Agenda packet — Monterey City Council, April 1, 2025

Council Chamber
580 Pacific St.

Monterey, California
and Field Trip from Council
Chamber to 351 Madison St.
at 5:30 p.m. (see Item 10)

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Council Regular Meeting
Amended Agenda
Tuesday, April 1, 2025
4:00 PM – 6:00 PM
7:00 PM – 10:30 PM
Mayor
Tyller Williamson
Councilmembers
Kim Barber, District 1
Ed Smith, District 2
Jean Rasch, District 3
Gino Garcia, District 4
City Manager
Hans Uslar
City Attorney
M. Christine Davi
HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING:
 In-Person: At the meeting location listed above.
 Remotely via ZoomGov webinar (except during Field Trip):
o On a computer or smartphone: https://monterey-org.zoomgov.com/j/1607729333 Zoom software must be up-to-date. For help, please use our Zoom Meeting Instructions. o By telephone dial 833-568-8864 (Toll Free), 669-254-5252 (CA) or 646-828-7666 (NY). If one number doesn’t work, please try another. Enter Webinar ID: 160 772 9333 # If asked for participant ID, press #. To raise your hand: dial *9. Once called upon, dial *6 to unmute.  This meeting (except during Field Trip) will also stream live for viewing only on youtube.com/cityofmonterey (~10 second delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90 second delay).
 Written comment: Emailed comments to [email protected] sent no later than ½ hour before the start of the meeting (sooner preferred) are not read aloud but are made available to the Council and public at monterey.gov/submitted-comments.

PUBLIC COMMENT PROCEDURES AND TIME LIMITS:

The total amount of time allocated for public comment on a particular issue and for each individual speaker is generally as follows:

1. Up to three minutes per speaker.

2. For regular City Council meetings, there are two 15-minute public comment periods, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. Speakers may only comment during one session.

3. The total time allocated for public comment:
a. 30 minutes per item – Public Appearance and Public Hearing items b. 15 minutes per item – All other items (including, but not limited to, Consent, Closed Session, Presentations, and Requests to Agendize)
At the time an item is considered, the Mayor will ask those attending the meeting in person to line up at the podium or raise their hands, and for remote participants to use *9 on the telephone or the “raise hand” function in Zoom, if they wish to address the City Council. The maximum amount of time for each person to speak and the total amount of time allotted for each item will be determined based on the number of people indicating an interest in speaking and the amount of business to be conducted on the agenda. In exceptional circumstances and when necessary to ensure a full opportunity for public input, the Mayor may, with the legislative body’s consent, adjust the amount of time allowed for public input and/or the time allotted for each speaker.

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt. Code §84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $500 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and April 1, 2025
2 agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made.

Teleconference Notice
A “Just Cause” teleconference attendance notification was received from Councilmember Smith, who will make a brief statement at the beginning of the meeting regarding the general description of the circumstances requiring remote participation.

AFTERNOON SESSION: 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.

Call to Order
Presentations (Afternoon)

1. Recognize the 15th Anniversary of Whalefest Monterey (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

2. Receive a Presentation on Pension Management Strategy and Long-Term Financial Plan (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
General Public Comments
The public may speak to any item that is not on the agenda and that is in the City of Monterey’s subject matter jurisdiction.

Consent Agenda
All matters listed under Consent Agenda are routine and will be adopted by one motion unless a member of the City Council or the public requests discussion or a separate vote.

Consent: Approval of Minutes

3. March 18, 2025 Regular Meeting (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Consent: Award of Construction Contracts

4. Awarding a Construction Contract in the Amount of $2,034,807.22 to McKim Corporation for the Citywide Road Surface Repair Project 24/25 (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1)
Consent: Ordinances
An ordinance is a law adopted by the City Council and codified in the City Code. Through the adoption of an ordinance, the City may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other laws not in conflict with state or federal law. An ordinance generally becomes effective 30 days after approval at a second reading.

5. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 8, Sections 2.02 and 2.03 Relating to the Rental Inventory Program Exempt Properties Reporting and Fee Pass-Through (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
April 1, 2025
3 Consent: Resolutions
A resolution is an expression of opinion or evidence of a decision made by the City Council and often relates to administrative business of the City. Resolutions generally become effective immediately upon adoption.

6. Authorize the Finance Director to Appropriate $800,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Ending Balance Account to Previously Approved NCIP Forest Management and Fuel Reduction Project ***NCIP*** (Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on October 25, 2022)

7. Authorize the City Manager to Sign an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement One Year Extension with MidPen Housing for Development of Affordable Housing at 587 and 593 Van Buren Street, 424 and 450 Madison Street (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) End of Consent Agenda
Afternoon Session Items
Public Hearing (Afternoon)
Public Hearings are held to receive a staff presentation and public comment on certain items prior to City Council action. NOTICE CONCERNING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS: If you challenge the City Council’s zoning, planning, or land use decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing on the matter, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at the time of or prior to the public hearing. (Government Code section 65009.)

8. Extend Urgency Ordinance No. 3696 to Temporarily Prohibit the Establishment and Operation of New Firearms and Ammunitions Retail Sales Businesses in the City for 10-Months and 15-Days Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

9. Amending and Restating Resolution 24-018, The Master Fee Schedule, to Update the Community Development, Fire Department, Parks and Recreation, Library and Museums, Police Department, Public Works Department, Parking Division, and Harbor Division Fees (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Study Session
This Study Session will be held as a FIELD TRIP to the City's public safety facilities, Monterey Police Department and Monterey Fire Department, located at 351 Madison St., Monterey, CA 93940. The Council and public will meet and convene outside the ADA-accessible entrance to the City Council Chamber at 580 Pacific St., Monterey at 5:30 p.m. and will cross the street together to visit the facilities at 351 Madison Street. No transportation is provided.

Study Session items are used to provide information to the City Council and answer their questions to clarify issues. Study Sessions provide a setting for informal discussions between staff, consultants, board, commission, committee members and the City Council regarding specific programs, projects or policies. Council does not take formal action on the items.

10. Conduct Council Field Trip to the Central Public Safety Facility (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Recess
April 1, 2025
4 Reconvene
EVENING SESSION AGENDA: 7 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.

No discussion of a new item will be started after 10:30 p.m. unless agreed upon by Council.

Pledge of Allegiance
General Public Comments, Continued
Any person who did not offer a general public comment in the afternoon session may speak to any item that is not on the agenda and that is in the City of Monterey’s subject matter jurisdiction.

Evening Session Items
Presentations (Evening)

11. Receive a Presentation on the Monterey Public Safety Facility Feasibility Study (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

12. Receive Police Department Annual Report - 2024 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

13. Receive Annual Report of the Police Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) System (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Public Appearance (Evening)
Public Appearance items are on non-routine issues that might stimulate public interest and comments.

14. Receive Annual Report and Renew the Military Equipment Purchase and Use Ordinance – Monterey City Code, Chapter 27, Article 3, Section 27-10, and Authorize the Acquisition of Additional Military Equipment Including a Crisis Negotiating Team Command Vehicle, Four Unmanned Aerial Systems, and Replace Eight Patrol Rifles (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Council Comments
Councilmembers may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on their activities. In addition, Councilmember or the City Council may provide a referral to staff or other resources for factual information. (Government Code section 54954.2(a)(3).)
City Manager Reports
The City Manager may make a brief report on their activities or a brief announcement. They may also ask for clarification or direction regarding scheduling of Council meetings and study sessions.

Adjournment
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on these matters within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, are available at: monterey.gov/submitted-comments and in the City Manager’s Office at 580 Pacific St., Room 1, Monterey, CA 93940 during regular business hours. All comments and materials provided to the Council become part of the public record. Members of the public who April 1, 2025
5 comment in any fashion on an agenda item may be subject to the Levine Act which requires disclosure of campaign contributions of more than $500 to an officer of the City within the preceding 12 months.

INTERPRETATION: The Monterey City Council invites and encourages public participation at its meetings.

Requests for language interpretation may be made by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 831-646-3935. The City Clerk will make every effort to accommodate requests for interpreter assistance.

Requests should be made as soon as possible in advance of any meeting of the City Council. The City is committed to addressing language interpretation requests swiftly in order to maximize public participation.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of Monterey is committed to including disabled people in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact [email protected] or (831) 646-3935.

Notification 30+ hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.

CITY OF MONTEREY 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES: (831) 646-3799 or [email protected] Upcoming city meetings are listed at monterey.gov/agendas For more information, call (831) 646-3935 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Hans Uslar, City Manager
Prepared By: Hayley Goodwein, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Recognize the 15th Anniversary of Whalefest Monterey (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council recognize the 15th Anniversary of Whalefest Monterey.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources
through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining
operations, reasonable revenue enhancements,
visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and
community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City of Monterey recognizes and celebrates the
15th anniversary of Whalefest Monterey. This event
celebrates the many years of accomplishments and
contributions of Whalefest Monterey and the
Fisherman’s Wharf Association to the local community
in the way of education, inspiration, and conservation
of the Monterey Bay.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no costs incurred in connection with supporting this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is set to recognize
the 15th anniversary of Whalefest
Monterey.
 Whalefest Monterey is a two-day
event held on April 12 and 13, 2025,
at Custom House Plaza and Old
Fisherman’s Wharf.
 The event attracts over 10,000
attendees and features exhibits, a
Symposium with renowned
scientists, and activities focused on
marine conservation.
 Whalefest Monterey celebrates the
relationship between the City of
Monterey and the Monterey Bay
National Marine Sanctuary.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 1, Packet Page 6 environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could choose to not recognize the 15th anniversary of Whalefest Monterey; however, that is not recommended.

DISCUSSION:

Whalefest Monterey is celebrating the 15th anniversary of the two-day Whalefest Monterey event on April 12 and 13, 2025 in the Custom House Plaza and the Old Fisherman’s Wharf.

With the backdrop of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Whalefest Monterey is an event that combines science, art, and history, drawing in over 10,000 people to Monterey specifically for the occasion.

The event features exhibits for all ages, designed to inspire, educate, explore, and empower attendees to take action to conserve and protect the local environment, for visitors and inhabitants of all species. Over the course of the two days, Whalefest holds a Symposium where renowned scientists from marine science research institutions share cutting-edge research and conservation efforts in a wide range of topics including whales, sea otters, kelp, sharks, and more. Whalefest Monterey also highlights the important relationship between the City of Monterey and the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary.

The City of Monterey is proud to recognize and celebrate Whalefest Monterey and their accomplishments over the last 15 years.

Attachments: 1. Proclamation
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 2, Packet Page 7 ATTACHMENT 1
Proclamation Congratulating
Whalefest Monterey
in honor of their 15th Anniversary
WHEREAS, Whalefest Monterey is celebrating the 15th Anniversary of the two-day Whalefest Monterey event on April 12 and 13, 2025 in the Custom House Plaza Monterey State Historic Park and the Old Fisherman’s Wharf, as presented by the Fisherman’s Wharf Association; and, WHEREAS, with the backdrop of the beautiful Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Whalefest Monterey is an event that combines science, art, and history, designed to inspire, educate, explore, and empower attendees of all ages, featuring exhibits related to marine science, sustainability of land and sea, and the environment; and,
WHEREAS, Whalefest Monterey features a Symposium where world renowned scientists from prestigious marine science research institutions share cutting-edge research and conservation efforts with the public over the course of the two days. These presentations cover a wide range of topics, including whales, sea otters, sharks, kelp, and more; and,
WHEREAS, as a free event, Whalefest features activities for all ages, including Wharf History Walks, Abalone Races, various arts and crafts like gyotaku printing and origami, calamari cooking demonstrations, tours of research and rescue vessels including The Shelia B from the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories and The Pearl from Monterey Fire Department; and, WHEREAS, Whalefest Monterey highlights the important relationship our city has with the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and its inhabitants. The economic impact of tourism to the area to enjoy the beautiful ocean and to take part in various recreational activities like whale watching, scuba diving, kayaking, fishing, and sailing cannot be understated; and, WHEREAS, Whalefest Monterey is a beacon shining light on how a community can take action to conserve and protect the environment, for visitors and inhabitants of all species; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, Tyller Williamson Mayor of the City of Monterey, on behalf of the City Council and citizens, hereby congratulate Whalefest Monterey on the occasion of the 15th Anniversary of the two-day event.

Dated: April 1, 2025 _____________________
Tyller Williamson, Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 3, Packet Page 8 Council
Agenda Report
№10/24
FROM: Rafaela T. King, CPA, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Receive a Presentation on Pension Management Strategy and Long-Term Financial Plan (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive a presentation on Pension Management and Long Term Financial Strategic Plan
from CalMuni Advisors and the Weist Law Firm.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources
through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining
operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary
long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community
partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City Council is ultimately responsible for the City’s fiscal health, which continues to be a priority for the community.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There is no cost in receiving the presentation. Sufficient funds have been budgeted in FY 2024-25 to cover the
cost of Pension Plan and Policy, and Long-term Financial Plan from CalMuni Advisors and the Weist Law Firm. The
cost for the Pension Management Plan is $9,800 with
annual updates costing $1,950. The costs for the
Financial Planning Strategy is $20,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA
Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition,
CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council will receive a
presentation on Pension
Management and Long-Term
Financial Strategic Plan from
CalMuni Advisors and the Weist
Law Firm.
 The presentation aims to manage
and reduce pension costs and
create a ten-year financial plan for
debt management, capital
improvements, pension plans, and
reserve fund strategies.
 The City has established various
reserve funds, including a Pension
Reserve Fund, to address unfunded
pension liabilities and other postemployment benefits (OPEB) liabilities.
 The City’s total Pension and OPEB
Liability is $207,922,815 as of June
30, 2022.
 The Council has implemented a
Section 115 Trust with Public
Agency Retirement Services
(PARS) and adopted a reserve
policy to annually fund the pension
reserve account.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 2.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 1, Packet Page 9 №10/24
that CEQA applies only to activities that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council could choose not to receive the presentation.

DISCUSSION:

In line with the Value Driver of Financial Stewardship Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

The City Council received a comprehensive report and presentation from a consultant on the City’s pension obligations and options at the March 18, 2025 council meeting. At that time, the City Council was presented with repayment scenarios and estimated results of various options to repay the unfunded liability.

During the 2021-22 fiscal year, the Council voted to approve establishing a pension Reserve Fund to address the unfunded Pension Liabilities and Other Post Employment Benefit (OPEB) Liability. Each year, the city is required to pay contributions to the CalPERS retirement system.

The contribution amount to be remitted is an actuarial-based calculation provided by CalPERS annually. The contributions to fund the pension are comprised of two components, (1) the normal cost and (2) amortization of the Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL). The Normal cost is a percentage of the total active payroll. The percentage in recent years ranging from 10% to 13%. The UAL is the present value of future employer contributions for service already earned.

The contribution for the 24-25 fiscal year is $16,465,987 and is projected to be $17,400,000 for the FY 2025-26.

The Pension Liability for the Miscellaneous group is $324,486,573 reduced by the Net Position in the Fiduciary Plan of $215,093,541, leaving an unfunded balance of $109,393,032. The Pension Liability for the Safety group is $249,172,951, reduced by the Net Position in the Fiduciary Plan of $158,904,708, leaving an unfunded balance of $90,268,243 as of the last actuarial date of The Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Liability is $15,773,395 reduced by the Net Position in the Fiduciary Plan of $7,511,855, leaving an unfunded balance of $8,261,540 as of the June 2024 valuation date. The City’s total Pension and OPEB Liability is at $207,922,815 of the last actuarial date of June 30, 2022.

During the 2022-23 fiscal year, the Council voted to implement a Section 115 Trust with Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) with initial funding of $2M. Council also adopted a reserve policy for the Pension Reserve to annually fund the pension reserve account in the amount of $1M - $2.5M each year. Currently, the amount in the Section 115 Trust is $2.3M. The balance in the reserve account is $4M. As part of the pension reserve policy, staff is directed to come back to council to present the options of where to direct the funds allocated in the reserve account.

The various options include payments directly to CalPERS in the form of an additional direct Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 2, Packet Page 10 №10/24
payment (ADP), the Section 115 Trust with PARS for pension or the Section 115 Trust with CalPERS – CEBERT for OPEB.

During the 2022-23 and 2023-24 fiscal years, the Council voted to establish and annually fund various reserve funds including, increasing the percentage of contributed to the Economic Uncertainty Reserve to 20%, Technology reserve, Conference Center Facilities, Pension, City Facilities, Safety Building, Library Building, Sea Level Rise and Parking Facilities Reserve. Each reserve account has been funded at a modest level each year to begin the process of addressing the needs of the city including the $200M+ cost of infrastructure repairs and maintenance that has also been presented to the council and community.

During the Mid-Year Budget presentation in February 2025, council asked about a comprehensive plan for addressing the City’s finances as a whole. At that time, staff informed council of a plan to present at upcoming council meetings an update to the pension liability and a comprehensive financial sustainability plan to make sure the efforts that have been put in place for the reserve accounts have direction a total plan to provide visionary long-term planning and fiscal transparency.

Staff has engaged the professional services of CalMuni Advisors in conjunction with the Weist Law Group to (1) develop a pension management plan that effectively manages and reduces pension cost, thus allowing the city to strategically direct the funding set aside into the pension reserve account to the best vehicle to achieve the goals and (2) to create a ten-year financial plan covering debt management, capital improvements, pension plans, and reserve fund strategies to ensure long-term fiscal sustainability. Once plans are completed, they will come back and present to the Council.

RTK
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 3, Packet Page 11

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

CITY OF MONTEREY
Tuesday, March 18, 2025
4:00 PM 7:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER, 580 PACIFIC ST.

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Councilmembers

Present:

Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson (absent for Consent Agenda vote between 4:56 and 4:58 p.m.)

Absent: None
City Staff

Present:

City Manager, City Attorney, Finance Director, Community Development Director, Police Chief, Fire Chief, Parks and Recreation Director, Human Resources Director, Library & Museums Director, City Clerk, Property Manager, General Services Superintendent, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer, Planning Manager, Recreation Supervisor, Risk Manager, Recreation Manager, Acting Assistant Fire Chief, Engineering Assistant, Housing Manager, Assistant City Attorney, Management Analyst (City Manager's Office), Assistant Police Chief, Acting Harbormaster, Lead Mechanic, Engineering Projects Manager, Automotive Mechanic, Parking Maintenance Supervisor, Harbor Attendant
Call to Order
Mayor Williamson called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. City Clerk Klein called the roll with the Council present as indicated above.

AFTERNOON SESSION: 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.

Presentations

1. Recognize City Employees for Milestone Anniversaries and Retirements in 2025 (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Recognized employees
General Services Superintendent Dwight gave a verbal presentation honoring Automotive Mechanic Uribe, Lead Mechanic Huizar, and Parking Maintenance Supervisor Coleman.

Automotive Mechanic Uribe made brief comments. Public comment was not received. The Council praised the staff and retirees.

2. Receive a Presentation on the City's Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability/Pension Obligation Strategies (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Received presentation
Drew Ballard, actuary consultant of the firm Foster & Foster, gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from Nelson Vega, who urged the Council to use available funding and funding structures to pay down the unfunded pension liability.

The Council discussed the matter. It was requested to discuss the topic again and evaluate pension funding strategies during the annual budgeting process, and it was stressed that a Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 3.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 1, Packet Page 12 City Council Minutes March 18, 2025
2 strategy for more aggressively paying down pension liabilities should be a priority so as not to affect future generations. Concerns were raised about the risks of investing the pension side fund, because of security issues and potential losses, and further information was requested from City staff on fund management and safeguards in place. It was stressed that the Council would like to secure a 5% or greater return. It was stated that the Section 115 trust was a valuable tool for managing the City's CalPERS obligations moving forward.

General Public Comments
Public comment on non-agendized matters was received from Erica Walker.

Consent Agenda
Mayor Williamson said that the public had requested to pull Item 6 from the Consent Agenda. The Council commented on Item 5, stating that vessel insurance and other costs for older boats had increased dramatically, and asking that the Council and staff consider coming back to the Council in the future with more flexible provisions. It was requested to learn from the City Manager about what appeal process would be in place for anyone who couldn't make the September deadline, for instance if their boat were out for repair at the time of the deadline and they were still making regular payments.

Mayor Williamson left the Chamber at 4:56 p.m.

On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Rasch, and carried by the following vote, the City Council approved the Consent Agenda except Item 6:

AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Williamson
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Consent: Approval of Minutes

3. March 4, 2025 Regular Meeting (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Action: Approved (4-0-1, Mayor Williamson absent)
Consent: Ordinances

4. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending Monterey City Code Section 38-29 and Section 38-32 to Add Bicycle/Equipment Rental as a Principally Permitted Use in the Community Commercial (C-2) and Cannery Row (CR) Zoning Districts (Exempt from CEQA per Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183)
Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 3697 C.S. (4-0-1, Mayor Williamson absent)

5. Second Reading of an Ordinance to Amend Monterey City Code Chapter 17 Relating to Relocation of Vessels During City Sponsored Harbor Events, Requirements for Mooring Inspections and Repairs, and Requirements for Vessel Insurance (Exempt from CEQA, Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3) and Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 3698 C.S. (4-0-1, Mayor Williamson absent) Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 2, Packet Page 13 City Council Minutes March 18, 2025
3 Consent: Resolutions

6. Authorize Appropriating an Amount Not to Exceed $9,500 for Travel Expenses for Mayor Williamson and Councilmember Barber's Visit in June, 2025 to Sister City Isola delle Femmine, Sicily, Italy (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Action: Pulled from Consent; Tabled (4-1, Councilmember Smith voting no) Mayor Williamson returned to the Chamber at 4:58 p.m. just after the Consent Agenda vote. He gave a verbal presentation regarding the request for travel expenses, said he would like to table the request, and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Stating that the matter would return in the future for further discussion, Mayor Williamson limited the speaking time per person to 1 minute. Public comment was received from: Rick Aldinger, Nelson Vega, Carol Chorbajian, Nancy Selfridge, an unidentified woman, Carl Outzen, and Eloise Shim, who all spoke against the appropriation of public tax dollars on the Sister City visit; Bob Faulis, who asked for more clarity about the purpose of the Sister City program; Esther Malkin, who implied there was a staff conspiracy associated with bringing the matter forward at this particular time and said that the staff had neglected to develop an appropriate policy; and Kent Glenzer, who agreed with tabling the proposal, stating that that the matter was a policy issue.

It was expressed by the Council that there would not be future support for any expenditure for travel Sister City excursions.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following vote, the City Council tabled the item:

AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Williamson NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Smith
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

7. Approve a License Agreement with the Pecos League of Professional Baseball Clubs for Use of Frank E. Sollecito, Jr. Ballpark for Dates in May through August 2025 with Conditions (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 25-016 C.S. (4-0-1, Mayor Williamson absent)

8. Approve a Five-Year Allocation of Funds from the Sewer Line Maintenance Fund, and Authorize a Memorandum of Agreement with Monterey One Water (M1W) to Provide Inspection Services Related to the Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program and Stormwater Management Program (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 25-017 C.S. (4-0-1, Mayor Williamson absent)

9. Adopt a Resolution Accepting the 2024 General Plan Annual Report (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 25-018 C.S. (4-0-1, Mayor Williamson absent) Consent: Other

10. Authorize Settlement of the City's Claim Against Pacific Gas and Electric Company for $47,541.35 related to Power Outages on September 22, 2024, and September 24, 2024 (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Authorized settlement (4-0-1, Mayor Williamson absent) Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 3, Packet Page 14 City Council Minutes March 18, 2025
4 11. Authorize the Mayor to Sign Additional Letters on Behalf of the City Supporting the Application by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County to the Senate Bill 1 Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP) and Local Partnership Program for the SR 156 – Castroville Blvd Interchange Project (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Authorized Mayor to sign letters (4-0-1, Mayor Williamson absent) End of Consent Agenda
The Council adjourned from the Council meeting to the Ocean View Community Services District meeting.

Ocean View Community Services District Meeting: Consent Agenda

12. Receive Ocean View Community Services District Quarterly Report (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Received report
City Attorney Davi said there were no updates beyond what was written in the agenda report.

Public comment was received from Bob Faulis, who gave an update regarding the status of legal proceedings and plans for future development with regard to the Ocean View Plaza Project, and asked the Council to consider sending a staff member to the July 2025 Coastal Commission meeting to support the project.

The Board of Directors of the Ocean View Community Services District adjourned to the City Council meeting.

Public Appearance

13. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 23, Sections 1, 2, and 9, Repealing Section 23-3 Subsections (a)-(c) and Section 20-85, and Adding Chapter 32, Section 5 Relating To Camping In Recreation Areas and On Other Public Property, and In Vehicles (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 3699 C.S.

Assistant City Attorney Salameh gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from: Katrina Hintze, who said that an area was missing on the map between Ramona Avenue and Roberts Avenue up to Del Monte Boulevard and asked to keep the Naval Postgraduate School on the map; Bob Faulis, who said he wanted to be sure the public's access to the beach was not affected; Erica Walker, who expressed concern about the 30 day period indicated in the ordinance under "Necessity of Warning Prior to Citation"; Lorna Moffat, who expressed concern about a lack of compassion being shown to homeless people; and Eloise Shim, who spoke against public camping, citing health issues.

On question from the Council, Assistant City Attorney Salameh provided clarity on the 30 day period indicated in the ordinance under "Necessity of Warning Prior to Citation." Police Chief Hober addressed questions about how the City and its police officers interact with local jurisdictions. Community Development Director Cole provided context about the zoning for the area identified by Ms. Hintze. Assistant City Attorney Salameh clarified that this ordinance was not Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 4, Packet Page 15 City Council Minutes March 18, 2025
5 tied to "open space" zoning but included the Recreational Trail and other property owned by the City that was maintained for active or passive recreational purposes.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3699 C.S.:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Adjourn to Closed Session
Public comment was not received on the closed session items. The Council adjourned to closed session at 6:03 p.m.

Closed Session

14. Closed Session Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: 285 Figueroa Street (Monterey Beach Station)
Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete
Negotiating Parties: Cheryl Cox and Debbie Young (Cox & Young Ventures, LLC) (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Lease Amendment (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) -- continued from March 4, 2025
Action: On a unanimous roll call vote, confidential direction was given to property negotiators

15. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1): Richard Rosendale v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV000879) (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: On a unanimous roll call vote, confidential direction was given to legal counsel
The Council recessed at 6:43 p.m. and reconvened at 7:02 p.m.

EVENING SESSION AGENDA: 7:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.

Councilmember Rasch led the Pledge of Allegiance.

Announcements from Closed Session
City Attorney Davi reported out from the closed session as indicated in the actions recorded for closed session items 14 and 15, above.

General Public Comments, Continued
Public comment on non-agendized matters was received from Nelson Vega, an unidentified woman, Nina Beety, and Lorna Moffat.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 5, Packet Page 16 City Council Minutes March 18, 2025
6 Evening Session Items
Public Appearance (Evening)

16. First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 8, Sections 2.02 and 2.03 Relating to the Rental Inventory Program Exempt Properties Reporting and Fee Pass-Through (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Passed Ordinance to a second reading (3-2, Councilmembers Rasch and Smith voting no)
Management Analyst Ackermann gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from: Hans Jannasch, who suggested the creation of a commission or other arbitration system, in which tenants and landlords could come together to discuss issues, and in which participation would preclude eviction; Nelson Vega, who spoke against the removal of the 50% fee pass-through to tenants, citing difficulties faced by landlords; an unidentified man, Adam Pinterits, an unidentified woman, and Lori Mazzuca, who all spoke against the continuation of the Rental Inventory Program; Nancy Soulé, who asked that a landlord be able to report a vacancy at the time a unit is advertised for rent instead of within 30 days; Erica Walker, who expressed concern about email being required for participation in the registry; an unidentified woman, who said the program should be ended, or all data including those of "mom and pop" landlords (who she said should participate for free) should be collected and analyzed and then the program ended; Esther Malkin, who said one year had not been enough time to gain the insight needed; Monica Lal, who cautioned that excessive regulation might deter property owners from renting out units; and Tom Reeves, who asked for an exemption for family-to-family rentals.

During public comments, Councilmember Smith left the Chamber from 7:44 p.m. to 7:46 p.m.

The Council took up the matter. On question from the Council, Management Analyst Ackermann and City Manager Uslar said that exemption of family-to-family rentals would be onerous to determine and to enforce. Management Analyst Ackermann clarified how City staff would handle a registration by a landlord who wished to take some time between rentals to fix up the property or have it off the market, stating that landlords were required to report vacancies but were not required to immediately re-register unless or until they re-entered the rental market. He clarified that vacant units were defined as any units that were not currently occupied.

Regarding the pass-through fee from landlord to tenant, it was argued that it unfairly burdened landlords and that it would impact tenants regardless because landlords would always pass costs on to tenants. On the other hand it was noted that the fee expense would be fair if applied fully to landlords because it was a tax write-off for landlords and not for tenants.

Regarding the exemption for owners of three or fewer rental units, it was stated that removing it and requiring registration from these "mom and pop" owners would be appropriate, noting that when the exemption was first considered it had been assumed that there were fewer “mom and pop” owners and now data showed that the numbers of these owners were more significant. It was stressed that the Council was trying to capture as much information as possible to assist in crafting policy that would benefit all. On the other hand, comments were made suggesting that the "mom and pop" exemption be retained, stating that these property owners appeared to be protecting the City from corporate ownership of rental properties.

Comments against staff's recommendation were made, disagreeing with the concept of the Rental Inventory as a whole, calling it overreach, and stating that data had been gathered and it now was time to decommission the program and focus on other ways to protect tenants, such as by providing rental assistance, addressing issues of slum landlords, and rehabilitating units.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 6, Packet Page 17 City Council Minutes March 18, 2025
7 Comments in support of staff's recommendation were made, stating that the registry was succeeding in its intention to provide valuable data that the City didn't already have. It was stated that the program ensured transparency and was supposed to create a fair and equitable marketplace, help residents, and improve systems.

A motion was introduced by Councilmember Garcia, and seconded by Councilmember Barber, to pass the draft Ordinance to a second reading.

A friendly amendment to the motion was introduced by the motion seconder to keep the 50% fee pass-through but implement a 12-month payment period for the renter's portion of the fee. The mover did not support the suggested amendment, stating that part of the purpose of the program was to support tenants and noting that property owners could write the fee off as a cost of doing business. The motion seconder withdrew her friendly amendment.

A substitute motion was introduced by Councilmember Smith, and seconded by Councilmember Rasch, to decommission the program entirely. and carried by the following vote The Council briefly discussed the need for landlord privacy. On the one hand, it was requested that owners' names and addresses not be linked with the amount of rent that they charged. On the other hand, it was stated that the program had been established in such a way that a lot of information was already kept private.

The substitute motion failed by the following vote:

AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Rasch, Smith
NOES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Williamson
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
The Council briefly further discussed concerns regarding the fee pass-through, i.e. whether it unduly burdened landlords, and whether it would burden tenants who were meant to be protected.

The initial motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Williamson
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Rasch, Smith
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
The Council recessed at 8:47 p.m. and reconvened at 9:03 p.m.

17. Approve a Public Engagement Approach for Lower Presidio (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Approved the proposed public engagement approach Library & Museums Director Edwards gave the staff presentation, which outlined the recommended approach to public engagement on the future of the Lower Presidio: 1) Conduct initial engagement (community survey, Have Your Say Monterey public engagement project page, and community workshops) with residents and the community at large; 2) Engage with and deliver presentations to Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC), Historic Preservation Commission (HPC), and Museums and Cultural Arts Commission (MCAC) and gather feedback from one designated liaison from each of the bodies who would also participate in future community Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 7, Packet Page 18 City Council Minutes March 18, 2025
8 charrettes and workshops; and 3) Conduct a community charrette and workshop about the future of Lower Presidio Historic Park, with participation by the designated liaison from each of the three commissions. He answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from: Bill Wojtkowski of the Old Monterey Foundation, who said that the Lower Presidio should remain open to the public, said the foundation would assist with outreach, suggested a joint meeting of relevant commissions, and called for continued study of slope erosion issues; Tom Reeves, who said that Base Realignment and Closure ("BRAC") discussions were very relevant, urged the City to remove the sidewalk from the Lighthouse Curve which he said was dangerous, and questioned the concept of a fair market value for a historic park and Native American heritage site; and Alan Haffa, who said that the site was historic and important and should not be surrendered, noting that many Monterey residents donated to its restoration, and suggested that the CIty work with the Undersecretary of the Army.

The Council discussed the matter and agreed on the importance of preserving the site’s historical and cultural significance. It was stated that the site had room for improvement of traffic flow and layout. The proposed public engagement process was supported and it was stressed that neighborhood associations needed to be included in discussions. It was noted that there had been discussions about how to involve Federal representatives. Mr. Wojtkowski's suggestion of a joint commission meeting was discussed and supported, though it was noted that there could be logistical challenges relating to meeting on-site at the Presidio. It was urged that the City seek federal and nonprofit partnerships to fund preservation of the property, with particular interest in the potential for designation as a National Historic site, which was stated to be possibly the most secure way to maintain and preserve the public space.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, and carried by the following vote, the City Council approved the public engagement approach for the Lower Presidio:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

18. Approving a Pathway for Undergrounding Implementation (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Approved moving forward with a contracted consultant to do the work needed to execute the North Fremont Rule 20A undergrounding project (4-1, Councilmember Smith voting no)
City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director Easterling gave the staff presentation outlining options available to the Council for selection as a pathway for utility undergrounding implementation, including: hiring a full-time Senior Project Manager to oversee the project; developing a Master Plan; and forming a Technical Advisory Committee appointed by the Mayor/City Manager consisting of subject matter experts including City staff.

Public comment was received from: Ray Meyers and Suzanne Grimes of the independent neighborhood committee Monterey Undergrounding, who urged that the City hire a dedicated undergrounding project manager; Charlie Chell, who spoke in favor of establishing a master plan to guide project prioritization and secure funding opportunities; Hans Jannasch, who said that there was a lot of public support in Monterey for utility undergrounding, which he said was related to wildfire prevention; Nancy Soulé, who echoed the call for hiring a project manager and said that evacuation routes should be undergrounded first; Eric Palmer, who expressed concern about hiring a full-time employee and staffing a new committee without guaranteed funding and documented support from property owners; an unidentified man who said he was a retired first Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 8, Packet Page 19 City Council Minutes March 18, 2025
9 responder and supported the formation of a technical advisory committee and development of a master plan; Tom Reeves, who expressed concern about relying on Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program ("NCIP") funds that he said may not always be appropriate to be used for undergrounding, and suggested dedicating a portion of Transient Occupancy Tax ("TOT") funds instead to fund paying for a dedicated staff member; Esther Malkin, who echoed interest in protecting evacuation routes but also highlighted other infrastructure needs that she said City residents may prioritize; and Kim Cutino, who stressed the needs both to be thoughtful and flexible in where to place utility lines underground, and to ensure that water was available to put out fires when needed.

The Council took up the matter for discussion.

Regarding whether to hire staff or secure a consultant to do undergrounding project management, concern was raised about whether there was sufficient ongoing revenue to justify hiring dedicated staff. It was requested to learn more about how the City would fund a staff member once NCIP funds were no longer used for their salary. On the one hand, it was argued that a full-time project manager would provide continuity and accountability, and concerns were expressed that a consultant might lack beneficial existing ties to the City and could be replaced mid-project, which would be disruptive. On the other hand, concerns were expressed about budget constraints associated with hiring a full-time staff member, it was questioned whether the role could be absorbed into existing staffing if long-term funding became uncertain, and hesitation was shared regarding burdening the general fund without certainty about the future. It was stated that any staffing of a new position should be brought to the Council in a few months during the budget process. On question from the Council, City Manager Uslar provided insight about logistics of hiring consultants.

Regarding a master plan, it was stated that a comprehensive master plan was needed, with arguments that a well-defined strategy would clarify priorities and improve access to funding. On the other hand, concern was expressed that excessive planning could delay implementation, and an incremental approach was urged instead.

It was stated that community engagement and public buy-in would be of extreme importance, and stressed that property owners and businesses would need to be well-informed about the costs and benefits of undergrounding utilities. It was suggested that the City conduct a community undergrounding survey to gauge sentiment and gather data to inform future decisions.

Regarding funding mechanisms, historical context was provided for Pacific Gas and Electric ("PG&E") Rule 20A funds, and it was stressed that the City should take advantage of its allocated $4.7 million in Rule 20A funds before their expiration and redistribution in 2031. The potential for a benefit assessment district was discussed, and it was stated that there could be significant pushback from property owners who could not afford their part of the cost. Concerns were expressed about potential conflicts among neighbors if assessment districts were to be implemented, stating that some residents might feel they were unfairly burdened.

The prioritization of North Fremont Boulevard as a pilot area was discussed, and it was stated that such prioritization would be justified due to PG&E’s designation of the area as under-serviced, making it eligible for the remaining Rule 20A funding. On the one hand, it was questioned whether other high-priority areas, such as neighborhoods with higher wildfire risk, or evacuation routes, should be prioritized. On the other hand, it was argued that focusing on North Fremont as a pilot project made sense and would serve as a replicable model for future undergrounding efforts.

It was noted that the City would learn from using North Fremont as a pilot corridor, such as what stakeholders would be impacted, how to coordinate with businesses about disruptions, and how to handle utility connections to structures that were receded far back from the street.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 9, Packet Page 20 City Council Minutes March 18, 2025
10 Regarding forming a technical advisory committee, support was expressed for involving experts, engineers, and community representatives in an advisory capacity, who would ensure appropriate and knowledgeable oversight of undergrounding projects. However, it was also stated that the focus and priority should be on the North Fremont project and that a committee should not be started before there was an actual need for it.

Ultimately, after extensive discussion, support was expressed for beginning utility undergrounding incrementally, starting with using existing PG&E Rule 20A funds before committing to further obligations.

A motion was introduced by Councilmember Smith, and seconded by Councilmember Rasch, to direct the City Manager to proceed with hiring a project manager staff member to implement the pathway for undergrounding implementation.

On a substitute motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following vote, the Council directed City staff to move forward with hiring a contract consultant to do the work needed to execute the North Fremont Rule 20A undergrounding project:

AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Williamson NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Smith
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
RECUSED: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Council Comments
Councilmember Smith conveyed thanks to Library and Museums Director Edwards for speaking to the Cannery Row Rotary Club a few weeks prior. He said there would be a significant vote upcoming at the California Transportation Commission which if approved would fund and approve a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) designation for the Monterey-Salinas Transit SURF! Busway project. Regarding the topic of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC), he said that that at the end of March he would be traveling with the City Manager to Virginia to attend the Association of Defense Communities summit.

