231 TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES, INC. 9 DESCHUTES COUNTY RFPD NO.2 232 UMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 10 DESCHUTES PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM 233 UNION GOSPEL MISSION 11 EAST MULTNOMAH SOIL AND WATER CONSERVANCY 234 UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF OR AND SW WA 12 GASTON RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT 235 UNITED WAY OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE 13 GLADSTONE POLICE DEPARTMENT 236 US CONFERENCE OF MENONNITE BRETHREN CHURCHES 14 GLENDALE RURAL FIRE DISTRICT 237 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 15 HOODLAND FIRE DISTRICT NO.74 238 USAGENCIES CREDIT UNION 16 HOODLAND FIRE DISTRICT #74 239 VERMONT HILLS FAMILY LIFE CENTER 17 HOUSING AUTHORITY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY 240 VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER 18 KLAMATH COUNTY 9-1-1 241 VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OREGON 19 LANE EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT 242 WE CARE OREGON 20 LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT
243 WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY 21 MALIN COMMUNITY PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 244 WESTERN STATES CENTER 22 MARION COUNTY FIRE DISTRCT #1 245 WESTSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH 23 METRO
246 WILD SALMON CENTER 24 METROPOLITAN EXPOSITION-RECREATION COMMISSION 247 WILLAMETTE FAMILY 25 MONMOUTH - INDEPENDENCE NETWORK 248 WILLAMETTE VIEW INC. 26 MULTONAH COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT #1 249 WOODBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 27 NEAH KAH NIE WATER DISTRICT 250 WORD OF LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH 28 NW POWER POOL
251 WORKSYSTEMS INC 29 OAK LODGE WATER DISTRICT
252 YOUTH GUIDANCE ASSOC. 30 OR INT'L PORT OF COOS BAY
253 YWCA SALEM 31 PORT OF ST HELENS
1 ALOCHOLIC REHABILITATION SVS OF HI INC DBA HINA MAUKA 32 PORT OF UMPQUA 2 ALOHACARE 33 REGIONAL AUTOMATED INFORMATION NETWORK
3 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION 34 RIVERGROVE WATER DISTRICT 4 BISHOP MUSEUM 35 SALEM AREA MASS TRANSIT DISTRICT
5 BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF HAWAII 36 SANDY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 72 6 CTR FOR CULTURAL AND TECH INTERCHNG BETW EAST AND WEST 37 SUNSET EMPIRE PARK AND RECREATION 7 EAH, INC. 38 THE NEWPORT PARK AND RECREATION CENTER
8 EASTER SEALS HAWAII 39 THE PORT OF PORTLAND
9 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF HAWAII, INC. 40 TILLAMOOK PEOPLES UTILITY DISTRICT 10 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MAUI 41 TUALATIN HILLS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 11 HALE MAHAOLU 42 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE
12 HAROLD K.L. CASTLE FOUNDATION 43 TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 13 HAWAII AGRICULTURE RESEARCH CENTER 44 UNION SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 14 HAWAII EMPLOYERS COUNCIL 45 WEST MULTNOMAH SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 15 HAWAII FAMILY LAW CLINIC DBA ALA KUOLA 46 WEST VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY 16 HONOLULU HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 47 WILLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 17 IUPAT, DISTRICT COUNCIL 50 48 YOUNGS RIVER LEWIS AND CLARK WATER DISTRICT 18 LANAKILA REHABILITATION CENTER INC. No. State Agencies 19 LEEWARD HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 1 BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS 20 MAUI COUNTY FCU 2 OFFICE OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS 21 MAUI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD 3 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER 22 MAUI ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY, INC. 4 OREGON BOARD OF ARCHITECTS 23 MAUI FAMILY YMCA 5 OREGON CHILD DEVELOPMENT COALITION 24 NA HALE O MAUI 6 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
25 NA LEI ALOHA FOUNDATION 7 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY 26 NETWORK ENTERPRISES, INC. 8 OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 27 ORI ANUENUE HALE, INC. 9 OREGON DEPT. OF EDUCATION
28 PARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION 10 OREGON LOTTERY 29 POLYNESIAN CULTURAL CENTER 11 OREGON OFFICE OF ENERGY 30 PUNAHOU SCHOOL 12 OREGON STATE BOARD OF NURSING
31 ST. THERESA CHURCH 13 OREGON STATE POLICE
32 WAIANAE COMMUNITY OUTREACH 14 OREGON TOURISM COMMISSION 33 WAILUKU FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 15 OREGON TRAVEL INFORMATION COUNCIL 34 YMCA OF HONOLULU 16 SANTIAM CANYON COMMUNICATION CENTER No. Special/Independent Districts 17 SEIU LOCAL 503, OPEU 1 BAY AREA HOSPITAL DISTRICT 1 ADMIN. SERVICES OFFICE
2 CENTRAL OREGON INTERGOVERNMENTAL COUNCIL 2 HAWAII CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 3 CENTRAL OREGON IRRIGATION DISTRICT 3 HAWAII HEALTH SYSTEMS CORPORATION 4 CHEHALEM PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT 4 SOH- JUDICIARY CONTRACTS AND PURCH 5 CITY COUNTY INSURANCE SERVICES 5 STATE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 6 CLEAN WATER SERVICES 6 STATE OF HAWAII
7 COLUMBIA 911 COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT 7 STATE OF HAWAII 8 COLUMBIA RIVER PUD 8 STATE OF HAWAII, DEPT. OF EDUCATION
EXHIBIT “C”
WAXIE Authorization Email
From: Coiner, James
To: Lucero, Alexis; Alcantar, Maria
Subject: FW: [External Email] Waxie Email Authorization Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 7:49:20 AM
Attachments: image002.png
image003.png
Good morning, ladies, below is an email from Waxie accepting the terms of the contract.
Best,
James Coiner
From: Guy Fiandaca <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 7:47 AM
To: Coiner, James <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [External Email] Waxie Email Authorization
James,
Good morning and I hope your Monday went well.
On behalf of WAXIE Sanitary Supply, we accept the terms below, 3 years + 2 option years, (total of a 5-year contract).
We look forward to servicing the City of Montebello for the next fiscal year and we ensure that we will do our best to deliver outstanding results.
Thank you very much for this opportunity and have a great week.
It is WAXIE’s goal to ensure supplies are delivered to facilities where they are needed most in order to protect public health and minimize the risk of outbreak. To attain this goal, sales of high demand products related to COVID-19 will not be eligible for return to WAXIE. Due to current market conditions, pricing for disposable gloves is not guaranteed and may adjust at time of shipment. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
Click here for information, resources, products and solutions to fight COVID-19.
Click here to learn about the Global Supply Chain Impacts of COVID-19. ______________________________________________________
Guy Fiandaca | Account Executive
Office: (714) 545-8441 ext.511 / Cell: (909) 938-9416 / Fax: (714) 545-6870 [email protected] | www.waxie.com
WAXIE Sanitary Supply | The Most Trusted Name In Clean. Since 1945.
Discover WAXIE: Video | Facebook | Twitter | Blog | YouTube
CALIFORNIA | ARIZONA | NEVADA | UTAH | COLORADO | WASHINGTON | OREGON | IDAHO | ALASKA
From: Coiner, James <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 5:22 PM
To: Guy Fiandaca <[email protected]>
Subject: Waxie Email Authorization
ALERT: This message originated outside of Envoy Solutions' network. BE CAUTIOUS before clicking any link or attachment
Hello Guy,
Can you please send me an email with the following authorization:
Waxie is ok with a 3-year + 2 option year (total of 5-year contract); we need a current approval email authorizing a fiscal year (FY 2023-24).
James Coiner
Deputy Director Public Works
Public Works Department
984 Via San Clemente
Montebello, CA 90640
p: 323-887-1200 x378
e: [email protected]
ITEM # 15
CITY OF MONTEBELLO
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Arlene Salazar, Acting City Manager
BY: Fernando Pelaez, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 TABLE OF
ORGANIZATION/MASTER POSITION CONTROL TO ADD EIGHTEEN
(18.0) "FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC" FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT
POSITIONS
DATE: September 13, 2023
RECOMMENDATION(S):
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Amend the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Table of Organization/Master Position Control to add eighteen (18) "Firefighter/Paramedic" Full-Time Equivalent Positions; and
2. Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amending the table of Organization/Master Position Control to add eighteen (18) "Firefighter/Paramedic" positions is one of the steps necessary to implement the "EMS/Squad" staffing model presented to the City Council at a Regular Meeting on June 28, 2023, at a Special Meeting on July 20, 2023, and at a regular meeting on August 9, 2023 (Attachment A). At the July 20th meeting, City Council provided direction to implement the "EMS/Squad" staffing model, which would require subsequent City Council action to amend the table of organization as well as purchase additional vehicles and equipment. This item was presented at the August 9, 2023 meeting, at which time City Council deferred action and provided direction to Staff to bring the item back at the first meeting in September in order to provide Staff more time to present additional information surrounding the estimated costs of adding eighteen (18.0) Firefighter/Paramedics.
The annual fully-burdened rate (i.e., salary, special pays, benefits, etc.) for a newly hired Firefighter/Paramedic at Step 1 of the range is approximately $102,000. The addition of
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
eighteen "Firefighter/Paramedics" would cost approximately $1.9 million annually assuming all positions were filled. Currently, the Fire Department has sufficient staff in the "Firefighter/Paramedic" classification to begin implementing the "EMS/Squad" staffing model.
The annual, fully-burdened cost of adding 18.0 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Firefighter/Paramedics is estimated to be $1.9 million. At the August 9 meeting, it was pointed out that information available on "Transparent California" -- self-described as California's largest public pay and pension database -- indicated this $1.9 million estimate might not be "accurate." Estimating the fully-burdened cost of adding 18.0 FTE is part art, part science, and involves a wide range of assumptions. It is important to point out several factors about the data available on "Transparent California" that minimize its suitability for estimating actual costs of adding positions:
• "Total Pay and Benefits" data on "Transparent California" includes overtime pay, leave payouts (e.g., holiday, vacation, etc. allowed per approved MOUs), health and related benefit costs, and pension (i.e, PERS) expenses • The majority of current Montebello Fire Department safety employees qualify for various special pays such as longevity and education incentives that new hires would not immediately qualify for upon hiring
• The higher base pay of veteran Firefighter personnel impacts such things as overtime, longevity, leave pay outs, etc., which translates into higher "Total Pay and Benefits" amounts found for these employees on "Transparent California"
These and other factors lead to the "Total Pay and Benefits" data found on "Transparent California" being much higher than what would be representative of the fully burdened cost of a "new hire." Veteran employees earn a higher base pay than a newly hired Firefighter (i.e., they are at a higher step in their respective pay range). This higher base pay impacts all other pays calculated on the hourly rate: overtime, longevity, leave pay- outs, etc. In other words, a 10-plus year Firefighter/Paramedic veteran employee vs. a newly hired Firefighter/Paramedic would look much different on the "Transparent California" website. The veteran employee's "Total Pay and Benefits" would be markedly higher due to the compounding effect of the higher hourly base pay -- which impacts everything from overtime pay, special pays such as longevity and leave pay-out amounts.
Moreover, any employee hired since 2013 who is new to a PERS employer falls under Public Employees' Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) to determine retirement benefits. "Classic" PERS safety employees -- those with service pre-dating 2013, can retire as early as age 50, under the "3% @ 50" formula. PEPRA safety employees cannot retire until 57, and have a less generous retirement formula of "2.7% @ 57." This is a considerable difference to the defined benefit retirement formula, and makes PEPRA employees much more cost effective to the employer. That is, "2.7% @ 57" costs less to fund than the Classic formula of "3% @ 50." This is another reason why -- when analyzing the $1.9 million fully burdened cost of 18.0 FTE -- newly hired Firefighter/Paramedics cost less than their veteran counterparts. Moreover, the $1.9 million cost estimated was calculated assuming all new hires would be PEPRA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
employees -- a very safe assumption confirmed by the fact that 65% of current Fire Department employees are PEPRA.
Another factor to consider in attempting to estimate the total, annual cost of 18.0 additional FTE, is the current number of vacancies in the Fire Department. As of the publication of this agenda report, there are fifteen (15.0) vacancies across the ranks of Firefighter/Paramedic, Fire Engineer and Fire Captain. Adding the 18.0 new FTE would increase full-time vacancies within the safety ranks of the Department to 33.0. Human Resources manages the recruitment, screening and backgrounding of Fire employees, a process that can take up to six months per employee given the extensive amount of work involved in filling these important first-responder positions. Human Resources estimates they can fill approximately nine (9.0) vacancies in the Fire Department annually. Assuming there are no additional vacancies, it would take almost four years to fill the 33.0 vacancies. Once retirements and separations are factored in -- which continually add vacancies in the Department -- it could take five or more years to be fully staffed. This is similar to the vacancy situation in the Police Department in that there are full-time positions included in the organizational chart, although vacancies resulting from attrition are not predictable.
This natural pace of attrition and filling of vacancies ultimately impacts the annual total salary and benefits expenses in the Fire Department. Blending in the hiring of new employees at Step 1 of the salary scale who do not accrue certain special pays such as longevity or certificate incentives, and whose pension related expenses are much less than Classic PERS employees, it becomes clear that the $1.9 million annual cost estimate for 18.0 FTE is sufficient if the Department ever reached a "zero vacancy" state.
While full-time salaries and associated special pays will increase as vacancies are filled and new positions are added, overtime will be reduced. Overtime fluctuates with the number of vacancies, and trends inverse to the number of vacancies. Therefore, as the
15.0 current vacancies are filled, overtime expenses will be reduced, helping to offset the increase to full-time salaries and benefits. The estimated $1.9 million cost for 18.0 FTE would be offset somewhat through the reduction in overtime. As stated in previous presentations, staff overtime burnout is a safety concern and adding additional staff to address this is critical to the health and physical wellness of the veteran firefighters. Moreover, newly hired Fire personnel -- who would be at Step 1 of the salary range -- have lower overtime costs than longer-serving veteran employees who earn a higher base wage.
There is sufficient funding at the current time in the Fiscal Year 2023-24 adopted budget to implement the updated staffing model, and to continue hiring to fill vacancies at the "Firefighter/EMT" level (basic level). Moreover, given the necessity of a phased approach to implementing the staffing plan, the current salary and benefit budget will be sufficient. Staff will monitor the FY 2023-24 budget and if necessary, request City Council approval of budget amendments should current salary/benefit budgets not be sufficient. Future budgets (i.e., FY 2024-25, etc.) will be built based on the current (and planned) staffing at the time of budget development, taking into consideration the myriad factors presented in the preceding paragraphs that impact attrition, hiring and the overall
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
vacancy rate in the Department.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
At the Special City Council meeting on July 20, 2023 City Council authorized implementation of the Fire Department’s Emergency Medical Services delivery model.
This item was presented at the August 9, 2023 meeting, at which time City Council deferred action and provided direction to Staff to bring the item back at the first meeting in September in order to provide Staff more time to present additional information surrounding the estimated costs of adding eighteen (18.0) Firefighter/Paramedics.
The model included increasing full-time equivalent (FTE) positions in the “Firefighter/Paramedic” position based on staffing three, two-person squads across three shifts (i.e., 18.0 FTE). The Fire Department operates three (3) fire stations and has three (3) ALS Engines and one (1) ALS/BLS Ladder Truck, serving a community with a population of 61,200 spread out over 8.33 square miles. As the City continues to develop and expand, so does the need for public safety services to evolve along with the City’s fast-paced growth. The presentations on June 28 and July 20 provided information on how the staffing model would work, implementation timeline, and background on the necessity of bringing back this staffing model that had previously been used in Montebello.
The agenda report from August 9 has been updated to provide additional information surrounding the estimated cost of adding 18.0 FTE.The "Fiscal Impact" section of this report contains that additional information.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This item is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, sections:
15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment); 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378); and 15061(b)(3), because the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Because there is no possibility that this item may have a significant adverse effect on the environment, the item is exempt from CEQA.
ANALYSIS:
The updated staffing model includes re-structuring the Fire Department's organizational framework, increasing all-ranks staffing capacity by adding new positions (i.e., adding a "Firefighter/EMT" classification to the existing "Firefighter/Paramedic" classification currently identified as Firefighter on the Table of Organization and Master Position Control, Attachment A). In addition, updating the organizational response model to a "Fire Paramedic Rescue Squad" model requires the purchase and outfitting of Paramedic Rescue Squad vehicles. Action related to these procurements will be brought to City Council for review and recommended actions as a separate item.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
The Fire Department’s focus is hiring to fill vacancies in the Firefighter/EMT ranks. On- going recruitments are active for Firefighter/Paramedics, Firefighter/EMTs and Reserve (volunteer) Firefighters. In addition, the Department is able to sponsor recruits through Paramedic Training School, utilizing funding from the Estate of Fire Captain George Miller. The additional staffing of entry level resources (Firefighter/EMT) would provide much-needed operational infrastructure to support the Fire Department’s overall strategic goals in the delivery of life safety and emergency rescue services to the community. The additional Firefighter/EMT personnel would assist in minimizing impacts to fire resources responding to various emergencies in the community and help reduce "out of service" time of the City's emergency response units. Further, these positions would assist with addressing firefighter fatigue and meet future demand for fire services resulting from increased housing and population growth (residential, commercial, visitors).
SUMMARY:
Staff is implementing the updated Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response model per City Council direction by adding eighteen (18.0) FTE "Firefighter/Paramedic" positions to the Table of Organization/Master Position Control. One of the actions required to implement the staffing model is amending the Table of Organization/Master Position Control to add the additional positions (Attachment A). At this time, no budget amendment is needed, as the FY 2023-24 adopted budget has sufficient funding for anticipated staffing levels in the first part of the fiscal year. Staff will monitor the budget and if necessary, propose budget amendments to increase salary and benefit appropriations if zero vacancy is estimated to be achieved in the current fiscal year. Additional revenues are expected to offset the additional operational costs once the City implements ambulance services (transportation rights) in 2027. The bid for transportation rights is estimated to occur in 2025, and additional revenues should be derived from insurance reimbursements as part of the ambulance services program.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. ATTACHMENT A - Master Position Control, 09_13_2023
NEXT STEPS:
N/A
*POSITIONS ADDED AUGUST 9, 2023
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23
FY 2022-23
AMENDED
FY 2023-24
ADOPTED
FY 2023-24
AMENDED* Variance
Elected
City Councilmember 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
City Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
City Treasurer 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 0.0
Administration
City Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Assistant City Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Deputy City Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Deputy City Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Records Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Management Analyst 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Office Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Administrative Assistant 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
8.0 9.0 11.0 8.0 8.0 0.0
Finance
Director of Finance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Assistant Director or Finance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Accounting Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Finance Manager 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Management Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Management Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Accountant 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Accountant 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Lead Finance Technician 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Finance Technician 5.0 5.0 5.0 8.0 8.0 0.0
Finance Technician 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
21.0 22.0 22.0 24.0 24.0 0.0
Fire
Fire Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Assistant Fire Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Deputy Fire Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Fire Battalion Chief 3.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 0.0
Fire Captain 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 0.0
Fire Engineer 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0.0
Firefighter (EMT) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 0.0
Firefigher (Paramedic) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 18.0
Firefighter/Paramedic Trainee 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0
Fire Marshal 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Fire Inspector 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Fire Inspector 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Assistant Diretor of Fire 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Management Analyst* 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Public Saftey Radio Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Public Safetry Radio Technician 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Social Work Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Field Response Case Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Senior Administrative Assistant 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
76.0 76.0 76.0 80.0 98.0 18.0
City of Montebello
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget
Master Position Control, by Department
ATTACHMENT A
*POSITIONS ADDED AUGUST 9, 2023
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23
FY 2022-23
AMENDED
FY 2023-24
ADOPTED
FY 2023-24
AMENDED* Variance
City of Montebello
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget
Master Position Control, by Department
Human Resources
Director of Human Resources / Risk Management 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Assistant Director of Human Resources / Risk Management 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Principal Risk Officer 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Human Resources Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Risk Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Human Resources Analyst 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Human Resources Analyst 1.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 0.0
Human Resources Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Risk Management Assistant 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
14.0 16.0 18.0 15.0 15.0 0.0
Planning and Community Development
Director of Planning and Community Development 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0. 0 Assistant Director of Planning and Community Development 1.0 1.0 1 .0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Housing Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Planning Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Economic Development Manager 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Planner 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Assistant Planner 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Code Enforcement Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Code Enforcement Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Code Enforcement Officer 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0
Parking Control Officer 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Senior Management Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Management Analyst 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
21.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0
Police
Police Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Assistant Police Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Police Captain 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Police Lieutenant 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 0.0
Police Sergeant 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0
Police Corporal 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 0.0
Police Officer 32.0 32.0 32.0 36.0 36.0 0.0
Police Records Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Dispatch Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Police Dispatcher II 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Police Dispatcher I 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Police Records Technician 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 0.0
Property and Evidence Technician 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Crime Analyst 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Court Liaison 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Grants and Project Administrator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Senior Management Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 103.0 103.0 103.0 107.0 107.0 0.0
*POSITIONS ADDED AUGUST 9, 2023
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23
FY 2022-23
AMENDED
FY 2023-24
ADOPTED
FY 2023-24
AMENDED* Variance
City of Montebello
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget
Master Position Control, by Department
Public Works
Director of Public Works 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Assistant Director of Public Works 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Deputy Director 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Principal Engineer 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Assistant Engineer 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Traffic Engineer 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Building Official 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Combination Builidng Inspector 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Buiding Permit Technician 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Public Works Inspector 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Public Works Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Public Works Manager 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Park Maintenance Supervisor 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Street Maintenance Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Building Maintenance Tradeworker II 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Electrician 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Plumber 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Maintenance Worker 14.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 0.0
Senior Management Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Management Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
25.0 45.0 45.0 46.0 46.0 0.0
Public Affairs-Information Technology
Director of Public Affairs/Information Technology 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0. 0- 1 . 0 Senior Management Analyst 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Public Information Officer 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Senior Administrative Assistant 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Information Systems Manager 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Information Systems Supervisor 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Information Systems Analyst 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 10.0 -1.0
Recreation and Community Services
Director of Recreation and Community Services 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Assistant Director of Recreation and Community Services 1.0 1.0 1. 0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Recreation & Community Services Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0. 0 Recreation Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Recreation Supervisor 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Community Services Coordinator 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Management Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
21.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 0.0
*POSITIONS ADDED AUGUST 9, 2023
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23
FY 2022-23
AMENDED
FY 2023-24
ADOPTED
FY 2023-24
AMENDED* Variance
City of Montebello
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget
Master Position Control, by Department
Transportation
Director of Transportation 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Assistant Director of Transportation 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Deputy Director 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Transit Administration Manager 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Transit Operations Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Fleet Maintenance Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Maintenance Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0
Transit Dispatch Supervisor 15.0 15.0 15.0 13.0 13.0 0.0 Transit Assistant Manager 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Warehouse Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Fleet Services Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Senior Management Analyst 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Management Analyst 3.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 0.0
Transit Planner 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Account Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Finance Technician 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Bus Operator 120.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 0.0
Heavy Equipment Mechanic 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 0.0
Fleet Service Worker 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 0.0
Body Shop Mechanic 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Building Maintenance Tradeworker II 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Storekeeper 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 0.0
Administrative Assistant 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
204.0 234.0 234.0 233.0 233.0 0.0
Total Full-Time Employees 500.0 543.0 547.0 563.0 580.0 17.0 Total Full-Time Employees Net Elected 493.0 536.0 540.0 556.0 573.0 1 7.0 FY 2021-22
FY 2022-23
ADOPTED
FY 2022-23
AMENDED
FY 2023-24
PROPOSED
FY 2023-24
PROPOSED Variance
Administration 8.0 9.0 11.0 8.0 8.0 0.0
Community Development 21.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0
Finance 21.0 22.0 22.0 24.0 24.0 0.0
Fire 76.0 76.0 76.0 80.0 98.0 18.0
Human Resources* 14.0 16.0 18.0 15.0 15.0 0.0
Parks and Recreation 21.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 0.0
Police 103.0 103.0 103.0 107.0 107.0 0.0
Public Works 25.0 45.0 45.0 46.0 46.0 0.0
Public Affairs-Information Technology* 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 10.0 -1.0 Transit 204.0 234.0 234.0 233.0 233.0 0.0
493.0 536.0 540.0 556.0 573.0 17.0
ITEM # 16
CITY OF MONTEBELLO
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Arlene Salazar, Acting City Manager
BY: Fernando Pelaez, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: AWARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4163 WITH JACOB GREEN & ASSOCIATES (RFP 23-10) TO PREPARE A LOCAL
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
DATE: September 13, 2023
RECOMMENDATION(S):
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Approve Professional Services Agreement No. 4163 with Jacob Green & Associates to prepare a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP); and
2. Authorize the Acting City Manager to execute an Agreement on behalf of the City:
and
3. Amend the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget by increasing appropriations by $85,000 in Account No. 100-85-850-6040.95 (General Fund, Fire, Fire Administration, Other Professional Services); and
4. Take such additional, related, action that may be desirable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
On May 15, 2023, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to find a qualified firm to assist Staff with updating and preparing a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) for adoption by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Through a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process (see "Background/Discussion" section below for detailed information on the selection and evaluation process), Jacob Green and Associates (JGA) was chosen to provide consulting services to assist Staff with updating and preparing a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP).
