Cities Index.
Agenda, first session

Monte Sereno City Council
November 15, 2022

Document
Agenda, first session
Meeting
November 15, 2022
Body
Monte Sereno City Council
Pages
233
Original file
11.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on montesereno.civicweb.net. That file is the official record.

AGENDA
City of Monte Sereno
Tuesday, November 15, 2022
City Council
7:00 PM
Monte Sereno City Council Chambers -
18041 Saratoga - Los Gatos Road,
Monte Sereno, CA 95030

MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY ATTEND IN-PERSON

OR UTILIZE THE VIRTUAL OPTION
How to Participate
To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can access and participate in the meeting as follows:

To listen (only) by telephone dial US: +1 669 444 9171 or +1 719 359 4580 or +1 720 707 2699 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 646 931 3860 or +1 689 278 1000 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 309 205 3325 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 360 209 5623 or +1 386 347 5053 or +1 507 473 4847 or +1 564 217 2000 or +1 646 558 8656.

When prompted by the system enter participation Webinar ID: 875 2129 2962 and Password: 705990.

To attend the meeting webinar with a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device: Please click this URL to join https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87521292962?pwd=aUNCZS85RXpiNXZpd1JkWnAwQTlSUT09 Passcode: 705990
Or iPhone one-tap (telephone connection) : US:
+16694449171,,87521292962#,,,,*705990# US
+17193594580,,87521292962#,,,,*705990# US
Passcode: 705990.

You will be prompted to install the webinar client appropriate for your device. Attendees are encouraged to install the needed software in advance at the following locations depending on the device being used. If you are unable to participate in real-time, you may email to the City Clerk at [email protected] with the subject line "Public Comment Item #__ " (insert the item number relevant to your comment) or "Verbal Communications - Non Agenda Item." Comments received by email will be read into the record, with a maximum allowance of three (3) minutes per individual comment, subject to the Mayor's discretion.

All comments should be a maximum of 350 words, which corresponds to approximately three (3) minutes of speaking time. If a comment is received after the agenda item is heard but before the close of the meeting, the comment will still be included as a part of the record of the meeting but will not be read into the record. Any member of the public who needs accommodations should email or call the City Manager who will use his best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety in accordance with the City procedure for resolving reasonable accommodation requests. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Manager at 408-498-5285 or [email protected]. If requested of the City Manager, agendas and documents in the agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability.

Page

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Page 1 of 233 ends

ROLL CALL

ORDERS OF THE DAY
The Mayor, or a majority of the Council by vote, may change the order of business, except for public hearings on the agenda for a set time.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Persons wishing to address the Council on any matter of City business not listed on the agenda may do so at this time. Each speaker will normally be allotted three minutes, subject to the Mayor or a majority of the Council’s ability to limit the amount of time allocated to speakers based on the number of speakers and the need for expedient administration of City business in light of the number and length of items on the agenda.

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Copies of communications have been provided to Council for review prior to this meeting. Council Members desiring to read or discuss any written communication may do so at this time. No action may be taken except to place a particular item on a future agenda for Council consideration.

CONSENT CALENDAR
It is recommended that all items listed below be acted on simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is required by a Councilmember. One public comment period will be provided, although speakers speaking on more than one item may be allocated additional time by the Mayor or a majority of the Council.

1. Approve the Minutes of the November 1, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting
Staff recommends approve the Minutes of the November 1, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting.

Staff Report -SR-22-148 - Pdf
6 - 11

2. Adoption of a Resolution Summarily Vacating Right of Way at 15255 and 15297 Karl Avenue.

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution to vacate the Deed of Right of Way at 15255 and 15297 Karl Avenue and find this action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15305.

Staff Report - SR-22-253 - Pdf
12 - 16

3. Accept the LAIF Report for the Period Ending August 31, 2022 Staff recommends the City Council accept the LAIF Report for the period ending August 31, 2022.

Staff Report - SR-22-262 - Pdf
17 - 19

4. Accept the Treasurer's Report for the Period ending August 31, 2022 Staff recommends the City Council accept the Treasurer's Report for the period ending August 31, 2022.

Staff Report - SR-22-261 - Pdf
20 - 21

Page 2 of 233 ends

5. Accept the Significant August 2022 Year To Date Variances to Budget Narrative for the month of August 2022
Staff recommends the Council accept the Significant August 2022 Year To Date Variance to Budget Narrative Report for the month of August 2022.

Staff Report - SR-22-260 - Pdf
22 - 24

6. Accept Revenues and Expenditures Report for the Month of August 31, 2022
Staff recommends the Council accept the Revenues and Expenditures Report for the month ending August 31, 2022.

Staff Report - SR-22-259 - Pdf
25 - 37

7. Approve Warrant List Dated November 15, 2022 in the amount $515,393.02
Staff recommends the City Council approve the Warrant List Staff Report - SR-22-258 - Pdf
38 - 40

PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. Public Hearings on Adoption of:
(1) Ordinance No. NS-230, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Monte Sereno Amending Title 9 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code to Adopt by Reference Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, 2022 California Building Standards Code, Including California Residential Code, California Plumbing Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Green Building Code, California Energy Code, California Fire Code and the California Existing Building Code Subject to the Specified Local Amendments.
(2) Ordinance No. NS-231, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Monte Sereno Amending Title 9, Buildings and Construction, of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code to Add Sections 9.01.040 and 9.01.060 to Enact Specified Local Amendments to the California Energy Code, 2022 Edition, Title 24, Part 6 and the California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition, Title 24, Part 11 of the California Code of Regulations.

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
(1) Hold Public Hearing, waive the second reading of, and adopt Ordinance No. NS-230
(2) Hold Public Hearing, waive the second reading of, and adopt Ordinance No. NS-231
Staff Report - SR-22-251 - Pdf
41 - 177

Page 3 of 233 ends

NEW BUSINESS

1. Consideration of Appointment of Natalia Nazarova to Fill One of Two Vacancies on the Monte Sereno Better Streets Commission Staff recommends the City Council appoint Natalia Nazarova to fill one of two vacancies on the Monte Sereno Better Streets Commission.

Staff Report - SR-22-255 - Pdf
178 - 181

2. Consideration of Appointment of Allison Zeidler, Shalini Srivastava, and Thomas Connelly to Fill Three Vacancies on the Monte Sereno Site and Architectural Commission
Staff recommends that the City Council appoint Allison Zeidler, Shalini Srivastava, and Thomas Connelly to fill three vacancies on the Monte Sereno Site and Architectural Commission.

Staff Report - SR-22-257 - Pdf
182 - 191

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

1. Introduction and Waiver of First Reading of Ordinance No. NS-232, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Monte Sereno Amending Section 10.06.140 (Accessory Dwelling Units) and 10.06.150 (Accessory Dwelling Unit Amnesty Program)
Staff recommends the City Council introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance No. NS-232.

Staff Report - SR-22-250 - Pdf
192 - 208

2. Discuss and Provide Direction to Staff Regarding Potential Changes to the Municipal Code Section 10.01.020.AU Definition of ‘Structure’ Staff recommends the City Council direct staff to return to the City Council at a future meeting to amend Municipal Code Section

10.01.020.AU definition of a ‘structure’ to read as follows:
"Structure" means anything constructed or erected that requires location on the ground or attachment to something having location on the ground, but not including hardscape or swimming pools, spas, or Jacuzzis. For purposes of this definition, a structure shall include any dwelling, building, second unit, garage, carport, tool house, guest house, green house, pool house, groundmounted electrical equipment, ground-mounted mechanical equipment, ground-mounted plumbing equipment, ground-mounted solar installation, ground-mounted antenna or satellite dish, tree house or other play structure, tennis court, and play courts, but shall not include pools, spas, Jacuzzis, water fountains, sidewalks, patios, decks, pathways, paving, and other paved improvements installed at grade, such as outdoor stairs.

Staff Report - SR-22-263 - Pdf
209 - 233

COMMITTEE/COMMISSION REPORTS
This time is set aside to allow Councilmembers serving on Council committees or appointed by the City to serve on the boards, commissions or committees of other agencies to present a verbal report on the activities of the respective boards,

Page 4 of 233 ends

commissions or committees on which they serve. No discussion or action may be taken other than to place the matter on a future agenda.

Cities Association Board of Directors - Ellahie/Mekechuk Cities Association Legislative Action Committee - Ellahie/Mekechuk Cities Association City Selection Committee - Ellahie/Lawler Valley Transportation Authority PAC - Mekechuk/Leuthold Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority - Lawler/Turner Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority - Ellahie/Mekechuk West Valley Clean Water Board - Mekechuk/Turner
West Valley Mayors and Managers - Ellahie/Mekechuk
West Valley Sanitation District - Turner/Leuthold
West Valley Solid Waste/Recycling JPA - Mekechuk/Turner Youth Commission - Lawler/Turner
Santa Clara County Library JPA - Leuthold/Lawler
Valley Water Board - Lawler/Turner

COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS
This time is set aside to allow Councilmembers to make brief announcements or reports on the Councilmember’s own activities. No discussion or action may be taken other than to place the matter on a future agenda.

CITY MANAGER’S REPORT

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
This time is set aside to allow Councilmembers to make a specific request for an item to be placed on a future agenda. No discussion or other action may be taken.

ADJOURN
* All items on the agenda are subject to action/or change by the City Council In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk (408) 354-7635. If requested of the City Clerk, agendas and documents in the agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability.

Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II]

Page 5 of 233 ends

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council - Nov 15 2022
Agenda Heading: CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Contact: Gloisy Gonzalez-Langarica,
Department: City Clerk
Title: Approve the Minutes of the November 1, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting
Recommendation(s):

Staff recommends approve the Minutes of the November 1, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting.

Fiscal Impact:

There are no unbudgeted fiscal impacts with this agenda item.

Public Noticing:

The City Council’s agenda was posted at City Hall and the agenda and this report appear on the City’s website.

Attachments:
11-01-22 Regular Meeting Minutes DRAFT

Page 6 of 233 ends

MONTE SERENO CITY COUNCIL

MEETING MINUTES

REGULAR MEETING
7:00 p.m.

November 01, 2022

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
At approximately 7:00 p.m., Mayor Ellahie called the meeting to order.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Lawler conducted the Pledge of the Allegiance.

ROLL CALL

Present: Councilmember Leuthold, Councilmember Turner, Councilmember Lawler Mayor Pro Tempore Mekechuk and Mayor Ellahie

Absent: None
Staff Present: City Manager Leonardis, City Attorney Rudin, Finance Officer Samoranos, City Planner Perkins, Building Consultant Fatapour and Deputy City Clerk LangaricaGonzalez

Absent: None

ORDERS OF THE DAY
There were none.

PRESENTATIONS
Monte Sereno Police Services Presentation Report January - June 2022 by Chief of Police Field and Captain Moye.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
There were none.

Page 7 of 233 ends

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
There were none.

CONSENT CALENDAR (TO BE ACTED UPON BY A SINGLE MOTION)

1. Consider and Adopt Resolution Extending Teleconferencing of City Council Meetings Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953 (AB 361)

2. Approve Warrant List Dated November 1, 2022 in the Amount $47,198.05

3. Approve the Minutes of the September 6, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting, September 20, 2022 Special Joint City Council and Site and Architectural Commission Meeting, September 20, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting, October 4, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting and October 18, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting MOTION: Motion by Mayor Pro Tempore Mekechuk to approve the Consent Calendar. Seconded by Councilmember Lawler.

VOTE: Motion passed unanimously. (5-0-0)

PUBLIC HEARINGS
There were none.

UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There were none.

NEW BUSINESSS
(Council went into a short recess)

1. Consider Introduction and Waiver of First Reading of (1) Ordinance No. NS-230, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Monte Sereno Amending Title 9 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code to Adopt by Reference Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, 2022 California Building Standards Code, Including California Residential Code, California Plumbing Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Green Building Code, California Energy Code, California Fire Code and the California Existing Building Code Subject to the Specified Local Amendments and (2) Ordinance No. NS-231, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Monte Sereno Amending Title 9, Buildings and Construction, of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code to Add Sections 9.01.040 and 9.01.060 to Enact Specified Local Amendments to the California Energy Code, 2022 Edition, Title 24, Part 6 and the California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition, Title 24, Part 11 of the California Code of Regulations
City Planner Perkins provided a staff report.

Page 8 of 233 ends

Discussion commenced with regards to the report.

Mayor Ellahie opened item for Public Comment.

Public Comment was received from the following people:

Skip
Michelle
BW
Mayor Ellahie closed Public Comment.

MOTION: Motion by Mayor Pro Tempore Mekechuk to Introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance No. NS-230. Seconded by Councilmember Leuthold.

VOTE: Motion passed unanimously. (5-0-0)
MOTION: Motion by Mayor Pro Tempore Mekechuk to Introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance No. NS-231. Seconded by Councilmember Leuthold.

VOTE: Motion passed. (3-2-0)

2. Discuss and Provide Direction to Staff Regarding an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Amnesty Program, Changes to the ADU Owner Occupancy Requirements, and Review of New State Laws
City Planner Perkins provided a staff report.

Discussion commenced with regards to the report.

Mayor Ellahie opened item for Public Comment. Since there was no one wishing to speak, the Public Comment was closed.

Council provided staff with direction.

3. Informational Report on Administrative Policy to Define New Construction City Planner Perkins provided a staff report.

Discussion commenced with regards to the report.

Mayor Ellahie opened item for Public Comment.

Public Comment was received from the following people:

BW
Mayor Ellahie closed Public Comment.

No action was taken.

Page 9 of 233 ends

COMMITTEE/COMMISSION REPORTS
Mayor Pro Tempore Mekechuk shared that the VTA Policy Advisory Committee canceled their November meeting. He communicated he attended the Clean Energy meeting and stated Silicon Valley Clean Energy is doing well financially. He shared Silicon Valley Clean Energy changed their investment policy and how they are allowed to invest in something called CAMP. Stated there may be some opportunities for the City of Monte Sereno to get a better rate on investments. He suggested the Finance Officer and City Manager look into this. He shared West Valley Clean Water has a meeting this week and will be reporting at the next Council meeting. He shared he also attended a 2-hour workshop with Solid Waste. He stated to be prepared for solid waste fees to increase anywhere between 10% to 30%. Lastly, he reported attending last week an informational meeting with Valley Water Board.

Councilmember Lawler shared that the Silicon Valley Animal Control has its next big meeting next month, she also shared they are one of the only shelters that have been able to retain their veterinarians.

Councilmember Turner stated nothing to report.

Councilmember Leuthold shared that at the last Santa Clara County Library JPA meeting was their next 8 years strategic plan, and it’s now available online. Stated we have one of the best library districts in the entire county.

Mayor Ellahie reported the Cities Association got a JPA they are trying to get finalized to have proposed and brought to the City of Monte Sereno. He shared also attending the West Valle Mayors and Managers meeting and shared he learned about the SVRI Board the City of Monte Sereno is also a part of. He discussed the Builder Remedy Act and how under this law, cities that are deemed noncompliant with their state-mandated housing plans lose the ability to approve or deny projects.

Lastly, he shared going on a tour with the West Valley Sanitation District and a tour of the Google building through the Silicon Valley Clean Energy.

COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS
There was none.

CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Leonardis reported City is currently looking for volunteers to be part of the Better Streets Commission and Site and Architectural Commission. Those interested are welcome to go online and apply. Deadline to submit applications is this Friday, November 4th.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Turner would like to agenize the City Clerk position at a future meeting. She also would like to discuss the process for managing contracts. She would like some discussion on invoices being reviewed by the Finance Office as well as the City Manager. Lastly, she stated that she would

Page 10 of 233 ends

like the City Manager and City Clerk to get City assigned cell phones.

Councilmember Leuthold stated agreeing with Councilmember Turner. He is agreement that key positions such as City Manager and City Clerk should have City assigned cell phones. He also agrees discussion needs to be brought up on the decision making and recruitment on the City Clerk position.

Mayor Ellahie stated the cell phones is a good idea and perhaps additional assigned cell phones can be provided to Councilmembers. Mayor mentioned he would like to come back on what is “structural coverage” to be able to address the swimming pool issue, another meeting for discussion on the AB9, little libraries and lastly agenize discussion on the 10X10 shed.

ADJOURN
The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:34p.m.

Javed I. Ellahie, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Gloisy Gonzalez-Langarica, Deputy City Clerk

Page 11 of 233 ends

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council - Nov 15 2022
Agenda Heading: CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Contact: Diana Perkins, City Planner
Department: City Planner
Title: Adoption of a Resolution Summarily Vacating Right of Way at 15255 and 15297 Karl Avenue.

Recommendation(s):

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution to vacate the Deed of Right of Way at 15255 and 15297 Karl Avenue and find this action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15305.

Background Information:

The City Council accepted a dedication for use as right-of-way from the property owners of 15255 and 15297 Karl Avenue on July 21, 1964. At that time, these two properties were subdivided and the right-of-way dedication was required as it was envisioned that Karl Avenue would need to be widened.

Analysis:

The owners of the properties at 15255 and 15297 Karl Avenue have requested that the City vacate the ten-foot-wide road dedications, recorded in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, on July 30, 1964, in Book 6602 at Page 204. This dedication was provided at the time these two lots were subdivided and the street dedication was for potential widening of Karl Avenue. Karl Avenue has not been widened and such dedications were not required for other lots along Karl Avenue. Therefore, this dedication has not been used for its purpose since acquisition and is not necessary for any future public purpose. The 10-foot-wide road dedications along these two parcels can be vacated in accordance with the summary vacation proceeding authorized by the California Streets and Highways Code section 8330, because it is excess right-of-way not required for street or highway purposes. (Gov. Code 8334.) Additionally, there are no in-place public utility facilities which would prohibit the use of summary vacation proceedings.

California Environmental Quality Act:

This project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15305 – minor alterations in land use limitations.

Public Noticing:

Page 12 of 233 ends

The City of Monte Sereno's council meeting agenda was posted on the bulletin board outside of Monte Sereno City Hall and the agenda with this staff report can be accessed on The City of Monte Sereno's website located at www.montesereno.org.

Attachments:

1. Draft Resolution for Summary Vacation

Page 13 of 233 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO SUMMARILY VACATING RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 15255 KARL AVENUE AND 15297

KARL AVENUE
WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code section 8330, et seq., provides for summary vacation of streets and public service easements; and WHEREAS, the easement was accepted by the City of Monte Sereno on July 21, 1964 in Resolution 203 and was recorded in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, on July 30, 1964 as recording number 2676565 in Book 6602 at Page 204; and
WHEREAS, such easements are excess right-of-way not necessary for street purposes, and have never been used as such; and
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to summarily vacate the dedicated right-ofway as more particularly described herein Exhibit “A” attached to this resolution and depicted on the plat map attached as Exhibit “B” to this resolution.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The vacation is made under the authority of California Streets and Highways Code, Section 8330 et seq.

Section 2. The dedications of right-of-way for street purposes described in Exhibit “A” and depicted in the plat map attached as Exhibit “B” will no longer constitute a dedications from and after the date of recordation with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara. The Deputy City Clerk is authorized to cause a certified copy of this resolution to be so recorded.

Section 3. This action is categorically exempt from review in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guidelines section 15305 – minor alterations in land use limitations.

REGULARLY APPROVED this 15th day of November 2022 by the following roll call vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:
______________________________
BY: Javed I. Ellahie, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Gloisy Gonzalez-Langarica, Deputy City Clerk

Page 14 of 233 ends
Page 15 of 233 ends
Page 16 of 233 ends

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council - Nov 15 2022
Agenda Heading: CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Contact: Reynold Samoranos,
Department: Finance Manager
Title: Accept the LAIF Report for the Period Ending August 31, 2022 Recommendation(s):

Staff recommends the City Council accept the LAIF Report for the period ending August 31, 2022.

Background Information:

Analysis:

California Environmental Quality Act:

Fiscal Impact:

There are no unbudgeted fiscal impacts with this agenda item.

Alternatives:

Conclusion:

Public Noticing:

The City Council's agenda was posted at City Hall and the agenda and this report appear on the City's website.

Attachments:

LAIF Investment Report 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022)

Page 17 of 233 ends

City of Monte Sereno
Investment Accounts
Local Agency Investment Fund Wells Fargo Accounts Custodian For the period ending
August 31, 2022

ALL FUNDS REPORT

LAIF GENERAL FUND RESERVE ACCOUNT
Undesignated Reserve
Economic Fluctuation Reserve
Capital Improvement Program Reserve
Property Improvement Reserve
Other Post Emplpoyment Benefits
(OPEB)
01-025 Subtotal Unrestricted Reserves
05-025 Trafffic Safety
12-025 2107 GAS TAX
25-025 Storm Drain
30-025 Surety Trust
Building Fund
40-024 Loma Serena Ltg.

Subtotal Restricted Reserve
Total General Fund Reserve -
LAIF
7/31/2022
Revenue Interest
and
(Disbursements)
Transfers within
WFB between 5508
and 2153
Transfer in/(Out)
(From WFB 5508 to
LAIF)
8/31/2022 Comments
`
655,504.51 655,504.51
3,500,000.00 3,500,000.00
500,000.00 500,000.00 No Activity
200,000.00 200,000.00

0.00 0.00
4,855,504.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,855,504.51

0.00 0.00
133,096.76 133,096.76
21,000.00 21,000.00 No Activity
27,042.53 27,042.53

0.00 0.00
6,751.00 6,751.00
187,890.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 187,890.29
5,043,394.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,043,394.80
NOTES:

Interest is deposited directly to LAIF account. This monthly report is in compliance with the City's investment policy and demonstrates the City's ability to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

Page 18 of 233 ends

City of Monte Sereno
Investment Accounts
Local Agency Investment Fund Wells Fargo Accounts Custodian For the period ending
August 31, 2022

ALL FUNDS REPORT
SAVINGS ACCOUNT #5508
01-015 General
03-015 Law Enforecment
05-015 Traffic Safety
12-015 Gas Tax (2107)
25-015 Storm Drain
30-015 Surety Trust
40-015 Loma Serena Ltg.
50-015 Rose/Andrews Ltg
Total
WARRANT CHECKING ACCOUNT #2153
01-010 Total
Total All Funds
7/31/2022
Revenue Interest
and
(Disbursements)
Transfers within
WFB between 5508
and 2153
Transfer in/(Out)
(From WFB 5508 to
LAIF)
8/31/2022 Comments
93,744.66 98,317.68 (174,918.42) 17,143.92
In August 2022, received Comcast franchise fees
($18.8K), Gas Tax Revenue ($13.9k), SB-1 Revenue
($5.8k), SB-813 Supplementary Property Tax ($4.6k),
Permit fees exceeding $4k from properties on - Daves
Ave ($8.8k), Alexander Ave ($5.6k), Bancroft Ave ($4.8k), Via Pinto ($4.0k) and One Oak Ln ($4.0k).
241,391.15 0.00 (164,807.41) 76,583.74 Net transfer from 03-015 to 01-015 for payment of Police Services check #19945 $84,217 and check #19889
854.66 0.00 854.66
255,443.31 14,788.40 270,231.71 Received Gas Tax revenue ($9.0k) and SB-1 revenue ($4.8k)
69,523.86 0.00 69,523.86

72.75 0.00 72.75
2,819.13 6.17 2,825.30

38.94 0.00 38.94
663,888.46 113,112.25 (339,725.83) 0.00 437,274.88
62,365.50 (267,238.34) 339,725.83 134,852.99
In August 2022, paid Police Services ($84.2k), Net payroll checks to City Staff ($57.3k), Burke, Williams &
Sorensen for legal services ($19.2k), Alana Consulting
for Building Official monthly hourly services ($9.4k) and e-Permit development ($6.3k), and CalPERS Health
insurance premium ($8.3k).
5,769,648.76 (154,126.09) 0.00 0.00 5,615,522.67
NOTES:

Interest is deposited directly to LAIF account. This monthly report is in compliance with the City's investment policy and demonstrates the City's ability to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

Page 19 of 233 ends

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council - Nov 15 2022
Agenda Heading: CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Contact: Reynold Samoranos,
Department: Finance Manager
Title: Accept the Treasurer's Report for the Period ending August 31, 2022 Recommendation(s):

Staff recommends the City Council accept the Treasurer's Report for the period ending August 31, 2022.

Background Information:

Analysis:

California Environmental Quality Act:

Fiscal Impact:

There are no unbudgeted fiscal impacts with this agenda item.

Alternatives:

Conclusion:

Public Noticing:

The City's Council's agenda was posted at City Hall and the agenda and this report appear on the City's website.

Attachments:

TREASURERS REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022)

Page 20 of 233 ends

TREASURER'S REPORT For the period ending
August 31, 2022
August 31, 2022 July 31, 2022 Changes Higher /
(Lower) Comment
BEGINNING BALANCE $726,253.96 $757,897.27 ($31,643.31)
Receipts and Interest Earned
Receipts for the period 113,812.85 $529,657.76 ($415,844.91) In August 2022, received Comcast franchise fees ($18.8K), Gas Tax Revenue ($13.9k), SB-1 Revenue ($5.8k), SB-813 Supplementary Property Tax ($4.6k), Permit fees exceeding $4k from properties on - Daves Ave ($8.8k), Alexander Ave ($5.6k), Bancroft Ave ($4.8k), Via Pinto ($4.0k) and One Oak Ln ($4.0k).

Investment receipts during the period $0.00
Interest earned $0.00
Total Receipts and Interest Earned $113,812.85 $529,657.76 ($415,844.91) Less: Disbursements
Cash disbursements during the period $216,989.10 $510,724.44 ($293,735.34) In August 2022, paid Police Services ($84.2k), Net payroll checks to City Staff ($57.3k), Burke, Williams & Sorensen for legal services ($19.2k), Alana Consulting for Building Official monthly hourly services ($9.4k) and e-Permit development ($6.3k), and CalPERS Health insurance premium ($8.3k).

Invested during the period $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
GASB 68 Report & SSA fee $700.00 $0.00 $700.00 Annual GASB 68 Report EFT(PERS retirement) $13,711.15 $13,711.15 $0.00
EFT (payroll taxes) $22,755.12 $23,088.47 ($333.35)
EFT (PERS health) $8,287.02 $8,280.42 $6.60
EFT (EDD payroll taxes) $5,496.55 $5,496.59 ($0.04)
Bank fees $0.00
Total Disbursements $267,938.94 $561,301.07 ($293,362.13) ENDING BALANCE $572,127.87 $726,253.96 ($154,126.09)

BALANCE IN DEMAND ACCOUNTS
Checking $134,852.99 $62,365.50 $72,487.49
Savings $437,274.88 $663,888.46 ($226,613.58)
TOTAL DEMAND ACCOUNTS $572,127.87 $726,253.96 ($154,126.09)

FUND DISTRIBUTION IN DEMAND ACCOUNTS
General $151,996.91 $156,110.16 ($4,113.25)
Law Enforcement $76,583.74 $241,391.15 ($164,807.41) Net transfer from 03-015 to 01-015 for payment of Police Services check #19945 $84,217 and check #19889 $80,590.

Traffic Safety $854.66 $854.66 $0.00
Gas Tax (2107) $270,231.71 $255,443.31 $14,788.40 Received Gas Tax Revenue ($8,956) and SB-1 Revenue ($4,832) Storm Drain $69,523.86 $69,523.86 $0.00
Surety Trust $72.75 $72.75 $0.00
Loma Serena Ltg $2,825.30 $2,819.13 $6.17
Rose/Andrews Ltg. $38.94 $38.94 $0.00
Total $572,127.87 $726,253.96 ($154,126.09)

Page 21 of 233 ends

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council - Nov 15 2022
Agenda Heading: CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Contact: Reynold Samoranos,
Department: Finance Manager
Title: Accept the Significant August 2022 Year To Date Variances to Budget Narrative for the month of August 2022
Recommendation(s):

Staff recommends the Council accept the Significant August 2022 Year To Date Variance to Budget Narrative Report for the month of August 2022.

Background Information:

Analysis:

California Environmental Quality Act:

Fiscal Impact:

There are no unbudgeted fiscal impacts with this agenda item.

Alternatives:

Conclusion:

Public Noticing:

The City Council's agenda was posted at City Hall and the agenda and this report appear on the City's website.

Attachments:

SIGNIFICANT YEAR TO DATE VARIANCES TO BUDGET NARRATIVE 2022 08 31 (Final 10- 30-2022)

Page 22 of 233 ends

1 | P a g e
Significant Revenue and Expenditures Narrative
August 2022

16.7% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget
Revenues
SIGNIFICANT FULL YEAR VARIANCES TO FY 2022-23 ADOPTED BUDGET NARRATIVE  Revenues $0.7 Million (12.5% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR) - Property Tax $14.8 Thousand, 0.6% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Received Supplementary Property Tax SB-813 ($4.6k).

- Licenses and Permits $123.4 Thousand, 13.5% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: In August, processed 24 business licenses and received $42k in construction permits including project on Via Pinto, One Oak Ln, Poppy Ln, Alexander Ave., Eaton, Bruce, Saratoga-Los Gatos Rd, Constitution Ave., Bancroft Ave., Constitution Ave and Daves Ave totaling $26k. Grading permits $8k from properties on Alexander Ave., Bancroft Ave., and Oakhurst Dr. Encroachment permits for trimming trees near powerlines was $4k. - Franchise Fees $28.5 Thousand, 9.2% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Received $2.6k from West Valley Collection and $1.3k from City of Campbell JPA fees and $18.3k from Comcast. - Intergovernmental $263, 0.1% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: None for August 2022 - Other Revenues $21.0 Thousand, 7.5% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Received Road Impact Fees from projects on Alexander Ave., Oakhurst Dr., Vineland Ave., Constitution Ave., and Daves Ave. totaling ($5.1k). Collected Election Candidate fees ($2.8k).
- Gas Tax $28.0 Thousand, 14.6% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Received ($9.0k) Gas Tax Revenue and $5.8k SB-1 Revenue.
- Real Property Tax $14.1 Thousand, 9.8% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: None in August 2022. - Sales and Use Tax $2.2 Thousand, 18.2% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Received ($1.2k) sales tax from Board of Equalization.
- Investment Income/Interest $9.4 Thousand, 84.1% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Received LAIF investment interest $9.4k for the 4th quarter 2022 (April to June 2022 Quarter).

