Modesto City Council
January 13, 2026

Attachment F – PROTEST INFORMATION
Attachment F

PROTEST INFORMATION
This attachment is intended to provide Offerors with an overview of the Lead State’s protest law, procedures, and requirements, which may be updated and amended without notice. Offerors filing a protest are wholly responsible for locating, understanding, and complying with protest law, procedures, and requirements in effect at the time of the protest.

This RFP and Offeror’s participation therein is subject to the following Protest Information.

I. Protest Information
A. In accordance with Article 109 of the Colorado Procurement Code, any aggrieved party in connection with the RFP or Award of a Master Agreement may protest by sending an email to the following: John Chapman at [email protected]. The protest shall be submitted within ten (10) Business Days after such aggrieved party knows or should have known of the facts giving rise to the protest.

B. C.R.S. Title 24, Article 109, Section 505, Costs, in part, states that when a protest is sustained and the aggrieved party should have been, but was not awarded the contract under the Solicitation, the aggrieved party shall be entitled to the reasonable costs incurred in connection with the Solicitation, including bid preparation costs. Reasonable costs shall not include attorney fees. No other costs shall be permitted.
#16..
- 631 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment G – OFFEROR INFORMATION, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, AND CERTIFICATIONS Attachment G

OFFEROR INFORMATION, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, AND CERTIFICATIONS Offeror must provide complete responses to each item below. Insert your responses into this worksheet directly below each question or prompt.

I. OFFEROR INFORMATION
A. Company’s Full Legal Name:

B. Primary Business Address:

C. Federal Tax Identification Number:

D. Entity Type:
☐ Sole Proprietorship
☐ Partnership
☐ Limited Liability Company
☐ Corporation
E. Artificial Intelligence Disclosure. Was artificial intelligence technology used in the development or completion of any portion of this proposal? (Check one of the below.) ☐ Yes
☐ No
II. BUSINESS DETAILS
A. Company Website. Provide a URL for your company’s website.

B. Company History. Provide a brief history of your company, including the year of its founding and any material acquisitions or mergers in which it has been involved.

C. Company Size. Identify the number of employees working for your company. #16..
- 632 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment G – OFFEROR INFORMATION, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, AND CERTIFICATIONS D. Ownership Structure. Describe your company’s ownership structure.

E. Litigation. List all claims of non-performance or breach from customers in excess of $5,000, including all pending litigation matters (including civil, criminal, or appellate) or criminal convictions in the past 5 years for the company and all principals. Attach an additional document if necessary.

III. PROPOSAL CONTACT
The Proposal Contact must be able to respond timely to communications from the Lead State. Offeror must, within 24 hours, notify the Lead State of any change to Offeror’s Proposal Contact.

A. Proposal Contact Name:

B. Proposal Contact Title:

C. Proposal Contact Email:

D. Proposal Contact Phone Number:

IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS
By signing below and submitting a response to this RFP, Offeror acknowledges and certifies the following:

A. Debarment. (Check one of the below.)
☐ Neither Offeror nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in public procurement or contracting by any governmental department or agency. ☐ Offeror cannot certify the statement above, and Offeror will affix a written explanation to this attachment for review by the Lead State. If after reviewing Offeror’s written explanation the Lead State determines it is not in the best interest of the Lead State, Participating Entities, or Purchasing Entities to award Offeror a Master Agreement, the Lead State may reject Offeror’s proposal.
#16..
- 633 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment G – OFFEROR INFORMATION, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, AND CERTIFICATIONS B. Non-collusion.

1. This proposal has been developed independently by Offeror and has been submitted without collusion and without any agreement, understanding, or planned common course of action with any other Offeror or supplier of Deliverables in a manner designed to limit fair and open competition.

2. The contents of this proposal have not been communicated by Offeror or its employees or agents to any person not an employee or agent of Offeror and will not be communicated to any such persons prior to the RFP Close Date.

C. Data Disclosure to Foreign Governments and Prohibited Technology. (Check one of the below.)
☐ Offeror is not an entity subject to laws, rules, or policies potentially requiring disclosure of, or provision of access to, customer data to foreign governments or entities controlled by foreign governments, and Offeror’s offerings do not contain, include, or utilize components or services supplied by any entity subject to the same. Offeror’s offerings also do not contain, include, or utilize covered technology prohibited under Section 889 of the National Defense Authorization Act, as amended.
☐ Offeror cannot certify all statements above, and Offeror will affix a written explanation to this attachment for review by the Lead State. If after reviewing Offeror’s written explanation the Lead State determines it is not in the best interest of the Lead State, Participating Entities, or Purchasing Entities to award Offeror a Master Agreement, the Lead State may reject Offeror’s proposal.

D. Conflicts of Interest. (Check one of the below.)
☐ Offeror represents that none of its officers or employees are officers or employees of the Lead State and that none of its officers or employees have a conflict of interest as defined by the laws, rules, or policies of the Lead State.
☐ Offeror cannot certify the statement above, and Offeror will affix a written explanation to this attachment for review by the Lead State. If after reviewing Offeror’s written explanation the Lead State determines it is not in the best interest of the Lead State, Participating Entities, or Purchasing Entities to award Offeror a Master Agreement, the Lead State may reject Offeror’s proposal.

E. Reserved.

F. Required Insurance. Offeror agrees to acquire insurance from an insurance carrier or carriers licensed to conduct business in each Participating Entity’s state at the levels prescribed in Attachment D – Sample Master Agreement. Offeror understands that this requirement is mandatory and will not be negotiated by the Lead State.

G. NASPO ValuePoint Administrative Fee. Offeror agrees to pay a 0.25% administrative fee and submit summary and detailed sales reports to NASPO ValuePoint in accordance with D – Sample Master Agreement. All costs proposed by Offeror must be inclusive of the NASPO ValuePoint administrative fee. Offeror understands that the requirements in this section are mandatory and will not be negotiated by the Lead State.

H. Marketing Plan. If awarded a Master Agreement resulting from this RFP, within 30 days of execution of the Master Agreement, Offeror will meet with NASPO ValuePoint marketing #16..
- 634 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment G – OFFEROR INFORMATION, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, AND CERTIFICATIONS personnel to review and track progress on the marketing plan described by Offeror in Attachment H – Offeror Response Worksheet.

I. Confidential, Proprietary, or Protected Information. As set forth in Attachment A – RFP Terms and Conditions, if Offeror is claiming any portion of its proposal as confidential, proprietary, or protected, Offeror must complete the required sections of Attachment K – Claim of Business Confidentiality, and submit with Offeror’s proposal a redacted copy of Offeror’s proposal, which must be clearly marked as such. Offeror may not mark pricing or Offeror’s entire proposal as confidential, proprietary, or protected. Submission of a Claim of Business Confidentiality does not guarantee that information claimed by Offeror as confidential, proprietary, or protected will not be subject to disclosure in accordance with applicable public information laws, rules, and policies. If Offeror fails to submit a redacted copy of Offeror’s proposal, or fails to claim information as confidential, proprietary, or protected in compliance with this RFP, Offeror releases the Lead State, NASPO, NASPO members, and entities represented on the Multistate Sourcing Team from any obligation to keep the information confidential and waives all claims of liability arising from disclosure of the information.

J. Conditional Awards. Offeror understands that awards and execution of a Master Agreement are conditional as set forth in Attachment A – RFP Terms and Conditions, and Offeror agrees to hold the Lead State and NASPO harmless and release the Lead State and NASPO from any liability for damages arising from non-award or non-execution of a contract.

K. Understanding of the RFP. Offeror has read the RFP in its entirety and understands and agrees to comply with all requirements set forth therein. Any conflicts in the materials composing the RFP and any issues relating to the content of the RFP, including instructions, requirements, or specifications Offeror believes to be ambiguous, unduly restrictive, erroneous, anticompetitive, or unlawful, have been brought to the attention of the Lead State using the process described in the RFP for asking questions or, if applicable, by filing a protest. In accordance with Attachment A – RFP Terms and Conditions, Offeror acknowledges and understands that any protest, claim, dispute, or action based upon a conflict or issue described herein must be filed no later than the RFP Close Date, and Offeror waives the right to file any protest, claim, dispute, or action based upon a conflict or issue described herein if not filed by the RFP Close Date. #16..
- 635 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment G – OFFEROR INFORMATION, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, AND CERTIFICATIONS Signature
The undersigned is one of the following:

1. The Offeror, if Offeror is an individual;

2. A partner in the company, if Offeror is a partnership; or

3. An officer or employee of the responding corporation having authority to sign on its behalf, if Offeror is a corporation.

By signing below, the undersigned warrants that the representations made and the information provided in Offeror’s proposal are true, correct, and reliable for purposes of evaluation for a potential contract award. The submission of inaccurate or misleading information may be grounds for disqualification from contract award and may subject the undersigned, Offeror, or both to suspension or debarment proceedings, as well as other remedies available to the Lead State by law, including termination of any Master Agreement awarded to Offeror.

OFFEROR:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Signature Date
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Printed Name Title
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Email Address Phone Number
#16..
- 636 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment H – OFFEROR RESPONSE WORKSHEET
Attachment H

OFFEROR RESPONSE WORKSHEET
Offeror must provide complete and succinct responses to each item below. Insert your responses into this worksheet in the box directly below each question or prompt. While supplementary marketing materials are neither requested nor desired, Offeror should provide all information necessary to demonstrate Offeror’s ability to meet the requirements of this RFP and the RFP’s Scope of Work.

I. RESPONSE TO MANDATORY MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
A. Standards Compliance – For items in the process of being added to the NIJ Certified Products List (NIJ CPL) or the ASTM Verified Products List, describe the items Offeror has submitted and provide the date each item was submitted to NIJ or ASTM.

II. RESPONSE TO TECHNICAL CRITERIA
A. Experience, skills & qualifications

1. Describe your Company/Offeror history selling Body Armor & Ballistic Resistant Products.

2. Describe your company’s past experience with contracts performing the same or similar Scope of Work or providing the same or similar Deliverables in federal, state, and local governments.

3. Describe your company’s information on training of authorized distributors/resellers/employees for contract sales. Include an overview of Offeror's training for resellers/authorized distributors/employees/customers on products and their standards.

B. Scope of Work

1. Describe your plan for meeting the Master Agreement Objectives identified in Attachment B – Scope of Work.
#16..
- 637 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment H – OFFEROR RESPONSE WORKSHEET

2. Provide evidence of your ability to provide the Deliverables identified in the Scope of Work.

3. Describe your ability to fulfill Contractor Responsibilities and Tasks identified in the Scope of Work.

C. Change Management of Standards

1. Provide the Offeror’s plan to phase out 0101.06 when it is no longer maintained on the NIJ CPL.

2. Provide Offeror information on new product creation/testing/ process for having product on the NIJ CPL for the 0101.07 Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor.

3. Provide Offeror information on new products for the transition of Stab Resistance of Personal Body Armor from the 0115.00 to 0115.01 that is currently in the draft phase.

4. Provide Offeror information on new product creation of Ballistic-Resistant Helmets Worn by U.S. Public Safety Officers meeting ASTM E3368/E3368M and on the ASTM Verified Products List.

5. Provide Offeror information on new product creation of Ballistic-Resistant Shields Used by Law Enforcement Officers meeting ASTM E3347/E3347M and on the ASTM Verified Products List.

6. Provide Offeror’s past, current, and future knowledge/training/activity with updating standards from draft phase through implementation.
#16..
- 638 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment H – OFFEROR RESPONSE WORKSHEET

7. Provide Offeror’s process to notify Lead State when NIJ CPL and/or ASTM verified or certified products are in a Model Status of Suspended or Inactive so that these products are removed from the current price list.

8. Provide Offeror planned process to remove products from current price list when the NIJ CPL is no longer maintained for 0101.06?

9. Provide overview of Offeror's training for resellers/authorized distributors/employees/customers as products are available with new standards.

D. Warranty, Service, etc.

1. Describe in detail your company's warranty plan. Ensure you include warranty plans and requirements for different types of items listed in Attachment I – Cost Proposal.

2. Describe in detail your company's recycling plan for used contract items and the overall environmental efforts made by your company. This can be included as a separate attachment if needed.

3. Describe your return policy.

4. What are your quality assurance measures and how are they handled in your organization?
#16..
- 639 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment H – OFFEROR RESPONSE WORKSHEET

5. Describe your customer service offerings, including availability of key personnel and help desk services.

6. Describe details around what response time Offeror will meet for any Participating Entity questions, including but not limited to, Participating Addendum completions, Participating Addendum requirements (such as volume reporting), local contact(s) for product purchases, etc.

7. Describe the details of Offeror’s process to notify Participating Entities and authorized distributors/resellers that the Master Agreement price list has been updated, the distributor list has been updated, an Amendment has been executed to extend the contract, or any other changes when they are completed on the Master Agreement.

8. Provide information on Offeror's ability to provide sizing, fit, delivery, and customer service to eligible Participating Entities. Ensure to address these customer service needs for non-continental U.S. states and territories.

9. Provide information if Offeror is unable to serve any eligible Participating Entities.

10. Describe your customer website capabilities, including but not limited to accessibility standards, etc.

11. Describe your ordering process and methods of order submission, including any online system through which Purchasing Entities can place and track Orders.

12. Describe your ability to support a decentralized system of Orders submitted from many end users in multiple states and locations.
#16..
- 640 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment H – OFFEROR RESPONSE WORKSHEET
E. Implementation and Promotion of the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement

1. Describe your company’s experience working with contracting cooperatives.

2. List the cooperatives through which you currently have a contract and provide sales volume information for each. Identify any restrictions on pricing and sales (e.g., mostfavored-nation clauses) imposed by your other cooperative contracts.

3. Describe how you intend to market your Master Agreement and encourage adoption and participation among potential Participating and Purchasing Entities, including state governments.

4. Describe features of the dedicated website you will be setting up for this Master Agreement, including, as applicable, staff contact information, and online ordering capabilities.

5. Describe the staff and other resources that will be allocated to your Master Agreement and the training you will provide to staff to ensure their familiarity with Master Agreement terms and pricing and their compliance therewith.

6. Describe your approach to negotiation of Participating Addenda. Describe the extent to which you will provide Participating Entities flexibility in incorporating entity-specific language into their Participating Addenda. (e.g., Do you require entities to provide statutory citations for their entity-specific language? Are you able to devote resources to simultaneous negotiation of multiple Participating Addenda?)

7. Describe your ability to provide products and services immediately upon execution of a Master Agreement and Participating Addenda.
#16..
- 641 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment H – OFFEROR RESPONSE WORKSHEET

8. Describe how you will ensure summary and detailed sales information is promptly, completely, and accurately reported to you by your dealers, partners, and resellers for aggregation and reporting to NASPO ValuePoint in compliance with the terms of your Master Agreement.

9. Describe details around what response time Offeror will meet for Lead State and/or NASPO ValuePoint for Master Agreement requirements – annual meetings, volume reports, amendments to Master Agreement, price list update questions, etc. #16..
- 642 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment J – PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO SAMPLE MASTER AGREEMENT Attachment J

PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO SAMPLE MASTER AGREEMENT
The Lead State may, but is not obligated to, consider proposed modifications to Attachment D – Sample Master Agreement.

Provisions of the Sample Master Agreement that are generally inapplicable to, incompatible with, or unsuitable for the subject of this RFP should be brought to the attention of the Lead State using the process described in this RFP for asking questions and will be addressed only at the sole discretion of the Lead State.

Offeror-specific modifications to the Sample Master Agreement may be proposed as part of Offeror’s proposal in this attachment but are strongly discouraged. The quantity, breadth, and nature of modifications proposed by Offeror may be considered in the Lead State’s evaluation of Offeror’s proposal and of its risks, costs, and benefits to the Lead State and potential Participating Entities and Purchasing Entities. Proposing excessive or overly restrictive modifications, or proposing modifications upon which Offeror’s proposal is conditioned, may result in Offeror’s proposal being deemed non-responsive.

Offeror’s Proposed Modifications. (Check one of the below.) ☐ Offeror has no proposed modifications to Attachment D – Sample Master Agreement. ☐ Offeror proposes the modifications set forth in the table below and will submit with Offeror’s proposal a redlined copy of Attachment D – Sample Master Agreement incorporating each proposed modification.

Offeror understands, acknowledges, and agrees to comply with the following:
• The Lead State will not consider any proposed modification that:
o Is not submitted in this attachment;
o Is not accompanied by an explanation as required in this attachment; o Is not reflected in redlined edits to the Sample Master Agreement and submitted with Offeror’s proposal;
o Merely references another document or a URL; or
o Modifies the NASPO ValuePoint administrative fee.
• Offerors may propose additional terms but must include them in this attachment and must clearly identify where any terms conflict with the Sample Master Agreement. • If Offeror is awarded a Master Agreement resulting from this RFP, a comparison of Attachment D – Sample Master Agreement and Offeror’s accepted modifications thereto may be posted on the NASPO ValuePoint website for examination by potential Participating Entities and Purchasing Entities.
• Each of the following fields must be completed for each proposed modification to the Sample Master Agreement:
o Sample Master Agreement Section Reference: The page, section, or paragraph in the Sample Master Agreement that is the subject of Offeror’s proposed modification. o Sample Master Agreement Language: The language in the Sample Master Agreement that the Offeror is proposing to modify.
o Proposed Changes and Alternate Language: The Offeror’s proposed changes to the Sample Master Agreement language including, if applicable, Offeror’s proposed alternate language.
o Justification for Proposed Change: Offeror’s justification for the proposed change. #16..
- 643 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment J – PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO SAMPLE MASTER AGREEMENT o Risk and Benefits of Acceptance: Offeror’s analysis of the risk and benefits to the Lead State, Participating Entities, or Purchasing Entities—including quantifiable costs or cost savings—if Offeror’s proposed change is accepted by the Lead State.

Sample Master
Agreement
Section
Reference
Sample Master
Agreement
Language
Proposed Changes
and Alternate
Language
Justification for
Proposed Change
Risk and Benefits
of Acceptance
[Add additional rows as needed.]
#16..
- 644 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment K – CLAIM OF BUSINESS CONFIDENTIALITY
Attachment K

CLAIM OF BUSINESS CONFIDENTIALITY
Offeror’s Claims of Business Confidentiality. (Check one of the below.) ☐ Offeror is not claiming any information within Offeror’s proposal as confidential, proprietary, or protected. (Check box and skip to Signature section below.)
☐ Offeror claims the information set forth in the table below as confidential, proprietary, or protected and will submit with Offeror’s proposal a redacted copy of Offeror’s proposal, which must be clearly marked as such. Offeror understands, acknowledges, and agrees to comply with the following:
• Each of the following fields must be completed for each claim asserted by Offeror:
o Proposal Section Reference: The page, section, or paragraph in Offeror’s proposal containing the information claimed to be confidential, proprietary, or protected. o Confidential Information: A description of the information claimed to be confidential, proprietary, or protected.
o Basis for Claim: The basis for Offeror’s claim, which in accordance with Colorado Open Records Act (CORA) (§24-72-200.1 et seq., C.R.S.) shall be all of the following:
 Must include the rationale for any request to classify portions as a trade secret  Or the rationale for confidentiality or proprietary
 Shall contain references to the authority that allows for such treatment o Explanation: Explanation of how the information claimed to be confidential, proprietary, or protected meets the above.
• Offeror may not mark pricing or Offeror’s entire proposal as confidential, proprietary, or protected.

Proposal
Section
Reference
Confidential Information Basis for Claim Explanation
[Add additional rows as needed.]
#16..
- 645 -
Request for Proposals for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Issued by the State of Colorado
Solicitation Number RFP-SPCO-AR-25-03 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment K – CLAIM OF BUSINESS CONFIDENTIALITY
Signature
By signing below, the undersigned certifies under penalty of perjury that the representations made and the information provided herein are true and correct and may be relied upon by the Lead State for purposes of determining the validity of Offeror’s claim(s). Offeror understands that submission of a Claim of Business Confidentiality does not guarantee that information claimed by Offeror as confidential, proprietary, or protected will not be subject to disclosure in accordance with applicable public information laws, rules, and policies. Offeror further agrees that if Offeror fails to submit a redacted copy of Offeror’s proposal, or fails to claim information as confidential, proprietary, or protected in compliance with this RFP, Offeror releases the Lead State, NASPO, NASPO members, and entities represented on the Multistate Sourcing Team from any obligation to keep the information confidential and waives all claims of liability arising from disclosure of the information.

OFFEROR:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Signature Date
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Printed Name Title
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Email Address Phone Number
#16..
- 646 -
Market Basket Products Listed on the NIJ CPL 0101.06 - Certified. Active on the NIJ CPL.

