Agenda packet — Monterey City Council, June 6, 2023 (part 2 of 3)

The lake at the time was significantly polluted. The plan proposed the addition of an aeration system, silting basin, and the removal of tule growth along the edges to help decrease nitrogen levels in the water.

In 1981 the “Land Use Plan for the Laguna Grande/Roberts Lake Local Coastal Program”, was completed by the cities of Monterey and Seaside to come under compliance with the Regional Coastal Commission. It was not until 1982 that the Park was opened to the public. The master plan for the Park was never fully implemented. The northern end of the park was built out with playgrounds, fields and park facilities. The south end of the park, meant to become an extension of the lake, was not completed due to lack of funds. As droughts became more frequent in California and with the slow buildup of sediments, the marshy, low wetlands to the south began to dry and more mature vegetation developed, forming a low dense woodland of willows and brambles that exist today.

REFERENCES
Schmalz, David. “Despite a persistent problem of encampments at Laguna Grande Park, the years go by, and nothing seems to change.” Monterey County Weekly 07 Mar 2019. Web. 20 Oct 2021 Laguna Grande Regional Park Master Plan and EIR Addendum. J.P. Manacheck, A.I.A., and Charles R Haugh. 1978
Land Use Plan for the Laguna Grande/Roberts Lake Local Coastal Program. Duncan and Jones. 1981
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 260, Packet Page 289 Existing Conditions | 3
EXISTING CONDITIONS 02
The following section is a summary of information compiled from several field studies conducted by the consultant, interviews with staff from the City of Monterey, City of Seaside and Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District, and review of maps and plans prepared previously for Laguna Grande Regional Park. The field studies focused on vegetation and sensitive habitat, park physical features, review of park conditions for accessibility and observations of park uses by the public.

Many of the studies confirmed the Park is a rich resource for wildlife, vegetation and provides the community with a diverse range of programmed uses. There are several areas of the park which are used for illegal camping and this has resulted in park safety concerns and a substantial amount of trash and debris collecting in sensitive habitat areas. Interviews with maintenance staff, fire officials and other officials has confirmed the Consultant team findings.

In order to provide a clear understanding of the park and its specific areas, below is a map highlighting key features and the areas that will be discussed throughout this plan.

NORTH
EAST
SOUTH
Riparian
Woodland
BBQ / Picnic Area Riparian
Woodland
Maintenance
Yard
Traditional
Park
Soccer
Field
Stage
Laguna Grande
Lake
Virgin Ave.

English Ave.

Cassanova Ave. Grant Ave.

Montecito Ave.

Branner Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont Blvd.

Del Monte Blvd.

Harcourt Ave.

Sonoma Ave.

Encina Ave.

English Ave.

Traditional
Park
St. Seraphim’s
Church
Chili’s
Embassy Suites
by Hilton
Holiday Inn
Express
In-N-Out
Burger
WEST
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 261, Packet Page 290 4 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY

AESTHETICS
Laguna Grande Regional Park is a unique
aquatic landscape situated between
Monterey and Seaside. There are clear views
into the park from Canyon Del Rey Boulevard
to the east and from the surrounding
neighborhoods to the west. Interior views
include: the lake, native aquatic bird species,
low woodlands, and rolling grassy hills. The
south end of the Park has elevated hillsides,
that provide views toward the Bay.

ACCESS AND CIRCULATION
The Park provides multiple pedestrian and vehicular access points with the exception of the southern end. The southern end of the park has no accessible pedestrian or vehicular access connecting to Fremont Boulevard. An existing set of stairs leads down into the park near Canyon Del Rey Boulevard.

There are no sidewalk connections to the stairs from Canyon Del Rey Boulevard or Fremont Boulevard.

Parking around the lake is facilitated with three public parking lots, two on the east and one on the west, as well as street parking on the west. Pedestrian connections to park trails are accessible from multiple points, two off of Del Monte Boulevard, four off of Canyon Del Rey Boulevard, and four off of Virgin Avenue. Trails connect to a central loop that runs along the perimeter of the lake. There is a wide path that leads to the south end of the park and dead ends with stairs which lead up to Fremont Boulevard. Secondary paths on the east and west sides of the park connect to the main loop around the lake. See Circulation Map Figure 01.

TRAIL SURFACE/MATERIAL CONDITIONS
The Park has a number of trail materials including: asphalt, concrete, gravel, decomposed granite (DG), boardwalks, and mulch. The general trail conditions are good due to weekly maintenance and repairs from the cities. All trails have been kept clear of vegetation allowing easy access. See Trail Conditions Map Figure 02.

The majority of park trails are asphalt and conditions vary. There are two areas that have been heavily impacted by root growth and become areas of concern for accessibility and safety that need replacement. Along the asphalt trails there are many areas where the edge of the path, particularly on the lake side, is deteriorating. Some areas impacted by erosion and root damage have been clearly demarcated by maintenance staff for public safety.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 262, Packet Page 291 Existing Conditions | 5
Asphalt Trail Root Impacts Asphalt Trail in Poor Condition The use of concrete throughout the park has been limited to restroom facilities and at bridge abutments on the north end of the park. The concrete throughout the park is in good condition, however, in some locations where the trail transitions from concrete to DG, rutting has occurred.

Gravel has only been used for the trail that runs to the south end of the park. This portion of the trail has been well maintained is in good condition.

DG has been used on the northwest side of the park running from the end of the traditional park on the west side up to the In-N-Out Burger to the north. The DG path has been well maintained and is in good condition with no root impacts or erosion.

Gravel Trail DG Trail Mulch Trail
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 263, Packet Page 292 6 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY Wood decking is limited to the two bridges and five piers around the lake. These appear to be in good condition. Accessibility to these bridges and piers varies greatly. Many of the piers are inaccessible to wheelchairs due to grade change, as well as connections to the main trail that are too steep or narrow. The bridge at the north end of the park is not considered accessible by code.

The mulch trails are seasonal and
have been limited to the riparian
woodland along the northwest
edge of the lake. These trails
vary in width and condition,
with some portions of the trail
subsiding into wet soil. The
application of new mulch has
kept much of the trail in good
condition.

Bridge Boardwalk

ADJACENT ACTIVITIES / SURROUNDING LAND USE
The main trail loop is surrounded by a diverse set of land uses and activities. The north end of the park is adjacent to privately owned hotels, fast food and drive-in restaurants.

On the east side adjacent to Canyon Del Rey Boulevard there is a traditional neighborhood park with an event lawn and stage, restroom facility, and playground. There is also is a private parcel with St.

Seraphim’s Russian Orthodox church, which is accessed through the park.

Seaside Playground
Image Credit: https://filmmonterey.org
St. Seraphim’s Church
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 264, Packet Page 293 Existing Conditions | 7
The southern portion of the park consists
predominately of a riparian woodland and creek
that are largely inaccessible to the public. South
of the church are grassy slopes with BBQ / picnic
areas and strolling paths. At the very southern
tip of the park, adjacent to Fremont Boulevard,
is a maintenance and storage yard for the city of
Seaside.

Seaside BBQ/Picnic Area
The western edge of the park also has traditional park programming with a synthetic turf soccer field, restroom facility, playground, synthetic turf volleyball court, BBQ and picnic areas. There is also a riparian woodland with seasonal mulch trails.

Monterey Volleyball Court Monterey Soccer Field

TOPOGRAPHY
The property rises from 12-feet above sea level at the lake water level to 50-feet above sea level at the southern end along Fremont Boulevard and Laguna Grande Court. The southern end of the park functions like a valley between two 30-foot slopes to the east, south and west. The slopes level out as they move north towards the lake. The majority of the site sits 6-feet to 8-feet above the lake water level and is relatively flat and accessible.

VEGETATION
The Park, with its unique aquatic features, hosts a wide variety of vegetation. Much of this vegetation is native to the region and provides habitat for various wildlife but has been impacted by the spread of invasive species. See appendix A and B. Vegetation is maintained by the cities on a weekly basis with a focus on the traditional park areas. Special maintenance activities, such as tree limbing and trail clearing, are performed a few times throughout the year. Dense vegetation throughout the park obstructs sight lines along the trail and to the docks and is a safety concern.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 265, Packet Page 294 8 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY Invasive Giant Reed and French Broom Native Lavatera assurgentiflora - Island Mallow Refer to Appendix A – Laguna Grande Focused Plant Survey (EMC) Refer to Appendix B – Invasive Plant Control (EMC and BRG)

WILDLIFE AND SENSITIVE SPECIES
Refer to Appendix C – Wildlife Analysis (EMC)

GENERAL MAINTENANCE
The Park is generally visited daily to clean restrooms and provide a quick visual check of park conditions. Operations improvements are scheduled weekly or monthly depending on the season.

However, over the years persistent homeless encampments have considerably grown and become more permanent. City of Seaside staff are now checking encampments one to two times per week.

Shelters, however, have tunneled deeper into the thickets to avoid easy observation. The increasing population has alarmed neighbors and created water quality and safety hazards for park visitors.

Encampments in Woods
Image Credit: City of Seaside
Encampments in Thickets
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 266, Packet Page 295 EXISTING CONDITIONS | 9
LEGEND
Main Trail Loop
South Trail
Secondary Trails
Seasonal Trails
Social Trails
Stairs
Pedestrian Access
Vehicular Access
Virgin Ave.

English Ave.

Cassanova Ave. Grant Ave.

Montecito Ave. Branner Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont Blvd.

Del Monte Blvd.

Harcourt Ave.

Sonoma Ave.

Encina Ave.

English Ave.

Laguna Grande Lake

CITY OFMONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROJECT BOUNDARY
LEGEND
Main Trail Loop
South Trail
Secondary Trails
Seasonal Trails
Social Trails
Stairs
Pedestrian Access
Vehicular Access
Virgin Ave.

English Ave.

Cassanova Ave. Grant Ave.

Montecito Ave. Branner Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont
Blvd.

Del Mo
nte
Blvd.

Harcourt Ave.

Sonoma Ave.

Encina Ave.

English Ave.

Laguna Grande Lake

CITY OFMONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
TY O

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROJECT BOUNDARYPROJEC

PROJECT BOUNDARY
PROJEC

T BOUNDARY
FIGURE 1: LAGUNA GRANDE REGIONAL PARK CIRCULATION
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 267, Packet Page 296 10 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY LEGEND
Trail in Good Condition
Trail in Fair Condition -
will need repaired/
replaced in next 5 years
Trail in Poor Condition -
will need replaced within
the next 2 years
Virgin Ave.

English Ave.

Cassanova Ave. Grant Ave.

Montecito Ave. Branner Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont Blvd.

Del Monte Blvd.

Harcourt Ave.

Sonoma Ave.

Encina Ave.

English Ave.

Laguna Grande Lake

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROJECT BOUNDARY
LEGEND
Trail in Good Condition
Trail in Fair Condition -
will need repaired/
replaced in next 5 years
Trail in Poor Condition -
will need replaced within
the next 2 years
Virgin Ave.

English Ave.

Cassanova Ave. Grant Ave.

Montecito Ave. Branner Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont
Blvd.

Del Mo
nte
Blvd.

Harcourt Ave.

Sonoma Ave.

Encina Ave.

English Ave.

Laguna Grande Lake

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

PROJECT BOUNDARY
PROJEC

T BOUNDARY
PROJEC

PROJECT BOUNDARY
PROJEC

T BOUNDARY
FIGURE 2: LAGUNA GRANDE REGIONAL PARK TRAIL CONDITIONS
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 268, Packet Page 297 EXISTING CONDITIONS | 11
Montecito Ave. Branner Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont Blvd.

Del Monte Blvd.

Harcourt Ave.

Sonoma Ave.

English Ave.

Laguna Grande Lake

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
LEGEND
MPRPD Parcels
Parcel Boundaries
Monterey Parcels
Seaside Parcels
Private Parcels
Right of Way
Montecito Ave. Branner Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Charles
Williams
Ave.

Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont
Blvd.

Del Monte Blvd.

Harcourt Ave.

Sonoma Ave.

English Ave.

Laguna Grande Lake
EREY

CITY OF MONT
IDE

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
LEGEND
MPRPD Parcels
Parcel Boundaries
Monterey Parcels
Seaside Parcels
Private Parcels
Right of Way
Virgin Ave.

English Ave.

Cassanova Ave. Grant Ave.

Encina Ave.

Parcels Not Included in
Project
PAR-1
PAR-2
PAR-3
PAR-4
PAR-1
PAR-1
PAR-1 PAR-1
PAR-1
PAR-1
PAR-1
PAR-1
PAR-1
PAR-2
PAR-2
PAR-2 PAR-2 PAR-2 PAR-2 PAR-2 PAR-2
PAR-3
PAR-3 PAR-3
PAR-3
PAR-3
PAR-3
PAR-3
PAR-3
PAR-3
PAR-3
PAR-3
PAR-3
PAR-4
PAR-4
PAR-4
PAR-4
PAR-4
PAR-1

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROJECT BOUNDARY
FIGURE 3: LAGUNA GRANDE REGIONAL PARK PARCEL OWNERSHIP
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 269, Packet Page 298 12 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 270, Packet Page 299 Future Planning | 13
FUTURE PLANNING 03
Several projects are being planned and designed in and around Laguna Grande Regional Park. Many of these projects revolve around improving trails and multi-use corridors within and around the park which will improve regional trail connectivity and create safe connections along busy street corridors.

In addition to improving trails and multi-use corridors, an update to the Laguna Grande Regional Park Master Plan, dated 1978, is forthcoming. Two significant projects which will affect the park are the North Fremont Street Sidewalk Gap Closure Project and the Fort Ord Trail and Greenway (FORTAG) Canyon Del Rey/SR 218 Segment Project
North Fremont Street Sidewalk Gap Closure Project: In the summer of 2021 the City of Monterey introduced an improvement project which will construct a multi-use ADA accessible bicycle and pedestrian path along North Fremont Street between Casanova Avenue and Canyon Dey Rey Blvd. The project includes a bridge that will link the existing sidewalk and Class IV bicycle lane to the future Fort Ord Trail and Greenway (FORTAG) project. Currently the gap closure project is going through the required environmental review process and the City of Monterey is looking to secure grant funding to complete construction. This planned improvement will greatly benefit the Park. Residents will be able to utilize Fremont Street by either walking or biking and connect directly into the park at the corner of Fremont Street and Canyon Del Rey Boulevard. This project will then link to the FORTAG Project which is planned to traverse through LGRP.

Fort Ord Trail and Greenway (FORTAG) Canyon Del Rey/SR 218 Segment Project: The FORTAG Canyon Del Rey/SR 218 Segment Project is a part of a much larger trail system that will connect the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail, the trails of the Fort Ord National Monument and the Coastal Rec Trail into a continuous system. Spearheaded by a group of private citizens, FORTAG has many stakeholders including the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC). Part of the FORTAG Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 271, Packet Page 300 14 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY Canyon Del Rey/SR 218 Segment is planned to travel through LGRP, utilizing the existing trail system. At the north end of the end park the trail users will be provided a safe crossing at Del Monte Boulevard connecting LGRP to Roberts Lake and at the south end of the park the trail will provide much needed accessibility improvements taking trail users up to the corner of Fremont Street and Canyon Del Rey Boulevard. The anticipated trail improvements, because of the FORTAG project, will greatly benefit the park through the widening of existing trails and paving improvements improving accessibility. In March 2020, TAMC certified the FORTAG Final Environmental Impact Report and in October of 2020 Phase 1 of the Canyon Del Rey/SR 218 Segment Project was funded for engineering design and community outreach. Phase 1 of this segment covers Fremont Street to Carlton Drive.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 272, Packet Page 301 FUTURE PLANNING | 15
LEGEND
Proposed FORTAG
Trail Alignment
Phase 2 Trail Alignment
*Trail enhanced for visual clarity. See
FORTAG Conceptual Design Report for
approved trail alignment.

Virgin Ave.

English Ave.

Cassanova Ave. Grant Ave.

Encina Ave.

Montecito Ave. Branner Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont Blvd.

Del Monte Blvd.

Harcourt Ave.

Sonoma Ave.

English Ave.

Laguna Grande Lake

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
FORTAG Trail Alignmnet per the FORTAG
Conceptual Design Report - September 2020
Ã218
Ave
Fremont St
Del

MONTEREY
!C

LAGUNA GRANDE

REGIONA
L
PARK

ROBERTS LAKE
DEL R
[
Phase 1
Phase 2

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROJECT BOUNDARY
LEGEND
Proposed FORTAG
Trail Alignment
Phase 2 Trail Alignment
*Trail enhanced for visual clarity. See
FORTAG Conceptual Design Report for
approved trail alignment.

Virgin Ave.

English Ave.

Cassanova Ave. Grant Ave.

Encina Ave.

Montecito Ave. Branner Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont
Blvd.

De
l Monte Blvd.

Harcourt Ave.

Sonoma Ave.

English Ave.

Laguna Grande Lake

CITY OF MONTEREY

TY OF MO

CITY OF SEASIDE

TY OF SEAS

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
FORTAG Trail Alignmnet per the FORTAG
Conceptual Design Report - September 2020
Ã
e
Fremont St
D

MONTEREY
!

LAGUNA GRANDE

REGIONA
LA
PARK

ROBERTS LAKE
DEL
[
Phase 1
Phase 2 Pha

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROJECT BOUNDARYPROJEC

PROJECT BOUNDARY
PROJEC
T

BOUNDARY
FIGURE 4: FORTAG TRAIL - CANYON DEL REY/SR2I8 SEGMENT
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 273, Packet Page 302 16 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 274, Packet Page 303 Community Outreach | 17
COMMUNITY OUTREACH 04
In order to provide equitable engagement to the community within the planning process, the project team set up a website, haveyoursaymonterey.org, to allow community members of varying backgrounds and ages equal opportunity to comment and engage with the plans. Community meetings, public comments, plan drafts and design team meeting minutes were all made available throughout the planning process.

The opportunity for stakeholder and community engagement included a virtual townhall held on July 28, 2021 and a community site walk held on August 14, 2021. The virtual townhall, with 40 people in attendance, provided the community with an introduction to the planning process and key objectives. Community members were invited to provide comments. Key priorities heard from the community included:
• Improve park safety
• Address and fix accessibility issues
• Maintain and improve planting
• Disclose all funding sources for improvements
• Engage neighboring businesses adjacent to the Park
After the townhall, the community was invited to participate in a site walk around the Park. The project team engaged with community members and were able to address specific concerns throughout the park. There was a total of 32 people in attendance. Key takeaways from the site walk include:
• Unauthorized encampments are a personal safety, water quality, and fire danger security issue • Design focus should be on accessibility improvements and vegetation maintenance • Desire for clear sight lines along trails
• Protect and extend habitat areas and resources
• Aesthetic upgrades are not a priority – the park is generally well maintained • Community should continue to be involved in the decision-making process • Funding sources

OUTREACH SUMMARY
The virtual town hall was recorded and made public on haveyoursaymonterey.org. A video of the site walk was created and also posted to the project website. Fliers and meeting minutes and materials for community engagement events can be seen in Appendix D. Opportunities for public comment and input will continue throughout the planning process.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 275, Packet Page 304 18 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 276, Packet Page 305 Community ommunity Outreach utreach | 19

LAGUNA GRANDE

SEASIDE

CANYON DEL REY BOULEVARD

NORTH FREMONT STREET

MONTEREY

DEL MONTE AVENUE
CASANOVA AVE.

ENGLISH AVE.

VIRGIN AVE.

HILBY AVE.

HARCOUT AVE.

SONOMA AVE.

NORTH FREMONT STREET

CANYON DEL REY BOULEVARD
WILLIAMS AVE.

GRANT AVE.

MONTECITO AVE.

BRANNER AVE.

L. GRANDE CT.

FORTAG TRAIL ALIGNMENT OPTIONS
Caminata por el sitio
de la communidad
Laguna Grande
Sábado, 14 de agosto de 2021
10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
https://haveyoursaymonterey.org/laguna-grande-park-plan Nos reuniremos en Hillside BBQ, espacio #1
Estacionamiento en Eucalyptus
Estamos buscando ideas y sugerencias
sobre el mantenimiento de los senderos y de
la vegetación del parque Laguna Grande
Seeking public input on the maintenance of
trails and vegetation at Laguna Grande Park
Meet at Hillside BBQ Space #1
Parking at the Eucalyptus Lot
Laguna Grande Park
Community Site Walk
Saturday, August 14th 2021
10 AM - 12:00 PM
https://haveyoursaymonterey.org/laguna-grande-park-plan FIGURE 5: LAGUNA GRANDE REGIONAL PARK COMMUNITY SITE WALK Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 277, Packet Page 306 20 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY FIGURE 6: LAGUNA GRANDE REGIONAL PARK COMMUNITY SITE WALK Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 278, Packet Page 307 Goals | 21
GOALS 05
The purpose of the Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy (Strategy) is to provide the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) a clear set of priorities and means for maintaining the trails and vegetation throughout the Park. The proposed Plan will implement maintenance strategies to create a more accessible, safe, and long-lasting park for the surrounding community and region. Laguna Grande Regional Park is a unique landscape within the cities of Monterey and Seaside, providing visitors access to rarely seen aquatic and migratory birds, riparian vegetation, and fresh water lakes. Increased maintenance will require an intentional and thoughtful approach. The proposed Strategy provides direction to meet the regulations for maintenance of sensitive habitats and around bodies of water set forth by the State and Federal government agencies.

1. ADDRESS ENCAMPMENT, HEALTH AND SAFETY CONCERNS
• Provide seasonal trails through south riparian woods for consistent monitoring • Access and Monitoring: clear non-native vegetation and overgrown brush to discourage illegal camping and provide maintenance for emergency services foot access Black Crowned Night Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax)
Image Credit: www.reconnectwithnature.org
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 279, Packet Page 308 22 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY

2. IMPROVE PERSONAL SAFETY
• Access and Monitoring: clear vegetation and overgrown brush to increase public visibility and surveillance and discourage illegal camping; provide on-going maintenance for access and clean up.
• Sightline Visibility: create clear sight lines at curves and corners by limbing trees and clearing understory
• Accessibility Improvements: trail maintenance and repair • Repair existing lighting and extend new lighting where park trail has no ambient street light

3. MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE QUALITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES
• Preserve and protect existing habitat
• Remove invasive vegetation where practical
• Mitigate habitat disturbance from vegetation removal as deemed appropriate at a 3:1 replacement ratio
Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos)
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 280, Packet Page 309 Overall Plan | 23
OVERALL PLAN 06

TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY
The north side of the Park has a looped trail around the lake with direct neighborhood access and parking for visitors. This segment of the Park is well visited. The south end, extending back to Fremont Boulevard, does not have a looped path or easy neighborhood access. As a result, the dense vegetation has attracted homeless encampments. Warming fires are a concern to neighbors.

Park visitors feel threatened by itinerant groups and observed drug exchanges.

Overall, residents feel the looped trail and active park areas are generally well maintained. Seaside and Monterey have been attentive to community needs in the primary recreation spaces. The JPA focus should begin with the southern half of the park.

As described in other sections of this report, any disturbance of identified habitat areas will be mitigated by habitat enhancement elsewhere in the park. Annually, a description and map of probable disturbance and enhancement will be submitted to the JPA for approval.

In order to meet the Goals and priorities above, the following maintenance strategies are recommended for Laguna Grande Regional Park.

1. SEASONAL TRAIL DEVELOPMENT
• Provide 8’ wide seasonal mulch trails through southern riparian woodland with seasonal foot bridges for creek crossing
• Mitigate habitat removal with invasive removal and restoration planting

2. VEGETATION CLEARING
• Clearing and limbing around trail curves and corners
• Clearing at docks
• Clearing and limbing around illegal camp sites to improve access for monitoring and cleaning • Mitigate habitat removal with invasive removal and restoration planting

3. TRAIL MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS
• Replace sections of trail impacted by root damage
• Repair edges of trail impacted by erosion – install header or curb to maintain trail edge along the lakeside.
• Add mulch seasonally to portions of seasonal trail that are degraded • Repair or replace culverts under trail
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 281, Packet Page 310 24 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY • Provide formal trail connection to Fremont St
• Provide formal trail connection along Virgin St

4. ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS
• Restore accessibility to north bridge - make compliant with local building codes • Repair areas with trip hazards
• Install accessible paths to docks - make compliant with local building codes • Provide accessible ingress/egress to Laguna Grande from Fremont St.

5. INVASIVE SPECIES REMOVAL AND RESTORATION PLANTING
• Priority 1 (1-3 years)
• Priority 2 (1-5 years)
• Priority 3 (6-10 years)
• Priorities 4-5
• Priority 6 (no action)
• Restore native plantings where invasives are fully removed • Create new native habitat along southern gravel trail

6. LIGHTING
• Repair or replace existing lighting
• Extend new lighting along the southern gravel trail
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 282, Packet Page 311 OVERALL PLAN | 25
Invasive Species Clearing
Clearing - Priority 1 (1-3 years)
Clearing - Priority 4/5
Priority 6 - No Action
Clearing - Priority 2 (1-5 years)
Restore Planting at Invasive
Clearing Areas
Clearing - Priority 3 (6-10 years)
Habitat Removal Mitigation Planting
Replace Trail Impacted by Roots
Trail Maintenance and Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
Lighting
Repair Edge of Trail - Erosion
Add Mulch to Seasonal Trail
Restore Trail Accessibility
Repair/Replace Existing Lighting
Repair/replace Culverts
Extend New Lighting
Provide Formal Trail Connection
LEGEND
Enhance Existing Social Trails
Similar to Seasonal Trails
Seasonal Mulch Trail to Finish
Loop
Vegetation Clearing
Clear and Limb
South Woods Seasonal Trail Development
Clearing of Vegetation and
Debris Consistent with Current
Maintenance Practices
Accessibility Improvements per
FORTAG Trail Alignment. See
Figure 3.

