Agenda packet — Montebello City Council, February 12, 2025 (part 3 of 4)

PS-06657.2
9 14. Change Order Process

14.1.This SOW and related efforts are based on the information provided and gathered by OpenGov. Customer acknowledges that changes to the scope may require additional effort or time, resulting in additional cost. Any change to scope must be agreed to in writing, by both Customer and OpenGov, and documented as such via a Change Order.

No verbal agreement will be binding on OpenGov or Customer.

14.2.A Change Order is deﬁned as work that is added to or deleted from the original scope of this SOW. Depending on the magnitude of the change, it may or may not alter the original contract amount or completion date. Changes might include but are not limited to:

14.2.1.Timeline for completion

14.2.2.Sign off process

14.2.3.Cost of change and/or invoice timing

14.2.4.Amending the SOW to correct an error

14.2.5 Extension of work as the complexity identiﬁed exceeds what was expected by Customer or OpenGov

14.2.6. Change in type of OpenGov resources to support the SOW

14.3.The approval process for a Change Order is as follows:

14.3.1.Identiﬁcation and documentation of a need for modiﬁcation to the scope of the project as deﬁned in the Statement of Work and any subsequent change orders.

14.3.2.A Change Order is created and Customer and OpenGov review. The Customer will then provide Sign-off..

14.3.3.Change Order is incorporated into the Statement of Work and implemented.

Page 387 of 629 ends

PS-06657.2
10 Exhibit 1: Implementation Activities
Permitting & Licensing
Use Cases for Permitting & Licencing:
●Building Permits & Inspectional Services
●Planning and Zoning Approvals
●Public Works: Right-of-Way Permits, Waste/Water Management, etc Initiate
Provisioning Permitting & Licensing Platform
OpenGov will:
●OpenGov will provision Customer’s OpenGov entity and verify Customer has access to all purchased modules.

Customer will:
●Conﬁrm access to entity and modules.

Completion Criteria
●Customer veriﬁes access to the site.

Data Initiation
OpenGov will:
●OpenGov will provide the needed data and format to the customer. ●The data needs will be discussed for the foundational initiation of the software. ●Assign a Project Manager once the data has been collected.

Customer will:
●Provide the required data in a timely manner.

Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off that the Integrations are complete and the data is being captured as planned.

Validate
Technical Project Review
OpenGov will:
●Provide up to one (1) one-hour working sessions at the beginning of the project to:
o Review deliverables

Page 388 of 629 ends

PS-06657.2
11 o Review technical requirements
o Provide documentation on requirements and processes
OpenGov Assumptions:
●Customer will provide relevant data within two (2) weeks immediately following the kick-off meeting.

Customer will:
●Identify relevant participants for attendance.
●Conﬁrm deliverables.
●Gather and provide relevant data for the project.

Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off on project plan.

Conﬁgure
Record Types Deliverables
OpenGov will conﬁgure the following standard record type, including sub-type, drafts of Customer’s record types in the Permitting & Licensing system including Form, Workﬂow, Output Document and Fees:

Building and Inspectional Services Service Area
Two (2) record types from the following list:
●Residential Building Permit
●Commercial Building Permit
Planning and Zoning Service Area
One (1) record types from the following list:
●Internal Planning Record Type
Public Works Service Area
Four (4) record types from the following list:
●Encroachment Permit
●Street Works Permit
●Oversize Load Permit
●Roll-off Bin Permit
Customer will:
●Attend working sessions to validate, review, and iterate upon draft records. ●Test all conﬁgured record types
Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off that the Record Types have been conﬁgured. Sign-off will occur with each completed Record Type.

Data Deliverables

Page 389 of 629 ends

PS-06657.2
12 Master Address Table (MAT) Integration
OpenGov will:
●Provide a template ﬁle to be utilized by the Customer to populate MAT information. ●Import the completed template ﬁle and validate against the completed template ﬁle.

Customer will:
●Populate and validate the MAT template.

Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off that the Master Address Table has been conﬁgured.

ESRI ArcGIS Server Integration
OpenGov will:
●Integrate with the Customer’s ArcGIS public API endpoint.

Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off on the ESRI Integration.

GIS Flag Integration
OpenGov will:
●Provide a template ﬁle to be utilized by the Customer to populate GIS Flag information. ●Import the populated template ﬁle after acceptance.
●Enable the GIS Flag Integration.

Customer will:
●Populate and validate the ﬂag template ﬁle.

Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off on the GIS Flag Integration.

Accounting and Finance Export
OpenGov will:
●Provide an export of ﬁnancial data, based on the Customer’s provided format, to the Customer’s FTPS as often as nightly.

Customer will:
●Agree upon speciﬁcations prior to export.

Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off on the Accounting and Finance Export.

Autoﬁll Integration
OpenGov will:
●Provide up to two (2) Autoﬁlls, using source data from OpenGov or provided by the Customer.

Customer will:
●Provide the source data, if applicable.
●Agree upon speciﬁcations prior to upload.

Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off on the Autoﬁll Integration.

State Contractor Integration
OpenGov will:

Page 390 of 629 ends

PS-06657.2
13 ●Integrate with the California licensed professional dataset for use within OpenGov.

Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off on the State Contractor Integration.

Bluebeam Studio Prime Integration
OpenGov will:
●Enable Bluebeam Studio Prime integration
●Provide instructions on how to connect Bluebeam Studio Prime.

Customer will:
●Provide Bluebeam Studio prime license(s).
●Handle licensing and training with Bluebeam directly.

Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off on the Bluebean Integration.

Single Sign On (SSO) Integration
OpenGov will:
●Provide the SSO enablement form.
●Implement identity provider initiated SSO for Microsoft ADFS, Microsoft Azure AD, or Okta Customer will:
●Complete the SSO enablement form.
●Provide the information from the identity provided required to establish SAML or HTTPS certiﬁcation and add OpenGov as a new application in the identity provider.

Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off on the SSO Integration.

Data Migration
OpenGov will:
●Perform historic data migration from HDL using ﬂat ﬁles provided by and mapped by the customer.
●Set up historical record types, historical data will be migrated prior to the initial data load. ●Provide a report of unmatched locations
●Provide instructions for customer validation of data migration. ●Provide up to two (2) format changes for each integration ﬁle, allowing for necessary edits to be made during the testing and validation process.

OpenGov Assumptions:
●Data Migration does not exceed 250,000 records.
●Data Migration does not include database backup ﬁles.
●Data Migration does not include cleansing of corrupt data, creation or linking of applicant accounts, integration of historical fees and payments into workﬂow or ﬁnancial reports, logs of permit changes, migration of data into the workﬂow, permit attachments, import of contractor database, or hierarchical relationships between records.

Customer will:
●Complete the OpenGov provided data templates within three (3) weeks of request. ●Validate data deliverables within three (3) weeks of request. ●Conﬁgure Record Types to align with the Project Plan’s Go Live and cutover to ensure the migration encompasses all records from the legacy system. ●Sign off on data load.

Page 391 of 629 ends

PS-06657.2
14 Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off that the Data Migration has been completed.

Document Management Access
OpenGov will:
●Provide the ability for Customer to export from OpenGov and import into a third-party document management system including: listing of ﬁle names and ﬁle paths of all submitted forms, issued documents, record attachments, and record and location metadata.
●Documents will be accessible in OpenGov’s Document Management Interface for 365 days from the time they are created. The Document Management Interface only provides access to documents created after the interface is enabled.

Customer will:
●Import data into the third-party system
Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off that the Document Management Access has been provided.

Train
Administrator Training
OpenGov will:
●Provide up to twenty-six (26) hours of Permitting & Licensing system administrator training to enable system administrators on the following topics:
○Setting up the public portal
○Employee app settings
○Creating and editing record types
○Managing Forms
○Editing Documents
○Creating Workﬂows
○Setting up Inspections
○Mobile app
●Provide up to two (2) hours of Reporting & Transparency administrator training, to enable system administrators on the following topics:
○Download and upload data to Reporting & Transparency
○How to create reports and dashboards
Customer will:
●Identify the relevant participants to attend each training session.

Completion Criteria
●Administrator Training has been conducted.

End User Training
OpenGov will:
●Provide up to twenty-six (26) hours of end-user trainings designed for Plan Review, Inspectors, Finance Staff, etc. to cover the following topics:

Page 392 of 629 ends

PS-06657.2
15 ○Navigation of the system
○Manage inbox and tasks
○Take payments
○Conduct inspections
○Create records
○Mobile app
Customer will:
●Identify the relevant participants to attend each training session.

Completion Criteria
●End User Training has been conducted.

Onsite Training
OpenGov will:
●Provide one (1) three-day (3-day) onsite training event with one (1) OpenGov resource. The training agenda will be deﬁned and agreed upon by both OpenGov and the customer's project manager. Topics may include any of the following:
o Navigation of the system
o Manage inbox and tasks
o Take payments
o Conduct inspections
o Create records
o Mobile App
Customer will:
●Identify the relevant participants to attend each training session ●Host the workshop in the Customer’s facility
●Secure an adequate space (conference room or training room) within the customer's facility
●Provide wiﬁ internet connection for OpenGov resource.

Completion Criteria
●Onsite Training has been conducted.

Launch
HyperAdopt
OpenGov will:
●Provide up to eight (8) hours of HyperAdopt support from the OpenGov Project Team post Go-Live to ensure successful adoption.

Customer will:
●Identify issues and attend sessions
Completion Criteria
●Customer sign-off that the project has been completed.

Page 393 of 629 ends

PS-06657.2
16 Exhibit 2: Technical Requirements
Permitting & Licensing Technical Requirements
Master Address Table
●All addresses must have a unique ID
●Flat ﬁle, .csv, .xls, .xlsx, .txt with headers
●Parcels and address points recommended
●Recommended source data: Esri GIS, Alternative source options include: Assessor’s database, E911
ESRI ArcGIS
●A single publicly-accessible secure ESRI REST API URL
ArcGIS Flags
●Polygon Layer(s) via ESRI REST API URL, Polylines and points are not supported ●Flags will be populated via the same Publicly-accessible secure ESRI REST API URL as provided for the ESRI ArcGIS integration.

Financial and Record Exports
●Required format (columns) and sample document
Autoﬁlls using Customer source data
●Flat ﬁle, .csv, .xls, .xlsx, .txt with headers
Bluebeam Studio Prime
●Bluebeam Studio Prime license(s)
Current application forms, workﬂows, fee structures, and output documents ●PDF, Word, .csv, .xls, .xlsx with headers
Historical Data
●Flat ﬁle, .csv, .xlsx with headers
●Record type and status mapping using OpenGov template
Historical Documents
●No Historic Document migration is included in the Scope of Work Document Management Access
●ODBC access to a Microsoft SQL Server Database view or .csv ﬁle FTPS SSO
●SAML or HTTPS certiﬁcate, Whitelist OpenGov in Customer VPN or ﬁrewall

Page 394 of 629 ends

1 OpenGov End User License Agreement
City of Montebello - Revised January 30, 2025
EXHIBIT “C”
OpenGov End User License Agreement
This End User License Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made between OpenGov, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“OpenGov”), and the customer listed on the signature block below (“Customer”).

Customer is purchasing OpenGov services through an authorized reseller (“Reseller”). This Agreement, which takes effect on the date of the last signature below (“Effective Date”), sets forth the terms under which Customer may use OpenGov’s hosted software services.

1. Definitions

1.1. “Customer Data” means data that is provided by Customer to OpenGov pursuant to this Agreement (for example, by email or through Customer’s software systems of record). Customer Data does not include any confidential personally identifiable information.

1.2. “Documentation” means materials produced by OpenGov that provide information about OpenGov’s software products and systems.

1.3. “Intellectual Property Rights” means all intellectual property rights including all past, present, and future rights associated with works of authorship, including exclusive exploitation rights, copyrights, and moral rights, trademark and trade name rights and similar rights, trade secret rights, patent rights, and any other proprietary rights in intellectual property of every kind and nature.

1.1. “Order Form” means the document used between the Reseller and the Customer to purchase specified OpenGov services.

1.2. “Party” (or “Parties”) refers to OpenGov and/or Customer. For the avoidance of doubt, Reseller is not a Party to this Agreement.

1.3. “Subscription Term” means the period from the start date of the Software Services specified on the first Order Form to the last end date of the Software Services specified on any Order Form.

2. Software Services, Support, and Professional Services

2.1. Software Services. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, OpenGov will use commercially reasonable efforts to provide the commercial-off-the-shelf software solutions identified in the applicable Order Form (“Software Services”). Software Services do not include any pre-release features, functionality, and/or software that Customer elects to use while they are in beta.

2.2. Support and Service Levels. Customer support is available by email to [email protected] or by using the chat messaging functionality of the Software Services, both of which are available during OpenGov’s standard business hours. Customer may report issues any time; however, OpenGov will address issues during business hours.

OpenGov will provide support for the Software Services in accordance

Page 395 of 629 ends

2 OpenGov End User License Agreement
City of Montebello - Revised January 30, 2025
with the Support and Software Service Levels found at opengoc.com/service-sla, as long as Customer is entitled to receive support under the applicable Order Form and this Agreement.

2.3. Professional Services. If OpenGov or its authorized independent contractors provides professional services to Customer through Reseller, such as implementation services, then OpenGov will specify the professional services (“Professional Services”) in an applicable statement of work (“SOW”), which is incorporated herein by reference. Unless otherwise specified in a SOW, any pre-paid professional services must be utilized within one year from the Effective Date.

3. Restrictions and Responsibilities

3.1. Restrictions. Customer may not use the Software Services in any manner or for any purpose other than as expressly permitted by the Agreement. In addition, Customer shall not, and shall not permit or enable any third party to: (a) use or access any of the Software Services to build a competitive product or service; (b) modify, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer or otherwise make any derivative use of the Software Services (except to the extent applicable laws specifically prohibit such restriction); (c) sell, license, rent, lease, assign, distribute, display, host, disclose, outsource, copy or otherwise commercially exploit the Software Services; (d) perform or disclose any benchmarking or performance testing of the Software Services, including but not limited to load testing, or stress testing; (e) remove any proprietary notices included with the Software Services; (f) use the Software Services in violation of applicable law; or (g) transfer any confidential personally identifiable information to OpenGov or the Software Services platform.

3.2. Responsibilities. Customer shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining computers and third-party software systems of record (such as Customer’s ERP systems) needed to connect to, access or otherwise use the Software Services. Customer also shall be responsible for: (a) ensuring that such equipment is compatible with the Software Services, (b) maintaining the security of such equipment, user accounts, passwords and files, and (c) all uses of Customer user accounts by any party other than OpenGov.

4. Intellectual Property Rights; License Grants; Access to Customer Data

4.1. Software Services. OpenGov owns all interests and Intellectual Property Rights in the Software Services. The look and feel of the Software Services, including any custom fonts, graphics and button icons, are the property of OpenGov. Customer may not copy, imitate, or use them, in whole or in part, without OpenGov’s prior written consent. Subject to Customer’s obligations under this Agreement, OpenGov grants Customer a non-exclusive, royalty-free license during the Subscription Term to use the Software Services.

4.2. Customer Data. Customer Data and the Intellectual Property Rights therein belong to Customer.

Customer grants OpenGov and its partners (such as hosting providers) a non- exclusive, royalty- free license to use, store, edit, and reformat Customer Data for the

Page 396 of 629 ends

3 OpenGov End User License Agreement
City of Montebello - Revised January 30, 2025
purpose of providing the Software Services. Customer further agrees that OpenGov and its partners may use aggregated, anonymized Customer Data for purposes of product enhancement, customer service, and data analysis. Insights gleaned from aggregated, anonymized Customer Data will belong to OpenGov.

4.3. Access to Customer Data. Customer may download Customer Data from the Software Services at any time during the Subscription Term, excluding during routine software maintenance periods.

4.4. Deletion of Customer Data. Unless otherwise requested pursuant to this Section 4.4, upon the termination of this Agreement, Customer Data shall be deleted pursuant to OpenGov’s standard data deletion and retention practices, which is to delete Customer Data 45 days after termination or expiration of the Agreement. Upon written request, Customer may request deletion of Customer Data prior to the date of termination of this Agreement. Such a request must be addressed to “OpenGov Vice President, Customer Success” at OpenGov’s address for notice in Section 10.2.

4.5. Feedback. “Feedback” means suggestions, comments, improvements, ideas, or other feedback or materials regarding the Software Services provided by Customer to OpenGov, including feedback provided through online developer community forums. Customer grants OpenGov a non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide license to use and incorporate Feedback into the Software Services and Documentation. OpenGov will exclusively own any improvements or modifications to the Software Services and Documentation based on or derived from any of Customer’s Feedback including all Intellectual Property Rights in and to the improvements and modifications.

5. Confidentiality

5.1. “Confidential Information" means all confidential business, technical, and financial information of the disclosing Party that is marked as “Confidential” or an equivalent designation or that should reasonably be understood to be confidential given the nature of the information and/or the circumstances surrounding the disclosure. OpenGov’s Confidential Information includes, without limitation, the software underlying the Software Services, and all Documentation.

5.2. Confidential Information does not include: (a) data that Customer has previously released to the public; (b) data that Customer would be required to release to the public upon request under applicable federal, state, or local public records laws; (c) Customer Data that Customer requests OpenGov make available to the public in conjunction with the Software Services; (d) information that becomes publicly known through no breach by either Party; (e) information that was rightfully received by a Party from a third Party without restriction on use or disclosure; or (f) information independently developed by the receiving Party without access to the disclosing Party’s Confidential Information.

5.3. Each Party agrees to obtain prior written consent before disclosing any of the other Party's Confidential Information. Each Party further agrees to use the other's

Page 397 of 629 ends

4 OpenGov End User License Agreement
City of Montebello - Revised January 30, 2025
Confidential Information only in connection with this Agreement. Each Party further agrees to protect the other Party's Confidential Information using the measures that it employs with respect to its own Confidential Information of a similar nature, but in no event with less than reasonable care.

If a Party is required to disclose Confidential Information by law or court order, they must notify the other Party in writing before making the disclosure to give the other Party an opportunity to oppose or limit the disclosure.

6. Term and Termination

6.1. Subscription Term. This Agreement commences when the Parties execute this Agreement and continues until the last end date of the Software Services specified on the Order Form, unless sooner terminated pursuant to Section 6.3.

6.2. Renewal. This Agreement will renew if Customer enters another Order Form for the Software Services and/or additional Professional Services before the end of the Subscription Term.

6.3. Termination for Cause. If either Party materially breaches any term of this Agreement and fails to cure such breach within 30 days after receiving written notice by the non- breaching Party the non-breaching Party may terminate this Agreement.

6.4. Termination for Non-Appropriation. For any term after the first full year of this Agreement, Customer may terminate this Agreement if it does not appropriate funds to continue this Agreement in a future fiscal year by providing notice in writing no less than 30 days before the end of the then-current term, and if they terminate the Order Form with the Reseller. Such termination shall be effective upon the expiration of the then- current term. To invoke termination under this section, Customer must use good faith efforts to secure the appropriate funds for the next year’s fees.

6.5. Effect of Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 6: (a) Customer shall pay in full for all Software Services and Professional Services for the then- current annual term, (b) OpenGov shall stop providing Software Services and Professional Services to Customer; and (c) each party shall (at the other party’s option) return or delete any of the other party’s Confidential Information in its possession.

7. Payment of Fees
Fees for Software Services are due at the beginning of each year of the Subscription Term, and Customer must timely pay all applicable fees to Reseller to avoid interruption of the Software Services. Fees for Professional Services are due in advance, unless indicated otherwise in the Order Form.

8. Representations and Warranties; Disclaimer

8.1. By OpenGov.

8.1.1. General Warranty. OpenGov represents and warrants that it has all right and authority necessary to enter into and perform this Agreement.

8.1.2. Professional Services Warranty. OpenGov further represents and warrants that the

Page 398 of 629 ends

5 OpenGov End User License Agreement
City of Montebello - Revised January 30, 2025
Professional Services, if any, will be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner in accordance with the related SOW and generally prevailing industry standards. For any breach of the Professional Services warranty, OpenGov will re- perform the applicable services. If OpenGov is unable to re-perform such work as warranted, Customer will be entitled to recover all fees paid to OpenGov for the deficient work. Customer must give written notice of any claim under this warranty to OpenGov within 90 days of the completion of Professional Services pursuant to the applicable SOW to receive such warranty remedies.

8.1.3. Software Services Warranty. OpenGov further represents and warrants that for the Term, the Software Services will perform in all material respects in accordance with the Documentation. The foregoing warranty does not apply to any Software Services that have been used in a manner other than as set forth in this Agreement. OpenGov does not warrant that the Software Services will be uninterrupted or error-free. Customer must give written notice of any claim under this warranty to OpenGov within 90 days of Customer discovering the defect. For any breach of the Software Services warranty, OpenGov will repair or replace any nonconforming Software Services so that the affected portion of the Software Services operates as warranted. If OpenGov is unable to do so, Customer may terminate the license for such Software Services and Reseller will be entitled to recover all fees paid to OpenGov for the deficient Software Services.

8.2. By Customer. Customer represents and warrants that (a) it has all right and authority necessary to enter into and perform this Agreement; and (b) OpenGov’s use of Customer Data pursuant to this Agreement will not infringe, violate or misappropriate the Intellectual Property Rights of any third party.

8.3. Disclaimer. OPENGOV DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SOFTWARE SERVICES WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE; NOR DOES IT MAKE ANY WARRANTY AS

TO THE RESULTS THAT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE SOFTWARE SERVICES. EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION 8, THE SOFTWARE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED “AS IS” AND OPENGOV DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER WARRANTIES,

EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES

OF MERCHANTABILITY, TITLE, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT.

9. Limitation of Liability

9.1. By Type. NEITHER PARTY, NOR ITS SUPPLIERS, OFFICERS, AFFILIATES,

REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS OR EMPLOYEES, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE

OR LIABLE WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT UNDER ANY CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, OR OTHER THEORY:
(A) FOR ERROR OR INTERRUPTION OF USE OR FOR LOSS OR INACCURACY OF

DATA OR COST OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES OR LOSS OF BUSINESS; (B) FOR ANY INDIRECT, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES; OR (C) FOR ANY MATTER BEYOND A PARTY’S REASONABLE CONTROL, EVEN IF SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE.

Page 399 of 629 ends

6 OpenGov End User License Agreement
City of Montebello - Revised January 30, 2025

9.2. By Amount. IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY’S AGGREGATE, CUMULATIVE

LIABILITY FOR ANY CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THIS

AGREEMENT EXCEED THE FEES PAID FOR THE SOFTWARE SERVICES UNDER THE APPLICABLE ORDER FORM IN THE 12 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE ACT THAT GAVE RISE TO THE LIABILITY.

9.3. Limitation of Liability Exclusions. The limitations of liability set forth in Sections 9.1 and

9.2 above do not apply to, and each party accepts liability to the other for: (a) claims based on either Party’s intentional breach of its obligations set forth in Section 5 (Confidentiality), (b) claims arising out of fraud or willful misconduct by either Party and (c) either Party’s infringement of the other Party’s Intellectual Property Rights.

9.4. No Limitation of Liability by Law. Because some jurisdictions do not allow liability or damages to be limited to the extent set forth above, some of the above limitations may not apply to Customer, including but not limited to the California Tort Claims Act (California Government Code Section s 815 et seq.).

10. Miscellaneous

10.1. Logo Use. OpenGov shall have the right to use and display Customer’s logos and trade names for marketing and promotional purposes in OpenGov’s website and marketing materials, subject to Customer’s trademark usage guidelines provided to OpenGov.

10.2. Notice. Ordinary day-to-day operational communications may be conducted by email, live chat or telephone. For notices required by the Agreement the parties must communicate more formally in a writing sent via USPS certified mail and via email. OpenGov’s addresses for notice are: [email protected] with a mailed copy to OpenGov, Inc., 660 3rd Street, Suite 100, San Francisco, CA 94107.

10.3. Anti-corruption. Neither OpenGov nor any of its employees or agents has offered or provided any illegal or improper payment, gift, or transfer of value in connection with this Agreement.

The Parties will promptly notify each other if they become aware of any violation of any applicable anti-corruption laws in connection with this Agreement.

The Parties agree, therefore, that, in addition to any other remedy that the aggrieved Party may have, it shall be entitled to seek equitable injunctive relief without being required to post a bond or other surety or to prove either actual damages or that damages would be an inadequate remedy.

10.5. Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be held responsible or liable for any losses arising out of any delay or failure in performance of any part of this Agreement due to any act of god, act of governmental authority, or due to war, riot, labor difficulty, failure of performance by any third- party service, utilities, or equipment provider, or any other cause to the extent it is beyond the reasonable control of the Party delayed or prevented from performing.

10.6. Severability; Waiver. If any provision of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable or

Page 400 of 629 ends

7 OpenGov End User License Agreement
City of Montebello - Revised January 30, 2025
invalid, that provision will be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that this Agreement will otherwise remain in full force and effect and enforceable. Any express waiver or failure to exercise promptly any right under this Agreement will not create a continuing waiver or any expectation of non-enforcement.

10.7. Survival. The following sections of this Agreement shall survive termination: Section 5. (Confidentiality), Section 7 (Payment of Fees), Section 4.4 (Deletion of Customer Data), Section

8.3 (Warranty Disclaimer), Section 9 (Limitation of Liability) and Section 10 (Miscellaneous).

10.8. Assignment. There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Section 10.8, neither party may assign, delegate, or otherwise transfer this Agreement or any of its rights or obligations to a third party without the other party's written consent, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Either party may assign, without such consent but upon written notice, its rights and obligations under this Agreement to its corporate affiliate or to any entity that acquires all or substantially all of its capital stock or its assets related to this Agreement, through purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise. Any other attempted assignment shall be void. This Agreement will benefit and bind permitted assigns and successors.

10.9. Independent Contractors. This Agreement does not create an agency, partnership, joint venture, or employment relationship, and neither party has any authority to bind the other.

10.10. Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement will be governed by the laws of Customer’s jurisdiction, without regard to conflict of laws principles. The parties submit to personal jurisdiction and venue in the courts of Customer’s jurisdiction.

10.11. Complete Agreement. OpenGov has made no other promises or representations to Customer other than those contained in this Agreement. Any additional or different terms in a purchase order or click-through agreement are expressly rejected by the Parties and are void. Any modification to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by an authorized representative of each party.
[ENTER CUSTOMER NAME] OpenGov, Inc.

Signature Signature
Name Name
Title Title
Date Date

Page 401 of 629 ends

8 OpenGov End User License Agreement
City of Montebello - Revised January 30, 2025

Page 402 of 629 ends

1 OpenGov End User License Agreement City of Montebello, CA - Revised January 30, 2025 OpenGov End User License Agreement
T
his End User License Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made between OpenGov, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“OpenGov”), and the customer listed on the signature block below (“Customer”).

1. Definitions

1.1. “Customer Data” means data that is provided by Customer to OpenGov pursuant to this Agreement (for example, by email or through Customer’s software systems of record).

Customer Data does not include any confidential personally identifiable information.

1.2. “Documentation” means materials produced by OpenGov that provide information about OpenGov’s software products and systems.

1.1. “Order Form” means the document used between the Reseller and the Customer to purchase specified OpenGov services.

1.2. “Party” (or “Parties”) refers to OpenGov and/or Customer. For the avoidance of doubt, Reseller is not a Party to this Agreement.

1.3. “Subscription Term” means the period from the start date of the Software Services specified on the first Order Form to the last end date of the Software Services specified on any Order Form.

2. Software Services, Support, and Professional Services

Customer may report issues any time; however, OpenGov will address issues during business hours. OpenGov will provide support for the Software Services in accordance with the Support and Software Service Levels found at opengov.com/service-sla, as

ATTACHMENT F

Page 403 of 629 ends

2 OpenGov End User License Agreement City of Montebello, CA - Revised January 30, 2025 long as Customer is entitled to receive support under the applicable Order Form and this Agreement.

3. Restrictions and Responsibilities

Customer also shall be responsible for: (a) ensuring that such equipment is compatible with the Software Services, (b) maintaining the security of such equipment, user accounts, passwords and files, and (c) all uses of Customer user accounts by any party other than OpenGov.

