Monterey City Council
December 15, 2023

make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations. (Pub.

Resources Code, section 21003, subd. (e).) Accordingly, please report any special-status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). The CNDDB field survey form can be found at the following link:
https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submitting-Data. The completed form can be mailed electronically to CNDDB at the following email address:

[email protected]. The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found at the following link: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plantsand-Animals. FILING FEES The Project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the fee is required in order for the underlying Project approval to be operative, vested, and final. (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, section 753.5; Fish & G. Code, section 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, section 21089.)

CONCLUSION
CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the DEIR to assist the City of Monterey Community Development Department in identifying and mitigating Project impacts on biological resources.

Questions regarding this letter or further coordination should be directed to Evelyn Barajas-Perez, Environmental Scientist, at (805) 503-5738 or [email protected]. Sincerely,
Julie A. Vance
Regional Manager
ec: State Clearinghouse
Governor’s office of Planning and Research
[email protected]













 

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 323, Packet Page 326 Letter 2
COMMENTER: Julie A. Vance, California Department of Fish and Wildlife DATE: August 25, 2023
Response 2-1
This comment is introductory and does not contain a substantive comment on the Draft EIR. Further, the commenter states that the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has determined that the mitigation measures included in the Draft EIR are sufficient for mitigation of impacts to biological resources. This comment is noted and will be provided to the decision-makers for their consideration. No further response is required.

Response 2-2
This comment requests that special status species and natural communities detected during project surveys be submitted to the California Natural Diversity Database. As discussed in Section 4.6.4, Biological Resources, of the Draft EIR, the project site is entirely developed and includes existing structures and parking areas. Vegetation on site is limited to a few ornamental plantings. The project site has no natural or native vegetation communities that could support special-status wildlife and is surrounded with urban residential and commercial development. Due to lack of habitat, the project site is not considered viable to support any federally or State listed species or other special-status wildlife. Special-status birds and bats may occur rarely or occasionally when foraging but are not expected to roost or nest at the project site. Due to the developed nature of the project site, biological surveys were not conducted and therefore no submittal to the California Natural Diversity Database is required.

Response 2-3
This comment states that payment of CDFW fees is required. If the project is approved, the City will pay the required CDFW fees at the time the Notice of Determination for the Final EIR is filed with the Monterey County Clerk.

Response 2-4
The comment provides a conclusion to the letter and includes contact information and does not contain a substantive comment on the Draft EIR. No further response is required.

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 324, Packet Page 327 8 References

8.1 Bibliography
Environmental Setting
Monterey, City of. 2022. Development Projects.
https://monterey.org/city_hall/community_development/planning/development_projects/i ndex.php (accessed August 2022).

Cultural Resources
Bradley, W.C. and W.O. Addicott. 1968. Age of first marine terrace near Santa Cruz, California.

Geological Society of America Bulletin. Volume 79, pp. 1203-1210.

California Geological Survey. 2002. Note 36 – California Geomorphic Provinces. https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/Documents/CGS-Note-36.pdf (accessed July 2022).

Clark, J.C., W.R. Dupré, and L.I. Rosenberg. 1997. Geologic map of the Monterey and Seaside 7.5- minute quadrangles, Monterey County, California: a digital database. [map.] United States Geological Survey, Open-File Report 97-30, scale 1:24,000.

Jefferson, G.T. 2010. A catalogue of late Quaternary vertebrates from California. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Technical Report. Volume 7, pp. 5-172.

Paleobiology Database (PBDB). 2022. The Paleobiology Database, http://paleobiodb.org/ (accessed July 2022).

Powell, C.L., L.B. Grant, and S.W. Conkling. 2004. Paleoecologic analysis and age of a late Pleistocene fossil assemblage at a locality in Newport Beach, upper Newport Bay, Orange County, California. The Veliger. Volume 47, pp. 171-180.

Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP). 2010. Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Impact Mitigation Guidelines Revision Committee. https://vertpaleo.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/01/SVP_Impact_Mitigation_Guidelines-1.pdf. (accessed July 2022).

University of California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP). 2022. UCMP online database specimen search portal, http://ucmpdb.berkeley.edu/ (accessed July 2022).

Wright, R.H. 1972. Late Pleistocene marine fauna, Goleta, California. Journal of Paleontology.

Volume 46, pp. 688-695.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2022. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List.
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search.asp?cmd=search&reporttype=CORTESE& site_type=CSITES,OPEN,FUDS,CLOSE&status=ACT,BKLG,COM&reporttitle=HAZARDOUS+WA STE+AND+SUBSTANCES+SITE+LIST (accessed August 2022).

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 325, Packet Page 328 California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA). 2022a. Sites Identified with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels Outside the Waste Management Unit. https://calepa.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2016/10/SiteCleanup-CorteseListCurrentList.pdf (accessed August 2022). _____. 2022b. List of “active” CDO and CAO. https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/section65962-5c/ (accessed August 2022).

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 2022. Types of Operations. https://www.faa.gov/hazmat/air_carriers/operations (accessed August 2022).

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2022. National Incident Management System. https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/nims (accessed July 2022).

Monterey, County of. 2019. Monterey Regional Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. https://www.co.monterey.ca.us/home/showpublisheddocument/75251/636875603145330 000 (accessed July 2022).
______. 2022. Airport Land Use Commission.
https://www.co.monterey.ca.us/government/departments-a-h/housing-communitydevelopment/planning-services/committees-hearings-agendas/airport-land-usecommission#:~:text=The%20primary%20purpose%20of%20the,(County%20or%20incorpora ted%20city) (accessed August 2022).

Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD). 2022. Compliance Assistance for the Asbestos NESHAP. https://www.mbard.org/files/5dfa66b11/complianceassistance2018.pdf (accessed August 2022).

Monterey Regional Airport. 2022. About Monterey Regional Airport. https://www.montereyairport.com/about-mry (accessed August 2022).

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2022a. About OSHA. https://www.osha.gov/aboutosha (accessed July 2022).
______. 2022b. Process Safety Management. https://www.osha.gov/process-safety-management (accessed July 2022).
______. 2022c. Transporting Hazardous Materials. https://www.osha.gov/truckingindustry/transporting-hazardous-materials (accessed July 2022).

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2022. GeoTracker database. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/search?CMD=search&case_number=&business_na me=&main_street_name=&city=&zip=&county=&SITE_TYPE=LUFT&oilfield=&STATUS=&BR ANCH=&MASTER_BASE=&Search=Search (accessed August 2022).

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2022a. Learn About Asbestos. https://www.epa.gov/asbestos/learn-about-asbestos (accessed August 2022). ______. 2022b. EPA Actions to Protect the Public from Asbestos. https://www.epa.gov/asbestos/epa-actions-protect-public-exposure-asbestos (accessed August 2022).
______. 2022c. Learn About Lead. https://www.epa.gov/lead/learn-about-lead (accessed August 2022).

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 326, Packet Page 329 ______. 2022d. Protect Your Family from Sources of Lead. https://www.epa.gov/lead/protect-yourfamily-sources-lead (accessed August 2022). ______. 2022e. How People are Exposed to Mercury. https://www.epa.gov/mercury/how-peopleare-exposed-mercury#metallicmercury (accessed August 2022). ______. 2022f. PCBs in Caulk and Residential Demolition. https://www.epa.gov/large-scaleresidential-demolition/pcbs-caulk-and-residentialdemolition#:~:text=Caulk%20containing%20potentially%20harmful%20polychlorinated,foun d%20in%20single%2Dfamily%20homes. (accessed August 2022). ______. 2022g. Chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). https://www.epa.gov/chemicals-under-tsca (accessed July 2022). ______. 2022h. Summary of the Toxic Substances Control Act. https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/summary-toxic-substances-control-act (accessed July 2022). ______. 2022i. Summary of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-resource-conservation-and-recovery-act (accessed July 2022).
______. 2022j. Superfund: CERCLA Overview. https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-cerclaoverview (accessed July 2022).

Land Use and Planning
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2017. A Guide to Bikeway Classification. http://lvbikecoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/caltrans-d4-bike-plan_bikewayclassification-brochure_072517.pdf (accessed August 2022).

Monterey, City of. 2005. City of Monterey General Plan. https://files.monterey.org/Document%20Center/CommDev/Planning/GeneralPlan/19_0604-General-Plan.pdf (accessed April 2023).

Noise
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2013. Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. (CT-HWANP-RT-13-069.25.2) September. Available at:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/pub/TeNS_Sept_2013B.pdf (accessed April 2023). ______. 2020. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. Available at:
https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/environmentalanalysis/documents/env/tcvgm-apr2020-a11y.pdf (accessed April 2023).

Crocker, Malcolm J. (Editor). 2007. Handbook of Noise and Vibration Control Book, ISBN: 978-0-471- 39599-7, Wiley-VCH, October.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 2020. 1050.1F Desk Reference.

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2011. Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and Guidance. (FHWA-HEP-10-025). December.

Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment.

November. Available at: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/researchinnovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no0123_0.pdf (accessed April 2023).

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 327, Packet Page 330 Kinsler, Lawrence E. and R. Frey, Austin and B. Coppens, Alan and V. Sanders, James. Fundamentals of Acoustics, 4th Edition. ISBN 0-471-84789-5. Wiley-VCH, December 1999.

Monterey, City of. 2005. City of Monterey General Plan. https://files.monterey.org/Document%20Center/CommDev/Planning/GeneralPlan/19_0604-General-Plan.pdf (accessed April 2023).

Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission. 2019. Monterey Regional Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.
https://www.co.monterey.ca.us/home/showpublisheddocument/75251/636875603145330 000 (accessed April 2023).

TJKM. 2023. Traffic Analysis for Proposed Hotel Development Located at 2101 N. Fremont Street in the City of Monterey, CA.

Salter, Inc. 2021. Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street Environmental Noise Study. ______. 2023. Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street Environmental Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment.

Effects Found Not to be Significant
Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG). 2020. Final 2022 Regional Growth Forecast. https://www.ambag.org/sites/default/files/2020- 12/Final%20Draft%202022%20Regional%20Growth%20Forecast_PDF_A.pdf (accessed July 2022).
______. 2022. Final 6th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation Plan 2023-2031. https://www.ambag.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/PDFA_AMBAG%20RHNA%202023- 2031_Final%20Plan_091522V4.pdf (accessed April 2023).

California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2021. User's Guide for CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0. http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide (accessed July 2022). ______. 2016. Ambient Air Quality Standards. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf (accessed August 2022).

California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2022. 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-04/2022-sp.pdf (accessed May 2023).

California-American Water Company (CalAM). 2021. Urban Water Management Plan. https://www.amwater.com/caaw/resources/PDF/Customer-Service-Billing/RatesTariffs/GRC-Applications/Monterey_UWMP.pdf (accessed September 2023).

California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2016a. California Important Farmland Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ (accessed July 2022). ______. 2016b. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land. https://planning.lacity.org/eir/HollywoodCenter/Deir/ELDP/(E)%20Initial%20Study/Initial%2 0Study/Attachment%20B%20References/California%20Department%20of%20Conservation %20Williamson%20Map%202016.pdf (accessed July 2022).
______. 2018. California Geological Survey Information Warehouse: Mineral Land Classification. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/index.html?map=mlc (accessed July 2022).

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 328, Packet Page 331 ______. 2019. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/ (accessed July 2022). ______. 2020. Landslide Inventory. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/lsi/ (accessed July 2022). ______. 2021. Tsunami Hazard Area Map.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/ts_evacuation/?extent=- 13676723.058%2C4319312.7307%2C13441908.5072%2C4423572.8373%2C102100&utm_source=cgs+active&utm_content=mon terey (accessed August 2022).

California Department of Finance (DOF). 2022. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State. https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/ (accessed July 2022).

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2022a. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) - Rarefind 5. https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data (accessed July 2022).
______. 2022b. Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS). Version 5.92.26.

Available at http://bios.dfg.ca.gov (accessed July 2022).

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2007. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ (accessed July 2022).

California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2022a. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2642?siteID=1976 (accessed July 2022).
______. 2022b. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/BusinessGroupRates (accessed July 2022).

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2022. State Scenic Highways. https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e 8057116f1aacaa (accessed July 2022).

California Native Plant Society (CNPS). Rare Plant Program. 2022. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v9-01 1.5). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. http://www.rareplants.cnps.org (accessed January 2022).

Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coast Basin.
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralcoast/publications_forms/publications/basin_plan / (accessed August 2022).

CGS Consultants. 2023. Letter of Transmittal, to the City of Monterey, Attention: Fire Department, dated February 3, 2023.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2021. FEMA’s National Flood Hazard Layer Viewer. https://hazardsfema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8b0adb51996444d4879338b552 9aa9cd&extent=-121.94529102661183,36.5159779735144,-
121.90374897338809,36.53322138877889 (accessed July 2022).

Google Earth Pro. 2022. Version 7.3.4.8642 (64-bit). https://earth.google.com (accessed July 2022).

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 329, Packet Page 332 Monterey, City of. 2011. General Plan of the City of Monterey Map 3: Showing Land Use. https://files.monterey.org/Document%20Center/CommDev/Planning/General-Plan/3-LandUse.pdf (accessed July 2022). ______. 2016a. City of Monterey Climate Action Plan.
https://files.monterey.org/Document%20Center/CommDev/Sustainability/Climate_Action_ Plan.pdf (accessed July 2022).
______. 2016b. Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
https://files.monterey.org/Document%20Center/CommDev/Planning/Parks%20&%20Recre ation%20Master%20Plan/16_1027-Final-PRMP.pdf (accessed July 2022). ______. 2019. City of Monterey General Plan.
https://files.monterey.org/Document%20Center/CommDev/Planning/GeneralPlan/19_0604-General-Plan.pdf (accessed July 2022). ______. 2021a. Move Monterey: Multimodal Plan for the City of Monterey. https://files.monterey.org/Document%20Center/CommDev/Planning/MultiModel%20Transportation/_MultimodalPlan2021update-FinalAdopted.pdf (accessed July 2022).
______. 2021b. Resolution No. 21-027 C.S., City of Monterey Vehicle Miles Traveled Policy. https://files.monterey.org/Document%20Center/CommDev/Planning/VMT/Reso-21-027- VMT-Policy.pdf (accessed July 2022).
______. 2021c. 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Redevelopment Water Allocation Memorandum. ______. 2021d. Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Redevelopment.
______. 2022a. City of Monterey Zoning Map.
http://gisags8.ci.monterey.ca.us/pub/shared/pdf/zoning_map.pdf (accessed July 2022). ______. 2022b. Transient Occupancy Tax Reports.
https://monterey.org/city_hall/finance/fiscal_transparency/other_financial_reports.php#ou ter-494sub-2269 (accessed July 2022).

Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD). 2008. CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. https://www.mbard.org/files/0ce48fe68/CEQA+Guidelines.pdf (accessed July 2022). ______. 2017. 2012-2015 Air Quality Management Plan. Adopted March 15, 2017. https://www.mbard.org/files/6632732f5/2012-2015 AQMP_FINAL.pdf (accessed July 2022).

Monterey One Water. 2022. Regional Treatment Plant.
https://montereyonewater.org/280/Regional-Treatment-Plant (accessed July 2022).

ReGen. 2016. 2016 Annual Report. https://regenmonterey.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/11/mrwmd-annual-report-2016-final.pdf (accessed July 2022). ______. 2022. Monterey Peninsula Landfill. https://regenmonterey.org/monterey-peninsulalandfill/ (accessed July 2022).

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2022. What is a seiche? https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/seiche.html (accessed August 2022).

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 330, Packet Page 333 United States Geological Survey. 2022a. What is surface faulting or surface rupture in an earthquake? https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-surface-faulting-or-surface-ruptureearthquake (accessed July 2022). ______. 2022b. What is liquefaction? https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/whatliquefaction#:~:text=Liquefaction%20takes%20place%20when%20loosely,cause%20major% 20damage%20during%20earthquakes. (accessed July 2022).
______. 2022c. Land Subsidence. https://www.usgs.gov/mission-areas/waterresources/science/land-subsidence#:~:text=collapse%2C%20or%20subsidence.- ,Land%20subsidence%20is%20a%20gradual%20settling%20or%20sudden%20sinking%20of, %2C%20sinkholes%2C%20and%20thawing%20permafrost. (accessed August 2022).

Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (SVBGSA). 2022. Groundwater Sustainability Plan – Monterey Subbasin. https://svbgsa.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/04/Completed_Monterey-Subbasin-GSP_Chap-ES10_wo_Appendices.pdf (accessed August 2022).

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2022. Patient Exposure and the Air Quality Index. https://www.epa.gov/pmcourse/patient-exposure-and-air-quality-index (accessed August 2022).

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022a. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC). https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/ (accessed July 2022). ______. 2022b. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Version 2. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html (accessed July 2022).

United States Green Building Council. 2008. New Construction Default Occupancy Counts. https://www.usgbc.org/credits/new-construction-existing-buildings-commercial-interiorscore-and-shell-schools-new-constr-3 (accessed July 2022).

WeatherSpark. 2022. Climate and Average Year Round Weather in Monterey. https://weatherspark.com/y/1042/Average-Weather-in-Monterey-California-United-StatesYearRound#:~:text=The%20predominant%20average%20hourly%20wind,of%2073%25%20on%2 0July%2029. (accessed July 2022).

Other CEQA Required Discussions
California Department of Finance (DOF). 2022. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State. https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/ (accessed July 2022).

Alternatives
Loopnet. 2022. Commercial Real Estate for Sale in the City of Monterey, CA. www.loopnet.com (accessed July 2022).

Response to Comments
California-American Water Company (CalAM). 2021. Urban Water Management Plan. https://www.amwater.com/caaw/resources/PDF/Customer-Service-Billing/RatesTariffs/GRC-Applications/Monterey_UWMP.pdf (accessed September 2023).

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 331, Packet Page 334 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2020. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/transportation-planning/documents/sb-743/2020-09-10-1st-edition-tacfnl-a11y.pdf (accessed September 2023).

California Office of Planning and Research (OPR). 2018. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. https://opr.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/20190122- 743_Technical_Advisory.pdf (accessed September 2023).

8.2 List of Preparers
This EIR was prepared by the City of Monterey, with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc.

Consultant staff involved in the preparation of the EIR are listed below.

RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC.

Megan Jones, Principal-in-Charge
Nicole West, Supervising Environmental Planner, Project Manager Shelby Cramton, Environmental Planner, Assistant Project Manager Kayleigh Limbach, Environmental Planner
Josh Carman, Noise Director
Hayley Rundle, Noise Specialist
JulieAnn Murphy, Architectural Historian
Jesse Voremberg, Environmental Planner
Samantha Kehr, Biologist
Andrew McGrath, Paleontologist
Aubrey Mescher, Water Supply Specialist
Yaritza Ramirez, Publishing Specialist

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 332, Packet Page 335 Appendix $
Notice of Preparation and Comment Letters

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 333, Packet Page 336 Notice of Preparation
Notice of Preparation
To: From:
(Address) (Address)
Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBZLOO EHWKH/HDG$JHQF\ DQGZLOO SUHSDUHDQHQYLURQPHQWDO LPSDFWUHSRUWIRUWKHSURMHFWLGHQWLILHGEHORZ:HQHHGWRNQRZWKHYLHZVRI\RXUDJHQF\DVWRWKHVFRSHDQG FRQWHQWRIWKHHQYLURQPHQWDOLQIRUPDWLRQZKLFKLVJHUPDQHWR\RXUDJHQF\ VVWDWXWRU\UHVSRQVLELOLWLHVLQ
FRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFW<RXUDJHQF\ZLOOQHHGWRXVHWKH(,5SUHSDUHGE\RXUDJHQF\ZKHQ FRQVLGHULQJ\RXUSHUPLWRURWKHUDSSURYDOIRUWKHSURMHFW 7KHSURMHFWGHVFULSWLRQORFDWLRQDQGWKHSRWHQWLDOHQYLURQPHQWDOHIIHFWVDUHFRQWDLQHGLQWKHDWWDFKHG PDWHULDOV$FRS\RIWKH,QLWLDO6WXG\
 LV LVQRW
DWWDFKHG
'XHWRWKHWLPHOLPLWVPDQGDWHGE\6WDWHODZ\RXUUHVSRQVHPXVWEHVHQWDWWKHHDUOLHVWSRVVLEOHGDWHEXWQRWODWHU WKDQGD\VDIWHUUHFHLSWRIWKLVQRWLFH
3OHDVH VHQG \RXU UHVSRQVHWR BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB DWWKH DGGUHVV VKRZQDERYH:HZLOOQHHGWKHQDPHIRUDFRQWDFWSHUVRQLQ\RXUDJHQF\ 3URMHFW7LWOH

3URMHFW$SSOLFDQWLIDQ\

Date Signature
Title
Telephone
Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 14, (CEQA Guidelines) Sections 15082(a), 15103, 15375. x
June 2, 2022
Senior Associate Planner
(831) 646-3910
Exhibit A
Responsible Agencies,
Trustee Agencies, and
City of Monterey
570 Pacific Street
Interested Parties Monterey, CA 93940
City of Monterey Community Development Department
Christopher Schmidt
2101 North Fremont Hotel Project
Lakshmi Hotel Partners

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 334, Packet Page 337 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project Description
1 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project Description
Lead Agency Contact Project Applicant
Christopher Schmidt Lakshmi Hotel Partners
City of Monterey 2113 North Fremont
Community Development Department Monterey, CA 93490
570 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
[email protected]
(831) 646-3910
Project Location
The 0.58-acre project site is located at 2101 North Fremont Street in the City of Monterey, California. The project site is located on the northeast corner of North Fremont Street and Casa Verde Way. The project site is located within the North Fremont Specific Plan area and is zoned as Visitor Accommodation Facility (VAF). Surrounding uses include residential uses to the northeast, north, and northwest, and hotel and commercial uses to the east, south, and west. Figure 1 shows the regional location of the project site, while Figure 2 shows the project site and surrounding land uses.

Project Description
The project includes demolition of an existing one-story, 18-guest room hotel and 134-seat restaurant and the construction of a new four-story, 42 guest room branded hotel. The project requires approval of a conditional use permit, architectural review permit, and building permit from the City of Monterey and a water permit from the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District.

The project requires a text amendment to the North Fremont Specific Plan clarifying that: (a) for VAF zoned properties, the VAF zone requirements apply as required by City Charter; and (b) the Specific Plan is consistent with, but not part of the General Plan. The project also includes an amendment to the City’s off-street parking standards and loading zone requirement, and readoption of the parking calculation in Section 38-36(A) of the City Municipal Code.

Project History
An Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) was prepared for the proposed project and was circulated for public review between March 17 and April 16, 2021. Comments received on the project were primarily related to building design (style, height, and massing), parking, noise, and water supply. The IS-MND was approved by the Planning Commission on October 12, 2021, following which an appeal was filed by an adjacent property owner. As a result of the public controversy, the City determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 335, Packet Page 338 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project Description
2 Potential Environmental Effects
Based on the analysis in the IS-MND and issues raised by the public, the City determined that the EIR will analyze in detail potentially significant impacts related to cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, land use, noise, and tribal cultural resources.

In addition, the EIR will include a discussion of environmental topics found to have no impact or found not to be significant, including aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, air quality, biological resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation, utilities and service systems, and wildfire. The EIR will also include a discussion of other topics required by CEQA, including cumulative impacts, project alternatives, growth-inducing effects, and significant irreversible effects.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 336, Packet Page 339 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project Description
3 Figure 1 Regional Project Location

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 337, Packet Page 340 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project Description
4 Figure 2 Project Site and Surrounding Land Uses

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 338, Packet Page 341 KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan Indians of the Big Sur Rancheria PO Box 8355 Woodland, California 95776 p) 530-723-2380
July 20, 2022
Chris Schmidt
Senior Associate Planner
City of Monterey
570 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
RE: 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project
Dear Mr. Chris Schmidt,
Thank you for your project notification email/ letter dated June 24, 2022, regarding the proposed project site located at 2101 North Fremont Street, Monterey, CA. We appreciate your effort to contact us and wish to respond.

The Cultural Specialist has reviewed the project and concluded that it is within the aboriginal territories of the KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan Indians of the Big Sur Rancheria. Therefore, we have a cultural interest and authority in the proposed project area.

Based on the information provided, the Tribe has concerns that the project could impact previously unknown cultural resources. Please send us a copy of the draft environmental impact report for this project. The Tribe also recommends cultural sensitivity training for any pre-project personnel. We may also recommend including a cultural monitor during development and ground disturbance, including backhoe trenching and excavations throughout all phases of the project. In addition, we request that you incorporate KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan Indians of the Big Sur Rancheria’s Treatment Protocol into the measures for this project.

Should you have any questions, please contact the following individuals:

Isaac Bojorquez Lydia Bojorquez
Chairman Vice-Chairperson
Cell: (530) 723-2380 Cell: (530) 650-5943
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Please refer to identification number KKTR–06242022-01 in any correspondence concerning this project.

Thank you for providing us the opportunity to comment.

Shurruru,
Tribal Chairman
KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan
Indians of the Big Sur Rancheria
T ib l Ch i

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 339, Packet Page 342 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

June 24, 2022
Chris Schmidt
City of Monterey
570 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
Re: 2022060567, 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project, Monterey County Dear Mr. Schmidt:

The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) has received the Notice of Preparation (NOP), Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) or Early Consultation for the project referenced above. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code §21000 et seq.), specifically Public Resources Code §21084.1, states that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. (Pub. Resources Code § 21084.1; Cal. Code Regs., tit.14, §15064.5 (b) (CEQA Guidelines §15064.5 (b)). If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before a lead agency, that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) shall be prepared. (Pub. Resources Code §21080 (d); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 5064 subd.(a)(1) (CEQA Guidelines §15064 (a)(1)).

In order to determine whether a project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, a lead agency will need to determine whether there are historical resources within the area of potential effect (APE).

CEQA was amended significantly in 2014. Assembly Bill 52 (Gatto, Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014) (AB 52) amended CEQA to create a separate category of cultural resources, “tribal cultural resources” (Pub. Resources Code §21074) and provides that a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. (Pub. Resources Code §21084.2). Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource. (Pub. Resources Code §21084.3 (a)). AB 52 applies to any project for which a notice of preparation, a notice of negative declaration, or a mitigated negative declaration is filed on or after July 1, 2015. If your project involves the adoption of or amendment to a general plan or a specific plan, or the designation or proposed designation of open space, on or after March 1, 2005, it may also be subject to Senate Bill 18 (Burton, Chapter 905, Statutes of 2004) (SB 18).

Both SB 18 and AB 52 have tribal consultation requirements. If your project is also subject to the federal National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.) (NEPA), the tribal consultation requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (154 U.S.C. 300101, 36 C.F.R. §800 et seq.) may also apply.

The NAHC recommends consultation with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of your proposed project as early as possible in order to avoid inadvertent discoveries of Native American human remains and best protect tribal cultural resources. Below is a brief summary of portions of AB 52 and SB 18 as well as the NAHC’s recommendations for conducting cultural resources assessments.

Consult your legal counsel about compliance with AB 52 and SB 18 as well as compliance with any other applicable laws.

S
J
C
C

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Raymond C.

Hitchcock
Miwok/Nisenan

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov
Exhibit A
Governor’s Office of Planning & Research
Jun 27 2022

STATE CLEARINGHOUSE

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 340, Packet Page 343

AB 52

AB 52 has added to CEQA the additional requirements listed below, along with many other requirements:

1. Fourteen Day Period to Provide Notice of Completion of an Application/Decision to Undertake a Project:

Within fourteen (14) days of determining that an application for a project is complete or of a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, a lead agency shall provide formal notification to a designated contact of, or tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, to be accomplished by at least one written notice that includes:
a. A brief description of the project.
b. The lead agency contact information.
c. Notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation. (Pub.

Resources Code §21080.3.1 (d)).
d. A “California Native American tribe” is defined as a Native American tribe located in California that is on the contact list maintained by the NAHC for the purposes of Chapter 905 of Statutes of 2004 (SB 18). (Pub. Resources Code §21073).

2. Begin Consultation Within 30 Days of Receiving a Tribe’s Request for Consultation and Before Releasing a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Environmental Impact Report: A lead agency shall begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving a request for consultation from a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.1, subds. (d) and (e)) and prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration or Environmental Impact Report. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.1(b)). a. For purposes of AB 52, “consultation shall have the same meaning as provided in Gov. Code §65352.4 (SB 18). (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.1 (b)).

3. Mandatory Topics of Consultation If Requested by a Tribe: The following topics of consultation, if a tribe requests to discuss them, are mandatory topics of consultation:
a. Alternatives to the project.
b. Recommended mitigation measures.
c. Significant effects. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.2 (a)).

4. Discretionary Topics of Consultation: The following topics are discretionary topics of consultation:
a. Type of environmental review necessary.
b. Significance of the tribal cultural resources.
c. Significance of the project’s impacts on tribal cultural resources. d. If necessary, project alternatives or appropriate measures for preservation or mitigation that the tribe may recommend to the lead agency. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.2 (a)).

5. Confidentiality of Information Submitted by a Tribe During the Environmental Review Process: With some exceptions, any information, including but not limited to, the location, description, and use of tribal cultural resources submitted by a California Native American tribe during the environmental review process shall not be included in the environmental document or otherwise disclosed by the lead agency or any other public agency to the public, consistent with Government Code §6254 (r) and §6254.10. Any information submitted by a California Native American tribe during the consultation or environmental review process shall be published in a confidential appendix to the environmental document unless the tribe that provided the information consents, in writing, to the disclosure of some or all of the information to the public. (Pub. Resources Code §21082.3 (c)(1)).

6. Discussion of Impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources in the Environmental Document: If a project may have a significant impact on a tribal cultural resource, the lead agency’s environmental document shall discuss both of the following:
a. Whether the proposed project has a significant impact on an identified tribal cultural resource. b. Whether feasible alternatives or mitigation measures, including those measures that may be agreed to pursuant to Public Resources Code §21082.3, subdivision (a), avoid or substantially lessen the impact on the identified tribal cultural resource. (Pub. Resources Code §21082.3 (b)).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 341, Packet Page 344

7. Conclusion of Consultation: Consultation with a tribe shall be considered concluded when either of the following occurs:
a. The parties agree to measures to mitigate or avoid a significant effect, if a significant effect exists, on a tribal cultural resource; or
b. A party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.2 (b)).

8. Recommending Mitigation Measures Agreed Upon in Consultation in the Environmental Document: Any mitigation measures agreed upon in the consultation conducted pursuant to Public Resources Code §21080.3.2 shall be recommended for inclusion in the environmental document and in an adopted mitigation monitoring and reporting program, if determined to avoid or lessen the impact pursuant to Public Resources Code §21082.3, subdivision (b), paragraph 2, and shall be fully enforceable. (Pub. Resources Code §21082.3 (a)).

9. Required Consideration of Feasible Mitigation: If mitigation measures recommended by the staff of the lead agency as a result of the consultation process are not included in the environmental document or if there are no agreed upon mitigation measures at the conclusion of consultation, or if consultation does not occur, and if substantial evidence demonstrates that a project will cause a significant effect to a tribal cultural resource, the lead agency shall consider feasible mitigation pursuant to Public Resources Code §21084.3 (b). (Pub. Resources Code §21082.3 (e)).

10. Examples of Mitigation Measures That, If Feasible, May Be Considered to Avoid or Minimize Significant Adverse Impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources:
a. Avoidance and preservation of the resources in place, including, but not limited to:
i. Planning and construction to avoid the resources and protect the cultural and natural context.
ii. Planning greenspace, parks, or other open space, to incorporate the resources with culturally appropriate protection and management criteria.
b. Treating the resource with culturally appropriate dignity, taking into account the tribal cultural values and meaning of the resource, including, but not limited to, the following:
i. Protecting the cultural character and integrity of the resource. ii. Protecting the traditional use of the resource.
iii. Protecting the confidentiality of the resource.
c. Permanent conservation easements or other interests in real property, with culturally appropriate management criteria for the purposes of preserving or utilizing the resources or places. d. Protecting the resource. (Pub. Resource Code §21084.3 (b)). e. Please note that a federally recognized California Native American tribe or a non-federally recognized California Native American tribe that is on the contact list maintained by the NAHC to protect a California prehistoric, archaeological, cultural, spiritual, or ceremonial place may acquire and hold conservation easements if the conservation easement is voluntarily conveyed. (Civ. Code §815.3 (c)). f. Please note that it is the policy of the state that Native American remains and associated grave artifacts shall be repatriated. (Pub. Resources Code §5097.991).

11. Prerequisites for Certifying an Environmental Impact Report or Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration or Negative Declaration with a Significant Impact on an Identified Tribal Cultural Resource: An Environmental Impact Report may not be certified, nor may a mitigated negative declaration or a negative declaration be adopted unless one of the following occurs:
a. The consultation process between the tribes and the lead agency has occurred as provided in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1 and §21080.3.2 and concluded pursuant to Public Resources Code §21080.3.2.
b. The tribe that requested consultation failed to provide comments to the lead agency or otherwise failed to engage in the consultation process.
c. The lead agency provided notice of the project to the tribe in compliance with Public Resources Code §21080.3.1 (d) and the tribe failed to request consultation within 30 days. (Pub. Resources Code §21082.3 (d)).

The NAHC’s PowerPoint presentation titled, “Tribal Consultation Under AB 52: Requirements and Best Practices” may be found online at: http://nahc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/AB52TribalConsultation_CalEPAPDF.pdf

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 342, Packet Page 345

SB 18

SB 18 applies to local governments and requires local governments to contact, provide notice to, refer plans to, and consult with tribes prior to the adoption or amendment of a general plan or a specific plan, or the designation of open space. (Gov. Code §65352.3). Local governments should consult the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research’s “Tribal Consultation Guidelines,” which can be found online at:
https://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/09_14_05_Updated_Guidelines_922.pdf.

Some of SB 18’s provisions include:

1. Tribal Consultation: If a local government considers a proposal to adopt or amend a general plan or a specific plan, or to designate open space it is required to contact the appropriate tribes identified by the NAHC by requesting a “Tribal Consultation List.” If a tribe, once contacted, requests consultation the local government must consult with the tribe on the plan proposal. A tribe has 90 days from the date of receipt of notification to request consultation unless a shorter timeframe has been agreed to by the tribe. (Gov. Code §65352.3 (a)(2)).

2. No Statutory Time Limit on SB 18 Tribal Consultation. There is no statutory time limit on SB 18 tribal consultation.

3. Confidentiality: Consistent with the guidelines developed and adopted by the Office of Planning and Research pursuant to Gov. Code §65040.2, the city or county shall protect the confidentiality of the information concerning the specific identity, location, character, and use of places, features and objects described in Public Resources Code §5097.9 and §5097.993 that are within the city’s or county’s jurisdiction. (Gov. Code §65352.3 (b)).

4. Conclusion of SB 18 Tribal Consultation: Consultation should be concluded at the point in which:
a. The parties to the consultation come to a mutual agreement concerning the appropriate measures for preservation or mitigation; or
b. Either the local government or the tribe, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached concerning the appropriate measures of preservation or mitigation. (Tribal Consultation Guidelines, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (2005) at p. 18).

Agencies should be aware that neither AB 52 nor SB 18 precludes agencies from initiating tribal consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with their jurisdictions before the timeframes provided in AB 52 and SB 18. For that reason, we urge you to continue to request Native American Tribal Contact Lists and “Sacred Lands File” searches from the NAHC. The request forms can be found online at: http://nahc.ca.gov/resources/forms/.

NAHC Recommendations for Cultural Resources Assessments

To adequately assess the existence and significance of tribal cultural resources and plan for avoidance, preservation in place, or barring both, mitigation of project-related impacts to tribal cultural resources, the NAHC recommends the following actions:

1. Contact the appropriate regional California Historical Research Information System (CHRIS) Center (https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=30331) for an archaeological records search. The records search will determine:
a. If part or all of the APE has been previously surveyed for cultural resources. b. If any known cultural resources have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE. c. If the probability is low, moderate, or high that cultural resources are located in the APE. d. If a survey is required to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.

2. If an archaeological inventory survey is required, the final stage is the preparation of a professional report detailing the findings and recommendations of the records search and field survey. a. The final report containing site forms, site significance, and mitigation measures should be submitted immediately to the planning department. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum and not be made available for public disclosure.
b. The final written report should be submitted within 3 months after work has been completed to the appropriate regional CHRIS center.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 343, Packet Page 346

3. Contact the NAHC for:
a. A Sacred Lands File search. Remember that tribes do not always record their sacred sites in the Sacred Lands File, nor are they required to do so. A Sacred Lands File search is not a substitute for consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project’s APE.
b. A Native American Tribal Consultation List of appropriate tribes for consultation concerning the project site and to assist in planning for avoidance, preservation in place, or, failing both, mitigation measures.

4. Remember that the lack of surface evidence of archaeological resources (including tribal cultural resources) does not preclude their subsurface existence.
a. Lead agencies should include in their mitigation and monitoring reporting program plan provisions for the identification and evaluation of inadvertently discovered archaeological resources per Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, §15064.5(f) (CEQA Guidelines §15064.5(f)). In areas of identified archaeological sensitivity, a certified archaeologist and a culturally affiliated Native American with knowledge of cultural resources should monitor all ground-disturbing activities.
b. Lead agencies should include in their mitigation and monitoring reporting program plans provisions for the disposition of recovered cultural items that are not burial associated in consultation with culturally affiliated Native Americans.
c. Lead agencies should include in their mitigation and monitoring reporting program plans provisions for the treatment and disposition of inadvertently discovered Native American human remains. Health and Safety Code §7050.5, Public Resources Code §5097.98, and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, §15064.5, subdivisions (d) and (e) (CEQA Guidelines §15064.5, subds. (d) and (e)) address the processes to be followed in the event of an inadvertent discovery of any Native American human remains and associated grave goods in a location other than a dedicated cemetery.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address:

[email protected].

Sincerely,
Cody Campagne
Cultural Resources Analyst
cc: State Clearinghouse

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 344, Packet Page 347 7/15/22, 1:03 PM Mail - Christopher Schmidt - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGIyMTRiYjJkLTU4NDctNDBjMy1hZGRiLWFkYjk3MmEwYzg1MwAQAGw8K40fgLhOi2V9nFM3%2B… 1/2 RE: Notice of Preparation of EIR for 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project Jensen, Fionna <[email protected]>
Thu 7/14/2022 11:57 AM
To: Christopher Schmidt <[email protected]>
[NOTICE: This message originated outside of the City of Monterey mail system -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open aƩachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Chris,
The Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission has no comments. This project was previously considered by the ALUC on September 28, 2020, at which the Commission voted 5-1 to find the proposed development consistent with the 2019 MRY ALUCP. Please let me know if you would like a copy of the ALUC resoluƟon for your records.

Thank you,
Fionna Jensen
Associate Planner
Monterey County Housing and Community Development (HCD) 1441 Schilling Place, 2nd Floor, Salinas CA 93901
Main Line: [(831)%20755-5025](831) 755-5025
Direct Line 831) 796-6407
From: Christopher Schmidt <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 3:08 PM
Subject: NoƟce of PreparaƟon of EIR for 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project [CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the County. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. ]
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Monterey intends to prepare an Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, for the 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project. The NoƟce of PreparaƟon is available for review on the City website at: hƩps://www.monterey.org/Planning and at the City of Monterey, Planning Office, Colton Hall, 1st Floor, 570 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940.

In accordance with Ɵme limits mandated by State law, responses to the NoƟce of PreparaƟon will be accepted from June 24, 2022 through July 25, 2022.

For more informaƟon, please contact Senior Associate Planner Chris Schmidt at (831) 646-3910 or [email protected].
-
Chris Schmidt (he/him)
Senior Associate Planner | City of Monterey
570 Pacific Street | Monterey, CA 93940
831-646-3885 (main) | 831-646-3910 (desk)
[email protected] | have your say | city website

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 345, Packet Page 348 7/15/22, 1:03 PM Mail - Christopher Schmidt - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGIyMTRiYjJkLTU4NDctNDBjMy1hZGRiLWFkYjk3MmEwYzg1MwAQAGw8K40fgLhOi2V9nFM3%2B… 2/2 Useful links:

How to Apply for Planning Permits
Land Use and Regulations
Historic Preservation
GIS Maps and Data
Building and Encroachment Permits
www.monterey.org

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 346, Packet Page 349 Printed on Recycled Paper

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
July 21, 2022
Mr. Christopher Schmidt
Senior Associate Planner
Community Development Department, City of Monterey
570 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
[email protected]

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE 2101 NORTH FREMONT STREET HOTEL PROJECT – DATED JUNE 2022 (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: 2022060567)
Dear Mr. Schmidt:

The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) received a Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project (Project). The Lead Agency is receiving this notice from DTSC because the Project includes one or more of the following: groundbreaking activities, presence of site buildings that may require demolition or modifications, and/or importation of backfill soil.

DTSC recommends that the following issues be evaluated in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the DEIR:

1. The DEIR should acknowledge the potential for historic or future activities on or near the Project site to result in the release of hazardous wastes/substances on the Project site. In instances in which releases have occurred or may occur, further studies should be carried out to delineate the nature and extent of the contamination, and the potential threat to public health and/or the environment should be evaluated. The DEIR should also identify the mechanism(s) to initiate any required investigation and/or remediation and the government agency who will be responsible for providing appropriate regulatory oversight.

2. If buildings or other structures are to be demolished on any project sites included in the proposed project, surveys should be conducted for the presence of Exhibit A
Governor’s Office of Planning & Research
Jul 21 2022

STATE CLEARINGHOUSE

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 347, Packet Page 350 Mr. Christopher Schmidt
July 21, 2022

lead-based paints or products, mercury, asbestos containing materials, and polychlorinated biphenyl caulk. Removal, demolition, and disposal of any of the above-mentioned chemicals should be conducted in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. In addition, sampling near current and/or former buildings should be conducted in accordance with DTSC’s 2006 Interim Guidance Evaluation of School Sites with Potential Contamination from Lead Based Paint, Termiticides, and Electrical Transformers.

3. If any projects initiated as part of the proposed Project require the importation of soil to backfill any excavated areas, proper sampling should be conducted to ensure that the imported soil is free of contamination. DTSC recommends the imported materials be characterized according to DTSC’s 2001 Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material.

DTSC appreciates the opportunity to comment on the DEIR. Should you need any assistance with an environmental investigation, please visit DTSC’s Site Mitigation and Restoration Program page to apply for lead agency oversight. Additional information regarding voluntary agreements with DTSC can be found at DTSC’s Brownfield website.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 255-3582 or via email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Brian McAloon
Project Manager
Site Evaluation and Remediation Unit
Site Mitigation and Restoration Program
Department of Toxic Substances Control
cc: (via email)
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse
[email protected]
Mr. Dave Kereazis
Office of Planning & Environmental Analysis
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 348, Packet Page 351 roject’s Draft Environmental Impact

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 349, Packet Page 352

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 350, Packet Page 353 State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Central Region
1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, California 93710
(559) 243-4005
www.wildlife.ca.gov
Conserving California’s Wildlife Since 1870
July 25, 2022
Chris Schmidt, Senior Associate Planner
City of Monterey Community Development Department
570 Pacific Street
Monterey, California 93940
[email protected]
Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project (Project)
SCH No.: 2022060567
Dear Mr. Schmidt:

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) received a Notice of Preparation from the City of Monterey Community Development Department for the above-referenced Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines.1
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife. Likewise, CDFW appreciates the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law, may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under Fish and Game Code.

CDFW ROLE
CDFW is California’s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State (Fish & G. Code, §§ 711.7, subd. (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. (a)). CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (Id., § 1802). Similarly, for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts,

1 CEQA is codified in the California Public Resources Code in section 21000 et seq. The “CEQA Guidelines” are found in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with section 15000. 







  





EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 351, Packet Page 354 Chris Schmidt, Senior Associate Planner
City of Monterey Community Development Department
July 25, 2022

focusing specifically on projects and related activities that have the potential to adversely affect fish and wildlife resources.

Nesting Birds: CDFW has jurisdiction over actions with potential to result in the disturbance or destruction of active nest sites or the unauthorized take of birds. Fish and Game Code sections that protect birds, eggs and nests include, sections 3503 (regarding unlawful take, possession or needless destruction of the nest or eggs of any bird), 3503.5 (regarding the take, possession or destruction of any birds-of-prey or their nests or eggs), and 3513 (regarding unlawful take of any migratory nongame bird).

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY
Proponent: Lakshmi Hotel Partners
Objective: The Project includes demolition of an existing one-story, 18-guest room hotel and 134-seat restaurant and the construction of a new four-story, 42 guest room branded hotel. The Project also includes a text amendment to the North Fremont Specific Plan and amendment to the City’s off-street parking standards and load zone requirement, and readoption of the parking calculation of the City Municipal Code.

Location: The 0.58-acre Project site is located at 2101 North Fremont Street in the City of Monterey, California.

Timeframe: N/A

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Nesting Birds: CDFW encourages implementation of Project construction activities during the bird non-nesting season. However, if ground-disturbing activities must occur during the breeding season (i.e., February through mid-September), CDFW recommends preconstruction surveys for nesting birds and an appropriate no-disturbance buffer be implemented around active nests. The Project’s applicant is responsible for ensuring that implementation of the Project does not result in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or relevant Fish and Game Codes as referenced above.

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database that may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations (Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (e)).

Accordingly, please report any special-status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to the CNDDB. The CNDDB field survey form can be found at the following link: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submitting-Data. The completed form can be emailed to CNDDB at the following email address: [email protected].

The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found at the following link:
https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals. 







  





EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 352, Packet Page 355 Chris Schmidt, Senior Associate Planner
City of Monterey Community Development Department
July 25, 2022

FILING FEES
If it is determined that the Project will impact fish and/or wildlife, an assessment of filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the fee is required in order for the underlying project approval to be operative, vested, and final (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089). With this cursory review, CDFW anticipates that the Project will require the payment of fees.

CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Project to assist the County in identifying and mitigating the Project’s impacts on biological resources. If you have any questions, please contact Jim Vang, Environmental Scientist, at the address provided on this letterhead, by telephone at (559) 580-3203, or by electronic mail at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Bob Stafford For Julie A. Vance
Regional Manager
ec: Jeff Cann; [email protected]
CDFW








  





EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 353, Packet Page 356 Appendix B
North Fremont Specific Plan and Monterey City Code Amendments

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 354, Packet Page 357

MEMORANDUM
TO: Nicole West, Rincon
FROM: Chris Schmidt, Senior Associate Planner
DATE: March 20, 2023
SUBJECT: Specific Plan and Zoning Amendments
Specific Plan Amendments (Attachment 1)

The Specific Plan is not part of the General Plan; rather, it is a tool used to implement the General Plan

Until then, the Specific Plan development objectives, standards and guidelines do not apply to VAF-zoned properties.

and Guidelines):

Project sites located within the Visitor Accommodation Facility Zoning District shall comply with the land use and development standards contained in the City of Monterey Charter, except as otherwise stated therein
Zoning City Code Amendments
Section 38-36.A
A. Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required.

Hotels and
Motels
One per guest room; plus two for every 50 rooms for hotels and motels with over 49 rooms; plus parking, as required for accessory uses.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 355, Packet Page 358 Section 38-117
A use permit may be approved for nonresidential uses, reducing the number of parking spaces or loading spaces to less than the number and size specified in the schedules in Section 38- 115, provided that the following findings are made:

A. The parking demand will be less than the requirement in Schedule A or B; and B. The probable long-term occupancy of the building or structure, based on its design, will not generate additional parking demand; or
C. There is significant public parking within a reasonable distance that has been provided or will be provided within a reasonable time.