Page 23 of 233 ends

2 | P a g e
Significant Revenue and Expenditures Narrative
August 2022

16.7% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget
Expenditures
SIGNIFICANT FULL YEAR VARIANCES TO FY 2022-23 ADOPTED BUDGET NARRATIVE  Expenditures $0.5 Million, 9.4% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR - Personnel $221.5 Thousand, 14.7% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Slightly below budget with delayed hiring of combined Building Inspector/Enforcement Officer position. - Law Enforcement $none, $84.2 Thousand, 7.6% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Paid monthly police services ($84.2k).
- Construction $761, 76.1% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Paid ($761) for Monte Sereno Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan (CIP-2022-F)
- General Government $142.6 Thousand, 31.3% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Paid ($1.9k) for photography services at Annual Picnic August 2022. Paid Dicar Networks for monthly maintenance of office computers and IT support ($1.3k) and Bay Area News Group ($1.6k) to advertise 2022 Annual Pavement Project. - Maintenance $5.9 Thousand, 0.6% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR:
- Administration $54.0 Thousand, 10.2% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Paid annual license fee for See Click Fix ($10.5k) and Cities Association of Santa Clara County 2022-23 Membership dues ($6.5k) - City Attorney $none, 0% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: none. - Building Maintenance $12.0 Thousand, 40.1% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Paid Prime Tree Care ($6.9k) to trim and spray all trees at City Hall, spray Pine trees on Robin & Anne Ln, trim Redwoods by Winchester Blvd, and remove fallen trees.
- Equipment / Improvements $7.6 Thousand, 8.5% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: Paid ($1.8k) for various software licensing fee renewal.
- Building / Improvements $14.3 Thousand, 2.0% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: For the Annex ADA Building Project ($2.5k) to demo wall and disposal of all debris from Annex Building. - Engineering $0, 0.0% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: None - City Audit $1,535, 0.2.8% of FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget FULL YEAR: GASB 68 reporting service for FY 2022 Audit ($700).
-

Page 24 of 233 ends

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council - Nov 15 2022
Agenda Heading: CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Contact: Reynold Samoranos,
Department: Finance Manager
Title: Accept Revenues and Expenditures Report for the Month of August 31, 2022
Recommendation(s):

Staff recommends the Council accept the Revenues and Expenditures Report for the month ending August 31, 2022.

Background Information:

Analysis:

California Environmental Quality Act:

Fiscal Impact:

There are no unbudgeted fiscal impacts with this agenda item.

Alternatives:

Conclusion:

Public Noticing:

The City Council's agenda was posted at the City Hall and the agenda this report appear on the City's website.

Attachments:

REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022)

Page 25 of 233 ends

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget

REVENUES

PROPERTY TAX

LICENSE & PERMITS

FRANCHISE TAX

INTERGOVERNMENTAL

OTHER REVENUE

GAS TAX

INTEREST

REAL PROPERTY TAX

SALES TAX

FEDERAL RELIEF FUNDS AND OTHER
FINES

TOTAL REVENUE
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
2,326,700 4,616 14,837 (2,311,863) 0.6%
914,100 62,088 123,429 (790,671) 13.5%
310,000 22,202 28,480 (281,520) 9.2%
236,485 263 263 (236,222) 0.1%
280,700 8,477 21,045 (259,655) 7.5%
191,000 14,788 27,957 (163,043) 14.6%
11,200 0 9,425 (1,775) 84.1%
145,000 0 14,141 (130,860) 9.8%
12,000 1,378 2,188 (9,812) 18.2%
772,100 0 409,905 (362,195) 53.1%
3,000 0 225 (2,775) 7.5%
5,202,285 113,812 651,895 (4,550,390) 12.5%
Page: 1 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 26 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget

PROPERTY TAX
01-202 Secured
01-204 Unsecured
01-210 Homeowners Exemption
01-214 SB 813 Supplemental
03-316 Law Enforcement Tax (See Notes
Below)
40-366 Secured
40-368 Unsecured
40-370 Homeowners Exemption
40-378 Homeowner Exempt/SB813
50-402 Assessment

TOTAL PROPERTY TAX
Notes to Law Enforcement Tax - $89,000
03-316
Police Special Tax Assessment
per Assessor's Report May 5,
2022 - Total $89,000

SALES TAX
01-296 Sales and UseTax

TOTAL SALES TAX
01-298 Coronavirus Relief Fund (State)

TOTAL FEDERAL RELIEF FUNDS
Notes to Relief Funds (Federal & Other) $772k
01-298 Silicon Valley Clean Energy ($18k) - Secured if usd for solar panel/battery Prop 68 Per Capita Program ($180k) - Secured if expended by 12/31/2023 Federal Relief Funds ($409.5k) - Awarded Coronavirus State and local Fiscal Recovery Funds.

Unidentified energy, Parks, or Rescue Funding ($164k) - To be determined FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
2,108,700 0 0 (2,108,700) 0.0%
89,000 0 0 (89,000) 0.0%
5,000 0 0 (5,000) 0.0%
35,000 4,610 14,817 (20,183) 42.3%
89,000 0 0 (89,000) 0.0%
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 6 20 20 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
2,326,700 4,616 14,837 (2,311,863) 0.6%
12,000 1,378 2,188 (9,812) 18.2%
12,000 1,378 2,188 (9,812) 18.2%
772,100 0 409,905 (362,195) 53.1%
772,100 0 409,905 (362,195) 53.1%
Page: 2 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 27 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget

GAS TAX
12-328 Gas Tax
12-333 Gas Tax (SB-1)

TOTAL GAS TAX

FRANCHISE TAX
01-262 Gas
01-263 Electricity
01-264 Water
01-266 Refuse
01-267 Recycle HHW & JPA fees
01-268 Cable TV

TOTAL FRANCHISE TAX

REAL PROPERTY TAX
01-222 Real Prop Transfer Tax
01-225 SB 2 Real Estate Transactions
TOTAL REAL PROP. TAX

LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES
01-231 SB1186 Fees
01-232 Business License
01-234 ConstructionTax
01-235 SMIP
01-236 Construction Permits
01-237 Grading Permits
01-238 SB1473 (BSASRF)
01-240 Subdivision Fee
01-241 Site Development\Use\Variance\
01-242 Zoning Fees
01-243 Planning Miscellaneous
01-244 Encroachments
01-245 Community Planning Fee
. TOTAL LICENSE & PERMITS
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
109,000 8,956 15,816 (93,184) 14.5%
82,000 5,832 12,142 (69,858) 14.8%
191,000 14,788 27,957 (163,043) 14.6%
17,600 0 0 (17,600) 0.0%
38,000 0 0 (38,000) 0.0%
38,400 0 0 (38,400) 0.0%
130,000 1,031 4,110 (125,890) 3.2%
36,000 2,830 6,029 (29,971) 16.7%
50,000 18,341 18,341 (31,659) 36.7%
310,000 22,202 28,480 (281,520) 9.2%
145,000 0 14,141 (130,860) 9.8%
0 0 0 0 N/A
145,000 0 14,141 (130,860) 9.8%
680 96 624 (56) 91.8%
12,320 1,860 10,824 (1,496) 87.9%
36,000 423 708 (35,292) 2.0%
6,300 144 411 (5,889) 6.5%
697,000 42,231 84,567 (612,433) 12.1%
50,000 8,033 8,098 (41,902) 16.2%
3,000 43 210 (2,790) 7.0%
200 0 0 (200) 0.0%
8,500 1,900 3,300 (5,200) 38.8%
0 0 0 0 N/A
100 1,050 1,050 950 1050.0%
40,000 4,140 7,328 (32,672) 18.3%
60,000 2,167 6,309 (53,691) 10.5%
914,100 62,088 123,429 (790,671) 13.5%
Page: 3 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 28 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget
FINES
01-293 Alarm Soundings
05-322 Traffic Safety (Bails & Fines)

TOTAL FINES

INVESTMENT INCOME
01-282 Interest - General (See Notes
Below)
12-332 Gas Tax Interest
. TOTAL INTEREST
.

Notes to Interest - General - $11,200
01-282
LAIF interest payment received in
arrears - Estimated $11,200 FY
2023.

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
01-287 AB939 (recycle incentive)
01-288 Abandoned Vehicle Abatement
01-300 Motor vehicle (state)
01-305 Miscellaneous
03-318 COPS grant revenue
05-323 Miscellaneous (Measure B &VRF)
See Notes Below

TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
Notes to Miscellaneous (05-323) - $129,185
05-323
Measure B - Pavement
Management Program (Annual) -
$80,685
05-323
TDA - Highway 9 Safety
Improvement Gap Closure -
$26,500
05-323 VRF - To be determined
allocation - $22,000
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
0 0 0 0 N/A
3,000 0 225 (2,775) 7.5%
3,000 0 225 (2,775) 7.5%
10,000 0 7,834 (2,166) 78.3%
1,200 0 1,591 391 132.6%
11,200 0 9,425 (1,775) 84.1%
1,100 263 263 (837) 23.9%
2,000 0 0 (2,000) 0.0%
4,200 0 0 (4,200) 0.0%
0 0 0 0 N/A
100,000 0 0 (100,000) 0.0%
129,185 0 0 (129,185) 0.0%
236,485 263 263 (236,222) 0.1%
Page: 4 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 29 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget
. OTHER REVENUE
01-246 Road Impact fees
01-290 BCJPIA/State fund Ins. rebate
01-291 Microfilm Fee
01-292 Miscellaneous (See Notes Below)
01-294 Reimb. Publication
01-295 Election Candidate Fees
25-352 Storm drain dev fees
25-354 Storm Drain maintenance/Administration
General Fund Transfer for CIP
Beginning Equity Balance

TOTAL OTHER REVENUE
Notes to Miscellaneous (01-292) $283,600
01-292 Secured Grant for Annex Building
Project $198,600 (Budget)
01-292 Housing Element - Leap Grant
$65,000 (Budget)
01-292 Housing Element - Reap Grant
$20,000 (Budget)

TOTAL REVENUE
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
170,000 5,142 16,114 (153,886) 9.5%
500 0 0 (500) 0.0%
7,200 565 1,465 (5,735) 20.3%
85,000 0 0 (85,000) 0.0%
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 2,770 2,770 2,770 N/A
18,000 0 696 (17,304) 3.9%
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
280,700 8,477 21,045 (259,655) 7.5%
5,202,285 113,812 651,895 (4,550,390) 12.5%
Page: 5 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 30 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget

EXPENDITURES

PERSONNEL

LAW ENFORCEMENT

CONSTRUCTION

GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MAINTENANCE

ADMINISTRATION

CITY ATTORNEY

BUILDING MAINTENANCE

EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT

BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENT

CITY AUDIT

ENGINEERING

SPECIAL DISTRICTS

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

NET SURPLUS / (DEFICIT)
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
1,506,832 110,720 221,465 (1,285,367) 14.7%
1,110,604 84,217 84,217 (1,026,387) 7.6%
1,000 761 761 (239) 76.1%
456,000 4,853 142,557 (313,443) 31.3%
975,000 5,931 5,931 (969,069) 0.6%
528,660 30,092 53,960 (474,700) 10.2%
249,550 0 0 (249,550) 0.0%
30,000 7,005 12,033 (17,967) 40.1%
89,600 1,777 7,630 (81,970) 8.5%
725,000 2,480 14,257 (710,743) 2.0%
54,600 1,093 1,535 (53,065) 2.8%
33,272 0 0 (33,272) 0.0%
2,980 47 47 (2,933) 1.6%
5,763,098 248,976 544,392 (5,218,706) 9.4%
(560,813) (135,164) 107,503 668,315 -19.2%
Page: 6 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 31 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget

EXPENDITURES

GENERAL GOVERNMENT
01-505 Council Trvl, Mtgs,Protocol
01-506 Youth Commission Programs
01-507 Community Interface
01-515 Council Memberships
01-520 Elections
01-521 Municipal Code Revision
01-522 Environmental Services
01-523 GIS Mapping
01-531 Disbursement SMIP
01-532 SB1473 (BSASRF)
01-533 Disbruse SB1186 Fees
01-535 Professional Services
01-540 Insurance & Bonding
01-545 Code Enforcement
01-550 Community Based Organizations
01-555 Emergency Services
01-560 Annexation
01-565 Legal Ads/Notices/Recording fees
01-570 General Plan Revise
01-575 Misc/Refunds
01-576 Sales Tax
01-585 Animal Control

TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
2,000 0 12,230 10,230 611.5%
3,000 0 0 (3,000) 0.0%
15,000 1,900 1,900 (13,100) 12.7%
2,000 0 0 (2,000) 0.0%
15,000 0 0 (15,000) 0.0%
3,000 0 0 (3,000) 0.0%
12,000 0 0 (12,000) 0.0%
15,000 0 0 (15,000) 0.0%
6,300 0 0 (6,300) 0.0%
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
215,000 1,325 3,656 (211,344) 1.7%
89,000 0 93,646 4,646 105.2%
0 0 0 0 N/A
20,000 0 21,000 1,000 105.0%
12,500 0 0 (12,500) 0.0%
0 0 0 0 N/A
10,000 1,628 2,148 (7,852) 21.5%
0 0 0 0 N/A
200 0 0 (200) 0.0%
0 0 0 0 N/A
36,000 0 7,976 (28,024) 22.2%
456,000 4,853 142,557 (313,443) 31.3%
Page: 7 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 32 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget

PERSONNEL
01-605 Regular Full Time
01-615 Part Time
01-620 Long Term Disablity Ins
01-625 Retirement Employer
01-627 Retirement Employee
01-630 Health Insurance
01-635 Dental Insurance
01-642 Workers Comp. Insurance
01-645 Social Security
01-647 Medicare
01-650 Unemployment
01-660 Deferred Compensation
01-665 Benefits Allowance

TOTAL PERSONNEL

ADMINISTRATION
01-705 Office Utilities
01-710 Office Supplies
01-711 Postage
01-715 Office Equip Maintenance
01-718 Bank Fee Finance Charge
01-720 Communications
01-725 Reproduction/Printing
01-740 Mtgs/Trvl/Mileage reimb.
01-745 Publications/Memberships
01-755 Professional Services
01-765 Contract Services
01-770 Training
01-775 Miscellaneous
01-885 Horticultural/Arborist Services
01-999 City Mangers Revolving Account

TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
1,091,235 81,461 162,923 (928,313) 14.9%
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
95,593 7,771 15,543 (80,050) 16.3%
24,824 2,105 4,211 (20,613) 17.0%
135,177 8,287 16,567 (118,609) 12.3%
7,260 0 940 (6,320) 12.9%
8,400 335 2,398 (6,002) 28.6%
68,877 5,206 10,411 (58,466) 15.1%
16,143 1,217 2,435 (13,708) 15.1%
336 0 0 (336) 0.0%
38,586 2,637 2,637 (35,950) 6.8%
20,400 1,700 3,400 (17,000) 16.7%
1,506,832 110,720 221,465 (1,285,367) 14.7%
8,800 523 903 (7,897) 10.3%
14,580 5,601 5,864 (8,716) 40.2%
1,500 0 0 (1,500) 0.0%
40,760 0 1,185 (39,575) 2.9%
250 0 0 (250) 0.0%
24,300 261 11,514 (12,786) 47.4%
7,100 1,334 1,334 (5,766) 18.8%
19,700 3,282 4,232 (15,468) 21.5%
22,470 0 9,117 (13,353) 40.6%
0 0 0 0 N/A
361,000 15,698 16,418 (344,583) 4.5%
18,700 3,394 3,394 (15,306) 18.1%
0 0 0 0 N/A
7,000 0 0 (7,000) 0.0%
2,500 0 0 (2,500) 0.0%
528,660 30,092 53,960 (474,700) 10.2%
Page: 8 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 33 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget

EQUIPMENT/IMPROVEMENTS
01-805 Office
01-810 Field
01-811 Computer, Hard/Software

TOTAL EQUIPMENT / IMPROVEMENTS

BUILDING/IMPROVEMENTS
01-814 Building Acquisition
01-815 Building Improvements

TOTAL EQUIPMENT / IMPROVEMENTS
Notes to Building Improvement (01-815) $725k
01-815 Annex Building Project $600,000
(Budget)
01-815 City Hall Retrofit Parking Lot
$125,000 (Budget)

LAW ENFORCEMENT
03-545 Police Services
01-546 Booking & CAL-ID
03-548 Disburse COPS grant funds

TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT

BUILDING MAINTENANCE
01-860 Building & Ground Maint
01-920 Building & Ground Const

TOTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE

MAINTENANCE
01-845 Pavement Management Program
12-845 Pavement Management Program
05-850 Storm Drain Maintenance
05-870 Traffic Safety (signs & markings)
05-880 Traffic Safety (emergency calls&repairs)
05-890 Traffic Safety ( street lighting)
12-865 Street Sweeping
25-850 Storm Drain Maintenance

TOTAL MAINTENANCE
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
15,000 0 0 (15,000) 0.0%
0 0 0 0 N/A
74,600 1,777 7,630 (66,970) 10.2%
89,600 1,777 7,630 (81,970) 8.5%
0 0 0 N/A
725,000 2,480 14,257 (710,743) 2.0%
725,000 2,480 14,257 (710,743) 2.0%
1,010,604 84,217 84,217 (926,387) 8.3%
0 0 0 0 N/A
100,000 0 0 (100,000) 0.0%
1,110,604 84,217 84,217 (1,026,387) 7.6%
30,000 7,005 7,413 (22,587) 24.7%
0 0 4,620 4,620 N/A
30,000 7,005 12,033 (17,967) 40.1%
310,000 0 0 (310,000) 0.0%
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
627,000 5,931 5,931 (621,069) 0.9%
12,000 0 0 (12,000) 0.0%
3,000 0 0 (3,000) 0.0%
11,000 0 0 (11,000) 0.0%
12,000 0 0 (12,000) 0.0%
975,000 5,931 5,931 (969,069) 0.6%
Page: 9 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 34 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget

CONSTRUCTION
01-905 Gen Fund Road Proj.(FY2018/19)
01-915 Neighborhood St. Improve Project
05-905 Traffic Safety Project
05-925 Traffic Safety Misc Bike/Ped Improv
12-915 Gas Tax Road Project
25-910 Storm Drain Project

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION

ENGINEERING
Mapping and Records System
12-875 Congestion Management
25-805 WV Clean Water Administration

TOTAL ENGINEERING

SPECIAL DISTRICTS
40-935 Loma Serena Lighting
50-945 Rose/Andrews Lighting

TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 761 761 761 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
1,000 0 0 (1,000) 0.0%
1,000 761 761 (239) 76.1%
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
33,272 0 0 (33,272) 0.0%
33,272 0 0 (33,272) 0.0%
2,040 0 0 (2,040) 0.0%
940 47 47 (893) 5.0%
2,980 47 47 (2,933) 1.6%
Page: 10 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 35 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget

CITY ATTORNEY
01-425 Retainer
01-427 Litigation
01-430 City Attorney litigation
01-435 Mtg, Trv, Prot.

TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY

CITY AUDIT
01-470 Audit
12-472 Gas Tax Audit
01-480 Misc/Bank charges

TOTAL CITY AUDIT

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

NET SURPLUS / (DEFICIT)
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
84,550 0 0 (84,550) 0.0%
165,000 0 0 (165,000) 0.0%
0 0 0 0 N/A
0 0 0 0 N/A
249,550 0 0 (249,550) 0.0%
45,300 700 700 (44,600) 1.5%
3,000 0 0 (3,000) 0.0%
6,300 393 835 (5,465) 13.3%
54,600 1,093 1,535 (53,065) 2.8%
5,763,098 248,976 544,392 (5,218,706) 9.4%
(560,813) (135,164) 107,503 668,315 -19.2%
Page: 11 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 36 of 233

THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REPORT

FOR THE MONTH OF
August 2022

16.7% OF FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget

TOTAL FUND RESERVES

WARRANT CHECKING ACCOUNT
01-010 TOTAL WARRANT CHECKING

SAVINGS ACCOUNT
01-015 General
03-015 Law Enforecment
05-015 Traffic Safety
12-015 Gas Tax (2107)
25-015 Storm Drain
30-015 Surety Trust
40-015 Loma Serena Ltg.
50-015 Rose/Andrews Ltg

TOTAL SAVINGS

TOTAL DEMAND ACCOUNTS

LAIF GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT
Undesignated Reserve
Economic Fluctuation Reserve
Capital Improvement Program Reserve
Property Improvement Reserve
Other Post Emplpoyment Benefits (OPEB)
01-025 Subtotal Unrestricted Reserve
05-025 Trafffic Safety
12-025 2107 GAS TAX
25-025 Storm Drain
30-025 Surety Trust
40-024 Loma Serena Lighting District
Subtotal Restricted Reserve

TOTAL GENERAL FUND RESERVE

TOTAL ALL FUNDS
FY 2022-23
Adopted Budget

CURRENT MONTH
August 2022
FY 2022-23 YTD
ACTUAL
FY 2022-23 YTD
vs. FY 2022-23 Full
Year Adopted
Budget -
Higher/(Lower)
% OF YTD
ACTUAL VS.

Full Year
Adopted
Budget
Actual Year End
Balances
June 30, 2022
117,450 72,487 134,853 17,403 114.8%
83,711 (76,601) 17,144 (66,567) 20.5%
241,391 (164,807) 76,584 (164,807) 31.7%
630 0 855 225 135.7%
242,274 14,788 270,232 27,957 111.5%
69,524 0 69,524 0 100.0%
73 0 73 0 100.0%
2,805 6 2,825 20 100.7%
39 0 39 0 100.0%
640,447 (226,614) 437,275 (203,172) 68.3%
757,897 (154,126) 572,128 (185,769) 75.5%
647,671 (0) 655,505 7,834 101.2%
3,500,000 0 3,500,000 0 100.0%
500,000 0 500,000 0 100.0%
200,000 0 200,000 0 100.0%
0 0 0 0 N/A
4,847,671 (0) 4,855,505 7,834 100.2%
0 0 0 0 N/A
131,506 0 133,097 1,591 101.2%
21,000 0 21,000 0 100.0%
27,043 0 27,043 0 100.0%
6,751 0 6,751 0 100.0%
186,300 0 187,890 1,591 100.9%
5,033,970 (0) 5,043,395 9,425 100.2%
5,791,868 (176,345) 5,615,523 (176,345) 97.0%
Page: 12 of 12 File: REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES MONTHLY REPORT 2022 08 31 (Final 10-29-2022) Page 37 of 233

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council - Nov 15 2022
Agenda Heading: CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Contact: Reynold Samoranos,
Department: Finance Manager
Title: Approve Warrant List Dated November 15, 2022 in the amount $515,393.02
Recommendation(s):

Staff recommends the City Council approve the Warrant List Fiscal Impact:

There are no unbudgeted fiscal impact with this agenda item.

Alternatives:

Conclusion:

Public Noticing:

The City Council's agenda was posted at City Hall and the agenda and this report appear on the City's website.

Attachments:
2022 11 15 Warrants List

Page 38 of 233 ends

CITY OF MONTE SERENO
REGISTER OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AS OF THESE DATES:

November 15, 2022
CHECK
NO. TO FOR AMOUNT ACCOUNT NO.
20056 Vantagepoint Transfer
Agent-30
Fund 457 Retirement Plan for October
2022 2,110.57 01-660
20057 Association of Bay Area
Government
Natural gas utilities for City Hall ($180)
plus true-up FY 2021-22 ($56) 236.12 01-705
20058 Alamo Landscaping &
Maintenance Landscape maintenance for City Hall 550.00 01-860 20059 Alana Consulting, LLC
Hourly Services 6 weeks 09/26/2022 to
11/06/2022 ($12,478) and e-Permit
development ($9,890)
22,367.50 01-765
20060 All Earth Geotechnical
Engineering, Inc.
2022 PIP Inspection and Testing for the
2022 Annual Pavement Improvement
Project (PMP Annual)
3,590.02 01-845
20061 Burke,Williams &
Sorensen, LLP
Labor Negotiations ($861), General
Litigation ($108) and City Attorney
Services ($7145)
8,113.56 01-425
01-427
20062 City of Foster City CalOpps One job posting for City Engineer 540.00 01-565
20063 COMCAST Internet services for City Hall 106.67 01-720 20064 corodata Shredding,
Inc.

Standard record storage carton,
blueprint tube carton, plan carton and
refile carton services

77.70 01-710
20065 CSG Consultants, Inc
Building Inspector services ($7,130) and
Code Enforcement Services ($10,265)
both for September 2022
17,395.00 01-765
01-545
20066 Void Void Void Void
20067 First Choice Coffee
Services
Premium drinking water service and
delivery charge for City Hall 84.86 01-710
20068 Frontier
Communications Two dedicated landlines for City Hall 162.35 01-720 20069 Hillview Design Print
Media
Business cards for Alan Cunningham -
Building Inspector and Code
Enforcement Officer.
106.91 01-725
20070 KTUA Monte Sereno Bicycle Pedestrian Master
Plan project (CIP-2022-F) 1,536.38 05-925
20071 McKim Corporation 2022 Annual Pavement Improvements project (PMP Annual) 357,594.38 01-845
20072 Pacific Gas & Electric
Electricity services for Loma Serena Ltg
District ($177) and Rose Andrews Ltg
District ($47).
223.73 40-395
50-945
20073 State Compensation Ins
Fund Workers Compensation premium 30.11 01-642

Page 39 of 233 ends

CITY OF MONTE SERENO
REGISTER OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AS OF THESE DATES:

November 15, 2022
20074 The A.I.M.S.

Corporation
Don Wimberly, Consulting Engineer
(10/05/2022 to 10/31/2022) 10,000.00 01-765
20075 Town of Los Gatos
Finance Department Police services 84,217.00 03-545
20076 Wells Fargo Bank
Office supplies ($1682), Office phone
services ($377), membership and
subscriptions ($80), 2022 City Clerk new
law and elections seminar ($250) and
software renewal licenses ($443).
2,831.66
01-710
01-720
01-745
01-770
01-811
20077 Dicar Networks, Inc.

Building official computer no internet
connection ($250), Monthly managed IT
services ($1325), Microsoft software
licenses and Datto services ($1006) and
setup Kiosk computer, move computers
for City Clerk and Code Enforcement
consultant, and onsite training for
Boxcast ($938)
3,518.50 01-535
01-811
$515,393.02

I, REYNOLD SAMORANOS, FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICER DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE

PROCEEDING ACCOUNTS HAVE BEEN CHECKED AND FOUND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.

Page 40 of 233 ends

STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council - Nov 15 2022
Agenda Heading: PUBLIC HEARINGS
Staff Contact: Diana Perkins, City Planner
Department: City Planner
Title: Public Hearings on Adoption of:
(1) Ordinance No. NS-230, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Monte Sereno Amending Title 9 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code to Adopt by Reference Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, 2022 California Building Standards Code, Including California Residential Code, California Plumbing Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Green Building Code, California Energy Code, California Fire Code and the California Existing Building Code Subject to the Specified Local Amendments.
(2) Ordinance No. NS-231, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Monte Sereno Amending Title 9, Buildings and Construction, of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code to Add Sections 9.01.040 and 9.01.060 to Enact Specified Local Amendments to the California Energy Code, 2022 Edition, Title 24, Part 6 and the California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition, Title 24, Part 11 of the California Code of Regulations.

Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
(1) Hold Public Hearing, waive the second reading of, and adopt Ordinance No. NS-230
(2) Hold Public Hearing, waive the second reading of, and adopt Ordinance No. NS-231
Background Information:

The City of Monte Sereno is currently utilizing the 2019 editions of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, as amended by Title 9 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code. These codes are updated every three years by the respective code development organization bodies such as the International Code Council (ICC), International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO), and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). Proposed changes are submitted to the various code groups, reviewed by the code development committees, and voted on by the general membership at the annual meetings. If a proposed code change is approved, it becomes part of the next edition of

Page 41 of 233 ends

the code. In California, the California Building Standards Commission then has authority to further amend and then adopt the codes, which become uniform state law. Once the Commission adopts the codes, local agencies have 180 days to adopt the codes and must enforce the codes.

The 2022 Building Standards Codes have been adopted by the Building Standards Commission and will go into effect on January 1, 2023.

Local agencies are also allowed to make some modifications to the codes as adopted by the Building Standards Commission in accordance with provisions under state law. Local jurisdictions within the State are allowed to amend the codes further based on topographical, climatic or geological conditions as long as the code changes are comparable to or more restrictive than the State codes. If local amendments are not re-adopted before January 1, 2023, the version adopted by the Building Standards Commission applies by default and the local agencies are required to enforce those codes.

The City Council introduced Ordinance Nos. NS-230 and NS-231 at the November 1, 2022 meeting. Pursuant to Government Code 50022.3, there shall be a public hearing scheduled after the first reading of the title of the adopting ordinances. Therefore, the adoption of these two ordinances has been placed on the New Business portion of the City Council meeting agenda.

Analysis:

The purpose of the Building Standards Code, which includes all of the building codes and fire code, is to safeguard life, safety, health, property, and the public welfare through regulation and control of the use, occupancy, location, and maintenance of structures, and the quality of materials used in their construction. To assure compliance with the codes, City staff reviews plans and conducts inspections of projects.

