Agenda packet — Monterey City Council, June 29, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

Council Chamber, 580 Pacific
St., and Zoom Teleconference
Monterey, California
Monterey City Council
Special Meeting Agenda
Council Special Meeting
Wednesday, June 29, 2022
4:00 PM – 5:30 PM
7:00 PM – 11:00 PM
City Council
Clyde Roberson, Mayor
Dan Albert, Councilmember
Alan Haffa, Councilmember
Ed Smith, Councilmember
Tyller Williamson, Councilmember
City Manager
Hans Uslar
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Pursuant to California Government Code section 54953(e)(1)(A) and (C) and the Monterey City Council’s resolution authorizing virtual participation in public meetings given the COVID-19 pandemic, meetings of the Monterey City Council and its Boards, Commissions, and Committees are being conducted with a hybrid format providing both inperson and virtual (electronic) participation in order to promote social distancing and protect the health and safety of attendees.

Details for public participation in this City Council meeting:
 BEFORE THIS MEETING, members of the public may submit comment(s) to [email protected] until ½ hour before the start of the meeting. These messages will not be read aloud during the meeting but are made available to the Council and public at monterey.org/submitted-comments and in the City Manager’s Office at 580 Pacific St., Room 1, Monterey, CA 93940 during regular business hours. All comments received become part of the record.
 DURING THIS MEETING, members of the public may attend and participate:
o In-person (location listed above), with masks strongly recommended for all, regardless of vaccination status, except those who are younger than two years old or have a medical condition that prevents wearing a mask.  Online via ZoomGov Webinar live (no time delay):
 Join on a computer or smartphone: https://montereyorg.zoomgov.com/j/1607729333 An up-to-date version of the Zoom software must be used.
 Or join by telephone: Dial 833-568-8864 (Toll Free), 669-254-5252 (Campbell, Calif.) or 646-828-7666 (New York, NY). If one number doesn’t work, please try another.
 Enter Webinar ID: 160 772 9333 #
 If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #
 To “raise your hand” dial *9. Once called upon, dial *6 to unmute.  Need more help using or updating Zoom? Read our ZoomGov Meeting Instructions.
o This meeting will also stream live for viewing only on youtube.com/cityofmonterey (10 second delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90 second delay).

CALL TO ORDER

CONSENT ITEMS
CONSENT AGENDA consists of those items which are routine and for which a staff recommendation has been prepared. A member of the public or a Councilmember may request that an item be placed on the regular agenda for further discussion.

Other
6/29/2022 4:00:00 PM
2 1. Ratify City Council Vote on the Consent Agenda of June 21, 2022 (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)

2. Ratify City Council Vote of June 21, 2022 Approving 1st Reading - Amend Chapter 19 of the Monterey City Code (Licenses, Fees, and Charges) to Prohibit the Sale of all Flavored Tobacco Products (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

3. Ratify City Council Vote of June 21, 2022 Adopting Automated License Plate Recognition Policy for Use in Parking Operations (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

4. Appoint Contract Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 for Labor Negotiations with the City Manager and City Attorney (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061). ***End of Consent Agenda***
Adjourn to Ocean View Community Services District Meeting: Consent Agenda

5. Receive Ocean View Community Services District Quarterly Report (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
***Adjourn to City Council Meeting***

STUDY SESSION
STUDY SESSION items are used to provide information to the City Council and answer their questions to clarify issues. Study Sessions provide a setting for informal discussions between staff, consultants, board, commission,committee members and the City Council regarding specific programs, projects or policies. Council does not take formal action on the items.

6. Receive Presentation on Reinvesting in the Monterey Sports Center: Emerging Trends and the Pending Sports Center Operational Assessment (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
***Adjourn to Closed Session (See additional agenda)*** RECESS 5:30 p.m.

RECONVENE
*** Evening Session Agenda ***
7:00 - 11:00 p.m.

No discussion of a new item will be started after 10:30 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION
6/29/2022 4:00:00 PM
3 PUBLIC APPEARANCE (EVE)
PUBLIC APPEARANCE items are reports on non-routine issues that might stimulate public discussion, but that do not require formal noticing as public hearings. You are welcome to offer your comments after being recognized by the Mayor. The Council may limit the time each speaker is allocated.

7. Adopt the FY2022/23 Operating Budget (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

8. Calling a General Municipal Election for November 8, 2022 and Proposing a General Business License Tax on Commercial Cannabis Activity (Exempt from CEQA pursuant to Pub. Resources Code 21065, CEQA Guidelines 15378(b)(4), 15061(b)(3) and Pub. Resources Code 21080, subd. (b)(8); CEQA Guidelines 15273(a)(4).)

ADJOURNMENT
Members of the public have the right to address the City Council on any item on the Agenda, before or during its consideration [G.C. §54954.3(a)]. The Mayor will formally open the floor for public comment on items such as "Public Appearance" and "Public Hearings." Comment may be made via the method described in the Important Notice (re: COVID-19) at the top of the agenda.

Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on these matters within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, are available at: monterey.org/submitted-comments and in the City Manager’s Office at 580 Pacific St., Room 1, Monterey, CA 93940 during regular business hours.

Information distributed to the Council at the Council meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of written material, pictures, etc. should be provided for this purpose.

City Council Meetings are cable cast live and videotaped for replay on Monterey's Government Access Channel 25 by Access Media Productions (AMP).

CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:

Voicemail: (831) 646-3799
Fax: (831) 646-3793
Email: [email protected]
WebPage: http://www.monterey.org
INTERPRETATION: The Monterey City Council invites and encourages public participation at its meetings. Requests for language interpretation may be made by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 831-646-3935. The City Clerk will make every effort to accommodate requests for interpreter assistance. Requests should be made as soon as possible in advance of any meeting of the City Council. The City is committed to addressing language interpretation requests swiftly in order to maximize public participation.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected] or (831) 646-3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-tospeech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.

Upcoming city meetings are listed at http://isearchmonterey.org More information is available by calling (831) 646-3935 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Ratify City Council Vote on the Consent Agenda of June 21, 2022 (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council ratify the City Council vote on the Consent Agenda of June 21, 2022.

VALUE DRIVER:

Maintain and expand methods for the public to engage and interact with their city government using a variety of engagement tools including media outreach, digital communications, and inperson engagement.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The telephone call-in instructions for the regular City Council meeting of June 21, 2022 meeting agenda contained a clerical error. Opening public comment and ratifying the City Council vote on the June 21, 2022 consent agenda would ensure that all members of the public have an opportunity to provide feedback, and the City Council has an opportunity to ratify its vote during a meeting that is properly agendized.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There is no new or additional cost associated with this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Taking no action is not advised, since members of the public were not able to call in to the meeting to participate and/or provide public comment as published on the agenda.

Date: 6/29/2022
Item No.: 1.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 1, Packet Page 4 DISCUSSION:

Since March 2020, the City of Monterey has provided the public with multiple methods of participating in City Council, boards, and commission meetings. These methods include watching Council meetings on the Monterey Channel (Comcast Channel 25), City website, and YouTube Live, and participating in the meeting by joining in person (when available), on Zoom, or by telephone.

During the afternoon session on June 22, 2022, the City Council considered the Consent Calendar. Items No. 6 (Amend and Restate Resolution 22-024, the Master Fee Schedule, to Amend the City Clerk, Harbor, Library/Museums, Parking, and Cemetery Division Fee Schedules) and No. 11 (Appropriate $10,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account to the Fishermen’s Flats Traffic Calming Plan Project Account) were pulled. Staff announced that Item No. 7 (Adopt Resolution Certifying Compliance with State Law with Respect to Levying Assessments and Special Taxes) was recommended to be tabled to be heard at a future date. The City Council voted 4-0 (Councilmember Alan Haffa was absent) to approve the Consent Calendar except for Items 6, 7 and 11. A discussion was held regarding Item 6 relating to the Recreational Vehicle (RV) storage fees, and it was approved on a 4-0 vote. A discussion was held regarding Item 11 relating to the Fisherman’s Flats traffic calming efforts, and it was approved on a 4-0 vote.

During the evening session of the June 22, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting, staff was alerted that the Webinar ID, which is required for the public to participate by telephone, was missing a digit. As a result, members of the public who do not have access to television, Internet, or the City Council Chambers, were unable to participate by telephone as indicated on the agenda.

Staff informed City Council and the public of this error immediately following the presentation of the 2022/23 Operating Budget (Item No. 23). The City Attorney advised the City Council to reconsider all items at its meeting on June 29, 2022 meeting, and the City Council agreed.

For these reasons, staff recommends the City Council ratify the City Council vote of June 21, 2022 Consent Agenda (Items No. 1 through 6, and 8 through 19, and table Item No. 7).

Attachments: 1. Consent Item No. 1: 1st Reading of an Omnibus Ordinance to Make Clerical/Technical Updates to the City Code (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

2. Consent Item No. 2: 2nd Reading of Ordinance to Add Monterey City Code Section 22-26.6 to Prohibit Sitting or Lying Down on the Floor Inside Public Restrooms (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

3. Consent Item No. 3: Authorize Remote Teleconference Meetings of the City Council and Boards, Commissions, and Committees for the Period July 9, 2022 through July 21, 2022 Pursuant to AB361 Ralph M. Brown Act Provisions (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)

4. Consent Item No. 4: Authorize Professional Services Agreements with Michael Baker International Inc. for a Not to Exceed Amount of $200,000, To Provide On-Call Housing Program Consultant Services (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 2, Packet Page 5

5. Consent Item No. 5: Ratify Payment to Precision Grade, Inc. for the David/Spencer Curb Extensions Project NIP2013 (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***NCIP***

6. Consent Item No. 6: Amend and Restate Resolution 22-024, the Master Fee Schedule, to Amend the City Clerk, Harbor, Library/Museums, Parking, and Cemetery Division Fee Schedules (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

7. Consent Item No. 8: Award a Contract in the Amount of $105,654.40 to Ampersand Contract Signing Group for the Wayfinding Sign Fabrication, Phase 2 Project ***CIP*** (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

8. Consent Item No. 9: Adopt a Resolution to Appropriate Grant and Bookmobile Reserve Funds and Authorize the Purchase of One (1) 2022 Mercedes Sprinter Van Bookmobile in the Amount of $213,721 Through a Contract with Farber Specialty Vehicles (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

9. Consent Item No. 10: Appropriate $27,000.00 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account to the Aeneas Bridge Restoration Project Account (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31) ***NCIP***

10. Consent Item No. 11: Appropriate $10,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account to the Fishermen’s Flats Traffic Calming Plan Project Account (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15306, Class 6) ***NCIP***

11. Consent Item No. 12: Appropriate $118,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account to the Pearl/Figueroa Street Intersection Project Account (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***NCIP***

12. Consent Item No. 13: Repeal Resolutions 14,037; 14,038; and 14,056 Effective June 30, 2022 and Terminate Revenue Sharing with the City of Pacific Grove for 300 David Avenue Monterey Effective July 1, 2022 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

13. Consent Item No. 14: Repeal Resolutions 82-4 and 82-5 Effective June 30, 2022 and Terminate Revenue Sharing with the City of Pacific Grove for 902 Lighthouse Ave Monterey Effective July 1, 2022 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

14. Consent Item No. 15: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 353 Camino El Estero; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Monica Lal (Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce); Under Negotiation: Terms and Conditions for Lease Amendment (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

15. Consent Item No. 16: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8: Property: Approximately 256 Square Feet Located in the Wharf II Warehouse; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 3, Packet Page 6 Negotiating Parties: Robbie Torrise (Robbie's Ocean Fresh Seafood, Inc.); Under Negotiation: Terms and Conditions for Lease Amendment (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

16. Consent Item No. 17: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 700 Cannery Row; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Mike Zimmerman (Cannery Row Company); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Lease Extension (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

17. Consent Item No. 18: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 720 Cannery Row; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Mike Zimmerman (Cannery Row Company); Under Negotiation: Terms and Conditions for Lease Extension (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

18. Consent Item No. 19: Receive Mayor’s Recommendation and Appoint Justin Ono to the Parks and Recreation Committee (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 19, Section 15061)
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 4, Packet Page 7 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
SUBJECT: 1
st Reading of an Omnibus Ordinance to Make Clerical/Technical Updates to the City Code (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council introduce by title only, waive full reading, and pass a first reading of an omnibus ordinance to make clerical/technical changes to the City Code for accuracy.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Adoption is consistent with City policy to maintain an up-to-date, legally compliant, and accurate City Code.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications with adopting the proposed code revisions.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City could adopt some or none of the suggested City Code revisions. Staff does not recommend either of those actions.

Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 1, Packet Page 1 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 5, Packet Page 8 DISCUSSION:

There have been departmental reorganizations over the last several years with changes to job titles and responsibilities, for example, the Plans and Public Works Director currently referenced in the code is now either the Public Works Director or the Community Development Director.

The amendments update these job titles.

On April 28, 2022, the Board of Library Trustees reviewed and recommended the code edits described below that are applicable to Library employees.

A brief description of the recommended changes to the City Code as shown in the attached omnibus ordinance is as follows:

Section 3. (Chapter 1, General Provisions)
 This amendment updates the definition of “Enforcement Officer” to reflect the positions that are authorized to issue administrative citations.

Section 4. (Chapter 9, Building Regulations)
 Updates job titles.

Section 5. (Chapter 9, Digging and Excavation on the Former Fort Ord)  Updates job titles.

Section 6. (Amendments to Chapter 25, Duties and Authority)  Specifies that the Library Director is responsible, like the City Manager and the City Attorney, for administering personnel rules in their department. Also, that in addition to the Board of Trustees, the Library Director has the authority to appoint and remove employees in the Library.

Section 7. (Amendments to Chapter 25, Classified Service)  This amendment reflects that Library personnel are not exempt from the classified service.

Section 8. (Amendments to Chapter 25, Department Heads)  The amendment corrects the titles of department heads and the positions that are considered department heads.

Section 9. (Amendments to Chapter 25, Complaint Reporting)  Specifies that complaints against the Library Director are made to the Human Resources Director for investigation for consideration and disposition by the Board of Library Trustees.

Section 10. (Amendments to Chapter 25, Harassment/Discrimination)  This amendment makes clear that the
Harassment/Discrimination/Retaliation/Abusive Conduct/Bullying Policy is applicable to City board, commission, and committee members.

Section 11. (Amendments to Chapter 25, Employment of Relatives)  This amendment provides that immediate family members of the Board of Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 2, Packet Page 2 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 6, Packet Page 9 Library Trustees may not hold the position of Library Director.

Section 12. (Amendments to Chapter 25, Open or Promotional Examinations)  Deletes the provision limiting the ability of Library employees to apply for promotional exams for classifications in other City departments.

Section 13. (Amendments to Chapter 25, Appeal to the City Council)  The amendment provides that any disciplinary action imposed by the Library Director on a Library employee, except oral and written reprimands, could be appealed to the City Manager as a 1st appeal step. It also adds a provision that any decision by the Library Director to terminate a Library employee, if affirmed by the City Manager in the 1st appeal step, could be appealed to the Board of Library Trustees.

Section 14. (Amendments to Chapter 22, Massage Therapists and Establishments)  Eliminates that requirement that a massage therapist “display on his or her person” their state massage therapy license and instead authorizes the license to be in their possession.

Sections 15, 16, and 17. (Amendments to Chapter 32, Street Excavation)  Corrects department names and other job title corrections.

Sections 18 and 19. (Amendments to Chapter 32, Filing of Preliminary Map)  Corrects job titles.

Staff recommends that the omnibus ordinance be passed to print.

Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance
e:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№07/19

AN OMNIBUS ORDINANCE TO MAKE CLERICAL/TECHNICAL UPDATES TO THE

MONTEREY CITY CODE
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, several departments in the City have been reorganized and job titles have changed, requiring clerical updates to the City Code for accuracy; WHEREAS, on April 28, 2022, the Board of Library Trustees considered and recommended edits to the code that are set forth below that pertain to Library employees and the Library Director;
WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City to maintain an up-to-date, legally compliant, and accurate City Code;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project.

NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

SECTION 2: The foregoing recitals are adopted as findings of the City Council as though set forth fully herein.

SECTION 3: Monterey City Code, Chapter 1, Section 1-9.1(B) is hereby amended to read as follows:
““Enforcement Officer” shall mean the City Attorney, Code Compliance Coordinator, any Police Officer, and any City employee or agent of the City delegated authority by the City Manager to enforce any provision of this Code.”
SECTION 4: Monterey City Code, Chapter 9, is hereby amended as follows:

1. The term “Building Inspector” is replaced with “Chief of Inspection Services/Building Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 4, Packet Page 4 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 8, Packet Page 11 2 Official” in sections 9-22 and 9-70.2.

2. The term “Public Works Director” is replaced with “Chief of Inspection Services/Building Official” in sections 9-51, 9-77 and 9-81 through 9-83.

3. The term “Public Works Director” is replaced with Chief Building Official in section 9-

70.2. 4. The term “Department of Plans and Public Works” is replaced with “Building and Safety Division” in section 9-69.2.

SECTION 5: Monterey City Code, Chapter 9, section 9-78 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Permit Procedure.

The Community Development Director shall review the permit application and shall approve the permit unless evidence is available which indicates that the proposed grading or excavation will create an undue risk to the health and safety of the public at large. Prior to acting on any such application, the Chief of Inspection Services/Building Official, in his/her sole discretion, may set and conduct a public hearing for the purpose of receiving comments on the proposed grading and excavation. Except as otherwise indicated in Section 9-80, any permit issued hereunder shall be subject to the following conditions:
(a) All excavation and grading shall be performed solely in accordance with the permit approved by the City and in accordance with the permit as issued by the City. (b) Prior to movement of any soil on any property located within a district, the permittee or designee shall personally deliver to each person who intends to work on the property described in the permit the notice and safety plan, which is attached as an exhibit to the permit, and explain to each such person the information set forth in that notice. (c) The permittee may not move or disturb soil in a manner inconsistent with restrictions placed on the property by the Army and as noted on the grading district map unless there is a Department of Defense certified, or equivalent, explosive ordnance disposal technician acceptable to the Chief of Inspection Services/Building Official who is on site and visually supervises any such activity. Any excavation or soil disturbance inconsistent with restrictions placed on the property by the Army may be accomplished only after investigation using sweep lanes no wider than five feet throughout the excavation area and after using detection devices and visual identification to locate, identify and remove any unexploded ordnance discovered during such excavation activity.
(d) The permittee shall cease soil disturbance activities and shall notify the Army and DTSC of any suspected unexploded ordnance discovered during any excavation or soil removal immediately upon discovery. The permittee shall coordinate appropriate response actions with the Army and DTSC.
(e) No later than thirty days following the completion of the permitted soil disturbance activity, the permittee shall prepare and file with the Chief of Inspection Services/Building Official, the Army and DTSC an after action report that shall state whether and where UXO was detected and the extent and depth of UXO response actions undertaken and completed on the property that is the subject of the permit. The after action report shall include site maps to illustrate the information contained in the report. All after action reports prepared and filed in accordance with this chapter shall be deemed public records. (f) The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance of a permit to defend at its sole expense, indemnify and hold harmless from any liability the City, and reimburse the City for any expenses incurred resulting from or in connection with the approval of the project including any claim, suit or legal proceeding. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of its obligations under this subsection.”
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 5, Packet Page 5 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 9, Packet Page 12 SECTION 6: Monterey City Code, Chapter 25, Section 25-1.06 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“The City Manager, City Attorney, and Library Director (notwithstanding the Board of Library Trustee’s power to appoint and remove library personnel pursuant to Section

7.1(c) of the City Charter) have primary responsibility for appointment and removal of officers and employees within their respective departments as established in the City Charter. The City Manager, City Attorney, and Library Director shall each be responsible for administering these Rules and Regulations within their department and scope of authority, except as appropriately delegated to subordinate officers and employees. All duties and authority of the City Manager established in these Rules and Regulations shall apply equally to the City Attorney and Library Director in administering these Rules and Regulations to employees of their respective departments.” SECTION 7: Monterey City Code, Chapter 25, Section 25-2.10 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“The Classified Service shall consist of all employees who have been appointed to regular full-time or regular part-time positions except:
a. The City Manager.
b. The City Attorney.
c. The Library Director.
d. All other positions designated as Executive Management in the City’s annual salary schedule.
e. All elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions and committees.
f. All temporary personnel whether employed directly by the City or retained under contract for services, except as provided in the contract for services. g. All volunteer personnel.”
SECTION 8: Monterey City Code, Chapter 25, Section 25-2.14 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“The following are, for purposes of definition, the department heads for the City of Monterey
a. City Manager.
b. Assistant City Manager.
c. City Attorney.
d. Finance Director.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 6, Packet Page 6 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 10, Packet Page 13 4 e. Fire Chief.
f. Library Director.
g. Parks and Recreation Director.
h. Human Resources Director.
i. Police Chief.
j. Community Development Director.
k. Public Works Director.”
SECTION 9: Monterey City Code, Chapter 25, Section 25-3.03(d)(1) is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Complaint Regarding Department Head (Other than City Manager, City Attorney, or Human Resources Director). Any time a department head is the accused perpetrator of an incident of discrimination, harassment, abusive conduct/bullying, or retaliation under the definitions of this policy, the complaint shall be made to the Human Resources Director who shall investigate the complaint and make a recommendation for the disposition of the complaint to the City Manager, or to the Board of Library Trustees if the complaint concerns the Library Director.”
SECTION 10: Monterey City Code, Chapter 25, Section 25-3.03(d)(4) is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Complaint Regarding Member of Council, or Member of a Board, Committee or Commission. If a member of the City Council or a member of a City Board, Committee, or Commission is the accused perpetrator of an incident of discrimination, harassment, abusive conduct/bullying or retaliation under the definitions of this policy, the complaint shall be made to the City Attorney or Human Resources Director, who shall retain outside counsel to investigate the allegations and file a recommendation to the City Council for action on the complaint.

SECTION 11: Monterey City Code, Chapter 25, Section 25-3.08(d)(4) is hereby added to read as follows:
“Immediate family members of the members of the Board of Library Trustees may hold positions in the City except for the Library Director position.” SECTION 12: Monterey City Code, Chapter 25, Section 25-7.01(c) is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Promotional examinations shall be open only to qualified, regular City employees unless, at the discretion of the Human Resources Director, it is open to application by temporary/seasonal employees. Applications may be accepted from qualified employees on probation subject to the provisions of City Code section 25-10.06.” Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 7, Packet Page 7 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 11, Packet Page 14 SECTION 13: Monterey City Code, Chapter 25, Section 25-14.10 is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Appeal to the City Council or Board of Library Trustees a. Definitions. Appeal Authority for Library personnel means the Board of Library Trustees. The Appeal Authority for other personnel is the City Council. For appeals involving Library personnel, the term “Clerk” in the below procedures denotes the Library personnel serving as the Clerk to the Board of Library Trustees. For appeals involving other personnel, the term “Clerk” as used in this section means the City Clerk. b. Decisions of the City Manager which result in termination may be appealed to the Appeal Authority. Disciplinary actions initiated by the City Manager, except oral and written reprimands and actions not involving loss of pay, may be appealed to the Appeal Authority. This appeal shall be in writing and filed with the Clerk within ten (10) City working days of receipt of the City Manager’s decision. The appeal shall be signed by the employee and shall set forth the reasons for the appeal. The Clerk shall provide written notice of the appeal to the Appeal Authority, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the employee’s department head, the Human Resources Director, and to any other appropriate parties. c. Upon the filing of an appeal, the Clerk shall notice a hearing of the appeal within fifteen (15) City working days, and the hearing shall be held not less than ten (10) City working days nor more than forty-five (45) City working days from the date of the Clerk’s notice. The Clerk’s notice shall include the date, time and place of the hearing. Once commenced, the hearing may be continued until it can be completed.
d. The Appeal Authority’s hearing shall be closed, unless requested to be open by the employee. Formal rules of evidence shall not apply. Principles of due process will be applied.

Provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act, the City Charter, and the City Code shall apply to all such hearings.
e. The Appeal Authority shall render its decision in writing to the employee within ten (10) City working days after the conclusion of the hearing. Appropriate copies of the decision will be furnished to the City Manager, Human Resources Director, and department head of the employee. The decision will also be reported in open session of the Appeal Authority in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and the City Code. f. In rendering its decision, the Appeal Authority may reaffirm the disciplinary action, reverse it, or modify it.”
SECTION 14: Monterey City Code, Chapter 22, Section 22-31.13, subsection (c)(2) is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Each person employed or retained by a massage establishment to perform massage in or on the premises or through an outcall massage service shall have in their possession the valid current photograph-bearing identification card issued to that employee by the CAMTC. A copy of each such identification card shall also:

A. Be kept in a specific location by management and accessible to any regulatory body performing an inspection; and
B. Be displayed in an open and conspicuous place visible from the main entry Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 8, Packet Page 8 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 12, Packet Page 15 6 door and/or reception and waiting area of the massage establishment. The displayed copy need only include the first name and first letter of the last name. The home address of any employee need not be displayed.” SECTION 15: Monterey City Code, Chapter 32, section 32-55, is hereby amended as follows:
“It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to make any excavation in or under the surface of any street, alley, sidewalk, public way, or public place in the City of Monterey without first obtaining a permit so to do from the City. City may at its discretion require a cash deposit upon issuance of such permit to defray the cost of restoring the surface of said street, alley, sidewalk, public way or public place, as the case may be, to its former condition.

SECTION 16: Monterey City Code, Chapter 32, sections 32-56; 32-57; and 32-60 are hereby amended by replacing the phrase “Department of Plans and Public Works” with “City.” SECTION 17: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, is hereby amended to read as follows:

1. Section 33-8, subsection (b) is amended to read as follows: “The Public Works Director shall be responsible for analyzing the design and the Community Development Director is responsible for coordinating the processing of minor subdivision maps, preliminary maps, and tentative maps. The Public Works Director shall be responsible for coordinating and processing of final maps and parcel maps.” a. The phrase “Public Works Director” is replaced with “Community Development and Public Works Directors” in sections 33-5, 33-8(e), 33-28, 33-49, 33-52, and 33-82.

2. Section 33-7 is amended by replacing the phrase “Public Works Director” with “Community Development Director” in the definition of “Preliminary Map.”

3. Section 33-28 is amended by replacing the phrase “Public Works Director” with “City Forester.”

4. The phrase “Department of Plans and Public Works” is replaced with “Public Works Department” in the following sections:
a. 33-14.5;
b. 33-49;
c. 33-78; and
d. 33-81(a), and (e).

5. The phrase “Plans and Public Works Staff” is replaced with “Public Works Staff” in section 33-14.5.

6. The phrase “Public Works Director or the Planning Commission” is replaced with “Public Works Director, Community Development Director, or the Planning Commission” in section 33-18.

7. The phrase “Public Works Director” is replaced with “Public Works or Community Development Directors” in sections:
a. 33-44;
b. 33-45; and
c. 33-46(a)(1).

8. The phrase “Plans and Public Works Department” is replaced with “Public Works Department” in section 33-81(e).

SECTION 18: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Section 33-50 is hereby amended to Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 9, Packet Page 9 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 13, Packet Page 16 read as follows:
“Filing of preliminary map.

Prior to submitting a tentative map of any proposed standard subdivision, the subdivider shall submit to the Community Development and Public Works Director three copies of a preliminary map for review, along with such additional materials, data, reports or the like as the Public Works or Community Development Directors may require.” SECTION 19: Monterey City Code, Chapter 38 is hereby amended as follows:

1. The phrase “Department of Plans and Public Works” is replaced with “Community Development Department” in the following sections:
a. 38-2.B;
b. 38-22.E;
c. 38-23.G;
d. 38-24.E;
e. 38-25.F;
f. 38-26.F;
g. 38-26.M.3.a;
h. 38-28.D;
i. 38-29.D;
j. 38-30.D;
k. 38-31.D;
l. 38-41.F;
m. 38-46;
n. 38-50;
o. 38-64;
p. 38-75 – subsections D.1, G.2.a.(1), and G.2.b.(2);
q. 38-76 – subsections G.2.a.(1) and G.2.b.(2);
r. 38-77.C.1;
s. 38-90;
t. 38-126 subsections D.6 and F;
u. 38-150;
v. 38-155;
w. 38-159.C.2;
x. 38-170.A;
y. 38-186.A;
z. 38-208;
aa. 38-210 subsections B and C;

2. The phrase “Public Works Director” is replaced with “Community Development Director” in sections:
a. 38-5.E;
b. 38-7.A;
c. 38-7.B.5;
d. 38-7.D; and
e. 38-7.E.
f. 38-11 (Lot, Corner);
g. 38-12;
h. 38-16.D;
i. 38-22.B ‘R-E District Land Use Regulations’;
j. 38-23.B ‘R-1 District Land Use Regulations’;
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 10, Packet Page 10 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 14, Packet Page 17 8 k. 38-26.M.3.a;
l. 38-26.K.3.a;
m. 38-28.B.3 ‘C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District Land Use Regulations,’ ‘Temporary Uses’;
n. 38-29.B.3 ‘C-2 Community Commercial District Land Use Regulations’; o. 38-30.B.3 ‘C-3 General Commercial District Land Use Regulations,’ ‘Temporary Uses’;
p. 38-31.B.3 ‘CO Office and Professional District Land Use Regulations,’ ‘Temporary Uses’;
q. 38-32.B.1 ‘CR Cannery Row District Land Use Regulations,’ ‘Temporary Uses’;
r. 38-33.C.3.c;
s. 38-33.D – subsections 2 and 5;
t. 38-33.E.2 – subsections (c) and (e);
u. 38-40.B ‘I-R District Land Use Regulations,’ ‘Temporary Uses’; v. 38-41.B – subsections 1, 2, and 4;
w. 38-44 ‘O Districts Land Use Regulations,’ ‘Temporary Uses’; x. 38-57;
y. 38-73.M;
z. 38-73.Q;
aa. 38-74b – subsections A, B.2, and D.1;
bb. 38-75 – subsections D.1, G.2.a.(2), and G.2.d;
cc. 38-76 – subsections G.2.a.(2) and G.2.d;
dd. 38-85;
ee. 38-109.A;
ff. 38-111 – subsections A.2, 4, and 5; D.1, and J;
gg. 38-115 (introductory paragraph) and ‘Horticulture, Limited’; hh. 38-116.B and D;
ii. 38-119.A;
jj. 38-120.C;
kk. 38-125;
ll. 38-130;
mm. 38-131.B;
nn. 38-133;
oo. 38-136.B;
pp. 38-137;
qq. 38-151;
rr. 38-153, title, and subsections A, B, C.1, C.15, and C.17; ss. 38-157;
tt. 38-159.A, B, and E;
uu. 38-160;
vv. 38-162;
ww. 38-162.D;
xx. 38-165.A and B.4;
yy. 38-166.B;
zz. 38-170, subsections A.1, A.2, and B;
aaa. 38-171.B;
bbb. 38-172.A;
ccc. 38-174.B;
ddd. 38-180.B;
eee. 38-182.A.1;
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 11, Packet Page 11 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 15, Packet Page 18 fff. 38-185;
ggg. 38-186.B;
hhh. 38-195;
iii. 38-197.A and C.3;
jjj. 38-198.A;
kkk. 38-208;
lll. 38-210.B;
mmm. 38-214.D;
nnn. 38-216.A;
ooo. 38-217;
ppp. 38-219; and
qqq. 38-221.A.

3. The phrase “Director of Plans and Public Works” is replaced with “Community Development Director” in the definition of Floor Area Ratio in section 38-11.

4. The phrase “Public Works Director” is replaced with “Community Development Director” in the definition of Public Works Director in section 38-11 and the resulting new definition of Community Development Director is sorted in alphabetical order.

5. The phrase “Community Development Department” is replaced with “Public Works Department” in section 38-26.M.3.a
SECTION 20: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 21: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 12, Packet Page 12 ATTACHMENT 1
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 16, Packet Page 19 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№07/19
ADDING MONTEREY CITY CODE SECTION 22-26.6 TO PROHIBIT SITTING OR LYING

DOWN ON THE FLOOR INSIDE PUBLIC RESTROOMS
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, the City of Monterey has 33 public restrooms, and it strives to maintain its public restrooms in a clean and sanitary condition;
WHEREAS, the floors of public restrooms are to be maintained, so far as practicable, in a dry condition, free of solid or liquid wastes, garbage, rodents, insects, and vermin to avoid creating a menace to public health;
WHEREAS, unobstructed public access to toilet facilities and sinks is imperative to protecting public health and welfare. Public restroom use helps to prevent people from defecating and urinating in public;
WHEREAS, public restrooms are occasionally inhospitable due to individuals sitting or lying down on the restroom floors, which blocks public access to toilet stalls or sinks. It also interferes with City staff from being able to properly clean restroom facilities. Lying down or sitting on the restroom floor are incompatible uses of a public restroom; WHEREAS, present laws that prohibit loitering in public restrooms do not adequately address the safety hazards, disruption, and deterrence to users of public restrooms caused by persons sitting or lying on restroom floors; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project.

NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

SECTION 2: The foregoing recitals are adopted as findings of the City Council as though set forth fully herein.

Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 2.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 1, Packet Page 13 ATTACHMENT 2
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 17, Packet Page 20 2 SECTION 3: Monterey City Code, Chapter 22, Article 1, Section 22-26.6, “Sitting or Lying on Public Restroom Floor” is hereby added to read as follows:
“(a) Prohibited. To protect public health and safety, no person shall sit or lie on the floor inside a public restroom.
(b) Exceptions. The prohibition in subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to any person whose conduct arises out of a medical emergency.”
SECTION 4: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 5: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 2, Packet Page 14 ATTACHMENT 2
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 18, Packet Page 21 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Authorize Remote Teleconference Meetings of the City Council and Boards, Commissions, and Committees for the Period July 9, 2022 through July 21, 2022 Pursuant to AB361 Ralph M. Brown Act Provisions (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council consider the state of the COVID-19 emergency and adopt a resolution to authorize remote teleconference attendance for all public meetings of City of Monterey legislative bodies under emergency-specific Brown Act provisions for the period of July 9, 2022 through July 21, 2022. This action is required to comply with the Brown Act.

VALUE DRIVERS:

This action aligns with the City’s Value Driver to: “in collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.”
Furthermore, it is consistent with the City’s Strategic Priority to “ensure the health and wellness of the community including the COVID-19 pandemic response through emergency operations, clear communication with the public, delivering vaccinations, supporting testing efforts, issuing emergency orders, managing social distancing regulations, adopting eviction protections, hosting blood drives, and providing food security.”
POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The recommendations in this report are consistent with the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code section 54950 through 54963). The City’s policy is to ensure the public’s health, safety, and welfare of its employees, residents, and visitors. Continuing to authorize remote attendance of public meetings will help reduce the spread of COVID-19.

Government Code section 54953(e)(3) requires the city to make certain findings to continue with the emergency teleconferencing provisions of the Brown Act: to consider the circumstances of the state of emergency, and any of the following circumstances must exist (1) the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of members to meet safely in person and (2) state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There is no new or additional cost associated with offering free and secure teleconferencing participation in the City’s public meetings through toll-free telephone and internet-based ZoomGov webinars and free live-streamed meeting observation on cable access television and/or on the internet via YouTube when possible. The City currently pays $5,500 annually for the ZoomGov webinar accounts and toll-free phone access used for public meetings. Live Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 3.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 1, Packet Page 15 ATTACHMENT 3
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 19, Packet Page 22 streaming of public meetings on Comcast Channel 25 is provided under an ongoing public, educational, and government (“PEG”) cable access agreement with Access Monterey Peninsula, Inc. In 2021, the City contributed around $240,000 towards Access Monterey Peninsula.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Upon consideration of the state of emergency, the Council may choose not to authorize emergency teleconference attendance of meetings. This would mean that meetings held after July 8, 2022 (the expiration date of Resolution No. 22-063 C.S.) would be subject to Government Code section 54953(b)(3) pre-COVID-19 Brown Act noticing and quorum requirements for teleconference attendance at public meetings by elected and appointed officials of the City’s legislative bodies.

DISCUSSION:

Background
The Ralph M. Brown Act requires local government business to be conducted at open and public meetings with few exceptions. The COVID-19 pandemic presented significant health and safety concerns that made public gatherings unsafe. This resulted in the City of Monterey and many other public agencies holding public meetings with remote attendance methods authorized in Governor Newsom’s emergency executive orders to protect attendees' health and safety.

In September 2021, the Brown Act was amended by Assembly Bill 361 (“AB 361”), authorizing the city and other public agencies to continue to allow teleconference attendance at public meetings if the legislative body makes certain findings. Accordingly, the City Council has adopted resolutions with the required findings at least every 30 days from October 5, 2021, to June 7, 2022. During this period, attendance was primarily conducted in a hybrid format, allowing both in-person and teleconference attendance. (Omicron presented a brief exception from mid-January to the end of March 2022.) This flexibility has ensured transparent, healthy, and safe public access to the city’s meetings and meetings of its legislative bodies. The current teleconferencing authorization is effective through July 8, 2022. Findings regarding the COVID19 state of emergency will continue to be agendized for Council consideration at least every 30 days as required by State law as long as the state of emergency is in place and until the Council Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 2, Packet Page 16 ATTACHMENT 3
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 20, Packet Page 23 determines conditions are safe to return to non-pandemic Brown Act provisions for the city’s public meetings.

The ZoomGov platform currently used by the City for teleconference meeting attendance allows for participation that is free, broadly accessible, safe, and secure. The Council and public are able to attend meetings remotely using any internet-accessible device or by dialing toll-free on the telephone and remain socially distanced while engaging in important public discourse.

Current Findings
Facts supporting continued authorization for teleconferencing pursuant to Government Code section 54954(e)(3)(B)(i) are:
 The Omicron variant of the virus was classified by the World Health Organization (“WHO”) as a Variant of Concern on November 26, 2021, was identified in the United States as reported by the CDC on December 1, 2021, and six lineages of the Omicron variant constituted 99.9% of COVID-19 cases in the United States as of May 28, 2022, as reported by the CDC on June 14, 2022.
 According to Monterey County’s COVID-19 Biweekly Update updated on June 16, 2022, the COVID-19 case rate in Monterey County is 26.7 cases per 100,000 people with a test positivity rate of 9.4% (7-day average for both statistics), with 26 people currently hospitalized.

Staff recommends that the City Council consider the current state of the COVID-19 emergency and, in order to protect the health and safety of public meeting attendees, adopt the attached resolution to authorize emergency teleconference attendance of public meetings through July 21, 2022.

CBK
Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution
cc: All City boards, commissions, and committees
Neighborhood Associations
Business Associations
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 3, Packet Page 17 ATTACHMENT 3
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 21, Packet Page 24 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY

AUTHORIZE REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS

OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 9 THROUGH JULY 21, 2022
PURSUANT TO AB 361 RALPH M. BROWN ACT PROVISIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council is empowered to take actions necessary to protect and has an important governmental interest in protecting the health, safety, and welfare of those who participate in meetings of the City Council and its legislative bodies subject to California Government Code sections 54950-54963 (the Ralph M. Brown Act, or “Brown Act”); WHEREAS, on October 5, 2021, November 2, 2021, November 16, 2021, December 7, 2021, December 21, 2021, January 18, 2022, February 15, 2022, March 15, 2022, March 23, 2022, April 19, 2022, May 17, 2022, and June 7, the City Council adopted resolutions authorizing teleconference attendance of public meetings for the City Council and Boards, Commissions and Committees due to the imminent risk to the health and safety of attendees relating to in-person meeting attendance;
WHEREAS, the City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of the COVID-19 emergency;
WHEREAS, the Omicron variant of the virus was classified by the World Health Organization (“WHO”) as a Variant of Concern on November 26, 2021, was identified in the United States as reported by the CDC on December 1, 2021, and six lineages of the Omicron variant constituted 99.9% of COVID-19 cases in the United States as of May 28, 2022, as reported by the CDC on June 14, 2022;
WHEREAS, according to Monterey County’s COVID-19 Biweekly Update updated on June 16, 2022, the COVID-19 case rate in Monterey County is 26.7cases per 100,000 people with a test positivity rate of 9.4% (7-day average for both statistics), with 26 people currently hospitalized;
WHEREAS, the Monterey County Health Department continues to recommend that physical and social distancing strategies be practiced in Monterey County, which includes remote meetings of legislative bodies of local agencies, to the extent possible; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 4, Packet Page 18 ATTACHMENT 3
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 22, Packet Page 25 2 change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.
2 Pursuant to Government Code section 59453(e)(3)(B)(i), the City Council has reviewed the circumstances of the continued state of emergency posed by the spread of COVID-19 and finds that the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the public and members of City legislative bodies to meet safely in person, and holding meetings exclusively in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees.

3. The City Council authorizes remote teleconferencing public meetings of the City Council and city boards, commissions, and committees pursuant to Government Code section 59453(e)(1). This Resolution expires on July 21, 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this __ day of ______, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 5, Packet Page 19 ATTACHMENT 3
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 23, Packet Page 26 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Christy Sabdo, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Authorize Professional Services Agreements with Michael Baker International Inc. for a Not to Exceed Amount of $200,000, To Provide On-Call Housing Program Consultant Services (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing a professional services agreement with Michael Baker International Inc. for a not-to-exceed amount of $200,000, to provide on-call housing program consultant services for the City’s Community Development Department.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Support efforts and policies that provide equitable access to affordable housing in Monterey and the region.

Provide sufficient resources and support to develop, retain, and recruit a high quality city workforce.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Awarding professional services agreements is consistent with past Council policy and is used for other types of professional services for projects throughout the City. These services will augment the City’s capacity for project delivery, consistent with the City Council’s vision and strategic initiative of “Working to improve the quality of life of our residents.” FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The City's Housing Office receives Community Development Block Grant monies from the federal government and return on previous investments. For example, as a low-income unit is sold, the City will receive its original investment returned and then the unit is offered for sale again to a low-income household. The City periodically needs technical assistance in these areas with reporting and the Council approves the annual housing budget to cover these services. No additional budget allocation is needed to cover the required services.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 4., Item Page 1, Packet Page 20 ATTACHMENT 4
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 24, Packet Page 27 CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could decide that professional services for on-call housing program consultant services are not required at this time.

DISCUSSION:

On January 31, 2022, staff circulated the RFP for On-Call Planning, Economic, Housing, and Environmental Services. Firms that provide the desired services were specifically contacted.

The RFP was posted through the City’s new e-Procurement Portal, OpenGov Procurement and on the City’s website. By the March 2, 2022 deadline, responses were received from twelve firms. Of the twelve firms, not all of the proposals included housing services, and of those firms that did include a proposal to provide housing services, the proposals didn’t specifically address the City’s needs for on-call housing services. The City re-issued an RFP on April 26, 2022 for housing program consultant services that included a more detailed scope of work explaining the City’s needs. By the May 23, 2022 deadline, responses were received from one firm.

Michael Baker International Inc. has been selected to provide the full range of housing program consulting services as requested in the City’s proposal. This firm has been providing on-call housing program consulting services on an as-needed basis for the past 10 years, more recently to assist the City with the administration of the City’s annual CDBG grant received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and the CARES Act funding the City received due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The agreement will have an initial one-year term and a $200,000 aggregate not-to-exceed fee for all tasks provided. The agreement will include an option for two additional one (1) year extensions also with an annual not-to-exceed funding limit of $200,000.

KC/SAB
Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution
e: William Hoose, AICP, Office Executive, Associate Vice President, Michael Baker International Inc.

Damien Delany, Housing Department Manager, Michael Baker International Inc.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
1 AUTHORIZING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $200,000, TO PROVIDE ONCALL HOUSING PROGRAM CONSULTANT SERVICES WHEREAS, the Planning Office needs to augment its planning staff to provide housing program consultant services;
WHEREAS, on January 31, 2022, the City released a Request for Proposals (RFP) to firms that provide the desired services and also posted the RFP on the City’s new eProcurement Portal, OpenGov Procurement, and the City’s website. By the March 2, 2022 deadline, responses were received from twelve firms. Of the twelve firms, not all of the proposals included housing services, and of those firms that did include a proposal to provide housing services, the proposals didn’t specifically address the City’s needs for on-call housing services;
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2022, the City re-issued an RFP for housing program consultant services that included a more detailed scope of work explaining the City’s needs; WHEREAS, on May 23, 2022, responses were received from one firm; a selection committee consisting of planning staff reviewed and scored the responses; the selection committee held deliberations; and, Michael Baker International Inc. was found to be qualified; WHEREAS, Michael Baker International Inc. has experience providing a full range of housing consultant services in California and are familiar with Monterey. This firm has been providing on-call housing program consulting services on an as-needed basis for the past 10 years, more recently to assist the City with the administration of the City’s annual CDBG grant received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and the CARES Act funding the City received due to the COVID-19 pandemic; WHEREAS, the agreement will have an initial one-year term and a $200,000 aggregate not-to-exceed fee for all tasks provided. The agreement will include an option for two additional one (1) year extensions also with an annual not-to-exceed funding limit of $200,000; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 4., Item Page 3, Packet Page 22 ATTACHMENT 4
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 26, Packet Page 29 projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that is hereby authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Michael Baker International Inc. to provide professional services to provide on-call housing program consultant services, for one year with two one-year extensions, for a not to exceed amount of $200,000 each year.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this 21st day of June, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 4., Item Page 4, Packet Page 23 ATTACHMENT 4
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 27, Packet Page 30 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Steve Wittry, PE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Sara South, Engineering Programs Analyst
SUBJECT: Ratify Payment to Precision Grade, Inc. for the David/Spencer Curb Extensions Project, NIP2013 (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***NCIP***
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution ratifying payment to Precision Grade, Inc. for the David/Spencer Curb Extensions Project (NIP2013), in the amount of $107,384, which exceeds the contract value authorized in Resolution 22-020.

VALUE DRIVERS:

QUALITY OF LIFE – In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This project is consistent with the City Council’s Quality of Life Strategic Priorities to "recognize that public safety is a priority to ensure that our City is safe and welcoming to all, contributing to our economic vitality as a destination City" and to "prepare for emergencies and community resiliency."
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

All work performed under this contract is fully funded by Measure P/S and the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) project. No additional appropriations are required.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Categorical Exemption:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project proposes the improvement of existing curbs at the intersection of David Avenue and Spencer Street, specifically the removal of the existing curbs and gutters, and asphalt concrete pavement and base; and the construction of new ADA curb ramps and bulb outs to improve street alignment and shorten pedestrian crossing distance. The project includes traffic paint to mark pedestrian crossings, and stormwater infrastructure improvements. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 5.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 5., Item Page 1, Packet Page 24 ATTACHMENT 5
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 28, Packet Page 31 Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project involves the removal and replacement of curb ramps to improve ADA accessibility; therefore, no new expansion will take place.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to the improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The proposed improvements are at grade and would replace pavement in-kind; therefore, no impacts to scenic highways will occur.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impacts to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code would occur.

The improvements would occur in the public right-of-way; there would be no impacts to any historic structures. The work would require digging for a new manhole and connections to existing stormwater infrastructure in the public right-of-way; however, the project will include archeological monitoring during any digging. Therefore, impacts to archaeological resources would not occur.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

There are no alternatives to consider.

DISCUSSION:

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 5., Item Page 2, Packet Page 25 ATTACHMENT 5
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 29, Packet Page 32 On January 18, 2022, Council adopted Resolution 22-020, awarding a construction contract to Precision Grade, Inc. for the base bid only for the Citywide Curb Ramp Project, Phase 5 in the amount of $385,200, and authorized staff to expend an additional 15% for unforeseen construction contingencies.

The Citywide Curb Ramp Project, Phase 5 is a project similar in scope and in close proximity to the project area for the David/Spencer Curb Extensions Project. Therefore, during the course of construction, staff instructed Precision Grade, Inc. to complete the additional work at the intersection of David and Spencer, for an additional cost of $107,384. This additional cost exceeds the contract amount previously authorized in Resolution 22-020. The requested authorization is fully funded through the NCIP Project account. Measures have been put in place to eliminate this kind of oversight in the future.

Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ratifying payment to Precision Grade, Inc. for the David/Spencer Curb Extensions Project (NIP2013), in the amount of $107,384, which exceeds the contract value authorized in Resolution 22-020.

SW/SS/mb
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Precision Grade, Inc.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№08/22
RATIFY PAYMENT TO PRECISION GRADE, INC. FOR THE DAVID/SPENCER

CURB EXTENSIONS PROJECT
WHEREAS, on January 18, 2022, Council adopted Resolution 22-020, awarding a construction contract to Precision Grade, Inc. for the base bid only for the Citywide Curb Ramp Project, Phase 5 in the amount of $385,200, and authorized staff to expend an additional 15% for unforeseen construction contingencies;
WHEREAS, the Citywide Curb Ramp Project, Phase 5 is similar in scope and in close proximity to the project area for the David/Spencer Curb Extensions Project; WHEREAS, during the course of construction, staff instructed Precision Grade, Inc. to complete the additional work at the intersection of David and Spencer, for an additional cost of $107,384;
WHEREAS, the additional cost exceeds the contract amount previously authorized in Resolution 22-020;
WHEREAS, in the future, staff will adhere to proper processes and contracts; WHEREAS, the requested authorization is fully funded through the NCIP Project account (NIP2013); and,
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project proposes the improvement of existing curbs at the intersection of David Avenue and Spencer Street, specifically the removal of the existing curbs and gutters, and asphalt concrete pavement and base; and the construction of new ADA curb ramps and bulb outs to improve street alignment and shorten pedestrian crossing distance. The project includes traffic paint to mark pedestrian crossings, and stormwater infrastructure improvements.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 5., Item Page 4, Packet Page 27 ATTACHMENT 5
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 31, Packet Page 34 2 Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 5., Item Page 5, Packet Page 28 ATTACHMENT 5
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 32, Packet Page 35 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby ratifies payment to Precision Grade, Inc. for the David/Spencer Curb Extensions Project (NIP2013), in the amount of $107,384, which exceeds the contract value authorized in Resolution 22-020.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 5., Item Page 6, Packet Page 29 ATTACHMENT 5
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 33, Packet Page 36 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Rafaela T. King, Finance Director
Prepared By: Carol Hewitt, Finance Analyst
Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
Brian Nelson, Acting Harbormaster
Inga Waite, Library & Museums Director
Cristie Steffy, Parking Superintendent
Karen Larson, Parks and Recreation Director
SUBJECT: Amend and Restate Resolution 22-024, the Master Fee Schedule, to Amend the City Clerk, Harbor, Library/Museums, Parking, and Cemetery Division Fee Schedules (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a Resolution to amend the specified City Clerk, Harbor, Library & Museum, Parking, and Cemetery division fees, effective July 1, 2022, and the CPI amendments shall be automatically applied annually effective July 1, 2023.

The attached Resolution amends only the City Clerk, Harbor, Library & Museums, Parking, and Cemetery division Fee Schedules; it does not alter any other fees previously adopted by the City Council.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

Aligning the City's fee structure with Elections Code provisions helps to ensure transparent elections processes in line with the City's Value Driver to "foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all." POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with the City policy and practice to recover costs reasonably borne to provide regulations, products, or services as set forth in 19-102. “Costs reasonably borne” include direct and indirect costs, including but not limited to maintenance, contracted services, salaries and supplies.

Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 6.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 1, Packet Page 30 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 34, Packet Page 37 This recommendation is consistent with the following Elections Code provision for filing an initiative petition Notice of Intent: "the filer of such Notice of Intent shall pay a fee to be established by the legislative body not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200) to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition." (Elections Code section 9202(b)) The proposed changes to the Public Works Harbor fee schedule are consistent with Monterey City Code section 17, Harbor and Marina, which instructs that the associated fees be set by resolution, and Section 19-103 (IV) (2,3) instruct that the percentage of cost reasonably borne for Outer Harbor Mooring and the Marina be set by resolution.