Contractor Name: Safariland
Product Type Manufacturer (Brand and Series) Manufacturer Catalog #
NIJ-CPL Model
Designation
Gender
(M = Male,
N = Neutral,
F = Female)
NIJ Standard(s) /
ASTM Standard
Threat
Level
Ballistic
Protection
Warranty
Period
MSRP BID Price % Discount
Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection HARDWIRE® 57 Level IIIA, A7, M Series Cocealable Carrier, Male/Neutral
1366300-M/U
1348925 BA-3A00S-HW01 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,735.00 $1,641.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection HARDWIRE® 57 Level IIIA, A7, 2 - M Series Cocealable Carrier, Male/Neutral
1366300-M/U
1348925 (2) BA-3A00S-HW01 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,950.00 $1,770.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection SX™HP Level IIIA, A7, M Series Cocealable Carrier, Male/Neutral
1365076-M/U
1348925 BA-3A00S-SXHP M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,580.00 $1,548.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection SX™HP Level IIIA, A7, 2 - M Series Cocealable Carrier, Male/Neutral
1365076-M/U
1348925 (2) BA-3A00S-SXHP M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,795.00 $1,677.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection SX™HP Level IIIA, A7, M Series Cocealable Carrier, Female Structured 1365498-F 1348925 BA-3A00S-SXHPF F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,580.00 $1,548.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection SX™HP Level IIIA, A7, 2 - M Series Cocealable Carrier, Female Structured
1365498-F
1348925 (2) BA-3A00S-SXHPF F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,795.00 $1,677.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection HARDWIRE® 51 Level II, A7, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male/Neutral
1350429-M
1348925 HW-2019-05-SB M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $2,160.00 $1,296.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection HARDWIRE® 51 Level II, A7, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male/Neutral
1350429-M
1348925 (2) HW-2019-05-SB M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $2,375.00 $1,425.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection HARDWIRE® 68 Level IIIA, A7, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male/Neutral
1350430-M
1348925 HW-2019-01-SB M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,630.00 $1,578.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection HARDWIRE® 68 Level IIIA, A7, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male/Neutral
1350430-M
1348925 (2) HW-2019-01-SB M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,845.00 $1,707.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland SX Level II, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219784-M/U
1348925 BA-2000S-SX02 M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $2,025.00 $1,215.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland SX Level II, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219784-M/U
1348925 (2) BA-2000S-SX02 M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $2,240.00 $1,344.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland SX Level II, M Series Concealable Carrier, Female
1219785-F
1348925 BA-2000S-SX02F F 0101.06 II 5 years $2,025.00 $1,215.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland SX Level II, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Female
1219785-F
1348925 (2) BA-2000S-SX02F F 0101.06 II 5 years $2,240.00 $1,344.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland SX Level IIIA, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219793-M/U
1348925 BA-3A00S-SX02 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,580.00 $1,548.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland SX Level IIIA, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219793-M/U
1348925 (2) BA-3A00S-SX02 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,795.00 $1,677.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland SX Level IIIA, M Series Concealable Carrier, Female
1219794-F
1348925 BA-3A00S-SX02F F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,580.00 $1,548.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland SX Level IIIA, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Female
1219794-F
1348925 (2) BA-3A00S-SX02F F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,795.00 $1,677.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland Xtreme Level II, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219786-M/U
1348925 BA-2000S-XT03 M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $1,950.00 $1,170.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland Xtreme Level II, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219786-M/U
1348925 (2) BA-2000S-XT03 M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $2,165.00 $1,299.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland Xtreme Level II, M Series Concealable Carrier, Female
1219787-F
1348925 BA-2000S-XT03F F 0101.06 II 5 years $1,950.00 $1,170.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland Xtreme Level II, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Female
1219787-F
1348925 (2) BA-2000S-XT03F F 0101.06 II 5 years $2,165.00 $1,299.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland Xtreme Level IIIA, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219795-M/U
1348925 BA-3A00S-XT03 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,205.00 $1,323.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland Xtreme Level IIIA, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219795-M/U
1348925 (2) BA-3A00S-XT03 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,420.00 $1,452.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland Xtreme Level IIIA, M Series Concealable Carrier, Female
1219796-F
1348925 BA-3A00S-XT03F F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,205.00 $1,323.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland Xtreme Level IIIA, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Female
1219796-F
1348925 (2) BA-3A00S-XT03F F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,420.00 $1,452.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland Matrix Level II, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1221918-M/U
1348925 BA-2000S-MR02 M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $1,555.00 $933.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland Matrix Level II, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1221918-M/U
1348925 (2) BA-2000S-MR02 M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $1,770.00 $1,062.00 40.00% #16..
- 647 -
Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland Matrix Level II, M Series Concealable Carrier, Female Structured
1221919-F
1348925 BA-2000S-MR02F F 0101.06 II 5 years $1,555.00 $933.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland Matrix Level II, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1221919-F
1348925 (2) BA-2000S-MR02F F 0101.06 II 5 years $1,770.00 $1,062.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland Matrix Level IIIA, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219686-M/U
1348925 BA-3A00S-MR02 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $1,685.00 $1,011.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland Matrix Level IIIA, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219686-M/U
1348925 (2) BA-3A00S-MR02 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $1,900.00 $1,140.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland Matrix Level IIIA, M Series Concealable Carrier, Female Structured
1221920-F
1348925 BA-3A00S-MR02F F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $1,685.00 $1,011.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland Matrix Level IIIA, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Female Structured
1221920-F
1348925 (2) BA-3A00S-MR02F F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $1,900.00 $1,140.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland BV Level II, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male/Unstructured
1364403-M/U
1348925 BA-2000S-BV03 M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $1,240.00 $744.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland BV Level II, 2-M Series Concealable Carrier, Male/Unstructured
1364403-M/U
1348925 (2) BA-2000S-BV03 M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $1,455.00 $873.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection Safariland BV Level IIIA, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1345711-M/U
1348925 BA-3A00S-BV03 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $1,345.00 $807.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection Safariland BV Level IIIA, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1345711-M/U
1348925 (2) BA-3A00S-BV03 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $1,560.00 $936.00 40.00% Stab-resistant Vest (including carrier) Spike Protection PRISM Spike 1, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219804-M
1348925 PS-1.0 M or N 0115.00 1/Spike 5 years $990.00 $594.00 40.00% Stab-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Spike Protection PRISM Spike 1, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219804-M
1348925 (2) PS-1.0 M or N 0115.00 1/Spike 5 years $1,205.00 $723.00 40.00% Stab-resistant Vest (including carrier) Spike Protection PRISM Spike 2, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219805-M
1348925 PS-2.2 M or N 0115.00 2/Spike 5 years $1,160.00 $696.00 40.00% Stab-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Spike Protection PRISM Spike 2, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219805-M
1348925 (2) PS-2.2 M or N 0115.00 2/Spike 5 years $1,375.00 $825.00 40.00% Stab-resistant Vest (including carrier) Spike Protection PRISM Spike 3, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219806-M
1348925 PS-3.0 M or N 0115.00 3/Spike 5 years $1,360.00 $816.00 40.00% Stab-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Spike Protection PRISM Spike 3, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219806-M
1348925 (2) PS-3.0 M or N 0115.00 3/Spike 5 years $1,575.00 $945.00 40.00% Stab-resistant Vest (including carrier) Spike Protection PRISM Spike 3, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1345427-M
1348925 PS-3.1 M or N 0115.00 3/Spike 5 years $1,530.00 $918.00 40.00% Stab-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Spike Protection PRISM Spike 3, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1345427-M
1348925 (2) PS-3.1 M or N 0115.00 3/Spike 5 years $1,745.00 $1,047.00 40.00% Combination Vest (including carrier) Handgun-Spike PRISM MT Level II Spike 2, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1301972-M
1348925 NS02-2020S-ME M or N 0101.06-0115.00 II-2/Spike 5 years $2,475.00 $1,485.00 40.00% Combination Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun-Spike PRISM MT Level II Spike 2, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1301972-M
1348925 (2) NS02-2020S-ME M or N 0101.06-0115.00 II-2/Spike 5 years $2,690.00 $1,614.00 40.00% Combination Vest (including carrier) Handgun-Spike PRISM MT Level IIA Spike 3, M Series Concealable Carrier
1219802-M
1348925 MS-2A30S-MT21 M or N 0101.06-0115.00 IIA-3/Spike 5 years $2,000.00 $1,200.00 40.00% Combination Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun-Spike PRISM MT Level IIA Spike 3, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier
1219802-M
1348925 (2) MS-2A30S-MT21 M or N 0101.06-0115.00 IIA-3/Spike 5 years $2,215.00 $1,329.00 40.00% Combination Vest (including carrier) Handgun-Spike PRISM MT Level IIIA Spike 3, M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219803-M
1348925 MS-3A30S-MT01 M or N 0101.06-0115.00 IIIA-3/Spike 5 years $2,315.00 $1,389.00 40.00% Combination Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun-Spike PRISM MT Level IIIA Spike 3, 2 - M Series Concealable Carrier, Male
1219803-M
1348925 (2) MS-3A30S-MT01 M or N 0101.06-0115.00 IIIA-3/Spike 5 years $2,530.00 $1,518.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ HP Level IIIA APEX Male or Unstructured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), APEX™ System Carrier
1366310-M/U
1363581 BA-3A00S-SXHP M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,815.00 $1,689.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ HP Level IIIA APEX Male or Unstructured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), 2 - APEX™ System Carrier
1366310-M/U
1363581 (2) BA-3A00S-SXHP M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $3,090.00 $1,854.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ HP Level IIIA APEX Male or Unstructured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), APEX™ System Carrier
1366332-F
1363581 BA-3A00S-SXHPF F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,815.00 $1,689.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ HP Level IIIA APEX Male or Unstructured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), 2 - APEX™ System Carrier
1366332-F
1363581 (2) BA-3A00S-SXHPF F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $3,090.00 $1,854.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ Level II APEX Male or Unstructured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), APEX™ System Carrier
1363962-M/U
1363581 BA-2000S-SX02 M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $2,250.00 $1,350.00 40.00% #16..
- 648 -
Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ Level II APEX Male or Unstructured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), 2 - APEX™ System Carrier
1363962-M/U
1363581 (2) BA-2000S-SX02 M or N 0101.06 II 5 years $2,525.00 $1,515.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ Level II APEX Structured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), APEX™ System Carrier 1363964-F
1363581 BA-2000S-SX02F F 0101.06 II 5 years $2,250.00 $1,350.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ Level II APEX Structured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels),
2 - APEX™ System Carrier
1363964-F
1363581 (2) BA-2000S-SX02F F 0101.06 II 5 years $2,525.00 $1,515.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ Level IIIA APEX Male or Unstructured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), APEX™ System Carrier
1363961-M/U
1363581 BA-3A00S-SX02 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,815.00 $1,689.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ Level IIIA APEX Male or Unstructured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), 2 - APEX™ System Carrier
1363961-M/U
1363581 (2) BA-3A00S-SX02 M or N 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $3,090.00 $1,854.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including carrier) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ Level IIIA APEX Structured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), APEX™ System Carrier 1363963-F
1363581 BA-3A00S-SX02F F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $2,815.00 $1,689.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Vest (including 2 carriers) Handgun Protection APEX™ System SX™ Level IIIA APEX Structured Female Panel Array (includes Front, Back and 2 Side Ballistic Panels), 2 - APEX™ System Carrier
1363963-F
1363581 (2) BA-3A00S-SX02F F 0101.06 IIIA 5 years $3,090.00 $1,854.00 40.00% In Conjunction With (ICW) Armor (soft
armor and ICW plate) Rifle Protection
HARDWIRE® IMPAC™ C1.4 Type III+ ICW HW-2019-01-SB 7.2 5X11.5 SAPI XSmall 1365276 IMPAC C1.4 ICW HW-2019-01-SB M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $905.00 $543.00 40.00% In Conjunction With (ICW) Armor (soft
armor and ICW plate) Rifle Protection
HARDWIRE® IMPAC™ C1.4 Type III+ ICW HW-2019-01-SB 8.75X11.75 SAPI Small 1365275 IMPAC C1.4 ICW HW-2019-01-SB M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $975.00 $585.00 40.00% In Conjunction With (ICW) Armor (soft
armor and ICW plate) Rifle Protection
HARDWIRE® IMPAC™ C1.4 Type III+ ICW HW-2019-01-SB 9.5X12.5 SAPI Medium 1365274 IMPAC C1.4 ICW HW-2019-01-SB M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,045.00 $627.00 40.00% In Conjunction With (ICW) Armor (soft
armor and ICW plate) Rifle Protection
HARDWIRE® IMPAC™ C1.4 Type III+ ICW HW-2019-01-SB 10.25X13.25 SAPI Large 1365273 IMPAC C1.4 ICW HW-2019-01-SB M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,135.00 $681.00 40.00% In Conjunction With (ICW) Armor (soft
armor and ICW plate) Rifle Protection
HARDWIRE® IMPAC™ C1.4 Type III+ ICW HW-2019-01-SB 11X14 SAPI XLarge 1365272 IMPAC C1.4 ICW HW-2019-01-SB M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,235.00 $741.00 40.00% In Conjunction With (ICW) Armor (soft
armor and ICW plate) Rifle Protection
HARDWIRE® IMPAC™ C1.4 Type III+ ICW HW-2019-01-SB 10X12 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1365340 IMPAC C1.4 ICW HW-2019-01-SB M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,045.00 $627.00 40.00% In Conjunction With (ICW) Armor (soft
armor and ICW plate) Rifle Protection
HARDWIRE® IMPAC™ C1.4 Type III+ ICW HW-2019-01-SB 8X10 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1365341 IMPAC C1.4 ICW HW-2019-01-SB M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $920.00 $552.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection DT306P Type III 8.75X11.75 Multi Curve SAPI Small 1314912 DT306P M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,395.00 $837.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection DT306P Type III 9.5X12.5 Multi Curve SAPI Medium 1314913 DT306P M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,395.00 $837.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection DT306P Type III 10.25X13.25 Multi Curve SAPI Large 1314914 DT306P M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,490.00 $894.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection DT306P Type III 11X14 Multi Curve SAPI Xlarge 1314915 DT306P M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,805.00 $1,083.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection DT306P Type III 10X12 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1314910 DT306P M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,395.00 $837.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection DT306P Type III 10X12 Multi Curve Rectangle 1345796 DT306P M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,395.00 $837.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection DT306P Type III 8X10 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1347631 DT306P M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,060.00 $636.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection DT306P Type III 8X10 Multi Curve Rectangle 1314911 DT306P M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,060.00 $636.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 9000 Type III 8.75X11.75 Multi Curve SAPI Small 1350919 HW-RF2SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,295.00 $777.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 9000 Type III 9.5x12.5 Multi Curve SAPI Medium 1350920 HW-RF2SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,405.00 $843.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 9000 Type III 10.25X13.25 Multi Curve SAPI Large 1350921 HW-RF2SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,565.00 $939.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 9000 Type III 11X14 Multi Curve SAPI Xlarge 1350922 HW-RF2SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,720.00 $1,032.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 9000 Type III 10X12 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1350923 HW-RF2SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,320.00 $792.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 9000 Type III+ 8X10 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1365511 HW-RF2SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,200.00 $720.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 8000 Type III 8.75X11.75 Multi Curve SAPI Small 1350910 HW-RF1SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,345.00 $807.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 8000 Type III 9.5X12.5 Multi Curve SAPI Medium 1350911 HW-RF1SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,490.00 $894.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 8000 Type III 10.25X13.25 Multi Curve SAPI Large 1350912 HW-RF1SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,735.00 $1,041.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 8000 Type III 11X14 Multi Curve SAPI Xlarge 1350913 HW-RF1SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,975.00 $1,185.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 8000 Type III 10X12 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1350914 HW-RF1SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,640.00 $984.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 8000 Type III 10X12 Multi Curve Rectangle 1350915 HW-RF1SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,640.00 $984.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 8000 Type III 8X10 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1350916 HW-RF1SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,225.00 $735.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 8000 Type III 8X10 Multi Curve Rectangle 1350917 HW-RF1SA-2020 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,225.00 $735.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 3000 Type III 8.75X11.75 Multi Curve SAPI Small 1302175 007-015-3000 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,110.00 $555.00 50.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 3000 Type III 9.5x12.5 Multi Curve SAPI Medium 1302176 007-015-3000 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,165.00 $582.50 50.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 3000 Type III 10.25X13.25 Multi Curve SAPI Large 1302177 007-015-3000 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,305.00 $652.50 50.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 3000 Type III 11X14 Multi Curve SAPI Xlarge 1302178 007-015-3000 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,390.00 $695.00 50.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 3000 Type III 10X12 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1193120 007-015-3000 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,115.00 $557.50 50.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 3000 Type III 10X12 Multi Curve Rectangle 1193811 007-015-3000 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $1,115.00 $557.50 50.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 3000 Type III 8X10 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1193812 007-015-3000 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $960.00 $480.00 50.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 3000 Type III 8X10 Multi Curve Rectangle 1193813 007-015-3000 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $960.00 $480.00 50.00% #16..
- 649 -
Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 2100 Type III 7.25X11.50 Multi Curve SAPI XSmall 1363037 HW-HBA-2022-01 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $560.00 $336.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 2100 Type III 8.75X11.75 Multi Curve SAPI Small 1363038 HW-HBA-2022-01 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $605.00 $363.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 2100 Type III 9.5x12.5 Multi Curve SAPI Medium 1363039 HW-HBA-2022-01 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $645.00 $387.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 2100 Type III 10.25X13.25 Multi Curve SAPI Large 1363040 HW-HBA-2022-01 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $695.00 $417.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 2100 Type III 11X14 Multi Curve SAPI Xlarge 1363041 HW-HBA-2022-01 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $750.00 $450.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hardwire® 2100 Type III 10X12 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1363042 HW-HBA-2022-01 M or N 0101.06 III 10 years $645.00 $387.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612 Type III+ 8.75X11.75 SAPI Small 1365550 3612 M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,025.00 $615.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612 Type III+ 9.5x12.5 SAPI Medium 1365551 3612 M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,090.00 $654.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612 Type III+ 10.25X13.25 SAPI Large 1365552 3612 M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,165.00 $699.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612 Type III+ 11X14 SAPI XLarge 1365553 3612 M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,285.00 $771.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612 Type III+ 10X12 Multi Curve Swimmers Cut 1365554 3612 M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,105.00 $663.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612 Type III+ 8X10 Multi Curve Swimmers Cut 1365555 3612 M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $935.00 $561.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612C Type III+ 8.75X11.75 SAPI Small 1365582 3612C M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,085.00 $651.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612C Type III+ 9.5x12.5 SAPI Medium 1365583 3612C M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,185.00 $711.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612C Type III+ 10.25X13.25 SAPI Large 1365584 3612C M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,240.00 $744.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612C Type III+ 11X14 SAPI XLarge 1365585 3612C M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,355.00 $813.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612C Type III+ 10X12 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1365586 3612C M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,145.00 $687.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3612C Type III+ 8X10 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1365587 3612C M or N 0101.06 III+ 5 years $1,000.00 $600.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3404 Type III 8.75X11.75 SAPI Small 1365557 3404-23173 M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $730.00 $438.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3404 Type III 9.5x12.5 SAPI Medium 1365558 3404-23173 M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $800.00 $480.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3404 Type III 10.25X13.25 SAPI Large 1365559 3404-23173 M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $880.00 $528.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3404 Type III 11X14 SAPI XLarge 1365560 3404-23173 M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $1,000.00 $600.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3404 Type III 10X12 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1365561 3404-23173 M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $830.00 $498.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection Hesco® 3404 Type III 8X10 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1365562 3404-23173 M or N 0101.06 III 5 years $595.00 $357.00 40.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection SN106C Type IV 10X12 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1346542 SN106C M or N 0101.06 IV 5 years $775.00 $387.50 50.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection SN106C Type IV 10x12 Multi Curve Rectangle 1346543 SN106C M or N 0101.06 IV 5 years $775.00 $387.50 50.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection SN106C Type IV 8x10 Multi Curve Shooters Cut 1350229 SN106C M or N 0101.06 IV 5 years $665.00 $332.50 50.00% Ballistic-resistant Stand-alone Plate Rifle Protection SN106C Type IV 8x10 Multi Curve Rectangle 1346544 SN106C M or N 0101.06 IV 5 years $665.00 $332.50 50.00% #16..
- 650 -

AGREEMENT TRANSMITTAL SHEET
Subject of Agreement:

Vendor Name: Division:

Contact Person: Extension:

Attorney Reviewer Name:

The attached agreement is the final agreement approved by Council on and pulled from Unity for routing via DocuSign.

The attached agreement is the final version approved through the under $100,000 Unity Workflow review and pulled from Unity for routing via DocuSign.

PINS Approval Business License
Council Agenda Report 700 Form (for Consultants)
Signed or Unsigned Resolution W-9
Council Meeting Minutes (Only if unsigned
Resolution is provided)
Docusign Envelope ID: 6C878720-8389-4B7B-BC47-87D5A00C093C Enter Council Date
Juana Lynch
Participating Addendum for Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products 75369
Safariland, LLC FIN - Admin
Juliet Vaughn
X
#16..
- 651 -

Version 2023.06.15
Participating Addendum
for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
between
City of Modesto, California
and
Safariland, LLC
This Participating Addendum is entered into by City of Modesto, California (“Participating Entity”) and the following Contractor (each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”) for the purpose of participating in NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 198469, executed by Contractor and the State of Colorado (“Lead State”) for Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products (“Master Agreement”):

Safariland, LLC (“Contractor”)
13386 International Parkway
Jacksonville, FL 32218
I. PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM CONTACTS.

Contractor’s contact for this Participating
Addendum is:

Jaime Marini
Program Manager
[email protected]
904.705.1759
Participating Entity’s contact for this Participating
Addendum is:

Holly Gonzales
Buyer
[email protected]
209-341-2908
II. TERM. This Participating Addendum is effective as of the date of the last signature below or November 11, 2025, whichever is later, and will terminate upon termination of the Master Agreement, as amended, unless the Participating Addendum is terminated sooner in accordance with the terms set forth herein.

III. PARTICIPATION AND USAGE. This Participating Addendum may be used by all departments within the City of Modesto, California. If Contractor becomes aware that an entity’s use of this Participating Addendum is not authorized, Contractor will notify NASPO ValuePoint to initiate outreach to the appropriate parties.

IV. GOVERNING LAW. The construction and effect of this Participating Addendum and any Orders placed hereunder will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, Participating Entity’s laws.

V. SCOPE. Except as otherwise stated herein, this Participating Addendum incorporates the scope, pricing, terms, and conditions of the Master Agreement and the rights and obligations set forth therein as applied to Contractor and Participating Entity and Purchasing Entities. a. Products. All products available through the Master Agreement may be offered and sold by Contractor to Purchasing Entities.
b. Services. All services available through the Master Agreement may be offered and sold by Contractor to Purchasing Entities
c. Contractor Partners. All subcontractors, dealers, distributors, resellers, and other partners identified on Contractor’s NASPO ValuePoint webpage as authorized to provide Products and Services to Participating Entity may provide Products and Services to users of this Participating Addendum.

Contractor will ensure that the participation of Contractor’s subcontractors, dealers, distributors, resellers, and other partners is in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Master Agreement and in this Participating Addendum.

Any amendment to the Master Agreement shall be deemed incorporated into this Participating Addendum unless the amendment is rejected by Participating Entity in writing to Contractor within ten (10) calendar days of the amendment’s effective date and is documented thereafter via written amendment hereto.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6C878720-8389-4B7B-BC47-87D5A00C093C #16..
- 652 -
Participating Addendum for
Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products
Between City of Modesto, California and
Safariland, LLC
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Version 2023.06.15
Any conflict between this Participating Addendum and the Master Agreement will be resolved in favor of the Participating Addendum. The terms of this Participating Addendum, including those modifying or adding to the terms of the Master Agreement, apply only to the Parties and shall have no effect on Contractor’s participating addenda with other participating entities or Contractor’s Master Agreement with the Lead State.

VI. ORDERS. Purchasing Entities may place orders under this Participating Addendum by referencing the Participating Addendum Number on an order if applicable. Each Order placed under this Participating Addendum is subject to the pricing and terms set forth herein and in the Master Agreement, including applicable discounts, reporting requirements, and payment of administrative fees to NASPO ValuePoint and Participating Entity, if applicable.

VII. PARTICIPATING ENTITY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE FEE. Deleted VIII. FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS. Orders funded with federal funds may have additional contractual requirements or certifications that must be satisfied at the time the Order is placed or upon delivery. When applicable, a Purchasing Entity will identify in the Order any alternative or additional requirements related to the use of federal funds. By accepting the Order, Contractor agrees to comply with the requirements set forth therein.

IX. ATTACHMENTS. This Participating Addendum includes the following attachments:
a. Attachment A: Participating Entity Modifications and Additions to Master Agreement Terms and Conditions
b. Attachment B: Participating Entity Product and Service Exclusions c. Attachment C: Participating Entity-specific Pricing
X. NOTICE. Any notice required herein shall be sent to the following:

For Contractor:

Jaime Marini
Program Manager
[email protected]
904.705.1759
For Participating Entity:

Holly Gonzales
Buyer
[email protected]
209-341-2908
XI. SUBMISSION OF PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM TO NASPO VALUEPOINT. Upon execution, Contractor shall promptly email a copy of this Participating Addendum and any amendments hereto to NASPO ValuePoint at [email protected]. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the Participating Addendum, as amended, may be published on the NASPO ValuePoint website.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6C878720-8389-4B7B-BC47-87D5A00C093C #16..
- 653 -
Docusign Envelope ID: 6C878720-8389-4B7B-BC47-87D5A00C093C Director of Finance
9/22/2025
DeAnna Christensen
#16..
- 654 -

Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products- Colorado

BACKGROUND
The Multistate Sourcing Team led by the State of Colorado completed the re-solicitation of the NASPO ValuePoint portfolio for Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products. The proposed Master Agreement awards will allow state and local governments across the country to source new ballistic-resistant vests, spike- and edged-blade-resistant vests, ballistic-resistant helmets, ballistic-resistant shields, and associated products that meet the following requirements as established by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and ASTM:
• NIJ Standard 0101.06, Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor • NIJ Standard 0101.07, Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor • NIJ Standard 0115.00, Stab Resistance of Personal Body Armor • NIJ Standard 0115.01, Stab Resistance of Personal Body Armor • ASTM E3347/E3347M, Ballistic Resistant Shields
• ASTM E3368/E3368M, Ballistic Resistant Helmets
• Other relevant standards for Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products The Lead State and Sourcing Team respectfully request the NASPO ValuePoint Executive Council’s approval of the awards identified in this Executive Summary.

Portfolio Term: Initial term two (2) years may be amended for three (3) additional years, a five-year total award.