4. Intellectual Property Rights; License Grants; Access to Customer Data

Subject to Customer’s obligations under this Agreement, OpenGov grants Customer a non-exclusive, royalty-free license during the Subscription Term to use the Software Services.

4.2. Customer Data. Customer Data and the Intellectual Property Rights therein belong to Customer. Customer grants OpenGov and its partners (such as hosting providers) a non- exclusive, royalty-free license to use, store, edit, and reformat Customer Data for the

Page 404 of 629 ends

3 OpenGov End User License Agreement City of Montebello, CA - Revised January 30, 2025 purpose of providing the Software Services. Customer further agrees that OpenGov and its partners may use aggregated, anonymized Customer Data for purposes of product enhancement, customer service, and data analysis. Insights gleaned from aggregated, anonymized Customer Data will belong to OpenGov.

4.3. Access to Customer Data. Customer may download Customer Data from the Software Services at any time during the Subscription Term, excluding during routine software maintenance periods.

Customer grants OpenGov a non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide license to use and incorporate Feedback into the Software Services and Documentation. OpenGov will exclusively own any improvements or modifications to the Software Services and Documentation based on or derived from any of Customer’s Feedback including all Intellectual Property Rights in and to the improvements and modifications.

5. Confidentiality

5.3. Each Party agrees to obtain prior written consent before disclosing any of the other Party's Confidential Information. Each Party further agrees to use the other's

Page 405 of 629 ends

4 OpenGov End User License Agreement City of Montebello, CA - Revised January 30, 2025 Confidential Information only in connection with this Agreement. Each Party further agrees to protect the other Party's Confidential Information using the measures that it employs with respect to its own Confidential Information of a similar nature, but in no event with less than reasonable care. If a Party is required to disclose Confidential Information by law or court order, they must notify the other Party in writing before making the disclosure to give the other Party an opportunity to oppose or limit the disclosure.

6. Term and Termination

6.2. Renewal. This Agreement will renew if Customer enters another Order Form for the Software Services and/or additional Professional Services before the end of the Subscription Term.

6.5. Effect of Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 6: (a) Customer shall pay in full for all Software Services and Professional Services for the then-current annual term, (b) OpenGov shall stop providing Software Services and Professional Services to Customer; and (c) each party shall (at the other party’s option) return or delete any of the other party’s Confidential Information in its possession.

8. Representations and Warranties; Disclaimer

8.1. By OpenGov.

8.1.1. General Warranty. OpenGov represents and warrants that it has all right and authority necessary to enter into and perform this Agreement.

8.1.2. Professional Services Warranty. OpenGov further represents and warrants that the

Page 406 of 629 ends

5 OpenGov End User License Agreement City of Montebello, CA - Revised January 30, 2025 Professional Services, if any, will be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner in accordance with the related SOW and generally prevailing industry standards. For any breach of the Professional Services warranty, OpenGov will re- perform the applicable services. If OpenGov is unable to re-perform such work as warranted, Customer will be entitled to recover all fees paid to OpenGov for the deficient work. Customer must give written notice of any claim under this warranty to OpenGov within 90 days of the completion of Professional Services pursuant to the applicable SOW to receive such warranty remedies.

Customer must give written notice of any claim under this warranty to OpenGov within 90 days of Customer discovering the defect. For any breach of the Software Services warranty, OpenGov will repair or replace any nonconforming Software Services so that the affected portion of the Software Services operates as warranted. If OpenGov is unable to do so, Customer may terminate the license for such Software Services and Reseller will be entitled to recover all fees paid to OpenGov for the deficient Software Services.

8.3. Disclaimer. OPENGOV DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SOFTWARE SERVICES WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE; NOR DOES IT MAKE ANY WARRANTY AS TO THE RESULTS THAT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE SOFTWARE SERVICES. EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION 8, THE SOFTWARE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED “AS IS”

AND OPENGOV DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,

INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, TITLE, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT.

9. Limitation of Liability

9.1. By Type. NEITHER PARTY, NOR ITS SUPPLIERS, OFFICERS, AFFILIATES,

REPRESENTATIVES, CONTRACTORS OR EMPLOYEES, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE OR

LIABLE WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT UNDER ANY CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, OR OTHER THEORY: (A) FOR ERROR OR

INTERRUPTION OF USE OR FOR LOSS OR INACCURACY OF DATA OR COST OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES OR LOSS OF BUSINESS; (B) FOR

ANY INDIRECT, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES; OR (C) FOR ANY MATTER BEYOND A PARTY’S REASONABLE CONTROL, EVEN IF SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE.

Page 407 of 629 ends

6 OpenGov End User License Agreement City of Montebello, CA - Revised January 30, 2025

9.2. By Amount. IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY’S AGGREGATE, CUMULATIVE LIABILITY

FOR ANY CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT

EXCEED THE FEES PAID FOR THE SOFTWARE SERVICES UNDER THE APPLICABLE ORDER FORM IN THE 12 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE ACT THAT GAVE RISE TO THE LIABILITY.

9.3. Limitation of Liability Exclusions. The limitations of liability set forth in Sections 9.1 and

10. Miscellaneous

OpenGov’s addresses for notice are: [email protected] with a mailed copy to OpenGov, Inc., 660 3rd Street, Suite 100, San Francisco, CA 94107.

10.3. Anti-corruption. Neither OpenGov nor any of its employees or agents has offered or provided any illegal or improper payment, gift, or transfer of value in connection with this Agreement. The Parties will promptly notify each other if they become aware of any violation of any applicable anti-corruption laws in connection with this Agreement.

10.4. Injunctive Relief. The Parties acknowledge that any breach of the confidentiality provisions or the unauthorized use of a Party’s intellectual property may result in serious and irreparable injury to the aggrieved Party for which damages may not adequately compensate the aggrieved Party. The Parties agree, therefore, that, in addition to any other remedy that the aggrieved Party may have, it shall be entitled to seek equitable injunctive relief without being required to post a bond or other surety or to prove either actual damages or that damages would be an inadequate remedy.

10.5. Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be held responsible or liable for any losses arising out of any delay or failure in performance of any part of this Agreement due to any act of god, act of governmental authority, or due to war, riot, labor difficulty, failure of performance by any third-party service, utilities, or equipment provider, or any other cause to the extent it is beyond the reasonable control of the Party delayed or prevented from performing.

10.6. Severability; Waiver. If any provision of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable or

Page 408 of 629 ends

7 OpenGov End User License Agreement City of Montebello, CA - Revised January 30, 2025 invalid, that provision will be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that this Agreement will otherwise remain in full force and effect and enforceable. Any express waiver or failure to exercise promptly any right under this Agreement will not create a continuing waiver or any expectation of non-enforcement.

10.7. Survival. The following sections of this Agreement shall survive termination: Section 5. (Confidentiality), Section 7 (Payment of Fees), Section 4.4 (Deletion of Customer Data), Section 8.3 (Warranty Disclaimer), Section 9 (Limitation of Liability) and Section 10 (Miscellaneous).

10.9. Independent Contractors. This Agreement does not create an agency, partnership, joint venture, or employment relationship, and neither party has any authority to bind the other.

City of Montebello OpenGov, Inc.

Signature ___________________________ Signature __________________________ Name ___________________________ Name __________________________ Title ___________________________ Title __________________________ Date ___________________________ Date __________________________

Page 409 of 629 ends

ITEM # 17

CITY OF MONTEBELLO

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: Raul Alvarez, City Manager

BY: Cesar Roldan, Director of Public Works

SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 25-12 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

AND/OR THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO EXECUTE

AGREEMENTS AND AMENDMENTS WITH CALTRANS AND

AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF ALL PROJECT AND/OR RIGHT OF

WAY CERTIFICATIONS TO RECEIVE FEDERAL AND/OR STATE

FUNDING FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

DATE: February 12, 2025

RECOMMENDATIONS:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 25-12 authorizing the City Manager and/or the Director of Public Works to execute all master agreements, program supplemental agreements, cooperative agreements, fund exchange agreements, and fund transfer agreements and/or any amendments thereto with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and authorize the execution of all projects and/or right of way certifications as necessary for the City of Montebello to receive federal and/or state funding for certain transportation projects; and

2. Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of this resolution.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Federal regulations (23 CFR 710.201) assign the State the overall responsibility for the acquisition of right of way on all federal-aid highway projects and also require the State to have a right of way organization adequately staffed, equipped, and organized to meet

Page 410 of 629 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Page 2 of 5 ends

this responsibility. The City may acquire right of way on federal-aid projects only if the City is qualified in accordance with this manual section, or meets the requirements under Section 17.05.07.01, “Nonqualified Local Public Agency (LPAs) - Options.” Further, unless State agencies are performing the right of way activities, the State’s policy requires using only qualified LPAs, or their qualified consultants, for locally funded projects on the State Highway System, regardless of whether the projects have federal aid.

At this time, City of Montebello staff are not qualified to perform all right-of-way functions, such as land acquisition, including, though not limited to the necessary technical work associated with land acquisition. To be qualified, the City must:
• Be adequately staffed, trained, and organized to do right-of-way work properly and timely, and
• Agree to conform to Department policies and procedures in order to meet state and federal requirements.

Local agencies that are not qualified to perform any or all of the respective right-of-way functions for a project must either hire another agency which is qualified to perform those functions or retain a consultant(s) who meets the Consultant Selection Criteria discussed in Section 17.06.00.00.

As part of the review process for projects on the State Highway System, the LPA must provide work plans, timelines with milestones, and staffing plans (including their plans for contracting with consultants or another LPA) for review and concurrence prior to execution of any consultant contracts covering right of way activities. This review should be triggered by the Authorizing Document and should be initiated at the time the Cooperative Agreement is being drafted.

Non-qualified LPAs have the following options:

1. Contract with a qualified agency.

2. Contract with a qualified private consultant(s) to perform one or more right of way functions. Appraisal consultants must have a license issued by the State Office of Real Estate Appraisers; acquisition consultants must have a valid California Real Estate Brokers License or Sales License and work for a Real Estate Broker with a valid license; relocation consultants must have training and experience in relocation work under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act. For additional information, refer to Section 17.06.00.00 on consultant qualifications.

3. Contract with an R/W Project Management Consultant. The contract must include provisions requiring any subcontractors to meet the right-of-way qualification standards set forth for right-of-way consultants. The LPA must retain the ability to monitor and control the qualifications of any subcontractors through the contract process.

4. Utilize a mixture of LPA staff and the resources available above at Items 1 and 2.

Page 411 of 629 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Page 3 of 5 ends

5. Contract with a “turnkey” consultant. The contract must include provisions requiring the subcontractor to meet the right-of-way qualification standards set forth for right-of-way consultants. The LPA must retain the ability to monitor and control the qualifications of subcontractors through the contract process.

The authority for selection of private sector consultants to perform R/W functions on federal-aid projects has been delegated to the LPAs. The selection process will be administered by the LPA in accordance with Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10: Consultant Selection, using criteria from Exhibit 13-C: Consultant Selection Criteria and Guide prepared by Caltrans to establish recommended minimum experience levels and to evaluate the qualifications of prospective consultant firms. When substantially different R/W services are needed, it is incumbent on the LPA to repeat the consultant selection process in choosing a consultant for those different services. The District Right of Way Local Programs Coordinator can provide additional assistance if needed.

The LPA should be advised that caution must always be exercised in the choice of a consultant, particularly with regard to the firm’s experience on past projects and the firm’s references. Each project and each agency have unique demands and just because a prospective consultant may meet the broad qualifications contained in the Consultant Selection Criteria, it does not also mean that the consultant meets the LPA’s requirements. The LPA is responsible for maintaining written documentation concerning the consultant selection process to ensure that the procedures comply with the Exhibit 13-C: Consultant Selection Criteria and Guide. This information should be made available to Caltrans as part of the Caltrans monitoring process.

LPAs are responsible and accountable for the actions of their consultants in properly executing their duties and activities in accordance with the Uniform Act. The LPA retains the ultimate responsibility for signing the R/W Certifications. Also, LPAs receiving federal funds must take affirmative steps to assure that Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) consultants have ample opportunity to compete for consultant work. Such steps include soliciting DBE firms, and when feasible, organizing the project schedule and task requirements to encourage participation by DBE firms.

Consultant Contracts
Competitive bidding is one of the cornerstones of a financially successful project. The competitive bid process is required for new contracts and/or replacing an expired contract. LPAs must not enter into a contract or renew an expired contract without completing the competitive bid process. Seeking bids from qualified firms will ensure that the LPA is getting the most reasonable price. Prior to soliciting bids, careful consideration should be given to defining the scope of the consultant’s work, estimating the cost of the consultant’s work, determining the type of contract needed, and deciding whether to seek bids on a project-by-project or time-base method
.

The project-by-project method is appropriate for use when the LPA has only one project or has an extensive project expected to last more than 36 months. Under this method the consultant performs the tasks exclusively on the designated project until completion. All

Page 412 of 629 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Page 4 of 5 ends

four commonly used contracts are suitable for use with the project-by-project method and include:
• Actual Cost plus Fixed Fee
• Cost per Unit of Work
• Specific Rates of Compensation
• Lump Sum

The time-base method is appropriate for LPAs with multiple projects occurring simultaneously. This method is more cost effective as the agency is not required to complete the competitive bid process for each individual project. Under this approach the same consultant can perform R/W tasks on different projects during the contract term.

The maximum contract length is 36 months. If the contract needs to be extended due to unforeseen circumstances, the LPA must complete Exhibit 12-F: Cost- Effectiveness/Public Interest Finding and submit it to the DLAE along with a written justification. The contract may be extended, once with a maximum length of 12 months.

Of the four types of contracts noted above, it is not appropriate to use the Lump Sum contract with the time-based method. The LPA which enters into a contract with a consultant for the performance of R/W work retains ultimate responsibility for the actions of the consultant. Caltrans has established broad criteria for use in evaluating the qualifications in the respective R/W functions, but Caltrans is in no way liable either for devising such criteria or for the performance of consultants chosen by the LPA. In the event the actions or performance of the consultant result in a loss of federal funds for the project, it is the sole responsibility of the LPA to repay these funds.

Consultants must perform R/W functions to the same standards, practices, rules, and regulations as the LPA. The District R/W Local Programs/Assistance staff will monitor the work products of the consultants using the guidelines discussed under The Monitoring Process in Section 13.2: Federal-Aid and the Federal/State/Local Agency Relationship.

The LPA responsibilities also include the following in connection with project completion:
• A formal review of the appraisal (noted above) is required when federal funds are used for any portion of the project.
• An establishment of just compensation is necessary. The LPA must approve the fair market value appraisal and determine what compensation is to be paid in projects involving the acquisition of real property. This is a federal requirement and cannot be delegated to the consultant.
• The assignment of a Contract Manager who is knowledgeable in all aspects of the project is needed to serve as the contact person during the course of the project (see Contract Administration below).
• If the LPA has any questions or concerns regarding the hiring of R/W Consultants, they are encouraged to contact the nearest District Right of Way Office for assistance or guidance.

LEGAL REQUIREMENT:

Caltrans requires a City Council adopted resolution to receive Federal and/or State

Page 413 of 629 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Page 5 of 5 ends

funding. The resolution delegates authority to the City Manager and/or the Director of Public Works to execute any and all Master Agreements, Program Supplemental Agreements, Fund Exchange Agreements, and Fund Transfer Agreements and/or any amendments. Caltrans is now requiring the City to designate a responsible official authorized to execute all project and/or right-of-way certifications. Since these certifications are related to the review and submittal of project packages for Caltrans’ review and authorization, staff recommend designating the City Manager and/or the Director of Public Works to execute all project and/or right-of-way certifications. None of these authorizations allow staff to acquire property which is reserved and remains with the City Council.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

N/A

ANALYSIS:

N/A

SUMMARY:

It is recommended the City Council adopt Resolution No. 25-12, granting authority to the City Manager and/or the Director of Public Works to execute all master agreements, program supplemental agreements, cooperative agreements, fund exchange agreements, and fund transfer agreements, along with any necessary amendments, with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). This resolution also authorizes the execution of all project-related and right-of-way certifications required for the City of Montebello to secure federal and/or state funding for designated transportation projects.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Attachment A - Resolution No. 25-12

Page 414 of 629 ends

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 25-12

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO

APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR DIRECTOR OF

PUBLIC WORKS TO EXECUTE ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR ALL STATE AND/OR FEDERALLY FUNDED

PROJECTS AND TO SIGN ALL STATE AND/OR FEDERAL FUNDING

DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS BETWEEN

THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RECITALS
WHEREAS, all federally funded right-of-way projects are implemented through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.08.14.11 of Chapter 17 of the Caltrans Right-of-Way Manual, “Right-of-Way” certification must be executed by an authorized official of the City of Montebello; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with said section of the Caltrans Right-of-Way Manual, a resolution giving a responsible agency official blanket authority to execute Right-of-Way certifications must be adopted by the City Council; and WHEREAS, prior to requesting authorization to advertise and award a construction contract, the local agency responsible for the project must prepare, sign, and submit a right-of-way certification to Caltrans.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager and/or the Director of Public Works to execute all Right-of-Way Certifications for all state and/or federally funded projects.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager and/or the Director of Public Works to sign and submit all Funding Allocation Request letters and Documents for all state and/or federally funded projects.

SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption by the City Council. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

Page 415 of 629 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-12

Page 2 of 2 ends

APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025.

Salvador Melendez, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF MONTEBELLO )
I, Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk of the City of Montebello, County of Los Angeles, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-12 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Montebello, signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 12th day of February 2025 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to-wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

The undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Montebello, does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true, full and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of said City which was duly convened and held on the date stated thereon, and that said document has not been amended, modified, repealed or rescinded since its date of adoption and is in full force and effect as of the date hereof.

DATE:

Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk

Page 416 of 629 ends

ITEM # 18

CITY OF MONTEBELLO

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: Raul Alvarez, City Manager

BY: Cesar Roldan, Director of Public Works

SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 25-14 ACCEPTING THE 2024

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PROGRAM ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION & SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT (CP 930) AND

AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT

WITH THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF

GOVERNMENTS (SCAG)

DATE: February 12, 2025

RECOMMENDATIONS:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 25-14 accepting the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2024 Sustainable Communities Program Active Transportation & Safety Program grant in the amount of $362,500; and

2. Amend the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget by increasing appropriations by $362,500 in Account No. 265-30-334-6040.10 10 (Grants, Public Works, SCAG – SCP Active Transportation, Contract Services Outside Contracts [Expenditures]) and $362,500 in Account No. 265-99-4198.26 (Grants, SCAG - SCP Active Transportation [Revenue]); and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and all other applicable documents as a condition of approval to receive grant funds; and

4. Authorize staff to coordinate with SCAG staff to initiate the environmental clearance processes under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act

5. Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The recommended action of accepting the Sustainable Communities Program (SCP)

Page 417 of 629 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Page 2 of 4 ends

Active Transportation and Safety Grant requires amending the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget by increasing appropriations by $362,500 in Account No. 265-30-334-6040.10 10 (Grants, Public Works, SCAG – SCP Active Transportation, Contract Services Outside Contracts [Expenditures]) and $362,500 in Account No. 265-99-4198.26 (Grants, SCAG - SCP Active Transportation [Revenue]). Acceptance via the adoption of Resolution No. 25-14 (Attachment A) is required in order to receive the grant funds. City Council action commits the City to paying for specified services and subsequently seeking reimbursement from SCAG once funding is made available.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

In June 2024, following adoption of Connect SoCal 2024 and to support Connect SoCal implementation, the Regional Council directed staff to release a call for applications through the Sustainable Communities Program (SCP) focused on active transportation and safety. The SCP sought proposals for active transportation-related plans and quick- build projects, which primarily support Connect SoCal 2024 mobility policies under Complete Streets, Transit and Multimodal Integration, and Safety. A total of 40 applications were evaluated, and 13 projects were recommended for funding through a combination of state and federal sources.

The following is SCAG’s timeline:
• California Transportation Commission adopts the 2025 ATP Regional Program, including the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety projects: June 26-27, 2025
• 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety project initiation: Summer/Fall 2025

The City applied for a "quick-build project" along Whittier Boulevard at the eastern city limits (i.e., Rio Hondo River bridge). The Montebello CycleSafe Bridge Project addresses pedestrian and bicycle safety access, enhances signage to the Rio Hondo River Trail, and promotes integration between the bike paths and the historic Whittier Boulevard bridge. Working with community stakeholders, the project will add aesthetic value, update informational signage, and enhance the accessibility between the regional bike path and a key entry point to the City of Montebello. In so doing, the project will elevate the pedestrian experience on the bridge and make it safer and more user-friendly for bicyclists.

The quick-build project is an interim capital improvement project that requires minor construction activity (does not require excavation) and uses durable, low- to medium-cost materials to pilot and iterate through project designs with community feedback. Quick- Build projects are identified through community engagement and provide the opportunity to immediately respond to a community safety need. This quick-build project provides an opportunity to pilot projects that not only enhance or expand the active transportation network but also contribute to a more resilient transportation network given the increased demand expected with large-scale events to be hosted by the region.

Quick-Build projects must include the following components:

Page 418 of 629 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Page 3 of 4 ends

• Ongoing community engagement to inform final project design and evaluation. • Data collection to establish existing conditions and to complete before/after evaluation of project implementation.
• Final (100%) project design reviewed, approved, and stamped by a licensed Professional Engineer and project cost estimates.
• Quick-Build installed for a minimum of six (6) months before conducting evaluation.
• Final report summarizing work completed and recommendation of next steps.

Upon approval of Resolution No. 25-14 (Attachment A), staff will coordinate with SCAG and complete the necessary steps to complete this project.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

The City shall be the implementing agency for environmental approval(s) and responsible for documentation of environmental clearance or categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for federally funded projects. Funding shall be contingent on the City securing environmental clearance. Upon Regional Council approval, SCAG staff will begin coordinating with City staff to initiate the environmental clearance processes.

LEGAL REQUIREMENT:

ANALYSIS:

N/A

SUMMARY:

It is recommended the City Council adopt Resolution No. 25-14 (Attachment A) to accept the 2024 Sustainable Communities Programs Active Transportation and Safety Program grant from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) in the amount of $362,500; amend the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget by increasing appropriations by $362,500 in Account No. 265-30-334-6040.10 10 (Grants, Public Works, SCAG – SCP Active Transportation, Contract Services Outside Contracts [Expenditures]) and $362,500 in Account No. 265-99-4198.26 (Grants, SCAG - SCP Active Transportation [Revenue]); authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and all documents related to this program; and authorize staff to coordinate with SCAG personnel to begin the environmental clearance process in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Page 419 of 629 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Page 4 of 4 ends

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Attachment A - Resolution No. 25-14

2. Attachment B - SCAG Regional Council Meeting No. 669

Page 420 of 629 ends

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 25-14

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO SUPPORTING AND ACCEPTING THE 2024 SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES

PROGRAM ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION & SAFETY PROGRAM GRANT AND

AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT WITH THE

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

RECITALS
WHEREAS, In June 2024, following adoption of Connect SoCal 2024 and to support Connect SoCal implementation, the Regional Council directed staff to release a call for applications through the Sustainable Communities Program (SCP) focused on active transportation and safety; and
WHEREAS, The SCP sought proposals for active transportation-related plans and quick-build projects, which primarily support Connect SoCal 2024 mobility policies under Complete Streets, Transit and Multimodal Integration, and Safety; and
WHEREAS, The City of Montebello applied to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2024 Sustainable Communities Program Active Transportation & Safety Program grant; and
WHEREAS, The Montebello CycleSafe Bridge Project addresses pedestrian and bicycle safety access, enhances signage to the Rio Hondo River Trail, and promotes integration between the bike paths and the historic Whittier Boulevard bridge; and
WHEREAS, Approval and acceptance via the adoption of this resolution is a condition of approval in order to receive the grant funds in the amount of $362,500; and
WHEREAS, prior to requesting authorization to advertise and award a construction contract, the local agency responsible for the project must prepare, sign, and submit project plans and specifications to SCAG for review, and perform findings of environmental clearance or categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for federally funded projects.

Page 421 of 629 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-14

Page 2 of 3 ends

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the adoption of this resolution supporting the acceptance of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2024 Sustainable Communities Program Active Transportation & Safety Program grant in the amount of $362,500.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreement and all other applicable documents as a condition of approval to receive grant funds.

SECTION 3. Authorize staff to coordinate with SCAG staff to initiate the environmental clearance processes under the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.

SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption by the City Council. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025.

Salvador Melendez, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

Page 422 of 629 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-14

Page 3 of 3 ends

Mayor and attested by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 12th day of February 2025 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to-wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

DATE:

Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk

Page 423 of 629 ends

REMOTE PARTICIPATION ONLY

PUBLIC ADVISORY
If members of the public wish to review the attachments or have any questions on any of the agenda items, please contact Maggie Aguilar at (213) 630 -1420 or via email at [email protected].

Agendas & Minutes are also available at: https://scag.ca.gov/meetings-leadership.

SCAG, in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), will accommodate persons who require a modification of accommodation to participate in this meeting. SCAG is also committed to helping people with limited proficiency in the English language access the agency’s essential public information and services. You can request such assistance by calling (213) 630-1410. We request at least 72 hours (three days) notice to provide reasonable accommodations and will make every effort to arrange for assistance as soon as possible.

MEETING NO. 669

REGIONAL COUNCIL
Thursday, December 5, 2024
12:15 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.

Members of the Public are Welcome to Attend
In-Person & Remotely
To Attend In-Person:

SCAG Main Office - Regional Council Room
900 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90017
To Attend and Participate on Your Computer:
https://scag.zoom.us/j/87880987264
To Attend and Participate by Phone:

Call-in Number: 1-669-900-6833
Meeting ID: 878 8098 7264
To Watch or View Only:
https://scag.ca.gov/scag-tv-livestream

ATTACHMENT B

Page 424 of 629 ends

Instructions for Members of the Public Attending the Meeting

Attend In-Person: Go to the SCAG Main Office located at 900 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 1700, Los Angeles, CA 90017. The meeting will take place in the Regional Council Meeting Room on the 17th floor starting at 12:15 p.m.

Attend by Computer: Click the following link: https://scag.zoom.us/j/87880987264. If Zoom is not already installed on your computer, click “Download & Run Zoom” on the launch page and press “Run” when prompted by your browser. If Zoom has previously been installed on your computer, please allow a few moments for the application to launch automatically. Select “Join Audio via Computer.” The virtual conference room will open. If you receive a message reading, “Please wait for the host to start this meeting,” simply remain in the room until the meeting begins.

Attend by Phone: Call (669) 900-6833 to access the conference room. Given high call volumes recently experienced by Zoom, please continue dialing until you connect successfully. Enter the Meeting ID: 878 8098 7264 , followed by #.

Indicate that you are a participant by pressing # to continue. You will hear audio of the meeting in progress. Remain on the line if the meeting has not yet started.

Instructions for Participating and Public Comments

In Writing: Written comments can be emailed to: [email protected]. Written comments received by 5pm on Wednesday, December 4, 2024, will be transmitted to members of the legislative body and posted on SCAG’s website prior to the meeting. You are not required to submit public comments in writing or in advance of the meeting; this option is offered as a convenience should you desire not to provide comments in real time as described below. Written comments received after 5pm on Wednesday, December 4, 2024, will be announced and included as part of the official record of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of this committee regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) are available at the Office of the Clerk, at 900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700, Los Angeles, CA 90017 or by phone at (213) 630-1420, or email to [email protected].

Remotely: If participating in real time via Zoom or phone, please wait for the presiding officer to call the item for which you wish to speak and use the “raise hand” function on your computer or *9 by phone and wait for SCAG staff to announce your name/phone number.

In-Person: If participating in-person, you are invited but not required, to fill out and present a Public Comment Card to the Clerk of the Board or other SCAG staff prior to speaking. It is helpful to indicate whether you wish to speak during the Public Comment Period (Matters Not on the Agenda) and/or on an item listed on the agenda.