In reaching a decision, the Planning Commission shall consider survey data submitted by an applicant or collected at the applicant’s request and expense.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 356, Packet Page 359 north fremont specific plan
9 April 1, 2014
Goal c. Provide a safe, efficient, well-maintained, and environmentally sound roadway system that supports an equality of choice among all modes of transportation.

Goal f. Provide an attractive and convenient transit
service for Monterey citizens, especially those in the
community who cannot or choose not to own a private automobile.

Goal g. Provide a transportation system that supports
the local economy.

Policy g.1. Provide pedestrian-friendly environments
in the commercial business districts to extend the
time spent in the commercial business districts and enhance the overall shopping experience.

Policy g.2. Do not allow auto-oriented level-ofservice standards to negatively affect the shopping experience in commercial business districts.

Policy g.6. Improve the pedestrian environment along North Fremont Street.

This Specific Plan replaces the North Fremont Area Plan with a more comprehensive strategy for the enhancement of this commercial corridor as mixeduse neighborhood. The Specific Plan provides tools beyond the capabilities of the Area Plan, such as area-specific development standards and design guidelines, and an inventory of existing and proposed improvements to the neighborhood’s infrastructure.

The Financing and Implementation chapter identifies potential funding sources for proposed rights-ofway improvements. Funding may include grants, assessment districts, or a combination thereof .This chapter also recommends a strategy for obtaining the necessary funding to meet the project recommendations.Under California law, local governments can use Specific Plans as tools to plan for needed revitalization and change, both in existing neighborhoods and new development areas. Specific Plans provide greater planning and design guidance than can be included in a General Plan, and they allow local governments the ability to address complex land ownership patterns and infrastructure needs. 7KH 6SHFLILF 3ODQ LVQRW SDUW RI WKH *HQHUDO 3ODQ  UDWKHU LW LV D
WRRO XVHG WR LPSOHPHQW WKH *HQHUDO 3ODQ
Specific Plans can jump-start new development in depressed areas, and can ensure that the public gets the quality it desires in any new development.The planning process for the North Fremont Specific Plan included several community meetings within the North Fremont business district as well as the adjacent residential neighborhoods. The community meeting participants were led through various exercises to define planning issues, identify opportunities, and solicit input on draft plan concepts. A Planning Commission Ad Hoc Committee also reviewed and commented on the plan at each stage of its development. introduction
Attachment 1
Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 357, Packet Page 360 26 April 1, 2014
challenges & opportunities
An objective of the Specific Plan is to allow greater use and development flexibility within the VAF zoning districts. Therefore, before the Specific Plan can be fully implemented, a ballot measure and successful vote of the people lifting the City Charter restrictions on uses and development standards within the VAFzoned properties on North Fremont will be required.8QWLO WKHQ WKH 6SHFLILF 3ODQ GHYHORSPHQWREMHFWLYHVVWDQGDUGVDQGJXLGHOLQHVGRQRWDSSO\WR9$)]RQHGSURSHUWLHVThe quantity of residential development within the City’s Mixed-Use neighborhoods is defined by the General Plan, which allows 130 dwelling units along the North Fremont Corridor. Residential development that exceeds these thresholds would require a General Plan Amendment and associated environmental analysis. The Specific Plan encourages residential development as a part of a mixed-use project, which is a key ingredient to establishing a vibrant, pedestrian rich neighborhood. While the design of new development shall be oriented to the pedestrian, population must also be added to the planning area to create the vibrancy necessary to fulfill the North Fremont Specific Plan Vision.

Attachment 1
Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 358, Packet Page 361 north fremont specific plan 47 April 1, 2014
05 land use &
development
Land Use and Development - Objectives, Standards and GuidelinesThe purpose of this section is to provide objectives, standards and guidelines for new land uses and development within the Planning Area. While the Specific Plan goals define the Specific Plan vision at varying levels of specificity, the purpose of the land use and development objectives is to provide a measurement for how adequately a project implements the Specific Plan vision and goals. When a project is analyzed for consistency with the Specific Plan, the objectives will serve as findings for approval. A citation of how the project meets a specific guideline or guidelines could serve as support for the findings.3URMHFW VLWHV ORFDWHG ZLWKLQ WKH 9LVLWRU$FFRPPRGDWLRQ )DFLOLW\ =RQLQJ 'LVWULFW VKDOOFRPSO\ ZLWK WKH ODQG XVH DQG GHYHORSPHQWVWDQGDUGV FRQWDLQHG LQ WKH &LW\ RI 0RQWHUH\&KDUWHUH[FHSWDVRWKHUZLVHVWDWHGWKHUHLQWhat’s the Difference Between a Standard and a Guideline?A standard is a requirement for all new development. However, a guideline suggests how a development might achieve a particular design objective. If a project incorporates features that are inconsistent with a particular guideline, the features may be deemed appropriate if adequate support is provided that the features achieve the particular objective.

Attachment 1
Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 359, Packet Page 362 Appendix C
ƵůƚƵƌĂůResources Technical Report

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 360, Packet Page 363 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
Cultural Resources Technical Report
prepared for
City of Monterey
Community Development Department
570 Pacific Street
Monterey, California 93940
Contact: Chris Schmidt, Senior Associate Planner
prepared by
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
2511 Garden Road, Suite C-250
Monterey, California 93940
November 2022

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 361, Packet Page 364 Please cite this report as follows:

Losco, A., L. Maldonado, J. Murphy, and S. Treffers
2022. 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project, Monterey, Monterey County, California. Rincon Consultants Project No. 22-13039. Report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, California

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 362, Packet Page 365 Table of Contents
Cultural Resources Technical Report i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................1 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................2 Project Site and Description................................................................................................2 Personnel ............................................................................................................................2 2 Regulatory Setting ..........................................................................................................................1 California Environmental Quality Act..................................................................................1 National Register of Historic Places .......................................................................2 California Register of Historical Resources ............................................................3 California Assembly Bill 52 of 2014........................................................................4 California Health and Safety Code ......................................................................................5 California Public Resources Code §5097.98........................................................................5 Local Regulations ................................................................................................................5 City of Monterey Historic Properties Ordinance ...................................................5 3 Natural and Cultural Setting ...........................................................................................................7 Natural Setting ....................................................................................................................7 Cultural Setting ...................................................................................................................8 Indigenous History .................................................................................................8 Ethnographic Setting........................................................................................... 11 Post-Contact Setting ........................................................................................... 12 4 Methods....................................................................................................................................... 16 Background and Archival Research.................................................................................. 16 Archival Research................................................................................................ 16 California Historical Resources Information System Records Search................. 16 Sacred Lands File Search..................................................................................... 16 Field Survey...................................................................................................................... 17 Built Environment Survey ................................................................................... 17 Archaeological Resources Survey ....................................................................... 17 5 Findings........................................................................................................................................ 18 Known Cultural Resources Studies .................................................................................. 18 Study S-027043 ................................................................................................... 18 Study S-033677 ................................................................................................... 18 Study S-045829 ................................................................................................... 18 Known Cultural Resources ............................................................................................... 18 Aerial Imagery and Historical Topographic Maps Review ............................................... 19 Sacred Land File Search.................................................................................................... 19 Survey Results .................................................................................................................. 19

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 363, Packet Page 366 City of Monterey
2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
ii
Built Environment Resources.............................................................................. 19 Archaeological Resources ................................................................................... 26 6 Impacts Analysis and Conclusions ............................................................................................... 28 Historical Built Environment Resources........................................................................... 28 Historical and Unique Archaeological Resources............................................................. 28 Recommended Mitigation .................................................................................. 28 Human Remains ............................................................................................................... 29 7 References ................................................................................................................................... 30 Figures
Figure 1 Regional Location................................................................................................................3 Figure 2 Project Site ..........................................................................................................................4 Figure 3 Proposed Project Site Plan..................................................................................................1 Figure 4 Proposed Project Elevations ...............................................................................................2 Figure 5 Project Site, 2101 Fremont Street, Monterey, California ................................................ 20 Figure 5 2101 Fremont Street, East Elevation of restaurant and sign, Facing Southwest ............ 22 Figure 6 West and South Elevations of guest rooms, Facing Northeast........................................ 22 Figure 7 Guest room showing entrance and window, West Elevation, Facing East...................... 23 Figure 8 West and South Elevations of office, Facing Northeast................................................... 23 Figure 9 East and South Elevations of restaurant connected to the motel, Facing West ............. 24 Appendices
Appendix A California Historical Resources Information System Records Search Appendix B Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Request Appendix C California Department of Parks (DPR) 523 Series Forms

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 364, Packet Page 367 Executive Summary
Cultural Resources Technical Report 1
Executive Summary
Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) was retained by the City of Monterey to conduct a cultural resources assessment for the 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel project (project), in northeastern Monterey, Monterey County, California. Totaling 25,258 square feet, the project encompasses one parcel at the intersection of Casa Verde Way and North Fremont Street. The project involves the demolition of the existing motel building and construction of a new hotel building and 42 parking stalls. The project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City of Monterey is the lead agency under CEQA.

This assessment included a cultural resources records search of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search, a pedestrian field survey of the project site, and the preparation of this report to summarize the results of these activities.

The field survey identified one property on the project site that is more than 45 years old: 2101 North Fremont Street (subject property). The property was recorded and evaluated for National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and local designation eligibility. The property was recommended ineligible for the NRHP, CRHR, and local designation and is not considered a historical resource pursuant to the CEQA, as a result. Proposed demolition of the subject property therefore would not result in a substantial adverse change to historical resources.

The records searches, ongoing Native American scoping, and archaeological pedestrian survey identified no archaeological resources at the project site. Further, the CHRIS records search failed to identify any other cultural resources within the project site or within a 0.25-mile radius. There are no archaeological resources known to exist in close proximity to the project site, but the SLF results were positive and the project site is considered moderately sensitive for archaeological resources.

The absence of substantial prehistoric or historic-period archaeological remains within the immediate vicinity, along with the existing level of disturbance in the project site, suggest there is a low potential for encountering intact subsurface archaeological deposits. One mitigation measure is recommended to address the unanticipated discovery of cultural resources.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 365, Packet Page 368 City of Monterey
2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
2 1 Introduction
The City of Monterey (the City) retained Rincon Consultants Inc. (Rincon) to conduct a cultural resources study for the 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project (project) in Monterey, California. This technical report documents the results of the study and tasks conducted by Rincon, specifically, a cultural resources records search, Sacred Lands File (SLF) search, and a field survey. This study has been completed pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The City of Monterey is the lead agency under CEQA.

Project Site and Description
The project site is located at 2101 North Fremont Street (APN 013-112-045) at the northwest corner of Casa Verde Way and North Fremont Street in the City of Monterey, Monterey County, California (Figure 1). Specifically, the project encompasses portions of Section 29 of Township 15S, Range 01E on the Seaside, California United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle (Figure 2). The project site is 25,258 square feet (0.58 acres) in the North Fremont Specific Plan area and zoned Visitor Accommodation Facility.

The proposed project includes demolition of the existing uses on site, including a one-story, 18- guest room motel, a 134-seat restaurant, and a surface parking lot. The proposed project involves construction of a new four-story, 42 guest room branded hotel and a surface parking lot with 42 parking spaces. The proposed project requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the proposed hotel use (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

Construction of the proposed project is expected to occur over approximately 17 months.

Construction activities would be separated into several phases, including demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Construction equipment for the proposed project would include earthwork equipment such as tractors, backhoes, cranes, bulldozers, forklifts, graders, pavers, and loaders, among others. Grading would require 1,483 cubic yards of cut and 134 cubic yards of fill, with 1,349 cubic yards to be exported off site.

Personnel
Rincon Senior Architectural Historian JulieAnn Murphy, MS, provided management oversight for this cultural resources study. Architectural Historian Ashley Losco, MS, is the primary author of this report. Rincon Archaeologist Laura Maldonado, MA, conducted the field survey and is a contributing author on this report. Archaeologist Elaine Foster, MA, RPA, performed the cultural resources records search. Steven Treffers, MHP, provided senior oversight. Geographic Information Systems Analyst Allysen Valencia prepared the figures found in this report. Principal Shannon Carmack reviewed this report for quality control. Ms. Murphy, Ms. Losco, Ms. Maldonado, Ms. Foster, Mr.

Treffers, and Ms. Carmack all meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in their respective fields (36 CFR, Part 61).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 366, Packet Page 369 Introduction
Cultural Resources Technical Report 3
Figure 1 Regional Location

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 367, Packet Page 370 City of Monterey
2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
4 Figure 2 Project Site

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 368, Packet Page 371 Introduction
Cultural Resources Technical Report 1 Figure 3 Proposed Project Site Plan Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 369, Packet Page 372 City of Monterey
2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project Figure 4 Proposed Project Elevations 2 Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 370, Packet Page 373 Regulatory Setting
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 1
2 Regulatory Setting
This section includes a discussion of the applicable state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, and standards governing cultural resources, which must be adhered to before and during implementation of the project.

California Environmental Quality Act
California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21804.1 requires lead agencies determine if a project could have a significant impact on historical or unique archaeological resources. As defined in PRC Section 21084.1, a historical resource is a resource listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), a resource included in a local register of historical resources or identified in a historical resources survey pursuant to PRC Section 5024.1(g), or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant. PRC Section 21084.1 also states resources meeting the above criteria are presumed to be historically or cultural significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates otherwise. Resources listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) are automatically listed in the CRHR and are, therefore, historical resources under CEQA. Historical resources may include eligible built environment resources and archaeological resources of the precontact or historic periods.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c) provides further guidance on the consideration of archaeological resources. If an archaeological resource does not qualify as a historical resource, it may meet the definition of a “unique archaeological resource” as identified in PRC Section 21083.2.

PRC Section 21083.2(g) defines a unique archaeological resource as an artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria: 1) it contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information, 2) has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type, or 3) is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person.

If an archaeological resource does not qualify as a historical or unique archaeological resource, the impacts of a project on those resources will be less than significant and need not be considered further (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[c][4]). CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 also provides guidance for addressing the potential presence of human remains, including those discovered during the implementation of a project.

According to CEQA, an impact that results in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is considered a significant impact on the environment. A substantial adverse change could result from physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of the historical resource would be materially impaired (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 [b][1]). Material impairment is defined as demolition or alteration in an adverse manner [of] those characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for inclusion in, the CRHR or a local register (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[b][2][A]).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 371, Packet Page 374 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
2 If it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that resources cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation measures are required (PRC Section 21083.2[a][b]).

Section 15126.4 of the CEQA Guidelines stipulates an EIR shall describe feasible measures to minimize significant adverse impacts. In addition to being fully enforceable, mitigation measures must be completed within a defined time period and be roughly proportional to the impacts of the project. Generally, a project which is found to comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (the Standards) is considered to be mitigated below a level of significance (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 [b][1]). For historical resources of an archaeological nature, lead agencies should also seek to avoid damaging effects where feasible. Preservation in place is the preferred manner to mitigate impacts to archaeological sites; however, data recovery through excavation may be the only option in certain instances (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4[b][3]).

National Register of Historic Places
Although the project does not have a federal nexus, properties which are listed in or have been formally determined eligible for listing in the NRHP are automatically listed in the CRHR. The following is therefore presented to provide applicable regulatory context. The NRHP was authorized by Section 101 of the National Historic Preservation Act and is the nation’s official list of cultural resources worthy of preservation. The NRHP recognizes the quality of significance in American, state, and local history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects. Per 36 CFR Part 60.4, a property is eligible for listing in the NRHP if it meets one or more of the following criteria:

Criterion A: Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history
Criterion B: Is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past Criterion C: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of installation, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction
Criterion D: Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history In addition to meeting at least one of the above designation criteria, resources must also retain integrity. The National Park Service recognizes seven aspects or qualities that, considered together, define historic integrity. To retain integrity, a property must possess several, if not all, of these seven qualities, defined as follows:

Location: The place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred
Design: The combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property
Setting: The physical environment of a historic property

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 372, Packet Page 375 Regulatory Setting
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 3
Materials: The physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property Workmanship: The physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory
Feeling: A property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time
Association: The direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property
Certain properties are generally considered ineligible for listing in the NRHP, including cemeteries, birthplaces, graves of historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions, relocated structures, or commemorative properties. Additionally, a property must be at least 50 years of age to be eligible for listing in the NRHP. The National Park Service states that 50 years is the general estimate of the time needed to develop the necessary historical perspective to evaluate significance (National Park Service 1997:41). Properties which are less than 50 years must be determined to have “exceptional importance” to be considered eligible for NRHP listing.

California Register of Historical Resources
The CRHR was established in 1992 and codified by PRC Sections 5024.1 and 4852. The CRHR is an authoritative listing and guide to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens in identifying the existing historical resources of the state and to indicate which resources deserve to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change (Public Resources Code, 5024.1(a)). The criteria for eligibility for the CRHR are consistent with the NRHP criteria but have been modified for state use in order to include a range of historical resources that better reflect the history of California (Public Resources Code, 5024.1(b)). Unlike the NRHP however, the CRHR does not have a defined age threshold for eligibility; rather, a resource may be eligible for the CRHR if it can be demonstrated sufficient time has passed to understand its historical or architectural significance (California Office of Historic Preservation 2006). Furthermore, resources may still be eligible for listing in the CRHR even if they do not retain sufficient integrity for NRHP eligibility (California Office of Historic Preservation 2006). Generally, the California Office of Historic Preservation recommends resources over 45 years of age be recorded and evaluated for historical resources eligibility (California Office of Historic Preservation 1995:2).

A property is eligible for listing in the CRHR if it meets one of more of the following criteria:

Criterion 1: Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage
Criterion 2: Is associated with the lives of persons important to our past Criterion 3: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values
Criterion 4: Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 373, Packet Page 376 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
4 California Assembly Bill 52 of 2014
As of July 1, 2015, Assembly Bill (AB) 52 was enacted and expands CEQA by defining a new resource category, “tribal cultural resources”. AB 52 establishes, “a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment” (PRC Section 21084.2). It further states the CEQA lead agency shall establish measures to avoid impacts that would alter the significant characteristics of a tribal cultural resource, when feasible (PRC Section 21084.3).

PRC Section 21074 (a)(1)(A) and (B) define tribal cultural resources as “sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe” and that meets at least one of the following criteria, as summarized in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G:
1) Listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(k)
2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of PRC Section 5024.1. In applying these criteria, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

AB 52 also establishes a formal consultation process with California Native American tribes that must be completed before a CEQA document can be certified. Under AB 52, lead agencies are required to “begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project.” California Native American tribes to be included in the process are those that have requested notice of projects proposed within the jurisdiction of the lead agency.

California Senate Bill 18 of 2004
California Government Code Section 65352.3 (adopted pursuant to the requirements of Senate Bill [SB] 18) requires local governments to contact, refer plans to, and consult with tribal organizations prior to making a decision to adopt or amend a general or specific plan. The tribal organizations eligible to consult have traditional lands in a local government’s jurisdiction and are identified, upon request, by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). As noted in the California Office of Planning and Research’s Tribal Consultation Guidelines (2005), “the intent of SB 18 is to provide California Native American tribes an opportunity to participate in local land use decisions at an early planning stage, for the purpose of protecting, or mitigating impacts to, cultural places.” SB 18 refers to PRC Section 5097.9 and 5097.995 to define cultural places as:
ƒ A Native American sanctified cemetery, place of worship, religious or ceremonial site, or sacred shrine (PRC Section 5097.9)
ƒ A Native American historic, cultural, or sacred site, that is listed or may be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources pursuant to Section 5024.1, including any historic or prehistoric ruins, any burial ground, any archaeological or historic site (PRC Section 5097.995)

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 374, Packet Page 377 Regulatory Setting
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 5
California Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code states that in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the coroner of the county in which the remains are discovered has determined if the remains are subject to the Coroner’s authority. If the human remains are of Native American origin, the coroner must notify the NAHC within 24 hours of this identification.

California Public Resources Code §5097.98
Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code states that the NAHC, upon notification of the discovery of Native American human remains pursuant to Health and Safety Code §7050.5, shall immediately notify those persons (i.e., the Most Likely Descendant [MLD]) that it believes to be descended from the deceased. With permission of the landowner or a designated representative, the MLD may inspect the remains and any associated cultural materials and make recommendations for treatment or disposition of the remains and associated grave goods. The MLD shall provide recommendations or preferences for treatment of the remains and associated cultural materials within 48 hours of being granted access to the site.

Local Regulations
City of Monterey Historic Properties Ordinance
The City of Monterey Historic Properties Ordinance (Ordinance No. 3472 [2012]) authorizes the Historic Preservation Commission to designate historic resources as H-1 Landmark Overlay Zoning, H-2 City Historic Resource Overlay Zoning, or H-D Historic District Overlay Zoning, as approved by the City Council, by the procedures outlined in the ordinances. An eligible property may be nominated and designated as one of the three zoning overlays if it satisfies the requirements set forth below.

H-1 Landmark Overlay Zoning
H-1 zoning is intended to identify and protect the most important historic resources in the City, generally including properties with statewide, national, or international historic significance where that significance would be recognized outside of the City. H-1 Landmark zoning may be applied only to properties which meet NRHP criteria, and the property is the first, last, only, rare, or most significant resource of its type in the region.

H-2 City Historic Resource Overlay Zoning
H-2 zoning is intended to identify and protect historic resources in the City that would be recognized as resources with local historic importance and their historic importance would not generally be recognized outside the immediate area of the Monterey Peninsula. H-2 City Historic Resource zoning may be applied to properties which meet National Register or California Register Criteria as defined.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 375, Packet Page 378 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
6 H-D Historic District Overlay Zoning
H-D zoning is intended to identify and protect geographical areas with a concentration of historic resources, where preservation of the individual historic resources and their historic setting is important to understanding Monterey’s history. H-D Historic District zoning may be applied to a geographic area which meets National Register criteria in National Register Bulletin 15 or California Register criteria for districts.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 376, Packet Page 379 Natural and Cultural Setting
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 7
3 Natural and Cultural Setting
This section provides background information pertaining to the natural and cultural context of the project site. It places the project site within the broader natural environment which has sustained populations throughout history. This section also provides an overview of regional indigenous history, local ethnography, and post-contact history. This background information describes the distribution and type of cultural resources documented within the vicinity of the project site to inform the cultural resources sensitivity assessment and the context within which resources have been evaluated.

Natural Setting
The project site lies in Monterey County at an approximate elevation of 13.1 to 23.5 meters (43 to 77 feet) above mean sea level. None of the surrounding area retains its natural setting, with the project site located in a commercial and residential area characterized by a mix of single-family homes and apartment complexes. Del Monte Lake is located approximately 0.33 mile (0.55 kilometers) southwest of the project site. Additionally, Laguna Del Rey is located approximately 0.52 mile (0.83 kilometers) northwest of the project site. Vegetation within the site consists of ornamental plants and shrubs.

According to published geologic mapping, the project site is underlain by Quaternary age, alluvial deposits (Dibblee and Minch 2005). Three soil series have been documented within the project site, including the Baywood Series, Dune Land, and the Oceano Series (California Soil Resource Lab 2003a, 2003b, 2003c). Approximately 85 percent of the project site consists of Baywood Series, 10 percent is Dune Land, and 5 percent is Oceano Series.

The Baywood series consists of deep, somewhat excessively drained soils that formed in old sand dunes near the coast. Baywood soils have slopes of 0 to 50 percent. The mean annual precipitation is about 25 inches and the mean annual air temperature is about 56 degrees F. The Ap horizon (0 to 5 inches) and A12 horizon (5 to 13 inches) is made of up of very dark grayish brown fine sand. The A13 horizon (13 to 36 inches) is made up of dark brown fine sand that is moist, massive, soft, very friable, non-sticky and non-plastic. The C1 horizon (36 to 55 inches) is made up of dark grayish brown fine sand, indistinct blotches two to five inches across, more reddish in color. All horizons of the Baywood series are moderately alkaline with a pH of 6.0 (California Soil Resource Lab 2015a).

The Oceano series consists of deep excessively drained soils that formed in material weathered from sandy eolian deposits. Oceano soils are on rolling dune-like topography, near the ocean and have slopes of 0 to 50 percent. The mean annual precipitation is about 15 inches and the mean annual air temperature is about 58 degrees F. The Ap horizon (0 to 1.5 inches), A2 (1.5 to 4 inches), A3 (4 to 15 inches), and AC (15 to 20 inches) horizons is made up of light brownish gray sand, that is moist, massive, soft, very friable, and moderately to strongly acid with a pH of 6.1 to 5.5. The C1 (20 to 39 inches), C2 (39 to 55 inches), C3 (55 to 75 inches) and C4 (75 to 90 inches) horizons are made up of light yellowish brown sand and is massive, soft, very friable, plastic, with many fine interstitial pores, and is strongly acid (California Soil Resource Lab 2015a).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 377, Packet Page 380 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
8 Cultural Setting
Indigenous History
The project lies in the Central Coast archaeological region (Jones et al. 2007; Glassow et al. 2007) which has been defined as extending from south of San Francisco Bay to the northern edge of the California Bight (Jones et al. 2007:125). Following Jones et al. (2007:137), the prehistoric cultural chronology for the Central Coast can be generally divided into six periods: Paleo-Indian (ca. 10000– 8000 before common era [BCE]), Millingstone/Early Archaic (8000-3500 BCE), Early (3500-600 BCE), Middle (600 BCE- 1000 common era [CE]), Middle-Late Transition (1000-1250 CE), and Late (1250 CE-contact [ca. 1769 CE]).

Several chronological sequences have been devised to understand cultural changes along the Central Coast from the Millingstone Period to contact. Jones (1993) and Jones and Waugh (1995) presented a Central Coast sequence that integrated data from archaeological studies conducted since the 1980s. Three periods are presented in their prehistoric sequence subsequent to the Millingstone Period: Early, Middle, and Late periods. More recently, Jones and Ferneau (2002:213) updated the sequence following the Millingstone Period as follows: Early, Early-Middle Transition, Middle, Middle-Late Transition, and Late periods. The archaeology of the Central Coast subsequent to the Millingstone Period is distinct from that of the Bay Area and Central Valley, and the region has more in common with the Santa Barbara Channel area during the Middle and Middle-Late Transition periods, but few similarities during the Late Period (Jones & Ferneau 2002:213).

Paleo-Indian Period (ca. 10,000–8000 BCE)
When Wallace developed the Early Man horizon (referred to herein as the Paleo-Indian Period) in the 1950s, little evidence of human presence along the California coast prior to 6000 BCE existed.

Archaeological work in the intervening years has identified numerous sites older than this date, and it is likely that more Paleo-Indian coastal sites are presently under water as it is estimated that 10,000 years ago sea levels were 15 – 20 meters lower than sea levels are today (Bickel 1978:7). This estimate places the central California shoreline during this period at approximately 10 kilometers farther west than today’s coastline (Breschini and Haversat 1991:126).

Most of the earliest accepted dates for occupation within the Central Coast are located in San Luis Obispo County. CA-SLO-1764 (Lebow et al. 2001) and Cross Creek (CA-SLO-1797; Jones et al. 2002), and CA-SLO-832 ( Jones et al. 2001) near Pismo Beach, have produced radiocarbon dates from approximately 9,000 years ago (Jones and Ferneau 2002). One occupation site located in the Monterey Bay area, the Scotts Valley Site (CA-SCR-177), and one occupation site located in southern Santa Clara Valley, have produced debated radiocarbon dates more than 9,000 years ago, ranging from 7,180 to 10,080 years ago (Cariter 1989; Fitzgerald and Porcassi 1966).

Typically, artifact assemblages from the Paleo-Indian Period lack groundstone implements and an abundance of faunal remains; however, assemblages at CA-SLO-1764 and CA-SLO-1797 indicate early use of millingstone technology alongside flaked stone artifacts (Lebow et al. 2002; Jones et al. 2002). Flaked stone tools are common in this period, such as the eccentric crescent, present in CASCR-177 abundantly, which is thus far exclusive to the Paleo-Indian period (Cartier 1989).

Furthermore, this period shoes use of large side-notched points of the Central Coast Stemmed series which date to as early as 8,000 years ago (Justice 2002). Points of this type have been recovered at Diablo Canyon (CA-SLO-2; Greenwood 1972), Cross Creek (CA-SLO-1797; Jones et a. 2002), and Little Pico Creek (CA-SLO-175; Jones and Waugh 1995). Additionally, a fluted point was

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 378, Packet Page 381 Natural and Cultural Setting
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 9
reportedly found on the surface in Nipomo, San Luis Obispo County (Mills et al. 2005; Jones et al. 2007).

Millingstone Period (8000–3500 BCE)
The Millingstone Period, as defined by Wallace (1955, 1978), is characterized by an ecological adaptation to collecting suggested by the appearance and abundance of well-made milling implements. Millingstones occur in large numbers for the first time in the region’s archaeological record and are even more numerous near the end of this period. Aside from millingstones, typical artifacts during this period include crude core and cobble-core tools, flake tools, large side-notched projectile points, and pitted stones (Jones et al. 2007).

The Millingstone Period within the Central Coast somewhat corresponds with King’s (1981, 1990) Early Period of the Santa Barbara Channel area, although King’s Early period starts later and lasts longer (5500 – 1350 BCE). The Cross Creek site (CA-SLO-1797) in San Luis Obispo County is a Millingstone occupation site that returned radiocarbon dates ranging between 9,500 – 4,700 years ago. This site represents one of the oldest expressions of the Millingstone pattern (Jones et al. 2002; Jones et al. 2007;). Within the Elkhorn Slough of the Monterey Bay Area, CA-MNT-229 produced reliable radiocarbon dates between 6,200-4,000 BCE (Jones and Jones 1992), and younger expressions of the pattern can be found in CA-MNT-1232/H and CA-SCR-177 in the Monterey Bay area (Jones et al. 2007).

No less than 42 sites dating to this period have been identified in various settings, including rocky coasts, estuaries, and nearshore interior valleys (Jones et al. 2007). The larger sites usually contain extensive midden deposits, possible subterranean house pits, and cemeteries. Most of these sites probably reflect intermittent use over many years of local cultural habitation and resource exploitation, with an emphasis on marine resources. Evidence at Elkhorn Slough (CA-MNT-229) confirms an early preference for estuarine and lacustrine settings. A lack of shell beads and flaked obsidian tools suggests low intensity inter-regional exchange (Jones and Jones 1992).

Early Period (3500–600 BCE)
An extensive series of shoreline midden deposits within the Central Coast region date to the Early Period, suggesting an increase in occupation of the open coast (Jones 1995; Jones and Waugh 1995, 1997). These include estuarine sites in San Luis Obispo County (CA-SLO-165) and open-coast sites in the Monterey Bay area (CA-MNT-73, CA-MNT-108, and CA-MNT-1228). Sites dating to this period are marked by large lithic artifact assemblages consisting of Central Coast Stemmed Series and sidenotched projectile points. Square-stemmed and side-notched points have also been found in deposits at Willow Creek in Big Sur (CA-MNT-282), and Little Pico II on the San Luis Obispo coast (CASLO-175) (Jones and Ferneau 2002). This trend, first identified by Rogers (1929), has since become apparent at numerous sites throughout the Central Coast. In many cases, manifestations of this trend are associated with the establishment of new settlements (Jones et al. 2007).

The material culture recovered from Early Period sites within the Central Coast region provides evidence for continued exploitation of inland plant and coastal marine resources. Artifacts include milling slabs and handstones, as well as mortars and pestles, which were used for processing a variety of plant resources. Bipointed bone gorge hooks were used for fishing. Assemblages also include a suite of Olivella beads, bone tools, and pendants made from talc schist. Square abalone shell (Haliotis spp.) beads have been found in Monterey Bay, but not in the Big Sur or San Luis Obispo areas (Jones and Waugh 1997:122).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 379, Packet Page 382 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
10 Shell beads and obsidian are hallmarks of the trade and exchange networks of the central and southern California coasts. The archaeological record indicates a substantial increase in the abundance of obsidian at Early period sites in the Monterey Bay and San Luis Obispo areas (Jones and Waugh 1997:124–126). Obsidian trade continued to increase during the following the Middle period.

The Early Period shows an increase in hunting and fishing over the Millingstone Period. SLO-165, with rabbits and fish remains present in greater concentrations (Jones et al. 2007).

Middle Period (600 BCE–1000 CE)
The Middle Period saw a population increase as evidenced by the increased number of new settlements spanning throughout the Central Coast. Newly established settlements of this period include CA-MNT-108, CA-MNT-391, CA-MNT-1228, CA-SCR-7, CA-SLO-165, and CA-SlO-175 (Jones et al. 2007). During this period, evidence from CA-MNT-391 shows a preference for burials in a flexed position and associated burial items, including projectile points and bone gorges. Olivella shell beads are found in abundance associated with burials dating to the Middle Period (Hildebrandt 1997; Jones et al. 2007).

The Middle-Period is generally characterized by a shift in subsistence patterns, including more abundant use of mortars and pestles as well as higher use of larger stemmed and notched projectile points. Additionally, the first appearance of circular shell and bone fishhooks and notched net sinkers were observed within sites dating to this period. Evidence shows that marine resources were still abundantly utilized, with an increase in pinniped faunal remains, such as fur seals (Jones and Ferneau 2002; Boone 2012). Faunal assemblages show that marine diets were supplemented with small mammals, such as rabbits (Jones et al. 2007). Additionally, evidence from macro botanical analysis indicates a shift from small seeds to a heavy reliance on acorns (Wohlgemuth 1996; Hildebrandt 1997).

Middle-Late Transition Period (1000–1250 CE)
The Middle-Late Transition period is marked by relative instability and change, with major changes in diet, settlement patterns, and interregional exchange. The relatively ubiquitous Middle period shell midden sites found along the Central Coast were abandoned by the end of the Middle-Late Transition period; therefore, most Transition period and Late period sites were first occupied at this time (Jones and Ferneau 2002:213, 219). Instead of large year-round habitation patterns, MiddleLate and Late period sites show smaller seasonal settlements (Boone 2012). CA-SLO-239 has been tentatively dated to the Middle-Late Transition Period and contains the only residential feature, a circular house floor (Jones et al. 2007).

During the Middle-Late Transition period within the Central Coast region, projectile points diagnostic of both the Middle and Late periods are found (Jones and Ferneau 2002:217). The points include large, contracting-stemmed types typical of the Middle Period, as well as Late Period small, leaf-shaped points, which likely reflect the introduction of the bow and arrow.

Late Period (1250 CE–Historic Contact)
Late period sites are marked by small, finely worked projectile points, such as Desert side-notched and Cottonwood points, as well as temporally diagnostic shell beads. Although shell beads were typical of coastal sites, trade brought many of these maritime artifacts to inland locations, especially during the latter part of the Late period (Jones et al. 2007).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 380, Packet Page 383 Natural and Cultural Setting
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 11
Common artifacts identified at Late Period sites include bifacial bead drills, bedrock mortars, hopper mortars, lipped and cupped Olivella shell beads, and steatite disk beads. The presence of beads and bead drills suggest that low-level bead production was widespread throughout the Central Coast region (Jones et al. 2007).

Unlike the large Middle period shell middens, Late period sites are more frequently singlecomponent deposits. There are also more inland sites, with fewer and less visible sites along the Pacific shore during the Late period. However, one Late Period shell midden has been identified on the coast in Morro Bay (CA-SLO-23). The settlement pattern and dietary reconstructions indicate a lesser reliance on marine resources than observed for the Middle and Middle-Late Transition periods, as well as an increased preference for deer and rabbit (Jones 1995). An increase in sites with bedrock mortars during the Late period further suggests that nuts and seeds began to take on a more significant dietary role (Jones et al. 2007).

Ethnographic Setting
The project site lies in an area traditionally occupied by the Ohlone (or Costanoan) people. Ohlone territory extends along the California coast from the point where the San Joaquin and Sacramento rivers merge into the San Francisco Bay to Point Sur. Their inland boundary was limited to the interior Coast Ranges (Kroeber 1925: 462). The Ohlone language belongs to the Penutian family, with several distinct dialects throughout the region (Kroeber 1925: 462). It is divided into eight regional dialects: Karkin, Chochenyo, Ramaytush, Awaswas, Taymen, Mutsun, Rumsen, and Chalon (Jones 2015)
The pre-contact Ohlone were semi-sedentary, with a settlement system characterized by base camps and seasonal reserve camps composed of tule reed houses with thatched roofs made of matted grass (Schick 1994, Skowronek 1998). Just outside base camps, large sweat houses were built into the ground near stream banks used for spiritual ceremonies and possibly hygiene (Schick 1994, Jones 2015). Villages were divided into small polities, each of which was governed by a chief responsible for settling disputes, acting as a war leader during times of conflict, and supervising economic and ceremonial activities (Skowronek 1998, Kroeber 1925: 468). Social organization appeared flexible to ethnographers and any sort of social hierarchy was not apparent to mission priests (Skowronek 1998).

Archaeological investigations inform Ohlone mortuary rituals. Cemeteries were set away from villages and visited during the annual Mourning Anniversary (Leventhal and DiGiuseppe 2009).

Ceremonial human grave offerings might include Olivella beads, as well as tools like drills, mortars, pestles, hammerstones, bone awls, and utilized flakes (Leventhal and DiGiuseppe 2009). Ohlone mythology included animal characterization and animism, which was the basis for several creation narratives. Ritually burying animals, such as a wolf, squirrel, deer, mountain lion, gray fox, elk, badger, grizzly bear, blue goose, and bat ray, was commonly practiced. Similar to human burials, ceremonial offerings were added to ritual animal graves like shell beads, ornaments, and exotic goods (Kroeber 1925, Field and Leventhal 2003, Jones 2010).

Ohlone subsistence strategies were based on hunting, gathering, and fishing (Kroeber 1925: 467, Skowronek 1998). Larger animals, like bears, might be avoided, but smaller game was hunted and snared on a regular basis (Schick 1944: 17). Like the rest of California, the acorn was an important staple and was prepared by leaching acorn meal in openwork baskets and in holes dug into the sand (Kroeber 1925: 467). The Ohlone also practiced controlled burning to facilitate plant growth (Kroeber 1925: 467, Skowronek 1998). During specific seasons or in times of drought, the reserve

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 381, Packet Page 384 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
12 camps would be utilized for gathering seasonal food and accessing food storage (Schick 1994). Using nets and gorge hooks, the Ohlone fished from tule reed canoes (Schick 1994: 16–17). Mussels were a particularly important food resource. Sea mammals such as sea lions and seals were hunted, and beached whales were exploited (Kroeber 1925: 467).

Seven Franciscan missions were built in Ohlone territory in the late 1700s, and all members of the Ohlone group were eventually brought into the mission system (Kroeber 1925: 462, Skowronek 1998). After the establishment of the missions, Ohlone population dwindled from roughly 10,000 people in 1770 to 1,300 by 1814 (Skowronek 1998). In 1973, the population of people with Ohlone descent was estimated at fewer than 300. The descendants of the Ohlone united in 1971 and have since arranged political and cultural organizations to revitalize aspects of their culture (Skowronek 1998).

Post-Contact Setting
Post-Contact history for the state of California is generally divided into three periods: the Spanish Period (1769–1822), Mexican Period (1822–1848), and American Period (1848–present). Although Spanish, Russian, and British explorers visited the area for brief periods between 1529 and 1769, the Spanish Period in California begins with the establishment in 1769 of a settlement at San Diego and the founding of Mission San Diego de Alcalá, the first of 21 missions constructed between 1769 and 1823. Independence from Spain in 1821 marks the beginning of the Mexican Period, and the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, ending the Mexican-American War, signals the beginning of the American Period when California became a territory of the United States.

Spanish Period (1769-1822)
Spanish explorers made sailing expeditions along the coast of California between the mid-1500s and mid-1700s. Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo in 1542 led the first European expedition to observe what was known by the Spanish as Alta (upper) California. For more than 200 years, Cabrillo and other Spanish, Portuguese, British, and Russian explorers sailed the Alta California coast and made limited inland expeditions, but they did not establish permanent settlements (Bean 1968; Rolle 2003). The Spanish crown laid claim to Alta California based on the surveys conducted by Cabríllo and Vizcaíno (Bancroft 1885; Gumprecht 1999).

By the 18th century, Spain developed a three-pronged approach to secure its hold on the territory and counter against other foreign explorers. The Spanish established military forts known as presidios, as well as missions and pueblos (towns) throughout Alta California. The presidio at Monterey and Mission San Carlos Borromeo were established in 1770, although the mission was moved a year later to present-day Carmel (California Missions Foundation 2017; San Carlos Cathedral 2019). Monterey served as the capital of Baja and Alta California in 1776 until 1803. The pueblo of Monterey grew as residents expanded outside the royal presidio with Spanish soldiers marrying, raising families or retiring (Crane 1991; City of Monterey Museums n.d.).

Construction of missions and associated presidios was a major emphasis during the Spanish Period in California to integrate the Native American population into Christianity and communal enterprise.

Incentives were also provided to bring settlers to pueblos or towns; just three pueblos were established during the Spanish Period, only two of which were successful and remain as California cities (San José and Los Angeles).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 382, Packet Page 385 Natural and Cultural Setting
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 13
Spain began making land grants in 1784, typically to retiring soldiers, although the grantees were only permitted to inhabit and work the land. The land titles technically remained property of the Spanish king (Livingston 1914).

Mexican Period (1822-1848)
Several factors kept growth within Alta California to a minimum, including the threat of foreign invasion, political dissatisfaction, and unrest among the indigenous population. After more than a decade of intermittent rebellion and warfare, New Spain won independence from Spain in 1821. In 1822, the Mexican legislative body in California ended isolationist policies designed to protect the Spanish monopoly on trade, and decreed California ports open to foreign merchants (Dallas 1955).

In 1822, residents of Alta California received word that Mexico had won its war for independence from Spain. At this time, the pueblo of Monterey had a population of several hundred and the newly established Mexican government decreed the California ports open to increased trade with foreigners under the constitution of 1824 (Bean 1968; Crane 1991).

Hallmarks of the Mexican Period in California are the secularization of mission lands, which was fully accomplished by 1836, the issuance of large land grants, and cattle ranching for the hide and tallow trade. Extensive land grants were established in the interior during the Mexican Period, in part to increase the population inland from the more settled coastal areas where the Spanish had first concentrated their colonization efforts. The secularization of the missions following Mexico’s independence from Spain resulted in the subdivision of former mission lands and establishment of many additional ranchos. Commonly, former soldiers and well-connected Mexican families were the recipients of these land grants, which now included the title to the land (Graffy 2010). As Mexico opened California to international trade, Monterey became the primary port of entry, and the exportation of hide and tallow was one of the most important parts of the economy (City of Monterey Museums n.d.).

American Period (1848 - Present)
The United States went to war with Mexico in 1846. During the first year of the war, John C.

Fremont traveled from Monterey to Los Angeles with reinforcements for Commodore Stockton, and evaded Californian soldiers in Santa Barbara’s Gaviota Pass by taking the route over the San Marcos grade instead (Kyle 2002). The war ended in 1848 with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, ushering California into its American Period.

The Gold Rush brought a multitude of new settlers to California beginning in 1848, and in 1850 Monterey became one of the first counties in the newly-established state, with the city of Monterey serving as the original county seat until 1872 (City of Monterey Museums n.d.).

Local History
Although it was no longer the capital, in 1850, Monterey was established as the county seat and supplied early miners for the first couple of years of the Gold Rush before new boom towns grew around the southern mines of Gold Country. Gold was not the only attraction for those who settled in Monterey. The wealth of sea life around the Monterey Peninsula, from migrating whales to abalone and squid, supported a community of Chinese fisherman. By 1853, they had established a vibrant fishing village and were soon joined by Portuguese whalers from the Azores Islands who made their livelihoods in shore whaling.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 383, Packet Page 386 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
14 By the mid-1850s, the Gold Rush had ended for Monterey, the army installment in Monterey had moved to San Francisco, and former Rancho lands that made up large portions of the area were being sold off. In 1872, Monterey lost its county seat to the City of Salinas. As a result, the formerly bustling commercial capital languished and appeared to be reduced to a fishing village.

The area, however, slowly started to develop following the establishment of the first railroad in 1874. Shortly thereafter, Charles Crocker, one of California’s railroad barons, took over the railroad.

He had a vision to create a destination for his railroad, with a luxury resort at the center. Hotel Del Monte was established in 1880, and spanned several acres, and included gardens, parkland, polo grounds, and a racetrack (Copeland N.d.). The hotel land was vast, spanning over 7,000 acres (Monterey Herald 2017). The opening of the hotel marked the beginning of Monterey’s international tourism industry. Tourism in the area continued following the opening of the hotel. In addition to the luxury hotel, Monterey attracted people for being a quaint town with charming adobes as well as its desirable seaside location.

In addition to fishing and tourism, Monterey also attracted artists. In 1874 Jules Tavernier opened a studio in the area and invited his friends, initiating an art colony that included Fannie Osborne and Robert Louis Stevenson. At the turn of the twentieth century, the military also returned to Monterey, making the city’s continued expansion. Following the Spanish-American War, the need for more presence on the west coast prompted the Army to establish the Monterey Military Reservation on the same site as the 1846 Army installation. In 1904 it was renamed the Presidio of Monterey in honor of the original presidio at Monterey. The presidio continues to provide instruction and training today.

The local economy was further transformed in 1902 when the first fish packing and canning operation opened on Ocean View (present day Cannery Row). In the following years fishery experts introduced the boat and net system increasing salmon and sardine catches. Canning expert Knut Hovden arrived in Monterey and introduced methods to mechanize the canning operation, further spurring the local economy. By 1940, nineteen canneries harvested over 250,000 tons per season on Cannery Row, making Monterey the “Sardine Capital of the World.” By the late 1940s, however, sardine harvests diminished signaling the end of the signature industry.

Beginning in the 1920s, with increased automobile ownership and the expansion of local roads, more Americans were able to travel, including to Monterey. In order to accommodate a variety of travelers, motor courts and autocamps were developed along commonly traveled routes outside downtowns, allowing families to stay in small cottages or tents including along North Fremont Street though Monterey.

In 1919, the Del Monte Properties Company acquired the Hotel Del Monte and the first incarnation of the Monterey County Fair took place on the racetrack and polo grounds in 1930 (Monterey Herald 2017). The County Fair lapsed for several years during the great depression, but newly legalized horse racing in 1936 spurred the return of the fair, offering another tourism attraction for the area.

Monterey’s tourism continued to flourish through the war years. Following the end of World War II, the city continued to expand and adapt for growing tourism. In the 1960s, a national movement to revitalize downtowns through renewal projects arrived in Monterey. Swaths of older parts of Old Town Monterey were demolished while nearby Fort Ord was expanded. The result was a new plaza near the foot of Fisherman’s Wharf that connected to Cannery Row, which included the adaptive reuse of old industrial canning buildings for new commercial uses.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 384, Packet Page 387 Natural and Cultural Setting
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 15
The Monterey Bay Aquarium opened in 1984. In 1992, Monterey Bay was designated a National Marine Sanctuary. Fort Ord closed in 1994, and a portion was quickly redeveloped for the creation of the California State University Monterey Bay. The Presidio of Monterey also began to house the Defense Language Institute (DLI), specializing in graduate degrees in international studies and a center for foreign languages. The former Hotel Del Monte now houses the Naval Postgraduate School. Today, the ecological and environmental sectors, and educational facilities along with tourism are the primary drivers for the local economy (Copeland, nd.).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 385, Packet Page 388 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
16 4 Methods
This section presents the methods for each task completed during the preparation of this study.