Cooperative Portfolio Manager: Abbi Chittenden

SOURCING TEAM
• Colorado (Lead State)
• Florida
• Hawaii
• Idaho
• Louisiana
• Minnesota
• Montana

RFP INFORMATION
• Released: 09/26/2024
• Closed: 11/05/2024
• Posting period: 40 days
• Amendments: 1

AWARD CATEGORIES
Responder’s proposals were required to include one or more of the following categories of offerings:

Category Group 1
• Market Basket 0101.07 (category discount)
• Market Basket 0101.06 (average discount for category) Category Group 2
• ASTM Helmets & Shields (category discount)
• Non-Market Basket Helmets & Shields (average discount for category) Category Group 3
• Non-Market Basket (not including Helmets & Shields) (average discount for category)

SOLICITATION AWARD RECOMMENDATION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
#16..
- 655 -

EVALUATION CRITERIA
We received 15 supplier proposals to the RFP. Suppliers did not have to respond to all Category Groups, therefore, some responses were received with “No Bid” on certain Categories and Category Groups. The Sourcing Team evaluated proposals in multiple stages across the listed categories and criteria outlined in the RFP:

Stage 1 – Initial Responsiveness and Mandatory Minimum Requirements Proposals were reviewed by the Lead State for completeness, initial responsiveness, and compliance with all mandatory requirements outlined in the RFP. All fifteen (15) proposals were deemed initially responsive and proceeded to stage 2.

Stage 2 – Technical Proposal Evaluation (750 points)
Review of the technical proposals was completed by the Multistate Sourcing Team. With a potential total of seven hundred fifty (750) points for this stage, each technical criteria listed a point value where each Bidder’s response was scored against the expectations laid out in the questions. The Technical Criteria included:
• Experience, skills and qualifications
• Scope of work
• Change management of standards
• Warranty, service, etc.
• Implementation and Promotion of the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement • Acceptance of Sample Master Agreement Terms & Conditions The evaluators’ total scores for each Bidder were averaged for a Technical Evaluation Score. Utilizing the second occurrence of the third largest natural break and consideration of the optimal number of Suppliers required to successfully supply Deliverables to Participating Entities and Purchasing Entities, Castle and King, Botach, and TXAT LLC did not make it through the Technical Evaluation and were not considered during the Cost Evaluation.

Therefore twelve (12) proposals proceeded to Stage 3.

Final Scoring of Suppliers that moved onto Stage 3:

Scores (total possible 750) – presented alphabetically
Company Technical
Score
Angel Armor 514
Armor Express 610
DFNDR Armor 558
GH Armor Systems 658
ONYX Protective Group 490
Point Blank 530
Safariland 514
Slate Solutions 622
Survival Armor 574
TYR Tactical 498
U.S. Armor Corporation 654
United Shield International 514
#16..
- 656 -

Final Scores of Suppliers that did not move onto Stage 3:

Scores (total possible 750) – presented alphabetically
Company Technical
Score
Botach 378
Castle and King 454
TXAT LLC 334
Stage 3 – Cost Proposal Evaluation (250 points)
Proposals at this stage were evaluated using the following formula for calculating cost points earned for MSRP/List Price Percentage Discounts for each category set:

Offeror’s Proposed Percentage Discount
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- X Cost Points Possible Highest Responsive Proposal Percentage Discount

EVALUATION SUMMARY & AWARD SELECTION
The RFP outlined a plan to issue an award to suppliers determined to be responsive and responsible, who best meet the RFP requirements, and present the best total value, including price as calculated consistent with the RFP.

Supplier scores for technical and cost were combined into a single total score per supplier per Category Group.

Provided below are the tables representing the total points earned in each Category Group for all suppliers who entered the Award Selection phase.1 Suppliers in this chart are listed in alphabetical order (for suppliers listed in order from highest-scoring supplier to lowest-scoring supplier, see attached Master Scorecard). Utilizing the largest natural break, TYR Tactical did not make it through the cost proposal evaluation. The Sourcing Team recommends awards to eleven (11) suppliers for Category Group 1, nine (9) suppliers for Category Group 2, and eleven (11) suppliers for Category Group 3. This recommended approach is intentional as it allows a choice of suppliers offering their approved Price Lists for the respective Category Groups they were awarded. This allows for access to multiple products meeting the required specifications, including NIJ certifications or ASTM verifications for Category Groups 1 and 2.

CATEGORY GROUP 1
• Market Basket NIJ 0101.07
• Market Basket NIJ 0101.06
Final Scoring of Suppliers to be awarded:

Scores are rounded (total possible 1,000) – presented alphabetically Company
Total
Score
Angel Armor 748
Armor Express 799
DFNDR Armor 640
GH Armor Systems 830

1 A more detailed analysis of the scoring is in the attached Excel doc- Body Armor Master Scorecard - FINAL #16..
- 657 -

ONYX Protective Group 695
Point Blank 712
Safariland 680
Slate Solutions 811
Survival Armor 824
U.S. Armor Corporation 814
United Shield International 668
Final Scoring of Supplier that will not be awarded Category Group 1 Scores are rounded (total possible 1,000)
Company TOTAL SCORE
TYR Tactical 535
CATEGORY GROUP 2
• Market Basket ASTM Helmets & Shields
• Non-Market Basket Helmets & Shields
Final Scoring of Suppliers to be awarded:

Scores are rounded (total possible 1,000) – presented alphabetically Company Total Score
Armor Express 799
DFNDR Armor 640
GH Armor Systems 830
Point Blank 710
Safariland 680
Slate Solutions 811
Survival Armor 824
U.S. Armor Corporation 814
United Shield International 668
Final Scoring of Supplier that will not be awarded Category Group 2 Scores are rounded (total possible 1,000)
Company TOTAL SCORE
TYR Tactical 529
CATEGORY GROUP 3
• Non-Market Basket (not including Helmets & Shields)
Final Scoring of Suppliers to be awarded:

Scores are rounded (total possible 1,000) – presented alphabetically Company Total Score
Angel Armor 748
Armor Express 799
DFNDR Armor 722
GH Armor Systems 830
#16..
- 658 -

ONYX Protective Group 695
Point Blank 712
Safariland 679
Slate Solutions 811
Survival Armor 824
U.S. Armor Corporation 814
United Shield International 668
Final Scoring of Supplier that will not be awarded Category Group 3 Scores are rounded (total possible 1,000)
Company Total Score
TYR Tactical 560

SOURCING TEAM EVALUATION MEETINGS
In-person evaluation meetings were held with the Sourcing Team from 01/14/2025 – 01/16/2025 and finalized upon receipt of clarifying information from proposals by the prescribed deadline(s). Final scoring was completed on January 16, 2025.

PROPOSED AWARDS
The suppliers listed below are recommended for award of a Master Agreement in the respective Category Group.

Category Group 1 – Market Basket NIJ 0101.07 / Market Basket NIJ 0101.06 • Angel Armor
• Armor Express
• DFNDR Armor
• GH Armor Systems
• ONYX Protective Group
• Point Blank
• Safariland
• Slate Solutions
• Survival Armor
• U.S. Armor Corporation
• United Shield International
Category Group 2 – ASTM Helmets & Shields / Non-Market Basket Helmets & Shields • Armor Express
• DFNDR Armor
• GH Armor Systems
• Point Blank
• Safariland
• Slate Solutions
• Survival Armor
• U.S. Armor Corporation
• United Shield International
Category Group 3 – Non-Market Basket (not including Helmets & Shields) • Angel Armor
• Armor Express
• DFNDR Armor
• GH Armor Systems
#16..
- 659 -

• ONYX Protective Group
• Point Blank
• Safariland
• Slate Solutions
• Survival Armor
• U.S. Armor Corporation
• United Shield International

POTENTIAL VOLUME
• ITPs submitted: 15
• Current 2024 annual spend: $87,883,408.97
• Current usage: 246
o 207 State Participating Addenda
o 39 Non-State Participating Addenda

SUPPLIERS IN PORTFOLIO
• Prior RFP awardees: 12
• New RFP awardees: 11
• Incumbents: 9

KEY BENEFITS OF THIS RE-SOLICITED PORTFOLIO
This re-solicited NASPO ValuePoint portfolio will replace the expiring Colorado-led Body Armor and Ballistic Resistant Products portfolio, providing users across the nation with a continued broad range of options for related body armor and ballistic-resistant products that meet the requirements established by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and ASTM.

PRICING
Master Agreement pricing is based on approved Price Lists. All offerings and price adjustments are subject to the Lead State's review, negotiation, or rejection prior to any Price List updates in the Master Agreement.

CONCLUSION
The State of Colorado and the Multistate Sourcing Team reviewed and approved this award recommendation.

We thank the Lead State and Sourcing Team for their continued efforts and ask that the State of Colorado be permitted to move forward with negotiations on the recommended NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement awards.

Thank you for your consideration!
#16..
- 660 -
#16..
- 661 -
#16..
- 662 -
#16..
- 663 -
#16..
- 664 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

January 13, 2026
Date: December 17, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: William Wong, Director of Utilities
SUBJECT: Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association Groundwater Sustainability Agency
2027 Groundwater Sustainability Plan Update
CONTACT: Timothy Barahona, Assistant Engineer
209-577-5485, [email protected]
DESCRIPTION:

Consider approving the Draft Groundwater Use Management Program and Draft Well Mitigation Plan as part of the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association Groundwater Sustainability Agency’s 2027 Groundwater Sustainability Plan Update. (Funding Source: Water Fund)
STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

The recommended action supports the 2025-2026 City’s Strategic Plan Initiatives, Goal D:

Provide safe, efficient, and reliable infrastructure through proactive community investment, maintenance, and sustainability efforts.

BACKGROUND:

In September of 2014, Governor Edmund G. Brown signed into law the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) of 2014 which required, among other items, the formation of Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSA) and the preparation of Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSP) with a focus on long-term groundwater management.

On January 24, 2017, by Resolution No. 2017-30, Council elected to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the following local agencies to form the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association (STRGBA) GSA:

City of Modesto
City of Oakdale
City of Riverbank
City of Waterford
Stanislaus County
Tuolumne County
Modesto Irrigation District
Oakdale Irrigation District
#17..
- 665 -
City Council, January 13, 2026
Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association Groundwater Sustainability Agency
2027 Groundwater Sustainability Plan Update

The goal of the STRGBA GSA GSP is to identify the basin management objectives, provide a framework for coordinating groundwater management activities between the member agencies and ensure the reliability of the subbasin’s groundwater as a safe and sustainable water supply.

As part of SGMA requirements identified in the California Water Code and the California Code of Regulations, the GSP shall be evaluated and updated by the GSA every five years and an annual report shall be submitted to the Department of Water Resources each year.

On August 14, 2018, by Resolution No. 2018-340, Council approved an Agreement with Todd Groundwater for the development of a GSP for the Modesto Subbasin.

On June 9, 2020, by Resolution No. 2020-256, Council approved a First Amendment to the Agreement with Todd Groundwater for the development of a GSP for the Modesto Subbasin.

On February 1, 2022, by Resolution No. 2022-067, Council approved a Second Amendment to the Agreement with Todd Groundwater for the development of a GSP for the Modesto Subbasin.

DISCUSSION:

Upon their initial review the Department of Water Resources (DWR) determined that the 2022 GSP was incomplete and identified the following deficiencies:

1. The Lack of an Established Well Mitigation Plan:

Development of a strategic approach to addressing well failures for residents within the GSA management area that may result from extreme dry conditions, or GSA activities in the vicinity.

2. The Lack of a Groundwater Use and Management Actions Program Establishment of groundwater pumping reduction guidelines and a process for their implementation if groundwater levels fall below predetermined thresholds.

On July 9, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-270, Council adopted the revised 2022 GSP and documented their commitment to developing and implementing a Well Mitigation Plan and Management Actions Program in the Modesto Subbasin.

DWR approved the revised 2022 GSP contingent upon the GSA executing its proposed action items; To fulfill this obligation the GSA through the Modesto Irrigation District (MID) hired Woodard and Curran, with Todd Groundwater as their Subconsultant, to prepare a Draft Groundwater Use and Management Program and Draft Well Mitigation Plan to be submitted as part of the 2027 GSP Update.

STRGBA GSA hosted five (5) workshops in 2025 over the course of the development of the Draft Groundwater Use Management Program and Draft Well Mitigation Plan to collaborate with regional stake holders and interested members of the public, collecting feedback and addressing questions and concerns.
#17..
- 666 -
City Council, January 13, 2026
Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association Groundwater Sustainability Agency
2027 Groundwater Sustainability Plan Update

Copies of the draft documents are available on the STRGBA GSA website at:
https://www.strgba.org/Home/GSP
FISCAL IMPACT:

The costs associated with the development of the Draft Groundwater Use and Management Program and Draft Well Mitigation Plan are as follows:

Engineering Consultant Agreement – Woodard and Curran $250,000 Additional Services (if needed) $100,000
Total $350,000
Each member agency of the STRGBA GSA will be responsible for reimbursing MID for up to $50,000; 1/7 of the total cost of the Consultant Agreement through the adopted STRGBA GSA Operating Budget.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
At the meeting held on June 25, 2018, the Finance Committee considered the STRGBA GSA Cost Sharing Agreement associated with the Consultant Agreement with Todd Groundwater for the Development of a GSP for the Modesto Subbasin, where they recommended that it be forwarded to Council for approval.

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

Pursuant to California Water Code Section 10728.6 of the Public Resources Code, the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act do not apply to the preparation of plans related to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution approving the Draft Groundwater Use and Management Program and Draft Well Mitigation Plan as part of the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association Groundwater Sustainability Agency’s 2027 Groundwater Sustainability Plan Update.

Approved by:

William Wong, Director of Utilities
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. Draft Modesto Subbasin Well Mitigation Plan

3. Draft Groundwater Use Management Program
#17..
- 667 -
1/13/26/Utilities/TBarahona/Item X 1 2026-XX

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DRAFT GROUNDWATER USE AND

MANAGEMENT PLAN AND DRAFT WELL MITIGATION PLAN AS PART OF

THE STANISLAUS AND TUOLUMNE RIVERS GROUNDWATER BASIN
ASSOCIATION GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY’S 2027

GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN UPDATE
WHEREAS, the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association (STRGBA) Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA), consisting of the City of Modesto, City of Oakdale, City of Riverbank, City of Waterford, Stanislaus County, Tuolumne County, Modesto Irrigation District and Oakdale Irrigation District was formed on February 16, 2017, for the purpose of managing groundwater in the Modesto Subbasin, within its jurisdictional boundaries, pursuant to the requirements of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA); and
WHEREAS, the STRGBA GSA coordinated with the County of Tuolumne GSA on their respective groundwater sustainability plan (GSP), and which was approved by both the STRGBA GSA and the County of Tuolumne GSA; and WHEREAS, the final Modesto Subbasin GSP was submitted to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) on January 31, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the 2022 Amended GSP for the Modesto Subbasin was approved by DWR on February 27, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City acknowledges that during the 20-year GSP implementation period it will be necessary to implement projects and management actions to achieve and maintain sustainable groundwater conditions in the Modesto Subbasin on or before 2042; and
#17..
- 668 -
1/13/26/Utilities/TBarahona/Item X 2 2026-XX
WHEREAS, the City acknowledges that successful implementation of planned GSP projects to achieve their intended recharge benefits during the 20-year GSP implementation period (prior to 2042) is dependent in part on uncertainties related to hydrologic conditions, including precipitation and snowpack, and available water supply during that time period; and
WHEREAS, on July 9, 2024, the City approved the development of demand management actions by January 31, 2026, with implementation of those demand management actions by January 31, 2027; and
WHEREAS, on July 9, 2024, the City also approved the 2022 Revised GSP for the Modesto Subbasin, and which was submitted to DWR; and WHEREAS, on February 27, 2025, the 2022 Revised GSP was approved by DWR; and
WHEREAS, the STRGBA GSA has developed a Draft Groundwater Use Management Program and Draft Well Mitigation Plan through collaboration of the STRGBA GSA member agencies with input from stakeholders through five (5) public workshops; and
WHEREAS, the Groundwater Use Management Program provides the framework to allocate the sustainable yield of the Modesto Subbasin by management area, allows each management area steward to take actions to allocate the management area’s portion of the sustainable yield and to take actions to meet the allocation; and WHEREAS, the Groundwater Use Management Program is an adaptive plan that provides tools for the management area steward(s) to respond and take various actions and an implementation schedule that may be further refined in the future; and #17..
- 669 -
1/13/26/Utilities/TBarahona/Item X 3 2026-XX
WHEREAS, the Well Mitigation Plan develops a strategic approach to addressing well failures for residents within the GSA management area that may result from extreme dry conditions, or GSA activities in the vicinity; and
WHEREAS, the City acknowledges that it cannot control groundwater conditions caused by actions not taken by the GSA; and
WHEREAS, the City commits to the implementation of this Groundwater Use Management Program and Well Mitigation Plan in collaboration with the STRGBA GSA, its member agencies and the County of Tuolumne GSA.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby approves the Draft Groundwater Use and Management Plan and Draft Well Mitigation Plan as part of the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association Groundwater Sustainability Agency’s 2027 Groundwater Sustainability Plan Update.
#17..
- 670 -
1/13/26/Utilities/TBarahona/Item X 4 2026-XX
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 13th day of January, 2026, by _______________, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by _______________, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#17..
- 671 -
Stanislaus & Tuolumne Rivers
Groundwater Basin Association
Groundwater Sustainability Agency
Draft
Modesto Subbasin
Well Mitigation Plan
November 5, 2025 Draft
GSA Adoption Anticipated January 14, 2026
#17..
- 672 -
ii
Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction................................................................................................................................. 1 Background.............................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 2 Program Management.................................................................................................................. 3 Partnerships with Existing Programs .......................................................................................... 3 Program Development Committee ............................................................................................ 4 Technical Review Committee .................................................................................................... 4 Program Process.......................................................................................................................... 5 Eligibility .................................................................................................................................. 5 Application Process.................................................................................................................. 6 Process for Establishing STRGBA GSA-Related Well Impacts...................................................... 9 Process for Implementing Mitigation Measures.......................................................................... 9 Emergency Water Supply....................................................................................................... 9 Interim Solution ..................................................................................................................10 Long-term Solutions ...........................................................................................................10 Plan Outreach............................................................................................................................10 Funding and Anticipated Costs...................................................................................................11 #17..
- 673 -
iii
Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater

ACRONYMS
CV-SALTS Central Valley Salinity Alternatives for Long-Term Sustainability DWR California Department of Water Resources
GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agency
GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan
NGOs non-governmental organizations
PMAs Projects and Management Actions
SAFER Safe and Affordable Funding for Equity and Resilience SHE Self-Help Enterprises
SGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
STRGBA GSA Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association Groundwater Sustainability Agency
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TAC Technical Advisory Committee
WY Water Year (October 1 through September 30)
VWC Valley Water Collaborative
#17..
- 674 -
1 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
Introduction
Background
In September 2014, the Governor of California signed legislation creating the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) “to provide local groundwater sustainability agencies with the authority and technical and financial assistance necessary to sustainably manage groundwater” (Water Code, § 10720.1(d)). Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) were provided the authority to adopt rules, regulations, ordinances, and resolutions for the sustainable management of a groundwater basin and to conduct and carry out activities necessary to achieve and maintain sustainable conditions.

The Modesto Subbasin (5-22.02) (Subbasin), a high-priority basin as defined by the Department of Water Resources (DWR), is subject to SGMA and is being managed in compliance with SGMA.

Groundwater management within the Stanislaus County footprint of the Modesto Subbasin is being coordinated and overseen by the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association Groundwater Sustainability Agency (STRGBA GSA), consisting of the following member agencies: the City of Modesto, Modesto Irrigation District, City of Oakdale, Oakdale Irrigation District, City of Riverbank, City of Waterford and County of Stanislaus. The STRGBA GSA is governed by a Committee (GSA Committee) made up of one designated staff member from each of the seven member agencies. The STRGBA GSA was formed on February 16, 2017, for the purpose of sustainably managing groundwater in the Modesto Subbasin, within its jurisdictional boundaries and pursuant to the requirements of SGMA. The STRGBA GSA coordinated with the County of Tuolumne GSA to develop a single, coordinated groundwater sustainability plan (GSP) for the Modesto Subbasin, which was submitted to DWR on January 31, 2022.

In January 2024, DWR determined the GSP to be incomplete and identified two deficiencies.

The County of Tuolumne and STRGBA GSAs submitted a revised GSP to DWR on July 12, 2024 (Revised GSP). The Revised GSP, which was approved by DWR on February 27, 2025, is responsive to DWR-defined Corrective Actions and incorporates additional details, analyses, projects, and management actions. The STRGBA GSA also committed to development and implementation of a Well Mitigation Program (Program) no later than January 31, 2026. This Well Mitigation Plan (Plan) provides the framework for the Program to address Management Action 7 described in the Revised GSP.

Initial conception of the Program is described in the Revised GSP. This description addresses domestic wells drilled in the Subbasin and the Sustainable Management Criteria (SMC), including Minimum Thresholds, which define undesirable results based on those wells affected by groundwater level declines. An analysis of the number of wells that could potentially go dry with additional groundwater level declines is described in Revised GSP Section 6.3.3.1. A #17..
- 675 -
2 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
description of the conceptual Program is provided in Revised GSP Section 8.1.3. In addition, Appendix C of the Revised GSP presents the Resolution Adopting a Revised Groundwater Sustainability Plan and Documenting the Commitment to Develop and Implement a Well Mitigation Program and Demand Management Actions in the Modesto Groundwater Subbasin.

The projects and management actions in the Revised GSP are intended to achieve sustainability and to reduce the potential for more wells to go dry. Modeling of the Projects and Management Actions (PMAs) in the Revised GSP demonstrates the feasibility of achieving sustainability by 2042. However, the STRGBA GSA recognizes that the GSP objectives in arresting groundwater level declines quickly could be hindered by significant drought cycles or other factors.

Purpose
The purpose of the Program is to provide mitigation for drinking water wells that have experienced adverse impacts due to declining regional groundwater levels associated with groundwater pumping during the GSP implementation period, since January 31, 2022. As described in the Modesto Subbasin Revised GSP (Section 6.3.3.1), an analysis was conducted that included all 4,563 water supply wells (municipal, industrial, domestic and agricultural) with available construction information in the Modesto Subbasin. This analysis showed potential impacts to water supply wells due to groundwater levels declining below established Minimum Thresholds (MTs). Potential impacts are expected to be limited to an interim period before planned Projects and Management Actions are fully implemented.

The focus of this Program is on mitigation for drinking water wells that have experienced adverse impacts due to declining groundwater levels resulting from basin management actions during the GSP implementation period (defined as ending in 2042 by SGMA legislation).

Drinking water wells are defined here as any well used to supply potable water to a household, including domestic wells that supply water for potable, minor irrigation, and other domestic purposes. It may also include state small water systems with between 5 and 14 connections.

The Revised GSP analysis also considered potential impacts to water quality and land subsidence. The analysis indicated that groundwater levels declining below the MTs during the implementation period would not likely have an impact on groundwater quality or on land subsidence. Consequently, this Program focuses on the direct impacts of drinking water wells going dry. In general, a well is considered to be going dry when water can no longer be pumped in sufficient quantity to meet domestic water demands because groundwater levels have fallen too low for the well to produce the required groundwater quantities. While the well is going dry, this typically results in diminished well yield or unreliable productivity. Once groundwater levels have fallen below the pump intake, the well is considered dry and does not produce any water.

In some cases, it may be possible to lower the pump to restore sufficient yield, but in other cases, the well must be deepened or a new, deeper well must be constructed. #17..
- 676 -
3 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
The purpose of this document is to describe a detailed process for mitigating impacts on drinking water wells adversely affected by declining groundwater levels during the GSP implementation period.