The total all-inclusive contract amount is a not-to-exceed $84,990, which encompasses all the necessary tasks, deliverables, and expenses associated with successfully completing the Hazard Mitigation Plan. Staff are recommending an increase in appropriations for contract services to enter into an agreement with Jacob Green & Associates by amending the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget by $85,000 in Account No. 100- 85-850-6040.95 (General Fund, Fire, Fire Administration, Other Professional Services).
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
The California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), currently has a grant opportunity that could provide funding for all work associated with the preparation of the LHMP. The City could potentially receive $150,000 in CalOES grant funding to update the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and an additional $50,000 in Prepare California Match funding.
At this point, Staff has not submitted the grant applications, and therefore it is necessary to move forward with amending the FY 2023-24 budget by increasing General Fund appropriations. Should the City be successful in receiving a grant award, all expenses incurred related to updating the LHMP will be recorded against the grant funds, relieving the General Fund of those expenses. Subsequent City Council action to appropriate the grant award funds -- assuming the City is successful in its application -- will be necessary, and Staff will bring appropriate agenda item action at a future date.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On May 15, 2023, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to find a qualified firm to assist City staff with updating and preparing a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) for adoption by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Through a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process (Attachment A), Jacob Green and Associates (JGA) was chosen to provide consulting services to assist staff with updating and preparing a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP). A total of nine (9) proposals were received, and each one was scored by an inter-departmental review group of staff from the Fire and Community Development Departments. Each proposal was scored using six (6) different criteria:
• Project Approach: 25 points
• Professional Experience; 25 points
• Capacity of Complete Project: 15 points
• Budget (cost): 15 points
• References: 10 points
• Local Knowledge/Background: 10 points
The consultants are listed below, ranked in order of proposal score:
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) update will execute a more robust risk assessment and create mitigation strategies for multi-hazards, including the impact of climate change. The City’s Fire Department will coordinate updating of the LHMP and assemble a Local Planning Team (LPT) comprised of representatives from various City departments as well as community stakeholders. All relevant stakeholders will be invited into the planning process, as the LPT is designed to ensure community involvement. This involvement includes ensuring all documents are available in multiple languages (e.g., Spanish, Armenian, etc.) and that translation services are made available at community meetings. The Assistant Fire Chief will serve as Project Manager for this project, lead the LPT, coordinate the Scope of Work (SOW), ensure good communication and manage overall logistics to ensure the project remains on schedule and within budget.
The LHMP is a living document, actively shifting with the community's needs and with new data and events. Having City employees from various City departments on the LPT provides opportunities to choose and implement mitigation activities across all levels of government. The Consultant will engage with City staff and community stakeholders using the four-step process developed by FEMA. This process involves 1) organizing the planning process and resources, 2) assessing risks and capabilities, 3) developing a mitigation strategy, and 4) adopting and implementing the plan.
With assistance from the consultant, the City will submit proof of adoption to FEMA for final approval of the City of Montebello LHMP Update. The updated plan will be incorporated into the Safety Element of the City’s General Plan in compliance with AB 2140. With the Plan Update, Montebello will make its community safer by identifying resources and strategies for risk reduction and guiding mitigation activity coordination throughout the City, focusing on vulnerable, under-served community members to create equitable outcomes.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends the City Council authorize the Acting City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Jacob Green & Associates for consulting services to assist with updating and preparing a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) for adoption by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and Amend the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget by increasing appropriations by $85,000 in Account No. 100-85-850- 6040.95 (Genera Fund, Fire, Fire Administration, Other Professional Services). Staff are pursuing grant opportunities from CalOES that would offset any General Fund expenditures. Should the City be successful in the grant award process, Staff will return with City Council action to appropriate the grant funds.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. ATTACHMENT A - Agr No. 4163 - Jacob Green and Associates (DRAFT)
NEXT STEPS:
N/A
ATTACHMENT A
Appendix B – Sample Professional Services Agreement
CITY OF MONTEBELLO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
WITH JACOB GREEN AND ASSOCIATES
THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is
made and entered into on September 13, 2023 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF MONTEBELLO, a California municipal corporation (the “CITY”) and Jacob Green and Associates (the “CONSULTANT”). The CITY and the CONSULTANT are sometimes referred to herein individual as the “Party,” and jointly as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to retain a qualified professional consultant to provide __________________________ services in the CITY; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that it is fully qualified to perform such services by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and employees.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of performan ce by the Parti es of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS AND OTHER CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS
a. The above-referenced Recitals constitute a material part hereof and shall hereby be incorporated by reference. Moreover, this Agreement consists of the following documents, in order of precedence, all of which are incorporated herein and made part of this Agreement, as though fully set forth herein:
1. This Agreement and its Exhibits, including any and all addenda or supplemental agreements.
2. RFP No. ____
3. Proposal referenced and Best Final Offer received by the successful proposer.
4. All other documents, including but not limited to all applicable bonds, insurance certificates, permits, notices, schedules, forms, certifications, and affidavits.
b. These documents shall be collectively referred to herein as the “Contract Documents.” In the event of a conflict among the Contract Documents, the order of precedence list above shall apply.
SECTION 2. SERVICES / COMPENSATION.
All terms, conditions, requirements, and provisions of the Request for Proposals for consulting services to assist staff with updating and preparing a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan in the City of Montebello
a.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
(insert date issued ) (“Request for Proposals”), as such is set forth fully in Exhibit “A” hereto, are hereby incorporated fully herein by this reference and shall be binding on the Parties. To the extent of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and that set forth in any exhibits or attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.
b. The CONSULTANT shall provide to the CITY all labor, equipment, materials and incidental necessary to provide _________________________ services as set forth fully in the Request for Proposals, as such is set forth fully in Exhibit “A ” hereto and incorporated fully herein by this reference (hereinafter “Professional Services”).
c. The CONSULTANT shall be compensated for performance of the Professional Services as set forth in the Schedule of Compensation attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated fully herein by this reference (“Compensation”). The CONSULTANT shall provide an itemized billing statement to the CITY each month for Professional Services performed. The CONSULTANT shall no incur fees or costs which exceed the Compensation without the prior written consent of the CITY.
SECTION 3. TERM.
a. This Agreement shall commence upon issuance of a written “No tice to Proceed” (as further defined below) by the CITY and shall expire X years from the Effective Date, unless terminated earlier as hereinafter provided. This Agreement may be extended for up to X year extensions upon such terms and conditions mutually agreed upon by the Parties in writing.
b. Notice to Proceed. Any work or service contemplated under this Agreement shall not commence until the CITY has issued a written Notice to Proceed issued by CITY’s applicable, department head.
SECTION 4. PERFORMANCE.
a. The CONSULTANT shall at all times, faithfully, competently, and to the best of its ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. b. The CONSULTANT shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by companies engaged in providing similar services, as are required of Consultant hereunder, in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
c. The CONSULTANT shall be knowledgeable of and subject to all CITY ordinances, rules and regulations, standard operating procedures, and the supervisory chain of command.
d. The CONSULTANT shall have the right to retain, subject to the CITY's approval, additional individuals, consultants or subconsultants to assist in the completion of services as herein defined. Compensation for additional individuals, consultants or subconsultants shall be the sole and exclusive responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
e. The CONSULTANT shall retain all original reports, field and office
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
notes, correspondence, calculations, maps, and other documents specifically related to the services provided by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement, other than documents which are exempt from disclosure pursuant to the attorney-client privilege or any other law. Said documents shall be made available for inspection by the CITY upon request.
SECTION 5. WORK PRODUCT.
a. The CONSULTANT hereby agrees that all work product produced pursuant to this Agreement, and provided to the CITY during and upon completion of this Agreement, shall be the property of the CITY, and ownership of said work product shall be retained by the CITY. The CONSULTANT may take and retain copies of such written products as desired, but no such written products shall be the subject of a copyright application by the CONSULTANT.
b. All data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by the CONSULTANT or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by the CONSULTANT without prior written consent by the CITY. The CITY shall grant such consent if disclosure is legally required. All such written products shall be returned to the CITY upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement.
The CONSULTANT agrees that the covenants contained in this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
SECTION 6. EXTRA SERVICES.
No extra services over and above the Compensation shall be rendered by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement unless such extra services first shall have been duly authorized in writing by the CITY’s City Manager (the “City Manager”).
SECTION 7. CITY SUPERVISION.
The City Manager shall have the right of general supervision of all work performed by the CONSULTANT and shall be the CITY’s agent with respect to obtaining the CONSULTANT’s compliance hereunder. No payment for services rendered under this Agreement shall be made without the prior approval of the City Manager.
SECTION 8. TERMINATION.
In the event that either Party hereto fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement at the time and in the manner required, the non-defaulting party shall give the defaulting party written notice of the default, the nature of the default, and of the steps necessary to cure the default.
a. Termination for Cause. In the event that any of the provisions of the Agreement are violated by either party, the non-defaulting Party may terminate the Agreement by serving written notice upon the other Party, listing the violation(s) and its intent to terminate such Agreement unless within ten (10) days after the serving of such notice, such violation shall cease or be rectified, the contract shall upon the expiration of an additional thirty (30) days cease and terminate. Violations by the CONSULTANT which cannot be
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
corrected within ten (10) days, said contract shall at the option of the CITY cease and terminate upon the giving of like notice. In the event of any such termination for default by the CONSULTANT, the CITY may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise for the account and at the expense of the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT and his sureties shall be liable to the CITY for any excess cost occasioned in the event of any such termination. This change shall not be construed to prevent the termination, for other causes authorized by law or other provisions of this contract. In the event of a termination for cause, the CONSULTANT shall only be entitled to the Compensation for those Professional Services satisfactory performed on or before the effective date of termination.
b. Termination for Convenience. The CITY shall have the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, to terminate this Agreement in whole, or in part, by giving ten (30) business days’ written notice to the CONSULTANT. Upon the termination of this Agreement as provided herein, the CITY shall provide to the CONSULTANT the part of Compensation which would otherwise be payable to the CONSULTANT for services the CONSULTANT had completed as of the date of termination, less the amount of all previous payment with respect to the Compensation. Further, upon such a termination for convenience by the CITY, the Parties agree that the CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed for any “non -refundable” costs that the CONSULTANT has incurred for its services under this Agreement, provided that: (1) such “non - refundable” costs were incurred by the CONSULTANT prior to the date of termination, and (2) that the CONSULTANT provides the CITY with adequate proof that the CONSULTANT incurred the costs, and is unable to be seek a refund for such costs. Such “non-refundable” costs may include, but are not limited to, travel reservations incurred by the CONSULTANT for its performance of services under this Agreement. The CONSULTANT agrees to cease all work under this Agreement on or before the effective date of any notice of termination.
SECTION 9. EMPLOYMENT OF CITY EMPLOYEES.
No regular employee of the CITY shall be employed by the CONSULTANT during the term of this Agreement.
SECTION 10. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES.
No official or employee of the CITY shall be personally liable to the CONSULTANT in the event of any default or breach by the CITY, or for any amount which may become due to the CONSULTANT.
SECTION 11. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT.
a. The CONSULTANT is and shall, at all times, remain as to the CITY a wholly independent consultant. Neither the CITY nor any of its elected officials, officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of the CONSULTANT except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. The
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
CONSULTANT shall not at any time or in any manner represent that he or she is in any manner an elected official, officer, employee, or agent of the CITY. No employee benefits shall be available to the CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in this Agreement, the CITY shall not pay salary, wages, or other compensation to the CONSULTANT for performance hereunder for the CITY, the CITY shall not be liable for compensation to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT’s employees or the CONSULTANT’s subconsultants for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
b. The parties further acknowledge and agree that nothing in this Agreement shall create or be construed to create a partnership, joint venture, employment relationship or any other relationship except as set forth in this Agreement.
c. The CITY shall not deduct from the Compensation paid to the CONSULTANT any sums required for Social Security, withholding taxes, FICA, state disability insurance or any other federal, state or local tax or charge which may or may not be in effect or hereinafter enacted or required as a charge or withholding on the compensation paid to the CONSULTANT.
The CITY shall have no responsibility to provide the CONSULTANT, its employees or subconsultants with workers’ compensation insurance or any other insurance.
SECTION 12. CalPERS ANNUITANTS AND ELIGIBILITY INDEMNITY. a. If the CONSULTANT is a California Pub lic Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) annuitant, the CONSULTANT must provide the City with written notification of such fact a minimum of 14 calendar days prior to commencement of services under this Agreement.
Failure to provide such notification may result in termination of the Agreement, and any penalties or other costs relating thereto shall be borne by the CONSULTANT. If this Agreement remains in place, the CONSULTANT shall execute any amendment(s) to this Agreement requested by the City in order to comply with all laws and regulations applicable to CalPERS annuitants.
b. In the event that the CONSULTANT or any employee, agent, or subconsultant of the CONSULTANT providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligible for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the CITY for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for CalPERS benefits on behalf of the CONSULTANT or its employees, agents, or
subconsultants, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of the CITY.
c. Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, the CONSULTANT and
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
any of its employees, agents, and subconsultants providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by the CITY, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of the CITY and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by the CITY for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.
SECTION 13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES.
The CONSULTANT shall at all times observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations of the federal, state, and local governments including, but not limited to the Montebello Municipal Code. The CITY, and its appointed or elected officers, employees, or agents, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the CONSULTANT to comply with this section.
SECTION 14. INDEMNIFICATION.
The CONSULTANT agrees to, and shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the CITY, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, defense costs, civil, penalties, expenses, causes of action, and judgments at law or in equity, or liability of any kind or nature which the CITY, its elected and appointed boards, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injuries or deaths of persons, or damage to property arising out of the CONSULTANT’s negligent or wrongful act, or omission under the terms of this Agreement, except only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the CITY.
SECTION 15. INSURANCE COVERAGE.
a. During the term of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect insurance against claims for death or injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with CONSULTANT’s performance of this Agreement. Such insurance shall be of the types and in the amounts as set forth below:
Commercial General Liability (CGL) : Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis for bodily injur y and property damage, including products-completed operations, personal injury, and advertising injury, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, the limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
Automobile Liability Insurance: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if CONSULTANT has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non-owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the laws of the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the CONSULTANT’S profession, with limit no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.
b. If the CONSULTANT maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the CONSULTANT.
c. The CONTACTOR shall require each of its subconsultants, if any, to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Agreement. d. The policy or policies required by this Agreement shall be issued by an insurer admitted in the State of California and with a current rating of at least A:VII in the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide.
e. Each insurance policy required above shall state that coverage shall not be canceled, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice (ten [10] days for non-payment) has been given to the CITY. The CONSULTANT agrees that if it does not keep the aforesaid insurance in full force and effect the CITY may either (i) immediately terminate this Agreement for Cause; or (ii) take out the necessary insurance and pay, at the CONSULTANT’s expense, the premium thereon. f. Evidence of Insurance prior to commencement . The Contractor shall provide to the CITY Certificate(s) of Insurance evidencing such coverage together with copies of the required policy endorsements no later than five (5) business days prior to commencement of service and at least fifteen (15) business days prior to the expiration of any policy. Unreasonable failure to provide such evidence may be cause for termination of the Agreement as provided herein or delay the services’ commencement date. The evidence of insurance shall be U.S. mail or email to:
City of Montebello
Attn: Risk Manager
1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, CA 90640
Email: [insert designated email]
Coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled, reduced in coverage or in limits, non-renewed, or materially changed for any reason, without thirty (30) days prior written notice thereof given by the insurer to the CITY by U.S. mail, or by personal delivery, except for nonpayment of premiums, in which case ten (10) days prior notice shall be provided.
g. Evidence of Insurance during the entire term of the Agreement . At all times during the term of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall maintain on file with the CITY’s Risk Manager a certificate or certificates of insurance showing that the aforesaid policies are in effect in the required amounts and naming the CITY as an additional insured. The CONSULTANT shall, prior to commencement of work under this Agreement, file with the CITY’s Risk Manager such certificate(s). h. The CONSULTANT shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Such proof will be furnished at least two (2) weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages. i. The general liability and automobile policies of insurance required by this Agreement shall contain an endorsement naming the CITY, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds. All of the policies required under this Agreement shall contain an endorsement providing that the policies cannot be canceled or reduced except on thirty days’ prior written notice to the CITY. The CONSULTANT agrees to require its insurer to modify the certificates of insurance to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, and to delete the word “endeavor” with regard to any notice provisions.
j. The insurance provided by the CONSULTANT shall be primary to any coverage available to the CITY. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the CITY, its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers, shall be in excess of CONSULTANT’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. k. All insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement shall not prohibit the CONSULTANT, and CONSULTANT’s employees, agents or subconsultants, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. The CONSULTANT hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the CITY. l. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the CITY. At the option of the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to the CITY, or the CONSULTANT shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and expenses.
m. Procurement of insurance by the CONSULTANT shall not be construed as a limitation of the CONSULTANT'S liability or as full performance of CONSULTANT’s duties to indemnify, hold harmless and defend under the indemnity covenants of this Agreement.
SECTION 16. SUBCONTRACT, ASSIGNMENT OR DELEGATION.
The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract, delegate, or assign its duties or rights hereunder, either in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the CITY.
Any proposed subcontract, delegation, or assignment shall provide a description of the services to be covered, identification of the proposed sub-consultant, delegee, or assignee, and an explanation of why and how the same was selected, including the degree of competition involved.
Any subcontract, delegation or assignment shall be made in the name of the CONSULTANT and shall not bind or purport to bind the CITY and shall not release the CONSULTANT from any obligations under this Agreement including, but not limited to, the duty to properly supervise and coordinate the work of employees, assignees, delegees or sub-consultants. No such subcontract, delegation or assignment shall result in any increase in the amount of total compensation payable to the CONSULTANT under the Agreement.
SECTION 17. NO WAIVER.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
Waiver by any party hereto of any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant hereof.
SECTION 18. DISPUTE RESOLUTION; GOVERNING LAW.
Disputes regarding the interpretation or application of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall, to the extent reasonably feasible, be resolved through good faith negotiations between the Parties. If any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce this Agreement or because of alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees, expert fees, costs and necessary disbursements incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to such other relief as may be sought and awarded. The venue for any litigation shall be County of Los Angeles, California. The Parties agree that the covenants contained in this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
SECTION 19. ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS.
If litigation is reasonably required to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.
SECTION 20. WARRANTIES.
Each of the parties represents and warrants to one another as follows:
a. It has received independent legal advice from its attorneys with respect to the advisability of entering into and executing this Agreement;
b. In executing this Agreement, it has carefully read this Agreement, knows the contents thereof, and has relied solely on the statements expressly set forth herein and has placed no reliance whatsoever on any statement, representation, or promise of any other party, or any other person or entity, not expressly set forth herein, nor upon the failure of any other party or any other person or entity to make any statement, representation or disclosure of any matter whatsoever; and
c. It is agreed that each party has the full right and authority to enter into this Agreement, and that the person executing this Agreement on behalf of either party has the full right and authority to fully commit and bind such party to the provisions of this Agreement.
SECTION 21. MISCELLANEOUS.
a. The descriptive paragraph headings of this Agreement are included for purposes of convenience only and shall not control or affect the construction of interpretation of any of its provisions.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
b. Whenever the context hereof shall so require, the singular shall include the plural, the male gender shall include the female gender, and the neuter and vice versa.
c. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provisions had never been contained herein. d. The representations and warranties made by the parties to this Agreement shall survive the consummation of the transaction herein described. e. This Agreement may be signed in any one or more counterparts all of which taken together shall be but one and the same Agreement. Any signed copy of this Agreement or of any other document or agreement referred to herein, or copy or counterpart thereof, delivered by facsimile transmission, shall for all purposes be treated as if it were delivered containing an original manual signature of the party whose signature appears in the facsimile and shall be binding upon such party in the same manner as though an originally signed copy had been delivered.
f. Each of the parties acknowledges that it has been represented by independent counsel of its own choosing, or if it has not been so represented, it has been admonished to obtain independent counsel and has freely and voluntarily waived and relinquished the right to counsel.
Each party who has not obtained independent counsel acknowledges that the failure to have independent legal counsel will not excuse such party’s failure to perform under this Agreement or any agreement referred to in this Agreement.
SECTION 22. NOTICE.
All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement shall be given in writing and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered via e- mail (an “Electronic Notice” as further defined below), personally or on the second (2nd) business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, addressed as hereinafter provided. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals hereunder shall be given to the following addresses or such other addresses as the Parties may designate by written notice:
If to CITY: City of Montebello
Attn: René Bobadilla, City Manager
1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, CA 90640
(323) 887-1200
Email: [ENTER EMAIL ADDRESS]
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
With a copy to:
If to Consultant:
City of Montebello – Fire Department
Attn: Fernando Pelaez, Fire Chief
1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, CA 90640
(323) 558 -1625 ext.
Email: [email protected]
Jacob Green and Associates
Attn: ___________________
Address
City, CA #####
(###) ###-####
Email
An electronic communication (“ Electronic Notice”) shall be deemed written notice for purposes of this section if sent to the electronic mail address specified above.
Electronic Notice shall be deemed received at the time the party sending Electronic Notice receives verification of receipt by the receiving party. Any party receiving Electronic Notice may request and shall be entitled to receive the notice on paper, in a nonelectronic form.
SECTION 23. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER.
In the performance of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee, sub-consultant, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, mental condition or sexual orientation. The CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that sub- consultant and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition or sexual orientation.
SECTION 24. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
The CONSULTANT covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the services to be performed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services hereunder. The CONSULTANT further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, the CONSULTANT shall avoid the appearance of having any interest that would conflict in any manner with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement.
The CONSULTANT covenants not to give or receive any compensation, monetary or otherwise, to or from the ultimate vendor(s) of services to the CITY as a result of the performance of this Agreement, or the services that may be procured by the CITY as a result of the recommendations made by the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
SECTION 25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the CITY and the CONSULTANT. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations or representations not expressly set forth herein are of no force or effect. Subsequent modifications to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and signed by each party. If any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, th e remaining provisions of this Agreement shall be valid and binding. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 4136
IN WITNESS WHEREO F, the parti es, through their respectiv e authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. (“CITY”)
CITY OF MONTEBELLO
(“CONSULTANT”)
JACOB GREEN AND ASSOCIATES
Arlene Salazar, Acting City Manager Full Name, Title
ATTEST:
Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A – Request for Proposals for Services and
Contractor’s Proposal
Exhibit B – Schedule of Compensation
Exhibit C – Live Scan Fingerprinting Requirement
EXHIBIT “A”
Request for Proposals for Services and Contractor’s Proposal
EXHIBIT “B”
Schedule of Compensation
EXHIBIT “C”
Live Scan Fingerprinting Requirements
Prior to commencing services, the CONSULTANT may be required to successfully pass a Department of Justice fingerprinting background check (“Live Scan”) performed by a certified fingerprinting service provider or at the City of Montebello Police Department. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for obtaining the Live Scan for its staff and shall bear the cost thereof. The agency completing the fingerprints must provide the City of Montebello Human Resources with the background check results and subsequent records for review. The CONSULTANT must obtain a “Temporary Consultant’s Badge” issued by the City of Montebello Human Resources prior to performing work.
ITEM # 17
CITY OF MONTEBELLO
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Arlene Salazar, Acting City Manager
BY: Paul Espinosa, Police Chief
SUBJECT: APPROVE ISSUING REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) 24 – 5 FOR PUBLIC
SAFETY VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEM UPGRADES
DATE: September 13, 2023
RECOMMENDATION(S):
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Authorize issuing a Request for Proposals No. 24-5 (RFP) for Public Safety Video Camera Systems Upgrades; and
2. Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Issuing an RFP does not have a direct cost associated at this time. Once the selection has been complete, staff will return to request City Council approval of a professional services agreement per the Montebello Municipal Code Chapter 3.20 - Purchasing System guidelines. If necessary, any budget amendments will be made depending on the total cost of the services procured through the RFP process.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Through issuance of Request for Proposals 24-5 (Attachment A), the City will choose a vendor to provide the necessary items and services to upgrade/replace the existing video security system. Currently, the City has a very antiquated video security system installed at various buildings and facilities. The system was initially installed as a method to enhance safety for visitors and employees by acting as a crime deterrent, providing situational awareness for security personnel and law enforcement responding to incidents, and to provide evidentiary video if an incident occurs.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
The current video camera system lacks modern features such as high-resolution video quality, remote monitoring, advanced analytics, and has inadequate storage of data and information, which are crucial for effective surveillance and incident prevention. Moreover, there are certain Federal law enforcement requirements which the camera system upgrade will meet, ensuring the City is complying with Federal regulations.