Invasive Species Clearing
Clearing - Priority 1 (1-3 years)
Clearing - Priority 4/5
Priority 6 - No Action
Clearing - Priority 2 (1-5 years)
Restore Planting at Invasive
Clearing Areas
Clearing - Priority 3 (6-10 years)
Habitat Removal Mitigation Planting
Replace Trail Impacted by Roots
Trail Maintenance and Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
Lighting
Repair Edge of Trail - Erosion
Add Mulch to Seasonal Trail
Restore Trail Accessibility
Repair/Replace Existing Lighting
Repair/replace Culverts
Extend New Lighting
Provide Formal Trail Connection
LEGEND
Enhance Existing Social Trails
Similar to Seasonal Trails
Seasonal Mulch Trail to Finish
Loop
Vegetation Clearing
Clear and Limb
South Woods Seasonal Trail Development
Clearing of Vegetation and
Debris Consistent with Current
Maintenance Practices
Accessibility Improvements per
FORTAG Trail Alignment. See
Figure 3.

PROJECT BOUNDARY
TRM-1
TRM-1
TRM-1
TRM-2
TRM-2
TRM-2
TRM-2
TRM-2
TRM-2
TRM-1
TRM-1
TRM-3
TRM-2
TRM-4
TRM-5
ADA-1
ADA-1
ADA-1
ADA-1
ADA-1
ADA-1
VEG-1
VEG-1
VEG-1
VEG-1
VEG-1
VEG-1
VEG-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-2
ISR-2
ISR-2
ISR-2
ISR-2
ISR-2
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
LGT-1
LGT-1
LGT-2
LGT-2
LGT-2
ISR-1
TRM-5
TRM-2
TRM-3
TRM-3
TRM-3
ISR-1
ISR-4
TRM-1
TRM-1
ISR-2
ISR-2
ISR-4
RES
RES
RES
RES
TRM-2
QTY 4
QTY 7
QTY 34
QTY 27
LGT-2 QTY 17
QTY 2
LGT-2 QTY 3
TRM-1
ADA-1
STR-1
ISR-1
ISR-2
ISR-3
ISR-4
ISR-5
RES
MIT
LGT-2
TRM-2
ADA-2
TRM-3
TRM-4
STR-2
VEG-1
VEG-2
TRM-5
LGT-1

MATCHLINE - SOUTH
Virgin Ave.

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

English Ave.

Harcourt Ave. Branner Ave.

Montecito Ave.

Grant Ave.

Laguna Grande Lake
Existing Turf
Parking
Existing Soccer Field
Parking
Parking
Existing
Turf
Encina Ave.

Virgin Ave.

MATCHLINE - SOUTH

PROJECT BOUNDARY

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
FIGURE 7: OVERALL PLAN - NORTH
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 283, Packet Page 312 26 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY Invasive Species Clearing
Clearing - Priority 1 (1-3 years)
Clearing - Priority 4/5
Priority 6 - No Action
Clearing - Priority 2 (1-5 years)
Restore Planting at Invasive
Clearing Areas
Clearing - Priority 3 (6-10 years)
Habitat Removal Mitigation Planting
Replace Trail Impacted by Roots
Trail Maintenance and Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
Lighting
Repair Edge of Trail - Erosion
Add Mulch to Seasonal Trail
Restore Trail Accessibility
Repair/Replace Existing Lighting
Repair/replace Culverts
Extend New Lighting
Provide Formal Trail Connection
LEGEND
Enhance Existing Social Trails
Similar to Seasonal Trails
See Figure 8 for the South Woods
Seasonal Trail Development Plan
Seasonal Mulch Trail to Finish
Loop
Vegetation Clearing
Clear and Limb
South Woods Seasonal Trail Development
Clearing of Vegetation and
Debris Consistent with Current
Maintenance Practices
Accessibility Improvements per
FORTAG Trail Alignment. See
Figure 3.

Invasive Species Clearing
Clearing - Priority 1 (1-3 years)
Clearing - Priority 4/5
Priority 6 - No Action
Clearing - Priority 2 (1-5 years)
Restore Planting at Invasive
Clearing Areas
Clearing - Priority 3 (6-10 years)
Habitat Removal Mitigation Planting
Replace Trail Impacted by Roots
Trail Maintenance and Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
Lighting
Repair Edge of Trail - Erosion
Add Mulch to Seasonal Trail
Restore Trail Accessibility
Repair/Replace Existing Lighting
Repair/replace Culverts
Extend New Lighting
Provide Formal Trail Connection
LEGEND
Enhance Existing Social Trails
Similar to Seasonal Trails
See Figure 8 for the South Woods
Seasonal Trail Development Plan
Seasonal Mulch Trail to Finish
Loop
Vegetation Clearing
Clear and Limb
South Woods Seasonal Trail Development
Clearing of Vegetation and
Debris Consistent with Current
Maintenance Practices
Accessibility Improvements per
FORTAG Trail Alignment. See
Figure 3.

MATCHLINE - NORTH

MATCHLINE - NORTH
TRM-1
ADA-1
STR-1
ISR-1
ISR-2
ISR-3
ISR-4
ISR-5
RES
MIT
LGT-2
TRM-5
VEG-1
VEG-1
VEG-2
VEG-2
STR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-2
ISR-3
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-4
ISR-5
ISR-5
MIT
LGT-2
ISR-4
ISR-1
ISR-2
TRM-5
ADA-2
TRM-5
TRM-1
TRM-2
RES

RES RES
QTY 13
LGT-2 QTY 36
ADA-2
STR-2
STR-2
TRM-3
TRM-4
STR-2
VEG-1
VEG-2
TRM-5
LGT-1
STR-2
STR-2
STR-1
Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont Blvd.

English Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Cassanova Ave.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

PROJECT BOUNDARY

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
Laguna Grande Lake
BBQ / Picnic Area
1 1
1 1
1 1
FIGURE 8: OVERALL PLAN - SOUTH
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 284, Packet Page 313 OVERALL PLAN | 27
Invasive Species Clearing
Clearing - Priority 1 (1-3 years)
Clearing - Priority 4/5
Priority 6 - No Action
Clearing - Priority 2 (1-5 years)
Restore Planting at Invasive
Clearing Areas
Clearing - Priority 3 (6-10 years)
Habitat Removal Mitigation Planting
Replace Trail Impacted by Roots
Trail Maintenance and Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
Lighting
Repair Edge of Trail - Erosion
Add Mulch to Seasonal Trail
Restore Trail Accessibility
Repair/Replace Existing Lighting
Repair/replace Culverts
Extend New Lighting
Provide Formal Trail Connection
LEGEND
Enhance Existing Social Trails
Similar to Seasonal Trails
See Figure 8 for the South Woods
Seasonal Trail Development Plan
Seasonal Mulch Trail to Finish
Loop
Vegetation Clearing
Clear and Limb
South Woods Seasonal Trail Development
Clearing of Vegetation and
Debris Consistent with Current
Maintenance Practices
Accessibility Improvements per
FORTAG Trail Alignment. See
Figure 3. MATCHLINE - NORTH MATCHLINE - NORTH
TRM-1
ADA-1
STR-1
RES
MIT
LGT-2
VEG-1
VEG-2
VEG-2
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-2
ISR-3
ISR-4
ISR-5
LGT-2
ISR-4
TRM-5
ADA-2
TRM-5 TRM-2
RES
RES
QTY 13
LGT-2 QTY 36
ADA-2
STR-2
STR-2
TRM-3
TRM-4
STR-2
VEG-1
VEG-2
TRM-5
LGT-1
Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont Blvd.

English Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Cassanova Ave.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

PROJECT BOUNDARY

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
Laguna Grande Lake
BBQ / Picnic Area
1 1
1 1
1 1
Invasive Species Clearing
Clearing - Priority 1 (1-3 years)
Clearing - Priority 4/5
Priority 6 - No Action
Clearing - Priority 2 (1-5 years)
Restore Planting at Invasive
Clearing Areas
Clearing - Priority 3 (6-10 years)
Habitat Removal Mitigation Planting
Replace Trail Impacted by Roots
Trail Maintenance and Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
Lighting
Repair Edge of Trail - Erosion
Add Mulch to Seasonal Trail
Restore Trail Accessibility
Repair/Replace Existing Lighting
Repair/replace Culverts
Extend New Lighting
Provide Formal Trail Connection
LEGEND
Enhance Existing Social Trails
Similar to Seasonal Trails
See Figure 8 for the South Woods
Seasonal Trail Development Plan
Seasonal Mulch Trail to Finish
Loop
Vegetation Clearing
Clear and Limb
South Woods Seasonal Trail Development
Clearing of Vegetation and
Debris Consistent with Current
Maintenance Practices
Accessibility Improvements per
FORTAG Trail Alignment. See
Figure 3. MATCHLINE - NORTH MATCHLINE - NORTH
TRM-1
ADA-1
STR-1
RES
MIT
LGT-2
VEG-1
VEG-2
VEG-2
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-2
ISR-3
ISR-4
ISR-5
LGT-2
ISR-4
TRM-5
ADA-2
TRM-5 TRM-2
RES
RES
QTY 13
LGT-2 QTY 36
ADA-2
STR-2
STR-2
TRM-3
TRM-4
STR-2
VEG-1
VEG-2
TRM-5
LGT-1
Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont Blvd.

English Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Cassanova Ave.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

PROJECT BOUNDARY

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
Laguna Grande Lake
BBQ / Picnic Area
1 1
1 1
1 1
FIGURE 9: SOUTH WOODS SEASONAL TRAIL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Invasive Species Clearing
Clearing - Priority 1 (1-3 years)
Clearing - Priority 4/5
Priority 6 - No Action
Clearing - Priority 2 (1-5 years)
Restore Planting at Invasive
Clearing Areas
Clearing - Priority 3 (6-10 years)
Habitat Removal Mitigation Planting
Replace Trail Impacted by Roots
Trail Maintenance and Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
Lighting
Repair Edge of Trail - Erosion
Add Mulch to Seasonal Trail
Restore Trail Accessibility
Repair/Replace Existing Lighting
Repair/replace Culverts
Extend New Lighting
Provide Formal Trail Connection
LEGEND
Enhance Existing Social Trails
Similar to Seasonal Trails
See Figure 8 for the South Woods
Seasonal Trail Development Plan
Seasonal Mulch Trail to Finish
Loop
Vegetation Clearing
Clear and Limb
South Woods Seasonal Trail Development
Clearing of Vegetation and
Debris Consistent with Current
Maintenance Practices
Accessibility Improvements per
FORTAG Trail Alignment. See
Figure 3. MATCHLINE - NORTH MATCHLINE - NORTH
TRM-1
ADA-1
STR-1
RES
MIT
LGT-2
VEG-1
VEG-2
VEG-2
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-1
ISR-2
ISR-3
ISR-4
ISR-5
LGT-2
ISR-4
TRM-5
ADA-2
TRM-5 TRM-2
RES
RES
QTY 13
LGT-2 QTY 36
ADA-2
STR-2
STR-2
TRM-3
TRM-4
STR-2
VEG-1
VEG-2
TRM-5
LGT-1
Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont Blvd.

English Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Cassanova Ave.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

PROJECT BOUNDARY

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
Laguna Grande Lake
BBQ / Picnic Area
1 1
1 1
1 1
LEGEND
Existing Park Trail - Enhance
trail section and width for Type
¿UHWUXFN3RWHQWLDOIXQGLQJ
WKURXJK0HDVXUH;

3URYLGH¿UHWUXFNWXUQDURXQGDW
HQGRIWUDLO3RWHQWLDOIXQGLQJ
WKURXJK0HDVXUH;

6HDVRQDO0XOFK7UDLOV/)
&OHDUIRRWWUDLOZLWKPXOFKWRS
GUHVVLQJ&OHDUYHJHWDWLRQDV
UHTXLUHG

0HDVXUH;ZDVDWD[LQFUHDVHPHDVXUH
ZKLFKZDVDSSURYHGLQDQGLV
PDQDJHGXQGHUWKH7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ$JHQF\
RI0RQWHUH\&RXQW\
7$0&

6HDVRQDO)RRW%ULGJH
Existing Creek
([LVWLQJ6RFLDO7UDLOV/)
$GRSWDV6HDVRQDO0XOFK7UDLOV
Widen to 8 feet and clear
YHJHWDWLRQDVUHTXLUHG
LEGEND
Existing Park Trail - Enhance
trail section and width for Type
¿UHWUXFN3RWHQWLDOIXQGLQJ
WKURXJK0HDVXUH;

3URYLGH¿UHWUXFNWXUQDURXQGDW
HQGRIWUDLO3RWHQWLDOIXQGLQJ
WKURXJK0HDVXUH;

6HDVRQDO0XOFK7UDLOV/)
&OHDUIRRWWUDLOZLWKPXOFKWRS
GUHVVLQJ&OHDUYHJHWDWLRQDV
UHTXLUHG

MATCHLINE - NORTH

MATCHLINE - NORTH
Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

Fremont Blvd.

English Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Cassanova Ave.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROJECT BOUNDARY
¶´ PROJECT BOUNDARY
¶´
¶´
¶´
¶´
¶´
¶´
¶´

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
/DJXQD*UDQGH/DNH %%43LFQLF$UHD
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 285, Packet Page 314 28 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 286, Packet Page 315 Phase One Implementation | 29
PHASE ONE IMPLEMENTATION 07
Implementation of the recommended maintenance and improvements will require time and approval from the governing agencies. The design team is recommending a phased approach to Strategy implementation in order to alleviate costs and to obtain permit approvals. With safety as the top priority, phase one will address these issues first. Many of the safety issues directly correlate with overgrown vegetation. Vegetation clearing and removal will require permits, but can easily be incorporated into weekly maintenance routines. Other safety items to be addressed include repairing trails heavily impacted by root damage and erosion and clearing defensible space for fire safety.

1. SEASONAL TRAIL DEVELOPMENT
• Provide 8’ wide seasonal mulch trail through southern riparian woodland with seasonal foot bridges for creek crossing. Connect from the gravel trail to English and Sequoia • Mitigate habitat removal with invasive removal and restoration planting • Invasive Species Removal and Restoration Planting:
• Priority 1 (1-3 years):
– Clear invasives where vegetation clearing for safety and defensible space will already be happening.
– Clear invasive species where necessary to mitigate habitat removal • Restore native plantings where invasive species have been fully removed

2. VEGETATION CLEARING
• Clearing and limbing around trail curves and corners particularly in the northwest riparian woodland
• Clearing at docks
• Clearing and limbing around illegal camp sites
• Mitigate habitat removal with invasive removal and restoration planting

3. TRAIL MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS
• Replace sections of trail impacted by root damage – trail section along Canyon Del Rey in Seaside traditional park and trail section along soccer field in Monterey traditional park

4. ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS
• Restore accessibility compliance to north bridge
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 287, Packet Page 316 30 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 288, Packet Page 317 PHASE ONE IMPLEMENTATION | 31
FIGURE 10: PHASE ONE PLAN - NORTH
Invasive Species Clearing
Clearing - Priority 1 (1-3 years)
Clearing - Priority 4/5
Priority 6 - No Action
Clearing - Priority 2 (1-5 years)
Restore Planting at Invasive
Clearing Areas
Clearing - Priority 3 (6-10 years)
Habitat Removal Mitigation Planting
Replace Trail Impacted by Roots
Trail Maintenance and Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
Lighting
Repair Edge of Trail - Erosion
Add Mulch to Seasonal Trail
Restore Trail Accessibility
Repair/Replace Existing Lighting
Repair/replace Culverts
Extend New Lighting
Provide Formal Trail Connection
LEGEND
Enhance Existing Social Trails
Similar to Seasonal Trails
Seasonal Mulch Trail to Finish
Loop
Vegetation Clearing
Clear and Limb
South Woods Seasonal Trail Development
Clearing of Vegetation and
Debris Consistent with Current
Maintenance Practices
Accessibility Improvements per
FORTAG Trail Alignment. See
Figure 3.

MATCHLINE - SOUTH
Virgin Ave.

Canyon Del Rey Blvd.

English Ave.

Harcourt Ave. Branner Ave.

Montecito Ave.

Encina Grant Ave.

Ave.

Virgin Ave.

MATCHLINE - SOUTH
TRM-1
TRM-1
TRM-2
TRM-1
ADA-1
ADA-1
ADA-1
ADA-1
ADA-1
ADA-1
VEG-1
VEG-1
VEG-1
VEG-1
VEG-1
TRM-1
TRM-1
TRM-1
TRM-1
ADA-1
STR-1
ISR-1
ISR-2
ISR-3
ISR-4
ISR-5
RES
MIT
LGT-2
TRM-2
ADA-2
TRM-3
TRM-4
STR-2
VEG-1
VEG-2
TRM-5
LGT-1

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
Laguna Grande Lake
Existing Turf
Existing Turf
Parking
Existing Soccer Field
Parking
Parking
Existing
Turf

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROJECT BOUNDARY
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 289, Packet Page 318 32 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY FIGURE 11: PHASE ONE PLAN - SOUTH
Invasive Species Clearing
Clearing - Priority 1 (1-3 years)
Clearing - Priority 4/5
Priority 6 - No Action
Clearing - Priority 2 (1-5 years)
Restore Planting at Invasive
Clearing Areas
Clearing - Priority 3 (6-10 years)
Habitat Removal Mitigation Planting
Replace Trail Impacted by Roots
Trail Maintenance and Improvements
Accessibility Improvements
Lighting
Repair Edge of Trail - Erosion
Add Mulch to Seasonal Trail
Restore Trail Accessibility
Repair/Replace Existing Lighting
Repair/replace Culverts
Extend New Lighting
Provide Formal Trail Connection
LEGEND
Enhance Existing Social Trails
Similar to Seasonal Trails
Seasonal Mulch Trail to Finish
Loop
Vegetation Clearing
Clear and Limb
South Woods Seasonal Trail Development
Clearing of Vegetation and
Debris Consistent with Current
Maintenance Practices
Accessibility Improvements per
FORTAG Trail Alignment. See
Figure 3.

Fremont Blvd.

English Ave.

Sequoia Ave.

Kolb Ave.

Laguna Grande Ct.

Cassanova Ave.

Charles Ave.

Williams Ave.

Francis Ave.

Marin St.

Hilby Ave.

VEG-1
VEG-2
ISR-1
ISR-2
ISR-3
ISR-1
ISR-2
STR-2
STR-3
TRM-1
ADA-1
STR-1
ISR-1
ISR-2
ISR-3
ISR-4
ISR-5
RES
MIT
LGT-2
TRM-2
ADA-2
TRM-3
TRM-4
STR-2
VEG-1
VEG-2
TRM-5
LGT-1

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE
Laguna Grande Lake BBQ / Picnic Area

CITY OF MONTEREY

CITY OF SEASIDE

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROJECT BOUNDARY
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 290, Packet Page 319 cost estimates | 33
COST ESTIMATES 08
Continued Next Page
item description quantity unit cost item total subtotal ZONE 1 - LAGUNA GRANDE PARK-EXCLUDING SOUTH WOODLAND

INVASIVE SPECIES REMOVAL
Priority 1 (1-3 years):

High cost (Hand removal) 24,500 SF $0.35 $8,575
Medium cost (Mechanical removal) 6,500 SF $0.15 $975
Low cost 0 SF $0.07 $0
Tree removal 32 EA $500.00 $16,000 $25,550
Priority 2 (1-5 years):

High cost (Hand removal) 22,250 SF $0.35 $7,788
Medium cost (Mechanical removal) 6,200 SF $0.15 $930
Medium cost (Mechanical removal) in
defensible space
3,500 SF $0.07 $245
Low cost 0 SF $0.25 $0
Tree removal 2 EA $500.00 $1,000 $9,963
Priority 3 (6-10 years):

High cost (Hand removal) 2,100 SF $0.35 $735
Medium cost (Mechanical removal) 1,100 SF $0.15 $165
Low cost 0 SF $0.07 $0
Tree removal 0 EA $500.00 $0 $900
High cost (Hand removal) 93,750 SF $0.35 $32,813
Medium cost (Mechanical removal) 25,000 SF $0.15 $3,750 Low cost 9,600 SF $0.07 $672
Tree removal 0 EA $500.00 $0 $37,235
46,500 SF $0.00 $0 $0
Mitigation planting and irrigation 80,000 SF $5.00 $400,000 $400,000 Fire crew savings1 2 1 LS ($200,000.00) ($200,000.00) ($200,000)

LIMBING, PRUNING, CLEARING
Tree pruning and limbing 50 EA $500.00 $25,000 $25,000
TRAIL REPAIRS - ROOT IMPACTS - 250 LF
Demolition 2,500 SF $3.00 $7,500
Root pruning 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000
Fine grading 2,500 SF $0.25 $625
Asphalt paving and base 2,500 SF $8.00 $20,000 $36,125
TRAIL REPAIRS - ACCESSIBILITY - 325 LF
Demolition 3,250 SF $3.00 $9,750
Fine grading 3,250 SF $0.25 $813
Asphalt paving and base 3,250 SF $8.00 $26,000
Concrete paving 520 SF $16.00 $8,320 $44,883

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE

1.84 AC $13,000.00 $23,875 $23,875
Project Number: 21.019
Estimate By: DZ
Checked By: BM
Priority 4 (Himalayan Blackberry, English and
Cape Ivy - removal will have short and long term
impact on habitat)

LAGUNA GRANDE REGIONAL PARK COST ESTIMATE
Project: Laguna Grande Regional Park -
Maintenance Strategy
Client: Laguna Grande Regional Park JPA
Issuance: Strategy Draft
Date: February 28, 2022
Priority 5 (Himalayan Blackberry - No Action at this
time)
Annual maintenance for mitigation landscape
areas
BFS Landscape Architects 1 of 3
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 291, Packet Page 320 34 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY ZONE 2 - SOUTH WOODLAND

INVASIVE SPECIES REMOVAL
Priority 1 (1-3 years):

High cost (Hand removal) 5,800 SF $0.35 $2,030
Medium cost (Mechanical removal) 0 SF $0.15 $0
Low cost 0 SF $0.07 $0
Tree removal 29 EA $500.00 $14,500
Tree removal in defensible space 8 EA $500.00 $4,000 $20,530 Priority 2 (1-5 years):

High cost (Hand removal) in
defensible space
4,000 SF $0.35 $1,400
Medium cost (Mechanical removal) 0 SF $0.15 $0
Low cost 0 SF $0.07 $0
Tree removal 0 EA $500.00 $0 $1,400
Priority 3 (6-10 years):

High cost (Hand removal) in
defensible space
4,000 SF $0.35 $1,400
Medium cost (Mechanical removal) 0 SF $0.15 $0
Low cost 0 SF $0.07 $0
Tree removal 0 EA $500.00 $0 $1,400
High cost (Hand removal) 31,700 SF $0.35 $11,095
High cost (Hand removal) in
defensible space
4,000 SF $0.35 $1,400
Medium cost (Mechanical removal) 0 SF $0.15 $0
Low cost 0 SF $0.07 $0
Tree removal 0 EA $500.00 $0 $12,495
179,500 SF $0.00 $0 $0
35,500 SF $0.00 $0 $0
Mitigation planting and irrigation 35,000 SF $5.00 $175,000 $175,000 Fire crew savings1 2 1 LS ($98,250.00) ($98,250) ($98,250) Seasonal footbridge at ditch crossing 4 AL $6,500.00 $26,000 Clear and grub 24,400 SF $0.50 $12,200
Fine grading 24,400 SF $0.50 $12,200
Mulch-3" depth 226 CY $120.00 $27,120
Mitigation planting and irrigation 24,400 SF $5.00 $122,000 $199,520 Fire crew savings1 2 3 1 LS ($61,680.00) ($61,680) ($61,680) 8' SEASONAL TRAIL DEVELOPMENT - 3050 LF
Priority 4 (Himalayan Blackberry, English and
Cape Ivy - removal will have short and long term
impact on habitat)
Priority 5 (Himalayan Blackberry - No Action at this
time) in defensible space
Priority 5 (Himalayan Blackberry - No Action at this
time)
BFS Landscape Architects 2 of 3
Continued Next Page
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 292, Packet Page 321 cost estimates | 35

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE

1.36 AC $13,000.00 $17,727
Seasonal trail maintenance 1 AL $25,000.00 $25,000 $42,727 TOTAL $1,056,602
Potential Fire Crew Savings -$359,930
NOTES

1. Fire crews consist of 12-15 crew members and a fire captain. Cost $225 a day and bring their own equipment.

2. Assumed fire crews will clear and grub at $0.25 a SF and could plant at $3.00 a SF The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on BFS Landscape Architects' judgment at this level of document preparation and is offered only as reference data. BFS has no control over construction quantities, costs, and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variations may occur between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.