Program Management
This document establishes a framework for the mitigation of drinking water wells demonstrated to have been adversely affected by declining groundwater levels resulting from basin management activities during the SGMA implementation period. It has been developed in consideration of recommendations found in the following two public documents: Framework for a Drinking Water Well Impact Mitigation Program (Self-Help Enterprises, et al.) and Considerations for Identifying and Addressing Drinking Water Well Impacts (CA Department of Water Resources).

Partnerships with Existing Programs
There are local non-governmental programs that offer support for those affected by impaired access to drinking water within the Modesto Subbasin and across the San Joaquin Valley. During implementation of the Program, additional agencies or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) may be identified for potential collaboration that have interest in or authority over drinking water. The Valley Water Collaborative (VWC), for example, was formed to address nitrate groundwater contamination in private domestic wells used for drinking water in the Modesto and Turlock Subbasins. VWC provides well testing and replacement water or water treatment systems for nitrate contamination to all qualifying applicants, regardless of income level.

Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) is another NGO that offers emergency drinking water supplies, longterm mitigation support, and well stewardship educational resources for those who qualify under their program in Stanislaus County. SHE is a non-profit in the San Joaquin Valley that can provide water quality testing and emergency water service (including bottled water, outdoor tank and hauled water support) for eligible landowners (see https://www.selfhelpenterprises.org). When first contacted for assistance with a dry well, SHE establishes basic eligibility (e.g., well / land ownership); the eligible applicants must then submit an application to SHE with information on the well, property, and household, including income.

SHE provides emergency response (e.g., bottled water) within 24 hours and conducts an onsite well assessment. If a well replacement is warranted, the process includes completion of a grant agreement between SHE and the well owner. SHE provides a well modification/replacement grant for qualifying landowners who make 80% or less of the mean household income and are willing to not sell their property for a 5-year period after well replacement. Currently, the SHE grants (funded by the SWRCB) can amount to nearly $60,000.

The STRGBA GSA has coordinated this Program with SHE to minimize overlapping efforts. The STRGBA GSA will enter into an agreement to reimburse SHE for costs associated with program #17..
- 677 -
4 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
administration (including bilingual communications and well stewardship educational services), emergency and interim drinking water supplies, and long-term mitigation measures for all drinking water well applications that qualify for Modesto Subbasin mitigation. SHE serves as the contract mediator and lender for the applicants to make arrangements with contractors such as well drillers, pump companies, and plumbers to perform the long-term mitigation.

Program Development Committee
The STRGBA GSA has established a Well Mitigation Program Committee (WMP Committee) and will continue to appoint Committee members at its discretion. This WMP Committee will include representatives from STRGBA GSA member agencies. This WMP Committee will further develop and refine this Plan and recommend approval by the STRGBA GSA when modifications are needed. Upon approval of this Program by the STRGBA GSA, the WMP Committee will implement the Program as defined in the Plan.

Consistent with the stated purpose of this Program, the WMP Committee will have the responsibility for development and implementation of the Program, including but not limited to the following:
• Recommendations to the STRGBA GSA to engage in public outreach. • Recommendations to the STRGBA GSA to collaborate and contract with nongovernmental organizations to assist with outreach and/or well mitigation services. • Coordination with County Office of Emergency Services to provide well mitigation services.
• Development and oversight of the process for affected well owners to apply for mitigation.
• Development and oversight of the procedures for application review, decision, and appeal including decisions to provide complete or partial mitigation or to reject an application.
• Establishment of a Well Mitigation Technical Review Committee (TR Committee) to review each application for eligibility and potential mitigation. • Development and oversight of the process for well owner agreements for mitigation. • Keeping the STRGBA GSA informed of Program implementation and any claims that are received.

Technical Review Committee
The WMP Committee will establish a Technical Review Committee for each claim under this Program. The TR Committee will consist of the following members:
• A STRGBA GSA member agency representative where the well is located or a County representative if the well is within a non-district area or outside City limits. • A registered Environmental Health Specialist from the Stanislaus County Environmental Health Department or Environmental Resources Department. #17..
- 678 -
5 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
• At the WMP Committee and/or STRGBA GSA’s discretion and designation, a qualified technical representative (e.g., Professional Geologist or Engineer) that is not part of the STRGBA GSA member agency where the well is located.

The TR Committee will document the eligibility and submit a recommendation regarding STRGBA GSA mitigation to the WMP Committee.

Program Process
Eligibility
The Program is intended to address impacts to drinking water wells from declining groundwater levels associated with groundwater pumping during the GSP implementation period. Drinking water wells are defined as any well used to supply potable water to a household, including domestic wells that supply water for potable, landscape irrigation and other domestic purposes to several homes or parcels. It may also include state small water systems with between 5 and 14 connections. Mitigation for other types of supply wells (e.g., agricultural irrigation, industrial or stock wells) or for non-domestic uses may be considered under this Program by the STRGBA GSA on a case-by-case basis.

At this time, emergency drinking water supplies can be requested in Stanislaus County (and elsewhere in the San Joaquin Valley) via online request or telephone call to an NGO, such as VWC or SHE, which establishes basic information (e.g., well location) and eligibility to receive emergency bottled water under those programs and then requires additional information in an application.

This Program is being coordinated with non-governmental programs, such as SHE, in order to avoid duplication of efforts. As noted above, this Program has been developed to address well impacts due to declining groundwater levels associated with groundwater pumping during the GSP implementation period. To be eligible for mitigation assistance from the STRGBA GSA’s Program, the WMP Committee will require that an application from the well owner be submitted to SHE. SHE will then review the application to determine whether the well impacts (including failure or diminished well yields such that reasonable demands can no longer be met) occurred on or after January 31, 2022, and are attributable to sustainable groundwater management under the Subbasin GSP. January 31, 2022, is the date that the GSP was adopted by the STRGBA GSA and submitted to DWR.

The County of Tuolumne and STRGBA GSAs manage groundwater levels in the Modesto Subbasin in accordance with the GSP, including as it may be amended or revised in the future.

Wells eligible for the Program are those that have experienced adverse impacts due to declining groundwater levels as a result of basin management under the Subbasin GSP. #17..
- 679 -
6 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
At its discretion, the WMP Committee may also review an application and recommend that the Well Mitigation Technical Advisory Committee address other aquifer problems affecting a well, such as water quality problems caused by STRGBA GSA basin management actions that occurred after January 31, 2022. Water quality problems that are not the result of STRGBA GSA basin management actions will not be eligible for mitigation under this Program.

Application Process
The Program application will be available on the SHE website. A link to the application will also be posted on the STRGBA GSA website (STRGBA.org). If requested, designated STRGBA GSA and/or SHE staff will assist applicants with filing the application.

The Program Application Process involves the following steps that begin with completion and submittal of an application by the well owner.

Completion and Submittal of Application. The well owner will fill out an application form and submit it to SHE. The application will request available information from the well owner that includes, but may not be limited to, the following:
• Well owner and contact information
• Well location and age
• Well construction information such as location and access, total well depth, screen interval depths, annular seal depth, and pump type and depth • Inspection reports from a licensed well driller or pump and well contractor identifying the cause of the well failure
• Any other evidence in applicant’s possession that the well failure was caused by STRGBA GSA basin management actions occurring after January 31, 2022 (e.g., depth to water measurements from nearby wells, etc.)
Applicants are encouraged to provide evidence, such as a well assessment report from a licensed well driller identifying the cause of the well failure, other certification from a qualified professional, and all other evidence in applicant’s possession to demonstrate that the failure was caused by STRGBA GSA basin management actions. Applicants must allow onsite inspection of their well facilities as necessary by staff of SHE, the TR Committee and the WMP Committee to be eligible for assistance. A right-of-entry agreement granting SHE access to the property is required to be completed.

The WMP Committee is authorized to summarily reject any application if the well failure can be remedied by implementing mechanical or construction solutions that are not related to Subbasin management (such as replacing failed electrical or mechanical pump components with no need to re-drill the well). This Program does not apply to a well installed after January 31, 2022, if the well was installed with a screened interval depth shallower than minimum threshold levels as designated in the Modesto Subbasin GSP. #17..
- 680 -
7 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
Limitations Period. All applications brought under this Program must have had well impacts that occurred after January 31, 2022, and were caused by STRGBA GSA basin management activities.

Applications for impacts that occurred between January 31, 2022, and the adoption of this Program must be submitted within six months of the date of adoption of this Program. The limitations period for applications submitted after the adoption of this policy will be the limitations process and period provided by the California Government Tort Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 and following).

Assessment of Eligibility. SHE will initially review the applications and if an application is potentially eligible for the STRGBA GSA’s Program, SHE will forward the application to the WMP Committee. The TR Committee, assigned by the WMP Committee, will then be responsible for reviewing applications (including attachments) to assess the applicant’s eligibility to receive mitigation under the Program. Participation in the STRGBA GSA’s Program will not be limited or otherwise dictated by the well owner’s income. The TR Committee will have the authority to conduct an independent investigation of the evidence (at their discretion and at the STRGBA GSA’s expense), including, but not limited to, engaging hydrogeologists and well drillers, well inspection and testing, research of county well records, and requesting records from the applicant.

The TR Committee will provide written documentation to the WMP Committee of its determination regarding the applicant’s eligibility for mitigation and a recommendation of whether to mitigate and how to mitigate. Upon concurrence with the TR Committee’s recommendation, the WMP Committee will forward this decision to SHE. Otherwise, should the WMP Committee decide that further review and discussion is warranted, the TR Committee’s determination and recommendation will be forwarded to the STRGBA GSA for final direction to SHE. In either case, SHE will communicate the final decision to the well owner.

The WMP Committee may decide to provide complete or partial mitigation for a particular application based on the TR Committee’s determination of whether the well failure was related to the STRGBA GSA’s groundwater management as opposed to other contributing factors, such as the construction of the well.

An applicant may appeal a decision of the WMP Committee by submitting a written appeal by email to the STRGBA GSA at [email protected] within 30 days of the decision. The appeal shall contain a copy of the original application, the decision, and a statement of the basis for the appeal. The STRGBA GSA Chair will include the appeal on the agenda for the next STRGBA GSA meeting and provide written notice and the agenda to the appellant. The STRGBA GSA will act on the appeal and issue a written decision. The decision of the STRGBA GSA will be final.

Well Owner Agreement. After application, eligibility, and mitigation development (coordinated with SHE), any mitigation must be accompanied by an agreement between the well owner and SHE. The agreement will include but is not limited to the following:
#17..
- 681 -
8 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
• Priority. The Program will be operated on a first-come, first-serve basis as of the date a completed and submitted application is received by SHE. • Well access agreement (consistent with SHE agreement). • Mitigation Award. To the extent sufficient funding exists, the maximum mitigation award provided under the Program will be $40,000. In no case, is the maximum mitigation award guaranteed and the STRGBA GSA retains exclusive control over the determination of the maximum mitigation award. The STRGBA GSA will be responsible for the maximum mitigation award or the actual cost of the mitigation, whichever is less. The well owner may seek additional and/or alternate funding beyond the mitigation provided by the Program. Eligible mitigation in excess of $40,000 will be reviewed by the TR Committee on a case-by-case basis with review of the following criteria:
a. Receipt and review of multiple bids with comparable construction means and methods yielding an estimated mitigation cost exceeding $40,000. b. System consolidation yielding new domestic water service to two or more domestic water users.
c. Construction means and methods review, including, but not limited to required depth and required casing diameter.
d. Occurrence of additional associated costs (e.g., pump replacement). • Grant term. SHE requires a 5-year grant term during which the well owner must (1) maintain continuous residence on the well site property (if owner occupied), and (2) not transfer the title of the property within 5 years, otherwise the grant would need to be repaid.
• Preferred Contractors. The STRGBA GSA intends that all analysis, inspection, and eligible mitigation be completed by competent and qualified contractors. SHE maintains a list of approved contractors for program participants to select from and requires the following from each contractor: a contractor application, W-9 Form, C57 contractor license for drillers, proof of workers compensation insurance, proof of general liability insurance, and Federal contractor suspension and debarment check.
• Recordation of Mitigation Award. Eligible mitigation provided under the Program for diminished yield (dry well) issues will only occur once per drinking water well and will run with the land. This Agreement will be recorded with the applicable county and will bind the well owner and/or their heirs and assigns. Recordation will not occur until mitigation is complete.
• Post-mitigation Responsibility. Once the mitigation work is completed, the well owner will be responsible for operation, maintenance, and repair of the water well. • Continuing Education. Through execution of the agreement with SHE, the well owner will acknowledge and confirm having successfully completed education on well maintenance (e.g., SHE’s education program).
• Monitoring. The well owner will agree to allow the STRGBA GSA, at the STRGBA GSA’s sole discretion, to access and monitor groundwater levels in the new or modified well. #17..
- 682 -
9 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
The well owner will agree to the public use of groundwater level data that may be collected for the purposes of complying with SGMA or as deemed appropriate by the STRGBA GSA.
• Indemnification of the STRGBA GSA consistent with then applicable agreement. • Easement or land use permissions consistent with then applicable agreement. No mitigation, except for interim and emergency solutions, will commence until the well owner has executed an agreement with SHE.

Process for Establishing STRGBA GSA-Related Well Impacts The TR Committee will review the application provided by SHE via the WMP Committee and, with the authority to conduct an independent investigation, will provide a recommendation about the condition of the well and the cause(s) of the well failure. The TR Committee will consider other contributing factors, such as the condition and use of the well, or the condition of pumping equipment, in determining the degree to which an applicant is eligible for mitigation. The TR Committee will make a recommended determination of the cause of well failure and whether or not an application is eligible for mitigation, which the WMP Committee may adopt in its decision. The WMP Committee will consider the recommendation of the TR Committee and may also consider other contributing factors. Upon concurrence with the TR Committee’s recommendation, the WMP Committee will forward this decision to SHE.

Otherwise, should the WMP Committee decide that further review and discussion is warranted, the TR Committee’s determination and recommendation will be forwarded to the STRGBA GSA for final direction to SHE. In either case, SHE will communicate the final decision to the well owner. If appealed to the STRGBA GSA, the STRGBA GSA will take all relevant factors into consideration in making a final decision.

Process for Implementing Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures may include emergency water supply, interim solutions, and long-term solutions. Emergency water supplies will be provided by SHE after receiving an eligible request and application. To continue emergency water supply or to access interim or long-term solutions funded by the STRGBA GSA, the landowner must provide authorization to allow for well access.

Emergency Water Supply
SHE will ensure that an emergency water supply is provided to all applicants who have submitted a complete application with a reasonable complaint for damages. An emergency water supply consists of bottled water intended to meet drinking water and cooking needs while the application is reviewed and processed. If the application is approved, SHE will ensure that an interim emergency water supply will continue at the STRGBA GSA’s expense until the mitigation is complete.
#17..
- 683 -
10 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
Interim Solution
Interim solutions may include ongoing deliveries of bottled drinking water and/or temporary provision and filling of a water tank (hauled water) to meet drinking water, hygiene, and cooking needs while the application is reviewed and processed. Every effort will be made to process applications in a timely manner and to provide adequate domestic water supply to applicants while applications are verified, site-specific mitigation eligibility and requirements are determined, and mitigation is implemented and completed. If the application is found to be ineligible under this plan, the WMP Committee and/or SHE may refer the application to another agency or program for additional assistance, if possible.

Long-term Solutions
Following review and initial approval of the application, the most appropriate long-term mitigation measure will be selected. Long-term mitigation measures may include setting the well pump at a deeper depth, replacing the well pump, deepening the well, or replacing the well (including destruction of the existing well). As an alternative to well replacement, a mitigation measure could involve connection to a nearby municipal or public water system. The TR Committee will make a recommendation for long-term mitigation. Upon concurrence with the TR Committee’s recommendation, the WMP Committee will forward this decision to SHE.

Otherwise, should the WMP Committee decide that further review and discussion is warranted, the TR Committee’s recommendation will be forwarded to the STRGBA GSA for final direction to SHE. In either case, SHE will communicate the final decision to the well owner. If appealed to the STRGBA GSA, the STRGBA GSA will take all relevant factors into consideration in making a final decision.

Plan Outreach
Plan Outreach will be coordinated with SHE or other consultant and the STRGBA GSA. The WMP Committee will recommend staff or representatives for the STRGBA GSA’s approval to engage in public outreach that will inform well owners and residents of their opportunity to request assistance under this Program, and how to apply for assistance.

Outreach during Program development may include, but is not limited to:

• Discussion of the Plan at public STRGBA GSA meetings and at workshops. • Establishment of Program-specific information on the STRGBA GSA website (English and Spanish) https://www.strgba.org/. This will include a link to the SHE website.

Outreach during Program implementation will be coordinated with SHE and include information about when and how to submit an application, and the subsequent assessment process. It will include the following:
#17..
- 684 -
11 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
• Maintenance of the Program-specific information on the STRGBA GSA website. • Regular update and discussion at public STRGBA GSA meetings. • Regular reporting in Annual Reports of mitigation efforts and accomplishments.

Funding and Anticipated Costs
A Well Mitigation Fund (Fund) has been established to finance program implementation. The purpose of the Fund is twofold: to support implementation of the Program as described above, and to provide funding for well mitigation in response to eligible applications at the discretion of the STRGBA GSA as described below.

Initial Funding. The Program is initially being funded by the STRGBA GSA as part of their respective annual budgets and apportioned between the STRGBA GSA using the existing annual budget allocation methodology.

Baseline Fund. To initiate implementation of the Program, the STRGBA GSA has established a baseline Well Mitigation Fund amounting to three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000).

Annual Funding. The STRGBA GSA has agreed to fund the Program on an annual basis as may be required to address the needs of the Program until groundwater sustainability is achieved. The STRGBA GSA member agencies will meet and confer in good faith to determine the appropriate funding mechanism, replenishment amount, and STRGBA GSA member allocation methodology prior to Fund replenishment. Funding for the Program will be recommended by the WMP Committee and approved by the STRGBA GSA.

According to DWR’s Dry Well Reporting System, 15 domestic wells were reported dry or failed since the GSP was adopted (13 in 2022, 2 in 2023, and 0 in 2024). However, it is unclear whether these dry or failed wells were due to GSA management of groundwater levels. As such, it is not possible to estimate the number of future eligible claims and annual costs.

It is anticipated that the Program funding will come from one, or a combination, of the following sources established by the Parties:
• STRGBA GSA funds
• One or more STRGBA GSA member agencies
• Funds generated through implementation of projects and management actions (e.g., fines and/or penalties)
• County/state/federal funding, as available
• Other sources, as identified.

Accounting. Annual funding will be placed in STRGBA GSA’s account. #17..
- 685 -
12 Draft Well Mitigation Plan
Modesto Subbasin Todd Groundwater
Funding Cycle. The budget cycle of the Program will be on a calendar year basis.

Funding and Implementation Review. Not less than once per year, the STRGBA GSA will convene a joint meeting of WMP Committee to review Program implementation progress in that year and plan for Program implementation in the subsequent year.

In-Kind Services. Each STRGBA GSA member agency is likely to provide in-kind services and subsequently incur in-kind costs as part of continued Program development and management.

These costs will be the responsibility of each STRGBA GSA member agency unless otherwise agreed to in writing.

Supplemental Funding.

SHE provides a well modification/replacement grant for qualifying landowners who make 80% or less of the mean household income and are willing to not sell their property for a 5-year period after well replacement. Currently, the SHE grants (funded by the SWRCB) can amount to nearly $60,000. If an applicant does not qualify for mitigation through STRGBA GSA’s Program, then the applicant may be eligible for mitigation by SHE. #17..
- 686 -
Modesto
Subbasin
Groundwater
Use
Management
Program
DRAFT
0012848.00

STRGBA GSA
November 10, 2025
woodardcurran.com
801 T Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
800.426.4262
#17..
- 687 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) i Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE NO.

1. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND......................................................................................................1-1

1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2.1 Modesto Subbasin ............................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.2.2 Determination Letter and Commitments .................................................................................. 1-3

2. GROUNDWATER ALLOCATION FRAMEWORK .............................................................................2-1

2.1 Groundwater Allocation Framework ....................................................................................................... 2-1

2.1.1 Sustainable Yield ................................................................................................................................. 2-2

2.1.2 Special Considerations...................................................................................................................... 2-2

2.1.2.1 Developed Water Supply Users ..................................................................................... 2-3

2.1.2.2 De Minimis Water Users ................................................................................................... 2-4

2.1.2.3 Municipal Water Users ...................................................................................................... 2-4

2.1.3 Allocation Framework Methodology .......................................................................................... 2-5

3. IMPLEMENTATION .........................................................................................................................3-9

3.1 Adaptive Management Strategies ......................................................................................................... 3-12

4. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ......................................................................................................4-1 TABLES
Table 1: Modesto Subbasin Stewards
Table 2: Developed Supply in the Modesto Subbasin
Table 3: Baseline Modesto Subbasin Groundwater Allocations Table 4: Collaborative Management of Groundwater Allocations Table 5: NDE Management Area Reduction Schedule

FIGURES
Figure 1: Modesto Subbasin Management Areas
Figure 2: GWUMP Response Levels
Figure 3: Management Area Action Plan Development Process Figure 4: Action Plan Content
Figure 5: GWUMP Implementation Schedule
#17..
- 688 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 1-1 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025

1. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND

1.1 Purpose
On January 18, 2024, the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) issued an Incomplete Determination letter to the Modesto Groundwater Subbasin (Subbasin) for their 2022 Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP or Plan). In that letter, DWR stated that the Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) “…should revise the GSP to include a reasonable means to arrest groundwater level declines and stop the overdraft that is continuing to occur in the Subbasin. Specifically, the GSAs should describe feasible, effective proposed projects and management actions that are commensurate with the level of understanding of groundwater conditions in the Subbasin and provide sufficient details for DWR staff to be able to clearly evaluate how the Plan’s projects and management actions will ensure achieving the sustainability goal in the Subbasin.” In responding to this Corrective Action, in the Revised July 2024 GSP, the Stanislaus & Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association (STRGBA) GSA and the County of Tuolumne GSA (Tuolumne GSA) committed to preparing management actions consisting of a Pumping Management Framework (including a groundwater allocation and pumping management program, groundwater extraction and surface water reporting program, groundwater extraction fee and groundwater pumping credit market and trading program), Demand Reduction Strategies (consisting of voluntary conservation and/or land use fallowing and conservation practices), and a Dry Well Mitigation Program. In response, this Groundwater Use Management Program (GWUMP or Program) was prepared, incorporating a pumping management framework and demand reduction strategies. A Dry Well Mitigation Program was prepared as a separate, stand-alone program.

While it is still the goal of the Subbasin GSA to first implement supply projects to reach basin sustainability, this GWUMP is a management action intended to respond to direction provided by DWR and outlines the demand management actions that will be taken as long as supply actions are not effective in meeting overall basin sustainability goals. Nothing in this framework is intended to be a determination of water rights and is not evidence for or against any claim of a water right that can be used in any adjudication of water rights.

1.2 Background

1.2.1 Modesto Subbasin
The Modesto Groundwater Subbasin (5-22.02) is a high-priority basin covering approximately 245,253 acres in the northern San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin. The Subbasin is bounded by the Stanislaus River on the north, the Tuolumne River on the south, the San Joaquin River on the west, and the crystalline basement rocks of the Sierra Nevada Foothills on the east. The Modesto Subbasin relies on two primary sources of water supply – surface water from the Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers and groundwater pumped from the principal aquifers described in the GSP. About 64 percent of the Modesto Subbasin is agricultural, with major crop types including almonds and other deciduous trees, corn, grains, pasture, vines, citrus and truck crops. Urban areas cover about 13 percent of the Subbasin. Remaining lands consist of non-agriculture, non-irrigated agriculture, undeveloped areas, and surface water (23 percent). Most of the undeveloped land is in the eastern portion of the Subbasin. A significant expansion of irrigated agriculture occurred in the Subbasin during the GSP study period. In 1996, irrigated agriculture covered approximately 46 percent of the Subbasin (approximately 111,946 acres). Over the next 20 years, irrigated agriculture expanded by about 40 percent, and by 2017 had added another 45,965 acres (totaling 157,911 acres, approximately 64 percent of the Subbasin). The increase in irrigated agriculture primarily resulted from a conversion of pasture and #17..
- 689 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 1-2 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 previously non-irrigated and undeveloped areas to deciduous/almond orchards. Much of this expansion occurred in the eastern portion of the Subbasin – outside of Modesto Irrigation District (MID) and Oakdale Irrigation District (OID) service areas – where groundwater is the primary source of water supply.