In addition to age, the current solution is comprised of multiple disjoined systems at various locations and facilities. The hardware and software vary in brand, technology, capacity, and capability. The City wishes to create a unified, centralized system that is capable of future expansion. Furthermore, the City is seeking on-going support services to ensure staff is trained in how to properly operate the system and for maintenance and repair services.
The project will be broken into several phases, which will eventually install/upgrade a total of fifty-three (53) cameras in locations inside and outside of the Police Department, City Hall and adjacent parking lots. Required network equipment will be installed, as well as required software and training are required components of the project. These video camera upgrades are essential to enhance public safety, improve law enforcement capabilities, and ensure the security of the community.
Additional details about the Scope of Work, project scope and related project details are included in the RFP document attached to this agenda report (Attachment A). It is requested that the City Council authorize issuing an RFP for Public Safety Video Camera Systems Upgrades for the Police Department (RFP 24 - 5).
ENVIRONMENTAL:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
N/A
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the issuance of an RFP for Public Safety Video Camera Systems Upgrade (RFP 24-5).
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. ATTACHMENT A - RFP 24-5 - City Video Camera System Upgrade (Draft)
NEXT STEPS:
N/A
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF MONTEBELLO
Request for Proposals
RFP No. 24 – 5
Video Camera System Upgrade Project
Release Date: Friday, September 15, 2023
Mandatory Site Walk: Tuesday, October 3, 2023,
at 10 a.m. PST
Due Date: Thursday, October 26, 2023, at 11 a.m. PST
2
3 TO PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS
The City of Montebello (“City”) invites proposal submissions under this Request for Proposals (“RFP”). The City will evaluate responses to this solicitation to determine qualifications. Submissions must adhere to the format and content described. Only proposals that adhere to the requirements will be evaluated. The information set forth is the minimum required to qualify for consideration. The successful Proposer will be required to enter into a Professional Services Agreement based on the specifications outlined in this RFP.
DATE OF SOLICITATION
August 25, 2023
PROJECT
Video Camera System Upgrade Project
PROPOSAL OWNER
City of Montebello – Department of Finance & Information Technology 1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, CA 90640
Attn: Michael Solorza, Director of Finance & Information Technology Contact Phone: (323) 887-1200
Contact E-Mail: [email protected]
PROPOSAL CONTACT
City of Montebello – Department of Finance & Information Technology 1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, CA 90640
Attn: Micah Herd Senior Management Analyst
Contact Phone: (323) 887- 1200
Contact E-Mail: [email protected]
Any questions about this RFP should be submitted via the City's PlanetBids Portal by Wednesday, September 27, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. PST. Prospective vendors must register their business with PlanetBids before being able to view or submit a response.
To access the City's PlanetBids Portal, please go to:
https://www.montebelloca.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=58756&pageId=84839
4 Table of Contents Page
1.0 Notice Inviting Proposals 5
2.0 Introduction/About the City of Montebello 6
3.0 Timeline 6
4.0 Purpose 6
5.0 Scope of Work 7
6.0 Mandatory Site Visit 11
7.0 Proposal Submittal 12
8.0 Evaluation of Proposal 12
9.0 Proposal Protests 12
10.0 Execution of Agreement 14
11.0 Insurance 14
12.0 Use of Federal Funds 16
13.0 Non-Commitment of City 17
14.0 Labor Requirements 17
15.0 Records 18
16.0 Subcontractors 18
17.0 Modifications/Changes 18
18.0 Disclosure of Information 18
19.0 Ex-Parte Communications 19
20.0 City of Montebello Rights 19
Appendix A – Proposal Content and Format
Appendix B – Sample Professional Services Agreement
Appendix C – Non-Disclosure Agreement1
Appendix D – Site Plans – City Hall & Police Department2 1 To be returned at the Site Walk.
2 Site Plans will be provided to vendors who attend the mandatory site walk on Tuesday, September 19, 2023
5 1.0 Notice Inviting Proposals
The City of Montebello seeks proposals from qualified vendors to assist with upgrading the video camera system following the specifications, terms, and conditions identified in this RFP. Prospective respondents are advised to carefully read information related to this opportunity before submitting a response.
To view the complete RFP package, please visit:
https://www.montebelloca.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=58756&pageId=84839 Prospective vendors must register with PlanetBids before being able to view or submit a response.
Vendors must also attend a mandatory site visit on Tuesday, October 3, 2023, at 10 a.m. PST. The site visit will be held at Montebello City Hall, 1600 West Beverly Boulevard, Montebello, CA 90640. Site visit attendees must check in with City personnel in the lobby of City Hall and sign-in. Failure to attend the site visit and sign-in may result in the vendor’s response to the RFP being rejected.
Questions must be submitted by Wednesday, October 11, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. PST. *****QUESTIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED VIA PLANETBIDS*****
Proposals must be submitted via PlanetBids by Thursday, October 26, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. PST.
Responses to this request for proposals will be evaluated to determine the vendor that is the most qualified and responsive to the requirements. Responses must adhere to the format and content described in the RFP.
2.0 Introduction
6 The City of Montebello invites prospective vendors to submit a proposal to provide the necessary items and services to upgrade/replace the existing video security system.
Currently, the City has a very antiquated video security system installed at various buildings and facilities. The system was initially installed as a method to enhance safety for visitors and employees by acting as a crime deterrent, providing situational awareness for security personnel and law enforcement responding to incidents, and to provide evidentiary video if an incident occurs.
In addition to age, the current solution is comprised of multiple disjoined systems at various locations and facilities. The hardware and software vary in brand, technology, capacity, and capability. The City wishes to create a unified, centralized system that is capable of future expansion. Furthermore, the City is seeking on-going support services to ensure staff is trained how to property operate the system and for maintenance and repair services.
About the City of Montebello
Montebello ("beautiful mountain" in Spanish and Italian) is a city in the County of Los Angeles. Founded in 1899 and incorporated in 1920, the City is an 8.37 square mile General Law City located east of Downtown Los Angeles. Currently, the City has a population of approximately 63,000 residents. It hosts a mix of various industries that represent the business diversity of the County of Los Angeles. It is a full-service City that provides a long list of services, employing approximately 500 full-time and part-time employees in public safety, transit, and non-safety functions.
3.0 Timeline
•Release RFP Friday, September 15, 2023
•Mandatory Site Visit Tuesday, October 3, 2023, 10 a.m. PST •Online Q&A Deadline Wednesday, October 11, 2023,11 a.m. PST •Deadline to Submit Responses Thursday, October 26, 2023, at 11 a.m. PST •City Review of Submissions Late October/Early November 2023 •Interviews TBD (If Necessary)
•Notifications Sent to Vendors Early/Mid-November 2023
•Award Late November/Early December 2023
4.0 Purpose
The purpose of this solicitation is to identify a qualified vendor to assist the City with updating/replacing the City’s existing video security system in order to increase reliability. At the same time, the City is seeking to procure a system that can be easily expanded in the future. At the completion of the initial phases of this project, all cameras and network equipment, should be integrated and manageable from a single video monitoring software and viewable at designated user stations.
7 The City is seeking to establish an agreement with a minimum term of two (2) years with up to three (3), one (1) year extension options for a total of up to five (5) years. This requirement may change during the process of finalizing the agreement with the selected vendor.
5.0 Scope of Work/Services
City of Montebello is requesting proposals from qualified vendors capable of providing interior and exterior video cameras, network hardware, video monitoring software, installation services, software support, maintenance and repair services, and related items and services. The requested solution will be used to replace the City’s existing video security system.
The current, primary video system is located at the Police Department. It consists of approximately twenty-seven (27) interior and exterior cameras. The camera system operates using a video monitoring systems manufactured by HIKVision. Many of the cameras have a resolution of 960x480, 1792 bitrate, and encoding is H.264. Retention is thirty (30) to ninety (90) days. Other buildings and facilities in the City have cameras that operate independently of the Police Department’s solution. These solutions range from video solutions made for consumer/home use to a solution that uses Genetec software.
The City is seeking to replace the existing system with a significantly improved solution with high-definition video, increased storage capacity, and improved features. In addition, the City would like to integrate the existing camera solutions (if possible) into a single, unified solution.
In general, the City is looking for a turn-key solution. The vendor will be responsible for any camera hardware, any necessary cable runs, as well as installation of networking equipment at City facilities. The vendor will also be responsible for coordinating with the City’s Information Technology Division, as needed, for any configuration necessary for integration.
The City envisions this project being completed through a series of phases. This approach is being taken to ensure the project team can efficiently and effectively manage tasks. Below is a list of each of areas/tasks associated with the proposed phases. The City has also made recommendations for the number of cameras to be installed in each of the impacted areas, but proposers are encouraged to make recommendations regarding the quantity and type of cameras depending on the needs.
The following is a list of the phases and the number of cameras required for each:
Phase 1 – Installation of Network Equipment
During Phase 1, the vendor is expected to install network equipment in the designated area(s) (2 nd Floor Police Department IDF Room and/or City Hall
8 Basement). When creating plans for network equipment, vendors should keep in mind the potential for expansion to new areas within the City and integration with existing cameras.
Phase 2 – Police Department Jail & Evidence Rooms (25 Cameras) The Police Department requires a total of fourteen (14) cameras in the jail. At least one (1) camera should be placed in each jail cell and provide an overview of the entire cell. The remaining cameras will be installed at entry/exit points, hallways, and the sallyport area. Six (6) cameras are needed in the evidence rooms and hallways. An additional five (5) cameras will be installed at public entry/exit points and publicly accessible areas of the police station on the first and third floors.
Phase 3 – Police Department Building Exterior & Parking Lot (10 Cameras) For Phase 3, the City requires a minimum of ten (10) cameras. Six (6) cameras should be used for the exterior of the Police Department building. The remaining four (4) cameras should be used for Department’s parking lot with two (2) cameras, covering vehicle entry/exit, one (1) camera covering pedestrian entry/exit, and the remaining camera providing an overview of the entire area.
The Police Department’s parking lot secured by a gate and separate from the City Hall parking lot.
Phase 4 – City Hall Lobby & Exterior (8 Cameras)
For the City Hall Lobby and Exterior, the City is seeking a total of eight (8) cameras. Two (2) cameras will be placed in the lobby area and the remaining cameras will be placed around the perimeter of the exterior.
Phase 5 – City Hall Parking Lot (10 Cameras)
The vendor will be responsible for installing a minimum of ten (10) cameras in the City Hall Parking Lot. Cameras should be installed in a manner to capture pedestrian and vehicle traffic in the parking lot, as well provide a clear view of the entry/exit points onto the lot from the surrounding streets.
Upon completion of each phase and system acceptance by the City’s project team, the selected vendor will be required to provide documentation which inventories of all items/equipment installed, by the make, model, serial number, description, and location of the items/equipment. In addition, the documentation should include a diagram which details the cameras field of view.
As previously mentioned, the City is seeking a video security system that can be expanded in the future. Beyond the initial phases mentioned above, the City will engage with the selected vendor for the procurement of necessary items and services if it is within the term of the agreement.
9 Advanced Camera Features
To ensure the solution is used in an effective and efficient manner, the City is seeking to features to some of the cameras to enhance performance. These features, include but are not limited to:
•Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ)
•Two-way Audio
•High-Definition
•Night Vision/Low-light
•Motion/Trigger Activation
Vendor proposals should make recommendations regarding the use of these features and others if determined to improve performance. Recommendations should identify which cameras should include these features.
Video Retention
Except for cameras installed in the City’s Evidence Rooms and Jail Facility, all cameras must have a retention period of thirty (30) days. Cameras installed in Evidence Rooms and Jail Facility must have a retention period of 366 days. The retention period is subject to change at any time at the request of the City.
Video Monitoring Stations
As part of the initial implementation plan, the City expects to receive a total of six (6) video viewing stations. The viewing stations will be installed at the Watch Commander’s Office/Desk (Police Department), Jail Facility (Police Department), Dispatch Center (Police Department), Information Technology Office (City Hall), and two (2) additional locations that will be determined later.
Vendors are only expected to provide and install the software required for the video monitoring. The City will reserve the option to procure the necessary hardware for installation of the monitoring software at its own discretion. Upon request, the selected vendors will need to provide minimum hardware/software requirements for operating the video monitoring software.
Staff Training
The vendor selected is expected to conduct system administrator and user training sessions for the City. At least three (3) training sessions are conducted for the groups (1 – System Administrator Training, 2 – User Trainings). Furthermore, the vendor will also be required to provide all reference manuals, booklets, and/or other materials required for training. Vendors are requested to indicate their availability to conduct training and provide the cost in their proposal.
10 Training sessions can be facilitated remotely (e.g. Zoom, Microsoft Teams) or in-person.
Warranty Requirement
Unless otherwise specified, the selected vendor is expected to unconditionally guarantee the materials and workmanship on all products and equipment furnished by it FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR from the date of system acceptance by the City. If within the guarantee period, any defects or signs of deterioration are noted which, in the opinion of the City, are due to faulty design and installation, workmanship, or materials, the City shall notify the vendor. At the vendor's expense, the vendor shall repair or adjust the equipment or parts to correct the condition or replace the part or entire unit to the complete satisfaction of the City.
Maintenance and Repair Services
After the warranty period ends, the City will seek on-going support, maintenance, and repairs services to continue. The vendors should include the cost of extended maintenance and repair services after the warranty period ends for up to two (2) years.
Vendor Qualifications
The selected vendor must have the following minimum qualifications:
A.The vendor shall have full time personnel that have attended manufacturer training and obtained certification in:
i.Genetec Security Center – Synergis Technical Certification (or similar certification related to the proposed solution).
ii.Genetec Security Center – Omnicast Technical Certification (or similar certification related to the proposed solution).
B.The vendor shall be a Genetec certified partner (or similar certification related to the proposed solution)
C.The vendor shall submit confirmation from Genetec (or similar certification related to the proposed solution).
D.Demonstrate their experience facilitating services for a project of similar size and scale (or similar certification related to the proposed solution).
Background Check
Vendor working on-site and in specific remote capacities, will be required to undergo a background check conducted by the City.
11 Work Schedule
All work associated with the system build/implementation phases must be completed during normal operating hours, Monday – Thursday, 7:00am – 5:00pm, excluding City observed holidays. The vendor’s designated project manager is expected to inform the City’s representative(s) where and when work will be completed to ensure the accessibility and to minimize disruption of normal City business. Any work that is necessary to conduct outside of normal business hours must be coordinated and approved by the City’s project management team.
6.0 Mandatory Site Visit
All prospective proposers must attend the scheduled site visit to the Montebello Police Department and Montebello City Hall. The City reserves the right to disqualify proposal submission from any proposer who fails to attend the site visit. The site visit will begin at the following date, time, and location:
Site Visit Date/Time
Tuesday, October 3, 2023, at 10 a.m. PST
Meeting Location
Montebello City Hall
1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, CA 90640
Upon arrival, proposers should park their vehicles in the areas designated “visitor parking” and check-in with City Hall personnel in the lobby. They will then be directed to the meeting area where they will be met by the City’s project team and escorted to the project areas. The City reserves the right to allow a grace period up to ten (10) minutes for late arrivals. The site visit is expected to take to one (1) to two (2) hours.
Prior to the site walk, vendor representatives will be required to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement. A copy of the agreement has been attached as Appendix C.
Upon completion of the site visit, the City will post sign-in sheet as Addendum. The City reserves the right to reject any proposals submitted by vendors who did not attend the site walk and sign-in.
Vendors attending the site visit will be emailed copies of site plans associated with this project. Once issued, these site plans will be referred to as Appendix D.
7.0 Proposal submittal
Please review Appendix A - Proposal Format and Content, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, for specific details regarding the information that needs to be included in your submission. Failure to provide all requested information
12 may be considered “non-responsive” and rejected.
Responses to this RFP must be submitted electronically via the City’s PlanetBids Portal by the deadline. Any responses transmitted and/or time-stamped after the deadline will not be accepted. Consultants planning to submit responses to this request are highly encouraged to submit all documentation before the deadline to avoid technical difficulties/errors.
8.0 Evaluation Criteria
The City will establish an evaluation committee to review and rate each proposal. The proposal evaluation process will be conducted using a multi-step method which will include the following steps:
A.Preliminary Proposal Review - The evaluation committee will review each submission to ensure adherence to the minimum/proposal format requirements.
B.Proposal Evaluation - In the second part of this process, the evaluation committee will review and rate proposals based on the following:
i. Qualifications as they relate to this project (50%)
a. Thoroughness and understanding of the tasks to be completed b. Background and experience
c. Knowledge of the City of Montebello
d. Experience of personnel assigned to the work
e. Communication Skills
ii. Reputation for integrity and competence (30%)
a. Positive Reference Checks
b. Work Samples
iii. Proposed fees for services (20%)
9.0 Protest Procedures
Proposal Protest Procedures (Before Proposal Opening)
A protest filed before the proposal opening must be filed in writing no later than ten (10) working days before opening. The most common types of protest that might be filed before a proposal opening include those based upon restrictive specifications or alleged improprieties in any solicitation that is apparent before the scheduled proposal opening.
When a protest is filed before a scheduled proposal opening, certain steps must be followed:
13 A. The protest must be submitted in writing within the specified time frame (no later than ten (10) working days prior to a proposal opening). All protests must be filed with the Director of Finance for determination. Protest must be submitted to the Director of Finance by mail or e-mail within the specified time frame. Protests can be sent to:
Mail:
Michael Solorza, Director of Finance
City of Montebello
Attn: Department of Finance
1600 W. Beverly Blvd
Montebello, CA 90640
or
E-mail:
[email protected]
B. The protest must contain factual and legal reason(s) and should recommend a proposed remedy. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the City reserves the right not to implement the proposed remedy but to offer alternative solutions where applicable.
C. Where appropriate, the City will hold an informal conference on the merits of a protest with all interested parties allowed to attend. Interested parties may include all proposers, subcontractors, or suppliers, provided they have a substantial economic interest in a portion of the RFP.
D. All potential proposers will be advised of a pending protest.
E. The City shall not open proposals prior to the resolution of the protest unless it is determined that:
•The items to be procured are urgently required;
•Delivery or performance will be unduly delayed by failure to make the award promptly; or
•Failure to make a prompt award will otherwise cause undue harm to the City.
The City will respond in writing within ten (10) working days after receipt of a properly filed protest. The Director of Finance will respond and include a response to each substantive issue raised in the protest.
14 After the exhaustion of administrative remedies, the protesting party will be given the City’s final decision. The Director of Finance has the authority to decide on all protests.
Proposal Protest Procedures (After Proposal Opening/Post Award) A protest filed after a proposal opening must be filed within three (3) working days after the proposal opening date. The City will grant the protesting Consultant a fair review and shall have up to ten (10) working days to review the protest and render its decision.
10.0 Execution of Agreement
The resulting agreement (see attached sample Appendix B) shall be signed by the successful Consultant and returned within the required insurance within ten (10) business days after the City has provided written notice that the Consultant has been awarded. Failure to execute the agreement and file acceptable insurance documents as provided herein shall cause, at the City's option, for annulment of the award. Please review the insurance requirements and indemnification clause in the attached sample agreement.
Should the successful Consultant decline to execute the agreement, the City can either reject all proposals, accept one of the other proposals, or issue a new solicitation.
11.0 Insurance
The Consultant selected must meet the following minimum insurance requirements upon execution of the City’s Professional Services Agreement:
A.Commercial General Liability
Commercial General Liability (CGL) (equivalent in coverage scope to Insurance Services Office, Inc. Form CG 00 01) shall cover on an “occurrence” basis for bodily injury and property damage, including premise-operations, products-completed, broad form property damage, blanket contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily injury, and advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, the limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
If requested, the "City of Montebello, its officials, employees, and agents" must be separately endorsed to the policy as additional insureds on an endorsement equivalent to the Insurance Services Office, Inc. Form CG 20 10 11 85 of CG 20 26 1185.
B.Business Automobile Liability
For owned vehicles, hired, and non-owned vehicles, Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if the vendor has not owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non-owned) with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
15 If an automobile is not necessary to perform services, the Firm must submit a written request for a waiver of this requirement.
C.Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions
Depending on the work or services to be performed, professional liability or errors and omissions liability insurance may be required. The City will require the vendor to provide professional liability or errors and omissions liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability.
D.Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability
Workers' compensation as required by the California Labor Code and Employer's Liability in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
Required Insurance Documentation
Certificate of Insurance
The Certificate Holder must be listed as follows:
City of Montebello
1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, CA 90640
Endorsements (if requested)
In addition to the Certificate of Insurance, the vendor must provide the following endorsements:
Additional insured endorsements to the general liability and auto liability* insurance policies. The "City of Montebello, its officials, employees, and agents" must be endorsed to the vendor’s general liability policy as well as the auto liability policy as additional insureds on an endorsement equivalent to ISO forms CG 20 10 11 85 or CG 20 26 11 85.
Cancellation notice endorsements. Each policy must be endorsed to certify that it will not be canceled or non-renewed by either party or reduced in coverage or limits (except by paid claims) unless the insurer has provided the City with thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation (ten (10) days for cancellation due to nonpayment of premium is acceptable).
Primary, non-contributory coverage endorsements. The general liability and professional liability (if required) policies must be endorsed to provide that each policy shall apply on a primary, non-contributing basis with any insurance or self-
16 insurance, primary or excess, maintained by or available to the City or its officials, employees, and agents.
Waiver and Modifications of Insurance Requirements
To the extent permitted by law, the City may modify these insurance requirements at any time and at its sole discretion.
In general, any contract deemed sole source, professional/professional services, involves the disclosure of proprietary information, and/or a public works project may require revisions to the City's standard insurance requirements. Any revisions to the insurance requirements will be identified within the associated service contract terms and conditions.
Consultants may request a waiver or modification of these insurance requirements.
Waiver or modification requests must be submitted in writing. The request should state the specific insurance requirement that is being considered for waiver or modification and provide a brief explanation for the request. Requests will be reviewed on a case-by- case basis, and the decision will ultimately depend on the scope of services. The final decision to approve or deny a request will be at the City's legal authority and/or an authorized designee's discretion.
12.0 Use of Federal Funds
The City may elect to use funding from Federal sources for a portion of or all expenses related to this project. The United States Federal Government requires purchases of items and services to meet specific standards when using Federal funds, including grants, cooperative agreements, contracts, and Federal funds "passed-through" to the City from a non-Federal entity (i.e., sub-recipient agreements). These requirements are codified under the Code of Federal Regulation's (CFR) Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 (also referred to as "2 CFR 200" or "Uniform Guidance") and the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), as applicable.
The following standards apply to all purchases of items and services using Federal funds:
•Transactions shall be conducted lawfully and ethically •Unnecessary/duplicative purchases are not permitted
•Utilizing a vendor or supplier on the U.S. Federal Government's Debarred and Suspended List (available at SAM.gov) is prohibited
•All individuals involved in the expenditure of federal monies must avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest
•Procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition
17 •Opportunities should be provided to minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms when possible •Contracts and purchase orders should include the contract provisions required by 2 CFR 200 Appendix A
•Purchases of goods and services must include documentation detailing the procurement history
In addition to Federal standards, purchases must adhere to applicable local policies and procedures as defined in Montebello Municipal Code Chapters 3.20 and 3.21 and any relevant administrative policies. The most restrictive terms prevail when a conflict is present.
13.0 Non-Commitment of City
While the City intends to select a Consultant through this process, this intention is subject to change at any time during the process. The City does not commit to awarding an agreement, paying any costs incurred in preparing the proposal for this request, and/or procuring or contracting any items or services.
14.0 Labor Requirements
A.Background: All personnel engaged in the performance of this work shall be employees of the Consultant and, as such, shall be warranted to possess sufficient experience and reliability to perform this work.
B.Health: All personnel engaged in the performance of this work shall be in good health and free of contagious diseases. The Consultant shall not allow any person(s) under the influence of alcohol or drugs on the premises or in the building. Neither shall the Consultant allow the use of or presence of alcohol or drugs on the premises or in the building.
C.Non-Discrimination: The Consultant shall not engage in discrimination in the employment of persons because of race, color, national origin, ancestry, mental/physical disabilities, sex, or religion of such persons.
D.Conduct: No person(s) shall be employed for this work that is found to be incompetent, disorderly, and troublesome, under the influence of alcohol and drugs, which fails or otherwise refuses to perform the work properly and acceptably or is otherwise objectionable. Any person found to be objectionable shall be discharged immediately and not re-employed for this work.
15.0 Records
The Consultant agrees to permit the City Manager or designee access to records,
18 reports, files, and other papers or property of the Consultant to audit any performance aspect under this agreement.