City Manager Reports – None made.

Adjournment
The Council adjourned at 11:39 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Clementine Bonner Klein Tyller Williamson
City Clerk Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 10, Packet Page 21 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Andrea Renny, PE, PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Cody Hennings, Engineering Assistant II
SUBJECT: Awarding a Construction Contract in the Amount of $2,034,807.22 to McKim Corporation for the Citywide Road Surface Repair Project 24/25 (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1)***Measure S*** RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Approving the plans and specifications for the
Citywide Road Surface Repair Project 24/25
(35C1553) (“Project”) which are available in the
office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and granting
the Public Works Director, or their designee, the
authority to approve all amendments and addenda
thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Accepting all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awarding a Construction Contract for the Total Bid
to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, McKim
Corporation, in the amount of $2,034,807.22;

4. Authorizing the City Manager, or their designee, to
execute the contract upon the receipt of the
information required by the Project plans and
specifications, and;

5. Authorizing staff to expend up to an additional 15%
for unforeseen construction contingencies for timely
completion of the Project.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion; championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term
planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is considering
awarding a construction contract to
McKim Corporation for the Citywide
Road Surface Repair Project 24/25,
with a total bid amount of
$2,034,807.22
 The project involves repairing and
maintaining various streets
throughout the City, including
pavement spot repairs, crack
sealing, and seal coat application on
several streets throughout the City.
 The project is funded by Measure S,
a 1% sales tax dedicated to fixing
streets, sidewalks, and storm drain
systems, which has significantly
improved the City's pavement
condition index from 54 to 81.
 Construction is expected to begin in
late spring 2025 and will last for 75
working days, with lane and parking
closures anticipated.
 The City has sufficient funding
available for the project, with a
balance of $6,946,332.46 in the
project account as of February 28,
2025.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 4.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 1, Packet Page 22 №10/24
Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with the City Council’s Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities of Fiscal Stewardship – “Prioritize funding models and sources for facility rehabilitation, repair, and replacement” and Active Mobility – “Maintain and repair core street, roadway, and storm drain infrastructure.” This action is in accordance with Chapter 28-Purchasing of the City Code, which requires Public Works project contract awards exceeding $150,000 to be approved by City Council.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

On February 25, 2025, six (6) bids were received, and opened by the Finance Director’s Designee as follows:

Bidder Total Bid
McKim Corporation $2,034,807.22
A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba Teichert Construction $2,180,824.00 Coastal Paving & Excavating Inc. $2,297,297.00
Granite Rock Company $2,432,298.62
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $2,503,016.03
The Don Chapin Company $2,702,859.98
Basis of award for this project is based on the Total Bid.

Engineer’s Estimate:

Estimated Construction Cost:
$2,899,300.00
Total Bid $2,034,807.22
Construction Contingency (15%) $305,221.00
Total Construction Cost (This Authorization) $2,340,028.22 Construction Management (City Staff & Indirect Cost) $155,000.00 Total Estimated Cost to Complete the Project $2,495,028.22 Available Funding Sources:
35C1553 $6,946,332.46
This Project has an available funding balance of $6,946,332.46 as of February 28, 2025.

Therefore, funding is available in the project account for the construction of the Total Bid.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 2, Packet Page 23 №10/24
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of, but is not limited to, pavement spot repair of approximately 110,000 square feet, crack sealing, placing of approximately 95,600 square yards of seal coat, associated striping removal and replacement, and refreshing of existing painted street markings. All work is within the public-right-of-way. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a - Location - does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project does not involve the creation of additional automobile lanes.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements' limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project would not impact historic resources as project improvements would only occur in the public right-of-way. The project is located in a sensitive archeological area as shown on the General Plan EIR Figure 8; however, no digging will occur in native soil. Therefore, there would be no impacts to historic or archeological resources.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to award the construction contract for this Project; however, the proposed project implements maintenance activities that are required to repair and maintain existing infrastructure.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 3, Packet Page 24 №10/24
DISCUSSION:

Project Overview
The Citywide Road Surface Repair Project 24/25 consists of the removal and replacement of deteriorated and damaged asphalt concrete (AC), the application of crack sealant, and the placement of slurry to existing streets throughout the City. The street segments included in this project are David Avenue, Devisadero Street, Filmore Street, Irving Avenue, Laine Street, Lyndon Street, Terry Street, Taylor Street, Forest Ridge Road, Ocean Avenue, Aguajito Road, Allan Drive, Helvic Alley, Helvic Avenue, Palo Verde Avenue, Portola Alley, Garden Road, Casanova Avenue, Euclid Avenue, and Ramona Avenue. The work is expected to begin in late spring 2025, pending an executed agreement, and the project has a contract duration of 75 working days. The specific dates of construction will be announced to the public in advance, with information posted on the City of Monterey’s Construction News webpage at monterey.gov/construction. The contractor will also be distributing outreach notices to impacted areas prior to construction. Construction is anticipated to include lane and parking closures; minor traffic impacts are anticipated.

The project plans and specifications were developed by consultants with quality checks by City staff and advertised for construction bids and are available for public review in the Office of the City Engineer (580 Pacific St., Room 7).

On February 25, 2025, the City received six (6) bids. The lowest responsive total base bid was submitted by McKim Corporation, from Gilroy, CA in the amount of $2,034,807.22, which was below the Engineer’s Estimate of $2,899,300. Due to the available funding, Staff recommends award of the total base bid in the amount of $2,034,807.22. McKim Corporation has recently completed work in the City of Monterey, including Citywide Road Surface Repair Project, Phase

5. Staff is confident with the ability of the contractor to successfully perform the work described in this project.

This project is funded with Measure P/S funds. Measure P/S is a 1% sales tax approved by voters in 2014 and continued in 2018 for fixing streets, sidewalks and storm drain systems.

Since its adoption, the tax has been effective in improving the City’s accessibility. Measure P/S funds are a dedicated and reliable resource for fixing and maintaining the City’s streets, curb ramps, sidewalks, and storm drains. Over the past decade, Measure P/S funds have been used to maintain City streets, sidewalks, and storm drains and upgrade ADA ramps. Prior to the adoption of Measure P in 2015, the City’s overall pavement condition index ("PCI”) was rated 54 out of 100, which categorized Monterey’s street system as “At Risk,” only five points away from a “Poor” rating. Since its adoption, the City's Pavement Condition Index has improved from 54 to 81. Without this resource, the City would not be able to maintain its streets to the same level of service.

AR/ch
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Bid Evaluation Tab
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 4, Packet Page 25 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,034,807.22 TO MCKIM CORPORATION FOR THE CITYWIDE ROAD SURFACE REPAIR PROJECT 24/25 WHEREAS, on the 25th day of February 2025, at 2:00 p.m. the City of Monterey Finance Director’s designee received Six (6) electronic bids through the City’s e-Procurement Portal, OpenGov Procurement, for the Citywide Road Surface Repair Project 24/25 (35C1553) (“Project”);
WHEREAS, McKim Corporation, A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba Teichert Construction, Coastal Paving & Excavating Inc., Granite Rock Company, DRYCO Construction, Inc., The Don Chapin Company submitted responsive, responsible bids for the Project; WHEREAS, the basis of award for the project was the Total Base Bid; WHEREAS, McKim Corporation submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid in the amount of $2,034,807.22;
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in account 35C1553 to complete the project; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of, but is not limited to, pavement spot repair of approximately 110,000 square feet, crack sealing, placing of approximately 95,600 square yards of seal coat, associated striping removal and replacement, and refreshing of existing painted street markings.

All work is within the public-right-of-way. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 5, Packet Page 26 Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Approves the plans and specifications for the Citywide Road Surface Repair Project 24/25 (35C1553) (“Project”) which are available in the office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and granting the Public Works Director, or their designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Accepts all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awards a Construction Contract for the Total Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, McKim Corporation, in the amount of $2,034,807.22;

4. Authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of the information required by the Project plans and specifications;

5. Authorizes staff to expend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen construction contingencies for timely completion of the Project; and

6. Authorizes the Finance Director, or their designee, to modify contract funding sources within the approved not-to-exceed amount of the contract, including contingency.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 6, Packet Page 27 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 7, Packet Page 28 City of Monterey
Finance Department
Rafaela King, Finance Director
580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940

EVALUATION TABULATION
General Solicitation - CITYWIDE ROAD SURFACE REPAIR PROJECT 24/25 (35C1553)

Page 1 ends

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
CITYWIDE ROAD SURFACE REPAIR PROJECT 24/25 (35C1553)
RESPONSE DEADLINE: February 25, 2025 at 2:00 pm
Tuesday, February 25, 2025

SELECTED VENDOR TOTALS
Vendor Total
McKim Corporation $2,034,807.22
A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba
Teichert Construction
$2,180,824.00
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$2,297,297.00
Granite Rock Company $2,432,298.62
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $2,503,016.03
The Don Chapin Company $2,702,859.98

SCHEDULE A
Vendor Total
McKim Corporation $816,193.32
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $892,973.40
A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba
Teichert Construction
$893,186.70
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$945,337.16
Granite Rock Company $993,483.32
The Don Chapin Company $1,089,699.98

SCHEDULE B
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 8, Packet Page 29

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
CITYWIDE ROAD SURFACE REPAIR PROJECT 24/25 (35C1553)

Page 2 ends

Vendor Total
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $154,478.50
McKim Corporation $164,870.50
A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba
Teichert Construction
$180,110.50
Granite Rock Company $196,483.00
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$242,134.00
The Don Chapin Company $266,470.00

SCHEDULE C
Vendor Total
McKim Corporation $303,463.00
A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba
Teichert Construction
$329,973.00
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$334,324.00
Granite Rock Company $384,618.00
The Don Chapin Company $395,995.00
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $434,497.00

SCHEDULE D
Vendor Total
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$125,800.40
The Don Chapin Company $131,382.00
McKim Corporation $131,580.80
A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba
Teichert Construction
$142,135.80
Granite Rock Company $154,910.80
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $174,474.00

SCHEDULE E
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 9, Packet Page 30

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
CITYWIDE ROAD SURFACE REPAIR PROJECT 24/25 (35C1553)

Page 3 ends

Vendor Total
McKim Corporation $266,092.00
A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba
Teichert Construction
$271,141.00
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$291,258.00
Granite Rock Company $296,916.00
The Don Chapin Company $348,008.00
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $362,973.03

SCHEDULE F
Vendor Total
McKim Corporation $352,607.60
Coastal Paving &
Excavating Inc.
$358,443.44
A. Teichert & Son, Inc. dba
Teichert Construction
$364,277.00
Granite Rock Company $405,887.50
The Don Chapin Company $471,305.00
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $483,620.10
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 10, Packet Page 31 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/24
AMENDING CHAPTER 8, SECTIONS 2.02 AND 2.03 RELATING TO THE RENTAL INVENTORY PROGRAM’S EXEMPT PROPERTIES REPORTING AND FEE-PASS

THROUGH PROVISIONS
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City of Monterey ("City") has broad authority to maintain the public peace, health and safety of its community and preserve the quality of life for its residents and may make and enforce all regulations and ordinances using its police powers to do so; WHEREAS, according to the Monterey County Analysis of Impediments of Fair Housing Choice, published in 2019, 65.9 percent of housing units in the City are occupied by renters, who are an essential part of the City’s community and workforce; WHEREAS, beginning January 1, 2024 the City required owners of residential rental properties to provide the City with information annually regarding the character and other information regarding Rental Units, including optional information that could include the rent level of the Rental Units;
WHEREAS, in the rental registry’s first year the overall compliance rate was 73% with 1,725 units having been exempted, which means that the data collected currently only provides a picture for roughly 51.6% of the residential rental market; WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines the Rental Inventory Ordinance, codified in Chapter 8 of the City Code, is amended pursuant to the City’s police power to protect to the public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, approval of this ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the general rule in California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

The activity is covered by the general rule which exempts activities that can be seen with certainty to have no possibility for causing a significant effect on the environment.

NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

SECTION 2: The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as fully set forth herein.

SECTION 3: Monterey City Code, Chapter 8, Subsection (A) of Section 2.02 is hereby amended as follows:
“A. Initial Registration. A landlord must register every rental unit that is subject to the provisions of this Article within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the ordinance codified in this Article. All exemptions to the registration requirements of this Article shall expire on June Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 5.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 5., Item Page 1, Packet Page 32 30, 2025, and landlords shall register every rental unit by July 1, 2025. Landlords shall complete the registration on forms provided by the City. The forms provided by the City may include a secure internet website with an interface for submitting the information required by this Article. Registration is complete only when all required information has been provided to the City and all outstanding fees and penalties, if applicable, have been paid. The City may issue an administrative citation and impose a late penalty should a landlord fail to register their rental unit(s) in compliance with this Article.”
SECTION 4: Monterey City Code, Chapter 8, Subsection (D) of Section 2.02 is hereby deleted and the remaining subsections shall be re-ordered alphabetically.

SECTION 5: Monterey City Code, Chapter 8, Subsections (C) and (D) of Section 2.03 are hereby amended as follows:
“C. Rental Inventory Fees Pass-Through. A Landlord may not recover any portion of the Rental Inventory Fee, including any associated late penalties, from their Tenant(s).

D. Exemptions. This section shall not apply to the following Rental Units:

1. Subsidized Rental Units. Rental Units in the housing developments are restricted by deed, regulatory restriction contained in an agreement with a government agency, or other recorded document as affordable to persons and families or very low, low, or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, or subject to an agreement that provides housing subsidies for affordable housing for persons and families of very low, low, or moderate income as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code or comparable federal statutes.

2. Mobile Home Spaces. A lot or space of land in a Mobile Home Park where a Mobile Home is or may be located. Mobile Home and Mobile Home Park shall have the same meaning as the definitions of "mobilehome" defined in Section 798.3 of the Civil Code and "mobile home park" defined in Section 798.4 of the Civil Code, respectively, as those sections may be amended from time to time, or their successor code sections.

3. Accessory Dwelling Units. Legal accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units, and second dwelling units, if the primary dwelling is owneroccupied. If the primary dwelling is presently or has previously been held out for rental, then both units are subject to this Section 8-2.03.

4. Owner-Occupied Residences. Any residential dwelling unit where the Owner of Record occupies the dwelling unit as their Principal Residence, rents out one (1) or more bedrooms in the dwelling unit, and regularly shares in the use of kitchen or bath facilities with the tenants.

5. Small Property Owner Exemption. Any Rental Unit of an Owner who owns and manages three (3) or fewer Rental Units within the boundaries of the City.

6. Termination of Exemption. When a Rental Unit that was exempt from this section no longer qualifies for the exemption, the Landlord must re-register the Rental Unit with the City within thirty (30) days after the exemption has ended and pay the applicable fee.”
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 5., Item Page 2, Packet Page 33 SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Article is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter.

SECTION 7: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 8: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 5., Item Page 3, Packet Page 34 Council
Agenda Report
№10/24
FROM: Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Reginald Paulding, P.E., Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: Authorize the Finance Director to Appropriate $800,000 from the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Ending Balance Account to Previously Approved NCIP Forest Management and Fuel Reduction Project ***NCIP*** (Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on October 25, 2022) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached Resolution
authorizing the Finance Director, or their designee, to appropriate $800,000 from the NCIP Ending Balance
account (31nunap) to the Forest Management and Fuel
Reduction Project account (ncp2501).

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources
through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining
operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary
long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community
partnerships.

Foster a local government that is transparent and
collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates
input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The determination of the projects, priorities and
expenditures shall be within the sound discretion of the City Council. (City Charter Section 6.6(e).)
The recommended actions are consistent with Council
policy to approve all budget amendments and with
established policy and procedures for amending NCIP
project budgets. (NCIP Policies and Procedures Manual,
September 7, 2021).

Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is considering a
resolution to allocate $800,000 from
the Neighborhood and Community
Improvement Program (NCIP)
Ending Balance to the Forest
Management and Fuel Reduction
Project
 The project aims to reduce wildfire
risk and manage the city's greenbelt
system, addressing dead and dying
trees, vegetation, and downed
material.
 The NCIP Committee voted
unanimously to recommend this
additional funding due to the
importance of ongoing forest
management and fuel reduction
efforts.
 The project has received high
community support, with 147 out of
150 votes in favor during the NCIP
Committee's project selection for FY
2024/25.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 6.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 1, Packet Page 35 №10/24
On June 6, 2024, the NCIP Committee voted on proposed projects for the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program. The Community-Wide Forest Management & Fuel Reduction Project received 147 votes out of a possible maximum total of 150 votes, making it the highest ranked project for FY 2024/25. Pursuant to City Code section 2-

4.01(c), on August 13, 2024, the Planning Commission determined this project to be consistent with the General Plan.

Funding the Community-Wide Forest Management & Fuel Reduction Project is consistent with City Policy and has been done regularly in prior years as part of the general NCIP Project adoption and funding process. The project has been identified for additional funding outside of the newly adopted NCIP schedule for FY2025/26 to bridge any gaps in funding Fuel Reduction efforts. This additional funding will allow the Forestry Division and Fire Department to continue to meet the existing need in the greenbelts and to continue working in the field uninterrupted.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

As of March 10, 2025, the NCIP Ending Balance is $1,371,074. Supplemental appropriations totaling $800,000.00 from the NCIP Ending Balance to the project account will allow the project to move forward. If approved by Council, following the completion of the requested appropriations, the NCIP Ending Balance (31nunap) will have a remaining balance of $571,074.00. There is sufficient funding available for this recommended action.

Project Funding as of March 10, 2025:

Forest Management and Fuel Reduction (ncp2501) Available Balance
$407,163
Requested Supplemental Appropriation of Ending Balance $800,000 Total Project Available Balance $1,207,163
The NCIP Committee recommended City Council appropriate an additional $800,000 to Forest Management and Fuel Reduction Project at the NCIP Committee Meeting on February 19, 2025.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

On October 25, 2022, a Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project (SCH#2022080742) was approved by the Planning Commission (Resolution No. P22-024), superseding the originally approved IS-MND for the project that approved by the Planning Commission on December 8, 2020 (Resolution No. P20-028). A Notice of Determination was filed according to CEQA requirements following Planning Commission’s adoption of the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project IS-MND.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could choose not to approve the requested additional appropriation for this previously approved NCIP project; however, this is not recommended. If this request is not approved, there would be a gap in funding for fuel reduction which is a critical project that reduces the risk of wildfires across the City. The Council may also choose to fund the project for a higher or lesser amount than the $800,000 recommended by the NCIP Committee.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 2, Packet Page 36 №10/24
DISCUSSION:

The Forest Management and Fuel Reduction project was approved by City Council on August 20, 2024 as part of the FY 2024/2025 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program and was funded for $1,000,000 (Resolution No. 24-132).

As of March 24, 2025, the current available balance for the Forest Management and Fuel Reduction project is $352,558 with $70,026 unencumbered in purchase orders for planned work. With the NCIP Committee-adopted schedule change for the FY 2025/26 project review cycle, this remaining funding will not be sufficient to continue the work of forest management and fuel reduction for the remainder of this NCIP cycle. The new NCIP Committee-approved schedule has a project application due date of July 31, 2025, instead of early February as in prior years with the revised voting night schedule for the week before Thanksgiving (November 19, 2025) and scheduled presentation to City Council during the first meeting in April 2026.

In 2024, the Forestry Division addressed 338 acres in the City’s greenbelt system as part of annual scheduled maintenance (e.g., weed-eating seasonal grasses), not including the dozen of miscellaneous City-owned properties, and 254 acres of more intense fuel reduction work as part of the City’s CAL FIRE grant project.

NCIP funds also allowed the Forestry Division to quickly address dead and dying trees which are difficult to anticipate. These funds also allow the Forestry Division to address vegetation and downed material that has been greater than normal due to the above average rainfall and storm events in the past two years. Aside from the fuel mitigation, these funds also allowed the Forestry Division to replant over 150 trees to help maintain the urban forest canopy.

On February 19, 2025, the NCIP Committee had a robust discussion about the importance of forest management and fuel reduction within the City and the rationale for supporting a significant additional appropriation continuing the existing project due to the change in the NCIP calendar for FY 2025/26. Following public comment and the committee discussion, the NCIP committee unanimously approved a recommendation for appropriation of an additional $800,000 in funding for the Forest Management and Fuel Reduction Project (ncp2501).

AR/rp
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Chinyere Ogbonna, NCIP Committee Chair
Dennis Duke, NCIP Committee Vice Chair
Rafaela King, Finance Director
Wendy Davies, Finance Manager
Karen Larson, Parks and Recreation Director
Thys Norton, Assistant Urban Forester
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 3, Packet Page 37 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO APPROPRIATE $800,000 FROM THE

NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (NCIP) ENDING

BALANCE ACCOUNT TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED NCIP FOREST MANAGEMENT AND FUEL REDUCTION PROJECT ***NCIP***
WHEREAS, the Forest Management and Fuel Reduction (ncp2501) project was recommended to City Council by the NCIP Committee as part of the FY 2024/2025 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program;
WHEREAS, City Council appropriated $1,000,000 for the Forest Management and Fuel Reduction project on August 20, 2024;
WHEREAS, the Neighborhood Community Improvement Program Committee met on February 19, 2025, and unanimously voted to recommend that City Council appropriate an additional $800,000 in funding for the Forest Management and Fuel Reduction Project ; WHEREAS, the current balance of the NCIP Ending Balance account (31nunap) is $1,371,074, so sufficient funding is available for this action; WHEREAS, on August 13, 2024, the Planning Commission determined that this project is consistent with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2022, a Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project (SCH#2022080742) was approved by the Planning Commission (Resolution No. P22-024), superseding the originally approved IS-MND for the project that approved by the Planning Commission on December 8, 2020 (Resolution No. P20- 028). A Notice of Determination was filed according to CEQA requirements following Planning Commission’s adoption of the Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Project IS-MND.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby authorizes the Finance Director, or their designee, to appropriate $800,000 from the NCIP Ending Balance account (31nunap) to the Forest Management and Fuel Reduction Project account (ncp2501).

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 4, Packet Page 38 APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 5, Packet Page 39 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager to Sign an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement One Year Extension with MidPen Housing for Development of Affordable Housing at 587 and 593 Van Buren Street, 424 and 450 Madison Street (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council authorize the City Manager to
sign an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement one year
extension with MidPen Housing Corporation for the
properties located at 587 and 593 Van Buren Street
and 424 and 450 Madison Street.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Support efforts and policies that provide equitable
access to affordable housing in Monterey and the
region.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) supports
the City’s on-going housing efforts, including those
intended to serve extremely low, very low and lowincome residents. Moving forward with the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement is a necessary step to support
the City’s efforts to meet its Regional Housing Needs
Assessment allocation, should any new housing units
result from the subsequent Development and
Disposition Agreement and ground lease.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: Yes.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

As reported to the City Council in October 2024, the
City and MidPen have been working together to obtain
funding. The City obtained $110,598.05 in Permanent
Local Housing Allocation State funds for the project.

The City disbursed this money to MidPen to contribute
toward predevelopment costs. The PLHA funds are a
loan and will be paid back to the City pursuant to the
Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is considering
extending an Exclusive Negotiating
Agreement (ENA) with MidPen
Housing Corporation for one year to
develop affordable housing behind
City Hall.
 The extension supports the City's
efforts to provide equitable access
to affordable housing for extremely
low, very low, and low-income
residents.
 The City has secured significant
funding for the project, including
state funds, grants, and loans, with
substantial contributions from
MidPen Housing.
 The City Council has previously
approved multiple extensions and
agreements related to this project,
demonstrating ongoing progress
and commitment.
 The extension is necessary to
finalize environmental clearances
and continue predevelopment work
for the housing vouchers.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 7.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 1, Packet Page 40 №10/24
approved agreement, which is a State requirement. The City, with significant help from MidPen, also obtained a Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) grant from the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) for this project. Through this process, the City was awarded up to a maximum of $2,450,000 in REAP 2.0 funds. Due to the State budget, AMBAG reduced the City’s grant to a maximum of $2,305,450 to cover predevelopment costs. The City Council also approved a $1,500,000 loan to support the project. The terms of the loan are to be negotiated. MP Madison Street Associates, L.P. will fund the project through multiple sources, including loans, tax credits, housing vouchers, and grants.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378) because the City still retains discretion to approve, modify or not proceed with any project pending the outcome of the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement and further CEQA review. In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to extend the ENA with MidPen as a potential developer for the property located at 587 and 593 Van Buren Street and 424 and 450 Madison Street. Staff is not supporting this alternative because MidPen is an experienced affordable housing developer and substantial progress has been made.

DISCUSSION:

Background
The City issued a Request for Proposals on July 20, 2020 to solicit proposals to develop affordable housing on four City-owned properties. The properties were:
 Harbor Yard located at 417 Figueroa Street
 Parking Lot 14 located at 442 Adams Street
 Calle Principal Parking Garage – 438 Calle Principal
 A portion of the City Hall Campus on Madison Street between Dutra and Van Buren Streets consisting of four properties (587 and 593 Van Buren Street and 424 and 450 Madison Street).

Proposals were accepted on October 2, 2020. On February 16, 2021, the Council selected MidPen as the preferred developer for 417 Figueroa Street, 438 Calle Principal, 587 and 593 Van Buren Street and 424 and 450 Madison Street. The City Council approved an ENA with Mid Pen Housing on July 19, 2022 for the development of only the site located behind City Hall Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 2, Packet Page 41 №10/24
(587 and 593 Van Buren Street and 424 and 450 Madison Street). The City approved the 1st and 2nd ENA extensions administratively as allowed by the ENA. The 3rd ENA extension was approved by the City Council on March 19, 2024 via Resolution 24-037. The City Council approved an Affordable Housing and Property Disposition Agreement and Ground Lease between MP Madison Street Associates, L.P and City of Monterey on October 15, 2024 via Resolution 24-164. The City is finalizing the project’s NEPA documents for the housing vouchers. Since this work is still in progress, a fourth ENA Extension is proposed.

Analysis
Substantial progress has been made on the affordable housing project behind City Hall located at 587 and 593 Van Buren Street and 424 and 450 Madison Street including final preparation and approval of the Affordable Housing and Property Disposition Agreement and Ground Lease.

The City Council is requested to approve a fourth amendment to the ENA extending the negotiations to April 12, 2026 as staff is still working on the environmental clearances for the housing vouchers.

In conclusion, staff recommends the City Council direct the City Manager to sign an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement extension with MidPen Housing Corporation for the properties located at 587 and 593 Van Buren Street, 424 and 450 Madison Street.

KC
Attachment: 1. Draft Resolution
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 3, Packet Page 42 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT

ONE YEAR EXTENSION WITH MIDPEN HOUSING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AT 587 AND 593 VAN BUREN STREET, 424 AND 450 MADISON STREET WHEREAS, the City of Monterey currently experiences both high housing costs and a low inventory of affordable housing units;
WHEREAS, in October 2019, the Governor signed several bills that acknowledge the statewide housing crisis and provide funding for affordable housing; WHEREAS, in 2019 the City Council reviewed City owned properties to determine their potential to be developed for affordable housing in support of the City’s on-going housing efforts, including those intended to serve extremely low, very low and low-income residents; WHEREAS, this review showed the potential to support the City in meeting its Regional Housing Needs Assessment allocation, should any new housing units results from this effort; WHEREAS, on August 20, 2019 and September 3, 2019, the City Council received a report on a site analysis of City owned properties for affordable housing development. The Council directed staff to focus on potential sites located on Figueroa Street, Calle Principal, Adams Street and Van Buren/Madison Streets;
WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposals on July 20, 2020 to solicit proposals to develop affordable housing on four City owned sites consisting of properties located at 417 Figueroa Street, 442 Adams Street, 438 Calle Principal, 587 and 593 Van Buren Street, and 424 and 450 Madison Street;
WHEREAS, proposals were due on October 2, 2020, and the City received responsive proposals from five developers;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey received a responsive proposal for 587 and 593 Van Buren Street, and 424 and 450 Madison Street from MidPen Housing Corporation that proposes to use 100% of the property area for the development of affordable housing, providing that 100% of the proposed units will be permanently affordable housing, with an affordability mix of units at 30% AMI, 40% AMI, 50% AMI, and 60% AMI;
WHEREAS, the Council directed staff to negotiate an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with MidPen Housing Corporation for 587 and 593 Van Buren Street and 424 and 450 Madison Street;
WHEREAS, the Council approved an ENA with Mid Pen housing on July 19, 2022 via Resolution 22-104. This ENA was executed on August 15, 2022 and two amendments were approved on November 16, 2022 and March 22, 2023. The first amendment increased the due date for the preliminary development package from 90 days to 120 days. The second amendment extended to the agreement to April 12, 2024, and increased the due date for the Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 4, Packet Page 43 updated preliminary development package from 210 to 365 days. The third amendment extended the agreement to April 12, 2025 for additional environmental studies; WHEREAS, the City Council approved an Affordable Housing and Property Disposition Agreement and Ground Lease between MP Madison Street Associates, L.P and City of Monterey on October 15, 2024 via Resolution 24-164;
WHEREAS, Mid Pen housing has requested a fourth amendment so additional environmental studies can be completed and the draft amendment fulfills this request; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378) because the City still retains discretion to approve, modify or not proceed with any project pending the outcome of the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement and further CEQA review. In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability, and;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby authorizes City Manager to enter into an exclusive negotiating agreement extension to April 15, 2026, in a form approved by the City Attorney with Mid Pen Housing Corporation for development of affordable housing at 587 and 593 Van Buren Street and 424 and 450 Madison Street.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this ___ day of ____, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 5, Packet Page 44 Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 6, Packet Page 45 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Kimberly Cole, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Christine Davi, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Extend Urgency Ordinance No. 3696 to Temporarily Prohibit the Establishment and Operation of New Firearms and Ammunitions Retail Sales Businesses in the City for 10-Months and 15-Days Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council extend Urgency Ordinance No.
3696 for 10-months and 15-days pursuant to
Government Code section 65858(a) to temporarily
prohibit the establishment and operation of new
firearms and ammunitions retail sales businesses in the City.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing;
and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Persons must be licensed by the United States
Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to engage in the
business of manufacturing, importing, and/or dealing in firearms. There are nine different types of federal
firearms licenses as shown in Attachment 1.

The City’s business license ordinance established a
ministerial process. Issuance of a business license
does not grant permission to conduct business in the
City because the license is not regulatory; it is revenue generating only. (City Code section 19-2.)
The City’s Zoning Code does not regulate or restrict the establishment or operation of firearms or ammunition
retail sales businesses in most areas of the City,
Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is considering
extending Urgency Ordinance No.
3696 to temporarily prohibit new
firearms and ammunition retail sales
businesses in Monterey for 10
months and 15 days.
 The extension aims to give City staff
time to study and recommend
zoning code amendments and other
regulations to ensure appropriate
locations for these businesses.
 The urgency ordinance is necessary
to prevent potential compatibility
issues with surrounding land uses,
such as residential areas, schools,
and liquor stores.
 The ordinance extension requires a
4/5 vote from the City Council and is
intended to preserve public health,
safety, and welfare.
 There are currently five active
firearms and ammunition retail
businesses in the City, which would
not be affected by the extension.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 8.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 1, Packet Page 46 №10/24
including home occupations in residential areas. Given this, an urgency ordinance is recommended to temporarily halt this use until Staff have time to study appropriate buffers from sensitive uses (e.g., residences, schools, day cares, liquor stores) and research other regulations. This matter is urgent because without an extension of the moratorium, an unlimited number of firearms and ammunitions sales businesses may locate almost anywhere in the City without local regulations. When certain types of land uses are incompatible with each other, such as firearms stores in residential neighborhoods, it can lead to disputes and quality of life impacts.

Continuance of the urgency interim zoning ordinance is necessary to preserve the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of Monterey by preventing a proliferation of firearm business locations in the City without regard to the appropriateness of their location. Here, the location of a new firearm business at 301 Ocean Avenue, while legal, sits below residential units and near other sensitive uses, such as a preschool and a liquor store. This has brought to light potential vulnerabilities to the public caused by the absence of City regulations governing the location and operation of this type of business, and a corresponding urgent need to fix the problem. For example, in December 2024, it was reported that 20 firearms were stolen.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications in connection with adopting a moratorium ordinance.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decline to extend the duration of the urgency ordinance or it could shorten the period of time of the extension.

DISCUSSION:

At the February 4, 2025 City Council meeting, members of the public raised significant concerns about a new retail firearm shop that plans to operate at 301 Ocean Avenue, a location that is in close proximity to single family and multi-family residential units, a pre-school, and liquor store uses.

This prompted the City to adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 3696 because the City does not specifically regulate the establishment or operation of firearms or ammunitions retail sales Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 2, Packet Page 47 №10/24
businesses in the City. Rather, this retail use is principally permitted, meaning that it is not subject to special review or approval by the City in almost all zones in the City.

There are five (5) active business licenses in the City related to ammunition, guns, and firearms sales, three of which were established in the last nine months:
 License #1013736 - L&B Firearms (exp 6/30/25) 301 Ocean Ave. (Commercial Zoning C-1) established 10/24/24
 License #1013633 - Gallagher Ammunition (exp 6/30/25) 871 Alice St. (Residential Zoning R-3-5) established 9/12/24
 License #1010512 - JC Firearms & Ammo (exp 6/30/25) 2 Harris Ct. (Industrial Zoning I-R) established 2/12/21
 License #1013255 - Triggered Ammo & Apparel (exp 6/30/25) 532 Abrego (Planned Community Zoning PC) established 4/26/24
 License #97341 - Big 5 (exp 6/30/25) 2259 N Fremont St. (Planned Community Zoning PC) established sometime prior to 1995 Extending the duration of the urgency ordinance would temporarily prohibit the establishment and operation of new firearms retail sales businesses while City staff studies best practices and recommends zoning code amendments and other regulations that would apply to future applicants. Extension of the urgency ordinance would not affect the five businesses listed above.

An extension of the urgency ordinance requires findings that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare and that any additional principally permitted firearms businesses will result in that threat. Without a continuation of the temporary moratorium and absent extensive zoning regulations that govern the location of future firearms retail uses, new firearms retail establishments may result in compatibility issues with surrounding land uses and put the City at risk of impairing its substantial interests in economically sustainable development and community health and perceptions of safety. In December 2024, it was reported that 20 firearms were stolen from a City of Salinas gun shop.1 A continuation of the moratorium requires a 4/5 vote of the City Council and is for 10 months and 15 days and may be subsequently extended for one year.

The City may regulate the retail sales of firearm businesses to the extent it is not preempted by state law. A comprehensive summary of state firearm laws is set forth in this link:
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/cfl2021.pdf
More research and study are needed, however, at this time it appears that the City may regulate retail firearms businesses as follows:2
 Require adequate insurance.
 Confine operations to commercially zoned areas. As the operation of a firearm dealership is a commercial enterprise, there is a rational basis for confining that operation to commercially zoned areas.
1 Salinas gun store burglary: 20 firearms stolen, raising community concerns (KSBW, Dec. 31, 2024.)
2 Suter v. City of Lafayette (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 1109.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 3, Packet Page 48 №10/24
 Require that dealers be located away from residential areas, schools, liquor stores and bars. Because dealerships can be the targets of people who are or should be excluded from possessing weapons, it is reasonable to insist that dealerships be located away from residential areas, schools, liquor stores and bars.  Restrict any person under 18 years of age from entering or remaining within the premises without being accompanied by their parent or other adult legally responsible for the minor child where the firearms sales activity is the primary business performed at the site.

Extending the urgency ordinance imposing a moratorium on retail establishments selling firearms or ammunitions would allow staff time to research the issues and present a comprehensive proposal for Council consideration. Staff may recommend changes to the City’s home occupancy permit regulations, its Zoning Code, and business health and safety regulations to regulate retail sales of firearms and ammunition. Without the opportunity for this study, compatibility issues with surrounding land uses put the City at risk of impairing its substantial interests in compatible land uses and the public’s health, safety, and welfare. An extension of this moratorium is necessary to prevent principally permitted firearms businesses from being located almost anywhere in the City, which then gives these businesses a vested right to operate from those locations in the City and could have a detrimental effect on the community.

KC/cd
Attachments: 1. Types of Federal Firearms Licenses

2. Draft Urgency Ordinance
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 4, Packet Page 49

!"#$%&
'#
()
')*&)
+"+)

*%),!'

)''&-."
!-"(*!/

.1&/*

+"
2&/)"#

-
/)"/.'3
4)/'&
'.!'*,)#
()
'),5
67*&)
+"+)

*%),!'

)''&--
/)"/.'3
89:;
<=>?=@
A)"#)/

-
/)"/.'&*%)/ *%"
)'*/!(*
) )
()'
4"$
,/&B)/

-
/)"/.'&*%)/*%"
)'*/!(*
))
()'
A)"#)/

)'*/!(*
))
()'
CDE=@
F&##)(*&/&-
(!/
&'"
/)#
('
G>HIJ>KDI@=@
L"
!-"(*!/)/&- "..!

*
&
-&/-
/)"/.' &*%)/*%"
"..!

*
&
-&/)'*/!(*
))
()'
&/"/.&/1
)/(

+ "..!

*
&
L"
!-"(*!/)/&- -
/)"/.'&*%)/*%"
)'*/!(*
))
()'
L"
!-"(*!/)/&- )'*/!(*
))
()'0
"..!

*
&
-&/
)'*/!(*
))
()'
&/"/.&/1
)/(

+ "..!

*
&

MNOP@D=@
Q.1&/*)/&--
/)"/.'
&/"..!

*
&
-&/ -
/)"/.'&*%)/*%"
)'*/!(*
))
()'
&/"..!

*
&
&*%)/ *%"
"/.&/1
)/(

+ "..!

*
&
Q.1&/*)/&-
)'*/!(*
))
()'0 "..!

*
&
-&/ )'*/!(*
))
()'
&/"/.&/1
)/(

+ "..!