The proposed change to the public use fee for the Pacific Biological Laboratories is consistent City Council Resolution 00-159 which “authorizes and directs the collection of fees for the public use of the building and site at 800 Cannery Row to cover the cost of staff time in opening, monitoring and closing the lab when used by Non-City organizations.” The proposed adjustments to fees listed in library policies as recommended to City Council by the Board of Library Trustees is consistent with City Charter section 7.1, which grants the Board authority to “make and enforce such bylaws, rules and regulations as it may deem necessary for the administration of the Monterey Public Library program, and Board of Library Trustees Policy 603: Review, Formulation, and Adoption of Policies, which directs the Board to review and revise policies as necessary.

In the Parking Division, staff is recommending the addition of modest fees for electric vehicle charging to cover costs reasonably borne.

In the Cemetery Division, staff is recommending the addition of modest fees for new services to cover the costs reasonably borne as well as the removal of fees for services that are obsolete.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

City Clerk Office - Establishing a deposit for filing a notice of intent to circulate initiative.

The modest deposit fee of $200, pursuant to Elections Code section 9202(b), will contribute toward costs associated with the staff time involved in administering an initiative petition that is not certified sufficient within one year. In the instance that an initiative petition process is completed and certified sufficient within one year, the deposit fee will be refunded to the filer.

Public Works Harbor - Fee Amendments
Based on an average of these sporadically used as-needed fees, the proposed increase in these rates could generate an additional estimated $18,500 annually to support cost recovery in performing these services. Ten of these fees, which have remained fixed for several years, would increase by the CPI in subsequent years.

No fiscal impact anticipated for removing “Marina Gate Key/Hoist Key” as the Harbor only has one type of key and will be combined with the “Marina Shower Key” categorization. No fiscal impact is anticipated for removing city mooring quarterly/yearly rates and crane fees since these rates are not used. No fiscal impact is anticipated for removing the East Mooring Rate for 55’ and larger vessels as most of the vessels participating in this program have been below 50’ and will be less than 45’ this year and in following years.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 2, Packet Page 31 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 35, Packet Page 38 Library & Museums – Fee Amendments
Based on an average of the four fiscal years before the pandemic (FY16 through FY19), the proposed increase in public use fees for the Pacific Biological Laboratories would generate approximately $1,400 annually to support the Museums & Cultural Arts Division’s staffing expenses.

No fiscal impact is anticipated from the proposed corrections to fees listed in Board of Trustees Policies 125: Replacement of Lost or Damaged Library Materials and 175: Loan of Laptops, Telescopes and Other Devices. Based on an average of the four fiscal years before the pandemic (FY16 through FY19), the proposed increase in library card fees to non-California residents would generate approximately $280 annually.

Parking Division – Electric Vehicle Charging Fees
The City is currently providing the public with free access to four complimentary Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations, which is no longer fiscally sustainable. The City may be losing more than $100,000 per year by providing free electricity to EV users. Therefore, staff recommends an EV charging rate of $0.36 per kWh and a $0.50 per minute fee for idling beyond a grace period. This could generate up to $30,000 in cost recovery per charging station ($120,000 per year for the four existing stations) and potentially more when additional charging stations are installed.

Cemetery Division – Based on estimated demand for the new Cemetery services, the proposed fees could generate an estimated $25,000 annually to support cost recovery in performing these services.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
[CEQA determination paragraph approved by Planning Division] The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council could choose not to establish the deposit fee, however, this is not recommended as the Elections Code provides that the filer "shall" pay a fee.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 3, Packet Page 32 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 36, Packet Page 39 The Council could choose not to approve the Harbor rate increases, however this is not recommended as these rates have not been updated for several years and these increases will allow for cost recovery. Another option is Council could recommend different fees for the Harbor.

The Council could choose not to approve the proposed increase to public use fees for the Pacific Biological Laboratories, however staff does not recommend that option as the current fee has not kept pace with the cost to cover staff time.

The Council could choose not to approve the minor fee revisions proposed by the Board of Library Trustees, however this is not recommended as the fee changes in Policies 125 and 175 are corrections while the library card fee charged to non-California residents (Policy 120) has not been updated for 20 years.

For electric vehicle charging rates, Council could choose not to approve fees or set alternative rates. Higher rates above the $0.36 per kWh recommendation may discourage users from charging their vehicles in the lot, thereby reducing revenue and efforts to encourage electric vehicle use. Lower rates below $0.36 per kWh may result in the City not recovering the cost of electricity and charging station operations. Continuing to provide free electric vehicle charging to residents is not recommended, since it is no longer fiscally sustainable.

The Council could choose not to implement fees for new services such as the ossuary (scattering garden), however, this is not recommended since demand and space for full burials may diminish, while services for the ossuary or other inurnments will continue to generate much needed revenue to offset the cost of offering cemetery services to the public.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed fee amendments from the four divisions are presented in Attachment 2. The Master Fee Schedule, with the proposed fee amendments incorporated, is presented in Attachment 3. The approved amendments would be effective July 1, 2022, and the CPI amendments would be applied the following fiscal year, effective July 1, 2023. A discussion of each division’s proposals follows.

City Clerk Office - Establishing a deposit for filing a notice of intent to circulate initiative The initiative petition process outlined in the California Elections Code, which if successful results in a measure being placed onto the City ballot, includes a requirement to file a Notice of Intent with the elections official prior to circulation of the petition. Pursuant to Elections Code section 9202(b), the filer of such Notice of Intent "shall pay a fee to be established by the legislative body not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200) to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition." The $200 deposit fee should be added to the Administrative Services section of the City's Master Fee Schedule so that it may be paid by the filer in accordance with the payment requirement in the Elections Code.

Harbor - Fee Amendments
The proposed amendments to Harbor fees reflect removal of some categories that are no longer valid, updated cost recovery, revised fee time periods, and the addition of an annual CPI adjustment for specific fees. The City of Monterey no longer rents Outer Harbor Moorings in Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 4, Packet Page 33 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 37, Packet Page 40 excess of 6 months; staff proposes removing the quarterly and annual fees. The Crane fee is no longer needed because the Carry Deck Portable crane was removed from service in 2016 and the asset was sold by the City of Monterey. Since the Marina key services require the same amount of time to register, program, and test, staff recommends combining them into one fee.

East Mooring vessel fee amendments reflect the vessel length limited to up to 45’.

The proposed side-tie transient rates have been updated for cost recovery and removed monthly rates because monthly service is no longer available. The following fees have been updated to include annual CPI adjustments starting July 1, 2023 and for cost recovery including staff time, fuel, equipment, and vessel costs where applicable for: Disabled Vessel Towing; Mooring Inspections and Repairs; Water Removal and the Public Hoist. Mooring customers are responsible for their mooring inspections per City Code section 17-39 (d). Licensees may choose to hire independent inspectors unless they fail to submit mandated inspection report by due date, at which time the City provides inspection services at the established rate.

Library and Museum & Cultural Arts – Fee Amendments
In June 2000 the City council unanimously adopted Resolution 00- 159 authorizing fees for public use of Pacific Biological Laboratories (PBL) or Doc’s Lab. The City allows periodic use of the building and site by non-profit groups, tour groups, and schools under staff supervision. The Resolution directs staff to collect fees to cover the cost of staff time spent opening, monitoring, and closing the facility when used by non-City organizations. The fees were set at “$18 per hour per staff person during regular working hours (8:00 to 5:00 Monday to Friday) and $25 per hour per staff person at other times, including travel time, set-up time, and close-up time. The fees have not been updated since the resolution was adopted. Staff proposes increasing the rate to $35 per hour per staff person from 8:00 to 5:00 Monday through Friday and $60 per hour per staff person at other times to more accurately reflect the current cost of City staff time. It is anticipated that the increase will not discourage groups from visiting the lab, and will more accurately reflect staff costs.

Library Board policies are reviewed and revised as needed in accordance with Board Policy 603: Review, Formulation, and Adoption of Policies. In October 2021 Board Chair Thomson appointed an ad hoc Policy Review Committee to review Board policies, identify those that needed updating, and work with staff to propose revisions. In the course of updating policies, Trustees recommend three minor changes to Library fees listed in the Master Fee Schedule:
- Remove “Youth paperbacks” from the list of material types since the library no longer has a “Youth Paperback” collection (Policy 125: Replacement of Lost or Damaged Library Materials)
- Set a maximum late fine for laptops ($50) in order to be consistent with other maximum fines charged (Policy 175: Loan of Laptops, Telescopes and Other Devices) - Increase the library card fee for individuals residing outside the State of California, from a rate of $5.00 to a rate of $10.00 per month.

Parking – Electric Vehicle Charging Rates
For many years, the City has provided complimentary EV charging to the public at the Calle Principal Garage and the Downtown West Garage. These were installed to incentivize the use of electric vehicles during a time when EVs were less common. However, providing free EV charging to the public is no longer a standard practice as EVs are now commonplace. In fact, Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 5, Packet Page 34 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 38, Packet Page 41 the City is providing as much as $100,000 per year in free electricity to EV drivers and receiving no cost recovery.

It is not fiscally viable for the City to continue subsidizing the cost of EV charging to the public, particularly when many EVs are luxury vehicles that low-to-moderate income earners cannot afford. The City does not provide free fuel to drivers of gas-powered vehicles and should not continue to provide free electricity to drivers of electric vehicles. Based on the cost of electricity, maintenance and operation of EV charging stations, and comparable charging stations on the Monterey Peninsula, staff recommends an EV charging rate of $0.36 per kWh and a $0.50 per minute fee for idling beyond a grace period. The charging rate is comparable to nearby charging stations in Monterey, Pacific Grove, Carmel, and Sand City. The $0.50 per minute fee for idling beyond a grace period ensures that EV users leave the EV charging stall soon after their vehicle has completed charging so that other EV drivers can charge their vehicle.

Cemetery – Fee Amendments
The proposed amendments to Cemetery fees reflect the addition of new services as well as the removal of some categories that are not viable. For example, it is no longer industry standard for monument companies to offer memorial markers that are 12X36X3 inches. Also, the City is not currently equipped to install markers of this size. Additionally, the current fee for ground burials for urns is too high. The price is more expensive than the cost of opening a fully casketed lot using a tractor, dump truck, and labor involved for a casket. Staff recommends the fee be reduced to reflect the services rendered appropriate for an urn.

The ossuary pricing was developed by researching local companies that perform scattering remains at sea. The City fees for ossuary services will generally entail $300 for remains placement, endowment care of $75, and an administrative fee of $30 to ensure records are input into the automated system, etc. Ossuary services offer a more affordable, much-needed burial option for the public that memorializes the location of a loved one.

Conclusion of Staff Recommendations:

Staff recommends the City Council approve revisions to the City Clerk’s Office, Harbor, Library and Museums, and Parking division Fee Schedules to be effective on July 1, 2022, and the CPI amendments shall be automatically applied annually effective July 1, 2023.

RTK/ch/cbk/bn/iw/nr/cs
Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution

2. Proposed Fee Table
e: Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
Brian Nelson, Acting Harbor Master
Inga Waite, Library Director
Cristie Steffy, Parking Superintendent
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 6, Packet Page 35 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 39, Packet Page 42 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22
AMEND AND RESTATE RESOLUTION 22-024, THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE,

TO AMEND THE CITY CLERK, HARBOR, LIBRARY/MUSEUM, PARKING, AND CEMETERY DIVISION FEE SCHEDULES (NOT A PROJECT UNDER CEQA ARTICLE 20, SECTION 15378 AND UNDER GENERAL RULE ARTICLE 5, SECTION 15061)
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 14-132 to establish a Master Fee Schedule;
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution 15-215, which amended and restated Resolution 14-132;
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 21-127, which amended and restated Resolution 15-215;
WHEREAS, on March 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 22-024, which amended and restated Resolution 21-127;
WHEREAS, the City Code calls for a full analysis of costs reasonably borne not less than every five years. Staff conduct cost of services studies to review and calculate the City’s expenditures linked to a particular activity in order to determine the fee amount and cost recovery level. Therefore, from time to time, the Master Fee Schedule has been amended to reflect changes or adjustments to fees as necessary to recover costs pursuant to that policy; WHEREAS, this resolution amends only the City Clerk, Harbor, Library/Museum, Parking, and Cemetery fee schedules; it does not alter any other fees previously adopted by the City Council and those are restated along with the amended fees in Exhibit A to this Resolution; WHEREAS, the City provides a variety of services to the public which benefit the entire community, individuals, or businesses. For certain services such as regulatory fees or recreational activities, the City recovers partially or fully the cost of providing these services, which would have been otherwise paid from the Library and Museum Trust Funds, Marina, Tidelands, Parking, Cemetery, and/or General Fund;
WHEREAS, where required by law, the amount of the new or increased fees and charges is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable cost of the governmental activity, and the manner in which those costs are allocated to the payer’s burden on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity;
WHEREAS, certain fees in the fee schedule are for government services provided directly to the payor that are not provide to those not charged. Where required by law, the amount of these fees do not exceed the reasonable costs to the City of providing the services.

Consequently, pursuant to California Constitution, Art. XIII C, Section 1(e)(2), such fees are not a tax;
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 7, Packet Page 36 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 40, Packet Page 43 2 WHEREAS, Propositions 13, 218, and 26 have placed both substantive and procedural limits on cities’ ability to impose fees and charges. Collectively these constitutional amendments provide safeguards against taxes being imposed without a vote of the people; WHEREAS, Proposition 26 contains a requirement that the local government “bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a levy, charge, or other exaction is not a tax, that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the governmental activity, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payor bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the payor’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity.” (California Constitution, Article XIII C, Section 1); WHEREAS, for the City Clerk Office fee schedule, the initiative petition process outlined in the California Elections Code includes a requirement to file a Notice of Intent with the elections official prior to circulation of the petition, and pursuant to Elections Code section 9202(b), the filer of such Notice of Intent shall pay a fee to be established by the legislative body not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200) to be refunded to the filer if, within one year of the date of filing the notice of intent, the elections official certifies the sufficiency of the petition; WHEREAS, for the Harbor fee schedule, fees have been at fixed rates for several years and these proposed fee increases will allow for cost recovery; WHEREAS, for the Library fee schedule, in the course of updating policies the Board of Library Trustees recommend three minor changes to Library fees: 1) remove the replacement fee for “Youth Paperbacks,” since the Library no longer has a distinct “Youth Paperback” collection, 2) Set a maximum late fine for laptops of $50 in order to be consistent with other fines charged, and 3) Increase the library card fee for individuals residing outside of the State of California from $5 to $10 per month since it has not been updated for 20 years; WHEREAS, for the Museums fee schedule, fees for public use of the Pacific Biological Laboratories have been fixed at the same rate for 22 years and the proposed fee increase will allow for cost recovery;
WHEREAS, for the Parking fee schedule, the City cannot afford to provide electric vehicle charging for the public free of charge, as the City has been supplying as much as $30 of free electricity to each electric vehicle user. The City’s goal is to encourage and provide access to electric vehicle charging stations for the public at a fair price that allows the City to recover its costs for electricity infrastructure;
WHEREAS, for the Cemetery, the Parks and Recreation Department has reviewed current fees and determined that adjustments are required to ensure the City of Monterey recovers the reasonably borne costs for services provided by such fees; WHEREAS, Ground Burials for Caskets and Urns, as well as Ossuary and Niche Inurnment fees are based on a comparison to current local comparator rates, but continue to offer reasonable and fair prices;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 8, Packet Page 37 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 41, Packet Page 44 3 possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY it hereby amends and restates Resolution 22-024 the City Master Fee Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A. The fee amendments shall be effective July 1, 2022 and the CPI amendments shall be automatically applied annually effective July 1, 2023.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 9, Packet Page 38 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 42, Packet Page 45 Master Fee Schedule
Fiscal Year 2022
DRAFT
Administrative Services
Community Development - Permits & Inspections
Community Development - Planning
Community Development & Public Works - General
Library
Monterey Conference Center
Museums & Cultural Arts
Parking
Parks & Recreation
Parks & Recreation - Cemetery
Public Safety - Fire
Public Safety - Police
Public Works - Harbor & Marina
Public Works - Sewer
(INCLUDES PROPOSED FY23 FEE AMENDMENTS)
Bid Protest & Bidder Responsibility Appeals Fees
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 10, Packet Page 39 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 43, Packet Page 46 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
General
Agenda and Minutes Mailing Service1$39.00 per year
Agenda Packet Subscription Service -
Council, Planning Commission,
Arch. Review Committee1$215.50 per year
Agenda Packet Subscription Service -
All other Boards and Commissions $60 per year
Certification of Documents $1.00 per document
Notary Service (per signature) IAW GC 8211 - $15.00
Transparency Reproduction $1.50 each
Fax Service - Send $4 first page, $3 each add'l page
Fax Service - Receive $2 first page, $1 each add'l page CD/DVD Duplication Direct cost (currently $1.00 each)
Publication of optional Candidate Statement in the
Voter Guide
100% of the amount determined by the Monterey
County Elections Department, to be paid by an
advance deposit of the estimated total, and to be
trued up following the County’s issuance of the actual
cost following the election.

NEW FY23 FEE: Deposit for Filing a Notice of Intent to
Circulate Initiative Petition $200
Going-out-of-business or Fire Sale Permit -
initial application (up to 30 days) $25
Going-out-of-business or Fire Sale Permit -
First Renewal (30 to 60 days) $50
Going-out-of-business or Fire Sale Permit -
Second (final) Renewal (60 to 90 days) $10 per day
Duplicate Business License Fee $5
Returned check Processing $10
PW Engineering Maps and Documents $3 per square foot
Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, EIRs, Budgets $20
Photocopying Services - Conference Center $.25 per page Photocopying Services - Public Works $.18 per page (11x17) Photocopying or Printing Services -
All others including Public Records $.10 per page (8.5x11)

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
(2 pages)
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 11, Packet Page 40 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 44, Packet Page 47 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
(2 pages)
Ryan Ranch Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility, 20-
foot space, per month.1$63.00
Ryan Ranch Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility, 25-
foot space, per month.1$79.00
Ryan Ranch Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility, 30-
foot space, per month.1$94.50
Appeal of Marina Decisions to Council equal to fine asessed by Harbormaster Appeal of East Anchorage Decisions to Council equal to fine asessed by Harbormaster Appeal of Yellow Boat Permits to Council equal to fine asessed by Harbormaster Weed Abatement Fee Appeal to be set by resolution
Tobacco Retail License Fee $297
Council Chamber room (includes kitchen, furniture,
projection screen) $100 per session
Basic Sound System (includes 7 mics at dais and 1
lectern mic) $50 per session
Extra microphones (3 table mics 2 handheld mics
available) $20 each per session
Television Broadcast cameras and equipment
(requires Access Monterey Peninsula (AMP)
personnel be separately contracted/retained to
operate equip) $150 per session
Presentation Desk (includes projector, document
camera, and connections for a laptop computer) $100 per session Internet Connection $25 per session
Deposit required to hold the room
(will be applied to final invoice) $50 per reservation
Monterey City Council Chamber Rental Fees - Per Session 8am-6pm or 6pm-12am 1 Fees shall be adjusted annually in July based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The CPI increase shall be based on the published CPI for San Francisco Area (San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) April edition and rounded to the nearest fifty cent (0.50) Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 12, Packet Page 41 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 45, Packet Page 48 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Bid Protest
Purchases of goods, services, public works projects, etc. subject to informal bidding or requests for proposals $100
Public Works Projects subject to formal bidding up to $1 million and formal requests for proposals $250
Public Works Projects over $1 million and less than $5 million $500 Public Works Projects $5 million and over $1,000
Bidder Responsibility Appeals
Purchases of goods, services, public works projects, etc. subject to informal bidding –appeals without a hearing $100
Purchases of goods, services, public works projects, etc. subject to informal bidding - appeals with a hearing $500
Public Works Projects subject to formal bidding up to $1 million and formal requests for proposals – appeals without a hearing $250 Public Works Projects subject to formal bidding up to $1 million and formal requests for proposals – appeals with a hearing $750 Public Works Projects over $1 million and less than $5 million – appeals without a hearing $500
Public Works Projects over $1 million and less than $5 million – appeals with a hearing $1,000
Public Works Projects $5 million and over – appeals without a hearing $1,000 Public Works Projects $5 million and over – appeals with a hearing $1,500

BID PROTEST & BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY APPEALS FEES
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 13, Packet Page 42 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 46, Packet Page 49 P/C-Bldg Only
Low Range High Range Incrmt Result Extra
$0.00 $4,000 1000 $91.51 $0.00
$4,000.01 $5,000 1000 $95.56 $0.00
$5,000.01 $25,000 1000 $95.56 $20.16
$25,000.01 $50,000 1000 $498.86 $14.56
$50,000.01 $100,000 1000 $862.91 $10.09
$100,000.01 $500,000 1000 $1,367.71 $8.07
$500,000.01 $1,000,000 1000 $4,592.03 $6.86
$1,000,000.01 $99,999,999,999,999 1000 $8,021.16 $4.54
P/C- All Work
Low Range High Range Result Extra
$0.00 $2,000 1000 $91.51 $0.00
$2,000.01 $3,000 1000 $100.12 $0.00
$3,000.01 $25,000 1000 $100.12 $28.23
$25,000.01 $50,000 1000 $721.08 $20.37
$50,000.01 $100,000 1000 $1,230.50 $14.10
$100,000.01 $500,000 1000 $1,936.15 $11.30
$500,000.01 $1,000,000 1000 $6,455.49 $9.58
$1,000,000.01 $99,999,999,999,999 1000 $11,245.70 $6.36 Bldg Only
Low Range High Range Result Extra
$0.00 $2,000.00 1000 $91.51 $0.00
$2,000.01 $25,000.00 1000 $91.51 $31.03
$25,000.01 $50,000.00 1000 $805.15 $22.40
$50,000.01 $100,000.00 1000 $1,364.77 $15.52
$100,000.01 $500,000.00 1000 $2,140.46 $12.41
$500,000.01 $1,000,000.00 1000 $7,103.79 $10.54
$1,000,000.01 $9,999,999,999.99 1000 $12,369.75 $6.98
Bldg All Work
Low Range High Range Result Extra
$0.00 $1,000.00 1000 $91.51 $0.00
$1,000.01 $2,000.00 1000 $128.13 $0.00
$2,000.01 $25,000.00 1000 $128.13 $43.44
$25,000.01 $50,000.00 1000 $1,127.13 $31.33
$50,000.01 $100,000.00 1000 $1,909.98 $21.71
$100,000.01 $500,000.00 1000 $2,995.99 $17.39
$500,000.01 $1,000,000.00 1000 $9,946.77 $14.74
$1,000,000.01 $9,999,999,999.99 1000 $17,320.42 $9.77
1 Fee amounts include CPI adjustments.

Building Permit Fees - Monterey

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT - PERMITS & INSPECTIONS
Fee Amount
Fee Amount
Fee Amount

DESCRIPTION
Plan Check - Monterey
Fee Amount
FY22 FEE1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 14, Packet Page 43 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 47, Packet Page 50 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Architectural Review - ARC Major 1$4,190.50
Architectural Review - ARC Minor 1$1,907.00
Architectural Review - Admin Major 1 $1,177.50
Architectural Review - Admin Minor 1$328.50
Architectural Review - Signs ARC/HPC Review, including Historic Permit 1$1,458.00 Architectural Review - Signs Minor 1$374.50
Historical Preservation - Mills Act Request w/rezone * $0.00 Historical Preservation - Mills Act Request w/o rezone * $0.00 Historical Preservation - Demolition Review 1 $236.00
Historical Preservation - Historical Permit, major * $0.00 Historical Preservation - Historical Permit, admin * $0.00 Historical Preservation - Historic Report, review * $0.00 Hisotric Preservation - Historic Survey * $0.00
Conditional Use Permits -Planning Commission Major (deposit) $4,000 deposit Preapplication $1,000.00
Conditional Use Permits - Planning Commision Minor 1 $2,170.00 Conditional Use Permits - Zoning Administrator 1$918.00 Conditional Use Permits - Temporary 1$328.50
Variances/Parking Adjustment - Major Planning Commission 1$1,718.00 Variances/Parking Adjustment - Minor Zoning Administrator 1$918.00 Subdivisions - Tentative Subdivision Map (includes preliminary and final) $6,000 deposit Subdivisions - Covenant of Easement 1$338.00
Subdivisions - Minor Subdivisions 1$4,382.50
Subdivisions - Lot Line Adjustment 1$3,863.00
Subdivisions - Certificate of Compliance 1$1,391.50
Lot Merger 1$824.50
Environmental Review - Environmental Impact Report deposit based on cost estimate Environmental Review - Environmental Initial Study
leading to a Negative Declaration $4,000 deposit
Text or Map Admendments -
General Plan/Area Plan/Specific Plan/Zoning Ordinance $4,000 deposit Text or Map Admendments - Local Coastal Plan $5,000 deposit Annexation $5,000 deposit
Permits - Food Vending Permit 1$199.50
Permits - Development Services Sidewalk Vendor Permit 1$205.50 Permits - Home Occupation Permit 1$70.00
Zoning Affidavit 1$328.50
Permits - Permit Extension 1$920.00
Permits - Permit Amendment 2/3 of permit fee
Permits - Special Permits (bingo, pet) 1$199.50
Permits - Temporary Sign 1$17.50
Permits - Tree Permit Associated with Development (ARC) 1$672.50 Permits - Tree Permit Associated with Development (Administrative) 1$284.50 Concept Review (PC) 1$1,578.50
Undocumented Dwellings 1$328.50
Appeals - Of Decisions of Staff, ZA, ARC and
Environmental Determination to the Planning Commission 1$331.50 Appeals - Of Decisions of Planning Commission to the City Council 1$721.00

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT - PLANNING FEES
1 Per City Code Sec. 19-103, Fee includes CPI adjustments, for applicable fees (SF, April). * Solar arrays, cisterns, and safe parking are exempt from architectural review, historical preservation, use permit and variance fees.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 15, Packet Page 44 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 48, Packet Page 51 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Encroachment Permits
Street Opening Fee 1
$252.00
Street Opening Fee with Sewer Connection 1
$509.00
Temporary Encroachment Fee
(plus $91/hour if review outside PPW is required) 1
$193.00
Permanent Encroachment Fee
(plus $87/hour for inspection)1
$252.00
Driveway or Sidewalk Encroachment Fee1
$252.00
Traffic Control Fee1
$128.00
Public Improvement Inspection 3% of common area or dedication improvements Building Permits
Investigative Fee for work without permit(s) Cost of permit Missed inspections or work not complete1
$104.00
Sewer Lateral Review Fee1,2 $114.00
Plumbing Permit - for the issuance of
most Plumbing Permits1
$133.00
Electrical Permit1
$133.00
Mechanical Permit1
$133.00
Grading Plan Review Fee1
$133.00
Grading Permit Fee1
$133.00
Residential Property Inspections Reports -
Single Family Dwelling1
$148.00
Additional Inspection1
$104.00
Additional Plan Check fee1
$110.00
Address Change1
$76.00
Duplicate Job Card1
$53.00
Revision1
$53.00
Temporary Permit1
$143.00
General Plan Fee 15% of building permit fee
PW Engineering
Grease Interceptor Waiver Fee
(360 days from City letter) $60/month
Final Subdivision Map Check1
$754.00
Sewer Connection (Twin Oaks) $420/Developable parcel
Standard Specification $50/set
Street Patch Charge (asphalt only) $16.50/sq foot
Other
Banner
1 $190.00
Lease Administration Fee1
$250.00
Storm Water Review and Inspection Fee
(plus $94/hour)1
$330.00
Storm Water - Developer Design Review1
$2,230.00
Miscellaneous - Public Improvement Design Service
or Plan Check $111/hour
Miscellaneous - Administrative Notification Fee $111/hour

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT & PUBLIC WORKS DEPT - GENERAL 1 Fee amount includes CPI adjustments, for applicable fees (SF, April). 2 Per Ordinance #3579
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 16, Packet Page 45 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 49, Packet Page 52 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Overdue Fines - Adult Materials
(includes Audio Cassettes, CDs, Books, Magazines, DVDs, Videos) $.50/day to a max of $10 Overdue Fines - Teen Materials
(includes Audio Cassettes, CDs, Books, Magazines, DVDs, Videos) $.25/day to a max of $5 Overdue Fines - Youth Materials
(includes Audio Cassettes, CDs, Books, Magazines, DVDs, Videos) $.25/day to a max of $5 Overdue Fines - Laptop Computers $5/hour
Overdue Fines - Laptop Computers, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: $5/hour to a max of $50 Overdue Fines - Telescopes $5/day to a max of $50
Lost/Damaged Materials - Books Cost of item
Lost/Damaged Materials - Magazines Adult $10 / Youth & Teen $5 Lost/Damaged Materials - Paperbacks Youth $6
Lost/Damaged Materials - Paperbacks, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: REMOVE Library Cards - California Resident No Charge
Library Cards - Out of State Resident $5 for one month
Library Cards - Out of State Resident, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: $10/month Duplicate (Replacement) Library Card No Charge
Photocopying Services - Library
$.10 per single-sided black & white copy,
$.25 per single-sided color copy
Microfilm copies - Library $.25 per 8.5"x11" printed page Print-outs from Internet Stations $.10 per printed page Fees for document delivery, color internet prints, & duplication of California History Room photos and other archival materials. Call Library for fee Meeting Room Use - Community Room
(must be non-profit org w/ approved application on file) $10/hr max $50/day if user does not have
valid library card
Meeting Room Use - Conference Room
(must be non-profit org w/ approved application on file) $5/hr max $25/day if user does not have a
library card

LIBRARY
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 17, Packet Page 46 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 50, Packet Page 53

DESCRIPTION
FY22

PUBLISHED
FY22

NON-PROFIT
Room
Serra I $4,580 $3,665
Serra II $3,775 $3,020
Serra I, II $8,345 $6,675
Serra Lobby $1,135 $910
Steinbeck I $1,495 $1,195
Steinbeck II $1,205 $965
Steinbeck III $1,495 $1,195
Steinbeck I, II, III $4,120 $3,295
Steinbeck I - A $890 $715
Steinbeck I - B $890 $715
Steinbeck I - C $890 $715
Steinbeck Lobby $890 $715
Colton I, II or III $520 $415
Colton I, II & III $1,560 $1,245
Jeffers Plaza $1,495 $1,195
Stevenson I $635 $510
Stevenson II $635 $510
Stevenson Terrace $1,245 $995
Delmonte Terrace $1,135 $910
Parking $50 $50

3. Future rates beyond FY22 increase between 3-5% annually not to exceed 5%.

4. Rates are rounded off to the nearest $5.

5. Rates are on a fiscal basis July 1 through June 30.

Parking

MONTEREY CONFERENCE CENTER
Notes regarding MCC fees:

1. Published Rates: from $0.38/sq foot for Ballrooms to $1.09/square foot for Stevenson Rooms.

2. Non-Profit Rates: 20% off published rates for Monterey County 501 (c)(3) Organizations.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 18, Packet Page 47 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 51, Packet Page 54 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Equipment:
5x7 Lined pad w/pen or pencil 26.00/dozen
Hard candies 6.00/bowl
Table 18.00
Table w/linen 23.00
Linen - refresh 6.00
Skirt - refresh 38.00 (cost to dry clean)
Podium 30.00
Easel 15.00
Dance Floor/15x15 or larger 350.00 per event
Dance Floor/15x15 or smaller 150.00 per event
Pipe & Drape (2 bases) 20.00
Stanchion (2 bases) 10.00 per section
Chair, banquet 1.00
Services
Labor Fees:

Including but not limited to: removing decorations,
preparing for fog machines, additional room refreshes,
airwall open/close, room turns or balloon drops. 50.00/hr per person Room Turns:

Steinbeck Ia, Ib, Ic 50.00/section
Steinbeck II, III 150.00 per section
Colton 50.00 per section
Serra I 450.00 minimum
Serra II (Based On Setup Requirements) 400.00 minimum
Serra Carpet Replacement 125.00 per 3x3 section
Re-Key Lock + (1) Key 75.00
Additional Keys 25.00 each
Unreturned Keys 25.00 each
Banner hung, oversized with grommets @ corners & center 50.00 Banner installation of grommets @ 2 corners & center 50.00 Shipment per cardboard box

25.00/day to store
(5 boxes for the RENTER is complimentary with receipt
no earlier than 2 days prior to move in)
Shipment, oversized 110.00/day to store
Shipment, pallet
110.00 + 50.00/additional day to store, includes forklift assistance
Monterey Conference Center - Equipment & Service Fees
(2 pages)
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 19, Packet Page 48 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 52, Packet Page 55 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Monterey Conference Center - Equipment & Service Fees
(2 pages)
Analog Lines:

Polycom instrument 50.00/day
Heavy Equipment: Day = 8 hours
Forklift with operator 75.00/hr or 500.00/day
Scissor Lift 75.00/hr or 500.00/day
Powered Pallet Jack 30.00/hr or 150.00/day
Non-Powered Pallet Jack 25.00/hr or 125.00/day
Office Supplies/Services:

Power Strip 30.00
Extension Cords 20.00
Office Services/Supplies Cost + 25% (5.00 minimum)
Tables 9.00 each
Banquet Chairs 1.00 each
Risers 15.00 per 6' x 8' section
Forklift 50.00 per hr or 25.00 per ½ hr
Pallet Jack 50.00 per hr or 25.00 per ½ hr
Scissor Lift 50.00 per hr or 25.00 per ½ hr
Offsite Equipment Rental Fees:

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 20, Packet Page 49 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 53, Packet Page 56 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Pacific Biological Laboratories (public use)
$18/hour/staff person M-F 8am to 5pm, $25/hour/staff
person at other times,
including time for travel, set up & close-up
Pacific Biological Laboratories (public use),
FY23 FEE AMENDMENT:
$35/hour/staff person M-F 8am to 5pm, $60/hour/staff
person at other times,
including time for travel, set up & close-up

MUSEUMS & CULTURAL ARTS
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 21, Packet Page 50 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 54, Packet Page 57

DESCRIPTION
FEE
JANUARY 1, 2021
FEE
JANUARY 1, 2022
Cannery Row Garage $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr West Custom House Garage $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $562/yr East Custom House Garage $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr Waterfront Lot $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr Wharf II $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr Red Wharf Permits - $135/qtr Permits - $150/qtr
Depot Lot Figueroa / Del Monte $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr Upper 7 $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr Lot #4 Franklin / Van Buren $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr Lot #6 Wharf $157.50/mo, $465/qtr, $1674/yr $162.50/mo, $480/qtr, $1728/yr Lot #8 Franklin / Pierce $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr Lot #11 Franklin / Pierce $77.50/mo, $225/qtr, $810/yr $82.50/mo, $240/qtr, $864/yr Lot #14 Bonifacio / Adams $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr Lot #18 Van Buren / Jefferson $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr Lot #21 Foam / Cannery Row $47.50/mo, $135/qtr, $486/yr $52.50/mo, $150/qtr, $540/yr Lot B Calle Principal / Pearl $77.50/mo, $225/qtr, $810/yr $82.50/mo, $240/qtr, $864/yr New Monterey Employee Permit Permits - $27.50/mo, $75/qtr Permits - $32.50/mo, $90/qtr Monterey Resident Discount Decal
$20/yr
2hrs free in Downtown Garages (West and East),
Waterfront Lot and Cannery Row Garage
$20/yr
2hrs free in Downtown Garages (West and East),
Waterfront Lot and Cannery Row Garage
Employee Voucher Parking Program
Cannery Row & Downtown Garages
20 entries - $50
Valid in Downtown Garages (East and West)
and Cannery Row Garage
20 entries - $50
Valid in Downtown Garages (East and West)
and Cannery Row Garage
Construction Daily Permit
$10.00 Downtown
$20.00 Waterfront / Cannery Row
$15.00 Downtown
$25.00 Waterfront / Cannery Row
Reserved Parking (Citywide)
$20/space per day
$50/space for display
$25/space per day
$55/space for display

PARKING - PERMIT FEES

13. The City Manager or their designee shall have the authority to negotiate and set fees for any City parking facility for special events or functions.

Notes Regarding Parking Fees:

1. A refundable $5.00 deposit for the permit entry card and card programming will be required in addition to the permit fee.

Please note, if payment is received after the grace period, a reactivation fee of $5.00 per permit will be charged.

2. Wharf II permits shall only be issued to those who have boats at A or H Tier and must be verified with the Harbormaster.

3. Permit fees are non-refundable. If you desire to change your billing option, it will become effective the following quarter.

You may not switch billing options during the quarter.

4. A replacement fee of $10 per permit will be charged for lost or stolen paper permits.

5. An administrative fee of $10 will be charged to dismiss a parking citation for failure to display a proper permit.

6. Grace periods: Monthly Permits - 2 days, Quarterly Permits - 5 days, Annual Permits - 10 days

7. Permit Pro-rate Information: Monthly - on the 15th of each month, Quarterly - on the 1st and 15th of each month, Annual - None.

8. Monterey Residents may purchase a decal for $20/year that will allow them two hour parking in the Downtown Garages, Cannery Row Garage and the Waterfront Lot.

9. Effective 01/01/09, the Fisherman's Wharf Party Boat discount rate for the Waterfront lot for the period of Memorial Day through Labor Day shall be $7/day and $5/day the remaining time of the year.

10. Effective 01/01/09, the monthly charge for a net storage in the Depot Lot shall be $50/space.

11. Boot Removal Fee is $75.00.

12. The City Manager or their designee shall have the authority to set a flat parking rate in any attendant parking facility up to the approved maximum daily rate for said facility.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 22, Packet Page 51 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 55, Packet Page 58 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEES
Downtown:

Lot 7, Calle Principal Garage Lower $1.50/hr, $8.00 all day Lot 7, Calle Principal Garage Upper $1.50/hr, $8.00 all day Downtown West Garage
1st hr free, $1.00/30 min or fraction thereof.
$12 daily max
Downtown East Garage
1st hr free, $1.00/30 min or fraction thereof.
$12 daily max
Monterey Sports Center Lot
$1.50/hr, 3 hr max
Defered - Pending validation program
Lot 4, Franklin & Van Buren $1.50/hr $8.00 all day
Lot 8, Franklin & Pierce $1.50/hr
Lot B, Calle P. & Pearl permit only
Lot 11, Calle P. and Pearl $1.50/hr, $8.00 all day
Lot 14, Bonifacio & Adams $1.50/hr, $8.00 all day
Lot 18, Van Buren & Jefferson permit only
Cannery Row:

Meters, Cannery Row (Zone 1) $2.25/hr.

Meters, Wave (Zone 2) $2.00/hr.

Meters, Foam (Zone 3) $1.75/hr
CR1, Foam & Hoffman
Flat rate pricing or hourly rate structure based on
demand and season. $5.00 - $20 daily max
CR7, Foam & Irving $20/daily max, $5 after 5pm
Lot 24, C.R. & Foam - Meters (Zone 3) $1.75/hr
Lot 21, C.R. & Foam
$1.50/hr, $10 daily max
Double space $2/hr, $16 daily max
San Carlos Beach Lot $1.50/hr, $10 daily max
Coast Guard Pier (Breakwater)
$1.50/hr, $10 daily max
Double space $2/hr, $16 daily max
Waterfront:

Waterfront Lot 1 $1/30 minutes or fraction thereof, $15 daily max.

Marina Lot
$1.50/hr, $10 daily max
Double space $2/hr, $16 daily max
Depot Lot , Figueroa
$1.50/hr, $10 daily max
Double space $2/hr, $16 daily max
Municipal Wharf II $1.50/hr, $10 daily max
Lot 6, Waterfront no fee, loading/unloading zone only
Southern Pacific (SP) Lot $1.50/hr, $10 daily max
East Depot Lot/Gravel side
$1.50/hr, $10 daily max
Double space $2/hr, $16 daily max
Monterey Bay Park (MB7)
$1.50/hr, $10 daily max
Double space $2/hr, $16 daily max
NEW FY23 CATEGORY: Electric Vehicle Charging Rates:

NEW FY23 FEE: Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging, PER KWH $0.36 NEW FY23 FEE: Idle Fee After Designated Grace Period, PER MINUTE $0.50

PARKING - RATES
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 23, Packet Page 52 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 56, Packet Page 59

DESCRIPTION

PROGRAM
FEE

MONTEREY
RESIDENT FEE2
Permits/Facility Rentals

1. Group Picnic Permit $80 $61.20

2. El Estero Park Group Picnic Permit $104 $85.28

3. Veteran's Memorial Park Group Area 2 Picnic Permit $104 $85.28

4. Group Beach Permit $80 $61.20

5. Group Beach Permit/Commercial $215 $215.00

6. Beach Wedding Permit $607 $607.00

7. Beach/Park Annual Use Permit For Small Group Activities Incl. Picnics/Teambuilding/Instructional Classes/Camps/Fitness Or Athletic Training (groups of 15 or less)- Commercial $789 $603.59

8. Beach/Park Annual Use Permit For Small Group Activities Incl. Picnics/Teambuilding/Instructional Classes/Camps/Fitness Or Athletic Training (groups of 15 or less)- Nonprofit $248 $248.00

9. Sport Court Permit
(eg., Volleyball, Basketball, Tennis) - PER DAY $66 $50.49

10. Bounce House/Inflatable Permit $50 $50.00

11. Wedding Event Permit - Colton Hall Lawn
Or Friendly Plaza - Per Location $218 $185.30

12. Event Permit (Per Day) $607 $607.00

13. Event/Park Closure Permit (Per Day) $1,379 $1,379.00

14. Meeting Room Use - Nonprofit (During Community Center Operating Hours) - Per Hour Fee $27 $27.00

15. Meeting Room Use - Nonprofit (During Community Center Non-Operating Hours) - Per Hour Fee w/ 2 Hour Minimum $56 $56.00

16. Facility Rental – Community Centers Private Party Use - Per Hour Fee w/ 2 Hour Minimum $146 $111.69

17. Waterfront Community Room Rental Permit - Nonprofit - Per Hour Fee $80 $80.00

18. Ballpark Event Permit
Day Use $607 $607.00
Hourly Use $61 $61.00
Lights Use - Per Hour Fee $27 $27.00

19. Ballpark Use Fee Practice -
Per Hour Fee w/ 2 Hour Minimum $28 $22.40

20. Parks & Recreation Commission
Appeal Process $179 $179.00

PARKS & RECREATION
(4 pages)
effective April 1, 2022
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 24, Packet Page 53 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 57, Packet Page 60

DESCRIPTION

PROGRAM
FEE

MONTEREY
RESIDENT FEE2

PARKS & RECREATION
(4 pages)
effective April 1, 2022

21. Monterey Sports Center
Drop-In Admission:

Youth (3-17 Years) $9 $8.00
Adult (18-61 Years) $14 $13.00
Senior (62 And Older) $9 $8.00
10-Visit Pass:

Youth (3-17 Years) $90 $80.00
Adult (18-61 Years) $140 $130.00
Senior (62 And Older) $90 $80.00
Subscription/Auto Billing (1 Month):

Youth (9-12 Years) $34 $30.60
Teen (13-17 Years) $37 $33.30
Adult (18-61 Years) $61 $54.90
Senior (62 And Older) $45 $40.50
Family* $87 $78.30
Membership (1 Year):

Youth (9-12 Years) $371 $333.90
Teen (13-17 Years) $408 $367.20
Adult (18-61 Years) $668 $601.20
Senior (62 And Older) $493 $443.70
Family* $957 $861.30
Business/Corporate Fee:

Membership (1 Year) $586 $586.00
Facility Rental (Staff Time Additional)
During Non-Operating Hours:

Pool - First 2 Hours $304 $273.60
Additional Hour $136 $122.40
Gym - First 2 Hours $304 $273.60
Additional Hour $136 $122.40
Pool & Gym - First 2 Hours $466 $419.40
Additional Hour $223 $200.70
During Operating Hours:

Pool Lane Rental - Per Hour Fee $19 $17.10
Gymnasium Court Rental- Per Hour Fee $37 $33.30
Studio Rental- Per Hour Fee $74 $66.60
* Family Membership Eligibility - 2 adults and their dependent children 20 years of age and younger than live in the same household.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 25, Packet Page 54 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 58, Packet Page 61

DESCRIPTION

PROGRAM
FEE

MONTEREY
RESIDENT FEE2

PARKS & RECREATION
(4 pages)
effective April 1, 2022
Conference Room Rental- Per Hour Fee $25 $22.50

22. Veteran's Memorial Park Campground:

Campsite With 1 Vehicle $44 $44.00
Additional Vehicle $12 $12.00
Each Bicycle - Hiker Campsite $9 $9.00
Overnight Youth Group Area 3 - Per Person Fee $9 $9.00
Overnight Youth Group Area 2 - Per Person Fee $11 $11.00 Active Duty & Retired U.S. Military,
Disabled U.S. Veterans & Senior Age 62
And Older - (Vehicle Campsite)3
$5 DISCOUNT $5 DISCOUNT
Active Duty & Retired U.S. Military,
Disabled U.S. Veteran & Senior Age 62
And Older - (Hiker Campsite)3
$2 DISCOUNT $2 DISCOUNT
Shower Fee For Non-Campers $4 $4.00
Dump Station Fee For Non-Campers - Per Use Fee $12 $12.00 Recreational Vehicle Surcharge - Per Night Fee $6 $6.00 Urban Forestry
$112.00
$0.00
$139.50
$198.50
4 The Parks and Recreation Director may approve promotional pricing for Recreation activities, programs, and services, subject to the following standards: 1. The fee reduction must be intended to promote Recreation programs and facilities; 2. The fee reduction shall not reduce fees by more than 25%; 3. The fee reduction is publicized and open to all; and 4. The fee reduction is limited in duration. 5 The Parks and Recreation Director is authorized to set fees for Recreation activities, programs and services, subject to the following standards: 1. Recreational programs and services shall benefit both the participant and the community due to their educational, cultural, and physical value. 2. Recreational programs and services require facilities, supplies, equipment, and/or considerable staff planning and supervision specific to the program and therefore, it is appropriate to charge a fee for these programs and services. Some examples include, but are not limited to instructional programs, summer day camp, senior programs, teen programs, special events, and youth/adult athletic programs. 3. Fees will not exceed the reasonable cost to the City of providing the program, class, or service. 4. Fees will remain affordable to allow access to community members, especially youth and seniors; and 5. Contractually taught class fees will be set based on availability of instructor, instructor costs, as these programs follow city purchasing policy.
1 Fees will be annually adjusted per CPI (SF, April Edition) rounded to the nearest fifty cents. 2 To be eligible for the resident rate, the purchaser must be a resident of the City of Monterey or United States Active Duty Military as of the date of registration or for eligible employee and dependents who have access to resident rates per Memoranda of Understanding. Proof of residency, such as a driver's license or state-issued identification, utility bill or U. S. Military active duty status such as military ID is required. 3 To be eligible for discounted camping rates at Veteran's Memorial Park, proof of age such as a driver's license or state-issued identification, or proof of United States Military active duty, retired or disabled veteran status is required.

Notes Regarding Parks & Recreation fees:

Tree View Trimming Permit - City or Private Tree1
Tree Removal Permit Fee - Dead and Dying1
Tree Removal Permit Fee (Non-Development)1
Tree Removal Permit Appeal Fee (Non-Development)1
Non-Development Tree Permits:

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 26, Packet Page 55 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 59, Packet Page 62

DESCRIPTION

PROGRAM
FEE

MONTEREY
RESIDENT FEE2

PARKS & RECREATION
(4 pages)
effective April 1, 2022
6 Five percent (5%) of Parks & Recreation (P&R) Fees, which excludes P&R Commission Appeals, Cemetery, RV Storage Lot, and Urban Forestry fees, will be committed to the Facility Maintenance and Improvement Fund.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 27, Packet Page 56 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 60, Packet Page 63 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
1 RESIDENT*
Ground Burials for Caskets
a. Infant Burial Site $1,541.00 $1,309.50
b. Adult Burial Site - Single Depth $5,058.50 $4,300.00 c. Adult Burial Site - Double Depth $8,218.00 $6,984.50 d. Changing Rights from Adult Single Depth to Adult Double Depth (50% of Adult Single Depth Price) $2,529.50 $2,150.00
Niche Inurnment
a. Niche- Single Lakeside Columbarium $2,761.00 $2,346.50 b. Niche - Double Lakeside and Old Columbarium $5,239.00 $4,452.50 Ground Burial for Urns
a. Full Burial Site (1-8 urns) $5,058.50 $4,300.00
b. Half Burial Site (1-4 urns) $2,529.25 $2,073.50
c. NEW FY23 FEE: Quarter Burial Site (1-2 urns only) $1,686.00 $1,075.25 c. (d.) Cremains Added Plot (2nd, 3rd right etc. of Inurnment) $1,333.50 $1,133.50 Cremains Added Plot (2nd, 3rd right etc. of Inurnment), FY23 FEE AMENDMENT:
$616.50 $616.50
NEW FY23 CATEGORY: Ossuary- Scattering Garden (shared burial site) a.

NEW FY23 FEE: Remains added to shared burial site- remains not retrievable $300.00 $255.00
b. NEW FY23 FEE: Fetal remains $50.00 $42.50
Indenture/Administrative Fee
a. Indenture – Burial Site $213.00
b. Indenture - Niche $213.00
c. Indenture Transfer fee $250.50
d. Deed Replacement $82.00
e. Ossuary Administrative Fee $30.00
Endowment Care
a. Infant Burial Site $655.00
b. Half Burial Site $1,200.50
c. NEW FY23 FEE: Quarter Burial Site (1-2 urns only) $620.00 c. (d.) Burial Site – Single Depth $1,855.50
d. (e.) Burial Site – Double Depth $1,855.50
e. (f.) Niche- Single $873.00
f. (g.) Niche- Double $1,091.50
h. Ossuary (Scattering Garden) $75.00
Internment/Inurnment – Labor Charges
a. Infant Cremains $573.00
b. Adult Cremains $616.50
c. Infant Casket Burial $753.00
d. Child Casket Burial $764.00
e. Child Burial (adult sized casket) $1,200.50
f. Adult Burial – Single Depth $1,200.50
g. Adult Burial – Double Depth $1,386.00
h. Niche- Lakeside Columbarium Inurnment $409.50
i. Niche- Old Columbarium Inurnment $502.50

PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT - CEMETERY FEES
(2 pages)
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 28, Packet Page 57 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 61, Packet Page 64 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
1 RESIDENT*

PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT - CEMETERY FEES
(2 pages)
a. Infant Burial $436.50
b. Cremation Burial $436.50
c. Niche – Columbarium Inurnment $436.50
d. Adult Burial – Single Depth $829.50
e. Adult Burial - Double Depth (1st, 2nd Right of Internment) $829.50 Disinterment – Labor Charges
a. Infant Cremains $459.00
b. Adult Cremains $627.50
c. Infant/Child Casket Burial $1,959.00
d. Child Casket Burial (adult sized casket) $2,723.00
e. Adult Burial – Single Depth $2,892.50
f. Adult Burial – Double Depth $3,651.00
g. Dis-inurnment Niche - Single/face plate disposal/replace $709.50 h. Dis-inurnment Niche - Double/ face plate disposal/replace $818.50 Memorial Marker Placement - Cement Border
a. 8X16x3 inch $141.50
b. 12X24x3 inch $377.00
c. 12x36x3 inch $480.00
12x36x3 inch, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: REMOVE
d. (c.) 16x28x3 inch $523.50
Memorial Marker Placement – No Cement Border
a. 8X16x3 inch $131.50
b. 12X24x3 inch $245.50
c. 12x36x3 inch $268.00
12x36x3 inch, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: REMOVE
d. (c.) 16X28x3 inch $322.50
Other Services
a. Niche Engraving - Single Niche – per character $9.00 b. Niche Engraving - Double Niche - per character $9.00 c. Flower Vase Drilling $16.00
d. Paint Inscriptions $191.00
e. Remove Marker/Dispose $245.50
1 Fees shall be adjusted annually in July based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The CPI increase shall be based on the published CPI for San Francisco Area (San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) April edition and rounded to the nearest fifty cents (0.50). *To be eligible for the resident rate, the purchaser or deceased must be a resident of the City of Monterey as of the date of purchase or death or for eligible employees who have access to residents rates per Memorandum of Understanding. Proof of residency, such as a driver’s license or utility bill we be required.

