Agenda packet — Monterey City Council, May 21, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

Council Chamber,
580 Pacific St.

Monterey, California
City Council Agenda
Council Regular Meeting
Tuesday, May 21, 2024
4:00 PM – 5:30 PM
7:00 PM – 11:00 PM
City Council
Tyller Williamson, Mayor
Kim Barber, Councilmember,
District 1
Gino Garcia, Councilmember
Alan Haffa, Councilmember
Ed Smith, Councilmember,
District 2
City Manager
Hans Uslar
HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING:
 Written comment: Members of the public may submit comment(s) to [email protected] until ½ hour before the start of the meeting. These messages are not read aloud during the meeting but are made available to the meeting body and public at https://monterey.gov/submitted-comments. All comments received become part of the record.
 In-Person: Please see the meeting location listed above. Wearing a mask is recommended and encouraged.
 Remote via ZoomGov Webinar:
o Join on a computer or smartphone: https://montereyorg.zoomgov.com/j/1607729333 An up-to-date version of the Zoom software must be used.
o Or join by telephone: Dial 833-568-8864 (Toll Free), 669-254-5252 (Campbell, CA) or 646-828-7666 (NY). If one number doesn’t work, please try another.  Enter Webinar ID: 160 772 9333 #
 If prompted to enter a participant ID, press #
 To “raise your hand,” dial *9. Once called upon, dial *6 to unmute o Need help using or updating Zoom? Read our Zoom Meeting Instructions (PDF)  This meeting will also stream live for viewing only on youtube.com/cityofmonterey (10 second delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90-second delay).

PUBLIC COMMENT PROCEDURES AND TIME LIMITS:

The total amount of time allocated for public comment on a particular issue and for each individual speaker is generally as follows:

1. Up to three minutes per speaker.

2. For regular City Council meetings, there are two 15-minute public comment periods, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. Speakers may only comment during one session.

3. The total time allocated for public comment:
a. Items pulled from the consent agenda – 15 minutes each item b. Public Appearance items – 30 minutes each item
c. Public Hearing items – 30 minutes each item
d. Closed session items – 15 minutes each item
At the time an item is considered, the Mayor will ask those attending the meeting in person to line up at the podium or raise their hands, and for remote participants to use *9 on the telephone or the “raise hand” function in Zoom, if they wish to address the City Council. The maximum amount of time for each person to speak and the total amount of time allotted for each item will be determined based on the number of people indicating an interest in speaking and the amount of business to be conducted on the agenda. In exceptional circumstances and when necessary to ensure a full opportunity for public input, the Mayor may, with the legislative body’s consent, adjust the amount of time allowed for public input and/or the time allotted for each speaker.

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt. Code section 84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is 5/21/2024 4:00:00 PM
2 required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $250 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made.
***Afternoon Session Agenda ***
4:00 - 5:30 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER

PRESENTATIONS

1. Recognize National Public Works Week 2024 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

2. Update from California American Water on the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
The public may speak to any item that is not on the agenda and that is in the City of Monterey’s subject matter jurisdiction.

CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under Consent Agenda are routine and will be adopted by one motion unless a member of the City Council or the public requests discussion or a separate vote.

Approval of Minutes

3. May 7, 2024 Regular Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Resolutions
A resolution is an expression of opinion or evidence of a decision made by the City Council and often relates to administrative business of the City. Resolutions generally become effective immediately upon adoption.

4. Award Contract for Animal Sheltering Services (not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under general Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

5. Identify the Rehabilitation of Roberts Avenue as the Project to be Funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

6. Authorize the Appropriation and Expenditure of Funds in the Amount of $29,930.83 to Obtain Permits Required for the Laguna Grande Regional Park Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
5/21/2024 4:00:00 PM
3 7. Public Disclosure of Binding Interest Arbitration Award between the City of Monterey and Monterey Firefighters’ Association (MFFA) Local 3707 Pursuant to City Charter Section

5.4(d) and Implementation Authorization (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Other

8. Authorize the Mayor to Sign a Letter on Behalf of the City Supporting AB 2410 (Wallis) Meal Program: Senior Citizens (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

9. Authorizing a Letter of Support for the Transportation Agency for Monterey County Application to the Active Transportation Program (ATP) for the Fort Ord Regional Trail & Greenway Project in Conjunction with the North Fremont Gap Project and Authorizing a Grant Application and Letter of Intent to be a Partner Agency (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

10. Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 401 Pearl Street (Monterey Tennis Center); Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties:

Montgomery Roth and Richard Snelling (Monterey Waves, LLC); Under Negotiation:

Price and Terms of Payment for Concession Agreement Extension (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) *** End of Consent Agenda ***

PUBLIC HEARING
Public Hearings are held to receive a staff presentation and public comment on certain items prior to City Council action. NOTICE CONCERNING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS: If you challenge the City Council’s zoning, planning, or land use decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing on the matter, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at the time of or prior to the public hearing. (Government Code section 65009.)

11. Levy Assessments to Fund the Cannery Row, New Monterey, and North Fremont Business Improvement Districts (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

REQUESTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS TO AGENDIZE NEW MATTERS
Councilmembers may request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda. The sole issue to be determined is whether the substantive issue warrants being heard at a future date.

A majority vote is not required, instead, the motion will pass with two “yes” votes.

12. Councilmember Haffa and Councilmember Smith’s Request to Agendize a Recommendation to Direct City Staff to Budget for a Traffic Safety Study at the Intersection of Skyline Forest Drive and Highway 68 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378, and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) 5/21/2024 4:00:00 PM
4 13. Councilmember Haffa and Councilmember Smith’s Request to Agendize Consideration of a Request from the Skyline Forest Safety Committee to Authorize Accessing Voter Registration Information for a Survey of Neighborhood Residents on the Safety of the Skyline Forest and Highway 68 Intersection to be Conducted by the Committee (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378, and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
*** Adjourn to Closed Session (See additional agenda) *** The City Council will take public comments on closed session items before convening to closed session.

RECESS

RECONVENE
*** Evening Session Agenda ***
7:00 - 11:00 p.m.

No discussion of a new item will be started after 10:30 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS CONTINUED
Any person who did not offer a general public comment in the afternoon session may speak to any item that is not on the agenda and that is in the City of Monterey’s subject matter jurisdiction.

ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM CLOSED SESSION

PUBLIC APPEARANCE (EVE)
Public Appearance items are on non-routine issues that might stimulate public interest and comments.

14. Approve Selection Committee Recommendation to Issue Storefront Retail Cannabis Business Permits, Contingent Upon Successful Obtainment of a Zone Clearance, to 1) Monterey Responsible and Compliant Retail LLC, 2) Element 7 SF4 LLC, 3) Monterey Pacific Retail Holdings, Inc., and 4) OTC Monterey, LLC; and Establish a Waitlist for the Remaining Four (4) Applicants (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

15. Conduct a Drawing to Identify the Order By Which the Top Four (4) Commercial Cannabis Business Applicants Choose Their Preferred Business Location Zone From the Available Zone(s) (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmembers may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on their activities. In addition, Councilmember or the City Council may provide a referral to staff or other resources for factual information. (Government Code section 54954.2(a)(3).)
5/21/2024 4:00:00 PM
5 CITY MANAGER REPORTS
The City Manager may make a brief report on their activities or a brief announcement. They may also ask for clarification or direction regarding scheduling of Council meetings and study sessions.

ADJOURNMENT
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on these matters within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, are available at: monterey.org/submitted-comments and in the City Manager’s Office at 580 Pacific St., Room 1, Monterey, CA 93940 during regular business hours.

Information distributed to the Council at the Council meeting becomes part of the public record. Members of the public who submit written public comment on an agenda item may be subject to the Levine Act which requires disclosure of campaign contributions of more than $250 to an officer of the City within the preceding 12 months.

CITY OF MONTEREY'S 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES:

Voicemail: (831) 646-3799 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.monterey.gov INTERPRETATION: The Monterey City Council invites and encourages public participation at its meetings. Requests for language interpretation may be made by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 831-646-3935. The City Clerk will make every effort to accommodate requests for interpreter assistance. Requests should be made as soon as possible in advance of any meeting of the City Council. The City is committed to addressing language interpretation requests swiftly in order to maximize public participation.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of Monterey is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected] or (831) 646-3935. Notification 30 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-

35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communicationrelated assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.

Upcoming city meetings are listed at http://isearchmonterey.org More information is available by calling (831) 646-3935 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Sara South, Engineering Programs Analyst
SUBJECT: Recognize National Public Works Week 2024 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive a presentation to recognize National Public Works Week 2024.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

It is within the City Council’s purview to acknowledge the people and services delivered by the City of Monterey by recognizing the contributions of its workforce. National Public Works Week 2024 is an appropriate recognition by the City Council.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 1., Item Page 1, Packet Page 6 №10/24
this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

None.

DISCUSSION:

For National Public Works Week, many states, provinces, cities/towns and municipalities from across North America come together to celebrate with official government proclamations and resolutions in honor of the contribution Public Works makes to their communities: in planning, building, managing and operating the heart of our local communities and in building the quality of life. The American Public Works Association (APWA) announced "Advancing Quality of Life for All" as the theme for the 2024 National Public Works Week.

The Public Works Department builds and maintains the City’s necessary infrastructure, supporting the health and economic vitality of the community, and helping create a great place to live. In the City of Monterey this includes our many divisions from engineering, construction management, environmental regulations, parking, general services, streets & utilities, harbor, and fleet services.

The City of Monterey’s largest department is the Public Works Department, comprised of six divisions working together to support the City’s infrastructure system:

Engineering, Construction Management, and Environmental Division This division provides engineering management of the public right-of-way, traffic engineering, civil engineering, administration of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Neighborhood Capital Improvement Program (NCIP) and projects assigned by the U.S. Army through the Intergovernmental Services Agreement (IGSA). The Division works with other agencies, utility providers, residents, project stakeholders, and other City departments, to ensure that information is coordinated in a smooth and timely fashion.

Parking
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 1., Item Page 2, Packet Page 7 №10/24
This division operates 31 parking facilities with approximately 3,500 off-street parking spaces. In addition to off-street parking spaces, there are over 3,000 on-street spaces in the Downtown, Cannery Row and Lighthouse areas of the City. The Parking Division works with businesses, residents, institutions and visitors alike to meet parking needs.

General Services
The General Services Division of the City of Monterey provides building maintenance and custodial services for all City buildings and facilities through cost effective repair, renovation and routine maintenance. The General Services Division also provides these same services to military partners. Monterey is proud to celebrate nearly 25 years of partnership with its military partners!

Street & Utilities
The mission of the Streets Division is to maintain the City of Monterey’s roadways, sanitary sewers, storm drains, signage, traffic signals, and related infrastructure. The Streets Division maintains 101 centerline miles of roadway, 104 miles of sanitary sewer, 43 miles of storm drain culverts, over 5,000 regulatory signs, and 56 signalized intersections. Streets crews are on standby, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year to respond to sanitary sewer overflows, vehicle accidents where City infrastructure is damaged, and to support public safety.

Harbor
This division provides access to a variety of recreational, as well as commercial opportunities for residents and visitors alike in a scenic setting, and continues to improve services and infrastructure, allowing for even greater access to the area for fishing or leisure purposes.

Fleet Services
The Fleet Division of the Public Works Department is a fully functional, modern vehicle and equipment repair facility with certified technicians and up-to-date equipment. The mission of the Fleet Services Department is to provide for the maintenance of City owned vehicles and equipment. The department supports the City Council’s priorities related to associated costs of ownership of all vehicles and equipment. This equipment is used in the everyday support of City Employees in performance of their duties to help promote a high quality of life for City residents.

The American Public Works Association (APWA) announced "Advancing Quality of Life for All" as the theme for the 2024 National Public Works Week.

An oral report will be presented at the meeting.

AR/ss
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 1., Item Page 3, Packet Page 8 Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 1., Item Page 4, Packet Page 9 Council
Agenda Report
№09/24
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Update from California American Water on the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive a presentation from California American Water to update the public on their Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Champion regional and local efforts to secure adequate, affordable, and sustainable water sources for the city, now and into the future.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

It is within the City Council’s purview to receive updates from utility providers such as California American Water on projects such as their Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There is no fiscal impact to receiving this presentation.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose not to receive this presentation, but that is not recommended.

Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 2.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 1, Packet Page 10 DISCUSSION:

California American Water (Cal Am), a division of American Water Works Company, Inc., is the privately-owned water utility serving the majority of the City of Monterey and the Monterey Peninsula. At its meeting on May 21, 2024, staff from Cal Am will deliver a presentation to the Monterey City Council on its Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 2., Item Page 2, Packet Page 11

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

CITY OF MONTEREY
Tuesday, May 7, 2024
4:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER, 580 PACIFIC ST.

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Councilmembers

Present: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson

Absent: None
City Staff

Present:

City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, Finance Director, Fire Chief, Parks and Recreation Director, Public Works Director, City Clerk, Property Manager, Police Lieutenant, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer, Police Lieutenant, Senior Engineer, Planning Manager, Housing Manager, Assistant Human Resources Director, Management Analyst (Recreation), Division Chief, Acting Assistant Fire Chief, Fire Captain
***Afternoon Session Agenda ***

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Williamson called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. City Clerk Klein called the roll with the Council present as indicated above.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Haffa led the Pledge.

PRESENTATIONS

1. Report on 2-1-1 Monterey County by Katy Castagna, President and CEO, United Way Monterey County (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Received presentation
Katy Castagna, of United Way Monterey County, gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from: Lorna Moffat, who expressed concerns about the responsiveness of 2-1-1 and said more funding was needed; Esther Malkin, who spoke in support of the United Way and the 2-1-1 program and thanked them for their Real Cost Measure report; and Kent Glenzer, of Gathering for Women, who stressed that the homeless issue in the area was growing and thanked United Way and the City for their work to address the challenge.

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Based on the number of individuals requesting to speak, Mayor Williamson reduced the speaking time per person to two minutes for general public comments. Public comment on nonagendized matters was received from: Steve Lightfoot; Karen Brown; Rudy Rosales; Joni Caldwell; Ann Jacobson; P. K. Diffenbaugh, of the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District; Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 3.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 1, Packet Page 12 City Council Minutes May 7, 2024
2 Lorna Moffat; Robin Fishman; Ana Muñoz; Jean Rasch; Philip Laverty; Nina Beety; and Bryan Rosen.

CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Williamson said that Items 8, 13, 14, and 15 would be pulled from Consent based on requests from the public. Councilmember Smith said he would vote "no" on Item 7.

Public comment on the Consent Items was not received.

On a motion by Councilmember Haffa, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following vote, the City Council approved the CONSENT AGENDA, except Items 8, 13, 14, and 15, with a "no" vote from Councilmember Smith on Item 7:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Approval of Minutes

2. April 16, 2024 Regular Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Action: Approved

3. April 24, 2024 Special Meeting (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Action: Approved
Award of Construction Contracts

4. Authorizing a Transfer from the Measure P/S – ADA CIP Account in the Amount of $2,500,000 to the Measure P/S - Pavement CIP Account and Awarding a Construction Contract in the Amount of $694,820 to Coastal Paving & Excavating, Inc. for the Citywide Road Rehabilitation Project, Phase 6 (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***SB1& Meas P/S***
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-054 C.S.

5. Awarding General Municipal Building Improvements Job Order Contract 2024 for City Projects in the Amount of $1,000,000 to Pueblo Construction, Inc., $1,000,000 to Comercial Solutions Group Inc., and $1,000,000 to David Construction & Management, Inc. (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) ***CIP***
Action: Adopted Resolution Nos. 24-055, 24-056, and 24-057 C.S.

6. Awarding General Municipal Building Improvements Job Order Contract 2024 for Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA) Projects in the Amount of $1,000,000 to Pueblo Construction Inc., $1,000,000 to David Construction & Management, Inc., and $1,000,000 to Newton Construction & Management, Inc. ***IGSA*** (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (b)(1).); Categorical Excluded (CX) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations 32 CFR 651, Appendix B, CX(e)(1); CEQA Not a Project).

Action: Adopted Resolution Nos. 24-058, 24-059, and 24-060 C.S.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 2, Packet Page 13 City Council Minutes May 7, 2024
3 Ordinances

7. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance to Amend Chapter 30, Article 4, Sewer Service Fee, to Authorize Collection on the County of Monterey Tax Roll and Authorize a Fee Collection and Indemnification Agreement with Monterey One Water and/or the County of Monterey for this Purpose (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 3684 C.S. (4-1, Councilmember Smith voting no) Resolutions

8. Authorize an Appropriation of $87,985.36 and Approve the Purchase of Four (4) Police Interceptor Upfitting Packages from LEHR EVS (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Pulled from Consent; Adopted Resolution No. 24-061 C.S.

Public comment was received from Stan Williams, who expressed concern about the percentage of the City budget allocated to public safety.

The Council briefly expressed its commitment to supporting City staff's ability to work productively to provide for public safety.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-061 C.S. authorizing an Appropriation of $87,985.36 and Approve the Purchase of Four (4) Police Interceptor Upfitting Packages from LEHR EVS:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

9. Authorize Purchase of a Negotiations Operations Center Vehicle for use by the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit using Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Program Grant Funds in the Amount of $195,906. (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-062 C.S.

10. Adopt a Resolution to Allocate Funding for the Special Event Support Program (SESP) and Authorize the City Manager to Enter into Funding Agreements (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-063 C.S.

11. Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Contract Accepting a Grant of Medical Equipment from the Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula (Not a project under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-064 C.S.

12. Adopt the Annual Reports and Approve Resolutions to Set a Public Hearing Date to Levy the Annual Assessment for the Cannery Row Business Improvement District, the New Monterey Business Improvement District, and the North Fremont Business Improvement District (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution Nos. 24-065, 24-066, and 24-067 C.S.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 3, Packet Page 14 City Council Minutes May 7, 2024
4 13. Award Two Tree Maintenance Job Order Contracts 2024 for City Projects in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,000,000 Each to West Coast Arborists, Inc, and to Tope’s Tree Service, Inc. (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15304, Class 4)
Action: Pulled from Consent; Adopted Resolution Nos. 24-068 and 24-069 C.S.

Public comment was received from Lorna Moffat, Nina Beety, and Bryan Rosen, who all expressed concern about removal of trees and urged the Council to save trees in Monterey.

On question from the Council, City Manager Uslar said that the City arborists and contractors were very cautious and focused on tree preservation. He said that the proposed contracts would maintain trees to keep the forests healthy.

The Council briefly reminded the public that the City was a designated Tree City by the Arbor Day Foundation. It was stated that the City had many trees and that trees were only removed when necessary.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Haffa, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 24-068 and 24-069 C.S. awarding Two Tree Maintenance Job Order Contracts 2024 for City Projects in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,000,000 Each to West Coast Arborists, Inc, and to Tope’s Tree Service, Inc.:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

14. Award Two Tree Maintenance Job Order Contracts 2024 for Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA) Projects in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,000,000 Each to West Coast Arborists, Inc, and to Tope’s Tree Service, Inc. ***IGSA*** (Categorical Exclusion under NEPA and Army implementing regulations 32 CFR 651, Appendix B, CX(e)(1); CEQA, Not a project) Action: Pulled from Consent; Adopted Resolution Nos. 24-070 and 24-071 C.S.

Public comment was received from Lorna Moffat, Nina Beety, and Bryan Rosen, who all spoke against the item and criticized the City's actions relating to trees.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 24-070 and 24-071 C.S. awarding Two Tree Maintenance Job Order Contracts 2024 for IGSA Projects in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,000,000 Each to West Coast Arborists, Inc, and to Tope’s Tree Service, Inc. ***IGSA***:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

15. Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus for One (1) Type 1 Replacement Fire Engine at a Cost Not to Exceed $980,439 for this Purchase and Utilize Financing via the Banc of America Public Capital Corporation Master Equipment Lease Agreement for this Purchase (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Pulled from Consent; Adopted Resolution No. 24-072 C.S.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 4, Packet Page 15 City Council Minutes May 7, 2024
5 Public comment was received from Stan Williams, who suggested postponing the matter for a year and stated that the funding required for the fire apparatus would be well used for matters such as housing, food access, and fire prevention.

The Council briefly noted that the Fire Department had been utilizing aging equipment for some time, and stated that the department needed the basic equipment required to carry out the expected public safety programs in the City. It was noted that it typically took years for the City to receive a fire apparatus once purchased.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-072 C.S. authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Agreement with Golden State Fire Apparatus for One (1) Type 1 Replacement Fire Engine at a Cost Not to Exceed $980,439 for this Purchase and Utilize Financing via the Banc of America Public Capital Corporation Master Equipment Lease Agreement for this Purchase:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

16. Authorize a Ten-Year Agreement with Monterey-Salinas Transit District (MST) for the MST Trolley Service to Include Trolley Vehicle Replacement (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-073 C.S.

Other

17. Recognize May 2024 as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Recognized May 2024 as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month

18. Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 1608 Private Bolio Road (Child Development Center); Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Scott Ellis (United States Department of the Army); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for New Lease Agreement (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Appointed Agency Real Property Negotiators Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete *** End of Consent Agenda ***

PUBLIC HEARING

19. Recommend that the City Council Adopt the 2024/2025 Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant Funds and Authorize Submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (Exempt from NEPA per 24 CFR Part 58 and from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1, 15306, Class 6 and 15326, Class 26) Action: Held public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 24-074 C.S., and directed City staff to report back to the Council about the eventual funding to public service agencies after final budgeting information became known
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 5, Packet Page 16 City Council Minutes May 7, 2024
6 Housing Manager Wyatt gave the staff presentation.

Public comment was received from Thomas Lamphere, of Veterans' Transition Center, who thanked the City for its support and spoke about the importance and impact of solar panels for homeless veterans and the community, and Lynn Young, of Josephine Kernes Memorial Pool, who thanked the City for its support and spoke about the organization and the importance of independence for people with disabilities.

On question from the Council, Housing Manager Wyatt said that funding to grantees would be reduced evenly as necessary based on the award from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"). She explained the process by which City staff had conducted outreach to organizations about the opportunity.

The Council expressed apprecation for the work that had gone into preparing the Annual Action Plan.

On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-074 C.S. adopting the 2024/2025 Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant Funds and Authorize Submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; and directed City staff to report back to the Council about the eventual funding to public service agencies after final budgeting information became known:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Haffa summarized two requests to agendize that he said he would bring forward relating to safety at the Highway 68/Skyline Forest Drive intersection.

Councilmember Barber said she would bring forward requests to agendize two topics: honoring indigenous people from the Dutra Street village as requested during general public comments, and an update on North Fremont Street undergrounding.

Mayor Williamson reminded the Council of the Council's Governance Policy and its provisions for individual Councilmembers’ requests to agendize matters.

CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Uslar said that there would be a science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics ("S. T. E. A. M.") event for children at Montecito Park on Saturday, May 11. *** Adjourn to Closed Session (See additional agenda) *** Public comment on the closed session was received from Michael Ungaro, of San Pedro Fish Market, who introduced members of his family and business and expressed hope that the Council would approve the price and terms of payment for a lease agreement (closed session Item cs3).

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 6, Packet Page 17 City Council Minutes May 7, 2024
7 The Council adjourned to closed session at 6:03 p.m.

REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
cs1. Conference with Agency Labor Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 for Labor Negotiations; Agency Negotiators: Brette Neal, Gina Russo; Employee Organizations: General Employees of Monterey (GEM), Management Employees' Association (MEA), Monterey Police Association (MPA), Police Lieutenants' Management Association (PLMA), Monterey Fire Fighters' Association (MFFA), Monterey Fire Chief Officers' Association (MFCOA), Monterey Executive Management Employees' Association (MEMEA) (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: No reportable action taken
cs2. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1), Impartial Arbitration to Resolve Impasse with Monterey Fire Fighter Association pursuant to City Charter Section 5.4 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: No reportable action taken
cs3. Closed Session Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: 30 Fisherman’s Wharf
Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete
Negotiating Parties: Michael Ungaro (San Pedro Fish Market Company, LLC) Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for New Lease Agreement (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: On a unanimous roll call vote, the Council gave confidential direction to real property negotiators
cs 4. Closed Session Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: 1608 Private Bolio Road (Child Development Center) Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete
Negotiating Parties: Scott Ellis (United States Department of the Army) Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for New Lease Agreement (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061 Action: On a unanimous roll call vote, the Council authorized City staff to send notice of non-renewal of the lease

ADJOURNMENT
The Council adjourned at 7:26 p.m.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 7, Packet Page 18 City Council Minutes May 7, 2024
4 Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Clementine Bonner Klein Tyller Williamson
City Clerk Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 3., Item Page 8, Packet Page 19 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Chief of Police David J. Hober
Prepared By: Senior Administrative Analyst Karen Faurot SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to Enter into a Contract with the SPCA Monterey County (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the city manager to enter into a contract with SPCA Monterey County (SPCA).

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City of Monterey and the SPCA Monterey County have worked in partnership for many years to ensure the health and safety of our animal population. This represents no change in policy.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: Yes.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The SPCA proposed contract rate for FY25 increases the flat rate for the initial five-day holding period from the current rate of $184.00 per animal to $245.00 for each dog or cat and $150.00 for small animals. The annual quantities listed in the table below may change depending on need. The additional costs due to the fee increases have been included in the Police Department’s requested FY 2025 budget.

The Police Department followed City Purchasing Policy guidelines to sole source this purchase, and the Finance Department approved the sole source on April 18, 2024.

Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 4.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 1, Packet Page 20 №10/24

Description

Approximate
Annual
Quantity

Unit Price
FY2025

Unit Price
FY2026

Unit Price
FY2027
Cost for initial 5-day
holding period per animal
(dogs and cats)

320

$245.00

$260.00

$275.00
Cost for initial 5-day
holding period per animal
(small animals)
24 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00
Protective custody cost per
day after 5 days in custody
(number of days)

30 $30.00

$30.00

$30.00
Carcass disposal under 5
lbs.

5 $6.49

$6.49

$6.49
Carcass disposal 5 lbs. to
200 lbs.

5 $28.12

$28.12

$28.12
Assistance after business
hours (# of instances)

5 $25.00

$25.00

Total Annual Cost

$83,198

$87,998

$92,798
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City could provide its own animal sheltering service; however, that is not recommended because a City shelter alternative would require a new, larger facility, and additional staff.

DISCUSSION:

SPCA for Monterey County has existed since 1905 and has provided animal sheltering services for various jurisdictions in Monterey County since the 1970s. These services include animal housing for a variety of domestic, exotic, wildlife and livestock species; spay/neuter and Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 2, Packet Page 21 №10/24
veterinary services; adoption services, low-cost vaccinations; and licensing in accordance with each jurisdiction’s protocols. SPCA has been recognized and awarded for excellence by the Nonprofit Alliance of Monterey County, the American Red Cross, the Monterey County Weekly, Carmel Pine Cone, Monterey Herald, and the Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce.

On July 1, 2001, the City of Monterey and SPCA for Monterey County entered into a sheltering service agreement. In general, the work consisted of providing humane sheltering, impoundment and disposition of non-human vertebrates, including stray and unwanted animals.

This relationship has been ongoing and the current contract terminates June 30, 2024. The proposed agreement will remain in effect for three (3) years and will be renewable for two (2) additional years.

The City of Monterey has been very fortunate to partner with SPCA Monterey County to accomplish the difficult task of quality pet management. Staff requests that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with SPCA Monterey County to continue this partnership.

DJH/kf
Attachments: 1. Resolution
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 3, Packet Page 22 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A

CONTRACT WITH SPCA MONTEREY COUNTY
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey is required by state law to provide for the capture, impoundment, sheltering and disposition of animals; and WHEREAS, SPCA for Monterey County owns and operates an animal shelter and represents itself as being willing and able to provide the services required by the City and to carry out the provisions of the aforesaid statutes and City Codes pertaining to the shelter, impoundment, humane care and disposition of stray and unwanted animals covered by said statutes, rules, ordinances, judicial orders and codes; and WHEREAS, contracting for animal sheltering services increases the efficiency and management of animal services in the City of Monterey; and WHEREAS, sufficient funding to award the contract is available with the Police budget; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 4, Packet Page 23

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby awards SPCA Monterey County an animal sheltering service contract, and authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to enter into an agreement for animal sheltering services for three (3) years and will be renewable for two (2) additional years.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 4., Item Page 5, Packet Page 24 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Sara South, Engineering Programs Analyst
SUBJECT: Identify the Rehabilitation of Roberts Avenue as the Project to be Funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Rehabilitation of Roberts Avenue to be funded with revenues from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act.

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This Project is consistent with the City Council’s Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities of Quality of Life – “Respond effectively to neighborhood concerns,” Fiscal Stewardship – “Prioritize funding models and sources for facility rehabilitation, repair, and replacement,” and Active Mobility – “Maintain and repair core street, roadway, and storm drain infrastructure.” CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB 1 Beall) provides for the allocations of various funds to state and local agencies for transportation purposes. Among those funds are formula-based allocations from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA).

The City of Monterey is projected to receive RMRA funds in the amount of $728,358 for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 1, Packet Page 25 №10/24
on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could choose not to approve Roberts Avenue as the project to be funded by SB 1; however, this is not recommended. Based on the City’s Pavement Management System, the reconstruction of the identified street segment of Roberts Avenue is a high-priority, costeffective project that meets the City’s priorities for transportation investment.

DISCUSSION:

Cities and counties own and operate more than 81 percent of streets and roads in California, and from the moment we open our front door to drive to work, bike to school, or walk to a bus station, people are dependent upon a safe, reliable local transportation network. Police, fire, and emergency medical services all need safe reliable roads to react quickly to emergency calls.

Maintaining and preserving the local street and road system in good condition will reduce drive times and traffic congestion, improve bicycle safety, and make the pedestrian experience safer and more appealing, which leads to reduced vehicle emissions helping the State achieve its air quality and greenhouse gas emissions reductions goals. Restoring roads before they fail also reduces construction time which results in less air pollution from heavy equipment and less water pollution from site run-off.

Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide. SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Monterey are aware of the projects proposed for funding in the community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year.

The City must include a list of all projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement. The street segments are identified based on the City’s Pavement Management System.

Based on the City’s Pavement Management System, the Rehabilitation of Roberts Avenue, which includes, but is not limited to, the removal and replacement of asphalt, is a high-priority and cost-effective project that also meets the City’s priorities for transportation investment. This project proposes stabilizing the slope along Roberts Avenue. Sidewalk and pavement failures are an indication that the slope needs to be stabilized. The estimated $728,358 in RMRA funding will be budgeted towards the completion of the project, which is estimated to begin construction in 2025. The repairs will have an estimated useful life of 20 years.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 2, Packet Page 26 №10/24
City Council will separately budget HUTA (Gas Tax) funds as part of the FY2024-25 CIP Budget for this project; however, SB 1 requires a specific Council action to identify where the RMRA funds will be utilized.

Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Rehabilitation of Roberts Avenue, to be funded by SB 1: The Road Repair and Accountability Act.

AR/ss
Attachments: 1. Resolution
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 3, Packet Page 27 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

IDENTIFYING THE REHABILITATION OF ROBERTS AVENUE AS THE PROJECT TO BE FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide;
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Monterey are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; WHEREAS, the City must include a list of all projects proposed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1 which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; WHEREAS, the City will receive an estimated $728,358 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2024-25 from SB 1;
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community priorities for transportation investment; WHEREAS, if the Legislature and Governor failed to act, city streets and county roads would have continued to deteriorate, having many and varied negative impacts on our community;
WHEREAS, cities and counties own and operate more than 81 percent of streets and roads in California, and from the moment we open our front door to drive to work, bike to school, or walk to the bus station, people are dependent upon a safe, reliable local transportation network;
WHEREAS, police, fire, and emergency medical services all need safe reliable roads to react quickly to emergency calls;
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 4, Packet Page 28 WHEREAS, maintaining and preserving the local street and road system in good condition will reduce drive times and traffic congestion, improve bicycle safety, and make the pedestrian experience safer and more appealing, which leads to reduce vehicle emissions helping the State achieve its air quality and greenhouse gas emissions reductions goals; WHEREAS, restoring roads before they fail also reduces construction time which results in less air pollution from heavy equipment and less water pollution from site run-off; WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide;
WHEREAS, based on the City’s Pavement Management System, Rehabilitation of Roberts Avenue is the highest priority and cost-effective project that also meets the City’s priorities for transportation investment. The estimated $728,358 in RMRA funding will be budgeted towards the completion of the project, which is estimated to begin construction in early 2025. The repairs include but are not limited to the removal and replacement of asphalt and will have an estimated useful life of 20 years; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 5, Packet Page 29

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby identifies the following project to be funded with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues:
 Rehabilitation of Roberts Avenue; Estimated Useful Life: 20 years; Anticipated Year of Construction: 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 5., Item Page 6, Packet Page 30 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Karen Larson, Parks and Recreation Director
Prepared By: Louie Marcuzzo, Park Operations Manager
SUBJECT: Authorize the Appropriation and Expenditure of Funds in the Amount of $29,930.83 to Obtain Permits Required for the Laguna Grande Regional Park Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy (Adopted Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council authorize the appropriation and expenditure of funds in the amount of $29,930.83 to obtain permits for the Laguna Grande Regional Park Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy. Payments will be made to the City of Seaside on behalf of the Laguna Grante Joint Powers Authority (JPA) to Bellinger Foster Steinmetz (BFS) to complete an environmental study. The payment amounts are $20,000 in FY24 and $9,930.83 in FY25.

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The project supports a collaborative, regional effort to maintain Laguna Grande Regional Park.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: Yes, as to the contract with BFS.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The permitting costs for the work identified in the project for the Laguna Grande Regional Park Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy are $89,792.50 and will be divided equally between the JPA member agencies, with each paying $29,930.83. As the lead agency for the permitting process, the payment to the City of Seaside will be made in two or more installments. For FY24, $20,000.00 was already appropriated and approved in the FY24 budget. For FY25, $10,000.00 in remaining permitting costs will be proposed. Appropriated funds will be assigned to the Parks ‘Special Projects’ account (101-500-5210-0000-4285).

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was posted according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15072 and a Draft Initial Study and Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 6.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 1, Packet Page 31 №10/24
Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) were circulated for public review for the required 30 day public review period, from January 18, 2023, to February 17, 2023 (CEQA Section 15073), during which time all related documents were made available at the Monterey City Hall Planning Office and on the City’s website. No comment letters were received during the public review period.

The IS/MND identifies that the project could result in potentially significant environmental impacts associated with air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, tribal cultural resources, and mandatory findings of significance. Mitigation Measures have been required that will reduce the potential impacts to a less-than-significant level.

Further, the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated with the Draft Initial Study. The Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Agency, at a properly noticed public hearing on March 30, 2023, carefully considered all of the information presented to it, including the agenda report and information submitted at the public hearing by interested persons; and adopted the Laguna Grande Regional Park Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Subsequently, the City of Monterey, as a responsible agency for the project, adopted the IS/MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program on June 6, 2023 (City Council Resolution 23-056 C.S.; SCH:2023010318).

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council may deny the request, but this is not recommended as it could delay the permitting process and project progress.

DISCUSSION:

The Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Agency (JPA) includes the City of Monterey, City of Seaside, and Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District (MPRPD). On April 21, 2021, the JPA approved a contract with Bellinger Foster Steinmetz (BFS) to create a Laguna Grande Regional Park Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy and conduct environmental review for Laguna Grande Regional Park. Prior to the award of the contract, staff from the member agencies determined that there was inadequate funding to pay for a full park plan but recommended moving forward with the Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy. To prevent further project delays, the Monterey City Council adopted Resolution 22-166 in December 2022 to pay for the cost increase of $18,600 but retroactively requested the other JPA agencies to pay for their share of the costs (one-third per agency). The City of Seaside and MPRPD paid the City for their share of those costs.

After the Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy was completed, the JPA agency leaders met and agreed that the City of Seaside would be the lead agency for the permitting process for the Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy.

On February 12, 2024, the JPA Board approved an amendment to the contract with BFS to include obtaining the necessary permits required to start the work identified in the project, authorizing the contract value to be increased by $89,792.50, and authorizing the City of Seaside to collect the funds from the member agencies.

On March 7, 2024, the City of Seaside also approved an amendment to the professional services agreement with BFS to include obtaining the necessary permits for the Trail Maintenance and Vegetation Strategy on behalf of the Laguna Grande JPA, increasing the Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 2, Packet Page 32 №10/24
value of the contract value increase of $89,792.50 to be funded equally by JPA agency members at $29,930.83 each. The resolution also authorized the Seaside City Manager to execute the agreement and the City of Seaside to collect funds from the member agencies, including the City of Monterey, to pay the consultant on behalf of the JPA as payments are due.

In conclusion, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the appropriation of funds in the amount of $29,930.83 to supplement the budget for the Laguna Grande Regional Park Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy permitting and to issue payments to the City of Seaside in the amount of $20,000 in FY24 and $9,930.83 in FY25.

KL/sg
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Attachment 1: Resolution 22-166

3. Attachment 2: City of Seaside Resolution 24-17
e: Rafael Payan, General Manager, Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District Dan Meewis, Recreation Director, City of Seaside
Laguna Grande Neighborhood Association
Beth Matz, BFS Landscape Architects
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 3, Packet Page 33 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION AND EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,930.83 TO OBTAIN THE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE LAGUNA GRANDE

REGIONAL PARK TRAIL AND VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STRATEGY WHEREAS, the existing Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Power Agency (JPA) desired to create a trail and vegetation maintenance strategy; WHEREAS, after a competitive RFP process, the JPA selected BFS Landscape Architects to perform the work;
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2024 the JPA Board approved an amendment to the contract with BFS to include obtaining the necessary permits required to start the work identified in the project, authorizing the contract value to be increased by $89,792.50, and authorizing the City of Seaside to collect the funds from the member agencies; WHEREAS, on March 7, 2024, the City of Seaside also approved an amendment to the professional services agreement with BFS to include obtaining the necessary permits for the Trail Maintenance and Vegetation Strategy on behalf of the Laguna Grande JPA, increasing the value of the contract value increase of $89,792.50 to be funded equally by JPA agency members at $29,930.83 each. The resolution also authorized the Seaside City Manager to execute the agreement and the City of Seaside to collect funds from the member agencies, including the City of Monterey, to pay the consultant on behalf of the JPA as payments are due; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was posted according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15072 and a Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) were circulated for public review for the required 30 day public review period, from January 18, 2023, to February 17, 2023 (CEQA Section 15073), during which time all related documents were made available at the Monterey City Hall Planning Office and on the City’s website. No comment letters were received during the public review period.

Further, the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated with the Draft Initial Study. The Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Agency, at a properly noticed public hearing on March 30, 2023, carefully considered all of the information presented to it, including the agenda report and information submitted at the public hearing by interested persons; and adopted the Laguna Grande Regional Park Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Subsequently, the City of Monterey, as a responsible agency for the project, adopted the IS/MND and Mitigation Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 4, Packet Page 34 Monitoring and Reporting Program on June 6, 2023 (City Council Resolution 23-056 C.S.; SCH:2023010318).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Authorizes the appropriation of funds in the amount of $29,930.83 to obtain the necessary permits for the Laguna Grande Regional Park Trail and Vegetation Maintenance Strategy.

2. Authorizes the Finance Director to issue payments to the City of Seaside for the Bellinger Foster Steinmetz (BFS) contract. The payment amounts are $20,000 in FY24 and $9,930.83 in FY25 (expenditure account 101-500-5210-0000-4285).