Background and Archival Research
Archival Research
Rincon completed background and archival research in support of this study in June 2022. A variety of primary and secondary source materials were consulted. Sources included, but were not limited to, historical maps, aerial photographs, and written histories of the area. The following sources were utilized to develop an understanding of the project site and its context:
ƒ Monterey County Assessor’s Office
ƒ Historical aerial photographs accessed via NETR Online ƒ Historical aerial photographs accessed via University of California, Santa Barbara Library FrameFinder
ƒ Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Maps accessed through the Los Angeles County Public Library ƒ Historical U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps
ƒ City of Monterey Building Permits Accessed via the City of Monterey Building and Safety Services of the Community Development Department
ƒ Historical newspaper clippings obtained from Newspapers.com, ProQuest Historical Newspapers.com, and the California Digital Newspaper Collection ƒ Various historical records via Ancestry.com
ƒ Various historical records provided by the City of Monterey California Historical Resources Information System Records Search
On June 17, 2022, Rincon Archaeologist, Elaine Foster, MA, RPA, conducted a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) at Sonoma State University (Appendix A). The NWIC is the official state repository for cultural resources records and reports for the county in which the project falls. The purpose of the records search was to identify previously recorded cultural resources, as well as previously conducted cultural resources studies within the project site and a 0.25-mile radius surrounding it. Rincon also reviewed the NRHP, the CRHR, the California Historical Landmarks list, and the Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD), as well as its predecessor the California State Historic Property Data (HPD) File. Additionally, Rincon reviewed the Archaeological Determination of Eligibility (ADOE) list.

Sacred Lands File Search
Rincon contacted the Native American Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on June 20, 2022, to request a search of the Sacred Lands File (SLF), as well as a contact list of Native American groups and/or individuals culturally affiliated with the project area who may have knowledge of

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 386, Packet Page 389 Methods
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 17
cultural resources in the APE (Appendix B). The City conducted AB 52 consultation for an Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project in 2020 to 2021.

The City reinitiated efforts for AB 52 consultation for preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and initiated efforts for SB 18 consultation in July 2022. On July 26, 2022 the City sent letters to Native American contacts in the area to request information on potential cultural resources in the project vicinity that may be impacted by the proposed project’s development. The City received one response from The KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan noting that the project could impact previously unknown cultural resources and recommended cultural sensitivity training for pre-project personnel as well as a cultural monitor during ground disturbance. The City received no other responses. Rincon did not conduct additional Native American outreach.

Appendix B provides the results of the outreach efforts.

Field Survey
Built Environment Survey
Under the direction of Rincon Architectural Historian JulieAnn Murphy, Laura Maldonado, MA, conducted a built environment survey of the project site on June 20, 2022. The built environment resources within the project site, including buildings, structures and associated landscape elements, were visually inspected. Pursuant to California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) Guidelines (California OHP 1995), properties over 45 years of age were evaluated for inclusion in the NRHP, CRHR, and local listing and recorded on California Department of Parks (DPR) 523 series forms.

Overall condition and integrity of these resources were documented and assessed. Site characteristics and conditions were documented using notes and digital photographs which are maintained by the Rincon Monterey office.

Archaeological Resources Survey
Rincon Archaeologist Laura Maldonado, MA, conducted a survey of the project site on June 20, 2022. Because the project site is paved and there is little to no ground exposure, survey was limited to a visual examination of exposed ground and landscaping for evidence of archaeological materials including artifacts (e.g., flaked stone tools, tool-making debris, stone milling tools, ceramics, fireaffected rock), ecofacts (marine shell and bone), soil discolorations that might indicate the presence of cultural midden, soil depressions, and features indicative of the former presence of structures of buildings (e.g., standing exterior walls, postholes, foundations) or historic debris (e.g., metal, glass, ceramics). Ground disturbances such as animal burrows were also visually inspected. Site characteristics and survey conditions were documented using field records and a digital camera.

Copies of the survey notes and digital photographs are maintained by the Rincon Monterey office.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 387, Packet Page 390 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
18 5 Findings
Known Cultural Resources Studies
The CHRIS records search and background research identified 15 cultural resources studies within

0.25 mile of the project site (Appendix A). Of these studies, none include a portion of the project site and three include areas directly adjacent to the project site (S-027043, S-033677, and S-045829).

Approximately zero percent of the project site has been studied or surveyed. Known studies that occurred adjacent to the project site are discussed in further detail below.

Study S-027043
Study S-027043, Archaeological Survey Report for the North Fremont Storm Drain Improvement Project, was prepared in 2003 by Cordelia Sutch and John Holson of Pacific Legacy, Inc. (Sutch and Holson 2003). The study documented an archaeological survey undertaken for the proposed North Fremont Street Storm Drain Improvements between Del Monte Lake down Palo Verde Avenue to the intersection of Fairground Road and Airport Road in the City of Monterey. The study did not identify any cultural resources within the project area.

Study S-033677
In 1999, Mary Doane and Trudy Haversat of Archaeological Consulting prepared a preliminary archaeological reconnaissance report, Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Marina Coast Water District Recycled Water Pipeline Project, Monterey County, California, for Denise Duffy & Associates (Doane and Haversat 1999). The study was prepared to support a proposed pipeline, which ran from the Monterey Wastewater Treatment Facility to Reservation Road northeast of the City of Marina south to the City of Monterey. The report identified no cultural resources within the project area.

Study S-045829
Study S-045829, Phase 1 Archaeological Survey for the North Fremont Boulevard Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Project, was prepared by Mary Doane and Gary Breschini in 2014 (Doane and Breschini 2014). The study recorded North Fremont Street in Monterey and Seaside for the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle path. The project did not identify any cultural resources within the project area.

Known Cultural Resources
The CHRIS records search and background research identified no cultural resources within a 0.25 mile of the project site.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 388, Packet Page 391 Findings
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 19
Aerial Imagery and Historical Topographic Maps
Review
Rincon completed a review of historical topographic maps and aerial imagery to ascertain the development history of the project site. Historical topographic maps from 1913 to 1932 depict the project site as undeveloped land east of central Monterey and north of the fairgrounds with North Fremont Street running through the area (NETR Online 2022; USGS 2022). By 1941, historical topographic maps depict residential development to the north of the project site (NETR Online 2022; USGS 2022). Aerial imagery from 1941 and 1945 confirms the presence of residential development north of the project site and shows four small motor courts along North Fremont Street and the fairgrounds south of the project site (UCSB 2022). By 1956, the surrounding area developed further with residential developments south and west of the project area and greater commercial development along North Fremont Street (NETR Online 2022). Approximately ten motor courts and motels were constructed, including the subject property, and the older motor courts expanded into motels. Since 1968, the area has seen very little changes and development. Some of the older motels were torn down for new commercial uses, and the fairgrounds racetrack was converted to a golf course (NETR Online 2022).

Sacred Land File Search
On July 25, 2022 the NAHC responded to Rincon’s AB 52/SB 18 contacts request and SLF request, stating that the results of the SLF search were positive. See Appendix B for the NAHC response, including Tribal contacts list(s). The City of Monterey sent letters on July 26, 2022 to 10 Native American contacts in the area to request information on potential cultural resources in the project site vicinity that may be impacted by the proposed project’s development. The City received one response from The KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan noting that the project could impact previously unknown cultural resources and recommended cultural sensitivity training for pre-project personnel as well as a cultural monitor during ground disturbance. The City received no other responses. Appendix B provides the results of the NAHC contacts request and SLF request.

Survey Results
Built Environment Resources
The following section summarizes the results of all background research and fieldwork as they pertain to built environment resources that may qualify as historical resources. The field work and background research resulted in the identification of one historic-age property within the project site, Casa Verde Motel at 2101 Fremont Street (Figure 5). This property was recorded and evaluated for historical resources eligibility on DPR series forms, which are included in Appendix C and summarized below.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 389, Packet Page 392 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
20 Figure 5 Project Site, 2101 Fremont Street, Monterey, California

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 390, Packet Page 393 Findings
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 21
2101 Fremont Street
Physical Description
The 2101 Fremont Street property is located on a corner parcel (APN 013-112-045) at the intersection of North Fremont Street and Casa Verde Way in northwestern Monterey near Sand City and Seaside. The property is developed with a one-story motel. Known as the Casa Verde Inn, the building features a U-shaped plan with 18 guestrooms that open towards a paved parking lot that fronts North Fremont Street (Figure 6). A restaurant occupies the southwestern corner of the building and office and manager living quarters are at the southeastern corner. The motel and restaurant are vacant and are no longer in use.

Constructed between 1945 and 1949, the motel is built with elements of the Minimal Traditional and Revival Styles typical of the period and has a stucco exterior capped by a gable roofline sheathed in composition shingles with an overhanging eave, creating a covered walkway below. The eaves are supported by thin, square wooden posts and the walkway is concrete (Figure 7). Each guest room has a single flush or paneled wood door, a non-original vinyl window, and a window air conditioning unit built into the wall below the window (Figure 8). Added in 1981, the office has nonoriginal vinyl vertical sliding sash windows, a wood paneled Dutch door, and a sign which states “Office” (Figure 9).

The façade of the restaurant is the result of a 1984 renovation to the original caretaker’s quarters and office. The restaurant has a non-original hipped roof clad in wood shingles which creates a covered walkway on the east elevation supported by square wood posts (Figure 10). The entrance is on the south elevation with non-original double wood paneled doors covered by a canvas awning.

Fenestration also includes a large “greenhouse window.” At the rear of the restaurant is the former kidney bean-shaped swimming pool constructed in 1959; it is now infilled and no longer in use.

Landscaping includes brick planters throughout the site along walkways and open areas. At the center of the parking lot along North Fremont Street is a large brick planter with an original vertical sign stating “Casa Verde Inn Caruso’s Restaurant.”

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 391, Packet Page 394 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
22 Figure 6 2101 Fremont Street, East Elevation of restaurant and sign, Facing Southwest Figure 7 West and South Elevations of guest rooms, Facing Northeast

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 392, Packet Page 395 Findings
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 23
Figure 8 Guest room showing entrance and window, West Elevation, Facing East Figure 9 West and South Elevations of office, Facing Northeast

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 393, Packet Page 396 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
24 Figure 10 East and South Elevations of restaurant connected to the motel, Facing West Property History
Site Development
Before the construction of the motel building at 2101 North Fremont Street, the subject property was undeveloped through the 1920s. By the early 1940s, the subject property appears to have been developed with one larger single-family house and three smaller adjacent cottage structures that continued along North Fremont Street, and possibly served as an early motor court for auto travelers.

By 1945, the earlier buildings on the subject property were replaced by the current motel building, first known as the Twin Oaks Motel (UCSB FrameFinder 1941, 1945 and City of Monterey Building Permits). At that time, the project site was larger and included the adjacent parcel to the north and was comprised of two operations – the U-shaped motel building fronting North Fremont Street and a large, paved lot on the north side of the building that served as an auto court called the Twin Oaks Court (The Californian 1949).

Following World War II, and the expansion of the federal highway system, motor courts were replaced with motels which could accommodate the growing number of travelers. During that time, the motel became the model for lodging in post-war America with a combination accommodation of the automobile and guests with guestrooms generally opening directly onto parking spaces (Survey LA 2017). Typical of the building type, Twin Oaks Motel featured a U-shaped building arranged around a central parking area with a manager’s quarters, office, and dining area at the southwest corner of the property. Though an original architect could not be identified, its design was typical of

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 394, Packet Page 397 Findings
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 25
the period, with elements the Minimal Traditional and Revival styles widely used throughout the United States for motel design, especially in suburban settings, between 1935 and 1950. Motels with dining areas were also common during this period as motels were generally constructed in areas outside of downtowns that lacked amenities.

The motel served motoring families vacationing in Monterey or attending the Monterey County Fairgrounds south of the property, which was bringing in record crowds by 1947 (Monterey Herald 2017). The motel underwent several alterations throughout its history. In 1949, the motel was altered and repaired, the extent of which were not identified in city building permits. By 1952, the motel was owned by C. Foley and received a second renovation. Designed by architect Roger C.

Poole, the renovation included the addition of six hotel rooms, designed with small kitchens, as well as a motel laundry room, likely to compete with other establishments catering to tourists in the area. Historic aerials from 1956 show that North Fremont Street had been heavily developed with other motels fronting the fairgrounds.

Improvements continued in the following years. In 1959, a two-story addition and kidney beanshaped pool were constructed to the rear of the manager living quarters. The addition and pool were designed by Wallace Holm and Associates architecture firm (City of Monterey Building Permit 1959). Based out of Monterey, Holm’s work later focused on developing master plans, including those for Monterey Peninsula College and Laguna Seca. A 1960 Sanborn map shows the motel retained the same general configuration, and included the former auto court to the north, then noted as a trailer park.

In 1966 the living quarters, office, and dining area were converted to a restaurant named Caruso’s Corner Pizza (City of Monterey Building Permit 1966). As the area continued to develop for tourism, permanent restaurants gave travelers more food options on their trips. The conversion included a new storefront with large picture windows and glass doors. A flat overhanging eave was added to the front and east elevation of the former living quarters and a sign was designed and erected just outside the front door of the newly established restaurant. By this time, the trailer park was removed and served as a surface parking lot for the restaurant.

In 1972, the motel was renamed the Casa Verde Inn, and a new sign was designed for the rebranding (City of Monterey Building Permit 1972). According to County Assessor records, the current parcel boundary was in place by 1976 when the former trailer park and surface parking lot was developed with the current apartment buildings (Monterey County Assessor).

Between 1981 and 1982, the current office and living quarters were constructed at the southeast corner of the property. Three of the adjacent rooms were altered to connect to the living quarters (City of Monterey Building Permits 1981 and 1982). The plans were designed by Carmel-based architect James C. Heisinger and the building was constructed by S.A. Balbo Construction. In 1984, the restaurant was altered again with a new storefront with a hipped roof overhang, greenhouse window, double door entrance, and canvas awning (City of Monterey Building Permits 1981 to 1984). Civil engineer, Robert McBroome Jr., designed the alteration for owner, Kuar Pal Singh. In 1996, the windows were altered (City of Monterey Building Permit 1996). Aerial images indicate that the pool was infilled in the early 2000s. Since then, the building has remained largely unchanged. The motel and restaurant are vacant and no longer in use.

Historical Resources Evaluation
The property at 2101 North Fremont Street is recommended ineligible for listing in the NRHP, CRHR, and as local historic resource, under any significance criteria.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 395, Packet Page 398 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
26 Developed between 1945-1949, the subject property is typical of the commercial development of Monterey during this period. Following the establishment of the Monterey County Fairgrounds in 1936 and subsequent increase in tourism after World War II, the property was one of several motels constructed along North Fremont Street during this era. Research for this study did not reveal that the subject property was individually significant within this context or any other historic trend important to the region, state, or nation. The property is recommended ineligible for listing in the NRHP and the CRHR under Criterion A/1.

The property has had a number of owners and operators since its construction. Research conducted for the present study did not identify any individual connected with the property has made significant historical contributions; therefore, the property is recommended ineligible for listing to the NRHP and the CRHR under Criterion B/2.
2101 Fremont Street was constructed between 1945 and 1949 as motel. Built with elements of the Minimal Traditional and Revival Styles, it was one of many properties designed with the same characteristics during this period. It does not embody distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. Furthermore, the property has been substantially altered since its construction between 1945 and 1949 with the addition of a two-story section at the rear of the manager living quarters in 1959, a complete alteration of the façade of the living quarters and dining area into a restaurant in 1966 and 1984, the addition of the office in 1981, and the replacement of all windows in 1996. As a result, the building has diminished integrity of material and design.

The subject property has undergone several alterations throughout its history each designed and constructed by various architects and building contractors. The original architect and contractor of the motel were not identified during research. The additions and alterations from the other architects and contractors are minor additions and not representative of their respective works. It also is not the work of a master nor does it possess high artistic value. Therefore, 2021 North Fremont Street is recommended ineligible for listing to the NRHP and CRHR under Criterion C/3.

Finally, a review of available evidence and records search results did not indicate the property may yield important information about prehistory or history. The property is recommended ineligible for listing to the NRHP and CRHR under Criterion D/4.

Because the subject property is not eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR, it is also ineligible for listing as a local historic resource under H-1 Landmark Overlay Zoning. The property is also recommended ineligible for listing as a local historic resource under H-2 Historic Resource Overlay zoning. The subject property at 2101 North Fremont Street, as outlined above, does not reflect any local importance unique to Monterey or the Monterey Peninsula and was a typical motel development common during the period and is a common building type that was repeated across the United States. Finally, the subject property is not eligible for inclusion in a local historic district under criterion H-D District Overlay Zoning.

Archaeological Resources
The following section summarizes the results and background research and field work as they pertain to archaeological resources that may qualify as historical resources and/or unique archaeological resources.

No archaeological resources were identified during the field survey. Ground visibility was poor (approximately 0 percent) with approximately 5 percent exposure. Approximately 95 percent of the

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 396, Packet Page 399 Findings
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 27
project site has been paved and is partially overlain by the existing building. Additionally, the areas of exposed ground located along the front of the building are landscaped planters and have therefore been disturbed. The soils within the landscaped area consist of compacted dark brown and gray loam with gravel inclusions. Vegetation consisted of ornamental plants and shrubs. The project site has been heavily disturbed from construction of the building, the paving around the building, and the landscaping.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 397, Packet Page 400 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
28 6 Impacts Analysis and Conclusions
The impact analysis included here is organized based on the cultural resources thresholds included in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G: Environmental Checklist Form:
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
Threshold A broadly refers to historical resources. To more clearly differentiate between archaeological and built environment resources, we have chosen to limit analysis under Threshold A to built environment resources. Archaeological resources, including those that may be considered historical resources pursuant to Section 15064.5 and those that may be considered unique archaeological resources pursuant to Section 21083.2, are considered under Threshold B.

Historical Built Environment Resources
The field survey and background research identified one historic-period property at 2101 North Fremont Street with one building – the Casa Verde Inn. 2101 North Fremont Street was recorded and evaluated for eligibility in the NRHP, CRHR, and as a local resource. As a result of this study, 2101 North Fremont Street is recommended ineligible for listing in the NRHP, CRHR, and as a local resource and is therefore not considered a historical resource for the purposes of CEQA. The proposed development would not result in a significant adverse impact as defined by CEQA and would result in no impact to historical resources pursuant to CEQA.

Historical and Unique Archaeological Resources
This study did not identify any archaeological resources or archaeological deposits in the project site. The lack of surface evidence of archaeological materials does not preclude their subsurface existence. However, the absence of substantial prehistoric or historic-period archaeological remains within the immediate vicinity, along with the existing level of disturbance in the project site, suggest there is a low potential for encountering intact subsurface archaeological deposits. There is a potential that unknown buried archaeological resources could be encountered during project ground disturbance. In the event of an unanticipated discovery, impacts to unknown archaeological resources would be potentially significant and mitigation measures would be required. Rincon presents the following recommended mitigation measure for unanticipated discoveries during construction. With adherence to this measure, Rincon recommends a finding of less-thansignificant impact with mitigation for archaeological resources under CEQA.

Recommended Mitigation
Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 398, Packet Page 401 Impacts Analysis and Conclusions
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 29
In the unlikely event that archaeological resources are unexpectedly encountered during grounddisturbing activities, work in the immediate area should be halted and an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for archeology (National Park Service 1983) should be contacted immediately to evaluate the find. If the find is prehistoric, then a Native American representative should also be contacted to participate in the evaluation of the find.

If necessary, the evaluation may require preparation of a treatment plan and archaeological testing for CRHR eligibility. If the discovery proves to be eligible for the CRHR and cannot be avoided by the modified project, additional work, such as data recovery excavation, may be warranted to mitigate any significant impacts to historical resources.

Worker’s Environmental Awareness Training
The project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist who meets or exceeds the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for archaeology to conduct Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training for archaeological sensitivity for all construction personnel prior to the commencement of ground disturbing activities. Archaeological sensitivity training shall include a description of the types of cultural resources, including tribal cultural resources, that may be encountered, cultural sensitivity issues, regulatory issues, and the proper protocol for treatment of the materials in the event of a find. The WEAP training document shall include materials which convey the information noted above and shall be maintained in an area accessible to all construction personnel so it may be reviewed regularly by construction staff. A Native American representative should be allowed to participate in the training if requested.

Evidence that the WEAP training has been completed shall be provided to the City of Monterey prior to the commencement of ground disturbing activities.

Human Remains
No human remains are known to be present within the project site. However, the discovery of human remains is always a possibility during ground disturbing activities. If human remains are found, the State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. In the event of an unanticipated discovery of human remains, the County Coroner must be notified immediately. If the human remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Coroner will notify the NAHC, which will determine and notify a MLD. The MLD has 48 hours from being granted site access to make recommendations for the disposition of the remains. If the MLD does not make recommendations within 48 hours, the landowner shall reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from subsequent disturbance.

With adherence to existing regulations, Rincon recommends a finding of less-than-significant impact to human remains under CEQA.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 399, Packet Page 402 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
30 7 References
Bickel, P. McW.
1978 Changing Sea Levels along the California Coast: Anthropological Implications. Journal of California Anthropology 5:6-20.

Boone, Cristie
2012 Integrating Zooarchaeology and Modeling: Trans-Holocene Fishing in Monterey Bay, California. University of California Santa Cruz Unpublished Dissertation.

Breschini, Gary S., and Trudy Haversat
1991 Early Holocene Occupation of the Central California Coast. In Hunter-Gatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California, edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Roger H. Colten, pp.125- 132. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Vol. 1. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

California Office of Historic Preservation
2011 “California Register and National Register: A Comparison (for purposes of determining eligibility for the California Register),” California Office of Historic Preservation Technical Assistance Series #6. Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento, California 2011 “California Register and National Register: A Comparison (for purposes of determining eligibility for the California Register),” California Office of Historic Preservation Technical Assistance Series #6. Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento, California 1995 Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento, California.

The Californian
1949 Advertisement. March 21. Accessed July 2022 through Newspapers.com.

Cartier, Robert
1989 Scotts Valley Chronology and Temporal Stratigraphy. SCA Proceedings 2:81-111.

Copeland, Denis
N.d. Monterey: History on the Half Shell. Accessed online at https://ncph.org/wpcontent/uploads/Monterey-History-on-the-Half-Shell.pdf. June 2022.

Doane, Mary and Gary S. Breschini
2014 Phase 1 Archaeological Survey for the North Fremont Boulevard Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Project, Monterey and Seaside, Monterey County, California. Archaeological Consulting, December 5.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 400, Packet Page 403 References
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 31
Doane, Mary and Trudy Haversat
1999 Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Marina Coast Water District Recycled Water Pipeline Project, Monterey County, California. Archaeological Consulting, November 4.

Field, Les W. and Alan Leventhal
2003 “What Must It Have Been Like!: Critical Considerations of Precontact Ohlone Cosmology as Interpreted through Central California Ethnohistory.” Wicazo SA Review 18(2): 95– 126.

Fitzgerald, Richard, and Judith Porcasi
1966 The Metcalf Site (CA-SCL-178) and its Place in Early Holocene California Prehistory. SCA Newsletter 37(4):27-31.

Glassow, Michael A., Lynn. H Gamble, Jennifer E. Perry, and Glenn S. Russell 2007 Prehistory of the Northern California Bight and the Adjacent Transverse Ranges. In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.

Greenwood, Roberta S.
1972 9000 Years of Prehistory at Diablo Canyon, San Luis Obispo County, California. San Luis Obispo Historical Society Occasional Paper No. 7.

HIldebandt, William
1997 The Relative Importance of Lacustrine and Estuarine Resources to Prehistoric HunterGatherer Populations: A View from Southern Santa Clara Valley, California. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 19(2):197-225.

Jones, Barbara L.
2010 “Mythic Implications of Faunal Assemblages from Three Ohlone Sites.” Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California.

Jones, Doug
2015 “Ritual and Religion in the Ohlone Cultural Area of Central California.” Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, San Jose State University, San Jose, California.

Jones, Terry L.
1993 Big Sur: A Keystone in Central California Cultural History. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 29(1):1–78.
1995 Transitions in Prehistoric Diet, Mobility, Exchange, and Social Organization along California’s Big Sur Coast. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 401, Packet Page 404 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
32 Jones, Terry L., and Jennifer A. Ferneau
2002 Deintensification along the Central California Coast. In Catalysts to Complexity, Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Terry L.

Jones, pp. 205-232. Perspectives in California Archaeology Vol. 6. Costen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Jones, Terry and Deborah Jones
1992 Elkhorn Slough Revisted: Reassessing the Chornology of CA-MNT-229. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 14(2):159-179.

Jones, Terry L., Richard T. Fitzgerald, Douglas J. Kennett, Charles Miksicek, John L. Fagan, John Sharp, and Jon M. Erlandson
2002 The Cross Creek Site and Its Implications for New World Colonization. American Antiquity 67:213–230.

Jones, Terry L., Nathan E. Stevens, Deborah A. Jones, Richard T. Fitzgerald, and Mark G. Hylkema 2007 The Central Coast: A Midlatitude Milieu. In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, pp. 125–146. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.

Jones, Terry L. and Georgie Waugh
1995 Central California Prehistory: A View from Little Pico Creek. Perspectives in California Archaeology 3. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. 1997 Climatic Consequences of Population Pragmatism? A Middle Holocene Prehistory of the Central Coast. In Archaeology of the California Coast During the Middle Holocene, edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Michael A. Glassow, pp. 111–128. Perspectives in California Archaeology 4. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Jones, D.A., C. Young, and W.R. Hildebrandt
2001 Phase II Archaeological Test Excavation at CA-SLO-832 and CA-SLO-1420, for the James Way/Price Street Road Improvement Project, San Luis Obispo County, Califonria. Far Western Anthropoloigcal Research Group, Davis, California. Submitted to California Department of Transportation, San Luis Obispo. Report on file with California Department of Transportation, San Luis Obispo.

Los Angeles, City of
2016 SurveyLA, Los Angeles Historic Resources Survey. Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement Context: Commercial Development, 1850-1980. Theme: Commercial Development and the Automobile, 1910-1970.

King, Chester D.
1981 The Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used in Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region Before A.D. 1804. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 402, Packet Page 405 References
Cultural Resources Assessment Report 33
1990 Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used in Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region Before A.D. 1804. Revised Ph.D. dissertation with a new preface and updated bibliography. In The Evolution of North American Indians, edited by David Hurst Thomas. Garland Publishing, New York.

Kroeber, Alfred J.
1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78.

Originally published 1925, Smithsonian Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Unabridged reprint 1976, Dover Publications, Inc. New York.

Lebow, C., M.C. Baloian, D.R. Harro, R.L. Mckim, C. Denardo, J. Onken, E. Romanski, and B.A. Price 2001 Final Report of Archaeological Investigations for Reaches 5B and 6 Coastal Branch Aqueduct, Phase II. Applied EarthWorks, Inc. Report on file, Central Coast Water Authority, Buellton, California.

Leventhal, Alan and Diane DiGiuseppe
2009 “Analysis of the Stone, Bone and Shell Artifacts from CA-SCL-869.” In Final Report on the Burial and Archaeological Data Recovery Program Conducted on a Portion of a Middle Period Ohlone Indian Cemetery, Katwáš Ketneyma Waréeptak (The Four Matriarchs Site) CA-SCL-869, Located at 5912 Cahalan Avenue, Fire Station # 12 San Jose, Santa Clara County, California. Ohlone Families Consulting Services. Submitted to City of San Jose Department of Public Works.

Levy, Richard
1978b “Costanoan.” Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, California, edited by R. F.

Heizer, pp 485–495. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Mills, Wayne, Michael F. Rondeau, and Terry L. Jones
2005 A Fluted Point from Nipomo, San Luis Obispo County, California. Journal of California and Great Basin Archaeology 25(2): 68-74.

Monterey, City of
Var. Building permits for the subject property at 2102 N. Fremont Street (APN 013-112-045) between 1949 and 1996.
2022 City Municipal Code. Chapter 38 Part III Article 15 Historic Properties. Ord. 3424 § 14, 2009.

Monterey Herald
2017 “Monterey Fairgrounds Steeped in History from its Roots Through Pop Music Festival Lore,” June 15. Accessed June 2022 at
https://www.montereyherald.com/2017/06/15/monterey-fairgrounds-steeped-inhistory-from-its-roots-through-pop-music-festival-lore/.

Moratto, Michael
1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 403, Packet Page 406 2101 North Fremont Street Hotel Project
34 National Park Service
1983 Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Department of the Interior, September 29.

NETR Online
2022 Various historical topographic maps and aerials of the project site and surrounding area between 1913 and 2018. Accessed June 2022, through historicaerials.com.

Schick, Grant W.
1994 “The Ohlone and the Oak Woodlands: Cultural adaptation in the Santa Clara Valley, Research Manuscript No. 4.” Santa Clara University. Santa Clara, California.

Skowronek, Russell K.
1998 “Sifting the Evidence: Perceptions of Life at the Ohlone (Costanoan) Missions of Alta California.” Ethnohistory 45: 675–708.

Sutch, Cordelia and John Holson
2003 Archaeological Survey Report for the North Fremont Storm Drain Improvement Project, City of Monterey, Monterey County. Pacific Legacy Incorporated, January.

University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)
2022 FrameFinder. Various historical topographic maps and aerials of the project site and surrounding area between 1941 and 1961. Accessed June 2022, through https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder/.

United States Geological Survey
2022 TopoViewer. Various topographical maps of the project site and surrounding area between 1913 and 2021. Accessed June 2022, through
https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/36.5964/-121.8625.

Wallace, William
1955 Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11:214–230.
1978 Post-Pleistocene Archaeology, 9000 to 2000 BCE In California, edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 25–36. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, W. C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C.

Wohlgemuth, Eric
1996 Resource Intensification in Prehistoric Central California: Evidence from Archaeobotanical Data. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 18(1):81- 103.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 404, Packet Page 407 Appendix A
California Historical Resources Information System Records Search

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 405, Packet Page 408 Report List
Report No. Year Title Affiliation Author(s) Resources Other IDs S-018816 1996 Preliminary Cultural Resources
Reconnaissance for Assessor's Parcel Number 013-031-26, Monterey, Monterey County, California Archaeological Consulting Anna Runnings and
Trudy Haversat
Submitter - AC Project 2426
S-022329 1999 Negative Archaeological Survey Report,
proposed fence replacement, 05-MON-01, PM R78.4-R81.2 CU 05-168 EA 05-0C4001 California Department of Transportation
Terry L. Joslin and Kelda Wilson
Caltrans - EA 05-0C4001
S-022657 2000 Phase 1 Archaeological Survey Along
Onshore Portions of the Global West Fiber Optic Cable Project Science Applications International Corporation
Izaak Sawyer, Laurie Pfeiffer, Karen Rasmussen, and Judy Berryman 27-000334, 27-000335, 27-000349, 27-000706, 27-000806, 27-000888, 27-001207, 27-001227, 27-001228, 27-001393, 27-001408, 27-001482, 41-000410, 43-000449, 44-000047, 44-000155, 44-000156, 44-000157, 44-000174, 44-000270 S-027043 2003 Archaeological Survey Report for the North Fremont Storm Drain Improvement Project, City of Monterey, Monterey County Pacific Legacy, Inc. Cordelia Sutch and John
Holson
S-031170 2005 Work Plan for Archaeological Survey and
Evaluation of the Naval Postgraduate School's Laboratory and Recreation Area, Monterey, California.

EDAW, Inc James H. Cleland and
Collin Tuthill
Agency Nbr - Navy Contract # N68711-04-D-3619
S-033677 1999 Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Marina Coast Water District Recycled Water Pipeline Project, Monterey County, California Archaeological Consulting Mary Doane and Trudy
Haversat
Submitter - AC Project 2783; Submitter - AC Project 2783B1; Submitter - AC Project 2783B2; Submitter - AC Project 2783C; Submitter - AC Project 2783D; Voided - S-22432; Voided - S-32385; Voided - S-32921; Voided - S-33994; Voided - S-33999 S-033677a 2006 Phase 1 Archaeological Reconnaissance for the Marina Coast Water District Regional Urban Water Augmentation Project, Recycled Water Component, Northern Segment, In Marina and Seaside, Monterey County, California Archaeological Consulting Mary Doane and Trudy
Haversat

Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 406, Packet Page 409 Report List
Report No. Year Title Affiliation Author(s) Resources Other IDs S-033677b 2007 Phase I Archaeological Reconnaissance for the Marina Coast Water District Regional Urban Water Augmentation Project, Recycled Water Component, in Marina, Ord Community, Seaside and Monterey, Monterey County, California (Revised May 22, 2007) Archaeological Consulting Mary Doane and Gary S.

Breshini
S-033677c 2006 Phase 1 Archaeological Reconnaissance for the Marina Coast Water District Regional Urban Water Augmentation Project, Recycled Water Component, in Marina, Ord Community, Seaside and Monterey, Monterey County, California Archaeological Consulting Mary Doane and Gary S.

Breschini
S-033677d VOIDED-duplicate of S-55378aS-033677e 2007 Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance for the Marina Coast Water District Well 34 Project, In Marina, Monterey County, California Archaeological Consulting Mary Doane and Gary S.

Breschini
S-045829 2014 Phase I Archaeological Survey for the North Fremont Boulevard Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Project, Monterey and Seaside, Monterey County, California Archaeological Consulting Mary Doane and Gary S.

Breschini
Submitter - AC Project 5035
S-047320 2016 Phase I Exploratory Geoarchaeological
Assessment of the Naval Support Activity (NSA) Monterey, California N62473-14-D1413 to 10 Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc.

Jack Meyer 27-000088, 27-000090, 27-000376,
27-000377, 27-000467, 27-000468, 27-000777, 27-001011, 27-001459, 27-002923, 27-002940, 27-003098, 27-003100, 27-003101, 27-003102, 27-003248 Submitter - N62473-14-D1413 to 10
S-052016 2016 Cultural Resource Records Search and Site Visit Results for Cellco Partnership and their Controlled Affiliates doing business as Verizon Wireless Candidate ‘Monterey Fairgrounds SC1’, 2000 Fairground Road, Monterey, Monterey County, California (letter report) HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc.

Cher L. Peterson, Carrie D. Wills, and Kathleen Crawford OTIS Report Number - FCC_2016_0701_003
S-052459 2016 3125-01 (Task 4) City of Monterey Montecito Park Project, Monterey County, California (letter report) Pacific Legacy, Inc. Lisa Holm Agency Nbr - 3125-
01 (Task 4)

Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 407, Packet Page 410 Appendix B
Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search Results

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 408, Packet Page 411 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

July 25, 2022
JulieAnn Murphy
Rincon Consultants, Inc.

Via Email to: [email protected]
Re: Native American Consultation, Pursuant to Senate Bill 18 (SB18), Government Codes §65352.3 and §65352.4, as well as Assembly Bill 52 (AB52), Public Resources Codes §21080.1, §21080.3.1 and §21080.3.2, 2101 N. Fremont Hotel EIR Project, Monterey County Dear Ms. Murphy:

Attached is a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within the boundaries of the above referenced counties or projects.

Government Codes §65352.3 and §65352.4 require local governments to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of avoiding, protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to cultural places when creating or amending General Plans, Specific Plans and Community Plans.

Public Resources Codes §21080.3.1 and §21080.3.2 requires public agencies to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of avoiding, protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to tribal cultural resources as defined, for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) projects.

The law does not preclude local governments and agencies from initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction. The NAHC believes that this is the best practice to ensure that tribes are consulted commensurate with the intent of the law.

Best practice for the AB52 process and in accordance with Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(d), is to do the following:

Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section.

The NAHC also recommends, but does not require that lead agencies include in their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential affect (APE), such as:

S
J
J
R

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Raymond C.

Hitchcock
Miwok/Nisenan

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 409, Packet Page 412

1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to:
x A listing of any and all known cultural resources have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites;
x Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; x Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and
x If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.

2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including:
x Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures.

All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code Section 6254.10.

3. The result of the Sacred Lands File (SFL) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission was positive. Please contact the tribes on the attached list for more information.

4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the potential APE; and

5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the potential APE.

Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS is not exhaustive, and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource.

This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event, that they do, having the information beforehand well help to facilitate the consultation process.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance we can assure that our consultation list remains current.

If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address:

[email protected].

Sincerely,
Cody Campagne
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 410, Packet Page 413 Amah Mutsun Tribal Band
Valentin Lopez, Chairperson
P.O. Box 5272
Galt, CA, 95632
Phone: (916) 743 - 5833
[email protected]
Costanoan
Northern Valley
Yokut
Amah MutsunTribal Band of
Mission San Juan Bautista
Irene Zwierlein, Chairperson
3030 Soda Bay Road
Lakeport, CA, 95453
Phone: (650) 851 - 7489
Fax: (650) 332-1526
[email protected]
Costanoan
Costanoan Rumsen Carmel
Tribe
Tony Cerda, Chairperson
244 E. 1st Street
Pomona, CA, 91766
Phone: (909) 629 - 6081
Fax: (909) 524-8041
[email protected]
Costanoan
Esselen Tribe of Monterey
County
Tom Little Bear Nason, Chairman
P. O. Box 95
Carmel Valley, CA, 93924
Phone: (831) 659 - 2153
Fax: (831) 659-0111
[email protected]
g
Costanoan
Esselen
Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of
Costanoan
Kanyon Sayers-Roods, MLD
Contact
1615 Pearson Court
San Jose, CA, 95122
Phone: (408) 673 - 0626
[email protected]
Costanoan
Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of
Costanoan
Ann Marie Sayers, Chairperson
P.O. Box 28
Hollister, CA, 95024
Phone: (831) 637 - 4238
[email protected]
Costanoan
Ohlone/Costanoan-Esselen
Nation
Louise Miranda-Ramirez,
Chairperson
P.O. Box 1301
Monterey, CA, 93942
Phone: (408) 629 - 5189
[email protected]
Costanoan
Esselen
Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom
Valley Band
Kenneth Woodrow, Chairperson
1179 Rock Haven Ct.

Salinas, CA, 93906
Phone: (831) 443 - 9702
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Mono
Kakoon Ta Ruk Band of
Ohlone-Costanoan Indians of
the Big Sur Rancheria
Isaac Bojorquez, Chairman
PO Box 541
Esparto, CA, 95627
Phone: (530) 723 - 2380
[email protected]
Ohlone
Rumsen Am:a Tur:ataj Ohlone
Dee Dee Ybarra, Chairperson
14671 Farmington Street
Hesperia, CA, 92345
Phone: (760) 403 - 1756
[email protected]
Costanoan
1 of 1
This list is current only as of the date of this document and is based on the information available to the Commission on the date it was produced. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is applicable only for consultation with Native American tribes under Government Code Sections 65352.3, 65352.4 et seq. and Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed 2101 N. Fremont Hotel EIR Project, Monterey County.

PROJ-2022-
004444
07/25/2022 12:44 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Tribal Consultation List
Monterey County
7/25/2022

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 411, Packet Page 414 KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan Indians of the Big Sur Rancheria PO Box 8355 Woodland, California 95776 p) 530-723-2380
July 20, 2022
Chris Schmidt
Senior Associate Planner
City of Monterey
570 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
RE: 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project
Dear Mr. Chris Schmidt,
Thank you for your project notification email/ letter dated June 24, 2022, regarding the proposed project site located at 2101 North Fremont Street, Monterey, CA. We appreciate your effort to contact us and wish to respond.

The Cultural Specialist has reviewed the project and concluded that it is within the aboriginal territories of the KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan Indians of the Big Sur Rancheria. Therefore, we have a cultural interest and authority in the proposed project area.

Based on the information provided, the Tribe has concerns that the project could impact previously unknown cultural resources. Please send us a copy of the draft environmental impact report for this project. The Tribe also recommends cultural sensitivity training for any pre-project personnel. We may also recommend including a cultural monitor during development and ground disturbance, including backhoe trenching and excavations throughout all phases of the project. In addition, we request that you incorporate KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan Indians of the Big Sur Rancheria’s Treatment Protocol into the measures for this project.

Should you have any questions, please contact the following individuals:

Isaac Bojorquez Lydia Bojorquez
Chairman Vice-Chairperson
Cell: (530) 723-2380 Cell: (530) 650-5943
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Please refer to identification number KKTR–06242022-01 in any correspondence concerning this project.

Thank you for providing us the opportunity to comment.

Shurruru,
Tribal Chairman
KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan
Indians of the Big Sur Rancheria
T ib l Ch i

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 412, Packet Page 415 11/9/22, 10:33 AM Mail - Christopher Schmidt - Outlook
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAQkAGIyMTRiYjJkLTU4NDctNDBjMy1hZGRiLWFkYjk3MmEwYzg1MwAQAKEGx4WHGqxAmrxgw4CnU04%3D 1/1 Re: 2101 North Fremont
Christopher Schmidt <[email protected]>
Fri 9/2/2022 1:48 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;Isaac Bojorquez <[email protected]>;Lydia Bojorquez <[email protected]> Cc: Kimberly Cole <[email protected]>
Hi Mr. Bojorquez and Ms. Bojorquez,
I hope all is well you.

I would just like to follow up on this item again; can you please forward the KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan Indians of the Big Sur Rancheria’s Treatment Protocol so it may be included in the City's environmental review effort for this project?
Thank you and have a nice aŌernoon and weekend.

Chris
Chris Schmidt (he/him)
Senior Associate Planner | City of Monterey
570 Pacific Street | Monterey, CA 93940
831-646-3885 (main) | 831-646-3910 (desk)
[email protected] | have your say | city website
Useful links:

How to Apply for Planning Permits
Land Use and Regulations
Historic Preservation
GIS Maps and Data
Building and Encroachment Permits
From: Kimberly Cole <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 8:14 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Christopher Schmidt <[email protected]>
Subject: 2101 North Fremont
Dear Mr. Bojorquez and Ms. Bojorquez,
Thank you for your July 20, 2022 leƩer regarding the 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project. Your leƩer menƟons the "KaKoon Ta Ruk Band of Ohlone-Costanoan Indians of the Big Sur Rancheria's Treatment Protocol". Could you please forward the protocol to me? Thank you for you consideraƟon.

Sincerely,
Kimberly Cole
[email protected]

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 413, Packet Page 416 Appendix C
California Department of Parks (DPR) 523 Series Forms

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 414, Packet Page 417 DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
State of California – The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 6Z
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date

P1. Other Identifier: Casa Verde Inn
*P2. Location: □ Not for Publication ■ Unrestricted *a. County: Monterey *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Seaside, CA Date: 1983 T15S, R01E, S28 S.B.B.M. c. Address: 2101 North Fremont Street City: Monterey Zip: 93940 d. UTM: Zone: xxx mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
e. Other Locational Data: APN: 013-112-045
*P3a. Description:

The 2101 Fremont Street property is located on a corner parcel (APN 013-112-045) at the intersection of North Fremont Street and Casa Verde Way in northwestern Monterey near Sand City and Seaside. The property is developed with a one-story motel. Known as the Casa Verde Inn, the building features a U-shaped plan with 18 guestrooms that open towards a paved parking lot that fronts North Fremont Street (Figure 6). A restaurant occupies the southwestern corner of the building and office and manager living quarters are at the southeastern corner. Constructed between 1945 and 1949, the motel is built with elements of the Minimal Traditional and Revival Styles typical of the period and has a stucco exterior capped by a gable roofline sheathed in composition shingles with an overhanging eave, creating a covered walkway below. The eaves are supported by thin, square wooden posts and the walkway is concrete (Figure 7). Each guest room has a single flush or paneled wood door, a nonoriginal vinyl window, and a window air conditioning unit built into the wall below the window (Figure 8). Added in 1981, the office has non-original vinyl vertical sliding sash windows, a wood paneled Dutch door, and a sign which states “Office” (Figure 9).

The façade of the restaurant is the result of a 1984 renovation to the original caretaker’s quarters and office. The restaurant has a non-original hipped roof clad in wood shingles which creates a covered walkway on the east elevation supported by square wood posts (Figure 10). The entrance is on the south elevation with non-original double wood paneled doors covered by a canvas awning. Fenestration also includes a large “greenhouse window.” At the rear of the restaurant is the former kidney bean-shaped swimming pool constructed in 1959; it is now infilled and no longer in use.

Landscaping includes brick planters throughout the site along walkways and open areas. At the center of the parking lot along N. Fremont Street is a large brick planter with an original vertical sign stating “Casa Verde Inn Caruso’s Restaurant.” *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP5. Hotel/motel
*P4. Resources Present: ■ Building □ Structure □ Object □ Site □ District □ Element of District □ Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo or Drawing P5b. Description of Photo:
2101 North Fremont Street, East elevation, View west.
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
■ Historic □ Prehistoric □ Both
Between 1945 and 1949 (UCSB 2022; City of
Monterey Building Permits)
*P7. Owner and Address:

Lakshmi Hotel Partners Inc
21405 Riverview Ct.

Salinas, CA 93908
*P8. Recorded by:

Laura Maldonado and Ashley Losco
Rincon Consultants
180 North Ashwood Avenue
Ventura, California 93003
*P9. Date Recorded:

June 2022
*P11. Report Citation:
2022. A. Losco, L. Maldonado, J. Murphy. 2101 North Fremont Hotel Project, Monterey, Monterey County, California. Rincon Consultants Project No. 22-13039. Report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, California. *Attachments: □ NONE ■ Location Map □ Sketch Map ■ Continuation Sheet ■ Building, Structure, and Object Record □ Archaeological Record □ District Record □ Linear Feature Record □ Milling Station Record □ Rock Art Record □ Artifact Record □ Photograph Record □ Other (List):

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 415, Packet Page 418 DPR 523J (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) * Required information

*Map Name: Seaside, California *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: 1983 State of California Natural Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LOCATION MAP Trinomial

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 416, Packet Page 419 *Resource Name or # 2101 North Fremont Street *NRHP Status Code 6Z

DPR 523B (9/2013) *Required information
State of California & The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
(This space reserved for official comments.)
B1. Historic Name: Twin Oaks Motel
B2. Common Name: Casa Verde Inn
B3. Original Use: Motel B4. Present Use: Motel
*B5. Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional Motel
*B6. Construction History:
1945: motel constructed
1949: motel altered
1952: second renovation with addition of six hotel rooms 1959: two-story addition to manager living quarter’s (Continued on Continuation Sheet page 4) *B7. Moved? ■ No □ Yes □ Unknown Date: N/A Original Location: N/A *B8. Related Features: None
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme N/A Area N/A
Period of Significance N/A Property Type N/A Applicable Criteria N/A Constructed in 1945 as the Twin Oaks Motel, 2101 North Fremont Street is a one-story motel, now the Casa Verde Inn, which served travelers through Monterey since its date of construction. The Minimal Traditional style motel is an example of early motels after World War II and the expansion of the federal highway system, which were common throughout the United States during this time. The 2101 North Fremont Street property is recommended ineligible for listing in the NRHP, CRHR, and as local historic resources, under any significance criteria. See Continuation Sheet page 4 for a full evaluation and historical context.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: N/A
*B12. References:

See Continuation Sheet page 6.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Ashley Losco, Rincon Consultants, Ventura, CA *Date of Evaluation: June 2022

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 417, Packet Page 420 State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

*Recorded by: Ashley Losco, Rincon Consultants *Date: July 2022 „ Continuation †Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
*B6. Construction History (Continued from page 3):
1966: living quarters, office, and diving area converted to a restauarnt, Caruso’s Corner Pizza 1972: motel renamed Casa Verde Inn, new sign designed and constructed 1981-1982: current office and living quarters constructed at the southeast corner of the property 1984: restaurant altered again with new storefront and roofline 1996: windows altered
2000s: pool infilled
*B10. Significance (Continued from page 3):

Property History
Site Development
Before the construction of the building at 2101 North Fremont Street, the subject property was undeveloped. By the early 1940s, the subject property appears to have been developed with one larger single-family house and three smaller adjacent cottage structures that continued along North Fremont Street, and possibly served as an early motor court for auto travelers.