Since 1994, the City has been working with the Tri-chapter Uniform Code Committee (TUCC), in an effort to provide consistency to all local amendments of the codes. TUCC is a subcommittee of the ICC-Peninsula Chapter, comprised mainly of building officials and plan checkers from numerous jurisdictions in the Bay Area, whose goal is to assist the design and construction community by developing consistent code interpretations among the jurisdictions and maintaining high standards with regard to life and safety issues. The TUCC makes recommendations to the Peninsula Chapter with regard to amendments to the various codes.

The members of the Peninsula Chapter vote on the proposed amendments for adoption.

Similarly, the Santa Clara County Fire Marshals Association meets and reviews the codes to determine if local amendments are warranted and to obtain uniformity in requirements in the area. In support of this goal, staff is recommending adoption of the codes and amendments as agreed upon by the members of TUCC, the ICC-Peninsula Chapter and the Santa Clara County Fire Marshals Association.

The proposed amendments are justified based on the local topographical, climatic and geological conditions that affect the area. The City of Monte Sereno experiences low humidity, high winds and warm temperatures during the summer months creating conditions which are particularly conducive to the ignition and spread of grass, brush and structure fires. Additionally, the City of Monte Sereno is geographically situated adjacent to active earthquake faults capable of producing substantial seismic events. The occurrence of a major earthquake would

Page 42 of 233 ends

significantly impact the ability of fire crews to respond to emergencies should the roadways be substantially damaged. In addition, fire suppression capabilities would be severely limited should the water system be extensively damaged during the seismic event. Therefore, mitigation measures are necessary such as: automatic fire suppression systems, communications systems, access to buildings, seismic protection, safety controls and other safeguards in order to minimize the risks to citizens, firefighters and property due to the severity of the fire threat and potential response delays.

Reach Codes
A reach code is a local building code amendment that “reaches” beyond the state minimum requirements for energy efficiency. During the last Building and Fire Code adoption cycle in 2019, the City Council adopted reach codes as amendments to the building codes which required that electric infrastructure (wiring, circuits, and panel capacity) be provided when a gas-fueled water heater, space heating equipment, or stove is installed in new construction.

Additionally, requirements for the pre-wiring for battery storage in new construction was also adopted at that time. Each of these items previously adopted by the City Council as reach codes are mandated in the upcoming 2022 building codes, so these do not need to be included in the local ordinance.

At the September 20, 2022 meeting, the City Council reviewed and discussed potential reach codes for this code adoption cycle and directed staff to include the following for new construction:
• Provide one Level 2 EV-Ready receptacle and associated infrastructure at each enclosed garage parking space, with a maximum of two, and one outside of the garage. • Require all indoor appliances, with the exception of cooking appliances, be electric.

Outdoor appliances can be electrical or gas-fueled.
• Provide an automatic hot water recirculating system.

These items are included in the draft ordinance in Attachment 2.

The proposed reach codes meet the requirements of the California Energy Commission for cost-effectiveness, and are also a cost-effective approach for constituents, contractors, and developers pursuing new construction within the city limits. A copy of the cost effectiveness study is attached to the Ordinance No. NS-231 in Attachment 2 to this staff report.

Public Noticing:

The City of Monte Sereno's council meeting agenda was posted on the bulletin board outside of Monte Sereno City Hall and the agenda with this staff report can be accessed on The City of Monte Sereno's website located at www.montesereno.org. Notification of this meeting was also emailed to a list of interested parties and posted on the City’s social media channels.

Page 43 of 233 ends

Notice of this meeting was also published in the Los Gatos Weekly newspaper on November 4 and 11, 2012, pursuant to Government Code 50022.3 requiring notice of the hearing to be published once a week for two successive weeks.

Attachments:

1. Draft Ordinance NS-230 - Building Code Adoption

2. Draft Ordinance NS-231 - Reach Code Adoption

Page 44 of 233 ends

1 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
ORDINANCE NO. NS-230

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE MONTE SERENO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, 2022

CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, INCLUDING CALIFORNIA

RESIDENTIAL CODE, CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL

CODE, CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE,

CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND THE CALIFORNIA

EXISTING BUILDING CODE SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIED LOCAL AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, each city in California is required to adopt the California Building Standards Code and is authorized to do so by reference under Health and Safety Code section 17922 and Government Code section 50022.2; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17958.7, each city in California may enact local amendments to the California Building Standards upon making findings that local amendments are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby makes the following findings and determinations:

A. The entire Silicon Valley is located in seismic zone D & E. Gypsum wallboard and exterior portland cement plaster have performed poorly during the recent California seismic events. The shear values of gypsum wallboard and portland cement stucco contained in the code are based on mono-directional testing. It is appropriate to limit the use of these products until cyclic load testing is performed and evaluated.

B. The City of Monte Sereno is located in seismic zone D & E. The increased possibility of earthquake activity in the area can affect the availability of emergency services due to damage to the water systems, damage to roadways, debris on roadways and the low priority of single-family homes in emergency conditions.

Historically, fire has been a real danger in the aftermath of earthquake damage, and the occurrence of a major earthquake would significantly impact the ability of fire crews to respond to emergencies should roadways be damaged, or if the water system be extensively damaged during a seismic event.

C. Monte Sereno is located in a hilly area with many canyons and areas of dense wildland vegetation. The area is subject to periods of low rainfall, frequent periods of low humidity and high temperatures, and is subject to gusty winds up to 30 mph. These conditions present an increased fire danger and increase the possibility of fire spreading to other properties that are not easily or directly accessible from the point of origin. The City also experiences low humidity, high wind, and warm temperatures during the

Page 45 of 233 ends

2 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
summer months creating conditions which are particularly conducive to the ignition and spread of grass, brush, and structure fires;
D. The streets within the City are a combination of public and private roadways, which due to the many hills and canyons are narrow and often dead end creating additional problems for vehicles and personnel to respond in emergency situations such as a fire.

E. Due to these climatic, geological, geographical, and topographical conditions, mitigation measures are necessary such as automatic fire suppression systems, communications systems, access to buildings, seismic protection, safety controls for hazardous materials, and other safeguards are necessary in order to minimize the risks to citizens, firefighters, and property resulting from the severity of a fire threat and potential delays in responding to such threats.

SECTION 2. Based on the local climatic, geological, and topographical conditions, identified in Section 1 of this ordinance, the City of Monte Sereno determines and finds that the adoption of specified codes in the Title 24 Building Standards with the following local amendments is reasonably necessary, and that Chapter 9.01 of Title 9 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code is repealed and replaced with local amendments to read in its entirety as follows:

Chapter 9.01
California Building Standards Code
Sections:

9.01.010 Adoption of Codes and Regulations by Reference

9.01.020 Amendments to Title 24 California Code Of Regulations, Part 2, 2022 California Building Code

9.01.030 Amendments to the Title 24, California Code Of Regulations, Part 2.5, 2022 California Residential Code

9.01.050 Amendments to the Title 24, California Code Of Regulations, Part 9, 2022 California Fire Code

9.01.070 Penalties Adopted.

9.01.010 ADOPTION OF CODES AND REGULATIONS
The City Council of the City of Monte Sereno hereby adopts Title 24 California Code of Regulations, Part 1 - California Administrative Code, 2022 Edition; Part 2 - California Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition, including Appendices I, J, and P; Part 2.5 - California Residential Code, 2022 Edition; Part 3 - California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition; Part 4 - California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition; Part 5 – California Plumbing

Page 46 of 233 ends

3 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
Code, 2022 Edition; Part 6 – California Energy Code, 2022 Edition; Part 8 – California Historical Building Code; Part 9 – California Fire Code, 2022 Edition, including Appendix B, C, D, and O; Part 10 – California Existing Building Code, 2022 Edition; Part 11 – California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), 2022 Edition; and Part 12 – California Referenced Standards Code, 2022 Edition; and Title 25 California Code of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 1, Sub-chapter 1, State Housing Law Regulations, subject to the specified deletions, amendments, exceptions, and additions as set forth in this chapter. A copy of the adopted provisions of this code shall be filed for use and examination by the public in the office of the City Building Official.

9.01.020 AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 24 CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS PART 2, 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, Part 2, California Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby amended in the following manner:

Sections 710A.3.1, 710A.3.2, 710.A3.3, and 710A.3.4 are deleted in their entirety.

Section 903.2 is amended to read as follows:
903.2 Where required. Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new and existing buildings and structures shall be provided in the locations described in this Section or in Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.12 whichever is the more restrictive and Sections 903.2.14 through 903.2.21.

For the purposes of this section, firewalls and fire barriers used to separate building areas shall be constructed in accordance with the California Building Code and shall be without openings or penetrations.

1. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures, other than Group R occupancies, except as follows:
a. Buildings and structures not located in any Wildland-Urban Interface and not exceeding 1,200 square feet of fire area.
b. Buildings and structures located in any Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area and not exceeding 500 square feet of fire area.
c. Group S-2 or U occupancies, including photovoltaic support structures, used exclusively for vehicle parking which meet all of the following:
i. Noncombustible construction.
ii. Maximum 5,000 square feet in building area.
iii. Structure is open on not less than three (3) sides nor 75% of structure perimeter.
iv. Minimum of 10 feet separation from existing buildings, or similar structures, unless area is separated by fire walls complying with California Building Code 706.

Page 47 of 233 ends

4 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
d. Canopies, constructed in accordance with CBC 406.7.2, used exclusively for weather protection of vehicle fueling pads per CBC 406.7.1 and not exceeding 5,000 square feet of fire area.

2. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout all new buildings with a Group R fire area.

Exception: Accessory Dwelling Unit, provided that all of the following are met:
a. The unit meets the definition of an Accessory Dwelling Unit as defined in the Government Code Section 65852.2.
b. The existing primary residence does not have automatic fire sprinklers.

The construction of an ADU will not trigger requirements to add fire sprinklers in any existing primary dwelling or existing multifamily dwelling accordance with Gov. Code 65852.2.

3. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in new manufactured homes (as defined in California Health and Safety Code Sections 18007 and 18009) and multifamily manufactured homes with two dwelling units (as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 18008.7) in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations.

4. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout existing buildings with a Group R fire area when additions are made causing the fire area to exceed 3,600 square feet.

Exception 1: Additions where all of the following are met:
a. Building addition does not exceed 500 square feet.
b. The resultant structure meets all water supply requirements of Chapter 5 and Appendix B of the 2022 California Fire Code.

Exception 2: The construction of an ADU will not trigger requirements to add fire sprinklers in any existing primary dwelling or existing multifamily dwelling accordance with Gov. Code 65852.2.

5. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout existing Group A, B, E, F, L, M, S and U buildings and structures, when additions are made that increase the fire area to more than 3,600 square feet or that create conditions described in Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.18.

6. Any change in the character of occupancy or in use of any building with a fire area equal to or greater than 3,600 square feet which, in the opinion of the fire code official or building official, would place the building into a more hazardous division of the same occupancy group or into a different group of occupancies and constitutes a greater degree of life safety1 or increased fire risk2, shall require the installation of an approved fire automatic fire sprinkler system. However, the construction of an ADU will not trigger requirements to add fire sprinklers in any existing primary dwelling or existing multifamily

Page 48 of 233 ends

5 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
dwelling accordance with Gov. Code 65852.2.
1 Life Safety – Shall include, but not limited to: Increased occupant load, public assembly areas, public meeting areas, churches, indoor amusement attractions, buildings with complex exiting systems due to increased occupant loads, large schools/day-care facilities, large residential care facilities housing nonambulatory clients. 2 Fire Risks – Shall include, but not limited to: High-piled combustible storage, woodworking operations, hazardous operations using hazardous materials, increased fuel loads (storage of moderate to highly combustible materials), increased sources of ignition (welding, automotive repair with the use of flammable liquids and open flames).

Section 1505.1.2 is amended to read:
1505.1.2 Roof coverings in all other areas. The entire roof covering of every existing structure where more than 50 percent of the total roof area is replaced within any one-year period, the entire roof covering of every new structure, and any roof covering applied in the alteration, repair or replacement of the roof of every existing structure, shall be a fire-retardant roof covering that is at least Class A.

Section 1505.1.3 is amended to read:
1505.1.3 Roofing coverings within the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. The entire roof covering of every existing structure where more than 50 percent of the total roof area is replaced within any one-year period, the entire roof covering of every new structure, and any roof covering applied in the alteration, repair or replacement of the roof of every existing structure, shall be a fire-retardant roof covering that is at least Class A.

Roofing requirements for structures located in a Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area shall also comply with Section 705A.

Section 1705.3 is amended to read:
1705.3 Concrete Construction. Special inspections and tests of concrete construction shall be performed in accordance with this section and Table 1705.3.

Exceptions: Special inspections and tests shall not be required for:

1. Isolated spread concrete footings of buildings three stories or less above grade plane that are fully supported on earth or rock, where the structural design of the footing is based on a specified compressive strength, f’c, no greater than 2,500 pounds per square

Page 49 of 233 ends

6 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
inch (psi) (17.2 MPa).

2. Continuous concrete footings supporting walls of buildings three stories or less above grade plane that are fully supported on earth or rock where:

2.1. The footings support walls of light-frame construction;

2.2. The footings are designed in accordance with Table 1809.7; or

2.3. The structural design of the footing is based on a specified compressive strength, f’c, no greater than 2,500 pounds per square inch (psi) (17.2 MPa), regardless of the compressive strength specified in the construction
documents or used in the footing construction.

3. Nonstructural concrete slabs supported directly on the ground, including prestressed slabs on grade, where the effective prestress in the concrete is less than 150 psi (1.03 MPa).

4. Concrete foundation walls constructed in accordance with Table 1807.1.6.2.

5. Concrete patios, driveways and sidewalks, on grade.

Section 1905.1.7 ACI 318, Section 14.1.4 is amended to read:
1905.1.7 ACI 318, section 14.1.4. ACI 318 is deleted, and reads:

14.1.4- Plain concrete in structures assigned to seismic design category C, D, E or F.

14.1.4.1- Structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C, D, E or F shall not have elements of structural plain concrete, except as follows:
(a) Omitted.
(b) Isolated footings of plain concrete supporting pedestals or columns are permitted, provided the projection of the footing beyond the face of the supported member does not exceed the footing thickness. (c) Plain concrete footing supporting walls are permitted, provided the footings have at least two continuous longitudinal reinforcing bars. Bars shall not be smaller than No. 4 and shall have a total area of not less than

0.002 times the gross cross-sectional area of the footing. A minimum of

Page 50 of 233 ends

7 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
one bar shall be provided at the top and bottom of the footing. Continuity of reinforcement shall be provided at corners and intersections.

9.01.030 AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 24 OF CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATION, PART 2.5, 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE
Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, Part 2.5, California Residential Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby amended in the following manner:

Section R310.1 is amended to delete exceptions #2 and #5 in their entirety.

Section R313.1 is amended to read:

R313.1 Townhouse automatic fire sprinkler systems. An automatic residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all new townhouses and in existing townhouses when additions are made that increase the building area to more than 3,600 square feet.

Exception 1: Building additions that do not exceed 500 square feet and the resultant structure meets all water supply requirements of Chapter 5 and Appendix B of the 2022 California Fire Code.

Exception 2: The construction of an ADU will not trigger requirements to add fire sprinklers in any existing primary dwelling or existing multifamily dwelling accordance with Gov. Code 65852.2.

Section R313.1.1 is amended to read:

R313.1.1 Design and installation. Automatic sprinkler systems for townhouses shall be designed and installed in accordance with Section R313 or NFPA 13D.

Section R313.2 is amended to read:

R313.2 One- and two-family dwellings automatic sprinkler systems.

An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in all new one- and twofamily dwellings and existing one- and two-family dwellings when additions are made that increase the fire area to more than 3,600 square feet.

Exceptions:

1. Accessory Dwelling Unit, provided that all of the following are met:

1.1.The unit meets the definition of an Accessory Dwelling Unit as defined in the Government Code Section 65852.2.

Page 51 of 233 ends

8 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5

1.2.The existing primary residence does not have automatic fire sprinklers.

2. When additions are made to existing structures, causing the fire area to exceed 3,600 square feet, and all of the following are met:

2.1.Building addition does not exceed 500 square feet.

2.2.The resultant structure meets all water supply requirements of Chapter 5 and Appendix B of the 2022 California Fire Code.

3. The construction of an ADU will not trigger requirements to add fire sprinklers in any existing primary dwelling or existing multifamily dwelling.

Section R328.4 is amended as follows:

R328.4 Locations. ESS shall be installed only in the following locations:

1. Detached garages and detached accessory structures.

2. Attached garages separated from the dwelling unit living space in accordance with Section R302.6.

3. Outdoors or on the exterior side of the exterior walls, and shall be located not less than 3 feet (914 mm) from doors and windows directly entering the dwelling unit and shall not be located below any emergency escape and rescue openings.

4. Enclosed utility closets, basements, storage or utility spaces within dwelling units with finished or noncombustible walls and ceilings. Walls and ceilings of unfinished wood-framed construction shall be provided with not less than 5/8-inch (15.9 mm) Type X gypsum wallboard.

5. ESS shall not be installed in sleeping rooms, or closets or spaces opening directly into sleeping rooms or in habitable spaces of dwelling units.

Section R328.7 is amended as follows:

R328.7 Fire detection. Rooms and areas within dwelling units, basements and attached garages in which ESS are installed shall be protected by smoke alarms in accordance with Section R314. A heat detector, listed and interconnected to the smoke alarms, shall be installed in locations within dwelling units and attached garages where smoke alarms cannot be installed based on their listing.

ESS installed in Group R-3 and townhomes shall comply with the following:

Page 52 of 233 ends

9 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5

1. Rooms and areas within dwellings units, sleeping units, basements and attached garages in which ESS are installed shall be protected by smoke alarms in accordance with Section R314.

2. A listed heat alarm interconnected to the smoke alarms shall be installed in locations within dwelling units, sleeping units and attached garages where smoke alarms cannot be installed based on their listing.

Exceptions:

1. A listed heat detector may be used in place of a heat alarm, so long as it is interconnected with devices that provide an audible alarm at all sleeping areas.

2. A fire sprinkler associated with an approved automatic sprinkler system that triggers an audible alarm upon activation of the waterflow switch, may be used in place of a heat alarm.

Section R337.7.10 is amended to read:

R337.7.10 Underside of appendages. The underside of overhanging appendages shall be enclosed to grade in accordance with the requirements of this chapter or the underside of the exposed underfloor shall be protected by one or more of the following:

1. Noncombustible material.

2. Ignition-resistant material. The ignition-resistant material shall be labeled for exterior use and shall meet the requirements of Section R337.7.2.

3. Materials approved for not less than 1-hour fire-resistance-rated construction on the exterior side, as tested in accordance with ASTM E119 or UL 263.
` 4. One layer of 5/8-inch (16 mm) Type X gypsum sheathing applied behind an exterior covering on the underside of the floor projection.

5. The exterior portion of a 1-hour fire-resistance rated exterior assembly, as tested in accordance with ASTM E119 or UL 263, applied to the underside of the appendage, including assemblies using the gypsum panel and sheathing products listed in the Gypsum Association Fire Resistance Design Manual.

6. The underside of a appendage assembly that meets the performance criteria in accordance with the test procedures set forth in SFM Standard 12-7A-3.

Exception:

Structural columns and beams do not require protection when they are

Page 53 of 233 ends

10 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
constructed with sawn lumber or glue-laminated wood with the smallest minimum nominal dimension of 4 inches (102 mm). Sawn or gluelaminated planks splined, tongue-and-grove, or set close together and well spiked.

Section R337.10.3 is amended to read as follows:

R337.10.3. Where required. Accessory structures shall comply with the requirements of this section.

Sections R337.10.3.1, R337.10.3.2, R337.10.3.3, and R337.10.3.4 are deleted in their entirety.

Section R602.10.3(3) is amended to read as follows:
(a) Table R602.10.3(3) (Bracing Requirements based on Seismic Design Category) of CRC Chapter 6 (Wall Construction) is amended as follows:
(1) The title of Table R602.10.3(3) is amended to read:

TABLE R602.10.3(3)g
(2) Footnote “g” is added Table R602.10.3(3), to read:
g. In Seismic Design Categories D0, D1, and D2, Method GB is not permitted, and the use of Method PCP is limited to one-story dwellings and accessory structures.

Section R602.10.4.5 is added to Section R602.10.4 (Construction methods for braced wall panels) of CRC Chapter 6 (Wall Construction), to read:

R602.10.4.5 Limits on methods GB and PCP. In Seismic Design Categories D0, D1, and D2, Method GB is not permitted, but gypsum board is permitted to be placed on the opposite side of the studs from other types of braced wall panel sheathing. In Seismic Design Categories D0, D1, and D2, the use of Method PCP is limited to onestory dwellings and accessory structures.

Section R902.1.2 is amended to read:

R902.1.2 Roof coverings in all other areas. The entire roof covering of every existing structure where more than 50 percent of the total roof area is replaced within any one-year period, the entire roof covering of every new structure, and any roof covering applied in the alteration, repair or replacement of the roof of every existing structure, shall be a fire-retardant roof covering that is at least Class A.

Page 54 of 233 ends

11 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
Section R902.1.3 is amended to read:

R902.1.3 Roofing coverings within the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. The entire roof covering of every existing structure where more than 50 percent of the total roof area is replaced within any oneyear period, the entire roof covering of every new structure, and any roof covering applied in the alteration, repair or replacement of the roof of every existing structure, shall be a fire-retardant roof covering that is at least Class A.

Roofing requirements for structures located in a Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area shall also comply with Section R337.5.

9.01.050 AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 24 CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS PART 9, 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, Part 9, California Fire Code, 2022 Edition, is hereby amended in the following manner:

Chapter 1 Scope and Administration
SECTION 108 INSPECTIONS
Section 108.5 is added to read as follows:
108.5 Final Inspection. No final inspection as to all or any portion of a development shall be deemed completed until the installation of the required fire protection facilities and access ways have been completed and approved. No final certificate of occupancy may be granted until the Fire Department issues notice of final clearance of such fire protection facilities and access ways to the Building Department.

SECTION 112 VIOLATIONS
Section 112.4 is amended to read as follows:
112.4 Violation Penalties. Persons who shall violate a provision of this Code or shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the Fire Code Official, or of a permit or certificate used under provisions of this Code, shall be subject to code enforcement action by the City in accordance with Title 5 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code. Persons committing such violation shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1000 or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both fine and imprisonment, unless the violation is made an infraction by the prosecuting authority.

Page 55 of 233 ends

12 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
Section 112.4.2 is added to read as follows:
112.4.2 Abatement of Hazard. If any person fails to comply with the order of the Fire Department, or in the event the Fire Department is unable to locate the responsible person within a reasonable time, the Fire Department may take such steps to abate a fire hazard or health hazard as are necessary for the protection of the public health and safety. In no event is notice necessary before abatement when the fire hazard constitutes a clear and present danger to the public welfare. The cost of any such abatement is a debt to the City, of the owner of the premises or who, by his act or inaction, caused the fire hazard. The cost of the abatement shall become a lien on the premises when the need for the abatement and the amount of the cost have been established. It is the intent of this Section to provide a method of hazard abatement on private property where no owner or responsible person can be found and the hazard is of a nature requiring immediate action in order to protect the public.

Chapter 2 Definitions
Section 202 is amended to include the following definitions:

CORROSIVE LIQUID. Corrosive liquid is:
1) any liquid which, when in contact with living tissue, will cause destruction or irreversible alteration of such tissue by chemical action; or 2) any liquid having a pH of 2 or less or 12.5 or more; or 3) any liquid classified as corrosive by the U.S. Department of Transportation; or 4) any material exhibiting the characteristics of corrosivity in accordance with Title 22, California Code of Regulations §66261.22.

HEALTH HAZARD – OTHER. A hazardous material which affects target organs of the body, including but not limited to, those materials which produce liver damage, kidney damage, damage to the nervous system, act on the blood to decrease hemoglobin function, deprive the body tissue of oxygen or affect reproductive capabilities, including mutations (chromosomal damage), sensitizers or teratogens (effect on fetuses).

LARGE-SCALE FIRE TESTING. Testing a representative energy storage system that induces a significant fire into the device under test and evaluates whether the fire will spread to adjacent energy storage system units, surrounding equipment, or through an adjacent fire-resistance-rated barrier.

MODERATELY TOXIC GAS. A chemical or substance that has a median lethal concentration (LC50) in air more than 2000 parts per million but not more than 5000 parts per million by volume of gas or vapor, when administered by continuous inhalation for an hour, or less if death occurs within one hour, to albino rats weighing between 200 and 300 grams each.

SPILL CONTROL. That level of containment that is external to and separate from the primary containment and is capable of safely and securely containing the contents of

Page 56 of 233 ends

13 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
the largest container and prevents the materials from spreading to other parts of the room.

SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. Secondary containment is that level of containment that is external to and separate from primary containment and is capable of safely and securely containing the material, without discharge, for a period of time reasonably necessary to ensure detection and remedy of the primary containment failure.

WORKSTATION. A defined space or an independent principal piece of equipment using flammable or unstable (Class 3 or 4 as ranked by NFPA 704) hazardous materials where a specific function, laboratory procedure or research activity occurs. Approved or listed hazardous materials storage cabinets, flammable liquid storage cabinets or gas cabinets serving a workstation are included as part of the workstation. A workstation is allowed to contain ventilation equipment, fire protection devices, detection devices, electrical devices and other processing and scientific equipment.

Chapter 3 General Requirements
SECTION 316 HAZARDS TO FIREFIGHTERS
Section 316.7 is added to read as follows:
316.7 Roof Guardrails At Interior Courts. Roof openings into interior courts that are bounded on all sides by building walls shall be protected with guardrails. The top of the guardrail shall not be less than 42 inches in height above the adjacent roof surface that can be walked on. Intermediate rails shall be designed and spaced such that a 12-inch diameter sphere cannot pass through.

Exception:

Where the roof opening is greater than 600 square feet in area Chapter 5 Fire Service Features
SECTION 503 FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS
Section 503.1 is amended to read as follows:
503.1 Where required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Sections 503.1.1 through 503.1.3 and Santa Clara County Fire Department access road standards.

Section 503.1.1 is amended to read as follows:
503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with

Page 57 of 233 ends

14 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
the requirements for this section and shall extend to within 150 feet (45 720 mm) of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility.

Exceptions:

1. In other than R-3 or U occupancies, when the building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system, installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 the dimension may be increased to a maximum of 300 feet when approved by the fire code official.

2. When there are not more than two Group R-3 or accessory Group U occupancies, the dimension may be increased to a maximum of 200 feet.

3. When apparatus roads cannot be installed because of topography, waterways, nonnegotiable grades or other similar conditions, an approved alternative means of fire protection shall be provided.

Section 503.2.1 is amended to read as follows:
503.2.1 Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (6096 mm) for engines, and 26 feet (7925 mm) for aerial fire apparatus exclusive of shoulders, except for approved gates or barricades in accordance with Sections 503.5.1 and 503.6. The unobstructed vertical clearance shall be a minimum of 13 feet 6 inches (4115 mm), or as determined by the fire code official.

Exception:

When there are not more than two Group R, Division 3, or Group U parcels, the access road width may be modified by the fire code official.

Section 503.2.4 is amended to read as follows:
503.2.4 Turning radius. The required turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be a minimum of 30 feet (9144 mm) inside, and a minimum of 50 feet (15240 mm) outside.

Section 503.2.7 is amended to read as follows:
503.2.7 Grade. The maximum grade of a fire department apparatus access road shall not exceed 15-percent, unless approved by the fire code official.

Section 503.5 is amended to read as follows:
503.5 Required gates or barricades. The fire code official is authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across fire apparatus access roads, trails, or other accessways, not including the public streets, alleys, or highways. The minimum width for commercial applications is 20 feet (6096 mm), and 12 feet (4268 mm) for single-family dwellings. Electric gate operators, where

Page 58 of 233 ends

15 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
provided shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed, and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200.

Section 503.6 is amended to read as follows:
503.6 Security gates. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the fire code official. Where security gates are installed, they shall have an approved means of emergency operation. The security gates and the emergency operation shall be maintained operational at all times. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200. The minimum width for commercial applications is 20 feet (6096 mm), and 12 feet (4268 mm) for single-family dwellings.

SECTION 504 ACCESS TO BUILDINGS AND ROOFS
Section 504.5 is added to read as follows:
504.5 Access Control Devices. When access control devices including bars, grates, gates, electric or magnetic locks or similar devices, which would inhibit rapid fire department emergency access to or within the building are installed, such devices shall be approved by the fire code official. All electrically powered access control devices shall be provided with an approved means for deactivation or unlocking from a single location or otherwise approved by the fire code official.

Access control devices shall also comply with Chapter 10 Means of Egress.

SECTION 505 PREMISES IDENTIFICATION
Section 505.1 is amended to read as follows:
505.1 Address identification. New and existing buildings shall be provided with approved address identification. The address identification shall be legible and placed in a position that is visible from the street or road fronting the property. Address identification characters shall contrast with their background. Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall not be spelled out. Each character shall be not less than 6 inches (153 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 1/2 inch (12.7 mm). Where required by the fire code official, address identification shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure.

Address identification shall be maintained.

The following is a guideline for adequate address number dimensions:

Page 59 of 233 ends

16 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
• The number posted up to 49 feet from the public street shall be of one solid color which is contrasting to the background and be at least six (6) inches high with a half (½) inch stroke.
• The number posted from 50 to 100 feet from the public street shall be of one solid color which is contrasting to the background and be at least six (6) inches high with a one (1) inch stroke.
• The number posted over 100 to 199 feet from the public street shall be of one solid color which is contrasting to the background and be at least ten (10) inches high with a one and a half (1½) inch stroke.
• The number posted over 200 to 299 feet from the public street shall be of one solid color which is contrasting to the background and be at least ten (18) inches high with a one and a half (2) inch stroke.
• The number posted over 300 to 400 feet from the public street shall be of one solid color which is contrasting to the background and be at least ten (24) inches high with a one and a half (2½) inch stroke.