*
&
4!,#
'%)R5
67&
S!#5TU0VWTX YZ[\]^_]`abcdefghdij\\k_abcdefghe]lkmnnoap]lkmnnoqln`rfgcdehiiiq]\pq^nsATTACHMENT 1 Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 5, Packet Page 50 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY №08/22
EXTEND URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 3696 TO TEMPORARILY PROHIBIT THE

ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF NEW FIREARMS AND AMMUNITIONS SALES BUSINESSES IN THE CITY FOR 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, on February 18, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3696 to suspend the establishment and operation of new firearms and ammunitions sales businesses in the City. The City Council finds that it is necessary to continue the duration of the urgency ordinance for 10 months and 15 days pursuant to Government Code section 65858(a) to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. This ordinance is intended to temporarily prohibit the approval of any new firearms and ammunitions sales businesses in the City pending further review and study;
WHEREAS, the City’s adopted value drivers include “Quality of Life Strategic Priorities” to “[r]ecognize that public safety is a priority to ensure that our City is safe and welcoming to all, contributing to our economic vitality as a destination City,” and to “[r]espond effectively to neighborhood concerns;”
WHEREAS, the City’s business license ordinance established a ministerial process.

Issuance of a business license does not grant permission to conduct business in the City because the license is not regulatory; it is revenue generating only. (City Code section 19-2); WHEREAS, the City’s Zoning Code does not regulate or restrict the establishment or operation of firearms or ammunitions sales businesses in most areas of the City, including home occupations in residential areas. This matter is urgent because without a moratorium, an unlimited number of firearm sales businesses may locate almost anywhere in the City without local regulation. When certain types of land uses are incompatible with each other, such as firearm stores in residential neighborhoods, it can lead to disputes and quality of life impacts; WHEREAS, this urgency ordinance is necessary to preserve the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of Monterey by preventing the proliferation of firearms sale locations in the City without regard to the appropriateness of their location; WHEREAS, the location of a new firearm business at 301 Ocean Avenue, while legal, sits below residential units and near other sensitive uses, such as a preschool and a liquor store. This has brought to light potential vulnerabilities to the public caused by the absence of City regulations governing the location and operation of this type of business, and a corresponding urgent need to fix the problem;
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 6, Packet Page 51 2 WHEREAS, at the February 4, 2025 City Council meeting, members of the public raised significant concerns about a new retail firearm shop that plans to operate at 301 Ocean Avenue, a location that is in close proximity to single family and multi-family residential units, a preschool, and liquor store uses;
WHEREAS, in December 2024, it was reported that 20 firearms were stolen from a City of Salinas gun shop;1
WHEREAS, there are five (5) active business licenses in the City related to ammunitions, guns, and firearms sales and this urgency ordinance does not affect these five businesses, which are listed below:
 License #1013736 - L&B Firearms (exp 6/30/25) 301 Ocean Ave. (Commercial Zoning C-1) established 10/28/24
 License #1013633 - Gallagher Ammunition (exp 6/30/25) 871 Alice St. (Residential Zoning R-3-5) established 9/12/24
 License #1010512 - JC Firearms & Ammo (exp 6/30/25) 2 Harris Ct. (Industrial Zoning I-R) established 2/9/21
 License #1013255 - Triggered Ammo & Apparel (exp 6/30/25) 532 Abrego (Planned Community Zoning PC) established 4/26/24
 License #97341 - Big 5 (exp 6/30/25) 2259 N Fremont St. (Planned Community Zoning PC) established sometime before 1995 WHEREAS, three of the five businesses listed above commenced operations in the last nine months, indicating a trend in the establishment of this use; WHEREAS, without the extension of the temporary moratorium and absent extensive zoning regulations that govern the location of future firearms and ammunitions retail uses, new firearms and ammunitions retail establishments may result in compatibility issues with surrounding land uses and put the City at risk of impairing its substantial interests in economically sustainable development and community health and perceptions of safety; WHEREAS, more research and study are needed on potential regulations such as:2  Requiring adequate insurance.
 Confining operations to commercially zoned areas. As the operation of a firearm dealership is a commercial enterprise, there is a rational basis for confining that operation to commercially zoned areas.
 Requiring that dealers be located away from residential areas, schools, liquor stores and bars. Because dealerships can be the targets of people who are or should be excluded from possessing weapons, it is reasonable to insist that dealerships be located away from residential areas, schools, liquor stores and bars.  Restricting any person under 18 years of age from entering or remaining within the premises without being accompanied by their parent or other adult legally responsible for the minor child where the firearms sales activity is the primary business performed at the site.
1 Salinas gun store burglary: 20 firearms stolen, raising community concerns (KSBW, Dec. 31, 2024)
2 Suter v. City of Lafayette (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 1109.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 7, Packet Page 52 WHEREAS, not extending the moratorium has the potential to result in new retail uses that sell firearms or ammunitions without the proper analysis of any potential impacts to public health, safety, and welfare;
WHEREAS, Staff may recommend changes to the City’s home occupancy permit regulations, Zoning Code, and business health and safety regulations to regulate retail sales of firearms and ammunitions. Without the opportunity for this study, compatibility issues with surrounding land uses put the City at risk of impairing its substantial interests in compatible land uses and the public’s health, safety, and welfare;
WHEREAS, the extension of this moratorium is necessary to prevent principally permitted firearms and ammunitions businesses from being located almost anywhere in the City, which then gives these businesses a vested right to operate from those locations in the City and could have a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community.

Without this moratorium, the potential exists that establishment of new commercial operations engaged in the retail sale of firearms and ammunitions within the City without addressing appropriate regulations could result in incompatibility of land uses and adverse impacts on residents, businesses and neighborhoods that present a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare;
WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the foregoing conditions exist which require the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare through a moratorium pursuant to California Government Code section 65858; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

SECTION 2: The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 3: Moratorium. The establishment and operation of new firearms and ammunitions retail sales businesses in the City is prohibited.

SECTION 4: Effective Date. This extension of Urgency Ordinance 3696 is declared to be an urgency measure adopted pursuant to Government Code section 65858. As set forth in the findings above, this Ordinance is necessary for preserving the public safety, health, and welfare.

Pursuant to Government Code section 65858, this Ordinance is effective immediately by a 4/5 vote of the City Council and shall be in full force and effect for 10 months and 15 days from the Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 8, Packet Page 53 4 date of its adoption. This 10-month and 15-day period may be subsequently extended by the City Council for one year in accordance with the provisions of Government Code section 65858.

SECTION 5: Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance, including the application of such part or provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 9, Packet Page 54 Council
Agenda Report
№08/22
FROM: Rafaela T. King, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Amending and Restating Resolution 24-018, The Master Fee Schedule, to Update the Community Development, Fire Department, Parks and Recreation, Library and Museums, Police Department, Public Works Department, Parking Division, and Harbor Division Fees (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution to Amend and
Restate Resolution 24-018, the Master Fee Schedule to
update fees in certain departments effective July 1, 2025.

Attached draft City Council resolution, if adopted, will amend the fee schedule for the Community Development,
Fire Department, Parks and Recreation, Library and
Museums, Police Department, Public Works Department,
Parking Division, and Harbor Division fees.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources
through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining
operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary
long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community
partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Proposition 26 applies only to fees that are “imposed” by government. Determining whether a charge is “imposed”
turns on the nature of the service and other factors, such as: whether the charge is in connection with a service that the city is statutorily obligated to provide; whether the charge is in connection with a service for which the city is the exclusive provider within its service territory; whether the charge is in connection with a service, product, or opportunity the city provides in competition with other, particularly private enterprises; or whether the charge is established by voluntary negotiations. League of Cal.

Cities, Proposition 26 and 218 Implementation Guide
(2021), at p. 58.)
For fees that are subject to Proposition 26, the City bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the fee is not a tax, that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable cost of the
Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is considering
adopting a resolution to amend and
update the Master Fee Schedule for
various departments, effective July
1, 2025.
 The proposed fee updates aim to
ensure fees reflect the actual cost of
services provided and achieve full
cost recovery where applicable.
 The fee adjustments include
changes for Community
Development, Parks and
Recreation, Library and Museums,
Police Department, Public Works
Department, Parking Division, and
Harbor Division.
 Parks and Recreation fees will be
adjusted annually based on the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) to
streamline cost recovery.
 The Police Department's fee
changes are primarily due to
increased staffing costs and a
comprehensive accounting of
services.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 9.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 1, Packet Page 55 governmental activity, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payor bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the payor’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity. (Cal. Const., Art. XIII C §1, subd. (e); League of Cal. Cities, Proposition 26 and 218 Implementation Guide (2021).) This means that all revenue sources are taxes requiring voting approval unless an exception applies. There are seven enumerated exceptions.

It is good fiscal and budget policy to regularly review the City’s fee schedules to ensure that the fees charged to citizens are in alignment with the cost of services provided to the citizens of Monterey.

This action is also consistent with the City policy and practice to recover costs reasonably borne to provide regulations, products, or services as set forth in 19-102. “Cost reasonably borne” include direct and indirect costs, including but not limited to maintenance, contracted services, salaries and supplies.

This is also consistent with the Council policy that the Parks and Recreation Commission review existing fees and recommend adjustments to the City Council for approval and implementation.

Most fees were not examined for adjustment and remain unchanged. They are included in the Master Fee Schedule for administrative purposes only (i.e., to maintain the Master Fee Schedule as a consolidated document) but are not considered part of the public hearing process.

Certain fees also were not examined as they will be adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The action would update the City’s Master Fee Schedule as seen in Exhibit A. Implications and considerations to City Departments are presented per department in the discussion section.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The Council could choose not to approve these fees; however, staff does not recommend this alternative. Allocating direct and indirect costs of providing services incurred by the City is a Government Finance Office Association (GFOA) best practice. Reviewing these costs on an Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 2, Packet Page 56 annual basis is a prudent fiscal policy. Additionally, this review provides the opportunity to develop new fees for the city as appropriate due to changes in law or other requirements.

The Master Fee Schedule incorporates the Board of Library Trustees’ recommendation to remove late fines for books and materials in order to provide equitable access. Alternatively, the City Council could choose not to remove late fines from the Master Fee Schedule.

DISCUSSION:

Community Development
The City Code (Section 19-104) contains specific requirements for development project fees.

Fee increases are intended to ensure that they reflect increases in the cost of services.

Furthermore, the City Code requires a 100% cost recovery for development services. Staff have reviewed and updated each permit type and person hours required to complete a specific permit. Rates were increased to the current fully burdened staff rate. A public hearing is required prior to the City Council taking any action on new or increased project fees or charges.

Proposed planning fees to be added include:
- Multifamily (MF) or Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overlay Administrative Review (Tier 1 – Tier 3)
- Historical Preservation – Prepare Historic Intensive Survey - Environmental Review - Addendum and Exemption
- Zoning Clearance Permit
Fees proposed to be deleted include - pre-application, undocumented dwelling units and home occupation permits. City staff no longer see the benefit of a pre-application fee. The staff regularly meet with the applicants and no fee is needed to cover this service. Since the passage of new ADU laws, there is no longer a need for an undocumented dwelling unit process. The City Council repealed the home occupation permit process in 2020 (Ordinance 3620).

Building Division:

Headers were changed on the page titles to clarify that the Building Permits and Inspections fees were part of the Community Development Department and separate from the Public Works Department. Pages were reorganized to allow the Community Development Department pages to remain together and encroachment permits were moved to the Public Works page.

The graduated valuation tables have been reduced to remove the “Bldg Only” category. In lieu of charging individual trades based on lower scales, the Division utilizes separate electrical, mechanical, and plumbing permits as identified in the individual fees page. Fees for work based upon valuation utilize the “All Work” category. To keep reroofing permits within appropriate ranges, the maximum value for residential reroofing has been set at $25,000.

Solar panels have been moved to the Building Permits and Inspections page and they have a state-mandated maximum fee of $450. Residential generator installations and swimming pool demolitions have been added to the fixed fee category. Fees for additional inspections and Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 3, Packet Page 57 additional plan review have been replaced with hourly rates for those services and hourly rates for administrative services and building official reviews have been added.

Fire Department
The Fire department is proposing to delete the fees for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Fire Prevention Bureau Re-Inspections. Life and Safety reinspection fees are being added for the 3rd and subsequent inspections.

Fire False Alarm Response adjusted to fully burdened cost not to exceed $12,000. Per City Code Sec. 22-9.1 d. Whenever any employee of the City is required to respond to an alarm which has been activated falsely, which is determined to have been preventable by the permittee, his agents or employees, a service fee shall be imposed upon the permittee by the City in a given month in an amount to be determined by the City Council by resolution.

Additional fees are being proposed for Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Automatic Fire Sprinkler System 361+ Heads and Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees - Emergency Responder Communication Coverage System
Library and Museums
The Board of Library Trustees supports removing overdue late fees for most library materials to provide equitable access to library materials and to be consistent with all other libraries on the Monterey Peninsula. Replacement charges will still be charged for materials that are lost or damaged. Technology updates such as automatic renewals and SMS (Text) notifications along with updated procedures have been added by the Library Department.

Printing fees have been increased to reflect updated costs incurred for new print management systems. The Library is implementing a new public printing system that allows color printing from public computers and mobile printing from personal devices; fees will be increased to be consistent with other libraries in the area and to recover costs of new equipment.

Commercial filming permit costs have been moved from the Police Department and will be taken over by the Library & Museums Department. In addition to the commercial permit fee, hourly costs are being added for cost recovery of staff that are needed to monitor historic properties. Staff monitor costs are often implemented at other historic buildings in the area, and the department needs to be present in historic buildings or available nearby during filming.

Parks and Recreation & Cemetery
Parks and Recreation is increasing multiple fees in FY26. Many fees are automatically increased annually with a CPI adjustment in order to achieve cost recovery efficiently and reduce the need to manually adjust fees in future years. All other proposed fee adjustments have been reviewed independently to account for the cost of providing the service, enrollment, and surveys of fees for similar services offered in other communities. Increasing fees in Parks and Recreation helps the City operate safe, clean, and modern facilities for residents, members, program participants, and the public at large.

For most fees, there is a resident rate and a non-resident rate. The non-resident rate takes into account the fact that Monterey residents contribute to the City’s General Fund through a Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 4, Packet Page 58 percentage of their property tax contributions (either directly as property owners, or indirectly as renters). It is common for public agencies offering parks and recreation services to charge residents less for program and service fees than non-residents, and that has been the case for the City of Monterey. Also, the City policy, established in Resolution 92-061, has been to subsidize Monterey Sports Center operations by 25% and recover from customers 75%. The fees support the cost recovery goals established for the City policy.

Police Department
The Police Department has determined that the fee schedule needs to be adjusted to recover the full costs reasonably borne for providing City services. Recommended fee changes take into consideration hourly staffing costs to provide these department services. Fee increases are primarily attributable to salary increases, indirect costs, and a more comprehensive accounting of actual services associated with the fee. The calculations are based on ‘Costs Reasonably Borne’ as defined in City Code Article 4, Section 19-102. Fee increases of note:

Security Alarm Permit: This service includes the collection of payment, submission and review of the application, data entry into the Records Management System (RMS), scanning and attaching the application to the RMS entry, printing of the permit and mailing it to the applicant. The proposed fee reflects the estimated FY26 fully burdened cost for the average time spent providing this service.

Public Works Department
Public Works is increasing multiple fees in FY25. Many fees are automatically increased annually with a CPI adjustment in order to achieve cost recovery efficiently and reduce the need to manually adjust fees in future years. Increasing fees in the Harbor/Marina and Paring Divisions helps the City operate safe, clean, and modern facilities for residents and the public at large.

Harbor & Marina
Several adjustments have been made to the Harbor & Marina fee schedule to clarify existing charges and reflect the services provided. The fishing vessel rate, a long-standing fee, was omitted from the fee schedule last fiscal year and is being re-added. Similarly, the end tie per foot rate, a necessary fee for charging transient usage of dock space, which was also excluded is being re-added. The Outer Harbor Mooring (OHM) Assignment Fee is the only monthly fee currently charged to OHM tenants. However, as all other OHM fees are either quarterly or annual, the Assignment Fee will transition to a quarterly fee to maintain consistency. The Marina Impound Fee will be renamed the Marina Storage Fee to more accurately represent the service being provided. An annual fee for the Mailbox (Liveaboard) service is being added, as this service was not previously included in the fee schedule. A footnote has been added to the Yellow Boat Dock's per month fee, specifying that per-use charges may apply up to four times per month, but the total charges will not exceed the monthly fee if the dock is used more than four times. Lastly, the Wharf I and II transient vessel fees have been split to reflect the fact that Wharf II does not offer utilities, resulting in a reduced rate for vessels moored there.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 5, Packet Page 59 Parking Division
Under California Vehicle Code Section 40226, a valid Disabled Placard must be displayed when a vehicle is parked in a marked disabled parking space. Failure to display a valid placard or the misuse of such spaces may result in a significant fine. However, the City is authorized to charge an administrative fee, not to exceed $25, as an alternative to the fine when an individual can provide proof of having a valid Disabled Placard at the time the citation was issued. Staff is suggesting setting the administrative fee at $15, which is below the maximum allowable amount of $25. The fee will be periodically reviewed to ensure compliance with California Vehicle Code regulations and to reflect changes in administrative costs.

In addition, as part of the Master Fee Schedule resolution (Reso 24-018) approved in 2024, a phased rate increase was implemented for parking lots located within the Coastal Zone. This phased increase applies through Fiscal Year 2028. For the upcoming Fiscal Year 2026, the second phase of the approved rate increase will be implemented as part of the ongoing adjustment process.

Additional Considerations
The City relies on several key indicators in order to adjust its fees for inflation. Primarily, this is in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Fees impacted by the CPI are marked with a footnote in Exhibit A – Master Fee Schedule.

Except as noted in the fee schedule, fees shall be adjusted annually on July 1st based on the CPI for San Francisco Area (San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) April addition and rounded to the nearest fifty cent ($0.50)
Per City of Monterey City Council Resolution 23-139, payments made to certain departments in the City of Monterey using a credit/debit card will include a service fee of 2.9%. This includes payments to Building, Cemetery, Finance, Fire, Harbor/Marina, Monterey Conference Center, Community Development, Planning, and the Police Department. Payments may be made in cash/check in person without a Service Fee. Service Fees are non-refundable. Fees subject to this Service Fee are marked with a footnote in the Master Fee Schedule.

RTK
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A – Master Fee Schedule
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 6, Packet Page 60 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№010/23
AMENDING AND RESTATUNG RESOLUTION 24-018, THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE, TO

UPDATE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, PARKS AND RECREATION, LIBRARY AND

MUSEUMS, POLICE DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, PARKING DIVISION,

AND HARBOR DIVISION FEES
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 14-132 to establish a Master Fee Schedule, and since that time it has been amended and restated seven times, most recently ; Resolution 15-215, which on February 20, 2024, when the City Council adopted Resolution 24- 018, which amended and restated 23-149;
WHEREAS, the City Code calls for a full analysis of costs reasonably borne not less than every five years. Staff conduct cost of services studies to review and calculate the City’s expenditures linked to a particular activity in order to determine the fee amount and cost recovery level. Therefore, from time to time, the Master Fee Schedule has been amended to reflect changes or adjustments to fees as necessary to recover costs pursuant to that policy; WHEREAS, this resolution amends only the Community Development, Parks and Recreation, Police Department, Public Works Department, Parking Division, and Library and Museum fee schedules; it does not alter any other fees previously adopted by the City Council and those are restated along with the amended fees in Exhibit A to this Resolution; WHEREAS, the City provides a variety of services to the public which benefit the entire community, individuals, or businesses. For certain services such as regulatory fees or recreational activities, the City recovers partially or fully the cost of providing these services, which would have been otherwise paid from the General Fund; WHEREAS, where required by law, the amount of the new or increased fees and charges is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable cost of the governmental activity, and the manner in which those costs are allocated to the payer’s burden on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity;
WHEREAS, certain fees in the fee schedule are for government services provided directly to the payor that are not provide to those not charged. Where required by law, the amount of these fees do not exceed the reasonable costs to the City of providing the services.

Consequently, pursuant to California Constitution, Art. XIII C, Section 1(e)(2), such fees are not a tax;
WHEREAS, Propositions 13, 218, and 26 have placed both substantive and procedural limits on cities’ ability to impose fees and charges. Collectively these constitutional amendments provide safeguards against taxes being imposed without a vote of the people; WHEREAS, Proposition 26 contains a requirement that the local government “bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a levy, charge, or other exaction is not a tax, that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the governmental activity, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payor bear a Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 7, Packet Page 61 2 fair or reasonable relationship to the payor’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity.” (California Constitution, Article XIII C, Section 1); WHEREAS, Community Development Department has reviewed and updated each type permit type to account for required hours to complete a specific permit. Rates were increased to the current fully burdened staff rate. The City Code which requires a 100% cost recovery for development services and those increases are included in the update. Other fees for permits have been proposed to be deleted including pre-application, undocumented dwelling units and home occupation permits;
WHEREAS, Fire Department is deleting fees for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Fire Prevention Bureau Re-Inspections. Life and Safety reinspection fees are being added for the 3rd and subsequent inspections, proposing additional fees for Fire Protection System Plan Check FeesAutomatic Fire Sprinkler System 361+ Heads and Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees - Emergency Responder Communication Coverage System and adjusting fees for Fire False Alarm Response to fully burdened cost not to exceed $12,000.

WHEREAS, Library and Museums is increasing printing fees to reflect updated costs and recovery, and adding hourly costs for filming permit fees deleting fees for overdue items; WHEREAS, Public Works – Harbor & Marina has made several adjustments to clarify existing charges and reflect the services provided. Other changes include changing monthly fees to quarterly to be consistent with other fees, name changes of fees and re-adding a transient usage of dock space;
WHEREAS, Public Works – Parking has added an administration fee for failure to display a valid Disabled Placard, and has included the second phase of approved rate increases for parking lots located within the Coastal Zone;
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation has many fees that are automatically increased annually with a CPI adjustment. All other proposed fee adjustments have been reviewed independently account for the cost of providing the service; WHEREAS, Police Department is proposing a Security Alarm Permit fee to reflect the fully burdened costs for the average time spent providing the service; WHEREAS, the data indicating the amount of the cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the service for which the fee or service charge is levied was made available to the public for inspection upon request at least 10 days before the adoption of this resolution; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 8, Packet Page 62 3 change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings, along with the agenda report and data (Fee Study), of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY it hereby amends and restates Resolution 24-018, the City Master Fee Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A. The increased fees shall be effective July 1, 2025. Exhibit A will be administratively amended to add CPI increases that take effect prior to July 1, 2025.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that in the event of any challenge to any increased or new fee adopted herein, including any challenge pursuant to Cal. Constitution, Article XIIIC, the formerly adopted fee shall then be in effect unless and until the challenged fee becomes effective.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 9, Packet Page 63 Master Fee Schedule*
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Administrative Services
Community Development - Planning
Community Development - Cannabis
Community Development - Building Permits & Inspections
Library
Monterey Conference Center
Museums & Cultural Arts
Parking
Parks & Recreation
Parks & Recreation - Cemetery
Public Safety - Fire
Public Safety - Police
Public Works - Engineering
Public Works - Harbor & Marina
Public Works - Sewer
Updated July 1, 2025
*Per City of Monterey City Council Resolution 23-139, payments made to certain City of Monterey departments using a credit/debit card will include a service fee of 2.9%. This includes payments to Building, Cemetery, Finance, Fire, Harbor/Marina, Monterey Conference Center, Community Development, Planning, and the Police Department. Payments may be made by cash/check in person without a Service Fee. Service Fees are non-refundable.

Bid Protest & Bidder Responsibility Appeals Fees

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 10, Packet Page 64 DESCRIPTION FY 26 FEE FY 25 FEE
General
Agenda and Minutes Mailing Service, Per Year1 $45.50 $44.00 Agenda Packet Subscription Service -
Council, Planning Commission,
Arch. Review Committee, Per Year1 $244.00 $235.00
Agenda Packet Subscription Service -
All other Boards and Commissions, Per Year1 $62.50 $62.50 Certification of Documents $1.00 per document $1.00 per document Notary Service (per signature) IAW GC 8211 - $15.00 IAW GC 8211 - $15.00 Transparency Reproduction $1.50 each $1.50 each
Fax Service - Send $4.00 first page, $3.00 each add'l page $4.00 first page, $3.00 each add'l page Fax Service - Receive $2.00 first page, $1.00 each add'l page $2.00 first page, $1.00 each add'l page CD/DVD/Flash or other drive for providing records Exact cost of disk or device Exact cost of disk or device Postage and packaging for shipping records Exact cost Exact cost Publication of optional Candidate Statement in the
Voter Guide
100% of the amount determined by the Monterey
County Elections Department, to be paid by an
advance deposit of the estimated total, and to be
trued up following the County’s issuance of the actual
cost following the election.
100% of the amount determined by the Monterey
County Elections Department, to be paid by an
advance deposit of the estimated total, and to be
trued up following the County’s issuance of the actual
cost following the election.

Deposit for Filing a Notice of Intent to Circulate
Initiative Petition $200.00 $200.00
Going-out-of-business or Fire Sale Permit -
initial application (up to 30 days) $25.00 $25.00
Going-out-of-business or Fire Sale Permit -
First Renewal (30 to 60 days) $50.00 $50.00
Going-out-of-business or Fire Sale Permit -
Second (final) Renewal (60 to 90 days) $10.00 per day $10.00 per day Duplicate Business License Fee $5.00 $5.00
Returned check Processing $25.00 $25.00
PW Engineering Maps and Documents $3.00 per square foot $3.00 per square foot Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, EIRs, Budgets $20.00 $20.00 Photocopying Services - Conference Center $0.25 per page $0.25 per page Photocopying Services - Public Works $0.18 per page (11x17) $0.18 per page (11x17) Photocopying or Printing Services -
All others including Public Records $0.10 per page (8.5x11) $0.10 per page (8.5x11) Ryan Ranch Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility, 20-
foot space, per month.1 $74.00 $71.50
Ryan Ranch Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility, 25-
foot space, per month.1 $93.50 $90.00
Ryan Ranch Recreational Vehicle Storage Facility, 30-
foot space, per month.1 $111.00 $107.00
Appeals Hearing Board - Appeals Fee $881.61 $881.61
Disabled Access Appeals Board - Appeals Fee $881.61 $881.61 Building and Housing Appeals Board - Appeals Fee $881.61 $881.61 Appeal of Marina Decisions to Council equal to fine asessed by Harbormaster equal to fine asessed by Harbormaster Appeal of East Anchorage Decisions to Council equal to fine asessed by Harbormaster equal to fine asessed by Harbormaster ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES*

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 11, Packet Page 65 DESCRIPTION FY 26 FEE FY 25 FEE
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES*
Appeal of Yellow Boat Permits to Council equal to fine asessed by Harbormaster equal to fine asessed by Harbormaster Weed Abatement Fee Appeal to be set by resolution to be set by resolution Tobacco Retail License Fee $297.00 $297.00
Monterey City Council Chamber Rental Fees
Council Chamber facility (includes use of furniture,
kitchenette (sink, counter, pod-style coffee maker),
bathrooms, microphones, connections for laptop
computers, and operation by City staff of audio-visual
equipment (document camera, projector, and
projection screen)1
$83.00 per hour (3 hour minimum) $83.00 per hour (3 hour minimum) Council Chamber facility - Overtime Rate1
$52.00 per 15 minutes the Chamber is used past
reserved time
$52.00 per 15 minutes the Chamber is used past
reserved time
Television Broadcast cameras and equipment
(requires Access Monterey Peninsula (AMP) personnel
be separately contracted/retained to operate equip)1
$259.50 per reservation $259.50 per reservation
City Support Staff1 $73.50 per staff member hour $73.50 per staff member hour 1 Fees shall be adjusted annually in July based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The CPI increase shall be based on the published CPI for San Francisco Area (San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) April edition and rounded to the nearest fifty cent (0.50)
*Subject to 2.9% service fee.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 12, Packet Page 66 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Bid Protest
Purchases of goods, services, public works projects, etc. subject to informal bidding or requests for proposals $100.00 $100.00
Public Works Projects subject to formal bidding up to $1 million and formal requests for proposals $250.00 $250.00
Public Works Projects over $1 million and less than $5 million $500.00 $500.00 Public Works Projects $5 million and over $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Bidder Responsibility Appeals
Purchases of goods, services, public works projects, etc. subject to informal bidding –appeals without a hearing $100.00 $100.00
Purchases of goods, services, public works projects, etc. subject to informal bidding - appeals with a hearing $500.00 $500.00
Public Works Projects subject to formal bidding up to $1 million and formal requests for proposals – appeals without a hearing $250.00 $250.00 Public Works Projects subject to formal bidding up to $1 million and formal requests for proposals – appeals with a hearing $750.00 $750.00 Public Works Projects over $1 million and less than $5 million – appeals without a hearing $500.00 $500.00
Public Works Projects over $1 million and less than $5 million – appeals with a hearing $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Public Works Projects $5 million and over – appeals without a hearing $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Public Works Projects $5 million and over – appeals with a hearing $1,500.00 $1,500.00 BID PROTEST & BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY APPEALS FEES*
*Subject to 2.9% service fee.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 13, Packet Page 67 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Architectural Review - ARC Major 1 $5,116 $4,759.56
Architectural Review - ARC Minor 1 $2,767 2,182.40
Architectural Review - Admin Major 1 $1,692 1,347.84
Architectural Review - Admin Minor 1 $671 376.28
MF or RHNA - Tier 1 $1,595 No current fee
MF or RHNA - Tier 2 $2,767 No current fee
MF or RHNA - Tier 3 $5,116 No current fee
Architectural Review - Signs ARC/HPC Review, including Historic Permit 1 $1,803 1,668.59 Architectural Review - Signs Minor 1 $839 428.18
Historical Preservation - Mills Act Request w/rezone 1** $5,534 4,383.04 Historical Preservation - Mills Act Request w/o rezone1** $3,899 3,235.98 Historical Preservation - Demolition Review 1 $657 393.6 Historical Preservation - Historical Permit, major 1** $3,592 2,131.66 Historical Preservation - Historical Permit, admin1 ** $853 557.26 Historical Preservation - Historic Report, review1** $2,360 1,057.45 Hisotric Preservation - Removal from Historic Survey1** $1,857 1,681.49 Historic Preservation - Prepare Historic Intensive Survey $6,000 Deposit No current fee Conditional Use Permits -Planning Commission Major (deposit) $5,763 $4,000.00 deposit Conditional Use Permits - Planning Commision Minor 1 $3,159 2,483.42 Conditional Use Permits - Zoning Administrator 1 $2,238 1,050.46 Conditional Use Permits - Temporary 1 $475 376.28
Variances/Parking Adjustment - Major Planning Commission 1 $3,788 1,965.97 Variances/Parking Adjustment - Minor Zoning Administrator 1 $2,238 1,050.46 Subdivisions - Tentative Subdivision Map (includes preliminary and final) $6,000 deposit $6,000 deposit Subdivisions - Covenant of Easement 1 $2,910 387.17
Subdivisions - Minor Subdivisions 1 $8,026 5,015.10
Subdivisions - Lot Line Adjustment 1 $4,266 4,420.84
Subdivisions - Certificate of Compliance 1 $2,122 1,592.29 Lot Merger 1 $1,607 936.28
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT - PLANNING FEES*

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 14, Packet Page 68 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT - PLANNING FEES*
Environmental Review - Environmental Impact Report $100,000 Deposit deposit based on cost
estimate
Environmental Review - Addendum/Other $25,000 Deposit New Fee Environmental Review - Environmental Initial Study
leading to a Mitigated Negative Declaration or Negative Declaration $20,000 Deposit $4,000 deposit Environmental Review - Exemption $273 New fee
Text or Map Admendments -
General Plan $8,062 $4,000 deposit
Text of Map Amendments - Specific Plan/Area Plan or Zoning $6,252 $4,000 deposit Text or Map Admendments - Local Coastal Plan $5,000 deposit $5,000 deposit Annexation $25,000 deposit $5,000 deposit
Permits - Sidewalk or Food Vending Permit 1 $293 $228.36 Zoning Affidavit 1 $1,931 $375.76
Permits - Permit Extension 1 $1,342 $1,053.05
Permits - Permit Amendment 2/3 of current permit fee 2/3 of permit fee Permits - Special Permits (bingo, pet) 1 $293 $228.36
Permits - Temporary Sign 1 $28 $20.24
Permits - Tree Permit Associated with Development (ARC) 1 $953 $769.68 Permits - Tree Permit Associated with Development (Administrative) 1 $407 $0.00 Zoning Clearance Permit $42 No current fee
Appeals - Of Decisions of Staff, ZA, ARC and
Environmental Determination to the Planning Commission 1 $2,099 $974.30
Appeals - Of Decisions of Planning Commission to the City Council 1 $2,977 $1,905.25 SB9 Ministerial Review1 $8,026 $1,127.76
SB35 Ministerial Review1 $5,116 $2,212.16
Rental Registry Program - Compliance (per unit)3 $50 $50 1 Per City Code Sec. 19-103, Fee includes CPI adjustments, for applicable fees (SF, April). 2 Fees for Solar Panel Inspection are set by the State of California 3 Rental Registry Compliance Fees are Effective Jan. 4, 2024 *Subject to 2.9% service fee.
** Solar arrays, cisterns, and safe parking are exempt from architectural review, historical preservation, use permit and variance fees.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 15, Packet Page 69 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Application Review - Phase I (per applicant) $1,510.00 $1,510.00 Application Review - Phase II (per applicant) $3,335.00 $3,335.00 Application Review - Phase III (per applicant) $1,840.00 $1,840.00 Application Review - Phase IV (per applicant) $2,360.00 $2,360.00 Background Check (per owner) $300.00 $300.00
Testing Laboratory Application Review (per applicant) $2,425.00 $2,425.00 Temporary Cannabis Event Application Review (per applicant) $1,610.00 $1,610.00 Out-of-City Retail/Distribution Application Review (per applicant) $70.00 $70.00 Annual Cannabis Compliance Fee (per applicant) $2,395.00 $2,395.00 Cannabis Audit (per permittee) $6,500.00 $6,500.00
Cannabis Business Permit Renewal (per applicant) $780.00 $780.00 Zone Clearance (per applicant) $238.00 $140.00

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Cannabis*
*Subject to 2.9% service fee.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 16, Packet Page 70 Low Range High Range Increment
$0.00 $2,000 1000 $108.70 $0.00 $104.72 $0.00
$2,000.01 $3,000 1000 $118.93 $0.00 $114.57 $0.00
$3,000.01 $25,000 1000 $118.93 $33.53 $114.57 $32.30
$25,000.01 $50,000 1000 $856.56 $24.20 $825.20 $23.31
$50,000.01 $100,000 1000 $1,461.68 $16.75 $1,408.17 $16.14 $100,000.01 $500,000 1000 $2,299.91 $13.42 $2,215.71 $12.93 $500,000.01 $1,000,000 1000 $7,668.36 $11.38 $7,387.63 $10.96 $1,000,000.01 $99,999,999,999,999 1000 $13,358.57 $7.55 $12,869.53 $7.28 Building Permit Fees - Project Valuation2
Low Range High Range Increment
$0.00 $1,000.00 1000 $108.70 $0.00 $104.72 $0.00
$1,000.01 $2,000.00 1000 $152.20 $0.00 $146.63 $0.00
$2,000.01 $25,000.00 1000 $152.20 $51.60 $146.63 $49.71 $25,000.01 $50,000.00 1000 $2,268.84 $37.21 $2,185.78 $35.85 $50,000.01 $100,000.00 1000 $2,268.84 $25.79 $2,185.78 $24.85 $100,000.01 $500,000.00 1000 $3,558.88 $18.50 $3,428.60 $17.82 $500,000.01 $1,000,000.00 1000 $11,815.58 $17.51 $11,383.03 $16.87 $1,000,000.01 $9,999,999,999.99 1000 $20,574.61 $11.61 $19,821.40 $11.19 2 Project Valuation may require estimates by a licensed contractor subject to approval by the Building Official (max residential roofing value is $25,000) *Subject to 2.9% service fee
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT - BUILDING PERMITS & INSPECTIONS* FY25 FEE1
Fee Amount
1 Fee amounts will include CPI adjustments from April 2024 SF CPI.