By 1945, the earlier buildings on the subject property were replaced by the current motel building, first known as the Twin Oaks Motel (UCSB FrameFinder 1941, 1945 and City of Monterey Building Permits). At that time, the project site was larger and included the adjacent parcel to the north and was comprised of two operations – the U-shaped motel building fronting North Fremont Street and a large, paved lot on the north side of the building that served as an auto court called the Twin Oaks Court (The Californian 1949).

Following World War II, and the expansion of the federal highway system, motor courts were replaced with motels which could accommodate the growing number of travelers. During that time, the motel became the model for lodging in post-war America with a combination accommodation of the automobile and guests with guestrooms generally opening directly onto parking spaces (Survey LA 2017). Typical of the building type, Twin Oaks Motel featured a U-shaped building arranged around a central parking area with a manager’s quarters, office, and dining area at the southwest corner of the property. Though an original architect could not be identified, its design was typical of the period, with elements the Minimal Traditional and Revival styles widely used throughout the United States for motel design, especially in suburban settings, between 1935 and 1950. Motels with dining areas were also common during this period as motels were generally constructed in areas outside of downtowns that lacked amenities.

The motel served motoring families vacationing in Monterey or attending the Monterey County Fairgrounds south of the property, which was bringing in record crowds by 1947 (Monterey Herald 2017). The motel underwent several alterations throughout its history. In 1949, the motel was altered and repaired, the extent of which were not identified in city building permits. By 1952, the motel was owned by C. Foley and received a second renovation. Designed by architect Roger C. Poole, the renovation included the addition of six hotel rooms, designed with small kitchens, as well as a motel laundry room, likely to compete with other establishments catering to tourists in the area. Historic aerials from 1956 show that North Fremont Street had been heavily developed with other motels fronting the fairgrounds.

Improvements continued in the following years. In 1959, a two-story addition and kidney bean-shaped pool were constructed to the rear of the manager living quarters. The addition and pool were designed by Wallace Holm and Associates architecture firm (City of Monterey Building Permit 1959). Based out of Monterey, Holm’s work later focused on developing master plans, including those for Monterey Peninsula College and Laguna Seca. A 1960 Sanborn map shows the motel retained the same general configuration, and included the former auto court to the north, then noted as a trailer park.

In 1966 the living quarters, office, and dining area were converted to a restaurant named Caruso’s Corner Pizza (City of Monterey Building Permit 1966). As the area continued to develop for tourism, permanent restaurants gave travelers more food options on their trips. The conversion included a new storefront with large picture windows and glass doors. A flat overhanging eave was added to the front and east elevation of the former living quarters and a sign was designed and erected just outside the front door of the newly established restaurant. By this time, the trailer park was removed and served as a surface parking lot for the restaurant.

In 1972, the motel was renamed the Casa Verde Inn, and a new sign was designed for the rebranding (City of Monterey Building Permit 1972). According to County Assessor records, the current parcel boundary was in place by 1976 when the former trailer park and surface parking lot was developed with the current apartment buildings (Monterey County Assessor).

Between 1981 and 1982, the current office and living quarters were constructed at the southeast corner of the property. Three of the adjacent rooms were altered to connect to the living quarters (City of Monterey Building Permits 1981 and 1982). The plans were designed by Carmel-based architect James C. Heisinger and the building was constructed by S.A. Balbo Construction. In 1984, the restaurant was altered again with a new storefront with a hipped roof overhang, greenhouse window, double door entrance, and canvas awning (City of Monterey Building Permits 1981 to 1984). Civil engineer, Robert McBroome Jr., designed the alteration for owner, Kuar Pal Singh. In 1996, the windows were altered (City of Monterey Building Permit 1996). Aerial images indicate that the pool was infilled in the early 2000s. Since then, the building has remained largely unchanged and continues to operate as a motel.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 418, Packet Page 421 State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

*Recorded by: Ashley Losco, Rincon Consultants *Date: July 2022 „ Continuation †Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
*B10. Significance (Continued from page 4):

Historical Resources Evaluation
The property at 2101 North Fremont Street is recommended ineligible for listing in the NRHP, CRHR, and as local historic resource, under any significance criteria.

Developed between 1945-1949, the subject property is typical of the commercial development of Monterey during this period.

Following the establishment of the Monterey County Fairgrounds in 1936 and subsequent increase in tourism after World War II, the property was one of several motels constructed along North Fremont Street during this era. Research for this study did not reveal that the subject property was individually significant within this context or any other historic trend important to the region, state, or nation. The property is recommended ineligible for listing in the NRHP and the CRHR under Criterion A/1.

The property has had a number of owners and operators since its construction. Research conducted for the present study did not identify any individual connected with the property has made significant historical contributions; therefore, the property is recommended ineligible for listing to the NRHP and the CRHR under Criterion B/2. 2101 Fremont Street was constructed between 1945 and 1949 as motel. Built with elements of the Minimal Traditional and Revival Styles, it was one of many properties designed with the same characteristics during this period. It does not embody distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. Furthermore, the property has been substantially altered since its construction between 1945 and 1949 with the addition of a two-story section at the rear of the manager living quarters in 1959, a complete alteration of the façade of the living quarters and dining area into a restaurant in 1966 and 1984, the addition of the office in 1981, and the replacement of all windows in 1996. As a result, the building has diminished integrity of material and design.

The subject property has undergone several alterations throughout its history each designed and constructed by various architects and building contractors. The original architect and contractor of the motel were not identified during research. The additions and alterations from the other architects and contractors are minor additions and not representative of their respective works. It also is not the work of a master nor does it possess high artistic value. Therefore, 2021 North Fremont Street is recommended ineligible for listing to the NRHP and CRHR under Criterion C/3.

Finally, a review of available evidence and records search results did not indicate the property may yield important information about prehistory or history. The property is recommended ineligible for listing to the NRHP and CRHR under Criterion D/4.

Because the subject property is not eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR, it is also ineligible for listing as a local historic resource under H-1 Landmark Overlay Zoning. The property is also recommended ineligible for listing as a local historic resource under H-2 Historic Resource Overlay zoning. The subject property at 2101 North Fremont Street, as outlined above, does not reflect any local importance unique to Monterey or the Monterey Peninsula and was a typical motel development common during the period and is a common building type that was repeated across the United States. Finally, the subject property is not eligible for inclusion in a local historic district under criterion H-D District Overlay Zoning.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 419, Packet Page 422 State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

*Recorded by: Ashley Losco, Rincon Consultants *Date: July 2022 „ Continuation †Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Photo 1: West and South Elevations of guest rooms, Facing Northeast *B12. References (Continued from page 3):

The Californian
1949 Advertisement. March 21. Accessed July 2022 through Newspapers.com.

City of Monterey Building Permits
Var. Building permits for the subject property at 2102 N. Fremont Street (APN 013-112-045) between 1949 and 1996.

Copeland, Denis
N.d. Monterey: History on the Half Shell. Accessed online at https://ncph.org/wp-content/uploads/Monterey-History-on-the-HalfShell.pdf. June 2022.

Monterey Herald
2017 “Monterey Fairgrounds Steeped in History from its Roots Through Pop Music Festival Lore,” June 15. Accessed June 2022 at https://www.montereyherald.com/2017/06/15/monterey-fairgrounds-steeped-in-history-from-its-roots-through-pop-musicfestival-lore/.

Los Angeles, City of
2016 SurveyLA, Los Angeles Historic Resources Survey. Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement Context:

Commercial Development, 1850-1980. Theme: Commercial Development and the Automobile, 1910-1970.

University of Califonria Santa Barbara (UCSB)
2022 FrameFinder. Various historical topographic maps and aerials of the project site and surrounding area between 1941 and 1961. Accessed June 2022, through https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder/.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 420, Packet Page 423 Appendix D-1
Environmental Noise Study

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 421, Packet Page 424

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 422, Packet Page 425 Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 423, Packet Page 426 Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 424, Packet Page 427 Appendix D-2
Environmental Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 425, Packet Page 428 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
Monterey, CA

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE AND

VIBRATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT
7 April 2023
Prepared for: Vin Patel Anthony Lombardo
Lakshmi Hotel Partners
2113 North Fremont Street
Monterey, CA 93940
[email protected]
Anthony Lombardo & Associates
144 West Gabilian Street
Salinas, CA 93901
[email protected]
Prepared by: Salter
Ben Piper – Senior Associate
Jeremy Decker, PE – Vice President
[email protected]
[email protected]
Salter Project 21-0370

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 426, Packet Page 429 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our noise and vibration impact assessment (NVIA) for the Avid Hotel project. It summarizes the policies and standards applicable to the project, noise data obtained from our on-site acoustical measurements, and our evaluation of potential noise and vibration impacts resulting from the project on existing land-uses. Those readers not familiar with the fundamental concepts of environmental noise may refer to Appendix A. The consideration of existing exterior noise intrusion to the Hotel is addressed in a separate report.

SUMMARY
To reduce potential impacts to adjacent properties, we developed mitigation measures to address mechanical equipment noise. Acknowledging that the nearest neighbors are acoustically-sensitive residences, we are also providing recommendations to further reduce noise. This includes a noise barrier fence along the north property line. This should reduce operational noise from parking and other activities, and it would provide beneficial acoustical shielding from North Fremont Street traffic noise. See Section 1 of this report for specific information. To reduce construction noise and vibration, we are providing recommendations for consideration (see Section 4).

With the proposed mitigation measures described herein, the project is not expected to result in significant noise impacts. Our recommendations, if implemented, would further reduce noise.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project proposes the demolition of an existing one-story, 18 guestroom hotel and restaurant and the construction of a new three-story, 42 guestroom branded hotel. The project site is within the North Fremont Specific Plan at the northeast corner of North Fremont Street and Casa Verde Way.

The project site is zoned as “Visitor Accommodation Facility.” Nearby land-uses are zoned “Planned Community” (i.e., the neighboring retail/commercial), Residential 2 (multi-family), and Residential 1 (primarily single-family). The project site shares property lines with the Mahroom Apartments directly to the north and a State Farm office to the east.

NOISE AND VIBRATION CRITERIA
City of Monterey General Plan
The Noise Element of the City’s General Plan1 includes Policy d.2 which states that the hours of noise-generating construction activities are to be limited and that this is to be included as a project condition of approval.
1 https://monterey.org/Portals/0/Policies-Procedures/Planning/GeneralPlan/16_0323-General-Plan.pdf

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 427, Packet Page 430 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

Table 8 in the Noise Element presents the City’s land-use compatibility standards and specifies maximum noise exposures up to the following levels to be “normally acceptable” for various land-uses:
● Commercial and Professional: CNEL2 70 dB
● Multi-family residential and transient lodging: CNEL 65 dB ● Low-density residential (e.g., single-family, duplex, mobile homes): CNEL 60 dB Monterey North Fremont Specific Plan
Chapter 4, Figure 3 of the City’s North Fremont Specific Plan3 identifies nearby residential land-uses as noise-sensitive and specifies that these are to receive “special consideration during site and building designs for new development along North Fremont.”
Monterey Municipal Code
Chapter 38 of the City Municipal Code4 includes the following noise, vibration, and construction standards applicable to this project.

City Code - Noise
As specified in Municipal Code Section 38-111, ambient noise at adjacent uses is not to exceed the levels shown below in Table 1.

Table 1: Maximum Noise Standards by Zoning District
Zone of PropertyReceiving Noise Maximum Noise Level (dBA) OS Open Space District 60
R Residential District 60
PS Public and Semi-Public District 60
C Commercial District 65
I Industrial District 70
PD Planned Development Study Required
The noise standards in Table 1 shall be modified as follows to account for the effects of time and duration on the impact of noise levels:
2 CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) – A descriptor for a 24-hour A-weighted average noise level. CNEL accounts for the increased acoustical sensitivity of people to noise during the evening and nighttime hours. CNEL penalizes sound levels by 5 dB during the hours from 7 PM to 10 PM and by 10 dB during the hours from 10 PM to 7 AM. For practical purposes, the CNEL and DNL are usually interchangeable.
3 https://www.monterey.org/Portals/0/PoliciesProcedures/Planning/WorkProgram/NFSP/16_0817_North_Fremont_SP_Amend_Final_Web.pdf 4 https://monterey.municipal.codes/Code/38-111

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 428, Packet Page 431 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

● In residential districts, the noise standard shall be 5 dB lower between 10 pm and 7 am ● Noise produced for no more than a cumulative period of five minutes in any hour may exceed the standards by 5 dB
● Noise that is produced for no more than a cumulative period of one minute in any hour may exceed the standards by 10 dB
City Code - Vibration
Per Municipal Code Section 38-111, no use, activity, or process shall produce vibrations that are perceptible without instruments by a reasonable person at the property lines of a site.

Based on feedback from City staff, we understand that the noise levels listed in Table 1 and vibration limitations do not apply to construction activities (as many typical construction activities would be expected to exceed these guidelines). Thus, alternative performance standards for construction noise and vibration are provided below.

City Code - Construction
Municipal Code Section 38-112.2 identifies the allowable hours of construction (without an exception permit) as follows:
● Monday through Friday: 7 am to 7 pm
● Saturday: 8 am to 6 pm
● Sunday: 10 am to 5 pm
Additional Criteria
Based on input from City staff and coordination with the project team, the following criteria have also been proposed for the evaluation of traffic noise and construction noise and vibration. It is acknowledged that these criteria are not currently included in the City standards.

Traffic Noise
Increases in traffic noise would be significant if they exceedthe following thresholds:
● Greater than 5 dB if existing ambient noise less than 60 db ● 3 dB if existing ambient noise is between 60 and 64 db ● 1.5 dB if existing ambient noise is greater than 65

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 429, Packet Page 432 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

Construction Noise
The Federal Highway Road Construction noise model is to be used to assess the project’s construction noise against the Federal Transit Administration’s general assessment noise analysis threshold of 90 dBA Leq over 1 hour (Leq(h) 5
).

Construction Vibration
Construction vibration is to be compared to common thresholds for potential building damage. These are provided for reference in Table 2.

Table 2: Caltrans Vibration Guidelines for Potential Damage to Structures6 Structure and Condition
Maximum PPV (inches/second)
Transient
Sources
Continuous/Frequent
Intermittent Sources
Extremely fragile historic buildings, ruins, ancient monuments 0.12 0.08 Fragile buildings 0.2 0.1
Historic and some old buildings 0.5 0.25
Older residential structures 0.5 0.3
New residential structures 1.0 0.5
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.0 0.5

EXISTING NOISE ENVIRONMENT
To quantify the existing noise environment at the project site, we conducted two continuous long-term noise measurements between 2 and 4 August 2021. Our monitors were mounted to poles at an approximate height of 10 feet above grade. We also conducted a short-term (15 minute) measurement at approximately five feet above grade. The purpose of the measurements was to quantify ambient noise levels at the site, primarily from adjacent roadway traffic. The measurement locations and measured noise levels are indicated on the attached Figure 1.
5 Leq(h) – The equivalent steady-state A-weighted sound level that, in an hour, would contain the same acoustic energy as the time-varying sound level during the same period. This metric is commonly used to describe the average noise level over an hour.
6 Caltrans, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Table 19), September 2013.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 430, Packet Page 433 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

ANALYSIS
We are providing a separate environmental noise study to address noise levels inside the proposed hotel to meet the related standards. This report addresses the following potential noise and vibration impacts resulting from the project on nearby existing land-uses.

Operating Phase (after Construction of New Hotel)

1. Mechanical Equipment Noise

2. Removal of the Casa Verde Inn

3. Parking Lot Noise
Construction Phase

4. Demolition and Construction Noise and Vibration

1. Mechanical Equipment Noise
Potential Impact: New mechanical equipment associated with the Avid Hotel might generate noise in excess of the City Municipal Code standards at nearby property lines.

Analysis: We understand that the hotel HVAC systems will include Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) units for the guestrooms, rooftop exhaust fans for the bathrooms, and split system rooftop condensing units for the public spaces.

The orientation of the Avid Hotel places it equal to or farther from adjacent property lines than the Casa Verde Inn. The proposed HVAC systems of the size and scope for such a project typically do not exceed 75 dBA at a distance of five feet. This would correlate to approximately 52 dBA at the north property line (Mahroom Apartments) and 56 dBA at the east property line (State Farm office). Furthermore, natural “shielding” of rooftop equipment by the edge of the roof and parapet would provide further noise reduction. Thus, we expect the Municipal Code standards will be met (see Table 1 for reference).

Mitigation Measure 1: Selection of “standard” mechanical equipment is expected to be sufficient to meet the City noise standards. The mechanical systems are to be selected and designed to generate a maximum cumulative noise level of 63 dB at 25 feet from the building. This would reduce noise levels to meet the City’s nighttime limit.

2. Removal of the Casa Verde Inn
Potential Impact: Removal of the existing inn (and the proposed location of the Avid Hotel) could increase traffic noise exposure to the Mahroom Apartments.

Analysis: The adjacent Mahroom Apartments are currently “shielded” from North Fremont Street traffic by the existing Casa Verde Inn building structure. The proposed new hotel would have a different footprint, allowing a portion of the apartment building to be exposed to greater traffic noise. Using our noise measurement data, we created a 3D noise model using CadnaA software. CadnaA is an acoustic 3D

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 431, Packet Page 434 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

modelling software. Our methodology for this project is described in Appendix B as well as our model inputs/outputs). At some locations, noise levels might be reduced slightly from additional shielding provided be the increase in building height.

Figures 2 and 3 show CNEL noise levels with the existing and proposed conditions on Level 1 of the south-facing facades of the Mahroom Apartments. The plans and our model include a property line fence of variable height (depending on grade). Locations highlighted in red indicate areas where noise levels are projected to increase. At most of the relevant portions of the Mahroom Apartments, the estimated increase in noise levels would be moderate, approximately 3 to 5 dB with removal of the Casa Verde Inn.

However, in a unique and narrow location, noise levels are calculated to increase by approximately 7 to 9 dB.

Figure 2: Existing Conditions – Level 1 Figure 3: Proposed Conditions – Level 1 Figures 4 and 5 show CNEL noise levels with the existing and proposed conditions on Level 2 of the south-facing facades of the Mahroom Apartments. Locations highlighted in red indicate areas where noise levels are projected to increase. Noise levels are calculated to increase by 1 or 2 dB with removal of the Casa Verde Inn. At the second floor, the existing “shielding” by the Casa Verde Inn is moderate. In the proposed condition, it seems that the smaller footprint of the proposed hotel is balanced by the fact that it will be taller than the existing building.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 432, Packet Page 435 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

Figure 4: Existing Conditions – Level 2 Figure 5: Proposed Conditions – Level 2

Recommendations: With the addition of the proposed Avid Hotel, noise levels are expected to stay below CNEL 65 dB, which is within the range considered “normally acceptable” for multi-family housing per the City’s land-use compatibility standards. Therefore, noise at the neighboring apartments would still meet City land-use compatibility standards with the building and property line fence constructed per the current plans.

To keep noise levels within 5 dB of current conditions at the Mahroom Apartments property, the applicant will be providing a minimum 7-foot-tall barrier on the retaining wall along the north property line. To perform as intended, the barrier would need to be constructed with the following properties:
● Continuous from grade up to specified height
● Free of cracks and gaps
● Constructed of material with a minimum surface density of 3 psf A solid stucco wall, precast concrete, or heavy-duty board-on-board wooden fence could be appropriate.

Figure 6 indicates the recommended minimum extents of the barrier.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 433, Packet Page 436 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

Figure 6: Location of Noise Barrier Fence

We understand that the Mahroom Apartments requested that the wall length be extended to encompass portions of the eastern property line (in addition to the north). We don’t expect this to be necessary but have no objection.

For reference, Figure 7 shows an example section view of the proposed noise barrier fence. Note, the 7-foot dimension is in addition to the retaining wall. This is in line with the site perimeter wall heights indicated on the drawing set dated 6 May 2021 (attached in Appendix C for reference).

Figure 7: Noise Barrier Fence Section View
Figures 8 and 9 compare calculated noise levels on Level 1 of the Mahroom Apartments in the existing conditions versus with the recommended noise barrier fence. Calculated CNEL across the Level 1 facades are all within 4 dB. CNEL on Level 2 were calculated to be within 2 dB without the added barrier (see Figures 4 and 5 for reference).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 434, Packet Page 437 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

Figure 8: Existing Conditions – Level 1 Figure 9: Proposed Conditions with Noise Barrier Fence – Level 1
Our measurements indicate existing ambient noise levels are between 48 and 61 dBA along the facades of the Mahroom Apartments. Therefore, the 5 dB and 3 dB thresholds of exceedance are applicable.

Ambient noise at the Mahroom Apartment facades does not exceed 65 dBA. Therefore, the 1.5 dB threshold is not applicable. Our analysis indicates that where ambient noise is between 60 and 64 dB, traffic noise level increases are expected to be less than 3 dB. Where ambient noise is less than 60 dB, traffic noise level increases are expected to be less than 5 dB. This is indicated in Figures 2 to 5, 8, and 9.

3. Parking Lot Noise
Potential Impact: Vehicle noise could increase noise levels at the Mahroom Apartments.

Analysis: Neighboring multi-family residences are already exposed to the activity noise of their own existing parking lots. Therefore, we would not expect activity in the proposed project parking area to have a significant impact.

Nonetheless, we further analyzed potential parking lot noise in comparison to existing noise levels.

Parking lot activity noise (e.g., car doors, driving vehicles, engine starting) could generate noise levels between approximately 55 dB and 70 dB at a distance of five feet. At a distance of 15 feet, those noise levels would be reduced to approximately 45 dB to 60 dB. These levels are in-line with existing noise levels at the site. In addition, they are also below City Municipal Code standards of 60 dB to 70 dB for short-term activity noise (that occurs for less than 1 or 5 minutes, daytime and nighttime, residential receptor, see Table 1).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 435, Packet Page 438 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

Furthermore, parking activity noise levels are expected to be reduced even further by the proposed noise barrier fence at the property line to the north shared with the nearest residential neighbor, the Mahroom Apartments.

Per the project’s Level of Service traffic analysis7 We understand that the project will result in up to 351 increased traffic trips. Our conservative analysis indicates that the “worst-case” noise increase from the additional daily traffic trips would be 0.6 dB along North Fremont Street. This increase would not be significant.

Recommendations: No further measures are needed. However, the noise barrier fence described in Section 1 of this report and as shown on Sheet A2.1 would be beneficial to further reduce parking lot activity noise at the residential property to the north.

4. Demolition and Construction Noise and Vibration
Potential Impact: Construction activities would include use of heavy equipment for demolition, excavation, grading, foundation construction, building erection, and other activities. This could temporarily increase noise and vibration levels at adjacent land-uses.

Noise Analysis: Neighboring land-uses with direct line-of-sight to construction activities and construction traffic could be affected by construction noise. Potential construction noise impacts would vary with distance. Table 3 summarizes the expected construction phases, equipment, and typical maximum noise levels. Extreme noise generating activities, such as deep foundation construction is not expected.

Table 3: Typical Maximum Construction Noise Levels
Phase Equipment Noise
at 50’
Noise
at
100’
Demolition,
Excavation, Grading
Excavator, Ram hoe, Dump truck, Saw cutter, loader, Sheep’s foot compactor, Backhoe, 10-Wheel truck, Delivery truck 88 82 Utilities
Excavator, Loader, Sheep’s foot compactor, Backhoe, 10-Wheel truck, Concrete truck, Delivery truck, Boom pump, Line pump, Compactor
82 76
Foundations
Excavator, Backhoe, Loader, 10-Wheel Truck, Concrete Truck, Boom pump, Line pump, Compactor, Gradall forklift, Truss crane, Delivery truck
88 82
Building Exterior Rooftop crane, Boomlift, Stucco pump, Delivery truck 83 76 Building Interior Gypcrete pump, Gradall forklift, Delivery truck 80 74 Hardscape and
Landscape
Skid steer loader, 10-Wheel truck, Paving machine, Roller, Concrete truck, Line pump, Delivery truck 85 79
7 27 February 2023, TJKM Transportation Consultants report

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 436, Packet Page 439 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

The FTA general assessment method provides a maximum daytime noise criterion of Leq(h) 90 dBA at residential properties for the two noisiest pieces of equipment during each phase of construction. For this analysis, we used the construction equipment list provided by the project’s general contractor, Avila Construction. This information is included in Appendix D for reference.

The FTA general assessment method assumes that all equipment is operating at the center of the project.

The site is approximately 125 feet wide (north to south property lines). Therefore, we have used 62.5 feet (125 divided by 2) as the distance to calculate noise transfer to the north property line (abutting the Mahroom Apartments). We have accounted for a minimum 7-foot construction barrier above the retaining wall as indicated in the drawings. This could be a temporary construction barrier, or the permanent noise barrier could be installed prior to construction. The results of our general assessment calculations are shown in Appendix E. Construction noise is calculated to be below the FTA Leq(h) 90 dBA criterion for each phase of construction.

We understand that the City has not formally adopted this FTA construction noise analysis protocol and Leq(h) 90 dB threshold as a limit for construction noise. Nonetheless, this analysis helps to demonstrate why a construction noise barrier and the following related noise reduction measures are appropriate and should be implemented as feasible.

Required Noise Mitigation: Provide a sound barrier at the northern property line. This could be a solid fence constructed of minimum 7-foot-tall sheets of 5/8-inch thick plywood with appropriate supports.

The plywood should overlap at vertical joints by a few inches and be fastened together. Avoid any gap at the ground. Construction noise reduction blankets with a solid layer (e.g., 1-psf vinyl) could also be used.

Alternatively, construct the permanent noise barrier fence recommended in Section 1 of this report prior to proceeding with significant site and building construction efforts.

Prior to the demolition of the existing Casa Verde Inn structure, it will serve as a noise barrier. We expect that the demolition of the structure will occur very quickly. Following the demolition, the aforementioned construction noise barrier must be constructed before other significant noise-generating activities commence at the site.

In addition, to address the City Code, construction would need to be limited as follows:
● Monday through Friday: 7 am to 7 pm
● Saturday: 8 am to 6 pm
● Sunday: 10 am to 5 pm
Construction outside of these hours might be approved by obtaining a site-specific permit.

Noise Reduction Recommendations: We understand that the City Code general property line noise limits are not applied to typical construction activities. Nonetheless, due to the sensitivity of neighboring properties, such as the Mahroom Apartments to the north, we are providing the following list of options for consideration, as feasible, to further control construction noise.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 437, Packet Page 440 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

1. Require posted signs at the construction site that include permitted construction days and hours, a day and evening contact number for the job site and a day and evening contact number for the City in the event of problems.

2. Notify the City and neighbors within 100 feet in advance of the schedule for each major phase of construction and expected loud activities.

3. When feasible, locate noisy stationary equipment (e.g., generators, pumps, compressors) and material unloading and staging areas away from the sensitive adjacent uses (school and residences).

4. Require that all construction equipment be in good working order and that mufflers are inspected to be functioning properly. If feasible, impact tools shall be shrouded or shielded with intake and exhaust port mufflers when used near noise-sensitive receptors.

5. Avoid unnecessary idling of equipment and engines and to a maximum of 15 minutes near noisesensitive receptors.

6. The general contractor shall designate a “noise disturbance coordinator” responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator shall determine the cause of any noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall require that reasonable measures be implemented to correct the problem. A telephone number for the disturbance coordinator shall be posted at the construction site.

Vibration Analysis: Table 4 presents typical vibration levels8 that could be expected from construction equipment at nearby property lines. Note that exact vibration levels will vary depending on soil conditions, construction methods, and equipment used at the site. 8 From the Caltrans “Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual” (September 2013) and the “Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment” report by the United States Department of Transportation, Office of Planning and Environment, Federal Transit Administration, May 2006. Estimated levels at setbacks greater than 25 feet are estimated per the Caltrans published formula PPVequipment = PPVref (25/D)n, where PPVref is the reference PPV at 25 feet, D is the distance from the equipment to the receiver (in feet), and n is a reference value of 1.1.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 438, Packet Page 441 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

Table 4: Expected Construction Vibration Levels Compared to Potential Building Damage Thresholds Property Line
North & East
(Mahroom Apartments
and State Farm)
South
(El Castell Motel)
West
(Alliance Mart)
Potential Building
Damage
Equipment PPV at 25 ft.
(in/sec)
PPV at 130 ft.
(in/sec)
PPV at 50 ft.
(in/sec) Threshold Limits
Vibratory Roller 0.21 0.02 0.10

0.5 for continuous
sources

0.25 for transient
sources
Vibratory
Driver 0.1 to 0.15 0.02 to 0.02 0.05 to 0.07
Hoe Ram 0.09 0.01 0.04
Large bulldozer 0.09 0.01 0.04
Caisson drilling 0.09 0.01 0.04
Loaded trucks 0.08 0.01 0.04
Jackhammer 0.04 0.00 0.02
Small bulldozer 0.00 0.00 0.00
As indicated in Table 4, maximum construction vibration levels are not expected to exceed 0.21 PPV (in/sec). This is below the threshold for potential damage at historic and some old buildings (see Table 2).

We expect this will be sufficient for the nearest adjacent structures.

Required Vibration Mitigation: Based on the analysis above, we expect that no construction vibration mitigation is needed to comply with the proposed thresholds for potential building damage.

Vibration Recommendations: In practice, we understand that the City Code standard regarding human perception of vibration is not applied to typical construction activities. Nonetheless, due to the sensitivity of neighboring properties, such as the Mahroom Apartments to the north, we are providing the following list of options for consideration, as feasible, to further control construction vibration9 . Caltrans guidelines
for the assessment of construction vibration as it relates to human perception are between 0.01 PPV and

0.25 PPV. Thus, some construction activities could be perceptible when located close to neighboring receivers.

1. Earth-moving and ground-impacting operations should be phased so as not to occur at the same time along the same property line to reduce cumulative vibration impacts.

2. Minimize discontinuities in roadway pavement where trucks will travel.

3. Avoid using vibratory rollers and tampers within 25 feet of adjacent structures. Non-vibratory sheepsfoot rollers could be used instead.

4. Avoid routing heavily loaded trucks through residential streets.

5. Operate earth-moving equipment on the construction lot as far away from the north and east property lines as possible.
9 We understand that neither impact nor vibratory deep foundations are needed for this building. Drilled piers, if needed, would be acceptable.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 439, Packet Page 442 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

6. Notify adjacent properties of the construction schedule (in particular, prior to days of high-vibration activity, such as demolition) and provide the name and contact information of the project disturbance coordinator.

CONCLUSION
With the proposed mitigation measures described herein, the project’s mechanical equipment noise is not expected to result in a significant noise impact. Though additional mitigation is not required to address the published City standards, we have provided recommendations for a property line noise barrier to address additional criteria proposed for traffic and construction noise. In addition, we assume that the Municipal Code standards for noise and vibration do not apply to demolition and construction activities. However, due to the proximity of sensitive neighbors, we have provided recommendations above, to further reduce noise and vibration.
***

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 440, Packet Page 443 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

APPENDIX A
Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Noise
This section provides background information to aid in understanding the technical aspects of this report.

Three dimensions of environmental noise are important in determining subjective response. These are:
● The intensity or level of the sound
● The frequency spectrum of the sound
● The time-varying character of the sound
Airborne sound is a rapid fluctuation of air pressure above and below atmospheric pressure. Sound levels are usually measured and expressed in decibels (dB), with 0 dB corresponding roughly to the threshold of hearing.

The "frequency" of a sound refers to the number of complete pressure fluctuations per second in the sound. The unit of measurement is the cycle per second (cps) or hertz (Hz). Most of the sounds, which we hear in the environment, do not consist of a single frequency, but of a broad band of frequencies, differing in level. The name of the frequency and level content of a sound is its sound spectrum. A sound spectrum for engineering purposes is typically described in terms of octave bands, which separate the audible frequency range (for human beings, from about 20 to 20,000 Hz) into ten segments.

Many rating methods have been devised to permit comparisons of sounds having quite different spectra.

Surprisingly, the simplest method correlates with human response practically as well as the more complex methods. This method consists of evaluating all of the frequencies of a sound in accordance with a weighting that progressively de-emphasizes the importance of frequency components below 1000 Hz and above 5000 Hz. This frequency weighting reflects the fact that human hearing is less sensitive at low frequencies and at extreme high frequencies relative to the mid-range.

The weighting system described above is called "A"-weighting, and the level so measured is called the "A-weighted sound level" or "A-weighted noise level." The unit of A-weighted sound level is sometimes abbreviated "dBA." In practice, the sound level is conveniently measured using a sound level meter that includes an electrical filter corresponding to the A-weighting characteristic. All U.S. and international standard sound level meters include such a filter. Typical sound levels found in the environment and in industry are shown in Figure A-1.

Although a single sound level value may adequately describe environmental noise at any instant in time, community noise levels vary continuously. Most environmental noise is a conglomeration of distant noise sources, which results in a relatively steady background noise having no identifiable source. These distant sources may include traffic, wind in trees, industrial activities, etc. and are relatively constant from moment to moment. As natural forces change or as human activity follows its daily cycle, the sound level may vary slowly from hour to hour. Superimposed on this slowly varying background is a succession of identifiable noisy events of brief duration. These may include nearby activities such as single vehicle passbys, aircraft flyovers, etc. which cause the environmental noise level to vary from instant to instant.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 441, Packet Page 444 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

To describe the time-varying character of environmental noise, statistical noise descriptors were developed. "L10" is the A-weighted sound level equaled or exceeded during 10 percent of a stated time period. The L10 is considered a good measure of the maximum sound levels caused by discrete noise events. "L50" is the A-weighted sound level that is equaled or exceeded 50 percent of a stated time period; it represents the median sound level. The "L90" is the A-weighted sound level equaled or exceeded during 90 percent of a stated time period and is used to describe the background noise.

As it is often cumbersome to quantify the noise environment with a set of statistical descriptors, a single number called the average sound level or "Leq" is now widely used. The term "Leq" originated from the concept of a so-called equivalent sound level which contains the same acoustical energy as a varying sound level during the same time period. In simple but accurate technical language, the Leq is the average A-weighted sound level in a stated time period. The Leq is particularly useful in describing the subjective change in an environment where the source of noise remains the same but there is change in the level of activity. Widening roads and/or increasing traffic are examples of this kind of situation.

In determining the daily measure of environmental noise, it is important to account for the different response of people to daytime and nighttime noise. During the nighttime, exterior background noise levels are generally lower than in the daytime; however, most household noise also decreases at night, thus exterior noise intrusions again become noticeable. Further, most people trying to sleep at night are more sensitive to noise. To account for human sensitivity to nighttime noise levels, a special descriptor was developed. The descriptor is called the Ldn (Day/Night Average Sound Level), which represents the 24- hour average sound level with a penalty for noise occurring at night. The Ldn computation divides the 24- hour day into two periods: daytime (7:00 am to 10:00 pm); and nighttime (10:00 pm to 7:00 am). The nighttime sound levels are assigned a 10 dB penalty prior to averaging with daytime hourly sound levels.

For highway noise environments, the average noise level during the peak hour traffic volume is approximately equal to the Ldn.

The effects of noise on people can be listed in three general categories:
● Subjective effects of annoyance, nuisance, dissatisfaction ● Interference with activities such as speech, sleep, and learning ● Physiological effects such as startle, hearing loss
The sound levels associated with environmental noise usually produce effects only in the first two categories. Unfortunately, there has never been a completely predictable measure for the subjective effects of noise nor of the corresponding reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction. This is primarily because of the wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance and habituation to noise over time.

Thus, an important factor in assessing a person's subjective reaction is to compare the new noise environment to the existing noise environment. In general, the more a new noise exceeds the existing, the less acceptable the new noise will be judged.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 442, Packet Page 445 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

With regard to increases in noise level, knowledge of the following relationships will be helpful in understanding the quantitative sections of this report:

Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of only 1 dB in sound level cannot be perceived. Outside of the laboratory, a 3 dB change is considered a just-noticeable difference. A change in level of at least 5 dB is required before any noticeable change in community response would be expected.

A 10 dB change is subjectively heard as approximately a doubling in loudness, and would almost certainly cause an adverse community response.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 443, Packet Page 446 Avid Hotel, 2101 North Fremont Street
7 April 2023
Environmental NVIA

APPENDIX B
Project Methodology
Our methodology for this project was as follows:

1. Conduct long-term noise measurements at the project site to determine existing traffic noise levels from North Fremont Street and Casa Verde Way

2. Model the existing project site with the measured traffic noise levels to determine noise levels at the Mahroom Apartments

3. Model the proposed project site (i.e., removal of the Casa Verde Inn and addition of the Avid Hotel) to determine the increase in traffic noise exposure to the Mahroom Apartments

4. Add noise barriers to the model in various configurations to determine the heights and locations necessary to mitigate traffic noise to meet the project criteria ● Input Data: The parameters and information incorporated into our CadnaA computer model o The measured noise level of CNEL 68 dB at 20 feet from the centerline of Casa Verde Way o The measured noise level of CNEL 72 dB at 50 feet from the centerline of North Fremont Street o Building envelopes and heights for the Mahroom Apartments, Casa Verde Inn, surrounding buildings, and proposed Avid Hotel from the site plans and observations on site o Noise barrier heights and grade changes as indicated in the project drawings ● Output Data: Noise levels at the facades of the Mahroom Apartments with the existing Casa Verde Inn and proposed Avid Hotel – as shown in Figures 2 to 5, 8 and 9.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 444, Packet Page 447 APPENDIX B: Cadna/A Model Inputs/Outputs
Filename (21-0370_Avid Hotel_BDP.cna)
Group Table Day / Night
Name Expression
Root !*
Source
Name M. ID
Casa Verde Way
N Fremont Street
Sound Sources
Roads
Name M. ID Lme Count Data exact Count Data Speed Limit SCS Surf Day Evening Night DTV Str.class. M p (%) Auto Truck Dist. Dstro (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night (km/h) (km/h) (dB) Casa Verde Way 61.1 -0.1 61.4 0.0
N Fremont Street 69.2 -0.1 66.2 0.0
Receivers
Name M. ID Level Lr Limit. Value Land Use Height Coordinates CNEL Leq(h) CNEL Leq(h) Type Auto Noise Type X Y
(dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (m) (m) (m)
LT-2: CNEL 73 dB (72+1), Leq(h) 70 dB (69+1) - 73.0 70.1 0.0 0.0 x Total 3.66 r 10601797.31 4050705.0 LT-1: CNEL 69 dB (68+1), Leq(h) 69 dB (68+1) - 69.0 69.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 3.66 r 10601722.83 4050736.9 ST-1: CNEL 61 dB (60+1), Leq(h) 58 dB (57+1) - 60.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 x Total 1.53 r 10601767.06 4050726.9 Test Receiver 1 - 53.5 51.7 0.0 0.0 x Total 1.53 r 10601788.49 4050739.4 Test Receiver 2 - 60.3 59.3 0.0 0.0 x Total 1.53 r 10601749.10 4050747.5 Obstacles
Barriers
Name M. ID Absorption Z-Ext. Cantilever Height
left right horz. vert. Begin End
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Retaining Wall 1 ft (E) + 0.30 r
Retaining Wall 2 ft (N) - 15.55 a
Retaining Wall 7 ft (NE) &.5ft RW + 17.29 a
Retaining Wall 7 ft (N) & 0.5ft RW + 17.29 a
Retaining Wall 5.5 ft (NW) + 15.55 a
Retaining Wall 6 ft (E) - 16.83 a
Buildings
Name M. ID RB Residents Absorption Height
Begin
(m)
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 24.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 23.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 24.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a
Salter #21-0580
Source
Name M. ID
Casa Verde Way
N Fremont Street
Sound Sources
Roads
Name M. ID Lme Count Data exact Count Data Speed Limit SCS Surf Day Evening Night DTV Str.class. M p (%) Auto Truck Dist. Dstro (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night (km/h) (km/h) (dB) Casa Verde Way 61.1 -0.1 61.4 0.0
N Fremont Street 69.2 -0.1 66.2 0.0
Receivers
Name M. ID Level Lr Limit. Value Land Use Height Coordinates CNEL Leq(h) CNEL Leq(h) Type Auto Noise Type X Y
(dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (m) (m) (m)
LT-2: CNEL 73 dB (72+1), Leq(h) 70 dB (69+1) - 73.0 70.1 0.0 0.0 x Total 3.66 r 10601797.31 4050705.0 LT-1: CNEL 69 dB (68+1), Leq(h) 69 dB (68+1) - 69.0 69.0 0.0 0.0 x Total 3.66 r 10601722.83 4050736.9 ST-1: CNEL 61 dB (60+1), Leq(h) 58 dB (57+1) - 60.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 x Total 1.53 r 10601767.06 4050726.9 Test Receiver 1 - 53.5 51.7 0.0 0.0 x Total 1.53 r 10601788.49 4050739.4 Test Receiver 2 - 60.3 59.3 0.0 0.0 x Total 1.53 r 10601749.10 4050747.5 Obstacles
Barriers
Name M. ID Absorption Z-Ext. Cantilever Height
left right horz. vert. Begin End
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Retaining Wall 1 ft (E) + 0.30 r
Retaining Wall 2 ft (N) - 15.55 a
Retaining Wall 7 ft (NE) &.5ft RW + 17.29 a
Retaining Wall 7 ft (N) & 0.5ft RW + 17.29 a
Retaining Wall 5.5 ft (NW) + 15.55 a
Retaining Wall 6 ft (E) - 16.83 a
Buildings
Name M. ID RB Residents Absorption Height
Begin
(m)
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 24.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 23.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 24.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 445, Packet Page 448 APPENDIX B: Cadna/A Model Inputs/Outputs
Name M. ID RB Residents Absorption Height
Begin
(m)
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 17.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 20.00 a
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 18.00 a
21-0370 Demo1 - x 0 0.50 20.00 a
21-0370 Demo2 - x 0 0.50 20.00 a
21-0370 Demo3 (Pool Slab) - x 0 0.50 15.00 a
21-0370 Project Building + x 0 0.50 26.46 a
21-0370 Impacted Building + x 0 0.50 20.00 a
Foliage
Name M. ID Height
(m)
Built-Up Areas
Name M. ID Type Attenuation B m Height
dB/100m % 1/m (m)
Geometrical Data
Geometry Line Sources
Name Height Coordinates
Begin End x y z Ground
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Geometry Area Sources
Name Height Coordinates
Begin End x y z Ground
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Geometry Parking Lots
Name Height Coordinates
Begin End x y z Ground
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Geometry Roads
Name Height Coordinates Dist LSlope
Begin End x y z Ground (m) (%)
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Casa Verde Way 0.00 r 10601702.16 4050807.05 11.69 11.69 10601710.47 4050767.70 11.02 11.02
10601715.83 4050740.42 12.12 12.12
10601717.91 4050729.38 13.81 13.81
10601725.14 4050692.70 16.79 16.79
10601732.03 4050657.51 16.48 16.48
10601749.85 4050568.84 12.23 12.23
N Fremont Street 10602058.59 4050742.09 18.00 18.28
10601775.12 4050686.40 18.00 17.68
10601735.44 4050678.53 17.00 17.07
10601721.10 4050675.73 17.00 16.76
10601655.07 4050662.85 15.00 14.94
10601557.76 4050643.18 13.00 12.19
Geometry Railways
Name Height Coordinates
Begin End x y z Ground
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Salter #21-0580
Geometry Roads
Name Height Coordinates Dist LSlope
Begin End x y z Ground (m) (%)
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Casa Verde Way 0.00 r 10601702.16 4050807.05 11.69 11.69 10601710.47 4050767.70 11.02 11.02
10601715.83 4050740.42 12.12 12.12
10601717.91 4050729.38 13.81 13.81
10601725.14 4050692.70 16.79 16.79
10601732.03 4050657.51 16.48 16.48
10601749.85 4050568.84 12.23 12.23
N Fremont Street 10602058.59 4050742.09 18.00 18.28
10601775.12 4050686.40 18.00 17.68
10601735.44 4050678.53 17.00 17.07
10601721.10 4050675.73 17.00 16.76
10601655.07 4050662.85 15.00 14.94
10601557.76 4050643.18 13.00 12.19
Geometry Barriers
Name M. ID Absorption Z-Ext. Cantilever Height Coordinates left right horz. vert. Begin End x y z Ground
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Retaining Wall 1 ft (E) + 0.30 r 10601793.25 4050707.34 17.88 17.58 10601785.57 4050742.92 14.01 13.71
10601778.36 4050741.27 14.01 13.71
10601778.20 4050741.95 13.91 13.61
10601738.05 4050732.76 14.61 14.31
Retaining Wall 2 ft (N) - 15.55 a 10601778.57 4050740.35 15.55 15.00 10601778.67 4050739.93 15.55 15.00
10601785.48 4050741.45 15.55 15.00
Retaining Wall 7 ft (NE) &.5ft RW + 17.29 a 10601778.57 4050740.36 17.29 15.00 10601755.90 4050735.33 17.29 14.98
Retaining Wall 7 ft (N) & 0.5ft RW + 17.29 a 10601778.56 4050740.36 17.29 15.00 10601778.66 4050739.93 17.29 15.00
10601785.48 4050741.45 17.29 15.00
Retaining Wall 5.5 ft (NW) + 15.55 a 10601755.88 4050735.54 15.55 14.39 10601742.12 4050732.53 15.55 14.66
Retaining Wall 6 ft (E) - 16.83 a 10601785.48 4050741.45 16.83 15.00 10601786.94 4050734.80 16.83 15.00