SECTION 510 EMERGENCY RESPONDER COMMUNICATION COVERAGE
Section 510.1 is amended to read as follows:
510.1 Emergency responder communication coverage in new buildings. Approved radio coverage for emergency responders shall be provided within all buildings meeting any one of the following conditions:

1. There are more than 3 stories above grade plane (as defined by the Building Code Section 202);

2. The total building area is 30,000 square feet or more;

3. The total basement area is 5,000 square feet or more;

4. Where required by the fire code official and radio coverage signal strength levels are not consistent with the minimum levels set forth in Section 510.4.1 Exceptions:

1. Where approved by the fire code official, a wired communication system in accordance with Section 907.2.12.2 shall be permitted to be installed or maintained in lieu of an approved radio coverage system.

2. Where it is determined by the fire code official that the radio coverage system is not needed.

3. In facilities where emergency responder radio coverage is required and such systems, components or equipment required could have a negative impact on the normal operations of that facility, the fire code official shall have the authority to accept an automatically activated emergency responder radio coverage system.

Page 60 of 233 ends

17 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5

4. Buildings and areas of buildings that have minimum radio coverage signal strength levels of the Silicon Valley Regional Interoperability Authority (SVRIA) P25 Phase 2 700 MHz Digital Trunked Radio System within the building in accordance with Section 510.4.1 without the use of an indoor radio coverage system.

The radio coverage system shall be installed and maintained in accordance with Sections 510.4 through 510.6.4 of this code and with the applicable provisions of NFPA 1221, Standard for the Installation, Maintenance and Use of Emergency Services Communications Systems.

The coverage shall be based upon the existing coverage levels of the public safety communication systems of the jurisdiction at the exterior of the building. This section shall not require improvement of the existing public safety communication systems.

Section 510.1.1 is added to read as follows:
510.1.1 Obstruction by new buildings. No obstruction of the public safety system backhaul shall be allowed without an approved mitigating plan.

Section 510.3 is amended to read as follows:
510.3 Permit required. A construction permit, for the installation of, or modification of, emergency responder radio coverage systems and related equipment is required as specified in Section 105.7.6. Maintenance performed in accordance with this code is not considered a modification and does not require a permit. A frequency change made to an existing system is considered to be new construction and will require a construction permit
Section 510.4 is amended to read as follows:
510.4 Technical requirements. Systems, components and equipment required to provide the emergency responder radio coverage system shall comply with the current Emergency Responders Radio Coverage Systems Standard Details & Specification enforced by the Santa Clara County Fire Department.

Section 510.4.1.1 is amended to read as follows:
510.4.1.1 Minimum signal strength into the building. The minimum inbound signal strength shall be sufficient to provide usable voice communications throughout the coverage area as specified by the fire code official. The inbound signal level shall be sufficient to provide not less than a Delivered Audio Quality (DAQ) of 3.0 for analog communications and DAQ of 3.4 for digital communications systems or an equivalent Signal-to-Interference-Plus-Noise Ratio (SINR) applicable to the technology.

Section 510.4.1.2 is amended to read as follows:

Page 61 of 233 ends

18 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
510.4.1.2 Minimum signal strength out of the building. The minimum outbound signal strength shall be sufficient to provide usable voice communications throughout the coverage area as specified by the fire code official. The outbound signal level shall be sufficient to provide not less than a DAQ of 3.0 for analog communications and DAQ of 3.4 for digital communications systems or an equivalent SINR applicable to the technology.

Section 510.5 is amended to read as follows:
510.5 Installation requirements. The installation of the emergency responder radio coverage system shall be in accordance with NFPA 1221 and the current Emergency Responder Radio Coverage Systems Standard Details & Specification enforced by the Santa Clara County Fire Department.

Section 510.5.2 is amended to read as follows:
510.5.2 Approval prior to installation. Amplification systems capable of operating on frequencies licensed to any public safety agency by the FCC or other radio licensing authority shall not be installed without prior coordination and approval of the fire code official and the agency FCC license holder or systems administrator.

The first paragraph of Section 510.5.4 is amended to read as follows:
510.5.4 Acceptance test procedure. Where an emergency responder radio coverage system is required, and upon completion of installation, the building owner shall have the radio system tested to verify that two-way coverage on each floor of the building is not less than 95 percent. Final system acceptance will require ERRCS power level and DAQ testing with agency FCC license holder, systems administrators, or designee.

Chapter 6 Building Services and Systems
SECTION 603 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, WIRING AND HAZARDS
Section 603.11 is added to read as follows:
603.11 Immersion Heaters. All electrical immersion heaters used in dip tanks, sinks, vats and similar operations shall be provided with approved over-temperature controls and low liquid level electrical disconnects. Manual reset of required protection devices shall be provided.

SECTION 605 FUEL-FIRED APPLIANCES
Section 605.5. is amended to read as follows:

Page 62 of 233 ends

19 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
605.5 Portable unvented heaters. Portable unvented fuel-fired heating equipment shall be prohibited in occupancies in Groups A, B, E, I, R-1, R-2, R2.1, R2.2, R-3, R3.1 and R-4 and ambulatory care facilities.

Exceptions:

1. Portable unvented fuel-fired heaters listed in accordance with UL 647 are permitted to be used in one and two-family dwellings, where operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

2. Portable outdoor gas-fired heating appliances in accordance with Section 605.5.2.

Section 605.5.2.1.1 is amended to read in entirety as follows, deleting the exception:
605.5.2.1.1 Prohibited locations. The storage or use of portable outdoor gas-fired heating appliances is prohibited in any of the following locations:

1. Inside of any occupancy where connected to the fuel gas container.

2. Inside of tents, canopies and membrane structures.

3. On exterior balconies. and rooftops.

Chapter 7 Fire and Smoke Protection Features
SECTION 703 Penetrations
Section 703.3 is added to read as follows:
703.3 Fire-resistant penetrations and joints. In high-rise buildings, in buildings assigned to Risk Category III or IV, or in fire areas containing Group R occupancies with an occupant load greater than 100, and other occupancies as determined necessary special inspections for through-penetrations, membrane penetration firestops, fire resistant joint systems and perimeter fire containment systems that are tested and listed in accordance with CBC Sections 714.4.1.2, 714.5.1.2, 715.3.1 and 715.4 shall be in accordance with Section 1705.18.1 or 1705.18.2.

Chapter 9 Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems
SECTION 901 GENERAL
Section 901.6.2 is amended to read as follows:
901.6.2 Integrated testing. Where two or more fire protection or life safety systems are interconnected, the intended response of subordinate fire protection and life safety systems shall be verified when required testing of the initiating system is conducted. In addition, integrated testing shall be performed in accordance with Sections 901.6.2.1 and 901.6.2.2.

Page 63 of 233 ends

20 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
901.6.2.1 High-rise buildings. For high-rise buildings, integrated testing shall comply with NFPA 4, with an integrated test performed prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy and at intervals not exceeding 10 years, unless otherwise specified by an integrated system test plan prepared in accordance with NFPA 4. If an equipment failure is detected during integrated testing, a repeat of the integrated test shall not be required, except as necessary to verify operation of fire protection or life safety functions that are initiated by equipment that was repaired or replaced. For existing buildings, the testing timeframe shall be specified by the integrated systems test plan prepared in accordance with NFPA 4 as approved by the fire code official.
901.6.2.2 Smoke control systems. Where a fire alarm system is integrated with a smoke control system as outlined in Section 909, integrated testing shall comply with NFPA 4, with an integrated test performed prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy and at intervals not exceeding 10 years, unless otherwise specified by an integrated system test plan prepared in accordance with NFPA 4. If an equipment failure is detected during integrated testing, a repeat of the integrated test shall not be required, except as necessary to verify operation of fire protection or life safety functions that are initiated by equipment that was repaired or replaced. For existing buildings, the testing timeframe shall be specified by the integrated systems test plan prepared in accordance with NFPA 4 as approved by the fire code official.

Section 901.6.3 is amended to read as follows:
901.6.3 Records. Records of all system inspections, tests and maintenance required by the referenced standard shall be maintained on the premises for a minimum of five years. See 907.7 & 907.8 for fire alarm system inspection, testing and maintenance documentation requirements.

SECTION 903 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
Section 903.2 is amended to read as follows:
903.2 Where required. Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new and existing buildings and structures shall be provided in the locations described in this Section or in Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.12 whichever is the more restrictive and Sections 903.2.14 through 903.2.21.

For the purposes of this section, firewalls and fire barriers used to separate building areas shall be constructed in accordance with the California Building Code and shall be without openings or penetrations.

1. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures, other than Group R occupancies, except as follows:
a. Buildings and structures not located in any Wildland-Urban Interface and not exceeding 1,200 square feet of fire area.

Page 64 of 233 ends

21 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
b. Buildings and structures located in any Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area and not exceeding 500 square feet of fire area.
c. Group S-2 or U occupancies, including photovoltaic support structures, used exclusively for vehicle parking which meet all of the following:
i. Noncombustible construction.
ii. Maximum 5,000 square feet in building area.
iii. Structure is open on not less than three (3) sides nor 75% of structure perimeter.
iv. Minimum of 10 feet separation from existing buildings, or similar structures, unless area is separated by fire walls complying with California Building Code 706.
d. Canopies, constructed in accordance with CBC 406.7.2, used exclusively for weather protection of vehicle fueling pads per CBC 406.7.1 and not exceeding 5,000 square feet of fire area.

2. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout all new buildings with a Group R fire area.

Exception: Accessory Dwelling Unit, provided that all of the following are met:
a. The unit meets the definition of an Accessory Dwelling Unit as defined in the Government Code Section 65852.2.
b. The existing primary residence does not have automatic fire sprinklers.

The construction of an ADU will not trigger requirements to add fire sprinklers in any existing primary dwelling or existing multifamily dwelling in accordance with Gov. Code 65852.2.

3. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in new manufactured homes (as defined in California Health and Safety Code Sections 18007 and 18009) and multifamily manufactured homes with two dwelling units (as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 18008.7) in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations.

4. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout existing buildings with a Group R fire area when additions are made causing the fire area to exceed 3,600 square feet.

Exception 1: Additions where all of the following are met:
a. Building addition does not exceed 500 square feet.
b. The resultant structure meets all water supply requirements of Chapter 5 and Appendix B of the 2022 California Fire Code.

Exception 2: The construction of an ADU will not trigger requirements to add fire sprinklers in any existing primary dwelling or existing multifamily dwelling in accordance with Gov. Code 65852.2.

Page 65 of 233 ends

22 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5

5. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout existing Group A, B, E, F, L, M, S and U buildings and structures, when additions are made that increase the fire area to more than 3,600 square feet or that create conditions described in Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.18.

6. Any change in the character of occupancy or in use of any building with a fire area equal to or greater than 3,600 square feet which, in the opinion of the fire code official or building official, would place the building into a more hazardous division of the same occupancy group or into a different group of occupancies and constitutes a greater degree of life safety1 or increased fire risk2, shall require the installation of an approved fire automatic fire sprinkler system.

However, the construction of an ADU will not trigger requirements to add fire sprinklers in any existing primary dwelling or existing multifamily dwelling in accordance with Gov. Code 65852.2.
1 Life Safety – Shall include, but not limited to: Increased occupant load, public assembly areas, public meeting areas, churches, indoor amusement attractions, buildings with complex exiting systems due to increased occupant loads, large schools/day-care facilities, large residential care facilities housing nonambulatory clients. 2 Fire Risks – Shall include, but not limited to: High-piled combustible storage, woodworking operations, hazardous operations using hazardous materials, increased fuel loads (storage of moderate to highly combustible materials), increased sources of ignition (welding, automotive repair with the use of flammable liquids and open flames).

Section 903.2.11.7 is added to read as follows:
903.2.11.7 Chemical Fume Hood Fire Protection.

Approved automatic fire extinguishing systems shall be provided in chemical fume hoods in the following cases:

1. Existing hoods having interiors with a flame spread index greater than 25 in which flammable liquids are handled.

2. If a hazard assessment determines that an automatic extinguishing system is required for the chemical fume hood, then the applicable automatic fire protection system standard shall be followed.

SECTION 907 FIRE ALARM AND DETECTION SYSTEMS
Section 907.8 is amended as follows:
907.8 Inspection, testing and maintenance. The maintenance and testing schedules and procedures for fire alarm and fire detection systems shall be in accordance with Sections 907.8.1 through 907.8.4 and NFPA 72. Records of inspection, testing and maintenance shall be documented using NFPA 72 record of inspection and testing

Page 66 of 233 ends

23 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
forms.

SECTION 909 SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS
Section 909.22.1 is amended as follows:
909.22.1 Schedule. A routine maintenance and operational testing program shall be initiated immediately after the smoke control system has passed the acceptance tests.

A written schedule for routine maintenance and operational testing shall be established and operational testing must occur at least annually.

Chapter 12 Energy Systems
SECTION 1202 DEFINITIONS
Section 1202.1.1 is amended to read as follows:
1202.1 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2:

BATTERY SYSTEM, STATIONARY STORAGE.

BATTERY TYPES.

CAPACITOR ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM.

CRITICAL CIRCUIT.

EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM.

ENERGY STORAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM (ESS).

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM, ELECTROCHEMICAL.

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM, MOBILE.

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM, WALK-IN UNIT.

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM CABINET.

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM COMMISSIONING.

ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM DECOMMISSIONING.

FUEL CELL POWER SYSTEM, STATIONARY.

LARGE-SCALE FIRE TESTING
PORTABLE GENERATOR.

STANDBY POWER SYSTEM.

SECTION 1207 ELECTRICAL ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS (ESS)
Section 1207.1.5 is amended to read as follows:
1207.1.5 Large-scale fire test. Where required elsewhere in Section 1207, large-scale fire testing shall be conducted in accordance with NFPA 855, and UL 9540A. The testing shall be conducted or witnessed and reported by an approved testing laboratory and show that a fire involving one ESS will not propagate to an adjacent ESS, and

Page 67 of 233 ends

24 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
where installed within buildings, enclosed areas and walk-in units will be contained within the room, enclosed area or walk-in unit for a duration equal to the fire-resistance rating of the room separation specified in Section 1207.7.4. The test report shall be provided to the fire code official for review and approval in accordance with Section 104.8.2.

Section 1207.2.2.1 is amended to read as follows:
1207.2.2.1 Ongoing inspection and testing. Systems that monitor and protect the ESS installation shall be inspected and tested in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and the operation and maintenance manual. Inspection and testing records shall be maintained in the operation and maintenance manual and made available to the fire code official upon request.

Section 1207.5.2 is amended to read as follows:
1207.5.2 Maximum allowable quantities. Fire areas within rooms, areas and walk-in units containing electrochemical ESS shall not exceed the maximum allowable quantities in Table 1207.5. The allowable number of fire areas, maximum allowable quantity, and fire-resistance rating of fire-barriers shall comply with Table 1207.5.1.

Exceptions:

Where approved by the fire code official, rooms, areas and walk-in units containing electrochemical ESS that exceed the amounts in Table 1207.5 shall be permitted based on a hazardous mitigation analysis in accordance with Section 1207.1.4 and large-scale fire testing complying with Section 1207.1.5.

1. Lead-acid and nickel-cadmium battery systems installed in facilities under the exclusive control of communications utilities and operating at less than 50 VAC and 60 VDC in accordance with NFPA 76.

2. Dedicated-use buildings in compliance with Section 1207.7.1.

TABLE 1207.5.1

DESIGN AND NUMBER OF ESS FIRE AREAS

STORY PERCENTAGE

OF MAXIMUM

ALLOWABLE

QUANTITY

PER FIRE
AREA
NUMBER

OF FIRE
AREAS
PER
STORY
FIRERESISTANCE

RATING FOR
FIRE

BARRIERS IN
HOURS
Above grade
plan
Higher than 9
7-9
6 5
4 25
50 50
50 75
1 2
2 2
4 3
2 2
2 2

Page 68 of 233 ends

25 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
3 2
1 100
100
100
6 6
6 2
2 2
Below grade
plan
1 2
Lower than 2
100
50 Not Allowed
4 2
Not Allowed
3 3
Not Allowed
Section 1207.5.5 is amended to read as follows:
1207.5.5 Fire suppression systems. Rooms and areas within buildings and walk-in units containing electrochemical ESS shall be protected by an automatic fire suppression system designed and installed in accordance with one of the following:

1. An automatic sprinkler system designed and installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 with a minimum density of 0.3 gpm/ft2 (1.14 L/min) based on the fire area or 2,500 square-foot (232 m2) design area, whichever is larger.

2. Where approved, an automatic sprinkler system designed and installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 with a sprinkler hazard classification based on large-scale fire testing complying with Section 1207.1.5.

3. The following alternative automatic fire-extinguishing systems designed and installed in accordance with Section 904, provided that the installation is approved by the fire code official based on large-scale fire testing complying with Section 1207.1.5:

3.1. NFPA 12, Standard on Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems.

3.2. NFPA 15, Standard for Water Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection.

3.3. NFPA 750, Standard on Water Mist Fire Protection Systems.

3.4. NFPA 2001, Standard on Clean Agent Fire-Extinguishing Systems.

3.5. NFPA 2010, Standard for Fixed Aerosol Fire-Extinguishing Systems.

Exception: Fire suppression systems for lead-acid and nickel-cadmium battery systems at facilities under the exclusive control of communications utilities that operate at less than 50 VAC and 60 VDC shall be provided where required by NFPA 76.

Section 1207.11.3 is amended to read as follows:
1207.11.3 Location. ESS shall be installed only in the following locations:

1. Detached garages and detached accessory structures.

Page 69 of 233 ends

26 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5

2. Attached garages separated from the dwelling unit living space and sleeping units in accordance with Section R302.6.

3. Outdoors or on the exterior side of the exterior walls not less than 3 feet (914 mm) from doors and windows directly entering the dwelling unit and not below or above any emergency escape and rescue openings.

4. Enclosed utility closets, basements, storage or utility spaces within dwelling units with finished or noncombustible walls and ceilings. Walls and ceilings of unfinished wood-framed construction shall be provided with not less than 5/8- inch (15.9 mm) Type X gypsum wallboard.

5. ESS shall not be installed in sleeping rooms, closets, spaces opening directly into sleeping rooms or in habitable spaces of dwelling units.

Section 1207.11.6 is amended to read as follows:
1207.11.6 Fire detection. ESS installed in Group R-3 and R-4 occupancies shall comply with the following:

1. Rooms and areas within dwellings units, sleeping units, basements and attached garages in which ESS are installed shall be protected by smoke alarms in accordance with Section 907.2.11.

2. A listed heat alarm interconnected to the smoke alarms shall be installed in locations within dwelling units, sleeping units and attached garages where smoke alarms cannot be installed based on their listing.

Exceptions:

1. A listed heat detector may be used in place of a heat alarm, so long as it is interconnected with devices that provide an audible alarm at all sleeping areas.

2. A fire sprinkler associated with an approved automatic sprinkler system that triggers an audible alarm upon activation of the waterflow switch, may be used in place of a heat alarm.

Chapter 33 Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition SECTION 3305 PRECAUTIONS AGAINST FIRE
Section 3305.5 is amended to read as follows:
3305.5 Fire watch. Where required by the fire code official or the site safety plan established in accordance with Section 3303.1, a fire watch shall be provided for

Page 70 of 233 ends

27 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
building demolition and for building construction. Fire watch is not intended to facilitate occupancy during ongoing construction in a new building.

Section 3305.10 is added to read as follows:
3305.10 Fire Walls. When firewalls are required in combustible construction, the wall construction shall be completed (with all openings protected) immediately after the building is sufficiently weather-protected at the location of the wall(s).

SECTION 3311 ACCESS FOR FIRE FIGHTING
Section 3311.1 is amended to read as follows:
3311.1 Required access. Approved vehicle access for firefighting shall be provided to all construction or demolition sites. Vehicle access shall be provided to within 100 feet (30 480 mm) of temporary or permanent fire department connections. Vehicle access shall be provided by either temporary or permanent roads, capable of supporting vehicle loading under all weather conditions. Vehicle access shall be maintained until permanent fire apparatus access roads are available.

Section 3311.1.1 is added to read as follows:
3311.1.1 Fire Department Access Roadways: All construction sites shall be accessible by fire department apparatus by means of roadways having an all-weather driving service of not less than 20ft. of unobstructed width. The roads shall have the ability to withstand the live loads of fire apparatus, and have a minimum 13ft. 6 in. of vertical clearance. Dead end fire access roads in excess of 150 ft. in length shall be provided with approved turnarounds.

When approved by the Fire Code Official, temporary access roadways may be utilized until such time that the permanent roadways are installed. As a minimum, the roadway shall consist of a compacted sub base and six (6) inches of road base material (Class 2 aggregate base rock) both compacted to a minimum 95% and sealed.

The perimeter edges of the roadway shall be contained and delineated by curb and gutter or other approved method. The use of geotextile reinforcing fabric underlayment or soils lime-treatment may be required if so determined by the project civil engineer.

Provisions for surface drainage shall also be provided where necessary. The integrity of the roadway shall be maintained at all times.

SECTION 3312 MEANS OF EGRESS
Section 3312.1 is amended to read as follows:
3312.1 Stairways Required. Each level above the first story in new multi-story buildings that require two exit stairways shall be provided with at least two usable exit stairways after the floor decking is installed. Exit stairs in new and in existing, occupied

Page 71 of 233 ends

28 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
buildings shall be lighted and maintained clear of debris and construction materials at all times.

Exception: For new multi-story buildings, one of the required exit stairs may be obstructed on not more than two contiguous floor levels for the purposes of stairway construction (i.e., installation of gypsum board, painting, flooring, etc.).

Section 3312.1.1 is added to read as follows:

Section 3312.1.1 Required Means of Egress. All new buildings under construction shall have at least one unobstructed means of egress. All means of egress shall be identified in the written fire safety plan as required by Section 3303.1.

SECTION 3315 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
Section 3315.1 is amended to read as follows:
3315.1 Completion before occupancy. In buildings where an automatic sprinkler system is required by this code or the California Building Code, it shall be unlawful to occupy any portion of a building or structure until the automatic sprinkler system installation has been tested and approved.

In new buildings of combustible construction where, automatic fire sprinkler systems are required to be installed, the system shall be placed in service as soon as possible.

Immediately upon the completion of sprinkler pipe installation on each floor level, the piping shall be hydrostatically tested and inspected. After inspection approval from the Fire department, each floor level of sprinkler piping shall be connected to the system supply riser and placed into service with all sprinkler heads uncovered. Protective caps may be installed on the active sprinklers during the installation of drywall, texturing and painting, but shall be removed immediately after this work is completed. For system activation notification, an exterior audible waterflow alarm shall bell can be installed and connected to the sprinkler waterflow device prior to installation of the monitoring system.

For buildings equipped with fire sprinkler systems that are undergoing alterations, the sprinkler system(s) shall remain in service at all times except when system modifications are necessary. Fire sprinkler systems undergoing modifications shall be returned to service at the end of each workday unless otherwise approved by the fire department. The general contractor or his/her designee shall check the sprinkler control valve(s) at the end of each workday to confirm that the system has been restored to service.

Chapter 49 Requirements for Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Areas SECTION 4901 GENERAL

Page 72 of 233 ends

29 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
Section 4901.3 is added to read in entirety as follows:
4901.3 Where applicable.

These requirements shall apply to all areas within the City of Monte Sereno as set forth and delineated on the map entitled "Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area" which map and all notations, references, data and other information shown thereon are hereby adopted and made a part of this Chapter. The map shall be on file in the Office of the City of Monte Sereno.

These requirements shall not apply where otherwise prohibited by law, or to any land or water areas acquired or managed for one or more of the following purposes or uses:

1. Habitat for endangered or threatened species, or any species that is a candidate for listing as an endangered or threatened species by the state or federal government.

2. Lands kept in a predominantly natural state as habitat for wildlife, plant, or animal communities.

3. Open space lands that are environmentally sensitive parklands.

4. Other lands having scenic values, as declared by the local agency, or by state or federal law.

SECTION 4906 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT
Section 4906.1.1 is added to read as follows:
4906.1.1 Hazardous vegetation and fuels shall be managed to reduce the severity of potential exterior wildfire exposure to buildings, to reduce the risk of fire spreading to buildings, and provide for safe access for emergency wildland fire equipment and civilian evacuation concurrently, as required by applicable laws and standards.

Section 4906.1.2 is added to read as follows:
4906.1.2 Maintenance required.

Maintenance is required to ensure conformance with these standards and measures, and to assure continued availability, access, and utilization, of the defensible space during a wildfire.

Section 4906.1.3 is added to read as follows:
4906.1.3 Additional measures.

No person subject to these regulations shall permit any fire hazard, as defined in this chapter, to exist on premises under their control, or fail to take immediate action to abate a fire hazard when requested to do so by the enforcing agency.

Section 4906.1.4 is added to read as follows:

Page 73 of 233 ends

30 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
4906.1.4 Public Property.

For the purposes of this chapter, vegetation removal or management, undertaken in whole or in part, for fire prevention or suppression purposes shall not be deemed to alter the natural condition of public property.

SECTION 4907 DEFENSIBLE SPACE
Section 4907.3 is amended to read as follows:
4907.3 Requirements. Hazardous vegetation and fuels around all buildings, roads, driveways, and structures shall be maintained in accordance with the following laws and regulations:

1. Public Resources Code, Sections 4291 through 4296.

2. Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 1299.03.

3. California Government Code, Sections 51175 - 51189.

4. California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 7, Subchapter 1, Section 3.07.

5. Any local ordinance of the City of Monte Sereno.

Chapter 50 Hazardous Materials – General Provisions
SECTION 5001 GENERAL
Section 5001.2.2.2 is amended to read as follows:
5001.2.2.2 Health Hazards The material categories listed in this section are classified as health hazards. A material with a primary classification as a health hazard can also pose a physical hazard.

1. Highly toxic and toxic materials.

2. Corrosive materials.

3. Moderately toxic gas.

4. Health hazard - Other.

SECTION 5002 DEFINITIONS
Section 5002.1 is amended to read:
5002.1 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2:

BOILING POINT.

CEILING LIMIT.

Page 74 of 233 ends

31 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
CHEMICAL.

CHEMICAL NAME.

CLOSED CONTAINER.

CONTAINER.

CONTROL AREA.

CYLINDER.

DAY BOX.

DEFLAGRATION.

DESIGN PRESSURE.

DETACHED BUILDING.

DISPENSING.

EXCESS FLOW CONTROL.

EXHAUSTED ENCLOSURE.

EXPLOSION.

FLAMMABLE VAPORS OR FUMES.

GAS CABINET.

GAS ROOM.

HANDLING.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.

HEALTH HAZARD.

HEALTH HAZARD – OTHER.

IMMEDIATELY DANGEROUS TO LIFE AND
HEALTH (IDLH).

INCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS.

LIQUID.

LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT (LEL).

LOWER FLAMMABLE LIMIT (LFL).

MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE QUANTITY PER CONTROL AREA.

MODERATELY TOXIC GAS.

NORMAL TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE (NTP).

OUTDOOR CONTROL AREA.

PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE LIMIT (PEL).

PESTICIDE.

PHYSICAL HAZARD.

PRESSURE VESSEL.

SAFETY CAN.

SAFETY DATA SHEET (SDS).

SECONDARY CONTAINMENT.

SEGREGATED.

SOLID.

SPILL CONTROL.

STORAGE, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.

SYSTEM.

TANK, ATMOSPHERIC.

TANK, PORTABLE.

TANK, STATIONARY.

Page 75 of 233 ends

32 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
TANK VEHICLE.

UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE.

USE (MATERIAL).

VAPOR PRESSURE.

SECTION 5003 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Section 5003.1.3.1 is added to read as follows:
5003.1.3.1 Toxic, Highly Toxic, Moderately Toxic Gases and Similarly Used or Handled Materials. The storage, use and handling of toxic, highly toxic and moderately toxic gases in amounts exceeding Table 6004.2.1.4 shall be in accordance with this chapter and Chapter 60. Any toxic, highly toxic or moderately toxic material that is used or handled as a gas or vapor shall be in accordance with the requirements for toxic, highly toxic or moderately toxic gases.

Section 5003.1.5 is added to read as follows:
5003.1.5 Health Hazards - Other. The storage, use and handling of materials classified as other health hazards including carcinogens, irritants and sensitizers in amounts exceeding 810 cubic feet for gases, 55 gallons for liquids and 5,000 pounds for solids shall be in accordance with Section 5003.

Section 5003.1.6 is added to read as follows:
5003.1.6 Additional Spill Control and Secondary Containment Requirements. In addition to the requirements set forth in Section 5004.2. An approved containment system is required for any quantity of hazardous materials that are liquids or solids at normal temperature, and pressure (NTP) where a spill is determined to be a plausible event and where such an event would endanger people, property or the environment.

The approved containment system may be required to include a combination of spill control and secondary containment meeting the design and construction requirements set forth in Section 5004.2.

Section 5003.2.2.1 is amended to read as follows:
5003.2.2.1 Design and Construction. Piping, tubing, valves, fittings and related components used for hazardous materials shall be in accordance with the following:

1. Piping, tubing, valves, fittings and related components shall be designed and fabricated from materials that are compatible with the material to be contained and shall be of adequate strength and durability to withstand the pressure, structural and seismic stress, and exposure to which they are subject.

Page 76 of 233 ends

33 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5

2. Piping and tubing shall be identified in accordance with ASME A13.1 and the Santa Clara County Fire Chiefs Marking Requirements and Guidelines for Hazardous Materials and Hazardous Waste to indicate the material conveyed.