DESCRIPTION
Plan Check - Project Valuation2
FY26 FEE1
Fee Amount

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 17, Packet Page 71 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Building Permits
Investigative Fee for work without permit(s) Cost of permit Cost of permit Missed inspections or work not complete1 $170.60 $118.33 Sewer Lateral Review Fee1 $133.60 $128.71
Plumbing Permit - Minor (i.e., water heater, sewer lateral)1 $156.23 $150.51 Electrical Permit - Minor (i.e., replace a service panel)1 $156.23 $150.51 Mechanical Permit - (i.e., replace a furnace) Minor1 $156.23 $150.51 Generator Permit - Electric Only Fee $275.00 No current fee Generator Permit - Plumbing Only Fee $275.00 No current fee Generator Permit - Electric & Plumbing together (Class B license req'd) $550.00 No current fee Residential Solar/PV Installation Permit (under 10kW)2 $450.00 $450.00 Residential Property Inspections Reports -
Single Family Dwelling1 $174.55 $168.16
Hourly Inspection1 $170.60 $118.33
Hourly Plan Check Fee1 $170.60 $124.56
Hourly Administrative Services Fee1 $111.00 No current fee Hourly Building Official Services Fee1 $250.00 No current fee Address Change1 $88.35 $85.12
Duplicate Job Card1 $61.41 $59.17
Revision (minimum fee - billed at hourly rates)1 $61.41 $59.17 Residential Swimming Pool Demo/Abandonment Permit $675.00 No current fee General Plan Fee
15% of building permit
fee
15% of building permit
fee
*Subject to 2.9% service fee.
1 Fee amount includes CPI adjustments, for applicable fees (SF, April). 2 Residential solar permit fees are set by the State of California for 10kW and under 3 Fees not listed above may be calculated either by using valuation or hourly estimates

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PERMITS & INSPECTION FEES*,3

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 18, Packet Page 72 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Overdue Fines - Adult Materials
(includes Audio Cassettes, CDs, Books, Magazines,
DVDs, Videos) No Charge $0.50/day to a max of $10.00
Overdue Fines - Teen Materials
(includes Audio Cassettes, CDs, Books, Magazines,
DVDs, Videos) No Charge $0.25/day to a max of $5.00
Overdue Fines - Youth Materials
(includes Audio Cassettes, CDs, Books, Magazines,
DVDs, Videos) No Charge $0.25/day to a max of $5.00
Overdue Fines - Laptop Computers No Charge $5.00/hour to a max of $50.00 Overdue Fines - Telescopes No Charge $5.00/day to a max of $50.00 Lost/Damaged Materials - Books Cost of item Cost of item Lost/Damaged Materials - Magazines Adult $10.00 / Youth & Teen $5.00 Adult $10.00 / Youth & Teen $5.00 Library Cards - California Resident No Charge No Charge Library Cards - Out of State Resident $10.00/month $10.00/month Duplicate (Replacement) Library Card No Charge No Charge Photocopying Services - Library
$0.25 per single-sided black & white copy,
$0.50 per single-sided color copy
$0.10 per single-sided black & white copy,
$0.25 per single-sided color copy
Microfilm copies - Library
$0.25 per single-sided black & white copy,
electronic copy, no charge $0.00
Print-outs from Internet Stations
$0.25 per single-sided black & white copy,
$0.50 per single-sided color copy $0.10 per printed page Meeting Room Use - Community Room
(must be non-profit org w/ approved application on
file) REMOVE LINE $0.00
Meeting Room Use - Conference Room
(must be non-profit org w/ approved application on
file) REMOVE LINE $0.00
Pacific Biological Laboraties3 $60.00 (private group, 1-4 people) $60.00 (private group, 1-4 people) Colton Hall Museum3 $60.00 (private group, 1-4 people) $60.00 (private group, 1-4 people) Presidio of Monterey Museum3 $60.00 (private group, 1-4 people) $60.00 (private group, 1-4 people) Commercial Filming Permit $350 - $1000 per day Processed by Police Commercial and Private Photography and Filming
inside Historic Buildings4 $50.00 per hour, minimum of 4 hours Fees for document delivery, color internet prints, &
duplication of California History Room photos and
other archival materials. Call Library for fee Call Library for fee LIBRARY & MUSEUMS1,2

LIBRARY

MUSEUMS
1 The Library and Museums Director is authorized to set fees for Museum activities, programs and services, subject to the following standards:

1. Museum programs and services shall benefit both the participant and the community due to their educational and cultural value; 2. Museum and services require facilities, supplies, equipment, and/or considerable staff planning and supervision specific to the program and therefore, it is appropriate to charge a fee for these programs and services. Some examples include, but are not limited to instructional programs, special events, and educational tours; 3. Fees will not exceed the reasonable cost to the City of providing the program, class, or service.; 4. Fees will remain affordable to allow access to community members, especially youth and seniors; and; 5.

Contractually taught class fees will be set based on availability of instructor, instructor costs, as these programs follow city purchasing policy. 2 The Library and Museums Director may approve promotional pricing for Museum activities, programs, and services, subject to the following standards: 1. The fee reduction must be intended to promote Museum programs and facilities; 2. The fee reduction shall not reduce fees by more than 25%;; 3. The fee reduction is publicized and open to all; and 4. The fee reduction is limited in duration. 3 Each additional person is $15, for a maximum of 15 people per tour for Pacific Biological Laboratories and Presidio of Monterey Museum, 30 people maximum for the Colton Hall Museum. Monterey residents will receive a 10% discount.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 19, Packet Page 73 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
LIBRARY & MUSEUMS1,2
4Commercial filming also requires a film permit through the City of Monterey. Hourly cost for staff monitor of City facilities.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 20, Packet Page 74 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE
FY26 NON-PROFIT
FEE FY25 FEE
FY25 NON-PROFIT
FEE
Room
Serra I $5,290.00 $4,230.00 $5,290.00 $4,230.00
Serra II $4,365.00 $3,490.00 $4,365.00 $3,490.00
Serra I, II $9,655.00 $7,720.00 $9,655.00 $7,720.00
Serra Lobby $1,305.00 $1,045.00 $1,305.00 $1,045.00
Steinbeck I $1,695.00 $1,355.00 $1,695.00 $1,355.00
Steinbeck II $1,370.00 $1,095.00 $1,370.00 $1,095.00
Steinbeck III $1,695.00 $1,355.00 $1,695.00 $1,355.00
Steinbeck I, II, III $4,760.00 $3,805.00 $4,760.00 $3,805.00 Steinbeck I - A $1,030.00 $825.00 $1,030.00 $825.00
Steinbeck I - B $1,030.00 $825.00 $1,030.00 $825.00
Steinbeck I - C $1,030.00 $825.00 $1,030.00 $825.00
Steinbeck Lobby $1,030.00 $825.00 $1,030.00 $825.00
Colton I, II or III $600.00 $480.00 $600.00 $480.00
Colton I, II & III $1,800.00 $1,440.00 $1,800.00 $1,440.00 Jeffers Plaza $1,720.00 $1,375.00 $1,720.00 $1,375.00
Stevenson I $730.00 $585.00 $730.00 $585.00
Stevenson II $730.00 $585.00 $730.00 $585.00
Stevenson Terrace $1,440.00 $1,150.00 $1,440.00 $1,150.00 Delmonte Terrace $1,305.00 $1,045.00 $1,305.00 $1,045.00 Notes regarding MCC fees:

4. Rates are rounded off to the nearest $5.

5. Rates are on a fiscal basis July 1 through June 30.
*Subject to 2.9% Service Fee.

MONTEREY CONFERENCE CENTER*

1. Published Rates: from $0.38/sq foot for Ballrooms to $1.09/square foot for Stevenson Rooms.

2. Non-Profit Rates: 20% off published rates for Monterey County 501 (c)(3) Organizations.

3. Future rates beyond FY22 increase between 3-5% annually, not to exceed 5%.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 21, Packet Page 75 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Equipment
5x7 Lined pad w/pen or pencil $26.00/dozen $26.00/dozen Table $18.00 $18.00
Table w/linen only $23.00 $23.00
Table w/linen & skirt $30.00 $30.00
Linen - refresh $6.00 $6.00
Skirt - refresh $38.00 (cost to dry clean) $38.00 (cost to dry clean) Podium $30.00 $30.00
Dance Floor/15x15 or larger $350.00 per event $350.00 per event Dance Floor/15x15 or smaller $150.00 per event $150.00 per event Pipe & Drape (2 bases) $20.00 $20.00
Stanchion (2 bases) $10.00 per section $10.00 per section Chair, banquet $5.00 $5.00
Talk show style Table $75.00/day $75.00/day
Talk show style Chair $75.00/day $75.00/day
Barstool $15.00 $15.00
Coatrack $30.00 $30.00
Outdoor Heater $45.00 $45.00
Water Dispenser $45.00 $45.00
5 gal Water refills $25.00 $25.00
Services
Labor Fees
Including but not limited to: removing decorations,
additional room refreshes, airwall open/close, room
turns or damage repairs $50.00/hr per person $50.00/hr per person Pallet Disposal-If Pallets are left and not taken by
vendor $300.00/Pallet $300.00/Pallet
Room Turns

MONTEREY CONFERENCE CENTER
Daily Equipment & Service Fees*

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 22, Packet Page 76 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE

MONTEREY CONFERENCE CENTER
Daily Equipment & Service Fees*
Steinbeck Ia, Ib, Ic $50.00/section $50.00/section
Steinbeck II, III $150.00 per section $150.00 per section Colton $50.00 per section $50.00 per section
Serra I $450.00 minimum $450.00 minimum
Serra II (Based On Setup Requirements) $400.00 minimum $400.00 minimum Serra Carpet Replacement $125.00 per 3x3 section + labor $125.00 per 3x3 section + labor Re-Key Lock + (1) Key $75.00 $75.00
Additional Keys $25.00 each $25.00 each
Unreturned Keys $25.00 each $25.00 each
Banner installation $50.00 each $50.00 each
Shipment per cardboard box
$25.00/day to store
(5 boxes for the RENTER is complimentary with receipt
no earlier than 2 days prior to move in)
$25.00/day to store
(5 boxes for the RENTER is complimentary with receipt
no earlier than 2 days prior to move in)
Shipment, oversized $110.00/day to store $110.00/day to store Analog Lines
Heavy Equipment Day = 8 hours Day = 8 hours
Scissor Lift $75.00/hr or $500.00/day $75.00/hr or $500.00/day Powered Pallet Jack $30.00/hr or $150.00/day $30.00/hr or $150.00/day Non-Powered Pallet Jack $25.00/hr or $125.00/day $25.00/hr or $125.00/day Office Supplies/Services**
Office Services/Supplies Cost + 25% ($5.00 minimum) Cost + 25% ($5.00 minimum) 25% will be added to all outside services added to MCC
Final bill
Customized Display Moniter 25" $25.00 $25.00
Customized Display Moniter 65" $100.00 $100.00
*Subject to 2.9% Service Fee.
**25% will be added to all outside services added to MCC Final bill

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 23, Packet Page 77 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Cannery Row Garage $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr West Custom House Garage $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr East Custom House Garage $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr Waterfront Lot $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr Wharf II $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr Red Wharf Permits - $150.00/qtr Permits - $150.00/qtr
Depot Lot Figueroa / Del Monte $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr Upper 7 $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr Lot #4 Franklin / Van Buren $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr Lot #6 Wharf $162.50/mo, $480.00/qtr, $1,728.00/yr $162.50/mo, $480.00/qtr, $1,728.00/yr Lot #8 Franklin / Pierce $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr Lot #11 Franklin / Pierce $82.50/mo, $240.00/qtr, $864.00/yr $82.50/mo, $240.00/qtr, $864.00/yr Lot #14 Bonifacio / Adams $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr Lot #18 Van Buren / Jefferson $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr Lot #21 Foam / Cannery Row $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr $52.50/mo, $150.00/qtr, $540.00/yr Lot B Calle Principal / Pearl $82.50/mo, $240.00/qtr, $864.00/yr $82.50/mo, $240.00/qtr, $864.00/yr New Monterey Employee Permit Permits - $32.50/mo, $90.00/qtr Permits - $32.50/mo, $90.00/qtr Monterey Resident Discount Decal
$20.00/yr
2 hours free in Downtown Garages (West and East),
Waterfront Lot and Cannery Row Garage
$20.00/yr
2 hours free in Downtown Garages (West and East),
Waterfront Lot and Cannery Row Garage
Employee Voucher Parking Program
Cannery Row & Downtown Garages
20 entries - $50.00
Valid in Downtown Garages (East and West)
and Cannery Row Garage
20 entries - $50.00
Valid in Downtown Garages (East and West)
and Cannery Row Garage
Construction Daily Permit
$15.00 Downtown
$25.00 Waterfront / Cannery Row
$15.00 Downtown
$25.00 Waterfront / Cannery Row
Reserved Parking (Citywide) space per day $25.00/space per day $25.00/space per day Reserved Parking (Citywide) space for display $55.00/space for display $55.00/space for display Notes Regarding Parking Fees:

8. Effective 01/01/09, the monthly charge for a net storage in the Depot Lot shall be $50/space.

PARKING - PERMIT FEES

1. A refundable $5.00 deposit for the permit entry card and card programming will be required in addition to the permit fee. Please note, if payment is received after the grace period, a reactivation fee of $5.00 per permit will be charged.

2. Wharf II permits shall only be issued to those who have boats at A or H Tier and must be verified with the Harbormaster.

3. Permit fees are non-refundable. If you desire to change your billing option, it will become effective the following quarter. You may not switch billing options during the quarter.

4. A replacement fee of $10 per permit will be charged for lost or stolen paper permits.

5. Grace periods: Monthly Permits - 2 days, Quarterly Permits - 5 days, Annual Permits - 10 days

11. The City Manager or their designee shall have the authority to negotiate and set fees for any City parking facility for special events or functions.

6. Permit Pro-rate Information: Monthly - on the 15th of each month, Quarterly - on the 1st and 15th of each month, Annual - None.

7. Monterey Residents may purchase a decal for $20/year that will allow them two hour parking in the Downtown Garages, Cannery Row Garage and the Waterfront Lot.

9. Boot Removal Fee is $75.00.

10. The City Manager or their designee shall have the authority to set a flat parking rate in any attendant parking facility up to the approved maximum daily rate for said facility.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 24, Packet Page 78 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE1
FY26
RESIDENT** FY25 FEE1
FY25
RESIDENT**
Ground Burials for Caskets
a. Infant Burial Site $1,893.50 $1,932.00 $1,824.00 $1,861.50 b. Adult Burial Site - Single Depth $5,964.00 $5,069.50 $5,745.50 $4,884.00 Niche Inurnment
a. Niche- Single Lakeside Columbarium $3,255.00 $2,788.50 $3,136.00 $2,686.50 b. Niche - Double Lakeside and Old Columbarium $6,176.00 $5,250.00 $5,950.00 $5,058.00 Ground Burial for Urns
a. Full Burial Site (1-8 urns) $5,964.00 $5,069.50 $5,745.50 $4,884.00 b. Half Burial Site (1-4 urns) $2,876.50 $2,445.00 $2,771.00 $2,355.50 c. Quarter Burial Site (1-2 urns only) $1,893.50 $1,609.50 $1,824.00 $1,550.50 d. Cremains Added Plot (2nd, 3rd right etc. of Inurnment) $786.00 $757.00 Ossuary- Scattering Garden (shared burial site)
a. Remains added to shared burial site- remains not retrievable $337.50 $287.00 $325.00 $276.50 b. Fetal remains $56.50 $48.50 $54.50 $46.50
Indenture/Administrative Fee
a. Indenture – Burial Site $258.50 $249.00
b. Indenture - Niche $258.50 $249.00
c. Indenture Transfer fee $309.50 $298.00
d. Deed Replacement $97.00 $93.50
e. Ossuary Administrative Fee $33.50 $32.50
Endowment Care
a. Infant Burial Site $772.50 $744.00
b. Half Burial Site $1,417.50 $1,365.50
c. Quarter Burial Site (1-2 urns only) $696.50 $671.00
d. Burial Site – Single Depth $2,187.50 $2,107.50
f. Niche- Single $1,029.00 $991.50
g. Niche- Double $1,287.00 $1,240.00
h. Ossuary (Scattering Garden) $84.50 $81.50
Internment/Inurnment – Labor Charges
a. Infant Cremains $675.50 $651.00
b. Adult Cremains $786.00 $757.00
c. Infant Casket Burial $898.50 $865.50
d. Child Casket Burial $1,010.50 $973.50
e. Child Burial (adult sized casket) $1,965.00 $1,893.00 f. Adult Burial – Single Depth $1,965.00 $1,893.00
g. Adult Burial – Double Depth $2,133.00 $2,055.00
h. Niche- Lakeside Columbarium Inurnment $618.00 $595.50 i. Niche- Old Columbarium Inurnment $757.50 $730.00
a. Infant Burial $786.00 $757.00
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT - CEMETERY FEES1,2*
Internment/Inurnment - Weekends/Holidays – Labor Charges – Additional Fee

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 25, Packet Page 79 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE1
FY26
RESIDENT** FY25 FEE1
FY25
RESIDENT**
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT - CEMETERY FEES1,2*
b. Cremation Burial $618.00 $595.50
c. Niche – Columbarium Inurnment $618.00 $595.50
d. Adult Burial – Single Depth $1,010.50 $973.50
Disinterment – Labor Charges
a. Infant Cremains $561.50 $541.00
b. Adult Cremains $786.00 $757.00
c. Infant/Child Casket Burial $2,470.00 $2,379.50
d. Child Casket Burial (adult sized casket) $3,929.50 $3,785.50 e. Adult Burial – Single Depth $3,929.50 $3,785.50
f. Adult Burial – Double Depth $4,715.00 $4,542.50
g. Dis-inurnment Niche - Single/face plate disposal/replace $954.50 $919.50 h. Dis-inurnment Niche - Double/ face plate disposal/replace $1,179.00 $1,136.00 Memorial Marker Placement - Cement Border
a. 8X16x3 inch $204.50 $197.00
b. 12X24x3 inch $484.50 $467.00
c. 16x28x3 inch $603.50 $581.50
Memorial Marker Placement – No Cement Border
a. 8X16x3 inch $161.50 $155.50
b. 12X24x3 inch $296.50 $285.50
c. 16X28x3 inch $377.50 $363.50
Other Services
a. Niche Engraving - Single Niche – per character $11.50 $11.00 b. Minimum Niche Engraving Fee (Death Date) $181.00 $174.50 c. Niche Layout - Administrative Fee - Premium $86.00 $83.00 d. Flower Vase Drilling $22.00 $21.00
e. Paint Inscriptions $216.00 $208.00
f. Remove Marker/Dispose $278.00 $268.00 1
Fees shall be adjusted annually in July based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The CPI increase shall be based on the published CPI for San Francisco Area (San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose) April edition and rounded to the nearest fifty cents (0.50).
*Effective Jan. 1, 2024 all credit card transactions will be subject to a 2.9% surcharge paid directly to the bank **To be eligible for the resident rate, the purchaser or deceased must be a resident of the City of Monterey as of the date of purchase or death or for eligible employees who have access to residents rates per Memorandum of Understanding. Proof of residency, such as a driver’s license or utility bill we be required. 2 Revised July 2024 to be in alignment with resolutions passed off cycle by Council in August, 2022

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 26, Packet Page 80 DESCRIPTION FY 26 FEE FY 25 FEE
Downtown:

Lot 7, Calle Principal Garage Lower $1.50/hour, $8.00 all day $1.50/hour, $8.00 all day Lot 7, Calle Principal Garage Upper $1.50/hour, $8.00 all day $1.50/hour, $8.00 all day Downtown West Garage
1st hour free, $1.00/30 min or fraction thereof.
$12.00 daily max
1st hour free, $1.00/30 min or fraction thereof.
$12.00 daily max
Downtown East Garage
1st hour free, $1.00/30 min or fraction thereof.
$12.00 daily max
1st hour free, $1.00/30 min or fraction thereof.
$12.00 daily max
Monterey Sports Center Lot3,4 No Fee, 2-hour time limit No Fee, 2-hour time limit Lot 4, Franklin & Van Buren $1.50/hour $8.00 all day $1.50/hour $8.00 all day Lot 8, Franklin & Pierce $1.50/hour $1.50/hour
Lot B, Calle P. & Pearl permit only permit only
Lot 11, Calle P. and Pearl $1.50/hour, $8.00 all day $1.50/hour, $8.00 all day Lot 14, Bonifacio & Adams $1.50/hour, $8.00 all day $1.50/hour, $8.00 all day Lot 18, Van Buren & Jefferson permit only permit only
Cannery Row:

Meters, Cannery Row (Zone 1) $2.00/hour $1.75/hour
Meters, Wave (Zone 2) $2.00/hour $2.00/hour
Meters, Foam (Zone 3) $1.75/hour $1.75/hour
CR1, Foam & Hoffman
Flat rate pricing or hourly rate structure based on
demand and season. $5.00 - $22.00 daily max
Flat rate pricing or hourly rate structure based on
demand and season. $5.00 - $20.00 daily max
CR7, Foam & Irving $20/daily max, $5 after 5pm $20/daily max, $5 after 5pm Lot 24, C.R. & Foam - Meters (Zone 3) $1.75/hour $1.75/hour Lot 21, C.R. & Foam2
$2.00/hour, $14 daily max
Double space $2.50/hour, $22 daily max
$1.75/hour, $12.00 daily max
Double space $2.25/hour, $19.00 daily max
San Carlos Beach Lot $2.00/hour, $14 daily max $1.75/hour, $12.00 daily max Coast Guard Pier (Breakwater)2
$2.00/hour, $14 daily max
Double space $2.50/hour, $22 daily max
$1.75/hour, $12 daily max
Double space $2.25/hour, $19 daily max
Waterfront:

Waterfront Lot 1 2,4
$2.00/hour, $14 daily max
Double space $2.50/hour, $22 daily max
$1.75/hour, $12 daily max
Double space $2.25/hour, $19 daily max
Marina Lot
Combined into Waterfront Lot 1 with completion of
Phase2 of Waterfront Area Improvement Project
Combined into Waterfront Lot 1 with completion of
Phase2 of Waterfront Area Improvement Project
Depot Lot , Figueroa2
$2.00/hour, $14 daily max
Double space $2.50/hour, $22 daily max
$1.75/hour, $12 daily max
Double space $2.25/hour, $19 daily max
Municipal Wharf II $2.00/hour, $14 daily max $1.75/hour, $12 daily max Lot 6, Waterfront no fee, loading/unloading zone only no fee, loading/unloading zone only Southern Pacific (SP) Lot
Combined into Waterfront Lot 1 with completion of
Phase2 of Waterfront Area Improvement Project
Combined into Waterfront Lot 1 with completion of
Phase2 of Waterfront Area Improvement Project
East Depot Lot/Gravel side2
$2.00/hour, $14 daily max
Double space $2.50/hour, $22 daily max
$1.75/hour, $12 daily max
Double space $2.25/hour, $19 daily max
Monterey Bay Park (MB7)2
$2.00/hour, $14 daily max
Double space $2.50/hour, $22 daily max
$1.75/hour, $12 daily max
Double space $2.25/hour, $19 daily max
Electric Vehicle Charging Rates:

Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging, PER KWH $0.36 $0.36
Idle Fee After Designated Grace Period, PER MINUTE $0.50 $0.50 Administrative Fee $15.00
Notes Regarding Parking Rates:

PARKING - RATES1

1. Rates in off-street pay-to-park facilities apply to all patrons who use these facilities, including disabled persons and disabled veterans.

2. Double Space Rates apply to Oversized Vehicles taking more than a single parking space including Buses, RVs, Trailers and Vehicles longer than 20ft in length.

3. Sport Center Lot Pay Stations removed April 14, 2023. Sports Center Lot converted from paid parking to no fee parking, 2hour time limit.

5. Phase 2 of the Waterfront Area Improvement Project integrated previoulsy recongized Marina Lot and Southern (SP) Lot into the area now recognized as Waterfront Lot 1 as of February 2023. Project completed October 2023.

4. Discounted Validations offered to Sports Center Patrons. $1.00 for 3-hours in the Downtown Garages. Validations sold at the Sports Center Front Desk.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 27, Packet Page 81 DESCRIPTION FY26 Program Fee FY26 Monterey
Resident Fee FY25 Program Fee FY25 Monterey Resident Fee Permits/Facility Rentals

1. Group Picnic Permit $90.00 $81.00 $90.00 $81.00

2. El Estero Park Group Picnic Permit $120.00 $108.00 $120.00 $108.00

3. Veteran's Memorial Park Group Area 2 Picnic Permit $120.00 $108.00 $120.00 $108.00

4. Group Beach Permit $90.00 $81.00 $90.00 $81.00

5. Group Beach Permit/Commercial $230.00 $230.00 $230.00 $230.00

6. Beach Wedding Permit $650.00 $650.00 $650.00 $650.00

7. Beach/Park Annual Use Permit For Small Group Activities Incl. Picnics/Teambuilding/Instructional
Classes/Camps/Fitness
Or Athletic Training (groups of 15 or less)- Commercial $850.00 $765.00 $850.00 $765.00

8. Beach/Park Annual Use Permit For Small Group Activities Incl. Picnics/Teambuilding/Instructional
Classes/Camps/Fitness
Or Athletic Training (groups of 15 or less)- Nonprofit $270.00 $270.00 $270.00 $270.00

9. Sport Court Permit
(eg., Volleyball, Basketball, Tennis) - PER DAY $70.00 $63.00 $70.00 $63.00

10. Bounce House/Inflatable Permit $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 $55.00

11. Wedding Event Permit - Colton Hall Lawn
Or Friendly Plaza - Per Location $230.00 $207.00 $230.00 $207.00

12. Event Permit (Per Day) $650.00 $650.00 $650.00 $650.00

13. Event/Park Closure Permit (Per Day) $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00

14. Meeting Room Use - Nonprofit (During Community Center Operating Hours) - Per Hour Fee $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00

15. Meeting Room Use - Nonprofit (During Community Center Non-Operating Hours) - Per Hour Fee w/ 2 Hour Minimum $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00

16. Facility Rental – Community Centers Private Party Use - Per Hour Fee w/ 2 Hour Minimum $160.00 $144.00 $160.00 $144.00

17. Waterfront Community Room Rental Permit - Nonprofit - Per Hour Fee $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 $80.00

18. Ballpark Event Permit
Day Use $650.00 $650.00 $650.00 $650.00
Hourly Use $65.00 $65.00 $65.00 $65.00
Lights Use - Per Hour Fee $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00

19. Ballpark Use Fee Practice -
Per Hour Fee w/ 2 Hour Minimum $30.00 $27.00 $30.00 $27.00

20. Parks & Recreation Commission
Appeal Process $179.00 $179.00 $179.00 $179.00

21. Monterey Sports Center
Drop-In Admission:

Youth (3-12 Years) $11.00 $10.00 $11.00 $10.00
Teen (13-17 Years) $12.00 $11.00 $12.00 $11.00
Adult (18-61 Years) $16.00 $15.00 $16.00 $15.00
Senior (62 And Older) $11.00 $10.00 $11.00 $10.00
10-Visit Pass:

Youth (3-12 Years) $110.00 $100.00 $110.00 $100.00
Teen (13-17 Years) $120.00 $110.00 $120.00 $110.00
Adult (18-61 Years) $160.00 $150.00 $160.00 $150.00
Senior (62 And Older) $110.00 $100.00 $110.00 $100.00
Subscription/Auto Billing (1 Month):

Youth (9-12 Years) $38.00 $34.20 $38.00 $34.20
Teen (13-17 Years) $42.00 $37.80 $42.00 $37.80
Adult (18-61 Years) $68.00 $61.20 $68.00 $61.20

PARKS & RECREATION

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 28, Packet Page 82 DESCRIPTION FY26 Program Fee FY26 Monterey
Resident Fee FY25 Program Fee FY25 Monterey Resident Fee

PARKS & RECREATION
Senior (62 And Older) $50.00 $45.00 $50.00 $45.00
Family* $100.00 $90.00 $100.00 $90.00
Membership (1 Year):

Youth (9-12 Years) $410.00 $369.00 $410.00 $369.00
Teen (13-17 Years) $470.00 $423.00 $470.00 $423.00
Adult (18-61 Years) $750.00 $675.00 $750.00 $675.00
Senior (62 And Older) $550.00 $495.00 $550.00 $495.00
Family* $1,100.00 $990.00 $1,100.00 $990.00
* Family Membership Eligibility - 2 adults and their dependent children 20 years of age and younger that live in the same household.

Business/Corporate Fee:

Membership (1 Year) $624.00 $624.00 $624.00 $624.00
Membership (Monthly) $52.00 $52.00 $52.00 $52.00
Facility Rental (Staff Time Additional)
During Non-Operating Hours:

Pool - First 2 Hours $340.00 $306.00 $340.00 $306.00
Additional Hour $150.00 $135.00 $150.00 $135.00
Gym - First 2 Hours $340.00 $306.00 $340.00 $306.00
Additional Hour $150.00 $135.00 $150.00 $135.00
Pool & Gym - First 2 Hours $520.00 $468.00 $520.00 $468.00 Additional Hour $250.00 $225.00 $250.00 $225.00
During Operating Hours:

Pool Lane Rental - Per Hour Fee $25.00 $22.50 $25.00 $22.50 Gymnasium Court Rental- Per Hour Fee $50.00 $45.00 $50.00 $45.00 Studio Rental- Per Hour Fee $100.00 $90.00 $100.00 $90.00 Conference Room Rental- Per Hour Fee $30.00 $27.00 $30.00 $27.00

22. Veteran's Memorial Park Campground:

Campsite With 1 Vehicle $47.00 $47.00 $47.00 $47.00
Additional Vehicle $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00
Each Bicycle - Hiker Campsite $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 Overnight Youth Group Area - Per Person Fee
Overnight Youth Group Area 3 - Per Person Fee $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 Overnight Youth Group Area 2 - Per Person Fee $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 Active Duty & Retired U.S. Military,
Disabled U.S. Veterans & Senior Age 62
And Older - (Vehicle Campsite)3 $5.00 Discount $5.00 Discount $5.00 Discount $5.00 Discount Active Duty & Retired U.S. Military,
Disabled U.S. Veteran & Senior Age 62
And Older - (Hiker Campsite)3 $2.00 Discount $2.00 Discount $2.00 Discount $2.00 Discount Shower Fee For Non-Campers $4.00 $4.00 $4.00 $4.00
Dump Station Fee For Non-Campers - Per Use Fee $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 Recreational Vehicle Surcharge - Per Night Fee $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00 Veteran's Memorial Park Campground fees are rounded to the nearest whole dollar.

Urban Forestry
Non-Development Tree Permits:

Tree View Trimming Permit - City or Private Tree1 $132.00 $127.00 Tree Removal Permit Fee - Dead and Dying1 $0.00 $0.00
Tree Removal Permit Fee (Non-Development)1 $164.50 $158.50 Tree Removal Permit Appeal Fee (Non-Development)1 $234.50 $226.00 1 Fees will be annually adjusted per CPI (SF, April Edition) rounded to the nearest fifty cents.

Notes Regarding Parks & Recreation fees:
2 To be eligible for the resident rate, the purchaser must be a resident of the City of Monterey or United States Active Duty Military as of the date of registration or for eligible employee and dependents who have access to resident rates per Memoranda of Understanding. Proof of residency, such as a driver's license or state-issued identification, utility bill or U. S. Military active duty status such as military ID is required. 3 To be eligible for discounted camping rates at Veteran's Memorial Park, proof of age such as a driver's license or state-issued identification, or proof of United States Military active duty, retired or disabled veteran status is required.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 29, Packet Page 83 DESCRIPTION FY26 Program Fee FY26 Monterey
Resident Fee FY25 Program Fee FY25 Monterey Resident Fee

PARKS & RECREATION
4 The Parks and Recreation Director may approve promotional pricing for Recreation activities, programs, and services, subject to the following standards: 1. The fee reduction must be intended to promote Recreation programs and facilities;

2. The fee reduction shall not reduce fees by more than 25%; 3. The fee reduction is publicized and open to all; and 4. The fee reduction is limited in duration. 5 The Parks and Recreation Director is authorized to set fees for Recreation activities, programs and services, subject to the following standards: 1. Recreational programs and services shall benefit both the participant and the community due to their educational, cultural, and physical value. 2. Recreational programs and services require facilities, supplies, equipment, and/or considerable staff planning and supervision specific to the program and therefore, it is appropriate to charge a fee for these programs and services. Some examples include, but are not limited to instructional programs, summer day camp, senior programs, teen programs, special events, and youth/adult athletic programs. 3. Fees will not exceed the reasonable cost to the City of providing the program, class, or service. 4. Fees will remain affordable to allow access to community members, especially youth and seniors; and 5. Contractually taught class fees will be set based on availability of instructor, instructor costs, as these programs follow city purchasing policy. 6 Five percent (5%) of Parks & Recreation (P&R) Fees, which excludes P&R Commission Appeals, Cemetery, RV Storage Lot, and Urban Forestry fees, will be committed to the Facility Maintenance and Improvement Fund.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 30, Packet Page 84 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Special Events Stand-by (Fire) Fully Burdened Cost Fully Burdened Cost Engine Company Inspections (initial inspection) $0.00 $0.00 Engine Company Inspections - First re-inspection $0.00 $0.00 Engine Company Inspections - Subsequent re-inspections $90.00 $90.00 Fire Prevention Inspections - initial inspection, rough & final $0.00 $0.00 Fire Prevention Inspections - Subsequent re-inspections & missed inspections $174.00 $0.00
Fire Prevention Bureau Inspections - Second re-inspection DELETE $100.00 Fire Prevention Bureau Inspections - Third re-inspection DELETE $200.00 Fire Prevention Bureau Inspections - Fourth & each subsequent reinspection DELETE $500.00 Life and Safety Inspection - First and Second inspection $0.00 Life and Safety Inspection - Third & each subsequent re-inspection $524.00 State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Pre-Inspection Fee ≤25 occupants $174.00 $174.00
State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Pre-Inspection Fee ≥26 occupants $304.00 $304.00
State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Fire Clearance Fee 7 to 50 occupants $174.00 $174.00
State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Fire Clearance Fee >50 occupants $304.00 $304.00
State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Annual Inspection Fee 7 to 50 occupants $174.00 $174.00 State Mandated Community Care Facilities Inspections,
Annual Inspection Fee >50 occupants $304.00 $304.00
High Rise Inspection $1,010.00 $1,010.00
Annual Day Care Inspections (6 or more children) $76.00 $76.00 Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
First False Alarm $0.00 $0.00
PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE*

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 31, Packet Page 85 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE*
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
Second False Alarm DELETE $50.00
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
Third False Alarm DELETE $100.00
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
Fourth False Alarm DELETE $250.00
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
Fifth False Alarm DELETE $500.00
Fire False Alarm Response (for any 12 month period) -
Any Additional False Alarms1
Fully Burdened Cost/Not to
exceed $12,000 $500.00
Hazardous Materials Response Fully Burdened Cost Fully Burdened Cost DUI Incident Reimbursement1 Not to exceed $12,000 Not to exceed $12,000 Fire Hydrant Flow Tests $75.00 $75.00
CPR Heart Saver Class - cost per student $55.00 $55.00
CPR Heart Saver Skill Verification $33.00 $33.00
CPR Healthcare Provider Class (BLS) - cost per student $65.00 $65.00 CPR Healthcare Provier (BLS) Skill Verification $24.00 $24.00 CPR First Aid - cost per student $105.00 $105.00
CPR First Aid Skill Verification $45.00 $45.00
Fire Plan review and inspections, trade show set-up review $76.00 $76.00 Fire Plan review and inspections, Liquid Propane Gas installations $235.00 $235.00 Fire Plan review and inspections, Field Inspections Fully Burdened Cost Fully Burdened Cost Fire Plan review and inspections, Medical Gas $235.00 $235.00 Fire Plan review and inspections, Tent Installation
(400 - 1000 sq ft) $141.00 $141.00

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 32, Packet Page 86 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE*
Fire Plan review and inspections, Tent Installation
(1000 - 2000 sq ft) $206.00 $206.00
Fire Plan review and inspections, Tent Installation
(>2000 sq ft) $271.00 $271.00
Unauthorized Work Double Permit Fee Double Permit Fee
Unauthorized Occupancy $100.00 $100.00
Fire Department Review of Building Plans, Residential 10% of Building Plan Check Fee 10% of Building Plan Check Fee Fire Department Review of Building Plans, Commercial 20% of Building Plan Check Fee 20% of Building Plan Check Fee Project Consultation Fee Fully Burdened Cost Fully Burdened Cost Expedited Plan Checks Fully Burdened Cost Fully Burdened Cost Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Fire Alarm System (1-9 Devices) $235.00 $235.00 Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Fire Alarm System (10-50 Devices) $428.00 $428.00 Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Fire Alarm System (50+ Devices) $623.00 $623.00 Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Automatic Fire Sprinkler System 1- 180 Heads $428.00 + contractor cost $428.00 + contractor cost Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Automatic Fire Sprinkler System 180+ 181-360 Heads $622.00 + contractor cost $622.00 + contractor cost Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees-Automatic Fire Sprinkler System 361+ Heads $816 + contractor cost
Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees - Fixed Fire Protection System, other than Sprinklers (ie., spray booth, clean agent, hood system), new system
$623.00 $623.00
Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees - Fixed Fire Protection System, other than sprinklers (ie., spray booth, cleant agent, hood system) - alteration to existing system
$428.00 $428.00
Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees - Underground Systems (includes plan review, inspection, permit approval, system test flush) system test flush)
$816.00 $816.00

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 33, Packet Page 87 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
PUBLIC SAFETY - FIRE*
Fire Protection System Plan Check Fees - Emergency Responder Communciation Coverage System
$428 + contractor cost
Defensible Space Inspection $174.00 $174.00

1. Including but not limited to personnel, apparatus, vehicles, reports, booking. *Subject to 2.9% Service Fee

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 34, Packet Page 88 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Vehicle Equipment Inspection $34.00 $34.00
Animal Impound Fee - altered animal 1st visit $77.00 $77.00 Animal Impound Fee - non-altered animal 1st visit $87.00 $87.00 Animal Impound Fee - altered animal 2nd vist and thereafter $92.00 $92.00 Animal Impound Fee - non-altered animal 2nd visit and thereafter $102.00 $102.00 Animal Impound Fee - daily kennel fee $35.00 $35.00
Fingerprints - inked card $45.00 $45.00
LiveScan service only $48.00 $48.00
LiveScan prints - Local (includes DOJ fee)2 $80.00 $80.00 LiveScan prints - Local/Federal (includes DOJ & FBI fee)2 $97.00 $97.00 LiveScan prints - Child Care Provision (includes DOJ & CACI fee)2 $95.00 $95.00 Clearance Letter $35.00 $35.00
Taxicab Driver Permit $194.00 $194.00
Taxicab Vehicle Permit $56.00 $56.00
Taxicab Driver Transfer $58.00 $58.00
Massage Establishment - CAMTC Certified Owner(s) $259.00 $259.00 Massage Establishment - Non-CAMTC Certified Owner(s) $351.00 $351.00 Amended Massage Establishment Permit $27.00 $27.00
Amended Massage Establishment Permit with Livescan $92.00 $92.00 Local Background Checks $17.00 $17.00
Security Alarm Permit $29.00 $17.00
Police False Alarm Response - First false alarm $0.00 $0.00 Police False Alarm Response - Second false alarm $30.00 $30.00 Police False Alarm Response - Third false alarm $50.00 $50.00 Police False Alarm Response - Fourth false alarm $75.00 $75.00 Police False Alarm Response - Fifth false alarm $100.00 $100.00 Police False Alarm Response - Sixth false alarm and thereafter $500.00 $500.00 Police Party Disturbance Response - First response $0.00 $0.00 Police Party Disturbance Response - Second response $103.00 $103.00 Commercial Filming (daily)5 Delete $350.00
Vehicle Release $300.00 $300.00
Alcoholic Beverages on the Beach Permit (for 10 or fewer people) $10.00 $10.00 Officer Public Service Rate (hourly)4 Fully burdened $206.69 CSO Public Service Rate (hourly)4 Fully burdened $113.12 DUI Incident Reimbursement3 Not to exceed $12,000 Not to exceed $12,000 Dog License - monthly - unaltered dog $25.00 $25.00
Dog License - monthly - altered dog $15.00 $15.00
Dog License - 12 months - unaltered dog $54.00 $54.00
Dog License - 12 months - altered dog $20.00 $20.00
Dog License - 24 months - unaltered dog $67.00 $67.00
Dog License - 24 months - altered dog $30.00 $30.00
Dog License - 36 months - unaltered dog $87.00 $87.00
Dog License - 36 months - altered dog $40.00 $40.00
PUBLIC SAFETY - POLICE*

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 35, Packet Page 89 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
PUBLIC SAFETY - POLICE*
Senior Discount Dog License Fee - unaltered N/A N/A
Senior Discount Dog License Fee - altered $12.00 $12.00 Dog License - each additional month - unaltered dog DELETED IN FY 2024 DELETED IN FY 2024 Dog License - each additional month - altered dog DELETED IN FY 2024 DELETED IN FY 2024 Dog License - delinquent penalty $30.00 $30.00
Dog License - replacement tag $5.00 $5.00

5. Commercial Filming Fee is for permit only. Additional fees apply for additional services such as road closures, police presence and parking. *Subject to 2.9% Service Fee

1. Adjusts annually July 1 per CPI SF April edition, rounded to nearest $1.

2. Total fee comprised of service fee set by resolution ($33) and fees set by State DOJ and FBI.

3. Including but not limited to personnel, apparatus, vehicles, reports, booking.

4. Based on FY23 costs.

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 36, Packet Page 90 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Encroachment Permits
Street Opening Fee 1 $298.45 $287.53
Street Opening Fee with Sewer Connection 1 $603.37 $581.28 Temporary Encroachment Fee
(plus $96/hour if review outside PPW is required) 1 $228.42 $220.06 Permanent Encroachment Fee
(plus $91/hour for inspection)1 $298.45 $287.53
Driveway or Sidewalk Encroachment Fee1 $298.45 $287.53
Traffic Control Fee1 $150.84 $145.32
Public Improvement Inspection
3% of common area or
dedication improvements
3% of common area or
dedication improvements
PW Engineering
Grease Interceptor Waiver Fee
(360 days from City letter) $60.00/month $60.00/month
Final Subdivision Map Check1 $894.28 $861.54
Sewer Connection (Twin Oaks) $420.00/developable parcel $420.00/developable parcel Standard Specification $50.00/set $50.00/set
Street Patch Charge (asphalt only) $16.50/square foot $16.50/square foot Other $0.00 $0.00
Banner 1 $224.11 $215.90
Storm Water Review and Inspection Fee
(plus $99/hour)1 $391.11 $376.79
Storm Water - Developer Design Review1 $2,648.36 $2,551.40 Miscellaneous - Public Improvement Design Service
or Plan Check $111.00/hour $111.00/hour 1
Fee amount includes CPI adjustments, for applicable fees (SF, April). *Subject to 2.9% service fee.