The GSP delineates four separate Management Areas (MAs) to reflect areas of similar water supplies, streamlining coordination of water management and prioritizing areas for GSP project implementation.

These management areas include the Modesto Management Area, Oakdale Management Area, NonDistrict East (NDE) Management Area, and Non-District West (NDW) Management Area as shown on Figure

1. FIGURE 1: MODESTO SUBBASIN MANAGEMENT AREAS
The Non-District West Management Area contains lands along the western rim of the Subbasin, where both groundwater and surface water are available for beneficial uses. The Non-District East Management Area includes lands outside of MID and OID service areas in the eastern portion of the Subbasin where groundwater is the primary water supply. The Modesto and Oakdale Management Areas coincide with the service area boundaries of their respective irrigation districts. MID manages Tuolumne River water and groundwater conjunctively, and OID manages Stanislaus River water and groundwater conjunctively. The Non-District East and Non-District West Management Areas cover remaining lands outside of MID and OID jurisdiction, where Stanislaus County is the lead member agency. #17..
- 690 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 1-3 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025

1.2.2 Determination Letter and Commitments
The Revised 2024 Modesto Subbasin GSP was approved by DWR in 2025 and is currently being implemented by the STRGBA GSA and the Tuolumne GSA. The goal of the GSP is to achieve sustainability by 2042 in compliance with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA).

As described in the Revised 2024 GSP, long-term declines in groundwater levels have occurred in the NDE Management Area and currently are impacting groundwater levels in the Oakdale Management Area. As a result, 2027 Interim Milestones (IMs) below the Minimum Threshold (MT) have been developed for representative monitoring wells in those management areas. The anticipated decline between adoption of the initial GSP in 2022 and 2027 (the first interim milestone) depends on future unknown hydrologic conditions. Since drought conditions began in Water Year (WY) 2013, dry hydrologic conditions have persisted in the Subbasin with five out of seven water years between WY 2014 and WY 2020 having been categorized as below normal, dry, or critically dry. Water level declines associated with the last seven years may continue if hydrologic conditions do not improve, and/or if the aquifer response to GSP project implementation is delayed or overestimated. To evaluate and prevent undesirable results, 2027 IMs have been developed for monitoring sites based on groundwater level declines observed over the last seven years. Based on modeling completed in support of the GSP, by 2032, projects and management actions are expected to support water level recovery; therefore, the 2032 IMs were set as the MT. If needed, the IMs for 2037 have been defined as the halfway point between the MT and the Measurable Objective (MO).

In general, there are two principal ways to reach the Subbasin IMs and ultimately achieve basin wide sustainability as the GSP is implemented:

1. Increase supply; or

2. Decrease demand; or
Reducing groundwater demand can be done through a variety of strategies, including changes to cropping patterns, land fallowing, land repurposing, and conservation in response to numeric groundwater allocations, which would be less than those currently extracted. Strategies to increase supply have been identified by the GSA and are included as projects in Chapter 8 of the Revised 2024 Subbasin GSP. These projects are proposed to either recharge groundwater with surface water or provide surface water to meet groundwater demand so that groundwater pumping is reduced without changing the land use or total water demand (in-lieu recharge). To date, the GSP has focused on implementing projects to address overdraft. However, the schedule of implementation, source, and timing of the funding, design, and construction of the supply projects poses uncertainties in terms of realizing the benefits in the expected timeline. Recognizing these uncertainties, the GSA acknowledges that more timely reductions in groundwater use will be required to meet the planned IMs. For this reason, the GSA has developed this GWUMP as a backstop to prevent significant and unreasonable impacts related to groundwater level decline.

The GWUMP, as outlined herein, is the first step in demand management. The GSAs may adjust the GWUMP as projects are implemented and further develop additional aspects of the overall Program as it is implemented and evolves.
#17..
- 691 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 2-1 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025

2. GROUNDWATER ALLOCATION FRAMEWORK
GSAs have the authority to develop and implement management actions within their GSPs that are based on local conditions, priorities, and management objectives. Under the California Water Code, a GSA has the authority to regulate, limit, or suspend groundwater extractions from individual wells or other facilities within a groundwater basin.0F
1 As a result, the STRGBA GSA has developed this Groundwater Allocation Framework which equitably distributes the sustainable yield amongst the Management Areas (Allocation Framework) to achieve groundwater sustainability consistent with SGMA. Any demand reductions actions must be approved by the STRGBA GSA and would be implemented by Management Area Stewards if authorized and directed by the STRGBA GSA.

This Allocation Framework is intended to be an adaptive program, modified over time to reflect changing hydrologic conditions and implementation of water supply projects. Nothing in this framework is intended to be a determination of water rights, and is not evidence for or against a water right that can be used in any adjudication of water rights.

2.1 Groundwater Allocation Framework
The STRGBA GSA developed a groundwater allocation framework based on the estimated sustainable yield of the Subbasin as documented in the GSP and considering developed supply and local groundwater use.

The goal of the framework is to equitably distribute the sustainable yield to each Management Area throughout the Subbasin and allow the Management Area Stewards to decide how to implement components of the framework in their respective management areas as needed to operate within those allocations.

As used herein, the Management Area Steward is defined as the GSA member agency/agencies from each Subbasin management area. The Modesto Subbasin Stewards are shown below in Table 1.

TABLE 1: MODESTO SUBBASIN STEWARDS
Management Area Stewards
Modesto Management Area
Modesto Irrigation District
City of Modesto
City of Waterford
Oakdale Management Area
Oakdale Irrigation District
City of Oakdale
Non-District West Management Area
Stanislaus County
City of Riverbank
Non-District East Management Area Stanislaus County
1 CWC § 10726.4(a)(2)
#17..
- 692 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 2-2 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 Overall, the process of developing the Allocation Framework included establishing the sustainable yield, accounting for special considerations of allocatable groundwater, determining the volume of developed water, allocating the sustainable yield of native groundwater, and establishing measures for management area stewardship by the GSA member agencies.

2.1.1 Sustainable Yield
Sustainable yield is defined under SGMA as “the maximum quantity of water, calculated over a base period representative of long-term conditions in the basin and including any temporary surplus, that can be withdrawn annually from a groundwater supply without causing an undesirable result.”1F 1 The sustainable
yield for the Modesto Subbasin was calculated to be 267,000 acre-feet per year (AFY). Sustainable yield for the Subbasin was calculated using a C2VSimTM numerical modeling scenario in which the long-term (50- year) sustainable management criteria are maintained. The development of sustainable yield incorporates the reduction of groundwater demand from net groundwater extractors, which forms the basis for the Allocation Framework. Additional information on the methodology utilized to determine the sustainable yield is presented in Section 5.3 of the Revised 2024 GSP.2F 2 While the sustainable yield provides the basis for the volume of allocatable water within the Subbasin, special considerations for certain entities were considered and incorporated into the Allocation Framework (see Section 2.1.2). The amount of water allocatable to applicable entities is termed “native sustainable yield”, which is discussed further in Section 2.1.3.

2.1.2 Special Considerations
Special considerations for the Allocation Framework were evaluated by the STRGBA GSA and included legal considerations and local management objectives. The following entities were determined to have limited requirements under the Allocation Framework:
• Federal & Tribal Lands (not present)
• Adjudicated Areas (not present)
• Developed Water Supplies
• De Minimis Water Users
• Municipal Water Use
Federal lands, tribal lands, and adjudicated areas are not present within the Subbasin. As a result, developed water, supplies for de minimis water users, and municipal water use were the only entities with special considerations or limitations under the Allocation Framework. Additional information on developed water supplies, de minimis water users, and municipal water users are discussed further herein. 1 CWC §10721(w))
2 Modesto Subbasin GSP, Revised July 2024, Section 5.3, pp. 303-310 #17..
- 693 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 2-3 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025

2.1.2.1 Developed Water Supply Users
Developed supplies are water that is intentionally sourced, imported and made available for use through human-made systems. California law recognizes imported water that is added to and withdrawn from an underground basin and credits this ‘developed water’ to the importer bringing the water into the basin.

California law also recognizes that a party who imports water into a basin or develops new supplies may retain rights to that water, including the right to recapture that water. As such, Developed Supply is controlled by the entity that developed the imported water supply.

Developed supply systems in the Modesto Subbasin include:
• Imported Water: Surface water brought into the basin from external sources, such as through canals, pipelines, or water transfers.
• Recycled Water: Wastewater or other non-traditional water sources that are treated to meet specific quality standards for reuse.
• Artificial Recharge Projects: Groundwater replenishment efforts using intentionally captured and injected water.

Recovery of imported and recycled water includes seepage resulting from storage, conveyance and/or land application. Recovery of water from artificial recharge projects correlates to the volume of water recharged by the project.

During the development of the Allocation Framework, estimates of developed supplies were refined into seepage from canals, reservoirs, drainage, and deep percolation of applied surface waters. Quantified values of developed water were sourced from MID’s and OID’s 2020 Agricultural Water Management Plans and are summarized below in Table 2.

TABLE 2: DEVELOPED SUPPLY IN THE MODESTO SUBBASIN
Developed Supply (AF) MID1 OID2
Deep Percolation of Applied Surface
Water 51,5003 14,8003
Canal and Reservoir Seepage 39,400 13,100
Drainage Seepage -- 3,700
Total 90,900 31,600
Notes:
1 Includes 2018 as a representative water year
2 Average value covering water years 2006-2019 3 estimated based on the fraction of applied surface water MID generates approximately 90,900 AFY of recharge from their developed supply, and OID generates approximately 31,600 AFY of recharge from their developed supply. These estimations were incorporated into the Allocation Framework and the Management Areas’ demand reduction targets, which are discussed #17..
- 694 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 2-4 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 further in Section 2.2.2 and Section 2.2.3. These values were estimated using the most recent data available and will be refined as the GWUMP is periodically re-evaluated.

2.1.2.2 De Minimis Water Users
De minimis extractors are classified as water users that extract two (2) acre-feet (AF) or less of groundwater per year.3F
1 De minimis water use totals approximately 13,800 AFY within the Subbasin. During the development of the Allocation Framework, the STRGBA GSA determined that de minimis extractors should be exempt from receiving allocations and reducing their groundwater use.

2.1.2.3 Municipal Water Users
Municipal water use refers to the provision of water for residential, commercial, and public services within a city. Municipal water users within the Subbasin include the City of Modesto, City of Oakdale, City of Riverbank, and the City of Waterford. These entities account for approximately 35,000 AFY of groundwater use. During development of the Allocation Framework, the STRGBA GSA designated municipal water users as a special case and limited their future groundwater use to their historical groundwater use. This decision was supported by several local and state requirements for implementing water use efficiency programs.

These requirements include:
• Making Conservation as a California Way of Life – a State regulation that establishes efficiency goals and Urban Water Use Objectives (UWUOs) for urban water suppliers to reduce municipal demands. The regulation requires urban water suppliers to determine their water use objectives and demonstrate compliance annually.4F
2 • Growth Obligations – Municipalities have State mandated housing and population growth targets that drive water demand.
• Public Service Constraints – Cities are non-profit entities that typically operate with limited flexibility in pricing for the purchase of water supplies. • Supply Limitations – Groundwater supplies are limited and meeting future demand will require surface water development, recharge projects, additional conservation, or purchased allocation credits.

Under this Allocation Framework, groundwater allocations are set at current groundwater use quantities per annum for municipalities, and the municipalities will be required to conserve water or provide other water supplies in order to supply future growth. If additional lands are annexed into municipal water provider’s service areas, those lands will be removed from the overlying allocation of the sustainable yield in future updates of the GWUMP, and the special case allocation to municipal water users will remain unchanged.
1 CWC § 10721(e)
2 23 CCR, § 966
#17..
- 695 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 2-5 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025

2.1.3 Allocation Framework Methodology
Multiple approaches to Subbasin groundwater allocation were considered by the STRGBA GSA to determine the best method for reducing groundwater demand to achieve the Subbasin’s sustainability goals. The approaches included allocations based on consumptive use (amount of water used and not returned to the Subbasin), pumping (total volume extracted), and other metrics such as crop type, economic value, or negotiated agreements. Ultimately, pumping, or the total volume of groundwater extracted by user, was selected as the basis for the Allocation Framework as it was both directly measurable and could easily be estimated by other means in cases where metering data were not available.

A proportional allocation by the overlying area, excluding those urban and domestic areas where the service area was provided a special consideration, was selected as the approach for distributing allocatable yield by management area within the Subbasin. This method was selected as it facilitates resource pooling in management areas that are more reliant on groundwater, eliminates the ‘double allocation’ of water to municipal and de minimis areas, and promotes equity across all overlying users, despite their intended use.

Following the selection of the Allocation Framework’s basis and distribution method, estimations of allocations for the Subbasin and each Management Area (as defined in the Revised 2024 GSP) were made.

As previously discussed, allocations are calculated by distributing the allocatable yield (i.e., non-special considerations) across the Subbasin’s overlying area, where:

𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 = 𝑆𝑆 − 𝐷𝐷 − 𝑀𝑀 − 𝐷𝐷
AY = Allocatable Yield
SY = Sustainable Yield
D = De minimis Users
M = Municipal Users
DS = Developed Supply
The allocatable yield calculated for the Modesto Subbasin was determined to be 95,700 AFY.

Overlying Allocation: The Subbasin-wide overlying allocation of 95,700 AFY was subsequently distributed amongst the Management Areas using a proportional allocation methodology based on each zone’s overlying land area minus the area covered by urban and domestic land uses (referred to herein as Overlying, Non-Urban Area). This equitable distribution approach ensures that water allocations correspond directly to the spatial extent of overlying land use within each Management Area without ‘double allocating’ water to urban and domestic land areas. The proportional distribution method calculates each Management Area's share by dividing its overlying non-urban acreage by the total subbasin overlying acreage, then multiplying this percentage by the total overlying allocation. An illustrative calculation demonstrating how individual Management Area overlying allocations are determined is presented below. #17..
- 696 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 2-6 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 = (𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑆𝑆)(
𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀
𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆
)
OVRMA = Overlying Allocation of the Management Area
OVRS = Overlying Allocation of the Subbasin
AreaMA = Overlying Non-Urban Area of the Management Area Areas = Total Area of the Subbasin
Table 3, below, summarizes the ‘baseline’ allocations for the individual management areas as calculated using the above methodology.

TABLE 3: BASELINE MODESTO SUBBASIN GROUNDWATER ALLOCATIONS Subbasin
TOTAL Modesto MA Oakdale MA
NDW
MA
NDE
MA
Developed Supply1 122,500 90,900 31,600 0 0
Special Cases1 48,800 33,700 8,900 6,200 0
Overlying Use1 95,700 35,300 23,200 5,500 31,700
Total Allocation1 267,000 159,900 63,700 11,700 31,700
Total Historical
Pumping1 317,600 173,000 39,800 15,100 89,700
Reduction Required1 50,600 13,100 -23,900 3,400 58,000
Total Allocation
(Percent of Historical) 84% 92% 160% 77% 35%
1 Volumes are presented in acre-feet.

NDW – Non-District West
NDE – Non-District East
The initial allocation estimations (“Baseline Allocations”) indicate an average annual reduction of Total Historical Pumping by approximately 16% is needed. However, allocations applied to certain management areas, such as the Oakdale Management Area, were greater because of OID’s development and use of surface water and thus appear in Table 3 as negative required reductions. To collaborate and assist in easing reductions in other Management Areas, and to allow supply projects to be constructed, OID has agreed to redistribute the portion of its developed supply that is not anticipated to be used by OID in the near term to other Management Areas on a temporary basis, not to exceed five years (2027-2031), at no cost to the beneficiaries. The reallocation option, referred to herein as ‘Collaborative Management, is presented below #17..
- 697 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 2-7 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 in Table 4. It is important to note that any potential ‘reallocation’ of the native sustainable yield would have to be agreed upon by the STRGBA GSA. However, reallocation of developed supply is controlled by the entity that developed the imported water supply. Any such redistribution of OID’s developed water is not a forfeiture of the right or claim of right in the future. Furthermore, by reallocating developed supply to another party under this Framework, the potential pumping reduction in other management areas is reduced from what it may have to be in the future. OID specifically hereby disclaims that by approving this Plan it waives any of its water rights and/or the rights of its landowners; but rather, affirms that it puts all water to which it or its landowners have a right to full beneficial use.

TABLE 4: COLLABORATIVE MANAGEMENT OF GROUNDWATER ALLOCATIONS Subbasin
TOTAL
Modesto
Management
Area
Oakdale
Management
Area
NDW
Management
Area
NDE
Management
Area
Base Allocation1 267,000 159,900 63,700 11,700 31,700
Historical Pumping1 317,600 173,000 39,800 15,100 89,700 Developed Water1 - 0 -23,900 0 0
Redistribution of
Developed Water1 0 11,700 -23,900 1,800 10,400
Allocation with
Redistribution of
Developed Water1
267,000 171,600 39,800 13,500 42,100
Reduction Required1,2 50,600 1,400 0 1,600 47,600
Allocation with
Redistribution2 (Percent
of Historical)
84% 99% 100% 89% 47%
1 Volumes are presented in acre-feet. 2Assumes long-term use of Redistributed Developed Water.

NDW – Non-District West
NDE – Non-District East
Long-term redistribution of developed water would result in smaller reduction targets for the Modesto, Non-District West, and Non-District East Management Areas - 7%, 12%, and 12%, respectively. However, OID has only agreed to allow temporary utilization of their developed water for the first five years of implementation (2027-2031).

The STRGBA GSA prepared an implementation schedule for meeting the allocation targets while allowing groundwater users the opportunity to adapt to reductions in groundwater use. The implementation schedules for the Management Areas are presented in Section 4. Distribution of these allocations to groundwater users will be completed by Management Area “Stewards”, as discussed in Section 2.1.4. #17..
- 698 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 2-8 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 However, it is important to keep in mind that this framework is one of the Subbasin’s first steps towards achieving groundwater sustainability, and this Program will continue to be reviewed and adjusted as needed in future updates.
#17..
- 699 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 3-9 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025

3. IMPLEMENTATION
Member agencies of the STRGBA GSA determined that the GWUMP would be best implemented locally in the individual Management Areas within the Subbasin. The Management Areas are defined in the Revised 2024 GSP as areas of similar water supplies and similar ongoing water management activities.5F 1 As discussed
in Section 2 and shown in Figure 1, four management areas are present within the Modesto Subbasin:

Modesto Management Area, Oakdale Management Area, Non-District West Management Area, and NonDistrict East Management Area. These management areas and their Stewards (agencies with jurisdiction) are shown in Table 1.

Following the adoption of this GWUMP, the Management Area Stewards will distribute allocations as credits to groundwater users no later than January 31, 2027, per the Revised 2024 Modesto Subbasin GSP. The total allocations, per Management Area, in the first five years of implementation will be consistent with the “Collaborative Management” allocation volumes presented in Table 4. Management Area Stewards will monitor and evaluate groundwater use and the assigned allocations on a regular basis to ensure groundwater users are operating within their assigned allocations. The STRGBA GSA will also continue to independently assess groundwater use in each management area as part of its annual reporting process and procedures.

The intent of localized management by the Management Area Steward is to achieve sustainable management criteria, such as interim milestones and measurable objectives, as established in the GSP and prevent the occurrence of undesirable results, but to do so in a fashion that is achievable within the characteristics of each individual area. Should groundwater data and parameters, such as groundwater levels, indicate that a particular management area is not achieving their sustainable management objectives, Management Area Stewards will develop a Management Area Action Plan for STRGBA GSA approval as a corrective course of action and may, at their discretion, escalate the allocation implementation schedule to comply with these sustainable management criteria if needed. Non-compliance with these criteria may trigger other additional management strategies. Figure 2 outlines the methodology the Management Area Stewards will follow in implementing the GWUMP. For the purposes of this GWUMP, non-compliance is defined as two (2) consecutive years of not meeting the GWUMP-mandated allocations and/or not having a GSA-approved Action Plan implemented within two (2) years. 1 Modesto Subbasin GSP, Revised July 2024, Section 6.2.3, p. 317 #17..
- 700 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 3-10 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 FIGURE 2: GWUMP RESPONSE LEVELS
If, based on the Subbasin’s monitoring program and annual analysis, it is determined that a Management Area Action Plan is required, the following steps will be implemented in developing that plan (Figure 3).

Should a Management Area move into Response Level 3 as a result of non-compliance, the STRGBA GSA would follow the State’s probationary emergency protocols/measures to meter groundwater extractions and assess fees while the GSA drafts and executes a GSA Action Plan for the Management Area(s) and returns the Management Area(s) to the planned path towards sustainability. #17..
- 701 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 3-11 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 FIGURE 3: MANAGEMENT AREA ACTION PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS The content of the Action Plan will vary depending on the Management Area, hydrologic condition, situation and other parameters, but in general, Actions Plans will include the following content (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4: ACTION PLAN CONTENT
Section 3.1 provides a list of potential adaptive management strategies that the Management Area Stewards may choose to implement to ensure the Subbasin progresses towards sustainability. In the event the Management Area Stewards are unable to progress towards sustainability (i.e., failure to achieve interim milestones or continuously exceeding minimum thresholds), the STRGBA GSA will implement additional measures to prevent the occurrence of undesirable results. #17..
- 702 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 3-12 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 While the GWUMP will be reassessed no less than once every five years (see Section 4 for further discussion), the condition of the Subbasin will be evaluated annually as part of the SGMA-mandated annual report process. If identified as part of that reporting process and as needed, the Management Area Stewards may opt to modify their Action Plan with STRGBA GSA approval between GWUMP assessments to proactively address any negative trends identified at that time. However, any planned regulation, limitation or suspensions of groundwater extractions from individual wells or other facilities by Management Area Stewards will require prior approval by the GSA.

3.1 Adaptive Management Strategies
While the groundwater allocation framework discussed above in Section 2 is intended to move the Subbasin towards sustainability, it is recognized that Subbasin hydrogeology and future hydrologic conditions will impact the success of the program. As the GWUMP is envisioned, the Management Area Stewards will be responsible for monitoring progress towards achieving the Interim Milestones set forth in the Revised 2024 GSP, and for implementing adaptive management strategies and responses as needed to achieve the desired results.

Adaptive management is a key component of the GWUMP. A program that is flexible and developed to adapt to changing conditions will be the most effective. The unknown factors in meeting the demand management goals may include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Hydrology of the next five years: The benefits (recharge) accrued from planned projects vary based on the availability of surface and storm water over the next few years. Projects that rely on excess surface water to be implemented may not produce the same level of benefits in drought years. • Implementation schedule of planned projects: It is unknown what legal, financial, or environmental hurdles could delay the implementation of the identified projects. These delays could be specific to a GSA, management area, or the Subbasin as a whole.
• Estimation of Project Contributions: Not all projects may be able, once implemented, to produce the anticipated benefits estimated during the planning process, even without project delays. • Model Uncertainty: Through future monitoring, the GSAs will be able to assess model uncertainty and improve model estimations as new data becomes available.

