliver as-needed landfill gas expertise (Tetra Tech) and as-needed field services (JHA) which include groundwater, surface water & landfill gas monitoring, road and cover maintenance, with groundwater and LFG treatment system O&M.

4. Additional HDR staff for emerging contaminants or advanced water treatment, administrative, contracting and subcontract resources have been identified and are available as needed.
#16..
- 1179 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 12 5. A schedule will be developed to keep maintenance, monitoring and reporting tasks on time and on budget.

6. HDR’s standard project management control system will be implemented, and project costs will be tracked in our standard cost reporting system.

7. HDR will hold a kickoff meeting with the County and its consultants to initiate a professional goal-oriented relationship and to develop a team which fully understands key Title 27 compliance issues and “hot buttons” for the RWQCB.

8. HDR understands that the County’s subcontractors and in-house staff are currently responsible for field services, analytical testing and reporting requirements. HDR has teamed with JHA Environmental, Inc. who can provide regular field services and emergency response within 24 hours of notification. HDR has also teamed with Tetra Tech who has staff located in San Luis Obispo and who can provide rapid response as required by the County.

9. HDR will seek opportunities to reduce project costs and maximize communications with the County's team. For example, a project specific SharePoint website or other file sharing service will be established for sharing and storing files. The SharePoint site or other file sharing service will be established with no cost to the County.

Organization of Personnel
Our Staffing section beginning on page 8 presents our proposed organization structure, each person’s role on the project, and our key personnel. It also includes a table summarizing our key personnel’s qualifications, and experience.

Additional information about HDR’s program and project management personnel is presented below.
• Principal-in-Charge: John has over 30 years of experience in various aspects of solid waste management as a consultant and in executive positions for public-sector authorities. John will take ultimate responsibility for project direction, quality, and client satisfaction.
• Project Manager: Charlie has over 30 years of program and project management experience on environmental contracts, including management of work for USEPA, the Department of Defense (DoD), municipal and private clients with oversight by the RWQCB including the San Francisco Bay Region, Central Valley Region and the Central Coast Region. Under his leadership, HDR has received several performance commendations, including “Exceptional” CPARS ratings from the Army and an EPA Region 9 Phoenix Award for outstanding brownfields remediation. Charlie will be responsible for project direction, quality, and client satisfaction. • Technical Staff: HDR’s personnel are highly skilled in their field, having the appropriate education and credentials, as well as extensive experience supporting projects that are directly relevant to the required scope of services. In addition, our key staff have demonstrated their commitment to achieving successful project outcomes and receiving client commendations for their professionalism, competency, and proactive approach to problem solving.

Utilization and Management of Subconsultants
HDR has the in-house capabilities and resources to support the program management services. We have assembled a local team, backed by national professionals, that can provide as-needed support to the County, and we anticipate subcontracting to meet specialty services. For example, analytical testing services may be required for surface water, groundwater, treated water and/or for landfill gas. HDR has relationships with numerous analytical laboratories across the State of California and will select the appropriate laboratory based on the County’s testing needs and schedule. Similarly, surveying services may be required to document wellhead elevations, settlement, or property boundaries. HDR has relationships with several surveyors and will select the appropriate firm depending upon the County's needs and schedule.

HDR's PM will be responsible for subcontracted work. For procurement integrity, HDR uses dedicated procurement staff to prepare subcontractor agreements that clearly state the anticipated scope of services and schedule, establish contact and reporting routes, and provide necessary billing information. As the prime contractor, HDR retains authority, responsibility and accountability for contractor selection, administration, and coordination of work.
#16..
- 1180 -

APPENDIX
Resumes 14
Exceptions & Deviations 42
Required Forms 45
Appendix C - Local Vendor Preference
Appendix D - Risk Assessment Questionnaire
Appendix F - Designation of Subcontractors
Appendix G - Proposer Checklist
#16..
- 1181 -
County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities 14 Appendix: Resumes
We have included 2-page resumes for each key personnel that includes their specific similar project experience, specialty licenses, certificates or other relevant training.

NAME ROLE

PROJECTS

MADERA COUNTY,

SOLID WASTE

MANAGEMENT

CONSULTING

SERVICES

SPSA, REGIONAL

LANDFILL DESIGN
& CONSTRUCTION

ADMINISTRATION

USACE TULSA

DISTRICT,

NORTHERN AREA

GROUNDWATER

RCRA FACILITY

INVESTIGATION

OC WASTE &

RECYCLING,

ORANGE COUNTY

LANDFILLS

COUNTY OF SAN

BERNARDINO

SOLID WASTE

MANAGEMENT

DIVISION, LFGCCS
OM&M
Charlie O’Neill Project Manager;
Regulatory Specialist

John Carlton Principal-in-Charge  
Doug DeCesare Quality Program 
Clayton Mokri Compliance Manager;
Field Programs

Todd Wilson Chemistry/Geochemistry 
Greg Kelly Hydrogeology 
Cindy Liles Air Quality  
May Raad Statistics 
Jeff Murray Engineering Manager  
Joel Miller Landfill Gas 
Salvador Sanchez (JHA) Field Services  
Sami Ayass (Tetra Tech) Landfill Gas Engineering,
Operations & Maintenance
 
The matrix table below cross references relevant projects our team has worked on and aligns with the project references provided in the References section. #16..
- 1182 -
15 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
USACE, Tulsa, Fort Wingate Depot
Activity, McKinley County, NM
Charlie prepared a RCRA-compliant
Corrective Measures Study (CMS)
Work Plan focused on assessment of
remedial alternatives of groundwater
contaminated with nitrate, hexahydro1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5,-triazine (RDX), and perchlorate in shallow and deep aquifers.

Key elements of the Work Plan included:

Install one injection, extraction and
several monitoring wells. Bench scale
testing of multiple microbial substrates
to determine the most effective electron
donor for an in-situ pilot test. Aquifer
pump testing via a step drawdown test,
24-hour constant rate pump test, and
recovery tests to determine site-specific
transmissivity, hydraulic conductivity, and
storativity of both aquifers. Tracer testing
to identify presence of preferential flow
patterns, groundwater flow direction,
and groundwater velocity. Lastly, in-situ
bioremediation remediation pilot testing
to evaluate nitrate, RDX, and perchlorate
degradation rate and treatment efficiency
of the selected electron donor.

Cruickshank Road Illegal Disposal Site -
Landfill Regulatory Compliance, Imperial
County, CA
In response to a NOV, Charlie prepared
a Feasibility Study (FS) to present
comparative order of magnitude costs
for site remediation. The NOV identified
the CRDS as an illegal disposal site and
in violation of 27 CCR 21140 (final cover),
27 CCR 20630 (litter control), 27 CCR
20750 (site maintenance), and 27 CCR
20650 (grading of fill surfaces). The FS
evaluated three alternatives as a decision
tool to facilitate selection of a remedial
approach. The alternatives consisted of
cover the as-is, consolidation and cover,
and removal.

Kiefer Rd Landfill - Water Corrective
Action Cost Estimate, Sacramento
County, CA
Charlie prepared a Water Corrective
Action Cost Estimate for the Sacramento
County’s Kiefer Road Landfill. This
document addressed the water release
corrective action cost estimate in
accordance with the requirements
outlined in 27 CCR §22101(a), §22220-
22222, and §20380(b) for a known
release. The water CACE formed a basis
for an update to the financial assurance
amounts that must be maintained by
the County.

Charlie has more than 30 years of experience planning, managing, and conducting a variety of geologic, hydrogeologic, and environmental investigations. His responsibilities have included project planning, implementation, and management of contaminated soil, groundwater and surface water projects. Charlie has worked on numerous active and closed landfills across California; he is well versed in Title 27 regulations, Waste Discharge Requirements and experienced in working with the Regional Water Quality Control Board on WDR compliance. Charlie has performed a variety of consulting services for private, municipal, state, and federal clients throughout California and Nevada including serving as project manager for task order contracts with the San Francisco Department of Public Works and the Bay Area Rapid Transit District.

EDUCATION
MS, Business
Administration, California
State University, San Jose
BA, Geological Sciences,
University of CA Santa
Barbara

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Geologist,
CA, No. 6401
Enviromental Manager,
NV, No. 2054

INDUSTRY TENURE
33 Years
Charlie O'Neill
Project Manager; Regulatory Specialist
#16..
- 1183 -
16 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

CHARLIE O'NEILL (CONTINUED)
aeration facility had been operating
at the Southeast Regional Landfill in
Fresno County, California. Charlie
documented the system configuration
and effectiveness in accordance with
the RWQCB request and documented
system components, operational history
of the groundwater extraction system,
site geology, aquifer characteristics
and graphically modeled the extraction
systems ability to capture groundwater.

Kinross Gold, USA - CCR Title 27
Groundwater Compliance, Hayden Hill
Mine, Lassen County, CA
Project Manager. In response to
a NOV issued by the CVRWQCB
regarding an incomplete Groundwater
Monitoring Annual Report pursuant
to Title 27 requirements, Charlie
designed and prepared a Water Quality
Protection Standard report screening
27 groundwater constituents to 5 key
indicator parameters. Charlie oversaw
statistical analyses to derive tolerance
limits for each constituent at the
detection monitoring points. He also
provided recommendations to improve
groundwater sampling procedures,
analytical protocols and identified
potential sources of groundwater impact
including surface water impacts to
groundwater and structurally-controlled
poor groundwater quality interpreted as
being impacted with leachate.

Fresno County Department of Public
Works - Evaluation Monitoring Plan,
Southeast Regional Landfill, Fresno, CA
Task Manager. In response to VOC
detections in groundwater monitoring
wells, the CVRWQCB issued a
Cleanup and Abatement Order which
established a schedule for development
and implementation of an Evaluation
Monitoring Plan (EMP) in accordance
with the requirements of 27 CCR
20415. The purpose of the EMP was
to determine if a release had occurred
from the landfill to the groundwater.

Charlie successfully negotiated to
have the EMP extend across four
semiannual monitoring events combined
with substituting outdated laboratory
analytical method (EPA 8010) for a
newer analytical method (EPA 8260).

After 2 years of non-detect results
from all groundwater monitoring wells
at the landfill, the CVRWQCB allowed
the County to return to a detection
monitoring program (27 CCR 20420)
without having to implement a potentially
costly corrective action program.