PUBLIC WORKS
& ENGINEERING*

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 37, Packet Page 91 TIER BERTH SIZE LENGTH FY26 MONTHLY1 FY26 ANNUAL1 MONTHLY 1.5x1 ANNUAL 1.5X1 Monthly Transient1 $/ft length
Daily Transient
1 FY25 MONTHLY1 FY25 ANNUAL1 MONTHLY 1.5x1 ANNUAL 1.5X1 Monthly Transient1 $/ft length
Daily Transient
1 A 4, 6-8,10,12 50X19.5 50 619 6,682 928 10,022 1,277 45.61 604 6,525 906 9,787 1,247 44.54 A 9,11 45X19.5 45 571 6,166 857 9,249 1,145 40.89 558 6,022 837 9,033 1,118 39.94 A 13-18* 45X15.5 45 541 5,838 811 8,757 1,145 40.89 528 5,701 792 8,552 1,118 39.94 A 19-34 45X14.5 45 541 5,838 811 8,757 1,145 40.89 528 5,701 792 8,552 1,118 39.94 A 35-58 40X14.5 40 499 5,391 749 8,086 1,028 36.70 487 5,264 731 7,896 1,004 35.84 A 59-80* 35X13.5 35 460 4,966 690 7,449 895 31.98 449 4,850 674 7,274 874 31.23 A 81-82 35X14.5 35 460 4,966 690 7,449 895 31.98 449 4,850 674 7,274 874 31.23 B 1-36* 30X11.5 30 395 4,264 592 6,396 763 27.26 386 4,164 579 6,246 745 26.62 B 37-57 (odd) 35-12.5 35 431 4,655 646 6,982 895 31.98 421 4,546 631 6,818 874 31.23 B 38-58 (even) 30x12.5 30 410 4,428 615 6,642 763 27.26 400 4,324 601 6,486 745 26.62 B 59 35X13 35 460 4,966 690 7,449 895 31.98 449 4,850 674 7,274 874 31.23 B 60 30x13 30 410 4,428 615 6,642 763 27.26 400 4,324 601 6,486 745 26.62 C 1-4 25x11.9 25 335 3,618 503 5,427 646 23.07 327 3,533 491 5,300 631 22.53 C 5-40 25x10 25 326 3,522 489 5,283 646 23.07 318 3,440 478 5,159 631 22.53 D 1-36* 30X11.5 30 395 4,264 592 6,396 763 27.26 386 4,164 579 6,246 745 26.62 D 37-58 30X12.5 30 410 4,428 615 6,642 763 27.26 400 4,324 601 6,486 745 26.62 D 59-60 30X13 30 410 4,428 615 6,642 763 27.26 400 4,324 601 6,486 745 26.62 E 1-36 25x11.9 25 335 3,618 503 5,427 646 23.07 327 3,533 491 5,300 631 22.53 E 37-40 25X10.6 25 326 3,522 489 5,283 646 23.07 318 3,440 478 5,159 631 22.53 F 1-44 20X9.9 20 218 2,356 327 3,533 514 18.35 213 2,300 319 3,450 502 17.92 G 1* 26X11.5 26 357 3,856 536 5,784 661 23.59 349 3,766 523 5,648 645 23.04 G 2-18* 35X12.5 35 431 4,655 646 6,982 895 31.98 421 4,546 631 6,818 874 31.23 G 19-27 35X13 35 460 4,966 690 7,449 895 31.98 449 4,850 674 7,274 874 31.23 G 28 35X14.5 35 460 4,966 690 7,449 895 31.98 449 4,850 674 7,274 874 31.23 G 29 40 40 499 5,391 749 8,086 1,028 36.70 487 5,264 731 7,896 1,004 35.84 H 1-2 & 5 50X24 50 667 7,203 1,000 10,804 1,277 45.61 651 7,034 977 10,550 1,247 44.54 H 3-4 50X19.5 50 619 6,682 928 10,022 1,277 45.61 604 6,525 906 9,787 1,247 44.54 H 6-14* 50X17.5 50 598 6,455 897 9,683 1,277 45.61 584 6,304 876 9,456 1,247 44.54 H 15-24 50X15.5 50 571 6,166 857 9,249 1,277 45.61 558 6,022 837 9,033 1,247 44.54 H 25-34 25X10.6 25 326 3,522 489 5,283 646 23.07 318 3,440 478 5,159 631 22.53 I 1-10 20X9.9 20 218 2,356 327 3,533 514 18.35 213 2,300 319 3,450 502 17.92 I 11-14 Side-tie 20 194 2,095 291 3,143 514 18.35 189 2,046 284 3,069 502 17.92 END TIES > 0.91/ft
9 Transformer berths (6 feet shorter and charged at a lesser rate) A 17 39X15.5 39 469 5,062 703 7,593 998 35.65 458 4,943 687 7,415 975 34.82 A 61 28X13 28 373 4,032 560 6,047 719 25.69 365 3,937 547 5,906 702 25.09 B 1 & 31 24X11.5 24 313 3,381 470 5,071 617 22.02 306 3,301 459 4,952 602 21.50 D 1 & 31 24X11.5 24 313 3,381 470 5,071 617 22.02 306 3,301 459 4,952 602 21.50 G 15 28X12.5 28 344 3,715 516 5,572 719 25.69 336 3,628 504 5,441 702 25.09 H 13 44X17.5 44 536 5,787 804 8,680 1,130 40.37 523 5,651 785 8,477 1,104 39.42

DESCRIPTIONS AND FEES
HARBOR AND MARINA*
1 Licensee fee amounts include CPI adjustments per year end Feb SF. *Subject to 2.9% Service Fee
fishing vessel rate $/ft: 1
Non-standard berth -
FY 2025-26 FY 2024-25

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 38, Packet Page 92 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE - UPDATED 5/28

MONTEREY OUTER HARBOR MOORING RATES
Monterey Resident Rate1
Quarterly $274.50 $268.00
Annual (with 10% discount) $987.00 $964.00
Liveaboard quarterly $99.00 $96.50
Liveaboard annually (with 10% discount) $355.00 $346.50 Non-Resident Rate1
Quarterly $346.00 $338.00
Annual (with 10% discount) $1,246.00 $1,217.00
OHM Assignment Fee per Quarter1 $259.50 $84.50
Other Services1
Qrt Wharf 1 Dinghy fee $93.00 $91.00
Qrt Marina Dinghy fee $156.00 $152.50
Qrt Marina Boat Rack (kayaks) $62.50 $61.00
Qrt Marina Boat Rack (skiff) Dinghy fee $93.00 $91.00
City Mooring Rate1
Monthly $158.50 $155.00
East Mooring Rates1
Vessel Size
Under 30 ft $148.00 $144.50
30' to 40' $196.00 $191.50
East Mooring Rates from Nov through March = 1.5 times regular berth rate Transient Mooring - East Mooring Balls $15.00/day $15.00/day OTHER
Marina Storage Fee 1.5 x Transient berth rate 1.5 x Transient berth rate Disabled Vessel Towing, PER HOUR or portion thereof
1 $237.50 $232.00
Water Removal (charged only if owner is notified and
fails to respond), PER HOUR or portion thereof 1 $68.00 $66.50 Mooring Repair Rate (Forced), PER HOUR or portion
thereof 1 $266.00 $260.00
Deposits - Refundable
Electrical Pigtails
20/30 amp $105.00 $102.50
50 amp $210.00 $205.00
Marina Shower, Restroom, Gate, Hoist Keys $21.00 $20.50 Annual Parking Permit - Marina Berth License Holder,
PER CALENDAR YEAR 1 $133.00 $130.00
Bike Locker Rental, PER MONTH 1 $12.00 $11.50
Mailbox (Liveaboard) - Annual Fee 1, 5 $50.00
Public Hoist on Wharf II, PER 15 MINUTES 1 $6.00 $6.00
Mooring Inspection Fee (Forced) 1 $133.00 $130.00
Yellow Boat Dock, PER MONTH (Dive Boat Loading
and Sailing Charters) 1, 4 $166.00 $162.00
Berth Assignment Rate 1 1.5x Regular berth rate 1.5x Regular berth rate Waiting List - Initial Fee1 $26.50 $26.00
Waiting List - Annual Fee1 $10.00 $10.00
K Tier Side-tie Transient (no utilities, rafting required) $0.00 $0.00 28' & Under, PER DAY1 $13.50 $13.00
29' & Up, PER DAY1 $19.50 $19.00
Wharf I Transient Vessel1
PER FOOT PER DAY $0.91
Wharf II Transient Vessel1 (no utilities)
51' - 70', PER DAY $33.50 $32.50
71' - 90', PER DAY $39.00 $38.00
91' & over, PER DAY $44.00 $43.00
Wharfage
High Volume Seafood (Trawl-caught ground fish, squid,
mackerels, sardines) $/TON2 $8.29 $8.10
High Volume Seafood (Anchovies) $/TON2 $4.16 $4.07
All Other Seafood/Sea Products Harvested by Pot,
Trap, Hooks, or By Hand (includes crustaceans and
invertebrates) $/POUND3 $0.028 $0.027
Aguaculture Abalone (Less than 4" in length) $/EACH 3 $0.070 $0.068 Aguaculture Abalone (4" or larger in length) $/EACH3 $0.138 $0.135 1 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF, rounded to the nearest 50 cents.

PUBLIC WORKS - HARBOR & MARINA *

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 39, Packet Page 93 DESCRIPTION FY26 FEE FY25 FEE - UPDATED 5/28
PUBLIC WORKS - HARBOR & MARINA *
2 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF, no rounding. 3 Fees include CPI adjustment per year end Feb SF, rounded to the nearest thousandth 4 A per-use charge of $41.50 applies for up to four uses, with a maximum monthly charge not to exceed $166. 5 Previously not included in the fee schedule. Recommend raising to market rate in the future. *Subject to 2.9% Service Fee

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 40, Packet Page 94 DESCRIPTION UNITS FY26 FEE FY25 FEE
Category
Residential Sewer Charge1 $16.93 $14.11
Multi-Residential/Condo Sewer Charge1 $12.38 $10.32
Sewer Connection Fee2 Dwelling Unit $3,617 $3,641
Non-residential Sewer Charges 1
(per one unit of sewer charge)
Business/Government (1-10 employees) Location/Each Business $13.03 $10.86 Business/Government (11-20 employees) Location/Each Business $26.08 $21.73 Business/Government (21-30 employees) Location/Each Business $39.29 $32.74 Business/Government (31-40 employees) Location/Each Business $52.32 $43.60 Business/Government (41-50 employees) Location/Each Business $65.35 $54.46 Business/Government (51-60 employees) Location/Each Business $78.40 $65.33 Business/Government (61-70 employees) Location/Each Business $91.60 $76.33 Business/Government (71-80 employees) Location/Each Business $104.63 $87.19 Business/Government (81-90 employees) Location/Each Business $117.66 $98.05 Business/Government (91-100 employees) Location/Each Business $130.69 $108.91 Business/Government (101-110 employees) Location/Each Business $143.92 $119.93 Business/Government (111-120 employees) Location/Each Business $156.95 $130.79 Business/Government (141-150 employees) Location/Each Business $196.21 $163.51 Business/Government (171-180 employees) Location/Each Business $235.33 $196.11 Business/Government (181-190 employees) Location/Each Business $248.53 $207.11 Business/Government (210-220 employees) Location/Each Business $287.64 $239.70 Business/Government (271-280 employees) Location/Each Business $365.52 $304.60 Business/Government (721-730 employees) Location/Each Business $954.71 $795.59 Hotel/Motel Each Room $7.28 $6.07
Supermarket Each Location $71.45 $59.54
Medical Office Each Licensed Physician $17.44 $14.53
Dental Office Each Licensed Dentist $24.04 $20.03
Rest Home/Convalescent Each Bed of Licensed Capacity $4.91 $4.09 Animal Hospital Location/Each Licensed Business $32.68 $27.23 Restaurant - 1 Meal/day Each Restaurant Seat $0.67 $0.56 Restaurant - 2 Meals/day Each Restaurant Seat $1.02 $0.85 Restaurant - 3 Meals/day Each Restaurant Seat $1.86 $1.55 Restaurant with Bar Each Restaurant Seat $1.86 $1.55
Bar Location/Each Business $28.44 $23.70
Night Club Location/Each Business $85.15 $70.96
Take-Out Small Location/Each Business $31.66 $26.38
Take-Out Medium Location/Each Business $78.05 $65.04

PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 41, Packet Page 95 DESCRIPTION UNITS FY26 FEE FY25 FEE

PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
Take-Out Large Location/Each Business $142.22 $118.52
Bakery Location/Each Business $25.73 $21.44
Theatre Per screen @ each Location $42.16 $35.13
Non-residential Sewer Charges1
(per one unit of sewer charge) cont'd
Gym - 500 Members Location/Each Business $13.03 $10.86
Mortuary Location/Each Business $34.70 $28.92
School - Minimum Location/Each Business $13.03 $10.86
School - Pre-Grade 6 School Population $0.17 $0.14
School - Grade 7 - College School Population $0.35 $0.29 School - Boarding School Population $3.55 $2.96
Instructional Facility School Population $13.03 $10.86
Church - 1-100 Members Location/Each Business $13.03 $10.86 Church - Over 100 Members Location/Each Business $26.08 $21.73 Photo Developer Location/Each Business $13.03 $10.86
Laboratory - 10 Employees Location/Each Business $13.03 $10.86 Laboratory - 20 Employees Location/Each Business $26.08 $21.73 Printer - 10 Employees Location/Each Business $13.03 $10.86 Printer - 20 Employees Location/Each Business $26.08 $21.73 Garage/Repair Location/Each Business $12.53 $10.44
Paint Shop - 10 Employees Location/Each Business $13.03 $10.86 Paint Shop - 20 Employees Location/Each Business $26.08 $21.73 Dry Cleaner Location/Each Business $43.34 $36.12
Laundromat Each Washing Machine $11.35 $9.46
*Subject to 2.9% Service Fee
1 All sewer charge rates per City Council Resolution No. 24-096. Sewer Connection Fee per City Council Resolution No. 11-113. 2 Annual increases effective July 1 each year, per Construction Cost Index (MRWPCA ordinance for Dec).

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 42, Packet Page 96 Council
Agenda Report
№10/24
FROM: Andrea Renny, PE, PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Megan Beckman, Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: Conduct Council Field Trip to the Central Public Safety Facility (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council conduct and attend a public field trip at the Central Public Safety Facility to view the
current condition of the facility.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources
through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining
operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary
long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community
partnerships.

Provide sufficient resources and support to develop,
retain, and recruit a high quality city workforce.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Conducting and attending a public field trip is consistent with the Ralph M. Brown Act and city policy.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.

Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is scheduled to
conduct a public field trip to the
Central Public Safety Facility to
assess its current condition.
 The Central Public Safety Facility
includes the Police Department, Fire
Station 11, Fire Administration, and
the Emergency Operations Center.
 The facility, known as the "El
Cuartel" Building, has been in use
for nearly 66 years and faces
significant challenges with heating,
cooling, electrical, and plumbing
systems.
 The tour will start at 5:30 p.m.
outside the ADA-accessible
entrance to the City Council
Chamber at 580 Pacific St.,
Monterey, and proceed to 351
Madison Street.
 A presentation on the Central Public
Safety Facility Feasibility Study will
be given during the evening session
of the April 1, 2025 City Council
meeting.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 10.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 10., Item Page 1, Packet Page 97 №10/24
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

None.

DISCUSSION:

The Central Public Safety Facility, located at the corner of Pacific and Madison Streets, is made up of the City’s Police Department, Fire Station 11, and Emergency Operations Center (EOC), as well as the Fire Administration and Police Investigations modular buildings. This facility also serves as the primary location for the City’s information services and technology infrastructure.

The “El Cuartel” Building was opened nearly 66 years ago, on May 10, 1959. The Monterey Police Department is approximately 17,088 square feet and Monterey Fire Station 11 (previously Station 1) is approximately 5,480 square feet. The building has surpassed its useful lifespan, and issues such as heating, cooling, electrical, and plumbing all provide significant challenges.

Staff will be conducting a guided tour, highlighting the ongoing issues with the current facilities.

The tour will be led by the Public Works Director and will include information about facility needs, challenges, and maintenance services from the Police Chief, Fire Chief, and Public Works General Services Superintendent.

The Council and public will meet and convene outside the ADA-accessible entrance to the City Council Chamber at 580 Pacific St., Monterey at 5:30 p.m. and will cross the street together to visit the facilities at 351 Madison Street. No transportation will be provided. There will be an opportunity for public comment on this item at the end of the tour.

During the evening session of the April 1, 2025 City Council meeting, the City Council will receive a presentation on the Central Public Safety Facility Feasibility Study from consultant Jeff Katz of COAR Design Group.

AR/mb
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 10., Item Page 2, Packet Page 98 Council
Agenda Report
№10/24
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Receive a Presentation on the Monterey Public Safety Facility Feasibility Study (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive a presentation regarding the Monterey Public Safety Facility Feasibility Study.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Provide sufficient resources and support to develop,
retain, and recruit a high-quality city workforce.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources
through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining
operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary
long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community
partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This Study is consistent with the City Council’s Vision and Strategic Initiative of “Working to improve the quality of life of our residents” by ensuring that the City’s
infrastructure meets the needs of the community,
including those who work to provide services to the City.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications for receiving a
presentation.

Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council will receive a
presentation on the Monterey Public
Safety Facility Feasibility Study.
 The facility includes the Police
Department, Fire Station 11, Fire
Administration, and the Emergency
Operations Center.
 The current public safety facility,
built in 1959, is outdated and does
not meet modern needs for the
Police and Fire Departments.
 Significant issues include heating,
cooling, plumbing, electrical
systems, and space constraints.
 Two design options are proposed:
one with below-grade parking and a
single-story building, and another
with at-grade parking and a twostory building.
 The feasibility study recommends
building a new facility, estimated to
cost between $140 million and $170
million. The City Council is expected
to discuss alternative solutions to
reduce costs while meeting needs of
the organization.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 11.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 11., Item Page 1, Packet Page 99 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

There are no alternatives to consider.

DISCUSSION:

Central Public Safety Facility Capital Improvement Needs The Central Public Safety Facility, located at the corner of Pacific and Madison Streets, is made up of the City’s Police Department, Fire Station 11, and Emergency Operations Center (EOC), as well as the Fire Administration and Police Investigations modular buildings. This facility also serves as the primary location for the City’s information services and technology infrastructure.

The “El Cuartel” Building was opened 62 years ago, on May 10, 1959. The Monterey Police Department is approximately 17,088 square feet and Monterey Fire Station 11 (previously Station 1) is approximately 5,480 square feet. The building has surpassed its useful lifespan and issues such as heating, cooling, electricity and plumbing as well as space constraints all provide significant challenges to the Monterey Police and Fire Departments for current needs and will not support future department growth and changes needed to serve the Monterey community in the future.

The bathrooms and locker rooms in the building have had numerous sewage backup and overflow incidents which cannot be resolved without significant renovation and replacement of utilities. The heating/cooling system is not zoned properly due to system limitations, creating cold areas in one portion of the building and hot areas in others, often during the cold and hot seasons of the year. The HVAC system is beyond its useful life and repair costs are escalating due to the age of the system. A full HVAC replacement would cost over one million dollars. The electrical system is antiquated and includes the "push-button" light switch technology of the 1950s, as well as being undersized to support the ever increasing electrical, technology and data needs for the City.

The original 1959 facility does not meet the needs of today’s public safety and response personnel. The buildings do not meet the Building Code requirement as Essential Service buildings, which is intended to ensure the facility can continue to operate after a seismic event.

There is insufficient storage space for evidence, a lack of locker room space to accommodate Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 11., Item Page 2, Packet Page 100 different gender demographic makeup of the departments and gender-neutral personnel, limited office, training and meeting space, as well as access control and critical security concerns.

Offices have shuffled and have been converted into locker room facilities, which has led to a decrease in staff workspace. Furthermore, Police training has greatly evolved since 1959 and areas specifically devoted to training and wellness need to be part of a facility. The MPD Investigations Division, Fire Administration, and some evidence and property storage are provided in standalone, prefabricated buildings, or shipping containers located in the parking area. The Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is also housed in the Central Public Facility.

The EOC, which was constructed with NCIP funding in 1998, does not have adequate meeting or storage space.

Central Public Safety Facility Feasibility Study
For these reasons, Council authorized a feasibility study and approved a contract with the COAR Design Group on July 19, 2022. This presentation is the result of this study, which included growth projections and assessing space needs according to industry standards. COAR Design Group has over 30 years of experience in the design of public safety facilities, completing over 450 public works projects across California, including numerous police and fire facilities, administration centers, and public facilities for municipalities.

COAR Design Group staff met with City staff to identify current deficiencies and future needs.

City of Monterey staff that participated in the exploratory phase comprised of, firefighters, police officers, administration staff as well as the Police and Fire Chiefs, Public Works Director, Finance Director, Assistant City Manager, and City Manager. The feasibility study included the development of a detailed space needs study, an assessment of the current building conditions and the development of several design options to address the proposed facility needs.

As a part of the assessment of the existing facilities, COAR determined that renovation of the existing facilities was challenging and not a practical solution to meeting the overall needs of the City. This feasibility study focused on a new facility that would meet all of the current and future needs of the Monterey Police and Fire Departments. This feasibility study resulted in a recommendation to create a facility that would replace the current facility and that addresses the needs of the Monterey Police and Fire Departments.

CORE estimates the cost of building a new facility ranges between $140 million and $170 million. This cost would include design and construction.

Conceptual drawings were provided for two different concepts. After many discussions with the stakeholders on the project, two options were ultimately presented to the City team for consideration. Both options maintain a building footprint of approximately 52,000 square feet.

Option 1 proposes a secure, below-grade parking structure, with the police and fire station constructed above. This option features a primarily single-story building design, with a small second-floor area dedicated to administrative functions, and represents the higher-cost alternative. Option 2 offers at-grade parking and a two-story building construction.

Once a decision is made to proceed with the design and construction of a new facility there are multiple ways this can be accomplished. From traditional design-bid-build, to Design Build, to Construction Manager at Risk (CAR) to PPP (Public Private Partnership). There are advantages and disadvantages to each depending on the risk distribution desired by the City.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 11., Item Page 3, Packet Page 101 Further discussion of delivery methods is recommended once the funding source and timing is identified.

City staff has followed the direction provided by City Council to study and identify space requirements and needs by utilizing a consultant with great expertise in this field.

Next Steps
The $140M to $170M cost of building a new facility to replace the existing 1959 facility has been proven to be cost prohibitive.

At the evening session of the April 1, 2025 City Council meeting, Jeff Katz, Principal of COAR Design Group, will present findings from the Public Safety Facility Study. At this meeting, staff would also like to hear Council’s thoughts and ideas that may meet the Police Department and Fire Department needs while reducing the costs associated. While it may not be as desirable as a new facility, staff believe that exploring other alternatives would be beneficial given the monumental cost of a new facility as well as our current severe challenges in funding on-going infrastructure rehabilitation needs across the whole City.

AR
c: COAR Design Group
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 11., Item Page 4, Packet Page 102 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: David J. Hober, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Receive Police Department Annual Report – 2024 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive the Monterey Police
Department (MPD) Annual Report – 2024.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing;
and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Receiving the 2024 Monterey Police Department Annual
Report is consistent with the City Council’s Value Driver and Quality of Life Strategic Priorities: Recognize that public safety is a priority to ensure that our City is safe and welcoming to all, contributing to our economic
vitality as a destination City; prepare for emergencies and community resiliency; recognize that our workforce
is our greatest resource for providing the service that our community deserves by providing city staff with the
tools, resources, coaching, and feedback they need to
perform well; transparent and inclusive government – foster a local government that is transparent and collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Receiving the 2024 Monterey Police Department Annual Report carries no fiscal impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is recommended to
receive the Monterey Police
Department (MPD) Annual Report
for 2024.
 The report highlights the MPD's
achievements, initiatives, and
performance over the past year.
 Key focuses include public safety,
community partnerships, proactive
policing strategies, and officer
training.
 The report aims to improve
transparency and accessibility
through statistical data, narrative
vignettes, and visual elements.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 12.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 1, Packet Page 103 №10/24
on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The presentation of the 2024 Monterey Police Department Annual Report serves as an opportunity to equip the Council with essential insights into the operations and achievements of their Police Department. However, it remains within the Council's discretion to decline acceptance of the report.

DISCUSSION:

The 2024 Monterey Police Department (MPD) Annual Report highlights the Department’s key achievements, initiatives, and performance over the past year. This comprehensive report serves as a testament to the MPD’s commitment to ensuring public safety, fostering community partnerships, and delivering professional law enforcement services to the City of Monterey.

The Annual Report presents a blend of statistical data, narrative vignettes, and visual elements such as graphs and photographs to provide transparency and enhance accessibility for readers.

The report underscores the MPD’s significant progress in addressing crime, community engagement efforts, training programs, and operational advancements.

In 2024, the MPD continued its focus on proactive policing strategies and strengthened relationships with Monterey’s diverse community, including residents, businesses, military personnel, educational institutions, and visitors.

The report also provides insight into the Department’s ongoing efforts to recruit and retain highly qualified personnel, further officer training to meet contemporary demands, and enhance public trust through transparency and accountability.

The Annual Report reflects the Department’s commitment to serve those who live, learn, work, and visit Monterey. It further illustrates the collaborative support of the City Council, City staff, and community members, who remain vital partners in the MPD’s success.

Staff recommends that the City Council review and accept the 2024 Monterey Police Department Annual Report as a comprehensive overview of the Department’s achievements and its dedication to maintaining a safe and vibrant community.

Attachments: 1. The 2024 Monterey Police Department Annual Report Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 2, Packet Page 104 W H O W E A R E . W H A T W E R E P R E S E N T
OUR MISSION. OUR VISION. OUR VALUES

MISSION
Responsive to All, Second to None, Every Time
VISION
The Monterey Police Department is a
professional, dynamic and innovative organization
with the highest ethical standards. The MPD is
committed to serving everyone with honor,
dignity, fairness and respect.

DEPARTMENT VALUES
Maximize, Value and Train our MPD Workforce
Proactively Police the City of Monterey to Ensure
a Low Crime Rate
Develop, Embrace and Enhance Community
Partnerships

MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT
2024 ANNUAL REPORT
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 3, Packet Page 105

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
02- CHIEF'S MESSAGE
03- MONTEREY QUICK FACTS
04- MPD ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
05- I.MPD WORK FORCE
08- II.MPD POLICE SERVICE
14- III.OFFENSE AND ARREST SUMMARY REPORT
16- IV.MPD TRANSPARENCY
20- V.MPD HIRING AND TRAINING - AN OVERVIEW
21- VI.MPD ACCOMPLISHMENTS / PRIORITIES 2024-2025
22- VII.MPD -WE WILL NEVER FORGET
Staffing
National and State Average of Sworn Officers
New Staff / Awards / Retirements
Calls for Service
Department Activity
Contemporary Policing Solutions
Multidisciplinary Outreach Team
Jail & Records
Offense & Arrest Reporting
Traffic Reporting
Equitable Justice and Policing: Three Influencing Dimensions Force Application
ICAT and CIT Training
Equipment and Technology
Internal Affairs
Annual Military Equipment Reporting
Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) System
Police Officer Selection Process
POST Basic Course Academy
MPD Field Training Program
Probationary Period
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 4, Packet Page 106 It is my honor and privilege to represent the Monterey Police Department (MPD) as the Chief of Police. Our 2024 MPD Annual Report serves as a platform to showcase some of our accomplishments in 2024, along with general information about the MPD. We aim to present this information in an accessible format, featuring statistics, vignettes, graphs, and photos.

The dedicated individuals of the MPD understand that working for the City of Monterey is a privilege. We take pride in serving a city enriched by generations of hardworking community members, two military training institutions shaping America’s service members, internationally and regionally renowned educational institutions, and a world-renowned tourist destination with a legacy steeped in literary history and marine biology research—all nestled within one of the most breathtaking coastal locations in the world. This unique environment inspires us to provide the most professional and contemporary police services to those who live, learn, work, and visit Monterey.

I want to extend my gratitude to the community, City Council, and all City staff for their unwavering support of the Monterey Police Department. I would especially like to commend the men and women of the MPD for their dedication, hard work, and commitment to serving others.

As you explore this 2024 edition of the Monterey Police Department Annual Report, we hope it provides valuable insight into your police department and the work we do for our community.

C H I E F ' S M E S S A G E
David J. Hober
Chief of Police
02 MPD Annual Report 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 5, Packet Page 107

CITY OF MONTEREY
Monterey Quick Facts
POPULATION:

LAND AREA:
29,116
ELEVATION: 26 ft. (City Council Chambers)
FOUNDED:

CAPITAL:

NICKNAMES:

MONTEREY PD:

ATTRACTIONS
Monterey Bay Aquarium, Cannery Row, Fisherman's Wharf,
Downtown, Recreation Trail, Monterey Jazz Festival, Colton Hall, Defense Language Institute, Naval Postgraduate School, Doc Rickett's Pacific Biological Laboratories
03 MPD Annual Report 2024

NEIGHBORHOODS
Aguajito Oaks, Alta Mesa, Casanova Oak Knoll, Del Monte Beach, Del Monte Grove/ Laguna Grande, Deer Flats, Downtown, Fisherman's Flats, Glenwood, Monterey Vista, New Monterey, Oak Grove, Old Town, Skyline Forest, Skyline Ridge, Villa Del Monte
CONSTITUTION:

8.65 Square Miles
June 30,1770
Capital of Alta California of Spain (1804- 1821)
Hosted California's first constitutional
convention in 1849 after Mexico ceded California to the United States.
and of Mexico (1822 -1836)
First City and The Cradle of History
Established in 1911
(U.S. Census Bureau 2023 Estimate)
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 6, Packet Page 108

OPERATIONS

P A T R O L P A T R O L

C O M M U N I T Y

A C T I O N T E A M

CHIEF OF POLICE

L I E U T E N A N T

A P L A T O O N B P L A T O O N T R A I N I N G / I A I N V E S T I G A T I O N S

M P D R E S E R V E O F F I C E R P R O G R A M

M P D V O L U N T E E R P R O G R A M

M P D C H A P L A I N P R O G R A M

E V I D E N C E
S A A
A D M I N .

S U P P O R T

S E R V I C E S

P A T R O L D I V I S I O N

L I E U T E N A N T

P R D S

R E C O R D S

O P E R A T I O N S

A S S I S T A N T C H I E F O F P O L I C E

C H I E F O F P O L I C E

L I E U T E N A N T

A D M I N / I N V E S T I G A T I O N S

R E C O R D S / J A I L / F I N A N C E
Watch I
Watch II
Watch III

T R A F F I C D I V I S I O N

A C A D E M Y / F T O
Watch I
Watch II
Watch III
MDOT
Homeless Navigator
MCBH Mobile Crisis
APS Social Worker
CHOMP Homeless Nav

INTERIM
53 Sworn
Police Officers
19 Professional
Staff 04
MPD Annual Report 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 7, Packet Page 109

MPD COM
0 20 40 60 80 100
BA Degree
Male
Female
Asian
Hispanic
Black
White

MPD AND CITY OF MONTEREY

DEMOGRAPHICS
I. MPD

WORKFORCE
MPD City of Monterey
72%
9%
11%
13%
4%
3%
70%
67%
21%
7%
50%
50%
54%
STAFFING 2023 2022 2021 2020
Sworn Officers % Below Street Ready -15% -19% -16% -16% Number of Sworn Officers Authorized 53 53 53 53
NATIONAL AND STATE AVERAGE RATIO OF SWORN OFFICERS PER 1,000 RESIDENTS Ratio (2023) California - per 1,000 inhabitants
Ratio (2023) United States - per 1,000 inhabitants

3.5 3.51
3 1
4 4
1 2
MPD collegiate education includes BA degree 72% & Masters Degree 28%.

National female ratio of sworn officers was 16.5% in 2023 (FBI Crime Data Explorer). "Below Street Ready" includes vacancies, disability, military leave, and officers that are in entry-level training prior to becoming solo-beat officers.
3 4 FBI Crime Data Explorer. 05
MPD Annual Report 2024
2024
-19%
53 https://www.census.gov
Ratio (2023) Monterey - per 1,000 inhabitants 2.12 4
2 91%
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 8, Packet Page 110

SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE

ANALYST

KAREN FAUROT

NEW MPD STAFF
New Staff /
Retirements in 2024 RETIREMENTS
Senior Administrative Analyst Karen Faurot was an
integral part of the Monterey Police Department from
2007-2024. Karen was an Executive Assistant prior to
being promoted to Administrative Analyst in 2013, and
Senior Administrative Analyst in 2017. Karen was in
charge of preparing the budget, contracts and grants
for the Police Department. She also oversaw the
support services division of the department.

Congratulations on your retirement, Karen! 06
MPD Annual Report 2024

POLICE OFFICER

POLICE SERVICES TECHNICIAN
Breanna Cullers
Reis Avila

POLICE SERVICES TECHNICIAN
Melissa Longueira

POLICE OFFICER
Michael “Mick” Edelen

RESERVE POLICE OFFICER

POLICE SERVICES TECHNICIAN
Victoriya Digirolamo

POLICE OFFICER
Dev Shah
Caterina Montante

POLICE SERVICES TECHNICIAN
Zachary Weis
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 9, Packet Page 111

MERITORIOUS SERVICES AWARDS
Officer David Vasalech
Officer Andrew Herndon
Officer Joey Parigi
Officer Kim Zook
Officer Trevor Howell
Officer Andrew Herndon
Officer Joey Parigi
Officer Juan Castro
Officer Brendan Dias
2024 MAJOR AWARDS

O F F I C E R O F T H E Y E A R

P R O F E S S I O N A L

E M P L O Y E E

O F T H E Y E A R

C O M M U N I T Y O R I E N T E D

P O L I C I N G A W A R D
O f f i c e r B r e n t H a l l
Brent was the only Officer assigned to the
Traffic unit in 2024. In this assignment, he
addressed community traffic concerns,
responded to serious collisions and assisted in
filling vacant positions for other units such as
Patrol, CAT, and Investigations. Brent
volunteered to assist with lengthy prisoner
transports and even created snack bags for
officers and prisoners. He does it all with a
positive attitude and never complains. Brent is
also committed to building trust within the
community. He goes above and beyond to
build positive relationships with business
owners and citizens.

P o l i c e S e r v i c e s T e c h n i c i a n
M o n i c a G o n z a l e z
Monica was described by her peers as an
exceptional teammate who exemplifies
reliability, expertise and a commitment to
excellence in every aspect of her job. She
consistently goes above and beyond to ensure
the success of her team. Monica is assigned to
the evidence/property room where she has
done an outstanding job and has great
attention to detail. She is always responsive to
the needs of the department and the public.

C S O L e t i c i a P e r e z
Leticia was assigned to the CAT team in
2024. She was essential in coordinating
community policing events to include Coffee
with a Cop, Cocoa with a Cop, and the MPD
toy drive. Leticia went above and beyond by
decorating the patrol vehicles, and raising
money for gifts in order to make the MPD
toy drive extra special for all the families in
need. She is compassionate with the public
and is highly respected by her peers. 07
MPD Annual Report 2024

C O M M U N I T Y O R I E N T E D

P O L I C I N G A W A R D

V O L U N T E E R O F T H E Y E A R
O f f i c e r A l f r e d o S a b i n o
Officer Sabino demonstrated great
commitment to the MPD community policing
philosophy. Officer Sabino worked to address
homelessness concerns and quality of life
issues. Although assigned to CAT Freddy could
often be found helping other units by filling
patrol vacancies, handling animal complaints
and helping however he could. Freddy was
noticed for his approachable demeanor with
MPD staff and the community.