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 5, Packet Page 35 RESOLUTION NO. 22-166 C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,600 TO

SUPPLEMENT THE BUDGET FOR THE LAGUNA GRANDE REGIONAL TRAIL

MAINTENANCE STRATEGY AND CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FROM THE

PLANNING OFFICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUDGET AND AMEND THE CONTRACT

AND ISSUE PAYMENT TO BFS UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK
WHEREAS, the existing Laguna Grande Regional Park Joint Powers Agency desired to create a trail maintenance strategy and conduct environmental review of this proposal; WHEREAS, after a competitive RFP process, the JPA selected BFS Landscape Architects to perform the work. The cost of the work was $109,965 and it was funded with member agencies contributing as follows: the City of Monterey contributed $24,982.50, the City of Seaside contributed $24,982.50, and the Monterey Regional Park District contributed $60,000;
WHEREAS, the JPA adopted Resolution 2021-01 awarding the contract to BFS Landscape Architects and authorizing the City of Monterey to collect payment from JPA member entities and to issue payment to BFS Landscape Architects when payment is due; WHEREAS, the Trail Maintenance Strategy and environmental review is almost completed. The project scope needed to be amended due to discrepancies in the park boundary that require additional modifications to both the strategy and environmental document; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council authorizes:

1. Increase the appropriation by $18,600 to supplement the budget for the Laguna Grande Regional Park Trail Maintenance Strategy and Environmental Review from the Planning Office Professional Services Budget (expenditure account 101-400-

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 6, Packet Page 36 2 4400-0000-4240) and amend the contract and issue payment to BFS upon completion of work;

2. The Finance Director to issue payment to BFS Landscape Architects in the amount of $18,600 when payment is due.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this 20th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 7, Packet Page 37 ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 8, Packet Page 38 ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 6., Item Page 9, Packet Page 39 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Brette Neal, Human Resources Director
Prepared By: Gina Russo, Assistant Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Public Disclosure of Binding Interest Arbitration Award between the City of Monterey and Monterey Firefighters’ Association (MFFA) Local 3707 Pursuant to City Charter Section 5.4(d) and Implementation Authorization (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution implementing the Interest Arbitration Award between the City and Monterey Firefighters’ Association (MFFA) Local 3707.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Provide sufficient resources and support to develop, retain, and recruit a high-quality city workforce.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) of 1968 established collective bargaining for California’s municipal, county and local special district employers and employees. Under MMBA, the governing body of a public agency is required to meet and confer over wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. The City of Monterey Charter, Article 5, Section 4 sets forth impasse resolution procedures if after good faith negotiations, disputes or controversies pertaining to wages, hours, or terms and conditions of employment remain unresolved.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The City set aside an adequate amount of funding to pay for the 4% wage increases effective July 1, 2022 and July 1, 2023 respectively from the General Fund’s unassigned fund balance.

The estimated amount of retroactive payment for Year One (July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023) is $480,000. The estimated amount of retroactive payment for Year Two (July 1, 2023 – May 15, 2024) is $850,000. The total amount of retroactive wage increases is approximately $1,330,000.

The rate increase will be implemented immediately following the Public Disclosure of Binding Interest Arbitration Award and will be included with the pay period beginning May 16, 2024. The

2.5% Education Incentive Pay, the 2.5% Certification Pay, and the 5% Bilingual Pay will be implemented on the first pay period following receipt of the list of eligible MFFA members.

Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 7.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 1, Packet Page 40 №10/24
All retroactive payments will be processed as soon as administratively possible, but no more than 60 days. Retroactive payments will include payments for Incentives dating back to May 11, 2024 along with the Wage Increases noted above.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

No alternatives are available as this decision is binding.

DISCUSSION:

Labor relations rules require parties to meet and confer in good faith to the point of impasse.

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and MFFA expired on June 30, 2022. After meeting and conferring in good faith, MFFA declared an impasse on March 7, 2023.

The City of Monterey Charter, Article 5, Section 4 sets forth impasse resolution procedures that include a binding decision by a mutually selected neutral Arbitrator.

The City and MFFA Local 3707 received the award on April 26, 2024 which allowed for the following:
 Wage increase of four percent (4%) retroactive to July 1, 2022  Wage increase of four percent (4%) retroactive to July 1, 2023  Certification Pay of two and a half percent (2.5%) for possessing a California State Company Officer Certification effective following implementation of the Board’s decision (May 11, 2024)
 Education Incentive Pay of two and half percent (2.5%) for possessing an associate degree or sixty (60) units of college credit effective following implementation of the Board’s decision (May 11, 2024)
 Bilingual Pay of 5% of their base monthly salary effective following implementation of the Board’s decision (May 11, 2024)
 Tuition Reimbursement of $2,000 per employee per fiscal year effective following implementation of the Board’s decision (May 11, 2024)
BK/gr
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 2, Packet Page 41 №10/24
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Arbitration Award
e: Christine Davi, City Attorney
Rafaela King, Finance Director
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 3, Packet Page 42 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

PROVIDING PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF BINDING INTEREST ARBITRATION AWARD BETWEEN THE CITY AND MONTEREY FIREFIGHTERS’ ASSOCIATION (MFFA) LOCAL 3707 PURSUANT TO CITY CHARTER SECTION 5.4(d) AND IMPLEMENTATION

AUTHORIZATION
WHEREAS, the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Monterey Firefighters’ Association (MFFA) expired on June 30, 2022; WHEREAS, the City and the Monterey Firefighters’ Association (MFFA) met and conferred in good faith;
WHEREAS, the Monterey Firefighters’ Association (MFFA) declared impasse on March 7, 2023.

WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Charter, Article 5, Section 4 sets forth impasse resolutions procedures;
WHEREAS, The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby adopts a resolution implementing the Interest Arbitration Award as follows:

1. Wage increase of four percent (4%) retroactive to July 1, 2022

2. Wage increase of four percent (4%) retroactive to July 1, 2023

3. Certification Pay of two and a half percent (2.5%) for possessing a California State Company Officer Certification effective following implementation of the Board’s decision (May 11, 2024)

4. Education Incentive Pay of two and half percent (2.5%) for possessing an associate degree or sixty (60) units of college credit effective following implementation of the Board’s decision (May 11, 2024)
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 4, Packet Page 43

5. Bilingual Pay of 5% of their base monthly salary effective following implementation of the Board’s decision (May 11, 2024)

6. Tuition Reimbursement of $2,000 per employee per fiscal year effective following implementation of the Board’s decision (May 11, 2024)

7. The rate increase will be implemented immediately and will be included with the pay period beginning May 16, 2024

8. The 2.5% Education Incentive Pay, the 2.5% Certification Pay, and the 5% Bilingual Pay will be implemented on the first pay period following receipt of the list of eligible MFFA members.

9. All retroactive payments will be processed as soon as administratively possible, but no more than 60 days from adoption of this resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 5, Packet Page 44 PURSUANT TO CITY OF MONTEREY CHARTER SECTION 5.4
Impartial Arbitration for Fire and Police Department Employee Disputes In the Matter of an Interest Arbitration
Between

CITY OF MONTEREY,
and

MONTEREY FIRE FIGHTERS
ASSOCIATION (MFFA) LOCAL 3707

ARBITRATION AWARD
For the City: Che I. Johnson, Esq.

Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
5250 North Palm Ave, Suite 310
Fresno, CA 93704
For the Association: Stuart D. Adams, Esq.

Adams Legal Group
28241 Crown Valley Parkway
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Arbitration Board
Neutral Member: David A. Weinberg
Arbitration Mediation and Conflict Resolution
Association Member: Janelle F. Crandall, Esq.

City Member: Richard S. Whitmore, Esq.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 6, Packet Page 45 2 BACKGROUND
In accordance with the Impasse Resolution Procedures stated in Charter Section 5.4, the parties selected David A. Weinberg as the Neutral Chairperson of the Board of Arbitration. Richard Whitmore was selected by the City of Monterey (hereinafter “City”) to be its Arbitration Board Member, and Janelle Crandall. was selected by the Monterey Firefighters Association (hereinafter “Association”) to be its Arbitration Board Member.

The Arbitration Board held hearings in the City of Monterey on December 11, December 12, December 13, and December 14, 2023. After mediation and discussion, the parties reached agreement on a number of issues, which are no longer at impasse. The Chairperson directed the parties to submit their last offer of settlement on each remaining issue still in dispute on March 22, 2024.

The Chairperson of the Board in this Decision selected whichever last offer of settlement on that issue which he found by a preponderance of the evidence most nearly conforms to the factors stated in Sec. 5.4, the Impartial Arbitration for Fire and Police Department Employee Disputes in the City Charter. The relevant portions of this Charter Section are as follows:
“The Arbitration Board shall decide each issue by majority vote by selecting whichever last offer of settlement on that issue it finds most nearly conforms with those factors traditionally taken into consideration in the determination of wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of public and private employment, including, but not limited to, changes in the average consumer price index for goods and services, the wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment of other employees performing similar services, and the financial condition of the City of Monterey and its ability to meet the cost of the award.”1 In weighing each proposal under these factors, the Board also considered the tentative agreements reached by the parties which are incorporated herein by this reference. The Chairperson worked with the parties to accept compromises 1 Employer Exhibit A: City of Monterey Charter Section 5.4 ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 7, Packet Page 46 3 on a variety of the economic and non-economic issues raised during this process and the parties made significant compromises to reach agreement on a number of issues and their final offers were significantly altered. The parties submitted the following issues for resolution to the Arbitration Board, with their final offer on each issue. The remaining issues are as follows:

1. Wages:
a. City Final Offer: 4% with retroactivity to July 1, 2022, and 4% with retroactvity to July 1, 2023.
b. MFFA Final Offer: 5% with retroactivity to July 1, 2022, and 5% with retroactivity to July 1, 2023.

2. Certification Pay:
a. City Final Offer: 2.5% increase for bargaining unit members who have received the California State Company Officer Certificate. Effective following implementation of the Board’s decision. No additional Certification Pay for the State of California Firefighter II Certification. b. MFFA Final Offer: Effective immediately a 2.5% increase for the Company Officer Certification or Classes: Company Officer 2a Human Resource Management, Company Officer 2b General Administrative Functions, Company Officer 2c Fire Inspections and Investigations, Company Officer 2d All Risk Command Operations, Company Officer 2e Wildland Incident Operations, Instructor I Instructor Methodology.

Effective Immediately 2.5% increase for the State of California Firefighter II certification.

3. Education Incentive:
a. City Final Offer: Status Quo – No change.
b. MFFA Final Offer: 2.5% Associates Degree or 60 units as proposed, grandfather those who already possess.

4. Compensatory Time Off:
a. City Final Offer: Eliminate CTO
b. MFFA Final Offer: Status Quo – No change
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 8, Packet Page 47 4 5. Overtime Calculation
a. City Final Offer: Eliminate MOU Overtime, follow FLSA b. MFFA Final Offer: Status Quo – No change

6. Minimum Staffing
a. City Final Offer: Eliminate minimum staffing requirements in the MOU b. MFFA Final Offer: Status Quo – No change

7. Interest Arbitration
a. City Final Offer: City may bring a future ballot measure to voters in Monterey to Amend Charter Section 5.4, to eliminate interest arbitration. b. MFFA Final Offer: Status Quo – No change.

ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
One of the essential issues in this interest arbitration is the lack of agreement between the parties over the comparability data. While both parties presented their analysis of the thirteen surveyed agencies, they did not utilize the same categories of compensation, or whether the use of median or averages is more appropriate to determine the City’s place in the thirteen agencies. While it is common to have a disagreement over where a particular employer should be placed in relation to other competing jurisdictions, such disagreements are compounded when there is no agreement amongst the parties as to what should be counted as compensation. Because the parties did not use common data, they came up with significantly different final analysis of where the MFFA bargaining unit lands amongst the thirteen agencies. The City’s opinion is that the MFFA in total compensation falls within market, with Firefighters 1.5% behind the median, Engineers 3.7% behind the median, and Captains 4% behind the median prior to their proposed increases. The MFFA on the other hand calculates Firefighters are between 7% and 18% behind the median depending on whether they are in their 1
st or 13th year of employment, and Engineers are
between 9% and 20% behind, and Captains are between 5% and 17% below the median. The City’s analysis uses highest compensation as the data benchmark ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 9, Packet Page 48 5 while the MFFA used the first and thirteenth years. One example of this lack of similar data points is that the City calculates that employees receive longevity pay while the MFFA calculates they do not receive any longevity pay. The evidence shows that senior employees who are grandfathered receive longevity pay while newer employees do not, as it was bargained away in a previous set of negotiations. I therefore recommend that before the parties begin their next set of negotiations they meet and agree upon a new survey of comparable jurisdictions with common data points of calculation, as well as lowering the number of jurisdictions surveyed. While I do not expect the parties to necessarily agree as to where MFFA employees should be placed amongst the competing agencies, the parties should be able to reach an agreement on the appropriate forms of compensation to be calculated and should use at least two to three seniority levels to survey.

In reaching my final recommendations I did conclude, based on the parties competing data, that MFFA members fall below the median of the surveyed agencies. I also conclude that the City is able to afford increases in compensation as the City is currently in good financial standing. In deciding which of the parties last, best offer on each issue most satisfies the statutory criteria I have relied upon not only the competing comparability studies of other agencies, but also the internal comparability evidence regarding agreements reached with the other bargaining units. This is traditionally an important factor to consider in public sector labor relations, as other City employees and their representatives want to feel they are treated in a similar fashion. I have also taken into account CPI data and considered the total impact of the individual selections I have made on the last best offers.

Based on the above noted criteria I selected the City’s last offer on Wages, but I also believe that additional compensation is warranted and have selected the Educational Incentive as the best area in which to award additional compensation beyond the City’s final economic package. This should help to keep MFFA employees from falling further behind the median income of neighboring jurisdictions. Although there is not compelling evidence of an inability ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 10, Packet Page 49 6 to recruit and retain employees at this time, it is important to not fall behind the curve of equitable compensation and working conditions. I have also determined that there is no reason to eliminate any of the other current benefits as suggested by the City in their final offers. I have therefore selected the following final offers.

1. Wages:

City Final Offer: 4% with retroactivity to July 1, 2022, and 4% with retroactivity to July 1, 2023
________________________________
Neutral Chairperson Arbitration Board
David A. Weinberg
April 25, 2024
________________________________
Association Panel Member – Concur/dissent
Janelle F. Crandall, Esq.
________________________________
City Panel Member – Concur/Dissent
Richard S. Whitmore, Esq.

2. Certification Pay:

City Final Offer: 2.5% increase for bargaining unit members who have received the California State Company Officer Certificate. Effective following implementation of the Board’s decision. No additional Certification Pay for the State of California Firefighter II Certification. ________________________________
Neutral Chairperson Arbitration Board
David A. Weinberg
________________________________
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 11, Packet Page 50 7 Association Panel Member – Concur/dissent
Janelle F. Crandall, Esq.
________________________________
City Panel Member – Concur/Dissent
Richard S. Whitmore, Esq.

3. Education Incentive:

MFFA Final Offer: 2.5% Associates Degree or 60 units as proposed, grandfather those who already possess.
________________________________
Neutral Chairperson Arbitration Board
David A. Weinberg
________________________________
Association Panel Member – Concur/dissent
Janelle F. Crandall, Esq.
________________________________
City Panel Member – Concur/Dissent
Richard S. Whitmore, Esq.

4. Compensatory Time Off:

MFFA Final Offer: Status Quo – No change
________________________________
Neutral Chairperson Arbitration Board
David A. Weinberg
________________________________
Association Panel Member – Concur/dissent
Janelle F. Crandall, Esq.
________________________________
City Panel Member – Concur/Dissent
Richard S. Whitmore, Esq.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 12, Packet Page 51 8 5. Overtime Calculation
MFFA Final Offer: Status Quo – No change
________________________________
Neutral Chairperson Arbitration Board
David A. Weinberg
________________________________
Association Panel Member – Concur/dissent
Janelle F. Crandall, Esq.
________________________________
City Panel Member – Concur/Dissent
Richard S. Whitmore, Esq.

6. Minimum Staffing
MFFA Final Offer: Status Quo – No change
________________________________
Neutral Chairperson Arbitration Board
David A. Weinberg
________________________________
Association Panel Member – Concur/dissent
Janelle F. Crandall, Esq.
________________________________
City Panel Member – Concur/Dissent
Richard S. Whitmore, Esq.

7. Interest Arbitration
MFFA Final Offer: Status Quo – No change
________________________________
Neutral Chairperson Arbitration Board
David A. Weinberg
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 13, Packet Page 52 9 ________________________________
Association Panel Member – Concur/dissent
Janelle F. Crandall, Esq.
________________________________
City Panel Member – Concur/Dissent
Richard S. Whitmore, Esq.

In rendering this Award, the Chairperson worked with the parties to accept compromises on a variety of the economic and non-economic issues raised during this process, so as to best meet the needs of the represented employees and the City. Their final offers represented significant compromises from their earlier held positions. I ultimately selected the last offer of settlement on that issue which I found most nearly conforms with factors traditionally taken into consideration in the determination of wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of public and private employment, including, but not limited to, changes in the average consumer price index for goods and services, the wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment of other employees performing similar services, and the financial condition of the City of Monterey and its ability to meet the cost of the award
________________________________
Neutral Chairperson Arbitration Board
David A. Weinberg
April 26, 2024
As the City representative on the Arbitration Panel, I would like to submit my CONCUR/DISSENT opinions as follows:

Issue No. 1 – Wages
CONCUR
Issue No. 2 – Certification Pay
CONCUR
Issue No. 3 – Educational Incentive

DISSENT
Issue No. 4 – Compensatory Time Off
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 14, Packet Page 53 10 DISSENT – Compensatory Time Off (CTO) can only be used as a method of paying for overtime worked if there is an agreement to provide it. Absent an agreement between a public employer and its employees, overtime must paid for by time and one half wages. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) prohibits using CTO unless there is an explicit agreement to do so. 29 USCS 207(o)(2)(A)(i) sets out the requirement as follows:
“A public agency may provide compensatory time off only pursuant to :
(i) applicable provisions of a collective bargaining agreement, memorandum
of understanding or any other agreement between the public agency and
representatives of such employees” (Emphasis added)
In the present case, obviously there is no agreement to provide CTO. Yet, the Arbitration Award purports to require the City to provide it. If the City complies with the Award, it appears that the City would violate the law. At a minimum, the Award would be subject to a legal challenge in court.

Compensatory time off should not – and legally cannot – be continued by this Award and I therefore dissent.

Issue No. 5 – Overtime

DISSENT
Issue No. 6 – Minimum Staffing

DISSENT
Issue No. 7 – Interest Arbitration

DISSENT
________________________________
City Panel Member
Richard S. Whitmore, Esq.

As the Monterey Firefighters Association representative on the Arbitration Panel, I would like to submit my CONCUR/DISSENT opinions as follows:

Issue No. 1 – Wages

DISSENT
Issue No. 2 – Certification Pay
DISSENT - Providing a 2.5% increase for the State of California Firefighter II Certification aligns with industry standard practices and ensures the City of Monterey remains competitive within the firefighting profession. Firefighter II Certificates represent a significant investment of time, effort, and resources in acquiring specialized skills and expertise. In the majority of comparable agencies, it is recognized that acquiring advanced certifications significantly enhances the capabilities and effectiveness of firefighting personnel. As such, offering financial incentives for obtaining these certifications has become an accepted practice aimed at attracting and retaining skilled firefighters.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 15, Packet Page 54 11 Issue No. 3 – Educational Incentive
CONCUR
Issue No. 4 – Compensatory Time Off
CONCUR
.Issue No. 5 – Overtime
CONCUR
Issue No. 6 – Minimum Staffing
CONCUR
Issue No. 7 – Interest Arbitration
CONCUR
________________________________
Association Panel Member
Janelle F. Crandall, Esq
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 7., Item Page 16, Packet Page 55 Council
Agenda Report
№07/19
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
Prepared by: Elizabeth Hammond, Intern, City Manager’s Office SUBJECT: Authorize the Mayor to Sign a Letter on Behalf of the City Supporting AB 2410 (Wallis) Meal Program: Senior Citizens. (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a letter on behalf of the City of Monterey supporting AB 2410 (Wallis) Meal Program: Senior Citizens. This bill would amend Section 18327 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to nutrition, by expanding the existing framework for nutrition funding to include projects that provide at least five (5) meals a week available for pickup by eligible individuals 60 years and older.

VALUE DRIVER:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City of Monterey advocates on behalf of the community’s interests at the regional, state, and federal level. The City Council weighs in on proposed legislation and ballot initiatives on an as-needed basis.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no costs to the City of Monterey incurred in connection with authorizing the Mayor to sign this letter.

According to the State of California’s Assembly Committee on Appropriations, the California Department of Aging (CDA), on behalf of COA, estimates, at a minimum, needing an additional $250 million annual General Fund investment based on the increased number of individuals served by older adult nutrition programs with federal relief funding made available to the Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) during the COVID pandemic. This cost represents 1.15 million older Californians estimated to be living in poverty (less 200,000 currently participating in older adult nutrition programs), receiving one meal at an estimated cost of $14 per meal, five times a week, taking into account existing funding sources.

Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 8.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 1, Packet Page 56 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City could choose not to support this legislative package. This is not recommended, however, because this package adds funding for nutrition programs for seniors which offer to-go meals, which is the current practice of the City of Monterey’s partnership with Meals on Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula.

DISCUSSION:

Overview of AB 2410
Assemblymember Greg Wallis introduced AB 2410 Meal Program: Senior Citizens on February 12, 2024 to signal the Legislature’s intent to provide a to-go meal program for seniors. This bill would amend Section 18327 of the Welfare and Institutions Code to add the establishment of projects that five (5) or more days a week provide at least one (1) meal per day to be either served hot or made available for to-go for reheating at home by eligible individuals.

This bill represents the shift in programming that occurred during COVID-19 as nutrition projects for seniors were forced to move away from congregate settings for safety reasons. During this shift in meal delivery, cities saw an increase in enrollment as more seniors utilized the to-go meal option. Though the intent of meal delivery in a congregate setting was to simultaneously provide opportunities for social interaction for seniors, to-go meals engage more seniors in healthy nutrition as well as increase access to social engagement. Increasing engagement with seniors through increased enrollment in meal programs has provided a bridge to other city programs and an entry point in offering services to this vulnerable population.

Offering to-go meals acknowledges the various challenges that seniors face in caring for their health and well-being, including having prescription schedules or medical appointments that may interfere with set times for congregate meal delivery. It also recognizes that rising food costs mean that food-insecure seniors are in greater need than ever of options for nutritionally balanced meals.

The text of AB 2410, as amended in Assembly April 16, 2024, is attached (Attachment 2).

AB 2410 is connected to the Governor’s 2021 Master Plan for Aging (MPA) by addressing Goals Two, Three, and Five of the five bold goals laid out by the MPA in 2024-2025:
 Goal One: Housing for All Ages and Stages
 Goal Two: Health Reimagined
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 2, Packet Page 57  Goal Three: Inclusion and Equity, Not Isolation
 Goal Four: Caregiving That Works
 Goal Five: Affording Aging
This bill would provide longer-term support for funding programs that are demonstrated to work well for seniors by including to-go meals programs in the annual state implementation plan for the federal Older Americans Act of 1965. This builds on lessons learned during COVID-19 regarding seniors’ participation in nutrition programming and formalizes the program changes that emerged.

AB 2410 continues to work its way through the Legislature and heads to the Assembly for a second reading on May 20, prior to the City Council meeting. On May 16, the Committee of Appropriations passed the bill with the following votes: 11 ayes, 0 noes, and 4 abstains/absent.

Prior to that, it passed the Committee on Aging and Long-Term Care.

How AB 2410 Would Support Seniors in Monterey
Currently, the City’s Recreation Division focuses on providing activities for older adults in the community at Scholze Park Center. As part of that focus, Monterey Recreation and Meals on Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula partner to offer meals Monday through Friday, 11 a.m. to noon for those 60 and older.

Prior to the pandemic, only 984 meals were served at Schulze Park Center strictly in a congregate format due to funding requirements in the State of California. However, COVID-19 fundamentally changed the delivery format for meals in order to continue providing nutritious food for seniors. Once the City of Monterey shifted to offering to-go meals as part of COVID-19 program changes, participation dramatically increased. Because of the success of the to-go format, the City with Meals on Wheels of Monterey Peninsula has continued to offer to-go meals. From April 1 to March 31, 2024, 4,885 meals were distributed at Scholze Park Center in Monterey – an incredible five-fold increase from pre-pandemic numbers. Participation at its lowest period averaged five (5) seniors per day and a near-shuttering of the program whereas today, over 30 seniors participate daily and the City offers a full five-day weekly meal schedule.

Currently, over 60% of the seniors receiving to-go meals also engage in other programming at the Center. The stated guidelines for congregate dining were to provide social engagement to seniors; however, the increased connection to the Center through higher utilization of the to-go meal program has resulted in increased social engagement in other forms of programming. The City trains staff to build relationships during the pick-up meal process, engaging in conversation, keeping seniors informed of other program offerings, and developing relationships that create safe spaces for seniors to seek out support.

Amending the current funding guidelines to include five (5) day a week to-go meal programs is an intuitive next step in funding and formalizing the positive gains to senior nutrition access and community connection made since the pandemic.

The League of California Cities currently supports this bill and is expected to consider formal support of this legislative package later this year.

NR/eh
Attachments: 1. Draft Letter of Support
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 3, Packet Page 58

2. AB 2410 Bill Text (Amended in Assembly on March 21, 2024) Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 4, Packet Page 59 May 7, 2024
The Honorable Buffy Wicks
Chair, Assembly Appropriations Committee
1020 N Street, Room 8220
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: Support for AB 2410 (Wallis) Meal Program: Senior Citizens.

Dear Assemblymember Wicks,
The City of Monterey is pleased to support AB 2410 (Wallis), which would include the establishment of projects that support nutrition assistance for seniors by including meals made available for pick-up. This is an intuitive bill that supports programs we already see making an effective difference in feeding seniors in our community.

The pandemic forced programmatic changes to feeding seniors as nutritional assistance continued, albeit in a modified manner. As cities began offering meal pick-up options, many cities - including the City of Monterey - began to see a dramatic increase in program participation. These enrollment increases have continued even as the pandemic ended, signaling ongoing demand for flexible meal options for seniors.

In our City, the calendar year prior to the pandemic saw only 984 meals served when strictly in a congregate setting. From April 1 to March 31, 2024, the City’s partnership with Meals on Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula saw 4,885 meals distributed at Scholze Park Center in Monterey – an incredible five-fold increase. This looked like going from an average of 5 seniors per day and a near-shuttering of the program to a robust 30+ participants daily and full five-day weekly meal schedule. With over 60% of the current seniors also engaging in other programming, the link between the meals and other forms of social engagement is strong. The City trains staff to build relationships during the pick-up meal process, engaging in conversation, keeping seniors informed of other program offerings, and developing relationships that create safe spaces for seniors to seek out support.

Aging makes the components of healthy eating more difficult, with shopping and fresh food preparation becoming an increasing physical challenge for seniors who often live in singleperson households. In the City of Monterey, many of those aging are house-rich yet cash-poor.

This means they depend on fixed incomes at a time when food and living costs are skyrocketing. Limited incomes force difficult choices around eating and health, with nutrientdense and fresh food becoming less accessible for many. Seniors also face a broad array of health challenges, with varied prescription and medical appointment scheduling needs.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 5, Packet Page 60 Part of aging is vulnerability and loss of agency in some areas of life. Restoring agency to seniors to choose the manner in which they consume nutritious food dignifies and empowers this vulnerable demographic. Food-insecure seniors can still access the vital meals they need while continuing to engage in other important areas of their lives. Increased engagement in meal programs through funding to-go meal options means that more seniors get information about other relevant services and build bridges to further support.

The City of Monterey supports increasing access for our seniors to receive meals in the way that makes the most sense for their needs. By adding funding for to-go meal options, cities can continue to effectively serve seniors in ways that show demonstrated progress in addressing food insecurity.

For these reasons and more, the City of Monterey whole-heartedly supports AB 2410.

Sincerely,
Tyller Williamson
Mayor
cc: Mayor and City Council
The Honorable Greg Wallis, State Assemblymember, 47th District The Honorable John Laird, State Senator, 17th District
The Honorable Dawn Addis, State Assemblymember, 30th District Deanna Sessums, Regional Public Affairs Manager for Cal Cities League of California Cities (via email: [email protected]) ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 6, Packet Page 61 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 16, 2024
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 21, 2024
california legislature—2023–24 regular session
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 2410
Introduced by Assembly Member Wallis
February 12, 2024
An act to amend Section 18327 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to nutrition.
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 2410, as amended, Wallis. Meal program: senior citizens.

Existing law establishes the California Department of Aging within the California Health and Human Services Agency. Existing law authorizes the department to make specified funds available for nutrition projects serving the needs of individuals 60 years of age or over and their spouses, as specified. Existing law, the McCarthy-Kennick Nutrition Program for the Elderly Act of 1972, among other things, establishes the Nutrition Reserve Fund for the purpose of maintaining existing nutrition services and lending moneys to senior nutrition projects, as specified. Existing law requires the California Commission on Aging, with the approval of the Secretary of the California Health and Human Services Agency, to develop and submit to the federal government a state plan for implementing the federal Older Americans Act of 1965, as amended, by May 1 of each year. Existing law requires the state plan to include the establishment of projects that provide at least one hot meal per day for 5 or more days per week, as specified.

This bill would require the above-described state plan to include the establishment of projects that would provide, at least 5 days per week, 97 ATTCHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 7, Packet Page 62 at least one meal per day and any additional meals the contracting agency or organization may elect to provide, to be made available for pickup by eligible individuals 60 years of age or older. The bill would specify the meal is not required to be hot or ready-to-eat at the time of pickup.

This bill would instead require that the projects provide those meals either served hot or made available for to-go pickup for reheating at home by eligible individuals.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.

State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
line 1 SECTION 1. Section 18327 of the Welfare and Institutions line 2 Code is amended to read:
line 3 18327. The state plan referred to in Section 18326 shall include, line 4 but not be limited to, the following:
line 5 (1)  Establishment of projects that, five or more days per week, line 6 provide at least one hot meal per day meal per day, either served line 7 hot or made available for to-go pickup for reheating at home by line 8 eligible individuals, and any additional meals the contracting line 9 agency or organization may elect to provide that ensures line 10 recommended dietary allowances.
line 11 (2)  Provision of nutrition projects for individuals 60 years of line 12 age or older who are eligible.
line 13 (3)  Furnishing of sites for nutrition projects in close proximity line 14 to concentrations of eligible individuals’ residences, such as line 15 schools, churches, senior centers and facilities serving the aging. line 16 (4)  Utilization of administrative methods to ensure maximum line 17 participation of eligible individuals.
line 18 (5)  Provision of special menus, when feasible, to meet particular line 19 dietary needs arising from health or religious requirements or line 20 ethnic backgrounds.
line 21 (6)  Provision of settings conducive to including, as a part of line 22 these projects, recreational activities, information, health and line 23 welfare counseling, and referral services.
line 24 (7)  Provision of appropriate modes of transportation essential line 25 to maximum participation of eligible individuals confined to their line 26 homes.
97 AB 2410 — 2 —
ATTCHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 8, Packet Page 63 line 1 (8)  Establishment and administration of projects with the advice line 2 of persons competent in the field and of older Californians who line 3 will themselves participate in the program.
line 4 (9)  Nutrition education.
line 5 (10)  Establishment of projects that, five or more days per week, line 6 provide at least one meal per day and any additional meals the line 7 contracting agency or organization may elect to provide, to be line 8 made available for to-go pickup by eligible individuals 60 years line 9 of age or older. The meal shall not be required to be hot or line 10 ready-to-eat at the time of pickup.

O
97 — 3 — AB 2410
ATTCHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 8., Item Page 9, Packet Page 64 Council
Agenda Report
№09/24
FROM: Andrea Renny, PE, PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Marissa Garcia, Engineering Assistant II
SUBJECT: Authorizing a Letter of Support for the Transportation Agency for Monterey County Application to the Active Transportation Program (ATP) for the Fort Ord Regional Trail & Greenway Project in Conjunction with the North Fremont Gap Project and Authorizing a Grant Application and Letter of Intent to be a Partner Agency (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council authorize:

1. the Mayor to sign a Letter of Support on behalf of the City supporting the Application by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) to the Active Transportation Program (ATP) for the Fort Ord Regional Trail & Greenway Project (FORTAG) in conjunction with the North Fremont Gap Project, and

2. the City Manager, or their designee, to sign the Grant Application and Letter of Intent to be a Partner Agency.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

Recognize that City government’s role is to provide core services to the public, and partnerships with nonprofit, military, business, and other government agencies can be an effective means of supporting the public good.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with the City Council’s Value Drives and Strategic Priorities of Active Mobility – “The Council is committed to developing policies and supporting plans that create an environment where people, bicycles, buses, trolleys, and motor vehicles can move through the community safely and efficiently. The City Council also prioritizes pedestrian and bicyclist safety and mobility over driver convenience and continues to value “Vision Zero” strategies of education, equity, engineering, evaluation, and enforcement.” and Fiscal Stewardship – “Identify and seek grant funding opportunities for City services and infrastructure, including parks, recreation, library, museums, public safety, fire prevention, and planning.” CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

If the grant application is successful, the City would be required to provide matching funds for the North Fremont Gap Project component. The final estimate for the matching amount is not Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 9.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 1, Packet Page 65 yet determined but is estimated to be approximately $500,000. The City has determined several potential matching funding sources including the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) and Measure X.

The North Fremont Gap Project Matching Funds (COK-04) is a currently proposed project for the FY24-25 cycle of the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program to provide matching funds for the North Fremont Gap Project. If this project is recommended by the NCIP Committee and then approved by City Council, an appropriation will go towards the matching funds for this grant application. Additionally, as of April 25, 2024, the Measure X Identified Safety Projects account has sufficient funding, which could also be utilized as matching funds if the grant application is successful.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose not to authorize the Mayor to sign this letter of support or authorize the City Manager to sign the application as a Partner Agency. This is not recommended as it would eliminate any chance that the City would receive Active Transportation Program Funds and partner with TAMC on this regional project.

DISCUSSION:

The Active Transportation Program (ATP) is a competitive statewide program created to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking. Senate Bill 99 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, Chapter 359, Statutes of 2013) and Assembly Bill 101 (Committee on Budget, Chapter 354, Statutes of 2013) created the ATP, and Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) (Beall, Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) directs additional funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account to the ATP.

The City of Monterey and Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) are working collaboratively to submit a grant application for the ATP program. TAMC, as the County’s Regional Transportation Planning Agency, would be the Lead Agency with the City of Monterey as a partner agency. The application would include a segment of the Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway (FORTAG) within Laguna Grande Park and the North Fremont Gap Project.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 2, Packet Page 66 Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway
The Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway (FORTAG) was envisioned and planned by local residents led by two Cal State Monterey Bay professors with the goal of transforming active transportation in Monterey County. The FORTAG is a 28-mile multi-use trail that will create a wide, landscaped pathway for all ages and abilities through urban areas and open space. The trail will connect disadvantaged communities in Monterey, Seaside, Marina, and Monterey County to the regional network of trails, including the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreation Trail.

The FORTAG will spur a new level of healthy and physical activity in a region that displays high rates of obesity and diabetes.

The FORTAG Laguna Grande segment is 0.8-miles and includes a signalized pedestrian crossing, a 12-foot paved path in Laguna Grande Regional Park, and 675 feet of trail on Fremont Boulevard. This segment closes three gaps in the regional bicycle and pedestrian network and will connect disadvantaged communities in the Seaside to elementary schools, employment centers in Monterey, and recreation opportunities. The FORTAG Laguna Grande segment will also connect to the Canyon Del Rey segment of FORTAG, a 1.5-mile segment that runs alongside State Route 218 through three parks and ends at Del Rey Woods Elementary School.

After an extensive public engagement process and completion of the FORTAG environmental impact report, the Laguna Grande segment is now ready for design and construction. It will leverage local Measure X funding and has strong support from the cities of Seaside and Monterey, the Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District, residents and businesses. This segment is also part of the City’s Mobility Plan adopted in 2021.

North Fremont Gap Project
There is currently a gap in the existing sidewalk along the north side of North Fremont Street, between Casanova Avenue and Canyon Del Rey Boulevard (also known as California State Route 218). The gap prevents continuous pedestrian movement in this location, where pedestrians must either cross North Fremont Street to use the sidewalk, use the travel lane, or negotiate an uneven dirt path beyond a metal guardrail. The purpose of the Project is to connect/complete the sidewalk and improve safety by providing a pathway for pedestrian and cyclist connectivity along the north side of North Fremont Street with a Class I multi-use trail and consists of a prefabricated steel truss bridge with concrete abutments at either end.

The gap closure project was previously included as part of the North Fremont Bicycle and Pedestrian Access and Safety Improvements project, Federal Aid Project No. ATPL-5086 (034), which included improvements on North Fremont Street between Casa Verde Way and Canyon Del Rey Boulevard. The previous project included the design of a wall retaining across a small intermittent creek adjacent to the westbound lanes of North Fremont Street between Casanova and Canyon Del Rey Blvd. The original wall design was proposed to be a cantilevered retaining wall founded on cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) piles and located very close to – and possibly encroaching into - an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA). At the time, the bids were too high and with the failing signals, lack of compliant curb ramps, and lack of adequate biking facilities, a decision was made to fund the segment between Casa Verde and Casanova. City staff has applied for two rounds of Prop 68 funds as well as a Clean California Grant but was not successful.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 3, Packet Page 67 The completed North Fremont project installed all new signals, fiber optic communication to signals, ADA compliant curb ramps, storm drain improvements and a class IV bike lane from Casa Verde to Casanova. The “Gap” project connects the Class IV bike lanes to the FORTAG Trail.

This project has maintained community support and has a proposed project with the FY24-25 Cycle of the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program to provide matching funds for the North Fremont Gap Project (Project COK-04).
2025 Active Transportation Program
In advance of the 2025 Active Transportation Program staff from TAMC and the City of Monterey discussed the current funding opportunities and potential projects for the Monterey County region. Both TAMC and the City have a history of successful Active Transportation Program Projects. However, the program has become increasingly competitive and receives significantly more applications than can be funded by the program. Through discussions with TAMC staff, it was determined that combining the segment of FORTAG in Laguna Grande Park with the North Fremont Gap, could improve the City’s ability to secure grant funding to construct the North Fremont Gap Project.

The Active Transportation Program Guidelines require a Partner Agency to submit a Letter of Intent which provides the confirmation to cooperate with TAMC and set aside matching funds.

The current estimate of matching funds is approximately $500,000, and TAMC staff and City Staff are working to refine this estimate during the application preparation process. The final estimate would be included in the Letter of Intent.

This letter of support would be signed by the Mayor on behalf of the City Council and addressed to the Active Transportation Program Selection Committee, who review the Active Transportation Program applications.

Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a Letter of Support and authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to sign the grant application and letter of intent to be a Partner Agency.