Fresno County Department of Public
Works - Groundwater Remediation
System Evaluation, Southeast Regional
Landfill Fresno, CA
Task Manager. For over 10 years
a groundwater treatment system
consisting of extraction and monitoring
wells, conveyance piping, and a spray
Bonzi Sanitation Landfill - Landfill
Regulatory Compliance, Modesto, CA
This 128-acre unlined and active inertwaste is landfill located in the flood plain of the Tuolumne River. The groundwater
beneath and down gradient of the Landfill
has been impacted with VOCs, total
dissolved solids, nitrate and metals.

Charlie directed Title 27 compliance for
groundwater monitoring and reporting
and treated water discharged. Tasks
included operation and maintenance
(O&M) of a 100-gallon per minute
groundwater extraction and remediation
system. O&M of landfill gas extraction
wells, flare system and monitoring of
39 landfill perimeter probes. Charlie
was also responsible for the quarterly
sampling of 32 groundwater monitoring
wells, two leachate wells and four public
water supply wells with preparation
of quarterly and annual reports. In
response to a Cleanup and Abatement
Order issued by the CVRWQCB, Charlie
prepared an Evaluation Monitoring
Workplan in accordance with Title 27
Title 27 CCR 20425(d). The purpose of
the Workplan was to assess the vertical
and lateral extent of soil and groundwater
contamination downgradient of the
Landfill and to introduce a conceptual
hydrogeologic model. Charlie worked
extensively with CVRWQCB in revision of
the WDRs interpretation of site data, and
compliance with Title 27 regulations.
#16..
- 1184 -
17 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Madera County, Solid Waste
Management Consulting Services,
Madera County, CA
As Project Manager, John provided a
number of consulting services to Madera
County, including franchise collection
and landfill operations procurements,
operations reviews, financial modeling
and rate recommendations, development
of an organics management plan,
negotiated amendments to landfill and
transfer station operating contracts and
franchise collection agreements. He is
considered an extension of staff and
manages monthly operations meetings,
quarterly financial reviews, and an
annual solid waste workshop with the
Board of Supervisors. John is currently
working with the County to develop
policies, ordinances, franchise agreement
amendments, rate structures, and
programs to help the County comply with
SB 1383.

Mendocino County, Solid Waste
Management Consulting Services,
Mendocino County, CA
As Project Manager, John is acting
as the County’s Solid Waste Director
through this consulting assignment. He
is currently procuring a new franchise
collection contractor, providing facility
and franchise rate reviews, franchise
contract management including
amendments to address new California
regulations (SB 1383), solid waste
records management, and other services
as needed.

Solid Waste Management Consulting
Services, Sonoma County, CA
Project Manager. John is providing
Sonoma County with various consulting
services including helping the County
clarify financial terms of the County
landfill operations contract, evaluating
solid waste collection rate structures, and
other related solid waste matters.

City of Santa Monica, Operational
Analysis and Rate Study, Santa Monica,
CA
Project Manager. John works with the
City and R3 in identifying the City’s
current cost of service, developing
specific budget allocation factors and
structures for the rate model; and
assisting the City in transitioning from
lineitem to program-based budgeting.

City of Suffolk, Transfer Station
Feasibility Study, Suffolk, VA
Project Manager. John assisted the
City of Suffolk with the evaluation of a
potential transfer station for residential
and commercial waste generated
within the City, and possibly the region.

The study involved estimating waste
quantities, transportation and disposal
analysis, permitting, and siting.

John has more than 30 years of experience in all aspects of solid waste management as a consultant and in executive positions for public sector authorities. His strength lies in strategic planning where he has led the solid waste management planning efforts of both small rural communities and large urban cities and counties. In addition to strategic planning, John has significant experience with integrated solid waste management systems, including environmental permitting, landfill and transfer station designs, facility operator procurements, operational reviews, feasibility studies, collection franchising, financial reviews and rate setting, market assessments, and due diligence reviews. John has a strong working knowledge of solid waste management regulations and practices, and has significant experience working with stakeholders, legislators, and regulators.

EDUCATION
BS, Civil and
Environmental
Engineering, Duke
University

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer,
Civil, MD, No. 47291
Professional Engineer,
Civil, NJ, No.
24GE03976100
Professional Engineer, FL,
No. 84409

INDUSTRY TENURE
33 Years
John Carlton
Principal-in-Charge
#16..
- 1185 -
18 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities New York City Dept. of Environmental
Protection, Brookfield Avenue Landfill
(Superfund) Closure and Remediation
Project, Staten Island, NY
Project Manager. For a prior company,
John managed the closure and
remediation design for the closure of
the Brookfield Avenue Landfill. Design
elements included slurry wall design,
leachate collection and control, landfill
gas collection and control, stormwater
management, and final cap design. The
landfill was designed to be beneficially
used as public park.

Delaware Solid Waste Authority,
60-Acre Arear F Landfill Cell Design,
Sandtown, DE
Project Manager. For a prior company,
John managed the design of a 60-acre
landfill cell baseliner. Design elements
included geotechnical investigation,
post-settlement in-gradient liner design,
leachate collection and pumping system.

Detroit Shoreway Community
Development Organization, Compost
Facility Feasibility Study, Cleveland, OH
Project Manager. John was the Project
Manager for a compost facility feasibility
study and operations plan. The project
included identifying commercial organic
waste sources within 10 miles of the
community, evaluating collection systems
for organic waste, evaluating markets for
compost materials in Northeast Ohio,
and developing a conceptual facility plan
with capital and operations costs.

Columbus Consolidated Government,
Summary Strategic Plan, GA
Project Manager. The project included
a review of the Columbus Consolidated
Government’s solid waste operations and
reviewed opportunities for composting,
mixed waste processing, and wastetoenergy and recommendations for future actions.

JOHN CARLTON (CONTINUED)
Division of Solid Waste and Recycling
Services, Hunterdon County Utilities
Authority, NJ
County Solid Waste Director. John
was responsible for the planning and
implementation of the County's solid
waste management system which
included a transfer station, waste
disposal contracts, curbside recycling
collection program, household hazardous
waste collection program, and education
and enforcement program. He oversaw
a staff of 12 and managed a $6 million
annual budget.

Pollution Control Financing Authority of
Warren County, NJ
Executive Director. John provided
executive leadership of Warren County's
integrated solid waste management
system which included a waste-toenergy facility, landfill, recycling program, household hazardous waste collection
program, and education and enforcement
program. He led the strategic planning
for the County's solid waste management
plan. He successfully negotiated
numerous agreements including
labor union, host community, waste
disposal, waste-to-energy, and landfill
gas-to-energy contracts.
#16..
- 1186 -
19 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION
MS, Civil Engineering,
North Carolina State
University
BS, Civil Engineering,
University of North
Carolina Charlotte

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Engineer,
NE, No. E-14357
Professional Engineer,
WY, No. 14738
Professional Engineer, IA,
No. 21143
Professional Engineer,
CO, No. 0051341
Professional Engineer,
VA, No. 038558,

INDUSTRY TENURE
25 years
Southeastern Public Service Authority,
Ongoing Solid Waste Services, VA
Client/Senior Project Manager. HDR
provides ongoing support of the
authority’s landfill and transfer station
operations. Work includes landfill
master planning, permitting, postclosure inspections and monitoring, operational assistance, landfill gas
engineering, facility evaluations and
compliance monitoring. Jeff has also
assisted with technology review and
contracting negotiations with an
alternative waste processing facility,
host community agreement negotiations
and conditional use permit and rezoning
applications for the expansion of the
landfill. Current projects include strategic
communications and engineering to
support the solid waste and wetlands
permitting for over 100 acres of landfill
expansion of its Regional Landfill in
Suffolk Virginia.

City of Billings, Landfill Master Plan, MT
Project Manager. HDR was requested to
update the City of Billings Master Plan
for the operations of the landfill. HDR
incorporated existing changes to the
landfill operation, integrated the Landfill
Drop-off Facility, optimized the life of the
landfill asset, and provided a vision for
the management of the landfill site.

Larimer County Public Works, Regional
Wasteshed Planning Study and
Comprehensive Solid Waste Engineering
Services, CO
Project Manager. HDR was retained to
assist Larimer County and the North
Front Range Regional Wasteshed
Planning Coalition with the development
of a long-term sustainable solid waste
management system. Following the
evaluation and through the adoption of
the Solid Waste Infrastructure Master
Plan, the County is in the process of
implementing the infrastructure for
the future including a transfer station,
new landfill, compost facility (yard and
food waste), and a construction and
demolition debris processing facility.

HDR is currently providing the design
and permitting services for the transfer
station and the landfill.

City of Sioux Falls, Solid Waste
Management Master Plan, SD
Project Manager. The City of Sioux Falls,
South Dakota retained HDR to assist
them with developing a road map for the
future of their solid waste management
system. The City wanted to look down
the road and determine if what may
not make sense today, may make sense
30-40 years from now. As such the
goal of the Solid Waste Management
Master Plan (SWMMP) is to determine
if continued landfilling is going to
remain as their core business or invest
in an alternative emerging technology.

Simultaneously, the existing programs
and facilities of the City were evaluated
for efficiencies and opportunities for
a more comprehensive and integrated
waste management system.

Doug is HDR’s Global Solid Waste Services Director providing technical leadership and resource allocation. He is well-versed in solid waste and environmental projects that include transfer station permitting, MSW and construction and demolition (C&D) landfill permitting and design, leachate collection system design and treatment, MSW and C&D landfill closure design, MSW leachate recirculation system design, MSW landfill gas collection system design, storm water management design, construction administration, and construction quality assurance. For nearly 25 years, Doug has been involved in all aspects of landfills from operations, permitting, design, and construction and understands how the design can impact operations and construction. Doug’s responsibilities include project management, design, preparation of plans and specifications, and construction management.

Doug DeCesare
Quality Program
#16..
- 1187 -
20 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities rain cover to minimize storm water
infiltration into existing cells during and
after construction.

DMASWA, Master Site Development
Plan, IA
Project Manager. The Dubuque
Metropolitan Area Solid Waste Agency
(DMASWA) retained HDR to assist
them with the planning of their landfill
facility. With the landfill having a
permitted capacity of over 50 years,
DMASWA realized a need for a master
plan regarding the infrastructure of the
facility. Aged facilities, site constraints
and challenges, and the potential loss
of the existing entrance due to Iowa
Department of Transportation plans,
there became a need to improve site
operations and facilities now and in the
future. HDR worked with DMASWA to
identify short term and long-term needs
and evaluated operations in developing
a master site development plan that
included new scales and scale house,
residential drop off areas, materials
recovery facility, education center,
landfill gas to energy facility, and a
compost facility. As a result of the master
site development planning process, a
short-term plan was developed that
included an additional scale, scale house
improvements, better queuing, a new
maintenance building, and a small vehicle
user area. Design of these short term
facilities is currently underway.