General Information for Public Comments

Verbal comments can be presented in real time during the meeting. Members of the public are allowed a total of 3 minutes for verbal comments. The presiding officer retains discretion to adjust time limits as necessary to ensure efficient and orderly conduct of the meeting, including equally reducing the time of all comments.

For purpose of providing public comment for items listed on the Consent Calendar, please indicate that you wish to speak when the Consent Calendar is called. Items listed on the Consent Calendar will be acted on with one motion and there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the legislative body so requests, in which event, the item will be considered separately.

In accordance with SCAG’s Regional Council Policy, Article VI, Section H and California Government Code Section 54957.9, if a SCAG meeting is “willfully interrupted” and the “orderly conduct of the meeting” becomes unfeasible, the presiding officer or the Chair of the legislative body may order the removal of the individuals who are disrupting the meeting.

Page 425 of 629 ends

REGIONAL COUNCIL AGENDA
RC - Regional Council
Members – December 2024

1. Sup. Curt Hagman
President, San Bernardino County

2. Hon. Cindy Allen
1st Vice President, Long Beach, RC District 30

3. Hon. Ray Marquez
2nd Vice President, Chino Hills, RC District 10

4. Hon. Art Brown
Imm. Past President, Buena Park, RC District 21

5. Hon. Damon Alexander
San Bernardino, RC District 7

6. Hon. Valerie Amezcua
Santa Ana, RC District 16

7. Sup. Kathryn Barger
Los Angeles County

8. Hon. Karen Bass
Member-At-Large

9. Hon. Elizabeth Becerra
Victorville, RC District 65

10. Hon. Bob Blumenfield
Los Angeles, RC District 50

11. Hon. Gary Boyer
Glendora, RC District 33

12. Hon. Drew Boyles
El Segundo, RC District 40

13. Hon. Wendy Bucknum
Mission Viejo, RC District 13

14. Hon. Margaret Clark
Rosemead, RC Distric 32

15. Hon. Jenny Crosswhite
Santa Paula, RC District 47

16. Hon. Kevin de León
Los Angeles, District 61

Page 426 of 629 ends

REGIONAL COUNCIL AGENDA

17. Hon. Rick Denison
Yucca Valley, RC District 11

18. Hon. Jon Dumitru
Orange, RC District 17

19. Ms. Lucy Dunn
Business Representative, Non-Voting Member

20. Hon. Keith Eich
La Cañada Flintridge, RC District 36

21. Hon. Margaret Finlay
Duarte, RC District 35

22. Hon. Claudia Frometa
Downey, RC District 25

23. Hon. John Gabbard
Dana Point, RC District 12

24. Hon. James Gazeley
Lomita, RC District 39

25. Hon. Marshall Goodman
La Palma, RC District 18

26. Hon. Michael Goodsell
ICTC Representative

27. Hon. Jan C. Harnik
Imm. Past President, RCTC Representative

28. Hon. Marqueece Harris-Dawson
Los Angeles, RC District 55

29. Hon. Mark Henderson
Gardena, RC District 28

30. Hon. Eunisses Hernandez
Los Angeles, RC District 48

31. Hon. Laura Hernandez
Port Hueneme, RC District 45

32. Hon. Heather Hutt
Los Angeles, RC District 57

33. Hon. Mike Judge
VCTC Representative

Page 427 of 629 ends

REGIONAL COUNCIL AGENDA

34. Hon. Joe Kalmick
Seal Beach, RC District 20

35. Hon. Trish Kelley
TCA Representative

36. Hon. Kathleen Kelly
Palm Desert, RC District 2

37. Hon. Tammy Kim
Irvine, RC District 14

38. Hon. Lauren Kleiman
Newport Beach, RC District 15

39. Hon. Paul Krekorian
Los Angeles, RC District 49/Public Transit Rep.

40. Hon. Linda Krupa
Hemet, RC District 3

41. Hon. Andrew Lara
Pico Rivera, RC District 31

42. Hon. John Lee
Los Angeles, RC District 59

43. Hon. Carlos Leon
Anaheim, RC District 19

44. Hon. Patricia Lock Dawson
Riverside, RC District 68

45. Sup. Vianey Lopez
Ventura County

46. Hon. Clint Lorimore
Eastvale, RC District 4

47. Hon. Ken Mann
Lancaster, RC District 43

48. Hon. Steve Manos
Lake Elsinore, RC District 63

49. Hon. Andrew Masiel
Tribal Govt Regl Planning Board Representative

50. Hon. Larry McCallon
Air District Representative

Page 428 of 629 ends

REGIONAL COUNCIL AGENDA

51. Hon. Casey McKeon
Huntington Beach, RC District 64

52. Hon. Tim McOsker
Los Angeles, RC District 62

53. Hon. Lauren Meister
West Hollywood, RC District 41

54. Hon. L.Dennis Michael
Rancho Cucamonga, RC District 9

55. Hon. Marisela Nava
Perris, RC District 69

56. Hon. Frank Navarro
Colton, RC District 6

57. Hon. Imelda Padilla
Los Angeles, RC District 53

58. Hon. Traci Park
Los Angeles, RC District 58

59. Hon. Nikki Perez
Burbank, District 42

60. Sup. Luis Plancarte
Imperial County

61. Hon. Curren Price
Los Angeles, RC District 56

62. Hon. Nithya Raman
Los Angeles, RC District 51

63. Hon. Gil Rebollar
Brawley, RC District 1

64. Hon. Rocky Rhodes
Simi Valley, RC District 46

65. Hon. Monica Rodriguez
Los Angeles, RC District 54

66. Hon. Ali Saleh
Bell, RC District 27

67. Hon. Steve Sanchez
La Quinta, District 66

Page 429 of 629 ends

REGIONAL COUNCIL AGENDA

68. Hon. Tim Sandoval
Pomona, RC District 38

69. Hon. Suely Saro
Long Beach, RC District 29

70. Hon. Zak Schwank
Temecula, RC District 5

71. Hon. David J. Shapiro
Calabasas, RC District 44

72. Hon. Marty Simonoff
Brea, RC District 22

73. Hon. Jose Luis Solache
Lynwood, RC District 26

74. Sup. Hilda Solis
Los Angeles County

75. Hon. Hugo Soto-Martinez
Los Angeles, RC District 60

76. Sup. Karen Spiegel
Riverside County

77. Hon. Steve Tye
Diamond Bar, RC District 37

78. Sup. Donald Wagner
Orange County

79. Hon. Alan Wapner
SBCTA Representative

80. Hon. Acquanetta Warren
Fontana, District 8

81. Hon. Thomas Wong
Monterey Park, District 34

82. Hon. Jeff Wood
Lakewood, RC District 24

83. Hon. Katy Yaroslavsky
Los Angeles, RC District 52

84. Hon. Frank A. Yokoyama
Cerritos, RC District 23

Page 430 of 629 ends

REGIONAL COUNCIL AGENDA

Southern California Association of Governments
900 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1700 – Regional Council Room Los Angeles, CA 90017
Thursday, December 5, 2024
12:15 PM
The Regional Council may consider and act upon any of the items on the agenda regardless of whether they are listed as Information or Action items.

CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
(The Honorable Curt Hagman, President)

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (Matters Not on the Agenda)
This is the time for public comments on any matter of interest within SCAG’s jurisdiction that is not listed on the agenda. For items listed on the agenda, public comments will be received when that item is considered. Although the committee may briefly respond to statements or questions, under state law, matters presented under this item cannot be discussed or acted upon at this time.

REVIEW AND PRIORITIZE AGENDA ITEMS

CHAIR’S REPORT
• The Honorable David J. Shapiro – Community, Economy and Human Development Committee • The Honorable Luis Plancarte – Energy and Environment Committee • The Honorable Mike T. Judge – Transportation Committee

CONSENT CALENDAR

Approval Items

1. Minutes of the Meeting – November 7, 2024

2. 2024 Sustainable Communities Program Active Transportation and Safety Recommended Projects

3. SCAG Memberships and Sponsorships

Receive and File

4. December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update

5. Status Update on the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidance for Evaluating Cumulative Impacts from Air Toxics

6. Purchase Orders, Contract and Amendments below Regional Council’s Approval Threshold

7. CFO Monthly Report

Page 431 of 629 ends

REGIONAL COUNCIL AGENDA

INFORMATION ITEMS

8. Southern California Economic Update 75 Mins. (SCAG Economic Round Table)

9. Federal Elections Update 30 Mins.
(Javiera Cartagena, Director of Government and Public Affairs, SCAG; and Holland & Knight)

BUSINESS REPORT
(Lucy Dunn, Ex-Officio Member; Business Representative)

PRESIDENT’S REPORT
(The Honorable Curt Hagman, President)

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT
(Kome Ajise, Executive Director)

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

ANNOUNCEMENTS

ADJOURNMENT

Page 432 of 629 ends

REPORT

Southern California Association of Governments
December 5, 2024

NO. 668

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

REGIONAL COUNCIL

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2024

THE FOLLOWING MINUTES ARE A SUMMARY OF ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE REGIONAL COUNCIL. A VIDEO RECORDING OF THE ACTUAL MEETING IS AVAILABLE ON THE SCAG WEBSITE AT:
http://scag.iqm2.com/Citizens/

The Regional Council (RC) of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) held a regular meeting both in person and virtually (telephonically and electronically). A quorum was present.

Members Present
Sup. Curt Hagman, President San Bernardino County
Hon. Cindy Allen, 1st Vice President Long Beach District 30 Hon. Ray Marquez, 2nd Vice President Chino Hills District 10 Hon. Art Brown, Imm. Past President Buena Park District 21 Sup. Luis Plancarte Imperial County
Sup. Don Wagner Orange County
Sup. Karen Spiegel Riverside County
Sup. Vianey Lopez Ventura County
Michael Goodsell ICTC
Hon. Jan Harnik, RCTC
Hon. Alan Wapner SBCTA
Hon. Trish Kelley TCA
Hon. Mike T. Judge VCTC
Hon. Clint Lorimore Eastvale District 4
Hon. Frank Navarro Colton District 6
Hon. Damon L. Alexander San Bernardino District 7
Hon. Rick Denison Yucca Valley District 11
Hon. John Gabbard Dana Point District 12
Hon. Wendy Bucknum Mission Viejo District 13
Hon. Carlos Leon Anaheim District 19
Hon. Joe Kalmick Seal Beach District 20
Hon. Marty Simonoff Brea District 22
Packet Pg. 9

Page 433 of 629 ends

REPORT

Hon. Frank Yokoyama Cerritos District 23
Hon. Jeff Wood Lakewood District 24
Hon. Mark E. Henderson Gardena District 28
Hon. Ali Saleh Bell District 27
Hon. Andrew Lara Pico Rivera District 31
Hon. Thomas Wong Monterey Park District 34
Hon. Margaret E. Finlay Duarte District 35
Hon. Keith Eich La Cañada Flintridge District 36
Hon. Lauren Meister West Hollywood District 41
Hon. Nikki Perez Burbank District 42
Hon. David J. Shapiro Calabasas District 44
Hon. Rocky Rhodes Simi Valley District 46
Hon. Jenny Crosswhite Santa Paula District 47
Hon. Steve Manos Lake Elsinore District 63
Hon. Steve Sanchez La Quinta District 66
Hon. Patricia Lock Dawson Riverside District 68
Hon. Marisela Nava Perris District 69
Hon. Larry McCallon Air District Representative
Ms. Lucy Dunn Business Representative

Members Not Present Members Not Present Members Not Present Sup. Kathryn Barger Los Angeles County

Los Angeles County
Sup. Hilda Solis Los Angeles County
Hon. Gil Rebollar Brawley District 1
Hon. Kathleen Kelly Palm Desert District 2
Hon. Linda Krupa Hemet District 3
Hon. Zak Schwank Temecula District 5
Hon. Acquanetta Warren Fontana District 8
Hon. L. Dennis Michael Rancho Cucamonga District 9
Hon. Tammy Kim Irvine District 14
Hon. Lauren Kleiman Newport Beach District 15
Hon. Valerie Amezcua Santa Ana District 16
Hon. Jon Dumitru Orange District 17
Hon. Marshall Goodman La Palma District 18
Hon. Claudia Frometa Downey District 25
Hon. José Luis Solache Lynwood District 26
Hon. Suely Saro Long Beach District 29
Hon. Margaret Clark Rosemead District 32
Hon. Gary Boyer Glendora District 33
Hon. Steve Tye Diamond Bar District 37
Packet Pg. 10

Page 434 of 629 ends

REPORT

Hon. Tim Sandoval Pomona District 38
Hon. James Gazeley Lomita District 39
Hon. Drew Boyles El Segundo District 40
Hon. Ken Mann Lancaster District 43
Hon. Laura Hernandez Port Hueneme District 45
Hon. Eunisses Hernandez Los Angeles District 48
Hon. Paul Krekorian Los Angeles District 49/Public Transit Rep.

Hon. Bob Blumenfield Los Angeles District 50
Hon. Nithya Raman Los Angeles District 51
Hon. Katy Young Yaroslavsky Los Angeles District 52
Hon. Imelda Padilla Los Angeles District 53
Hon. Monica Rodriguez Los Angeles District 54
Hon. Marqueece Harris-Dawson Los Angeles District 55
Hon. Curren D. Price, Jr. Los Angeles District 56
Hon. Heather Hutt Los Angeles District 57
Hon. Traci Park Los Angeles District 58
Hon. John Lee Los Angeles District 59
Hon. Hugo Soto-Martinez Los Angeles District 60
Hon. Kevin de León Los Angeles District 61
Hon. Tim McOsker Los Angeles District 62
Hon. Casey McKeon Huntington Beach District 64
Hon. Elizabeth Becerra Victorville District 65
Hon. Celeste Rodriguez San Fernando District 67
Hon. Andrew Masiel, Sr. Pechanga Dev. Corp. Tribal Gov’t Reg’l Planning Brd.

Hon. Karen Bass Los Angeles Member-at-Large

Staff Present
Kome Ajise, Executive Director
Darin Chidsey, Chief Operating Officer
Cindy Giraldo, Chief Financial Officer
Sarah Jepson, Chief Planning Officer
Javiera Cartagena, Chief Government and Public Affairs Officer Carmen Flores, Chief Human Resources Officer
Julie Shroyer, Chief Information Officer
Jeffery Elder, Chief Counsel
Ruben Duran, Board Counsel
Maggie Aguilar, Clerk of the Board
Cecilia Pulido, Deputy Clerk of the Board

Packet Pg. 11

Page 435 of 629 ends

REPORT

President Hagman called the meeting to order at 12: 17 p.m. and asked Immediate Past President Art Brown, Buena Park, District 21, to lead the pledge of allegiance.

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD

President Hagman opened the Public Comment Period for persons to comment on any matter pertinent to SCAG’s jurisdiction that were not listed on the agenda.

Ruben Duran, Board Counsel, acknowledged there w as one public comment received before the 5:00 p.m. deadline and indicated that it had been transmitted to the Regional Council members.

The Clerk of the Board also acknowledged that they had not received any Public Comment speaker cards for items not listed on the agenda.

Seeing no public comment speakers for items not listed on the agenda, President Hagman closed the Public Comment Period.

REVIEW AND PRIORITIZE AGENDA ITEMS

There were no requests to prioritize agenda items.

President Hagman asked Board Counsel to explain how voting would be handled.

Ruben Duran, Board Counsel, stated that this was an in -person only meeting and they would not be having any remote participation under the Brown Act. However, he noted that pursuant to their obligations to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, they had received one request from a member of the Regional Council for an accommodation. He further noted that the accommodation had been provided. He explained that the clerk w ould take a verbal vote after members had used their voting device to record their votes.

CHAIR’S REPORT

David J. Shapiro, Community, Economy and Human Development Committee (CEHD) Chair, reported that at the CEHD Committee meeting they had two information items . The first presentation was an update on Implementation Strategies included within Connect SoCal 2024 which was given by Elizabeth Carvajal, SCAG’s Deputy Secretary of Planning in Land Use . The other presentation was on two reports related to SCAG’s Inclusive Economic Recovery Strategy (IERS) implementation grant program: 1) Addressing Barriers to Economic Opportunities and 2) Apprenticeship Best Practices . He further noted that i n Spring 2022, with support from State Packet Pg. 12

CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Page 436 of 629 ends

REPORT

Senator Susan Rubio, SCAG received one -time grant funding from the California Workforce Development Board to implement several core recommendations from the IERS and to guide SCAG’s efforts in advancing inclusive economic growth. He shared that to better understand how these reports would help deliver inclusive economic prosperity to their region, the CEHD committee heard from SCAG staff, their project consultants, and speakers from the Institute for Local Government.

There were no comments on the CEHD Chair report.

Luis Plancarte, Energy and Environment Committee (EEC) Chair, reported that at the EEC Committee meeting they had three information items. He noted that the first was an expert panel on groundwater sustainability that consisted of speakers from UCLA’s Luskin Center for Innovation, the California Department of Water Resources , Ventura County of Public Works , and Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency. He shared that the speakers focused on the importance of groundwater for a resilient and reliable water supply and related key policies, challenges, and opportunities at the state, regional, and local levels. He noted that the second item was on the joint MPO letter sent to CARB on SB 375 and the response from CARB . He indicated that t he third item focused on Connect SoCal 2024 implementation strategies and the progress made in advancing them to this point.

There were no comments on the EEC Chair report.

Mike Judge, Transportation Committee (TC) Vice Chair, reported that at the Transportation Committee recommended the approval of the SCAG Region’s project nominations which were seeking Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP) funding. He also reported that they had four information item presentations. The first presentation was from Frances Dea -Sanchez, Associate Deputy Director at the California Transportation Commission , who provided an update on State Senate Bill 1121 State and Local Transportation Needs Assessment. He shared that the needs assessment was intended to provide an understanding of statewide transportation funding needs and anticipated revenues. He noted that the Commission w ould be releasing the draft needs assessment for public comment and w ould be finalized for submission to the Legislature in early 2025. He indicated that i n light of the revenue shortfalls forecasted and road charge strategies identified to mitigate in Connect SoCal 2024, this was a critical discussion to be having statewide.

He also reported that they received a presentation on SCAG’s Connect SoCal 2024: Implementation Strategies and some core programs like the Regional Pilot Initiatives (RPI), which directly support the implementation of Connect SoCal via innovative pilot projects with local cities and other partners. He also reported that the Transportation Committee received a presentation regarding the Future Communities Pilot Program (FCPP) and an update on SCAG’s Smart Cities Program , key examples of Connect SoCal implementation, in partnership with local cities and other partners.

Packet Pg. 13

Page 437 of 629 ends

REPORT

There were no comments on the TC Chair report.

President Hagman asked Board Counsel Duran to address the rules for the meeting with Regional Council Member Frank Navarro, Colton, District 6.

Board Counsel Duran asked Regional Council Member Navarro to ensure that his video was engaged at all times and if there was someone in the room with him over the age of 18 to please identify them for the record in compliance with the Attorney General’s Opinion in California.

Regional Council Member Navarro stated that there was nobody else present for the meeting in his office.

CONSENT CALENDAR

There were no Public Comments on the Consent Calendar.

President Hagman stated that he had two notes to report f or the Consent Calendar. For Item No. 4, there was a typographical error in the last sentence of the 7 th Recital of Resolution No. 24-668-1. As described in the staff report, the General Fund budget was proposed to be increased, instead of decreased. For Item No. 9, partners ha d withdrawn two projects from the Trade Corridor Enhancement Program nomination list – which changes the total number of projects from 15 to 13, and the total regional funding ask from $474 million to $323 million. He noted that the projects that had been withdrawn were Caltrans’ Arizona & California Railroad Desert Rail Infrastructure Improvement Project and LA Metro's Malabar Yard project, both of which appear ed on the project list on page 101 of the agenda packet.

Board Counsel Duran reminded Regional Council Member Navarro to activate his camera.

Approval Items

1. Minutes of the Meeting – September 5, 2024

2. 2025 Meeting Schedule of the Executive Administration Committee, Policy Committees, and Regional Council

3. Contract 24-020-C01 Amendment 2, Addressing Barriers to Economic Opportunities

4. Resolution No. 24-668-1 Approving Amendment 1 to the FY 2024-25 Comprehensive Budget

Packet Pg. 14

Page 438 of 629 ends

REPORT

5. Master Fund Transfer Agreement with the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the period of January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2034

6. Acceptance of Office of Traffic Safety Grant (OTS) Funds 2025: Go Human Campaign

7. Acceptance of Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Funds: Safety Modeling

8. Resolution No. 24 -668-5 to Address California's Marketplace for Residential and Commercial Property Insurance

9. 2024 Trade Corridor Enhancement Program: SCAG Region Projects Nominations

10. SCAG Memberships and Sponsorships

Receive and File

11. November 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update

12. Senate Bill 1121 State and Local Transportation Needs Assessment

13. REAP 2.0 Program Update

14. Purchase Orders, Contract and Amendments below Regional Council’s Approval Threshold

15. CFO Monthly Report

A MOTION was made (S hapiro) to approve Consent Calendar Items 1 through 10; and Receive and File Items 11 through 1 5. Motion was SECONDED (McCallon) and passed by the following roll call votes.

AYES: Allen, Brown, Bucknum, Crosswhite, Denison, Eich, Finlay, Gabbard, Goodsell, Hagman, Harnik, Henderson, Judge, J. Kalmick, Kell ey, Lara, Leon, Lock Dawson, Lopez, Lorimore, Manos, McCallon, Meister, Nava, Navarro*, Perez, Plancarte, Rhodes, Saleh, S. Sanchez, Shapiro, Simonoff, Spiegel, Wagner, Wapner, Wong, Wood, and Yokoyama (38)

NOES: Marquez** (1)

ABSTAIN: None (0)

Packet Pg. 15

Page 439 of 629 ends

REPORT

* Regional Council member Frank Navarro was not physically present during the meeting to conduct electronic voting. The Clerk of the Board asked him what his vote was for the Consent Calendar.

**Regional Council Member Marquez indicated he vote d yes on the Consent Calendar.

Unfortunately, the voting device captured a no vote.

INFORMATION ITEM

16. Vision of the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games and Lessons Learned from Paris 2024

Kome Ajise, Executive Director, reported that the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games in Los Angeles would include more than 800 events at 75 venues across the region, bringing athletes, spectators, and visitors from all over the world into Southern California, and they were beginning to marshal efforts across the region and agencies. He indicated that they would identify their role so that SCAG could continue to brief them [the Regional Council] and get direction from this board on their participation and in the preparation for the Olympics. He reported that SCAG staff ha d been working in partnership with LA28, Metro, Caltrans, the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, the Los Angeles Mayor’s Office, and Metrolink —a group collectively known as the Games Mobility Executives (GME) to develop mobility plans and pursue state and federal funds for transportation infrastructure and mobility resources before, during, and after the Games. He shared that at the EAC meeting, they had Mayor Bass speak to them about the preparation for the games and that at SCAG they were focused on their role that includes developing a regional Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan for the region. He indicated that TDM was really work that allows them to be able to scope how they manage behavior and travel demand during the games for all the people that will be here, including visitors. He indicated this would also help them manage how goods and freight will be delivered during the times of the games. He reminded them that TDM approaches had been instrumental in the success of past Olympic Games – including the 1984 Games in Los Angeles and indicated that they were looking forward to working with the large stakeholder group to come up with TDM strategies for the region with direction and guidance from the Board. He shared that they w ould be looking at the development of a suite of regional initiatives to provide resources to local jurisdictions and transit agencies to support implementation for the games, as well as promoting system improvements that support games mobility, aligning with TDM strategies that they can collectively come up with. He introduced Erin Bromaghim, Deputy Mayor of International Affairs for the City of Los Angeles to provide a presentation on the Olympic and Paralympic games. He briefly shared that in her role as Deputy Mayor of International Affairs, she was focused on bringing global opportunities to Angelenos and connecting the city to economic and cultural partners around the world. He noted that before coming to the Mayor’s office, she spent 14 years as a senior civilian with the U.S. Department of Defense, where she managed interagency defense, intelligence, special operations and security reform.

Packet Pg. 16

Page 440 of 629 ends

REPORT

Ms. Bromaghim discussed the upcoming Mega events in the region, including the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games. She highlighted the importance of preparing for these events early, as advised by Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo, and the potential for these events to serve as a deadline for policy priorities and community connectivity. She also discussed the roles and responsibilities of different entities involved in the games, including the city of Los Angeles, the Organizing Committee, and the International Olympic Committee. She also touched upon the potential economic impact of these events, with a reference to a 2017 economic impact report that would be updated. She also discussed the roles and responsibilities of the Organizing Committee, highlighting the importance of transportation and arts in the 2028 Games. She mentioned that the GME was working on 15 project teams, including transportation demand management. She also highlighted the efforts underway for the Games Arts Festival or Cultural Olympiad, with regional convenings being organized to discuss a framework and structure for the festival.

The Regional Council and Ms. Bromaghim engaged in discussions regarding the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic games. The potential for community sites to host events was discussed. Concerns about transportation, particularly the role of Metrolink, and the need for a discussion on how Metrolink will pay for its involvement was also addressed. Discussion was also had on the planning and preparation for the 2028 games and the need for federal and state support to cover the operational costs of an expanded transit system and other capacities. The success of the 1984 Olympics was highlighted as a benchmark for future events, with a focus on sustainability and minimizing the carbon footprint. The importance of supporting local small businesses during the games was emphasized, with the Mayor's commitment to this priority noted. Lastly, concerns were raised about the games being perceived as LA -centric, with a need for broader Southern California involvement.

Executive Director Ajise introduced the next speakers from LA28, the organizing committee for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games. He indicated Sam Morrissey was the Vice President of Transportation for LA28, who had more than 25 years of experience across a wide spectrum of transportation elements in the public, private and nonprofit sectors. He noted that Mr. Morrissey had an undergraduate degree in Civil Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and an MBA from University of Southern California. He also indicated that Mr. Morrissey would introduce Vic Nol who was the Director of Venue Cities Relations.

Sam Morrissey, VP of Transportation for LA28, noted they had the largest sports program of any Olympic and Paralympic games in history, with additional sports being added. He explained the locations for all those sports was something they were still determining as an organization and hoped to get this locked down soon from a transportation standpoint. He proceeded to provide an update on transportation plans and discussed the challenges and plans for the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games in Southern California. He highlighted the need to transport around 100,000 accredited stakeholders, spectators, and workforce, with a focus on public transportation. He also Packet Pg. 17

Page 441 of 629 ends

REPORT

discussed the Games Route Network, a dedicated lane system for accredited stakeholders, and the need to maintain regional traffic and business operations. He emphasized the importance of minimizing impacts on businesses and residents, and the need for a consistent wayfinding message for all aspects of the games. He also mentioned their partnership with GME and the need to work closely with security partners. He ne noted that the Secret Service would be in charge due to the event's national special security designation. He emphasized the excitement and the need for everyone's involvement.

The Regional Council and Mr. Morrissey engaged in discussions. Transportation security was addressed, and it was noted that this type of event would fall under the national incident command structure with respect to type of operation. The need for additional funding for transportation assets, specifically for Metrolink, to support the games was also addressed.

Vic Nol, Director of Venue Cities and Relations at LA28, engaged in discussions with the Regional Council and discussed the ongoing evaluation of venues and the use of temporary builds to maintain fiscal responsibility.

Executive Director Ajise thanked the speakers for their briefing on the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic games.

17. State/Regional Partnerships to Accelerate Housing Production

Executive Director Ajise reported that their housing team had prepared a staff report that highlighted key efforts SCAG was in engaged in to tackle barriers to housing production. He shared that they had been engaged in strengthening their partnerships to bring capacity to their cities and counties to enable housing production. He introduced Dhakshike Wickrema, Deputy Secretary of Homelessness at the California Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency, who had more than 15 years of experience in addressing homelessness and housing, both in public, private and nonprofit sectors. He noted that most recently she served in the office of City Council District 10, where she was the Senior Deputy for Homelessness and Housing. He also noted that she served as Senior Deputy for Homelessness and Mental Health in Los Angeles County.