3. Manual valves or automatic remotely activated fail-safe emergency shutoff valves shall be installed on supply piping and tubing and provided with ready access at the following locations:

3.1. The point of use.

3.2. The tank, cylinder or bulk source.

4. Manual emergency shutoff valves and controls for remotely activated emergency shutoff valves shall be clearly visible, provided with ready access and identified in an approved manner.

5. Backflow prevention or check valves shall be provided where the backflow of hazardous materials could create a hazardous condition or cause the unauthorized discharge of hazardous materials.

6. Where gases or liquids having a hazard ranking of:

Health hazard Class 3 or 4
Flammability Class 4
Reactivity Class 4
in accordance with NFPA 704 are carried in pressurized piping above 15 pounds per square inch gauge (psig)(103 Kpa), an approved means of leak detection, emergency shutoff or excess flow control shall be provided. Where the piping originates from within a hazardous material storage room or area, the excess flow control shall be located within the storage room or area. Where the piping originates from a bulk source, the excess flow control shall be located as close to the bulk source as practical.

Exceptions:

1. Piping for inlet connections designed to prevent backflow.

2. Piping for pressure relief devices.

7. Secondary containment or equivalent protection from spills or leaks shall be provided for piping for liquid hazardous materials and for highly toxic and toxic corrosive gases above threshold quantities listed in Table 6004.2.1.4. Secondary containment includes, but is not limited to double-walled piping.

Exceptions:

1. Secondary containment is not required for toxic corrosive gases if the piping is constructed of inert materials.

2. Piping under sub-atmospheric conditions if the piping is equipped with an alarm and fail-safe-to-close valve activated by a loss of vacuum.

Page 77 of 233 ends

34 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5

8. Expansion chambers shall be provided between valves whenever the regulated gas may be subjected to thermal expansion. Chambers shall be sized to provide protection for piping and instrumentation and to accommodate the expansion of regulated materials.

Section 5003.2.2.2 is amended to read as follows:
5003.2.2.2 Additional Regulation for Supply Piping for Health Hazard Materials.

Supply piping and tubing for gases and liquids having a health hazard ranking of 3 or 4 shall be in accordance with ASME B31.3 and the following:

8.1. Piping and tubing utilized for the transmission of highly toxic, toxic, or highly volatile corrosive liquids and gases shall have welded or brazed connections throughout except for connections within an exhausted enclosure if the material is a gas, or an approved method of drainage or containment is provided for connections if the material is a liquid.

8.2. Piping and tubing shall not be located within corridors, within any portion of a means of egress required to be enclosed in fire-resistance-rated construction or in concealed spaces in areas not classified as Group H Occupancies.

8.3. All primary piping for toxic, highly toxic and moderately toxic gases shall pass a helium leak test of 1x10-9 cubic centimeters/second where practical, or shall pass testing in accordance with an approved, nationally recognized standard. Tests shall be conducted by a qualified "third party" not involved with the construction of the piping and control systems.

EXCEPTION:

Piping and tubing within the space defined by the walls of corridors and the floor or roof above or in concealed spaces above other occupancies where installed in accordance with Section 415.11.7.4 of the California Building Code for Group H5 occupancies.

Section 5003.5.2 is added to read as follows:
5003.5.2 Ventilation Ducting. Ducts venting hazardous materials operations shall be labeled with the hazard class of the material being vented and the direction of flow.

Section 5003.5.3 is added to read as follows:
5003.5.3 “H" Occupancies. In "H" occupancies, all piping and tubing may be required to be identified when there is any possibility of confusion with hazardous materials transport tubing or piping. Flow direction indicators are required.

Section 5003.10.4 is amended to read as follows:

Page 78 of 233 ends

35 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
5003.10.4 Elevators utilized to transport hazardous materials. 5003.10.4.1 When transporting hazardous materials, elevators shall have no other passengers other than the individual(s) handling the chemical transport cart.
5003.10.4.1.1 When transporting cryogenic or liquefied compressed gases, there shall be no occupants in the elevator.
5003.10.4.2 Hazardous materials liquid containers shall have a maximum capacity of 20 liters (5.28 gal).
5003.10.4.3 Toxic, moderately toxic, and highly-toxic gases shall be limited to a container of a maximum water capacity of 1 pound.
5003.10.4.4 When transporting cryogenic or liquefied compressed gases, means shall be provided to prevent the elevator from being summoned to other floors.

SECTION 5004 STORAGE
Section 5004.2.1 is amended to read as follows:
5004.2.1 Spill Control for Hazardous Material Liquids. Rooms, buildings or areas used for storage of hazardous material liquids shall be provided with spill control to prevent the flow of liquids to adjoining areas. Floors in indoor locations and similar surfaces in outdoor locations shall be constructed to contain a spill from the largest single vessel by one of the following methods:

1. Liquid-tight sloped or recessed floors in indoor locations or similar areas in outdoor locations.

2. Liquid-tight floors in indoor and outdoor locations or similar areas provided with liquid-tight raised or recessed sills or dikes.

3. Sumps and collection systems

4. Other approved engineered systems.

Except for surfacing, the floors, sills, dikes, sumps and collection systems shall be constructed of noncombustible material, and the liquid-tight seal shall be compatible with the material stored. When liquid-tight sills or dikes are provided, they are not required at perimeter openings having an open-grate trench across the opening that connects to an approved collection system.

Section 5004.2.2.2 is amended to read as follows:
5004.2.2.2 Incompatible Materials. Incompatible materials shall be separated from each other in independent secondary containment systems.

Page 79 of 233 ends

36 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
Chapter 54 Corrosive Materials
SECTION 5402 DEFINITION
Section 5402.1 is amended to read as follows:
5402.1 Definition. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2:

CORROSIVE.

CORROSIVE LIQUIDS.

Chapter 56 Explosives and Fireworks
SECTION 5601 GENERAL
Section 5601.1.3 is amended to read:
5601.1.3 Fireworks. The possession, manufacture, storage, sale, handling, and use of fireworks, including those fireworks classified as Safe and Sane by the California State Fire Marshal, are prohibited.

Exception: The use of fireworks for fireworks displays as allowed in Section 5608
Chapter 57 Flammable and Combustible Liquids
SECTION 5704 STORAGE
Section 5704.2.7.5.8 is amended to read as follows:
5704.2.7.5.8 Overfill Prevention. An approved means or method in accordance with Section 5704.2.9.7.5 shall be provided to prevent the overfill of all Class I, II and IIIA liquid storage tanks. Storage tanks in refineries, bulk plants or terminals regulated by Sections 5706.4 or 5706.7 shall have overfill protection in accordance with API 2350.

Exception: Outside aboveground tanks with a capacity of 1320 gallons (5000 L) or less need only comply with Section 5704.2.9.7.5 (Item 1, Sub-item 1.1).

An approved means or method in accordance with Section 5704.2.9.7.5 shall be provided to prevent the overfilling of Class IIIB liquid storage tanks connected to fuelburning equipment inside buildings.

Section 5704.2.7.5.9 is added to read as follows:

Page 80 of 233 ends

37 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
5704.2.7.5.9 Automatic Filling of Tanks. Systems that automatically fill flammable or combustible liquid tanks shall be equipped with overfill protection, approved by the fire code official that sends an alarm signal to a constantly attended location and immediately stops the filling of the tank. The alarm signal and automatic shutoff shall be tested on an annual basis and records of such testing shall be maintained on-site for a period of five (5) years.

SECTION 5707 ON-DEMAND MOBILE FUELING OPERATIONS
Section 5707.3.3 is amended to read as follows:
5707.3.3 Site plan.

A site plan shall be developed for each location or area at which mobile fueling occurs.

The site plan shall be in sufficient detail to indicate the following:

1. All buildings and structures.

2. Lot lines or property lines.

3. Electric car chargers.

4. Solar photovoltaic parking lot canopies.

5. Appurtenances on-site and their use or function.

6. All uses adjacent to the lot lines of the site.

7. Fueling locations.

8. Locations of all storm drain openings and adjacent waterways or wetlands.

9. Information regarding slope, natural drainage, curbing and impounding.

10. How a spill will be kept on the site property.

11. Scale of the site plan.

Chapter 58 Flammable Gases and Flammable Cryogenic Fluids SECTION 5809 MOBILE GASEOUS FUELING OF HYDROGEN-FUELED VEHICLES Section 5809.3.4 is amended to read as follows:
5809.3.4 Site plan. For other than emergency roadside services, a site plan shall be developed for each location at which mobile gaseous hydrogen fueling occurs. The site plan shall be in sufficient detail to indicate; all buildings, structures, lot lines, property lines and appurtenances onsite and their use and function, and the scale of the site plan.

Chapter 60 Highly Toxic and Toxic Materials
Chapter 60 of the 2022 California Fire Code and 2021 International Code is amended as follows:

Page 81 of 233 ends

38 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
SECTION 6001 GENERAL
Section 6001.1 is amended to read as follows:
6001.1 Scope.

The storage and use of highly toxic, toxic and moderately toxic materials shall comply with this chapter. Compressed gases shall also comply with Chapter 53.

Exceptions:

1. Display and storage in Group M and storage in Group S occupancies complying with Section 5003.11.

2. Conditions involving pesticides or agricultural products as follows:

2.1 Application and release of pesticide, agricultural products and materials intended for use in weed abatement, erosion control, soil amendment or similar applications when applied in accordance with the manufacturer’s instruction and label directions.

2.2 Transportation of pesticides in compliance with the Federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Act and regulations
thereunder.

2.3 Storage in dwellings or private garages of pesticides registered by the US Environmental Protection Agency to be utilized in and around the home, garden, pool, spa and patio.

SECTION 6004 HIGHLY TOXIC AND TOXIC COMPRESSED GASES
Section 6004.1 is amended to read as follows:
6004.1 General.

The storage and use of highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic compressed gases shall comply with this section.
6004.1.1 Special limitations for indoor storage and use by occupancy. The indoor storage and use of highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic compressed gases in certain occupancies shall be subject to the limitations contained in Sections 6004.1.1.1 through 6004.1.1.3.
6004.1.1.1 Group A, E, I or U occupancies. Moderately toxic, toxic and highly toxic compressed gases shall not be stored or used within Group A, E, I or U occupancies.

Exception: Cylinders not exceeding 20 cubic feet (0.566 m3) at normal temperature and pressure (NTP) are allowed within gas

Page 82 of 233 ends

39 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
cabinets or fume hoods.
6004.1.1.2 Group R occupancies. Moderately toxic, toxic, and highly toxic compressed gases shall not be stored or used in Group R occupancies.
6004.1.1.3 Offices, retail sales and classrooms. Moderately toxic, toxic and highly toxic compressed gases shall not be stored or used in offices, retail sales or classroom portions of Group B, F, M or S occupancies.

Exception: In classrooms of Group B occupancies, cylinders with a capacity not exceeding 20 cubic feet (0.566 m3) at NTP are allowed in gas cabinets or fume hoods.

Section 6004.2 is amended to read as follows:
6004.2 Indoor storage and use.

The indoor storage and use of highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic compressed gases shall be in accordance with Sections 6004.2.1 through 6004.2.2.10.3.

Section 6004.2.1 is amended to read as follows:
6004.2.1 Applicability. The applicability of regulations governing the indoor storage and use of highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic compressed gases shall be as set forth in Sections 6004.2.1.1 through 6004.2.1.4.

Section 6004.2.1.4 is added to read as follows:
6004.2.1.4 Quantities exceeding the minimum threshold quantities but not exceeding the maximum allowable quantities per control area. The indoor storage or use of highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic gases in amounts exceeding the minimum threshold quantities per control area set forth in Table 6004.2.1.4 but not exceeding maximum allowable quantity per control area set forth in Table 5003.1.1(2) shall be in accordance with Sections 5001, 5003, 6001, 6004.1, and 6004.4 Table 6004.2.1.4
Minimum Threshold Quantities for Highly Toxic, Toxic and Moderately Toxic Gases for Indoor Storage and Use
Highly Toxic 20
Toxic 405 cubic feet
Moderately Toxic 405 cubic feet
Section 6004.4 is added to read as follows:

Page 83 of 233 ends

40 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
6004.4. General indoor requirements. The general requirements applicable to the indoor storage and use of highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic compressed gases shall be in accordance with Sections 6004.4 through 6004.4.8.2 6004.4.1 Cylinder and tank location. Cylinders shall be located within gas cabinets, exhausted enclosures or gas rooms. Portable and stationary tanks shall be located within gas rooms or exhausted enclosures.

Exceptions:

1. Where a gas detection system is provided in accordance with 6004.4.8 6004.4.2. Ventilated areas. The room or area in which gas cabinets or exhausted enclosures are located shall be provided with exhaust ventilation. Gas cabinets or exhausted enclosures shall not be used as the sole means of exhaust for any room or area.
6004.4.3. Piping and controls. In addition to the requirements of Section 5003.2.2, piping and controls on stationary tanks, portable tanks, and cylinders shall comply with the following requirements:

1. Stationary tanks, portable tanks, and cylinders in use shall be provided with a means of excess flow control on all tank and cylinder inlet or outlet connections.

Exceptions:

1. Inlet connections designed to prevent backflow.

2. Pressure relief devices.
6004.4.4 Gas rooms. Gas rooms shall comply with Section 5003.8.4 and both of the following requirements:

1. The exhaust ventilation from gas rooms shall be directed to an exhaust system.

2. Gas rooms shall be equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system. Alternative fire- extinguishing systems shall not be used. 6004.4.5 Treatment systems. The exhaust ventilation from gas cabinets, exhausted enclosures and gas rooms, required in Section 6004.4.1 shall be directed to a treatment system. The treatment system shall be utilized to handle the accidental release of gas and to process exhaust ventilation. The treatment system shall be designed in accordance with Sections 6004.2.2.7.1 through 6004.2.2.7.5 and Chapter 5 of the California Mechanical Code.

Exceptions:

Page 84 of 233 ends

41 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5

1. Highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic gases—storage. A treatment system is not required for cylinders, containers and tanks in storage where all of the following controls are provided:

1.1Valve outlets are equipped with gas- tight outlet plugs or caps.

1.2Hand wheel-operated valves have handles secured to prevent movement.

1.3Approved containment vessels or containment systems are provided in accordance with Section 6004.2.2.3.

2. Highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic gases —use. Treatment systems are not required for highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic gases supplied by stationary tanks, portable tanks, or cylinders where a gas detection system complying with Section 6004.4.8 and listed or approved automatic-closing fail- safe valves are provided. The gas detection system shall have a sensing interval not exceeding 5 minutes. Automatic-closing fail- safe valves shall be located immediately adjacent to cylinder valves and shall close when gas is detected at the permissible exposure limit (PEL) by a gas sensor monitoring the exhaust system at the point of discharge from the gas cabinet, exhausted enclosure, ventilated enclosure or gas room.
6004.4.5.1. Design. Treatment systems shall be capable of diluting, adsorbing, absorbing, containing, neutralizing, burning or otherwise processing the contents of the largest single vessel of compressed gas.

Where a total containment system is used, the system shall be designed to handle the maximum anticipated pressure of release to the system when it reaches equilibrium.
6004.4.5.2. Performance. Treatment systems shall be designed to reduce the maximum allowable dis- charge concentrations of the gas to one-half immediate by dangerous to life and health (IDLH) at the point of discharge to the atmosphere. Where more than one gas is emitted to the treatment system, the treatment system shall be designed to handle the worst-case release based on the release rate, the quantity and the IDLH for all compressed gases stored or used.
6004.4.5.3. Sizing. Treatment systems shall be sized to process the maximum worst-case release of gas based on the maximum flow rate of release from the largest vessel utilized. The entire contents of the largest compressed gas vessel shall be considered.
6004.4.5.4 Stationary tanks. Stationary tanks shall be labeled with the maximum rate of release for the compressed gas contained based on valves or fittings that are inserted directly into the tank. Where multiple valves or fittings are provided, the maximum flow rate of release for valves or fittings

Page 85 of 233 ends

42 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
with the highest flow rate shall be indicated. Where liquefied compressed gases are in contact with valves or fittings, the liquid flow rate shall be utilized for computation purposes. Flow rates indicated on the label shall be converted to cubic feet per minute (cfm/min) (m3/s) of gas at normal temperature and pressure (NTP).
6004.4.5.5 Portable tanks and cylinders. The maximum flow rate of release for portable tanks and cylinders shall be calculated based on the total release from the cylinder or tank within the time specified in Table 6004.2.2.7.5.

Where portable tanks or cylinders are equipped with approved excess flow or reduced flow valves, the worst-case release shall be determined by the maximum achievable flow from the valve as determined by the valve manufacturer or compressed gas supplier. Reduced flow and excess flow valves shall be permanently marked by the valve manufacturer to indicate the maximum design flow rate. Such markings shall indicate the flow rate for air under normal temperature and pressure.
6004.4.6. Emergency power. Emergency power shall be provided for the following systems in accordance with Section 604:

1. Exhaust ventilation system.

2. Treatment system.

3. Gas detection system.

4. Smoke detection system.
6004.4.6.1. Fail-safe systems. Emergency power shall not be required for mechanical exhaust ventilation and treatment systems where approved failsafe systems are installed and designed to stop gas flow. 6004.4.7. Automatic fire detection system. An approved automatic fire detection system shall be installed in rooms or areas where highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic compressed gases are stored or used. Activation of the detection system shall sound a local alarm. The fire detection system shall comply with Section 907.
6004.4.8. Gas detection system. A gas detection system complying with Section 916 shall be provided to detect the presence of gas at or below the PEL or ceiling limit of the gas for which detection is provided.

Exceptions:

1. A gas detection system is not required for toxic and moderately toxic gases when the physiological warning threshold level for the gas is at a level below the accepted PEL for the gas.

Page 86 of 233 ends

43 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5

2. A gas detection system is not required for highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic gases where cylinders, portable tanks, and all noncontinuously welded connects are within a gas cabinet or exhausted enclosures.
6004.4.8.1. Alarms. The gas detection system shall initiate a local alarm and transmit a signal to an approved location.
6004.4.8.2. Shut off of gas supply. The gas detection system shall automatically close the shut off valve at the source on gas supply piping and tubing related to the system being monitored for whichever gas is detected.

Exception: Automatic shutdown is not required for highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic compressed gas systems where all of the following controls are provided:

1. Constantly attended / supervised.

2. Provided with emergency shutoff valves that have
ready access.

Chapter 61 Liquefied Petroleum Gases
SECTION 6104 LOCATION OF LP-GAS CONTAINERS
Section 6104.2 is amended to read as follows:
6104.2 Maximum capacity within established limits. Within The limits referred to in Section 6104.2 of the California Fire Code, in which storage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is restricted, are hereby established as follows:

Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) shall not be permitted within the City of Monte Sereno where natural gas mains exist.

Exceptions:

1. Where LPG is used as an existing fuel source to single-family dwellings at the time of adoption of this code.

2. LPG may be permitted within the City limits if used for temporary construction operations.

3. LPG may be used to carry on activities where natural gas would not provide a viable substitute for LPG as approved by the Fire Code Official.

4. Portable LPG containers that are used for recreational vehicles and barbecues

Page 87 of 233 ends

44 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
when stored and handled in accordance with this Code.

Chapter 64 Pyrophoric Materials
Chapter 64 of the 2022 California Fire Code and 2021 International Code is amended as follows:

SECTION 6405 USE
Section 6405.3.1 is added to read:
6405.3.1 Silane distribution systems automatic shutdown.

Silane distribution systems shall automatically shut down at the source upon activation of the gas detection system at levels above the alarm level and/or failure of the ventilation system for the silane distribution system.

Chapter 80 Referenced Standards
The following referenced standard is added:

NFPA
855 – 20: Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems Appendix B Fire-Flow Requirements for Buildings
SECTION B105 FIRE-FLOW REQUIRES FOR BUILDINGS
Section B105.2 is amended to read as follows:

B105.2 Buildings other than one- and two-family dwellings, Group R-3 and R-4 buildings and townhouses. The minimum fire-flow and flow duration for buildings other than one- and two-family dwellings, Group R-3 and R-4 buildings and townhouses shall be as specified in Tables B105.1(2) and B105.2.

Exceptions: [SFM] Group B, S-2 and U occupancies having a floor area not exceeding 1,000 square feet, primarily constructed of noncombustible exterior walls with wood or steel roof framing, having a Class A roof assembly, with uses limited to the following or similar uses:

1. California State Parks buildings of an accessory nature (restrooms).

2. Safety roadside rest areas (SRRA), public restrooms.

3. Truck inspection facilities (TIF), CHP office space and vehicle inspection bays.

Page 88 of 233 ends

45 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5

4. Sand/salt storage buildings, storage of sand and salt.

The maximum fire flow reduction for all commercial buildings greater than 30,000 square feet and residential podium buildings shall not exceed 25 percent of the fire flow specified in Table B105.1(2). The maximum fire flow reduction for all other buildings shall not exceed 50 percent of the fire flow specified in Table B105.1(2).

Appendix C Fire Hydrant Location and Distribution
SECTION C102 NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS
Section C102.1 is amended to read:

C102.1 Minimum number of fire hydrants for a building. The number of fire hydrants available to a building shall be not less than the minimum specified in Table C102.1, utilizing the base fire flow without fire sprinkler reduction.

Appendix D Fire Apparatus Access Roads
SECTION D103 MINIMUM SPECIFICATION
Section D103.1 is deleted.

Section D103.2 is amended to read as follows:

D103.2 Grade. The maximum grade of a fire department apparatus access road shall not exceed 15-percent, unless approved by the fire code official.

Section D103.3 is amended to read as follows:

D103.3 Turning radius. The required turning radius of a fire apparatus access roads shall be a minimum of 30 feet inside, and a minimum of 50 feet outside.

Section D103.4 is amended to read as follows:

D103.4 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads and/or driveways in excess of 150 feet (45 720 mm) shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with the Santa Clara County Fire Department apparatus access and turnaround standards, as approved by the fire code official.

Section D103.6 is amended to read as follows:

D103.6 Signs. Where required by the Fire Code Official, fire apparatus access roads shall be designated and marked as a fire lane as set forth in Section 22500.1 of the California Vehicle Code and the Santa Clara County Fire Department A-6 Standard.

Page 89 of 233 ends

46 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches (305 mm) wide by 18 inches (457 mm) high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2.

9.01.070 PENALTIES ADOPTED.

Persons who shall violate a provision of the code adopted under section 9.01.010, as may be amended by this chapter, or who fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the Building Official or Fire Official, or of a permit or certificate used under provisions of the above codes, shall be subject to code enforcement action by the City in accordance with Title 5 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code. Persons committing such violation shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1000 or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both fine and imprisonment, unless the violation is made an infraction by the prosecuting authority.

SECTION 3. Chapter 9.05 of Title 9 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code is hereby repealed.

SECTION 4. Chapter 9.03, 9.10, and 9.11 of Title 9 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code are hereby repealed.

SECTION 5. The City Council finds and determines that enactment of this Ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 6. All other ordinances of the City of Monte Sereno or provisions of the Monte Sereno which are in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 2023. However, where applications and plans for building have been filed and are pending for building permits prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, such permits may be issued, and the applicant may proceed with construction in strict compliance with the California Building Standards Codes, 2019 Editions, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, as previously adopted and amended by any ordinances of the City of Monte Sereno, but only to the extent that the issuance of such permit is required by Health and Safety Code section 18938.5 and any other applicable law.

SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision of such Ordinance and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.

Page 90 of 233 ends

47 OAK #4886-2943-5192 v5
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Ordinance to be filed with the California Building Standards Commission in the manner required by law, and shall cause this ordinance to be posted and/or published in the manner required by law.

This Ordinance was introduced on the 1st day of November, 2022, and passed and adopted on the 15th day of November, 2022, at a duly held meeting of the City Council of the City of Monte Sereno by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Javed I. Ellahie, Mayor
Attest: ___________________________
Gloisy Gonzalez-Langarica, Deputy City Clerk

Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Sergio Rudin, City Attorney

Page 91 of 233 ends
Page 1 of 5 ends

OAK #4894-2205-7784 v2
ORDINANCE NO. NS-231

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO AMENDING TITLE 9, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE MONTE SERENO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD SECTIONS 9.01.040 AND 9.01.060 TO ENACT SPECIFIED LOCAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, 2022 EDITION, TITLE 24, PART 6 AND THE CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, 2022 EDITION, TITLE 24, PART 11 OF THE CALIFORNIA

CODE OF REGULATIONS
WHEREAS, each city in California is required to adopt the California Building Standards Code and is authorized to do so by reference under Health and Safety Code section 17922 and Government Code section 50022.2; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17958.7, each city in California may enact local amendments to the California upon making findings that local amendments are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code section 25402.1(h) (2) and section 10-106 of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards establish a process which allows local adoption of amendments to statewide energy standards that are more stringent than the statewide standards (“Reach Codes”) if they are found to be cost effective, and require buildings to be designed to consume no more energy than permitted by Title 24 and approved by the California Energy Commission; and
WHEREAS, a cost effectiveness study was prepared by Frontier Energy Inc., Misti Bruceri and Associates, LLC entitled “2022 Cost-effectiveness Study: Single Family New Construction” which found that certain residential new construction to be cost effective, especially for cooking, water heating and clothes drying equipment, in all California climate zones and the study is sufficient to justify Monte Sereno reach code requirements and the cost effectiveness analysis required by the California Energy Commission for the local amendments to the California Energy Code; and WHEREAS, the adopted Building Code includes voluntary sustainability measures known as Cal Green Tier 1 and Tier 2.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTE SERENO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby makes the following findings and determinations:

Page 92 of 233 ends
Page 2 of 5 ends

OAK #4894-2205-7784 v2
A. The entire Silicon Valley is located in seismic zone D & E. Gypsum wallboard and exterior portland cement plaster have performed poorly during the recent California seismic events. The shear values of gypsum wallboard and portland cement stucco contained in the code are based on mono-directional testing. It is appropriate to limit the use of these products until cyclic load testing is performed and evaluated.

B. The City of Monte Sereno is located in seismic zone D & E. The increased possibility of earthquake activity in the area can affect the availability of emergency services due to damage to the water systems, damage to roadways, debris on roadways and the low priority of single-family homes in emergency conditions. Historically, fire has been a real danger in the aftermath of earthquake damage, and the occurrence of a major earthquake would significantly impact the ability of fire crews to respond to emergencies should roadways be damaged, or if the water system be extensively damaged during a seismic event.

C. Monte Sereno is located in a hilly area with many canyons and areas of dense wildland vegetation. The area is subject to periods of low rainfall, frequent periods of low humidity and high temperatures, and is subject to gusty winds up to 30 mph. These conditions present an increased fire danger and increase the possibility of fire spreading to other properties that are not easily or directly accessible from the point of origin. The City also experiences low humidity, high wind, and warm temperatures during the summer months creating conditions which are particularly conducive to the ignition and spread of grass, brush, and structure fires;
D. The streets within the City are a combination of public and private roadways, which due to the many hills and canyons are narrow and often dead end creating additional problems for vehicles and personnel to respond in emergency situations such as a fire.

E. Over the next century, increasing levels of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrates are expected to result in global temperature increases, causing a variety of local changes, including extreme weather conditions, sea level rise, more frequent heat waves and extended period of drought. Increased heat as a result of climate change can have a local impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the City's population, especially those without resources to purchase air conditioning, the elderly, disabled, or those with children. Failure to address and substantially reduce Greenhouse Gas creates an increased risk to the health, safety and welfare of the City residents;
F. Due to these climatic, geological, geographical, and topographical conditions, mitigation measures are necessary such as automatic fire suppression systems, communications systems, access to buildings, seismic protection, safety controls for hazardous materials, and other safeguards are necessary in order to minimize the risks

Page 93 of 233 ends
Page 3 of 5 ends

OAK #4894-2205-7784 v2
to citizens, firefighters, and property resulting from the severity of a fire threat and potential delays in responding to such threats.

G. Cost Effectiveness. The City Council finds that the overview of the cost effectiveness study and the study itself, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A to this ordinance is sufficient to justify Monte Sereno reach code requirements contained in this ordinance and demonstrate that the local amendments to the California Energy Code contained in this ordinance are cost effective and will require buildings to consume no more energy than permitted by Title 24.

H. The local amendments to the California Energy Code and Green Building Standards Code in this ordinance are reasonably necessary because of the local climatic, geological, and topographical conditions identified in this section.

SECTION 2. Section 9.01.040 of Chapter 9.01 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code is enacted to read in entirety as follows:

9.01.040 Amendments to the California Code Of Regulations Title 24, Part 6, 2022 California Energy Code.

The California Energy Code, 2022 Edition is hereby amended as follows:

Section 100.0(e)2.D Single-family buildings is amended to read in its entirety as follows:
i. Sections applicable. Sections 150.0 through 150.1 apply to newly constructed low-rise residential buildings except where they conflict with Section iii below. ii. Compliance approaches. In order to comply with Part 6, newly constructed low-rise residential buildings must meet the requirements of:
a. Mandatory measures: the applicable provisions of Sections 110.0 through 110.10 and 150.0; and
b. Either:
(i) Performance approach: Section 150.1 (a) and (b); or (ii) Prescriptive approach: Sections 150.1(a) and (c).
iii All electric construction. All single-family residential and low-rise multifamily buildings as defined in Section 100.1 shall use electricity as the source of energy for all appliances.