Internment/Inurnment - Weekends/Holidays – Labor Charges – Additional Fee Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 29, Packet Page 58 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 62, Packet Page 65 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Special Events Stand-by (Fire) Fully Burdened Cost
Engine Company Inspections (initial inspection) $0
Engine Company Inspections - First re-inspection $0
Engine Company Inspections - Subsequent re-inspections $90 Fire Prevention Bureau Inspections - initial inspection $0 Fire Prevention Bureau Inspections - First re-inspection $0 Fire Prevention Bureau Inspections - Second re-inspection $100 Fire Prevention Bureau Inspections - Third re-inspection $200 Fire Prevention Bureau Inspections - Fourth & each subsequent reinspection $500 State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Pre-Inspection Fee ≤25 occupants $143
State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Pre-Inspection Fee ≥26 occupants $244
State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Fire Clearance Fee 7 to 50 occupants $143
State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Fire Clearance Fee >50 occupants $244
State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Annual Inspection Fee 7 to 50 occupants $143
State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Annual Inspection Fee >50 occupants $244
High Rise Inspection $1,010
Annual Day Care Inspections (6 or more children) $66
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
First False Alarm $0
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
Second False Alarm $20
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
Third False Alarm $30
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
Fourth False Alarm $60
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
Fifth False Alarm $100
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
Any Additional False Alarms $500
Hazardous Materials Response Fully Burdened Cost
DUI Incident Reimbursement1Not to exceed $12,000
Fire Hydrant Flow Tests $75
CPR Heart Saver Class - cost per student $50
CPR Healthcare Provider Class - cost per student $60

PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE
(2 pages)
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 30, Packet Page 59 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 63, Packet Page 66 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE

PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE
(2 pages)
CPR First Aid - cost per student $100
Fire Plan review and inspections, trade show set-up review $66 Fire Plan review and inspections, Liquid Propane Gas installations $235 Fire Plan review and inspections, Field Inspections (missed appointment) Fully Burdened Cost
Fire Plan review and inspections, Medical Gas $235
Fire Plan review and inspections, Tent Installation
(400 - 1000 sq ft) $143
Fire Plan review and inspections, Tent Installation
(1000 - 2000 sq ft) $194
Fire Plan review and inspections, Tent Installation
(>2000 sq ft) $244
Unauthorized Work Double Permit Fee
Unauthorized Occupancy $100
Fire Department Review of Building Plans, Residential 10% of Building Plan Check Fee Fire Department Review of Building Plans, Commercial 20% of Building Plan Check Fee Project Consultation Fee Fully Burdened Cost
Expedited Plan Checks Fully Burdened Cost
Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Fire Alarm System $607 Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Automatic Fire Sprinkler System 1-5 Heads $428
Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Automatic Fire Sprinkler System 6-180 Heads (in-house review) $816
Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Automatic Fire Sprinkler System 6-180 Heads (contractor review) $428 + contractor cost Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Automatic Fire Sprinkler System 180+ Heads (in-house review), ie. tenant improvements $816
Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Automatic Fire Sprinkler System 180+ Heads (contractor review) $662 + contractor cost Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees - Fixed Fire Protection System, other than Sprinklers (ie., spray booth, clean agent, hood system), new system $816
Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees - Fixed Fire Protection System, other than sprinklers (ie., spray booth, cleant agent, hood system) - alteration to existing system $525
Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees - Underground Systems (includes plan review, inspection, permit approval, system test flush) system test flush) $1,010

1. Including but not limited to personnel, apparatus, vehicles, reports, booking.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 31, Packet Page 60 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 64, Packet Page 67 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Vehicle Equipment Inspection $16
Animal Impound Fee - altered animal 1st visit $54
Animal Impound Fee - non-altered animal 1st visit $64
Animal Impound Fee - altered animal 2nd vist and thereafter $69 Animal Impound Fee - non-altered animal 2nd visit and thereafter $79 Animal Impound Fee - daily kennel fee $22
Fingerprints - inked card $12
LiveScan service only $33
LiveScan prints - Local (includes DOJ fee)2$65
LiveScan prints - Local/Federal (includes DOJ & FBI fee)2$82 LiveScan prints - Child Care Provision (includes DOJ & CACI fee)2$80 Clearance Letter $20
Taxicab Owner or Driver Permit Application Review $0
Taxicab Driver Permit $194
Taxicab Vehicle Permit $56
Taxicab Driver Transfer $58
Massage Establishment - CAMTC Certified Owner(s) $128
Massage Establishment - Non-CAMTC Certified Owner(s) $222 Amended Massage Establishment Permit $13
Amended Massage Establishment Permit with Livescan $94
Local Background Checks $10
Security Alarm Permit $25
Police False Alarm Response - First false alarm $0
Police False Alarm Response - Second false alarm $30
Police False Alarm Response - Third false alarm $50
Police False Alarm Response - Fourth false alarm $75
Police False Alarm Response - Fifth false alarm $100
Police False Alarm Response - Sixth false alarm and thereafter $500 Police Party Disturbance Response - First response $0
Police Party Disturbance Response - Second response $80 Commercial Filming (daily)5$350 to $1,500
Vehicle Release $172
Concealed Weapons Permit $100
Alcoholic Beverages on the Beach Permit (for 10 or fewer people) $10 Officer Public Service Rate (hourly)4$121.41
CSO Public Service Rate (hourly)4$86.21
DUI Incident Reimbursement3Not to exceed $12,000
Dog License - 1-12 months - unaltered dog $24
Dog License - 1-12 months - altered dog $9
Dog License - each additional month - unaltered dog $2
Dog License - each additional month - altered dog $1
Dog License - delinquent penalty $15
Dog License - replacement tag $2
Pedicab Owner Permit1$204.00
Pedicab Driver Permit1$204.00

4. Based on FY18 costs.

5. Commercial Filming is based on # of days requested, amount of staff time involved in getting the permit in order, & client mtgs.

PUBLIC SAFETY - POLICE

1. Adjusts annually July 1 per CPI SF April edition, rounded to nearest $0.50.

2. Total fee comprised of service fee set by resolution ($33) and fees set by State DOJ and FBI.

3. Including but not limited to personnel, apparatus, vehicles, reports, booking.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 32, Packet Page 61 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 65, Packet Page 68 FY23 Mar-Oct Transient1 $0.83 Nov-Feb Transient1
$0.76
TIER BERTH SIZE LENGTH FY23 MONTHLY1
FY23 ANNUAL1 MONTHLY 1.5x 1 Monthly Transient1
$/ft length
Daily
Transient 1 Monthly Transient1
$/ft length
Daily
Transient1
A 4, 6-8, 10, 12 50X19.5 50 560.50 6,053.50 841.00 1,162.00 41.50 1,064.00 38.00 A 9, 11 45X19.5 45 517.00 5,583.50 775.50 1,050.00 37.50 952.00 34.00 A 13-18* 45X15.5 45 489.50 5,286.50 734.50 1,050.00 37.50 952.00 34.00 A 19-34 45X14.5 45 489.50 5,286.50 734.50 1,050.00 37.50 952.00 34.00 A 35-58 40X14.5 40 452.00 4,881.50 678.00 924.00 33.00 854.00 30.50 A 59-80* 35X13.5 35 416.50 4,498.00 625.00 812.00 29.00 742.00 26.50 A 81-82 35X14.5 35 416.50 4,498.00 625.00 812.00 29.00 742.00 26.50 B 1-36* 30X11.5 30 357.50 3,861.00 536.50 700.00 25.00 630.00 22.50 B 37-57 (odd) 35-12.5 35 390.50 4,217.50 586.00 812.00 29.00 742.00 26.50 B 38-58 (even) 30x12.5 30 371.50 4,012.00 557.50 700.00 25.00 630.00 22.50 B 59 35X13 35 416.50 4,498.00 625.00 812.00 29.00 742.00 26.50 B 60 30x13 30 371.50 4,012.00 557.50 700.00 25.00 630.00 22.50 C 1-4 25x11.9 25 303.50 3,278.00 455.50 588.00 21.00 532.00 19.00 C 5-40 25x10 25 295.50 3,191.50 443.50 588.00 21.00 532.00 19.00 D 1-36* 30X11.5 30 357.50 3,861.00 536.50 700.00 25.00 630.00 22.50 D 37-58 30X12.5 30 371.50 4,012.00 557.50 700.00 25.00 630.00 22.50 D 59-60 30X13 30 371.50 4,012.00 557.50 700.00 25.00 630.00 22.50 E 1-36 25x11.9 25 303.50 3,278.00 455.50 588.00 21.00 532.00 19.00 E 37-40 25X10.6 25 295.50 3,191.50 443.50 588.00 21.00 532.00 19.00 F 1-44 20X9.9 20 197.50 2,133.00 296.50 462.00 16.50 420.00 15.00 G 1* 26X11.5 26 323.50 3,494.00 485.50 602.00 21.50 546.00 19.50 G 2-18* 35X12.5 35 390.50 4,217.50 586.00 812.00 29.00 742.00 26.50 G 19-27 35X13 35 416.50 4,498.00 625.00 812.00 29.00 742.00 26.50 G 28 35X14.5 35 416.50 4,498.00 625.00 812.00 29.00 742.00 26.50 G 29 40 40 452.00 4,881.50 678.00 924.00 33.00 854.00 30.50 H 1-2 & 5 50X24 50 604.00 6,523.00 906.00 1,162.00 41.50 1,064.00 38.00 H 3-4 50X19.5 50 560.50 6,053.50 841.00 1,162.00 41.50 1,064.00 38.00 H 6-14* 50X17.5 50 541.50 5,848.00 812.50 1,162.00 41.50 1,064.00 38.00 H 15-24 50X15.5 50 517.00 5,583.50 775.50 1,162.00 41.50 1,064.00 38.00 H 25-34 25X10.6 25 295.50 3,191.50 443.50 588.00 21.00 532.00 19.00 I 1-10 20X9.9 20 197.50 2,133.00 296.50 462.00 16.50 420.00 15.00 I 11-14 Side-tie 20 175.50 1,895.50 263.50 462.00 16.50 420.00 15.00

7.73 Transformer berths (6 feet shorter and charged at a lesser rate) A 17 39X15.5 39 424.50 4,584.50 637.00 910.00 32.50 826.00 29.50 A 61 28X13 28 338.00 3,650.50 507.00 658.00 23.50 588.00 21.00 B 1 & 31 24X11.5 24 283.50 3,062.00 425.50 560.00 20.00 504.00 18.00 D 1 & 31 24X11.5 24 283.50 3,062.00 425.50 560.00 20.00 504.00 18.00 G 15 28X12.5 28 311.50 3,364.00 467.50 658.00 23.50 588.00 21.00 H 13 44X17.5 44 485.50 5,243.50 728.50 1,022.00 36.50 938.00 33.50 1 Licensee fee amounts include CPI adjustments per year end Feb SF.

Non-standard berth -
fishing vessel rate $/ft: 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 33, Packet Page 62 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 66, Packet Page 69 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE

MONTEREY OUTER HARBOR MOORING RATES
Monterey Resident Rate1
Quarterly $236.00
Annual (with 10% discount) $849.50
Liveaboard quarterly $85.00
Liveaboard annually (with 10% discount) $306.00
Non-Resident Rate1
Quarterly $298.00
Annual (with 10% discount) $1,073.00
OHM Assignment Fee per month1
$74.50
Other Services1
Qrt Wharf 1 Dinghy fee $80.50
Qrt Marina Dinghy fee $134.50
Qrt Marina Boat Rack (kayaks) $53.50
Qrt Marina Boat Rack (skiff) Dinghy fee $80.50
City Mooring Rate1
Monthly $137.00
Quarterly $411.00
Quarterly, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: REMOVE
Yearly (with 10% discount) $1,479.50
Yearly (with 10% discount), FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: REMOVE
East Mooring Rates
Vessel Size1
Under 30 ft1
$127.30
30' to 40' 1
$168.90
41' to 54' 1
$211.60
FY23 FEE DESCRIPTION AMENDMENT: 41' to 45' 1
$211.60
55' and larger 1
$252.90
55' and larger 1, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: REMOVE
East Mooring Rates from Nov through March = 1.5 times regular berth rate Transient Mooring - East Mooring Balls $15/day
Comprehensive Fee Schedule

PUBLIC WORKS - HARBOR & MARINA
(2 pages)
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 34, Packet Page 63 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 67, Packet Page 70 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Comprehensive Fee Schedule

PUBLIC WORKS - HARBOR & MARINA
(2 pages)
OTHER
Marina Impound Fee 1.5 x Transient berth rate
Crane $200/hour or portion thereof
Crane, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: REMOVE
Boat Towing $100/hour or portion thereof
Boat Towing, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Disabled Vessel Towing, PER HOUR or portion thereof 1
$215.00
Water Removal (charged only if owner is notified and fails to respond) $45/hour or portion thereof Water Removal, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Water Removal (charged only if owner is notified and fails to respond), PER HOUR or portion thereof 1 $61.50
Mooring Repair Rate $100/hour or portion thereof
Mooring Repair Rate, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Mooring Repair Rate, PER HOUR or portion thereof 1
$241.00
Deposits - Refundable
Electrical Pigtails
20/30 amp $100
50 amp $200
Marina Shower Key $20
Marina Shower Key, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Marina Shower, Restroom, Gate, Hoist Keys $20
Marina Gate Key/Hoist Key $10
Marina Gate Key/Hoist Key, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: REMOVE
Annual Parking Permit - Marina Berth License Holder $120/calendar year Annual Parking Permit - Marina Berth License Holder, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Annual Parking Permit - Marina Berth License Holder, PER CALENDAR YEAR 1 $120
Bike Locker Rental $10/month
Bike Locker Rental, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Bike Locker Rental, PER MONTH 1 $10
Public Hoist on Wharf II $1.50 for 15 minutes
Public Hoist on Wharf II, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Public Hoist on Wharf II, PER 15 MINUTES 1

5.50 Mooring Inspection Fee $100/hour
Mooring Inspection Fee, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Mooring Inspection Fee (Forced) 1 120.50
Yellow Boat Dock (Dive Boat Loading and Sailing Charters) $150/month Yellow Boat Dock, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Yellow Boat Dock, PER MONTH (Dive Boat Loading and Sailing Charters) 1
$150
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 35, Packet Page 64 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 68, Packet Page 71 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Comprehensive Fee Schedule

PUBLIC WORKS - HARBOR & MARINA
(2 pages)
Berth Assignment Rate 1.5x Regular berth rate
Waiting List - Initial Fee $20
Waiting List - Initial Fee, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: $25.50
Waiting List - Annual Fee $10
K Tier Side-tie Transient (no utilities, rafting required) 28' & Under (Summer) $9/day or $250/month
28' & Under (Summer), FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: 28' & Under (Summer), PER DAY $12.50 29' & Up (Summer) $12/day or $335/month
29' & Up (Summer), FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: 29' & Up (Summer), PER DAY $18.75 K Tier Side-tie Transient (no utilities, rafting required) 28' & Under (Winter)2
$8/day or $225/month
28' & Under (Winter), FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: 28' & Under (Winter), PER DAY 2 $11.25
29' & Up (Winter)2
$11/day or $310/month
29' & Up (Winter), FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: 29' & Up (Winter), PER DAY 2 $17.00
Wharf I & II Transient Vessel
Wharf I & II Transient Vessel, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Wharf I & II Transient Vessel 1 51' - 70' $30/day
51' - 70', FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: 51' - 70', PER DAY $30.00 71' - 90' $35/day
71' - 90', FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: 71' - 90', PER DAY 35.00 91' & over $40/day
91' & over, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: 91' & over, PER DAY 40.00 Cruise Ship Passenger Landing Fee $7/passenger
Cruise Ship Passenger Landing Fee, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Cruise Ship Passenger Landing Fee, PER PASSENGER 1
$7.50
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 36, Packet Page 65 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 69, Packet Page 72 DESCRIPTION FY22 FEE
Comprehensive Fee Schedule

PUBLIC WORKS - HARBOR & MARINA
(2 pages)
Wharfage1
Wharfage1 , FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: Wharfage
High Volume Seafood (Trawl-caught ground fish, squid, mackerels, sardines) $/TON $7.14 High Volume Seafood (Trawl-caught ground fish, squid, mackerels, sardines) $/TON, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: High Volume Seafood (Trawl-caught ground fish, squid, mackerels, sardines) $/TON 3
$7.14
High Volume Seafood (Anchovies) $/TON $3.58
High Volume Seafood (Anchovies) $/TON, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: High Volume Seafood (Anchovies) $/TON 3
$3.58
All Other Seafood/Sea Products Harvested by Pot, Trap, Hooks, or By Hand (includes crustaceans and invertebrates) $/POUND $0.024
All Other Seafood/Sea Products Harvested by Pot, Trap, Hooks, or By Hand (includes crustaceans and invertebrates) $/POUND, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT: All Other Seafood/Sea Products Harvested by Pot, Trap, Hooks, or By Hand (includes crustaceans and invertebrates) $/POUND 4 $0.024
Aguaculture Abalone (Less than 4" in length) $/EACH $0.060 Aguaculture Abalone (Less than 4" in length) $/EACH, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT:

Aguaculture Abalone (Less than 4" in length) $/EACH 4 $0.060 Aguaculture Abalone (4" or larger in length) $/EACH $0.119 Aguaculture Abalone (4" or larger in length) $/EACH, FY23 FEE AMENDMENT:

Aguaculture Abalone (4" or larger in length) $/EACH 4
$0.119
1 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF.
1 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF, FY23 FOOTNOTE AMENDEMENT: 1 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF, rounded down to the nearest dollar.
2 There is a single fee for K-Tier Side-tie Transient; a reduced fee is charged during Winter months. (NO CHANGE) (FY23 NEW FOOTNOTE) 3 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF, no rounding. (FY23 NEW FOOTNOTE) 4 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF, rounded to the nearest mill.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 37, Packet Page 66 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 70, Packet Page 73 DESCRIPTION UNITS FY22 FEE
Category
Residential Sewer Charge1$10.77
Multi-Residential/Condo Sewer Charge1$7.88
Sewer Connection Fee2Dwelling Unit $3,090
Non-residential Sewer Charges1
(per one unit of sewer charge)
Business/Government (1-10 employees) Location/Each Business $8.29 Business/Government (11-20 employees) Location/Each Business $16.59 Business/Government (21-30 employees) Location/Each Business $24.99 Business/Government (31-40 employees) Location/Each Business $33.28 Business/Government (41-50 employees) Location/Each Business $41.57 Business/Government (51-60 employees) Location/Each Business $49.87 Business/Government (61-70 employees) Location/Each Business $58.27 Business/Government (71-80 employees) Location/Each Business $66.56 Business/Government (81-90 employees) Location/Each Business $74.85 Business/Government (91-100 employees) Location/Each Business $83.14 Business/Government (101-110 employees) Location/Each Business $91.55 Business/Government (111-120 employees) Location/Each Business $99.84 Business/Government (141-150 employees) Location/Each Business $124.82 Business/Government (171-180 employees) Location/Each Business $149.70 Business/Government (181-190 employees) Location/Each Business $158.10 Business/Government (210-220 employees) Location/Each Business $182.98 Business/Government (271-280 employees) Location/Each Business $232.52 Business/Government (721-730 employees) Location/Each Business $607.32 Hotel/Motel Each Room $4.63
Supermarket Each Location $45.45
Medical Office Each Licensed Physician $11.09
Dental Office Each Licensed Dentist $15.29
Rest Home/Convalescent Each Bed of Licensed Capacity $3.12 Animal Hospital Location/Each Licensed Business $20.79
Restaurant - 1 Meal/day Each Restaurant Seat $0.43
Restaurant - 2 Meals/day Each Restaurant Seat $0.65
Restaurant - 3 Meals/day Each Restaurant Seat $1.18
Restaurant with Bar Each Restaurant Seat $1.18
Bar Location/Each Business $18.09
Night Club Location/Each Business $54.17
Take-Out Small Location/Each Business $20.14
Take-Out Medium Location/Each Business $49.65
Take-Out Large Location/Each Business $90.47
Bakery Location/Each Business $16.37
Theatre Per screen @ each Location $26.82

PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
(2 pages)
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 38, Packet Page 67 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 71, Packet Page 74 DESCRIPTION UNITS FY22 FEE

PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
(2 pages)
Non-residential Sewer Charges1
(per one unit of sewer charge) cont'd
Gym - 500 Members Location/Each Business $8.29
Mortuary Location/Each Business $22.08
School - Minimum Location/Each Business $8.29
School - Pre-Grade 6 School Population $0.11
School - Grade 7 - College School Population $0.22
School - Boarding School Population $2.26
Instructional Facility School Population $8.29
Church - 1-100 Members Location/Each Business $8.29
Church - Over 100 Members Location/Each Business $16.59 Photo Developer Location/Each Business $8.29
Laboratory - 10 Employees Location/Each Business $8.29
Laboratory - 20 Employees Location/Each Business $16.59 Printer - 10 Employees Location/Each Business $8.29
Printer - 20 Employees Location/Each Business $16.59
Garage/Repair Location/Each Business $7.97
Paint Shop - 10 Employees Location/Each Business $8.29
Paint Shop - 20 Employees Location/Each Business $16.59 Dry Cleaner Location/Each Business $27.57
Laundromat Each Washing Machine $7.22
1 Fees set with annual increases July 1 of each year through 2015/16. 2 Annual increases effective July 1 each year, per Construction Cost Index (MRWPCA ordinance for Dec).

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 39, Packet Page 68 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 72, Packet Page 75 ATTACHMENT 2
FY22 FEE DESCRIPTION PROPOSED
FY23 NAME CHANGE FY22 FEE

PROPOSED
FY23 FEE CHANGE,
(any CPI applies July 1, 2023)
CITY CLERK OFFICE
N/A ‐ New Fee
Deposit for Filing a Notice of Intent to Circulate Initiative Petition N/A ‐ New Fee $200
HARBOR
City Mooring Rate1
Quarterly REMOVE $411.00 REMOVE
Yearly (with 10% discount) REMOVE $1,479.50 REMOVE
East Mooring Rates
Vessel Size
41' to 54' 1 41' to 45' 1 $211.60 No Change
55' and larger 1 REMOVE $252.90 REMOVE
Other
Crane REMOVE $200/hour or portion thereof REMOVE
Boat Towing Disabled Vessel Towing, PER HOUR or portion thereof 1 $100/hour or portion thereof $215 (add CPI) Water Removal (charged only if owner is notified and fails to respond)
Water Removal (charged only if owner is notified and
fails to respond), PER HOUR or portion thereof 1 $45/hour or portion thereof $61.50 (add CPI) Mooring Repair Rate Mooring Repair Rate, PER HOUR or portion thereof 1 $100/hour  or portion thereof 241 (add CPI) Marina Shower Key Marina Shower, Restroom, Gate, Hoist Keys $20 (all keys same fee) Marina Gate Key/Hoist Key REMOVE $10 REMOVE
Annual Parking Permit ‐ Marina Berth License Holder
Annual Parking Permit ‐ Marina Berth License Holder,
PER CALENDAR YEAR 1 $120/calendar year (add CPI)
Bike Locker Rental Bike Locker Rental, PER MONTH 1 $10/month (add CPI) Public Hoist on Wharf II
Public Hoist on Wharf II,
PER 15 MINUTES 1 $1.50 for 15 minutes $5.50 (add CPI)
Mooring Inspection Fee Mooring Inspection Fee (Forced) 1 $100/hour $120.50 (add CPI) Yellow Boat Dock (Dive Boat Loading and Sailing Charters) Yellow Boat Dock, PER MONTH (Dive Boat Loading and
Sailing Charters) 1 $150/month (add CPI)
Waiting List ‐ Initial Fee No Change $20 $25.50
K Tier Side‐tie Transient (no utilities, rafting required) 28' & Under (Summer)   28' & Under (Summer), PER DAY $9/day or $250/month $12.50 29' & Up (Summer)   29' & Up (Summer,) PER DAY $12/day or $335/month $18.75 28' & Under (Winter)2   28' & Under (Winter)2
, PER DAY $8/day or $225/month $11.25
29' & Up (Winter)2   29' & Up (Winter)2
, PER DAY $11/day or $310/month $17.00
Wharf I & II Transient Vessel Wharf I & II Transient Vessel 1 51' ‐ 70'   51' ‐ 70' , PER DAY $30/day (add CPI)
71' ‐ 90'   71' ‐ 90' , PER DAY $35/day (add CPI)
91' & over   91' & over, PER DAY $40/day (add CPI)
Cruise Ship Passenger Landing Fee Cruise Ship Passenger Landing Fee, PER PASSENGER 1 $7/passenger $7.50 (add CPI) Wharfage1 Wharfage
High Volume Seafood (Trawl‐caught ground fish, squid,
mackerels, sardines) $/TON
High Volume Seafood (Trawl‐caught ground fish, squid,
mackerels, sardines) $/TON 3 $7.14 (clarified footnote) High Volume Seafood (Anchovies) $/TON   High Volume Seafood (Anchovies) $/TON 3 $3.58 (clarified footnote) All Other Seafood/Sea Products Harvested by Pot, Trap,
Hooks, or By Hand (includes crustaceans and invertebrates) $/POUND
All Other Seafood/Sea Products Harvested by Pot, Trap,
Hooks, or By Hand (includes crustaceans and
invertebrates) $/POUND 4 $0.024 (clarified footnote)
Aguaculture Abalone (Less than 4" in length) $/EACH   Aguaculture Abalone (Less than 4" in length) $/EACH 4 $0.060 (clarified footnote) Aguaculture Abalone (4" or larger in length) $/EACH   Aguaculture Abalone (4" or larger in length) $/EACH 4 $0.119 (clarified footnote) Harbor footnotes:
1 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF. 1 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF, rounded down to the nearest dollar. 2 There is a single fee for K‐Tier Side‐tie Transient; a reduced fee is charged during WNo Change 3 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF, no rounding. 4 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF, rounded to the nearest mill.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 40, Packet Page 69 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 73, Packet Page 76 ATTACHMENT 2
FY22 FEE DESCRIPTION PROPOSED
FY23 NAME CHANGE FY22 FEE

PROPOSED
FY23 FEE CHANGE,
(any CPI applies July 1, 2023)

LIBRARY/MUSEUM
Overdue Fines ‐ Laptop Computers No Change $5/hour $5/hour to a max of $50 Lost/Damaged Materials ‐ Paperbacks REMOVE Youth $6 REMOVE Library Cards ‐ Out of State Resident No Change $5 for one month $10/month Pacific Biological Laboratories (public use) No Change
$18/hour/staff person M‐F 8am
to 5pm, $25/hour/staff person
at other times,
including time for travel, set up
& close‐up
$35/hour/staff person M‐F 8am to
5pm, $60/hour/staff person at
other times,
including time for travel, set up &
close‐up

PARKING
N/A ‐ New Fee Electric Vehicle Charging Rates N/A ‐ New Fee N/A ‐ New Fee Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging, PER KWH N/A ‐ New Fee $0.36 N/A ‐ New Fee Idle Fee After Designated Grace Period, PER MINUTE N/A ‐ New Fee $0.50

CEMETERY
Ground Burial for Urns
N/A ‐ New Fee Quarter Burial Site (1‐2 urns only) N/A ‐ New Fee $1686.00; $1075.25 Resident Cremains Added Plot (2nd, 3rd right etc. of Inurnment) No Change $1,333.50 $616.50 N/A ‐ New Category Ossuary‐ Scattering Garden (shared burial site) N/A ‐ New Fee
Remains added to shared burial site‐ remains not
retrievable N/A ‐ New Fee $300.00; $255.00 Resident
N/A ‐ New Fee Fetal remains N/A ‐ New Fee $50.00; $42.50 Resident Indenture/Administrative Fee
N/A ‐ New Fee Ossuary Administrative Fee N/A ‐ New Fee $30.00 Endowment Care
N/A ‐ New Fee Quarter Burial Site (1‐2 urns only) N/A ‐ New Fee $620.00 N/A ‐ New Fee Ossuary (Scattering Garden) N/A ‐ New Fee $75.00 Memorial Marker Placement ‐ Cement Border
12x36x3 inch REMOVE $480.00 REMOVE
Memorial Marker Placement – No Cement Border
12x36x3 inch REMOVE $268.00 REMOVE
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 41, Packet Page 70 ATTACHMENT 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 74, Packet Page 77 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Steve Wittry, PE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Marissa Garcia, Engineering Assistant
SUBJECT: Award a Contract in the Amount of $105,654.40 to Ampersand Contract Signing Group for the Wayfinding Sign Fabrication, Phase 2 Project ***CIP*** (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

2. Accepting all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awarding a contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Ampersand Contract Signing Group, in the amount of $105,654.40 for the Grand Total Bid;

4. Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of information required by the Project Specifications; and,

5. Authorizing staff to expend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen contingencies for timely completion of the Project.

VALUE DRIVERS:

QUALITY OF LIFE - In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

FISCAL STEWARDSHIP - Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This Project is consistent with the City Council’s Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities of Quality of Life – “Respond effectively to neighborhood concerns”, Protecting our Environment – “Continue efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions”, and Active Mobility – “Continue to enhance mobility for people of all ages and abilities.” This action is also consistent with the General Plan’s Circulation Element Policy a.1 and implements the Downtown and North Fremont Specific Plan goals to improve wayfinding, transportation and parking systems by managing them more effectively before investing in costly roadway and parking expansion projects.

Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 8.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 8., Item Page 1, Packet Page 76 ATTACHMENT 7
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 75, Packet Page 78 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

One (1) bid was received and opened by the Finance Director’s designee on June 2, 2022 as follows:

Bidder Base Bid Alt. No. 1 Alt. No. 2 Alt. No. 3 Alt. No. 4 Grand Total Ampersand Contract
Signing Group
$60,816.60 $3,681.60 $7,363.20 $3,444.00 $30,349.00 $105,654.40 Engineer’s Estimate $170,591.00 $4,808.00 $10,336.00 $8,414.00 $21,619.00 $215,768.00 Basis of award for this project is based on the Grand Total Bid.

Total Project Estimate:

Grand Total Bid $ 105,654.40
Project Contingency, 15% $ 15,849.00
Total Project Estimate (This Authorization) $ 121,503.40 Funding Sources:

Operational Improvements to Transportation Systems (CIP2012) $414,628.32 (Measure X)
As of June 2, 2022, sufficient funding is available to complete the project.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to award the contract for the Project; however, this is not recommended as the Project implements the second phase of the Wayfinding Sign Project that directs visitors and pedestrians to destinations citywide, and the Wayfinding Sign Project would remain partially completed.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 8., Item Page 2, Packet Page 77 ATTACHMENT 7
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 76, Packet Page 79 DISCUSSION:

This project would complete the second phase of the Citywide Wayfinding Sign Project. Logical wayfinding means an individual is capable of easily and successfully finding their way to their destination. An effective wayfinding program provides individuals the ability to understand where they are with respect to other key locations and to orient themselves in an appropriate direction with little effort or stress. In addition, an effective wayfinding program presents opportunities to discover new places and services.

The City adopted the Downtown and North Fremont Specific Plans and the 2012 Multi Modal Mobility Plan that require a new wayfinding system to guide visitors and residents in all modes of travel and at the correct scale. The development of a Wayfinding Sign Program created a new design theme for the City. The new theme includes easily readable fonts, white text over blue background, and a blue color palette that includes wave elements. This new design theme is being used in other City-wide graphics and promotional materials such as the website and official City presentations.

On June 26, 2019, City Council awarded a construction contract for the first phase of the Wayfinding Sign Project, which included all parking-related signs for vehicular and pedestrian wayfinding. The first phase was completed in late summer 2020. At the time, there was no funding available to complete Phase 2.

The second phase of the project includes the remaining vehicular wayfinding and pedestrian wayfinding signs. Staff re-evaluated the bid/construction process utilized for Phase 1 and revised the delivery method for Phase 2. Rather than trying to accomplish fabrication and installation under one contract as was specified in Phase 1, Phase 2 separates the fabrication of the signs and the installation of the signs/poles into two different contracts. This phase is funded through Measure X.

The project was extensively advertised, and on May 10, 2022 the City received one (1) bid.

This initial bid was deemed unresponsive due to the failure to submit a notarized original copy of the bid bond in sufficient time. Thus the bid was rejected and the project was advertised and rebid.

On June 2, 2022 the City received one (1) bid from Ampersand Contract Signing Group in Los Angeles, CA. Ampersand Contract Signing Group submitted the lowest, responsive, responsible Grand Total bid in the amount of $105,654.40 which is below the Engineer’s estimate of $215,768. The Engineer’s estimate was based on the prior Phase 1 bid, utilizing the highest pricing for the sign fabrication to allow a conservative estimate due to material price fluctuations in the current market.

References for the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Ampersand Contract Signing Group, have been checked and staff is confident in the contractor’s ability to perform this type of work successfully.

Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Approving the Specifications for the Wayfinding Sign Fabrication, Phase 2 project (“Project”) and granting the City Engineer, or designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field; Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 8., Item Page 3, Packet Page 78 ATTACHMENT 7
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 77, Packet Page 80

2. Accepting all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awarding a contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Ampersand Contract Signing Group, in the amount of $105,654.40 for the Grand Total Bid;

4. Authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of information required by the Project Specifications; and,

5. Authorizing staff to expend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen contingencies for timely completion of the Project.

SW/mg
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Raffi Varozian, Ampersand Contract Signing Group
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 8., Item Page 4, Packet Page 79 ATTACHMENT 7
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 78, Packet Page 81 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22
AWARD A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $105,654.40 TO AMPERSAND CONTRACT SIGNING GROUP FOR THE WAYFINDING SIGN FABRICATION, PHASE 2 PROJECT ***CIP***
WHEREAS, on the 2nd day of June 2022, at 2:00 pm in the City of Monterey Council Chambers, the City Finance Director’s designee received one (1) bid for the Wayfinding Sign Fabrication Project, Phase 2 (“Project”);
WHEREAS, Ampersand Contract Signing Group from Los Angeles, CA submitted the lowest, responsive, responsible grand total bid in the amount of $105,654.40; WHEREAS, sufficient funding is available for this project in the Operational Improvements to Transportation Systems project account (CIP2012); and, WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY it hereby

1. Approves the Specifications for the Wayfinding Sign Fabrication, Phase 2 project (“Project”) and grants the City Engineer, or designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Accepts all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awards a contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Ampersand Contract Signing Group, in the amount of $105,654.40 for the Grand Total Bid; Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 8., Item Page 5, Packet Page 80 ATTACHMENT 7
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 79, Packet Page 82 2 4. Authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of information required by the Project Specifications; and,

5. Authorizes staff to expend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen contingencies for timely completion of the Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 8., Item Page 6, Packet Page 81 ATTACHMENT 7
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 80, Packet Page 83 Council
Agenda Report
№07/19
FROM: Inga Waite, Library & Museums Director
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution to Appropriate Grant and Bookmobile Reserve funds and Authorize the Purchase of One (1) 2022 Mercedes Sprinter Van Bookmobile in the Amount of $213,721 Through a Contract with Farber Specialty Vehicles (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution to appropriate grant and reserve funds in order to authorize a contract to Farber Specialty Vehicles for the purchase of one (1) 2022 Mercedes FSV Sprinter Bookmobile in the amount of two hundred thirteen thousand seven hundred twenty-one dollars ($213,721) to replace the City’s aging bookmobile.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The action is consistent with the City policy to replace City vehicles and equipment when they have fulfilled their useful life cycle and are no longer economical to operate or maintain.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

A total of $213,721 is required for the purchase of one (1) Mercedes Sprinter Van Bookmobile.

Seventy-four and a half percent (74.5%) of the base cost of this project, $144,000, is supported by grant funding provided by the State of California, administered by the California State Library in the form of a “Stronger Together” grant. Grant fund expenditures are restricted to the replacement of Monterey Public Library’s bookmobile. The City has already received the first installment payment of $64,800. The second payment of $64,800 will be received after the completion of the 1st report and the balance of $14,400 will be issued after the final report is submitted to the State of California.

The balance of $69,721, which includes tax and upfitting will be covered by Monterey Public Library’s bookmobile reserve fund received from the Oler Family Trust in account 810-2661 and currently valued at $171,447. Per the terms of the bequest, the reserve fund is restricted to purchasing a new bookmobile. Any remaining funds, per the terms of the bequest, shall be allocated for bookmobile services.

Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 9.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 9., Item Page 1, Packet Page 82 ATTACHMENT 8
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 81, Packet Page 84 Replacement of the bookmobile through grant funds and a bequest releases $178,550 which had been set aside in the City’s Vehicle Replacement Fund toward the replacement cost of a new bookmobile for other vehicle purchases.

The 2022 Mercedes Sprinter Van Bookmobile will be purchased from Farber Specialty Vehicles in Columbus, Ohio, for the amount of $213,721 (including tax and upfitting) utilizing an accepted exception to the competitive procurement options set forth in Monterey Code section 28-14(b), from the City of Lowell, MA, contract number 22-48 for the amount of $191,766, as approved by the Finance Director’s authorized representative.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to replace the aging Bookmobile vehicle at this time. This action is not recommended. The City’s 2008 Ford F550 Super Duty Dallas Smith 30-foot low-floor, extrawide Bookmobile is reaching the end of its service life. It is a highly customized vehicle and is becoming increasingly expensive to maintain ($18,000 this year for fuel and maintenance). As the vehicle ages, the length of time that it is off the road for repairs increases. This negatively impacts the Library’s ability to provide equitable service to low-income, transportationchallenged households in our community, especially to children and the elderly. In addition, the length and width of the current vehicle make it a challenge for staff to operate. It has been difficult to retain a pool of staff who are trained to drive the vehicle given 2020 staffing reductions. The City’s Fleet Coordinator recommends replacing the current vehicle with a 24’ Sprinter Van because it will be easier to drive and more economical to operate. By choosing to replace the vehicle at this time, the City can use grant and bequest funds, and release vehicle replacement funds for other City vehicle needs.

DISCUSSION:

Background: Monterey Public Library’s bookmobile service launched 65-years ago in response to the closure of the City’s only branch library. It has been an essential library service ever since. The Library’s mobile branch delivers circulating materials, knowledgeable staff, internet connectivity, and fun, educational programs to residents who face challenges traveling to us.

Service was paused in 2020 when library staff was laid off due to the devastating impact of Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 9., Item Page 2, Packet Page 83 ATTACHMENT 8
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 82, Packet Page 85 Covid-19 on City finances. “Restoration of Bookmobile Service” was rated of “high importance” in the Library Board of Trustee’s Strategic Priorities Plan 2021-2023, and the Monterey Public Library Friends & Foundation provided funds to help restore a regular part-time Bookmobile coordinator position this fiscal year.

Community Needs: In Fiscal year 2021-22, with funding assistance from General Fund and the Friends & Foundation we hired a part-time bookmobile service coordinator and restored four out of 10 neighborhood stops. We prioritized stops where census data confirms that the need is greatest due to poverty levels, lack of access to a car, highest youth or highest senior population, and limited English language skills. Community aspiration conversations held with Spanish language speakers in 2020 revealed that the library is considered a trusted conduit for information about schools and community services.

A Sprinter Van is large enough to serve as a walk-on vehicle, and will meet the needs of other neighborhood stops including preschools and community centers when we can afford to restore visits to those locations. The shorter vehicle length will make it easier to take to outreach events as well.

While a Sprinter Van is smaller, it will have a bigger impact because of its flexibility. It can serve as a traditional walk-on mobile library, an Internet hotspot, and can transport the technology and materials needed to set up outdoor, or onsite program activities from Summer Reading signups and prize selection to STEAM Saturdays in the park. By using special Acore rolling carts as onboard shelves we can 1) easily customize our collection focus for the day – switching from youth, to all ages to seniors, 2) provide holds pickup and 3) create lobby stops at the senior residences and at preschools to reduce crowding while browsing, and eliminate the need for patrons to use stairs or a ramp. A wheelchair lift is also included.

A Sprinter Van is a more cost-effective choice because maintenance and fuel costs for operating a new, smaller vehicle will be significantly reduced. As a vehicle ages the maintenance costs increase. The maintenance and fuel budget for our 13-year-old vehicle is $18,000 this year. The Sprinter Van is also more cost-effective because we can train more staff to drive it, and deploy staff with specialized skills as needed to stops.

Summary: The Board of Library Trustees recommends that Council approve the attached resolution authorizing a contract to Farber Specialty Vehicles for the purchase of one (1) 2022 Mercedes Sprinter Van in the amount of $213,721 using a grant of $144,000 from the State of California by the State of California administered by the California State Library and $69,721 Monterey Public Library Bookmobile Reserve (Oler Family Trust).

The Board of Library Trustees recommends this action in order to replace our aging 30’ lowfloor, extra-wide bookmobile with a 24’ greener, easier to drive Mercedes Sprinter Van. The replacement of the aging vehicle will strengthen equitable, inclusive library service in our community and continue to deliver customized library service to low-income, isolated, and transportation challenged residents. All mobile branch patrons, especially children and the elderly, will continue to be empowered and enriched by access to library materials, knowledgeable staff, fun, educational programs, take-and-make projects, and our mobile Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 9., Item Page 3, Packet Page 84 ATTACHMENT 8
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 83, Packet Page 86 Internet hotspot. Utilization of these two funding sources to replace the aging bookmobile, releases $178,550 in the City’s vehicle replacement fund that had been set aside towards bookmobile replacement to be used for other vehicle needs.

Attachment: 1. Resolution
e: Farber Specialty Vehicles, 7052 Americana Pkwy., Columbus, OH 43068 Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 9., Item Page 4, Packet Page 85 ATTACHMENT 8
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 84, Packet Page 87 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№07/19

AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION OF GRANT AND BOOKMOBILE RESERVE FUNDS TO REPLACE THE AGING BOOKMOBILE WITH THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) 2022 MERCEDES SPRINTER VAN BOOKMOBILE IN THE AMOUNT OF $213,721 THROUGH A

CONTRACT WITH FARBER SPECIALTY VEHICLES
WHEREAS, the State of California provided a “Stronger Together” grant of $144,000 administered by the State Library to cover 74.5% of bookmobile replacement; WHEREAS, the Monterey Public Library Bookmobile Reserve Fund (Oler Family Trust) in the Library Trust Fund will cover the balance of $49,326 and the additional $20,395 in tax and upfitting costs associated with the purchase;
WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a contract with Farber Specialty Vehicles under Lowell, MA Contract No. 22-48 for the purchase of one (1) 2022 Mercedes Sprinter Van Bookmobile. The request for a “piggyback” purchase per Monterey City Code section 28-14 (b) was approved by the Finance Department on May 31, 2022; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby appropriates $144,000 in State of California grant funds and Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 9., Item Page 5, Packet Page 86 ATTACHMENT 8
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 85, Packet Page 88 2 $69,721 in Bookmobile Reserve Funds, account 810-2661 and approves the purchase of one (1) 2022 Mercedes Sprinter Van Bookmobile for a total cost of $213,721.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 9., Item Page 6, Packet Page 87 ATTACHMENT 8
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 86, Packet Page 89 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Steve Wittry, P.E., Public Works Director
Prepared By: Tom Harty, P.E., QSD, Senior Engineer, NCIP Staff Coordinator SUBJECT: Appropriate $27,000.00 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account to the Aeneas Bridge Restoration Project Account (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31) ***NCIP*** RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appropriate $27,000.00 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account (31nunap) to the Aeneas Bridge Restoration project account (36n1731).

VALUE DRIVERS:

FISCAL STEWARDSHIP – Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This Project is consistent with the City Council’s Vision and Strategic Priorities of “Working to improve the quality of life of our residents” by maintaining our existing infrastructure.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

A supplemental appropriation of $27,000.00 from the NCIP Ending Balance (31nunap) to the Aeneas Bridge Restoration Project Account (36n1731) will allow the project to move forward:

Estimated Project Costs
Study and Report Preparation $ 37,000
Project Management $ 8,000
Total $ 45,000
Current Available Funding
Aeneas Bridge Restoration Project (36n1731) $18,756.97
Supplemental Appropriation of End. Bal. (this recommendation) $27,000.00 Total $45,756.97
Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 10.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 10., Item Page 1, Packet Page 88 ATTACHMENT 9
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 87, Packet Page 90 As of June 6, 2022, the Ending Balance Account balance is $774,317.14. Therefore, sufficient funding is available in the Ending Balance Account. On June 21, 2021 staff anticipates that there will be a total of four (4) items that will impact the account balance. If all items are approved by Council, the total appropriation of this fund will be $205,000.

Approval of this action will provide sufficient funding to complete this project.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31) because the project proposes the maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation or reconstruction of a historical resource in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 31.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project involves the maintenance and repair of a historical resource, and no additions or expansions would take place.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to the limited maintenance and repair scope, which would be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The subject historical resource is not located near or visible from a scenic highway. Therefore, impacts to scenic highways would not occur.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 10., Item Page 2, Packet Page 89 ATTACHMENT 9
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 88, Packet Page 91 Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project proposes the maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation or reconstruction of a historical resource in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Therefore, impacts to historical resources would not occur.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could decide to close the underfunded project. This is not recommended because City Council approved the project in 2016 and closing the project would now result in an incomplete project.

DISCUSSION:

The Aeneas Bridge Restoration Project was approved by Council on June 7, 2016 as part of the FY 2016/17 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program and was funded for $25,000.

The project description is: Investigate the structural condition of the city-owned Aeneas Bridge and do needed deferred maintenance, addressing extensive rust, missing flashing, and need of fresh paint. The extent of structural improvement needed is unknown at this time.

A consultant was retained to perform the structural analysis for this project, but the project did not commence due to the inability to obtain a qualified subcontractor. A second consultant provided an estimate in March 2021 for the structural analysis and historic preservation study, but the estimate of $29,935 exceeded the remaining project budget.

In order to move this project forward, a supplemental appropriation of $27,000 is required for this project. The current balance of the NCIP Ending Balance account is $774,317.14.

Therefore, sufficient funding is available in that account.

During their June 2, 2022 meeting, the NCIP Committee voted to approve this recommendation to Council.

Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council appropriate $27,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account to the Aeneas Bridge Restoration Project Account.

SW/th
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Committee Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 10., Item Page 3, Packet Page 90 ATTACHMENT 9
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 89, Packet Page 92 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22
APPROPRIATE $27,000.00 FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ENDING BALANCE ACCOUNT TO THE AENEAS BRIDGE RESTORATION PROJECT ACCOUNT ***NCIP***
WHEREAS, the Aeneas Bridge Restoration Project (36n1731) was approved by Council on June 7, 2016 as part of the FY 2016/17 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program and was funded for $25,000;
WHEREAS, in order to move this project forward, a supplemental appropriation of $27,000 is required for this project;
WHEREAS, the current balance of the NCIP Ending Balance account is $774,317.14; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31) because the project proposes the maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation or reconstruction of a historical resource in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project involves the maintenance and repair of a historical resource, and no additions or expansions would take place.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to the limited maintenance and repair scope, which would be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 10., Item Page 4, Packet Page 91 ATTACHMENT 9
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 90, Packet Page 93 2 negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The subject historical resource is not located near or visible from a scenic highway. Therefore, impacts to scenic highways would not occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project proposes the maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation or reconstruction of a historical resource in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Therefore, impacts to historical resources would not occur.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby appropriates $27,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account (31nunap) to the Aeneas Bridge Restoration Project Account (36n1731).

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 10., Item Page 5, Packet Page 92 ATTACHMENT 9
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 91, Packet Page 94 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Steve Wittry, P.E., Public Works Director
Prepared By: Tom Harty, P.E., QSD, Senior Engineer, NCIP Staff Coordinator SUBJECT: Appropriate $10,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account to the Fishermen’s Flats Traffic Calming Plan Project Account (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15306, Class 6) ***NCIP***
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appropriate $10,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account (31nunap) to the Fishermen’s Flats Traffic Calming Plan Project Account (37n1443).

VALUE DRIVERS:

ACTIVE MOBILITY – Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This Project is consistent with the City Council’s Vision and Strategic Initiative of “Working to improve the quality of life of our residents” by maintaining our existing infrastructure.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

A supplemental appropriation of $10,000 from the NCIP Ending Balance (31nunap) to the Fishermen’s Flats Traffic Calming Plan project account (37n1443) will allow the project to move forward:

Estimated Project Costs
Report Completion (Kimley-Horn) $ 8,000
Project Management $ 2,000
Total $ 10,000
Current Available Funding
Fishermen’s Flats Traffic Calming Plan (37n1443) $ 0
Supplemental Appropriation (this recommendation) $ 10,000 Total $ 10,000
Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 11.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 11., Item Page 1, Packet Page 93 ATTACHMENT 10
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 92, Packet Page 95 As of June 6, 2022, the Ending Balance Account balance is $774,317.14. Therefore, sufficient funding is available in the Ending Balance Account. On June 21, 2022 staff anticipates that there will be a total of four (4) items that will impact the account balance. If all items are approved by Council, the total appropriation of this fund will be $205,000.

Approval of this action will provide sufficient funding to complete this project.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15306, Class 6) because the proposed action includes basic data collection, research, experimental management and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource. These efforts may be strictly for information gathering purposes, or as part of a study leading to an action which a public agency has not yet approved, adopted or funded. Any subsequent discretionary projects, including specific design-level projects resulting from the recommendations of the Traffic Calming Plan, will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Preparation of the study would not produce a physical change in the environment.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. Preparation of the study would not produce a physical change in the environment.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Preparation of the study would not produce a physical change in the environment.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 11., Item Page 2, Packet Page 94 ATTACHMENT 10
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 93, Packet Page 96 Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Preparation of the study would not produce a physical change in the environment.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could decide to close the underfunded project. This is not recommended because City Council approved the project in 2013 and closing the project would now result in an incomplete project.

DISCUSSION:

Funding for Fishermen’s Flats Traffic Calming Plan was approved by Council on July 2, 2013 as part of the FY 2013/2014 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program in the amount of $60,000.

The project description is: Create a traffic calming plan for Fishermen Flats. Traffic calming plan to concentrate on slowing traffic between sections of Josselyn Canyon Road from Deer Flats to Hwy 68 as well as Via Isola, which has many pedestrians walking along it to Foothill School site.

Staff completed outreach and public comment in late 2019. Unfortunately, due to Covid, the project was not brought forward to the City Council for approval until August 3, 2021. Through public testimony received at the Council meeting, a neighborhood representative was concerned over the inclusion of a single project concept. Council determined that the issue should be clarified before ratification and voted to table the item. The current project balance is $0.

In order to move this project forward, a supplemental appropriation of $10,000 is required to hold an additional public neighborhood meeting and revise the current Traffic Calming Plan as needed. The current balance of the NCIP Ending Balance account is $774,317.14. Therefore, sufficient funding is available in that account.