MG/pl
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Draft Letter of Support

3. Draft Letter of Intent
e: Amelia Conlen, Transportation Agency for Monterey County Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 4, Packet Page 68 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AUTHORIZING A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

FOR MONTEREY COUNTY APPLICATION TO THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

PROGRAM (ATP) FOR THE FORT ORD REGIONAL TRAIL & GREENWAY

PROJECT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE NORTH FREMONT GAP PROJECT AND

AUTHORIZING A GRANT APPLICATION AND LETTER OF INTENT TO BE A

PARTNER AGENCY
WHEREAS, there is currently a gap in the existing sidewalk along the north side of North Fremont Street, between Casanova Avenue and Canyon Del Rey Boulevard (California State Route 218);
WHEREAS, the gap prevents continuous pedestrian movement in this location, where pedestrians must either cross North Fremont Street to use the sidewalk, use the travel lane, or negotiate an uneven dirt path beyond a metal guardrail; WHEREAS, the purpose of the North Fremont Street Sidewalk Gap Closure Project is to connect/complete the sidewalk and provide safety improvements to the pathway for pedestrian and cyclist connectivity along the north side of North Fremont Street with a Class I multi-use trail;
WHEREAS, the Transportation Agency for Monterey County is submitting a Grant Application for the Fort Ord Regional Trail & Greenway and include the North Fremont Gap Project as a component of the Project;
WHEREAS, the City has determined several potential matching funding sources including the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) and Measure X; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey intends to be a Partner Agency to the Transportation Agency for Monterey County for the 2025 Active Transportation Program Grant Application; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey is preparing a letter of intent to be a Partner Agency per the requirements of the Active Transportation Program Grant Application; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 5, Packet Page 69

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby authorizes the Mayor to sign a Letter of Support and authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to sign the grant application and letter of intent to be a Partner Agency.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 6, Packet Page 70 ATTACHMENT 2
CITY HALL • MONTEREY • CALIFORNIA • 93940 • 831.646.3921 Website • www.monterey.org
May 22, 2024
California Department of Transportation
Division of Local Assistance, MS-1
Attn: Chief, Office of Active Transportation and Special Program P.O. Box 942874
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: Support for the Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway (FORTAG) – Laguna Grande Segment & North Fremont Gap Project
Dear Active Transportation Program Selection Committee:

I am writing on behalf of the City of Monterey to express support for the Transportation Agency for Monterey County’s grant application for the Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway (FORTAG) – Laguna Grande Segment, including the North Fremont Gap Project. This project will create safe connections for people walking and biking between Laguna Grande Regional Park and four neighboring parks, which are currently separated by high-volume, high-speed roadways. It will also connect Laguna Grande Park to the Canyon Del Rey segment of the FORTAG trail, which will start construction this summer, and the Monterey Bay Recreation trail, which provides safe bicycle access to the neighboring cities of Monterey and Marina.

The FORTAG was envisioned and planned by local residents led by two Cal State professors with the goal of transforming active transportation in Monterey County. The FORTAG is a 28-mile multi-use trail that will create a wide, landscaped pathway for people of all ages and abilities through urban areas and open space. The trail will connect disadvantaged communities in Seaside, Marina, and Monterey County to the regional network of trails, including the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreation Trail. The FORTAG will spur a new level of healthy physical activity in a region that displays high rates of obesity and diabetes.

The FORTAG Laguna Grande segment closes two gaps in the regional multi-use path network and will connect disadvantaged communities in the Seaside to elementary schools, employment centers in Monterey, health services, and recreation opportunities.

The FORTAG Laguna Grande segment will also connect to the Canyon Del Rey segment of FORTAG, a 1.5-mile segment that runs alongside State Route 218 through three parks and ends at Del Rey Woods Elementary School.

After an extensive public engagement process and completion of the FORTAG environmental impact report, the Laguna Grande segment is now ready for design and Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 7, Packet Page 71 ATTACHMENT 2
CITY HALL • MONTEREY • CALIFORNIA • 93940 • 831.646.3921 Website • www.monterey.org
construction. It will leverage local Measure X funding and enjoys strong support from the Cities of Seaside and Monterey, the Monterey Peninsula Regional Parks District, and residents.

The inclusion of the North Fremont Gap Project which is adjacent to the Laguna Grande Segment of FORTAG increase the connectivity to Laguna Grande Parking and the neighboring City of Seaside.

The City of Monterey supports this important active transportation project and asks that you approve the grant request. Thank you for your consideration of this project.

Sincerely,
Mayor Tyller Williamson
City of Monterey
Cc: Todd Muck, Executive Director, Transportation Agency for Monterey County Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 8, Packet Page 72 ATTACHMENT 3
CITY HALL • MONTEREY • CALIFORNIA • 93940 • 831.646.3921 Website • www.monterey.org
May 22, 2024
California Department of Transportation
Division of Local Assistance, MS-1
Attn: Chief, Office of Active Transportation and Special Program P.O. Box 942874
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: Letter of Intent for the Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway (FORTAG) – Laguna Grande Segment & North Fremont Gap Project
Dear Active Transportation Program Selection Committee:

This letter is intended to memorialize the City of Monterey’s commitment to delivering the Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway (FORTAG) – Laguna Grande Segment & North Fremont Gap Project if grant funds are awarded as a Partner Agency to the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC).

The Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway (FORTAG) was envisioned and planned by local residents led by two Cal State professors with the goal of transforming active transportation in Monterey County. The FORTAG is a 28-mile multi-use trail that will create a wide, landscaped pathway for all ages and abilities through urban areas and open space. The trail will connect disadvantaged communities in Seaside, Marina, and Monterey County to the regional network of trails including the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail. The FORTAG will spur a new level of healthy, physical activity in a region that displays high rates of obesity and diabetes.

The North Fremont Gap component would address the current gap in the existing sidewalk along the north side of North Fremont Street, between Casanova Avenue and Canyon Del Rey Boulevard (also known as California State Route 218). The gap prevents continuous pedestrian movement in this location, where pedestrians must either cross North Fremont Street to use the sidewalk, use the travel lane, or negotiate an uneven dirt path beyond a metal guardrail. The purpose of the Project is to connect/complete the sidewalk and improve safety by providing a pathway for pedestrian and cyclist connectivity along the north side of North Fremont Street with a Class I multi-use trail and consists of a prefabricated steel truss bridge with concrete abutments at either end.

In 2016, Monterey County voters approved a local transportation sales tax measure, Measure X, where 3/8 percent of sales tax support local controlled roadway safety and maintenance programs and the City also receives funds from the City’s Neighborhood Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 9, Packet Page 73 ATTACHMENT 3
CITY HALL • MONTEREY • CALIFORNIA • 93940 • 831.646.3921 Website • www.monterey.org
and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) established in 1985, the NCIP directs tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City's residential neighborhoods. Under a Charter Amendment, at least 16 percent of the money collected through hotel taxes (Transient Occupancy Tax) is allocated to neighborhood and community improvements.

Sincerely,
Hans Uslar
City of Monterey
Cc: Todd Muck, Executive Director, Transportation Agency for Monterey County Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 9., Item Page 10, Packet Page 74 Council
Agenda Report
№09/24
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 401 Pearl Street (Monterey Tennis Center); Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Montgomery Roth and Richard Snelling (Monterey Waves, LLC); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Concession Agreement Extension (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint agency negotiators for a conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 to discuss and provide confidential direction for terms and conditions for an extension of the concession agreement.

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

City Council approval is required for real estate transactions. Closed session confidential review of real estate matters is allowed.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: The Levine Act does not apply to the appointment of staff negotiators. The Levine Act does apply to any resulting agreement.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications related to the recommendation to appoint agency negotiators.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 10.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 1, Packet Page 75 question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to appoint negotiators or appoint different negotiators. This is not recommended by staff. It is appropriate that the Council appoint agency negotiators and authorize a confidential discussion regarding the price and terms for any extension to the concession agreement.

DISCUSSION:

The City entered into a three-year concession agreement with Monterey Waves, LLC on December 15, 2021 for the Monterey Tennis Center. The agreement is scheduled to expire December 31, 2024. The Monterey Tennis Center consists of six lighted courts, a pro shop and fenced patio area. Activities and services offered include tennis and pickleball play, junior summer tennis camps, private lessons, memberships, team building events, and racquet restringing.

In 2021, the City resurfaced all six courts, installed two access gates, replaced three benches and secured the patio area with fencing. The concessionaire installed padded light pole covers, painted the walls located on courts 1 and 2, removed dated equipment, and installed new windscreens.

With the concession agreement scheduled to expire December 31, 2024, it is recommended to conduct a closed session discussion with the City’s real estate negotiators to discuss the Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 2, Packet Page 76 expiring concession agreement. Closed session discussions are allowed and appropriate to provide confidential discussion for real estate matters.

JA/ad
e: Monty Roth, Monterey Waves, LLC
Richard Snelling, Monterey Waves, LLC
Karen Larson, City of Monterey, Parks and Recreation Director Louie Marcuzzo, City of Monterey, Park Operations Manager Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 10., Item Page 3, Packet Page 77 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Levi Hill, AICP, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Levy Assessments to Fund the Cannery Row, New Monterey, and North Fremont Business Improvement Districts (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

If there is not a majority protest by affected business owners after the public hearing, the City Council should adopt the attached resolutions to levy the assessments to fund the Business Improvement Districts (BIDs).

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

These BIDs were formed under the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, which authorizes assessments against businesses (collected with business license taxes) to finance activities and improvements to specific business areas. These BIDs must be renewed annually.

This is the second of two steps required to continue the BIDs’ assessments for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. The first step was the adoption of the Resolutions of Intent to Levy Assessment on May 7, 2024. The second step is the public hearing.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The City of Monterey collects the BID assessment as part of the business license collection.

This money is passed directly to the Business District. Each business district has adopted a different assessment rate.

The Cannery Row BID was established in 2004 and it collects a 100% surcharge to the business license fee of each business up to a maximum assessment of $5,000 per business.

For businesses classified as professional services, the assessment is a 25% surcharge to the business license fee with a cap of $500. The amount of revenue collected annually is approximately $130,000 to $140,000.

Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 11.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 1, Packet Page 78 №10/24
The New Monterey BID was established in 1995 and it collects an annual assessment of 25% of the business license fee with a cap of $250. The amount of revenue collected annually is approximately $14,000.

The North Fremont BID was established in 2003 and it collects an annual assessment of 25% of the business license fee with a cap of $500. The amount of revenue collected annually is approximately $18,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, this is not a project because it does not cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not subject to CEQA. Subsequent projects resulting from this funding will be reviewed for their CEQA status.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to adopt the resolutions. To disestablish the BIDs, the City Council would be required to adopt an ordinance after holding a public hearing on the disestablishment, as provided in Streets & Highways Code section 36550.

DISCUSSION:

The purpose of the hearing is to adopt Resolutions to levy the assessments for the next fiscal year. The New Monterey and North Fremont BIDs use the assessment funds for promotions, beautification, and business recruitment, as well as advertising. The Cannery Row BID is focused on physical and operational upgrades since the Cannery Row Marketing Council already does promotion.

Funds for each BID are collected primarily from the assessment of businesses within the district.

At the public hearing, oral and written protests will be accepted from any interested person.

California Streets and Highways Code sections 36524-36525 establish the process for protests to be considered. Any protest pertaining to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceedings shall be in writing and shall clearly set forth the irregularity or defect to which the objection is made.

Written protests shall be filed with the City Clerk at or before the time fixed for the public hearing. Written protests will not be counted if the person protesting is not the owner of the business. The City Council may waive any irregularity in the form or content of any written protest and at the public hearing, may correct any minor defects in the proceedings. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the hearing.

If written protests are received from the owners of businesses in the proposed area which pay 50 percent or more of the assessments proposed to be levied, and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than 50 percent, no further proceedings to levy the proposed assessment shall be taken for one year from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the City Council. If the majority protest is only against the furnishing of a specified Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 2, Packet Page 79 №10/24
type or types of improvement or activity within the area, those types of improvements or activities shall be eliminated.

The City Council should open the public hearing, take public comments, and if there is not a majority protest, approve the resolutions.

LH
Attachments: 1. Cannery Row BID Resolution

2. New Monterey BID Resolution

3. North Fremont BID Resolution
e: Bonnie Adams, Cannery Row Business Association
Christina Riddoch, New Monterey Business Association
Kelly Violini, North Fremont Business Association
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 3, Packet Page 80 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE CANNERY ROW BUSINESS DISTRICT AND ADOPTING THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2024/2025 FISCAL YEAR WHEREAS, the Cannery Row Business Improvement District was established by the adoption of City Code section 18-60 et seq. in 2004;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets & Highways Code sections 36533 and 36534, on May 7, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 24-065 C.S., approving the annual report and declaring its intention to hold a public hearing on May 21, 2024 to levy and collect assessments in the parking and business improvement area for the Cannery Row Business Improvement District;
WHEREAS, improvements and activities include advocating for and constructing traffic and parking improvements; establishing and meeting cleanliness standards (trash pickup, etc.); improving the area’s streetscape; coordinating with existing businesses and the Cannery Row Marketing Council to stimulate business through collaboration; advocating Cannery Row business needs to government agencies for infrastructure and service enhancements; improving public safety; and hiring management staff to represent Cannery Row business interests consistent with Parking and Business Improvement Area law of 1989; WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 36523(a), the City Clerk gave notice of the May 21, 2024 public hearing by causing Resolution 24-065 C.S. to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the city not less than seven days before the public hearing. The notice stated that written and oral protests may be made at the hearing; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, this is not a project because it does not cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not subject to CEQA. Subsequent projects resulting from this funding will be reviewed for their CEQA status.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. It finds the foregoing recitals are true and correct have served, together with the supporting documents, as the basis for the findings and approvals set forth below.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 4, Packet Page 81

2. It confirms the annual report approved with the adoption of Resolution 24-065 C.S.

This report is on file with the City Clerk, and it provides a full and detailed description of the improvements and activities to be provided for the 2024/2025 fiscal year and the assessments to be levied upon the businesses within the area for the 2024/2025 fiscal year. The report does not change boundaries or the work program.

3. A public hearing was held, and there was not a majority protest.

4. This action continues the annual assessment first established with the adoption of Monterey City Code section 18-62 in 2004, of 100% surcharge to the business license fee of each business, up to a maximum assessment of $5,000 per business per fiscal year. For businesses classified as professional services, the assessment shall be a 25% surcharge to the business license fee, up to a maximum of $500.

5. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments for the Cannery Row Business Improvement District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 5, Packet Page 82 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE NEW MONTEREY BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT

DISTRICT AND ADOPTING THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENT
FOR THE 2024/2025 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the New Monterey Business Improvement District was established in 1995 with the adoption of Ordinance 3174;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets & Highways Code sections 36533 and 36534, on May 7, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 24-066 C.S., approving the annual report and declaring its intention hold a public hearing on May 21, 2024, to levy and collect assessments in the parking and business improvement area for the New Monterey Business Improvement District;
WHEREAS, improvements and activities include funding various public improvements, administering the business improvement district, and undertaking promotional activities consistent with Parking and Business Improvement Area law of 1989; WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 36523(a), the City Clerk gave notice of the May 21, 2024 public hearing by causing Resolution 24-066 C.S. to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the city not less than seven days before the public hearing. The notice stated that written and oral protests may be made at the hearing; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. It finds the foregoing recitals are true and correct have served, together with the supporting documents, as the basis for the findings and approvals set forth below.

2. It confirms the annual report approved with the adoption of Resolution 24-066 C.S.

This report is on file with the City Clerk, and it provides a full and detailed description of the improvements and activities to be provided for the 2024/2025 fiscal year and Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 6, Packet Page 83 the assessments to be levied upon the businesses within the area for the 2024/2025 fiscal year. The report does not change boundaries or the work program.

3. A public hearing was held, and there was not a majority protest.

4. This action continues the annual assessment first established with the adoption of Ordinance 3174 in 1995, of 25% for each business located within the district, up to a maximum of $250 per business.

5. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments for the New Monterey Business Improvement District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 7, Packet Page 84 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF THE NORTH FREMONT BUSINESS DISTRICT

OF MONTEREY AND ADOPTING THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENT
FOR THE 2024/2025 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the North Fremont Business District of Monterey was established in 2003 as set forth in Monterey City Code section 18-55 et seq. The boundaries of the district are described in City Code section 18-56 and remain unchanged; WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets & Highways Code sections 36533 and 36534, on May 7, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 24-067 C.S., approving the annual report and declaring its intention to hold a public hearing on May 21, 2024 to levy and collect assessments in the parking and business improvement area for the North Fremont Business District; WHEREAS, improvements and activities include promotion, advocacy for increased public transportation opportunities to the North Fremont Business District area, improvement to streetscape appearance, and increasing the overall safety of the area consistent with Parking and Business Improvement Area law of 1989;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 36523(a), the City Clerk gave notice of the May 21, 2024 public hearing by causing Resolution 24-067 C.S. to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the city not less than seven days before the public hearing. The notice stated that written and oral protests may be made at the hearing; and WHEREAS. the City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that:

1. It finds the foregoing recitals are true and correct have served, together with the supporting documents, as the basis for the findings and approvals set forth below.

2. It confirms the annual report approved with the adoption of Resolution 24-067 C.S.

This report is on file with the City Clerk and it provides a full and detailed description Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 8, Packet Page 85 of the improvements and activities to be provided for the 2024/2025 fiscal year and the assessments to be levied upon the businesses within the area for the 2024/2025 fiscal year.

3. A public hearing was held, and there was not a majority protest.

4. This action continues the annual assessment first established with the adoption of City Code section 18-57 in 2003, of 25% for each business located within the district, up to a maximum of $500 per business.

5. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of assessments for the North Fremont Business Improvement District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 11., Item Page 9, Packet Page 86 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Alan Haffa, Councilmember
Ed Smith, Councilmember
SUBJECT: Councilmember Haffa and Councilmember Smith’s Request to Agendize a Recommendation to Direct City Staff to Budget for a Traffic Safety Study at the Intersection of Skyline Forest Drive and Highway 68 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378, and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION: As provided in the attached request.

VALUE DRIVERS: As provided in the attached request.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City Council’s Governance Policy (Resolution No. 23-131 C.S.) provides:

Agendizing of City Council Items by Individual Councilmembers.

1. A Councilmember may submit an agenda report to the City Clerk’s Office outlining a request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda. This agenda report should, in 350 words or less, describe what, how, and why the matter of business should be considered by the City Council. The City Clerk’s Office will add the item to an upcoming agenda.

2. At the Council Meeting where the request is considered, the Councilmember who submitted the request will deliver a verbal report consistent with the agenda report. This verbal report should not exceed three minutes. The City Council may ask questions pertaining to whether the item should be agendized (e.g., the required amount of staff time, the priority level to be assigned to the item, etc.).

3. Public comment will be received.

4. In deliberating the request, the sole issue to be determined is whether the substantive issue warrants being heard at a future date. A majority vote is not required, instead, the motion will pass with two “yes” votes.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: As provided in the attached request.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 12.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 1, Packet Page 87 №10/24
CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: The Council could choose not to agendize the matter.

DISCUSSION:

At the City Council regular meeting on May 7, 2024, Councilmember Haffa provided a written request to agendize, which is attached as Attachment 1.

At its meeting on May 21, 2024, the City Council will consider whether this item should be added to a future City Council meeting agenda. Consistent with the City Council’s Governance Policy, the Councilmember who submitted the request will deliver a verbal report consistent with the agenda report. This verbal report should not exceed three minutes. The City Council may ask questions pertaining to whether the item should be agendized (e.g., the required amount of staff time, the priority level to be assigned to the item, etc.). Public comment will then be received. In deliberating the request, the sole issue to be determined is whether the substantive issue warrants being heard at a future date. A majority vote is not required, instead, the motion will pass with two “yes” votes.

AH/ES/cbk
Attachments: 1. Request
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 2, Packet Page 88 Councilmember Request to Agendize an Item:

Councilmembers Making Request Alan Haffa and Ed Smith
Agenda Item Recommendation: That the city council direct staff to budget for a traffic safety study at the intersection of Skyline Forest Drive and Highway 68.

Value Drivers:

1. Recognize that public safety is a priority to ensure that our City is safe and welcoming to all, contributing to our economic vitality as a destination City.

2. Respond effectively to neighborhood concerns.

Fiscal Implications: The staff will bring to council a recommendation to build into the 2024-25 budget, funds for a traffic study, with costs shared between the city and TAMC, and with the study conducted by CAL TRANS. Budget cost between $15,000 and $25,000, one time expense.

Discussion:

Neighbors in the Skyline Forest area formed a traffic safety committee several years ago and have been asking the city to address safety concerns at this intersection.

Neighbors have met with CAL TRANS and were told that a study looking at how the intersection could be made more safe would be necessary for CAL TRANS to take any action. This intersection is known to be dangerous and neighbors have shared how there have been many serious accidents there. The study would look at all potential accommodations that could improve safety to see what is most feasible and effective.

Given how many residents use that intersection, and given the clear safety concerns, and given the neighborhood interest in a study to identify solutions, the city council should make sure that this study is budgeted for in the 2024-2025 budget.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 12., Item Page 3, Packet Page 89 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Alan Haffa, Councilmember
Ed Smith, Councilmember
SUBJECT: Councilmember Haffa and Councilmember Smith’s Request to Agendize Consideration of a Request from the Skyline Forest Safety Committee to Authorize Accessing Voter Registration Information for a Survey of Neighborhood Residents on the Safety of the Skyline Forest and Highway 68 Intersection to be Conducted by the Committee (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378, and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION: As provided in the attached request.

VALUE DRIVERS: As provided in the attached request.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City Council’s Governance Policy (Resolution No. 23-131 C.S.) provides:

Agendizing of City Council Items by Individual Councilmembers.

3. Public comment will be received.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: As provided in the attached request.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 1, Packet Page 90 №10/24
on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: The Council could choose not to agendize the matter.

DISCUSSION:

At the City Council regular meeting on May 7, 2024, Councilmember Haffa provided a written request to agendize, which is attached as Attachment 1. The Skyline Forest Safety Committee is an external neighborhood organization that is not a City committee.

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 13., Item Page 3, Packet Page 92 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
Prepared By: Mark Ackermann, Management Analyst
SUBJECT: Approve Selection Committee Recommendation to Issue Storefront Retail Cannabis Business Permits, Contingent Upon Successful Obtainment of a Zone Clearance, to 1) Monterey Responsible and Compliant Retail LLC, 2) Element 7 SF4 LLC, 3) Monterey Pacific Retail Holdings, Inc., and 4) OTC Monterey, LLC; and Establish a Waitlist for the Remaining Four (4) Applicants (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve the Selection Committee’s recommendation to issue Storefront Retail Cannabis Business Permits, after obtaining a zone clearance, to 1) Monterey Responsible and Compliant Retail, 2) Element 7 SF4, 3) Monterey Pacific Retail Holdings, Inc, and 4) Off The Charts Monterey, LLC; and establish a waitlist for the remaining four (4) applicants.

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City’s authority to regulate cannabis stems from the California Constitution’s grant of police powers and the City’s charter, and provisions of the Medicinal and Adult Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (“MAUCRSA”). On December 21, 2021, the City Council directed staff to develop regulations allowing no more than three (3) cannabis retail permits, one (1) each in Downtown, Lighthouse, and Cannery Row. On November 8, 2022, Measure J, the City’s Cannabis Business License Tax, passed with more than 65% of the voters voting in the election approving the measure.

On November 21, 2023, the City Council adopted an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance to allow for four (4) storefront retail cannabis businesses. City Council’s approval of the Selection Committee’s top four (4) applicants will lead to the City’s first storefront retail cannabis businesses.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: Yes.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Based on the voter-approved Cannabis Business License Tax, currently set at 4% of gross receipts from retail businesses, 1% of gross receipts from testing laboratories, and 2% of gross Date: 5/21/2024
Item No.: 14.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 1, Packet Page 93 №10/24
receipts from cannabis distribution and other uses, the City of Monterey’s annual revenue estimate range is between $322,323 and $705,583.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because recovering the City’s cost to regulate cannabis commerce and taxing that commerce to fund general city services does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action, such as appropriating the revenues realized, will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could choose not to approve the Selection Committee’s recommendation; however, this is not recommended because City Code section 7-7.11(d) states, “The top four (4) applicants for storefront retail, and top applicant for nonstorefront retail, based on points, or applicants applying for vacated licenses, are to be approved by the City Council pursuant to Section 7-7.12.”.

DISCUSSION:

Overview
The City received 13 applications for storefront retail cannabis business permits. In Phase 1, SCI Consulting conducted a completion check and determination of eligibility, with all but one (1) application meeting the requirements to move on to the next phase. In Phase 2, the remaining 12 applications were ranked by SCI Consulting and sent to the Selection Committee for review. Following the selection process outlined in the City Code, the top eight (8) applicants continued on to Phase 3 of the selection process.

Phase 3: Selection Committee Rankings
The Selection Committee, comprised of a Council ad-hoc committee of the Mayor and Vice Mayor (and staffed by the City Manager), interviewed the top eight (8) applicants, and chose their top four (4) based on the same criteria used by the City’s consultant, SCI Consulting. The following four (4) applicants are recommended for City Council’s consideration, in ranked order:

1. Monterey Responsible and Compliant Retail LLC

2. Element 7 SF4 LLC

3. Monterey Pacific Retail Holdings, Inc

4. OTC Monterey LLC
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 2, Packet Page 94 №10/24
The following four (4) applicants are recommended for placement on the waitlist, in ranked order:

1. Infinity Assets Monterey LLC

2. Monterey Organic LLC

3. Monterey Retail Group, Inc.

4. Dispo Monterey LLC
Next Steps: Zone Clearance
After the City Council selects the top four businesses, they are required to obtain a zone clearance prior to permit issuance. (City Code sections 7-7.07(c) and 7-7.12(b).) On May 21, 2024, following the approval of the top four (4) applicants, the Community Development Director will conduct a drawing that is open to public view to identify the order by which the top four (4) applicants will choose their preferred zone from the available zone(s). (City Code section 7-707(c).) If any of the top four (4) ranked applicants self-eliminate from the process, the City Manager will invite the next ranked applicant on the waitlist to apply for Council approval.

MA/nr
Attachments: 1. Resolution 1: Monterey Responsible and Compliant Retail LLC

2. Resolution 2: Element 7 SF4 LLC

3. Resolution 3: Monterey Pacific Retail Holdings, Inc.

4. Resolution 4: OTC Monterey LLC

5. Resolution 5: Establishing a Waitilist

6. Resolution 5 Exhibit 1: Waitlist

7. Consultant Application Evaluation Report: Monterey Responsible and Compliant Retail LLC

8. Consultant Application Evaluation Report: Element 7 SF4 LLC

9. Consultant Application Evaluation Report: Monterey Pacific Retail Holdings, Inc.

10. Consultant Application Evaluation Report: OTC Monterey LLC

11. Consultant Application Evaluation Report: Infinity Assets Monterey LLC

12. Consultant Application Evaluation Report: Monterey Organic LLC

13. Consultant Application Evaluation Report: Monterey Retail Group, Inc

14. Consultant Application Evaluation Report: Dispo Monterey LLC Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.org/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 3, Packet Page 95 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

APPROVING SELECTION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO ISSUE A STOREFRONT

RETAIL CANNABIS BUSINESS PERMIT, CONTINGENT UPON SUCCESSFUL

OBTAINMENT OF A ZONE CLEARANCE, TO MONTEREY RESPONSIBLE AND

COMPLIANT RETAIL LLC
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, Measure J, the City’s Cannabis Business License Tax, passed with more than 65% of the voters voting in the election approving the measure, and on November 21, 2023, the City Council adopted an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance to allow for four storefront retail cannabis businesses; WHEREAS, City Code section 7-7.07 (c) stipulates that “A Zone Clearance shall be obtained for retail businesses before the city will issue a cannabis permit”; WHEREAS, a Selection Committee comprised of the Mayor and Vice Mayor interviewed the top eight applicants on May 1, 2024 and May 3, 2024, identified Monterey Responsible and Compliant Retail LLC as one of the top four applicants; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because recovering the City’s cost to regulate cannabis commerce and taxing that commerce to fund general city services does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action, such as appropriating the revenues realized, will be assessed for CEQA applicability;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby approves the Selection Committee’s recommendation to issue a Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 4, Packet Page 96 Storefront Retail Cannabis Business permit, contingent upon successful obtainment of a zone clearance, to Monterey Responsible and Compliant Retail LLC.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 5, Packet Page 97 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

APPROVING SELECTION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO ISSUE A STOREFRONT

RETAIL CANNABIS BUSINESS PERMIT, CONTINGENT UPON SUCCESSFUL OBTAINMENT OF A ZONE CLEARANCE, TO ELEMENT 7 SF4 LLC
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, Measure J, the City’s Cannabis Business License Tax, passed with more than 65% of the voters voting in the election approving the measure, and on November 21, 2023, the City Council adopted an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance to allow for four storefront retail cannabis businesses; WHEREAS, City Code section 7-7.07 (c) stipulates that “A Zone Clearance shall be obtained for retail businesses before the city will issue a cannabis permit”; WHEREAS, a Selection Committee comprised of the Mayor and Vice Mayor interviewed the top eight applicants on May 1, 2024 and May 3, 2024, identified Element 7 SF4 LLC as one of the top four applicants; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby approves the Selection Committee’s recommendation to issue a Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 6, Packet Page 98 Storefront Retail Cannabis Business permit, contingent upon successful obtainment of a zone clearance, to Element 7 SF4 LLC.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 7, Packet Page 99 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

APPROVING SELECTION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO ISSUE A STOREFRONT

RETAIL CANNABIS BUSINESS PERMIT, CONTINGENT UPON SUCCESSFUL

OBTAINMENT OF A ZONE CLEARANCE, TO MONTEREY PACIFIC RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.

WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, Measure J, the City’s Cannabis Business License Tax, passed with more than 65% of the voters voting in the election approving the measure, and on November 21, 2023, the City Council adopted an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance to allow for four storefront retail cannabis businesses; WHEREAS, City Code section 7-7.07 (c) stipulates that “A Zone Clearance shall be obtained for retail businesses before the city will issue a cannabis permit”; WHEREAS, a Selection Committee comprised of the Mayor and Vice Mayor interviewed the top eight applicants on May 1, 2024 and May 3, 2024, identified Monterey Pacific Retail Holdings, Inc. as one of the top four applicants; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby approves the Selection Committee’s recommendation to issue a Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 8, Packet Page 100 Storefront Retail Cannabis Business permit, contingent upon successful obtainment of a zone clearance, to Monterey Pacific Retail Holdings, Inc.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 9, Packet Page 101 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

APPROVING SELECTION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO ISSUE A STOREFRONT

RETAIL CANNABIS BUSINESS PERMIT, CONTINGENT UPON SUCCESSFUL

OBTAINMENT OF A ZONE CLEARANCE, TO OTC MONTEREY LLC
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, Measure J, the City’s Cannabis Business License Tax, passed with more than 65% of the voters voting in the election approving the measure, and on November 21, 2023, the City Council adopted an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance to allow for four storefront retail cannabis businesses; WHEREAS, City Code section 7-7.07 (c) stipulates that “A Zone Clearance shall be obtained for retail businesses before the city will issue a cannabis permit”; WHEREAS, a Selection Committee comprised of the Mayor and Vice Mayor interviewed the top eight applicants on May 1, 2024 and May 3, 2024, identified OTC Monterey LLC as one of the top four applicants; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby approves the Selection Committee’s recommendation to issue a Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 10, Packet Page 102 Storefront Retail Cannabis Business permit, contingent upon successful obtainment of a zone clearance to OTC Monterey LLC.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 11, Packet Page 103 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

APPROVING SELECTION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ESTABLISHING A WAITLIST

FOR STOREFRONT RETAIL CANNABIS BUSINESS PERMITS
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, Measure J, the City’s Cannabis Business License Tax, passed with more than 65% of the voters voting in the election approving the measure, and on November 21, 2023, the City Council adopted an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance to allow for four storefront retail cannabis businesses; WHEREAS, City Code section 7-7.12 (d) stipulates “If the City Council authorizes additional cannabis businesses, or if any of the top four ranked applicants have not exercised a storefront or nonstorefront retail commercial cannabis permit within twelve months after selection, or within eighteen months if the City Manager granted an extension under subsection (h) of this section, the City Manager shall invite the next ranked applicant from the results of the City’s initial screening application process in the applicable license category to apply for City Council approval of a cannabis permit”;
WHEREAS, a Selection Committee comprised of the Mayor and Vice Mayor interviewed the top eight applicants on May 1, 2024 and May 3, 2024, and established a waitlist consisting of the remaining applicants outside of the top four recommended for cannabis business permits; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 12, Packet Page 104

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby approves the Selection Committee’s recommendation establishing a waitlist consisting of the remaining applicants outside of the top four recommended for cannabis business permits, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 1.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 13, Packet Page 105 EXHIBIT 1
Storefront & Non-Storefront Retail Cannabis Business Permit Waitlist Per City Code Section 7-7.12, if the City Council authorizes additional cannabis businesses, or if any of the top four (4) ranked applicants have not exercised a storefront or non-storefront retail commercial cannabis permit within twelve (12) months after selection, or within eighteen (18) months if the City Manager granted an extension under subsection (h) of this section, the City Manager shall invite the next ranked applicant from the results of the City’s initial screening application process in the applicable license category to apply for City Council approval of a cannabis permit; however, the waitlist shall expire on January 1, 2026. Once the waitlist applicant is notified of the right to apply for a vacant permit, the applicant shall secure a permit within the time frame specified in subsection (h) of this section. If the waitlist applicant fails to exercise a cannabis business permit within that time, they are removed from the waitlist.

The waitlist, in ranked order, and as approved by City Council on May 21, 2024 is as follows:

1. Infinity Assets Monterey LLC

2. Monterey Organic LLC

3. Monterey Retail Group Inc.

4. Dispo Monterey LLC
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 14, Packet Page 106

$%&'()*+,-./0%12334)'&*5,&.06782 9:;<= >
"
" ?==;==

99;?<@#

>
"
"A

B
#

CD
A

E

F
GH

C70J'%)/05K0 LMNOPQNNRSPQTUNVTORTQWVQTOQPXQOPRSPOPYZ.&*&+)*+[ &*\]30%&5)*+&40+&44^30%.)550\]%4)'0*J0\%05&)4
'&**&/)J/-J)*0JJ)*5K0_*)50\`5&50J[]%]5K0%/-J)*0JJ )*&J).)4&%4^`5&50%0+-4&50\&'5)a)5^
""

EbHc
Gdefg FC]h*0%Jh)5K <i^0&%J]j'&**&/)J)*\-J5%^0k30%)0*'0l?]jm ]h*0%Jh)5K3%)]%%05&)4'&**&/)J0k30%)0*'0l?]h*0%J h)5K0k30%)0*'0)*`5&50%0+-4&50\&'5)a)5)0J&*\ &'5)a04^)*a]4a0\)*5K0n]*50%0^.-J)'&*\'-45-%&4 J'0*0l?]30%&5)]*&4%05&)44]'&5)]*Jh)5K? &\\)5)]*&44]'&5)]*J5K&55K0^&%0'-%%0*54^\0a04]3)*+ #

bo.]%05K&*p<@]h*0%JK)350&.h)5K 0k30%)0*'0)*q&**&/)J]%`5&50%0+-4&50\&'5)a)5^rims[ <i^0&%J]j'&**&/)J0k30%)0*'0rits[?%05&)4
4]'&5)]*J[h)5K&*&\\)5)]*&4?)*\0a04]3.0*5rits
GHAGH
H

u
"
v
>
"b
C70J'%)/0^]-%
]a0%&44(*]h40\+0]j5K0'&**&/)J)*\-J5%^[)*'4-\)*+
)\0*5)j)'&5)]*]jK]h)*\-J5%^/0J53%&'5)'0J&*\ `5&50%0+-4&5)]*JK&a0/00*)*']%3]%&50\)* 0k)J5)*+63%)]%40+&4/-J)*0JJ0J]-5J)\05K0q)5^]j n]*50%0^
""

EbHG
GwFCxk'035)]*&4
-*\0%J5&*\)*+]j5K0'&**&/)J)*\-J5%^;y%]a)\0J&* 0kK&-J5)a0&*\'].3%0K0*J)a0]a0%a)0h]j)*\-J5%^ /0J53%&'5)'0J&*\J5&50%0+-4&5)]*J[)*'4-\)*+*-&*'0\ )*J)+K5J&*\&\a&*'0\&*&4^J)J;70.]*J5%&50J& J]3K)J5)'&50\-*\0%J5&*\)*+]jK]h%0+-4&5)]*J&%0 )*']%3]%&50\)*5]0k)J5)*+]%3%)]%40+&4/-J)*0JJ0J[ h)5K0k0.34&%^0k&.340J&*\)*z\035K&*&4^J)J;
#

bCxk'035)]*&4ri=sz&334)'&*5\0.]*J5%&50J
0k'035)]*&4(*]h40\+0]j5K0'&**&/)J)*\-J5%^;80J5
3%&'5)'0J[q)5^&*\`5&50%0+-4&5)]*J%0j0%0*'0\ 5K%]-+K]-55K00*5)%0&334)'&5)]* GHAGH
{H|>

B
u

o70J'%)/05K0 )*a]4a0.0*5]j5K0]h*0%JK)350&.)*5K0\&^z5]z\&^ ]30%&5)]*&*\.&*&+0.0*5]j5K03%]3]J0\/-J)*0JJ
""

EbHGw
GcFC}h*0%JK)350&. '].3%)J0\]j~&-%0*q&%30*50%rqx}s[7-J5)*n]]%0 rq}}s[+]%&%a)'rq]..-*)5^~)&)J]*s[$K].&J q-JJ)*Jrq]..-*)5^~)&)J]*sl705&)40\0k34&*&5)]* 3%]a)\0\j]%&44]h*0%J%0+&%\)*+)*a]4a0.0*5h)5K %]40J'40&%4^\0j)*0\l~&-%0*z']%3]%&50\0')J)]*J[ .&*&+)*+5K0'].3&*^J]a0%&44j)*&*'0J[&44]'&5)*+
%0J]-%'0J0jj0'5)a04^[&*\]a0%J00)*+50&.J&*\ 3%]'0JJ0Jl7-J5)*z\0a04]3)*+[).340.0*5)*+[&*\ %0j)*)*+x./&%'J'].34)&*'05%&)*)*+J[3%]+%&.J[ 3]4)')0J[3%]'0\-%0J[&*\50'K*]4]+)0Jl+]%z.&*&+)*+ *0)+K/]%K]]\)*a0J5.0*50jj]%5Jl']44&/]%&5)*+h)5K /-J)*0JJ)*J5)5-5)]*J5]\0J5)+.&5)0%05&)4'&**&/)Jl &'']-*5&/)4)5^]jx./&%'J*0)+K/]%K]]\'].3&5)/)4)5^
GHAGH
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 15, Packet Page 107

!"#$%&'

(

)*+

,-..
/01-
2,
/2
.34
/ !"5

6

(
7

899
-..-91
2-
/:;!*<=><?@"A(

(

B

7

77

DE7
(EFA7
(

G
H
II
J

75
K

7
(E E

A7( I
L7

M
N7

(
(
J

F

I
7I

PA

7( KGQLE K
RKBSA

7DFF5QI
7O
5

7K

I
Q

7I

J
P

#IJP'S

!"#$%&'

(
7

7

<T*TT3<T*TT
4
2/0")T*TT3)T*TT

-
2 U"UV. -..+0/ :)T+

2.4
2/0@
<*UV. -..W;-
/2
."5

(

7

7

(X

8*Y
V
.
,W;-
/2
899
-..-91
2-
/:;!*Z<@"

[

!"#$%'

( E

<*TT3<*TT
U*\,/;;0
/]0-^2_-1V.2
`-

_-
a> ;

-.. 899
-..-91
2-
/:;!*Z<>ZZ'X

(

LD
7

B

P

(

b
7

7

7

Q

Sc

%$7

A7

(

PL

QS

!"#$%' B

E Ld

<*TT3<*TT
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 16, Packet Page 108