Ms. Wickrema’s presentation focused on the importance of housing production and addressing homelessness in the region. She discussed the State's efforts to tackle housing barriers and strengthen partnerships. She highlighted the State's investments in housing, including the Homekey Program and the Housing Assistance Program (HAP), and mentioned the upcoming NoFA for the Behavioral Health Services Act Reform and Bond. She noted that $1 billion would be set aside for veterans with behavioral health issues who are experiencing or at risk of homelessness and another $1 billion was for anybody who was experiencing homelessness and has a behavioral challenge.

Packet Pg. 18

Page 442 of 629 ends

REPORT

The Regional Council and Ms. Wickrema engaged in discussions regarding the need for more housing units and the State's efforts to allocate public land for housing. There was also discussion on the complexity of building housing and the need for efficiency in the process.

BUSINESS REPORT

Regional Council Member Lucy Dunn, Business Representative, noted that her business report was on page 210 of the packet. She reported that with respect to federal interest rate s the 50 basis - points were granted but it did not move mortgage rates to lower them for housing. She noted that during the meeting they had gotten another 25 basis points, and they would wait to see if that helped to spur home sales. She reported that their labor market continued to be strong which tends to push up mortgage rates, but if the rates were to fall below 5.5%, nearly half of consumers would take on a mortgage for a new home purchase. She indicated not to expect mortgage rates to fall anytime soon. She shared that economists were saying that they were close to a soft landing and avoiding a recession. She noted that inflation was just a above the 2 percent goal that the Feds had been looking at but that they still ha d a bit of a two-track economy. She also shared that Proposition 36 was a big issue followed by the business community this year on retail and safety .

She reported that it passed overwhelmingly as projected . She also reported that the GLUE Council was not meeting this month and since the Economic Summit had been canceled, they would be doing a briefing in December. She noted that the GLUE Council had been invited to join the Regional Council at that presentation. She thanked SCAG for addressing the insurance crisis in California. She shared that the default insurance plan by the State was called the Fair Plan because of all the insurance companies that were leaving. She indicated that the Fair Plan had $500 billion of assets at risk which was how many Californians have had to sign up under this fair plan in place of private insurance. She further indicated that the Fair Plan was only funded to $1 billion in capacity. She expressed that perhaps the next step was to as k the R egional Council to consider asking the legislature to please fund the Fair Plan. She indicated that without insurance , c ondos didn’t get built, single family might but they needed a full range of housing to meet their goals. She indicated that they needed to keep pushing their legislators on insurance solutions and funding the Fair Plan.

PRESIDENT’S REPORT

President Hagman reported that with another election cycle working its way through, they had some lineup changes for their Regional Council and Policy Committees. He acknowledged outgoing members and thanked them for their service: Luis Plancarte, Gary Boyer, Marshall Goodman, Damon Alexander, Paul Krekorian, Immediate Past President Art Brown, Jose Luis Solache, and Celeste Rodriguez. He noted Regional Council Member Solache and Rodriguez were leaving to go to the legislature. He also reported that the Southern California Clean Cities Coalition, administered by SCAG since 2010, received two first place awards at the 2024 Clean Cities and Communities Training Workshop last month. He noted that the awards were for the greatest percentage increase Packet Pg. 19

Page 443 of 629 ends

REPORT

in gasoline gallon equivalents – which measures the use of alternative fuel sources equivalent to one gallon of fossil fuel – and the largest reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. He further noted that more than 75 coalitions across the national network of clean cities coalitions were eligible for the awards. He thanked their partners and their significant contributions in advancing alternative fuels and vehicles toward these impressive outcomes. He also reported that they convened the Emerging Technologies Committee last week to discuss their role in the last five years. He shared that there was a great summary by staff. He indicated that they were considering ending the Committee and integrating it with the policy committee meetings but that there was so much desire to keep it going. He indicated that they would be discussing how to keep it going . He also reported that due to scheduling conflicts, they were losing a meeting so they would not be having the annual Economic Summit. He explained that instead they would be passing all the information out at the December meeting. He also reported that the 60 th General Assembly was taking place May 1-2, 2025, at the JW Marriott and noted that Second Vice President Ray Marquez was working hard on this [the General Assembly Host Committee]. He indicated that if anyone wanted to help sponsor the event to contact Second Vice President Marquez or Perla Lopez, Special Events Producer. Lastly, he reminded members that the next meeting of the Regional Council was scheduled for December 5.

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT

Executive Director Ajise called the members attention to the REAP 1.0 report which was a testament to the collaboration that they had across the region and spending the resources they received from the state. He also noted that they were good stewards of those resources in trying to promote housing production. He explained that page two of the report included a list of accomplishments of the $47 million in REAP 1.0. He also reported that REAP 2.0 was a $231 million program and they had about $192 million in projects , which funds about 100 projects that are in all of their jurisdictions across the region. He explained that they were working very quickly to restart that program and get those projects going. He further explained that last month they were able to negotiate an administrative extension with the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) that allowed them to extend by seven months how they can spend the money.

He reported that there was a joint letter that the four biggest MPO’s in the state signed and sent to the Air Resources Board regarding trying to reform SB 375. He indicated that that they would continue to talk to the Board about this. He also noted that they had received a response back which was not what they were hoping to get back. He indicated that they would continue to work with them and would report back on the progress they make in reforming SB 375. He also reported that there was a presentation at the Policy Committees on the implementation strategies for Connect SoCal 2024 and noted that the strategies were organized under four categories : 1) Collaboration and Policy Leadership; 2) Federal Funding Administration; 3) Data Collection, Analysis, and Research; and 4) Local Technical Assistance Resources. He indicated that SCAG had advanced about 71 of the 93 implementation strategies in the plan. He noted that they would continue to Packet Pg. 20

Page 444 of 629 ends

REPORT

show the progress on that. He explained that one of the issues they had with SB 375 was that it doesn't give them enough opportunities to work on implementation of the plan. Lastly, he reported that on November 22 , between 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. , there would be a mobility workshop. He explained that mobility workshops were opportunities for Board members to go out in the field in different parts of the region to see what's happening as a result of the conversations that they were having here and things that are connected to the work that they all do at SCAG. He shared that they would be having an exclusive tour of the SoCal Gas Hydrogen in Downey.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

President Hagman asked staff to present at the next meeting an update on the election and possible changes that would be coming from the Federal government.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

There were no announcements.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business, President Hagman adjourned the meeting of the Regional Council at 1:48 p.m.

[MINUTES ARE UNOFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY THE REGIONAL COUNCIL] //
Packet Pg. 21

Page 445 of 629 ends

MEMBERS Representing Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Alexander, Damon L. San Bernardino, RC District 7 0 1 1 2 Allen, Cindy Long Beach, RC District 30 1 0 1 2
Amezcua, Valerie Santa Ana, RC District 16 0 0 0 0
Barger, Kathryn Los Angeles County 0 0 0 0
Bass, Karen Los Angeles, (Member at Large) 0 0 0 0
Becerra, Elizabeth Victorville, RC District 65 0 0 0 0
Blumenfield, Bob Los Angeles, RC District 50 0 0 0 0
Boyer, Gary Glendora, RC District 33 0 1 0 1
Boyles, Drew El Segundo, RC District 40 1 0 0 1
Brown, Art Buena Park, RC District 21 1 1 1 3
Bucknum, Wendy Mission Viejo, RC District 13 1 D D 1 D 1 3 Clark, Margaret Rosemead, RC District 32 1 1 0 2
Crosswhite, Jenny Santa Paula, RC District 47 1 1 1 3
de Leon, Kevin Los Angeles, RC District 61 0 0 0 0
Denison, Rick Yucca Valley, RC District 11 1 1 1 3
Dumitru, Jon Orange, RC District 17 1 0 0 1
Dunn, Lucy Business Representative 1 1 1 3
Eich, Keith La Cañada Flintridge, RC District 36 1 1 1 3 Finlay, Margaret E. Duarte, RC District 35 1 A A 0 A 1 2 Frometa, Claudia M. Downey, RC District 25 1 0 0 1
Gabbard, John Dana Point, RC District 12 0 1 1 2
Gazeley, James Lomita, RC District 39 1 0 0 1
Goodman, Marshall La Palma, RC District 18 1 0 0 1
Goodsell, Mike ICTC Representative 1 1 2
Hagman, Curt San Bernardino County 1 1 1 3
Harnik, Jan C. RCTC Rpresentative 1 1 1 3
Harris-Dawson, Marqueece Los Angeles, RC District 55 0 0 0 0 Henderson, Mark E. Gardena, RC District 28 1 0 1 2
Hernandez, Eunisses Los Angeles, RC District 48 0 0 0 0 Hernandez, Laura Port Hueneme, RC District 45 1 1 0 2
Hutt, Heather Los Angeles, RC District 57 0 R R 0 R 0 0 Judge, Mike T. VCTC Representative 1 1 1 3
Kalmick, Joe Seal Beach, RC District 20 1 1 1 3
Kelley, Trish TCA Representative 1 0 1 2
Kelly, Kathleen Palm Desert, RC District 2 1 1 0 2
Kim, Tammy Irvine, RC District 14 1 0 0 1
Kleiman, Lauren Newport Beach, RC District 15 1 0 0 1
Krekorian, Paul Los Angeles, RC District 49/Public Transit Rep 0 0 0 0 Krupa, Linda Hemet, RC District 3 1 K K 0 K 0 1
Lara, Andrew Pico Rivera, RC District 31 1 1 2
Lee, John Los Angeles, RC District 59 0 0 0 0
Leon, Carlos A. Anaheim, RC District 19 0 1 1 2
Lock Dawson, Patricia Riverside, RC District 68 0 1 1 2 Lopez, Vianey Ventura County 0 1 1 2
Lorimore, Clint Eastvale, RC District 4 1 1 1 3
Mann, Ken Lancaster, RC District 43 1 0 0 1
Manos, Steve Lake Elsinore, RC District 63 1 1 1 3
Marquez, Ray Chino Hills, RC District 10 1 1 1 3
Masiel, Andrew Pechanga Band of Luiseno IndiansTribal Gov. Reg. Plng. Brd. 0 0 0 0 McCallon, Larry Air District Representative 1 1 1 3
McKeon, Casey Huntington Beach, RC District 64 1 0 0 1
McOsker, Tim Los Angeles, RC District 62 1 0 0 1
Meister, Lauren West Hollywood, RC District 41 1 1 1 3
Michael, L. Dennis Rancho Cucamonga, RC District 9 0 0 0 0 Nava, Marisela Perris, RC District 69 1 1 1 3
Navarro, Frank J. Colton, RC District 6 1 0 1 2
Padilla, Imelda Los Angeles, RC District 53 0 0 0 0
Park, Traci Los Angeles, RC District 58 0 0 0 0
Perez, Nikki Burbank, RC District 42 0 0 1 1
Plancarte, Luis Imperial County 1 1 1 3
Total Mtgs
Attended
To Date
Regional Council Attendance Report
2024-2025
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: RC Attendance Sheet 2024-25 (Minutes of the Meeting - November 7, 2024)

Page 446 of 629 ends

Price, Curren D. Los Angeles, RCDistrict 56 0 0 0 0
Raman, Nithya Los Angeles, RC District 51 0 0 0 0
Rebollar, Gil Brawley, RC District 1 1 1 0 2
Rhodes, Rocky Simi Valley, RC District 46 1 1 1 3
Rodriguez, Celeste San Fernando, RC District 67 1 0 0 1 Rodriguez, Monica Los Angeles, RC District 54 0 0 0 0
Saleh, Ali Bell, RC District 27 1 0 1 2
Sanchez, Steve La Quinta, RC District 66 1 1 1 3
Sandoval, Tim Pomona, RC District 38 1 0 0 1
Saro, Suely Long Beach, RC District 29 1 1 0 2
Schwank, Zak Temecula, RC District 5 0 0 0 0
Shapiro, David J. Calabasas, RC District 44 1 1 1 3
Simonoff, Marty Brea, RC District 22 1 1 1 3
Solache, José Luis Lynwood, RC District 26 1 1 0 2
Solis, Hilda Los Angeles County 0 0 0 0
Soto-Martinez, Hugo Los Angeles, RC District 60 0 0 0 0 Spiegel, Karen Riverside County 1 1 1 3
Tye, Steve Diamond Bar, RC District 37 1 0 0 1
Wagner, Donald P. Orange County 1 1 1 3
Wapner, Alan SBCTA/SBCOG 1 1 1 3
Warren, Acquanetta Fontana, RC District 8 1 1 0 2
Wong, Thomas Monterey Park, RC District 34 1 1 1 3
Wood, Jeff Lakewood, RC District 24 1 1 1 3
Yaroslavsky, Katy Los Angeles, RC District 52 0 0 0 0
Yokoyama, Frank A. Cerritos, RC District 23 1 0 1 2
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: RC Attendance Sheet 2024-25 (Minutes of the Meeting - November 7, 2024)

Page 447 of 629 ends

REPORT

Southern California Association of Governments
December 5, 2024

RECOMMENDED ACTION FOR TC:

Recommend the Regional Council approve the Connect SoCal 2024 Sustainable Communities Program Active Transportation and Safety Project List and Contingency List and authorize SCAG staff to fully fund awarded projects, and if applicable, any contingency projects, subject to the identification of additional funding.

RECOMMENDED ACTION FOR RC:

Approve the Connect SoCal 2024 Sustainable Communities Program Active Transportation and Safety Project List and Contingency List and authorize SCAG staff to fully fund awarded projects, and if applicable, any contingency projects, subject to the identification of additional funding.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following Strategic Priority 5: Secure and optimize diverse funding sources to support regional priorities.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

In June 2024, following adoption of Connect SoCal 2024 and to support Connect SoCal implementation, the Regional Council directed staff to release a call for applications through the Sustainable Communities Program (SCP) focused on active transportation and safety. The SCP sought proposals for active transportation -related plans and quick-build projects, which primarily support Connect SoCal 2024 mobility policies under Complete Streets, Transit and Multimodal Integration, and Safety. A total of 4 0 applications were evaluated, and 13 projects are recommended for funding through a combination of state and federal sources.

BACKGROUND:

In June 2024, f ollowing adoption of Connect SoCal 2024 and to support Connect SoCal implementation, the Regional Council directed staff to release a call for applications through the Sustainable Communities Program (SCP) focused on Active Transportation and Safety, which primarily supports Connect SoCal 2024 mobility policies under Complete Streets, Transit and To: Transportation Committee (TC)
Regional Council (RC)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S

APPROVAL

From: Rachel Om, Senior Regional Planner
213-630-1550, [email protected]
Subject: 2024 Sustainable Communities Program Active Transportation and Safety Recommended Projects
Packet Pg. 24

Page 448 of 629 ends

REPORT

Multimodal Integration, and Safety. The 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety call for applications was open from July 8 to September 27, 2024, and solicited applications for active transportation-related plans and quick -build projects. The call is funded by Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 7 regional funds, a Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Safe Streets and Roads for All federal grant, and SCAG matching state funds . The state budget enacted in June 2024 significantly reduced ATP funding, which was intended to serve as local match for SCAG’s SS4A grant. The reduction in ATP Cycle 7 funding resulted in an approximately $1.9 million gap for SCAG’s SS4A local match.

SCAG is exploring alternative state funding sources to address the gap. To align with state ATP guidelines and reduced funding availability , in September 2024 , the Regional Council directed staff to amend the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety guidelines to reflect the revised funding availability of $8.2 million.

Engagement Summary
Prior to the opening of the call, draft guidelines were available for public comment from April 8 to 26, 2024, and the final guidelines were adopted by SCAG Regional Council on June 6, 2024 (and amended on September 5, 2024 as noted above) . In addition, staff gave presentations at over 20 county transportation commission and council of governments meetings on quick -build projects and the upcoming SCP call for projects. Following the adoption of the guidelines, staff hosted two application workshops (July 25 and August 7) and weekly office hours. Prospective applicants participated in nearly 30 office hour appointments.

Application Summary
Twenty-nine applications (12 plans and 17 quick -build projects) were submitted from five of the six counties in the SCAG region for a total funding request of $15.9 million, approximately twice the amount of funding available. Applications were received from all counties except for Imperial, though outreach was conducted. SCAG staff had several meetings with prospective applicants from Imperial County, including Imperial County Public Health Department, Westmorland School District, and City of El Centro. Challenges discussed during the Imperial County outreach meetings included identifying a lead applicant and project delivery concerns due to limited capacity. SCAG staff will continue engagement with jurisdictions across the region on future funding opportunities. Table 1 summarizes the number of applications submitted by county.

Table 1: 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Applications Submitted by County Plan Quick-Build Project Total
County Quantity Total Request Quantity Total Request Quantity Total Request Imperial 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Los Angeles 5 $1,486,670 11 $8,554,920 16 $10,041,590
Orange 6 $2,515,000 1 $890,000 7 $3,405,000
Riverside 0 $0 3 $1,645,000 3 $1,645,000
San 1 $240,000 1 $503,700 2 $743,700
Packet Pg. 25

Page 449 of 629 ends

REPORT

Bernardino
Ventura 0 $0 1 $72,000 1 $72,000
Total 12 $4,241,670 17 $11,665,620 29 $15,907,290

Evaluation Summary
Applications were reviewed by 28 evaluators from SCAG, sub -regional agencies, and community - based organizations. Evaluators had experience in active transportation, complete streets, and/or safety. Evaluators reviewed applications using the scoring rubric that was published on the SCP webpage throughout the application period. The evaluation of applications occurred during October 2024, followed by debrief sessions among evaluators. A recommended project list and contingency list were developed based on application scores, geographic equity, and funding eligibility, as described in the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety call guidelines.

Recommended Projects
Plans
Per the guidelines, the maximum plan award is $500,000. Of the nineteen plan applications considered, two plans are recommended for funding. Table 2 summarizes the recommended plans.

Given the reduction in ATP Cycle 7 regional funds, the OCTA plan is recommended for a partial award as there is insufficient funding for a full award. Plans are not included on the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety recommended contingency list as unfunded plans will be handled through the ATP Cycle 7 regional component, which will be developed in partnership with the six county transportation commissions and brought to the Regional Council in April 2025.

Table 2: 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety – Recommended Plans County  Applicant  Project Name  Funding
Request
Recommended
Funding
Percent of
Request
Los
Angeles
Cal State
University,
Dominguez Hills
CSUDH TDM Plan:

LA 28 and Beyond
$266,670  $266,670  100%
Orange  OCTA  Move OC: A Vibrant Path
to Active Transportation
$500,000  $400,000  80%
Total  $766,670  $666,670

Quick-Build Projects
Per the guidelines, the maximum quick -build project award is $900,000. Of the 21 quick -build applications evaluated, 11 quick -build projects are recommended for funding and five quick -build projects are recommended for the contingency list. The remaining five quick -build projects are not recommended for the contingency list as they generally did not propose eligible quick -build scopes of work. Table 3 summarizes the recommended quick -build projects. Several projects are Packet Pg. 26

Page 450 of 629 ends

REPORT

recommended for less funding than requested amount due to project components that would not use eligible quick-build materials or had requests exceeding the maximum award.

Table 3: 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety – Recommended Quick-Build Projects County  Applicant  Project Name  Funding
Request
Recommended
Funding
Percent of
Request
Los Angeles  Burbank
Safer Downtown Burbank
Mobility Network
Improvement Project
$900,000    $900,000   100%
Los Angeles  Covina
Covina Town Center
Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety
and Connectivity (Gap
Closure) Quick-Build
Roadway Project
$790,000    $790,000   100%
Los Angeles  Los Angeles
County
Norwalk Boulevard Vision
Zero Quick-Build Pedestrian
Safety Project
$803,000    $803,000   100%
Los Angeles  Monrovia  Monrovia Active Community
Travel Vinculum Phase II  $995,748    $900,000   90%*
Los Angeles  Montebello  Montebello CycleSafe Bridge
Project  $702,500    $362,500   52%**
Los Angeles  Pico Rivera  Pio Pico Bikeway Connector
Project  $900,000    $900,000   100%
Los Angeles  Santa Monica  Santa Monica Neighborhood
Greenways Project  $875,552    $875,552   100%
Orange  Westminster  City-wide Safe Routes to
Schools Quick-Build Project  $890,000    $445,000   50%** Riverside  Banning  Banning Two-Way Cycle
Track Safety Project  $895,000    $895,000   100%
San
Bernardino  Victorville  La Paz Dr. / Seneca Rd.

Traffic Circle  $503,700    $503,700   100%
Ventura  Port Hueneme  Rectangular Rapid Flashing
Beacons Citywide  $70,150    $70,150  100%
Total  $8,325,650  $7,444,902
*The recommended funding for the City of Monrovia reflects the maximum award amount of $900,000 for quick-build projects.
**The recommended funding for the City of Westminster and the City of Montebello reflects the proposed project components that are eligible quick-build elements.

Packet Pg. 27

Page 451 of 629 ends

REPORT

Quick-build projects that scored at least 70 out of 100 points are recommended for the contingency list as those applications proposed projects that met the quick -build criteria of conducting community engagement, using quick-build materials, and conducting evaluation. The remaining five quick-build projects are not recommended for the contingency list as the applications scored below the contingency list threshold and generally did not propose eligible quick -build scopes of work.

Table 4 summarizes the recommended quick-build contingency list.

Table 4: 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety – Recommended Quick-Build Project Contingency list
County  Applicant  Project Name  Request
Los Angeles  Los Angeles County  East Los Angeles Pedestrian Enhancements Project
$1,525,000*
Los Angeles  Los Angeles County  West Carson Pedestrian Safety Project   $1,175,000* Los Angeles  Montebello  Madison Avenue Neighborway  $442,400 Los Angeles  Pico Rivera  Walkable Uptown Pico Rivera  $900,000 San Bernardino  San Bernardino  City of San Bernardino Rectangle Rapid Flashing Beacons Installation Project
$399,000
*The Los Angeles County applications were submitted to the ATP Cycle 7 statewide component but were not selected for funding. If either of these projects are selected for funding through the contingency list process, they will be subject to the maximum $900,000 award outlined in the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Guidelines.

Table 5 summarizes the total number of projects and funding by county.

Table 5: 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Awards by County Plan Quick-Build Project Total
County Quantity Total Award Quantity Total Award Quantity Total Award Imperial 0 $- 0 $- 0 $-
Los Angeles 1 $266,670 7 $5,531,052 8 $5,797,722
Orange 1 $400,000 1 $445,000 2 $845,000
Riverside 0 $- 1 $895,000 1 $895,000
San Bernardino 0 $- 1 $503,700 1 $503,700
Ventura 0 $- 1 $70,150 1 $70,150
Total 2 $666,670 11 $7,444,902 13 $8,111,572

Next Steps
Upon Regional Council approval, staff will begin coordinating with quick -build project awardees to initiate the environmental clearance processes under the California Environmental Quality Act Packet Pg. 28

Page 452 of 629 ends

REPORT

(CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Staff will continue to collaborate with county transportation commissions on the development of the ATP Cycle 7 Regional Program, which will include the plans and quick-build projects funded with ATP Cycle 7 regional funds and infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects. The latest anticipated schedule is below:

2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety and 2025 ATP
Milestone
Anticipated Date
SCAG Regional Council approves the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Recommended Project List and Contingency List* December 5, 2024
SCAG Regional Council approves the ATP Cycle 7 Regional Program*  April 3, 2025 California Transportation Commission adopts the 2025 ATP Regional Program, including the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety projects*
June 26-27, 2025
2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety project initiation Summer/Fall 2025 *Projects selected to receive ATP funding are subject to approval by the SCAG Regional Council and California Transportation Commission as part of the adoption of the complete 2025 Regional ATP. In addition, projects receiving ATP funding will be subject to the programming and allocation process, requirements, and schedule of the Commission.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funding for staff work on this effort is included in the FY25 Overall Work Program (OWP) in projects 050.0169.06 Complete Streets: Active Transportation Program, 050.0169.11 Active Transportation Program, and 225.4955.01: Safe Streets and Roads for All.

ATTACHMENT(S):

1. PowerPoint Presentation - 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Projects

2. 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Recommended Project and Contingency List Packet Pg. 29

Page 453 of 629 ends

2024 Sustainable Communities Program
Active Transportation and Safety
Recommended Projects
Transportation Committee
December 5, 2024
Call Overview
•Following adoption of Connect SoCal 2024, Regional Council directed staff to release a call for applications through the Sustainable Communities Program (SCP) focused on
Active Transportation and Safetyfrom July 8 to September 27, 2024.
•Supports implementation of Connect SoCal 2024 mobility policies under Complete Streets, Transit and Multimodal Integration, and Safety.
2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation - 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Projects (2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety

Page 454 of 629 ends

Call Overview
•$8.2 million funded by:
oActive Transportation Program Cycle 7 Regional Funds
oFY23 Safe Streets and Roads for All Federal Grant
oSCAG State Matching Funds (due to ATP budget cuts)
•Project Types:
oCommunity/Areawide Plans: $500,000 maximum award
oQuick-Build Projects: $900,000 maximum award
2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety
Engagement Summary
Engagement Touch PointTimeframe
(2024)Reach
Feedback Surveyfor Guidelines DevelopmentMarch121 responses Public Commenton Draft GuidelinesApril9 comments
Presentationsto County Transportation
Commissions,Councils of Governments, SCAG Safe
and Active StreetsWorking Group
June –S e p t e m b e r20+ presentations
Application WorkshopsJuly, August2 workshops, 80
attendees
Office HoursJune –S e p t e m b e r30 sessions
Emails, Individual Meetings, and Phone Calls throughout the call process 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation - 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Projects (2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety

Page 455 of 629 ends

Application Summary
2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety
•Submissions from five
of six counties
oNo applications from
Imperial County, but
SCAG staff coordinated
with several prospective
applicants.
oPotential challenges
around identifying a lead
applicant and staff
capacity for project
delivery.
29 SCP Applications
•12 plans
•17 quick-builds
11 ATP Applications
•7 plans
•4 quick-builds
40 Total Applications
•19 plans
•21 quick-builds
2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Application Summary 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety
PlanQuick-Build ProjectTotal
County QuantityTotal
RequestQuantityTotal
RequestQuantityTotal
Request
Imperial 0$0 0$0 0$0
Los Angeles 5 $1.5M 11 $8.6M 16 $10M
Orange 6 $2.5M 1 $890K 7 $3.4M
Riverside 0$0 3 $1.6M 3 $1.6M
San
Bernardino1 $240K 1 $504K 2 $744K
Ventura 0$0 1 $72K 1 $72K
Total 12 $4.2M 17 $11.7M 29 $15.9M
Total SCP funding request approximately twice funding availability.

Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation - 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Projects (2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety

Page 456 of 629 ends

Recommended Plans
2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety
County ApplicantProject NameFunding
Request
Recommended
Funding
Los AngelesCal State University,
Dominguez Hills
CSUDH Travel Demand
Management Plan:

LA28 and Beyond
$266.67K $266.67K
Orange OCTAMove OC: A Vibrant Path to
Active Transportation$500K $400K*
Total$766.67K $666.67K
*Given the reduction in ATP Cycle 7 regional funds, the OCTA plan is recommended for a partial award as there is insufficient funding for a full award.

Recommended Quick-Build Projects
2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety
*Projects are not recommended full funding request due to ineligible project component(s) or the funding request exceeds the maximum award.