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 446, Packet Page 449 APPENDIX B: Cadna/A Model Inputs/Outputs
Geometry Barriers
Name M. ID Absorption Z-Ext. Cantilever Height Coordinates left right horz. vert. Begin End x y z Ground
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
Retaining Wall 1 ft (E) + 0.30 r 10601793.25 4050707.34 17.88 17.58 10601785.57 4050742.92 14.01 13.71
10601778.36 4050741.27 14.01 13.71
10601778.20 4050741.95 13.91 13.61
10601738.05 4050732.76 14.61 14.31
Retaining Wall 2 ft (N) - 15.55 a 10601778.57 4050740.35 15.55 15.00 10601778.67 4050739.93 15.55 15.00
10601785.48 4050741.45 15.55 15.00
Retaining Wall 7 ft (NE) &.5ft RW + 17.29 a 10601778.57 4050740.36 17.29 15.00 10601755.90 4050735.33 17.29 14.98
Retaining Wall 7 ft (N) & 0.5ft RW + 17.29 a 10601778.56 4050740.36 17.29 15.00 10601778.66 4050739.93 17.29 15.00
10601785.48 4050741.45 17.29 15.00
Retaining Wall 5.5 ft (NW) + 15.55 a 10601755.88 4050735.54 15.55 14.39 10601742.12 4050732.53 15.55 14.66
Retaining Wall 6 ft (E) - 16.83 a 10601785.48 4050741.45 16.83 15.00 10601786.94 4050734.80 16.83 15.00
Geometry Buildings
Name M. ID RB Residents Absorption Height Coordinates
Begin x y z Ground
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 24.00 a 10601833.60 4050637.42 24.00 15.78 10601826.19 4050673.68 24.00 17.27
10601813.88 4050671.17 24.00 17.28
10601821.02 4050634.64 24.00 15.57
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 23.00 a 10601809.91 4050671.17 23.00 17.31 10601815.33 4050644.70 23.00 16.13
10601801.04 4050641.52 23.00 15.89
10601796.01 4050668.26 23.00 17.32
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a 10601794.95 4050665.61 22.00 17.24 10601749.03 4050655.68 22.00 16.45
10601748.63 4050658.73 22.00 16.65
10601794.56 4050668.52 22.00 17.34
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a 10601849.80 4050738.58 22.00 17.01 10601827.87 4050734.42 22.00 17.01
10601832.79 4050714.32 22.00 17.98
10601854.55 4050718.91 22.00 17.98
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 24.00 a 10601787.64 4050735.22 24.00 14.35 10601806.03 4050738.84 24.00 15.81
10601807.60 4050731.70 24.00 16.85
10601789.27 4050727.92 24.00 16.83
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a 10601794.47 4050728.86 22.00 16.88 10601795.37 4050724.50 22.00 17.08
10601803.66 4050726.23 22.00 17.11
10601802.72 4050730.65 22.00 16.86
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 17.00 a 10601703.58 4050735.76 17.00 12.36 10601680.29 4050731.13 17.00 12.11
10601684.13 4050709.69 17.00 13.46
10601707.68 4050714.38 17.00 14.78
10601706.16 4050721.80 17.00 13.72
10601690.41 4050718.69 17.00 13.08
10601689.22 4050725.44 17.00 12.82
10601704.90 4050728.74 17.00 12.62
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 20.00 a 10601700.40 4050709.16 20.00 14.80 10601701.60 4050702.94 20.00 15.21
10601688.96 4050700.36 20.00 14.87
10601687.83 4050706.71 20.00 14.02
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 18.00 a 10601753.71 4050800.60 18.00 11.91 10601744.36 4050791.36 18.00 11.29
Salter #21-0580
Geometry Buildings
Name M. ID RB Residents Absorption Height Coordinates
Begin x y z Ground
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 24.00 a 10601833.60 4050637.42 24.00 15.78 10601826.19 4050673.68 24.00 17.27
10601813.88 4050671.17 24.00 17.28
10601821.02 4050634.64 24.00 15.57
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 23.00 a 10601809.91 4050671.17 23.00 17.31 10601815.33 4050644.70 23.00 16.13
10601801.04 4050641.52 23.00 15.89
10601796.01 4050668.26 23.00 17.32
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a 10601794.95 4050665.61 22.00 17.24 10601749.03 4050655.68 22.00 16.45
10601748.63 4050658.73 22.00 16.65
10601794.56 4050668.52 22.00 17.34
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a 10601849.80 4050738.58 22.00 17.01 10601827.87 4050734.42 22.00 17.01
10601832.79 4050714.32 22.00 17.98
10601854.55 4050718.91 22.00 17.98
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 24.00 a 10601787.64 4050735.22 24.00 14.35 10601806.03 4050738.84 24.00 15.81
10601807.60 4050731.70 24.00 16.85
10601789.27 4050727.92 24.00 16.83
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 22.00 a 10601794.47 4050728.86 22.00 16.88 10601795.37 4050724.50 22.00 17.08
10601803.66 4050726.23 22.00 17.11
10601802.72 4050730.65 22.00 16.86
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 17.00 a 10601703.58 4050735.76 17.00 12.36 10601680.29 4050731.13 17.00 12.11
10601684.13 4050709.69 17.00 13.46
10601707.68 4050714.38 17.00 14.78
10601706.16 4050721.80 17.00 13.72
10601690.41 4050718.69 17.00 13.08
10601689.22 4050725.44 17.00 12.82
10601704.90 4050728.74 17.00 12.62
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 20.00 a 10601700.40 4050709.16 20.00 14.80 10601701.60 4050702.94 20.00 15.21
10601688.96 4050700.36 20.00 14.87
10601687.83 4050706.71 20.00 14.02
21-0370 Surrounding + x 0 0.50 18.00 a 10601753.71 4050800.60 18.00 11.91 10601744.36 4050791.36 18.00 11.29

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 447, Packet Page 450 APPENDIX B: Cadna/A Model Inputs/Outputs
Name M. ID RB Residents Absorption Height Coordinates
Begin x y z Ground
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
10601756.65 4050779.81 18.00 12.10
10601766.10 4050789.26 18.00 12.71
21-0370 Demo1 - x 0 0.50 20.00 a 10601748.55 4050714.65 20.00 16.05 10601744.78 4050713.85 20.00 15.91
10601744.15 4050716.76 20.00 15.75
10601739.06 4050715.74 20.00 15.52
10601739.29 4050714.61 20.00 15.62
10601731.22 4050712.99 20.00 15.15
10601731.65 4050710.58 20.00 15.39
10601730.06 4050710.35 20.00 14.97
10601732.44 4050697.61 20.00 16.87
10601751.33 4050701.28 20.00 17.27
21-0370 Demo2 - x 0 0.50 20.00 a 10601784.90 4050706.65 20.00 17.96 10601792.36 4050708.23 20.00 17.89
10601784.53 4050742.10 20.00 13.70
10601738.05 4050732.86 20.00 14.30
10601742.36 4050713.64 20.00 15.83
10601749.03 4050715.08 20.00 16.06
10601746.77 4050726.14 20.00 15.59
10601779.54 4050732.75 20.00 15.56
21-0370 Demo3 (Pool Slab) - x 0 0.50 15.00 a 10601738.58 4050730.47 15.00 14.99 10601726.82 4050728.06 15.00 14.96
10601731.39 4050703.11 15.00 16.03
10601741.71 4050716.37 15.00 15.63
21-0370 Project Building + x 0 0.50 26.46 a 10601735.57 4050698.16 26.46 16.93 10601743.46 4050699.67 26.46 17.10
10601743.26 4050700.79 26.46 17.00
10601745.94 4050701.31 26.46 17.06
10601746.14 4050700.23 26.46 17.16
10601750.16 4050701.03 26.46 17.25
10601750.30 4050700.28 26.46 17.32
10601758.78 4050702.07 26.46 17.49
10601758.57 4050703.09 26.46 17.39
10601769.67 4050705.29 26.46 17.63
10601769.90 4050704.10 26.46 17.75
10601771.64 4050704.47 26.46 17.78
10601771.44 4050705.36 26.46 17.70
10601772.91 4050705.64 26.46 17.73
10601772.99 4050705.38 26.46 17.76
10601779.99 4050706.78 26.46 17.95
10601778.57 4050713.17 26.46 17.53
10601771.98 4050711.84 26.46 17.37
10601771.69 4050713.43 26.46 17.31
10601772.84 4050713.70 26.46 17.36
10601771.39 4050720.38 26.46 17.09
10601758.68 4050717.80 26.46 16.49
10601758.85 4050716.87 26.46 16.53
10601755.80 4050716.24 26.46 16.39
10601755.24 4050719.02 26.46 16.27
10601749.15 4050717.80 26.46 15.99
10601749.45 4050715.98 26.46 16.06
10601747.66 4050715.65 26.46 15.97
10601747.40 4050716.81 26.46 15.92
10601745.91 4050716.51 26.46 15.85
10601746.31 4050714.29 26.46 15.94
10601741.89 4050713.43 26.46 15.83
10601741.49 4050715.55 26.46 15.65
10601738.86 4050715.02 26.46 15.57
10601738.37 4050717.37 26.46 15.49
10601732.13 4050716.15 26.46 15.07
10601732.79 4050712.32 26.46 15.44
10601732.11 4050712.21 26.46 15.41
10601732.54 4050709.36 26.46 15.70
Salter #21-0580

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 448, Packet Page 451 APPENDIX B: Cadna/A Model Inputs/Outputs
Name M. ID RB Residents Absorption Height Coordinates
Begin x y z Ground
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
10601733.24 4050709.50 26.46 15.74
10601734.45 4050702.37 26.46 16.48
10601734.83 4050702.45 26.46 16.49
21-0370 Impacted Building + x 0 0.50 20.00 a 10601760.37 4050776.78 20.00 12.83 10601742.28 4050759.02 20.00 12.82
10601751.45 4050749.18 20.00 13.10
10601763.46 4050760.35 20.00 13.12
10601780.47 4050743.60 20.00 13.62
10601783.47 4050746.51 20.00 13.62
10601788.05 4050741.43 20.00 13.77
10601792.80 4050746.35 20.00 13.77
Geometry Terrain Contours
Name M. ID OnlyPts Height Coordinates
Begin End x y z
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
+ 10601734.78 4050696.98 17.00
10601780.57 4050705.98 18.00
10601778.91 4050713.52 17.50
10601770.84 4050722.52 17.00
10601738.88 4050715.84 15.50
10601738.48 4050717.62 15.50
10601731.14 4050715.97 15.00
10601734.80 4050696.90 17.00
+ 10601785.51 4050741.48 15.00
10601778.68 4050739.94 15.00
10601778.58 4050740.37 15.00
10601738.55 4050731.63 14.94
10601726.81 4050729.08 14.94
10601730.28 4050710.52 14.94
10601733.64 4050692.43 17.68
10601772.77 4050700.18 17.68
10601793.82 4050704.08 17.68
10601789.27 4050725.15 17.00
10601787.35 4050733.32 15.00
10601786.00 4050739.25 15.00
+ 10601793.10 4050706.29 18.00
10601830.53 4050713.46 18.00
10601826.12 4050734.30 17.00
10601850.54 4050738.97 17.00
10601825.15 4050763.41 16.00
10601811.39 4050776.33 15.00
10601800.99 4050786.20 14.00
10601791.01 4050795.76 13.00
10601783.63 4050802.94 13.00
10601763.15 4050780.88 13.00
10601770.22 4050774.44 13.00
10601781.25 4050764.46 14.00
10601791.96 4050755.01 15.00
10601806.32 4050741.91 16.00
10601808.32 4050731.40 17.00
10601788.88 4050727.31 17.00
+ 10601741.06 4050793.10 11.00
10601757.57 4050777.43 12.00
10601723.05 4050742.58 12.00
10601717.96 4050769.09 11.00
10601740.73 4050792.85 12.00
+ 10601723.42 4050741.21 12.80
10601761.11 4050779.85 12.80
10601802.74 4050739.24 14.02
10601786.89 4050735.98 14.02
10601785.49 4050742.05 13.72
Salter #21-0580
Name M. ID OnlyPts Height Coordinates
Begin End x y z
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
10601726.70 4050729.35 14.64
10601723.49 4050740.87 12.80

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 449, Packet Page 452 UP
DN
UP

NORTH FREMONT STREET

CASA VERDE WAY
15 11
14 42 TOTAL PARKING SPACES
BASEMENT FF: 53.44'
FIRST FLOOR FF: 63.44'
18'-0" 25'-0" 18'-0" 5'-2" LANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE

DESIGNATED PARKING DROP-OFF
18'-7"
16'-4"
TRASH

MAIN ENTRY FROM NORTH FREMONT

MAIN ENTRY FROM CASA VERDE WAY (BASEMENT LEVEL)

ADJACENT

COMMERCIAL

PROPERTY

ADJACENT

RESIDENTIAL

PROPERTY

PROPERTY LINE

LANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE

SIDEWALK

SIDEWALK
N 79°07'50" E 141.04'
N 79°07'50" E 22.42'
S 10°52'10" E 1.90'
S 10°57'15" E 125.19'
S 79°02'45" W 171.51'
N 10°57'15" W 113.47'
N 78°36'05" E 39.83' N 11°35'10" W 12.55'
S 79°02'45" W 31.64'
N 10°57'15" W 1.00'

TYPICAL
9'-0"
18'-0"

LANDSCAPE
RAMP

EXISTING DRIVEWAY APRON TO BE UPDATED PER CITY STANDARDS

PROPOSED NEW DRIVEWAY APRON

ADJACENT

PARKING LOT

ADJACENT

PARKING LOT
(NOT A PART)
(NOT A PART)
(NOT A PART)
(NOT A PART)

ADJACENT

CARPORT
(NOT A PART)
STAIR #2
STAIR #1
RAMP

ROLL UP DOOR
10'-0"

LINE OF AWNING ABOVE(SHOWN DASHED) VAN ACCESSIBLE

PARKING STALL

STANDARD ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL
9'-0" 26'-0"

BUILDING ABOVE (SHOWN DASHED)COVERED PARKING SPACE

TYPICAL
9'-0"
4'-0"
16'-4" 4'-7" 10"
K CABTES. NI M' 01
" 1'- 01

RETAINING WALL

LANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE

L A ICPYT
" 0'- 9

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

LANDSCAPE

LANDSCAPE

MIN SETBACK
10'-0"
24'-0" 18'-0"
K CABTES. IN M
" 0'- 6 12'-5"
" 5'- 31
" 5'- 11
MIN. SETBACK
10'-0"
" 5'- 11
42'-9"

PLANTER

DRIVEWAY FIRE TURN RADIUS
16'-0"
R 25 -' 0"
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
3'-11"
" 4'- 4
" 11'- 4

LANDSCAPE
" 7'- 5
10'-0" 10'-0"

LANDSCAPE
3 A2.1
1 A2.1
2 A2.1
STUCCO WALL ON TOP OF RETAINING WALL TO REACH 12' IN HEIGHT FROM TOP OF ADJACENT GRADE 4 A2.1
" 5'- 8 " 0'- 42

T NE MES AE
EP ACS DNAL " 0'- 5

T NE MES AE
EP ACS DNAL " 0'- 5
" 0'- 21
" 0'- 21

T NE MES AE
EP ACS DNAL " 0'- 5

EASEMENT
5'-0" LANDSCAPE
9'-0"

COMPACT
" 0'- 61 8'-6"
" 0'- 01 " 0'- 9
" 6'- 83'-9" 18'-0"

COVERED LOADING SPACECOVERED PARKING SPACE

COMPACT
25'-6"

LOADING
23'-1"
STUCCO WALL ON TOP OF RETAINING WALL TO REACH 6' IN HEIGHT FROM ADJACENT GRADE(FIRST SIX STALLS THIS ROW) 5 A2.1
8'-0"
R 23 -' 3"
R 29 -' 0"

DELIVERY TRUCK TURN RADIUS
4' TALL FENCE OR STUCCO WALL FOR THE FIRST 20' LENGTH OFF OF STREET6' TALL FENCE OR STUCCO WALL ALONG 5' EASEMENT STUCCO WALL ON TOP OF RETAINING WALL TO REACH 12' IN HEIGHT FROM TOP OF ADJACENT GRADE DateScaleSheet
24x36:
11x17:

ADDRESS1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401805.547.2240ARRISTHOMAS E. JESSARCHITECT (CA) #C27068STEPHEN A. RIGORARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 -STUDIO.COM

CONTACT
A2.0
10/14/2020 2101 N FREMONT
1/8" = 1' - 0"
MONTEREY, CA 1/16" = 1' - 0"

ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN

PROJECT
NORTH

ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
TRUE
NORTH
APPENDIX C: PROJECT DRAWINGS Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 450, Packet Page 453 9'-0" 3'-11"

PROPERTY LINEEXISTING CURB TO REMAIN

PLANTER

PARKING
LOT

PARKING
LOT
LINE OF 5' LANDSCAPE EASEMENTSOLID STUCCO WALL ON TOP OF RETAINING WALLRETAINING WALL 5'-0"
FROM ADJ. GRADE
12'-0"
10'-0"
1'-0"
PLANTING STRIP ON ADJ. PROPERTYRETAINING WALL

PARKING
LOT

NEIGHBORING

BUILDING PLANTER

PARKING
LOT

PARKING
LOT

PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN
LINE OF 5' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT

SOLID STUCCO WALL ON TOP OF RETAINING WALL
5'-0"
FROM ADJ. GRADE
12'-0"
7'-2" 4'-10" PLANTER
10'-6" 2'-0"

PROPERTY LINE

PLANTERRETAINING WALL

PARKING
LOT

PARKING
LOT

LINE OF LANDSCAPE EASMENT
5'-0"

EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN
SOLID STUCCO WALL ON TOP OF RETAINING WALL 11'-6"
FROM ADJ. GRADE
12'-0"
5'-2" 9"

PROPERTY LINE

PLANTERRETAINING WALL

PARKING
LOT

PARKING
LOT

LINE OF LANDSCAPE EASMENT
5'-0"

EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN

SOLID STUCCO WALL ON TOP OF RETAINING WALL

TO ADJACENT GRADE
6'-0"
DateScaleSheet
24x36:
11x17:

ADDRESS1327 ARCHER STREET, STE. 220SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401805.547.2240ARRISTHOMAS E. JESSARCHITECT (CA) #C27068STEPHEN A. RIGORARCHITECT (CA) #C33672 -STUDIO.COM

CONTACT
A2.1
05/06/21 2101 N FREMONT

MONTEREY, CA

SITE SECTIONS
SITE SECTION - 3SITE SECTION - 1 SITE SECTION - 2
SITE SECTION - 4
SITE SECTION - 5
APPENDIX C: PROJECT DRAWINGS Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 451, Packet Page 454 WW
E/yKE^dZhd/KE
Yh/WD
Ed>/^d
s/,Kd
>ͲDKEd
Z
zĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞ ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ
ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚϭϯŵŽŶƚŚĚƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ ϭ Ϯ ϯ ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϮ ϭϯ WůĞĂƐĞŶŽƚĞĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚůŝƐƚĞĚǁŝůůŶŽƚĂůůďĞƵƐĞĚĂƚƚŚĞƐĂŵĞƚŝŵĞĂŶĚŵĂLJďĞƵƚŝůŝnjĞĚŝŶƐŚŽƌƚŝŶƚĞƌǀĂůƐĂƚǀĂƌŝŽƵƐƉŽŝŶƚƐĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϭ ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϭ ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϮ ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϯ ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϰ ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϱ ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϲ ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϳ ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϴ ĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ ĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ 'ƌĂĚŝŶŐ
džĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ &ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐͲƐŝƚĞΘďůĚŐ ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĨƌĂŵĞ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌƐ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƐ ^ŝƚĞŚĂƌĚͬƐŽĨƚƐĐĂƉĞƐ &&Θ ĨŝƚƵƉ
͘ϱŵŽŶƚŚ hŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚhƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ hŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚhƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ
ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϮ ĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŽƌ ĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŽƌ ŵŝŶŝĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŽƌ ŐƌĂĚĂůůĨŽƌŬůŝĨƚ ƌŽŽĨƚŽŽƉĐƌĂŶĞ ŐLJƉĐƌĞƚĞƉƵŵƉ ƐŬŝĚƐƚĞĞƌůŽĂĚĞƌ ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ 'ƌĂĚŝŶŐͬ
džĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĞdžĐĂǀĂƚŽƌƌĂŵŚŽĞ ůŽĂĚĞƌ ďĂĐŬŚŽĞ ƚƌƵƐƐĐƌĂŶĞ ďŽŽŵůŝĨƚ ŐƌĂĚĂůůĨŽƌŬůŝĨƚ ϭϬǁŚĞĞůƚƌƵĐŬhŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚhƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ ĚƵŵƉƚƌƵĐŬƐ ƐŬŝƉůŽĂĚĞƌ ƐŬŝĚƐƚĞĞƌůŽĂĚĞƌ ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ ƐƚƵĐĐŽƉƵŵƉ ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ ƉĂǀŝŶŐŵĂĐŚŝŶĞ ϭŵŽŶƚŚ ƐĂǁĐƵƚƚĞƌ ƐŚĞĞƉƐĨŽŽƚĐŽŵƉĂĐƚŽƌ ƐŬŝƉůŽĂĚĞƌ ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ ƌŽůůĞƌ ϭϬǁŚĞĞůƚƌƵĐŬ ϭϬǁŚĞĞůƚƌƵĐŬ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƚƌƵĐŬ
ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϯ ďĂĐŬŚŽĞ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƚƌƵĐŬ ůŝŶĞƉƵŵƉ
&ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐͲƐŝƚĞΘďůĚŐ ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ ŵƉƵŵƉ ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ hŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚhƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ ůŝŶĞƉƵŵƉ
ϯŵŽŶƚŚ ĐŽŵƉĂĐƚŽƌ
ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ
ĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϰ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĨƌĂŵĞϮ͘ϱŵŽŶƚŚƐĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϱƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
džƚĞƌŝŽƌƐϮ͘ϱŵŽŶƚŚƐĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϲƵŝůĚŝŶŐ/ŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƐϱ͘ϱŵŽŶƚŚĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϳ^ŝƚĞŚĂƌĚͬƐŽĨƚƐĐĂƉĞϯŵŽŶƚŚƐĐƚŝǀŝƚLJϴ&&Θ ĨŝƚƵƉϭŵŽŶƚŚ
Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 452, Packet Page 455 '
E
Z>^^
^^D
EdͲZ/d
Z/KE͗DĂdžϵϬĚ
WŚĂƐĞϭͲĞŵŽůŝƚŝŽŶ͕
džĐĂǀĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚ'ƌĂĚŝŶŐ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ DĂdž^W>ĂƚϱϬĨƚ;ĚͿ
ϭŚƌ>ĞƋĂƚWƌŽũĞĐƚĞŶƚĞƌ;ϲϮ͘ϱĨƚͿͲ
Ě

džĐĂǀĂƚŽƌ ϴϱ
,ŽĞZĂŵ ϵϬ ϴϴ
ƵŵƉdƌƵĐŬ ϴϰ
^ĂǁĐƵƚƚĞƌ ϵϬ ϴϴ
>ŽĂĚĞƌ ϴϬ
^ŚĞĞƉΖƐĨŽŽƚĐŽŵƉĂĐƚŽƌ ϴϬ
ĂĐŬŚŽĞ ϴϬ
ϭϬͲtŚĞĞůƚƌƵĐŬ ϴϰ
ĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ ϱϱ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŶŽŝƐĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌ;ϳĨƚĂďŽǀĞƌĞƚĂŝŶŝŶŐǁĂůůͿ Ͳϰ dŽƚĂů ϴϳ
WŚĂƐĞϮͲhƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ DĂdž^W>ĂƚϱϬĨƚ;ĚͿ
ϭŚƌ>ĞƋĂƚWƌŽũĞĐƚĞŶƚĞƌ;ϲϮ͘ϱĨƚͿͲ
Ě

džĐĂǀĂƚŽƌ ϴϱ ϴϯ
>ŽĂĚĞƌ ϴϬ
^ŚĞĞƉΖƐĨŽŽƚĐŽŵƉĂĐƚŽƌ ϴϬ
ĂĐŬŚŽĞ ϴϬ
ϭϬͲtŚĞĞůƚƌƵĐŬ ϴϰ ϴϮ
ŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƚƌƵĐŬ ϴϮ
ĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ ϱϱ
ŽŽŵƉƵŵƉ ϳϳ
>ŝŶĞƉƵŵƉ ϳϳ
ŽŵƉĂĐƚŽƌ ϴϬ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŶŽŝƐĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌ;ϳĨƚĂďŽǀĞƌĞƚĂŝŶŝŶŐǁĂůůͿ Ͳϰ dŽƚĂů ϴϭ
WŚĂƐĞϯͲ&ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ DĂdž^W>ĂƚϱϬĨƚ;ĚͿ
ϭŚƌ>ĞƋĂƚWƌŽũĞĐƚĞŶƚĞƌ;ϲϮ͘ϱĨƚͿͲ
Ě

džĐĂǀĂƚŽƌ ϴϱ ϴϯ
ĂĐŬŚŽĞ ϴϬ
>ŽĂĚĞƌ ϴϬ
ϭϬͲtŚĞĞůƚƌƵĐŬ ϴϰ
ŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƚƌƵĐŬ ϴϮ
ŽŽŵƉƵŵƉ ϳϳ
>ŝŶĞƉƵŵƉ ϳϳ
ŽŵƉĂĐƚŽƌ ϴϬ
'ƌĂĚĂůůĨŽƌŬůŝĨƚ ϴϱ ϴϯ
dƌƵƐƐĐƌĂŶĞ ϴϱ
ĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ ϱϱ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŶŽŝƐĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌ;ϳĨƚĂďŽǀĞƌĞƚĂŝŶŝŶŐǁĂůůͿ Ͳϰ dŽƚĂů ϴϮ
APPENDIX E: FTA CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS WW
E/y͗&dŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶEŽŝƐĞŶĂůLJƐŝƐ

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 453, Packet Page 456 '
E
Z>^^
^^D
EdͲZ/d
Z/KE͗DĂdžϵϬĚ
WŚĂƐĞϰͲƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
džƚĞƌŝŽƌ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ DĂdž^W>ĂƚϱϬĨƚ;ĚͿ
ϭŚƌ>ĞƋĂƚWƌŽũĞĐƚĞŶƚĞƌ;ϲϮ͘ϱĨƚͿͲ
Ě
ZŽŽĨƚŽƉĐƌĂŶĞ ϴϱ ϴϯ
ŽŽŵůŝĨƚ ϴϱ ϴϯ
^ƚƵĐĐŽƉƵŵƉ ϳϳ
ĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ ϱϱ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŶŽŝƐĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌ;ϳĨƚĂďŽǀĞƌĞƚĂŝŶŝŶŐǁĂůůͿ Ͳϰ dŽƚĂů ϴϮ
WŚĂƐĞϱͲƵŝůĚŝŶŐ/ŶƚĞƌŝŽƌ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ DĂdž^W>ĂƚϱϬĨƚ;ĚͿ
ϭŚƌ>ĞƋĂƚWƌŽũĞĐƚĞŶƚĞƌ;ϲϮ͘ϱĨƚͿͲ
Ě
'LJƉĐƌĞƚĞƉƵŵƉ ϳϳ ϳϱ
'ƌĂĚĂůůĨŽƌŬůŝĨƚ ϴϱ ϴϯ
ĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ ϱϱ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŶŽŝƐĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌ;ϳĨƚĂďŽǀĞƌĞƚĂŝŶŝŶŐǁĂůůͿ Ͳϰ dŽƚĂů ϳϵ
WŚĂƐĞϲͲ,ĂƌĚƐĐĂƉĞĂŶĚ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ DĂdž^W>ĂƚϱϬĨƚ;ĚͿ
ϭŚƌ>ĞƋĂƚWƌŽũĞĐƚĞŶƚĞƌ;ϲϮ͘ϱĨƚͿͲ
Ě
^ŬŝĚƐƚĞĞƌůŽĂĚĞƌ ϴϬ
ϭϬͲtŚĞĞůƚƌƵĐŬ ϴϰ
WĂǀŝŶŐŵĂĐŚŝŶĞ ϴϱ ϴϯ
ZŽůůĞƌ ϴϱ ϴϯ
ŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƚƌƵĐŬ ϴϮ
>ŝŶĞƉƵŵƉ ϳϳ
ĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚƌƵĐŬ ϱϱ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŶŽŝƐĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌ;ϳĨƚĂďŽǀĞƌĞƚĂŝŶŝŶŐǁĂůůͿ Ͳϰ dŽƚĂů ϴϮ
APPENDIX E: FTA CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS WW
E/y͗&dŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶEŽŝƐĞŶĂůLJƐŝƐ

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 454, Packet Page 457 Appendix E-1
Air Quality Emissions Study

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 455, Packet Page 458 2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
Air Quality Emissions Study
prepared for
Arris Studio Architects
1221 SW Yamhill Street, Suite 300
Portland, Oregon 97205
Contact: Adriana Cook
prepared by
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
437 Figueroa Street, Suite 203
Monterey, California 93940
October 2020

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 456, Packet Page 459 2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
Air Quality Emissions Study
prepared for
Arris Studio Architects
1221 SW Yamhill Street, Suite 300
Portland, OR 97205
Contact: Adriana Cook
prepared by
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
437 Figueroa Street, Suite 203
Monterey, California 93940
October 2020

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 457, Packet Page 460 This report prepared on 50 percent recycled paper with 50 percent post-consumer content.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 458, Packet Page 461 Table of Contents
Air Quality Emissions Study i
Table of Contents
1 Project Description .........................................................................................................................1

1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1

1.2 Project Summary .................................................................................................................1

1.2.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................1

1.2.2 Project Description .............................................................................................4

1.2.3 Construction .......................................................................................................4 2 Air Quality .......................................................................................................................................6

2.1 Environmental and Regulatory Setting ...............................................................................6

2.1.1 Local Climate and Meteorology ..........................................................................6

2.1.2 Air Pollutants of Primary Concern ......................................................................7

2.1.3 Air Quality Regulation .........................................................................................9

2.1.4 Current Air Quality ........................................................................................... 11

2.2 Impact Analysis ................................................................................................................ 13

2.2.1 Methodology ................................................................................................... 13

2.2.2 Significance Thresholds ................................................................................... 14

2.2.3 Impact Analysis ................................................................................................ 16 3 References ................................................................................................................................... 22 Tables
Table 1 Summary of Impacts ...........................................................................................................1 Table 2 Construction Schedule ........................................................................................................4 Table 3 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards ..............................................................9 Table 4 Ambient Air Quality Data (2017-2019) ............................................................................ 12 Table 5 Air Quality Thresholds of Significance ............................................................................. 15 Table 6 Project Construction Emissions ....................................................................................... 17 Table 7 Estimated Maximum Operational Emissions ................................................................... 18 Figures
Figure 1 Regional Location ................................................................................................................2 Figure 2 Project Site ..........................................................................................................................3 Figure 3 Site Plans .............................................................................................................................5 Appendices
Appendix A California Emissions Estimator Model Output

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 459, Packet Page 462 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
ii
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 460, Packet Page 463 Project Description
Air Quality Emissions Study 1
1 Project Description

1.1 Introduction
This study analyzes the potential air quality impacts of the proposed 2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project (project or proposed project) located at 2101 N. Fremont Street in the City of Monterey, Monterey County, California. Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) prepared this study for Arris Studio Architects (applicant) for use in support of environmental documentation being prepared for the City of Monterey for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The purpose of this study is to analyze the project’s air quality impacts related to both temporary construction activity and long-term operation of the project. The conclusions of this study are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Summary of Impacts
Impact Statement
Proposed Project’s
Level of Significance
Applicable
Recommendations
Air Quality
Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No Impact None
Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Less than significant impact None
Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Less than significant impact None
Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Less than significant impact None

1.2 Project Summary

1.2.1 Project Location
The project site is located in the eastern portion of the City of Monterey in Monterey County, and consists of a 0.58-acre parcel (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 013-112-045-000) located on the northeast corner of North Fremont Street and Casa Verde Way, at 2101 N. Fremont Street. The project site is bordered by multi-family residential development to the north and commercial development to the east and south as well as commercial and multi-family residential development to the west. The project site is fully developed and currently contains a hotel and vacant restaurant.

The site is within the North Fremont Specific Plan and the parcel is zoned as Visitor Accommodation Facility (VAF). Figure 1 shows the project site’s regional location and Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the project site and surrounding area.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 461, Packet Page 464 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
2 Figure 1 Regional Location

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 462, Packet Page 465 Project Description
Air Quality Emissions Study 3
Figure 2 Project Site

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 463, Packet Page 466 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
4 1.2.2 Project Description
This proposed project would involve the demolition of an existing one-story, 18 guest room hotel and restaurant and the construction of a new three-story, 42 guest room branded hotel. The site would include surface parking in the rear of the site and two parking spaces under the building. The project would have two main entrance lobbies, one off of North Fremont Street and the other off of Casa Verde Way. A partial basement would be used to accommodate an accessible entry and to keep the parking lot in the rear of the site.

The applicant is seeking a conditional use permit for the use of a hotel, a variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces, and a variance to reduce the North Fremont Street setback from the required 10 feet to the proposed six feet. Please see Figure 3 for the project site plan.

1.2.3 Construction
Project construction is expected to commence in January 2022 with full buildout completed by May 2023. Site preparation and demolition would occur in January 2022, followed by grading which is scheduled to start in February 2022 and last approximately four months. The project would require the export of approximately 1,010 cubic yards of material from the site during grading. Building construction would begin in May 2022 and last a year. Asphalt paving and architectural coating would occur concurrently throughout the construction process and would begin in January 2023 and November 2022, respectively. A construction schedule is provided in Table 2.

Table 2 Construction Schedule
Construction Phase Start Date End Date
Start Date for Construction January 2022 -
Site Preparation and Demolition January 2022 February 2022 Grading February 2022 May 2022
Building Construction May 2022 May 2023
Asphalt Paving1 January 2023 January 2023
Architectural Coating1 November 2022 May 2023
Completion Date for All Construction - May 2023
Notes:
1 Asphalt paving and architectural coating would occur concurrently throughout the construction process.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 464, Packet Page 467 Project Description
Air Quality Emissions Study 5 Figure 3 Site Plans
Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 465, Packet Page 468 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
6 2 Air Quality

2.1 Environmental and Regulatory Setting

2.1.1 Local Climate and Meteorology
Air quality is affected by the rate and location of pollutant emissions and by climatic conditions that influence the movement and dispersion of pollutants. Atmospheric conditions, such as wind speed, wind direction, and air temperature gradients, along with local and regional topography, influence the relationship between air pollutant emissions and air quality.

The proposed project is located in the North Central Coast Air Basin (NCCAB) which is the geographic scope for this analysis, which is comprised of Monterey, Santa Cruz, and San Benito Counties. The NCCAB covers an area of 5,159 square miles. The Diablo Range marks the northeastern boundary and, together with the southern extent of the Santa Cruz Mountains, forms the Santa Clara Valley, which extends into the northeastern tip of the NCCAB. Further south, the Santa Clara Valley transitions into the San Benito Valley, which runs northwest to southeast and has the Gabilan Range as its western boundary. To the west of the Gabilan Range is the Salinas Valley, which extends from Salinas at its northwestern end to King City at its southeastern end. The western side of the Salinas Valley is formed by the Sierra de Salinas, which also forms the eastern side of the smaller Carmel Valley. The coastal Santa Lucia Range defines the western side of the Carmel Valley (Monterey Bay Air Resources District [MBARD] 2008).

The semi-permanent high-pressure cell in the eastern Pacific is the basic controlling factor in the climate of the NCCAB. In the summer, the high-pressure cell is dominant and causes persistent west and northwest winds over the entire California coast. Air descends in the Pacific High-pressure cell, forming a stable temperature inversion of hot air over a layer of cool coastal air. The onshore air currents pass over cool ocean waters to bring fog and relatively cool air into the coastal valleys. The warmer air loft acts as a lid to inhibit vertical air movements (MBARD 2008).

The generally northwest to southeast orientation of mountainous ridges tends to restrict and channel the summer onshore air currents. Surface heating in the interior portion of the Salinas and San Benito Valleys creates a weak low pressure system which intensifies the onshore air flow during the afternoon and evening. In the fall, the surface winds become weak, and the marine layer grows shallow, dissipating altogether on some days. The air flow is occasionally reversed in a weak offshore movement, and the relatively stationary air mass is held in place by the Pacific Highpressure cell, which allows pollutants to build up over a period of a few days. It is most often during this season that north or east winds develop to transport pollutants from either the San Francisco Bay Area or the Central Valley into the NCCAB (MBARD 2008).

During the winter, the Pacific High-pressure cell migrates southward and has less influence on the NCCAB. Air frequently flows in a southeasterly direction out of the Salinas and San Benito Valleys, especially during night and morning hours. Northwest winds are nevertheless still dominant in winter, but easterly flow is more frequent. The general absence of deep, persistent inversions and the occasional storm systems usually result in good air quality for the NCCAB in winter and early spring (MBARD 2008). The proposed project is positioned southeast of Monterey Bay, a 25-mile wide inlet that allows marine air at low levels to penetrate the interior.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 466, Packet Page 469 Air Quality
Air Quality Emissions Study 7

2.1.2 Air Pollutants of Primary Concern
Primary criteria pollutants are emitted directly from a source (e.g., vehicle tailpipe, an exhaust stack of a factory, etc.) into the atmosphere. Primary criteria pollutants include carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter with diameters of up to ten microns (PM10) and up to 2.5 microns (PM2.5), and lead (Pb). Ozone (O3) is considered a secondary criteria pollutant because it is created by atmospheric chemical and photochemical reactions between volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX). The following subsections describe the characteristics, sources, and health and atmospheric effects of critical air contaminants.

Ozone
Ozone is produced by a photochemical reaction (triggered by sunlight) between NOX and VOC.1 NOX are formed during the combustion of fuels, while VOC are formed during combustion and evaporation of organic solvents. Because O3 requires sunlight to form, it usually occurs in substantial concentrations between the months of April and October. Ozone is a pungent, colorless, toxic gas with direct health effects on humans including respiratory and eye irritation and possible changes in lung functions. Groups most sensitive to O3 include children, the elderly, people with respiratory disorders, and people who exercise strenuously outdoors.

Carbon Monoxide
CO is a local pollutant that is found in high concentrations only near fuel combustion equipment and other sources of CO. The primary source of CO, a colorless, odorless, poisonous gas, is automobile traffic. Therefore, elevated concentrations are usually only found near areas of high traffic volumes.

CO’s health effects are related to its affinity for hemoglobin in the blood. At high concentrations, CO reduces the amount of oxygen in the blood, causing heart difficulty in people with chronic diseases, reduced lung capacity, and impaired mental abilities.

Nitrogen Dioxide
NO2 is a by-product of fuel combustion, with the primary source being motor vehicles and industrial boilers and furnaces. The principal form of nitrogen oxide produced by combustion is nitric oxide (NO), but NO reacts rapidly to form NO2, creating the mixture of NO and NO2 commonly called NOX.

NO2 is an acute irritant. A relationship between NO2 and chronic pulmonary fibrosis may exist, and an increase in bronchitis in young children at concentrations below 0.3 parts per million (ppm) may occur. NO2 absorbs blue light, gives a reddish-brown cast to the atmosphere, and reduces visibility.

It can also contribute to the formation of ozone/smog and acid rain.

Suspended Particulates
Atmospheric particulate matter is comprised of finely divided solids and liquids such as dust, soot, aerosols, fumes, and mists. The particulates that are of particular concern are PM10 (small particulate matter which measures no more than 10 microns in diameter) and PM2.5 (fine particulate matter which measures no more than 2.5 microns in diameter). The characteristics, sources, and potential health effects associated with PM10 and PM2.5 can be different. Major man-made sources of PM10 are agricultural operations, industrial processes, combustion of fossil fuels, construction, 1 CARB defines VOC and ROG similarly as, “any compound of carbon excluding CO, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate,” with the exception that VOC are compounds that participate in atmospheric photochemical reactions (CARB 2009). For the purposes of this analysis, ROG and VOC are considered comparable in terms of mass emissions and the term ROG is used in this report. The MBARD uses the term VOC to denote organic precursors.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 467, Packet Page 470 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
8 demolition operations, and entrainment of road dust into the atmosphere. Natural sources include windblown dust, wildfire smoke, and sea spray salt. The finer PM2.5 particulates are generally associated with combustion processes as well as formation in the atmosphere as a secondary pollutant through chemical reactions. PM2.5 is more likely to penetrate deeply into the lungs and poses a serious health threat to all groups, but particularly to the elderly, children, and those with respiratory problems. More than half of the small and fine particulate matter that is inhaled into the lungs remains there, which can cause permanent lung damage. These materials can damage health by interfering with the body’s mechanisms for clearing the respiratory tract or by acting as carriers of an absorbed toxic substance.

Lead
Pb is a metal found naturally in the environment, as well as in manufacturing products. Pb occurs in the atmosphere as particulate matter. The major sources of Pb emissions historically have been mobile and industrial sources. In the early 1970s, the USEPA set national regulations to gradually reduce the Pb content in gasoline. In 1975, unleaded gasoline was introduced for motor vehicles equipped with catalytic converters. The USEPA completed the ban prohibiting the use of leaded gasoline in highway vehicles in December 1995. As a result of the USEPA’s regulatory efforts to remove lead from gasoline, atmospheric lead concentrations have declined substantially over the past several decades. The most dramatic reductions in Pb emissions occurred prior to 1990 due to the removal of Pb from gasoline sold for most highway vehicles. Pb emissions were further reduced substantially between 1990 and 2008, with reductions occurring in the metals industries in part due to national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants. As a result of phasing out leaded gasoline, metal processing is currently the primary source of Pb emissions. The highest levels of Pb in the air are generally found near lead smelters. Other stationary sources include waste incinerators, utilities, and lead-acid battery manufacturers. Lead may cause a range of health effects, including anemia, kidney disease, and neuromuscular and neurological dysfunction (in severe cases). The proposed project does not include any stationary sources of lead emissions.

Therefore, implementation of the project would not result in substantial emissions of lead, and this pollutant is not discussed further in this analysis.

Toxic Air Contaminants
Toxic air contaminants (TACs) are a diverse group of air pollutants that may cause or contribute to an increase in deaths or serious illness or that may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. TACs include both organic and inorganic chemical substances that may be emitted from a variety of common sources, including gasoline stations, motor vehicles, dry cleaners, industrial operations, painting operations, and research and teaching facilities. One of the main sources of TACs in California is diesel engines that emit exhaust containing solid material known as diesel particulate matter (DPM; CARB 2011). TACs are different than the criteria pollutants previously discussed because ambient air quality standards have not been established for TACs. TACs occurring at extremely low levels may still cause health effects, and it is typically difficult to identify levels of exposure that do not produce adverse health effects. TAC impacts are described by carcinogenic risk and by chronic (i.e., of long duration) and acute (i.e., severe but of short duration) adverse effects on human health.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 468, Packet Page 471 Air Quality
Air Quality Emissions Study 9

2.1.3 Air Quality Regulation
The federal and state governments have established ambient air quality standards for the protection of public health. The USEPA is the federal agency designated to administer air quality regulation, while the CARB is the state equivalent within the California EPA. County-level Air Quality Management Districts (AQMDs) provide local management of air quality. CARB has established air quality standards and is responsible for the control of mobile emission sources, while the local AQMDs are responsible for enforcing standards and regulating stationary sources. CARB has established 15 air basins statewide, including the NCCAB.

The USEPA has set primary NAAQS for O3, CO, NO2, PM10, PM2.5, SO2, and Pb. Primary standards are those levels of air quality deemed necessary, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect public health. In addition, California has established health-based ambient air quality standards (CAAQS) for these and other pollutants, some of which are more stringent than the federal standards.

Table 3 lists the current federal and state standards for regulated pollutants.

Table 3 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant Federal Standard California Standard
Ozone 0.070 ppm (8-hr avg) 0.09 ppm (1-hr avg)

0.070 ppm (8-hr avg)
Carbon Monoxide 35.0 ppm (1-hr avg)

9.0 ppm (8-hr avg)

20.0 ppm (1-hr avg)

9.0 ppm (8-hr avg)
Nitrogen Dioxide 0.100 ppm (1-hr avg)

0.053 ppm (annual avg)

0.18 ppm (1-hr avg)

0.030 ppm (annual avg)
Sulfur Dioxide 0.075 ppm (1-hr avg)

0.5 ppm (3-hr avg)

0.14 ppm (24-hr avg)

0.030 ppm (annual avg)

0.25 ppm (1-hr avg)

0.04 ppm (24-hr avg)
Lead 0.15 Pg/m3 (rolling 3-month avg)

1.5 Pg/m3 (calendar quarter)

1.5 Pg/m3 (30-day avg)
Particulate Matter (PM10) 150 Pg/m3 (24-hr avg) 50 Pg/m3 (24-hr avg) 20 Pg/m3 (annual avg)
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 35 Pg/m3 (24-hr avg)
12 Pg/m3 (annual avg)
12 Pg/m3 (annual avg)
Visibility-Reducing Particles No Federal Standards Extinction coefficient of 0.23 per kilometer – visibility of ten miles or more (0.07 - 30 miles
or more for Lake Tahoe) due to particles when
relative humidity is less than 70 percent.

Method: Beta Attenuation and Transmittance
through Filter Tape. (8-hr avg)
Sulfates No Federal Standards 25 Pg/m3 (24-hr avg)
Hydrogen Sulfide No Federal Standards 0.03 ppm (1-hr avg) Vinyl Chloride No Federal Standards 0.01 ppm (24-hr avg) ppm= parts per million; Pg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter Source: CARB 2016

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 469, Packet Page 472 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
10 The MBARD is the designated air quality control agency in the NCCAB. The NCCAB is in attainment for all federal standards and in nonattainment-transitional for the state standard for O3 and nonattainment for PM10. The NCCAB is designated unclassifiable or in attainment for all other state standards.

Monterey Bay Air Resources District
Local control in air quality management is provided by CARB through county-level or regional (multicounty) AQMDs. CARB establishes statewide air quality standards and is responsible for control of mobile emission sources, while the local Air Pollution Control Districts are responsible for enforcing standards and regulating stationary sources. The project area is located in City of Monterey, which is under the jurisdiction of MBARD.2
MBARD is responsible for assuring that the federal and state ambient air quality standards are attained and maintained in the NCCAB. The agency is also responsible for adopting and enforcing rules and regulations concerning air pollutant sources, issuing permits for stationary sources of air pollutants, inspecting stationary sources of air pollutants, responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, awarding grants to reduce motor vehicle emissions, conducting public education campaigns, and other activities.

In March 2017, MBARD adopted the 2012-2015 Air Quality Management Plan (2015 AQMP) as an update to the 2012 AQMP. The 2015 AQMP assesses and updates elements of the 2012 AQMP, including ambient air quality data, emission inventory trends, information on ozone transport, control measures, mobile source programs, emission reduction strategies, and growth forecasts.

This document is incorporated by reference and is available online at https://www.mbard.org/files/6632732f5/2012-2015-AQMP_FINAL.pdf (MBARD 2017). The 2015 AQMP only addresses attainment of the State eight-hour ozone standard because in 2012, the USEPA designated the NCCAB as in attainment for the current national eight-hour ozone standard of

0.075 ppm. In October 2015, the national standard was reduced to 0.070 ppm. However, the NCCAB continues to be in attainment with the Federal ozone standard (MBARD 2017).