!"
# $% !%& '( $%& '!
)
!#*
+

,..
./01234356789665:;3<2=;>=
7?46@ABCDE29?FG7?<H96:;927?44?7:6F27;>F;II69F3?4 F?<<?J37?F23K32LM3<F41H3<N3<K6<2;9LM7?467M?<H F;I:43?<F6H?2?EF;I:?23J46O32P2P6F32LQ796F;9H= G66:3<N7L726I7?<H6<71967H?2?F;<>3H6<23?432LE R6?219673<F41H6F172;I35?J463<K6<2;9LI?<?N6I6<2M
7296?I43<6H;9H69:9;F67767M?<HJ1342=3<F;I:43?<F6 2;;47EI?3<2?3<?<?F23K6?FF;1<23<2P6S?43>;9<3? S?<<?J3789?FG=?<H=89?F67L726I@SS88=T629FD?<H 43<G32O32P89665>;996?4=23I6H?2?6UFP?<N6E63NP2 ABC4;F?23;<7M729?26N3F?44L:4?F6H>;9F172;I69>4;O ?<H7?>62LEC19K6344?<F6F?I69?7O344J63<72?446H>;9 3H6<232LK693>3F?23;<M?<H646F29;<3F:?LI6<2;:23;<7
O344J6?K?34?J462;96H1F6F?7P29?<7?F23;<7V

0@WXVYDABC<?I6M@WZDH67F93:23;<;>P;O32
3<269?F27O32PT[8\SM@WXVYD];>ABC72?23;<7
.^^_.^^
`a
'b#cde $'!fegg!
!"
& '( $%

h -

,./
.i0I?3<2?3< F;I:96P6<73K696F;9H7;>?44F;II69F3?4F?<<?J37;:69?23;<7>;9?246?7276K6<L6?97E412343562P689665 3<K6<2;9LI?<?N6I6<2?<H:;3<2=;>=7?46@ABCD
7;>2O?96MOP3FP3<26N9?267O32PSS88=T629F2;6<7196 F;I:43?<F6EH673N<?26H?FF;1<2I?<?N69O344;K69766 2P67L726I?<H967;4K6?<LF;I:43?<F6<;23>3F?23;<7 :9;I:24LEj4429?<7?F23;<7964?26H2;F?<<?J37N;;H7
O344J696F;9H6H3<2P629?FG=?<H=29?F67L726IM
3<F41H3<N:?FG?N3<NM7?467M29?<7:;92?23;<M26723<NM?<H H37:;7?4EF;<H1F296N14?93<K6<2;9L96F;<F343?23;<7M O32P3<269<?4:;43F367I?<H?23<N96F;<F343?23;<76K69L 2O;O66G7?<HH?34L>;92P6>3972kXH?L7;>;:69?23;<7E j<L73N<3>3F?<2H37F96:?<F3673<3<K6<2;9LO344J6 96:;926H2;2P6?12P;932367M?<H3<269<?43<K6723N?23;<7 O344J6F;<H1F26H2;?HH9677H37F96:?<F367V

0@WZDH62?346H6U:4?<?23;<:9;K3H6H
l^^_l^^
m

,
h
,

,

-

,.i
.n0I?<?N6327:;3<2=;>=
7?46@ABCD?<H3<K6<2;9LH?2?M>3<?<F3?4H?2?M?<H?1H32 29?3472P9;1NP?F;IJ3<?23;<;>89665?<HC?N6o<2?FF2 7;>2O?96E89665O344P?<H463<K6<2;9LI?<?N6I6<2?<H ABC>1<F23;<7M6<7193<N?FF19?2696F;9H7;>3<K6<2;9L ?<H7?46729?<7?F23;<7E1234356C?N6o<2?FF2>;9>3<?<F3?4 I?<?N6I6<2MF;<<6F23<N32O32P896652;7L<FP9;<356 >3<?<F3?4?<H3<K6<2;9LH?2?3<96?4=23I6EH62?346H :9;F6H1967?<HI?<1?47>;9F?7PP?<H43<NM6<7193<N 6>>6F23K6F?7PI?<?N6I6<2?<HI3<3I353<N937G7
?77;F3?26HO32PF?7P29?<7?F23;<7EF;<H1F27?<<1?4
2P39H=:?92L>3<?<F3?4?1H3272;6<719629?<7:?96<FL?<H 967:;<73J46>3<?<F3?4:9?F23F67M>192P69H6I;<729?23<N 327F;II32I6<22;F;I:43?<F6?<H?FF;1<2?J3432L3< 2P6F?<<?J373<H1729LV

0@WZDS;I:96P6<73K6H67F93:23;<:9;K3H6H
l^^_l^^
p

h,

q,

-

,.n
.r0?::9;U3I?264LstX F172;I697H?34LM3<F96?73<N2;tuY3<L6?9YEY=tY F172;I697:69P;19E

0@WZD6723I?23;<:9;K3H6HE71::;926HJLF46?9
96?7;<3<N?<HI?9G62?<?4L737
l^^_l^^
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 17, Packet Page 109

!"#$%&$%'%()**+,--
.,$+)$*/*0*',%1,2-)#$,3'%3)*/,14,+#-%.%3,'%&1&.
-&3,-/56789/,14.)+,-):&;1)42$,14*<0'%-%() )=')1*%>)4,',,1,-?*%*,1430*'&+)$.))42,3@-&&#* '&4$%>)#0$3A,*%1B4)3%*%&1*<#$&403'*)-)3'%&1 %13-04)*,>,$%)'?&.1&1:#*?3A&,3'%>)&#'%&1* 3&1',%1%1B95C<#$&#&*)4#$&403'-%1)%13-04)*
'&#%3,-*/*02-%1B0,-D*/,14)4%2-)*/;%'A,A%BA)$
)+#A,*%*&195C#$&403'*3&+#,$)4'&'A)%140*'$?
,>)$,B)<EA)#$&403'+%=%*)*'%+,')4'&3&1*%*'&.
3&13)1'$,')*FGHIJ/)4%2-)*FGKIJ/.-&;)$FGHIJ/#$): $&--*FGKIJ/'&#%3,-*FGIJ/*02-%1B0,-D*FHIJ,14&'A)$ FHIJL5$,141,+)*#$&>%4)4L
M
"FNOJ9&+#$)A)1*%>)4)*3$%#'%&1&.#$&403'
-%1)/*0##&$')42?$),*&1%1B,14+,$@)',1,-?*%*
PQQRPQQ
ST

VP!"$)W0%$),*A%##%1B
+,1%.)*',149)$'%.%3,')&.X1,-?*%*F98XJ>%,99EE: Y)'$32).&$)*3A)40-)44)-%>)$?<EA)61>)1'&$?Z 70$3A,*%1BY,1,B)$#)$.&$+*#,3@,B)3&01'*,14 $)3&13%-)*-,2)-*,14;)%BA'*<[A%#+)1'*,$),33)#')4 &1-?40$%1B20*%1)**A&0$*;%'A,4>,13)1&'%3),14 ,$)$)3)%>)4.$&+-%3)1*)44%*'$%20'&$*'A$&0BA 4)*%B1,')4-&,4%1B,$),*&$>)14&$-&22%)*<C)-%>)$? #)$*&11)-,$)>)$%.%)4/,14'$,1*.)$*&330$014)$
*0$>)%--,13)<\)3&$4*&.*A%#+)1'*/%13-04%1B
+,1%.)*'*/98X*/,14%1>&%3)*/,$)+)'%30-&0*-?
+,%1',%1)4.&$*)>)1?),$*,14+,4),33)**%2-)'& $)B0-,'&$*0#&1$)W0)*'%&1&.Y]E\9',B*2).&$) 2)%1B*'&$)4%1,+2%)1'&$3&-4*'&$,B)$&&+* M
"FNOJ3&+#$)A)1*%>)4)*3$%#'%&1'A,',-%B1*
;%'A$)B0-,'%&1*
PQQRPQQ
^^

U _
U

VPV`!"4)-%>)$?#$&3)40$)*
#$&>%4)4:&$4)$#$&3)40$)*/90*'&+)$a,-%4,'%&1Z C)-%>)$?8$4)$b0-.%--+)1'/Y,@%1B'A)C)-%>)$?/[3&#) &.[)$>%3)<G4)-%>)$?>)A%3-)*<*)30$%'?#$&3)40$)* #$&>%4)4.&$>)A%3-)*,14#$&403'*40$%1B4)-%>)$?
M
"FNOJX##-%3,1'#$&#&*)*'&#$&>%4),40-':0*) ,14+)4%3%1,-4)-%>)$?<#$&>%4)*3&+#$)A)1*%>) 4)*3$%#'%&1&.#$&3)40$)* PQQRPQQ
cS

d

Mee f f
_

_

e
_

V`ggJh$)3&B1%()'A) %+#&$',13)&.&1B&%1B3&+#-%,13)'&)1*0$)'A) *,.)'?&.)+#-&?))*,14'A)3&++01%'?<)+#A,*%()* $%B&$&0*'$,%1%1B,14)403,'%&1'&%1*'%--,30-'0$)&. 3&+#-%,13),+&1B%'*'),++)+2)$*<%+#-)+)1',
iE$,%1'A)E$,%1)$i,##$&,3A.&$1);*'&$)&#)1%1B*/
)1*0$%1B'A,',--)+#-&?))*,$);)--:>)$*)4%1 3&+#-%,13)$)W0%$)+)1'*<0'%-%()*'A%$4:#,$'? 3&+#-%,13)*&.';,$).&$*)-.:,04%'%1B,14%13)1'%>%()* *033)**.0-,04%'*'A$&0BA2&10*3&+#)1*,'%&1<&0'-%1) 4)',%-)4&#)$,'%&1,-$)W0%$)+)1'**#)3%.%)42?'A) Y&1')$)?Y01%3%#,-9&4),14#-)4B)'&3&+#-?;%'A 'A)+4%-%B)1'-?<+,%1',%1*,A&-%*'%3,##$&,3A'& 3&+#-%,13)/;%'A4)',%-)4[87*/$)B0-,$,04%'*/,14 &1B&%1B'$,%1%1B*)**%&1*<#$&+#'-?,44$)**,1? PQQRPQQ
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 18, Packet Page 110

!"#$%&

()*
+
, ,-., /
, ,-.0

2.+33-4 2
,
54/, /6
2 4/2
0
474 2/74
.
8//

4..4/9
24 ,:0!);;<;=>"
?@
?

A
B

C BB@@D

'
E

@
?BB@@D

BB@@D
'

BB@@D
A

E

F
'

E
A

!"#$%&

G)HHIG)HH
J)KL40

0 .4/+,.246, ,!464 203, M
31/ !
+,.24/.0
.,33

,2
.M.4
1 2N64,.1

4.M
642L
/.
O
4 /4
!,33+,.241 1.,-34, / 1
4 ! P,-34M, /2L474 /

L,
!4
O/.0
.,3
8//

4..4/9
24 ,:0!);=<;Q>"B

?'R

BB@@D

'UA

A

'
V

A

A

!"#$W&

;)HHI;)HH
X)KL40

0 .4/
/

2 303, 2
0
474 2, N

!4 4
,24/ ./42L43

,2
O

6-4 !
/424
24/
,/Y,
4 20

04 24.

01-3

!L2.<
O<
+,NM

+2L , N
2L4
1 23

,24/+2L 2L4 .,64-13/ !,.2L4
, ,-.-1. 4..O2L4
, ,-.-1. 4..

104.
3N,0

2
O,
-13/ !
8//

4..4/9
24 ,:0!);Q<Z[>"\?

'D

A

A

'
]

S

'B

A

A

'
B

?

;)HHI;)HH
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 19, Packet Page 111

!"#$%&
'"()*%$+,* %-.&-,-/
0%$-&/1$-%$%/10%&$-.
%1023%%&/%4,01%-/00%-32%$&%/
&%,-3%4,01%-$*&-$../5-3.%%&/
&-$-%.%%&/,-2-3&-&/0*,-0,6$&%&
$*-6%$-0$-%*- %3&-&"
76%+,* %-1,&-*%1&-$-%&,..%-
$0-$202$%-0$3&-$-,0&-&$*$-
2%$&--6%%1-6&.0%$- &-&/$&
8%22$&$*%&0-.-6%&,%&$* ,&%&..,*& '**%&&%*5-%$90 ":!;:<=

>?@A@@@A@@@
B C
BD >EAFGHAFIHAJK
JL

>FAE?
AE@H
MBLJ

D
N
D
A
K
A

AJ

ODPK

N
NA
AAA
DLA
AD
N

A

D

H
D

B

DBN
DLN

:"QQR:"QQ
S"()*%0..$0-$2T$-/-6%.1 .*,1%-$-.$&6-6%24,* $&&%-&6$*/U%--%&.5%*--6% %4,)$2%-$&&%-&866$+%)%.%*+3
-6%5-3
'**%&&%*5-%$90 ":<V(W##2%X<=
>?@A@@@A@@@

B A

BN
D

YMZZ[

DDD
D\]
>?@A@@@A@@@BL
B

D^]_`

H

a

N

B
:"QQR:"QQ
5"()*%$0.1$.$-2%$&--6%%3%$&
.0%$-&
'**%&&%*5-%$90 ":<;:b=

HD
HcN
D
B
LBNDLN
:"QQR:"QQ
W"()*%$&6%*,2%.+% 0%$-/
2,* $$$-)%,-2 $3
00&%*&-,-$*10)%1%-&
$*$-1%2%.102%-"
'**%&&%*5-%$90 ":b;:d=

D

AD
a

D

D
J

D
D

A D

BD

D

a
BLJ

JJLcBNcJLD`

He

DDD
JD
:"QQR:"QQ
7-$2
<Q"QQR<Q"QQ

%-5
%,-3(2$9<Q(-&7-$2=
f"%,-3(2$
Cg

D

N

BNO
`
C
N

B

Jc
c
N
N
BD
N
DDO

`Cg

D BDO

N
NNDO
`
'**%&&%*5-%$90 "hf;h!=

J]
^
N
]A\\]
e]A\
[?H
H

?
N

BNO c
N

f"QQRf"QQ
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 20, Packet Page 112

!
"
#$
!"
%&"

(

))**+

*
,*
-.
*

/

0
1- **
2334566537489548:;<=>?@A?BCDEFGFHIJKLMMINNLOILN
PFQQRIINHLRQFNSIJTEUVNUWXUXKIGYQUZIILMMINNPFQQ
RIGLFXHLFXIJLXJGLJIL[LFQLRQIHUL\HSUOFHFINT
]GYQUZIIFJIXHFWFMLHFUXMLOJNPFHSNYIMFWFMWILH\OIN
PFQQRIFNN\IJLXJGLXLVIJGIHFM\QU\NQZT^IZMUXHOUQN
_IQIMHOUXFMLMMINNMUXHOUQ`PFQQFXMQ\JINHOFMHYOUHUMUQN WUOFNN\LXMIaGLXLVIGIXHaLXJOIH\OXaPFHSYOU[FNFUXN
WUOQUNHbIZNLXJHIOGFXLHIJIGYQUZIITcdFNFHUO
YOUMIJ\OINFX[UQ[IQUVVFXVLXJINMUOHFXVaPFHSJFNHFXMH YOUHUMUQNWUOXUXKM\NHUGIOLXJM\NHUGIO[FNFHUONa
IXN\OFXVMUGYQFLXMIPFHSLVIOINHOFMHFUXNLXJNIM\OFHZ GILN\OINTe\NHUGIOIXHOZYOUMIJ\OINFX[UQ[INHOFXVIXH [IOFWFMLHFUXUWLVILXJFJIXHFHZaMUXHOUQQIJLMMINNHU OIHLFQLOILNaLXJLJSIOIXMIHUMFHZOIV\QLHFUXNOIVLOJFXV NLQINLXJNLGYQFXVT]fFHYOUMIJ\OINFXMQ\JIGUXFHUOIJ IfFHNHUYOI[IXH\XL\HSUOFgIJLMMINNc hij48k=l_mnco`JINMOFRINLMMINNMUXHOUQNZNHIGNa
_mnco`MU[IONLQQIXHOZYUFXHNa_mnco`QFGFHIJLMMINN
LOILNa_mnco`YOUMIJ\OINWUOGLXLVFXVLXJMUXHOUQQFXV
[FNFHUONa_mp`\NIUWbIZMLOJLMMINNMUXHOUQNZNHIGa
_mnco`[FNFHUOYOUMIJ\OINLXJQUVJINMOFRIJa_mnco`
[FNFHUORLJVILXJINMUOHYUQFMFIN

qrrsqrr
tu
/

v )--**-+

wvxqyxz{

!#
|}"

&
"

'
!#
'
~!!& ! &!
!

$~
|

"!#

!

&!

'$

$

~!!

&! #

|
! $

#~!!&
"
%
| !

#
'
#%

!
~!!&''
!#

#
!
'

|
'

!

%

!
|

!"& %
"
|$'!
#

%$
~|
!&!
~

#'
%'

#
'$
"
"
$ "

}"
#'

|
#'

|%

"
"
#
"$!'
}"

&$"
"

%
!
! #
''
'

"!

%
"

%! ~

qrrsqrr
+) ,*
, )--**-+

wvxzyxx{#
'$

!!
'

&# !
! '
'
#

!"
&"

"!!

~
! '#
'~!!& !

}"~
|
""| &

!!"! & "$!
'

'%
#

'
%~!!&

&!

"
%
|#
'

"

%

%$~
| "

qrrsqrr
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 21, Packet Page 113

!"#$%&'(
)*

+

&'(
)*

&'(
)*

&',*

--*&'(
)*

./
0!12"334#2250"672#8 9::!2;;2:<!"82!"4=6$/>>?>@A%

C

G

!"#$%&'(
)*JK

&'(
)*LM

&'(
)*

&'(
)*

&'(
)*
E

&'(
)*

O/PQRS/QQ
T/U2 !:;8 !4$24#:!282#8" # 9::!2;;2:<!"82!"4=6$/>@?>VA%

C

W

S/QQRS/QQ
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 22, Packet Page 114

"
!

# $!

#$ #

%&'()(*((+*,
-
"

#!
$
.

/&'*(* 0++1 22(*(0 /11(00(13*(452 &67869:
;

#

<
=>
"! $

#?@
$

?
<
=

A$$ $

#

BBC"

"$D#?E

#

F #G""!

H
!

$

BB"

#!
$#@AF #FA
-I

"

!

" #
#
!

"

$!

$

"
#

J&KKLJ&KK
M&'N,04OP4(0 /11(00(13*(452 &698QK:
C
$

D?R
"

$ "? #
$

?EH

$$#
#
$#
?S!"
"!

$
T"U

?
C
D?@#C

VC
D
A

H?

D# $ "?"

V!

!
$

" I

BIW$
#
$!

BIW
$
!

"
!

BIW !

BIWX

$
J&KKLJ&KK
3&YZ*(O N* /11(00(13*(452 &QK:
RXE;

"

"""H ?X

!" !

H[B "?@

"$D H

\] ?
^

"#A!
D!

D
#!

# U

A
?F

A

_?E

"

A

?
CA

$D!
A$
#
A!

H
D!

J&KKLJ&KK
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 23, Packet Page 115

!"
#

$ !"

%

$ "

&
&

$ "

$ "

%

'()
*+,-+-.,/
.01+0
1,2-33+-1
.012.+0
1-+3
+45,-+
611-++-17,-083
(9:*9;<
=

>
?
@@
A
B&

&
C
&
C
&

B

& &
&

$&

%& $%

&

%$
C?
>
BD

&

>

EF &

G

@%@
BF &
G

&
%$%

&

$
%

>
%B@%@

$
&
%
>

$

B
H%
&I

&

&

&
&>

%
G

@
J%
K

!"L&$ !"

MFNF$ "

"LO
& &

D
&

& C
&
%
P(::QR(::
R(ST35/--U0

0
1V5-+
D

&

%

611-++-17,-083
(9;*9W<
=
%

%

?
%
&BD
F &
J

>
&
%
%
$
&

$

$

&
&

%
B
H%

>

$
%%
%

$&

&

$

BY&

>

&

&%

&

%

&BZ

%&
&%

$

&$

>
BD&

&

>
%%
BA

&
&

&

$
%
% C$
&
%B
H%

>

I &

C>

%

C
&

"
%

$ "
%

C>%&
%$ "

%

[

&
&
P(::QP(::
U,05
P\(]:QR:(::
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 24, Packet Page 116

!
"
"
#
!$ %&' (% )*&%+,
*
-) '(%"
#.)!&%"
#.

)&%!"
#

/").'

/")%&('!).

-
$
0 %&()1
! %"

)!$
!1
-/ () /-!$ /()"
)).

-'(%%
'-
2
3

4546
&(!
"
)
'&1% $
)"7 1
)(% )*&%) '(% )!&%
# &*
'

/")%&('!)8&(!
"
)%&!&'&
)*&%!%

)* %%"
#
'

/")%&('!)9"!$"
!$ % 1") ).% ' "7"
#
)$"1
!)*%&1
"'
) ")!%"/(!&%).

"7 %"
#
%&('!)!&'()!&1 %)8'&1% $
)"7 :(%%
'-
;

# 1
!<

."
7&
7"
#*"

' .& %
!"&
).

'&1
"

' !
1).!$&%&(#$
-! )!
! =")!"
#

&'
!"&
)

>?@AB$&%&(#$. !
"
.

)!%
! #"'

%&7"
C

C

D
E
F

DGHG
I

E
J

KLMNOPQLRSLTUUVPNWXRYMUVWXMZ[OV[NWV
&(!%
'$

$"%"
#&*% )"
!)&*!$ :"!-&*
;&
! % -*&%&
&)"!"&
)

\&%'&1
)
!"&
*&%'&
!"
("
# ('
!"&
.

-&!$ %
'!"&
)
%&&) /-!$
"'

!!$
!
% "
!
!& QLXLZPRRSLV[NWV][O^Z[ONLWX_`[OTUUVPNWXRYMV[NWV 1
&- )
2
3

aa5bc
'&11"!! !&@@d
&'

$"%"
#8

!&
'$" 7 !$")!$%&(#$
%!
%)$")
9"!$
&'

&%#

"0
!"&
).%"&%"!"0"
#% '%("!1
!
**&%!)9"!$"

*"7 e1"
%
"()&*!$ "%
&'
!"&
8
f1/
%'9"

$&)!g&/*
"%).(!"
"0
&'

1 "
.
#
# 9"!$'&11(
"!-
7")&%-/&
%).

7 %
# )&'"

1 "
*&%&(!%
'$8&** %
"!%
"
"
#

'&
!"
("
#
('
!"&
%&#%
1)!&
)(%
)h"

"7 %) 9&%h*&%' 8"1
1 !
1
!&%)$"%&#%
1

%
!"' )$")!&*
'"
"!
! '
% %
7 ' 1
!
9"!$"
!$ '&1

-

>?iA !
"

'!"&

*&%
&'

$"%"
#

&(!%
'$8>?iA@@d
&'

$"% '&11"!1
!.>?A
*(
"
#*&%' %!"*"'
!"&
). #% ).

) '"

"0 )h"

)!%
"
"
#
jCj
IklGF
mDGH
n
!"*-!$
(1/ %&*
1
&- )
!"
"!"

&
"
#.

!$ 1
="1(1
(1/ %&* 1
&- )9$
!$ /()"
))")
!*(

'

'"!-
2
3

bc
n
"!"

)!&$
7

)!
**&*o 1
&- )8!*(

'

'"!-.!$ )!
**")
= '! !&"
'%
) !&
!&!

&*p@ 1
&- )

>?@qrAs&* 1
&- )
!"
"!"

)!
%!(8>?@qrA
s&* 1
&- )
!*(

& %
!"&
.>?A'&11"!1
!!& #%
! %!$

r 1
&- )
ICI
cDGHt F
n
!"*-

&)"!"&
)!& / 1
&-
!!$ %&&) /()"
)).

!$ "%
% )&
)"/"
"!" )
2
3

bc5bj
!
"
% )&
) %&7" *&%

&)"!"&
)"
!"*"

!$ "%
% )&
)"/"
"!" )

>?A'&1% $
)"7 "
!"*"'
!"&
&*

&)"!"&
)

% )&
)"/"
"!" )
C
uDGHv

n
!"*-!$ 9
# )%&7" !&

1
&- )2
3

bj
&** %
)!
%!"
#9
# &*
wioqxy*&%!$
&9 )!e
%
"
#&)"!"&
. =' "
#!$
"7"
#9
# /-1&% !$

wq"!"&

-.f1/
%'
"
!
)!&"
'
( !$ )
-)!

%)"
!$ "%
:&

'!"7 z
%#
"
"
##% 1
!>:zA9"!$!$ {|:} !&
)(%

1
&- )% ' "7 '&1 !"!"7 '&1
)
!"&

>?iA"
!"*"'
!"&
&*9
# )*&%

&)"!"&
)8
>?A9
# ) ~(

!&,!
! 1"
"1(1.>?A'&11"!1
!
jCj
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 25, Packet Page 117

!"#$$%$&$'()*+,- . / .
0- -

-
- -

- .. -
0
. 0

1223$**$243()$3(56 7
89:8;<+/ .

-
-
-

0- -

=> => ? -@-- AB
?C..
-

D
-
0- ..

-
B
-

0
.
C 0

.
/ .

-
0

00 E -
0

B F/
0-

-
0CF0
GBH0 IFGHI

0

/

. 0
JK"3(&7+
0- -.0D
0

C
0- -..

D
0

LMN.0

MMN.0

--

/ .
O

PPQ

PP
9
!"#$$R"&:2(*K3((&5)("&S"!(K($*+T
/
/

0
. -
0
D-
0

1223$**$243()$3(56 7
8U<+F

H00

F0
C-
. -

-

D -

0 -

- -
/
-

E -

0
.
0

--
0

0
-
C
0

0
. 0

/
0
0

C>
D
0
0
--

0

C0

..-
0
V -.
-
-
C
>

C
- 0V -. 0

-
/

CF0
W-/B0-
-
- .0

0- - .

--
O

=>
?@A

0
0
-.
O
JK"3(&7+0
-
00- -
X
PPQX
PP
Y")5!+XP
PPQXP
PP

ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 26, Packet Page 118

!

"#$%&'()*(+,+-
&+../,(*0$,121$.$,*(,&3/#(,1)2%*4)'$%$,*4+'
)32,,$#2&*(5(*($%*62*#$.+,%*'2*$6+7*6$&2,,28(%
8/%(,$%%)32,%*+(,*$1'2*$(,*+*6$&+../,(*042,# (,5+35$.$,*(,3+&23,+,9)'+-(*%:&62'(*283$:5+3/,*$$' +'12,(;2*(+,%
<
==>

@7,$'%A6+.2%
B/%%(,%2,#C1+'D25'(&625$26(%*+'0+-%/))+'*(,1
&+../,(*0(,(*(2*(5$%*6'+/16*6$D+3#$,E*2*$ A6$2*'$F-/*/'$&+../,(*0$,121$.$,*)32,(,5+35$% +,1+(,1&+3328+'2*(+,7(*62B+../,(*0"#5(%+'0
G+2'#F233+&2*$H+-1'+%%'$&$()*%*+2B+../,(*0
C,5$%*.$,*I/,#4+5$'%$$,80*6$"#5(%+'0G+2'#FJ$0
)'(+'(*($%(,&3/#$0+/*6$#/&2*(+,2,#)'$5$,*(+, )'+1'2.%4%/))+'*-+'+'12,(;2*(+,%3(K$G+0%LD('3% B3/8%2,#*6$B+../,(*0I+/,#2*(+,-+'M+,*$'$0
B+/,*042,#(,(*(2*(5$%*+$.)+7$'5/3,$'283$ )+)/32*(+,%%/&62%6+.$3$%%7+.$,2,#%$,(+'%F %*'+,1&+..(*.$,**+5+3/,*$$'(%.2,#&+../,(*0
$,121$.$,*F$,&+/'21$%(*%$.)3+0$$%*+)2'*(&()2*$ (,5+3/,*$$'2&*(5(*($%4)'+5(#(,1/)*+NO6+/'%+-)2(# *(.$+--)$'0$2'-+'*6(%)/')+%$F(.)3$.$,*%52'(+/% &+')+'2*$%+&(23'$%)+,%(8(3(*0(,(*(2*(5$%4(,&3/#(,1 &+../,(*0$#/&2*(+,4%$,(+'+/*'$2&642,# ,$(168+'6++##(%&+/,*)'+1'2.%4*+-/'*6$'%/))+'* 2,#$,121$7(*6*6$3+&23&+../,(*0P

QRS#$%&'()*(+,+-)2%*4)'$%$,*42,#)32,,$# &+../,(*0$,121$.$,*2&*(5(*($%4QRS52'($*0+- $,121$.$,*%*'2*$1($%4QRSC33/%*'2*$%)+%(*(5$2,# $--$&*(5$(.)2&*+,&+../,(*04QRS(#$,*(-($% )2'*,$'%6()%7(*63+&23,+,)'+-(*%4QRS#$%&'(8$%
&+3328+'2*(5$(,(*(2*(5$%4QRS#$.+,%*'2*$%
&+..(*.$,**+3+,19*$'.(,5+35$.$,*4QRS
%6+7&2%$%(,,+52*(5$2,#&'$2*(5$2))'+2&6$%4QRS
&+..(*.$,**++,$9*(.$.+,$*2'0&+..(*.$,*4QRS
&+..(*.$,**+2,,/23.+,$*2'0&+..(*.$,*4QRS
&+..(*.$,**+2,,/23.+,$*2'0&+..(*.$,*T UVW4OOO)$'0$2'

X

?

!<

"#$%&'()*(+,#$*2(3(,1*6$ 2))3(&2,*%Y
<

Z![\! ]Z ![^!_ZZ![

]]\

_Z `abcd`efghijjkld`e<

&+,,$&*(+,*+*6$ &(*0(%#$$)30'++*$#47(*6+7,$'%2,#3$2#$'%6() #$$)30(,5+35$#(,*6$&+../,(*0F(,5+35$.$,* (,&3/#$%&+,*'(8/*(+,%*+&/3*/'232,#$&+,+.(&
5(8'2,&04%/&62%*6$'$%*+'2*(+,+-*6$D+3#$,E*2*$ A6$2*'$Fn.82'&n5$,*%&+3328+'2*$%7(*63+&23 '$1/32*+'%2,#-$%*(523%4(,*$1'2*(,1&2,,28(%%23$%(,*+ 3(5$$5$,*%&+.)3(2,*30FB+../,(*0"#5(%+'0G+2'# &+.)'(%$%(,#(5(#/23%7(*63+,1%*2,#(,1*($%*+*6$ &+../,(*04$,%/'(,1&+../,(*08$,$-(*%23(1,7(*6 3+&23,$$#%F28(3(*0*+%$'5$*6$&(*0(%1'+/,#$#(, &+../,(*0$,121$.$,*43+&23$&+,+.(&%/))+'*42,# 2*'2&K'$&+'#+-%/&&$%%-/3+)$'2*(+,%F-2.(3(2'(*07(*6 *6$&(*0%*$.%-'+.)$'%+,232,#)'+-$%%(+,23 $o)$'($,&$%7(*6(,*6$&+../,(*04(,&3/#(,13(5(,1(, M+,*$'$02,#&+,*'(8/*(,1*+(*%2'*%2,#./%(&%&$,$F (,,+52*(5$8/%(,$%%.+#$3(%*2(3+'$#*+M+,*$'$0p%
/,(q/$&62'2&*$'43$5$'21(,1$,*$'*2(,.$,*4$5$,*%4
2,#2&/%*+.$'9&$,*'(&2))'+2&6FM2'K$*(,1$--+'*%
r
Xr

ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 27, Packet Page 119

!
"#$%&'()*+,

*+,

*+,
-

*+,

./01&2&343$567869:;<=>=>?@<=ABCD?7?9EF
G2H'IH'4HJJ2&#H12KLJK#&M&#J2H'LIH'N NKL&('L3H'NH%NL 0NN%KLLKNO%&3K%&HPJ(/QQRSQQTU)

V

W

-

Y

-

!
"#$%&'()*+Z,

!
[/\\][/\\
^/_$#H2.`L&'KLLGH%3'K%La&JL)b

0NN%KLLKNO%&3K%&HPJ(/QQTSQQcU)

ef

-

f
g

X
h
i
f
g

bj
+
k

h

ljZm
V

V

g
b

ng
j
g
g
j
n

o

V

"#$%&'()*+p,

!
Q\/\\]Q\/\\
q$3H2)^\/\\]^\/\\

"K#3&$'r)"`L3H&'H1&2&34Ps\G$&'3Lq$3H2U
Q/"`L3H&'H12KH'Ntu`&3H12K.`L&'KLLG%H#3&#KL)b

v

0/"3KJL3aK#H''H1&L1`L&'KLLw&223HxK3$ %KN`#K3aK#H%1$'M$$3J%&'3$M#H''H1&L14 %KN`#&'((%KK'a$`LK(HLKy&LL&$'L
0NN%KLLKNO%&3K%&HPJ(/QQzSQsQU)

[/\\][/\\
ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 28, Packet Page 120

!"#$%&'()

*+,-. "#/--$-"%0 !$.-"123#!$4.5.32#$2/#6#30
7-235"-.3!/-#$ 658-8#$39-:"!;- 3<2.
-=2>:6-? !>>#3>-$33!@AA, -"3#7#-8?
>#$#>5>:-" -$32%-!7!$B.#3--6- 3"# #30
%-$-"23#!$?!"#$.326623#!$!7AC 92"%-".?
-3 +D
E88"-..-8F"#3-"#2<:%+GHGBGD&

J
KL

N
!"#$%&'(O)

GP+PP4GP+PP
F+3-:.39- 2$$2/#./5.#$-..Q#6632R-3! -$.5"-39- 2$$2/#.#3"- -#1-.#..!5" -8 7"!> 563#123!".4>2$572 35"-".3923 :"!1#8-.27-Q!"R#$% !$8#3#!$.2$8:20
Q2%-.3!62/!"-".7!"Q!"R:-"7!">-8 E88"-..-8F"#3-"#2<:%+GHSD&

I
T
U

'IITU)

N
!"#$%&'()

V+PP4V+PP
W!326&HP+PP4HP+PP

ATTACHMENT 7
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 29, Packet Page 121

!"#

"

$%&'()*+,-./0%12334)'&*5,&.06782 9:;:: <
=
= >::;::

9?;::@"

<
=
=A

B
"

CD
A

E

F
GH

C70J'%)/05K0 LMNOPQNNRSPQTUNVTORTQWVQTOQPXQOPRSPOPYZ[\P\YOPYZ &*]^30%&5)*+&40+&44_30%.)550]^%4)'0*J0]%05&)4
'&**&/)J/-J)*0JJ)*5K0`*)50]a5&50Jb^%^5K0%/-J)*0JJ )*&J).)4&%4_a5&50%0+-4&50]&'5)c)5_
==

EdHG
Gefg#hiFC^j*0%Jj)5K>? _0&%J^k'&**&/)J)*]-J5%_0l30%)0*'0mn^ko^j*0%J j)5K3%)^%%05&)4'&**&/)J0l30%)0*'0m>^30%&5)^*&4
%05&)44^'&5)^*Jj)5Ko&]])5)^*&44^'&5)^*JJ055^^30* )*>:>om])J5%)/-5)^*&*].&*-k&'5-%)*+'&**&/)J 4^'&5)^*m
"

dCp?@^j*0%JK)30l30%)0*'0j)5Kq&**&/)J
rsntb>?s_0&%J^k'&**&/)J0l30%)0*'0rsntb>%05&)4
4^'&5)^*Jrsnt
uHAGH
H

v
=
w
<
=d
C70J'%)/0_^-%
^c0%&44(*^j40]+0^k5K0'&**&/)J)*]-J5%_b)*'4-])*+
)]0*5)k)'&5)^*^kK^j)*]-J5%_/0J53%&'5)'0J&*] a5&50%0+-4&5)^*JK&c0/00*)*'^%3^%&50])* 0l)J5)*+63%)^%40+&4/-J)*0JJ0J^-5J)]05K0q)5_^k x^*50%0_
==

EdHGe
G
fFCyl'035)^*&4
-*]0%J5&*])*+^k5K0'&**&/)J)*]-J5%_;z%^c)]0J&* 0lK&-J5)c0&*]'^.3%0K0*J)c0^c0%c)0j^k)*]-J5%_ /0J53%&'5)'0J&*]J5&50%0+-4&5)^*Jb)*'4-])*+*-&*'0] )*J)+K5J&*]&]c&*'0]&*&4_J)J;70.^*J5%&50J& J^3K)J5)'&50]-*]0%J5&*])*+^kK^j%0+-4&5)^*J&%0 )*'^%3^%&50])*5^0l)J5)*+^%3%)^%40+&4/-J)*0JJ0Jb j)5K0l0.34&%_0l&.340J&*])*{]035K&*&4_J)J;
"

dCyl'035)^*&4rs:t{&334)'&*5]0.^*J5%&50J
0l'035)^*&4(*^j40]+0^k5K0'&**&/)J)*]-J5%_;80J5
3%&'5)'0Jbq)5_&*]a5&50%0+-4&5)^*J%0k0%0*'0] 5K%^-+K^-55K00*5)%0&334)'&5)^* GHAGH
eH|<

B
v

}70J'%)/05K0 )*c^4c0.0*5^k5K0^j*0%JK)350&.)*5K0]&_{5^{]&_ ^30%&5)^*&*].&*&+0.0*5^k5K03%^3^J0]/-J)*0JJ
==

EdHG~GiFC^j*0%JK)350&. '^.3%)J0]^k^/0%57)c)5^rqytb$^*_&kk^-4 rz&%5*0%60*0%&4x&*&+0%tb%0+x^%0*^r-5%0&'K y*+&+0.0*5tb&*]0JJ)0a)4&'')rz&%5*0%tm/%)0k J-..&%_3%^c)]0]k^%&44^j*0%J%0+&%])*+
)*c^4c0.0*5m^/0%5{^c0%J00&44/-J)*0JJ^30%&5)^*Jm $^*_{c0%J00]&_{5^{]&_^30%&5)^*JbJ5&kk)*+b
/-_)*+b'-J5^.0%J0%c)'0m%0+{.&*&+0J&44
*0)+K/^%K^^]&*]'^..-*)5_0*+&+0.0*53%^+%&.Jm
0JJ)0{%^40*^5'40&%4_]0k)*0]; "

dCrsptJ5%^*+)*c^4c0.0*5^k5K0^j*0%JK)3 50&.;n^ko^j*0%Jj)5K'40&%%^40J]0k)*0])*5K0]&_{ 5^{]&_^30%&5)^*J&*].&*&+0.0*5;^40k^%0JJ)0 *^5'40&%4_]0k)*0] !HAGH
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 30, Packet Page 122

!"!

#$"
$!

%&!"!'
#$

(!"
$)!*
+'

(!$
""
,!#,%
$)%
-$!- %
!
$!

%&!!,()$!"$) ! !%

.

/00

1234536789.$, !

%,

(!"%.
$!

:(!.
%

% !"!

#$"
$!
;<!)=#
:+$)>??+)!#%

%("!'@)A
,$!"@)
!#!(
B%
+
C.$
#
+

%
DD8E
"!'$)=.
.!"
B.$

%F
,$(
$,B,G=BFBH;C'

I!*!!%

%8#
@
!$))!#%<%(+*)# B)#
J)

$+$)>)"E(
#?""+)!#%
E
* ("!'>!#.'

A
,$B)!!#!"E
*

%

(
%.
$%("!'$)A
,$!"J)(

;8
K

(+$)>L?+
>$"%D.
#C!.
$

$
G>DCH*$)
'
$M%(

.

%$
9 $!
;
;<"">)
+
J&J=C(
%.
$+$)"!'
$!"!$)A>EC>

N
)F
$
$,;
O$!$.%%)=
)#!!"=.
GJ

('
$
B$.%H
$D
.#A
,$
>)
(!;C##!*

%9.$,.
%(!'

%
$!

.
#
$

( !(
'+
#.%
(9.
#)

'
$+
%,$

%
#.!
+

%?BPC@

(+
*##

!
-!""$

( !(
'!""%
$)%
$#: >!.

Q

GRSTH89$
,

%P()##,

$
!"!