Metro Park East, which was then followed
by an updated master plan development
for the Phase II active life. HDR developed
the complete design and construction
documents for construction of the Stage 1
final cover project. We also assisted with
the development of design contracts as
well as the bidding phase.

City of Lincoln, Bluff Road Landfill Phase
12 and 13 Expansions, NE
Project Manager. HDR provided design
services for the expansion of the Bluff
Road Landfill into Phase 12 and 13.

Phase 12 and 13 is comprised of 10 and
11 acres, respectively, of Subtitle D liner
system with incorporated environmental
controls such as storm water controls and
groundwater removal system. The design
also focused on minimizing maintenance
and operational costs. In addition to
the development of the construction
contract documents, construction quality
assurance services were provided to
maintain consistency between design
and construction.

Metro Waste Authority, Metro Park East
Landfill Cell C North Design, Permitting,
and Construction, IA
Project Manager. HDR provided
engineering services for design,
permitting, bidding assistance, and
construction contract administration for
the 10-acre Cell C North liner, leachate
system, and groundwater underdrain
construction project. Project work also
included the innovative design features
of temporary rain flaps and geosynthetic
Republic/Allied, King and Queen
Landfill, VA
Project Manager. HDR provided
permitting assistance, developed
construction documents for landfill
expansions and closures, and provided
operational assistance, including air
space budget analysis and development
plans for the facility located in Little
Plymouth, VA.

Republic, Old Dominion Landfill, VA
Project Manager. HDR prepared air
budget models, provided permitting for
ash recycling/processing at the landfill,
and prepared updates to the operational
manual to comply with regulatory
updates for the facility located in Henrico,
VA.

Republic/Allied, Brunswick Waste
Management Facility, VA
Project Manager. HDR provided
permitting assistance, developed
construction documents for landfill
expansions and closures, landfill gas
collection expansions, developed
borrow areas, and provided operational
assistance in the form of air budget
analysis and preparation of development
plans for the facility located in
Lawrenceville, VA.

Metro Waste Authority, Metro Park East
Phase II Vertical Expansion, Closure, and
Master Plan Update, IA
Project Engineer. At project outset, HDR
provided the conceptual design and
final cover system options evaluation for

DOUG DECESARE (CONTINUED)
#16..
- 1188 -
21 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Stephen is a Certified Industrial Hygienist with over 30 years of experience managing or consulting in occupational safety and health to private industries and government agencies. His skills and abilities include: Evaluating the work environment for recognizable health and safety hazards that adversely impact the work environment and employee health. Developing solutions in a coordinated effort with clients to protect the health and welfare of all personnel while working within the client resource means. Conducting gap analysis workplace evaluations of the client's programs and working with the client to develop and implement policies and programs to advance their health and safety programs. Training employees in a variety of health and safety topics.

Defense Logistics Agency, Installation
Operations for Distribution,
Environmental Compliance
Assessments
Environmental Assessor. Provided
environmental regulatory compliance
support to the environmental office
for DLA Installation Operations for
Distribution. Responsible for conducting
assessments and preparing reports of
environmental assessments results. The
environmental assessment encompassed
13 different environmental protocols
in addition to applicable local and
state regulations. The Environmental
compliance assessments were conducted
at DLA Distribution Centers in Pearl
Harbor, HI, and Norfolk Virginia.

Defense Logistics Agency Distribution
San Joaquin, CA; Baseline Facility
Risk Assessments
Conducted baseline risk assessments
for all Distribution facilities using the
DLA Distribution Center Environmental
Safety and Occupational health
Management System guidance. Each
facility was visually assessed to identify
safety and health risks to occupants
over 15 protocols and the results were
documented on the 202S–F2 forms.

A risk assessment code was then
determined for each of the 15 protocols
for each facility and documented
on the 202S-F3 forms. Baseline risk
assessments were completed for
19 buildings.

Defense Logistics Agency
Distribution San Joaquin, CA; Hazard
Communication Program Revision
Lead Industrial Hygienist. Evaluated
and revised the Hazard Communication
Program for Installation Operations
at San Joaquin. The revisions were
intended to update the program and
establish procedures as they are currently
incorporated at the San Joaquin depot.

The program was updated to include
the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration Hazard Communication
requirement as well as specific DLA
Distribution Hazard Communication
program requirements.

U.S. Army National Guard;
Environmental Program Assessment
System (EPAS), MS
Stephen held the position of team
lead for the hazardous waste protocol.

Tasks included, but were not limited to,
researching regulatory requirements
prior to the site visit, conducting
daily assessments of activities and
operations, entering findings into a
standardized database, conducting
daily briefings of preliminary findings to
base representatives, and preparing a
final report.

EDUCATION
BS, Industrial Hygiene,
Colorado State University

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATIONS
Certified Industrial
Hygienist, CO, No. 6541
CP
Certified Asbestos
Inspector, CO, No.
44789610

INDUSTRY TENURE
36Years
Stephen Coffee
Safety Program
#16..
- 1189 -
22 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities Marine Corp Air Station (MCAS) Facility
Condition Assessment Cherry Point, NC
Lead Safety Assessor. Evaluated the
physical condition of buildings 137,
245, and 4035 to assist in determining
whether the buildings can be renovated
or should be replaced. Evaluation
included a detailed assessment of
all walking and working surfaces for
compliance with OSHA regulations.

Noncompliance issues were addressed
in a report provided to the MCAS and
HDR Engineering.

STEPHEN COFFEE (CONTINUED)
Defense Logistics Agency Installation
Management for Distribution, Industrial
Hygiene Survey
Lead Industrial Hygienist. Evaluated
the environment for total airborne
particulates in warehouse 148. Area air
samples and personal air samples were
collected over two days to measure the
concentration of airborne particulates
as well as employee exposure to
airborne particulates. This survey
was follow-up survey to a previous
industrial hygiene survey to compare
results for seasonal variability. Results
were provided in a detailed report with
corrective action recommendations.

Additionally, a dust hazard analysis
was conducted for operations at the
carpentry shop in building 150, and
metal cutting operations in building 147
and 148. These areas were evaluated
to determine if there is a potential for a
combustible atmosphere and potential
for an explosive atmosphere. Samples
were collected for wood dust and metal
dust created by these operations to
evaluate their characteristics for a class II
combustible atmosphere.

Fairbanks North Star Borough Solid
Waste Landfill, Respiratory Protection
Program Update
Developed a hazard assessment specific
to site conditions for the FNSB solid
waste landfill. The hazard assessment is
to be included into the FNSB solid waste
landfill Respiratory Protection Program to
provide guidance for selecting the proper
respiratory protection for employees
potentially exposed to different chemical
inhalation hazards.

U.S. Army National Guard;
Environmental Program Assessment
System (EPAS), NV
Lead Environmental Assessor.

Responsibilities include conducting
field audits; researching federal, state,
and local regulations; determining
root causes; and developing corrective
actions. Performed assessments at
6 ARNG facilities within the State of
Nevada. Facilities assessed included
armories and wheeled and tracked
vehicle maintenance shops. EPAS
assesses compliance with the following
environmental regulations: RCRA
Subpart C,D, and I; CWA; EPCRA; NEPA;
NHPA; CERCLA/SARA; SDWA; TSCA;
FIFRA; and other federal, state, and
local regulations.
#16..
- 1190 -
23 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
USACE, Tulsa, Fort Wingate Depot
Activity, McKinley County, NM
Facility Investigation at the 800-acre
decommissioned munitions storage
and disposal facility. The 7-month
groundwater RFI field program consisted
of collection of 68 soil gas samples
for VOC analysis, installation of 32
groundwater monitoring wells, collection
of groundwater samples for VOC
and explosives analysis, slug testing
of 14 wells to assess hydrogeologic
characteristics, and the statistical
analysis of existing groundwater
analytical results to determine the
background concentrations of naturally
occurring compounds. The data was
compiled into a report to presenting the
magnitude and extent of contamination
in the shallow and deep aquifers
and the potential for hydrogeologic
communication between the shallow and
deep aquifers.

Cruickshank Road Illegal Disposal Site -
Landfill Regulatory Compliance, Imperial
County, CA
After receipt of a notice of violation,
Imperial County contracted with HDR to
prepare a Feasibility Study (FS) to present
comparative order of magnitude cost for
the remediation if the Cruickshank Road
Disposal Site (CRDS) located in Imperial
County, California. The NOV identified
the CRDS as an illegal disposal site and
in violation of 27 CCR 21140 (final cover),
27 CCR 20630 (litter control), 27 CCR
20750 (site maintenance), and 27 CCR
20650 (grading of fill surfaces). The FS
evaluated three alternatives as a decision
tool to facilitate selection of a remedial
approach in response to the NOV. The
alternatives consisted of complete cover
the waste, consolidation of the waste, and
clean closure. Based on the results from
the feasibility study, Clayton prepared
a work plan that identified methods
to characterize, excavate, dispose and
confirm achievement of clean closure at
the illegal disposal site.

Holt of California, Pleasant Grove, CA
Clayton performed groundwater
monitoring and reporting in accordance
with the Monitoring and Reporting
Program and compliance sampling for
the land based discharge of treated
wastewater in accordance with the
Waste Discharge Requirements order.

Risk modeling and coordination with
the Central Valley Regional Water
Quality Control Board was successful
at achieving site closure with residual
contaminants in groundwater three
orders of magnitude greater than
cleanup goals.

Clayton has over 20 years of experience in the environmental industry throughout the United States and internationally. He has managed crews with multi-disciplined trades, skilled laborers and professionals. His experience includes completing Phase I/ II environmental site assessments, human health risk assessments, monitoring reports, feasibility studies, permitting (NPDES, SPCC, SMARA, encroachment, and WDR) five-year reviews, work plans, closure reports, land use covenants, vapor intrusion risk assessments, contaminant management plans, and contaminated material construction specifications. He is also knowledgeable in the use of Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) model, Johnson/Ettinger, EPA VISL, Bioscreen, and ProUCL.

EDUCATION
BS, Environmental
Science, University of
California, Davis

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Environmental
Manager, No. 421492

INDUSTRY TENURE
18 Years
Clayton Mokri
Compliance Manager; Field Programs
#16..
- 1191 -
24 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

CLAYTON MOKRI (CONTINUED)
Agrium U.S., Inc., West Sacramento, CA
Clayton manages compliance with the
Monitoring and Reporting Program,
operation of the groundwater extraction
system, and reporting to the local
publicly owned treatment works. To
remediate the perched aquifer, HDR
installed a 240-foot long extraction
trench that discharges to the POTW.