Exceptions:

1. Cooking appliances

2. Exterior appliances

Page 94 of 233 ends
Page 4 of 5 ends

OAK #4894-2205-7784 v2
SECTION 3. Section 9.01.060 of Chapter 9.01 of the Monte Sereno Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

9.01.060 Amendments to the California Code Of Regulations Title 24, Part 6, 2022 California Green Building Standards Code
The California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition is hereby amended as follows:

1. Chapter 4, Residential Mandatory Measures, Section 4.106.4.1- New One and Two-Family Dwellings and Townhouses with Attached Private Garages. Section

4.106.4.1 is amended to read as follows:

For each dwelling unit, install a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208/240-volt branch circuit for each garage parking space with a maximum of two and one outside each garage. The raceway shall not be less than trade size 1 (nominal 1-inch inside diameter). The raceway shall originate at the main service or subpanel and shall terminate into a listed cabinet, box or other enclosure in close proximity to the proposed location of an EV charger. Raceways are required to be continuous at enclosed, inaccessible or concealed areas and spaces. The service panel and/or subpanel shall provide capacity to install a 40- ampere 208/240-volt minimum dedicated branch circuit and space(s) reserved to permit installation of a branch circuit overcurrent protective device.

Exception: A raceway is not required if a minimum 40-ampere 208/240-volt dedicated EV branch circuit is installed in close proximity to the proposed location of an EV charger at the time of original construction in accordance with the California Electrical Code.

2. Chapter 4, Residential Mandatory Measures, Section 4.303 Indoor Water Use.

Section 4.303.4 is added to read as follows:

4.303.4 Hot Water Recirculating System. An automatic hot water recirculating system shall be installed in accordance with the California Plumbing Code.

SECTION 4. The City Council finds and determines that enactment of this Ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 5. All other ordinances of the City of Monte Sereno or provisions of the Monte Sereno which are in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon the latter of (1) approval by the California Energy Commission, or (2) January 1, 2023.

Page 95 of 233 ends
Page 5 of 5 ends

OAK #4894-2205-7784 v2
SECTION 7. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision of such Ordinance and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.

SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Ordinance to be filed with the California Energy Commission and California Building Standards Commission in the manner required by law, and shall cause this ordinance to be published in the manner required by law.

This Ordinance was introduced on the 1st day of November, 2022, and passed and adopted on the 15th day of November, 2022, at a duly held meeting of the City Council of the City of Monte Sereno by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Javed I. Ellahie, Mayor
Attest: ___________________________
Gloisy Gonzalez-Langarica, Deputy City Clerk

Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Sergio Rudin, City Attorney

Page 96 of 233 ends

Prepared by:

Frontier Energy, Inc
Misti Bruceri & Associates, LLC
Prepared for:

Kelly Cunningham, Codes and Standards Program, Pacific Gas and Electric Last modified: 2022/09/12
Revision: 1.0
2022 Cost-Effectiveness Study:

Single Family New
Construction

Page 97 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Legal Notice
This report was prepared by Pacific Gas and Electric Company and funded by the California utility customers under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission.

Copyright 2022, Pacific Gas and Electric Company. All rights reserved, except that this document may be used, copied, and distributed without modification.

Neither PG&E nor any of its employees makes any warranty, express or implied; or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any data, information, method, product, policy or process disclosed in this document; or represents that its use will not infringe any privatelyowned rights including, but not limited to, patents, trademarks or copyrights.

Acronym List
2023 PV$ – Present value costs in 2023
ACH50 – Air Changes per Hour at 50 pascals pressure
differential
ACM – Alternative Calculation Method
ADU – Accessory Dwelling Unit
AFUE – Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency
B/C – Lifecycle Benefit-to-Cost Ratio
BEopt – Building Energy Optimization Tool
BSC – Building Standards Commission
CA IOUs – California Investor-Owned Utilities
CASE – Codes and Standards Enhancement
CBECC-Res – Computer program developed by the California Energy Commission for use in demonstrating
compliance with the California Residential Building
Energy Efficiency Standards
CFI – California Flexible Installation
CFM – Cubic Feet per Minute
CO2 – Carbon Dioxide
CPAU – City of Palo Alto Utilities
CPUC – California Public Utilities Commission
CZ – California Climate Zone
DHW – Domestic Hot Water
DOE – Department of Energy
DWHR – Drain Water Heat Recovery
EDR – Energy Design Rating
EER – Energy Efficiency Ratio
EF – Energy Factor

Page 98 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction GHG – Greenhouse Gas
HERS Rater – Home Energy Rating System Rater
HPA – High Performance Attic
HPWH – Heat Pump Water Heater
HSPF – Heating Seasonal Performance Factor
HVAC – Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
IECC – International Energy Conservation Code
IOU – Investor Owned Utility
kBtu – kilo-British thermal unit
kWh – Kilowatt Hour
LBNL – Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
LCC – Lifecycle Cost
LLAHU – Low Leakage Air Handler Unit
VLLDCS – Verified Low Leakage Ducts in Conditioned Space MF – Multifamily
NEEA – Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
NEM – Net Energy Metering
NPV – Net Present Value
NREL – National Renewable Energy Laboratory
PG&E – Pacific Gas and Electric Company
POU – Publicly-Owned-Utilities
PV – Photovoltaic
SCE – Southern California Edison
SDG&E – San Diego Gas and Electric
SEER – Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio
SF – Single Family
SMUD – Sacramento Municipal Utility District
SoCalGas – Southern California Gas Company
TDV – Time Dependent Valuation
Therm – Unit for quantity of heat that equals 100,000 British thermal units Title 24 – Title 24, Part 6
TOU – Time-Of-Use
UEF – Uniform Energy Factor
ZNE – Zero-net Energy

Page 99 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Summary of Revisions
Date Description Reference (page or section)
9/12/2022 Original Release N/A

Page 100 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................................................1 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................3 2 Methodology and Assumptions...............................................................................................................................4

2.1 Analysis for Reach Codes..................................................................................................................................................... 4

2.1.1 Modeling ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4

2.1.2 Cost-Effectiveness ........................................................................................................................................................ 4

2.1.3 Utility Rates................................................................................................................................................................... 6

2.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................................................................. 6

2.3 Energy Design Rating........................................................................................................................................................... 7 3 Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs............................................................................................................8

3.3 Measure Definitions and Costs ........................................................................................................................................... 10

3.3.1 Efficiency, Solar PV, and Batteries ............................................................................................................................. 10

3.3.2 All-Electric................................................................................................................................................................... 16

3.4 Measure Packages ............................................................................................................................................................. 22 4 Results......................................................................................................................................................................24

4.1 2022 Metrics and Compliance............................................................................................................................................. 24

4.2 All-Electric Code Minimum Results ..................................................................................................................................... 26

4.3 All-Electric Plus Efficiency, PV, and Battery Results........................................................................................................... 29

4.4 Mixed Fuel Results ............................................................................................................................................................. 31

4.5 CARE Rate Comparison..................................................................................................................................................... 34

4.6 Utility Infrastructure Cost Sensitivity.................................................................................................................................... 36

4.7 Greenhouse Gas Reductions.............................................................................................................................................. 38 5 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................41 6 References ...............................................................................................................................................................44 7 Appendices ..............................................................................................................................................................46

7.1 Map of California Climate Zones......................................................................................................................................... 46

7.2 Utility Rate Schedules......................................................................................................................................................... 47

7.2.1 Pacific Gas & Electric.................................................................................................................................................. 47

7.2.2 Southern California Edison ......................................................................................................................................... 53

7.2.3 Southern California Gas.............................................................................................................................................. 57

7.2.4 San Diego Gas & Electric............................................................................................................................................ 60

7.2.5 City of Palo Alto Utilities.............................................................................................................................................. 65

7.2.6 Sacramento Municipal Utilities District (Electric Only)................................................................................................. 68

7.2.7 Fuel Escalation Assumptions...................................................................................................................................... 69

7.3 Summary of Measures by Package .................................................................................................................................... 70

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Utility Tariffs Used Based on Climate Zone ............................................................................................................................ 6 Table 2: Prototype Characteristics........................................................................................................................................................ 8

Page 101 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Table 3: Base case Characteristics of the Prototypes .......................................................................................................................... 9 Table 4: Base Package PV Capacities (kW-DC) ................................................................................................................................ 10 Table 5: Incremental Cost Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Table 6. Single Family IOU Natural Gas Main Distribution Line Extension Costs............................................................................... 17 Table 7. Residential IOU Gas Line Extension Appliance Allowances ................................................................................................. 17 Table 8. Single Family IOU Natural Gas Service Line Extension Costs ............................................................................................. 17 Table 9. Single Family IOU Other Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs................................................................................................... 17 Table 10. Single Family IOU Total Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs1 ................................................................................................ 18 Table 11. Single Family CPAU Total Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs .............................................................................................. 18 Table 12. ADU Utility Infrastructure Costs .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 13: Lifetime of Water Heating & Space Conditioning Equipment Measures ............................................................................. 19 Table 14. Single Family All-Electric Appliance Incremental Costs...................................................................................................... 21 Table 15. ADU All-Electric Appliance Incremental Costs.................................................................................................................... 22 Table 16. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Code Minimum............................................................................................ 27 Table 17. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Code Minimum.......................................................................................................... 28 Table 18. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Energy Efficiency + Additional PV + Battery ............................................... 29 Table 19. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Energy Efficiency + Additional PV + Battery ............................................................. 30 Table 20. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery............................................................................ 31 Table 21. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery ......................................................................................... 32 Table 22. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Packages ................................................................................................... 33 Table 23. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Packages ................................................................................................................. 34 Table 24. On-Bill Cost-Effectiveness with CARE Tariffs: All-Electric Code Minimum ......................................................................... 35 Table 25. On-Bill Cost-Effectiveness with CARE Tariffs: Mixed Fuel Efficiency+ PV+ Battery Package ............................................ 36 Table 26. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness Comparison with Range of Natural Gas Utility Infrastructure Costs: All-Electric Code Minimum ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 37 Table 27. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness On-Bill Impact of CPUC Proposed Design on Gas Line Extension Allowances: AllElectric Code Minimum....................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Table 28: Single Family Greenhouse Gas Reductions (metric tons) .................................................................................................. 39 Table 29 ADU Greenhouse Gas Savings (metric tons) ...................................................................................................................... 40 Table 30. Summary of All-Electric Efficiency EDR2 Margins and Cost-Effectiveness ........................................................................ 42 Table 31. Summary of Mixed Fuel Efficiency EDR2 Margins and Cost-Effectiveness........................................................................ 43 Table 32: PG&E Baseline Territory by Climate Zone.......................................................................................................................... 48 Table 33: PG&E Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm)..................................................................................................................................... 48

Page 102 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Table 34: PG&E Monthly CARE (GL-1) Gas Rate ($/therm)............................................................................................................... 48 Table 35: SCE Baseline Territory by Climate Zone ............................................................................................................................ 54 Table 36: SoCalGas Baseline Territory by Climate Zone ................................................................................................................... 58 Table 37: SoCalGas Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm) .............................................................................................................................. 58 Table 38: SDG&E Baseline Territory by Climate Zone ....................................................................................................................... 60 Table 39: SDG&E Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm).................................................................................................................................. 60 Table 40: CPAU Monthly Gas Rate ($/therm)..................................................................................................................................... 66 Table 41: Real Utility Rate Escalation Rate Assumptions................................................................................................................... 69 Table 42: Single Family Efficiency Package Measures ...................................................................................................................... 70 Table 43: Single Family Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery Package Measures............................................................................ 71 Table 44: ADU Efficiency Package Measures .................................................................................................................................... 71 Table 45: Single Family All-Electric Code Compliant Efficiency Measures......................................................................................... 72 Table 46: ADU All-Electric Code Compliant Efficiency Measures....................................................................................................... 72

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Single Family All-Electric Home Compliance Impacts ......................................................................................................... 24 Figure 2: ADU All-Electric Home Compliance Impacts ....................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 3: Single Family Four Gas Appliance Home Compliance Impacts........................................................................................... 25 Figure 4. Map of California climate zones........................................................................................................................................... 46

Page 103 of 233 ends
Page 104 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Executive Summary
1 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Executive Summary
The California Codes and Standards (C&S) Reach Codes program provides technical support to local governments considering adopting a local ordinance (reach code) intended to support meeting local and/or statewide energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction goals. The program facilitates adoption and implementation of the code when requested by local jurisdictions by providing resources such as cost-effectiveness studies, model language, sample findings, and other supporting documentation.

This report documents cost-effectiveness analysis results for traditional new detached single family and detached accessory dwelling unit (ADUs) building types. It evaluates mixed fuel and all-electric package options in all sixteen California climate zones (CZs). Packages include combinations of efficiency measures, on-site renewable energy, and battery energy storage.

The following summarizes key results from the study:
• All-electric packages have lower GHG emissions than mixed-fuel packages in all cases, due to the clean power sources currently available from California’s power providers. • The Reach Codes Team found all-electric new construction to be feasible and cost effective based on TDV in all cases. In many cases all-electric code minimum construction results in an increase in utility costs and is not cost-effective On-Bill. Some exceptions include the SMUD and CPAU territories where lower electricity rates relative to natural gas rates result in lower overall utility bills. • The 2022 Title 24 Code’s new source energy metric combined with the heat pump baseline encourage allelectric construction, providing an incentive that allows for some amount of prescriptively required building efficiency to be traded off. This compliance benefit for all-electric homes highlights a unique opportunity for jurisdictions to incorporate efficiency into all-electric reach codes. Efficiency and electrification have symbiotic benefits and are both critical for decarbonization of buildings. As demand on the electric grid is increased through electrification, efficiency can reduce the negative impacts of additional electricity demand on the grid, reducing the need for increased generation and storage capacity, as well as the need to upgrade upstream transmission and distribution equipment. The Reach Codes Team recommends that jurisdictions adopting an all-electric reach code for single family buildings also include an efficiency requirement with EDR2 margins consistent with the all-electric code minimum package.
• The code compliance margins for the ADU all-electric code minimum package are lower than for the single family prototype and code compliance can be more challenging for smaller dwelling units. As a result, the Reach Codes Team does not recommend an additional efficiency requirement for all-electric ADU ordinances. • Electrification combined with increased PV capacity results in utility cost savings and was found to be On-Bill cost effective in all cases. These results were based on today’s net energy metering rules and do not account for future changes to utility agreements, which are expected to decrease the value of PV to the consumer. • For jurisdictions interested in a reach code that allows for mixed fuel buildings, the mixed fuel efficiency, PV, and battery package was found to be cost effective based on TDV in all cases. Cost effectiveness was marginal because of the high cost of the battery system. EDR2 margins ranged from 7 to 30 for the costeffective packages. • Applying the CARE rates has the overall impact to increase utility cost savings for an all-electric building compared to a code compliant mixed fuel building, improving On-Bill cost-effectiveness.

This report presents measures or measure packages that local jurisdictions may consider adopting to achieve energy savings and emissions reductions beyond what will be accomplished by enforcing minimum state requirements, the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6), effective January 1, 2023.

Local jurisdictions may also adopt ordinances that amend different Parts of the California Building Standards Code or may elect to amend other state or municipal codes. The decision regarding which code to amend will determine the specific requirements that must be followed for an ordinance to be legally enforceable. For example, jurisdictions that only want to require all-electric construction may amend Part 11 instead of Part 6 of the CA Building Code requiring

Page 105 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Executive Summary
2 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 review and approval by the Building Standards Commission (BSC) but not the California Energy Commission (Energy Commission). Reach codes that amend Part 6 of the CA Building Code and require energy performance beyond state code minimums must demonstrate the proposed changes are cost-effective and obtain approval from the Energy Commission. Although a cost-effectiveness study is only required to amend Part 6 of the CA Building Code, this study provides valuable context for jurisdictions pursuing other ordinance paths to understand the economic impacts of any policy decision. This study documents the estimated costs, benefits, energy impacts and greenhouse gas emission reductions that may result from implementing an ordinance based on the results to help residents, local leadership, and other stakeholders make informed policy decisions.

Model ordinance language and other resources are posted on the C&S Reach Codes Program website at LocalEnergyCodes.com. Local jurisdictions that are considering adopting an ordinance may contact the program for further technical support at [email protected].

Page 106 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Introduction
3 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 1 Introduction
This report documents cost-effective combinations of measures that exceed the minimum state requirements, the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, effective January 1, 2023, for newly constructed single family buildings. This report was developed in coordination with the California Statewide Investor-Owned Utilities (CA IOUs) Codes and Standards Program, key consultants, and engaged cities—collectively known as the Reach Codes Team.

The analysis considers traditional detached single family and detached accessory dwelling unit (ADUs) building types and evaluates mixed fuel and all-electric package options in all sixteen California climate zones (CZs). 1 Packages include combinations of efficiency measures, on-site renewable energy, and battery energy storage.

The California Building Energy Efficiency Standards Title 24, Part 6 (Title 24) (California Energy Commission, 2021a) is maintained and updated every three years by two state agencies: the California Energy Commission (Energy Commission) and the Building Standards Commission (BSC). In addition to enforcing the code, local jurisdictions have the authority to adopt local energy efficiency ordinances—or reach codes—that exceed the minimum standards defined by Title 24 (as established by Public Resources Code Section 25402.1(h)2 and Section 10-106 of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards). Local jurisdictions must demonstrate that the requirements of the proposed ordinance are costeffective and do not result in buildings consuming more energy than is permitted by Title 24. In addition, the jurisdiction must obtain approval from the Energy Commission and file the ordinance with the BSC for the ordinance to be legally enforceable.

The Department of Energy (DOE) sets minimum efficiency standards for equipment and appliances that are federally regulated under the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, including heating, cooling, and water heating equipment (E-CFR, 2020). Since state and local governments are prohibited from adopting higher minimum efficiencies than the federal standards require, the focus of this study is to identify and evaluate cost-effective packages that do not include high efficiency heating, cooling, and water heating equipment. High efficiency appliances are often the easiest and most affordable measures to increase energy performance. While federal preemption limits reach code mandatory requirements for covered appliances, in practice, builders may install any package of compliant measures to achieve the performance requirements.
1 See Appendix 7.1 Map of California Climate Zones for a graphical depiction of climate zone locations.

Page 107 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Methodology and Assumptions
4 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 2 Methodology and Assumptions

2.1 Analysis for Reach Codes
This section describes the approach to calculating cost-effectiveness including benefits, costs, metrics, and utility rate selection.

2.1.1 Modeling
The Reach Codes Team performed energy simulations using software approved for 2022 Title 24 Code compliance analysis, CBECC-Res 2022.1.0.

The general approach applied in this analysis is to evaluate performance and determine cost effectiveness of various energy efficiency upgrade measures, individually and as packages, in single family buildings. Using the 2022 baseline as the starting point, prospective measures and packages were identified and modeled in each of the prototypes to determine the projected energy (therm and kWh) and compliance impacts. A large set of parametric runs were conducted to evaluate various options and develop packages of measures that met or exceeded minimum code performance. The analysis utilized a Python based parametric tool to automate and manage the generation of CBECCRes input files. This allowed for quick evaluation of various efficiency measures across multiple climate zones and prototypes and improved quality control. The batch process functionality of CBECC-Res was utilized to simulate large groups of input files at once.

2.1.2 Cost-Effectiveness

2.1.2.1 Benefits
This analysis used two different metrics to assess cost effectiveness of the proposed upgrades. Both methodologies require estimating and quantifying the incremental costs and energy savings associated with each energy efficiency measure. The main difference between the methodologies is the manner in which they value energy and thus the cost savings of reduced or avoided energy use:

Utility Bill Impacts (On-Bill): Customer-based lifecycle cost (LCC) approach that values energy based upon estimated site energy usage and customer utility bill savings using today’s electricity and natural gas utility tariffs. Total savings are estimated over a 30-year duration and include discounting of future costs and energy cost inflation.

Time Dependent Valuation (TDV): Energy Commission LCC methodology, which is intended to capture the total value or cost of energy use over 30 years. This method accounts for long-term projected costs, such as the cost of providing energy during peak periods of demand and other societal costs, such as projected costs for carbon emissions, as well as grid transmission and distribution impacts. This metric values energy use differently depending on the fuel source (natural gas, electricity, and propane), time of day, and season. For example, electricity used (or saved) during peak periods has a much higher value than electricity used (or saved) during off-peak periods due to the less inefficient energy generation sources providing peak electricity (Horii, Cutter, Kapur, Arent, & Conotyannis, 2014).

This is the methodology used by the Energy Commission in evaluating cost effectiveness for efficiency measures in Title 24, Part 6.

2.1.2.2 Costs
The Reach Codes Team assessed the incremental costs of the measures and packages over a 30-year lifecycle.

Incremental costs represent the equipment, installation, replacements, and maintenance costs of the proposed measure relative to the 2022 Title 24 Standards minimum requirements or standard industry practices. Present value of replacement cost is included for measures with lifetimes less than the evaluation period.

In calculating On-Bill cost effectiveness, incremental first costs were assumed to be financed into a mortgage or loan with a 30-year loan term and four percent interest rate. Financing was not applied to future replacement or maintenance costs. In calculating TDV cost effectiveness, incremental first costs were not assumed to be financed into a mortgage or loan.

Page 108 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Methodology and Assumptions
5 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

2.1.2.3 Metrics
Cost-effectiveness is presented using net present value (NPV) and benefit-to-cost (B/C) ratio metrics.

NPV Savings: The lifetime NPV savings is reported as a cost-effectiveness metric, Equation 1 demonstrates how this is calculated. If the net savings of a measure or package is positive, it is considered cost-effective. Negative savings represent net costs.

B/C Ratio: Ratio of the present value (PV) of all benefits to the present value of all costs over 30 years (PV benefits divided by PV costs). The criteria benchmark for cost effectiveness is a B/C ratio greater than one. A value of one indicates the NPV of the savings over the life of the measure is equivalent to the NPV of the lifetime incremental cost of that measure. A value greater than one represents a positive return on investment. The B/C ratio is calculated according to Equation 2.

Equation 1
𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑏𝑏 − 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑐𝑐 Equation 2
𝐵𝐵 − − 𝐶𝐶 𝑅𝑅 = 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑏𝑏
𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑐𝑐
Improving the efficiency of a project often requires an initial incremental investment. In most cases the benefit is represented by annual On-Bill utility or TDV savings, and the cost is represented by incremental first cost and replacement costs. However, some packages result in initial construction cost savings (negative incremental cost), and either energy cost savings (positive benefits), or increased energy costs (negative benefits). In cases where both construction costs and energy-related savings are negative, the construction cost savings are treated as the ‘benefit’ while the increased energy costs are the ‘cost.’ In cases where a measure or package is cost-effective immediately (i.e., upfront construction cost savings and lifetime energy cost savings), B/C ratio cost effectiveness is represented by “>1”.

The lifetime costs or benefits are calculated according to Equation 3.

Equation 3
𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑐𝑐 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑏𝑏 = �(𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 𝑐𝑐 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑏𝑏 )𝑡𝑡
(1 + )𝑡𝑡
𝑛𝑛
𝑡𝑡=0
Where:
• n = analysis term in years
• r = discount rate
The following summarizes the assumptions applied in this analysis to both methodologies. • Analysis term of 30 years
• Real discount rate of three percent
TDV is a normalized monetary format and there is a unique procedure for calculating the present value benefit of TDV energy savings. The present value of the energy cost savings in dollars is calculated by multiplying the TDV savings (reported by the CBECC-Res simulation software) by a NPV factor developed by the Energy Commission (see (Energy + Environmental Economics, 2020)). The 30-year residential NPV factor is $0.173/kTDV kBtu for the 2022 code cycle.

Equation 4
𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝑏𝑏 = 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝑒𝑒 ∗ 𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁

Page 109 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Methodology and Assumptions
6 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

2.1.3 Utility Rates
In coordination with the CA IOU rate team (comprised of representatives from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE) and San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E)) and two Publicly-Owned-Utilities (POUs) (Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) and City of Palo Alto Utilities (CPAU)), the Reach Codes Team determined appropriate utility rates for each climate zone in order to calculate utility costs and determine On-Bill cost effectiveness for the proposed measures and packages. The utility tariffs, summarized in Table 1, were determined based on the most prevalent active rate in each territory. Utility rates were applied to each climate zone based on the predominant IOU serving the population of each zone, with a few climate zones evaluated multiple times under different utility scenarios. Climate Zones 10 and 14 were evaluated with both SCE/SoCalGas and SDG&E tariffs since each utility has customers within these climate zones. Climate Zone 5 is evaluated under both PG&E and SoCalGas natural gas rates. Two POU or municipal utility rates were also evaluated: SMUD in Climate Zone 12 and CPAU in Climate Zone 4.

First-year utility costs were calculated using hourly electricity and natural gas output from CBECC-Res and applying the utility tariffs summarized in Table 1. Annual costs were also estimated for customers eligible for the CARE tariff discounts on both electricity and natural gas bills. Appendix 7.2 Utility Rate Schedules includes details of each utility tariff. For cases with PV generation, the approved NEM2 tariffs were applied along with minimum daily use billing and mandatory non-bypassable charges. Future changes to the NEM tariffs are likely and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has issued a proposed decision with suggested changes that is expected to be finalized in 2022. 2 The ADU was assumed to have separate electric and gas meters from the main house.

Table 1. Utility Tariffs Used Based on Climate Zone
Climate Zones Electric / Gas Utility Electricity Natural Gas IOUs
1-5,11-13,16 PG&E / PG&E E-TOU Option C G1
5 PG&E / SoCalGas E-TOU Option C GR
6, 8-10, 14, 15 SCE / SoCalGas TOU-D Option 4-9 GR
7, 10, 14 SDG&E / SDG&E TOU-DR-1 GR
POUs
4 CPAU / CPAU E-1 G-2
12 SMUD / PG&E R-TOD (RT02) G1
Utility rates are assumed to escalate over time according to the assumptions from the CPUC 2021 En Banc hearings on utility costs through 2030 (California Public Utilities Commission, 2021a). Escalation rates through the remainder of the 30-year evaluation period are based on the escalation rate assumptions within the 2022 TDV factors. See Appendix 7.2.7 Fuel Escalation Assumptions for details.

2.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The analysis reports the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission estimates based on assumptions within CBECC-Res. There are 8,760 hourly multipliers accounting for time dependent energy use and carbon based on source emissions, including renewable portfolio standard projections. There are two strings of multipliers—one for Northern California 2 https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/nemrevisit

Page 110 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Methodology and Assumptions
7 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 climate zones, and another for Southern California climate zones. 3 GHG emissions are reported as average annual metric tons of CO2 equivalent over the 30-year building lifetime.

2.3 Energy Design Rating
The 2019 Title 24 Code introduced California’s Energy Design Rating (EDR) as the primary metric to demonstrate compliance with the energy code for single family buildings. This EDR was based on the hourly TDV energy use from a building that is compliant with the 2006 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) as the Reference Building. The Reference Building has an EDR score of 100 while a zero-net energy (ZNE) home has an EDR score of zero. While the Reference Building is used to set the scale for the rating, the Proposed Design is still compared to the Standard Design based on the Title 24 prescriptive baseline assumptions to determine compliance.

In the 2022 Title 24 Code a second new EDR metric was introduced based on hourly source energy. The two EDR metrics are described below:
• EDR1 is calculated based on source energy.
• EDR2 is calculated based on TDV energy.

Furthermore, EDR2 is composed of two components for compliance purposes. The Efficiency EDR2 which represents the energy efficiency features of a home. The PV/Flexibility EDR2 includes the effects of PV and battery storage systems. Total EDR2 combines both the Efficiency and PV/Flexibility impacts. While the Efficiency EDR2 does not include the full impact of a battery system, it can include a self-utilization credit for batteries if certain conditions are met.

For a new, single family building to comply with the 2022 Title 24 Code, three criteria are required:

1. The Proposed EDR1 must be equal to or less than the EDR1 of the Standard Design, and

2. The Proposed Efficiency EDR2 must be equal to or less than the Efficiency EDR2 of the Standard Design, and

3. The Proposed Total EDR2 must be equal to or less than the Total EDR2 of the Standard Design.

This concept, consistent with California’s “loading order” which prioritizes energy efficiency ahead of renewable generation, requires projects meet a minimum Efficiency EDR2 before PV is credited but allows for PV to be traded off with additional efficiency when meeting the Total EDR2. A project may improve on building efficiency beyond the minimum required and subsequently reduce the PV generation capacity necessary to achieve the required Total EDR2.

However, it may not increase the size of the PV system and trade this off with a reduction of efficiency measures.

Results from this analysis are presented as EDR Margin, a reduction in the EDR score relative to the Standard Design.

EDR Margin is a better metric to use than absolute EDR in the context of a reach code because absolute values vary based on the home design and characteristics such as size and orientation. Referencing the margin results in similar requirements across a variety of designs. This approach aligns with how compliance is reported for the 2019 and 2022 Title 24 Code. The EDR Margin is calculated according to Equation 5.

Equation 5
𝐸𝐸 𝑀𝑀 = 𝑆𝑆 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝑆𝑆 𝐸𝐸 − 𝑃𝑃 𝐸𝐸
3 CBECC-Res multipliers are the same for CZs 1-5 and 11-13 (Northern California), while there is another set of multipliers for CZs 6-10 and 14-16 (Southern California).

Page 111 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
8 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 3 Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
This section describes the prototypes and the scope of analysis drawing from previous 2019 Reach Code research where necessary.

3.1 Prior Reach Code Research
In 2019, the Reach Codes Team analyzed the cost-effectiveness of residential single family new construction projects for mixed-fuel and all-electric packages (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2019). Using this analysis, several cities and counties in California adopted local energy code amendments encouraging or requiring that low-rise residential new construction be all-electric. As there were few changes to the single family requirements, this analysis for the 2022 code cycle leveraged the work completed for the 2019 reports. Initial efficiency packages were based on the final packages from the 2019 research and were revised to reflect measure specifications and costs based on new data.

3.2 Prototype Characteristics
The Energy Commission defines building prototypes which it uses to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of proposed changes to Title 24 requirements. For the 2022 code cycle the Energy Commission used two single family prototypes, both of which were used in this analysis. Additional details on the prototypes can be found in the Alternative Calculation Method (ACM) Approval Manual (California Energy Commission, 2018).