16.0 Subcontractors
The Consultant shall be responsible for all work performed under the final agreement and shall keep all work under his control. No portion of the work may be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City. All subcontractors used on this work shall be under the direct supervision of the Consultant and shall be considered as their employees. Any approved subcontractors must provide insurance indemnifying the City with limits at or exceeding the limits of the Contractor's insurance.
17.0 Modifications/Changes
Changes in the areas serviced and/or specifications may be necessary during the agreement term. Changes in the agreement requirements and corresponding changes in compensation may be implemented upon the mutual understanding between the City and the Consultant. These changes will be processed through the City Manager.
18.0 Disclosure of Information
A. The Consultant agrees that it will not during or after the term of the agreement, disclose any proprietary information or confidential business information of the City, including but not limited to its costs, charges, operating procedures, or methods of doing business to any person, vendor, corporation, association, or other entity or the general public for any reason or purpose whatsoever, without the prior written consent of the City. Such confidential or proprietary information received by the Consultant shall be used exclusively in connection with the performance of services.
B. The Consultant shall not issue or release for publication any articles, advertising, or publicity matters relating to the services performed by the Consultant hereunder or mentioning or implying the name of the City or its respective personnel without the prior written consent of the City.
19.0 Ex-Parte Communications
Vendor and vendor representatives should not engage in unauthorized communications with elected officials, officers, employees, or agents of the City about this RFP. This requirement also includes any evaluation panel member, except for designated RFP facilitators. This requirement remains in effect until after award notifications have been made.
This restriction does not prohibit vendors and their representatives from making oral statements or presentations to City representatives during a scheduled public meeting.
20.0 City of Montebello Rights
19 At its discretion, the City reserves the right to:
A. Reject any and/or all proposals for no reason or any reason including, but not limited to, the following:
i. The proposal is incomplete, non-responsive, obscure, irregular, or lacking necessary detail and specificity.
ii. The Consultant, in the sole judgment of the City, lacks the qualifications, experience, and/or responsibility necessary to provide the services. iii. The Consultant failed or neglected to complete and submit any information within the time specified by the City and as may be otherwise required herein.
B. Reject any proposal that, in the opinion of the City, is so unbalanced in comparison to other proposals received and/or to the City’s internal estimates that it does not accurately reflect the cost to perform;
C. Accept all or any part of a proposal;
D. Cancel the entire RFP;
E. Issue subsequent RFPs; or
F. Waive any errors or informalities in any proposal to the extent law permits.
Please review:
Appendix A – Proposal Content and Format
Appendix B – Sample Professional Services Agreement
Appendix C – Non-Disclosure Agreement
Appendix D – Site Plans – City Hall & Police Department
ITEM # 18
CITY OF MONTEBELLO
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Arlene Salazar, Acting City Manager
BY: Adrianna Kendricks, Director of Transportation
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 23-64 AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF
FINANCE TO SUBMIT A CLAIM FOR FUNDING PROVIDED BY THE
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT THROUGH THE LOCAL
TRANSPORTATION FUND AND THE STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE
FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
DATE: September 13, 2023
RECOMMENDATION(S):
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 23-64 authorizing the Director of Finance to submit a claim for funding provided by the Transportation Development Act (TDA) through the Local Transportation Fund and the State Transit Assistance Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24; and
2. Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Senate Bill 325–The Transportation Development Act (TDA) of 1971, provides annual funding to public transportation operators through the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and the State Transit Assistance (STA) Fund. These funds are made available for eligible transit and non-transit related projects provided certain conditions are met. The LTF may be use for local streets and roads, construction, and maintenance if there are no unmet transit needs. Conversely, STA funding can only be used for transportation planning and mass transportation purposes.
The City of Montebello will receive a TDA allocation of $15,153,253 (LTF – $13,454,796 and STA – $1,698,456) for FY 2023-24 (see Attachment A), to be used for transit operating expenditures. The TDA allocation is included in Montebello Bus Lines’ (MBL’s) FY 2023-24 adopted operating budget. A TDA claim form indicating where funds will be
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
used must be submitted to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) for review. Once approved, MBL will receive a direct deposit allocation monthly to be used for operating expenses.
Projects eligible for LTF and STA funding are identified as follows:
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The TDA of 1971 was enacted to improve existing public transportation services and encourage regional transportation coordination. The TDA established two (2) funding sources:
• LTF- is derived from a ¼ cent of the general sales tax collected statewide. The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA), based on sales tax collected in each county, returns the general sales tax revenues to each county’s LTF. Each county then apportions the LTF funds within the county based on population.
• STA - is appropriated by the legislature to the State Controller’s Office (SCO). The SCO then allocates the tax revenue, by formula, to planning agencies and other selected agencies. Statute requires that 50% of STA funds be allocated according to population and 50% be allocated according to transit operator revenues from the prior fiscal year.
Metro is the local planning agency designated to administer the distribution of these funds to transit agencies in Los Angeles County. As the state-designated administrator, Metro requires that public transportation operators submit annual TDA claim forms signed by the Chief Financial Officer to claim LTF and STA funds (see Attachment B). In addition, Metro requires MLB’s Governing Board (Board) to approve a Resolution attesting to the use of these funds and the submission of the claim form(s) as an annual standard procedure. For all intents and purposes, the Montebello City Council here serves as MBL’s “Board".
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
ENVIRONMENTAL:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The City operates MBL to provide fixed route service to the cities of Alhambra, Bell Gardens, Commerce, Los Angeles, La Mirada, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, San Marino, South Gate and Whittier. Therefore, a consistent need exists to maintain access to available funding opportunities for the continued delivery of transportation services to the City and surrounding communities.
To ensure the City is able to continually access LTF and STA funding, the City must submit an annual TDA claim form. These forms must be approved through a City Council Resolution as MBL’s “Board” (see Attachment C).
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 23-64 authorizing the Director of Finance as the City’s Chief Financial Officer to submit a claim form for funding provided by the Transportation Development Act through the LTF and the STA funding sources for FY 2023-2024; and take such additional, related, action that may be desirable.
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. ATTACHMENT A - Adopted Transit Fund Allocations FY 2023-24
2. ATTACHMENT B - TDA Claim Form
3. ATTACHMENT C - Resolution No. 23-64
NEXT STEPS:
N/A
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
Los
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Fiscal Year 2024
TRANSIT FUND ALLOCATIONS
ADOPTED
Ju
ly 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024
June 22, 2023
ATTACHMENT A
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
FY 2024
ADOPTED
Transit Fund Allocations
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
State and Local Funds:
Preliminary Rev enue Estimates .............................................................................. 1-2 State and Local Funds Summary............................................................................ 3 Bus Transit Funding % Shares................................................................................ 4 Included and Eligible Operators Estimated Funding Lev els......................................... 5 Proposition C 5% Transit Security Funding Allocation .............................................. 6 Proposition C 40% Discretionary Programs………………………………………………… 7 Municipal Operators Service Improvement Program (MOSIP) , Zero-Fare Compensation for Commerce, Foothill Transit Mitigation , Transit Service Expansion , Discretionary Base Restructuring , BSIP, Overcrowding Relief
Measure R 20% Bus Operation Allocations ............................................................. 8 Measure M 20% Transit Operations ........................................................................ 9 Senate Bill 1 STA and SGR Funding Allocations…………………………………………… 10 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Fund Exchange………………………………… 11 Tier 2 Operators Estimated Funding Lev els .............................................................. 12 Incentiv e Programs ............................................................................................... 13-15 Local Returns, TDA Articles 3 & 8 .......................................................................... 16-18 Rev enue Estimates ............................................................................................. 19 Summary ............................................................................................................ 20 Federal Section 5307 Urbanized Formula Program ................................................... 21 Federal Section 5337 State of Good Repair.............................................................. 22 Federal Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities ........................................................... 23 Capital Allocation Procedure - % Share Calculation .................................................. 24-25 Table of Contents
I. BUS TRANSIT SUBSIDIES
II. LOCAL SUBSIDIES
III. FEDERAL FORMULA GRANTS
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
Bus Transit Subsidies
STATE AND LOCAL FUNDS
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
1 FY24 Estimated
Revenue
Carryover
FY22
Budget vs Actual
Interest
FY22 Actual
FY24
Total Funds
Available
N
O
T
E
FY23
Total Funds
Transportation Development Act:
Planning & Administration:
1 Planning - Metro 6,000,000$ 6,000,000$ 5,159,000$ 2 Planning - SCAG 4,500,000 4,500,000 3,869,250 3 Administration - Metro 4,378,855 4,378,855 3,909,692 4 Sub-total 14,878,855 14,878,855 12,937,942 5 Article 3 Pedestrian & Bikeways 2.0000% 11,702,423 1,853,156 36,032 13,591,611 11,144,314 6 Article 4 Bus Transit 90.7918% 531,242,243 84,125,722 1,635,695 617,003,660 508,403,193 7 Article 8 Streets & Highways 7.2082% 42,176,480 6,678,925 129,861 48,985,266 37,668,206 8 Total 600,000,000 92,657,803 1,801,588 694,459,391 570,153,654 Proposition A:
9 Administration 5.0000% 60,000,000 11,310,295 71,310,295 58,250,104 10 Local Return 25.0000% 285,000,000 n/a 285,000,000 a 245,052,500 11 Rail Development 35.0000% 399,000,000 75,213,460 474,213,460 387,363,192 Bus Transit: 40.0000%
12 279,341,351 n/a 279,341,351 b 269,348,521 13 95% of 40% Over CPI 153,858,649 n/a 153,858,649 c 103,131,279 14 Sub-total 433,200,000 - 433,200,000 372,479,800 15 5% of 40% Incentive 22,800,000 4,297,912 27,097,912 22,135,040 16 Total 1,200,000,000 90,821,666 1,290,821,666 1,085,280,636 Proposition C:
17 Administration 1.5000% 18,000,000 3,393,045 21,393,045 17,475,155 18 Rail/Bus Security 5.0000% 59,100,000 11,140,498 70,240,498 57,376,760 19 Commuter Rail 10.0000% 118,200,000 22,280,996 140,480,996 114,753,520 20 Local Return 20.0000% 236,400,000 n/a 236,400,000 a 203,264,600 21 Freeways and Highways 25.0000% 295,500,000 55,702,489 351,202,489 286,883,800 22 Discretionary 40.0000% 472,800,000 89,123,983 561,923,983 459,014,080 23 Total 1,200,000,000 181,641,011 1,381,641,011 1,138,767,916 State Transit Assistance: d
24 Bus (PUC 99314 Rev Base Share) 45,109,292 34,638,409 154,481 79,902,182 60,136,246 25 Rail (PUC 99313 Population Share) 58,209,440 26,503,605 99,713 84,812,758 46,500,350 26 Total 103,318,732 61,142,014 254,194 164,714,940 106,636,596 SB 1 State Transit Assistance: d,e
27 Bus (PUC 99314 Rev Base Share) 36,956,876 28,741,708 127,740 65,826,324 f 50,239,195 28 Rail (PUC 99313 Population Share) 47,689,486 21,993,329 82,579 69,765,394 38,843,608 29 Total 84,646,363 50,735,037 210,319 135,591,719 89,082,803 SB 1 State Of Good Repair e
30 Bus (PUC 99314 Rev Base Share) 11,636,592 1,624,468 146,937 13,407,997 f 22,636,276 31 Rail (PUC 99313 Population Share) 15,015,963 1,295,057 49,197 16,360,217 17,461,658 32 Total 26,652,555 2,919,525 196,134 29,768,214 40,097,934
STATE AND LOCAL
95% of 40% Capped at CPI 3.71%
Fiscal Year 2024
PRELIMINARY REVENUE ESTIMATES
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
2 FY24 Estimated
Revenue
Carryover
FY22
Budget vs Actual
Interest
FY22 Actual
FY24
Total Funds
Available
N
O
T
E
FY23
Total FundsSTATE AND LOCAL
Fiscal Year 2024
PRELIMINARY REVENUE ESTIMATES (continued)
Measure R:
33 Administration 1.5000% 18,000,000 3,392,424 (374,239) 21,018,185 17,233,321 34 Transit Capital - "New Rail" 35.0000% 413,700,000 77,969,202 3,037,464 494,706,666 401,121,258 35 Transit Capital - Metrolink 3.0000% 35,460,000 6,683,074 (448,272) 41,694,802 34,519,578 36 Transit Capital - Metro Rail 2.0000% 23,640,000 4,455,383 (142,630) 27,952,753 23,126,692 37 Highway Capital 20.0000% 236,400,000 44,553,830 (1,482,240) 279,471,590 228,958,160 38 Operations "New Rail" 5.0000% 59,100,000 11,138,457 (1,079,162) 69,159,295 57,495,727 39 Operations Bus 20.0000% 236,400,000 44,553,830 (4,713,883) 276,239,947 230,272,491 40 Local Return 15.0000% 177,300,000 n/a n/a 177,300,000 a 152,448,450 41 Total 1,200,000,000 192,746,199 (5,202,962) 1,387,543,237 1,145,175,678 Measure M:
Local Return Supplemental & Administration:
42 Administration 0.5000% 6,180,000 1,158,407 (50,332) 7,288,075 5,999,954 43 Supplemental transfer to Local Return 1.0000% 11,820,000 n/a n/a 11,820,000 a,g 10,163,230 44 Sub-total 18,000,000 1,158,407 (50,332) 19,108,075 16,163,184 45 Local Return Base 16.0000% 189,120,000 n/a n/a 189,120,000 a,g 162,611,680 46 Metro Rail Operations 5.0000% 59,100,000 11,077,970 (1,074,801) 69,103,169 57,437,894 47 Transit Operations ( Metro & Municipal Provide 20.0000% 236,400,000 44,311,878 (4,705,465) 276,006,413 229,911,476 48 ADA Paratransit/Metro Discounts for Seniors & S 2.0000% 23,640,000 4,431,188 93,938 28,165,126 22,871,140 49 Transit Construction 35.0000% 413,700,000 77,545,787 3,326,865 494,572,652 401,783,182 50 Metro State of Good Repairs 2.0000% 23,640,000 4,431,188 (172,125) 27,899,063 22,981,549 51 Highway Construction 17.0000% 200,940,000 37,665,096 (6,490,223) 232,114,873 195,049,184 52 Metro Active Transportation Program 2.0000% 23,640,000 4,431,188 (609,516) 27,461,672 22,974,153 53 Regional Rail 1.0000% 11,820,000 2,215,594 (84,424) 13,951,170 11,442,142 54 Total 1,200,000,000 187,268,295 (9,766,083) 1,377,502,212 1,143,225,584 55 Total Funds Available 5,614,617,649$ 859,931,550$ (12,506,810)$ 6,462,042,390$ h 5,318,420,800$ 56 117,058,855$ 19,254,170$ (424,571)$ 135,888,454$ 111,896,476$ Notes:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
Local Return Subfunds do not show carryover balances. These funds are distributed in the same period received.
Consumer price index (CPI) of 3.71% represents the average estimated growth rate based on various forecasting sources and historical trends applied to Prop A discretionary allocated to Included operators.
Proposition A 95% of 40% Bus Transit growth over CPI estimate will be used to fund Eligible and Tier 2 operators. The carryover is not shown since it has been converted into Proposition C 40% discretionary to fund various Board-approved discretionary programs.
Total Planning & Admin Allocations:
(Lines 4, 9, 17, 33 and 42)
STA Revenue estimates (including SB1/STA) from the State Controller's office is reduced by 10% for the revenue base share and population-base share due to anticipated shortfall of FY24 revenue.
In order to be eligible for SB1-SGR funding, eligible agencies must comply with various reporting requirements. SGR revenue estimates from the State Controller's Office are reduced by 5% due to the anticipated shortfall of FY24 revenue.
STA and SGR portion of SB1 will be allocated based on Measure R allocation methodology.
Measure M provides for a total of 17% net revenues for Local Return. Supplement of 1% to be funded by 1.5% Administration.
Per government accounting standards, reported interest is derived from the fair value of investments as of the end of FY22. Based on market conditions at that time, the amounts may be positive or negative.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
3 TDA Article 4 +
Interest STA + Interest
Proposition A
95% of 40 %
Discretionary Sub-Total FAP
20% Bus
Operations
Clean Fuel &
Facilities
STA State of Good
Repair
Included Operators:
1 Metro Bus Operations 452,127,185$ 59,217,703$ 206,753,872$ 718,098,760$ 51,827,296$ 11,970,998$ 190,352,258$ 6,247,544$ 190,191,334$ 45,359,803$ 9,205,703$ 1,223,253,696$ Municipal Operators:
2 Arcadia 559,754 68,974 241,136 869,864 8,148 111,391 221,714 17,687 221,526 52,833 10,722 1,513,886 3 Claremont 194,663 24,211 84,644 303,518 1,649 30,506 77,826 2,173 77,760 18,545 3,764 515,742 4 Commerce 753,721 88,345 308,858 1,150,924 50,350 1,470,936 283,981 35,807 283,741 67,671 13,734 3,357,144 5 Culver City 8,890,979 1,117,976 3,908,491 13,917,445 462,957 1,867,490 3,593,676 136,701 3,590,638 856,352 173,795 24,599,055 6 Foothill Transit 42,086,364 5,301,909 18,535,694 65,923,967 1,378,518 9,000,816 17,042,713 954,290 17,028,305 4,061,177 824,210 116,213,996 7 Gardena 8,690,038 1,095,248 3,829,032 13,614,318 326,530 2,353,409 3,520,618 114,107 3,517,641 838,942 170,262 24,455,827 8 La Mirada 486,696 19,657 68,723 575,076 5,033 24,768 63,188 7,007 63,134 15,057 3,056 756,319 9 Long Beach 39,535,684 4,940,880 17,547,201 62,023,765 3,554,049 9,713,831 15,882,204 694,066 15,868,777 3,784,634 768,086 112,289,412 10 Montebello 13,454,796 1,698,456 5,937,874 21,091,126 538,699 3,663,972 5,459,600 192,374 5,454,985 1,300,990 264,034 37,965,779 11 Norwalk 5,162,141 648,408 2,266,860 8,077,409 161,161 880,177 2,084,273 70,555 2,082,511 496,670 100,798 13,953,554 12 Redondo Beach 1,336,051 166,665 582,669 2,085,386 60,296 214,483 535,738 31,983 535,285 127,663 25,909 3,616,742 13 Santa Monica 33,349,039 4,214,750 14,734,940 52,298,729 1,288,566 6,205,679 13,548,096 473,138 13,536,642 3,228,430 655,205 91,234,485 14 Torrance 10,376,549 1,299,000 4,541,358 16,216,906 429,922 3,630,319 4,175,568 131,753 4,172,038 995,013 201,936 29,953,455 15 Sub-Total 164,876,475 20,684,479 72,587,479 258,148,433 8,265,877 39,167,778 66,489,194 2,861,641 66,432,984 15,843,977 3,215,511 460,425,396 Eligible Operators:
16 Antelope Valley - - 6,367,820 6,367,820 227,362 1,862,567 4,307,290 203,747 4,303,648 1,026,401 208,307 18,507,142 17 LADOT - - 36,418,908 36,418,908 2,524,222 6,912,658 9,581,472 480,647 9,573,372 2,283,207 463,373 68,237,861 18 Santa Clarita - - 5,451,954 5,451,954 371,692 1,431,704 3,583,881 206,420 3,580,851 854,017 173,322 15,653,841 19 Foothill BSCP - - 7,320,107 7,320,107 - 603,328 1,925,851 - 1,924,223 458,919 93,137 12,325,566 20 Sub-Total - - 55,558,790 55,558,790 3,123,275 10,810,257 19,398,494 890,815 19,382,094 4,622,545 938,138 114,724,409 Tier 2 Operators:
21 LADOT Community Dash - - 6,588,062 6,588,062 - - - - - - - 6,588,062 22 Glendale - - 1,092,249 1,092,249 - - - - - - - 1,092,249 23 Pasadena - - 529,965 529,965 - - - - - - - 529,965 24 Burbank - - 192,263 192,263 - - - - - - 192,263 25 Sub-Total - - 8,402,539 8,402,539 - - - - - - - 8,402,539 26 Lynwood Trolley - - - - - 242,307 - - - - - 242,307 26 LTSS ZEV CFP 15,000,000 15,000,000
27 Total Excluding Metro 164,876,475 20,684,479 136,548,808 322,109,762 11,389,153 65,220,342 85,887,688 3,752,456 85,815,079 20,466,522 4,153,649 598,794,651 28 County of Los Angeles 48,645 48,645
29 Grand Total 617,003,660$ 79,902,182$ 343,302,680$ 1,040,208,522$ 63,216,448$ 77,191,341$ 276,239,947$ 10,000,000$ 276,006,413$ 65,826,324$ 13,407,997$ 1,822,096,992$
STATE AND LOCAL FUNDS
Formula Allocation Procedure Measure R Senate Bill 1
Operators Proposition C
5% Security
Measure
M
Proposition C
40%
Discretionary
Total
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
4 Operators
Vehicle Service
Miles (VSM)
FY22 Data (1)
Passenger
Revenue
Base
Fare Fare Units
Fare Units
Prior to Fare
Increase/
decrease
Fare Units
Used in FAP (2)
Sum
50% VSM +
50% Fare
Units
Proposition A
Base Share
DAR Cap
Adjustment (3) TDA/STA Share
Included Operators
1 Metro Bus Operations (4) 63,247,751 48,117,395$ 1.75$ 27,495,654 197,161,600 197,161,600 130,204,676 74.1127% 0.0000% 74.1127% 2 Arcadia DR 54,153 4,138 0.50 8,276 72,829 72,829 63,491 0.0361% 0.0000% 0.0361% 3 Arcadia MB (5) 161,751 7,290 0.50 14,580 - 14,580 88,166 0.0502% 0.0000% 0.0502% 4 Claremont 24,629 10,742 2.50 4,297 81,840 81,840 53,235 0.0303% 0.0000% 0.0303% 5 Commerce 388,497 - - - - - 194,249 0.1106% 0.0000% 0.1106% 6 Culver City 1,243,082 1,065,143 1.00 1,065,143 3,673,208 3,673,208 2,458,145 1.3992% 0.0000% 1.3992% 7 Foothill Transit 9,094,100 6,110,456 1.75 3,491,689 14,221,000 14,221,000 11,657,550 6.6355% 0.0000% 6.6355% 8 Gardena 1,112,743 1,115,630 1.00 1,115,630 3,703,600 3,703,600 2,408,172 1.3707% 0.0000% 1.3707% 9 La Mirada (5) 50,841 35,602 1.00 35,602 35,602 43,222 0.0246% 0.0000% 0.0246% 10 Long Beach 5,755,022 6,735,804 1.25 5,388,643 15,972,456 15,972,456 10,863,739 6.1837% 0.0000% 6.1837% 11 Montebello 1,613,391 1,856,014 1.10 1,687,285 5,855,556 5,855,556 3,734,474 2.1257% 0.0000% 2.1257% 12 Norwalk 757,299 156,775 1.25 125,420 2,094,068 2,094,068 1,425,684 0.8115% 0.0000% 0.8115% 13 Redondo Beach DR (5) 41,978 12,084 1.00 12,084 12,084 27,031 0.0154% 0.0000% 0.0154% 14 Redondo Beach MB (5) 377,761 301,087 1.00 301,087 301,087 339,424 0.1932% 0.0000% 0.1932% 15 Santa Monica 3,872,993 5,548,734 1.25 4,438,987 14,661,333 14,661,333 9,267,163 5.2749% 0.0000% 5.2749% 16 Torrance 1,202,341 337,534 1.00 337,534 4,510,000 4,510,000 2,856,171 1.6257% 0.0000% 1.6257% 17 Sub-Total 88,998,332 71,414,428 45,521,912 262,370,843 175,684,588 100.0000% 0.0000% 100.0000% Eligible Operators
18 Antelope Valley 2,779,424 1,785,985 1.50 1,190,657 3,543,241 3,543,241 3,161,333 1.6770% 0.0000% 1.6770% 19 Santa Clarita (5) 2,163,153 3,097,621 1.00 3,097,621 3,097,621 2,630,387 1.3954% 0.0000% 1.3954% 20 LADOT Local 2,597,911 38,110 0.50 76,220 6,727,520 6,727,520 4,662,716 2.4735% 0.0000% 2.4735% 21 LADOT Express 1,586,368 554,586 1.50 369,724 3,152,832 3,152,832 2,369,600 1.2570% 0.0000% 1.2570% 22 Foothill - BSCP 1,198,312 727,599 1.50 485,066 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,424,156 0.7498% 0.0000% 0.7498% 23 Sub-Total 10,325,168 6,203,901 5,219,288 18,171,214 14,248,191 7.5527% 0.0000% 7.5527% 24 Total 99,323,500 77,618,329 50,741,200 280,542,057 189,932,779 Notes:
(5) The fare unit used in FAP has been maintained at FY19 level. (3) TDA cap of 0.25% is applied for DAR operators - Arcadia, Claremont, La Mirada and Redondo Beach DR. (4) MTA Statistics include contracted services with LADOT for Lines 422, 601 and 602 (Consent Decree Lines), Glendale and Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority (PVPTA). (2) Fare units used are frozen to the level prior to fare change in accordance with the Funding Stability Policy, adopted by the Board in November 2007. (1) Operators' statistics exclude BSIP, TSE, Base Restructuring and MOSIP services that are funded from PC 40% Discretionary. Also excluded are services funded from other sources (CRD, federal, etc.)