Routine semiannual groundwater
monitoring is performed to document
changes in perched and confined aquifer
groundwater conditions. In 2010 Clayton
developed and implemented a bromide
tracer study to potentially identify a
damaged groundwater monitoring well
which could be increasing the confined
aquifer contamination. The results from
the bromide tracer study were presented
to the client with a recommendation
to abandon the well and eliminate this
migration pathway.

Kiefer Road Landfill - Water Corrective
Action Cost Estimate, Sacramento
County, CA
Clayton assisted in the preparation of a
Water Corrective Action Cost Estimate
for the Sacramento County’s Kiefer Road
Landfill. This document was prepared
to address the water release corrective
action cost estimate in accordance
with the requirements outlined in 27
CCR §22101(a), §22220- 22222, and
§20380(b) for a known release. The
water corrective action cost estimate
forms a basis for an update to the
financial assurance amounts that were
maintained by the County.

Campbell Soup Supply Company, Dixon,
CA
Clayton performed management and
reporting tasks to comply with the
Waste Discharge Requirements and
Monitoring and Reporting Program for
the land based process water discharge.

Reporting activities include quarterly
reporting to the Title 27 enforcement
group, calculation of the upper tolerance
level for background groundwater quality
and antidegradation analysis. Statistical
analysis of background groundwater
quality was successful at establishing
groundwater quality limitations greater
than documented in the Waste Discharge
Requirements order.

Beale AFB, Landfill 2 and Landfill 3, CA
Clayton directed the Title 27 compliance
monitoring and reporting activities for
Landfill 2 and Landfill 3 at Beale AFB.

These tasks included quarterly landfill
gas monitoring and reporting to the
local oversight agency, semiannual
groundwater monitoring and reporting to
the Central Valley Regional Water Quality
Control Board, surface water sampling
and reporting, landfill subsidence
repairs. Additional activities included the
installation of groundwater monitoring
wells and soil gas probes. During the
ongoing monitoring and reporting
activities Clayton was present during
local oversight agency inspections and
routinely corresponded with the Central
Valley Regional Water Quality Control
Board to confirm compliance with Title
27 and Waste Discharge Requirements.

McClellan AFB, OUD and OUB Landfill
Caps, CA
Clayton was responsible for managing
and conducting cap maintenance for two
landfill caps. This included attending
quarterly inspections with the Local
Oversight Agency and correcting
items noted during the inspections:
such as, damages to the asphalt cap,
maintenance/sampling of PCB filter,
subsidence repair, and fire prevention.

Clayton was responsible to preparing
quarterly reports documenting these
activities for submittal to the local
oversight agency.
#16..
- 1192 -
25 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
USACE, Tulsa, Fort Wingate Depot
Activity, McKinley County, NM
Facility Investigation at the 800-acre
decommissioned munitions storage
and disposal facility. The 7-month
groundwater RFI field program consisted
of collection of 68 soil gas samples
for VOC analysis, installation of 32
groundwater monitoring wells, collection
of groundwater samples for VOC
and explosives analysis, slug testing
of 14 wells to assess hydrogeologic
characteristics, and the statistical
analysis of existing groundwater
analytical results to determine the
background concentrations of naturally
occurring compounds. The data was
compiled into a report to presenting the
magnitude and extent of contamination
in the shallow and deep aquifers
and the potential for hydrogeologic
communication between the shallow and
deep aquifers.

HDR/OBG Joint Venture, Iowa Avenue
Site Assessment, Fort Leavenworth
(U.S. Army), Leavenworth, KS
Field Supervisor/Chemist. HDR
performed the investigation and
characterization of the five-acre Iowa
Avenue Site at Fort Leavenworth as
well as the subsequent reporting in a
RCRA Facility Investigation/Corrective
Measures Study (RFI/CMS). This
site assessment was needed so that
military housing can be constructed in
this area. The investigation included
the investigation of a former firing
range, potential disposal and burn
areas using geophysical methods and
confirmation with direct push sampling,
excavation and collection of samples for
verification. Todd wrote the health and
safety and sampling plans and led all
field investigation activities for the RFI
and CMS.

Air Force Civil Engineering Center,
TO175 Site Investigation and
Remediation at Jet Fuel Off Loading
General Mitchell Field, Air National
Guard, Milwaukee, WI; General (Billy)
Mitchell Field, Milwaukee, WI
Chemist – QC. HDR provided A-E
Services supporting fuel release response
actions at the Jet Fuel Offloading Facility
Wisconsin Air National Guard (ANG)
128th Air Refueling Wing (ARW) and
the supporting infrastructure located
at General Mitchell Field ANGB in
accordance with Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources (WDNR) rules
regulations requirements and guidance.

Contaminant exceedances were
identified during previous investigations
at three separate locations in the
vicinity of the Fuels Facility. Completed
data validation for multiple rounds of
groundwater sampling events.

EDUCATION
MS, Pharmaceutical
Science, University
of Nebraska, Medical
Center
BS, Chemistry, University
of Nebraska, Lincoln

CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Hazardous
Materials Manager, No.
16371
Water Well Monitoring
Technician, NE, No.
79506

INDUSTRY TENURE
30 Years
Todd has 30 years of experience performing chemical sampling, testing, and analysis of wastes in addition to completing field audits and review of laboratory Chemical Quality Assurance and Health and Safety requirements. Todd prepares Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPP), Sampling and Analysis Plans (SAP), and Field Sampling Plan (FSP) for HTRW Environmental Restoration Contracts. He investigates, analyzes, directs, and manages investigations of site operations to determine the presence and concentration of toxic and hazardous chemicals. He evaluates innovative technologies (including natural attenuation and in situ technologies) for applications in the remediation of HTRW sites and assists in the design of bench- and pilot-scale remediation systems to determine applicability of the technology(ies) for full scale remediation of HTRW sites.

Todd Wilson
Chemistry/Geochemistry
#16..
- 1193 -
26 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

TODD WILSON (CONTINUED)
Duke Energy, Allen Steam Station
Ash Basin Groundwater Assessment,
Gaston, Charlotte and Mecklenburg, NC
Chemist – QC/Validation. HDR has
developed a groundwater monitoring
program for ash basins located at
the Allen Steam Station as well as
six other Duke Energy fossil station
(Allen Station, Belews, Buck, Cliffside,
Dan River, Marshall, and Riverbend).

Responsibilities include determination
of waste and compliance boundaries
selecting locations for groundwater
monitoring wells developing sampling
and analysis plans technical support
for the installation of wells support
for discussions with North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural
Resources on groundwater modeling,
geochemical modeling (PHREEQC), and
performed data validation and QC for
multiple rounds of groundwater sampling
at seven Duke Energy facilities.

USEPA Region 2, Remedial Action
Contract, Ellenville Scrap Iron and Metal
Superfund Site, Ellenville, NY
Chemist – QC/Validation. HDR
provided quality control support for
development of the UFP-QAPP for predesign investigation (PDI) of a five-acre unlined landfill which was impacted with
metals, SVOCs, and PCBs. PDI delineated
extent of soil contamination with an
optimized two-tier soil sampling protocol.

Coordinated data validation with the EPA
DESA Laboratory and verified validated
data with the UFP-QAPP.

Deluxe Corp., Portland Groundwater
Monitoring, Beaverton, WA and OR
Project Chemist/Validation. Performed
data validation in accordance with the
EPA National Functional Guidelines for
organic and inorganic data.

Barrick Gold Corporation, Barrick
Homestake Mining Site, Acomita and
Cibola, NM; Homestake and Jefferson,
MT
Project Chemist/Validation. Completed
data evaluation/validation to determine
if piles of materials exceeded regulatory
criteria, and determine if additional soil
and groundwater data were required
based on NRC and EPA criteria.
#16..
- 1194 -
27 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Greg is an environmental Program Manager and Senior Hydrogeologist with 33 years of experience in investigative hydrogeology at CERCLA, RCRA, and commercial hazardous-waste sites. He has successfully managed environmental projects for a diverse range of clients including AFCEE, USACE, USAEC, USCG, and DOE at numerous military installations in Alaska, California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

USACE, Tulsa District, Northern Area
Groundwater Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility
Investigation (RFI), Fort Wingate Depot
Activity (FWDA), NM
Field Manager for a RCRA Facility
Investigation at the 800-acre
decommissioned munitions storage
and disposal facility to characterize
six groundwater plumes consisting of
nitrate/nitrite, perchlorate, explosives,
and 1,2-dichloroethane contaminants
in alluvial and bedrock aquifers. The
7-month RFI field program consisted
of collection of 68 soil vapor samples
for VOC analysis utilizing portable
gas chromatography instrumentation
(HAPSITE), drilling and installation
of 35 groundwater monitoring wells
using sonic and hollow-stem auger
methods, collection of groundwater
samples, slug testing of 14 wells to
assess hydrogeologic properties,
and the statistical analysis of
existing groundwater analytical
results to determine the background
concentrations of naturally occurring
compounds. The data were compiled
into a report to assess the magnitude
and nature and extent of contamination
and the potential for hydrogeologic
communication between the shallow and
deep aquifers.

Feather River West Levee, Sutter
County, CA
Greg provided construction management
quality oversight for the Sutter Butte
Flood Control Agency for a 10,000 foot
long levee improvement project along
the west side of the Feather River, Sutter
County, CA. The levee improvement
project entailed degrading of the previous
levee to widen the working surface,
and trenching to approximately 65 feet
to install an impermeable cut-off wall
within the levee and then reconstructing
the levee to meet protectiveness for
a 200-year flood recurrence interval.

His responsibilities included oversight
of contractor activities, submittal of
daily and weekly progress reports,
and verifying that contracted tasks
were implemented.

Defense Logistics Agency, Military
Construction Site Characterization
Studies, Hill AFB, UT
Technical Lead for HDR’s preparation of
planning documents and the investigation
and assessment of land proposed by DLA
for the expansion of warehousing space
to maintain mission readiness. Conducts
research of historical environmental
background documentation and
interviews site personnel to assess
the potential presence of hazardous
materials / wastes that could pose a
risk to construction workers and future
site personnel. Field work consists of
collecting soil and soil gas samples from
soil borings using direct push technology
drilling equipment. Analyses include
volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
semi-volatile organic compounds
(SVOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs), metals, and Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (TPH) – diesel range
organics (DRO) and gasoline range
organics (GRO).