To aid the Management Area Stewards with adaptively managing their areas, the following is a list of some potential strategies that may be employed to help reduce groundwater use and support achieving the Subbasin Interim Milestones and ultimately groundwater basin sustainability. This list is not intended to be all inclusive.
• Implementation of voluntary or mandatory conservation measures including, but not limited to:
o Land repurposing to enhance groundwater recharge
o Land repurposing for habitat restoration (recreational use, GDE benefit, etc.) o Land repurposing for clean energy incentives (i.e., solar power fields) o Replacing higher value/water using crops with lower value/water using crops or replanting or repurposing with crops/agriculture requiring lower water demands o Fallowing – total or partial crop removal, rotational fallowing, dry farming #17..
- 703 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 3-13 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 • Acceleration of the allocation reduction schedule
• Implementation of groundwater extraction fees
• Increased groundwater use reporting requirements to quarterly or monthly • Prioritization of implementation of Supplemental Projects (Group 3) • Incentivization of surface water deliveries/in-lieu recharge • Implementation of targeted pumping reductions or restrictions • Reduction of allocations beyond base allocation limits • Restriction of pumping in areas where MTs have been exceeded • Required flowmeter installation on extraction wells
• Invasive species removal
• Urban retrofitting and/or irrigation improvements to reduce water loss and use It will be at the Management Area Stewards discretion and responsibility to effectively use some or all of these and potentially other measures to achieve the targeted groundwater use extractions and reach Interim Milestones, and it will be the responsibility of the STRGBA GSA to ensure there is consistency amongst the Management Areas with respect to implementation and application of adaptive management measures. #17..
- 704 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 4-1 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025

4. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
As previously described, in response to Recommended Corrective Action #2 of DWR’s 2025 Determination letter, the STRGBA GSA committed to developing this GWUMP by no later than January 31, 2026, and will implement the program beginning no later than January 31, 2027. To meet this schedule and achieve the Interim Milestones established in the Revised 2024 GSP, the GWUMP will be the primary tool to guide the Subbasin towards sustainability as additional projects and management actions are implemented to offset continued groundwater use.

This Program is the first step towards achieving long-term sustainability. It is designed to effectively manage groundwater use while allowing growers the flexibility to adapt to new policies and frameworks within the Subbasin. Ultimately, however, groundwater management will be driven by observed groundwater level data relative to the Minimum Thresholds and Interim Milestones established in the Revised 2024 GSP and will be supported through adaptive management. The timeline for achieving Interim Milestones, as set forth in the Revised 2024 GSP, is as follows:
2027 - Arrest overdraft and groundwater level decline
2032 - Raise groundwater levels to Minimum Thresholds
2037 - Raise groundwater levels to halfway between Minimum Thresholds and Measurable Objectives
2042 - Raise groundwater level to Measurable Objectives It is important to recognize that the allocations presented in this GWUMP are based on the best available data at this time. The STRGBA GSA will continue to gather data and refine the allocations presented herein in future updates to the GWUMP. However, even with the temporary redistribution of the OID developed water supply in the first five years of program implementation and considering historical groundwater level trends, the NDE Management Area will begin the GWUMP Phase 1 implementation period in the Phase 2 Response Level and therefore will require a Management Area Action Plan in addition to initiating reductions in groundwater use.

Following implementation of this GWUMP in January of 2027, reductions in groundwater extractions will ‘ramp up’ in five-year increments as necessary to arrest overdraft and raise groundwater levels to the Measurable Objectives identified in the GSP. Table 5, below is the implementation schedule for the NDE Management Area.
#17..
- 705 -
STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 4-2 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 TABLE 5: NDE MANAGEMENT AREA REDUCTION SCHEDULE
Year Percent Reduction of
Target Allocation
Required Reduction (AcreFeet)
2027-2030
34% of total reduction
required less 10,400 AF of
Redistributed Developed
Water
16,000
2030-2035 67% 39,000
2035-2040 100% 58,000
While some pumping reduction is indicated to be required in the Modesto Management Area, the reduction volume after redistribution of developed water in the first five-year implementation period is less than 1% of the Base Allocation and Historical Pumping. Additionally, groundwater levels in a majority of the monitoring wells in the MID and City of Modesto service areas are relatively stable. Continued assessment of data and groundwater/surface water operations in the Modesto Management Area is needed to ensure overdraft does not occur in the future; and no Action Plan is required in the Modesto Area at this time.

Although some reduction in groundwater pumping is indicated for the Non-District West Management Area in the first five-year implementation period, observed groundwater levels in a majority of the monitoring wells in the western upper and lower principal aquifers in the Management Area are currently at or above the measurable objective. Additionally, there are no indications of any long-term water level declines in the Non-District West Management Area, therefore, no Action Plan is required in the NonDistrict West Management Area at this time.

Even though OID’s development and use of surface water results in a surplus of developed supply, groundwater levels in the eastern portion of the Oakdale Management Area continue to decline due to the influence of overdraft in the Non-District East Management Area. No reductions or Action Plan are required for the eastern portion of the Oakdale Management Area at this time.

Per SGMA, every five years, the Subbasin GSP is re-evaluated and a Periodic Evaluation is prepared for submission to DWR. Evaluation of, and any necessary revisions to, the GWUMP will occur prior to and in parallel with each GSP review and Periodic Evaluation. Additionally, other related management actions and tools, such as the development of a groundwater banking and trading program, may be developed by the STRGBA GSA in the future to further support sustainable management of the Subbasin. Figure 5 below is the planned implementation and review schedule for the GWUMP. #17..
- 706 -

STRGBA GSA (0012848.00) 4-3 Woodard & Curran, Inc.

Draft Groundwater Use Management Program November 10, 2025 FIGURE 5: GWUMP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
#17..
- 707 -
woodardcurran.com
#17..
- 708 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

January 13, 2026
Date: November 25, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: William Wong, Director of Utilities
SUBJECT: Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding City of Modesto and Stanislaus County
South Modesto Area Strengthen and Replace Water Mains Project CONTACT: David A. Felix, Associate Engineer, [email protected], 209-577-5488 DESCRIPTION:

Consider approving an Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding with Stanislaus County for the South Modesto Area Strengthen and Replace Water Mains Project in an amount not to exceed $15,869,000 and rescinding Resolution No. 2024-120. (Funding Source: Water Fund)
STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

The recommended action supports the 2025-2026 City’s Strategic Plan Initiatives, Goal D:

Provide safe, efficient, and reliable infrastructure through proactive community investment, maintenance, and sustainability efforts.

BACKGROUND:

The South Modesto Area Strengthen and Replace Water Mains Project is comprised of two neighborhoods, Bret Harte and Parklawn. The old undersized water mains in these neighborhoods are prone to leaks and will be replaced with new City standard water mains, valves, fittings, service laterals, and fire hydrants to improve system reliability, flows and pressures.

Stanislaus County (County) will also be improving existing infrastructure in the Bret Harte and Parklawn neighborhoods, referred to as County Areas 10 and 24, respectively, with funding received from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). Improvements will include new sidewalks, curb and gutter, lighting, and storm drainage. Due to ARPA’s deadline of Winter 2026 for the expenditure of funds, the County and City Projects were finalized and bid in Fall 2025.
#18..
- 709 -
City Council, January 13, 2026
Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding
City of Modesto and Stanislaus County
South Modesto Area Strengthen and Replace Water Mains Project

DISCUSSION:

To increase efficiency, minimize disruption, and ensure both City and County Projects are completed on time and compatible during construction, the City and County agreed to collaborate on the design and construction efforts in the Parklawn and Bret Harte neighborhoods.

On April 9, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-120, Council approved entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Stanislaus County for the South Modesto Area Strength and Replace Water Mains Project in amount not to exceed $12,850,000.

Partnering with the County on this effort has allowed the City to avoid the lengthy process of hiring an outside engineering consultant for the design of the City’s water system improvements.

The MOU stipulates the roles and responsibilities of each party for the design and construction of the Project.

With the City’s oversight, the County finalized construction documents in the Summer of 2025 and bid both County and City improvements in the Fall of 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Expenses associated with this effort will be housed in the following Capital Improvement Program Project:
101512 - S. Modesto Areas S&R WMs – Ph 1

ANTICIPATED PROJECT EXPENDITURES
2025 2024
Final Estimate
Engineering Design $1,141,000 $1,140,413
Additional Services $114,041
Construction $12,250,000 $10,486,860
Contingency $1,225,000 $1,048,686
Construction Administration $1,253,000
Engineering/Design/Administration – County Staff $60,000 Subtotal – MOU Related Expenses $15,869,000 $12,850,000 Engineering/Design/Administration - City Staff $140,000 $140,000 Construction Administration - City Staff $1,000,000 $1,000,000 City Construction Forces $50,000 $50,000
Project Total $17,059,000 $14,040,000
#18..
- 710 -
City Council, January 13, 2026
Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding
City of Modesto and Stanislaus County
South Modesto Area Strengthen and Replace Water Mains Project

This Amended and Restated MOU supersedes the MOU approved by Council on April 9, 2024, rescinds Resolution 2024-120, and replaces costs estimates previously presented with final verified costs.

A budget adjustment in the amount of $3,019,000 from Water Fund Reserves will be necessary to fund the South Modesto Area Strengthen and Replace Water Mains Project.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
On April 9, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-120, Council approved entering into the Original MOU with Stanislaus County; Consideration of the Amended and Restated MOU was not considered by a Committee.

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

A Notice of Exemption was filed with Stanislaus County on March 26, 2025, under Article 19 – Categorical Sections 15301 Class 1 (b)(c); 15303 (d).

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution approving an Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding with Stanislaus County for the South Modesto Area Strengthen and Replace Water Mains Project, in an amount not to exceed $15,869,000, rescinding Resolution No. 2024-120, and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Agreement.

Resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program Budget in the amount of $3,019,000 to be transferred into the Project from Water Fund Reserves to fund the South Modesto Area Strengthen and Replace Water Mains Project and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to implement the provisions of the Resolution.

Approved by:

William Wong, Director of Utilities
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolutions (2)

2. Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding

3. Resolution 2024-098

4. Resolution 2024-120
#18..
- 711 -
01/13/2026/Utilities/DFelix/Item X 1 2026-XX

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDED AND RESTATED

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH STANISLAUS COUNTY FOR

THE SOUTH MODESTO AREA STRENGTHEN AND REPLACE WATER
MAINS PROJECT, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $15,869,000,
RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2024-120, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the South Modesto Area Strengthen & Replace Water Mains Project is comprised of two neighborhoods, Bret Harte and Parklawn, and WHEREAS, the old undersized water mains in these neighborhoods are prone to leaks and will be replaced with new City standard water mains, valves, fittings, service laterals, and fire hydrants to improve system reliability, flows and pressures, and WHEREAS, Stanislaus County (County) will also be improving existing infrastructure in the Bret Harte and Parklawn neighborhoods, referred to as County Areas 10 and 24, respectively, with funding received from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), and
WHEREAS, due to ARPA’s deadline of the Winter of 2026 for the expenditure of funds, the County and City Projects were finalized and bid in Fall of 2025, and WHEREAS, to increase efficiency, minimize disruption, and ensure both City and County Projects are completed on time and compatible during construction, the City and County agreed to collaborate on the design and construction efforts in the Parklawn and Bret Harte neighborhoods, and
WHEREAS, on April 9, 2024, by Resolution No. 2024-120, Council approved entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Stanislaus County for the #18..
- 712 -
01/13/2026/Utilities/DFelix/Item X 2 2026-XX
South Modesto Area Strength and Replace Water Mains Project in amount not to exceed $12,850,000; and
WHEREAS, partnering with the County on this effort has allowed the City to avoid the lengthy process of hiring an outside engineering consultant for the design of the City’s water system improvements; and
WHEREAS, the MOU stipulates the roles and responsibilities of each party for the design and construction of the Project; and
WHEREAS, with the City’s oversight, the County finalized construction documents in the Summer of 2025 and bid both County and City improvements in the Fall of 2025; and
WHEREAS, the Amended and Restated MOU supersedes the MOU approved by Council on April 9, 2024, rescinds Resolution 2024-120, and replaces costs estimates previously presented with final verified costs.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby approves an Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding with Stanislaus County for the South Modesto Area Strengthen and Replace Water Mains Project, in an amount not to exceed $15,869,00 and rescinds Resolution 2024-120.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney. #18..
- 713 -
01/13/2026/Utilities/DFelix/Item X 3 2026-XX
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 13th day of January 2026, by Councilmember _______________, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember _______________, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

DIANA NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC
City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ____________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#18..
- 714 -
01/13/2026/Utilities/DFelix/Item X 1 2026-XX

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,019,000 TO

BE TRANSFERRED INTO THE PROJECT FROM WATER FUND RESERVES

TO FUND THE SOUTH MODESTO AREA STRENGTHEN AND REPLACE

WATER MAINS PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR

HIS DESIGNEE, TO IMPLEMENT THE PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, certain budgetary transactions are necessary in the amount of $3,019,000, in order to fund the South Modesto Area Strengthen and Replace Water Mains Project; and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program Budget must be amended.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby approves the amendment of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program Budget in the amount of $3,019,000.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to implement the provisions of this resolution. #18..
- 715 -
01/13/2026/Utilities/DFelix/Item X 2 2026-XX
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 13th day of January 2026, by Councilmember _______________, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember _______________, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

DIANA NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC
City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ____________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#18..
- 716 -
#18..
- 717 -
#18..
- 718 -
#18..
- 719 -
#18..
- 720 -
#18..
- 721 -
#18..
- 722 -
#18..
- 723 -
#18..
- 724 -
#18..
- 725 -
#18..
- 726 -
#18..
- 727 -
#18..
- 728 -
#18..
- 729 -
#18..
- 730 -
#18..
- 731 -
#18..
- 732 -
#18..
- 733 -
#18..
- 734 -
#18..
- 735 -
#18..
- 736 -
#18..
- 737 -
#18..
- 738 -
#18..
- 739 -
#18..
- 740 -
#18..
- 741 -
#18..
- 742 -
#18..
- 743 -
#18..
- 744 -
#18..
- 745 -
#18..
- 746 -
#18..
- 747 -
#18..
- 748 -
#18..
- 749 -
#18..
- 750 -
#18..
- 751 -
#18..
- 752 -
#18..
- 753 -
#18..
- 754 -

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

January 13, 2026
Date: December 18, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: William Wong, Director of Utilities
SUBJECT: First Amendment for the Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites CONTACT: Jeff Daniels, Wastewater Division Manager, [email protected], 209-577-6255
DESCRIPTION:

Consider approving the First Amendment with HB Restoration Inc., Rio Linda, CA, for the Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites increasing the Agreement amount by $868,453 for a new total amount of $1,537,529. (Funding Source: Sewer Operations Fund) STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

This item supports the City of Modesto 2025-2026 Strategic Plan Initiatives, Goal D: Provide safe, efficient, and reliable infrastructure through proactive community investment, maintenance, and sustainability efforts.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Modesto, Water Services Division, operates and maintains one hundred and two (102) water well sites and thirteen (13) storage tank sites located in and around Modesto, Salida, Turlock, Grayson, Del Rio, Ceres, and Empire. The Water Division’s painting program identifies and prioritizes the painting of well and tank sites, estimating six (6) well sites and one (1) tank site for each contract year.

Tank sites are typically painted every five (5) to ten (10) years with an estimated annual cost of $82,000. Services could include painting tanks, control rooms, electrical cabinets, conduit, motors, water pipelines and appurtenances. All surfaces are pressured washed, paint scraped when needed, spot primed and painted.

On October 8, 2024, by Resolution 2024-377, Council authorized an Agreement for the Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites to HB Restoration Inc., Rio Linda, CA, for two-years (2) with three (3) one-year (1) extensions options at the sole discretion of the City, for an estimated annual amount of $126,000 and a total amount not to exceed $669,076 over five (5) years. #19..
- 755 -
City Council, January 13, 2026
First Amendment for the Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites

DISCUSSION:

The Wastewater Division is responsible for maintaining the City’s assets at the City of Modesto Regional Water Recycling Facility – Sutter Campus and Jennings Campus, including various pump station sites throughout the City. These assets are routinely exposed to highly corrosive environments due to the presence of hydrogen sulfide generated by sewer contents.

Wastewater staff determined it was necessary to begin a regularly scheduled maintenance program for the painting of various assets considered at risk of breakdown due to the corrosive environments where they are housed. The pricing and services Wastewater is now requesting were captured as part of the scope of the Informal Invitation for Bids that was solicited for the Water Division but due to the number of facilities and structures that required sites visits for more accurate estimates the quotes for Wastewater weren’t received until much later, after the Agreement was put in place for the Water Division. The Wastewater Division is requesting the same services utilized by the Water Division. The original Agreement amount included pricing for hourly rates for painters and the cost for paint for the painting of the Water Division’s water wells and Tank sites.

The Wastewater Division would like to increase the existing agreement in order to include the painting of the City’s Wastewater assets, which include Wastewater structures, tanks, backflows, pumping stations, aboveground pipes and safety railings by an estimated $200,000 a year, for a total not to exceed $1,537,529 over five (5) years for the work needed for both Wastewater and Water Division.

Modesto Municipal Code (MMC) Section 8-3.203 generally requires all purchases, which meet or exceed $100,000 for material, equipment, or contractual services to be formally bid.

However, exceptions to the formal bidding process are granted in MMC 8-3.204(f) “Where the Purchasing Manager, in his or her discretion, determines that it is appropriate to amend the services or goods provided under an existing agreement to include additional similar goods or services, or limited quantity or scope, in order to increase efficiency and avoid delays or disruption to City projects or services” This service is essential in preserving the integrity of the City’s Wastewater assets. The paint serves as a protective barrier, shielding assets from external corrosion and breakdown and extends the life of assets through regularly scheduled maintenance.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The increase in the estimated annual amount of $200,000 will be absorbed within the current Utilities Department, Wastewater Division FY 2025-26 operating budget and ongoing annual costs will be included as part of the adopted budget, accounting string: 4210-44313-53150.

Expenditures for the previous five-year agreement for painting of water wells and tank sites are listed below:

Contract Year Expended
YR 1 (10/08/19 – 10/07/20) $ -
YR 2 (10/08/20 – 10/07/21) $ 80,346
YR 3 (10/08/21 – 10/07/22) $ 85,790
YR 4 (10/08/22 – 10/07/23) $ 77,416
YR 5 (10/08/23 - YTD) $ 84,319
TOTAL $ 327,871
AVERAGE $ 81,968
#19..
- 756 -
City Council, January 13, 2026
First Amendment for the Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites

The most recent bid submittal for the Water Division included a 40% price increase that was calculated into the original request to provide a new base request total. Contract years 3-5 included a 5% Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase to cover any negotiated requests that may be submitted to the Purchasing Division. The overall agreement total was calculated by forecasting CPI percentage increases based on an average of the CPI index over the last twelve (12) months. City Staff project annual increases based on this estimated forecast. Annual increases will be calculated using the CPI index at the time of the requested increase.

ANTICIPATED AGREEMENT EXPENDITURES:

CY 1 CY2 CY3 CY4 CY5
Water Base Request Total $ 126,000 $ 126,000 $ 126,000 $ 132,300 $ 138,915 5% CPI Increase $ 6,300 $ 6,615 $ 6,946
Wastewater Base Request Total $ 0 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 211,000 $ 222,605

5.5% CPI Increase $ 11,000 $ 11,605 $ 12,243
New Contract Year Totals $ 126,000 $ 326,000 $ 343,300 $ 361,520 $ 380,709 New 5 Year Contract Total $ 1,537,529
Water agreement total was calculated with a 5% CPI increase, while Wastewater’s agreement is calculated with a 5.5% CPI increase. The difference is due to the different time frame of Wastewater joining the agreement.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

This item was presented to the Finance Committee on December 17, 2025, and the Committee recommended forwarding this item to Council for approval.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution approving the First Amendment with HB Restoration Inc., Rio Linda for the Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites, increasing the Agreement amount by $868,453 for a new estimated annual amount of $326,000, and a new total amount of $1,537,529 through the term of the agreement and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Amendment.

Approved by:

William Wong, Director of Utilities
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolution

2. First Amendment – HB Restoration

3. HB Restoration Original Agreement

4. CA Levine Act Disclosure Form

5. Exhibit B
#19..
- 757 -
1 2026-XX

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT WITH HB
RESTORATION INC., RIO LINDA FOR THE PAINTING OF WATER WELLS AND TANK SITES, INCREASING THE AGREEMENT AMOUNT BY $868,453 FOR A NEW ESTIMATED ANNUAL AMOUNT OF $326,000, AND A NEW TOTAL AMOUNT OF $1,537,529 THROUGH THE TERM OF THE

AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS

DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, the Wastewater Division is responsible for maintaining the City’s assets at the City of Modesto Regional Water Recycling Facility – Sutter Campus and Jennings Campus, including various pump station sites throughout the City; and WHEREAS, Wastewater staff determined it was necessary to begin a regularly scheduled maintenance program for the painting of various assets considered at risk of breakdown due to the corrosive environments where they are housed; and WHEREAS, the pricing and services Wastewater is requesting were captured as part of the scope of the IFB that was solicited for the Water Division but due to the number of facilities and structures that required sites visits the quotes for Wastewater weren’t received until much later; and
WHEREAS, the Wastewater Division is requesting the same services utilized by the Water Division. The original Agreement amount included pricing for hourly rates for painters and the cost for paint for the painting of the Water Division’s water wells and Tank sites; and
WHEREAS, on October 8, 2024, by Resolution 2024-377, Council authorized an Agreement for the Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites to HB Restoration Inc., Rio Linda, CA, for two-years (2) with three (3) one-year (1) extensions options at the sole #19..
- 758 -
2 2026-XX
discretion of the City, for an estimated annual amount of $126,000 and a total amount not to exceed $669,076 over five (5) years; and
WHEREAS, the Wastewater Division would like to increase the existing agreement in order to include the painting of the City’s Wastewater assets, which include Wastewater structures, tanks, backflows, pumping stations, aboveground pipes and safety railings by an estimated $200,000 a year, for a total not to exceed $1,537,529 over five (5) years for the work needed for both Wastewater and Water Division; and WHEREAS, Modesto Municipal Code (MMC) Section 8-3.203 generally requires all purchases, which meet or exceed $100,000 for material, equipment, or contractual services to be formally bid. However, exceptions to the formal bidding process are granted in MMC 8-3.204(f) “Where the Purchasing Manager, in his or her discretion, determines that it is appropriate to amend the services or goods provided under an existing agreement to include additional similar goods or services, or limited quantity or scope, in order to increase efficiency and avoid delays or disruption to City projects or services” This service is essential in preserving the integrity of the City’s Wastewater assets.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby approves approving the First Amendment with HB Restoration Inc., Rio Linda for the Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites, increasing the Agreement amount by $868,453, for a new estimated annual amount of $326,000, and a new total amount of $1,537,529, through the term of the Agreement.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute the Amendment in a form approved by the City Attorney. #19..
- 759 -
3 2026-XX
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 13th day of January, 2026, by Councilmember ?, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember ?, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST: _____________________________________
DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ____________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#19..
- 760 -

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT

WITH HB RESTORATION FOR PAINTING OF WATER WELLS AND TANK SITES This FIRST AMENDMENT to the Agreement for Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites (“FIRST AMENDMENT”) is entered into between the CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter the “City”) and HB Restoration, a California Corporation (hereinafter “Contractor”) as of _________________, 2026.