BUS TRANSIT FUNDING PERCENTAGE SHARES
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
5 STA Total
TDA & STA Rev Base Share Formula
% Shares Plus Interest Funds
Included Operators
1 Metro Bus Operations 74.1127% 457,278,367$ (5,151,182)$ 452,127,185$ 59,217,703$ 74.1127% 206,753,872$ 718,098,760$ (273,680)$ 2 Arcadia DR 0.0361% 222,980 222,980 28,876 0.0361% 100,952 352,808 3 Arcadia MB 0.0502% 309,637 27,137 336,774 40,098 0.0502% 140,185 517,057 4 Claremont 0.0303% 186,959 7,704 194,663 24,211 0.0303% 84,644 303,518 5 Commerce 0.1106% 682,200 71,521 753,721 88,345 0.1106% 308,858 1,150,924 6 Culver City 1.3992% 8,632,997 257,982 8,890,979 1,117,976 1.3992% 3,908,491 13,917,445 7 Foothill Transit 6.6355% 40,941,275 1,145,089 42,086,364 5,301,909 6.6355% 18,535,694 65,923,967 8 Gardena 1.3707% 8,457,490 232,548 8,690,038 1,095,248 1.3707% 3,829,032 13,614,318 9 La Mirada (4) 0.0246% 151,794 334,902 486,696 19,657 0.0246% 68,723 575,076 10 Long Beach (5) 6.1837% 38,153,414 1,382,270 39,535,684 4,940,880 6.1837% 17,547,201 62,023,765 273,680 11 Montebello 2.1257% 13,115,458 339,338 13,454,796 1,698,456 2.1257% 5,937,874 21,091,126 12 Norwalk 0.8115% 5,006,995 155,146 5,162,141 648,408 0.8115% 2,266,860 8,077,409 13 Redondo Beach DR 0.0154% 94,933 94,933 12,294 0.0154% 42,980 150,206 14 Redondo Beach MB 0.1932% 1,192,056 49,062 1,241,118 154,372 0.1932% 539,690 1,935,179 15 Santa Monica 5.2749% 32,546,244 802,795 33,349,039 4,214,750 5.2749% 14,734,940 52,298,729 16 Torrance 1.6257% 10,030,861 345,688 10,376,549 1,299,000 1.6257% 4,541,358 16,216,906 17 Sub-Total 100.0000% 617,003,660 - 617,003,660 79,902,182 100.0000% 279,341,351 976,247,193 Eligible Operators
(6)
18 Antelope Valley (7) 1.6770% - 343,224 343,224 1,339,978 1.6770% 4,684,618 6,367,820$ 19 Santa Clarita (7) 1.3954% - 439,189 439,189 1,114,929 1.3954% 3,897,837 5,451,954 20 LADOT Local 2.4735% 15,261,437 15,261,437 1,976,361 2.4735% 6,909,441 24,147,240 21 LADOT Express 1.2570% 7,755,889 7,755,889 1,004,390 1.2570% 3,511,390 12,271,669 22 Foothill - BSCP 0.7498% 4,626,423 4,626,423 599,123 0.7498% 2,094,560 7,320,107 23 Sub-Total 7.5527% 27,643,749 782,413 28,426,162 6,034,781 7.5527% 21,097,846 55,558,790 24 Total FAP 617,003,660$ 617,003,660$ 79,902,182$ 107.5527% 279,341,351$ 1,031,805,983$ -$ Proposition A Discretionary (95% of 40%) Growth Over CPI:
25 Revenue 153,858,649$
Uses of Fund:
26 Eligible Operators - Formula Equivalent Funds 55,558,790 27 Tier 2 Operators (8) 8,402,539
28 Total Uses of Funds 63,961,329
29 Proposition A Discretionary (95% of 40%) GOI Transfer to PC 40% based on Board policy. 89,897,320 30 Backfill from (Transfer to) PC40% Discretionary (89,897,320) 31 Total -$
Notes:
(1) Included Operators' share of LCTOP fund will be exchanged with Metro's TDA Article 4 allocation. (2) Prop A Discretionary funds (95% of 40%) allocated to Included Operators have been capped at 3.71% CPI for FAP allocation. (3) The Two-Year Lag Column is for information only. THESE AMOUNTS ARE ALREADY INCLUDED IN PROP A DISCRETIONARY Allocations. (4) The City of La Mirada has requested to exchange its FY18 5307 funds, totaling $161,686, and its FY19 funds totaling $158,447 , with Metro's TDA 4 funds. (5) Funds allocated to the SCRTTC through Long Beach Transit will be exchanged with Metro's TDA Article 4 share. (7) Antelope Valley and Santa Clarita's LCTOP fund will be exchanged with Metro's Prop C 40% Discretionary transfer to Proposition A Discretionary GOI. (8) The Board has approved an adjustment in the funding for Tier II operators for FY24, increasing the annual cap from $6 million to $8.2 million, with subsequent annual adjustments based on the CPI.
Formula Equivalent Funded from Proposition A 95% of 40% Growth over CPI Operators
Allocated Net
TDA Article 4 plus interest
Fund Exchange
(1)
Prop A
Discretionary %
Shares
Prop A
Discretionary
Allocations (2)
INCLUDED & ELIGIBLE OPERATORS ESTIMATED FUNDING LEVELS
Two Year Lag
Funding
(3)
(6) Formula Equivalent funds are allocated by formula to Eligible Operators based on PUC 99207.5. Fund source is Prop A 95% of 40% growth over CPI.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
6 1 Antelope Valley 1,113,754 0.3597% 227,362$
2 Arcadia 39,916 0.0129% 8,148
3 Claremont 8,078 0.0026% 1,649
4 Commerce 246,643 0.0796% 50,350
5 Culver City 2,267,843 0.7323% 462,957
6 Foothill Transit 6,752,806 2.1806% 1,378,518
7 Gardena 1,599,539 0.5165% 326,530
8 LADOT Local/Express 12,365,151 3.9930% 2,524,222
9 La Mirada 24,653 0.0080% 5,033
10 Long Beach 17,409,861 5.6220% 3,554,049
11 Montebello 2,638,870 0.8521% 538,699
12 Norwalk 789,462 0.2549% 161,161
13 Redondo Beach DR/MB 295,365 0.0954% 60,296
14 Santa Clarita 1,820,768 0.5880% 371,692
15 Santa Monica 6,312,168 2.0383% 1,288,566
16 Torrance 2,106,014 0.6801% 429,922
17 Sub-Total 55,790,891 18.0161% 11,389,153
18 Metro Bus/Rail Operations (2) 253,881,136 81.9839% 51,827,296 19 Total 309,672,027 100.0000% 63,216,448$
Notes:
Estimated Revenue: 70,240,498$
90% Thereof: 63,216,448$
(2) Metro operations data includes unlinked passengers for bus and rail. (1) Total funding is 90% of Prop C 5% Transit Security:
Operators FY22 Unlinked
Passengers
Percent of Total
Unlinked Passengers Total (1)
PROPOSITION C 5% TRANSIT SECURITY FUNDING ALLOCATION
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
7 Prop A
% S ha r e % S ha r e $ Allocation
INCLUDED OPERATORS
1 Metro Bus Operations (2) -$ 13,995,592$ -$ -$ 12,975,406$ 26,970,998$ 2 Metro exchange (3) (10,000,000) (5,000,000) (15,000,000) 3 Metro Sub-total 3,995,592 7,975,406 11,970,998 4 Arcadia 0.0863% 0.2581% 69,458 17,449 - - 24,484 111,391 5 Claremont 0.0303% 0.0906% 24,381 6,125 - - - 30,506 6 Commerce 0.1106% 0.3306% 88,965 1,079,403 22,349 - 280,219 - 1,470,936 7 Culver City 1.3992% 4.1842% 1,125,822 282,819 270,101 - 188,748 1,867,490 8 Foothill Transit 6.6355% 19.8430% 5,339,119 - 373,843 2,243,392 1,044,461 9,000,816 9 Gardena 1.3707% 4.0991% 1,102,935 277,069 776,368 - 197,037 2,353,409 10 La Mirada 0.0246% 0.0736% 19,795 4,973 - - - 24,768 11 Long Beach 6.1837% 18.4918% 4,975,556 1,249,915 2,563,169 - 925,191 9,713,831 12 Montebello 2.1257% 6.3567% 1,710,376 429,665 - 1,279,709 244,222 3,663,972 13 Norwalk 0.8115% 2.4267% 652,958 164,030 - - 63,189 880,177 14 Redondo Beach DR/MB 0.2086% 0.6238% 167,835 42,162 - - 4,486 214,483 15 Santa Monica 5.2749% 15.7742% 4,244,330 1,066,222 - - 895,126 6,205,679 16 Torrance 1.6257% 4.8617% 1,308,117 328,613 909,043 814,279 270,267 3,630,319 17 Sub-Total 25.8873% 77.4141% 20,829,649 1,079,403 3,891,392 4,892,525 4,617,599 3,857,211 39,167,778
ELIGIBLE OPERATORS
18 Antelope Valley 1.6770% 5.0150% 1,349,382 36,150 423,309 - 53,726 1,862,567 19 Santa Clarita 1.3954% 4.1728% 1,122,754 30,078 221,403 - 57,469 1,431,704 20 LADOT Local/Express 3.7305% 11.1558% 3,001,671 701,372 3,041,162 - 168,453 6,912,658 21 Foothill - BSCP 0.7498% 2.2423% 603,328 - - - - 603,328 22 Sub-Total 7.5527% 22.5859% 6,077,135 767,600 3,685,874 - 279,649 10,810,257 23 City of Lynwood Trolley 242,307 - - 242,307 24 Total Municipal Operators 33.4400% 100.0000% 26,906,784 1,079,403 4,658,991 8,820,706 4,617,599 4,136,860 50,220,342 25 LTSS ZEV CFP (3) 15,000,000
26 Total 33.4400% 100.0000% 26,906,784$ 1,079,403$ 8,654,583$ 8,820,706$ 4,617,599$ 12,112,266$ 77,191,341$ Last Year 26,123,091$ 8,505,164$ 4,452,414$ 16,500,112$ % Increase 3.00% 3.71% 3.71% 3.71%
Current Year 26,906,784$ 8,820,706$ 4,617,599$ 17,112,266$ Note:
(3) Due to the Infrastructure Inv estment Jobs A ct (IIJA ) leading to greater-than-ex pected 5307 grants, the Board approv ed in June 2022 to allocate $10 million in FY 22, $5 million in FY 24, and $5 million in FY 26 from 5307 to the LTSS. M etro will ex change these amounts with its PC40 fund. In FY 24, $15 million will be deducted from M etro's PC40% fund (Foothill M itigation & BSIP) to cov er FY 22 and FY 24 5307 ex change. (1) A llocated as part of FA P to Commerce as compensation for hav ing z ero passenger rev enues. (2) A ntelope V alley , Santa Clarita, Burbank, and Glendale's, LCTOP fund in the amount of $984,952 will be ex changed with M etro's "Foothill M itigation" Fund. M etro will allocate Prop A Discretionary (95% of 40% ) GOI fund to A ntellope V alley and Santa Clarita.
MOSIP Zero-fare
Compensation
(1)
Foothill
Transit
Mitigation
BSIP
Overcrowding
Relief
Transit
Service
Expansion
Discretionary
Base
Restructuring
PROPOSITION C 40% DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS
TotalOperators
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
8 Included Operators:
1 Metro Bus Operations 74.1127% 68.9083% 190,352,258$ 62.4754% 6,247,544$ 2 Arcadia 0.0863% 0.0803% 221,714 0.1769% 17,687 3 Claremont 0.0303% 0.0282% 77,826 0.0217% 2,173 4 Commerce 0.1106% 0.1028% 283,981 0.3581% 35,807 5 Culver City 1.3992% 1.3009% 3,593,676 1.3670% 136,701 6 Foothill Transit (3) 6.6355% 6.1695% 17,042,713 9.5429% 954,290 7 Gardena 1.3707% 1.2745% 3,520,618 1.1411% 114,107 8 La Mirada 0.0246% 0.0229% 63,188 0.0701% 7,007 9 Long Beach 6.1837% 5.7494% 15,882,204 6.9407% 694,066 10 Montebello 2.1257% 1.9764% 5,459,600 1.9237% 192,374 11 Norwalk 0.8115% 0.7545% 2,084,273 0.7056% 70,555 12 Redondo Beach DR 0.0154% 0.0143% 39,518
13 Redondo Beach MB 0.1932% 0.1796% 496,220
14 Santa Monica 5.2749% 4.9045% 13,548,096 4.7314% 473,138 15 Torrance 1.6257% 1.5116% 4,175,568 1.3175% 131,753 Eligible Operators:
16 Antelope Valley 1.6770% 1.5593% 4,307,290 2.0375% 203,747 17 Santa Clarita 1.3954% 1.2974% 3,583,881 2.0642% 206,420 18 LADOT Local 2.4735% 2.2998% 6,352,912
19 LADOT Express 1.2570% 1.1688% 3,228,561
20 Foothill BSCP (3) 0.7498% 0.6972% 1,925,851 - -
21 Total Municipal Operators 33.4400% 31.0917% 85,887,688 37.5246% 3,752,456 22 Total Funds Allocated 107.5527% 100.0000% 276,239,947$ 100.0000% $ 10,000,000 Notes:
(1) Clean Fuel Capital Facilities and Rolling Stock Funds of $10M will be allocated every even fiscal year. (2) Allocated based on FY22 data.
(3) Foothill Transit Clean Fuel allocation includes the allocation for the Foothill BSCP.
4.8065%
31,983
480,647
MR Percentage
Share
Bus Operations
Allocation
MEASURE R 20% BUS OPERATIONS AND CAPITAL ALLOCATIONS
0.3198%
Proposition A
Base Share %
Federal Section 5307
Capital Allocation
Formula Share (2)
$ Allocation
Clean Fuel Bus Capital Facilities and
Rolling Stock Fund (1)
20% Bus Operations
Operators
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
9 Included Operators:
1 Metro Bus Operations 68.9083% 190,191,334$
2 Arcadia 0.0803% 221,526
3 Claremont 0.0282% 77,760
4 Commerce 0.1028% 283,741
5 Culver City 1.3009% 3,590,638
6 Foothill Transit 6.1695% 17,028,305
7 Gardena 1.2745% 3,517,641
8 La Mirada 0.0229% 63,134
9 Long Beach 5.7494% 15,868,777
10 Montebello 1.9764% 5,454,985
11 Norwalk 0.7545% 2,082,511
12 Redondo Beach DR 0.0143% 39,484
13 Redondo Beach MB 0.1796% 495,800
14 Santa Monica 4.9045% 13,536,642
15 Torrance 1.5116% 4,172,038
Eligible Operators:
16 Antelope Valley 1.5593% 4,303,648
17 Santa Clarita 1.2974% 3,580,851
18 LADOT Local 2.2998% 6,347,541
19 LADOT Express 1.1688% 3,225,831
20 Foothill BSCP 0.6972% 1,924,223
21 Total Municipal Operators 31.0917% 85,815,079
22 Total Funds Allocated 100.0000% 276,006,413$
Notes:
Measure M Percentage
Share (1) $ Allocation Operators
MEASURE M 20% TRANSIT OPERATIONS
(Metro and Municipal Providers)
(1) Metro adheres to the Measure R allocation methodology for Measure M 20% fund allocations.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
10 Included Operators:
1 Metro Bus Operations 68.9083% 45,359,803$ 9,205,703$ 54,565,506$ 2 Arcadia 0.0803% 52,833 10,722 63,555 3 Claremont 0.0282% 18,545 3,764 22,309 4 Commerce 0.1028% 67,671 13,734 81,405 5 Culver City 1.3009% 856,352 173,795 1,030,147 6 Foothill Transit 6.1695% 4,061,177 824,210 4,885,386 7 Gardena 1.2745% 838,942 170,262 1,009,204 8 La Mirada 0.0229% 15,057 3,056 18,113 9 Long Beach 5.7494% 3,784,634 768,086 4,552,720 10 Montebello 1.9764% 1,300,990 264,034 1,565,024 11 Norwalk 0.7545% 496,670 100,798 597,468 12 Redondo Beach DR 0.0143% 9,417 1,911 11,328 13 Redondo Beach MB 0.1796% 118,246 23,998 142,244 14 Santa Monica 4.9045% 3,228,430 655,205 3,883,635 15 Torrance 1.5116% 995,013 201,936 1,196,949 Eligible Operators:
16 Antelope Valley 1.5593% 1,026,401 208,307 1,234,708 17 Santa Clarita 1.2974% 854,017 173,322 1,027,339 18 LADOT Local 2.2998% 1,513,861 307,236 1,821,097 19 LADOT Express 1.1688% 769,347 156,138 925,484 20 Foothill BSCP 0.6972% 458,919 93,137 552,056
21 Total Municipal Operators 31.0917% 20,466,522 4,153,649 24,620,171 22 County of Los Angeles - 48,645 48,645 23 Total Funds Allocated 100.0000% 65,826,324$ 13,407,997$ 79,234,322$ Notes:
(1) The STA and SGR portions of SB1 fund will be distributed based on Measure R allocation methodology. (2) Preliminary estimates. Subject to the submittal of eligible projects.
Total SB1 - SGR
Allocation (2)Operators Measure R
% Share (1)
SB1 - STA
Allocation
Senate Bill 1 - Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
11 1 Metro Bus Ops. 4,471,049$ 984,952$ 5,456,001$ 2 Antelope Valley 343,224$ (343,224) - 3 Arcadia 27,137 (27,137) - 4 Claremont 7,704 (7,704) - 5 Commerce 71,521 (71,521) - 6 Culver City 257,982 (257,982) - 7 Foothill Transit 1,145,089 (1,145,089) - 8 Gardena 232,548 (232,548) - 9 La Mirada 14,769 (14,769) - 10 Long Beach 1,022,270 (1,022,270) - 11 Montebello 339,338 (339,338) - 12 Norwalk 155,146 (155,146) - 13 Redondo Beach 49,062 (49,062) - 14 Santa Clarita 439,189 (439,189) - 15 Santa Monica 802,795 (802,795) - 16 Torrance 345,688 (345,688) - Tier Two Operators
17 Burbank 63,655 (63,655) - 18 Glendale 138,884 (138,884) - 19 Pasadena - -
20 TOTAL 5,456,001$ -$ -$ 5,456,001$ Note:
(2) Included Operators’ share of LCTOP fund will be exchanged with Metro’s TDA Article 4 allocation. (1) Estimated - To be adjusted based on actual allocations.
LOW CARBONTRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM
Eligible Allocation Fiscal Year 2022 - 2023
(3) LCTOP fund will be exchanged with Metro's "Foothill Mitigation Fund" share. Metro will allocate Proposition A Discretionary (95% of 40% ) GOI fund to these operators.
Operators LCTOP Share (1) TDA Fund
Exchange (2)
Prop A GOI / Prop C
40% Fund Exchange (3)
Net Funds
Available (1)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
12 Operators
Vehicle Service
Miles
FY22 data
Passenger
Revenue
Base
Fare
Fare
Units (1),(2)
50% VSM +
50% Fare Units % Share
1 LADOT Community Dash 3,781,837 5,325$ 0.50$ 16,808,232 10,295,035 5.0778% 2 Glendale 791,773 229,016 1.00 2,187,836 1,489,805 0.7348% 3 Pasadena 739,633 687,525 0.75 916,700 828,167 0.4085% 4 Burbank 212,160 189,786 1.00 189,786 200,973 0.0991% 5 Sub-Total 5,525,403 1,111,652 20,102,554 12,813,979 6.3202% 6 Included and Eligible Opera 99,323,500 77,618,329 50,741,200 189,932,779 93.6798% 7 Total 104,848,903 78,729,981$ 70,843,754 202,746,757 100.0000% % Share
TDA Article 4
+ Interest
STA Revenue Base
Share + Interest
Proposition A
Discretionary Total
8 617,003,660$ 79,902,182$ 279,341,351$ $ 976,247,193 9 LADOT Community Dash 5.0778% 31,330,089$ 4,057,257$ 14,184,340$ 49,571,686$ 10 Glendale 0.7348% 4,533,808 587,130 2,052,630 7,173,567 11 Pasadena 0.4085% 2,520,296 326,379 1,141,035 3,987,710 12 Burbank 0.0991% 611,606 79,203 276,897 967,706 13 Total 6.3202% 38,995,798$ 5,049,969$ 17,654,902$ 61,700,669$
13.29% (3) MTA
Allocations (4)
LCTOP fund
Exchange
(5)
FY24 Total
Funds Available
14 LADOT Community Dash 4,163,759$ 539,208$ 1,885,094$ 6,588,062$ -$ 6,588,062$ 15 Glendale 602,542 78,029 272,794 953,365 138,884 1,092,249 16 Pasadena 334,947 43,376 151,643 529,965 - 529,965 17 Burbank 81,282 10,526 36,800 128,608 63,655 192,263 18 Total 5,182,530$ 671,139$ 2,346,331$ 8,200,000$ 202,539$ 8,402,539$ Prop A Incentive
Allocation (6)
Before Tier 2
GOI Allocation
GOI Allocation
Deduction
Net Prop A
Incentive
Allocation
19 LADOT Community Dash 2,414,739$ (320,918)$ 2,093,821$ 20 Glendale 498,481 (66,248) 432,233 21 Pasadena 432,721 (57,508) 375,212 22 Burbank 163,682 (21,753) 141,929 23 Total 3,509,623$ (466,428)$ 3,043,196$ Notes:
(1) The fare unit has been maintained at FY19 level for Burbank and Pasadena Transit. (2) Funding Stability Policy is applied on LADOT and Glendale Fare Units. (3) This percentage is applied as a deduction from Tier 2 Operators' Incentive Program allocations. (6) Estimated - to be Adjusted to Actual apportionment. (5) Burbank and Glendale's LCTOP fund will be exchanged with Metro's "Foothill Mitigation" Fund. Metro will allocate Prop A Discretionary (95% of 40% ) GOI funds to these operators.