EDUCATION
BA, Geology, University
of Northern Colorado
Graduate Studies,
Civil Engineering/
Hydrogeology, Colorado
State University
BS, Network and
Database Administration,
Metropolitan State
Univeristy of Denver

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Professional
Geologist, WY, No. PG1680

INDUSTRY TENURE
32 Years
Greg Kelly
Hydrogeology
#16..
- 1195 -
28 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

GREG KELLY (CONTINUED)
USACE, Tulsa District, Proposed Plan
(PP) and Record of Decision (ROD);
Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant
(LHAAP), Karnack, TX
Task manager for preparation of CERCLA
Decision Documents, including a
Proposed Plan and Record of Decision
at 1 of 3 sites at LHAAP. Responsibilities
include technical writing and review,
participating in meetings and conference
calls with the USACE, BRAC Program
Manager, and regulatory agency
representatives. Also responsible
for preparing and distributing public
notifications and coordinating and
presenting Proposed Plan at a public
meeting. Coordinate with other task
managers to provide technical support
and technical review for the documents
for the other 2 sites that are part of
the contract. Decision documents
required becoming familiar with
numerous documents for environmental
investigations, and actions, previous
decisions, and other issues related
to LHAAP. Soil and groundwater
contamination from explosives,
perchlorate, and VOCs (including DNAPL
methylene chloride) require cleanup.

The decision documents describe the
preferred remedy as excavation and offsite disposal for soil, and in-situ thermal desorption and monitored natural
attenuation for groundwater cleanup.

Feather River West Levee Slurry Wall
Installation and Phase I ESA, Sutter &
Butte Counties, CA
In 2017 as a Senior Geologist, Greg
oversaw trench logging operations and
installation of an 80 foot deep slurry
wall to fortify portions of the levee
west of the Feather River. During prior
work in 2012 – 2014, Greg served as
a Senior Technical Reviewer providing
technical review on the project approach,
reporting and document review functions
for preparation of a Phase I ESA along
a 40-mile segment of the Feather
River West Levee located in Sutter
and Butte Counties, California. The
ASTM 1527-13 compliant Phase I ESA
Phase I ESA was performed to assess
environmental liabilities associated with
levee rehabilitation which will result
in an increased levee footprint and
increased maintenance easements. Land
use included agricultural, residential,
commercial and industrial with over
1,000 individual parcels.

Defense Logistics Agency, Military
Construction Site Characterization
Studies, Fort Carson, CO
Technical Lead for HDR’s investigation
and assessment of land proposed by DLA
for the expansion of warehousing space
to maintain mission readiness. Conducts
research of historical environmental
background documentation and
interviews site personnel to assess
the potential presence of hazardous
materials / wastes that could pose a risk
to construction workers and future site
personnel. Environmental conditions
were assessed by collecting soil and
soil gas samples from soil borings
using direct push technology drilling
equipment. Analyses include volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), metals,
and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(TPH) – diesel range organics (DRO)
and gasoline range organics (GRO).

Responsible for work plan development,
field sampling activities, and final
SCS reporting.
#16..
- 1196 -
29 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Southeastern Public Service Authority,
Ongoing Solid Waste Services, VA
Client/Senior Project Manager. HDR
provides ongoing support of the
authority’s landfill and transfer station
operations. Work includes landfill
master planning, permitting, postclosure inspections and monitoring, operational assistance, landfill gas
engineering, facility evaluations and
compliance monitoring. Jeff has also
assisted with technology review and
contracting negotiations with an
alternative waste processing facility,
host community agreement negotiations
and conditional use permit and rezoning
applications for the expansion of the
landfill. Current projects include strategic
communications and engineering to
support the solid waste and wetlands
permitting for over 100 acres of landfill
expansion of its Regional Landfill in
Suffolk Virginia.

Madera County, Solid Waste
Management Consulting Services,
Madera County, CA
The County contracted HDR to provide
a number of solid waste management
consulting services, including:
• Conducting monthly operations
meetings to review the operations
of the landfill, transfer station, and
collection franchises
• Performing quarterly financial reviews
to provide guidance on the financial
performance of the system
• Developing an Organic Waste
Management Plan
• Holding an annual Board of
Supervisors Solid Waste Workshop to
update the elected County leadership
on the solid waste system
• Assisting in negotiating amendments
to the various private contractor
agreements including franchise
collections and facility operations.

Transfer Station Design, McCourtney
Road Transfer Station, CA
HDR was retained to design a new
transfer station to replace the aged and
undersized facility in Nevada County, CA.

The new facility design includes a new
entrance road, a scale plaza including
four new scales and six lanes of queuing,
a new 48,000 square foot transfer
station building and refurbishment of the
existing transfer facility into an Organics
receiving and transfer facility. Cindy’s role
in this project is to assist with the review
of design documents and lead the solid
waste facility permit revision efforts.

The latter entails updating the facility’s
Transfer Processing Report to match the
approved CEQA/MND documents as
well as current facility operations.

Request for Proposals for Collection
Services, Mendocino County, CA
The County of Mendocino sought
assistance in the preparation of an RFP
for collection services for one of their
franchise areas. Due to the existing

EDUCATION
MS, Environmental
Engineering, California
State University, Fullerton
BS, Environmental
Sciences, University of
California, Riverside

CERTIFICATIONS
Qualified Industrial
Stormwater Practioner
(QISP), No. 00176
Certified Air Permitting
Professional (CAPP), No.
1106

INDUSTRY TENURE
7 Years
Cindy Liles has seven years of experience working with the waste industry. She started off her career implementing organics separation and compost workshops at her University and has since worked on over 175 waste projects. In California, she has worked with over 75 different waste-related facilities. This includes work on the design, permitting, development, and/or environmental compliance of over a dozen organic waste processing facilities and several feasibility studies for both the public and private sectors.

She also helped secure several grants amounting to over $5 million for compost infrastructure and research, and over $10 million for renewable energy projects. Cindy has been helping jurisdictions understand SB 1383's implications on their franchise agreements, collection methods, infrastructure capacity, landfill diversion, and procurement procedures.

Cindy Liles
Air Quality
#16..
- 1197 -
30 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

CINDY LILES (CONTINUED)
meant creating a robust stormwater
program, identifying and selecting Best
Management Practices (BMPs), and
getting quickly up to speed on the new
sampling, monitoring, and reporting
requirements. During this transition,
Cindy worked with over 50 unique
facilities to enroll in the IGP and develop
a site-specific SWPPP. Over the past
five years, she has continued managing
roughly 30 facilities on-going compliance,
conducting site evaluations, preparing
SWPPP revisions, and responding to
violations and threats of litigation.

Climate Smart San Jose Zero Waste
Element. City of San Jose, CA
As part of their Climate Smart Initiative,
the City of San Jose expanded their
research and analysis into achieving zero
waste. Cindy acted as Project Manager
for HDR’s role on the project. HDR
evaluated waste processing systems, new
and emerging technologies, and hard-torecycle materials programs. The team identified the most sustainable waste
management practices, viable processing
systems for various waste streams, and
methods for improving the reduce and
reuse behavioral programs.
term procurement. Key components
included data exchange, unit conversion,
and communication.

Integrated Organics Recycling Facility
Permitting. West Coast Waste, Fresno,
CA
The project consisted of expanding an
existing chip/grind facility to include
a material recovery facility, transfer
station, covered composting system,
and an anaerobic digestion facility.

Cindy acted as Project Manager through
the Conditional Use Permit/Mitigated
Negative Declaration process with the
Lead Agency and obtaining a full Solid
Waste Facility Permit. This work included
design considerations, plan preparation,
and report generation. The project team
crafted, issued, and managed a Request
for Proposals to anaerobic digestion
technology vendors which ultimately led
to the selection of a preferred vendor
to work on the next stages of facility
development. The next phase of the
project involved soliciting bids from
gasification technology vendors, which
again led to the selection of a preferred
vendor to work on the next stages of
the facility.

Over 50+ Facilities. IGP Compliance.

Los Angeles, Orange, & Santa Barbara
Counties, CA
In 2015, the revised CA Stormwater
IGP came into effective which required
all enrolled facilities to revamp their
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans
(SWPPPs). For most facilities, this
contract’s expiration date, the County
was on an aggressive timeline to prepare
the RFP, draft a new franchise agreement,
and outreach to the local haulers.

Cindy took lead on the preparation of
the new franchise agreement to verify
it was compliant with SB 1383 as well
as included the necessary standard
County language.

SMART Station Update. City of
Sunnyvale, CA
Cindy assisted the City of Sunnyvale
and Bay Counties Waste Service in
the evaluation of the MRF’s existing
equipment and outreaching to equipment
vendors. HDR was tasked with narrowing
the scope for equipment replacement and
repairs, obtaining a cost estimate from
equipment vendors, and evaluating each
response for accuracy and completeness.

This also involved identifying the most
appropriate vendors to participate in the
solicitation and working with the vendors
to verify the requested information was
provided in a timely manner.

SB 1383 Procurement Assessment.

County of Los Angeles, Public Works,
Los Angeles, CA
In response to draft SB 1383 regulations,
Cindy led LA County’s first organic waste
product procurement assessment. This
involved an in-depth understanding of SB
1383 requirements, eligible organic waste
products, and LA County’s available
outlets. All viable options were evaluated
to understand the most viable options
for the County’s short-term and long-
#16..
- 1198 -
31 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
USACE - Tulsa District, Northern Area
Groundwater RCRA, CA
USACE contracted with HDR to replace
an incumbent contractor at the Fort
Wingate Depot Activity (FWDA). This
project demonstrates ability to complete
a large and complex field and reporting
program for a complex groundwater
characterization at an existing RCRA
site. The characterization consisted of
implementing a Remedial Investigation
(RI), at an 800-acre, high elevation
desert facility for multiple contaminants
in multiple aquifers, impacting soil gas,
soil, and groundwater.

Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Government of the
Northwest Territories, Workshop on
Evaluating Water Quality Samples for
Trends and Exceedances
HDR was hired to conduct a workshop
to train government of Alberta and
Northwest Territories staff on statistical
approaches to establish background
concentration levels and ascertain as
new samples are collected during the
compliance period whether exceedances
have occurred and/or trends of
increasing concentrations are statistically
significant. Topics included dealing with
non-detects in background and test
samples, issues arising from seasonality
and autocorrelation, how to determine
outliers, upper prediction limits for one
or multiple test comparisons, parametric
and non-parametric tests which detect
differences in population means and
which can test for significant in trends
and the use of control charts to detect
trend and exceedances. In addition to
the workshop, HDR updated seasonal,
site-specific water quality triggers and
objectives (SSWQOs) for 70 parameters
which it had developed in 2015 for data
from two different rivers from the period
of 1972 to 2012. The updated triggers and
objectives were referenced during the
workshop exercises.