3. Assumed fire crews will clear and grub at $0.25 a SF and mulch at $90.00 a CY.

Annual maintenance for mitigation landscape
areas
BFS Landscape Architects 3 of 3
Continued Next Page
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 293, Packet Page 322 36 | LAGUNA GRANDE TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION PHASE 1
item description quantity unit cost item total subtotal

LIMBING, PRUNING, CLEARING
Tree pruning and limbing 50 EA $500.00 $25,000 $25,000

LIMBING, PRUNING, CLEARING AT ENCAMPMENTS
Tree pruning and limbing 50 EA $500.00 $25,000 $25,000
TRAIL REPAIRS - ROOT IMPACTS - 250 LF
Demolition 2,500 SF $3.00 $7,500
Root pruning 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000
Fine grading 2,500 SF $0.25 $625
Asphalt paving and base 2,500 SF $8.00 $20,000 $36,125
TRAIL REPAIRS - ACCESSIBILITY - 200 LF
Demolition 2,000 SF $3.00 $6,000
Fine grading 2,000 SF $0.25 $500
Asphalt paving and base 2,000 SF $8.00 $16,000
Concrete paving 520 SF $16.00 $8,320 $30,820
Seasonal footbridge at ditch crossing 1 AL $6,500.00 $6,500 Clear and grub 3,200 SF $0.50 $1,600
Fine grading 3,200 SF $0.50 $1,600
Mulch-3" depth 30 CY $120.00 $3,600
Mitigation planting and irrigation 3,200 SF $5.00 $16,000 $29,300 Fire crew savings1 2 3 1 LS ($8,100.00) ($8,100) ($8,100)

INVASIVE SPECIES REMOVAL - NON-SOUTH WOODS
3,600 SF $0.35 $1,260
3,000 SF $0.15 $450
600 SF $0.07 $42 $1,752

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE

0.07 AC $13,000.00 $955
Seasonal trail maintenance 1 AL $8,000.00 $8,000 $8,955 TOTAL $156,952
Potential Fire Crew Savings -$8,100
NOTES

1. Fire crews consist of 12-15 crew members and a fire captain. Cost $225 a day and bring their own equipment.

2. Assumed fire crews will clear and grub at $0.25 a SF and could plant at $3.00 a SF 8' SEASONAL TRAIL DEVELOPMENT - 400 LF
LAGUNA GRANDE REGIONAL PARK PHASE 1 COST ESTIMATE
Project: Laguna Grande Regional Park -
Maintenance Strategy
Client: Laguna Grande Regional Park JPA
Issuance: Strategy Draft
Date: February 28, 2022
Project Number: 21.019
Estimate By: DZ
Checked By: BM

3. Assumed fire crews will clear and grub at $0.25 a SF and mulch at $90.00 a CY.

High cost (Hand removal)
Medium cost (Mechanical removal)
Low cost
The above items, amounts, quantities, and related information are based on BFS Landscape Architects' judgment at this level of document preparation and is offered only as reference data. BFS has no control over construction quantities, costs, and related factors affecting costs, and advises the client that significant variations may occur between this estimate of probable construction costs and actual construction prices.

Annual maintenance for mitigation landscape
BFS Landscape Architects 1 of 1
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 294, Packet Page 323 cost estimates | 37
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 295, Packet Page 324 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 296, Packet Page 325

A P P E N D I X A

P L A N T S U R V E Y
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 297, Packet Page 326

MEMORANDUM
To: Elizabeth Matz, BFS Landscape Architects
From: Patrick Furtado
Date: July 2, 2021
Re: Laguna Grande Regional Park Vegetation Mapping and Focused Plant Survey Results
Vegetation Mapping
EMC Planning Group associate biologist Patrick Furtado, M.S. conducted geographic information system (GIS) mapping of Laguna Grande Regional Park on May 18, 2021. Plant communities and several other features including invasive plants, trails, and homeless camps were mapped using Environmental Systems Research Institute’s (ESRI) Field Maps mobile mapping application and a Trimble R1 sub-meter Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver.

Plant communities were classified and mapped generally according to the alliance level of the Manual of California Vegetation (Sawyer et al. 2009). Figure 1, Vegetation Map – North, and Figure 2, Vegetation Map – South, are attached to this memorandum. Electronic GIS data can be provided upon request.

Focused Plant Survey
EMC Planning Group associate biologist Patrick Furtado completed focused plant surveys for special-status plant species on May 24, 2021 and June 15, 2021 in accordance with current California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW 2009) and California Native Plant Society (CNPS 2001) rare plant survey protocols. According to the United States Drought Monitor, the project site is located in an area experiencing extreme drought conditions at the time of surveys (National Drought Mitigation Center 2021).

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 298, Packet Page 327 Ms. Matz
BFS Landscape Architects
July 2, 2021, Page 2

MEMORANDUM
Mr. Furtado also visited nearby special-status plant reference populations for seaside bird’s beak (Cordylanthus rigidus ssp. littoralis), Monterey spineflower (Chorizanthe pungens var. pungens), Monterey gilia (Gilia tenuiflora ssp. arenaria), Yadon’s rein orchid (Piperia yadonii), and sand-loving wallflower (Erysimum ammophilum) to determine that these plant species were identifiable at the time of the surveys. All of these species except for Yadon’s rein orchid were identifiable. Yadon’s rein orchid may not be germinating or flowering in normal numbers this season due to the current extreme drought conditions (NDMC 2021). However, habitat for Yadon’s rein orchid was not found on the Laguna Grande Park project site.

All suitable habitats for special-status plant species within the Laguna Grande Park survey area were systematically surveyed and plant species observed were recorded in field notes. Plant species were identified in the field or collected for subsequent identification using plant keys contained in The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California (Baldwin et. al 2012). Taxonomy follows the Jepson Flora Project (2021) for scientific and common names.

Special-status species are those listed as Endangered, Threatened, or Rare, or as Candidates for listing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or CDFW under the state and/or federal Endangered Species Acts. The special-status designation also includes CDFW Species of Special Concern and Fully Protected species, California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Rare Plant Rank 1B and 2B species, and other locally rare species that meet the criteria for listing as described in Section 15380 of CEQA Guidelines. Special-status species are generally rare, restricted in distribution, declining throughout their range, or have a critical, vulnerable stage in their life cycle that warrants monitoring.

A total of 112 plant taxa were identified within the park boundaries, including 47 native California taxa (42 percent) and 65 non-native taxa (58 percent). No special-status plant species were observed within the Laguna Grande Regional Park survey area. Appendix A, Plant Species Observed, presents the list of all plant species that were observed at the park during the focused plant surveys.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 299, Packet Page 328 Ms. Matz
BFS Landscape Architects
July 2, 2021, Page 3

MEMORANDUM
Focused plant survey results are generally considered valid for about five years. Please contact me with any questions. I look forward to further assisting you with this important project.

Sincerely,
Patrick Furtado, M.S.

Associate Biologist
Attachments: Figure 1, Vegetation Map – North
Figure 2, Vegetation Map – South
Appendix A, Plant List
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 300, Packet Page 329 Ms. Matz
BFS Landscape Architects
July 2, 2021, Page 4

MEMORANDUM
References
Baldwin, B. G., D. H. Goldman, et al. 2012. The Jepson manual: vascular plants of California, University of California Press.

Bossard, Carla C., et al. Invasive Plants of California’s Wildlands. University of California Press, 2000.

Calflora Database. 2021. Calflora: Information on California plants for education, research and conservation online database. Berkeley, California. https://www.calflora.org/ California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2021. Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS) online database. http://bios.dfg.ca.gov
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2021. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) online database. https://wildlife.ca.gov/data/cnddb
California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC). 2021. Cal-IPC Invasive Plant Inventory online database. https://www.cal-ipc.org/plants/inventory/
California Native Plant Society (CNPS), Rare Plant Program. 2021. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California online database. http://www.rareplants.cnps.org Jepson Flora Project. 2021. Jepson eFlora online database. https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/ Matthews, Mary Ann, and Michael Mitchell. 2015. The Plants of Monterey County: An Illustrated Field Key. Monterey Bay Chapter, California Native Plant Society.

National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC). 2021. United States Drought Monitor. https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/CurrentMap/StateDroughtMonitor.aspx?CA Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J.M. Evens. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation.

California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Endangered Species Program online database. Species list for Monterey County. Washington, D.C. http://www.fws.gov/endangered/
Yeager, Rod M., and Michael Mitchell. Monterey County Wildflowers: A Field Guide.

Monterey Bay Chapter, California Native Plant Society, 2016.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 301, Packet Page 330 !(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
Arroyo Willow
Monterey
cypress
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Tule
Tule
Tule
Tule
Tule
Tule
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Ruderal
Ruderal
French Broom
French
Broom
French Broom
Arroyo Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Common Reed
(Native)
Cattail
Cattail
Cattail
Tule
French Broom
Ruderal
Ruderal
Chinese Elm
Monterey
cypress
Acacia
Tule
Tule
Tule
Himalayan
blackberry
Iceplant
Eucalyptus
Giant Reed
(Invasive)
Alder
Acacia
Acacia
Acacia
Acacia
Monterey Cypress
Giant Reed
(Invasive)
Cottonwood
Privet
English Ivy
Acacia
Alder Acacia
Coast
Live Oak
Coast
Live Oak
Monterey
Cypress
Coast
Live Oak
Vinca
Coast
Live Oak
Himalayan
Himalayan Blackberry
Blackberry
English Ivy
Tule
Alder
Alder
Coast Redwood
Alder
Alder
Tule
Camp
Himalayan
Blackberry
English Ivy
Diseased
Redwood
English Ivy
Sycamore
Walnut
Plum
Iceplant
Coast
Live Oak
Monterey
Cypress
Iceplant
Alder
Camp
English Ivy
Giant Reed
(Invasive)
Poison
Hemlock
Cattail
Kikuyu Grass
Poison
Hemlock
English Ivy
Coast
Live Oak
0 250 feet
Laguna Grande Trail Maintenance Strategy IS/MND
Vegetation Map - North
Figure 1
Source: ESRI 2021, Monterey County GIS 2019
Priority Invasive Plant Removal and Native Plant Resoration Area Priority Invasive Plant Removal
and Native Plant Restoration Area
Priority Invasive Plant Removal
and Native Plant Restoration Area
Priority Invasive Plant Removal and Native Plant Resoration Area All areas identified as Ruderal are potential sites for native plant gardens, butterfly gardens, or native plant restoration areas.

Approximate Park Boundary
Secondary or Social Trail
Monterey cypress Ruderal
Arroyo Willow Acacia
Cattail
Common Reed (Native)
French Broom
Himalayan Blackberry
Bulrush/Tule Iceplant
Main Trail
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 302, Packet Page 331 !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Arroyo Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Arroyo
Willow
Himalayan blackberry
Ruderal
Ruderal
French Broom
Acacia
Acacia
Acacia
Tule
Tule
Himalayan
blackberry
Himalayan blackberry
Iceplant
Eucalyptus
Giant Reed
(Invasive)
Alder Giant Reed
(Invasive)
Cottonwood
Privet
English Ivy
Eucalyptus
English Ivy Himalayan
Blackberry
Alder
Acacia
Alder
Alder
Eucalyptus
English Ivy
Acacia
Camp
Camp
Alder
Camp
Camp
Pampas grass
Camp
Camp
Camp
Camp
Himalayan
Blackberry
Camp
Acacia
Alder Acacia
Coast
Live Oak
Coast
Live Oak
Monterey
Cypress
Coast Live Oak
Vinca
Coast
Live Oak
Himalayan
Blackberry
English Ivy
Coast
Live Oak
Monterey
Cypress
English Ivy
Coast
Live Oak
Coast
Live Oak
Coast
Live Oak
Camp
0 250 feet
Laguna Grande Trail Maintenance Strategy IS/MND
Vegetation Map - South
Figure 2
Source: ESRI 2021, Monterey County GIS 2019
Priority Invasive Plant Removal
and Native Plant Restoration Area
Priority Invasive Plant Removal
and Native Plant Restoration Area
All areas identified as Ruderal are potential sites for native plant gardens, butterfly gardens, or native plant restoration areas.

Approximate Park Boundary
Secondary or Social Trail
Monterey cypress Ruderal
Priority Invasive Plant Removal
and Native Plant Restoration Area
Arroyo Willow Acacia
Cattail
Common Reed (Native)
French Broom
Himalayan Blackberry
Tule Iceplant
Main Trail
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 303, Packet Page 332

APPENDIX A
PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED MAY 24 AND JUNE 15, 2021
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 304, Packet Page 333 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 305, Packet Page 334 Laguna Grande Regional Park Focused Plant Survey
EMC Planning Group Inc. 1
Appendix A: Plant Species Observed May 24 and June 15, 2021 Family Species Name Common Name Native/Non-Native Form
Aizoaceae Carpobrotus edulis Iceplant • invasive non-native Perennial herb Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron diversilobum Poison oak native Vine, Shrub Apiaceae Apium graveolens Celery non-native Annual, Biennial herb Apiaceae Conium maculatum Poison hemlock • invasive non-native Perennial herb Apiaceae Foeniculum vulgare Fennel • invasive non-native Perennial herb Apiaceae Oenanthe sarmentosa Water parsley native Perennial herb Apocynaceae Vinca major Vinca • invasive non-native Perennial herb Araceae Zantedeschia aethiopica Callalily • invasive non-native Perennial herb Araliaceae Hedera helix English ivy • invasive non-native Vine, Shrub Asteraceae Baccharis pilularis Coyote brush native Shrub Asteraceae Carduus pycnocephalus Italian thistle • invasive non-native Annual herb Asteraceae Cirsium vulgare Bullthistle • invasive non-native Perennial herb Asteraceae Cotula coronopifolia Brass buttons • invasive non-native Perennial herb Asteraceae Delairea odorata Cape ivy • invasive non-native Perennial herb Asteraceae Helminthotheca echioides Bristly ox-tongue • invasive non-native Annual, Perennial herb Asteraceae Hypochaeris glabra Smooth cats ear • invasive non-native Annual herb Asteraceae Hypochaeris radicata Hairy cats ear • invasive non-native Perennial herb Asteraceae Jaumea carnosa Marsh jaumea native Perennial herb Asteraceae Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce • invasive non-native Annual herb Asteraceae Matricaria discoidea Pineapple weed native Annual herb Asteraceae Pseudognaphalium luteoalbum Jersey cudweed non-native Annual herb Asteraceae Sonchus asper Spiny sowthistle • invasive non-native Annual herb Asteraceae Taraxacum officinale Red seeded dandelion • invasive non-native Perennial herb Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 306, Packet Page 335 Appendix A
2 EMC Planning Group Inc.

Family Species Name Common Name Native/Non-Native Form
Betulaceae Alnus rhombifolia White alder native Tree
Boraginaceae Heliotropium curassavicum var. oculatum Seaside heliotrope native Perennial herb Brassicaceae Brassica nigra Black mustard • invasive non-native Annual herb Brassicaceae Hirschfeldia incana Mustard • invasive non-native Perennial herb Brassicaceae Nasturtium officinale Watercress native Perennial herb (aquatic) Brassicaceae Raphanus sativus Jointed charlock • invasive non-native Annual, Biennial herb Caryophyllaceae Silene gallica Common catchfly non-native Annual herb Chenopodiaceae Atriplex prostrata Fat-hen non-native Annual herb Convolvulaceae Calystegia macrostegia Island morning glory native Perennial herb, Vine Cornaceae Cornus sericea American dogwood native Shrub
Cucurbitaceae Marah fabacea California man-root native Perennial herb, Vine Cupressaceae Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress native Tree Cupressaceae Sequoia sempervirens Coast redwood native Tree Cyperaceae Bolboschoenus robustus Sturdy bullrush native Perennial grasslike herb Cyperaceae Cyperus eragrostis Tall cyperus native Perennial grasslike herb Cyperaceae Schoenoplectus acutus var. occidentalis Tule native Perennial grasslike herb Cyperaceae Schoenoplectus californicus California bulrush native Perennial grasslike herb Cyperaceae Schoenoplectus pungens var. longispicatus Common threesquare native Perennial grasslike herb Cyperaceae Scirpus microcarpus Small fruited bulrush native Perennial grasslike herb Equisetaceae Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horsetail native Fern Fabaceae Acacia dealbata Silver wattle • invasive non-native Tree, Shrub Fabaceae Acacia longifolia Golden wattle non-native Tree Fabaceae Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood acacia • invasive non-native Tree Fabaceae Genista monspessulana French broom • invasive non-native Shrub Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 307, Packet Page 336 Laguna Grande Regional Park Focused Plant Survey
EMC Planning Group Inc. 3
Family Species Name Common Name Native/Non-Native Form
Fabaceae Lupinus arboreus Coastal bush lupine native Shrub Fabaceae Lupinus nanus Valley sky lupine native Annual herb Fabaceae Medicago polymorpha California burclover • invasive non-native Annual herb Fabaceae Melilotus albus White sweetclover • invasive non-native Annual, Biennial herb Fabaceae Melilotus indicus Annual yellow sweetclover non-native Annual herb Fabaceae Trifolium repens White clover non-native Perennial herb Fabaceae Vicia sativa Spring vetch non-native Annual herb, Vine Fagaceae Quercus agrifolia Coast live oak native Tree
Geraniaceae Erodium botrys Big heron bill non-native Annual herb Geraniaceae Geranium dissectum Wild geranium • invasive non-native Annual herb Geraniaceae Geranium rotundifolium Round leaved geranium non-native Annual herb Juglandaceae Juglans hindsii Northern california black walnut native Tree Juncaceae Juncus effusus ssp. pacificus Pacific rush native Perennial grasslike herb Juncaceae Juncus patens Rush native Perennial grasslike herb Malvaceae Malva pseudolavatera Cretan mallow non-native Shrub Malvaceae Malva sylvestris High mallow non-native Perennial herb Myrsinaceae Lysimachia arvensis Scarlet pimpernel non-native Annual herb Myrtaceae Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum • invasive non-native Tree Onagraceae Epilobium ciliatum Slender willow herb native Perennial herb Onagraceae Oenothera elata Evening primrose native Perennial herb Papaveraceae Eschscholzia californica California poppy native Annual, Perennial herb Plantaginaceae Plantago coronopus Cut leaf plantain • invasive non-native Annual herb Plantaginaceae Plantago lanceolata Ribwort • invasive non-native Perennial herb Plantaginaceae Plantago major Common plantain non-native Perennial herb Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 308, Packet Page 337 Appendix A
4 EMC Planning Group Inc.

Family Species Name Common Name Native/Non-Native Form
Platanaceae Platanus racemosa California sycamore native Tree Poaceae Agrostis stolonifera Redtop • invasive non-native Perennial grass Poaceae Arundo donax Giant reed • invasive non-native Perennial grass Poaceae Avena fatua Wildoats • invasive non-native Annual grass Poaceae Bromus diandrus Ripgut brome • invasive non-native Annual grass Poaceae Bromus sitchensis var. carinatus California brome native Perennial grass Poaceae Digitaria sanguinalis Crabgrass non-native Annual grass Poaceae Distichlis spicata Salt grass native Perennial grass Poaceae Ehrharta erecta Upright veldt grass • invasive non-native Perennial grass Poaceae Festuca myuros Rattail sixweeks grass • invasive non-native Annual grass Poaceae Festuca perennis Italian rye grass • invasive non-native Annual, Perennial grass Poaceae Holcus lanatus Common velvetgrass • invasive non-native Perennial grass Poaceae Hordeum murinum Foxtail barley • invasive non-native Annual grass Poaceae Pennisetum clandestinum Kikuyu grass • invasive non-native Perennial grass Poaceae Phragmites australis Common reed native Perennial grass Poaceae Poa annua Annual blue grass non-native Annual grass Polygonaceae Persicaria amphibia Water smartweed native Perennial herb (aquatic) Polygonaceae Polygonum aviculare Prostrate knotweed non-native Annual, Perennial herb Polygonaceae Rumex acetosella Sheep sorrel • invasive non-native Perennial herb Polygonaceae Rumex crispus Curly dock • invasive non-native Perennial herb Polygonaceae Rumex pulcher Fiddleleaf dock non-native Perennial herb Rhamnaceae Ceanothus thyrsiflorus Blueblossom native Tree, Shrub Rhamnaceae Frangula californica California coffeeberry native Shrub Rosaceae Potentilla anserina Silver weed cinquefoil native Perennial herb Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 309, Packet Page 338 Laguna Grande Regional Park Focused Plant Survey
EMC Planning Group Inc. 5
Family Species Name Common Name Native/Non-Native Form
Rosaceae Prunus cerasifera Cherry plum • invasive non-native Tree Rosaceae Prunus ilicifolia Holly leaf cherry native Tree, Shrub Rosaceae Prunus virginiana Chokecherry native Tree, Shrub Rosaceae Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry • invasive non-native Shrub Rosaceae Rubus ursinus California blackberry native Vine, Shrub Salicaceae Populus trichocarpa Black cottonwood native Tree Salicaceae Salix laevigata Polished willow native Tree
Salicaceae Salix lasiandra Pacific willow native Tree
Salicaceae Salix lasiolepis Arroyo willow native Tree, Shrub Sapindaceae Acer negundo Boxelder native Tree
Scrophulariaceae Myoporum laetum Ngaio tree • invasive non-native Tree, Shrub Scrophulariaceae Verbascum thapsus Woolly mullein • invasive non-native Perennial herb Tropaeolaceae Tropaeolum majus Garden nasturtium non-native Annual herb, Vine Typhaceae Typha latifolia Broadleaf cattail native Perennial herb (aquatic) Urticaceae Parietaria judaica Spreading pellitory non-native Perennial herb Urticaceae Urtica dioica Stinging nettle native Perennial herb Urticaceae Urtica urens Annual stinging nettle non-native Annual herb SOURCE: EMC Planning Group 2021
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 310, Packet Page 339

A P P E N D I X B

I N V A S I V E P L A N T

C O N T R O L
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 311, Packet Page 340 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 1 September 2021

LAGUNA GRANDE REGIONAL PARK

TRAIL MAINTENANCE STRATEGY
September 28, 2021

GUIDELINES FOR INVASIVE, NON-NATIVE PLANT REMOVAL/CONTROL

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Non-native plant species are species not present in California and/or the Monterey Bay prior to Russian, Spanish and/or European colonization. The Spanish discovery of Monterey Bay occurred in the early 1600’s, yet it wasn’t until 1770 that the first non-Native American settlement was established (Gordon, 1996). Available evidence indicates that the vast majority of non-native plants now established in California were introduced after this time (Cal-IPC, 2021). Settlers brought non-native plants accidentally in ship ballast and as contaminants of grain shipments, in livestock and livestock feed, as well as intentionally for food, fiber, medicine, and ornamental uses. Most non-native plants introduced to California in these early times first established at coastal sites near ports and around missions and other settlements. This is likely true for the Monterey Bay region. The majority of the first nonnative plants to establish were of European origin; however, later-arriving species have origins in central and south America, and more recently from Asia and Australia. Many of the arriving nonnative plant species found favorable growing conditions in coastal California and became successful in competing with native plant species for growing space, soil nutrients, and soil moisture. Of the estimated 1,800 non-native plant species established in California, only approximately 200 (11%) are recognized as serious threats to native ecosystems; yet these species have dramatically changed California’s ecological landscape (Cal-IPC, 2021). Species that exhibit aggressive growth patterns that lead to a reduction in native plant diversity and cover are considered to be invasive, non-native plant species.

An aggressive growth pattern of an invasive, non-native plant species can result in a corresponding reduction in the diversity and health of native flora and fauna. A decrease in native plant and animal diversity can lead to a weakening of native ecosystems, making the ecosystem more vulnerable to permanent damage due to stochastic events (i.e., unpredictable events that can affect population and community dynamics, such as disease infestation, wildfire, or unintentional human damage). In addition, as native insects and wildlife rely on native plants for shelter, food and reproduction, the spread of non-utilized non-native plant species can result in the disappearance or reduced numbers and vigor of native species. A study on the ecosystems of California found the impacts of invasive species on native species include genetic impacts (i.e., hybridizing with native species), local or species-level extinctions through disease and displacement, changes in community composition and native species diversity, and altered ecosystem processes such as nutrient cycling and disturbance regimes (Mooney and Zavaleta 2016). Additionally, some invasive non-native plants are toxic to wildlife and insects. Toxic plant materials weaken or kill aquatic life. Finally, the loss of the complex plant cover and plant root systems lead to decreases in soil moisture, increases in soil temperature and changes in soil chemical composition. Soil and moisture changes can lead to increases in erosion potential and decreases in water quality.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 312, Packet Page 341 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 2 September 2021 Numerous non-native plant species have been recorded in Laguna Grande Regional Park. Some of these are invasive with infestations having negative effects on the park’s upland and wetland ecosystems. A level of environmental damage has occurred within the Park from infestations of these invasive, non-native plant species. Measures to reduce damage from invasive, non-native plant species, to benefit the Park’s native ecosystems, are identified in this chapter.