#$"
$!
!"!'
#$

(
3UUU3UUU

V6UUUUU

Q

WWX

7
3WX

$)%
-$!-%

!
$!
*))'$
%.$
$
$"!$) $ !"$
#

.
!.

#
($)
)!.#%
#.%+
$
'
'.'+
% $!
!"$) "!##!*
(Z

/[X
Y2

/00

12\U7!
$!

#)!."!' ]
'-] '%
#^B.$ !

#*##
!
-$"!' _Z`T
'$!]Z`T '+*$)a-)!.'!
$!
(!"$) '"!'$)B.$Pb
B

!
Q

GRSH ! !%)!.
#(
*$)>$
(.#
$!

3UU3UU
Wc
22

d ef X
g f h5

/00

12\35\V78
$

!
$!#

.$$
$!
%
$"!
$%!!^F,"
$!
!"K!,
.%F"!.$!'SR
.$^ $!
$
,"F*$)

%):.$!'
$! D?B^I!.$!'.
%$)
(!"S
##!*%^?
):%
+.$!'

##!*%
$!$)$
#

.ii-
')

'^'

-$
#!

GRSH):-
!%.9%>$

% B$
$j.'
$
3UU3UU
f

55Q

k
g1

g 7
d X
0

0fl
l

l
ff mnonpqmrostonptnuovwostnuovpmxmnpry
c0

kf
Xgd

55Q

g

d X
0lf
f dX

X
2
k
/00

12\V5\47.$#i$)@N88z
!
$-!"-
#$'
!
##$#
%%

>
#"!

^@N88z
$(
$
'##*$)$) B$
$M@
:

%@
!(
'+J8@N>+
.$!'
$
(
!$

"$*)#
.
(!' #

*$) $
$(.#
$!
^8
)$
""''
)

$ \UU\UU
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 31, Packet Page 123

! !"
"

"!
#

$
!
%&" " ' ()*+,-./012'34
"0154 !

012'346

789:;<:=>?@AB<C;@DEDECFDADCGFDHA<IABJ K+L)MNONKMPQ*+)L--LR,NL-S)L--LR,N T+*SU)KNV,WWRML)X,MYMS ZSS+MNNMS[+,KM+,L\T.8]^_]`a/ "!

#" !
""

! "
b

"
!
" "! ! " ! ! "

cd
"
!

e"

"

"!

'
()*+,-./0154f!!
g8hhig8hh
j8kXML))*U-K,-.N*QKVL+MNONKMPK*RMUNMS K*T+*Y,SMT*,-K*QNLWMSLKLL-SLUS,KK+L,WN *QR*KXT+*SU)KNL-S)LNX ZSS+MNNMS[+,KM+,L\T.8]`a/l

! "
m " n
o# b" p q"

! "!

o
"'
!

n
o #
"! #!
! r
'
()*+,-./0154"! !!
g8hhig8hh
s8kXM-UPRM+*Q)UNK*PM+NK*RMNM+YMSTM+
X*U+tTM+SLO
ZSS+MNNMS[+,KM+,L\T.8]`_]ua/!! f"%22
"
3e32
" !

()*+,-./
0154"!

!! #
"
g8hhig8hh
v8kXMT+*T*NMST+*SU)KW,-Mt,-)WUS,-.R+L-S -LPMNtK*RMN*WSLKKXMRUN,-MNNL-S MNK,PLKMKXMTM+)M-KL.M*QNLWMN*QQW*VM+ L-SPL-UQL)KU+MST+*SU)KN
ZSS+MNNMS[+,KM+,L\T.8]u_]wa/
#!

#!
! e

!

"e "! #

!
"f" 052x4#053x4 0%2x4! e 053x4!!
053x4 # 03x4'o "! ' ()*+,-./0154!
"
g8hhig8hh
y8z*)LK,*-\NaL-ST+*)MSU+MNQ*++M)M,Y,-.
SMW,YM+,MNSU+,-.RUN,-MNNX*U+N
ZSS+MNNMS[+,KM+,L\T.8]w_{g4|
!
#!" }

l #
"$~ #

! 3e$

"

! e
!
g8hhig8hh
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 32, Packet Page 124

!"#

$%&'()*+,-./

01023445(%3657897:%'(67975(;7'<:7';(%7 4'&%79='7:8)=>67'&2;7?(%57:83)9 4'&9=%@:7%='(@<9='()*@'3):4&'@3@(&) A99'7::79B'(@7'(3C4*1DEFDGH+

I

$%&'()*+,-./

E1NNOE1NN
P1Q&R@?7B3))36(:S=:()7::R(55%&)2&'>@&5&%35
3)9:@3@753R:1$77TTBB?34@7'U8A'@(%57U3:@?7<
47'@3()@&'7@3(57:@365(:?>7)@:()@?7B(@<&2
T&)@7'7<
A99'7::79B'(@7'(3C4*1DGFGDH+

V
V
!

" X

I
IZ

"

[

Y

\]

$%&'()*+,-./

E1NNOE1NN
^1Q&R%3))36(:3)9%3))36(:4'&9=%@:R(5567 @'3%_793)9>&)(@&'79@&4'7;7)@9(;7':(&) A99'7::79B'(@7'(3C4*1GEFGDH+

"

`

[

a
J

b
$%&'()*+,-./

E1NNOE1NN
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 33, Packet Page 125

!" #$%&'()*+(+,-.)/ 0121314'*+5&+(.+*6+,-'7)+,.7&87'968:&'*;4<8( &8)+*).'9,.7&87'9*++,7=>':'?+,8((+)@(*+, &(8,@6)7-8@9,A+7+6@(+9;&9'6+,.*012131B7 C+6@(+,D'7)+E+6+&)'69+-.)/.*F9+:+*)GB77)8('?+ (88:4'66+77.A9+8*9;)8'@)/8(.H+,&+(78**+9=012131 7)'<<6899+6)7)/+(+6+&)'69+'7*++,+,<8(68:&9.'*) ,+7)(@6).8*'))/+.(9.6+*7+,<'6.9.).+7=3'**'A.7-'7)+ .7(+*,+(+,@*@7'A9+'*,@*(+68?*.H'A9+)/(8@?/ 7&+6.'9.H+,&(86+77+74.*69@,.*?78().*?4(+6;69.*?4'*, :.5.*?-.)/8)/+(:')+(.'97 I
%JKLM)/8(8@?/'*,,+)'.9+,,+76(.&).8* &(8N.,+,'*,68:&9.'*)-.)/(+?@9').8*7 OOP OO
Q

R

"
"

#" S$%@7+8<',N'*6+,8,8(
68*)(89)+6/*898?;)8+9.:.*')+8,8(7'*,:'.*)'.*'.( T@'9.);=UV13-.)/6'(A8*<.9)(').8*)/')6(+')+7
*+?').N+'.(&(+77@(+=@7+8<'.(T@'9.);+*/'*6.*?
&9'*)7=,'.9;8,8(.*7&+6).8*7&(8?(':=W'*'?+:+*)
U8)9.*+.7+7)'A9.7/+,<8(68::@*.);:+:A+(7)8 (+&8()'*;68*6+(*7 I
%JKLM)/8(8@?/'*,,+)'.9+,,+76(.&).8* &(8N.,+,='.(<.9)(').8*'*,*+?').N+'.(&(+77@(+ OOP OO
XY
%

[

S"#\$%)8)'9A@,?+)8<@&)8 ]C>^_`a4bc)87)'()'*,9'@*6/=.*69@,+7N'(.8@7 68:&8*+*)77@6/'77.)+-8(d74<.)e8@)687)74+5)+(*'9 -8(d74,+7.?*'*,&(8f+6):'*'?+:+*)47+6@(.);
:+'7@(+74ghC7;7)+:7.:&9+:+*)').8*4A('*,.*?4
7)'().*?.*N+*)8(;4'*,8&+(').*?6'&.)'9=i/+7)'().*? .*N+*)8(;.7&(8f+6)+,')^`c4ccc4-/.9+8&+(').*?
6'&.)'9.77+)')^jc4ccc4-.)/'*',,.).8*'9^`cc4ccc '9986')+,<8(68*).*?+*6;<@*,7 I
%JKM68:&(+/+*7.N+A@,?+)7@&&9+:+*)+,A;
:'(d+)'*'9;7.7=7@<<.6.+*)6'&.)'9
#OOP#OO
kZ

[

#\"#XlZmYYn $%6899+6).N+ <@*,.*?68::.):+*)8<^bc:.99.8*=^`o:.99.8*.* A'*d+,6'7/ I
%JKM,+)'.9+,&(88<8<6'&.)'9.H').8*&(8N.,+,=
<@*,.*?.7<@99;7@<<.6.+*)<8(&(8&87+,A@,?+)
#OOP#OO

#X"##$%,+)'.9+,<.*'*6.'9
&(8f+6).8*7<8()/+<.(7);+'(78<8&+(').8*74
'*).6.&').*?'*'N+('?+687)8<?88,7789,J3h0CM')
acp8<?(8777'9+7,@+)8)/+.(N+().6'9.*)+?(').8*=
'77@:+)/')(+)'.98&+(').8*7-.9968::+*6+.*qL jcjL4-.)/'<.9)+('&&9.+,)8)/+<.(7)a:8*)/78< ?(8-)/'7)/+A@7.*+77[email protected],7'*,76'9+7@&=A(+'d.*?
+N+*'<)+(<8@(:8*)/78<8&+(').8*7=r+;'77@:&).8*7
'*,&(8f+6).8*7sg8&@9').8*4W'(d+)0(8-)/4V+().6'9
2*)+?(').8*4W'(d+).*?t@,?+)74>')''*,2*7.?/)74'*, 0(8-)/ I
%u#$W+).6@98@7'*,,+)'.9+,e;+'(&(8<8(:'
A'6d+,A;:'(d+)'*'9;7.7
#OOP#OO
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 34, Packet Page 126

!"#$%&'()*$+(,-*).*+/*0
1$+)./$23*)4(%%'$5(,6$7),*+&8%'$9&3)&88()&/2$'
5('*$7/1*,&/)$+&/:*+3,78*+;$<)(*+*+;%&'1*)/(+8 3$1%,&)*+;3$+/)'73)*$+:-*).(+&/)*1()&8 3$1%,&)*$+$23$+/)'73)*$+('$7+8=3)$<&'>?>@ A BCDE"F&)*37,$7/(+88&)(*,&8/3.&87,& %'$5*8&863$11*)1&+))$$%&+-*).*+1$+)./

GGH
GG
I
B!GGGH!GGG

A

BA

!G
I
J
KA

BL.&M%%,*3()*$+17/)*+3,78&(
/&37'*)4%,(+%'&%('&8<4(N7(,*2*&8%'$2&//*$+(,O
L.&/&37'*)4%,(+3(+<&%'&%('&8-*).*+P.$7/&/)(22
$'().*'8P%(')4/&37'*)43$+/7,)(+)<7)17/)3,&(',4
8&1$+/)'()&).()*)1&&)/).&N7(,*2*&8%'$2&//*$+(,
/)(+8('8)$'&3&*5&).&(%%'$%'*()&%$*+)/2$'&(3. 3'*)&'*$+*+).*//&3)*$+OL.&M%%,*3(+)17/)(,/$ /7<1*)).&N7(,*2*3()*$+/$2).&%&'/$+C/"%'&%('*+; ).&/&37'*)4)$5&'*24).()).&41&&)).&N7(,*2*&8 %'$2&//*$+(,/)(+8('8/O

QJB3$+)'(3)&8-*).RSR S&37'*)4S&'5*3&/CT$'&4U+;,*/:V*3&+/&WXE@E")$ (//*/)*+8&/*;+*+;/&37'*)4%'$;'(1(+8/)'()&;4 A BCDX"/&37'*)4%,(+8&5&,$%&8<4N7(,*2*&8 ).*'8P%(')4%'$2&//*$+(, KGGHKGG
YZ

A
BM8&/3'*%)*$+$2$%&'()*$+(,
/&37'*)4:*+3,78*+;<7)+$),*1*)&8)$#

A

[

\

QQGJB2(3*,*)4*/8*5*8&8*+)$ ,*1*)&8(33&//('&(/2$'37/)$1&'/7+8&'&1%,$4&& /7%&'5*/*$+(+8'&/)'*3)&8(33&//('&(/(33&//*<,&)$ (7).$'*]&8%&'/$++&,6^&/)'*3)&8'$$1/'&N7*'&^_`a 3('8(33&//(+8.(5&(/&3$+8('45&'*2*3()*$+/4/)&1 5*().&b`c3(1&'(/4/)&1OS*;+(;&1('d/'&/)'*3)&8 ('&(/:-.*,&&1%,$4&&/'&3&*5&%&'/$+(,*]&8/&37'*)4 %(//&/*+8*3()*+;).&*'(33&//,&5&,6,$<<4/&37'&8-*). <7]]P*+2&()7'&/(+8(;&5&'*2*3()*$+*/1(+8()$'46 V$(8*+;(+87+,$(8*+;$23(++(<*/*/(,,$-&8$+,4
87'*+;<7/*+&//.$7'/:(+8/)'*3)%$,*3*&/%'$.*<*)
3$+/71%)*$+$+%'&1*/&/6V*1*)&8(33&//('&(/('& &/)(<,*/.&8).'$7;.%.4/*3(,<(''*&'/:(33&//3$+)'$,/: 3(1&'(/4/)&1/:(+8/*;+(;&6e*/*)$'/('&%'&P (%%'$5&8(+81$+*)$'&8).'$7;.(+*+)&;'()&85*/*)$' 1(+(;&1&+)/4/)&1:&+/7'*+;2(3*,*)4/&37'*)4(+8 3$1%,*(+3&O A BCD?OE"8&/3'*<&/(33&//3$+)'$,/4/)&1/:CD?OE" 3$5&'/(,,&+)'4%$*+)/:CD?OE",*1*)&8(33&//('&(/:
CD?OE"%'$3&87'&/2$'1(+(;*+;(+83$+)'$,,*+;
5*/*)$'/:CDX"7/&$2d&43('8(33&//3$+)'$,/4/)&1:
CD?OE"5*/*)$'%'$3&87'&/(+8,$;8&/3'*<&8:CD?OE"
5*/*)$'<(8;&(+8&/3$')%$,*3*&/
!GGH!GG
fg

QKQYJBM33&//)$3(++(<*/
%'$873)/-*).*+).&2(3*,*)4*/'&/)'*3)&8)$&1%,$4&&/ -*)./%&3*2*39$<'$,&/6`+)&'+(,%$,*3*&/1(+8()&).() !GGH!GG
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 35, Packet Page 127

!"

#

%

&'

(

)*+,-./012345

12345

12345

!"
12345

12345

%

12345

12345

6789:,;)<=>?; 8@@,?==?@6,->?,-:AB/7CDECF5GH

#

%

$
$
$

)*+,-./012345

K

12345

12345

12!5

12!5

12345

$L4
M7NNOM7NN
P7)Q,R?-99:.*??SQ-B;?.> 8@@,?==?@6,->?,-:AB/7CFETNU0V &

$%

"&

J
K

#
W

Y7FNOM7NN
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 36, Packet Page 128

!"#$%&'(
)*+,

&'(
)*,-

&'(
)*-

&'(
)*.

&'(
)*

/(

0

+,

2345 !678 !9$59#6!585#8" # :66!57756;!"85!"9<=$3>?@>AB%

C

-

D
E

FGH

IJK

.

FGH

!"#$%&'0*
N

&'0*

&'0*OPP

Q3??RQ3??
A3S5!"T585!
5U!"8V%

W

:3S! 858"#$7U!! U#6"#$=! =5!8"57 :66!57756;!"85!"9<=$3>AB%

!"#$%&'0*

&'0*

&

YD
*

Z3??RQ3??
[3S\V7"9]^9!!"5!7 :66!57756;!"85!"9<=$3>QB%

_

0

`

A3a?RQ3??
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 37, Packet Page 129

!"#$%

!"'%
&
(

!"'%

!"#$%

)

(
+,-./0

1
2/

344
05504+

678,9:;
<

(&( *

&
&&

=

>

&(&&

=?@AB###CD
?(&
*

( (

''

!$#
###&
%

(

=

&
(

( &

>

&

(

F&

(
*=G&

&

(
F

&

(

!"#$%

F
*
(

!"#$%

!"'%

(&(
!"'%

*

)

H,IIJK,II
L,M
N5
/050O

/PO6
456
4/20

8
8504 O6
42O
56
4
058
5 Q
1 /
05344
05504+

678,9:N9R;

&&
*
A

S

T
U
E
?

( >(
&
>

(
(&

>
( =

(

&

(

*
(&=&

WU@SXYZG[
W
&

(
&
=E

&
(
\

&

((

&
>(
ZA

(

*
V&

(

*
&

!"#$%V(

F

!"#$%

]UZU
!"'%

!"'%VB&

T
&

*

&

>

H,IIJK,II
K,-^81P00_
6 6
4`1

05 T

(
(

&
&

344
05504+

678,9RNab; (

(

((>

(

D@cT(

*
( &

*

&

=U

*

&
(

(

&< >

*

&

Y
(

& (
>

>

>(

*

H,IIJH,II
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 38, Packet Page 130

#
$"#

"#

##
%&'(
)*+,,-.,+,,

/& 0
&'
/' 1%' 23&'& 4(' 56,4 &2%&'(7
6+&'
/' 1%' 23&'& 4('
8#
#

"9:#;"

##<
<
"
;
=
"#;<"
<; <"

;";
>11/22/1?&/'53
+@)A@B7
"#
""

<
"C"##

<
"!

#

<"

#

""CD";
E
F#
#

#
"
#;
G

#

H"

#

#

6,+,,-6,+,,
%&'(
6,+,,-6,+,,

/& I
J'K' 1IL3(ML/ &4(' 5N,4 &2%&'(7
6+J'(O/
PQRSTUVQWXQYZZ[US\]W^RZ[\]R_`T[`S\[
"

D;
E;
a "

"

;

<;8#

VQ]Q_UWWXQ[`S\[b`Tc_`TSQ\]de`TYZZ[US\]W^R[`S\[ #;
>11/22/1?&/'53
+@@A6,67

###;

##f!##
#C""#

##

!;##;ghgif! <
##C###<!";h <
=
j<

#j<"
#C
!

"

"#; " !;C
##j<

"
j< "<
";
";";Ck#;!<! ;#l!## "
#

#"

"

#=
##
CD#

;
#";

!###<!

!!

=

#

#m

l
#
###

"C

lf##

"

#=
##

*+,,-*+,,
N+noLK/pIL3(M//2
q
;"<
#;#

G" "<#;!<""## ;
>11/22/1?&/'53
+6,67
q##;
#
r#;
#"

s#E

q;E

l:E

lt#;
t

uv"

C:";#
w
!##<
"

h;;C8"##
N+,,-N+,,
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 39, Packet Page 131

!"#$%&'
()*

+%&'
()
*

%&)
,

(

-./0123445461"6!7!2!8!46$9

:

;<< 4664<= !84 !>?1#.@A@B@ACD$

!"#$%&)

@.AAE@.AA
C./012344F>#46$9

;<< 4664<= !84 !>?1#.@ACD$

,

,GH
''

,I
J

,

K

L
L

L

M

,GO'P+

G
''

,

,,

!"#$%&)

,

+
%&),

QL
%&)

,

QN

I,,
%&)

,

,

N

I
,,

R.AAER.AA
R./012344S4"4T!86$9

;<< 4664<= !84 !>?1#.@ARD$

,
:

+
U

''V

+('V
U
+

,,,

P

+
G'',

:
:

!"#$%&)

+%&)

%&)
('V

%&)
''V

%&)
:

R.AAER.AA
W./012344X"B<!6
!0!">8!"Y2!
!46$

:

:

;<< 4664<= !84 !>?1#.@AWB@AZD$[U
\

:

+K

^
U

+
U
,

,^+
N

,

!"#$%&)I

_.AAE_.AA
`8>2$_A.AAE_A.AA
ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 40, Packet Page 132

@AB4BBB2,,/23
&+..(*.$,**+3+&23,+,9)'+-(*%C&+3328+'2*$7(*6 52'(+/%3+&23,+,)'+-(*%4(,&3/#(,1*6$D+../,(*0 EFD"-+'G+,*$'$0D+/,*04H$*$'2,%+-I+'$(1,J2'%
F+%*KLL4H$*$'2,%-+'F$2&$42,#G+,*$'$0FMNO
P2%$8233CQ3$.$,*LD2'$%)'+1'2.7(338$+5$'%$$,80
2&+..(**$$+-&+../,(*03$2#$'%*+$,%/'$ 2&&+/,*28(3(*02,#$--$&*(5$,$%%C&+..(*%*+1(5(,1 82&R*6'+/162%*2--5+3/,*$$')'+1'2.4+--$'(,1
.$#(&23&2,,28(%#(%&+/,*)'+1'2.%-+'$3(1(83$ (,#(5(#/23%42#5+&2*(,1-+'&2,,28(%&'(.(,23(;2*(+, '$-+'.*6'+/166+%*(,12,,/23$S)/,1$.$,*&3(,(&4 &+,#/&*(,1)/83(&6$23*6+/*'$2&62,#$#/&2*(+, (,(*(2*(5$%42,#$,121(,1(,&+../,(*0$5$,*%*+ )'+5(#$&'$#(83$&2,,28(%$#/&2*(+,2,#8/(3#32%*(,1 &+,,$&*(+,%(,*6$&+../,(*0T

UVW#$%&'()*(+,+-)2%*4)'$%$,*42,#)32,,$# &+../,(*0$,121$.$,*2&*(5(*($%4UVW52'($*0+- $,121$.$,*%*'2*$1($%4UVWX33/%*'2*$%)+%(*(5$2,# $--$&*(5$(.)2&*+,&+../,(*04UVW(#$,*(-($% )2'*,$'%6()%7(*63+&23,+,)'+-(*%4UVW#$%&'(8$%
&+3328+'2*(5$(,(*(2*(5$%4UVW#$.+,%*'2*$%
&+..(*.$,**+3+,19*$'.(,5+35$.$,*4UVW
%6+7&2%$%(,,+52*(5$2,#&'$2*(5$2))'+2&6$%4UVW
&+..(*.$,**++,$9*(.$.+,$*2'0&+..(*.$,*4UVW
&+..(*.$,**+2,,/23.+,$*2'0&+..(*.$,*4UVW
&+..(*.$,**+2,,/23.+,$*2'0&+..(*.$,*Y @A4BBB)$'0$2'

Z

[

!<

"#$%&'()*(+,#$*2(3(,1*6$ 2))3(&2,*%\
<

]!^_! `] !^a!b]]!^

``_

b] cdefgchijklmmnogch<

pW\#$$)&+,,$&*(+,*+ G+,*$'$04'++*$#(,)$'%+,236(%*+'($%2,#0$2'%+- &+../,(*0$,121$.$,*C(,5+35$#(,*6$3+&23&2,,28(%
#(23+1/$%(,&$BBC6+3(%*(&7$33,$%%9-+&/%$#&2,,28(% #(%)$,%2'0(,G+,*$'$0C&+3328+'2*(5$(,(*(2*(5$%7(*6 *6$&(*02,#+*6$'+)$'2*+'%4%/&62%q+&23r+8I2('% 2,#$#/&2*(+,23)'+1'2.%C6+%*.+,*630D2,,28(%
I2'.$'%G2'R$*%2,#&'$2*$2F+#&2%*2'$27(*6(,*6$ %*+'$43$5$'21(,13+&23*23$,*2,#2**'2&*(,15(%(*+'%C %/%*2(,283$2,#(,&3/%(5$8/%(,$%%4)'(+'(*(;(,13+&23 6('(,12,#&+../,(*0%/))+'*)'+1'2.%C#(5$'%$ )'+#/&*+--$'(,1%2,#.2'R$*(,1%*'2*$1($%C

UVW#$.+,%*'2*$%%*'+,1&+,,$&*(+,*+D(*04
UVW(33/%*'2*$%/,#$'%*2,#(,1+-D(*0&/3*/'$2,#523/$% UVW$S2.)3$%+-%$'5(&$%4)'+#/&*%4+'(,(*(2*(5$%4UVW (,,+52*(5$8/%(,$%%.+#$34UVW$.)62%(;$%
%/%*2(,28(3(*04(,&3/%(5(*042,#%+&(23'$%)+,%(8(3(*0 s
Zs

ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 41, Packet Page 133

!"
#$% $"!&!"

' '$%!(
%)

'
*'%
+''*$%%$',*!)$*!
- (../0..123456789:8;<6;= >?8;:@:ABCD:8:@45E548F>?8;:@:AGHFI?JKC687?8 ;=@::L:A4@:4CMN?KC687OP548C;?@:8?Q4;:48R @:SKQ:84;:;<?KPP:@TI5??@K86;C4;6;CJ=?C:85?J4;6?8M :II:J;6Q:5AR?KU5687;=:=?KC6874Q4654U656;AM
V?99K86;AV=4@4J;:@OW=@?K7=6;C94@L:;687
C;@4;:76:CFUKC68:CCQ6C6?8F48R688?Q4;6Q:686;64;6Q:C 56L:;=:V4884U6CX4@9:@C>4@L:;48RE?RJ4C;M
:8=48J:J?99K86;AJ=4@4J;:@FCKPP?@;5?J45
UKC68:CC:CF48RJ?8;@6UK;:;?;=:?Q:@455;=@6Q687?I
;=:J6;AMY9:@7:8JAE@:P4@:R8:CC48RZ:CP?8C:O
U?4C;C4R6Q:@C:48R:[P:@6:8J:R;:49F68J5KR687
68R6Q6RK45C<6;=U4JL7@?K8RC68:9:@7:8JA@:CP?8C: 48R94847:9:8;M \"]*!
(3^_`a9:;6JK5?KC48RR:;465:RC;@4;:76JP548 P@?Q6R:Rb cddefdd
gh]"
i%!
$%%
*)
$*%j! %3kR:CJ@6P;6?8?I48A
5?J45UKC68:CCP4@;8:@C=6PC?@J?554U?@4;6?8CA?K@
J4884U6CUKC68:CC=4C:C;4U56C=:R?@P548C;? :C;4U56C=<6;=68;=:V6;A +''*$%%$',*!)$*!
- (..10..l23J?996;9:8;;?5?J45
C?K@J68748RJ?99K86;A:8747:9:8;F68;:8R687;? CKPP?@;>?8;:@:ABCC9455UKC68:CC:J?8?9AMJ?9P48A P548C;?C?K@J:94;:@645CFC:@Q6J:CF:mK6P9:8;F48R ;:499:9U:@C5?J455AF<6;=6R:8;6I6:RP4@;8:@C CP488687Q4@6?KC68RKC;@6:CM469C;?P@?9?;:5?J45
U@48RC48RJK5;6Q4;?@C<6;=686;CC;?@:F=67=567=;687
Bn?J455AD@?<8B48RBn?J455AE@?RKJ:RBP@?RKJ;CM<655
4PP?68;4n?J45V?99K86;AY8747:9:8;>4847:@M
76Q687U4JL;?;=:5?J45J?99K86;A4C68;:7@45;?6;C
96CC6?8F:9P=4C6o687686;64;6Q:CCKJ=4CCKPP?@;687
8?8TP@?I6;CF=:5P687R6C4RQ48;47:RP4;6:8;CF48R J?8;@6UK;687;?5?J45UKC68:CC:CM6;C::LC;?94L:4 P?C6;6Q:69P4J;@:74@R5:CC?I;=:?K;J?9:MP@?7@49C
469;?:RKJ4;:J?8CK9:@C4U?K;;=:U:8:I6;C?I5:745
94@6SK484FJ?9U4;;687;=:655:74594@L:;48RI?C;:@687 J?9P5648J:<6;=5?J45@:7K54;6?8C\"]*!
(3^_Ha
W=@?K7=FR:;465:RF48RC;@4;:76JP548P@?Q6R:Rb
.ddde.ddd
p])
3qrddegddd

\$")!]
s3\i%)
!

#!!)-qd]!
)%p])
2
.\i%)
!

'tui!)
#$i%!
$%%*
")!"$%3k R:CJ@6P;6?8?ICKC;4684U5:48R:mK6;4U5:UKC68:CC:C P@4J;6J:CF68J5KR687UK;8?;5696;:R;?O

+\)$ %)j$"

#!%#i%!
$%%v!)
w$)] *$'i"$)j$"
*#]
&]]) *!
)]&"

#!%#
*$'i"!
((*$$
j]i%$(
%$x!%%!]
%
+''*$%%$',*!)$*!
- (.qd0.qq23:8:@7AT:II6J6:8;48R @:8:<4U5:UK65R68794;:@645CFP4@;8:@687<6;=5?J45 UK65R:@CMnYYyP@68J6P5:C7K6R:;=:6@R:Q:5?P9:8;F
68J?@P?@4;687:II6J6:8;567=;687F<4;:@J?8C:@Q4;6?8F
48RCKC;4684U5:94;:@645CMz:@?T{4C;:J:@;6I6J4;6?8UA K;656o687@:JAJ54U5:94;:@645C48R84;6Q:548RCJ4P687M IK:5T:II6J6:8;Q:=6J5:C48R?P;I?@J5:48:8:@7A
P@?7@49C56L:|yD}YYJ?TV=?6J:M:9U@4J:C;=:;@6P5: fddefdd ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 42, Packet Page 134

!"#$%&'(

)*+,-
!.,,", #/
"-, 012!"3-4-21!"1.!5!2/
6,124 ,-2.,!"
547,7!"28,9 :,
2;1-
,<1=95,>
==!2=,"22?@@+
, 2!6!,7>
=!"!=4=9,
,"21#,6"A-!2,,5,
2 !
!2/
#,", 12!"> !"-215512!"6@B
81 #, ->
,2
*C
D77 ,--,7E !2, !1;9#*FGGAFGHC$

J

K

MNNOP

NQNRSTUVWR X

[

S

I

\

!"#$%&](

F^*^^3F^*^^
E*
2,9-28,
1""1.!-.4-!",--_!5521`,2 ,"-4 ,28,
1""1.!-!2 ,
,!0,-!--4
,7 6 =
452!012 -3=1"461
24 , -2812
9 0!7,-16,_ `!"#
"7!2!"-1"791/
_1#,-251. , -6 _ `9, 6 =,7 D77 ,--,7E !2, !1;9#*FGHC$

]]J

Y

I

!"#$%&'(

b*^^3b*^^
c215$ G^*^^3G^*^^

ATTACHMENT 8
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 43, Packet Page 135

!"
#$
%&

()*+,-./01234)56778-+*.90*24:;<6 =>?@A B
"
" CAA?AA

=D?C@E'

B
"
"&

F
'

GH
&

I

J
K%

G;4M+)-349N4 OPQRSTQQUVSTWXQYWRUWTZYTWRTS[TRS\].-./^2*.*/-./^ *._\74)*9-./*84/*88`74)2-994_\)8-+4.M4_)49*-8
+*..*3-M31M-.4MM-.9N4a.-94_b9*94M^\)\9N4)31M-.4MM -.*M-2-8*)8`b9*94)4/18*94_*+9-c-9`
""

I#%

defghiJGj\k>\].4)M
]-9N4l74)-4.+4-.)49*-8+*..*3-MM-.+4CACAm@ \74)*9-\.*8)49*-88\+*9-\.MnCop*8-k\).-*^Co q-MM-MM-77-^-.rN-\s^p189-c*9-\.-.p*8-k\).-*^ _-M9)-319-\.-.p*8-k\).-*mC*__-9-\.*8)49*-88-+4.M4M *]*)_4_op*8-k\).-*^)49*-8orN-\^C+189-c*9-\.o
p*8-k\).-*
'

#tD@E\].4)MN-74l74)-4.+4]-9Np*..*3-M
nujs^CAu`4*)M\k+*..*3-M4l74)-4.+4nujs^@)49*-8
8\+*9-\.Mnujs
v%&K%
%

$
"
w
B
"#
G;4M+)-34`\1)
\c4)*88,.\]84_/4\k9N4+*..*3-M-._1M9)`^-.+81_-./
-_4.9-k-+*9-\.\kN\]-._1M9)`34M97)*+9-+4M*._ b9*94)4/18*9-\.MN*c4344.-.+\)7\)*94_-. 4l-M9-./:7)-\)84/*831M-.4MM4M\19M-_49N4p-9`\k q\.94)4`
""

I#%x
vJGyl+479-\.*8

1._4)M9*._-./\k9N4+*..*3-M-._1M9)`?z)\c-_4M*. 4lN*1M9-c4*._+\27)4N4.M-c4\c4)c-4]\k-._1M9)` 34M97)*+9-+4M*._M9*94)4/18*9-\.M^-.+81_-./.1*.+4_ -.M-/N9M*._*_c*.+4_*.*8`M-M?;42\.M9)*94M* M\7N-M9-+*94_1._4)M9*._-./\kN\])4/18*9-\.M*)4 -.+\)7\)*94_-.9\4l-M9-./\)7)-\)84/*831M-.4MM4M^ ]-9N4l4278*)`4l*2784M*._-.o_479N*.*8`M-M?
'

#Gyl+479-\.*8nuAso*778-+*.9_42\.M9)*94M
4l+479-\.*8,.\]84_/4\k9N4+*..*3-M-._1M9)`?<4M9
7)*+9-+4M^p-9`*._b9*94)4/18*9-\.M)4k4)4.+4_ 9N)\1/N\199N44.9-)4*778-+*9-\. K%&K%
{%|B

F
$

t;4M+)-349N4 -.c\8c424.9\k9N4\].4)MN-794*2-.9N4_*`o9\o_*` \74)*9-\.*._2*.*/424.9\k9N47)\7\M4_31M-.4MM
""

I#%K
KvJG\].4)MN-794*2 +\27)-M4_\k;4c\.}18-*.npyrs^}18-4~4n;-)4+9\)\k 6_2-.-M9)*9-\.s<*)-/`4q+p\`npprs^*._}4kk;*c-
np\221.-9`48*9-\.M~-*-M\.sm_49*-84_M122*)`
7)\c-_4_k\)*88\].4)M)4/*)_-./-.c\8c424.9m;4c\. o_-)4+9\c4)M-/N99\2*.*/424.994*2*._ _47*)924.9Mm}18-4oN12*.)4M\1)+4M^7)\_1+9 7)\+1)424.9^2*),49-./^M9\)4*4M9N49-+m<*)-/`4o
+\27*.`3)*._^7)4MM*._\19)4*+Nm}4kko
)48*9-\.MN-7M]-9N8\+*8+*..*3-M\)/*.-*9-\.M*._ *_c\+*+`/)\17M^\19)4*+N*._+\221.-9`4c4.9M^ +\221.-9`)48*9-\.M*._4_1+*9-\.?
'

#GnuAs4l+479-\.*8-.c\8c424.9\k\].4)MN-7 94*2
K%&K%
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 44, Packet Page 136

!"!

#$"
$!

%&!"!'
#$

(!"
$)!*
+'

(!$
""
,!#,%
$)%
-$!- %
!
$!

%&!!,()$!"$) ! !%

.

/00

123456""-7#

(
8!''!
9
%':
(.!"8
#8$+
;
<$%
'=
,$>
%.
$?@
(-$"
$

@.%$
%

%A''?6""-@
)#!!"B

C!
!'

%@.
9%'
$
$!

D

EFGHIJ$
,

%)()##,

$
$"
$!
!"!'
#$

('
$!
%"!!*
+
'

(+!$
""
K444K444

LM44444

D

NNO

5
KNO

$)%
-$!-%

!
$!
*))'$
%.$
$
$"!$) $ !"$
#

.
!.

#
($)
)!.#%
#.%+
$
'
'.'+
% $!
!"$) "!##!*
(Q

/RO
P2

/00

123S3T5!
$!

#)!."!' U
'-U '%
#?
!
-!
$!

#)!."!'V
'-U
'

%U '-GH '?% $!
!,%%"!!

(

% #!
(

%$
"")%.#
D

EFGI ! !%)!.
#(
*$)8$
(.#
$!

K44K44
NW
22

X YZ O
[ Z \S

/00

123T5C
$

!
$!#

.$$
$!
%!.$%*$)
.]]-

$$'?
^,"
$!
.$#]
(^

.$. !

$
($!?,"
$!
!">!,.%^"!
.$!'GF

%,"
$!
!" )

_
!''
%
$!
"!'%
#.$!'GVF?
$!
$)<$)^

% )

!''
%
$!
"
#

#+
$
(
%($
#
.$!'"#$!%"!
$#
$$)
`;
)<%
+.$!'

##!*%
$!$)$
#

.
%.$'!
$!
(
D

EFH`aI^,"
$!
!
$
$*$)B$
$ (.#
$!
?.$!'.
%$)
(!"G*$) '%
#!''
%
$!

!$
##!*%!
$
#
'-%#,!
#
4b4K44
Z

SSD

c
[1

[ 5
X O
0

0Zd
d

d
ZZ efgfhiejgklgfhlfmgnogklfmgnhepefhjq
W0

cZ
O[X

SSD

[

X O
0dZ
Z XO

O
2
c
/00

123TS3r5.$#] .$

#
,
$!$
<
(

% !
$-!"-
#$'.$)+

%
(
!,
#"!'$)8$s

(?".##

$(
$%*$)sCAt8

%!' #*$)$
$#
*+
!,%
()$!
#$

#%
$

% %!.'
$
(
##
$!"

!
$!
?
.$),

!' )
, !$!"!
,
!.

-#
$%%
$
+
#.%
(
#!%+
$

!$
$!
%$
#+
<
(
(
"!'
$!
+
#

!
$!$$
(.#$+

%'!?
'
'.'!"a .$)7;B$
$!
*##

$
##%+*$).$

'
!$!
%$!
$..$!'"

%
)($`
D

EFH`aI7;B

'+EFGI% $!
!")!*$

$
$*$)sCAt8+EFH`aIu!"7;B$
$!

344344
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 45, Packet Page 137

!!"#
!$!!"#

% $&
'#((")#*$ +$$

$,##-%./01/23456789:9;;<=:6=9>?; :5>@ABCD9E9:;F8:B?BGBCDH;:5@IJFK?6E;;95;@;BL; 5;D8?>5:5>BCBCD6C:5>@A=>C<=:5>@;K56@;<85;9IM;>?= :BF;F6CB:65BCD:N568DNH;:5@>??6O9P65K56FK:
<;:;@:B6C>C<5;K65:BCD6P>CE>C6F>?B;9IQC:;D5>:B6C OB:NBC:;5C>?BCL;C:65EF>C>D;F;C:9E9:;F9?BA; R8:@NB;9:5;>F?BC;96K;5>:B6C9>C<FBCBFBG;9;55659I M;D8?>5>8<B:9>C<@6FK?B>C@;@N;@A9>5;@6C<8@:;< :6F>BC:>BC>@@85>@E>C<5;D8?>:65E@6FK?B>C@;S T #!.4UVWX<;:>B?;<;YK?>C>:B6CK56LB<;< Z[[\Z[[ ]^) &!#!.
'

"&
$ % *#$% #!
($!$&$##(

" )% $&
!$
) +$$

$,##-%./_1`[34R8:@NB;BC:;D5>:;9OB:N BC=N689;>@@68C:BCD96P:O>5;aP>@B?B:>:BCD9;>F?;99F>C>D;F;C:6PPBC>C@B>?:5>C9>@:B6C9>C<D;C;5>:BCD >@@85>:;9:>:;F;C:9I5;>?=:BF;:5>@ABCD6P9>?;9>C< 5;L;C8;a>??6OBCDb8?:85;:6K56<8@;<;:>B?;<5;K65:9 6CPBC>C@B>?K;5P65F>C@;I:5>@A9>C<:5>@;9>??
K56<8@:9P56F9;;<:69>?;:6K5;L;C:<BL;59B6CI
c<<B:B6C>??EaR8:@NB;F>C>D;9@>9N:5>C9>@:B6C9
9;@85;?E:N568DNB:9BC:;D5>:;<K6BC:=6P=9>?;9E9:;FI
M;@65<9a9:65;<;?;@:56CB@>??E6C;C@5EK:;<@?68< 9;5LB@;9aBC@?8<;:5>C9>@:B6CBCP65F>:B6Ca;FK?6E;; 5;DB9:5E<;:>B?9a>C<6:N;5C;@;99>5E<6@8F;C:9 T #!.4UVWXb6FK5;N;C9BL;<;9@5BK:B6CK56LB<;<
Z[[\Z[[
d^)!&
" &

"
*$%
) &e%$

+$$

$,##-%.`[1`Z34>KK56YBF>:;?Efgg=ffg @89:6F;59<>B?EaOB:N>FBCBF8F6Pfgg@89:6F;59 <85BCD9?6O;5K;5B6<9Iff=hf@89:6F;59K;5N685
b6FK5;N;C9BL;@6C:BCD;C@EK?>C9>5;BCK?>@;:6 F>C>D;K;>A@89:6F;5L6?8F;9>C<?6DB9:B@>? >@:BLB:B;9aBC@?8<BCD78B?<BCDF>BC:;C>C@;>C< <;?BL;5B;9 T #!.4UVWX;9:BF>:B6CK56LB<;<I>@@68C:9P65
?6OiK;>AN6859
Z[[\Z[[
j^)% %
$% $&(#!e#!(&$#!."!$ !

e "
($)"&
#!