RECITALS
This FIRST AMENDMENT for Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites is made with regard to the following recitals:

WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR previously entered into an Agreement for Painting of Water Wells and Tank Sites on the 8th day of October 2024 (the “Original Agreement”), and
WHEREAS, CITY and CONTRACTOR desire to amend the Original Agreement to increase compensation by $200,000 annually from an estimated annual amount of $126,000 to a new estimated annual amount of $326,000 and a new total amount not to exceed of $1,537,529.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of this FIRST AMENDMENT, and the mutual promises, covenants, and stipulations contained in the Original Agreement and this FIRST AMENDMENT, the parties agree as follows:

1. THE WORK, Section e, paragraph 1, of the Original Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety with the following:
“CONTRACTOR shall furnish said services at the following AGREEMENT rates for an estimated annual amount $326,000. The total amount paid by CITY to CONTRACTOR over the full term of the AGREEMENT shall not #19..
- 761 -
exceed $1,537,529. Unless the services provided are for a lump sum or flat fee, fees for work performed by CONTRACTOR on an hourly basis shall not exceed the amounts shown on Bid attached hereto as Exhibit B.”

2. Except as modified and amended by this FIRST AMENDMENT, all other provisions of the Original Agreement, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Modesto, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this FIRST AMENDMENT to Agreement for Consultant Services by its City Manager and attestation by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. 2026- _____ on the ________ day of ___________, 2026, and HB Restoration has caused this First Amendment to be duly executed as of the Effective Date. #19..
- 762 -

 



 




 





!"#$$%$&'(
$#$&!)'$#*!++$,-./00102
(%!,$!&,$&'$#$,&'3&'
$4'53)13,$ '3(
6'!'$3)4!+)3#&!('
7777777777,!53)77777777777777777777(898:(;5!&,;$'<$$&'
$4'53)13,$ '3(
!%=&*>!+*3#>3#!'3&3)'
$6'!'$3)4!+)3#&!(
$#$&!)'$#*!++$,4?
@(!&,AB/$ '3#!'3&?&*C(!4!+)3#&!
*3#>3#!'3&(
$#$&!)'$#*!++$,4D2
/-4
D/C
E?
2060
AF
EA0/0-6('
$13,$ '34'543=&*+!,3>'$,/$ 3+='3&23C898:G777777!='
3#H&"'
$
-<!#,3)B,!&,!"#$$%$&')3#I-?2
?2.DJE-
0/E0KK6-2L
-2M6?
06'34D2
/-4
D/(
NOONPQRSQRTROUNVWXQYZYO[\]N^S_NSRN`NTOQRTRUabN^S EA0/0-6(' $4D2
/-4
D/>#3c,$,!#$ >3& c$!&,#$ >3& ;+$ =;%''!+'
!';$ '
_RROVOQRdefg^RRSVbNOONPQRSQRTROUNVWXQYZYO[h]N^S_NSRN`NTOQRTRUabN^S ijklmnopqprstjusviwxyz{|{{}~z{~€i{~z|y~y€zyy‚ƒ€|x}x „
†‡ˆ‰Š
‹ŒŒ
†Ž
#19..
- 763 -







 








  !"

#$

%&'&()*+,--,./01/020-3,456/787-9:;,<1=,10, >?@ABC@CDEFBC@CGH?EAC@I?JJCKLMNOP 

Q 



R RS


TU
VP"U
W



R
$

XRQ
 
R
 #



YZ[\]^Z_`Z`_`[[^]abcd`]ec]f^Zg_cfdh`b`bi`]`j\Y]`gkc]l^[[d`_YeY`gYZmniYoYbpqrs^ZgYZ[b]Y_b ###
T

# 

#Q


tP
$W


Q



Tu#
Q



$S

Tuu

R



# 
 

 
# 


Q

  v
P

#W


 QQ
R#
T




R 


tP
W


 

$R
#




R 


tP

W



R

v#


T
t


 
RR wV&xyyyP

 R Q$S

 

v


R



t

z#

wxx+y{xP|



v#
Qv


RQR






TuQ


$S


RS$

z#



R 
T% #




z
$ %P

}~€‚ƒ„
„†‡ˆ~‰‡Š}‹ŒŽ‘’“Ž“’”“}’Ž•’”Ž–—”Œ‘Œ #19..
- 764 -
 

 

 

 










 

!
"
#$
#%

 $
#% & ' ()* * 

!
+


$
#%

 $
#% & ),(*' , 

!-

.
/0$#/%$
#%

 $
#% & ),(*'   
' 
!#
+
# 
 ## &*1(22 3 
!/

 ## &'1(22 1 
!$"4/4
 
 ## &'1(22 ) 
!%4

5

0


 ## &*1(22 
6


 









)7
 
8

 &*9322(22 
*( :
7 -8;

/
<
4
#7=
/
8

 )) 9



4##%##<.
9
/4##




=

%##
4 <.
9
""
/
"
4 
+
/
=
/ >?@ABACDEFGHCIJKKC@LGC@JMJGJNLIONJPLAIAGMNLCJHQ /
<"
<.#4


4 
##
%<44
4 
+
/
=
/>?@ABACDEF

=


/9/
#

4
4 "

#
+#"



/
<"
4#/%/+


<.+/
/
4 
#7=
/
(
/

<
4
#7=
/
8

 )),(*9
4 

%4=

/
4 "

#
+#"<"

4 ##
% <44
4 
+
/
=
/54=


=


/
4

%
<.

/
/
=


=#4
/=%
4 8



#




/

#
#
9+7=8


/

49
LRHOSHQT@AR@AKHGQAIJAGC@JEUVWXKYZNR@LKAGM[JOLNC\JGCLG]K@LII= /
+#=#

6 
(





#%<
4###=#
#</
"
#

4
#%
<"


/


4 
+

/
=
/>?@ABACDEF^AGRIZ]AGMC@HKJKJCQHNC@AG_LBHNEH]JKJRCAHG`aabcdefcg(/ 4 
hi(

 j


k;*2*'23,3',, 
,(

 8
:;
lmnopqrstsuvwmxvylz{|}~~~€‚}~‚ƒ‚l~}„||ƒ}||
†ƒ{€{ #19..
- 765 -
 














 
 

!
"



#

$%&

'()%
 )*

'

)
+


 

!,,"!-

% 

$%&

'()% * 







* .&
)%%

*
)*

'


)/)




0 %


)/1 2)*

'

 )
 &/ / %

) & &


 %
*&/

*%

(*

'
/
)

)

 #



 
*
#//)

#1 


)*

'

*
3455+56

&#
*
/+&

 )*

'7

(
-(635556385
63 


7%

(.
2
5
9 ,
",
-

*# (
)(9,$'%
()% !(5+:3455+56
*
 %/
*3455+56
*
#/
 &/
1


1
*
* ;
"

<






*
&
) 

//



/
/!

(

9:# 
9

!
* '*=


;9



:# 
9

* '*=


;9

,

;:# 
9

,
* '*=


;9

>

-:# 
9

>
* '*=


;9


!:# 
9

* '*=


;9

;

 )
'


/
*
)

9((
#
*
 %

/ %/
*/

1


/
*3455+56(
 )
) 

/


#
0

3455+56

/1
'
*
)
&

*



<)&
* )

')*

'

*

%  )
&</ ?

 #

3 



3455+56 


&
*
#
'


&
* '*
* )*

'7

(0

/  )
) 


*
#
#%

&#
@ABCDEFGHGIJKALJM@NOPQRSRRTUVQRVUWV@RUQXSPUPWQPPYZWSOTO #19.. - 766 -
 



  




 
 





 ! 
"


#




"$

%
&%'()('(*(+, -







.  /
 



/





  
 #

 
 ##/ 
#  
+





 




 #
# 
 #


(*/"
$
"



0

(*%
#
#


#













1


# #


 
/


#
 

# 
#
/

"

 


0! 



(*
2(+


( 
 #2


/












 
 #

#%
% 

'"

3 
 #

/ //
/


"


##

 #
45


"
 6
 


/
%(
//
#
 

'"

( 
 #




/


 







/




 






/









6#
7 #
 



 






/


"

#

$
##

 #
/
% 
 #

 #
 
#


#


 
 #





#


  #


#




/



-
/ 

 8
"


/#

#

8  
#

#

 "#

#

8
#
 #/



 8 7



 

"

%
"%
/"
'"

3 
 #

/ //
/


"


##

 #
45


"
 6
 


/
 

 


 





 
"

% 
 #

#

 

/"


"
 6
 


/
%
#%9
0
:/ 
 3 #/
 #







+






/

:

"



/ //
/


"


45
##


"
 6

%
(

 
/ 

#

" 

#



(*


/
"
 #


#/ 
#
#

" 

#



(*



/

"
  

;<=>?@ABCBDEF<GEH;IJKLMNMMOPQLMQPRQ;MPLSNKPKRLKKTURNJOJ #19.. - 767 -




 


  










 


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
IJKLMNOKNPQRMSTKUPVWXMUXUPYNKNPJVZZV[NKKWM\VX]KVZZNX[JWPM^PY_NM[VWXMUV[VXUPWWJKR`Iab XWPV[KUWPbM^^XcKNPbKSTZMdKKPbVUe]MZYUWKKNP^MNZMPPKPVNXPXU[^NMS\MNOTKN^MNSKe_dRfgIhiRIfh ^MNWJKR`Iaj
klmk 
n o 


 



 

*5 %5%8-5-.%/=2>p5.*++#(8+,$%(!5%8#*++#7#-*-#!(5-!8!"% *D% !"#$%$-!*$$#-#!(*+#(5, %$p*($6

5.*++9%+*8%$@#-.#(5, % q5r@#-.*88%-*9+%s%5-H  
mtuv



  
<*(*D% &
A! *(?8+*#75 %+*-%$-!-.#54:3;;<;12
klmk 

 


#(5, *(8%*5 %5%8-5/=2>6#-5!))#8% 56!))#8#*+56%7+!?%%56*($"!+,(-%% 5&4(?#(5, *(8%! 5%+)w#(5, *(8% 7*#(-*#(%$9?/=2>6#-5!))#8% 56!))#8#*+56%7+!?%%56! "!+,(-%% 55.*++9%%E8%55!) klmk 
#(5, *(8%*($5.*++(!-8!(- #9,-%@#-.#-&
x&y4><;12z

/01234/2035.*++#("!#8%/=2>(!-+%55-.*(!(8%% 7!(-.9*5%$!(-.%8!5-)! 5% "#8%5 % )! 7%$*($ %#79, 5*9+%8!5-5#(8, %$ #! -!-.%#("!#8%$*-%&4++#("!#8%55.*++9%*#$#(),++-.%)!++!@#(D *?7%(--% 75@#-.#(-.# -?$*?5*)-% 8!7+%-#!(*($*88%-*(8%!)-.%{% "#8%59?-.%/=2>6*($ %8%#-!)* |}~€‚ƒ„ƒ
†‡}ˆ†‰|Š‹ŒŽŽŽ‘’Ž’‘“’|Ž‘”Œ‘Œ“ŒŒ•–“‹‹ #19..
- 768 -
 












!

"

#


#$ %"

"






&"


#

"

"!




'
#( 

 
'




)&
 )!!*"+,  ( 
-.. %

' )


/
 
0
!












#

0'
1

2%%(%

&,3-4, 1 

5





 


1*


0
 
16



   
  17



"
 



"

3!%('

 

0

##


##












#



 #





#
0










&




8 0


 
0
#








0&



 

8 


0#





0

&



"


# #

#
8










0

 



#

0
0









#

0

##



##










0


0#


#

&
0







9:;<<=<>?@AB>?;9A?B;CDEFGHIJKHELKEMNONLMPHLMNQLHORPJLMSEGMKSNAT?UPHKDJINLKDPEOOHVHJGDP ##














#

0




 


 &
 W







2%%(%#









#



!
X!Y%7%Z2Y%2[\'
]^_`abcdedfgh^igj]klmnopooqrsnosrts]ornupmrmtnmmvwtplql #19.. - 769 -
 



 

 




 

 


 










 








 
!



"
#
" 

 
#
$

" 
%


#
%


# 





 











 


 
 

 
&
 &
" # 


&






 &







'
(')**+,-./012..03
4  





 
 




  

  


 







 

 





566789:;<1=::<>95??>6>796759;76@:88:A>:=67B@>C@6@56D586;E5;F::96>6A:?G*@:C7H86E5;<:6<HC@=::<>9   

 
   

 
'
IJ'#K#%#KLM4KKNOPKQR
&S 


 

  



 

 
 

R
L


 



#4T

S   U 
 !
U
'

'VJVWXYYYYYYYU

'#K#KZ




 U
'4NZ'V[VWX\(
']79685C6781<]>6;7=^7?:<67FH<>9:<<A>C:9<:
II'44KKN"4#"R
_`abcdefcgdhgai`hejkfl4
 







 
 







 

 


&


 
 
X
mnopqrstutvwxnywzm{|}~€‚ƒ~ƒ‚„ƒm‚~
€}‚}„~}}†‡„€||
ˆ‰‰
#19..
- 770 -
 






 







 



 

 





 



 



 



















 

 




 








! "#




$%&'()*+(,)
-.
/(+.
0,&
/,)1%)(%)2%3
#
4 







! "#


4 5
 




















 






6,7+8$%&'()*+(,)
6&,2%9:&%

;
 






















4<"#
4#<
3



4



=


 


























  







 




 












>



#




  
? 

 







@ AB4 @




>

B

 








4B#C















  







4B#C







4B#C


D








 





















 




D

 D


4<"#
4#<


  

 








@ AB4 @




=

 





D>



E
D




=
D



4B#C
















 










D

 


4<"#
4#<






FGHIJKLM

NMOPQGRP
SFT
UVWXYXXZ[\WX\[]\FX[W^YV[V]WVV_`]YUZU #19..
- 771 -


























 !











 







 "





#



#

#


#

 !












$



#








 !

%



 !&


'( ) ' 


















"
 !

#






*+,-./*-+.01234536789:;.<=*;:>
*+,-./*-+.?6@9417A6@1A6@AB499178A7*=-CDAEFG6*=-C0113H9 






#'( ) '




'( ) '&
 






#'( ) '














 






$



 '( ) '







   !#'( ) '


#





































#





'( ) '










 










)IJ( 









K





#

































)IJ( 













# 









"

#

'( ) '

























LMNOPQRSTSUVWMXVYLZ[\]^_^^`ab]^bacbL^a]d_\a\c]\\efc_[`[ #19.. - 772 -













!"#$

%
&$$$%'
 (
 



 
)
)










)*

*  )
 )




 *
)


( 

*


 *+

 )*
*
,


  

-.
$/
#
."
.0%1'


 (


  









 
)
02



 
'
 


 




 
*



  3





 
)


 

 
)
& 
4*+

0
*
)
 (

)






5

"
*


 "














 



  






3
 
 
( 3





*
(

/


*

( )
( 3








*+
 






 667












8
5"
.
5&'


 (
)
*4 

 





 ()


(

0 (
))




  

 


 

 8 
9 :/
 
)
 :;
 *(9<




#




=>?@ABCDEDFGH>IGJ=KLMNOPOOQRSNOSRTS=ORNUPMRMTNMMVWTPLQL #19.. - 773 -




 


 




 



  


!!"!#$
%

&'
 $


'%(#$
$( 






'%'
 




'
'
  
 )$*+



%
  $(#$
$( &
  +
&

'% 

,



-../-..-

.)$*0 (!10 (!23 !
00 (4
56
)$*



%




 

(#$
$( 



'

%


 
! 4)!















2)  !)$
$)(#6
0
 5'




(#$
$( %
 


 


789:9;<=>9??97@A;78=BCD8=E=7FGHIJBK9??>J;;9B7KL;9M=?79;9NOBNPJOK=@=9N7AQ9;@A;RQJEK=>SA;TQJ;?JOB77A  

U.. 





UV
 W


0

'%




- U
X. 0'


   

  

!!"!#$(#$
$( 

'

  

'

&+

 


U.. 

(#$
$( Y !0(#)W)5)$*Z( 2
"
!6
)(#$
$( 
%

 %'



  )$* 

 % 
G[\]^_G][^S=KKE9;9PJ=;9N7AROT9;9QO=;?=RR9N=O79KLIO7G[\]^_G][^`??AK9>A?7OBN9DQ9B?9I7A  

 )$*)
 
  (#$
$( 

 
 
%

 )$* %
 

 
% (#$
$( 




 

 
 







  (#$
$(  &


'

&


 
 %,X%

a#($)!6


%


%


 



'% 

!!"!#$ '




 

 %

' '

&




%




&+
bcdefghijiklmcnlobpqrstuttvwxstxwyxbtwszurwrysrr{|yuqvq #19.. - 774 -





























 
 




 



 


!"
 #$%&'(

"
 
) 
$#(&*   
!
+
,


 -
./
  "" 0(1'  ,


$#*#*  2




 


/


3
/





- 
 








"
4$"!5


+6!278





2





3


 















 /
--



0 -



5 22,2
"
'%"9

!
!2
-0-
-



"
'4"8.!5

-
0 


3

-

--
- 


-


3


-"
8-

- -
0 



-







5 22,2

-




"
''"
2 5:2
,2
; )!)+8.2.
52!2
!-
-

3









-


-



;
-













  
3-
-



3







3

0 




/



-3-



"!

3
-


 



  










"
<=>?@ABCDCEFG=HFI<JKLMNONNPQRMNRQSR<NQMTOLQLSMLLUVSOKPK #19.. - 775 -


 





!!
!"



#$%%
&#'




%%
%&%%$#

$
%
$
%


%
$
'



"

%
"
$"%
"("
%
"
%""
#
%

#
)


%#*"$
%#
)
%# 
*"(%

"
$
'
'#'$ +#%

%
%&!,%
%
$


$(#"'
%
#



"


"'"%$
"

"#%%


#


%
$





#$%%
&#'



%%-%
# 


%
$#%


%
$


#







#$%%
&#'



%%

%$&
-

+
!
%
$
#.

)
-


#"


/011,*#%
'%
%


%##)
%
#
-

#"%"#


2341 ,*%
'%%

+!
%
$
#.





%

-


#"


/011"

4
-
5
%


%
#
-

#


#



'$
#
#


%%
'



#$%%
&#'



%%-&



'%

#
%
%'

6
&&
$-

%%
-'









%%
%#
#


#

%

-


%
$%%
&#'






!
7 !

#



%%


'$-


+!
%
$
# .
#
8

'%

$
#

%'
"'
9:;<=>?@A@BCD:ECF9GHIJKLKKMNOJKONPO9KNJQLINIPJIIRSPLHMH #19.. - 776 -
 


















!
"


#"$

"
%&'()
!!"*+"

"

 $!
 "
,
)
)-./00102'3
"345"6" +
7
)-./00102'8%92'/-%'9/ "
"
)


)
!!!!,

:" $!
 ",
)
)"-"
,
)#
:!
"-
;<<=8
)"
$$!
:!"




>"
"*+""
$+!7

"
"$"
)""
8


5
)"
$$!
:!"?"
"
!!
,

 "7+!

"!

7
)


$
 



$

 $

8

,!! 
+"




!"


)"
+


)"-./00102'


5"6
"
)""3
@A3%92'/-%'9/B&%02C0CDE0/1&'CF
%92'/-%'9/,




"$""

)


$""

)
!!



!!! ""8

)
!!
" +"





!!" "
5$"
8" "
5
$"
)"C0/G&%0C3
@H3/0%9/#CF
-!!
!>""$
8

8
$8
"!8 )

8
+
"8+>"58$)
7
$)8
"


8$!
8
+
"8$" 

8" 
8!"8
5
)"
 +"


"
!8"!"
 
5 
)"8
)

%92'/-%'9/$"$
":

$++



)-7"""



)

"!

"

)"

"
>""
)""+
")
!!:"
)"$$"
5
)"%&'(3%92'/-%'9/)"":5
7""

"!>"
)"
 +"



)"%&'(+$
"


)"-./00102'8


)"%&'(
5+"8"+"
)","
$"
)"
I
J


KLMNOPKNLOQIRS

T




I





"
!8 !+
7:+

!
"


)"
" :"

:>"8$"$
"
$++



)-./00102'
"
$"$
"
$" 
!!5
)"%
5


"
" "
!5+

:!"
5+
+"
)"+"3
@U3?-%&B&'&0C-2#0VW&E102'F
06 "$

"

))""8%92'/-%'9/)
!!8


!" 


"6$""8$>
"
!!
!
"


"*+$"

)


5:"" "
5
$"
)""> ""*+"
:5
)-./00102'3%&'()
!!
X"
YZ[\]^_`a`bcdZecfYghijklkkmnojkonpoYknjqlinipjiirsplhmh #19.. - 777 -
 



 

 !
!" #
$%&$&'()*+,-.+,/$/.+))&$0.'$%%&'&/+1
23145678756759:;59<=:9;<>5;9=?759@
=$*AA$/(&),B'/+C$%&$&'(.0$%/)=?<77D759E:;59<=:9;<)%*AAF&*+/+,&G&+,&+$ -.+$'*-$.'*+,)%*AA+.$F&*+&(GA.H&&.0:49I1:49I)%*AA%*J&$%&'/C%$$.-.+$'.A:;59<=:9;<.+AH  ## 



K#### /)=?<77D75917L-&G$*):/$H(*H )G&-/0H/+M'/$/+CE:;59<=:9;<)%*AA%*J&+.*B$%.'/$HE&LG'&)).'/(GA/&,E$.*-$.+F&%*A0.0:49I/+*+H -*G*-/$HM%*$).&J&'*)*+*C&+$1:;59<=:9;<)%*AA%*J&+.*B$%.'/$HE&LG'&)).'/(GA/&,EGB')B*+$$.$%/) =?<77D759$.F/+,:/$H$.*+H.FA/C*$/.+M%*$).&J&'1
2N16<O?P<77Q;<R8S=:7@
:;59<=:9;<-&'$/0/&)$%*$/$/)0.AA.M/+C*+,/+-.(GA/*+-&M/$%T&-$/.+)NUVWXNUVV.0 :%*G$&'V1V.0$%&?.J&'+(&+$:.,&E6'BCP'&&Q.'YGA*-&=-$M%&'&FH&*-%G&').+.'.'C*+/Z*$/.+*M*',&,* -.+$'*-$[GB'-%*)&.',&'.'C'*+$0.'$%&G'.-B'&(&+$.0*+HG'.G&'$H.')&'J/-&0'.(*+H)$*$&*C&+-H\-/$H])%*AA -&'$/0H$.$%&-.+$'*-$/+C.'C'*+$/+C*C&+-H$%*$/$M/AAG'.J/,&*,'BC0'&&M.'YGA*-&1 2^1=TT4?5D759@
5&/$%&'$%/)=?<77D759+.'*+HT7<_4:7T%&'&B+,&')%*AAF&)BF-.+$'*-$&,.'*))/C+&,FH :;59<=:9;<M/$%.B$$%&G'/.'M'/$$&+-.+)&+$.0$%&:49I/+&*-%*+,&J&'H/+)$*+-&1 UW1Q=4_7<@
9%&M*/J&'FH*+HG*'$H$.$%/)=?<77D759.0*F'&*-%.0*+HG'.J/)/.+%&'&.0)%*AAF&/+ M'/$/+C*+,)%*AA+.$.G&'*$&.'F&-.+)$'B&,*)*M*/J&'.0*+H.$%&'.')BF)&`B&+$F'&*-%%&'&.0B+A&)) )G&-/0/-*AAH)$*$&,/+M'/$/+C1
Ua1b7=645?T5;9:;59<;SS45?@
cdefghijkjlmndompcqrstuvuuwxytuyxzycuxt{vsxsztss|}zvrwr #19.. - 778 -

 



   
   
 
   






 !"##
$%!&
'()* (+ ,- ./* *++*01* (0 234'562'357+ 8*9-,9):01* ;0<*9 *:1/ 89,=(+(,0 ,- ./(+






&



 
 >

 


 


 
? "$

"
$ 
"
@


  ?
 
 



?