The following MBARD rules would limit emissions of air pollutants from construction and operation of the proposed project:
ƒ Rule 400 (Visible Emissions). Discharge of visible air pollutant emissions into the atmosphere from any emission source for a period or periods aggregating more than three minutes in any one hour, as observed using an appropriate test method, is prohibited. ƒ Rule 402 (Nuisances). No person shall discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other materials which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public; or which endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of any such persons or the public; or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.
ƒ Rule 425 (Use of Cutback Asphalt). The use of cutback asphalt (asphalt cement that has been blended with petroleum solvents) and emulsified asphalt (an emulsion of asphalt cement and water with a small amount of emulsifying agent) is restricted to limit VOC emissions. Rule 425 prohibits the use of rapid cure asphalt, restricts the use of medium cure asphalt to November 2 MBARD was formerly called the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution District; accordingly, documents authored by the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution District are cited as authored by MBARD in this document.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 470, Packet Page 473 Air Quality
Air Quality Emissions Study 11
through March, and limits the content of total distillate in slow cure asphalt and petroleum solvents in emulsified asphalt.
ƒ Rule 426 (Architectural Coatings). This rule limits the emissions of ROGs from the use of architectural coatings and sets VOC content limits for a variety of coating categories, including flat, nonflat, nonflat – high gloss, and specialty coatings. Specifically, Rule 426 limits the VOC content of flat coatings to 50 grams per liter and nonflat coatings to 100 grams per liter. Persons are prohibited from manufacturing, blending, repackaging for use, supplying, selling, soliciting, or applying architectural coatings that exceed these limits. ƒ Rule 439 (Building Removals). This rule limits particulate emissions from the removal of buildings by prohibiting all visible emissions from building removal. To achieve compliance with this standard, Rule 439 requires work practice standards, including wetting the structure prior to removal, demolishing the structure inward toward the building pad, and prohibiting the commencement of removal activities when peak wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. ƒ Rule 1000 (Permit Guidelines and Requirements for Sources Emitting Toxic Air Contaminants):

This rule regulates TACs from new or modified stationary sources that have the potential to emit carcinogenic or noncarcinogenic TACs. Rule 1000 requires sources of carcinogenic TACs to install best control technology and reduce cancer risk to less than one incident per 100,000 persons. Sources of noncarcinogenic TACs must apply reasonable control technology (MBARD 2008).

MBARD also promulgates rules applicable to numerous other activities.3 City of Monterey
The City of Monterey General Plan Conservation Element (2016) contains the following goal and policies that would be applicable to the proposed project:

Goal c Reduce fixed source and transportation-based air pollution.

Policy c.1 Reduce air pollution generated by motor vehicles by encouraging the use of public transit, carpooling, bicycles, and walking as alternatives.

Policies to achieve these goals are found in the Circulation Element.

Promote cooperation with local and state agencies to develop programs to reduce sources of air pollution.

Policy c.3 Promote cooperation with local and state agencies to develop programs to reduce sources of air pollution.

2.1.4 Current Air Quality
As the local air quality management agency, MBARD is required to monitor air pollutant levels to ensure that state and federal air quality standards are met and, if they are not met, to develop strategies to meet the standards. Table 4 summarizes the representative annual air quality data from the nearest CARB and USEPA monitoring stations between 2017 and 2019 for all criteria pollutants. As shown in Table 4, no state or federal standards were exceeded at these monitoring stations in the past three years except for the federal PM2.5 standard, which was exceeded one day in 2017 and four days in 2018. Three of the four exceedances in 2018 that occurred on November 3 MBARD Rules available online at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/DRDB/MBU/

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 471, Packet Page 474 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
12 10, 11, and 17 are likely the result of wildfire smoke from the Camp Fire, which burned over 153,000 acres in Butte County between November 8 and November 25, 2018.

Table 4 Ambient Air Quality Data (2017-2019)
Pollutant Standard 2017 2018 2019
Ozone (ppm), Worst 1-Hour1 0.073 0.062 0.071
Number of days above state standard 0.09 ppm 0 0 0
Ozone (ppm), 8-Hour Average1 0.066 0.054 0.064
Number of days above state or federal standard 0.070 ppm 0 0 0 Carbon Monoxide (ppm), Highest 8-Hour Average2 0.9 1.2 5.3 Number of days of above state or federal standard 9.0 ppm 0 0 0 Nitrogen Dioxide (ppm), Worst Hour2 0.034 0.047 0.030
Number of days above state standard 0.18 ppm 0 0 0
Number of days above federal standard 0.10 ppm 0 0 0
Sulfur Dioxide (ppm), Worst Hour3 0.0036 0.0069 0.00145 Number of days above state standard 0.25 ppm 0 0 0
Number of days above federal standard 0.075 ppm 0 0 0
Particulate Matter <10 microns (Pg/m3),
Worst 24 Hours4

95.3 78.9 89.0
Number of days above state standard 50 Pg/m3 * * *
Number of days above federal standard 150 Pg/m3 0 0 0
Particulate Matter <2.5 microns (Pg/m3),
Worst 24 Hours1

43.6 50.7 11.1
Number of days above federal standard 35 Pg/m3 1 4 0
Lead (Pg/m3), 3-Month Average5 0.07 0.08 0.07
Number of days above federal standard 0.15 Pg/m3 0 0 0
1 Data sourced from CARB and USEPA at the nearest monitoring station located at 35 Ford Road (Tularcitos Elementary School) in Carmel Valley.
2 Data sourced from USEPA at the nearest monitoring station located at 867 East Laurel Drive in Salinas. 3 Data sourced from USEPA at the nearest monitoring station located at 158b Jackson Street in San Jose. No monitoring stations within the NCCAB report ambient SO2 concentrations.
4 Data sourced from CARB and USEPA at the nearest monitoring station located at 415 Pearl Street in King City. 5 Data sourced from USEPA at the nearest monitoring station located at 2500 Cunningham Avenue in San Jose. No monitoring stations within the NCCAB report ambient lead concentrations.
ppm = parts per million; μg/m3
= micrograms per cubic meter; CARB = California Air Resources Board; USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency; NCCAB = North Central Coast Air Basin; SO2 = sulfur dioxide * Insufficient data was available to determine the value.

Sources: CARB 2020; USEPA 2020b
Ambient air monitoring for CO has not occurred in the NCCAB since 2012 due to low background concentrations. The most recently reported maximum eight-hour average CO concentration, reported at the Salinas #3 monitoring station, was 1.39 ppm in 2012, which is well below the state standard of 9.0 ppm. Similarly, ambient air monitoring for SO2 has not occurred in the NCCAB since 2009 due to low background concentrations. The most recently reported maximum 24-hour average

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 472, Packet Page 475 Air Quality
Air Quality Emissions Study 13
SO2 concentration, reported at the former Davenport monitoring station (located approximately 30 miles northwest of the project area in Santa Cruz County) was 0.004 ppm in 2009, which is well below the state 24-hour average SO2 standard of 0.04 ppm (CARB 2020).

Sensitive Receptors
Ambient air quality standards have been established to represent the levels of air quality considered sufficient, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect public health and welfare. They are designed to protect people most susceptible to respiratory distress, such as children under 14; persons over 65; persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise; and people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. The majority of sensitive receptor locations are therefore residences, schools, and hospitals. The sensitive receptors nearest to the project site are apartment buildings adjacent to the northeast of the project site as well as apartment buildings 75 feet to the west.

2.2 Impact Analysis

2.2.1 Methodology
The project’s construction and operational emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), version 2016.3.2. CalEEMod uses project-specific information, including the project’s land uses, square footages for different uses, and location, to estimate a project’s construction and operational emissions.

Construction emissions modeled include emissions generated by construction equipment used on the site and emissions generated by vehicle trips associated with construction, such as worker and vendor trips. The construction schedule was based on applicant-provided data, while the construction equipment list was generated by CalEEMod using default values. In addition, according to applicant-provided data, approximately 1,010 cubic yards of soil would be exported from the project site. It was assumed that project construction would comply with all applicable regulatory standards, including MBARD Rule 426 (Architectural Coatings). Project construction is expected to commence in January 2022 with full buildout completed by May 2023. CalEEMod defaults for acreages graded were used to provide estimates of emissions from site preparation and grading activities.

Operational emissions modeled include mobile source emissions (i.e., vehicle emissions), energy emissions, and area source emissions. Energy usage from non-residential energy usage was reduced by 30 percent to account for the requirements of 2019 Title 24 standards (California Energy Commission 2018). In addition, CalEEMod does not incorporate water use reductions achieved by 2016 CALGreen (Part 11 of Title 24). New development would be subject to CALGreen, which ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĂϮϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶŝŶĚŽŽƌǁĂƚĞƌƵƐĞĞĸĐŝĞŶĐLJ͘dŚƵƐ͕ŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽĂĐĐŽƵŶƚĨŽƌ compliance with CALGreen, a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use was included in the water consumption calculations for new development. Mobile source emissions consist of emissions generated by vehicle trips to and from the project site. CalEEMod defaults for trip generation rates for the various land uses were used. Emissions attributed to energy use include emissions from natural gas consumption for space and water heating. Area source emissions are generated by landscape maintenance equipment, consumer products, and architectural coatings.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 473, Packet Page 476 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
14 2.2.2 Significance Thresholds
To determine whether a project would result in a significant impact to air quality, Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines requires consideration of whether a project would:

1. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan;

2. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard;

3. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or

4. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

The CEQA Guidelines (Section 15064.7) provide that, when available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make determinations of significance. MBARD has adopted guidelines for quantifying and determining the significance of air pollutant emissions in its CEQA Air Quality Guidelines (MBARD 2008). Emissions generated by the proposed project were compared to MBARD’s thresholds for both construction and operational emissions.

The proposed project would be inconsistent with the MBARD AQMP, and would therefore have a cumulatively considerable (significant) contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts, if it would result in either of the following (MBARD 2008, Duymich 2018):
ƒ Population growth generated by the proposed project would cause the cumulative population of Monterey County (i.e., existing population plus population accommodated by the proposed project and locally approved and unconstructed projects) to exceed the population forecast for the appropriate five-year increment utilized in the 2015 AQMP; or4 ƒ Construction and operational emissions of ozone precursors would exceed the significance thresholds established by MBARD, which are intended to set the allowable limit that a project can emit without impeding or conflicting with the AQMP’s goal of attainment ambient air quality standards.

In addition, the proposed project’s impacts on criteria air pollution would be significant if the proposed project would result in air pollutant emissions during construction or operation that exceeds the thresholds in Table 5.
4 In Monterey County, consistency with population forecasts is based on comparing a project’s population with countywide forecasts to avoid confusion related to declining population forecasts for cities on the Monterey Peninsula (MBARD 2008).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 474, Packet Page 477 Air Quality
Air Quality Emissions Study 15
Table 5 Air Quality Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant Source Threshold of Significance
Construction Impacts
PM10 Direct 82 lbs/day1
Operational Impacts
VOC Direct and Indirect 137 lbs/day
NOX Direct and Indirect 137 lbs/day
PM10 On-site 82 lbs/day2
CO LOS at intersection/road segment degrades from D or better to E or F or V/C ratio at intersection/road segment at LOS E or F increases by 0.05 or more or delay at intersection at LOS E or F increases by 10 seconds or more or reserve capacity at unsignalized intersection at LOS E or F decreases by 50 or more
Direct 550 lbs/day
SOX, as SO2 Direct 150 lbs/day
Notes: PM10 = particulate matter with a diameter of 10 micrometers or less; lbs/day = pounds per day; VOC = volatile organic compounds; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; LOS = level of service; V/C = volume-to-capacity; SOX = oxides of sulfur; SO2 = sulfur dioxide;
1 This threshold only applies if construction is located nearby or upwind of sensitive receptors. In addition, a significant air quality impact related to PM10 emissions may occur if a project uses equipment that is not “typical construction equipment” as specified in Section 5.3 of the MBARD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines.
2 MBARD’s operational PM10 threshold of significance applies only to on-site emissions, such as project-related exceedances along unpaved roads. These impacts are generally less than significant. For large development projects, almost all travel is on paved roads, and entrained road dust from vehicular travel can exceed the significance threshold.

Source: MBARD 2008
The CO thresholds provided by MBARD are designed to screen out from further analysis projects that would have a less than significant impact to CO; however, projects that exceed these thresholds would not necessarily result in a hotspot. Localized CO concentrations are primarily the result of the volume of cars along a road and the level of emissions generated by vehicles; restricted vehicular traffic flows can contribute to higher volumes of vehicles on a given roadway in a period of time, but are not the cause of high CO concentrations. Stringent vehicle emission standards in California have reduced the level of CO emissions generated by vehicles over time such that CO hotspots are rarely a concern, except for roadways with very high traffic volumes. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) has established a volume of 44,000 vehicles per hour as the level above which traffic volumes may contribute to a violation of CO standards (BAAQMD 2017). The NCCAB and the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB, the jurisdiction of the BAAQMD), which is the air basin immediately adjacent to the NCCAB to the north, are both in attainment for the CAAQS and NAAQS for CO and have not reported exceedances of the CO standard at local monitoring stations for the last two decades (BAAQMD 2017). Therefore, given the similar ambient air quality conditions for CO in both air basins, it is appropriate to use the BAAQMD threshold in this analysis.

The BAAQMD threshold is applied in the following impact analysis if the proposed project exceeds the MBARD screening thresholds presented above to determine whether the proposed project would result in an exceedance of CO standards.

In addition to criteria pollutants, MBARD regulates TACs from new or modified sources under Rule 1000. Rule 1000 applies to any source that requires a permit to construct or operate pursuant to District Regulation II (Permits) and has the potential to emit carcinogenic or noncarcinogenic TACs.

MBARD also implements Rule 1003, which establishes and implements the Air Toxics Hot Spots Act,

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 475, Packet Page 478 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
16 and Rule 424, which applies to demolition and/or renovation activities that are subject to the asbestos NESHAP in Rule 306. The project would be required to comply with Rules 1000, 1003, and 424.

According to MBARD guidelines, a project would have a significant impact if TAC emissions result in an exceedance of health risk public notification thresholds adopted by MBARD. The guidelines also set forth the following thresholds, which are the same as the public notification thresholds:
ƒ The hazard index is greater than one for acute or chronic impacts; or ƒ The cancer risk is greater than 10 in one million.

For odor emissions, the MBARD guidelines state that impacts would be significant if the project would result in the emission of substantial concentrations of pollutants that produce objectionable odors, causing injury, nuisance, or annoyance to a considerable number of persons, or endangering the comfort, health, or safety of the public. If construction or operation of the project would emit pollutants associated with odors in substantial amounts, the analysis should assess the impact on existing or reasonably foreseeable sensitive receptors.

2.2.3 Impact Analysis
Threshold 1: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
Impact AQ-1 THE PROJECT WOULD NOT CONFLICT WITH OR OBSTRUCT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2015 MBARD AQMP. NO IMPACT WOULD OCCUR.

The most recent air quality plan adopted by MBARD is the 2015 AQMP. The 2015 AQMP only addresses attainment of the State eight-hour ozone standard because in 2012 the USEPA designated the NCCAB as attainment for the then-current federal eight-hour ozone standard of 0.075 ppm. In October 2015, the federal eight-hour ozone standard was reduced to 0.070 ppm; however, the NCCAB continues to be in attainment with the federal eight-hour ozone standard (MBARD 2017).

A significant impact to air quality would occur if buildout of the proposed project would conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 2015 AQMP. Although any development project would represent an incremental negative impact on air quality in the NCCAB due to increased air pollutant emissions, the primary concern is whether project-related impacts have been properly anticipated in the regional air quality planning process and reduced whenever feasible. MBARD uses growth forecasts provided by the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) to project populationrelated emissions, which are used in developing the AQMP for the NCCAB.

The current population of the City of Monterey is estimated at 28,004 (MBARD 2017). The proposed project would not directly induce additional population growth because it does not include construction of residential units. The project would require approximately five new employees.

Given the nature of these employment opportunities, it is likely that these employees would be drawn from the existing workforce in the City of Monterey. However, for the purpose of this analysis, it is conservatively assumed that these approximately five new employees would relocate from outside the area for the positions, and thus would be new residents of the City of Monterey.

The population growth projections used in the 2015 AQMP forecast that the population of the City of Monterey will reach approximately 28,839 residents by 2025 (MBARD 2017). Therefore, the current population of the City of Monterey plus the project’s indirect population growth does not

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 476, Packet Page 479 Air Quality
Air Quality Emissions Study 17
exceed the population forecast utilized in the 2015 AQMP for year 2025 and is therefore within the applicable assumptions of the air pollutant emissions forecast contained in the AQMP. Furthermore, as discussed under Impact AQ-2 below, operational emissions generated by the proposed project would not exceed MBARD thresholds for ozone precursor emissions. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the 2015 AQMP. No impact would occur.

Threshold 2 Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Impact AQ-2 CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD NOT RESULT IN A

CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE NET INCREASE OF ANY CRITERIA POLLUTANT FOR WHICH THE MBARD REGION IS IN NONATTAINMENT UNDER APPLICABLE FEDERAL OR STATE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARD.THEREFORE, IMPACTS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION WOULD BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT.

As discussed in Section 2.1.3, Air Quality Regulations, the NCCAB is currently designated nonattainment-transitional for the State ozone standards and nonattainment for the State PM10 standard, but is in attainment for all other Federal and State standards. Therefore, this analysis focuses on air quality impacts related to those criteria pollutants for which the NCCAB is in nonattainment, which are ozone and PM10.

Construction Emissions
Project construction would involve demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities that have the potential to generate air pollutant emissions. Table 6 summarizes the estimated maximum daily criteria pollutant emissions during project construction. As shown in Table 6, project construction emissions would be below the MBARD construction thresholds of significance and therefore impacts would be less than significant.

Table 6 Project Construction Emissions
Maximum Daily Emissions (pounds per day)
VOC NOX CO PM10
(exhaust)
PM2.5
(exhaust)
SOX
Maximum Daily
Emissions
3 15 17 1 1 <1
MBARD Thresholds N/A N/A N/A 82 N/A N/A
Threshold
Exceeded?1
N/A N/A N/A No N/A N/A
VOC = volatile organic compounds; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SOX = oxides of sulfur; PM10 = particulate matter with a diameter of 10 micrometers or less; PM2.5 = particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less; N/A = not applicable Notes: All numbers have been rounded up to the nearest whole number. 1 MBARD has not adopted a threshold for evaluating construction VOC, NOX, CO, PM2.5, or SOX emissions.

Source: Table 2.1 “Overall Construction-mitigated” emissions. Winter emissions results are shown for all emissions. See CalEEMod worksheets in Appendix A.

As shown in Table 6, construction of the project would generate maximum daily emissions of approximately 1 pound of PM10 per day, which would not exceed the MBARD threshold of 82 pounds per day. Furthermore, as discussed above, MBARD guidelines state that ozone precursor

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 477, Packet Page 480 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
18 emissions from construction projects using typical equipment were accounted for in the emission inventories of the 2015 AQMP. The proposed project would use typical construction equipment; thus, ozone precursor emissions from project construction were accounted for the emission inventories and would not have a significant impact on the attainment and maintenance of state or federal ozone AAQS (MBARD 2008). Therefore, project construction would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under the applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and impacts would be less than significant. Required compliance with MBARD Rule 400 (Visible Emissions) and Rule 425 (Use of Cutback Asphalt) would further reduce emissions of dust particulates during project construction.

Operational Emissions
The project would result in long-term air pollutant emissions over the course of operation.

Emissions include area sources, energy sources, and mobile emissions. Area sources include use of consumer products, use of gas-powered landscaping equipment, and re-application of architectural coating (re-painting). Energy sources include natural gas for uses such heating/air conditioning, appliances, lighting, and water heating. Mobile emissions include vehicle trips by residents, employees, and visitors. If a project’s operational emissions do not exceed MBARD thresholds, the proposed project impacts to regional air quality are considered individually less than significant and less than cumulatively considerable.

Table 7 summarizes the total estimated emissions associated with operation of the proposed project by emission source. As shown therein, emissions of VOC, NOX, CO, SO2 and PM10 emissions would not exceed MBARD thresholds. Therefore, project operation would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under the applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard, and impacts would be less than significant.

Table 7 Estimated Maximum Operational Emissions
Emissions (pounds per day)
Source VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Area Emissions 1 <1 <1 0 <1 <1
Energy Emissions <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Mobile Emissions 1 3 6 <1 1 <1
Project Emissions 2 3 6 <1 1 <1
MBARD Threshold 137 137 550 150 82 N/A
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No N/A1
N/A = not applicable
Notes: All source emissions have been rounded to the nearest tenth and all project emissions have been rounded up to the nearest whole number, to be conservative. Numbers may not add up due to rounding. 1 MBARD does not have a significance threshold for operational PM2.5 emissions.

Source: Source: Table 2.2 “Overall Construction-mitigated” emissions. Winter emissions results are shown for all emissions. See CalEEMod worksheets in Appendix A.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 478, Packet Page 481 Air Quality
Air Quality Emissions Study 19
Human Health
Although construction and operational emissions of ROG, NOX, and PM10 would be less than significant, the proposed project would incrementally increase emissions of these pollutants, which would incrementally increase ozone and PM10 concentrations in Monterey County and incrementally contribute to Monterey County’s existing nonattainment status for the state ozone and PM10 standards. These long-term impacts are not considered significant under the applicable MBARD thresholds. For informational purposes, the analysis below describes how the project’s incremental (and less than significant) impacts relate to human health.

It is not necessarily the tonnage of pollutants emitted that causes human health effects; rather, it is the concentrations of ozone and PM that cause these effects. The incremental increase in ozone and PM10 concentrations in Monterey County as a result of proposed project would contribute to adverse health impacts that are already occurring due to the region’s nonattainment status for these pollutants. As discussed above under Section 2.1.2, Air Pollutants of Primary Concern, the health impacts of ozone include respiratory and eye irritation and possible changes in lung functions, and the health impacts of PM10 include respiratory irritation, reduced lung function, aggravation of cardiovascular disease, and cancer. However, because emissions of ozone precursors and PM10 would not exceed MBARD thresholds, the project’s incremental contribution to these adverse health impacts would be less than significant and less than cumulatively considerable.

Threshold 3 Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Impact AQ-3 THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD NOT EXPOSE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS TO SUBSTANTIAL CONCENTRATIONS OF CO OR TACS.THEREFORE, IMPACTS WOULD BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT.

As discussed above, the sensitive receptors nearest to the project site are apartment buildings adjacent to the northeast of the project site as well as apartment buildings 75 feet to the west.

Carbon Monoxide Hotspots
Buildout of the proposed project would result in new development or redevelopment that would generate additional vehicle trips on area roadways. Areas with high vehicle density, such as congested intersections, have the potential to create concentrations of CO (“CO hotspots”) and could potentially expose sensitive receptors to harmful levels of pollution. The NAAQS for CO is 35.0 ppm and the CAAQS for CO is 20.0 ppm (CARB 2016).

As discussed above in Section 2.2.2, Significance Thresholds, localized CO concentrations are the result of the volume of cars along a road and the level of emissions generated by vehicles, rather than the flow of traffic, and vehicle CO emissions have declined over time due to stringent State standards for vehicle emissions and would continue to decline as more stringent standards are put in place. MBARD provides screening thresholds for CO hotspot impacts but does not have a standard for assessing whether a project’s CO hotspot impacts would be significant. Therefore, the CO threshold from BAAQMD, which is the air district immediately adjacent to MBARD to the north, is utilized in this analysis. BAAQMD recommends comparing project’s attributes with the following screening criteria as a first step to evaluating whether the project would result in the generation of CO concentrations that would substantially contribute to an exceedance of the Thresholds of Significance. The project would result in a less than significant impact to localized CO concentrations if:

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 479, Packet Page 482 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
20 The project is consistent with an applicable congestion management program for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans
The project would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour
Project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at the affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnel, parking garage).

The project would include 42 hotel rooms. Based on CalEEMod trip generation estimates for the land use type of “Hotel,” there would be approximately 343 vehicle trips to the site per weekday, 344 vehicle trips to the site per Saturday, and 250 vehicle trips to the site per Sunday. The Transportation Agency of Monterey County (TAMC) monitors regional traffic counts on North Fremont Street. The most recent traffic counts were taken in 2019 at North Fremont Street between Palo Verde Avenue and Dela Rosa Avenue, which is approximately 560 feet west of the proposed project, estimated a peak average daily traffic of 19,085 and off-peak average daily traffic 18,858 (TAMC 2020). As a result, the proposed project would result in a 2% increase in average daily traffic, or 19,428 average daily traffic, during the weekday peak hour. Considering the small size of the surrounding roadways in the project vicinity, this increase in project trip generation would not exceed the screening thresholds listed above. Therefore, the impact of localized CO emissions would be less than significant.

Toxic Air Contaminants
Construction Impacts
Typical sources of acutely and chronically hazardous TACs identified by CARB include distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, chrome plating facilities, dry cleaners, and gasoline dispensing facilities (CARB 2005). MBARD also identifies additional common sources of TACs including dieselfueled internal combustion engines and parking areas for diesel-fueled heavy-duty trucks and buses (MBARD 2008).

Generation of DPM from construction projects typically occurs in a single area for a short period.

Construction of the proposed project would occur over approximately 17 months. The dose to which the receptors are exposed is the primary factor used to determine health risk. Dose is a function of the concentration of a substance or substances in the environment and the extent of exposure that person has with the substance. Dose is positively correlated with time, meaning that a longer exposure period would result in a higher exposure level for the Maximally Exposed Individual. The risks estimated for a Maximally Exposed Individual are higher if a fixed exposure occurs over a longer period of time. According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, health risk assessments, which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic emissions, should be based on a 70-year exposure period; however, such assessments should be limited to the period/duration of activities associated with the project. Thus, the duration of proposed construction activities (i.e., 17 months) is approximately 2 percent of the total exposure period used for health risk calculation. Current models and methodologies for conducting healthrisk assessments are associated with longer-term exposure periods of 9, 30, and 70 years, which do not correlate well with the temporary and highly variable nature of construction activities, resulting in difficulties in producing accurate estimates of health risk (BAAQMD 2017). Therefore, this analysis qualitatively discusses potential health risks associated with construction-related emissions of TACs,

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 480, Packet Page 483 Air Quality
Air Quality Emissions Study 21
focusing on construction activities most likely to generate substantial TAC emissions and the duration of such activities relative to established, longer-term health risk exposure periods.

The maximum PM10 and PM2.5 emissions would occur during site preparation and grading activities.

These activities would last for approximately five months. PM emissions would decrease for the remaining construction period because construction activities such as building construction and architectural coating would require less construction equipment. While the maximum DPM emissions associated with site preparation and grading activities would only occur for a portion of the overall construction period, these activities represent the maximum exposure condition for the total construction period. The duration of site preparation and grading activities would represent less than one percent of the total exposure period for a 70-year health risk calculation.5 Therefore, DPM generated by project construction would not create conditions where the probability is greater than 10 in one million of contracting cancer for the Maximally Exposed Individual or to generate ground-level concentrations of non-carcinogenic TACs that exceed a Hazard Index greater than one for the Maximally Exposed Individual. This impact would be less than significant.

Operational Impacts
The project would not include sources of substantial TAC emissions. It is expected that quantities of hazardous TACs generated on-site (e.g., cleaning solvents, paints, landscape pesticides, etc.) for the types of proposed land uses would be below thresholds warranting further study under the California Accidental Release Program, which regulates stationary sources of hazardous substances used annually in quantities ranging from 500 to 20,000 pounds. Further, the proposed hotel project is not defined by CARB as a sensitive land use, which includes residences, schools and school yards, parks and playgrounds, daycare centers, nursing homes, and medical facilities (BAAQMD 2017).

Because the project would not contain substantial TAC sources and is consistent with the CARB and MBARD guidelines, the project would not result in the exposure of sensitive receptors to significant amounts of carcinogenic or toxic air contaminants. Therefore, impacts related to TACs would be less than significant.

Threshold 4 Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Impact AQ-4 THE PROJECT WOULD NOT GENERATE ODORS ADVERSELY AFFECTING A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE DURING CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION.IMPACTS WOULD BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT.

During construction activities, temporary odors from vehicle exhaust and construction equipment engines would occur. Construction-related odors would be short-term and would cease upon completion. Land uses typically producing objectionable odors include landfills, rendering plants, chemical plants, agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, and refineries (MBARD 2008). As a result, hotel uses are not typically associated with substantial numbers of odor complaints according to MBARD’s guidance. In addition, MBARD Rule 402 prohibits the discharge of air contaminants or other materials which would cause a nuisance or detriment to a considerable number of persons or to the public, with the exception of odors from agricultural activities. Therefore, given the nature of land uses under the proposed project and required compliance with MBARD Rule 402, the proposed project would not create objectionable odors that would adversely affect a substantial number of people during construction and operation, and impacts would be less than significant. 5 (5 months / [12 months x 70 years]) x 100 = 0.60 percent

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 481, Packet Page 484 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
22 3 References
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2017. California Environmental Quality Act:

Air Quality Guidelines. San Francisco, CA. May 2017.
http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-andresearch/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en. (accessed September 2020).

California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April 2005. https://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf (accessed September 2020).
______. 2009. Definitions of VOC and ROG. January. Available at:
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/ei/speciate/voc_rog_dfn_1_09.pdf ______. 2011. Staff Report: Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Rulemaking, Public Hearing to Consider the “LEV III” Amendments to the California Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Pollutant Exhaust and Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures and to the On-Board Diagnostic System Requirements for Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles, and to the Evaporative Emission Requirements for Heavy-Duty Vehicles.

Sacramento, CA. December 7, 2011.
https://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2012/leviiighg2012/levisor.pdf. (accessed September 2020). ______. 2016. Ambient Air Quality Standards. Last modified: May 4, 2016. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf (accessed September 2020). ______. 2020a. “Ozone & Health.” https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/ozone-and-health (accessed September 2020).
______. 2020b. Top 4 Summary: Select Pollutant, Years, & Area. https://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfour1.php (accessed September 2020).

California Energy Commission. 2018. “2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards.” March 2018.

Duymich, Chris. 2018. Air Quality Planner II, Monterey Bay Air Resources District. Personal communication via phone regarding consistency with the air quality management plan with Annaliese Miller, Associate Environmental Planner, Rincon Consultants, Inc. August 2, 2018.

Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD), formerly Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District. 2008. CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. February 2008. http://mbuapcd.org/pdf/CEQA_full%20(1).pdf (accessed September 2020). ______. 2017. 2012 – 2015 Air Quality Management Plan. Monterey, CA. March 15, 2017.

Transportation Agency of Monterey County. 2020. “Traffic Counts.” https://www.tamcmonterey.org/traffic-counts (accessed October 2020).

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2016a. “Basic Information about Carbon Monoxide (CO) Outdoor Air Pollution.” [web page] Last modified September 8, 2016. https://www.epa.gov/co-pollution/basic-information-about-carbon-monoxide-co-outdoorair-pollution#Effects (accessed September 2020).

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 482, Packet Page 485 References
Air Quality Emissions Study 23
______. 2016b. “Basic Information about NO2.” Last modified: September 8, 2016. https://www.epa.gov/no2-pollution/basic-information-about-no2 (accessed September 2020).
______. 2018. “Health and Environmental Effects of Particulate Matter (PM).” Last modified: June 20, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-effectsparticulate-matter-pm (accessed September 2020). ______. 2019. “Sulfur Dioxide Basics.” Last modified April 2, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/so2- pollution/sulfur-dioxide-basics (accessed September 2020). ______. 2020. Integrated Science Assessment for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants.

EPA/600/R-20/012. Washington, DC. April 2020.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 483, Packet Page 486 Arris Studio Architects
2101 N. Fremont Street Hotel Project
24 This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 484, Packet Page 487 Appendix $
ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ
ŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ
ƐƚŝŵĂƚŽƌDŽĚĞůKƵƚƉƵƚ

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 485, Packet Page 488

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 142.00 Space 0.36 15,550.00 0
Hotel 42.00 Room 0.16 25,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban4
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.8 53

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2024 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
298.49 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.003 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Avid Hotel Project
Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 1 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 486, Packet Page 489 Project Characteristics - Adjusted for 2030 RPS
Land Use - per project plansConstruction Phase - Per information provided by clientDemolition - Grading - 1,010 cubic yard exportedArchitectural Coating - MBARD rule 426Area Coating - MBARD Rule 426 Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Adjusted by 20% for Cal GreenConstruction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Energy Mitigation - Reduced by 30% for 2019 title 24 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 2 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 487, Packet Page 490 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 150.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 150.00 100.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 150 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 150 100
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 152.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 283.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 86.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 22.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 31.00tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/22/2022 5/31/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/8/2022 5/31/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/19/2022 5/31/2022 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/15/2022 1/31/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/17/2022 2/28/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/16/2022 11/1/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/20/2022 5/1/2022 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/18/2022 2/1/2022
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/9/2022 1/1/2023
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 1,010.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 56,800.00 15,550.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 60,984.00 25,000.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.28 0.36tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.40 0.16 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 641.35 298.49 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,065,404.34 852,323.47
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 3 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 488, Packet Page 491

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1526 1.1540 1.1671 2.1900e003 0.0671 0.0549 0.1220 0.0253 0.0513 0.0766 0.0000 193.6896 193.6896 0.0438 0.0000 194.78562023 0.1417 0.5147 0.6007 1.1000e003 0.0127 0.0242 0.0368 3.4200e- 003 0.0226 0.0260 0.0000 96.7001 96.7001 0.0220 0.0000 97.2508 Maximum 0.1526 1.1540 1.1671 2.1900e003 0.0671 0.0549 0.1220 0.0253 0.0513 0.0766 0.0000 193.6896 193.6896 0.0438 0.0000 194.7856 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1526 1.1540 1.1671 2.1900e003 0.0671 0.0549 0.1220 0.0253 0.0513 0.0766 0.0000 193.6894 193.6894 0.0438 0.0000 194.78542023 0.1417 0.5147 0.6007 1.1000e003 0.0127 0.0242 0.0368 3.4200e- 003 0.0226 0.0260 0.0000 96.7000 96.7000 0.0220 0.0000 97.2507 Maximum 0.1526 1.1540 1.1671 2.1900e003 0.0671 0.0549 0.1220 0.0253 0.0513 0.0766 0.0000 193.6894 193.6894 0.0438 0.0000 194.7854 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 4 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 489, Packet Page 492

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.1108 2.0000e005 2.3400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5700e- 003 4.5700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.8600e- 003 Energy 5.9700e003 0.0543 0.0456 3.3000e- 004 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 0.0000 85.6430 85.6430 3.7100e- 003 1.3500e- 003 86.1381 Mobile 0.0950 0.4733 0.9665 3.0600e003 0.2356 2.5400e- 003 0.2381 0.0632 2.3700e- 003 0.0656 0.0000 281.8111 281.8111 0.0142 0.0000 282.1659 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.6688 0.0000 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2704 0.6805 0.9509 0.0278 6.6000e004 1.8444 Total 0.2118 0.5276 1.0144 3.3900e003 0.2356 6.6800e- 003 0.2422 0.0632 6.5100e- 003 0.0698 4.9392 368.1391 373.0783 0.3217 2.0100e- 003 381.7200 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-3-2022 4-2-2022 0.3212 0.32122 4-3-2022 7-2-2022 0.3525 0.35253 7-3-2022 10-2-2022 0.2824 0.28244 10-3-2022 1-2-2023 0.3590 0.3590 5 1-3-2023 4-2-2023 0.4151 0.41516 4-3-2023 7-2-2023 0.2290 0.2290 Highest 0.4151 0.4151
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 5 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 490, Packet Page 493

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.1108 2.0000e005 2.3400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5700e- 003 4.5700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.8600e- 003 Energy 4.3700e003 0.0398 0.0334 2.4000e- 004 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 0.0000 67.7283 67.7283 3.2000e- 003 1.0400e- 003 68.1181 Mobile 0.0950 0.4733 0.9665 3.0600e003 0.2356 2.5400e- 003 0.2381 0.0632 2.3700e- 003 0.0656 0.0000 281.8111 281.8111 0.0142 0.0000 282.1659 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.6688 0.0000 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2704 0.6805 0.9509 0.0278 6.6000e004 1.8444 Total 0.2102 0.5131 1.0022 3.3000e003 0.2356 5.5700e- 003 0.2411 0.0632 5.4000e- 003 0.0687 4.9392 350.2244 355.1636 0.3212 1.7000e- 003 363.6999 Mitigated Operational3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.76 2.76 1.20 2.65 0.00 16.62 0.46 0.00 17.05 1.59 0.00 4.87 4.80 0.16 15.42 4.72 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 6 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 491, Packet Page 494 Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/3/2022 1/14/2022 5 102 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/15/2022 2/28/2022 5 313 Grading Grading 2/1/2022 5/31/2022 5 864 Building Construction Building Construction 5/1/2022 5/31/2023 5 283 5 Paving Paving 1/1/2023 1/31/2023 5 226 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/1/2022 5/31/2023 5 152 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 37,500; Non-Residential Outdoor: 12,500; Striped Parking OffRoad Equipment
Area: 933
(Architectural Coating – sqft)Acres of Gradin
g (Site Preparation Phase): 15.5
Acres of Gradin
g (Gradin
g Phase): 0
Acres of Pavin
g: 0.36
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 7 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 492, Packet Page 495 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 38.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 126.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 5 17.00 7.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 3.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 8 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 493, Packet Page 496

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 4.2000e003 0.0000 4.2000e- 003 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.5500e003 0.0321 0.0374 6.0000e- 005 1.6900e- 003 1.6900e- 003 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 5.2068 5.2068 9.6000e- 004 0.0000 5.2308 Total 3.5500e003 0.0321 0.0374 6.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 003 1.6900e- 003 5.8900e- 003 6.4000e- 004 1.6100e- 003 2.2500e- 003 0.0000 5.2068 5.2068 9.6000e- 004 0.0000 5.2308

3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUnmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 9 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 494, Packet Page 497

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.4000e004 4.6600e- 003 8.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 3.4000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.4347 1.4347 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4362 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.9000e004 1.6000e- 004 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3452 0.3452 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3455 Total 3.3000e004 4.8200e- 003 2.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.4000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.7799 1.7799 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.7817 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 4.2000e003 0.0000 4.2000e- 003 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.5500e003 0.0321 0.0374 6.0000e- 005 1.6900e- 003 1.6900e- 003 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 5.2068 5.2068 9.6000e- 004 0.0000 5.2308 Total 3.5500e003 0.0321 0.0374 6.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 003 1.6900e- 003 5.8900e- 003 6.4000e- 004 1.6100e- 003 2.2500e- 003 0.0000 5.2068 5.2068 9.6000e- 004 0.0000 5.2308 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 10 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 495, Packet Page 498

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.4000e004 4.6600e- 003 8.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 3.4000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.4347 1.4347 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4362 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.9000e004 1.6000e- 004 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3452 0.3452 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3455 Total 3.3000e004 4.8200e- 003 2.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.4000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.7799 1.7799 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.7817 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 8.2200e003 0.0000 8.2200e- 003 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.9900e003 0.1075 0.0614 1.5000e- 004 3.9900e- 003 3.9900e- 003 3.6700e- 003 3.6700e- 003 0.0000 13.2531 13.2531 4.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.3602 Total 8.9900e003 0.1075 0.0614 1.5000e- 004 8.2200e- 003 3.9900e- 003 0.0122 8.9000e- 004 3.6700e- 003 4.5600e- 003 0.0000 13.2531 13.2531 4.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.3602 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 11 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 496, Packet Page 499

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e004 2.5000e- 004 2.2900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.2000e- 004 0.0000 6.2000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.5350 0.5350 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5355 Total 2.9000e004 2.5000e- 004 2.2900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.2000e- 004 0.0000 6.2000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.5350 0.5350 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5355 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 8.2200e003 0.0000 8.2200e- 003 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.9900e003 0.1075 0.0614 1.5000e- 004 3.9900e- 003 3.9900e- 003 3.6700e- 003 3.6700e- 003 0.0000 13.2531 13.2531 4.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.3602 Total 8.9900e003 0.1075 0.0614 1.5000e- 004 8.2200e- 003 3.9900e- 003 0.0122 8.9000e- 004 3.6700e- 003 4.5600e- 003 0.0000 13.2531 13.2531 4.2900e- 003 0.0000 13.3602 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 12 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 497, Packet Page 500

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e004 2.5000e- 004 2.2900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.2000e- 004 0.0000 6.2000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.5350 0.5350 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5355 Total 2.9000e004 2.5000e- 004 2.2900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.2000e- 004 0.0000 6.2000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.5350 0.5350 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5355 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0325 0.0000 0.0325 0.0178 0.0000 0.0178 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0305 0.2758 0.3212 5.2000e004 0.0145 0.0145 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 44.7785 44.7785 8.2700e- 003 0.0000 44.9851 Total 0.0305 0.2758 0.3212 5.2000e004 0.0325 0.0145 0.0470 0.0178 0.0139 0.0317 0.0000 44.7785 44.7785 8.2700e- 003 0.0000 44.9851 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 13 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 498, Packet Page 501

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 4.6000e004 0.0155 2.9400e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.1200e- 003 2.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.7573 4.7573 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 4.7621 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e003 1.3600e- 003 0.0127 3.0000e- 005 3.4200e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.4500e- 003 9.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.9686 2.9686 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.9713 Total 2.0600e003 0.0168 0.0156 8.0000e- 005 4.4900e- 003 8.0000e- 005 4.5700e- 003 1.2000e- 003 8.0000e- 005 1.2800e- 003 0.0000 7.7259 7.7259 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 7.7333 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0325 0.0000 0.0325 0.0178 0.0000 0.0178 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0305 0.2758 0.3212 5.2000e004 0.0145 0.0145 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 44.7784 44.7784 8.2700e- 003 0.0000 44.9851 Total 0.0305 0.2758 0.3212 5.2000e004 0.0325 0.0145 0.0470 0.0178 0.0139 0.0317 0.0000 44.7784 44.7784 8.2700e- 003 0.0000 44.9851 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 14 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 499, Packet Page 502

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 4.6000e004 0.0155 2.9400e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.1200e- 003 2.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.7573 4.7573 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 4.7621 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e003 1.3600e- 003 0.0127 3.0000e- 005 3.4200e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.4500e- 003 9.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.9686 2.9686 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.9713 Total 2.0600e003 0.0168 0.0156 8.0000e- 005 4.4900e- 003 8.0000e- 005 4.5700e- 003 1.2000e- 003 8.0000e- 005 1.2800e- 003 0.0000 7.7259 7.7259 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 7.7333 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0601 0.6148 0.6259 1.0000e003 0.0325 0.0325 0.0299 0.0299 0.0000 87.6292 87.6292 0.0283 0.0000 88.3378 Total 0.0601 0.6148 0.6259 1.0000e003 0.0325 0.0325 0.0299 0.0299 0.0000 87.6292 87.6292 0.0283 0.0000 88.3378 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 15 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 500, Packet Page 503

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0800e003 0.0661 0.0154 1.7000e- 004 4.0400e- 003 1.8000e- 004 4.2200e- 003 1.1700e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.3400e- 003 0.0000 16.4390 16.4390 8.5000e- 004 0.0000 16.4603 Worker 5.5500e003 4.7200e- 003 0.0439 1.1000e- 004 0.0118 1.0000e- 004 0.0119 3.1500e- 003 9.0000e- 005 3.2300e- 003 0.0000 10.2694 10.2694 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 10.2785 Total 7.6300e003 0.0708 0.0592 2.8000e- 004 0.0159 2.8000e- 004 0.0162 4.3200e- 003 2.7000e- 004 4.5700e- 003 0.0000 26.7084 26.7084 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 26.7388 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0601 0.6148 0.6259 1.0000e003 0.0325 0.0325 0.0299 0.0299 0.0000 87.6291 87.6291 0.0283 0.0000 88.3377 Total 0.0601 0.6148 0.6259 1.0000e003 0.0325 0.0325 0.0299 0.0299 0.0000 87.6291 87.6291 0.0283 0.0000 88.3377 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 16 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 501, Packet Page 504

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0800e003 0.0661 0.0154 1.7000e- 004 4.0400e- 003 1.8000e- 004 4.2200e- 003 1.1700e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.3400e- 003 0.0000 16.4390 16.4390 8.5000e- 004 0.0000 16.4603 Worker 5.5500e003 4.7200e- 003 0.0439 1.1000e- 004 0.0118 1.0000e- 004 0.0119 3.1500e- 003 9.0000e- 005 3.2300e- 003 0.0000 10.2694 10.2694 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 10.2785 Total 7.6300e003 0.0708 0.0592 2.8000e- 004 0.0159 2.8000e- 004 0.0162 4.3200e- 003 2.7000e- 004 4.5700e- 003 0.0000 26.7084 26.7084 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 26.7388 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0341 0.3466 0.3832 6.2000e004 0.0173 0.0173 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 54.1126 54.1126 0.0175 0.0000 54.5501 Total 0.0341 0.3466 0.3832 6.2000e004 0.0173 0.0173 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 54.1126 54.1126 0.0175 0.0000 54.5501 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 17 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 502, Packet Page 505

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.6000e004 0.0335 8.0900e- 003 1.0000e- 004 2.4900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.5400e- 003 7.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 0.0000 9.9653 9.9653 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 9.9755 Worker 3.1800e003 2.6100e- 003 0.0247 7.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 7.3600e- 003 1.9400e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.9900e- 003 0.0000 6.1025 6.1025 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.1075 Total 4.1400e003 0.0362 0.0328 1.7000e- 004 9.7900e- 003 1.1000e- 004 9.9000e- 003 2.6600e- 003 1.0000e- 004 2.7600e- 003 0.0000 16.0677 16.0677 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 16.0830 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0341 0.3466 0.3832 6.2000e004 0.0173 0.0173 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 54.1125 54.1125 0.0175 0.0000 54.5500 Total 0.0341 0.3466 0.3832 6.2000e004 0.0173 0.0173 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 54.1125 54.1125 0.0175 0.0000 54.5500 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 18 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 503, Packet Page 506

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.6000e004 0.0335 8.0900e- 003 1.0000e- 004 2.4900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.5400e- 003 7.2000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 0.0000 9.9653 9.9653 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 9.9755 Worker 3.1800e003 2.6100e- 003 0.0247 7.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 7.3600e- 003 1.9400e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.9900e- 003 0.0000 6.1025 6.1025 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.1075 Total 4.1400e003 0.0362 0.0328 1.7000e- 004 9.7900e- 003 1.1000e- 004 9.9000e- 003 2.6600e- 003 1.0000e- 004 2.7600e- 003 0.0000 16.0677 16.0677 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 16.0830 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7200e003 0.0606 0.0772 1.2000e- 004 2.9100e- 003 2.9100e- 003 2.7100e- 003 2.7100e- 003 0.0000 10.3392 10.3392 3.0100e- 003 0.0000 10.4145 Paving 4.7000e004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.1900e003 0.0606 0.0772 1.2000e- 004 2.9100e- 003 2.9100e- 003 2.7100e- 003 2.7100e- 003 0.0000 10.3392 10.3392 3.0100e- 003 0.0000 10.4145 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 19 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 504, Packet Page 507

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.9000e004 5.6000e- 004 5.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5900e- 003 4.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3162 1.3162 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3173 Total 6.9000e004 5.6000e- 004 5.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5900e- 003 4.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3162 1.3162 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3173 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7200e003 0.0606 0.0772 1.2000e- 004 2.9100e- 003 2.9100e- 003 2.7100e- 003 2.7100e- 003 0.0000 10.3391 10.3391 3.0100e- 003 0.0000 10.4144 Paving 4.7000e004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.1900e003 0.0606 0.0772 1.2000e- 004 2.9100e- 003 2.9100e- 003 2.7100e- 003 2.7100e- 003 0.0000 10.3391 10.3391 3.0100e- 003 0.0000 10.4144 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 20 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 505, Packet Page 508