2.0 METHODOLOGY
The extent of invasive, non-native plant species within Laguna Grande Regional Park was assessed through literature review, review of the Vegetation Mapping and Focused Plant Survey Results (EMC Planning Group, 2021), and field observations by Kathleen Lyons (plant ecologist) and George McMenamin (restoration specialist). Field surveys were conducted on July 30, August 10 and September 7, 2021 to field-check previously mapped data, identify additional locations of invasive, non-native plant species, evaluate the level of threat an infestation poses to native resources, and evaluate measures for removal and control of infestations. The distribution of the invasive, non-native plant species was depicted onto a base map and EMC Planning Group entered data entered into a Geographic Information System (GIS).

3.0 INVASIVE, NON-NATIVE PLANT SPECIES
Over twenty-five invasive, non-native plant species were identified to be of management concern within Laguna Grande Regional Park. Most of these species are listed by the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC), as invasive species. Two species are listed as noxious weeds by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA). Table 1 lists these species and their CalIPC invasive rating. Figures 1 and 2 show the distribution of each species within the regional park.

Plant species have varying patterns for growth and reproduction. These patterns are considered in evaluating their ability to invade native ecosystems as well as control measures. Plants that are annual/biennial species, such as a thistle, typically grows quickly and produce large amounts of seed that is often easily dispersed by wind or by animals. Seeds from annual species typically have relatively short lifespans (1-5 years). Some perennial plants, such as French broom, reproduce by seed; however, the seed can persist in the soil for long periods of time (30+ years).

Some perennial plants, such as Cape ivy, can reproduce from stem fragments. The growth habitat and primary reproductive method of the invasive, non-native plant species is presented in Table 1.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 313, Packet Page 342 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 3 September 2021 Figure 1. Invasive, Non-native Plant Species, North
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 314, Packet Page 343 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 4 September 2021 Figure 2. Invasive, Non-native Plant Species, South
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 315, Packet Page 344 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 5 September 2021 Table 1. Invasive, Non-native Plant Species of Management Concern, Laguna Grande Regional Park Common Name Scientific Name Cal-IPC
Ranking
Growth Habit Primary Reproduction
TREES
Acacia Acacia melanoxylon
Acacia dealbata
Acacia longifolia
Moderate Perennial, evergreen Seed, roots and stump
sprouts
Blue Gum Eucalyptus Eucalyptus globulus Limited Perennial, evergreen Seed, stump sprouts White Ash Fraxinus americana None Perennial, deciduous Seed, stump and root sprouts
Ngaio Tree (Myoporum) Myoporum laetum None Perennial, evergreen Seed Cherry Plum Prunus cerasifera None Perennial, deciduous Seed, stump sprouts Chinese Elm Ulmus parvifolia None Perennial, deciduous Seed, stump and root sprout

SHRUBS AND WOODY VINES
French Broom Genista monspessulana High Perennial Seed
Glossy Privet Ligustrum lucidum Limited Perennial Seed
Himalayan Blackberry Rubus armeniacus High Perennial Seed, root fragments, cane tips
Elm-leaf (thornless)
Blackberry
Rubus ulmifolius None Perennial Seed, root fragments,
cane tips
Pride of Madeira Echium candicans Limited Perennial Seed

NON-WOODY VINES, GRASSES, AND GROUNDCOVERS
Aloe Aloe arborescens None Perennial Vegetatively, seeds Giant Reed Arundo donax High Perennial Vegetatively
Short-stalked False
Bindweed
Calystegia silvatica None Perennial Seeds, roots
Italian Thistle Carduus pycnocephalus Moderate1 Annual Seed Ice Plant Carpobrotus edulis
Carpobrotus chilensis
High Perennial Roots, plant fragments,
seed
Bull Thistle Cirsium vulgare Moderate1 Biennial Seed
Poison Hemlock Conium maculatum Moderate Biennial Seed
Jubata Grass
Pampas Grass
Cortederia jubata
Cortederia selloana
High Perennial Seed
Cape Ivy Delairea odorata High Perennial Vegetatively
Panic Veldt Grass Ehrharta erecta Moderate Annual Seed
Fennel Foeniculum vulgare Moderate Perennial Seed root fragments English Ivy Hedera helix
Hedera spp. and
cultivars
High Perennial Seed, vegetatively
Japanese Honeysuckle Lonicera japonica None Perennial Seed, vegetatively Kikuyu Grass Pennisetum
clandestinum
Limited Perennial Seed, rhizome, stolen
fragments
Nasturtium Tropaeolum majus None Annual Seed, stem fragments Periwinkle Vinca major Moderate Vegetatively
Calla Lily Zantedeschia aethiopica Limited Perennial Seed, rhizome 1 – species has a pest rating of “C” by CDFA: “State endorsed holding action and eradication if plant found in a nursery; action to retard spread of plant outside nursery at discretion of County Agricultural Commissioner.” Table 2 identifies the inventory categories developed by Cal-IPC to reflect the level of a species negative ecological impact in California. These categories are high, moderate, or limited. Two additional categories are “Alert” and “Watch.” An Alert is listed on species with High or Moderate impacts that have limited distribution in California, but may have the potential to spread much further. Species on the “watch” list have been assessed as posing a high risk of becoming invasive in the future in California.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 316, Packet Page 345 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 6 September 2021 Table 2. Cal-IPC Ratings of Invasive Weeds
Ranking Meaning of Ranking
High These species have severe ecological impacts on physical processes, plant and animal communities, and vegetation structure. Their reproductive biology and other attributes are conducive to moderate to high rates of dispersal and establishment. Most are widely distributed ecologically.

Moderate These species have substantial and apparent—but generally not severe—ecological impacts on physical processes, plant and animal communities, and vegetation structure. Their reproductive biology and other attributes are conducive to moderate to high rates of dispersal, though establishment is generally dependent upon ecological disturbance. Ecological amplitude and distribution may range from limited to widespread.

Limited These species are invasive but their ecological impacts are minor on a statewide level or there was not enough information to justify a higher score. Their reproductive biology and other attributes result in low to moderate rates of invasiveness. Ecological amplitude and distribution are generally limited, but these species may be locally persistent and problematic.

Source: Cal-IPC, 2021
The plant species descriptions provided in the following sections are based on general plant life cycles and growth patterns in the central coast region. The information provided should be used as a general guideline and does not replace yearly monitoring. Some biennials may become annuals or short-lived perennials based on extreme conditions, such as drought or years of high rainfall. Additionally, the timing of plant growth and flowering may change under extreme parameters.

3.1 Trees
Most non-native tree species have several common invasive characteristics. Most outcompete many native plant species by blocking sunlight, having rapid growth, and dominating soil moisture and nutrient resources.

Silver wattle (Acacia dealbata), Sydney golden wattle (Acacia longifolia) and blackwood wattle (Acacia melanoxylon) are all non-native trees or shrubs. All three species are native to Australia, fast growing, fix nitrogen, and can re-sprout from cut stumps. They all produce prodigious amounts of seed and likely have leaves with allelopathic properties. The silver wattle usually reaches a height of 40-50 feet and can reproduce from both rhizomes and seed. Sydney golden wattle is usually a small tree or shrub that grows to a height of 20 to 25 feet and may form dense thickets. The blackwood wattle usually reaches heights of 40-50 feet. The blackwood wattle also develops root suckers and can form clonal populations. Both the silver and blackwood wattle may grow taller under some circumstances. All of these species are highly invasive due to their rapid growth, the allelopathic leave litter, their large, seed banks and their ability to spread by rhizome or roots. Once established, they outcompete the native plant species and alter the soil chemistry by fixing nitrogen. Additionally, they can create a significant fire hazard.

Blue gum eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) is a large non-native tree that can grow rapidly to heights of 200 feet or more. It is native to Australia. Blue gum trees have an extensive lateral root system and can re-sprout from cut stumps and roots. Blue gum trees shed bark, leaves and drop branches continuously. This species can flower from late fall through the following spring, with seed capsules forming 10 months to a year later. The blue gum eucalyptus reproduces from seed.

The species is a highly invasive tree due to its rapid growth, existing seed bank, ability to reExhibit A Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 317, Packet Page 346 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 7 September 2021 sprout, and the allelopathic properties of the thick layer of leaf and bark litter. Additionally, the leaf litter, bark litter and large number of down branches create a significant fire hazard.

White ash (Fraxinus americana) is a non-native, evergreen to semi-deciduous tree native to southeastern Canada and midwestern United States. They can reach heights of 60 feet. Ash trees have large roots and may have adventitious roots. The trees flower in the spring with windborne pollination and they produce large quantities of viable seed. Ash trees are toxic to ruminant animals and may cause dermatitis to humans. The non-native ash species should be considered moderately invasive in riparian corridors or moist soils due to their rapid growth, potential for root sprouts and large quantities of seed.

Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia) is a non-native, semi-deciduous tree that can reach heights of 50 feet. It is native to Asia and prefers full to moderate sun. The Chinese elm sheds bark and has large roots. It flowers in late summer and produces viable seed. The seed can be carried by the wind for long distances. Chinese elms are low to moderately invasive in central coastal California, at this time, However, it is highly invasive in North Carolina and has potential to become more invasive along the central coast, due to its windborne seed and tolerance for many environmental conditions.

Cherry plum (Prunus cerasifera) is a non-native, often shrubby, deciduous tree that is native to Europe. Cherry plum trees can re-sprout from cut stumps and roots. This tree flowers in the spring and the plum-like fruit is often transported and spread into new areas, by animals and humans. Although this tree rarely forms groves or dominates habitat, it should be considered moderately invasive in some habitats where there is disturbance, or reduced competition and adequate resources for seedlings to become established.

Ngaio tree (myoporum) (Myoporum laetum) is a non-native, evergreen tree or shrub that can reach a height of 30 feet. It is native to New Zealand. Ngaio trees have a deep taproot and are drought tolerant when mature. Plants may re-sprout when the stems are cut. Ngaio trees flowers in the spring and summer and produces fruit containing 2-6 seeds. They produce large quantities of fruit which is often transported by birds. If the fruit stays intact, the seeds can survive for several years. This plant has regional toxicity if eaten, particularly the leaves. The Ngaio tree is moderately invasive in disturbed areas with sufficient soil moisture. This species can form monocultured stands due to the leaf litter and high seed production.

3.2 Shrubs and Woody Vines
French broom (Genista monspessulana) is a non-native, leguminous, perennial shrub with an average life span of 12-15 years. It is native to the Mediterranean region of Europe. French broom is evergreen and may reach a height of 10+ feet. French broom usually flowers in spring and early summer. A mature plant can produce thousands of seed pods per year. Each pod contains 5- 8 seeds. The seed pods are dehiscent, bursting open in the summer, expelling seeds for a distance of up to 6 feet. French broom seed remains viable in and on the soil for decades. French broom seeds and flowers are toxic to humans and many domestic and native wildlife species. French broom is a highly invasive shrub that spreads rapidly. The prodigious quantities and long-term Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 318, Packet Page 347 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 8 September 2021 viability of the seeds often result in a rapid expansion of the infestation. In addition, French broom will re-sprout from cut stumps unless it is cut below the root crown. Over a period of 3-6 years French broom can create a dense, monocultured stand.

Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and elm-leaf (thornless) blackberry (Rubus ulmifolius) are long-lived, non-native shrubs/woody vines that develop a perennial root system.

These species grow in numerous forms and create dense thickets. Both species can assume a vine form and climb 20-30 feet into trees. Himalayan blackberry is native to Eurasia; elm-leaf (thornless) blackberry is native to Europe. Both species flower in the spring and usually produces fruit in the summer. Both of these blackberry species are highly invasive and spread quickly.

They produce large quantities of berries and the seeds are often spread by birds and other animals that eat the fruit. Both blackberries develop extensive root systems and can spread vegetatively (re-sprout) from root fragments and re-rooting from cane tips.

Glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum) is a non-native, evergreen tree or shrub that is native to Asia.

This tree can reach heights of 40 feet and often has multiple stems. Glossy privet can re-sprout from cut stumps or roots. Glossy privet flowers in the late spring to summer. This species produces large quantities of berries that are mostly dispersed by birds. Glossy privet reproduces by both seed and roots. They may be invasive in woodlands or forest habitats where root sprouts and seed can form dense stands over time.

Pride of Madeira (Echium candicans) is a large, long lived, perennial shrub that is native to the island of Madeira, north of the Canary Islands. Pride of Madeira has numerous branches, woody roots and can reach heights of 8 feet. Pride of Madeira is a common landscape ornamental that has escaped cultivation in coastal regions. This species requires full sun and may bloom from April thru July, producing large quantities of viable seed. All parts of the plant are considered poisonous to ingest and can skin contact can cause dermatitis. Due to its long-life span and large quantities of seed, Pride of Madeira is moderately invasive along the central coast.

3.3 Non-woody Vines, Grasses and Groundcovers
Aloe (Aloe arborescens) is an evergreen, perennial succulent, native to southern Africa. Often called torch aloe, it is a large, densely growing succulent shrub that can reach 9 feet in height and spread. The stems support numerous narrow, recurved, soft-toothed margined leaves that are dull green, yellow-green to sometimes blue-green depending on the location and amount of sunlight received. Coral-red flowers bloom in late fall and early winter. Aloe spreads vegetatively, from a branch or stem and can also reproduce by seed. Due to Aloe’s ability to spread both vegetatively and by seed, this species is considered somewhat invasive.

Giant reed (Arundo donax) is a non-native, long-lived, perennial grass that can grow to heights of 10+ feet. It is native to the Mediterranean area and tropical Asia. Giant reed has an extremely thick, aggressive, rhizomatous root system that can survive periodic flooding. Although it can flower year-round in some areas, seedlings are not encountered in California. It reproduces almost exclusively from rhizomes and root fragments which are often spread during flooding or high-water levels. In addition, Giant reed is highly flammable and can increase the risk of fire.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 319, Packet Page 348 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 9 September 2021 Giant reed is invasive, particularly in riparian corridors where it forms dense, impenetrable stands completely eliminating native plant species and greatly reducing habitat values.

Short-stalked false bindweed (Calystegia sylvatica) is a non-native, aggressive, perennial vine with an extensive root system. It is native to Europe. The vines are extremely aggressive climbers and grow rapidly. They can grow high into trees and can smother small trees and shrubs. The vines die back each year to the roots. Each flower produces a capsule with 2-4 seeds. Shortstalked false bindweed spreads both vegetatively and by seed. Once established, this bindweed can be difficult to eradicate due to the extensive root system and seed bank.

Bull thistle (Cirsium vulgare) is usually a biennial, from Eurasia and Italian thistle (Carduus pycnocephalus) is usually an annual, both native to the Mediterranean area. Bull thistle mostly flowers in late spring through the summer of the second year, with seed viability ranging from 3 to 5 years. Italian thistle usually flowers from mid-April through May and seed viability ranges from 4-8 years. Italian thistle produces 2 types of seed; one seed type usually falls near the plant and the other seed type is carried by the wind. Both species of thistle may continue to produce flowers until soil moisture becomes too low. Both of these thistles reproduce only by seed. Bull thistle represents a greatest threat in areas with soil moisture continuing later into the summer and the plant can re-sprout from cut roots, if conditions are right. Bull thistle may continue to produce some flower heads well into the fall under good conditions. Italian thistle prefers ground with reduced late spring moisture.

Ice plant (Carpobrotus edulis/Carpobrotus chilensis - may include hybrids) is a non-native, ground creeping, succulent, perennial shrub. It is native to South Africa. Trailing stems can reach lengths of 10+ feet and root at the nodes. Ice plant can form large, extremely dense mats of clonal plants. It is drought tolerant and often grows year around. On the central coast, ice plant flowers for most of the year and may flower year around. It produces numerous seeds with seed viability of 2 years. However, it is thought that ice plant mainly produces seedings only in disturbed soils, due to herbivory. Once introduced into an area, ice plant can be highly invasive, in full sun.

Additionally, it creates high levels of organic matter that can lead to invasions by additional nonnative plant species. In this area, ice plant appears to spread mainly by root or plant fragments.

Poison hemlock (Conium maculatum) is a non-native, biennial, invasive plant that can grow to 10+ feet in height. It is native to Europe. It does not require much light and can grow in almost full shade. Poison hemlock can grow in most habitats as long as there is sufficient soil moisture.

A large plant can produce up to several thousand flowers and seeds. Poison hemlock usually flowers April through July, but can continue to flower through the summer. Damaged stems may flower into the following spring. Seed viability is thought to be 3-4 years. Poison hemlock is extremely toxic to human and animals when eaten. It can cause contact dermatitis in some humans. It is not uncommon for animals to ingest Poison hemlock in early spring or when desirable vegetation becomes scarce, in the late summer and fall. Poison hemlock is highly invasive, particularly in areas with some sunlight, and good soil moisture, although it can be invasive in most types of habitats. It does not spread vegetatively, but can re-sprout multiple times from its large taproot if the stem is cut or broken.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 320, Packet Page 349 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 10 September 2021 Pampas grass and Jubata grass (Cortederia selloana and C. jubata) are both non-native, perennial, densely tufted, grasses with long basal leaves and feathery inflorescence plumes. Both species are native to the Andes Mountains and several other sections of South America. The basal leaves and floral plumes can reach heights of 8-10 feet. The rhizomes and roots form a dense clump. Old pampas grass plants can have roots 10 feet deep and rhizomes 20 feet wide. Jubata grass tussocks are usually smaller than those of pampas grass. Although both species can produce large quantities of seed, pampas grass requires both male and female plants, in range, to create seed. All jubata grasses are female and produce viable seed. Each seed plume can have up to 100,000 seeds that are viable soon after emerging from the grass sheath. However, seed viability is less than 1 year and so a persisting seedbank does not occur. Pampas grass seedlings can survive a greater number of environmental conditions than jubata grass. In areas with disturbed soil, bare ground or low levels of competition from grasses or sedges, these two species can be highly invasive and greatly limit the establishment of native plant species.

Cape ivy (Delairea odorata) is a non-native, perennial vine that is usually evergreen, but can become deciduous under drought or extreme heat conditions. It is native to South Africa. Vines can form dense patches and smother all other vegetation. Additionally, the vines can grow 60+ feet in trees. Once established, Cape ivy vines and rhizomes can have growth rates of more than 20 feet in all directions per year. In California, Cape ivy flowers in mid to late winter and early spring. Although most Cape ivy seed is not viable in California, it is viable in some other countries and has proven viable under lab conditions. Cape ivy is mildly toxic to wildlife and can become toxic to fish and aquatic wildlife, if sufficient contact with water and dissolved plant matter occurs. Cape ivy is extremely invasive in riparian or shaded habitat. Although it does not usually produce viable seed in California, it has an extremely high growth rate and spreads vegetatively. The vines, stolons, and rhizomes are easily fragmented; a fragment as small as a half inch, with a node, can develop roots and re-sprout. As Cape ivy has a high carbohydrate and water content, even if left to dry for 2 or 3 months or more, a fragment can re-sprout when it rains or contacts moisture.

Panic veldt grass (Ehrharta erecta) is a perennial non-native grass. It is native to South Africa.

The roots usually form a shallow clump although they can grow deeper in sandy soil. Panic veldt grass can grow in conditions from full sun to almost full shade. This species can create flowers and prodigious seed year-round. On the Central coast, seeds can germinate any time of the year in areas with sufficient moisture or fog. Due to the fact that this grass grows well in almost full shade, produces ample seed and germinates year-round, it represents a serious threat to riparian, wooded or other partially shaded areas, where it can outcompete native understory plants.

Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) is a non-native, perennial invasive plant that can grow to 10+ feet in height. Fennel is native to Europe. It seems to grow best in areas of soil disturbance and may inhibit the growth of native plants, possibly due to allelopathic properties. The cultivar forms used for human consumption are usually not invasive. A single plant may produce multiple stems and 1000s of flowers and seeds. It usually flowers from late spring through the end of summer.

Fennel mostly reproduces by seed, but under good conditions can spread from root fragments.

Fennel is invasive in some habitats and is particularly invasive in areas with soil disturbance.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 321, Packet Page 350 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 11 September 2021 Once it develops a dense stand it will exclude native plant species due to it competitive seed bank and possibly allelopathic properties.

English ivy (Hedera helix, H. spp. and cultivars) is a general term used for a group of species.

There are over 12 Hedera species and hundreds of cultivars. They are morphologically similar and often require chromosome testing to identify accurately. Most plants in this area are likely one of three species with very similar morphological features and reproductive patterns. These species are native to Europe and often hybridize. English ivy is a non-native, perennial woody plant with 2 growth forms. When young it assumes a vine form that can grow upward to 100+ feet. This allows it to grow high into trees and form dense, monocultural coverage on the ground that eliminates almost all other vegetation. When it reaches the mature reproductive form, it is often erect and has tree or shrub-like stems. It mostly forms flowers in the fall and berries in the spring on vertical surfaces. Each plant can produce 1000s of seeds. English ivy is mildly toxic to wildlife and has been called a green desert. English ivy is highly invasive and spreads both vegetatively and by seed. Birds can spread the seed large distances. English ivy can grow over and smother almost all other vegetation. Additionally, it will grow up in trees and damage them from the weight, dense coverage and wind breakage.

Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) is a perennial climbing and ground cover vine. It is an evergreen and is a native to eastern Asia. The vines grow rapidly and can reach lengths of 30 feet. This honeysuckle flowers in late spring throughout the summer. Japanese honeysuckle is mildly toxic to humans, but does have some edible uses. Japanese honeysuckle can be highly invasive. Japanese honeysuckle grows rapidly and can smother or girdle small trees and shrubs with its vines. As ground cover it can outcompete native plant species. It spreads by both seed and rhizomatous stems which can root at each node.

Kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) is a non-native perennial grass that is native to tropical portions of Africa. It has prostate stems with a complex system of tough, branching rhizomes and stolons, mostly in the top 4-6 inches of soil. Kikuyu grass flowers from April to October and seed may be long-lived in some habitats. This grass can spread by both seed and vegetatively by rhizome or stolon fragments. When established, Kikuyu grass can form dense mat-like patches or grass areas that limit the growth of native plant species.

Garden nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus) is a non-native, annual or perennial, invasive garden escape. It is native to Central and South America. It can grow in multiple habitats, and often becomes invasive in riparian habitat. It has long climbing stems or vines that grow rapidly.

Garden nasturtium may form a dense groundcover and cover small shrubs or trees. Garden nasturtium flowers from late spring through the summer and produces ample seed. This species reproduces from the seed and vegetatively from stem fragments. Garden nasturtium is moderately invasive, particularly in riparian habitats with ample sun and well-draining soils. It may densely cover the ground and inhibit the growth of native plants. Once established Garden nasturtium can be difficult to control with its large seed bank.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 322, Packet Page 351 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 12 September 2021 Periwinkle (Vinca major) is a non-native, perennial, evergreen, invasive plant that is native to Europe. Periwinkle usually flowers from April to August. However, this species stems and flowers are almost always sterile, so spread from seed is uncommon. Trailing stems have been observed as long as 6+ feet and can re-root at each node. Periwinkle spreads almost exclusively from trailing stems and stem fragments. Periwinkle is highly toxic and most species will not usually eat it, including goats.

Periwinkle is highly invasive in shaded habitats once it is introduced. It creates a dense, monocultured ground cover that prevents native seedlings or the growth of native species.

Calla lily (Zantedeschia aethiopica) is a non-native, perennial, monocot that is native to South Africa. It is usually deciduous in the central coast, due to the long dry season. It can grow in full shade, but usually does not bloom without some sunlight. Calla lily usually flowers in the late spring to early summer. Each seed pod can contain up to 50 seeds. All parts of a Calla lily are toxic to humans and wildlife. Calla lily is moderately invasive in riparian or partially shaded habitats with well-draining soils. However, it usually does not flower in full shade. Calla lily spreads by seed and vegetatively by rhizomes. Additionally, each plant can create large numbers of specialized buds along the rhizome the result in new stems and flowers.

4.0 PRIORITY AND TREATMENT
The management of invasive, non-native plants refers to the removal/control of species that have been considered be a significant threat to the habitat value of the park’s riparian woodland and/or wetlands. To guide management actions and allocation of resources, priorities for species/occurrence removal were developed. This plan identifies six priority levels based on a species infestation, its ability to spread into habitat areas, and available removal/treatment actions. In addition, priority levels identify where removal actions may result in significant short or longer-term impacts to native riparian and/or wetland resources. Table 3 outlines the six priority levels.

Table 3. Priority Levels for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species Removal and Control

CODE PRIORITY RATIONALE
1 Highest Isolated patches of highly invasive species that significantly degrade habitats.

The goal is eradication in Years 1-3
2 High Localized occurrences suitable for complete control/eradication in Years 1-5 3 Moderate Isolated patches unlikely to spread significantly in next 5 years. If resources are not initially available treat in Years 6-10
4 Low Occurrences confined by trails or other barriers. Occurrences are intermixed with native species and removal/control would have significant short and/or long-term impacts on native woodland/wetland habitat.
5 Lowest Dense occurrences within inaccessible wooded terrain; heavy equipment and/or labor costs would be high for initial removal and long-term control; significant short and/or long-term impacts to native woodland habitat. 6 No Action Occurrence does not pose a significant impact to native biotic resources or is not likely to pose a significant decline in native habitat values over time.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 323, Packet Page 352 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 13 September 2021

4.1 Removal/Control Treatments
Invasive, non-native plant species within the project area can be controlled through use of heavy equipment, hand removal/cutting, mechanical weed whipping and other tool work, and herbicide application. The most effective control techniques must take into account a species growth cycle, its flowering period, seed production/release periods, and its occurrence or level of infestation within the project area. Table 4 identifies techniques and general guidelines for invasive plant control.