During their June 2, 2022 meeting, the NCIP Committee voted to recommend approval of this action to Council. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council appropriate $10,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account (31nunap) to the Fishermen’s Flats Traffic Calming Plan Project Account (37n1443).

SW/th
Attachments: 1. Resolution
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 11., Item Page 3, Packet Page 95 ATTACHMENT 10
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 94, Packet Page 97 e: Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Committee Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 11., Item Page 4, Packet Page 96 ATTACHMENT 10
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 95, Packet Page 98 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22
APPROPRIATE $10,000 FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ENDING BALANCE ACCOUNT TO THE FISHERMEN’S FLATS TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN PROJECT ACCOUNT ***NCIP***
WHEREAS, funding for the Fishermen’s Flats Traffic Calming Plan (37n1443) was approved by Council on July 2, 2013 as part of the FY 2013/2014 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program and was funded for $60,000; WHEREAS, in order to move this project forward, a supplemental appropriation of $10,000 is required to hold an additional public neighborhood meeting and revise the current Traffic Calming Plan as needed;
WHEREAS, the current balance of the NCIP Ending Balance account is $774,317.14; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15306, Class 6) because the proposed action includes basic data collection, research, experimental management and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource. These efforts may be strictly for information gathering purposes, or as part of a study leading to an action which a public agency has not yet approved, adopted or funded. Any subsequent discretionary projects, including specific designlevel projects resulting from the recommendations of the Traffic Calming Plan, will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Preparation of the study would not produce a physical change in the environment.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. Preparation of the study would not produce a physical change in the environment.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Preparation of the study would not produce a physical change in the environment.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 11., Item Page 5, Packet Page 97 ATTACHMENT 10
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 96, Packet Page 99 2 Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Preparation of the study would not produce a physical change in the environment.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Preparation of the study would not produce a physical change in the environment.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Preparation of the study would not produce a physical change in the environment. Therefore, impacts to historic and archaeological resources would not occur, and;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it appropriate $10,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account (31nunap) to the Fishermen’s Flats Traffic Calming Plan Project Account (37n1443).

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 11., Item Page 6, Packet Page 98 ATTACHMENT 10
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 97, Packet Page 100 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Steve Wittry, P.E., Public Works Director
Prepared By: Tom Harty, P.E., QSD, Senior Engineer, NCIP Staff Coordinator SUBJECT: Appropriate $118,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account to the Pearl/Figueroa Street Intersection Project Account (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***NCIP***
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appropriate $118,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account (31nunap) to the Pearl/Figueroa Street Intersection Project Account (NIP2027).

VALUE DRIVERS:

ACTIVE MOBILITY – Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This Project is consistent with the City Council’s Vision and Strategic Initiative of “Working to improve the quality of life of our residents” by maintaining our existing infrastructure.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

A supplemental appropriation of $118,000 from the NCIP Ending Balance (31nunap) to the Pearl/Figueroa Street Intersection project account (NIP2027) will allow the project to move forward:

Estimated Project Costs
Construction $ 190,000
Construction Contingency (15%) $ 28,500
Construction Management $ 15,500
Total $ 234,000
Current Available Funding
Pearl/Figueroa Street Intersection (NIP2027) $116,146.10 Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 12.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 12., Item Page 1, Packet Page 99 ATTACHMENT 11
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 98, Packet Page 101 Supplemental Appropriation (this recommendation) $118,000.00 Total $234,146.10
As of June 6, 2022, the Ending Balance Account balance is $774,317.14. Therefore, sufficient funding is available in the Ending Balance Account. On June 21, 2021 staff anticipates that there will be a total of four (4) items that will impact the account balance. If all items are approved by Council, the total appropriation of this fund will be $205,000.

Approval of this action will provide sufficient funding to complete this project.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project proposes the improvement of existing curbs at the intersection of Pearl Street and Figueroa Street, specifically the removal of the existing curbs and gutters, and asphalt concrete pavement and base; and the construction of new ADA curb ramps and bulb outs to improve street alignment and shorten pedestrian crossing distance. The project includes traffic paint to mark pedestrian crossings, and stormwater infrastructure improvements. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 12., Item Page 2, Packet Page 100 ATTACHMENT 11
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 99, Packet Page 102 Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impacts to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code would occur.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could recommend that staff redesign the project to bring it within the established budget. This is not recommended as the current design has been coordinated extensively and any redesign work will increase costs and cause delays to implementation.

City Council could decide to close the underfunded project. This is not recommended because City Council approved the project in 2019 and closing the project would now result in an incomplete project.

DISCUSSION:

The Pearl/Figueroa Street Intersection Project (NIP2027) was approved by Council on October 15, 2019 as part of the FY 2019/20 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program and was funded for $158,000.

The project description is: Reforming the curb ramps and (pedestrian) travel distances at the intersections of Figueroa and Pearl Street.

Due to the economic and supply chain impacts caused by the global COVID-19 pandemic, it has been determined that the current funding is not sufficient to complete the project. The cost to complete the project is estimated to be $76,000 higher than the funded amount of $158,000.

As a consequence of the scarcity of construction materials and the fact that contractors are in high demand, it is believed that the costs accurately reflect the current state of the economy.

In order to move this project forward, a supplemental appropriation of $118,000 is required for this project. The current balance of the NCIP Ending Balance account is $774,317.14.

Therefore, sufficient funding is available in that account.

During their June 2, 2022 meeting, the NCIP Committee voted to approve this recommendation to Council.

Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council appropriate $118,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account to the Pearl/Figueroa Street Intersection project account.

SW/th
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 12., Item Page 3, Packet Page 101 ATTACHMENT 11
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 100, Packet Page 103 Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Committee Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 12., Item Page 4, Packet Page 102 ATTACHMENT 11
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 101, Packet Page 104 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22
APPROPRIATE $118,000 FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ENDING BALANCE ACCOUNT (31NUNAP) TO THE PEARL/FIGUEROA STREET INTERSECTION (NIP2027) PROJECT ACCOUNT ***NCIP*** WHEREAS, the Pearl/Figueroa Street Intersection Project (NIP2027) was approved by Council on October 15, 2019 as part of the FY 2019/20 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program and was funded for $158,000;
WHEREAS, due to the economic and supply chain impacts caused by the global COVID-19 pandemic, it has been determined that the current funding is not sufficient to complete the project;
WHEREAS, in order to move this project forward, $118,000 is required for this project; WHEREAS, the current balance of the NCIP Ending Balance account is $774,317.14; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project proposes the improvement of existing curbs at the intersection of Pearl Street and Figueroa Street, specifically the removal of the existing curbs and gutters, and asphalt concrete pavement and base; and the construction of new ADA curb ramps and bulb outs to improve street alignment and shorten pedestrian crossing distance. The project includes traffic paint to mark pedestrian crossings, and stormwater infrastructure improvements.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 12., Item Page 5, Packet Page 103 ATTACHMENT 11
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 102, Packet Page 105 2 Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The proposed improvements are at grade and would replace pavement in-kind; therefore, no impacts to scenic highways will occur.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it appropriate $118,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program Ending Balance Account (31nunap) to the Pearl/Figueroa Street Intersection project account (NIP2027).

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 12., Item Page 6, Packet Page 104 ATTACHMENT 11
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 103, Packet Page 106 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Rafaela T. King, Finance Director
Prepared by: Carol Hewitt, Finance Analyst
SUBJECT: Repeal Resolutions 14,037; 14,038; and 14,056 Effective June 30, 2022 and Terminate Revenue Sharing with the City of Pacific Grove for 300 David Avenue Monterey Effective July 1, 2022 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

Repeal Resolutions 14,037, 14,038, 14,056 effective June 30, 2022 and terminate revenue sharing of sales tax, business license tax, and utility user’s taxes generated from 300 David Avenue Monterey APN 00175002000 with the City of Pacific Grove effective July 1, 2022.

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

City Council adopted Resolution 22-048 providing notice of intent to repeal Resolutions 14,037, 14,038, 14,056 effective June 30, 2022 and to terminate revenue-sharing with the City of Pacific Grove for 300 David Avenue in Monterey effective July 1, 2022. This action is consistent with the Monterey City Code on business license tax, public utilities use tax, and sales and use tax (Monterey City Code sections 19-4 et seq. [business license tax], Section 35-40 et seq. [Public Utilities Use Tax], Section 35-3 et seq. [sales and use tax]).

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The projected revenue increase in sales and business license revenue for the City of Monterey for FY23 will contribute to the City’s General Fund. Due to confidentiality requirements, specific revenue estimates are not able to be published.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 13.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 13., Item Page 1, Packet Page 105 ATTACHMENT 12
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 104, Packet Page 107 environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

No alternatives are proposed.

DISCUSSION:

Overview
On May 3, 2022, City Council adopted Resolution 22-048 providing notice of intent to repeal Resolutions 14,037; 14,038; and 14,056 with an effective date of June 30, 2022 and notice of intent that effective July 1, 2022, sales tax, business license tax, and utility user’s taxes generated from APN 00175002000 will not to be shared with the City of Pacific Grove, and shall be collected pursuant to Monterey City Code sections 19-4 et seq. [business license tax], Section 35-40 et seq. [Public Utilities Use Tax], Section 35-3 et seq. [sales and use tax], as those sections may be amended or superseded.

Since the late 1970s, the City of Monterey has maintained revenue-sharing with the City of Pacific Grove regarding the apportionment of sales tax, business license tax, and utility user tax. However, the restaurant operating at 300 David Avenue is entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits. Therefore, City Council provided notice of intent to terminate revenuesharing with the City of Pacific Grove.

Site Information
300 David Avenue, Monterey, is sited entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits.

Attachment 2 provides a view of the Parcel Map for this address and APN 001075002000.

First Awakenings is the restaurant currently operating at 300 David Avenue, Monterey, and it has a State of California Seller’s Permit for the Monterey location. The First Awakenings restaurant has 1,449 sq. feet of interior seating area and 1,513 sq. feet of exterior seating area, requiring 44 parking spaces. First Awakenings provides 45 parking spaces entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits.

History
On December 12, 1978, the City of Monterey conceptually approved Use Permit 78-75, with conditions held in abeyance for restaurant use (Bob’s Big Boy) at 300 David Avenue, Monterey, CA (APN 001075002000), and a certificate of occupancy was granted in August 1980.

On November 20, 1979, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 14,037 to share revenue generated from Bob’s Big Boy restaurant, which was to operate in the block bounded by David Avenue and Lighthouse Avenue in Monterey, and Eardley Avenue and Central Avenue in Pacific Grove. This was a joint resolution with the City of Pacific Grove, which adopted Resolution 5319 on November 20, 1979. The apportionment was for the City of Pacific Grove Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 13., Item Page 2, Packet Page 106 ATTACHMENT 12
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 105, Packet Page 108 to collect and retain the Business License Tax and the City of Monterey to collect and retain the Utility User Tax.

On November 20, 1979, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 14,038, indicating that both cities provide municipal services to the Bob’s Big Boy restaurant and that the sales tax revenue should be apportioned 58% to the City of Monterey and 42% to the City of Pacific Grove because it was “impossible to determine the situs of sales tax generation within the restaurant.” This was a joint resolution with the City of Pacific Grove, which adopted Resolution 5318 on November 20, 1979.

On December 18, 1979, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 14,056, amending Resolution 14,038, to clarify that the City of Monterey would collect revenue from the California State Board of Equalization and apportion the funds between the two cities because, according to the agenda report, “it is necessary to have one of the involved cities collect the money and physically make the distribution since the state cannot divide the funds without a vote of the electorate at a general election pursuant to Article XIII of the California Constitution.” Pacific Grove adopted Resolution 5424 on January 20, 1982, to mirror the City of Monterey’s Resolution.

California Constitution and State Law
From the time it was enacted in 1974 until it was amended in 1998, the California Constitution, Article 13, Section 29, authorized “…the Legislature to authorize cities to enter into contracts to apportion between them the revenue derived from any sale or use tax imposed by them that is collected for them by the State. Before the contract becomes operative, it shall be authorized by a majority of those voting on the question in each jurisdiction at a general or direct primary election.”
Cities must contract with the State Board of Equalization to perform all functions incident to the administration or operation of sales tax pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code section 7202. The Legislature authorized, and still authorizes, cities to apportion revenue (i.e., as defined in Government Code section 55702 - Bradley Burns Uniform Sales and Use Tax) from tangible personal property retail sales pursuant to Government Code section 55704. The contract, and resolutions approving the contract, are to be transmitted to the State Board of Equalization to allocate the funds pursuant to Government Code section 55706.

A revenue-sharing contract between the City of Monterey and the City of Pacific Grove was not authorized by a majority vote of the electorate in either city, or transmitted to the State Board of Equalization for allocation.

In 1998, the California Constitution was amended to allow revenue sharing contracts approved by a two-thirds vote of each affected jurisdiction’s governing body without having to go to a vote of the electorate.

Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Taxes are allocated “to the place where the sale is deemed to take place….” For First Awakenings, the “principal negotiations are carried on” and “the order is taken” in the City of Monterey. The City of Monterey is, therefore, the place of Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 13., Item Page 3, Packet Page 107 ATTACHMENT 12
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 106, Packet Page 109 business for purposes of Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Taxes pursuant to 18 California Code of Regulation section 1802.

Summary
Following its action to provide notice of intent per Resolution 22-048, City Council is asked to repeal Resolutions 14,037, 14,038, 14,056 effective June 30, 2022 and terminate revenue sharing sales tax, business license tax, and utility user’s taxes generated from 300 David Avenue Monterey APN 00175002000 with the City of Pacific Grove effective July 1, 2022, and to direct the City Clerk to send this resolution to the City of Pacific Grove, and the property owner, and the business owner for 300 David Avenue, Monterey, within three days of its passage.

RTK/ch
Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution
c: Property Owner, 300 David Ave., Monterey, CA
Business Owner, 300 David Ave., Monterey, CA
e: City of Pacific Grove, City Clerk
Stella Sandoval, Senior Accountant, City of Monterey
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 13., Item Page 4, Packet Page 108 ATTACHMENT 12
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 107, Packet Page 110 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22
REPEAL RESOLUTIONS 14,037; 14,038; AND 14,056 EFFECTIVE JUNE 30, 2022 AND TERMINATE REVENUE SHARING WITH THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE FOR 300 DAVID AVENUE MONTEREY EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2022
WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022 the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 22-048, providing notice of intent to repeal Resolutions 14,037; 14,038; and 14,056 with an effective date of June 30, 2022 and notice of intent that effective July 1, 2022, sales tax, business license tax, and utility user’s taxes generated from APN 00175002000 will not to be shared with the City of Pacific Grove, and shall be collected pursuant to Monterey City Code sections 19-4 et seq. [business license tax], Section 35-40 et seq. [Public Utilities Use Tax], Section 35-3 et seq. [sales and use tax], as those sections may be amended or superseded; WHEREAS, on December 12, 1978, the city conceptually approved Use Permit 78-75, with conditions held in abeyance for restaurant use (Bob’s Big Boy) at 300 David Avenue, Monterey, CA (APN 001075002000), and a certificate of occupancy was granted in August 1980;
WHEREAS, on November 20, 1979, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 14,037 to share revenue generated from the Bob’s Big Boy restaurant which was to operate in the block bounded by David Avenue and Lighthouse Avenue in Monterey, and Eardley Avenue and Central Avenue in Pacific Grove. This was a joint resolution with the City of Pacific Grove, which adopted Resolution 5319 on November 20, 1979. The apportionment was for the City of Pacific Grove to collect and retain the business license tax and the City of Monterey to collect and retain the utility user’s tax;
WHEREAS, on November 20, 1979, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 14,038, indicating that both cities provide municipal services to Bob’s Big Boy restaurant and that the sales tax revenue should be apportioned 58% to the City of Monterey and 42% to the City of Pacific Grove because it was “impossible to determine the situs of sales tax generation within the restaurant.” This was a joint resolution with the City of Pacific Grove, which adopted Resolution 5318 on November 20, 1979;
WHEREAS, on December 18, 1979, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 14,056, amending Resolution 14,038, to clarify that the City of Monterey would collect revenue from the California State Board of Equalization and apportion the funds between the two cities because, according to the agenda report, “it is necessary to have one of the involved cities collect the money and physically make the distribution since the state cannot divide the funds without a vote of the electorate at a general election pursuant to Article XIII of the California Constitution.” Pacific Grove adopted Resolution 5424 on January 20, 1982, to mirror the City of Monterey’s Resolution;
WHEREAS, from the time it was enacted in 1974 until it was amended in 1998, the California Constitution, Article 13, Section 29, authorized “…the Legislature to authorize cities to enter into contracts to apportion between them the revenue derived from any sale or use Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 13., Item Page 5, Packet Page 109 ATTACHMENT 12
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 108, Packet Page 111 2 tax imposed by them that is collected for them by the State. Before the contract becomes operative, it shall be authorized by a majority of those voting on the question in each jurisdiction at a general or direct primary election.”
WHEREAS, cities must contract with the State Board of Equalization to perform all functions incident to the administration or operation of sales tax pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code section 7202. The Legislature authorized, and still authorizes, cities to apportion revenue (i.e., as defined in Government Code section 55702 - Bradley Burns Uniform Sales and Use Tax) from tangible personal property retail sales pursuant to Government Code section55704. The contract, and resolutions approving the contract, are to be transmitted to the State Board of Equalization to allocate the funds pursuant to Government Code section 55706;
WHEREAS, a revenue sharing between the City of Monterey and the City of Pacific Grove was not authorized by a majority vote of the electorate in either city, or transmitted to the State Board of Equalization for allocation;
WHEREAS, in 1998, the California Constitution was amended to allow revenue sharing contracts approved by two-thirds vote of each affected jurisdiction’s governing body without having to go to a vote of the electorate;
WHEREAS, 300 David Avenue, Monterey, is sited entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits. The City of Pacific Grove has not been providing any municipal services to 300 David Avenue, Monterey;
WHEREAS, First Awakenings is the restaurant currently operating at 300 David Avenue, Monterey, and it has a State of California Seller’s Permit for the Monterey location.

The First Awakenings restaurant has 1,449 sq. feet of interior seating area and 1,513 sq. feet of exterior seating area, requiring 44 parking spaces. First Awakenings provides 45 parking spaces entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits; WHEREAS, Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Taxes are allocated “to the place where the sale is deemed to take place….” For First Awakenings, the “principal negotiations are carried on” and “the order is taken” in the City of Monterey. The City of Monterey is therefore the place of business for purposes of Bradley-Burnes Uniform Local Sales and Use Taxes pursuant to 18 California Code of Regulation section 1802; WHEREAS, because the restaurant operating at 300 David Avenue is entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits, the factual basis supporting the prior revenue-sharing joint resolutions with the City of Pacific Grove no longer exists, and therefore revenue sharing with Pacific Grove is neither equitable nor legally supportable; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 13., Item Page 6, Packet Page 110 ATTACHMENT 12
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 109, Packet Page 112 3 a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.

2. The City Council repeals Resolutions 14,037, 14,038, and 14,056 with an effective date of June 30, 2022.

3. Effective July 1, 2022, sales tax, business license tax, and utility user’s taxes generated from APN 00175002000 will not to be shared with the City of Pacific Grove, and shall be collected pursuant to Monterey City Code sections 19-4 et seq. [business license tax], Section 35-40 et seq. [Public Utilities Use Tax], Section 35-3 et seq. [sales and use tax], as those sections may be amended or superseded.

4. The City Clerk is directed to send this Resolution to the City of Pacific Grove, and to the property owner and to the business owner for 300 David Avenue, Monterey, within three days of its passage.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 13., Item Page 7, Packet Page 111 ATTACHMENT 12
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 110, Packet Page 113 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Rafaela T. King, Finance Director
Prepared by: Carol Hewitt, Finance Analyst
SUBJECT: Repeal Resolutions 82-4 and 82-5 Effective June 30, 2022 and Terminate Revenue Sharing with the City of Pacific Grove for 902 Lighthouse Ave Monterey Effective July 1, 2022 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

Repeal Resolutions 82-4 and 82-5 effective June 30, 2022 and terminate revenue sharing of sales tax, business license tax, and utility user’s taxes generated from 902 Lighthouse Avenue Monterey APN 001014004000 with the City of Pacific Grove effective July 1, 2022.

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

City Council adopted Resolution 22-049 providing notice of intent to repeal Resolutions 82-4 and 82-5 effective June 30, 2022 and to terminate revenue-sharing with the City of Pacific Grove for 902 Lighthouse Avenue in Monterey effective July 1, 2022. This action is consistent with the Monterey City Code on business license tax, public utilities use tax, and sales and use tax (Monterey City Code sections 19-4 et seq. [business license tax], Section 35-40 et seq. [Public Utilities Use Tax], Section 35-3 et seq. [sales and use tax]).

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The projected revenue increase in sales and potential utilities use tax revenue for the City of Monterey for FY23 will contribute to the City’s General Fund. Due to confidentiality requirements, specific revenue estimates are not able to be published.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 14., Item Page 1, Packet Page 112 ATTACHMENT 13
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 111, Packet Page 114 CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

No alternatives are proposed.

DISCUSSION:

Overview
On May 3, 2022 City Council adopted Resolution 22-049 providing notice of intent repeal Resolutions 82-4 and 82-5 effective June 30, 2022 and to terminate revenue-sharing with the City of Pacific Grove for 902 Lighthouse Avenue in Monterey effective July 1, 2022. This action is consistent with the Monterey City Code on business license tax, public utilities use tax, and sales and use tax (Monterey City Code sections 19-4 et seq. [business license tax], Section 35- 40 et seq. [Public Utilities Use Tax], Section 35-3 et seq. [sales and use tax]).

Since the late 1970s, the City of Monterey has maintained revenue-sharing with the City of Pacific Grove regarding the apportionment of sales tax, business license tax, and utility user tax. It is inequitable to continue revenue-sharing with the City of Pacific Grove for 902 Lighthouse Avenue in Monterey because the restaurant operating at 902 Lighthouse Avenue is entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits. Therefore, City Council provided notice of intent to terminate revenue-sharing with the City of Pacific Grove.

Site Information
The parcel for 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey is sited almost entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits. The City of Pacific Grove is not providing any municipal services to 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey;
Carl’s Jr. is the restaurant currently operating at 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey, and it has a State of California Seller’s Permit for the Monterey location.

History
On May 12, 1981, the city approved Use Permit 81-32, with conditions, for restaurant use (Carl’s Jr.) at 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey, CA (APN 001014004000).

The City of Monterey granted a certificate of occupancy in February 1982.

On January 5, 1982, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 82-4 to share revenue generated from the Carl’s Jr. restaurant. This was a joint resolution with the City of Pacific Grove, which adopted Resolution 5425 on January 20, 1982. The apportionment was for the City of Pacific Grove to collect and retain the utility user’s tax, and for the City of Monterey to Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 14., Item Page 2, Packet Page 113 ATTACHMENT 13
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 112, Packet Page 115 collect and retain the business license tax for purposes of eliminating unnecessary administrative expenses.

On January 5, 1982, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 82-5, indicating that both cities provide municipal services to the Carl’s Jr. restaurant and that the sales tax revenue should be apportioned 55% to the City of Monterey and 45% to the City of Pacific Grove because it was “impossible to determine the situs of sales tax generation within the restaurant.” This was a joint resolution with the City of Pacific Grove, which adopted Resolution 5424 on January 20, 1982.

A revenue-sharing contract between the City of Monterey and the City of Pacific Grove was not authorized by a majority vote of the electorate in either city or transmitted to the State Board of Equalization for allocation.

Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Taxes are allocated “to the place where the sale is deemed to take place….” For Carl’s Jr., the “principal negotiations are carried on” and “the order is taken” in the City of Monterey. The restaurant is located entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits. The City of Monterey is therefore the place of business for purposes of Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Taxes pursuant to 18 California Code of Regulation section 1802.

Summary
Following its action to provide notice of intent per Resolution 22-049, City Council is asked to repeal Resolutions 82-4 and 82-5 effective June 30, 2022 and terminate revenue sharing of sales tax, business license tax, and utility user’s taxes generated from 902 Lighthouse Avenue Monterey APN 001014004000 with the City of Pacific Grove effective July 1, 2022, and to direct the City Clerk to send this Resolution to the City of Pacific Grove, and to the property Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 14., Item Page 3, Packet Page 114 ATTACHMENT 13
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 113, Packet Page 116 owner and to the business owner for 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey, within three days of its passage.

RTK/ch
Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution
cc: Property Owner, 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey, CA Business Owner, 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey, CA
e: City of Pacific Grove, City Clerk
Stella Sandoval, Senior Accountant, City of Monterey
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 14., Item Page 4, Packet Page 115 ATTACHMENT 13
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 114, Packet Page 117 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/22
REPEAL RESOLUTIONS 82-4 AND 82-5 EFFECTIVE JUNE 30, 2022 AND TERMINATE REVENUE SHARING WITH THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE FOR 902 LIGHTHOUSE AVE MONTEREY EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2022
WHEREAS, On May 3, 2022 City Council adopted Resolution 22-049 providing notice of intent repeal Resolutions 82-4 and 82-5 effective June 30, 2022 and to terminate revenuesharing with the City of Pacific Grove for 902 Lighthouse Avenue in Monterey effective July 1, 2022. This action is consistent with the Monterey City Code on business license tax, public utilities use tax, and sales and use tax (Monterey City Code sections 19-4 et seq. [business license tax], Section 35-40 et seq. [Public Utilities Use Tax], Section 35-3 et seq. [sales and use tax]);
WHEREAS, on May 12, 1981, the city approved Use Permit 81-32, with conditions, for restaurant use (Carl’s Jr.) at 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey, CA (APN 001014004000);
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey granted a certificate of occupancy in February 1982; WHEREAS, on January 5, 1982, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 82-4 to share revenue generated from the Carl’s Jr. restaurant. This was a joint resolution with the City of Pacific Grove, which adopted Resolution 5425 on January 20, 1982. The apportionment was for the City of Pacific Grove to collect and retain the utility user’s tax, and the City of Monterey to collect and retain the business license tax for purposes of eliminating unnecessary administrative expense;
WHEREAS, on January 5, 1982, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution 82-5, indicating that both cities provide municipal services to the Carl’s Jr. restaurant and that the sales tax revenue should be apportioned 55% to the City of Monterey and 45% to the City of Pacific Grove because it was “impossible to determine the situs of sales tax generation within the restaurant.” This was a joint resolution with the City of Pacific Grove, which adopted Resolution 5424 on January 20, 1982;
WHEREAS, from the time it was enacted in 1974 until it was amended in 1998, the California Constitution, Article 13, Section 29, authorized “…the Legislature to authorize cities to enter into contracts to apportion between them the revenue derived from any sale or use tax imposed by them that is collected for them by the State. Before the contract becomes operative, it shall be authorized by a majority of those voting on the question in each jurisdiction at a general or direct primary election;”
WHEREAS, cities must contract with the State Board of Equalization to perform all functions incident to the administration or operation of sales tax pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code section 7202. The Legislature authorized, and still authorizes, cities to apportion revenue (i.e., as defined in Government Code section 55702 - Bradley Burns Unform Sales and Use Tax) from tangible personal property retail sales pursuant to Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 14., Item Page 5, Packet Page 116 ATTACHMENT 13
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 115, Packet Page 118 2 Government Code section 55704. The contract, and resolutions approving the contract, are to be transmitted to the State Board of Equalization to allocate the funds pursuant to Government Code section 55706;
WHEREAS, a revenue sharing contract between the City of Monterey and the City of Pacific Grove was not authorized by a majority vote of the electorate in either city, or transmitted to the State Board of Equalization for allocation; WHEREAS, in 1998, the California Constitution was amended to allow revenue sharing contracts approved by two-thirds vote of each affected jurisdiction’s governing body without having to go to a vote of the electorate;
WHEREAS, the parcel for 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey is sited almost entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits. The City of Pacific Grove is not providing any municipal services to 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey;
WHEREAS, Carl’s Jr. is the restaurant currently operating at 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey, and it has a State of California Seller’s Permit for the Monterey location;
WHEREAS, Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Taxes are allocated “to the place where the sale is deemed to take place….” For Carl’s Jr., the “principal negotiations are carried on” and “the order is taken” in the City of Monterey. The restaurant is located entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits. The City of Monterey is therefore the place of business for purposes of Bradley-Burnes Uniform Local Sales and Use Taxes pursuant to 18 California Code of Regulation section 1802;
WHEREAS, because the restaurant operating at 902 Lighthouse Avenue is entirely within the City of Monterey’s city limits, the factual basis supporting the prior revenue sharing joint resolutions with the City of Pacific Grove no longer exists, and therefore revenue sharing with Pacific Grove is neither equitable nor legally supportable; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 14., Item Page 6, Packet Page 117 ATTACHMENT 13
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 116, Packet Page 119 3 2. The City Council hereby repeals Resolutions 82-4 and 82-5 with an effective date of June 30, 2022.

3. Effective July 1, 2022, sales tax, business license tax, and utility user’s taxes generated from APN 001014004000 will not to be shared with the City of Pacific Grove, and shall be collected pursuant to Monterey City Code sections 19-4 et seq. [business license tax], Section 35-40 et seq. [Public Utilities Use Tax], Section 35-3 et seq. [sales and use tax], as those sections may be amended or superseded.

4. The City Clerk is directed to send this Resolution to the City of Pacific Grove, and to the property owner and to the business owner for 902 Lighthouse Avenue, Monterey, within three days of its passage.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 14., Item Page 7, Packet Page 118 ATTACHMENT 13
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 117, Packet Page 120 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 353 Camino El Estero; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties:

Monica Lal (Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce); Under Negotiation:

Terms and Conditions for Lease Amendment (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint agency negotiators for a conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to discuss and provide confidential direction regarding a lease amendment with the Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce.

VALUE DRIVER:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

City Council approval is required for real estate transactions. Closed session confidential review of real estate matters is allowed.

The Surplus Land Act does not apply since there is no disposition as defined under the Act.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications related to the recommendation to appoint agency negotiators.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 15.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 15., Item Page 1, Packet Page 119 ATTACHMENT 14
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 118, Packet Page 121 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to appoint negotiators or appoint different negotiators. This is not recommended by staff. It is appropriate that the Council appoint agency negotiators and authorize a confidential discussion regarding the proposed lease amendment with the Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce.

DISCUSSION:

The Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce leases the building located at 353 Camino El Estero under a lease agreement that commenced in February 2020 and is scheduled to expire in February 2025. The tenant has requested a change to the terms of the lease. City Council approval is required for this type of lease transaction. Closed session discussions are allowed and appropriate for confidential direction in real estate matters of this type.

JA/ad
e: Monica Lal, Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 15., Item Page 2, Packet Page 120 ATTACHMENT 14
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 119, Packet Page 122 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: Approximately 256 Square Feet Located in the Wharf II Warehouse; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Robbie Torrise (Robbie’s Ocean Fresh Seafood, Inc.); Under Negotiation: Terms and Conditions for Lease Amendment (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint agency negotiators for a conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to discuss and provide confidential direction regarding expansion of the leased premises with Robbie’s Ocean Fresh Seafood.

VALUE DRIVER:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

City Council approval is required for real estate transactions. Closed session confidential review of real estate matters is allowed.

The Surplus Land Act does not apply to Tidelands property.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications related to the recommendation to appoint agency negotiators.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 16., Item Page 1, Packet Page 121 ATTACHMENT 15
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 120, Packet Page 123 this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

DISCUSSION:

Robbie’s Ocean Fresh Seafood (“Robbie’s”), owned by Mr. Robbie Torrise, leases approximately 500 square feet in the Municipal Wharf No. 2 warehouse. Mr. Torrise’s business model includes purchasing fresh and frozen seafood in addition to local fish directly from boats and packaging it for wholesale and retail sales. Mr. Torrise is interested in leasing an additional space that is approximately 256 square feet (Attachment 1). He has been occupying this space under a short-term license agreement.

City Council approval is required for this type of lease transaction. Closed session discussions are allowed and appropriate for confidential direction in real estate matters of this type.

JA/ad
Attachments: 1. Municipal Wharf No. 2 Warehouse
e: Robbie Torrise, Robbie’s Ocean Fresh Seafood
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 16., Item Page 2, Packet Page 122 ATTACHMENT 15
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 121, Packet Page 124 Additional
Space
Restrooms
Electrical
Room
Wharf II Warehouse
(Not to scale)
Robbie's Ocean
Fresh Seafood, Inc.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 16., Item Page 3, Packet Page 123 ATTACHMENT 15
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 122, Packet Page 125 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 700 Cannery Row; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Mike Zimmerman (Cannery Row Company); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Lease Extension (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint agency negotiators for a conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to discuss and provide confidential direction regarding an extension of the lease agreement with the Cannery Row Company.

VALUE DRIVERS:

The action to appoint negotiators supports the Fiscal Stewardship Value Driver to “Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.”
POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

City Council approval is required for real estate transactions. Closed session confidential review of real estate matters is allowed.

The Surplus Land Act does not apply to Tidelands property.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications related to the recommendation to appoint agency negotiators.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 17., Item Page 1, Packet Page 124 ATTACHMENT 16
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 123, Packet Page 126 this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to appoint negotiators or appoint different negotiators. This is not recommended by staff. It is appropriate that the Council appoint agency negotiators and authorize a confidential discussion regarding an extension of the lease agreement with a Cannery Row Company representative.

DISCUSSION:

The current ground lease for a portion of the property located at 700 Cannery Row was effective January 1, 1998 and is scheduled to expire on September 30, 2025. As reflected in the photo below, the Cannery Row Company leases tidelands property north of the tidelands boundary.

The Cannery Row Company has been requesting a lease extension for several years.

However, vacant space, leases on a month-to-month status, and leases with expiration dates within the next six to 12 months have been the City’s priority. With lease terms agreed to with two Fisherman’s Wharf tenants (Harbor House and Chris’s Fishing and Whale Watching), a new tenant at 401 Camino El Estero (Big Sur Adventures); new lease agreements executed with Monterey Sportfishing, Monterey Fish Company (pump house), and Monterey Waves (Monterey Tennis Center), and marketing efforts for 30 Fisherman’s Wharf underway, staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding price and terms for the requested lease extension.

Closed session discussions are allowed and appropriate for confidential direction in real estate matters of this type.

JA/ad
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 17., Item Page 2, Packet Page 125 ATTACHMENT 16
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 124, Packet Page 127 e: Mike Zimmerman, Cannery Row Company
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 17., Item Page 3, Packet Page 126 ATTACHMENT 16
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 125, Packet Page 128 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 720 Cannery Row; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Mike Zimmerman (Cannery Row Company); Under Negotiation: Terms and Conditions for Lease Extension (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint agency negotiators for a conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to discuss and provide confidential direction regarding an extension of the lease agreement with the Cannery Row Company.

VALUE DRIVERS:

City Council approval is required for real estate transactions. Closed session confidential review of real estate matters is allowed.

The Surplus Land Act does not apply to Tidelands property.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications related to the recommendation to appoint agency negotiators.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 18., Item Page 1, Packet Page 127 ATTACHMENT 17
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 126, Packet Page 129 this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to appoint negotiators or appoint different negotiators. This is not recommended by staff. It is appropriate that the Council appoint agency negotiators and authorize a confidential discussion regarding an extension of the lease agreement with a Cannery Row Company representative.

DISCUSSION:

The current ground lease for a portion of the property located at 720 Cannery Row was effective January 1, 1998 and is scheduled to expire on September 30, 2025. As reflected in the photo below, the Cannery Row Company leases tidelands property north of the tidelands boundary.

The property is subleased to Bubba Gump Shrimp Company.

The Cannery Row Company has been requesting a lease extension for several years.

However, vacant space, leases on a month-to-month status and leases with expiration dates within the next 6-12 months have been the City’s priority. With lease terms agreed to with two Fisherman’s Wharf tenants (Harbor House and Chris’s Fishing and Whale Watching), a new tenant at 401 Camino El Estero (Big Sur Adventures); new lease agreements executed with Monterey Sportfishing, Monterey Fish Company (pump house), and Monterey Waves (Monterey Tennis Center), and marketing efforts for 30 Fisherman’s Wharf underway, staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding the requested lease extension. Closed session discussions are allowed and appropriate for confidential direction in real estate matters of this type.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 18., Item Page 2, Packet Page 128 ATTACHMENT 17
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 127, Packet Page 130 JA/ad
e: Mike Zimmerman, Cannery Row Company
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 18., Item Page 3, Packet Page 129 ATTACHMENT 17
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 128, Packet Page 131 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Receive Mayor’s Recommendation and Appoint Justin Ono to the Parks and Recreation Committee (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 19, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Council receive a recommendation from Mayor Roberson and appoint Justin Ono to the Parks and Recreation Committee as outlined in the “Discussion” section of this report.

VALUE DRIVER:

Foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This recommendation conforms to Monterey City Code and the California Maddy Act.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications with this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council could take no action or could make an alternate appointment.

Date: 6/21/2022
Item No.: 19.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 1, Packet Page 130 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 129, Packet Page 132 DISCUSSION:

Background
A series of ongoing vacancies, newly vacated seats, and expiring terms on Monterey’s boards, commissions, and committees have been duly posted and published by the City Clerk’s Office pursuant to Council’s appointments policy, seeking qualified applications to fill seats for:
 Appeals Hearing Board – vacancy left by former alternate Dr. Nick Yaqub, who resigned April 25, 2022
 Board of Library Trustees – two terms set to expire on June 30, 2022 (one application was received and the applicant was reappointed on June 7, 2022; one seat remains)  Disabled Access Appeals Board – multiple long-term vacant seats (one application was received and the applicant was appointed on June 7, 2022; two seats remain vacant)  Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee – multiple long-term vacant alternate seats
 Parks and Recreation Commission – vacancy left by former member Kathleen Panetta, who resigned March 18, 2022
Recommendation
Mayor Roberson reviewed the applications seen in this packet and interviewed applicants in accordance with Council policy, and gave appropriate attention and time to the process that resulted in the following recommendation. Mayor Roberson is grateful that so many qualified Monterey residents took time to apply. He recommends that the Council appoint the following:

Parks and Recreation Commission
Justin Ono - to fill a vacated term expiring June 30, 2024 Eligibility: The City Clerk confirmed using the GIS assessment database that the residential addresses of all seven applicants fall within City of Monterey boundaries.

Next Steps
Seats remain available on the Appeals Hearing Board, Disabled Access Appeals Board, Board of Library Trustees, and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee. Applications will be accepted on an ongoing basis until these positions are filled.

Monterey residents are encouraged to learn more and apply for these volunteer positions.

Monterey residents interested in receiving notice of board and commission vacancies are encouraged to subscribe to the City’s “Boards and Commissions Interest List.” CBK
Attachments: 1. Grid of Applicants

2. Applications Received
e: Applicants
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 2, Packet Page 131 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 130, Packet Page 133 Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 3, Packet Page 132 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 131, Packet Page 134 Board and Commission Vacancies and Applicants
ATTACHMENT 1
Available Seats: Applicants:

Parks and Recreation Commission
Vacancy: One member Due Apr. 25, 2022 End-of-Day
Barber, Kim rec'd 4/8/22
Cavanagh, Sharon rec'd 4/25/22
Ebell, Eric rec'd 4/4/22
Hearin, Phillip rec'd 4/21/22
Mera, John rec'd 4/3/22
Naylor, Brandon rec'd 4/3/22
Ono, Justin rec'd 3/31/22
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 4, Packet Page 133 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 132, Packet Page 135 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 5, Packet Page 134 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 133, Packet Page 136 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 6, Packet Page 135 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 134, Packet Page 137 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 7, Packet Page 136 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 135, Packet Page 138 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 8, Packet Page 137 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 136, Packet Page 139 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 9, Packet Page 138 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 137, Packet Page 140 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 10, Packet Page 139 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 138, Packet Page 141 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 11, Packet Page 140 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 139, Packet Page 142 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 12, Packet Page 141 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 140, Packet Page 143 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 13, Packet Page 142 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 141, Packet Page 144 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 14, Packet Page 143 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 142, Packet Page 145 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 15, Packet Page 144 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 143, Packet Page 146 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 16, Packet Page 145 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 144, Packet Page 147 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 17, Packet Page 146 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 145, Packet Page 148 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 18, Packet Page 147 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 146, Packet Page 149 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 19, Packet Page 148 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 147, Packet Page 150 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 20, Packet Page 149 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 148, Packet Page 151 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 21, Packet Page 150 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 149, Packet Page 152 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 22, Packet Page 151 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 150, Packet Page 153 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 23, Packet Page 152 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 151, Packet Page 154 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 24, Packet Page 153 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 152, Packet Page 155 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 25, Packet Page 154 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 153, Packet Page 156 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 26, Packet Page 155 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 154, Packet Page 157 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 27, Packet Page 156 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 155, Packet Page 158 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 28, Packet Page 157 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 156, Packet Page 159 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 29, Packet Page 158 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 157, Packet Page 160 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 30, Packet Page 159 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 158, Packet Page 161 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 31, Packet Page 160 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 159, Packet Page 162 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 32, Packet Page 161 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 160, Packet Page 163 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 33, Packet Page 162 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 161, Packet Page 164 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 34, Packet Page 163 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 162, Packet Page 165 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 35, Packet Page 164 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 163, Packet Page 166 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 36, Packet Page 165 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 164, Packet Page 167 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 37, Packet Page 166 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 165, Packet Page 168 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 38, Packet Page 167 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 166, Packet Page 169 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 39, Packet Page 168 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 167, Packet Page 170 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 40, Packet Page 169 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 168, Packet Page 171 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 41, Packet Page 170 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 169, Packet Page 172 Attachment 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/21/2022, Item No. 19., Item Page 42, Packet Page 171 ATTACHMENT 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 1., Item Page 170, Packet Page 173 Council
Agenda Report
№10/13
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
Prepared By: Brianna Kennedy, Intern, City Manager’s Office SUBJECT: Ratify City Council Vote of June 21, 2022 Approving 1st Reading - Amend Chapter 19 of the Monterey City Code (Licenses, Fees, and Charges) to Prohibit the Sale of all Flavored Tobacco Products (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council ratify the City Council vote of June 21, 2022 to introduce by title only, waive full reading, and pass a first reading of an ordinance to amend Chapter 19 of the Monterey City Code, Article 5 related to Tobacco Retail Licensing to prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco and marijuana products, including menthol tobacco products.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Protect and preserve our natural environment by addressing climate change through ecologically responsible and pragmatic solutions.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The proposed Ordinance will significantly reduce the appeal, availability, and usage of nicotine and e-cigarette products by youth and young adults, who are at increased risk of developing nicotine addiction as adults.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

If approved, enforcement of the code amendment changes would be the responsibility of the City’s Code Enforcement Program. Citations would provide minimal cost recovery for code enforcement activities. Furthermore, the City may be impacted by the loss of tax revenue derived from these products once banned.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 1, Packet Page 174 on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council may choose to allow exceptions, such as continuing to allow menthol or hookah products, or may not adopt this ordinance; however, this will diminish the City’s ability to protect youth from harmful addictive substances.

DISCUSSION:

City staff is proposing a ban on the sale of all disposable e-cigarette systems and all flavored tobacco and e-cigarette products, including flavored cannabis vapes and menthol cigarettes.

This measure will take necessary steps to protect middle and high school students in the City from harmful addictive substances and protect Monterey Bay coastlines from hazardous materials.

Popularity of Flavored Tobacco Among Youth
Due to concerns for increased cigarette use by youth in the 1990s and early 2000s, the U.S.

Food and Drug Administration banned the sale of flavored cigarettes nationally in 2009. Studies conducted in the years after this decision found that youth (12-17 years of age) smoking menthol cigarettes increased but overall cigarette usage decreased by 43% from 2009 to 2017, indicating that the ban had success in reducing youth smoking.

Shortly after, the introduction of e-cigarettes and flavored vape products disrupted progress towards minimizing tobacco use among youth, with a 900% increase in e-cigarette use among U.S. middle and high school students between 2011 and 2015. Many students report that they obtain these products from friends or family and partake in vaping as a social activity with peers.

Observers have reported a noticeable difference in the behavior of classmates who use ecigarette products, including low attention span, moodiness, and reduced impulse control.

Statistics of youth use of e-cigarette and vape products include:
 In 2019, more than 5.2 million young people in the United States reported current vape use, including 27.5% of high school students and 10.5% of middle school students  Current use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products increased by 900% among U.S. middle and high school students between 2011 and 2015
 The legal age to purchase vape products in California is 21, yet 24% of high school students have reported trying e-cigarette products in California from 2019-2020 Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 2, Packet Page 175  As of 2020, e-cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco product among high school students across all demographics
Environmental Concerns
In addition to the health impacts of e-cigarettes, many variations of these products are singleuse, disposable systems which contribute to the local, national, and international plastic pollution problem. E-cigarette waste is particularly hazardous for the environment due to the biochemical waste from the nicotine cartridge and the electronic waste from the battery in addition to the single-use plastic waste from the device casing and pods. Nicotine salts, heavy metals, lead, mercury, and flammable lithium-ion batteries have all been shown to have adverse impacts on waterways, soil, and wildlife. In addition, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) released a report on the severity and frequency of e-cigarette battery explosions, describing the consequences for consumers and the environment. The City of Monterey has shown its dedication to protecting the environment by enacting plastic bag and plastic straw bans, food scrap collection programs, and green energy – including Monterey Conference Center’s LEED Platinum certification.

Ban on Flavored Tobacco and Vape Products
There has already been a large public effort to make flavored tobacco and vape products less accessible to youth. In 2020, the California state legislature passed its own ban targeting flavors in e-cigarettes and other tobacco products, awaiting a referendum vote in November 2022 for implementation, and a total of 111 localities have passed their own measures to restrict flavored tobacco products, including neighboring Santa Cruz County and the City of Pacific Grove.

Monterey County is also taking steps to implement similar restrictions in unincorporated areas.

The Board of Supervisors agreed to ban flavored tobacco and single-use disposable e-cigarette products without exemptions and the ordinance passed on March 15, 2022.

Local ordinances regulating flavored tobacco and vape products is summarized below:
 The City of Pacific Grove enacted a ban in January of 2020 on the sale of all flavored tobacco products without exemptions for menthol flavoring or adult-only establishments.  The County of Monterey began discussions of a flavored tobacco and e-cigarette ban in early 2020. Leading up to the final vote on March 15, 2022, the Monterey County Board of Supervisors and Monterey County Health Department finalized language for a ban on all flavored tobacco products without an exemption for menthol or modified risk products, as well as a ban on single-use disposable e-cigarettes. The new ordinance applies to all tobacco retailers of unincorporated areas in Monterey County and will be enforced by the Monterey County Health Department and the Monterey County Sheriff’s office. It went into effect 30 days after being passed.
 The City of Santa Cruz enacted a ban in June of 2019 on the sale of all flavored tobacco products, including menthol, mint, and wintergreen flavors.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 3, Packet Page 176  The City of Capitola enacted a ban in January of 2020 on the sale of all flavored tobacco products including a ban on new retailers within 1000 feet of a school and/or public library.

The proposed ordinance would also update the definition of “flavor” to include any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, mint, wintergreen, herb, spice, or menthol or any concept flavor that imparts a taste or aroma that is distinguishable from tobacco flavor. The ordinance would also expand the definition of “tobacco product” to include cigarettes; e-cigarettes or vapes; cigars; cigarillos; smokeless tobacco including chew, dip, snuff and snus; and heated tobacco products.

Enforcement
In 2016, the City signed an agreement with the County of Monterey for Tobacco Retail License Administrative Services, which included “administrative and enforcement services specific under the [City of Monterey’s Ordinance 3508], including but not limited to: receiving, reviewing, and processing the tobacco retail application and the information contained therein; issuing the license; administering the license program, retailer education, retailer inspection and compliance checks; documenting violations; issuing and collecting penalties; and hearing any appeals”. However, due to the potential for changes to the enforcement protocols of the Monterey County Tobacco Retail License program in July of 2022, the City of Monterey seeks a joint enforcement process with Monterey County Health Department. The Environmental Health division of the Monterey County Health Department will continue to inspect and correct minor violations for tobacco retailers, while serious violations involving retailing to minors or without a valid permit could be referred to the City’s Code Enforcement Program and Monterey Police Department for citation or additional enforcement action.

Veto Referendum on Senate Bill 793 (SB 793)
In August of 2020, Governor Newsom of California signed into law Senate Bill 793, making California the second state after Massachusetts to implement a ban on flavored tobacco products. The bill included menthol and mint in its flavor definition, but allowed exemptions for premium cigars, pipe tobacco and hookah tobacco to continue to be sold and consumed on or off premises, as long as there are no electronic elements. However, just days after it was passed, the tobacco industry backed a veto referendum to overturn SB 793, which was approved by the Attorney General. This put the implementation of SB 793 on hold until November of 2022, when voters will decide whether to uphold the bill. As of December 31, 2021, the campaign to overturn the bill had received $21.16 million, with the majority of contributions coming directly from the tobacco industry - $10.33 million from R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and $9.83 million from Philip Morris USA.

A similar referendum was raised in the City of San Francisco when R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and JUUL gathered enough signatures to pause the implementation of a flavor ban passed by the city council in 2017, the first comprehensive flavor ban in the United States which targeted high value products to the tobacco industry, such as menthol cigarettes and flavored vaping liquids. However, 68% of San Francisco voters decided to uphold the law and it went into effect January of 2019.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 4, Packet Page 177 Many other municipalities in California have begun to implement their own ordinances in the event that the November 2022 election referendum is successful. Should the referendum fail, the City’s ordinance will only be valid where it is more restrictive than state law.

Community Engagement
In preparing to bring this ordinance to Council, staff announced two virtual town hall meetings to the community. Staff increased awareness on this issue through city newsletters, a press release published on the city website and picked up by the Monterey Herald, and social media posts. Postcards were also mailed to all registered tobacco retailers in the City of Monterey, inviting them to provide their feedback. The town hall meetings were held on Monday, April 25, 2022 in the evening and Tuesday, April 26, 2022 during the day. Stakeholders were informed of the proposed changes to the City Code, provided supporting research, and given an opportunity to share comments or ask questions, as well as provided information on submitting feedback in writing via the Have Your Say Monterey website. Over a dozen community members participated in the two community Town Hall Meetings, where they were able to provide feedback on the proposed ordinance. Four residents expressed support for an ordinance and one business owner expressed opposition. At least two local tobacco retailers were present during the virtual meetings. Later that week, the recordings of both town hall meetings were added to the Have Your Say Monterey flavored tobacco webpage for the public to view.

Outside of the town hall meetings, staff received emails from gas station representatives in opposition of the proposed ordinance and the correspondence was posted on Have Your Say Monterey. In addition, several community members have shared additional feedback in the Community Comments section of the flavored tobacco webpage. The Have Your Say Monterey flavored tobacco page will remain available for the public to view and provide comments until Council concludes deliberation on this issue, at which time it will be archived for public record.

Summary of Staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending that Council adopt an ordinance implementing the changes to Article 5 of Chapter 19 of the Monterey City Code.