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.9000e004 5.6000e- 004 5.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5900e- 003 4.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3162 1.3162 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3173 Total 6.9000e004 5.6000e- 004 5.3200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5900e- 003 4.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3162 1.3162 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3173 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0345 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.5000e003 0.0310 0.0399 7.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 5.6172 5.6172 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.6263 Total 0.0390 0.0310 0.0399 7.0000e005 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 5.6172 5.6172 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.6263 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 21 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 506, Packet Page 509

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.5000e004 2.1000e- 004 1.9500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.3000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4557 0.4557 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4561 Total 2.5000e004 2.1000e- 004 1.9500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.3000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4557 0.4557 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4561 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0345 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.5000e003 0.0310 0.0399 7.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 5.6172 5.6172 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.6263 Total 0.0390 0.0310 0.0399 7.0000e005 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 5.6172 5.6172 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.6263 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 22 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 507, Packet Page 510

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.5000e004 2.1000e- 004 1.9500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.3000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4557 0.4557 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4561 Total 2.5000e004 2.1000e- 004 1.9500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.3000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4557 0.4557 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4561 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0846 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0104 0.0704 0.0978 1.6000e004 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 0.0000 13.7876 13.7876 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 13.8082 Total 0.0950 0.0704 0.0978 1.6000e004 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 0.0000 13.7876 13.7876 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 13.8082 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 23 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 508, Packet Page 511

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e004 4.6000e- 004 4.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 003 3.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.0769 1.0769 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0778 Total 5.6000e004 4.6000e- 004 4.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 003 3.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.0769 1.0769 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0778 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0846 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0104 0.0704 0.0978 1.6000e004 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 0.0000 13.7876 13.7876 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 13.8082 Total 0.0950 0.0704 0.0978 1.6000e004 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 3.8200e- 003 0.0000 13.7876 13.7876 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 13.8082 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 24 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 509, Packet Page 512

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e004 4.6000e- 004 4.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 003 3.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.0769 1.0769 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0778 Total 5.6000e004 4.6000e- 004 4.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 003 3.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.0769 1.0769 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0778 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 25 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 510, Packet Page 513 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0950 0.4733 0.9665 3.0600e003 0.2356 2.5400e- 003 0.2381 0.0632 2.3700e- 003 0.0656 0.0000 281.8111 281.8111 0.0142 0.0000 282.1659 Unmitigated 0.0950 0.4733 0.9665 3.0600e003 0.2356 2.5400e- 003 0.2381 0.0632 2.3700e- 003 0.0656 0.0000 281.8111 281.8111 0.0142 0.0000 282.1659

4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 343.14 343.98 249.90 626,863 626,863
Total 343.14 343.98 249.90 626,863 626,863
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.552293 0.026858 0.203057 0.118966 0.019018 0.004857 0.019364 0.041479 0.003068 0.002366 0.006793 0.001094 0.000786 Hotel 0.552293 0.026858 0.203057 0.118966 0.019018 0.004857 0.019364 0.041479 0.003068 0.002366 0.006793 0.001094 0.000786 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 26 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 511, Packet Page 514

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 24.4475 24.4475 2.3800e003 2.5000e- 004 24.5801 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 26.5292 26.5292 2.5800e003 2.7000e- 004 26.6731 NaturalGas
Mitigated

4.3700e003 0.0398 0.0334 2.4000e- 004 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 0.0000 43.2807 43.2807 8.3000e- 004 7.9000e- 004 43.5379 NaturalGasUnmitigated

5.9700e003 0.0543 0.0456 3.3000e- 004 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 0.0000 59.1138 59.1138 1.1300e- 003 1.0800e- 003 59.4650 Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures EnergyExceed Title 24
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 27 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 512, Packet Page 515

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Hotel 1.10775e
+006

5.9700e003 0.0543 0.0456 3.3000e- 004 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 0.0000 59.1138 59.1138 1.1300e- 003 1.0800e- 003 59.4650 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.9700e003 0.0543 0.0456 3.3000e- 004 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 4.1300e- 003 0.0000 59.1138 59.1138 1.1300e- 003 1.0800e- 003 59.4650 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Hotel 811050 4.3700e003 0.0398 0.0334 2.4000e- 004 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 0.0000 43.2807 43.2807 8.3000e- 004 7.9000e- 004 43.5379 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.3700e003 0.0398 0.0334 2.4000e- 004 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 3.0200e- 003 0.0000 43.2807 43.2807 8.3000e- 004 7.9000e- 004 43.5379 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 28 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 513, Packet Page 516

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Hotel 190500 25.7923 2.5100e003 2.6000e- 004 25.9322
Parking Lot 5442.5 0.7369 7.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.7409 Total 26.5292 2.5800e003 2.7000e- 004 26.6731
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Hotel 175125 23.7107 2.3000e003 2.4000e- 004 23.8393
Parking Lot 5442.5 0.7369 7.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.7409 Total 24.4475 2.3700e003 2.5000e- 004 24.5801
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 29 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 514, Packet Page 517 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.1108 2.0000e005 2.3400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5700e- 003 4.5700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.8600e- 003 Unmitigated 0.1108 2.0000e005 2.3400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5700e- 003 4.5700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.8600e- 003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0119 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0986 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.2000e004 2.0000e- 005 2.3400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5700e- 003 4.5700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.8600e- 003 Total 0.1108 2.0000e005 2.3400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5700e- 003 4.5700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.8600e- 003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 30 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 515, Packet Page 518

6.2 Area by SubCategory

7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0119 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0986 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.2000e004 2.0000e- 005 2.3400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5700e- 003 4.5700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.8600e- 003 Total 0.1108 2.0000e005 2.3400e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.5700e- 003 4.5700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.8600e- 003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 31 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 516, Packet Page 519 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 0.9509 0.0278 6.6000e004 1.8444
Unmitigated 0.9509 0.0278 6.6000e004 1.8444

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Hotel 0.852323 /

0.118378

0.9509 0.0278 6.6000e004 1.8444
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.9509 0.0278 6.6000e004 1.8444
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 32 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 517, Packet Page 520

7.2 Water by Land Use

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Hotel 0.852323 /

0.118378

0.9509 0.0278 6.6000e004 1.8444
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.9509 0.0278 6.6000e004 1.8444
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Unmitigated 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 33 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 518, Packet Page 521

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Hotel 23 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Hotel 23 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 34 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 519, Packet Page 522

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:40 AM Page 35 of 35 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 520, Packet Page 523

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 142.00 Space 0.36 15,550.00 0
Hotel 42.00 Room 0.16 25,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban4
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.8 53

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2024 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
298.49 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.003 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Avid Hotel Project
Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 1 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 521, Packet Page 524 Project Characteristics - Adjusted for 2030 RPS
Land Use - per project plansConstruction Phase - Per information provided by clientDemolition - Grading - 1,010 cubic yard exportedArchitectural Coating - MBARD rule 426Area Coating - MBARD Rule 426 Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Adjusted by 20% for Cal GreenConstruction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Energy Mitigation - Reduced by 30% for 2019 title 24 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 2 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 522, Packet Page 525 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 150.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 150.00 100.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 150 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 150 100
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 152.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 283.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 86.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 22.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 31.00tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/22/2022 5/31/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/8/2022 5/31/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/19/2022 5/31/2022 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/15/2022 1/31/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/17/2022 2/28/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/16/2022 11/1/2022tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/20/2022 5/1/2022 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/18/2022 2/1/2022
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/9/2022 1/1/2023
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 1,010.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 56,800.00 15,550.00tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 60,984.00 25,000.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.28 0.36tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.40 0.16 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 641.35 298.49 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,065,404.34 852,323.47
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 3 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 523, Packet Page 526

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 2.5650 14.6448 15.7133 0.0285 1.4337 0.7146 2.0307 0.5110 0.6696 1.1631 0.0000 2,779.976 1 2,779.976
1 0.5929 0.0000 2,794.797
4 2023 3.2091 13.9631 17.1509 0.0303 0.3596 0.6586 1.0182 0.0964 0.6151 0.7115 0.0000 2,898.908 8 2,898.908
8 0.6939 0.0000 2,916.256
8 Maximum 3.2091 14.6448 17.1509 0.0303 1.4337 0.7146 2.0307 0.5110 0.6696 1.1631 0.0000 2,898.908 8 2,898.908
8 0.6939 0.0000 2,916.256
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 2.5650 14.6448 15.7133 0.0285 1.4337 0.7146 2.0307 0.5110 0.6696 1.1631 0.0000 2,779.976 1 2,779.976
1 0.5929 0.0000 2,794.797
4 2023 3.2091 13.9631 17.1509 0.0303 0.3596 0.6586 1.0182 0.0964 0.6151 0.7115 0.0000 2,898.908 8 2,898.908
8 0.6939 0.0000 2,916.256
8 Maximum 3.2091 14.6448 17.1509 0.0303 1.4337 0.7146 2.0307 0.5110 0.6696 1.1631 0.0000 2,898.908 8 2,898.908
8 0.6939 0.0000 2,916.256
8 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 4 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 524, Packet Page 527 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 5 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 525, Packet Page 528

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.6075 1.7000e004 0.0188 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0403 0.0403 1.1000e- 004 0.0429 Energy 0.0327 0.2975 0.2499 1.7900e003 0.0226 0.0226 0.0226 0.0226 357.0508 357.0508 6.8400e- 003 6.5500e- 003 359.1725 Mobile 0.5422 2.7497 5.9087 0.0174 1.3924 0.0147 1.4070 0.3729 0.0137 0.3865 1,761.214 7 1,761.214
7 0.0930 1,763.538
5 Total 1.1824 3.0474 6.1774 0.0192 1.3924 0.0373 1.4297 0.3729 0.0364 0.4092 2,118.305 7 2,118.305
7 0.0999 6.5500e003 2,122.753
9 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.6075 1.7000e004 0.0188 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0403 0.0403 1.1000e- 004 0.0429 Energy 0.0240 0.2179 0.1830 1.3100e003 0.0166 0.0166 0.0166 0.0166 261.4182 261.4182 5.0100e- 003 4.7900e- 003 262.9717 Mobile 0.5422 2.7497 5.9087 0.0174 1.3924 0.0147 1.4070 0.3729 0.0137 0.3865 1,761.214 7 1,761.214
7 0.0930 1,763.538
5 Total 1.1737 2.9677 6.1105 0.0187 1.3924 0.0313 1.4237 0.3729 0.0303 0.4032 2,022.673 2 2,022.673
2 0.0981 4.7900e003 2,026.553
1 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 6 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 526, Packet Page 529

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/3/2022 1/14/2022 5 102 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/15/2022 2/28/2022 5 313 Grading Grading 2/1/2022 5/31/2022 5 864 Building Construction Building Construction 5/1/2022 5/31/2023 5 283 5 Paving Paving 1/1/2023 1/31/2023 5 226 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/1/2022 5/31/2023 5 152 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.74 2.61 1.08 2.51 0.00 16.21 0.42 0.00 16.64 1.48 0.00 4.51 4.51 1.83 26.87 4.53 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 37,500; Non-Residential Outdoor: 12,500; Striped Parking Area: 933 (Architectural Coatin g – sqft)
Acres of Gradin
g (Site Preparation Phase): 15.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0Acres of Paving: 0.36 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 7 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 527, Packet Page 530 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 38.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 126.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 5 17.00 7.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 3.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 8 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 528, Packet Page 531

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.8391 0.0000 0.8391 0.1271 0.0000 0.1271 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.3375 0.3375 0.3225 0.3225 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Total 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.8391 0.3375 1.1766 0.1271 0.3225 0.4496 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionUnmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 9 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 529, Packet Page 532

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0282 0.9324 0.1882 2.9600e003 0.0664 3.3100e- 003 0.0697 0.0182 3.1600e- 003 0.0214 312.2314 312.2314 0.0134 312.5667 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0411 0.0349 0.3065 7.6000e004 0.0822 6.4000e- 004 0.0828 0.0218 5.9000e- 004 0.0224 75.7446 75.7446 2.7200e- 003 75.8126 Total 0.0692 0.9672 0.4947 3.7200e003 0.1486 3.9500e- 003 0.1525 0.0400 3.7500e- 003 0.0438 387.9760 387.9760 0.0161 388.3794 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.8391 0.0000 0.8391 0.1271 0.0000 0.1271 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.3375 0.3375 0.3225 0.3225 0.0000 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Total 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.8391 0.3375 1.1766 0.1271 0.3225 0.4496 0.0000 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 10 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 530, Packet Page 533

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0282 0.9324 0.1882 2.9600e003 0.0664 3.3100e- 003 0.0697 0.0182 3.1600e- 003 0.0214 312.2314 312.2314 0.0134 312.5667 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0411 0.0349 0.3065 7.6000e004 0.0822 6.4000e- 004 0.0828 0.0218 5.9000e- 004 0.0224 75.7446 75.7446 2.7200e- 003 75.8126 Total 0.0692 0.9672 0.4947 3.7200e003 0.1486 3.9500e- 003 0.1525 0.0400 3.7500e- 003 0.0438 387.9760 387.9760 0.0161 388.3794 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e003 0.2573 0.2573 0.2367 0.2367 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Total 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e003 0.5303 0.2573 0.7876 0.0573 0.2367 0.2940 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 11 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 531, Packet Page 534

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0205 0.0174 0.1533 3.8000e004 0.0411 3.2000e- 004 0.0414 0.0109 2.9000e- 004 0.0112 37.8723 37.8723 1.3600e- 003 37.9063 Total 0.0205 0.0174 0.1533 3.8000e004 0.0411 3.2000e- 004 0.0414 0.0109 2.9000e- 004 0.0112 37.8723 37.8723 1.3600e- 003 37.9063 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e003 0.2573 0.2573 0.2367 0.2367 0.0000 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Total 0.5797 6.9332 3.9597 9.7300e003 0.5303 0.2573 0.7876 0.0573 0.2367 0.2940 0.0000 942.5179 942.5179 0.3048 950.1386 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 12 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 532, Packet Page 535

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0205 0.0174 0.1533 3.8000e004 0.0411 3.2000e- 004 0.0414 0.0109 2.9000e- 004 0.0112 37.8723 37.8723 1.3600e- 003 37.9063 Total 0.0205 0.0174 0.1533 3.8000e004 0.0411 3.2000e- 004 0.0414 0.0109 2.9000e- 004 0.0112 37.8723 37.8723 1.3600e- 003 37.9063 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.7546 0.0000 0.7546 0.4141 0.0000 0.4141 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.3375 0.3375 0.3225 0.3225 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Total 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.7546 0.3375 1.0921 0.4141 0.3225 0.7366 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 13 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 533, Packet Page 536

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0109 0.3595 0.0725 1.1400e003 0.0256 1.2700e- 003 0.0269 7.0200e- 003 1.2200e- 003 8.2400e- 003 120.3830 120.3830 5.1700e- 003 120.5123 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0411 0.0349 0.3065 7.6000e004 0.0822 6.4000e- 004 0.0828 0.0218 5.9000e- 004 0.0224 75.7446 75.7446 2.7200e- 003 75.8126 Total 0.0519 0.3943 0.3791 1.9000e003 0.1078 1.9100e- 003 0.1097 0.0288 1.8100e- 003 0.0306 196.1276 196.1276 7.8900e- 003 196.3249 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.7546 0.0000 0.7546 0.4141 0.0000 0.4141 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.3375 0.3375 0.3225 0.3225 0.0000 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Total 0.7094 6.4138 7.4693 0.0120 0.7546 0.3375 1.0921 0.4141 0.3225 0.7366 0.0000 1,147.902 5 1,147.902
5 0.2119 1,153.200
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 14 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 534, Packet Page 537

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0109 0.3595 0.0725 1.1400e003 0.0256 1.2700e- 003 0.0269 7.0200e- 003 1.2200e- 003 8.2400e- 003 120.3830 120.3830 5.1700e- 003 120.5123 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0411 0.0349 0.3065 7.6000e004 0.0822 6.4000e- 004 0.0828 0.0218 5.9000e- 004 0.0224 75.7446 75.7446 2.7200e- 003 75.8126 Total 0.0519 0.3943 0.3791 1.9000e003 0.1078 1.9100e- 003 0.1097 0.0288 1.8100e- 003 0.0306 196.1276 196.1276 7.8900e- 003 196.3249 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Total 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 15 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 535, Packet Page 538

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0247 0.7516 0.1911 1.9400e003 0.0474 2.1700e- 003 0.0496 0.0136 2.0800e- 003 0.0157 203.2408 203.2408 0.0114 203.5257 Worker 0.0698 0.0592 0.5211 1.2900e003 0.1397 1.0900e- 003 0.1407 0.0370 1.0000e- 003 0.0380 128.7659 128.7659 4.6200e- 003 128.8815 Total 0.0945 0.8108 0.7122 3.2300e003 0.1871 3.2600e- 003 0.1903 0.0507 3.0800e- 003 0.0538 332.0067 332.0067 0.0160 332.4072 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 0.0000 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Total 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 0.0000 1,103.939 3 1,103.939
3 0.3570 1,112.865
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 16 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 536, Packet Page 539

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0247 0.7516 0.1911 1.9400e003 0.0474 2.1700e- 003 0.0496 0.0136 2.0800e- 003 0.0157 203.2408 203.2408 0.0114 203.5257 Worker 0.0698 0.0592 0.5211 1.2900e003 0.1397 1.0900e- 003 0.1407 0.0370 1.0000e- 003 0.0380 128.7659 128.7659 4.6200e- 003 128.8815 Total 0.0945 0.8108 0.7122 3.2300e003 0.1871 3.2600e- 003 0.1903 0.0507 3.0800e- 003 0.0538 332.0067 332.0067 0.0160 332.4072 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6322 6.4186 7.0970 0.0114 0.3203 0.3203 0.2946 0.2946 1,104.608 9 1,104.608
9 0.3573 1,113.540
2 Total 0.6322 6.4186 7.0970 0.0114 0.3203 0.3203 0.2946 0.2946 1,104.608 9 1,104.608
9 0.3573 1,113.540
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 17 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 537, Packet Page 540

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0186 0.6183 0.1618 1.9000e003 0.0474 9.2000e- 004 0.0483 0.0136 8.8000e- 004 0.0145 199.6189 199.6189 8.8100e- 003 199.8392 Worker 0.0650 0.0531 0.4742 1.2500e003 0.1397 1.0500e- 003 0.1407 0.0370 9.7000e- 004 0.0380 123.9861 123.9861 4.1200e- 003 124.0890 Total 0.0836 0.6714 0.6360 3.1500e003 0.1871 1.9700e- 003 0.1890 0.0507 1.8500e- 003 0.0525 323.6049 323.6049 0.0129 323.9282 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6322 6.4186 7.0970 0.0114 0.3203 0.3203 0.2946 0.2946 0.0000 1,104.608 9 1,104.608
9 0.3573 1,113.540
2 Total 0.6322 6.4186 7.0970 0.0114 0.3203 0.3203 0.2946 0.2946 0.0000 1,104.608 9 1,104.608
9 0.3573 1,113.540
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 18 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 538, Packet Page 541

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0186 0.6183 0.1618 1.9000e003 0.0474 9.2000e- 004 0.0483 0.0136 8.8000e- 004 0.0145 199.6189 199.6189 8.8100e- 003 199.8392 Worker 0.0650 0.0531 0.4742 1.2500e003 0.1397 1.0500e- 003 0.1407 0.0370 9.7000e- 004 0.0380 123.9861 123.9861 4.1200e- 003 124.0890 Total 0.0836 0.6714 0.6360 3.1500e003 0.1871 1.9700e- 003 0.1890 0.0507 1.8500e- 003 0.0525 323.6049 323.6049 0.0129 323.9282 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6112 5.5046 7.0209 0.0113 0.2643 0.2643 0.2466 0.2466 1,036.087 8 1,036.087
8 0.3018 1,043.633
1 Paving 0.0429 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6540 5.5046 7.0209 0.0113 0.2643 0.2643 0.2466 0.2466 1,036.087 8 1,036.087
8 0.3018 1,043.633
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 19 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 539, Packet Page 542

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0688 0.0562 0.5021 1.3200e003 0.1479 1.1200e- 003 0.1490 0.0392 1.0300e- 003 0.0403 131.2794 131.2794 4.3600e- 003 131.3883 Total 0.0688 0.0562 0.5021 1.3200e003 0.1479 1.1200e- 003 0.1490 0.0392 1.0300e- 003 0.0403 131.2794 131.2794 4.3600e- 003 131.3883 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6112 5.5046 7.0209 0.0113 0.2643 0.2643 0.2466 0.2466 0.0000 1,036.087 8 1,036.087
8 0.3018 1,043.633
1 Paving 0.0429 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6540 5.5046 7.0209 0.0113 0.2643 0.2643 0.2466 0.2466 0.0000 1,036.087 8 1,036.087
8 0.3018 1,043.633
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 20 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 540, Packet Page 543

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0688 0.0562 0.5021 1.3200e003 0.1479 1.1200e- 003 0.1490 0.0392 1.0300e- 003 0.0403 131.2794 131.2794 4.3600e- 003 131.3883 Total 0.0688 0.0562 0.5021 1.3200e003 0.1479 1.1200e- 003 0.1490 0.0392 1.0300e- 003 0.0403 131.2794 131.2794 4.3600e- 003 131.3883 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.5674 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.7719 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 21 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 541, Packet Page 544

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0123 0.0105 0.0920 2.3000e004 0.0246 1.9000e- 004 0.0248 6.5400e- 003 1.8000e- 004 6.7100e- 003 22.7234 22.7234 8.2000e- 004 22.7438 Total 0.0123 0.0105 0.0920 2.3000e004 0.0246 1.9000e- 004 0.0248 6.5400e- 003 1.8000e- 004 6.7100e- 003 22.7234 22.7234 8.2000e- 004 22.7438 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.5674 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.7719 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 22 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 542, Packet Page 545

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0123 0.0105 0.0920 2.3000e004 0.0246 1.9000e- 004 0.0248 6.5400e- 003 1.8000e- 004 6.7100e- 003 22.7234 22.7234 8.2000e- 004 22.7438 Total 0.0123 0.0105 0.0920 2.3000e004 0.0246 1.9000e- 004 0.0248 6.5400e- 003 1.8000e- 004 6.7100e- 003 22.7234 22.7234 8.2000e- 004 22.7438 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.5674 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 1.7590 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 23 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 543, Packet Page 546

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0115 9.3700e003 0.0837 2.2000e- 004 0.0246 1.9000e- 004 0.0248 6.5400e- 003 1.7000e- 004 6.7100e- 003 21.8799 21.8799 7.3000e- 004 21.8981 Total 0.0115 9.3700e003 0.0837 2.2000e- 004 0.0246 1.9000e- 004 0.0248 6.5400e- 003 1.7000e- 004 6.7100e- 003 21.8799 21.8799 7.3000e- 004 21.8981 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1.5674 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 1.7590 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 24 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 544, Packet Page 547

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0115 9.3700e003 0.0837 2.2000e- 004 0.0246 1.9000e- 004 0.0248 6.5400e- 003 1.7000e- 004 6.7100e- 003 21.8799 21.8799 7.3000e- 004 21.8981 Total 0.0115 9.3700e003 0.0837 2.2000e- 004 0.0246 1.9000e- 004 0.0248 6.5400e- 003 1.7000e- 004 6.7100e- 003 21.8799 21.8799 7.3000e- 004 21.8981 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 25 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 545, Packet Page 548 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.5422 2.7497 5.9087 0.0174 1.3924 0.0147 1.4070 0.3729 0.0137 0.3865 1,761.214 7 1,761.214
7 0.0930 1,763.538
5 Unmitigated 0.5422 2.7497 5.9087 0.0174 1.3924 0.0147 1.4070 0.3729 0.0137 0.3865 1,761.214 7 1,761.214
7 0.0930 1,763.538
5 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 343.14 343.98 249.90 626,863 626,863
Total 343.14 343.98 249.90 626,863 626,863
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.552293 0.026858 0.203057 0.118966 0.019018 0.004857 0.019364 0.041479 0.003068 0.002366 0.006793 0.001094 0.000786 Hotel 0.552293 0.026858 0.203057 0.118966 0.019018 0.004857 0.019364 0.041479 0.003068 0.002366 0.006793 0.001094 0.000786 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 26 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 546, Packet Page 549

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0240 0.2179 0.1830 1.3100e003 0.0166 0.0166 0.0166 0.0166 261.4182 261.4182 5.0100e- 003 4.7900e- 003 262.9717 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.0327 0.2975 0.2499 1.7900e003 0.0226 0.0226 0.0226 0.0226 357.0508 357.0508 6.8400e- 003 6.5500e- 003 359.1725 Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures EnergyExceed Title 24
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 27 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 547, Packet Page 550

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

6.0 Area Detail6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Hotel 3034.93 0.0327 0.2975 0.2499 1.7900e003 0.0226 0.0226 0.0226 0.0226 357.0508 357.0508 6.8400e- 003 6.5500e- 003 359.1725 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0327 0.2975 0.2499 1.7900e003 0.0226 0.0226 0.0226 0.0226 357.0508 357.0508 6.8400e- 003 6.5500e- 003 359.1725 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Hotel 2.22205 0.0240 0.2179 0.1830 1.3100e003 0.0166 0.0166 0.0166 0.0166 261.4182 261.4182 5.0100e- 003 4.7900e- 003 262.9717 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0240 0.2179 0.1830 1.3100e003 0.0166 0.0166 0.0166 0.0166 261.4182 261.4182 5.0100e- 003 4.7900e- 003 262.9717 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 28 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 548, Packet Page 551 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.6075 1.7000e004 0.0188 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0403 0.0403 1.1000e- 004 0.0429 Unmitigated 0.6075 1.7000e004 0.0188 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0403 0.0403 1.1000e- 004 0.0429

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0653 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.5405 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.7300e003 1.7000e- 004 0.0188 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0403 0.0403 1.1000e- 004 0.0429 Total 0.6075 1.7000e004 0.0188 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0403 0.0403 1.1000e- 004 0.0429 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 29 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 549, Packet Page 552

6.2 Area by SubCategory

7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures Water8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0653 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.5405 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.7300e003 1.7000e- 004 0.0188 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0403 0.0403 1.1000e- 004 0.0429 Total 0.6075 1.7000e004 0.0188 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0403 0.0403 1.1000e- 004 0.0429 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 30 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 550, Packet Page 553

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/2/2020 9:41 AM Page 31 of 31 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 551, Packet Page 554 Appendix E-2
ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ
ŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ
ƐƚŝŵĂƚŽƌDŽĚĞůUpdated Results

EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 552, Packet Page 555 Avid Hotel Project
Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Per information provided by clientOff-road Equipment - Applicant provided - used in Noise assessment. Activity 1 in Appendix D.Trips and VMT - Demolition - Grading - 1,349 cubic yard exported per project description Architectural Coating - MBARD rule 426Area Coating - MBARD Rule 4261.1 Land Usage Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Adjusted by 20% for Cal Green Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 42.00 Space 0.38 16,800.00 0
Hotel 42.00 Room 1.40 60,984.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban4
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.8 53

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2025 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 1 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 553, Packet Page 556 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation - Reduced by 30% for 2019 title 24Water Mitigation - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - from noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - from noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - from noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - noise assessment Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 165.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 75.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 15.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 90.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 75.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 90.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 1.88
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 81.00tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 402.00 247.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 132.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.73tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.40tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 2 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 554, Packet Page 557 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.31 0.31
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.42 0.36
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Concrete/Industrial Saws Excavators tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Rubber Tired Dozers Off-Highway TruckstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType ExcavatorstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Plate Compactors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType ExcavatorstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Plate Compactors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Aerial LiftstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PaverstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType RollerstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 3 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 555, Packet Page 558 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 3.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 7.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 169.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 13.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 4 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 556, Packet Page 559

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 13.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 13.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 5 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 557, Packet Page 560

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0317 0.2809 0.4169 7.1000e004 0.0177 0.0131 0.0308 4.0800e- 003 0.0121 0.0161 0.0000 63.5369 63.5369 0.0164 1.0200e- 003 64.2517 2024 0.0431 0.3375 0.3652 9.4000e004 0.0380 0.0140 0.0520 0.0102 0.0128 0.0230 0.0000 85.1550 85.1550 0.0159 2.4600e- 003 86.2855 2025 0.0158 0.1038 0.1848 4.6000e004 0.0260 3.4400e- 003 0.0295 7.0100e- 003 3.1700e- 003 0.0102 0.0000 42.2850 42.2850 4.9100e- 003 2.1600e- 003 43.0501 Maximum 0.0431 0.3375 0.4169 9.4000e004 0.0380 0.0140 0.0520 0.0102 0.0128 0.0230 0.0000 85.1550 85.1550 0.0164 2.4600e- 003 86.2855 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0317 0.2809 0.4169 7.1000e004 0.0177 0.0131 0.0308 4.0800e- 003 0.0121 0.0161 0.0000 63.5368 63.5368 0.0164 1.0200e- 003 64.2516 2024 0.0431 0.3375 0.3652 9.4000e004 0.0380 0.0140 0.0520 0.0102 0.0128 0.0230 0.0000 85.1550 85.1550 0.0159 2.4600e- 003 86.2855 2025 0.0158 0.1038 0.1848 4.6000e004 0.0260 3.4400e- 003 0.0295 7.0100e- 003 3.1700e- 003 0.0102 0.0000 42.2850 42.2850 4.9100e- 003 2.1600e- 003 43.0501 Maximum 0.0431 0.3375 0.4169 9.4000e004 0.0380 0.0140 0.0520 0.0102 0.0128 0.0230 0.0000 85.1550 85.1550 0.0164 2.4600e- 003 86.2855 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 6 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 558, Packet Page 561 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 3 7-1-2023 9-30-2023 0.1521 0.15214 10-1-2023 12-31-2023 0.1618 0.16185 1-1-2024 3-31-2024 0.1478 0.14786 4-1-2024 6-30-2024 0.1236 0.12367 7-1-2024 9-30-2024 0.0786 0.07868 10-1-2024 12-31-2024 0.0303 0.0303 9 1-1-2025 3-31-2025 0.0274 0.0274
10 4-1-2025 6-30-2025 0.0535 0.0535
11 7-1-2025 9-30-2025 0.0378 0.0378
Highest 0.1618 0.1618
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 7 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 559, Packet Page 562

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.2821 1.0000e005 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2200e- 003 Energy 0.0144 0.1313 0.1103 7.9000e004 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 0.0000 185.1963 185.1963 9.5800e- 003 3.4500e- 003 186.4637 Mobile 0.1538 0.1843 1.2813 2.3800e003 0.2372 2.1900e- 003 0.2394 0.0634 2.0500e- 003 0.0655 0.0000 225.1100 225.1100 0.0177 0.0122 229.1847 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.6688 0.0000 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3380 0.5717 0.9097 0.0348 8.3000e004 2.0276 Total 0.4503 0.3156 1.3926 3.1700e003 0.2372 0.0122 0.2494 0.0634 0.0120 0.0754 5.0068 410.8801 415.8869 0.3381 0.0165 429.2449 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 8 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 560, Packet Page 563

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.2821 1.0000e005 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2200e- 003 Energy 0.0106 0.0962 0.0808 5.8000e004 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 0.0000 143.8666 143.8666 8.3500e- 003 2.6900e- 003 144.8762 Mobile 0.1538 0.1843 1.2813 2.3800e003 0.2372 2.1900e- 003 0.2394 0.0634 2.0500e- 003 0.0655 0.0000 225.1100 225.1100 0.0177 0.0122 229.1847 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.6688 0.0000 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2704 0.4627 0.7331 0.0279 6.6000e004 1.6274 Total 0.4464 0.2805 1.3631 2.9600e003 0.2372 9.5000e- 003 0.2467 0.0634 9.3600e- 003 0.0728 4.9392 369.4414 374.3806 0.3299 0.0155 387.2573 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/1/2023 8/21/2023 5 15
2 Grading/Excavations Grading 8/22/2023 10/2/2023 5 303 Foundations (site & building) Building Construction 10/3/2023 2/5/2024 5 90 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.86 11.13 2.12 6.62 0.00 21.94 1.07 0.00 22.19 3.54 1.35 10.09 9.98 2.42 5.65 9.78 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 9 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 561, Packet Page 564 4 Structure Frame Building Construction 2/6/2024 5/20/2024 5 75 5 Building Exteriors Building Construction 5/21/2024 9/2/2024 5 756 Building Interiors Building Construction 9/3/2024 4/21/2025 5 1657 Site hard/soft scape Building Construction 4/22/2025 8/25/2025 5 90 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Building Exteriors Pumps 1 84 0.74
Building Exteriors Off-Highway Trucks 1 402 0.38Building Interiors Pumps 1 84 0.74 Building Interiors Off-Highway Trucks 1 402 0.38Site hard/soft scape Off-Highway Trucks 3 402 0.38 Site hard/soft scape Pavers 1 132 0.36Site hard/soft scape Rollers 1 80 0.38 Site hard/soft scape Pumps 1 84 0.74
Demolition Excavators 2 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Grading/Excavations Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41Grading/Excavations Rubber Tired Dozers 0 7.00 247 0.40Grading/Excavations Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Foundations (site & building) Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41
Foundations (site & building) Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Gradin
g (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Gradin
g (Gradin
g Phase): 1.88
Acres of Pavin
g: 0.38
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 10 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 562, Packet Page 565 Foundations (site & building) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Structure Frame Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Structure Frame Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Structure Frame Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74Structure Frame Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 6.00 97 0.37 Structure Frame Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Exteriors Cement and Mortar Mixers 0 6.00 9 0.56 Building Exteriors Pavers 0 6.00 130 0.42
Building Exteriors Paving Equipment 0 8.00 132 0.36
Building Exteriors Rollers 0 7.00 80 0.38
Building Exteriors Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Building Interiors
Air Compressors 0 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73Foundations (site & building) Cranes 0 6.00 231 0.29 Building Exteriors Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Interiors Cranes 0 6.00 231 0.29
Site hard/soft scape Cranes 0 6.00 231 0.29
Foundations (site & building) Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20
Building Exteriors Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20
Building Interiors Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Site hard/soft scape Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20
Foundations (site & building) Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74Building Exteriors Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74 Building Interiors Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74
Site hard/soft scape Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40Building Interiors Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 6.00 97 0.37 Site hard/soft scape Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Foundations (site & building) Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 11 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 563, Packet Page 566 Building Exteriors

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Interiors Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Site hard/soft scape Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Grading/Excavations Excavators 1 158 0.38Grading/Excavations Plate Compactors 1 8 0.43Grading/Excavations Off-Highway Trucks 2 402 0.38Foundations (site & building) Excavators 1 158 0.38Foundations (site & building) Off-Highway Trucks 3 402 0.38Foundations (site & building) Pumps 2 84 0.74Foundations (site & building) Plate Compactors 1 8 0.43Structure Frame Off-Highway Trucks 1 402 0.38Building Exteriors Aerial Lifts 1 63 0.31
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 38.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading/Excavations 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Foundations (site &
building)
10 33.00 0.00 169.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Structure Frame 3 33.00 13.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Exteriors 4 33.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Interiors 3 33.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site hard/soft scape 7 33.00 13.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 12 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 564, Packet Page 567

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 4.2000e003 0.0000 4.2000e- 003 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.4400e003 0.0678 0.0874 1.6000e- 004 3.1600e- 003 3.1600e- 003 2.9100e- 003 2.9100e- 003 0.0000 14.2472 14.2472 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 14.3624 Total 7.4400e003 0.0678 0.0874 1.6000e- 004 4.2000e- 003 3.1600e- 003 7.3600e- 003 6.4000e- 004 2.9100e- 003 3.5500e- 003 0.0000 14.2472 14.2472 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 14.3624 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 5.0000e005 2.7600e- 003 5.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1107 1.1107 1.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 1.1632 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.4000e004 1.9000e- 004 2.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.0000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.5018 0.5018 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.5069 Total 2.9000e004 2.9500e- 003 2.6700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.5000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.6125 1.6125 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 1.6701 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 13 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 565, Packet Page 568

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 4.2000e003 0.0000 4.2000e- 003 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.4400e003 0.0678 0.0874 1.6000e- 004 3.1600e- 003 3.1600e- 003 2.9100e- 003 2.9100e- 003 0.0000 14.2472 14.2472 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 14.3624 Total 7.4400e003 0.0678 0.0874 1.6000e- 004 4.2000e- 003 3.1600e- 003 7.3600e- 003 6.4000e- 004 2.9100e- 003 3.5500e- 003 0.0000 14.2472 14.2472 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 14.3624 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 5.0000e005 2.7600e- 003 5.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1107 1.1107 1.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 1.1632 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.4000e004 1.9000e- 004 2.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.0000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.5018 0.5018 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.5069 Total 2.9000e004 2.9500e- 003 2.6700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 9.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.5000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.6125 1.6125 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 1.6701 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 14 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 566, Packet Page 569

3.3 Grading/Excavations - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.0000e003 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.8100e003 0.0691 0.1004 1.4000e- 004 3.4100e- 003 3.4100e- 003 3.1400e- 003 3.1400e- 003 0.0000 12.3114 12.3114 3.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.4109 Total 6.8100e003 0.0691 0.1004 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 003 3.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 1.1000e- 004 3.1400e- 003 3.2500e- 003 0.0000 12.3114 12.3114 3.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.4109 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 8.8000e004 6.8000e- 004 7.5800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.1600e- 003 5.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8065 1.8065 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 1.8250 Total 8.8000e004 6.8000e- 004 7.5800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.1600e- 003 5.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8065 1.8065 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 1.8250 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 15 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 567, Packet Page 570

3.3 Grading/Excavations - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.0000e003 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.8100e003 0.0691 0.1004 1.4000e- 004 3.4100e- 003 3.4100e- 003 3.1400e- 003 3.1400e- 003 0.0000 12.3113 12.3113 3.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.4109 Total 6.8100e003 0.0691 0.1004 1.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 003 3.4100e- 003 4.4100e- 003 1.1000e- 004 3.1400e- 003 3.2500e- 003 0.0000 12.3113 12.3113 3.9800e- 003 0.0000 12.4109 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 8.8000e004 6.8000e- 004 7.5800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.1600e- 003 5.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8065 1.8065 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 1.8250 Total 8.8000e004 6.8000e- 004 7.5800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.1600e- 003 5.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8065 1.8065 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 1.8250 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 16 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 568, Packet Page 571

3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0127 0.1290 0.1874 2.6000e004 6.3700e- 003 6.3700e- 003 5.8600e- 003 5.8600e- 003 0.0000 22.9812 22.9812 7.4300e- 003 0.0000 23.1670 Total 0.0127 0.1290 0.1874 2.6000e004 6.3700e- 003 6.3700e- 003 5.8600e- 003 5.8600e- 003 0.0000 22.9812 22.9812 7.4300e- 003 0.0000 23.1670 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.5000e004 8.7400e- 003 1.8100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.0200e- 003 8.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.5127 3.5127 4.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 3.6786 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 3.4500e003 2.6400e- 003 0.0296 8.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.4600e- 003 2.2300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 7.0655 7.0655 2.5000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 7.1377 Total 3.6000e003 0.0114 0.0314 1.2000e- 004 9.4200e- 003 1.3000e- 004 9.5600e- 003 2.5100e- 003 1.2000e- 004 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 10.5781 10.5781 2.9000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 10.8163 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 17 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 569, Packet Page 572

3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0127 0.1290 0.1874 2.6000e004 6.3700e- 003 6.3700e- 003 5.8600e- 003 5.8600e- 003 0.0000 22.9812 22.9812 7.4300e- 003 0.0000 23.1670 Total 0.0127 0.1290 0.1874 2.6000e004 6.3700e- 003 6.3700e- 003 5.8600e- 003 5.8600e- 003 0.0000 22.9812 22.9812 7.4300e- 003 0.0000 23.1670 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.5000e004 8.7400e- 003 1.8100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.0200e- 003 8.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 2.8000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 3.5127 3.5127 4.0000e- 005 5.5000e- 004 3.6786 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 3.4500e003 2.6400e- 003 0.0296 8.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.4600e- 003 2.2300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 7.0655 7.0655 2.5000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 7.1377 Total 3.6000e003 0.0114 0.0314 1.2000e- 004 9.4200e- 003 1.3000e- 004 9.5600e- 003 2.5100e- 003 1.2000e- 004 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 10.5781 10.5781 2.9000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 10.8163 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 18 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 570, Packet Page 573

3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.9100e003 0.0494 0.0763 1.1000e- 004 2.2700e- 003 2.2700e- 003 2.0900e- 003 2.0900e- 003 0.0000 9.3420 9.3420 3.0200e- 003 0.0000 9.4175 Total 4.9100e003 0.0494 0.0763 1.1000e- 004 2.2700e- 003 2.2700e- 003 2.0900e- 003 2.0900e- 003 0.0000 9.3420 9.3420 3.0200e- 003 0.0000 9.4175 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 6.0000e005 3.5000e- 003 7.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4026 1.4026 2.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 1.4688 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.3100e003 9.5000e- 004 0.0111 3.0000e- 005 3.4100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.4300e- 003 9.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.8027 2.8027 9.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 2.8297 Total 1.3700e003 4.4500e- 003 0.0119 4.0000e- 005 3.8300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 3.8800e- 003 1.0200e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.2053 4.2053 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 4.2986 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 19 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 571, Packet Page 574

3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.9100e003 0.0494 0.0763 1.1000e- 004 2.2700e- 003 2.2700e- 003 2.0900e- 003 2.0900e- 003 0.0000 9.3420 9.3420 3.0200e- 003 0.0000 9.4175 Total 4.9100e003 0.0494 0.0763 1.1000e- 004 2.2700e- 003 2.2700e- 003 2.0900e- 003 2.0900e- 003 0.0000 9.3420 9.3420 3.0200e- 003 0.0000 9.4175 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 6.0000e005 3.5000e- 003 7.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4026 1.4026 2.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 1.4688 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.3100e003 9.5000e- 004 0.0111 3.0000e- 005 3.4100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.4300e- 003 9.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.8027 2.8027 9.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 2.8297 Total 1.3700e003 4.4500e- 003 0.0119 4.0000e- 005 3.8300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 3.8800e- 003 1.0200e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 4.2053 4.2053 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 4.2986 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 20 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 572, Packet Page 575

3.5 Structure Frame - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0120 0.1234 0.0820 2.1000e004 5.5400e- 003 5.5400e- 003 5.0900e- 003 5.0900e- 003 0.0000 18.0347 18.0347 5.8300e- 003 0.0000 18.1805 Total 0.0120 0.1234 0.0820 2.1000e004 5.5400e- 003 5.5400e- 003 5.0900e- 003 5.0900e- 003 0.0000 18.0347 18.0347 5.8300e- 003 0.0000 18.1805 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.6000e004 0.0245 7.5400e- 003 1.0000e- 004 3.2200e- 003 1.6000e- 004 3.3700e- 003 9.3000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.0800e- 003 0.0000 9.5447 9.5447 8.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 003 9.9647 Worker 3.7700e003 2.7500e- 003 0.0321 9.0000e- 005 9.8500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 9.9100e- 003 2.6200e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.6700e- 003 0.0000 8.0847 8.0847 2.6000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 8.1627 Total 4.4300e003 0.0273 0.0396 1.9000e- 004 0.0131 2.2000e- 004 0.0133 3.5500e- 003 2.1000e- 004 3.7500e- 003 0.0000 17.6294 17.6294 3.4000e- 004 1.6400e- 003 18.1274 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 21 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 573, Packet Page 576

3.5 Structure Frame - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0120 0.1234 0.0820 2.1000e004 5.5400e- 003 5.5400e- 003 5.0900e- 003 5.0900e- 003 0.0000 18.0347 18.0347 5.8300e- 003 0.0000 18.1805 Total 0.0120 0.1234 0.0820 2.1000e004 5.5400e- 003 5.5400e- 003 5.0900e- 003 5.0900e- 003 0.0000 18.0347 18.0347 5.8300e- 003 0.0000 18.1805 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.6000e004 0.0245 7.5400e- 003 1.0000e- 004 3.2200e- 003 1.6000e- 004 3.3700e- 003 9.3000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.0800e- 003 0.0000 9.5447 9.5447 8.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 003 9.9647 Worker 3.7700e003 2.7500e- 003 0.0321 9.0000e- 005 9.8500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 9.9100e- 003 2.6200e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.6700e- 003 0.0000 8.0847 8.0847 2.6000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 8.1627 Total 4.4300e003 0.0273 0.0396 1.9000e- 004 0.0131 2.2000e- 004 0.0133 3.5500e- 003 2.1000e- 004 3.7500e- 003 0.0000 17.6294 17.6294 3.4000e- 004 1.6400e- 003 18.1274 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 22 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 574, Packet Page 577

3.6 Building Exteriors - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.3300e003 0.0986 0.0499 1.6000e- 004 4.1000e- 003 4.1000e- 003 3.7700e- 003 3.7700e- 003 0.0000 14.2577 14.2577 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 14.3730 Total 9.3300e003 0.0986 0.0499 1.6000e- 004 4.1000e- 003 4.1000e- 003 3.7700e- 003 3.7700e- 003 0.0000 14.2577 14.2577 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 14.3730 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 3.7700e003 2.7500e- 003 0.0321 9.0000e- 005 9.8500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 9.9100e- 003 2.6200e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.6700e- 003 0.0000 8.0847 8.0847 2.6000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 8.1627 Total 3.7700e003 2.7500e- 003 0.0321 9.0000e- 005 9.8500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 9.9100e- 003 2.6200e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.6700e- 003 0.0000 8.0847 8.0847 2.6000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 8.1627 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 23 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 575, Packet Page 578

3.6 Building Exteriors - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.3300e003 0.0986 0.0499 1.6000e- 004 4.1000e- 003 4.1000e- 003 3.7700e- 003 3.7700e- 003 0.0000 14.2577 14.2577 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 14.3730 Total 9.3300e003 0.0986 0.0499 1.6000e- 004 4.1000e- 003 4.1000e- 003 3.7700e- 003 3.7700e- 003 0.0000 14.2577 14.2577 4.6100e- 003 0.0000 14.3730 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 3.7700e003 2.7500e- 003 0.0321 9.0000e- 005 9.8500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 9.9100e- 003 2.6200e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.6700e- 003 0.0000 8.0847 8.0847 2.6000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 8.1627 Total 3.7700e003 2.7500e- 003 0.0321 9.0000e- 005 9.8500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 9.9100e- 003 2.6200e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.6700e- 003 0.0000 8.0847 8.0847 2.6000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 8.1627 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 24 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 576, Packet Page 579

3.7 Building Interiors - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.0400e003 0.0285 0.0367 5.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.6500e- 003 1.5100e- 003 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 4.3309 4.3309 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 4.3659 Total 3.0400e003 0.0285 0.0367 5.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.6500e- 003 1.5100e- 003 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 4.3309 4.3309 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 4.3659 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.3200e003 3.1500e- 003 0.0368 1.0000e- 004 0.0113 7.0000e- 005 0.0114 3.0000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.0700e- 003 0.0000 9.2704 9.2704 3.0000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 9.3599 Total 4.3200e003 3.1500e- 003 0.0368 1.0000e- 004 0.0113 7.0000e- 005 0.0114 3.0000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.0700e- 003 0.0000 9.2704 9.2704 3.0000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 9.3599 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 25 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 577, Packet Page 580