C h a p l a i n R o y P i n a
Roy has been a standout member of the
volunteer team. He is a frequent presence in
the department, at special events, and provides
support to MPD staff and the community. Roy
always has a positive attitude and frequently
brings in food donations to brighten the staff’s
day. He has consistently demonstrated
exceptional commitment and service to the
MPD and the community. Roy’s compassion
and support to MPD staff does not go
unnoticed.

DISTINGUISHED SERVICE
AWARDS

LIFESAVING AWARDS
Officer Jacob Singley
Officer Anthony Lee
Officer Rajheim Hunt
Officer Juan Rodriguez
Officer Andrew Herndon
Officer David Vasalech
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 10, Packet Page 112 45,328
Monterey PD Calls for Service in 2024
1,387
Monterey PD
Seaside PD Marina PD
Pacific Grove PD

CSUMB PD
Del Rey Oaks PD
Sand City PD
Carmel-by-the-Sea Monterey Fire Department
0 10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
45328
36199
23659
14571
4937
3656 3308 1387
11440

1.CALLS FOR SERVICE
II. MPD
POLICE

SERVICE
2024
Monterey PD 45,328
36,199

2. DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY
Total Department
1 Includes total number of narrative reports, supplemental reports, arrests, field interview cards, citations.

Seaside PD
Marina PD 23,659
Pacific Grove PD 14,571
Monterey Fire Dept. 11,440
Total Department Activity
Narrative Reports
Supplemental Reports
Online Reports
Felony Arrests (Booked)
Misdemeanor Arrests (booked)
DUI Arrests
Citations 2
Parking Citations
Proactive Foot Patrols
Special Event Overtime (hours)
Sworn Officer Training
Nacran Administered (Opioid OD)
1 Carmel-by-the-Sea PD
CSUMB PD 4,937
08 MPD Annual Report 2024
Sand City PD 3,308
Del Rey Oaks PD 3,656
2023
2 Hazard, Non-hazard, Administrative Citations.
2024
10,987
3,786 3,155
1,382 1,551
187 144
236 225
822 797
193 222
1,513 2,067
667 466
4,314
1,181 1,574
4,881 5,213
12 17
11,500
6,004
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 11, Packet Page 113 T R A F F I C U N I T ( 1 - M O T O R C Y C L E O F F I C E R ) COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM CAT 2023
2023
Traffic Stops 388
Hazardous Citations 313
437
Non-Hazardous Citations 131
Injury Collision Reports 21
Patrol Coverage Hours
Arrests 111
Citations 168
Encampment Cleanups 524
MDOT Housed Persons 10
MDOT Services Provided 147
Community Outreach Meetings 94
Special Event Hours 270
Patrol Coverage (hours) 1137
INVESTIGATIONS 2024
Assigned Cases 80
New Cases Assigned 192
Closed Cases 128
Arrests 42
Firearms Recovered 13
Lab Submissions 55
Search Warrants 127
DA Complaints Issued 32
10 147
MDOT Housed
Persons
MDOT Services
Provided
Investigations Call-outs 10 09
MPD Annual Report 2024
2023
68 219
202
69 7
40 101
42 20
2024
67 101
737
2 135
144
340
301
2024
475
287
319
94 12
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 12, Packet Page 114

CONTEMPORARY

POLICING SOLUTIONS
The MPD Community Action Team Sergeant works with Monterey County Department of Social Services, Gathering for Women and the HOME Collaborative to co-teach a multi-disciplinary approach to provide tools and resources to assist community members to move from homeless to housed. This course is now POST certified and is available to other police departments.

MULTI- DISCIPLINARY OUTREACH TEAM (MDOT)
CAT and MPD officers offer services in every contact they make with persons who appear to be un-housed. MPD has collaborated with a myriad of agencies to address homelessness, domestic violence, substance abuse and other quality of life issues. This collaboration led to the creation of the MultiDisciplinary Outreach Team (MDOT) and includes the following meetings and personnel (all of the personnel have devoted office space at the MPD and work directly along-side MPD CAT staff):

NAVIGATOR UNIVERSITY

COMMUNITY POLICING ACADEMY

COMMUNITY AND BUSINESS MEETINGS

SOCIAL MEDIA OUTREACH
MPD Webpage, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Nextdoor

TRANSPARENCY
MPD webpage – annual reporting, monthly reporting, crime statistics, case & arrest booking logs, policies/procedures & training outlines, complaints & commendations, and media releases. 10
MPD Annual Report 2024
Homeless Exchange – a monthly meeting between the MPD Community Action Team and local social service providers.

City Liaison Group – a monthly meeting with multiple city department first line supervisors designed to address specific issues in the city of Monterey.

Adult Protective Services – a Monterey County social worker is an MPD CSO intern and handles issues related to elderly or dependent adults.

Montage Health/CHOMP Community Outreach – a CHOMP social worker engages with people who are homeless or in danger of becoming homeless.

Monterey County Behavioral Health – A Monterey County crisis worker is available to handle calls or on-going problems related to individuals suffering from mental health-related issues.

Interim, Inc. – An Interim Outreach Counselor provides resources such as housing, residential treatment, social support and supported education and employment services for adults who have mental illnesses.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 13, Packet Page 115 MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT’S
MULTIDISCIPLINARY OUTREACH TEAM:
11 MPD Annual Report 2024

TEAM DEVELOPMENT & PROBLEM SOLVING APPROACH
MDOT was developed in 2018 in response to concern about the number of unsheltered individuals in the City of Monterey. A collaborative, whole-of-community approach was necessary to get these individuals the help they need and services they deserve.

The approach also needed to be sustainable and comprehensive. MPD was accustomed to making frequent contact with individuals (over 500 contacts was not uncommon), but they were not used to connecting with social services and other agencies. Collaboration with community partners became a core element of MDOT’s work. Adult Protective Services and Montage Health became the first agencies to join MPD as members of MDOT. They created permanent desks for their employees at the police department.

Monterey County Behavioral Health, and Interim Incorporated’s Mc Home also became members, and each of them has a permanent desk at the police department where they can quickly and effectively respond to the needs of the unsheltered.

With trust in the community building, MDOT focused on sustainability of care for their clients. Historically, support services and police departments have little interaction between each other. That lack of communication between these agencies leads to difficulty in providing long-term support for those who need it. This led to the creation of a monthly meeting between MDOT and representatives from 14 other agencies known as the “Homeless Exchange.” This meeting allows organizations with knowledge and access to specialized resources to coordinate and provide comprehensive care for specific individuals.

MDOT also developed a recurring City Liaison meeting with first-line supervisors designed to give City departments the opportunity to share quality of life concerns that MDOT may be able to address.

A child’s scream breaks the silence in the middle of a cold night. Residents in nearby homes realize the sound is coming from outside. The child is clearly just a baby.

Fearful of potential danger, concerned residents alert the Monterey Police Department (MPD). They worry that drugs may be involved, but when officers arrive, the scene is not at all what anyone imagined.

The officers find two sober parents down on their luck with nowhere to go, doing what they can to keep their infant warm and fed.

This scenario is exactly why the Multidisciplinary Outreach Team (MDOT) was created. The team was designed specifically to help find long-term, effective solutions to homelessness. MDOT was able to get the child and parents temporary shelter.

A TRUE STORY

SUCCESS STORIES
MPD officers were continually dealing with a habitual drunkard causing issues in the downtown area, often leading to his arrest or transport to CHOMP for treatment. CAT officers began reaching out to the male and got him connected to resources. MDOT/CAT transported the male to Genesis house, ultimately leading to the male having a long stint of sobriety.

CAT Officers built rapport with two female subjects who were living in tents throughout the city. After several contacts, CAT was able to collaborate with a shelter provider to get the first woman housed, where she stayed for several weeks. The second woman has accepted shelter and then will leave after short stints, but CAT still continues to assist her in hopes of her finding long term stability.

CAT contacted a male who had recently become homeless again after having housing for several months. CAT got him re enrolled in a shelter program.

Throughout the year, CAT routinely assisted MDOT social workers with taking clients to and from appointments, and arranging transportation to shelters. CAT assisted during inclement weather and awarded 8 inclement weather vouchers during the spring storms of 2024.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 14, Packet Page 116 MPD

OUTREACH & NAVIGATION
CENTER
12 MPD Annual Report 2024

OUTREACH AND NAVIGATION CENTER
The MPD has also opened an Outreach and Navigation Center (Substation) located at 401 Camino El Estero provides. This dedicated space provides a collaborative workspace for MPD, MDOT, and other service providers and is an ideal location in close proximity to those in need of services. The MPD collaborated with the Central Coast Overdose Prevention coalition to install free Narcan dispensers at the substation, the MPD and the Transit Center to increase access to this lifesaving medication. Easy access to Narcan saves lives during an overdose when it can be administered immediately.

As these examples clearly demonstrate, the MPD Homeless Navigator and Outreach and Navigation Center have made an immediate positive impact on the lives of vulnerable individuals in our community. The MPD will continue to embrace a proactive approach to preserving community safety and providing exceptional public service.

HOMELESS NAVIGATOR
California faces the largest homelessness crisis in the U.S., with an estimated 151,000 individuals living without shelter—half of the nation’s total homeless population. The Monterey Police Department (MPD) frequently responds to calls involving unhoused individuals, often related to mental health or substance abuse issues. Many of these cases are non-criminal or involve minor offenses that do not warrant arrests. Despite the availability of resources, the complexity of accessing assistance often deters participation.

To address this issue, MPD hired a Homeless Navigator in December 2023.

This role focuses on outreach, case management, and connecting individuals with essential resources. The Homeless Navigator collaborates with officers, service providers, and the Multi-Disciplinary Outreach Team (MDOT) to improve the city’s response to homelessness.

Homelessness is not a crime, and the MPD is committed to fostering relationships with the homeless community and service providers to create long-term solutions. In early 2024, the Homeless Navigator established vital community partnerships and expanded collaborations with organizations such as the Coalition for Homeless Service Providers, Salinas Valley Health Associates, and Dorothy’s Place.

The Navigator’s efforts have yielded impactful results, including helping an unhoused veteran reconnect with family, facilitating treatment for individuals struggling with substance abuse, and supporting employment and housing for those seeking stability.

While the initial Homeless Navigator departed in August 2024, MPD aims to fill the position by April 2025, ensuring continued progress in addressing homelessness within Monterey.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 15, Packet Page 117

MPD JAIL AND

RECORDS
13 MPD Annual Report 2024

JAIL INSPECTIONS
The Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) conducted the 2023- 2024 biennial on-site inspection of the Monterey City Jail to determine compliance with the minimum standards for local detention facilities, as outlined in Titles 15 and 24, pursuant to Penal Code Section 6031. The BSCC also conducted compliance monitoring pursuant to Welfare & Institutions Code Section 209(f) for the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA). Additionally, local inspections by the County Health Officer and the State Fire Marshal were conducted in the following areas:

Fire and Life Safety (conducted in person on 8/8/24)
Medical and Mental Health (on 5/21/24)
Nutritional Health (on 6/11/24)
Environmental Health (on 5/21/24)
The BSCC, County Health Officer and State Fire Marshal determined the Monterey City Jail to be in compliance and no corrective actions required. 966 Monterey Police Service Technicians booked a
total of 966 subjects in 2024.
479 Police Services Technicians processed 479
informational reports, which include found/lost
property, found/lost animals, repossessed/towed
vehicles, and online reports.

Monterey Senior Police Services Technicians 3,713 booked 3,713 items of property in 2024. subjects
booked
informational
reports
property booked
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 16, Packet Page 118

C R I M E A G A I N S T P E R S O N
III. OFFENSE AND ARREST

SUMMARY REPORT
14 MPD Annual Report 2024
The Monterey Police Department utilized the National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) and California Incident Based Reporting System (CIBRS) starting in March 2022. Annual comparison data will be available in 2025.
499
943

C R I M E A G A I N S T P R O P R T Y

C R I M E A G A I N S T S O C I E T Y
385
Rape
Robbery
Aggravated Assault
Burglary
Larceny
Offenses
Reported
Offense
Counterfeiting / Forgery
Fraud
Drug / Narcotic Violations
2 0 2 4 O F F E N S E R E P O R T I N G
Motor Vehicle Theft
Murder
Arson
Embezzlement
Vandalism
Simple Assault

M O N T E R E Y P O L I C E D E P A R T M E N T
Total Offenses
Group A Crime Rate per 100,000 Population
Total Arrests
Arrest Rate per 100,000 Population
Hate Crime Offenses
Law Officers Assaulted
Summary based reporting Crime Rate per
100,000 Population
1,827
784
6443.99
2197.4
9 22
2222.07
0 10
18 80
73 414
29 6
287
49 162
171
10 121
Stolen Property 52
Weapons Law Violations 35
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 17, Packet Page 119

T E N Y E A R T R A F F I C R E P O R T I N G
15 MPD Annual Report 2024
2 0 2 4 C O L L I S I O N S

H I G H I N C I D E N T I N T E R S E C T I O N L O C A T I O N S Del Monte Avenue Sloat Avenue 6
Camino El Estero Del Monte Avenue 5
Del Monte Avenue Washington Street 5
David Avenue Lighthouse Avenue (W) 4
Franklin Street Tyler Street 4
Lighthouse Avenue Reeside Avenue 4
Del Monte Avenue La Playa Avenue 3
Franklin Street Pacific Street 3
Abrego Street Fremont Street 2
Airport Road Fremont Street 2
Casa Verde Way Del Monte Avenue 2
Casa Verde Way Hwy 1 NB Onramp 2
Casanova Avenue Sequoia Avenue 2
785 819 764 437

TRAFFIC REPORTING

COLLISIONS
Injury
Non Injury
2014 2015 2016
1 0
195 186 223
589 633 614
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2023/2024
Change
2023/2024
% Change
TOTAL
Fatal 0 2 1 1 1 3 1 +200%
231 221 215 122 124 159 -4 -2.8%
523 540 548 314 409 389 +73 +21.2%
837 756 762 536 549 +71 +14.5%
DUI Arrest 297 221 219 192 171 191 111 150 261 -30 -13.5% Collision 55 54 52 42 49 69 32 56 62 +11 +23.9%
2023
0 144
344
488
222
46 at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
2024
2 140
417
559
192
57 +2
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 18, Packet Page 120

EQUITABLE JUSTICE AND
POLICING: THREE

INFLUENCING DIMENSIONS

1. TRANSPARENCY
The vision statement and ethos of the MPD establish the foundation by which all of the Department’s staff operate.

The three influencing dimensions that support the Police Department’s efforts towards equitable justice and policing are as follows:
1- LEGAL MANDATES AND REQUIREMENTS OF CA Police Departments and police officers
In this dimension lies the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) and other legal
requirements such as legislative mandates. It is through these guidelines (some legally mandated, some best
practices) that the MPD ensures requirements for the hiring and continual training of personnel.
2- Constant Review of Best Policing Practices from across the country
Such as the six pillars of President Barack Obama's Task Force on 21st Century Policing, a benchmark document
released in 2015.
3 - Implementation of and accountability by the MPD and the community
This dimension involves analyzing, responding and assessing all of the aspects included in the other dimensions and ensuring implementation through policy, selection, training, accountability and constant review and update. A crucial aspect in this dimension is the interaction, relationship and input with and from the community.

Reinforced with self-awareness, policy, selection, training, supervision, leadership, accountability and review.

IV. TRANSPARENCY
16 MPD Annual Report 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 19, Packet Page 121

2.FORCE APPLICATION
The MPD consistently reviews its policy to ensure it is in compliance with the law and best practices, primarily through new MPD (Lexipol) policy releases.

The following is a review of MPD policy (sections noted in parentheses) as outlined in POST Use of Force Standards and Guidelines, (2020) by California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST), which includes 21 standards as follows:
·Fair and unbiased policing (LE Code of Ethics; Vision; 100.5; 102.3; 300.2; 300.2.2; 313; 319.4; 319.5.3; 319.5.9(f))
·Alternatives to use of force - De-escalation & force alternatives (300.4.6; 300.3; 427.5; 427.6; 430.3)
·Application of Use of Force – Proportionality (300; 300.2; 300.3) ·Application of Use of Force – Approved methods and devices (300; 302; 303; 304; 305; 306)
·Application of Deadly Force (300; 300.5)
·Use of firearms – Draw/exhibit a firearm (300; 300.5.2; 321.2.2; 306) ·Use of firearms – Risk to bystanders (300; 300.5)
·Use of firearms – Vehicles (300; 300.5.1)
·Duty to Intervene (300; 300.2.1)
·Reporting potential excessive use of force (300.2.3)
·Duty to provide or procure medical assistance (300; 300.2; 300.7; 303.7.3; 304.7) ·Reporting use of force – Internal reporting & notification (300; 300.6; 321.2.2; 304.4; 303.11; 305.12)
·Supervisor’s responsibility – Supervisor review of force (300; 300.8; 301; 304.8) ·Use of Force Incident Review – Internal reporting and notification (300; 300.8; 301; 304; 305) – MPD Command review all Uses of Force.
·Policy availability to the public (300; 300.13)
·Policy review and update (300; 300.12)
·Procedures regarding citizen complaints (300; 300.11; 1010) ·Disclosure of public records related to the use of force (300; 300.14) ·Training requirements – Vulnerable populations (332; 336; 426; 427) ·Training requirements – Demonstrated knowledge and understanding (300; 300.9) ·Training requirements – Minimum training and course titles (300; 300.9) During 2024, there were a total of 30 separate UOF incidents by members of MPD where officers used any level of force. This averages out to approximately

2.5 UOF incidents per month, although one month, October, saw 7 incidents.

The level of force used by officers during 2024 was almost exclusively physical force, to include takedowns, control holds, body weight and/or pain compliance techniques. As in prior years, this is the predominant UOF used by MPD officers and is considered the lowest level of force options. There were 3 total uses of a CEW (Taser) in 2024, 0 use of an impact weapon, 1 use of OC spray, 1 use of less lethal munitions, and 0 firearms discharged.

Ten suspects reported an injury during a UOF incident. All injuries consisted of minor abrasions. Six officers received minor injuries during the 2024 UOF incidents.

Twenty-Four of the thirty UOF incidents involved suspects who were either under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or showed signs of having mental health issues (or some combination of the three). A total of 53 officers were involved in the different UOF incidents. The department had one citizen complaint regarding a UOF incident.

The MPD continues to train all sworn personnel on Crisis Intervention Training (CIT) and Integrating Communication, Assessment and Tactics (ICAT). We also remain part of the One Mind Campaign sponsored by the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP). This program asks for police agencies to adopt four “Pillars” of professional conduct and policies to ensure the proper response to individuals that may be suffering from a mental health crisis. MPD is one of only 21 law enforcement agencies in California to be part of this campaign (over 667 across the US). Additionally, of the 21 California agencies that took the pledge, the MPD is 1 of 4 California agencies to have completed the pledge.

MPD continues to look to the future by addressing new technology, tactics and procedures in the field of force application.
17 MPD Annual Report 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 20, Packet Page 122

3.ICAT AND CIT-TRAINING
Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) –Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics (ICAT) is a training program designed to give officers a strong foundation in critical thinking as it relates to responding to crisis related incidents and potential use of force situations. ICAT has been designed to give officers the tools, skills and options to safely diffuse a wide variety of critical incidents that could potentially result in the use of force.

Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training is hosted by Monterey County Behavioral Health Services. The 40-hour training is taught by behavioral health, law enforcement and advocacy group members. The training provides officers with tools to better understand common signs and symptoms of mental illness and co-occurring disorders; recognize when those signs and symptoms represent a crisis situation; safely de-escalate individuals experiencing behavioral health crises and utilize community resources and diversion strategies to provide assistance.

The Monterey Police Department has adapted
the ICAT training into a two-day course of
both classroom presentation and hands-on
scenario based learning. The officers are
trained in combining critical thinking,
communication, crisis intervention and tactics
into an integrated and systematic approach
when responding to potentially critical
incidents. The ultimate goal is to keep both the
public and officers as safe as possible. A full
day of scenario based training follows the
classroom instruction, where officers and
supervisors put the training into use in multiple
simulated crisis situations.

ICAT incorporates the tenants of DeEscalation: Strategies & Techniques for California Law Enforcement, (2020) by
California Commission on Peace Officer
Standards and Training (POST), and
Guiding Principles on Use of Force,
(2016) by the Police Executive Research
Forum (PERF).

ICAT utilizes the Critical Decision Making Model (CDM)
18 MPD Annual Report 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 21, Packet Page 123

4.EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY

5. INTERNAL AFFAIRS
TThe MPD equips officers with contemporary tools to complement the deescalation training officers receive. Examples include the Taser Conducted Energy Device, plexi-glass shields, less-lethal kinetic energy projectiles, and the “WRAP” safe restraint device.

In 2024, the police department replaced thirteen (13) patrol rifles, purchased two pepper ball launchers, and one precision rifle for the regional SWAT team.

The MPD went live with a new Records Management System in February 2024 and a new Jail Booking Management System in May 2024. Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR) were installed throughout the city starting in November 2024. The ALPR's public transparency portal can be found at the MPD's website.

E Q U I P M E N T T E C H N O L O G Y
The MPD has a specific policy and procedure for receiving, investigating, and responding to citizen complaints (MPD Policy 1010). In 2016, the MPD contracted with outside consultants to conduct most citizen complaints. The Chief of Police reviews all complaints and investigations related to the complaints for final disposition. Citizen complaints are reported to the Civilian Complaints Against Peace Officers (CCAPO) database at the California Department of Justice annually. All complaints that include allegations of serious misconduct per the Commission of Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Regulation 1205 are sent to POST for an additional review in accordance with California Penal Code 13510.9.

In 2024, the MPD conducted eight internal affairs investigations involving sworn and jail staff, which included four department-initiated investigations and four citizen complaints. The complaints included allegations of procedural concerns, arrest or detention concerns, force concerns, courtesy concerns, bias based policing, and neglect of duty concerns. Of the eight complaints, one was sustained, three were exonerated, and four are still under investigation. In 2024, the MPD logged 45,328 calls for service; the eight internal affairs complaints represent .02% of the logged calls for service. 19
MPD Annual Report 2024

6. ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT REPORTING

7. AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READER
(ALPR) SYSTEM
The MPD provided an ALPR informational presentation to Council in November 2023, held town hall meetings in January and February 2024 and Council approved the MPD ALPR program on April 2, 2024. The MPD returned to Council on September 17, 2024 for approval of the contract for procurement with Flock Safety. The ALPR cameras started being installed in November 2024 and the system was functional at the end of December 2024. Additional cameras that are to be located on state or private property will be installed in early 2025. The MPD webpage includes a Flock camera transparency portal that includes information about the camera system, a map with the camera locations, the MPD ALPR policy and other pertinent information. The MPD will provide an update to Council in April 2025. (MCC 27-10; Government Code §§ 7070, 7071, and 7072, per AB 481) On September 30, 2021, California Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) was signed into law. California Government Code §§ 7070, 7071, and 7072 codify the requirements for law enforcement’s acquisition, use, and funding of “military equipment.” The bill required law enforcement agencies that seek to continue the use of military equipment to receive approval from their governing body.

On April 19, 2022, the Monterey Police Department provided a report and presentation and the Monterey City Council approved MPD Policy 706 – Military Equipment and the Military Equipment Inventory with Ordinance 3649.

Government Code § 7072 requires law enforcement agencies, to submit to their governing body an annual military equipment report for as long as the military equipment is available for use.

On April 18, 2023, the City Council renewed the Military Equipment Purchase and Use Ordinance – Monterey City Code § 27-10. This ordinance was approved each subsequent year in April.

On April 1, 2025 the City Council will review the Military Equipment Purchase and Use Ordinance – Monterey City Code § 27-10. Prior to the council presentation the MPD hosted a Town Hall Meeting on March 3, 2025.

MPD Policy 706 – Military Equipment and the 2024-2025 annual Military Equipment Report can be found on the MPD Website.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 22, Packet Page 124

2.POST BASIC COURSE ACADEMY
(6 MONTHS)
COURSES INCLUDE:

Leadership, Professionalism & Ethics; Criminal Justice System; Policing in the Community; Victimology/Crisis Intervention; Introduction to Criminal Law; Property Crimes; Crimes Against Persons/Death Investigations; General Crime Statutes; Crimes Against Children; Sex Crimes; Juvenile Law and Procedure; Controlled Substances; Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Law; Laws of Arrest; Search and Seizure; Presentation of Evidence; Investigative Report Writing; Vehicle Operations; Use of Force; Patrol Techniques; Vehicle Pullovers; Crimes in Progress; Handling Disputes/Crowd Control; Domestic Violence; Unusual Occurrences; Missing Persons; Traffic Enforcement; Traffic Collision Investigations; Crime Scenes, Evidence, and Forensics; Custody; Lifetime Fitness; Arrest and Control; First Aid, CPR, and AED; Firearms/Chemical Agents; Information Services; People with Disabilities; Gang Awareness; Crimes Against the Justice System; Weapons Violations; Hazardous Materials Awareness; Cultural Diversity/Discrimination; Emergency Management; Scenario Tests; and Comprehensive Tests

3. MPD FIELD TRAINING PROGRAM
(APPROXIMATELY 16 WEEKS)
(1) week orientation
Phase One – (4) weeks Field Training Officer (FTO) #1
Phase Two – (4) weeks FTO #2
Phase Three – (4) weeks FTO #3
Phase Four – (4) weeks FTO #1 (two weeks plain clothes) Daily Observation Reports (DOR) evaluations phase 1-4 completed by FTO Supervisor’s Weekly Report evaluations phase 1-4 – completed by FTO Sergeant

4. PROBATIONARY PERIOD
(18 MONTHS FROM BASIC COURSE ACADEMY)
Phase Five – Twice per month evaluations by Sergeant until one year point Phase Five – Monthly evaluations by Sergeant until completion of probation (18 months)

1.POLICE OFFICER SELECTION PROCESS
(APPROX. 60-90 DAYS)
Applicant submits an application, which includes: the POST Entry-level Law Enforcement Test Battery (PELLETB) Written Exam results and Work Sample Test Battery (WSTB) Physical Ability test results that are administered by police academies.

Monterey Human Resources and MPD staff schedule eligible candidates for an oralboard examination. The oral-board assesses: Experience; Problem Solving; Communication Skills; Interest/Motivation; Interpersonal Skills; and Community Involvement/Awareness.

If the candidate successfully passes the Oral-Board examination, a second oral interview is conducted with the candidate and MPD Command Staff.

Candidate Background Investigation (POST Background Investigation Manual) Candidates complete a Personal History Statement (PHS). The PHS is a 25-page questionnaire that is the basis for the background investigation regarding the candidate.

Fingerprints submitted to FBI and DOJ
Areas of investigation: Citizenship Verification; Age Verification; Criminal Records Checks – Local, State and National; Driving Record Check; Education Verification; Employment History Checks; Relatives/Personal References Checks; Dissolution of Marriage Check; Neighborhood Checks; Military History Check; Credit Records Check; Personal Information, Relatives and References, Education, Residence, Experience and Employment, Military Experience, Financial, Legal, Motor Vehicle Operation, Other Topics
Assessing: Integrity; Impulse Control/Attention to Safety; Substance Abuse and Other Risk-Taking Behavior; Stress Tolerance; Confronting and Overcoming Problems, Obstacles, and Adversity; Conscientiousness; Interpersonal Skills; Decision-Making and Judgment; Learning Ability; and Communication Skills.

Conditional Offer of Employment
Psychological Evaluation
Medical Evaluation
V. MPD OFFICER HIRING & TRAINING - AN OVERVIEW
20 MPD Annual Report 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 23, Packet Page 125 The MPD will make staffing the top priority (Patrol, Traffic Enforcement, Community Action Team, Investigations and Professional Staff) to provide services at the levels the community desires.

In November 2024, the Monterey Police Department was awarded a competitive grant from the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Hiring Program (CHP) to add two additional police officer positions, providing $83,333.33 a year for three years.

The MPD will proactively address crime issues.

In 2024 - the MPD responded to over 45,000 calls for service, booked over 1,000 arrests, issued over 1,500 citations, booked over 3,700 items of property, conducted over 4,000 foot patrols, administered NARCAN® for opioid overdoses 12 times, arrested 193 drunk drivers and worked over 8,100 overtime hours to include over 1,100 special event overtime hours.

During 2024, MPD Detectives were called out during non-business hours on 10 occasions and were assigned to conduct 272 investigations beyond what patrol officers investigate (death investigations, sexual assault, domestic violence, narcotics, firearm investigations, financial crimes investigations, other serious assault cases, etc.).

The MPD is part of the cannabis coordination efforts along with the City Manager’s Office and Planning Office, and will assist in regulating the (4) cannabis businesses that will be implemented in 2025.

The MPD will build on its success in outreach to the community through programs such as the community police academy, the CSO Intern Program, Coffee with a Cop, Active Shooter training and on-going attendance at community meetings.

In 2024 – the Community Action Team (CAT) attended 94 community meetings.

The MPD will utilize its comprehensive approach to addressing quality of life issues surrounding homelessness (CAT & MDOT).

In December 2023, the MPD hired a “Homeless Navigator” to assist those who are unhoused.

In 2024 – The MPD CAT/MDOT Team - abated over 500 illegal encampments, provided services to the unhoused 147 times and had services declined 154 times, made 111 arrests, issued 168 citations and conducted 169 bike patrol hours.

The MPD will plan for a new public safety building as the current campus was opened in the 1950s - over 65 years ago.

A public safety campus feasibility study was completed in 2023 and additional contingencies are being explored for updating the Police and Fire Public Safety Campus.

Gates for the exterior fence around the MPD campus have been engineered and funded and will be installed in mid-2025.

The MPD will utilize, improve and leverage technological advances.

In February 2024, the new cloud-based Mark 43 Records Management System (RMS) was implemented after a two-year process. This included a Crossroads collision reporting application and automated citation system, a new M43 jail application, state and federally mandated NIBRS/CIBRS reporting compliance, and improved analytic capabilities.

Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) technology was approved and implemented in 2024.

The MPD will ensure the highest standards of professionalism through training, succession planning and officer safety & wellness (POST standards, professional organizations and training, CIT, ICAT, RISE).

The MPD will build trust & legitimacy; review & improve policy; utilize & enhance technology and social media; build strong community policing relationships & address crime issues; focus on contemporary training & education and officer wellness & safety.

VI. MPD ACCOMPLISHMENTS / PRIORITIES 2024 & 2025
21 MPD Annual Report 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 24, Packet Page 126

LINE OF DUTY DEATHS
VII. WE WILL NEVER FORGET

OFFICER JAMES EDWARD COLLARD

SERGEANT DONALD HERBERT LANSING

OFFICER AMY ROGERS ALLEN RODRIGUEZ

SERGEANT DOUGLAS CHARLES HOLLEY
On April 20, 1969, Officer Collard was assigned to the
Traffic Division and working day shift on a police
motorcycle. He and Traffic Officer Allen Davidson
overheard a radio call of a boat in trouble in the water in front of the Monterey Beach Hotel. They were relatively close and they elected to respond. Upon Arrival they
found a boat had overturned in the water and there were several people needing immediate assistance in the water.

Officer Collard and Officer Davidson took off their belts and safety equipment and fearlessly dove into the water to rescue the victims. Tragically, Officer Collard
drowned. Officer Collard was the second Monterey Police Officer to die in the line of duty.

On May 4, 1971, Sergeant Lansing was attending a
scheduled department-wide shoot at the Fort Ord
military base. He left the range in his private vehicle, however was still on duty. While on Fort Ord property,
a large military truck accidentally struck Sergeant
Lansing's vehicle killing him instantly. Many of his
fellow officers and friends, who were also leaving the
firing range, came upon this tragic accident and
discovered that Sergeant Lansing had been killed.

Sergeant Lansing was the third Monterey Police Officer
killed in the line of duty.

Officer Amy Allen Rodriguez passed away on Monday,
April 4, 2016 after battling cancer for over a year. Amy was a fifteen year veteran of the Monterey Police
Department (MPD), being hired by the MPD in August
2000. During her tenure with the MPD, Officer Rodriguez selflessly touched thousands of people who lived, worked and visited Monterey while she was assigned as a patrol officer, detective and Field Training Officer.

Sergeant Doug Holley passed away on Friday, October
27, 2017 after battling cancer for several years. Doug
was a five year veteran of the Monterey Police
Department (MPD), being hired by the MPD in September
2012. Prior to becoming part of the MPD family, Doug
worked for the Stockton Police Department for over
seventeen years as an officer and sergeant assigned to
various assignments including patrol, gang investigations and SWAT. During his tenure with the MPD, Sergeant
Holley served the community of Monterey while he was
assigned as a patrol officer, Community Action Team
officer and a sergeant.

ALWAYS IN OUR HEARTS
22 MPD Annual Report 2024

OFFICER HONORE EDWIN PYBURN
On January 1, 1925, at approximately 0100 hours,
Officer Pyburn was responding to a disturbance. He
jumped onto the running board of a patrol vehicle driven by Officer Harry Elasho. As Officer Elasho rounded the
corner at Alvarado and Franklin, Officer Pyburn slipped from the running board and fell to the ground striking his head. He was transported to the hospital where he
succumbed to his injuries. Officer Pyburn was an Army
veteran who had worked as an MPD officer for a little
over a year. Officer Pyburn was the first Monterey Police Officer killed in the line of duty (special thanks to retired MPD Officer Adam Costa for researching this in 2024).

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 12., Item Page 25, Packet Page 127 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: David J. Hober, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Receive Annual Report of the Police Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) System (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council Receive the Monterey Police
Department (MPD) Annual Report of the Police
Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) System.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing;
and maintaining a safe environment.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Receiving the Monterey Police Department Annual
Report of the Police Automated License Plate
Recognition (ALPR) System is consistent with the City
Council’s Value Driver and Quality of Life Strategic
Priorities: Recognize that public safety is a priority to ensure that our City is safe and welcoming to all,
contributing to our economic vitality as a destination
City; Drive innovation through technology and business
solutions that enhance productivity and effectiveness
for staff, as well as customer service for the public;
transparent and inclusive government – foster a local
government that is transparent and collaborative; and
solicits, welcomes and appreciates input from all.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

Agenda Report Highlights
 The Monterey Police Department
(MPD) has implemented an
Automated License Plate
Recognition (ALPR) system to
enhance public safety and improve
crime-solving efficiency.
 The ALPR system includes 34
active stationary cameras, with 5
more pending installation, and 15
mobile cameras in patrol vehicles.
 MPD shares its camera network
with six local agencies and can
access 306 ALPR networks across
California.
 Several successful criminal
investigations have been aided by
the ALPR system, including vehicle
recoveries, criminal threats, elder
abuse, and burglary arrests.
 The ALPR system audit confirmed
compliance with the ALPR policy to
ensure accountability and proper
use of ALPR data.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 13.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 1, Packet Page 128 №10/24
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Receiving the Annual Report of the Police Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) system carries no fiscal impacts. Procurement of the system and on-going annual costs were approved through Council Action on September 17, 2024, Resolution No. 24-148.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The presentation of the Annual Report of the Police Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) system is conducted at the direction of Council which was provided during the April 2, 2024 as follows: that the audit report be shared with the City Attorney by the Police Chief after a year into the program; that any changes to the policy be brought to the City Council; and that the Police Chief bring a report to Council a year into the program. However, it remains within the Council's discretion to decline acceptance of the report.

DISCUSSION:

On April 2, 2024, council directed that the Monterey Police Department proceed with the implementation of an Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) program; that the ALPR audit report be shared with the City Attorney by the Police Chief after a year into the program; that any changes to the policy be brought to the City Council for approval; and that the Police Chief bring an ALPR report to Council a year into the program. On September 17, 2024, Council approved procurement and on-going funding of the Flock Group, Inc., Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) system.

The Monterey Police Department (MPD) has (34) active stationary cameras with (5) stationary cameras pending installation for a total of (39) stationary cameras and 15 mobile ALPR cameras in marked patrol vehicles. Monterey PD has a signed MOU and is currently sharing its camera network with (6) agencies; Carmel PD, Marina PD, Monterey District CA State Parks, Cal Fire, Seaside PD, and Watsonville PD. The MPD is able to access (306) ALPR networks across the state. The MPD does not share data outside the state or with the federal government.

The inaugural ALPR Annual Report encompasses the two-month period from December 12, 2024, when the system became operational, through February 28, 2025. Presenting the ALPR report in April ensures alignment with the Annual Military Equipment Report, which is also delivered each April. Additionally, the MPD Annual Report will be presented during the same timeframe. As a result, all three reports will be provided simultaneously, offering a Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 2, Packet Page 129 №10/24
comprehensive overview. The subsequent Annual Report for the Police ALPR system will cover the full calendar year, from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025.

This report serves to comply with the three directions of Council related to the Police Department ALPR Annual review:
 That any changes to the policy be brought to the City Council  That the Police Chief bring a report to Council a year into the program  That the MPD Audit Report has been completed and shared with the City Attorney a year into the program.

There are three changes being made to Monterey Police Department Policy 433 – Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs), two of which are to memorialize the direction of Council on April 2, 2024 and one to clarify documentation.
 Section 433.4.1 ALPR Administrator adds a section titled “Annual Reporting” which refers to annual reporting and policy changes.
 Section 433.7 Accountability, adjusts section (g) to clarify that a case number or incident number will be documented unless there are extenuating circumstances.  Section 433.8 ALPR Data Audits, adds a section that refers to the audit memorandum being provided to and reviewed by the City Attorney.

A Police Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) system audit was conducted for the period of 12-12-24 to 02-18-25 and provided to the City Attorney for review. The audit related that the system was being used in compliance with the policy, but suggested Policy Section 433.7(g) “accountability” be adjusted as described to ensure that a reason for an inquiry is only listed when, due to extenuating circumstances, a case or incident number is not available.

The following are some examples of criminal investigations that were aided by utilizing the ALPR system:
 1-1-25 - MPD recovered a stolen vehicle on Johnson Street.  1-6-25 – MPD investigated criminal threats at Wave Street and Cannery Row.  1-14-25 - MPD investigated elder abuse and battery after a physical altercation between two subjects.
 2-6-25 - MPD arrested a suspect in possession of a stolen truck in the 900 block of Lighthouse.
 2-18-25 - MPD arrested two subjects for burglary of a residence.  2-24-25 - MPD arrested two subjects for burglarizing two businesses of ATMs on the peninsula and possession of an assault rifle.