Attachments 1. Ordinance

e: All Business Associations
All Neighborhood Associations
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 5, Packet Page 178 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№07/19
AMEND CHAPTER 19, ARTICLE 5 OF THE MONTEREY CITY CODE (TOBACCO RETAILER

LICENSE) TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF ALL FLAVORED TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND

SINGLE USE ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, state law prohibits the sale or furnishing of cigarettes, tobacco products, and smoking paraphernalia to minors, as well as the purchase, receipt, or possession of tobacco products by minors (Cal. Pen. Code § 308);
WHEREAS, state law explicitly permits cities and counties to enact local tobacco retail permitting ordinances and allows for the suspension or revocation of a local permit for a violation of any state tobacco control law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22971.3); WHEREAS, in 2014 the Monterey City Council enacted Monterey City Code section 19- 105 et seq. to establish a permitting system for tobacco retailers to ensure that retailers comply with tobacco control laws and business standards of the City to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City. Prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products also furthers these goals and objectives;
WHEREAS, prohibiting tobacco retailers from selling flavored tobacco products will not unduly burden legitimate business activities of retailers who sell or distribute cigarettes or other tobacco products to adults. It will, however, allow the City to regulate the operation of lawful business to discourage violations of local laws by selling flavored tobacco products; WHEREAS, the City has a substantial interest in promoting compliance with federal, state, and local laws intended to regulate flavored tobacco product sales and use; in discouraging the illegal purchase of flavored tobacco products by minors; in promoting compliance with laws prohibiting sales of e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco products to minors; and finally, and most importantly, in protecting children from being lured into illegal activity through the misconduct of adults;
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 793, approved by the Governor in August 2020, prohibits a tobacco retailer from selling flavored tobacco products. A referendum challenging this law qualified for the November 8, 2022 ballot. Therefore, the new state law is suspended until the outcome of the vote on the referendum. If the referendum is not successful, Health & Safety Code section 104559.5(g) provides that the state law does not preempt or otherwise prohibit the adoption of local standards that impose greater restrictions on the access to tobacco products than the restrictions imposed by the state. To the extent that there is an inconsistency between the state law and local standards, the greater restriction on the access to tobacco products in the local standard shall prevail;
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 6, Packet Page 179 2 WHEREAS, in a ruling issued on March 18, 2022, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al (2022 WL 816603) held that the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, codified at 21 USC §387 et seq., did not preempt a city from banning the sale of some or all tobacco products; WHEREAS, more than 5.2 million young people in the United States reported vape use in 2019, including 27.5% of high school students and 10.5% of middle school students (CDC); WHEREAS, 24% of high school students have reported trying vape products in California from 2019-2020 (California Student Tobacco Survey); WHEREAS, 27.3% of high school students in the Monterey County area have tried or currently use vape products as of 2020 (California Student Tobacco Survey); WHEREAS, disposable e-cigarette use, which are designed for one time-use, has increased 1000% among high school students in the United States between 2019 and 2020 (FDA);
WHEREAS, e-cigarette waste introduces plastic, nicotine salts, heavy metals, lead, mercury, and flammable lithium-ion batteries into waterways, soil, and to wildlife (CDC); WHEREAS, a garbology study performed in 12 San Francisco high schools from 2018 to 2019 to investigate e-cigarette, combustible cigarette, and cannabis product waste revealed that 99% of identifiable e-cigarette waste was from flavored pods other than tobacco flavor and 42% of all identifiable combustible cigarette waste was menthol flavored. In the same study, menthol flavored waste accounted for 60% in low-income schools, 38% in middle-income schools, and 28% in high-income schools of all identifiable combustible cigarette waste (CDC); WHEREAS, adolescents obtain e-cigarettes from a variety of sources, including purchasing from a store or online (31%), buying from another person (16%), and giving a person of legal age money to purchase for them (15%) (AJHP Pepper et al); WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

SECTION 2: The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 7, Packet Page 180 SECTION 3. Monterey City Code, Article 5, Chapter 19, Section 19-105, subsection (c) is hereby amended to read as follows:
“c. This article is adopted to: (1) ensure compliance with business standards and practices of the City; (2) to encourage responsible retailing of tobacco; (3) to target behaviors contributing to the youth smoking epidemic by implementing restrictions pertaining to the sale of flavored tobacco and e-cigarette products, including disposable e-cigarettes, flavored cannabis, and menthol cigarettes; (3) to limit the sale of tobacco products to those with the taste or aroma of tobacco, or no taste or aroma at all; and (4) to discourage violations of tobacco-related laws, but not to expand or reduce the degree to which the acts regulated by federal or state law are criminally proscribed or otherwise regulated.” SECTION 4: Monterey City Code, Chapter 19, Article 5, Section 19-106 is hereby relettered sequentially by inserting the following new definitions in alphabetical order into the existing text:
“a. “Characterizing flavor” means a taste or aroma, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted either prior to or during consumption of a tobacco product or any byproduct produced by the tobacco product, including but not limited to tastes or aromas related to menthol, mint, wintergreen, fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic beverage, herb, or spice. Characterizing flavor includes flavor in any form, mixed with or otherwise added to any tobacco product or nicotine delivery device, including electronic smoking devices.
c. “Electronic smoking device” means:
(1) Any electronic device or delivery system that can be used to deliver an inhaled dose of nicotine, flavorings, chemicals, or other substances in aerosolized or vaporized form for human consumption, including but not limited to an electronic cigarette, cigar, pipe, vape pen, or hookah.
(2) Any component, part, or accessory of such a device or delivery system that is used during its operation.
(3) Any flavored or unflavored liquid or substance, whether sold separately or sold in combination with any such device or delivery system that could be used to deliver nicotine or other substances in aerosolized or vaporized form. (4) Any product for use in such an electronic device or delivery system whether or not it contains nicotine or tobacco or is derived from nicotine or tobacco. d. “E-Liquid” means the liquid that is converted into an aerosol by an e-cigarette or vaping product. It is typically a mixture of water, food grade flavoring, and a choice of nicotine levels, cannabis (THC, CBD), propylene glycol (PG) or vegetable glycerin (VG). e. “Flavored tobacco product” means any tobacco product, as defined in this Article, which imparts a characterizing flavor.
j. “Single-use electronic cigarette product” means an electronic smoking device that is not refillable or rechargeable and is typically discarded once its contents have been used.

SECTION 5: Monterey City Code, Chapter 19, Section 19-106 (l) is hereby amended to Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 8, Packet Page 181 4 read as follows:
“l. “Tobacco product” means:
(1) Any substance containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine, whether natural or synthetic, that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, pipe tobacco, hookah tobacco, smokeless tobacco (e.g., snuff, snus, chewing tobacco, dipping tobacco) bidis, heated tobacco, or any other preparation of tobacco; or (2) Any electronic smoking device that delivers nicotine or other substances, whether natural or synthetic, to the person inhaling from the device, including but not limited to an electronic cigarette, electronic cigar, electronic pipe, electronic hookah, or vaping device.
(3) Any product or formulation of matter containing biologically active amounts of nicotine that is manufactured, sold, offered for sale, or otherwise distributed with the expectation that the product or matter will be introduced into the human body, (4) “Tobacco product” does not include drugs, devices, or combination products authorized for sale by the United States Food and Drug Administration, as those terms are defined in the Federal Drug and Cosmetic Act, as may be amended. ” SECTION 6: Monterey City Code, Chapter 19, Section 19-113 through 19-120 are hereby renumbered as Section 19-114 through 19-121.

SECTION 7: Monterey City Code, Chapter 19, Section 19-113 is hereby added to read as follows:
“19-113. Violations.
a. It shall be a violation of this Article for a tobacco retailer, or its agents or employees, to violate any federal state or local tobacco law or regulation, including any provision of this Article.
b. Causing, permitting, aiding, abetting, or concealing a violation of any provision of this Article shall constitute a violation.
c. Failure to prominently display the Tobacco Retail License in a publicly visible location at the licensed premises shall constitute a violation.
d. The failure of the tobacco retailer, or its agents or employees, to allow any peace officer, or other authorized government official to conduct unscheduled inspections of the premises of the business for the purpose of ensuring compliance with any federal, state, or local tobacco law or regulations, including any provision of this Article, at any time the business is open for business shall constitute a violation. e. After 180 days of the effective date of this ordinance, it shall be a violation of this Article for a tobacco retailer, or its agents or employees to sell, or offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, any flavored tobacco product intended to impart, or imparting a characterizing flavor in any form, to any tobacco product. f. After 180 days of the effective date of this ordinance, it shall be a violation of this Article for a tobacco retailer, or its agents or employees, to sell, or offer for sale, or possess with the intent to sell or offer for sale, any Single Use Electronic Cigarette product.
g. A tobacco retailer’s possession of four or more flavored tobacco products creates a rebuttable presumption the retailer possesses such flavored tobacco products with intent to sell or offer for sale.
h. The following actions of a tobacco retailer, its employees or agents, creates a Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 9, Packet Page 182 rebuttable presumption that a tobacco product is flavored:
(1) public statements or claims that the tobacco product imparts a characterizing flavor; (2) text and/or images on the product’s labeling or packaging to explicitly or implicitly indicate the tobacco product imparts a characterizing flavor; or (3) other actions directed to consumers that would reasonably cause consumers to believe the tobacco or electronic cigarette product imparts a characterizing flavor.

SECTION 8: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 9: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

SECTION 10. Nothing in this Article shall be interpreted or applied so as to create any power or duty in conflict with any federal or state law. If any provision of this Article or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Article or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 2., Item Page 10, Packet Page 183 Council
Agenda Report
№07/19
FROM: Andrea Renny, Interim Public Works Director
Prepared By: Cristie Steffy, Parking Superintendent
SUBJECT: Ratify City Council Vote of June 21, 2022 Adopting Automated License Plate Recognition Policy for Use in Parking Operations (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That Council ratify City council vote of June 21, 2022 approving a policy that governs the use of an Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) technology for the use in parking operations for compliance with Senate Bill 34. The ALPR technology used by the City captures still images.

The agenda posted on June 21, 2022 did not include the correct meeting number to permit those who wished to join the meeting by telephone to participate as indicated on the agenda, therefore, this item has been agendized again to ratify the vote.

VALUE DRIVER:

Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Provide and deploy effective parking facilities, programs, and enforcement tools that support resident, business, and visitor access to various business districts and neighborhoods. State law requires an opportunity for the public to comment on the City’s proposed ALPR policy. (Cal.

Civ. Code section 1798.90.55(a).)
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The City contracts with Turbodata, who subcontracts with VIGILANT. The City Council adopted Resolution 21-073 on July 6, 2021, approving the cost to purchase three ALPR units for $88,521.85. The service contract is valid for five years with a total cost of $186,335.00.

There is the potential for additional expenses that may be incurred in connection with responding to California Public Records Act request, where images might need to be anonymized to protect privacy interests.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 1, Packet Page 184 to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

None at this time as this policy is required for compliance with Senate Bill 34, effective 2016.

DISCUSSION:

ALPR technology was first introduced to the City of Monterey in 2001. The Parking Division has utilized ALPR in parking operations as a key component in parking enforcement.

Staff has worked to prepare a comprehensive ALPR policy to ensure compliance with City data retention standards as well with Senate Bill 34, which requires security procedures and practices to protect information gathered through the use of ALPR technology from unauthorized use, access, modification or disclosure. As a public ALPR operator, the City is required to implement a usage and privacy policy to ensure the City is compliant in the collection, use, maintenance sharing and dissemination of collected information and is consistent with respect for individuals’ privacy, security and civil liberties.

ALPR technology uses infra-red cameras with optical charter recognition to automatically read license plate characters as they pass through the camera’s field of view to enable the rapid identification and location of vehicles. In 2017, the California Supreme Court recognized privacy interests in license plate scan data. The court determined that the public interest served by not disclosing ALPR records clearly outweighed the public interest served by disclosure. However, the court did not determine whether ALPR redacted data could be produced, and the City may need to redact personal information from ALPR records in response to a California Public Record Act request.

The Parking Division uses vehicle-mounted ALPR cameras on enforcement scooters which collect data on public roadways and pubic property as well as fixed-mounted ALPR cameras in automated off-street parking facilities. The collected information is stored for a fixed retention period and may only be accessed by authorized personnel for legitimate purposes.

Staff requests that Council approve a policy that governs the use of an Automated License Plate Recognition technology for the use in parking operations for compliance with Senate Bill 34.

SW/cs
Attachments: 1. Automated License Plate Recognition Policy Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 2, Packet Page 185 ATTACHMENT 1
1 City of Monterey Parking Division
Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Policy

1. POLICY
It is the mission of the Parking Division to administer the parking programs of the City of Monterey with the objective of providing safe, legal and optimal parking to the citizens of and visitors to the City of Monterey. The Parking Division uses Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) technology and supporting software to support this mission while recognizing the established privacy rights of the public.

2. PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to define the City’s appropriate use, maintenance, collection, security and retention of all digital data obtained using Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) technology, and to define the authorized users of the City’s ALPR technology as well as their training requirements and responsibilities under this policy, as required by California Civil Code §1798.90.5 et seq.

The ALPR technology, also known as License Plate Recognition (LPR), allows for the automated detection of license plates. It is used by the Parking Division to convert data associated with vehicle license plates for official Parking Division purposes, including identifying vehicles eligible for tow due to overdue citations, and for electronically “chalking” vehicles to enforce time-limited parking spaces. It may also be used to identify stolen or wanted vehicles and be shared with the Monterey Police Department for legitimate law enforcement purposes.

In connection with its use of ALPR technology, the City recognizes established privacy rights of the public. All data images and data gathered by the ALPR are for the official use of the Parking Division. The City will only use ALPR technology to collect license plate data within public view.

The City will not use ALPR technology for the sole purpose of monitoring individual activities that are otherwise protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

3. ADMINISTRATION
All installation and maintenance of ALPR equipment, as well as ALPR data retention and access, shall be managed by the Parking Superintendent as further set forth in Section 4 below.

The Parking Superintendent will assign staff members under their direction to administer the day-to-day operation of the ALPR equipment and data.

4. ALPR ADMINISTRATOR & AUTHORIZED USERS
The Parking Superintendent shall be responsible for developing and implementing guidelines and procedures in compliance with the requirements of this policy and of Civil Code § 1798.90.5 et seq., including but not limited to the following:

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 3, Packet Page 186 ATTACHMENT 1
2 (a) A list of the job titles or other designation of the staff members and 3rd party independent contractors who are authorized to use or access the ALPR system or collect ALPR information.
(b) Training procedures in accordance with Section 9 herein, which training shall be required for all ALPR authorized users
(c) An ALPR system monitoring protocol that complies with Civil Code § 1798.90.52 to ensure the security of the ALPR information and protection of personal information. (d) Procedures for operators to maintain records of all attempts (whether authorized or unauthorized) to access the ALPR system in accordance with Section 7 herein. (e) Reasonable measures to ensure the accuracy of ALPR information and correct data errors, which measures shall be imposed on the City’s 3rd party ALPR contractor. (f) This policy and its related guidelines and procedures shall be conspicuously posted on the Parking Division’s website.

5. OPERATION OF AN ALPR
Use of an ALPR is restricted to the purposes set forth in this section. Parking Division members shall not use or allow others to use the equipment or database records for any unauthorized purpose (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53). (a) An ALPR shall only be used for official Parking Division business, except as provided in Section 8 herein regarding sharing of data with the Monterey Police Department for legitimate law enforcement purposes.
(b) An ALPR may be used in conjunction with any routine Parking Division operation, including parking enforcement activities.
(c) No member of the Parking Division shall operate ALPR equipment or access ALPR data without first being designated by the Parking Superintendent and completing department-approved training.
(d) For scofflaw vehicles, the enforcement officer shall verify registration information and past due citation status prior to immobilization or impound of vehicles based solely on an ALPR alert.

6. DATA COLLECTION AND RETENTION
Information collected by the ALPR system and the Parking Division shall be limited to the following:
(a) Digital images of license plates
(b) License plate numbers
(c) License plate states
(d) Associated metadata such as date, time and geographic coordinates associated with the digital image captured by the ALPR system.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 4, Packet Page 187 ATTACHMENT 1
3 All nonevidentiary ALPR data shall be downloaded to the server and stored for 90 days.

Evidentiary data shall be retained in accordance with the City’s established Records Retention/Disposition Schedule. Thereafter, ALPR data will be entirely purged from all active and backup systems. Any ALPR data shared with law enforcement that becomes related to evidence in a criminal or civil action, or data that is subject to a discovery request or other lawful action, will be downloaded from the server onto portable media and retained by the Monterey Police Department in accordance with the City’s Records Retention/Disposition Schedule.

7. ACCOUNTABILITY AND SECURITY
All ALPR data will be closely safeguarded and protected by both procedural and technological means. The Parking Division and its 3rd party independent contractors authorized to use or access the ALPR system or collect ALPR information will observe the following safeguards regarding access to and use of stored data:
(a) All ALPR data accessed via the mobile workstation and in storage shall be accessible only through a login/password-protected system capable of documenting all access of information by name, date and time.
(b) All network equipment and servers containing sensitive data are maintained in a secured location and accessed only by authorized personnel
(c) ALPR system shall maintain a log of successful and unsuccessful logon attempts, with such logs monitored by department Authorized Users
(d) ALPR system mobile workstations and servers shall be updated with latest security patches on a regular basis
(e) ALPR data shall be secured, encrypted and backed up regularly (f) ALPR data shall reside on a firewall protected network (g) ALPR system notifications will be monitored and reviewed with action taken as necessary
(h) ALPR systems audits should be conducted on a regular basis. (i) Data collected by the ALPR systems shall be treated as personal information for purposes of existing state and federal data breach notification laws.

8. RELEASE OF ALPR DATA
The City shall not release, provide, sell, share, or transfer ALPR information, except as set forth in this section.

ALPR data may be shared with the Monterey Police Department (MPD) for legitimate law enforcement purposes; MPD may only release the data to other law enforcement or prosecutorial agencies for official law enforcement purposes, or as otherwise permitted by law.

The release of necessary data to the City’s authorized 3rd party ALPR vendor or to towing services shall not be considered the sale, sharing, or transferring of ALPR information.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 5, Packet Page 188 ATTACHMENT 1
4 Requests for ALPR data by non-law enforcement or non-prosecutorial agencies will be processed as provided by the City of Monterey’s Records Management Policy regarding Public Records Act (Govt. Code §6250 et seq.) requests.

9. TRAINING
Authorized Parking Division employees and 3rd party ALPR vendors shall be trained in the use of ALPR technology. Training shall consist of:
(a) Appropriate use of ALPR technology pursuant to this policy, including but not limited to training regarding the confidential nature and limited uses of ALPR data and the restrictions on sharing ALPRA information.
(b) Technical, administrative and procedural measures to protect the security of ALPR data against unauthorized access or use. This shall include, but not be limited to training on safeguarding password information, access to the ALPR systems, and safeguarding ALPR information.
(c) Functionality of the ALPR equipment.
(d) Practical exercises in the use of ALPR technology.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 3., Item Page 6, Packet Page 189 Council
Agenda Report
№12/12
FROM: Brette Neal, Human Resources Director
SUBJECT: Appoint Contract Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 for Labor Negotiations with the City Manager and City Attorney (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint outside council Che Johnson of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore as the Contract Negotiator with the City Manager and City Attorney.

VALUE DRIVER:

Provide sufficient resources and support to develop, retain, and recruit a high-quality city workforce
POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Effective contract negotiations are in alignment with the City’s Strategic Priority to “Provide fair, competitive, and market-rate compensation and benefits to employees through effective labor negotiations.”
It is within policy and practice for Council to appoint negotiators for contract negotiations.

Additionally, Government Code Section 54957.6 of the Brown Act provides that prior to meeting in closed session with its negotiator, that the local agency must hold an open session in which the agency identifies its designated representative.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Appointment of a contract negotiator entails cost. The rate for outside counsel is $450.00 per hour. The total cost will depend on the number of hours needed to negotiate. Funds are available in the current budget and have been included in the 2022/23 proposed budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 4., Item Page 1, Packet Page 190 matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could decide to appoint different agency negotiators instead of those recommended in this report.

DISCUSSION:

The City Manager is out of contract as his contract expired in August 2021 and the City Attorney’s contract will expire in 2023.

Based on Council guidance, the contract negotiator will be responsible for meeting with the City Manager and City Attorney to discuss wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment, and will report to Council with recommendations and requests for authorization of negotiation parameters based on the results of the meetings.

The City Manager is a public official who serves as the chief executive of the city government.

The City Attorney functions as the city’s legal counsel. Both positions are unrepresented.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 4., Item Page 2, Packet Page 191 Community Services District
Agenda Report
№06/11
FROM: Christine Davi, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Open Public Comment and Receive Ocean View Community Services District Quarterly Report
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Community Services District Board of Directors open public comment and receive a report on the Ocean View Community Services District.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Monterey approved the Ocean View Plaza Project (“Project”) located at 457, 465, 470, 484, 565, and 570 Cannery Row in June 2004. The California Coastal Commission requires that the water supply for the Project be provided for by a public entity (See, Public Resources Code section 30250, which requires adequate public services be available to serve new development). The Coastal Commission determined that a Coastal Development Permit could not be filed without the necessary government approvals from other agencies.

Subsequently, the City of Monterey requested that the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) review the establishment of a Community Services District (CSD) for the project site that would own, operate, and maintain the proposed desalination plant once constructed. This CSD was formed pursuant to Community Services District Law (Government Code section 61000 et seq.,) to own and operate a desalination plant to provide residential and commercial water to the Project.

LAFCO adopted Resolution No. 05-27 on December 27, 2005, approving the formation of this CSD. The Monterey City Council was subsequently appointed as the District Board and must meet quarterly according to requirements of Government Code section 61044.

Date: 6/29/2022
Item No.: 5.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 5., Item Page 1, Packet Page 192 In November 2019, the California Coastal Commission denied requests for coastal development permit extensions. The Coastal Commission voted that there were changed circumstances from its original coastal development permit issued in 2008 related to water supply and coastal hazards/sea level rise.

In January 2020, Ruby Falls Fund, LLC, sued the Coastal Commission over its denial of the permit extension request as described in Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 20CV000165. On November 30, 2021, AquaLegacy Development LLC intervened in that action, which has been stayed pending resolution of the appeals in related litigation in Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 16CV001078 (Court of Appeal Nos. H049517 and H049540), in which the court entered a judgment on March 4, 2021 that AquaLegacy is vested with title to the property.

The City originally approved the vesting tentative map for the project on June 1, 2004. The map approval has been extended by operation of law to June 26, 2022, and may be further tolled. cc: Save Our Waterfront, 781 Terry Street, Monterey, CA 93940 Cannery Row Association
LAFCO of Monterey County – Local Agency Formation Committee, POB 1369, Salinas, CA 93902 New Monterey Neighborhood Association
David Balch, Esq.

Anne Mudge, Esq.

Neill Bower, Esq.

Paul James Beard, Esq.

Stephanie Lai, Esq.

Aaron Gruber, Esq.

Dylan Crosby, Esq.

Bob Faulis
William Coffee, Esq.

David Bowie, Esq.

Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 5., Item Page 2, Packet Page 193 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Karen Larson, Parks and Recreation Director
Andrea Willer, Sports Center Manager
SUBJECT: Receive Presentation on Reinvesting in the Monterey Sports Center: Emerging Trends and the Pending Sports Center Operational Assessment (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive the report. Once the analysis is complete, the results of the Sports Center Operational Assessment will be reported at a future public meeting.

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

No new policy implications are associated with receiving the report.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

No new costs are associated with receiving the report. The cost of the consultant to prepare the Operational Assessment is $53,000. Expenditures and/or cost savings may result from future actions taken by the City Council based on information gained from the Operational Assessment.

In March 1992, with the adoption of Resolution 92-61, the City Council evidenced its intent to recover 75% of the Sports Center’s operating costs. In Fiscal Year 2018, the Sports Center recovered 77% of its operating costs. The Operational Assessment will provide data to assist the City Council in developing the City’s goals regarding the amount of desired cost recovery for Sports Center operations.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 1, Packet Page 194 rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council could choose not to receive the report.

DISCUSSION:

The pandemic took an outsized toll on public health and had a far-reaching impact on all business sectors, including the fitness industry. State mandates, social distancing, remote work, and contactless interactions led to $15 billion in lost revenue for clubs and fitness studios in the U.S. last year. When gyms closed, people were forced to rethink their fitness routine. There was a surge in residential fitness equipment sales as they built in-home gyms. Virtual fitness programs exploded, and outdoor fitness and recreational activities boomed. People formed new habits which has had profound implications on the industry as a whole.

Pre-pandemic, the Sports Center had approximately 8,000 members and annual revenue near $4.5M. Post-pandemic, both membership and revenue are trending at about 50% of prepandemic activity. Staff have stayed engaged with members, increased marketing efforts, and focused on core competencies while also introducing new programs to recruit and retain members.

While the Sports Center’s membership sales, program registration, and revenue are steadily improving, a full operational assessment will identify the strengths, weaknesses, threats, and opportunities that are impacting recruitment and retention of members and program participants.

Since City staff do not have the depth of expertise in this level of analysis, the decision was made to hire a qualified firm to complete the task.

A Request for Proposals was developed and posted through procurenow.gov. Three national firms responded to the request and staff interviewed the top two firms. Sports Facilities Companies (SFC) was selected and awarded the contract. SFC has a strong team including experts in fitness and sports facility management, recreation program development, community engagement, strategic planning, financial analysis, marketing strategy, brand development, and aquatics optimization. SFC has the depth and breadth of expertise needed for the scope of work required.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 2, Packet Page 195 Sports Center Trends and Needs
Staff anticipated a slow rebuild assuming many members would be reluctant to return, or had developed new fitness routines, and therefore made every effort to minimize expenses in the first year of re-opening. To adapt to this new normal, significant operational changes were implemented. The Physical Therapy program was discontinued. Towel service, food service, and baby-sitting service were temporarily suspended. Hours of operation were reduced.

Additionally, only high-demand programs were offered. In the area of group exercise, this included yoga and HIIT (high-intensity interval training) which are trending up, as well as adding technology and leaderboards to the indoor cycling program. Aquatics focused on swim lessons for the highest-risk populations (5 and under) and pivoted to more private lessons than group lessons. Indoor sports also pivoted and offered smaller group clinics as opposed to large-scale leagues.

Outdated equipment was traded in and new Cybex treadmills and Stages bikes were purchased prior to reopening. All equipment was reconfigured to create more space, improve traffic, and elevate the customer experience.

Staff also developed strategic digital and print marketing to advertise the 30th Anniversary promotions on June 1, 2022. The one-day only promotion resulted in 445 memberships (95% of whom were new members) and $24,931 in revenue. Since staff started publicly talking about the challenges we experience, the Sports Center has been experiencing a mini-boom in sales.

April, May, and June revenue is 52% higher than the previous fiscal year.

The operational and programmatic changes have been very successful and resulted in revenue exceeding 147% of even mid-year budget projections. As of the writing of this report, staff expect to exceed revenue projections by approximately $800,000.

Operational Analysis
SFC will lead the operational assessment to help refine the vision, define success, and create a plan that best meets the community’s needs. Throughout the process, the SFC will incorporate real-world, real-time insights and best practices. The assessment and analysis are expected to take 16 weeks to complete.

Phase I: Strategic Planning

Existing Data Review and Market Analysis
This stage develops an understanding of the current fitness, aquatics, and sports spaces. The Project Team will review existing financials, detail of programs, performance/margins, existing marketing action plan/strategies, organizational and compensation structure, and review of existing contracts/agreements. In addition to reviewing Sports Center data, the Project Team will conduct local market research to further understand local opportunities and constraints to include analysis of demographic factors like population and density, income and spending, growth trends, etc. Additionally, the Team will conduct focused market-specific health/wellness, sports and recreation factors such as participation trends, analysis of existing service providers, and a review of local organizations.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 3, Packet Page 196 Facility Visit, Strategic Planning Session and Department Interviews Select members of the Project Team will physically tour the Monterey Sports Center to facilitate strategic meetings with facility leadership and facility staff. The meetings will encompass discussions related to existing financial projections, project goals, and plans for site development and renovation, as well as topics such as the business model, the program plan, design/space considerations, alliances with sports and other user groups, utilization, funding/financing, competition analysis and market share, management and staffing plan, and much more.

The Project team will also work with Sports Center staff to identify existing users and analyze utilization rates from pre-existing usage information. The team will review programming and booking schedules for the facility and activity areas, analysis of foot traffic and capture rates, assessment of fees/charges, and review of applicable trends or variations in users and utilization rates for the most recent five (5) years.

Member and Community Online Survey
The Project Team will develop and deploy an online community survey. The survey will focus on current users, past users, and non-users in order to obtain opinions and data related to:
 Past facility use
 Perceptions of the Sports Center as well as other existing facilities in the market  Likelihood of participating in existing and new offerings  Reasons for not using the Sports Center
 Facility amenity requirements and/or preferences
 Pricing insights and opinions in the areas
 Desired programs, classes, membership options and other community functions Detailed Optimization Report, Operational Findings, and Recommendations To culminate the stage of work/analysis, the Project Team will deliver an executive summarylevel narrative report that includes insight into the historic performance of the facility, the financial opportunity and reality based on data findings. It will also cover the recommendations based on the evaluation of the asset, an identification of challenges, and an outline of recommended next steps for either short-term or long-term planning including finding and recommendations from the following areas:
 Organizational Development
 Business Development
 Operational Processes & Systems
 Programming Review
 Financial Performance
 Physical Complex/Facility
Phase II: Optimization and Financial Recommendations
Detailed Financial Forecast (Pro Forma)
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 4, Packet Page 197 Based on the recommendations made in Phase I, the Project Team will complete more in-depth research/analysis to produce a 5-year cash flow forecast and 20-year financial outlook. The pro forma documents are detailed, institutional-grade financial forecasts used to better understand Return on Investment and support decision making and financing.

The pro forma will provide detailed financial projections related to and based on:
 Ideal Business Model
 Realistic and/or recommended debt-to-equity mix and debt service  Right-sized program spaces and space requirements
 Renovation costs based on recent, comparable projects  Recommended parking
 Revenue product/program
 Direct/variable costs (cost of goods sold)
 Facility and operating expenses
 Management and staffing model
 Utilization projections
 Visitation and economic impact projections
Detailed Optimization Timeline
The Project Team will complete a detailed development timeline documenting the strategies and tactical action steps to be taken to develop the operation and see it to its optimal operational success. The Optimization Timeline provides a foundation for important decisions related to the strategic direction of the project and represents the detailed action items and strategies required to achieve the financial forecast produced in Phase I.

Conclusion
Staff is confident that SFC is an ideal match for this operational assessment. With the combined expertise of City staff and the SFC Project Team, this arrangement will help the City, specifically the Sports Center, forge the path forward and develop the foundation of an equitable, accessible, safe, economically viable, and sustainable plan for the Monterey Sports Center to serve Montereyans and the community for many years to come.

KL/aw
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 6., Item Page 5, Packet Page 198 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Hans Uslar, City Manager
Prepared By: Rafaela T. King, CPA, MBA, Finance Director SUBJECT: Adopt the FY2022/23 Operating Budget (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve a resolution adopting the FY2022/23 Operating Budget.

VALUE DRIVER:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The recommended actions are consistent with City Charter Section 6.3, and with established policy and procedures for adopting and amending the annual budget.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

This action would adopt the proposed FY2022/23 budget as follows:

OPERATING BUDGET - EXPENDITURES
FY2022/23 Operating
Expenditures Transfers In Out Total
General Fund $ 87,466,135 $ 1,500,000 $ 88,966,135
Other Funds $ 67,103,863 $ 1,125,517 $ 68,229,380
Total $ 154,569,998 $ 2,625,517 $ 157,195,515
The General Fund’s expenditures exceed the revenues by approximately $111K before the anticipated cost of salary adjustments, which is expected to increase the deficit by $2.2M. Staff intends to use projected salary savings and a portion of the unassigned fund balance as oneDate: 6/29/2022 Item No.: 7.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 1, Packet Page 199 time revenue enhancers to balance the budget. Other Funds include Special Revenue Funds, Enterprise Funds, Internal Service funds and Agency Funds.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council could choose to appropriate different amounts or choose to remove items from the budget.

DISCUSSION:

As presented at the May 27, 2022 City Council Study Session and the June 7th Council Meeting, Monterey continues to face budget challenges due to the ongoing structural deficit in the General Fund. Staff was able to present a proposed balanced budget for FY22/23, with the use of several one-time revenue enhancements inclusive of a projected four percent salary savings and use of projected FY2021/22 unassigned fund balance.

Since the May 27, 2022 Study Session, Staff refined the budgets further to align transfers of support services, reconciled FY22/23 position budget cost allocation, and adjustments to various reserve funds. The attachments to this report reflect the updated FY2022/23 proposed budget, which staff is recommending for adoption.

City Manager’s Budget Message
Structural Deficit
The General fund has experienced an ongoing structural deficit for several years. In 2019 and 2020, the City Council took matters to the voters who overwhelmingly approved tax measures to increase revenues for the City. In 2021 and 2022, the results of those tax increases can be seen in the financial statements. There is growth in Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) and Sales Tax has also increased. While this revenue uptick shows a strong rate of recovery in the City’s revenues, with the increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) above 8%, the result is that the City is just maintaining where it was prior to the pandemic. With this in mind, the City continues to be cognizant of its financial position while putting tools in place to mitigate the structural Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 2, Packet Page 200 deficit and processes and increasing revenue streams and cost recovery where feasible.

Overwhelming Infrastructure Needs
At the June 7th meeting, Council received an update about the need for the City to invest in its facilities. The City operates and maintains a variety of infrastructure assets throughout Monterey. The number of assets to be maintained or replaced keeps increasing.

The Council started building up reserves in the Sports Center, Conference Center, general facilities, and also invested into a newly formed Sea Level Rise Resiliency Reserve.

The 30-year old Sports Center is especially in dire need of capital improvements. Several previously replaced/rehabilitated components of the building have reached the end of their life cycle and their replacements must be addressed again.

The Board of Library Trustees has presented to the Council and the public their wishes for a newer and rehabilitated library. Recently, Council has asked staff to look into the replacement of the existing Police and Fire Station across the street from the library. Our other two fire stations are 60 years and older and in need of upgrades or rebuilding. The five community centers, three of which are currently operated by the City, need major overhauls as well.

Our tunnel, also called Minnie’s Ditch so named after then-Mayor Minnie Coyle, which connects New Monterey and Pacific Grove with Oldtown, is now celebrating its 55th birthday. A major rehabilitation is looming there as well.

One-Time Revenue Enhancements
The proposed FY22/23 budget was balanced partly with one-time revenue enhancements.

These enhancements included projected salary savings of 4%. This projected amount is based on the trends in vacancies and the length of time it takes to fulfill the vacant positions. While we would like to have all positions filled, we know through experience that attrition happens and fulfillment of positions with quality staff takes time.

As presented to Council as part of the March Mid-Year budget review, we expect the ending unassigned Fund Balance on June 30, 2022 to be more than expected at the time of adoption of the FY2021-22 budget. Modifications were made at that time to reflect the increase and increase the economic recovery reserve as well as establish other needed reserve funds. Since that time, we have noted the revenues from TOT and Sales Tax coming in stronger than expected as the Omicron variant of the COVID-19 virus has not had a huge negative effect in traveling for our city.

Follow-Up From June 7th Council Meeting
At the June 7th Council meeting Council discussed the immediate funding need for the Monterey Sport Center and Council expressed their hopes that some of the reinvestments necessary to operate the Sport Center would be carried by the Neighborhood Community Improvement Program (NCIP). Staff is happy to report that the NCIP committee will be making a recommendation to City Council to fund a NCIP project for the replacement of the dehumidifier Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 3, Packet Page 201 in the amount of $1.2m.

At budget mid-year, Council allocated $750,000 towards the Sports Center Reserve Fund. The proposed budget includes another allocation $250,000 towards this fund. Together with the NCIP funding, the City will be able to address the maintenance needs of the natatorium.

Additional work in the gymnasium has to be assessed and will be part of the FY 23/24 budget proposal.

Another discussion point was staff’s suggestion to suspend funding for the business districts.

During the meeting Council did discuss various options ranging from leaving the funding as is, to funding at 50%, and eliminating the funding in future years.

Staff’s recommendation is to eliminate funding for the business districts located on North Fremont, in New Monterey, on Cannery Row as well as Fisherman's Wharf. For the Old Monterey Business Association, staff recommends a reduction from $55,000 to $10,500. At the last Council meeting, staff outlined how the business districts are funding themselves. To make up for the loss of the City’s General Fund contribution of $, the New Monterey Business District consisting of approximately 130 businesses, can either decide to raise the cap of their fee structure (currently capped at $250 each) or request an annual voluntary contribution to the district of $80 per business.

Stated differently, the resulting cost savings of the General Fund will be used to partially pay for essential core services up to including investments into the Monterey Sports Center.

Staff recognizes the value of Monterey’s businesses. Council created a one-time $1 million Local Economic Stimulus Plan to award financial grants to business. So did federal programs. In the past two years taxpayer dollars have supported hundreds of businesses in Monterey with some of them receiving millions of dollars in grants and subsequent loan forgiveness through the Paycheck Protection Program (For a detailed listing please review https://www.federalpay.org/paycheck-protection-program).

Monterey’s contributions to our local businesses remain strong when taking into consideration the annual contributions to the MCCVB ($1.5M), Trolley Services ($350K), free outdoor seating permits, and substantially increased staffing and maintenance levels in public safety, public works, and parks and recreation.

Funding of Signature Community Events
As in previous years, staff proposes a contribution of $35,000 to First Night Monterey. This long standing signature event attracts thousands of locals and out-of-town visitors, many of them staying overnight, to Monterey by offering great entertainment options throughout Monterey’s historic downtown.

Staff also proposes to allocate $15,000 towards Old Monterey Business District to help fund and organize the 4th of July parade as well as the Annual Tree Lighting Ceremony in front of Colton Hall.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 4, Packet Page 202 Staffing Changes
We are still in the process of restoring staffing levels and addressing the service needs of each department. While we were not able to fulfill all requested positions in each department, we are proposing the following staffing modifications including of some additions, deletions, movement between funds, and reclassifications. Some adjustment requests are still being processed. For example, a requested adjustment to the Assistant City Attorney position is expected in July.

Other salary adjustments based on retention challenges (simply stated other cities are paying more than Monterey and are hiring our talent) will be brought to Council’s attention as we need to remain competitive within our labor market.
 Community Development
Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
Planning Manager* $160,000 $27,000 $13,000 $200,000
Property Manager $135,648 $20,000 $9,000 $164,648
Property Manager ($116,400) ($20,000) ($9,000) ($145,400) Admin Assistant RPT $41,746 $4,554 $2,821 $49,121
Admin Assistant PT ($25,000) $0 $0 ($25,000)
Total $243,769
 Finance Department
Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
Exec Assistant $17,556 $8,735 $1,587 $27,878
Business License
Inspector* (contract 3
years)
$85,560 $27,086 $7,518 $120,164
Finance Manager $125,572 $39,272 $13,348 $178,191
Senior Accountant ($116,400) ($39,272) ($13,348) ($169,019) Finance Manager $127,447 $6,637 $10,377 $144,460
Senior Accountant ($118,275) ($6,637) ($10,377) ($135,288) Total $166,386
 Fire Department
Addition Salary Benefits PERS Total
Division Chief $164,352 $28,218 $14,792 $207,362
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 5, Packet Page 203  Human Resources Department
Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
Deputy HR Manager ($145,248) ($17,470) ($13,130) ($175,848) Assistant HR Director $153,103 $39,218 $14,792 $207,362 Total $31,514
HR Specialist* (at MidYear) ($72,096) ($46,657) ($8,680) ($127,433) HR Coordinator $79,116 $46,657 $9,494 $135,267
HR Specialist* (at MidYear) ($70,340) ($8,163) ($8,469) ($86,972) HR Coordinator $74,995 $8,163 $9,000 $92,158
Total at MidYear$13,020*50% =
$6,510
 Library Department
Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
Librarian $75,684 $26,976 $6,812 $109,472
Library Assistant II $63,744 $26,730 $7,650 $98,124
Library Assistant II RPT ($48,876) ($1,279) ($5,632) ($55,786) Library Assistant II $63,744 $26,730 $7,650 $98,124
Library Assistant II RPT ($47,932) ($32,393) ($5,759) ($86,084) Total $273,322
****Difference to be
paid by Library Trust
Funds
$14,868 $25,451 $2,018 $42,337
 Parks & Recreation Department
Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
Park Maintenance Leadworker $70,104 $26,899 $6,310 $103,312 Recreation Specialist $53,844 $26,670 $4,846 $85,360
Greenbelt Coordinator $68,136 $26,871 $6,132 $101,139
Total $289,811
 Police Department
Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
Police Services Tech $70,152 $26,899 $6,314 $103,365
Total $103,365
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 6, Packet Page 204  Public Works Department
From
Fund
To Fund Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
101 625 Park Maint Worker ($47,256) ($26,602) ($4,272) ($78,130) 625 101 Accntng Specialist $88,752 $38,299 $8,024 $135,074 101 650 Buldng Maint
Craftsworker
($68,184) ($27,136) ($6,164) ($101,484)
101 Assoc Mechanical
Engineer
($112,344) ($28,323) ($10,156) ($150,823)
101 Eng Projects
Manager
$112,344 $28,323 $10,156 $150,823
101 Custodian $40,980 $26,490 $3,688 $71,158
101 Custodian $40,980 $26,490 $3,688 $71,158
101 Custodian $40,980 $26,490 $3,688 $71,158
101 Senior Custodian $47,160 $26,577 $4,244 $77,981
101 Facility Attendant ($57,696) ($26,724) ($5,193) ($89,613) 101 Lead Custodian $57,696 $26,724 $5,193 $89,613
Total $246,915
FUND
280
Fund Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
Vacant 280 Street Maint
Worker
55,284 26,691 $4,976 $86,951
Vacant 280 Street Maint
Worker
($76,920) ($27,359) ($6,954) ($111,232)
Total ($24,281)
FUND
625
Fund Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
625 101 Accntng Specialist ($88,752) ($38,299) ($8,024) ($135,074) 101 625 Park Maint Worker $47,256 $26,602 $4,272 $78,130 Total ($56,944)
FUND
650
Fund Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
650 Parts Clerk ($52,104) ($26,726) ($4,711) ($83,540)
650 Admin Assistant $55,644 $26,696 $5,008 $87,348
650 Quality Control
Inspect
($91,368) ($27,727) ($8,260) ($127,355)
650 HVAC Senior Tech $79,548 $27,031 $7,159 $113,738
650 Senior
Craftsworker
($69,624) ($27,173) ($6,294) ($103,091)
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 7, Packet Page 205 650 Admin Assistant
RPT
($39,312) ($1,060) ($3,554) ($43,926)
650 Public Works
Inspect
($83,136) ($27,516) ($7,516) ($118,168)
650 Eng Project
Manager
$112,344 $28,323 $10,156 $150,823
650 Park Maint Worker ($55,284) ($26,691) ($4,976) ($86,951) 101 650 Buldng Maint
Craftsworker
$68,184 $27,136 $6,164 $101,484
Total ($109,638)
FUND
708
Fund Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
708 Admin Assistant $55,644 $26,696 $5,008 $87,348
708 Field Assistant ($60,696) ($26,944) ($5,487) ($93,127) Total ($5,779)
 ISD Department
Fund 710
Fund Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
710 Information Tech
Special
($91,584) ($15,175) ($8,240) ($115,000)
710 Sr. Inform Tech Special $95,706 $15,175 $8,614 $119,494 710 Information Tech
Analyst
($103,896) ($35,788) ($12,414) ($152,098)
710 IT Application Eng II $123,744 $35,788 $14,849 $174,382 710 Information Tech
Analyst
($103,104) ($35,788) ($12,414) ($152,098)
710 IT Application Eng II $123,744 $35,788 $14,849 $174,382 710 Information Tech
Analyst
($103,536) ($68,807) ($9,321) ($181,664)
710 IT Application Eng II $123,744 $68,807 $11,137 $203,688 710 Systems & Network
Admin* (Increase)
$3,790 $341 $4,131
Total $75,217
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 8, Packet Page 206  Risk Management
Fund 716 Reclass/Additions Salary Benefits PERS Total
HR Analyst (Risk
Management)
($92,496) ($29,240) ($11,136) ($132,872)
Risk Manager $130,000 $30,000 $13,348 $173,348
Total $40,476
Five Year Projections
A summary of the General Fund 5-Year Forecast is as follows, assuming a continued growth in revenue and conservative increases in operating costs.

General Fund ($ million)
FY 21/22
Amended
Budget
FY22/23
Proposed
Budget
FY23/24
Projected
Budget
FY24/25
Projected
Budget
FY25/26
Projected
Budget
FY26/27
Projected
Budget
Revenue $ 87.3 $ 88.8 $ 90.5 $ 92.4 $ 94.0 $ 96.6
Expenditure $ (82.0) $ (91.1) $ (92.9) $ (94.8) $ (96.7) $ (98.6) Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditure $ 5.3 $ (2.3) $ (2.4) $ (2.4) $ (2.7) $ (2.0) Transfers, Debt Service & CIP
Transfer In $ 0.7 $ 1.1 $ 1.1 $ 0.8 $ - $ -
Transfer Out Other $ (0.1) $ (0.2) $ (0.2) $ (0.2) $ (0.1) $ (0.1) Transfer Out Debt Service $ (0.5) $ (0.5) $ (0.5) $ (0.5) $ (0.5) $ (0.5) Transfer Out Capital Improvement Program $ (1.5) $ (0.8) $ (0.8) $ (0.5) $ (0.5) $ (0.5) Net Transfer (Use) $ (1.5) $ (0.4) $ (0.4) $ (0.4) $ (1.2) $ (1.2) Estimated Surplus/(Deficit) $ 3.8 $ (2.7) $ (2.8) $ (2.8) $ (3.8) $ (3.2) Funded Reserves
At Mid-Year, council approved allocating funding to various reserve funds to maintain the Economic Uncertainty fund, start funding the $173M pension liability, funding deferred maintenance costs for other facilities, and deferred technology upgrades. Staff proposes to continue funding at minimum levels these funds as part of the annual budget process.

Reserves & Designations
($ Millions)
6/30/2022
(Amended)
6/30/2023
(Estimated)
6/30/2024
(Estimated)
6/30/2025
(Estimated)
6/30/2026
(Estimated)
6/30/2027
(Estimated)
Economic Uncertainty $ 2.40 $ 0.21 $ 0.30 $ 0.31 $ 0.31 $ 0.32 Capital Projects (On-Going) $ 0.75 $ 0.75 $ 0.75 $ 0.75 $ 0.75 $ 0.75 Encumbrances (PO) $ (0.70) $ (0.75) $ (0.50) $ (0.50) $ - $ - Other Designations $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Pension Fund $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00
Conference Center Facilities $ 0.75 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 Sport Center Facilities $ 0.90 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 Technology $ 1.50 $ 0.25 $ 0.75 $ 0.75 $ 0.25 $ 0.25
Other Facilities $ - $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 Total $ 6.60 $ 1.96 $ 2.80 $ 2.81 $ 2.81 $ 2.82
Conclusion and Recommendation
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 9, Packet Page 207 The increased revenue trend is a strong indicator that the City is starting to recover from the devastating loss of revenue due to the pandemic. As we bask in this fact and eagerly look towards the future for full recovery, we must continue to be mindful that we are not quite there yet. This budget proposes to continue funding our increasing operating expenses, reserve funds, deferred maintenance and technology, needed staff positions, and provide modest cost of living increases to our staff, who provide services to our community members.

Monterey’s hospitality sector will continue to be the major contributor to our budgets. The extraordinary successful funding of the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) remains highly dependent on the success of our hotels, motels, restaurants, and other tourism-based shops. And, Monterey residents will continue to weigh the pros and cons of living in one of the most desirable areas in the world.

The City's investment into the Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau (MCCVB) supports the regional and Monterey-specific destination marketing. Both investments (NCIP and MCCVB) consume 22% of the tax revenues derived from Transient Occupancy Tax. The question staff will need to address over the next 12 months will include how existing needs and future needs can be balanced in the framework of the City’s Charter and existing policies.

As the next fiscal year moves forward, staff will continue to vigorously look for ways to improve the financial footing of the City while being fiscally responsible stewards of City resources.

Fiscal stewardship involves maintaining core services, addressing the City’s pension liability, investing in the short and long-term infrastructure needs, and prioritizing what is most important to the community.

All in all: we are ahead from where we were last year. Our budget is balanced, our reserves are better than they were before, and we have managed to set new funding aside for future obligations including pension obligations. We need to continue allocating funding towards our reserves as future generations should have new opportunities to develop our city instead of struggling to maintain what today’s generation has created. The concept of “intergenerational conflict” should remain a guiding principle when we are looking for long-term solutions.

The voter-approved infrastructure tax measures (Measures P/S and Measure X) have changed how our road network functions and looks. The additional hotel tax (Measure Y) and sales tax (Measure G) measures help us balance our budgets and support our efforts to bring back previously lost positions that support City services.

We want to express our appreciation to the Mayor and City Council for their leadership and guidance and all the staff who worked tirelessly and collaboratively with fiscal stewardship in mind in developing the proposed budget. We include in our thanks the many residents, who have shared with us their proposals and their opinions. A special thanks goes to the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Neighborhood Community Improvement Commission who both came to the help of our Monterey Sport Center.

We recommend the adoption of this proposed budget so that the City can continue work towards the value drivers of serving as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 10, Packet Page 208 HU/rtk
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Revenue and Expense Statements and Position Control List Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 11, Packet Page 209 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№12/12
ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 OPERATING BUDGET

OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
WHEREAS, the proposed operating budget of the City of Monterey for the fiscal year 2022-2023 was prepared and submitted to the City Council by the City Manager in accordance with Section 6.3 of the City Charter;
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed operating budget and thereafter caused a public appearance to be held concerning the budget; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as finding of the City Council as if fully set forth herein. The City Council hereby adopts and approves the Proposed Operating Budgets for FY 2022-23 with Exhibit A attached to this resolution and containing information as required in Section 6.3 of the Monterey City Charter, as amended by the City Council, as the budget of the City of Monterey in the following amounts:

OPERATING BUDGET - REVENUES
FY2022/23 Operating Revenues Transfers In Total
General Fund $ 87,729,263 $ 1,125,517 $ 88,854,780
Other Funds $ 97,321,703 $ 1,500,000 $ 98,821,703
Total $ 183,672,725 $ 2,625,517 $ 187,676,483
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 12, Packet Page 210 2 OPERATING BUDGET - EXPENDITURES
FY2022/23 Operating Expenditures Transfers In Out Total General Fund $ 87,466,135 $ 1,500,000 $ 88,966,135
Other Funds $ 67,103,863 $ 1,125,517 $ 68,229,380
Total $ 154,569,998 $ 2,625,517 $ 157,195,515
A copy of said budget (EXHIBIT A), as modified and amended, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and is hereby referred to for further particulars.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT monies may be transferred from one account to another with the approval of the City Manager or his designee except for the following transfers which may be made only with the approval of the City Council:
a. Transfers to or from Special Funds where state or federal regulations require Council approval;
b. Transfers from unappropriated reserves or fund balances.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT sixteen percent (16%) of the total projected revenue from Transient Occupancy Taxes is hereby appropriated in the annual amount of $4,960,000 for use in the Neighborhood Improvement Program for FY 2022-23. This amount is the total appropriation from which all applicable City administration and program expenses will be deducted as appropriate.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Manager is hereby authorized to take any and all actions necessary to obtain reimbursement for all expenses related to the COVID-19 crisis from any Federal, State or County agency or any other agency providing such reimbursement, and to reimburse the Funds used to pay those expenses in FY 2021-22.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Manager is hereby authorized to create fund accounts and projects as necessary to accurately record the appropriations in this budget, including the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursement funding, as applicable.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the proposed transfers included in the Interfund Transfers schedule that is part of the FY 2022-23 Proposed Operating Budget as amended are Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 13, Packet Page 211 3 hereby adopted and approved; and that the Finance Director is hereby authorized to make administrative budget adjustments to the schedule as deemed necessary.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 14, Packet Page 212

OPERATING BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022 - 2023 STARTING JULY 1
Attachment 2 1
Attachment 2
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 15, Packet Page 213 Attachment 2 2
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 16, Packet Page 214 Mission Statement
Monterey: A beautiful, special place to live, work, and visit. Anda! Vision Statement
In partnership with our entire community, the Monterey City Council provides visionary leadership ensuring a safe, healthy, historic, economically vibrant, and sustainable environment.