General Guidelines and Specifications. The techniques to control specific invasive, non-native plants are numerous. The various techniques and methods have been tailored specifically for the plant species, conditions and locations within the park and are listed in Table 4. Figures 3 and 4 display the priority level and recommended treatment method(s) for each invasive, non-native plant occurrence. Proper training of field personnel is recommended prior to all field work, such that the method and technique is correlated to the biology of the species and the surrounding environmental conditions. Additionally, as natural environments are subject to constant dynamic processes, adjustments to methods or techniques may be required.

Field Training. Although supervision as to timing, technique and general location for invasive plant management can be provided for personnel performing invasive plant fieldwork, the personnel performing the work will need to be capable of operating independently. Untrained personnel will cause negative impacts on plant management results. Therefore, a certain level of field training is required for success. Training should include, but not be limited to, the follow skills and abilities:
▪ The ability to identify the key invasive plant species likely to be encountered within the work area. This could be achieved by disseminating a booklet of major invasive plants and field training sessions.
▪ The ability to identify the key native plants species likely to be encountered within the work area. This could be achieved by disseminating information on native plants in the project area and field training sessions.
▪ Although field personnel often have a high degree of skill with various types of equipment, details of proper techniques and timing should be provided to achieve maximum efficiency and success.
▪ Instructions should be provided so if field personnel encounter plants, animals or situations outside of their scope of training, they will know the proper course of action to take when these situations occur. General guidance should be provided to workers to limit harm to sensitive or protected habitats and species (such as dusky-footed woodrat dens, bird nests), including guidelines to employ that would limit the disruption of work. ▪ Use adaptive management strategies. Field personnel may have useful and efficient ideas and methods for doing a given task. Field supervisors should be encouraged to consider new ideas and potential improvements based on monitoring the effectiveness and effects of actions implemented on both the targeted species and the habitat, short and long-term.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 324, Packet Page 353 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 14 September 2021 Figure 3. Treatment of Invasive, Non-native Plant Species, North Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 325, Packet Page 354 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 15 September 2021 Figure 4. Treatment of Invasive, Non-native Plant Species, South Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 326, Packet Page 355 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 16 September 2021 Table 4. Techniques for Removal of Invasive, Non-native Plant Species, Laguna Grande Regional Park Code Technique Possible Applications Treatment Notes
A Mechanical Equipment
(Includes all nonhandheld mechanized
equipment, such as
mowers, backhoes,
chippers, mulchers,
brush cutters, other
heavy equipment)
▪ Ice plant, Jubata grass
▪ Himalayan blackberry, English ivy in areas away from
water and trees- (leave buffer zones around each of
these)
▪ Maintenance and mowing of pathways, yet with care to
avoid spreading periwinkle, Kikuyu grass and panic veldt grass
▪ May be used for mass clearing of areas containing
invasive plant species with no desirable native plant
species
▪ Mowers may be used along pathways dominated by
invasive non-native plant species containing limited
specific native plants that will survive the treatment
▪ Should be avoided in areas of potential erosion or
sedimentation issues
▪ Use should be limited during bird nesting season
B Hand Removal
(includes all nonmotorized, battery or
electric powered)
individual hand
removal work, such as
shovels, pick-axes,
hoes, pulaskis, pruners
and loppers)
▪ All species. excluding trees and shrubs with trunk
diameters greater than 1”
▪ Requires removal of plant and roots for poison
hemlock, fennel, bull thistle, periwinkle, nasturtium,
panic veldt grass, Italian thistle, ice plant, Pride of Madeira, aloe, and calla lily
▪ Useful for removal of above-ground stems of short -
stalked false bindweed and Japanese honeysuckle, yet
these species may require a specific cut and paint
method to kill the underground growth and roots (see
E, below)
▪ Hand pull – maximize root removal, disposal options
vary with species
▪ Hand pull with hand tools; tools used mostly to
loosen soil around roots
▪ Surface cut of weeds (timing is critical, suitable for annual, shallow root species).
▪ Shovel cut to sever root (depth and timing are
critical)
▪ Full dig (mostly biennial and a few perennial
species)
C Herbicide Spot Spray
or Cut and Spray
(with non-ionic
surfactant)
▪ Jubata grass (cut and spray)
▪ Giant reed re sprouts (spot spray)
▪ Periwinkle, Kikuyu grass & calla lily (spot spray on a limited basis)
▪ See suggested guidelines and restrictions section
▪ Spot spray - should be based on herbicide
restrictions and guidelines to limit the chemicals,
quantities and concentrations used.
▪ Some targeted partial plant spray (terminal growth
area only) after initial cutting
D Mechanized Hand
Tools
(includes Individual
methods utilizing gas,
electric or battery
▪ Italian thistle (Needs to be specifically timed; hand removal is the preferred method)
▪ All trees (chainsaws followed by cut and paint
herbicide; See E below)
▪ Blackberries and English ivy (Hedge trimmers and
chainsaws to cut back growth)
▪ May requires specific techniques.
▪ No metal blades during dry season
▪ Timing is often critical for control and seed bank
depletion
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 327, Packet Page 356 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 17 September 2021 Table 4. Techniques for Removal of Invasive, Non-native Plant Species, Laguna Grande Regional Park Code Technique Possible Applications Treatment Notes
powered equipment,
such as chainsaws,
hedge trimmers,
augers, hammer drills,
brush cutters, weed
whips)
▪ Hedge trimmers and chainsaws for creating access to
areas for removal of other invasive species, such as
English ivy, Cape ivy, blackberries and nasturtium, yet care should be used to limit damage to desirable native plant species
▪ English ivy, Cape ivy and blackberries (large masses) E Cut and Paint
Herbicide
▪ This method is limited to perennial, woody plant
species.
▪ All tree and shrub species where the trunk is greater than 1” in diameter
▪ Short-stalked false bindweed and Japanese honeysuckle may require a specific cut and paint method to kill the underground growth and roots
▪ Cut stem and paint herbicide to cut
▪ Use on woody species capable of stump re-sprouts,
other vegetative growth or having rhizomatous
stems
▪ Requires different concentrations and usually no
surfactant
▪ Use 1” brush or small dabber
▪ Apply to cambium layer only, except for small
diameter stems or Hedera helix
▪ Apply first treatment within 1 minute of cut
▪ A second treatment may be applied within 2
minutes of first application
F Removal from Tree
Trunks
▪ Intended to remove specific invasive plant species
from the canopy of trees and shrubs.
▪ Mostly hand work for English ivy, Cape ivy and invasive blackberry species
▪ Chainsaws may be used to cut large-diameter English
ivy vines
▪ Hand pull and cut with hand tools – maximize stem
removal from lower tree trunk; allow canopy
material to die on site.

Note: Eradication of Cape ivy, English ivy and Himalayan blackberry may require many or all of the treatment methods in Table 4 to be successful. As these three species are often intertwined with native plants and found in riparian woodlands to be retained, efforts at eradication could result in short and moderate-term environmental damage to these woodlands. Additionally, eradicating these three species would require a long-term substantial commitment of time and resources. Therefore, for the purpose of this section, efforts for these species have been limited to control. If eradication of these species is desired, a species-specific long-term plan should be created.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 328, Packet Page 357 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 18 September 2021 Herbicide Guidelines and Restrictions. It is suggested that herbicide and associated surfactants be utilized only when conditions and/or resources practically limit other options. Additionally, efforts should be made to limit the quantities of herbicide used, the number of applications of herbicide and to elimination the use of surfactants where possible. Some level of experimentation, within allowable agency and biological restrictions, during the first session of invasive plant control, may provide information that will assist in achieving these goals. As conditions in a particular area may allow approved, appropriate changes from standard application practices or specialized methods, factors to be considered include, but are not limited to:
▪ Proximity to listed or protected species, or associated habitat ▪ Proximity to water or seasonal flows
▪ Method and timing of application to maximize effectiveness ▪ Type and concentration of herbicide
▪ Type and need for surfactant
▪ Potential to reduce the number of applications
▪ Plant species to be treated
▪ The density of focused invasive plant species
▪ The density and proximity of desirable plant species
▪ Timing of application to avoid conflicts with governmental environmental restrictions or biological imperatives.

Input from a Certified Pesticide Advisor may be required prior to herbicide use. Any herbicide applications should follow product label requirements, at a minimum. All herbicide use must follow legal and biological requirements and restrictions for application, cleanup and disposal.

These following considerations may exceed the product label requirements. Additional considerations could include:
▪ Herbicides potentially allowed (subject to approval and conditions). Possible herbicides that could be utilized include Milestone©, Rodeo©, Aquamaster©, Roundup Custom for Aquatic Habitats©, and Garlon 3.
▪ Surfactant allowed (subject to conditions, but recommend non-ionic only) ▪ Appropriate dye should be added to herbicide to identify placement. ▪ If herbicide work is to be done by non-county personnel, herbicide should be mixed on site, at a designated location from unopened containers. ▪ No herbicide should be used near on in running or standing water. ▪ No herbicide should be used within 48 hours after a rain event. ▪ Herbicide applications should not take place within 24 hours of a forecasted 20%+ chance of precipitation.
▪ No herbicide shall be used in proximity to listed species established by the appropriate agencies.
▪ No herbicide shall be used in proximity to nesting birds. ▪ No herbicide shall be used in proximity to bee colonies or like pollinators. ▪ Density or plant coverage protocols should be established for the types of herbicide application, when appropriate.
▪ Removable barriers shall be placed prior to area herbicide spraying (ex; stake and screen erosion fencing), when appropriate.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 329, Packet Page 358 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 19 September 2021

4.2 Precautions to Protect Sensitive Biotic Resources
Implementation of some invasive, non-native plant management activities has the potential to harm native plant and animal species, if such resources are present in the work area. For example, ground nesting birds can be harmed if they have nests within areas subject to vegetation removal during the bird nesting season. Dens of dusky-footed woodrat can be harmed if weed control activities inadvertently alter these dens. Measures are described in this section on actions to be implemented to avoid impacts to non-target plants and animals. In addition, work during the rainy season should be avoided, as there can be inadvertent impacts on downstream waters if sediment and soils are dislodged. If work is proposed between October 15 and April 15, work should be conducted away from the active creek channel and not in areas of standing water. If bare ground is created, consider placing erosion control features, such as straw wattles, around the perimeter of the treated area. Additional erosion control measures may be warranted. Work along the creek and pond edge should be done in a manner that avoids impacts to water quality.

Worker access in the creek bed and along the pond edge should be minimized.

Pre-Construction Bird Nest Survey and Woodrat House Avoidance. When invasive plant removal work is to occur within the bird-breeding season (i.e., typically March 1 through August 31) measures are needed to ensure work does not affect nesting birds, as all migratory bird nests are protected under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

Prior to vegetation removal the work area should be walked and inspected to determine presence/absence of nesting migratory birds. This survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist or by trained Park personnel. Meandering walking surveys should be conducted through the work area up to 7 days prior to work. If birds are found nesting within or immediately adjacent to the proposed work area, reschedule work until young have fledged, as determined by a qualified biologist, or the biologist shall establish an appropriate sized buffer zone around the nest(s) where no work shall take place until all young have fledged.

The work area should be walked to identify any wood rat houses. All stick houses are to be retained, with a minimum 10-foot buffer established around each house. Each house should be flagged and workers notified as to the location of each den.

4.3 Implementation Schedule and Adaptive Management
The removal of invasive, non-native plant species control should be timed to coincide with specific weather and plant growth conditions. As much as is possible, let the biology guide the timing of the treatment. Most invasive weed infestations can be effectively controlled when treatments are implemented prior to plant flowering, which reduces seed formation. Some biennial and perennial species are best treated after flowering, when plant nutrients are being expended and treatment actions can stress the plant, reduce its vigor, and inhibit its ability to reproduce. Other species may be best treated when they are focusing on drawing nutrients into the roots or stems for storage (i.e., English ivy, Himalayan blackberry). Table 5 displays the typical flowering period for each species.

Table 6 presents a generalized schedule of when plant species flower so as to schedule invasive weed control and maintenance. This schedule should only be used as a guide, as plant growth, including timing of flowering and seed set, are greatly influenced by rainfall and temperature Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 330, Packet Page 359 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 20 September 2021 patterns. Also, various techniques may require changing patterns to maximize effects.

Management actions should be updated and refined in response to weather patterns, plant responses, and as new information on weed control/treatment is gathered. All management actions should be monitored as to their effectiveness.

Tables 4, 5, and 6, used together, provide guidelines for determining the optimum timing for invasive weed control.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 331, Packet Page 360 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 21 September 2021 Table 5. Typical Flowering Period of Invasive, Non-native Plant Species, Laguna Grande Regional Park Common Name Scientific Name Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TREES
Acacia Acacia melanoxylon; A.
dealbata; A. longifolia
Blue Gum Eucalyptus Eucalyptus globulus
White Ash Fraxinus americana
Ngaio Tree (Myoporum) Myoporum laetum
Cherry Plum Prunus cerasifera
Chinese Elm Ulmus parvifolia

SHRUBS AND WOODY VINES
French Broom Genista monspessulana
Glossy Privet Ligustrum sp.

Himalaya Blackberry Rubus ameniacus
Elm-leaf (thornless) Blackberry Rubus ameniacus
Pride of Madeira Echium candicans

NON-WOODY VINES, GRASSES, AND GROUNDCOVERS
Aloe Aloe arborescens
Giant Reed Arundo donax
Short-stalked False Bindweed Calystegia silvatica
Italian Thistle Carduus pycnocephalus
Ice Plant Carpobrotus edulis; C.
chilensis
Bull Thistle Cirsium vulgare
Poison Hemlock Conium maculatum
Jubata Grass
Pampas Grass
Cortederia jubata; C. selloana
Cape Ivy Delairea odorata
Panic Veldt) Grass Erharta erecta
Fennel Foeniculum vulgare
English ivy Hedera helix; H. spp.

Japanese Honeysuckle Lonicera japonica
Kikuyu Grass Pennisetum clandestinum
Nasturtium Tropaeolum majus
Periwinkle Vinca major
Calla Lily Zantedeschia aethiopica
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 332, Packet Page 361 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 22 September 2021 Table 6. Invasive, Non-native Plant Treatment, Suggested Implementation Schedule, Years 1-10 Winter Spring Summer Fall
Task Jan Feb Mar Apr1 May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Yearly Tasks
Develop work plan plan for year, including procurment of specilized personnel, equipment, and/or services.

Conduct field inspection to monitor plant growth and progress of flowering stalks on invasive weed species. Update distribution maps as needed.

Years 1 -3: Highest Priority Occurrences
Year 1 - Priority 1 Trees: Cut and remove priority 1 trees; cut and treat stumps as needed.

Years 2-3: Cut and re-treat any re-sprouting trees
Years 2-3 - Priority 1 Shrub/Groundcovers/Grasses: Remove priority 1 occurrences of giant reed, French broom, English ivy, Cape ivy, palm, veldt grass, Jubata grass, Pride of Madeira, aloe. Re-treat re-sprouts as needed.

Years 1 -5: High Priority Occurrences
Priority 2 Shrub/Groundcovers/Grasses: Remove priority 2 occurrences of French broom, Ngaio tree, ice plant, English ivy, bindweed, Himalaya blackberry, nasturtium.

Cut and re-treat any re-sprouting Priority 1 and 2 occurrences Years 6 -10: Moderate Priority Occurrences
Priority 3 Shrub/Groundcovers/Grasses: Remove priority 3 occurrences of English ivy, kikuyu grass, Himalaya blackberry, nasturtium.

Develop long-term plan for Years 10-20.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 333, Packet Page 362 Laguna Grande Regional Park
Guidelines for Invasive, Non-native Plant Species 23 September 2021 References
Baldwin, B. G., D. H. Goldman, et al. 2012. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, University of California Press.

Bossard, Carla C., et al. Invasive Plants of California’s Wildlands. University of California Press, 2000.

Calflora Database. 2021. Calflora: Information on California plants for education, research and conservation online database. Berkeley, California. https://www.calflora.org/ California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC). 2021. Cal-IPC Invasive Plant Inventory online database. https://www.cal-ipc.org/plants/inventory/
California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC). 2021 California Wildland Invasive Plants by John M.

Randall and Marc C. Hoshovsky. https://www.calipc.org/resources/library/publications/ipcw/cwip/ cal-ipc.org DiTomaso, Joseph M. Weeds of California and Other Western States, Vol 1 and Vol.2. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2007.

EMC Planning Group, 2021. Laguna Grande Regional Park Vegetation Mapping and Focused Plant Survey Results. Report prepared for BFSA., Monterey, CA. July 2021.

Gordon, Burton., 1996. Monterey Bay Area: Natural History and Cultural Imprints. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA.

Jepson Flora Project. 2021. Jepson eFlora online database. https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/ Matthews, Mary Ann, and Michael Mitchell. 2015. The Plants of Monterey County: An Illustrated Field Key, 2nd Edition. Monterey Bay Chapter, California Native Plant Society.

Mooney, Harold A., and Erika Zavaleta. Ecosystems of California. University of California Press, 2016. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctv1xxzp6
Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J.M. Evens. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA.

Tietje, William D., William L. Preston, and Anne Y. Polyakov. 2019. Natural History of the Central Coast Bioregion. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. https://oaks.cnr.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Nat-History-of-CC-BIO-2019.pdf Yeager, Rod M., and Michael Mitchell. Monterey County Wildflowers: A Field Guide. Monterey Bay Chapter, California Native Plant Society, 2016.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 334, Packet Page 363

A P P E N D I X C

W I L D L I F E A N A L Y S I S
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 335, Packet Page 364

TABLE OF CONTENTS
DRAFT Wildlife Analysis for the Biological Resources Section of the Initial Study....................................................................................................................1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 Special-Status Amphibians and Reptiles .........................................................................2 California Red‐legged Frog ...........................................................................................2 Coast Range Newt ........................................................................................................6 Western Pond Turtle ....................................................................................................7 Special-Status Birds.............................................................................................................7 Burrowing Owl.............................................................................................................7 Nesting Birds................................................................................................................9 Tricolored Blackbird....................................................................................................10 Special-Status Mammals ..................................................................................................11 American Badger ........................................................................................................11 Monterey Dusky-Footed Woodrat ..............................................................................12 Monterey Shrew..........................................................................................................13 Bats .............................................................................................................................13 Sources .........................................................................................................................15 Appendices
Appendix A Special-Status Species in the Project Vicinity Figures
Figure 1-1 Special-Status Species Known to Occur in the Project VicinityError! Bookmark not Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 336, Packet Page 365 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 337, Packet Page 366 Laguna Grande Trail Maintenance CEQA
EMC Planning Group Inc. 1

DRAFT WILDLIFE ANALYSIS FOR THE BIOLOGICAL

RESOURCES SECTION OF THE INITIAL STUDY
Introduction
This section is based on reconnaissance‐level biological field surveys conducted by EMC Planning Group biologist Patrick Furtado, M.S., on May 18, May 24, and June 15, 2021, to document existing plant communities/wildlife habitats and evaluate the potential for special‐ status species to occur on the project site. Biological resources were documented in field notes, including species observed, dominant plant communities, significant wildlife habitat characteristics, and riparian and wetland habitat. Qualitative estimations of plant cover, structure, and spatial changes in species composition were used to determine plant communities and wildlife habitats. Habitat quality and disturbance levels were also described.

Prior to conducting the survey, Mr. Furtado reviewed aerial photographs, natural resource database mapping and reports, and other relevant scientific literature. This included searching the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Endangered Species Database (USFWS 2021), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CDFW 2021), and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2021) to identify special-status plants, wildlife, and habitats known to occur in the vicinity of the project site. Special-status species in this report are those listed as Endangered, Threatened, or Rare, or as Candidates for listing by the USFWS and/or CDFW; as Species of Special Concern or Fully Protected species by the CDFW; or as Rare Plant Rank 1B or 2B species by the CNPS.

A search of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) was conducted for the target Seaside USGS quadrangle, and eight surrounding quadrangles (Monterey OE N, Marina, Salinas, Monterey, Spreckels, Soberanes Point, Mount Carmel, and Carmel Valley) to generate a list of potentially occurring special-status wildlife species in the project vicinity (CDFW 2021). Records of occurrence for special-status plants were also reviewed for those twelve USGS quadrangles in the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2021). A U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Endangered Species Program threatened and endangered species list was generated for San Benito County (USFWS 2021).

Appendix X, Special-Status Species in the Project Vicinity, presents tables with CNDDB results, which lists special-status species documented within the project vicinity, their listing status and suitable habitat description, and their potential to occur on the site. Figure X, Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 338, Packet Page 367

5.0 Section Title
2 EMC Planning Group Inc.

Special-Status Species Known to Occur in the Project Vicinity, presents a map with CNDDB results.

Critical habitat is a designation used by the USFWS for specific geographic areas that contain features essential to the conservation of an endangered or threatened species and that may require special management and protection. The project site is not within a critical habitat area.

Wildlife species identified with the potential to occur on the project site include:
▪ California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii);
▪ Coast Range newt (Taricha torosa);
▪ Western pond turtle (Emys marmorata);
▪ Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia);
▪ Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor);
▪ American badger (Taxidea taxus);
▪ Monterey dusky-footed woodrat (Neotoma fuscipes luciana); ▪ Monterey shrew (Sorex ornatus salarius);
▪ Hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus); and
▪ Townsend's big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii).

Special-Status Amphibians and Reptiles
The following special-status amphibian and reptile species occur in the project vicinity and were assessed for the potential to occur on the project site:
▪ California red-legged frog, federally listed as Threatened and a California Species of Special Concern;
▪ Coast Range newt, California Species of Special Concern; and ▪ Western pond turtle, California Species of Special Concern.

California Red‐legged Frog
A federally-listed Threatened species and California Species of Special Concern, California red‐legged frog occurs in lowlands and foothills primarily in perennial or ephemeral ponds, pools, and streams where water remains long enough
(14‐28 weeks) for breeding and metamorphosis of tadpoles. Specific breeding sites include streams, creeks, ponds, marshes, sag ponds, deep pools, backwater areas, dune ponds, lagoons, and estuaries. California red-legged frog may disperse from their aquatic breeding habitats to upland habitats during the dry season. They prefer upland habitats that provide Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 339, Packet Page 368 moisture to prevent desiccation and protection from predators, including downed logs, woody vegetation, boulders, moist leaf litter, or other refugia during the dry season. In areas where upland habitats do not contain structure, they take refuge in burrows. However, if there is sufficient water at their breeding location, they may remain in aquatic habitats year‐ round instead of moving to adjacent uplands.

During wet seasons, frogs can move long distances between habitats, traversing upland areas or ephemeral drainages. Dispersal distances are typically less than 0.3 mile, with a few individuals moving 1.2‐2.2 miles. Seeps and springs in open grasslands can function as foraging habitat or refugia for wandering frogs.

CNDDB records indicate that the closest known occurrence of California red-legged frog is approximately 2.5 miles south of the project site (Occurrence No. 939, CNDDB 2021). There are no known occurrences within the project area lake or drainages, however breeding and upland habitat is potentially present. If impacts to California red-legged frog occur, they could be significant. Implementation of mitigation measures BIO-X and BIO-X would reduce this potential, significant impact to California red-legged frog to a less-than-significant level.

BIO-X Prior to ground disturbance, a qualified biologist shall conduct a training session for all construction personnel. At a minimum, the training shall include a description of special-status species potentially occurring in the project vicinity, including, but not limited to, California red-legged frog, Coast Range newt, western pond turtle, burrowing owl, tricolored blackbird, American badger, Monterey dusky-footed woodrat, Monterey shrew, special-status bats, and nesting birds and raptors. Their habitats, general measures that are being implemented to conserve species as they relate to the project, and the boundaries within which construction activities will occur will be explained. Informational handouts with photographs clearly illustrating the species’ appearances shall be used in the training session. All new construction personnel shall undergo this mandatory environmental awareness training.

The qualified biologist will train biological monitors selected from the construction crew by the construction contractor (typically the project foreman).

Before the start of work each day, the monitor will check for animals under any equipment such as vehicles and stored pipes within active construction zones.

The monitor will also check all excavated steep-walled holes or trenches greater than one foot deep for trapped animals. If a special-status species is observed within an active construction zone, the qualified biologist will be notified immediately and all work within 50 feet of the individual will be halted and all equipment turned off until the individual has left the construction area.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 340, Packet Page 369

5.0 Section Title
4 EMC Planning Group Inc.

The Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Authority shall document evidence of completion of this training prior to ground disturbance.

BIO-X A qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction surveys following the guidance documented in the Revised Guidance on Site Assessments and Field Surveys for the California Red-legged Frog (USFWS 2005) no more than two weeks (14 days) prior to the start of construction activities. The project site will be surveyed for potential migratory and/or upland activity. The qualified biologist shall prepare a report documenting the results of the preconstruction surveys for submittal to the Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Authority prior to ground disturbance.

If California red-legged frog is found, the Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Authority will coordinate with the USFWS and/or CDFW to determine the appropriate course of action per the requirements of FESA and/or CESA (e.g., obtaining Incidental Take Permits) and implement the permit requirements prior to ground disturbance.