Xcel Energy, Statistical Method
Certification for Compliance with the
Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Rule,
CO
This Statistical Method Certification
document provides the procedures
for data management, validation, and
analysis for the data generated during
groundwater monitoring at the Public
Service Company of Colorado’s (PSCo)
power generating stations with active
Coal Combustion Residual (CCR) units:

Cherokee, Comanche, Hayden, Pawnee,
and Valmont. PSCo is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Xcel Energy. Each of
PSCo’s coal power– generating stations
must comply with the EPA’s final Coal
Combustion Residuals Rule. Groundwater
monitoring of active CCR units is an
integral part of compliance with the
CCR Rule.

EDUCATION
MS, Mathematics,
Dalhousie University
BS, Mathematics,
Dalhousie University

CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Statistician,
Statistical Society of
Canada

INDUSTRY TENURE
28 Years
May has 28 years of experience in statistical and analytical fields. She is HDR’s Principal Statistician and a Professional Associate with her specialization in statistics. Her expertise spans the a large range of statistical approaches such as regression, multivariate analysis, experimental design, predictive risk modelling and implementation of analytics processes which is vital in today’s world of massive or big data. May complements the results of her statistical tests with graphical analysis. She is experienced with statistical software applications such as SAS, SPSS, Stata, JMP, Eviews and NCSS on her many and varied statistical projects and surveys. Her versatility and breadth of experience in the statistical and scientific fields provide her with the best and latest methods to quantitatively and objectively measure impacts of an agency’s procedures, policies or regulations.

May Raad
Statistics
#16..
- 1199 -
32 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

MAY RAAD (CONTINUED)
Alberta Environment, South
Saskatchewan Regional Plan Surface
Water Quality Management (WQMF
Statistical Methods
HDR was retained to produce
recommendations and examples of
statistical methods to help detect and
assess changes to ambient river water
quality relative to identified WQMF
trigger and limit values. HDR reviewed
and prepared a database of over twenty
years of monthly chemical and flow
parameters from over 200 monitoring
stations located at four targeted river
basins. Data mining techniques were
used to understand the nature of outliers
and missing data. Advanced statistical
tests such as the Seasonal Kendall
Tau, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s tests
were used to determine when trends
in chemical observations are changing
over time. HDR conducted a workshop
with the AENV team to train staff on the
recommended methods and approaches.

All recommendations were documented
in a detailed statistical report.

FedEx Ground, Environmental Services,
Allentown Regional Distribution Center,
Pennsylvania
HDR conducted a statistical evaluation
of existing soil boring arsenic data
for the purpose of determining
the relationship between arsenic
concentrations with increasing depth. If
arsenic concentrations are decreasing
as depth increases, then anthropogenic
activity may have introduced arsenic
onto the site. If the reverse trend is true,
then arsenic is present due to natural
reasons. HDR used ordinary least
squares regression to relate the variation
in arsenic concentrations across the 17
different boring locations to variation in
depth. Prior to conducting the regression
analysis, HDR converted the depth
categories to numeric representations
by selecting the mid-point of each depth
category. Spatial variability resulting from
taking samples at different locations on
the acreage was addressed by including
indicator variables. Each indicator
variable denoted a set of geographically
related boring locations. The statistical
methodology and findings were
summarized in a technical memorandum
and presented to the client.

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Ash Basin/
Ash Dike Engineering Support, NC
HDR is providing comprehensive
engineering, environmental, and
permitting services in support of Duke
Energy’s steam stations and combined
cycle combustion turbine projects that
feature ash dikes and/or ash basins.

Included in this work is the development
of methodologies to determine
background well groundwater quality
objectives and analyses of water quality
samples from compliance wells. HDR’s
analyses cover seven sites in total: Dan
River, Marshall, Riverbend, Buck, Belews,
Allen and Cliffside steam station sites.

HDR is preparing results on behalf of
Duke for both state level corrective action
plan reports (CAP) and federal level
Coal Combustions Residuals Rule (CCR)
reports. Techniques used to establish
background concentration levels and/or
exceedances include but are not limited
to tests for outliers (Dixon’s, Rosner’s,
Tukey-fences), serial correlations, spatial
variability, graphical analyses, tests for
distributions such as normal, gamma
and lognormal, non-detects imputation
and upper prediction limits. Trend
analyses and tests for population means
differences employ either parametric or
nonparametric methods depending on
each sample’s distributional properties.

Examples are maximum likelihood
regression with/without non-detects,
Mann-Kendall trend analyses, and t-tests
and Kruskal-Wallis tests for differences
across populations.
#16..
- 1200 -
33 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Southeastern Public Service Authority,
Ongoing Solid Waste Services, VA
Client/Senior Project Manager. HDR
provides ongoing support of the
authority’s landfill and transfer station
operations. Work includes landfill
master planning, permitting, postclosure inspections and monitoring, operational assistance, landfill gas
engineering, facility evaluations and
compliance monitoring. Jeff has also
assisted with technology review and
contracting negotiations with an
alternative waste processing facility,
host community agreement negotiations
and conditional use permit and rezoning
applications for the expansion of the
landfill. Current projects include strategic
communications and engineering to
support the solid waste and wetlands
permitting for over 100 acres of landfill
expansion of its Regional Landfill in
Suffolk Virginia.

I-95 Landfill and I-66 Landfill, LFG
Permitting and Investigations, Fairfax
County, VA
Senior Project Manager. Jeff managed
the investigation of landfill gas migration
from the I-95 Landfill in Fairfax, Virginia
toward an adjacent privately owned solid
waste facility. This work has included
development and implementation of
a sampling plan, evaluation of landfill
gas data within the collection system
and at migration probe locations to
determine potential migration pathways
and likely sources, assessment of
supplemental probe. Recent projects
include preparation of updates to the
facilities landfill gas management plans
and design and contract administration
for installation of additional landfill gas
migration probes at each facility.

Landfill Facilities Work, Waste
Management of Virginia
Jeff is the Senior Project Manager
for projects in support of four of the
company’s landfill facilities in Virginia.

Work includes disposal capacity
evaluation and capital planning, permit
modifications, landfill cell and closure
design, landfill gas collection design and
construction administration. Recent
projects include permit modification for
a synthetic turf cover system, design
and construction administration for 30
acres of expansion, and closure design
of 15 to 20 acre areas at three of the
landfill facilities.

Various Landfill Services, Republic
Services, TN, GA, LA, AL
Senior Project Manager. Jeff has
managed projects in support of two
of the company’s regional landfill
facilities. Work includes leachate
collection system investigation and
design of improvements, preparation
of construction documents for new
phases of construction and closure,
storm water improvements, and contract
administration assistance.

EDUCATION
MS, Civil Engineering,
University of New
Hampshire
BS, Mechanical
Engineering, University of
New Hampshire

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer, LA,
No. 44611
Professional Engineer,
NC, No. 040654
Professional Engineer,
VA, No. 048265
American Academy of
Environmental Engineers,
NC

INDUSTRY TENURE
25 Years
With more than 25 years of diverse industry experience, Jeff is focused on providing landfill services to both public and private clients. He leads our teams in providing innovative solutions and establishing best practices, and provides technical oversight on key projects. His areas of expertise include planning, design, permitting and construction administration of municipal solid waste and industrial landfill expansions, landfill closures, post closure landfill re-use, and recycling and transfer station facilities. Jeff has been an active member of the SWANA for over 20 years, leading to his election as SWANA International President for FY 2018. He shares his experience by authoring articles for industry publications, presenting at major waste conferences, developing national technical policies and assisting with development of SWANA’s manager of landfill operations course and exam.

Jeff Murray
Engineering Manager
#16..
- 1201 -
34 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities top load truck loadout, the development
of a new access road to the existing rail
spur line, conversion of the rail spur to
a truck haul roadway, and necessary
modifications at the Smith Gap Landfill
for the truck arrangement, including
trailer storage areas. Other work has
included assistance with review of LFG to
RNG proposals and contract negotiations.

Waste Management, Inc., Maplewood
Landfill, Amelia County, VA
Jeff is the Senior Project Manager for
ongoing support for the Maplewood
Landfill located in Amelia County,
Virginia. The landfill receives up to 7,000
tons of waste per day via truck and rail
haul. Work includes annual disposal
capacity evaluation, development of five
year fill plans, life of site capital planning,
solid waste permit modifications, landfill
cell expansion and closure design, landfill
gas collection design and construction
administration. Recent projects include
permit modification for a synthetic
turf final cover system, design and
construction administration for 60-acres
of landfill expansion, and the closure of a
40-acre area.

Roanoke Valley Resource Authority
(RVRA),Smith Gap Regional Landfill,
Tinker Creek &Salem Transfer Stations,
Roanoke, VA
Sr. Project Manager. HDR was selected
by RVRA to assist them with the
conversion of their transfer and haul
operations from rail to truck haul. This
project effort includes the conversion and
expansion of an existing transfer station
from compactor loadout to top load by
adding two drive through tunnels, a new
scalehouse and traffic arrangement and
the development of a citizen drop-of area.

Also included is the conversion of another
transfer station from top load tail hail to

JEFF MURRAY(CONTINUED)
Chester County, Disaster Debris
Management Plan, West Chester, PA
Jeff was the Client and Senior Project
Manager for work related to the
preparation of solid waste consulting
services for the County’s Disaster Debris
Management Plan. Work included
preparing their first formalized plan and
coordinating efforts of the HDR Project
Team for training and tabletop exercises
for County staff and members of the
seventy three (73) municipalities in
the County.

City of Raleigh, Waste Reduction Task
Force Facilitation, Raleigh, NC
Jeff was the Project Manager for the
professional facilitation of the Waste
Reduction Task Force (WRTF). Work
included coordination with City staff to
develop the task force meeting agendas,
conducting research as needed to
provide the task force members with
an understanding of different waste
reduction strategies, leading the group
discussions so that each task force
member was afforded an opportunity
to provide input, and preparing the final
report for presentation to City Council.