Actual Allocation
Funds Allocated to Included Operators
Funds Allocated to Tier 2 Operators
Formula Equivalent Calculation
TIER 2 OPERATORS ESTIMATED FUNDING LEVELS
(4) The Board has approved an adjustment in the funding for Tier II operators for FY24, increasing the annual cap from $6 million to $8.2 million, with subsequent annual adjustments based on the CPI.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
LOCAL SUBSIDIES
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
13 PRIORITY I: EXISTING SUB-REGIONAL PARATRANSIT PROJECTS Total Allocation 1 Agoura Hills 66,450$
2 Antelope Valley, Elderly & Disabled 649,937
3 Culver City Community Transit and LA County 70,197
4 Gardena, Hawthorne and LA County 194,807
5 Glendale Paratransit and La Canada Flintridge 269,419 6 Inglewood Transit and LA County 216,411
7 LA County (Whittier et al) 209,817
8 LA County (Willowbrook) 43,386
9 Los Angeles Taxi & Lift Van, City Ride (1)
492,365
10 Los Angeles Dial-a-Ride, City Ride (1)
1,109,084
11 Monrovia D.A.R. and LA County 103,558
12 Palos Verdes PTA D.A.R. 42,394
13 Palos Verdes PTA - PV Transit 458,012
14 Pasadena Community Transit, San Marino and LA County 478,805 15 Pomona Valley TA - E&D (Get About) 803,438
16 Pomona Valley TA General Public (VC) 74,883
17 Santa Clarita D.A.R. 1,008,737
18 West Hollywood (DAR) 259,246
19 Whittier (DAR) 291,382
20 TOTAL EXISTING SUB-REGIONAL PARATRANSIT PROJECTS 6,842,327$ PRIORITY II: SERVICES THAT RECEIVE GROWTH OVER INFLATION (IF PROP A DISC. CANNOT FULLY FUND THESE SYSTEMS)
21 City of L.A. - Bus Service Continuation Project/DASH/Central City Shuttle -$ 22 Santa Clarita - Local Fixed Route -
23 Antelope Valley - Local Fixed Route -
24 Foothill - Bus Service Continuation Project -
25 (IF PROP A DISC. CANNOT FULLY FUND THESE SYSTEMS) -$ 26 PRIORITY III: APPROVED EXISTING EXPANDED PARATRANSIT -$ 27 PRIORITY IV: APPROVED NEW EXPANDED PARATRANSIT SERVICES -$ PROPOSITION A 5% OF 40% DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
14 PROPOSITION A 5% OF 40% DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS (Continued) (In Order of Priority)
Priority V: VOLUNTARY NTD DATA REPORTING
(Estimated - to be Adjusted to Actual apportionment)
FY22 NTD Report Year Estimate
Tier 2
Deduction (3) Total Allocation
28 City of Alhambra (MB and DR) 144,875$ 144,875$ 29 City of Artesia (DR) 2,249 2,249
30 City of Azusa (DR) 26,289 26,289
31 City of Baldwin Park (MB and DR) 112,798 112,798 32 City of Bell (MB/DR) 30,927 30,927
33 City of Bell Gardens (MB and DR) 66,331 66,331 34 City of Bellflower (MB and DR) 47,156 47,156 35 City of Burbank (MB)* (1) 134,566 (15,917) 118,649 36 City of Calabasas (MB and DR) 43,239 43,239 37 City of Carson (MB and DT) 35,683 35,683 38 City of Cerritos (MB and DR ) 21,574 21,574 39 City of Compton (MB and DR) 105,585 105,585 40 City of Covina (DR) 24,920 24,920
41 City of Cudahy (MB and DR) 31,394 31,394 42 City of Downey (MB and DR) 82,147 82,147 43 City of Duarte (MB) - -
44 City of El Monte (MB and DR) 133,926 133,926 45 City of Glendora (MB and DR) 49,864 49,864 46 City of Glendale (MB)* (1) 437,920 (60,561) 377,358 47 City of Huntington Park (MB) 157,801 157,801 48 City of Los Angeles -- Community DASH* (MB) (1) 2,414,739 (234,818) 2,179,921 49 City of Los Angeles -- Department of Aging (DR) (1) 96,782 96,782 50 LA County Dept. of Public Works -- Avocado Heights (MB) 22,246 22,246 51 LA County Dept. of Public Works -- East Valinda (MB) 25,174 25,174 52 LA County Dept. of Public Works -- East LA (MB and DR) 147,526 147,526 53 LA County Dept. of Public Works -- Willowbrook (MB) 41,957 41,957 54 LA County Dept. of Public Works -- King Medical (MB) 21,279 21,279 55 LA County Dept. of Public Works -- Athens (MB) 20,877 20,877 56 LA County Dept. of Public Works -- Lennnox (MB) 17,179 17,179 57 LA County Dept. of Public Works -- South Whittier (MB) 111,431 111,431 58 LA County Dept. of Public Works -- Florance/Firestone (MB) 32,174 32,174 59 City of Lakewood (DR) 29,684 29,684
60 City of Lawndale (MB) 38,110 38,110
61 City of Lynwood (MB) 78,534 78,534
62 City of Malibu (DT) 3,336 3,336
63 City of Manhattan Beach (DR) 19,798 19,798 64 City of Maywood (MB and DR) 23,623 23,623 65 City of Monterey Park (MB and DR) 9,557 9,557 66 City of Pasadena (MB)* 390,641 (42,079) 348,562 67 City of Pico Rivera (DR) 8,028 8,028
68 City of Rosemead (MB and DR) 80,365 80,365 69 City of Santa fe Springs (DR) 7,146 7,146 70 City of South Gate (DT and MB) 131,714 131,714 71 City of South Pasadena (DR) 11,401 11,401 72 City of West Covina (MB and DR) 109,850 109,850 73 City of West Hollywood (MB) 65,065 65,065 74 TOTAL VOLUNTARY NTD DATA REPORTING 5,647,455$ (353,376)$ 5,294,080$
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
15 PROPOSITION A 5% OF 40% DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS (Continued) (In Order of Priority)
PRIORITY VI: SPECIAL DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS Total Allocation 75 Avalon Ferry Subsidy 700,000$
76 Avalon Transit Services (Jitney and Dial-a-Ride) 300,000 77 Hollywood Bowl Shuttle Service 1,057,000
78 TOTAL SPECIAL DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS 2,057,000$
79 Total funds 14,193,407$
80 Reserves for contingencies (2) 7,941,633
81 TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 22,135,040$
82 Surplus (Deficit) -$
NOTES:
(1) Tier 2 Operators' share have been reduced by % of GOI Funding per Tier 2 Operators Funding Program. (2) These funds are held in reserve for future contingency purposes such as deficit years, growth over inflation, approved new or existing expanded paratransit services, and new NTD reporters.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
16 Population Population Proposition A Proposition C Measure R Measure M DOF Report as % of Local Return Local Return Local Return Local Return Article 8 2022 data (1) County Estimate (2) Estimate (2) Estimate (2) Estimate Population Allocation 1 AGOURA HILLS 19,771 0.2005% 571,403$ 473,964$ 355,473$ 402,869$ 23,137$ -$ 1,826,847$ 2 ALHAMBRA 81,834 0.8299% 2,365,091 1,961,781 1,471,335 1,667,513 95,745 7,561,465 3 ARCADIA 55,934 0.5672% 1,616,553 1,340,888 1,005,666 1,139,755 65,444 5,168,306 4 ARTESIA 16,226 0.1645% 468,949 388,981 291,736 330,634 18,990 1,499,289 5 AVALON 3,394 0.0344% 98,090 81,363 61,022 69,159 5,000 3,394 233,896 548,530 6 AZUSA 49,704 0.5040% 1,436,499 1,191,538 893,654 1,012,808 58,156 4,592,655 7 BALDWIN PARK 70,855 0.7185% 2,047,786 1,698,584 1,273,938 1,443,797 82,901 6,547,006 8 BELL 33,624 0.3410% 971,770 806,058 604,543 685,149 39,344 3,106,863 9 BELLFLOWER 77,359 0.7845% 2,235,758 1,854,503 1,390,877 1,576,327 90,510 7,147,975 10 BELL GARDENS 38,861 0.3941% 1,123,125 931,602 698,702 791,862 45,471 3,590,762 11 BEVERLY HILLS 32,265 0.3272% 932,493 773,479 580,109 657,457 37,754 2,981,292 12 BRADBURY 904 0.0092% 26,127 21,671 16,253 18,421 5,000 87,472 13 BURBANK 105,451 1.0694% 3,047,648 2,527,943 1,895,958 2,148,752 123,375 9,743,675 14 CALABASAS 22,926 0.2325% 662,586 549,598 412,198 467,158 26,828 2,118,368 15 CARSON 92,362 0.9366% 2,669,361 2,214,165 1,660,624 1,882,040 108,062 8,534,252 16 CERRITOS 48,634 0.4932% 1,405,575 1,165,887 874,416 991,004 56,904 4,493,787 17 CLAREMONT 37,072 0.3759% 1,071,421 888,715 666,536 755,408 43,378 3,425,458 18 COMMERCE 12,140 0.1231% 350,859 291,028 218,271 247,374 14,210 1,121,742 19 COMPTON 94,233 0.9556% 2,723,435 2,259,018 1,694,263 1,920,165 110,251 8,707,132 20 COVINA 50,449 0.5116% 1,458,030 1,209,398 907,048 1,027,988 59,027 4,661,492 21 CUDAHY 22,318 0.2263% 645,014 535,022 401,267 454,769 26,117 2,062,189 22 CULVER CITY 40,135 0.4070% 1,159,945 962,144 721,608 817,822 46,961 3,708,479 23 DIAMOND BAR 54,204 0.5497% 1,566,554 1,299,415 974,561 1,104,503 63,420 5,008,454 24 DOWNEY 112,584 1.1417% 3,253,799 2,698,941 2,024,205 2,294,099 131,719 10,402,764 25 DUARTE 21,258 0.2156% 614,379 509,611 382,208 433,170 24,877 1,964,245 26 EL MONTE 107,706 1.0922% 3,112,819 2,582,002 1,936,501 2,194,702 126,013 9,952,037 27 EL SEGUNDO 17,084 0.1732% 493,746 409,549 307,162 348,117 19,994 1,578,568 28 GARDENA 59,947 0.6079% 1,732,533 1,437,090 1,077,818 1,221,527 70,139 5,539,107 29 GLENDALE 193,116 1.9583% 5,581,261 4,629,509 3,472,132 3,935,082 225,934 17,843,917 30 GLENDORA 51,821 0.5255% 1,497,683 1,242,288 931,716 1,055,945 60,633 4,788,265 31 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 13,619 0.1381% 393,604 326,484 244,863 277,511 15,940 1,258,402 32 HAWTHORNE 86,841 0.8806% 2,509,798 2,081,812 1,561,359 1,769,540 101,603 8,024,112 33 HERMOSA BEACH 19,171 0.1944% 554,063 459,580 344,685 390,643 22,435 1,771,407 34 HIDDEN HILLS 1,738 0.0176% 50,230 41,665 31,248 35,415 5,000 163,558 35 HUNTINGTON PARK 53,942 0.5470% 1,558,982 1,293,134 969,851 1,099,164 63,114 4,984,246 TDA Article 8 (S & H)
TotalTDA Article 3
Ped & Bike (A)
PROPOSITION A, PROPOSITION C , MEASURE R and MEASURE M LOCAL RETURN, TDA ARTICLE 3 & 8
LOCAL JURISDICTION
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
17 Population Population Proposition A Proposition C Measure R Measure M DOF Report as % of Local Return Local Return Local Return Local Return Article 8 2022 data (1) County Estimate (2) Estimate (2) Estimate (2) Estimate Population Allocation TDA Article 3
Ped & Bike (A)
TDA Article 8 (S & H)
Total
PROPOSITION A, PROPOSITION C , MEASURE R and MEASURE M LOCAL RETURN, TDA ARTICLE 3 & 8 (continued)
LOCAL JURISDICTION
36 INDUSTRY (B) 438 0.0044% 12,659 10,500 7,875 8,925 - 39,959 37 INGLEWOOD 106,481 1.0798% 3,077,416 2,552,635 1,914,476 2,169,740 124,580 9,838,847 38 IRWINDALE 1,490 0.0151% 43,063 35,719 26,789 30,361 5,000 140,933 39 LA CANADA-FLINTRIDGE 20,081 0.2036% 580,363 481,395 361,047 409,186 23,500 1,855,491 40 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 5,594 0.0567% 161,673 134,103 100,577 113,988 6,551 516,892 41 LAKEWOOD 80,876 0.8201% 2,337,404 1,938,815 1,454,111 1,647,993 94,624 7,472,946 42 LA MIRADA 48,696 0.4938% 1,407,367 1,167,374 875,530 992,268 56,977 4,499,515 43 LANCASTER 175,164 1.7763% 5,062,428 4,199,151 3,149,363 3,569,278 204,932 175,164 12,071,326 28,256,479 44 LA PUENTE 37,587 0.3812% 1,086,305 901,061 675,796 765,902 43,980 3,473,044 45 LA VERNE 32,304 0.3276% 933,620 774,414 580,810 658,252 37,800 2,984,895 46 LAWNDALE 31,301 0.3174% 904,633 750,369 562,777 637,814 36,626 2,892,218 47 LOMITA 20,633 0.2092% 596,316 494,628 370,971 420,434 24,146 1,906,495 48 LONG BEACH 460,682 4.6717% 13,314,206 11,043,784 8,282,838 9,387,216 538,961 42,567,004 49 LOS ANGELES CITY 3,819,538 38.7329% 110,388,764 91,564,575 68,673,431 77,829,889 5,079,264 353,535,923 50 LYNWOOD 66,723 0.6766% 1,928,367 1,599,529 1,199,647 1,359,600 78,066 6,165,209 51 MALIBU 10,686 0.1084% 308,837 256,172 192,129 217,746 12,509 987,393 52 MANHATTAN BEACH 34,902 0.3539% 1,008,705 836,695 627,521 711,190 40,839 3,224,950 53 MAYWOOD 24,814 0.2516% 717,151 594,858 446,144 505,629 29,037 2,292,820 54 MONROVIA 37,563 0.3809% 1,085,611 900,486 675,364 765,413 43,952 3,470,827 55 MONTEBELLO 61,622 0.6249% 1,780,942 1,477,245 1,107,934 1,255,658 72,099 5,693,877 56 MONTEREY PARK 60,207 0.6105% 1,740,047 1,443,323 1,082,493 1,226,825 70,443 5,563,131 57 NORWALK 101,645 1.0308% 2,937,650 2,436,703 1,827,528 2,071,198 118,922 9,392,001 58 PALMDALE 167,398 1.6975% 4,837,983 4,012,979 3,009,734 3,411,032 195,847 167,398 11,536,136 27,003,711 59 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 12,980 0.1316% 375,136 311,165 233,374 264,491 15,192 1,199,358 60 PARAMOUNT 52,477 0.5322% 1,516,642 1,258,015 943,511 1,069,312 61,400 4,848,880 61 PASADENA 138,310 1.4026% 3,997,308 3,315,662 2,486,746 2,818,313 161,816 12,779,845 62 PICO RIVERA 61,442 0.6231% 1,775,740 1,472,930 1,104,697 1,251,990 71,888 5,677,245 63 POMONA 149,766 1.5187% 4,328,399 3,590,293 2,692,720 3,051,749 175,219 13,838,379 64 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 41,468 0.4205% 1,198,470 994,099 745,574 844,984 48,521 3,831,648 65 REDONDO BEACH 68,972 0.6994% 1,993,365 1,653,444 1,240,083 1,405,427 80,698 6,373,017 66 ROLLING HILLS 1,684 0.0171% 48,669 40,370 30,277 34,314 5,000 158,631 67 ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 8,289 0.0841% 239,561 198,710 149,032 168,903 9,704 765,910 68 ROSEMEAD 50,511 0.5122% 1,459,822 1,210,884 908,163 1,029,252 59,100 4,667,221 69 SAN DIMAS 34,352 0.3484% 992,810 823,510 617,632 699,983 40,196 3,174,130 70 SAN FERNANDO 23,519 0.2385% 679,724 563,814 422,860 479,242 27,522 2,173,162
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
18 Population Population Proposition A Proposition C Measure R Measure M DOF Report as % of Local Return Local Return Local Return Local Return Article 8 2022 data (1) County Estimate (2) Estimate (2) Estimate (2) Estimate Population Allocation TDA Article 3
Ped & Bike (A)
TDA Article 8 (S & H)
Total
PROPOSITION A, PROPOSITION C , MEASURE R and MEASURE M LOCAL RETURN, TDA ARTICLE 3 & 8 (continued)
LOCAL JURISDICTION
71 SAN GABRIEL 38,845 0.3939% 1,122,662 931,219 698,414 791,536 45,452 3,589,283 72 SAN MARINO 12,257 0.1243% 354,241 293,833 220,375 249,758 14,347 1,132,553 73 SANTA CLARITA 228,835 2.3206% 6,613,578 5,485,789 4,114,342 4,662,921 267,722 228,835 15,770,031 36,914,383 74 SANTA FE SPRINGS 18,763 0.1903% 542,271 449,799 337,350 382,330 21,958 1,733,707 75 SANTA MONICA 92,408 0.9371% 2,670,691 2,215,268 1,661,451 1,882,978 108,115 8,538,502 76 SIERRA MADRE 10,865 0.1102% 314,010 260,463 195,347 221,394 12,718 1,003,933 77 SIGNAL HILL 11,597 0.1176% 335,166 278,011 208,508 236,310 13,574 1,071,569 78 SOUTH EL MONTE 19,668 0.1994% 568,426 471,495 353,621 400,771 23,017 1,817,329 79 SOUTH GATE 93,259 0.9457% 2,695,286 2,235,668 1,676,751 1,900,318 109,111 8,617,135 80 SOUTH PASADENA 26,580 0.2695% 768,191 637,194 477,895 541,615 31,103 2,455,998 81 TEMPLE CITY 36,262 0.3677% 1,048,011 869,297 651,973 738,903 42,430 3,350,614 82 TORRANCE 144,433 1.4647% 4,174,269 3,462,447 2,596,835 2,943,080 168,980 13,345,610 83 VERNON 208 0.0021% 6,011 4,986 3,740 4,238 5,000 23,976 84 WALNUT 28,094 0.2849% 811,947 673,489 505,116 572,465 32,874 2,595,891 85 WEST COVINA 108,243 1.0977% 3,128,339 2,594,875 1,946,156 2,205,644 126,641 10,001,656 86 WEST HOLLYWOOD 35,399 0.3590% 1,023,069 848,609 636,457 721,318 41,420 3,270,873 87 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 8,043 0.0816% 232,451 192,812 144,609 163,890 9,417 743,180 88 WHITTIER 87,931 0.8917% 2,541,301 2,107,942 1,580,957 1,791,751 102,878 8,124,828 89 UNINCORP LA COUNTY 1,009,857 10.2407% 29,185,956 24,208,982 18,156,737 20,577,635 2,606,562 136,022 9,373,877 104,109,748 90 TOTAL 9,861,224 100.0000% 285,000,000$ 236,400,000$ 177,300,000$ 200,940,000$ 13,591,611$ 710,813 48,985,266$ 962,216,877$ NOTES:
(1) Population estimates are based on State of California Department of Finance's (DOF) 2022 population estimates. The Unincorporated Population figure for TDA Article 8 is based on 2007 estimates by Urban Research.
(B) City of Industry has opted out of the TDA Article 3 program indefinitely.
TDA Article 3 Allocation:
(2) Proposition A, Proposition C, Measure R and Measure M Local Return funds are allocated their share of estimated revenues (minus administration) without carryover since payments are made based on actual revenues received.
(A) 15% of the estimated revenue is first awarded to the City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County (30%-70% split) as Supplemental Allocation.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
Bus Transit Subsidies
FEDERAL FORMULA GRANTS
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
19 1 Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants:
Estimated Revenue 331,435,652$
2 Estimated Revenue 331,435,652$
Off the Top:
3 1% Enhancement Allocation (3,314,357)
4 328,121,295$
5 85% Formula Allocation 278,903,101$
Allocated to LTSS 5,000,000$
Allocated to Munis 273,903,101$
6 15% Discretionary Allocation 49,218,194
7 328,121,295$
Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Grants:
8 Estimated Revenue 25,881,610$
Section 5337 State of Good Repair (LA County Share of LA UZA 2):
High Intensity Fixed Guideway:
9 Directional Route Miles (DRM) Generated 50,886,648$
10 Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM) Generated 88,179,845
11 139,066,494$
High Intensity Motorbus:
12 Directional Route Miles (DRM) Generated 3,974,166$
13 Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM) Generated 4,956,877
14 8,931,044$
15 Section 5337 State of Good Repair Total Estimated Revenue 147,997,538$ 16 Total Federal Formula Funds Available 505,314,800$
Note:
(2) Fund allocations are based on FY22 TPM data.
FEDERAL FORMULA GRANTS REVENUE ESTIMATES (1),(2)
Los Angeles County Share of Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim UZA (1) Funding based on assumption of full Congressional authorization of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
20 Allocation Fund Exchanges
Adjusted
Allocation Allocation Fund Exchange
Adjusted
Allocation Allocation Fund Exchange
Adjusted
Allocation
Included Operators:
1 Metro Bus Operations 206,440,929$ (15,869,320)$ 190,571,610$ 16,694,895$ 9,186,715$ 25,881,610$ 140,954,933$ 7,042,605$ 147,997,538$ 364,450,758$ Municipal Operators:
2 Arcadia 500,180 47,263 547,443 47,263 (47,263) - - - - 547,443 3 Claremont 61,454 5,807 67,261 5,807 (5,807) - - - - 67,261 4 Commerce 2,588,764 95,686 2,684,450 95,686 (95,686) - - - - 2,684,450 5 Culver City 3,865,922 365,298 4,231,220 365,298 (365,298) - - - - 4,231,220 6 Foothill Transit 35,365,884 7,412,526 42,778,409 2,550,085 (2,550,085) - 4,862,441 (4,862,441) - 42,778,409 7 Gardena 3,951,808 304,921 4,256,730 304,921 (304,921) - - - - 4,256,730 8 La Mirada 198,162 18,725 216,886 18,725 (18,725) - - - - 216,886 9 Long Beach 24,188,208 1,736,049 25,924,258 1,854,706 (1,854,706) - 241,344 (241,344) - 25,924,258 10 Montebello 5,440,349 514,069 5,954,417 514,069 (514,069) - - - - 5,954,417 11 Norwalk 9,289,234 188,540 9,477,774 188,540 (188,540) - - - - 9,477,774 12 Redondo Beach 904,481 85,466 989,947 85,466 (85,466) - - - - 989,947 13 Santa Monica 16,486,987 1,366,255 17,853,242 1,264,336 (1,264,336) - 101,919 (101,919) - 17,853,242 14 Torrance 3,725,967 352,073 4,078,040 352,073 (352,073) - - - - 4,078,040 15 Sub-Total 106,567,401 12,492,677 119,060,078 7,646,974 (7,646,974) - 5,205,703 (5,205,703) - 119,060,078 Eligible Operators:
16 Antelope Valley 331,959 818,369 1,150,328 31,367 (31,367) - 787,002 (787,002) - 1,150,328 17 LADOT 15,725,088 2,334,302 18,059,390 1,284,402 (1,284,402) - 1,049,900 (1,049,900) - 18,059,390 18 Santa Clarita 2,370,276 223,972 2,594,248 223,972 (223,972) - - - - 2,594,248 19 Foothill BSCP - - - - - - - - - - 20 Sub-Total 18,427,322 3,376,642 21,803,965 1,539,741 (1,539,741) 1,836,901 (1,836,901) - 21,803,965 26 LTSS ZEV CFP
21 Total Excluding Metro 124,994,723 15,869,320 140,864,043 9,186,715 (9,186,715) - 7,042,605 (7,042,605) - 140,864,043 22 Grand Total 331,435,652$ -$ 331,435,652$ 25,881,610$ -$ 25,881,610$ 147,997,538$ -$ 147,997,538$ 505,314,800$ Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.
(1)Allocations are based on FY22 statistics.
Fiscal Year 2024
FEDERAL FORMULA GRANTS (Estimated - to be Adjusted to Actual apportionment) (1) Urbanized Formula Program (Section 5307) Bus & Bus Facilities (Section 5339) State of Good Repair (Section 5337) Total Operators
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
21 LTSS Fund
Exchange
Project Title $ Amount Project Title $ Amount
1 Antelope Valley 0.1212% 331,959$ 331,959$ 818,369$ 1,150,328$ 2 Arcadia 0.1826% 500,180 500,180 47,263 547,443 3 Claremont 0.0224% 61,454 61,454 5,807 67,261 4 Commerce 0.3697% 1,012,633 Two (2) Battery Electric Replacement Buses
1,456,131
WAYSINE DEPLOYMENT
120,000 2,588,764 95,686 2,684,450 5 6
Foothill Transit 9.8529% 26,987,351 24 Zero-Emission Double Deck Buses
8,378,532 35,365,884 7,412,526 42,778,409 7 Gardena 1.1781% 3,226,959
Electric Charging Station Project-
Expanded Electrification: Solar
Generation Equipment and Energy
Storage System
564,849
Bus Stop Amenities Project
160,000 3,951,808 304,921 4,256,730 8 LADOT 4.9626% 13,592,729 Downtown Yard Installation of Electric Bus Chargers 2,132,359 15,725,088 2,334,302 18,059,390 9 La Mirada 0.0723% 198,162 198,162 18,725 216,886 Long Beach Transit Facilities
Modernization Program
3,500,000
Bus Stop Improvements
10 11 Montebello 1.9862% 5,440,349 5,440,349 514,069 5,954,417 12 Metro Bus Operations (3) 64.5049% 176,680,799 5,000,000 Division 18 (Carson) Charging Infrastructure Project
24,760,130 206,440,929 360,000(2) (16,229,320) 190,571,610 13 14 Redondo Beach 0.3302% 904,481 904,481 85,466 989,947 15 Santa Clarita 0.8654% 2,370,276 2,370,276 223,972 2,594,248 Santa Monica 4.8851% 13,380,371 Replacement of 40-foot Buses 2,946,616 Real-Time Arrival Signs 160,000 16,486,987 1,366,255 17,853,242 16 Torrance 1.3603% 3,725,967 3,725,967 352,073 4,078,040 17 TOTAL 100.0000% 273,903,101$ 5,000,000$ 49,880,259$ 2,652,292$ 331,435,652$ -$ -$ 331,435,652$ Notes: Total may not add due to rounding.
(3) Due to the Infrastructure Investment Jobs Act (IIJA) leading to greater-than-expected 5307 grants, the Board approved in June 2022 to allocate $10 million in FY22, $5 million in FY24, and $5 million in FY26 from 5307 to the LTSS. Metro will exchange these amounts with its PC40 fund. In FY24, $5 million will be included in Metro's 5307 fund to cover FY24 fund exchange. 24,188,208
1,512,292 9,289,234
(1) Operators’ share of Section 5337 and 5339 will be exchanged with Metro’s share of Section 5307 allocation.