County ApplicantProject NameFunding
Request
Recommended
Funding
Los AngelesBurbankSafer Downtown Burbank
Mobility Network Improvement Project$900K $900K
Los AngelesCovinaCovina Town Center Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety and Connectivity (Gap Closure) Quick-Build Roadway Project$790K $790K Los AngelesLA CountyNorwalk Bl Vision Zero Quick-Build Pedestrian Safety Project$803K $803K Los AngelesMonrovia Monrovia Active Community Travel Vinculum Phase II $996K$900K* Los AngelesMontebelloMontebello CycleSafe Bridge Project$702.5K$362.5K* Los AngelesPico RiveraPio Pico Bikeway Connector Project$900K $900K Los AngelesSanta MonicaSanta Monica Neighborhood Greenways Project$875.6K$875.6K Orange Westminster Citywide Safe Routes to Schools Quick-Build Project $890K $445K* Riverside BanningBanning Two-Way Cycle Track Safety Project $895K$895K San
BernardinoVictorvilleLa Paz Dr. / Seneca Rd. Traffic Circle$503.7K$503.7K VenturaPort HuenemeRectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons Citywide$70.15K$70.15K Total$8.3M $7.4M
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation - 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Projects (2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety

Page 457 of 629 ends

Recommended Quick-Build Projects Contingency List
2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety
County ApplicantProject NameRequest
Los AngelesLos Angeles
County
East Los Angeles
Pedestrian Enhancements Project$1.53M*
Los AngelesLos Angeles
CountyWest Carson Pedestrian Safety Project $1.18M*
Los Angeles Montebello Madison Avenue Neighborway$442.4K Los Angeles Pico RiveraWalkable Uptown Pico Rivera$900K San
BernardinoSan BernardinoCity of San Bernardino Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons Installation Project$399K
*The LA County applications were submitted to the ATP Cycle 7 statewide component but were not selected for funding. If either of these projects are selected for funding through the contingency list process, they will be subject to the maximum $900,000 award outlined in the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Guidelines.
•Unfunded plans will be handled through ATP Cycle 7 Regional Program Contingency List. 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Award Summary PlanQuick-Build ProjectTotal
CountyQuantityTotal AwardQuantity Total AwardQuantityTotal Award Imperial 0 $-0$-0$-
Los Angeles 1 $266.67K 7$5.5M8 $5.8M
Orange 1 $400K 1$445K2 $845K
Riverside 0 $-1$895K1 $895K
San
Bernardino0 $- 1 $503.7K 1 $503.7K
Ventura 0 $-1$70.15K 1 $70.15K
Total 2 $666.67K 11$7.4M13 $8.1M
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation - 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Projects (2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety

Page 458 of 629 ends

Next Steps
2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety
2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety and 2025 ATP MilestoneAnticipated Date SCAG Regional Council approves the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Recommended Project List and Contingency ListDecember 5, 2024 SCAG staff work with quick-build awardees to initiate environmental clearance (CEQA/NEPA)
December 2024 –
March 2025
SCAG Regional Council approves the ATP Cycle 7 Regional ProgramApril 3, 2025 California Transportation Commission adopts the 2025 ATP Regional Program, including the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety projectsJune 26-27, 2025 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety project initiationSummer/Fall 2025 Recommended Actions
•Recommend the Regional Council approve the Connect SoCal 2024 Sustainable Communities Program Active Transportation and Safety Project List and Contingency List and authorize SCAG staff to fully fund awarded projects, and if applicable, any contingency projects, subject to the identification of additional funding.

Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation - 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Projects (2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety

Page 459 of 629 ends

For more information, please visit:

THANK YOU!
https://scag.ca.gov/sustainable-communities-program
Rachel Om, AICP
Senior Regional Planner
[email protected]
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: PowerPoint Presentation - 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Projects (2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety

Page 460 of 629 ends

2024 Sustainable Communities Program Active Transportation and Safety Recommended Project List and Contingency List Community/Areawide Plans
County Applicant Project Name Recommended Funding
Los Angeles Cal State University,
Dominguez Hills
CSUDH Travel Demand Management Plan:

LA 28 and Beyond $266,670
Orange Orange County
Transportation Authority
Move OC: A Vibrant Path
to Active Transportation $400,000
Quick-Build Projects
County Applicant Project Name Recommended Funding
Los Angeles Burbank Safer Downtown Burbank Mobility
Network Improvement Project $900,000
Los Angeles Covina
Covina Town Center Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety
and Connectivity (Gap Closure)
Quick-Build Roadway Project
$790,000
Los Angeles Los Angeles County Norwalk Boulevard Vision Zero Quick-Build Pedestrian Safety Project $803,000
Los Angeles Monrovia Monrovia Active Community Travel
Vinculum Phase II $900,000
Los Angeles Montebello Montebello CycleSafe Bridge Project $362,500 Los Angeles Pico Rivera Pio Pico Bikeway Connector Project $900,000 Los Angeles Santa Monica Santa Monica Neighborhood
Greenways Project $875,552
Orange Westminster City-wide Safe Routes to Schools
Quick-Build Project $445,000
Riverside Banning Banning Two-Way Cycle Track Safety Project $895,000 San
Bernardino Victorville La Paz Dr. / Seneca Rd. Traffic Circle $503,700 Ventura Port Hueneme Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons Citywide $70,150

Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Recommended Project and Contingency List (2024 SCP Active Transportation and

Page 461 of 629 ends

2024 Sustainable Communities Program Active Transportation and Safety Recommended Project List and Contingency List
2 Quick-Build Projects Contingency List
County Applicant Project Name Request
Los Angeles Los Angeles County East Los Angeles
Pedestrian Enhancements Project $1,525,000*
Los Angeles Los Angeles County West Carson Pedestrian Safety Project $1,175,000* Los Angeles Montebello Madison Avenue Neighborway $442,400 Los Angeles Pico Rivera Walkable Uptown Pico Rivera $900,000 San Bernardino San Bernardino City of San Bernardino Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons Installation Project $399,000
*The Los Angeles County applications were submitted to the ATP Cycle 7 statewide component but were not selected for funding. If either of these projects are selected for funding through the contingency list process, they will be subject to the maximum $900,000 award outlined in the 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Guidelines.

Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: 2024 SCP Active Transportation and Safety Recommended Project and Contingency List (2024 SCP Active Transportation and

Page 462 of 629 ends

REPORT

Southern California Association of Governments
December 5, 2024

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Approve up to $35,000 for memberships in 1) the Intelligent Transportation Society of America ($10,000) and 2) METRANS Transportation Consortium ($25,000).

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following Strategic P riority 2: Be a cohesive and influential voice for the region.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

At its November 19, 2024, meeting, the Legislative/Communications and Membership Committee (LCMC) approved up to $35,000 for memberships with 1) the Intelligent Transportation Society of America ($10,000) and 2) METRANS Transportation Consortium ($25,000).

BACKGROUND:

Item 1: The Intelligent Transportation Society of America Type: Membership Amount: $10,000

The Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS America), a nonprofit established in 1991, advocates for deploying Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) in the United States. Its mission is to advance the research and deployment of intelligent transportation technologies to save lives, improve mobility, increase accessibility and equity, promote sustainability, and improve efficiency and productivity. ITS America seeks to do this by convening leaders from the public and private sectors, academia, and research organizations to foster innovation. ITS America advocates for policies that support investment in ITS. The organization also conducts research, educates stakeholders, and spreads awareness of innovations in smart transportation technologies.

ITS America’s membership brings together the most influential voices from its 240+ members throughout 45 sectors ranging from state departments of transportation (DOT), metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), cities, transit, freight, start -ups, automakers, suppliers, academia, and more, including:

To: Executive/Administration Committee (EAC)
Regional Council (RC)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S

APPROVAL

From: David Angel, Legislative Affairs Analyst
(213) 630-1422, [email protected]
Subject: SCAG Memberships and Sponsorships
Packet Pg. 39

Page 463 of 629 ends

REPORT

− American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials − American Automobile Association (AAA)
− California Department of Transportation (CalTrans)
− HDR, Inc.
− HNTB
− Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
− Los Angeles County MTA
− Metropolitan Transportation Commission
− National League of Cities

The FY 25 dues for MPOs are $10,000, which includes the following benefits:

− Join leaders that drive and shape the discussion on a wide range of emerging mobility issues through ITS America’s Standing Advisory Committees;
− Receive weekly updates on federal, legislative, state, and local regulations in the Policy Rundown newsletter and participate in federal advocacy; − Discounted executive forum attendance fees, exhibit and conference discounts, and forum and policy roundtable speaking opportunities;
− Promote SCAG’s projects and accomplishments in the transportation ecosystem on ITS America’s digital media platforms, ITSABlog, and in the Momentum newsletter; and − Access to ITS America’s global network of ITS Professionals.

Item 2: The METRANS Transportation Consortium
Type: Membership Amount: $25,000

The METRANS Transportation Center operates through a partnership with the University of Southern California and California State University, Long Beach. METRANS focuses on solving the most pressing transportation problems facing large metropolitan regions, like the Los Angeles Metropolitan area, through interdisciplinary research, education, and outreach. METRANS facilitates collaboration between the University community, the private sector, and the public sector to study trends in goods movement and international trade and to discuss the latest updates, developments, and policies in the transportation sector.

SCAG staff is recommending that the agency retain membership at the “Silver” level, which will provide SCAG with the following:

− Membership on the METRANS Advisory Board
− Opportunities to propose special topical events related to current transportation issues Packet Pg. 40

Page 464 of 629 ends

REPORT

− Customized opportunities for student engagement and recruitment and METRANS approved/recommended intern for one semester
− Sponsorship acknowledgment and participation in the annual Careers in Transportation panel
− Feature article in various METRANS/CITT publications and online media − Admission to all METRANS events and VIP receptions, including four (4) complimentary admissions to the biennial International Urban Freight Conference (I-NUF) − Recognition on the METRANS website and other communication materials and at all METRANS events, including I-NUF, Town Hall meetings, and the annual Seminar Series

PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTION:

Staff presented the agenda item for up to $35,000 for memberships with 1) the Intelligent Transportation Society of America ($10,000) and 2) METRANS Transportation Consortium ($25,000) to the LCMC at its meeting on November 19, 2024. The LCMC approved this item unanimously as part of the consent calendar.

FISCAL IMPACT:
$35,000 for the Intelligent Transportation Society of America and METRANS Transportation Consortium memberships is included in the approved FY 24-25 Indirect Cost Budget.

Packet Pg. 41

Page 465 of 629 ends

REPORT

Southern California Association of Governments
December 5, 2024

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Receive and File

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following Strategic P riority 2: Be a cohesive and influential voice for the region.

STATE
California State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update The United States held the November 2024 General Election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, where all 80 California State Assemblymembers, half of the 40 State Senators, one U.S. Senator, and all 52 members of the House of Representatives were on the ballots of Californians. These contests also included ten statewide ballot measures and various local offices and local measures.

In the California State Legislature, twenty -four races were anticipated to be competitive, with eighteen in the Assembly and six in the Senate, including open seats and incumbent challenges, with thirteen intraparty contests. Due to term limits and close elections, 30 new legislators will be sworn in on December 2, 2024. First -time members of the legislature will be able to serve up to 12 years. Notably, SCAG Regional Council members Jose Luis Solache and Celeste Rodriguez won their contests to serve in the State Assembly . In addition, SCAG Energy and Environment Committee Member Nick Schultz also won election to the State Assembly . Cruz Strategies’ November 2024 General Election Update document contains more details about the election, which is attached to this staff report. Additionally, staff attached a memo detailing the results of local elections, which had candidates that serve on a SCAG board, as well as additional information on state and federal elections.

California State Auditor Conducts Audit of Housing Element Review Process At the request of Senator Steve Glazer (D -Contra Costa), approved unanimously at a Joint Legislative Audit Committee meeting, t he California State Auditor is auditing the state’s housing element review process. While the audit itself is limited to ten (10) cities that meet certain criteria, To: Regional Council (RC) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S

APPROVAL

From: David Angel, Legislative Affairs Analyst
(213) 630-1422, [email protected]
Subject: December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update Packet Pg. 42

Page 466 of 629 ends

REPORT

cities and counties are encouraged to provide comments and feedback to the auditor’s office regarding their experiences with the state’s housing element review process.

This audit will provide an opportunity to identify ways to improve the housing element review process and to allow local jurisdictions to express their individual experiences, which will be critical to helping the State Auditor understand the complexity of the housing element review process and the crucial need for more technical assistance, funding, and tools to allow local jurisdictions to plan for and accelerate housing production.

Local jurisdictions can participate in the audit by submitting comments about their experiences with the housing element review and the 6 th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) processes to [email protected].

Governor Newsom Announced a Second Special Session
Governor Gavin Newsom issued a proclamation convening a special session of the California Legislature to “safeguard California values and fundamental rights in the face of an incoming Trump administration.” The Governor noted that the special session would focus on making more legal resources available for the state to “protect civil rights, reproductive freedom, climate action, and immigrant families” and will start on Monday, December 2, 2024.

The Governor previously called a special session to address gas price spikes, adjourning after the legislature passed one bill allowing the state to require oil refiners to maintain higher reserve levels and authorizing the California Energy Commission to require refiners to plan for scheduled maintenance that can cause gas supplies and prices to fluctuate. In contrast to the special session regarding gas prices, Republicans in the State Legislature plan not to introduce any legislation in this upcoming special session, as legislation introduced as part of a special session must be limited to the issues outlined in the Governor’s proclamation.

FEDERAL
Congressional November 2024 General Election Update
The United States held the November 2024 General Election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, where all 80 California State Assemblymembers, half of the 40 State Senators, one U.S. Senator, and all 52 members of the House of Representatives were on the ballots of Californians. These contests also included ten statewide ballot measures and various local offices and local measures.

The election resulted in President -Elect Trump’s re -election as President of the United States and Senate Republicans taking control of the U.S. Senate, having flipped three seats, with an anticipated flip of a fourth seat at the time of writing this report. Republicans now control the Senate by an expected margin of 53 to 47. In California, Representative Adam Schiff won his contest for the U.S.

Senate seat for California . George Whitesides flipped Congressional District 27 in the House of Packet Pg. 43

Page 467 of 629 ends

REPORT

Representatives, defeating incumbent Representative Mike Garcia (R-Santa Clarita). In addition, Derek Tran is currently ahead of incumbent Representative Michelle Steel (R-Cypress) in District 45, though that race remained uncalled. House Republicans have clinched 218 House districts across the county to win a majority, while Democrats have 212. Five House districts remain uncalled by the Associated Press.

Federal Appropriations Bills Update
Congress began its October recess upon adjournment on September 27, 2024, as legislators were busy leading up to the November 2024 General Election. Both chambers reconvened to continue their business on November 12, 2024. Before the October recess, the House and Senate faced a September 30, 2024, deadline to pass all twelve appropriations bills before the end of the federal fiscal year or agree to a continuing resolution (CR) to avoid a government shutdown. Given that both parties and chambers are still not close to agreeing on a full budget, the House and Senate passed a CR on September 25, 2024, which would temporarily fund the federal government at current funding levels through December 20, 2024, with some additional funding included for the Secret Service. The CR passed on a 341 to 82 vote in the House and a 78 to 18 vote in the Senate, and President Biden signed it on September 26, 2024, just four days before the federal government would have shut down.

Congress must pass all 12 appropriations bills or an additional CR by the new December 20 deadline to avoid a government shutdown.

It remains improbable, however, that Congress will pass all 12 appropriations bills by the new deadline. It remains more likely that Congress will pass an additional CR to temporarily fund the government into 2025, which will be the first order of business for the new 119th Congress.

The House of Representatives previously approved five of its 12 appropriations bills in late July before the August recess, including the bills for Military Construction-Veterans Affairs, State-Foreign Operations, Homeland Security, Defense, and Interior -Environment. While the House took an additional vote to consider passage of the Legislative Branch appropriations bill in July, it failed by a margin of 205 to 215. At the time of writing this report, the Senate had yet to vote on any of the appropriations bills on the floor.

Packet Pg. 44

Page 468 of 629 ends

REPORT

Federal Notices of Funding Opportunities (NOFOs) Update In 2021, President Joe Biden signed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) into law. This bipartisan infrastructure law provides $1.2 trillion in total spending over five years, $110 billion of which is made available through competitive grant funding. These historic levels of investment in transportation grant programs have allowed areas in the SCAG region to apply for funding for critical infrastructure improvement projects.

Below is a current list of open NOFOs issued for transportation and sustainability -related competitive programs:

Program Deadline Agency
Regional Infrastructure
Accelerators (RIA) Program
January 9, 2025 U.S. Department of Transportation
Rebuilding American Infrastructure January 30, 2025 U.S. Department of Transportation Packet Pg. 45

Page 469 of 629 ends

REPORT

with Sustainability and Equity
(RAISE)
Promoting Resilient Operations for
Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-
Saving Transportation Program
(PROTECT)
February 24, 2025 Federal Highway Administration
Rural and Tribal Assistance Pilot
Program
Forecasted to open
November 2024
U.S. Department of Transportation
All Stations Accessibility Program Forecasted to open
November 2024
Federal Transit Administration
Reduction of Truck Emissions at
Port Facilities Program
Forecasted to open
December 2024
U.S. Department of Transportation
Port Infrastructure Development
Program
Forecasted to open
December 2024
U.S. Department of Transportation
Grid Resilience and Innovation
Partnerships (GRIP) Program
Forecasted to open
Fall 2024
U.S. Department of Energy

FISCAL IMPACT:

Work associated with the December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update is within the Indirect Cost budget, Legislation 810-0120.10.

ATTACHMENT(S):

1. Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update

2. SCAG 2024 General Election Memo
Packet Pg. 46

Page 470 of 629 ends

November 2024 General Election Update
As of: 11/13/24 at 3:30PM
The results of the 2024 General Election resulted in the victory of President Trump, Republican control of the Senate, and tight House margins. California leaders are already poised to again serve as the ‘resistance’ to D.C. On November 7, Governor Newsom called for a special session to “safeguard California values and fundamental rights in the face of an incoming Trump administration.The special session will focus on bolstering California legal resources to protect civil rights, reproductive freedom, climate action, and immigrant families.” The session is expected to open on December 2 parallel to the organizational session.

In the 2024 General Election, twenty-four legislative races were marked as competitive, with eighteen in the Assembly and six in the Senate. These included open seats as well as challenges to incumbents, and notably, thirteen of these were intraparty contests. Campaign spending reached new heights, with Independent Expenditure (IE) committees contributing close to $100 million.

State and county parties added over $25 million to the spending total.

In Sacramento, over 30 new legislators will be sworn in on December 2 and may serve up to 12 years. Not to be overlooked, Californians issued strong mandates on ballot measures from stricter public safety laws and support for school bonds and climate spending. They also showed restraint on spending by turning down local government efforts to pass bonds by a lower threshold.

Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 471 of 629 ends

As it stands, there will be 30 Democrats and 10 Republicans in the State Senate (Flip of 1 seat to the Republicans). In the Assembly, there will be 60 Democrats and 20 Republicans (flip of 2 seats to the Republicans).

Counties have until December 5 to certify their local election results, and the Secretary of State has until December 13 to certify statewide results. **Nearly 2 million ballots (13%) remain uncounted statewide at the time of this update.

November 5th, 2024 General Election Statewide Races
President of the United States:
★ KAMALA D. HARRIS (DEM)
★ DONALD J. TRUMP (REP)
United States Senate:
★ ADAM SCHIFF (DEM)
★ STEVE GARVEY (REP)
November 5th, 2024 General Election PROPOSITIONS
★ PROPOSITION 2 ($10B Schools Facilities Bond) PASSING
★ PROPOSITION 3 (Repeal Same-Sex Marriage Ban) PASSING
★ PROPOSITION 4 ($10 Climate Bond) PASSING
★ PROPOSITION 5 (Lower Threshold to Approve Certain Bonds) FAILED ★ PROPOSITION 6 (Ban Mandatory Prison Labor) FAILED
★ PROPOSITION 32 ($18/Hr Minimum Wage) FAILING
★ PROPOSITION 33 (Expand Rent Control) FAILED
★ PROPOSITION 34 (Restrict Spending by Certain Health Care Providers) PASSING ★ PROPOSITION 35 (MCO Tax) PASSING
★ PROPOSITION 36 (Increase Penalties for Theft/Fentanyl Crimes) PASSING Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 472 of 629 ends

November 5th, 2024 General Election Senate Races
The following is a list of all 20 odd-numbered Senate seats that are up for election in 2024:
● Incumbents are indicated with an (i) following their name. ● Candidates currently in the lead are bolded.
● Close races are highlighted.

Senate District 1:
★ MEGAN DAHLE (i) (REP)
★ DAVID FENNELL (REP)
Senate District 3:
★ THOM BOGUE (REP)
★ CHRISTOPHER CABALDON (DEM)
Senate District 5:
★ JIM SHOEMAKER (REP)
★ JERRY MCNERNEY (DEM)
Senate District 7:
★ JESSIE ARREGUÍN (DEM)
★ JOVANKA BECKLES (DEM)
Senate District 9:
★ TIM GRAYSON (DEM)
★ MARISOL RUBIO (DEM)
Senate District 11:
★ SCOTT WIENER (i) (DEM)
★ YVETTE CORKREAN (REP)
Senate District 13:
★ JOSH BECKER (i) (DEM)
★ ALEXANDER GLEW (REP)
Senate District 15:

Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 473 of 629 ends

★ DAVE CORTESE (i) (DEM)
★ ROBERT PAUL HOWELL (REP)
Senate District 17:
★ JOHN LAIRD (i) (DEM)
★ TONY VIRRUETA (REP)
Senate District 19:
★ ROSILICIE OCHOA BOGH (i) (REP)
★ LISA MIDDLETON (DEM)
Senate District 21:
★ S. MONIQUE LIMÓN (i)(DEM)
★ ELIJAH MACK (REP)
Senate District 23:
★ SUZETTE MARTINEZ VALLADARES (REP)
★ KIPP MUELLER (DEM)
Senate District 25:
★ SASHA RENÉE PÉREZ (DEM)
★ ELIZABETH WONG AHLERS (REP)
Senate District 27:
★ HENRY STERN (i)(DEM)
★ LUCIE VOLOTZKY (REP)
Senate District 29:
★ ELOISE GOMEZ REYES (DEM)
★ CARLOS A. GARCIA (REP)
Senate District 31:
★ SABRINA CERVANTES (i) (DEM)
★ CYNTHIA NAVARRO (REP)
Senate District 33:
★ LENA A. GONZALEZ (i)(DEM)
★ MARIO PAZ (REP)
Senate District 35:

Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 474 of 629 ends

★ LAURA RICHARDSON (DEM)
★ MICHELLE CHAMBERS (DEM)
Senate District 37:
★ JOSH NEWMAN (i)(DEM)
★ STEVEN 'STEVE' CHOI (REP)
Senate District 39:
★ AKILAH WEBER (DEM)
★ BOB DIVINE (REP)
November 5th, 2024 General Election Assembly Races
The following is a list of all 80 Assembly seats that are up for election in 2024 :
● Incumbents are indicated with an (i) following their name. ● Candidates currently in the lead are bolded.
● Close races are highlighted.

Assembly District 1:
★ HEATHER HADWICK (REP)
★ TENESSA AUDETTE (REP)
Assembly District 2:
★ CHRIS ROGERS(DEM)
★ MICHAEL GREER (REP)
Assembly District 3:
★ JAMIE 'JAMES' GALLAGHER (i)(REP)
★ AARON DRAPER (DEM)
Assembly District 4:
★ CECILIA M. AGUIAR-CURRY (DEM)
★ DARREN T. ELLIS (REP)
Assembly District 5:

Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 475 of 629 ends

★ JOE PATTERSON (i)(REP)
★ NEVA PARKER (DEM)
Assembly District 6:
★ MAGGY KRELL (DEM)
★ NIKKI ELLIS (REP)
Assembly District 7:
★ JOSH HOOVER (i)(REP)
★ PORSCHE MIDDLETON (DEM)
Assembly District 8:
★ GEORGE RADANOVICH (REP)
★ DAVID J. TANGIPA (DEM)
Assembly District 9:
★ HEATH FLORA (i)(REP)
★ TAMI NOBRIGA (AI)
Assembly District 10:
★ STEPHANIE NGUYEN (i)(DEM)
★ VINAYA SINGH (REP)
Assembly District 11:
★ LORI D WILSON (i)(DEM)
★ DAVE ENNIS (REP)
Assembly District 12:
★ DAMON CONNOLLY (i)(DEM)
★ ANDY PODSHADLEY (REP)
Assembly District 13:
★ RHODESIA RANSOM (DEM)
★ DENISE AGUILAR MENDEZ (REP)
Assembly District 14:
★ BUFFY WICKS (i)(DEM)
★ MARGOT SMITH (DEM)
Assembly District 15:

Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 476 of 629 ends

★ ANAMARIE AVILA FARIAS (DEM)
★ SONIA LEDO(REP)
Assembly District 16:
★ REBECCA BAUER-KAHAN (i)(DEM)
★ JOSEPH A. RUBAY (REP)
Assembly District 17:
★ MATT HANEY (i)(DEM)
★ MANUEL NORIS-BARRERA (REP)
Assembly District 18:
★ MIA BONTA (i)(DEM)
★ ANDRE SANDFORD (AIP)
Assembly District 19:
★ CATHERINE STEFANI (DEM)
★ DAVID LEE (REP)
Assembly District 20:
★ LIZ ORTEGA (i)(DEM)
★ SANGEETHA SHANBHOGUE (REP)
Assembly District 21:
★ DIANE PAPAN (i)(DEM)
★ MARK GILHAM (REP)
Assembly District 22:
★ JUAN ALANIS (i)(REP)
★ JESSICA SELF (DEM)
Assembly District 23:
★ MARC BERMAN (i)(DEM)
★ LYDIA KOU (DEM)
Assembly District 24:
★ ALEX LEE (i)(DEM)
★ BOB BRUNTON (REP)
Assembly District 25:

Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 477 of 629 ends

★ ASH KALRA (i)(DEM)
★ TED STROLL (REP)
Assembly District 26:
★ PATRICK AHRENS (DEM)
★ TARA SREEKRISHNAN (DEM)
Assembly District 27:
★ ESMERALDA SORIA (i)(DEM)
★ JOANNA GARCIA ROSE (REP)
Assembly District 28:
★ GAIL PELLERIN (i)(DEM)
★ LIZ LAWLER (REP)
Assembly District 29:
★ ROBERT RIVAS (i)(DEM)
★ J.W. PAINE (REP)
Assembly District 30:
★ DAWN ADDIS (i)(DEM)
★ DALILA EPPERSON (REP)
Assembly District 31:
★ JOAQUIN ARAMBULA (i)(DEM)
★ SOLOMON VERDUZCO (REP)
Assembly District 32:
★ VINCE FONG (i)(REP)
★ KEN WEIR (REP)
Assembly District 33:
★ ALEXANDRA MACEDO (REP)
★ XAVIER AVILA (REP)
Assembly District 34:
★ TOM LACKEY (i)(REP)
★ RICARDO ORTEGA (DEM)
Assembly District 35:

Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 478 of 629 ends

★ JASMEET BAINS (i)(DEM)
★ ROBERT ROSAS (REP)
Assembly District 36:
★ JEFF GONZALEZ (REP)
★ JOSE 'JOEY' ACUÑA JR (DEM)
Assembly District 37:
★ GREGG HART (i)(DEM)
★ SARI M. DOMINGUES (REP)
Assembly District 38:
★ STEVE BENNETT (i)(DEM)
★ DEBORAH 'DEB' BABER (REP)
Assembly District 39:
★ JUAN CARRILLO VENTURA (i)(DEM)
★ PAUL ANDRE MARSH (REP)
Assembly District 40:
★ PILAR SCHIAVO (i)(DEM)
★ PATRICK LEE GIPSON (REP)
Assembly District 41:
★ MICHELLE DEL ROSARIO MARTINEZ (REP)
★ JOHN HARABEDIAN (DEM)
Assembly District 42:
★ JACQUI IRWIN (i)(DEM)
★ TED NORDBLUM (REP)
Assembly District 43:
★ CELESTE RODRIGUEZ (DEM)
★ VICTORIA GARCIA (REP)
Assembly District 44:
★ NICK SCHULTZ (DEM)
★ TONY RODRIGUEZ (REP)
Assembly District 45:

Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 479 of 629 ends

★ JAMES C. RAMOS (i)(DEM)
★ SCOTT P. OLSON (REP)
Assembly District 46:
★ JESSE GABRIEL (i)(DEM)
★ TRACEY SCHROEDER (REP)
Assembly District 47:
★ GREG WALLIS (REP)
★ CHRISTY HOLSTEGE (DEM )
Assembly District 48:
★ BLANCA RUBIO (i)(DEM)
★ DAN T. TRAN (REP)
Assembly District 49:
★ MIKE FONG (i) (DEM)
★ LONG 'DAVID' LIU (REP)
Assembly District 50:
★ ROBERT GARCIA (DEM)
★ ADAM PEREZ (DEM)
Assembly District 51:
★ RICK CHAVEZ ZBUR (i)(DEM)
★ STEPHAN HOHIL (REP)
Assembly District 52:
★ JESSICA CALOZA (DEM)
★ FRANKY CARRILLO (DEM)
Assembly District 53:
★ MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ (DEM)
★ NICK WILSON (REP)
Assembly District 54:
★ MARK GONZALEZ (DEM)
★ JOHN K. YI (DEM)
Assembly District 55:

Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 480 of 629 ends

★ ISAAC G. BRYAN (i)(DEM)
★ KEITH G. CASCIO (REP)
Assembly District 56:
★ LISA CALDERON (i)(DEM)
★ JESSICA MARTINEZ (REP)
Assembly District 57:
★ EFREN MARTINEZ (DEM)
★ SADE ELHAWARY (DEM)
Assembly District 58:
★ CLARISSA CERVANTES (DEM)
★ LETICIA CASTILLO (REP)
Assembly District 59:
★ PHILLIP CHEN (i) (REP)
★ DAVE OBRAND (DEM)
Assembly District 60:
★ COREY JACKSON (i)(DEM)
★ RON EDWARDS (REP)
Assembly District 61:
★ TINA SIMONE MCKINNOR (i)(DEM)
★ ALFONSO HERNANDEZ (REP)
Assembly District 62:
★ JOSE LUIS SOLACHE (DEM)
★ PAUL JONES (REP)
Assembly District 63:
★ BILL ESSAYLI (i)(REP)
★ CHRIS SHOULTS (DEM)
Assembly District 64:
★ BLANCA PACHECO (i)(DEM)
★ RAUL ORTIZ JR. (REP)
Assembly District 65:

Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 481 of 629 ends

★ MIKE GIPSON (i)(DEM)
★ LYDIA GUTIERREZ (REP)
Assembly District 66:
★ AL MURATSUCHI (i)(DEM)
★ GEORGE BARKS (REP)
Assembly District 67:
★ SHARON QUIRK-SILVA (i)(DEM)
★ ELIZABETH 'BETH' CULVER (REP)
Assembly District 68:
★ AVELINO VALENCIA (i)(DEM)
★ MIKE TARDIF (REP)
Assembly District 69:
★ JOSH LOWENTHAL (i)(DEM)
★ JOSHUA RODRIGUEZ (REP)
Assembly District 70:
★ TRI TA (i)(REP)
★ IMMY D. PHAM (DEM)
Assembly District 71:
★ KATE SANCHEZ (i)(REP)
★ GARY KEPHART (DEM)
Assembly District 72:
★ DIANE DIXON (i)(REP)
★ DOM JONES (DEM)
Assembly District 73:
★ COTTIE PETRIE-NORRIS (i)(DEM)
★ SCOTTY PEOTTER (REP)
Assembly District 74:
★ LAURIE DAVIES (i)(REP)
★ CHRIS DUNCAN (DEM)
Assembly District 75:

Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 482 of 629 ends

★ CARL DEMAIO (REP)
★ ANDREW HAYES (REP)
Assembly District 76:
★ KRISTIE BRUCE-LANE (REP)
★ DARSHANA PATEL (DEM)
Assembly District 77:
★ TASHA BOERNER (i)(DEM)
★ JAMES BROWNE (REP)
Assembly District 78:
★ CHRIS WARD (i)(DEM)
Assembly District 79:
★ COLIN PARENT (DEM)
★ LASHAE SHARP-COLLINS (DEM)
Assembly District 80:
★ DAVID ALVAREZ (i)(DEM)
★ MICHAEL W. WILLIAMS (REP)
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Cruz Strategies - State Legislature November 2024 General Election Update (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 483 of 629 ends

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
900 Wilshire Blvd., St e. 1700, Los Angeles, CA 9 0017
T: (213) 236- 1800 www.scag.ca.gov

To: Kome Ajise, Executive Director and members of the Executive Team From: Kevin Gilhooley, Legislative Affairs Manager
Regarding: 2024 November General Elections

Versions:

November 12, 2024 – Updated at 1pm. Updates in red, below.

November 6, 2024 – Originally written.

Executive Summary:

The following elected officials will not return to the SCAG Regional Council after the November 2024 election:

 Imperial County Supervisor Luis Plancarte (did not run for re-election)

 Lynwood Mayor Jose Luis Solache (won election to State Assembly)

 San Fernando Councilmember Celeste Rodriguez (won election to State Assembly)

 Glendora Councilmember Gary Boyer (did not run for re-election)

 La Palma Mayor Marshall Goodman (term-limited)

 Buena Park Councilmember Art Brown (term-limited)

 San Bernardino City Councilmember Damon Alexander (failed to advance from the March primary election)

 Los Angeles Councilmember Paul Krekorian (term-limited)

The following elected officials were re-elected on Tuesday, November 5, 2024:

 Pico Rivera Mayor Andrew Lara – Re-elected. Currently at a comfortable second place in a vote for three out of five contest.

 El Segundo Mayor Drew Boyles – Re-elected. Currently in a comfortable lead in first place in a vote for three out of six contest.

 Santa Ana Mayor Valerie Amezcua – Re-elected. Currently at 60% of votes tallied.

MEMO
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: SCAG 2024 General Election Memo (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 484 of 629 ends

2  Brea Councilmember Marty Simonoff – Re-elected. Currently in comfortable second place in a vote for two out of four contest.

 La Quinta Councilmember Steve Sanchez – Re-elected. Currently in a comfortable first place lead for a vote for two out of three contest.

 Lake Elsinore Mayor Steve Manos – Re-elected. Currently at 64% of votes tallied.

 Victorville Mayor Liz Becerra – re-elected. Currently at 65% of votes tallied.

 Los Angeles Councilmember Heather Hutt – re-elected. Currently at 63% of the votes tallied.

The following elected officials were likely not re-elected on Tuesday, November 5, 2024:

 Los Angeles Councilmember Kevin de Leon – Lost. Currently at 43% of the votes tallied.

 Palm Desert Councilmember Kathleen Kelly – Lost. Currently in second place in a vote for one out of three contest.

 Irvine Councilmember Tammy Kim – likely lost. Currently in second place for a directly elected Mayoral position. ~5,000 votes behind current top vote-getter, Larry Agran.

MORE DETAIL ON LOCAL ELECTIONS IMPACTING SCAG ARE INCLUDED, AS FOLLOWS:

Imperial County:

Imperial County Supervisor Luis Plancarte chose not to run for re-election. The two candidates running to replace Supervisor Plancarte on the Board of Supervisors are separated by 30 votes out of more than 4,000 cast. The Imperial County Board of Supervisors will likely select its RC Member at its January 7, 2025 meeting.

Imperial County’s other two RC Members were not up for (re)election this year.

Los Angeles County:

RC Member and Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger won her re-election outright in the March Primary and was not impacted by the November election.

NB – NEW RC MEMBER: Former Los Angeles City Council President Paul Krekorian was termed out after 14 years in office. Krekorian’s city council district, which includes the East San Fernando Valley spanning from Toluca Lake to Van Nuys, will now be represented by ADRIN NAZARIAN, a former State Assemblymember from the same area.

Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: SCAG 2024 General Election Memo (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 485 of 629 ends

3 Los Angeles Councilmember HEATHER HUTT won re-election to Council District 10, which includes Koreatown, Mid-City, and West Adams. Hutt was appointed to the position in September 2022 after the previous District 10 representative, Mark Ridley-Thomas, was indicted on federal corruption charges.

NB – NEW RC MEMBER: Los Angeles Councilmember KEVIN DE LEON lost re-election to Council District 14, which includes Boyle Heights, Downtown Los Angeles, El Sereno, Highland Park, and Lincoln Heights. From a crowded primary race, which included eight candidates, Ysabel Jurado and De León had a close finish, with each getting about 24% and 23% of the votes, respectively.

Ultimately, Ysabel Jurado bested Councilmember de Leon 57% to his 43% and will become the new Councilmember for District 14.

RC Members JOSE LUIS SOLACHE (Lynwood) and CELESTE RODRIGUEZ (San Fernando) both won election to the State Assembly. These elections create vacancies for RC District 26 (Lynwood and Compton) and RC District 67 (San Fernando and Santa Clarita). Given the “gentleman’s agreement” for District 67 between the two cities, it’s likely that the next RC Member from District 67 will come from Santa Clarita. District 26 will require a district election in partnership with the Gateway Cities COG.

RC Member Mayor ANDREW LARA (Pico Rivera) won re-election to the Pico Rivera City Council.

RC Member Mayor DREW BOYLES (El Segundo) won re-election to the El Segundo City Council.

RC Member GARY BOYER (Glendora) decided not to run for re-election to the Glendora City Council. This will leave RC District 33 (Azusa, Baldwin Park, Covina, Glendora, and Irwindale) vacant.

Orange County:

Orange County Supervisor DON WAGNER won his re-election outright in the March Primary and was not impacted by the November election.

RC Member and Councilmember JON DIMITRU (Orange) ran unopposed for re-election to the Orange City Council.

RC Member and Mayor MARSHALL GOODMAN (La Palma) was termed out, which will leave RC District 18 (La Palma, Cypress, and Garden Grove) vacant. This will require an election in partnership with the Orange County COG.

RC Member and Councilmember ART BROWN (Buena Park) was termed out and will leave RC District 21 (Buena Park and Fullerton) vacant, requiring an election in partnership with the Orange County COG.

Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: SCAG 2024 General Election Memo (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 486 of 629 ends

4 RC Member and Councilmember TAMMY KIM (Irvine) lost the Mayoral election to the Irvine City Council. The election was not a “free ride,” as Councilmember Kim would have been up for re- election to the Council in 2024 anyway but ran for Mayor.

RC Member and Mayor VALERIE AMEZCUA (Santa Ana) won re-election to the Santa Ana City Council.

RC Member and Councilmember MARTY SIMONOFF (Brea) won re-election to the Brea City Council.

San Bernardino County:

RC Member and Councilmember DAMON ALEXANDER (San Bernardino) lost the March primary.

Though his current term did not end until December, his election loss will leave vacant RC District 7 (San Bernardino and Highland). This vacancy will require an election in partnership with the San Bernadino County Transportation Authority.

RC Member and Mayor LIZ BECERRA (Victorville) won re-election to the Victorville City Council.

RC Member and Mayor Pro Tem LARRY MCCALLON (Air Districts) was up for re-election to the Highland City Council but ran unopposed.

Riverside County:

RC Member and Councilmember KATHLEEN KELLY (Palm Desert) lost re-election to the Palm Desert City Council.

RC Member and Councilmember STEVE SANCHEZ (La Quinta) won re-election to the La Quinta City Council.

RC Member and Mayor STEVE MANOS (Lake Elsinore) won re-election to the Lake Elsinore City Council.

Ventura County:

RC Member and Ventura County Supervisor VIANEY LOPEZ won her re-election outright in the March Primary and was not impacted by the November election.

No other RC Members from Ventura County were on the ballot this cycle.

STATE LEGISLATIVE RACES:

Every two years, all 80 seats in the State Assembly and half of the 40 seats in the State Senate are up for election.

Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: SCAG 2024 General Election Memo (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 487 of 629 ends

5 Of the 80 Assembly seats up for election, 24 Assemblymembers will not return either because they are subject to term limits or because they chose not to run for re-election to the State Assembly. Of those 24 members not returning, the following 11 represented districts in the SCAG region:

 Wendy Carrillo (D) – AD 52 – has four years remaining.  Sabrina Cervantes (D) – AD 58 – running for Senate – has four years remaining  Laura Friedman (D) – AD 44 – running for Congress – has four years remaining  Eduardo Garcia (D) – AD 36 – has two years remaining
 Chris Holden (D) – AD 41 – due to term limits
 Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D) – AD 57 – due to term limits
 Anthony Rendon (D) – AD 62 – due to term limits
 Eloise Gomes Reyes (D) – AD 50 – running for Senate – has four years remaining  Luz Rivas (D) – AD 43 – running for Congress – has four years remaining  Freddie Rodriguez (D) – AD 55 – due to term limits
 Miguel Santiago (D) – AD 54 – has two years remaining

At this time, all incumbent Assemblymembers are ahead of their challengers except for the following:

 Greg Wallis (R) – AD 47 – Assemblymember Wallis trails his opponent, Palm Springs Councilmember Christie Holstege 49 to 51. UPDATE: Assemblymember Wallis now leads his opponent by 269 votes. It is very likely that the lead will bounce back and forth over the next few days as the last ballots are counted and rejected ballots are cured.

Before the Tuesday election, Democrats held 62 of the 80 seats. To maintain their super majority status of 2/3s, the Democrats needed to hold onto 54 seats in the Assembly and 27 seats in the State Senate. This allows them to pass urgency legislation or refer initiatives and constitutional amendments directly to the voters without any input or by-in from the Republican legislators.

While ballots are still be counted, there are two seats currently held by Democrats in which the Republican candidate is ahead. If these results hold, and Assemblymember Wallis continues to lead his Democrat opponent, this will result in a net gain of two seats for the Assembly Republican Caucus. The seats in question are:

 Assembly District 36 (Coachella Valley) – In this seat Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia had decided not to run for re-election.

 Assembly District 58 (Riverside) – In this seat Assemblymember Clarissa Cervantez ran (and won) a seat to the State Senate.

Of the 20 State Senate seats up for election this cycle, 12 districts will have new Senators. This is because 12 Senators were either termed-out or decided not to run for re-election. Of those 12, the following six are districts inside the SCAG region:

Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: SCAG 2024 General Election Memo (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 488 of 629 ends

6  Steve Bradford (D) – SD 35 – due to term limits
 Dave Min (D) – SD 37 – running for Congress – has eight years remaining  Janet Nguyen (R) – SD 36 – running for board of supervisors – has four years remaining  Anthony Portantino (D) – SD 25 – due to term limits
 Richard Roth (D) – SD 31 – due to term limits
 Scott Wilk (R) – SD 21 – due to term limits

That said, four sitting Assemblymembers were promoted to the Senate, which blunts the impact of the novice members. This includes the following two from the SCAG region:

 Eloise Gomez Reyes (D-San Bernardino)
 Sabrina Cervantez (D-Riverside)

At this time, all incumbent Senators are ahead of their challengers except for the following:

 Josh Newman (D) SD 37 – Senator Newman trails his opponent, former Assemblymember Steven Choi 48.7% to 51.3% . While Mayor of Irvine, Choi served on the SCAG Regional Council.

To maintain their super majority status of 2/3s, the Democrats needed to hold onto 27 seats in the State Senate. Before the election, the Democrats held 31 Senate seats. While ballots are still being counted, Senator Newman’s SD 37 is the only senate district in the SCAG region that could flip from one party’s control to the other. If this holds, this will result in a net gain of one seat for the Senate Republican Caucus. The only other close contest in the State Senate is between two Democrats, so the number of seats will not be affected by the final tabulation.

CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS:

Every two years, all 435 seats in the United States House of Representatives are up for election, including 52 seats in California. Of the 52 seats in California, 27 are represented by Members whose districts touch some part of the SCAG region. Of those 27, the following four will not be returning to the House:

 Tony Cardenas (D) CD 29 – retiring after six terms.
 Grace Napolitano (D) CD 31 – retiring after 12 terms.  Katie Porter (D) CD 47 – ran for U.S. Senate and lost the March 2024 primary.  Adam Schiff (D) CD 30 – running for U.S. Senate.

The SCAG region was home to several high-profile House elections. While there are many ballots yet to be counted, the Secretary of State’s office partially reports results as follows:

 Ken Calvert (R) CD 41 – Currently claiming 51.3% of the vote against former federal prosecutor, Will Rollins. The two men are separated by about 7,500 votes. This race has Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: SCAG 2024 General Election Memo (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 489 of 629 ends

7 been called by the Decision Desk for Calvert, but has not been called by the AP or the New York Times.

 Mike Garcia (R) CD 27 – LOST. Currently claiming 48.8% of the vote against former Virgin Galactic CEO, George Whitesides who took 51.2%. This race has not been called by the AP or New York Times, but Congressman Garcia has conceded the race to Mr. Whitesides.

 Michelle Steel (R) CD 45 – Currently claiming 50.7% of the vote against trial attorney and veteran, Derek Tran. With more than $46 million pouring into this Orange County-based seat, this was the single most expensive House race in the United States this cycle. Steel was a member of the SCAG Regional Council when an Orange County Supervisor.

 Open Seat CD 47 – Representative Katie Porter (D-Irvine) currently holds this seat, but ran for the U.S. Senate in the March 2024 primary instead of running for re-election to the House. The election to replace her was a contest between State Senator Dave Min (D- Irvine) and former Assemblymember Scott Baugh (R-Huntington Beach). Currently, Baugh trails Min 49.5% to 50.5%. The two men are separated by about 3,200 votes out of 306,600 cast.

Aside from Congressman Garcia, it appears that all other incumbent members of the House from California have won re-election. In addition, there is one other congressional district (outside the SCAG region) designated as a “Close Contest” by the Secretary of State’s office. This is a designation given to races in which there is less than a 2% difference between first and second place candidates.

Before the election, there were 220 House Republicans, 212 House Democrats, and three vacancies. Currently, the New York Times reports that the Republicans have retained at least 214 seats, the Democrats have retained at least 205 seats, and that 16 have yet to be called.

In addition, 34 of the 100 United States Senate seats were up for election. Known as “Class I” Senators, their terms ran from the beginning of the 116th Congress on January 3, 2019, to the end of the 118th Congress which will be on January 3, 2025. Senators in Class I were elected to office in the November 2018 general election, unless they took their seat through appointment or special election.

Of the 34 Senators up for election, one election is taking place to be the junior Senator from California.

 Adam Schiff (D) – Currently claiming 59% of the vote.

Senator-elect Schiff is a longtime member of the U.S. House of Representatives, and was first elected to the House in 2000. He bested Republican Steve Garvey, a 10-time Major League Baseball All-Star of the Los Angeles Dodgers and San Diego Padres.

Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: SCAG 2024 General Election Memo (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 490 of 629 ends

8 Before the election, there were 49 Republican Senators, 47 Democrat Senators, and four Independent Senators who caucus with the Democrats. Currently, the New York Times reports that there will be 52 Republican Senators, 45 Democrat Senators, two Independent Senators who caucus with the Democrats, and one race (Pennsylvania) that has not yet been called.

OTHER INTERESTING ELECTIONS:

 Former RC Member Deborah Robertson is losing re-election as Mayor of Rialto to former Congressman Joe Baca.

 Former RC Member Andrew Sarega lost election to the Anaheim City Council District #5.

Sarega had resigned as Mayor of La Mirada to run for city council in Anaheim.

 Former RC Member John Nielsen was re-elected to the Tustin City Council after having been off council for several years.

Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: SCAG 2024 General Election Memo (December 2024 State and Federal Legislative Update)

Page 491 of 629 ends

REPORT

Southern California Association of Governments
December 5, 2024

RECOMMENDED ACTION FOR CEHD, EEC, TC, AND RC:

Receive and File

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following Strategic P riority 1: Establish and implement a regional vision for a sustainable future.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The South Coast AQMD has initiated development of a CEQA guidance for evaluating cumulative impacts from air toxics for projects that are located within the South Coast AQMD’s jurisdiction and are not exempt from environmental reviews under CEQA. The CEQA guidance is an update to the existing South Coast AQMD’s cumulative analysis guidance that was developed in 2003. Based on the current proposed guidance, the project -level cumulative air toxics impact analysis, if approved and adopted as proposed, includes the most significant changes. South Coast AQMD staff is holding public workshops and meeting with stakeholders to encourage and seek input and will be preparing a preliminary draft of the proposed CEQA guidance document in coming months.

SCAG staff will continue to monitor the ongoing development of guidance and apprise members of SCAG’s Regional Council, Policy Committees, and stakeholders of major updates as appropriate.

BACKGROUND:

CEQA requires cumulative impacts analysis for non-exempt projects and defines cumulative impacts as “two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15355). South Coast AQMD is the resource agency with expertise in air quality and develops guidance on how to conduct air quality analysis for CEQA purposes.

To: Community Economic & Human Development Committee (CEHD) Energy & Environment Committee (EEC)
Transportation Committee (TC)
Regional Council (RC)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S

APPROVAL

From: Ryan Banuelos, Associate Regional Planner
(213) 630-1532, [email protected]
Subject: Status Update on the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidance for Evaluating Cumulative Impacts from Air Toxics
Packet Pg. 68

Page 492 of 629 ends

REPORT

The California Air Resources Board identifies diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions from diesel - fueled engines as a toxic air contaminant. In February 2022, South Coast AQMD staff initiated a public process for the development of new CEQA guidance on cumulative air quality impacts from air toxics (e.g., DPM) because the largest contributor to cancer risk from air pollution is DPM emissions. The development is intended to update South Coast AQMD’s existing cumulative analysis guidance, which was developed in 2003 and to serve as a tool to support CEQA lead agencies when they evaluate projects’ cumulative air toxics impacts pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. South Coast AQMD staff has held six public working group meetings to seek stakeholder feedback.

HIGHLIGHTS OF SOUTH COAST AQMD’S DRAFT CEQA GUIDANCE FOR CUMULATIVE IMPACTS FROM AIR TOXICS (DISCUSSED AT WORKING GROUP MEETING #6 ON NOVEMBER 6, 2024):

The draft guidance is currently proposed to focus on the operational phase of a project and applies to both regional projects and project -level analysis. The draft guidance includes revisions that may be relevant to project - or site-specific environmental reviews that are conducted by implementing agencies, as well as to environmental reviews for regional projects such as the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) when SCAG is a lead agency pursuant to applicable provisions of the CEQA. While South Coast AQMD staff has not developed a definition for regional projects, regional projects are expected to include plan-level documents such as master plans, general plans, and regional plans. The draft guidance for regional projects’ cumulative air toxics impact analyses is proposed to remain largely unchanged from the current analysis approach, which uses 10 in a million significance threshold for cancer risk to determine if cumulative air toxics impacts would be significant.

The draft guidance for project -level cumulative air toxics impact analysis, if approved and adopted as proposed, includes significant changes. The y would involve a multi -step process based on a number of project characteristics such as land use type, project size, location, and a project’s proximity to high volume diesel -fueled trucks and health sensitive populations within Senate Bill 535 disadvantaged communities and/or Assembly Bill 617 designated communities that are most impacted by air pollution. The project -level cumulative cancer risk significance threshold would range between one in a million and 10 in a million depending on the project’s background cancer risk from the South Coast AQMD’s Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES) plus various project - specific characteristics.

The draft guidance also states that linear projects such as bridge s, road s, and freeways (new or improvements) are medium cancer risk impact projects, and that major transportation projects (e.g., airport, port, railyard, bus/train station) are high cancer risk impact projects. Moreover, if regional projects have long-term construction activities, under the draft guidance, they could not be screened out from the cumulative air toxics impacts analysis because long -term construction activities take on characteristics of operational impacts. While the draft guidance would apply to all project types including transportation projects that are subject to CEQA within the South Coast Packet Pg. 69

Page 493 of 629 ends

REPORT

AQMD’s jurisdiction, warehouse and distribution center projects appear to be of particular concern due to DPM emissions from diesel -fueled trucks contributable to cumulative air toxics impacts and associated cancer risk.

If the draft guidance is adopted as proposed, non -exempt CEQA projects that have initiated their environmental review processes after the guidance becomes effective are subject to the new guidance. In addition, CEQA projects located within the South Coast AQMD’s jurisdiction or partially encompassing their jurisdiction are subject to the new guidance. CEQA projects located completely outside the South Coast AQMD’s jurisdiction are not subject to the new guidance. For more information on the draft guidance and other related materials, please visit South Coast AQMD website: https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/ceqa-policy-development-(new).

SCAG staff will continue to track the development and provide periodic status updates on major updates as appropriate. Cities, counties, and other agencies such as County Transportation Commissions (LA Metro, OCTA, RCTC, and SBCTA) and Caltrans Districts (Districts 7, 8, and 12) that may have future non -exempt CEQA projects within the South Coast AQMD’s jurisdiction are encouraged to participate in the South Coast AQMD’s development process.

NEXT STEPS:

South Coast AQMD staff will continue to hold public workshops and meetings with stakeholders to seek feedback on the draft guidance. In addition, South Coast AQMD staff will be preparing a preliminary draft of the proposed CEQA guidance document in coming months . At stakeholders’ request, South Coast AQMD staff is considering a public review and comment period for the preliminary draft guidance document and plans to provide an update to the Mobile Source Committee in early 2025 prior to seeking South Coast AQMD Governing Board approval and adoption.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Work associated with this item is included in the current Fiscal Year 2024 -25 Overall Work Program (24-020.0161.04: Environmental Compliance, Coordination and Outreach).

Packet Pg. 70

Page 494 of 629 ends

REPORT

Southern California Association of Governments
December 5, 2024

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Receive and File

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following Strategic P riority 1: Establish and implement a regional vision for a sustainable future . 2: Be a cohesive and influential voice for the region . 3: Spur innovation and action through leadership in research, analysis and information sharing . 4: Build a unified culture anchored in the pursuit of organizational excellence. 5: Secure and optimize diverse funding sources to support regional priorities.

BACKGROUND:

SCAG executed the following Purchase Orders (POs) for more than $5,000 but less than $500,000 in October 2024:

Vendor Description Amount
City Fare, Inc. Catering for the 2024 Demographic Workshop $11,169 Antelope Valley Partners for
Health
Traffic Safety Event in Lancaster $5,700

SCAG executed the following contracts for more than $25,000 but less than $500,000:

Consultant/Contract No. Description Amount
GoTo Communications, Inc.
25-015-C01

The vendor will continue to provide Voice over
Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephone services to
SCAG.

$128,026
To: Executive/Administration Committee (EAC)
Regional Council (RC)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S

APPROVAL

From: Cindy Giraldo, Chief Financial Officer
(213) 630-1413, [email protected]
Subject: Purchase Orders, Contract and Amendments below Regional Council’s Approval Threshold
Packet Pg. 71

Page 495 of 629 ends

REPORT

Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc.
24-043-C01
The vendor shall develop a Citywide Pedestrian
Access Plan, focusing on the priority community
of Edgemont, a Disadvantaged Community Area
(DAC) in the western portion of the City of
Moreno Valley.

$226,854
Iteris, Inc.
24-042-C01
The vendor shall provide services for a
Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant for the
City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works
Bureau of Street Services for the Warner Center
Active Transportation Hub project.

$477,077

ATTACHMENT(S):

1. Contract Summary 25-015-C01 (Info Item)

2. Contract Summary 24-043-C01 (Info Item)

3. Contract Summary 24-042-C01 (Info Item)
Packet Pg. 72

Page 496 of 629 ends

sh rev 03/02/23
CONSULTANT CONTRACT NO. 25-015-C01

Recommended
Consultant:

GoTo Communications, Inc.

See RFP
Background &
Scope of Work:

Under this agreement, GoTo Communications, Inc. will continue to provide Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephone services to SCAG. SCAG staff will continue to use this system to communicate with other staff, various partners, stakeholders, and community members, and it is essential to daily work. SCAG has used this provider for the past three years without issue.

See Contract SOW
Project’s Benefits
& Key Deliverables:

The project’s benefits and key deliverables include, but are not limited to:
• Provides various telephone services and features essential to daily work; • Integrates with existing systems, including Microsoft Teams Dialpad; • Ensures continuity through vendor provided soft phones; and • Provides a simple setup, easy to manage, and reliable system with necessary technical support.

PM must determine
Strategic Plan: This item supports SCAG’s Strategic Plan Goal 3: Spur innovation and action through leadership in research, analysis and information sharing.

See Negotiation Record
Contract Amount:

Total not to exceed $128,026

See Negotiation Record
Contract Period: January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2027 See Budget Manager
Project Number(s): 811-1163.08 $128,026

Funding source(s): Indirect Cost

Funding of $64,013 is available in the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Indirect Cost budget in Project Number 811-1163.08, and the remaining amount is subject to budget availability.