Through a series of four meetings,
the WRTF was able to establish a
recommended residential and city wide
diversion goal of 50% by 2020, identified
several strategies to be implemented
in order to achieve the goal, and
recommended changes to the City’s
comprehensive plan.
#16..
- 1202 -
35 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Southeastern Public Service Authority,
Ongoing Solid Waste Services, VA
Client/Senior Project Manager. HDR
provides ongoing support of the
authority’s landfill and transfer station
operations. Work includes landfill
master planning, permitting, postclosure inspections and monitoring, operational assistance, landfill gas
engineering, facility evaluations and
compliance monitoring. Jeff has also
assisted with technology review and
contracting negotiations with an
alternative waste processing facility,
host community agreement negotiations
and conditional use permit and rezoning
applications for the expansion of the
landfill. Current projects include strategic
communications and engineering to
support the solid waste and wetlands
permitting for over 100 acres of landfill
expansion of its Regional Landfill in
Suffolk Virginia.

Iowa City, Climate Action and Adoption
Plan (CAAP) Methane Feasibility Study,
Iowa City, IA
The City of Iowa City (City) has been a
leader in environmental stewardship and
sustainability for decades - with a driving
desire to take action on climate change.

Through the adoption of the Climate
Action and Adoption Plan (CAAP), the
City is responding on two priority items
identified in the CAAP including: Action
Number 3.7 – Take Action on a Study
to Efficiently Capture and Use Methane
from Wastewater Operations and
Action Number 3.8 – Take Action on a
Feasibility Study on energy Generation
from Landfill Methane. HDR was selected
to partner with the City to complete
a Methane Feasibility Study for the
Landfill and Wastewater Treatment Plant
including an Economic Analysis.

City of San Diego, Miramar Landfill Gas
to Energy Study, San Diego, CA
The City of San Diego operates the
Miramar Landfill site and currently
has ongoing agreements with a LFGTE
Developer to operate and maintain the
GCCS systems at Miramar, and two
LFGTE facilities. HDR was engaged to
identify the “highest and best” use of the
LFG generated at Miramar; and achieve
and maintain environmental compliance
at Miramar. Pursuant to these goals,
the City commissioned HDR to develop
a feasibility study to characterize and
analyze alternate feasible uses for LFG
collected at Miramar to determine the
most economical and practical LFGTE
option(s) for LFG beneficial use. The
feasibility study was organized to follow
the process of LFG generation, collection
and beneficial use analysis, including:

Landfill Gas Generation Modeling;

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering,
University of Texas,
Austin

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer,
Civil, FL, No. 66477
Professional Engineer,
Environmental, TX, No.
103847

INDUSTRY TENURE
23 Years
Joel has more than 22 years of engineering experience, and currently leads HDR’s landfill gas practice. He has managed and provided technical expertise to a variety of landfill gas, solid waste and alternative energy projects in the United States, Canada, and Australia.

Expertise includes landfill gas collection and control system design, landfill gas construction oversight, landfill gas monitoring and reporting, solid waste cell design, and solid waste cell closure. He is also well-versed in air and waste facility permitting, including Title V, NSPS/EG, NESHAP, GHG Reporting and other regulatory requirements. Joel has also worked on numerous projects from the perspective of a landfill gas to energy developer. Joel’s experience outside of the solid waste industry includes water, wastewater, and stormwater design and regulation, as well as groundwater monitoring and compliance; including five years of public sector employment with the State of Texas.

Joel Miller
Landfill Gas
#16..
- 1203 -
36 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

JOEL MILLER (CONTINUED)
Waste Authority, IA
• Hanes Mill Road Landfill, WinstonSalem, NC
Yakima County, Landfill Gas to Energy
Feasibility and Migration Compliance,
Yakima, WA
Joel led engineering activities for the
study of the subsurface migration of
landfill gas and the recommendation
of mitigation strategies. Additional
compliance work included the completion
of New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) design capacity report, as
well as Tier 1 and Tier 2 sampling and
reporting according to the regulations
and published methods. This reporting
included field work and management
of drilling and laboratory personnel.

This study included detailed landfill
gas modeling, construction cost
estimating, and research into new
technologies, as well as the development
of detailed financial pro forma for each
project option, and concluded with
recommendations for future action.
into technical support for review of
qualifications and into the RFP and
procurement stages
Various Public and Private Clients,
LFG Collection and Control System
(GCCS) Design, Bidding Assistance and
Construction Quality Assurance (CQA)
Joel provided GCCS design and/or CQA
for landfill gas system construction at the
following sites:
• Amarillo Landfill, Amarillo, TX
• Rock Prairie Road Landfill, College
Station, TX
• Tessman Road Landfill, San Antonio,
TX
• McCombs Landfill, El Paso, TX
• Ponce Landfill, Puerto Rico
• Hickory Ridge Landfill, DeKalb County,
GA
• Timberlands Landfill, Brewton, AL
• Davis County Landfill, Davis County,
UT
• Central County Solid Waste Disposal
Center, Sarasota County, FL
• Tomoka Farms Road Landfill, Volusia
County, FL
• East Central Solid Waste Commission
Landfill, Mora, MN
• York Area Solid Waste Agency
Landfill, York, NE
• Bluff Road Landfill, Lincoln, NE
• Rowan County Landfill, Woodleaf, NC
• Cedar Rapids / Linn County Solid
Physical/Technical Requirements
for Transition of LFG Rights; Funding
Programs/Incentives/Markets/
Regulations; Technology Options for
Landfill Gas Utilization; and Economic
Comparison of LFGTE technologies.

City of San Diego, North City Renewable
Energy Project – Miramar Landfill Gas
and Power Generation Facilities and
Services, San Diego, CA
Having completed the Miramar LFGTE
Study, which analyzed the feasibility
of various LFGTE technologies and
outlined the LFG collection and control
performance criteria that could enhance
LFG collection at the landfill and
support an LFGTE project. The City
of San Diego subsequently requested
Joel’s assistance in providing technical
information and support regarding the
LFG and LFGTE technical sections that
are included in a Request for Statement
of Qualifications (RFSQ) and a future
Request for Proposals (RFP) to identify a
developer/entity able to Design/Build/
Finance/Operate/Maintain (DBFOM)
a project for Landfill Gas Cogeneration
Facilities and possible Biosolids
Management Facilities. Joel worked
to develop the technical structure and
wording of the technical inserts to the
RFQ to allow the respondents flexibility
in how they present their qualifications
for the project. This work will continue
#16..
- 1204 -
37 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
San Jose Water Company, Montevina
Water Treatment Plant Improvements
Progressive Design-Build, San Jose, CA
Rich was the design manager for
$50million in improvements to convert
the 30 mgd plant from direct filtration
to polymeric membrane filtration.

Improvements included structural
rehabilitation of existing structures,
flocculation and sedimentation
pretreatment facilities, disinfection,
mechanical clarifier thickening, screw
press dewatering, and future fluoridation
facilities. Elements to success included
innovative treatment process ideas,
such as an energy efficient pump flash
mix and hydraulic flocculation systems,
conversion of the existing filters to pretreatment basins, cost effective solids handing upgrades, and nanofiltration
of membrane clean-in-place waste to
minimize waste export from the site.

Incorporated several innovative ideas
into the project, such as conversion
of the existing filters to plate settling
basins, utilizing an existing clearwell for
temporary off-spec basin storage during
construction, and incorporation of a new
administrative building into the project.

Recycled Water Facilities Planning
Study, City of San Luis Obispo, San Luis
Obispo, CA
Rich performed a water quality analysis
and prepared cost estimates during
development of a facilities plan for the
City’s water resources and recovery
facility that would upgrade the plant
to achieve nutrient and THM removal,
improve reliability, accommodate growth,
and facilitate a near-term IPR project and
future DPR expansion. Capital and O&M
costs were prepared. He developed a
testing program for the plant filters to
produce tertiary quality water.

San Benito County Water District, West
Hills Water Treatment Plant Expansion,
Hollister, CA
Rich provided QA/QC and design
support for preparation of predesign
report for 4.5 MGD surface water
treatment plant. Process facilities include
a pre-oxidation for iron and manganese
removal, highrate pretreatment with
enhanced organics removal, Actiflo Carb
gravity filters, chemical feed and storage/
powdered activated carbon (PAC)
addition, treated water storage, treated
water transmission line, and solids
handling and treatment (drying lagoons).

Rich assisted with protocol development
and pilot testing of the Actiflo- Carb
process. Water quality testing was
performed to demonstrate the ability to
consistently treat water supplied from
San Justo Reservoir.

Purified Water Program Management
Services, Santa Clara Valley Water
District,San Jose, CA
Rich provided project review and
assisted in preparing cost estimates for
this important potable reuse program,
the largest such program in Northern
California, which focused on developing
and program to implement up to 45,000
AFY of potable reuse within 5 years.

Rich has more than 44 years of water and wastewater engineering experience, which includes master planning, design, and construction of treatment plants, pumping stations, pipelines, storage tanks, wells, biosolids handling, and reverse osmosis and brine management. He is considered one of HDR’s top water and advanced wastewater treatment plant engineers, and typically involved with HDR’s largest and most complex nationwide. He has served as project manager, quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) reviewer, technical advisor, or project engineer on more than 90 water treatment plant projects.

EDUCATION
MS, Environmental
Engineering, Univeristy of
Illinois, Urbana
BS, Civil Engineering,
University of Illinois,
Urbana

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer,
Civil, CA, No. 37261
Professional Engineer,
Civil, OR, No. 87175PE
Professional Engineer,
Civil, NV, No. 012435

INDUSTRY TENURE
44 Years
Richard Stratton
Groundwater Treatment
#16..
- 1205 -
38 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RICHARD STRATTON (CONTINUED)
Begonia Iron Removal Plant
Caustic System Upgrades and
Miscellaneous Infrastructure
Rich was the project manager for
preparation of a BODR for the caustic
system and miscellaneous infrastructure
upgrades at Begonia Iron Removal Plant.

Begonia Iron Removal
Plant Improvements
Rich provided QA/QC for predesign and
design of residual handling improvements
to eliminate the use of the unlined drying
beds at the 18 mgd plant. Improvements
included two residuals pumping stations
with ancillary power and controls, and
yard piping upgrades.

Walnut Grove and Isleton Arsenic
Treatment Systems
Rich was th project manager for piloting
effort reviews, conceptual design,
predesign, permitting assistance, final
design, bidding, and construction
engineering services for new arsenic
treatment facilities at the Walnut Grove
and Isleton WTP sites.
site, the Government Ranch (Foster
Wheeler) tank area, the spoils area, and
acquiring adjacent land. Issues that were
considered included providing adjacent
space to address treatment of backwash
solids if the use of Mallard Reservoir
is discontinued, identifying labor
hours to operate and other costs when
evaluating options, and identifying odor
control requirements. The mechanical
dewatering alternatives included options
of using screw press, belt press, and
centrifuge. Identified the criteria and
weighting for the evaluation, determined
the ranking of alternatives, and made
recommendations for mechanical
dewatering demonstration testing.