Additionally, a detached new construction ADU prototype was developed to reflect recent trends in California construction related to the high cost of housing (TRC, 2021). ADUs are additional dwelling units typically built on the property of an existing single-family parcel. ADUs are defined as new construction in the energy code when they are ground-up developments, do not convert an existing space to livable space, and are not attached to the primary dwelling. The evaluated prototype is not representative of an attached ADU constructed as an addition to an existing home.

The Reach Codes Team leveraged prior research to define the detached ADU baseline and measure packages. The house size and number of bedrooms were based on data from a survey conducted by UC Berkeley’s Center for Community Innovation (UC Berkeley Center for Community Innovation, 2021). The survey found that the average square footage for new ADUs statewide is 615 square feet and that the majority (61 percent) of new ADUs have one bedroom.

Table 2 describes the basic characteristics of each prototype. The prototypes have equal geometry on all walls, windows and roof to be orientation neutral.

Table 2: Prototype Characteristics
Characteristic Single Family
One-Story
Single Family
Two-Story ADU
Conditioned Floor Area 2,100 ft2 2,700 ft2 625 ft2
Num. of Stories 1 2 1
Num. of Bedrooms 3 3 1
Window-to-Floor Area Ratio 20% 20% 20%
The Energy Commission’s protocol for the two single family prototypes is to weight the simulated energy impacts by a factor that represents the distribution of single-story and two-story homes being built statewide. This study assumed 50 percent single-story and 50 percent two-story. Simulation results in this study are characterized according to this ratio, which is approximately equivalent to a 2,400-square foot (ft2) house. 4 ADU results are presented separately. 42,400 ft2 = (50% x 2,100 ft2) + (50% x 2,700 ft2)

Page 112 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
9 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 The methodology used in the analyses for each of the prototypical building types begins with a design that precisely meets the minimum 2022 prescriptive requirements (zero compliance margin). Table 150.1-A in the 2022 Standards (California Energy Commission, 2021a) lists the prescriptive measures that determine the baseline design in each climate zone. Other features are consistent with the Standard Design in the ACM Reference Manual (California Energy Commission, 2022), and are designed to meet, but not exceed, the minimum requirements. Each prototype building has the following features:
• Slab-on-grade foundation.
• Vented attic.
• High performance attic in climate zones where prescriptively required (CZ 4, 8-16) with insulation installed at the ceiling and below the roof deck per Option B. (Refer to Table 150.1-A in the 2022 Standards.) • Ductwork located in the attic.

Table 3 describes additional characteristics as they were applied to the base case energy model in this analysis. In a shift from the 2019 Standards, the 2022 Standards define a prescriptive fuel source for space heating and water heating establishing a heat pump baseline. In each climate zone one heat pump is prescriptively required. In most climate zones the prescriptive base case includes a heat pump water heater and a natural gas furnace for space heating. In Climate Zones 3, 4, 13, and 14 this is reversed, where the base case has a heat pump space heater and natural gas tankless water heater.

Table 3: Base case Characteristics of the Prototypes
Characteristic Single Family ADU
Space
Heating/Cooling1,2
CZs 1-2,5-12,15-16: Natural gas furnace, split
AC 80 AFUE, 14 SEER, 11.7 EER
CZs 3-4,13-14: Split heat pump – 8.2 HSPF,
14 SEER, 11.7 EER
Same as single family
Water Heater1,2
CZs 1-2,5-12,15-16: Heat pump water heater
(HPWH) UEF = 2.0 located in the garage
CZs 3-4,13-14: Natural gas tankless –
UEF = 0.81
Same equipment type as SF
except HPWH is located inside
the conditioned space with the
supply air ducted from outside3
Hot Water
Distribution
Code minimum, all hot water lines insulated
CZs 1,16: Basic compact distribution credit Same as single family Drain Water Heat
Recovery Efficiency CZ 16: 65%, equal flow to shower & water heater Same as single family Cooking Natural Gas Same as single family
Clothes Drying Natural Gas Same as single family
PV System
Sized to offset 100% of electricity use for space
cooling, ventilation, lighting, appliance, & other
miscellaneous electric loads. Size differs by
climate zone ranging from 2.64 kW to 5.33 kW,
see Table 4.

PV is not required when the PV
system size required based on the
prescriptive calculations is less
than 1.8 kW, as is the case in
Climate Zones 1-9, 12, 14, and

16. In the other climate zones the
PV size ranges from 1.74 kW to

2.56 kW, see Table 4.
4 1 Equipment efficiencies are equal to minimum federal appliance efficiency standards. 2 AFUE = annual fuel utilization efficiency. SEER = seasonal energy efficiency ratio. EER = energy efficiency ratio.

HSPF = heating seasonal performance factor. UEF = uniform energy factor. 3 This version of CBECC-Res used in this analysis did not have the capability to directly model ducted HPWHs even though this configuration is called out as the Standard Design in the 2022 ACM (California Energy Commission, 2022). This was modeled by indicating that the tank is located within the conditioned space with the compressor unit located outside. 4 Exception 2 to Section 150.1(c)14 states that “no PV system is required when the minimum PV system size specified by section 150.1(c)14 is less than 1.8 kWdc.” In this analysis this exception is applied based on the sizes calculated per Equation150.1-C of Section 150.1(c)14. The performance software sizes the PV system based on the estimated energy use, which differs slightly from the prescriptive sizing. As a result, the baseline PV capacity from the performance software for Climate Zone 10 is less than 1.8 kWdc.

Page 113 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
10 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 4 summarizes the PV capacities for the base case packages.

Table 4: Base Package PV Capacities (kW-DC)
Climate
Zone
Base Package
Single
Family ADU
CZ01 3.54 0
CZ02 2.99 0
CZ03 2.81 0
CZ04 2.90 0
CZ05 2.62 0
CZ06 2.64 0
CZ07 2.84 0
CZ08 3.13 0
CZ09 2.97 0
CZ10 3.19 1.74
CZ11 3.91 2.07
CZ12 3.12 0
CZ13 4.08 2.11
CZ14 3.16 0
CZ15 5.33 2.56
CZ16 2.90 0

3.3 Measure Definitions and Costs
Measures evaluated in this study fall into two categories: those associated with general efficiency, onsite generation, and demand flexibility and those associated with building electrification. The Reach Codes Team selected measures based on cost-effectiveness as well as decades of experience with residential architects, builders, and engineers along with general knowledge of the relative consumer acceptance of many measures.

The following sections describe the details and incremental cost assumptions for each of the measures. Incremental costs represent the equipment, installation, replacement, and maintenance costs of the proposed measures relative to the base case. 5 Replacement costs are applied for roofs, mechanical equipment, PV inverters and battery systems over the 30-year evaluation period. Maintenance costs are estimated for PV systems, but not any other measures.

Costs were estimated to reflect costs to the building owner. All costs are provided as present value in 2023 (2023 PV$).

The Reach Codes Team obtained measure costs from distributors, contractors, literature review, and online sources such as Home Depot and RS Means. Contractor markups are incorporated. These are the Reach Codes Team best estimate of average costs statewide. However, it's recognized that local costs may differ, and that inflation and supply chain issues may also impact costs.

3.3.1 Efficiency, Solar PV, and Batteries
Following are descriptions of each of the efficiency, PV, and battery measures evaluated under this analysis and applied in at least one of the packages presented in this report. Table 5 summarizes the incremental cost assumptions for each of these measures.
5 All first costs are assumed to be financed in a mortgage and interest costs due to financing are included in the incremental costs. See Section 2.1.2 for details.

Page 114 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
11 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Reduced Infiltration (ACH50): Reduce infiltration in single family homes from the default infiltration assumption of five (5) air changes per hour at 50 Pascals (ACH50) 6 by 40 percent to 3 ACH50. HERS rater field verification and diagnostic testing of building air leakage according to the procedures outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices RA3.8 (California Energy Commission, 2021b).

Lower U-Factor Fenestration: Reduce window U-factor to 0.24. The prescriptive U-factor is 0.30 in all climates.

Higher SHGC Fenestration: Increase solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) to 0.50 in climate zones where heating loads dominate. The baseline solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) applied in the Standard Design is 0.35 in Climate Zones 1, 3, 5, and 16.

Cool Roof: Install a roofing product that’s rated by the Cool Roof Rating Council to have an aged solar reflectance (ASR) equal to or greater than 0.25. Steep-sloped roofs were assumed in all cases. The 2022 Title 24 specifies a prescriptive ASR of 0.20 for Climate Zones 10 through 15.

Increased Ceiling Insulation: Increase ceiling level insulation in a vented attic to R-49 or R-60 insulation.

Slab Insulation: Install R-10 perimeter slab insulation at a depth of 16-inches. This measure doesn’t apply to Climate Zone 16 where slab insulation is required prescriptively.

Low Pressure Drop Ducts: Upgrade the duct distribution system to reduce external static pressure and meet a maximum fan efficacy of 0.35 Watts per cfm. This may involve upsizing ductwork, reducing the total effective length of ducts, and/or selecting low pressure drop components such as filters. Fan watt draw must be verified by a HERS rater according to the procedures outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices RA3.3 (California Energy Commission, 2021b).

Buried Radial Duct Design: Bury all ductwork in ceiling insulation by laying the ducts across the ceiling joists or inbetween ceiling joists directly on the ceiling drywall. Duct design is based on a radial design where individual ducts are run to each supply register. This allows for smaller diameter ducts, reducing duct losses and more easily meeting fully or deeply buried conditions. 7 Duct burial and duct system design must be verified by a HERS rater according to the procedures outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices RA3.1.4.1.5 and RA3.1.4.1.6 (California Energy Commission, 2021b). This applies to the single family prototypes only.

R-8 Duct Insulation: Increase duct insulation to R-8 in the climate zones where R-6 insulation is prescriptive.

Ductless Mini-Split Heat Pump: In the ADU prototype replace the ducted split system with a ductless mini-split heat pump with three indoor heads. The system is evaluated as meeting the criteria for the variable capacity heat pump (VCHP) credit, introduced in the 2019 code cycle, which must be verified by a HERS rater according to the procedures outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices RA3.4.4.3 (California Energy Commission, 2021b). This credit requires verification of refrigerant charge, that all equipment is entirely within conditioned space, that airflow is directly supplied to all habitable space and that wall mounted thermostats serve any zones greater than 150 square feet.

Compact Hot Water Distribution: Design the hot water distribution system to meet minimum requirements for the basic compact hot water distribution credit according to the procedures outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices RA4.4.6 (California Energy Commission, 2021b). In many single family homes this may require moving the water heater from an exterior to an interior garage wall. CBECC-Res software assumes a 30% reduction in distribution losses for the basic credit.

Solar PV: Installation of on-site PV is required in the 2022 residential code unless an exception is met. The PV sizing methodology in each package was developed to offset annual building electricity use and avoid oversizing which would 6 Whole house leakage tested at a pressure difference of 50 Pascals between indoors and outdoors. 7 The duct systems in the Central Valley Research Homes Project Final Project Report are illustrative of this approach (Proctor, Wilcox, & Chitwood, 2018).

Page 115 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
12 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 violate net energy metering (NEM) rules. 8 In all cases, PV is evaluated in CBECC-Res according to the California Flexible Installation (CFI) assumptions.

The Reach Codes Team used two options within the CBECC-Res software for sizing the PV system, described below.

The first option, “Standard Design PV”, was applied in the base case simulations and packages where the PV system size was not changed from the minimum system size required. For the PV packages, the second option was used with a scaling of 100 percent. The Reach Codes Team evaluated an all-electric single family and ADU home with a PV system sized to offset 100 and 90 percent of the total calculated electricity use. Sizing to 100 percent proved to be more cost-effective based on customer utility bills in most cases. As a result, the PV packages were sized to offset 100 percent of electricity use.
• Standard Design PV – the same PV capacity as is required for the Standard Design case9 • Specify PV System Scaling – a PV system sized to offset a specified percentage of the estimated electricity use of the Proposed Design case
One exception to the PV requirement is when the minimum PV system size required is less than 1.8 kWh. This exception applies to the ADU models in Climate Zones 1-9, 12, 14, and 16. For these cases no PV system is required by code and no PV system was modeled in the base case simulations.

Battery Energy Storage: A battery system was evaluated in CBECC-Res with control type set to “Advanced Demand Response Control” and with default efficiencies of 95% for both charging and discharging. The “Advanced Demand Response Control” option assumes the battery system will charge or discharge depending on the needs of the grid. To qualify for the Advanced Demand Response Control the battery system must meet the requirements outlined in the 2022 Reference Appendices JA13.3.3.2 (California Energy Commission, 2021b). 8 NEM rules apply to the IOU territories only.
9 The Standard Design PV system is sized to offset the electricity use of the building loads which are typically electric in a mixed fuel home, which includes all loads except space heating, water heating, clothes drying, and cooking.

Page 116 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
13 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 5: Incremental Cost Assumptions
Measure
Performance
Level
Incremental Cost
(2023 PV$)1
Source & Notes
Single
Family ADU
Non-Preempted Measures
Reduced
Infiltration

3.0 vs 5.0
ACH50 $591 $362 $0.115/ft2 based on NREL’s BEopt cost database plus $250 HERS rater verification.

Window U-factor 0.24 vs 0.30 $2,280 $285 $4.23/ft2 window area based on analysis conducted for the 2019 and 2022 Title 24 cycles (Statewide CASE Team, 2018).

Window SHGC 0.50 vs 0.35 $0 $0 Based on feedback from Statewide CASE Team that higher SHGC does not necessarily have any incremental cost (Statewide CASE Team, 2017).

Cool Roof

0.25 vs 0.20
aged solar
reflectance
$219 $53
$0.07per ft2 of roof area first incremental cost for asphalt shingle product based on the 2022 Nonresidential High Performance Envelope CASE Report (Statewide CASE Team, 2020a).

Total costs assume present value of replacement at year 20 and residual cost for remaining product life at end of 30-year analysis period. Higher reflectance values for lower cost are achievable for tile roof products
Attic Insulation
R-49 vs R-30 $872 n/a
Based on costs from the 2022 Residential Additions & Alterations CASE Report (Statewide CASE Team, 2020b).

R-60 vs R-30 $1,420 n/a
R-60 vs R-38 $1,096 n/a
Slab Edge
Insulation R-10 vs R-0 $651 $449 $4 per linear foot of slab perimeter based on internet research. Assumes 16in depth.

Low Pressure
Drop Ducts

0.35 vs 0.45
W/cfm $99 $49
Costs assume one-hour labor for single family and half-hour for the ADU. Labor rate of $88 per hour is from 2022 RS Means for sheet metal workers and includes a weighted average City Cost Index for labor for California.

Buried Ducts Buried, radial
design $281 n/a
No cost for laying ducts on attic floor versus suspending, in some cases there will be cost savings. Neutral cost for radiant design versus trunk and branch design. A $250 HERS Rater verification fee is included.

Duct Insulation R-8 vs R-6 $201 n/a Based on costs from the 2022 Residential Additions & Alterations CASE Report (Statewide CASE Team, 2020b).

Page 117 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
14 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Measure
Performance
Level
Incremental Cost
(2023 PV$)1
Source & Notes
Single
Family ADU
Ductless MiniSplit Heat Pump
Ductless system
meeting the
VCHP credit vs.
ducted split heat
pump
n/a $1,571
Costs were developed based on data from E3’s 2019 report Residential Building Electrification in California (Energy & Environmental Economics, 2019) and the 2022 AllElectric Multifamily CASE Report (Statewide CASE Team, 2020c). Equipment costs are from the CASE Report for the 10-story multifamily prototype assuming similar sized equipment between the multifamily dwelling unit and the ADU. Thermostat, wiring, electrical, and ducting costs are from the E3 study. A $250 HERS Rater verification fee is also included.

Where this measure is applied to the mixed fuel home with a gas furnace, this cost is in addition to the cost difference for a heat pump versus a gas furnace/split AC reported in Section 3.3.2.

Compact Hot
Water
Distribution
Basic credit –
homes with gas
tankless
$196 $0
For single family homes with a gas tankless water heater (mixed fuel homes in Climate Zones 3,4,13,14) assumes adding 20-feet venting at $14.69 per linear foot to locate water heater on interior garage wall, less 20-feet savings for PEX and pipe insulation at $5.98 per linear foot. Costs from online retailers. For single family homes with a HPWH there is an incremental cost savings from less pipe being required. For the ADU it is assumed the credit can be met without any changes to design and there is no cost impact.

Basic credit –
homes with
HPWH
$-134 $0
PV + Battery
PV System
First Cost $3.21/W $3.21/W
First costs from LBNL’s Tracking the Sun 2021 costs (Barbose, Darghouth, O'Shaughnessy, & Forrester, 2021) and represent median costs in California in 2020 of $3.90/WDC for residential systems. The first cost was reduced by the solar energy Investment Tax Credit of 30%.2 Costs are presented as the average of 2023, 2024, and 2025.

Inverter replacement cost of $0.14/WDC present value includes replacements at year 11 at $0.15/WDC (nominal) and at year 21 at $0.12/WDC (nominal) per the 2019 PV CASE Report (California Energy Commission, 2017).

System maintenance costs of $0.31/WDC present value assume $0.02/WDC (nominal) annually per the 2019 PV CASE Report (California Energy Commission, 2017).

Inverter
replacement $0.14/W $0.14/W
Maintenance $0.31/W $0.31/W

Page 118 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
15 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Measure
Performance
Level
Incremental Cost
(2023 PV$)1
Source & Notes
Single
Family ADU
Battery
First cost $617/kWh $617/kWh
Costs are based on research conducted for the 2021 Batteries in Single Family Homes reach code report (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2021a). $1,000/kWh first cost in 2020 based on Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) residential participant cost data. To estimate the first cost in future years this was reduced by 7% annually based on SDG&E’s Behind-theMeter Battery Market Study (E-Source companies, 2020). The first cost is reduced by the solar energy Investment Tax Credit of 30%.2 Costs are presented as the average of 2023, 2024, and 2025. No SGIP incentives are included.

Replacement cost at year 10 and 20 was calculated based on the 2023 cost reduced by 7% annually over the next 10 years for a future value cost of $389 (present value of $290 in year 10 and $216 in year 20).

Replacement
cost $505/kWh $505/kWh
1 All first costs are assumed to be financed in a mortgage and interest costs due to financing are included in the incremental costs. See Section 2.1.2 for details.

Interest costs were not included for calculating TDV cost-effectiveness. 2As part of the Inflation Reduction Act in August 2022 the Section 25D Investment Tax Credit was extended and raised to 30% through 2032 with a step-down beginning in 2033. https://www.seia.org/sites/default/files/2022-08/Inflation%20Reduction%20Act%20Summary%20PDF%20FINAL.pdf

Page 119 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
16 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

3.3.2 All-Electric
This analysis compared a code compliant mixed fuel prototype, which uses natural gas for three appliances (cooking, clothes drying and either space heating or water heating), with a code compliant all-electric prototype. In these cases, the relative costs between natural gas and electric appliances, differences between in-house electricity and natural gas infrastructure and the associated infrastructure costs for providing natural gas to the building were included.

To estimate costs the Reach Codes Team leveraged costs from the 2019 reach code cost-effectiveness studies for residential new construction (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2019) and detached accessory dwelling units (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2021b), 2022 RS Means, PG&E data, published utility schedules and rules, and online research.

Incremental costs for natural gas infrastructure to a single family building are presented in Table 6 through Table 11.

These costs are applied as cost savings for an all-electric home when compared to a mixed fuel home. This is the component with the highest degree of variability for all-electric homes. These costs are project dependent and may be significantly impacted by such factors as utility territory, site characteristics, distance to the nearest natural gas main and main location, joint trenching, whether work is conducted by the utility or a private contractor, and number of dwelling units per development. All gas utilities participating in this study were solicited for cost information. The CA IOU costs for single family homes presented are based primarily on cost data provided by PG&E.

Table 6 presents assumed gas main distribution line extension costs within gas CA IOU territory. Total distribution line extension costs are based on cost data provided by PG&E for new greenfield development. Total costs are reduced to account for deductions per the Utility Gas Main Extensions rules. 10 These rules categorize distribution line extensions as “refundable” costs, which are offset or subsidized by all other ratepayers. Refundable costs are first subsidized by appliance allowances, which are defined in Table 7. If there are additional costs in excess of the allowances, the developer has the option to either be refunded for the remaining amount over ten years or receive a 50 percent discount at time of application. The latter discount option is assumed in this analysis and is more commonly used by developers (California Public Utilities Commission, 2022). Two scenarios are presented in Table 6 since the appliance allowances differ by type of appliance. One is for the base case home with a prescriptive heat pump space heater which assumes a gas water heater, gas cooking, and gas clothes dryer (Climate Zones 3, 4, 13, and 14). The second is for the base case home with a prescriptive heat pump water heater which assumes a gas furnace, gas cooking, and gas clothes dryer. and a natural gas furnace for space heating (Climate Zones 1, 2, 5 through 12, 15, and 16).

The costs less the deductions were applied under the On-Bill cost-effectiveness methodology. The total costs before the deductions were applied under the TDV cost-effectiveness methodology to better reflect the full cost of gas main extensions since the deductions are subsidized by ratepayers and recovered via revenue from customers. This follows the analysis approach in the 2019 reach code study (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2019) and was based on input received from the Energy Commission and agreement from the Reach Codes technical advisory team that the approach is appropriate. TDV cost savings impacts extend beyond the customer and account for societal impacts of energy use. Accounting for the full cost of the infrastructure upgrades was determined to be justified when evaluating under the TDV methodology.

The CPUC issued a Proposed Decision in August 2022 that recommends eliminating the subsidies effective July 1, 2023. At the time of publishing this report there had been no ruling on this decision and therefore this analysis assumes the existing rules will remain in place through the 2022 code cycle. A sensitivity analysis of how the results would change if the Proposed Decision were adopted is included in the results of this report. 10 PG&E Rule 15: https://www.pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/tariffbook/GAS_RULES_15.pdf.

SoCalGas Rule 20: https://www.socalgas.com/regulatory/tariffs/tm2/pdf/20.pdf.

SDG&E Rule 15: https://tariff.sdge.com/tm2/pdf/GAS_GAS-RULES_GRULE15.pdf.

Page 120 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
17 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 6. Single Family IOU Natural Gas Main Distribution Line Extension Costs Total
Less Gas Extension Rule
Deductions1
PG&E SoCalGas SDG&E
Gas Water Heater Base $1,020 $0 $13 $0
Gas Space Heater Base $0 $0 $0
1After Utility Gas Main Extension Rule deductions.

Table 7. Residential IOU Gas Line Extension Appliance Allowances Appliance PG&E SoCalGas SDG&E
Water Heating $1,391 $682 $1,138
Space Heating $987 $818 $987
Oven/Range $84 $152 $201
Dryer Stub $24 $160 $289
Total - Gas Water Heater Base $1,499 $994 $1,628
Total – Gas Space Heater Base $1,095 $1,130 $1,477
Table 8 presents costs for the extension of service lines from a main distribution line to the home within gas CA IOU territory. These costs are based on data provided by PG&E excluding trenching. Costs are presented separately for a new subdivision in an undeveloped area as well as an infill development. The service extension is typically more costly in an infill scenario due to the disruption of existing roads, sidewalks, and other structures. For this analysis an average of the new subdivision and infill development costs was used, representing 80 percent of the new subdivision and 20 percent infill.

Table 8. Single Family IOU Natural Gas Service Line Extension Costs New
Subdivision
Infill
Development
Average
(80% New, 20% Infill)
$1,300 $6,750 $2,390
Table 9 presents other relative costs within gas CA IOU territory including gas meter installation and IOU plan review.

These costs are based on data provided by PG&E.

Table 9. Single Family IOU Other Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs Meter $300
Plan Review $850
Table 10 presents total costs including distribution and service line extensions, meter installation and plan review for the three gas CA IOUs for the two base case scenarios. Costs are based on the average service line extension costs from Table 8. For the single family analysis, based on the Reach Codes Team's conversations with the industry it is assumed that no upgrades to the electrical panel are required and that a 200 Amp panel is typically installed for both mixed fuel and all-electric homes.

Page 121 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
18 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 10. Single Family IOU Total Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs1 Total Less Gas Extension Rule
Deductions2
PG&E SoCalGas SDG&E
Total - Gas Water Heater Base $4,560 $3,540 $3,553 $3,540 Total - Gas Space Heater Base $3,540 $3,540 $3,540
1Based on average service line extension costs from Table 8. 1After Utility Gas Main Extension Rule deductions.

CPAU provides gas service to its customers and therefore separate costs were evaluated based on CPAU gas service connection fees. 11 Table 11 presents the breakdown of gas infrastructure costs used in this analysis for CPAU. There is no main distribution line component since Palo Alto has little greenfield space remaining and most of the development is infill.

Table 11. Single Family CPAU Total Natural Gas Infrastructure Costs Item Cost
Service Extension $5,892
Meter $1,012
Plan Review Costs $924
Total $7,828
Table 12 presents incremental costs for natural gas infrastructure for the detached ADU. These costs are directly from the 2019 detached ADU reach code report (Statewide Reach Codes Team, 2021b) and were obtained from interviews and RS Means. For the ADU scenario it’s assumed that natural gas already exists on the lot and is being extended to the location of the ADU typically at the back of the lot. There are incremental cost savings for an all-electric ADU from not extending the natural gas service; however, there is also a small incremental cost for upgrading the electric service to accommodate the additional electrical load. The Reach Codes Team found that a new detached ADU would require that the building owner upgrade the service connection to the lot in both the mixed-fuel ADU design and the all-electric design. The most common size for this upgrade is to upsize the existing panel to 225A, which would not represent an incremental cost from the mixed-fuel project to the all-electric project. Feeder wiring to the ADU and the ADU subpanel will need to be slightly upgraded for the all-electric design. 11 CPAU Schedule G-5 effective 09-01-2019: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/utilities/utilitiesengineering/general-specifications/gas-service-connection-fees.pdf

Page 122 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
19 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 12. ADU Utility Infrastructure Costs
Mixed Fuel Measure Mixed Fuel
Cost All-Electric Measure All-Electric Cost
All-Electric
Incremental Cost
Site natural gas service
extension $1,998 No site natural gas service $0 ($1,998) Site electrical service
connection upgrade 225A $3,500
Site electrical service
connection upgrade 225A $3,500 $0
100A feeder to ADU with
breaker $933
125A feeder to ADU with
breaker $1,206 $273
100A ADU subpanel $733 125A ADU subpanel $946 $213
Totals $7,164 $5,652 ($1,512)
Equipment lifetimes applied in this analysis for the water heating and space conditioning measures are summarized in Table 13. The lifetime for the heat pump, furnace, and air conditioner are based on the Database for Energy Efficient Resources (DEER) (California Public Utilities Commission, 2021b). In DEER, heat pump and air conditioner measures are assigned an effective useful lifetime (EUL) of 15 years and a furnace an EUL of 20 years. The heating and cooling system components are typically replaced at the same time when one reaches the end of its life and the other is near it. Therefore, it is assumed that both the furnace and air conditioner are replaced at the same time at year 17.5, halfway between 15 and 20 years. For HVAC system costing, air-conditioning is included in all cases in both the base case and proposed models. Present value replacement costs are included in the total lifetime incremental costs.

Table 13: Lifetime of Water Heating & Space Conditioning Equipment Measures Measure Lifetime
Gas Furnace 17.5
Air Conditioner 17.5
Heat Pump 15
Gas Tankless Water Heater 20
Heat Pump Water Heater 15
Appliance incremental costs are shown in Table 14 and Table 15. Replacement costs are applied to HVAC and DHW equipment over the 30-year evaluation period. Costs were estimated to reflect costs to the building owner. All costs are provided as present value in 2023 (2023 PV$). Costs due to variations in furnace, air conditioner, and heat pump capacity by climate zone were not accounted for.

The Reach Codes Team determined that the typical first installed cost for electric appliances is similar to that for natural gas appliances. Cost differences include equipment cost and installation, costs for natural gas piping from the meter to the appliance, and costs for electrical wiring to service the appliances.

Space Heater: Typical HVAC incremental costs were based on material costs from the AC Wholesalers website and labor costs from 2022 RS Means. In most cases the Reach Codes Team found that the material costs were slightly higher for the heat pump, but the labor costs were slightly higher for the gas furnace/AC installation. Costs were calculated for capacities ranging from a 2-ton to a 5-ton and the incremental costs used in this study were based on a weighted average of the expected nominal capacities from CBECC-Res autosizing results for the 2,100 square foot prototype. Incremental replacement costs for the heat pump are based on a 17.5-year lifetime for the gas furnace and air conditioner and a 15-year lifetime for the heat pump. Residual value of the gas furnace/AC at the end of the 30-year analysis period was accounted for to represent the remaining life of the equipment.

Page 123 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
20 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Water Heater: Various cost sources were reviewed and the Reach Codes Team determined that installed first costs for a garage installed tankless gas water heater and HPWH are very similar and no incremental cost was applied for the equipment and installation (see below for details on costs for gas piping and electrical wiring). This accounts for slightly higher equipment costs for the HPWH but lower installation labor due to the elimination of the combustion gas venting.

Incremental replacement costs account for a 15-year HPWH lifetime and a 20-year lifetime for the gas tankless water heater. Residual value of the gas tankless at the end of the 30-year analysis period was accounted for to represent the remaining life of the equipment. For the ADU analysis the water heater is evaluated within the conditioned space with the supply air ducted from the outside. An HVAC contractor provided a cost estimate for supply air ducting through the wall in an ADU where the water heater is in an interior room adjacent to an exterior wall. The estimated total cost for this was $652.