3. The following measures from the USFWS Programmatic Biological Opinion for Issuance of Permits under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, including Authorizations Under 22 Nationwide Permits, for Projects that May Affect the Threatened California Red-legged Frog in Nine San Francisco Bay Area Counties, California (USFWS 2014) shall be implemented:
a. Construction documents shall delineate a 100-foot boundary from the outer edge of riparian vegetation along the lake and drainages. b. A qualified biologist shall be on site during all activities within 100 feet from the outer edge of riparian vegetation along the lake or drainage that where California red-legged frog may be encountered.
c. To the extent possible, all ground-disturbing work within 100 feet from the outer edge of riparian vegetation along the lake and drainage shall be avoided between November 1 and March 31, the time period when California red-legged frogs are most likely to be moving through upland areas.
d. All ground-disturbing work within 100 feet from the outer edge of riparian vegetation should be accomplished during the dry season, with no construction activities occurring during rain events or within 24 hours following a rain event.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 341, Packet Page 370 e. Prior to construction activities, exclusionary fencing shall be placed to keep construction vehicles and personnel from impacting potentially jurisdictional waters and riparian/wetland habitat outside of work areas.

A biological monitor shall supervise the installation of exclusionary fencing and monitor at least once per week until construction is complete to ensure that the protective exclusionary fencing remains intact.

Exclusion fencing material shall be selected to avoid accidental entrapment of wildlife species, such as fencing with a smaller gauge or no gaps at all (e.g., Animex™ fencing).
f. To minimize harassment, injury, death, and harm in the form of temporary habitat disturbances, all project-related vehicle traffic shall be restricted to established roads, construction areas, equipment staging, storage, parking, and stockpile areas.
g. If a California red-legged frog is encountered, all activities which have the potential to result in the harassment, injury, or death of the individual shall be immediately halted. A qualified biologist shall then assess the situation and select a course of action that shall avoid or minimize adverse effects to the animal.
h. Uneaten human food and trash attracts crows, ravens, coyotes, and other predators of the California red-legged frog. A litter control program shall be instituted at each project site. All workers shall ensure their food scraps, paper wrappers, food containers, cans, bottles, and other trash are deposited in covered or closed trash containers. The trash containers shall be removed from the project site at the end of each working day. i. Loss of soil from run-off or erosion shall be prevented with straw bales, straw wattles, or similar means provided they do not entangle, block escape or dispersal routes of the California red-legged frog. j. No insecticides or herbicides shall be used at the project site during construction or long-term operational maintenance where there is the potential for these chemical agents to enter the river, or uplands that contain potential habitat for the California red-legged frog. k. No pets shall be permitted at the project site, to avoid and minimize the potential for harassment, injury, and death of the California red-legged frog.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 342, Packet Page 371

5.0 Section Title
6 EMC Planning Group Inc.
l. For on-site storage of pipes, conduits, and other materials that could provide shelter for special-status species, an open-top trailer shall be used to elevate the materials above ground. This is intended to reduce the potential for animals to climb into the conduits and other materials. m. To the maximum extent possible, night-time construction shall be minimized or avoided because dusk and dawn are often the times when the California red-legged frog is most actively moving and foraging. n. Plastic monofilament netting (erosion control matting), loosely woven netting, or similar material in any form shall not be used at the project site because California red-legged frogs can become entangled and trapped in them. Materials utilizing fixed weaves (strands cannot move), polypropylene, polymer, or other synthetic materials shall not be used. o. Trenches or pits one foot or deeper that are going to be left unfilled for more than 48 hours shall be securely covered with boards or other material to prevent the California red-legged frog from falling into them.

Coast Range Newt
Coast Range newt is a California Species of Special Concern. This species is endemic to California and distributed along the coast and coast range mountains from central Mendocino County south to San Diego County. It is found from sea level to at least 1,280 meters on Mt. Hamilton in Santa Clara County. Coast Range newt burrows in or uses soil, fallen logs, or debris for cover. Central California localities are found in wet forests, oak forests, chaparral, and rolling grasslands. It will occupy upland habitats when not breeding.

During reproduction, Coast Range newts will migrate to intermittent streams, rivers, lakes, and ponds where they lay eggs in shallow water attached to submerged rocks or twigs.

CNDDB records indicate one occurrence of Coast Range newt approximately six miles southwest of the project site (Occurrence No. 70, CNDDB 2021). There are no known occurrences within the project area lake or drainages, however breeding and upland habitat is potentially present. Mitigation measure BIO-X, presented above, which requires a training session on special-status species potentially present on the construction site for all personnel, and BIO-X and BIO-X, which require preconstruction surveys and measures for the protection of California red-legged frog would also protect Coast Range newt, if present.

Implementation of these measures would reduce the potential, significant impact to Coast Range newt to a less-than-significant level and no additional measures are recommended.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 343, Packet Page 372 Western Pond Turtle
Western pond turtle is a California Species of Special Concern. It is uncommon to common in suitable aquatic habitat throughout California including freshwater marshes, stock ponds, lakes, rivers, and streams. This species is considered omnivorous. Aquatic plant material, including pond lilies, beetles and a variety of aquatic invertebrates as well as fishes, frogs, and even carrion have been reported among their food. Pond turtles require basking sites such as partially submerged logs, rocks, mats of floating vegetation, or open mud banks.

Turtles slip from basking sites to underwater retreats at the approach of humans or potential predators.

CNDDB records indicate one occurrence of western pond turtle approximately 3.5 miles southwest of the project site (Occurrence No. 1014, CNDDB 2021). There are no known occurrences within the lake or drainages, however breeding and upland habitat is potentially present. Mitigation measure BIO-X, presented above, which requires a training session on special-status species potentially present on the construction site for all personnel, and BIO-X and BIO-X, which require preconstruction surveys and measures for the protection of California red-legged frog would also protect western pond turtle, if present.

Implementation of these measures would reduce the potential, significant impact to western pond turtle to a less-than-significant level and no additional measures are recommended.

Special-Status Birds
The following special-status bird species occur in the project vicinity and were assessed for the potential to occur on the project site:
▪ Burrowing owl, California Species of Special Concern; ▪ Nesting birds; protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code; and
▪ Tricolored blackbird, California Species of Special Concern.

Burrowing Owl
Burrowing owl is a California Species of Special Concern. Burrowing owls live and breed in burrows in the ground, especially in abandoned California ground squirrel burrows.

Optimal habitat conditions include large open, dry and nearly level grasslands or prairies with short to moderate vegetation height and cover, areas of bare ground, and populations of burrowing mammals. A general, non-specific record for this species has been recorded approximately 900 feet north and west of the project site (Occurrence No. 574, CNDDB 2021).

The project site’s non-native grassland provides marginally suitable foraging habitat for burrowing owl, and a few scattered small mammal burrows on the site could be utilized for nesting habitat, but burrowing owl has low potential to occur on the site. If burrowing owl is present on or adjacent to the project site, construction activities could result in the loss or Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 344, Packet Page 373

5.0 Section Title
8 EMC Planning Group Inc.
disturbance of individual animals. This would be a significant adverse environmental impact. Implementation of mitigation measures BIO-X, presented earlier, which requires a training session on special-status species potentially present on the construction site for all personnel, and BIO-X would reduce this potentially significant impact to less than significant.

Mitigation Measure
BIO-X To avoid/minimize impacts to burrowing owls potentially occurring within the project site, a biologist qualified in ornithology shall conduct surveys for burrowing owl. The approved biologist shall conduct a two-visit (i.e., morning and evening) presence/absence survey at areas of suitable habitat on and adjacent to the project site boundary no less than 14 days prior to the start of construction or ground disturbance activities. Surveys shall be conducted according to the methods for take avoidance described in the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1993) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012). If no burrowing owls are found, a letter report confirming absence will be prepared and submitted to the Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Authority and no further mitigation is required.

Because burrowing owls occupy habitat year-round, seasonal no-disturbance buffers, as outlined in the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (CBOC 1993) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012), shall be in place around occupied habitat prior to and during any ground disturbance activities. The following table includes buffer areas based on the time of year and level of disturbance (CDFW 2012), unless a qualified biologist approved by the CDFW verifies through non-invasive measures that either: 1) birds have not begun egg laying and incubation; or 2) that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival.

Location Time of Year Level of Disturbance Buffers (meters) Low Med High
Nesting Sites April 1 – Aug 15 200 m 500 m 500 m
Nesting Sites Aug 16 – Oct 15 200 m 200 m 500 m
Nesting Sites Oct 16 – Mar 31 50 m 100 m 500 m
If burrowing owl is found and avoidance is not possible, burrow exclusion may be conducted by qualified biologists only during the non-breeding season, before breeding behavior is exhibited and after Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 345, Packet Page 374 the burrow is confirmed empty through non-invasive methods, such as surveillance. Occupied burrows shall be replaced with artificial burrows at a ratio of one collapsed burrow to one constructed artificial burrow (1:1). Evicted burrowing owls may attempt to colonize or recolonize an area that would be impacted, thus ongoing surveillance during project activities shall be conducted at a rate sufficient to detect burrowing owls if they return.

If surveys locate occupied burrows in or near construction areas, consultation with the CDFW shall occur to interpret survey results and develop a project-specific avoidance and minimization approach. Once the absence of burrowing owl has been confirmed, a letter report will be prepared and submitted to the Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Authority.

Nesting Birds
Protected nesting birds have the potential to nest in buildings or structures, on open ground, or in any type of vegetation, including trees, during the nesting bird season (January 15 through September 15). The project site contains a variety of potential habitats for nesting birds. Construction activities, including ground disturbance, can impact nesting birds protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code, should nesting birds be present during construction. If protected bird species are nesting adjacent to the project site during the bird nesting season, then noise-generating construction activities could result in the loss of fertile eggs, nestlings, or otherwise lead to the abandonment of nests. Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-X, presented above, which requires a training session on special-status species potentially present on the construction site for all personnel, and BIO-X would reduce potential, significant impacts to nesting birds to less than significant.

Mitigation Measure
BIO-X To avoid impacts to nesting birds during the nesting season (January 15 through September 15), all construction activities should be conducted between September 16 and January 14, which is outside of the bird nesting season. If construction occurs during the bird nesting season, then a qualified biologist will conduct a pre-construction survey for nesting birds to ensure that no nests would be disturbed during project construction.

If project-related work is scheduled during the nesting season (February 15 to August 30 for small bird species such as passerines; January 15 to September 15 for owls; and February 15 to September 15 for other raptors), a qualified biologist shall conduct nesting bird surveys.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 346, Packet Page 375

5.0 Section Title
10 EMC Planning Group Inc.
a. Two surveys for active bird nests will occur within 14 days prior to start of construction, with the final survey conducted within 48 hours prior to construction. Appropriate minimum survey radii surrounding each work area are typically 250 feet for passerines, 500 feet for smaller raptors, and 1,000 feet for larger raptors.

Surveys will be conducted at the appropriate times of day to observe nesting activities. Locations off the site to which access is not available may be surveyed from within the site or from public areas. If no nesting birds are found, a letter report confirming absence will be prepared and submitted to the Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Authority and no further mitigation is required.
b. If the qualified biologist documents active nests within the project site or in nearby surrounding areas, an appropriate buffer between each nest and active construction shall be established. The buffer shall be clearly marked and maintained until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. Prior to construction, the qualified biologist shall conduct baseline monitoring of each nest to characterize “normal” bird behavior and establish a buffer distance, which allows the birds to exhibit normal behavior. The qualified biologist shall monitor the nesting birds daily during construction activities and increase the buffer if birds show signs of unusual or distressed behavior (e.g., defensive flights and vocalizations, standing up from a brooding position, and/or flying away from the nest). If buffer establishment is not possible, the qualified biologist or construction foreman shall have the authority to cease all construction work in the area until the young have fledged and the nest is no longer active. Once the absence of nesting birds has been confirmed, a letter report will be prepared and submitted to the Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Authority.

Tricolored Blackbird
Tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor) is a California Species of Special Concern found mostly throughout the Central Valley and San Francisco Bay Delta regions. Tricolored blackbirds forage in annual grasslands; wet and dry vernal pools and other seasonal wetlands; and croplands. They also forage occasionally in riparian scrub habitats and along marsh borders. Tricolored blackbirds nest near freshwater marshes. There are CNDDB records indicating tricolored blackbird activity within five miles of the project site, and Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 347, Packet Page 376 riparian and wetland vegetation along the lake and drainage may support this species.

Measures recommended for the protection of nesting birds (above) are anticipated to determine if tricolored blackbirds are present and provide protection during construction, if needed.

Special-Status Mammals
The following special-status bird species occur in the project vicinity and were assessed for the potential to occur on the project site:
▪ American badger, California Species of Special Concern; ▪ Monterey dusky-footed woodrat, California Species of Special Concern; ▪ Hoary bat, California Species of Special Concern; and ▪ Townsend’s big-eared bat, California Species of Special Concern.

American Badger
American badger is a California Species of Special Concern. It is an uncommon, permanent resident found throughout most of the state, except in the northern North Coast area. This large member of the weasel family uses most shrub, forest, and herbaceous habitats with friable soils suitable for burrows. Prey species include fossorial rodents such as rats, mice, chipmunks, ground squirrels, and pocket gophers. Badger diet shifts seasonally depending on the availability of prey and may also include reptiles, insects, earthworms, eggs, birds, and carrion. Mixed oak woodland, coastal scrub, and grassland habitats provide cover, drier soils for burrowing, and prey resources for this species. A historic record for American badger was recorded approximately 700 feet east of the project site (Occurrence No. 171, CDFW 2021), and a more recent (1992) observation was recorded approximately 2.3 miles east of the project site (Occurrence No. 241, CDFW 2021). Open grassland areas and openings along trails provide suitable habitat for the American badger. American badgers are known to occur in the region and could den and forage on the project site. Ground disturbance could result in impacts to this species from direct mortality or injury. Loss or harm to American badger is considered a significant adverse impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-X, presented above, which requires a training session on special-status species potentially present on the construction site for all personnel, and BIO-X would reduce potential, significant impacts to American badger to less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
BIO-X Not more than 14 days prior to the commencement of ground-disturbing activities, a qualified wildlife biologist shall conduct surveys of the grassland habitat on site to identify any potential American badger burrows/dens. If the survey results are negative (i.e., no badger dens observed), a letter report Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 348, Packet Page 377

5.0 Section Title
12 EMC Planning Group Inc.
confirming absence will be prepared and submitted to the Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Authority and no further mitigation is required.

If the results are positive (badger dens are observed), the qualified biologist shall determine if the dens are active by installing a game camera for three days and three nights to determine if the den is in use.
a. If the biologist determines that a den may be active, coordination with the CDFW shall be undertaken to develop a suitable strategy to avoid impacts to American badger. The strategy may include the following: the biologist shall install a one-way door in the den opening and continue use of the game camera. Once the camera captures the individual exiting the one-way door, the den can be excavated with hand tools to prevent badgers from reusing them. If the biologist determines that the den is a maternity den, construction activities shall be delayed during the maternity season (February to August), or until the badgers leave the den on their own accord or the biologist determines that the den is no longer in use. b. If the game camera does not capture an individual entering/exiting the den, the den can be excavated with hand tools to prevent badgers from reusing them.

After dens have been excavated and the absence of American badger confirmed, a letter report will be prepared and submitted to the Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Authority.

Monterey Dusky-Footed Woodrat
The Monterey dusky-footed woodrat is a California species of Special Concern typically found within dens chaparral or oak woodland habitats with moderately dense understory growth and abundant dead wood for nest construction. Monterey dusky-footed woodrat is known to occur in the project vicinity and woodland and riparian habitat at the project site is considered potential habitat. Removal or disturbance of habitat during nesting season is considered a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-X, presented above, which requires a training session on special-status species potentially present on the construction site for all personnel, and BIO-X would reduce potential, significant impacts to Monterey dusky-footed woodrat to less than significant.

Mitigation Measure
BIO-X A qualified biologist shall conduct pre-construction surveys for woodrat nests within the trail improvement area. All woodrat nests shall be flagged for avoidance of direct construction impacts where feasible. If impacts cannot be avoided, woodrat nests shall be dismantled no more than three days prior to Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 349, Packet Page 378 dismantling so that the occupants do not attempt to rebuild. Nests are to be slowly dismantled by hand in order to allow the occupants to disperse.

Monterey Shrew
The Monterey shrew is a California species of Special Concern. This species is an endemic subspecies of shrew occurring only on the Monterey Peninsula. Preferred habitats include riparian areas and other moist microclimates with available insect prey. Little is known about this species, since it is difficult to locate and does not survive well in traps due to very high metabolic rates. A general observation of this species has been recorded to include the project site; however, the record is from 1919 and it the current distribution of Monterey shrew in the area is unknown (Occurrence No. 3, CDFW 2021). Riparian and woodland habitats within the project area could support this species, if present. Construction activities at the project site could result in the loss of individuals on or adjacent to the project site.

Mitigation measure BIO-X, presented above, which requires a training session on specialstatus species potentially present on the construction site for all personnel, and BIO-X and BIO-X, which require preconstruction surveys and measures for the protection of California red-legged frog would also protect Monterey shrew, if present. Implementation of these measures would reduce the potential, significant impact to Monterey shrew to a less-thansignificant level and no additional measures are recommended.

Bats
Trees and/or buildings or structures on or adjacent to the project site could provide roosting habitat for state-listed species of special concern hoary bat and Townsend's big-eared bat.

Hoary bat is a solitary species that generally prefers dense foliage of medium to large trees.

Townsend’s big-eared bat prefers roosting and nesting found in caves, tunnels, mines, and buildings. These species have been identified as occurring within 1.2 and seven miles to the west and east of the project site, however little is known about their distribution in the project vicinity (CNDDB 2021). Construction activities at the project site could result in the disturbance of roost and natal sites occupied by special-status bats on or adjacent to the project site, if present. Implementation of mitigation measures BIO-X, presented earlier, which requires a training session on special-status species potentially present on the construction site for all personnel, and BIO-X would reduce this potential, significant impact to special-status bats to a less-than-significant level.

Mitigation Measure
BIO-X Approximately 14 days prior to tree removal or construction activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a habitat assessment for bats and potential roosting sites in trees to be removed, in trees within 50 feet of the construction easement. These surveys shall include a visual inspection of potential roosting features (bats need not be present) and a search for presence of guano within the project site, Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 350, Packet Page 379

5.0 Section Title
14 EMC Planning Group Inc.
construction access routes, and 50 feet around these areas. Cavities, crevices, exfoliating bark, and bark fissures that could provide suitable potential nest or roost habitat for bats shall be surveyed. Assumptions can be made on what species is present due to observed visual characteristics along with habitat use, or the bats can be identified to the species level with the use of a bat echolocation detector such as an “Anabat” unit. Potential roosting features found during the survey shall be flagged or marked.

If no roosting sites or bats are found, a letter report confirming absence shall be prepared and submitted to Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Authority and no further mitigation is required.

If bats or roosting sites are found, bats shall not be disturbed without specific notice to and consultation with CDFW.

If bats are found roosting outside of the nursery season (May 1 through October 1), CDFW shall be consulted prior to any eviction or other action. If avoidance or postponement is not feasible, a Bat Eviction Plan will be submitted to CDFW for written approval prior to project implementation. A request to evict bats from a roost includes details for excluding bats from the roost site and monitoring to ensure that all bats have exited the roost prior to the start of activity and are unable to re-enter the roost until activity is completed. Any bat eviction shall be timed to avoid lactation and young-rearing. If bats are found roosting during the nursery season, they shall be monitored to determine if the roost site is a maternal roost. This could occur by either visual inspection of the roost bat pups, if possible, or by monitoring the roost after the adults leave for the night to listen for bat pups. Because bat pups cannot leave the roost until they are mature enough, eviction of a maternal roost cannot occur during the nursery season. Therefore, if a maternal roost is present, a 50-foot buffer zone (or different size if determined in consultation with the CDFW) shall be established around the roosting site within which no construction activities including tree removal or structure disturbance shall occur until after the nursery season.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 351, Packet Page 380

SOURCES

1. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. State of California Natural Resources Agency.

2. CDFW. 2018. Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18959&inline.

3. CDFW. 2021. Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS) online database. http://bios.dfg.ca.gov

4. CDFW. 2021. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) online database. https://wildlife.ca.gov/data/cnddb

5. California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2001. CNPS Botanical Survey Guidelines. https://cnps.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/cnps_survey_guidelines.pdf.

6. California Native Plant Society. 2021. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California online database. http://www.rareplants.cnps.org

7. Jameson, E. W., and Hans J. Peeters. 2004. Mammals of California. University of California Press.

8. Thomson, R. C. 2016. California Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern, University of California Press.

9. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2005. Revised Guidance on Site Assessments and Field Surveys for the California Red-legged Frog.

10. USFWS. 2014. USFWS Programmatic Biological Opinion for Issuance of Permits under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, including Authorizations Under 22 Nationwide Permits, for Projects that May Affect the Threatened California Red-legged Frog in Nine San Francisco Bay Area Counties, California.

11. USFWS. 2021. National Wetlands Inventory online database. U.S. Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/

12. USFWS. 2021. Endangered Species Program online database. Species list for San Benito County. Washington, D.C. http://www.fws.gov/endangered/ Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 352, Packet Page 381 Monterey
pine
Monterey pine
Monterey pine
Monterey pine
Eastwood's
goldenbush
Eastwood's
goldenbush
American
badger
Salinas
harvest
mouse
Kellogg's
horkelia
Jolon clarkia
Central
Maritime
Chaparral
Monterey
shrew
Eastwood's
goldenbush
seaside
bird's-beak
Smith's blue
butterfly
burrowing owl
northern
curly-leaved
monardella
northern curly-leaved
monardella
northern
curly-leaved
monardella
Yadon's rein orchid
Yadon's
rein orchid
Yadon's
rein
orchid
Yadon's
rein orchid
Pajaro
manzanita
sandmat manzanita sandmat
manzanita
sandmat
manzanita
sandmat
manzanita
sandmat
manzanita
sandmat
manzanita
sandmat manzanita
sandmat manzanita
globose
dune beetle Eastwood's
goldenbush
pine rose
sand-loving wallflower
Northern
California
legless lizard
Northern
California
legless lizard
Northern California
legless
lizard
Monterey spineflower
Monterey
spineflower
Monterey spineflower
Monterey spineflower
Northern
California
legless lizard
Northern California
legless
lizard
Northern
California
legless lizard
Northern
California legless
lizard
Northern
California
legless lizard
sand-loving
wallflower
Monterey
spineflower
Monterey spineflower
Monterey gilia
sandmat manzanita
Monterey
gilia
Eastwood's goldenbush
Monterey
spineflower
Northern California
legless
lizard
sand-loving
wallflower
sand-loving
wallflower
Monterey
spineflower
Monarch
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
0 1,300 feet
Laguna Grande Trail Maintenance CEQA
Special-Status Species Known to Occur in the Project Vicinity Figure X
Source: ESRI 2021, CDFW CNDDB 2021 Approximate Park Boundary 1-Mile Radius
Special-Status Plants
Special-Status Wildlife
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 353, Packet Page 382

A P P E N D I X D

C O M M U N I T Y O U T R E A C H

M A T E R I A L S
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 354, Packet Page 383 A town hall meeting to discuss
maintenance of trails and vegetation
at Laguna Grande Park.
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86977507440
Meeting ID: 869 7750 7440
Call-In (English): +1(669)900-6833
ID: 869 7750 7440#
Laguna Grande Park
Virtual Town Hall
Wednesday, July 28, 2021
6:30 PM - 8:00 PM
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 355, Packet Page 384 Una junta comunitaria para discutir el
mantenimiento de los senderos y la
vegetación en Laguna Grande Park
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86977507440
Meeting ID: 869 7750 7440
Llamada (Ingles ): +1(669)900-6833
ID: 869 7750 7440#
Laguna Grande Park
Junta Comunitaria
Miercoles, 28 de julio de 2021
6:30 PM - 8:00 PM
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 356, Packet Page 385 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 357, Packet Page 386 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 358, Packet Page 387 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 359, Packet Page 388 Seeking public input on the maintenance of
trails and vegetation at Laguna Grande Park
Meet at Hillside BBQ Space #1
Parking at the Eucalyptus Lot
Laguna Grande Park
Community Site Walk
Saturday, August 14th 2021
10 AM - 12:00 PM
https://haveyoursaymonterey.org/laguna-grande-park-plan Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 360, Packet Page 389 Caminata por el sitio
de la communidad
Laguna Grande
Sábado, 14 de agosto de 2021
10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
https://haveyoursaymonterey.org/laguna-grande-park-plan Nos reuniremos en Hillside BBQ, espacio #1
Estacionamiento en Eucalyptus
Estamos buscando ideas y sugerencias
sobre el mantenimiento de los senderos y de
la vegetación del parque Laguna Grande
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 361, Packet Page 390 Laguna
Grande
Park
Site Walk
August 14th, 2021
Site walk notes
Stop #1 Stop #4
Stop #2 Stop #5
Stop #3 Stop #6
Site walk notes
www.haveyoursaymonterey.org/laguna-grandepark-plan
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 362, Packet Page 391 N

SEASIDE

CANYON DEL REY BOULEVARD

FREMONT BOULEVARD

DEL MONTE BOULEVARD

MONTEREY
Laguna Grande Park
www.haveyoursaymonterey.org/laguna-grandepark-plan
1 2
3 4 5
6 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 363, Packet Page 392

L A G U N A G R A N D E

SEASIDE

CANYON DEL REY BOULEVARD

NORTH FREMONT STREET

MONTEREY

DEL MONTE AVENUE
CASANOVA AVE.