!$
#
)%!.
(
( '
!$
!&&$% $&

+$$

$,##-%.`Z1`/34L>5B;:E6P75>C<9>C< 9:5>BC96P@>CC>7B9a>9O;??>9>@@;9965B;9>C<>KK>5;?I ;<B7?;6K:B6C9P56FWk<BPP;5;C:75>C<9Ib6C@;C:5>:;9
?BC;6PP;59NBDN?;L;?96P@>CC>7BC6B<9>C<lmba
BC@?8<BCD6B?@>5:5B<D;9a6B?;Y:5>@:9a>C<96?L;C:=?;99 ;Y:5>@:9P56FF8?:BK?;75>C<9IP?6O;5K56<8@:9a6PP;5> FBY6PQC<B@>>C<n>:BL>9:5>BC97>9;<6C@89:6F;5
<;F>C<I@>55E:BC@:85;9a:6KB@>?iK;596C>?@>5; K56<8@:9IP?6O;5UoWSpoqXar>K;9UogSfqXas5;=56??9 UohSfkqXaJ<B7?;9UWkShqXaJY:5>@:9UtSWuqXaH;5@N UhSooqXa7;L;5>D;9USpWqXasB??9USukqXalBC@:85;9 UShqXa:6KB@>?9UShgqX
T #!.4UVWXK56<8@:?BC;;9:BF>:B6C
Z[[\Z[[
vw # !-
3!$% $&
#*#!.
$(#*#
$&#!."&
#!

) &

+$$

$,##-%.``1`x345;@;BL;9PBCB9N;< @>CC>7B9D66<996?;?EP56F?B@;C9;<<B9:5B78:659>C< >8:N65BG;<FB@56789BC;99;9IR;?BL;5B;9>@@;K:;< :N568DN>9;@85;;C:5>C@;aF6CB:65;<7E985L;B??>C@; >C<D8>5<9SQCL;C:65EH>C>D;59BC9K;@:>C<L;5BPE K56<8@:9BC:N;r;C<65n:65>D;M66F:6;C985; @6FK?B>C@;OB:NF>CBP;9:9>C<?>7;?BCDIb6??>765>:B6C OB:N:N;s6?B@;R;K>5:F;C:>C<9;@85B:EK56P;99B6C>?9 ;C985;99;@85;?6><BCDi8C?6><BCDF;:N6<9:6 Z[[\Z[[ ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 46, Packet Page 138

!"#$%&'()*

+,+-.//0# .1023425 "#12420#62"752"6# 2 /"! 248"253$8912"!-62:# 0253.$4 /"!48 ;52 8"#;748"#$%;".$5/!";.;#!$ <44"25524="#;2"#.>/%,?@A?BC&

D

EF

G

D

!"#$%&'()*H

D

I,JJKI,JJ
L,M!N;:2=.$$.1#5O85#$255N#00 !$-!"9;!0! .0
.$45;.;20.N5,22PP==:./;2"Q3<";# 02Q.5;:27
/2";.#$;!"2;.#025;.10#5:92$;5#$;:2=#;7!-
P!$;2"27
<44"25524="#;2"#.>/%,?BA@RC&

ST
'ST*

D)U
ST

)V

W
XS

T

Y

Y

Z
!"#$%['()*

I,JJKI,JJ
\,M!N .$$.1#5.$4 .$$.1#5/"!48 ;5N#0012 ;". ]24.$49!$#;!"24;!/"262$;4#62"5#!$ <44"25524="#;2"#.>/%,@RA@?C&

Z Y

F

H

W

_

`
_

D

!"#$%&'()*

I,JJKI,JJ
a,b:2/"!/!524N.5;29.$.%292$;/0.$3#$ 084#$%
N.5;24#5/!5.00! .;#!$5352 8"#;792.58"253
92;:!45!-"2$42"#$%.00N.5;28$85.102.$4 8$"2 !%$#c.1023.$4;:262$4!"#$ :."%2!-4#5/!5.0 <44"25524="#;2"#.>/%,@@A@QC&

F

F @,JJK@,JJ
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 47, Packet Page 139

"
#$%&'()*+,-.

/01234&%4%536%6%&$%(7&%8489(7%4&3:3(79(;
%6%&)3(3&9736'(5'637238%$97'%(<&%=>3'()
6373$736%(96?9$3(74&%43&7'35%&4@>8'$&')275A%<A
B9;C%&B'72'(9(;%723&@('78%$9736B'72'(723 59=3>@'86'()95723$9((9>'5>@5'(355'<723 $9((9>'5>@5'(355%$$@4'35%(8;94%&7'%(%<9 >@'86'()
D66&35536E&'73&'9F4)0GHAIJK*

M

L

N

O

P

Q

"
#$%&'()*+,-.

G0JJRG0JJ
S0T'(9($35*
D0U&%:'639>@6)37<%&$%(57&@$7'%(C
%43&97'%(5C=9'(73(9($3C$%=43(597'%(%<
3=48%;335C3V@'4=3(7C4&%43&7;83953C
53$@&'7;3V@'4=3(79(6579<<CE'7;<335C
57973<335C@7'8'7;$%575C4&%6@$74@&$29535
9(6%723&9(7'$'49736$%(7'()3($;$%5750
123>@6)37=@5763=%(57&9735@<<'$'3(7
$94'798'(489$37%49;579&7@4$%5759(697
8395772&33=%(725%<%43&97'()$%575C95
B388959635$&'47'%(%<7235%@&$359(6 @535%<<@(65 D66&35536E&'73&'9F4)0IJAIWK*L
+

OX.

L

Y-Z[
\Z]"

L
+^OX.

Y_[-
Z[-"

OX^OX
[L
Y`
a`Z
Zab

L

"
#$%&'()*+,.

I0JJRI0JJ
d0U&%:'634&%%<%<$94'798'e97'%(C'(723<%&= %<6%$@=3(797'%(%<$952%&%723&8'V@'6 955375%(29(6Cf3773&5%<E&36'7%&%723& 3V@':983(7955375B2'$2$9(>3:3&'<'36>;
723E'7;
D66&35536E&'73&'9F4)0IWAgJhUiTT'83jGK*

Ya
bbb
bbb

#$%&'()*+,.

P

I0JJRI0JJ
E0U&%:'6394&%<%&=9<%&978395772&33;39&5
%<%43&97'%(5
D66&35536E&'73&'9F4)0gJAgIK*k

l

L

+
^mQ.
L

c

L

c

Y\
Z--
[]
n
L

L

L

L

l

I0JJRI0JJ
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 48, Packet Page 140

!
"#$%&'()*+,

-

-

.
-
/

0

-
-

1

234%$5&6789#:76;<7=$%>7(&''&'($?7%8@&$'A
&'#<;6&'(8'8%%8@&57$;@<&'&'(8'B
?%$?$976#$'9@%;#@&$'8'6&C?%$57C7'@9
8'68@&C7<&'7=$%#$C?<7@&$'3
D66%79976E%&@7%&8F?(3GHIGJK)-

M
0
--
/

-
N

1
-

O
-

1
"#$%&'()*+,P

-
/

-
LM
M

H3QQRH3QQ
S$@8<)TU3HQRVQ3QQ

"7#@&$'E)"7#;%&@B4<8'FVQ4$&'@9S$@8<K
W3"7#;%&@B4<8')XM
--

10
Y

!
XM

1
-

LM ZM

M
Z-

0

1

M
Y

/
M

--
-

-

!XM
--

1
M
Y

M
-

*
,-

0M
M
0

M
Y

!
D66%79976E%&@7%&8F?(3G[K)

LMO
--M

\
]/

0^
-__`*a O

0
`

X

0
-

0
"#$%&'()*+,

-
10Y

M
Z-

W3QQRW3QQ
b3c?7%8@&$'8<"7#;%&@B)

- -

0
1

d

D3D##799E$'@%$<"B9@7C98'6e&9&@$%#$'@%$<
@$?%757'@;'8;@:$%&f768##7993
D66%79976E%&@7%&8F?(3G[IGUK)O

0

M
.

_

Z

1
M

0

M
.
-

-
0

--
/
/

gh]
0

LM -M

10
0

]
-

/

M
.

0i1

Y
/

gh

1 /

1

-
M1

0k

0/
M

M
/

10lmnoZano

1
]
0

!
"#$%&'()*+!,

*+!,
/

0-
*+!,

*+,

]
0

*+!,/

-

*+!,

1
*+!,/

1

V3QQRV3QQ
p3q'57'@$%B#$'@%$<8'69@$%8(7 D66%79976E%&@7%&8F?(3JQIJWK)k
1
M

/
`

]
X

V3QQRV3QQ
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 49, Packet Page 141

%

&'()*+,-./012

./012

./012

./012

./012

./012

./012

!"
./012

34567)8&9:;<8 5==)<::<=3)*;<)*7>?,4@AB-C

# D

EFG

C
H

&'()*+,-./012

./012

./012

./I2

./I2

./012

0E
J4KKLJ4KK
M4&N)O<*667+'<<PN*?8<+; 5==)<::<=3)*;<)*7>?,4@AQ@RB-C

# D

TUVUWXYZ[\]]^_X`^aabXcXYcdX]ce`^cda^f^cXbU__X[[

g

&'()*+,-./012EF

./012SH E#
./012I

G

J4KKLJ4KK
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 50, Packet Page 142

"#$%&'()*+'(,-%,.)(%+%.+/'. 0))(%**%)1(/+%(/,23-#4567

8
9

:; < ;

;;

8<
=;

;

;

>?@ABC>CDAEFGHIIJKALIMNN

O
;P

;

Q&'(/.-7

R

S

R

;

R;

8
T#UUVT#UU
5#W%(/X%+%(Q%&Y(/+Z7[

;

\

0#W('+%&+/.-*Y(('Y.)/.-3('3%(+/%* 0))(%**%)1(/+%(/,23-#45]4T67

!
^
<O

8

<_

`
<
8

;

;

8

;

^

<
!

;a:8
8 <b

;

;
Q&'(/.-7

R

c

R

;

;

:[

5#UUVT#UU
d#WeZ*/&,fg,((/%(* 0))(%**%)1(/+%(/,23-#4T\h9

;

8

8
<i

!

<9

<j

8

<

;9

<
k
!

8
! <
Q&'(/.-7

;

8

T#UUVT#UU
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 51, Packet Page 143

!"
#!
$%$
$&
#' ()
#!
*
*#$#$*
$#$(

#!+
$
,

%*-
. .
.$*-"

$$/0
!"
#!1
,.'
+.) -
*
)($2*).1#/3
*'
+
!"
#!1
'*+
.
#
%*
#$&$
)1. 2$&-.'.)$&.
2 #! *$&.#) 4

*
1. $/
!( .
%'"'2)&
#$')&.#) 5(
)1
".

., .(4

.
%*1
$*(
'&1
"

!#'%
!"
#!
*+
))-*

#)**
+.'(.
*#
*($
67
89:;<=)$'

,$4#*-'*+
.!&89:;<=
)$'

,$ .'
#.#)%$&89>=
*
*#.'
+.)
!"
#!&89>=
!( .

.
##.#'&89>=.))
$$$
,

!"#$$ + $
??@??
ABC
7D
E
D

D
D

F

CG
'#$)HIJI$'(

%

$*## -
*
*#"*(
,-*
*#
#!(#
.

*%$).
/
*#
*
,*"
#

*
.#)4

*

$.'$/.'
+ %'*#
* *

#!&.'.$.+
$
, )

#*(# .1-( .'
+

$&.#)
.
#.
#.+
!
.#

$#'
#"0*,,%/
.#.!
1
*+
$"

$$"
*(!"+
)*
*#
*
$&. *1
#!-*

. K

$(
+
.#'&.
* $1

#+* +
*#
*

#!
.'
+

$&$'
(
#
L
#!"

&#$(

#!$%$
*
.
*#&.#)'*#)('
#!.
#.
#!.
* $+
%
1*"*(
$
67
89:;<=M!(.
)$K
#

*
.#)4

*
&89:;<=

'#$),%HIJI&89>=' .
%)-
#)
$*#$
,

$;
N
'.#$".
'
+)-( *
#$'*#$
)
)-.'*
$
$('".$.2,($
#$$

$.#).'*

)*MOK "*(
$'(

%
P??@??
Q

ER

S

7 N)$'

*#*-

*%
.
#
#!.#)!#
. $'(

%*
'
$*
*'""%$
'. $.-%*-
*%$

G$.,
$"

(

.
#
#!$.#).
)$-*
.
*%$/T
*%". " .#)$.-%.

L)"
*(!"'*

.#'1
" UIVN$.#).
)$.#)
!( .

.
#
#!*#$.,
$")
**'* $/-*

.
.
#
#!1
"
#W:).%$.#).##(.

-
$"
$/$.-%
.
#
#!
#' ()$$+
1."
&
-

&#.(
. )
$.$
$&
)
'.

!#'
$&.#) (#.("*

L)
#
($
*#$/
.
#
#!*#$'(

%
.$(
$
$('".$"-
+#
*#&

!#'%
$*#$&.#) .''$$'*#
* $&(

L
#!.#
',(*#$&)(
$$3JX '*)$&.#)*"
$.-%5(

#/Y.#.!
#

.
#)
#

!#'%
$*#$&-

+.'(.
*#
*')(
$&-

4
#!(
$"
($.!&.#)'**
)
#.
*# 1
" *'.

!#'%
$*#)
$/'

#. ,.'2!
*(#) '"'2$*#
*%$/
.#.!
1
,
$#*#K$
)(

#!*
.
*#. "*(
$/Z.$"
+#($1
,

*+)).
%/'*#
.'1
"."

)K.
%Z.$"K
#K [
.#$
8ZJ[='*
.#%($
#!.#.

*
)+"
' 67

89>='*

"#$
+
.
#
#!&89>=
)
*#$
.
*#*-

$2$1
"
.$(
$*

!.&89>=
-*

.
.
#
#!\.##(.
-
$"
$.#)$'")( ) )

$
]??@]??
R

]??@???
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 52, Packet Page 144

!"
#
#$
"%!
&'(! )&!*+'&,-
+!
.*!()&#$/*"'&#$/
"&
*
'&"#$

(

0#*/(

0#*
&' )("*/
.
%
1 & ')*2
"!&#

*"%
"2
.0!)*! 0."%! 0)*#!**/

.()&&!(.
3
4

56768
')"
#!*
('2
&!%!*#9!2!
*)&!*+'&*!()&!*"'&
$!'+
(

0#*
&' )("*:')"
#!*
&'"'('
*+'&"&
*+!&&#$
(

0#*
&' )("*;#"%#"%!
&!2#*!*/&!(!#9#$
*%#
2!"*+&'2
#(!*! #*"&#0)"'&*/
!
#9!&#$

&' )("*"'()*"'2!&*:('2
&!%!*#9!<)&&!(.
=

$!2!">

/#9'
9#$+#
(!/'
!&
"#'*/
('2

#
(!"!
2*/"%'&')$%
."!*"!
"!?#*"#$

'(
"#'*

@ABC%'&')$%/ !"
#
! /
*"&
"!$#(

&'9# !
D

D

E
FG

EH IH

J

F K

LMNOPQRMSTMUVVWQOXYSZNVWXYN[\PW\OXW
')"&!
(%
%#&#$'+&!*# !"*'+"%!<#".'+
='"!&!.+'&'
!
'*#"#'*
]'&('2
!*
"#' +'&('"#)#$! )(
"#'/

.'"%!&
("#'*

&'
'*! 0."%!

#(
""%
"
&!#"! ! "' RMYM[QSSTMW\OXW^\P_[\POMXY`a\PUVVWQOXYSZNW\OXW !2

'.!!*
3
4

68
('22#"2!""'b
'(

;'&c+'&(!+&'2<#".:#+'"+!
*#0
!/
&#'&#"#1! ='"!&!.<')".&!*# !"*:-"&
"!$.,-%#+"
!?
!&#!(! 2

$!&*"'!;*"'&!*+'&"&
##$:
"&
*#"#'"!2
'&
&.2

$!&*
*
'(

*$
# ('+# !(!:d0e!("#9!,f*"
0 #*%*c#

!
'(

;'&c+'&(!/
0!!+#"#$"%!(#".

&'2'"#$;'&cg
#+!0

(!:
h!(&)#"2!"-"&
"!$.,>

"+'&2*,i"#
#1!j !! /
<&
#$*
#*"/k#
h!(&)#"!&+'&e'0
'*"#$*:j(!"#9!*,
d++!&&'0)*"0!!+#"*/('"#)#$! )(
"#' '

'&")#"#!*:j"!&

>&'2'"#',f(')&
$!#"!&

*"
++
&'2'"#':<
!
&f?
!("
"#'*,l&#"!!$
$#$
e'0
*')"
##$m
'(

*'
.m&!n)#&!2!"*:o'(

d)"&!
(%,<' )("!#$%0'&%'' ;

c"%&')$%*/
#*"&#0)"!e'0&!(&)#"2!"+
.!&*p

@AqB !"
#
!
("#'

+'&
'(

%#&#$
')"&!
(%:@AqBb
'(

%#&!('22#"2!"/@AB
('"#)#$! )(
"#'$&
"*@
$prpB
8D8
JstHG
uEH I
j !"#+."%!)20!&'+
!2

'.!!*
"##"#

'
!#$/
"%!2
?#2)2 )20!&'+!2

'.!!*;%!"%!0)*#!**#*
"+)

(

(#".
3
4

6v
-"
&")
,f*"#2
"!qw !2

'.!!*/#(
) #$&!(!
"#'#*"*/*

!*
&!
&!*!"
"#9!*/#9!"'&.2

$!&*/n)

#".('"&'

*
!(#

#*"*/

&'()&!2!"
**'(#
"!*:>'*"g-"
&")
,
#"#'

w!2

'.!!*gx"'"

@ApwBy'+!2

'.!!*
"##"#

*"
&")
:@ApwB
y'+!2

'.!!*
"+)

'
!&
"#'/@AB('22#"2!""' $&!
"!&"%
w!2

'.!!*
JDJ
zEH I{
G
j !"#+.

'*#"#'*"' 0!!2

'.!
""%!
&'
'*! 0)*#!**/
"%!#&
&!*
'*#0#
#"#!*
3
4

6v765
!"
#
! &!*
'*!
&'9# ! +'&

'*#"#'*# !"#+#!
"%!#&
&!*
'*#0#
#"#!*

@AB('2
&!%!*#9!# !"#+#(
"#''+

'*#"#'*
&!*
'*#0#
#"#!*
D
|EH I}
j !"#+."%!;
$!*
&'9# ! "'

'.!!*3
4

66
*"
&"#$2##2)2*

&.'+
~qx
!&%')&/!?(!! #$"%!*"
"!*2##2)2;
$!0.
xb
*)&

**#$"%!='"!&!.<')".
#9#$;
$! 8D8
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 53, Packet Page 145

!
"#$%&'()
*! +

,

*!,

-.

/
*!

,

-0

1
2

/
*!

1

2

345678$9::;:':<&=>)?+

2 +
+

/2

/
+
+

2
/

+

@AA%:>>:AB%&=:%&CD7(4EFGFHI)J

1

J

KL
KM
?

!

+

P +
/,

R

+S

T
R

U

N/OOO

!
M

L

U +K.

VT
WX

T

Q

Y
2
L1

U + X

J
S

2

L,

,

Y
U

YUQ!,
ZP1[Y
\
"#$%&'()
*!

2 +
+

/
*!

NO

*!++

+OO

]4HH^34HH
_45678$9::`$'GA&>#%&6&'C=&$'a$8&#&:>)L

,
,

+

@AA%:>>:AB%&=:%&CD7(4FbGFcI)
-

+
+

MMW,R

/
+ 2

/
+

1
R

+ R

M-W

Q+2

,
+

d

+

"#$%&'()
*!1

2
+

2 +
+
c4HH^c4HH
e$=C8)bF4HH^cH4HH

":#=&$'f)g$#C85'=:%7%&>:C'A5'(C(:6:'=a8C'DhHa$&'=>e$=C8I b4B$66i'&=95'(C(:6:'=)Q+

+
2

+

,

/
+
22

K

d

@AA%:>>:AB%&=:%&CD7(4FhGFEI)Q

1 1

NO/OOO/,

2

2
/

d
/

+
k

2

+

1 T

T

+1
S
+, 2

+

+

+M

,
Y
l
U

+

1

+,

0
1
+m
L2 U

+
2

+
n

,
Y
l
U
.

+M2

+Q
2
1 2
M

bH4HH^bH4HH
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 54, Packet Page 146

!"!#$
% #&

'()*+
),-./!01234)5.
6

7
8

9:9;<9

:

:=
9;

;;

:

=
>=?

;;

:8;
7@
9

:

9 :

;;
;

7

A
BBC

D
=

=
E
F

GHIJKLMN>C?

;;

:
AA;

@

>C?@
:

AA;
A

>C?E

@

@
;

;;

:
>C?

>C?
F

F

@

@
>C?;

;;
;

A ;

>C?

O

@
@

@

>C?

;;
;

;;

:
;;
;

>C?

;;
;

;

:
;;
;

>C?

;;
;

;

:
;;
;
P QB
RRR:
STUIVVWLKXYZ[KMLV\LXN]

A

ZTUILL\HXKILXIX^\UKXY_`aK[KXYXIb\Jc\X^\ UKXY_d`VK[K`JKXYeKX^X^\UKXY_`Lf KLLIc`XKc\aWbKL\bbVIf\[bHILbKbX\LXeKX^ ghijkglmnopqqrskglZffJ\bb\fUJKX\JK`tuMTvvwxyz{N|}@ ~

:
;

A

@

;;

F
:

;
@

;

;F

;;

@
:A

@
@F

;

;;

:

AA;

:

@

@
A

;;

:
A;

@

F

:

;

OFF

;

:

;

O
A

;

GHIJKLMN>C?;

:

>C?

A

:

@

>C?;

@

@
>C?

@
@F

;

>C?;

@
:

:
TyyTyy
T
kkglgpopspqkghghijkglmnisi
[`L_`LY`uu[KH`a[\bu\HKdKHu[`Lb_`Lf f\bKMLbX`Lf`Jfb ZffJ\bb\fUJKX\JK`tuMTxyzwxx{N
A

;
;

:

A O

@

:
@

:

AF

@
@

9

: 9

;
:

:O

A
9

:~
A
]
O

;

:
;;
;

A

TyyTyy
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 55, Packet Page 147

!"#$%&'()*+,

-
./0"!12345$%65571#8%6#59$:5;<

=
>??#6556?@#$86#$1A:&/BBCD;

=E

F

'<-
-
-H-,-

I =

,
=

=J

K LI

M G(LIM+E

=
N

K -(E=N
+
!"#$%&;()O+,

-
BP/PPQBP/PP
R"812;.P/PPQ.P/PP

6!8$"%S; 4581$%1T$2$8UAVP7"$%85R"812D
B/ 4581$%1T261%?WX4$81T26345$%6557#1!8$!65;<

'

>/ 86:5896!1%%1T$5T45$%655Z$2281[68" #6?4!6896!1#T"%\""8:#$%8"\!1%%1T$5TU #6?4!$%&&#66%9"456&156]$55$"%5
>??#6556?@#$86#$1A:&/BB^_BB`D;H
H

,

L

HN

aI<=

*Oc

!"#$%&;()*+

C/PPQC/PP
ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 56, Packet Page 148

!#

$
%
&

''("')*$+,-../01.23/45/ 1266-7-.-4829274:-;-;<=>>?@/34-9-@:4-2;92345/3/4:-. 6423/A@2BB-44/C42-;@23123:4-;<:B-;-BDB 1/3@/;4:</292;E6-4//./@43-@-48</;/3:4-2;4532D<5 45/-;64:..:4-2;293/;/,:7.//;/3<862D3@/66D@5:6

62.:31:;/.6A-;64:..:4-2;29/./@43-@F/5-@./G>HI
@5:3</36A-;64:..67-J/3:@J6A23<:;-@3/@[email protected];<A
/./@432;-@,:64/3/@[email protected];<AK:4/3L6:</M/CD@4-2;:;C N-3>B-66-2;6AO423B,:4/3P2..D4-2;Q2;432.6A 1:34-@-1:4-;<-;Q/;43:.Q2:64Q2BBD;-48>;/3<8GRQ>I
:6-4613/9/33/C/;/3<8132F-C/3
S

+GTUI45232D<5VC/4:-./CV:;C643:4/<-@
B/;4-2;29/;/3<8@2;6/3F:4-2;236D64:-;:7-.-48
9/:4D3/6
'***'***
&S

W
X

W

W
X

%
&

')*"')'$+643-;</;4@3-4/3-:923
6D11.-/36V@2;CD@4-;<3/<D.:3:DC-4642F/3-98
@2B1.-:;@/,-456:9/48:;C.:72364:;C:3C6V:;C 13-23-4-Y-;<1:34;/365-16,-456D11.-/36@2BB-44/C42 /45-@:..:72313:@4-@/6AO4/166D@5:6F/44-;<6D11.-/36V /B15:6-Y-;<9:-3@2B1/;6:4-2;:;C6:9/,23J-;<
@2;C-4-2;6V:;C9264/3-;<:6D11.8@5:-;45:4132B24/6 ,23J/3,/..E7/-;<3/9./@4QD.4D3/Z6@2BB-4B/;442 3/612;6-7./62D3@-;<[ S

+GT\I45232D<5VC/4:-./CV:;C643:4/<-@B/;4-2; 2964/162952,4262D3@/132CD@46A@./:3 -B1./B/;4:4-2;1.:;6:;C6D@@/66B/43-@6
]**]**
^+ )***)***

ATTACHMENT 9
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 57, Packet Page 149

!"

#$$%
&

'()*+,-./0123(45667,*)-8/)139:;5 <=>?? @
A
A B??>??

<C>=?D&

@
A
AE

F
&

GH
E

I

J
%

G:3L*(,238M3 NOPQRSPPTURSVWPXVQTVSYXSVQSRZSQRTURQR[\]^R^[QR[\ )-_`63()8,-.)73.)77a63(1,883_`(7,*3-L3_(38),7
*)--)2,L20L,-3LL,-8M3b-,83_c8)83Ld`(`8M3(20L,-3LL ,-)L,1,7)(7ac8)83(3.07)83_)*8,e,8a
AA

If%
ghijklJG`m-3(Lm,8Mn=o a3)(L`p*`12,-3_*)--)2,L,-_0L8(a3q63(,3-*3r=`ps `m-3(Lm,8M6(,`((38),7*)--)2,L3q63(,3-*3r`m-3(L m,8M3q63(,3-*3,-c8)83(3.07)83_)*8,e,8,3Lrt `63()8,`-)7(38),77`*)8,`-L,-u)7,p`(-,)m,8MC )__,8,`-)77`*)8,`-L8M)88M3a)(3*0((3-87a_3e37`6,-.r )-8,*,6)83L)1)LL,-.n?o`63()8,`-)77,*3-L3_*)--)2,L 20L,-3LL3L,-u)7,p`(-,)8M33-_`pB?Bvr*`07_23 `63()8,-.,-)L1)-a)LL8)83L2a8M33-_`pB?Bv &

fGwovx1`(38M)-C=D`m-3(LM,683)1m,8M 3q63(,3-*3,-u)--)2,L`(c8)83(3.07)83_)*8,e,8adn=o a3)(L`p*)--)2,L3q63(,3-*3wonxdt(38),77`*)8,`-Ld m,8M)-)__,8,`-)7C,-_3e37`613-8wonx
%E %
%

y
A
z
@
Af
G:3L*(,23a`0(
`e3()77+-`m73_.3`p8M3*)--)2,L,-_0L8(ad,-*70_,-.
,_3-8,p,*)8,`-`pM`m,-_0L8(a23L86()*8,*3L)-_ c8)83(3.07)8,`-LM)e3233-,-*`(6`()83_,- 3q,L8,-.96(,`(73.)720L,-3LL3L`08L,_38M3u,8a`p {`-83(3a
AA

If%g
lJG|q*368,`-)7
0-_3(L8)-_,-.`p8M3*)--)2,L,-_0L8(a>}(`e,_3L)- 3qM)0L8,e3)-_*`16(3M3-L,e3`e3(e,3m`p,-_0L8(a 23L86()*8,*3L)-_L8)83(3.07)8,`-Ld,-*70_,-.-0)-*3_ ,-L,.M8L)-_)_e)-*3_)-)7aL,L>:31`-L8()83L) L`6M,L8,*)83_0-_3(L8)-_,-.`pM`m(3.07)8,`-L)(3 ,-*`(6`()83_,-8`3q,L8,-.`(6(,`(73.)720L,-3LL3Ld m,8M3q3167)(a3q)1673L)-_,-~_368M)-)7aL,L>
&

fG|q*368,`-)7wo?x~)667,*)-8_31`-L8()83L
3q*368,`-)7+-`m73_.3`p8M3*)--)2,L,-_0L8(a>;3L8
6()*8,*3Ldu,8a)-_c8)83(3.07)8,`-L(3p3(3-*3_ 8M(`0.M`088M33-8,(3)667,*)8,`- %E %
%"@

F
y

:3L*(,238M3 ,-e`7e313-8`p8M3`m-3(LM,683)1,-8M3_)a~8`~_)a `63()8,`-)-_1)-).313-8`p8M36(`6`L3_20L,-3LL
AA

If%
JGm-3(LM,683)1 *`16(,L3_`p/`(1)-`0L,pwu|xd:)(7,-3`0L,p wuxdc3)-{)__`*+Lwuuxd5-8M`-a
`-)73L
wuxd5_)1{3(-,8wu:xd:,`--32)(()wu`110-,8a
5_e,L`(xr:38),73_3q67)-)8,`-6(`e,_3_p`()77`m-3(L (3.)(_,-.,-e`7e313-8m,8M(`73L*73)(7a_3p,-3_r
/`(1)-`e3(L33L8M33-8,(3`63()8,`-d3-L0(,-.
*`167,)-*3)-_3pp3*8,e320L,-3LL1)-).313-8d
6(`e,_3L73)_3(LM,6d1),-8),-L_`*013-8)8,`-m,8M 8M3u,8a)-_c8)83d*``(_,-)83L20L,-3LL_3e37`613-8d )-_)667,3LM,L(3)73L8)832)*+.(`0-_8`3-L0(3 -3,.M2`(M``_*`16)8,2,7,8ar/`(1)-)7L`1)-).3L %E %
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 58, Packet Page 150

!
"#$%&'()*+,-.

/01%$2344&$'5673%8&2&#58&$'49:%5&'&'()

;

<
<

;

=>>%3443>7%&83%&5?@(0ABCDEF)G

H
<

LM

N
OPL

<

"#$%&'()*+,-.

AE0EE9AE0EE
:$856)/E0EE9/E0EE

"3#8&$'Q)QR4&'344165'?/E1$&'84:$856F
A0QR4&'344S@3%58&$'4)

<
<

I

=0T$R%4$2S@3%58&$' =>>%3443>7%&83%&5?@(0DEF)

U<U
"#$%&'()*+,.

V

A0EE9A0EE
Q0W25@@6&#5X63Y8Z37R48$[3%#Z3#\C&'@%$#344 =>>%3443>7%&83%&5?@(0DECD]F)

^
_

;

V

A0EE9A0EE
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 59, Packet Page 151

!
"

#

$

#

&
'()*+,-./012%

#

456789)+,:;)<;'=>8?@?:8AB+,(>CD+,-,=A8E
:)F8C?8D=,D7)G+:G+>>+,:8*=(:G+:7:78 HIJIKLHMJNOJIKOIPJQRJNOIPJQKHSHIKMT UD8,:+<@:78,CAF8*)<9)+,:;)<;'=>8?
:8*A+,=>?:)F8C?8DG78,:78FC?+,8??+?
=:<C>>(=V=(+:@
WDD*8??8D4*+:8*+=BV-5XY;XZE.

$
[\#

$
[\#

\
"

&
[\#

$

\]

'()*+,-./0^&_2[\#
/012

`]!
/0^&_2a
[\#

X5bbcX5bb
d5efgQfMhijJNQKgjIkIkKHIJIKLHIPJQRJNO :*=(8?@?:8A<)*(=,,=F+?=,D(=,,=F+? V*)DC(:?G+>>F8=(7+8l8D WDD*8??8D4*+:8*+=BV-5XZ;XmE.
$
[\#

n

[\#

[

#pq

[\#

r5bbcr5bb
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 60, Packet Page 152

!
"#$%&'()*+,- .

/01234##$5'6&'(7$8694%37:763;6$<3573= 6$>%$?&=3>$&'6$874@3=4644'=45=&66%4&@7 $8<$62>%$=5#674'=#472 A==%3773=B%&63%&4C>(0DEFDGH)I J

*I
J-
.

K

L

I
J

MN
OIL

Q
R

.J
S

T

MN
OILO

J

UVWT

XO

.P

O

J
*O
NJ-

K

.

I
J

!
"#$%&'()*+,-O

Y0ZZ[Y0ZZ
\0123'5;<3%$8#576$;3%76$<373%?3=>3%
2$5%]>3%=4:
A==%3773=B%&63%&4C>(0DEFDGH)

.^WW

VWW_V ``

"#$%&'()*+,-

Y0ZZ[Y0ZZ
a0123>%$>$73=>%$=5#6@&'3]&'#@5=&'(<%4'= '4;37]6$<37$@=46623<57&'3774'= 376&;463623>3%#3'64(3$874@37$88@$93% 4'=;4'584#65%3=>%$=5#67
A==%3773=B%&63%&4C>(0bZFbDH)

K

UWW

cP
d
X

I
J
J

eO

f

Wg

`Wg

O

T
e

Y0ZZ[Y0ZZ
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 61, Packet Page 153

!"
#

%

#
& %
'()*+,-.*/01/21-3114

/15411-/2
62-1--72-
8//1--1/9+1*,0
(:;<:=.

$ %

%

>?$%$

@
&$

##A %
%
&

>B

%

#
C $

$

C $

@
&>
D
#$
#

$

$

$

$

#

>B
%

C $

#
> AE

C
E

%
## C $

#
%>B
FGH

# #

%

!
#

$

$
C $

I(JJKI(JJ
L(L3*005*651M/1-61/1541N-141 01/21-M2O61341751-M*/ 0/2+-12+N/2 +*-0+*+ 8//1--1/9+1*,0
(:=<:P.
$
%

#
$

#

##A

?$
#
%$
%

# %

%$$Q?
%

H
>
%

@
#

%>

I(JJKI(JJ
S('T+719**6-U2-1--T553O+5*5
*/-+*+15*T-(11VV997*0+1PM8+51P*-+71N
01+*+1+*51-+*65-7O1+-+719+N3
V+11N
8//1--1/9+1*,0
(:P<=I.
W

$

ERX"YFR

$

Z

>$#

C $
%
#

>
#

$
#

$
#

#

C

&

%
#

C

$EE"[\@\ ]>W

%
^
#
$
&

%## C ##
%

$#

A

#
$

$

#

$

$
FGH

%

$

!
#

I(JJKI(JJ
_('T**6-*/**6-0/2+-T5561 +*`1/*/O+1/+0141+/41- 8//1--1/9+1*,0 (=I<=:.
FGH

#

%

& $R
%
I(JJKI(JJ
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 62, Packet Page 154

!

!

"
!

#
#$

%

""

%"%

%

!

!

&
$
!

%

!

'
"
&

'
!

"

&
%

!

"

!

!"

("
"%"
%%

&
"""

)#
"

%"%

"

!
%"

$

%"%*+,-./0123456%"

"
"

789:;<.-<-=;>?@=A;B@0@1;B;0A<C@0D/0,CE>/01
?@=A;>/=<-=@CC-,@A/-0=D=;,E./AFB;@=E.;=D
B;A:->=-G.;0>;./01@CC?@=A;E0E=@HC;@0> E0.;,-10/I@HC;D@0>A:;J;0>-./0,:@.1;-G>/=<-=@C K>>.;==;>L./A;./@M<18NOPNQR2""

&S"

&
%!
$

#$
&
"

""

"
#
"!

"

%!

%"

!

&

U
(

'

!S

"

$

&

# "
!
%"

!

!

"
$!

U

!%

%"

!

&

%

V5WXW%"

Y#$

$&

!

'
" !
!

"!%
*
+,-./01234Z6
!

"
"

%"

!

N8[[\N8[[
]89:;<.-<-=;>->-.,-0A.-C<C@0A-<.;J;0A@0F
->-.1;0;.@A;>/0=/>;A:;C-,@A/-0G.-BH;/01
>;A;,A;>-0@>^@,;0A<.-<;.A/;=-.<EHC/,./1:A=P-GP
?@FD-.?/A:/0@0F-A:;.E0/AC-,@A;>?/A:/0A:; =@B;HE/C>/01@=A:;,@00@H/=HE=/0;==/GA:; ,@00@H/=HE=/0;==-,,E</;=-0CF@<-.A/-0-G@ HE/C>/01
K>>.;==;>L./A;./@M<18NQPN_R2

!

!
"%

%

!
!

!

!
%$

!

!
&

%

!&

%

&!
%
&

"
"

`
a

!

!&

"&

b

'

c

%
&

$&
!
"

&

"

!

%"

c(

d*5
ce

%

!
" ""

$

!&

!

# "
!

%

%"

!