Norwalk 0.7285% 1,995,300
Long Beach Transit 7.1661%
Replacement of 14 CNG Buses 5,781,642
19,628,208 SCRTTC/Southern California
Regional Transit Training
Consortium
360,000
Culver City 1.4114% 3,865,922
Total Funds
AvailableOPERATOR
FEDERAL SECTION 5307 CAPITAL ALLOCATION
15% DISCRETIONARY ALLOCATION
188,540 9,477,774
4,231,220 3,865,922 365,298
25,924,258 (2) (360,000) 2,096,049
Bus Stop Equity Project
700,000
(2) Second year of fund allocations to the Southern California Regional Transit Training Consortium (SCRTTC) through Long Beach Transit. Funds to the SCRTTC will be exchanged with Metro's TDA share.
LA UZA 2
NET
FORMULA
SHARE
85%
FORMULA
ALLOCATION
1% ENHANCEMENT ALLOCATION
(Estimated - to be Adjusted to Actual apportionment)
TOTAL TDA Fund
Exchange
S5339/S5337
Fund Exchange
(1)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
22 DRM DRM% DRM
$Allocation VRM VRM% VRM $Allocation
High Intensity Fixed Guideway:
1 Metro (Including Metrolink) 485.4 99.774% $ 50,771,591 27,684,200 98.806% $ 87,126,703 $ 137,898,294 $ 1,168,201 $ 139,066,495 2 Long Beach Transit 0.5 0.103% 52,299 60,068 0.214% 189,044 241,344 (241,344) - 3 Santa Monica 0.6 0.123% 62,758 12,443 0.044% 39,160 101,919 (101,919) - 4 Foothill Transit - 0.000% - 262,121 0.936% 824,938 824,939 (824,939) - 5 Sub-total 486.5 100.000% 50,886,648 28,018,832 100.000% 88,179,845 139,066,495 - 139,066,495 High Intensity Motorbus:
6 Antelope Valley 23.6 13.825% 549,445 116,374 4.792% 237,556 787,002 (787,002) - 7 Foothill Transit 39.4 23.081% 917,294 1,528,527 62.947% 3,120,208 4,037,503 (4,037,503) - 8 LADOT 35.1 20.562% 817,183 114,003 4.695% 232,716 1,049,900 (1,049,900) - 9 Metro Bus Operations 72.6 42.531% 1,690,243 669,370 27.566% 1,366,396 3,056,639 5,874,404 8,931,043 10 Sub-total 170.7 100.00% 3,974,166 2,428,274 100.000% 4,956,877 8,931,043 - 8,931,043 11 Total LA County Share - UZA 2 657.20 54,860,814$ 30,447,106 200.000% 93,136,722$ 147,997,538$ -$ 147,997,538$ Note:
(1) Operators’ share of Section 5337 will be exchanged with Metro’s share of Section 5307 allocation.
Directional Route Miles (DRM)
Allocation
Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM)
Allocation
FEDERAL SECTION 5337 - STATE OF GOOD REPAIR
Total $
Allocation Fund Exchange Net Funds
Available (1)
(Estimated - to be Adjusted to Actual apportionment)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHARE
(UZA 2)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
23 OPERATOR LA UZA 2 NET
FORMULA SHARE
Net Formula
Share Fund Exchange Net Funds Available
(1)
1 Antelope Valley 0.1212% 31,367$ (31,367)$ -$ 2 Arcadia 0.1826% 47,263 (47,263) - 3 Claremont 0.0224% 5,807 (5,807) - 4 Commerce 0.3697% 95,686 (95,686) - 5 Culver City 1.4114% 365,298 (365,298) - 6 Foothill Transit 9.8529% 2,550,085 (2,550,085) - 7 Gardena 1.1781% 304,921 (304,921) - 8 LADOT 4.9626% 1,284,402 (1,284,402) -
9 La Mirada 0.0723% 18,725 (18,725) - 10 Long Beach 7.1661% 1,854,706 (1,854,706) - 11 Montebello 1.9862% 514,069 (514,069) - 12 Metro Bus Operations 64.5049% 16,694,895 9,186,715 25,881,610 13 Norwalk 0.7285% 188,540 (188,540) - 14 Redondo Beach 0.3302% 85,466 (85,466) - 15 Santa Clarita 0.8654% 223,972 (223,972) - 16 Santa Monica 4.8851% 1,264,336 (1,264,336) - 17 Torrance 1.3603% 352,073 (352,073) - 18 TOTAL 100.0000% 25,881,610$ -$ 25,881,610$ Note:
(1) Operators’ share of Section 5339 will be exchanged with Metro’s share of Section 5307 allocation.
FEDERAL SECTION 5339 - BUS AND BUS CAPITAL ALLOCATION
(Estimated - to be Adjusted to Actual apportionment)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
24 Local Vehicle
Miles
[Input]
Express Vehicle
Miles
[Input]
Total Miles
Weighted 60%
Local/ 40%
Express
1/3 Weight
Active
Fleet (1)
[Input]
Peak Bus
Fixed
Route (2)
[Input]
Allowable
Peak Bus
(Peak+20%)
DAR
Seats (3)
[Input]
Bus Eqvt.
(44 Seats
per Bus)
Total Active
Vehicle 1/3 Weight
1 Antelope Valley 2,628,918 832,701 1,910,431 0.9081% 62 52 62.0 0 0.0 62.0 0.6510% 2 Arcadia DR 71,270 - 42,762 0.0203% 0 0 0.0 86 2.0 2.0 0.0205% 3 Arcadia MB 191,716 - 115,030 0.0547% 8 6 7.2 0 0.0 7.2 0.0756% 4 Claremont 27,529 - 16,517 0.0079% 0 0 0.0 50 1.1 1.1 0.0119% 5 Commerce 452,573 - 271,544 0.1291% 22 13 15.6 48 1.1 16.7 0.1752% 6 Culver City 1,446,527 - 867,916 0.4125% 54 34 40.8 0 0.0 40.8 0.4284% 7 Foothill Transit 11,136,880 3,884,492 8,235,925 3.9147% 359 303 359.0 0 0.0 359.0 3.7693% 8 Gardena 1,178,632 - 707,179 0.3361% 52 24 28.8 55 1.3 30.1 0.3155% 9 LADOT 4,358,583 3,137,834 3,870,283 1.8396% 242 183 219.6 0 0.0 219.6 2.3057% 10 La Mirada 56,747 - 34,048 0.0162% 0 0 0.0 192 4.4 4.4 0.0458% 11 Long Beach 6,586,801 - 3,952,081 1.8785% 259 144 172.8 40 0.9 173.7 1.8239% 12 Montebello 1,835,718 30,753 1,113,732 0.5294% 71 47 56.4 40 0.9 57.3 0.6017% 13 Metro Bus Operations 69,539,185 3,517,924 43,130,681 20.5010% 2,360 1,558 1,869.6 0 0.0 1,869.6 19.6299% 14 Norwalk 1,036,738 - 622,043 0.2957% 34 24 28.8 0 0.0 28.8 0.3024% 15 Redondo Beach 473,836 - 284,302 0.1351% 14 14 14.0 75 1.7 15.7 0.1649% 16 Santa Clarita 1,834,350 735,839 1,394,946 0.6631% 83 66 79.2 0 0.0 79.2 0.8316% 17 Santa Monica 4,435,473 50,531 2,681,496 1.2746% 195 124 148.8 0 0.0 148.8 1.5623% 18 Torrance 1,162,536 448,103 876,763 0.4167% 63 48 57.6 54 1.2 58.8 0.6177% 19 TOTAL 108,454,012 12,638,177 70,127,678 33.3333% 3,878 2,640 3,160.2 640 14.5 3,174.7 33.3333% Notes:
Include only MTA Funded Programs:
(1) Source: NTD Report Form A-30 "Vehicle Inventory Report (Mode MB), Number of Active Vehicles in Fleet". LADOT's total active vehicles is reported separately. (2) Source: NTD Report Form S-10 "Service Non-Rail (Mode MB), Vehicles Operated in Annual Maximum Service". LADOT's figure is from TPM excluding Community Dash. (3) Source: NTD Report Form A-30 "Vehicle Inventory Report (Mode DR), Seating Capacity". Redondo Beach's Seating Capacity is apportioned between FAP and non-FAP vehicles.
CAPITAL ALLOCATION % SHARE CALCULATION
MILEAGE CALCULATION (FY22 data)
OPERATOR
ACTIVE FLEET CALCULATION (FY22 data)
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority FY 2024 Transit Fund Allocation
25 FARE UNITS (FY22 data)
Passenger Revenue
[Input]
Base
Fare $
[Input]
Fare Units 1/2 of 1/3
Weight
Unlinked
Passengers
[Input]
1/2 of 1/3
Weight
1 Antelope Valley $1,850,053 1.50$ 1,233,369 0.4038% 1,113,754 0.0747% 2.0375% -1.9163% 0.1212% 2 Arcadia DR 4,138 1.00 4,138 0.0014% 15,445 0.0010% 0.0432% 0.0014% 0.0446% 3 Arcadia MB 2,620 0.50 5,240 0.0017% 24,471 0.0016% 0.1336% 0.0043% 0.1380% 4 Claremont 10,742 2.50 4,297 0.0014% 8,078 0.0005% 0.0217% 0.0007% 0.0224% 5 Commerce (1) - - 113,692 0.0372% 246,643 0.0165% 0.3581% 0.0116% 0.3697% 6 Culver City 1,142,579 1.00 1,142,579 0.3740% 2,267,843 0.1521% 1.3670% 0.0444% 1.4114% 7 Foothill Transit 7,480,849 1.75 4,274,771 1.3994% 6,852,419 0.4595% 9.5429% 0.3100% 9.8529% 8 Gardena 1,167,450 1.00 1,167,450 0.3822% 1,599,539 0.1073% 1.1411% 0.0371% 1.1781% 9 LADOT 911,373 1.50 607,582 0.1989% 6,893,870 0.4622% 4.8065% 0.1561% 4.9626% 10 La Mirada 19,606 1.00 19,606 0.0064% 24,653 0.0017% 0.0701% 0.0023% 0.0723% 11 Long Beach 6,958,816 1.10 6,326,196 2.0709% 17,409,861 1.1674% 6.9407% 0.2255% 7.1661% 12 Montebello 2,068,909 1.10 1,880,826 0.6157% 2,638,870 0.1769% 1.9237% 0.0625% 1.9862% 13 Metro Bus Operations 48,425,637 1.75 27,671,793 9.0585% 198,145,246 13.2860% 62.4754% 2.0294% 64.5049% 14 Norwalk 208,328 1.25 166,662 0.0546% 789,462 0.0529% 0.7056% 0.0229% 0.7285% 15 Redondo Beach - 1.00 0 0.0000% 295,365 0.0198% 0.3198% 0.0104% 0.3302% 16 Santa Clarita 1,367,016 1.00 1,367,016 0.4475% 1,820,768 0.1221% 2.0642% -1.1988% 0.8654% 17 Santa Monica 5,617,870 1.25 4,494,296 1.4712% 6,312,168 0.4232% 4.7314% 0.1537% 4.8851% 18 Torrance 433,500 1.00 433,500 0.1419% 2,106,014 0.1412% 1.3175% 0.0428% 1.3603% 19 TOTAL $77,669,486 50,913,013 16.6667% 248,564,469 16.6667% 100.0000% 0.0000% 100.0000% Note:
Passenger
Miles %
Re-Allocated
Share
Passenger
Miles %
Re-Allocated
Share
20 Non-LA 2 UZA (AV 123 for AVTA, AV 176 for Santa Clarita) 28,383,366 94.0517% 1.9163% 11,404,989 58.0772% 1.1988% 21 UZA number LA 2 1,795,116 5.9483% 0.1212% 8,232,648 41.9228% 0.8654% 22 Total 30,178,482 100.0000% 2.0375% 19,637,637 100.0000% 2.0642% (1) Commerce Fare Units are calculated as follows: ((Total Fare Units w/out MTA and Commerce) / (Total Unlinked Passengers w/out MTA and Commerce)) * Commerce Unlinked Passengers.
SANTA CLARITA (FY19 data)ANTELOPE VALLEY (FY19 data)
FORM FFA10, SECTION 9 STATISTICS PASSENGER MILES IS USED TO CALCULATE AVTA AND SANTA CLARITA'S RE-ALLOCATION OF CAPITAL MONIES.
OPERATOR
UNLINKED PASSENGERS (FY22
data)
Gross Formula
Share
CAPITAL ALLOCATION % SHARE CALCULATION (Continued)
Re-Allocate
AVTA And
Santa Clarita's
Non-LA2 UZA
Share
LA UZA 2 Net
Formula Share
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CLAIM
STANDARD ASSURANCES FOR APPLICANTS
FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS (LTF) AND
STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS (STAF)
Claimant: Fiscal Year:
PLEASE INITIAL ALL APPLICABLE PARAGRAPHS PURSUANT TO WHICH THE CLAIM IS BEING SUBMITTED.
MTA
TDA
GUIDE
SECTION Initial
1. CERTIFIED FISCAL AND COMPLIANCE AUDIT
C
laimant certifies that it has submitted a
1.8.1 satisfactory, independent fiscal and compliance
1.8.3 audit, with required certification statement, to SCAG, MTA, and the Department of Transportation, pursuant to PUC Section 99245 and CAC Section 6664 for the prior fiscal year (project year minus two).
Claimant assures that this audit requirement will be completed for the current fiscal year (project year minus one), and submitted to MTA no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.
2. 90-DAY ANNUAL REPORT (STATE CONTROLLER'S REPORT)
Cl
aimant certifies that it has submitted a State Controller's Report
1.8.2 in conformance with the Uniform System of Accounts and Records,
1.8.3 to SCAG, MTA, and the State Controller, pursuant to PUC Section 99243, for the prior year (project year minus two). Claimant assures that this report will be completed for the current fiscal year (project year minus one), and submitted no later than 90 days after the close of the fiscal year.
3. PART-TIME EMPLOYEES*
C
laimant certifies that it is not precluded, by any contract entered
5.6.2b into on or after June 28, 1979, from employing part-time drivers or contracting with common carriers of persons operating under a franchise or license. Claimant further certifies that no person who was a full-time employee on June 28, 1979, shall have his or her employment, excluding overtime, reduced as a result of it employing part-time drivers or contracting with those common carriers. (PUC Section 99314.5c)
ATTACHMENT B
STANDARD ASSURANCES FOR APPLICANTS
MTA
TDA
GUIDE
SECTION Initial
4. FIFTY PERCENT EXPENDITURE LIMITATION
Claimant filing a claim pursuant to PUC Section 99268.1 certifies
2.2.1 that it was in compliance with PUC Section 99268 during the 1978-79 fiscal year, and further certifies that it will remain in compliance with that section during the project year.
5. REVENUE RATIOS FOR OLDER OPERATORS
Claimant filing a claim pursuant to PUC Section 99268.2
2.2.2 certifies that it will maintain for the project year that ratio of fare revenues and local support to operating cost which was maintained during the 1978-79 fiscal year, and further assures for the project year that it reasonably anticipates achieving the ratio of fare revenues to operating cost at least equal to the ratio maintained in FY 1978-79, or (a) 20 percent if serving an urbanized area, and (b) 10 percent if serving a nonurbanized area, whichever is greater.
6. REVENUE RATIOS FOR NEWER URBANIZED AREA OPERATORS
Claimant filing a claim pursuant to PUC Section 99268.3 certifies
2.2.2 that it will maintain for the project year at least that ratio of fare revenues and local support to operating cost which was maintained during FY 1978-79 if that ratio was greater than 20 percent; claimant further assures, for the project year, that it reasonably anticipates achieving a ratio of fare revenues to operating cost equal to or greater than 20 percent for the project year.
7. REVENUE RATIOS FOR NEWER NON-URBANIZED AREA
OPERATORS
2.2.2 Claimant filing a claim pursuant to PUC Section 99268.4 certifies that it will maintain for the project year at least that ratio of fare revenues and local support to operating cost which was maintained during FY 1978-79 if that ratio was greater than 10 percent; claimant further assures, for the project year, that it reasonably anticipates achieving a ratio of fare revenues to operating cost equal to or greater than 10 percent.
8a. REVENUE RATIOS FOR EXCLUSIVE SERVICES TO
ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED
2.2.3 Claimant filing a claim pursuant to PUC Section 99268.5 certifies that, for the purpose of the claim, it provides services using vehicles for the exclusive use of elderly and handicapped persons.
STANDARD ASSURANCES FOR APPLICANTS
MTA
TDA
GUIDE
SECTION Initial
8b. REVENUE RATIOS FOR PARATRANSIT SERVICES
Claimant filing a claim pursuant to PUC Section
2.2.3 99275.5c (Article 4.5) further certifies that, for the project year, it reasonably anticipates achieving the performance criteria, local match requirements, or fare recovery ratios adopted by MTA.
9. EXTENSION OF SERVICE
Claimant that received an allocation of Local Transportation
1.8.4 Funds for an extension of service pursuant to PUC Section 99268.8
2.2.5 certifies that it will file a report of these services pursuant to CAC Section 6633.8b within 90 days after the close of the fiscal year in which that allocation was granted.
10. RETIREMENT SERVICE
Claimant filing a claim pursuant to PUC Section 99260 certifies
2.1.7 that: (a) the current cost of its retirement system is fully funded with respect to the officers and employees of its public transportation system; or (b) the operator is implementing a plan approved by the transportation planning agency which will fully fund the retirement system for such officers and employees within 40 years; or (c) the operator has a private pension plan which sets aside and invests, or on a current basis, funds sufficient to provide for the payment of future benefits, and which is fully compliant with the requirements stated in PUC Sections 99272 and 99273.
11a. USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS
Claimant filing a claim for TDA funds for capital intensive projects
2.2.1 pursuant to PUC Sec. 99268.7 certifies that it has made every
2.2.8 effort to obtain federal funding for any project which is funded pursuant to PUC Sec. 99268.7.
11b. Claimant qualifying for funds pursuant to PUC Sec. 99268.1 and filing a claim for TDA funds in excess of the amount allowed
2.2.1d under PUC Sec. 99268 certifies that such funds are required in order to obtain maximum federal operating funds in the year such funds are claimed, pursuant to PUC Sec. 99267.5 and CAC Sec. 6633.1.
STANDARD ASSURANCES FOR APPLICANTS
MTA
TDA
GUIDE
SECTION Initial
12. CHP CERTIFICATION
Claimant filing a claim for Local Transportation Funds has included
2.2.9 in the claim a certification completed within the last 13 months by the California Highway Patrol indicating compliance with Vehicle Code Section 1808.1, indicating that the operator has participated in a "pull notice system" to examine driver's records, as specified in PUC Sec. 99251.
13. STA EFFICIENCY STANDARDS*
Beginning in FY 1992, claimant filing a claim for State Transit Assistance Funds for operating purposes certifies that it has met the efficiency standards which limit cost per hour increases, pursuant to PUC Sec. 99314.6.
14. REDUCED TRANSIT FARES
Claimants of TDA funds who offer reduced fares to senior citizens certify that: (a) The Federal Medicare Identification Card is sufficient identification to receive senior citizen reduced fares if such fares are available; and (b) A disabled person or disabled veteran identification card issued pursuant to subdivision (d) of Vehicle Code Sections 22511.5 or 22511.9 (whichever is applicable) is sufficient identification to receive disabled person reduced fares if such reduced fares are available.
*STAP Claimants Only.
(Legal Name of Applicant/Claimant)
(Authorizing Signature)
(Print Name & Title)
CLAIM FORM
TDA CLAIM FORM
LTF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION - ARTICLE 4
CLAIMANT:
CONTACT PERSON: TELEPHONE:
DATE: FISCAL YEAR: COUNTY STAFF: Los Angeles
PAYMENT RECIPIENT:
ADDRESS:
ATTENTION:
(Name and Title)
PURPOSE REQUESTED PAYMENT AND RESERVES AMOUNT
Article 4 1. Payment from FY Allocation -
PUC 99260(a) Operations $__________________
2. Amount placed in Capital Reserve from
current year allocation (Complete
Table 2) $__________________
3. Total FY 2023 funding mark (1+2) $__________________
Authorized Signature:
(Claimant's Chief Administrator or Finance Officer)
(Print name and title)
CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
Approval of this claim and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to funds being available and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth by this claim.
CLAIM FORM
STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND
Pursuant to Sections 6730-6735 of the California Administrative Code
CLAIMANT:
CONTACT PERSON: TELEPHONE:
DATE: FISCAL YEAR: COUNTY LTF: Los Angeles
ADDRESS:
ATTENTION:
(Name and Title)
PURPOSE REQUESTED PAYMENT AND RESERVES AMOUNT
( ) CAC, Section 6730 (a) 1. Payment from Unallocated- Operations $___________________
( ) CAC, Section 6730 (b)
( ) CAC, Section 6730 (c) 2. Amount placed in Capital
( ) CAC, Section 6731 (a) Reserve from current year
( ) CAC, Section 6731 (b) allocation (Complete Table 2) $___________________ ( ) CAC, Section 6731 (c)
3. SB1 SGR Funds (Complete Table 2) $__________________
4. Total FY 2023 Fund Mark (1+2+3) $___________________
Authorized Signature:
(Claimant's Chief Administrator or Finance Officer)
(Print name and title)
CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
Approval of this claim and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to monies being available and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth by this claim and SCAG Allocation Instructions.
Table L-1 (A)
HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED FINANCIAL STATUS
SOURCE AND APPLICATION OF CAPITAL FUNDS
BY YEAR OF EX PENDITURE ($ 0 0 0 )
M ODE:
SOURCE OF CAPITAL FUNDS: 20 21 20 22 20 23
Audited Actual Planned
FEDERAL CAPITAL GRANTS
FTA Sec. 5309 (Sec. 3)
FAU Grant s
FTA Sec. 5307(Sec. 9)
Other Federal (Assume 80/20 match) (Specify source)
STATE CAPITAL GRANTS AND SUBVENTIONS
TDA (ART 4) current from unallocated
TDA from prior years reserves
TDA (ART 8)
STA current from unallocated
STA from prior years reserve
SB1 SGR
Other State (Specify)
LOCAL CAPITAL GRANTS
System Generated
General Fund
Prop. A Local Return
Prop. A Discretionary Carry Over
Prop. C Discretionary
Prop. C Local Return
Prop. C 5% Security
Measure R Clean Fuel Bus Capital
Measure R 15% Local Return
Prop 1 B PTM ISEA Bridge Funds
Prop 1B Transit Security Bridge Funds
Other Local (Specify)
TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUE
TOTAL CAPITAL EX PENSES
Table L-1 (B)
HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED FINANCIAL STATUS
SOURCE AND APPLICATION OF OPERATING FUNDS
BY YEAR OF EX PENDITURE ($ 0 0 0 )
SOURCE OF OPERATING FUNDS: 2021 2022 2023
Audited Actual Planned
FEDERAL CASH GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS
FTA Sec. 5307 (Sec. 9) Operating
CMAQ (Operating)
STATE CASH GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS
TDA Current from unallocated
STA Current from unallocated
Other State (Specify)
LOCAL CASH GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS
Passenger Fares
Special Transit Service
Charter Service Revenues
Auxiliary Transportation Revenues
Non-transportation Revenues
Prop. A %40 Discretionary
Prop. A %25 Local Return
Prop. A Incentive fund
Prop. A Interest
BSIP
TSE
Base
MOSIP
Prop. C %40 Discretionary
Prop. C %20 Local Return
Prop. C %5 Security
Prop. C Other (Interest)
Other Local (Specify)
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
TABLE 2
TDA
Total Capital Funds Reserved
for Future Payment (Total A & B):$___________________
(A) ( B )
PROJECT ANTICIPATED ANTICIPATED
DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE EXPENDITURE
FY 2024 FUTURE YEARS
TABLE 2(B)
STA
Total Capital Funds Reserved
for Future Payment: $_________________________________
PROJECT ( A ) ( B )
ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURE
DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE FUTURE YEARS
FY 2024
ATTACHMENT C
RESOLUTION NO. 23-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MONTEBELLO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF
FINANCE TO SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM FOR FUNDING PROVIDED BY
THE STATE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS FOR
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS AND STATE TRANSIT
ASSISTANCE FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Montebello (“City”), by and through the Montebello Bus Lines (“MBL” or the “Transportation Department”), is committed to providing productive and quality service on all of its transit routes; and
WHEREAS, the Transportation Development Act of 1971 provides for a significant source of funding for public transportation in the Local Transportation Fund (LTF); and WHEREAS, MBL is eligible to claim these funds pursuant to Article 4, Section 99260(a) of the Public Utilities Code; and
WHEREAS, the State Transit Assistance Fund (STA) provides a source of funding for public transportation from the Transportation Development Act of 1971 (TDA); and WHEREAS, MBL is eligible to claim these STA funds pursuant to Article 4, Section 6730(a) and (b) of the California Code of Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) requires an annual claim to be submitted by local agencies in order to allocate these funds; and
WHEREAS, the City’s portion of the LTF funds allocated for MBL use is $13,454,796 for Fiscal Year 2023-2024; and
WHEREAS, the City’s portion of the STA funds allocated for MBL to use is $1,698,456.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO HEREBY RESOLVES, FINDS, AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:
THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE, AS THE CITY’S CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, IS
GRANTED THE AUTHORITY TO SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM UNDER THE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS AND THE STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND.