ENGLISH AVE.

VIRGIN AVE.

HILBY AVE.

HARCOUT AVE.

SONOMA AVE.

NORTH FREMONT STREET

CANYON DEL REY BOULEVARD
WILLIAMS AVE.

GRANT AVE.

MONTECITO AVE.

BRANNER AVE.

L. GRANDE CT.

FORTAG TRAIL ALIGNMENT OPTIONS
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 364, Packet Page 393

L A G U N A G R A N D E

SEASIDE

CANYON DEL REY BOULEVARD

NORTH FREMONT STREET

MONTEREY

DEL MONTE AVENUE
CASANOVA AVE.

ENGLISH AVE.

VIRGIN AVE.

HILBY AVE.

HARCOUT AVE.

SONOMA AVE.

NORTH FREMONT STREET

CANYON DEL REY BOULEVARD
WILLIAMS AVE.

GRANT AVE.

MONTECITO AVE.

BRANNER AVE.

L. GRANDE CT.

WHERE DO YOU LIVE?
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 365, Packet Page 394

L A G U N A G R A N D E

SEASIDE

CANYON DEL REY BOULEVARD

NORTH FREMONT STREET

MONTEREY

DEL MONTE AVENUE
CASANOVA AVE.

ENGLISH AVE.

VIRGIN AVE.

HILBY AVE.

HARCOUT AVE.

SONOMA AVE.

NORTH FREMONT STREET

CANYON DEL REY BOULEVARD
WILLIAMS AVE.

GRANT AVE.

MONTECITO AVE.

BRANNER AVE.

L. GRANDE CT.

HABITAT COMMUNITIES
NORTH
Alnus rhombifolia -
White Alder
Phragmites australis -
Common Reed
Invasive Species
Salix lasiolepis -
Arroyo Willow
Schoenoplectus acutus -
Tule
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 366, Packet Page 395 20210818_Laguna Grande Park_Site Walk Summary_BFS
August 23, 2021
MEMO TO: Chris Schmidt / Planner
City of Monterey
CC: City of Seaside and Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District FROM: Beth Matz, BFS Landscape Architects
RE: LAGUNA GRANDE SITE WALK AUGUST 14th, 2021 – MEETING NOTES & PUBLIC

COMMENTS
ATTENDEES:

City of Seaside:

Ian Oglesby
Dave Pacheco
Daniel Meewis
MPRPD:

Kevin Raskoff
Caine Camarillo
City of Monterey:

Thys Norton
Louie Marcuzzo
Chris Schmidt
BFS Landscape
Architects:

Mike Bellinger
Beth Matz
Payam Ostovar
Daniel Zuercher
MEETING AGENDA MINUTES:
10:15 – 10:30: Attendees gathered at the Hillside BBQ space in the Eucalyptus parking lot. While waiting attendees were able to review maps of the park outlining habitat communities and showing proposed FORTAG trail alignment options. Attendees were asked to identify areas of concern with orange stickers. See maps below. See Sign-in Sheets for event participants.
10:30 – 11:15: The (32) attendees were split into two groups to begin the site walk around the lake and discuss key points of the park. See map below for key points:
11:15: The two groups reconvened at the south bridge to walk and discuss the forebay section of the park. 12:15 – 12:30: The group returned to the Hillside BBQ space, finishing the site walk.

MEETING SUMMARY:

1. Primary urgency for residents was the forebay area

2. Participants favored both accessibility improvements and vegetation maintenance

3. Participants were not overly interested in adding ‘more’ lake access points or extending sightlines across the lake

4. Participants desire to have sightlines along the main path be clear and vegetation be managed to open up views around the curves of the path and where the paths or lake access points branch off of trail

5. Participants were supportive to protect habitat areas and extend habitat resources

6. Participants want a transparent decision-making process and the opportunity to review materials and decisions being made
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 367, Packet Page 396 BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Monday, August 23, 2021 Page 2 Of 6

7. Participants want clear delineation on where the City of Seaside and City of Monterey boundary occurs in the park

8. Aesthetics of the park was not a priority; many participants enjoy the park character as is

9. Participants are frustrated by the slow-moving process for mitigating and reducing illegal camping.

Participants feel like they’ve been put on the backburner for 10 years.

ACTION ITEMS AND NEXT STEPS

1. BFS and JPA staff to respond to participant questions by September 24th. a. Where are the City property lines
b. Is trail resurfacing apart of the project
c. What is the schedule for the project
d. What lighting levels are optimal for park safety
e. What is the budget for the strategy plan and for the maintenance work to occur? Where is funding coming from?

2. Action Item: BFS to provide schedule for project webpage to show deliverables, public meetings, and process

3. Action Item: BFS to provide meeting minutes and site video for project webpage

4. Action Item: JPA provide noticing for next public meeting SITE WALK COMMENTS:

Stop 1: Eucalyptus Parking Lot and Picnic Area
• Concern about the JPA making decisions without the community’s input • Concern about water quality of lake and the ditch around the perimeter of the forebay • Comment: Adjust benches to enhance visibility
• Question: Are trails to be resurfaced as part of maintenance plan? • Question: What is the maintenance plan for the bridge? Stop 2: Lakeside Parking Lot and Picnic Area
• Comment: Preference for consistent paving materials throughout the park • Comment: Repair all trails and pathways within the park • Comment: Preference for D.G. paving materials due to its natural look and maintenance • Comment: Improve visibility of docks from path, need to be able to see if someone is using the dock
• Comment: Improve accessibility to docks from pathway
• Comment: Open up views to the lake, add more benches for better views • Comment: Cut back vegetation at curves in pathway to open-up sightlines • Comment: Sightlines across lake not as important as sightlines along path • Comment: There are not enough trash cans
• Question: Why is there wire fence along lake edge?
Stop 3: North Bridge adjacent to Holiday Inn Express
• Comment: There are not enough trash cans and litter is thrown in the reeds/vegetation • Comment; Adding benches and picnic tables would be nice along the trail • Question: What level of lighting is allowed in habitat areas • Comment: Current light fixtures are not attractive
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 368, Packet Page 397 BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Monday, August 23, 2021 Page 3 Of 6 • Comment: Light fixtures need to be tamper proof
• Comment: The section of park path near the large viewing dock is low and floods during wet season • Comment: Nearby businesses need to get involved
• Comment: Clear out vegetation around the dock
• Comment: There is so much vegetation around the lake that you can’t tell there is a trail. Open up site lines to rest of trail to help draw people into the park • Question: Will the plan address accessibility issues? (ie gap at bridge and trail) • Question: Is it feasible to use goats for vegetation maintenance? • Question: Who is responsible for maintenance?
• Question: How is maintenance funded and budgeted?
Stop 4: North-Western Habitat Area at English Street
• Comment: Clean up understory and limb up canopy to allow views around corners of trail • Comment: Culverts are eroded and need repair / replacement • Comment: Thys Norton from Monterey Parks does a good job keeping trail areas clear • Comment: Monterey did major clearing along the informal trails to access illegal camping in this area; residents were not happy, but it has grown back very quickly • Comment: Mowing the bull rush is good, but it does grow back quickly • Comment: The mulched trails in the area helped reduce the encampments • Comment: Check out the website birdability.org-Advocates to create birding opportunities for everyone
• Comment: Monterey Audobon members acknowledge this as a prime bird area • Concern: Accessibility varies through the park and the trails. Habitat area is not accessible • Question: Are there noise abatement options?
• Comment: There are several feral cats that live with in the park • Question Is boardwalk decking an option in low lying areas? • Comment: There is car camping around the perimeter of the park and the parking lots • Comment: Resident still doesn’t go into the habitat areas where trails have been cleared. Resident doesn’t like not being able to see what she is walking up too (ie people congregated or hanging out)
• Comment: Strong support for the habitat area from Monterey Audobon member-would like more park spaces like this space
Stop 5: Laguna Grande Park Soccer Field/Playground/Picnic Area at Virgin Street • Comment: Move playfield fence to the water side of the trail • Comment: This is a good area to install senior work out equipment, similar to El Estero Park • Comment: There are issues with soccer balls going over the fence and into the lake . People go past fence to access the lake
• Question: Should the pathway fence taller?
• Comment: Lift understory and canopy to open up views to lake • Concern that the reeds will fill in the lake
• Comment: Eating areas and trash cans should be in one place • Comment: Add benches or picnic table for watching soccer and enjoying the area • Comment: Pathway sightlines are well maintained in this stretch of the park Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 369, Packet Page 398 BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Monday, August 23, 2021 Page 4 Of 6 • Comment: Not a priority to add more lake access along western side of park • Question: Where are the city property lines?
Stop 6: Southern Park Extents
• General consensus: Majority of group do not go back into this space, most do not feel comfortable or safe in this space
• General Consensus: Deter illegal camping, open sightlines and provide access for emergency services
• Comment: Pathway width is comfortable and D.G. material is consistent with park character • Comment: Lack of comfort is due to the limited outlet • Question: Is the water quality of the ditch going to be tested? • Discussion: Re-alignment of existing pathway (potentially to become the FORTAG trail connector) to be closer to Canyon Del Rey
o Opportunities: improve pathway visibility
o Opportunities: expand habitat space to offset mitigation required to further develop trails within sensitive habitat areas
o Opportunities: adding more bioswales and drainage features will continue to add to habitat diversity
o Clarification: The FORTAG Trail connector is not a part of the project and development of the trail will not be given priority over mitigating the safety issues of concerned residents o Comment: Residents were promised for multiple years an action plan to deal with illegal camping
o Comment: Vegetation maintenance and new trail development in the ‘forebay’ habitat area should be the number one priority for the strategy plan • Comment: Trails in the forebay area can be mulch similar to the north-west habitat area. • Question: Who manages the forebay area? Which City is the forebay area located in? • Comment: Residents have proposed to City staff the desire for a dog park in the Seaside maintenance/storage area. Dog Park would provide “eyes on” / visibility and extra egress from the forebay
• Comment: Adding lighting would help with safety concerns. • Comment: Noise from the illegal camping does impact residents • Comment: Fire danger from illegal camping is a concern. Residents acknowledge improvements due to consistent vegetation maintenance – but they want to know the plan • Comment: Provide accessible route from corner of N. Fremont down into the park. • Comment: Illegal camping has noticeably been reduced, thanks to the municipalities • Comment: Prioritize the forebay – that’s what has been promised • Question: What is the project schedule?
• Question: What happened to the MPRPD budget of $65,000 that was set aside for the project • Question: How much is the consultant getting paid
• Question: When is the masterplan scheduled to occur?
• Question: What is the next step? How does the review process work Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 5., Item Page 370, Packet Page 399 Council
Agenda Report
№10/13
FROM: Rafaela T. King, CPA, MBA, Finance Director
Prepared by: Youssef Hanalla, CPA, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Establish the 2023-24 Appropriation Limit (Gann Initiative) (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution, required by the 1979 passage of Proposition 4, an initiative constitutional amendment, to establish the appropriation limitation for the City of Monterey for fiscal year 2023-24.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

At the November 6, 1979 statewide general election, the voters approved Proposition 4, also known as the Gann Initiative. This law placed a ceiling on the amount of tax revenues that governmental agencies in the State of California could spend in any fiscal year. This ceiling must be calculated each year based upon a formula, which takes into consideration the California per capita income increase, and the population increase or decrease within each governmental jurisdiction. The legislative body in each jurisdiction must set, by resolution, this appropriation limitation.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

This action has no direct fiscal impact on the City. The attached resolution establishes the appropriation limit for the City of Monterey at $156,668,567 for fiscal year 2023-24, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, this matter is not a project.

Because this matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project.

Date: 6/6/2023
Item No.: 6.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 1, Packet Page 400 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City must comply with California law. The City may choose, however, what factor to use to determine the change in the cost of living and to determine the change in the population as described below.

DISCUSSION:

In November 1979, the voters approved Proposition 4, an initiative that added Article XIII B to the California Constitution. Starting in the 1980-1981 fiscal year, this constitutional amendment, popularly known as the Gann initiative, restricts the amount of government revenue which may be appropriated in any fiscal year. Government Code section 7900 et seq. specifies the calculation to be used to determine local government appropriation limits and appropriations subject to the limitation.

For the City to calculate its appropriation limit, it was necessary to establish what the agency appropriated from tax revenues in fiscal year 1978-79, the base year of the Gann Initiative from which all the figures are calculated. The City must adjust its appropriation limit for two factors:
(1) the change in the cost of living; and (2) the change in population. These two factors have been in effect since 1990, and the law allows a couple of choices for each of these factors. The City may determine the percentage change in the cost of living based on the percentage change in California per capita personal income from the preceding year or based on the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year for the City due to the additional of local nonresidential new construction. (California Constitution Article XIII B section 8(E)(2).) The City may determine the percentage change in population based on the population within the city or the percentage change in population in the county.

Staff has calculated and recommends adopting the appropriation limit based on the percentage of change of the population in the county and the percentage change in California per capita personal income as calculated by the Department of Finance.

Using the base year and the annual inflation factors since the initiative passed in 1979, the allowable appropriations limit for fiscal year 2023-24 has reached $156,668,567, as shown in the attached chart. This figure, when compared with the applicable taxes expected to be collected of $94,061,876, shows that the City is well within its limits. The City is at approximately 60.04% of the allowable taxing limit.

Consistent with the purpose of Government Code section 7910(a), the City has made its appropriation limit documentation and calculations available to the public at least 15 days prior to June 6, 2023.

RTK/ss
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. State of California, Price and Population Letter May 2023

3. Article XIIIB Appropriation Limit Calculations
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 2, Packet Page 401 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№12/12

MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION

XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION (GANN INITIATIVE)
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey is required to comply with Section XIIIB of the California Constitution, enacted by Proposition 4 in 1979; WHEREAS, the appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2023-24 was found to be $156,668,567;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, this matter is not a project. Because this matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby found and determined:

1. That during the fiscal year 2022-23 the California per capita income increased 4.44% and the population of the County of Monterey increased by 0.08%.

2. That the appropriations limit for fiscal year 2023-24 is $156,668,567.

3. That the appropriations subject to limitation for fiscal year 2023-24 are $94,061,876.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 3, Packet Page 402

May 2023
Dear Fiscal Officer:

Subject: Price Factor and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2227 requires the Department of Finance (Finance) to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2023, in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year 2023-24. Attachment A provides the change in California’s per capita personal income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to calculate the 2023-24 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides the city and unincorporated county population percentage change. Attachment C provides the population percentage change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.

Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2228 provides additional information regarding the appropriations limit.

Article XIII B, section 9(C) of the California Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate. The code section and the California Constitution can be accessed at the following website: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtml.

Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this requirement should be directed to their county, district legal counsel, or the law itself. No state agency reviews the local appropriations limits.

Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller’s Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2023.

Please Note: The prior year’s city population estimates may be revised. The per capita personal income change is based on historical data.

If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at (916) 323-4086.

JOE SPEPHENSHAW
Director
By:

Erika Li
Chief Deputy Director
Attachment
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 4, Packet Page 403

May 2023
Attachment A
A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used in setting the fiscal year 2023-24 appropriation limit is:

Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2023-24 4.44
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2023-24 appropriation limit.
2023-24:

Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 4.44 percent
Population Change = -0.35 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 4.44 + 100 = 1.0444 100
Population converted to a ratio: -0.35 + 100 = 0.9965
100
Calculation of factor for FY 2023-24: 1.0444 x 0.9965 = 1.0407 ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 5, Packet Page 404

Fiscal Year 2023-24
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2022 to January 1, 2023 and Total Population, January 1, 2023 County
City
Percent Change
2022-2023
--- Population Minus Exclusions ---
1-1-22 1-1-23
Total
Population
1-1-2023
Monterey
Carmel-By-The-Sea
Del Rey Oaks
Gonzales
Greenfield
King City
Marina
Monterey
Pacific Grove
Salinas
Sand City
Seaside
Soledad
Unincorporated
-0.49
-0.32
-0.61

1.14 3.71

2.51 -0.49
-0.16
-0.17

0.80 0.11

0.37 -0.52
3,048
1,545
8,351
19,693
13,323
21,527
23,869
14,765
159,745
373
27,647
19,262
104,324
3,033
1,540
8,300
19,917
13,817
22,068
23,753
14,741
159,475
376
27,678
19,333
103,785
3,033
1,540
8,300
19,917
13,817
22,068
26,845
14,741
159,475
376
29,790
26,230
104,236
County Total 0.08 417,472 417,816 430,368
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 6, Packet Page 405 ATTACHMENT 3
Price Adjustment Population Adjustment
Fiscal
Year
The Lessor of C.P.I. or Per Capita
Income (% change) % Change in City Population
Combined
Adjustment
Appropriation
Limit
1978‐79 Base Year Base Year $ 14,797,091
1979‐80 10.17 ‐1.17 1.0888 16,111,222
1980‐81 12.11 ‐2.10 1.0976 17,682,983
1981‐82 9.12 1.11 1.1033 19,509,853
1982‐83 6.79 ‐0.61 1.0614 20,707,481
1983‐84 2.35 2.97 1.0539 21,823,572
1984‐85 4.74 1.15 1.0594 23,120,867
1985‐86 3.74 2.13 1.0595 24,496,480
1986‐87 2.30 2.74 1.0510 25,746,540
CA Per Capita Income % Change * City or County Population % Change 1987‐88 3.50 1.51 1.0506 27,050,049
1988‐89 4.70 2.13 1.0693 28,924,647
1989‐90 5.19 0.88 1.0612 30,693,583
1990‐91 4.21 1.62 1.0590 32,503,953
1991‐92 4.14 2.65 1.0690 34,746,632
1992‐93 ‐0.64 2.29 1.0164 35,314,859
1993‐94 2.72 2.53 1.0532 37,193,610
1994‐95 0.71 3.69 1.0443 38,841,287
1995‐96 4.72 1.97 1.0678 41,474,726
1996‐97 4.67 1.51 1.0625 44,066,896
1997‐98 4.67 2.63 1.0742 47,336,660
1998‐99 4.15 4.70 1.0904 51,615,894
1999‐00 4.53 2.93 1.0759 55,533,540
2000‐01 4.91 3.32 1.0839 60,192,804
2001‐02 7.82 1.73 1.0969 66,022,477
2002‐03 ‐1.27 1.35 1.0006 66,064,071
2003‐04 2.31 1.11 1.0345 68,340,639
2004‐05 3.28 1.56 1.0489 71,682,496
2005‐06 5.26 0.13 1.0530 75,481,668
2006‐07 3.96 0.38 1.0436 78,768,895
2007‐08 4.42 0.67 1.0510 82,786,109
2008‐09 4.29 1.56 1.0592 87,684,563
2009‐10 0.62 1.45 1.0207 89,499,633
2010‐11 ‐2.54 1.37 0.9879 88,416,687
2011‐12 2.51 0.63 1.0316 91,210,654
2012‐13 3.77 0.91 1.0471 95,510,324
2013‐14 5.12 0.81 1.0597 101,212,290
2014‐15 ‐0.23 0.95 1.0072 101,941,019
2015‐16 3.82 0.26 1.0409 106,110,406
2016‐17 5.37 0.96 1.0638 112,881,897
2017‐18 3.69 1.00 1.0473 118,217,712
2018‐19 3.67 0.35 1.0403 122,985,249
2019‐20 3.85 0.91 1.0480 128,882,434
2020‐21 3.73 ‐0.31 1.0341 133,275,311
2021‐22 5.73 ‐0.48 1.0522 140,235,609
2022‐23 7.55 ‐0.62 1.0688 149,888,292
2023‐24 4.44 0.08 1.0452 156,668,567
*Monterey County total used

ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATIONS
(Gann Limit)
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 7, Packet Page 406 Summary of Tax Revenue ‐ from Proposed Budget 5/02/23
FY 2023‐24
Proposed Budget   % of
Limit
General Fund
Property Taxes           15,055,291
Sales Taxes           15,528,406
Transient Occupancy Tax           30,240,000
Business License Tax              3,870,000
Utility Users Tax              4,468,520
Other Taxes                 503,548
Special Revenue Funds
216 TOT ‐ Neighborhood Improvement              5,760,000 251 Gas Tax                 784,111
252 Measure S (Previously Meas P) Tax           11,852,000 918 Conference Center Fac Dist Tax              6,000,000 Total Taxes 94,061,876 $         60.04%
Allowable appropriations Limit FY 2023‐24 156,668,567 $ Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 6., Item Page 8, Packet Page 407 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Matthew Buggert, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Adopt the Annual Reports and Approve Resolutions to Set a Public Hearing Date to Levy the Annual Assessment for the Cannery Row Business Improvement District, the New Monterey Business Improvement District, and the North Fremont Business Improvement District (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council:

1. Approve each District’s advisory board;

2. Adopt the Annual Reports; and,

3. Approve the attached Resolutions to set a public hearing date of Tuesday, June 20, 2023, to levy the assessment for the 2023/2024 fiscal year.

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Business Improvement Districts (BID) provide a mechanism for a business district to collect money and create work programs targeted at their specific needs. These BIDs were formed under the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, which authorizes assessments against businesses (collected with business license taxes) to finance improvements and activities to improve specific business areas. Because 1989 Law assessments are not on real property, they are not subject to Proposition 218. BIDs are regulated by the California Streets & Highways Code sections 36500 et seq. There is no intention to make a change to any of the BIDs that would trigger the application of Proposition 26, which places limitations on local government fees. There are no changes proposed to boundaries or annual assessments for any of the BIDs.

This action confirms the City’s commitment to its partnership with these business associations.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The City of Monterey collects the BID assessment as part of the business license collection.

This money is passed directly to the Business District. Each business district has adopted a different assessment rate.

Cannery Row BID was established in 2004, and it collects a 100% surcharge to the business license fee of each business up to a maximum assessment of $5,000 per business. For Date: 6/6/2023
Item No.: 7.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 1, Packet Page 408 businesses classified as professional services, the assessment is a 25% surcharge to the business license fee with a cap of $500. The amount of revenue collected annually is approximately $130,000 - $140,000.

New Monterey BID was established in 1995, and it collects an annual assessment of 25% of the business license fee with a cap of $250. The amount of revenue collected annually is approximately $14,000.

North Fremont BID was established in 2003, and it collects an annual assessment of 25% of the business license fee with a cap of $500. The amount of revenue collected annually is approximately $18,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, this is not a project because it does not cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not subject to CEQA. Subsequent projects resulting from this funding will be reviewed for their CEQA status.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 36533, the City Council could “modify any particular contained in the report and approve it as modified. The city council shall not approve a change in the basis and method of levying assessment that would impair an authorized or executed contract to be paid from the revenues derived from the levy of assessments.” Increasing business-based assessments is not recommended without further study and determination that the increased assessment is limited to benefits or services provided directly to the charged businesses and not to others who are not charged.

DISCUSSION:

BIDs are required to prepare a report annually. This report must include:
 Any changes to the boundaries of the district.
 A list of the improvements and activities to be provided for that fiscal year.  An estimate of the cost of providing the improvements and the activities for that fiscal year.
 The method and basis of levying the assessment in sufficient detail to allow each business owner to estimate the amount of the assessment to be levied against his or her business for that fiscal year.
 The amount of any surplus or deficit revenues to be carried over from a previous year.  The amount of any contributions to be made from sources other than assessments levied.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 2, Packet Page 409 After acceptance of the reports, the City Council shall adopt Resolutions of Intention to set a public hearing date to levy annual assessments for the 2023/2024 fiscal year. The public hearing is set for Tuesday, June 20, 2023. At the public hearing, oral and written protests will be accepted. California Streets & Highways Code sections 36524-36525 establish the process for protests to be considered. If written protests are received from the owners of businesses in the proposed area which pay 50 percent or more of the assessments proposed to be levied, and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than 50 percent, no further proceedings to levy the proposed assessment shall be taken for one year from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the City Council. If the majority protest is only against the furnishing of a specified type or types of improvement or activity within the area, those types of improvements or activities shall be eliminated.

The City of Monterey will hold the public hearing on Tuesday, June 20, 2023.

KC/MB
Attachments: 1. CRBID Resolution

2. NFBID Resolution

3. NMBID Resolution

4. CRBID Annual Report with District Boundary Map

5. NFBID Annual Report with District Boundary Map

6. NMBID Annual Report with District Boundary Map
e: Bonnie Adams, Cannery Row Business Association
Christina Riddoch, New Monterey Business Association
Kelly Violini, North Fremont Business Association
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 3, Packet Page 410 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№12/12

CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE CANNERY ROW BUSINESS ASSOCIATION,

AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO ADOPT THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2023/2024 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the Cannery Row Business Association Improvement District was established in 2004;
WHEREAS, an annual report outlining the proposed budget and work plan of the Business Improvement District has been prepared;
WHEREAS, the annual report was presented to the City Council at a public meeting held on June 6, 2023, including a map of the boundaries, and both documents are on file with the City Clerk. There are no proposed changes to the boundaries of the parking and business improvement area; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, this is not a project because it does not cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not subject to CEQA. Subsequent projects resulting from this funding will be reviewed for their CEQA status.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. It is the intent of the City Council to levy and collect assessments for the Cannery Row Business Association Improvement District for fiscal year 2023/24. The District annual report and boundaries are on file in the City Clerk’s office.