%
$!
%%

(

!)f
N8[[\N8[[
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 63, Packet Page 155

!"#$%&'()*

+,-#$.$ /0&
1,2"!3#4/.564%/78!" !$07"6 7#!$9
!:/".7#!$09;.#$7/$.$ /9 !;:/$0.7#!$!8
/;:<!=//09/>6#:;/$79:"!:/"7=</.0/9
0/ 6"#7=/>6#:;/$7.$407.889?#7=8//09

07.7/8//0967#<#7= !0709:"!46 7:6" @.0/0
.$4!7@/".$7# #:.7/4 !$7#$%/$ = !070,
A@/564%/7;6074/;!$07".7/0688# #/$7
.:#7.<#$:<. /7!:.=07."76: !070.$4.7
</.077@"//;!$7@0!8!:/".7#$% !0709.0
B/<<.0.4/0 "#:7#!$!87@/0!6" /0.$4 60/0!886$40 144"/00/4?"#7/"#.C:%,DEFGHI&J

K

L

MN
O

!"#$%&'(P*

G,HHQG,HH
R,2"!3#4/:"!!8!8 .:#7.<#S.7#!$9#$7@/8!"; !84! 6;/$7.7#!$!8 .0@!"!7@/"<#>6#4 .00/70!$@.$49T/77/"0!8?"/4#7!"!7@/" />6#3.</$7.00/70B@# @ .$5/3/"#8#/45=
7@/?#7=
144"/00/4?"#7/"#.C:%,GUV2W--#</XDI&

MNNYZPOO
[

N\]

^

_

`

a

b
[

ca
d

MNOOY\Y
PZK

e
L

!"#$%&'(P*

e

G,HHQG,HH
?,2"!3#4/.:"!8!";.8!".7</.077@"//=/."0
!8!:/".7#!$0
144"/00/4?"#7/"#.C:%,GUFGDI&
!"#$%&'(P*

PJ

G,HHQG,HH
W,2"!3#4/.0 @/46</8!"5/%#$$#$%!:/".7#!$9
#$ <64#$%.$."".7#3/!67<#$#$%.$=
:"!:!0/4 !$07"6 7#!$.$4#;:"!3/;/$70
.$4.7#;/<#$/8!" !;:</7#!$,
144"/00/4?"#7/"#.C:%,GDFGfI&

g

N\N)

[

h ^

g

e

g

h
a

b

K

ijha

k_

l

m

K

g

N\NP
a

!"#$%&'(P*[

Y

G,HHQG,HH
A!7.<&DH,HHQDH,HH

ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 64, Packet Page 156

!"# $%&'(# %!')
"
(
!'* #+
"%
*

"*
),+"-'" .
)
*$.
(( $%"/

(
!'* #+
"%!"%,

*

"*
)0 # %1$'(
(#"..
$*"# *)1
"*#+(
!'* #+!$%('#"%#,'#&'(#!
"*+
)
&$%(#*"#
#"# #&

#(#
-'" .
)
*$.
(( $%"
(#"%)"*)#$*
!
2 #
"

*$
* "#

$ %#(.$*
"! !* #
* $% %# ((
!# $%/

!"%#&'(#"($ (',& ##
-'" . !"# $%($.#

*($%3(4
*

"* %5
#
(
!'* #+#$2
* .+#"##
+&

##
-'" .
)
*$.
(( $%"(#"%)"*)(/
677
7

89:;<:=
!$%#*"!#
)0 #>")$*
?%#
*
* (
(@A

*&$*#
!B
!'* #+3ABCBDDEFFGGGH
ABCBDCIFJ4 ("K" .$*% ","(
)L
!
%(
)L,$%)
)"%) %('*
)* (M& # 5"# $%. *& (
*2 %52"* $'(!$&&'% #
(#*$'5$'#K" .$*% "/

9
3NF4(
!'* #+
"%)
2 $

),+-'" .
) # *)1
"*#+
*$.
(( $%"

O
PQ8

)
(!*
# $%$.$

*"# $%"
(
!'* #+L %!') %5,'#%$# & #
)#$R

66

S 7T

8
U

V
W7
677
7

89XP<X

,'
#1*
( (#"%#
D
Y 5"((

"*"#
(#
$,,+.*$& & #
)"!!
((
"*
"(3Z

(4L"%)."! "*
!$5% # $%!"&
*"(&$% #$*
%) 2 )'"(HK'(#$&
*("!!
((#
*
#" .$$*$%+".#
*
C@2
* . !"# $%L0 #(
!'* #+5'"*)(
*
(
%##$&"%"5
( #'"# $%(H@"#""%"+( (

($
# & [
!'(#$&
*.$0L

%('* %5
.. !
%##*"%("!# $%("%)& % & [ %5#
.#
* (M(HK"%%", (5$$)("*
) (
"+
)(
!'*
+L0 # ("&

(
*$2 )
)'%)
*('

*2 ( $%HB#$*"5
*$$&(
'(
, $&
#* !#
!%$$5+.$*"!!
((L"%)
&
$+

C@ ,")5
(0 #\]C@!"
", #
(#*"!M&$2
&
%#0 # % #
."! #+H^ ( #$*
*$#$!$(&"%)"#
C@2
* . !"# $%L
( 5%1 %L,")5
(L"%)('

*2 (
)"!!
((.$*%$%1
&
$+

(HZ$5("*
&" %#" %
).$*"%$%1
&
$+

%#*
( %#$Z

(L
%('* %5"!!$'%#", #+"%) !$&
"%!
0 #*
5'"# $%(/

9
3N_/`4)
(!* ,
("!!
((!$%#*$(+(#
&(L3N_/`4
!$2
*("
%#*+
$ %#(L3N_/`4 & #
)"!!
(("*
"(L
3N_/`4
*$!
)'*
(.$*&"%"5 %5"%)!$%#*$ %5
2 ( #$*(L3NF4'(
$.M
+!"*)"!!
((!$%#*$(+(#
&L
3N_/`42 ( #$*
*$!
)'*
("%)$5)
(!* ,
)L3N_/`4
2 ( #$*,")5
"%)
(!$*#
$ !
(
O
ab U

7
9 677
7

89X<X:
Z & #
)
!!
((
*
"(
3Z

(4"*
)
( 5%"#
).$*(#$* %5 %2
%#$*+L"!!
(( ,
$%+#$"'#$* [
)

*($%%
HA $&
#* ! %
'#)
2 !
(
!$%#*$"!!
((#$#
(
"*
"(L0 #

!#*$% !*
!$*)(
$."!!
((&" %#" %
).$*(
2 %+
"*(Hc
")$0D$ %#$.
B"
3DEB4($.#0"*
%#
5*"#
(0 #c
#*!.$*
%2
%#$*+&"%"5
&
%#L
%('* %5"!!'*"#
#*"!M %5$.

*$)'!#(#*$'5$'##
('

+!" %HB
!'*
(#$*"5
*$$&(&

#(#* %5
%#.
)
*"(

! . !"# $%(L
-'

) 0 #""*&(+(#
&("%)('*2
"%!
#
!%$$5+H
B

"*"#
(#$*"5
"*
"("*
)
( 5%"#
).$*!"("%)
*$)'!#(L
"!&

# %5.
)
*"(#"%)"*)("%)(',d
!#
#$(#* !#"!!
((!$%#*$(HC%!$& %5)
2 *
("*
!"*
.'+!$$*) %"#
)"%)2
* .
)#$& % & [

Y
$('*
$.
*$)'!#(H
)) # $%"&
"('*
( %!')

e:O
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 65, Packet Page 157

!"#$%&'()
*+

'()
*+

'()
*+

'()
*+

'()
*+

'()
*+

'()
*+

,

-./01"234562 /77"64467-"#56"#189%.:;<::=&

>
,
?

'>,?+

@

AB

>,?

B

F
>
F

D

!"#$%&'()
*+

@

'()
*+

'()
*+
'(G+

'()
*+

,

H.IIJK.II
L.M"N6#001$ 66OM#926$5 /77"64467-"#56"#189%.:P<:Q=&

B

GR)

?

S

T

F

D

'TFD+

E
UVW

K.IIJK.II
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 66, Packet Page 158

!"#$%&
'()*+

%&
'(,

%&
'(

%

-(.%&
'(/
0

%&
'( 1

0

%&
'(

%&
'(
+ %&
'(

2345
678 9#59"6 585"8!" :66 57756; !85 !9<=#3>?@ABC$

0

/
/

/

.D

0
/

E
FGE

/

+/

.H

/

.I
1

/

/
JJ

1

K

E
FG
E

L

L
.M

1

/

.
J

0

,MII

.N

/+
+/

/.M

L

0

1

OL

/

/

!"#$%&(

P

%&(

%&(

/ %&(/

%
)-(
Q3RRSQ3RR
T3U5 !V585
5 W !8X$I

/ Y

:3U 85
8!"#7W W"6!"#= =5 8!57 :66 57756; !85 !9<=#3AB@ATC$

0

.

/

/

/

[

.

L

Z

.G

Q3RRSQ3RR
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 67, Packet Page 159

!"#$

"#$

"
%$"#$

"
&%$"#$

'()*+,
-./-

0 , 122
0,,023

40 -56 (7897:;!

A

>B

!"#CD$

"#CD$

"#$

"#$

"#CD$

"#CD$
E

:(FFG:(FF
3(HI40

.
*4
122
0,,023

40 -56 (7:97J;!

K

L
B
"KLB$

<
M

ELO

PLQK?P

M

M

S

M
M

>T

=

>
N

A
ELO

R

>
U

!"#CD$

R

"#CD$

"#$

"#$

"#$

:(FFG:(FF
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 68, Packet Page 160

!"#$%&'$'()*%&+,)-*.$
/*!0%.'.1+2-.!*3"&'*/*%$'$45677*8!*9'(: ;'()*%&+<=->%('"$'.?->%@!*"%-#1-$'.@%*8A9:'")81'* !@,)-*.$%"(>).'$1!&:/-*&#&%8'-".@)>>#&%8'-*8'. !@@%('*$='"$)*%",-&>'-$&!"',)-*.%$/*'$'"&-&->> &%8'$=B%&:$:%@&$.%0%.'.%"&!7=6=-".?$:%@&$AC)-*.$ -*'$&*-&',%(->>+$&-&%!"'.&:*!),:!)&&:'@-(%>%&+=
%"(>).%",&:'8-%"'"&*-"('=*'&-%>@>!!*=0'".!*
%"&-D'=>!11+=-".*!0%",/-&*!>$!@->>.'/-*&8'"&$
-".'E&'*%!*-*'-$A9:'+-*'*'$/!"$%1>'@!*/*!&'(&%", /*!/'*&+='"@!*(%",-(('$$(!"&*!>$=(!".)(&%",
/-&*!>$=-".*'$/!".%",&!->-*8$-".$'()*%&+
.'@%(%'"(%'$AC)-*.$@!>>!B$/'(%@%(/!$&!*.'*$-". 8-")->$/*!0%.'.1+7*8!*9'(:=B%&:.-%>+-(&%0%&%'$ *-",%",@*!8$-@',)-*.%",/*!/'*&+&!'"@!*(%",
/!>%(%'$=8!"%&!*%",??9F(-8'*-$=-".(!".)(&%",
%"$/'(&%!"$A'"$)*%",(!8/>%-"('B%&:*',)>-&%!"$-". *'$/!".%",'@@'(&%0'>+&!'8'*,'"(%'$-".$'()*%&+ &:*'-&$G
H

4IJGK<,)-*.$=4IJGK<>%('"$'.1+6;L;=4I<
(>'-*>+.'@%"'.*'$/!"$%1%>%&%'$G4I<M#:!)*$'()*%&+= 4I<(!"$%.'*'.@-(&!*$$)(:-$/'-D1)$%"'$$&%8'$G
NOOPNOO
NQR

S

T

7.'$(*%/&%!"!@
'8/>!+''&*-%"%",-".,'"'*->$'()*%&+/!>%(%'$&! /*!&'(&&:'/:+$%(->$-@'&+!@'8/>!+''$

U 9*-%"%",(!0'*$/*!.)(&
:-".>%",=1)*,>-*+V*!11'*+/*!&!(!>=$'()*%&+
8'-$)*'$=-".!&:'*:-W-*.$$/'(%@%(&!&:'%".)$&*+A
38/>!+''$)".'*,!'E&'"$%0'@%0'#.-+&*-%"%",=B:%(: %"(>).'$(>-$$*!!8%"$&*)(&%!"-"./*-(&%(-> .'8!"$&*-&%!"$A&!/%($=%"(>).%",/*'0'"&%",.%0'*$%!" -".&:'@&=8-%"&-%"%",$'()*%&+/*!&!(!>$=:-".>%", '8'*,'"(%'$=-".'"$)*%",(!8/>%-"('B%&:>-B$
,!0'*"%",/'*$!"->)$'A38/>!+''$8)$&/-$$-
B*%&&'"'E-8%"-&%!"1'@!*'/*!,*'$$%",&!/*-(&%(->
&*-%"%",-&&:'@-(%>%&+=B:'*'&:'+.'8!"$&*-&'&:'%* -1%>%&+&!-//>+&:'>'-*"'./*!('.)*'$A/*!0%.'$
!",!%",&*-%"%",!"(-$::-".>%",=*!11'*+-". 1)*,>-*+/*!&!(!>$='8'*,'"(+*'$/!"$'=B!*D/>-(' $-@'&+=-".:'->&:$&-".-*.$A->$!&*-%"'.!"()$&!8'* $'*0%('=/*!.)(&D"!B>'.,'=-".!/'*-&%!"->
/*!('.)*'$$)(:-$%"0'"&!*+8-"-,'8'"&-"./!%"&#
!@#$->'$+$&'8$G
H

4I<(!8/*':'"$%0'&*-%"%",=4I<
.'8!"$&*-&%!"!@*%$D$B%&:8'-$)*'$&!8%&%,-&'=4I<
@!*8->&*-%"%",X-"")->*'@*'$:'*$-".$(:'.)>'. .*%>>$ YOOPYOO
S
YZ
OPNOOO

H

H

S

T[OT

S

[H

S

T 7/>-".'&-%>%",
&:'/*!('.)*'$@!*\;-@'>+$'()*%",=$&!*%",=-". &*-"$/!*&%",->>(-""-1%$=(-""-1%$/*!.)(&$=-"+ :-W-*.!)$8-&'*%->$&:-&8-+1')$'.1+&:' 1)$%"'$$=-".-"+()**'"(+

ZOZ
!)&>%"'$
(!8/*':'"$%0'8'-$)*'$@!*$'()*'$&!*-,'!@
(-""-1%$/*!.)(&$A!)&>%"'$/*!&!(!>$@!*&*-"$@'**%", (-""-1%$/*!.)(&$B%&:%"&:'/*'8%$'$=*'('%0%",
$:%/8'"&$@*!8>%('"$'..%$&*%1)&!*$=-"..'>%0'*%",
[OOOP[OOO
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 69, Packet Page 161

!"#$%&'()

*+,-$./0//1./0//

2 +!"3$4,5 ,"6378-972"+:-,";</:!"+=*+,->
.04
,-?! 2$@ABCDEFAGHAIJJKECLMGNBJKLMBOPDKPCLK

R

S

R

TUDCALMVWPDIJJKECLMGNBKPCLK

X66 2==26Y !+2 !,;8#0Z[\ZZ>$
]

)
R

^

_'`

Tb

TU

cR

T

]

)

T

R

T
R

R

dR

S

T
efghi

TU

!"#$%&k(

%&jh(h`
lh`

%&(

]

U

jS

''`

m0n/1n0//
<0op752 q378-922=$r

R

T

R

X66 2==26Y !+2 !,;8#0ZZ>$r

!"#$%&'jh(s

%&'jh(
s

%&(

<0//1<0//
t0378-922u2=8"=!5!-!+!2=$r

R

X66 2==26Y !+2 !,;8#0ZZ\v.>$

!"#$%&(

.0//1.0//
m0378-922w,#2=$r

T

X66 2==26Y !+2 !,;8#0v.\v<>$

T

xkjh'

T

b

T

jh'

!"#$%&k(

T

%&(T

y
i

T

xkjzk%k'k(
t0//1n0//
n0378-922{2"2q!+=$r

R

X66 2==26Y !+2 !,;8#0v<\vZ>$

T

R

U
T

TU'

UT

m0//1n0//
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 70, Packet Page 162

!

"
#
$

%
!

&'
(

"
"

)

"'#

+
%

)
,-

.

/

#
./#

1
2
3

1

.

4

-50/

-50/
4

.

-,
6

&

0

$

"'5
'0
789:;<=>?
3
3

?
3
3

@?
A
@
?

B/

3

B
CDEFGH9IJJK9<LM;N8:;F;<OP;9<Q9H;8;JN>
3R

R3

SMM:JNNJMT:;PJ:;OUG=DVWLVVX> Y

4

33

@

R

'

,3

4

@

@
Z[

! 3

@
3

@

@R3

@R3

3
3

R3

3

$
.

\*
3]B"B.4
.

-

B
789:;<=>?^

3

_D``a_D``
b9POH>cCDd`a_`D``

7J8P;9<e>f98OHE<PJ:G:;NJO<ME<=O=JFJ<PQHO<Ug`Q9;<PNb9POHX cDT9FFh<;PIE<=O=JFJ<P>/

@
@

3

3R3

3
@

Z3

Z

Y

SMM:JNNJMT:;PJ:;OUG=Dc``Lc`CX>

@

@

6

@ ij@

Y

R33

@
3

+
#

#@k

5
!
k
5!
+

@

"

@

"

3 +
5

/4
@

-@/3

c`D``ac`D``
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 71, Packet Page 163

!

"

#
$ %
&

#
&

'

#

!

( "
!

&
"

)!!*

+
,-.

#

"

/
"

!

"0!
1

&
"

"0!

&

2

3&

,"

"

1

)!
&

4
2
56789:;<=>?

=>?
!

=>?@

=>?
!

=>?

,

=>?

=>?

,

=>?

=>?

A BC
...

DEF7GGH:9IJKL9;:GM:I<$

(
KEF7::M6I97:I7INMF9IJOPQ9L9IJI7RM8SMINM F9IJOTPG9L9P89IJU9ININMF9IJOP:V 9::7SPI9SMQHR9:MRRG7VMLR67:R9RIM:IU9IN WXYZ[W\]^_`aabc[W\KVV8MRRMVF89IM89Pde;Efghifgjk<! !&

"

"

"
"

!
0 4
1

"

!

/,/

!!"

4

"
" !!

!
3"

, #

/

"

!
$

!

&
"

$

%
l"

%

"

"
#

mEggnmEgg
ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 72, Packet Page 164

!"#$%&

'
$%&

(

$%&
)

(

'$%&

*

'$%&

+

*
'

'

*

,-./01023245467489:02;2;<=023>?@<6<8A1
BCD!ED!FDGGC
DHCIJGI
K
GCD!JED!L LIJ "!JMD!LDLJ
NLLIJJILO MI DPG"-QRSTQQUV#W
X

X

Y

'

Z

Y[

'

'

'

'
(

'

'

\
'

'*(

[]

(
(

*

'^
*

'
_(

'

'

[

*

'

*

\
'

'

*

!"#$%`&
'

a-RRba-RR
U-c

DC,dJ !IJJBDM!IJe GJ#f

(

*

*

*
*

*

NLLIJJILO MI DPG"-QQUTQQaV#

+

(

[

*

*

_
g

_'fi
g'
h
Y
^

' j
h

(
g

[fi
g
h
Y
^

'

'
k

'

(

h
Y
^

[j
h

(

'

*

[
*

(

*

(

!"#$%l&
'

QR-RRbQR-RR
m
MDC#UR-RRbUR-RR

ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 73, Packet Page 165

!"#$%&'(&)*)+#,#(-&*-./"-*!"0,&(-./".,#&*"##"# '%-$(&$"#1&*$/,!&*2.,(*)(/&3&("!()4

567

89
7
: 6
:

;;
7 ;<

5=6;>?@
),(/&*"##(%-("2&$
#("'#()%"!,$"&(#"*A&%)*3"*(-/&3'-$(-*!$-%.)* +))('%&*(BCD"#"#("'#&*$/,!"'%)3)(&*2-/("%*-(&A" (%-*#')%(-(&)*3"(D)!#+)%"3'/)E""#-*!$,#()3"%#1 &3'/"3"*(&*2F-#("%"!,$(&)*-*!%"$E$/&*2'%-$(&$"#1
"*#,%&*2$)3'/&-*$"F&(DF-#("3-*-2"3"*(
%"2,/-(&)*#1,(&/&G&*2"*"%2EH"++&$&"*(A"D&$/"#1
$)*!,$(&*2"*"%2E,#"-,!&(#1',%$D-#&*2$-%.)* )++#"(#1-*!$)33&((&*2()!)*-(&*2I)+-**,-/ &*$)3"()"*A&%)*3"*(-/$-,#"#(D%),2D(D"I+)%
(D"J/-*"(3"3."%#D&'B&!"*(&+&"#/)$-/"*A&%)*3"*(-/
)%2-*&G-(&)*#&*K)*("%"E()#,'')%(F&(D&(#-**,-/
!)*-(&)*#1"3'D-#&G&*2-$)33&(3"*(() #,#(-&*-.&/&(E-*!$)33,*&(E&*A)/A"3"*(L
;
MNOP(D)%),2D1!"(-&/"!1-*!#(%-("2&$3"*(&)* )+#("'#()%"!,$"$-%.)*+))('%&*( QRQ

S
;
T
R

:

76 U
V<6W <<<
X

S:W
<
<
<6
; :
?
;

W

:
Y7;W

5=6;@?Z
&3'/"3"*(&*2
A-%&),#"*"%2E$)*#"%A-(&)*+"-(,%"#B["E+"-(,%"#
&*("2%-("!&*())'"%-(&)*#&*$/,!"2%""*.,&/!&*2
!"#&2*-*!"\"$,(&)*1"*"%2EH"++&$&"*(/&2D(&*21F-("% $)*#"%A-(&)*3"-#,%"#1-$-**-.&#'-$]-2&*2%"$E$/&*2
'%)2%-31-*!"/"$(%&$A"D&$/"$D-%2&*2#(-(&)*#&*(D" '-%]&*2/)(B"++)%(#-&3()%"!,$""*"%2E$)*#,3'(&)*1 3&*&3&G"F-#("2"*"%-(&)*1-*!'%)3)(" "*A&%)*3"*(-/%"#')*#&.&/&(EB"3'/)E""(%-&*&*2 "*#,%"#$)3'/&-*$"F&(D#,#(-&*-.&/&(E#(-*!-%!#1
%"&*+)%$&*2(D"$)33&(3"*(()%"!,$&*2
"*A&%)*3"*(-/&3'-$(-$%)##-//)'"%-(&)*#L

;
MN^P(D)%),2D1!"(-&/"!1-*!#(%-("2&$
3"*(&)*)+"*"%2E$)*#"%A-(&)*)%#,#(-&*-.&/&(E
+"-(,%"#
R
=67

89

7

T
: <
T R<

:
7
6 T:8 9
;

6
8; : 8 96: < 5=6; 3-&*(-&*##(%)*2/-.)%
#(-*!-%!#&*-#,'')%(&A"F)%]'/-$"-*!"\("*!#(D"#" #(-*!-%!#()A"*!)%'-%(*"%#.E'%&)%&(&G&*2 '-%(*"%#D&'#F&(D(D)#"FD)A-/,"#)$&-/"0,&(E1
!&A"%#&(E1&*$/,#&)*1-*!+-&%/-.)%'%-$(&$"#B_(%-("2&"# ()"*#,%"%"#')*#&./"#),%$&*2&*$/,!"$)//-.)%-(&)* F&(D(D"`*&("!a))!-*!b)33"%$&-/c)%]"%#`*&)* M`abcP1%"0,&%&*2b-/Hd_e $)3'/&-*$"+)%3-*-2"%&-/ #(-++1$)*!,$(&*2#&("A&#&(#()A-/&!-("#-+"(E'%-$(&$"#1 -*!'%"+"%%&*2A"*!)%#F&(D#,#(-&*-./"'%-$(&$"#-*! (D&%!H'-%(E$"%(&+&$-(&)*#B#""]#()F)%]F&(D*)*H A)/-(&/"3-*,+-$(,%"%#()3&*&3&G"F)%]"%"\')#,%"() D-G-%!#B
;
MNOP(D)%),2D1!"(-&/"!1-*!#(%-("2&$3"*(&)* )+#("'#)+D)F()#),%$"'%)!,$(#B$/"-% &3'/"3"*(-(&)*'/-*#-*!#,$$"##3"(%&$#
QRQ

R

ATTACHMENT 10
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 74, Packet Page 166

$%&'()*+,-./0%12334)'&*5,&.06782 99:;< =
>
> ?<<:<<

@A:?;B#

=
>
>C

D
#

EF
C

G

H
IJ

E70L'%)/05M0 NOPQRSPPTURSVWPXVQTVSYXSVQSRZSQRTURQR[\]^R^[QR[\ &*_`30%&5)*+&40+&44a30%.)550_`%4)'0*L0_%05&)4
'&**&/)L/-L)*0LL)*5M0b*)50_c5&50Ld`%`5M0%/-L)*0LL )*&L).)4&%4ac5&50%0+-4&50_&'5)e)5a
>>

GfJI
ghijklHE`m*0%Lm)5M;<n a0&%L`o'&**&/)L)*_-L5%a0p30%)0*'0qA`o;`m*0%L m)5M3%)`%%05&)4'&**&/)L0p30%)0*'0qr*o)*)5a2LL05L s`*50%0attu_`0L*`5`30%&50`%M`4_&*a4)'0*L0L
&LL`')&50_5`&*`5M0%'&**&/)L%05&)4/-L)*0LLq
M`m0e0%`m*0%LM)350&.M&L`m*0_vn%05&)4
4`'&5)`*L)*u&4)o`%*)&/&L0_`*7uu4)'0*L0L0&%'M:
#

fEwnAx.`%05M&*y;B`m*0%LM)350&.m)5M 0p30%)0*'0)*u&**&/)L`%c5&50%0+-4&50_&'5)e)5adwnzx ;na0&%L`o'&**&/)L0p30%)0*'0dwnzx.&*&+0_&*_ `30%&50_*`*{L5`%0o%`*5%05&)4/-L)*0LLd*`4)'0*L0_ %05&)4/-L)*0LL0L IJCIJ
J

"
>
|
=
>f
E70L'%)/0a`-%
`e0%&44(*`m40_+0`o5M0'&**&/)L)*_-L5%ad)*'4-_)*+
)_0*5)o)'&5)`*`oM`m)*_-L5%a/0L53%&'5)'0L&*_ c5&50%0+-4&5)`*LM&e0/00*)*'`%3`%&50_)* 0p)L5)*+63%)`%40+&4/-L)*0LL0L`-5L)_05M0u)5a`o s`*50%0a
>>

GfJl
}HE~p'035)`*&4
-*_0%L5&*_)*+`o5M0'&**&/)L)*_-L5%a:%`e)_0L&* 0pM&-L5)e0&*_'`.3%0M0*L)e0`e0%e)0m`o)*_-L5%a /0L53%&'5)'0L&*_L5&50%0+-4&5)`*Ld)*'4-_)*+*-&*'0_ )*L)+M5L&*_&_e&*'0_&*&4aL)L:70.`*L5%&50L& L`3M)L5)'&50_-*_0%L5&*_)*+`oM`m%0+-4&5)`*L&%0 )*'`%3`%&50_)*5`0p)L5)*+`%3%)`%40+&4/-L)*0LL0Ld m)5M0p0.34&%a0p&.340L&*_)*{_035M&*&4aL)L:
#

fE~p'035)`*&4wn<x{&334)'&*5_0.`*L5%&50L
0p'035)`*&4(*`m40_+0`o5M0'&**&/)L)*_-L5%a:80L5
3%&'5)'0Ldu)5a&*_c5&50%0+-4&5)`*L%0o0%0*'0_ 5M%`-+M`-55M00*5)%0&334)'&5)`* IJCIJ
gJ=

D
"

70L'%)/05M0 )*e`4e0.0*5`o5M0`m*0%LM)350&.)*5M0_&a{5`{_&a `30%&5)`*&*_.&*&+0.0*5`o5M03%`3`L0_/-L)*0LL
>>

GfJl
HEs)+-04`_%)+-0d&Lu~
d
)L%0L3`*L)/40o`%L5&oo)*+_0')L)`*Ld/-_+05`e0%L)+M5d o&')4)5a_0L)+*d3%`_-'5.0*-_0e04`3.0*5d&*_`e0%&44 L5%&50+)'_)%0'5)`*q7&e)_&*+dL0%e)*+&Lu
d
.&*&+0Lo)*&*')&4&L30'5Ld3&a%`44d/-_+05)*+d&*_ )*e0L5`%%04&5)`*LdmM)40&4L``e0%L00)*+'`.34)&*'0&L uu
q-L5)*&%)*d&Lu

d).340.0*5LL5%&50+)'L&40L
34&*Ld0*o`%'0L3`4)')0Ld&*_.&*&+0L`30%&5)`*Ld
)*'4-_)*+o&')4)5a'`*L5%-'5)`*quM%)L0L50%d&Lc0'-%)5a &')4)5)0L7)%0'5`%d0*L-%0LL)50L0'-%)5ad`e0%L00L o&')4)5a.&*&+0.0*5d&*_.&*&+0L5M0/-_+05q&.0L
04&%_0d&Lu`..-*)5a04&5)`*L7)%0'5`%t)&)L`*d
0*+&+0Lm)5M5M04`'&4'`..-*)5adM&*_40L
'`.34&)*5Ld&*_40&_L'`..-*)5a0*+&+0.0*50oo`%5Ld
IJCIJ
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 75, Packet Page 167

!"#$#%

#
#
&
'#(% #

)*+,-../01-2,/2.34/

5#6#

%
&#

#&

7
&

&
(#
'#8

#

&&
#(#
9
9

%#

7

# (
&(#%
%
#

66#
:;;-..-;12-/<=
*>?@AB
5
C
D
6#

E
F

G

H##%
#(
'(##
I&

6#
&

%#8#
%
#J
(K##D
# ##L6
G
#M%(

#&

&#

%
JN #O
#P8QQ

Q

#R#
#
I##
#&

J

%

#
#
&&

&#

6#8

%
#8#
#
#8

#JF
%
##

#
#&

(

SHK8H#H
&#8
NFTO
U

#&

##$##

#
#8'(#

###
&

%%
#8#
%
#
I

V"H &
#&

&

#
#&

'#8

#8

&&
W*XX3@X*XX
42/0
YW*XX3)X*XX

-2Z
Z[.-..+0/<)X+2.42/0B
@*Z[.-..\=-/2.
5#6#(#
9
9

%#

'((
##6#%
#&
(# %#
&#

66#

#
%% (
(
#8

8
#%

&(# &

' ]

:*^[.,\=-/2 :;;-..-;12-/<=
*@)B

%#

(
&
_

9_%

J

"%
%
#(

'(

#

@*XX3@*XX
Z*`,/==0/a0-b2c-1[.2d-c-e?=-.. :;;-..-;12-/<= *@W?@>B
L%

8

#
# ###6
##
%
##'(
#(#

(##
#Jf

6%

#6#&
(##$#
Jg(#
668
#

(#I98%

%%
%
##&

%#5#%

#
&

5 "#

J
H
&&#&(#
#

#

&#
(
#8#
%
#'(
##

&

6%(
#J

#
# h
!

%
#

%(
D#

#

N#
N
E

J
(#I9
&&
#
#
#
P#&
##&

#%
#$%#
%(

#
#g5JS#(#I#98
#
#
##(#g5
#&

#&

8#$%# (#%
#J

#%
&#

##
#(#%
9
&9
##
8

' &

#&

&
#
#

#

8%(
#
8

&#
#
9I##% &
%
#

%
#
J&#(#I98
###(# '

#
(#
#6PP#

#(# #

#

X*iX3@*XX
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 76, Packet Page 168

!
"
#!

$

%

!"&'(
%!#%%!

!##
!#
%
#)*#*
+,-./0123245/6761/895:; 48/<
1=/:6/;4;.>1>551/41>1.1./ ?@A@BC?DAEFA@BF@GAHIAEF@GAHB?J?@BDK L;/1371./:8=/30123245/6
1/84561=/:6/;>./1./=:6/666
413:554M417
N;;/66/;+1/49M ,OP<
Q!R
ST
&
!

!)!
#"*U
"!

!

!!
!
*

%
U!

&#*
&!$
Q!&&
%
)%#!&!

U
#
"
!V!#
#!

!
!#

"$WST

%&&
!#
%)
*
"UX

%!!"%
U!&&#%!!Y#

&

)$Z
!#
&!

!")&!
U

!
#%
!#

U![\Z]^Y!
#"*&
!
!
)
*
!"$Q!
!%#

#*

"!

#)*%#!)
!
%!!"%

#
!_ZS``
& "$ VST
%!#
##Y

!##!

!
!*"

U%#*
##!

%
V#"

! %#
"
!
!

"S!Y!
!#!

ST !%U

(

&

!

QaW[bU

c&ST

!

d,eefd,ee
g,hijHiDklmAEHBjm@n@nB?@A@BC?@GAHIAEF 14/6761/8344=64;44=6 M;:16>55=/4./o/; N;;/66/;+1/49M ,Op2dq<
"!

QaW[br#!
&%U%!!
Y*

!
#!U

!)
*%)%

U
!
!

U!%#!
!#
!
!
#*QaW[br##Y

s

Q!R
ST
&
!
)!#
%
)
*
"U
!#

!!#*

U!
!%#

!
"
#!

$!#
%)
*

"UX

%!!"%
U&&#% !!Y#
*U!")&!
U![\Z]^Y!
#"*&)
*
!"$
!)
*
)

U

!X

U!

!#U!!##

$a%#*
##Y
!

QaW[bU

X
#"
!#
!

"
)
!
!
%!
#!
$%"!!Y

!
&
##Y )&U!
U!

!"

"

#
U
!##
!
!

QaW[b$

""!!Y
#)
##!#
Y %

#

#*
!

"QaW[b

(
!#V#!!
)
O,eefO,ee
t,-./4:1 631>4/6761/81=/:6/; 1Mo;/M13645/;4144;4:;11456 3=1.M;:164;46. N;;/66/;+1/49M ,dq2du<

)
*
!

!
!*!!

!Y#
*&
!!Y

U"!X

U
!#
U
X
!!

U!

!#

)
)

&
$v"")

##Y
&! !#Y!

%#*

!
"
#!

$`

##
!#

X
!#
*
#U
!%!"
%%

%
X
!!
!

&U

!
QaW[br%%!
#*$[

##Y

#*U%
#*U! !%#*U

!
)

"!
%
#*
!

!

!*$\!!#

!
!

##!#
Y!

U

O,eefO,ee
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 77, Packet Page 169

!"#$%&'(

)*+,-!./0-
1
.23
/-23
0-2-4-56-
,
.76-589
:55-22-5; 3- 8<6"*=>?=@A#

BCDE

GHF

!"#$%&'

I

J*KKLJ*KK
M*+,-6
6 2-56

5. 3N !-7 !
N.5 !"08!5 !8/-273
0-2
N5833,-0.2 !-228!5 -23 /83-3,-6-
-!38"-
128N-2
11N
O-
8!5/8!.18

3.-56

5. 32
:55-22-5; 3- 8<6"*=@?PQA#

S

(TUE

V

(W

X

Y
B

RZ(

SE

SB

S

S

[
S

$&'\]^[
S
$F_'\&D^[
S
$]'\]^`
E

_EI$F_'\C^U

[
S
$]'\&F^
a

V
(

$_bb'\FD^cB

$&'\d^
c
HT

$&bb'\C^R

HR

$&bb'\D^e
E(
W

!"#$%&'(

I

J*KKLJ*KK
f*g

83 !<2A8!56

-5.-21
-
- 4 !"
5-N 4- -25. !"0.2 !-22,
.2
:55-22-5; 3- 8<6"*PQ?PhA#i

i
I

!"#$%&'

S

J*KKLJ*KK
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 78, Packet Page 170

!"#$%&'(%)(*+,-.(/01*+ 2.(&*++*34,5%146%(78%+,'(4+9,*2%/7*+5&.:-14*+&%; <%146%(75(46%(,*(%(49.(.',176%//%5*+5%='4--%5 >4/?+%&%,,*(75.&':%+/*/4.+;@'/9.4+9/(*+,2%(, *5?%(%/.,/(4&/-(.&%5'(%,84+&1'54+9-(.5'&/14:4/,
*+5/?.(.'9?6%?4&1%&?%&A,;$%&'(%-*&A*94+9*+5 ,*2%5(464+9-(*&/4&%,*(%-(4.(4/4B%5;C.:-(%?%+,46% /(*&A4+9*+5&.::'+4&*/4.+,7,/%:,*(%'/414B%58>4/? 5%/*41%55.&':%+/*/4.+:*4+/*4+%52.((%9'1*/.(7 &.:-14*+&%*+5/(*+,-*(%+//(*+,*&/4.+,DE5%146%(7
6%?4&1%
F
#GHEIJ--14&*+/-(.-.,%,/.-(.645%*5'1/K',% *+5:%54&4+*15%146%(7D-(.645%,&.:-(%?%+,46% 5%,&(4-/4.+.2-(.&%5'(%, L!!ML!!
NOP

Q
P

PF

R

! S"#@>+%(,*+5%T%&'/46% ,/*22-.,,%,,%T/%+,46%3',4+%,,*&':%+/.%+,'(% $@0,*(%(%9'1*/.(7&.:-14*+/*+5%+2.(&%*-.,4/46% &',/.:%(%T-%(4%+&%D)?%C?4%2@-%(*/4+9@224&%(8 U',/4+U*(4+8.6%(,%%,%:-1.7%%/(*4+4+9*+5%+,'(%,
$@0,*(%*5?%(%5/./?(.'9?*'54/,*+54+,-%&/4.+,D
,/(.+9&.:-14*+&%(%&.(58*5?%(4+9/.VJWCX$J8
:*4+/*4+4+9,%&'(4/7:%*,'(%,8.3/*4+4+9+%&%,,*(7
14&%+,%,8*+5'-?.154+9.-%(*/4.+*1-(.&%5'(%,D)?% 1%*5%(,?4-/%*:Y,5%54&*/4.+/.&.:-14*+&%-.,4/4.+, *,*(%,-.+,431%*+5,'&&%,,2'1-1*7%(4+/?%&*++*34, 4+5',/(78:%%/4+9/?%%T-%&/*/4.+,,%/37(%9'1*/.(7
*'/?.(4/4%,;
F
#GHEI&.:-(%?%+,46%5%,&(4-/4.+-(.645%5D
(%9'1*/4.+,(%2%(%+&%5/?(.'9?.'/*--14&*/4.+
L!!ML!!
ZOP

P

[

S
"#>411%,/*314,?*+5 :*+*9%*+*&/46%*&&.'+/>4/?4+C*142.(+4*Y,/(*&A*+5 /(*&%,7,/%:DJ+*--.4+/%5*&&.'+/:*+*9%(>411 .6%(,%%,7,/%:',*9%8%+,'(4+9*115%,49+*/%5',%(,
(%&%46%*--(.-(4*/%/(*4+4+9D>411-(.:-/17*55(%,,
&.:-14*+&%+./424&*/4.+,2(.:/?%/(*&A*+5/(*&% ,7,/%:*+5:*4+/*4+(%&.(5,.2(%,.1'/4.+DJ+7 546%(,4.+>4113%(%-.(/%5/.1.&*1*'/?.(4/4%,>4/?4+\] ?.'(,*+5(%,'1/4+4::%54*/%54,:4,,*1.(/%(:4+*/4.+ .2*&&%,,D%:-1.7,6*(4.',,*2%9'*(5,/.-(%6%+/ 546%(,4.+84+&1'54+9&.:-(%?%+,46%4+6%+/.(7&.+/(.18
,/(4&/+.+K546%(,4.+-.14&4%,8*+5-?7,4&*1,%&'(4/7
:%*,'(%,14A%645%.,'(6%411*+&%*+5*1*(:,7,/%:,D

0.14&4%,*(%4+-1*&%/.-(%6%+/*+545%+/4273./? &',/.:%(*+5,/*22546%(,4.+8>4/?*B%(.K/.1%(*+&% *--(.*&?*+54::%54*/%*&/4.+,2.(,',-%&/%5 4+&45%+/,84+&1'54+9(%-.(/4+9/.1*>%+2.(&%:%+/*+5 /%(:4+*/4.+42&.+24(:%5D$/*22/(*4+4+9%:-?*,4B%, *&&.'+/*3414/7*+5/?%.3149*/4.+/.(%-.(/*+7
,',-%&/%5546%(,4.+-(.:-/17;
F
#GHEI&.:-(%?%+,46%5%,&(4-/4.+-(.645%5
L!!ML!!
^_

P

P

"#-1*+&.6%(,
&.:-(.:4,%5&*++*34,8'+,*/4,2*&/.(7.('+,*1%*31% &*++*34,8+.+K&*++*34,>*,/%8&?%:4&*1>*,/%8*+5 &*++*34,-1*+/*+5-(.5'&/>*,/%D&.:-(.:4,%5 !!M !! ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 79, Packet Page 171

"#$
%

&

&
'

(

)

*
&+

,
-./01234 56!