The successful implementation of Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR) has significantly enhanced the Monterey Police Department's ability to ensure public safety and improve crimesolving efficiency. By providing real-time data and critical investigative leads, ALPR technology has proven to be an invaluable tool in addressing criminal activity and recovering stolen property. The continued use and refinement of this technology demonstrate the City’s commitment to leveraging innovative solutions to maintain a safe and secure community for all residents and visitors.

DJH
Attachments: 1. DRAFT MPD Policy 433 – Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 3, Packet Page 130 №10/24
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 4, Packet Page 131 Policy
433
Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/03/21, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 1 Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
433.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for the capture, storage and use of digital data obtained through the use of Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) technology. 433.2 DEFINITIONS
• Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR): A device that uses cameras and computer technology to capture images of vehicle license plates and other vehicle data in order to identify and compare those captured digital images to lists of license plate numbers associated with Vehicles of Interest (as identified below). • ALPR Operator: A trained Department member authorized to utilize ALPR system/ equipment. ALPR operators may be assigned to positions identified in section 433.4.1(a) of this policy, and the ALPR Administrator may order the deployment of the ALPR systems for use in legitimate law enforcement efforts. • ALPR Administrator: The Investigations/Administrative Division Commander serves as the ALPR Administrator for the Department.
• Hot List: A list of license plates associated with Vehicles of Interest compiled from one or more databases including, but not limited to, NCIC, CA DMV, Local BOLO's, etc. • Vehicles of Interest: Including, but not limited to vehicles reported as stolen; vehicles displaying stolen license plates or tags; vehicles linked to missing and/or wanted persons and vehicles flagged by the Department of Motor Vehicles or law enforcement agencies.
• Detection: Data obtained by an ALPR of an image (such as a license plate) within public view that was read by the device, including potential images (such as the plate and description of vehicle on which it was displayed), and information regarding the location of the ALPR system at the time of the ALPR's read. • Hit: Alert from the ALPR system that a scanned license plate number may be in the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) or other law enforcement database for a specific reason including, but not limited to, being related to a stolen car, wanted person, missing person, domestic violation protective order, involved in a crime, or terrorist-related activity.
433.3 POLICY
The policy of the Monterey Police Department is to utilize ALPR technology to capture and store digital license plate data and images while recognizing the established privacy rights of the public.

All data and images gathered by the ALPR are for the official use of this department. Because such data may contain confidential information, it is not subject to public disclosure unless required by law.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 5, Packet Page 132 Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/03/21, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 2 433.4 ADMINISTRATION
The ALPR technology, also known as License Plate Recognition (LPR), allows for the automated detection of license plates along with the vehicle make, model, color, and unique identifiers through the Monterey Police Department's ALPR system and vehicle identification technology. It is used by the Monterey Police Department to convert data associated with vehicle license plates and vehicle descriptions for official law enforcement purposes, including but not limited to identifying stolen or wanted vehicles, stolen license plates and missing persons. It may also be used to gather information related to active warrants, homeland security, plot movement of wanted suspects , suspect interdiction and stolen property recovery.

All installation and maintenance of ALPR equipment, as well as ALPR data retention and access, shall be managed by the ALPR Administrator. The ALPR Administrator will assign members under their command to administer the day-to-day operation of the ALPR equipment and data. 433.4.1 ALPR ADMINISTRATOR
The Administration Division Commander shall be assigned the role of ALPR Administrator and is responsible for ensuring compliance with the requirements of Civil Code § 1798.90.5 et seq. This includes, but is not limited to Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53:
(a) Only properly trained and specifically authorized Department members (sworn officers, analysts, police service technicians, police service assistants and community service officers) with an operational need to utilize the system are authorized to use or access the ALPR system or to collect ALPR information. (b) Ensuring that specific training requirements are established and that authorized users complete such training.
(c) Ensuring the security of the information and compliance with applicable privacy laws. (d) Ensuring that procedures are followed for system operators and maintaining records of access in compliance with Civil Code § 1798.90.52.
(e) Maintaining a list of the job title or other designation of the employees who are authorized to access and use ALPR information.
(f) Working with the Custodian of Records on the retention and destruction of ALPR data. (g) Ensuring this policy and related procedures are conspicuously posted on the department's website.

Annual Reporting - within one year of approval of the MPD ALPR system, and annually thereafter, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee will present an ALPR report to City Council related to the ALPR system, to include changes to the policy.
433.5 OPERATIONS
Use of an ALPR is restricted to the purposes outlined below. Department members shall not use, or allow others to use the equipment or database records for any unauthorized purpose (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53).
(a) An ALPR shall only be used for official law enforcement business.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 6, Packet Page 133 Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/03/21, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 3 (b) An ALPR may be used in conjunction with any routine patrol operation or criminal investigation. Reasonable suspicion or probable cause is not required before using an ALPR.
(c) While an ALPR may be used to canvass license plates around any crime scene, particular consideration should be given to using ALPR-equipped cars to canvass areas around homicides, shootings and other major incidents. Partial license plates reported during major crimes should be entered into the ALPR system in an attempt to identify suspect vehicles.
(d) No member of this department shall operate ALPR equipment or access ALPR data without first completing department-approved training.
(e) No ALPR operator may access department, state or federal data unless otherwise authorized to do so.
(f) The officer will verify an ALPR response through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) or dispatch before taking enforcement action that is based solely on an ALPR alert.
(g) Login/Log-Out Procedure. To ensure proper operation and facilitate oversight of the ALPR system, all users will be required to have individual credentials for access and use of the systems and/or data, which has the ability to be fully audited. (h) Permitted/Impermissible Uses. The ALPR system, and all data collected, is the property of the Monterey Police Department. Department personnel may only access and use the ALPR system for official and legitimate law enforcement purposes consistent with this Policy. The following uses of the ALPR system are specifically prohibited:

1. Invasion of Privacy: Except when done pursuant to a court order such as a search warrant, it is a violation of this policy to utilize the ALPR to record license plates except those of vehicles that are exposed to public view (e.g., vehicles on a public road or street, or that are on private property but whose license plate(s) are visible from a public road, street, or a place to which members of the public have access, such as the parking lot of a shop or other business establishment).

2. Harassment or Intimidation: It is a violation of this policy to use the ALPR system to harass and/or intimidate any individual or group.

3. Use Based on a Protected Characteristic. It is a violation of this policy to use the ALPR system or associated scan files or Hot Lists solely because of a person's, or group's race, gender, religion, political affiliation, nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, or other classification protected by law.

4. Personal Use: It is a violation of this policy to use the ALPR system or associated scan files or Hot Lists for any personal purpose.

5. First Amendment Rights. It is a violation of this policy to use the ALPR system or associated scan files or Hot Lists for the purpose or effect of infringing upon First Amendment rights.

Anyone who engages in an impermissible use of the ALPR system or associated scan files or Hot Lists may be subject to; criminal prosecution, civil liability, and/or administrative sanctions, ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 7, Packet Page 134 Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/03/21, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 4 up to and including termination, pursuant to and consistent with the relevant collective bargaining agreements and City and Department policies.
433.5.1 ALPR ALERT PROTOCOLS
Once an alert is received, the operator will confirm that the observed license plate from the system matches the license plate for the observed vehicle. Before any law enforcement action is taken because of an ALPR alert, the alert will be verified through a CLETS inquiry via MDC or through Dispatch.

Officers will not take any police action that restricts the freedom of any individual based solely on an ALPR alert unless it has been validated. Because the ALPR alert may relate to a vehicle and may not relate to the person operating the vehicle, officers are reminded that they need to have reasonable suspicion and/or probable cause to make an enforcement stop of any vehicle. (For example, if a vehicle is entered into the system because of its association with a wanted individual, officers should attempt to visually match the driver to the description of the wanted subject prior to making the stop or should have another legal basis for making the stop.) Hot Lists. Designation of Hot Lists to be utilized by the ALPR system shall be made by the ALPR Administrator or his/her designee. Hot lists shall be obtained or compiled from sources as may be consistent with the purposes of the ALPR system set forth in this policy. Hot Lists utilized by the Department's ALPR system may be updated by agency sources more frequently than the Department may be uploading them and thus the Department's ALPR system will not have access to real time data. Occasionally, there may be errors in the ALPR system's read of a license plate.

Therefore, an alert alone shall not be a basis for police action (other than following the Vehicle of Interest).

Prior to initiation of a stop of a vehicle or other intervention based on an alert, Department members shall undertake the following:
(a) Verification of status on a Hot List. An officer must receive confirmation, from Communications or other department computer device, that the license plate is still stolen, wanted, or otherwise of interest before proceeding (absent exigent circumstances).
(b) Visual verification of license plate number. Officers shall visually verify that the license plate of interest matches identically with the image of the license plate number captured (read) by the ALPR, including both the alphanumeric characters of the license plate, state of issue, and vehicle descriptors before proceeding. (c) Department members alerted to the fact that an observed motor vehicle's license plate is entered as a Hot Plate (hit) in a specific BOLO (Be On The Lookout) list are required to make a reasonable effort to confirm that a wanted person is actually in the vehicle and/or that a reasonable basis exists before a Department member would have a lawful basis to stop the vehicle.

Department members will clear all vehicle stops from Hot List alerts by indicating the positive ALPR Hit, i.e., with an arrest or other enforcement action. If it is not obvious in the text of the call as to the correlation of the ALPR Hit and the arrest, then the Department member shall update ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 8, Packet Page 135 Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/03/21, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 5 Communications and the original person and/or the system administrator inputting the vehicle in the Hot List (hit).

General Hot Lists (Stolen Vehicle System - SVS, Felony Wanted Vehicles - SFR, and Lost or Stolen License Plates - SLR) will be automatically downloaded into the ALPR system a minimum of once a day with the most current data overwriting the old data.

All entries and updates of specific Hot Lists within the ALPR system will be documented by the requesting Department member within the appropriate general offense report. As such, specific Hot Lists shall be approved by the ALPR Administrator (or designee) before initial entry within the ALPR system. The updating of such a list within the ALPR system shall thereafter be accomplished pursuant to the approval of the Department member's immediate supervisor. The hits from these data sources should be viewed as informational, created solely to bring the officers attention to specific vehicles that are suspected to have been associated with criminal activity.

All Hot List license plate numbers and suspect information entered into the ALPR system will contain the following information as a minimum:
• Entering Department member's name
• Related case number
• Short synopsis describing the nature of the originating call In the event the suspect vehicle or an occupant commits a violation of the law then the vehicle can be stopped or the occupants detained as in any other lawful stop or arrest.

When an ALPR alerts on a stolen vehicle for a non-sworn professional staff member, the employee shall pull over in a safe location and use the radio to alert an officer to the vehicle's location. At no time shall a professional staff member take any action with the vehicle or any occupants. 433.6 DATA COLLECTION AND RETENTION
The Administration Division Commander is responsible for ensuring systems and processes are in place for the proper collection and retention of ALPR data.

All non-evidentiary ALPR data and license plate information records, not associated with any case report, investigation, complaint or citation, shall be downloaded to the server or cloud and stored for a maximum of 30 days. Thereafter, it shall be entirely purged from all active and backup systems. Evidentiary ALPR data shall be tagged with a case report or citation number and be retained for the same length of time as other evidence relevant to the case in accordance with the Records Retention Schedule.

The ALPR 3rd party vendor will store the data (data hosting) and ensure proper maintenance and security of data stored in their data towers. The ALPR vendor will purge their data at the end of the 30 days of storage. However, this will not preclude the Monterey Police Department from maintaining any relevant vehicle data obtained from the system after that period pursuant to the retention period set forth above for evidentiary and non-evidentiary data. Relevant vehicle data are scans corresponding to the Vehicle of Interest on a Hot List.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 9, Packet Page 136 Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/03/21, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 6 Restrictions on use of ALPR Data: Information gathered or collected, and records retained by ALPR cameras or any other MPD ALPR system will not be sold, accessed, or used for any purpose other than legitimate law enforcement or public safety purposes. The release of necessary data to the City's authorized 3rd party vendor or to towing services shall not be considered the sale, sharing, or transferring of ALPR information.
433.7 ACCOUNTABILITY
All data will be closely safeguarded and protected by both procedural and technological means.

The Monterey Police Department will observe the following safeguards regarding access to and use of stored data (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53):
(a) All ALPR data downloaded to the mobile workstation and in storage shall be accessible only through a login/password-protected system capable of documenting all access of information by name, date and time (Civil Code § 1798.90.52). (b) All access to ALPR will be maintained in an audit trail, including the date and time the information was accessed, the license plate number or other data used to query the system, the username of the person who accessed the information and the purpose for accessing the information.
(c) Members approved to access ALPR data under these guidelines are permitted to access the data for legitimate law enforcement purposes only, such as when the data relate to a specific criminal investigation or department-related civil or administrative action.
(d) All non-law enforcement requests for access to stored ALPR data shall be referred to Administration Division Commander and processed in accordance with applicable law. (e) Such ALPR data may only be released to other authorized and verified law enforcement officials and agencies for legitimate law enforcement purposes consistent with the law and these policies.
(f) No entry of "Hot Lists" or other data may be entered in to the ALPR database without supervisor approval.
(g) Every ALPR Detection Browsing Inquiry must be documented by either the associated with the associated Monterey Police Department case number or incident number.

A specific reason for the inquiry will only be entered when, due to /or a reason for the inquiry. only for extenuating circumstances, reasons wherein a there is no case or incident number is not available, a specific reason for the inquiry.

For security or data breaches, see the Records Release and Maintenance Policy. 433.8 ALPR DATA AUDITS
It is the responsibility of the Administration Division Commander or designee to ensure that an audit is conducted of ALPR detection browsing inquiries at least once during each calendar year.

The Department will audit a sampling of the ALPR system utilization from the prior 12-month period to verify proper use in accordance with the above-authorized uses. The audit shall randomly select at least 10 detection browsing inquiries conducted by department employees during the ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 10, Packet Page 137 Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs)
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/03/21, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department ***DRAFT*** Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) - 7 preceding twelve-month period and determine if each inquiry meets the requirements established in the "Accountability" policy section.

The audit shall be documented in the form of an internal department memorandum to the Chief of Police. The memorandum shall include any data errors found so that such errors can be corrected.

After review by the Chief of Police, the memorandum will be forwarded and reviewed by the City Attorney. The memorandum and any associated documentation shall be filed and retained by the Administration Division Commander.
433.9 RELEASING ALPR DATA
The ALPR data may be shared only with other law enforcement or prosecutorial agencies for official law enforcement purposes or as otherwise permitted by law, using the following procedures:
(a) The agency makes a written request for the ALPR data that includes:

1. The name of the agency.

2. The name of the person requesting.

3. The intended purpose of obtaining the information.
(b) The request is reviewed by the Administration Division Commander or the authorized designee and approved before the request is fulfilled.
(c) The Administration Division Commander or the authorized designee will consider the California Values Act (Government Code § 7282.5; Government Code § 7284.2 et seq), before approving the release of ALPR data. The Monterey Police Department does not permit the sharing of ALPR data gathered by the City or its contractors/subcontractors for purpose of federal immigration enforcement, these federal immigration agencies include Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Patrol (CPB). The MPD will not share ALPR information with out-of-state or federal agencies, including out-of-state and federal law enforcement agencies. Nor will ALPR data be shared with any law enforcement agency for the purposes of enforcing prohibitions on reproductive or gender-affirming care. (d) The approved request is retained on file.

Requests for ALPR data by non-law enforcement or non-prosecutorial agencies will be processed as provided in the Records Maintenance and Release Policy (Civil Code § 1798.90.55). 433.10 TRAINING
The Personnel/IA Sergeant (Training) shall ensure that members receive department-approved training for those authorized to use or access the ALPR system (Civil Code § 1798.90.51; Civil Code § 1798.90.53). That training shall at a minimum review this Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Policy.

ATTACHMENT 1
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 11, Packet Page 138 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: David J. Hober, Chief of Police
Prepared By: Michael Bruno, Assistant Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Receive Annual Report and Renew the Military Equipment Purchase and Use Ordinance – Monterey City Code, Chapter 27, Article 3, Section 27-10, and Authorize the Acquisition of Additional Military Equipment Including a Crisis Negotiating Team Command Vehicle, Four Unmanned Aerial Systems, and Replace Eight Patrol Rifles (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council find that the military equipment
identified in the Monterey Police Department’s Annual
Military Equipment Report has complied with the
standards for approval set forth in the Military Equipment Use Policy; MPD Policy 706 – Military Equipment and the Military Equipment Inventory and renew the Military
Equipment Purchase and Use Ordinance – Monterey
City Code, Chapter 27, Article 3, Section 27-10. Also, to authorize the purchase of additional military equipment, including a Crisis Negotiating Team Command vehicle,
replace eight patrol rifles, and four Unmanned Aerial
Systems (UAS).

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Develop and retain a quality workforce by providing
sufficient resources and support to develop, retain, and recruit a high-quality city workforce.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Renewing an ordinance in compliance with state
legislation related to the City’s Police Department
acquisition and use of military equipment and the related MPD policy is consistent with the City Council’s Value
Driver and Quality of Life Strategic Priorities: Recognize that public safety is a priority to ensure that our City is Agenda Report Highlights
 City Council approval is sought to
renew the Military Equipment
Purchase and Use Ordinance and
authorize the acquisition of
additional military equipment,
including a Crisis Negotiating Team
Command vehicle, four Unmanned
Aerial Systems (UAS), and
replacement of eight patrol rifles.
 The proposed equipment aims to
enhance public safety, protect law
enforcement personnel, and
improve the department's ability to
respond to critical incidents.
 The equipment acquisition complies
with California Assembly Bill 481,
which mandates transparency,
accountability, and public
participation in the funding,
acquisition, and use of military
equipment by law enforcement.
 The Police Department held a
Community Town Hall to inform and
engage the public about the
proposed equipment acquisition.

Date: 4/1/2025
Item No.: 14.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 1, Packet Page 139 №10/24
safe and welcoming to all, contributing to our economic vitality as a destination City; prepare for emergencies and community resiliency; recognize that our workforce is our greatest resource for providing the service that our community deserves by providing city staff with the tools, resources, coaching, and feedback they need to perform well.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The financial considerations are listed in the attached Monterey Police Department Annual Military Equipment Report (May 2024 to May 2025), in initial and annual costs. All of these costs are funded through the existing police budget. Additionally, the MPD requests authorization to replace eight (8) patrol rifles, with an initial cost of $21,100, and ongoing annual costs of approximately $1,500; and purchase four (4) Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), with an initial cost of approximately $25,000 - $30,000, and ongoing annual costs of approximately $500. This equipment will be funded through the existing police budget. The purchase of the Crisis Negotiating Team Command Vehicle is being funded through the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) grant which is administered by the City and County of San Francisco. The grant process timeline is extensive and the CNT Command Vehicle has previously been approved by Council on 04-19-22 - Ordinance 3649; 04-18-23 - Resolution 23-046; and 04-16- 24 - Resolution 24-053. The City of Monterey has an Agreement with the City and County of San Francisco for the Distribution of FY 2023 UASI Grant Funds for this project (Ag-11813) through a reimbursement process once the vehicle is delivered.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Without Council approval, the Police Department’s ability to respond to critical incidents would be greatly diminished and would be detrimental to the safety of the public, involved parties, and public safety officers, and would increase the City’s risk exposure.

DISCUSSION:

On September 30, 2021, California Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) was signed into law. California Government Code §§ 7070, 7071, and 7072 codify the requirements established by AB 481 for law enforcement’s acquisition, use, and funding of “military equipment.” The information presented in this agenda report explains the Police Department’s compliance with the requirements of AB 481.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 2, Packet Page 140 №10/24
Initial approval – April 19, 2022
In enacting AB 481, the Legislature stated that the public has a right to know about any funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment by state or local government officials to increase transparency, accountability, and oversight. The same applies to the public’s right to participate in any government agency’s decision to fund, acquire, or use such equipment.

The bill required law enforcement agencies that seek to continue the use of military equipment acquired prior to January 1, 2022, to receive approval from their governing body prior to May 1, 2022.

On April 19, 2022, the Monterey Police Department provided a council report and presentation related to Assembly Bill 481, MPD Policy 706 – Military Equipment and requested the creation of the Military Use and Purchase Ordinance. The Monterey City Council approved MPD Policy 706 – Military Equipment and the Military Equipment Inventory with Ordinance 3649 on April 19, 2022.

Annual Military Equipment Report – Every Year in April
Government Code § 7072 requires law enforcement agencies that received approval for their military equipment use policy, to submit to their governing body an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use.

The governing body shall annually review the Military Equipment Purchase and Use Ordinance and vote on whether to renew the ordinance at a regular meeting. During its review, the governing body shall consider the annual report and determine whether each type of military equipment has complied with specified standards for approval. Specifically, pursuant to Government Code section 7071(e)(2), the City Council may only approve the renewal of the ordinance if it determines:
(1) The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. (2) The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
(3) If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. (4) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

May 2022 and Each Subsequent Year
The City Council renewed the Military Equipment Purchase and Use Ordinance – Monterey City Code, Chapter 27, Article 3, Section 27-10 in April 2022 and each subsequent year.

May 2024 to May 2025
The Monterey Police Department’s Annual Military Equipment Report (May 2024 to May 2025) is attachment 3 to this Agenda.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 3, Packet Page 141 №10/24
Prior to the presentation for this year’s report, the Monterey Police Department held a Community Town Hall on March 3, 2025 at 6pm at the Monterey City Council Chamber to offer an additional opportunity for the community to be informed about this topic. The Town Hall meeting was streamed online via Zoom and through AMP. The meeting was advertised through a media release to all local media outlets, the City and the police department’s website, and the department’s social media accounts.

One (1) member from the community attended in person and two (2) attended online via Zoom.

The community member in the council chamber made a comment at the end of the presentation. She related she was in favor of the crisis negotiating team command vehicle given the recent critical incident in the City of Carmel. She also related she supported the replacement of the eight patrol rifles. None of the online viewers spoke.

Background Information Related to the Equipment
The primary purpose of all equipment purchased by the Police Department is to save civilian lives, protect law enforcement personnel, reduce the risk for the City and enhance public safety.

Some of the items designated by AB 481 as “military equipment” have been in our Police Department’s equipment inventory for many years. Monterey Police Department policies and procedures govern the use, safe handling, storage, and qualification of the specified equipment.

Much of the equipment is part of the de-escalation process of Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics (ICAT), which involves continuously evaluating the situation to attempt other techniques. The equipment may be used to create cover and distance and allow more time for decision-making processes. This allows the use of less-lethal tactics as part of a range of options to resolve a critical incident without using deadly force. These things allow officers to take in and constantly evaluate the totality of the circumstances, resulting in increased safety and reduced risk for everyone involved.

In addition, the California Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) requirements for the operation and deployment of this equipment are managed by the Police Department’s Training Unit. As new tools are deployed, POST, internal training, vendor-provided training, or crosstraining among surrounding law enforcement agencies are implemented appropriately.

The MPD has leveraged federal and state grants and asset forfeiture programs through programs such as the Bullet Proof Vest Grant, Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant, Citizens’ Option for Public Safety Grant, State Homeland Security Grant, Urban Areas Security Initiative Grant, etc. to acquire the equipment described. The federal government also offers what is commonly known as the “1033 Program” to provide surplus military equipment to law enforcement agencies. That being said, the MPD has not applied for or received designated military equipment through the 1033 Program and it does not possess any equipment that it has obtained from the military. Regardless, some of MPD’s equipment qualifies as “military equipment” under the broad language of the 16 categories defined by Government Code § 7070.

Monterey Police Department Policy 706 - Military Equipment The Police Department’s policy manual (structured on the Lexipol policy manual framework) addresses the appropriate use and deployment of military equipment. Specifically, MPD Policy 706 – Military Equipment addresses the required parameters of the law. AB 481 requires law enforcement to publicly release a written policy document governing the use of military Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 4, Packet Page 142 №10/24
equipment. The Monterey City Council approved MPD Policy 706 by way of Monterey City Ordinance 3649 and the policy is posted on the Police Department’s webpage.

The approved Military Equipment Use Policy (Policy 706 – Military Equipment) is attachment 2 to this report. This policy includes an inventory of all qualifying equipment as an attachment, divided into three sections and described in more detail below:

Section One – Qualifying equipment owned/utilized by the Monterey Police Department. (California Government Code § 7070(c))
Section Two – Qualifying equipment owned/utilized by law enforcement agencies the MPD collaborates and/or participates with as part of the regional Monterey Peninsula Special Response Unit (MPRSRU). (California Government Code § 7071(a)(1)(d)) Section Three – Qualifying equipment that the MPD will be procuring if authorized. (California Government Code § 7071(a)(6))
This year, the MPD requests approval to procure the following:
 Category 10 – Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including assault weapons as defined in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard issue service weapons and ammunition of less than .50 caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a state agency:
o Request: to purchase eight (8) Colt semi-automatic patrol rifles and accessories (optic, sling, flashlight) to replace eight (8) 20-year-old patrol rifles. o Funding: the semi-automatic rifles will be funded using the existing MPD approved budget at an approximate total cost of $21,100. o Purposes and authorized use: Officers may deploy the patrol rifle in any circumstance where the officer can articulate a reasonable expectation that the rifle may be needed. Examples of some general guidelines for deploying the patrol rifle may include but are not limited to: (1) Situations where the member reasonably anticipates an armed encounter, (2) When a member is faced with a situation that may require accurate and effective fire at long range, (3) Situations where a member reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect’s firepower, (4) When a member reasonably believes that there may be a need to fire on a barricaded person or a person with a hostage, (5) When a member reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor. (6) When authorized or requested by a supervisor, (7) When needed to euthanize an animal.
o Rules that govern use: California Penal Code 33220(b), all other applicable State, Federal, and Local laws governing short-barreled rifles and police use of force. MPD Policies 300 – Use of Force, 306 – Firearms, 412 – Rapid Response and Deployment.
o Required training: California POST certified 16-hour patrol rifle course and 4 hours annually / qualification annually.
 Category 1 – Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles:
o Request: to purchase four (4) unmanned aircraft systems, also known as drones. One (1) UAS, a Skydio X10 or drone with similar specifications, and three (3) DJI Avata 2s or drone with similar specifications.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 5, Packet Page 143 №10/24
o Funding: the unmanned aircraft systems will be funded using the existing MPD approved budget at an approximate total cost between $25,000 - $30,000. o Purposes and authorized use: To enhance the safety of potentially dangerous situations by providing first responders with the ability to monitor video feed from UAS cameras of hazardous areas prior to, or in lieu of, sending in personnel.

UAS/Drone/Aerial platforms may be used for search and rescue; suspect apprehension, crime scene documentation; tactical operations; scene security; hazard monitoring; identification and mitigation; response to emergency calls; crisis communications; and legally authorized surveillance. o Rules that govern use: applicable state and federal laws and MPD Policy 606 – Unmanned Aerial System Operations.
o Required training: Prior to piloting any UAS/Drone staff members must secure an FAA Remote Pilot License (Part 107) and complete training required by FAA COA. Program Supervisor(s) and Commander(s) will attend a California P.O.S.T. UAS Operators Course (48 hours). UAS Pilots will attend a California P.O.S.T. UAS Basic Pilots Course (32 hours). All members of the UAS Team will attend the California POST approved FAA 107 Ground School (8 hours).  Category 5 - Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units – Crisis Negotiation Team Command Vehicle.
o Request - The regional MPRSRU Crisis Negotiations Team needs a mobile Negotiations Operations Center in a constant state of operational readiness to aid in the resolution of crisis incidents. The vehicle is currently being built and the anticipated delivery is anticipated to be in the summer of 2025. The MPD needs approval from the Council to procure this piece of military equipment. (Already approved by Council in 2022 2023, and 2024)
o Costs - $200,000 reimbursed through the UASI Grant. The vehicle would be procured with City of Monterey funds in FY 26 and fully reimbursed through the UASI grant program. This grant has been approved through UASI. o Purposes and authorized use: This vehicle will provide a designated Negotiations Operations Center (NOC) in a constant state of operational readiness for the MPRSRU Crisis Negotiations Team that will aid in the resolution of crisis incidents. It would also be utilized for community outreach events such as National Night Out, public safety outreach, etc. o Rules that govern use: MPD Policy 404 – Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit.
o Required training: MPRSRU CNT provides internal training for staff members prior to allowing them to operate these vehicles. All MPRSRU CNT members are required to complete an initial POST certified 40-hour basic Hostage Negotiation course and 48 hours of annual training.

Monterey Police Department Annual Military Equipment Report (May 2024 to May 2025) The Monterey Police Department Annual Military Equipment Report (May 2024 to May 2025) is attachment 3 to this report. This report includes an inventory of all qualifying military equipment as an attachment which mirrors the inventory in MPD Policy 706 – Military Equipment, but expands to report about the previous year, as described below.

Annually, the Police Department will prepare and present to the City Council an annual Military Equipment report and post it on the Police Department’s website within 30 days of the City Council meeting, where the following items are reviewed:

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 6, Packet Page 144 №10/24
 The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment as of the date of the annual report;
 Summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use;  Summary of any concerns or complaints received involving the use of military equipment;
 The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response;  Total annual cost of each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs; and,  Acquisition plans (including the source of funds) for the coming year, type, and quantity.

DJH/mb
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. MPD Policy 706 – Military Equipment

3. Monterey Police Department Annual Military Equipment Report (May 2024 to May 2025)
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 7, Packet Page 145 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

ACCEPTING ANNUAL REPORT AND RENEWING THE MILITARY EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND USE ORDINANCE – MONTEREY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 27, ARTICLE 3, SECTION 27-10, AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT

INCLUDING A CRISIS NEGOTIATING TEAM COMMAND VEHICLE, FOUR UNMANNED

AERIAL SYSTEMS, AND REPLACE EIGHT PATROL RIFLES
WHEREAS, the Monterey City Council approved the Monterey Police Department Policy 706 – Military Equipment and the Military Equipment Inventory with Ordinance 3649 on April 19, 2022 and renewed each subsequent year;
WHEREAS, the Monterey Police Department’s Annual Military Equipment Report complies with the standards for approval set forth in the Military Equipment Use Policy; MPD Policy 706 – Military Equipment and Military Equipment Inventory, and California Government Code Sections 7070, 7071, and 7072 for law enforcement’s acquisition, use, and funding of “military equipment”;
WHEREAS, Government Code § 7072 requires law enforcement agencies that received approval for their military equipment use policy, to submit to their governing body an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The governing body shall review the Military Equipment Purchase and Use Ordinance and vote on whether to renew the ordinance at a regular meeting. During its review, the governing body shall consider the annual report and determine whether each type of military equipment has complied with specified standards for approval; WHEREAS, the primary purpose of all equipment purchased by the Police Department is to save civilian lives, protect law enforcement personnel, reduce the risk for the City and enhance public safety. Some of the items designated by AB 481 as “military equipment” have been in our Police Department’s equipment inventory for many years. Monterey Police Department policies and procedures govern the use, safe handling, storage, and qualification of the specified equipment. Much of the equipment is part of the de-escalation process of Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics (ICAT), which involves continuously evaluating the situation to attempt other techniques. The equipment may be used to create cover and distance and allow more time for decision-making processes. This allows the use of less-lethal tactics as part of a range of options to resolve a critical incident without using deadly force. These things allow officers to take in and constantly evaluate the totality of the circumstances, resulting in increased safety and reduced risk for everyone involved; WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 7071(e)(2), the City Council has determined that:
(1) The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. (2) The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
(3) If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 8, Packet Page 146 (4) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance; and.

WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby renews the Military Equipment Purchase and Use Ordinance – Monterey City Code, Chapter 27, Article 3, Section 27-10 and authorizes the acquisition of additional military equipment including Crisis Negotiating Team Command Vehicle, four Unmanned Aerial Systems, and, replace eight Patrol Rifles.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 9, Packet Page 147 Policy
706
Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/01/30, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department Military Equipment - 1 Military Equipment
706.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This policy governs the use of military equipment, as defined in Government Code § 7070, as may be amended. The Monterey Police Department (MPD) and its members will comply with provisions of Government Code §§ 7071, 7072, and with otherwise applicable department policies, with respect to military equipment.
706.1.1 DEFINITIONS
This policy adopts the following definitions set forth in Government Code § 7070 (c)(1) through § 7070 (e)(16) as may be amended or superseded:

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.

Military equipment –

1. Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.

2. Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers.

However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

3. High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), commonly referred to as Humvees, two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached.

4. Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion.

5. Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.

6. Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.

7. Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature.

However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

8. Firearms of.50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotguns are specifically excluded from this subdivision.

9. Ammunition of.50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotgun ammunition is specifically excluded from this subdivision.

10. Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including assault weapons as defined in sections § 30510 and § 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard issue service weapons and ammunition of less than.50 caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a state agency.

11. Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 10, Packet Page 148 Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/01/30, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department Military Equipment - 2

12. "Flashbang" grenades and explosive breaching tools, "tear gas," and "pepper balls," excluding standard, service issued handheld pepper spray.

13. TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD).

14. The following projectile launch platforms and thier associated munitions: 40mm projectile launchers, "bean bag," rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons.

15. Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

16. Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (15), "Military Equipment" does not include general equipment not designated as prohibited or controlled by the Federal Defense Logistics Agency.
706.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Monterey Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. Use of military equipment should safeguard public welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. 706.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police designates the Assistant Chief of Police to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Monterey Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department's funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Coordinating the process for a person to register a complaint, concern, or question about the use of a type of military equipment. The Department will respond in a timely manner.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 11, Packet Page 149 Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/01/30, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department Military Equipment - 3 A complaint, concern or question related to Military Equipment utilization by the Monterey Police Department can be made through any of the below listed methods:

Email: [email protected]
Web:https://www.monterey.org/city_hall/police/inside_mpd/ commendations_or_complaints.php
By phone: (831) 646-3830
By mail: Monterey Police Department; Attn: Military Equipment Use Coordinator; 351 Madison Street, Monterey, CA 93940
706.4 APPROVAL
This policy, and any subsequent amendments, will be available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue. No later than May 1, 2022, this policy will be submitted to the City Council for approval, and will remain in effect only if it is approved within 180 days of submission. Approval of this policy or any subsequent amendments requires adoption by ordinance at an open session of a regular meeting providing for public comment. The department will cease use of any military equipment if its use, or the policy for its use, is not approved. An approved military equipment use policy is required prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 706.5 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment used by other jurisdictions providing aid to MPD shall comply with their respective military equipment use policies. MPD is a participating member of the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit (MPRSRU) in collaboration with other law enforcement agencies on the Monterey Peninsula. MPRSRU provides capabilities to address specific law enforcement issues, such as active shooter incidents, hostage situations, barricaded subject ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 12, Packet Page 150 Monterey Police Department
Monterey PD Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2025/01/30, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Monterey Police Department Military Equipment - 4 incidents, etc. MPD also collaborates and works with the Monterey County Sheriff's Department and other local, state and federal law enforcement agencies that may provide aid to MPD.

Military equipment owned by other jurisdictions that may be used by MPRSRU inside the City of Monterey's jurisdiction is listed in Section Two of the Military Equipment Inventory. MPD is authorized to use that military equipment in connection with MPRSRU activities/responses. 706.6 ANNUAL REPORT
Within one year of approval of the military equipment use policy, and annually thereafter, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee will submit a military equipment report for each type of approved military equipment for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The annual military equipment report will be publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment. 706.7 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the public may discuss and ask questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
706.8 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
Attached is the Annual Military Equipment Report (May 2023 to May 2024) which includes the Military Equipment and is divided into three sections.
• Section One - lists qualifying equipment that is owned and/or utilized by the Monterey Police Department.
• Section Two - lists qualifying equipment that is not owned by the Monterey Police Department, but which is known to be owned and/or utilized by law enforcement agencies which the Monterey Police Department collaborates and/or participates with as part of the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit (MPRSRU) for law enforcement purposes.
• Section Three - lists qualifying equipment that the Monterey Police Department will be procuring, with anticipated dates of procurement.

See attachment: MPD ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIP REPORT (05-23 to 05-24).pdf ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 13, Packet Page 151 1 | Page
Monterey Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Report
(May 2024 to May 2025)
California Government Code §§ 7070, 7071, and 7072
On September 30, 2021, California Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) was signed into law. California Government Code §§ 7070, 7071, and 7072 codify the requirements established by AB 481 for law enforcement’s acquisition, use, and funding of “military equipment.”
In enacting AB 481, the Legislature stated the public has a right to know about any funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment by state or local government officials to increase transparency, accountability, and oversight. The same applies to the public’s right to participate in any government agency’s decision to fund, acquire, or use such equipment.

The bill required law enforcement agencies that seek to continue the use of military equipment acquired prior to January 1, 2022, to receive approval from their governing body prior to May 1, 2022. The Monterey City Council approved MPD Policy 706 – Military Equipment and the Military Equipment Inventory by ordinance (3649). The policy and inventory list are located on the Monterey Police Department’s website – www.montereypolice.org.

California Government Code § 7072 requires law enforcement agencies to prepare annually, a Military Equipment Report. The annual Military Equipment Report is required to contain the following. • A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use; • A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment; • The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response;
• The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report;
• The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment; and • If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.

This annual Military Equipment Report satisfies the reporting requirements outlined in California Government Code § 7072.