3.7 Building Interiors - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.0400e003 0.0285 0.0367 5.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.6500e- 003 1.5100e- 003 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 4.3309 4.3309 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 4.3659 Total 3.0400e003 0.0285 0.0367 5.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.6500e- 003 1.5100e- 003 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 4.3309 4.3309 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 4.3659 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.3200e003 3.1500e- 003 0.0368 1.0000e- 004 0.0113 7.0000e- 005 0.0114 3.0000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.0700e- 003 0.0000 9.2704 9.2704 3.0000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 9.3599 Total 4.3200e003 3.1500e- 003 0.0368 1.0000e- 004 0.0113 7.0000e- 005 0.0114 3.0000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.0700e- 003 0.0000 9.2704 9.2704 3.0000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 9.3599 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 26 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 578, Packet Page 581

3.7 Building Interiors - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.5700e003 0.0243 0.0336 5.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 1.1900e- 003 1.1900e- 003 0.0000 3.9784 3.9784 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.0106 Total 2.5700e003 0.0243 0.0336 5.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 1.1900e- 003 1.1900e- 003 0.0000 3.9784 3.9784 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.0106 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 3.7200e003 2.5800e- 003 0.0314 9.0000e- 005 0.0104 6.0000e- 005 0.0104 2.7600e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.8100e- 003 0.0000 8.3228 8.3228 2.5000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 8.3991 Total 3.7200e003 2.5800e- 003 0.0314 9.0000e- 005 0.0104 6.0000e- 005 0.0104 2.7600e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.8100e- 003 0.0000 8.3228 8.3228 2.5000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 8.3991 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 27 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 579, Packet Page 582

3.7 Building Interiors - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.5700e003 0.0243 0.0336 5.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 1.1900e- 003 1.1900e- 003 0.0000 3.9784 3.9784 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.0105 Total 2.5700e003 0.0243 0.0336 5.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 003 1.3000e- 003 1.1900e- 003 1.1900e- 003 0.0000 3.9784 3.9784 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.0105 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 3.7200e003 2.5800e- 003 0.0314 9.0000e- 005 0.0104 6.0000e- 005 0.0104 2.7600e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.8100e- 003 0.0000 8.3228 8.3228 2.5000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 8.3991 Total 3.7200e003 2.5800e- 003 0.0314 9.0000e- 005 0.0104 6.0000e- 005 0.0104 2.7600e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.8100e- 003 0.0000 8.3228 8.3228 2.5000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 8.3991 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 28 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 580, Packet Page 583

3.8 Site hard/soft scape - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4600e003 0.0451 0.0753 1.1000e- 004 1.8300e- 003 1.8300e- 003 1.6800e- 003 1.6800e- 003 0.0000 9.2482 9.2482 2.9900e- 003 0.0000 9.3230 Total 4.4600e003 0.0451 0.0753 1.1000e- 004 1.8300e- 003 1.8300e- 003 1.6800e- 003 1.6800e- 003 0.0000 9.2482 9.2482 2.9900e- 003 0.0000 9.3230 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.6000e004 0.0290 8.7700e- 003 1.2000e- 004 3.8600e- 003 1.8000e- 004 4.0400e- 003 1.1200e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 11.2539 11.2539 1.0000e- 004 1.6500e- 003 11.7490 Worker 4.2400e003 2.9400e- 003 0.0358 1.0000e- 004 0.0118 7.0000e- 005 0.0119 3.1400e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.2100e- 003 0.0000 9.4817 9.4817 2.9000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 9.5685 Total 5.0000e003 0.0319 0.0445 2.2000e- 004 0.0157 2.5000e- 004 0.0159 4.2600e- 003 2.4000e- 004 4.5000e- 003 0.0000 20.7356 20.7356 3.9000e- 004 1.9200e- 003 21.3176 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 29 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 581, Packet Page 584

3.8 Site hard/soft scape - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4600e003 0.0451 0.0753 1.1000e- 004 1.8300e- 003 1.8300e- 003 1.6800e- 003 1.6800e- 003 0.0000 9.2482 9.2482 2.9900e- 003 0.0000 9.3230 Total 4.4600e003 0.0451 0.0753 1.1000e- 004 1.8300e- 003 1.8300e- 003 1.6800e- 003 1.6800e- 003 0.0000 9.2482 9.2482 2.9900e- 003 0.0000 9.3230 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.6000e004 0.0290 8.7700e- 003 1.2000e- 004 3.8600e- 003 1.8000e- 004 4.0400e- 003 1.1200e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 11.2539 11.2539 1.0000e- 004 1.6500e- 003 11.7490 Worker 4.2400e003 2.9400e- 003 0.0358 1.0000e- 004 0.0118 7.0000e- 005 0.0119 3.1400e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.2100e- 003 0.0000 9.4817 9.4817 2.9000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 9.5685 Total 5.0000e003 0.0319 0.0445 2.2000e- 004 0.0157 2.5000e- 004 0.0159 4.2600e- 003 2.4000e- 004 4.5000e- 003 0.0000 20.7356 20.7356 3.9000e- 004 1.9200e- 003 21.3176 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 30 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 582, Packet Page 585 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.1538 0.1843 1.2813 2.3800e003 0.2372 2.1900e- 003 0.2394 0.0634 2.0500e- 003 0.0655 0.0000 225.1100 225.1100 0.0177 0.0122 229.1847 Unmitigated 0.1538 0.1843 1.2813 2.3800e003 0.2372 2.1900e- 003 0.2394 0.0634 2.0500e- 003 0.0655 0.0000 225.1100 225.1100 0.0177 0.0122 229.1847

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Hotel 351.12 343.98 249.90 637,693 637,693
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 351.12 343.98 249.90 637,693 637,693
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Hotel 0.517882 0.052795 0.193633 0.146997 0.027981 0.006802 0.010707 0.009580 0.001188 0.000578 0.027032 0.001276 0.003550 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 31 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 583, Packet Page 586 Parking Lot 0.517882 0.052795 0.193633 0.146997 0.027981 0.006802 0.010707 0.009580 0.001188 0.000578 0.027032 0.001276 0.003550

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 39.2006 39.2006 6.3400e003 7.7000e- 004 39.5882 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 42.2983 42.2983 6.8400e003 8.3000e- 004 42.7166 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0106 0.0962 0.0808 5.8000e004 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 0.0000 104.6660 104.6660 2.0100e- 003 1.9200e- 003 105.2880 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.0144 0.1313 0.1103 7.9000e004 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 0.0000 142.8980 142.8980 2.7400e- 003 2.6200e- 003 143.7472 Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures EnergyExceed Title 24
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 32 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 584, Packet Page 587

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Hotel 2.67781e
+006

0.0144 0.1313 0.1103 7.9000e004 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 0.0000 142.8980 142.8980 2.7400e- 003 2.6200e- 003 143.7472 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0144 0.1313 0.1103 7.9000e004 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 9.9800e- 003 0.0000 142.8980 142.8980 2.7400e- 003 2.6200e- 003 143.7472 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Hotel 1.96137e
+006

0.0106 0.0962 0.0808 5.8000e004 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 0.0000 104.6660 104.6660 2.0100e- 003 1.9200e- 003 105.2880 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0106 0.0962 0.0808 5.8000e004 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 7.3100e- 003 0.0000 104.6660 104.6660 2.0100e- 003 1.9200e- 003 105.2880 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 33 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 585, Packet Page 588

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

6.0 Area Detail
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Hotel 451282 41.7543 6.7600e003 8.2000e- 004 42.1672
Parking Lot 5880 0.5440 9.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.5494 Total 42.2983 6.8500e003 8.3000e- 004 42.7166
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Hotel 417801 38.6566 6.2500e003 7.6000e- 004 39.0388
Parking Lot 5880 0.5440 9.0000e005 1.0000e- 005 0.5494 Total 39.2006 6.3400e003 7.7000e- 004 39.5882
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 34 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 586, Packet Page 589

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2821 1.0000e005 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2200e- 003 Unmitigated 0.2821 1.0000e005 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2200e- 003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0428 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.2393 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.0000e004 1.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2200e- 003 Total 0.2821 1.0000e005 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2200e- 003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 35 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 587, Packet Page 590

6.2 Area by SubCategory

7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures WaterInstall Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow ToiletInstall Low Flow ShowerUse Water Efficient Irrigation System ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0428 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.2393 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.0000e004 1.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2200e- 003 Total 0.2821 1.0000e005 1.0700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2200e- 003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 36 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 588, Packet Page 591 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 0.7331 0.0279 6.6000e004 1.6274
Unmitigated 0.9097 0.0348 8.3000e004 2.0276

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Hotel 1.0654 /

0.118378

0.9097 0.0348 8.3000e004 2.0276
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.9097 0.0348 8.3000e004 2.0276
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 37 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 589, Packet Page 592

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Hotel 0.852323 /

0.111157

0.7331 0.0279 6.6000e004 1.6274
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.7331 0.0279 6.6000e004 1.6274
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Unmitigated 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 38 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 590, Packet Page 593

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Hotel 23 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Hotel 23 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 4.6688 0.2759 0.0000 11.5667
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 39 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 591, Packet Page 594

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:15 PM Page 40 of 40 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 592, Packet Page 595 Avid Hotel Project
Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Per information provided by clientOff-road Equipment - Applicant provided - used in Noise assessment. Activity 1 in Appendix D.Trips and VMT - Demolition - Grading - 1,349 cubic yard exported per project description Architectural Coating - MBARD rule 426Area Coating - MBARD Rule 4261.1 Land Usage Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Adjusted by 20% for Cal Green Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 42.00 Space 0.38 16,800.00 0
Hotel 42.00 Room 1.40 60,984.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban4
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.8 53

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2025 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 1 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 593, Packet Page 596 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation - Reduced by 30% for 2019 title 24Water Mitigation - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - from noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - from noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - from noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - noise assessment Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 165.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 75.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 15.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 90.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 75.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 90.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 1.88
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 81.00tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 402.00 247.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 132.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.73tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.40tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 2 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 594, Packet Page 597 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.31 0.31
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.42 0.36
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Concrete/Industrial Saws Excavators tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Rubber Tired Dozers Off-Highway TruckstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType ExcavatorstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Plate Compactors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType ExcavatorstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Plate Compactors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Aerial LiftstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PaverstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType RollerstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 3 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 595, Packet Page 598 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 3.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 7.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 169.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 13.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 4 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 596, Packet Page 599

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 13.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 13.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 5 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 597, Packet Page 600

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 1.0314 9.4146 12.0240 0.0239 0.6859 0.4248 1.1107 0.1187 0.3909 0.5096 0.0000 2,334.773 6 2,334.773
6 0.6815 0.0278 2,360.105
8 2024 0.4845 4.1249 6.8211 0.0117 0.3592 0.1785 0.5126 0.0973 0.1643 0.2452 0.0000 1,161.137 2 1,161.137
2 0.2648 0.0476 1,175.265
2 2025 0.2118 1.6795 2.6957 7.2900e003 0.3592 0.0462 0.4054 0.0973 0.0427 0.1399 0.0000 746.4312 746.4312 0.0822 0.0464 762.3273 Maximum 1.0314 9.4146 12.0240 0.0239 0.6859 0.4248 1.1107 0.1187 0.3909 0.5096 0.0000 2,334.773 6 2,334.773
6 0.6815 0.0476 2,360.105
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 1.0314 9.4146 12.0240 0.0239 0.6859 0.4248 1.1107 0.1187 0.3909 0.5096 0.0000 2,334.773 6 2,334.773
6 0.6815 0.0278 2,360.105
8 2024 0.4845 4.1249 6.8211 0.0117 0.3592 0.1785 0.5126 0.0973 0.1643 0.2452 0.0000 1,161.137 2 1,161.137
2 0.2648 0.0476 1,175.265
2 2025 0.2118 1.6795 2.6957 7.2900e003 0.3592 0.0462 0.4054 0.0973 0.0427 0.1399 0.0000 746.4312 746.4312 0.0822 0.0464 762.3273 Maximum 1.0314 9.4146 12.0240 0.0239 0.6859 0.4248 1.1107 0.1187 0.3909 0.5096 0.0000 2,334.773 6 2,334.773
6 0.6815 0.0476 2,360.105
8 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 6 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 598, Packet Page 601 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 7 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 599, Packet Page 602

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.5460 8.0000e005 8.5500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0184 0.0184 5.0000e- 005 0.0196 Energy 0.0791 0.7193 0.6042 4.3200e003 0.0547 0.0547 0.0547 0.0547 863.1128 863.1128 0.0165 0.0158 868.2418 Mobile 0.9485 0.9756 7.1335 0.0142 1.4073 0.0126 1.4200 0.3753 0.0118 0.3871 1,483.867 7 1,483.867
7 0.1044 0.0731 1,508.247
8 Total 2.5737 1.6950 7.7463 0.0186 1.4073 0.0673 1.4747 0.3753 0.0665 0.4418 2,346.998 9 2,346.998
9 0.1210 0.0889 2,376.509
2 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.5460 8.0000e005 8.5500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0184 0.0184 5.0000e- 005 0.0196 Energy 0.0580 0.5268 0.4425 3.1600e003 0.0400 0.0400 0.0400 0.0400 632.1893 632.1893 0.0121 0.0116 635.9461 Mobile 0.9485 0.9756 7.1335 0.0142 1.4073 0.0126 1.4200 0.3753 0.0118 0.3871 1,483.867 7 1,483.867
7 0.1044 0.0731 1,508.247
8 Total 2.5525 1.5025 7.5846 0.0174 1.4073 0.0527 1.4600 0.3753 0.0519 0.4272 2,116.075 4 2,116.075
4 0.1166 0.0846 2,144.213
5 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 8 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 600, Packet Page 603

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/1/2023 8/21/2023 5 15
2 Grading/Excavations Grading 8/22/2023 10/2/2023 5 303 Foundations (site & building) Building Construction 10/3/2023 2/5/2024 5 904 Structure Frame Building Construction 2/6/2024 5/20/2024 5 755 Building Exteriors Building Construction 5/21/2024 9/2/2024 5 756 Building Interiors Building Construction 9/3/2024 4/21/2025 5 1657 Site hard/soft scape Building Construction 4/22/2025 8/25/2025 5 90 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Building Exteriors Pumps 1 84 0.74
Building Exteriors Off-Highway Trucks 1 402 0.38Building Interiors Pumps 1 84 0.74 Building Interiors Off-Highway Trucks 1 402 0.38
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.82 11.35 2.09 6.25 0.00 21.72 0.99 0.00 21.99 3.31 0.00 9.84 9.84 3.65 4.76 9.77 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coatin g – sqft)
Acres of Gradin
g (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Gradin
g (Gradin
g Phase): 1.88
Acres of Pavin
g: 0.38
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 9 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 601, Packet Page 604 Site hard/soft scape Off-Highway Trucks 3 402 0.38
Site hard/soft scape Pavers 1 132 0.36
Site hard/soft scape Rollers 1 80 0.38
Site hard/soft scape Pumps 1 84 0.74
Demolition Excavators 2 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Grading/Excavations Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41Grading/Excavations Rubber Tired Dozers 0 7.00 247 0.40Grading/Excavations Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37Foundations (site & building) Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41 Foundations (site & building) Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40Foundations (site & building) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Structure Frame Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Structure Frame Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Structure Frame Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74
Structure Frame Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 6.00 97 0.37 Structure Frame Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Exteriors Cement and Mortar Mixers 0 6.00 9 0.56 Building Exteriors Pavers 0 6.00 130 0.42
Building Exteriors Paving Equipment 0 8.00 132 0.36
Building Exteriors Rollers 0 7.00 80 0.38
Building Exteriors Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Building Interiors
Air Compressors 0 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73Foundations (site & building) Cranes 0 6.00 231 0.29 Building Exteriors Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Interiors Cranes 0 6.00 231 0.29
Site hard/soft scape Cranes 0 6.00 231 0.29
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 10 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 602, Packet Page 605 Foundations (site & building) Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20
Building Exteriors Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20
Building Interiors Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Site hard/soft scape Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20
Foundations (site & building) Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74Building Exteriors Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74 Building Interiors Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74
Site hard/soft scape Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40Building Interiors Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 6.00 97 0.37 Site hard/soft scape Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Foundations (site & building) Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Exteriors Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Interiors Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Site hard/soft scape Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Grading/Excavations Excavators 1 158 0.38Grading/Excavations Plate Compactors 1 8 0.43Grading/Excavations Off-Highway Trucks 2 402 0.38Foundations (site & building) Excavators 1 158 0.38Foundations (site & building) Off-Highway Trucks 3 402 0.38Foundations (site & building) Pumps 2 84 0.74Foundations (site & building) Plate Compactors 1 8 0.43Structure Frame Off-Highway Trucks 1 402 0.38Building Exteriors Aerial Lifts 1 63 0.31
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 11 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 603, Packet Page 606

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5594 0.0000 0.5594 0.0847 0.0000 0.0847 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9918 9.0378 11.6535 0.0216 0.4211 0.4211 0.3874 0.3874 2,093.975 7 2,093.975
7 0.6772 2,110.906
5 Total 0.9918 9.0378 11.6535 0.0216 0.5594 0.4211 0.9805 0.0847 0.3874 0.4721 2,093.975 7 2,093.975
7 0.6772 2,110.906
5 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 38.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading/Excavations 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Foundations (site &
building)
10 33.00 0.00 169.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Structure Frame 3 33.00 13.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Exteriors 4 33.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Interiors 3 33.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site hard/soft scape 7 33.00 13.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 12 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 604, Packet Page 607

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 6.4700e003 0.3548 0.0758 1.5300e- 003 0.0443 3.2300e- 003 0.0476 0.0122 3.0900e- 003 0.0152 163.1585 163.1585 1.8200e- 003 0.0257 170.8675 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0332 0.0220 0.2947 7.6000e004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 77.6394 77.6394 2.4500e- 003 2.1200e- 003 78.3318 Total 0.0396 0.3768 0.3705 2.2900e003 0.1265 3.7500e- 003 0.1302 0.0339 3.5700e- 003 0.0375 240.7979 240.7979 4.2700e- 003 0.0278 249.1992 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5594 0.0000 0.5594 0.0847 0.0000 0.0847 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9918 9.0378 11.6535 0.0216 0.4211 0.4211 0.3874 0.3874 0.0000 2,093.975 7 2,093.975
7 0.6772 2,110.906
5 Total 0.9918 9.0378 11.6535 0.0216 0.5594 0.4211 0.9805 0.0847 0.3874 0.4721 0.0000 2,093.975 7 2,093.975
7 0.6772 2,110.906
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 13 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 605, Packet Page 608

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 6.4700e003 0.3548 0.0758 1.5300e- 003 0.0443 3.2300e- 003 0.0476 0.0122 3.0900e- 003 0.0152 163.1585 163.1585 1.8200e- 003 0.0257 170.8675 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0332 0.0220 0.2947 7.6000e004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 77.6394 77.6394 2.4500e- 003 2.1200e- 003 78.3318 Total 0.0396 0.3768 0.3705 2.2900e003 0.1265 3.7500e- 003 0.1302 0.0339 3.5700e- 003 0.0375 240.7979 240.7979 4.2700e- 003 0.0278 249.1992 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Grading/Excavations - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.0665 0.0000 0.0665 7.1800e003 0.0000 7.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4541 4.6070 6.6940 9.3500e003 0.2274 0.2274 0.2092 0.2092 904.7295 904.7295 0.2926 912.0447 Total 0.4541 4.6070 6.6940 9.3500e003 0.0665 0.2274 0.2939 7.1800e- 003 0.2092 0.2164 904.7295 904.7295 0.2926 912.0447 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 14 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 606, Packet Page 609

3.3 Grading/Excavations - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0597 0.0396 0.5304 1.3700e003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 139.7509 139.7509 4.4200e- 003 3.8100e- 003 140.9972 Total 0.0597 0.0396 0.5304 1.3700e003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 139.7509 139.7509 4.4200e- 003 3.8100e- 003 140.9972 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.0665 0.0000 0.0665 7.1800e003 0.0000 7.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4541 4.6070 6.6940 9.3500e003 0.2274 0.2274 0.2092 0.2092 0.0000 904.7295 904.7295 0.2926 912.0447 Total 0.4541 4.6070 6.6940 9.3500e003 0.0665 0.2274 0.2939 7.1800e- 003 0.2092 0.2164 0.0000 904.7295 904.7295 0.2926 912.0447 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 15 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 607, Packet Page 610

3.3 Grading/Excavations - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0597 0.0396 0.5304 1.3700e003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 139.7509 139.7509 4.4200e- 003 3.8100e- 003 140.9972 Total 0.0597 0.0396 0.5304 1.3700e003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 139.7509 139.7509 4.4200e- 003 3.8100e- 003 140.9972 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3973 4.0312 5.8572 8.1800e003 0.1990 0.1990 0.1831 0.1831 791.6383 791.6383 0.2560 798.0391 Total 0.3973 4.0312 5.8572 8.1800e003 0.1990 0.1990 0.1831 0.1831 791.6383 791.6383 0.2560 798.0391 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 16 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 608, Packet Page 611

3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 4.8000e003 0.2630 0.0562 1.1300e- 003 0.0329 2.3900e- 003 0.0353 9.0100e- 003 2.2900e- 003 0.0113 120.9377 120.9377 1.3500e- 003 0.0191 126.6518 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1094 0.0725 0.9725 2.5000e003 0.2711 1.7100e- 003 0.2728 0.0719 1.5800e- 003 0.0735 256.2100 256.2100 8.1000e- 003 6.9900e- 003 258.4949 Total 0.1142 0.3355 1.0286 3.6300e003 0.3039 4.1000e- 003 0.3081 0.0809 3.8700e- 003 0.0848 377.1477 377.1477 9.4500e- 003 0.0261 385.1467 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3973 4.0312 5.8572 8.1800e003 0.1990 0.1990 0.1831 0.1831 0.0000 791.6383 791.6383 0.2560 798.0391 Total 0.3973 4.0312 5.8572 8.1800e003 0.1990 0.1990 0.1831 0.1831 0.0000 791.6383 791.6383 0.2560 798.0391 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 17 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 609, Packet Page 612

3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 4.8000e003 0.2630 0.0562 1.1300e- 003 0.0329 2.3900e- 003 0.0353 9.0100e- 003 2.2900e- 003 0.0113 120.9377 120.9377 1.3500e- 003 0.0191 126.6518 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1094 0.0725 0.9725 2.5000e003 0.2711 1.7100e- 003 0.2728 0.0719 1.5800e- 003 0.0735 256.2100 256.2100 8.1000e- 003 6.9900e- 003 258.4949 Total 0.1142 0.3355 1.0286 3.6300e003 0.3039 4.1000e- 003 0.3081 0.0809 3.8700e- 003 0.0848 377.1477 377.1477 9.4500e- 003 0.0261 385.1467 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3778 3.8017 5.8685 8.1800e003 0.1745 0.1745 0.1605 0.1605 792.1377 792.1377 0.2562 798.5425 Total 0.3778 3.8017 5.8685 8.1800e003 0.1745 0.1745 0.1605 0.1605 792.1377 792.1377 0.2562 798.5425 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 18 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 610, Packet Page 613

3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 4.7400e003 0.2589 0.0564 1.1100e- 003 0.0329 2.3700e- 003 0.0352 9.0100e- 003 2.2700e- 003 0.0113 118.8646 118.8646 1.3500e- 003 0.0187 124.4810 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Total 0.1067 0.3232 0.9526 3.5300e003 0.3040 3.9900e- 003 0.3079 0.0809 3.7600e- 003 0.0847 368.9995 368.9995 8.6300e- 003 0.0252 376.7227 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3778 3.8017 5.8685 8.1800e003 0.1745 0.1745 0.1605 0.1605 0.0000 792.1377 792.1377 0.2562 798.5425 Total 0.3778 3.8017 5.8685 8.1800e003 0.1745 0.1745 0.1605 0.1605 0.0000 792.1377 792.1377 0.2562 798.5425 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 19 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 611, Packet Page 614

3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 4.7400e003 0.2589 0.0564 1.1100e- 003 0.0329 2.3700e- 003 0.0352 9.0100e- 003 2.2700e- 003 0.0113 118.8646 118.8646 1.3500e- 003 0.0187 124.4810 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Total 0.1067 0.3232 0.9526 3.5300e003 0.3040 3.9900e- 003 0.3079 0.0809 3.7600e- 003 0.0847 368.9995 368.9995 8.6300e- 003 0.0252 376.7227 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.5 Structure Frame - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3195 3.2909 2.1855 5.4700e003 0.1476 0.1476 0.1358 0.1358 530.1286 530.1286 0.1715 534.4150 Total 0.3195 3.2909 2.1855 5.4700e003 0.1476 0.1476 0.1358 0.1358 530.1286 530.1286 0.1715 534.4150 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 20 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 612, Packet Page 615

3.5 Structure Frame - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0180 0.6297 0.1982 2.6400e003 0.0881 4.1700e- 003 0.0922 0.0254 3.9900e- 003 0.0293 280.3496 280.3496 2.4300e- 003 0.0412 292.6756 Worker 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Total 0.1199 0.6940 1.0945 5.0600e003 0.3592 5.7900e- 003 0.3649 0.0973 5.4800e- 003 0.1027 530.4845 530.4845 9.7100e- 003 0.0476 544.9172 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3195 3.2909 2.1855 5.4700e003 0.1476 0.1476 0.1358 0.1358 0.0000 530.1286 530.1286 0.1715 534.4150 Total 0.3195 3.2909 2.1855 5.4700e003 0.1476 0.1476 0.1358 0.1358 0.0000 530.1286 530.1286 0.1715 534.4150 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 21 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 613, Packet Page 616

3.5 Structure Frame - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0180 0.6297 0.1982 2.6400e003 0.0881 4.1700e- 003 0.0922 0.0254 3.9900e- 003 0.0293 280.3496 280.3496 2.4300e- 003 0.0412 292.6756 Worker 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Total 0.1199 0.6940 1.0945 5.0600e003 0.3592 5.7900e- 003 0.3649 0.0973 5.4800e- 003 0.1027 530.4845 530.4845 9.7100e- 003 0.0476 544.9172 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.6 Building Exteriors - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.2488 2.6282 1.3310 4.3300e003 0.1094 0.1094 0.1006 0.1006 419.1055 419.1055 0.1356 422.4942 Total 0.2488 2.6282 1.3310 4.3300e003 0.1094 0.1094 0.1006 0.1006 419.1055 419.1055 0.1356 422.4942 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 22 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 614, Packet Page 617

3.6 Building Exteriors - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Total 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.2488 2.6282 1.3310 4.3300e003 0.1094 0.1094 0.1006 0.1006 0.0000 419.1055 419.1055 0.1356 422.4942 Total 0.2488 2.6282 1.3310 4.3300e003 0.1094 0.1094 0.1006 0.1006 0.0000 419.1055 419.1055 0.1356 422.4942 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 23 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 615, Packet Page 618

3.6 Building Exteriors - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Total 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Building Interiors - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.0707 0.6626 0.8545 1.1500e003 0.0383 0.0383 0.0352 0.0352 111.0231 111.0231 0.0359 111.9208 Total 0.0707 0.6626 0.8545 1.1500e003 0.0383 0.0383 0.0352 0.0352 111.0231 111.0231 0.0359 111.9208 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 24 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 616, Packet Page 619

3.7 Building Interiors - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Total 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.0707 0.6626 0.8545 1.1500e003 0.0383 0.0383 0.0352 0.0352 0.0000 111.0231 111.0231 0.0359 111.9208 Total 0.0707 0.6626 0.8545 1.1500e003 0.0383 0.0383 0.0352 0.0352 0.0000 111.0231 111.0231 0.0359 111.9208 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 25 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 617, Packet Page 620

3.7 Building Interiors - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Total 0.1019 0.0643 0.8962 2.4200e003 0.2711 1.6200e- 003 0.2727 0.0719 1.4900e- 003 0.0734 250.1349 250.1349 7.2800e- 003 6.4600e- 003 252.2416 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.7 Building Interiors - 2025 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.0652 0.6139 0.8503 1.1500e003 0.0329 0.0329 0.0302 0.0302 111.0231 111.0231 0.0359 111.9208 Total 0.0652 0.6139 0.8503 1.1500e003 0.0329 0.0329 0.0302 0.0302 111.0231 111.0231 0.0359 111.9208 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 26 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 618, Packet Page 621

3.7 Building Interiors - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0955 0.0574 0.8314 2.3500e003 0.2711 1.5400e- 003 0.2726 0.0719 1.4200e- 003 0.0733 244.4336 244.4336 6.5700e- 003 6.0000e- 003 246.3872 Total 0.0955 0.0574 0.8314 2.3500e003 0.2711 1.5400e- 003 0.2726 0.0719 1.4200e- 003 0.0733 244.4336 244.4336 6.5700e- 003 6.0000e- 003 246.3872 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.0652 0.6139 0.8503 1.1500e003 0.0329 0.0329 0.0302 0.0302 0.0000 111.0231 111.0231 0.0359 111.9208 Total 0.0652 0.6139 0.8503 1.1500e003 0.0329 0.0329 0.0302 0.0302 0.0000 111.0231 111.0231 0.0359 111.9208 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 27 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 619, Packet Page 622

3.7 Building Interiors - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0955 0.0574 0.8314 2.3500e003 0.2711 1.5400e- 003 0.2726 0.0719 1.4200e- 003 0.0733 244.4336 244.4336 6.5700e- 003 6.0000e- 003 246.3872 Total 0.0955 0.0574 0.8314 2.3500e003 0.2711 1.5400e- 003 0.2726 0.0719 1.4200e- 003 0.0733 244.4336 244.4336 6.5700e- 003 6.0000e- 003 246.3872 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.8 Site hard/soft scape - 2025 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.0991 1.0013 1.6723 2.3400e003 0.0406 0.0406 0.0373 0.0373 226.5419 226.5419 0.0733 228.3736 Total 0.0991 1.0013 1.6723 2.3400e003 0.0406 0.0406 0.0373 0.0373 226.5419 226.5419 0.0733 228.3736 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 28 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 620, Packet Page 623

3.8 Site hard/soft scape - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0173 0.6208 0.1921 2.6000e003 0.0881 4.0800e- 003 0.0922 0.0254 3.9100e- 003 0.0293 275.4558 275.4558 2.3600e- 003 0.0404 287.5666 Worker 0.0955 0.0574 0.8314 2.3500e003 0.2711 1.5400e- 003 0.2726 0.0719 1.4200e- 003 0.0733 244.4336 244.4336 6.5700e- 003 6.0000e- 003 246.3872 Total 0.1127 0.6782 1.0234 4.9500e003 0.3592 5.6200e- 003 0.3648 0.0973 5.3300e- 003 0.1026 519.8893 519.8893 8.9300e- 003 0.0464 533.9537 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.0991 1.0013 1.6723 2.3400e003 0.0406 0.0406 0.0373 0.0373 0.0000 226.5419 226.5419 0.0733 228.3736 Total 0.0991 1.0013 1.6723 2.3400e003 0.0406 0.0406 0.0373 0.0373 0.0000 226.5419 226.5419 0.0733 228.3736 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 29 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 621, Packet Page 624

3.8 Site hard/soft scape - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0173 0.6208 0.1921 2.6000e003 0.0881 4.0800e- 003 0.0922 0.0254 3.9100e- 003 0.0293 275.4558 275.4558 2.3600e- 003 0.0404 287.5666 Worker 0.0955 0.0574 0.8314 2.3500e003 0.2711 1.5400e- 003 0.2726 0.0719 1.4200e- 003 0.0733 244.4336 244.4336 6.5700e- 003 6.0000e- 003 246.3872 Total 0.1127 0.6782 1.0234 4.9500e003 0.3592 5.6200e- 003 0.3648 0.0973 5.3300e- 003 0.1026 519.8893 519.8893 8.9300e- 003 0.0464 533.9537 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 30 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 622, Packet Page 625 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.9485 0.9756 7.1335 0.0142 1.4073 0.0126 1.4200 0.3753 0.0118 0.3871 1,483.867 7 1,483.867
7 0.1044 0.0731 1,508.247
8 Unmitigated 0.9485 0.9756 7.1335 0.0142 1.4073 0.0126 1.4200 0.3753 0.0118 0.3871 1,483.867 7 1,483.867
7 0.1044 0.0731 1,508.247
8 4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Hotel 351.12 343.98 249.90 637,693 637,693
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 351.12 343.98 249.90 637,693 637,693
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Hotel 0.517882 0.052795 0.193633 0.146997 0.027981 0.006802 0.010707 0.009580 0.001188 0.000578 0.027032 0.001276 0.003550 Parking Lot 0.517882 0.052795 0.193633 0.146997 0.027981 0.006802 0.010707 0.009580 0.001188 0.000578 0.027032 0.001276 0.003550

5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 31 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 623, Packet Page 626 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0580 0.5268 0.4425 3.1600e003 0.0400 0.0400 0.0400 0.0400 632.1893 632.1893 0.0121 0.0116 635.9461 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.0791 0.7193 0.6042 4.3200e003 0.0547 0.0547 0.0547 0.0547 863.1128 863.1128 0.0165 0.0158 868.2418 Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures EnergyExceed Title 24
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 32 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 624, Packet Page 627

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

6.0 Area Detail
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Hotel 7336.46 0.0791 0.7193 0.6042 4.3200e003 0.0547 0.0547 0.0547 0.0547 863.1128 863.1128 0.0165 0.0158 868.2418 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0791 0.7193 0.6042 4.3200e003 0.0547 0.0547 0.0547 0.0547 863.1128 863.1128 0.0165 0.0158 868.2418 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Hotel 5.37361 0.0580 0.5268 0.4425 3.1600e003 0.0400 0.0400 0.0400 0.0400 632.1893 632.1893 0.0121 0.0116 635.9461 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0580 0.5268 0.4425 3.1600e003 0.0400 0.0400 0.0400 0.0400 632.1893 632.1893 0.0121 0.0116 635.9461 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 33 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 625, Packet Page 628

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.5460 8.0000e005 8.5500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0184 0.0184 5.0000e- 005 0.0196 Unmitigated 1.5460 8.0000e005 8.5500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0184 0.0184 5.0000e- 005 0.0196

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2342 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3110 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 7.9000e004 8.0000e- 005 8.5500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0184 0.0184 5.0000e- 005 0.0196 Total 1.5460 8.0000e005 8.5500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0184 0.0184 5.0000e- 005 0.0196 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 34 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 626, Packet Page 629

6.2 Area by SubCategory

7.0 Water Detail7.1 Mitigation Measures WaterInstall Low Flow Bathroom FaucetInstall Low Flow Kitchen FaucetInstall Low Flow ToiletInstall Low Flow ShowerUse Water Efficient Irrigation System ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2342 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3110 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 7.9000e004 8.0000e- 005 8.5500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0184 0.0184 5.0000e- 005 0.0196 Total 1.5460 8.0000e005 8.5500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0184 0.0184 5.0000e- 005 0.0196 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 35 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 627, Packet Page 630

11.0 Vegetation

8.0 Waste Detail8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:21 PM Page 36 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 628, Packet Page 631 Avid Hotel Project
Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter
Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - Per information provided by clientOff-road Equipment - Applicant provided - used in Noise assessment. Activity 1 in Appendix D.Trips and VMT - Demolition - Grading - 1,349 cubic yard exported per project description Architectural Coating - MBARD rule 426Area Coating - MBARD Rule 4261.1 Land Usage Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Adjusted by 20% for Cal Green Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 42.00 Space 0.38 16,800.00 0
Hotel 42.00 Room 1.40 60,984.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Urban4
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.8 53

1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2025 Operational Year
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 1 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 629, Packet Page 632 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Energy Mitigation - Reduced by 30% for 2019 title 24Water Mitigation - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - from noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - from noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - from noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - noise assessmentOff-road Equipment - noise assessment Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 165.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 75.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 15.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 90.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 75.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 30.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 90.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 1.88
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 158.00 81.00tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 402.00 247.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 132.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.73tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.40tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 2 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 630, Packet Page 633 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.31 0.31
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.42 0.36
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.38 0.38
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Concrete/Industrial Saws Excavators tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Rubber Tired Dozers Off-Highway TruckstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType ExcavatorstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Plate Compactors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType ExcavatorstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Plate Compactors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Aerial LiftstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Off-Highway Trucks tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PaverstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType RollerstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType PumpstblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 3 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 631, Packet Page 634 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 3.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 7.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 169.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 13.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 4 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 632, Packet Page 635

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 13.00 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 13.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 5 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 633, Packet Page 636

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 1.0331 9.4404 12.0225 0.0239 0.6859 0.4248 1.1107 0.1187 0.3909 0.5096 0.0000 2,330.815 7 2,330.815
7 0.6818 0.0282 2,356.267
8 2024 0.4909 4.1559 6.8165 0.0116 0.3592 0.1785 0.5126 0.0973 0.1643 0.2452 0.0000 1,147.911 2 1,147.911
2 0.2657 0.0488 1,162.382
3 2025 0.2178 1.7303 2.6994 7.1600e003 0.3592 0.0462 0.4054 0.0973 0.0427 0.1399 0.0000 733.9072 733.9072 0.0830 0.0476 750.1520 Maximum 1.0331 9.4404 12.0225 0.0239 0.6859 0.4248 1.1107 0.1187 0.3909 0.5096 0.0000 2,330.815 7 2,330.815
7 0.6818 0.0488 2,356.267
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 1.0331 9.4404 12.0225 0.0239 0.6859 0.4248 1.1107 0.1187 0.3909 0.5096 0.0000 2,330.815 7 2,330.815
7 0.6818 0.0282 2,356.267
8 2024 0.4909 4.1559 6.8165 0.0116 0.3592 0.1785 0.5126 0.0973 0.1643 0.2452 0.0000 1,147.911 2 1,147.911
2 0.2657 0.0488 1,162.382
3 2025 0.2178 1.7303 2.6994 7.1600e003 0.3592 0.0462 0.4054 0.0973 0.0427 0.1399 0.0000 733.9072 733.9072 0.0830 0.0476 750.1520 Maximum 1.0331 9.4404 12.0225 0.0239 0.6859 0.4248 1.1107 0.1187 0.3909 0.5096 0.0000 2,330.815 7 2,330.815
7 0.6818 0.0488 2,356.267
8 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 6 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 634, Packet Page 637 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 7 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 635, Packet Page 638

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.5460 8.0000e005 8.5500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0184 0.0184 5.0000e- 005 0.0196 Energy 0.0791 0.7193 0.6042 4.3200e003 0.0547 0.0547 0.0547 0.0547 863.1128 863.1128 0.0165 0.0158 868.2418 Mobile 0.8863 1.1189 7.9538 0.0137 1.4073 0.0126 1.4200 0.3753 0.0118 0.3871 1,424.838 6 1,424.838
6 0.1201 0.0804 1,451.809
4 Total 2.5115 1.8383 8.5665 0.0180 1.4073 0.0673 1.4747 0.3753 0.0665 0.4418 2,287.969 8 2,287.969
8 0.1367 0.0963 2,320.070
8 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.5460 8.0000e005 8.5500e- 003 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0184 0.0184 5.0000e- 005 0.0196 Energy 0.0580 0.5268 0.4425 3.1600e003 0.0400 0.0400 0.0400 0.0400 632.1893 632.1893 0.0121 0.0116 635.9461 Mobile 0.8863 1.1189 7.9538 0.0137 1.4073 0.0126 1.4200 0.3753 0.0118 0.3871 1,424.838 6 1,424.838
6 0.1201 0.0804 1,451.809
4 Total 2.4903 1.6458 8.4049 0.0168 1.4073 0.0527 1.4600 0.3753 0.0519 0.4272 2,057.046 3 2,057.046
3 0.1323 0.0920 2,087.775
1 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 8 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 636, Packet Page 639

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/1/2023 8/21/2023 5 15
2 Grading/Excavations Grading 8/22/2023 10/2/2023 5 303 Foundations (site & building) Building Construction 10/3/2023 2/5/2024 5 904 Structure Frame Building Construction 2/6/2024 5/20/2024 5 755 Building Exteriors Building Construction 5/21/2024 9/2/2024 5 756 Building Interiors Building Construction 9/3/2024 4/21/2025 5 1657 Site hard/soft scape Building Construction 4/22/2025 8/25/2025 5 90 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Building Exteriors Pumps 1 84 0.74
Building Exteriors Off-Highway Trucks 1 402 0.38Building Interiors Pumps 1 84 0.74 Building Interiors Off-Highway Trucks 1 402 0.38
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.84 10.47 1.89 6.45 0.00 21.71 0.99 0.00 21.98 3.31 0.00 10.09 10.09 3.23 4.39 10.01 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coatin g – sqft)
Acres of Gradin
g (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Gradin
g (Gradin
g Phase): 1.88
Acres of Pavin
g: 0.38
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 9 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 637, Packet Page 640 Site hard/soft scape Off-Highway Trucks 3 402 0.38
Site hard/soft scape Pavers 1 132 0.36
Site hard/soft scape Rollers 1 80 0.38
Site hard/soft scape Pumps 1 84 0.74
Demolition Excavators 2 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Grading/Excavations Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41Grading/Excavations Rubber Tired Dozers 0 7.00 247 0.40Grading/Excavations Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37Foundations (site & building) Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41 Foundations (site & building) Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40Foundations (site & building) Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Structure Frame Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Structure Frame Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Structure Frame Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74
Structure Frame Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 6.00 97 0.37 Structure Frame Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Exteriors Cement and Mortar Mixers 0 6.00 9 0.56 Building Exteriors Pavers 0 6.00 130 0.42
Building Exteriors Paving Equipment 0 8.00 132 0.36
Building Exteriors Rollers 0 7.00 80 0.38
Building Exteriors Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Building Interiors
Air Compressors 0 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73Foundations (site & building) Cranes 0 6.00 231 0.29 Building Exteriors Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Interiors Cranes 0 6.00 231 0.29
Site hard/soft scape Cranes 0 6.00 231 0.29
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 10 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 638, Packet Page 641 Foundations (site & building) Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20
Building Exteriors Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20
Building Interiors Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Site hard/soft scape Forklifts 0 6.00 89 0.20
Foundations (site & building) Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74Building Exteriors Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74 Building Interiors Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74
Site hard/soft scape Generator Sets 0 8.00 84 0.74
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40Building Interiors Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 6.00 97 0.37 Site hard/soft scape Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Foundations (site & building) Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Exteriors Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Building Interiors Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Site hard/soft scape Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45
Grading/Excavations Excavators 1 158 0.38Grading/Excavations Plate Compactors 1 8 0.43Grading/Excavations Off-Highway Trucks 2 402 0.38Foundations (site & building) Excavators 1 158 0.38Foundations (site & building) Off-Highway Trucks 3 402 0.38Foundations (site & building) Pumps 2 84 0.74Foundations (site & building) Plate Compactors 1 8 0.43Structure Frame Off-Highway Trucks 1 402 0.38Building Exteriors Aerial Lifts 1 63 0.31
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 11 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 639, Packet Page 642

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5594 0.0000 0.5594 0.0847 0.0000 0.0847 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9918 9.0378 11.6535 0.0216 0.4211 0.4211 0.3874 0.3874 2,093.975 7 2,093.975
7 0.6772 2,110.906
5 Total 0.9918 9.0378 11.6535 0.0216 0.5594 0.4211 0.9805 0.0847 0.3874 0.4721 2,093.975 7 2,093.975
7 0.6772 2,110.906
5 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 38.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading/Excavations 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Foundations (site &
building)
10 33.00 0.00 169.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Structure Frame 3 33.00 13.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Exteriors 4 33.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Interiors 3 33.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site hard/soft scape 7 33.00 13.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 12 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 640, Packet Page 643

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 6.0500e003 0.3752 0.0772 1.5300e- 003 0.0443 3.2400e- 003 0.0476 0.0122 3.1000e- 003 0.0153 163.3631 163.3631 1.8000e- 003 0.0258 171.0813 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0353 0.0275 0.2918 7.2000e004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 73.4770 73.4770 2.7600e- 003 2.4600e- 003 74.2799 Total 0.0413 0.4027 0.3690 2.2500e003 0.1265 3.7600e- 003 0.1302 0.0339 3.5800e- 003 0.0375 236.8400 236.8400 4.5600e- 003 0.0282 245.3612 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5594 0.0000 0.5594 0.0847 0.0000 0.0847 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9918 9.0378 11.6535 0.0216 0.4211 0.4211 0.3874 0.3874 0.0000 2,093.975 7 2,093.975
7 0.6772 2,110.906
5 Total 0.9918 9.0378 11.6535 0.0216 0.5594 0.4211 0.9805 0.0847 0.3874 0.4721 0.0000 2,093.975 7 2,093.975
7 0.6772 2,110.906
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 13 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 641, Packet Page 644

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 6.0500e003 0.3752 0.0772 1.5300e- 003 0.0443 3.2400e- 003 0.0476 0.0122 3.1000e- 003 0.0153 163.3631 163.3631 1.8000e- 003 0.0258 171.0813 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0353 0.0275 0.2918 7.2000e004 0.0822 5.2000e- 004 0.0827 0.0218 4.8000e- 004 0.0223 73.4770 73.4770 2.7600e- 003 2.4600e- 003 74.2799 Total 0.0413 0.4027 0.3690 2.2500e003 0.1265 3.7600e- 003 0.1302 0.0339 3.5800e- 003 0.0375 236.8400 236.8400 4.5600e- 003 0.0282 245.3612 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.3 Grading/Excavations - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.0665 0.0000 0.0665 7.1800e003 0.0000 7.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4541 4.6070 6.6940 9.3500e003 0.2274 0.2274 0.2092 0.2092 904.7295 904.7295 0.2926 912.0447 Total 0.4541 4.6070 6.6940 9.3500e003 0.0665 0.2274 0.2939 7.1800e- 003 0.2092 0.2164 904.7295 904.7295 0.2926 912.0447 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 14 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 642, Packet Page 645

3.3 Grading/Excavations - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0635 0.0495 0.5253 1.2900e003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 132.2585 132.2585 4.9700e- 003 4.4300e- 003 133.7039 Total 0.0635 0.0495 0.5253 1.2900e003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 132.2585 132.2585 4.9700e- 003 4.4300e- 003 133.7039 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.0665 0.0000 0.0665 7.1800e003 0.0000 7.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4541 4.6070 6.6940 9.3500e003 0.2274 0.2274 0.2092 0.2092 0.0000 904.7295 904.7295 0.2926 912.0447 Total 0.4541 4.6070 6.6940 9.3500e003 0.0665 0.2274 0.2939 7.1800e- 003 0.2092 0.2164 0.0000 904.7295 904.7295 0.2926 912.0447 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 15 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A

EXHIBIT A
Council Special Meeting, 12/15/2023, Item No. 1., Item Page 643, Packet Page 646

3.3 Grading/Excavations - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0635 0.0495 0.5253 1.2900e003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 132.2585 132.2585 4.9700e- 003 4.4300e- 003 133.7039 Total 0.0635 0.0495 0.5253 1.2900e003 0.1479 9.3000e- 004 0.1488 0.0392 8.6000e- 004 0.0401 132.2585 132.2585 4.9700e- 003 4.4300e- 003 133.7039 Mitigated Construction Off-Site3.4 Foundations (site & building) - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3973 4.0312 5.8572 8.1800e003 0.1990 0.1990 0.1831 0.1831 791.6383 791.6383 0.2560 798.0391 Total 0.3973 4.0312 5.8572 8.1800e003 0.1990 0.1990 0.1831 0.1831 791.6383 791.6383 0.2560 798.0391 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 5/9/2023 2:22 PM Page 16 of 36 Avid Hotel Project - Monterey Bay Unified APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Exhibit
A