2. Improvements and activities approved in the Resolution creating the District are to advocate and construct traffic and parking improvements; establish and meet cleanliness standards (trash pickup, etc.); improve the area’s streetscape; coordinate with existing businesses and the Cannery Row Marketing Council to stimulate business through collaboration; advocate Cannery Row business needs to government agencies for infrastructure and service enhancements; improve public safety; and hire a management staff to represent Cannery Row business interests in compliance with requirements as set forth in Parking and Business Improvement Area law of 1989.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 4, Packet Page 411 2 3. The program of improvements and activities are carried out by the Cannery Row Business Association. Improvements and activities proposed for 2023/24 are consistent with those approved in the resolution adopting the district, with no substantial changes from the original resolution.

4. The report on the proposed program for fiscal year 2023/24 recommends no change to boundaries or work program, and continuance of the annual assessment of 100% surcharge to the business license fee of each business, up to a maximum assessment of $5,000 per business per fiscal year. For businesses classified as professional services, the assessment shall be 25% surcharge to the business license fee, up to a maximum of $500.

5. The District’s Advisory Board is approved.

6. A public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, at or after 4:00 p.m. on the levy of the proposed assessment for the 2023/24 fiscal year. At the public hearing, written and oral protests may be made in accord with law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this 6th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 5, Packet Page 412 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№12/12

CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE NORTH FREMONT BUSINESS DISTRICT

OF MONTEREY AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO ADOPT THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2023/2024 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the North Fremont Business District of Monterey was established in 2003; WHEREAS, an annual report outlining the proposed budget and workplan of the Business Improvement District has been prepared;
WHEREAS, the annual report was presented to the City Council at a public meeting held on June 6, 2023, including a map of the boundaries, and both documents are on file with the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, this matter is not a project. Because this matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project.

Subsequent projects resulting from this funding will be reviewed for their CEQA status.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. It is the intent of the City Council to levy and collect assessments for the North Fremont Business District of Monterey for fiscal year 2023/2024. The District annual report and boundaries are on file in the City Clerk’s office.

2. Improvements and activities approved in the resolution creating the District are to promote the Business Improvement District, advocate for an increase of public transportation opportunities to North Monterey, improve streetscape appearance, and increase the overall safety of the area as set forth in Parking and Business Improvement Area law of 1989.

3. The program of improvements and activities are carried out by the North Fremont Business District of Monterey. Improvements and activities proposed for 2023/2024 are consistent with those approved in the resolution adopting the district, with no substantial changes from the original resolution.

4. The report on the proposed program for fiscal year 2023/2024 recommends no change to boundaries or work program, and continuance of the annual assessment of 25% of the business license fee for the City, but not to exceed $500.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 6, Packet Page 413 2 5. The District’s Advisory Board is approved.

6. A public hearing will be held on Tuesday June 20, 2023 at or after 4:00 p.m. on the levy of the proposed assessment for the 2023/24 fiscal year. At the public hearing, written and oral protests may be made in accord with law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this 6th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 7, Packet Page 414 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№12/12

CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE NEW MONTEREY BUSINESS ASSOCIATION

AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO ADOPT THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2023/2024 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the New Monterey Business Association Improvement District was established in 1995;
WHEREAS, an annual report outlining the proposed budget and workplan of the Business Improvement District has been prepared;
WHEREAS, the annual report and the District Boundary map were presented to the City Council during a public meeting held on June 6, 2023, and both documents are on file with the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, this matter is not a project. Because this matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project.

Subsequent projects resulting from this funding will be reviewed for their CEQA status.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. It is the intent of the City Council to levy and collect assessments for the New Monterey Business Association Improvement District for fiscal year 2023/2024. The annual report and the District boundary map are on file in the City Clerk’s office.

2. Improvements and activities approved in the resolution creating the District are to fund various public improvements, administer the business improvement district, and undertake various promotional activities as set forth in Parking and Business Improvement Area law of 1989.

3. The program of improvements and activities are carried out by the New Monterey Business Association. Improvements and activities proposed for 2023/24 are consistent with those approved in the resolution adopting the district, with no substantial changes from the original resolution.

4. The report proposing the work program for fiscal year 2023/24 recommends no change to boundaries or work program, and continuance of the annual assessment of 25% of the business license fee for the City, but not to exceed $250.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 8, Packet Page 415 2 5. The District’s Advisory Board is approved.

6. A public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 20, 2023, at or after 4:00 p.m. on the levy of the proposed assessment for the 2023/2024 fiscal year. At the public hearing, written and oral protests may be made in accord with law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this 6th day of June 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 9, Packet Page 416 Attachment 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 10, Packet Page 417

CRBA DRAFT PROJECTED WORKPLAN
2023/2024
Draft

SUMMARY:

COMMITTEE BUDGET
STREETSCAPE $ 7,300
GENERAL MAINTENANCE $ 76,000
BANNER PROGRAM $ 8,500
HISTORICAL IDENTITY PLAN $ 28,500
ADMINISTRATION/OVERHEAD $ 53,850
NEW PROJECTS $ 30,100
TOTAL: $204,250
Attachment 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 11, Packet Page 418

CRBA DRAFT PROJECTED WORKPLAN
2023/2024
Draft
STREETSCAPE:

ITEM BUDGET
Equipment Maintenance
- re-powder sign pedestals (25)
- re-powder coat street sign base (2)
-power wash all trash cans
- purchase two shark butt cans
$ 3,800
$ 400
$ 600
$ 2,500
Total: $ 7,300
Attachment 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 12, Packet Page 419

CRBA DRAFT PROJECTED WORKPLAN
2023/2024
Draft
GENERAL MAINTENANCE:

ITEM BUDGET
Power Wash both sides of street: |
3 rd week of month Tues/Wed
March – October
CR: El Torito to Aquarium
2x per year (May & August)
CR: Charthouse to Mty Bay Inn
2x per year (June & August)
Wave: Reeside-David
Sub Total: $21,000
Porter Service to include:

Peak Season: March 15 – Dec 15
Thurs – Monday (off Tuesday/Wednesday)
Off Peak Season: Dec 15 – March 14
Friday, Saturday, Sunday
Additional Holiday/Special events:

President’s Day/spring break/Memorial Day/ 4
th of July/Car
Week/Races/Labor Day/Christmas to New Year
Special events – 1
st shift 8 – 4:30 / 2nd shift noon – 8p:

Sub Total:
$55,000
F/T employee
$4,578 per month
TOTAL: $76,000
Attachment 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 13, Packet Page 420

CRBA DRAFT PROJECTED WORKPLAN
2023/2024
Draft
BANNERS:

ITEM BUDGET
Brackets
Banner Maintenance
$ 500
$ 500
Banner Replacement Installation $ 500
Banner Storage $ 500
Banner Replacement $ 1,500
Patriotic Banner Program *
Emergency Fund
$ 4,000
$ 1,000
TOTAL: $ 8,500
* Memorial Day – July 4th and Veteran’s Day – Pearl Harbor Attachment 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 14, Packet Page 421

CRBA DRAFT PROJECTED WORKPLAN
2023/2024
Draft
HISTORICAL IDENTITY PLAN:

ITEM BUDGET
Whistle Maintenance
$ 1,500 –
per
contract
Murals - one
$15,500 -
estimate
Mural permit $ 300
Historic Signage (8)
Fish Signs (4)
Digitized Map/App*
$ 2,500
$ 1,200
$ 7,500
estimate
*we have printed
maps to take us
through August
TOTAL: $28,500
Attachment 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 15, Packet Page 422

CRBA DRAFT PROJECTED WORKPLAN
2023/2024
Draft
ADMINISTRATION/OVERHEAD:

ITEM BUDGET
Management Fee $ 47,500
Insurance $ 3,150
Supplies $ 50
Postage $ 100
Copies $ 200
Newsletter (1x) $ 450
Website $ 700
Accounting Fees $ 1,000
Tax Return $ 700
TOTAL: $ 53,850
Attachment 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 16, Packet Page 423

CRBA DRAFT PROJECTED WORKPLAN
2023/2024
Draft
NEW PROJECTS– PROPOSED IDEAS:

ITEM BUDGET
Restroom Design (NIP)
Unforeseen Projects
$10,000
$20,100
TOTAL: $30,100
Attachment 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 17, Packet Page 424 CRBA Annual Budget FY' 2023/24
(March 18, 2023)
Budget Estimate Budget
Estimated Income FY '22/23 FY '22/23 FY '23/24
- Bid $130,000 $159,493 $140,000
- Mry City Funds $0 $5,250 $0
Total Income $130,000 $164,743 $140,000
*Prior year carryover estimate $94,037 $126,756 $98,849 Total Available funds $224,037 $291,499 $238,849
Estimated Expenses (see Attached for Details)
- Streetscape
Equipment Maintenance: cans, newsracks, butt cans $11,210 $8,950 $7,300 - General Maintenance
Power Washing $21,000 $18,150 $21,000
Porter Service $55,000 $55,000 $55,000
- Banner Program $7,000 $5,700 $8,500
- Historical Identity/Walking Map/Whistle $20,565 $16,100 $28,500 - Administration $53,950 $54,500 $53,850
- New Projects $21,000 $0 $30,100
Total Expense $189,725 $158,400 $204,250
Net Income $34,312 $133,099 $34,599
Emergency Reserve $34,250 $34,250 $34,250
Operating Funds Less emergency Reserve $62 $98,849 $349 Current Bank Balance 03/18/2023 $162,404 assumes $126,756 6/30 Attachment 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 18, Packet Page 425 ATTACHMENT 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 19, Packet Page 426 Attachment 5 Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 20, Packet Page 427 2023 WORK PLAN & BUDGET
January -- December

MISSION STATEMENT
The North Fremont Business District of Monterey is a volunteer driven organization, with the mission of preserving, revitalizing, and promoting the
North Fremont Business District, through broad based community support and serving the needs of the local neighborhoods.

COMMITTEES
Streetscape
Infrastructure & Advocacy
Banner Program
Marketing
Special Events
Education
Holidays
Attachment 5
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 21, Packet Page 428 5/18/2023 2
Achievements
2004 District Formed
2005 Developed Monterey on Ice – at the fairgrounds, the first ice rink for the City of Monterey 2006 Second Annual Monterey on Ice – Largest ice rink for the City of Monterey 2006 Moved NFS undergrounding of utilities to 2nd position - in priority for the City behind Del Monte and in front of Foam Street
2009/2010 Traffic Study – Completed Traffic Study for NFS corridor 2010 NFS Streetscape Plan – Developed a comprehensive streetscape plan. 2013 Back Stage Pass – Online marketing program with 25+ coupons from NFS merchants for residents and visitors.
2014 Incorporation of Streetscape Plan into the City’s Specific Plan - Continued to advocate for the inclusion of the NFS Streetscape Plan without modifications into the City’s Specific Plan.

Advocated for all businesses, property owners, and neighborhoods along NFS to become involved in and informed about the development of the City’s Specific Plan for NFS and the implications and/or changes the Specific Plan will have on zoning of those parcels 2015 Developed the Mixed-Use Design Guidelines for NFS with the City for building design, building setbacks, and landscaping on individual properties along North Fremont Street- currently called the North Fremont Specific Plan.
2016 Inaugural Earth Day Clean-Up on North Fremont Street. Organized over 2 dozen volunteers and cleaned up sidewalks and parking areas along the entire District street frontage.

Inaugural “Festival of Trees” Holiday Event at Monterey Event Center, with over a dozen participating Charities.
2018 North Fremont Bike & Pedestrian Access & Safety Improvements. 6.8 Million Grant for North Fremont Street started construction. Supported and helped advocate for the grant for new ADA crosswalks at intersections and a Class IV median bike path in the median. 2019 North Fremont Bike & Pedestrian Access & Safety Improvements Completed. First Median Class IV bike lane installed on North Fremont Street, ADA crosswalks on 4 intersections, adaptive light signals along NFS installed, and storm drains fixed. 2021 North Fremont Business District of Monterey Banners Installed . First NFBDM banners,
prominently showing our district is in the City of Monterey and displaying our logo, were installed along North Fremont Street.

Attachment 5
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 22, Packet Page 429 5/18/2023 3
STREETSCAPE COMMITTEE BUDGET $5,000.00+TBD
Goal: to improve the visual appearance and ambience of the area through the use of streetscape improvements, curb appeal upgrades and other related projects and activities

1. Objective: Advocate for the reinstatement of the Façade Improvement Grant Program by the City to upgrade drive-by appearances.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Mary Alice Fettis
Due Date: On-going
Funds Needed:

2. Objective: Develop a Litter / Graffiti Removal Program – organize Earth Day for businesses to clean up property – provide drop box/recycling and help with graffiti removal on NFS Task Leader: Committee Chair: Kelly Violini
Due Date: April 19, 2023
Funds Needed: To be determined

3. Objective: North Fremont Street Streetscape Plan implementation – to incorporate drainage and undergrounding of utilities at same time. Advocate for the development of the Streetscape Plan by incorporating the undergrounding of utilities, adding street signage, development of sidewalks, providing adequate drainage, etc at the same time of development of that Plan. Development should be done in stages along NFS.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Leslie Svetich
Due Date: On-going – future – (storm drain repaired 2019) Funds Needed: TBD

4. Objective: North Fremont Street Streetscape Plan implementation – work with City to add landscaping to the median to enhance new bike path and bike racks with logos along NFS.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Leslie Svetich
Due Date: 2023
Funds Needed: $5,000.00 ( Add to Streetscape Reserve Account)

5. Objective: Add electricity to each pole along NFS. Work with City to add electricity to the poles in construction areas of bike path during 2019.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Leslie Svetich
Funds Needed: TBD – Ask City for Funding
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ADVOCACY COMMITTEE BUDGET $TBD
Goal: to improve the safety and accessibility of the North Fremont Street business corridor

1. Objective: Investigate speed reduction, and crosswalk improvements Task Leader: Committee Chair: Kelly Violini
Attachment 5
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 23, Packet Page 430 5/18/2023 4
Due Date: On-going
Funds Needed:

2. Objective: Advocate for extending the TROLLEY to NFS Task Leader: Committee Chair: Samir Patel
Due Date: On-going – foreseeable future
Funds Needed: Actual amount to be determined

3. Objective: Advocate for a comprehensive underground utilities plan to coincide with CTC award to include widening sidewalks and for City completion of drainage project (see streetscape plan)
Task Leader: Committee Chair: Mike Marotta/Leslie Svetich Due Date: On-going
Funds Needed:

4. Objective: Advocate for the individual property owners along North Fremont Street to fill their vacant properties and keep vacant properties in marketable order.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Board
Due Date: On-going
Funds Needed: Actual amount to be determined

5. Objective: Advocate for the City to improve the park at the corner of Canyon Del Rey and North Fremont Street as an entrance way into the City of Monterey and Laguna Grande corridor.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Board with CONA
Due Date: On-going
Funds Needed: Actual amount to be determined

6. Objective: Brand North Fremont Street’s new logo to identify our corridor as part of Monterey and work on a street name change to coincide with the name changes of Fremont, Del Monte, and Lighthouse.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Leslie Svetich/Mike Marotta Due Date: Logo finished 2016 - Ongoing
Funds Needed: see marketing budget

7. Objective: Advocate for the City to improve and define the Specific Plan more thoroughly with clear defined objectives for all new construction on NFS.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Board
Due Date: Ongoing
Funds Needed: To be determined

8. Objective: Advocate for the City to extend the bike path to Canyon Del Rey, through Seaside on Fremont Blvd, in addition to extending it to FORTAG.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Board/Leslie Svetich
Due Date: Ongoing
Funds Needed: To be determined
Attachment 5
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 24, Packet Page 431 5/18/2023 5
BANNER COMMITTEE BUDGET $500.00
Goal: to maintain our street banner program on North Fremont Street

1. Objective: Continued coordination of the established NFBDM banner program Task Leader: Committee Chair: Kelly Violini
Due Date: On-going calendar schedule
Funds Needed: Actual amount to be determined (Volunteer Board Member)

2. Objective: Banners have been designed and installed along North Fremont Street. Continue coordination of the banner program (event installations), repairs and maintenance, and monitor installation and tear down periods. Plus continued Coordination of Holiday Banners (under Holiday Committee).

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Leslie Svetich/Kelly Violini Due Date: Ongoing
Funds Needed: $500.00
MARKETING COMMITTEE BUDGET $31,500.00
Goal: to develop a unified marketing and networking program to establish North Fremont Street as a distinct shopping, dining and lodging area for local residents and visitors

1. Objective: Develop district promotional materials
Task Leader: Committee Chair: Wendy Brickman
Due Date: On-going in foreseeable future
Funds Needed: $2,000.00 + Revenue generating fundraiser

2. Objective: Continue to maintain a working relationship with Neighborhood Improvement Districts Task Leader: Board/Staff
Due Date: On-going
Funds Needed: To be determined

3. Objective: Create and develop a co-op advertising opportunity for NFBDM members, and use funds to develop an advertising campaign through co-op advertising and the use of marketing specialists to establish NFS business as part of Monterey. Distribute Back Stage Pass through out Monterey.

Task Leader: Committee Chair/Specialist: Mary Alice Cerrito Fettis/Wendy Brickman Due Date: On-going
Funds Needed: $23,000.00

4. Objective: Continue to develop, upgrade and maintain NFBDM website Task Leader: Committee Chair: Wendy Brickman
Due Date: On-going maintenance for current mobile website.

Attachment 5
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 25, Packet Page 432 5/18/2023 6
Funds Needed: $6,000.00

5. Objective: Encourage the Convention and Visitors Bureau to market NFS businesses, hotels/motels and vacant properties.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Wendy Brickman
Due Date: On-going maintenance for current mobile website.

Funds Needed: $500.00
SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE BUDGET $500.00
Goal: to create opportunities for interaction between district business owners, managers, staff and the residents among the three neighborhood associations

1. Objective: Sponsor a fund-raising event
Task Leader: Committee Chair: Kelly Violini
Due Date: May 2023
Funds Needed: $500.00
EDUCATION COMMITTEE BUDGET $500.00
Goal: to develop economic vitality within the North Fremont business community by providing educational opportunities to improve the business climate and practices

1. Objective: Coordinate and create an opportunity (annual) for interaction between district business owners, managers, staff, property owners, and to the residents among the three neighborhood associations
Task Leader: Committee Chair: Wendy Brickman
Due Date: May 2023
Funds Needed: $500.00
HOLIDAY COMMITTEE BUDGET $2,750.00
Goal: to encourage more business participation in decorating for major holidays to enliven the environment to draw residents and visitors to the area

1. Objective: Board member businesses to set an example for others on the street Task Leader: Individual businesses
Due Date: On appropriate holidays beyond Christmas/New Years such as the 4th of July Funds Needed: To be determined

2. Objective: Continued coordination of the Christmas holiday decorating contest with prizes for area businesses.

Task Leader: Committee Chair: Kelly Violini/Wendy Brickman Due Date: December 2023
Funds Needed: $750.00
Attachment 5
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 26, Packet Page 433 5/18/2023 7

3. Objective: Holiday Banners - Installation/Removal/Storage costs/Replace Banners Task Leader: Committee Chair: Kelly Violini/Leslie Svetich Funds Needed: $2,000.00

4. Objective: Lighted Wreaths along District – Request the City puts the 22 lighted wreaths we purchased, plus the 16 wreaths they used to put on our poles, up on all 19 poles along North Fremont Street
Task Leader: Committee Chair: Leslie Svetich
Funds Needed: NFBDM purchased 22 wreaths Oct 2017
Attachment 5
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 27, Packet Page 434 5/18/2023 8
2023 NFBDM BUDGET
BALANCE FORWARD $17,841.51
INCOME
City of Monterey Contribution $0
BID Assessment $18,000.00
Banner Administration Fee
Fund Raiser(s) $5,000.00
TOTAL INCOME $40,841.51

RESERVES
Savings/Reserves Streetscape Plan Implementation $93,712.16 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS $134,553.67

EXPENSES
Category: Appearance, Accessibility & Safety
Streetscape $5,000.00
Infrastructure & Advocacy $00
Category: Promotion
Banner Program $500.00
Marketing Committee

$26,500.00
Special Events Committee $500.00
Category: Economic Vitality
Education Committee $500.00
Holiday Committee $2,750.00
Category: General Administration
Administration $1,600.00
Supplies $300.00
Postage $100.00
Copying $50.00
Telephone/mobile $0.00

Licenses/Permits/Dues/Subscriptions
Insurance $1,200.00
Accounting/Professional Fees $1,200.00
TOTAL EXPENSES $40,200.00
Streetscape Savings/Reserves $93,712.16
Unallocated Reserves $641.50
Attachment 5
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 28, Packet Page 435 ATTACHMENT 5
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 29, Packet Page 436 Please Note: We believe the NMBA Work Plan allows for proactive and creative measures to address the economic recovery within its current structure. The Association has been, and continues to be, in close contact with our businesses within the District in-person, through our website (Lighthousedistrict.net), email connections and telephone conversations.

We are ready and eager to work with and support the City, as all of us continue the monumental task of economic recovery within our district and the entire city.

Kim Cole
Community Development Director
Monterey, CA 93940
April 6, 2023
Dear Kim:

The New Monterey Business Association requests that the City Council schedule a public hearing to authorize the continuance of our program for the next fiscal year and collect the business license assessment on our behalf, in accord with the requirements of Senate Bill 1424. Please note:
• The Oversight Committee made up of Christina Riddoch, Jose Miquel and Heather Jorgensen, met and approved the 2023 Work Plan, district boundaries and budget. • The New Monterey Business Association boundaries remain unchanged. • Improvements and activities for fiscal year 2023/24 are included in the attached comprehensive Work Plan • The 2023 budget (attached) outlines revenue and expenses as balanced utilizing $5,000 from reserve savings • The method of assessment remains 25% of the business license fee, with a $250 cap per individual business • Yearly expenditures and revenue are projected to balance As you can see from the attached material, we believe we have a well-balanced work plan that addresses district promotion.

Thank you for your continued leadership and support of the merchants and businesses in New Monterey during these very difficult times.

Sincerely,
Peter Cofresi, Administrator
New Monterey Business Association | 98 Del Monte Ave, Suite 201, Monterey, CA 93940 | (831) 655-8070 | [email protected] Attachment 6
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 30, Packet Page 437

NEW MONTEREY BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
2023

WORK PLAN

COMMITTEES
EXECUTIVE Page 2
PROMOTION Page 3

LAND USE, STREETSCAPE
AND TRANSPORTATION Page 5
Attachment 6
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 31, Packet Page 438 NMBA 2023

ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE
FINANCES ▲ POLICIES ▲ STAFF REVIEWS ▲ NOMINATIONS ▲ BYLAWS Mission: Oversees board and staff operations including bylaws, policies and finances.

Ensure Association is smooth running and represents its members and serves as liaison between the district, other business districts and the city and residents.

1. Objective Update Membership Directory to include contact names, fax numbers and email addresses. Include key neighborhood
resident contacts.

Task Leader NMBA Staff
Due Date Ongoing

2. Objective Establish Lighthouse District as a business and tourist destination by ensuring open communication between
Board, membership, neighborhood and the City
Task Leader NMBA Board
Due Date Ongoing

3. Objective Work with Hyperlinked Web Services to keep LighthouseDistrict.net current with news, upcoming events and business information within the New Monterey Business Association / Lighthouse District; use to promote the district to residents, visitors and current and prospective
businesses. Use the website to quickly disseminate
information in a timely, proactive method.

Task Leader NMBA Board
Due Date Ongoing

4. Objective Continue to encourage use of “Lighthouse District” in promotional materials.

Task Leader NMBA Staff
Due Date Ongoing

5. Objective: Continue to develop the New Monterey Business Association Liaison with the New Monterey Neighborhood
Association to address common concerns.

Task Leader: Association President / NMBA Staff
Due Date: Ongoing
Page | 2
Attachment 6
Council Regular Meeting, 6/6/2023, Item No. 7., Item Page 32, Packet Page 439 NMBA 2023

6. Objective: Evaluate progress of Work Plan – Report to full Board Task Leader: Executive Committee / Staff
Due Date: October 2023

7. Objective: Survey NMBA Membership to evaluate how the Association is representing the needs of the members. Use personal
visits / the website and the Newsletter to communicate with members.

Task Leader: Association Vice President
Due Date: Ongoing

8. Objective: Offer Associate membership to businesses located outside of the BID, but within the Associate Membership boundaries as defined in the NMBA Associate Membership Policy
eligibility statement.

Task Leader: Association President / Staff
Due Date: Ongoing
------------

PROMOTION COMMITTEE
MARKETING ▲ EVENTS ▲ TRANSPORTATION
MISSION: To promote the Lighthouse District as a destination for shopping, dining and services to both residents and visitors.

1. Objective: Continue and expand efforts to make the Lighthouse District a destination commercial district. Expand efforts to define the district as resident serving, while also encouraging greater visitor patronage throughout the district.