Attachment 2 3
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 17, Packet Page 215

VALUE DRIVERS &

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 4
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 18, Packet Page 216 Ensure the health and wellness of the community including the COVID-19 pandemic response through emergency operations, clear communication with the public, delivering vaccinations, supporting testing efforts, issuing emergency orders, managing social distancing regulations, adopting eviction protections, hosting blood drives, and providing food security.

Recognize that public safety is a priority to ensure that our City is safe and welcoming to all, contributing to our economic vitality as a destination City.

Prepare for emergencies and community resiliency.

Foster opportunities for the public to stay physically and mentally active through activities and services in our parks, trails, beaches, campgrounds, sports center, and community centers.

Provide learning opportunities and foster community connection through the Monterey Public Library.

Respond effectively to neighborhood concerns.

Fund projects for the betterment of Monterey’s neighborhoods through the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP).

Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities
QUALITY OF LIFE – In collaboration with our
community partners, work to improve the quality of
life of all of our community members by fostering
diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing
equitable access to affordable housing; and
maintaining a safe environment.

The Council is committed to ensuring Monterey
retains its special character, which derives from its
heritage, size, and location. The Council also is
committed to ensuring that Monterey is a safe,
affordable, and inclusive place to live, work, and visit.

Diversity, equity and inclusion, affordable housing,
public safety, and community collaboration are
cornerstones contributing to Monterey’s quality of
life.

Quality of Life Strategic Priorities
Attachment 2 5
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 19, Packet Page 217 The City Council is committed to balancing economic activity by supporting Monterey’s economic drivers, including but not limited to hospitality, academia, health care, retail, military, and fisheries. The Council also recognizes that continued prudent fiscal discipline helps ensure the high quality of life and services for residents; strategies include appropriate service levels, optimizing City operations, driving innovation that leverages technology and business solutions, ensuring workforce compensation and benefit structures are both competitive and financially sustainable, ensuring appropriate municipal infrastructure needs are addressed, implementing appropriate revenue enhancement opportunities, providing reliable and timely fiscal reporting, and fostering community partnerships.

Fiscal Stewardship Strategic Priorities
Protect the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and our environmental assets from pollution.

Develop a long-term strategy for Municipal Wharf No. 2 and a sustainable fishing industry.

Continue efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG).

Expand access to electric vehicle infrastructure and encourage sustainable transportation.

The City Council recognizes the necessity of bold, pragmatic, and thoughtful solutions to protect our natural environment for future generations. Community decisions on transportation, land use, sea level rise, coastal protection, forestry, and city government operations can have a positive impact on our environment locally, regionally, and globally.

Protecting Our Environment Strategic Priorities
PROTECTING OUR ENVIRONMENT – Protect and preserve our natural environment by addressing climate change through ecologically responsible and pragmatic solutions.

Carefully manage City revenues and expenditures which support the delivery of City services.

Consider appropriate revenue enhancements to support City services and operations.

Attachment 2 6
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 20, Packet Page 218 Restore and establish City reserves at levels that provide fiscal resiliency and ability to address various economic and natural disasters.

Support business retention and business attraction efforts through partnerships with local business, business associations, and the chamber of commerce.

Support our military installations (U.S. Army Garrison Presidio of Monterey, Naval Support Activity Monterey, and U.S. Coast Guard Station Monterey) as significant economic drivers in the region.

Identify and seek grant funding opportunities for City services and infrastructure, including parks, recreation, library, museums, public safety, fire prevention, and planning.

Prioritize funding models and sources for facility rehabilitation, repair, and replacement.

Track, monitor, and respond to ongoing pension liability costs.

Drive innovation through technology and business solutions that enhance productivity and effectiveness for staff, as well as customer service for the public.

DEVELOP AND RETAIN A QUALITY WORKFORCE – Provide sufficient resources and support to develop, retain, and recruit a high quality city workforce.

The Council knows that the quality of city services correlates directly with the quality of city employees. For that reason, the Council is committed to supporting strategies that ensure Monterey can consistently attract, develop, and retain employees capable of delivering services consistent with their vision for the future of the City including providing employees with the tools and resources they need to be successful in serving the public.

Develop and Retain a Quality Workforce Strategic Priorities Recognize that our workforce is our greatest resource for providing the service that our community deserves by providing city staff with the tools, resources, coaching, and feedback they need to perform well.

Attachment 2 7
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 21, Packet Page 219 Support the City workforce through the COVID-19 pandemic including the implementation of citywide staffing and operational retooling, return-to-work protocols, COVID-19 contact tracing and notifications, and phase-in of the Reopening and Rehiring Fund.

Implement best practices in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) through training, performance, hiring, and recruitment efforts.

Foster employee safety and wellness, including provision of a robust safety program, employeecentric and employee-led Safety Committee, frequent safety tailgate meetings, an efficient vehicle fleet management program, and other efforts.

Provide fair, competitive, and market-rate compensation and benefits to employees through effective labor negotiations.

SECURE WATER SOURCES – Champion regional and local efforts to secure adequate, affordable, and sustainable water sources for the city, now and into the future.

The Council recognizes that access to a dependable supply of fresh water is a significant gating factor that impacts the City’s ability to provide affordable housing and promote economic vitality consistent with the goals described in the City’s General Plan.

Secure Water Sources Strategic Priorities
Continue to advocate and lobby on behalf of the City of Monterey’s interests on regional water issues, with an emphasis on securing water for affordable housing projects.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING – Support efforts and policies that provide equitable access to affordable housing in Monterey and the region.

The Council embraces efforts that provide equitable access to affordable housing, including balanced approaches to increase housing supply, rental resources and assistance, and housing rehabilitation grants to homeless, low-income, senior and disabled individuals.

Affordable Housing Strategic Priorities
Support affordable housing through modern zoning policies/ordinances, ADU policies, housing grants, review of density requirements, and consideration of City-owned sites for affordable housing.

Address homelessness through programs and partnerships such as the Multidisciplinary Outreach Team (MDOT) and continued support of homeless service agencies through the City’s Community Development Block Grant program such as but not limited to Gathering for Women and Community Human Services.

Attachment 2 8
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 22, Packet Page 220 ACTIVE MOBILITY – Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

The Council is committed to developing policies and supporting plans that create an environment where people, bicycles, buses, trolleys, and motor vehicles can move through the community safely and efficiently. The City Council also prioritizes pedestrian and bicyclist safety and mobility over driver convenience, and continues to value “Vision Zero” strategies of education, equity, engineering, evaluation, and enforcement.

Active Mobility Strategic Priorities
Maintain and repair core street, roadway, and storm drain infrastructure.

Provide and deploy effective parking facilities, programs, and enforcement tools that support resident, business, and visitor access to various business districts and neighborhoods.

Continue supporting planning and construction efforts for regional trail networks.

Continue to enhance mobility for people of all ages and abilities.

HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND DIVERSITY – Preserve, promote, and maintain our City’s historic and cultural resources through responsible stewardship and historic preservation that highlights the contributions and perspectives of all people who are a part of Monterey’s diverse history.

The City Council is committed to support policies and plans that ensure the protection, appropriate development, and use of the City’s historic and cultural assets. The City Council also recognizes the importance of sharing the City’s diverse history through the lens of the Native Americans, Latinx, Euro-Americans, African Americans, and Asian American/Pacific Islander communities who have contributed to the Monterey community.

Historic Preservation and Diversity Strategic Priorities Ensure that the community’s history is interpreted and presented from a social justice lens.

Preserve and protect Monterey’s maritime history.

Attachment 2 9
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 23, Packet Page 221 TRANSPARENT AND INCLUSIVE GOVERNMENT – Foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all.

The City Council is committed to transparency, collaboration, and engagement with all of our residents, neighborhoods, businesses, and community partners through robust channels of communication including inperson, technology-based, and media outreach efforts. The City Council is also committed to providing core services to the community, and partnering with business, nonprofit, military, and government partners where appropriate.

Transparent and Inclusive Government Strategic Priorities Maintain and expand methods for the public to engage and interact with their city government using a variety of engagement tools including media outreach, digital communications, and inperson engagement.

Provide information and access to tools and resources through the City’s website.

Understand City leaders’ values and priorities by facilitating annual discussions about the City Council’s Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities.

Recognize that City government’s role is to provide core services to the public, and partnerships with nonprofit, military, business, and other government agencies can be an effective means of supporting the public good.

Attachment 2 10
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 24, Packet Page 222 Attachment 2 11
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 25, Packet Page 223 City of Monterey
Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Draft version pending adoption by the Monterey City Council on June 29, 2022 City Council
Mayor Clyde Roberson
Vice Mayor Ed Smith
Councilmember Dan Albert
Councilmember Alan Haffa
Councilmember Tyller Williamson
Principal Administrative Officers
City Manager .................................................................................................................................................... Hans Uslar City Attorney ............................................................................................................................................... Christine Davi Assistant City Manager ................................................................................................................... Nat Rojanasathira Community Development Director ..................................................................................................... Kimberly Cole Finance Director............................................................................................................................................Rafaela King Fire Chief .......................................................................................................................................... Gaudenz Panholzer Human Resources Director ......................................................................................................................... Brette Neal Library & Museums Director ......................................................................................................................... Inga Waite Parks and Recreation Director ............................................................................................................... Karen Larson Police Chief .................................................................................................................................................... Dave Hober Public Works Director .................................................................................................................................. Steve Wittry City Clerk ............................................................................................................................... Clementine Bonner Klein Budget Team Members
Rafaela King • Jordan Cupps • Wendy Davies • Stella Sandoval Gina Russo • Carol Hewitt • Laurie Huelga
Hans Uslar • Nat Rojanasathira • Allyson Hauck • Brette Neal Attachment 2 12
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 26, Packet Page 224 Table of Contents
Vision and Mission Statement .....................................................................................................................................

Value Drivers and Strategic Initiatives .......................................................................................................................

City Council and Principal Administrative Officers ................................................................................................

Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................................................................

City Manager’s Budget Message .................................................................................................................................

City Organizational Chart ............................................................................................................................................

City Services & History ..................................................................................................................................................

Budget Framework
Budgeting Process and Calendar .............................................................................................................................

Basis of Budgeting & Fund Structure ......................................................................................................................

Combined Statements ................................................................................................................................................

Summary
Revenues ..........................................................................................................................................................................

Summary of Revenues by Fund ..........................................................................................................................

Summary of Revenues by Type ..........................................................................................................................

Expenditures ....................................................................................................................................................................

Summary of Operating Expenditures by Fund ...............................................................................................

Summary of General Fund Expenditures by Department ...........................................................................

Summary of Operating Expenditures by Department ..................................................................................

Summary of Operating Expenditures by Fund and Division .......................................................................

Five-Year Forecast ..........................................................................................................................................................

Reserves & Designations ...............................................................................................................................................

Interfund Transfers ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 4
5 6
16 25
27 35
37 45
47 48
50 55
56 57
58 59
65 67
69 Attachment 2 13
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 27, Packet Page 225 Position Control ..............................................................................................................................................................

Amended Position Control List ...........................................................................................................................

Funded Fiscal Year 2022-2023 .............................................................................................................................

Appendix
Financial Policies ............................................................................................................................................................

Glossary .............................................................................................................................................................................

73 74
83 84
87 Attachment 2 14
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 28, Packet Page 226 Attachment 2 15
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 29, Packet Page 227

CITY MANAGER'S

BUDGET MESSAGE
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 16
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 30, Packet Page 228 To:

From:

Date:

Subject:

Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, Residents, and City Staff City Manager
June 29, 2022
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Annual Operating Budget Message
Dear Mayor Clyde, Vice Mayor Smith and Council Members Albert, Haffa and Williamson:

Our staff and I are pleased to present the proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 City budget. Like in the previous year, we are presenting an annual budget and not a biennial budget. We do this in recognition of a variety of potential factors, which might influence our local economy and revenues. Inflation has risen, and while the experts have not yet agreed on the prospect of a recession, fiscal prudence requires us to present a cautiously optimistic outlook for the next twelve months. Our caring City Council has been acutely aware of the economic realities while restoring services in a fiscally responsible manner. It is my hope that our budget will be reflective of the priorities set by you and our community.

While many of our visitors, residents and events have returned to 'normal', the pandemic is still a factor and as we are drafting this message, Monterey County once again is recording a significant increase in infections and back into the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) category of “High Risk.” Balancing Our Budget and Delivering Core Services
The presented budget is realistic and takes care
of almost all City-supplied core services and beyond.

Our staffing levels in Parks and Recreation as well
as in our Library are budgeted to grow as our
patrons return to receive services. In parallel, we
are experiencing significant employment losses
within some of our professional ranks, as, not
surprisingly, our talent is being actively recruited
by other neighboring cities, who are offering more
attractive pay and benefits.Staff will be continuing
to monitor the challenges in recruiting and retaining
and periodically asking Council for approval of Monterey Public Library, California's First Library, established 1849 Attachment 2 17
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 31, Packet Page 229 personnel-related matters that align with one of Council’s strategic priorities: to “provide fair, competitive, and market-rate compensation and benefits to employees.” While it is good to know that our staff are being actively wooed by other agencies, and despite having depth of knowledge among existing staff, the City cannot afford a continued drain in key positions.

Revenue and Expenditure Outlook
The General fund has experienced an ongoing structural deficit for several years. In 2019 and 2020, the City Council took matters to the voters who overwhelmingly approved tax measures to increase revenues for the City. In 2021 and 2022, the results of those tax increases can be seen in the financial statements. At budget midyear, Council kept the promises made and allocated $1 million to a pension obligation reserve fund. The proposed budget contains another allocation of $1 million towards our CalPERS’ unfunded pension liability of $170 million.

There is growth in Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT).

The projected growth in TOT is mainly based on
higher room rates and less on higher occupancy
rates. The sales tax accompanies the growth of the
TOT as more visitors to the Monterey Peninsula are
flocking to Monterey’s main tourist attractions.

While this revenue uptick shows a strong rate of
recovery in the City’s revenues, with the increases in
the Consumer Price Index (CPI) above 8%, the result
is that the City is just maintaining service levels where it was prior to the pandemic. FY 21/22 was balanced
because of an infusion of a federal American Rescue
Plan Act (ARPA) funds in the amount of $6.5 million intended to help offset our losses of $32 million. The good news is that our revenues in FY 22/23 will allow us to balance the budget without dipping into our own reserves.

With this in mind, the City continues to be cognizant of its financial position while putting tools in place to mitigate the structural deficit by increasing revenue streams and cost recovery where feasible.

Funding Infrastructure Rehabilitation: A Community Priority At the June 7th meeting, Council received an update about the need for the City to invest in its facilities. The City operates and maintains a variety of infrastructure assets throughout Monterey. The number of assets to be maintained or replaced keeps increasing. The Council started building up reserves in the Sports Center, Conference Center, and general facilities. For the first time we also invested into a newly-formed Sea Level Rise Resiliency Reserve.

The 30-year-old Sports Center is especially in dire need of capital improvements. Several previously replaced/rehabilitated components of the building have reached the end of their life cycle and their replacements must be addressed again.

The Fun, Fast, FREE MST Trolley ready for summer.

Attachment 2 18
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 32, Packet Page 230 The Board of Library Trustees has presented
to the Council and the public their wishes for a
newer and rehabilitated library. Recently,
Council has asked staff to look into the
replacement of the existing Police and Fire
Station across the street from the library.

Our other two fire stations are over 60 years
old and are in need of upgrades or rebuilding.

The five community centers, three of which
are currently operated by the City, need major
overhauls as well. There are little if any
funds allocated towards these facility needs,
which exceed tens of millions of dollars.

Our tunnel, affectionately called Minnie’s Ditch after former Mayor Minnie Coyle, which connects New Monterey and Pacific Grove with Downtown, is now celebrating its 55th birthday. A major rehabilitation is looming there as well.

Fiscal Enhancements and Building Needed Reserves
The proposed FY22/23 budget was balanced partly with one-time fiscal enhancements. These enhancements included projected salary savings of 4%. This projected amount is based on the trends in vacancies and the length of time it takes to fulfill the vacant positions. While we would like to have all positions filled, we know through experience that attrition happens and fulfillment of positions with quality staff takes time.

Modifications were made at that time to reflect the increase and increase the economic recovery reserve as well as establish other needed reserve funds. Since that time, we have noted the revenues from TOT and Sales Tax coming in stronger than expected as the Omicron variant of the COVID-19 virus has not had a huge negative effect in traveling for our city. Additionally, at the end of June 2022, we can expect a revised property tax estimate from the County’s Assessor’s office, hopefully confirming our projected increases, which are already part of this proposed budget.

Investing in the Monterey Sports Center
At the June 7th Council meeting, Council discussed the immediate funding need for the Monterey Sports Center and expressed their hopes that some of the reinvestments necessary to operate the Sports Center would be carried by the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP). Staff is happy to report that the NCIP committee will be making a recommendation to City Council to fund a NCIP project for the replacement of the dehumidifier in the amount of $1.2 million. We are grateful for the collaboration between two equally important commissions, the NCIP and the Parks and Recreation Commission At budget mid-year, Council allocated $750,000 towards the Sports Center Reserve Fund. The proposed budget Fire Station #11 on Pacific Street on 4th of July. Photo by Sheldon Chang Attachment 2 19
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 33, Packet Page 231 includes another allocation of $250,000 towards this fund.

Together with the NCIP funding, the City will be able to address the maintenance needs of the natatorium.

Additional work in the gymnasium must be assessed and
will be part of the FY 23/24 budget proposal.

Another discussion point was staff’s suggestion to
suspend funding for the business districts. During the
meeting Council did discuss various options ranging from leaving the funding as is, to funding at 50%, and
eliminating the funding in future years. The Natatorium at the Monterey Sports Center Prioritizing Funding: City Services vs. Community Organizations Staff’s suggestion highlights another essential spending challenge. Over the past decades, Monterey has been a generous partner and fiscal contributor to many community organizations, both private and non-profits.

Unfortunately, as we are looking to balance our budgets, we need to take a closer look at how we spend taxpayer dollars. Monterey will remain a partner and when called upon, as in 2020, step up to help and provide financial support. However, we need to continue to challenge the expectation by some solvent interest groups that taxpayer dollars generated in the business districts need to be partially returned to those who generate them through the for-profit enterprises. We also need to challenge the expectation that city government should financially support nonprofit organizations. All too often local governments are challenged to operate like any other business, and all too often when local government do that, municipalities get criticized when it is perceived that they go against for-profit interests. Every dollar has a purpose and is valuable. We need to ask ourselves the difficult question: should public dollars be used to support services such as public safety, parks, and infrastructure, or should they be used to support other community groups? With the high cost of doing business, the answer can’t always be both.

Grants issued by the City of Monterey for the Local Economic Stimulus Plan - interactive map on Covid-19 page at haveyoursaymonterey.org.

Attachment 2 20
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 34, Packet Page 232 City Council and staff recognize the value of Monterey’s businesses. In April 2020, Council created a one-time $1 million Local Economic Stimulus Plan to award financial grants to business. So did federal programs. In the past two years taxpayer dollars have supported hundreds of businesses in Monterey with some of them receiving millions of dollars in grants and subsequent loan forgiveness through the Paycheck Protection Program (For a detailed listing please review https://www.federalpay.org/paycheck-protection-program).

Monterey’s contributions to our local businesses remain strong when taking into consideration the annual contributions to the Monterey County Convention & Visitors Bureau (MCCVB) for regional marketing ($1.5M), trolley services ($350K) which transport more than 250,000 visitors to Fisherman’s Wharf, Cannery Row and the Aquarium, free outdoor seating permits, and substantially increased staffing and maintenance levels in Police, Fire, Public Works, and Park maintenance.

Staff’s recommendation incorporated into the proposed budget is to eliminate funding for the business districts located on North Fremont, in New Monterey, on Cannery Row as well as Fisherman's Wharf. For the Old Monterey Business Association, staff recommends a reduction from $55,000 to $10,500. Stated differently, the resulting cost savings of the General Fund will be used to partially pay for essential core services up to including investments into the Monterey Sports Center and the City’s Museums.

As in previous years, staff proposes a contribution of $35,000 to First Night Monterey. This long-standing signature event attracts thousands of locals and out-of-town visitors, many of them staying overnight, to Monterey by offering great entertainment options throughout Monterey’s historic downtown. Staff also proposes to allocate $15,000 towards Old Monterey Business District to help fund and organize the 4th of July parade as well as the Annual Tree Lighting Ceremony in front of Colton Hall.

The increased revenue trend is a strong indicator
that the City is starting to recover from the
devastating loss of revenue due to the pandemic.

As we bask in this fact and eagerly look towards
the future for full recovery, we must continue
to be mindful that we are not quite there yet.

This budget proposes to continue funding
our increasing operating expenses, reserve funds,
deferred maintenance and technology, needed
staff positions, and provide modest cost of living
increases to our staff, who provide services to our
community members.

The Monterey Sports Center has not seen patrons
return in numbers close to pre-pandemic years. The proposed budget accounts for that loss of revenues. Over the next 12 months, staff will analyze and revise our business model to ensure that this facility remains a flagship and key asset of our community, operated and owned by the City, the taxpayers of Monterey. Private enterprises do not have a monopoly on running cost efficient operations – local governments can do the same and better as we are not required to return profits.

Tree lighting event in December at Colton Hall
Attachment 2 21
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 35, Packet Page 233 Hospitality-driven Economy Supports Resident Services
Monterey’s hospitality sector will continue to be the major contributor to our budgets and how the City can afford fire, police, public works, recreation, library, and other core services that citizens cherish. The extraordinary successful funding of the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) remains highly dependent on the success of our hotels and motels. Monterey residents will continue to weigh the pros and cons of living in one of the most desirable areas in the world.

Front of the Monterey Conference Center
The City's investment into the Monterey County Convention and Visitors Bureau (MCCVB) supports the regional and
Monterey-specific destination marketing. Both investments (NCIP and MCCVB) consume 22% of the tax revenues
derived from Transient Occupancy Tax. The question staff will need to address over the next 12 months will include how existing needs and future needs can be balanced
within the framework of the existing City Charter and
existing policies. The City needs to continue to invest in marketing the destination– the question to be addressed within the framework of the MCCVB will be how much and
where?
Continuing the City’s Fiscal Stewardship
As the next fiscal year moves forward, staff will continue to vigorously look for ways to improve the financial footing of the City while being fiscally responsible stewards of City resources. Fiscal stewardship involves maintaining core services, addressing the City’s pension liability, investing in the short and long-term infrastructure needs, and prioritizing what is most important to the community.

All in all: we are ahead from where we were last year. Our budget is balanced, our reserves are better than they were before, and we have managed to set new funding aside for future obligations including pension obligations. We need to continue allocating
funding towards our reserves as future
generations should have new opportunities
to develop our city instead of struggling to
maintain what today’s generation has created.

The concept of “intergenerational conflict”
should remain a guiding principle when we are
looking for long-term solutions.

The voter-approved infrastructure tax
measures (Measures P/S and Measure X)
have changed how our road network
functions and looks. The additional hotel
tax (Measure Y) and sales tax (Measure G)
measures help us balance our budgets and
support our efforts to bring back previously lost positions that support City services.

Measure P & S Citywide Road Citywide Road Rehab
Attachment 2 22
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 36, Packet Page 234 Anda! Forward!
Our employees deserve our recognition and gratitude. Throughout the pandemic our employees have provide steadfast services to all. I am proud to lead our team which represents the best of the best of public servants.

Our talent, as stated in my introduction, is highly sought after by other agencies, who are able to offer higher pay up to including signing bonuses. Monterey is lucky to have talented employees who are recruited to neighboring cities such as Carmel, Pacific Grove, Seaside, and Salinas. Yet, we cannot continue to lose those professionals, who are the shining stars our organization. Our future labor contracts, currently being negotiated, will try to strike a balance between what we can afford and what we need to do to retain our talent.

Anda!
Hans Uslar
City Manager
Attachment 2 23
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 37, Packet Page 235 Attachment 2 24
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 38, Packet Page 236

ORGANIZATIONAL
CHART
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 25
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 39, Packet Page 237 Attachment 2 26
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 40, Packet Page 238

CITY SERVICES &

HISTORY
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 27
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 41, Packet Page 239 About Monterey
The City of Monterey is a waterfront community
where citizens, community organizations, businesses,
military partners, nonprofit organizations, and city
government work together to ensure that the
community retains its hometown identity, high quality
of life, and natural beauty. Home to 29,874 residents
(US Census, July 2021 estimate), Monterey is the
third-largest city in Monterey County.

Monterey is at the heart of the Monterey Peninsula,
serving as the region’s business, financial,
government, and services core with urban amenities
common to a city of much larger size. Monterey
is home to the region’s community college (Monterey
Peninsula College), hospital (Community Hospital of
the Monterey Peninsula), largest shopping center (Del Monte Center), largest business park (Ryan Ranch), Monterey County Fairgrounds, the U.S. Army Garrison Presidio of Monterey (home of the Defense Language Institute), Naval Support Activity Monterey (home of the Naval Postgraduate School), Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, Cannery Row, and Monterey Bay Aquarium. Monterey’s waterfront is secondto-none, featuring Municipal Wharf No. 1 (serving as the region’s commercial fishing hub), Old Fisherman’s Wharf (attracting 3.9 million visitors per year), the Coast Guard Pier, Breakwater Cove, and U.S. Coast Guard Station Monterey.

At the same time, the city provides a small-town atmosphere and distinct neighborhoods that range from historic adobes to mid-century modern abodes. Monterey is proud of its 16 neighborhoods, stretching across the City’s 8.62 square miles, each with their own distinct character and neighborhood association. Monterey’s neighborhoods feature a variety of offerings: multi-family housing and mixed-use projects, walkable to bodegas and business districts, beachfront neighborhood tracts, large suburban homes, and living among the Monterey pine forests.

The Monterey Regional Airport is located less than 10 minutes from historic Downtown Monterey, offering over 40 daily flights to Los Angeles, Dallas, Denver, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Portland, San Diego, Seattle, and points beyond.

The City of Monterey maintains and offers a variety of community amenities and services, including the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreational trail, over two miles of beaches, a harbor and marina, two wharves, the Monterey Sports Center with two indoor pools, the world-class Monterey Conference Center, California’s first public library, four community centers, 36 dedicated parks and open spaces, three fire stations, one police station, multiple parking facilities and garages, over 100 miles of public streets, the Veterans Park Campground, and El Encinal Cemetery.

Sea lion's view of Old Fisherman's Wharf.

Attachment 2 28
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 42, Packet Page 240 First incorporated in 1850 and with its present charter adopted in 1925, Monterey is a charter city and operates under the Council-Manager form of government. The Mayor and City Council are responsible for establishing policy and providing direction to the City Manager. The Mayor and City Council appoint the City Manager, who serves as the city government’s Chief Executive Officer, as well as the City Attorney, who serves as the City’s legal counsel. The Mayor and City Council are elected at-large and serve staggered four-year terms. The Mayor presides at City Council meetings.

The Monterey City Council meets the first and third Tuesday of each month at Few Memorial Hall of Records on the historic City Hall campus at Colton Hall. Council meetings are televised on Cable Channel 25, streamed live on monterey.org, and replayed at various times on both mediums.

The Monterey City government also takes pride in its level of community engagement and participation. The City boasts several boards and commissions including the Architectural Review Committee, Historic Preservation Commission, Board of Library Trustees, Measures P & S Oversight Committee, Museums and Cultural Arts Commission, Neighborhood and Capital Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee, Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission, and Appeals Boards. In addition to committee participation, the City of Monterey hosts a variety of Town Hall meetings and its representatives regularly participate in neighborhood and business association meetings.

Historic Brown-Underwood Adobe (1843), home to the Mayor,, City Council, and City Manager's Office on Monterey City Hall Campus.

Attachment 2 29
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 43, Packet Page 241 Services
Monterey is a full-service city, providing police,
fire, street operations and maintenance, sewer
and storm water utilities, planning, building
inspections, engineering, housing,
sustainability, facilities maintenance,
custodial services, parking, harbor and marina
operations, library, museums, parks, beaches,
campgrounds, urban forestry, sports center,
cemetery, and recreation services. Internal
services include city management, legal,
human resources, city clerk, information
technology, finance, and property
management.

The City provides some services to neighboring
communities and defense institutions under
contract, including fire, building maintenance, vehicle maintenance, and technology. These include Fire Services for the cities of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Pacific Grove, and Sand City and the Monterey Peninsula Airport District; Building Maintenance for the U.S. Army Garrison Presidio of Monterey and U.S. Army Signal Activity at Camp Roberts, and Information Technology networks that support the National Weather Service, California State Parks, Monterey-Salinas Transit, Monterey One Water, and other entities.

Other services, such as public education, water, wastewater processing, garbage collection and recycling, electric and gas utilities, cable, television, internet, and telephone, are not provided by the City.

Monterey is served by the Monterey-Salinas Transit District which operates buses and paratransit services seven days per week to Downtown Monterey, Cannery Row, New Monterey, and neighborhoods including Casanova Oak Knoll, Laguna Grande, Skyline Forest, Monterey Vista, La Mesa Village, Old Town, Laguna Grande, and Ryan Ranch. Monterey Regional Airport (MRY) is operated by the Monterey Peninsula Airport District, which operates 40 daily flights through private jet and commercial aircraft services from Alaska Airlines, United Airlines, American Airlines, Allegiant Air, and JSX.

The Monterey Police Department's historic police car and a Monterey Fire fire engine at the 4th of July parade in Downtown Monterey.

Attachment 2 30
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 44, Packet Page 242 History
The Native Rumsien people lived in Monterey for thousands of years before Euro-Americans landed on its shores. The Indigenous People who settled in what is now Monterey were drawn by the abundance offish and wildlife and other natural resources. The mild weather of the Central Coast, along with the bounty of the bay made this area an important part of the Rumsien life. Several of their village sites have been identified within the confines of Monterey.

Spanish explorer Juan Rodríguez Cabrillo is credited as the first EuroAmerican to see the bay on November 17, 1542, which he named La Bahia de los Pinos (Bay of Pines). Sixty years later, in December 1602, Sebastián Vizcaíno became the first European to set foot on the shores of the bay which he officially renamed "Monte Rey Bay", in honor of the Viceroy of New Spain who had ordered his expedition. Under a large oak tree overlooking the bay, near what is now Artillery and Pacific Streets, he and his crew of 200 celebrated mass in honor of their safe journey.

One hundred and sixty-eight years later, Franciscan Father Junípero Serra held mass on June 3, 1770 at the same location. Serra joined an expedition led by Captain Gaspar de Portolá to establish a Presidio at Monterey.

The Royal Presidio and Mission San Carlosde Borromeo de Monterey, were established as Monterey’s first buildings. A year later Father Serra moved the mission to Carmel, which offered a better agricultural and political environment. The Presidio remained in Monterey as the seat of government.

Rumsien people, Jose Cardero, ca. 1791,
Museo Naval de Madrid, Spain.

Royal Presidio Chapel, the oldest continuously
operating parish and the oldest stone building
in California. Photo by Lillie Grossman.

In 1776, Spain named Monterey as the capital of Baja (lower) and Alta (upper) California. That same year, Captain Juan Bautista de Anza arrived from Sonora with the first colonists for Spanish California; most of them bound for San Francisco. Monterey’s soldiers and their wives lived at the Royal Presidio (located where the San Carlos Cathedral now stands) and struggled to create a pueblo and raise families.

In 1818, in an effort to destroy Spain’s presence in California, Argentinean revolutionary privateer, Hipólito Bouchard attacked Monterey. After the only known land and sea battle fought on the West Coast.Bouchard sacked the town before departing. The damage from Bouchard’s raid was quickly repaired and during the next decade, residents began to expand outside the Royal Presidio, building homes, creating streets, and inaugurating businesses that would establish the foot-print of modern Monterey.

In April 1822, the people of Monterey learned that Mexico had won its Attachment 2 31
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 45, Packet Page 243 war for independence from Spain; California pledged allegiance to the Mexican Government. While Spain had discouraged foreigners to trade with California, Mexico opened the area to international trade. Monterey became California’s port of entry.

The Custom House was enlarged after 1827 to accommodate the expanding commercial activities in Monterey.

Originally started in 1814, the Custom House is considered the oldest public building in California.

In 1842, in response to the growing American presence in California, the United States established a consulate in Monterey. Thomas Larkin was appointed the first and only American Consul to California. His home, located at Pacific and Jefferson Street, is the origin for the architectural style renowned as "Monterey Colonial." In July 1846, during the Mexican-American War, Commodore John Drake Sloat’s Pacific squadron arrived in Monterey Bay. On July 7, his troops landed and raised the American flag, claiming California for the United States. This began a period of American occupation that lasted until 1848 when the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed, making all of Alta California part of the United States. This acquisition included the land now known as California, Utah, Nevada, parts of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming.

In Monterey, U.S. Navy Chaplain Walter Colton was appointed to serve as Monterey’s first American Alcalde, a position defined as Mayor and Judge, but which included many more duties. One of his many accomplishments was the design and supervision of the construction of Colton Hall, the first public building constructed under the American flag. Opened March 8, 1849, Colton Hall was originally built to serve as a public school and town meeting hall, but has proven to be much more.

In 1849, California’s military governor called for a constitutional convention to be held in Monterey’s Colton Hall.

On September 1, 48 delegates from ten districts arrived in Monterey to debate and write California’s first constitution. Unlike other states at the time, the California Constitution was bilingual, prohibited slavery, and afforded married women the right to hold separate property. The Constitution was ratified on October 13, voted on in November of that year and sent to Congress in January 1850. San José was chosen as the seat for the first Legislature. (The official definition of a State Capital is where the Legislature sits; therefore Monterey never was the State Capital.) On September 9, 1850, the U.S. Congress voted to admit California as the thirty-first state of the Union.

Reenactment of Sloat Landing of 1846 at Custom House Plaza Attachment 2 32
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 46, Packet Page 244 While awaiting word on Statehood, the state legislature formed counties and set up local governments as agreed on in the Constitution. Monterey served as the county seat until 1873, when Salinas took over that role.

Since Colton Hall was opened in 1849 it has served as the County headquarters, court house, a public school from 1873 to 1896, city offices, police courts, library, hospital, rationing office and today, as a museum. The building has been in public use since it opened, and is operated by the City of Monterey.

The City of Monterey was first incorporated in
1850. Monterey’s first residents were Native
Americans. Later, they were joined by Spanish
explorers, followed by Mexican settlers and
American pioneers, followed by Chinese,
Japanese, Portuguese, and Italian fishermen.

In 1850, Chinese fishing families crossed the
Pacific in junks and settled at Point Alones
("China Point"). They established Monterey's
first fishing industry, with over 600 Chinese
fisherman working in the area by 1853.

By the 1870s, the area became the largest,
most diverse Chinese settlement in the country. On May 16, 1906, a disastrous fire of suspicious origin swept through the Chinese settlement, destroying virtually every major structure.

Monterey became a thriving fishing community in the early to mid 1900s, exporting millions of pounds of abalone, shrimp, squid, and sardines annually. By the 1940s, Monterey was known as the “Sardine Capital of the World.” Before World War II, Sicilian and Japanese-American fisherman dominated the fishing industry, with the majority of fishing companies on Fisherman’s Wharf owned by Japanese- Americans.

Cannery Row, memorialized in John
Steinbeck’s book of the same name, was a
gathering place of diverse cultures. Sicilian
women, ranging in age from teens to middleaged, made up a third of cannery workers in the 1930s and 1940s. Mexican, Spanish,
Portuguese, Japanese, Chinese, and Dust
Bowl migrants also made up the workforce.

Today, a smaller commercial fishing fleet
continues to operate from Municipal Wharf
No. 2, which is managed by the City.

Chinese fishermen, Local History Collection, Monterey Public Library Women on packing line at sardine cannery, ca 1950, Local History Collection, Monterey Public Library
Attachment 2 33
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 47, Packet Page 245 Due to its strategic location, historically,
Monterey has been a key military outpost. In
1902, the 1st Squadron of the 9th Cavalry
arrived, 425 men who were among the first
black soliders to be stationed in California.

Known as the Buffalo Soldiers, they were
instrumental in building the Presidio of
Monterey. While military needs have changed
since the Presidio of Monterey was first
established, the presence of the Defense
Language Institute at the U.S. Army Garrison
Presidio of Monterey, the Naval Postgraduate
School and Fleet Numerical Meteorology and
Oceanography Center (FNMOC) at Naval
Support Activity Monterey, and U.S. Coast
Guard Station Monterey, all located within the
city limits, continues Monterey’s legacy of
military tradition.

Today, Monterey continues to boast a diverse cultural population which has earned it the designation of “Language Capital of the World”™ with the presence of both the Defense Language Institute and Middlebury Institute for International Studies at Monterey.

Buffalo Soldiers breaking in horses at camp near China Point, 1902.

Local History Collection, Monterey Public Library
State Historic Park Collection at Custom House Plaza
Attachment 2 34
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 48, Packet Page 246

BUDGETING PROCESS
& CALENDAR
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 35
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 49, Packet Page 247 Budgeting Process
The City’s fiscal year is July 1 through June 30.

To establish the budget, the Finance Department develops a plan for expenditure of projected available resources for the coming fiscal year. Labor costs are updated to reflect salary and benefit changes called for in union contracts, and estimates for unrepresented employees are also
updated. A five-year forecast outlines what resources, tax revenues, and other discretionary revenues may be
available to support operating requirements. Similarly, Capital Involvement Program priorities are matched with available funds from various funding sources.

A base budget is prepared from this information. This
base budget updates the costs of maintaining service
and staffing levels into the new budget year. The base
budget also includes the updated estimates of revenues
and other financing sources.

Proposed budget documents are prepared and transmitted to the Mayor and City Council prior to the budget presentation. The Mayor and Council review the proposed operating and capital improvement budget in public hearings. The budget is formally adopted by the vote of City Council on or before June 30 of each year. Any changes to the proposed budget, as considered and approved by the City Council during budget hearings, are included in the Approved Budget document.

Subsequent budget amendments throughout the fiscal year are submitted to Council for approval by resolution.

Funds may be transferred from one account to another with the approval of the City Manager or his designee.

Transfers to or from special funds, where state or federal regulations require council approval, and transfers from unappropriated reserves or fund balances, may only be made with the approval of City Council.

Double rainbow over Monterey Harbor
Budget Timeline
Attachment 2 36
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 50, Packet Page 248

BASIS OF BUDGETING
& FUND STRUCTURE
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 37
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 51, Packet Page 249 Basis of Budgeting
The City of Monterey uses a modified accrual basis of accounting in preparing the budget for governmental funds. This is consistent with the basis of accounting used for the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).

Under the modified accrual basis, revenues are recognized when measurable and available. The City considers all revenues reported in the governmental funds to be available if the revenues are collected within 60 days after fiscal year-end. Licenses, property taxes and taxpayer-assessed tax revenues (e.g., franchise taxes, sales taxes, motor vehicle fees, etc.), net of estimated refunds and uncollectible amounts, and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Revenue from grants, entitlements, and donations is recognized in the fiscal year in which all eligibility requirements have been satisfied.

Expenditures are recorded when the related fund liability is incurred, except for claims and judgments, compensated absences, which are recognized as expenditures to the extent they have matured, and principal and interest on general long-term debt.

The City’s accounts are organized and operated on a fund basis. A fund is an independent fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts recording assets, liabilities, fund balances, revenues, and expenditures.

The City has the following fund type categories:

Governmental Fund Types
The governmental funds include the General, Capital Projects, Debt Service, and Special Revenue Funds.

Governmental Funds are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting.

Attachment 2 38
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 52, Packet Page 250 General Fund (101)
This is the only major fund in the structure of
the FY21 and FY22 budgets. It is the primary
operating fund of the City. It is used to account
for all financial resources except those required
to be accounted for in another fund. The major
revenue sources of this fund include transient
occupancy tax, property tax, sales tax, business
license tax, utility user’s tax and charges for
services. These revenues support the general
operations of the City, which include police,
fire, street maintenance, parks, recreation,
planning and general government. In addition,
the General Fund finances many capital
improvements each year.

Sewer Mains Improvements (205)
These funds were instituted in 1971 to pay for improvements made to the sewer mains system in various areas throughout the City, which are required as a result of development.

Wharf I Sprinkler System Fund (210)
This fund was established in 1994-95 to account for revenues and expenses associated with the maintenance and upkeep of the fire sprinkler system at Wharf 1.

Skyline Forest Service District (215)
This district was created in 1966 to provide for perpetual landscaping maintenance of the Skyline Forest area.

The tax is levied on the properties in the district to pay for the landscape contract.

Neighborhood Improvement Fund (216)
This fund was established to provide a means for financing neighborhood related capital improvements. Under a Charter Amendment in 1988, 16% of all transient occupancy tax revenue collected by the City is deposited into this fund. These funds are budgeted through the City’s annual Capital Improvement Program budget.

Grant Revenue Funds (240-250)
These funds are established to account for grant funds received from Federal and State agencies that are earmarked for specific purposes such as personnel cost for a School Resource Officer or Domestic Violence Office. Some grants allow for the purchase and acquisition of certain safety equipment used in public safety operations.

Gas Tax Fund (251)
These funds are comprised of state and federal monies made available to the City for general road improvements and for specific road projects.

Parks Staff working at Dennis the Menace Playground.

Attachment 2 39
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 53, Packet Page 251 Street Infrastructure Rehab Fund (Measure P and S) (252) This fund was created in April 2015 to account for all sales and use tax revenue from Measure P. The purpose of Measure P is to fund street infrastructure rehabilitation projects. Measure S extended this tax for 8 more years after passage in November 2018.

Conference Center Facilities District Fund (253 and 254) This fund was established to account for Conference Center Facilities District tax revenue and bond proceeds used to fund the renovation of the Monterey Conference Center.

Construction Truck Impact Fees Fund (255)
This fund was established to account for fees collected, based on building permit project valuations, to provide for reconstruction and resurfacing of City streets impacted by construction truck traffic. Fees were discontinued on July 2, 2013, and the remaining funds are dedicated to completion of existing capital projects.

Transportation Safety & Investment Plan Fund (257)
This fund was established to capture Measure X (TAMC sales tax) revenues and expenditures.

Alvarado Street Maintenance District (261)
This district was formed to help pay for the maintenance and upkeep of Alvarado Street. A special assessment is levied on all parcels within the district for this specific purpose.

Calle Principal Street Maintenance District (262)
This district was formed to help pay for the maintenance and upkeep of Calle Principal. A special assessment is levied on all parcels within the district for this specific purpose.

Parking Adjustments Funds (264, 266, 267)
These funds are repository for parking adjustment fees collected within each of three parking districts within the City. Fees are assessed if a property owner wishes to develop or redevelop property in such a manner that will intensify the need for parking but is unable to provide all of the parking required by the zoning ordinance. Parking adjustment fees are used for construction, operation, and maintenance of common public parking facilities.

Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (268)
This fund was created on February 1, 2012 to account for transfers from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund upon elimination of redevelopment. This fund administers the remaining low interest loans issued under the previous Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund, and manages affordable housing opportunities.

Housing & Community Development Funds (270, 274, 275, 276, 278) These funds are used to assist families and individuals in low and moderate income neighborhoods in obtaining low interest loans for the purpose of purchasing, rehabilitating, and renting housing. The sources of funds include CDBG, HOME funds, tax increments, rental and interest income.

Parking Staff working at the Wharf Lot.

Attachment 2 40
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 54, Packet Page 252 Park Dedication Funds (277)
In 1974, an ordinance established regulations for the dedication of land and the payment of fees for park and recreational land in subdivisions and multiple family developments. These funds account for and control payment of fees and uses of fees for specific park and recreational purposes as prescribed by the ordinance.

Sewer Line Maintenance Fund (279)
In 1978, the City passed and adopted an ordinance to establish a sewer line maintenance fee. The fee was imposed to provide revenue to support the cost of operating and maintaining the City's sewer system.

Storm Water Utility Fund (280)
This fund was established in FY 1994-95 in order to account for the revenues and expenses in connection with the operation and maintenance of the City's storm drain and storm water management system. The fee is collected by the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency as an add-on to the sewer maintenance charge.

Integrated Regional Watershed Management (281)
This fund accounts for revenues received from a Prop 50 Integrated Regional Watershed Management grant to fund a feasibility study to analyze the various alternatives for mitigating the effects of storm water runoff into the ocean at several areas around the Peninsula.

Water System Improvement Fund (290)
This fund was established in 1983 to accrue
developer fees for the construction of
improvements to the fire hydrant system.

Public Safety Training & Services Fund (291)
This fund is used to account for revenues
received from the Monterey County CSA74
fund for emergency medical services (EMS)
training and equipment support.

Asset Seizure Fund (292)
This fund is a repository for funds received
from the sale of assets seized by the Police
Department.

Public Education & Government Access Fund (298)
Established in 2001, this fund accounts for revenues and expenses related to supporting a local non-profit media agency known as Access Monterey Peninsula.

Fire Department offshore emergency response drill by Fisherman's Wharf.

Attachment 2 41
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 55, Packet Page 253 Senior Center Programs Fund (299)
This fund was established in accordance with a bequest that specifically supports new and/or existing programs at the Senior Community Center.

Debt Service Fund (310)
This fund is used to account for the financial resources to be used for the payment of principal and interest on long-term obligations.

Capital Projects Fund (410)
This fund is used to account for financial
resources to be used for the acquisition,
construction, additions or improvements to
buildings and land purchases.

Tidelands Trust Fund (807)
This fund was established, as prescribed by
the State of California, to account for all
revenues and expenditures within the
tidelands area of the City.

Library Trust Fund (810)
This fund was created so that gifts,
bequests and miscellaneous revenues
from the library operation could be
deposited and reserved for library purposes.

All expenditures from the fund are requested
by the Library Board of Trustees and approved
by the City Council.

Museum Trust Fund (818)
This fund is comprised of donations from
visitors to the Colton Hall Museum and
contributions by individual donors. The
monies are used for the acquisition and
preservation of historical artifacts.

Doc Ricketts Lab on Cannery Row, California History Room - Monterey Public Library, Ed Ricketts Jr.

Attachment 2 42
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 56, Packet Page 254 Scholze Park Trust Funds (821 & 822)
These permanent funds were created for the purpose of maintaining and improving parks and playgrounds owned by the City. It is specified by ordinance that only the interest earnings from the assets be distributed and divided 50% for park and 50% for playground purposes.

Golden Travelers Trust Fund (961)
The Recreation department administers a program whereby cultural related day-trips and weeklong excursions are provided to participants on a fee basis. This fund accounts for the revenues and expenditures of the program.

Proprietary Fund Types
The proprietary funds, which include the Enterprise and Internal Service Funds, are used to account for the City's business-type activities. Proprietary funds are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the full accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned, and expenses are recorded at the time liabilities are incurred, regardless of when the related cash flows take place.

Enterprise Fund
Enterprise funds are used to account for operations (a) that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises - where the intent of the governing body is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods and services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges; or (b) where the governing body has decided that periodic determination of revenue earned, expenses incurred, and/or net income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability, or other purposes. The City of Monterey has seven enterprise funds:

Marina Fund (600): created in 1960 to account for all Marina related revenues and expenditures. All revenues collected in the Marina area are used for operation, maintenance, and improvements to the Marina.

Cemetery Fund (610): all cemetery related revenues and expenditures are accounted for in this fund.

Parking Fund (625 : established to pay for construction, operation, and maintenance of parking facilities and improvements. The revenue sources include parking fees, permits and fines.

Materials Recovery Fund (640 & 641) : funds were established to account for the revenues, leases payments and debt service for the Materials Recovery Facility.

Presidio of Monterey Public Works Fund (650): created in 1999 to account for costs and revenues pertaining to the Presidio of Monterey maintenance contract.

Navy Services Fund (655): established to account for costs and revenues pertaining to the Navy ervices contract.

Institutional Network Fund (660): established to account for costs and revenues pertaining to the Institutional Network Agreement contracted with AT&T, in operating a communication network for educational institutions, City buildings and agencies, and other entities.

Attachment 2 43
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 57, Packet Page 255 Internal Service Fund
The internal service fund is used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department to other departments of the City on a cost-reimbursement basis. The City has four internal service funds:

Equipment Replacement Fund (705): fund serves to centrally account for the new or replacement costs for all vehicle apparatus, and heavy equipment assets. The cost of this service is charged back to the operating departments.

Vehicle Maintenance Fund (708): this fund serves to centrally account for the costs of maintenance operations for all vehicle apparatus, and heavy equipment assets. The cost of this service is charged back to the operating departments.

Information Services Fund (710): this fund centralizes data processing and other information services costs. The user departments are assessed a charge for these services and to accumulate funds for equipment replacement and enhancements as needed.

Workers’ Comp Insurance Trust Fund (715): this group of funds captures the costs and revenues for our self-insurance program, including liability and benefits. The operating departments are charged for the cost of insurance as well as for the accumulation of requisite reserve funds.

Liability & Property Insurance Fund (716): this fund captures the costs and revenues for our selfinsurance program, including liability and property. The operating departments are charged for the cost of insurance as well as for the accumulation of requisite reserve funds.

Health Insurance Trust Fund (718): this group of funds captures the costs and revenues for our selfinsurance programs related to employee health and welfare, e.g. Vision, Dental, PERs Health, Administrative costs, and consultants. The operating departments are charged for the cost of insurance as well as for the accumulation of requisite reserve funds.

Fiduciary Fund Types
The Fiduciary Funds account for assets held by the City in trust or as an agent for various assessment and community facilities districts. The City maintains two types of fiduciary funds: agency funds and a private purpose trust fund.

Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund (314) : This private purpose trust fund was established to account for assets held by the Redevelopment Successor Agency pending distribution to the appropriate taxing entities after the payment of enforceable
Assessment District Funds (642, 917-959) : These agency funds were established to account for funds when the City is acting as an agent. It consists of the following various assessment districts located within the City; Conference Center Facilities District, Ocean View Plaza Community Services District, Monterey Convention Visitor’s Bureau Tourism Business Improvement District, New Monterey Business Improvement, Downtown Promotion and the Wharf Promotion Districts.