A complaint, concern or question related to Military Equipment utilization by the Monterey Police Department can be made through any of the below listed methods:

ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 14, Packet Page 152 2 | Page
Email: [email protected]
Web:https://www.monterey.org/city_hall/police/inside_mpd/commendations_or_complaints.php By phone: (831) 646-3830
By mail: Monterey Police Department; Attn: Military Equipment Use Coordinator; 351 Madison Street, Monterey, CA 93940
The following is a summary of the Military Equipment owned and maintained by the Monterey Police Department as defined by California Government Code §7070:

Item Quantity Owned Gov’t Code Subsection
Semi Automatic Patrol Rifles
53 7070(c)(10)
Unmanned Aircraft Systems
4 7070(c)(1)
Remington 870 Less Lethal Shotgun
2 7070(c)(14)
Remington 870 Breaching Shotgun
3 7070(c)(7)
40mm Less Lethal Single + Multi Launcher
14 7070(c)(14)
37mm Less Lethal Launcher
2 7070(c)(14)
Desert Tech SRS M2 Precision Rifle
2 7070(c)(10)
Pepper Ball Launcher
2 7070(c)(14)
The following is a summary of the Military Equipment used by the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit. The Monterey Police Department does not own or maintain this equipment; however, the military equipment may be used by members of the MPRSU (SWAT) during a critical incident in the City of Monterey. (California Government Code §7071(a)(1)(D) Item Gov’t Code Subsection
Unmanned, Remotely Piloted, Powered Ground Vehicle
7070(c)(1)
7071(a)(1)(D)
Rescue Vehicle (Lenco Bearcat Armored Vehicle)
7070(c)(3)
7071(a)(1)(D)
Workhorse Commercial Van
7070(c)(5)
7071(a)(1)(D)
Flashbang Grenades, Explosive Breaching Tools, Tear Gas, and Pepper Balls
7070(c)(12)
7071(a)(1)(D)
Remington 870 Breaching Shotgun
7070(c)(10)
7071(a)(1)(D)
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 15, Packet Page 153 3 | Page
The following is a summary of Military Equipment the Monterey Police Department intends to purchase. (California Government Code §7072(a)(6)
37mm Less lethal Launcher
7070(c)(14)
7071(a)(1)(D)
40mm Less Lethal Launcher
7070(c)(14)
7071(a)(1)(D)
Item Quantity
Sought
Gov’t Code
Section
Note
LDV – Crisis Negotiation Team Command
Vehicle
1 7070(c)(05) Approved by Monterey City
Council in 2022, 2023 and
2024. Vehicle is being built,
it is anticipated to be
completed in the summer of
2025
Semi Automatic Patrol Rifles
8 7070(c)(10) Replace 8 rifles that are 20
years old
Unmanned, Remotely Piloted, Powered
Ground Vehicle
4 7070(c)(1) 1 Skydio X10 or similar, 3 DJI
Avata 2 or similar
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 16, Packet Page 154 Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Semiautomatic Rifles and Ammunition
Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

The patrol rifles were deployed within the guidelines set force in MPD Policy 306. Over the past 12 months, MPD officers deployed the rifle, but not fired, in circumstances outlined in MPD Policy 306.

There were no reportable incidents in the City of Monterey.

Complaints or Concerns: The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: The MPD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for all of the rifles. There were no violations of the military equipment use policy.

Total Annual Cost:

Acquisition: $33,000 (Replaced 13 rifles in 2024)
Training: $6,000 (ammunition, targets, magazines, etc.,) Other: $500 (parts, e.g. batteries, other spare parts)
Funding Source: Police Budget
Quantity: 53
Intention to acquire more: Yes. Replace eight (8) patrol rifles for FY25/26 budget. The eight (8) rifles due for replacement are 20 years old.

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE §7070(c)(10)
Description: Semiautomatic Rifles and Ammunition
Quantity (existing): 53
Capabilities: The Colt semiautomatic rifle is capable of firing 5.56mm projectile bullet Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's description: The Colt semiautomatic rifle features the railed forend. The rail system features the patented bolt-up attachment system. The Colt semiautomatic rifle is unmatched in size, weight, and performance.

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use:

Officers may deploy the patrol rifle in any circumstance where the officer can articulate a reasonable expectation that the rifle may be needed. Examples of some general guidelines for deploying the patrol rifle may include but are not limited to:
(1) Situations where the member reasonably anticipates an armed encounter. (2) When a member is faced with a situation that may require accurate and effective fire at long range.
(3) Situations where a member reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect's firepower.
(4) When a member reasonably believes that there may be a need to fire on a barricaded person or a person with a hostage.
(5) When a member reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor. (6) When authorized or requested by a supervisor.
(7) When needed to euthanize an animal.

Initial cost: Approximately $115,000
Annual costs: Approximately $6,000 (ammunition, repair parts, batteries, etc.) Legal: CA Penal Code 33220(b). All other applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing short-barreled rifles and police use of force
Procedural: MPD Policies - 300 (Use of Force), 306 (Firearms), 412 (Rapid Response and Deployment) Required training: CA POST certified 16-hour patrol rifle course & 4 hours annually / qualification annually Other Notes:

These rifles are standard issue service weapons for MPD officers and as a result exempted from the Military Equipment Use Policy per CA Gov’t Code §7070 (c)(10). They have been included in this document for transparency.

ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 17, Packet Page 155

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(1)
Description: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Quantity (existing): 4 (2 DJI Mini 3 Pros and 2 DJI Mavic 3 Pro) Capabilities: UAS are capable of being remotely navigated to provide scene information and intelligence in the form of video and still images transmitted to first responders.

Expected lifespan: 5 Years
Manufacturer's description:

DJI Mini 3 Pro / 3 mini features both an infrared sensing system and forward, backward, and downward vision systems. This allows for hovering and flying indoors as well as outdoors and for automatic return to home while avoiding obstacles from the front, back, and below. DJI Mini 3 Pro also boasts a foldable and compact design, weighing less than 249 g. The aircraft has a maximum flight speed of 36 mph (57.6 kph), a maximum flight time of 34 minutes when using an intelligent flight battery, and a maximum flight time of 47 minutes when using an intelligent flight battery plus.

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use:

To enhance the safety of potentially dangerous situations by providing first responders with the ability to monitor video feed from UAS cameras of hazardous areas prior to, or in lieu of, sending in personnel. UAS/Drone/Ariel platforms may be used for search and rescue; suspect apprehension, crime scene documentation; tactical operations; scene security; hazard monitoring; identification and mitigation; response to emergency calls; crisis communications; legally authorized surveillance.

Initial cost: $8,657.24
Annual costs: $300 (batteries, propellers, and other parts) Legal:

All applicable State, Federal and Local laws. Any use of UAS/Drone platforms will be in strict accordance with constitutional and privacy rights and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations. All drone operators will be FAA Part 107 certified.

Procedural: MPD Policies – 606 Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations Required training:

Prior to piloting any UAS/Drone, staff members must secure an FAA Remote Pilot License (Part 107) and complete training required by FAA COA. Program Supervisor(s) and Commander(s) will attend a California P.O.S.T. UAS Operators Course (48 hours). UAS Pilots will attend a California P.O.S.T. UAS Basic Pilots Course (32 hours). All members of the UAS Team will attend the California POST approved FAA 107 Ground School (8 hours).

ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 18, Packet Page 156 Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

On 07/23/24 at 2230 hours, MPD officers responded to an attempted murder (stabbing) at Reeside and Foam. At the request of the MPD, the Marina Police Department responded with a drone (UAS) to look for the suspect.

On 08/10/24 at 2300 hours, MPD officers assigned to the MPRSRU assisted the Marina Police Department with the service of a search warrant. An MPD officer used a drone to assist with clearing the residence.

On 12/13/24 at 0400 hours, MPD officers assigned to the MPRSRU assisted the King City Police Department with the service of a search warrant. An MPD officer flew a drone over the residence to assist the MPRSRU with their operation.

On 12/31/24 at 1630 hours, an MPD officer used the drone to confirm traffic control patterns, estimate crowd size and monitor for suspicious or potential safety related activity for a downtown special event.

Complaints or Concerns: The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: The MPD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for all of the UAS’. There were no violations of the military equipment use policy.

Total Annual Cost:

Acquisition: $0
Training: $800
Other: $2,000 (equipment, cases, batteries, light)
Funding Source: Police Budget
Quantity: 4
Intention to acquire more: Yes, purchase (1) Skydio X10 or another UAS with similar specifications and (3) DJI Avata 2 drones or another UAS with similar specifications
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 19, Packet Page 157

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(14)
Description: Remington 870 Shotgun and Kinetic Energy Munitions Quantity (existing): 2 (Assigned to the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit) (MPRSRU) Capabilities: The shotgun Less Lethal platform is capable of firing CSI “Super-Sock” Kinetic Energy Munitions, which are fiber bean bag projectiles
Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's description:

The Remington Shotgun is milled from a single block of steel. The stock and fore grip are comprised of fiberglass-reinforced polymer with a rubber over-molding. This shotgun is a U.S.- made pump-action shotgun. It holds 6 less-lethal rounds.

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use: The shotgun Less Lethal platform and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a lesslethal use of force option Initial cost: $1,200
Annual costs: $500 (includes fiber bean bag projectiles) Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force Procedural: MPD Policies - 306 (Firearms), 303 (Control Devices and Techniques) Required training: Two hours of initial training and two (2) hours every two (2) years (includes qualification) Other:

All MPRSRU members are required to complete an initial POST certified 80 hour basic SWAT course, 120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT update training bi-annually.

MPRSRU members train on this piece of equipment 4 hours annually.

Note:

Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Remington 870 Shotgun and Kinetic Energy Munitions
Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

This equipment is used primarily in situations where officers encounter a subject armed with a weapon other than a firearm. The less lethal munitions are used to disarm violent individuals from a safe distance. The less lethal shotguns are owned by the MPD and assigned to the MPRSRU. There were no reportable incidents in the City of Monterey.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: The MPD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for all of the Remington 870 less lethal shotguns. There were no violations of the military equipment use policy.

Total Annual Cost:

Acquisition: $0 (no new shotguns were acquired)
Training: $500
Others: $0
Funding Source: Police Budget
Quantity: 2
Intention to acquire more: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 20, Packet Page 158

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(14)
Description: Pepper Ball Launcher
Quantity (existing): 2
Capabilities: The Pepperball VKS Pro is a less lethal launcher designed to use compressed air to launch .68 caliber plastic pepperballs containing powdered OC
Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's description:

Pepperball VKS Pro is a less lethal launcher with a magazine containing 15 rounds with a maximum effective range of 150 feet using compressed air from a HPA buttstock 13ci tank. LiveX pepper balls are 0,68 caliber sphere contain 5% PAVA (pelargonic acid vanillylamide) pepper powder
Purpose(s)/Authorized Use:

Less-lethal stand-off intervention with armed and/or violent individuals, suicidal individuals, individuals believed to possess or have immediate access to a deadly weapon or driving suspects from confined suspects or vehicles.

Initial cost: $6,306
Annual costs: $450 (training rounds and maintenance)
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force Procedural: MPD Policies -300-(Use of Force) 306 (Firearms), 303 (Control Devices and Techniques) Required training: Two (2) hours of initial training and (2) hours every (2) years (includes qualification) Other:

All MPRSRU members are required to complete an initial POST certified 80 hour basic SWAT course, 120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT update training bi-annually.

MPRSRU members train on this piece of equipment 4 hours annually.

Note:

Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Pepper Ball Launcher
Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

This equipment is used primarily in situations where officers encounter a subject armed with a weapon other than a firearm. The less lethal munitions are used to disarm violent individuals from a safe distance. There were no reportable incidents in the City of Monterey.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: The MPD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for all of the Pepper Ball launchers. There were no violations of the military equipment use policy.

Total Annual Cost:

Acquisition: $6,306 (2 were acquired in 2024)
Training: $450
Others: $0
Funding Source: Police Budget
Quantity: 2
Intention to acquire more: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 21, Packet Page 159

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(7)
Description: Remington 870 Shotgun and Breaching Munitions Quantity (existing): 1 (1 Assigned to the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit) (MPRSRU) Capabilities: Remington 870 12 gauge shotgun modified with pistol grip and barrel standoff designed for breaching doors or other points of entry.

Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's description:

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use:

A breaching shotgun can be deployed any time tactical operators determine that it is necessary to complete a lawful breaching, and other breaching methods are determined to be ineffective.

Shotgun breaching generally needs to be supported by exigent circumstances necessitating immediate access for public safety.

Initial cost: $600
Annual costs: $250 (includes breaching munitions)
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force Procedural:

MPD Policies - 306 (Firearms), 303 (Control Devices and Techniques), 404 (Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit)
Required training: Two hours of initial training and two (2) hours every two (2) years (includes qualification) Other:

All MPRSRU members are required to complete an initial POST certified 80 hour basic SWAT course, 120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT update training bi-annually. MPRSRU members train on this piece of equipment 4 hours annually.

Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Remington 870 Breaching Shotgun
Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

Can be deployed any time tactical operators determine that it is necessary to complete a lawful breaching, and other breaching methods are determined to be ineffective. There were no reportable incidents in the City of Monterey.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: The MPD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for all of the Remington 870 breaching shotguns. There were no violations of the military equipment use policy.

Total Annual Cost:

Acquisition: $0 (no new shotguns were acquired)
Training: $250
Others: $0
Funding Source: Police Budget
Quantity: 1
Intention to acquire more: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 22, Packet Page 160

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(7)
Description: Remington 870 Shotgun and Breaching Munitions Quantity (existing): 2 (assigned to MPD)
Capabilities: Remington 870 12 gauge shotgun modified with pistol grip and barrel standoff designed for breaching doors or other points of entry.

Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's description:

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use:

A breaching shotgun can be deployed any time tactical operators determine that it is necessary to complete a lawful breaching, and other breaching methods are determined to be ineffective.

Shotgun breaching generally needs to be supported by exigent circumstances necessitating immediate access for public safety.

Initial cost: $1,200 of Remington 870 shotgun
Annual costs: $500 (includes fiber bean bag projectiles) Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force Procedural:

Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Remington 870 Breaching Shotgun
Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

Can be deployed any time tactical operators determine that it is necessary to complete a lawful breaching, and other breaching methods are determined to be ineffective. The MPD did not have a reportable use of the breaching shotgun. Only trained personnel are authorized to use the breaching shotgun. There were no reportable incidents in the City of Monterey.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: The MPD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for all of the Remington 870 breaching shotguns. There were no violations of the military equipment use policy.

Total Annual Cost:

Acquisition: $0
Training: $500
Others: $300 (conversion from regular shotgun to breaching shotgun) Funding Source: Police Budget
Quantity: 2
Intention to acquire more: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 23, Packet Page 161

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(14)
Description: 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions Quantity (existing): 14
Capabilities: The 40mm Less Lethal Launcher is capable of firing 40mm Kinetic Energy Munitions, known as sponge projectiles
Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's description:

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use: The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a lesslethal use of force option Initial cost: $41,000
Annual costs: $6,000 (includes sponge projectiles for training) Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force Procedural: MPD Policies - 306 (Firearms), 303 (Control Devices and Techniques) Required training: Two (2) hours of initial training and (2) hours every (2) years (includes qualification) Other:

MPD has two (2) pump-action 40mm multi-shot launchers and twelve (12) single shot launcher; one less lethal launcher for each patrol vehicle. The single shot launchers replaced the less lethal shotguns.

ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 24, Packet Page 162 Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:
40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

On 08/10/2024, MPD Officers assigned to the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit (MPRSRU) were serving a high-risk search warrant and used two (2) 40mm munitions to break a house window. One of the officers then used the 37mm multi launcher to deliver a total of six (6) 37mm liquid CS ferret rounds into the residence.

On 10/15/2024 at 2151 hours, MPD officers responded to the 400 block of David Avenue regarding an intoxicated subject threatening family members. Officers arrived on scene and the subject threatened officers with a knife. The subject fled through the back of the house with a sword and was confronted by officers outside the residence. He ignored officers’ commands to drop the sword and began walking away. An officer used the 40mm multi-shot launcher (five rounds) to disarm the subject.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: The MPD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for all of the 40mm less lethal launchers. There were no violations of the military equipment use policy.

Total Annual Cost:

Acquisition: $0.00
Training: $6,000
Others: $0
Funding Source: Police Budget
Quantity: 14
Intention to acquire more: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 25, Packet Page 163

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(14)
Description: 37mm Less Lethal Launcher and Oleoresin Capsicum “OC” munitions Quantity (existing): 2
Capabilities:

The 37mm Less Lethal Launcher is capable of firing barricade penetrating “OC” rounds of OC powder into a defined space. They are designed to dislodge barricaded subjects from confined areas.

Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's description: The Federal 37 mm Less Lethal Launcher is a single-shot break-open platform designed to fire 37mm less lethal oleoresin capsicum munitions
Purpose(s)/Authorized Use: They are intended for use as a less-lethal use of force option Initial cost: $3,000
Annual costs: $100 (includes munitions)
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force and crowd control Procedural: MPD Policies - 306 (Firearms), 303 (Control Devices and Techniques) Required training: Two (2) hours of initial training and two (2) hours every two (2) years Other: Only Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit (MPRSRU) trained personnel and Less Lethal Instructors are authorized to use this Less Lethal launcher.

Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:
37mm Less Lethal Launcher and Oleoresin Capsicum “OC” munitions Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

The 37mm less lethal launcher and “OC” munition is used for firing penetrating “OC” rounds of “OC” powder into a defined space. They are designed to dislodge barricaded subjects from confined areas.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: The MPD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for all of the 37mm launchers.

There were no violations of the military equipment use policy.

Total Annual Cost:

Acquisition: $0
Training: $100 (munitions)
Others: $0
Funding Source: Police Budget
Quantity: 2
Intention to acquire more: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 26, Packet Page 164

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(10)
Description: Desert Tech SRS M2 Precision Rifle
Quantity (existing): 2
Capabilities: The Desert Tech SRS M2 is a bolt action rifle capable of firing a .308 caliber projectile bullet.

Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's description:

The SRS-M2 adds the ability to make fast and easy adjustments to accessories mounted on the forearm through the integrated Area 419 Arcalock rail. The full-length 30 MOA tapered top rail minimizes optical visual displacement when moving between day and night scopes.

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use:

This rifle is authorized for use by Precision Rifle/Observer SWAT Operator(s) only. It is deployed in conjunction with the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit SWAT Team during highrisk incidents.

Initial cost: $10,000 (rifle, scope, attachments/equipment) Annual costs: $2,000 (includes ammunition and cleaning supplies) Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force.

Procedural:

MPD Policies - 300 (Use of Force), 306 (Firearms), 404 (Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit), 412 (Rapid Response and Deployment)
Required training:

All MPRSRU members are required to complete an initial POST certified 80 hour basic SWAT course, 120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT update training bi-annually. MPRSRU Precision Rifle/Observers must also complete a 40 Post certified SWAT precision rifle/observer course and attend 120 hours of training annually.

Other: N/A
Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Desert Tech SRS M2 Precision Rifle
Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: The MPD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for the rifle. There were no violations of the military equipment use policy.

Total Annual Cost:

Acquisition: $5330 (1 rifle and equipment was acquired in 2024) Training: $1,800 (ammunition)
Other: $200 (cleaning supplies, optic batteries, parts) Funding Source: Police Budget
Quantity: 2
Intention to acquire more: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 27, Packet Page 165

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT USED AS PART OF THE MPRSRU GOVERNMENT CODES § 7070(c)(1) and 7071(a)(1)(D)
Description: Unmanned, Remotely Piloted Powered Aerial and Ground Vehicles Quantity (existing):
0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team and Sheriff's Bomb Squad)
Capabilities:

Vehicles are capable of being remotely navigated to provide scene information and intelligence in the form of video and still images transmitted to first responders.

Expected lifespan: 5 years
Manufacturer's Description:

Remotely operated land vehicles to support various mission areas such as explosive device remediation, hazardous materials operations, tactical law enforcement operations, search & rescue, and surveillance/detection. Examples include, but are not limited to rovers, scout vehicles, and surveillance platforms. Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) comprises an unmanned aircraft and the equipment necessary for the safe and efficient operation of that aircraft. The system generally includes a fixed or rotary-wing (tethered or non-tethered) aircraft and a ground control station.

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use:

To enhance the safety of potentially dangerous situations by providing first responders with the ability to monitor video feed from vehicle cameras of hazardous areas prior to, or in lieu of, sending in personnel. Remotely piloted ground vehicles may be used to investigate and mitigate potential explosive devices. UAS/Drone/Arial platforms may be used for search and rescue; suspect apprehension crime scene documentation; tactical operations; scene security; hazard monitoring; identification and mitigation; response to emergency calls; crisis communications; legally authorized surveillance.

Initial Cost: $0 (not owned by MPD)
Annual Costs: $0 (not maintained by MPD)
Legal:

All applicable State, Federal and Local laws. Any use of UAS/Drone platforms will be in strict accordance with constitutional and privacy rights and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations.

Procedural: MPD Policies - 404 (Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit) Required Training:

MPRSRU SWAT Team provides internal training for staff members prior to allowing them to operate the ground vehicle equipment. All MPRSRU members are required to complete an initial POST certified 80 hour basic SWAT course, 120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT update training bi-annually. Prior to piloting any UAS/Drone staff members must secure an FAA Remote Pilot License and complete training required by FAA COA.

Other:

The Monterey Police Department participates in the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit SWAT Team (MPRSRU). The Monterey County Sheriff's Office also provides the regional explosive mitigation team "bomb squad." This equipment is owned and operated by MPRSRU SWAT and the Monterey County Sheriff's Department. While the Monterey Police Department does not own this equipment, it could be used in Monterey by MPRSRU SWAT or the Monterey County Sheriff's Department if they are deployed to an incident within city limits.

ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 28, Packet Page 166 Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Unmanned, Remotely Piloted, Powered Aerial and Ground Vehicles Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

Drones (UAS) from the Seaside Police/Fire team and the Monterey County Sheriff’s Office were used to assist officers on the outside of the residence and to help safely clear the residence.

Complaints or Concerns: The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: This equipment is not owned or maintained by the Monterey Police Department Total Annual Cost: There is no cost to the Monterey Police Department Quantity: 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team and Sheriff's Bomb Squad)
Intention to Acquire More: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 29, Packet Page 167

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT USED AS PART OF THE MPRSRU GOVERNMENT CODES §7070(c)(3) and 7071(a)(1)(D)
Description: MPRSRU Rescue Vehicle (Lenco Bearcat Armored Vehicle) Quantity (existing): 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team) Capabilities: Capable of transporting personnel and equipment while providing them with armored protection.

Also has a breaching apparatus that can be attached.

Expected Lifespan: 10 years
Manufacturer's Description:

The Lenco BearCat is the standard tactical armored vehicle for special operations units within the US Law Enforcement community. Since the early 2000s, agencies such as LAPD, LASD SEB, NYPD ESU, Boston PD and hundreds of Federal, State and Local Law Enforcement agencies have made the BearCat part of their standard operating procedure. The Bearcat has excellent on-road driving characteristics and maneuverability in tight urban settings. The large floor plan seats 10 – 12 fully equipped officers.

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use:

The SRU Rescue Vehicle (Lenco Bearcat Armored Vehicle) is intended for use during critical incidents including, but not limited to: (a) Hostage situations; (b) Barricaded subject incidents; (c) Active shooter situations; (d) High risk arrest and search warrants; (e) Any threat of explosive devices; (f) Other situations where ballistic protection is necessary for the protection of personnel. The SRU Rescue Vehicle will not be deployed for situations such as peaceful protests or demonstrations where violence is not threatened toward the public, property or law enforcement personnel. When deploying the vehicle one must consider how its use or misuse could create fear or distrust in the community and take steps to mitigate those negative effects. The SRU Rescue vehicle may be deployed for exhibition at community based events for the purpose of educating and familiarizing the public with its use and purpose.

Initial Cost: $0 (not owned by MPD)
Annual Costs: $0 (not maintained by MPD)
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws
Procedural: MPD Policies - 404 (Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit) Required Training:

The SRU Rescue Vehicle is driven by approved personnel who have received training in the vehicle’s operation. The training includes both classroom and practical driving exercises. Operators also receive scenario based training to include the decision making process as to how it should and should not be deployed. Scenario based training includes constitutional and community policing principles as it relates to SRU Rescue Vehicle deployment. All MPRSRU members are required to complete an initial POST Certified 80 hour basic SWAT course, 120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT update training bi-annually.

ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 30, Packet Page 168 Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

MPRSRU Rescue Vehicle (Lenco Bearcat Armored Vehicle)
Summary of how the
military equipment was used
and the purpose of its use:

The MPRSRU Rescue Vehicle (Lenco Bearcat Armored Vehicle) is intended for use during critical incidents including, but not limited to: (a) Hostage situations; (b) Barricaded subject incidents; (c) Active shooter situations; (d) High risk arrest and search warrants; (e) Any threat of explosive devices; (f) Other situations where ballistic protection is necessary for the protection of personnel.

On 07/03/2024 at approximately 1752 hours, MPD officers served an arrest warrant at a residence on Cielo Vista. The subject barricaded himself inside the residence. The Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit (MPRSU) responded and assisted with the service of the warrant. A Lenco Bearcat was used during the service of the arrest warrant. Drones (UAS) from the Seaside Police/Fire team and the Monterey County Sheriff’s Office were used to assist officers on the outside of the residence and to help safely clear the residence.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: This equipment is not owned or maintained by the Monterey Police Department.

Total Annual Cost: There is no cost to the Monterey Police Department.

Quantity: 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team) Intention to Acquire More: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 31, Packet Page 169

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT USED AS PART OF THE MPRSRU GOVERNMENT CODES § 7070(c)(5) and 7071(a)(1)(D)
Description: Workhorse Commercial Van
Quantity (existing): 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team) Capabilities: Vehicles modified to facilitate the control and direction of public safety units.

Expected Lifespan: Unknown
Manufacturer's Description: Unavailable
Purpose(s)/Authorized Use: Workspace for commanding/supervising personnel during critical incidents and utilized community outreach events, such as National Night Out, Public Safety Outreach, etc.

MPRSU SWAT Team provides internal training for staff members prior to allowing them to operate these vehicles. All MPRSRU members are required to complete an initial POST certified 80 hour basic SWAT course, 120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT update training bi-annually.

Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Workhorse Commercial Van
Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

Workspace for commanding/supervising personnel during critical incidents and utilized community outreach events, such as National Night Out, Public Safety Outreach, etc.

On 07/03/2024 at approximately 1752 hours, MPD officers served an arrest warrant at a residence on Cielo Vista. The subject barricaded himself inside the residence. The Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit (MPRSU) responded and assisted with the service of the warrant. A Lenco Bearcat and a Workhorse Commercial Van were used during the service of the arrest warrant.

Drones (UAS) from the Seaside Police/Fire team and the Monterey County Sheriff’s Office were used to assist officers on the outside of the residence and to help safely clear the residence.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Internal Audits, Violations,
Actions: This equipment is not owned or maintained by the Monterey Police Department.

Total Annual Cost: There is no cost to the Monterey Police Department.

Quantity: 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT) Intention to Acquire More: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 32, Packet Page 170

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT USED AS PART OF THE MPRSRU GOVERNMENT CODES § 7070(c)(12) and 7071(a)(1)(D)
Description: Flashbang Grenades, Explosive Breaching Tools, Tear Gas and Pepper Balls Quantity (existing): 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team) Capabilities: Capable of breaching doors, gates, windows, and other points of entry, creating explosive distractions, and/or deploying tear gas or pepper chemical.

Expected Lifespan: Unknown
Manufacturer's Description:

A full-line manufacturer, Defense Technology’s premier product lines are grouped into five categories including aerosols, impact munitions, distraction devices, chemical munitions and launchers.

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use: Breaching doors, gates, windows, and other points of entry, creating explosive distractions, and/or deploying tear gas or pepper chemicals.

Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Flashbang Grenades, Explosive Breaching Tools, Tear Gas and Pepper Balls Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

The Monterey Police Department participates in the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit SWAT Team (MPRSRU). This equipment is owned and operated by MPRSRU SWAT. While the Monterey Police Department does not own this equipment, it may be used in Monterey by MPRSRU SWAT if they are deployed to an incident within city limits.

There were no reportable incidents in the City of Monterey.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: This equipment is not owned or maintained by the Monterey Police Department.

Total Annual Cost: There is no cost to the Monterey Police Department.

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT USED AS PART OF THE MPRSRU GOVERNMENT CODES § 7070(c)(7) and 7071(a)(1)(D)
Description: Remington 870 Breaching Shotgun
Quantity (existing): 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team) Capabilities: Remington 870 12 gauge shotgun modified with pistol grip and barrel standoff designed for breaching doors or other points of entry
Expected Lifespan: Unknown
Manufacturer's Description:

The Remington Shotgun is milled from a single block of steel. The stock and fore grip are comprised of fiberglass-reinforced polymer with a rubber over-molding. This shotgun is a U.S.-made pump-action shotgun. It holds 6 less-lethal rounds.

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use:

Can be deployed any time tactical operators determine that it is necessary to complete a lawful breaching, and other breaching methods are determined to be ineffective. Shotgun breaching generally needs to be supported by exigent circumstances necessitating immediate access for public safety.

Initial Cost: $0 (not owned by MPD)
Annual Costs: $0 (not maintained by MPD)
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force Procedural: MPD Policies - 404 (Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit) Required Training:

All MPRSRU members complete a certified 80 hour basic SWAT course, 120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT update training bi-annually. MPRSRU members train on this piece of equipment 4 hours annually.

Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:

Remington 870 Breaching Shotgun
Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

There were no reportable incidents in the City of Monterey.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: This equipment is not owned or maintained by the Monterey Police Department.

Total Annual Cost: There is no cost to the Monterey Police Department.

Quantity: 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team Intention to Acquire More: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 34, Packet Page 172

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT USED AS PART OF THE MPRSRU GOVERNMENT CODES § 7070(c)(14) and 7071(a)(1)(D)
Description: 37mm Less Lethal Launcher and Oleoresin Capsicum “OC” munitions Quantity (existing): 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team) Capabilities: The 37mm Less Lethal Launcher is capable of firing barricade penetrating “OC” rounds which disperse .02 ounces of OC powder into a defined space. These munitions are designed to dislodge barricaded subjects from confined areas.

Expected Lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's Description: The Federal 37 mm Less Lethal Launcher. Is a single-shot break-open platform designed to fire 37mm less lethal oleoresin capsicum munitions.

Purpose(s)/Authorized Use: The 37mm Less Lethal Launchers and “OC” Munitions are intended for use as a less-lethal use of force option
Initial Cost: $0 (not owned by MPD)
Annual Costs: $0 (not maintained by MPD)
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force Procedural: MPD Policies - 404 (Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit) Required Training:

Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:
37mm Less Lethal Launcher and Oleoresin Capsicum “OC” munitions Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

The Monterey Police Department participates in the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit SWAT Team (MPRSRU). This equipment is owned and operated by MPRSRU SWAT. While the Monterey Police Department does not own this equipment, it could be used in Monterey by MPRSRU SWAT if they are deployed to an incident within city limits.

There were no reportable uses of the 37mm Less Lethal Launcher by the MPRSRU in the City of Monterey.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: This equipment is not owned or maintained by the Monterey Police Department.

Total Annual Cost: There is no cost to the Monterey Police Department.

Quantity: 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT) Intention to Acquire More: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 35, Packet Page 173

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT UTILIZED BY THE MONTEREY POLICE DEPARTMENT USED AS PART OF THE MPRSRU GOVERNMENT CODES § 7070(c)(14) and 7071(a)(1)(D)
Description: 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions Quantity (existing): 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team) Capabilities: The 40mm Less Lethal Launcher is capable of firing 40mm Kinetic Energy Munitions, known as sponge projectiles
Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's description:

Penn Arms 40mm Multi-Shot launchers are manufactured using 4140 hardened steel, 6061- T6 mil-spec anodized aluminum, and DuPont super tough glass-filled nylon. These launchers are lightweight, versatile, and used worldwide by police and corrections officers. The 40mm launcher is available in both pump-action advance and single shot versions Purpose(s)/Authorized Use: The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a lesslethal use of force option.

Initial cost: $0 (not owned by MPD)
Annual costs: $0 (not maintained by MPD)
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force.

Procedural: MPD Policies - 404 (Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit) Required training:

All MPRSRU members are required to complete an initial POST certified 80 hour basic SWAT course, 120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT update training bi-annually.

MPRSRU members train on this piece of equipment 4 hours annually.

Other:

The Monterey Police Department participates in the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit SWAT Team (MPRSRU). This equipment is registered to the Sand City Police Department for use by MPRSRU SWAT. While the Monterey Police Department does not own this equipment, it could be used in Monterey by MPRSRU SWAT if they are deployed to an incident within city limits.

Government Code Section § 7072 – Annual Report:
40mm Less lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions Summary of how the military
equipment was used and the
purpose of its use:

The Monterey Police Department participates in the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit SWAT Team (MPRSRU). This equipment is owned and operated by MPRSRU SWAT. While the Monterey Police Department does not own this equipment, it could be used in Monterey by MPRSRU SWAT if they are deployed to an incident within city limits.

There were no reportable uses of the 40mm Less Lethal Launcher by the MPRSRU in the City of Monterey.

Complaints or Concerns:

The MPD did not receive any complaints or concerns regarding this military equipment.

Audits, Violations, Actions: This equipment is not owned or maintained by the Monterey Police Department.

Total Annual Cost: There is no cost to the Monterey Police Department.

Quantity: 0 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT) Intention to Acquire More: No
ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 36, Packet Page 174

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION REQUEST
GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(5)
Description: LDV Inc. Custom Specialty Vehicles - Crisis Negotiation Team Command Vehicle Quantity:
1 sought (Approved in 2022, 2023, and 2024 purchased through grant cycle for 2024, to be owned by MPD and utilized by MPRSRU – CNT). Vehicle is backordered.

Capabilities: Vehicle is modified to act as a Negotiations Operations Center at critical incidents Expected lifespan: 20 years
Manufacturer's description: 2022 Ford E-450 Cutaway - Emergency Response Vehicle - Mobile Command Vehicle Purpose(s)/Authorized Use:

This vehicle will provide a designated Negotiations Operations Center (NOC) in a constant state of operational readiness for the MPRSRU Crisis Negotiations Team (CNT) that will aid in the resolution of crisis incidents. Also utilized for community outreach events such as National Night Out, Public Safety Outreach, etc.

Initial cost:
$200,000 initial outlay to be reimbursed through the Homeland Security Grant Program - Urban Areas Security Initiative. Ordered Fiscal Year 24, currently being built, anticipated completion - summer 2025.

Annual costs: $2,500 / year maintenance and upkeep
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force Procedural: MPD Policies - 404 (Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit) Required training:

Other:

The Monterey Police Department participates in the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit CNT Team (MPRSRU). This equipment will be registered to the Monterey Police and operated by MPRSRU CNT. This equipment could be used in Monterey by MPRSRU CNT if they are deployed to an incident within city limits.

Note:

The vehicle is currently being built and it is anticipated to be completed in the summer of 2025. The vehicle was approved by the Monterey City Council by Ordinance 3649 in 2022, 2023, 2024 ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 37, Packet Page 175

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION REQUEST
GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(1)
Description: UAS
Quantity (sought): 4 – (1) Skydio X10 or similar specifications and (3) DJI Avata 2 or similar specifications Capabilities: UAS are capable of being remotely navigated to provide scene information and intelligence in the form of video and still images transmitted to first responders.

Expected lifespan: 5-10 years
Manufacturer's
description:

The Skydio X10 is a rugged, professional-grade drone designed for demanding applications such as surveillance, inspections, and tactical operations. It boasts a modular airframe with replaceable sensor packages and a powerful suite of visual cameras, including a 50 MP wide module, a 64 MP narrow module, and a 48 MP telephoto module. Additionally, it features a 640x512 thermal camera with enhanced sensitivity for low-light environments. The X10 is powered by an NVIDIA Jetson Orin SoC, providing advanced autonomous capabilities, including 360° obstacle avoidance through Skydio's Autonomy Engine and NightSense for operation in total darkness. With a maximum flight speed of 45 mph and a flight time of up to 40 minutes, it operates across a wide temperature range from -4°F to 113°F. The drone has an IP55 weatherproof rating, making it resistant to dust and water. It is equipped with wireless connectivity options for ranges up to 7.5 miles, with the added ability to extend its range to unlimited distances when using 5G connectivity. Additionally, it offers quick deployment, transitioning from a folded state to airborne in under 40 seconds.

The DJI Avata 2 is an advanced first-person view (FPV) drone that offers an immersive flying experience, combining enhanced imaging capabilities with robust safety features. Weighing approximately 377 grams, it measures 185 mm in length, 212 mm in width, and 64 mm in height. The drone achieves a maximum ascent and descent speed of 9 meters per second in Sport mode, with a horizontal speed of up to 27 meters per second in Manual mode. It operates effectively up to an altitude of 5,000 meters and can withstand wind speeds up to

10.7 meters per second. Pilots can enjoy a maximum flight time of 23 minutes, capturing high-definition footage through its 12-megapixel camera with a 155° ultra-wide-angle field of view. The Avata 2 is compatible with DJI Goggles 3 and the DJI RC Motion 3 controller, offering intuitive motion control and features like Easy ACRO for performing acrobatic maneuvers with ease.

Purpose(s)/Authorized
Use:

UAS/Drone/Ariel platforms may be used for search and rescue; suspect apprehension, crime scene documentation; tactical operations; scene security; hazard monitoring; identification and mitigation; response to emergency calls; crisis communications; legally authorized surveillance.

Initial cost: Approximately $25,000 - $30,000 (existing MPD budget) Annual costs: Approximately $500
Legal:

Procedural: MPD Policies – 606 Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations Required training:

ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 38, Packet Page 176

QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION REQUEST
GOVERNMENT CODE § 7070(c)(10)
Description: Semiautomatic Rifles and Ammunition
Quantity
(existing/sought): 8 (sought)
Capabilities: The Colt semiautomatic rifle is capable of firing 5.56mm projectile bullet.

Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's
description:

The Colt features the railed forend. The rail system features the patented bolt-up attachment system. The Colt rifle is unmatched in size, weight, and performance. These rifles are ambidextrous Purpose(s)/Authorized
Use:

Officers may deploy the patrol rifle in any circumstance where the officer can articulate a reasonable expectation that the rifle may be needed. Examples of some general guidelines for deploying the patrol rifle may include but are not limited to:
(1) Situations where the member reasonably anticipates an armed encounter. (2) When a member is faced with a situation that may require accurate and effective fire at long range. (3) Situations where a member reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect's firepower. (4) When a member reasonably believes that there may be a need to fire on a barricaded person or a person with a hostage.
(5) When a member reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor. (6) When authorized or requested by a supervisor.
(7) When needed to euthanize an animal.

Initial cost: Approximately $21,100 (includes, rifle, optics, slings, and flashlight) Annual costs: Approximately $1,500 (ammunition, repair parts, batteries, etc.) Legal: CA Penal Code 33220(b). All other applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing short-barreled rifles and police use of force.

Procedural: MPD Policies - 300 (Use of Force), 306 (Firearms), 412 (Rapid Response and Deployment) Required training: CA POST certified 16-hour patrol rifle course & 4 hours annually / qualification annually Other Notes:

These rifles are standard issue service weapons for MPD officers and as a result, exempted from the Military Equipment Use Policy per CA Gov’t Code §7070 (c)(10). They have been included in this document for transparency.

The MPD will be replacing 8 rifles that are 20 years old. For approximately 12 years, these rifles were department pool rifles and have a great deal of wear and tear.

ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 4/1/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 39, Packet Page 177

Monterey City CouncilApril 1, 2025

Monterey City Council
April 1, 2025