&

789:;<0/</=;>/>/0./2?0/@<@A2?/<0;B;2?A2C
/>/03;2;0A?;>12=1>;?:;@/.A?1/2D0/EF;123
>;?;.?;>/2A>GA.;2?<0/<;0?1;=/0<HF@1.013:?=I/DI
JACK/0J1?:12A2C/?:;0H21?@/.A?;>J1?:12?:; =AE;FH1@>123A=?:;.A22AF1=FH=12;==1D?:; .A22AF1=FH=12;==/..H<1;=/2@CA</0?1/2/DA FH1@>123
L>>0;==;>M01?;01AN<38OPIQRS4

&

&

(T#U

&

&

, -./01234 56!

&

&

O8RRVO8RR
W8X12A2.;=4
L8Y0/B1>;AFH>3;?D/0./2=?0H.?1/2K
/<;0A?1/2=KEA12?;2A2.;K./E<;2=A?1/2/D
;E<@/C;;=K;ZH1<E;2?K<0/<;0?C@;A=;K
=;.H01?C;ZH1<E;2?A2>=?ADDKM1?CD;;=K
=?A?;D;;=KH?1@1?C./=?=K<0/>H.?<H0.:A=;=
A2>/?:;0A2?1.1<A?;>./2?123;2.C./=?=8
9:;FH>3;?EH=?>;E/2=?0A?;=HDD1.1;2?
.A<1?A@12<@A.;?/<AC=?A0?H<./=?=A2>A?
@;A=??:0;;E/2?:=/D/<;0A?123./=?=KA=
J;@@A=A>;=.01<?1/2/D?:;=/H0.;=A2> H=;=/DDH2>= L>>0;==;>M01?;01AN<38Q[IQWS4

\]]^6_
(

,
#

(

\]^666`
&

)

&

,a

b

\cd`66

-./01234 5`!
&

*

Q8RRVQ8RR
e8Y0/B1>;<0//D/D.A<1?A@1fA?1/2K12?:;D/0E /D>/.HE;2?A?1/2/D.A=:/0/?:;0@1ZH1> A==;?=/2:A2>Kg;??;0=/DM0;>1?/0/?:;0 ;ZH1BA@;2?A==;?=J:1.:.A2F;B;01D1;>FC
?:;M1?C
L>>0;==;>M01?;01AN<38QhiYjXX1@;kOS4

\_

&

+

"+
*

&
-./01234 5`!

Q8RRVQ8RR
M8Y0/B1>;A<0/D/0EAD/0A?@;A=??:0;;C;A0=
/D/<;0A?1/2=
L>>0;==;>M01?;01AN<38QOIQlS4
-./01234 5`!

`

* *

Q8RRVQ8RR
j8Y0/B1>;A=.:;>H@;D/0F;3122123/<;0A?1/2K

12.@H>123A2A00A?1B;/H?@12123A2C
L>>0;==;>M01?;01AN<38QlIQmS4

U
_n_6

o
_n_`,p

O8RRVQ8RR
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 80, Packet Page 172

!!"!

!

#$
!%&#
'(
!)*#

+')*,$!( -!.
#&
!(!&&#!
/0
#

!11/2

$!
-#!#!(
3!&!#45652/
7
89+:;,'

# (&
#((<
=

!

!
#(-&

>
?

@
9ABCDEFDDD

7

G97

HI
JFDI

@
K
L7

HI
90 =

!

&
&(!
&#
4
!
#
!#("4!%&!-(
#-!/
0 &#
4
!!"
#
!#(>
M &
!--
#!
#(M
!#
4&#
4&
!
"&

&
!#4
(

#!

!

%&!-(
#-!

!(!#(
#
!

#
#!

-#! #
#

/0 =

!

&
! &"

%&!-!
-

#+,
#
!#

&#
4
#-4
!

4

%&!-(
#-!
!(!#(/
NG

J8CBK9
#!
(>
'#

=#
O&#
4$P!Q#!RS*#(
T'UV$WX ='V;Y?
7
89+:1,&#
4
!(
("4%&!-(
#(M
!#
4
#-!
LDDELDD
Z[

H9=(#

-
#!
!
&#
4$&("&

(
\

NN G

7H

]

^
_
NG

J8`La`ZK9
!--!((#

#&
#R4!(!#(

#
b"#<=

-!
4

#($>
c
##(#!&

!
!4>

!&!4 (
<'&

#
&
#-4
#! !((

4>
&#
4"-#!
#
!
!#!<=
&#
#!#
#
(
!&
#.(
!!#$>
#
#%&#(-#
&!&
#.(((&!<O&#
4&!#(

#
(&
M
!(#
#
!4&!&
#.(
#<
=

4!(
#>!#(
-!
"!($
!(
#!
&#!#!&
#(<d!(

&
"#
&#(&

4
#
!
<0
!&#!>
e
!#

-'!!"'
#
#&!
/
7
89+:6/2,(#"!
#4

$+:6/2,
#!
#4

$+:6/2,

(!!#!$
+:6/2,
#(&#-#
!!!(
#

#$+:1,&-R4!#(!
#4

$
+:6/2,
#
#(&#!((#"(+
/f?,$
+:6/2,
#"!(!(#

FDDEFDD
gh

8 NG

J8`Ca``K9
!
!!&#(
#!!#!!"4
!&
#.(
!!#
&
#-">
#!(-#%&4
(
-!
<0 !#!(!
(-#
#! $
!!"
#(&
+c&(

#,$!(
#4#
<O&#
4
!&#&( FDDEFDD
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 81, Packet Page 173

"#$%&'()*+
,-.

*+
,-.

*+
,-.

*+
,-.

*+
,-.

/

*,01.*+
,-.

*,
.*+
,-.

,
23456%7"89:;7 4<<%;99;<2%&:;%&6=>(3?@AB

CD

E

C

F

G

E H

,
"#$%&'(B*+
,-.

*+
,-.
*,00.*+
,-.

*+K.

*,L-.*+K.

*,L
.*+
,-.

M3NNOM3NN
P3"Q%R;&556'#;;SQ&>7;': 4<<%;99;<2%&:;%&6=>(3?TAB

E

VF

F
*WEFF.!

CGU
*C
DHK-

K-

CD

X

1

WEFF

UYF

/

T3NNOM3NN
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 82, Packet Page 174

!"#$%&'()*+ ,-./

)*+ ,-0

)*+ ,-1
)*+ ,-

)*+ ,-

)*+ ,- 2

4567"#$89:#$;'7;&8$7:7&:%#& <88$79978=$%:7$%;>?'5@AB(C

D

1

0EC22

0
D

G
H

G

!"#$%&'I)*3-

J

)*3-

) G.-
)*3-

) G.-
K5LLMK5LL
N5O7$%P7:7$!7"Q$%:R(2

I

<5O$#:7":%&'9Q$$#Q&8%&'?$#?7$:%79 <88$79978=$%:7$%;>?'5SSTULKB(

V

!"#$%&'()*3-

)*3-

K5LLMK5LL
X5OYR9%";Z[;$$%7$9 <88$79978=$%:7$%;>?'5@LB(W

N5LLMK5LL
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 83, Packet Page 175

!

"
"

#
$%&'()*+,-#./

,-#./

,-/

,-#./

,-#./0

"
"

#
123456'(&'7(*85()* 9::'6;;6:1'(56'(<=>*2?@A+

"

"
"""

""

"

B

"

CDE

"#H.

"IJ"

! "

"
" KL

FG

"

#
$%&'()*+,-#./

"
,-#./

,-/

,-/
"

#
M2@@NO2@@
P2Q)R;(56;6%S'(5T*S<':;<):586('>'&>&;6: *S<':8&S';<):'6;>&);(U(7(5(6;9::'6;;6:1'(56'(<=>*2?@A+B"

"
C

V

!
"

"

W

"

#
X2@@NO2@@
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 84, Packet Page 176

$
%

$
&"

'
()*$

!
+,-./012234 456027
#

'
!

$$!

!'
!
855277259:24;/ ,<=>?@
A

"

!'

!
'
'%
BC

"

D
$ $E$
F

F

G

H
D$% $

%!'
BI'
!
& $$'

&
%
!BA$

&
!

!'
!

%

%

%
!
'
'
BJ

K"*

&$

LFM! '
&
D
B#

'
! !

"

N#H

&E

FMO#
M%M
$
'
!&

%
'

'$

%

'

&D
$' '

$
$

Q,RRSQ,RR
3:40
QT,RRS+R,RR

2:U
:4 245347/:4:604;>R6:73:40@
>,:4 245347/:4:604
#

$VM
!

"

!
$W'

$ '!""! $ "

!
!
855277259:24;/ ,XY=Z<@

'$

%'

"
B

"
D
$

$'

%

$
'
'

'B'$

%E
!
H
'
L

%
%

' $$
! [

A$$

%

>R,RRS>R,RR
3:40
>R,RRS>R,RR

2:-
\4]45-./01.2:604;?R6:73:40@
>,\40^2
_`abcde`fg`hiijdbklfmaijklanocjobkj
$
$

$E
!
H
!

! $

"! $#

855277259:24;/ ,ZY=<>@
''
$

q $
'H
!E
!D
$

q $
'

' $E
!H
!B'$
W

%
!

!

%

%

' "!

'

$ +,RRST,RR
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 85, Packet Page 177

!
"#!$%
& "'(") !)! *(
"+,

*
) !!- (!
"' )
.
! *
/(*,)
$"(*
!*"!
&
$),

0*! "
1
!0()

--()
"'
) )
%
+!
0('

!*$"(*(
-
!!
$!0(/
"'
--!
'$) *(
" !
"* *(
"
*
,) "'(' *
2
!

"*

!*$"(*(
+)
0!("%*,)

)( *'/(*,'$) *(
" "'*! ("("%+ !"*()
,( !
%! (
*
!
0('

!*$"(*(
-
!("'(0('$

/,

- ). !!(!
*
))

3456789:;<='* (' )*(
" "-
!
) ,(!("% "'
$*! ),+;<=>?@
) ,(!)
(*"*&;<=
-$"'("%-
!)!*(-() *(
"
&'%!
& "'
)( (A'
B(
*! ("("%CD() "*
*, *!)(0'-$
("*

)
(**'*

!*, "E>@
) ,(!-!
*,F(*

-G
"*!
C
HIJKLMN65OPLQR5SNNT:U'"*(-
*,"$.!
-

*("(*(
"("%& "'*, 2($ "$.!
-

/,"*,.$
("

(
*-$
) )(*

VWW6NTTNWX67YN67Z[Q9I\]^\_`:U"(*(
& "
*
, 0

* --
-?

+D*-$) )(*
&*,
* --(

2)*'*
(")!
*
*
*
-a$
b!

" " %"*
3456789:;<?C>=c
-

*("(*(
* !*$+;<?C>=
c
-

*-$
! *(
"&;<=)
(*"**
%! *!*, ">

HIddeHIdd
_IPLQR5SNNfNTQ58T7M7R7Y7NT:U'"*(-

(*(
"
*
.

' **,!

'.$
("

& "'*,(!
!

"
(.((*(

VWW6NTTNWX67YN67Z[Q9I\_^\g`:'* ('!

"
!
0(''-
!

(*(
"
('"*(-(' "'*,(!
!

"
(.((*(

3456789:;<=)
!,"
(0('"*(-() *(
"
-

(*(
"
"'!

"
(.((*(

]Idde]Idd
hIPLQR5SNNiZ9NT:U'"*(-
*,/ %
!
0(''*

VWW6NTTNWX67YN67Z[Q9I\g^\j`:
--!
* !*("%/ %
-
kbC?-
!*,
/
*l !"("%

(*(
"+/ %

!
0(''-
!

(*(
"

3456789:;<=('"*(-() *(
"
-/ %
-
!

(*(
"
+
;<=/ %
m$ *
n* *("($&;<=)
(*"*
*
/ %
m$ *
G
"*!
F
$"*
(0("%/ %&;<=
)
(*"**
/ %
%! *!*, "G
"*!
F
$"*

(0("%/ % gIddegIdd
gIPLQR5SNNoN8NO7YT:U'"*(-
*,."-(*
!
0('' *

&(")$'("%, *,) !&0 ) *(
"& "' '() 0&*
*,'%!*,
!
--!'
!*

"*
VWW6NTTNWX67YN67Z[Q9I\j^\p`:, *,("
$! ") )
0! %&/(*,-$l*(

!)(0("%>?@ )
0! %
-*,(!!($
"' !*l*(

!)(0("% , *,) !
*("'
!*,
*(
"*
q
("*, )
"
1 "+D

) " !*()( *("*, '"* ) !!
%! &/(*,-$l*(

!)(0("%>?@)
0! %
-*,(!!($
+0(
(
" ("
$! ")*

&)
0!("%??@
-
!($
-
!-$l*(

+r2(.n"'("%
D))
$"*;rnD=+G *!"(*
st *!"(*
u 0+v?w !*(!"*
0("%
"-
!-$l*(

&
*),("%>?@
-

)
"*!(.$*(
"
$*
x@
-
*,(!
!
+

!)(0 ?@'(
)
$"*
" !
'$)*
+t ('y(z--st ('{
('

+n()B#

+
('*(
---
!0
$"*!("%+|")
"
*'y(
z--+|"(
"G.!
,(
3456789:;<=, *,) !!
0(''-
! !*l*(

+;<=, *,) !!
0(''-
!-$l*(

&;<=)
(*"**
>?@
-!($
&
hIddegIdd
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 86, Packet Page 178

!"#$%%&#'()*+,-* *'./*#'0#"*,*%+12 3
45

4

54
3

7))-%++%)8-*/%-*.9!:
;;<1

=3

4

>?

4
3
A6

4
3

3BBCD

@

3

3 4
3

=

@

4
A

H,#-*':1ID

J
KKLJ
KK
M#/."1N;
KKLJK
KK

H%,/*#'O1P#,."'/%-!-*+%.')':.:% %'/0".'9QK0#*'/+M#/."< N
8# R'*/$':.:% %'/1S

3
4
3

6

T3

T

7))-%++%)8-*/%-*.9!:
UK(UV<1

4
3

6

=

33
@3

@5

3

@

>
4 3

3
3

5
3

3
5@

35

W

=

4
3
3
>X

5Y

@4
3

Z
F
[
>

5

=

3

3

3 4
3

=

A\3 S

@] 4
D

X

5@^

_5
X

@

@

33 @

3

3

5

=

5

3

4
3

=

5b
3S

@\
\

D

@
D

5b

\

5

3

NK
KKLNK
KK
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 87, Packet Page 179

!"#$%&'()*

+

+

+()*

+()*,

+()*

-

+()*

+()*

. /01+222

345"667%$89:;$&%6<%8'=

>
:45"%%<!8$"%8"8?<5$89@AB$;$898"C<#D<8?< 5$89@EA6$;$A#$89F$8?8?<5$89@A%G $%%"DA8$D<B7C$%<CC6"G<;C!"%C$C8<%8F$8? HIJKLHMNOPQRRSTLHM:GG#<CC<G5#$8<#$AUV&4WXYZ[\]'^ _

+,=
`

a

bc
+

d

e

-f

+

g

+

+

+

^
_

!"#$%&'()*

+
()*

()*
e

+
+

+()*

+()*

g

+

X4[[iX4[[
j4:B$;$898"!"%E"#6F$8?8?<KLHMNOkJTJlmn
o;A%@A%9AVV;$!AB;<CV<!$E$!V;A%C@A%G G<C$&%C8A%GA#GC :GG#<CC<G5#$8<#$AUV&4Z[\YZZZ]'

+

g

`
-

+

+

X4[[iX4[[
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 88, Packet Page 180

!"#$%&'()*

+
,-."!/0123$%4335/#6%4#37$83'9

:

;<<#4334<=#$64#$/>8&-???@??,A'

:

:

C

E
D

!"#$%&'()F*

+
?G-GGH?G-GG
I"6/0',G-GGH,G-GG

4!6$"%J' 236/$%/K$0$6L>MG5"$%63I"6/0A
?- 236/$%/K04/%<NO2$6/K04123$%4335#/!6$!43'9

P

;- 6483674!/%%/K$3K23$%433Q$006/R46" #4<2!4674!/#K"%S""68#$%6"S!/%%/K$3KL #4<2!$%&&#44%7"234&/34T$33$"%3
;<<#4334<=#$64#$/>8&-??,@??UA'

VWWX

:

Z-GGHZ-GG
ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 89, Packet Page 181

!"#$%

&

()*+,

-+++
.
,+
/01

2,3,10
0-
4 1.
5+013
+,1
-+
436+6
17+8

9+1:0,
+;0<84+=
<<
1<+11
>??*+
1 5
+6=
<

<3<8+
+10 +
5
@,
1++4+1

1.
++
01 =

,104401

5?A70
+
,=
+1)B
C66
+,,+6D

0:8 )EEF@EEGB!

HIIJ

'

'

"KLM%

HIJ

&N

OPQR &

S

S

T

S
N

S

S
'&

S&

WXY
ZXY

&

'

'&
&

&

S

[

!"#X%

&

E\)\\2E\)\\
D)1+8,17+00-
,-3,
+,,]
4410^+1
+,3
+17+00-
,
1
++
/+,
,,
3 +6 5

<341
/01

,2<035013
+
,1701
8 /
6+,05+]

^

6 1

,0680.
]0 +,1
40-

+
,5

]

^8+
5 <+6 C66
+,,+6D

0:8 )EE_@E`\B!

'

&
S

V
S

'

&

a
&

S

&

'

b c
Sd

&e&
f
'
&S
U

'

&

a
&

L

&

b

a

&

'

&

'

'&

a

&

'

&

'

K

g"#$%

&

!"#$%

&

h)\\2h)\\
i
104! `\)\\2`\)\\

ATTACHMENT 11
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 90, Packet Page 182

"
#

$

%&'()*+,-./01&23445*('+6-'/17893 :;<;= >
?
? @==<==

A@<B;C$

>
?
?D

E
$

FG
D

H

I
JK

F81M(&*016N1 OPQRSTQQUVSTWXQYWRUWTZYTWRTS[TRSUVSRS\]^_S_\RS\] '+`a41&'6*+,'51,'55b41&/*661`a&5*(1+M1`&16'*5
('++'0*M0.M*+1MM*+6N1c+*61`d6'61Mea&a6N1&0.M*+1MM *+'M*/*5'&5bd6'61&1,.5'61`'(6*f*6b
??

H#KJ
ghijkgIFal+1&Ml*6N@m b1'&Man('++'0*M*+`.M6&b1o41&*1+(1panqal+1&M l*6N4&*a&&16'*5('++'0*M1o41&*1+(1pal+1&l*6N 1o41&*1+(1*+d6'61&1,.5'61`'(6*f*6*1Mp@a41&'6*a+'5 &16'*55a('6*a+Mpq('++'0*M/'+.n'(6.&*+,0.M*+1MM1M $

#Frmqs/a&16N'+;tB;Cal+1&MN*461'/l*6N 1o41&*1+(1*+u'++'0*Ma&d6'61&1,.5'61`'(6*f*6berm@s =tvb1'&Man('++'0*M1o41&*1+(1erms@&16'*5
5a('6*a+M
wKDJK
K

x
?
y
>
?#
F81M(&*01ba.&
af1&'55)+al51`,1an6N1('++'0*M*+`.M6&be*+(5.`*+,
*`1+6*n*('6*a+anNal*+`.M6&b01M64&'(6*(1M'+` d6'61&1,.5'6*a+MN'f1011+*+(a&4a&'61`*+ 1o*M6*+,74&*a&51,'50.M*+1MM1Ma.6M*`16N1u*6ban za+61&1b
??

H#Kw
{IF|o(146*a+'5
.+`1&M6'+`*+,an6N1('++'0*M*+`.M6&b<}&af*`1M'+ 1oN'.M6*f1'+`(a/4&1N1+M*f1af1&f*1lan*+`.M6&b 01M64&'(6*(1M'+`M6'61&1,.5'6*a+Me*+(5.`*+,+.'+(1` *+M*,N6M'+`'`f'+(1`'+'5bM*M<81/a+M6&'61M' Ma4N*M6*('61`.+`1&M6'+`*+,anNal&1,.5'6*a+M'&1 *+(a&4a&'61`*+6a1o*M6*+,a&4&*a&51,'50.M*+1MM1Me l*6N1o1/45'&b1o'/451M'+`*+t`146N'+'5bM*M<
$

#F|o(146*a+'5rm=st'445*('+6`1/a+M6&'61M
1o(146*a+'5)+al51`,1an6N1('++'0*M*+`.M6&b<91M6
4&'(6*(1Meu*6b'+`d6'61&1,.5'6*a+M&1n1&1+(1` 6N&a.,Na.66N11+6*&1'445*('6*a+ JKDJK
~K">

E
x

81M(&*016N1 *+fa5f1/1+6an6N1al+1&MN*461'/*+6N1`'bt6at`'b a41&'6*a+'+`/'+',1/1+6an6N14&a4aM1`0.M*+1MM
??

H#K{
IFl+1&MN*461'/ (a/4&*M1`anu|z*)1z1))eu8&<3&'MN-'b1&*e '+`u7ua//.+*6b*'*Ma+1++'}'66a+d1M/'p
z*)1taf1&M11*+,'55'M41(6Man6N1(a/4'+bM
a41&'6*a+Me4&af*`1MN'+`Mta+,.*`'+(16a1+M.&1 M1'/51MM`'*5ba41&'6*a+Me(a/45*'+(1l*6N &1,.5'6*a+Me'+`6N11M6'05*MN/1+6anM6&a+, &15'6*a+MN*4Ml*6Nf1+`a&M'+`(a+6&'(6a&Mp8&<3&'MN -'b1&*tn*+'+(*'5M.44a&6'+`M6&'61,*(`*&1(6*a+6a6N1 (a/4'+bpna(.M/'b+a601a+`'bt6at`'ba41&'6*a+Me N*MM6&'61,*(f*M*a+'+`1o41&6*M1*+/1`*(*+1 (a+6&*0.616a1`.('6*a+'5a.6&1'(N*+*6*'6*f1M'0a.6 6N16N1&'41.6*(01+1n*6Man('++'0*Me(a/0'6*+,
M6*,/'e'+`4&a/a6*+,'4aM*6*f1+'&&'6*f1'&a.+`*6M
.M1p1++'t4&*/'&b4a*+6an(a+6'(6na&(aa&`*+'6*+, l*6N6N15a('5(a//.+*6beM41'&N1'`*+,5a('5N*&*+,

KDJK
ATTACHMENT 12
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 91, Packet Page 183

!"#$
%

&'(
)*++

,-.*
/
)
,/

+01
,

2 3
% % 4%
%

%%
4

%
3 3
566
*++*6.

,78'9:;<= >?@ABABB
A C
DB

>
E
F G
%H
> FI

J K>%A?IL>IB I KMNF

>%D%D3
>

3
?
2
%A F
%DK2O
H

2%A
%P3
J F
%A

%

%
J %>%
G
O
!J>GO$K % Q
E
%
O>
%>
K
R

MF 2H

%
R
3 >?@ABABB

!"S$
%% %

%

%%
T'<<0;<'<<
1/,- UU'<<0&<'<<

*/

V VW+

*++(-,
7&<(

/+1/,-=
;'VW+

*++X8*
,/

+ 2 3

3 %
%3 3

%
%

Y

5'ZW
+)X8*
,/

566
*++*6.

,78';;=
% ##K

!"[$

>

;'<<0;'<<
V'\),88-
,]-*^/_*.W+/`*
_*a:

8
*++ 566
*++*6.

,78';;:;U= F

b2
B K
b2%
3N@F

Fb2 3 K>

L2 B

b2
K [

b2
%
C K
> N% 3

N@FKO

LF O 3
B
3L %%K

!"[$
B R> Fc K
%[

!
de$
;'<<0;'<<
ATTACHMENT 12
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 92, Packet Page 184

!"
# $% !%& '( $%& '!
)
!#*
+

,./
.01234546789:;<= 4>37?@A37B87ABCDEFGHCI3DA@7HJH37KIC@ LCKM@7N7>H4O7M@CBPL33@ALQ4>?R87ABCDEFGHJH37K H7AK57HH5J4>37?@A37H37LN>C5C?JIC@4>O7>3C@JA>B LPH3CK7@KA>A?7K7>3RS7>7@A37HHA57H@7LC@BH AP3CKA34LA55JA>BM@CO4B7H@7A5=34K74>H4?N3HIC@
4>IC@K7BB7L4H4C>=KAQ4>?RTAL4543A37H7II4L47>3
4>O7>3C@J3@ALQ4>?A>BAP3CKA37B>C34I4LA34C>HIC@
5CD=H3CLQ437KHRUA45J54K43HCP354>7BIC@ABP53=PH7A>B K7B4L4>A5LPH3CK7@HR:@A>HAL34C>H@7LC@B7B H4KP53A>7CPH5J4>87ABCDA>BH3A3789:;<:@ALQA>B :@AL7GJH37KRVEFGH3A34C>H4>H3A557B3C ALLCKKCBA37M@CW7L37BLPH3CK7@OC5PK7R9XM@7HH E4LQPMA@7AIC@M@7=M@7MA@7BC@B7@HY

Z[\]Y^_EFG>AK7`[\a_B7HL@4M34C>CINCD43
4>37@AL3HD43N89:;<`[\]Y^_bCIEFGH3A34C>H
cddecdd
fghi'h#jkl $'!ilmm!
!"
& '( $%

n -

,.0
.o187ABCDEFGHJH37K pqrstuvrswwsvxyswwyz{pr|}vyp~uqpvw}uv = A>B=:@AL7HJH37KR9O7@JH3A?7CILA>>A4HM@CBPL3
54I7LJL57BCLPK7>37B`7>HP@4>?LCKM54A>L7A>B B737@@4>?4554L43AL34O4347HR2MBA37HKAB73C89:;< :@ALQA>B:@AL7ALLCP>3AP3CKA34LA55J3N@CP?N 87ABCDEFGHJH37KR;7LC@B=Q77M4>?4>L5PB7H@7L74M3 CILA>>A4HM@CBPL3H`@7W7L34C>H`KCO7K7>3H`
MP@LNAH7H`@73P@>H`A>BDAH37B4HMCHA5RU73A457B 4>IC@KA34C>@7LC@B7B4>:@ALQ=A>B=:@AL789:;< @7LC@BHIC@LCKM54A>L7RFD>7@84Q787QQCO7@H77H 89:;<ALLCP>3HJH37KKA>A?7K7>3A>BH3AII
3@A4>4>?Y

1[\a_B73A457B7XM5A>A34C>M@CO4B7B
.dde.dd

,
n
,

,

-

,.o
cd187ABCDEFGHJH37K H7AK57HH5J4>37?@A37HD43NP4LQCCQHHCI3DA@73C CM34K467I4>A>L4A5CM7@A34C>HRP4LQCCQHMAJ@C55 KA>A?7K7>3`3AXI454>?H`A>B7XM7>H73@ALQ4>?`
7>HP@4>?M@7L4H4C>A>BLCKM54A>L7RKA>A?7HO7>BC@
MAJK7>3H`3@ALQH7XM7>B43P@7H`A>BKA4>3A4>H
3@A>HMA@7>3I4>A>L4A5@7LC@BHRUA45JAPB43HLC>BPL37B J3N7S7>7@A58A>A?7@@7LC>L457LAHNC>NA>BD43N HA57H@7LC@BH`7>HP@4>?ALLP@ALJR>>PA5APB43HA@7 M7@IC@K7BJ3N4@B=MA@3JALLCP>34>?H7@O4L7H3CO7@4IJ 3N7ALLP@ALJCII4>A>L4A5@7LC@BH

1[\a_<CKM@7N7>H4O7B7HL@4M34C>M@CO4B7B
.dde.dd

n,

,

-

,cd1AMM@CX4KA375J] LPH3CK7@HBA45J`4>L@7AH4>?3C]4>J7A@^R= LPH3CK7@HM7@NCP@R

1[\a_7H34KA34C>M@CO4B7BRHPMMC@37BJL57A@
@76C>4>?A>BKA@Q73A>A5JH4H
.dde.dd
,
, ,

,

-

,c.
c1B4O7@H7A>B4>L5PH4O7 H757L34C>CILA>>A4HM@CBPL3HI@CK@A>BHQ>CD>IC@ M@4C@43464>?7BPLA34C>`HAI73J`A>BLCKM54A>L7R
K734LP5CPH5J@7O47DM@CBPL34C>M@AL34L7H`LCKM54A>L7 @7LC@BH`37H34>?@7HP53H`A>BLPH3CK7@I77BALQ3C 7>HP@7M@CBPL3PA543JA>BHAI73JR4>434A55JCII7@ MCMP5A@@A>BHDN457A5HCHPMMC@34>?5CLA5L@AI3
.dde.dd
ATTACHMENT 12
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 93, Packet Page 185

"#$%&

"'(%&"'#%&
")#%&

"*+$%&"%&

",+$%&

"'%&

+
-./01234"5'&6

7

89:/.;<1/2=>?;2@A0/.B@C0B>D/00B.B1E123
@BF1EB01B>@C0123GC>12B>>H/C0>
I@@0B>>B@J01<B01;=A39KLMKN?4O

PQ
PR

S

7

R

U
O

O

7

+
-./01234"5'&

V9WWXV9WW
Y9YD;AAF1.;GFBZ@B>.01GB@BF1EB0[>B0E1.B A0/.B@C0B>Z2C\GB0/DEBH1.FB>Z;2@ A0/@C.<>B.C01<[@C0123<0;2>A/0<;<1/2 I@@0B>>B@J01<B01;=A39KNM]]?4

)

-./01234"5'&Q

V9WWXV9WW
^98/_<HBJ;22;G1>`C>12B>>_1FF./2D/0\</F/.;F
;2@><;<BF;_>9-BBaaJJH;A<B0bZI0<1.FBb;><HB[
AB0<;12</0B<;1FB><;GF1>H\B2<>12<HBJ1<[/D
a/2<B0B[
I@@0B>>B@J01<B01;=A39]]McK?4!

-./01234"5'&

V9WWXV9WW
d98/_.;22;G1>;2@.;22;G1>A0/@C.<>_1FFGB <0;.eB@;2@\/21</0B@</A0BEB2<@1EB0>1/2 I@@0B>>B@J01<B01;=A39cKMcc?4
7

6

f
g!h6!
7
!

V9WWXV9WW
ATTACHMENT 12
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 94, Packet Page 186

$
%&'()*+,-./0

123456('6'7589:7;5<:*:+5<5*;6=:*>)*&=?8)*+ 9:7;58)76'7:=='&:;)'*7>75&?();@<5:7?(57>
<5;4'87'A(5*85()*+:==9:7;5?*?7:B=5:*8 ?*(5&'+*)C:B=5>:*8;45D5*8'()*&4:(+5'A8)76'7:= E88(57758F();5():G6+2HHIHJK,

N M
O
O

PO#OO

"
$
%&'()*+,-.Q0

H2RRSH2RR
T23456('6'758'8'(&'*;('=6=:*;'6(5D5*;:*@
'8'(+5*5(:;58)*7)85;45='&:;)'*A('<B5)*+
85;5&;58'*:8U:&5*;6('65(;)57'(6?B=)&()+4;7I'AI
9:@>'(9);4)*:*@';45(?*);='&:;589);4)*;45 7:<5B?)=8)*+:7;45&:**:B)7B?7)*577)A;45 &:**:B)7B?7)*577'&&?6)57'*=@:6'(;)'*'A: B?)=8)*+
E88(57758F();5():G6+2HVIJWK,

XYO

O

"

-OZ0

"

"

$
%&'()*+,-.Q0

H2RRSH2RR
W2[)*:*&57,
E2\('D)85:B?8+5;A'(&'*7;(?&;)'*>
'65(:;)'*7><:)*;5*:*&5>&'<65*7:;)'*'A
5<6='@557>5]?)6<5*;>6('65(;@=5:75>
75&?();@5]?)6<5*;:*87;:AA>F);@A557>
E88(57758F();5():G6+2H^IJW0_
`/$a

`/$Q

`bcc

J2RRSJ2RR
ATTACHMENT 12
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 95, Packet Page 187

!"
#
!
$
%&'$&

!#"&

()"

#
)*$+!

*&
*#'%!

$)*"#'
!
)*
$"#'!
,
#!#-
)#"%"#'$&
#

*&,)$#

)*$+!

!
,&#+*!
#"$"
!#,$&
#
.!"
#& !"
#!"
"#
$&

#*)$#"&
/),0#1"#+"
23444441"#+ !

#" !#,$&
#&-2544
*
()!*-&&#-&*!

*&
*#'&-!

*&" !#%'5444
()!*-#.
6 *!#"&
!%$&
#
-&*#+-"*
#
" &
#+
!*
*&7$#, !#28838593 &
#+%'"
$%),"
0
%&' $&

!#"&
*
#)#"%"#"
!
,
$)*"#'

.
:

;<=>?$&
*+

"@/),0#
)

%
#,/'
!*A#!
!%'
"
.
)--"$"
#$!
"#!%
BCD

F
GH

F
D

D

H

IH

JKLMNOPCQRR

STU;2V9W "%%"&
"
!$$

"/%-)
,
!
@",
$,/'
,&$)
#!#"&

*&@",,"
XYZZ"%[3
:

;<=>?,#!"%,
*&&-&-$!
"#!%"\!#"&

*&@",,.
-)
,"
0"
-)%%'
)--"$"
#-&*
*&
&
,/),0#
K]]^K]]
HCD

IH

JNLMNKU;
:

;<=>? #"$)%&)
!
,,#!"%,>_'!*
*&-&* !
/!$A,/' !*A#!
!%'
"

K]]^K]]
QCD

IH

JK`MKaU;!"
#&&

!
, $&
$&
*!#"&

1"#+"
V5_V> &
#+
-&%%&1"
0
%&$!%!

*&@!%.b-#*#+!

%"$!#"&

*&$

"
"#"!%
-&$)
1"%%/&

$)*"
0!%&$!#"&
.c)/
()
#%'
--&*#
1"%%/,"*$#,#&1!*,
#+*A'-!$#
d
e"$

"
0f&

#*)$#"&
!
,6
*!#"&

9e"$

"
0
"
@&%@
&/#!"
"
0@!*"&)

* "#
!
,%"$

-*& #+$"#'!
,
#!#1"#+$&

#*)$#"&
/"
0#+%&
0
#

+!
.
%!

#&
0!0%&$!%/)
"

-&*
$&

#*)$#"&
!
,*
&@!#"&
1&*A.6
*!#"&

"
$%),
#!--*$*)"#
#
*&,)$#
#&$A"
0!
,#*!"
"

0.g+ $&
!
'!"
#&$&
%##+&

"
0
*&$

-!
#*
#+!

*&7$#,%@*!0"
0"
#"
0
*&
*#'&
#"&

!*!%%%
*&$

"
0&-#!
A
!
,
&#
#"!%
,"#, $"#'
*&$

9
:

;<=3?f&
*+

"@
$+,)%
*&@",,9
b

%"$!
#
#+!#*$"@,-)%%
&"
#,$& "##,#& &

"
0"
&
#+

T]]^K]]

;La]]^T]]]

:

H;:

C
JT]C

U
h:

C
;g+b

%"$!#"&
)
#"
$%),!

$)*"#'
%!

*
!*,/'!()!%"-",
*&-

"&
!%9
g+
$)*"#'
%!
$!
/
*
!*,1"#+"
_+&)

#!--
&*!#+"*,_
!*#'
$)*"#'$&

)%#!
#/)# )
#$%!*%'
, &

#*!##+!#"# #
#+()!%"-",
*&-

"&
!%

#!
,!*,#&*$"@#+!

*&
*"!#
&"
#
-&*!$+ $*"#*"&
"
#+"

$#"&
9g+b

%"$!
# )
#!%
&
)/ "##+()!%"-"$!#"&

&-#+
*
&
<
?
*
!*"
0
#+
$)*"#'#&@*"-'#+!##+' ##+()!%"-",
*&-

"&
!%
#!
,!*,
9
IH

JN`MNiU;$&
#*!$#,1"#+f!**&%%
c$)*"#'
f&

)%#"
0eef<j!##f!**&%%e"$

[V>3>?:

;
<=V?
$)*"#'
%!
,@%&
,/'()!%"-",#+"*,_
!*#'

*&-

"&
!%

h]]^h]]
ATTACHMENT 12
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 96, Packet Page 188

!
"
#$
!"
%&"

(

))**+

*
,*
-.
*

/

0
1- **
)--**-+

23456789
&!:!'
;
<
:

'='

!
%

; '!
#
>" !%

: =
'!
#<!!<

& %
!!
'=
?#

!<!!&'!'

$<
:@#<
: !

!"

!!
!#=A

<!!&!
%%$
>

& %<!!&B""
%
:>
=C"

'
"
DE#
!<!!

& !!
<

: '=F
!>

<!!&! #

: :
"

'

:G
! =G

'
<!!'
!
@
"
'
%'

'<!!

=HI

"<!!
>
!>

%
:
"%:%

I
$<
:

I
>
&"!B" <
:

!
@
%

"
"
:
J

3KLMNOP&

!#
'$KLMNOP

> !!

$KLMNOP!'
$
KLMNOP
"
'
%
%

!!
%
>

$KLEP"
@#

!#
'$
KLMNOP>

"
!
%&$KLMNOP
>

& %

!
QRRSQRR
TU
/

3 )--**-+

2378679V
!#

"%:

&
"

'
!#'
<!!& > ! &!
!

:
! $<
:

!

"

"!#=W>

<!!

&! #

:
! $

"
'!
<!!&:!>
"

:
"

'=X !

&<!!

!#&!>

>" ! %EY

!<
:> !

=C !

C

&
Z @;
;Z KCCZZP#
'

@
>

#
'
>'

&
"

<!!

"

%"!
>

# "
=
#%

!

"
#
& :<!!&

#[
! \
'

!
:
>

' "

!"& @%
"
:@
!!
$
:&

%

$B"
%'!
#

:
!#$'

%'!
#'
>'

$

%>

;
$
>
%<:
!&!
<

$
'

%

%
>!
^"%'

'
!

3(KLMNOP&
>

#'
%'

#
'$KLMNOP
"
"
$KLMNOP "

%
B"
#
:

:K%_DP$KLMNOP

"
"
#
"$KLMNOP!'
B"

&$KLMNOP"
"

%
!
@ ! # $KLMNOP
''
'

> "!

K%Y`P=KLMNOP
"

%! <

N
QRRSQRR
+) ,*
, )--**-+

23767a9

!!
%
'

% '

!;
' ! '#
'$
QRRSQRR
ATTACHMENT 12
Council Regular Meeting, 5/21/2024, Item No. 14., Item Page 97, Packet Page 189

!
!!"#$%&!$&!'(#)* +,

-.

.
/ 0

1
2
3
4
5.

4-
5
6 3
37
./ 0
1
2

8 .
/
4
/ - 9- 7

8-.
:;/-5
-

8-.
-
.

./
-5 <.- -

-
5
= <

Monterey City CouncilMay 21, 2024

Monterey City Council
May 21, 2024