Attachment 2 44
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 58, Packet Page 256

COMBINED

STATEMENTS
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 45
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 59, Packet Page 257 2022-23 COMBINED STATEMENTS
FY2022/23 General Fund Special Debt Service Permanent Enterprise Internal Services Agency Grand Total Sources of Funds
Property Taxes $ 13,630,482 $ 28,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 13,658,482 Sales Tax 15,248,718 11,289,000 - - - - - 26,537,718
Conf Ctr Facilities Dist Tax - - 4,861,830 - - - - 4,861,830 Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) 26,040,000 4,960,000 - - - - - 31,000,000 Business License 3,865,531 - - - - - - 3,865,531
Utility Users Taxes 4,130,453 - - - - - - 4,130,453
Franchise Fees 2,630,914 - - - - - - 2,630,914
Other Taxes 516,509 800,731 - - - - - 1,317,240
License & Permits 1,706,323 - - - 748,000 - - 2,454,323 Fines & Forfeitures 203,070 - - - 1,050,000 - - 1,253,070 Intergovernmental 197,013 1,991,725 - - 125,000 - - 2,313,738 Interest 404,703 609,281 39,091 - 105,085 - - 1,158,160 Rents 2,302,453 3,024,741 - - 559,325 - - 5,886,519
Fees & Charges 16,470,764 4,555,949 - - 24,352,670 30,321,259 - 75,700,642 Other Revenues 1,507,848 895,490 - - 9,003,000 127,025 7,000 11,540,363 Transfers In - - - - - - - -
Total Sources $ 88,854,781 $ 28,154,917 $ 4,900,921 $ - $ 35,943,080 $ 30,448,284 $ 7,000 $ 188,308,983 -88,854,781 -28,154,917 -4,900,921 -35,943,080 -30,448,284 -7000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
General Fund Special Debt Service Permanent Enterprise Internal Services Agency Grand Total Uses of Funds
Salaries/Benefits $ 66,605,815 $ 4,321,619 $ - $ - $ 14,517,507 $ 4,174,364 $ - $ 89,619,305 Services/Supplies 11,252,092 2,512,900 - 7,415,520 16,924,865 - 38,105,377 Capital Outlay 413,900 116,000 - 230,000 3,262,221 - 4,022,121 Debt Services 123,444 886,380 4,125,539 330,345 349,719 - 5,815,427 Internal Service Charges 10,570,884 2,308,993 28,154 - 3,698,172 895,346 7,800 17,509,349 Transfers Out - - - - - - - -
Capital Improvement Program - 998,419 - - - - 998,419
Total Uses $ 88,966,135 $ 11,144,311 $ 4,153,693 $ - $ 26,191,544 $ 25,606,515 $ 7,800 $ 156,069,998 NET SOURCE/(USE) OF FUNDS $ (111,354) $ 17,010,606 $ 747,228 $ - $ 9,751,536 $ 4,841,769 $ (800) $ 32,238,985 Types of Funds
Types of Funds
Attachment 2 46
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 60, Packet Page 258 FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET

REVENUES
Attachment 2 47
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 61, Packet Page 259 SUMMARY OF REVENUES BY FUND (excludes transfers-in)
Fund Title
FY19/20
Actual
FY20/21
Actual
FY21/22
Adopted
FY21/22
Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
101 GENERAL FUND $71,368,947 67,424,460 79,019,196 87,421,684 88,854,781 205 SEWER MAINS FUND 28,436 5,862 12,213 12,213 12,213
210 WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND 39,876 40,319 80,000 80,000 40,500 215 SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST 33,267 29,907 26,953 26,953 29,953 216 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND 3,313,858 2,527,075 3,385,831 3,919,831 5,000,949 241 FEDERAL/STATE PROJECTS FUND 120,516 73,122 - - -
249 STATE COPS - AB1913 (DVO) 157,488 157,960 100,524 100,524 161,809 251 GAS TAX FUND 648,580 608,894 709,827 709,827 808,606 252 STREET INFRASTRUCTURE REHAB FUND (Measure S & P) 9,192,630 8,668,682 9,232,053 11,044,113 11,332,148 253 CCFD BONDS - PROJECT FUND (672) 290 155 155 155
254 CCFD-CITY REVENUE FUND 49,617 9,225 13,157 13,157 13,157 257

TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & INVESTMENT PLAN
(Measure X) 1,346,679 1,076,338 921,424 921,424 1,399,664 258 SB1 ROAD MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION 468,597 541,172 568,214 568,214 659,165 261 ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT 47,119 49,427 48,827 48,827 48,827 262 CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT 24,574 29,152 27,756 27,756 27,756 263 S CANNERY ROW PARKING DISTRICT 16 (10) - - -
264 PARKING ADJUSTMENT FEE-FUND A 3,634 3,643 16 16 3,606 266 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT FUND 13,314 13,522 27,046 27,046 13,546 267 CANNERY ROW PARKING VARIANCES 1,538 2,151 3,315 3,315 1,815 268 LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND 196,657 620,858 592,646 592,646 578,646 269 EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM - 523,899 - - - 270 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND 1,069,609 1,445,429 1,161,777 1,161,777 1,327,448 274 HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRALLA 97,571 83,572 86,655 86,655 88,055 277 PARK DEDICATION FEES FUND 1,116 67 451 451 451
278 HOME GRANT 2005 FUND 11,534 2,537 7,121 7,121 3,121 279 SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND 1,244,866 3,958,067 2,356,055 2,356,055 2,526,055 280 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 477,637 1,872,994 1,054,040 1,054,040 1,104,240 281 INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 648 150 185 185 185 290 WATER SYSTEM IMPROV FUND 11,535 2,676 3,293 3,293 3,293 291 PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS 173,517 119,174 55,000 55,000 60,000 292 ASSET SEIZURE FUND - 20,845 1,000 1,000 5,000
295 FEMA FUND 18,042 - - - -
298 PUBLIC EDUC & GOV ACCESS (PEG) 30 77 - - -
299 SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND 1,565 361 445 445 445 310 DEBT SERVICE FUND 7,045 7,142 4,091 4,091 4,091
314 RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND 2,498 462 677 677 677 404 STATE LOAN 66,139 (66,366) - - -
405 CIP - STATE FUNDING SOURCE 1,074,899 125,488 - - -
406 FEDERAL STIMULUS PROJECTS 1,579,442 8,788 - - -
407 CIP - OTHER FUNDING SOURCE 562,835 5,580 - - -
408 CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION 27,320 6,413 - - -
410 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND - - - - -
470 SPORTS CENTER EXPANSION FUND 3,190,526 100 - - -
600 MARINA FUND 291,601 4,784,392 3,108,411 3,108,411 3,252,461 610 CEMETERY FUND 7,673,027 242,324 265,508 265,508 291,508 625 PARKING FUND 2,080 6,134,665 8,396,009 8,396,009 11,211,909 641 MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY - 291 560 560 560
642 OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD - - 7,000 7,000 7,000
650 PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS 17,608,281 17,700,571 22,517,597 24,486,422 20,832,592 655 NAVY SERVICES FUND 266,310 263,079 354,050 354,050 354,050 705 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,349,158 488,964 1,111,807 1,111,807 1,197,686 708 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 2,037,299 2,175,310 2,423,548 2,519,512 2,671,610 710 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 4,495,663 3,898,754 4,366,103 4,366,103 7,374,496 715 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST 4,013,215 4,245,450 3,716,991 3,716,991 3,999,715 716 LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE 1,956,762 2,741,323 3,161,530 3,161,530 3,833,620 718 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND 9,406,672 8,025,626 10,258,879 10,258,879 10,738,657 807 TIDELANDS TRUST FUND 2,853,832 2,852,979 2,804,422 2,804,422 2,692,932 810 LIBRARY TRUST FUND 295,427 230,450 5,400 103,500 169,300 818 MUSEUM TRUST FUND 15,811 2,993 3,004 3,004 11,200
821 SCHOLZE PARK TRUST FUND 41,265 28,774 11,678 11,678 15,000 Attachment 2 48
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 62, Packet Page 260 SUMMARY OF REVENUES BY FUND (excludes transfers-in)
Fund Title
FY19/20
Actual
FY20/21
Actual
FY21/22
Adopted
FY21/22
Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
822 SCHOLZE PLAYGROUND TRUST FUND 41,265 8,941 11,666 11,666 15,000 900 SPECIAL DEPOSITS FUND 1,936 1,351 - - -
918 CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1 3,767,231 2,414,361 2,855,745 2,855,745 4,896,830 961 GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND 19,960 - - - -
TOTAL $ 152,809,834 $ 146,240,101 $ 164,879,852 $ 177,791,289 $ 187,676,483 Attachment 2 49
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 63, Packet Page 261 SUMMARY OF REVENUES BY TYPE (excludes Transfers-In)
Title FY19/20 Actual FY20/21 Actual
FY21/22
Adopted FY21/22 Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
Fund 101 -- GENERAL FUND
PROPERTY TAXES 12,135,312 13,267,772 12,990,419 12,990,419 13,630,482 SALES TAX 9,044,694 10,594,210 11,652,785 14,411,031 15,248,718 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES 22,405,070 12,909,693 17,560,632 20,364,132 26,040,000 BUSINESS LICENSE 3,834,852 3,450,914 3,451,367 3,451,367 3,865,531 UTILITY USERS TAXES 3,603,923 3,654,753 3,614,736 3,614,736 4,130,453 FRANCHISE FEES 1,738,233 1,988,129 2,331,103 2,541,103 2,630,914 OTHER TAXES 494,650 572,210 492,727 492,727 516,509
LICENSES & PERMITS 1,676,985 1,771,564 1,226,715 1,300,715 1,706,323 FINES & FORFEITURES 206,867 221,793 210,000 230,500 203,070 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,447,181 2,560,877 7,739,692 9,413,728 197,013 INTEREST 1,611,607 785,739 786,404 450,255 404,703
RENTS 2,484,493 2,264,960 2,376,075 2,376,075 2,302,453 FEES & CHARGES 18,741,896 13,037,150 13,447,635 13,877,352 16,470,764 OTHER REVENUES 1,190,518 344,697 1,138,906 1,907,544 1,507,848 Total 101 -- GENERAL FUND 80,616,281 67,424,460 79,019,196 87,421,684 88,854,781 Fund 205 -- SEWER MAINS FUND
INTEREST 22,834 5,862 7,213 7,213 7,213
FEES & CHARGES 32,822 - 5,000 5,000 5,000
Total 205 -- SEWER MAINS FUND 55,656 5,862 12,213 12,213 12,213 Fund 210 -- WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND
FEES & CHARGES 38,342 40,319 80,000 80,000 40,500
Total 210 -- WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND 38,342 40,319 80,000 80,000 40,500 Fund 215 -- SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST
PROPERTY TAXES 25,325 28,213 25,000 25,000 28,000
INTEREST 5,900 1,695 1,953 1,953 1,953
Total 215 -- SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST 31,225 29,907 26,953 26,953 29,953 Fund 216 -- NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES 4,267,634 2,459,538 3,344,882 3,878,882 4,960,000 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,960 - - 0
INTEREST 188,221 65,577 40,949 40,949 40,949
TRANSFERS IN - - - 0
Total 216 -- NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND 4,455,855 2,527,075 3,385,831 3,919,831 5,000,949 Fund 241 -- FEDERAL/STATE PROJECTS FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL - 73,122 - - -
Total 241 -- FEDERAL/STATE PROJECTS FUND - 73,122 - - - Fund 249 -- STATE COPS - AB1913 (DVO)
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 157,080 156,727 100,000 100,000 161,285 INTEREST 1,451 1,234 524 524 524
Total 249 -- STATE COPS - AB1913 (DVO) 158,531 157,960 100,524 100,524 161,809 Fund 251 -- GAS TAX FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 556,080 596,139 701,952 701,952 800,731 INTEREST 30,924 12,755 7,875 7,875 7,875

OTHER REVENUES - - - - -
Total 251 -- GAS TAX FUND 587,004 608,894 709,827 709,827 808,606 Fund 252 -- STREET INFRASTRUCTURE REHAB FUND (MEASURE P & S) SALES TAX 10,212,984 8,643,025 9,188,905 11,000,965 11,289,000 INTEREST 268,190 25,656 43,148 43,148 43,148
Total 252 -- STREET INFRASTRUCTURE REHAB FUND (MEAS 10,481,175 8,668,682 9,232,053 11,044,113 11,332,148 Fund 253 -- CCFD BONDS - PROJECT FUND
INTEREST - 290 155 155 155
Total 253 -- CCFD BONDS - PROJECT FUND - 290 155 155 155 Fund 254 -- CCFD-CITY REVENUE FUND
INTEREST - 9,225 13,157 13,157 13,157
Total 254 -- CCFD-CITY REVENUE FUND - 9,225 13,157 13,157 13,157 Fund 257 -- TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & INVESTMENT PLAN (MEASURE X) INTERGOVERNMENTAL 823,557 1,035,331 900,000 900,000 1,378,240 INTEREST 19,339 41,007 21,424 21,424 21,424
Total 257 -- TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & INVESTMENT PLA 842,896 1,076,338 921,424 921,424 1,399,664 Fund 258 -- SB1 ROAD MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 519,393 517,737 556,007 556,007 646,958 INTEREST 5,773 23,435 12,207 12,207 12,207
Total 258 -- SB1 ROAD MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION 525,165 541,172 568,214 568,214 659,165 Fund 261 -- ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT
OTHER TAXES 48,390 48,976 48,500 48,500 48,500
Attachment 2 50
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 64, Packet Page 262 SUMMARY OF REVENUES BY TYPE (excludes Transfers-In)
Title FY19/20 Actual FY20/21 Actual
FY21/22
Adopted FY21/22 Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
INTEREST 1,972 450 327 327 327
Total 261 -- ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT 50,361 49,427 48,827 48,827 48,827 Fund 262 -- CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT
OTHER TAXES 23,531 28,901 27,500 27,500 27,500
INTEREST 1,499 251 256 256 256
Total 262 -- CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT 25,030 29,152 27,756 27,756 27,756 Fund 263 -- S CANNERY ROW PARKING DISTRICT
INTEREST - (10) - - -
Total 263 -- S CANNERY ROW PARKING DISTRICT - (10) - - - Fund 264 -- PARKING ADJUSTMENT FEE-FUND A
INTEREST 117 53 16 16 16
FEES & CHARGES 3,590 3,590 - - 3590
Total 264 -- PARKING ADJUSTMENT FEE-FUND A 3,707 3,643 16 16 3,606 Fund 266 -- TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT FUND
INTEREST 357 277 46 46 46
FEES & CHARGES 14,445 13,245 27,000 27,000 13,500
Total 266 -- TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT FUND 14,802 13,522 27,046 27,046 13,546 Fund 267 -- CANNERY ROW PARKING VARIANCES
INTEREST 92 51 15 15 15
FEES & CHARGES 1,800 2,100 3,300 3,300 1,800
Total 267 -- CANNERY ROW PARKING VARIANCES 1,892 2,151 3,315 3,315 1,815 Fund 268 -- LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND
INTEREST 93,321 492,068 117,646 117,646 7,646
RENTS 55,565 93,849 75,000 75,000 79,000
OTHER REVENUES 12,709 34,941 400,000 400,000 492,000
Total 268 -- LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND 161,594 620,858 592,646 592,646 578,646 Fund 269 -- EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
INTERGOVERNMENTAL - 523,899 - - -
Total 269 -- EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM - 523,899 - - - Fund 270 -- COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 213,693 850,544 259,829 259,829 250,000 INTEREST 62,976 180,393 55,023 55,023 151,948
RENTS 508,579 412,926 446,925 446,925 425,000
OTHER REVENUES -9 1,566 400,000 400,000 500,500
Total 270 -- COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND 785,239 1,445,429 1,161,777 1,161,777 1,327,448 Fund 274 -- HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRALLA
INTEREST 5,124 2,064 1,655 1,655 1,655
RENTS 86,185 78,556 85,000 85,000 84,000
OTHER REVENUES 1,171 2,952 - - 2400
Total 274 -- HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRALL 92,480 83,572 86,655 86,655 88,055 Fund 277 -- PARK DEDICATION FEES FUND
INTEREST 3,107 67 451 451 451
FEES & CHARGES 36,309
Total 277 -- PARK DEDICATION FEES FUND 39,416 67 451 451 451 Fund 278 -- HOME GRANT 2005 FUND
INTEREST 11,919 2,537 7,121 7,121 3,121
Total 278 -- HOME GRANT 2005 FUND 11,919 2,537 7,121 7,121 3,121 Fund 279 -- SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND
INTEREST 207,365 48,486 51,055 51,055 51,055
FEES & CHARGES 2,435,068 3,909,581 2,305,000 2,305,000 2,475,000 Total 279 -- SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND 2,642,433 3,958,067 2,356,055 2,356,055 2,526,055 Fund 280 -- STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
INTEREST 30,258 7,080 5,540 5,540 5,540
FEES & CHARGES 998,036 1,686,995 1,003,000 1,003,000 1,098,200 OTHER REVENUES 21,007 178,919 45,500 45,500 500
Total 280 -- STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 1,049,301 1,872,994 1,054,040 1,054,040 1,104,240 Fund 281 -- INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
INTEREST 604 150 185 185 185
Total 281 -- INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATERSHED MANAGE 604 150 185 185 185 Fund 290 -- WATER SYSTEM IMPROV FUND
INTEREST 10,764 2,676 3,293 3,293 3,293
Total 290 -- WATER SYSTEM IMPROV FUND 10,764 2,676 3,293 3,293 3,293 Fund 291 -- PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 67,439 98,778 40,000 40,000 40,000
FEES & CHARGES 50,161 20,395 15,000 15,000 20,000
Attachment 2 51
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 65, Packet Page 263 SUMMARY OF REVENUES BY TYPE (excludes Transfers-In)
Title FY19/20 Actual FY20/21 Actual
FY21/22
Adopted FY21/22 Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
Total 291 -- PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS 117,599 119,174 55,000 55,000 60,000 Fund 292 -- ASSET SEIZURE FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 399,141 20,845 1,000 1,000 5,000.00
Total 292 -- ASSET SEIZURE FUND 399,141 20,845 1,000 1,000 5,000 Fund 295 -- FEMA FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 30 - - - -
Total 295 -- FEMA FUND 30 - - - -
Fund 298 -- PUBLIC EDUC & GOV ACCESS (PEG)
INTEREST 2,168 77 - - -
Total 298 -- PUBLIC EDUC & GOV ACCESS (PEG) 2,168 77 - - - Fund 299 -- SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND
INTEREST 6,541 361 445 445 445
Total 299 -- SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND 6,541 361 445 445 445 Fund 310 -- DEBT SERVICE FUND
INTEREST 2,496 7,142 4,091 4,091 4091
Total 310 -- DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,496 7,142 4,091 4,091 4,091 Fund 314 -- RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND
INTEREST - 462 677 677 677
Total 314 -- RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND - 462 677 677 677 Fund 404 -- STATE LOAN
INTEREST 628 (66,366) - - -
Total 404 -- STATE LOAN 628 (66,366) - - -
Fund 405 -- CIP - STATE FUNDING SOURCE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,687,808 125,488 - - -
Total 405 -- CIP - STATE FUNDING SOURCE 1,687,808 125,488 - - - Fund 406 -- FEDERAL STIMULUS PROJECTS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,746,121 8,788 - - -
Total 406 -- FEDERAL STIMULUS PROJECTS 1,746,121 8,788 - - - Fund 407 -- CIP - OTHER FUNDING SOURCE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 860,346 5,580 - - -
Total 407 -- CIP - OTHER FUNDING SOURCE 860,346 5,580 - - - Fund 408 -- CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION
INTEREST 37,761 6,413 - - -
Total 408 -- CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION 37,761 6,413 - - - Fund 410 -- CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND

INTERGOVERNMENTAL - - - - -

TRANSFERS IN - - - - -
Total 410 -- CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND - - - - -
Fund 425 -- HIGHWAY 68 IMPROVEMENTS FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL (125,000) - - - -
Total 425 -- HIGHWAY 68 IMPROVEMENTS FUND (125,000) - - - - Fund 470 -- SPORTS CENTER EXPANSION FUND
OTHER REVENUES - 100 - - -
Total 470 -- SPORTS CENTER EXPANSION FUND - 100 - - -
Fund 600 -- MARINA FUND
LICENSES & PERMITS 48,920 47,721 44,000 44,000 48,000
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 7,018 - 25,000 25,000 25,000
INTEREST 172,431 51,004 59,811 59,811 59,811
RENTS 398,605 248,870 250,000 250,000 259,325
FEES & CHARGES 2,760,617 2,751,501 2,695,000 2,695,000 2,824,525 OTHER REVENUES 35,905 1,685,295 34,600 34,600 35,800
Total 600 -- MARINA FUND 3,423,497 4,784,392 3,108,411 3,108,411 3,252,461 Fund 610 -- CEMETERY FUND
INTEREST 9,203 (4,203) 508 508 508
FEES & CHARGES 269,233 247,693 245,000 245,000 266,000
OTHER REVENUES 36,211 (1,166) 20,000 20,000 25,000
Total 610 -- CEMETERY FUND 314,647 242,324 265,508 265,508 291,508 Fund 625 -- PARKING FUND
LICENSES & PERMITS 681,694 530,544 512,000 512,000 700,000 FINES & FORFEITURES 808,508 1,048,460 782,600 782,600 1,050,000 INTEREST 439,912 (17,982) 39,184 39,184 39,184
RENTS 421,016 399,665 332,000 332,000 300,000
FEES & CHARGES 7,859,011 4,169,164 6,609,325 6,609,325 8,971,025 OTHER REVENUES 140,451 4,814 120,900 120,900 151,700
Total 625 -- PARKING FUND 10,350,593 6,134,665 8,396,009 8,396,009 11,211,909 Attachment 2 52
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 66, Packet Page 264 SUMMARY OF REVENUES BY TYPE (excludes Transfers-In)
Title FY19/20 Actual FY20/21 Actual
FY21/22
Adopted FY21/22 Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
Fund 641 -- MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY
INTEREST - 291 560 560 560
Total 641 -- MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY - 291 560 560 560 Fund 642 -- OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD
OTHER REVENUES -10,764 - 7,000 7,000 7,000
Total 642 -- OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD -10,764 - 7,000 7,000 7,000 Fund 650 -- PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS
INTEREST 7,619 5,022 5,022 5,022
FEES & CHARGES 9,532,386 11,423,114 11,568,492 11,568,492 11,937,070 OTHER REVENUES 2,948,769 6,269,838 10,944,083 12,912,908 8,890,500 Total 650 -- PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS 12,481,155 17,700,571 22,517,597 24,486,422 20,832,592 Fund 655 -- NAVY SERVICES FUND
INTEREST (1,368) - -
FEES & CHARGES 280,625 264,447 354,050 354,050 354,050
Total 655 -- NAVY SERVICES FUND 280,625 263,079 354,050 354,050 354,050 Fund 705 -- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
INTEREST 48,892.05 (39,671) - - -
FEES & CHARGES 1,061,872.76 435,459 1,111,807 1,111,807 1,197,686 OTHER REVENUES 9,670.11 93,177 - - -
Total 705 -- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,120,435 488,964 1,111,807 1,111,807 1,197,686 Fund 708 -- VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
FEES & CHARGES 2,128,140 2,175,310 2,332,298 2,428,262 2,670,360 OTHER REVENUES - - 91,250 91,250 1,250
Total 708 -- VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 2,128,140 2,175,310 2,423,548 2,519,512 2,671,610 Fund 710 -- INFORMATION SERVICES FUND
FEES & CHARGES 4,003,475 3,898,754 4,366,103 4,366,103 7,374,496 Total 710 -- INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 4,003,475 3,898,754 4,366,103 4,366,103 7,374,496 Fund 715 -- WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST
FEES & CHARGES 2,834,328 3,496,140 3,651,991 3,651,991 3,934,715 OTHER REVENUES 79,753 749,310 65,000 65,000 65,000
Total 715 -- WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST 2,914,081 4,245,450 3,716,991 3,716,991 3,999,715 Fund 716 -- LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE
FEES & CHARGES 1,239,739 2,466,074 3,161,530 3,161,530 3,783,620 OTHER REVENUES -291,809 275,249 - - 50,000
Total 716 -- LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE 947,930 2,741,323 3,161,530 3,161,530 3,833,620 Fund 718 -- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND
FEES & CHARGES 9,246,732 8,025,626 10,258,879 10,258,879 10,738,657 OTHER REVENUES 2,688
Total 718 -- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND 9,249,421 8,025,626 10,258,879 10,258,879 10,738,657 Fund 807 -- TIDELANDS TRUST FUND
INTEREST 212,546 21,781 42,374 42,374 45,000
RENTS 2,895,139 2,642,082 2,446,137 2,446,137 2,436,741 FEES & CHARGES 247,731 189,116 315,911 315,911 211,191
OTHER REVENUES 14,398 - - -
Total 807 -- TIDELANDS TRUST FUND 3,369,813 2,852,979 2,804,422 2,804,422 2,692,932 Fund 810 -- LIBRARY TRUST FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 6,000 - - - 79,200
INTEREST 13,588 4,830 5,400 5,400 6,000
FEES & CHARGES 7,487 30 - 2,100 3,100
OTHER REVENUES 106,919 225,590 - 96,000 81,000
Total 810 -- LIBRARY TRUST FUND 133,994 230,450 5,400 103,500 169,300 Fund 818 -- MUSEUM TRUST FUND
INTEREST 7,438 1,214 3,004 3,004 3,000
OTHER REVENUES 10,844 1,779 - - 8,200
Total 818 -- MUSEUM TRUST FUND 18,282 2,993 3,004 3,004 11,200 Fund 821 -- SCHOLZE PARK TRUST FUND
INTEREST 39,459 28,774 11,678 11,678 15,000
Total 821 -- SCHOLZE PARK TRUST FUND 39,459 28,774 11,678 11,678 15,000 Fund 822 -- SCHOLZE PLAYGROUND TRUST FUND
INTEREST 39,458 8,941 11,666 11,666 15,000
Total 822 -- SCHOLZE PLAYGROUND TRUST FUND 39,458 8,941 11,666 11,666 15,000 Fund 900 -- SPECIAL DEPOSITS FUND
INTEREST 1,798 1,351 - - -
Total 900 -- SPECIAL DEPOSITS FUND 1,798 1,351 - - -
Fund 918 -- CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1
Attachment 2 53
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 67, Packet Page 265 SUMMARY OF REVENUES BY TYPE (excludes Transfers-In)
Title FY19/20 Actual FY20/21 Actual
FY21/22
Adopted FY21/22 Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST TAX 5,075,436 2,385,918 2,824,971 2,824,971 4,861,830 INTEREST 136,390 28,443 30,774 30,774 35,000
Total 918 -- CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1 5,211,826 2,414,361 2,855,745 2,855,745 4,896,830 Fund 961 -- GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND
OTHER TAXES 33,008 - - - -
Total 961 -- GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND 33,008 - - - -
Total 163,468,185 146,240,101 164,879,852 177,791,289 187,676,483 Attachment 2 54
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 68, Packet Page 266

EXPENDITURES
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 55
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 69, Packet Page 267

SUMMARY OF OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY FUND
(excludes CIP Budgets and Transfers-Out)
Fund Title
FY19/20
Actual
FY20/21
Actual
FY21/22
Adopted
FY21/22
Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
101 101 GENERAL FUND $ 78,914,774 $ 67,639,994 $ 78,752,988 $ 84,620,597 88,966,135 210 210 WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND 9,877 62,010 75,000 75,000 75,000 215 215 SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST 17,317 20,819 17,135 24,515 7,416 216 216 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND 2,699,382 2,681,194 417,723 7,827,594 390,356 241 241 FEDERAL/STATE PROJECTS FUND 100,444 (37) - 239,560 - 251 251 GAS TAX FUND - 15,000 20,000 73,143 20,000
255 CONSTRUCTION TRUCK IMPACT FEE FUND - - - 113,025
261 261 ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT 104,523 95,739 103,666 29,872 106,206 262 262 CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT 30,616 25,068 26,963 326,002 27,560 268 268 LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND 190,000 558,991 326,110 895,477 366,765 269 269 EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM - 353,223 - 1,370,109 431,419 270 270 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND 923,910 1,460,109 1,243,668 125,338 1,515,084 274 274 HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRALLA 90,382 37,344 125,340 - 278 278 HOME GRANT 2005 FUND - - - 2,786,841 35,000
279 279 SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND 1,899,710 2,200,991 2,701,992 1,433,693 2,902,064 280 280 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 1,076,630 1,317,031 1,288,292 25,750 1,362,102 290 290 WATER SYSTEM IMPROV FUND - - 25,750 104,880
291 291 PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS 105,371 81,845 66,275 10,000 133,500 292 292 ASSET SEIZURE FUND - - - - -
299 299 SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND 8,877 - 12,500 12,500 12,500 310 310 DEBT SERVICE FUND 543,875 543,918 549,067 551,318 541,635 314 314 RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND 6,999 2,853 - 2,298 404 404 STATE LOAN - 89,223 - 3,728,388
408 408 CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION 524,771 86,753 - 3,912,208 410 410 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 19,279,137 13,368,819 1,497,975 95,295,722 600 600 MARINA FUND 1,990,253 2,591,886 2,292,291 2,364,675 2,699,463 610 610 CEMETERY FUND 790,189 635,360 481,963 536,516 505,083 625 625 PARKING FUND 8,853,718 6,396,597 8,848,883 9,479,890 7,937,406 641 641 MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY 102,823 102,823 8,040 10,291 13,830 642 642 OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD 7,186 7,586 27,000 27,000 7,800 650 650 PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS 17,118,017 18,213,408 14,322,703 27,665,815 14,735,762 655 655 NAVY SERVICES FUND 198,845 330,534 354,050 354,050 300,000 705 705 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,130,336 (167,943) 1,011,865 1,495,006 972,219 708 708 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 2,444,627 2,364,646 2,410,835 2,620,491 2,738,193 710 710 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 4,474,841 3,636,211 3,736,114 5,293,355 7,089,449 715 715 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST 2,899,140 3,812,847 3,717,465 3,717,277 437,111 716 716 LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE 1,872,460 3,361,157 2,387,169 3,419,743 4,030,553 718 718 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND 8,979,853 8,572,724 10,258,879 10,258,879 10,338,990 807 807 TIDELANDS TRUST FUND 2,979,962 3,079,128 3,440,455 3,624,358 3,500,441 810 810 LIBRARY TRUST FUND 114,774 206,685 178,061 309,744 253,748 818 818 MUSEUM TRUST FUND 2,357 - 6,450 6,450 5,150
918 918 CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1 5,154,230 2,571,705 3,558,058 3,558,058 3,612,058 961 961 GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND 21,490 - 50,122 50,122 - GFA GENERAL FIXED ASSET GROUP 5,264,836 5,438,884
TOTAL $ 170,926,528 $ 151,795,126 $ 144,340,847 $ 278,375,551 $156,069,998 Attachment 2 56
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 70, Packet Page 268

SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT (excludes CIP Budgets and Transfers-Out)
Fund Department & Divisions
FY19/20
Actual
FY20/21
Actual
FY21/22
Adopted
FY21/22
Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
Fund 101 -- GENERAL FUND
COM DEV -- Community Development
4400 PLANNING & BLDG INSPECT ECON DEVELOP $ 2,163,170 1,914,778 1,921,044 1,966,658 $ 3,280,112 4410 BUILDING SAFETY AND INSPECTION 1,319,506 1,269,454 1,265,082 641,467 1,526,714 4440 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 92,228 81,596 116,500 116,500 93,500 4300 PROPERTY MGMT 253,713 234,748 263,171 263,133 325,336 Total COM DEV -- Community Development 3,828,617 3,500,576 3,565,798 2,987,758 5,225,662 FIRE -- Fire
2510 FIRE - ADMINISTRATION 1,814,985 1,769,713 1,757,880 1,787,700 1,924,884 2520 FIRE - PREVENTION 443,064 297,218 280,835 413,686 704,768 2530 FIRE - OPERATIONS 20,499,712 20,564,269 20,899,041 22,272,853 23,222,200 2540 FIRE - TRAINING 307,227 187,563 199,510 209,510 218,341 2550 FIRE - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 121,194 98,889 70,373 57,671 70,212 Total FIRE -- Fire 23,186,182 22,917,652 23,207,639 24,741,420 26,140,405 GenGov -- General Government
0100 MAYOR/COUNCIL 121,719 121,990 118,650 118,650 108,315 0210 CITY MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION 914,945 834,794 1,071,391 1,185,092 1,073,302 0211 COMMUNICATIONS & OUTREACH 304,635 239,573 259,410 259,261 227,101 0321 CITY CLERK 597,247 507,360 473,968 462,333 672,309 0500 CITY ATTORNEY 1,097,710 1,143,369 1,212,072 1,211,773 1,231,566 0600 HUMAN RESOURCES 842,422 859,301 921,017 920,451 1,037,568 1110 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 674,781 634,185 727,860 989,595 1,072,912 1120 REVENUE DIVISION 772,048 805,775 908,415 908,415 1,024,100 1130 ACCOUNTING DIVISION 1,415,536 1,249,347 1,473,098 1,473,098 1,642,598 9110 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 229,496 207,127 351,633 371,633 99,943 9111 REOPENING & HIRING FUND - - 135,000 245,000 -
9113 COMMUNITY PROMOTION - CITYWIDE 153,697 - 172,623 172,623 40,000 9114 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS 194,910 170,169 43,421 43,421 - 9115 COMMUNITY PROMOTION - JULY 4TH - - - - 46,083
Total GenGov -- General Government 7,319,146 6,772,991 7,868,558 8,361,344 8,229,714 Libr-Mus -- Library & Museum
5510 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION 1,103,188 784,293 776,754 806,444 973,028 5520 SUPPORT SERVICES 449,204 218,926 485,927 622,728 491,203 5530 REFERENCE SERVICES 345,240 167,123 244,861 244,637 333,621 5540 YOUTH SERVICES 292,932 12,175 156,875 288,961 417,039 5550 READERS' SERVICES 553,197 123,289 485,227 231,443 400,015 5610 MUSEUM 381,950 110,469 200,837 200,706 208,941
5640 PRESIDIO HISTORIC PARK/MUSEUM 16,686 18,961 25,926 25,926 33,017 Total Libr-Mus -- Library & Museum 3,125,711 1,416,275 2,350,481 2,394,919 2,823,847 MCC -- Monterey Conf Center
6210 CONFERENCE CENTER-ADMIN 746,725 631,301 675,234 675,009 834,322 6220 CONFERENCE CENTER SALES 516,781 213,582 447,450 447,300 365,202 6231 CONFERENCE CENTER - EVENT OPERATIONS 1,273,648 327,995 873,070 1,107,768 1,404,915 6232 CONFERENCE CENTER - BUILDING MAINTENANCE 297,607 166,778 459,053 535,660 341,805 6234 CONFERENCE CTR - LANDSCAPE/GENERAL MAINT 245,668 218,705 222,270 222,270 16,500 6240 CONFERENCE CENTER - VISITOR PROMOTION 989,405 992,405 992,405 992,405 1,500,000 Total MCC -- Monterey Conf Center 4,069,834 2,550,766 3,669,482 3,980,412 4,462,744 P&R -- Parks & Recr
5210 PARKS 3,351,048 3,384,550 4,240,126 4,223,149 3,426,238 5230 URBAN FORESTRY 857,048 856,337 968,313 968,107 1,179,341 3240 PAY LOCATION/CEMETERY -
5110 PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 996,298 560,901 796,785 800,224 816,466 5121 RECREATION - MONTEREY YOUTH CENTER 429,630 245,533 363,497 363,310 412,192 Attachment 2 57
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 71, Packet Page 269

SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT (excludes CIP Budgets and Transfers-Out)
Fund Department & Divisions
FY19/20
Actual
FY20/21
Actual
FY21/22
Adopted
FY21/22
Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
Fund 101 -- GENERAL FUND
5122 RECREATION - SCHOLZE PARK CENTER 285,548 78,408 258,364 258,233 221,852 5123 RECREATION - ARCHER PARK CENTER 3,862 4,235 1,910 1,910 3,330 5124 RECREATION - HILLTOP PARK CENTER 405,276 141,747 413,720 415,710 374,386 5125 RECREATION - CASANOVA OAK KNOLL PARK CTR 415,848 253,196 73,081 67,804 30,328 5130 RECREATION - SPECIAL PROGRAMS & EVENTS 359,826 99,567 524,828 524,697 650,615 5160 RECREATION - SPORTS 252,254 78,312 216,559 269,007 547,192 5180 MONTEREY SPORTS CENTER 5,158,661 1,522,224 3,281,148 3,541,198 3,581,872 5189 SPORTS CENTER - BLDG MAINT. 454,271 230,471 604,067 658,065 597,778 9115 COMMUNITY PROMOTION - JULY 4TH 20,897
Total P&R -- Parks & Recr 12,990,467 7,455,481 11,742,397 12,091,415 11,841,590 POLICE -- Police
2110 POLICE - OFFICE OF THE CHIEF 3,391,998 3,189,575 4,475,316 4,480,789 4,018,509 2120 PATROL DIVISION 11,362,241 10,215,261 11,027,641 11,215,305 13,183,199 2130 ADMINISTRATION DIVISION 2,100,779 1,976,167 2,040,196 2,038,245 2,655,373 2140 INVESTIGATION/SPECIAL OPERATIONS DIVISIO 1,827,997 1,634,331 2,017,005 2,059,619 2,221,519 Total POLICE -- Police 18,683,015 17,015,333 19,560,159 19,793,957 22,078,600 PW -- Public Works
3110 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 723,278 833,210 873,631 880,417 979,122 3121 ENGINEERING DESIGN SECTION 618,280 1,265,856 1,417,918 1,420,731 2,103,557 3140 CAPITAL PROJECTS DIVISION 2,935 8,452 - - -
3151 STREET MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 1,669,431 1,626,669 1,990,139 1,980,811 2,014,748 3152 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,402,869 1,222,071 1,310,942 1,645,356 1,733,364 3172 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 1,278,324 1,035,700 1,169,919 1,169,115 1,253,682 Total PW -- Public Works 5,695,117 5,991,959 6,762,549 7,096,430 8,084,473 Total 101 -- GENERAL FUND 78,914,775 67,639,994 78,752,988 81,473,582 88,966,135 Total $ 78,914,775 $ 67,639,994 $ 78,752,988 $ 81,473,582 $ 88,966,135 Attachment 2 58
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 72, Packet Page 270

SUMMARY OF OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY FUND AND DIVISION
(excludes CIP Budgets and Transfers-Out)
Fund Title
FY19/20
Actual
FY20/21
Actual
FY21/22
Adopted
FY21/22
Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
Fund 101 -- GENERAL FUND
0100 MAYOR/COUNCIL $ 121,719 $ 121,990 $ 118,650 $ 118,650 $ 108,315 0210 CITY MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION 914,945 834,794 1,071,391 1,185,092 1,073,302 0211 COMMUNICATIONS & OUTREACH 304,635 239,573 259,410 259,261 227,101 0321 CITY CLERK 597,247 507,360 473,968 462,333 672,309 0500 CITY ATTORNEY 1,097,710 1,143,369 1,212,072 1,211,773 1,231,566 0600 HUMAN RESOURCES 842,422 859,301 921,017 920,451 1,037,568 1110 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 674,781 634,185 727,860 989,595 1,072,912 1120 REVENUE DIVISION 772,048 805,775 908,415 908,415 1,024,100 1130 ACCOUNTING DIVISION 1,415,536 1,249,347 1,473,098 1,473,098 1,642,598 2110 POLICE - OFFICE OF THE CHIEF 3,391,998 3,189,575 4,475,316 4,480,789 4,018,509 2120 PATROL DIVISION 11,362,241 10,215,261 11,027,641 11,215,305 13,183,199 2130 ADMINISTRATION DIVISION 2,100,779 1,976,167 2,040,196 2,038,245 2,655,373 2140 INVESTIGATION/SPECIAL OPERATIONS DIVISIO 1,827,997 1,634,331 2,017,005 2,059,619 2,221,519 2510 FIRE - ADMINISTRATION 1,814,985 1,769,713 1,757,880 1,787,700 1,924,884 2520 FIRE - PREVENTION 443,064 297,218 280,835 413,686 704,768 2530 FIRE - OPERATIONS 20,499,712 20,564,269 20,899,041 22,272,853 23,222,200 2540 FIRE - TRAINING 307,227 187,563 199,510 209,510 218,341 2550 FIRE - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 121,194 98,889 70,373 57,671 70,212 3110 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 723,278 833,210 873,631 880,417 979,122 3121 ENGINEERING DESIGN SECTION 618,280 1,265,856 1,417,918 1,420,731 2,103,557 3140 CAPITAL PROJECTS DIVISION 2,935 8,452 - - -
3151 STREET MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 1,669,431 1,626,669 1,990,139 1,980,811 2,014,748 3152 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,402,869 1,222,071 1,310,942 1,645,356 1,733,364 3172 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 1,278,324 1,035,700 1,169,919 1,169,115 1,253,682 4300 PROPERTY MGMT 253,713 234,748 263,171 263,133 325,336 4400 PLANNING & BLDG INSPECT ECON DEVELOP 2,163,170 1,914,778 1,921,044 1,966,658 3,280,112 4410 BUILDING SAFETY AND INSPECTION 1,319,506 1,269,454 1,265,082 641,467 1,526,714 4440 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 92,228 81,596 116,500 116,500 93,500 5110 PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 996,298 560,901 796,785 800,224 816,466 5121 RECREATION - MONTEREY YOUTH CENTER 429,630 245,533 363,497 363,310 412,192 5122 RECREATION - SCHOLZE PARK CENTER 285,548 78,408 258,364 258,233 221,852 5123 RECREATION - ARCHER PARK CENTER 3,862 4,235 1,910 1,910 3,330 5124 RECREATION - HILLTOP PARK CENTER 405,276 141,747 413,720 415,710 374,386 5125 RECREATION - CASANOVA OAK KNOLL PARK CTR 415,848 253,196 73,081 67,804 30,328 5130 RECREATION - SPECIAL PROGRAMS & EVENTS 359,826 99,567 524,828 524,697 650,615 5160 RECREATION - SPORTS 252,254 78,312 216,559 269,007 547,192 5180 MONTEREY SPORTS CENTER 5,158,661 1,522,224 3,281,148 3,541,198 3,581,872 5189 SPORTS CENTER - BLDG MAINT. 454,271 230,471 604,067 658,065 597,778 5210 PARKS 3,351,048 3,384,550 4,240,126 4,223,149 3,426,238 5230 URBAN FORESTRY 857,048 856,337 968,313 968,107 1,179,341 5510 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION 1,103,188 784,293 776,754 806,444 973,028 5520 SUPPORT SERVICES 449,204 218,926 485,927 622,728 491,203 5530 REFERENCE SERVICES 345,240 167,123 244,861 244,637 333,621 5540 YOUTH SERVICES 292,932 12,175 156,875 288,961 417,039 5550 READERS' SERVICES 553,197 123,289 485,227 231,443 400,015 5610 MUSEUM 381,950 110,469 200,837 200,706 208,941
5640 PRESIDIO HISTORIC PARK/MUSEUM 16,686 18,961 25,926 25,926 33,017 6210 CONFERENCE CENTER-ADMIN 746,725 631,301 675,234 675,009 834,322 6220 CONFERENCE CENTER SALES 516,781 213,582 447,450 447,300 365,202 6230 CONFERENCE CENTER - OPERATIONS
6231 CONFERENCE CENTER - EVENT OPERATIONS 1,273,648 327,995 873,070 1,107,768 1,404,915 6232 CONFERENCE CENTER - BUILDING MAINTENANCE 297,607 166,778 459,053 535,660 341,805 6234 CONFERENCE CTR - LANDSCAPE/GENERAL MAINT 245,668 218,705 222,270 222,270 16,500 6240 CONFERENCE CENTER - VISITOR PROMOTION 989,405 992,405 992,405 992,405 1,500,000 9110 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 229,496 207,127 351,633 371,633 99,943 Attachment 2 59
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 73, Packet Page 271

SUMMARY OF OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY FUND AND DIVISION
(excludes CIP Budgets and Transfers-Out)
Fund Title
FY19/20
Actual
FY20/21
Actual
FY21/22
Adopted
FY21/22
Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
9111 REOPENING & HIRING FUND - - 135,000 245,000 -
9113 COMMUNITY PROMOTION - CITYWIDE 153,697 - 172,623 172,623 40,000 9114 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS 194,910 170,169 43,421 43,421 - 9115 COMMUNITY PROMOTION - JULY 4TH 20,897 - - - 46,083 Total 101 -- GENERAL FUND 78,914,775 67,639,994 78,752,988 81,473,582 88,966,135 Fund 210 -- WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND
3420 HARBOR TIDELANDS MAINTENANCE 9,877 62,010 75,000 75,000 75,000 Total 210 -- WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND 9,877 62,010 75,000 75,000 75,000 Fund 215 -- SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST
5210 PARKS 17,317 20,819 17,135 17,135 7,416
Total 215 -- SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST 17,317 20,819 17,135 17,135 7,416 Fund 216 -- NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND
3110 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 449,066 197,633 241,911 241,836 214,544 3140 CAPITAL PROJECTS DIVISION - 0 175,812 175,812 175,812 3199 PROJECT ACCOUNTING ROLL-UP 2,250,315 2,483,561 0 6,887,947 - Total 216 -- NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND 2,699,382 2,681,194 417,723 7,305,595 390,356 Fund 241 -- FEDERAL/STATE PROJECTS FUND
3121 ENGINEERING DESIGN SECTION 100,444 (37) - 239,560 - Total 241 -- FEDERAL/STATE PROJECTS FUND 100,444 (37) - 239,560 - Fund 251 -- GAS TAX FUND
3121 ENGINEERING DESIGN SECTION - 15,000 0 0 20,000
3151 STREET MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES - 0 20,000 73,143 - Total 251 -- GAS TAX FUND - 15,000 20,000 73,143 20,000 Fund 261 -- ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT
5210 PARKS 104,523 95,739 103,666 103,644 106,206
Total 261 -- ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT 104,523 95,739 103,666 103,644 106,206 Fund 262 -- CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT
5210 PARKS 30,616 25,068 26,963 26,956 27,560
Total 262 -- CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT 30,616 25,068 26,963 26,956 27,560 Fund 268 -- LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND
4305 HOUSING ADMINISTRATION 187,773 183,066 322,410 322,302 366,765 4310 HOUSING PROJECTS 2,225 375,920 - - -
4315 HOUSING TRUST 3 4 3,700 3,700 -
Total 268 -- LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND 190,000 558,991 326,110 326,002 366,765 Fund 269 -- EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
4310 HOUSING PROJECTS - 353,223 - 895,477 431,419
Total 269 -- EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM - 353,223 - 895,477 431,419 Fund 270 -- COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND
4300 PROPERTY MGMT 5,859 5,787 4,000 4,000 59,500
4305 HOUSING ADMINISTRATION 287,048 264,270 300,196 300,155 426,460 4310 HOUSING PROJECTS 631,004 1,190,052 939,472 932,126 1,029,124 Total 270 -- COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND 923,910 1,460,109 1,243,668 1,236,280 1,515,084 Fund 274 -- HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRALLA
4300 PROPERTY MGMT 88,565 37,244 124,968 101,186 -
4310 HOUSING PROJECTS 1,817 100 372 370 -
Total 274 -- HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRALLA 90,382 37,344 125,340 101,555 - Fund 278 -- HOME GRANT 2005 FUND
4300 PROPERTY MGMT 35,000
Total 278 -- HOME GRANT 2005 FUND - - - - 35,000
Fund 279 -- SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND
3121 ENGINEERING DESIGN SECTION 126,198 184,083 354,361 354,268 428,173 3153 SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE 1,678,025 2,016,908 2,347,631 2,347,225 2,473,891 Total 279 -- SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND 1,804,222 2,200,991 2,701,992 2,701,493 2,902,064 Fund 280 -- STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
3121 ENGINEERING DESIGN SECTION 634,131 717,241 720,828 720,566 715,246 Attachment 2 60
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 74, Packet Page 272

SUMMARY OF OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY FUND AND DIVISION
(excludes CIP Budgets and Transfers-Out)
Fund Title
FY19/20
Actual
FY20/21
Actual
FY21/22
Adopted
FY21/22
Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
3155 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 442,499 599,790 567,464 556,084 646,856 Total 280 -- STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 1,076,630 1,317,031 1,288,292 1,276,650 1,362,102 Fund 290 -- WATER SYSTEM IMPROV FUND
2520 FIRE - PREVENTION - - 25,750 25,750 -
Total 290 -- WATER SYSTEM IMPROV FUND - - 25,750 25,750 - Fund 291 -- PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS
2530 FIRE - OPERATIONS 103,745 78,425 35,000 71,767 106,000 2540 FIRE - TRAINING 1,626 3,420 31,275 31,200 27,500
Total 291 -- PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS 105,371 81,845 66,275 102,967 133,500 Fund 299 -- SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND
5122 RECREATION - SCHOLZE PARK CENTER 8,877 - 12,500 12,500 12,500 Total 299 -- SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND 8,877 - 12,500 12,500 12,500 Fund 310 -- DEBT SERVICE FUND
7012 DEBT SERVICE - LEASE REV.BONDS 543,875 543,918 549,067 549,067 541,635 Total 310 -- DEBT SERVICE FUND 543,875 543,918 549,067 549,067 541,635 Fund 314 -- RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND
7012 DEBT SERVICE - LEASE REV.BONDS 6,999 2,853.00 - - - Total 314 -- RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND 6,999 2,853 - - - Fund 404 -- STATE LOAN
3199 PROJECT ACCOUNTING ROLL-UP - 89,223 - 3,728,388 -
Total 404 -- STATE LOAN - 89,223 - 3,728,388 -
Fund 408 -- CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION
3199 PROJECT ACCOUNTING ROLL-UP 524,771 86,753 - 3,586,618 - Total 408 -- CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION 524,771 86,753 - 3,586,618 - Fund 410 -- CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
3199 PROJECT ACCOUNTING ROLL-UP 22,602,617 15,514,035 1,497,975 0 - ZZ99 CIP CONTRA EXP./FIXED ASSETS (3,323,480) -2,145,216 - - - Total 410 -- CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 19,279,137 13,368,819 1,497,975 - - Fund 600 -- MARINA FUND
3310 MARINA ADMINISTRATION 620,400 642,202 828,792 838,576 1,009,963 3320 MARINA MAINTENANCE 1,381,124 1,444,197 780,905 843,713 957,002 3330 MARINA SECURITY 349,803 388,692 357,248 357,041 407,153 7014 DEBT SERVICE - LOANS 75,513 116,793 325,346 325,346 325,345 Total 600 -- MARINA FUND 2,426,840 2,591,886 2,292,291 2,364,675 2,699,463 Fund 610 -- CEMETERY FUND
5240 PAY LOCATION/CEMETERY 437,602 635,360 481,963 481,883 505,083 7012 DEBT SERVICE - LEASE REV.BONDS -
Total 610 -- CEMETERY FUND 437,602 635,360 481,963 481,883 505,083 Fund 625 -- PARKING FUND
3510 PARKING ADMINISTRATION 3,796,651 1,970,232 2,412,394 2,342,343 2,467,335 3520 PARKING ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (475,330) 183,219 1,624,075 1,692,039 1,750,692 3530 PARKING MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 2,656,545 2,949,300 1,910,768 1,910,095 2,519,308 3540 ATTENDANT/CASHIER/SECURITY 1,122,782 942,002 1,233,402 1,226,720 997,301 5210 PARKS 34,397 116,856 102,586 102,586 202,770
7012 DEBT SERVICE - LEASE REV.BONDS 300,000 - 300,000 300,000 - 7014 DEBT SERVICE - LOANS 279,371 234,988 1,265,659 1,265,659 - 9110 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 480,000 - - - -
Total 625 -- PARKING FUND 8,194,416 6,396,597 8,848,883 8,839,442 7,937,406 Fund 641 -- MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY
3110 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 102,823 102,822.98 8,040 8,040 13,830 Total 641 -- MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY 102,823 102,823 8,040 8,040 13,830 Fund 642 -- OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD
1110 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 7,186 7,586.20 27,000 27,000 7,800 Total 642 -- OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD 7,186 7,586 27,000 27,000 7,800 Fund 650 -- PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS
Attachment 2 61
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 75, Packet Page 273