A  234'562'357B C(< :9*

    
  "$

"
$     !D "!  



 




  
 

 EFG 




  >

"G
 




 A
  

?

 EF 



G




 


 A
 G   

 
A




G ?


   ?

G

 
 >



 >





A  
 





 


?A  >

  


G 
G  A 




   A
  
  ?
 

 


H
I


# D
# J
@&
  A 




   

 

K


  AG
AG 
G

  A 
 A

 

  
  ?



 
 A
   ?

LMNOPQRS TSUVWMXV YLZ [\]^_^^`ab]^bacbL^a]d_\a\c]\\efc_[`[ #19.. - 779 -
 


















 

!


"

#$

%&


&$
 



 %&


&
' 




&
" 





()*)+,---------

 %&


"

&
"




----------- &
"
---------------
)*)+ . 




(

 

#$



% &!
 (

/01234567689:0;9</=>?@ABAACDE@AEDFE/AD@GB?D?F@??HIFB>C>

JKL MNKOPQR STT
#19..
- 780 -







 
 





!

"#

$


%
#
&

  $'
'$$(

)

(



!#*

  
! '
# #



! '
# #


$

(+
$
(

 



$'

!$#!

$

(+
$
(

 $

,($

$()

(-*

"#


#.#
 / 


01234567879:;1<:=0>?@ABCBBDEFABFEGF0BEAHC@E@GA@@IJGC?D? KLMNOPQRSPTQUVUW WNQ XYZ[\]^Y_`
aTbTPRTQOcMQdSeTO f[gf[gY[Y_
#19..
- 781 -
California Levine Act Disclosure
California Government Code Section 84308, also known as the "Levine Act", prohibits City “officers” from participating in any action related to a license, permit, or other entitlement for use (a “proceeding”) if such member accepts, solicits, or directs political contributions from a party to the proceeding or their agent totaling more than $500 while the proceeding is pending before the agency, and for twelve (12) months following the date a decision concerning the proceeding has been made. The Levine Act also requires disclosure of such contribution by a party to the proceeding.

Section 84308(a)(4) of the Levine Act defines an "officer" as follows: “Officer” means any elected or appointed officer of an agency, any alternate to an elected or appointed officer of an agency, and any candidate for elective office in an agency. The term “officer” is further defined 2 Cal. Code Regs. Section 18438.1, which states:

An officer of an agency includes only those persons who make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence a decision in the license, permit, or entitlement for use proceeding, or who exercise authority or budgetary control over the agency of officers who may do so, and:
(1) Serve in an elected position, including an official appointed to an elected position due to an interim vacancy or an election otherwise canceled because the official was the sole candidate for the position; (2) Serve as a member of a board or commission;
(3) Serve as the chief executive of a state agency, or county, city or district of any kind; or (4)Have decision making authority with respect to the proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use and is also a candidate for elected office or has been a candidate for elective office in the 12 months prior to the proceeding.

A list of Modesto City Council Board Members can be found online at: Modesto City Council https://modestogov.com/706/Council-Members (modestogov.com). The party making this certification is responsible for determining whether a recipient of a political contribution is a City officer prior to answering the following questions:

1. Have you, your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions of more than $500 to any City officer, in the twelve (12) months preceding the date of the submission of your proposals or the anticipated date of any Council action related to this contract?
___ YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):
___ NO

2. Do you, or your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution of more than $500 to any City officer in the twelve (12) months following any Council action related to this contract?
___ YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):
___ NO
#19..
- 782 -
Answering YES to either of the questions above does not preclude the City of Modesto from awarding a contract to your firm or taking any subsequent action related to the contract. It may, however, preclude the identified City officer from participating in any actions related to such contract.

HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
_________________ _____________________________
Date Signature of authorized individual
_____________________________
Company/Applicant Name
C
#19..
- 783 -
Owner date Bid Time:

Owner address Contact/Tell:

Contact/Fax:

Contact/Email:

We hereby Submit Specifications and estimates for:

Painting As Listed Per Plant [Spot Prime and 2 coats Finsh DTM [metals] A100 for all other surfaces] DTM is Sherwin Williams Pro Industrial DTM in Eggshell or Semigloss Well #15 $10,003.00 Outfall Pumping Station $16,235.00
Light Standards $222.00 Each Vaulve Farm Actuators [5] $2,645.00 Backflow + 2 Gas Convaults $4,437.00 Scum Pump/Clarifyer #1 $15,762.00 Well #15B $14,325.00 Scum Pump/Clarifyer #2 $15,762.00
Sludge Meter Pit (2) $8,269.00 CBT Building Ext. $13,085.00 Saftey Railing [Digester Pits, not the bridges] $6,430.00 Digester Discharge Line + Sludge Mix Pump $15,700.00 High Voltage Cabinets $3,233.00 Digester Discharge Line + Sludge Mix Pump $15,700.00 Bld 34 + Generator Exterior $8,367.00 Sludge Mix Building Ext. $13,160.00 Diversion Structure $4,286.00 Sludge Mix Building INT. $26.925.00 Bld 42 Pipes $6,012.000 Grit Deck [22 Actuators] $8,620.00 Grit Pump Room + Headworks $16,847.00 High Voltage E. Generators + Substation A $13,494.00 Influent Screw $16,390.00 Crane $4,286.00
Cannery Seg. + Int. $28,500.00
We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with the above specifications, for the sum of:

All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra Authorized By: ________________________ charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents Dimitrios P. Rozakis, CEO or delay beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado, and other necessary insurance. Emmanuel M. Rozakis, COO Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance.

If either party commences legal action to enforce its rights pursuant to this agreement, the prevailing party in said legal action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of litigation relating to said legal action, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Acceptance of Proposal Signature:

The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Date of Acceptance:

Payment will be made as outlined above.

Note: This proposal may be withdrawn by Horizon Brothers if not accepted by 30 days.

Money Cost:

OR:

Project
Project location
Sutter Plant
H.B Restoration INC.
5907 26th St. Rio Linda, CA. 95673 - Email: [email protected] License # 1034975 - DIR # 1000055112
Cost Proposal & Estimate
#19..
- 784 -
Owner date Bid Time:

Owner address Contact/Tell:

Contact/Fax:

Contact/Email:

We hereby Submit Specifications and estimates for:

Painting As Listed Per Plant [Spot Prime and 2 coats Finsh DTM [metals] A100 for all other surfaces] DTM is Sherwin Williams Pro Industrial DTM in Eggshell or Semigloss Csst-Pmp101 $30,965.00 TP2 WAZ $33,845.00
TP2 Primary $17,005.00 Tp2 Spent Tank $25,250.00
A1LT Recirc CH EFF $10,235.00 TP2 3W Hydro $14,235.00
Phase 1 Primary EFF $9,815.00 TP2 Cooling $14,600.00
TP2 Dilution $18,670.00 TP2 3W Pump Station $26,200.00
Reasearh Channel Pump $22,145.00 TP2 Tetiary E Flow $7,635.00 Fine Screen $8,335.00 TP1 Setiary $24,245.00
TP2 Primary Floor $21,245.00 TP1 Membrane Tank $55,715.00 Membrane Drain $25,715.00 TP1 Oxidation $22,185.00
TP2 CIP Pump $6,315.00 Irrigation PWP Stations $18,235.00 TP2 RAZ Pump Station $46,195.00 EPS Station $85,100.00
We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with the above specifications, for the sum of:

All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra Authorized By: ________________________ charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents Dimitrios P. Rozakis, CEO or delay beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado, and other necessary insurance. Emmanuel M. Rozakis, COO Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance.

If either party commences legal action to enforce its rights pursuant to this agreement, the prevailing party in said legal action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of litigation relating to said legal action, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Acceptance of Proposal Signature:

The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Date of Acceptance:

Payment will be made as outlined above.

Note: This proposal may be withdrawn by Horizon Brothers if not accepted by 30 days.

Money Cost:

OR:

Project
Project location
Jennings Plant
H.B Restoration INC.
5907 26th St. Rio Linda, CA. 95673 - Email: [email protected] License # 1034975 - DIR # 1000055112
Cost Proposal & Estimate
#19..

CITY OF MODESTO

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE OF MEETING:

January 13, 2026
Date: November 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
FROM: William Wong, Director of Utilities
SUBJECT: Design Services Agreement for Del Rio Replacement Well 271 Second Amendment
CONTACT: Edgar Vargas, Senior Civil Engineer, [email protected], 209-577-5424 DESCRIPTION:

Consider approving a Second Amendment to the Agreement with West Yost Associates, Inc., of Sacramento, CA, for Design Services for Del Rio Replacement Well 271, increasing the Agreement amount by $395,900. (Funding Source: Water Fund) STRATEGIC PLAN ELEMENT:

The recommended action supports the 2025-2026 City’s Strategic Plan Initiatives, Goal D:

Provide safe, efficient, and reliable infrastructure through proactive community investment, maintenance, and sustainability efforts.

BACKGROUND:

In 1995, the City of Modesto purchased the Del Este Water System, which included Well 70 (formerly known as Well 271) located in the Del Rio service area.

On September 14, 2010, by Resolution No. 2010-409, Council approved and adopted the 2010 Water System Engineer’s Report which identified Well 271 for replacement in order to meet the needs of the existing Del Rio Service Area.

On May 9, 2017, by Resolution No. 2017-187, Council approved an Agreement with West Yost Associates, Inc. (West Yost) for Design Services for the Del Rio Replacement Well 271 Project for a total amount not to exceed $855,690.

On May 19, 2021, a Water Quality Lab Analysis Report identified that the contaminant 1,2- dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) was present at levels exceeding the maximum contaminant level (MCL), allowed per State regulation at Well 70. A second sample taken on the same day and a third on May 21, 2021, confirmed that DBCP was present at levels exceeding the MCL. #20..
- 786 -
City Council, January 13, 2026
Design Services Agreement for Del Rio Replacement Well 271 Second Amendment

On March 8, 2022, by Resolution No. 2022-137, Council approved a First Amendment to the Agreement with West Yost for Design Services for the Del Rio Replacement Well 271 Project, increasing the Agreement amount by $42,700 for a total amount not to exceed $898,390.

On September 30, 2022, a Technical Memorandum prepared by West Yost, recommended that a Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) Treatment System be installed at the well site to address DBCP concentrations.

On May 5, 2025, by Resolution No. 2025-149, Council approved the purchase of 14,426 square feet of real property for a total of $91,500 for the purpose of accommodating the new treatment system.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed Second Amendment to the Agreement with West Yost will expand the current scope of services to include the design of the GAC Treatment System:

Task 1. Preliminary Design and Basis of Design Memorandum Task 2. Design of Treatment Improvements
Task 3. Bid Period Services
Task 4. Project Management and Meetings
Modesto Municipal Code (MMC) Section 8-3.203 generally requires all purchases, which meet or exceed $100,000 for material, equipment, or contractual services to be formally bid.

However, exceptions to the formal bidding process are granted in MMC8-3.204(f), “Where the Purchasing Manager in his or her discretion determines that it is appropriate to amend the services or goods provided under an existing Agreement to include similar goods or services, of limited quantity or scope, in order to increase efficiency and avoid delays or disruptions to City projects or services”.

Here, West Yost, the Engineer-of-Record, has played an integral role in the design, bid period and well equipping support services of both the above and below ground improvements associated with the Del Rio Well 70 (Replacing Well 271) Project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Expenses associated with this effort are housed in the following Capital Improvement Program Project:
101078 – Del Rio Replacement Well
ANTICIPATED ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICE EXPENDITURES:

West Yost – Original Agreement $855,690
West Yost – First Amendment to Agreement $42,700
West Yost – Second Amendment to Agreement $395,900
TOTAL $1,294,290
#20..
- 787 -
City Council, January 13, 2026
Design Services Agreement for Del Rio Replacement Well 271 Second Amendment

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

This project was presented to the Finance Committee on October 22, 2018, as part of a Report on upcoming Capital Improvement Construction Projects where it was recommended that it be forwarded to Council for future award of construction.

CEQA/NEPA REQUIREMENTS:

On September 5, 2017, by Resolution No. 2017-347 Council certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Del Rio Tank and Wells Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION:

Staff Recommendations:

Resolution approving a Second Amendment to the Agreement with West Yost Associates, Inc., of Sacramento, CA, for Design Services for Del Rio Replacement Well 271, increasing the Agreement amount by $395,900, for a new total amount not to exceed $1,294,290 and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Amendment.

Resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program Budget in the amount of $395,900 to be transferred into the Project from Water Fund Reserves to fund the Del Rio Replacement Well Project and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to implement the provisions of the Resolution.

Approved by:

William Wong, Utilities Director
Joseph P. Lopez, City Manager
Attachments:

1. Resolutions (2)

2. West Yost – Agreement

3. West Yost – First Amendment

4. West Yost – Second Amendment
#20..
- 788 -
1/13/2026/Utilities/EVargas/Item X 1 2026-XX

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

RESOLUTION APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT WITH WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC., OF SACRAMENTO, CA, FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR DEL RIO REPLACEMENT WELL 271, INCREASING THE AGREEMENT AMOUNT BY $395,900, FOR A NEW TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,294,290 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, in 1995, the City of Modesto purchased the Del Este Water System, which included Well 70, (formerly known as Well 271) located in the Del Rio service area; and
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2010, by Resolution No. 2010-409, Council approved and adopted the 2010 Water System Engineer’s Report which identified Well 271 for replacement in order to meet the needs of the existing Del Rio Service Area; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2017, by Resolution No. 2017-187, Council approved an Agreement with West Yost Associates, Inc. (West Yost) for Design Services for the Del Rio Replacement Well 271 Project for a total amount not to exceed $855,690; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2022, by Resolution No. 2022-137, Council approved a First Amendment to the Agreement with West Yost for Design Services for the Del Rio Replacement Well 271 Project increasing the Agreement amount by $42,700 for a total amount not to exceed $898,390; and
WHEREAS, West Yost, the Engineer-of-Record, has played an integral role in the design, bid period and well equipping support services of both the above and below ground improvements associated with the Del Rio Well 70 (Replacing Well 271) Project; and
#20..
- 789 -
1/13/2026/Utilities/EVargas/Item X 2 2026-XX
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2021, a Water Quality Lab Analysis Report identified that the contaminant 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) was present at levels exceeding the maximum contaminant level (MCL) allowed per State regulation at Well 70; and
WHEREAS, a second sample taken on the same day and a third on May 21, 2021 confirmed that DBCP was present at levels exceeding the MCL; and WHEREAS, on September 30, 2022, a Technical Memorandum prepared by West Yost, recommended that a Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) Treatment System be installed at the well site to address DBCP concentrations; and WHEREAS, the proposed Second Amendment to the Agreement with West Yost will expand the current scope of services to include the design of the GAC Treatment System; and
WHEREAS, the Modesto Municipal Code (MMC) Section 8-3.203 generally requires all purchases, which meet or exceed $100,000 for material, equipment, or contractual services to be formally bid; and
WHEREAS, exceptions to the formal bidding process are granted in MMC8-

3.204(f), “Where the Purchasing Manager in his or her discretion determines that it is appropriate to amend the services or goods provided under an existing Agreement to include similar goods or services, of limited quantity or scope, in order to increase efficiency and avoid delays or disruptions to City projects or services.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby approves a Second Amendment to the Agreement with West Yost Associates, Inc., of Sacramento, CA, for Design Services for Del Rio Replacement Well #20..
- 790 -
1/13/2026/Utilities/EVargas/Item X 3 2026-XX
271, increasing the Agreement amount by $395,90, for a new total not to exceed amount of $1,294,290.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute the Amendment, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 13th day of January 2026, by Councilmember _______________, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember _______________, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

DIANE NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ____________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#20..
- 791 -
1/13/2026/Utilities/EVargas/Item X 1 2026-XX

MODESTO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $395,900 TO BE

TRANSFERRED INTO THE PROJECT FROM WATER FUND RESERVES TO

FUND THE DEL RIO REPLACEMENT WELL PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO IMPLEMENT THE

PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, certain budgetary transactions are necessary in the amount of $395,900, in order to fund the Del Rio Replacement Well Project; and WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program Budget must be amended.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it hereby approves the amendment of the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program Budget in the amount of $395,900.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to implement the provisions of this resolution. #20..
- 792 -
1/13/2026/Utilities/EVargas/Item X 2 2026-XX
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Modesto held on the 13th day of January 2026, by Councilmember _______________, who moved its adoption, which motion being duly seconded by Councilmember _______________, was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

DIANA NAYARES-PEREZ, CMC
City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: ____________________________________
JOSE M. SANCHEZ, City Attorney
#20..
- 793 -
#20..
- 794 -
#20..
- 795 -
#20..
- 796 -
#20..
- 797 -
#20..
- 798 -
#20..
- 799 -
#20..
- 800 -
#20..
- 801 -
#20..
- 802 -
#20..
- 803 -
#20..
- 804 -
#20..
- 805 -
#20..
- 806 -
#20..
- 807 -
#20..
- 808 -
#20..
- 809 -
#20..
- 810 -
#20..
- 811 -
#20..
- 812 -
#20..
- 813 -
#20..
- 814 -
#20..
- 815 -
#20..
- 816 -
#20..
- 817 -
#20..
- 818 -
#20..
- 819 -
#20..
- 820 -
#20..
- 821 -
#20..
- 822 -
#20..
- 823 -
#20..
- 824 -
#20..
- 825 -
#20..
- 826 -
#20..
- 827 -
#20..
- 828 -
#20..
- 829 -
#20..
- 830 -
#20..
- 831 -
#20..
- 832 -
#20..
- 833 -
#20..
- 834 -
#20..
- 835 -
#20..
- 836 -
#20..
- 837 -
#20..
- 838 -
#20..
- 839 -
#20..
- 840 -
#20..
- 841 -
#20..
- 842 -

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR
DESIGN SERVICES FOR DEL RIO REPLACEMENT WELL 271
This SECOND AMENDMENT for Consultant Services is made with reference to the contractual agreement between the CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter the “CITY”) and WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC., a California Corporation (hereinafter “CONSULTANT”), entered into by the parties on the 9th day of May, 2017, hereinafter referred to as "ORIGINAL AGREEMENT".

This SECOND AMENDMENT to ORIGINAL AGREEMENT for Consultant Services is made with regard to the following recitals:

A. The ORIGINAL AGREEMENT between CITY and CONSULTANT was approved via Council Resolution No. 2017-187 on the 9th day of May, 2017.

B. The FIRST AMENDMENT to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT was approved via Council Resolution No. 2022-137 on the 8th day of March, 2022, identifying additional tasks and increasing the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT’S contract price by FORTY-TWO THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($42,700).

C. On or about October 7, 2025, CONSULTANT submitted to the CITY a budget augmentation for further additional tasks requested by the City for the completion of work related to the Del Rio Replacement Well 271 Project:

Preliminary Design and Basis of Design Memorandum $86,500 Design of Treatment Improvements $252,500
Bid Period Services $17,300
Project Management and Meetings $39,600
D. Said document is attached hereto as Exhibit (2) and incorporated herein by this reference. Exhibit (2) identifies additional tasks to be performed by CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT’S additional costs for such tasks for a total of THREE HUNDRED NINTY-FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($395,900).

E. Paragraph No. 9 "AMENDMENTS" of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT acknowledges the parties understand it may become desirable or necessary for CITY or CONSULTANT to modify the scope of services provided for under the Agreement and any such modification must be in writing signed by both parties.

F. The parties to this SECOND AMENDMENT understand and agree that it is necessary to further modify Paragraph No. 1 entitled “SCOPE OF SERVICES” of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT.
#20..
- 843 -
G. The parties to this SECOND AMENDMENT understand and agree that it is necessary to modify Paragraph No. 3 entitled “COMPENSATION” of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT.

H. The parties to this SECOND AMENDMENT further understand and agree the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT is modified solely by the modifications contained in the FIRST AMENDMENT, and this SECOND AMENDMENT and in no other way whatsoever.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of this SECOND AMENDMENT to Agreement, and the mutual promises, covenants, and stipulations contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. The parties agree that each of the recitals set out above is factually true and correct.

2. Paragraph No. 1 entitled "SCOPE OF SERVICES" of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT shall be deleted and the parties agree to and hereby do substitute the following in its place:

SCOPE OF SERVICES.

Consultant shall undertake and complete the preparation of the scope of work as set forth and described in the documents attached to the (a) ORIGINAL AGREEMENT and referred to therein as Exhibit (A) or “Project”; (b) the FIRST AMENDMENT to Agreement and referred to therein as Exhibit (1); and (c) the SECOND AMENDMENT to Agreement and referred to herein as Exhibit (2).

The Consultant shall perform the services as described in the aforementioned Exhibit (A), Exhibit (1), and Exhibit (2) in a manner compatible with the standards of its profession and shall produce a fully complete project as described in Exhibit (A), Exhibit (1), and Exhibit (2) that is acceptable to City. The aforementioned Exhibit (A), Exhibit (1), and Exhibit (2) are incorporated herein by this reference.

3. Paragraph No. 3 entitled "COMPENSATION" of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT between the parties shall be deleted and the parties agree to and hereby do substitute the following in its place:

COMPENSATION.

Consultant agrees to perform the work on a time and materials basis not to exceed ONE MILLION TWO HUNDRED NINETY FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED NINETY AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($1,294,290) (maximum compensation) for performing all services and furnishing all staffing and materials called for in Exhibit (A) and Exhibit (B) to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, Exhibit (1) to the FIRST AMENDMENT to Agreement, and Exhibit (2) to the SECOND AMENDMENT to Agreement, as well as for performance by CONSULTANT of all duties and obligations under the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, the FIRST AMENDMENNT, and to this SECOND AMENDMENT.

The compensation shall be paid pursuant to and in the manner and at the time set forth below:
#20..
- 844 -
CITY shall pay CONSULTANT on a time and materials basis for actual costs for all work called for in Exhibit (A) and Exhibit (B) to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, Exhibit (1) to the FIRST AMENDMENT to Agreement, and Exhibit (2) to the SECOND AMENDMENT to Agreement. All work to be performed under this Agreement shall be billed at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit (B) to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, Exhibit (1) to the FIRST AMENDMENT to Agreement and Exhibit (2) to the SECOND AMENDMENT to Agreement attached hereto. CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices to CITY which include detailed tasks, hours worked, and billable rates for all work completed, and detailed receipts for any reimbursable expenses paid by CONSULTANT and identified in Exhibit (B), Exhibit (1), and Exhibit (2) or approved by the CITY in writing. Expenses for travel reimbursement shall comply with the City's Administrative Directive (AD) 1.2, as amended periodically. The City's AD 1.2 can be accessed at the following link:
https://www.modestogov.com/DocumentCenter/View/24156/Citys-Administrative-Directive-12 The aforementioned additional tasks increase the amount of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, and FIRST AMENDMENT by THREE HUNDRED NINTY-FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($395,900). The amounts listed above are the estimated level of effort for each task. In no case shall the total fee exceed the total contract amount under the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, including Additional Services as authorized, the FIRST AMENDMENT, and this SECOND AMENDMENT to Agreement without memorializing an additional written amendment to the original contract signed by both parties.

4. Except as herein amended or modified, the provisions of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, and FIRST AMENDMENT are expressly reaffirmed and remain in full force and effect to the extent they are not in conflict with this SECOND AMENDMENT.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this SECOND AMENDMENT to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT for CONSULTANT SERVICES by its City Manager and attestation by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ___________, adopted by the Council of the City of Modesto on the ________ day of ___________ __________, and WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC. has caused this SECOND AMENDMENT to be duly executed as of the Effective Date. #20..
- 845 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 846 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 847 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 848 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 849 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 850 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 851 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 852 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 853 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 854 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 855 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 856 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 857 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 858 -
EXHIBIT 2
#20..
- 859 -