See PM/Score
Sheets/Selection Memo

Basis for Selection: In accordance with SCAG’s Procurement Manual (January 2021) Section 9.3 , to foster greater economy and efficiency, SCAG’s federal procurement guidance (2 CFR 200.318 [e]) authorizes SCAG to procure goods and services by using an Intergovernmental Agreement or Master Service Agreement (MSA). The goods and services procured under an MSA were previously competitively procured by another governmental entity. SCAG utilized an MSA with GoTo Communications via TIPS (Agreement No. 221003) that was competitively procured. This MSA is specifically designed for use by local agencies to leverage combined purchasing power for discounted volume pricing and qualification for services as provided by GoTo Communications, Inc.

Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Contract Summary 25-015-C01 (Info Item) (Purchase Orders, Contract and Amendments below Regional Council’s Approval

Page 497 of 629 ends

lxa
CONSULTANT CONTRACT NO. 24-043-C01

Recommended
Consultant:

Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc.

See RFP
Background &
Scope of Work:

The Consultant shall develop a Citywide Pedestrian Access Plan, focusing on the priority community of Edgemont, a Disadvantaged Community Area (DAC) that lies on the western portion of the City of Moreno Valley (City). They will identify the pedestrian routes to access major employment centers, shopping centers, regional transit centers, schools, and residential neighborhoods. They will also identify the non-Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant locations throughout the city and provide safe routes for pedestrians and other vulnerable road users such as people with disabilities, older adults, and children.

See Contract SOW
Project’s Benefits
& Key Deliverables:

The project’s benefits and key deliverables include, but are not limited to:
• Developing a pedestrian access plan to improve connectivity and walkability in the City of Moreno Valley;
• Enhancing accessibility to major destinations within the city; and • Promoting walking and biking via safe, efficient infrastructure that will provide environmental benefits and improve the overall health of the community members.

PM must determine
Strategic Plan: This item supports SCAG’s Strategic Plan Goal 1: Establish and implement a regional vision for a sustainable future.

See Negotiation Record
Contract Amount: Total not to exceed $226,854

Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc. (prime consultant) $149,421 Lemmon Planning LLC (subconsultant) $77,433
See Negotiation Record
Contract Period: October 31, 2024 through November 30, 2025 See Budget Manager
Project Number(s): 275-4823UC.08 $200,834
275-4823E.08 $26,020
Funding source(s): Senate Bill 1 (SB1), Transportation Development Act (TDA)

Funding of $226,854 is available in Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Overall Work Program (OWP) in Project Numbers 275-4823UC.08 and 275-4823E.08, and any unused funds are expected to be carried forward into FY 2025-2026, subject to budget availability.

See PRC Memo
Request for Proposal
(RFP):

SCAG staff notified 2,857 firms of the release of RFP 24-043-C01 via SCAG’s Solicitation Management System website. A total of 58 firms downloaded the RFP.

SCAG received the following three (3) proposals in response to the solicitation:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (1 subconsultant) $226,854

Woodsong Associates (1 subconsultant) $243,506
KTU&A (1 subconsultant) $244,955
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Contract Summary 24-043-C01 (Info Item) (Purchase Orders, Contract and Amendments below Regional Council’s Approval

Page 498 of 629 ends

lxa
See PRC Memo
Selection Process: The Proposal Review Committee (PRC) evaluated each proposal in accordance with the criteria set forth in the RFP and conducted the selection process in a manner consistent with all applicable federal and state contracting regulations. After evaluating the proposals, the PRC interviewed the three (3) offerors.

The PRC consisted of the following individuals:

Anikka Van Eyl, Associate Regional Planner, SCAG
Guadalupe Cortes, Associate Engineer, City of Moreno Valley Wei Sun, Principal Engineer/City Traffic Engineer, City of Moreno Valley See PM/Score
Sheets/Selection Memo

Basis for Selection: The PRC recommended Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the contract award because the Consultant:
• Demonstrated the best understanding of the project; specifically, the Consultant has prior experience working with the City of Moreno Valley and strong prior experience with active transportation plans with a focus on pedestrian access and transportation safety. Their proposal clearly demonstrated their understanding of the importance of focusing on the Edgemont Community, and the specific needs from the context of this disadvantaged community.
• Provided the best technical approach, for example, the Consultant proposed using PublicCoordinate to capture resident input as well as hosting a larger outreach event such as their prior work with the Bakersfield Active Transportation Summit and Festival to get more engagement. The ir proposal provided a strong example of what the project website would look like and how it makes it easy for residents to engage both in person and online. The Consultant proposed using Replica and other traffic engineering prog rams to support their technical analysis. Although other proposals proposed using other types of technical analysis, the Consultant had the proposal with the best balance of in-depth local knowledge, extensive safety and active transportation experience. Finally, the project schedule is well thought through, with tasks and milestones clearly detailed in their proposed schedule, with t wo months built in for contingency.
• Proposed the lowest price and lowest number of hours to perform the work.

The rates and hours proposed by the Consultant were reasonable and appropriate for the scope of work. Project costs are realistic given the workload and timeline and have been carefully considered through clear project management and workload scheduling. The Consultant team’s extensive experience ensures the project will deliver on time and under budget.

Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Contract Summary 24-043-C01 (Info Item) (Purchase Orders, Contract and Amendments below Regional Council’s Approval

Page 499 of 629 ends

rml
CONSULTANT CONTRACT NO. 24-042-C01

Recommended
Consultant:

Iteris, Inc.

See RFP
Background &
Scope of Work:

The Consultant shall provide services for a Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant funded by Caltrans through Senate Bill 1 funds for the City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works – Bureau of Street Services (StreetsLA) for the project, “Linking Warner Center as an Active Transportation Hub to Jobs and Housing” (Warner Center Active Transportation Hub). Specifically, the Consultant shal l identify barriers to walking and biking, identify the top 20 priority corridors, and develop active transportation design prototypes for typical roadways in the Warner Center (WC) area. The Consultant shall identify ways to coordinate and leverage future funding strategies, including the WC Specific Plan’s Mobility Fee, and create a funding strategy to implement the top three priority corridors. The Consultant shall engage the community throughout the project and advance the top 3 priority projects to 30% Design Development (DD) with cost estimates. The outcome of this project will be a community-driven active transportation plan.

See Contract SOW
Project’s Benefits
& Key Deliverables:

The project’s benefits and key deliverables include, but are not limited to:

• Expand transit accessibility by proposing innovative , context-informed roadway designs for Warner Center, which would enhance overall active transportation connectivity.
• Implement climate-resilient and safe streets to walk, bike, and roll to essential neighborhood and regional destinations and services.
• Promote a community -informed and inclusive decision -making process that engages a broad range of community stakeholders of all ages and abilities in developing the Warner Center active transportation plan. • Facilitate transit investment and implementing multi-modal transit options that decrease Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT), reduce greenhouse gases (GHG), and improve air quality.

PM must determine
Strategic Plan: This item supports SCAG’s Strategic Plan Priority #1 : Establish and implement a regional vision for a sustainable future.

See Negotiation Record
Contract Amount: Total not to exceed $477,077

Iteris, Inc. (prime consultant) $245,474
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. (subconsultant) $103,821
Katherine Padilla & Associates, Inc.(subconsultant) $82,032 Armen Hovanessian Transportation Consulting, Inc (subconsultant) $45,750

Note: Iteris, Inc. originally proposed $486,339, but staff negotiated the price down to $477,077 without reducing the scope of work.

See Negotiation Record
Contract Period: October 29, 2024 through February 28, 2026 See Budget Manager
Project Number(s): 275.4823UC.08 $422,357
275.4823E.03 $54,720
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Contract Summary 24-042-C01 (Info Item) (Purchase Orders, Contract and Amendments below Regional Council’s Approval

Page 500 of 629 ends

rml
Funding source(s): SB 1 Sustainable Communities (SC) Formula and Transportation Development Act (TDA)

Funding of $477,077 is available in the FY 2024-25 OWP budget in Project Number 275.4823.08, and any unused funds are expected to be carried forward into future fiscal year budget(s), subject to budget availability.

See PRC Memo
Request for Proposal
(RFP):

SCAG staff notified 2,155 firms of the release of RFP 24-042 via SCAG’s Solicitation Management System website. A total of 54 firms downloaded the RFP . SCAG received the following two (2) proposals in response to the solicitation:

Iteris, Inc. (3 subconsultants) $486,339

Here Design Studio LLC. – list lowest to highest (1 subconsultants) $348,672

Although staff only received two (2) proposals, staff proceeded with the evaluation process given:
• The solicitation process and requirements were not overly restrictive; • We adequately advertised the procurement from May 17th to June 18th (i.e., our normal 28 days); and
• The two (2) firms that responded could perform the scope of work.

Staff believed that re-soliciting was not likely to yield a different result and needed to maintain the project’s schedule, therefore, proceeded to evaluate the two offers received.

See PRC Memo
Selection Process: The Proposal Review Committee (PRC) evaluated each proposal in accordance with the criteria set forth in the RFP and conducted the selection process in a manner consistent with all applicable federal and state contracting regulations . After evaluating the proposals, the PRC did not conduct interviews because the proposals contained sufficient information on which to base a contract award.

The PRC consisted of the following individuals:

Lyndsey Nolan, Senior Regional Planner (Project Manager), SCAG Nina Phinouwong, Landscape Architectural Associate, City of Los Angeles Mark Wissa, Civil Engineer, City of Los Angeles
See PM/Score
Sheets/Selection Memo

Basis for Selection: The PRC recommended Iteris for the contract award because the consultant:
• Demonstrated the best understanding of the project; specifically, the consultant team has extensive background knowledge of the project due to their involvement with previous work on the Warner Center Specific Plan (WC2035) and their familiarity with the a ssociated engagement work / stakeholder groups. Their proposal discussed the context for this project including how it will build on previous WC2035 work and how it relates to the City’s Mobility Fee Nexus Study. This demonstrates a strong understanding of why StreetsLA initiated this project, which is to equitably complete the active transportation portion of the Specific Plan. In addition, their approach makes clear the Prime's understanding that the intent of the Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Contract Summary 24-042-C01 (Info Item) (Purchase Orders, Contract and Amendments below Regional Council’s Approval

Page 501 of 629 ends

rml
project is to translate the active transportation plan into funded grant/implementable projects.
• Provided the best technical approach; for example, the Prime proposed a potential framework to evaluate the top 20 projects and demonstrated an intent to acknowledge and build upon the ongoing efforts existing under the WC 2035 Specific Plan. The proposal provides a good explanation as to who and how the T echnical Advisory Committee (TAC) /Community Advisory Committee (CAC) committees will be selected, identified stakeholder groups in area, and provided project milestones. The roles of the Prime and Sub are well coordinated / integrated, particularly how the consultants will connect Task 3 (Engagement) to Tasks 4 (Project Pr ioritization, Concept Designs, and Implementation) and 5 (Final Plan) to ensure community and stakeholder preferences inform the outcomes of the project. Finally, the project schedule is well thought through, with tasks and milestones divided into five-month increments.
• Provided the best overall value for the level of effort proposed. Though Iteris did not propose the lowest price, the PRC selected the firm’s proposal because of the value the firm will bring to this project. The rates and hours proposed by Iteris are appr opriate for this project scope. The consultant team highlighted their technical and outreach expertise that can support the project’s needs. Project costs are more realistic given workload and timeline and reflects more diverse array of staff levels and backgrounds such as planners, principal engineers, engineers, landscape architects, advisors, outreach specialists, and accountants.

Although another firm proposed a lower price, the PRC did not recommend this firm for contract award because this firm:
• Did not clearly demonstrate a sufficient level of effort, primarily in the form of staff hours, to satisfactorily complete the tasks in the Scope of Work; and • Did not demonstrate a strong level of understanding around the project context and background, and did not elaborate on technical approach other than re-stating language from the RFP. For example, their proposal did not describe how this project will build on WC2035. In Task 2 (Existing Conditions Analysis), it did not elaborate on what existing conditions to account for or assess. It also underestimated the amount of time it would take to complete key tasks such as recruiting TAC/CAC members and completing 30% DD work. Further, the proposal did not provide an explanation, strategies, or approach on how they would accomplish those tasks on such an aggressive timeline.

Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Contract Summary 24-042-C01 (Info Item) (Purchase Orders, Contract and Amendments below Regional Council’s Approval

Page 502 of 629 ends

REPORT

Southern California Association of Governments
December 5, 2024

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Receive and File

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following Strategic Priority 5: Secure and optimize diverse funding sources to support regional priorities.

ACCOUNTING:

Membership Dues
As of October 31, 2024, 187 cities, 6 counties, 7 commissions, and 11 tribal governments have paid their FY25 membership dues. SCAG has collected $2.72M out of $2.76M billed. This represents

98.44% of the membership assessment.

Investments & Interest Earnings
As required by SCAG’s investment policy adopted by the Regional Council in July 2018, staff will provide a monthly report of investments and interest earnings. As of October 31, 2024, SCAG has invested $27.09 million in the LAIF account and has earned $283,157.66 in interest income. The interest earnings are distributed on a quarterly basis with an average interest rate of 4.51%.

Additionally, SCAG has opened a Money Market Account to maximize interest income while monitoring the REAP’s funding balance, interest earnings from this account are distributed monthly.

As of October 31, 2024, SCAG has invested $45.50 million in the Money Market Account and has earned $812,286.06, in interest income.

BUDGET & GRANTS (B&G):

The Executive/Administration Committee (EAC) and the Regional Council (RC) approved Amendment 1 to the FY 2024 -25 (FY25) Comprehensive Budget including the FY 25 Overall Work Program (OWP), in the amount of $30,867,046, increasing the FY 25 Comprehensive Budget from $403.7 million to $434.6 million. The Amendment 1 to the FY25 OWP was submitted to Caltrans for approval.

To: Executive/Administration Committee (EAC)
Regional Council (RC)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S

APPROVAL

From: Cindy Giraldo, Chief Financial Officer
(213) 630-1413, [email protected]
Subject: CFO Monthly Report
Packet Pg. 79

Page 503 of 629 ends

REPORT

In November, B&G staff analyzed the budget requests for FY 2025-26 (FY26) Comprehensive Budget and OWP. The preliminary analysis and data were shared with the Executive Team and divisional budget meetings were held to discuss the FY26 Work Plans and priorities. A draft FY26 Comprehensive Budget and OWP will be presented to the EAC and RC in March 2025.

Lastly, staff worked on finalizing the 2019 Regional Early Action Planning Program (REAP 1.0) close - out report, reconciled the expenditures, and submitted the close -out report as well as the final billing to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) this month.

SCAG recently published a REAP 1.0 project list that details investments by county in the SCAG region to highlight work completed.

CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATION:

In October, the Contracts Administration Department staff supported 14 formal procurements and 191 active contracts and issued 21 purchase orders for active agreements. In this month’s consent calendar agenda item, “Purchase Orders, Contracts, and Amendments below Regional Council’s Approval Threshold,” staff reports executing three (3) contracts and issuing two (2) purchase orders to support ongoing business operations.

On October 10, 2024, SCAG submitted the semi -annual Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Utilization Report for the period of April -September 2024 to the Caltrans Office of Regional and Community Planning, Contracts and Audit Compliance. SCAG reported the following:

• Awarded two (2) federal -aid contracts totaling $3.9 million, of which 62% was awarded to DBEs.
• Made payments for 20 federal -aid contracts totaling $1.5 million, of which 34% was paid to DBEs.
• Completed six (6) federal-aid contracts totaling $2.7 million, of which 47% went to DBEs.

Packet Pg. 80

Page 504 of 629 ends

REPORT

Southern California Association of Governments
December 5, 2024

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Information Only – No Action Required

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The “2024 Southern California Economic Update” will be presented during the December 5th SCAG Regional Council meeting alongside regular SCAG business. The update will present SCAG’s annual economic analysis and near -term outlook from SCAG’s Economic Roundtable, followed by an in - depth discussion on the state of the economy among Regional Council members.

BACKGROUND:

Each year since 2009, SCAG has hosted the Southern California Economic Summit, an event designed to provide up -to-date regional and county -specific economic analysis and insights to stakeholders. Due to scheduling conflicts with multiple holidays over 2024 -2025, this year SCAG will provide a shorter Southern California Economic Update as part of the December 2024 Regional Council meeting alongside regular SCAG business.

The 2024 Southern California Economic Update will present a detailed economic outlook for the region, highlighting that growth in sectors such as goods movement, healthcare, and tourism will drive the economy in the coming year.

The Economic Roundtable is a select group of economists from across the region who meet quarterly to discuss trends, data, and current events impacting the region’s economy. Not surprisingly, a group of seven economists will have different perspectives on issues, causes, and outlooks. Recognizing this, the objective of the Economic Roundtable is to provide common, consensus-based understanding of regional economic data, trends, and themes affecting regional To: Regional Council (RC) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S

APPROVAL

From: Kevin Kane, Principal Planner
(213) 236-1828, [email protected]
Subject: Southern California Economic Update
Packet Pg. 81

Page 505 of 629 ends

REPORT

planning. The roundtable’s Quarterly Reports can be found on SCAG’s Economic and Demographic page and all accompanying economic data for the region can be visualized on and exported from the SCAG Econ Trends Tool. Roundtable members include:

• IMPERIAL COUNTY: Michael Bracken, Managing Partner & Chief Economist, Development Management Group, Inc.
• LOS ANGELES COUNTY: Shannon Sedgwick, Director of the Institute for Applied Economics, Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation
• ORANGE COUNTY: Wallace Walrod, Chief Economic Adviser, Orange County Business Council
• RIVERSIDE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES: Manfred Keil, Chief Economist, Inland Empire Economic Partnership and Claremont McKenna College
• VENTURA COUNTY: Mark Schniepp, Director, California Economic Forecast • SUSTAINABILITY: David Roland -Holst, Managing Director, Berkeley Economic Advising & Research
• EQUITY: Beth Tamayose, Research Director, University of California, Riverside School of Public Policy
• ECONOMIC UPDATE MODERATOR: Kate Gordon, CEO, California Forward

SCAG’s primary role as a metropolitan planning organization is to develop a plan for a healthy, prosperous, accessible, connected, and equitable Southern California. To that end, Connect SoCal 2024, SCAG’s quadrennial Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy, was adopted by the Regional Council in 2024. The objective of this Economic Update is to provide a review of the past year and outlook for the next year is to assist policymakers in planning for the next 30 years.

The Economic Summit’s traditional “Briefing Book” is provided under separate cover. It contains the written overview and outlook for the SCAG region and a summary of its six counties and short essays from roundtable members covering region -wide economic sustainability and equity. Full reports for the region’s counties will also be provided as a resource.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Staff coordination and economic roundtable consultant tasks are funded through SCAG Overall Work Program Item 055-1531.01, Southern California Economic Growth Strategy.

Packet Pg. 82

Page 506 of 629 ends

REPORT

Southern California Association of Governments
December 5, 2024

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Information Only – No Action Required

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following Strategic P riority 2: Be a cohesive and influential voice for the region.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Holland & Knight, SCAG’s federal lobbyist, will provide a broad overview of the 2024 General Election results, as well as what to expect from Washington, D.C., as there has been a significant shift in the balance of power after the election.

BACKGROUND:

The United States held the November 2024 General Election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, where all 80 California State Assemblymembers, half of the 40 State Senators, one U.S. Senator, and all 52 members of the House of Representatives were on Californians’ ballots. These contests also included ten statewide ballot measures and various local offices and local measures.

The election resulted in former President Donald Trump’s re -election as President of the United States and Senate Republicans taking control of the U.S. Senate, having flipped three seats, with an anticipated flip of a fourth seat at the time of writing this report. Thus, Republicans now control the Senate by an expected margin of 53 to 47. House Republicans retained a bare majority of 218 seats and Democrats held onto 212. At deadline, five races for the House of Representatives remain uncalled, with votes still being tabulated in Alaska, California, Iowa, and Ohio.

Holland & Knight, SCAG’s federal lobbyist, will provide a federal update and overview of the 2024 General Election results. Tom Davis, Partner, Leslie Pollner, Senior Policy Advisor, and Lauri Hettinger, Senior Policy Advisor, will join us from H&K to present.

Below are the biographies of each speaker:

To: Regional Council (RC) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S

APPROVAL

Subject: Federal Elections Update
Packet Pg. 83
From: David Angel, Legislative Affairs Analyst
(213) 630-1422, [email protected]

Page 507 of 629 ends

REPORT

Tom Davis, Partner
Tom Davis is a Washington, D.C., attorney who focuses his practice on handling various congressional and regulatory affairs, including congressional investigations, land use, and legislative strategy. Mr. Davis is a co -leader of the Public Policy & Regulation Group’s Congressional Investigations Team.

Mr. Davis served 14 years in the U.S. House of Representatives, representing the 11th Congressional District of Virginia. He served as chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform from 2003 to 2007, where he led a number of high -profile investigations. In addition, Mr. Davis was elected chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee and served in that role from 1999 to 2002. When he joined Congress, Mr. Davis was the first freshman representative in 50 years to hold a subcommittee chairmanship, taking the gavel of the Subcommittee on the District of Columbia. Mr. Davis also served as a supervisor on the Fairfax County (Va.) Board of Supervisors from 1980 to 1994, and as the board chairman from 1991 to 1994.

Prior to joining Holland & Knight, Mr. Davis was managing director of the Government Relations Office at Deloitte, where he advised the consulting side of the firm and its clients in its efforts to develop business with governmental clients. Mr. Davis also served 14 years as general counsel for a publicly held professional services firm in McLean, Virginia, up until his election to Congress.

Mr. Davis has served as a director on the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) where, as vice chairman, he oversaw the construction of Phase I of Metrorail to Dulles Airport and helped procure the funding agreement for Phase II. He currently serves as Rector (chairman of the Board of Visitors) at George Mason University, where he is also a distinguished professor of Public Policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government.

Mr. Davis also has authored numerous thought pieces in The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and The Hill on the workings of Congress and other governmental issues. He also has appeared as a commentator on various television news and entertainment programs, including “Meet the Press,” “Fox News Sunday Show” (power player of the week), MSNBC, CNN, and the “Bill Maher Show.” Mr.

Davis completed a B.A. at Amherst College and a J.D. at the University of Virginia School of Law.

Leslie Pollner, Senior Policy Advisor
Leslie Pollner is co-leader of Holland & Knight’s Local Government Advocacy Team and a member of the firm’s Public Policy & Regulation Group. Ms. Pollner focuses on several key industries, including transportation, economic development, and housing. Her extensive experience in government at both the federal and local levels allows her to help clients develop innovative solutions and advocacy strategies to achieve results.

Packet Pg. 84

Page 508 of 629 ends

REPORT

Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Pollner was the deputy mayor for federal affairs in Los Angeles under Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. She led the city of Los Angeles’ office in Washington, D.C., directed its federal advocacy efforts, and managed lobbying teams at the Los Angeles port, airport and public utilities commissions. Ms. Pollner was also the principal liaison with the U.S. Conference of Mayors, while Mayor Villaraigosa was the organization’s president and worked with mayors across the country on key issues, including building a coalition to support the transportation reauthorization bill.

Prior to that, Ms. Pollner was a two -time chief of staff for U.S. Reps. Suzanne Kosmas and Tim Mahoney, both of Florida. She has also worked in public affairs consulting and crisis communications support for Fortune 500 companies and helped develop communications strategies for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, concentrating on the nonprofit’s education investments.

Lauri Hettinger, Senior Policy Advisor
Lauri Hettinger is a senior policy advisor in the Public Policy & Regulation Group in the Washington, D.C., office of Holland & Knight. Ms. Hettinger advocates for local government municipalities’ and industry’s infrastructure needs, including surface transportation, water resources, economic development, and Army Corps of Engineers.

Prior to joining Holland & Knight, Ms. Hettinger served as staff director for the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure Ranking Member, George Voinovich (R-OH). In this role, she served as his primary advisor on transportation, water infrastructure, environment, Army Corps of Engineers, and economic development. Ms.

Hettinger also served as a legislative assistant to Senator Norm Coleman (R -MN), handling his infrastructure, environment, energy, and appropriations issues. During the 2002 election cycle, Ms.

Hettinger was a senior research analyst for the National Republican Senatorial Committee. She started her legislative career in the office of Senator Strom Thurmond as a legislative correspondent.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Work associated with the Federal Election Update is contained in the Indirect Cost budget, Legislation 810-0120.10.

Packet Pg. 85

Page 509 of 629 ends

ITEM # 19

CITY OF MONTEBELLO

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: Raul Alvarez, City Manager

BY: Fernando Pelaez, Fire Chief

SUBJECT: APPROVE ISSUING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NO. 25-09 FOR

FIRE DEPARTMENT COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGIC PLAN

CONSULTING SERVICES

DATE: February 12, 2025

RECOMMENDATIONS:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Authorize issuing Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 25-09 for comprehensive strategic plan consulting services for the Fire Department; and

2. Take such additional, related action that may be desirable.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The solicitation of the RFP for this service poses no fiscal impact on the adopted budget.

Upon review of the proposals, staff will return to the City Council to award an agreement and, if necessary, recommend budget amendments at that time.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The Fire Department is requesting to seek proposals from highly qualified consultants to prepare and develop a comprehensive strategic plan for the Montebello Fire Department.

The consultant shall have expertise in the areas of public safety, fire service operations, and organizational strategy to assist the department in evaluating current capabilities, future needs, and achievable goals. The strategic plan will serve as the roadmap for the department to meet community needs, address operational challenges, and plan for future growth/expansion.

The Request for Proposal (RFP) timeline is presented below:

Page 510 of 629 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Page 2 of 2 ends

Release RFP Thursday, February 13, 2025 Online Q&A Deadline Tuesday, March 11, 2025,11 a.m. PST Deadline to Submit Responses Wednesday, March 26, 2025, at 11 a.m. PST City Review of Submissions April 2025
Notifications Sent to Consultants Late April 2025 Award May 2025

If authorized, staff will issue RFP No. 25-09 to obtain proposals for comprehensive strategic plan consulting services for the Fire Department. After the RFP review and scoring process and a consultant is chosen, staff will return for City Council approval of a professional services agreement.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

N/A

ANALYSIS:

N/A

SUMMARY:

Staff is requesting authorization to issue a RFP No. 25-09 to solicit comprehensive strategic plan consulting services for the Fire Department. The proposed timeline for completing this RFP and commencing a new agreement for this service is May 2025.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Attachment A - RFP 25-09 Draft

Page 511 of 629 ends

1 CITY OF MONTEBELLO
Request for Proposals
RFP No. 25 – 09
Montebello Fire Department (MFD) Comprehensive
Strategic Plan Consulting Services
Release Date: Thursday, February 13, 2025
Questions Due: Tuesday, March 11, 2025, at 11 a.m. PST
Due Date: Wednesday, March 26, 2025, at 11 a.m. PST

ATTACHMENT A

Page 512 of 629 ends

2 [THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Page 513 of 629 ends

3 TO PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS
The City of Montebello (“City”) invites proposal submissions under this Request for Proposals ( “RFP”). The City will evaluate responses to this solicitation to determine qualifications. Submissions must adhere to the format and content described. Only proposals that adhere to the requirements will be evaluated. The information set forth is the minimum required to qualify for consideration. The successful Proposer will be required to enter into a Professional Services Agreement based on the specifications outlined in this RFP.