SUMMARY OF OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY FUND AND DIVISION
(excludes CIP Budgets and Transfers-Out)
Fund Title
FY19/20
Actual
FY20/21
Actual
FY21/22
Adopted
FY21/22
Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
3110 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 1,956,382 2,057,325 1,123,205 1,122,981 1,227,148 3151 STREET MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 364,589 395,587 404,532 404,283 418,388 3152 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,653,489 6,115,258 7,660,215 7,347,886 7,283,898 3155 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 42,652 56,992 81,895 81,895 90,174 3158 SEASIDE PASSTHROUGH 1,094,510 589,375 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 3159 PROJECT ENGINEERING & ADMIN 300,425 277,754 294,336 294,149 314,491 3161 DEFENSE MANPOWER DATA CENTER 302,447 299,728 515,292 491,637 522,920 3163 USASA CAMP ROBERTS 771,778 1,002,051 1,149,841 1,149,692 1,495,925 3164 NAVAL RESEARCH LAB CAMP ROBERTS 286,929 228,447 361,927 361,853 532,530 3165 REFUSE CONTRACTS 551,554 752,876 900,000 900,000 960,000 3199 PROJECT ACCOUNTING ROLL-UP 5,567,247 6,101,488 478,600 11,996,658 495,067 3210 PARKS 226,015 336,527 352,859 352,745 395,221
Total 650 -- PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS 17,118,017 18,213,408 14,322,703 25,503,779 14,735,762 Fund 655 -- NAVY SERVICES FUND
3140 CAPITAL PROJECTS DIVISION - - 54,050 54,050 -
3165 REFUSE CONTRACTS 198,845 330,534 300,000 300,000 300,000 Total 655 -- NAVY SERVICES FUND 198,845 330,534 354,050 354,050 300,000 Fund 705 -- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
1130 ACCOUNTING DIVISION 1,188,656 -184,034.39 902,500.00 902,500.00 857,500 7014 DEBT SERVICE - LOANS 17,386 16,091.69 109,365.00 109,365.00 114,719 Total 705 -- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,206,042 (167,943) 1,011,865 1,011,865 972,219 Fund 708 -- VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
3154 VEHICLE MANAGEMENT 2,137,457 2,364,247.43 2,409,318.99 2,408,792.01 2,737,693 3156 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS STATION 1,344 398.24 1,516.00 1,516.00 500 Total 708 -- VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 2,138,801 2,364,646 2,410,835 2,410,308 2,738,193 Fund 710 -- INFORMATION SERVICES FUND
0340 INFORMATION SERVICES 3,982,730 3,636,211.12 3,736,114.03 4,929,955.42 7,089,449 G011 SOFTWARE 36,670 -
Total 710 -- INFORMATION SERVICES FUND 4,019,399 3,636,211 3,736,114 4,929,955 7,089,449 Fund 715 -- WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST
0612 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE 2,513,349 3,812,846.90 3,717,464.66 3,717,276.76 437,111 Total 715 -- WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST 2,513,349 3,812,847 3,717,465 3,717,277 437,111 Fund 716 -- LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE
1143 RISK MANAGEMENT 1,874,499 3,361,157.09 2,387,169.37 3,380,994.33 4,030,553 Total 716 -- LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE 1,874,499 3,361,157 2,387,169 3,380,994 4,030,553 Fund 718 -- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND
0614 SALARY CONTINUATION -
0615 HEALTH INSURANCE 7,694,599 6,760,232.37 8,513,377.00 8,513,377.00 8,783,665 0616 VISION INSURANCE 79,735 70,683.78 112,173.00 112,173.00 80,665 0617 DENTAL INSURANCE 630,100 681,161.67 891,035.00 891,035.00 725,665 0618 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PLAN 41,604 28,976.76 87,948.00 87,948.00 31,665 0619 LIFE INSURANCE 116,355 116,565.97 124,698.00 124,698.00 135,665 0620 LONG TERM DISABILITY 320,554 259,555.74 339,948.00 339,948.00 341,665 0622 UNEMPLOYMENT 10,247 564,400.92 102,400.00 102,400.00 150,000 0623 NON-PAYROLL BENEFITS 86,659 91,147.09 87,300.00 87,300.00 90,000 Total 718 -- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND 8,979,853 8,572,724 10,258,879 10,258,879 10,338,990 Fund 807 -- TIDELANDS TRUST FUND
1120 REVENUE DIVISION - 45,373.01 37,118.76 37,118.76 48,201 2120 PATROL DIVISION 588,766 664,865.98 649,631.88 649,631.88 255,250 2140 INVESTIGATION/SPECIAL OPERATIONS DIVISIO 6,884 3,419.64 5,358.98 5,284.23 3,180 2530 FIRE - OPERATIONS 99,869 125,318.47 84,282.00 84,282.00 192,977 3410 BUILDING SAFETY AND INSPECTION 570,148 564,443.73 969,682.43 969,600.21 1,020,259 3420 HARBOR TIDELANDS MAINTENANCE 429,831 490,002.23 339,437.70 418,404.54 484,754 3430 HARBOR TIDELANDS SECURITY 173,041 175,399.88 147,472.96 147,399.71 155,917 3440 RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY - 118,448.00 118,448.00 114,979 Attachment 2 62
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 76, Packet Page 274

SUMMARY OF OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY FUND AND DIVISION
(excludes CIP Budgets and Transfers-Out)
Fund Title
FY19/20
Actual
FY20/21
Actual
FY21/22
Adopted
FY21/22
Amended
FY22/23
Proposed
4300 PROPERTY MGMT 456,794 515,988.22 684,910.32 684,738.40 787,911 5210 PARKS 57,371 70,174.35 53,436.00 53,436.00 86,337
5230 URBAN FORESTRY 289.69 -
9020 TIDELANDS TRUST 385,259 333,852.42 350,676.00 350,676.00 350,676 9110 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 212,000 90,000.00 - - -
Total 807 -- TIDELANDS TRUST FUND 2,979,962 3,079,128 3,440,455 3,519,020 3,500,441 Fund 810 -- LIBRARY TRUST FUND
5510 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION 88,502 134,949.47 124,258.94 207,001.78 174,690 5520 SUPPORT SERVICES - 22,484.23 - 22,200.00 6,658
5530 REFERENCE SERVICES 4,705 12,207.61 21,252.00 14,306.00 17,050 5540 YOUTH SERVICES 10,114 37,176.41 30,800.00 36,970.48 53,600 5550 READERS' SERVICES 11,453 -132.35 1,750.00 1,750.00 1,750 Total 810 -- LIBRARY TRUST FUND 114,774 206,685 178,061 282,228 253,748 Fund 818 -- MUSEUM TRUST FUND
5610 MUSEUM 2,357 - 6,450.00 6,450.00 5,150
Total 818 -- MUSEUM TRUST FUND 2,357 - 6,450 6,450 5,150 Fund 918 -- CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1
7013 DEBT SERVICE-SPECIAL ASSMTS 5,154,230 2,571,705.36 3,558,058.00 3,558,058.00 3,612,058 Total 918 -- CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1 5,154,230 2,571,705 3,558,058 3,558,058 3,612,058 Fund 961 -- GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND
5122 RECREATION - SCHOLZE PARK CENTER 21,490 - 50,122.00 50,122.00 - Total 961 -- GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND 21,490 - 50,122 50,122 - Fund GFA -- GENERAL FIXED ASSET GROUP
9110 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 5,264,836 5,438,884.40 - - -
Total GFA -- GENERAL FIXED ASSET GROUP 5,264,836 5,438,884 - - - Total $169,186,427 $151,795,126 $144,340,847 $175,456,865 $156,069,998 Attachment 2 63
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 77, Packet Page 275 Attachment 2 64
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 78, Packet Page 276

FIVE YEAR

FORECAST
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 65
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 79, Packet Page 277 Five Year Forecast: FY 2021-22 through FY 2026-27
General Fund ($ million)
FY 2021-22
Amended
FY 2022-23
Proposed**
FY 2023-24
Forecast
FY 2024-25
Forecast
FY 2025-26
Forecast
FY 2026-27
Forecast
Revenues $ 80.80 $ 88.80 $ 90.50 $ 92.40 $ 94.00 $ 96.60 ARPA Funds $ 6.50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Revenue $ 87.30 $ 88.80 $ 90.50 $ 92.40 $ 94.00 $ 96.60 Expenses $ 82.00 $ 91.10 $ 92.90 $ 94.80 $ 96.70 $ 98.60 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenses $ 5.30 $ (2.30) $ (2.40) $ (2.40) $ (2.70) $ (2.00) Transfers, Debt Service & CIP
Transfer In $ 0.70 $ 1.10 $ 1.10 $ 0.80 $ - $ -
Transfer Out: Other $ (0.14) $ (0.20) $ (0.20) $ (0.20) $ (0.10) $ (0.20) Transfer Out: Debt $ (0.54) $ (0.50) $ (0.50) $ (0.50) $ (0.50) $ (0.50) Transfer Out: Capital $ (1.52) $ (0.80) $ (0.80) $ (0.50) $ (0.50) $ (0.50) Total Transfer, Debt, CIP $ (1.50) $ (0.40) $ (0.40) $ (0.40) $ (1.10) $ (1.20) Operating Surplus/Deficit $ 3.80 $ (2.70) $ (2.80) $ (2.80) $ (3.80) $ (3.20) Attachment 2 66
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 80, Packet Page 278

RESERVES &

DESIGNATIONS
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 67
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 81, Packet Page 279 Reserves: Contributions for FY 2021-22 through FY 2026-27 Reserves & Designations*
($ million)
Economic Uncertainty $ 2.40 $ 0.21 $ 0.30 $ 0.31 $ 0.31 $ 0.32 Capital Projects $ 0.75 $ 0.75 $ 0.75 $ 0.75 $ 0.75 $ 0.75 Encumbrances $ (0.70) $ (0.75) $ (0.50) $ (0.50) $ - $ - Other Designations $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Pension Fund $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 1.00
Conference Center Facilities $ 0.75 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 Sports Center Facilities $ 0.90 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 Technology $ 1.50 $ 0.25 $ 0.75 $ 0.75 $ 0.25 $ 0.25
Other Facilities $ - $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 Total $ 6.60 $ 2.26 $ 3.10 $ 3.11 $ 3.11 $ 3.12
Econ Uncert REserve as % of GF Budget** 18.0% 16.6% 16.6% 16.6% 16.6% 16.6% *Reserves are annual planned/proposed contributions
**Annual contributions to Economic Uncertainty aims to maintain the 16.6% of GF Budget policy FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 Attachment 2 68
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 82, Packet Page 280

INTERFUND

TRANSFERS
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 69
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 83, Packet Page 281

INTERFUND TRANSFERS
101 261 310 410 625 718
General Fund St Maint. Debt Svc Projects Parking Benefits Total 101 General Fund
Maintenance District Contribution 47,693
Debt Service Payment 543,918
PERS Replacement Benefit/IRS 415(b) Plan 87,296
Capital Projects 750,000
Subtotal - General Fund 1,428,907
249 State Grant Fund
Grant for Domestic Violence Officer position ($100K at yea 100,000 100,000 251 Gas Tax Fund
Signal Maintenance 6,000 6,000
600 Marina Fund
Parking Support - per space cost includes meter
replacement, collection & counting, enforcement 235,873 Purchase boat
Subtotal - Marina Fund 235,873
625 Parking Fund
cleaning/traffic engineering 278,098 278,098
807 Tidelands Trust Fund
Parks/Streets Maint Services 224,617
Purchase boat
Interfund Advance - radios
Subtotal - Tidelands Fund 224,617
821 Scholze Park maint split 50/50 25,000 25,000
822 Scholze Park maint split 50/50 25,000 25,000
Total $ 658,715 $ 47,693 $ 543,918 $ 750,000 $ 235,873 $ 87,296 $ 2,323,495 Transfers Out
Note: Transfers In/Out are accounted for in Balance Sheet accounts 2538 (Operating Transfers In) & 2539 (Operating Transfers Out). They are not included in Revenue/Expenditure budgets.

City of Monterey
Interfund Transfers and Repayments of Interfund Advances FY 2022-23 Budget
Transfers In 2022/23
Attachment 2 70
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 84, Packet Page 282

INTERFUND REPAYMENTS
101 705 807
General Fund Replcmnt Tidelands Total
101 General Fund
Repay fire engine advance 4,975
Repay fire truck debt svc converted to advance 17,825
Repay Radio Loan & interest 176,738
Subtotal - General Fund 199,538
268 Housing Fund
Repay Monterey Hotel advance 20,000 20,000
625 Parking
Repay 1977-89 cash advances & interest 1,265,658 1,265,658 716 Liability/Property Insurance
Repay Settlement Loan & interest 235,000 235,000
Total 1,385,658 22,800 411,738 1,820,196
Note: Repayments To/From are included in Expenditure/Revenue budgets.

Repayments To 2022/23
Repayments From
Attachment 2 71
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 85, Packet Page 283 Attachment 2 72
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 86, Packet Page 284

POSITION

CONTROL
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 73
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 87, Packet Page 285 CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT Administration
Community
Resources/
Education City Clerk Total Allocation
Fund 101 0210 0211 0321

1.00 1.00

0.83 0.83

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total City Manager Dept 2.83 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.83 Conference Center Administration Sales
Event
Operations Maintenance Total Allocation
Fund 101 6210 6220 6231 6232

1.00 1.00
Custodian 1.75 1.75

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Event Coordinator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.25 3.25
Operations Coordinator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Conference Center 2.00 1.00 9.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.00

INFORMATION RESOURCES

DEPARTMENT
Information
Resources Total Allocation
Fund 710 0340

1.00 1.00

0.17 0.17

1.00 1.00

0.00 0.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Senior Information Tech Specialist 1.00 1.00

0.00 0.00
IT Application Engineer II 3.00 3.00

1.00 1.00
Total Information Services Dept 9.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.17

CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT
City Attorney
Administration Total Allocation
Fund 101 0500

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total City Attorney Dept 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 HUMAN RESOURCES Administration (1)
Workers' Comp/
Employee
Benefits(2)
Risk
Management (3) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/715(2)/716(3) 0600 0612 1143

1.00 0.00 1.00
Assistant HR Director 0.50 0.50 1.00

0.00 0.00 0.00
Human Resources Coordinator 0.00 0.00

0.75 0.25 1.00

2.00 2.00
Senior Human Resouces Analyst 1.00 1.00
Total Human Resources Dept 4.25 1.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00

AMENDED POSITION CONTROL LIST
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Administrative Analyst
Administrative Assistant
Assistant City Manager
City Manager
Facility Attendant
Operations Supervisor
Senior Craftsworker
Asst. Director of Information Resourc
Assistant City Manager
GEO Info System (GIS) Coordinator
City Clerk
Executive Assistant
Conference Center General Mgr
Event & Sales Assistant
Sales Coordinator
Event Supervisor
Deputy City Attorney
Legal Secretary
Human Resources Analyst
Deputy Human Resources Manager
Human Resources Director
Human Resources Specialist
Network Engineer
Information Technology Specialist
Information Technology Analyst
Systems & Network Administrator
Assistant City Attorney
City Attorney
Network Engineer II
Attachment 2 74
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 88, Packet Page 286

AMENDED POSITION CONTROL LIST
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
FINANCE DEPARTMENT Finance (1) Revenue Accounting Revenue(2) Risk
Management (3)
Workers' Comp/
Employee
Benefits(2) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/807(2)/716(3) 1110 1120 1130 1120 1143 0612

1.00 3.00 4.00
Accounting Assistant 0.00 0.00

1.70 2.00 0.300 4.00

1.00 1.00
Business License Inspector 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 2.00

0.75 0.25 1.00
Finance Manager 1.00 1.00 2.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Risk Manager 1.00 1.00
Total Finance Dept 1.75 5.70 8.00 0.30 1.25 0.00 17.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT Administration Field Operations Support Investigations/
Community
Services
Investigations/
Community
Services(2) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/807(2) 2110 2120 2130 2140 2120
Assistant Police Chief 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Police Officer 33.00 5.00 1.00 39.00

0.00 7.00 2.00 9.00

2.00 1.00 3.00
Community Service Officer 1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00 3.00
Police Services Technician 8.00 8.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 3.00
Total Police Dept 4.00 43.00 14.00 8.00 1.00 0.00 70.00 FIRE DEPARTMENT Administration
Fire Prevention
& Emerg.

Preparedness Fire Operations Fire Training Total Allocation Fund 101 2510 2520 2530 2540

1.00 1.00
Admininstrative Assistant 0.00 0.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Fire Prevention Plans Exam 0.00 0.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00 4.00
Fire Captain 21.00 1.00 22.00

24.00 24.00

30.00 30.00

1.00 1.00
Total Fire Dept 5.00 1.00 78.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 86.00

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Administration(1
)
Neighborhood
Improvement
Fund Admin(2)
Presidio Maint.

Admin(3) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/216(2)/650(3) 3110 3110 3110

1.00 1.00
Accounting Assistant 1.00 1.00

0.20 0.20

0.50 0.25 0.75
Engineering Projects Manager 1.00 1.00
Revenue Manager
Senior Accountant
Police Chief
Police Sergeant
Police Lieutenant
Police Services Assistant
Accountant/Auditor
Accounting Specialist
Assistant Finance Director
Executive Assistant I
Finance Analyst
Finance Director
Fire Prevention Technician
Deputy Fire Marshal
Division Chief
Fire Engineer
Firefighter
Senior Adminstrative Analyst
Police Records/Detention Supervisor
Senior Administrative Analyst
Senior Police Services Technician
Assistant Fire Chief
Executive Assistant I
Fire Chief
Administration
Accounting Specialist
Deputy PW Director/City Engineer
PW Administrative Services Mgr
Attachment 2 75
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 89, Packet Page 287

AMENDED POSITION CONTROL LIST
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

1.00 1.00

0.00 0.00

1.00 1.00
Total Administration 3.50 1.00 1.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.95 Engineering Engineering(1)
Sewer Line
MaintenanceEngineering(2)Storm Drain
Engineering(3)
Presidio Proj
Engineering &
Admin(4) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/279(2)/280(3)/650(4) 3121 3121 3121 3159

2.00 0.75 2.75

1.00 1.00

2.85 0.15 2.00 5.00

1.00 1.00

0.13 0.20 0.20 0.53

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Engineering Project Manager 1.00 0.00 1.00

2.00 1.00 3.00

3.40 0.30 0.30 1.00 5.00

1.00 1.00

0.42 0.58 1.00

0.14 0.86 1.00

0.00 0.00
Total Engineering 17.38 1.21 1.94 4.75 0.00 0.00 25.28
Vehicle Management -Mechanical Mechanical Total Allocation Fund 708 3154

4.00 4.00
Admin Assistant 1.00 1.00

0.00 0.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Vehicle Mgmt.-Mechanical 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 Building Maintenance
Building
Maintenance(1)
Presidio Maint.

Bldgs(2)
Presidio Camp
Roberts(2)
Presidio Naval
Research(2) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/650(2) 3152 3152 3163 3164

1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 14.00

1.00 3.00 0.00 4.00

0.15 0.85 1.00

0.25 0.75 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.25 3.25

1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00

1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00 3.00

0.00 0.00

1.00 4.00 5.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Building Maintenance 5.40 32.85 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 44.25 Streets/Sewer/Stormdrain
Maintenance Maintenance(1)
Presidio Maint.

Streets(2)
Sewer
Maintenance(3)
Storm Drain
Maintenance(4) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/650(2)/279(3)/280(4) 3151 3151 3153 3155

0.30 0.20 0.30 0.20 1.00

0.37 0.30 0.08 0.75

0.02 0.01 0.03
Principal Engineer
Public Works Director
Administrative Assistant
Engineering Programs Analyst
Associate Civil Engineer
City Traffic Engineer
Executive Assistant 1
Senior Administrative Analyst
Senior Public Works Inspector
Environmental Reg. Analyst
Environmental Reg. Manager
Associate Mechanical Engineer
Automotive Mechanic
Field Assistant
Construction Project Manager
Deputy PW Director/City Engineer
Engineering Assistant II
Engineering Technician
Public Works Inspector
Senior Engineer
Maintenance Technician
Administrative Analyst
Administrative Assistant
Building Maintenance Supervisor
Building Maintenance Worker
Facilities Maintenance Coordinator
Parts Clerk
Fleet Manager
Lead Mechanic
Building Maintenance Craftsworker
Electrician
General Srvc Superintendent
Senior Parts Clerk
Streets & Utilities Operations Manag
Administrative Assistant
PW Administrative Services Mgr
Historic Facilities Sr. Craftsworker
HVAC Senior Technician
Parts Clerk
Quality Control Inspector
Senior Craftsworker
Senior Locksmith
Attachment 2 76
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 90, Packet Page 288

AMENDED POSITION CONTROL LIST
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00

1.00 1.00

0.74 1.13 0.13 2.00

2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 6.00

1.00 1.00 2.00
Total Streets 6.41 2.33 5.75 2.29 0.00 0.00 16.78
Custodial Services Custodial Total Allocation
Fund 101 3172

7.00 7.00

0.00 0.00
Lead Custodian 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00
Total Custodial Services 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 Marina/Harbor
Administration(1
) Maintenance(1) Security(1)
Administration(2
) Maintenance(2) Security(2) Total Allocation
Fund 600(1)/807(2) 3310 3320 3330 3410 3420/3440 3430

0.50 0.50 1.00
Harbor Coordinator 1.00 1.00 2.00

0.00 1.50 1.50

0.80 0.20 1.00

0.05 0.05 0.10

0.04 0.03 0.07

1.00 1.00 2.00

0.50 0.50 1.00

2.78 0.98 3.75
Total Marina/Harbor 2.39 1.50 2.78 1.78 3.00 0.98 12.42 Parking Administration Enforcement Maintenance
Parking
Services Total Allocation
Fund 625 3510 3520 3530 3540

2.75 2.75

1.00 1.00

0.75 0.75

1.00 1.00

0.17 0.17

0.15 0.15

8.00 8.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

4.00 4.00

0.50 0.50 1.00

4.50 4.50

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Parking 6.32 10.00 9.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 31.32
Community Development Department Planning
Building Safety
& Inspection Total Allocation
Fund 101 4400 4410

2.00 1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

0.40 0.40
Housing & Community Dev Mgr 0.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Planning Manager 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Senior Street Maintenance Worker
Sign Craftsworker
Harbormaster
Facility Attendant (RPT)
Marina Harbor Assistant
Deputy PW Director/City Engineer
PW Administrative Services Mgr
Harbor Maintenance Craftsworker
Street Maintenance Leadworker
Street Maintenance Worker
Street & Utilities Supervisor
Custodian
Facility Attendant
Senior Custodian
Deputy PW Director/City Engineer
PW Administrative Services Mgr
Parking Enforcement Officer
Parking Enforcement Supervisor
Senior Parking Enforcement Off.

Parking Controls Technician
Harbor Maintenance Leadworker
Harbor Security Worker
Accounting Assistant
Accounting Specialist
Administrative Assistant
Parking Superintendent
Senior Parking Controls Technician
Administrative Assistant
Associate Planner
Community Development Director
Principal Planner
Senior Associate Planner
Parking Maintenance Supervisor
Parking Maintenance Leadworker
Parking Maintenance Worker
Parking Services Coordinator
Parking Services Representative
Parking Services Specialist
Code Compliance Coordinator
Sustainability Manager
Sustainability Assistant
Plans Examiner
Building Technician
Attachment 2 77
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 91, Packet Page 289

AMENDED POSITION CONTROL LIST
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Community Development 10.40 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.40 Housing & Property Management
Property
Mgmt(1)
Property
Mgmt(2)
Housing
Admin(3)
Housing
Admin(4)
Housing
Projects(4)
Housing
Projects(5) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/807(2)/268(3)/270(4)/274(5) 4300 4300 4305 4305 4310 4310

0.50 0.50 1.00

0.90 0.85 0.50 0.25 0.25 2.75

0.10 0.30 0.20 0.60

0.50 0.50 1.00

0.15 0.85 1.00
Total Housing & Property Mgmt 1.15 2.00 1.70 1.25 0.25 0.00 6.35 Parks & Recreation Department Administration Total Allocation Recreation
Fund 101 5110

1.00 1.00

0.34 0.34

1.00 1.00
Total Recreation 2.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.34
Recreation Centers Youth Center Senior Center
Hilltop Park
Center
Cona Park
Center
Special
Programs &
Events Sports Total Allocation
Fund 101 5121 5122 5124 5125 5130 5160

1.00 1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00
Sports Coordinator 1.00 1.00
Lead Preschool Instructor 0.75 0.75

1.00 1.75 2.75
Total Centers 1.00 1.00 1.75 0.00 1.00 2.75 7.50
Monterey Sports Center Operations Maintenance Total Allocation Fund 101 5180 5189

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Aquatic Specialist 0.00 0.00

1.00 1.00
Fitness Supervisor 1.00 1.00
Guest Services Specialist 0.00 0.00

0.33 0.33

0.75 0.75

1.00 1.00
Sports Coordinator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Sports Center 7.08 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.08
Parks Maintenance(1)
Presidio
Maintenance(2)
Street
Maintenance
District(3)
Urban
Forestry(1) Cemetery (4) Parking (5) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/650(2)261-262(3)610(4)625(5) 5210 3210 5210 5230 5240 5210

0.75 0.25 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Park Maintenance Leadworker 2.00 2.00

1.00 1.00
Park Maintenance Worker 9.10 0.00 0.40 0.50 1.00 11.00

0.80 0.03 0.15 0.02 1.00

0.33 0.33

3.00 3.00

0.50 0.50 1.00
Greenbelt Coordinator 1.00 1.00
Senior Building Inspector
Inspector
Administrative Analyst
Administrative Assistant
Community Development Director
HCD Coordinator - Projects/Prgm.

Chief Of Inspct Srvc/Bldg Off.

Recreation Specialist
Administrative Assistant
Aquatics Coordinator
Facility Coordinator
Parks & Rec Director
Recreation Specialist
Property Manager
Administrative Assistant
Parks & Rec Director
Rec & Comm Services Manager
Recreation Coordinator
Recreation Supervisor
Park Maintenance Supervisor
Park Operations Manager
Parks & Rec Director
Senior Park Maintenance Worker
Assistant Urban Forester
Sports Center Manager
Building Maintenance Craftsworker
Senior Craftsworker
Maintenance Technician
Park Attendant
Park Maintenance Craftsworker
Attachment 2 78
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 92, Packet Page 290

AMENDED POSITION CONTROL LIST
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Parks 18.98 0.53 0.40 2.90 2.52 1.00 26.33
Museum Administration Total Allocation
Fund 101 5610
Museum Operations Specialist 0.00

0.25 0.25
Total Museum 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25
LIBRARY Administration (1)
Administration
Trust (2)
Support
Services (1)
Reference
Services (1)
Youth Services
(1)
Reader's
Services (1) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/810(2) 5510 550-5510 5520 5530 5540 5550

0.75 0.75

1.00 1.00

0.75 0.75

1.00 0.75 2.00 3.75

1.00 1.00

3.00 3.00

1.00 1.00
Total Library 1.75 0.00 2.75 3.00 1.75 2.00 11.25
GRAND TOTAL 135.35 113.87 142.52 35.27 10.77 6.73 444.50 Urban Forester
Library Assistant II
Technology Services Mgr
Librarian
Library Manager
Cemetery Coordinator
Cemetery Maintenance Worker
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Assistant
Library Director
Library Assistant I
Attachment 2 79
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 93, Packet Page 291

POSITION CONTROL LIST
FUNDED FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Position Count Total Allocation
Accountant/Auditor 4.00
Accounting Assistant 4.75
Accounting Specialist 6.00
Administrative Analyst 4.00
Administrative Assistant 18.25
Aquatics Coordinator 1.00
Assistant City Attorney 1.00
Assistant City Manager 1.00
Assistant Finance Director 1.00
Assistant Fire Chief 1.00
Assistant Police Chief 1.00
Assistant Urban Forester 1.00
Associate Civil Engineer 5.00
Associate Planner 1.00
Asst. Director of Information Resources 1.00
Asst. Director of Human Resources 1.00
Automotive Mechanic 4.00
Building Maintenance Craftsworker 15.00
Building Maintenance Supervisor 4.00
Building Maintenance Worker 3.00
Building Technician 1.00
Business License Inspector 1.00
Capital Projects Coordinator 1.00
Cemetery Coordinator 1.00
Cemetery Maintenance Worker 1.00
Chief Of Inspct Srvc/Bldg Off. 1.00
City Attorney 1.00
City Clerk 1.00
City Manager 1.00
City Traffic Engineer 1.00
Code Compliance Coordinator 1.00
Community Development Director 1.00
Community Service Officer 2.00
Conference Center General Mgr 1.00
Construction Project Manager 1.00
Custodian 8.75
Deputy City Attorney 1.00
Deputy Fire Marshal 1.00
Deputy PW Director/City Engineer 1.00
Division Chief 3.00
Electrician 4.00
Engineer Projects Manager 1.00
Engineering Assistant II 1.00
Engineering Technician 1.00
Environmental Reg. Analyst 1.00
Attachment 2 80
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 94, Packet Page 292

POSITION CONTROL LIST
FUNDED FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Position Count Total Allocation
Environmental Reg. Manager 1.00
Event & Sales Assistant 1.00
Event Coordinator 1.00
Event Supervisor 1.00
Executive Assistant 4.00
Facilities Maintenance Coordinator 1.00
Facility Attendant 4.75
Facility Coordinator 1.00
Finance Analyst 2.00
Finance Manager 2.00
Finance Director 1.00
Fire Captain 22.00
Fire Chief 1.00
Fire Division Chief 1.00
Fire Engineer 24.00
Fire Prevention Technician 1.00
Firefighter 30.00
Fitness Supervisor 1.00
Fleet Manager 1.00
General Srvc Superintendent 1.00
GEO Info System (GIS) Coordinator 1.00
Greenbelt Coordinator 1.00
Harbor Coordinator 2.00
Harbor Maintenance Craftsworker 2.00
Harbor Maintenance Leadworker 1.00
Harbor Security Worker 3.75
Harbormaster 1.00
HCD Coordinator - Projects/Prgm. 1.00
Historic Facilities Sr. Craftsworker 1.00
Human Resources Analyst 1.00
Human Resources Director 1.00
Human Resources Specialist 2.00
HVAC Senior Technician 3.00
Information Application Engineer II 3.00
Information Technology Specialist 1.00
Inspector 1.00
Lead Custodian 1.00
Lead Mechanic 1.00
Lead Preschool Instructor 0.75
Legal Secretary 1.00
Librarian 3.00
Library Assistant I 0.75
Library Assistant II 3.75
Library Director 1.00
Library Manager 1.00
Attachment 2 81
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 95, Packet Page 293

POSITION CONTROL LIST
FUNDED FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Position Count Total Allocation
Maintenance Technician 2.00
Marina Harbor Assistant 1.00
Network Engineer II 1.00
Operations Coordinator 1.00
Operations Supervisor 1.00
Park Attendant 1.00
Park Maintenance Craftsworker 1.00
Park Maintenance Leadworker 2.00
Park Maintenance Supervisor 1.00
Park Maintenance Worker 11.00
Park Operations Manager 1.00
Parking Controls Technician 2.00
Parking Enforcement Officer 8.00
Parking Enforcement Supervisor 1.00
Parking Maintenance Leadworker 1.00
Parking Maintenance Supervisor 1.00
Parking Maintenance Worker 4.00
Parking Services Coordinator 1.00
Parking Services Representative 4.50
Parking Services Specialist 1.00
Parking Superintendent 1.00
Parks & Rec Director 1.00
Parts Clerk 1.00
Planning Manager 1.00
Plans Examiner 1.00
Police Chief 1.00
Police Lieutenant 3.00
Police Officer 39.00
Police Records/Detention Supervisor 1.00
Police Sergeant 9.00
Police Services Assistant 3.00
Police Services Technician 8.00
Principal Engineer 1.00
Principal Planner 1.00
Property Manager 1.00
Public Works Director 1.00
Public Works Inspector 2.00
PW Administrative Services Mgr 1.00
Recreation Manager 1.00
Recreation Coordinator 2.00
Recreation Specialist 3.50
Recreation Supervisor 1.00
Risk Manager 1.00
Sales Coordinator 1.00
Senior Administrative Analyst 3.00
Attachment 2 82
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 96, Packet Page 294

POSITION CONTROL LIST
FUNDED FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Position Count Total Allocation
Senior Associate Planner 2.00
Senior Building Inspector 1.00
Senior Craftsworker 7.00
Senior Custodian 2.00
Senior Engineer 5.00
Senior Human Resouces Analyst 1.00
Senior Information Technology Specialist 1.00
Senior Locksmith 1.00
Senior Park Maintenance Worker 3.00
Senior Parking Controls Technician 1.00
Senior Parking Enforcement Off. 1.00
Senior Parts Clerk 1.00
Senior Police Services Technician 3.00
Senior Public Works Inspector 1.00
Senior Street Maintenance Worker 4.00
Sign Craftsworker 1.00
Sports Center Manager 1.00
Street & Utilities Supervisor 2.00
Street Maintenance Leadworker 2.00
Street Maintenance Worker 6.00
Streets & Utilities Operations Manager 1.00
Sustainability Assistant 1.00
Sustainability Manager 1.00
Systems & Network Administrator 1.00
Technology Services Specialist 1.00
Urban Forester 1.00
GRAND TOTAL 444.50
Attachment 2 83
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 97, Packet Page 295

FINANCIAL

POLICIES
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 84
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 98, Packet Page 296 The City will set fees and user charges for each enterprise fund at a level that fully supports the total direct and indirect program costs. Indirect costs will ultimately include the cost of annual depreciation of fixed assets.

The City Council will establish fees for non-enterprise funds based upon an awareness of the total direct and indirect costs of offering a service. It is recognized that certain services may be subsidized by general taxes based upon a level of subsidy determined by the Council.

The City will aggressively pursue collection of all revenues when due.

The City Council will adopt and maintain a balanced annual operating budget and an integrated five-year capital improvement budget.

Current annual revenues will be equal to or greater than current expenditures. The City will maintain a longrange fiscal perspective by annually preparing and maintaining a five-year General Fund operating revenue, expenditure and available reserve schedule and a five-year capital improvement plan.

Any normal existing revenue inflation will be used to pay for normal existing expenditure inflation. The identification of funding sources will be required for any new or expanded programs.

The City will provide for adequate maintenance and the orderly replacement of fixed assets and equipment.

As resource allocation plans are developed, consideration for citywide public safety shall be given high priority.

The City will comply with all the requirements of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

The City will annually retain the services of an independent Certified Public Accounting firm to audit the City's financial statements and conduct any tests of the City's records deemed necessary to render an opinion on the City's compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

All estimated construction, maintenance and operating costs and potential funding sources for each proposed capital improvement and neighborhood improvement will be identified before it is submitted to the City Council for approval.

The City will finance only those capital improvements that are consistent with the adopted capital improvement plan and City priorities. All capital improvement operating and maintenance costs will be included in operating budget forecasts.

Only capital improvements that cannot be financed from current revenues will be financed with debt borrowing except for enterprise funds. The City will determine and use the least costly financing method for all new capital improvement projects.

The term for repayment of long-term financing for capital improvements will not exceed the expected useful life of the project.

Financial Policies
This section summarizes the policies the City follows in managing its finances.

Revenue Policies
Operating Budget Policies
Capital Improvement Policies
Debt Policies
Attachment 2 85
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 99, Packet Page 297 Interfund loans may be used from one City fund to another City fund for a specific purpose with a requirement for repayment. Interfund loans should be considered temporary or short-term borrowing of cash and should not hinder the accomplishment of any function or project for which the lending fund was established. Interfund loans must be approved by the City Council; the Finance Director will establish appropriate repayment terms and ensure that loan repayment is budgeted as part of the annual budget process.

At year-end, restricted fund balances for specific purposes are determined (excluding non-spendable amounts). Remaining fund balance, considered spendable, is classified into committed, assigned or unassigned categories depending upon the intended use of the balances. Fund balance amounts for other governmental funds are classified as restricted or committed depending upon the purpose and restrictions imposed on each specific fund. The City applies expenditures to the most restrictive available balances first, then less restricted funds as required.

Any year-end surplus (unassigned) which results in the General Fund fund balance exceeding the level required by the Reserve Policy shall be available for allocation for the following, subject to Council approval:

The City maintains reserves to mitigate risk, which include a stabilization arrangement in the form of the “Reserve for Economic Uncertainty” and a “Reserve for Pension Liability”. The City Council retains the authority to establish these reserves as Committed Fund Balance. The City goal is to maintain a combination of reserves equivalent to 16.6% of the General Fund annual operating budget. The Reserve for Economic Uncertainty is established for the purpose of providing funds for an unforeseen, urgent event that affects the operations or safety of the City (e.g. natural disaster). The recognition of an urgent event must be established by the City Council, and a budget revision must be approved. In the event that the balance drops below the established minimum level, the City Council will develop a plan to replenish the reserve(s).

Any related reimbursement funds received (ex: insurance, FEMA) will be used to replenish the reserve.

The City will maintain appropriate reserves in the Self-Insurance Funds based on statutory requirements and actuarially projected needs.

Acquisition of real property shall be tied to a specific objective, with the source of adequate funds identified and considerations given for the long-term fiscal and policy impacts.

Disposition of real property shall be considered for those properties without specific deed restrictions and which are unused, under-utilized, economically not viable, or acquired.

Fund Balance Classification
Reserve Policies
Property Management Policies
Transfer to the Capital Renewal Reserve for appropriation within the Capital Improvement Program Budget and/or Deferred Maintenance for non-recurring needs Re-appropriation within the subsequent year’s operating budget to provide for one-time, nonrecurring needs Attachment 2 86
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 100, Packet Page 298

GLOSSARY
FY 2022 - 2023 OPERATING BUDGET
Attachment 2 87
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 101, Packet Page 299 Glossary
This section summarizes the policies the City follows in managing its finances.

Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Accrual Basis of Accounting
Adopted Budget
Amortization
Appropriation
Assessed Valuation
Assets
Audit
Authorized Positions
Basis of Accounting
Balance Sheet
A short-term liability account reflecting amounts owed to private persons or organizations for goods and services received by a government.

An asset account reflecting amounts due from private persons or organizations for goods and services furnished by a government.

A method of accounting that recognizes the financial effect of transactions, events, and interfund activities when they occur, regardless of the timing of related cash flows.

The City Council approved annual budget establishing the legal authority for the expenditure of funds as set forth in the adopting Council budget resolution.

The process of decreasing or allocating a lump sum amount over a period of time, particularly for loans and other forms of finance, including related interest and other finance charges.

Legal authorization, as required by the City Charter, granted to the City Manager by the City Council to expend monies, and/or to incur legal obligations for specific departmental purposes. An appropriation is usually limited in amount, as well as to the time when it may be expended.

A dollar value placed upon real estate or other property by Monterey County as a basis for levying property taxes.

Property owned by a government, which has monetary value.

Prepared by an independent certified public accountant (CPA), the primary objective of an audit is to determine if the City’s financial statements fairly present the City’s financial position and results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

Regular positions authorized in the budget to be employed during the fiscal year.

The timing of recognition, that is, when the effects of transactions or events are recognized for financial reporting or budgeting purposes. The three basis of accounting for governmental agencies are: (1) cash basis (when cash is received or paid), (2) accrual basis (when the underlying transaction or event takes place), and (3) modified accrual basis (revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become available and measurable and expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the fund liability occurred).

A statement purporting to present the financial position of an entity by disclosing the value of its assets, liabilities, and equities as of a specific date.

Attachment 2 88
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 102, Packet Page 300 Balanced Budget
Beginning Fund Balance
Bond
Bond Rating
BRAC
Budget
Budget Calendar
Budget Adoption
Budgetary Control
CalPERS
Capital Asset
Capital Budget
Capital Outlay
Cash Basis of Accounting
When the total of revenues and other financing sources is equal to or greater than the total of expenditures and other financing uses, the budget is balanced.

Fund balance available in a fund from the end of the prior year for use in the following year.

A city may raise capital by issuing a written promise to pay a specified sum of money, called the face value or principal amount, at a specified date or dates in the future, together with periodic interest at a special rate.

An evaluation of a bond issuer’s credit quality and perceived ability to pay the principal and interest on time and in full. Two agencies regularly review city bonds and generate bond ratings: Moody’s Investors Service and Standard and Poor’s Ratings Group.

An acronym which stands for base realignment and closure. It is the process the Department of Defense (DoD) has used previously to reorganize its installation infrastructure to support its forces in more cost effective ways (e.g. budget reductions).

A plan of financial and program operation listing an estimate of proposed appropriations or expenses and the proposed means of financing them, for a particular time period. The budget is proposed or preliminary until it has been adopted by the City Council.

The schedule of key dates or milestones which a government follows in preparation and adoption of a budget.

Formal action by the City Council, which sets the spending path for the year.

The control or management of a government or enterprise in accordance with an approved budget for the purpose of keeping expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and revenues.

State of California Public Employees’ Retirement System.

A tangible, fixed asset that is long-term in nature, of significant value, and obtained or controlled as a result of past transactions, events or circumstances. Fixed assets include land, buildings, equipment, improvements to buildings, and infrastructure (i.e., streets, highways, bridges, and other immovable assets). A capital asset is defined as an asset with a useful life extending beyond a single accounting period.

A financial plan of proposed capital improvement projects and the means of financing them for a given period of time.

A budget category which budgets all equipment having a unit cost of more than $5,000 and an estimated useful life of more than three years. Capital Outlay items are budgeted in the operating budget.

A basis of accounting under which transactions are recognized only when cash is received or disbursed.

Attachment 2 89
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 103, Packet Page 301 Certificates of Participation (COPs)
City Charter
City Manager’s Message
Community Priorities
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
Conference Center Facilities District (CCFD)
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Contingency
Department
Debt
Debt Financing
Debt Service
Deficit
This financing technique provides long-term financing through a lease, installment sale agreement or loan agreement. Certificates of Participation (COPs) allow the public to purchase (in $5,000 increments) participation in a stream of lease payments, installment payments or loan payments relating to the acquisition or construction of specific equipment, land or facilities.

Legal authority approved in 1925 by the voters of Monterey under the State of California Constitution establishing the current "Council - Manager" form of government organization.

A general discussion of the proposed budget as presented in writing by the City Manager to the City Council. The message contains an explanation of the principal budget items and summarizes the proposed budget relative to the current year adopted budget.

Strategic work objectives that require collaborative action by several City departments and partnerships with other elements of the community.

The official annual report of the City’s financial condition at the conclusion of the fiscal year. The report is prepared to conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for governmental units and presentation of the financial data in conformity with the Adopted Budget.

Formed by resolution on November 19, 2013 to provide a vehicle for financing the renovation of the Monterey Conference Center under California’s Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982. The CCFD provides a framework to levy a special tax on property developed for visitor accommodation facilities (i.e. hotel properties). The special tax ranges from 0.8% to 4.15% of all rent, depending on the classification of the hotel property.

A statistical description of price levels provided by the U.S Department of Labor. The change in this index from year to year is used to measure the cost of living and economic inflation.

A budgetary reserve set aside for emergency or unanticipated expenditures, revenue shortfalls, and/or unknown expenditures.

An operational and budgetary unit designated by the City Council to define and organize City operations, or a group of related operations within a functional area.

An obligation resulting from the borrowing of money or from the purchase of goods and services. Debts of governments include bonds, time warrants, and notes.

Issuance of bonds and other debt instruments to finance municipal improvements and services.

Debt service refers to the interest and principal payments on bond issues and Certificate of Participation, and includes the issuance costs related to bond funding.

The excess of an entity’s liabilities over its assets, or the excess of expenditures or expenses over revenue during a single accounting period.

Attachment 2 90
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 104, Packet Page 302 Depreciation
Division
Encumbrances
Enterprise Fund
Expenditure
Expense
Expense Category
Fiduciary Fund
Fiscal Year
Fringe Benefits
FTE
Fund
Fund Balance
(1) Expiration in the service life of capital outlay assets attributable to wear and tear, deterioration, action of the physical elements, inadequacy or obsolescence. (2) The portion of the cost of a capital asset that is charged as an expense during a particular period.

An organizational unit consisting of program(s) or activity(ies) within a department which furthers the objectives of the City Council by providing services or a product.

Financial commitments related to unperformed contracts for goods or services for which part of an appropriation is reserved. They cease to be encumbrances when the obligations are paid or otherwise terminated.

A type of fund established to account for the total costs of those governmental facilities and services which are operated in a manner similar to private enterprises. These funds are entirely or predominately self-supporting.

The payment made for cost of services rendered, materials, equipment, and capital improvements.

Charges incurred (whether paid immediately or unpaid) for operations, maintenance, interest, or other charges.

Expense object categories: Salaries and Benefits, Supplies and Expenses, Internal Services, Capital Outlay Fee
The payment for direct receipt of a public service by the party who benefits from the service.

A fund type to report assets held in a trustee or agency capacity for others and which therefore cannot be used to support the government’s own programs. The fiduciary fund category includes pension, trust funds, investment trust funds, private-purpose trust funds, and agency funds.

A twelve-month accounting period of time to which the budget applies; for Monterey, it is July 1 through June 30.

Benefits including employee retirement, Medicare, health, dental, vision, life insurance, uniforms, and deferred compensation plans.

Full Time Equivalent Employee (FTE) 2,080 hours per year = 1.0 Full-Time Equivalent position.

An independent fiscal and accounting entity used to record all financial transactions related to the specific purpose for which the fund was created. There are three major types of fund: Governmental (general, special revenue, debt service, capital projects, and permanent), Proprietary (enterprise and internal service), and Fiduciary (trust and agency).

The amount of financial resources immediately available for use. Generally, this represents the excess of unrestricted current assets over current liabilities.

Attachment 2 91
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 105, Packet Page 303 Gann Appropriation Limit
General Fund
General Obligation Bond
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
Goal
Governmental Accounting
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB)
Governmental Fund
Grant
Indirect Cost Allocation Plan
Article XIIIB of the State constitution was amended by Proposition 4 (Gann initiative) in 1979. Article XIIIB limits growth in the spending of tax proceeds to tax proceeds appropriated in the "base year" of 1978-79 times the product of the allowable annual percentage change in a cost-of-living factor and the allowable annual percentage change in a population change factor. The cost-of-living factor is the larger of the annual percentage change in the State per capita personal income or the annual percentage change in the local non- residential assessed valuation due to new construction. The population change factor is the larger of the annual percentage change of the jurisdiction's population or the annual percentage population change of the county in which the jurisdiction is located.

The primary fund of the City used to account for all revenues and expenditures of the City not legally restricted as to use. Examples of departments financed by the General Fund include City Council, Police and Fire Departments.

A type of bond that is backed by the full faith, credit, and taxing power of the City.

Uniform minimum standards and guidelines for financial accounting and reporting. They govern the form and content of the financial statements of an entity. GAAP encompass the conventions, rules, and procedures necessary to define accepted accounting practice at a particular time. They include not only broad guidelines of general application, but also detailed practices and procedures. GAAP provide a standard by which to measure financial presentations. The primary authoritative body on the application of GAAP to state and local governments is the GASB.

Goals are general statements of desired results and serve as points of reference to guide actions, decisions, and resource allocation.

The composite activity of analyzing, recording, summarizing, reporting, and interpreting the financial transactions of governments.

The authoritative accounting and financial reporting standard-setting body for government entities A fund type to account for tax-supported activities. There are five different types of governmental funds:
the general fund, special revenue funds, debt service funds, capital projects funds, and permanent funds.

Contributions or gifts of cash or other assets from another governmental entity to be used or expended for a specific purpose, activity or facility. An example is the Community Development Block Grant given by the Federal government.

The City uses an indirect cost allocation plan to ensure that enterprises and certain special revenue supported operations pay for themselves and are not subsidized by City taxpayers. General fund supported central services costs such as payroll, accounting, data processing, personnel, city management and facilities maintenance are allocated to those funds benefiting from these services based on statistical data reflecting use of these support services.

Attachment 2 92
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 106, Packet Page 304 Infrastructure
Interfund Transactions
Internal Service Fund
Liability
Line Item Detail
Long-Term Debt
Measure P
Mission
Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting
Municipal Code
Objective
Operating Budget
Facilities on which the continuance and growth of a community depend on such as roads, water lines, sewers, public buildings, parks and airports.

These budgetary transactions consist of quasi-external transactions which would be treated as revenues and expenditures if they involved organizations external to the governmental unit, reimbursements of expenditures initially made in one fund which are attributable to another fund, and operating transfers where monies are appropriated from one fund to another fund to reimburse expenses which are of benefit to the first fund.

Funds used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department or agency to other departments or agencies of a government, on a cost-reimbursement basis.

Debt or other legal obligations arising out of transactions in the past which must be liquidated, renewed, or refunded at some future date. Note: This term does not include encumbrances.

A budget that lists detailed expenditure categories (permanent salaries, utilities, travel, training, etc.) separately, along with the amount budgeted for each specified category.

Debt with a maturity of more than one year after the date of issue.

Measure P increases the sales tax rate by one percent in the City of Monterey for four years “to address significant deferred maintenance by fixing streets, sidewalks, and potholes; improve related access and safety for senior citizens, disabled residents, and others; and repair its 100-year-old storm drain system to protect our beaches/Monterey Bay.” The ballot measure was approved by 74% of voters in November 2014.

The tax is effective from April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2019.

A description of the basic purpose and responsibility of the division or department.

Basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become available and measurable; expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the fund liability is incurred (if measurable), except for unmatured interest on general long-term debt and certain similar accrued obligations, which should be recognized when due.

A compilation of City Council approved ordinances currently in effect. The Code defines City policy in various categories, for example, Civil Service rules, traffic regulations, sanitation and health standards, building regulations, and planning and zoning regulations.

Statement describing a significant result or service level change to be accomplished during the next fiscal year. It describes a specific, verifiable, and measurable actions, steps, or process undertaken in the service of a goal.

A financial, programmatic and organizational plan for furthering the goals of the City Council through the departments of the City, which does not include one-time capital improvements projects.

Attachment 2 93
Council Special Meeting, 6/29/2022, Item No. 7., Item Page 107, Packet Page 305 Ordinance
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Pay-As-You-Go Basis
Performance Measure
Program
Proprietary Fund
Purchase Order
Re-appropriation
Reimbursements
Reserve
Resolution
Return on Investment
Revenue
A formal legislative enactment by the City Council. It has the full force and effect of law within the City boundaries unless it is in conflict with any higher form of law such as a State statute or constitutional provision. An ordinance has higher legal standing than a resolution.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010 that is aimed at increasing the rate of health insurance coverage for Americans and reducing the overall costs of health care.

A term used to describe a financial policy by which capital outlays are financed from current revenues rather than through borrowing.

Quantifiable indicators that measure program workload or progress in achieving program objectives.

An activity or division within a department which furthers the objectives of the City Council by providing services or a product.

Funds that focus on the determination of operating income, changes in net assets (cost recovery), financial position, and cash flows. There are two types of proprietary funds: Enterprise and Internal Service Funds.

A document issued to authorize a vendor to deliver specified merchandise or render a specified service for a stated estimated price. Outstanding purchase orders are called encumbrances.

Monterey City CouncilJune 29, 2022

Monterey City Council
June 29, 2022