A high efficiency HPWH that meets the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA) 12 Tier 3 rating was also evaluated. HPWHs certified to meet NEEA Tier 3 or Tier 4 are the dominant product on the market today. According to NEEA all major HPWH manufacturers are represented in NEEA’s qualified product list 13 and there are only 11 listed products certified as Tier 1 or Tier 2. 14 While the Reach Codes Team evaluated a HPWH that just meets the federal minimum efficiency standards of close to 2.0 UEF to satisfy federal preemption requirements, the Reach Codes Team is not aware of any 2.0 UEF products that are available. The Reach Codes Team was unable to find any of the Tier 1 or Tier2 HPWHs for sale online and was unable to find any products for sale online that were not NEEA Tier 3 or Tier 4 certified. As a result, no incremental cost is assumed for a NEEA Tier 3 product versus a federal minimum efficiency product.

Clothes Dryer and Range: After review of various sources, the Reach Codes Team concluded that the cost difference between gas and electric resistance equipment for clothes dryers and stoves is negligible and that the lifetimes of the two technologies are also similar.

Electric Service Upgrade: The 2022 Title 24 Code requires electric readiness for gas appliances; as a result, the incremental costs to provide electrical service for electric appliances are minimal. The incremental costs accounted for in this study are calculated as the cost to install 220V service for the electric appliances less the cost for the electric ready requirements and for installing 110V service for the comparable gas appliance. Incremental costs are applied for the space heater, water heater, and cooking range. Based on builder surveys, it’s assumed that in a typical mixed fuel home both electric and gas service are provided to the dryer location and therefore no incremental costs for the dryer were applied. Costs assume 50A service for the range and 30A service for the space heater and water heater. Costs are assumed to be the same for the single family and ADU analyses.

In-House Natural Gas Infrastructure (from meter to appliances): Installation cost to run a natural gas line from the meter to the appliance location was estimated at $580 per appliance. These costs were based on material costs from Home Depot and labor costs from 2022 RS Means. The material costs were about 1/3 higher in RS Means than Home Depot, so the Reach Codes Team used the lower costs from Home Depot. The Reach Codes Team conducted a pipe sizing analysis for the two single family and one ADU prototype homes to estimate the length and diameter of gas piping required assuming the home included a gas furnace, gas tankless water heater, gas range, and gas dryer. Total estimated costs were very similar for each of the three prototypes and an average cost per appliance of $580 was determined. Costs are assumed to be the same for the single family and ADU analyses. 12 Based on operational challenges experienced in the past, NEEA established rating test criteria to ensure newly installed HPWHs perform adequately, especially in colder climates. The NEEA rating requires products comply with ENERGY STAR and includes requirements regarding noise and prioritizing heat pump use over supplemental electric resistance heating.
13 https://neea.org/success-stories/heat-pump-water-heaters 14 https://neea.org/img/documents/residential-unitary-HPWH-qualified-products-list.pdf

Page 124 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
21 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 14. Single Family All-Electric Appliance Incremental Costs Measure
Incremental Cost (2023 PV$)
First Cost Replacement
Cost
Total Lifetime
Financed
Heat Pump vs Gas Furnace/Split AC
Equipment & Installation ($151) $703 $533
Electric Service Upgrade $43 $0 $49
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($688) $703 ($69)
Heat Pump Water Heater vs Gas Tankless
Equipment & Installation $0 $652 $652
Electric Service Upgrade $43 $0 $49
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($537) $652 $49
NEEA Tier 3 HPWH vs Federal Minimum HPWH
Equipment $0 $0 $0
Total $0 $0 $0
Electric Resistance vs Gas Cooking
Equipment & Installation $0 $0 $0
Electric Service Upgrade $100 $0 $113
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($480) $0 ($539)
Electric Resistance vs Gas Clothes Drying
Equipment & Installation $0 $0 $0
Electric Service Upgrade $0 $0 $0
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($580) $0 ($651)

Page 125 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
22 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 15. ADU All-Electric Appliance Incremental Costs
Measure
Incremental Cost (2023 PV$)
First Cost Replacement
Cost
Total Lifetime
Financed
Heat Pump vs Gas Furnace/Split AC
Equipment & Installation ($151) $703 $533
Electric Service Upgrade $43 $0 $49
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($688) $703 ($69)
Heat Pump Water Heater vs Gas Tankless
Equipment & Installation $652 $652 $1,384
Electric Service Upgrade $43 $0 $49
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total $115 $652 $781
NEEA Tier 3 HPWH vs Federal Minimum HPWH
Equipment $0 $0 $0
Total $0 $0 $0
Electric Resistance vs Gas Cooking
Equipment & Installation $0 $0 $0
Electric Service Upgrade $100 $0 $113
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($480) $0 ($539)
Electric Resistance vs Gas Clothes Drying
Equipment & Installation $0 $0 $0
Electric Service Upgrade $0 $0 $0
In-House Gas Piping ($580) $0 ($651)
Total ($580) $0 ($651)

3.4 Measure Packages
The Reach Codes Team evaluated three packages for mixed fuel homes and five packages for all-electric homes for each prototype and climate zone, as described below.

1. All-Electric Code Minimum: This package meets all the prescriptive requirements of the 2022 Title 24 Code. In some instances, the prescriptive minimum package did not comply with code and efficiency measures were added to meet minimum compliance requirements. The added efficiency measures can be found in Table 45 and Table 46.

2. Efficiency Only: This package uses only efficiency measures that don’t trigger federal preemption issues including envelope and water heating or duct distribution efficiency measures.

3. Efficiency + NEEA (Preempted): This package was evaluated for the all-electric homes only and shows an alternative design that applies water heating equipment that is more efficient than federal standards meeting the NEEA Tier 3 rating. The Reach Codes Team considers this more reflective of how builders meet above code requirements in practice.

4. Efficiency + PV: Using the Efficiency Package as a starting point, PV capacity was added to offset most of the estimated electricity use.

Page 126 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Prototypes, Measure Packages, and Costs
23 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

5. Efficiency + PV + Battery: Using the Efficiency & PV Package as a starting point, a battery system was added.

For mixed-fuel homes the package of efficiency measures differed from the Efficiency Package in some climate zones to arrive at a cost effective solution.

Page 127 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Results
24 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 4 Results

4.1 2022 Metrics and Compliance
The Reach Codes Team evaluated the compliance impacts of a prescriptive all-electric home as well as a traditional mixed fuel home with four gas appliances (space heating, water heating, cooking, clothes drying). Compliance is relative to the 2022 prescriptive base case home with three gas appliances. The impacts for the single family home and the ADU are presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. The all-electric single family home prototype is code compliant with both EDR1 (source energy) and efficiency EDR2 (TDV energy) in all climate zones except Climate Zones 15 and 16. In addition to this climate zone, the all-electric ADU is also not compliant in Climate Zones 4 through 10 and 13 through 15. The four gas appliance single family home is presented in Figure 3. This case is not code compliant in any climate zone.

This analysis illustrates a couple of interesting points. One is that the new 2022 compliance metrics are important drivers encouraging electrification. The compliance penalties assessed the four gas appliance home scenarios are significant and will require deep efficiency measures to overcome. Another is that the 2022 Title 24 Code’s new source energy metric combined with the heat pump baseline encourage all-electric construction, providing a compliance benefit, at least in larger homes, that allows for some amount of prescriptively required building efficiency to be traded off and still comply when using the performance method.

Figure 1: Single Family All-Electric Home Compliance Impacts -5
0 5
10 15
20 25
CZ01 CZ02 CZ03 CZ04 CZ05 CZ06 CZ07 CZ08 CZ09 CZ10 CZ11 CZ12 CZ13 CZ14 CZ15 CZ16 EDR Margin
All-Electric Prescrip�ve
Source (EDR1) TDV (EDR2 Efficiency)

Page 128 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction Results
25 localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Figure 2: ADU All-Electric Home Compliance Impacts
Figure 3: Single Family Four Gas Appliance Home Compliance Impacts -6
-4
-2
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 CZ01 CZ02 CZ03 CZ04 CZ05 CZ06 CZ07 CZ08 CZ09 CZ10 CZ11 CZ12 CZ13 CZ14 CZ15 CZ16 EDR Margin
All-Electric Prescrip�ve
Source (EDR1) TDV (EDR2 Efficiency)
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0 2
CZ01 CZ02 CZ03 CZ04 CZ05 CZ06 CZ07 CZ08 CZ09 CZ10 CZ11 CZ12 CZ13 CZ14 CZ15 CZ16 EDR Margin
Mixed Fuel Prescrip�ve, 4 Gas Appliances
Source (EDR1) TDV (EDR2 Efficiency)

Page 129 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 26 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

4.2 All-Electric Code Minimum Results
Table 16 shows results for the single family all-electric code minimum case compared to the 2022 baseline. This package reflects the prescriptive minimum requirements except in Climate Zones 15 and 16, where efficiency measures were added to meet minimum code compliance. Utility cost savings are negative, indicating an increase in utility costs for the all-electric building, in all cases except in CPAU and SMUD territories. In all cases the incremental cost is negative, which reflects a cost savings for the all-electric building due to eliminating the gas infrastructure costs. The package is cost effective based on TDV in all cases; however, it’s only cost-effective On-Bill in Climate Zones 4 in CPAU territory, 6, 8, 9, 12 in SMUD territory, and 15.

Table 17 shows the all-electric code minimum case results for the ADU. This package reflects the prescriptive minimum requirements except in Climate Zones 4 through 10 and 13 through 16, where efficiency measures were added to meet minimum code compliance. The conclusions related to cost-effectiveness are similar for the ADU as for the single family analysis.

A summary of measures included in each package is provided in Appendix 7.3 Summary of Measures by Package. The efficiency measures added to the allelectric package to meet minimum code requirements are described in Table 45 and Table 46.

Page 130 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 27 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 16. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Code Minimum Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Efficiency
EDR2
Margin
Annual
Elec
Savings
(kWh)
Annual
Gas
Savings
(therms)
Average
Annual GHG
Reductions
(metric tons)
Utility Cost Savings Incremental Cost On-Bill TDV
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV
CZ01 PGE 8.3 -4,628 400 1.5 ($721) ($10,848) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.5 ($5,614) >1 $5,566 CZ02 PGE 5.7 -3,170 247 0.8 ($581) ($10,060) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.5 ($4,826) >1 $5,390 CZ03 PGE 4.7 -2,413 171 0.7 ($510) ($9,954) ($5,136) ($5,116) 0.5 ($4,838) 63.5 $4,414 CZ04 PGE 3.7 -2,233 163 0.7 ($455) ($8,756) ($5,136) ($5,116) 0.6 ($3,641) >1 $4,929 CZ04 CPAU 3.7 -2,233 163 0.7 $21 $3,274 ($9,424) ($9,931) >1 $13,205 >1 $9,217 CZ05 PGE 1.1 -2,123 133 0.4 ($452) ($8,930) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.6 ($3,696) 2.5 $2,776 CZ05 PGE/SCG 1.1 -2,123 133 0.4 ($455) ($9,027) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.6 ($3,793) 2.5 $2,776 CZ06 SCE/SCG 2.5 -1,481 84 0.3 ($269) ($5,120) ($5,288) ($5,234) 1.0 $115 3.2 $3,142 CZ07 SDGE 2.3 -1,328 69 0.2 ($456) ($10,904) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.5 ($5,670) 3.1 $3,081 CZ08 SCE/SCG 0.6 -1,331 67 0.2 ($249) ($4,864) ($5,288) ($5,234) 1.1 $371 2.8 $2,951 CZ09 SCE 1.2 -1,513 85 0.3 ($269) ($5,109) ($5,288) ($5,234) 1.0 $126 3.3 $3,179 CZ10 SCE/SCG 1.1 -1,777 107 0.3 ($307) ($5,720) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.9 ($486) 3.5 $3,285 CZ10 SDGE 1.1 -1,777 107 0.3 ($657) ($15,474) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.3 ($10,239) 3.5 $3,285 CZ11 PGE 3.5 -2,934 227 0.7 ($444) ($7,106) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.7 ($1,872) >1 $5,135 CZ12 PGE 4.0 -2,751 213 0.7 ($437) ($7,213) ($5,288) ($5,234) 0.7 ($1,979) >1 $5,002 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 4.0 -2,751 213 0.7 $58 $4,526 ($5,288) ($5,234) >1 $9,761 >1 $5,002 CZ13 PGE 2.1 -2,099 154 0.6 ($383) ($7,136) ($5,136) ($5,116) 0.7 ($2,021) >1 $4,904 CZ14 SCE/SCG 1.6 -2,301 159 0.6 ($411) ($7,590) ($5,136) ($5,116) 0.7 ($2,475) >1 $4,493 CZ14 SDGE 1.6 -2,301 159 0.6 ($914) ($21,350) ($5,149) ($5,130) 0.2 ($16,219) >1 $4,506 CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.6 -944 53 0.2 ($165) ($3,084) ($5,407) ($5,369) 1.7 $2,285 10.3 $4,247 CZ16 PG&E 6.0 -4,314 404 1.5 ($545) ($6,642) ($3,257) ($2,954) 0.4 ($3,687) >1 $3,139

Page 131 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 28 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 17. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Code Minimum Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Efficiency
EDR2
Margin
Annual
Elec
Savings
(kWh)
Annual
Gas
Savings
(therms)
Average
Annual GHG
Reductions
(metric tons)
Utility Cost
Savings Incremental Cost On-Bill TDV
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV
CZ01 PGE 0.0 -1,832 114 0.4 ($346) ($6,791) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.4 ($3,834) 1.2 $489 CZ02 PGE 0.4 -1,380 75 0.2 ($353) ($7,539) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.4 ($4,582) 1.2 $403 CZ03 PGE 0.0 -1,665 123 0.5 ($384) ($7,667) ($2,457) ($2,106) 0.3 ($5,560) 2.0 $888 CZ04 PGE 0.2 -1,591 118 0.5 ($351) ($6,970) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.4 ($4,013) 15.9 $2,395 CZ04 CPAU 0.2 -1,591 118 0.5 $42 $3,285 ($3,260) ($2,957) >1 $6,242 15.9 $2,395 CZ05 PGE 0.4 -1,031 49 0.1 ($268) ($5,966) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.5 ($3,009) 1.2 $460 CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.4 -1,031 49 0.1 ($226) ($4,656) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.6 ($1,699) 1.2 $460 CZ06 SCE/SCG 0.2 -909 38 0.1 ($215) ($4,435) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.7 ($1,478) 1.4 $666 CZ07 SDGE 0.4 -879 37 0.1 ($384) ($9,528) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.3 ($6,571) 1.4 $771 CZ08 SCE/SCG 0.6 -864 36 0.1 ($212) ($4,397) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.7 ($1,489) 1.5 $876 CZ09 SCE 0.6 -901 38 0.1 ($190) ($3,861) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.8 ($953) 1.6 $896 CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.4 -962 43 0.1 ($184) ($3,663) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.8 ($755) 1.7 $1,055 CZ10 SDGE 0.4 -962 43 0.1 ($404) ($9,951) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.3 ($7,043) 1.7 $1,055 CZ11 PGE 0.2 -1,322 71 0.2 ($297) ($6,281) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.5 ($3,324) 1.5 $843 CZ12 PGE 0.3 -1,283 69 0.2 ($298) ($6,354) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.5 ($3,397) 1.4 $716 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 0.3 -1,283 69 0.2 ($75) ($1,053) ($3,260) ($2,957) 2.8 $1,904 1.4 $716 CZ13 PGE 0.1 -1,594 112 0.4 ($296) ($5,748) ($3,260) ($2,957) 0.5 ($2,791) 11.3 $2,330 CZ14 SCE/SCG 0.4 -1,658 115 0.4 ($282) ($5,107) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.6 ($2,199) 12.6 $2,313 CZ14 SDGE 0.4 -1,658 115 0.4 ($455) ($10,294) ($3,216) ($2,908) 0.3 ($7,386) 12.6 $2,313 CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.3 -783 36 0.1 ($146) ($2,872) ($3,216) ($2,908) 1.0 $35 2.3 $1,408 CZ16 PG&E 0.1 -1,807 122 0.4 ($348) ($6,698) ($2,640) ($2,261) 0.3 ($4,437) 1.0 $22

Page 132 of 233 ends

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 29 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

4.3 All-Electric Plus Efficiency, PV, and Battery Results Table 18 and Table 19 compare cost-effectiveness results for the all-electric packages for the single family and ADU prototypes, respectively. In all cases the packages are cost effective based on TDV. On-Bill cost effectiveness generally improves with the addition of efficiency measures, improves significantly with an upsized PV system, and then declines again once batteries are added.

Table 18. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Energy Efficiency + Additional PV + Battery Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
All Electric Efficiency All Electric Efficiency + NEEA All Electric Efficiency + PV All Electric Efficiency + PV + Battery
On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV CZ01 PGE 0.7 ($1,256) >1 $8,122 4.0 $2,407 >1 $10,497 2.8 $22,471 1.9 $9,517 1.5 $11,220 1.4 $9,062 CZ02 PGE 0.6 ($1,957) >1 $7,579 1.1 $236 >1 $8,957 3.5 $16,261 2.9 $10,678 1.3 $4,955 1.9 $13,716 CZ03 PGE 0.5 ($3,826) >1 $4,674 0.6 ($1,851) >1 $6,023 3.5 $10,584 2.9 $7,145 0.96 ($685) 1.6 $9,058 CZ04 PGE 0.5 ($3,085) >1 $5,328 0.7 ($1,599) >1 $6,220 3.7 $9,560 3.7 $8,348 0.9 ($1,607) 1.8 $10,519 CZ04 CPAU >1 $12,524 >1 $9,616 >1 $13,328 >1 $10,508 >1 $13,692 >1 $12,636 1.4 $3,815 2.6 $14,807 CZ05 PGE 0.6 ($2,601) 12.6 $3,140 1.1 $363 >1 $5,239 4.9 $11,566 3.3 $6,058 1.0 $583 1.6 $7,976 CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.6 ($2,698) 12.6 $3,140 1.1 $266 >1 $5,239 4.8 $11,469 3.3 $6,058 1.0 $486 1.6 $7,976 CZ06 SCE/SCG 0.9 ($500) 21.3 $2,785 1.2 $554 >1 $3,582 5.3 $6,705 4.9 $5,331 0.96 ($530) 1.6 $7,663 CZ07 SDGE 0.4 ($5,221) 6.1 $2,929 0.5 ($3,795) >1 $3,706 13.2 $11,129 7.2 $4,840 0.97 ($355) 1.5 $6,158 CZ08 SCE/SCG 1.0 $129 8.8 $3,006 1.4 $1,028 >1 $3,618 10.2 $6,404 10.7 $5,797 0.99 ($82) 1.8 $8,401 CZ09 SCE 0.996 ($14) 102.1 $3,357 1.3 $959 >1 $4,073 8.5 $7,052 8.7 $6,238 1.1 $626 1.9 $10,710 CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.9 ($403) >1 $3,475 1.2 $668 >1 $4,260 5.5 $7,389 5.5 $6,432 1.1 $1,597 1.7 $7,804 CZ10 SDGE 0.3 ($9,171) >1 $3,475 0.3 ($7,637) >1 $4,260 8.4 $12,063 5.5 $6,432 1.0 $514 1.7 $7,804 CZ11 PGE 1.1 $356 >1 $6,751 2.9 $1,988 >1 $7,863 3.9 $15,570 3.1 $9,509 1.3 $4,736 1.8 $12,035 CZ12 PGE 0.8 ($923) >1 $5,727 1.4 $840 >1 $6,925 3.8 $14,386 2.9 $8,684 1.2 $3,221 1.8 $11,629 CZ12 SMUD/PGE >1 $8,792 >1 $5,727 >1 $9,445 >1 $6,925 3.2 $11,636 2.9 $8,684 1.1 $1,351 1.8 $11,629 CZ13 PGE 1.0 ($134) >1 $6,391 1.7 $1,204 >1 $7,315 4.5 $12,333 3.9 $8,944 1.1 $1,808 1.9 $12,609 CZ14 SCE/SCG 0.96 ($226) >1 $6,168 2.6 $1,429 >1 $7,337 3.5 $11,205 3.8 $10,769 1.4 $6,530 1.9 $13,315 CZ14 SDGE 0.2 ($12,027) >1 $6,181 0.2 ($8,562) >1 $7,350 4.2 $14,424 3.8 $10,782 1.2 $2,882 1.9 $13,328 CZ15 SCE/SCG 3.2 $2,088 >1 $4,185 10.7 $2,739 >1 $4,639 >1 $5,871 >1 $5,572 1.2 $2,471 1.7 $7,367 CZ16 PG&E 0.3 ($2,843) >1 $3,675 0.5 ($1,291) >1 $4,277 3.1 $22,017 1.9 $8,576 1.5 $10,722 1.6 $11,922 Page 133 of 233 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 30 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12 Table 19. ADU Cost-Effectiveness: All-Electric Energy Efficiency + Additional PV + Battery Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
All Electric Efficiency Only All Electric Efficiency + NEEA All Electric Efficiency + PV All Electric Efficiency + PV + Battery On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV On-Bill TDV
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV CZ01 PGE 0.3 ($2,010) >1 $1,155 2.5 $610 >1 $3,162 2.2 $16,861 1.2 $2,976 1.2 $5,286 1.0 $168 CZ02 PGE 0.2 ($4,208) 3.3 $481 0.3 ($2,696) >1 $1,403 2.5 $15,218 1.5 $4,707 1.2 $3,791 1.3 $6,522 CZ03 PGE 0.1 ($6,115) 14.1 $325 0.1 ($4,828) >1 $1,206 2.3 $12,653 1.5 $4,249 1.1 $1,285 1.2 $4,720 CZ04 PGE 0.0 ($5,883) 20.7 $992 0.0 ($4,940) 34.2 $1,672 2.3 $13,081 1.7 $6,179 1.1 $1,797 1.4 $6,977 CZ04 CPAU >1 $3,951 20.7 $992 >1 $4,509 34.2 $1,672 1.7 $6,738 1.7 $6,179 0.8 ($4,973) 1.4 $6,977 CZ05 PGE 0.3 ($4,141) 0.6 ($698) 0.3 ($2,912) 1.3 $222 2.9 $15,238 1.5 $3,921 1.2 $3,903 1.2 $3,473 CZ05 PGE/SCG 0.3 ($2,831) 0.6 ($698) 0.5 ($1,602) 1.3 $222 3.1 $16,548 1.5 $3,921 1.3 $5,212 1.2 $3,473 CZ06 SCE/SCG 0.4 ($2,272) 0.996 ($5) 0.5 ($1,672) 1.7 $444 2.6 $11,941 1.8 $5,275 1.1 $2,134 1.3 $5,984 CZ07 SDGE 0.2 ($6,766) 1.0 $4 0.2 ($5,978) 1.7 $435 3.8 $22,595 1.6 $4,364 1.6 $11,005 1.2 $3,943 CZ08 SCE/SCG 0.4 ($2,380) 0.98 ($23) 0.4 ($1,832) 1.4 $334 2.5 $12,446 1.9 $6,579 1.2 $2,991 1.4 $7,829 CZ09 SCE 0.4 ($1,858) 1.1 $53 0.5 ($1,255) 1.5 $367 2.6 $12,699 1.9 $6,334 1.2 $3,232 1.5 $9,406 CZ10 SCE/SCG 0.5 ($1,556) 1.4 $280 0.6 ($800) 4.9 $828 2.7 $3,430 2.1 $2,156 0.6 ($5,734) 1.2 $2,118 CZ10 SDGE 0.2 ($7,442) 1.4 $280 0.2 ($6,395) 4.9 $828 3.1 $4,264 2.1 $2,156 0.5 ($7,385) 1.2 $2,118 CZ11 PGE 0.3 ($2,749) >1 $1,115 0.4 ($1,634) >1 $1,901 2.1 $3,811 1.8 $2,577 0.5 ($7,415) 1.3 $4,046 CZ12 PGE 0.2 ($3,692) 3.1 $430 0.3 ($2,597) >1 $1,320 2.6 $16,095 1.6 $5,047 1.2 $4,800 1.3 $6,745 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 3.1 $645 3.1 $430 >1 $1,076 >1 $1,320 1.4 $4,399 1.6 $5,047 0.7 ($6,294) 1.3 $6,745 CZ13 PGE 0.0 ($3,425) 17.9 $1,657 0.0 ($2,455) 25.7 $2,419 1.7 $2,505 1.9 $3,158 0.4 ($8,653) 1.4 $5,829 CZ14 SCE/SCG 0.0 ($3,402) 4.0 $1,280 0.0 ($2,270) 6.0 $2,097 2.4 $13,741 2.0 $8,807 1.2 $5,041 1.5 $10,045 CZ14 SDGE 0.0 ($7,519) 4.0 $1,280 0.0 ($5,884) 6.0 $2,097 3.8 $28,555 2.0 $8,807 1.8 $16,912 1.5 $10,045 CZ15 SCE/SCG 1.0 ($47) >1 $1,212 1.3 $204 >1 $1,264 3.5 $3,155 2.9 $2,387 0.6 ($5,030) 1.3 $3,480 CZ16 PG&E 0.3 ($3,414) 9.9 $748 0.3 ($2,658) >1 $1,580 2.8 $19,246 1.7 $6,200 1.4 $7,856 1.4 $7,321 Page 134 of 233 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Single Family New Construction 31 Results
localenergycodes.com California Energy Codes & Standards | A statewide utility program 2022-09-12

4.4 Mixed Fuel Results
Table 20 and Table 21 show results for the Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery package compared to the 2022 baseline for Single Family and ADU, respectively. This package is cost-effective based on TDV everywhere for the single family prototype. It’s TDV cost-effective in most cases for the ADU with the exception of Climate Zones 1 and 10. The package is cost-effective On-Bill for the single family home only in Climate Zone 1. For the ADU the package is costeffective On-Bill in Climate Zones 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 12 in PG&E territory, 14, and 16. For the climate zones where there is no PV requirement in the base package, the addition of a new PV system substantially reduced utility costs and the high cost-effectiveness of the PV measure helped to offset the high cost of the battery system.

Table 20. Single Family Cost-Effectiveness: Mixed Fuel Efficiency + PV + Battery Climate
Zone
Electric
/Gas Utility
Efficiency
EDR2
Margin
Annual
Elec
Savings
(kWh)
Annual
Gas
Savings
(therms)
Average
Annual GHG
Reductions
(metric tons)
Utility Cost
Savings Incremental Cost On-Bill TDV
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
First
Year
Lifecycle
(2022$)
B/C
Ratio NPV B/C Ratio NPV
CZ01 PGE 30.0 1,577 118 1.1 $710 $18,829 $9,845 $17,192 1.1 $1,636 1.4 $5,664 CZ02 PGE 13.5 1,264 35 0.7 $419 $10,499 $8,951 $15,899 0.7 ($5,400) 1.4 $6,396 CZ03 PGE 11.2 1,073 7 0.6 $295 $7,072 $7,718 $14,333 0.5 ($7,261) 1.2 $2,956 CZ04 PGE 8.4 912 6 0.5 $244 $5,862 $8,056 $14,763 0.4 ($8,902) 1.2 $3,219 CZ04 CPAU 8.4 912 6 0.5 $159 $3,839 $8,056 $14,763 0.3 ($10,925) 1.2 $3,219 CZ05 PGE 16.8 1,186 43 0.8 $416 $10,571 $8,517 $15,361 0.7 ($4,790) 1.3 $4,171 CZ05 PGE/SCG 16.8 1,186 43 0.8 $394 $9,850 $8,517 $15,361 0.6 ($5,512) 1.3 $4,171 CZ06 SCE/SCG 9.2 894 6 0.5 $370 $8,721 $8,097 $14,780 0.6 ($6,059) 1.2 $3,134 CZ07 SDGE 8.3 841 4 0.5 $358 $9,129 $8,029 $14,709 0.6 ($5,579) 1.1 $1,612 CZ08 SCE/SCG 9.5 783 2 0.5 $381 $8,924 $7,494 $14,074 0.6 ($5,150) 1.3 $3,991 CZ09 SCE 8.6 839 3 0.5 $390 $9,148 $7,509 $14,094 0.6 ($4,946) 1.5 $5,914 CZ10 SCE/SCG 8.3 854 2 0.5 $416 $9,733 $7,139 $13,724 0.7 ($3,990) 1.2 $2,863 CZ10 SDGE 8.3 854 2 0.5 $314 $7,983 $7,139 $13,724 0.6 ($5,741) 1.2 $2,863 CZ11 PGE 11.0 1,034 27 0.7 $398 $9,903 $8,478 $15,286 0.6 ($5,383) 1.4 $5,505 CZ12 PGE 11.0 1,107 23 0.6 $364 $9,006 $8,733 $15,626 0.6 ($6,620) 1.4 $5,074 CZ12 SMUD/PGE 11.0 1,107 23 0.6 $252 $6,354 $8,733 $15,626 0.4 ($9,272) 1.4 $5,074 CZ13 PGE 9.6 1,168 5 0.6 $407 $9,736 $8,713 $15,536 0.6 ($5,801) 1.4 $5,562 CZ14 SCE/SCG 11.2 1,737 6 0.7 $663 $15,570 $9,664 $16,695 0.9 ($1,125) 1.4 $5,435 CZ14 SDGE 11.2 1,737 6 0.7 $403 $10,291 $9,664 $16,695 0.6 ($6,404) 1.4 $5,435 CZ15 SCE/SCG 8.5 532 2 0.5 $486 $11,372 $7,170 $13,536 0.8 ($2,164) 1.3 $3,451 CZ16 PG&E 22.6 1,235 115 1.2 $571 $15,439 $10,780 $18,007 0.9 ($2,568) 1.5 $8,024

Page 135 of 233 ends
← All documents from this meeting