On-Call Engineering Services, California
American Water, CA
Under this contract, Rich provided
services on the following projects:

Begonia Iron Removal Plant
UV Upgrades
Rich was project manager for preparation
of a basis of design report (BODR) for
UV system upgrades at the Begonia Iron
Removal Plant. A new UV disinfection
system at Begonia Iron Removal
Plant was needed to address needs
related to future well replacement, and
defer the need to replace uncovered
sludge lagoons.

Rinconada Water Treatment Plant
Construction Management, Santa Clara
Valley Water District, Los Gatos, CA
Conducted a value engineering study
and constructability review of the 30%
design submittal. Reviewed, evaluated,
and verified the constructability of the
proposed reliability improvements
to the 80 mgd Rinconada WTP, and
recommended enhancements to reduce
risks during construction of the $135
million retrofit of the Rinconada WTP,
which increased its capacity to 100 mgd.

This project involved replacement and
upgrade of all major plant components.

New facilities include raw water
ozonation flocculation and plate settler
clarification and dual media filtration.

Work also helped the District meet
increasingly stringent standards for water
quality seismic stability and safety.

Bollman Water Treatment Plant Solids
Handling Evaluation, Contra Costa
Water District, Concord, CA
Rich was the project manager for
evaluation of on-site solids dewatering
alternatives for the 75 mgd Bollman
Water Treatment Plant, which included
a land application and mechanical
dewatering alternatives. The land
application alternative included options
of using a portion of the Mallard
Reservoir to create basins, the Chenery
#16..
- 1206 -
39 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
The County of Orange (OC Waste &
Recycling), Orange County Landfills -
Prima Deshecha Sanitary Landfill, San
Juan Capistrano, CA
Weekly OMM of the Groundwater
Extraction System (GES) and all liquid
conveyance systems on site, such as
reclaimed water system, potable water
system, leachate collection/storage
system, and landfill gas condensate
collection/storage system. The GES
was comprised of four (4) groundwater
extraction wells, an air compressor
station, a 4,000-gallon groundwater
storage tank and a truck loading station.

Provided weekly inspections, routine
preventive maintenance, repair work
(routine and non-routine) provided on an
as-needed basis, monthly reporting, and
emergency response (when necessary).

Performed quarterly groundwater
monitoring and sampling of 21 monitoring
wells, and 15 piezometers.

The County of Orange (OC Waste &
Recycling), Orange County Landfills -
Coyote Canyon Landfill, Newport Beach,
CA
Maintenance of the groundwater
systems, regular monthly inspections,
meter calibration, keeping all areas clean
(including extraction wells, detention
vault, sewer riser and storage tank
area) including removal of debris and
weeds, repair of the sewer line, on an
as needed basis. Performed quarterly
groundwater monitoring and sampling of
20 monitoring wells, and 24 piezometers.

The County of Orange (OC Waste &
Recycling), Orange County Landfills -
Forster Canyon , San Juan Capistrano,
CA
Performed quarterly groundwater
monitoring and sampling of 4, 6, and 6
monitoring wells, respectively.

The County of Orange (OC Waste &
Recycling), Orange County Landfills
- Lane Road and San Joaquin Landfill
Sites, Irvine, CA
Performed quarterly groundwater
monitoring and sampling of 4, 6, and 6
monitoring wells, respectively.

EDUCATION
BS, Soil Sciences,
California Polytechnic
State University, San Luis
Obispo

CERTIFICATIONS
OSHA Annual 8-hour
Hazardous Waste
Operations Refresher
Training, 2020

INDUSTRY TENURE
28 Years
Sal Sanchez has 28 years of experience in the construction and environmental industries, with significant expertise in installation, operation and maintenance, monitoring, and troubleshooting of remediation systems. Additionally, Sal has performed feasibility tests, managed the implementation of various remediation and landfill projects, operated heavy equipment, provided health and safety and contractor oversight during remedial system installation, performed activities associated with groundwater, soil vapor, soil, and ambient air sampling, and is proficient in pipe fitting (i.e., PVC solvent welding, HDPE fusion welding, and steel pipe threading). Sal has significant experience with the following remedial technologies: Soil Vapor Extraction, High-Vacuum Dual-Phase Extraction, Ex-Situ Bioremediation, Groundwater Treatment, LNAPL Product Recovery, Air Strippers, Thermal and Catalytic Oxidizers, Advance Oxidation, and Landfill Gas Collection Systems.

Salvador Sanchez | JHA Environmental, Inc.

Field Services
#16..
- 1207 -
40 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
County of San Bernardino Solid Waste
Management Division, LFGCCS OM&M
Tetra Tech performed LFGCCS OM&M
of the San Bernardino County landfills
starting in 1992. Tetra Tech provided full
OM&M services at SWMD landfills over
multiple contract terms. In 2016, the
County of San Bernardino awarded Tetra
Tech a 3-year contract to provide OM&M
at the Milliken, Colton, Heaps Peak, San
Timoteo, and Barstow landfills. Currently,
Tetra Tech provides non-routine LFG
OM&M services at the County’s active
and closed landfills.

OC Waste & Recycling (OCWR),
OCWR South Region Landfills LFGCCS
OM&M Services
Tetra Tech has been providing LFG
control system OM&M services for
landfills in the OCWR’s South Region for
15 years. OCWR’s South Region includes
landfills in Irvine, San Juan Capistrano,
and Newport Beach. Routine activities
include OM&M of flare stations, blowers,
generators, air injection systems, air
compressors, wellfield, and condensate
management systems. Additional
responsibilities include: response to
emergency and non-emergency callouts
by OCWR staff, construction of upgrades
and repairs to LFG control systems,
SCAQMD Rule 1150.1 monitoring,
perimeter probe sampling, indoor
monitoring of the flare station control
building, and positive pressure leak
testing. Additional tasks covered by the
contract include the following:
• Construction of vertical and horizontal
LFG collectors
• Extension of existing vertical and
horizontal LFG collectors
• Extraction well service removal
and re-installation
• Header removal and re-installation
• Repair or modifications to the LFG
Collection System
• Annual Flare and GAC Source Testing
Tetra Tech has performed more than 100
task orders for nonroutine services on or
under budget at the site.

County of Fresno, American Avenue
Landfill - LFGCCS OM&M Services
Tetra Tech was selected in mid-2016 to
provide OM&M of the LFGCCS at the
American Avenue Landfill. The existing
LFGCCS includes 9 vertical gas extraction
wells installed in the inactive Phase I, 75
vertical gas extraction wells installed in
Phase II, 42 vertical gas extraction wells
and 15 horizontal collectors installed in
Phase III.

Tetra Tech is performing all actions
necessary to comply with the
requirements of the New Source
Performance Standards/Emissions
Guidelines (NSPS/EG), state, local
regulations and permits for the site,
as well as the site specific Startup,
Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan
the Title V permit, and Air Emission
Related Submittals. This includes the
performance of the following activities:
• Routine LFGCCS OM&M, and
reporting;
• Landfill gas surface emissions testing
Sami is professional civil engineer with 16 years of experience in the design, construction and operation of landfill gas collection and control systems. He is a specialist in the preparation and processing of regulatory reports documenting landfill gas system operation and maintenance programs. He has closely coordinated between engineering and field monitoring staff on multiple-site OM&M programs, and has performed data analysis and interpretation to assist in optimizing overall Landfill Gas Collection System performance. Sami has been responsible for the preparation of work orders, and in processing of invoices for repairs and upgrades to landfill gas extraction wells, conveyance piping, and treatment facilities. He has also been directly involved in the development of permitting plans and has been directing landfill gas reporting programs which comply with the requirements of local Air Pollution Control Districts, and California Air Resources Control Board, and United States Environmental Protection Agency.

EDUCATION
BS, Chemical Engineering,
California State
Polytechnic University,
Pamona

REGISTRATIONS
California Registered
Professional Engineer
in Civil Engineering, No.
84806
Texas Registered
Professional Engineer
in Civil Engineering, No.
19535

INDUSTRY TENURE
16 Years
Sami Ayass | Tetra Tech
Landfill Gas Engineering, Operations & Maintenance
#16..
- 1208 -
41 County of San Luis Obispo | RFP PS- #1665
Engineering Services for the Los Osos Landfill Post Closure Activities

SAMI AYASS (CONTINUED)
San Bernardino County Landfill
Facilities, Landfill Gas System
Operations and Maintenance
Provided reporting, work order
processing, accounting, and monitoring
for landfill gas system operation,
maintenance and monitoring contract for
nine (9) sanitary landfills. This included
preparation and processing of monthly
reports, preparation of invoices, methane
gas analysis, participation in ongoing
project meetings, and preparation and
distribution of meeting notes. Also
responsible for preparing reports
documenting SCAQMD Rule 1150.1 and
431.1 monitoring efforts, and for the
procurement of equipment needed for
landfill gas system modifications.

OC Waste & Recycling South Region
Landfill Operations, Landfill Gas System
Operations and Maintenance
Providing engineering, reporting, work
order processing, and accounting
services for landfill gas system
operation, maintenance, and monitoring
contract. Monthly reports are prepared
documenting routine and non-routine
/ emergency response actions taken
at the Prima Deshecha, Lane Road and
San Joaquin landfills. Reports present
data obtained during monitoring of
flare stations, probes, condensate
sumps, gas wells, and document
equipment calibration.
and reporting;
• Annual landfill flare source testing;
• Preparation of Semi-Annual Report
of Required Monitoring, SemiAnnual NSPS Reporting, and Annual Compliance Certification; and,
• General liaison and negotiation
with the San Joaquin Air Pollution
Control District.

OC Waste & Recycling Central Region
Landfill Operations, Landfill Gas System
Operations and Maintenance
Providing engineering, reporting, work
order processing, and accounting
services in support of landfill gas system
operation, maintenance and monitoring
contract at the Frank R. Bowerman,
Santiago Canyon, and Gothard Street
landfills. This includes preparation and
processing of reports documenting
OM&M of landfill gas flare stations,
gas extraction system, gas condensate
management systems, and landfill gas
monitoring probes. Data documenting
SCAQMD Rule 1150.1 and 431.1
monitoring activities is also provided.
#16..
- 1209 -
HDR Engineering Exceptions to SLO Landfill Closure PSA 3-31-2022 – APPENDIX B SAMPLE CONTRACT

CONTRACT INTRO