RESOLUTION NO. 23-64
SECTION 1. APPROVALS AND CERTIFICATIONS
1. That these LFT and STA funds shall be used to assist the City of Montebello’s Transportation Department in its ongoing operations and continuance to provide the most efficient service.
SECTION 2.That the City’s Director of Transportation, or his/her designee, is authorized to furnish Metro with the required claim forms and take any additional action(s) necessary to effectuate the purpose of this Resolution.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and that the same shall be in full force and effect.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023.
_______________________________
David N. Torres, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ ________________________________ Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:
CITY OF MONTEBELLO )
I, Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk of the City of Montebello, County of Los Angeles, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 23-64 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Montebello, signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 13 th day of September 2023 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
RESOLUTION NO. 23-64
The undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Montebello, does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true, full and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of said City which was duly convened and held on the date stated thereon, and that said document has not been amended, modified, repealed or rescinded since its date of adoption and is in full force and effect as of the date hereof.
DATE:
Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk
ITEM # 19
PAYMENT OF BILLS: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 23-67 APPROVING THE CITY WARRANT REGISTER OF DEMANDS DATED SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. 23-67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO
APPROVING AND ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO HEREBY RESOLVES, FINDS, AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the reference is hereby made to that certain Register of Audited Demand No.1558, consisting of 7 pages, and including:
Warrant No.
General: Check No. 600859 through 601003
ACH No. 4788 through 4855
Successor Agency: Check No. 1507 through 1507
On file in the office of the City Clerk, the same having been audited and approved by the Assistant Director of Finance as required by law.
SECTION 2. That the said City Council having examined each such demand does hereby approve and direct the payment of same, as set forth in said Register, except the following Warrant No.
______________________________
______________________________
______________________________
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and that the same shall be in full force and effect.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of September 2023.
_______________________________
David N. Torres, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________ ________________________________ Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez -Glasman, City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 23-67
• Exhibit A – Warrant Register
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:
CITY OF MONTEBELLO )
I, Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk of the City of Montebello, County of Los Angeles, State of California, hereby certify that th e foregoing Resolution No. 23-67 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Montebello, signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk at a regular meet ing of said Council held on the 13th day of September 2023 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
The undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Montebello, does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true, full, and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of said City which was duly convened and held on the date stated thereon, and that said document has not been amended, modified, repealed or rescinded since its date of adoption and is in full force and effect as of the date hereof.
DATE: __
Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
WARRANT# DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VEND
OR #
VENDOR NAME
General Account
4788 08/17/2023 $1,745.87 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4789 08/17/2023 $5,249.73 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4790 08/17/2023 $1,412.37 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4791 08/17/2023 $726.42 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4792 08/17/2023 $575.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4793 08/17/2023 $1,951.73 UNIFORM EXPENSE 20350 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 4794 08/17/2023 $75,181.88 CONTRACT SERVICES 16120 ALVAREZ-GLASMAN & COLVIN 4795 08/17/2023 $7,375.34 SUPPLIES 2586 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 4796 08/17/2023 $1,455.30 SUPPLIES 62880 AMERICAN MARKER 4797 08/17/2023 $5,554.81 CONTRACT SERVICES 2102 JOHN P BEROKOFF 4798 08/17/2023 $425.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 2889 COMLOCK SECURITY GROUP INC 4799 08/17/2023 $5,194.06 FUEL 962 MO DION & SONS INC
4800 08/17/2023 $96.28 SUPPLIES 3108 MARIO ESPINOSA
4801 08/17/2023 $6,333.10 LEASE PAYMENT 74920 EXECUTIVE CAR LEASING COMPANY 4802 08/17/2023 $34.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 23660 DAIOHS USA 4803 08/17/2023 $10,609.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3169 FOOTHOLD TECHNOLOGY INC 4804 08/17/2023 $652.40 SUPPLIES 2811 LIGHT BULB DEPOT 38 LLC 4805 08/17/2023 $424.38 CONTRACT SERVICES 57140 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SOUTHERN CA 4806 08/17/2023 $882.44 SUPPLIES 3066 V & V MANUFACTURING INC 4807 08/24/2023 $3,375.90 TRAINING 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4808 08/24/2023 $134.42 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4809 08/24/2023 $984.87 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4810 08/24/2023 $466.07 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4811 08/24/2023 $191.86 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4812 08/24/2023 $3,578.00 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4813 08/24/2023 $468.53 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4814 08/24/2023 $198.16 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4815 08/24/2023 $2,435.50 TRAINING 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4816 08/24/2023 $3,359.87 SUPPLIES 62880 AMERICAN MARKER 4817 08/24/2023 $14,374.56 CONTRACT SERVICES 3016 ANTARES GOLF LLC 4818 08/24/2023 $3,169.48 CONTRACT SERVICES 3588 ANTHONYS PORTABLE RESTROOMS INC 4819 08/24/2023 $101.43 ADVERTISING/PRINTING SERVICES 35980 SAEED RADMEHR 4820 08/24/2023 $62,333.14 FUEL INVENTORY 962 MO DION & SONS INC 4821 08/24/2023 $645.68 CONTRACT SERVICES 1175 GRAPHIC ELECTRIC INC City of Montebello
Register of Demands No. 1558
From Payment Date 08/11/23 - To Payment Date 08/31/23
EXHIBIT A
WARRANT# DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VEND
OR #
VENDOR NAME
City of Montebello
Register of Demands No. 1558
From Payment Date 08/11/23 - To Payment Date 08/31/23
4822 08/24/2023 $650.68 CONTRACT SERVICES 16760 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 4823 08/24/2023 $76,118.13 CONTRACT SERVICES 35250 NATIONWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 4824 08/24/2023 $53.45 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 59960 JO ANN PANOSIAN 4825 08/24/2023 $39.45 SUPPLIES 1120 BLUETRITON BRANDS INC 4826 08/24/2023 $5,705.10 SUPPLIES 31270 STARBOARD TACK SUPPLY INC 4827 08/24/2023 $285.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 2865 WEBSTERS BEE REMOVAL SERVICES 4828 08/31/2023 $1,991.30 TRAINING 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4829 08/31/2023 $1,568.41 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4830 08/31/2023 $3,255.57 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4831 08/31/2023 $214.55 ADVERTISING/PRINTING SERVICES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4832 08/31/2023 $1,548.58 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4833 08/31/2023 $202.53 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4834 08/31/2023 $111.72 FUEL 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4835 08/31/2023 $879.94 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4836 08/31/2023 $169.75 FUEL 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4837 08/31/2023 $59.59 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4838 08/31/2023 $2,997.62 ADVERTISING/PRINTING SERVICES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4839 08/31/2023 $3,010.05 SUPPLIES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4840 08/31/2023 $81.18 FUEL 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4841 08/31/2023 $2,612.40 ADVERTISING/PRINTING SERVICES 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4842 08/31/2023 $219.04 FUEL 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4843 08/31/2023 $441.86 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 3163 BANK OF AMERICA 4844 08/31/2023 $191.61 FUEL 3163 BANK OF AMERICA
4845 08/31/2023 $2,795,973.62 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 3981 ALLIANCE BUILDING SOLUTIONS, INC. 4846 08/31/2023 $571.22 SUPPLIES 2586 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 4847 08/31/2023 $34,957.59 CONTRACT SERVICES 3016 ANTARES GOLF LLC 4848 08/31/2023 $26,643.20 CONTRACT SERVICES 2793 IBE DIGITAL 4849 08/31/2023 $9,650.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 1612 JCL TRAFFIC SERVICES 4850 08/31/2023 $1,500.00 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 2704 JACQUELINE LEON 4851 08/31/2023 $200.00 TRAINING 3778 LAWRENCE MOON
4852 08/31/2023 $341.68 CONTRACT SERVICES 19250 N/S CORPORATION 4853 08/31/2023 $26,940.80 CONTRACT SERVICES 35250 NATIONWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 4854 08/31/2023 $5,500.97 CONTRACT SERVICES 54240 PDQ ENTERPRISES INC 4855 08/31/2023 $126.10 CONTRACT SERVICES 3140 WEX HEALTH INC ACH TOTAL $3,226,509.27
EXHIBIT A
WARRANT# DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VEND
OR #
VENDOR NAME
City of Montebello
Register of Demands No. 1558
From Payment Date 08/11/23 - To Payment Date 08/31/23
600859 08/15/2023 $2,273.73 CONTRACT SERVICES 34750 BOB MURRAY & ASSOCIATES 600860 08/17/2023 $59.03 UTILITY SERVICES 1732 AT&T CORP 600861 08/17/2023 $1,089.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 1287 ALTA LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 600862 08/17/2023 $875.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 1429 JEFF ANAYA 600863 08/17/2023 $196.58 SUPPLIES 3650 JOSEFINA ARANA
600864 08/17/2023 $0.00 VOID 39550 AT&T
600865 08/17/2023 $4.41 UTILITY SERVICES 39550 AT&T
600866 08/17/2023 $4,100.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3868 ATLANTIC STRATEGIES, LLC 600867 08/17/2023 $1,134.00 DUE TO CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION 68300 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION 600868 08/17/2023 $1,396.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 58240 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 600869 08/17/2023 $13,800.03 UTILITY SERVICES 47580 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 600870 08/17/2023 $69.98 UTILITY SERVICES 55830 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 600871 08/17/2023 $5,296.50 UTILITY SERVICES 55830 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 600872 08/17/2023 $28,000.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3417 CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS 600873 08/17/2023 $822.17 PERMITS AND FEES 31150 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 600874 08/17/2023 $525.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3736 JACQUELYN ROSE DIAZ 600875 08/17/2023 $5,844.48 CONTRACT SERVICES 3334 EAGLE PORTABLES SANITATION LLC 600876 08/17/2023 $200.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 4201 ALFREDO ESTRADA 600877 08/17/2023 $5,047.43 UNIFORM EXPENSE 55650 GALLS LLC 600878 08/17/2023 $67,860.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 13750 CITY OF GLENDALE 600879 08/17/2023 $100.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 2313 BIANCA GONZALEZ 600880 08/17/2023 $1,289.45 SUPPLIES 2059 HASA INC
600881 08/17/2023 $652.51 SUPPLIES 59300 HODGE PRODUCTS INC 600882 08/17/2023 $960.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 2942 JAIROS PLUMBING INC 600883 08/17/2023 $15,707.92 CONTRACT SERVICES 2539 JL GROUP LLC 600884 08/17/2023 $2,060.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 40910 LOS ANGELES AREA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION 600885 08/17/2023 $776.05 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/EXPENSES 2931 M-VISION GRAPHICS INC 600886 08/17/2023 $25,339.13 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDING - PAVING THE WAY 3489 MARK THOMAS & COMPANY INC 600887 08/17/2023 $2,151.80 SUPPLIES 43370 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC 600888 08/17/2023 $469.83 SUPPLIES 1474 NATIONAL TRENCH SAFETY INC 600889 08/17/2023 $1,518.47 SUPPLIES 15620 OFFICE DEPOT INC 600890 08/17/2023 $200.00 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 832 FERNANDO PELAEZ 600891 08/17/2023 $2,496.41 UNIFORM EXPENSE 56260 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 600892 08/17/2023 $200.00 TRAINING 51460 RIO HONDO COMMUNITY COLLEGE 600893 08/17/2023 $39,157.09 UTILITY SERVICES 14730 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER COPage 3
EXHIBIT A
WARRANT# DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VEND
OR #
VENDOR NAME
City of Montebello
Register of Demands No. 1558
From Payment Date 08/11/23 - To Payment Date 08/31/23
600894 08/17/2023 $160.35 PERMITS AND FEES 28240 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 600895 08/17/2023 $6,150.85 PERMITS AND FEES 28240 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 600896 08/17/2023 $160.35 PERMITS AND FEES 28240 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 600897 08/17/2023 $504.91 PERMITS AND FEES 28240 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 600898 08/17/2023 $149.25 PERMITS AND FEES 28240 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 600899 08/17/2023 $160.35 PERMITS AND FEES 28240 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 600900 08/17/2023 $52,912.96 UTILITY SERVICES 45630 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 600901 08/17/2023 $3,653.78 CONTRACT SERVICES 3762 SUPERIOR PROTECTION SERVICES CA INC 600902 08/17/2023 $2,542.19 UTILITY SERVICES 72570 US TELEPACIFIC CORP 600903 08/17/2023 $119.77 CONTRACT SERVICES 3042 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) INC 600904 08/17/2023 $712.50 CONTRACT SERVICES 191 VECTOR RESOURCES INC 600905 08/17/2023 $150.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 4131 ANTONIO VIDRIO 600906 08/17/2023 $104,939.10 CONTRACT SERVICES 40860 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 600907 08/17/2023 $267.00 UTILITY SERVICES 39550 AT&T
600908 08/17/2023 $4,617.80 UTILITY SERVICES 39550 AT&T 600909 08/17/2023 $37.75 UTILITY SERVICES 39550 AT&T
600910 08/17/2023 $250.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 4203 DOLORES FONSECA 600911 08/24/2023 $50.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4214 DONNA AGUILAR 600912 08/24/2023 $700.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 1429 JEFF ANAYA 600913 08/24/2023 $700.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 4143 FELICITY ARAIZA-GOMEZ 600914 08/24/2023 $2,243.00 UTILITY SERVICES 38380 AT&T 600915 08/24/2023 $5,955.41 UTILITY SERVICES 39550 AT&T 600916 08/24/2023 $56.84 UTILITY SERVICES 39550 AT&T
600917 08/24/2023 $551.25 SUPPLIES 3121 C & O MFG
600918 08/24/2023 $136.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4205 EDMER CABALLEROS 600919 08/24/2023 $117.14 UTILITY SERVICES 47580 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 600920 08/24/2023 $374.73 TRAINING 4134 ISRAEL CERVANTES 600921 08/24/2023 $103.83 UTILITY SERVICES 55830 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 600922 08/24/2023 $15,231.82 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/EXPENSES 45170 MONTEBELLO AUTO GROUP LLC 600923 08/24/2023 $25.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4209 ARMARA CHHEA 600924 08/24/2023 $50.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4211 VENUS COLLINS 600925 08/24/2023 $661.50 SUPPLIES 2941 CONVEYOR MANUFACTURING & SERVICE INC 600926 08/24/2023 $1,421.87 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 4174 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION, INC. 600927 08/24/2023 $1,756.13 ADVERTISING/PRINTING SERVICES 1354 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 600928 08/24/2023 $50.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4213 STEVEN DANG 600929 08/24/2023 $875.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 4142 CARLOS ALEXANDRO DIAZ DIAZPage 4
EXHIBIT A
WARRANT# DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VEND
OR #
VENDOR NAME
City of Montebello
Register of Demands No. 1558
From Payment Date 08/11/23 - To Payment Date 08/31/23
600930 08/24/2023 $150.00 TRAINING 3746 PAUL ESPINOSA
600931 08/24/2023 $70.44 MAIL/ POSTAL EXPENSE 22400 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 600932 08/24/2023 $80.00 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 4216 MONICA FLORES 600933 08/24/2023 $14,573.96 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/EXPENSES 29160 FORD OF MONTEBELLO 600934 08/24/2023 $16.66 MAIL/ POSTAL EXPENSE 3167 GLS US 600935 08/24/2023 $300.00 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 3768 EFRAIN GONZALEZ 600936 08/24/2023 $403.10 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 3528 ESTEFANIA HERNANDEZ 600937 08/24/2023 $400.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3599 JOHN H HERNANDEZ 600938 08/24/2023 $980.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 2942 JAIROS PLUMBING INC 600939 08/24/2023 $1,994.92 LEASE PAYMENT 2405 JCB FINANCE 600940 08/24/2023 $1,012.92 TRAINING 3507 MARK KIM
600941 08/24/2023 $50.00 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 4210 EUN B LEE 600942 08/24/2023 $1,200.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 40910 LOS ANGELES AREA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION 600943 08/24/2023 $6,208.58 CONTRACT SERVICES 4810 LA COUNTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS 600944 08/24/2023 $5,305.64 SUPPLIES 4163 LZB RETAIL, INC. 600945 08/24/2023 $136.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4208 EVELYN MAGCALAS 600946 08/24/2023 $4,352.62 CONTRACT SERVICES 3489 MARK THOMAS & COMPANY INC 600947 08/24/2023 $741.43 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENTS 450 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC 600948 08/24/2023 $2,000.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3206 NANCY K BOHL INC 600949 08/24/2023 $300.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3720 ANGEL NOLASCO OIDOR 600950 08/24/2023 $486.17 SUPPLIES 15620 OFFICE DEPOT INC 600951 08/24/2023 $1,765.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 2977 ONE STOP TINT SHOP 600952 08/24/2023 $22.85 UTILITY SERVICES 36610 CITY OF PICO RIVERA 600953 08/24/2023 $75.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4212 LISA M RAMIREZ 600954 08/24/2023 $68.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4206 JEGAN RAVICHANDRAN 600955 08/24/2023 $340.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3749 JONATHAN RAYGOZA 600956 08/24/2023 $75.00 TRAINING 51460 RIO HONDO COMMUNITY COLLEGE 600957 08/24/2023 $68.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4204 RUBEN RODRIGUEZ 600958 08/24/2023 $2,243.13 UTILITY SERVICES 14730 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 600959 08/24/2023 $2,209.20 TRAINING 3448 SAVAGE TRAINING GROUP LLC 600960 08/24/2023 $572.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/EXPENSES 4024 SEFAC USA, INC. 600961 08/24/2023 $68.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4207 SALVADOR SOLIS 600962 08/24/2023 $700.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3737 ALEXIS SOTELO 600963 08/24/2023 $8,051.56 UTILITY SERVICES 45630 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 600964 08/24/2023 $3,789.85 UTILITY SERVICES 40520 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 600965 08/24/2023 $936.50 CONTRACT SERVICES 3397 STERICYCLE INCPage 5
EXHIBIT A
WARRANT# DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VEND
OR #
VENDOR NAME
City of Montebello
Register of Demands No. 1558
From Payment Date 08/11/23 - To Payment Date 08/31/23
600966 08/24/2023 $4,647.50 CONTRACT SERVICES 71210 STAR-DUST TOURS INC 600967 08/24/2023 $3,092.06 UTILITY SERVICES 72570 US TELEPACIFIC CORP 600968 08/24/2023 $4,364.40 SUPPLIES 69680 TRIANGLE SPORTS INC 600969 08/24/2023 $541.31 UTILITY SERVICES 23610 VERIZON WIRELESS 600970 08/24/2023 $847.96 CONTRACT SERVICES 2905 ZUTRA WATER 600971 08/24/2023 $60.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 4074 DANIELA VALLE 600972 08/31/2023 $10,100.24 PROMOTIONS 31600 4 IMPRINT 600973 08/31/2023 $4,004.36 UTILITY SERVICES 1732 AT&T CORP 600974 08/31/2023 $350.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 2853 ALTERNATIVE FUEL SOLUTIONS 600975 08/31/2023 $700.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 1429 JEFF ANAYA 600976 08/31/2023 $700.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 4143 FELICITY ARAIZA-GOMEZ 600977 08/31/2023 $179.55 UTILITY SERVICES 39550 AT&T
600978 08/31/2023 $10,000.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3321 JOSE LUIS ZAVALA 600979 08/31/2023 $2,025.00 PERMITS AND FEES 28120 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 600980 08/31/2023 $1,218.99 UTILITY SERVICES 47580 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY 600981 08/31/2023 $335.22 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/EXPENSES 45170 MONTEBELLO AUTO GROUP LLC 600982 08/31/2023 $1,976.15 CONTRACT SERVICES 36870 CINTAS CORPORATION NO 3 600983 08/31/2023 $1,050.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3273 COUSYN GRADING & DEMOLITION INC 600984 08/31/2023 $875.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 4142 CARLOS ALEXANDRO DIAZ DIAZ 600985 08/31/2023 $250.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 4183 CHRISTOPHER NEIL DIAZ-INFANTE 600986 08/31/2023 $95.30 MAIL/ POSTAL EXPENSE 22400 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 600987 08/31/2023 $9,720.49 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/EXPENSES 29160 FORD OF MONTEBELLO 600988 08/31/2023 $3,560.03 ADVERTISING/PRINTING SERVICES 3063 HALO BRANDED SOLUTIONS INC 600989 08/31/2023 $5,520.26 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/EXPENSES 30190 IB AUTO PARTS INC 600990 08/31/2023 $249.74 CDBG - HOUSING RIGHTS CENTER 1122 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING RIGHTS CENTER 600991 08/31/2023 $1,900.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 4219 MOHAMMED KHAN 600992 08/31/2023 $1,241.51 SUPPLIES 15620 OFFICE DEPOT INC 600993 08/31/2023 $19,066.33 CONTRACT SERVICES 3279 PROCURE AMERICA INC 600994 08/31/2023 $347.37 TRAVEL & MEETINGS 4120 KORINA RODRIGUEZ 600995 08/31/2023 $14,000.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 32210 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 600996 08/31/2023 $2,844.35 UTILITY SERVICES 14730 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 600997 08/31/2023 $200.00 TRAINING 35750 STEPHEN SHARPE 600998 08/31/2023 $700.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 3737 ALEXIS SOTELO 600999 08/31/2023 $34,360.31 NOTES PAYABLE 45630 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 601000 08/31/2023 $614.22 FRINGE BENEFITS 1990 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 601001 08/31/2023 $538.20 CONTRACT SERVICES 3762 SUPERIOR PROTECTION SERVICES CA INCPage 6
EXHIBIT A
WARRANT# DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION VEND
OR #
VENDOR NAME
City of Montebello
Register of Demands No. 1558
From Payment Date 08/11/23 - To Payment Date 08/31/23
601002 08/31/2023 $1,570.40 UTILITY SERVICES 23610 VERIZON WIRELESS 601003 08/31/2023 $148.43 SUPPLIES 2905 ZUTRA WATER
CHECK TOTAL $645,961.64
Successor Agency (SA)
1507
08/24/2023 $950.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 40240 ARBITRAGE COMPLIANCE SPECIALISTS INC SA TOTAL $950.00
GRAND TOTAL $3,873,420.91
EXHIBIT
CITY OF MONTEBELLO FORECASTED AGENDA
NOTE: The attached exhibit is a draft version that is to be used for reference purposes only; agenda items, information, and dates are subject to change. The exhibit will be placed at the end of the Agenda Packet.
Item # Description Session Department Presenter
SGVCG - Presentation on Programs and Initiatives Presentation Public Affairs David Sosnowski COR - Barry Presentation Police Chief Espinosa
MCAP Quarterly Update Presentation Fire Chief Pelaez/Angélica Palmeros Police Efforts - Crime Updates per District Presentation Police Chief Espinosa Clear Channel Digital Sign Text Code Amendment and Development Agreements Public Hearing Planning Joseph Palombi
Request from Senator Bob Archuleta to Declare the Armenian Monument as a Historical Landmark Regular Business Administration Acting CM Salazar P.D. Trainees and Salary Update Regular Business HR Nicholas Razo Community HUB (Whittier Blvd) Consent Planning Joseph Palombi Cannabis Transfer/Development Agreement Modification Consent Planning Joseph Palombi E.V. Charging Stations Consent Parks and Recreation David Sosnowski Sewer System Management Plan Consent Public Works Rita Montalvo Branding and Street Name Change at Golf Course Consent Public Works Rita Montalvo Award Agr No. 4127 for Restroom Renovation (RFP No. 23-14) Consent Transit Adrianna Kendricks Award Agr No. 4131 for Bus Graphics Decal Replacement and Repainting Services (RFP No. 23-11) Consent Transit Adrianna Kendricks Approve a Blanket PO for Maintenance Related Bus Parts and Vehicle Fleet Parts Consent Transit Adrianna Kendricks
Approve Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2669 with Clean Energy Consent Transit Adrianna Kendricks Award of Medical Services - Medical Director Consent Fire Chief Pelaez/Angelica Palmeros Purchase and Loan of Squad Consent Fire and Finance Chief Pelaez/Michael Solorza Minutes Consent Administration Acting CM Salazar
Reso No. ___ Warrant Register Consent Finance Michael Solorza City Council Forecasted Agenda Calendar - September
SEPTEMBER 27TH
Updated