DATE OF SOLICITATION
February 13, 2025

PROJECT
Montebello Fire Department (MFD) Comprehensive Strategic Plan

PROPOSAL OWNER
City of Montebello – Fire Department
1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, CA 90640
Attn: Andrew Kim, Senior Management Analyst
Contact Phone: (323) 887-1200
Contact E-Mail: [email protected]

PROPOSAL CONTACT
City of Montebello – Fire Department
1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, CA 90640
Attn: Andrew Kim, Senior Management Analyst
Contact Phone: (323) 887-1200
Contact E-Mail: [email protected]

Any questions about this RFP should be submitted via the City's PlanetBids Portal by Tuesday, March 11, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. PST. Prospective consultants must register their business with PlanetBids before being able to view or submit a response. To access the City's PlanetBids Portal, please go to:

https://www.montebelloca.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=58756&pageId=84839

Page 514 of 629 ends

4 Table of Contents Page

1.0 Notice Inviting Proposals 5

2.0 Introduction/About the City of Montebello 6

3.0 Timeline 6

4.0 Purpose 6

5.0 Scope of Work 6

6.0 Consultant Qualifications 8

7.0 Proposal Submittal 8

8.0 Evaluation of Proposal 9

9.0 Proposal Protests 9

10.0 Execution of Agreement 11

11.0 Insurance 11

12.0 Use of Federal Funds 13

13.0 Non-Commitment of City 14

14.0 Labor Requirements 14

15.0 Records 14

16.0 Subcontractors 15

17.0 Modifications/Changes 15

18.0 Disclosure of Information 15

19.0 Ex-Parte Communications 15

20.0 City of Montebello Rights 15

Appendix A – Proposal Content and Format
Appendix B – Sample Professional Services Agreement
Appendix C – References

Page 515 of 629 ends

5 1.0 Notice Inviting Proposals
The City of Montebello seeks proposals from highly qualified Consultants to prepare and develop a comprehensive strategic plan for the Montebello Fire Department (MFD).

The consultant will have expertise in the areas of public safety, fire service operations, and organizational strategy to assist the department in evaluating current capabilities, future needs, and achievable goals. The strategic plan will serve as the roadmap for the department to meet community needs, address operational challenges, and plan for future growth/expansion. Prospective respondents are advised to carefully read information related to this opportunity before submitting a response.

To view the complete RFP package, please visit:

https://www.montebelloca.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=58756&pageId=84839

Prospective consultants must register with PlanetBids before being able to view or submit a response.

Questions must be submitted by Tuesday, March 11, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. PST.

*****QUESTIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED VIA PLANETBIDS*****

Proposals must be submitted via PlanetBids by Wednesday, March 26, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. PST.

Responses will be evaluated to determine the Consultant that is the most qualified and responsive to the requirements. Responses must adhere to the format and content described. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals.

Page 516 of 629 ends

6 2.0 Introduction
The City of Montebello invites prospective Consultants to submit a proposal to prepare and develop a comprehensive strategic plan for the Montebello Fire Department (MFD).

The strategic plan will serve as the roadmap for the department to meet community needs, address operational challenges, and plan for future growth/expansion.

About the City of Montebello
Montebello ("beautiful mountain" in Spanish and Italian) is a city in the County of Los Angeles. Founded in 1899 and incorporated in 1920, the City is an 8.37 square mile General Law City located approximately 11 miles east of Downtown Los Angeles.

Currently, the City has a population of approximately 63,000 residents. It hosts a mix of various industries that represent the business diversity of the County of Los Angeles. It is a full -service City that provides a long list of services, employing approximately 600 full-time and part-time employees in public safety, transit, and non-safety functions.

3.0 Timeline
• Release RFP Thursday, February 13, 2025
• Online Q&A Deadline Tuesday, March 11, 2025,11 a.m. PST • Deadline to Submit Responses Wednesday, March 26, 2025, at 11 a.m. PST • City Review of Submissions April 2025
• Notifications Sent to Consultants May 2025
• Award May 2025

4.0 Purpose
The purpose of this solicitation is to identify a highly qualified Consultant to assist the City with the knowledge and expertise in all aspects of the services requested in this RFP. This project will provide an overview of the department’s current capabilities, future needs, and operational goals. The comprehensive strategic plan will strengthen the MFD’s practices and procedures and identify opportunities for improvement through the innovative ideas provided by the Consultant.

5.0 Scope of Work/Services
The selected consultant will conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the Montebello Fire Department (MFD) to develop a strategic plan that addresses the department's current capabilities, future needs, and operational goals. This work will include the following:

Organizational Assessment

Page 517 of 629 ends

7 • To evaluate the department's structure, operations, and services by analyzing response times, staffing levels, equipment, facilities, and financial resources
• Gather input from department staff, city leadership, and key stakeholders through interviews, surveys, and focus groups.

Evaluating MFD’s Existing Community Risk Assessment (CRA) • Consultant will incorporate the department's existing Community Risk Assessment (CRA) into their evaluation process to ensure alignment with identified community needs
• Benchmarking and the review of best practices will be utilized to compare MFD’s practices to industry standards and identify opportunities for innovation and improvement
Developing the Strategic Plan
• Based on the findings above, the consultant will develop a strategic plan that defines the department's mission, vision, and core values while establishing measurable goals and objectives of implementation • Recommendations will pertain to staffing, infrastructure, and resource allocation, with consideration given to the potential addition of new fire stations and a dedicated training center
Preparing a Comprehensive Report
• The consultant will prepare a comprehensive report summarizing findings and recommendations and present the strategic plan to department leadership and the City Council.

6.0 Consultant Qualifications
The selected consultant must have the following minimum qualifications:

A. Professional Expertise

• Consultants must have demonstrated experience in developing strategic plans for public safety organizations, particularly fire departments

Page 518 of 629 ends

8 • They should possess expertise in fire service operations, emergency response planning, and community risk assessment, along with a thorough knowledge of current industry standards, regulations, and best practices in fire and emergency medical services
• Consultants must have a proven ability to conduct comprehensive organizational assessments and effectively engage with diverse stakeholders, ensuring input from all relevant parties is considered • Strong analytical, project management, and communication skills are essential, as is a track record of delivering actionable and results- oriented strategic plans within specified timelines.

B. Required Licenses and Certifications
• Relevant professional certifications, such as Certified Fire Executive (CFE) or similar, are highly desirable.

Background Check

Consultant representatives working on -site and in some remote capacities, will be required to undergo a background check conducted by the City.

7.0 Proposal submittal
Please review Appendix A - Proposal Format and Content, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, for specific details regarding the information that needs to be included in your submission. Failure to provide all requested information may be considered “non-responsive” and rejected.

Responses to this RFP must be submitted electronically via the City’s PlanetBids Portal by the deadline. Any responses transmitted and/or time -stamped after the deadline will not be accepted. Consultants planning to submit responses to this request are highly encouraged to submit all documentation before the deadline to avoid technical difficulties/errors.

8.0 Evaluation Criteria
The City will establish an evaluation committee to review and rat e each proposal. The proposal evaluation process will be conducted using a multi -step method which will include the following steps:

A. Preliminary Proposal Review - The evaluation committee will review each

Page 519 of 629 ends

9 submission to ensure adherence to the minimum/proposal format requirements.

B. Proposal Evaluation - In the second part of this process, the evaluation committee will review and rate proposals using a combined score based on the following:

i. Qualifications as they relate to this project - 65% a. Thoroughness and understanding of the tasks to be completed b. Background and experience
c. Knowledge of the City of Montebello
d. Experience of personnel assigned to the work
e. Communication Skills
f. Interview, if required

ii. Reputation for integrity and competence – 15%
a. Positive Reference Checks
b. Work Samples

iii. Proposed fees for services – 20%

The City reserves the right to request and obtain, from one or more proposers, supplementary information as may be necessary for the City to analyze the proposal pursuant to selection criteria. Upon completion of the evaluation phase, the City may select those consultants for interviews whose proposals and qualifications most closely conform to the requirements of this RFP and provide the best value to the City.

9.0 Protest Procedures
Proposal Protest Procedures (Before Proposal Opening)
A protest filed before the proposal opening must be filed in writing or by email no later than ten (10) working days before opening. The most common types of protest that might be filed before a proposal opening include those based upon restrictive specifications or alleged improprieties in any solicitation that is apparent before the scheduled proposal opening.

When a protest is filed before a scheduled proposal opening, certain steps must be followed:

A. The protest must be submitted in writing within the specified time frame (no later than ten (10) working days prior to a proposal opening). All protests must be filed with the Director of Finance for determination. Protest must be submitted to the Director of Finance by mail or e-mail within the specified time frame. Protests can

Page 520 of 629 ends

10 be sent to:

Mail:

Michael Solorza, Director of Finance
City of Montebello
Attn: Department of Finance
1600 W. Beverly Blvd
Montebello, CA 90640

E-mail:
[email protected]

B. The protest must contain factual and legal reason(s) and should recommend a proposed remedy. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the City reserves the right not to implement the proposed remedy but to offer alternative solutions where applicable.

C. Where appropriate, the City will hold an informal conference on the merits of a protest with all interested parties allowed to attend. Interested parties may include all proposers, subcontractors, or suppliers, provided they have a substantial economic interest in a portion of the RFP.

D. All potential proposers will be advised of a pending protest.

E. The City shall not open proposals prior to the resolution of the protest unless it is determined that:

• The items to be procured are urgently required;
• Delivery or performance will be unduly delay ed by failure to make the award promptly; or
• Failure to make a prompt award will otherwise cause undue harm to the City.

The City will respond in writing within ten (10) working days after receipt of a properly filed protest. The Director of Finance will respon d and include a response to each substantive issue raised in the protest.

After the exhaustion of administrative remedies, the protesting party will be given the City’s final decision. The Director of Finance has the authority to decide on all protests.

Page 521 of 629 ends

11 Proposal Protest Procedures (After Proposal Opening/Post Award) A protest filed after a proposal deadline must be filed within three (3) working days after the proposal deadline/due date. The City will grant the protesting Consultant a fair review and shall have up to ten (10) working days to review the protest and render its decision.

10.0 Execution of Agreement
The resulting agreement (see attached sample) shall be signed by the successful Consultant and returned within the required insurance within ten (10) business days after the City has provided written notice that the Consultant has been awarded. Failure to execute the agreement and file acceptable insurance documents as provided herein shall cause, at the City's option, for annulment of the award. Please review the insurance requirements and indemnification clause in the attached sample agreement.

Should the successful Consultant decline to execute the agreement, the City can either reject all proposals, accept one of the other proposals, or issue a new solicitation.

11.0 Insurance
The Consultant selected must meet the following minimum insurance requirements upon execution of the City’s Professional Services Agreement:

A. Commercial General Liability
Commercial General Liability (CGL) (equivalent in coverage scope to Insurance Services Office, Inc. Form CG 00 01) shall cover on an “occurrence” basis for bodily injury and property damage, including premise -operations, products -completed, broad form property damage, blanket contractual liability, independent contractors, personal injury or bodily injury, and advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 aggregate.

If requested, the "City of Montebello, its officials, employees, and agents" must be separately endorsed to the policy as additional insureds on an endorsement equivalent to the Insurance Services Office, Inc. Form CG 20 10 11 85 of CG 20 26 1185.

B. Business Automobile Liability
For owned vehicles, hired, and non-owned vehicles, Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if the Consultant has not owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non -owned) with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

If an automobile is not necessary to perform services, the Firm must submit a

Page 522 of 629 ends

12 written request for a waiver of this requirement.

C. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions
Depending on the work or services to be performed, professional liability or errors and omissions liability insurance may be required. The City will require the Consultant to provide professional liability or errors and omissions liability insurance in an amount not less than $ 2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $ 4,000,000 aggregate. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability.

D. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability
Workers' compensation as required by the California Labor Code and Employer's Liability in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

Required Insurance Documentation

Certificate of Insurance
The Certificate Holder must be listed as follows:

City of Montebello
1600 West Beverly Boulevard
Montebello, CA 90640

Endorsements (if requested)
In addition to the Certificate of Insurance, the Consultant must provide the following endorsements:

Additional insured endorsements to the general liability and auto liability* insurance policies. The "City of Montebello, its officials, employees, and agents" must be endorsed to the Consultant’s general liability policy as well as the auto liability policy as additional insureds on an endorsement equivalent to ISO forms CG 20 10 11 85 or CG 20 26 11 85.

Cancellation notice endorsements. Each policy must be endorsed to certify that it will not be canceled or non-renewed by either party or reduced in coverage or limits (except by paid claims) unless the insurer has provided the City with thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation (ten (10) days for cancellation due to nonpayment of premium is acceptable).

Primary, non-contributory coverage endorsements. The general liability and professional liability (if required) policies must be endorsed to provide that each policy shall apply on a primary, non -contributing basis with any insurance or self -

Page 523 of 629 ends

13 insurance, primary or excess, maintained by or available to the City or its officials, employees, and agents.

Waiver and Modifications of Insurance Requirements
To the extent permitted by law, the City may modify these insurance requirements at any time and at its sole discretion.

In general, any contract deemed sole source, professional/professional services, involves the disclosure of proprietary information, and/or a public works project may require revisions to the City's standard insurance requirements. Any revisions to the insurance requirements will be identified within the associated service contract terms and conditions.

Consultants may request a waiver or modification of these insurance requirements.

Waiver or modification requests must be submitted in writing. The request should state the specific insurance requirement that is being considered for waiver or modification and provide a brief explanation for the request. Requests will be reviewed on a case -by- case basis, and the decision will ultimately depend on the scope of services. The final decision to approve or deny a request will be at the City's legal authority and/or an authorized designee's discretion.

12.0 Use of Federal Funds
The United States Federal Government requires purchases of items and services to meet specific standards when using Federal funds, including grants, cooperative agreements, contracts, and Federal funds "passed -through" to the City from a non - Federal entity (i.e., sub -recipient agreements). These requirements are codified under the Code of Federal Regulation's (CFR) Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 (also referred to as "2 CFR 200" or "Uniform Guidance") and the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), as applicable.

The following standards apply to all purchases of items and services using Federal funds:

• Transactions shall be conducted lawfully and ethically • Unnecessary/duplicative purchases are not permitted
• Utilizing a vendor or supplier on the U.S. Federal Government's Debarred and Suspended List (available at SAM.gov) is prohibited
• All individuals involved in the expenditure of federal monies must avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest
• Procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition

Page 524 of 629 ends

14 • Opportunities should be provided to minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms when possible • Contracts and purchase orders should include the contract provisions required by 2 CFR 200 Appendix A
• Purchases of goods and services must include documentation detailing the procurement history

In addition to Federal standards, purchases must adhere to applicable local policies and procedures as defined in Montebello Municipal Code Chapters 3.20 and 3.21 and any relevant administrative policies. The most restrictive terms prevail when a conflict is present.

13.0 Non-Commitment of City
While the City intends to select a Consultant through this process, this intention is subject to change at any time during the process. The City does not commit to awarding an agreement, paying any costs incurred in preparing the proposal for this request, and/or procuring or contracting any items or services.

14.0 Labor Requirements

A. Background: All personnel engaged in the performance of this work shall be employees of the Consultant and, as such, shall be warranted to possess sufficient experience and reliability to perform this work.

B. Health: All personnel engaged in the performance of this work shall be in good health and free of contagious diseases. The Consultant shall not allow any person(s) under the influence of alcohol or drugs on the premises or in the building. Neither shall the Consultant allow the use of or presence of alcohol or drugs on the premises or in the building.

C. Non-Discrimination: The Consultant shall not engage in discrimination in the employment of persons because of race, color, national origin, ancestry, mental/physical disabilities, sex, or religion of such persons.

D. Conduct: No person(s) shall be employed for this work that is found to be incompetent, disorderly, and troublesome, under the influence of alcohol and drugs, which fails or otherwise refuses to perform the work properly and acceptably or is otherwise objectionable. Any person found to be objectionable shall be discharged immediately and not re-employed for this work.

15.0 Records
The Consultant agrees to permit the City Manager or designee access to records,

Page 525 of 629 ends

15 reports, files, and other papers or property of the Consultant to audit any performance aspect under this agreement.

16.0 Subcontractors
The Consultant shall be responsible for all work performed under the final agreement and shall keep all work under his control. No portion of the work may be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City. All subcontractors used on this work shall be under the direct supervision of the Consultant and shall be considered as their employees. Any approved subcontractors must provide insurance indemnifying the City with limits at or exceeding the limits of the Contractor's insurance.

17.0 Modifications/Changes
Changes in the areas serviced and/or specifications may be necessary during the agreement term. Changes in the agreement’s requirements and corresponding changes in compensation may be implemented upon mutual understanding between the City and the Consultant. These changes will be processed by the City Manager.

18.0 Disclosure of Information
A. The Consultant agrees that it will not during or after the term of the agreement, disclose any proprietary information or confidential business information of the City, including but not limited to its costs, charges, operating procedures, or methods of doing business to any person, Consultant, corporation, association, or other entity or the general public for any reason or purpose whatsoever, without the prior written consent of the City. Such confidential or proprietary information received by the Consultant shall be used exclusively in connection with the performance of services.

B. The Consultant shall not issue or release for publication any articles, advertising, or publicity matters relating to the services performed by the Consultant hereunder or mentioning or implying the name of the City or its respective personnel without the prior written consent of the City.

19.0 Ex-Parte Communications
Consultant and Consultant representatives should not engage in unauthorized communications with elected officials, officers, employees, or agents of the City about this RFP. This requirement also includes any evaluation panel member, except for designated RFP facilitators. This requirement remains in effect until after award notifications have been made.

This restriction does not prohibit Consultants and their representatives from making oral statements or presentations to City representatives from submitting questions regarding

Page 526 of 629 ends

16 this RFP pursuant to the directions provided herein, or making oral statements or presentations to City representatives during a scheduled public meeting.

20.0 City of Montebello Rights
At its discretion, the City reserves the right to:

A. Reject any and/or all proposals for no reason or any reason including, but not limited to, the following:

i. The proposal is incomplete, non -responsive, obscure, irregular, or lacking necessary detail and specificity.
ii. The Consultant, in the sole judgment of the City, lacks the qualifications, experience, and/or responsibility necessary to provide the services. iii. The Consultant failed or neglected to complete and submit any information within the time specified by the City and as may be otherwise required herein.

B. Reject any proposal that, in the opinion of the City, is so unbalanced in comparison to other proposals received and/or to the City’s internal estimates that it does not accurately reflect the cost to perform;

C. Accept all or any part of a proposal;

D. Cancel the entire RFP;

E. Issue subsequent RFPs; or

F. Waive any errors or informalities in any proposal to the extent law permits.

Please review:

Appendix A – Proposal Content and Format

Appendix B – Sample Professional Services Agreement

Appendix C – References

Page 527 of 629 ends

ITEM # 20

CITY OF MONTEBELLO

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: Raul Alvarez, City Manager

BY: John Soria, Director

SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 25-09 APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO

AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (METRO) TO ACCEPT
MONTEBELLO BUS LINES’ PARTICIPATION IN THE ZERO EMISSION

TRANSIT CAPITAL PROGRAM

DATE: February 12, 2025

RECOMMENDATIONS:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 25-09 approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Montebello and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to accept Montebello Bus Lines’ (MBL) participation in the Zero Emission Transit Capital Program (ZETCP) effective October 1, 2024 through June 30, 2028; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU on the City’s behalf; and

3. Take such additional, related, action that may be reasonable and necessary.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to approve a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to accept Montebello Bus Lines’ (MBL) participation in the Zero Emission Transit Capital Program (ZETCP) (Attachment A). By participating in this program, the City will receive a one-time allocation of $3,168,129 for Fiscal Year 2024-25. Once these funds are allocated, the City Council will be requested to approve receipt of these funds and to amend the FY 2024-25 adopted operating budget to appropriate these funds into the accounts designated for MBL’s zero emission transition plan. Subsequent City Council

Page 528 of 629 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Page 2 of 3 ends

action will be required for this, and Staff will present an agenda report to accept and allocate the funding at a future City Council meeting.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Senate Bill (SB) 125 guides the distribution of $4 billion in State General Funds through the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP). There is $1.1 billion specifically designated for the ZETCP, which authorizes Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs) to use these funds for zero emission activities or to fund transit operating expenditures to prevent service reductions or maintain ridership. The ZETCP is a state- funded initiative designed to help public transit agencies transition to zero emission vehicles, such as fuel cell electric buses (FCEBs), to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality. The City’s participation in this program is formalized through an MOU with Metro, the RTPA for Los Angeles County. This agreement allows MBL to access ZETCP funding for the procurement of FCEBs and refueling infrastructure.

In July 2024, the California State Transportation Agency (CALSTA) approved LACMTA’s SB 125 allocation package, which included $498.7 million in TIRCP funds and an additional $119.5 million in ZETCP funds. The SB 125 ZETCP will allocate $320.6 million to LACMTA. On September 26, 2024, the Metro Board adopted the Los Angeles County Regional Zero Emission Bus Procurement Policy (Attachment B). In addition, the LACMTA Board approved advancing a total four-year allocation of $49.84 million in Proposition C, 40% Discretionary ZETCP funds for eligible transit operators.

Staff recommend that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 25-09 (Attachment C) approving an MOU between the City and LACMTA to formalize MBL’s participation in the ZETCP. This partnership aligns with Montebello’s sustainability goals, reduces emissions, and enhances public transportation services for the city and surrounding communities. Since LACMTA is responsible for administering these funds, the City will utilize the ZETCP funds in accordance with LACMTA’s guidelines adopted on September 26, 2025. The MOU is effective from October 1, 2024 through June 30, 2028.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

N/A

ANALYSIS:

N/A

SUMMARY:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 25-09 (Attachment C) approving an MOU (Attachment A) between the City and LACMTA to accept MBL’s participation in the ZETCP from October 1, 2024 through June 30, 2028; authorize the City Manager to execute the MOU on the City’s behalf; and take such additional, related, action as is reasonable and necessary.

Page 529 of 629 ends

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2025

Page 3 of 3 ends

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Attachment A – ZETCP MOU between the City and LACMTA

2. Attachment B – LACMTA Zero Emission Bus Procurement Policy

3. Attachment C – Resolution No. 25-09

Page 530 of 629 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 531 of 629 ends

Page 532 of 629 ends

Page 533 of 629 ends

Page 534 of 629 ends

Page 535 of 629 ends

Page 536 of 629 ends

Page 537 of 629 ends

Page 538 of 629 ends

Page 539 of 629 ends

Page 540 of 629 ends

Page 541 of 629 ends

Page 542 of 629 ends

ATTACHMENT B
Los
Angeles County Regional Zero Emission Bus Procurement Policy

BACKGROUND
The United States transit bus manufacturing industry is in crisis. Severe cash flow pressures caused by quality issues related to unreliable components and immature technology; outdated payment practices and delays; capital and other commercial risks; cost increases due to supply chain disruptions in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic; and additional burdens due to Buy America, Altoona testing, 12-year design life, and other factors have contributed to marketplace turmoil.

POLICY OBJECTIVE
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Dear Colleague Letter dated February 7, 2024 introduced several procurement recommendations to bolster interest and competition within the U.S. bus manufacturing industry. This includes supporting the standardization of vehicle specifications across multiple agencies, introducing progress payments to relieve original equipment manufacturer (OEM) cash flow pressures, as well as reducing supply chain constraints, lead times, and costs for both OEMs and agencies.

POLICY STATEMENT
Metro, through its collaboration with the Los Angeles County Municipal Operators Association (LACMOA), will leverage funds to regionally procure zero emission buses (ZEB) and related infrastructure, increasing competition and interest among U.S. bus manufacturers. This coordinated approach is essential to resolving the challenges facing U.S. bus manufacturing and ensuring that sufficient manufacturers remain in the market to support Metro and LACMOA’s transition to zero emission fleets. Without such efforts, the pool of available bus manufacturers may shrink further, undermining the ability of agencies to meet their zero emission goals at a pivotal time.

As such, LA County transit agencies will participate in either a regional procurement or statewide procurement that meets the following criteria:
• Reduces Customization. By facilitating standardization of vehicle specifications across multiple agencies, a regional or statewide procurement process will alleviate pressures on OEMs and reduce supply chain constraints, lead times, and costs for both OEMs and transit agencies. The regional approach will reduce the need for extensive customization, streamlining production and enhancing market stability.
• Includes Milestone Payments and Performance-Based Technicial Specifications. In alignment with the American Public Transportation

Page 543 of 629 ends

Association Bus Manufacturing Task Force recommendations, prioritizing milestone payments and performance-based technical specifications, including limiting brand preferences, helps ensure a fair and competitive bidding process.

Additionally, milestone payments will be contingent upon more rigorous testing standards, enhancing quality assurance and reducing program risks for agencies transitioning to ZEB.
• Includes Pricing Standards. The regional approach also allows bus price escalation between Notice to Proceed and production, based on the Producer Price Index.

The regional procurement is an important step in strengthening U.S. bus manufacturing, and Metro will continue to collaborate with LACMOA on future procurements to support acceleration of our region’s clean vehicle future as well as to ensure our region’s communities receive reliable transit service.

Page 544 of 629 ends

ATTACHMENT _C_
RESOLUTION NO. 25-09

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)

BETWEEN THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO AND THE LOS ANGELES

COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
(LACMTA) TO ACCEPT MONTEBELLO BUS LINES’ PARTICIPATION IN

THE ZERO EMISSION TRANSIT CAPITAL PROGRAM

RECITALS
WHEREAS, on September 26, 2024, the LACMTA Board adopted the Los Angeles County Regional Zero Emissions Bus Procurement Policy; and WHEREAS, the Board approved the Los Angeles County Regional Zero Emission Transit Capital Program (ZETCP)- Equivalent Fund Allocation Framwork (“Framwork”); and
WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 125 Zero Emission Transit Capital Program will allocate $320.6 million to Metro, as the county’s regional transportation planning agency, over four years beginning in 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Board approved ZETCP-EQUIVALENT FUND ALLOCATIONS; and
WHEREAS, MBL was allocated three million one hundred and sixty-eight thousand one hundred and twenty-nine dollars ($3,168,129) in FY 25 only; and WHEREAS, MBL agrees that the advanced allocation of funds allows for immediate use; and
WHEREAS, the MOU will be in effect from October 1, 2024, through June 30, 2028, unless terminated earlier; and

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO HEREBY RESOLVES, FINDS, AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

APPROVES THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS TO OBTAIN FUNDS PROVIDED BY SB 125, AND SECTION 1: Approvals and Certifications.

1. Certifies that the City Manager and appointed Designee be authorized to execute all required documents of the MOU; and

2. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and guidelines for all ZETCP funded transit projects; and

Page 545 of 629 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 25-09

Page 2 of 2 ends

SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and that the same shall be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025.
_______________________________
Salvador Melendez, Mayor
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ________________________________ Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS:

CITY OF MONTEBELLO )
I, Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk of the City of Montebello, County of Los Angeles, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-09 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Montebello, signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 12 th day of February 2025 and that said Resolution was adopted by the following vote, to-wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

DATE:

Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk

Page 546 of 629 ends

ITEM # 21

CITY OF MONTEBELLO

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: Raul Alvarez, City Manager

BY: John Soria, Director

SUBJECT: APPROVE ISSUING A REQUEST FOR QUOTES (RFQ) NO. Q-25-01

FOR TRANSIT NON-REVENUE RELIEF VEHICLES

DATE: February 12, 2025

RECOMMENDATIONS:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approve Issuing a Request for Quotes (RFQ), No. Q-25-01 for Transit Non- Revenue Relief Vehicles; and

2. Take such additional, related, action that may be reasonable and necessary

FISCAL IMPACT:

Federal funding for this procurement was secured through the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Urbanized Area Formula Funding program under Title 49 U.S.C.

Chapter 53 Section 5307 (49 U.S.C. 5307). The specific requirements and language related to federal compliance are outlined in Request for Quotes (RFQ) No. Q-25-01.

However, there is no fiscal impact to issue an RFQ for Transit non-revenue relief vehicles (Attachment A). Once a vendor is selected for the award, the City Council will be requested to consider approving an agreement with the chosen vendor at a future City Council meeting.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The City of Montebello seeks to update Montebello Bus Lines’ (MBL) fleet of non-revenue relief vehicles. The fleet of non-revenue relief vehicles has met or exceeded the FTA’s Useful Life Benchmark (ULB) of eight (8) years. The ULB is the expected lifecycle or acceptable service use period of a capital asset for the agency’s operating environment.

Replacing Transit's non-revenue fleet is crucial for maintaining operational reliability and

Page 547 of 629 ends

Montebello City CouncilFebruary 12, 2025

Montebello City Council
February 12, 2025